Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 02/05/1985 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1985 7:3D PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BOARDROOM COUNCIL MEMBERS: . Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock and Paul Redpath CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson; City Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director John Frane; Planning Director Chris Enger; Director of Community Services Robert Lambert; Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. PRESENTATION OF FLAG FROM THE EDEN PRAIRIE AMERICAN LEGION #409 II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS III. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4 Page 369 1984 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 381 B. 2nd Readino of Ordinance No. 1-85, changing name of South Page 383 ire Lane between Ticonderoga Trail and Muirfield Addition to South Shore Lane West C. Resolution authorizing preparation of Feasibility Report for Page 384 1a lev View Road i provements between CSAH 4 and Mitchell Road, I.C.. 51-272 P.esolution No. B5-433) D. Receive Feasibility Report for Valley View Road improvements Page 385 between CSAH 4 and Mitchell Road I.C. 51-272, and set a • Public Hearing for March 5 1985-at 73O PM (Resolution No. 85-44) E. Final Plat approval for Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition Page 386 (Resolution No. 85-45 — 1 F. Final Plat approval for Preserve Commercial Park North 4th Page 389 dtion Resolution No. -4oF ,fir G. Final Plat Approval for Autumn Woods 2nd Addition (Resolution Page 392 " No. 85-471 H. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector Page 395 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,February 5, 1985 I. Final Sproval for Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of Page 396 6,000,000.00 for Eames Apartments Project (Resolution No. 85-49) j V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS by Derrick Land Company. Request Page 402 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential for 6.61 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances, on approximately 40 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 6.61 acres; Preliminary Plat of 14.25 acres into two lots and one outlot for two, 56-unit apartment buildings. Location: Gonyea 4th Addition, Outlot B. (Resolution No. 85-42 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance No. 2-85-1-PUD-1-85 - Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to Rm-2.5; Resolution No. 85-39 - Preliminary Plat) B. EDEN PRAIRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY by Hennepin County. Request for Page 435 7Tng District Amendment within a Public Zoning District on 2.51 acres for the construction of a 10,000 square foot building. Location: Southwest corner of Prairie Center Drive ' and Preserve Boulevard. (Ordinance No. 3-85 - Rezoning within • the Public District) C. BERGIN AUTO BODY by James J. Bergin. Request for Site Plan Page 443 Review within the I-2 Park District for one acre, with variances, to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 4.74 acres into three lots for an auto body repair shop. Location: North of Martin Drive, West of Corporate Way. (Ordinance No. 4-85 - Rezoning within the I-2 Park District; Resolution No. 85-40 - Preliminary Plat) D. ROBERTS LITHO by Hoyt Development. Request for Zoning District Page 455 Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on approximately 4.7 acres and Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into one lot for the construction of a 42,500 square foot office/warehouse building. Location: South of Highway #5, West of Mitchell Road at Technology Drive. l (Ordinance No. 5-85 - Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park; Resolution No. 85-41 - Preliminary Plat) E. Request for Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of $11,DOO,OD0.00 Page 468 for lanager Creek (Resolution No. 85-48 t. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 18324 - 18562 Page 469 t' VII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VIII. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of Ad Hoc Committee members to study Referendum Page 476 Issues for the City of Eden Prairie IX. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS 1 City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,February 5, 1985 X. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS ( XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members B. Report of City Manager • 1. Proposed Employee Benefits Changes (continued from Page 168 January 8, 1985) C. Report of City Attorney 1. Findings in connection with Welcome Home Page 478 XII. NEW BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL • TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1984 7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Director Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Karen Michael INVOCATION: Councilman Paul Redpath PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Councilman George Tangen was absent. I. APPRDVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS The following items were added to the Agenda: III. E. ...and approval of Special Assessment Agreement regarding Prairie Knoll; III. G. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 127-84, imposing a fee upon operators of facilities for mixed municipal solid waste (amending City Code Chapter 5); and VII. B. Request for grading plan revision regarding Woodlawn Heights Addition. The following item was removed from the Consent Calendar as item III. A. to VI. A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 121-84, zoning district change within the 1-2 District for 5.42 acres, approval of Developer's Aareement for Computer Depot, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-311, approving Sunnnary of Ordinance No. 121-84 and ordering publication of said Summary for Computer Depot. Location: north of Valley View Road, east of Highway P169. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Agenda and Other Items of Business as amended and published Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. Regular City Council Meeting held Tuesday. September 18, 1984 page II, para. 6, line 2: change "later" to "sor'etimes" { MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held September 1B, 1984, as amended. Motion carried unanimously. { City Council Minutes -2- December 4, 1984 B. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, September 25, 1984 { MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held September 25, 1984, as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 121-84, zoning district change within the I-2 District for 5.42 acres, approval of Developer's Agreement for Computer Depot, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-311, approving Summary of Ordinance No. 121-84 and ordering publication of said Sumnnary for Computer Depot. Location: north of Valley View Road, east of Highway #169. - to VI. A. B. Accept bid for tractor and snowblower C. Clerk's License List D. Final Plat approval for Carmel 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 84-312) E. Final Plat approval for Prairie Knoll and approval of Special Assess- ment Agreement regarding Prairie Knoll (Resolution No. 84-313) F. Final approval of Municipal Industrial Development 8onds in amount of $2,050,000.00 for McGlynn Bakeries (Resolution No. 84-315) G. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 127-84, imposing a fee upon operators of facilities for mixed municipal solid waste (amending City Code Chapter 5) MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt items B - G on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE AMDUNT OF $3,800,DDO.OD FOR DIGIGRAPHICS (Resolution No. 84-303) - continued from 11/6/84 City Manager Jullie noted that the proponents have withdrawn their request because other financing has been arranged. MOTION: 8entley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and to deny the request pursuant to withdrawal at the request of the proponent. Motion carried unanimously. B. 8LUFFS EAST 3RD ADDITION by The 81uffs Company, Request for zonino district change from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5 for 9.63 acres for 29 single family lots. Location: west of Franlo Road, south of Lee Drive. (Ordinance No. 128-84 - amending Ordinance No. 105-84 - rezoning from R1-13.5 to R1-9.5) - continued Public Hearing from November 20, 1984. '` n,./1 City Council Minutes -3- December 4, 1984 City Manager Jullie stated this item was continued from the November 20, 1984, meeting. Notice of the Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Wally Hustad Jr. addressed the request. Also present was Ron Dahlen, representing Argus Development. • Planning Director Enger indicated this request had been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meeting on October 29, 1984, at which time it voted (4-1) to recommend approval. Director of Public Works Dietz spoke to his memorandum of November 29, 1984, in which he addressed the events surrounding the erosion problem in the Bluffs East 3rd Addition area. Dietz noted the ultimate solution at the south end of the project would be to final design and construct permanent sedimentation/detention facility in the general vicinity of the existing temporary pond and to final design and construct approxi- mately 1200 feet of storm sewer from the pond along the flow line of the ravine to the Creek. Bentley said he had difficulty finding justification for this request. He said he wondered if the true purpose will be accomplished by it -- will it give a more crowded look since there would be larger homes on R. smaller lots. Enger stated the lots do meet the 13.5 category in area but do not have the width necessary on which to build a 13,5 size home. He said the rezoning of 29 lots could have gone before the Board of Appeals but Enger said he felt this was a rezoning rather than a variance. He said he would prefer to see the transition from 13.5 to 9.5 done along back lot lines rather than across the street from each other. Bentley asked about the legality in changing the platting. Enger said it would be similar to changes in other agreements. Bentley said he felt this was a platting problem and not a zoning problem -- that this was an attempt to replat through zoning. Enger said a number of options had been considered including: dropping a lot or two, going to the Board of Appeals for a variance, or rezoning -- and this was thought to be the proper procedure. Penzel said the premise of the 13.5 district was to provide for more open space between houses. He said he felt that what would happen with this request was there would be very wide houses on narrow lots. Enger noted the Planning Commission had concerns similar to those expressed by the Council. Enger said the property had been platted by the developer and it was the builder who was now wanting the change. He asked if it was a realistic situation to have 55' lots across from 85' lots. Dahlen said the idea was for this to be a transition area. He said he did not want to come out of this with something which would be difficult to sell; this was an unusual situation. t City Council Minutes -4- December 4, 1984 Bentley suggested the City check with the Watershed District regarding the drainage problem. He said he expected they would say there could ( be no further development in this area until the problem was corrected. Dietz said the City had communicated with the Watershed District and that was, indeed, what they suggested. Dietz said that, according to the.Watershed District, Hustad agreed to do that. Hustad stated that Bluffs East 3rd was not included in that agreement with the Watershed District. Anderson said he felt the City Council had an obligation to correct the problems in this area before any more development occurs. Redpath asked if the same drainage problems would occur with future development to the west of this area. Dietz said there are permanent ponds on those properties. Redpath said there are homes to the south of the Reichow property, within the Bluffs East development, which have mud in their basements when it rains. Hustad indicated there is a question regarding that as to whom is liable. Hustad said the paving of the Reichow driveway added to the problem; he would like to see that problem corrected shortly. Anderson said he felt the City had an obligation to resolve the drainage problems in this area. Bentley said the only control the City had left was with the issuance of building permits -- does the City have the right to withhold a building permit until the situation is rectified? City Attorney Pauly said the City does have some obligation because it is a part of the development process. • There was further discussion, with Dietz reviewing locations using maps, of the problem with the drainage and where the most erosion had occurred. Dietz said he felt the letter of September 24, 1984, from Wallace Hustad, Jr., re: Bluffs East Third Addition Storm Sewer, indi- cated a commitment to a permanent solution along with the next phases of this property. Penzel asked if that letter would assure the City that The Bluffs Company would defer the cost of this pipe. City Attorney Pauly said he felt it indicated there would be assessment against lots which were already developed; he did not feel it stated which would be the benefited properties. Hustad said the pipe would be installed, but he did not know who would pay for it. Redpath said the way he read the letter he felt that those who would be in the area yet to be developed would be the ones assessed for the costs. Hustad said there are other contributing factors here -- largely the lots to the north. Penzel said the commitment to provide the cost of drainage from that acreage existed with the development of that area. This was planned for. Since this development has occurred in an orderly ; fashion -- sequentially from the north to the south -- and done by the 1 same proponent and based on what previous commitments existed, one would assume the proponent has made appropriate provisions for taking care of the problem once he gets to the south end. Now we find out that might not be the case and the cost might be $100,000. Penzel said the question now is who is ultimately going to pay for this. Hustad said The Bluffs Company is trying to everythinci it can to resolve this -- he indicated `. the developer relies on the City for expertise particularly in the area i ( of engineering. Dietz noted the engineering plans are the responsibility i 311 I City Council Minutes -5- December 4, 1984 of the developer via his engineer. Dietz stated that he had requested the proponent clarify the situation with the Third Addition along with a preliminary design for an outfall from that area -- how it was going to be done and who was going to pay for it. Redpath said the fact is the drainage has been altered in that area -- one only has to go into the area to see what has happened. Bentley said he felt a decision could be based on what the proponent was willing to commit to. Hustad said he felt there should be some type of facility installed to correct the problem. Penzel asked if The Bluffs Company would be willing to put up a $125,000 bond and let the engineers do the work. Hustad said it is a legal matter now and not something he could do. Anderson said he had walked the area prior to any development and had done so again recently. He said he felt something should be done very quickly about the erosion problem. Redpath asked Enger to restate the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion. Enger said the Commission had recommended the lots with Purgatory Creek frontage not be rezoned to 9.5 but be retained as 13.5 and that the rezoning on the balance of the lots be conditioned on no futher . subdivision of those lots. Anderson asked if this was part of the conservancy area. Enger said it was. Redpath asked if the drainage issue could be tied into the request under consideration. Pauly said he did not think there was any plan which was definite enough and it would be quite difficult to do this. Bentley said he felt there was a lot of nebulousness regarding this issue; he did not feel this was ready for resolution at this time. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue this Public Hearing to December 18, 1984. Pauly asked if the time would be realistic. Bob Robertson, RCM, said a preliminary plan had been submitted but final plans had not been drawn. He further noted that the concept plan has been approved by City Staff and the Watershed District. He indicated this would be ready for construc- tion next season. Penzel asked when final plans would be ready for Council review. Robertson said they could be ready in a month. Bentley said the Council would have an idea on the 18th as to when the Hearing should be continued. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion caried unanimously. City Council Minutes -6- December 4, 1984 C. AXEL DENTAL OFFICE by Richard C. Axel. Request for zoning district change within Office District for a Dental Office and preliminary plat of 0.9 acres for one lot. Location: southwest quadrant of Highway #5 and County Road #4. (Ordinance No. 129-84 - amending Ordinance No. 82-03 within Office zoning district and Resolution No. 84-309 - approving pre- liminary plat) City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. Richard C. Axel, proponent, addressed the request. Planning Director Enger noted the Planning Commission had reviewed the request at its meeting on November 13, 1984, at which time it voted (5-0) to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in the Staff Report dated November 9, 1984, and with the suggestion that this should be brought back to the Planning Commission should the site plan change significantly in an effort to comply with the thirty foot setback from the street. This item was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Penzel asked about the road connection which at one time was comtemplated to be. Enger stated an easement provides cross-access to the lot to the north. Axel said there is an easement agreement in place and it is intended that will be put in. Penzel asked about the wood exterior of the building. Axel explained how patients react to various building types; he said he did not want to pro- ject a sterile image. Redpath said one less brick building might not be bad. Axel noted the Planning Commission felt it could not send a recom- mendation to the Council approving of wood, but the Commission indicated it had no objection to wood. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 129-84, rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 84-309, approving the preliminary plat of Axel Dental Office for Richard C. Axel. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to prepare an amendment to the prior Developer's Agreement relating to prior Ordin- ance No. 82-103 as per Commission and Staff recommendations as well as those of the Council. ��L/ City Council Minutes -7- December 4, 1984 Bentley said he questionned the exterior material and noted he would feel much better about it if the exterior were basically of brick with wood accents. Anderson stated there were some nice combinations of brick and wood buildings in the City already and he felt a little brick on the building would be good. Redpath said he supported the wood building. VOTE DN THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. D. CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH. Request for zoning district amendment within Public District for Church expansion on 2.78 acres. Location: 78DD Carnelian Lane. (Ordinance No. 131-84 - amending Ordinance No. 78-33 within Public Zoning District) City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the area had been notified. Wayne Jeske, architect for the.proponent, spoke to the request. Planning Director Enger stated this request had been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 13, 1984, meeting at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in the November 9, 1984, Staff Report. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 131-84, zoning amendment. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to prepare an amendment to the prior Developer's Agreement relating to prior Ordinance No. 78-33 as per Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. E. LAKE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION by Lake Heights Ventures. Request for zoning district change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 and preliminary plat of 1.85 acres into four single family residential lots. Location: southeast quadrant of Homeward Hills Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. (Ordinance No. 13D-84 - amending Ordinance No. 79-04 changing zoning district from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 and Resolution No. 84-310 - preliminary plat) City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified. 3-6 City Council Minutes -8- December 4, 1984 Steve Ryan, representing the proponent, addressed the request. Director of Planning Enger noted this had been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 13, 1984, meeting at which time it voted to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in the Staff Report dated November 9, 1984, as amended. There was no report from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resouces Commission. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 130-84, zoning amendment. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-310, approving the preliminary plat of Lake Heights 2nd Addition for Lake Heights Ventures. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to prepare an amendment to the prior Developer's Agreement relating to prior Ordin- ance No. 79-04 as per Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 17195 - 17443 • MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims Nos. 17195 - 17443. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 121-84, zoning district change within the I-2 District for 5.42 acres, approval of Developer's Agreement for Computer Depot, and adoption of Resolution No. 84-311, approving Summary of Ordinance No. 121-84 and ordering publication of said Summary for Computer Depot. Location: north of Valley View Road, east of Highway #169 - formerly III. A. Dan Russ, Welsh Corp., and Darrell Anderson, architect, were present to answer questions. Planning Director Enger related the Staff's concern regarding this proposal. He stated that the materials submitted to the City Council when this was Ist read do not correspond closely with the document submitted with the Developer's Agreement; the drawings do not show glass along the lower elevations as Anderson showed on the drawing. Enger said the purpose in bringing this back to the Council was only because it was different from what had been shown on the earlier plans and he wanted the Council to be aware of the change. City Council Minutes -9- December 4, 1984 Anderson reviewed architectural plans for the building and said he felt this building would be an asset to this area. Bentley noted his recollections and said his concern at the time had been the fact that these areas were represented as porcelainized panels and he had a concern about that. Darrell Anderson indicated they had erred at that point. Anderson asked if this building would be visible from Digigraphics. Architect Anderson indicated it would not. Bentley said he appreciated the diligence of the Planning Department in picking up this change. The Council concurred. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to give 2nd Reading to Ordinance No. 121-84, rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. B4-311, approving Summary of Ordinance No. 121-84 and ordering publica- tion of said Summary for Computer Depot. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Thomas J. Esser, Executive Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council, to appear before the Council - continued from November 20, 1984 Tom Esser introduced himself as the new Executive Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council. He said the 1985 Budget request from Eden Prairie is $5,335 which is the same as last year. Esser stated he would like the relationship with the City to be an active one rather than passive and he would like to meet with the City officials periodically. He indicated the Council will be reporting to the municipalities on a quarterly; basis. • B. Request for grading plan revision regarding Woodlawn Heights Addition Director of Public Works Dietz outlined the request. Dietz said Staff feels it is ultimately a good alteration to the project but was concerned because there had been no citizen input. Penzel asked how the erosion would be controlled. Dietz said they are considering a sodding plan whereby all front yards would be sodded. Director of Community Services Lambert said he has had phone calls from prospective buyers inquiring about park and playground facilities in that area. He said questions were raised by what had been said to these prospective buyers by the sales people. Anderson said he felt the residents in that area should be notified as to what the grading plans are. This could be accomplished via a public meeting. • .1 )-) City Council Minutes -10- December 4, 1984 City Attorney Pauly noted that if the grading permit had been tied into the original Developer's Agreement for this area then this change { might represent a change in the Developer's Agreement. