HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/04/1985h`a^71
EOEN PRAIRIE
TUESDAY, JUNE 4, 1985
CITTNUNCIL AGENDA
7:31 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILIING IOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Mayer Gary Petersen, Richard Andersen,
George Sentley, Patricia Pidcock and
Paul Reipath
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson; City
Attorney Roler Pauly; Finance eirector
John Franc; Planning Director Chris
Enger; Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert; Director of Public
Werks Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Karen Michael
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. City Council meeting held Tuesday, April if, ltt5
B. Beard of Review meeting held Tuesday, tay 21 1985
C. Joint School/City Meeting held Tuesday, MAy .28, 1915
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 12-85, CATV Relief Ordinance;
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 1345 Amending Cable TV
TFinchise Ordinance Ni. 80-33. and approval of Perfermance
Agreement and authorize execution as ler approval of
City Manager
8. Chang e Order No. 1 Norsemen's 6th Addition I.C. 52-$65
C. Receive feasibiTltv report for Technology Drive Road
limErevements east from Wallace Read and set pyblic hearing
date for July 2, 1985 at 7:30 PM , 1.C. 52-110A
TRes.--Ni. 85-134)
D. Clerk's License List
E. THE OAKS BUSINESS CENTER by Steiner Development, Inc. Request
for 2nd Reading if Ordinance Ni. 17-15-PUI-3-85, Rezoning from
Rural to 1-2 Park; Approval of Oeveloper's Agreement far the
Oaks business Center; and Adoption of Resolution Ne. 15-129,
Approving Sumnary of Ordinance Ni. 17-85-P1'1-3-85, and Ordering
Publication of said Ordinance. (Ordinance Ni. 1745-1.U0-3-85;
Resolution Ne. 85-129, Approving Summary and Ordering
Publication)
Page 1188
Page 1198
Page 1215
Page 868
Page 1219
Page 1211
Page 1212
Page 1213
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 4, 1985
Page 1221
Page 1224
Page 1225
Page 1238
Page 1246
Page 1248
Page 1249
Page 1251
Pale 1261
Page 1274
Page 1287
Page 1119
Page 1255
F. ChalEtOrder for Frani, Park Grading
G. Resolution No. 85-135 amending Resolution Ni. 35-10 (Fee
Resolution) establishing fees for Tax Exempt Financin g
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. SOUTHWEST CROSSINGS by Vantage Companies. Request for Planned
Unit Development Concept Review on approximately 186 acres
for 1.626 million square feet of •fice and commercial uses.
. Location: East of Highway #16,, North of Interstate 1-494,
West of Viking Training facility, and South of Nine Mile Creek.
(Resolution No. 85-127 - PUP Concept Approval)
I. JUHL PACIFIC by Opus Corporation. Request for Zoning District
Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on 4.5 acres and Preliminary
Plat of 4.5 acres into one lot for construction of a 61,08$
square foot office/warehouse. Location: Southeast corner of
Valley View Road and Executive Drive. (Ordinance No. 18-85 -
Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park; Resolution Ni. 85-121 -
Preliminary Plat)
C. VACATION OF ST. J•HN'S DRIVE (Resolution No. 85-133)
O. VACATION OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHT-IF-WAY IN PART OF RIDGEWOOD
WEST (Ts' newly platted as Plat 3)7ki5lution No. 85-131
E. VACATION OF A SEGMENT OF OLD SHADY OAK ROAD IMMEDIATELY SOUTH
OF 62N1 STREEf -(RiiiTution No. 35-027
F. REOUEST FOR MUNICIPAL INIBUSTRIAL IEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF-T4 -XiTIFICIO FOR EVERGREEN PROPERTIE -TResiTUTion
No. 85-136)
G. REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL INIUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SOMAS IN THE
AMOUNT-072,5/0,1100.11$ FOR HAGEN SYSTEg-TKIALITY Resolution
No. 85-137
H. REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE
kitutiT -674,5000OLOO riniAMPTON HITE-(Resolution No.
85-138)
PAYMENT IF CLAIMS NOS. 21464 - 21795
OROINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
PETITIONS, REUESTS & COMMUNICATIINS
A. Lueck sewer/water connection fee. (Continued from May 21, Ticy
B. RESEARCH FARM 2N1 APOITION by Northrup King. Request for
Preliminary Plat of approximately 177 acres into six •utists.
Location: West of Highway 169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway.
(Resolution No. 35-126 - Preliminary Plat; Resolution No.
85-138 - Final Plat)
City Council Agenda -3 - Tues.,June 4, 1985
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District - Endorsement for the
reappointment of Dr. Eugene Davis to the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
B. Report of City Manager
I. Staffing Request - Public Safety Department
C. Report of City Attorney
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1305
Page 1307
AGENDA
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JUNE 4, 1985
6:00 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING BOARDROOM
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION:
CITY STAFF:
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and
Paul Redpath
Doug Beardsley, Woodrow Bjork, William
Jackson, Margaret "Peg" Johnson,
Elizabeth Kelly, Leslie Thoreson and
James D. Van Horn
Human Services Coordinator Jan Flynn,
Director of Community Services Bob
Lambert, City Manager Carl J. Jullie,
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W.
Dawson, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
I. ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
III. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION
A. Update of City Code regarding duties and responsibilities
of Human Rights7Fgervices Commission
B. Role of Commission
C. Procedures for directives from Council to the Commission
IV. NEW BUSINESS
V. ADJOURNMENT.
1. Making a study and inventory o .afural resources in the City. 2. Recommendation of plans and policie ior tia.. preservation of natural resources in the City. 3. Review of major land use proposals fo i•an,,atency with natural resource preservation. 4. Making recommendations to the Counci 1.“ action programs to insure preservation of natura S. Cooperation and coordination of th, uwwironmenta programs and proposals with other City groups groups, and County, State and Federal agencies tha have application within the City. 6. Establishing programs and dissemina iii of information to better inform and guide env ironmenta ..hoices of residents of the City. SEC. 2.16. HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION. Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. A Hume! Rights and Services Commission, composed of seven (7) members !lereby established for the purpose of securing for al. citi?ens equal opportunity in employment, housing, publi. ,ii,..a.udations, public services and education and full parti. Pa t on in the affairs of the City by assisting the Minnesot. hehultment of Human Rights in implementing State laws agains discri,ination and by advising the Council in long-range pro, ,,rims to improve community relations in the City. Commissioi ...end.ers shall serve staggered three-year terms. Subd. 2. Duties. Duties of the Human Rights ani Services Commission are to: A. Adopt by-laws and rules for the conduct o Its affairs including the election, assumption of duties an. definition of responsibilities of officers and committees. B. Maintain a memorandum of agreement with th. State Department of Human Rights for the purpose of determin.' ing regulatory and enforcement procedures. . C. Enlist the cooperation of agencies, organi. .eations and individuals in the community in an active prograi oirected to create equal opportunity and eliminate discrimina• tion and inequalities. D. Formulate a human relations program for th. City to give increased effectiveness and direction to the wor of all individuals and agencies addressing themselves to plan. ning, policy making and educational programming in the area o ...ail and human rights. E. ' Advise the Mayor, the Council and other agencies of the government on human relations and civil rights problems; Act in an advisory Capacity with respect to plan-ning or operation of any City department on issues of civil and human rights and recommend the adoption of such specific policies of actions as are needed to provide for full equal opportunity in the community. F. Develop in cooperation with the State De- partment of Human Rights such programs of formal and informal education as will assist in the implementation of the Minne-sota State Act Against Discrimination and provide for the Commission's assumption of leadership in recognizing and re-solving potential problem areas in the community. G. Continue evaluation of City Code provisions and procedures in order to accommodate City group homes expe-rience. H. maintain an up-to-date inventory of group home locations, and possible areas for home locations that may be available. I. Oversee the relationship between facilities and its neighborhood environment, and suggest and encourage communication between group homes and the community and ini-tiate if necessary. J. Review all applications for group homes in Conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Chapter, and prepare a report which details how each home meets City Code and State law provisions. K. Establish liaison with appropriate State agencies and community groups that provide services for group home residents or are involved in their regulation. To act as a mediator to resolve problems or misunderstandings between homes and neighbors or State agencies. L. Design and recommend implementation of neighborhood and community-wide education programs to enable citizens to better understand the needs and capacilities of group home residents and enable group home residents to better understand opportunities available to them within the City. M. Work with the State and County agencies in-volved with deinstitutionalization policies to give Eden Prairie decision-makers correct and advanced knowledge of new programs or regulations. N. Provide a forum for all citizens to express ideas concerning the community-based services concept. 17 (9-17-82) 18 (9-17-82)
0. Develop ways that group home residents can better utilize City/religious/school/civic organizations ser-vices. P. Act as coordinator of all group and foster homes to maximize their communication enabling better economic efficiency and program compatibility. O. Assist all supervised residential programs or social rehabilitation programs and perform all functions that might be performed by a Human Services Needs Board/Com-mittee. SEC. 2.17. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION. Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. A Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission, composed of seven (7) mem-bers is hereby established. Such members shall be appointed as follows: three members for a term of three yearS, two mem-bers for a term of two years, and two members for a term Of one year. One member shall represent the Metropolitan Air-ports Commission to be appointed by the Chairman of the metro-politan Airports Commission. The Mayor, with the approval of the Council, shall appoint no less than two members to repre-sent the Flying Cloud Airport Businessmen's Association and four members, at least three of whom are residents of Eden Prairie and represent the community's interest. Subsequent appointments shall be made for three year terms. Terms shall continue until successors are appointed and qualified. Subd. 2. Duties. The duties of the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission are as follows: A. The Commission shall advise the Council and the metropolitan Airports Commission with regard to all mat-ters affecting the Flying Cloud Airport, the classification, rules and regulations supplied to the operation of that Air-port and the development of lands adjacent to said Airport. B. The Commission shall cooperate with the Metropolitan Airports Commission Staff in reviewing for the Leneflt of the Council matters affecting the use and control of the Flying Cloud Airport and shall make its recommendations to the Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission upon request with regard to any proposal affecting the use or oper-ation of Flying Cloud Airport. SEC. 2.18. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL COMMISSION. Subd. 1. Establishment and Composition. An Histor-ical and Cultural Commission, composed of seven (7) members, is hereby established for the purpose of advising the Council as to activities, programs and facilities of historical and (9-17-82) 19
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 16, 1985
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: all members were present.
7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
Mayor Gary D. Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and Paul Redpati
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the
City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning
Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Ser-
vices Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Item III. B. Red Rock Heights by Jerry Halmrast & Bill Gilk was moved to be
considered with item VII, B, on May 7, 1985.
The following item was added: III. 1, 2nd Reading for Bluffs West 4th Addition,
(Resolution No. 106-84),
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Agenda and Other
Items of Business as published and amended Motion carried unanimously,
II. MINUTES
A. Minutes of City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 19, 1985
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue approval of these
Minutes to the May 7. 1985, Meeting of the City Council for expansion of the
discussion Bluffs West Vicinity Storm Sewer, Motion carried unanimously,
B. Minutes of Joint City Council/School Board Meeting held Tuesday, March 5,
0-85
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Minutes of
the Joint City Council/School Board Meetino held Tuesday, March 5, 1985,
as published. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -2- April 16, 1985
C. Minutes of City Council Meeting held Tuesday. March 5, 1985
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of
the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 5. 1985, as published.
Motion carried unanimously,
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. RED ROCK HEIGHTS by Jerry Halmrast and Bill Gilk, 2nd Reading of Ordinance
No. 7-85, zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5 for 22.6 acres;
approval of Developer's Agreement for Red Rock Heights, and adoption of
Resolution No. 85-87, approving Summary of Ordinance No. 7-85 and ordering
publication of said Summary. 33,9 acres into 50 single family lots and
three outlots. Location: south of Scenic Heights Road, east of County
Road No. 4. (Ordinance No, 7-85 - zoning district change and Resolution
No. 85-87 - approving Summary of Ordinance) - continued to May 7, 1985
C. CARDARELLE III by Frank Cardarelle. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 9-85 for
zoning district change from Rural to Office for 1.05 acres; adoption of
Resolution No. 85-91, approving development plans for Cardarelle III Office
Building; and adoption of Resolution No. 85-93 approving Summary of Ordinance
No, 9-85 and ordering publication of said Summary. 8,150 square foot office
building. Location: north of Regional Center, west of Eden Road. (Ordinance
No. 9-85 - zoning district change, Resolution No, 85,91 = approving development
plans and adoption of Resolution No. 85-93 approving Summary of Ordinance No.
9-85 and ordering publication of said Summary.)
D. Change Order No. 1, Grading contract for Homeward Hills Park, LC, 51-374
E. Set Tuesday, May 28, 1985, 6:00 p.m., School Administration Building, as
TeTime and date for a Joint Meeting of the City Council/School Board and
Adhoc City Needs Study Committee
F. Final Plat approval for Eden Commons (Resolution No, 85-95)
G. Proposed revision to Tree Ordinance (Ordinance No, 11,85)
H. Authorize execution of Quit Claim Deed to the Independent Millwork
I. 2nd Reading for Bluffs West 4th Addition (Ordinance No, 106-84)
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A and C - I
on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -3- April 16, 1985
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Feasibility Report for Preserve Boulevard Improvements between Prairie
Center Drive and Anderson Lakes Parkway, 1.C. 52-071 (Resolution No.
85-83) continued Public Hearing from April 2. 1985
City Manager Jullie stated there was now some clarification available
from BRW on the traffic data which indicated substantially different
traffic volumes dependent upon future upgrading of County Road 18 south
of 1-494. Jullie noted that Hennepin County Staff said County Road 18
is tentatively scheduled for upgrading in an 1989-1990 P
Director of Public Works Dietz said it would cost $21,400 to extend the
four-lane portion of Preserve Boulevard to Westwind Drive (from Franlo.)
Pidcock said she had talked with engineers at BRW and it was her impression
that the volume of traffic would not be greatly increased. Bentley said
he could not go along with that viewpoint and would highly recommend
that portion of Preserve Boulevard be increased to four lanes at this
time.
Anderson asked if there were projections made as to the amount of traffic
to be generated by a new elementary school, Dietz said there were no
specifics on this.
Redpath said the City should look at what Bloomington has done; it has
constructed four-lane roads just east of County Road 18. Redpath said
he would like to see a four-lane roadway all the way from Prairie Center
Drive to Anderson Lakes Parkway but, if that is not agreeable, then he
would suggest a four-lane to Westwind Drive,
Doug Reuter, 8750 Black Maple Drive, related his experiences in travelling
on Preserve Boulevard, He said he would like to see the roadway be four-
lane from Westwind north to Prairie Center Drive, He asked about the
alleged agreement between The Preserve and the City regarding roadways.
Bentley said it was not unusual for a developer to pay for 100% of a
road within a development and this is what The Preserve had done,
Carlton Moore, 10735 Fieldcrest Road, stated it is now easy for Preserve
residents to take the Highway 169 route via Preserve Boulevard and Prairie
Center Drive which also avoids County Road 18. He indicated his support
for the project.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing,
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 85-83,
ordering Project No. I.C, 51-071 with four-lanes to be constructed to
Westwind Drive and with right-lanes designated for through traffic southbound
and as a "free" right-turn from Westwind onto Preserve Boulevard northbound,
Motion carried unanimously.
roject.
IN O
City Council Minutes -4- April 16, 1985
B. Vacation of excess right-of-way and easements in Bluffs West 4th Addition
(Resolution No. 85-96)
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing had bee
n
published.
Director of Public Works Dietz indicated this was a "housekeepin
g
-
t
y
p
e
"
matter.
There were no questions from the audience.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Publ
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resoluti
o
n
N
o
.
85-96, vacating excess right-of-way and drainage and utility ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
Bluffs West Addition. Motion carried unanimously,
C. PRIMETECH PARK, PHASE I, by MRTT Joint Venture. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on approxiMit757 20 acres, Planned Unit
District Amendment on six acres, zoning district change from 1-
2
P
a
r
k
t
o
Office on 1.93 acres for a 31,500 square foot office building.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
north of Shady Oak Road, east of City West Parkway. (Resoluti
o
n
N
o
.
8
5
-
9
2
-
PUD Concept Amendment and Ordinance No. 10-85 - amending Ordina
n
c
e
N
o
.
14-84 from 1-2 Park to Office)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had bee
n
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
and property owners within the project vicinity had been notif
i
e
d
.
David Broesder, architect for the proponents, addressed the pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
.
Director of Planninp Enger stated this proposal had been revie
w
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Planning Commission at its meeting on March 25, 1985, at which t
i
m
e
t
h
e
Commission voted to recommend approval subject to the recommenda
t
i
o
n
s
included in the Staff Report of March 22, 1985.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Publi
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
and to adopt Resolution No, 85-92, approving the Primetech Park
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment to the Primetch Park
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
Unit Development Concept. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Readin
g
t
o
Ordinance No. 10-85, amending Ordinance No, 14-84 from 1-2 Park
t
o
Office. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
an amendment to the prior Developer's Agreement per Commission
a
n
d
S
t
a
f
f
recommendations. Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -5- April 16, 1985
D. REQUEST FOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,000,000.00 FOR
TANAGER CREET -TResolution No. 85-97)
City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published.
Thomas Maple, representina Miller Schroeder, bond consultant j and Len
Thiel, repesenting Cheyenne Land were present to address the proposal.
Also present was Kenneth Dodds, attorney for the project.
Redpath asked if this would be a public sale of the bonds. Finance Director
Frane said it would be and noted there was no provision made for a third
party guarantee via a letter of credit or such. There was discussion as
to the necessity for such a guarantee. Maple indicated Richard Neslund,
principal in Cheyenne Land Company, had pledged his own net worth above
and beyond that of Cheyenne Land Company; Neslund has not revealed his
own net worth, however. Redpath said he would like to see more specific
figures in regard to the guarantees. Maple stated these figures had been
made available to the City of Plymouth last year when a similar project
was developed.
City Attorney Pauly said the financial information requested would be
appropriate for the City to have.
Anderson said he would like to have a recommendation from the City Attorney
based on the additional materials requested by the Council.
Maple and Thiel stated what types of information had been made available
to the City of Plymouth. It was the consensus of the Council that this
material be provided to the City of Eden Prairie also.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue this item to the
May 7, 1985, Meeting of the City Council. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 19587 - 19840
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Payment of Claims
Nos. 19587 - 19840. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley. Pidcock, Redpath and
Peterson voted "aye," Motion carried unanimously,
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Findinas and Conclusions relatina to the request of Welcome Home to operate
a licensed residentialTiOlity_ (Continued from FOr 7c7h 19, 1985)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the Findings and
Conclusions relating to the request of Welcome Home to operate a licensed
residential facility at 7170 Bryant Lake Drive: Motion carried with
Anderson, Redpath and Pidcock voting "yes"; Bentley and Peterson voting
"no."
Steve Schele, representing Welcome Home, indicated he had sworn affidavits
to present to the Council, Bentley suggested these come to the Council via
Staff.
City Council Minutes -6- April 16, 1985
B. CATV Relief Ordinance (Ordinance No. 12-85); Ordinance Amending Ca
b
l
e
T
V
Franchise Ordinance No. 80-33 'Ordinance No. 13-85); and Review and
Adoption of Performance Agreement
City Manager Jullie reviewed what had happened during the past year
w
h
e
n
the Cable company first went to the Cable Commission to indicate it w
a
s
having financial problems and wanted financial relief ; Jullie said the
financial relief package between Rogers Cablesystems and the Southwes
t
Suburban Cable Commission was now ready for formal action by the five
City Councils. Jullie called attention to the memorandum from the
Commission's Attorney as well as the memoranda from the Commission's
Administrator.
Ralph Campbell, Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Administrator;
Dottie Reitow, attorney for Rogers Cablesystems; Gary Mizgah, Cable
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
Administrator; and Wayne Popham, attorney, were present to answer q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
.
Redpath noted the Edina City Council had acted favorably upon this
a
t
its meeting last evening.
Bentley asked what would happen if the City did not approve the Ordinances
or if the City approved them with changes. Campbell said if any city
c
h
o
s
e
not to adopt the agreement, the other cities would then have the option t
o
back out of the agreement if they had already passed it. If changes were
made by one city, it would again allow the other cities to back out
o
f
the agreement. Bentley noted the ordinance before the Council was a
compromise agreement.
City Attorney Pauly said his office had participated in drafting the
agreement.
There were no comments from the audience.
Anderson asked where we are headed with cable. Redpath said that see
m
s
t
o
be a universal question; he said cable systems throughout the countr
y
a
r
e
running into problems which are largely due to the advent of video c
a
s
s
e
t
t
e
recorders. Redpath indicated he felt this was an opportunity to hel
p
t
h
e
company to get back on its feet.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to give 1st Reading to
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
No. 12-85, relating to cable television service, providing for modif
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of their requirements of the City's cable communications ordinance (
C
A
T
V
Ordinance). Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconed by Bentley, to give 1st Reading to Ordinance
No. 13-85, amending Ordinance No. 80-33 as amended by Ordinance No.
2
5
-
8
3
and No. 46-83 to change the name of grantee; to extend the franchise
t
e
r
m
;
to change the insurance requirements; and to change the computation
o
f
t
h
e
purchase price to be paid by the City upon expiration of the franchi
s
e
.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -7- April 16, 1985
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize execution
of the Performance Agreement which includes Exhibits A and B to be
executed by the Cable Comnission. Motion carried unanimously.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. St. John's Drive - Road Connection
City Manager Jullie noted this item was before the Council because
the developers of Tanager Creek are ready to proceed with preparation
of final construction plans and wish to know which alternative should
be used regarding the connection to St. John's Drive.
Bentley said he had serious questions about connecting a private street
and a public street. He stated he would support Alternate B as outlined
in Director of Public Works Dietz's memorandum of April 10, 1985.
Redpath said he favored Alternate B also.
Peter Stalland, representing the St. John's Wood Homeowners Association,
spoke to his letter of April 9, 1985, which discussed this matter.
Len Thiel, representing Cheyenne Land Company, Tanager Creek developer,
asked for clarification regarding the three alternatives. Bentley
explained them as outlined in Dietz's memorandum. Planning Director
Enger suggested the developer could work with Staff if there was a
problem relating to reorienting the units due to the location of the
street:
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Alternative B
(St. John's Drive would be vacated and become a private street, etc. -
see Director of Public Works Dietz's memorandum of April 10, 1985,
with attached map) and to authorize Staff to work with the developer
to make minor modifications to the site plan and to direct Staff to
set a Public Hearing date for the vacation of St. John's Drive. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. Request by William Gilk and Jerry Halmrast to review decision of Board of
Appeals & Adjustments regarding Red Rock Heights variances
City Manager Jullie stated the Board of Appeals & Adjustments had voted
to deny the variances requested by Gilk and Halmrast. Jullie said the
matter before the Council was to set the date for a time the decision
of the Board of Appeals & Adjustments. He said the proponents had asked
if the Council would give some input as to amendments to the site plan
to make it more acceptable. Bentley asked if this would be appropriate
to do. City Attorney Pauly said it would be "gratuitous" at this time to
do so.
City Council Minutes -8- April 16, 1985
Jerry Halmrast, 15117 Scenic Heights Road, said they could take out one
lot and still be ok with the proposal. Ron Krueger, consultant for the
project, asked what would happen if they removed one lot and the DNR
found the project unacceptable. Director of Planning Enger reviewed the
DNR's recourse according to the Shoreland Management Act; it has the
right to review and comment, but has no veto power.
Bentley suggested the developer get together with Staff to see what might
be done to mitigate the situation regarding the DNR's regulations.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to review the decision of
the Board of Appeals and Adjustments regarding Red Rock Heights variances
at the May 7, 1985, Meeting of the City Council to be held at 7:30 p.m.
in the School Administration Building. Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Recycling Advisory Committee - Request authorization for community survey
on recycling
City Manager Jullie addressed a memorandum dated April 12, 1985, in which
this issue was discussed.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize a survey on
recycling to be done by the tk associates and to authorize Staff to
pursue a grant from the Metropolitan Council and/or Hennepin County
to pay for the study. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Bentley - suggested the Council act on the City Manager's salary request
and to conduct a performance review by July. Redpath said he would like
to see the performance review done sometime during the month of July so
new Council members would have had six months to work with Jullie.
Peterson said he assumed salary and performance were tied together and
stated he was not prepared to vote on a salary increase tonight. Bentley
said he felt there should be a salary increase and that a performance
review should be conducted independently from that action. Redpath, Ander-
son and Pidcock concurred.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to increase City Manager Jullie's
salary to $55,000 per year, effective April 15, 1985; and to conduct a per-
formance review at a date to be determined during the month of July. Roll
call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Pidcock, Redpath and Peterson voted "yes."
Motion carried unanimously.
Pidcock asked if there were provisions in the Data Practices Act for
a private review. City Attorney Pauly said it was his understanding
that there were no exceptions; there was presently a bill before the
Legislature creating an exception but it had not been passed to date.
Bentley said he felt Pidcock had raised a valid point; it was hard to
make an objective review in a public format. There was discussion as
to whether or not forms used in performance evaluations would have to
be signed by the Council members. Pauly said he would look into this.
