HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/08/1985EDEN PRAIRIE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 485
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION
BOARDROOM
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Patricia Pidcock, and
Paul Redpath
City Manager Carl J. Jullie; Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson; City
Attorney Roger Pauly; Finance Director
John Frane; Planning Director Chris
Enger; Director of Community Services
Robert Lambert; Director of Public
Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Karen Michael
I. SWEARING IN CEREMONIES FOR MAYOR GARY PETERSON AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
GEORGE BENTLEY AND PATRICIATTUEOCK
II. RESOLUTION DECLARING MONDAY JANUARY 21 1985 "WOLF PENZEL DAY" IN
fUN PRAIRIE Resolution No.—g:271
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
IV. MINUTES
A. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, October j 1984
B. Special City Council meeting held Thursday, December 20 1984
V. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Black & Veatch contract for desion services for water system
expansion
B. Final plat, Flying Cloud Center 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 85-
C. Final plat, Promontou Ridge (Resolution No . 85-14)
D. Final plat, The Preserve Commercial Park South (Resolution No.
85-15)
Pg. 1
Pg. 2
Pg. 13
Pg. 14
Pg. 36
Pg. 39
Pg. 42
E. AXEL DENTAL OFFICE, by Richard C. Axel. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
#129-84, Amending Ordinance #82-03, within the Office Zoning for a
Dental Office and Adoption of Resolution #85-1, Setting Conditions
of Approval for Axel Dental Clinic. Location: Southwest quadrant
of Highway ;5 and County Road #4.(Ordinance #129-84, Amending
Ordinance #824)3; Resolution #85-1, Summary Resolution for
Developm:.nt Approval)
Pg 45
City Council Agenda
- 2 - Tues.,January 8, 1985
F. CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #131-84, Amending
Ordinance 178-33, within the Public Zoning District for Church
Expansion to Christ Lutheran Church on 2.78 acres and Adoption of
Resolution #85-2, Setting Conditions of Approval for Christ
Lutheran Church. Location: 7800 Carnelian Way. (Ordinance #131-
84, Amending Ordinance #78-33; Resolution #85-2, Summary
Resolution for Development Approval)
G. LAKE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, by Lake Heights Ventures. 2nd Reading
of Ordinance #130-84, Amending Ordinance #79-04, from RM-6.5 to
RI- 13.5 for 1.85 acres into four single family residential lots,
and Adoption of Resolution #85-3, Setting Conditions of Approval
for Lake Heights 2nd Addition. Location: Southeast quadrant of
Homeward Hills Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. (Ordinance #130-
84, amending Ordinance #79-04 Rezoning from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5;
Resolution #85-3, Summary Resolution for Development Approval)
H. YOUNGSTEDT SERVICE CENTER, by the Preserve. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance #133-84, Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial
Regional Service for 0.89 acres for an auto service center and
Adoption of Resolution #85-4, Setting Conditions of Approval for
Youngstedt Service Center. Location: Southeast quadrant of
Highway #169 and Medcom Boulevard. (Ordinance #133-84, Rezoning
from Rural to Commercial Regional Service; Resolution #85-4,
Summary Resolution for Development Approval)
I. ROCKY ROCOCO PIZZA, by the Preserve. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
MT-84, Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional
Service for 1.53 acres for a restaurant and and Adoption of
Resolution #85-5, Setting Conditions of Approval for Rocky Rococo
Pizza. Location: Southeast quadrant of Highway #169 and Medcom
Boulevard. (Ordinance #136-84, Rezoning from Rural to Commercial
Regional Service; Resolution #85-5, Summary Resolution for
Development Approval)
J. REYNOLDS PRINTING. 2nd Reading of Ordinance #134-84-PUD-13-84,
Request for Planned Unit Development District Review and Rezoning
from Rural to 1-2 for three acres for an office/manufacturing/
warehouse facility and Approval of Amendment to Developer's
Agreement for Edenvale 9th Addition for Reynolds Printing;
Adoption of Resolution #85-6, Approving Summary of Ordinance #134-
84-PUD-13-84, and Ordering Publication of said Summary. Location:
Southeast quadrant of Valley View Road and Mitchell Road.
(Ordinance #134-84-PUD-13-84 Planned Unit Development District
Review and Rezoning from Rural to 1-2; Resolution #85-6, Summary
Resolution for Development Approval)
K. EDENVALE EXECUTIVE PARK, by Welsh Construction. 2nd Reading of
#135-84-PUD-14-84, Planned Unit Development District Review and
Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 for approximately 9.0 acres and
Approval of Amendment to Developer's Agreement for Edenvale 9th
Addition for Edenvale Executive Park; Adoption of Resolution #85-
7, Approving Summary of Ordinance #135-84-PU0-14-84, and Ordering
Publication of said Summary. Location: Southeast quadrant of
Valley View Road and Mitchell Road. (Ordinance #135-84-P(jD-14-84
Planned Unit Development District Review and Rezoning from Rural
to 1-2; Resolution #85-7, Summary Resolution for Development
Approval)
Pg. 49
Pg. 55
Pg. 61
Pg. 64
Pg. 67
Pg. 71
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,January 8, 1985
Pg. 2783 L. 2ND READING PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ADVERTISING SIGN DISTRICT AND
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC DISTRICT DEFINITION (Ordinance No.
137-84)
M. Clerk's License List
N. Resolution No. 85-16 designating the Official City Newspaper
O. Resolution No. 85-17 authorizing City Officials to transact
banking business
P. Resolution No. 85-18 authorizing use of facsimile signatures 121
Public Officials
Q. Resolution No. 85-19 designating depositories
R. Resolution No. 85-20 authorizing the treasurer to invest City of
Eden Prairie funds
S. NORTH BAY OF TIMBER LAKES 2ND ADDITION, by Richard Miller Homes.
2nd Reading of Ordinance #140-84, Amending Ordinance #326 within
the RM-2.5 Zoning District for eight multiple fmaily units and
Adoption of Resolution #85-23, Setting Conditions of Approval for
North Bay of Timber Lakes 2nd Addition. Location: Northwest
quadrant of County Road #4 and Timber Lakes Drive. (Ordinance
#140-84, Amending Ordinance #326 within RM-2.5 Zoning District;
Resolution #85-23, Summary Resolution for Development Approval
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. APPENDIX E. A Public Hearing to discuss AppEndix E, an optional
I appendix to the State Building Code, which would permit the City
of Eden Prairie to exceed the current requirements of •the State
Building Code in respect to the installation of automatic fire
suppression systems. (Ordinance No. 138-84) Continued from
December 18, 1984
owl t. (.)
CARDINAL CREEK VILLAGE, by Chimo Development Corporation. Request
for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Environmental
Assessment Worksheet for 280 units of multiple family development
on 40.7 acres. Location: North of Cardinal Creek, east of Baker
Road. (Resolution No. 85-8 - PUD Concept Approval)
VII. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 17740 17811. 17812 - 18055
VIII. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 85-09, designating the official meeting dates, time
and place for the City of Eden Prairie Council members in 1985
and appointing an Acting Mayor
B. Resolution No. 85-lh Authorization to acquire Tax Forfeited Lands
X. APPOINTMENTS
A. Metropolitan League of Municipalities - Appointment of 1
Representative and 4 Alternates
Pg. 75
Pg. 76
Pg. 78
Pg. 79
Pg. 80
Pg. 81
Pg. 82
Pg. 2780 &
Pg. 87A
Pg. 88
Pg. 149
Pg. 158
Pg. 159
City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,January 8, 1985
,,' Health Officer - Appointment of 1 Health Officer for the year
' 1985. Appointmentby Mayor with consent of Council.
. :South Hennepin Human Services Council - Appointment of 2 Consumer
Representatives to serve 2 year terms commencing 2/1/85
0.2WAFTA Board (Western Area Fire Training Association) - Appointment
of 1 Representative to serve a 1-year term commencing 1/1/85
X. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
XI. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
XII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A.
B.
Reports of Council Members
Raport of City Manager z/i/ AAef 44-
1. Proposed Employee/benefits changes
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Community Services
1. Bryant Lake Park Capital Improvement Program
NEW BUSINESS
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
Pg. 168
Pg. 169
RESOLUTION NO. 85-22
A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING JANUARY 21 1985 TO BE
'WOLF PENZEL DAY'
IN THE CITTWEGEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Wolfgang H. Penzel has served countless dedicated hours of
service to the City of Eden Prairie as:
Mayor, 1977 - 1984
Council Member, 1973 - 1976
Member, Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission,
1973 - 1975
Member, Human Rights & Services Commission, 1970 - 1972
and,
WHEREAS, Wolf Penzel has served his community in many other forums,
Including membership on the Boards of:
Suburban Public Health Nursing Service
Municipal Legislative Commission
South Hennepin Transportation Task Force
and,
WHEREAS, Wolf Penzel has been one of the key leaders of the City during
the past twelve years, a period of time in which the population of the City
more than doubled to 23,000 and $850 million in new construction occurred; and
WHEREAS, Wolf Penzel demonstrated visionary leadership by proposing a
series of improvements and financing plan for completing much-needed roads and
bridges in the City's Major Center Area, the fruits of which are beginning to
be seen with numerous and diverse high-quality developments being constructed
in that area; and
WHEREAS, Wolf Penzel, by encouraging residents to make known their
concerns, has listened well to his constitutents and has eloquently
represented them at all levels of government; and
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie community is Sincerely appreciative of the
contributions made by Wolf Penzel,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Eden Prairie City Council does hereby proclaim
JANUARY 21, 1985
as
"WOLF PENZEL DAY"
IN EDEN PRAIRIE
Adopted by the Eden Prairie City Council this 8th day of January, 1985.
Mayor Gary O. Peterson
Councilman Richard Anderson
Councilman George Bentley Council Mem5T-Patricia Pidcock
Councilman Paul Redpath
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16. 1984
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
INVOCATION: Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present
7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BOARDROOM
Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson, Geory
Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the Cit
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Finance Director John D. Frane, Planning Directo
Chris Enger, Director of Community Services Rober
Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz.
and Recording Secretary Karen Michael
I. COMMENDATION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY K-9 OFFICERS JANET KOCH, JAMES MATSON & RICK
RABENORT
Mayor Penzel presented Letters of Commendation to Public Safety K-9 Officers
Janet Koch, James Matson and Rick Rabenort for their outstanding accomplish-
ments at the recent National Canine Competition in Lima, Ohio. Also present
were their dogs Major, Hawkeye and Buck. Director of Public Safety Hacking
introduced Allen Hancock of the Minneapolis Police Department who has helped
with the training of the dogs; Hacking presented Hancock with a plaque. Penzel
thanked the officers for their work and congratulated them on behalf of the
residents of Eden Prairie.
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
The following item was added to the Consent Calendar as III. Q. Authorization
of DNR Permit for Anderson Lakes Parkway.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to approve the Agenda and Other
Items of Business as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 115-84, amending City Code Sec. 1.05 relating
to salaries of Mayor and Council members
City Council Minutes -2- October 16, 1984
B. Clerk's License List
C. SHADY OAK RIDGE by Joseph Ruzic. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 112-84,
rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, approval of Developer's Agreement for Shady
Oak Ridge; and adoption of Resolution No. 84-250, approving Summary of Ordin-
ance Nb. 112-84 and ordering publication of said Summary for Shady Oak Ridge.
11.5 acres for 36 townhouse units. Location: north of Rowland Road, west
of Old Shady Oak Road.
D. LEARNING TREE/MINNESOTA TREE 2ND ADDITION. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No.
108-84, rezoning from Rural to Commercial-Regional-Service for Learning Tree,
and adoption of Resolution No. 84-273 approving Development Plan for Learning
Tree. 1.07 acres for day care center. Location: southeast quadrant of
Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road.
E. Final Plat approval for Research Farm First Addition (Resolution No. 84-278)
F. Change Order No. 1, I.C. 52-064, Flying Cloud Drive Improvements
G. Change Order No, 1, LC, 52-059, Carmel and Vicinity Improvements
H. Change Order No. 3, I.C. 51-308A, N.E. Quadrant of MCA Roadway System
I. Resolution ordering the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Drainage Im-
provements in the Bluffs West Area, I.C. 62-069 (Resolution No. 84-27)
J. Final Plat approval for Edenvale Industrial Park 7th Addition (Resolution
W6784-280)
K. Final Plat approval for Valley View Manor Homes (Resolution No. 84-263)
L. Final Plat approval for Wilson Ridge (Resolution No. 84-281)
M. Final Plat approval for Minnesota Tree 2nd Addition (Resolution No. 84-282)
N. Reject bids for installation of bridges for Staring Lake Bike Trail
O. Final a royal of Municipal Industrial Development Bonds in the amount of
2750,000.00 for Portnoy Project (Resolution No. 84-287)
P. Approval of contract for 1984 LAWCON Grant
Q. Authorization of DNR Permit for Anderson Lakes Parkway
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. EDEN COMMONS by the Chasewood Company. Request for zoning district change
from Rural to RM-2.5 for 194 multiple family residential units, preliminary
plat of 12.5 acres into one lot, and Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Review. Location: northwest corner of Franlo Road and Preserve Boulevard.
(Ordinance No, 118-84 - rezoning from Rural to RM-2,5; Resolution No, 84-274
- preliminary plat)
'3
City Council Minutes -3- October 16, 1984
City Manager Jullie stated official notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been notified.
Joe Crook, representing Chasewood, spoke to the request.
Planning Director Enger indicated this request had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its meetings on August 27, 1984, September 10, 1984,
and September 24, 1984; the hearings before the Planning Commission were
continued each time to allow the proponent to make changes and improvements
to the project. The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to recommend approval
of the request subject to the recommendations included in the Staff Reports
dated August 24, 1984, September 7, 1984, and September 21, 1984.
Director of Community Services Lambert stated the Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Commission had reviewed the request at its meeting on
October 15, 1984, at which time it voted to recommend approval as per the
recommendations included in the Planning Staff Reports. The Parks, Recreation
& Natural Resources Commission also recommended that a tot lot not be included
and requested that a one-year guarantee on all landscaping materials be
included in the Developer's Agreement.
Penzel asked what the approved or planned uses are in the vicinity of this
proposal and also about the need for upgrading Preserve Boulevard. Enger
said a Hennepin County Library has been approved for the area due north
of this; on the east there are carriage homes and four-plexes; to the
southeast there is a single family area; further to the south are the
Windslope Apartments. He noted the area due south of this is an approved
area of duplex lots, one is under construction and one has been remodeled
into a duplex. The area to the west is rural property homesteads and is
designated in the Guide Plan as high-density residential. Enger stated
that Preserve Boulevard is being handled currently under a maintenance
program by the City. The capacity of Preserve Boulevard is not a problem
at this time; the intersection with Prairie Center Drive has free right
turn lanes and has the capacity to handle 10,000 cars per day. Director
of Public Works Dietz said the actual up-grading of Preserve Boulevard is
not in the City's Five-Year Program. An overlay for the road is scheduled
for 1985. Penzel said he felt it would be wise to include improvements to
this road at the same time this project is approved. Bentley noted this is
not a standard two-lane road -- it is not full width. He stated there is
no storm sewer in the road which creates problems from time to time. Bentley
stated the opening of the Target store has increased the amount of traffic
on Preserve Boulevard.
Redpath asked if Bentley was suggesting that Preserve Boulevard be upgraded
from Prairie Center Drive to Anderson Lakes Parkway. Penzel said that from
a quality of construction standpoint, this roadway was below standard. He
said that Eden Commons would add approximately 1600 trips per day to the
road. He said he thought perhaps the road should be totally upgraded at the
time of the construction of Eden Commons.
City Council Minutes -4- October 16, 1984
Anderson asked if there would be fireplaces in the units. Crook said
about 35 - 40Z of the units would include fireplaces. Anderson asked
if smoke alarms or fire detectors were required. Crook said smoke
alarms are installed in all units. Crook said he did not recall any
problems with fireplaces in any of their units; all fireplaces are in-
stalled according to State and local codes. Penzel asked what type of
chimney maintenance was proposed. Crook said he did not know if there
was a chimney maintenance program as such.
Penzel inquired about the rationale which went into the request for
additional units as well as the reason for surface rather than struc-
tured parking. Crook said the concept is much looser than that which
had been proposed; there is more open space. Penzel asked how the
net density of this proposal compared with the net density of the
Hans Hagen units across the street. Enger said the Hagen development
had 7 units per acre and this would be 15.7 units per acre which would
make it similar to the Shadow Green development.
Penzel noted a letter of October 16, 1984, from Geisler, Boies and
Peterson which opposed the request.