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Bentley, to notify residents and have the grading plan presented to the residents by the proponent. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members Penzel - noted a letter from Joel Katz, "in/DOT, relative to the signals at Prairie Center Drive and TH 169 and the fact that these signals had been dropped in priority. Penzel asked for suggestions as to how to proceed to see that this project is implemented shortly. Redpath suggested a letter be sent to State Representative Pauly who is on the Transportation Committee. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct Staff to communi- cate with our State Representatives and State Senators regarding this matter. Motion carried unanimously. B. Report of City Manager 1. Request to apply to the State of Minnesota Competitive MIDB Pool for Hoyt Construction for its Tech III building in the amount of $2,700,000.00 Finance Director Frane addressed the request. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize application to the States's MIDB Pool for Hoyt Construction for its Tech III building. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Set Special City Council meeting for December 20, 1984, at 7:30 PM to consider preliminary and final approval of Municipal Industrial Development Bonds for Hoyt Construction Tech III Office Building MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to set a special meeting of the City Council for 7:3D p.m. on Thursday, December 20, 1984, in the School Administration Building, BIRD School Road, to consider preliminary and final approval of Muncipal Industrial Development Bonds for Hoyt Construction Tech III Office Building. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -11- December 4, 1984 3. Agreement to conduct Special Census y City Manager Jullie referred to his memorandum of November 27, 1984, in which this issue was addressed. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute an agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce to conduct a special census for an amount estimated to be $30,465. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath and. Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 4. Discussion on response to Flying Cloud Landfill EIS The Council commended Assistant to the City Manager Dawson on his memorandum. Penzel suggested the Council request the Metropolitan Council consider a post closure bond to insure that citizens of this community are not left "holding the bag" should something go wrong. Penzel reviewed the meetings at which time the EIS will be considered by the Metropolitan Council and/or its committees. MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt the "Response of the City of Eden Prairie to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Expansion of the Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill." Motion carried unanimously. C. Report of the City Attorney There was no report, D. Report of Director of Community Services 1. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Access Purchase Director of Community Services Lambert addressed his memorandum of November 27, 19B4, in which this was discussed. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to authorize Staff to begin negotiations with the appropriate property owners to secure a purchase agreement or option agreement for a minimum of 3.5 acres for the major access to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes -12- December 4, 1984 2. Riley Lake Park Purchase Director of Community Services Lambert spoke to his memorandum of November 27, 1984, in which this issue was addressed. 'MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize Staff to submit a purchase agreement to Mr. Hendrickson based on the total purchase price of $95,000. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath, and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 3. Agreement with Watershed District for Study of Purgatory Creek Recreation Area/Staring Lake Director of Community Services Lambert referred to his memorandum of November 27, 1984. MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize entering into an agreement with the Watershed District for a joint study of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Floodplain and Staring Lake Water Quality at a cost not to exceed $5,000 to each party. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously. 4. Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission request for Ad hoc Committee to consider need for referendum Director of Community Services Lambert noted his memorandum of November 27, 1984, in which this was reviewed. Redpath asked if this committee would be strictly for informational purposes with no firm recommendations -- this would only be a study committee. Lambert said he felt this committee would probably come up with firm recommendations as to what might be put before the voters as well as a timetable. Bentley asked who would appoint this committee. Lambert said he felt the City Council should do so upon recommendations from various groups. This committee would then report back to the City Council through the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to instruct Staff to solicit names of those interested in serving on an ad hoc committee to consider the need for referenda for community facilities. This committee is to be broad-based and will examine bond needs for the next ten years. The Committee will be appointed by the City Council at its meeting on February 5, 1985. Motion carried unanimously. IX. NEW BUSINESS There was none. X. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adjourn the meeting at 10:55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST February 5, 1985 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) PLUMBER ABJ Enterprises, Inc. Aarons Plumbing Charter Builders, Inc. All-American Mechanical, Inc. Crawford-Merz Construction Blaylock Plumbing Grommesch Construction Co. Crosstown Plumbing, Inc. Herliev Helle Egan & Sons Company Imker Construction C. Fadden & Sons Knutson Construction Hopkins Plumbing & Heating Co. Lovering Associates, Inc. Hovde Plumbing & Heating Michael Construction, Inc. Jerry's Plumbing Mikkelson-Wulff Remodeling Key Plumbing & Heating Oakwood Builders, Inc. M & 0 Plumbing & Heating, Inc. • Opus Construction McQuire Mechanical Services, Inc. Quality Homes, Inc. Mickelson Plumbing, Inc. S. J. Schneider Construction Minnesota Mechanical, Inc. Stiglich Construction Northern Plumbing & Heating United Properties P J Plumbing & Heating W. J. White Company R. J. Miller Plumbing, Inc. Project Plumbing CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Richfield Plumbing Co. Sarah, Inc. American Dream Homes Solberg Plumbing Argus Development, Inc. Standard Plumbing & Appliance Co. '. Centex Homes Swanson & Schiager Durabilt Associates, Inc. Thompson Plumbing Finnamore Bldg. Corporation Westonka Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Hipp's Construction Co. Kaster Construction, Inc. WATER SOFTENER Kellett Builders, Inc. King Construction Surge Soft Water Lake Minnetonka Homes, Inc. Lan-De-Con, Inc. WELL DRILLING 3' Lee Masonry 1 Lenzen Construction Dependable Well Co. i Darley G. March E. H. Renner & Sons Robert H. Mason, Inc. Max Renner Well Co., Inc. 1 "Ole" Time Construction ' Prairie Construction UTILITY INSTALLER 1 Realistic Building & Remodeling 1 The Rottlund Company, Inc. Alta Mechanical Sawhorse, Inc. Mickelson Plumbing, Inc. Ordeen Splittstoser Construction T & E Construction REFUSE COLLECTOR Orrin Thompson Homes Wooddale Builders, Inc. Admiral Waste Management Jacobson Sanitary Service ( SOLICITOR Admiral Waste Management (Patrick Blood & Nancy Lee) • CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST page two HEATING & VENTILATING VENDING Air Comfort, Inc. A & J Enterprises Aldo, Inc. ARA Services Allied Mechanical Services, Inc. Allen Arthur, Inc. D. J.'s Heating & Air Conditioning Barter Exchange, Inc. Dependable Heating & Air Conditioning Coca Cola Bottling Co. Egan & Sons Company Dircon Enterprises Fredrickson Heating & Air Conditioning Griswold Vending Co. Heating & Cooling Two, Inc. Minnesota Viking Food Service, Inc. Lake-Air Heating & Cooling Co. Toro Manufacturing Company M & D Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Twin City Vending Minnesota Mechanical, Inc. Zupan Vending Service Northern Plumbing & Heating Canteen Co. of Minnesota SBS Mechanical, Inc. George Sedgwick Heating & Air Cigarette Southside Heating & Air Conditioning Suburban Air Conditioning,Co. A & J Enterprises Thompson Air Conditioning Co. ARA Services Canteen Co. of Minnesota GAS FITTER Griswold Vending Co. Minnesota Viking Food Service, Inc. Fredrickson Heating & Air Conditioning Mark's Eden Prairie Standard J & H Gas Services Texaco. Lake-Air Heating & Cooling Co. Twin City Vending Northern Plumbing & Heating George Sedgwick Heating & Air Conditioning TYPE B FOOD MECHANICAL GAMES ARA Services PDQ Food Store Advance Carter Aladdin's Castle TYPE C FOOD Lion's Tap PDQ Food Store RETAIL CANDY Mark's Eden Priarie Standard PDQ Food Store RETAIL CANDY OUTLET FOOD VEHICLE Fanny Farmer Candy Shop A & J Enterprises PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE Joan Coleman These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. (2,4441 Pat Solie, Licensing 4 _ 1 >(2. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE 1-85 BE IT ORDAINED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the following street shall be renamed: South Shore Lane between Ticonderoga Trail and Muirfield Addition to South Shore Lane West. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on January 22, 1985, and finally read, adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on the 5th day of I. C February, 1985. • • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • 3G CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 85-43 RESOLUTION ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPDRT WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 51-272, Valley View Road Improvements Between CSAH 4 and Mitchell Road and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESDLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: rr That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for t_ study with the assistance of BRW. Int., and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on February 5, 1985. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DATE: January 31, 1985 SUBJECT: Valley View Road Improvements Feasibility Report, I.C. 51-272 • Included in the February 5, 1985, Council agenda is Resolution 85-44, which authorizes the preparation'of a feasibility report for Valley View Road. The City Council actually authorized this report in early 1984 during a discussion on Capital Improvement projects. Adoption of this resolution merely reconfirms what has already been accomplished by motion and provides a paper record that indicates the City Council requested the feasibility report as opposed to a petition being received from benefitting property owners. EAD:sg � r . l CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 85-44 • RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR A HEARING WHEREAS, a report has been given by the City Engineer to the City Council on February 5, 1985, recommending the following improvements to wit: I.C. 51-272, Valley View Improvements Between CSAH 4 and Mitchell Road NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of property abutting or within said boundaries for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to M.S.A. Section 429.011 to 429.111, at an estimated total cost of the improvments as shown. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvment on the 5th day of March, 1985, at 7:30 P.M. at the Eden Prairie School Administration Building, 8100 School Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The City Clerk shall give published and mailed notice of such hearing on the improvements as required by law. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on February 5, 1985. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 85-45 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MITCHELL LAKE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duty had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition is approved upon compliance with the recom- mendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated January 29, 1985. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on February 5, 1985. Gary 0. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk ( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT ' TD: Mayor Penzel and City Council Members THRDUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works n FROM: David L. Dlson, Senior Engineering Technician lf�.�a DATE: January 29, 1985 SUBJECT: MITCHELL LAKE ESTATES 3RD ADDITIDN PROPOSAL: The owner, Bridge Wheel Company, Inc. has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition, located south of T.H. 5 (West 78th Street) in the South 1/2 of Section 8 and North 1/2 of Section 17. The Development Proposal for this property was submitted by Dr. Richard C. Axel for the construction of a Dental Office. The division is a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition. HISTDRY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on December 18, 1984, per Resolution 84-3D9. The approval consisted of 0.9 acre for one lot (Lot 2, Block 1). Zoning of Lot 2, Block 1 to Office was finally read and approved by the City Council on January 8, 1985, per Ordinance 129-84. Matting and zoning procedures, con- sistant with City Code requirements, will be necessary prior to any development of Lot 1, Block 1. Resolution 85-1, approved by the City Council on January 8, 1985, summarizes specific conditions for approval of the proposal. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All necessary municipal utilities and streets to serve the site have been installed. Cross easements covering access and maintenance of the private roadway connection between T.H. 5 and Terry Pine Court must be provided to the Engineering Department prior to release of the plat. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will conform to City Code requirements. 3bt) Page 2 of the final plat of Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition, 1/29/85 BONDING: Municipal utilities and streets will not be installed within this addition, therefore, bonding will not be required. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition, subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution 85-1 and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $100.00. 2. Receipt of cross easements documents. • DLO:sg cc: Lee Johnson • J i I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 85-46 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of The Preserve Commercial Park North 4th Addition has been submitted has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for The Preserve Commercial Park North 4th Addition is approved upon compliance with the f recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated January 29, 1985. • B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six month maximum. time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the City Council on February 5, 1985. • Gary O. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members is THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician DATE: January 29, 1985 SUBJECT: THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK NORTH 4TH ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, The Preserve, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of the Preserve Commercial Park North 4th Addition. The plat, previously approved as The Preserve Commercial Park North 3rd Addition, contains approximately 2.8 acres with the division to consist of 5 lots. Field survey and building layout errors have resulted in the construction of buildings and common walls which are not in alignment with the lot liners of the previously approved plat. Approval of this revised plat is necessary to eliminate title and description conflicts, but making minor changes in lot line locations. HISTORY: PUD concept approval for Area G of the Preserve was granted by the City Council on September 2, 1975, per Resolution 1033. Zoning to C-Regional Service was finally read and approved by the City Council on May 3, 1977, per Ordinance 357. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on March 27, 1984, per Resolution 84-56. VARIANCES: Variance requests were reviewed by the Board of Appeals on May 10, 1984. Variances approved for the 3rd Addition will also apply to this proposal. A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities necessary to serve this site have been installed. The on site utilities needed to serve the individual lots wilt be installed privately and will be owned and maintained by the property owners served. An agreement . covering maintenance of the utilities and roadway/parking J.1,� Final Plat, The Preserve Commercial Park North 4th Addition areas must be submitted to the Engineering Department and filed concurrent with the final plat. The submitted proposal calls for zero tot line variances, • therefore, the normal requirement for utility and drainage easements along the interior lot lines would become an . encumberance to the plat and should be waived. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication shall be in conformance with City Code. BONDING: Bonding shall be in conformance with City Code. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of The Preserve Commercial Park North 3rd Addition subject to the requirements of this report and the following: 1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $100.00. 2. Receipt of documents covering maintenance of on site utilities, roadways, and parking areas. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Tom Arneson, BRW, Inc. • Mr. Larry Peterson, The Preserve is CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESDTA RESOLUTIDN ND. 85-47 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT DF. AUTUMN WDDDS 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Autumn Woods 2nd Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED SY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. Plat approval request for Autumn Woods 2nd Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City • Engineer's report on this plat dated January 30, 1985. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.2D Subd. 2.A. waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADDPTED by the City Council on February 5, 1985. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL j John D. Frane, Clerk 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician ] DATE: January 30, 1985 SUBJECT: AUTUMN WOODS 2ND ADDITION PROPOSAL: The developer, Trumpy Homes, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Autumn Woods 2nd Addition located southeasterly of Rymarland Camp 2nd Addition and west of Dell Road in the South 1/2 of Section 7. The proposed plat consists of 14 single family residential lots on approximately 5.7 acres, and is a replat of part of Outlot I, Autumn Woods. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on April 3, 1984, per Resolution 84-68. Zoning to RI-9.5 was finally read and approved by the Council on May 1, 1984, per Ordinance 25-84. Resolution 84-83, approved by the City Council on May 1, 1984, summarizes specific conditions for approval of the proposal. An overall development plan, .referred to within the Resolution, must be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to release of the plat. VARIANCES: A variance from the requirements of City Code 12.20, Subd. 2.A, waiving the six month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat will be necessary. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities, streets and walkways will be installed throughout the addition in conformance with City standards and Resolution 84-83. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication requirements are defined in Resolution 84-83 and will be as required through the City Code. BONDING: Bonding shall conform to the requirements of the City Code. Page 2, Final Plat Report of Autumn Woods 2nd Addition, 1/30/85 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Autumn Woods 2nd Addition subject to the requirements of this report, Resolution 84-83 and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $365.00. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,404.00. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $560.00. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 5. Receipt of development plan specified in Resolution 84-85. DLO:sg cc: Mr. Dennis Trumpy, Trumpy Homes, Inc. Mr. Ron Krueger, Krueger and Assoc. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE o' Agronomy Services Division �,� 90 West Plato Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55107 fw'~ '« Telephone: (612) 296-6123 NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT REED INSPECTOR F04 City, Vittage, oa Towrliilp • Complete this form in TRIPLICATE. SEND: Original to the attention of the SECTION OF WEED CONTROL at the above address. First Copy to your County Agricultural Inspector. Second Copy to your Local CIerk. • T0: THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, 1973, Chapter 18.231, Paragraphs 2 and 3, per- taining to assistant weed inspectors, I, Gary D. Peterson of (Mayor es-Chairman) Eden Prairie of Hennepin County' (City, Village, or Township) Minnesota, do hereby appoint Mr. Wes Dunsmore , whose address is 8950 Eden Prairie Road and telephone number is q17-7767 . to be Assistant Weed Inspector for the period beginning January 1, . 1985 , and continuing until such time as the Town Board or (Month i Date) Mayor wishes to terminate said appointment. at a wage of $ - 0 - per month, or $ _ 0 per day. or $ - 0 - per hour. This appointment confers on said appointee all the duties, authority and privileges of any local weed inspector as outlined by law. Signature (Mayor) signature (Chairman of Township Board) Date Signed Street Address City S State Zip Code 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, MN, S5'taa AG 00107-01 {}��J MEMORANDUM • TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THROUGH: CARL JULLIE, CITY MANAGER ' FROM: RICHARD F. ROSOW, CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: MINNESOTA MULTI-FAMILY BOND POOL--EAMES APARTMENT PROJECT--$6,000,000 DATE: JANUARY 31, 1985 Preliminary approval to this housing finance project was given by the Council on August 28, 1984. Since that time, it has been proposed by Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood that the financing take place in combination with approximately seven other projects undertaken by six different developers by a bond issue of approximately $34,000,000 underwritten by Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood. All of the projects are rental housing and are located in the metropolitan area. In order to combine the developments in one bond issue, it has been proposed that a Joint Powers Agreement be entered into by the cities in which the various projects are located. The Joint Powers Agreement would designate the St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the issuer of the bonds. The bonds will be issued on the basis of a bond resolution adopted only by the St. Paul HRA. Each community involved in this • project would execute a Regulatory Agreement with the developer, the bond trustee, and the St. Paul HRA. Any special require- ments that the City of Eden Prairie has for this project would be contained in Exhibit "C" to the Regulatory Agreement. On Memorandum Page Two January 31, 1985 past housing financing projects, the City has not required special conditions, other than those currently required by state and federal regulations for projects of this type. A draft of the Joint Powers Agreement and Regulatory Agreement are on file with the City Finance Director. The Joint Powers Agreement provides that each city agrees to indemnify and hold each other city, including the issuer, harmless from all losses incurred or suffered by the other cities with respect to the bonds, the development, and the program, but limited in that each city is obligated to the issuer and the other cities only to the extent that losses are caused by the development located within the jurisdiction of the indemnitor. With respect to matters not directly attributable to a particular development, each city is obligated to indemnify the other cities only to that percentage that the bonds issued for the development in the indemnitor's city bears to the total amount of the bond issue. Approvement of the Joint Powers and Regulatory Agreements are the equivalent of passing a final resolution in this matter. The City will not have to pass a final bond resolution, as that will be done by the issuer, St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The Regulatory Agreement is not in final form yet, and if the Council wishes to impose any special requirements relating to multi-family housing projects, that can be accom- plished even after passage of the resolution. RFR:cw y7 RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT PROGRAM FOR FINANCING RENTAL HOUSING, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF JOINT PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY WHEREAS: (A) The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, by a Resolution No. 84-225 adopted on August 28, 1984, has approved a multi-family rental housing development, known as the "Eames Apartments Project" and the financing thereof pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C; (B) It is now proposed that the Eames Apartments Project should be financed, together with certain other multi-family rental housing projects located in various municipalities in the State of Minnesota, pursuant to a single issue of revenue bonds or obligations; (C) It is anticipated that such revenue bonds or obligations will be structured as a "loan-to-lender" transaction with Midland Financial Savings and Loan Association of Des Moines, Iowa acting as the "Lender", and that the bonds will be underwritten by Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated of Minneapolis, Minnesota; (D) It is further proposed that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (the "St Paul HRA") should issue the revenue bonds or obligations, acting on behalf of itself with respect to certain projects located within the city limits of the City of Saint Paul, and on behalf of such other municipalities, including this City, as may approve the financing of multi-family rental housing projects located therein for financing pursuant to a joint program; (E) It appears that such an issue of bonds or obligations to finance a joint financing program will result in substantial financial benefits to the developers of the multi-family rental housing developments and will accordingly assist the economic viability of such developments and will result in lower rental housing costs to the residents of such developments; 1))/1 (F) There has been submitted to this City Council a form of Joint Powers Agreement providing for a joint housing program and for the issuance of bonds or obligations to finance such joint housing program; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby approves the financing of the Eames Apartments Project, together with certain other multi-family rental housing developments located in various municipalities in the State of Minnesota, by the issuance of a single issue of revenue bonds or obligations to be issued by the St. Paul MA on behalf of itself and all of such other municipalities. 