City Council Minutes -9- April 16, 1985
Peterson - announced the Hoisington Group will be making a presentation
regarding the landfill tomorrow evening.
- recommended a commendation be given to Jan Flynn and the Human
Rights and Services Commission for the Day Care Fair which they planned
and presented on Saturday. Peterson said it was very well done.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Fitness Program
City Manager Jullie called attention to a memorandum of March 18, 1985,
in which this issue was addressed.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the fitness
program for City employees as outlined in the March 19, 1985, memor-
andum. Motion carried with Bentley voting "no."
2. Finance Department
City Manager Jullie stated there is a need for more help in the
Finance Department; the position which is recommended is that of
a full-time clerk.
Director of Finance Frane said this would be preferrably someone
with a bookkeeping background.
Bentley asked where the money would come from for this person.
Jullie said it would come from the General Fund reserve. Bentley
asked why this position was not considered at budget time. Frane
said there had not been any staff added to the Finance Department
in four years. He said he had wanted to keep staffing at its present
level, using part-time help when necessary, as long as possible;
the time had now come when that was no longer proving to be feasible.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to authorize the City
Manager to hire an additional person in the Finance Department.
Motion carried unanimously.
Peterson said he does not like to see an additional person added
three months into the budget year and would hope that staffing needs
can be better assessed prior to adoption of next year's budget.
C. Report of City Attorney
City Attorney Pauly noted that regulation of gambling is now done by
the State (as adopted during the last Legislative session.) He stated
the City Code will have to be amended to reflect that fact. He suggested
the Council give consideration as to what form the City might like to
have this take as the City can adopt regulations in this regard.
City Council Minutes -10- April 16 t 1985
Redpath said he would like to see the City adopt some type of ordinance
which would reject what is going on in other communities regarding
gambling for charities.
City Attorney Pauly will further research this.
X. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting at 10:10
p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
TUESDAY, MAY 21, 1985
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS:
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
6:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROOM 5
President of the Board Gary D. Peterson, Richard
Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and
Paul Redpath
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Assessor
Steve Sinell, City Staff Appraisers Jim Donna
and Tom O'Brien, Hennepin County Assessor
Donald Monk, and Recording Secretary Karen
Michael
I. RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
Board of Review President Peterson reconvened the Board of Review wh
i
c
h
h
a
d
previously met on May 2, 1985.
II. APPROVAL OF BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING HELD THURSDAY,
M
A
Y
2, 1985
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes
o
f
t
h
e
Board of Review Meeting held Thursday, May 2, 1985, as published. M
o
t
i
o
n
carried with Pidcock abstaining.
III. REVIEW OF ITEMS CONTINUED FROM MAY 2, 1985
City Assessor Sinell called attention to the materials which had been
s
e
n
t
to Board members regarding the items referred to the Board of Advisor
s
.
1. THOMAS HERZOG - 16040 Alpine Way - 08-116-22 11 0059
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the reconvmd
a
t
i
o
n
of the Board of Advisors and reduce the estimated market value of th
i
s
property from $107,400 to $94,000. Motion carried unanimously.
2. ROGER SWIGERT - 13184 Cardinal Creek Road - 03-116-22 44 0002
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the recommen
d
a
t
i
o
n
of the Board of Advisors and reduce the estimated market value of t
h
i
s
property from $236,500 to $215,000. Motion carried unanimously.
i19`,
Minutes of the Board of Review -2- May 21, 1985
3. RONALD EZERSKI - 13192 Cardinal Creek Road - 03-116-22 41 0004
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the recommendation
of the Board of Advisors and reduce the estimated market value of this
property from $245,000 to $235,000. Motion carried unanimously.
4. CLIFFORD THOMPSON - 6559 Kurtz Lane
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the recommendation
of the Board of Advisors and reduce the estimated market value of this
property from $87,000 to $79,000. Motion carried unanimously.
5. ROSEMARY SOLTIS - 11003 Spoon Ridge - 25-116-22 23 0012
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt the recommendation
of the Board of Advisors and to sustain the City Assessor's estimated
market value of this property at $220,200. Motion carried unanimously.
6. WILLIAM QUIRK - 14308 Charing Cross - 03-116-22 32 0051
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt the recommendation
of the Board of Advisors and reduce the estimated market value of this
property from $102,000 to $92,000. Motion carried unanimously.
7. F & L ENTERPRISES - 6331 Industrial Drive - 03-116-22 22 0016
Bernie Fink, owner of this property, stated he felt the increase was too
high; he said if his property were on the 'other side of the tracks" the
amount would be justified. City Assessor Sinell noted there was no other
area in the City comparable to this and indicated the Board of Advisors had
the same problem in trying to some up with a comparable area on which to
base the estimated market value. Sinell said if this were to go to the
County for its review, its appraisers might be able to come up with
comparables not available in Eden Prairie.
Bentley said he felt a reduction of $20,000 - $25,000 was in order.
Anderson said he felt the Board had to go along with the information
which was available; if the County has more knowledge then it should
be better able to arrive at an estimated market value. Bentley said he
felt this property had been increased in value rather greatly over the
past few years and it seemed high to him.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to reduce the value of
the property by $16,000. Motion failed with Anderson, Pidcock and
Peterson voting "no."
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the recommendation
of the Board of Advisors and to sustain the City Assessor's estimated
market value of this property at $252,000. Motion carried with Bentley
voting "no."
I kg
Minutes of the Board of Review -3- May 21, 1985
8. DIANNE & PAUL REESE - 6982 Edgebrook Place - 03-116-22 44 0018
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt the recommendation
of the Board of Advisors and to sustain the City Assessor's estimated
market value of this property at $240,000. Motion carried unanimously.
Anderson asked City Assessor Sinell if property values were going down. Pidc
o
c
k
noted an article in Saturday's edition of the Minneapolis Star and Tribune wh
i
c
h
indicated this was the case. Sinell stated the market is "flat"; he said he
i
s
finding there is no change in the sale prices of similar houses within a neig
h
-
borhood between 1984 and 1985.
The following items had been referred to the City Assessor for further review
.
1. HOYT DEVELOPMENT - Shady View I - 12-116-22 11 0011
- Shady View II - 12-116-22 12 0004
- Bachman's - 12-116-22 41 0005 & 12-116-22 42 0007
- Technology Park - 12-116-22 41 0007
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain the estimated
market values on these properties as recommended by the City Assessor:
Shady View I = $2,263,000; Shady View II = $4,317,000; Bachman's =
$1,771,000; and Technology Park = $4,343,000. Motion carried unanimously.
2. CHERNE CONTRACTING CORP. - 9855 West 78th Street - 13-116-22 14 0011
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Redpath, to sustain the City Assessor's
estimated market value on this property at $6,000,000. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. GORDON WEBER & STEVE HYATT - 7655 Mitchell Road - 10-116-22 33 0009
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt the recommendation
of the City Assessor and reduce the estimated market value of this
property from $474,600 to $404,000. Motion carried unanimously.
Letters were received from the following (copies are attached to the Minutes
on file.)
1. THE NORTHLAND COMPANY - 12-116-22 14 0008 and 12-116-22 14 0009
2. 10295 Winter Place - 35-116-22 21 0101
3. 12054 Chesholm Lane - 35-116-22 21 0009
4. Krohnke - 09-116-22 34 0049
5. Krohnke - 09-116-22 34 0050
Minutes of the Board of Review -4- May 21, 1985
6. EDENVALE APARTMENTS - 10-116-22 31 0007
7. EDFNVALE APARTMENTS - 10-116-22 31 0006
8. A.G. Haupt/J.E. Thomas - 14-116-22 42 0002 & 14-116-22 13 0005
9. KENSINGTON INV. INC. - 12-116-22 14 0020
10. Curt Conrad - 6910 Edgebrook Place - 03-116-22 44 0024
11. EXARP CORPORATION - Shady Oak III - 01-116-22 43 0008
12. EXARP CORPORATION - 10300 70th Street West - 01-116-22 43 0013
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to sustain the C
i
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
o
r
'
s
estimated market values on the following properties: The Nor
t
h
l
a
n
d
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
-
12-116-22 14 0008 and 12-116-22 14 0009; 10295 Winter Place -
3
5
-
1
1
6
-
2
2
2
1
0
1
0
1
;
12054 Chesholm Lane - 35-116-22 21 0009; Krohnke - 09-116-22
3
4
0
0
4
9
;
K
r
o
h
n
k
e
-
09-116-22 34 0050; Edenvale Apartments - 10-116-22 31 0007; E
d
e
n
v
a
l
e
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
-
10-116-22 31 0006; A.G. Haupt/J.E. Thomas - 14-116-22 42 0002 a
n
d
1
4
-
1
1
6
-
2
2
1
3
0
0
0
5
:
Kensington Inv. Inc. - 12-116-22 14 0020; Curt Conrad - 03-1
1
6
-
2
2
4
4
0
0
2
4
;
Exarp Corporation - Shady Oak III - 01-116-22 43 0008; and Exar
p
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
-
10300 70th Street West - 01-116-22 43 0013. Motion carried unan
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
City Manager Jullie noted a memorandum dated May 14, 1985, from
C
i
t
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
Pauly in which he discussed the authority of Hennepin County to
e
q
u
a
l
i
z
e
assessments.
Bentley said he had raised this point at the last meeting of th
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Review because property owners had indicated Eden Prairie's pro
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
h
a
d
an estimated market value closer to the selling price than thos
e
i
n
o
t
h
e
r
communities. Bentley said that Bloomington was the city most o
f
t
e
n
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
as being lower.
Donald Monk, Hennepin County Assessor, said there are frequent
l
y
a
l
l
e
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
like this made. He explained the role of Hennepin County in th
e
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
process; cities such as Eden Prairie with populations of less
t
h
a
n
3
0
,
0
0
0
forward their preliminary assessments to the County prior to t
h
e
t
i
m
e
t
h
e
s
e
are reviewed by the local Board of Review and they are analyze
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
while those cities with populations over 30,000 do not forward
t
h
e
i
r
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
to the County until after their Boards of Review have met. Th
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
o
r
is charged with determining whether or not there is equalizat
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
and to recommend any changes to the County Board of Equalizat
i
o
n
.
M
o
n
k
n
o
t
e
d
that last year two communities were required by the Board of
E
q
u
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
make adjustments to their assessments; this was done on the b
a
s
i
s
o
f
h
i
s
recommendation to the Board. Monk stated he will again, if ne
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
,
m
a
k
e
similar recommendations regarding the 1985 assessments.
Minutes of the Board of Review -5- May 21, 1985
V. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 85-122, ACCEPTING THE 1985 ASSESSMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No.
85-122, accepting the 1985 assessment. Motion carried unanimously.
Bentley stated he would like to have City Assessor Sinell assess the proce
s
s
used this year and direct a memorandum to the Board of Review on this matt
e
r
.
Peterson indicated he would like to have the City Assessor state his opin
i
o
n
regarding the recommendations of the Board of Advisors, if the same proce
s
s
is used next year.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at
7:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
19.0
fa Qt. Nods Nfixecoox,.. State of Minnesota, oo, .-^••• I"-;-. I ‘c, r• • ..•• 1 Niko POI•of ffolfo Oa.. • I roam. loot. vo • to eal en., • Sara . 23000 71030 . 53:11 , 40000 175050 40000 19500 26000, 51030 „ 24000 60000. l000lao•no :-! • :'••••:2 •n•: : • r•ri n, 2 I 134001500 10000 8000 10000 Pr,rie We, the tt.trs..1,-4, 11ta."4 of Revier,:11.telant341—of the City of Eden Paine tn said County, do hereby certify that ere. and etch of so. attended at ttte efftre cf the Ae,An7e C. t c••0, va 2nd May le 85 th• day get forth 05th. notice given by the Cleric and It accordance otEtt; the rrvt•a:or.S. Of Sonata. Sectat ve ttroft chor.g it the :.--shesan•lents as entered in the 800701558 801070. W;toela our Gw.d.s nc• of Mdv " // • / • < •-../ • o./. •Asoloo offs or 0 wtoo• Moron sma,do 5,o • Ban. of ryt,a77.• 44•.• • b.1 of ft.... Chang,' nta1e to: Local Ilt.ard of Review— ..%•••--;/,- 7.7774- atoa -ro. loosue4 *$ tattoo fam-voe a F404.4 lion000rial. F.. ef Rosen>: nfrifofoo.. C C000000,O. t' • 1-ore, nee. roor Sb. S. I., • fe.000fi VIC • save.: totroaaai Cazofeential. Ell • Sai4e4 IWO 044. Song,, 14,4+4-40%, Priax ittate-aavt. • • Was , t tt. I. .4` Cam 4 1.4•4• •••••• ,--, .1.14Z Or 0."-Ell o..._ =Merton a a mom 04201 ao, .c.,„ v. ta P. Aso 100. 17 c. • „7 ....,....* . oa.. 4...)o) . Ur/ 4e505 . 11-1164242-0005 NO i CC :,.:.;!.ad '7..!.:r.. 15-V.S.22-32.0001 . No 1 A .,-,-,•n•e .....4,ts oeal Estate . : 13-116.22.12.T:03 No 1 CC . . :,,I,,,S ctn. 12-116.22.144013 . , NO I, 1 • , . 0...1,e7t:al :0s.^s,..te 12-1:6,22,41,0301 : : No I c ir..., .:al .'0,..1,a,ce 01-:16,22,13-3321 . : • NO ; C • ' - 0-,,,,111 s•.:,- 03-116-22-12.0332 , • ; No 1 I 1.1,5105 1415. 12-116,22,11-0006 : No ! I :m..47e1 :15:.- 12-1:f,..2?-11-0 .4 07 I No I 11 : 7,,-,s a Ii,sa ,e,..tv; C?.:18.22-11409Yesi R •- ' ; ! , .., is :4,, ;w'prt 03.116-l2-Z4,=2 ; Yes, R ..,l'.e. 5 i,e-.1!e Eztrsid 03-11642-41-5334 Yes!. A 7 7 . Cliffd,d :ne-:stn 00-116-22-24-0050 . Yes! R A:Lenr. s 7cle.-ary Soltis 25-116-22,23,0012 , Yes! R 1 i • killla-. f.Lifrt 03.116-22-32-0051 Yes! R Now WU. mobil led v.., I •14•0 Irrar. .1.1. n LW, 11.414•P ...I 444,14.7 •••••••••• : T4414.41 •• •44 4•0•1 •
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 P
• 6 •;, "
...•
1
4.J CC CL ' 1n1
,20 q
VI •
4
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SCHOOL/CITY JOINT MEETING
CITY NEEDS STUDY COMMITTEE:
ATHLETIC FACILITIES SUB-COMMITTEE:
CITY STAFF:
SCHOOL STAFF:
6 P.M., SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
Mayor Gary D. Peterson, Richard Anderson, Georgc
Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and Paul Redpath
Chairman Dave Anderson, Robert Higgens, Claude
Johnson, Phyllis Posner, Cutis Turner, Frederic',
Wolf, Jack VanRemortel, and member-elect Darlene
Wegner
Chairman Marty Jessen (a), Bud Baker, Pat
Breitenstein, Moe Cook (a), Gary Gonyea (a),
Jerry Kingrey, and Jesse Schwartz (a)
Chairman Ed Schuck, Julianne Bye (a), Christine
Dodge, Virginia Gartner (a), Bob Hallett, Stan
Johannes, and Dennis Marhula (a)
Chairman Carolyn Lyngdal, Moe Cook (a), Bob
Hallett, Curt Connaughty, Merle Gamm, Fred
Hoisington, Skip Lane (a), Gary Soderberg (a),
John Parrington, Gene Haberman, Swede Rasmus-
sen (a), Rich Anderson (a), Sue Osberg, John
Frane, and Bob Lambert
John Reedy (a), Lonnie Anderson (a), Gary
Soderberg (a), Rob Woodcock (a), Gene Haberman,
Larry Schuster (a), John Komula (a), Jim Osten-
son (a), and Swede Rasmussen (a)
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Director of
Public Safety Jack Hacking, Director of Planninc
Chris Enger, Recreation Superintendent Chuck
Pappas, Assistant to the City Manager Craig
Dawson, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
Superintendent of Schools Gerald McCoy and
Assistant Superintendent of Schools Judy Cooper
TUESDAY, MAY 28, 1985
CITY COUNCIL:
SCHOOL BOARD:
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL
RESOURCES COMMISSION:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
I. ROLL CALL
Those attending the meeting were those listed above unless otherwise noted
with an (a) following their names.
Mayor Peterson welcomed those attending and asked Director of Community Services
Lambert to review the role of the City Needs Study Committee.
).05
JOINT MEETING MINUTES -2- May 28, 1985
Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission had
received several requests from groups within the community to consider ex-
pansions of or additions to various recreation facilities in Eden Prairie.
The Commission reviewed these requests and recommended that the City appoint
a committee to study capital improvement projects which might require referen-
da within the next five years. Lambert said the City Council directed that
the Committee be made up of two representatives from the School District,
four members of the community at-large, one representative from the Planning
Commission, one representative from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission, one representative from the Chamber of Commerce, two representatives
from the City, two representatives from outdoor recreation facilities and two
representatives from indoor recreation facilities. The Council furthermore
directed the City Needs Study Committee to have a sub-committee made up of all
of the representatives from the various athletic associations; this sub-committee
would elect the four recreation facility representatives.
Lambert then introduced Carolyn Lyngdal, Chairman of the City Needs Study
Committee.
II. CITY NEEDS STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT
Chairman Carolyn Lyngdal introduced members of the Committee who were present.
She outlined what had been reviewed by the Committee at its various meetings.
Lyngdal stated the recommendations of the Recreation Facilities Sub-committee
which were reviewed by the City Needs Study Committee at its meeting on April
18, 1985.
Lyngdal noted that the Committee had spent time reviewing statistical information,
verifying facts and questioning Staff regarding reports, statistics, etc. Each
Committee member then voiced his or her opinion regarding various priorities.
The following motion was passed unanimously by the Committee:
1. Assuming the City can acquire the additional 30 acres at Miller Park without
a referendum, and that that acquisition process would begin during the summer
of 1985, the first referendum would be in the Spring of 1986 for Preserve Fire
Hall and three 1250 gallon pumpers and new City Hall with acquisition of the
Purgatory Creek Recreation Area.
2. Spring of 1987 a referendum for the development of Miller Park and a Community
Center addition.
3. Sometime beyond 1988 a referendum for an additional public safety and fire hall
needs.
Lyngdal called attention to the fact that the Committee had voted unanimously
in support of the motion. She said she felt each Committee member had come to
the meetings very well prepared.
Another motion which was passed unanimously by the Committee was: That this
Committee voice its support of the City Council for these future referendums
and indicated that representatives of this Committee would be willing to serve
on future bond referendum committees that would help to educate people of the
community regarding the need for these facilities.
JOINT MEETING MINUTES -3- May 28, 1985
Director of Community Services Lambert distributed an up-dated report on
the cost of various referenda to a homeowner. Lambert noted this was based
on the final-report figures.
Lyngdal noted the Committee had used population figures provided for the City
which nearly matched those released this week as part of the special census
just completed. The special census indicated a population of 24,042.
Executive Director of Business Services Game indicated the cost for all of
the needs noted by the School District would come to about eight and a half
mills.
Bentley thanked the Committee for the work it had done. He asked the School
Board how what was proposed fit in with its plans. School Board Chairman
Anderson said this was the first time he had seen the proposal. He indicated
the Board would have to discuss it themselves. He said he had questions re-
garding the Round Lake athletic facilities proposal; the School District and
the City would probably have to enter into a joint powers agreement which he
did not think was something the School District had done before. Anderson
also questionned the need for lighting the baseball fields. Lambert said
the area under discussion is actually owned by the School District. He said
the lighting of the baseball fields would allow them to be used over a greater
period of time. Anderson said his concern would be who was most appropriate
to do this -- the City or the School District. Bentley said that is the type
of thing he would like to see the School Board review and get back to the City
with its response.
Superintendent of Schools McCoy stated this was the first time the Committee
had reported and this meeting tonight was just the first step in the process
of reviewing the report and the recommendations included, He said he would
expect the School Board would get back to the City with its response very
soon.
School Board member Johnson expressed concern regarding timing of a referendum;
he said there might be competition if an elementary school and park were on the
same ballot. Redpath said, historically speaking, it would not be a good idea
to provide a shopping list but to rather have a plan for what is needed and
when it should be put before the voters. Bentley said he felt the priorities
which had been presented by the Committee were good; there was some logic to
their order.
Council member Anderson said he felt a question should be what is the best
means and the most efficient means of putting the facilities needed to use.
He said he felt the facilities should be able to be used by all; the public
then feels a genuine cost benefit. He said he hoped the City and the School
Board could work together to make these most reasonable and useful.
0.01
/A OF
JOINT MEETING MINUTES -4- May 28, 1985
School Board member VanRemortel expressed concern about an article which had
appeared in the Minneapolis Star and Tribune this morning. He said it sounded
to him as though the School Board and the City Council had "cast in stone" a
$41 million referendum. He said he hoped it could be shown that this will
stand on its own merits when the time comes. He said things must be done
one step at a time and cautioned that the kind of reporting as demonstrated
this morning might alienate a segment of the community.
Pidcock said she has been concerned because of Eden Prairie's reputation of
being a high-priced place to live. She expressed concern about what this will
do to the homeowner/tax-payer. Pidcock said she is concerned about the roads
in Eden Prairie. She said taxes have to be kept in line. Redpath said most
of the roads which are of concern are under the jurisdiction of the State or
Federal Departments of Transportation. Peterson said he felt the concern
about the image conveyed should be noted.
McCoy said he felt, as public bodies, the job of the School Board and the
Council was to plan and project needs. It is then up to the community to
determine whether or not to accept those plans. Peterson asked if it was
possible for the School Board and the City Council to recommend their needs
18 - 24 months in advance. McCoy said he felt it was possible to do so.
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission member Baker asked if the
Committee had looked at the cost and/or advantage of having a full-time fire
department. Director of Public Safety Hacking indicated this issue has been
studied from time-to-time and noted a full-time fire department would be very
costly to the City; building more fire stations throughout the community would
be less costly in the long run. Hacking indicated Bloomington has the lowest
insurance rates in the metropolitan area and it has a volunteer fire department.
Peterson said he found it very interesting that a Committee representing such
diverse groups came to this consensus. He thanked the Committee for its work.
III. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
CHANGE ORDER NO.
May 22, 1985
PROJECT: Norseman 6th Addition
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
E.P. I.C. 1152-065
RCM Project No. 841019
TO:
Northdale Construction
You are hereby directed to make the changes noted b
e
l
o
w
i
n
t
h
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
.
Nature of Change:
1. Remove 15" RCP storm sewer from CB4 to CB 3 to
s
t
u
b
.
.
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
w
i
t
h
2
4
"
R
C
P
.
2. Add 15" RCP stub from CB 1 to 10' beyond property
l
i
n
e
.
Justification:
1. Requested by developer of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; No
r
s
e
m
a
n
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
6
t
h
Addition. (10096 assessment of CO 01 to this property.)
Schedule of Adjustments to Contract Costs:
1. Mobilize 1 LS @ $1,500.00 =
1,500.00
2. Remove 15" RCP Storm Sewer 64 LF @ $2.50
160.00
3. Remove Catch Basin 1 EA @ $150.00
150.00
4. 24" RCP Storm Sewer Cl. III 64 LF @ $25.29
1,618.56
5. 24" Plug 1 EA @ $75.00
75.00
6. 15" RCP Storm Sewer Cl. III 25 LF @ $20.05
501.25
7. 15" Plug 1 EA @ $60.00
60.00
8. Connect to Existing Catch Basin 2 EA @ $400.00
800.00
9. Reuse Existing Catch Basin 1 EA @ $500.00
500.00
10. Remove Bituminous 100 SY @ $2.00
200.00
11. Remove Curb 50 LF @ $3.50
175.00
12. Saw Cutting 70 LF @ $1.50
105.00
Page 1
1o2 üO
Summary of Contract Adjustments:
Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order $ 381,933.30
Net Increase Resulting from this Change Order $ 5,844.81 •
Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order $ 386,873.11
The Above Changes are Approved:
RCM,po& CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Date 51226-5- Date
The Above Changes are Accepted:
. NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION
By
Date
Page 2
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 85-134
RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council
recommending the following improvements to wit:
. I.C. 52-010A, Technology Drive Road Improvements east from
Wallace Road
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance
with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said
boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total
cost of the improvements as shown.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on July 2,
1985, at 7:30 P.M., at the Eden Prairie School Administration
Building, 8100 School Road. The City Clerk shall give published and
mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Ian
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
June 4, 1985
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Bossardt-Christenson Corporation
Lifetouch, Inc.
Lindstrom Cleaning & Const.
Steiner Development, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
A.A.G. Builders
Bateson Builders
Block & Concrete Services, Inc.
Bryant Construction
Cikanek Builders, Inc.
Colson Construction, Inc.
Custom Pools
Bud Dropps Construction
lrris Eide Construction
,ene Eldeen Construction
Formic° Construction
Joe Herzog
Landshapes, Inc.
John L. Laurent & Associates
Nostalgic Homes
Patio Village, Inc.