Lyle Landstrom, 2805 Chowen Avenue South, representing Hennepin County
Property Management, said they would like assurances that the Library
parking lot would not be used as an overflow lot by this development.
Enger said the proposal included two parking spaces per unit which
was felt to be adequate. Penzel asked if some type of barriers might
be put in place which would make it less desirable to walk between
the two developments.
Patricia Pidcock, 8379 Red Rock Road, asked about the provisions for
guest parking. Crook indicated these developments generated 1.3 spaces
per unit; it was his feeling that the 2.0 requirement is excessive, but
he said they are willing to go along with that. He noted that the peak
parking time in units such as these is Sunday evening. Pidcock asked
if the cities referred to had public transportation. Crook said he
thought their developments were located in areas where the residents
were dependent on their own cars for transportation.
Landstrom asked if the City took into account the fact that many Minne-
sotans had boats, recreational vehicles, etc. to store. Enger said
the City has required areas for storage of this nature -- and the City
was finding that, in developments such as this, the areas which had been
set aside for this type of storage were now being used for another purpose.
Management, he noted, is finding it best not to allow parking for this
type of vehicle/use.
Bud Lambert, 2512 Rhode Island, Golden Valley, representing a homeowner
on the western edge of Franlo, asked what kind of improvements would be
necessary to Franlo Road. Dietz said no improvements are contemplated
as the first section of Franlo Road was constructed with this development
in mind.
City Council Minutes -5- October 16, 1984
Bob Dunbar, 11270 Lanewood Circles, President of The Preserve Homeowners'
Association, asked why this proposal had not been brought before the
Homeowners' Association. Crook said he was not aware of the Homeowners'
Association in The Preserve. Bentley said he felt Dunbar had a very valid
point. Bentley said there are other impacts here that the proponent is
not aware of -- such as annual dues assessed against each unit as well
as restrictive covenants to the property. Bentley indicated that The
Preserve has the right to review this based on use of The Preserve's
facilities.
Tangen said there were continued Public Hearings before the Planning
Commission on this development and it seemed to him that someone in
The Preserve should have been aware of that; he said he was surprised
the Homeowner's Association was not watching for things like this.
Anderson asked if all the City's procedures had been adhered to. Enger
said they had. Anderson then inquired whether or not The Preserve Home-
owners' Association action would have any bearing on the action taken by
the City Council. City Attorney Pauly said the Homeowner's Association's
action would be an independent action. Penzel said they could review
the proposal between 1st and 2nd Readings by the Council.
Doug Reuter, 8750 Black Maple Drive, said the precedent has been "buyer
beware." He asked about the legality of the covenants and restrictions.
Pauly stated that covenants and restrictions are limitations which "run"
with the land and affect the land and the owners of those lands; they are
enforceable by one of the landowners against another landowner or landowners.
It is usually a matter of private enforcement and private remedy,if there is
a violation of a covenant or restriction -- the City is not a party to
those agreements.
Dunbar stated he became aware of this matter at 3:30 p.m. this afternoon.
He said he had no idea why no one was at the Planning Commission Public
Hearings on the part of The Preserve. He said he could not figure out
how this had gone through the planning process with no one having asked
if this had been before The Preserve Homeowners' Association. Bentley
said he had always felt there had been a spirit of cooperation on the
part of developers and The Preserve Homeowners' Association; he said he
did not think it would be wrong to give preliminary approval to this
proposal subject to the proponents meeting with the Homeowners' Associ-
ation. He said he would also like to see a feasibility report on Preserve
Boulevard done.
Bentley asked if this parcel was included in the original PUD for The
Preserve. Enger said he thought it had been. Bentley said he did not
see anything under the review process about PUD review. Enger said this
is a zoning question and not a PUD change request. He said what should
have been included in the Staff Report was comparisons to the original
PUD.
City Council Minutes -6- October 16, 1984
Crook said they would like to have approval from the Council this evening.
He said they would like to meet with the Homeowners Association; he said
they felt these were two separate matters.
Floyd 5ieferman, 6997 Edgebrook Place, asked if the parking spaces were
sheltered. Crook said there is one space per unit of "detached" parking
and one sheltered space (garage). Sieferman noted that there are more
buildings than shown on the plan as the garages are not shown.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 118-84, rezoning. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to adopt Resolution No. 84-274,
preliminary plat approval. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare a
Developer's Agreement taking into consideration the recommendations of Com-
missions and Staff and noting that plantings on the north property line
should include large size evergreens as well as barberry and prickly ash
so the Library parking lot is not used by residents and guests of the Eden
Commons development. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to recommend strongly that the
proponent meet with The Preserve Homeowners' Association prior to 2nd
Reading of the Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Penzel, to direct Staff to prepare
a feasibility study for Preserve Boulevard (to widen Preserve Boulevard
to a two-lane facility with storm sewer -- with an improved, soil corrected
roadway.) Motion carried unanimously.
B. SUPERAMERICA. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Hwy
and preliminary plat of 1.35 acres for Service Station/Convenience Store.
Location: southwest quardrant of County Road 4 and Highway 5. (Ordinance
No. 119-84 - rezoning from Rural to C-Hwy and Resolution No. 84-275 -
preliminary plat)
City Manager Jullie said notice of this Public Hearing had been published
and property owners within the vicinity had been notified,
Greg Gustafson, attorney for Superamerica, addressed the proposal.
Director of Planning Enger indicated this request had been reviewed by
the Planning Commission at its meeting on September 24, 1984, at which
time the Commission voted to recommend approval subject to the recommen-
dations included in the September 21, 1984, Staff Report and with the
addition that landscaping not interfere with sight lines and not
obstruct signs which have been constructed by property owners to the south.
Enger noted that the September 21, 1984, Staff Report suggests that approval
be based on plans dated August 10, 1984.
There were no issues of concern to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission.
'7
City Council Minutes -7- October 16, 1984
Redpath inquired about the access to this site. Enger stated that
the only full access would be via Terrey Pine Drive; in the future
there will be a right-in, right-out access off of County Road 4
and a right-in entrance off of Highway 5.
Penzel noted a letter which had been received from Dr. Alston Lundgren
regarding the sign situation.
Dr. Alston Lundgren, owner of adjacent property, said the issue had been
adequately addressed and his objections had been satisfied.
Gerald Anderson, 16506 Terry Pine Drive, said he was concerned about the
median and the increased amount of traffic which might be put onto Terrey
Pine. Enger explained the road system which will be used and the traffic
patterns; he noted the road system was planned with this development in
mind. Enger said signs could be put up which would indicate "children
playing" and there would be directional signs. Director of Public Works
Dietz concurred.
Gerald Anderson said he would like to see traffic into the residential
area discouraged.
Bentley asked what type of screening is proposed. Enger said none is
proposed other than what was put in between Terrey Pine Court and the area
immediately adjacent. Bentley said he felt some should be included.
Patricia Pidcock, 8379 Red Rock Road, asked the size of the Superamerica
sign. Enger reviewed the sign ordinance; Gustafson noted they would comply
with the sign ordinance.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 119-84, rezoning. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No. 84-275,
approving the preliminary plat of Superamerica. Motion carried with Penzel
voting "no."
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to direct Staff to prepare a
Summary Resolution of Approval as per Commission and Staff recommendations
including consideration of reduction in the size of the canopy (this would
be returned to the Council prior to 2nd Reading), including signs to
mark the residential area along Terrey Pine, and cut-off luminar lighting.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes -8- October 16, 1984
C. PRIMETECH II by Prime Development. Request for Planned Unit Development
District Review of 20.0 acres; zoning district change from Rural to
Commercial-Regional-Service 1.0 acre; and preliminary plat of 4.0 acres
into one lot for construction of a day care center. Location: north of
Shady Oak Road, east of City West Parkway. (Ordinance No. 120-84-PUD-9-84
- rezoning from Rural to PUD-9-84-Conriercial-Regional-Service; and
Resolution No. 84-276 - preliminary plat.'
City Manager Jullie indicated notice of this Public Hearing had been
published and property owners within the project vicinity had been
notified.
Ron Erickson, architect for the proponent, addressed the request.
Director of Planning Enger noted this had been reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its meeting on September 24, 1984, at which time it voted
to recommend approval subject to the recommendations included in the
September 21, 1984, Staff Report.
This request was not reviewed by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission.
Penzel asked about the impact of the noise and traffic fumes on the
day care center and the orientation of its play space to the north rather
than to the south. Enger said the play area has a southwest orientation.
He stated that the fumes due to the traffic had to be balanced between the
traffic on the loop road vs. that on Center Parkway.
Anderson asked if infant care would be available, Erickson said there
would be space to 8 - 10 infants.
Penzel asked if a tornado shelter was included. Erickson said he was not
able to respond to that; he noted that they had met all of the requirments
for day care centers but had not come across that particular item. Redpath
stated that had not been required in other day care centers.
Floyd Sieferman, 6997 Edgebrook Place, expressed concern about the loop
road and said he felt that should be completed or a provision made so it
would be completed. Erickson said they would like to coordinate the loop
road with future development in that area.
MOTION: Bentley moved , by Tangen, to close the Public Hearing
and to give 1st Reading to Ordinance No. 120-84, rezoning. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No, 84-276,
approving the preliminary plat of Primetech II for Prime Development. Motion
carried unanimously.
9
City Council Minutes -9- October 16, 1984
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Tangen, to direct Staff to prepare
a Developer's Agreement as per Commission and Staff recommendations;
and to note that 8 - 10 infant care spaces will be provided in the
day care center and that the road is a temporary access and not a
permagent one -- the loop road will be completed at the time of
future development. Motion carried unanimously.
V, PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOS. 16311 - 16565
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the Payment of
Claims Nos. 16311 - 16565. Roll call vote: Anderson, Bentley, Redpath,
Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
There were none.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.
VIII. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
Redpath - noted the Aviation Advisory Task Force will meet at Flying
Cloud Airport.
Bentley - asked that the City work towards getting semaphores installed
at theintersection of Highway 169 and Prairie Center Drive prior to
the time snow falls. City Manager Jullie said Staff has been talking to
Mn/DOT about getting any underground work done prior to the first frost.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize Staff to
proceed with preliminary underground work. Roll call vote: Anderson,
Bentley, Redpath, Tangen and Penzel voted "aye." Motion carried unanimously.
(Cost to be between $5,000 and $10,000.)
B. Report of City Manager
1. Request for approval of site grading for Muirfield
City Manager Jullie referred to the October 12, 1984, memorandum
from Planning Director Enger which addressed this request,
Tangen asked if the Muirfield rezoning request would be ready for
2nd Reading at the next Council meeting, Enger noted it would be.
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Tangen, to authorize Staff to
issue a grading permit according to City Ordinance and subject to
changes as determined necessary by the City Engineer, prior to 2nd
Reading of MuirfiPld. Motion carried unanimously.
10
City Council Minutes -10- October 16, 1984
2. MIDB Guidelines (continued from 8/28/84)
City Manager Jullie said the Development Commission had not
formalized its discussions on this matter. He called attention
to a memorandum of October 11, 1984, in which general guidelines
were outlined which might be of help. .
MOTION: Tangen moved, seconded by Redpath, to receive the recom-
mendations/suggestions as outlined in Finance Director Frane's memo
of October 11, 1984. Motion carried unanimously.
C. Report of City Attornly.
City Attorney Pauly reviewed what has been done in other metropolitan
communities regarding woodpiles and woodpile ordinances. He suggested
that, should the Council decide to do so, the zoning code be amended to
prohibit woodpiles in the front yard setback. He asked if the Council
would like to have him proceed with a draft of such an ordinance.
Penzel asked what would happen with a corner lot. Pauly indicated
some changes might have to be noted in the ordinance to define this.
Anderson asked if the City had a nuisance ordinance which would take
care of other things such as construction vehicles, trailers, etc.
Pauly said the City does have some restrictions in place regarding
those and he cited them. Tangen asked what might be done when there
was storage alongside a home -- in the side yard setback.
Bentley expressed concern that the City proceed very carefully in this
area -- he said the only major problem of which he was aware was with
storage in the front yard setback.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Anderson, to direct the City Attorney
to put together an amendment to the City Code to be brought back to Staff
and City Council for review. Motion carried unanimously.
Penzel asked City Attorney Pauly to direct a communication to Bob
Mavis regarding what Staff and City Council have done regarding this
matter and what action is to be taken.
D. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Award contract for CSAH 1 & 18 Utility Improvements, I.C. 52-062
TResolution No. 82-284)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No.
82-284, accepting the bid of S. M. Hentges & Sons for 1.C. 52-062,
for utility improvements on County Road No. 1. Motion carried unani-
mously.
it
City Council Minutes -11- October 16, 1984
2. Award contract for Eden Road and Singletree Lane Improvements,
I.C. 52-011A & B (Resolution No. 84-285)
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Penzel, to adopt Resolution No.
84-285, accepting the bid of Northdale Construction Company for I.C.
52-0011% (Eden Road) and I.C. 52-0018 (Singletree Lane.) Motion
carried unanimously.
3. Award contract for Lime Sludge Hauling, I.C. 52-063 (Resolution No.
84-283)
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Redpath, to adopt Resolution No.
84-283, accepting the bid of Stanley E. Pond for I.C. 52-068 for
lime sludge hauling. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
There was none.
X. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to adjourn the meeting at 10:35
p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1984
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
7:30 PM, SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
Mayor Wolfgang H. Penzel, Richard Anderson,
George Bentley, Paul Redpath and George Tangen
Finance Director John D. Frane and City Attorney
Roger Pauly
ROLL CALL: Councilman George Tangen was absent.
I. PUBLIC HEARING
A. REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,700,000 FOR BKH PARTNERSHIP (TECH III PROJECT) }Resolu-
tion No. 84-329)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to close the Public Hearing
and to adopt Resolution No. 84-329, giving preliminary approval to a project
under the Minnestoa Municipal Industrial Development Act, referring the pro-
posal to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority for approval
and authorizing preparation of necessary documents. Motion carried unani-
mously.
II. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
A. REQUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF MUNCIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $2,700,000 FOR BHK PARTNERSHIP (TECH III PROJECT) Resolution No.
84-330)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 84-330,
relating to a $2,700,000 City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, Commercial Develop-
ment Revenue Bond; authorizing the issuance thereof pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 474. Motion carried unanimously.
B. REQUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BONDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $1,400,000 FOR REYNOLDS PRINTING (Resolution No. 84-331)
MOTION: Redpath moved, seconded by Bentley, to adopt Resolution No. 84-331.
Motion carried unanimously.
III. NEW BUSINESS
City Attorney Pauly reviewed with the Council the proposed settlement of the
Terry Douglas matter.
MOTION: Bentley moved, seconded by Redpath, to approve the settlement with
Terry Douglas as outlined by City Attorney Pauly. Motion carried with Anderson
voting "no."
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent.
/3
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
January 4, 1985
Black & Veatch Design Contract for Water Plant Expansion
Attached for your review and consideration is a proposed contract with the
engineering consulting firm of Black & Veatch. This firm has done all the
previous design and construction observation for our water system and the
proposal is that they continue with the next phase of our system expansion.
Currently, the water treatment plant has a capacity of 8 million gallons
per day. In 1984, the summer months found us consistently pumping at about
80% of capacity, with maximum days exceeding plant capacity. Although we do
not anticipate any significant problems with the system during the next two
years, it may be necessary to "smooth off the peaks" and require an
odd/even sprinkling ban. However, since it will take three construction
seasons to design and put a plant expansion into operation, it is necessary
that that work commence at this time in order to avoid operational problems
in the future. My staff and I have reviewed the technical considerations
of the Black & Veatch proposal as well as the fee schedule and find that
the proposal provides a very comprehensive review of our system at a
reasonable rate of compensation. With the schedule as outlined in the
document, the plant expansion from 8 million gallons per day to 18 million
gallons per day should be operational in the fall of 1988.
Based on the above considerations, I recommend that the Mayor and Manager
be authorized to execute the attached engineering services agreement with
Black & Veatch and that the firm be directed to proceed with the project
with a schedule similar to the one attached to the document.
EAD:sg
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT, executed in duplicate this day of 1985, between the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereinafter called
the City, and Black & Veatch, Engineers-Architects, of Kansas City,
Missouri, hereinafter called the Engineer;
WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained,
the City hereby agrees to employ the Engineer to prepare a Comprehensive
Plan of the City's water system and to provide the services hereinafter
outlined in connection with a 10 million gallon per day expansion to the
existing water treatment plant and agrees to pay them for such services
in accordance with the schedule of fees herein contained.
SECTION I - SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Engineer agrees to perform engineering services in connection with
the project, including the following items.