2. The form of the Joint Powers Agreement submitted to this City Council is hereby approved. The Mayor and such other officers or employees of the City as may be appropriate are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Joint Powers Agreement upon execution thereof by such other municipalities or other political subdivisions as may also approve the financing of multi-family rental housing developments located in each of them for financing under the joint program. This City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and other appropriate officers and employees of the City to execute the Joint Powers Agreement with such variations, alterations, modifications or other changes as may be required to effectuate the purposes of this resolution and are not, in the opinion of the City Attorney, materially adverse to the interests of this City. 3. The financing program for the Eames Apartment Project, together with the financing programs for the other multi-family rental housing developments to be financed under the joint program, is hereby authorized to be submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in combined form and as may be appropriate to secure the approval of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to the joint program and the financing of all of the multi-family rental housing developments to be included therein. 4. The Mayor and other appropriate officers or employees of the City are further authorized and directed to execute a Regulatory Agreement by and among the developer of the Eames Apartment Project, the St. Paul IIRA as Issuer of the bonds, the City, the Lender and the Trustee for the revenue bonds or obligations issued to finance the joint program, and such other parties as may be appropriate. Such Regulatory Agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and shall contain such terms and conditions as may be required to implement this City's policies with respect to rental housing, with respect to the payment of fees, expenses and other charges associated with revenue bond financing, and with respect to any other matters which would normally be included in agreements between the City and the developer of a rental housing project financed by revenue bonds. The approvals and authorizations contained in this resolution are hereby made expressly subject to the execution of such Regulatory Agreement containing such terms and conditions as are acceptable to the Mayor and City Attorney. 5. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will execute the Regulatory Agreement. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not execute the Regulatory Agreement should the City at any time prior to the execution thereof determine that it is in .. the best interest of the City-not to execute the Regulatory Agreement or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of the Regulatory Agreement or any of the documents required for the transaction. 6. All commitments of the City expressed herein are sub- ject to the condition that by December 31, 1985, the City and the applicant shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Regulatory Agreement and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time, this Resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of February, 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk '7( Resolution No. 85- was moved by Councilmember. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. IIj /oI CITY OF EOEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 85-42 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, the proposal of Derrick Land Company for development of Prairie Village Apartments for High Oensity Residential use requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: approximately 6.61 acres located at the northeast quadrant of County Road #4 and Highway #5 be modified from Office and Medium Oensity Residential to High Density Residential. ADOPTEO by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 5th day of February, 1985, • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: • John 0. Frane, City Clerk • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #85-39 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS FOR DERRICK LAND COMPANY • 8E IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: • That the preliminary plat of Prairie Village Apartments, by Derrick Land Company, dated December 5, 1984, consisting of 14.25 acres into two lots and one outlot for two, 56-unit apartment buildings, a copy of which is on file at the City H.a11, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of February, 1985. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: • • 1 D. Frane, City CTrk • • • 0) JAN 2 911;85 Petition to the City Council • of till City of Fean Pr lrie The undersigned owners of real estate neighboring the currently developing Oonyea property in the North East quadrant of State Highway No.5 and Hennepin County Road No. 4 hereby strenuously voice their opposition to the proposed amendment to the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plea which dos not propose high density housing in the above mentioned area.Our opposition is based mainly on the fol low ing reams: 1.The proposed amendment,if carried out,constitutes spot zoning which is contrary to orderly zoning prcures. 2.The proposed amendment,if carried out;would locate high density residential property immediately adjacent to single family residential property,separated only by a berm with no other allowance for transition. 3.The proposed amendment,if carried out,would establish a precedent for other ill-conceived future amendment proposals to the Guide Plan. 4.The proposed amendment,if carried out,would unnecessarily raise already high traffic counts on County Rood 4 and cause expensive traffic control devices to be built in addition to alreaP proposed improvements to County Rood 4 end State Highway 5. 5.The proposed amendment,if carried out,would locate housing for the elderly in an area which would result in elderly pedestrian traffic crossing County Rood 4 that had a 1983 traffic count of 10,000 vehicles par thy. The undersigned owners of real estate in Eden Prairie further wish to state that long range planning should be incorporated in zoning for high density and especially high density housing for the elderly rather then helter-skelter Guide Plan amendments as proposed.Thank you for your consideration. Name Address k./',:%n, .9' �� ,4.7.�•.�y- 75-6/ 1/U.r,--, fit_ A' /'. '937- :SS3 % n ( r/ f a 4- \),A-0-o Is.91 AL.,,,,,,Pi. E P 1 .Gw-' -7571 u...,-- T( c: v A kon 41 -IC,.. ,\ P 937--1.-10 Z `C_ llA,, VIA,.'N I 190,2 0111.11hv k)i. elf 61:7— O rJ11.2. aiqz—T7:1—iA,/;-c, 7 57,2 4/aftm fi El k i e7 757,2 El(4 ii a E p y37-7PgLf 'Hr.,.►,-\ ,LtAA _ `730 U.A0A VI(As.. 4 0 937-gg93 i L L 7 c >0/ ,-- 4,fi.,,,,L /37 fq atitA) p1/t,j/`7�. 71c6'() A].yJ'(n :il, nm- 1az,.-)za / _ il�-4/(%, C./ .•; 44(/ 93�(745 /ble)- >,' , ...7c J6 4l/v 7 €.1z..G, �"``3 9 3 7-s os-, . gG1Y�. �.� . r�,'�`, 1,sGa 447 -er tt1.�,-9 L3?-21 '\, 43)`^^ /1 k (l t( fDpiia'c{ ji. (4-t z 7602 90 f&RIVX Tag 13 (134 .4764 .Z 7 9 Axis,, z - PO 9U g5t4 74,1��.'- �( � d i;Ail;0 t., 33/�r__9 111 = / 7. c.,,C): (' •^�' )75 �,01 - n(I-I�.l.l.@nv. 93/—(S`I-73 e.., 7;,,., (L. k., '.., -y L� l 4.;J 1 S1, _,Ly/...,,,- ,,,, `1 -s t/r'/]q / ',' • am ' I.-.�l t.''./ 7: C•(. .ly. �, ,t %r/°1 9.--W-i hl . •r • ICJ Home Mime %,,,_.11...I _.3)4,,,,f0-,,,-, 7Z2 6, GI SI-A-1.A..41_1.-fri--,. I L.,€.-,d t 1‘7-4-- /0.4;6— 7CC A- (15:17/e--•-•,;' 4-,--o--e---•-- Pol -(0.r.r„10 7C4/ .Gr.v.c 2P-e--,44-c =l/f, <t - C7% "766"7 s4Prei4t -7S-4971cce- GCliv 1>c:,. 7 L / ,_/c-a/2 r.,.ten ,"1.�.... aL J 4.016 '7(7 f cteAcm— .: MLL 2 ii 0.6- pli. 7( 7 Q d`il°Lot. .7roi.r !/ . ,i i 9 - 7(n0Z Derr WCX.n o�� % 1-7 ,- / 7(P( .11,t;)!AA. Gar- nn ✓vt' i r (`f"Y y hft/.ftL 7 f'21/�� f li t /,=,-e 41,:,/,;.r/l;-%,' 7G.,,/ _'I.74'„c-,, //'.,e- 71 -/.5/b . � �lz � �1..1' 7�c-t t n,?. r,-n R�t, f 9�'t ..77 ✓n,4..Q -x(e)?,-,.,, 7S3 1 Y).,,.At.t..:,,. , 93 7- /72 3 � ,���a,t-0 �.?T • w..,r,. ;! 4-9t,(.a•rr,.. /.4-4,-..'t I37-/72.3 1,11L-, /,.e. ,,1,1 75-a' o.-r:- ; i -," 9-37 53g. `'t'�'C"-.~1`i4i.D.f A _ 7� r� t!rJ�1^4 A 1—V 97,7`Y°1''S O �, 0 + r� ,t I tt �� 'r �l�. 7..,. �_ Lc. .9�J i0,.lz ir: �7 n�ii.� ,1�13Y'!-z. 41 '/ (1'f 1(),-.{e"c,). '1�,11 RI(tA0. I(31. q;',--Plf$ 0 n,) ki-^,tde DCt,1 95 0/ 91 IlluArk . q.31-pH: nn4-,47 ((•��r;rt•r.,.,.•, 7 (,t II(ere n, ♦tits• 9.37-,:,cr3 • Li ✓' . `fO( i . . • Nemc ,. Address • c, , ( .' I\ il. ' --1.' , ' r. -r • 4 L 76 2 I Sc. ee-• 7- , r e" tr .et1/ .091e ...: , . I/ 7 t.) (:, LI,(4.,;... 1`..c t_,•._. 4:7 , P /0495 5 igr,,,m, 1)r-• E,P. lacq-2, \-,c,,,,c,_,,-. CSC. E C• P • ...... .,-..,,..... ,.., • e, ,... ":"2„. . . ,i; ce., 7 ----t., ....'... .--- I IQ fr c....0 (Ala.', .2_,,\;,,,...-• /--- :..20 c‘y,1----7-(..„---4, ..-7, /-C-9:,-0. I d.;,./- )--t, II- ff•-.../ tij-4 3,) C14 1 71%Ai _5-9/t) bili44.h, a, (ap aeeLe-1.2__ is 7 cr.() teix...k•C7-. ).),t. ... /2. .1 fv/..._.) /10,,, 7s-D/ &es re*,,A.- r; C P p>° ' e ivi...._,-- -2f / k I 4,L /4 74 17`,' e 1 e AiNi ifiter---//— 7521 itt:07-66-ie 77z: , ‘.„ ,, e 1-k,,,L 7 .71 (1/4.t?;(4. -1 E.p. 1-kill1 76Y I I 6/17/ (..0-.12.iaLsa,e-..,_ .-", P, iel'ILL*- (1.'. laeli --17,,-.'‘ I I 1 6 Ct.I • ,---:?::-:f.e• 61.i' 1/I i r',.-1_,--1 4,(17 --T 1::i'.‹<-1.--fL-r il I,-f.4./.1,1;6).;.• II'fj?) P.415/.4-6 4 7,;:.,I / it 3 I tki rEsr61174- 7 1')i c ,_..........,.r. ., $ I I ' I/1i4 /c/ 7 f4, . . 4(47-.0c.4-e— /( ( /LA'S-Ifik . 1 . . Name ii,:i Address lz,,:il ,5-i 1,-0,--,4 tv-I e. 71) I f.....:,./....),, , )...... A-.;''I•t'r i ' . ‘.. T. , - , V,4---_ /(_;.t --) / (c: k'c;-`71;-,1c -77-I. (2); _ .„,-.7 Q-Cy •, ,,01:-.1 /4 ii i/ A hil_ J ....1/I//.7.7 P.1.4.•-• //I (-1.. .--/-41-• /e3.7e) - ctie,-Ze-,(7.; i-37-a-i-e' ,. ei...„ i LS•-kr;IA..,j_./,,, /6 3 7 0 - / 1. N'ili,L4.* Ill fle,A , 7 5 66 ...f..4_,-LeA,:, tal a-,,,e A 5i ea)e Le-e /w(sb Lii Li.s CAQ, f4tr,',Q,.., 14--e'lf--/ -e_ /,/G,VlO. . - . . , . . . . . 0 0 'b The Derrick Cormoro,s + 1650 Shelord Tower • Minneapolis.MN 55426 • 612/546-2276 13 September 1984 Honorable Mayor and Council CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Subject: Proposal for Assisted Apartments Dear Mayor and Council: We have been working closely with the City Staff for the last few months to develop a program to assist lower and very low income people (elderly and families) by developing a method of producing affordable rental housing. Our preliminary Proposal -for a 112 unit apartment development is a result of the last few month's work with the City Staff. This Proposal consists of two buildings (56 unit elderly and 56 unit family). We are respectfully requesting the City Council to approve the concept described in the proposal. If the concept is acceptable, we will then proceed to have the site plan reviewed by the Planning Commission and bring it to the City Council. We will also work out a formal agreement with your legal, planning and financial staff. All of these details will have to be approved by the City Council. We appreciate the assistance and dedication exhibited thus far and are looking forward to working with the Staff and Council in the future to produce this affordable housing development. • S nee ely, Richard C. Kricr, AICP Vice President Derrick Companies RCK:clb cc: Mark Jones, President Mark Jones & Associates i0 i }1 L i . a • 2 Y . I a PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS i 112 UNITS IN 0 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 6 0 1 1 0 a . • I i • fl By Derrick Companies • August, 1984 E 0 a 11 PROPOSAL Q Derrick Companies and Mark Jones 6 Associates propose to construct 112 apartments in two buildings. This housing will be constructed for very low income people. One building will be for elderly, very low income and the second building would be for non-elderly, very low income people. These Village Prairie Apartments will be three-story buildings with underground parking, surface parking, elevators, and storage area on a large landscaped lot. The development is part of the 6onyea Fourth Addition PUD and is designated for multi-family housing as part of the PUD. • Very low income housing means that the rents, including utilities must not exceed: One Bedroom $388.00 per month Two Bedroom $451.00 per month 0 Besides the rents being at this lower level, there are income limits placed on people renting the apartments. The income limits for these areduced rents would be as follows*: Very Low Family Size Income Limit One Person $11,500 Two Person $13,100 Three Person $14,750 Four Person $16,400 Both the rents and the income would be adjusted annually for inflation. People who did not qualify within these income limits would not be provided with any assistance but would pay market rate for the apartments. The apartment's 1985 Market rate rents would be: One Bedroom Small $462.00/mo. Q One Bedroom Large $490.00/mo. One Bedroom/Den $536.00/mo. Two Bedroom $561.00/mo. *Subject to annual adjustment by U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development effective May 11, 1984, for Hennepin County. A Lid II 0 8 Income is qualified on an annual basis based on tax returns and other • available current data (from employers, assistance payments, Social Security, etc.). As a general rule, people should be able to afford 11 30% of their income for housing expense. This 30% includes the cost of taxes, utilities, mortgage or rent and association fee, if any. Of course, in our proposal the 30% would be to cover rent and utilities 0 only. As an example of income to what people can afford, I have provided the following comparison. 8 1. Social Security Payment = $450 - $500 per month x 30% .. $150 per month of affordable rent. Source: Area office Social Security Administration B2. Employed Persons 16 years and older, a median wage scale in the Eden Prairie area would be comparable as follows: 9 Occupation Annual Income Rent II Managerial $21,000 $525/mo. Sales/Support $16,000 $400/mo. Service $ 9,000 $225/mo. . Farming $18,000 $450/mo. a Production/Repair $16,000 $400/mo. Operator/Laborer $ 9,000 $225/mo. Source: 1980 Census adjusted by CPI for 1980, 81, 82, 83, 84 Note: This income by occupation is rounded to the nearest $1,000 0 So, as demonstrated above, the housing would be affordable for people who presently live in Eden Prairie and are receiving Social Security (elderly) and those income producers, who are productively employed fl and currently residing in Eden Prairie. Of course, all housing is equal opportunity, and other non-residents and those receiving other assistance payments would also be housed in the proposed development. 0 The point is there is a need for affordable housing in the community { for employed and elderly people who presently reside in Eden Prairie. LOCATION The proposed apartment buildings will be located at U. S. Highway 5 and County Road 4. This northeast quadrant location is well suited for elderly and multi-family housing for the following reasons: r 1. Closeness to the Prairie Village shopping center with drug store and grocery store. 2. Closeness to medical offices, library, schools, new bank and rchurches. 3. On a public transportation route. 11 c14 2 0 0 • • • 4. Adjacent to large open space. • 5. Across the street from a major employment center, Birchwood industrial area, so people who are employed there or will be employed there, and in other employment areas, will have the opportunity of housing near their place of employment. The.location is also in the middle of an area which presently contains approximately 3,000 elderly households*, and which in ten years will contain more elderly households. This gives the opportunity for elderly people, who live in the area, to continue to enjoy their neighborhood. WHY THIS HOUSING IS BEING PROPOSED Although several lower income housing developments have been built in Eden Prairie, the latest a 63 unit 202 elderly project near this location (Edendale), there is a continuing need to provide additional housing. This continuing need is similar to others- in nearby communities. The 1980 census of population indicated that • nearly 1,800 households in these lower income group presently live in Eden Prairie. In addition, assuming the 202 elderly project satisfied part of this need, 100 units would still be marketable for the proposed housing. HOW TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO VERY LOW INCOME We have developed financing methods whereby these housing needs can be partially satisfied. These financing methods use presently available tools which when used in combination, can produce very low income housing. These financing methods can be used without risk to the City and with the subsidy being paid back by us so it can be used again. aThe Metropolitan Council Allocation Plan indicates a need for 760-1900 very low income homes in Eden Prairie by 1990. Of this, 40% are n expected to be elderly, very low income. Forty percent (40%) of the ildl very low income, less the 202 Project, is 304 housing units or 48 units per year. This proposal satisfies part of the continuing need for very low income housing. • a *Part of Edina, part of Minnetonka, all of Eden Prairie • a 0 0 a n, The financing methods work as follows: We would use Housing Revenue Bonds to finance the construction and provide a permanent mortgage. Housing Revenue Bonds are similar to Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, which Eden 0 Prairie has used previously, except they are outside the cap limits imposed in the recent Congressional Session. We would prepare a housing plan and program as required by State Law. The g housing plan would be the same as the plan contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The housing program would describe our proposed 112 unit apartment development. The Planning 0 Commission and the City Council will review and approve the housing plan and program after a public hearing. The housing plan and program must also be approved by the Metropolitan Council and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The Housing Plans 0 and Programs approvals by the Metropolitan Council and MHFA is a matter of course. The City Council would also approve the Housing Revenue Bonds. We, of course, would prepare all the II documentation for review by your legal, financial and planning staff. rt The Housing Revenue Bonds for financing will allow us to provide apartments with the following rents: It ■■ One Bedroom Small $462.00/mo. 0 One Bedroom Large $490.00/mo. One Bedroom/Den $536.00/mo. Two Bedroom $561.00/mo. . USee Aattached Summary Proforma n This is moderate income rent and not very low income rent. To reduce ti the rents to low income rents, we would use Tax Increment Financing tl (TIF) and Community Development Block Grant money (CDBG). We would only use TIF and CDBG for very low income qualified people. This (I. would allow us to reduce the rents to: One Bedroom $388.00/mo. aTwo Bedroom $451.00/mo. These are Fair Market Rents (FMR) for very low income people These very low income qualified people would be provided with federal assistance to further reduce the rents. The Federal Section 8 Lease Existing Program would be used (Eden Prairie is presently participating in this program). We must reduce rents to Fair Market fl Rents (FMR), or the federal assistance program would not be available to serve the very low income group. 0 C hilt{ 0 0 One Hundred and Twenty-nine Thousand Dollars ($129,000) of CDBG money would be used and Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000) of TIF would be used to reduce the rents. The TIF would be used at a rate of $100,000 per year for eight years. It appears it would be possible to provide assistance to 56-64 units per year at this funding level. The TIF would actually be used to provide an interest reduction payment for those apartment units occupied by lower and very low income people. This interest reduction payment would be passed on directly to reduce the rents. The City would not sell Tax Increment Bonds but use'the TIF as it becomes available.This eliminates any risk the City would have associated with using TIF Bonds, and it also uses more of the TIF for rent assistance than if TIF Bonds were issued because there would be no TIF money used for capitalized interest, bond 11 discount or issuance costs. This can amount up to 18% of a normal TIF Bond issue. The Tax Increment used for the rent assistance will come only from these two apartment buildings. The CDBG money would be used 11 for two years before Tax Increment was available from the two apartment buildings, and the Tax Increment would be used for eight years. If possible, both CDBG money and Tax Increment would be repaid by us. If possible, we would repay both when the apartment development is . sold. The apartment buildings would be sold in approximately ten years. When the development is sold, a first payment would be made to the City to recapture the entire CDBG funds and Tax Increment funds. We would want to repay the funds when the development is sold, because 11 that is when we, as developer, would make a profit on the development. We would prepare at no cost to the City, the Housing Tax Increment Plan for review by your legal, financial and planning staff. We have prepared four similar plans for a number of cities in Minnesota. BENEFITS It is a lot of additional work and some additional cost to produce and manage lower and very low income housing. Also, we can produce a feasible development using only the Housing Revenue Bonds without using TIF or CDBG. The benefits to us are twofold: 1. Because of the large number of people in the very low income group, there is a large market demand for affordable housing. This means that we will probably rent the units sooner and experience a somewhat greater occupancy rate. 11 2. Most other apartments in Eden Prairie have rents much higher than is generally acceptable to very low income people, so by providing rent assistance our project becomes more competitive. a a 0 0 { 0 These benefits, although limited, make the additional costs and 3 management problems worth the effort to provide lower and low income housing. The benefits to the City are: 1. Satisfy a need for affordable housing which presently exists; a need which Eden Prairie residents have now.11 2. Help accomplish the Eden Prairie's housing goals as contained in the Comprehensive Plan. I i 1 a U a it U p gap a 0 • 0 a • ilQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS In anticipation of your questions, I have tried to provide you with a i number of answers. 