Peterson & Associates
Pools, Inc.
Red White & Blue Builders
Royal Oaks Development
D. L. Russell Company
Sticks and Stones Design
Valley Pools, Inc
Van Eeckhout Building
yelp Construction
Wrase Builders, Inc.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Fair Air Mechanical
Kraemer Heating
Northwestern Service, Inc.
GAS FITTER
Kraemer Heating
Northwestern Service, Inc.
PLUMBING
Wayne Burville Plumbing
Heritage Plumbing
Robert B. Hill Company
WATER SOFTENER
Twin City Lindsey
VENDING
Theisen Vending
CIGARETTE
Thern Vending
CARNIVAL
Factory Outlet
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the, licensed activity.
The Oaks Business Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 17-85 1-PUD-3-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof. •
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 3-85-
1-2-Park District (hereinafter "PUD 5-85-I-2-Park").
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 4, 1985, entered into between
Steiner Development, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's
Agreement") and that certain Owner's Supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated
as of June 4, 1985, entered into between Braun, Kaiser, and Company and the City of
Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Supplement"). The Developer's Agreement and Supplement
contain the terms and conditions of PUD 3-85-I-2-Park, and are hereby made a part
hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD 3-85-I-2-Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide
Plan of the City.
B. PUD 3-85-I-2-Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable
and unified environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of
the City Code, which are contained in PUD 3-85-I-2-Park, are
justified by the design of the development described therein.
D. PUD 3-85-I-2-Park is of sufficient size, composition, and
arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is
feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent
unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and
hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Planned Unit Development 3-85-I-2-Park District, and the legal descriptions of land
in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph
B, shall be and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
.Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 21st day of May, 1985, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of
June, 1985.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Outlot A, BRAUNS ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota
The Oaks Business Center
PUD-DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1985, by
Steiner Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development District
Review for 16.88 acres and Zoning District Amendment from the Rural District to the
1-2 Park District for 13.68 acres for construction of three buildings for
office/warehouse purposes, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more
fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said
acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property:"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #17-85-PUD-
3-85, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and
maintenance of said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated May 17, 1985, reviewed and approved by
the City Council on May 21, 1985, and attached hereto as Exhibit 8,
subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain the
property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property.
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
1#9./6
or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
4. Concurrent with, and as part of, the final plat submission by the
Developer to the City, Developgr shall dedicate to the City Outlot
A, as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto, in accordance with the
terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
5. Prior to issuance of any building permit upon the property,
Developer shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the
Director's approval of color samples of the brick, brick-faced
block, and metal panels. Upon approval by the Director of Planning,
Developer agrees to employ, or cause to be employed, those exterior
materials listed above, as approved by the Director of Planning.
6. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
Prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property.
7. Developer agrees to confine grading to that area of the property
within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B. Developer
shall place snow fencing at the construction limits within the
wooded areas prior to any grading upon the property.
Prior to issuance of any building permit for the property, Developer
shall submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of a replacement plan for all trees removed, damaged, or
destroyed outside of the construction area. Developer further
agrees that said trees shall be replaced by similar tree species,
diameter inch for diameter inch (i.e. a Red Oak 12 inches in
diameter may be replaced by three Red Oaks four inches in diameter).
The trees used for replacement shall be no less than three inches in
diameter.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall
construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
8. Concurrent with building construction, Developer agrees to
construct, or cause to be constructed, an eight-foot wide bituminous
trail along the west property line and a bituminous connection from
the site to said eight-foot wide trail, both as depicted on Exhibit
B, attached hereto.
9. In conjunction with this development, Valley View Road street
improvements and watermain improvements will be necessary.
Provisions regarding special assessment procedures are delineated in
Exhibit C, attached hereto, and said provisions are considered the
appropriate methods for proceeding with the work. Developer agrees
to submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
approval of a petition, or approved alternate method of security for
the road construction, prior to release by the City of the final
plat.
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT
TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
STEINER , INC. DEVELOPMENT
AND THE 4 '
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1985, by
and between Brauns, Kaiser, and Company, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "Owners," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as
"City:"
For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance #17-85-
PUD-3-85-I-2-Park changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from Rural to
PUD-3-85-I-2-Park as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement
entered into as of June 4, 1985, by and between Steiner Development, Inc., and City,
Owners agree with the City as follows:
1. If Steiner Development, Inc., fails to proceed in accordance with
the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner
shall not oppose the rezoning of the property to Rural.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owners,
their successors, heirs, and assigns of the property.
3. If the Owners transfer such property, owners shall obtain an
agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree
to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
BRAUNS and KAISER COMPANY
By
Its
1 ai2
The Oaks Business Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 854-129
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE 17-85-PUD-3-85 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 17-85-PUD-3-85 was adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of
June, 1985;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 17-85-PUD-3-85, which
is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that
said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of
said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a
body type no smaller than brevier or eight-point type, as defined in
Minn. Stat. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office
of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance
shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 17-85-PUD-3-85 shall be recorded in the ordinance
book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B
herein, within 20 days after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City CleTk--
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 17-85-PUD-3-85
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNOSOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Sunmary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of
Valley View Road at Golden Triangle Drive, known as the Oaks Business Center, from
the Rural District to the PUD 3-85-I-2-Park District, subject to the terms and
conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,
gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/John D. Frane
/s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1985.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
/A ).0
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
FROM:
Carol M. Foy, Landscape Architect
DATE:
May 30, 1985
SUBJECT:
Change Orders Reflecting Increased Cost on Franlo Road Park
Grading Contract
Currently, the 20 acre Frani° Road Park site is approximately 75% complete.
Two soccer fields, the softball field, two tennis courts, road and two parking
lots have been graded with topsoil placed. Additionally, the rock base has
been placed on all future hard surfaced areas.
During construction, staff encountered several areas which required extra work
on the part of the contractor to ensure the structure integrity of all hard
surfaced areas. Change order number 2 reflects the extra work required to
subcut portions of the road, tennis courts and parking lots in order to remove
excessive amounts of topsoil and clay. This work, recommended by Braun
Engineering, amounted to an extra excavation of 5449 cubic yards, at $1.18 per
cubic yard contract unit price for a total of $6,429.82.
Change order number 3 also reflects an improvement for the maintenance of
future pavement areas. By oversizing the aggregate base materials by one foot
along all future pavement edges, there is increased support for the edges, and
less maintenance problems are likely to occur. The original contract estimate
did not include this oversizing, therefore, the extra 372.03 tons necessary
for oversizing and improving the pavement design amounted to $2,567.01.
Between these two change orders, the contract amount will increase by
$8,996.83 or 8.5%
In an attempt to conserve funds, staff has recommended an adjustment to the
design of the parking lot and tennis courts at Eden Valley Park. This slight
modifiction does not change the function or standard sizes of these
facilities, but will yield a decrease of approximately 250 cubic yards of base
material, for a savings of $1,850.
CMF:md
riga
THE„SITY-01 E/(yli'lJEMINNESOTA PRRRED PA
t‘l
N.G, INC
Uk,111.11t%
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
MAY 24, 1985
PROJECT: Grading at Frani° and Eden Valley Park
TO: Preferred Paving/Bruce Anderson
You are hereby directed to make the following changes to your Contract for th
e
above referenced project.
NATURE OF WORK
Extra excavation and backfill of poor soils found in roadbed and parking
lot areas.
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES:
1. Extra excavation in roadbed:
4708 cubic yards @ $1.18 per cubic yard $5,555.44
2. Extra yards of soft spots found in parking lot areas:
741 cubic yards @ $1.18 per cubic yard 874.38
SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT:
Contract total amount prior to this Change Order----$105,551.00
Increase resulting from this Change Order 6,429.82
Total $111,580,82
THE ABOVE CHANGE ORDERS ARE APPROVED: THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED:
DATE i tqic
DATE
gr l P1,2 5
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
MAY 24, 1985
PROJECT: Grading at Franlo and Eden Valley Park
TO: Preferred Paving/Bruce Anderson
You are hereby directed to make the following change
s
t
o
y
o
u
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
above referenced project.
NATURE OF WORK
Increase roadbed aggregate width by 2' for future pavement edg
e
stabilization.
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES:
Increase roadbed base width by 2'.
372.03 tons aggregate @ $6.90 per ton
SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT:
$2,567.01
Contract total prior to this Change Order
Increase resulting from this Change Order
111,980.82
2,567.01
Total $114,547.83
THE ABOVE CHANGE ORDERS ARE APPROVED:
T,H5,CIIY—OP-EDE"?.PRAI 4131 MINNESOTA
BY 1,----r1 v-44
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED:
(51v
PREF RRED PAVING, INC.
BY
DATE Illect f 1:7
DATELMC_ tet,PC
igA3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-135
AMENDING RESOLUTION 85-10 (FEE RESOLUTION)
BE IT RESOLVED that Section 3.12 be added to Resolution
No. 85-10 as follows:
3.12 Charges for Tax Exempt Financing
$800 application fee per each transaction
1/8 of 1% on the unpaid principle balance
at the end of each 12 month period.
Effective for projects receiving inducement resolutions
after May 21, 1985.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST
John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-127
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF SOUTHWEST CROSSINGS BY VANTAGE COMPANIES
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the
Southwest Crossings PUD Development by Vantage Companies and considered their
request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the
City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on June 4, 1985;
NOW, THEREFORE, BY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. The Southwest Crossings'PUD Development by Vantage Companies, being
in Hennepin County, Minnesota, is legally described as outlined in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Development approval as
outlined in the plans dated April 15, 1985.
3. That the POD Development meet the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated May 20, 1985.
1985.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 4th day of June,
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John U. Frne, City CleA
OAS
804 4
k2
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: May 10, 1985
PROJECT: Southwest Crossing Master Plan
APPLICANT/
Pt OWNER: Vantage Companies
LOCATION: North of 1-494, west of Highway #169, sout
h
o
f
N
i
n
e
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
,
a
n
d
east of the Vikings training facility.
•
REQUEST: Planned Unit Development Concept appro
v
a
l
o
n
1
0
6
a
c
r
e
s
,
f
o
r
a
mixture of office and retail uses total
l
i
n
g
1
.
6
2
6
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
q
u
a
r
e
feet.
Summary II rt 1!
In addition to the request for the 4
concept approval of 1.6 million
square feet of office and commercial
uses on approximately 106 acres of
land, the proponent has identified
the following requested public
decisions: (1) raise the water
level in Smetana Lake up to four
feet in accordance with the master
plan of the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District; (2) construct a
left-turn stacking lane from north-
bound Prairie Center Drive to the
land area bounded by Prairie Center
Drive, Highway #169, and 1-494; (3)
permit the construction of Viking
Drive extension from Prairie Center
Drive to Highway #169; (4) permit
the construction of three permanent
park identification signs; (5)
permit Floor Area Ratios in excess
of the ordinance requirements for C-
Regional Service zoning up to 0.69,
and for Office zoning a Floor Area
Ratio up to 0.75; (6) permit a
maximum building height in both the
Office and C-Regional Service zoning
districts up to 120 feet; and, (7)
permit filling within the floodplain
area in the eastern portion of the
project.
Trr
f;
-,„--
I
- REG • PK 804 2
PROPOSED SITE -
' c
r
CT
j Al.
ARLA LOCAT2N MAP
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 2 May 10, 1985
The proposed land uses appear to be in the most appropri
a
t
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
(See Attachment A). Office and commercial uses make sen
s
e
a
l
o
n
g
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
0
4
9
4
a
n
d
Highway 0169 because of their visibility and access. Of
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
N
i
n
e
M
i
l
e
Creek also make sense because of the opportunity to take
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
v
i
e
w
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
the natural areas, and multi-story buildings, with small
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
s
,
c
a
n
minimize the impact on the natural features, including
s
t
e
e
p
s
l
o
p
e
s
a
n
d
w
o
o
d
e
d
areas. Sites 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, and 18 could be co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
sensitive lots, requiring special attention to site plann
i
n
g
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
i
t
i
n
g
of buildings to retain, as much as possible, the existing
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
o
f
each of the parcels.
Portions of this site have previously been dedicated to
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
s
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
o
p
e
n
space along Smetana Lake and Nine Mile Creek. In additio
n
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
d
s
t
o
establish conservation easements over proposed Outlot
s
C
a
n
d
G
.
O
u
t
l
o
t
C
w
a
s
a
heavily forested red oak stand, preserved as part of t
h
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
"
h
i
g
h
-
tech" buildings on Sites 13 and 14. Proposed Outlot G i
s
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
o
a
k
w
o
o
d
e
d
k
n
o
l
l
in the southeast portion of the site, adjacent to future
G
o
l
d
e
n
T
r
i
a
n
g
l
e
R
o
a
d
.
Overall, the intensity of land uses proposed in variou
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
m
a
k
e
sense. The highest intensity land uses are propose
d
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
l
e
v
e
l
previously graded open sites adjacent to 1-494 and Hig
h
w
a
y
0
1
6
9
.
L
o
w
e
r
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
land uses are proposed on the eastern portion of the site
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
k
e
s
e
n
s
e
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to retain as much of the natural character as possible.
Taller buildings with higher a Floor Area Ratio within t
h
e
M
a
j
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
A
r
e
a
a
n
d
next to 1-494 are consistent with the City's Major Center A
r
e
a
p
o
l
i
c
y
.
Review of Floor Area Ratio and height variances shoul
d
b
e
e
x
a
m
i
n
e
d
o
n
a
s
i
t
e
specific basis concurrent with rezoning and platting reques
t
s
.
The eastern and northwestern portions of the site are s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
e
e
p
slopes and extensive tree cover. Any development within
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
alteration of the natural land form and tree loss. The ma
s
s
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
i
s
h
e
l
p
f
u
l
to evaluate the extent of tree loss, and we do know t
h
a
t
t
r
e
e
l
o
s
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
extensive. Mass grading in these areas, especially Site
s
1
1
,
1
2
,
1
5
,
1
6
,
1
7
,
a
n
d
18, should not be approved at this time. The decision to gr
a
d
e
i
n
h
e
a
v
i
l
y
f
o
r
e
s
t
e
d
area should be postponed until such time as more detaile
d
s
i
t
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
is available, which would include a detailed tree inventor
y
,
l
o
c
a
t
i
n
g
a
l
l
t
r
e
e
s
i
n
excess of twelve inches in diameter.
The raising of the water level on Smetana Lake up to
f
o
u
r
f
e
e
t
i
s
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
to
approval by the Department of Natural Resources and th
e
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
M
o
r
e
detailed information is necessary to evaluate the exten
t
o
f
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
adjacent roadways and affected properties before a decis
i
o
n
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
a
d
e
.
A
l
t
h
o
u
g
h
Vantage's proposal is for reimbursement by the City and
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
t
h
e
r
e
currently is no mechanism whereby they can be reimbursed
.
V
a
n
t
a
g
e
h
a
s
t
h
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
making the necessary improvements now, or waiting for th
e
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
City to get this project into their Capital Improvemen
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
M
u
c
h
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
of this improvement could be born by the Watershed Distr
i
c
t
.
Total p.m. peak trips expected to be generated by this pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
4
7
6
(
1
4
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
)
less than anticipated by the BRW traffic study. The con
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
l
e
f
t
-
t
u
r
n
stacking lane from Prairie Center Drive into the propos
e
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
i
t
e
s
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
)4:1
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 3 May 10, 1985
extension of Viking Drive to Highway #169 makes sense; however,
t
h
e
s
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
should be incorporated into the traffic model constructed by B
.
R
.
W
.
a
n
d
a
l
l
potential traffic impacts analyzed before a final decision is made.
The request for park identification signage should be evaluat
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
'
compliance with City ordinance and submittal of detailed signage pack
a
g
e
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Up to 18 per cent fill is proposed within the floodplain area.
F
i
l
l
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
floodplain is subject to approval by the Watershed District. A deci
s
i
o
n
t
o
f
i
l
l
i
n
the floodplain should be based upon an examination of more detaile
d
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Information including a detailed grading plan.
The proposed exchange of land area for woodland easements to allow
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
Site 18 has merit considering that the front side of the oak wooded
k
n
o
l
l
f
a
c
i
n
g
1
-
494 has the heaviest vegetative cover and better speciman trees tha
n
t
h
e
b
a
c
k
s
i
d
e
of the hill. The decision to change the woodland easement line shou
l
d
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
submittal of detailed site plan in this area including a detailed tr
e
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
.
Background
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this site for a mixture of land
u
s
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
Regional Commercial, Office, and Industrial. The Comprehensive Gu
i
d
e
P
l
a
n
d
e
p
i
c
t
s
surrounding future land uses as Low Density Residential, High Den
s
i
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
and Industrial to the north, Office and Industrial land use to the
e
a
s
t
,
O
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
Regional Commercial land uses to the south, and Office and Regiona
l
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
uses to the west.
In 1984, the City approved two projects for Southwest Crossing, in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
2
4
4
,
0
0
0
square foot, five-story, office building on Site 1, and four, one-s
t
o
r
y
,
"
h
i
g
h
-
t
e
c
h
"
buildings on Sites 13 and 14. The "high-tech" buildings were zoned
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
t
o
permit light assembly, and variances were granted to allow more th
a
n
5
0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
office occupancy.
Existing Site Conditions
The Southwest Crossing site can be divided into three general areas
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
i
r
o
w
n
natural characteristics. These areas would include the west end of
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
(
w
e
s
t
of Prairie Center Drive), central portion of the site (between Prair
i
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
and the sedimentation ponds), and the east end (east of the sediment
p
o
n
d
s
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
of the Vikings training facility (See Attachment 8).
The west end of the project has been previously graded and con
t
a
i
n
s
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
stockpiled soil. The northern portion of this area has slopes in e
x
c
e
s
s
o
f
1
5
p
e
r
cent. From a high point at elevation 910, the site slopes steeply
i
n
a
n
e
a
s
t
e
r
l
y
direction, to an elevation of approximately 870 adjacent to Prairi
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
.
The northern portion of this site also has scattered groupings of ma
t
u
r
e
o
a
k
t
r
e
e
s
.
The central portion of this site has been previously graded with
m
i
n
i
m
a
l
s
l
o
p
e
s
between one to five per cent. This portion of the site is bordered
b
y
a
s
t
e
e
p
r
i
d
g
e
line (a 30-foot drop) to Smetana Lake. There is no existing significant natural
vegetation in the central portion of the project.
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 4 May 10, 1985
The eastern end of the site is heavily wooded (mostly white and red oak) and has a
rolling topography. The low point of this area is at Smetana Lake at elevation 833,
and the high point is a very steep wooded knoll at elevation 933. Areas adjacent to
1-494 are relatively level. A tree study, conducted by the City Forester in 1981,
identified six different vegetative zones. The study identifies the general tree
types and size of trees. A detailed tree inventory in these forested areas,
identifying the type, size, and location of trees, has not been completed. Staff
does know from this study that the size of the oak trees, in general, are between 18
to 24 inches in diameter on the average, and there are numerous large scattered red
oak trees between 30 to 36 inches in diameter.
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
In 1975, the State Environmental Quality Board declared a finding of no significant
impact for a Condon/Naegele Planned Unit Development on approximately 166 acres of
land, totalling approximately 1.6 million square feet of building area. Since the
size of the Southwest Crossing Concept Plan is at 1.6 million square feet, and is
consistent with the original Environmental Assessment Worksheet threshholds
approved, no new Environmental Assessment Worksheet will be required.
Concept Plan
The Planned Unit Development Concept Plan proposes a mixture of commercial, office,
and industrial uses across the site. (See Attachment A) Commercial uses proposed
on the extreme western portion of the site will include restaurants, retail
shopping, a hotel, and two small office buildings. Commercial and office usage
would be on Sites 2 through 6.
The central portion of the site is proposed for office use. There is an office
building of approximately 244,000 square feet currently under construction on Site
1. Sites 8, 9, and 10 are proposed for five and six-story buildings, totalling
385,000 square feet.
The eastern portion of this site will contain a mixture of office and industrial
uses. Four industrial buildings are approved on Sites 13 and 14. Sites 11, 12, 15,
16, 17, and 18, are proposed for two to six-story office buildings.
In general, the Planned Unit Development Concept Plan contains 175,260 square feet
of commercial uses, including a 750-room hotel, 1,374,000 square feet of office
uses, and 89,364 square feet of industrial uses. The Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan is approximately 84 per cent office, 11 per cent retail, and 5 per cent
industrial.
The gross Floor Area Ratio of the site based on approximately 106 acres of land, is
0.34. The net Floor Area Ratio of the project, excluding areas identified as
outlots, (permanent open space) would be 0.4. For comparison purposes, the Code
would allow a 0.3 Floor Area Ratio for one-story office buildings, and 0.5 Floor
Area Ratio for multi-story buildings. For commercial zoning, the Code would allow a
0.2 Floor Area Ratio fnr a one-story building, and a 0.4 Floor Area Ratio for multi-
story commercial buildings. The Planned Unit Development Concept Plan indicates net
Floor Area Ratios requested for each of the sites. In general, higher Floor Area
Ratios are requested for the western and central portions of the site, adjacent to
1-494 and Highway #169. Floor Areas Ratios on the eastern portion of the site are
lower. The average net Floor Area Ratio for the western portion of the project is
I 2.2
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 5 May 10, 1985
0.49, and the average net Floor Area Ratio for the eastern portion of the project is
0.33.
Higher Floor Area Ratios on the western portion of the site may have merit
considering the impact of the major highways and since the sites have been
previously graded. Lower Floor Area Ratios on the eastern portion of the project
make sense considering the amount of potential impact on trees and the rolling
topography. Typically, Floor Area Ratio variances are evaluated at the time of
development stage planning, which would coincide with review of detailed site and
building plans accompanying a rezoning, platting, and/or site plan review request.
Variances under a Planned Unit Development can only occur with a Planned Unit
Development District Review. The extent to which Floor Area Ratio variances can be
considered depends upon a performance review of the building and site plans, and
compliance with other restrictions of the Zoning Ordinance, which would include
setbacks and parking requirements. If other aspects of the Code can be complied
with, and if minimal site impacts on natural features can be demonstrated, then the
request for increased Floor Area Ratio may have merit.
The proponent is also requesting height variances up to a maximum of 120 feet.
Height variances are being requested on all lots except Lots 4, 6, and 7, which are
proposed for one-story retail sales or restaurant usage, and Lots 13 and 14, which
are one-story "high-tech" buildings previously approved by the City. Most of the
tallest buildings are proposed along Highway #494, which makes sense, considering
the impact of 1-494 and the prominence of this site in the Major Center Area.
Building heights of 120 feet for Site 12, and 98 feet for Site 18, seem
inappropriate, considering the impact on Nine Mile Creek and the heavily wooded
areas on that portion of the project. Height variances should be examined on a site
specific performance basis in relationship to the massiveness of the building, type
of building materials, and extent of physical and visual impacts on existing natural
characteristics and surrounding uses.
Mass Grading
There are two primary areas on the site where mass grading is proposed. (See
Attachment C) One area is on the extreme northwestern portion of the property,
proposed for retail and office usage between Highway #169, Prairie Center Drive, and
the extension of Viking Drive. The other area proposed for mass grading is on the
eastern edge of the project, between the sedimentation ponds and the Vikings
training facility.
The existing topography on the western edge of the site, previously referred to
above, is marked by steep grade changes with a vertical drop in elevation of
approximately 40 feet across the site. To accommodate the proposed building plans,
for retail and restaurant uses along Highway #169, the site will have to be mass
graded to provide level building pads. Although the retail uses make sense along
Highway 4169, the mass grading of the property will result in considerable tree
loss. Any development on this site will require extensive grading, and tree loss
may not be avoidable. Submittal of more detailed information relative to building
locations, access, and parking areas, may suggest ways in which many of the oak
trees might he retained. Consideration of grading of this area should he dealt with
at the time of review of a detailed proposal.
The eastern portion of the site can he characterized by steep slopes and heavily
wooded areas. Proposed Outlot G, containing 5.63 acres, is proposed as a woodland
ic9„?
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 6 May 10, 1985
preserve area and represents the high wooded knoll on the Southwest Crossing site.
The front side of the knoll will remain undisturbed. The back side of the knoll,
facing Nine Mile Creek, will be altered significantly in order to accommodate a
building pad elevation of 865 on Site 18 and will also require a floodplain
encroachment. Site 18 was not included in the original tree study conducted by the
City Forester. Proposed grading will dramatically change the shape of the hill. To
retain more of the natural form of the hill, the proposed regrading could be
softened to follow along the existing contours of the hill. This would mean that
the proposed grading, within the powerline easement, where minimal tree cover
currently exists, should be extended into proposed building Site 18. Proposed
grading adjacent to Nine Mile Creek should also be softened to 3/1 slopes. Special
reforestation treatment will also be necessary so that the regraded portions will
appear to be more natural adjacent to the creek. This will require extensive
planting of lowland vegetation.
Mass grading on proposed Sites 15, 16, and 17, will remove the majority of existing
natural vegetation which is primarily red and white oak of 18 to 24-inch caliper
average. Grading on proposed building Site 11 will remove nearly all of the
existing vegetation. There are scattered red oaks between 30 to 36-inch caliper.