Comprehensive Plan
Design Phase Services
Construction Phase Services
Resident Project Representation Services
Supplemental Services
Description of the services to be performed is listed in Appendix A.
A tentative schedule outlining the general time periods for performance
of the engineering services is included in Appendix B.
SECTION II - COMPENSATION
For the services covered by this Contract, the City agrees to pay the
Engineer as follows:
A. For the Comprehensive Plan, Design Phase Services and Construction
Phase Services, a fee based on cost plus reimbursement of
actual expenses. Cost shall mean twice the actual payroll
cost of personnel employed on the work. Payroll cost is
defined as salary plus 30 percent. Itemized invoices will be
submitted and payable monthly. The maximum amount to be
invoiced without further authorization is as follows.
1. For Comprehensive Plan, as described in Appendix A:
Maximum
Authorization
Section B.1.a.
thru e. Facility Report
55,000
Section B.I.f. Sludge/Aeration Report 12,000
Section 8.1.g. Energy Report
10,000
Section B.4.a. Financial Report
Phase I
12,000
1
If all sections of the Comprehensive Plan listed
above are authorized, the maximum amount for these
sections shall not exceed $83,000.
2. For Financial Report, Phase II, of the Comprehensive
Plan as described in Section B.2.b of Appendix A, the
maximum amount shall not exceed $15,000.
3. For Design Phase Services, as described in Appendix A,
Section C, the estimated fee is $424,000.
For Construction Phase Services, as described in Appendix A,
Section D, the estimated fee is $108,000.
The fees earned for Design and Construction Phase Services
may vary from the estimated fee above, but the total thereof
shall not exceed $532,000.
B. For Resident Project Representation Services, a fee based on
cost plus reimbursemedt of actual expenses. Cost, for Resident
Services involving a minimum of one continuous year assignment
for each person assigned by the Engineer, shall mean the
actual payroll cost plus 60 percent. Cost, for other Resident
Services, shall mean mice the actual payroll cost.
Payroll cost is defined as salary plus 30 percent. Itemized
invoices will be submitted and payable monthly. A maximum amount
for Resident Services will be established before the work is
started. Resident Services are not included in any of the billing
limits named above.
C. For Supplemental Services, a fee based on cost plus reimbursement
of actual expenses with an agreed maximum amount to be billed.
Cost shall mean twice the actual payroll cost of personnel
employed on the work. Payroll cost is defined as salary plus
30 percent. A maximum amount for each item of supplemental
services will be established before the work is started.
Supplemental services are not included in any of the billing
limits named above.
D. The following are reimbursable expenses that are included in
the billing limit for the work outlined in Appendix A.
1. Travel, subsistence, and incidental costs.
2. Use of motor vehicles on a mileage or rental basis.
3. Telephone and telegraph costs.
4. Reproduction of reports, drawings, and specifications.
5. Postage and shipping charges for project—related materials.
6. Computer time charges, including program use charges.
7. Cost of any other materials or services specifically for
and applicable to only this project.
2
8. Moving costs for full-time on-site personnel.
9. Rental charges for use of equipment, including equipment
owned by the Engineer.
10. Cost for subconsultants as described in Appendix A.
• E. The amounts listed above do not include any allowance for local
City taxes, license fees, or special state fees or taxes
(other than state income taxes). Should local taxes or fees be
applicable to the engineering work or payments therefor, the
amount of such fees or taxes shall be a reimbursable expense
and billing limits shall be increased by the amount of such
fees or taxes.
F. Partial periodic monthly payments shall be made to the Engineer
by the City for cost plus reimbursable expense items as shown
on an itemized statement prepared each month by the Engineer.
The entire amount due shall be paid each month provided the
agreed maximum amount has not been exceeded.
Monthly payments to the Engineer shall be made within 30 days
after billing is received by the City.
SECTION III - CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will furnish, as required for the work and not at the expense
of the Engineer, the following items:
A. All laboratory work such as water quality testing and analyses.
B. Access to public and private property, as necessary, when
required in conduct of field investigations.
C. Office desk space for use by the Engineer's personnel during
field investigations.
D. Property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic, and
utility surveys, and property descriptions in case such
information is required.
E. All maps, drawings, records, and other data that are available
in the files of the City and which may be useful in the work
involved under this contract.
F. Metered water sales by group classifications such as residential,
commercial, industrial and other special uses.
C. Population projections for use in determining future water demands.
H. Ceotechnical engineering services, including exploratory work
laboratory testing, and professional interpretations of exploratory
and test data.
3
SECTION IV - OTHER MATTERS
It is mutually understood and agreed:
A. That the Engineer shall not be liable for delays resulting from
cahses beyond the reasonable control of the Engineer and that
the Engineer has made no warranties, expressed or implied,
which are not expressly set forth in this Contract; and that
under no circumstances will the Engineer be liable for indirect
or consequential damage.
B. That either party has the right to terminate this Contract for
any cause, in which event the Engineer shall be paid on the
basis of percentage of completion of the work to be performed
hereunder. The ownership of the work completed at the time of
such termination shall be retained by the City.
C. That a change in scope of work shall be accompanied by a
corresponding adjustment in the compensation to be paid
hereunder, which adjustment shall be as may be mutually
agreed upon between the parties hereto prior to the
implementation of such change in scope.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on the date
first above written.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
By
4
APPENDIX A
TO
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
SCOPE OF WORK
A. GENERAL
The water system improvements project will consist of the elements
outlined below:
Comprehensive Plan
- Facility Report
- Financial Report (Phases I & II)
• Design Phase Services
- Field Surveys .
- Construction Drawings and Specifications
• Construction Phase Services
- Bidding Assistance
- Contract Administration Services
• Resident Project Representation
• Supplemental Services
B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to determine the facility and
operational requirements for the water system and provide a priority
schedule and budget costs for all major water works improvements. The
Comprehensive Plan will be a complete study to replace the previous
report which was prepared in 1969 prior to construction of the treatment
plant and distribution system. Since the original study, the City has
experienced phenominal growth. The Comprehensive Report will assess
this rapid development and its impact on the water system. With the
15 years of operating data now available, projections of future water
use can be refined and used as the basis for planning future improvements.
The Comprehensive Plan consists of two reports: (1) Facility Report
and (2) Financial Report.
The purpose of the Facility Report is to provide a plan for future
development of the water system which will allow the system to grow in
an economical and coordinated manner while continuing to provide high
quality water service to the growing City of Eden Prairie. The report
will determine the water supply, treatment, and distribution improvements
required by the planned 10 mgd expansion of the existing facilities.
A-1
Based upon these requirements, the report will present a priority
schedule and budget costs for future waterworks improvements. The
Facility Plan will contain two reports in its appendix entitled:
(1) Sludge/Aeration Report; and (2) Energy Report. These two appended
reports will explore ways to improve the economy of plant operations and
will be prepared early in the study period for City staff review and
input.
The Financial Report will be prepared in two phases to allow review of
Phase I by the City staff prior to preparing Phase II. Phase I of the
Financial Report will project sources and uses of operating and capital
funds to assess the adequacy of revenues. Should revenue under the
existing water rates be inadequate to meet projected revenue requirements,
Phase II of the Financial Report will allocate costs among user classes
and design an equitable rate structure to meet projected requirements.
1. FACILITY REPORT
a. Preliminary Tasks
(1) Conduct Initial Meeting. Conduct an initial meeting between
the Engineer and the City to define lines of communication;
establish and confirm the study scope, schedule, and procedures
to be used, and confirm the study area.
(2) Collect and Review Existing Information. Review the available
information pertaining to the City's existing water system,
including data already collected by the Engineer. Establish
priorities for the collection of additional data in areas
where current information is insufficient.
(3) Inspect Existing Facilities. Inspect the supply, treatment,
storage and pumping facilities to provide a basis for appraisal
and for evaluation of the respective impact of each facility
on the future needs of the City.
(4) Review and Evaluate Population Data. Review the 1970 and 1980
U.S. Census population for the study area. Review the population
projections with the City. Determine the population for 1985
and the selected design year and allocate to the distribution
network for computer analysis.
(5) Review and Evaluate Water Production Records. Review past
average day, maximum day, minimum month, average month, and
maximum month water uses. Estimate past maximum hour demand
rates. Evaluate past average day, maximum day, maximum hour,
minimum month, average month, and maximum month use to determine
the historical and design demand ratios.
(6) Review and Evaluate Water Sales Records. In each meter route
or comparable area, determine the recent average day metered
sales by use classification. Determine the historical trend
of the metered sales. Establish water use design criteria by
use classification (residential or commercial). Determine the
A-2
tO
historical and design "unaccounted-for" water ratio. Establish
demand factors for design maximum day to average day as well
as for maximum hour to maximum day for both residential and
commercial users.
(7) Estimate Future Water Use. On the basis of the population
projections and water use estimates made in the preceding
tasks, determine the average day, maximum day, maximum hour,
minimum month, average month and maximum month water use for
1985 and the design year. The design year will correspond
to the year which has a maximum day demand of 18 mgd.
b. Ground Water Supply Review
(1) Study Published Reports. Review published data and reports on
ground water supplies in the general vicinity of Eden Prairie.
(2) Collect Existing Data. Collect available drawdawn data from
the existing Eden Prairie wells.
(3) Evaluate Well Spacing and Sizing. Evaluate future well sizing
and spacing based upon available data.
(4) Incorporate Additional Considerations. Based upon the recom-
mendations of the Energy Report, incorporate engine-driven
well pumps, premium efficiency motors, or variable speed
motors into site plan.
(5) Select Well Sites. Select sites for the new wells that are
available and comply with local aesthic considerations as well
as being accessible and properly spaced from each other and
from existing wells.
(6) Select Well Collector Route. Select routes for the well
collector line where easements can most easily be obtained and
still make reasonably direct connections between the wells.
(7) Conduct City Review Meeting. Present findings to City and
review the proposed recommendations. Incorporate the review
comments of the City staff into the final recommendations.
c. Treatment Plant Study
(1) Incorporate Additional Modifications. Based upon the conclusions
of the Sludge/Aeration Report and the Energy Report, prepare a
layout of additional recommended modifications to the plant.
These modifications may include induced draft aerators, engine-
driven high service pumps, variable speed motors on the high
service pumps, changing size of high service pumps, and
additional treated water storage capacity.
A-3
2 1
(2) Review Potential Applications of Automation. Review treatment
plant processes and the operation and maintenance requirements
to locate places where increased automation could be applied.
Determine the resulting impact on the operating staff, and
evaluate the cost effectiveness of increased automation.
(3) Review Water Department Staffing Needs. Compare the size of
the Cit7i 1 i-gater Department Staff with those of other cities
of similar size. Include the findings of the evaluation of
plant automation in the recommendations regarding plant
staffing.
(4) Conduct City Review Meeting,. Present findings to City and
review the proposed recommendations. Incorporate the review
comments of the City staff into the final recommendations.
d. Distribution System Studies
(1) Evaluate Existing Distribution System Facilities. Evaluate
the existing high service pumping, storage, and distribution
system facilities for their reliability and operational
flexibility. This evaluation will consider such variables as
(1) configuration of the distribution system; (2) relationship
between pumping and storage capacities; (3) ground topography
and system pressures; and (4) monitoring and control facilities.
Determine current operational procedures and difficulties by
discussion with City personnel.
(2) Prepare Distribution System Network. Utilizing the City's
existing distribution system maps, prepare a skeletonized
network worksheet and distribution system map of all mains to
be included in the computer model. Discuss the skeletonized
worksheet with the City to verify the completeness of the
systems to be analyzed. Review jointly the pipe sizes, pipe
lengths, and selected Hazen-Williams coefficient values for
the computer model.
(3) Allocate Water Demands. Allocate (by use class) the design
year average day water use to the distribution network.
(4) Establish Basic Assumptions and Criteria. Before analyzing
the distribution network, establish (in consultation with the
City) the basic assumptions, design criteria, control elevations,
system inputs, design pressures, system constraints, and
tentative improvements.
(5) Conduct Distribution System Computer Modeling. Conduct
computerized hydraulic analyses of the distribution system
to determine system performance under maximum hour, maximum
day, storage replenishment, and average day conditions for
1985 and the selected design year. Calibrate and adjust the
A-4
ZL
initial model to simulate actual system performance, based on
operational logs. Conduct five analyses of fire flow capability
superimposed on 1985 maximum day demands. Determine the
transmission and distribution main, storage, and pumping
improvements required for 1985 and the selected design year.
Determine the effectiveness of existing storage and pumping
facilities. Prepare final analyses establishing an improvements
program based on phased construction with a priority schedule
for planning purposes.
(6) Conduct City Review Meeting. Conduct a meeting, and provide
computer worksheets of the final analyses to the City for
review and comments.
e. Report
(1) Develop Improvements Program. Prepare a comprehensive exhibit
showing the recommended improvements including location of
wells, alignment of ma3or maims, locations of future distribution
storage facilities, and locations of expanded treatment and
pumping facilities.
(2) Develop Cost Opinions. Prepare opinions of probable costs for
all recommended distribution system improvements. Provide the
City with a phased development plan, along with a priority
schedule and budget costs for planning purposes.
(3) Prepare Preliminary Report. Prepare a preliminary report of
the findings and recommendations of the study based on the
systematic execution of all preceding tasks. The preliminary
report will consist of a narrative discussion. of the results
of the investigation, including exhibits, tables, graphs,
and thefts, and an evaluation and computer analysis of the
distribution network. Present the preliminary report to the
City for review.
(4) Prepare Final Report. Upon receipt and incorporation of the
City 's review comments, complete the Final Report and deliver
50 copies to the City and 100 extra copies of the nap showing
the recommended improvements. After acceptance of the Final
Report, furnish relevant computer worksheets for each final
hydraulic analysis.
(5) Present Report. Attend one meeting with the City Council
or other designated group, to discuss the findings and
recommendations of the Report.
A-5
f. Sludge/Aeration Report (Appendix to Facility Report)
(1) Collect Past Records. Collect data on volume of sludge and
disposal cost from past lagoon cleaning contracts.
(2) Estimate Future Sludge Volumes. Estimate future sludge
production rates based upon projected water demands.
(3) Estimate lagoon Costs. Estimate capital costs and operation
and maintenance costs for dewatering of all future sludge
volumes with lagoons. Also estimate lagoon costs associated
with handling only peak flows in excess of capacity of mechanical
dewatering equipment.
(4) Evaluate Mechanical Dewatering. Locate facilities using both
belt filter presses and centrifuges for dewatering lime sludge.
Determine operation and maintenance costs experienced at these
installations. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of
centrifuges and belt filter presses in a lime sludge dewatering
application. Select the type of equipment which will best
serve the City's application. Subsequent cost comparisons
will be based on the selected type of equipment.
(5) Determine Dewatering Equipment Capacity. Determine the capacity
of dewatering equipment which can be most efficiently utilized
under projected future conditions. Evaluate various capacities
of dewatering equipment with the small capacity alternatives
being used in conjunction with the existing lagoons which
would supplement capacity during peak loads.
(6) Estimate Dewatering Equipment Costs. Estimate capital costs
and operation and maintenance costs for the mechanical dewatering
equipment of the capacities selected for investigation.
(7) Review Landfill Sites. Review existing landfill sites.
Determine landfill use fees and planned future life expectancy
of existing landfills.
(8) Discussion of Sludge Disposal Alternatives. Provide an overview
of alternative means of sludge disposal and their environmental
impacts. The discussion will include, but not necessarily be
limited to, disposal to the sanitary sewer and disposal to
farm land.
(9) Analyze Life Cycle Costs, Determine life cycle cost for
the sludge dewatering alternatives. Prepare recommendations
based upon the conclusions of the analyses.
A-6
(10) Estimate Annual Average. Flows. Estimate future annual average
flows based upon the projected population and water demand
projections through the service life of the aerators. Determine
concentration of carbon dioxide in the untreated well water.
(11) Determine Aerator Capacity. Determine the capacity of aerators
which can be most efficiently utilized under projected future
flows. Project average flow through aerators, allowing for
design capacity and downtime for maintenance.
(12) Estimate Aerator Costs. Estimate capital costs and operation
and maintenance costs for the aerators. Operating costs are
to include extra power required for pumping and the use of fans.
(13) Estimate Aerator Savings. Estimate cost savings due to
aerators from reduction in lime feed and reduction in sludge
generation.
(14) Analyze . Life Cycle Costs. Determine life cycle cost of
aerators based upon capital costs, O&M costs, O&M savings, and
remaining value through the service life of the equipment and
prepare recommendations.
(15) Conduct City Review Meeting. Review findings and proposed
recommended improvements with City staff.