1. What type of people will live here? II The two buildings will be hetrogenous by building. One building will be for elderly and one building will be for families and individuals. Both buildings will provide housing for market rate, lower, and the city's assisted very low income renters. This hetrogenous approach allows us to duplicate the neighborhoods the people are from. Mixing incomes also provides 11 us with a more stable development. 2. Where will the people cone from? fl The elderly will probably come from within two to five miles of the development. The families will be people who are employed in the area or have relatives and/or friends in the area. if3. How will people be helped? The City will reduce the rents to levels acceptable for the II Section 8 assistance. The very low income people involved will then apply for Section 8 assistance and upon approval rent one of the housing units where the City has reduced rent. 4. flow will the City be paid back? 11 This will be accomplished in two ways. First, by providing housing which is needed in the community and second, by the developer for funds accrually expended. If possible, the City would be repaid for the funds expended when the development is 19 sold. The developer's profit is also taken when the development is sold. The details of the repayment will be worked out in the formal agreement. II5. How will the development be financed? 0 We will use Housing Revenue Bonds to finance this development. This is the same type of financing currently being used by other developers in Eden Prairie. P6. When would the development be completed? We would begin construction next spring and be ready for opening 0 in the fall of 1985. However, it is important that we sell Housing Revenue Bonds before the first of the year. This is necessary so we can obtain a favorable interest rate. Ll i') 0 4 • 7. ghat are the steps necessary to accomplish this development? 1. Concept approval by the City Council September 18. 2. Recommendation on rezoning, site plan by Planning Commission. 3. Approval of rezoning and site plan by City Council. 4. Preparation of Housing Program, Housing Tax Increment District by developer for review by City Staff and Planning Commission and adaptation by City Council. • Er- I I Q 1 • f►r fl 0 • PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS PRELIMINARY PROFORMA SUMMARY U COSTS Q Estimated Development Cost $5,158,806 Initial Operative Cost 112,334 Total Cost.of Production $5,271,140 t ! Funding dui Housing Revenue Bonds $4,264,719 Equity 1,006,421 Total Cost of Funding $5,271,140 Rents Necessary for Debt Service $460,625/year Return on investment 13.5% Interst Rate of Return (after tax) 25.0% U Q E I p I Ll I�� II 0 0 ' O. { '+ PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS t Demdl Development Corpaeeon 5 Mark Jones Assoc.Inc. .t C i I g (.-....1_,, . fv, I t-) e- ii ,‘ \ �- ‘ \ - , „I„ v 1 \e ��r . • •, \1 ,\\ liEd 1 Asti= " N . ..: '''' '\ ' t' ,>%'''‘. .' 4 \\ \ . s `` + \! IYrI _ .h\,:`,\ ' V1:- , t„, \,, ,;- \ -- Q t1 \, \ \� sit �; �'111 ` • 1 - it • \\\ ' � I.+ I 1 1,\‘‘ ‘ ,\1 I` \\% El i ,,,, \ $.,.....,- ‘ s. ,,..-- ,„,i) , ru \ \ \\\l� Is `x� • (`\ 11 YYY 1 fi . L1AO . • I % 9—r----') 4r, .—.,••• I I — :I : -:1:1 4 til ei.....- .t 4 •• -• 0 1•40 ;• 4444, A.74,,....._ • • . tf's.k.- ! . " .."; ' • . • • '.• .1 • 'CID : . / •••••• t•r•In. .• (r) , Location Map M c .. 1• )11 I] i CM 1 ' • •••• N, lo.t ! : •1;‘,1 . ediin • ... 1 r-tioe•••/ I I . i 94 61 '• ...; '......... Laeke Ilil • V I . .•"b. • 4110.:' ' .;'I 5() * "•1' j s.66.c.i:t:"' 1- "*"..".° ' '4 I . . ' ' ' '' '''••••• ' o a i• /1 %. tr , .F......7.„....„,..., ,,,,„ . .:,,,:..., ,, ,5: al.. 7'r • •••• .^ .41:44 . -•4-,---,.„,•- : •I`t':. , 5irn ., i . . t.. '. , \"*.- i . .• .;t:'3.1W:\%.__Q) ..,„_,.._ \'' r '..... ..,....• 0 i. ' (r) . Or-- - 4 . ":!,:..tH 1---fp ,._• • •••••.. i iL-.: \.. ‘ ( t• ] I /ill ••r., .,1_ ...• ir- k • •.,/ (.1./:-./. . , . . •_-..L.,.,_ ,_05_2 .,-.. . tEl .-.4.=•,..1;- 0 Wayzatt ".' 'N ',74, •' \'' (-5: 'IX.' 4\'r I I 1 I 1. . ' •P1', .•-•' : ....___,....• ' 40-- : . .', .! ilt• 1 " pt.-LOUIS ,•••._ ___,,_.,,,.../;•-• ,,,:,1:". }.,,: . , 4 •' ••tt ,,,''Park,... 0 ",,;:ii-,. i ...,: ,.- . 'NA/. ,...,:,:1-1,,,,I '' •.'" . 11111 0 IL-;.,:7 °F11r1 I (1) • ' ait 2- ..-- ... .; .... -: 0 g Iteb4.6ono. 't iii , , 1 0,61.t. -' / t gris„:„... ... ...,. , Wall a., ' .,, 1 -L-6\ - )4.- 0'*".... lap ED----„ )iiir,__ ops,•: I ' ' -'.....,( — : ffl — --1 1 • ,.r.1,„,t,.- i 1: 11 ,..... ' ---a Mr. .."--., ... I-... Ell!.........., I it 001111Promi;75.6111,. ..: ,A 10, Eil. ; ey'•": {:e,esshaven,--"" ..,, , ....„.....lic,,,.. t.,,:;,,,, ,2 •....,.., _ ill : hi 01 .11.4o. '1 • Er 4-.. ,.....-.: • 0 . I i t..i, 1 i AI1 . .-.-- ' saw Min etonkall .,,,„;. 1., i ',.. • 1 ..... - i ..... ; ;',...rp(k. . I •••••••/c.1.:-1 r'T-1 rd ,. , A \ ''' ,1 -1E:Jira— 'It °141414 ,....„. ,,,., .. ..,•., .. ___.. ,6 i• , /.• _— — ii.....Aou.. , r I.,^1•••‘* : I ., •... 6 ,..0'1•- ,... "....••• I' ' — PRAIRIE PRAIRIE VILLAGE • " ':;:"e' / • ,...:t%P .• - • ', ‘'' 1"11 '-:,- ...,21 ,, ., / o.CD 1 '.-, ' 4-•,0. z. . si,-„,-• '..,4 APARTMENTS - , 17 ••I . ' 1 II" ! i '. I • a - A 1 , ,' '-;-V . -.• .: :-.i. •••., 'I• ,', Y--.. ...'''' '-.,,,„' C) , 0' .:‘,.'..:.,..--tu: •', `-`E°1;. i I ; •ir.t.:::,!, !,*-- ' c%-fi 3.:*i: //`--.''z'' -- Y'"---.;•7'. ,-T !'''..? :1" ' — ..;.:—..i '' ''' " 4:1b1---- - d7._—.-„s:..\ ...' •• 5 - 4 ,-n v2lia-,,,,,.,... ' '''..... • ' _____ ,..... en...Rrair le T ..... ''' 4—,. t.,. /N6r..;.:,,,. ..:;JTrel.4•611 Or"▪ '.1.,.2.—... 1 1, wsi'‘ ;. *I il•_-.....:;SI','.:'::.,:,.., .‘-r I ./ c•-'-'7,1„. 1, i ...• '"4, ilt N'.:,.." ._N :.,— ,—._.,,_, r !fc,•::....,,..,.. . ., • ‘ EDEN PRAIRIE • : \,..... . \-. . ,...... fl' \.::Z(77 ., V e'g 0 .,...:r-- ' 1 ,{ • -- 0 , SHOPPING CENTER -, : ;N..,- ,,, :,..`•:::;,„! „1••- _ ._ : ''•\••• ..._:.,..,..: . -:,-;, L....7 ' • ...‘ ' •ii ,Bloomington : . : 1 :p....:. ....2. 1 ; 4 ....,.. ,,'O..,naoll • '.4.41,.....11--L—: • ,• . ;. •• .4 t• VZ,,, :j . 0 ' 1 I. . ...to:. .i. ' 1. " • : , i 1 \'‘•••., 7 ' ,4340 1 '''S..j I ?' •• I, 1 I ''', 1 - ...-. i ••••...• s.- - .... ( ....." ' I .r:-:'......„‘:,,,,),,„. ,-- r`n:.. ,. ./'....":\: ,.).. i......,...........• • 1 ,i7i ,, ' ,.., .... .,"..,"'. -‘ "L.7 t .:1',. /•• f.\ ' • ! 11)1 15.\ '...-...,, . — •••••"1€10)•• • i ....., -.i i t_ ';':::-.7'...;-"•%•-:.'' 77--••"7-k• , :. \\ I --1* .. -.., ' ' 1-3';-----1, '.-... 1`' ,--,• ..-- ' A ! ...- ' ; • •••••••• •*: MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bop Lambert, Director of Community Services�E ' DATE: January 31, 1985 SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report to January 11, 1985 Planning Staff Report on Prairie Village Apartments • Derrick Land Company is applying for a Comprehensive Guide Plan change from office and medium density residential to high density residential, PUD concept amendment for 6.6 acres, zoning district change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 6.6 acres and pre- liminary plat of 14.9 acres into one lot and two outlots. The major considerations for the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission are: 1. Access to recreation facilities. 2. Preservation of the existing pond and shoreland. 3. Proposed landscaping. 4. Pedestrian and bicycle connection to existing trails and recreation facilities. The previously approved plan proposed a 20,000 sq. ft. office and a 40 unit elderly building on this site. This development proposes two 56 unit apartment buildings, one to serve the elderly. ACCESS TO RECREATION FACILITIES This site is located approximately one-eighth of a mile from Round Lake Community Park and is adjacent to approximately 9 acres of City owned open space to the east that does have some recreation development potential. The Community Services Depart- ment does not feel any on-site recreation facilities are necessary for this develop- ment, as long as satisfactory provisions are made for bicycle and pedestrian access to adjacent existing facilities and open space. PRESERVATION OF POND AND SHORELAND The January 11th Planning Staff Report refers to the 180 foot setback from the wet- land area and the proposed grading plan for this site. The majority of the grading has been completed and some additional berminn is proposed along the edge of the wetland to provide a transition to the maintained area on the site. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING Landscaping of this site will he critical due to the building mass proposed directly adjacent to single family homes. Community Services staff concur with the Planning Staff Report requiring berms around the east end of thr easterly most building that would screen the first level, as well as a heavy landscape treatment with a minimum of 6' coniferous trees and 2';" caliper minimum size for shade trees. The Planning , Staff Report also suggests a minimum height of 10' for the coniferous trees between the multi-family and single family areas and that some 5" caliper overstory trees be introduced into the landscape plan along the wetland area. y1� Prairie Village Apartments -2- January 31, 1985 PEDESTRIAN BICYCLE TRAIL CONNECTIONS The January 11th Planning Staff Report refers to a proposal for a 5' concrete sidewalk along.the south side of Wagner Way. The Community Services department would expand that recommendation, and would recommend the following trails system serve this development: 1. A 5' concrete sidewalk should be constructed on both sides of Wagner Way, as this sidewalk will serve pedestrian access to the restaurant area at the corner of 4 and 5, as well as to the shopping area on the west side of County Road 4, for not only the residents on the south side of Wagner Way but also for the office employees on the north side of the road. 2. A 5' concrete sidewalk should also extend between the two buildings from the sidewalk alone Wanner Way, southeast to the trail location along the pond edge. Future consideration should also be made for a sidewalk connection between the proposed restaurants to the east from Wanner Way to this trail location along the pond. 3. The trail along the pond is proposed to be an 8' asphalt trail that would extend from the restaurant area, northeast alona the pond; then easterly to the City park property on the east border of this site. The Community Services staff would recommend that the developer be required to grade the trail location and install the base material of Class V, 10' wide and 6" deep, when the streets are constructed. The trail must be level and located a minimum of 2' above the normal ordi- • inary high water mark of the adjacent pond. It should extend from the City property's west border (this property's east border) westerly to the Senior housing apartment complex's west border (see attached map). The Community Services Department recommends approval of the Prairie Village Apartments proposal as per the Planning Staff Report and the additional recommenda- tions sited in this report. BL:md • i • `.-n �.e.• w. ( d �?QIl •i. .11^ I i:.:h' \' N i c:r 1 c• - i: • ::! v • - 1 I , `� C % 1 = • ' IiNo Yi: '\ ( .. °t ;.)4: a. • � -• s i • • % ^ 41 J \ 1�. i1 • 1 _ ;� R �. .� d : W • ` I-2v° w _f� ,' ,:11 j 1 • a31.:. I. +aois3dfls• :r. +` t .1 ,_, • 'v _ v r N n 1 r.i`v r l', \. • •1 \.''1- {/',.a '. ':• 3 . -. .:. : e- ... :e .1'.... ..i/ ' -.--- , .----- I X:....‘s.:62 ij•-.42/ Ir., 1 IN 1 3 y 't'c —i ��\. • •► . ` .—I • S\ �j << 11.1.(.•':. ''.('}�i\1 \' ` I 1 11 • J—.. i . ' n(I i 1:11,'-:-.••••\ '.0 c,' ' ,.. '.1 i ; !!, g tv \+c \ . 1 • I�: I t 0 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: January 11, 1985 i SUBJECT: Prairie Village Apartments LOCATIDN: Northeast quadrant of Highway #5 and County Road #4 APPLICANT: Derrick Land Company FEE OWNER: Gonyea Land REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential and Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment for 6.6 acres; • 2. Planned Unit Development's District Review of 37.19 acres, with variances; 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 6.6 acres; and, 4. Preliminary Plat of 14.9 acres into one lot and two outlots. Background r ,t _(_l Tfi"T 1 f _. 8"!r, ,rr .r�;;- ' , I • ice_..;,..-: This site is part of a 37-acre rt3 pli!? 7. - F 1+�'- •, [ <L•t a.-, ,. Planned Unit Development previously -221 � I---• .�,-t�----1 1 f_!.�., •�- reviewed by the Planning Commission i +,.;, f;._-j,�,j_ I' -i - . } i.�. '-' in February, 1984. The development rr.1. rF-i2 _ -- •�-� -, ,r included 31 single family lots, a 'S 17r`,it- y {'lt, 40-unit elderly building, two sit- c`,., ; ` \\ down restaurants, and 70,D00 sq. ft. .'•' t— r -- "•---•'- 'A�:'•`y,•��1 of office usage on three separate t —�`, 8-0 J�-'-r3 ! 1,, \ '� sites. Plans also included an .'..�.._.•c•_ JI '\ \, \.y:- ` �\ \t !x.<;;:, sidered h the Department of Natural -{ -� _ r` '.'_ Resources to be "public waters." —1 e.\ 15,; „ • b_.1- f The request of the proponent can be ;:•! E;".'' :�'t:"k;5 � '" mil �Z r� .�. � � ,. broken down into two categories: =-`- — - i K. + ^ , The first issue involves a Comore- • , ,, - ,. ,,� , f• -i-•:i '� ..; hensive Guide Plan change, from Pf?Cli'OQLf) �17C 1'< ,'� Office and Medium Density Res- • I •. ./i III I I ) -�) ��/� .� ,� \ idential uses to High Density '�'; `+- /{G -s'l-:..' „.,„. , ,_, ,,. ri,„......,..:._ r , �.r :r: LO f ti K)N MAP 0 0 Prairie Village Apartments 2 January 11, 1985 Residential, 25% of which will be targeted for low and moderate income elderly people. The elderly building will require a participation by the City with Housing Revenue Bonds, Tax Increment Financing, and Community Development Block Grant funds. The second issue involves a specific request for rezoning and platting, evaluating architecture, site planning, grading, and landscaping. Comprehensive Guide Plan/Concept Plan Change The concept plan involves a change from 2D,000 sq. ft.- of office and a 4D-unit elderly building to two, 56-unit apartment buildings. The proponent's narrative indicates seven reasons why the Comprehensive Guide Plan should be changed. Site Plan The site plan involves the construction of two multiple family buildings on approximately 6.6 acres of land. The west site will be set aside for elderly units and the east site will be set aside for multiple family units. Each building will contain 56 units. There are 112 total parking spaces provided underground, with 56 exterior spaces provided to meet Code requirements for the family building. 14 on- grade parking spaces are provided for the elderly building. The proponent is asking for a variance because a good portion of the elderly residents will not have vehicles, or second vehicles. The proponent is providing for 42 spaces for future parking, should the elderly building be converted to a traditional multiple family building in the future. The proponent is also asking for a five-foot variance from the front yard setback requirement to parking. If berming and proposed landscaping can effectively screen the parking areas, then perhaps the request for this variance may be warranted. Access to this site will by two driveways off proposed Wagner Way. Wagner Way is shown with 50 ft. of right-of-way with a 28-ft. road surface. For pedestrian access, proponents should include a five-ft. concrete sidewalk on the south side of Wagner Way. Provisions of the Shoreland Management Ordinance do not apply, since the wetland area is not ten acres in size, or greater. If Shoreland regulations did apply, there would be a requirement for a 150-ft. building setback from the high water mark. The buildings are setback at a minimum distance of 180 ft. from the wetland area. Grading The existing topography indicates that the site slopes in a northerly to southerly direction, from a high point of elevation 880 in the northeast corner of the site, to a low point of elevation 857 at the edge of the wetland. A minimal amount of site grading will occur, since much of the site was previously graded as part of the approved grading plan for the entire Gonyea 4th Addition Planned Unit Development. A four-foot high berm is provided along Wagner Way to screen the parking areas. At some points, the herm height is only two feet above the parking area, and in these situations, additional plantings will be necessary. As a visual transition to the adjoining single family lots, a berm of approximately six to eight feet in height is proposed. This berm should be extended further around the east side of the • building. Berming, alone, will not provide an effective transition between the d,6 0 Prairie Village Apartments 3 January 11, 1985 • single family and multiple family areas and will need to be supplemented heavily with additional landscaping. Some berming is proposed along the edge of the wetland to provide transition and to break up the view of the building mass from Highway #5. In the sight section and elevation view, ten-foot high berms seem relatively insignificant compared to a building with a maximum height of 45 ft. These berms should be heavily landscaped. Stormwater run-off is proposed to sheet drain across the parking areas into catch basins. From that point, water will flow from a 12-inch storm sewer pipe into the wetland area. The proponent should provide details of the outlet structure for review by the City Engineer. The outlet structure should be designed to blend into the natural landscape and to minimize erosion to the greatest extent possible. • Landscaping/Screening The Design Framework Manual for the Gonyea 4th Addition Planned Unit Development indicated an overall landscape plan with a list of acceptable plant materials and sizes. This included a six-foot minimum height for coniferous trees, 21i-inch caliper minimum size for shade trees, and a three-foot minimum height for shrubs. The mass landscape plan also identified a need to introduce larger trees of over five inches in caliper into the plan to create a mature look to the development and to provide for a transitional planting of indigenous plant materials along the edge of the wetland area. The proposed berming, to serve as a transition between the multiple family units and adjacent single family areas, will need additional coniferous trees to provide a more effective screening year-round. The height of these coniferous trees should be a minimum of ten feet to provide more effective screening at the time of planting. The landscape plan should be revised to provide more detailed information relative to specific tree types and tree sizes. This plan should also include an area of indigenous plant material transition along the edge of the wetland, which might include dogwood, elm, aspen, and other lowland varieties. The berm along Wagner Way will not screen parking areas and should be supplemented with coniferous material. Architecture Preliminary building elevations indicate a three-story building with a pitched roof. Primary building materials are face brick, wood siding, and asphalt shingles. Since these buildings will be highly visible from Highway #5 and the adjoining future single family homes, the buildings should be of the highest quality and reflect a residential scale. Residential scale can mean a number of different things, but, generally speaking, it would mean having characteristics of a single family home. This may include detailing of the building elevations, especially around the ( windows, a breaking up of the building mass by building projections, staggered roof lines, a pitched roof, and a variety of exterior materials that are related architecturally. One way to achieve residential character would be to change the form of the roof line of the buildings to decrease the overall height visually. An example of this would he the Castieridge Retirement Home on Prairie Center Drive and Highway #169. Though the building is four stories high, an extension of the roof line across the • upper level of the units makes the building appear as a three-story building. Using iJ;') 0 Q Prairie Village Apartments 4 January 11, 1985 this concept in a similar manner, may help the building appear as two-story. In addition, more detailing around the windows and doorways, and different textured patterns of brick and wood, would provide more architectural relief to the building. Primary building materials are face brick and wood. The Staff estimate would be that 40-45% of the building would be of wood materials. This would require a variance from the Code requirement which states that primary building materials shall be brick, stone, or glass. Staff would recommend that the amount of wood utilized for the structures be limited to 25% of the exterior face of any one wall. This would be consistent with Code, which would allow wood to be used as an accent material, not to exceed 25% of the face of any wall. Conclusions Multiple family housing in this location could be considered a compatible use, since the future tenants of the building would be in close proximity to public transportation, medical services, shopping fac ilities, and eating establishments. Land use compatibility also involves the relationship to adjoining land uses. Primarily from a visual standpoint, land use transition is important to offset any potential negative impacts which may occur. Changes in the form of the building, to create a more residential scale, and more detailing to the building, supplemented • with additional and larger plant materials, should help create a visual transition. Though there would be a net increase in traffic over the original Concept Plan, Staff feels that the increase will be somewhat less, since 50% of the people will be elderly and may not have their own transportation. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission may choose to recommend any of the following courses of action: 1. The Commission could recommend approval of the request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential of 6.6 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances, of 37.9 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 6.6 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 14.59 acres into two lots and one outlot, based on plans dated December 5, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985, including the following conditions: A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. Modify the building plans as suggested in this report. 2. Modify the building plans to reflect a 25% application of wood as a building material. 3. Modify the landscape plan to provide for additional buffering and screening adjacent to single family residential uses and to provide lowland plant materials to create a transition to the wetland area. 4. Modify the site plan to include a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Wagner Way. !��_t 0 0 • Prairie village Apartments 5 January 11, 1985 B. Prior to final plat, proponent shall provide detailed stormwater • run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District and City Engineer. C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: • 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 3. Submit an overall lighting plan, with details, for review. 4. Provide an overall signage plan, with details, for review; or, 2. The Commission could recommend approval of the plans as submitted by the developer; or, 3. The Commission could recommend returning the plans to the developer for revision according to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985; or, 4. The Commission could recommend denial of the plans. Planning Commission Minutes 4 . January 14, 1985 • • D. PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS, by Derrick Land Company. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential for 6.61 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances, on approximately 40 • acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 6.61 acres; • Preliminary Plat of 14.25 acres into two lots and one outlot for two, 56-unit apartment buildings. A public hearing. Planner Enger reviewed the history of the development proposals in this area and, specifically, the City's approval in 1980 of a Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for mixed land uses, including single family, multiple family, elderly housing, office, and retail uses. He added that the City had adopted a policy to help elderly housing develop in the comnunity through • Community Development Block Grant funding, as well. Chairman Bearman asked if approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept required upgrading of the Highway #5, County Road #4 intersection prior to development. Planner Enger stated that the requirement was for none of the commercial development to take place prior to the upgrading of that intersection. He added that the State and County planned to have the intersection upgrading underway by early 1986. • Chairman Bearman asked about the location of a median break in County Road #4 to match up with the property to the west, the shopping center. Planner Enger responded that the median break would probably take place across from the south entrance to the shopping center, at Main Street. Chairman Bearman asked if placing the median break at the north shopping center entrance had been considered. Planner Enger stated that it had been considered but that 4 an acceptable alternative was not available. He added that the median break at the shopping center's south entrance matched up with the entrance to the proposed development at Wagner Way. c J Planning Commission Minutes 5 January 14, 1985 Mr. Richard Krier, Derrick Land Co., proponent, reviewed the proposed development with the Commission. He explained that 25% of the project was proposed for subsidized housing for elderly residents, or 28 units of the 112 units proposed. The units would be split into two 56-unit structures with elderly residents in one structure and families able to rent in the other structure. Mr. Krier stated that the reasons for choosing this site for elderly housing development included the proximity of the site to shopping, medical facilities, churches, public transportation, and public facilities. Mr. Will Montgomery, architect for proponent, reviewed the site plan and elevation features with the Commission. Johannes stated that he was concerned about the compatibility of the elderly structure with the family structure. Mr. Krier stated that it was undesirable to segregate the elderly residents from other people, therefore, proponents felt the combination of the uses was compatible. Johannes asked why the parking spaces provided for the elderly building was less than the family building. Mr. Krier explained that it had been shown by their studies that elderly residents seldom had as many cars as younger families. He stated that "proof of parking" had been provided for the elderly portion of the project should the need for additional off-street parking become evident in the future. The amount of underground parking was the same as for the family building, however. Hallett asked if it would be possible to connect the project to the public trails and walkways of the area. Mr. Krier stated that this could be accomplished. He added that there were plans to include a picnic area, or benches near the ponding area and that an internal system could be connected to this private recreation area. Schuck expressed concern for the safety of the elderly and family residents in crossing of County Road #4, or Highway #5. He stated that the only location which could be considered safe would be at the semi-four at the intersection of County Road #4 and Highway #5. Staff stated that they would be exploring the possibility of a Pedestrian Demand Activated Signal in this area with the upgrading of the intersection in 1986. Chairman Bearman stated that he felt the project approval should be based on a requirement for provision of a safe pedestrian crossing. Gartner asked if the units would be accessible for handicapped people. Mr. Krier responded that they would be. Gartner stated that she felt it would be a better idea to move the driveway to the west of its current location. Chairman Bearman asked what methods the City had used in the past to buffer single family residential areas from multiple family areas. Planner Enger responded that often the multiple residential units would be built first in order that future single family residents would be aware of the presence of the multiple structure. In addition, site features, such as berming and buffering were used to screen the different uses from each other. Planner Enger pointed out that the developer had shown a buffer area on the landscape plan for this purpose. (.J.2)1 Planning Commission Minutes 6 January 14, 1985 (Schuck left the meeting at 11:00 p.m.) Chairman Bearman commented that he felt the design framework manual for the project should have the language "tightened," for example, changing the word "should" to "will." He added that he was concerned about safe access to the shopping center. Mr. Ray Ruuska, 7660 Superior Terrace, stated that the plans for this property had changed over the years. He expressed concern regarding the view of the rooftops of the structures, amount of parking spaces provided, . potential traffic problems at the County Road #4 and Highway #5, the safety of the proposed location for the median cut in County Road #4, the potential of Hennepin County taking over Highway #5 in this area which would possibly mean loss of funding for the improvement of that portion of the intersection, the burden of additional families on the school system, and the request for tax increment financing on this project. Mr. Leo W. Burton, 7662 Superior Terrace, expressed concern for the current traffic delays present at the south exit of the shopping center to the west. He also was concerned regarding potential conversion of the elderly building to family housing at some time in the future, maintenance of the exterior of the buildings, whether the construction of the multiple housing would cause less expensive housing to be built to the north in the single family portion of the Planned Unit Development, and the timing of the improvements to the intersection of County Road #4 and Highway #5. Mr. Doug Rueter, 8750 Black Maple Drive, indicated that he felt the density of the project was too high in such close proximity to single family residential units. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office and Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential for 6.61 acres for two apartment buildings, based on plans dated December 5, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985, and subject to the following added conditions: A. A safe pedestrian access be established for crossing of County Road #4. B. Internal circulation pathways be established, with a picnic, or sitting area, within the project for the benefit of both structures. C. A method be established make certain that the structure would remain as an elderly structure, not convert to family housing, for a period Planning Commission Minutes 7 January 14, .1985 of at least ten years. • D. Exploration of the potential for• connection of the internal circulation system to the public pedestrian circulation system in the Bittersweet Drive area. E. The driveway for the family structure be relocated to the southwest corner of the lot. F. The design framework manual be amended to include stronger language requiring the type of improvements listed. Motion carried--4-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Planned Unit Development District Review, with variances, and Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 for 6.61 acres for two apartment buildings, based on plans dated December 5, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985, and subject to the following added conditions: • A. A safe pedestrian access be established for crossing of County Road #4. B. Internal circulation pathways be established, with a picnic, or sitting area, within the project for the benefit of both structures. C. A method be established make certain that the structure would remain as an elderly structure, not convert to family housing, for a period of at least ten years. D. Exploration of the potential for connection of the internal circulation system to the public pedestrian circulation system in the Bittersweet Drive area. E. The driveway for the family structure be relocated to the southwest corner of the lot. F. The design framework manual be amended to include stronger language requiring the type of improvements listed. Motion carried--4-0-0 MOTION 4: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Derrick Land Company for Preliminary Plat of 14.25 acres into two lots and one outlot for two apartment buildings, based on plans dated December 5, 1934, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1935, and subject to the following added conditions: • • Planning Commission Minutes 8 January 14, 1985 A. A safe pedestrian access be established for crossing of County Road • #4. B. Internal circulation pathways be established, with a picnic, or 1 sitting area, within the project for the benefit of both structures. C. A method'be established make certain that the structure would remain as an elderly structure, not convert to family housing, for a period of at least ten years. D. Exploration of the potential for connection of the internal circulation system to the public pedestrian circulation system in . the Bittersweet Drive area. E. The driveway for the family structure be relocated to the southwest 1 corner of the lot. • F. The design framework manual be amended to include stronger language requiring the type of improvements listed. Motion carried--4-0-0 • • I • • • Project: Eden Prairie Community Library Owner: Hennepin County Location: Southwest Quadrant • Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard Eden Prairie, MN. • Date: December 11, 1984, revised December 26, 1984 fi Subject: Supportive material Site Man Review 1. Existing Land Use: Public 2. City Guide Plan Framework: Public - 3. Zoning Classification and/or Variances Requested: Public, no variances requested 4. Phasing and Construction Schedule: The project is currently in the Construction Document Phase with phase completion estimated at 70%.• We anticipate the Bidding Phase to occur from January to February 1985, and contingent upon receiving favorable proposals, with contract award to be made in March 1985. The Construction Phase is expected to last 52 weeks, and allowing 8 • weeks for installation of furnishings, equipment, and collection, we anticipate the Eden Prairie Library will be open to the public in ._._._ ..._ . ... June 1986. 5. Development Method: • Project is being financed through sale of Hennepin County Library Bonds and will be solely occupied and managed by the County Library System. -- —— 6. Preliminary Architectural Drawings:. --— _-- -.._ Not applicable, drawings submitted for review are Construction Docu "" ments, approximately 70% complete. 7. Legal Instruments, Associations Documents, Easements, etc.: There is a 40 foot wide, underground easement along the South property line for purposes of extending a sanitary sewer line Westerly from Preserve Boulevard. See attached Easement Agreement dated December 21, 1982. • /.l © 0 Eden Prairie Community Library (Continued) 8. Housing or land/building use profile, square foot of building to land area, parking, etc.: Building •• 10,000 GSF Parking and driveways 35,577 •SF Total site 2.51 acres x 43,560 SF • 109,335.80 SF Floor area ratio • .10 9. County 1/2 Section Requirement Waived by City Staff 10. Area location map: The site for the Eden Prairie Community Library is at the Southwest Quadrant of the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard, and is to the immediate South of the Eden Prairie Regional Shopping Center. Adjacent properties are zoned Commercial and Resi- dential. 11. Parking: The initial constitution will provide parking for 74 automobiles plus a concrete surfaced parking stall for motorcycles. This amount of parking exceeds City of Eden Prairie parking requirements and is based on the demand for services at other County Community Libraries. - To.. To accommodate future expansion of the Eden Prairie Library to 12,000 to 13,000 square feet, the parking lot is designed to permit its ex- pansion to 84 vehicles. 12. Sub-soil information: A total of six soil borings were taken on the Eden Prairie Library Site, each to a depth of 15 feet below the existing grade. The soil borings revealed the surface layer to be black silty topsoil to a depth of 1 to 2 feet underlain by medium dense to extremely dense silty sand and sandy silt. None of the soil borings disclosed ground water during or immediately after completion of the drilling operations. 13. Additional information: The proposed Eden Prairie Community Library will provide for a larger and permanent facility to replace the smaller temporary library located on Eden Prairie Road near Round Lake and will provide more adequate library service to the community. It's initial construction will con- tain 10,000 gross square footage and the facility is planned to accom- modate a future library expansion of 2,000 to 3,000 square feet as well as an addition of 2,000 square feet to accommodate a proposed histori- cal museum for the Eden Prairie Foundation, The Architects for the proposed Eden Prairie Library are the Leonard Parker Associates, who were also the Architects for the Gelco Head- quarters built in Eden Prairie a few years back, Attachments: Copy of Casement dated December 21, 1982. •• (' EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned, the County of Hennepin, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the owner of certain property located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as: } Lot 2, Block 1, Holmes Anderson Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota ("Servient Property") • does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey onto the owner from time to time of certain property located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Holmes Anderson Addition, ------- -- according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota • ("Dominant Property") --_._- a-non-exclusive -easement underground and across.rhe_-south 40 feet--- (as measured parallel to the most southerly linc) of the Servient Property for the purpose of constructing, using and maintaining utility lines, but not access to the Dominant Property. TN WITNESS tiTHEREOF., said._County of Hennepin has_executed_..__ this Easement as of this Z ti day of December, 1982. COUNTY OF UENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA • BY Df i {, • airman u ne ennepin ounty / I 'r,1• nrTEST 4,- { Clerk o.j.:w County Board 407 • / . 0 0 .. / STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ;.),I Al day of December, 1962, by John E. Derus, Chairman of the Board of the County of Hennepin, a municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. .e.1•N JUDtTH A.CHU.'.1LEY al \ y 1 �j (� f r:i-t :• 1 • ` l ��i' .I Fmuonr'Iv CiKHtiTV Z tar u is j1 • My Commhuon Gpvts Nov2I,19E5 i(' ; y t/_ I MMNNIlNlINNIMIN�'NIIlrj This instrument was drafted by: • I • i I i I • ILeg 0 a STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner ' TiROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: January 11,.1985 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Public Library s LOCATION: Southwest quadrant of Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard. REQUEST: Site Plan Review within a Public Zoning District for the construction of a 10,000 square foot building to be known as the Eden Prairie Public Library. Background This site was previously reviewed by j: �= { _ .. f the Planning Commission, in October, i;. f30-30' ' 1982. At that time, the Planning '•i ,,,. , C'FC ../.ii0•ir </..,.... Commission reviewed a request for ':' f Y ' ,1,,.�,, • OFc .rezoning from Rural to Public, for 357,' use as a library site, and a ivt�r.) 13 l.,z5.`7 C-REG Preliminary Plat of ten acres into \ ` it_ ` N two lots with road right-of-way for t \,^ Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard. A preliminary site plan was ; r*, 78-56 N‹; reviewed, with recommendations for 110MW`.�,, C-REG - R ' _ ' approval including a detailed site '<<1�>" /__\ '\ ' t-.•rki"/ plan review bythe Planning0- � d ;� 1. . . ' ' ;:x t.i - ./, Commission prior to construction, �( {' `N,, _ proper screening of parking, con- Y" `,`S t:-REG- struction of a five-foot concrete 30 +-, � ;'�SER sidewalk, along Preserve Boulevard 14ur� "'�— :�•�.,,td 1,r, ''` and Prairie Center Drive, and �, l� f""1; r -:' �„ dedication of road right-of-way for _ l. SITEk, PROPOSED �1'` -+ir Preserve Boulevard. .. — ,,ate: .: -,J ii '�•M.t S ,.. „ Site Plan •'• . l�T_ ,�� • af+ :. `,- I,� ...X,:-.4';'W ,`, The site plan involves the con- � ,: C+struction of a 10,000 square foot \ ;'i ,public library on 2.5 acres of land. \ ,• The building and parking areas are ;,- . -',`=' • located on-site in compliance with ''.' `"., '`" �•: • minimum building and parking set- • ' + � '"""- '{r 1 ! backs. A total of 74 parking spaces {1 are provided on-site. City Code ,. All''' ." LO C T ON MAP • © 0 Eden Prairie Public Library 2 January 11, 1985 does not have a specific requirement for libraries, however, Staff feels that the parking would be adequate. Parking is provided at a ratio of 7.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area, compared to office use at five spaces per 1,000, and commercial uses at eight spaces per 1,000. Ultimate building plans for the library include an expansion for a future historical society. Expansion along the eastern portion of the site, meets setback requirements for public zoning. There is room on-site to provide for an additional ten parking spaces. Grading The site slopes in a northeasterly direction from a high point, at about elevation 898, to a low point at 878, adjacent to the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard. A general way of describing the grading is that the high points are cut approximately five to eight feet to fill some of the low areas on-site. Berming is provided along Preserve Boulevard and Prairie Center Drive to screen parking areas. There is a 2/1 slope in the southwest corner of the site, which is approximately 14 feet high. The landscape plan indicates that a crown vetch ground cover will be utilized to stabilize the slope. Since considerable grading will occur on the Eden Commons site to the south, the opportunity exists for coordination of grading which may allow this slope to be more moderate. The proponent should coordinate grading with the adjacent land owner. Storm water run-off is proposed to drain across parking areas into catch basins. From that point, storm water run-off will be directed to an existing storm sewer pipe in Prairie Center Drive. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted which depicts the type, size, and location of proposed plant materials on-site. Some additional evergreen trees will be needed in selective locations near the driveway entrances to provide for an acceptable screening of the vehicles. Landscaping is heavily concentrated around the perimeter of the parking area, in the back side of the site, leaving the area in front of the building adjacent to Preserve Boulevard and Prairie Center Drive open. Staff would recommend that additional shade trees, and evergreen trees, be planted in the front yard, to improve the visual appearance of the site. Access Access to this site will be provided by driveways off Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard. The driveways are located at a distance of 250 feet from the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard. The driveway access to Preserve Boulevard is 280 feet north of Carriage Court. Code requires a minimum intersection distance of 150 feet. Roadways Preserve Boulevard is platted with 100 feet of right-of-way. The road is currently two lanes. The ultimate design for Preserve Boulevard is a four lane roadway. 0 4 7 Eden Prairie Public Library 3 January 11, 1985 ( Sidewalks 1 As,a condition of approval of the rezoning request, sidewalks were required along Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard. The developer's agreement indicates a requirement for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Prairie Center Drive only. Staff feels that it is important to provide a sidewalk along Preserve Boulevard to provide a connection point to proposed housing to the south of the library site. The Eden Commons Apartments will be constructing a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Preserve Boulevard as well. Architecture The building will be a one-story, 10,000 square foot building, with a pitched roof, with primary building materials to be face brick and glass. Some rock face block will be utilized as an accent strip around the perimeter of the building, above the windows on the lintels, and beneath the windows along the ground level. There are several enclosures, indicated on the site plan, for mechanical units, trash, and transformers. The enclosures will be constructed primarily of face brick to match the building. Signage and Lighting No lighting or signage plan has been provided for review. The proponent should submit overall plans with details prior to building permit issuance. SUMMARY The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the request for site plan review for a 10,000 square foot building to be known as the Eden Prairie Public Library on 2.5 acres of land based upon plans dated December 10,- 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985, and subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Modify the landscape plan to provide for additional coniferous trees to effectively screen parking areas from public roads. Add shade and coniferous trees within the front yard to add visual interest. 2. Submit an overall lighting plan with details for review. 3. Submit an overall signage program with details for review. 4. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District and City Engineer with notification 48 hours in advance of grading. 5. Construct a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along both Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard concurrent with building construction. tiff/ i Planning Commission Minutes 10 January 14, 1985 A • • B. EDEN PRAIRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY, by Hennepin County Library. Request for Zoning District Amendment within a Public Zoning District on 2.51 acres for the construction of a 10,000 square foot library. Location: Southwest corner of Prairie Center Drive and Preserve Boulevard. A public meeting. Staff reviewed the proposed plans for the library building and presented the Staff Report findings and conclusions regarding the proposal. Hallett asked if the Historical Society had planned space in the structure. Staff responded that the had not at this time, but that there was space available on the lot for expansion in the future. Chairman Bearman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. • MOTION: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hennepin County Library for Zoning • District Amendment with the Public Zoning District on 2.51 acres for construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. public library, based on plans dated December 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985. • • Motion carried--4-0-0 • • qq , C CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #85-40 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BERGIN AUTO BODY FOR JAMES J. BERGIN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Bergin Auto Body, by James J. Bergin, dated September 1, 1984, consisting of 4.74 acres into one lot and one outlot for an auto body • repair shop, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of February, 1985. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor • ATTEST: • • • John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • 1111 • l If you're particuh . E; 9Ln dquto �vody complete repair and painting • foreign and domestic 14560 Martin Drive • Edon Prairie, MN 55344 Jim Bergin —934470145 December 27, 1984 City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Rd. • Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344 Attn: Planning Commission RE: Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review Gentlemen: Bergin Auto Body is requesting site plan approval for Iot 2 Block 1 Outlot E (7th Addition), in the Edenvale Industrial Park. This parcel is a full two -acres, and we are asking approval to divide this into 2 one acre plats. Bergin Auto Body will use the southeasterly one acre for its facilities; and if the division is • approved, we have a proposal from an auto and truck mechanical repair shop, to build a similar type structure on the other northeasterly one acre plat. The original location of Bergin Xuto Body, which is presently at 14560 Martin Drive, does not offer adequate parking or screening for cars parked ready for repair. Therefore, relocating the • premises to the new proposed site will greatly improve appearance and offer better service to the community. The building we are proposing consists of 6000 square feet, with the site presently zoned I-2 Park, for this type of business. The site coverage ratio is 14;5, allowing for a possible expansion in the future. There will be adequate parking and also a fenced area • on the side for ears waiting to be repaired. The privacy fence will be of wooden structure, or as per commission recommendation. The building is primarily a concrete structure with decorative b]oeks painted in a yet to be decided color scheme. It will fit in very well with al) of the surrounding buildings, which are built with similar materials. The exterior lighting will consist of the required amount of quartz wall-mounted security lights. •• L/i/q • City of Eden Prairie Planning Commission -2- December 27, 1984 The site is located at the southeast corner of Corporate Way and Martin Drive. There are presently no structures on this site and all the utilities are available. We will be requesting a free standing sign permit, such as is presently being used at our original location, if this meets with the city's approval. Borings and tests on the soil have been taken by Subterranean Engineering Corporation. In the enclosed boring copy you can determine that this building Site will need to be excavated and corrected using engineered fill. We intend to follow their • recommendations. We do not intend to use roof top equipment for our mechanical needs. At most, there will be only an air conditioning coil. The make up air system for our paint booth will not protrude through the roof, and air will be dispersed through the wall at the back of the building. We lease the premises where our present business is located. The ownership has recently changed and we have no assurance that the • building will not be sold. We need to have an early assurance that our request to build in Eden Prairie will be approved. If so, we will proceed as early this spring as possible, with ab ei3tweek time period for the completion of our building plans. Sincerely, BERGIN AUTO BODY, INC. James J. Bergin President • JJB/nb I]pJ )r ,{�C cry,,,, ', . • )- III .. 