There are two building pads proposed on Site 11. The building pad adjacent to
Viking Drive is for the building, and the building pad adjacent to Nine Mile Creek
is for structured parking.
Mass grading on proposed Site 12 will result in significant tree loss, which are
mostly white oak and basswood between 18 to 24 inches in diameter. There will also
be filling in the One-hundred Year Floodplain.
Flood Plain
The mass grading plan proposes fill up to 18 per cent in the One Hundred Year Flood
Plain. Fill in flood plain areas should be examined concurrent with detailed site
plan reviews. The Watershed District must approve filling in the flood plain areas.
Woodland Easements
The 1975 Condon/Naegele Planned Unit Development established permanent woodland
easements where shown on Attachment D. The master plan proposes a change in the
easement area to allow development on Site 18 in exchange for a larger easement area
over the high oak wooded knoll (proposed Outlot G). Trees on the back side of the
knoll are not as significant in terms of size andmassing compared to the south
facing side. This exchange of easement area has merit, but should be subject to
detailed site plan review and provision of a detailed tree inventory to more
accurately evaluate where the woodland easement area should be.
Traffic
A traffic study, prepared by 8RW, commissioned by the City, has recently been
completed in response to Commission and Council concerns about the traffic impacts
of the Technology Park and Vantage projects reviewed by the Planning Commission in
1984.
10.3 I
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 7 May 10, 1985
The traffic study indicates that, based upon ultimate deve
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
,
traffic generated would exceed capacities of roadways and in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
e
v
e
n
w
i
t
h
the following recommended improvements:
1. Geometric improvements at 15 intersections.
2. A wider bridge on County Road #18 over 1-494.
3. A wider bridge on Prairie Center Drive/Valley View Road over
T
r
u
n
k
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
#5.
4. A new Washington Avenue bridge over 1-494.
5. Peak hour trip generation of all land uses reduced by 20 per c
e
n
t
.
The Southwest Crossing Concept Plan is within Traffic Assign
m
e
n
t
Z
o
n
e
s
(
T
A
Z
1
1
,
1
2
,
13, and 14). land uses in TA/ 12, 13, and 14, are dif
f
e
r
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
w
h
a
t
w
a
s
envisioned in the BRW study. No land use changes occur in
t
h
e
T
A
Z
1
1
.
W
i
t
h
t
h
e
changes in land uses, P.M. peak hour traffic generated
i
s
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
.
F
o
r
T
A
Z
numbers 12, 13, and 14, the BRW study projected a P.M. traffi
c
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
3
,
3
0
3
t
r
i
p
s
.
Total P.M. peak traffic generated by the concept plan
i
s
2
,
8
2
7
t
r
i
p
s
.
T
h
e
difference is 476 trips, or 14% reduction. This reduction is
d
u
e
t
o
l
e
s
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
different land uses including office/showroom, warehouse, re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
.
The proponent is requesting two road improvements in conne
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
plan approval, including the construction of the left-turn la
n
e
o
f
f
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Drive, which would permit future access into the restaurant
a
n
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
sites and the extension of Viking Drive. The decision to prov
i
d
e
a
l
e
f
t
-
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
Into the proposed retail Sites 6 and 7, should be postponed un
t
i
l
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
p
l
a
n
s
o
f
the shopping center and restaurant site, including drivewa
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
s
,
i
s
provided for review. In concept, the left turn lane makes
s
e
n
s
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
adequate room within the road right-of-way to make this impr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
e
left turn lane request should be included along with the exte
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
V
i
k
i
n
g
D
r
i
v
e
between Prairie Center Drive and Highway #169 in the traffic
m
o
d
e
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
b
y
BRW and all of the impacts of these changes analyzed. Viking
D
r
i
v
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
Prairie Center Drive to Highway #169-212 makes sense and will
f
o
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
previously identified in past Planned Unit Development subm
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
i
s
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
will be necessary to allow access to Sites 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, an
d
7
.
T
h
e
V
i
k
i
n
g
D
r
i
v
e
intersection with Highway #169 will align opposite the private
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
i
n
t
o
the Brock Residence Inn site.
Since Technology Park concept plan by Hoyt Development is in
t
h
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
by the Planning Commission, and since the proponent intend
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
G
o
l
d
e
n
Triangle Drive from the north end of the Technology Park site
t
o
N
i
n
e
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
,
i
t
would be appropriate to complete the bridge crossing and
G
o
l
d
e
n
T
r
i
a
n
g
l
e
D
r
i
v
e
through the Southwest Crossing site at the same time.
Utilities
Sewer and water service is currently constructed and located
w
i
t
h
i
n
r
o
a
d
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
way for existing Viking Drive from Prairie Center Drive over
t
o
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
Sewer and water service is also installed at this time acr
o
s
s
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
0.,?
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 8 May 10, 1985
sites from Prairie Center Drive to Highway #169. Additional utility development
will be required to service Sites 12, 15, 16, and 13. Utility service could be
extended into the sites in conjunction with the extension of Golden Triangle Road.
Parks, Open Space, and Pedestrian Systems
The City's overall trail system, as depicted on Attachment E, indicates the extent
of trails proposed on this site and the surrounding area. Southwest Crossing
proposes to construct, in 1985, an eight-foot wide bituminus trail from Valley View
Road along the north side of Viking Drive, following the back side of office Sites
8, 9, and 10, along the edge of Smetana Lake over to the sedimentation ponds near
the east end of Smetana Lake. Since trails are proposed on the overall system along
Nine Mile Creek and Viking Drive, the concept plan should be revised to indicate
provisions for the eight-foot wide bituminus path along Nine Mile Creek, and the
five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Viking Drive and be
constructed concurrent with the extension of Golden Triangle Drive.
Land has previously been dedicated for the western and central portions of the
Planned Unit Development, but Cash Park Fee will be charged for that portion of the
Planned Unit Development east of the sedimentation ponds.
Storm Drainage
Though no overall storm water run-off plan has been provided, it is assumed that the
storm water run-off will flow through a series of storm water lines in Viking Drive
and Golden Triangle Drive, and/or overland from each of the sites into Nine Mile
Creek and Smetana Lake.
The proponents are requesting that the water level on Lake Smetana be raised up to
four feet from the existing high water level mark, at approximately 834, to a new
elevation of 838. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the Department of
Natural Resources have identified, in their long range plans, the raising of the
water level of Smetana Lake in order to increase the water retention capacity of the
lake as part of their overall flood control and water management. Southwest
Crossing would like to initiate this program in 1985. Southwest Crossing would
propose that the City and Southwest Crossing provide the engineering work and erect
the control structure to accomplish this goal at the eastern edge of Smetana Lake.
Southwest Crossing txuld provide the funding to accomplish this and the following
related projects, including: condemnation of land along the edge of Smetana Lake
that would be placed permanently under water as a result of this project (if
necessary); raising a portion of Smetana Lake Road and Valley View Road that would
be permanently flooded as a result of this project; and, extension of sanitary sewer
service to the existing residents along Smetana Lake Road that are currently using
septic systems. Southwest Crossing intends to provide these funds with the
understanding that Nine Mile Creek Watershed District would reimburse the venture
for the cost of the control structure and land condemnation, and that the City would
reimburse the venture for road improvements to Valley View Road, and that private
land owners, upon resale of their property, would reimburse the venture for the cost
of the sewer hook-up and other improvements to the property.
Although this is Vantage's proposal, there is no mechanism whereby they can be
reimbursed. If they can wait for the Watershed District to get to this project in
their normal Capital Improvements Program, much of the cost could be born the
Watershed District.
0,33
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 9 May 10, 1985
The raising of the water level, construction of the control structures, and expanded
floodplain area, are subject to approval by the Department of Natural Resources and
the Watershed District.
Signage
Three park identification signs are proposed on the master plan. Code would allow
one area identification sign per development. This means that the office and
industrial buildings under construction could have one sign each and the balance of
the site could have one sign. Signage details need to be submitted for Staff
review.
Shoreland Management Ordinance
Proposed Lots 10, 11, 12, 15, and 18, will be directly impacted by the Shoreland
Management Ordinance. For proposed office development adjacent to a Nature
Environmental Water, the following provisions will apply:
1. Minimum lot size is ten acres.
2. Minimum lot width at building line is 200 feet. •
3. Minimum lot width at Normal Ordinary High Water Mark is 200 feet.
4. Minimum setback from Normal Ordinary High Water Mark is 200 feet.
5. Maximum impervious surface coverage is 30 per cent.
6. Maximum building height is 30 feet.
We do know from the proponents master plan narrative that they will be requesting
variances from all provisions of the shoreland ordinance for these lots in the
future.
Conclusion
To achieve the 20% reduction as recoMmended in the BRW study, an additional 6%
reduction (184 trips) in p.m. peak traffic should occur. There are several ways to
reduce traffic including less building square footage, a different land use mix, and
traffic management. Reducing the amount of office by 110,000 square feet would be
equivalent to 6% reduction. Since the concept plan is approximately 1.6 million
square feet with an anticipated build out period of 10-15 years, and the full
impacts of traffic would not he apparent for some time, one alternative would be to
approve a base square footage of 1.516 million square feet with consideration given
up to a maximum of 1.626 million square feet, with each parcel coming back for
future zoning approval having to meet specific performance criteria such as:
1. Traffic information which would indicate that actual traffic counts are less
than anticipated by the current study.
2. Traffic managment programs such as ride sharing and staggered work shifts
that would reduce p.m. peak traffic.
19,0
Southwest Crossing Master Plan 10 . May 10, 1985
3. Sensitive grading and minimal tree loss in wooded areas.
4. Higher intensity development which would not precipitate ordinary setback
variances to building and parking.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept on 106 acres
for office, commercial, and industrial uses for conceptual approval of land use
types and general location, with a base square footage of 1.516 million square feet,
with consideration given up to 1.626 million square feet, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report, dated May 10, 1985, with the exception of the
following specific requests, which would be reviewed in detail at the time of
submission of individual site plans and rezoning requests:
1. Height and floor area ratio variances - these may be in keeping with Major
Center Area policies; however, approval should be dependent upon review of
specific site plan details which should not precipitate ordinary setback
variances to building and parking.
2. Shoreland variances.
3. Grading in heavily wooded areas - grading is not appropriate at this scale.
• Approval would be dependent upon specific site plan review added by a
detailed tree inventory.
4. Filling up to a 20 per cent encroachment into the Floodplain area subject to
grading details, tree removal, and Watershed District approval.
5. Three area identification signs - the concept of three area identification
signs is valid, subject to specific details identifying size, location, and
style of lettering.
6. Setbacks to building and parking areas.
7. Subject to an analysis of traffic impacts based upon the traffic model
constructed by 8RW, the construction of a left-turn lane off Prairie Center
Drive to future restaurant and commercial facilities, and the extension of
Viking Drive between Prairie Center Drive and Highway #169.
8. Raising of the Smetana Lake elevation from 834 to 838 subject to the
Department of Natural Resources and Watershed District approval and more
detailed information to evaluate impacts upon adjoining land area with the
understanding that the costs for necessary improvements to be at the expense
of Vantage Corporation with no committment for reimbursement.
9. Construction of a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Viking Drive and an
eight-foot wide bituminus trail along Nine Mile Creek.
10. Submittal of a design framework manual especially for the commercial areas,
which would identify cannon elements such as architecture, building
materials, landscaping, screening, signage, and lighting details.
11. Cash park fees shall be applicable to all development east of the
sedimentation ponds.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob Lambert, Director of Community ServicerRt-
May 23,1985
Southwest Crossing Master Plan
The Planning Department has provided a very comprehensive Planning Staff
Report dated May 10th regarding Vantage Companies PUD Concept Approval request
for a mixture of office and retail uses on 166 acres. The Planning Staff
Report outlines many concerns with the project due to the proposed grading in
heavily wooded areas, filling up to 20Z of the floodplain and requests for
variances from the Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Planning Staff did
recommend approval of the PhD Concept subject to the recommendations of the
May 10th Planning Staff Report with the exception of a number of specific
requests which would be reviewed in detail at the time of submission of
individual site plans and rezoning requests.
The Community Services Department recognizes that much of the site has already
been graded and there are previous approvals regarding grading and filling
_that this plan is following; however, the Community Services Department has
specific concerns regarding this concept plan.
The previous concept for development along the Nine-Mile Creek corridor has
been to preserve the creek corridor valley as much as possible in its natural
condition. Specific emphasis on preservation has been related to the steep
oak wooded hills on the north and south side of the creek. The proposed
concept plan would eliminate the natural character of the creek valley by
placing parking ramps and multi-story buildings within 50' of the creek.
Although, the proposal depicts a high quality office development along the
south side of Smetana Lake and Nine-Mile Creek, this proposal departs from the
previous concept of maintaining the creek corridor in its natural condition.
The jogging and walking paths proposed along Nine-Mile Creek and around the
lake would be directly adjacent to parking lots and buildings and along
manicured lawns, rather than adjacent to a natural area. Each type of trail
can offer a very positive experience and can be an amenity enjoyed by hundredt
of people; however, there is a clear difference in the type of trail and the
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and City Council should be
aware that this change is being proposed.
The Planning Staff wrestled with the philosophy of which amenity is the
greater resource, the protection of the high wooded oak hill or the protection
of the back of that same hill with lesser quality of trees and the
preservation of a portion of the south side of the creek corridor. The
Planning Staff felt that due to the visability from 494 the high oak hill
probably is a more valuable amenity to the City of Eden Prairie than the back
Side of the hill and a short portion of the Nine-Mile Creek valley due to the
Hoyt Development Proposal on the north side of Nine-Mile Creek and the
proposed development by Vantage Corporation both to the cast and to the west
of the preservation area.
The Shoreland Management Ordinance requires a building setback of 200' from a
natural environment lake and 150 from general development waters such as
Nine-Mile Creek. Even these controls would effectively eliminate the natural
condition of the Nine-Mile Creek valley.
The developer is requesting a concept approval on this 166 acre site in order
to find out if the City has any major problems with the direction their
general proposal is heading. The Community Services staff concur with the
Planning Staff that staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept for
office/ commercial/industrial uses; however, the Community Services staff does
not believe it is appropriate to give conceptual approval for building
locations that require significant variances from the Shoreland Management
Ordinance, significant filling of the floodplain and grading in heavily
wooded areas without specific review of grading plans for each.of those sites.
The Community Services staff is also hesitant to recommend approval of a
change in the woodland preservation area prior to detailed information on
grading plans and the number of significant trees that would be saved by
revising the preservation area.
The Shoreline of Smetana Lake and Nine-Mile Creek from the holding ponds east
to the Vikings is still a rather pristine area even with the intrusion of the
NSP easement and towers. The City of Eden Prairie should look very carefully
at the impact this proposal will make on that creek valley.
The graphic depicting the proposed building locations also shows the existing
creek floodplain to the north and west and the industrial area to the north.
The Community Servies Staff would urge the Council to attempt to mantain as
much of the natural creek valley as possible through this intensely developed
area.
BL;rnd
t21
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #85-128
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF JUHL PACIFIC,
FOR OPUS CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Juhl Pacific, for Opus Corporation, da
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
2
4
,
1935, consisting of 4.5 acres into one lot for construction of a 61,00
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
o
o
t
office/warehouse, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is f
o
u
n
d
t
o
b
e
i
n
conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platti
n
g
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
,
and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of June, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
P.3Z
Pj;: OPUS CORPOUTION
May 24, 1985
Reynolds Printing Company, Inc.
7071 Shady Oak Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Attention: Bob Reynolds
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
Opus Corporation, on behalf of Juhl
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
U
.
S
.
A
.
,
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
s
t
o
construct an earthen berm on the com
m
o
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
o
f
L
o
t
1
,
and Lot 2 of Block 1, Edenvale 9th
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
b
e
r
m
w
i
l
l
b
e
constructed per the attached Opus Co
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
P
C
3
,
dated 5/24/85, and the top landscape
d
p
e
r
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
P
L
1
,
—dated 5/24/85.
Opus Corporation will be responsibl
e
s
o
l
e
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
a
r
t
h
w
o
r
k
required in the construction of this
b
e
r
m
a
n
d
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
f
the top of the berm per the attached
p
l
a
n
s
.
A
l
l
o
t
h
e
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
shall be completed by the respective p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with their approved landscape plan on
f
i
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Eden
Prairie. The maintenance of all landscaping sh
a
l
l
b
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
‘owners responsibility and expense.
Opus Corporation agrees to indemnify
y
o
u
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
a
n
y
c
l
a
i
m
of loss
or damage asserted against you which
a
r
i
s
e
s
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
o
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
construction activities performed by Op
u
s
.
Construction of the berm will be com
p
l
e
t
e
o
n
o
r
a
b
o
u
t
A
u
g
u
s
t
1
,
1985. Construction activities will b
e
c
o
n
f
i
n
e
d
t
o
2
5
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
the base of the berm.
Please signify your consent to these pro
p
o
s
e
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
of Opus Corporation by signing where
indicated and returning one
copy for our files.
Sincerely, Accepted by:
OPUS CORPORATION
REYNOLDS PRINTING COMPANY, INC.
David A. Runt, P.E.
Project Engineer
Date
Enclosures
DAH/aw
10,;`)
OPUS CORPORATION
• 11.1,1 /1:. • 14 14,
114 24, 1985
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United State
s
Valley View Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Attention: Kaye Schumacher
Dear Mr. Schumacher:
Opus Corporation, on behalf of Juhl Pacific U.S
.
A
.
,
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
s
t
o
construct an earthen berm on the common propert
y
l
i
n
e
o
f
L
o
t
1
,
and Lot 2 of Block 1, Edenvale 9th Addition.
T
h
e
b
e
r
m
w
i
l
l
b
e
constructed per the attached Opus Corporation g
r
a
d
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
P
C
3
,
dated 5/24/85, and the top landscaped per the La
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
P
L
1
,
dated 5/24/85.
Opus Corporation will be responsible solely f
o
r
t
h
e
e
a
r
t
h
w
o
r
k
required in the construction of this berm and t
h
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
f
the top of the berm per the attached plans. All
o
t
h
e
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
shall be completed by the respective property ow
n
e
r
s
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with their approved landscape plan on file with
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
e
n
Prairie. The maintenance of all landscaping sha
l
l
b
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
owners responsibility and expense.
Opus Corporation agrees to indemnify you against
a
n
y
c
l
a
i
m
o
f
l
o
s
s
or damage asserted against you which arises dir
e
c
t
l
y
o
u
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
construction activities performed by Opus.
Construction of the berm will be complete on o
r
a
b
o
u
t
A
u
g
u
s
t
1
,
1985. Construction activities will be confined
t
o
2
5
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
the base of the berm.
Please signify your consent to these proposed constr
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
of Opus Corporation by signing where indicated
a
n
d
r
e
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
o
n
e
copy ior our files.
Sincerely, Accepted by:
OPUS CORPORATION
n LU EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY
OF THE UNITED STATES
David A. Hunt, P E.
Project Engineer Date
Enclosures
DAH/aw
274'
PLY.;
:11.1 n 1.
81-1
PROPOSED SITE
, •....-',1'.: ::::..., 4 •--
.... '1 1: ! '
171 : ,
r I n el. < .1 , ,q,1,81- 22 .1 ! ',Lt.-77 -c
,P1-6qMMI (*C
7,7-7.-i;77.n•••,,‘„ \n,/"Li tz RF .,,,. I
‘ I-7- ----
1 \\
R :r1-2.5
I
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Planning Cooflission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
TIOUGH:
Chris [tiger, Director of Planning
DATE:
May 10, 1985
PROJECT:
Juhl Pacific
LOCATION:
Southeast quadrant of Valley View Road and Equitable Driv
e
APPLICANT: Opus Corporation
Equitable Life Insurance Company
FEE OWNER: Equitable Life Insurance Company
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on 4.50 ac
r
e
s
for a one-story, 63,639 square foot industrial building.
2. Preliminary Plat of 4.5 acres into one lot.
Background
This 4.5-acre site is part of the
Edenvale 9th Addition, a 100-acre
Planned Unit Development, previously
reviewed by the Planning Commission
in 1982. At that time, the
Commission reviewed and approved a
request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change from Residential and Com-
mercial to Office and Industrial. A
Planned Unit Development Concept and
a preliminary plat subdividing the
property into large out lots and road
right-of-way were approved at that
time. The concept plan shows
office uses around the perimeter of
the site facing Purgatory Creek and
the interior of the site for light
industrial uses.
The Comprehensive Guide Plan
currently designates this specific
site as Office or Industrial land
use. This site is in the center of
the Fdonvale 9th Addition, and
surrounding future Lind uses are
A1172A LOCAIICA MAP
Juhl Pacific 2 May 10, 1985
also guided for Office and Industrial use to the south of Val
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
Medium Density Residential land uses to the north across Valley
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
.
Site Plan
— —
The site plan involves the construction of a one-story, 24-foot
h
i
g
h
,
6
3
,
6
4
5
s
q
u
a
r
e
foot office warehouse building. The site is being developed at
a
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
of 0.289 based upon a building footprint of 55,863 square fe
e
t
.
T
h
e
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
Ratio, including the second-story element for the office portio
n
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
would be 0.329. Code would allow a Floor Area Ratio for one-st
o
r
y
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
u
p
t
o
0.3 and for multi-story buildings up to 0.5. Building and
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
m
e
e
t
current minimum setbacks for 1-2 Park zoning.
The building contains 49,080 square feet for the Juhl Pacific o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
1
4
,
5
6
5
square feet for future lease space. Parking requirements are ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
the actual use for Juhl Pacific at five spaces per 1,000 for
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
one-half space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, for t
h
e
w
a
r
e
h
o
u
s
e
a
r
e
a
o
r
a total of 83 spaces. Parking requirements for the lease space
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
1/3 office, at five spaces per 1,000, 1/3 assembly, at three sp
a
c
e
s
p
e
r
1
,
0
0
0
,
a
n
d
1/3 warehouse, at one-half space per 1,000, or a total of 36 sp
a
c
e
s
.
T
o
t
a
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
requirements for the building would be 119 parking spaces. A
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
1
1
4
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
spaces are provided on-site, including 14 proof-of-parking s
p
a
c
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
should he revised to provide an additional six parking spaces f
o
r
1
1
9
s
p
a
c
e
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
may include areas for proof-of-parking.
Grading
This site has been previously graded in accordance with the app
r
o
v
e
d
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
for the Fdenvale Industrial Park 9th Addition. This site is rela
t
i
v
e
l
y
l
e
v
e
l
,
w
i
t
h
berming along Valley View Road which can serve as a visual
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
multiple family uses to the north. The revised grading plan indicates increased
berm height along Valley View Road and Equitable Drive which hel
p
s
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
overall WISS and height of the building. Initially along Valley View Road the
r
e
were two berms with a low point between Section lines C & D. The re
v
i
s
e
d
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
plan shows a continuation of the berm at an elevation 893. Along E
q
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
D
r
i
v
e
,
the setback area to parking has been increased from 30 to 36 feet. T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
a
l
l
o
w
the berm to be increased from four to six feet in height at a slope
o
f
2
.
7
5
/
1
.
T
h
e
Commission should note that the section lines have not been revised ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
new grading plan with increased berm height and reduced height of th
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
b
y
two feet. The height of the building visible along the section
l
i
n
e
s
w
i
l
l
v
a
r
y
between nine to twelve feet in height. Berming along the northeast
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
property will not effectively reduce the height of the building mass
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
r
e
is a 45-foot setback to parking along the east property line, this wou
l
d
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
a
berm of up to nine feet in height. The increase in berm height, suppl
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
intense coniferous plantings, should help reduce the massiveness an
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
t
h
e
building when viewed from the east along Valley View Road. Sight lines
a
l
s
o
indicate views from the second and third floors of the Edenvale Apa
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
.
S
i
g
h
t
lines indicate that the entire building would be visible. Plan
t
i
n
g
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
necessary to break up the building mass from those views.
Architecture
Primary building materials will be brick, metal panel, and glass. The building has
an office appearance when viewed from the northwest corner of the
s
i
t
e
o
n
l
y
.
T
h
e
IALa
Juhl Pacific 3 May 10, 1985
building has a definite warehouse appearance fr
o
m
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
,
c
a
s
t
,
s
o
u
t
h
,
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
sides of the building. Brick will ,be the prima
r
y
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
o
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
,
east, and west elevations. Rock faced block i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
where the loading docks are located. Brick shou
l
d
b
e
w
r
a
p
p
e
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
terminate at the first loading bay.
Screening of roof top mechanical equipment shoul
d
b
e
h
a
n
d
l
e
d
-
b
y
g
r
o
u
p
i
n
g
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
units together and screening with material arch
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
l
y
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
l
t
o
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
as required by Code. In this case, the use
o
f
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
p
r
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
m
e
t
a
l
a
s
proposed for the slanted roof of the office . portion of the building would be
acceptable. Approval of final details would be
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Landscaaing
A landscape plan has been submitted which depi
c
t
s
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
,
s
i
z
e
,
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
proposed plant materials. For a building of this
s
i
z
e
,
t
h
e
n
e
w
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
would require the provision of 397 caliper inch
e
s
.