(16) prepare Final Report. Upon receipt and incorporation of the
City's review comments, complete the Final Report and deliver
5 copies to the City.
g . Energy Report (Appendix to Facility Report)
(1) Evaluate PumpinR Facilities. Input actual pump curves into
the computer program for hydraulic analysis of the distribution
system to ascertain whether the high service pumping facilities
are operating in an energy-efficient range. Compare the
operating characteristics of the existing pumping facilities
with the required range of operating conditions to determine
how effectively the pumping units meet the system requirements.
(2) Evaluate Demand Charges. Obtain data from Northern States Power
on energy costs and demand charges, plans for future rate
changes, and on rate options available to large users.
(3) Evaluate Engine-Driven Pumps. Evaluate use of engine-driven
well and high service pumps for peaking service to minimize
demand charges. Develop projected capital, operation, and
maintenance costs, compare with electric motor costs, and
determine potential savings.
A-7
2„S
(4) Evaluate Premium Efficiency Motors. Compare the efficiency
of premium efficiency motors with the efficiency of the
existing motors. Also evaluate the effect of power factor
correction and quantify potential energy savings.
(5) Evaluate Pump Capacities. Determine potential savings from
utilization of smaller capacity high service pumps, two-speed
pump motors, or variable speed pump motors to reduce demand
charges.
(6) Evaluate Water Storage. Determine potential savings from
operating flexibility achieved with additional water storage
capacity. Evaluate both additional water storage at the plant
prior to high service pumpage and increased elevated storage in
the distribution system.
(7) Evaluate Plant Operation. Evaluate potential savings from
increased pumpage during hours of off-peak electrical usage.
(8) Prepare Payback Analysis. Prepare payback analysis of the
evaluated alternative improvements. Tentatively select the
recommended improvements.
(9) Conduct City Review Meeting. Review findings and proposed
recommendations with City staff. •
(10) Prepare Final Report. Upon receipt and incorporation of the
City's review comments, complete the Final Report and deliver
5 copies to the City. .
2. FINANCIAL REPORT
a. Phase I - Financial Plan
(1) Study Service Area. Study service area growth and water use,
taking into account climatic and other local conditions.
Project water sales volumes and revenues which may be expected
during a five year study period based on past records of
numbers and types of customers served, historical water use by
customer class, and revenues under existing rates.
(2) Analyze Operating Expenses. Analyze past water system operation
and maintenance expenses incurred in providing service, and
project future expenses, recognizing changes in the number of
customers served and water use requirements as well as the
effects of continuing inflation on costs.
(3) Project Capital Requirements. Project study period capital
program requirements by applying an estimated inflation factor
on project costs to be provided by City staff.
A-8
)19
(4) Project Debt Service Requirements. Project debt service
requirements for principal and interest payments and reserves
on existing and any proposed bonded debt to meet capital
improvement requirements of the water system. Conduct
appropriate tests of revenue to ensure compliance with any
outstanding bond covenants.
(5) Analyze, Miscellaneous Revenue. Analyze and project miscellaneous
revenues for the study period based on financial records to be
furnished by the City. Recognize any capital contributions by
others as indicated by the City.
(6) Develop, Financing Plan. Develop a financing plan for the five
year study period based on projections of revenue under
existing rates and total revenue requirements of the water
utility. Revenue requirements would include operation and
maintenance expenses, routine annual capital additions and
replacements, debt service on existing and proposed bond
issues to the extent they are to be met from system revenues,
and all other costs associated with the operation of the water
utility. Show the changes in the level of revenue required on
a year by year basis.
(7) Prepare Report. Prepare 20 copies of a letter report summarizing
the findings and recommendations of the financial plan.
Review contents of letter report with City staff.
b. Phase II - Cost Allocation and Rate Design
(I) Allocate Revenue Requirements. Allocate the revenue requirements,
or total costs of service provided by the water utility, to
the various costs of service components which constitute a
functional classification of the different types of treated
water service that the utility provides to customers. Major
classifications of cost of service components include costs
which vary directly with the total quantity of water used,
costs associated with meeting peak water demands in excess of
the average rate of use, and costs which tend to vary in
proportion to the number of customers connected to the system.
(2) Establish Customer Classifications. Estimate the relative
accountability of each customer class system capacity, in
relation to use volume, and customer elements based upon
engineering experience and information available from utility
records. Customer classes may include (for service both
inside and outside the city limits) Residential, Commercial,
Industrial (if appropriate), Governmental, Private Fire
Protection, Public Fire Protection, and other special services
to the extent applicable.
A-9
(3) Distribute Costs. Distribute the functional component costs
among customer classes on the basis of the proportion of service
provided to each class (as determined from the customer class
characteristics) and the unit costs of service.
(4) Estimate Revenues. Estimate revenues anticipated from each
customer class under the existing schedules; compare the
revenues with the total cost of service allocation for each
class; and determine the adjustment in revenue required to
equitably distribute the total cost of service.
(5) Design Water Rates. Design a schedule of water rates to
recover revenues from customer classes generally in accordance
with allocated costs of service. The schedule would include
charges for the recovery of customer-related costs, for the
sale of water, and for private and public fire protection if
desired.
(6) Compare Revenue and Costs. Prepare a comparison of revenue
under the proposed cost-of-service rate schedule with cost
allocations by customer class which would indicate the percentage
of cost recovery.
(7) Prepare Typical Bills. Prepare a table of typical bills by
customer class, representative meter size, and water use which
compares monthly and bi-monthly bills under the existing and
the proposed cost-of-service rate schedule.
(8) Prepare Preliminary Report. Prepare a preliminary report
with appropriate tabular presentations summarizing the study
findings and recommendations. Present an adequate number of
reports to the City.
(9) Meet with City Staff. Meet with the City staff to review
study findings and to receive comments for completion of the
final report.
(10) Publish Report. Prepare a final rate report for presentation
to the City. Provide 30 copies of the report to the City.
C. DESIGN PHASE SERVICES
The design phase services consist of the design and preparation of
drawings and specifications for improvements to the water supply and
treatment facilities to increase design capacity from 8 mgd to 18 mgd.
The scope of work includes the following:
• Water Supply Wells (Contract No. 1) - Four additional wells
with 2 mgd pump capacity driven by electric motors. All wells
to have the same architectural treatment.
A-10
• Well Collector Lines (Contract No. 2) - Approximately 4,000 feet
of pipeline 12 to 24 inches in diameter.
• Water Treatment Plant Additions (Contract No. 3) - One 70 foot
square primary basin, one 88 foot square secondary basin,
four 24 x 19 foot filters, three 3500 gpm high service pumps
(to replace three existing pumps), chemical feed additions, a
1 MG below-ground water storage reservoir, yard piping to
provide a second high service connection to the distribution
system, and additional sludge lagoons at the site of existing
plant.
If some of the sizes and capacities listed above are changed as a result
of the study findings, the scope of work will not be considered changed,
provided the design capacity remains 18 mgd. However, Improvements
recommended by the Comprehensive Plan which are not listed in the scope
of work will be added to the contract for engineering services as part
of supplemental services. Examples of such items include induced draft
aerators, sludge dewatering equipment, engine-driven pumps, and distribution
system mains.
1. FIELD SURVEYS
a. Preliminary Tasks
(1) Review Sites. Compare well sites procured by the City for the
water system improvements and determine if they are different
from the sites recommended by the Facility Report.
(2) Locate Existing Utilities. Contact utilities which may have
improvements in the vicinity of the proposed project. Determine
availability of gas, electricity, and telephone services.
Locate potential conflicts with existing utilities during
construction of the water system improvements. Forward
information on utility locations to City surveyor for locating
in field.
b. Survey and Site Investigations
(1) Collect Survey Data. Communicate with City surveyor regarding
the data required for preparing drawings and specifications.
Actual surveys will not be performed by the Engineer unless
specifically authorized under supplemental services.
(2) Obtain Soil Boring Information. Provide assistance and
guidance in obtaining soil boring services and other exploratory
work, laboratory tests and analyses, and professional inter-
pretations of exploratory and test data. Actual soil borings,
laboratory work, and surveys will not be performed by the
Engineer unless specifically authorized under supplemental
services.
A-11
2. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
a. Preliminary Tasks
(1) Prepare Design Memorandum. Prepare design memorandum based
upon the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and dis-
cussions with City authorities. The design memorandum will
outline important design parameters and provide a general
description of the various components that make up the total
project.
(2) Distribute Design Memorandum. Distribute design memorandum to
City staff, Minnesota Department of Health, major equipment
suppliers, and other concerned parties for review and comment.
Meet with City and State to review design memorandum.
b. Water Supply Wells (Contract No. 1)
(1) Design Details. Design the detailed components of the
structural, architectural, mechanical, and electrical
components of the wells and well houses.
(2) Prepare Drawings. Prepare detailed drawings to be used for
construction of the wells and well houses.
(3) prepare Specifications. Prepare detailed specifications and
contract documents covering the construction of the wells and
well houses.
(4) Meet with City Staff. Meet with City staff to review contents
of drawings, specifications and contract documents.
c. Well Collector Line (Contract No. 2)
(1) Design Details. Design piping and layout route based on
survey data.
(2) Prepare Drawings. Prepare plan and profile drawings as well
as necessary details to be used for construction of the well
collector lines.
(3) Prepare Specifications. Prepare detailed specifications and
contract documents covering the construction of the well
collector line.
(4) Meet with City Staff. Meet with City staff to review contents
of drawings, specifications and contract documents.
d. Water Treatment Plant Additions (Contract No. 3)
(1) Design Details. Design the detailed components of the
structural, architectural, mechanical, and electrical components
of the water treatment plant additions.
A-12
(2) Prepare Drawings. Prepare detailed drawings to be used for
construction of the water treatment plant additions.
(3) Prepare Specifications. Prepare detailed specifications and
contract documents covering the construction of the water
treatment plant additions.
(4) Meet with City Staff. Meet with City staff to review contents
of drawings, specifications and contract documents.
e. Review and Quality Control
(1) Conduct Quality Control Review. Check calculations, drawings,
and specifications for completeness. Make corrections as
required.
(2) Prepare Opinion of Probable Cost. Prepare an opinion of
probable construction cost for the proposed work covered by
the drawings and specifications.
(3) Submit Documents to State. Submit drawings and specifications
to the State agencies having a regulatory interest in the
project. Meet with representatives of the State to discuss
drawings, specifications, and contract documents.
D. CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES
Engineering services during construction include bidding assistance
contract administration services, and shop drawing review. The tasks
included in the engineering services are described below.
1. BIDDING ASSISTANCE
(1) Prepare Bid Documents. Prepare bid forms and distribute
invitations to bid to prospective bidders and suppliers.
Reproduce drawings and specifications and issue to prospective
bidders and suppliers. Distribute plan holders' lists to
recipients of drawings and specifications prior to bid opening.
(2) Issue Addenda. Prepare and issue addenda during the bidding
period.
(3) Assist Evaluation of Bids. Be present to assist at bid
openings and aid in the analysis of the bids. Prepare bid
tabulations and recommendations on rejection or award of
contracts.
(4) Prepare Conformed Documents. Prepare conforming copies of
contracts. Review executed copies with City for conformance
with contract documents.
A-I3
2. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
(1) Review Shop Drawing Submittals. Review drawings, data, and
other information submitted by construction contractors for
general conformity and compliance with the contract drawings
and specifications. This information will be cataloged and
supplied to the City as part of the construction record.
(2) Visit Construction Site. Make periodic visits to the site of
the work during construction and consult with the City concerning
progress, and administer the project both in the office and
in the field.
(3) Assemble Operation & Maintenance Manual. Assemble operation
and maintenance information submitted by equipment manufactures
for use by the plant operating staff.
(4) Prepare Payment Estimates. Review with resident project
representative the payment requests submitted by the contractors.
Prepare payment estimates with the recommended payment amounts
for execution by the City.
(5) Interpret Documents. Interpret the meaning of the contract
documents as necessary.
(6) prepare Change Orders. Prepare change orders to the contract
documents as necessary.
(7) Observe Field Tests. Observe initial field tests of equipment.
(8) Arbitrate Disputes. Act as initial arbiter in disputes
between City and construction contractor.
(9) Prepare Conformed to Construction Records. Revise drawings
to conform to construction records and furnish one set of mylar
reproducible copies of revised drawings to the City.
E. RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATION
A resident project representative(s) will be provided during construction
if authorized by City. The duty of the resident project representative
will be to aid in carrying out the responsibilities of the Engineer at
the construction site. The tasks included in resident project represen-
tation are described below.
(1) Provide Resident Project Representative. At the option of the
City, furnish a full-time resident project representative and
such assistant resident project representatives as may be
required on the work who will assist and offer general guidance
in establishing horizontal and vertical control points, the
interpretation of the contract documents, and the making of
field checks of materials and equipment.
A-14
31
(2) Observe Construction Progress. During the course of the
contractor's performance of the job, the resident project
representative will conduct onsite observations of the general
progress of the work, will consult with the City and the
contractor, giving opinions and suggestions based on his
observations regarding defects or deficiencies in the contractor's
work and relating to compliance with drawings, specifications,
and design concepts. The resident project representative will
not have responsibility for the superintendence of construction
site conditions, safety, safe practices or unsafe practices or
conditions, operations, equipment, or personnel other than
employees of the Engineer. This service will in no way relieve
the contractor of complete supervision of the work or the
contractor's obligation for complete compliance with the
drawings and specifications. The contractor will have sole
responsibility for safety and for safe practices or unsafe
practices or conditions.
(3) Process Routine Field Administrative Work. The resident
project representative will also conduct the preconstruction
conference, review routine and final payment requests, and
make recommendations to the City regarding payments to the
contractor, and will report regularly to the City and to the
Engineer regarding the progress of the work.
(4) Adjust Time of Services to that Requested by Owner. The
actual time the services of the resident project representative
will be required and the number and duration of service of
assistant project representatives will be determined by the
City.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES
Any additional work requested by the City that is not included in one of
the task descriptions previously listed in Appendix A will be classified
as supplemental services. Supplemental services include but are not
limited to:
a. Additional meetings with State agencies to discuss the project.
b. Additional appearances at public hearings or 'before special boards.
c. Supplemental engineering work required to meet the requirements of
regulatory or funding agencies that become effective subsequent to
the date of this agreement. •
d. Special consultants requested or authorized by the City.
e. Assistance with bid protests, preparation for litigation, and
appearance in court.
f. Surveys and preparation of right-of-way or property descriptions
for use in obtaining easements.
A-15
33
g. Geotechnical engineering services, including exploratory work,
laboratory testing, and professional interpretations of exploratory
and test data.
h. Additions to an engineering report to update or revise original
recommendations.
i. Special services requested by the City for startup and fine tuning
of new processes. •
j. Laboratory testing during construction.
k. Observation of tests or retesting in addition to the initial tests
of equipment.
1. Evaluation of claims by construction contractors and others,
rendering opinions, and malting recommendations to the City.
m. Work recommended by the Comprehensive Plan but not specifically
included in Appendix A to the Contract for Engineering Services.
Examples of such items which may be recommended but are not included
in this Appendix A are induced draft aerators, mechanical sludge
dewatering, sludge pumping facilities, sludge pipeline facilities,
sludge landfill improvements, equipment and facilities recommended
by Energy Report, engine-driven pumps, distribution pipelines,
distribution system water storage facilities, landscaping, and
irrigation facilities.
n. Preparation of environmental assessments or impact statements required
for the project.
A-16
Date
Start Complete
Feb 1, 1985
Feb 1, 1985
Feb I, 1985
Feb 1, 1985
Sept 1, 1985
Feb 1, 1985
Feb 1, 1986
May 1, 1986
Aug 1, 1985
May 1, 1985
May 1, 1985
Aug 1, 1985
Dec 15, 1985
Feb 1, 1986
Sept 1, 1988
Sept 1, 1988
APPENDIX B
TO
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE 1
Work Element
Comprehensive Plan
Facility Report
Sludge/Aeration Report
Energy Report
Financial Report Phase I
Financial Report Phase II
Design Phase Services
Construction Phase Services
Resident Services
1 Schedule is based on expeditious review by City and regulatory agencies.
B-1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-13
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
FLYING CLOUD CENTER 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of Flying Cloud Center 2nd Addition has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie
Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of EdencPrairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Flying Cloud Center 2nd Addition
is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the
City Engineer's report on this plat dated January 2, 1985.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and
subdivision of the above named plat. .
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PROPOSAL:
HISTORY:
VARIANCES:
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members .