4z i. ... +; uf• ----'•; .rr . f}a r. ti PU!04 TOR • „ 0010 1 •• ,F, , ttt ."+ ~ ooT • • '1 fe • ••• I' '1 t1 py i s ♦r ,: `. / • 0 ..�� ,n:, Wed• ♦, I i •0� ` A'. • • •/•� ¢ (wt '�z • ` _ k it -a. 3 -. Y/ • ., : a ,ry, • .r • eie '. /'�'1 .4,,'.�'�'e e34,4r-\.Jlf�.`. "` eM .. 1�, r� �a�C /'S"��Q.t,�4-/. `j01': � ♦'r:i�f /.• • _-_ • ..:......_ . • .. • -.' ''•'''-' ''' �4..1.` 4 t 41 . .,I� EDEVALE t• • \ - ut ' . �: o �0 ®� 3�iUT Dt S�: ` �7�t� l'FKI. JJ •♦. ``.``,:s a cw / '.-9/\ V lcw [ri- •B.D•._`Y-\L i> • :AALE • ., . ' `+ ` o .�� �,' (�tn) • �� �M,ADDS � t (:t) .. .- ,' ,..t... •5 / to 0 t • �e.• ': :sty ♦11 a ,,,\ -vat- i..,l', . �a •ft• ? '¢1DJy • •t , • t_ - E--" _Of. Cabe, P :� .: .•., (s ra tilt '.a i • �e tS'� �� -� !r�eSSeS cv . 1 . CI) i I. . . • ..... i 1 .. i , 6) i .. . \ •-\ca ,,, .... . 0 • 0 .4% ...0 Iti (. . I[ i. f% . 1..),..... . I . i i I . . / . .... N.. Q.. " `f i . ; IMI . V/ 1 ._.. i h` ! 1I 'PLAT . PERMIT I I �:,,,tis ILJ1O 'cI\c u—\ �L>J _ L PARCEL NUMBER SIGN PERMIT r Address(Please Print or Type) e• ^. VILLAGE Of EDEN PRAIRIE . ISA Sti)9 VY\c.,S3+u1 1,-).34.;)4.-) .9 j0 EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD Sign , EDEN PRAIRIE, MI NNESOTA�55343 •• Erector �, wrtiser •S ._• PHONE 94I-2262 ` ' t Ph one .R \tom Qv- f.17 `.<=•.-r s-1 `j, y•t,. LICENSE FEES SIZE OF SIGN - AREA Volidoticn',I • n \ }is..r.. SsS.m _X_' Sq.F1. ' �7Cg I 4 44 . 49 J ' • r. ...roo s..rr. m.w _X_� Sq.Ff. - ' ..;:.r... ao s..r•..ss.w _X—. - Sq.Ft. o.1n.f r,..�.s.p Total Areal $q.Ft.� '.•'..'••r..n,.., . v...r°'".. Far Surfaces .S.00 ( F . a.... ..o sa. ••p n 100 Fee Penalty - Total Fee Paid 1 00..o s..e.• S.w-- A?plicotion for BusinessCP2 Advertisingr Sign Erectiory'n Renewal=- Permit for o Wall= Roof= Ground ProlcctingO Combination=Revolving=Temparary=Directipna ftiliboard= type of sign to be erected in the VI LLAGE OF EDEN PRAIRIE constructed of the following materiols: •((,���VV��//// - ;Sate Issued Expires • I hereby acknowledge that I hove read this application and state thot the infer-t`-.'A [ -U\ motion fi correct end agree to comply with the EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. Setback from Property Lines laws, regulating sign construction nd placement. n/nJ Fran1_ if. Side It Rear //Y '!✓� %4/4 J..- ircighr of Sign - /Ssgnature of Appliconr• -:., hhove Groekk ft. Above Roof Ft.- t7i 7V'l1i.- Approved / yJ`/ . ./c " /7 _('Iovrescen.l1 Neon= Inconoescent=Flashing= Director of License and Inspections�✓-�'tL' ci-e,••• t..rt . 1 nt o j Li. •1 T �• c 3 9 *2 yy (n m p xi • 1v 1 yf. y S 7c m Z e m u v i+- ti _.+ _ o o u o L A u u N u Y (.,4'1 C I '�,� ,�• Z1.1 m , C. N .N.. `1 �., y r - .I, ._�-A` 5 n _ Seroi'm A4.V0 r F. enr r� m .0 Z 0 73 D /t I \ y • (' zi m .V l.. • 1/1-17 STAFF REPORT • TO Planning Commission • FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: January 11, 1985 SUBJECT: Bergin Auto Body APPLICANT FEE OWNER: Jim Bergin LOCATION: North of Martin Drive, west of Corporate Way REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within Existing 1-2 Park District, with variances for lot size. 2. Preliminary Plat of 4.74 acres into three lots Background '•r/7"'�% om /, \ RM-2 The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- t' N,_„•J%� '' \ fies an Industrial land use for this - =Y----I ----.7=---7:// �/ -1�• _r. `mot site. This site is part of the -*r;C ,T 'y Edenvale Industrial Park, which was i`;A\ '2 j ',�\•, \:..i i rezoned to I-2 Park in 1970. This i��%",: _ :a. �./�',� \''‘.. site was platted as Outlot E at that 1<%,r'• -: •/ nt' Y time. ai / `' �,J ..� , ��_'.' The site is located at the ,..!4'.;:1, r 1 • intersection of Martin Drive and ';; • "--- / _ ` `)/ k Corporate Way, just south of the -'''�� / ` ` ��. 1 . 0 _, Crown Auto office/warehouse build- ,��� '' (I7 4i— .._ n�.� ,__ • with some vegetation along the 7,�j� 9-5 J4 �_ •� ,r. �. - western border of the site. // 4- 1 Grn 2PRK &-._._Preliminary Plat q4 __ i 1 ' The preliminary plat request in- �T-. -- r,____ PROPOSED SITE •- - valves the subdivision of 4.74 acres �!-"1G 3 . into three lots. Two of the lots I „_,.. V are one-acre in size. For I-2 Park i IG•i _ zoning, the minimum lot size should 1-5 PRK :�)�. be two acres. The proponent will be 17.1) 7::• asking for a variance the Board of -- ` J,.�. Appeals. The general character of .1v_:� .--�— the Edenvale Industrial Park could T1., RI-22 �.. LI r'iiC� 'r•9•vc��/ '78,39 r A[ --7. LOCA�T K fi 4 MAP • Bergin Auto Body 2 January 11, 1985 be described as a small-lot industrial park, since lot sizes vary from 15,000 sq. ft. up to four acres in size. The request for preliminary plat should be limited to proposed Lot 2, since specific development plans are not available at this time to evaluate the appropriateness of land usage on the other lots. For this reason, proposed Lots 1 and 3 should be combined and left as an outlot. In addition, it is difficult to substantiate and evaluate the request for variance without specific development plans for proposed Lot 1. Site Plan The site plan involves the construction of a 6,000 sq. ft. industrial building for Bergin's Auto Body Repair. The site is proposed for development at an overall floor area ratio of 0.14. For I-2 Park zoning, Code would allow a floor area ratio of 0.30 for a one-story building. Building and parking areas are located on-site in compliance with front, rear, and side yard setbacks. Access to this site will be by two driveways off Corporate Way. The northerly driveway entrance will be a shared driveway with the proposed lot to the north. Parking requirements for a building of this size, based on proponent's intended use of the building, would be 19 parking spaces figured..at five spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area for 450 sq. ft. of office and three spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area for 5,550 sq. ft. of assembly. The Code would require the provision of 17 parking spaces figured at 50% office and 50%warehouse. A total of 31 parking spaces are provided. The proponent contends that ten permanent spaces would be necessary for employee parking, with the remaining 21 spaces being set aside within a screened-in area for storage of vehicles. There would also be room inside of the building to park approximately ten vehicles. Staff has observed numerous parking problems with the present Bergin Auto Body on • • Martin Drive within this same industrial park. The reason for the parking problems is that only nine permanent spaces are provided for a building of 6,000 sq. ft., which Bergin Auto Body shares with other tenants. • The site plan indicates a gravel parking area for the fenced-in storage area. Current Code requirements indicate that all parking areas must be hard-surfaced either with bituminous or concrete. Outdoor Storage Current I-2 Park zoning regulations do not permit outdoor storage. Outdoor storage defined by Code as related to vehicles would be any vehicle in excess of 3/4 ton. The site plan indicates an area for outdoor storage, which Bergin intends to utilize for vehicles, including cars, vans, and small pick-up trucks. The area is proposed to he screened with a six-foot high, hoard-on-board cedar fence. A berm and some plantings are proposed along two sides of the fenced area to create a better "front- door" appearance to the site. Any vehicles in excess of 3/4 ton would have to be { stored inside of the building. . • Grading Since the site is relatively level, a minimum amount of grading will be necessary. Most of the re-grading of the property is proposed to involve the construction of • Bergin Auto Body 3 January 11, 1985 (_ berms around the site to screen parking areas and to add visual interest to the property. • The proposed drainage plan needs to be revised. The direction of the drainage is towards open areas on adjacent properties. The stormwater run-off needs to be directed towards the existing stormwater run-off system within Corporate Way and Martin Drive. This means that the elevation of the land will have to be raised between one and four feet in.order to provide positive drainage towards Corporate Way. Landscaping/Screening The extent of proposed plantings is minimal and should be supplemented with coniferous trees and other plantings to provide a more attractive site. Coniferous trees should be added around the perimeter of the proposed vehicle storage area. Some of the proposed coniferous materials might be located along the berm in front of the building, as well. The size of the proposed plant materials is small and will need to be upgraded as follows: Shade Trees 21/2" caliper minimum size Coniferous Trees 6 ft. minimum height. Shrubs 24" minimum size pot Architecture The proposed industrial building is shown to be 22 ft. high and constructed of three primary building materials, including break-off block for the accent band around the top of the building, rock face block along the front elevation facing Corporate Way, and common concrete block for the balance of the structure. Plain concrete block is not permitted per Code. Staff recommends a continuation of the break-off face block around the perimeter of the building with the balance of the building constructed • with either a decorative concrete block, or a continuation of the rock face block. The proponent should also provide color samples of the proposed painting schedule for the building including the color of the overhead doors. Screening of rooftop mechanical units is required per Code. The proponent should provide sight lines showing the effectiveness of-rooftop mechanical screening proposed and indicate the type of materials to be used far screening the mechanical units. Signane/Lighting The proponent should submit an overall signage plan with details, and an overall lighting plan with details for review prior to building permit issuance. RECOMMENDATIONS: — 1 The Planning Con;nission may wish to choose any of the following alternative courses of action: 1. The Commission could recommend approval of the request for Zoning District Amendment for 1.0 acre within the I-2 Park District and preliminary plat of 1-6/ Bergin Auto Body 4 January 11, 1985 4.74 into three lots, based on plans dated August 13, and September 1, 1984, • subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985, including the following conditions: A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. Revise the preliminary plat to designate proposed lots 1 and 3 as one outlot. 2. Modify the building elevations to indicate primary building • materials as a continuation of the decorative break-off block and rock face block. 3. Revise the landscape plan to increase the size and number of proposed plant materials adding coniferous trees. 4. Modify the grading plan to direct stormwater run-off towards Corporate Way. 5. Modify the site plan to include hard-surfacing of bituminous, or concrete, for the screened-in parking area on-site. • • 6. Provide sight line drawings which indicate the effectiveness of the materials to be used for mechanical screening. B. Prior to final plat, proponent shall submit detailed stormwater run- off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District and the City Engineer. C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 2. Submit an overall signage plan with details for review. 3. Submit an overall lighting plan with details for review. 4. Submit color samples of the intended color spectrum for the rock face block and decorative break-off block materials for the structure. 2. The Commission could recommend approval of the plans as submitted; or, 3. The Commission could return the development plans to the proponent for revisions to the site plan and preliminary plat and site plan as indicated in the Staff Report; or, 4. The Commission could recommend denial. C152 • Planning Comnission Minutes 9 January 14, 1985 • F. BERGIN AUTO BODY, by James J. Bergin. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Park District for one acre, with variances to he reviewed by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 4.74 acres into one lot and two outlots for an auto body repair shop. Location: North of Martin Drive, west of Corporate Way. A public hearing. • Mr. James Bergin, proponent reviewed the proposed development and site features with the Commission. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985, regarding the proposal. Staff pointed out the request of the proponent for a lot size smaller than the I-2 Park District allowed, adding that there were other lots in this vicinity with I-2 Park zoning which were approximately the same size--one acre. tI5a Planning Commission Minutes 10 January 14, 1985 { Johannes asked if sufficient screening existed towards the rear of the lot. Mr. Bergin stated that there would be trees for screening in this area. Staff'responded that the detailed landscape plan would be reviewed prior to building permit issuance and that screening would also be checked at that time. MOTION 1: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to close the public hearing. Motion carried--4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bergin Auto Body for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Park District on approximately one acre, for an. auto body repair shop, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans dated September 1, 1984, subject to the I recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985. Motion carried--4-O-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bergin Auto Body for Preliminary Plat of 4.74 acres into one lot and one outlet for an auto body repair shop, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based an plans dated September 1, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985. Motion carried--4-0-0 • . 11/ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #85-41 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ROBERTS LITHO FOR HOYT DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Roberts Litho for Hoyt Development, dated December 20, 1984, consisting of 9.62 acres into one lot for the construction of a 42,500 square foot office/warehouse building, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of February, 1985. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk I • tj557. • • . / Hoj'l Dcvelopn:co.,8,300 Grand A,tnue Soulb,.5linncapc.1s,...ancsota 55420(612)884 4,338 December 20, 1984 • City of Eden Prairie 8950 Eden Prairie Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 . Attn: Planning Commission ,; Re: Rezoning Requests, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review t j Gentlemen: i I Hoyt Development is requesting rezoning and site plan approval for Lot 1, Block 1 Hoyt Roberts Addition. The site is presently zoned rural, and Guide Planned I-5 Park. We are requesting rezoning to I-2 Park with a lot size of 9.62 acres. The project will consist 1 of two buildings, the first will be utilized as a corporate I headquarters facility for Roberts Litho Inc. and will total 42,066 square feet. Parking has been provided, for 131 vehicles as opposed to code requirement for a minimum of 127 spaces. The exterior finish of the building will be rake type finish, precast concrete panels and stucco, with bronze framed and tinted glass. i Exterior lighting will be accomplished with wall mounted quartz fixtures. Building identification will be in compliance with City ordinances. The second building will encompass 65,400 square I feet, and will have parking for 209 vehicles as opposed to a Code requirement of 197 vehicles. The combined site coverage of the two properties is 25.6%. This is below the allowed coverage of 30%, however, we are allowing for a possible expansion of the . 1 Roberts building at some point in the future which would bring the coverage closer to 29%. 1 There are no existing structures nor is there any significant vegetation on the site other than wild grasses. The site is located south of Eaton Fluid Power, north of the Eden Prairie I Methodist Church land bordering Scenic Heights Road, and to the I west of CPT and Cooperative Power Association. It is located at the end of a cul-de-sac, Technology Drive, and is presently served by all utilities. The design of the project is taking into I account the possible extension of Technology Drive across the north border of the site to a termination at Wallace Road. We I have reviewed the City's proposed plans for the road, should it be I built, and have provided for same. In the event the road is constructed, we will require only one variance, that being a I 1 i 4111 . � ll `J j City of Eden Prairie Planning Commission -2- December 20, 1984 • reduction in setback for the building from 50 feet to 30 feet. We feel this is quite an accomplishment in view of the long narrow nature of the property. The tenant for the, first building, Roberts Litho, was originally intended to be located in the Northrup King development but has been relocated to this site due to delays in the Northrup King approval process. Due to this fact, we are severely constrained by a construction schedule and an existing lease that calls for �. occupancy during late May, 1985 of the warehouse portion of the building. With this in mind, we anticipate a start date immediately upon receipt of requisite City approvals. We anticipate this will be in early February, 1985. Building Two will be constructed at such time as substantial preleasing has been accomplished. St is intention of Hoyt Development to seek a build-to-suit type tenant for this building rather than to develop a speculative multi-tenant building. sf The property is presently encumbered by a $232,000.00 utility assessment and is therefore ready for development. We ask that the request for rezoning, site plan approval and preliminary plat be approved as presented. • Sincerely, HOYT DEVELOPMENT Bradley A. Hoyt Partner BAH:jmc • • • • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner HT-00DH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: January 11, .1985 • • SUBJECT: Roberts litho APPLICANT $ FEE O'vWNER: Hoyt Development . LOCATION: South of Highway #5, west of Mitchell Road, north of Scenic Heights Road, at Technology Drive .REQUEST: Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park and Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into one lot Background • , . V s_��� �-. ,t t-":- _-i_,_ The Comprehensive Guide Plan identi- �- , ,,, "'nj5 'fies an industrial land use for this .17. site. It also depicts one of the alternative locations for Highway ^N j/ =i6_i -•-.0 15y1 #212 aligning through this property. ` / 1-5 PRK 1-5PRK The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts • )�. J i : .� surrounding land uses as industrial , i to the west, north, and east of the . • site, with a public land use ?'„/.••r' -1 _2 , designation to the south. Existing ,f 7g Ut>/ 7p.38 land uses are Eaton-Charlynn to the • north, CPT and Cooperative Power to 4 ,, r the east, a church to the south, and / 4 V • an industrial subdivision to the -- i' `3=') •0 \r- PROPOSED SiTE west. • !• • L;:.;f_� _ — sl --4 _ Site Plan , J/ 1-'•-a �. i'J--1':!';1- =::-( . k_-,7 -_-,.-,i• f,J/ ...ii: 't1 R M•' The site plan involves the construc- - ,i , - ��, % ,..1 tion of a 42,000 sq. ft. 'I ,l`T-= t �` ..11 1 ' office/warehouse building for { ;. .> j - 1V rtL" � _ l f 1�t i. . l: l ill T.I�1 1..? . Roberts Litho, a printing business, _ / with expansion of this structure ','`j._1 - _. ., 1 -•7j(;,. h:l r.1.. • shown to 61,666 sq. ft. The site ..': i . ?, . 11 �it c... , plan also depicts a future building .1 .' ! ' r" for office and industrial uses of ., �` '-ii \ 1!, - V 1 u. 65,400 sq. ft. The floor area ratio ~ , ''.--- ' h i - • tt ,. `J for the proposed Roberts Litho '1.11 • i{ ••. I f building would he 0.10. The total • `,1 `\ �'...• floor area ratio, . including both /� buildings, would he 0.30. °CATION (/,����Aqpp USG • Roberts Litho 2 January 11, 1985 Parking is provided at a ratio of three spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. A total of 127 spaces are shown for the Roberts Litho building, with expansion to 197 parking spaces based on a total building square footage of 61,666 sq. ft. Future parking is also provided at a similar ratio. if figured at 50% office, 50% warehouse usage, a total of 115 spaces would be required for the Roberts Litho building. Since the preliminary plat of the property involves road right-of-way for future extension of Technology Drive, building setbacks should be taken from the proposed right-of-way line as opposed to using the existing property lines. Attachment A shows the location of the proposed right-of-way on a copy of the site plan. Setbacks to the building will be as close as 30 ft. and setbacks to parking will be as close as 10 ft. For I-2 Park zoning, Code requires that setbacks to building and parking areas in the front yard be no less than 50 ft. The applicant's narrative indicates that they would be requesting a variance for setbacks in the event that the road is constructed. The applicant cites the unusual and narrow configuration of the property as a hardship substantiating the request for variance. Attachment B indicates one alternative method of developing the site in compliance with minimum requirements for I-2 Park zoning. Staff does not feel that the unusual configuration of the property, alone, provides enough substantiation for the variance, since the site is undeveloped at this time and is 9.62 acres in size. Since only plans for the Roberts Litho building have been provided, the rezoning request should be limited to the extent of land area needed to develop the site in compliance with minimum requirements for I-2 Park zoning. The balance of the property should remain Rural. Preliminary plans also indicate that variances from front yard setbacks to the future building and parking would be necessary. The site plan and building plans should be revised to conform to ordinance. Grading The existing topography of the site indicates that the property is relatively level. The site slopes gently in all directions towards the center of the site, where a small depression exists. Proposed grading will not change the contours significantly, other than to provide a level building pad area for the building and positive drainage across the parking areas. Stormwater run-off is proposed to drain across the parking areas into catch basins, which are directed to a proposed 27-inch storm sewer pipe to be connected to an existing 27-inch sewer pipe in the cul-de-sac at the end of Technology Drive. Landscaping The amount of space adjacent to proposed Technology Drive, does not provide enough room for berming and landscaping to screen parking and loading areas. This suggests that the site plan should he revised to provide additional green space along proposed Technology Drive. Staff feels that the modification to the site as suggested on Attachment B would provide a 50 ft. front yard setback to parking and loading, which would also provide enough area to create a berm of nine feet in height at a 3/1 slope. This would also provide more room for generous landscaping for visual appeal. Roberts Litho 3 January 11, 1985 Architecture The building is proposed to be constructed primarily of pre-cast concrete panels and stucco. The building has a warehouse appearance, since only a small percentage of the building will be glass. Approximately half of the north elevation, which would face Technology Drive, would have an office-like appearance. Surrounding building materials vary considerably from pre-cast panels on the Eaton- Charlynn property to brick and glass for the Cooperative Power and CPT buildings. The industrial park to the west of the property along Wallace Road represents a variety of materials including brick, stone, glass, wood, stucco, and concrete. Since the building has a warehouse appearance, compliance with the minimum 50 ft. setback becomes more important from a visual standpoint. Plantings will be necessary in front of the warehouse portion of the building to break up the massive appearance of the structure. Sight lines indicate that the rooftop mechanical equipment would be screened by the extension of a parapet wall. In addition, the rooftop mechanical units would be screened by a metal panel, which would be architecturally compatible with the proposed metal on the building. Access Access to this site is provided by a cul-de-sac on the eastern-most portion of the property. Future plans by the City identify need for the extension of Technology Drive on an alignment between this site and the Eaton-Charlynn site to the north. Technology Drive would extend from Prairie Center Drive, across Mitchell Road, and connect to Wallace Road. The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan also indicates alternative locations for the alignment of Highway #212. Attachment C shows the alignment preferred by the City, which would follow Highway #5 and the railroad tracks before extending out into the Rural area. The other alignment would follow Highway #5 for a shorter distance, then turning in a southwesterly direction, crossing Mitchell Road between Cooperative Power and CPT buildings and align through the Roberts Litho property, crossing County Road #4 approximately one-quarter mile south of the railroad track crossing. Road Improvements The preliminary plat involves dedication of right-of-way for the extension of Technology Drive. Normally, right-of-way dedication would require the construction of the adjacent street, however, since other properties will benefit from the road, a special assessment agreement obligating the property owner to a proportionate share of the costs can be used as a subsititute. This has been used on other projects such as Hidden Glen and Prairie Knoll. Signaqe and Lighting An overall signage plan, with details, and an overall lighting plan, with details, should be submitted for Staff review prior to building permit issuance. (160 Roberts Litho 4 January 11, 1985 • f RECOMMENDATIONS: i i The Planning Commission may choose to recommend any of the following courses of action: 1. The Commission could recommend approval of the request for rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park and Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into one lot, based on 1 plans dated December 20, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff I Report of January 11, 1985, including the following conditions: • A. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: 1. Modify the rezoning request limiting the area for rezoning to I-2 Park to the land area necessary to accommodate • Roberts Litho in compliance with requirements for I-2 Park zoning or approximately 4.62 acres. 2. Modify the site plan in a manner similar to Attachment B, with building setbacks and parking setbacks at 50 ft. from proposed Technology Drive. 3. Modify the landscape plhn to provide for screening of parking and loading facilities from proposed Technology Drive. • 4. Plat and dedicate the road right-of-way for Technology Drive. Enter into a special assessment agreement for road construction cost for Technology Drive extension. B. Prior to final plat, proponent shall submit detailed stormwater run- off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District • and City Engineer. • C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Pay the required Cash Park Fee. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours prior to grading. 3. Submit an overall signage plan, with details, and an overall lighting plan, with details, for review. 2. The Commission could recommend approval of the request as submitted by proponent; or, 3. The Commission could recommend that the development plans be returned to the proponent for revisions based on recommendations of the Staff Report of January 11, 1985; or, I 4. The Commission could recommend denial of the request for rezoning and l preliminary plat. (1161 . , 1 . .•,s % ..' I ' . • t . 'i s•-• '''.. !." ' .1. ... . , : , I.- .. ; ...... .... 1 : , i ', I i ,.. 11-..i.,'•,_ . ,V :14 . . ' \ i ..f.,:1 1;7. --i.1"-- .,...7 t • ,.... , ..4.-•••••• •, ,• • • - 1 I 1 4 •• .• •r4 44...:_. .,,....71 1 ---I ---— '--- C'ii . • i ,‘, { ,1-,-.. •-•,-el •-•.1,:i'-'..1:. , • ''''-.04 i k <!....,..,.-4,1,---.-Tr ,--; .-;.L..;',,.-1:'• "- ..t— O.. 0 kC‘L I ,..--,- \• ' .....,..,:I:7._ •-•.-0.1.,.;--1.7.; - .-- Cr- t 't",f• . t b 4\ . 1----- ot r? '!" 41- .4 • \ t.--- •---\ -----;1/4--'17,.-• 1-----,--4___ __•._,,„....--\;-----"1 -K1— 1 •: ' I % 1.1-.)%132 ( 1.. i . \(I-- i . 7 ..‘,---.. ..i...._....r=rx.--.15 CI.?,''C'••/•,";.:,...4",'.-. ha t•11ie.:'...1•;,,N1X1;*4 • a i 1 _ il'r _. 4 it • 1 — — a 1 • .. \ 6 0"r.a.-..k-,----1-••• • 14.- , I .9 6 0 L L -- i. • . t • 6,1.- t , I ' I i • . • I.r) -__,1., " .4f./t1 r171 1- L———------—— - . \.„ I . lc 1 s C1 2. ,(1:0 4-- ) •11.1 (,, 6 ',. . I 7,f, 'I. ""ta co • . .-/--- 04: to . sy.)••• I 0 I- 0 cc n 04 . -• . , • tiv...." 4-4. _SN II , i .7—--1 i I : 1 (' di ' lii il ! n;':' ... L_ —— ---1.• - , , 1111 . : t .. 1 %;,, , , , t • (----,' ' -I'•-.'il . . i. ". • i . 1 . . . • e . . . . .,..--.<-0..7. • • .,-•el, : . ' . *1-:•-/ . .. NV .4• / ; , 1 *V. . '' ' . \ . : . i•c,'` I 4'.' i ' • . i • i ' i " ' ' , i . , : i ' : 1 •I• . • ' ' . . • , • I S . • I.• • , I 2 . I I -I (141 I 1 '1 i . •!. .. .... . 1 . . • i , • i • • i • - ' • ...1 • . • , ; • • , : • • ..t.,..... '`.... :' ; I : , i • . $ . 1 ,...._. „ • i; -.r 1..I .{-•,.. ;.; 1. -I"• 1( 1 : i -7-----:. N' t ! . il : 11 , i111 ).,k . . " t .. '';1•1 0 t 1 7t4 . ._ -.•‘, I 4 \,-,—z......... ,,' if: .1 . • 1 . ....... .4". f ) \1 ..1.,..1 I.:. —r:-‘:-C A-- 1 I (s el \ i i ,.....,..i_..... . .........__,,..1...... .. .,1..... .. .... ... • r. iti---. "11.\ i ---1--- .---0.....-- A.: --- 1_ . ....--,...... -:. 1r .....;•L'it. 1 • ,'S•." i -•A--''' -(1.7..•i- '1•• "•' . '.- \,.......1.e).. C1/431 1 ,t\./ x_24—;—,-;.....I.:: •,.L.,2.,•' rL_i.'--__ ., 0 • \""--- t„2.,-- 7..:E,•;1".;,,N:\,4* r 1''::._.--.,__ __A--____ .1____ co - • .7-.4 , --t•-• ,-,•":•T:.:',7::-i- - --•r-tr. — 1" 0) '''i D„.. 1. rtt v:11 :1--- • Li‘LI :•,14 • \Pi \ \ i— '-`x,...,___._ /.--•:---.1.- .' -----VI = —,, . i —7\-..). • V. i k -f---;•1"71 AN i . _____ ‘• -•:.... ....;t4x__....:...,„.,....;-; -.-1-------------=ky-----._ .,..3i ,,____--.-k ______,--,___1,--z•::!,,,...;,-,..,5..t..,,,,,i „t ! i d, ' ,_, ,:•13t..,,,.11,,c;-:;i —.,;,,,,.:;d,,,.;-- i i.<:(., . I • )1.--..- I 1 . . 1!l•:...... • Ar..cl---`---,7,4.# - • I ri—.0 1 • , \ ci- s --s-1:,_4,-;I. ,- •-.., • . t i .. • 1 . 1 .96.0 1 I I tt \ aft NNW 4.0••••••••••••••••••••• 1 • ----77—r, ; , , . 1 . • • 1' 1 if:( ) i,,ti......_ 4, --- 1 \----„, ..1 ,s.„ •••- , .4.14 t''7/ : L--•-- —--—__._ _ ._ Lj ••*:%4 ttr.14 (2 U: , (O 1..4 44- ti) . , _...tv- .....„., MI (5 (0) • .-> I co 1 '0 ca., . , 2 o . 41 ..,c' Oa: . I . I MI I /..--- *•,:: ""/ 2 CV .. & 1\ 1 a/ .., ,,- 1 • 9 7 N.1' t.Z.V.:.., I '':141ZL41 * ..'1, .I. g )1 I I I—5----1 I - i , i . • I • I • I '' ioLs. t 1 I 4.—7 \ I . \ ' I ' I t '. 1 . i ' • • • ,,,2-,t•-::.',7. ••`.: 't -4-: i.; '• . _L.. .T) •: .• 1 I I . 11 .,., 1 1 ___,._. * • • • ll\f`d5g) ---7. .. ( —-- — . MN‘1,42-.ro.i Llruncizzido_Liimi . • . . , (163 • . • •:.':—•• •..t...^ • k.\\ I•..,....• ...s re- ,...... __V-/It-'''''• `--IA: c, .,,t:• 'KV:, iq ••10 0 t.- -••,, ..* ...;,\,!A jir . ' vocr^ , ,,. ., i : - t 4vr 1 ' 60 -;•is-16,...11k..n....t.w.LJI...:.;-- .'-'- .........z. "P.;..._,Tili • ?..,.7--- •3* / VALE LroURT is 1 • IrA,:ss:,,•,:r 1 . t a ;I ••.•--4 I /. OREM VCO CNA T rt, _40 WI III. r•.4 S4,03.1. itri•d -,. 'rei r\l'AF-1.! 1.-/2.-e- . 00......„.....sj :7,9 \...• Tr*: .. , at*, rLr-':••••CN\e......p: ',,.-: -7 Y --....--,---,. L.1...._. V . LI r ..,,,,...,EST GAT( 1 L._,:,...,...•ilv---• t•-•/, ..-... a c.f... ,‘).. '• Z.,' • ...,...„: . RD EAFE It*Av .3 tArt ROAD L_.,____--J__Y•- A 1 k • . i sv O iii-1\ . L _y...,.. 4•ARIRL vE /r ‘4).1r IrA% .. • i ta It I 5 • , ., -------ir 1 r.....4,,, ... .,...„....„: l'..--:-/.: )9 /. f i ...d 6cLIII:e.p:A,--s:: ::••!-..4:............0„. ":„.....:::. .: La. •4.,,,. 7 9 PO ' .........•"•9................. . . 79-179- . Tr.6997?• : 3 ' _____--"' •.-- " "'. CEN,RAL C r : 5;.....*CX....•.... ' - ... . •• • / ',"".7rt"‘:y"....:i - • --.-. ..eX]3 If 1 11 , . •,wkwv.:.---,-,Fzi---__,--,t.... ;.- z...,., , , RED RCC4 RoAi!ii. ..(es.i ;kV ! e.. , ........ . Hr ..:,. ,,, . ......... „--.30_ •••••••91199.ii...........................;. '• ••••• 44•QiN, rN1- ,.:.x-4--41,13_5_ i / n. . ° ..10q9•••Mr c •':- "" •• \ s•-••••...j ••• / -- . r. .- •,:s. _i p,,, .c?e, 4ni,i 44 x::•\7, , \,is z• 2. v 4•:, ,. I I I/ 43 • I 41 CRA:NMANS LANE L ', ' 4?Tr A..4•000 COAT I . 43 9•'t.JLV5.8099 CT 4C'.. L ___TL, _, ..A. -: - isith ---annT--vir ----..:., ;:...t:,,.. . • 1 c.,• , CrCia.. KUL . 4 1 . ,.• ..• •• .. s 1 . .• 4 --- - 1:/ / i _....4, . : . ...,, .... ...--,-------- •• ,,... .... .....„ 1 -----------,--„J .,....!„..„, . ... ....-. .., Avr i.' i • • cL•-z.." d"-4..... '"' Il , .. ......._ 1. If/ .--" . , -.'"--...„......... , I ... i ,,.... . .. .*‘ , , 1 l• !:'' • ATT N C H IV\E NT 'C. ... ! _.. .... . ....... . r. Da AA ., 77---r1 ;:--%• .''UL-III '4% U04:\:p 1 I 4 IL4'.. •-4.7..--,.... i'1 V., ...NT 1 i r ''4* 43....\ ...........f.4.24i1;4‘ ,7. „„ if t.\ ' / -• - .0 .. ii. ..,10 —, ,.. ' II.t,. ::: ., )),I; i j14 '''''.-• .,......._., ,, , • :xt Fifa!,4, 1: I i g± 0,E wl:D EtIt..c ,.?--)1° fr7'..-( am ;-' 5.7.i.„..) ....._ WESTGATE k.s as(swore.La, 0 ..k...... I:L,IeE ROAD L__________J 4 i ----,;- 1 ' • , t., ,. , \\*•••.). Itt J i:7—....s......)..2,_,T a lit 5•1 GAT( . • ,......c ._ ...-...-., .-_-----•..... -- ,„,......,.. ....„,,......„,,,,,....,,,_,r,„,;.,,m,,.., ....no....... , .0.0••••:7;.• ;,..,-"':„i-'' . -'".04i,"7"- CtTY C.AW.L - ....,-,.•- ,e,,,,,__.„..,,s4... ........ .1,0,x,.:... aUDL•C SW ET Y . 1 '''-':. •c . T,....•72, 1 ,•E •, : --, 4 C, • ••a, ,„, •EN,AA.., i..., • •44 — i -, •-• ...S.USS.--J1Elati3 • el,4. .. S RED RCCA atk-7."...1. ,....i, • Ili... ,, i...‘ • 4,,,JAL—.4.• 1 V k...% 1 i . „ ............‘"/.: ://' . . . \\P DP 'Ns 0, • . • , :' ,.. 0: "--1",..-711•1211) a " e =1 R I D • _ s,.i. q-----J ,... 0 , 1.• : •••••Q.N., 03 - .' . Li'' i.:1.•:, // Ot C,A:HLIANS LANE • 02',A 1.00D COAT % 4' - . • ' CI fl • ....-' (t•V HALL - 2.__I-"t`_l • . •:. - •• I a ci.IL letn 5 ..- . i Ar--.7?, i ,, .-!-- - if, ... =. : I ....,-....... a: _Jr $101/S.. ',;:•4'. • ,...!---1------''-'.---- „,„ 4.4r s *Lb.:, .... ••.:,. /\411 -g.....-...f.4 1 ; , , II ` ''''''....s.'...*".../.....'.14. ''''. .. ... . • • •• • '7 • e Al' .-.... . s?:* ." r.........--.......„--.. h 2:' Planning Commission Minutes 8 January 14, 1985 • 1 E. ROBERTS LITHO, by Hoyt Development. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on 9.62 and Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into one lot for the construction of 107,000 square feet of office/warehouse in two buildings. Location: West of Mitchell Road, south of Highway #5. A public hearing. Mr. Brad Hoyt, Hoyt Development, reviewed the site features and proposed development characteristics with the Commission. He pointed out that the building would have a twelve-foot clear height, there would be screening of the parking and loading areas as shown in the sight sections in the plans, and that the rooftop mechanical units would be screened. He stated that the structure would have a lower profile than those existing in the surrounding . area. Mr. Hoyt expressed concern about the need for Technology Drive. He stated that his project could function without the extension of Technology Drive as access was currently available to the site without the extension. Mr. Hoyt suggested that perhaps the platting of the property could be left as a single lot at this time, instead, to allow him opportunity to discuss extension of the road with the Council prior to platting the right-of-way for the road extension with this phase of the project. Currently, Hoyt Development did not have immediate plans for development of the west portion of the parcel. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Staff Report of January 11, 1985, regarding the proposal. yGGG Planning Commission Minutes 9 January 14, 1985 The Commission concurred that the matter of development of the west portion of the property could be reviewed at a later date and stated that at the time of such review, the project would be reviewed based upon its own merits. Mr. Hoyt stated that he understood this. Chairman Beaman asked for comments and questions from members of the audience. There were none. MOTION 1: • Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to close the public hearing. • Motion carried--4-0-0 MOTION 2: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hoyt Development for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park for 4.62 acres for construction of an office/warehouse for Roberts Litho, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans dated December 20, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985. Motion carried--4-0-0 MOTION 3: Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Johannes, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hoyt Development for Preliminary Plat of 9.62 acres into one lot for office/warehouse use for Roberts Litho, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans dated December 20, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 11, 1985. ff Motion carried--4-0-0 To: Mayor and Council From: John D. Frane Date: January 31, 1985 Re: Re Housing Revenue Bonds for Tanager Creek $11,DDD,000 Resolution 85-48 Cheyene Land Company intends to construct 172 rental units in Tanager. It is our understanding that the project was presented as a "for sale" project when it was before the Planning Commission and the Council. Owners equity is indicated to be 25% at a total project cost of $14,650,00D. The property is zoned correctly for its intended use. Resolution 85-48 is included for your consideration. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA Application for Housing Revenue Bonds Under Chapter 426C, Minnesota Statutes 1. APPLICANT: a. Business Name Cheyenne Land Company b. Business Address 15500 Wayzata Blvd., #742 Wayzata, MN 55391 c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.) General Partnership d. State of Incorporation or Organization Minnesota e. Authorized Representative Richard Neslund f. Phone (612) 475-1700 2. NAMES(S) ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS: General Partners: a• Richard Neslund b• R. Neslund Co., a Minnesota Corporation, solely owned by Mabeth Neslund, wife of Richard Neslund -1- =q1G.R 3. GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS, PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS, ETC: Residential single and multi-family housing and land development 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: a. Location and Intended Use: Northwest and southwest quadrants on Baker Road (County Rd. 60) and Edenvale Boulevard in Eden Prairie for 172 rental housing units. b. Present Ownership of Project Site: Cheyenne Land Company c. Names and Addresses of Architect, Engineer, and General Contractor: Architect: Richard J. Carlson Engineer: McCombs-Knutsen, inc. General Contractor: Centurion Company 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT FOR: Land $ 2,000,000 Building 3 Equipment $ 11,495,000 Other - Legal and Underwriting Estimate $ 500,000 Debt Service Reserve Fund $ 605,000 TOTAL $ 14,650,000 ( I -2- 6. BOND ISSUE: a. Amount of Proposed Bond Issue $11,000,000 b. Proposed Date of Sale of Bond Early 1985 c. Length of Bond Issue and Proposed Maturities Approximate 11 yr. term in/serial maturities d. Proposed Original Purchaser of Bonds Miller-Schroeder Municipals, Inc. e. Name and Address of Suggested Trustee First Trust Company of St. Paul First National Bank Building St Paul, 55101 f. Copy of any Agreement Between Applicant and Original Purchaser See enclosed November 20, 1984 arrangement letter g. Describe any Interim Financing Sought or Available None h. Describe Nature and Amount of any Permanent Financing in Addition to Bond Financing Owner's equity of approximately $3,650,000 7. BUSINESS PROFILE OF APPLICANT: a. Are You Located in the City of Eden Prairie? 70 acre site owned since 1980 b. Number of Employees in Eden Prairie? i. Before this Project: None ii. During this Project: 100-200 construction workers iii. After this Project? 2 resident managers e. Approximate Annual Sales $5,500,000 in land lease and residential rental income d. Length of Time in Business? 13 years In Eden Prairie? None e. Do you Have Plants in Other Locations? If So Where? Yes - developments in Golden Valley, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Hopkins S Plymouth f. Are You Engaged in International Trade? No -3- cl6c 8. OTHER INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OR HOUSING REVENUE BOND PROJECT(S): a. List the name(s) and location(s) of other housing or industrial development project(s) in which the applicant is the owner or a "substantial user" of the facilities or a "related person" within the meaning of Section 103(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. Auburn Apts. (Hopkins); Fox Forest (Plymouth) b. List all cities in which the Applicant has requested industrial revenue development or housing bond financing. Hopkins and Plymouth, Minnesota c. Detail the status of any request the Applicant has before any other city for industrial development or housing revenue financing. This application constitutes only formal application in process. 1 d. List any city in which the Applicant has been refused industrial development or housing revenue financing. None e. List any city (and the project name) where the Applicant has acquired preliminary approval to proceed but in which final approval authorizing the financing has been denied. None f. If Applicant has been denied industrial development or housing revenue financing in any other city as indentified in (d) or (e), specify the reason(s) for the denial and the name(s) of appropriate city officials who have knowledge of the transaction. N/A 9. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF: a. Underwriter (If Public Offering) Miller-Schroeder Municipals, Inc. 2400 Northwestern Financial 7900 Xerxes Ave. So. Min�ela�olis, M�! 55h431 b. Private cemenC urc aser (If Private Placement) c. Bond Counsel Kutak, Rock & Campbell The Omaha Building 1650 Farman St. d. CorporrOa ehcounsel aska 68102 Estes Parsinen & Levy 700 Pillsbury Center 200 So. Sixth St. Minneapolis, MN 55402 e. Accountant McGiadrey, Hendrickson & Pulren 1300 Midwest Plaza East BOO Marquette Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4- yL7D 10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR: a. Construction Start Approximate $500,000 site preparation work completed - project expected • to start during 1985 construction season li • b. Construction Completion Approximately December 1987 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The undersigned Applicant understands that the approval or disapproval by the City of Eden Prairie for revenue bond financing under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, or adoption of a program thereunder, does not expressly or by implication constitute any approval, variance, or waiver of any provision or requirement relating to any zoning, building, or other rule or ordinance of the City of Eden Prairie, and any other law applicable to the property included in this project. Applicant . I CHEYENNE LAND COMPANY By } �j ✓ � z r.�.,/ A General Partner 0 i-f y- mac: /ei f Date } 11. ZONING - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT -5- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF INTENT RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF APPROXIMATELY $11,000,000 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS FOR THE TANAGER CREEK APARTMENT HOUSING PROJECT WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, particularly Minnesota Statutes Chapter 462C (the "Act"), to issue revenue obligations for the purpose of financing the construction or development of multifamily rental housing by the making of loans to mortgagors to finance the development of multifamily rental housing; and WHEREAS, the Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make such loans upon adoption of a program containing the information set forth in Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing held thereon and after approval thereof by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, as provided in the Act; and WHEREAS, Cheyenne Land Company, a general partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the sole general partners of which are Richard Neslund and R. Neslund Co., a corporation the sole shareholder of which is Mabeth Neslund, desires to develop, construct and equip multifamily rental housing which will result in increased residential opportunities within the City, which will be owned by Cheyenne Land Company; and WHEREAS, Cheyenne Land Company has acquired a parcel of real estate located on the northwest and southwest quadrants of Baker Road (County Road 60) and Edenvale Boulevard in Eden Prairie, Minnesota and will develop, construct and equip thereon a 172—unit housing project of which twenty percent (20%) of the units will be reserved for persons of low and moderate income to be known as the Tanager Creek Apartments Project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, as an inducement to Cheyenne Land Company to develop, construct and equip the Project, the City desires to adopt this Resolution; and WHEREAS, before revenue obligations of the City may be issued, it is necessary to conduct a public hearing on the proposal to issue the revenue obligations, all as required and provided by The Federal Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Aet of 1982; and WHEREAS, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota is an experienced municipal bond underwriter and has structured the proposed financing for the City at the request of Cheyenne Land Company; and WHEREAS, it is apparent that the development of the Project will increase the number of residential units and provide needed, decent, safe and sanitary housing in the City, all of which are in the public interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the financing of the proposed Project through the issuance of the hereinafter described Bonds of the City will increase the assessed valuation of the City and further provide for and promote the public health, safety, morals and welfare of the inhabitants of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, as follows: Section 1. It is hereby found and determined that it would be in the best interest of the City to issue the bonds under the Act and to finance the costs of the Project relating to the development, construction and equipping of the Tanager Creek Apartments Project to be located within the boundaries of the City. Section 2. The City Council hereby establishes its intent to adopt a housing program for the Project as required by the Act and to issue its multifamily housing development revenue bonds (the "Bonds") in the approximate amount of $11,000,000 for the purpose of making a permanent loan to be evidenced by a loan agreement to Cheyenne Land Company to provide financing for the development, construction and equipping of the Project, to fund a bond debt service reserve fund and to pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds; provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be issued until the housing program of the City has been adopted and approved in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Section 3. As an inducement to Cheyenne Land Company to develop, construct and equip said Project, the City Council, the Mayor and other employees and officers of the City shall cooperate and take such action as may be necessary in the drafting of documents or the performance of such other acts as will facilitate the issuance of the Bonds by the City and the development, construction and equipping of the Project. Section 4. Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. is hereby appointed Underwriter for the proposed financing, and all fees and expenses thereof shall be paid solely from proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, payments made by Cheyenne Land Company or by the purchase of the Bonds at a discount. Section 5. Any costs or expenses of the City incurred in connection with the Project shall be reimbursed from either the proceeds of the Bonds to be issued with respect thereto or from payments by other parties to the financing. Section 6. The City Council hereby agrees that a public hearing shall he conducted on the proposal to issue the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of federal tax law and all residents within the City who appear st such hearing shall be given an opportunity to express their views for or against the Project and the proposal to issue the Bonds. -2- U(, The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish one time, not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date fixed or such hearing, in a newspaper published and having a general circulation within the City, a Notice of Intention to Issue Multifamily Housing Development Revenue Bonds in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 7. The obligation hereunder of the City and its City Concil shall be limited solely to good-faith efforts to consummate the proceedings contemplated by this Resolution and to issue the Bonds, and neither the City nor its City Council nor its officers, agents or employees shall incur any liability whatsoever if for reasons beyond the control of the City and its City Council the proposed issuance of the Bonds cannot be consummated. Section 8. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie. Section 9. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the bond as requested by the applicant. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the bond should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the bond or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. Section 10. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that by December 31, 1985, the City and the applicant shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Revenue Agreement, the Bonds and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time, this Resolution shall expire an be of no further effect. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of , 1985 by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Eden Prairie. Mayor Attest: City Clerk -3- qtA�� FEBRUARY 5,1985 17973 VOID OUT CHECK 50.00- .f 18324 AFTON ALPS SKI AREA SKI TRIP/FEES PD 431.00 I"'25 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO INSURANCE 762.93 6 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN INSURANCE 12835.69 18327 MEUCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE 5184.05 a. 18328 -GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE 2014.30 18329 ASHLEY'S TREE SERVICE INC TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 1695.00 • 18330 PENZEL RECOGNITION COMMITEE EXPENSES 60.00 18331 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 7346.71 18332 MINNESOTA GAS CO SERVICE 6920.E6 18333 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1465.58 18334 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1146.92 j. 18335 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 5112.86 18336 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 1130.75 18337 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4285.58 18338 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE 173.60 18339 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 739.74 18340 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 677.40 18341 SOUTHWEST SNOWMOBILE TRAIL ASSOC SERVICE - SNOWMOBILE TRAILS 2092.27 18342 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERY 39.00 18343 LINDA ROBLE REFUND-GOOD COMPANY TRIP 5.00 18344 MARLEEN CARTER REFUND-GOOD COMPANY TRIP 5.00 18345 STATE OF THE REGION CONFERENCE-CITY HALL 26.00 18346 MINNESOTA URBAN TRAFFIC ENG COUNC CONFERENCE-ENG DEPT 20.00 18347 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 143.93 18348 GREG MUELLER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 50.00 I8349 WENDY BURNS CARLSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 353.00 : '50 KRISTIN SCHWECKE REFUND-SWIM•ING CLASSES 3.75 ,_,,51 SHAP.N BUSHNELL REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 13.10 18352 RADISSON HOTEL ST PAUL CONFERENCE - COUNCIL MEMBER 50.00 18353 I+ATTHEW LEVI REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00 18354 JUDY WALSTAD REFUND-PRENATAL CLASSES 23.00 18355 BRIAN COLLINS REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00 18356 LISA COLLINS REFUND -SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00 I8357 LINDA TRAPP REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 20.00 18358 LESLIE KREBSBACH REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 13.00 18359 MIKE ZIEGELWEYER REFUND-RACQUETBALL CLASSES 46.00 18360 LAURA ESMOND REFUND - SWIMMING CLASSES 3.75 18361 BUCK HILL SKI TRIP/FEES PD 462.00 18362 ETHNIC DANCE THEATRE DANCE PERFORMANCE-COMMUNITY SERVICES/FEES 700.00 18363 JOHN MYERS REFUND-SKI TRIP 5.50 • 18364 CHRIS HOUGHTON REFUND-SKI TRIP 5.50 I83G5 GTS CONFERENCE-COUNCIL MEMBER • 80.00 • 18366 WINNESO1A GAS CO SERVICE 12256.93 15367 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 14021.24 18368 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 14844.41 18369 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE DECEMBER 84 SALES TAX 20040.7•r' ' 18370 HLNNLPIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE-COUNCIL MEMBERS 16.0s 18371 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1566.6W 18372 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4565.9'., 18373 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 133.17 18374 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 402.41. 175 I%ILRCON1 iN1Ni L PCKG CO WINE 238.6 16376 JOWLSV3 I;LOII ::S WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 1958.w. 18377 GRIGGS COOPLR R CO INC LIQUOR 3465.6I, )2963353 • • FEBRUARY 5,1985 '73 VOID OUT CHECK 50.01' ''.,,s24 AFTON ALPS SKI AREA SKI TRIP/FEES PD 431.00 18325 WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO INSURANCE 762.98 18326 PHYSICIANS HEWN PLAN INSURANCE 12835.6:' 18327 MEOCEOTERS HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE 5184.0 18328 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC INSURANCE 2014.30 18329 ASHLEY'S TREE SERVICE INC TREES-FORESTRY DEPT 1695.0o 18330 PENZEL RECOGNITION COMMITEE EXPENSES 60.00 18331 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO .. SERVICE 7346.7]. 18332 MINNESOTA GAS CO SERVICE 6920.96 18333 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1465.58 18334 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1146.9? 18335 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 5112.86 18336 TWIN CITY WINE CO WINE 1130.7r ' 18337 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4285.58 18338 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE 173.60 18339 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 739.71 18340 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 677.40 16341 SOUTHWEST SNOWMOBILE TRAIL ASSOC SERVICE - SNOWMOBILE TRAILS 2092.27 18342 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERY 39.00 18343 LINDA ROBLE REFUND-GOOD COMPANY TRIP 5.00 18344 MARLEEN CARTER REFUND-GOOD COMPANY TRIP 5.00 18345 STATE OF THE REGION CONFERENCE-CITY HALL 26.00 18346 MINNESOTA URBAN TRAFFIC ENG COUNC CONFERENCE-ENG DEPT 20.00 18347 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 143.93 • 348 GREG MUELLER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 50.00 18349 WENDY BURNS CARLSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 353.00 18350 KRISTIN SCH1IECKE REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 3.75 'j 18351 SHAWN BUSHNELL REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 13.10 18352 RAOISSON HOTEL ST PAUL CONFERENCE - COUNCIL MEMBER 50.00 18353 MATTHEW LEVI REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00 18354 JUDY WALSTAD REFUND-PRENATAL CLASSES 23.00 18355 BRIAN COLLINS REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00 ' 18356 LISA COLLINS REFUND -SWIMMING CLASSES 10.00 18357 LINDA TRAPP REFUND-EXERCISE CLASSES 20.00 18358 LESLIE KREBSBACH REFUND-SWIMMING CLASSES 13.00 18359 MIKE ZIECELMEYER REFUND-RACQUETBALL CLASSES 46.00 18360 LAURA ESMOND REFUND - SWIMMING CLASSES 3.75 18361 BUCK HILL SKI TRIP/FEES PD 462.0C 18362 ETHNIC DANCE THEATRE DANCE PERF080ANCE-COMMUNITY SERVICES/FEES 700.00 I8363 JOHN MYERS REFUND-SKI TRIP 5.50 18364 CHRIS HOUGHTON REFUND-SKI TRIP 5.50 18365 GTS CONFERENCE-COUNCIL MEMBER 80.00 18366 MINNESOTA GAS CO SERVICE 12256.93 18367 NORTHERN SLATES POWER CO SERVICE 14021.2; 18368 NORTHERN STATES PO'ILR CO SERVICE 14844.41 18369 0000ISSI000R OF REVENUE DECEMBER 84 SALES TAX 20040.7: 18370 HENNEPIN COUNTY PAR ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE-COUNCIL MEMBERS 16.0E 18371 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 1566.6: : 'R372 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 4565.91, .373 LADLE WINE CO WINE 133.17 13374 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 402.4t 18375 INTERCONIINENTAI. PCKG CO WINE 238.0:' 18376 JO;IWSON MINERS 0001.ESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR 1958. , 18377 CHIGGS COOPER & Co INC LIQUOR 3465.E 12963353 00 18378 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE EXPENSES 55.58 18379 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERY JANUARY 25TH 26.Oc 18380 mu DEPT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 30.v 'I 81 LANCE ENTERPRISES 10 TRANSFORMERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 250.0c „s82 PETTY CASH POSTAGE-CITY HALL 10.00 18383 A COMMERCIAL DOOR COMPANY REPAIR GARAGE DOOR - P/W BLDG 89.28 18384 A•& H WELDING & MFG CO STEEL-WATER DEPT 10.15 18385 ACME TYPEWRITER INC TYPEWRITER REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 170.00 18386 ACTION RENTAL CENTERS EQUIPMENT RENTAL-CITY HALL 20.80 18387 STUART ALEXANDER JANUARY 85 MILEAGE 36.50 18388 AMERICANNA VENTURES INC EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 34.57 18389 AMI PRODUCTS INC HOSE COUPLINGS 253.43 18390 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC WARNING SIGNS/STREET SIGNS 827.50 `. 18391 ARMOR SECURITY INC REPAIR LOCKS-COMMUNITY SERVICES 75.00 18392 AT & T INFORMATIDN SYSTEMS SERVICE 18.30 18393 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICE 892.00 18394 ATLAS PILE DRIVING CO LOG SKIDDER RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1800.00 18395 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -OIL FILTERS/BATTERIES/WIPER BLADES- 257.46 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 18396 B R W INC SERVICE 32080.77 18397 BOE ENGINEERING SERVICE - LORENCE WAY 200.00 1839E DONNA BOLLER UNIFORM-POLICE DEPT 19.95 18399 BILL BONNER REFUND-WATER & SEWER BILL 108.48 18400 LEE BRANDT HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 62.00 18401 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC SHELVES-POLICE DEPT 254.29 I8402 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 299.30 18403 CABRIOLE OFFICE CETNER REFUND-WATER & SEWER BILLS 982.9E 1 404 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-STREET DEPT 1035.24 :05 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO REPAIR COOLER-LIQUOR STORE 89.75 I 18406 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 360.00 18407 BILL CARROLL -VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL & OPEN GYM OFFICIAL 220.00 FEES PAID 18408 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SERVICE-LAKE. ANN INTERCEPTOR ALIGNMENT 271.75 18409 RICHARD B OGILVIE TRUSTEE OF THE SERVICE-BIRCH ISLAND ROAD 5372.81 18410 COLE PUBLICATIONS BOOK-POLICE DEPT 144.00 18411 COMMERCE/NOAA/NCDC SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT 5.20 18412 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 363.33 18413 JEFF CONRADI HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 75.00 18414 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC -GAS DETECTOR EQUIPMENT/BATTERY CHARGER- 1427.70 FIRE DEPT 18415 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY INC SMOKE EJECTOR FAN-FIRE DEPT 425.00 18416 COPY EQUIPMENT INC XEROX VELLUM/SCALE-PARK PLANNING 60.25 18417 CUB SCOUT PACK P422 RABIES CLINIC REIMBURSEMENT 24.50 18418 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS INC FOLDING PLATFORM/DELUGE GUN/GAUGE-FIRE DPT 2285.0E 18419 CUTLER MAGN'ER CO QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 1958.13 18420 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 32.64 18421 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO WATER METER PARTS 687.72 18422 CRAIG I:' DAWSON EXPENSES 40.45 18423 TIM DUNSMORE HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 75.00 i 18424 STEVEN C DURHAM EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 3.25 18425 JOY EASTMAN EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 10.08 18426 THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC SUBSCRIPTION-MANAGER BOOK-POLICE DEPT 129.81 -427 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO REPAIR CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS 223.6u 428 EL MARKETING 30 VOTING BOOTHS - ELECTION EQUIPMENT 5880.91 6006544 y,)1 18429 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEM INC REPLACE STROBE LIGHT-POLICE DEPT 2041.00 18430 CHRIS ENGER JANUARY 1985 EXPENSES 165.00 18431 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 262.00 ( 32 FART:ER, STEEL CO STEEL PIPE-COMMUNITY CENTER 61.37 1„.33 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MN BOOKS-FIRE DEPT 91.80 18434 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY MIXES-LIQUOR STORES 441.60 18435 GENERAL. COMMUNICATIONS INC RADI0 REPAIR & PARTS 893.44 18436 GNERER WELDING INC BLADE FOR SNOW PLOW-P/S DEPT 49.50 18437 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY 8310.00 18438 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTERS 16 TIRES-STREET DEPT 925.76 18439 GOPHER OIL COMPANY OIL-WATER DEPT 188.10 18440 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC REMODEL COUNCIL CHAMBERS-CITY HALL 181.57 18441 HARMON GLASS REPAIR SIDE MIRROR-STREET DEPT 28.72 18442 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR BLOCK-WATER DEPT 126.62 18443 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE 1985 DUES-POLICE DEPT 50.00 18444 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 2130.00 18445 HENNEPIN COUNTY DECEMBER 84 BOARD OF PRISONERS 1817.00 18446 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER -EQUIPMENT RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT/SERVICE- 12358.1E VALLEY VIEW ROAD 18447 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT DECEMBER 84 BOOKING FEES 68.55 18448 D C HEY CO INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR -BLDG DEPT 141.19 18449 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC SKATE SHARPENER-COMMUNITY CENTER 4175.00 18450 HOYT DEVELOPMENT REFUND IDR DEPOSIT -TECHNOLOGY PARK 27000.00 18451 IMI RESEARCH CORPORATION -COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY- 1715.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES 18452 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 -DECEMBER 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE/SUPPLIES- 1686.74 COMMUNITY SERVICES 1R453 INGMAN LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS - WATER DEPT 343.00 54 IBM SERVICE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 813.00 18455 IBM SERVICE AGREEMENT ON TYPEWRITERS-CITY HALL 1347.00 18456 IBM SERVICE AGREEMENT - POLICE DEPT 186.00 18457 IBM 2 TYPEWRITERS - POLICE DEPT 2280.00 18458 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES - WATER DEPT 132.78 18459 JAK OFFICE PRODUCTS CO OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 30.41 18460 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES - WATER DEPT 43.82 1 18461 JEFFREY T JOHNSON BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 212.50 18462 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES 36.94 1 18463 AMERICAN FREIGHT FREIGHT CHARGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 85.75 18464 JUSTUS LUMBER CO LUMBER-POLICE OEPT 257.40 18465 KARULF IIARDWARE INC GLUE/CAN OPENER/HINGES/LETTERS/KEYS/TAPE 72.96 18466 KATE KARNAS SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT 19.05 18467 KROY INC KROY TAPE-POLICE DEPT 342.00 1846E LABEL PRODUCTS INC 911 STICKERS-POLICE DEPT 600.16 18469 LANCE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 80.02 18470 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD NOVEMBER 84 LEGAL SERVICE 13886.7O 18471 DOUGLAS A LAWYER BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00 18472 MARKSMAN FLOOR & CARPET CLEANING CLEAN LIQUOR STORE CARPETS 167.00 1S473 TOM MANARIN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60.00 16474 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC REFUND MIDB DEPOSIT 4000.00 18475 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES 70.24 18476 NCI CELLCOA MOBILE RADIO SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 137.94 I8477 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 48.36 ''17B MPICII;E lAKE LINES BUS SERVICE-CC:MUNITY SERVICES 400.00 479 Y,LTRO AL000 INC 1ST QUARTER 85 ALARM SYSTEM-P/W BLDG 54.00 9065517 . • 18480 METROPOLITAN AREA MGMT ASSOC 1985 DUES 5.00 18481 METROPOLITAN WASIE CONTROL COMM DECEMRER 84 SAC CHARGES 78680.25 12 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 151.50 1'8483 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO SUBSCRIPTION-CITY HALL 29.90 18484 MPLS STAR & TRIBUNE CO EMPLOYMENT AD-ASSESSING DEPT 91.80 • 18485 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 41.55 18486 MN POLICE & PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC 1985 DUES-POLICE DEPT 250.00 18487 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC BASKETBALL REGISTRATIONS/FEES PAID 270.D0 18488 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC VOLLEYBALL REGISTRATIONS/FEES PAID 375.00 18489 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSN DUES-COMMUNITY SERVICES 70.00 18490 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL INC DUES-CITY HALL 75.00 18491 MN STATE FIRE DPI ASSOC 1985 DUES-FIRE DEPT 165.00 18492 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 91.00 18493 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC ADS-LIQUOR STORES 84.00 18494 GREG MUELLER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 150.00 18495 JEFF NELSON BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 300.DD I 18496 NOREN PRODUCTS INC RED BUMPER LIGHTS-POLICE DEPT 638.94 18497 NORMAR INVESTBETNS REFUND 14I08 DEPOSIT 7500.00 '' 18498 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO SERVICE 130.33 18499 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC COMPUTER/DISK DRIVE/PRINTER-FINANCE DEPT 3404.00 18500 HARRY A ORTLOFF HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 51.00 18501 LYNN PEAVEY CO ENVELOPES-POLICE DEPT 35.76 18502 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 16.31 18503 PENNSYLVANIA OIL CO OIL-STREET DEPT 341.00 18504 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINT FORMS-COMMUNITY SERVICES 113.75 18505 PRAIRIE VILLAGE PET HOSPITAL RABIES CLINIC 343.00 )' O6. PRENTICE-HALL INC BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT 69.70 J7 RADIO SHACK INTERCOM-P/W BUILDING 139.90 18508 DAVE RANDALL BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 237.50 18509 RC IDENTIFICATIONS TAGS-POLICE DEPT 140.4D 18510 REYNOLDS PRINTING INC REFUNO MIDB DEPOSIT 14000.00 18511 RIDGE DOOR SALES CO OF MN INC REPAIR GARAGE DOOR-P/S BUILDING 69.69 18512 KAREN RINTA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00 185I3 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO PUMP RENTAL-STREET DEPT 506.88 18514 RO01-0-MATIC SEWER SERVICE SERVICE-MOUNT CURVE 65.00 18515 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS STAMPS-CITY HALL 53.00 18516 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO DESK-BUILDING DEPT 219.80 18517 KENT SANDWESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 15.00 18518 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES INC PORTABLE RESTROOMS-PARK DEPT 913.17 18519 ERIC SAUCER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 250.00 15520 MAURA SCHI.IIDTLEIN SNOWTUBING/FEES PAID 28.38 1652I STEVEN R SINELL FEBRUARY 85 EXPENSES 171.00 18522 KARY SMITH BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 32.00 18523 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP TOOLS-STREET DEPT 259.56 18524 SNAP PRINT-WEST FORMS-POLICE DEPT 113.76 18525 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 11.19 18526 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN FIRE LEAGUE 1985 DUES-FIRE DEPT 25.00 I 18527 SPECIALTY SCREENING FIRE EMBIFMS/PEAQUES-FIRE DEPT 530.50 I8528 STATE TREASURER 4TH QUARTER 84 BUILDING PERMIT CHARGES 14251.56 15529 STATE TREASURER 1984 WATER USE REPORT 250.00 18530 DON STREICHER GUNS GUN SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 47.00 • 31 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1985 NEW SQUAD CAR 10655.79 '._.,32 SUUUROAN RAZE AUTHORITY 1985 DUES 1472.40 16533 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC PUMP TANK-RESEARCH ROAD 50.00 13804427 y')3 . r • 18534 TAYLORS MANUFACTURING BUDDY BUMPER-POLICE DEPT 117.17 .)R535 TURF SUPPLY CO FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE 6120.2' 536 TURNQUIST PAPER CO TOILET PAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER 418.7i 18537 VESSCO INC PAINT-4IA1ER DEPT 40.05 18538 VIKING LABORATJRIES INC CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER 159.00 18539 VIKING'PRESS INC LETTERHEAD-CITY HALL 478.0,' 18540 WALL STREET JOURNAL 1985 SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 107.0E 18541 WATER PRODUCTS CO -24 REMOTES/TWO 2" METERS $1245.00/14 6254.32 1 1/2" METERS $4060.00 18542 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE 65.03 18543 WEST WELD STEEL-STREET DEPT 42.35 18544 MASON WEYER TEEN WORK PROGRAM WAGES 62.40 18545 TOM WHALEN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 30.00 18546 JOE WIETHOFF VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 50.00 18547 RICK WILLIAMS EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 63.00 18548 WINGFIELD PERFORMANCE REPAIR AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 295.0U 18549 XEROX CORP SERVICE 22I2.O 18550 ZACKS INC PUMP/HAMMER/FLOOR DRY 177.4C 18551 ZIEGLER INC FUEL LINE/AIR FILTER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 134.32 18552 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 1/25/85 20028.33 18553 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 1/25/85 10585.89 18554 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 1/25/85 15151,3C 18555 UNITED WAY OF MPLS PAYROLL 1/25/85 117.81 18556 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 1/25/85 37.50 s 18557 PERA PAYROLL 1/25/85' 27.00 18558 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY CO PAYROLL 1/25/85 120.00 '559 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 1/25/85 35.00 .,561) GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 1/25/85 4277.00 18561 PERA PAYROLL 1/25/85 16664.25 18562 STATE TREASURER PERMIT FEE-PARK DEPT 30.00 8390022 • $502298.63 C • /!7g February 5, 1985 ...n Disbursements by Fund number 10 GENERAL 232054.24 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEPT 15645.79 15 LIQUOR STORE—P V M 25394.40 17 LIDUOR STORE—PRESERVE 19510.75 33 UTILITY POND FUND 271.75 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 30534.25 57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 10647.13 73 WATER FUND 105199.19 77 SEWER FUND 228.59 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 54981.13 90 TAX INCREMENT FUND 7831.41 $502298.63 • t/�S • r t MEMORANDUM • ¢¢ TO: Mayor and City Council • Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services T`v :1 DATE: January 29, 1985 SUBJECT: Appointment of Members to Ad Hoc Committee to Study Projected Five Year Capital Improvement Needs Within the City of Eden Prairie • In the later part of 1984, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission received several requests from the community to consider expansion and addition of a variety of recreation facilities within the City. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed requests from various athletic associations and information provided by City staff, and finally in November of 1984 recommended that the City Council appoint an ad hoc committee to study capital improvement projects within the City that might require referendums within the next five years. • The Commission suggested that this study not be limited to possible City referendums, but that potential school needs also be addressed. The Commission felt that it was important to have people on an ad hoc committee that would represent all of the concerns being discussed so the timing of any one of the referendums would not • conflict with one another, and that representatives of each special interest under- ( stand the needs of the various agencies, associations, etc, _ In December of 1984, the City Council authorized City staff to contact the various athletic associations within the community, as well as the school district to ask for representatives to serve on an ad hoc committee. The following list of 15 • representatives have been submitted for this ad hoc committee: 1. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission - Moe Cook 2. Planning Commission - Bob Hallett 3. School District - Merle Gamin 4. School Athletic Facilities Committee - Curt Connaughty 5. Chamber of Commerce - Fred lioisington G. Baseball Association - Gary Soderberg 7. Figure Skating Club - Lonnie Anderson • 8. Football Association - Jim Ostenson • 9. Girl's Athletic Association (Girl's Basketball - John honntla) 10. Mickey Association - John Reedy 11, Soccer Association - Rob Woodcock 12. Soccer Club - John Parringlon l/76 -g 13. Basketball Association - Gene Haberman 14. Girl's Athletic Association (Girl's Softball - Larry Schuster) 15. Steve Rux - Swim Club The City staff that will work with this committee are: Craig Dawson, Jack Hacking, Chuck Pappas, Stuart Alexander, and Bob Lambert. Upon approval of these appointments by the City Council, City staff would call a meeting for sometime in mid-February. At that meeting, the committee would appoint a chairman and decide on a regular meeting schedule. Staff has set a goal that this committee report back to the City Council in late April or early May with a list of proposed capital improvement projects, estimated costs and the priority over the next five year period. To date, the City staff have received a great deal of positive feedback from the community regarding this joint effort to study the needs of our growing community. BL:md • ( • • • 77