A
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
3
3
1
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
are provided on-site. The landscape plan should b
e
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
6
6
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
caliper inches. Staff would suggest that the m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
inches required be coniferous trees and planted
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
a
n
d
e
a
s
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
lines to help break up views of the building mass
f
r
o
m
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
land uses. The size of the proposed plantin
g
s
o
f
c
o
n
i
f
e
r
o
u
s
t
r
e
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
locations should be a minimum of twelve feet in h
e
i
g
h
t
.
The developer's agreement for the tdenvale Exe
c
u
t
i
v
e
P
a
r
k
9
t
h
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
that a total of 504 caliper inches of trees mus
t
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
s
e
t
r
e
e
s
must be no less than 21/4 caliper inches in size a
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
l
o
n
g
public street boulevards within the project.
T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
a
m
o
u
n
t
t
o
f
i
v
e
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
inches per acre or for this 4.5-acre site a
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
2
2
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
.
T
h
e
landscape plan should be revised to include 22 a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
a
l
i
p
e
r
i
n
c
h
e
s
.
Screening of the dock-high doors has been the fo
c
u
s
o
f
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
b
l
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
o
v
e
r
the last several weeks with the proponents. Att
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
s
i
g
h
t
l
i
n
e
s
which would require the greatest amount of sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
a
l
o
n
g
Equitable Drive should screen the loading fac
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
a
t
s
i
g
h
t
l
i
n
e
.
T
h
e
proposed arborvitae plantings along the sigh
t
l
i
n
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
E
q
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
warehouse buildings, to the east of the project
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
s
c
r
e
e
n
t
h
e
v
i
e
w
of the overhead doors due to the size of propo
s
e
d
p
l
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
spacing of the plant materials which will allo
w
s
i
g
h
t
l
i
n
e
w
i
n
d
o
w
s
u
n
t
i
l
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
t
materials reach full maturity. Staff has disc
u
s
s
e
d
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
w
i
t
h
the proponents to screen the overhead doors, in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
d
o
o
r
s
farther into the building in a manner similar
t
o
R
e
y
n
o
l
d
s
P
r
i
n
t
i
n
g
,
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
number of overhead doors, and reducing the dep
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
m
o
r
e
green area along the south property line. The
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
overhead doors may be a combination of the above recomtlendations.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be provided to this s
i
t
e
b
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
e
w
e
r
and water limes in Uguitar)le Drive. The Fire D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
h
a
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
and recommonds two options available for adequ
a
t
e
f
i
r
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
includo eithr serving the building with a six-in
c
h
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
a
s
d
e
p
i
c
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
south side of the building, or provide fire
h
y
d
r
a
n
t
s
a
t
e
a
c
h
o
f
t
h
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
entrances. It is also recommended that the propo
n
e
n
t
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a yard post indicator
1 V -I
Juhl Pacific 4 May 10, 1985
along the six-inch water service to the building. A
y
a
r
d
p
o
s
t
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
i
s
a
standard fire requirement which allows the opportunity
f
o
r
t
h
e
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
shut off water to the building in the event of fires or w
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
b
r
e
a
k
s
.
Storm water run-off is proposed to sheet drain across
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
i
n
t
o
c
a
t
c
h
basins. From that point, storm water run-off will flow
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
p
i
p
e
and connect to an 18-inch storm water line in Equitable D
r
i
v
e
.
Lighti
No lighting details, nor an overall lighting plan, have
b
e
e
n
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
o
f
the size of the Edenvale Executive Park, it is impo
r
t
a
n
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
b
e
c
o
n
y
m
n
elements. The proponent should submit an overall ligh
t
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
f
o
r
review including lighting details.
Signage
No signage details, nor an overall signage program, have b
e
e
n
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Common elements such as signage can help unify a large d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
should submit an overall signage program with details for
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
S
i
g
n
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
o
f
a comparable size, style, coloring, and lettering size.
Pedestrian Systems
As a condition of approval of the developer's agreement f
o
r
t
h
e
E
d
e
n
v
a
l
e
E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
Park 9th Addition, sidewalks are to be constructed a
l
o
n
g
E
q
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
D
r
i
v
e
a
n
d
Executive Drive. The sidewalk along Equitable Drive would
b
e
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
side of the road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Screening of the dock high doors is an unresolved issue
a
t
t
h
i
s
t
i
m
e
.
S
t
a
f
f
f
e
e
l
s
that there is a better way to screen, rather than rel
y
i
n
g
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
p
l
a
n
t
materials. The proposed plantings will have "windows" f
o
r
s
o
r
e
t
i
m
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
u
n
t
i
l
plants have reached maturity and grown closer together.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
p
l
a
n
t
s
d
o
n
o
t
always grow uniformly and may be damaged by snow storag
e
s
i
n
c
e
o
n
l
y
a
t
w
e
l
v
e
-
f
o
o
t
wide space is provided adjacent to the driveway.
Three alternatives were suggested in the Staff Repo
r
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
overhead doors, reducing the number of doors and reducin
g
t
h
e
d
e
p
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
to allow more green area along the south property line f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
e
r
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
n
plantings.
Staff would recommend that either the development plans b
e
r
e
t
u
r
n
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
for revisions, or the request for zoning and platting be
d
e
n
i
e
d
.
f n •• f•.1. 1,41•;•l•
• (.1../1....n • SI I %1 IVii .1•,1
..-': - \ \ .17•Vt41.1
.-:.: '• • • to., • v
C ..,. \ .".n'..
-: ..*: '• .4 -I.,. ...1,
• —• • --
..1".: --•—r-
i . _ k,...11 , , . , • . LI . / ; I 't
1
1-1 ! '.! 2!-F"
i l - t.ii., n ,./ c_T.I.tu,.:;n .,..._./ :A
4
.1 1. -.... OM! on ••n•nnn••n[n•
.. Ill it i: 't ;.! ''''.11.11.1i.."::::'11"Lf
11 1 1 .—n 'IL-.- L ..„...:••:.!--,L
I.
,,,, 1 ,
i
0
Ei
1-- (3)
nn•nn
AffAtiitliNT A •
t9'LlSV({: NO LOA1)(KU AKCA/,'
VAC 85-4
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
May 30, 1985
Vacation of St. John's Drive
As a result of a previous decision by City Council, a public hearing is
scheduled for the June 4 meeting to determine if St. John's Drive should be
vacated. Based on the representations of the spokesmen for the Homeowner's
Association, it would appear that this is the desire of the entire
development. However, so that there would not be any misunderstandings in the
. future, I would suggest that along with the vacation, a formalized
maintenance agreement should be developed spelling out City and private
responsibilities.
Currently, the City plows snow, performs street repair and enforces traffic
regulations. Once this has become a private roadway, none of these functions
will be performed by City Staff. Therefore, it would be well to identify
these items and place them into the written record.
Finally, I would note that it will be necessary to maintain an easement over
virtually the entire roadway. We have City utilities that will still be
public and easements will be required for access.
EAD:sg
AclCo
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-1$3
VACATION OF ST. JOHN'S DRIVE IN
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4
OF SECTION 3
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain right-of-way described as
follows:
St. John's Drive from Baker Road (County Road 60) to the South line of
the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 3, Township
116, Range 22 as platted in St. John's Wood. St. John's Wood Second
Addition and St. John's Wood Seventh Addition, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held an June 4, 1985, after due notice was
published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way is not necessary
and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said right-of-way as above described is hei.eby vacated (subject to
utility easements).
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Completion of the proceedings
in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Irene, Clerk
VAC 85-3
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-131
VACATION OF RIGHT-Or-WAY AND
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN
RIDGEWOOD WEST
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain right-of-way and drainage and
utility easements described as follows:
Saratoga Court as dedicated on the recorded plat of Ridgewood West,
which lies northerly of Wellington Drive.
Drainage and utility easements as dedicated on Lots 45 through 51,
inclusive, Block 1, and Lots 6 through 12, inclusive, Block 3,
Ridgewood West.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 4, 1985, after due notice was
published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way and drainage and
utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public,
therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said right-of-way and drainage and utility easements as above
described are hereby vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Completion of the proceedings
in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary O. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAI141E
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-132
VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE
OLD SHADY OAK ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
IN NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4
OF SECTION 2, T 116 R 22
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain right-of-way described as
follows:
Tract D, RLS 1581
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 4, 1985, after due notice was
published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way is not necessary
and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said right-of-way as above described is he'reby vacated (subject to
utility easement).
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a Notice of Completion of the proceedings
In accordance with M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
o t(9
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: 5-30-85
RE: Preliminary approval MIDB'S for Evergreen Properties $4,850,000 -
Resolution 85-136
The proponent wishes to construct 91,000 S.F. of office warehouse in 3
buildings to be leased to others. The project is located at 169 and
Prairie Center Drive. Employment is estimated to be about 400 persons.
A second reading of the zoning ordinance was held on May 21st. Equity
In the project is $500,000. This project is "eligible" to receive part
of the City's remaining $7,400,000 of MIDB cap. The resolution in your
packet does not provide for an allocation. Should the council wish to
make an allocation we have a resolution which makes an allocation of
$4,850,000 of the City's cap.
/az
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, KINNESOTA
Application for
Industrial Development Bond Pro,act Financing
1. APPLICANT: Evergreen Properties
a) Business Name - Evergreen Properties
b) Business Address - 11200 West 78th Street
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
c) Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship,
etc.) - Partnership
d) State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota
el) Authorized Representative - Dennis J. Doyle
f) Phone - 944-5810
2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS:
a) George Welsh
7037 Willow Creek Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
b) Dennis Doyle
4121 Randall Avenue
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL
PRODUCTS,
ETC.:
The Welsh Companies is a full service real estate delvelopmen
t
company to include; Real Estate Development, Construction, R
e
a
l
Estate Leasing and Sales, and Property Management.
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
a) Location and intended use: The property is located at the
intersection of Highway 169 and Prairie Center Drive
immediately to the east of the current Bryant Lake Business
Center - Phase I. The project is an Office Tech/Service cent
e
r
building.
b) Present ownership of project site: Welsh Companies, Inc.
Page two
C) Names and address of architect, engineer, and general
contractor:
Architect: RSP Architects
120 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55401
General Contractor: Welsh Construction Corp.
11200 West 78th Street
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
Land
Construction Contracts
Equipment Acquisition and installation*
Architectural and Engineering
Legal
Interest during Construction
Bond Reserve
Contingencies
Loan Fees
Other
TOTAL
$ 700.00
3,800.00
400.00
70.00
50.00
150.00
50.00
50.00
80.00
_ 50.00
O 5,400.00
*Heating and air conditioning should be included as building costs.
Indicate the kind of equipment to be acquired here.
6. BOND ISSUE:
a) Amount of proposed bond issue - $4,850.000.00
b) Proposed date of sale of bond - June 1, 1985
c) Length of bond issue and proposed maturities - 10 Years
d) Proposed original purchaser of bonds - A local commercial bank
intends to purchase the bond.
e) Name and address of suggested trustee -
f) Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original purchaser
N/A
g) Describe any interim financing sought or available - Interim
financing provided by the end lender.
h) Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing in
addition to bond financing -
I Y",;,2-
Page three
7. BUSINESS PROFILE:
a) Are you located in Eden Prairie? Yes
b) Number of employees in Eden Prairie? 50
i. Before this project:
ii. After this project:
c) Approximate annual sales - $20,000,000.00
d) Length of time in business - 7 years.
1 year in Eden Prairie
e) Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where? No
f) Are you engaged in International Trade? No
8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT(S):
a) List name(s) and location(s) of other industrial development
project(s) in which the Applicant is the owner or a
"substantial user" of the facilities or a ”releated person"
within the meaning of Section 103(b) (6) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
None
b) List all cities in which the Applicant has requested industrial
revenue development financing.
Eden Prairie
c) Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before any
other city for industrial development revenue financing.
None
d) List any city in which the Applicant has been refused
industrial development revenue financing.
None
e) List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant has
acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which final
authorizing the financing has been denied.
None
IAS-3
Page Four
f) If Applicant has been denied industrial development revenue
financing in any other city as identified in (d) or (e),
specify the reason(s) for the denial and the name(s) of
appropriate city officials who have knowledge of the
transaction.
9. NAMES AND ADDRESS OF:
a) Underwriter (If public offering) None
b) Private Placement Purchaser (If private placement)
i If lender will not commit until City has passed iits
preliminary resolution approving the project, submit a
letter from proposed lender that it has an interest in the
offering subject to appropriate City approval and approval
of the Commissioner of Securities.
c) Bond Counsel - Trudy Halle
Briggs & Morgan
First National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
d) Corporate Counsel - Steve Davis
Davis Law Firm
4114 IDS Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
e) Accountant - Melvin Harris
5775 Wayzata Blvd.
Suite 915 Park Place
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
a) Construction start - June 15, 1985
b) Construction completion - June 15, 1986
Page Five
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval
by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial Developement bond financing
does not expressly or impliedly constitute any approval, variance, or
waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning,
building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or
any other law applicable to the property included in this project.
7 -4-.L2A=60__
k Applicant (I -1
BvZEnt ee 0J _114.-4QT 71 ;e" c
Date
11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a) Property is zoned -
b) Present zoning (is) (is not) correct for the intended use.
c) Zoning application received on
for which is correct for the intended
use.
d) Variances required -
City Planner
RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A
COMMERCIAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT
PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION
FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT TO THE
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT
(Evergreen Properties Project)
WHEREAS,
(a) The purpose of Chapter 474, Minnesota
Statutes, known as the Minnesota Municipal Industri
a
l
Development Act (the "Act") as found and determined
b
y
t
h
e
legislature is to promote the welfare of the state
b
y
t
h
e
active attraction and encouragement and developmen
t
o
f
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
-
cally sound industry and commerce to prevent so fa
r
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and ar
e
a
s
o
f
chronic unemployment;
(b) Factors necessitating the active promotion
and development of economically sound industry and
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
a
r
e
the increasing concentration of population in the
m
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
areas and the rapidly rising increase in the amoun
t
a
n
d
c
o
s
t
o
f
governmental services required to meet the needs o
f
t
h
e
increased population and the need for development
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
which will provide an adequate tax base to finance
t
h
e
s
e
increased costs and access to employment opportuni
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
s
u
c
h
population;
(c) The City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie (the "City") has received from Evergreen P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
,
a
partnership organized under the laws of the State
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
(the "Company") a proposal that the City assist in
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
a
Project hereinafter described, through the issuanc
e
o
f
a
Revenue Bond or Bonds or a Revenue Note or Notes h
e
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
referred to in this resolution as "Revenue Bonds"
p
u
r
s
u
a
n
t
t
o
the Act;
(d) The City desires to facilitate the selec-
tive development of the community, retain and impro
v
e
t
h
e
t
a
x
base and help to provide the range of services and
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
opportunities required by the population; and the P
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
assist the City in achieving those objectives. The Pro
j
e
c
t
will help to increase assessed valuation of the City a
n
d
h
e
l
p
maintain a positive relationship between assessed valu
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
debt and enhance the image and reputation of the commun
i
t
y
;
(e) The Project to be financed by the Revenue
Bonds is an approximately 91,000 sq. ft. office/hightec
h
service center facility to be located south of Valley
V
i
e
w
,
West of Highway 169 and north of Interstate Highway 494
a
t
Market Place Drive in Eden Prairie and consists of the
acquisition of land and the construction of buildings an
d
improvements thereon and the installation of equipment t
h
e
r
e
i
n
to be initially owned and operated by the Company, and w
i
l
l
result in the employment of additional persons to work w
i
t
h
i
n
the new facilities;
(0 The City has been advised by representa-
tives of Company that conventional, commercial financin
g
t
o
p
a
y
the capital cost of the Project is available only on a l
i
m
i
t
e
d
basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the econo
m
i
c
feasibility of operating the Project would be significan
t
l
y
reduced, but Company has also advised this Council that
t
h
e
Project would not be undertaken but for the availability
o
f
industrial bond financing;
(g) A public hearing on the Project was held on
, 1985, after notice was published, and materials
made available for public inspection at the City Hall, a
l
l
a
s
required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivi
s
i
o
n
7
b
at which public hearing all those appearing who so desi
r
e
d
t
o
speak were heard;
(h) No public official of the City has either a
direct or indirect financial interest in the Project no
r
w
i
l
l
any public official either directly or indirectly benef
i
t
financially from the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
t
h
e
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Council'hereby gives preliminary approval to t
h
e
proposal of Company that the City undertake the Project
pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Develop
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
(Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes), consisting of the acqu
i
-
sition, construction and equipping of facilities within t
h
e
City pursuant to Company's specifications suitable for
t
h
e
operations described above to be initially owned and o
p
e
r
a
t
e
d
IDS)
by the Company and pursuant to a revenue agreement between the
City and Company upon such terms and conditions with provisions
for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce
income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal
of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the maximum aggregate
principal amount of $4,850,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act
to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the
Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire
interest of Company therein to be mortgaged to the purchaser of
the Revenue Bonds; and the City hereby Undertakes preliminarily
to issue its Revenue Bonds in accordance with such terms and
conditions;
2. On the basis of information available to this Council
it appears, and the Council hereby finds, that the Project
constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in
connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises
engaged in any business within the meaning of Subdivision la of
Section 474.02 of the Act; that the Project furthers the
purposes stated in Section 474.01, Minnesota Statutes; that the
Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of
industrial bond financing; that the availability of the
financing under the Act and willingness of the City to furnish
such financing will be a substantial inducement to Company to
undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if
undertaken, will be to encourage the development of
economically sound industry and commerce, to assist in the
prevention of the emergence of blighted and marginal land, to
help prevent chronic unemployment, to help the City retain and
improve the tax base and to provide the range of service and
employment opportunities required by the population, to help
prevent the movement of talented and educated persons out of
the state and to areas within the State where their services
may not be as effectively used, to promote more intensive
development and use of land within the City and eventually to
increase the tax base of the community;
3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by
the City subject to the approval of the Project by the
Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority or such
other state officer having authority to grant approval (the
"Authority"), and subject to final approval by this Council,
Company, and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ulti-
mate details of the financing of the Project;
4. In accordance with Subdivision 7a of Section 474.01
Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized
and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the
Authority requesting its approval, and other officers,
employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to
provide the Authority with such preliminary information as it
may require;
5. Company has agreed and it is hereby determined that
any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with tne
financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried
to completion and whether or not approved by the Authority will
be paid by Company;
6. Briggs and horgan, Professional Association, acting as
bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and
review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to
consult with the City Attorney, Company and the purchaser of
the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and
other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the
covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and
to submit such documents to the Council for final approval;
7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents pre-
pared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any
municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived
from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this
purpose. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien
or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds
of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the
payment thereof, nor snail the City be subject to any liability
thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the
right to compel any exercise of the taxing per of the City to
pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the
interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any
property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in
substance that the Revenue Bonus, including interest thereon,
is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pleaged to the
payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt
of tae City within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory limitation;
B. It is further found, determined and declared that it
is the present intent of the City Council to authorize the
issuance and sale of the Revenue Bonds but this Resolution does
not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City
will issue the Revenue Bonds as requested by the Company. The
City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from
participation and accordingly not to issue the Revenue Bonds,
or issue the Revenue Bonds in an amount less than the total
amount requested, should the City at any time prior to issuance
thereof determine that it is in the best interests of the City
not to issue the Revenue Bonds, or to issue the Bonds in a
lesser amount, or should the parties to the transaction be
unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any
of the documents required for the transaction. Additionally,
the City is an entitlement issuer within the meaning of the
Act; this Resolution does not and shall not be deemed to con-
stitute an agreement on the part of the City to allocate a
portion of its entitlement allocation under the Act to the
Project, and this Resolution and the preliminary approval of
the City set forth herein are contingent upon either an
allocation or such entitlement allocation by the City of an
.additional allocation of bonding authority from the Authority
with respect to the Project in an amount equal to or greater
than the principal amount of the Revenue Bonds prior to issu-
ance and sale of the Revenue Bonds.
9. This resolution is sub3eet to the condition that no
later than December 31, 1985 the City and the Company shall
have agreed to mutually acceptable terns and conditions of a
revenue agreement, the Revenue Bonds and of the other
instruments and proceedings relatin4 to the Revenue Bonds, and
their issuance and sale and closing on the purchase of the
-Revenue Bonds shall have occurred. If such agreement does not
take place within that time or any extension thereof and the
Revenue Bonds are not sold within such time, this resolution
shall expire and be of no further force or effect unless
expressly extended by the City Council; and
10. This approval is also contingent upon receipt by the
City from the Company on or before August 28, 1985 of IA of the
amount of the Revenue Bonds (or such lesser amount as the City
may agree should the amount of the Revenue Bonds be reduced)
which will be used to reimburse the City for the application
fee ueposited by the City with the Authority in order to
preserve the issuance autnority of the City with respect to the
Revenue Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
Such deposit shall be returned to the Company when and if the
Authority returns such deposit to the City.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, this uay of , 1985.
May or
Attest;
City Clerk
TO: Mayor and Council
.FROM: John Frane
DATE: 5-30-85
RE: Preliminary approval of M1DB'S for Hagen Systems (Rialto)
$2,500,000 - Resolution 85-137
The proponent wishes to construct a 59,000 S.F. office building in
City West on Outlot C, City West Second next to Prime Tech Park.
Employment is estimated to be 70 persons. The project is expected
to be on the Planning Commission's next meeting. The project is not
yet eligible to receive part of the City's cap therefor resolution
85-137 does not make an allocation. Equity is estimated to be
$200,000. Resolution 85-137 is included for your consideration.
0,(,)1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Application for
Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
1. APPLICANT:
a. Business Name - Rialto Investments
b. Business Address - 8100 Wayzata Blvd., Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55426
C. Business Form - Partnership
d. State of Incorporation or organization - Minnesota
e. Authorized Representative - Al Hagen, President
Rick Hagen, Treasurer
f. Phone - (612) 546-3351
2. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PRINCIPALS:
a. Alvin H. Hagen
b. Richard J. Hagen
c. Thomas A. Hagen
d. Steven R. Peterson
3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS,
ETC.:
Rialto Investments is a partnership made up of major
stockholders of Hagen Systems, Inc. The main purpose is to
make investments in real estate and provide facilities for
Hagen Systems, Inc. Hagen Systems, Inc. leases the property
from the partnership.
Hagen Systems, Inc. was established in 1965. Their
objective was to market and service business equipment. The
founding philosophy of the company was, and continues to be,
"to provide superior products and professional customer
service and support." In 1972, after numerous requests from
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development
Bond Project Financing
Page 2
a large and growing customer base, The Hagen Computer System
was brought into being with FIVE major criteria:
1. That it be expandable and flexible to fulfill user
growth requirements.
2. That it be capable of incorporating new products and
technologies as they are released to the market (thus
eliminating the obsolescence factor).
3. That all necessary service and support be provided by
Hagen Systems, Inc. providing the customer with a
single source vendor.
4. That the system be able to handle different and varied
data processing tasks simultaneously.
5. That the final product be "turnkey" in nature,
providing the customer with a cost/effective computer,
and one that is immediately usable upon delivery.
The success of this philosophy speaks for itself. Today,
Hagen Systems, Inc. employs more than sixty (60) people and has
recently exhausted their present facilities which were purchased
just four (4) years ago. Because of the success experienced with
Twin City firms, Hagen Systems, Inc. launched a program for
nation-wide distribution.
The key to this growth is simple--"customer service and
dedication to improving both the software and hardware product".
This point is most clearing defined by the fact that the entire
product line supports the same software.
Expanding the system is easy and cost effective. All that
is required is to change or add components, rather than replace
the entire system.
The growth of Hagen Systems had been dependent on how many
custom programs they were able to develop to meet the needs of
various businesses in the "Greater Minneapolis area."
Some of these firms are:
1. Distributors
2. Commercial Printers
3. Sports Clubs
4. Dairies
5. Travel Agencies
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development
Bond Project Financing
Page 3
6. Certified Public Accountants
7. Contractors
8. Catalogue Sales
9. Manufacturers
10. Fuel Oil Dealers.
The success experienced in two of these markets led them to
take a market survey of Commercial Printers and Travel Agencies.
In July of 1981, Hagen Systems, Inc. completed their
research and development of two products. These products are
defined as the Printer's Management System (PMS) and the Travel
Management System (TMS), which also includes the Package Tour
System (PTS).
Hagen Systems, Inc. has installed the PMS in many of the
larger printing firms in the Twin Cities. During their research,
they attended many trade shows to demonstrate their PMS. The
system was well received. As a result, sales offices were
opened in Chicago, Illinois; Boston, Massachusetts; Tampa,
Florida and Los Angeles, California. This provided nation-wide
distribution and support. The enlarged distribution system has
required Hagen Systems, Inc. to enlarge its operation at the home
office by hiring additional personnel and make plans for larger
facilities.