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician .Ao2
January 2, 1985
FLYING CLOUD CENTER 2ND ADDITION
Rott-Rivett Developers have requested City Council approval
of the final plat of Flying Cloud Center 2nd Addition
located north of West 78th Street and east of Flying Cloud
Drive in the North 1/2 of Section 14. The proposal is a
replat of part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Flying Cloud
Center containing approximately 5.4 acres, of which
approximately 1.3 Acres are intended for the construction
of a three story motel.
Zoning of 1.29 acres (Lot 1, Block 1) to C-Highway District
was finally read and approved by the City Council on
September 18, 1984, per Ordinance 43-84.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on
June 5, 1984, per Resolution 84-134.
Developer's Agreements referred to within this report were
executed on September 18, 1984, and September 12, 1984.
All variance requests not covered through the Developer's
Agreement must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
All municipal utilities and streets necessary to service
this site have been installed.
An option agreement for the possible purchase of an
easement for roadway access from West 78th Street to Leona
Addition was executed on September 12, 1984.
PARK DEDICATION: •
Park dedication requirements are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
BONDING:
The requirements for bonding are covered in the Developer's
Agreement.
Page 2, Final Plat Report for Flying Cloud Center 2nd Addition, 1/2/85
RECOMMENDATION'
Recommend approval of the final plat of Flying Cloud Center
2nd Addition subject to the requirements of this report,
the Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of
$936.00.
2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $540.00.
01.0:sg
cc: Harvy J. Rott
William Enright
3 '6
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-14
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
PROMONTORY RIDGE
WHEREAS, the plat of Promontory Ridge has been submitted in a
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and
under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been
duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for Promotory Ridge is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's
report on this plat dated January 3, 1985.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and
subdivision of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
9
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: • Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH:
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
FROM:
David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: January 3, 1985
SUBEJECT: PROMOTORY RIDGE
PROPOSAL:
The developer, Eden Prairie Hotel Company, has requested
City Council approval of the final plat of Promotory Ridge
located west of Flying Cloud Drive, north of 1-494 and east
of T.H. 5/169/212, in the South 1/2 of Section 11. The
site contains approximately 9.2 acres. Outlot A will
provide roadway access to the proposed lots and is to be
privately owned and maintained.
HISTORY:
Zoning to Commercial Regional Service District was finally
read and approved by the City Council on June 5, 1985, per
Ordinance 38-84.
A Registered Land Survey was approved by the City Council
on May 15, 1984, per Resolution 84-108.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report
was executed on June 5, 1984.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests not covered in the Developer's
Agreement must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
Outlot A is intended to contain the utilities and roadway
necessary to serve the proposed division. The utilities
installed within the Outlot are intended for municipal
maintenance and ownership although the roadway is to be
privately owned and maintained.
All utilities intended for City ownership will be installed
in conformance with City standarL's and procedures.
An ownership and maintenance agreement defining property
owner responsibilities for maintenance of the roadway must
be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to release
of the final plat. This document should also be recorded
with Hennepin County.
LIO
Page 2, Final Plat Promontory Ridge, 1/3/85.
PARK DEDICATION:
The requirements for park dedication are covered in the
Developer's Agreement and City Code.
1111
Prior to release of the final plat, bonding in conformance
with City Code requirements must be provided to the
Engineering Department to cover all utilities to be
publicly owned and maintained.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of the final plat of Promontory Ridge
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's
Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street .iign fee in the amount of $210.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of
$936.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $920.00.
4. Receipt of executed copy of access roadway maintenance
agreement.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirement.
DLO:sg
cc: Ms. Susan Hustad
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-15
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK SOUTH
WHEREAS, the plat of The Preserve Commercial Park South has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie
Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and ordinances of the City of Eden prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. Plat approval request for The Preserve Commercial Park
South is approved upon compliance with the recommendation
of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated January 2,
1985.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and
subdivision of the above named plat.
C. That the 'Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST ' SEAL
John D. Frane,—Crerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
David L. Olson, Senior Engineering Technician
January 2, 1985
THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK SOUTH
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
PROPOSAL:
The Preserve has requested final plat approval of the
Preserve Commercial Park South located south of Prairie
Center Drive and east of Flying Cloud Drive (T.H. 169/212),
in the south 1/2 of Section 14. The proposed division will
consist of 2 lots (3.15 acres) and 5 outlots. Outlots A, B
and C will comprise a private roadway with ownership and
maintenance responsibilities running to adjacent property
owners. Outlot D (containing approximately 6.1 acres) and
Outlot E (containing approximately 8.1 acres) will be
rezoned and replatted at later dates. Platting of Outlots
D and E will eliminate lengthy meets and bounds descrip-
tions.
HISTORY:
Second reading of Ordinances 133-84 (Youngstedt) and 136-84
(Rocky Rococo) zoning the property to Commercial Regional
Service is scheduled for January 8, 1985, City Council
meeting.
Preliminary Plats were approved by the City Council on
December 18, 1984, per Resolutions 84-320 (Youngstadt) and
84-325 (Rocky Rococo).
Resolutions 85-4 (Youngstadt) and 85-5 (Rocky Rococo)
summarize specific requirements for approval of the plat
and are scheduled for City Council approval on January 8,
1985.
VARIANCES:
All variance requests must be processed through the Board
of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS:
The developer has requested that the utilities installed
within the roadway (Outlots A, B and C) be owned and
maintained by the City. These utilities will be installed
in conformance with City standards and procedures.
Page 2, Final Plat The Preserve Commercial Park South, 1/2/85
The developer has also proposed private ownership and
maintenance of the access roadway. An agreement defining
.these responsibilities to the adjacent properties must be
submitted to the Engineering Department prior to release of
the plat. This document should also be recorded at
Hennepin County.
PARK DEDICATION:
Park dedication requirements are defined in the Summary
Resolution and Eden Prairie City Code.
BONDING:
Bonding in conformance with the City Code will be required
to cover all utilities proposed for municipal ownership and
maintenance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval :of the final plat of The Preserve
Commercial Park South subject to the requirements of this
report. Resolutions 85-4 and 85-5 and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee for $485.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee for $1,872.00.
3. Receipt of engineering fee for $250.00.
4. Receipt of copy of maintenance responsibility for
private access roadway.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
DLO:sg
cc: Larry Peterson, Preserve
Axel Dental Clinic
Mitchell Lake Estates 2nd Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 129-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #82-03 AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof. .
Section 2. That Ordinance #82-03 be amended by adding the following:
"Section 2. The property, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto
and made a part hereof, shall be and hereby is also subject to the
plans attached hereto and dated January 8, 1985.
"Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty
for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor"
are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though
repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the December 18, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published
at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of January,
1985.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
LI S
AXEL DENTAL OFFICE
Exhibit A
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Mitchell Lake
Estates,..2nd Addition, lying south of the
westerly extension of the most southerly line
of Lot 2, said Block 1, City of Eden Prairie,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
tao
Mitchell Lake Est. 211.!
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Ordinance No. 82-03
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows:
The property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota,
described as follows:
Lot 12, Block 2, Mitchell Lake Estates
shall be and hereby is removed from the Plan Study District
and shall be included hereafter in the Office District.
Section 2. The above-described property shall be subject to the
terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of
March 16 , 1982 between Karl F. Peterson, and the City of Eden
Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further
be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of
Eden Prairie relating to the Office District.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie on the 2 day of February, 1982, and finally read and adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City on the 16thday of March , 1982.
14.oygang/M. Aenzel, Mayor
er-41.,rrane, City Clerk
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie _News on the 25thday of March 1982.
111
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-1
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AXEL -DENTAL CLINIC
FOR RICHARD AXEL
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for a dental clinic by Richard Axel for
approximately an 8,000 sq. ft. structure, to be located in the southwest quadrant of
Highway #5 and County Road #4, is herein approved subject to the following specific
conditions:
I. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and grading
plan, dated January 8, 1985, all attached hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the City Engineer.
B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
C. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours prior to
grading.
D. Receive approval from the Board of Appeals for wood as a primary
building material for the structure.
E. Pay the required Cash Park Fee.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
ill
Christ Lutheran Church
Lake Trail Estates
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 131-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #78-33 AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof. , 'z
Section 2. That Ordinance #78-33 be amended by adding the following:
"Section 1. (d) The property, as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof, shall be and hereby is also subject
to the plans attached hereto and dated August 28, 1984.
"Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled 'General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty
for Violation' and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor"
are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though
repeated verbatim herein."
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the December 18, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published
at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of January,
1985.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
L/9
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH
Exhibit A
Outlot A, Lake Trail Estates, City
of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County,
Minnesota
c0
August 31, 1978
RAP
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 78-33
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS: •• •
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance 135 is amended as
follows:
(a) The property, described as Parcel 1 in Exhibit
A attached hereto and made a part hereof,
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be
included hereafter in the RN 6.5 District.
(b) The property, described as Parcel 2 in Exhibit
A
,) shall be and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be
included hereafter in the RN 6.5 District.
(e) The property, described as Parcel 3 in Exhibit
A
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be
included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District.
(d) The property, described as Parcel 4 in Exhibit
A,
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be
Included hereafter in the Public District. .
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to
the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated
as o f September 5, ,1978, entered into between
N.)
CLIFTON 3. SWENSON and ARVID W. SCHWARTZ
and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part
S I
Hd Penze4r777or
SEAL
ATTEST:
39fin D-rerane
City Clerk
V/
ma,c11_,
Published in the Eden Prairie News On the (0±/1 day of 1980.
Tri!4 ) 17!:t1t(%5' — •
.* .:0 ;c3 ,.:rt 31, )9i9
• Page Two
hereof and shall further be subject to all of
t
h
e
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
,
rules
and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie re
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
in which it shall be included hereafter.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from a
n
d
a
f
t
e
r
its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
of Eden Prairie on the 5 day of July 4978, and finally read
and adopted and ordered published at a regula
r
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council of said City on the 5 day of September ,1978.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0•7 That parr of thq East Half of the Southwest Quarter, Section 8, Township i16. Range '22, lytog a line erawo from a point on the North line of said Last Half of the Southwest Quarter distant 491.1 West from the Northeast corner thereof to a point on the center line of State Trunk Highway No. i distar. 5$.6 feet Wes: from the East line of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter, as measured a:t.n;! said ccnrer line, and lying North of the South One-fourth of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Duarte: - s_itd Section 3. except the North 113d feet as measured at right angles with the North line thvret.f. 'according to the Government Survey thereof. Also that part of the East Half of the Southwest Warzer Section 8, Township 116, Range 22, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line i th, Southwest Quarter 498.9 feet west of the center of said Section 8; thence west 498.9 feet: thence south to a point on the center line of State Trunk Highway Number 5 distant 1067.2 feet west of the east line of said S'mthwest Quarter as measured along said center line; thence easterly along said centr: a distarce at 533.6 feet; thence north to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the north 1138 feet as measured at right angles with the north line thereof, aCcoi'ding to the Government Survey thereof. Subject_ to a snow fence easement in favor of the State of Minnesota as set forth in the instron,ot recflrded in Book 2145 of Deeds, page 149; (See Order Doc No. 9322821. • %IS DEratt.7) CAD:117.1. ND 5VEYC25, Xx) worm, Lai,. He. Plygn7615 CU 538,41 Phone (211):42-r,43 hfrebY Ceft.fythjt thil IN. end correct reoretenurtion of a ;unary et the beimilerits of the dem described land gad Of th• location of an buildings. If any. thereon, and all visible oncrichments. if wee. from or on sted land At surveyed by Ltoi, 3da4f 4,07 loZ6 4.1671 1."*.i .P2).11:2_01. No. FileNc 1402-0 Book — Pace 17 - 6+ sc. . r • so• TOPOGRAPHIC ANI BOUNDARY SURVE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-2 •
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH EXPANSION
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for expansion of the Christ Lutheran Church of
approximately 2,400 sq. ft. to the existing 2,100 sq. ft. structure, to be located
In the northwest quadrant of Highway #5 and County Road #4, is herein approved
subject to the following specific conditions:
1. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and grading
plan, dated August 28, 1984, all attached hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the City fngineer.
B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
C. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours prior to
grading.
D. Pay the required Cash Park Fee.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Lake Heights 2nd Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 130-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #79-04 AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
-
Section 2, That Ordinance #79-4 be amended by adding the following:
"Section 1. (c) The property, as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof, shallbe and hereby is removed from
the RM-6.5 District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5
District.
"Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty
for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor"
are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though
repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the December 18, 1934, and finally read and adopted and ordered published
at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of January,
1985.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
LAKE HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
Exhibit A
Outlot.A, Lake Heights Addition, City of
Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Lake Hc•ighLs Addition
RAP
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 79-04
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended
as follows:
(a) The property, as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof,
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District
. and shall be included hereafter in the RM 6.5 District.
(b) The property, as set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto and made a part hereof,
shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District
and shall be included hereafter in the
R1-13.5
District.
Section 2. The above described property shall be subject
to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agree-
ment dated as of April 7 • 1981, entered into
between Universal Land Corporation, a Minnesota corporation,
and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby
made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all ordin-
ances, rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie
relating to the District in which it shall be included hereafter.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from
and after its passage and publication.
eZeL
o1fgang41. Penzel - Mayor
ATTEST:
On D. Frane - City Clerk
- 2-
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Eden Prairie on the 6 day of February
19 79 , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at
a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the
7th day of April 19 81 .
(SEAL)
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the 7th day
of M41
C Z
LAKE HEIGHTS ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:
Portion to be zoned RM 6.5
That potion of Outlot R, Lake Eden, lying North of the following
described line:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Outlot R, thence South- -
easterly along the Northwest line of Outlot R, a.distance of
625' Southwesterly to the point of R thence S 69 0 42'
03" E a distance gf 180', thence S 44 42' 03" E a distance of
200', thence N 35" 00' 00" E approximately 200' to the East
line of Outlot R and there terminating;
and
That portion of Outlot R lying Westerly of a line drawn parallel
to and 250' east of the East line of the North h of the South h
of the Northwest ki of Section 23 and Northerly of a line drawn
parallel to and 250' Northerly of the South line of the NW h of
Section 23.
Portion to be zoned R1-13.5
That portion of Outlot R, Lake Eden, Except the above described
portions.
s-9
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-3
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LAKE EDEN HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
FOR LAKE HEIGHTS VENTURES FOR FOUR SINGLE FAMILY
LOTS ON 1.85 ACRES
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Lake Eden Heights 2nd Addition by Lake Heights
Ventures for four single family lots on approximately 1.85 acres, located in the
southeast quadrant of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Homeward Hills Road, is herein
approved subject to the following specific conditions:
1. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and grading
plan, all dated October 17, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours prior
to any additional grading or tree removal on the site.
B. Pay the required Cash Park Fee.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
60
Youngstedt Service Center
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 133-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the C-Reg-Ser District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
C-Reg-Ser District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to
in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph 8, shall be, and are
amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 18th day of December, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of
January, 1985.
ATTEST:
J-6hn D. Frane, City Clerk Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
6 1
YOUNGSTEDTS
Exhibit A
1hot part of Una 8, itegislured land Survey No. 160, $1 Ins of the
Registrar of Mins, fkuniuoln County. Ninnosato. and iho Northoost Pi:actor
of lho Sevthwust Quartur of Suction 14. low6ship 116. Hungu 22, doss:MI.10d
as follows:
Commoncing at flus snothe:st coroor of said Northoost Quarter of the
Somthwost ()wrier; thuncn South 89 &woes S0 mlontos 57 woods
West. *vowed boils for hearings, 450.91 lout along thu south Ilan
of sold Nurthnnst Qunrtur ul thu Southwest Weirton thuocu Soulh 55
Ougruus 15 minutes OS sucends last, 109.10 tent to Hsu point of
boginning; Ihuncu southwesterly 04.94 lout, along n non-lan:pattlni
Curve. concave to the norlhwest, control angle 6I dugruos 31 mlnutus 12
Seconds. radius 70.00 lout, chord hearing South n4 dugrwus 30 minutes
30 soconds West; 1 -bunco seufhwosturly 87.9h fuut along a revered curve,
contra, anglu 50 llonrues 23 -minutes 59 seconds, radius 100.011 tout;
thence North 55 dogrous 15 minutes 05 sucunds Must. 264.73 feet; thence
northeastorly 63.04 foot along a non-tang...Mini curve, concwvo to tho
northwest, control angle 1 degrees 48 minutes 37 sucunds. radius - •
1994.86 foot: thence North 36 degrues 29 minutes 00 seconds East, 7.08
hot; thence North 84 dogrous 49 minutes 46 seconds East. 87.98 feet:
Ihence south 55 dugrees 15 minutes 05 seconds East, 299.13 foot to tho
point of beginning.