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
a. Location and intended use: on approximately two and
one-half acres of Outlet C, City West Second
Addition, between City West Parkway and Loop Road,
adjoining Prime Tech Park.
b. Present ownership of project site: MRTT Joint Venture
c. Names and addresses of architect, engineer, and general
contractor:
5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
Land
Construction Contracts
Architectural and Engineering
Legal
Contingencies
Loan Fees
Furniture and Equipment
Construction Interest
Other (Assessments and taxes)
$ 632,000.00
1,300,000.00
70,000.00
27,500.00
120,000.00
27,500.00
200,000.00
50,000.00
76,500.00
TOTAL $2,503,500.00
DIA
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development
Bond Project Financing
Page 4
6. BOND ISSUE:
a. Amount of proposed bond issue - $2,500,000.00
b. Proposed date of sale of bonds - July 1, 1985
c. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities -
25 years, 10 year mandatory put date with remarketing
d. Proposed original purchaser of bonds - Piper, Jaf fray &
Hopwood, Incorporated is Placement Agent
e. Name and address of suggested trustee - Norwest Bank
Minneapolis, N.A., 8th and Marquette, Minneapolis, MN
f. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original
purchaser
g. Describe any interim financing sought or available -
None
h. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing
in addition to bond financing - None
7. BUSINESS PROFILE:
a. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? No
b. Number of employees in Eden Prairie?
i. Before this project: None
ii. After this project: 70
c. Approximate annual sales - $10,000,000.00
d. Length of time in business - 20 years on April 1, 1985
In Eden Prairie - None
e. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where?
No plants.
Sales Offices in: Woburn, Massachusetts
Chicago, Illinois
Tampa, Florida
Los Angeles, California
f. Are you engaged in international trade?
No
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development
Bond Project Financing
Page 5
8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS:
a. List the names and locations of other industrial
development projects in which the Applicant is the
owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a
"related person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
None.
b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested
industrial revenue development financing.
None.
c. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has
before any other city for industrial development
revenue financing.
None.
d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused
industrial development revenue financing.
None.
e. List any city (and the project name) where the
Applicant has acquired preliminary approval to proceed,
but in which final approval authorizing the financing
has been denied.
None.
f. If Applicant has been denied industrial development
revenue financing in any other city as identified in
(d) or (3), specify the reasons for the denial and the
names of appropriate city officials who have knowledge
of the transaction.
None.
9. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF:
a. Underwriter (if public offering)
b. Private Placement Agent: Piper, Jaf fray & Hopwood
Incorporated, Piper Jaffray Tower, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55402
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development
Bond Project Financing
Page 6
9. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF: (Continued)
c. Bond Counsel - Faegre & Benson (Walter J. Duffy, Jr.)
2300 Multifoods Tower
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
d. Corporate Counsel - Faeore & Benson
(Charles E. Underbrink)
2300 Multifoods Tower
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
e. Accountant - Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co.
600 County Road 18
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426
10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
a. Construction start - July 1, 1985.
b. Construction completion - January 1, 1986.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Al Hagen 546-3351
The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or
disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial
Development bond financing does not expressly or impliedly
constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any providion or
requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule or
ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, or any other law
applicable to the property included in this project.
Rialto Investments/Hagen Systems, Inc.
Applicant
By
Date
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development
Bond Project Financing
Page 7
11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
a. Property is zoned -
b. Present zoning (is) (is not) correct for the intended
use.
c. Zoning application received on
for which is correct for the
intended use.
d. Variances required -
City Planner
RIALTO INVESTMENTS
8100 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
May , 1985
Mr. John Frame
Finance Director
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343
Dear Sir:
The undersigned is an applicant for Industrial
Development Revenue Bond financing of the City of Eden Prairie.
In connection with the application accompanying this letter, the
applicant agrees to pay all costs incurred by the City in
connection with this application and/or the issuance of bonds
pursuant thereto whether or not the project contemplated is
approved by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development
Authority; whether or not the project is carried to completion;
whether or not the bonds or operative instruments are executed.
President
Rialto Investments
os o
RIALTO INVESTMENTS
8100 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
May , 1985
Lang, Pauly and Gregerson, Ltd.
4108 IDS Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Dear Sirs:
The undersigned is an applicant for Industrial
Development Revenue Bond financing of the City of Eden Prairie.
I understand that you will be representing the City of Eden
Prairie as legal counsel in connection with the attached
application, including, among other things, review of the
application, participation in drafting and review of appropriate
revenue documents, and closing of the transaction.
The undersigned hereby agrees to pay the City's legal
fees incurred with respect to this application and the issuance
of the bonds whether or not the project contemplated is approved
by the proper state agency; whether or not the project is carried
to completion; and whether or not the bonds or operative instruments
are executed. Charges for legal fees will be paid when billed
and all final charges will be paid prior to or at the closing.
Presiaent
Rialto Investments
v-137
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
BY RIALTO INVESTMENTS UNDER THE MUNICIPAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING
SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE
MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FOR APPROVAL THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, as follows:
1. There has been presented to this Council a pro-
posal by Rialto Investments, a Minnesota general partnership (the
"Partnership") that the City undertake and finance a project
pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act") generally consisting
of the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately
40,000 square foot computer sales, service and training facility
on approximately two and one-half acres of Outlot C, City West
Second Addition, between City West Parkway and Loop Road,
adjoining Prime Tech Park in the City, to be owned by the
Partnership and leased to Hagen Systems, Inc. (the "Project").
The Partnership will enter into a revenue agreement with the City
upon such terms and conditions as are necessary to produce income
and revenues sufficient to pay when due the principal of and the
interest on up to approximately $2,500,000 Industrial Development
Revenue Bonds of the City to be issued pursuant to the Act, to
provide monies for the acquisition, construction and installation
of the Project; and the City will pledge its interest in the
revenue agreement to secure the bonds.
2. As required by the Act, this Council conducted a
public hearing on Tuesday, June 4, 1985 on the proposal to
undertake and finance the Project after publication in the
official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation in the
City of a notice setting forth the time and place of hearing;
stating the general nature of the Project and an estimate of the
principal amount of bonds or other obligations to be issued to
finance the Project; stating that a draft ccpy of the proposed
Application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development
Authority, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is
available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk,
in the City Hall, at all times between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and
4:30 P.M. each day except Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays
to and including the day of hearing; and stating that all parties
who appear at the public hearing shall have an opportunity to
express their views with respect to the proposal. The draft
application to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development
Authority, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto,
was on file and available for public inspection at the place and
times set forth in the notice.
-3-
IA71
3. It is hereby found, determined and declared that
the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of the
Act in that the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof
will be to promote the public welfare by the attraction, encourage-
ment and development of economically sound industry and commerce
so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted
and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the reten-
tion and development of industry to use the available resources
of the community, in order to retain the benefit of its existing
investment in educational and public service facilities; by
halting the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature
age to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human
resources needed as a base for providing governmental services
and facilities; and the more intensive development of land avail-
able in the area to provide a more adequate tax base to finance
the cost of governmental services in the Municipality, county and
school district where the Project is located. In the judgment of
the City Council, based upon the representations of the Partner-
ship, the Project as proposed would not be undertaken by the
Partnership but for the availability of industrial development
bond financing.
4. The Partnership has entered into preliminary
discussions with Piper, Jaffrey & Hopwood Incorporated, as
placement agent, and the placement agent has reported that the
Project and the sale of bonds therefor are feasible.
5. The Partnership has agreed to pay any and all costs
incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or
not the Project is approved by the Minnesota Energy and Economic
Development Authority and whether or not the Project is carried
to completion.
6. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by
the City subject to approval of the Project by the Minnesota
Energy and Economic Development Authority and subject to final
approval by this Council and by the purchasers of any bonds to be
issued as to the ultimate details of the Project and as to the
terms of the bonds.
7. In accordance with Section 474.01, Subd. 7 of the
Act, the Mayor, the City Manager, and such other officers and
representatives of the City as may from time to time be
designated are hereby authorized and directed to submit the
proposal for the Project to the Minnesota Energy and Economic
Development Authority and request its approval thereof, and the
Mayor, the City Manager, and other officers, employees and agents
of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Authority with
such preliminary information as it may require. The Partnership,
Fnegre & Benson as bond counsel, the City Manager, the City
Attorney, and other City officials are also authorized to
initiate the preparation of a proposed loan agreement and such
other documents as may be necessary or appropriate to the Project
so that, when and if the proposed Project is approved by the
Authority and this Council gives its final approval thereto, the
Project may be carried forward expeditiously.
8. $2,500,000 of the City's 1985 entitlement issuance
authority under 1984 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 582, is hereby
allocated to bonds to be issued for the Project. The Partnership
agrees to notify the City immediately if bonds to finance the
Project will not be issued in 1985. The Partnership shall
provide to the City any application deposit required by the
Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development, and the
City shall return the application deposit to the Partnership if,
as and when the application deposit, or a part thereof, is
returned to the City by the Department. Nothing in this para-
graph 9 shall be construed to grant the Project any priority over
other projects for an allocation of the City's entitlement
issuance authority in any year subsequent to 1985. The City
reserves the right to use its entitlement issuance authority for
years after 1985 in any manner this Council, in its discretion,
determines to be in the best interests of the City, and the City
shall not be liable to the Partnership for any such use.
9. The Partnership has agreed to pay directly or
through the City any and all costs incurred by the City in
connection with the project whether or not the project is approved
by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority;
whether or not the project is carried to completion; and whether
or not the bonds or operative instruments are executed.
10. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute
a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the
bonds as requested by the Partnership. The City retains the
right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and
accordingly not issue the bonds should the City at any time prior
to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest
of the City not to issue the bonds or should the parties to the
transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and
conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction.
11. All commitments of the City expressed herein are
subject to the condition that by December 31, 1985 the City and
the Partnership shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms
and conditions of the revenue agreement, the bonds and of the
other instruments and proceedings relating to the bonds and their
issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take
place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof,
and the bonds are not sold within such time, this Resolution
shall expire and be of no further effect.
-5-
gr).3
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: John Frane
DATE: 5-30-85
RE: Preliminary approval of MIDB'S for Hampton Hotel $4,500,000 -
Resolution 85-138
The proponents wish to construct a 120 room hotel at the southwest
corner of 494 and Flying Cloud Drive. Employment is estimated to
be 15 persons. The project is expected to be on the Planning
Commission's next meeting and therefor is not eligible to receive
a part of the City's cap. Resolution 85-138 does not make an
allocation. Equity is estimated to be $500,000. Resolution 85-138
is included for your consideration.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
Application for
Industrial Development or Housing Bond Financing
1. APPLICANT:
A. Business Name: Eden Prairie Hampton Partners
B. Business Address: 7460 Marketplace Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
C. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietor-
ship, etc.): General Partner
D. State of incorporation or organization: Minnesota
E. Authorized Representative: Kenneth E. Nelson
F. Phone: (714) 759-0284
2. NAME(S) AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS:
A. Mitchell A. Anderson
One Magnificent Mile
980 North Michigan, Ste. 1400 (312) 787-3874
Chicago, IL 60611
B. Wallace H. Hosted
7460 Market Place Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(612) 941-4383
C. Kenneth E. Nelson
Three Corporate Plaza, Ste. 202
Newport Beach, CA 92660-7905 (714) 759-0284
Page -2-
3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL
PRODUCTS, ETC.:
Hotel
4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
A. Location and intended use: 7720 Flying Cloud Drive (approx.)
Hotel
B. Present ownership of project site: B.W.K.B. partners
C. Names and address of architect, engineer, and general
contractor:
Green Builders Inc.
3100 S. Sheridan Boulevard
Denver, CO 80227
(303) 922-5581
5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST FOR:
Land
Construction contracts
Equipment acquisition and installation*
Architectural and Engineering
Legal
Interest during construction
Bond reserve
Contingencies
Loan fees
Other
TOTAL
$ 850 000
1,800.000
25 000
500,600
100.000
210000
-0-
120,000
320,000
525,000
$4,500,000
*Heating and air conditioning should be included as building
costs. Indicate the kind of equipment to be acquired here.
6. APPLICANT'S EQUITY IN PROJECT
$500,000
Page -3-
7. BOND ISSUE:
A. Amount of proposed bond issue: $4,500,000
B. Proposed date of sale of bond: May 15; 1985
C. Length of bond issue and proposed maturities:
15 year, 30 year amortization
D. Proposed original purchaser of bonds:
Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
E. Name and address of trustee: Not yet determined.
F. Copy of any agreement between Applicant and original
purchaser:
Not yet written.
G. Describe any interim financing sought or available:
None
H. Describe nature and amount of any permanent financing
in addition to bond financing:
None
8. BUSINESS PROFILE:
A. Are you located in the City of Eden Prairie? Yes
B. Number of employees in Eden Prairie?
1. Before this project: None
IX)
Page -4-
2. After this project? 15 full -time equivalents
C. Approximate annual sales: $1,400,000
D. Length of time in business Less than one year
in Eden Prairie Less than one year
E. Do you have facilities in other locations? If so, where?
No
F. Are you engaged in international trade?
No
9. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CS):
A. [Reference to "Applicant" includes applicant as owner,
substantial user or as a related person within meaning
of Section 103(b)(6) of I.R.C.]. List the name(s) and
location(s) of other industrial development project(s)
in which the Applicant is the owner or a *substantial
user" of the facilities or a "related person".
None
Page -5-
B. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested
industrial revenue development financing.
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
C. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has
before any other city for industrial development
revenue financing.
NIA
D. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused
industrial development revenue financing.
None
E. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant
has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which
final approval authorizing the financing has been denied.
None
Page -6-
F. If Applicant has been denied industrial development
revenue financing in any other city as identified in
(D) Or (E), specify the reason(s) for the denial and
the name(s) of appropriate city officials who have
knowledge of the transaction.
N/A
10. NAMES, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE:
A. Underwriter (if public offering)
1. Name: Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
2. Address: Northwestern Financial Center
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431
3. Telephone Number: (800) 328-6122
B. Private Placement Purchaser (if private placement)
1. Name: N/A
2. Address:
N/A
3. Telephone Number:
N/A
Page -7-
NOTE: If lender will not commit until City
has passed its preliminary resolution
approving the project, submit a letter
from proposed lender that it has an
interest in the offering subject to
appropriate City approval and approval
of the proper state agency.
C. Bond Counsel:
1. Name: Holmes & Graven
2. Address: 470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
3. Telephone Number: (612) 338-1177
D. Corporate Counsel:
1. Name: Godfrey 6 Kahn
2. Address: 780 North Water
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
3. Telephone Number: (414) 273 -3500
E. Accountant:
1. Name: The Shapiro Group
2. Address: 2029 Century Park East
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
3. Telephone Number: (213) 277-4878
Page -8-
11. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
A. Construction start: June 1, 1985
B. Construction completion: December 31, 1985
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval
by the City of Eden Prairie for Industrial Development or Housing bond
financing does not expressly or impliedly constitute any approval,
variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any
zoning, building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Eden
Prairie, or any other law applicable to the property included in this
project.
Kenneth E. Nelson
Three Corporate Plaza
Suite 202
Newport Beach, CA 92660-7905
(714) 759-0284
44 g:ric k 4.-"Ap_ Rr4er s
Applicant '
BY: -
KENNETH E. NELSON
DATE:
fier-5—
Page -9-
12. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
A. Property is zoned: Commercial - Regional Service
B. Present zoning (is)
use.
correct for the intended
C. Zoning application received on NIA
for N/A which is correct for the
intended use.
D. Variances required.
Not yet determined.
City Planner
ar(3
11F.SOLU1ION NO.
/2(
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO
A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT, REFERRING THE PROPOSAL
TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL,
AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, the welfare of the State of Minnesota (the "State") requires
active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically
sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as
possible, emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic unemployment, and it is
the policy of the State to facilitate and encourage action by local government units
to prevent the economic deterioration of such areas to the point where the process
can be reversed only by total redevelopment through the use of local, state and
federal funds derived from taxation, with the attendant necessity of relocating
displaced persons and of duplicating public services in other areas; and
WHEREAS, technological change has caused a shift to a significant degree
In the area of opportunity for educated youth to processing, transporting,
marketing, service and other industries, and unless existing and related industries
are retained and new industries are developed to use the available resources of the
City of Eden Prairie (the "City"), a large part of the existing investment of the
community and of the State as a whole in educational and public service facilities
will be lost, and the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age to
areas where their services may be effectively used and compensated and the
lessening attraction of persons and businesses from other areas for purposes of
industry, commerce and tourism will deprive the City and the State of the
economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental
services and facilities for the remaining population; and
WHEREAS, the increase in the amount and cost of governmental services
has created the need for more intensive development and use of land to provide an
adequate tax base to finance these costs; and
WHEREAS, a representative of EPIII Limited, a Minnesota limited
partnership to be formed by Mitchell A. Anderson, Wallace Hustad, and Kenneth E.
Nelson (the "Developer"), has advised this City Council that it desires to acquire
land and construct a hotel facility (hereinafter referred to as the "Project"). The
Project will be located at the southwest corner of 1-494 and Flying Cloud Drive at
approximately 7720 to 7780 Flying Cloud Drive in the City. The proposed project
will be owned by the Developer for use in their business; and
WHEREAS, the existence of the Project in the City will contribute to more
intensive development and use of land to increase the tax base of the City and
overlapping taxing authorities and maintain and provide for an increase in
opportunities for employment for residents of the City, including economically
disadvantaged or unemployed individuals; and
/AM
WHEREAS, the City has been advised that conventional, commercial
financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available at such costs of
borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be
significantly reduced, and, therefore, the City finds that but for the aid of
municipal financing, and its resulting lower borrowing cost, the Project would not
be uncleraken; and
WHEREAS, this Council has been advised by a representative of the
Developer that on the basis of information submitted to them and their discussions
with representatives of area financial institutions and potential buyers of tax-
exempt bonds, industrial development revenue bonds of the City could be issued
and sold upon favorable rates and terms to finance the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, to
issue its revenue bonds to finance the cost, in whole or in part, of the acquisition,
construction, reconstruction, improvement or extension of capital projects
consisting of properties used and useful in connettion with a revenue producing
enterprise, such as that of the Developer, and the issuance of such bonds by the
City would be a substantial inducement to the Developer to construct its facility in
the City; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to pay directly or through the City any
and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the
Project is approved by the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic
Development; whether or not the Project is carried to completion; and whether or
not the bonds or operative instruments are executed; and
WHEREAS, on the basis of information given the City to date, it appears
that it would be in the hest interest of the City to issue its industrial development
revenue bonds under the provisions of Chapter 474 to finance the Project of the
Developer in an amount presently estimated not to exceed $4,500,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and the
issuance of the revenue bonds for such purpose and in such amount is preliminarily
approved, subject to approval of the Project by the Minnesota Department of
Energy and Economic Development and to the mutual agreement of this body, the
Developer and the initial purchaser of the bonds as to the details of the bonds and
provisions for their payment. In all events, it is understood, however, that the
bonds of the City shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance legal or
equitable upon any property of the City except the -Project, and the bonds, when,
as, and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bonds, including interest
thereon, are payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and
property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the
City.
2. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision
7a, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal
for the Project to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development
for approval of the Project. The Mayor and other officers, employees and agents
of the City are hereby authoriAed to provide the Minnesota Department of Energy
and Economic Development with any preliminary information needed for this
-2-
csu
purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the
preparation of such documents ins may be appropriate to the Project, if it is
approved by the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development.
3. The law firm of Holmes & Craven, Chartered, is authorized to act as
Bond Counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents
relating to the Project and bonds issued in connection therewith. The Mayor, City
Attorney, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby
authorized to assist Bond Counsel in the preparation of such documents.
4. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision
11, the City Manager and other officers, employees and agents of the City are
hereby authorized and directed to encourage the Developer to provide employment
opportunities to economically disadvantaged or unemployed individuals. Such
individuals may be identified by such mechanisms as are available to the City,
including a first source agreement in which the Developer agrees to use a
designated State employment office as a first source for employment recruitment,
referral, and placement.
5. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a
firm commitment that the City will issue the bonds as requested by the Developer.
The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and
accordingly not to issue the bonds, or issue the bonds in an amount less than the
amount referred to in the recitals hereof, should the City at any time prior to
issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interests of the City not to issue
the bonds, or to issue the bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in
the recitals hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach
agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the
transaction. Additionally, the City is an entitlement issuer within the meaning of
1984 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 582 (the "Act"); this resolution does not and shall
not be deemed to constitute an agreement on the part of the City to allocate a
portion of its entitlement allocation under the Act to the Project, and this
resolution and the preliminary approval of the City set forth herein are contingent
upon either an allocation of such entitlement allocation by the City to the Project
or receipt by the City of an additional allocation of bonding authority from the
Commissioner of the Department of Energy and Economic Development with
respect to the Project in an amount equal to or greater than the principal amount
of the bonds prior to issuance and sale of the bonds.
6. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the
condition that by December 31, 1985 the City and the applicant shall have agreed
to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the revenue agreement or other
similar instrument, the bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating
to the bonds rind their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take
place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are
not sold within such time, this Resolution shall expire and be of no further effect.