(002
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-4
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF YOUNGSTEDT SERVICE CENTER
IN PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Edenvale Executive Park by Welsh Construction,
for construction of two buildings, totalling 106,960 sq. ft. on approximately nine
acres, located in the southeast quadrant of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road, is
herein approved subject to the following specific conditions:
1. The revised development plans, all dated December 13, 1984, and attached
hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of:
1. A modified landscape/screening plan providing screening of
parking and loading areas.
2. Lighting and signage details.
3. Plans for screening of mechanical equipment.
4. Modified elevations showing continuation of brick further up
the exterior walls.
C. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
aprpoval of detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans.
D. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans to
the Watershed District for review.
E. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
3. Prior to future development, developer/owner shall submit a design framework
manual to the City for review and approval.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary PitiFson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
/03
Rocky Rococo
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA'
ORDINANCE NO. 136-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the C-Reg-Ser District.
Section 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,
and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
C-Reg-Ser District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to
in City Code, Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are
amended accordingly.
Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 18th day of December, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of
January, 1985.
ATTEST:
Jain D. Frane, City Clerk
Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
ROCKY ROCOCO
Exhibit A
That part of Tract 0, ROgtstered L
a
n
d
S
u
r
v
e
y
N
O
.
1
6
8
,
f
i
l
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
Registrar of ITtles, Itennopin County
,
1
4
I
n
n
e
s
0
t
e
.
d
e
s
c
r
t
b
e
d
A
s
1
0
1
1
0
5
5
1
Commencing It thu soothunst corno
r
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
u
a
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Southwest Quartor of Section 14, Tow
n
s
h
i
p
1
1
6
,
R
u
n
g
e
2
2
,
H
u
n
n
o
p
i
n
County, Nannosota: thonco South 89 d
e
g
r
o
o
s
5
0
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
5
7
S
O
C
O
O
d
S
M
o
s
t
,
assumed hosts for boarIngs, 450.91
t
o
o
t
a
l
o
n
g
1
1
1
u
s
o
u
t
h
I
t
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
Northeast Quarter of tho Southwest
Q
u
a
r
t
o
r
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
5
5
d
u
g
r
o
u
s
1
5
malautes 05 soceoUs Lust, 109.7h lout; 'lemon southwes
t
e
r
l
y
8
4
.
9
4
f
o
o
t
,
eftleg a non-tongentlaf Curve, COnCAVO to thu northwest. central dingle
69 dogroos 11 minutes 12 seconds
,
r
a
d
i
u
s
7
0
.
0
0
f
o
o
t
.
c
h
o
r
d
W
a
r
i
n
g
South 69 degruus 30 minutes 10 soco
n
d
s
W
o
w
?
;
t
h
o
n
c
o
s
u
u
t
h
w
u
s
t
u
r
l
y
9
4
.
9
1
lent along e revorso curve, centra
l
a
n
g
l
e
5
4
d
o
g
r
u
o
s
2
2
e
l
n
u
t
u
s
1
7
seconds, radius 100.00 foot; ihunc
o
S
o
u
t
h
4
9
d
o
g
r
u
o
s
5
)
e
l
n
u
t
o
s
3
0
sotonds West, 154.24 lout to Ulu p
o
i
n
t
o
f
b
o
g
i
o
n
i
n
g
;
t
h
o
n
c
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
n
g
South 49 dogroos 5$ minutes 30 so
c
o
n
d
s
M
o
s
t
.
3
0
0
.
0
0
f
t
.
.
,
?
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
N
o
r
t
h
40 dogmas 06 minutes 30 wounds
h
o
s
t
,
2
1
4
.
5
9
t
o
u
t
;
t
h
o
n
c
e
northoastorly 301.25 loot along a
n
o
n
.
t
a
n
g
o
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
r
y
°
,
c
o
n
c
a
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
• northwest, control angle 8 degro
e
s
3
4
l
o
l
n
u
t
o
s
0
8
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
,
r
a
d
i
u
s
1994.86 foot, chord bearing North 45 dogroos 18 &autos
2
2
s
u
c
c
e
d
s
Cost; thunco South 40 dogmas 00 m
i
n
u
t
e
s
1
0
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
C
a
s
t
,
2
3
8
.
6
5
f
o
o
t
to the point of boginning.
Gs
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-5
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ROCKY ROCOCO RESTAURANT
IN PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Rocky Rococo Restaurant for a 3,600 sq. ft.
restaurant on approximately 1.4 acres, located in the southeast quadrant of Highway
#169 and Medcom Boulevard, is herein approved subject to the following specific
conditions:
1. The development plan, preliminary plat, and erosion control and grading
plan, all dated December 13, 1984, and attached hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of:
1. A modified site plan which improves auto and pedestrian
access.
2. A modified landscape/screening plan which effectively
screens parking areas.
3. Lighting and signage details.
4. A design framework manual for development of the remainder
of the site.
5. Plans for screening of mechanical equipment.
C. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
aprpoval of detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans.
D. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans to
the Watershed District for review.
E. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Zohn D. Frane, City Clerk
Reynolds Printing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 134-84-PUD-13-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
.a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 13-84-
1-2-Park District (hereinafter "PUD 13-84-I-2-Park").
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 11, 1984, entered into between
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and the City of Eden Prairie
(hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") for Edenvale Industrial Park 9th Addition.
The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD 13-84-I-2-Park,
and is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD 13-84-I-2-Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide
Plan of the City.
B. PUD 13-84-I-2-Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable
and unified environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of
the City Code, which are contained in PUD 13-84-I-2-Park, are
justified by the design of the development described therein.
D. PUD 13-84-I-2-Park is of sufficient size, composition, and
arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is
feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent
unit.
Section S. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and
hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Planned Unit Development 13-84-I-2-Park District, and the legal descriptions of land
in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph
B, shall be and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter I entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
eltirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 18th day of December, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of
January, 1985.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary Peterson, Mayor
. PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
REYNOLDS PRINTING
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING
Part of Iract 8. IC015118E0 lANO SURVEY NO. 1354. files of the Resistrar of Mies.
Itermerin County, ginnetota. and part of Lot I. Mott 2, LOUVALE 4211100111011. accord.
1119 to the recorded plat thereof described es follows:
ifornenelne at the southeast corner of safd lot thence South 89
degrees 57 ninutes 41 seconds Vest. along the south line of sold lot 1,
distance of 80.28 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be
described: thence North 2 degrees 17 minutes 28 seconds Cast a dis-
tance of 37.52 feet: thence South 89 degrees 57 minders 41 seconds
Vest a distance of 514.23 feet; thence South 0 degrees 41 minutes 31
'Seconds Last a distance of 20.01 feet; thence Korth 89 degrees 57
Minutes 41 seconds East a distance of 682.25. feet; thence Netth 2
degrees 17 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 192.67 feet to said
plat of beginning. •
69
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-6
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF REYNOLDS PRINTING
IN EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 9TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Reynolds Printing for a 30,000 sq. ft.
structure on approximately three acres, located in the southeast quadrant of
Mitchell Road and Valley View Road, is herein approved subject to the following
specific conditions:
1. The revised development plans, all dated December 14, 1984, and attached
hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of:
1. A modified landscape/screening plan providing screening of
parking and loading areas.
2. Lighting and signage details.
3. Plans for screening of mechanical equipment.
C. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
aprpoval of detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans.
D. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans to
the Watershed District for review.
E. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
3. Concurrent with construction of the buildings, developer/owner shall
construct a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of the
public road along the property.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
110
Edenvale Executive Park
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 135-84-PUD-14-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE
ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 14-84-
1-2-Park District (hereinafter "PUD 14-84-I-2-Park").
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of June 11, 1984, entered into between
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and the City of Eden Prairie
(hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") for Edenvale Industrial Park 9th Addition.
The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD 14-84-I-2-Park,
and is hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD 14-84-I-2-Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Guide
Plan of the City.
B. PUD 14-84-I-2-Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable
and unified environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of
the City Code, which are contained in PUD 14-84-I-2-Park, are
justified by the design of the development described therein.
D. PUD 14-84-I-2-Park is of sufficient size, composition, and
arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is
feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent
unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and
hereby is, removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the
Planned Unit Development 14-84-I-2-Park District, and the legal descriptions of land
in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph
B, shall be and are amended accordingly. .
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and
Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 18th day of December, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered
. published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of
January, 1985.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
EDENVALE EXECUTIVE PARK
Exhibit A
LEAAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING 4
Port of 11.40 A. 2f615111110 1at9 SURVEY NO. 1364. files of the Registrar of Tit
l
e
s
.
Ughowpto (minty. rionPOtat fart of tot I, Block 2, atut part of Lot 1, ospet, I,
(DEMME 4111 th)11103 actordin, to the recellk ,t plat thereof: part of vacated
Valley Clew toad, as dedicated in said plat; and port of that portion of the East
nalf of the Southeast Waller of Section 10. laulthip 116 itarth. taupe 22 nest
lying northerly of saiJ renisttred land survey, easterly of said plat, and tooth- •
•erly of VIM, 0111111=4 laitS, &Melting to the recorded plat thereof. ell 1021.0
folly described as followS:
20arencing at the southeast corner of said Let 1, Clock 1, COMM 4711
20211Itt; thence South 49 degrees 57 minutes 41 second West, along the
south line of last s4id tot 1, a distance of 20.20 feet: thence north
2 degrees 17 minutes 76 records Ott a distance of 710.40 feet to the
southerly line of sold plat of ValLEY virm M=la WiES and the point
Of beolonlon or the land to he described; thence South 2 degrees 17
Minutes 26 seconds Vest a distance of 961.93 feet; thence easterly a
distance of 10.00 feet along a curve not tangent to last described
said curve is concave to the north. has a radius of 275.00
feet, a central angle of 2 degrees OS minutes 01 seconds, and chord
which tears South 06 degrees 60 minutes 03 seconds East; thence South
27 degrees 42 minates 34 seconds test, taitgent to sold curve, a dis.
.
Since of 466.90 feet; thence torth 0 degrees 36 minutes 16 seconds a
t
a
diStaArt Of 366.92 feet; thence northerly a distance of 81.O fret along
a tancential curve concave to the east having a radius of 1235.00 feet and
• central angle of 3 degrees 45 minutes 36 seconds:. thence north 4 d
e
g
r
e
e
s
21 minutes 52 Mends East, tangent to last described curve, a distance of
393.44 feet to raid southerly Vine of VALLEY VlEt 50201 IMES: thence west-
erly and northwosterly, along said Motherly line, to said point of
b
e
-
ginning.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-7
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF EDENVALE EXECUTIVE PARK
IN EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 9TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for Edenvale Executive Park by Welsh Construction,
for construction of two buildings, totalling 106,960 sq. ft. on approximately nine
acres, located in the southeast quadrant of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road, is
herein approved subject to the following specific conditions:
1. The revised development plans, all dated December 13, 1984, and attached
hereto shall apply.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and receive the Director's
approval of:
1. A modified landscape/screening plan providing screening of
parking and loading areas, which includes 132 21/2 inch
caliper trees.
2. Lighting and signage details.
3. Plans for screening of mechanical equipment.
C. Submit to the City Engineer, and receive the City Engineer's
aprpoval of detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans.
D. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans to
the Watershed District for review.
E. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance
of grading.
3. Concurrent with construction of the buildings, developer/owner shall
construct a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of the
public road along the property.
4. As part of the overall Planned Unit Development for the site, City grants
variance to allow for 65% office use within the two structures.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Jab U. Fran, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
January 8, 1985
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Or/ Bakke Insulation
GSB Investments
D. J. Kranz Co., Inc.
MN-TX
Wm. Poppenberger & Son
Pump & Meter Service
Sheehy Construction
Sunrise Properties, Inc.
J. B. Swedenborg Construction
W.H.W., Inc.
Welsh Companies
CONTRACTOR ( 1 & 2 FAMILY)
Brancale Construction, Inc.
Country Village, Inc.
Willard Eggan & Sons
Gary Properties, Inc.
Harvey. Homes, Inc.
Klink Construction, Inc.
Narr Construction, Inc.
Novak-Fleck, Inc.
David A. Williams Realty & Const.
Zachman Brothers Construction
HEATING & VENTILATING
Owens Services Corporation
R & S Heating & Air Cond.
Yale, Inc.
GAS FITTER
Yale, Inc.
PLUMBING
Consolidated Plumbing & Heating
Ford & Sons Plumbing Co.
Hokanson Plumbing
Randy Lane Plumbing
North St. Paul Plumbing & Heating
Piper Plumbing, Inc.
John Scherer Plumbing
State Mechanical, Inc.
Welter & Blaylock, Inc.
UTILITY INSTALLER
Hokanson Plumbing
State Mechanical, Inc.
SCAVENGER
Roto-Rooter
Schrader Block Co., Inc.
Sullivan's Services, Inc.
3.2 BEER ON SALE
Rocky Rococo
SOLICITOR
Freeman Hayes (Firewood)
REFUSE HAULER
Buckingham Disposal
Eden Prairie Trashtronics
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the
licensed ctivity.
ittk
Pat Solie, Licensing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-16
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, that the Eden Prairie News be designated as the official City
newspaper for the year 1985.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 8th
day of January, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
14
REI Eden Prairie
News
15716 West 78th Street
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
937-8690
.11\142
ro3
Mr. Carl Jullie
City Manager
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
January 2, 1985
Dear Mr. Jullie, mayor and council persons:
The Eden Prairie News hereby requests designation as the official
newspaper for the City of Eden Prairie public notices in 1985.
As you may know, the 1984 session of the Minnesota Legislature enacted
the Public Notice Reform Bill. This enactment caused many changes with
respect to the publication of public notices, commonly called "legals."
One of the more important changes in the law, which formerly allowed
the state to establish the line rate, is that newspapers are now allowed
to charge the equivalent of the lowest classified ad rate paid by
commercial users for comparable space.
Our lowest classified ad rate is $6 per column inch. We propose that the
legal rate for the City of Eden Prairie be $4.16 per column inch.
Subsequent insertions receive a 10-percent discount.
These rates represent an increase of 10 percent. The legal rates have no
t
increased since 1980, when the state allowed a 5.9-percent increase.
I might also note that the Eden Prairie News has met the guidelines which
the state has set for newspapers qualified to print public notices.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We hope we may continue to
be of service to the city.
Sincerely,
Mark Weber
Publisher
g ei
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-17
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY OFFICIALS TO
TRANSACT BANKING BUSINESS
BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager
and Treasurer of the City of Eden Prairie, be and they hereby are,
authorized to act for the City in the transaction of any banking
business with the official depositories (hereinafter referred to as the
banks), such authority including authority on behalf of or in the name
of the City from time to time and until written notice to the bank to
the contrary, to sign checks against said account, which checks will be
signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. The bank is hereby
authorized and directed to honor and pay any check against such account
which is signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable
to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, any officer or officers
of the City including the signer or signers of the check.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Acting Mayor be authorized to sign
checks as an alternate for the Mayor, the Deputy Treasurer be authorized
to sign checks as an alternate for the Treasurer.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 8th
day of January, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
781
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-18
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES
BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
BE IT RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the
following persons:
Gary Peterson, Mayor
and
John D. Frane, Treasurer or Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
on checks, drafts, warrant-checks, warrants, vouchers or other orders on
public funds deposited hereby is approved, and that each of said named
persons may authorize the depository bank to honor any such instrument
bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to
charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn,
as fully as though it bore his manually written signture, and that
instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of
said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall be affixed
without his authority.
ADOPTED by the City Council on this 8th day of January, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-19
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Suburban National Bank of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, and the First State Bank of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are
designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of
Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. The City Treasurer shall
maintain adequate collateral for funds in the depository.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on this 8th
day of January, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
ZO
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-20
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER TO INVEST
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
County of Hennepin, that the City Treasurer is authorized to invest City
of Eden Prairie funds with any bank, or other financial institution
authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota in Certificates of
Deposit, U.S. Government Notes and Bills, obligations of the State of
Minnesota or any of its subdivisions, Federal Government Agency Bonds
and Notes, Savings Accounts and Repurchase Agreements and any other
security authorized by law. The City Treasurer shall maintain adequate
collateral for funds deposited.
ADOPTED by the City Council on this 8th day of January, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
North Bay of Timber
Lakes 2nd Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 140-84
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE #326, AND,
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2. That Ordinance #326 be amended by adding the following:
"Section 2. That the property, as set. forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be and hereby is also
subject to the plans dated December 13, 1984, reviewed and approved
by the City Council December 18, 1984.
"Section 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty
for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor"
are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though
repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3.
passage and publication
FIRST READ at
Prairie on the December
at a regular meeting
January,1985.
ATTEST:
This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
18, 1984, and finally read and adopted and ordered published
of the City Council of said City on the 8th day of
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Gary Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
Legal Description for North Bay of Timber Lakes 2nd Addition
Lot 8, Block 1, NORTH BAY OF TIMBER LAKES, Hennepin County, Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 326
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135.
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Appendix A or Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to
Section 17, Township 116, Range 22 as follows:
All that part of Government Lot 2, Section 17, Township 116, Range 22,
Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the east line of said Government Lot 2, distant
511.50 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence
southerly, along the said east line, to the southeast corner of said
Lot 2; thence westerly, along the south line, to the southwest corner
of said Lot 2; thence northerly and easterly, along the shore line of
Mitchell Lake, to the west line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 17;
thence northerly, along said west line, to the southwest corner of the
North 511.50 feet of the West 1/2 of the said Northeast' 1/4; thence
easterly to the point of beginning and Government Lot 3, Section 17,
Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the following
described tracts to wit:
1. Beginning at a point on the east line of .said Government Lot 2, distant
511.50 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on
an assumed bearing of S 0 00830" W, along said east line, 927.73 feet;
thence S 88 0 56'10" W a distance of 238.47 feet; thence on a tangential
curve to the left a distance of 393.32 feet, radius of said curve is
590.89 feet; thence N 37 0 33 1 50" W, not tangent to last described curve,
233.61 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the left for a distance of
62.38 feet, radius of said curve 468.53 feet; thence N 25°52'36" E, not
tangent to said curve, 145.60 feet; thence N 3 0 51 1 57" W to its inter-
section with the shore line of Mitchell Lake; thence westerly, along
said shore line, to its intersection with the west line of the North-
east 1/4 of said Section 17; thence northerly, along said west line, to
the southwest corner of the North 511.50 feet of the West 1/2 of the
said Northeast 1/4; thence easterly to the point of beginning;
2. Commencing at a point on the east line of said Government Lot 2, distant
511.50 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 2;
thence on an assumed bearing of S 0 0 0830" W, along said east line,
927.73 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence S 88 °56'10" W a
distance of 238.47 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the left a
distance of 730.07 feet, radius of said curve is 590.89 feet; thence
N 59°10'45" W, not tangent to'said curve 314.15 feet; thence $ 85°56'27" W
a distance of 227.84 feet; thence S 71 0 1846" W to its intersection with
the shore line of Mitchell Lake; thence southerly and southwesterly, along
said shore line, to its intersection with the south line of said Government
Lot 3; thence casterly, along said south line, to the southeast corner of
said Government Lot 3; thence northerly, along the east line of said
Government Lot 3, to the actual point of beginning.
Urdiltau,t Nu.
Pemtom, Inc.
Page 2
which property shall be and hereby is removed from rural and R.M. 2.5
zone and shall be included in the R.I. 13.5 zone.
That part of Government Lots 2 and 3, Section 17, Township 116,
Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the east line of said Government Lot 2,
distant 511.50 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said
Government Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of S 0 °08'30" W,
along said east line, 927.73 feet to the actual point of beginning;
thence S 88°56'10" W a distance of 238.47 feet; thence on a tangential
curve to the left a distance of 730.07 feet, radius of said curve
is 590.89 feet; thence N 0 59°10'45" W, not tangent to said curve,
314.15 feet; thence S 85 56'27" W a distance of 227.84 feet; thence
S 71 °18'46" W to its intersection with the shore line of Mitchell
Lake; thence southerly and southwesterly, along said shore line,
to its intersection with the south line of said GovernAnt Lot 3;
thence easterly, along said south line, to the southeast corner
of said Government Lot 3; thence northerly, along the east line •
of said Government Lot 3, to the actual point of beginning, except
the North 330 feet of the South 693 feet of the East 165 feet.
which property shall be and hereby is removed from rural zone and shall be
included in the R.M. 6.5 zone.
Section 2.
The above described property shall be subject to the terms and
conditions of that certain rezoning agreement dated ,1976,
entered into between PEMTOM, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and the
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, of the State of Minnesota,
which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject
to all of the ordin3nces, rules and regulations of the City relating to
such R.I. 13.5 District and R.N. 6.5 District, respectively.
Section 3.
This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and
publication.
I S
Oldinantc•
Pcmtom, Inc.
Page 3
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie this 11th day of May, 1976; and finally read and adopted
and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City on the 25 day of May ,1976.
PO,
Wo gan Pe el, Mayor
ATTEST:
- ,.. i 1 1 I --
City Clerii.John D. Frane
,
Published in the on ,1976.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-23
A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
OF COUNCIL APPROVAL OF NORTH BAY OF TIMBER LAKES
2ND ADDITION FOR RICHARD MILLER HOMES, INC. FOR EIGHT
MULTIPLE FAMILY UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 9.34 ACRES
BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal for North Bay of Timber Lakes 2nd Addition for
Richard Miller Homes, Inc., for two lots for eight multiple family units and one
outlot on approximately 9.34 acres, located in the northwest quadrant of County Road
#4 and Timber Lakes Drive, is herein approved subject to the following specific
conditions:
I. The development plans all dated December 13, 1984, and attached hereto shall
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer/owner shall:
A. Submit a detailed mass landscaping plan for review.
B. Submit a detailed grading plan for review.
C. Submit a detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plan to
the City Engineer and Watershed District for review.
D. Pay the required Cash Park Fee.
ADOPTED by the City Council on January 8, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
vi
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-8
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CARDINAL CREEK VILLAGE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for
the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Cardinal Creek Village Planned Unit Development Concept is
considered a proper Planned Unit Development Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
request of Chimo Development for PUD Concept approval for Cardinal Creek Village and
recommended approval of the PUD Concept to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the request on January 8, 1985;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Cardinal Creek Village PUD Concept, being in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval to the
Cardinal Creek Village Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined
in the revised application materials for Cardinal Creek Village,
dated December 26, 1984, and supporting material dated December 4,
1984.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated December 10, 1984.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 8th day of January, 1985.
"diFi—Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
TOITTD. Frane, City Clerk
?I
December 3, 1984
TO: Eden Prairie Planning Commission
FROM: Cardinal Creek Homeowners' Association
COPIES: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chimo Development Corp.
PROJECT: Proposed Cardinal Creek Village
' SUBJECT: Traffic Study performed by Benshoof & Associates
Technical Deficiencies
Benshoof and Associates was retained by Chimo Development
Corp. to prepare a traffic impact study in support of the
proposed Cardinal Creek Village multi—unit development. The
findings of this study were presented at the most recent
Planning Commission hearing as follows:
1. The planned 316 unit apartment/condo project will
result in decreased traffic along the present Cardinal Creek
Road.
2. The accuracy of this study is 10-15%, based on direct
testimony of the developer's consultant.
The residents of Cardinal Creek have a sincere concern
that traffic will increase along present Cardinal Creek
Road, resulting from the proposed development, creating a
highly unsafe condition for residents, especially children.
For this reason, any traffic study of the new project should
be unbiased and of high technical quality. Review of the
traffic study performed by Senshoof and Associates and
submitted by the proposed developer, indicates such
significant technical deficiency, as to render it of little
or no value in assessing the significant risk to public
safety inherent in the proposed plan.
The residents of Cardinal Creek respectfully request the
consideration of the Planning:Commission and city planners
be directed at the following study deficiencies.
I. The study is based upon the premise that 65% of
traffic heads north on Baker Road from the Cardinal Creek
area; the remaining 35% south into Eden Prairie. This
assumption is based upon a study projecting conditions in
the year 2000, the specifics of which were not disclosed by
Benshoof upon direct inquiry by the Planning Commission
members.
2. The study appears to be based only on driving
distances, which are minimal. No consideration whatever Is
given to the more important factor of traffic congestion
caused by•dver 300 apartments, which will force traffic
south through the present single family area.
3. Assuming construction of the proposed development, the
area between Baker Road and the development will likely also
be committed to higher density residential uses. The
traffic study takes no accouint of the resulting traffic
congestion, which would force even more traffic to the
southern Cardinal Creek Road access.
4. Trip generation rates are based on the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Informational Report revised in
1982. This report references "public transportation" as one
factor in their data. The proposed development is served
only by automobile. The Benshoof traffic study indicates
that only 40< of the proposed units would initiate a rush
hour automobile trip, yet the majority of units would be
occupied by individuals or couples below age 65, with no
children, most of whom would work. The lack of public
transportation and occupancy pattern indicate rush hour
volumes more than twice that claimed bY the developer.
Requested Response:
Based upon the above study deficiencies and the potential
threat to public safety, we request the following:
I. The performance of a traffic study by an impartial and
qualified organization.
2. Consideration of a limited access link between the
proposed development and Cardinal Creek Road, open only to
public vehicles for emergency use.
3. Alternatively, significant road deviation between
Cardinal Creek and the proposed development, including
consideration of "one way road section", limiting signage,
etc. The proposed plan provides for no road deviation
whatever.
4. Significantly reduce project size and unit density,
and move development as far as possible to the north.
Eliminate new construction from south of new road extension
to improve transition.
5. Require the developer to first construct the new north
connection to Baker Road prior to any building development,
so that all construction traffic will enter via that route.
Prohibit access to the site through the present Cardinal
Creek Road.
0) 0
We of the Cardinal Creek Homeowners' Association
appreciate your consideration in this important matter.
BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND ENG
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 1191 ED
E
N
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
5
5
3
4
4
1
(
6
1
2
)
944-7590
December 4, 1984
REFER TO FILE: 83-34-60
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Hoisington - rsing
t
o
n
G
r
o
u
p
,
I
n
c
.
FROM James A. BenshooVand M
i
c
h
a
e
l
L
.
W
o
n
s
o
O
t
O
U
)
SUBJ: Updated Traffic Study f
o
r
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
The purpose of this memorandu
m
i
s
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
u
r
r
e
p
o
r
t
o
f
November 8, 1984 concerning t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
Village. At the Eden Prairie
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
o
f
November 13, 1984 questions w
e
r
e
r
a
i
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
City staff, and residents re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
the proposal on existing Car
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
,
m
o
s
t
p
a
r
-
ticularly, the estimated tri
p
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
f
o
r
o
u
r
traffic forecasts.
In order to respond to these
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
,
w
e
h
a
v
e
a
c
c
o
m
p
l
i
s
h
e
d
the following tasks:
• Analyzed the results of an e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
s
u
r
v
e
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
the City in May, 1984.
• Revised the trip generation f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
s
t
o
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
f
o
r
refinements to the developmen
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
.
• Obtained turn movement counts
a
t
t
h
e
B
a
k
e
r
R
o
a
d
/
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
Creek Road intersection durin
g
t
h
e
p
.
m
.
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
.
• Calculated travel distances a
n
d
t
i
m
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
of proposed access onto Raker
R
o
a
d
t
o
1
-
4
9
4
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
.
• Updated development trip fore
c
a
s
t
s
.
The results of these work tas
k
s
a
r
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
the
following sections.
012
Fred Hoisington -2- December 4, 1984
EMPLOYMENT SURVEY
The City of Eden Prairie and the Eden Prairie Chamber of
Commerce conducted an employment survey in early 1984 to
determine the residential location of Eden Prairie employees.
Data published in May, 1984 which accounted for approximately
44% of the 20,000 current employees in the City indicates
approximately 15% of all employees working in Eden Prairie
live in the City. It can be assumed from this survey that
approximately the same percentage (15%) of the residents in
Cardinal Creek Village would work in Eden Prairie.
REVISED TRIP GENERATION
The development has been refined from that previously pro-
posed. The current proposal consists of 256 apartment/
condominium units and 24 two family dwelling units.
Utilizing trip generation rates published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers, 1983, we estimate that total daily
traffic generated by the development would be 1,800 vehicle
trip ends, as compared to 1,890 vehicle.trip ends from the
previous proposal.
TURN MOVEMENT COUNTS
In order to gain a better understanding of existing trip
distribution characteristics, turn movement counts were taken
at the intersection of Baker Road and Cardinal Creek Road on
November 29, 1984 from 4:20 to 5:30 p.m. These counts, which
recorded all trips into and out of Cardinal Creek Road by
direction, showed that 52% of all trips used Baker Road to
and from the north, while 48% traveled Baker Road to and from
the south. It is expected that this 52.48 directional
distribution is valid on 24-hour basis, as well as during the
p.m. peak period, because the types of trips that occur
during the p.m. peak period are not all work trips, but
include a good balance of other types of trips that occur
throughout the day (e.g. from school, to/from shopping, and
to/from recreational).
After completion of County Highway 62 between Shady Oak Road
and 1-494, it is expected that the percentage of trips bet-
ween Cardinal Creek Road and the north on Baker Road will
increase. The reason for this expected increase is the
improved accessibility provided to areas such as the Opus 2
development, City West development, and communities such as
Hopkins, Edina, Richfield, and Minneapolis. In this context,
we believe that the proportion of trips to and from the north
on Baker Road will increase by about 13 percentage points,
creating the 65-35 directional distribution presented in our
report dated November 8, 1984.
0
Fred Hoisington -3- December 4, 1984
TRAVEL DISTANCES AND TIMES
As a further check on the trip distribution percentages, a
travel distance and time survey was conducted on two dif-
ferent routes between the site and the east on 1-494. This
survey was performed on November 29, 1984, from 3:00 to 4:15
p.m. The first route involved proceeding south on Baker Road
from Cardinal Creek Road to Valley View Road to Plaza Drive
to T.H. 5 to 1-494 eastbound. The return segment of this
route was the exact opposite. The second route entailed pro-
ceeding north on Baker Road from the location of the proposed
northerly access of Cardinal Creek Village to County Road 67
to 1-494 southbound to the same point on 1-494 as the first
route. Again, the return segment was the exact opposite of
this route.
This analysis revealed that the first route (southerly) was
.2 mile longer round trip then the northerly route and
required an average of 11 minutes 30 seconds to complete the
round trip. The northerly route required an average of 9
minutes to complete the round trip (22 percent less travel
time).
From these data it can be concluded that the northerly route
(Baker Road to County Road 67 to 1-494) is the preferred
route for destinations to the east along 1-494. It should be
noted that during one of the runs on the northerly route, a
vehicle exited Cardinal Creek Road and proceeded north on
Baker Road to travel south/east on 1-494.
UPDATED TRAFFIC FORECASTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Utilizing the updated development and trip generation sta-
tistics, the traffic assignment was revised. As noted in a
report dated November 8, 1984, our traffic projections
account for full development of the proposed Cardinal Creek
Village development, as well as the nearby Cardinal Creek 2nd
and 3rd subdivisions.
Based upon this analysis and the preceeding analyses, we are
confident that about 65% of the development trips will uti-
lize Baker Road to/from the north upon completion of the
Crosstown. In order to account for a "worst case" condition,
traffic volumes also were projected based upon a distribution
of 55% to/from the north on Baker Road and 45% to/from the
south.
Fred Hoisington -4- December 4, 1984
If Cardinal Creek Road is not connected with the roadway
system in tpe Cardinal Creek Village site, the projected
daily volume on Cardinal Creek Road just. east of Sandridge
Road is 710 vehicles per day (the same volume as presented in
our report dated November 8, 1984). If Cardinal Creek Road
Is extended into the Cardinal Creek Village site, the pro-
jected volume on this roadway just east of Sandridge Road
would be 645 vehicles per day with a 65-35 directional
distribution and 705 vehicles per day with a 55-45 direc-
tional distribution.
• The above projections are consistent with our statements at
the Planning Commission meeting on November 13, 1984, that
the future volume on Cardinal Creed Road east of Sandridge
Road will be lower if this roadway is extended through the
Cardinal Creek Village site than if no connection is made to
Cardinal Creek Village.
BENSHOOF AND ASSOCIATES
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS
7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 119/ EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 / (012) 944-7590
November 8, 1984
REFER TO FILE: 83-34-60
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Hoisington - Hoisington Group, Inc.
FROM: James A. Benshoof
SUBJ: Traffic Study for Cardinal Creek Village
PURPOSE
In accordance with your request, we have completed a traffic
Study for the proposed Cardinal Creek Village. The purpose
of this study basically has been threefold:
• To project the amount of traffic that would be generated
by the proposed development, in comparison to the two
adjacent Cardinal Creek subdivisions.
• For the proposed development and two adjacent Cardinal
Creek subdivisions, to project the total volume of deve-
lopment traffic by roadway segment.
• To analyze alternative local roadway solutions and to
determine the ability of the roadway system to accom-
modate the total projected volumes.
This memorandum documents the work we have performed and our
resultant conclusions.