-3-
JUN .,1985
19939 VOID OUT CHECK
20464 MINNESOTA GAS CO
20465 MICHAEL EVANS
20466 WARREN ANDERSON
20467 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO
20468 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
20469 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF P/S
20470 CO;.IMISSIONER OF REVENUE
20471 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO
20472 PETTY CASH
20473 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
20474 TWIN CITY WINE CO
20475 EAGLE WINE CO
20476 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
20477 QUALITY WINE CO
20478 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
20479 NORTHWEST BANK HOPKINS
20480 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
20481 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
20482 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
20483 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
20484 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO
20485 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO
21 i CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
20407 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK
20488 PERA
20489 PE RA
20490 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE
20491 DANA GIBBS
20492 CHARLES W PROUD JR
20493 LUKE ABBOTT
20494 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
20495 ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNIC
20496 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
20497 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
20498 MINNESOTA GAS CO
20499 SUZIE NIESEN
20500 U S POSTMASTER
20501 TAMMY JOHNSON
20502 LAURA ESMOND
20503 MICHAEL PARSONS
20504 MELISSA KID
20505 TOM BARBEAU
20506 KEVIN DELIE
20507 CONNIE LARSON
20508 MINNESOTA GAS CO
09 MINNESOTA GREEN INDUSTRIES EXPO
10 NORTHERN STAIES POWER CO
20511 DOUGLAS El WAND ANDREWS
20512 CURTIS MANLEY BERCQUIST
20513- LANCE MICHAEL CRACC
20514 SPENCER LEE CONRAD
20515 GENE EDWARD DAHLKE
20516 RICHARD RA‘MOND DEATON
SERVICE
REFUND - SPORTS CAMP
10 LARGE CANN1STERS CHEMSHIELD
KEYS - POLICE DEPT
SERVICE
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
APRIL FUEL TAX
WINE
PETTY CASH
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
PAYROLL 5-17-85
ADS-LIQUOR STORES
PACKET DELIVERY
REFUND-FAMILY SWIMMING/FITNESS MEMBERSHIP
REFUND-ICE SHOW
APRIL SALES TAX
-CONFERENCE-MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS/CITY -
MANAGER
CONFERENCE-MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBER/MANAGER
SERVICE
SERVICE
SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING/FITNESS MEMBERSHIP
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES
SERVICE
CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
3.50-
3522.82
40.00
100.00
17.00
13229.03
10.75
210.12
226.84
60.81
5101.98
289.41
287.83
4758.31
1253.03
2159.64
880.00
19281.25
10352.70
14936.72
10.00
120.00
5313.00
1280.00
250.00
63.00
16388.68
187.00
117.00
54.00
12.00
13409.51
96.00
487.00
12978.32
1451.16
410.00
745.00
11.25
1.50
13.60
10.00
12.00
10.00
5.50
220.70
42.50
5544.2:
476.00
788.60
338.00
1332Aw
544.00
762.00
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIKMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
FIREMAN CALLS
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CLNSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
218.00
574.00
1140.00
482.00
904.00
718.00
1300.00
500.00
1080.00
316.00
616.00
440.00
352.00
1672.00
672.00
314.00
702.00
542.00
698.00
686.00
316.00
992.010
314.00
1100.00
460.00
1040.00
858.00
1370.00
810.00
520.00
744.00
1434.00
1184.00
946.00
1010.00
422.00
830.00
622.00
596.00
334.00
528.00
948.00
1386.68
606.00
594.00
288.05
498.00
498.00
322.00
414.4)
440.50
445.01
319.30
783.10
20517 ROBERT DANIEL DOLE
20518 FRANKLIN PAUL ELLERING
20519 CHARLES ANTHONY FERN
20520 WALTER SMALLWOOD FIELDS
Z' 'I CHARLES ARTHUR GOBLE
2E-L2 ROBERT RICHARD GRANT
20523 JOHN KENNETH HACKING
20524 FREDRICK KARL HAFFNER
20525 JOHN THOMAS HOBBS
20526 GENE AUSTIN JACOBSON
20527 WALTER CHARLES JAMES
20528 DUANE LEWIS JOHNSON
20529 MICHAEL WAYNE JOHNSON
20530 RONALD OLE JOHNSON
20531 MARVIN ALLEN LAHTI
20532 MAILAND EARL LANE
20533 BRADLEY EARL LARSON
20534 JAMES WILLIAM LINDGREN
20535 ROBERT PAUL LISTIAK
20536 LOWELL DENNIS LUND
20537 REGAN LAWRENCE MASSEE
20538 PHILIP GEORGE MATHIOWETZ
20539 BRIAN GILL MCGRAW
20540 GARY LEE MEYER
20541 RAYMOND IRWIN MITCHELL
20542 THOMAS HAMILTON MONTGOMERY
20543 JOHN EDWARD PAFKO
20544 DOUGLAS LEE PLEHAL
20545 JOHN DAVID RIEGERT
: 6 STANLEY ADOLPH RIEGERT
20D47 JOHN DAVID ROCHFORD
20548 MICHAEL JOHN ROGERS
20549 NORBERT HENRY ROGERS
20550 TIMOTHY ALLEN SATHER
20551 CHARLES CLARENCE SCHAITBERGER
20552 HARVEY HERMAN SCHMIDT
20553 GERALD MATHEW SCHWANKL
20554 JOHN JOSEPH SKRANKA
20555 GENE RAYMOND SPANDE
20556 VERNON THOMAS STEPPE
20557 JEFFREY DALE STONEBURG
20558 BURTON LEE SUTTON
20559 MARC LEWIS THIELMAN
20560 JAY CHRISTOPHER WHITING
20561 THOMAS DEFOREST WILSON
20562 DUANE JAMES CABLE
20563 DAVID ONEN KRUEGER
20564 JAMES LEE MATSON
20565 CURTIS REED OBLRLANDER
20566 CAROLYN A BAILEY
20567 JUDITH E BAKER
20568 RAGNHILD BLACK
20569 DIANA L BLAGDON r c70 GRETCHEN R BURCKHARDT
3789920
1,*7
20571 DOROTHY A CABA
20572 BMW G CAIL
20573 GLENDA C CLARK
201" LEON D DOMINICK
CAROLYN A DOWNEY
20576 ANNE R HAWKINS
20577 SHEILA H HELLER
20578 JULIANA C HUGHES
20579 MARSHA IWAN
20580 MARIETTA A JACOBY
20581 KATHARIEN A JONES
20582 EILEEN M KLEVANN
20583 ROXANNE R KLOSKOWSKI
20584 MICHAEL T LAHEY
20585 JOANNE M LANO
20586 NANCY C LITTLE
20537 JOAN H MCKEE
20588 WILLIAM P MCLAIN
20589 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
20590 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO
20591 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
20592 TWIN CITY WINE CO
20593 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
20594 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
20595 QUALITY WINE CO
20596 PRIOR WINE CO
20597 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
20598 WILLIAM D MCNEIL
21 ALDEN J MOOERS
ALFRED L NELSON
20601 VIRGINIA A NELSON
20602 KENNETH M POTTER
20603 KREN L PREW
20604 DALE A REOPATH
20605 EDWIN C STOESSEL
20606 KATRINA E TRENT
20607 RUTH L TRAASETH
20608 A COMMERCIAL DOOR COMPANY
20609 A & 11 WELDING & MFG CO
20610 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
20611 ALEXANDER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
20612 ALL INDUSTRY SUPPLIES
20613 ALL STEEL SOCCER GOALS
20614 AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
20615 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC
20616 EARL F ANDERSEN A ASSOC INC
20617 ASSOCIATED ASPHALT INC
20618 ASSOCIATED LITHOGRAPHERS INC
20619 ASTLEFORD ININL INC
20620 AT A T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
20621 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
20622 AT & T INFORMTION SYSTEMS
20A23 AVR INC
2 4 BARCO SEARING CO
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERV10E-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE - CENSUS TAKER
SERVICE-CENSUS TAKER
P/S GARAGE DOOR REPAIR
TARGET/BRACKET FOR RADIO PRINTER-P/S DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECHARGEABLE BATTERY-POLICE DEPT
MAGNET-FIRE DEPT
PORTABLE SOCCER GOALS-PARK MAINTENANCE
LAB SUPPL1ES-WATER DEPT
FILMS-WATER DEPT
TOT LOT STRUCTURE-STARING LAKE PARK
BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT
PRINT SUMMER ED BOOKS
CORE-FIRE DEPT
PHONE SYSTEM-WATER DEPT
SERVICE
SERVICE
CONCRETE-STREET DEPT
EQUIPMENT PARTS-COMMUNITY CENTER
380.14
1098.32
478.77
651.82
310.59
553.59
459.49
281.46
428.41
137.58
667.49
303.31
52.45
313.23
154.96
295.31
344.03
536.80
1168.64
342.97
247.39
54.27
3486.05
3440.24
1100.17
472.08
2141.13
309.11
580.83
512.89
301.55
1076.87
405.15
105.14
423.92
344.26
272.76
248.15
196.30
735.86
185.32
81.32
1025.00
300.76
725.30
5000.00
3793.10
3722.33
60.50
7445.50
21.69
947.19
96.19
27.00
4384468
LAM
20625 B 8 W INC
5 BLACK & VEATCH
2tio27 BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO
20628 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO
20629 LEE BRANDT
20630 bRAUN ERG TESTING INC
20631 ANDREA BROSCH
20632 BSN CORP
20633 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC
20534 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY
20635 CADDYLAK SYSTEMS INC
20636 BILL CAMUEL
20637 CARDOX CORP
20638 CARLSON S CARLSON ASSOC
20639 C & N W TRANSP CO
20640 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC
20641 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
20642 JEFF CONRAD
20643 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC
20644 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
20645 CPT CORP
20646 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC
2r'1 7 CUSTOM SURFACING CO
2 .8 CUTLER MAGNER CO
20649 DALCO
20650 CRAIG W DAWSON
20651 DEPARTMENT OF PROP TAXATION
20652 DORHOLT INC
20653 DUSTCOATING INC
20654 CHRIS ENGER
20655 EPA AUDIO VISUAL
20656 DOUG EPSTEIN
20657 CHARLES FAUST
20658 FITNESS STORE
20659 FOX MCCUE & MURPHY
20660 GALLERY SERVICE
20661 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
20662 GLIDDEN PAINT
20663 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTERS
20664 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
20665 GREENKEEPER INC
20666 MACH CO
20667 JACK HACKING
20668 HALLOCK COMPANY INC
20669 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO
20670 HEDBERG & SONS CO
'I HENNEPIN COUNTY
-SERVICE-TECHNOLOGY DRIVE/EDEN ROAD/
22353.39
-S1NGLETREE LANE/ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/
-VALLEY VIEW ROAD/MITCHELL TO CTY RD 4/
PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
SEVICE-WATER PLANT EXPANSION 22319.63
REPAIR LOCK - LATER DEPT 9.50
BELT-COMMUNITY CENTER 39.02
HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 242.00
SERVICE-FRANLO PARK 273.95
RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 91.00
GOLF CAGE NETS-PARKS DEPT 259.42
-BOOKCASE-COMMUNITY SERVICES/DESK & 734.71
RETURN-PLANNING DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 185.50
BOOKS-WAIIR DEPT 100.74
REFUND-HOCKEY GAME 10.00
CARBON DIOXIDE-LATER DEPT 1268.12
CONSULTING-POLICE DEPT 420.00
LEASE AGREEMENT-ENG DEPT 60.00
BRAKE CHAMBER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 214.99
-TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AT 169 & PRAIRIE 6994.83
CENTER DRIVE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 60.00
FIRE BOOTS 204.00
VELLUM/FLAGGING TAPE 18.90
DISK CART/RIBBON-POLICE DEPT 349.00
-EQUIPMENT FOR FIRE TRUCK $2449.00 MODIFY 6550.20
FIRE ENGINES
REFUND PLAN DEPOSIT 10.00
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 4653.86
PIPE/CLEANING SUPPLIES-STREET MAINT 114.01
MILEAGE 45.00
VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATION 27.34
OFFICE SUPPLIES 679.00
OIL-DUST CONTROL 704.00
MAY EXPENSES 165.00
SLIDE TRAY-WATER DEPT 51.93
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 104.00
TAPES FOR ICE SHOW 125.00
EXERCISE EQUIPMENT-POLICE DEPT 434.00
AUDIT SERVICE 1308.50
-FRAME WEIGHT & FITNESS EXERCISE CHARTS 230.22
POLICE DEPT
RADIO REPAIR & PARTS 586.13
PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 217.50
10 TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 918.26
CONFERENCE-MANAGER & ASSISTANT MANAGER 252.00
REPAIR LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM 60.95.
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 8.00
EXPENSES 31.07
EQUIPMENT REPAIR-WATER DEPT 27.50
SAW/ASPHALT CulTER-STREET DEPT 766.80
PARKING LOT CURB-P/S BLDG 180.00
APRIL 85 BOARD OF PRISONERS 4802.00
7926097
/1'0
20672 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
20673 HOPKINS PLUMBING & HEATING CO
20674 MATHEW J HOD/OP
nr ,5 KURT OYSTER
A
ISM
20677 GARY ISAACS
20678 PETER W JACKSON
20679 JAK OFFICE PRODUCTS CO
20680 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
20681 JOSTENS
20682 CARL JULLIE
20683 DANIEL J KASID
20684 KAY PARK-REC CORP
20685 JEROME R KING
20686 HEIDI KISPERT
20687 MICHAEL F KISSIN
20688 KLEVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING
20689 ROGER KOLAND
20690 KROY INC
20691 GUST LAGERQUIST & SONS INC
20692 LAKE STATE EQUIPMENT CO
20693 LAKESIDE FUSEE CORP
20694 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
20695 BOB LANZI
20696 J 11 LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY
20697 LOGIS
20698 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR
26699 LUMBERJACK TREE SERVICE
20" 1 LYMAN LUMBER CO
MACDONALD AND MACK PARTNERSHIP
20702 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
20703 RANDY MASON
20704 MASY CORPORATION
20705 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
20706 MCI CELLCOM
20707 METHODIST HOSPITAL
20708 METROPOLITAN FIRE EQUIP CO
20709 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM
20710 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
20711 MAC
20712 MPLS STAR A TRIBUNE CO
20713 MINNESOTA DAILY
20714 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
20715 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
20716 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE INC
20717 MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES
20718 MODERN OFFICE
20719 Mil DISTRIBUTING CO
20720 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC
20721 JEFF NELSON
20722 NORTHLRN ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION INC
20723 NORTHERN HYPRAULICS INC
20724 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
VOID OUT CHECK
APRIL 85 BOOKING FEE
,SERVICE-AMSDEfl WAY
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SPELL CHECK FOR 2 IBM TYPEWRITERS-P/S
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
OFFICE FURNITURE-POLICE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
EMBLEM-ANIMAL CONTROL
EXPENSES
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
2 PEDAL BOATS-ROUND LAKE PARK
REFUND PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT-BLDG DEPT
SERVICE-COMMUNITY SERVICES
GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
REPAIR BASEMENT AIR CORD/CITY HALL
REPAIR P/S GARAGE
KROY TAPE-POLICE DEPT
REPAIR ELEVATOR-COMMUNITY CENTER
RINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FUSES-FIRE DEPT
MARCH 85 SERVICE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
BROKEN LAMP BASE REMOVER-STREET DEPT
APRIL 1985 SERVICE
PINS/BEARINGS-PARKS MAINTENANCE
TREES-FORESTRY DEPT
LUMBER-BLDG DEPT
SERVICE-CUMMINS RESTORATION
4 NOZZLES-SEWER DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE-POLICE DEPT
EXPENSES
SERVICE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1ST AID SUPPLIES-P/S DEPT
FIRE EXTENQUISHERS-FIRE DEPT
APRIL 85 SAC CHARGES
BLACKTOP-STREET DEPT
LEASE BALLFIELDS & RECYCLE CENTER
EMPLOYMENT AD - FINANCE DEPT
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY SERVICES
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMM SERVICES/COMM CENTER
ADS
TREES-FORESTRY DEPT
SHARE OF MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES
MAIL CART-COMMUNITY CENTER
BOLTS & NUTS/IDLER PULLEY/LIFT
FIRE PREVENTION MATERIAL-FIRE DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SEALCOAT P/S PARKING LOT
BOAT TRAILER JACK-FIRE DEPT
SERVICE
654.71
54.00
104.00
60.00
270.00
182.00
150.00
189.54
19.17
60.00
81.60
195.00
2115.00
10.00
72.00
216.00
127.15
60.00
54.37
119.00
0.58
878.58
11347.37
130.00
5.96
4349.19
79.20
555.00
69.39
1517.50
515.36
90.00
1180.00
62.90
86.80
1063.14
89.85
53014.50
3429.12
556.80
110.00
35.91
166.65
191.28
3384.70
100.00
279.95
136.75
549.01
234.00
1850.00
39.95
9.67
0.00
9090265
20726 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMM SYSTEMS
20727 NORTMEST PRINTING
2P'9 11 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO
a. .9 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO
20730 STEVE OLSTAD
20731 DON ITNDLING
20732 HARRY A ORTLOFF
20733 MIKE PAUL ELECTRIC INC
20734 PATRICK PEREZ
20735 WILLIE PEREZ
20736 POWER MFG CO INC
20737 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT
20738 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC
20739 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
20740 PREFERRED PAVING
20741 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
20742 R & R SPECIALTIES INC
20743 RECREONICS CORP
20744 REED'S SALES & SERVICE
20745 JAMES F RHODY
20746 ROAD RESCUE INC
20747 ROBERT RYAN
20748 TONI D SCHMIDT
20749 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
r 50 STEVEN R SINELL
W GORDON SMITH CO
20752 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
20753 SNAP PRINT-WEST
20754 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC
20755 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
20756 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
20757 SPECIALTY SCREENING
20758 STATE TREASURER
20759 STATE TREASURER
20760 DON STREICHER GUNS
20761 DAVID STUTELBERG
20762 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
20763 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
20764 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC
20765 TERRY SALES
20766 TESSMAN SEED A CHEMICAL COMPANY
20767 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC
20768 TK ASSOCIATES
20769 TRIARCO ARTS A CRAFTS
20770 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
20771 UNIBILT INC
2 0 772 UN! 100 RENTAL SERVICES
73 UNIVERSITY OF MIRNLsOTA
2oi74 VAN PINES INC
REPAIR TAPE RECORDER-POLICE DEPT
PRINTING-ERG DEPT
SERVICE
CEMENT-STREET DEPT
MILEAGE
2 WAY RADIO & AMPLIFIER-POLICE DEPT
HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
ELECTRICAL SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD -
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
RIBBONS-COMM CENTER & COMMUNITY SERVICES
AIR BRAKE FITTINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
3" WATER METERS
-INSTALL RECEPTACLES/CIRCUITS/PILOT LIGHT
20 FOOT ELECTRIC POLE-P/S BUILDING
SERVICE-FRANLO RD & EDEN VALLEY PARKS
-OIL/VACUUM UNIT FOR JOHN TRACTOR &MOWER
POLICE DEPT
-SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES/SERVICE ZAMBONI
ENGINE-CORRUNITY CENTER
INFLATABLE OCTOPUS-RECREATION DEPT
LAWN MOWER BLADES
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
911 LICENSE PLATES HOLDERS
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
BRUSH-WATER DEPT
MAY EXPENSES
FUEL OIL FOR ELECTRIC GENERATOR P/S BLDG
WRENCH/SOCKET
PRINTING-POLICE & COMMUNITY SERVICES
DYE FOR CLEANING TOWELS/
LEGAL ADS
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-CAR & FIRE TRUCK EMBLEMS/PLAQUES-FIRE
DEPT
FEE-WATER DEPT
FEES-WATER DEPT
-SHOTGUN CASES/GUN HOLDER/BRUSHES FOR
GUN CLEANING-POLICE DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
CABLE/GRILL
LEAD/HEAD LAMP
PUMP TANK-RESEARCH ROAD
POLICE DEPT POLICY MANUALS
WEED SPRAY & SPRAYER-PARK MAINTENANCE
CLEANING KIT-FORESTRY DEPT
SERVICE-RECYCLING SURVEY
BOARD-COMMUNITY SERVICES
OXYGEN & ACETYLENE CYLINDER
REFUND BLDG DEPOSIT
UNIFORM RENTALS-CITY EMPLOYEES
EYE TEST FOR POLICE DOG
TREES-FORESTRY DEPT
44.90
518.65
17.21
81.77
6.33
815.00
348.00
3861.21
390.00
78.00
424.00
5.88
351.55
6727.00
47017.24
1190.36
188.94
2004.50
6.82
104.00
182.43
45.00
156.00
144.25
170.00
472.2m
56.30
70.1?
10.22
406.5 ,1
97.50
679.40
15.00
15.00
212.70
208.00
105.60
60.5'
50.00
837.00
1453.21
7.2 1 .
2356.0(
103.50
34.7
300.00
10.0.
206.21,
7302743
20775 VICTORIA REPAIR & MFG
20776 VIDEOTRONIX INC
2r 7 JIM WALTER PAPERS
2L-8 WATER PRODUCTS CO
20779 WESCO
20780 WESTERN CHEMICAL CO
20781 WHOLESALE LIGHTING INC
20782 ADAM WIETHOFF
20783 JOE WIETHOFF
20784 CHET WYATT
20785 XEROX CORP
20786 ZIEBART AUTO TRUCK RUSTPROOFING
20787 BACHMANS
20788 MIKE BURGETT
20789 NDEO A
20790 PROFFESSIONAL COMPUTING
20791 ICMA
20792 MARK'S EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO
20793 JASON-NORTHCO PROPERTIES
20794 ROBERT HENDRICKSON
20795 ROBERT HENDRICKSON
12219967
.RENT PONTOON TRAILER-PARK MAINTENANCE
REPAIR VIDEO UNIT-POLICE DEPT
XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL
-MAGNETIC LOCATOR-FORESTRY DEPT/GASKET/
-GENERATOR/SWIVEL/EIGHT I" METERS $984.00/
-FOUR 1 1/2" METERS $1180.00/ONE 2"
METER $418.00
LIGHT BULBS-COMMUNITY CENTER
CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT
LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
HORSESHOE STAKES-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE
RUSTPROOF NEW TRUCK-PARK MAINTENANCE
FLOWERS - CITY HALL
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT
SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE
DUES-MANAGER
GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
JUNE RENT-LIQUOR STORE
LAND-RILEY LAKE PARK
LAND-RILEY LAKE PARK
10.00
38.0e
672.50
4879.40,
127.93
4681.80
99.36
15.00
130.00
80.00
1795.45
150.00
105.95
182.00
110.00
29.97
171.30
33.71
3887.22
72060.31
32939.69
$592332.27
June 4, 1985
Cash Disbursements by Fund number
Fund,/
Description • Amount
10 General
11 Certificate of Indebt
15 Liquor Store-Prairie Village Mall
17 Liquor Store-Preserve
31 Park Acquistion & Development
33 Utility Bond Fund
36 P/S & P/W Bond Fund
51 Improvement Const Fund
57 Road Improvement Const Fund
73 • Water Fund
77 Sewer Fund
81 Trust & Escrow Fund
87 CDBGFund
90 Tax Increment Fund
Total
$239996.46
2883.00
25572.67
16335.42
160886.19
22319.63
2472.90
19505.18
180.30
36384.53
54118.31
361.55
1517.50
9798.63
$592332.27
/ALI
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #85-126
.RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RESEARCH FARM 2ND ADDITION
FOR NORTHRUP KING
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Research Farm 2nd Addition, for Northrup King, dated
April 8, 1985, consisting of approximately 177 acres into six outlots, a copy of
which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions
of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of June, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City -Clerk
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 10, 1985
Research Farm Second Addition
West of Highway #169 at Anderson Lakes Parkway
Northrup King
Preliminary Plat of approximately 180 acres into six outlots, and
road right-of-way.
TO:
FROM:
YIPTOGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
In March of 1985, the City Council
approved a request by Northrup King
for an amendment to the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan from Low
Density Residential, High Density
Residential and Sports Complex to
Medium Density Residential, High
Density Residential, Office, and
Commercial uses for the site.
The proponent is now requesting a
preliminary plat of approximately
1110f acres into six outlots and road
right-of-way for sale of the
property.
217
EA 25)
tr: e
_ PROPOSED SITE
_ fr
_
LC OA T IVi14:413
Research ram Second Addition 2 May 10, 1985
Preliminary Plat
The following table illustrates the acrea
g
e
o
f
e
a
c
h
o
u
t
l
o
t
a
n
d
t
o
t
a
l
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
:
Outlet
A
Road R.O.W.
Size (In acres)
. 50.65
27.57 .
1.03
9.38
4.70
76.87
10+
1ilb.2 acres
Outlet sizes and locations are the result
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
road alignments for the property. (See
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
A
&
8
)
T
h
e
r
o
a
d
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
between Outlots 0 and E is to be used for
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
R
o
a
d
v
i
a
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
s
Parkway once its access to Highway #169-21
2
i
s
c
l
o
s
e
d
.
T
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
e
part of a permanent road, which will exten
d
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
f
u
t
u
r
e
platting proposals. Outlot C and the di
v
i
s
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
O
u
t
l
o
t
s
B
a
n
d
D
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
where the realignnt of Research Road wil
l
t
a
k
e
p
l
a
c
e
,
a
t
w
h
i
c
h
t
i
m
e
,
a
n
d
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
present Research Road will be vacated.
Since the site will remain zoned rural,
n
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
r
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
will take place until each specific site
h
a
s
h
a
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
W
i
t
h
t
h
i
s
in mind, proper utility, drainage, and sce
n
i
c
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
c
a
n
b
e
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
with future platting proposals.
STAFF REC(MENDATIONS
Staff would approve the preliminary plat of approximately 180 acres into six outlets
and road right-of-way subject to the follo
w
i
n
g
:
1. No development or grading of the proper
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
t
a
k
e
p
l
a
c
e
u
n
t
i
l
e
a
c
h
specific site has had City Council approva
l
.
2. Pay the appropriate Cash Park lee prior to
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
.
cfl
COMPREHENSIVE MID ‘_L LAN AMENDMENT
177 ACRE RESEARCH FARM
NORTHRUP KING CO
RESEARCH FARM
-EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
CA.1: LCI D
/027 7, _ _ _ • '• ""'" !;:!!•:
4-1
C
Ei
ai .
-
CUTLOT a
(r.:71..")I A •
r r' A
,t ;VI
....
'01 ,n."'":".."'it ',t,
'" 4 '....'",/,;;•:• , ll'ir 9';',.;•.90 -1,..,
'•'-'2,.,I IKEs.:.i,s, ;.,.• ' 1
‘,...._______—. ) , , r : ,,--
.
$5 F..."•:'
,,....•,.. --
.,
n• . -''''c %
iz.....ft.;s.,..."."...:0 :::.;,_....-• ' .... IC 7'..i.; .'t : •
..
4,•,„‘ OUTICT -
&
.li
A .t. •
:1' P• Vs te.: n•n•n
2 •n••
••.'
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
•THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services
DATE: May May 16, 1985
SUBJECT: Research Farm Addition
On December 17, 1934, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
reviewed the "park elements" of the Northrup King Proposal. At that time, the
proponent did not have a final plan for review by the Commission, but simply
requested the Commission to make a recommendation regarding two park issues:
1. The Commission was requested to make a recommendation regarding the Guide Plan
designation of the sports complex located just north of the Vo-Tech.
2. The Commission was requested to make a recommendation regarding how the City
would acquire the creek valley, and what portion of the creek valley should be
.acquired by deed and what portion should be preserved through a scenic easement.
t that meeting, the following action was taken:
MOTION: The motion was made by Kingrey to recommend that the sports complex be
removed from the Guide Plan since more appropriate areas are available for it.
Schwartz seconded the motion and it carried 5-0.
MOTION: Baker moved to accept the staff recommendation and recommend that the
west half of the creek corridor be dedicated and a scenic easement be required
east of the creek. Kingrey seconded the motion and it passed 5-0.
At the December 17 meeting, staff indicated that when a final plan request was
developed and presented to the Planning Commission staff would provide that plan to
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission for review.
On March 18, 1935, the parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed
the request for a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to this 180 acre site from low
density residential, high density residential and a sports complex to office,
commercial, industiral, medium and high density residential. The Commission
concurred with the Planning Commission and recommended a Guide Plan change to a
combination of medium density residential, high density residenitial, commercial and
office. That plan also included dedication of 10 acres on the west side of the
creek for City park and a commitment of approximately 5 acres on the east side of
the creek to a scenic easement.
The request before the Commission on May 20 is for approval of a preliminary plat of
approximately 180 acres into six outlots and road right-of-way for sale of the
property.
(j()
The platting is being done at this time in order to dedicate the right-of-ways for
Anderson Lakes Parkway and the realignment of Research Road. Staff is not
requesting the dedication of the park at this platting, but will be discussing the
purchase of the park corridor with the owner or owners of Outlots A and B at the
time of rezoning requests.
tiLund
go(
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-130
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
RESEARCH FARM 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Research Farm 2nd Addition has been submitted in a manner
required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the
regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and
ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Research Farm 2nd Addition is
approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated May 28, 1985.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified
copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the
above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 4, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
john D. Frane, Clerk
I ;(19-
HISTORY:
VARIANCES:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
May 28, 1985
RESEARCH FARM 2ND ADDITION
The property owner, Northrup King has requested City Council
approval of the final plat of Research Farm 2nd Addition, a
replat of Research Farm Addition, located in the North 1/2 of
Section 22. The proposed plat will divide the site of
approximately 180 acres into 6 outlots and road right-of-way
dedication, including Anderson Lakes Parkway. The outlots
will be replatted at later dates in conformance with City
zoning and platting procedures. The owner has requested this
plat approval to aid in the sale of the property.
Resolution 85-53, amending the Comprehensive Guide Plan, was
approved by the City Council on February 5, 1985.
The preliminary plat is scheduled for City Council review on
June 4, 1985 (Resolution 85-126).
Variances have not been requested.
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PROPOSAL:
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Right-of-way dedication for Anderson Lakes Parkway is
accomplished through this plat. All necessary improvements to
this roadway are being installed under I.C. 52-035. Hybrid
Lane (Research Road connection) will also be temporarily
surfaced under this project. Utilities necessary to serve
property adjacent to Hybrid Lane are not included and must be
installed concurrent with future development (refer to
bonding).
Additional right-of-way will be necessary along TH 169/212.
However, the exact amount as well as how much of the area
would be by dedication and how much by purchase has not been
discussed at this point. In general terms, the State thinks
they will need an additional 75-80 feet. A reasonable amount
of dedication would probably be 20 feet. Since the outlots
will require additional platting with development, staff
/ 209
recommends that the issue be deferred until that time. The
current and future owners should note that some additional
dedication will be required at that time and that coordination
with MnDOT will be necessary. 4
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication requirements will be addressed when division
of the outlots occur.
BONDING:
The plat shows the property being platted into only outlots at
this time. Staff position is that it is necessary to replat
the outlots into lots and blocks prior to (or concurrent with)
development. Although right-of-way is shown on this plat,
Staff recommends that no bonding he secured for the road
improvements at this time. The requirement will be imposed at
the next platting stage.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Research Farm 2nd
Addition subject to the requirements of this report and the
following:
1. City Council approval of Resolution 85-126.
2. Defer engineering fees until future platting.
3. Defer additional right-of-way dedications until future
platting.
4. Defer street light fees until future platting.
5. Defer sign fees until future development.
6. Subject to other applicable requirements of the City
Code.
7. Subject to the special assessments as proposed to the
project from the construction of Anderson Lakes
Parkway.
DL 0:g
cc: Dick Putnam, Tandem Corp.
lgoLi
n 61 1 296 -2840
STATE OF MINNESOTA
WATER RESOURCES BOARD
500 Lafayette Road
First Floor
St. Paul, Minnesota
55146
May 13, 1985
Chairman,
Hennepin
County Board of Commissioners
County Auditor,
'Hennepin
County
Concerning: Appointment of Managers to the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District
The Water Resources Board wishes to remind you that the term of
Dr. Eugene Davis expires on September 29, 1985 .
The new appointment or reappointment should be made for a term to expire on
September 29. 1988
According to Minnesota Statutes Section 112.42, a record of all
watershed district manager appointments shall be filed with the county auditor,
the secretary of the watershed district board of managers, and the office of
the Water Resources Board. No person shall be appointed who is not a voting
resident of the watershed district and none shall be a public officer of the
county, state, or federal government, provided that a soil and water conservation
district supervisor may be appointed as a manager.
Karen Schultz
Office Secretary
CC- Watershed District Secretary
and Attorney
MAY 23, 1985
Hennepin County Commissioners
Government Center
300 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Attention: Ms. Kay Mitchel, secretary
Dear Commission:
I would like to express my interest in being re-appointed as a Manager in
the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. My term expires in September of
1985. I have served one full term as a manager.
During my term I have served as treasurer to the district having the charge
of collecting, investing and dispersing the revenues. I have also worked
very hard in developing "money management" plans to keep the activities of
the district in a prudent fiscal position.
I will look forward to interviewing with you when these sessions are scheduled.
Sincerely your,
4:C1
Dr. Eugene 'Davis
6724 Kings 56n Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
ED/ss
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie C 1
Public Safety Department's StaffMg Request
May 30, 1985
MEMORANDUM
As per the attached memo of May 28th, Mr. Hacking has requested the addition of one Public
Safety Officer to be hired in June of 1985. I requested Mr. Hacking to prepare the
supporting data which is attached to his request, plus the Table of Organization for the
Department which shows how the various personnel are utilized (the Organization Table is
included in your "FYI" packet this week).
When preparing the 1985 City Budget in August of last year we projected that building and
development activities would be equal or slightly less than the 1984 rate. However,
through April of this year we are almost 50% ahead of the 1984 total for the same period
in terms of total permits issued for housing units. Also our fees collected for building
permits are $44,000 ahead of last year. I believe that Building Department activity is a
good indicator of the demand for services in several of our City departments, including
Public Safety.
Please note that I have also included in the packet a memo dated September 11, 1984
regarding our projections of future City staff needs. At that time I indicated that the
appropriate ratio of Police Officers to 1,000 population for Eden Prairie was 1.15 and I
estimated that in 1985 our population would be 22,500. Based upon the recently certified
population of 24,000 at this time, the resulting number would be 27.6 Officers. The
proposed addition of one Officer would bring out total to 27 sworn officers and a ratio of
1.125.
I do concur with Mr. Hacking's request for an additional Public Safety Officer. This will
not negatively affect the 1985 City Budget as explained in Mr. Hacking's memo, but of
course it will have full impact on the 1986 Budget ($32,500). The additional Officer will
place our ratio of Officers to 1,000 population at 1.125, which is still well in line with
neighboring suburban communities.
sincerely believe that the vast majority of citizens and business people in Eden Prairie
have a very high regard for the prompt, efficient and courteous service of our Public
Safety Officers. If this is to continue we must provide enough Officers so that our staff
is still faced with a challening workload yet not oppressive and frustrating to the point
where morale and performance will suffer. Accordingly, I believe that the addition of one
Public Safety Officer at this time is appropriate.
CJJ:jp
Attachment
ISO
May 28, 1985
TO: CARL JULL1E
FROM: JACK HACKING
SUBJECT:
STAFFING REQUEST
In our 1985 budget, we requested three (3) police officers and one (1) community
service officer. We received approval to hire two (2) police officers and one
(I) community service officer.
On January 2nd, we filled one of the police officer positions by hiring Tracy
Luke.
On May 13th, we filled the second police officer position by hiring Rob
Reynolds. Because of the testing procedure that we are required to complete,
this position was not filled for 4-1/2 months after it was approved. Therefore,
we have an $8,524.49 balance on this police officer's position that was not
spent.
We tested 150 applicants and held oral interviews for the top 20 candidates for
the community service officer position. After the interviews were completed,
all the applicants were rejected as not meeting our standards. $12,660.00 was
approved as a starting salary for this position. None of this money has been
Spent.
If we were to combine the community service officer salary with the police
officer salary, we would have a balance in the Police Division budget of
$21,184.49 for 1985.
We would like to make a request that we be allowed to hire an additional police
officer immediately (June, 1985). The amount required for that position for the
remainder of 1985 would be $13,260.31. We would also like to hire the community
service officer that was already approved in the 1985 budget. It will take at
least two (2) months to fill that position, therefore, the hiring would not take
place until August, 1985.
BALANCE $21,184.49
- 2 6 . 3 1 - hire one additional officer in June
BALANCE 8,924.18
5,275.00 hire approved CSO in August
OVERALL BALANCE 3,649.18
We accumulated the balance of $21,184.49 because one of the approved officers
was not hired until May 13, 1985 (approved for 1/1/85) and one community service
officer position would not be filled until August (approved for 1/1/85). Our
request is not asking for additional funds for 1985, only that we be given
approval to use a surplus amount for one additional position.
3(;-; ,
Carl Ju!lie
5/28/85
Page 2
OUR REASONS FOR THIS REQUEST ARE AS FOLLOWS:
It is imperative that we always have 3 marked patrol vehicles on duty 24 hours a
day. With present staffing, we cannot accomplish this.
We are finding more and more frequently that we are sending one officer on
domestics, alarms, fights, suspicious persons, prisoner details and other
dangerous calls. This is something that should not be happening.
Lieutenant Jim Clark has actually worked several patrol shifts to maintain the
minimum coverage. He has numerous responsibilities required by his position and
working patrol shifts is not one of them.
On several occasions during the past few months, we have had to call out the
fire department rescue squad to cover medical calls when we didn't have enough
patrol officers available to handle the call load. This is very expensive.
On several occasions during the nighttime hours, we have asked neighboring
departments to handle calls for us. The most serious event that is being
repeated is sending one patrol officer on domestic calls. That has happened
eleven times so far this month.
Our call load has increased greatly over the past few months. A normal shift
will require each patrol officer to handle 7-8 calls and we are finding our-
selves handling in excess of II calls and most recently, we have been in the 14
to 17 calls per officer range on some middle and day shifts.
Attached is a memo to the officers from Jim Clark restricting vacation requests
for the summer months. In addition to this, we have stopped all training and
schools during the summer except for three officers who will be attending spe-
cial training, seven officers who will be required by State Law to attend
lntoxilyzer training and a self defense course that all of us will be attending
for 8 hours each.
As you know, our secretarial staff is an excellent and hard working group,
however during the past three months, we have experienced a substantial increase
for Public Safety services which places an additional work load on this area.
To meet the required needs in this unit, we have authorized additional overtime
at night and weekends and three weeks ago, hired a Kelly Girl for the month of
May.
We are attempting to establish a fourth team that would work seven days a week
from 6:00 PM to 3:00 AM. That team would be made up from the two positions that
were approved in the 1985 budget and the third person would come from this
request. This would allow us to have additional coverage during our busiest
hours.
May 16, 1985
TO: CARL JULL1E
FROM:
JACK HACKING
SUBJECT:
STAFF PROBLEMS
A most recent example of the problems that we
a
r
e
d
e
a
l
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
h
a
p
p
e
n
e
d
l
a
s
t
night and today.
At 1:03 AM this morning, 1 was called at home
b
y
o
u
r
r
e
c
o
r
d
s
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
,
J
u
l
i
e
Wanquist and informed that Rick Rabenort was tra
n
s
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
a
p
e
r
s
o
n
t
o
M
e
t
h
o
d
i
s
t
Hospital for a blood test and that John Sorensen
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
l
e
f
t
a
l
o
n
e
i
n
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
and that I would have to be his backup. This h
a
p
p
e
n
e
d
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
w
e
o
n
l
y
w
e
r
e
a
b
l
e
to have two officers on duty on the C shift. T
h
e
r
e
a
s
o
n
I
w
a
s
c
a
l
l
e
d
i
s
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
I was the supervisor on call. The supervisor o
n
c
a
l
l
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
h
a
n
d
l
e
administrative problems and for backup on maj
o
r
s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
s
u
p
e
r
v
i
s
o
r
shouldn't be expected to handle these type of
t
h
i
n
g
s
b
u
t
w
e
c
a
n
'
t
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
officer to be out on duty alone and in this case t
h
a
t
i
s
w
h
a
t
h
a
p
p
e
n
e
d
.
This morning, we didn't have enough officers to
c
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
d
a
y
s
h
i
f
t
s
o
:
J
i
m
Clark, at this very hour, is working the A shift
a
s
a
p
a
t
r
o
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
.
K
e
i
t
h
Wall is now on vacation for two weeks so his wo
r
k
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
d
o
n
e
b
y
J
i
m
a
n
d
m
e
.
Not only is Jim responsible to do his regular assi
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
,
h
e
i
s
h
e
l
p
i
n
g
o
u
t
with some of the work that Keith is responsible
f
o
r
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
a
b
l
e
,
but having to work a 9 hour patrol shift several
t
i
m
e
s
a
m
o
n
t
h
i
s
t
o
o
m
u
c
h
.
Another example of situations that we are faced
w
i
t
h
i
s
a
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
w
e
h
a
d
yesterday concerning the community celebration
t
h
a
t
w
e
a
r
e
h
a
v
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
4
t
h
o
f
July. We think these are excellent for the comm
u
n
i
t
y
,
b
u
t
a
g
r
e
a
t
d
e
a
l
o
f
w
o
r
k
falls upon us for something like this. At our sta
f
f
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
y
e
s
t
e
r
d
a
y
,
i
t
w
a
s
decided that we would not allow any patrol off
i
c
e
r
t
o
t
a
k
e
v
a
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
4
t
h
and the juvenile and adult criminal units would
a
l
s
o
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
w
o
r
k
.
W
i
t
h
all the advertising that is being done concerning
t
h
i
s
c
e
l
e
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
radio stations and billboards from Naegele Sign
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
g
o
o
d
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
,
w
e
c
a
n
expect several thousand people. In addition to t
h
i
s
,
w
e
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
y
e
a
r
l
y
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
with all the people on the bluffs watching the
f
i
r
e
w
o
r
k
s
a
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
a
i
r
.
T
h
e
officers have never complained about this or an
y
o
t
h
e
r
a
s
s
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
w
e
h
a
v
e
given them, but we are receiving numerous com
p
l
a
i
n
t
s
a
b
o
u
t
n
o
t
h
a
v
i
n
g
e
n
o
u
g
h
help to cover shifts.
I know that you will do everything possible to
h
e
l
p
u
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
n
d
i
f
I can provide you with any additional informati
o
n
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
c
a
l
l
m
e
a
t
y
o
u
r
c
o
n
-
venience.
I '3
May 14, 1985
TO: CRIME CONTROL UNIT, COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS
FROM: LT. CLARK
SUBJECT:
SCHEDULE
Attached, find the June schedule.
The administration is very aware of everyone's concerns over our shortage of
staff. I want you to know that we are doing everything possible to get more
help. However, this will not happen overnight.
It has always been my policy not to disrupt your schedule any more than is abso-
lutely necessary. I am certain that you are also aware that in the vast
majority of the cases, we have granted almost every comp or vacation request.
Beginning with the July, 1985 schedule, only one officer per shift will be
granted vacation or comp at the same time unless a replacement officer can be
found without conflict.
We will also try to better coordinate training time to avoid conflicts. You
should, however, be aware that in many cases we have no choice when scheduling
training.
I would suggest that you get together as a team and decide how you want to
handle requests for time off.
Officer Luke has completed FTO training and will be working a power shift
through July. Our plan is to begin forming a power team. This team will rotate
with the other shifts but will give us that needed extra help at night. If you
have any questions about the forming of this team, please see me.
PLEASE LEAVE ME ANY IDEAS YOU MAY HAVE AS THEY RELATE TO MAKING OUR
SCHEDULE BETTER.
Thank you.
V V - - C V C C C V V C C - C - V V V V - C V C - C OSERLANDER C C RAPENORT - - BOSACF:ER - BERGSTROM r C SORENSEN C C VVVVV CCC- - C V V - - - 0 0 - - -CCCC CCCCC- - cLApr - - - -AAA 2 2 A SHI1" B SHIFT C. FHIFT 4€ 7 4 3 3 El WHITE DUCHSCHERE - SORENSEN A WALLACE A=0600-15Q0 B=1400-2700 C=2200-0700 D=0900-1E100 R=1S00-0700 -=OFF V=VACATION T=TPAIN/NE 0=COmP - Et A B F? A - A B. A A A A A A A A A A - D May has a total of 51 shifts that are below the required 3 cars per shift minimum. A , + .. ... 4 2 4+ 7+ 7 7 7 242+7 7+ 7 4 2 3 2 2+ 2+ 4 2 2 24- 2+ 2 2 2 2+ 2+ 2 2+ 2 7 2 2+ 2 7+ 7+ 4 7 4 7+ 7 MAY 15'85 7 18 V 14 8 0 SMTWP 12 13 14 15 16 A - - V R .5 0 - A F. A A A A V V A V A V A V A A - - A A A 11 A A 14 1 A A A A V A A V 17 A A El 2 B B _ F' - B B B El V V D B B F r V V - 8 0 0 9 B 0 0 PUN DATE: 05/22/P5 MATSON CONLEY ANDERSON LINDGREN EiLAE BROWN BRACE BLANCH F:r11.; LUKE T 14 PF s s N T 14 P r 19 20 21 22 22 24 2: 26 "' al 29.70 :1 VV- - -AAAAA- - -AAAAD- - -AAAA AAAAA- - -VAAAA AAA- - -AAAAA- - -AAAAA- - -PP B - 3 V V V - - B B B B 0 P P
II
X(1-(DONH.4
£0-
•
11+•.11,0
• L(1 0 rtln 0
H400. 0
1--•Z
O 001 -
O 0 ,< N In
£0W0
C) o
•
ppiP-taa
orwa0m
W 000
<0.Qrtort
Mrt 0" 0'
rtrliC0Z0'
O ht (D 1-4
11 (1 ,111,Z
P.
•
0001--,(110
o at< a
xamowom
1-toc0m O
•
apti,
O 0
pamozwa
O mmt-10'0
t4c4t-t
O 043.vart
ZM ft
O 0m,14-4£0'
40:311
'3"3 0 (D rt ft
1:1) 11 11 it
O x*00. E
P ty<w..m
P-1-IMh4ID
O 04011 4440"
O MMW
ZW 00'
mt-w0rtm
ID rt tu L-n
m00 ,-,. 0)0
1-4C,QCW(-4.40
0'4D :3"
rt10r4:10410'
In 0 U1 P. (D 0
• 47H 11 0 C3
MWM
a0 InO
za00t-ho
H 4-1,041147
a
•
0r. mt+,
mibmo-
(t)
O (I) 11 4710
(D cn • rt
£ tr-1
O (D 0 P)
:1 004-) rt
pc-aot-t;s'
C) 0 0 1-• (3)
(.3. • t)"
n(-.1 (D
•tp C) C)
H :3
'10'0
1- tr 0
O OMWti
1-,(1
r-rtibmm
• H.0 ,1
O 0:SOMC:
N O' 011:1
• 0
0 CD
44 44
EOE OWD n r77wwww r7:Dn3 MWWTO
D01: r cwrTTr ..rzoD clut0Dt0
rn. (01.0M D ToDD101) z.c017-1 mvxmwm
D rc.-1 III T miznz 07mru moDmm
H purl ... t nmzm mmTm0 zwnzr
O o r) X li "I I X (fl-(Z (0-170D
P TTIM -1-4-1 M 0 MTMTZ
O M Z Z Z071-10
O T 3 M
I M X
..,
ifl III 000 I ttninw wilDW DII0D 1-W
0
0
W I I 0(4 (A I Titnini woci itit 3>D1IDt.tu)
al ++ iii
•
WDI 000 I Ttnnnl wmittim DDIID(43
.a ++
o
o 01'0 (A(,to 1 ontnn1 IWW1 111 IDDIDA-4
I 0
0
v
0
n
fl
O IDW A00 I 100010 wiwwi ciDDivm
I.')
0
O 110 000 D inntin wiww1 <1D-itmw
0
• i D itninn 1011w< <11-1c ,am
0
0 D TIntni wwi(«DII<03
D Ttnnnt M
TnInni Iwtot< IDDicur
I TnInnn twww< 1.-IDDct,tx
I To!ntn I010101 iODDi 1
I 1nwnin 0110.c1 DIDDIULD
00(4 I inntln 10110<1 DIDDlosw
1 11ntnn WIICW
tarat,) t otniTt 101011-1 3>01-43>10-4
++
+
•
+
0 T100-11 1010110 3>011-1 -0£
I Tninnt 110101W 103>I3> 0 II
Tninnn iwwcw
I Tntnin 11010<1
04.0
0
I tonnin wtwci
04.0
I inntin wiww1
A3
H
110100 111 1100 3>1103> 4.11-4
I T-intn-t 3>0I13> PE
0
I Ttnnnt 101014w 3>01 Ii)
TnInnt !WM IODID WM
I TO1000 IWWOW IODCD -OW
0
I TnInIn IWWDI IODGI W G8/C2/S0 :31Va Nna DI D 10
1 101non 1ww10w 1DDDDuE
++
wur.:1 I Totnin 1www1 ADDD1CPT
++
co 1 t ta
o
++
toDto GI 1,)
++
0
O MDW 00N)
++
W WDW A00
O ++
0
WDW 000
13 ++
IDI
0
O I I
C, (4 I I (4 0 Cl
0
O 1W
O ODW
O P,
SQUARE SWORN RATIO PER
CITY MILES POPULATION PERSONNEL
1000 POP.
1 .. Shakopee 28
10,780 18 1.66
2. Hopkins 3.4
15,040
22
1.46
3. Golden Valley 10.5 22,410
29 1.29
4. South Lake Mtka 10,000
12
1.20
5. St. Louis Park
10 42,640 49
1.14
6. Bloomington 39 82,000
92
1.12
7. Richfield
72 37,240
42
1.12
8. EDEN PRAIRIE
36
24,000
26
1.08
9. Minnetonka 28 40,130 43
1.07
10. Edina 16
44,810
45
1.00
M_E_MORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Projection of City Staff Needs
September 11, 1984
( FO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
In response to the Council's request several months ago, the following is a five-year
. projection of additional City personnel we suggest will be necessary to keep pace
with continued development activities and population growth..
Statistics show that Eden Prairie continues to develop at a substantial rate. In
1983 new construction in Eden Prairie totalled $84.5 million. Except for the City of
Minneapolis, this was.the largest increase for any City in Hennepin County. Over the
past five years Eden Prairie has captured over 15% of all new construction in
Hennepin County (excluding Minneapolis). Only Bloomington at 17% exceeds our total.
So far in 1984 we are approximately 307: ahead of the record pace in 1983 in terms
of dollar value of new construction ($74 million versus $57 million through August
31st). .
In terms of population, our current estimate from the Metro Council as of 4/1/84 is
21,250. The total number of households is 7,540. Over the past four years we have
added 5,000 persons or 1,250 per year. It is reasonable to assume that our population
will be close to 30,000 by 1990 and probably at least 40,000 by the year 2,000.
Our records indicate that we have been adding about 7 miles per year of new streets
and utility lines since 1975. By 1990 we will have approximately 190 miles of City
streets and 425 miles of sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer lines to maintain.
The City park system also continues to expand. Currently we have 310 acres of
park land and public space, plus 30 miles of trails and sidewalks. Over the
next few years we will be addlng several parks - Homeward Hills, Hidden Glen, Willow,
Eden Valley, and Frani° Road - to our system plus five to 10 miles of trails.
Such continued development of the City will require the staff additions as shown on
the attached tabulation.
CJJ:jp
Attachment
131;"'
DEPARTMENT
MANAGER
ASSESSING
BUILDING INSPECTIONS*
PRESENT NO. OF
PERMANENT EMPLOYEES
4 (2 part time)
6 (2 part time)
8
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
NUMBER OF PERMANENT EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT
FUTURE ADDITIONS
1985 - 90
1 or 2 temporary
interns for special
projects each year
1 property appraiser
for 1985. 1 clerical
for 1987.
Staff level o.k. for now.
Add or delete staff as
building activity warrants
(salaries & costs covered
by fees).
Part time recreation
supervisor to full time
in '86-'87 when more
programs are developed.
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATION & REC.PGRMS.* 5 (I part time)
?ARK MTN. & FORESTRY* .12 1 maintenance person in
1986 and 1 in 1988.
COMMUNITY CENTER* 5 1985 - Add 1/2 time clerical/
receptionist position
1986 -90 - 1 maintenance
person if Community Center
is expanded.
FINANCE
6 1 accounting clerk in
1986
None
I project planner and part-
time overload clerical for
1985. For 1987 - 88, add
I planning technician
(drafting & technical support'
and an assistant planner for
zoning administration/814g. ,
Dept. liaison
LIQUOR STORES
7 (2 part time)
PLANNING*
7
PUBLIC SAFETY:
POLICE OFFICERS
24
CSO's 5
FIRE MARSHAL
ANIMAL CONTROL
I (part time - 4 hrs/day)
13),
- 2-
UVARTMENT
PRESENT NO. OF
PERMANENT EMPLOYEES
FUTURE ADDITIONS
1985 - 90
' CLERICAL
MAINTENANCE
5
2
Assuming population growth of 1,250 per ye
a
r
a
n
d
0
r
a
t
i
o
o
f
1
.
1
5
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
per 1,000 population and I CSO per 4 offi
c
e
r
s
t
o
l
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
E
d
e
n
Prairie, yields the following:
1985 - 2 officers and 1 CSO
1986 - 1 officer
1987 - 2 officers
1988 - 1 officer and 1 CSO
1989 - 2 officers
1990 - 1 officer
Additional needs are 1 fire inspector for
1
9
8
5
a
n
d
o
n
e
c
l
e
r
i
c
a
l
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
for 1986. Also, for 1985 we are proposing
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
i
m
a
l
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
coverage (4 hrs. per day more).
PUBLIC WORKS:
No changes for 1985.
1987 - add 1 civil engr.,
2 technicians and 1
clerical position
1985 - add 1 mtn. position
1986 - 90 - add 1 into.
-position per year.
1985 - no change
1987 - Add 1 part time positicr ,
1985 - Add 1 into. position
1987 - 90 - Add 1 into.
position for water plat.'
operation and 2 for
field work
ENGINEERING*
12 (1 part time)
STREET & DRAINAGE !ITN.* 14
MECHANICS
3
WATER DEPT.*
10
*These Departments hire temporary/seasonal
h
e
l
p
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.