DEVELOPMENT AND TRAFFIC FORECASTS
The site for Cardinal Creek Village is located east of Baker
Road (County Highway 60), west. of 1-494, and north of
existing Cardinal Creek Road. As we understand, the proposed
development would consist of 276 apartment/condominium units
and 40 townhouse units. Further, we understand that the long
range intent is for all 316 dwelling units to be owner
occupied, but that some of the apartment/condominium units,
depending on specific market conditions at time of comple-
tion, may initially be available for rent. In this context,
a conservative approach has been taken in the traffic analy-
siS in tt ,rms of assuming that all 276 apartment/condominium
9 (49
Fred Hoisington -2- November 8, 1984
units will be rental properties; this approach is
c
o
n
s
e
r
-
vative because rental units have a higher trip ge
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
rate (6.1 daily vehicle trip ends per unit) than o
w
n
e
r
occupied units (5.2 daily vehicle trip ends per un
i
t
)
.
In order to effectively address the total develop
m
e
n
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
on nearby roadways, it is important to account fo
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
-
posed development and for nearby Cardinal Creek s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
which previously were approved and which are unde
r
g
o
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
-
lopment. Figure 1 illustrates the five analysis sub-areas
and the associated development statistics and pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
d
a
i
l
y
vehicle trip ends. Major points illustrated in this figure
Include:
• Sub-areas 1 - 3 encompass the complete proposed C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
Creek Village development. As shown, the density
i
s
c
o
n
-
centrated in the northern portion of the site.
• The development statistics for sub-areas 4 and 5
a
r
e
f
o
r
the full planned development in those previously
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
Cardinal Creek subdivisions.
• The projected daily vehicle trip ends were deter
m
i
n
e
d
b
y
multiplying the development statistics by the ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
trip generation rates as published by the Instit
u
t
e
o
f
Transportation Engineers.' These rates, which a
r
e
t
h
e
result of traffic counts at numerous comparable
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
-
ments, are as follows:
Type of Development
Single Family or Two Family
Apartment
Townhouse
Daily Vehicle Trip Ends
Per Dwelling Unit
10.0
6.1
5.2
It is important to note that 80 percent of the tri
p
s
generated by the Cardinal Creek Village developmen
t
w
o
u
l
d
be destined to/from the northern portion of the si
t
e
,
near the proposed new access point to Baker Road.
The next step is to project the directiorial distr
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
trips to/from the study area.. Based upon traffic
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
developed by the Metropolitan .Council, it is est
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
65 percent of the development trips will be orien
t
e
d
t
o
/
f
r
o
m
the north on Baker Road and 35 percent to/from t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
(
s
e
e
Figure 2). One major reason for the predominant
o
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
1 "Trip Generation," Institute of Transportation E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
,
19B2.
(49
0 400'
Approx. Scale
Inal pa ow
240 Apartments
9 Townhouses .
1,510 Daily Trip Ends
36 Apartments
23 Townhouses
'1 340 Daily Trip Ends? •
areirwiwi.
8 Townhouses
Holly
Road
t.r.c
; 32 Two Family
i Dwelling
Units
3 J320 •
nr11
(3.
‘4.
•I 39 Single Family
Dwell ing Units
1 190 flily Trip
y r CHIMO DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION .
N:;11001 - AND A;;OCIA If
TRAIT' IC STUDY
FOR
CAR D I NAI CR1 I );
V II I Mir
r IGIIRE I
;•I
Am n D;,I1) IP I.' I NDS
41
V
0
{ putsjr.!N't 1 A' :',' c .... ..., • ,
CIIIMO Di VELMENT
CORPORA1 ON 1RAff1C STUOY
F OP
N NA t ty!!
V ;11 AGF
1RIP OlSIRIBUT ION FOR
CARDINAL CREEK
01 VII OPMENT
0)1
Fred Hoisington -5- November 8, 1984
to/from the north is the close proximity of the I-494/Baker
Road interchange. By the end of 1986, County Highway 62 will
be extended to this interchange, providing excellent accessi-
bility to and from the east.
Two observations relating to the trip distribution shown in
Figure 2 are:
• Primary orientation of Cardinal Creek Village traffic to
the new northerly access point to Baker Road, with lesser
orientation via existing Cardinal Creek Road.
• Opportunity for residents in the adjacent Cardinal Creek
Third Subdivision (e.g. along Stonewood Court) to use the
new road and access point to Baker Road, relieving usage
of existing Cardinal Creek Road.
Utilizing the preceding trip generation and distribution pro-
jections, development traffic was assigned to two alternative
roadway systems. As shown in Figure 3, one alternative would
involve connecting Cardinal Creek Road to a new roadway in
the Cardinal Creek Village site. The second alternative
would involve no connections between Cardinal Creek Road and
the proposed development. The first alternative is con-
sistent with prior City planning, would eliminate the
existing long cul-de-sac on Cardinal Creek Road, and would
avoid creating a long cul-de-sac to serve Cardinal Creek
Village. As shown in Figure 3, the total development traffic
volumes on Cardinal Creek Road will be 10 percent lower if
Cardinal Creek Road is extended into the new development site
(Alternative 1) than if this road is not extended
(Alternative 2). This resultant volume forecast was deter-
mined by summing the volumes for each of the five analysis
sub-areas for Alternative 1 (see Figure 4) and for
Alternative 2 (see Figure 5).
160
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
CARDINAL CREEK
VILLAGE
f.LOPmEN1 VOLUMES
WilOW CARDIN;,I
CREEK ROAD fX1ENDID
CNIMO DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
11(
FIGURE 3
); Iv AND A:;!.;()CIATrr,
SOLUTION WITH CARDINAL
CREEK ROAD EXTENDED
SOLUTION WITH CARDINAL
CREEK ROAD NOT EXTENDED
1685
(1685) LEGEND
1965 Development Vehicle Trips Per
Day With Cardinal Creek Rd.
Extended (see Fig. 4)
(1890) Development Vehicle Trips Per
Day Without Cardinal Creek
Rd. Extended (see Fig. 5) 860
(1125)
915
915
635
I; (710)
l!Tr4:‘,1ioor nut) A!Y .,c ,c:tA lEr 1
CIII MO DEV1LOPMENT
CORPORATION TRAIT IC SIIMY
F OR
C ARD ItAI . IRI I
AI;I
10- d
T IGOR!' 4 (511f ET 1 or ? )
11A
It Vi i P1 13
W ii Ft ( DI %P..; I.P1.1 (*.
CO :11$ 5;1 A
1 AN; 4 A':'-.()cinli.
CHIMO DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION TRArEIC STUDY
rOR
CAR;;;WI. MIK
vl!!Ar'l
103
rIGURE 4 (SHEET 2 OF 2)
DAIIY VEHICLE TRIPS
WITH CARDINAL CREEK
ROAR EXTENDED
TOTAL. CARDINAL CREEK TRAFFIC
(SUM OF 1-5)
32 Two-Family DU's
320 Daily Trio Ends
-4v
---' 140 Da i 1 y
Trip Ends
1.0n106
CHI MO Di V. L OPME NI
CORPORAI ION
.*.i1 I!'•
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
CARDINAL CREF K
V ILL AGE
loll
FIGURE 5 (SHEET 1 OF 2,
ff1111 "'
IFIGURE 5 (SHEET 2 OF 2) 1. :1 tq!:1 I( )01 AM) •
yabooMMIn11
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR
CARDINAL CREEK
VILLAGE
IOS
CHIMO DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
TOTAL CARDINAL CREEK TRAFFIC
(SUM OF 1-5)
32 Two-Family DU's
320 Daily Trip Ends
39 Single Family DU's
390 Daily Trip Ends
Fred Hoisington -11- November 8, 1984
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
In analyzing the ability of the public roadway system to
accommodate the development traffic, two particularly impor
-
tant considerations are the effects on existing Cardinal
Creek Road and the ability of the access points on Baker Ro
a
d
(existing Cardinal Creek Road and new northerly access
roadway) to serve the projected volumes. In terms of the
first point, the traffic forecasts have shown that existing
Cardinal Creek Road will have less traffic with the proposed
development and roadway system than without any connection to
the Cardinal Creek Village site. Therefore, it is concluded
that the proposed development will have no adverse traffic
effect on the neighborhood to the south, but rather will have
a beneficial effect in terms of a slight reduction in volumes
and improved accessibility by eliminating the existing long
cul-de-sac on Cardinal Creek Road.
Two important items regarding the ability of Baker Road to
serve development traffic are the volumes and planned impro-
vements. According to Hennepin County Traffic Flow maps, th
e
existing volume on this segment of Baker Road is 4,600
vehicles per day and is projected to increase to 7,000
vehicles per day by year 2000. In order to effectively
accommodate the existing and projected traffic and to resolv
e
the existing curvature difficulties, the County plans to
upgrade Baker Road between County Road 39 and County Road 67
in 1987. This improvement would include widening of the
roadway to four lanes. With this schedule, only about 1/3
o
f
the Cardinal Creek Village units will be completed and
occupied prior to completion of the Baker Road improvements
.
Considering the above points, the quality of traffic opera-
tions at the intersections of Baker Road with Cardinal Cree
k
Road and with the new northerly access roadway have been an
a
-
lyzed. Our conclusion is that these intersections will pro-
vide safe and effective traffic operation with just stop sign
control on Cardinal Creek Road and on the new, northerly
access roadway. No significant delays or "back-up" of traf-
fic are expected to occur at these intersections. One reason
for this conclusion is that most of the trips leaving the
Cardinal Creek Village development would make right turns
onto Baker Road, a movement that would involve minimal
conflict with traffic on Baker Road.
Based on all of the traffic data and analyses presented in
this report, our overall conclusion is that the proposed
Cardinal Creek Village development and roadway system will
have no adverse traffic effects on the local roadway system
or on nearby developments.
JAB/mt
io(0
0 0
armo Tvells,772.2Tat ecrpernevn
October 31, 1984
Floyd E. Sieffeman, Jr.
CARDINAL CREEK HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
6997 Edgebrook Place
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
RE: Cardinal Creek Village (PUD)
Dear Mr. Siefferman:
Enclosed is the traffic study you've requested for Cardinal
Creek Village. We will also send this information to Chris
Enger for his review prior to the Planning Commission
Meeting on November 13, 1984.
Your letter dated October 24, 1984 made little mention of
the changes we have made in the plans for this project.
At the neighborhood meeting last week, we showed the follow-
ing improvements:
a. a reduction in the total unit density
b. a shift in density from south to north
c. a revised road system within the site to
direct traffic away from Cardinal Creek
neighborhood.
We also recognize that Interestate 494 is a major factor in
the development of this site and have oriented the buildings
accordingly.
tbl
5290 villa vicly • ediza, ran:),54.1 26 • 925-1020
;Lvman 0
:ton.!r 31, 1984
p.lje 2
Unfortunately, you have mis -represented our position regarding
the connection of Cardinal Creek Road through your neighborhocd.
We feel that this connection is not required for our project
because so few trips are directed south. However, the traffic
study indicates that this connection would redirect some of
the traffic from Cardinal Creek III through our project to
Baker Road and at full development, would actually reduce
overall traffic through your neighborhood. We are comfortable
with either alternative and encourage you to have your own
traffic study done to confirm these projections.
Sincerely,
CHIMO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
619.°
Gregory S. Kellenberger
Director of Research and Development
GSK:meb
cc: Mayor Wolf Penzel
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
William Bearman, Chairman of Planning Commission
Hakon Torsesen, Commissioner
Virginia Gartner, Commissioner
Robert Hallett, Commissioner
Stan Johannes, Commissioner
Dennis Marhula, Commissioner
Ed Schuck, Commissioner
• lot
October 24, 1984
CARDINAL CREEK HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
C/o 6997 Edgebrook Place
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Mr. Mark Z. Jones, II
CHIMO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
5290 Villa Way
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Re: The proposed Cardinal Creek Village
Dear Mr. Jones:
I was quite surprised that the meeting you held last.night showed our
neighborhood few substantial changes in your plans as to the above mentioned
project and no change in overall density, there being 328 units under the
new proposal.
The project that you are proposing is entirely too dense and is not
transitional at all in that it proceeds from existing expensive family homes
directly to RM 2.5 structures, the most dense zoning that is available under
Eden Prairie's Ordinance.
I believe that the opinion of the homeowner's in Cardinal Creek is that
the development shown should consist of: first, a band of single family dwellings
on the south and west: then RN 6.5 on the remainder of the property. I also
believe that the entire neighborhood is very much concerned as to the proposals
made as to the extremely small size of the majority of the apartments which
are to be rented very cheaply---beginning at $450.00 monthly as stated in your
P.U.D. Report.
It also is clear that you realize that the highway 494's noise will be
a problem in a 3 1/2 story apartment project on the second and third floors--
much more so than your than your E.A.W. would indicate, and even that showed
a violation of the P.C.A. Standards.
I would appreciate it if you would provide me with the "Study" which Was
used by you in your Traffic Study as Mr. Hoisington has agreed to furnish
within the week.
Also, Mr. Greg Gustafson has agreed to furnish us with the deed book and
page number of the old easement to Baker Road and I would appreciate it if this
would be also furnished to us within the week.
Mr. Mark Z. Jones, two October 24, 1984
I appreciate the fact that you have agreed with the homeowners of
Cardinal Creek that it is not at all essential to connect the proposed
project with the existing Cardinal Creek Road and that in fact the connection
would needlessly generate traffic which would be dangerous to the neighborhood
children at play.
Thanking you for your consideration in this matter, / am
Yours truly,
Floyd E. Siefferman, Jr.
FESjr:o'd
cc: Mayor Wolf Penzel
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
William Dearman, Chairman of Planning Commission
Hakon Torjesen, Commissioner
Virginia Gartner, Commissioner
Robert Hallett, Commissioner
Stan Johannes, Commissioner
Dennis Marhula, Commissioner
Ed Schuck, Commissioner
110
Sincv.ely;
HESO 10 Dr-irle, Minnesota
Department of Transportation
4 tc- District 5
4) 2055 No. Lilac Drive
••••11 i•••" C,
OF 10 Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422.
(612) 545•3761
October 4, 1984
Mr. Chris Luger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
8950 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer To: 315
S.P. 2785 T.H. 494
Plat review of Cardinal Creek Village located
W. of T.H. 494 and S. of CSAH 62 in part of
Section 3, T. 116, R. 22 in City of Eden Prairie
Hennepin County
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat fo
r
o
u
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats
a
n
d
S
u
r
v
e
y
s
.
W
e
f
i
n
d
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
acceptable for further development and do not ant
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
a
n
y
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
i
m
p
a
c
e
o
n
our existing system.
The developer and the city should be aware that r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
a
very noise sensitive land use. Present noise lev
e
l
s
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
e
x
c
e
e
d
S
t
a
t
e
standards. Mn/DOT will not provide any type of n
o
i
s
e
a
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
-
opment adjacent to the existing highway. Every e
f
f
o
r
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
a
d
e
i
n
t
h
e
design of the development to lessen any impact th
i
s
m
i
g
h
t
h
a
v
e
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
development.
If you have any questions in regard to this revi
e
w
p
l
e
a
s
e
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
E
v
a
n
G
r
e
e
n
a
t
545-3761, ext. 119. Thank you for your cooperati
o
n
i
n
t
h
i
s
m
a
t
t
e
r
.
cc: Sandra Cardcbring
Metropolitan Council
Mike Rieter
Hennepin County Surveyor's Office
AnEqualOpporrunayEmployer
..x
(:)September 3, 1984
To: Eden Prairie Planning Commission
From: Cardinal Creak Residents Association
Subject: Cardinal Creek Village Development
The residents of Cardinal Creek are opposed to the proposed
development of a multiple family project to be known as Cardi
n
a
l
Creek Village.
1. Safety hazards would result from 350 to 700 additional autos
using Cardinal Creek Road.
A. There are many small children in the existing neighborhood.
The safety of these children would definitely be jeopardize
d
with an increase in traffic which could approach five to si
x
times existing traffic levels.
B. The intersection of Cardinal Creek Road and Edgebrook Place
is a blind curve on a hill. Any additional traffic would
aggrevate an existing hazard.
2. Very definite adverse effects would result from this prop
o
s
e
d
development on the now existing neighborhoods.
A. Homeowners in Cardinal Creek selected this area due to the
quite secluded setting that offered dead end streets and
natural wildlife areas. A large multiple dwelling area and
through street into the proposed area would greatly
reduce the value of this existing setting to present resident
s
and to the city trying to encourage such developments in the
future.
B. Many existing homes have panoramic views of the proposed area
.
Any development should be consistent with the existing open
natural setting. This will not happen with a multi-family
high density development now proposed.
C. Cardinal Creek was recently selected to be among the "Top Te
n
"
residential areas in the Twin Cities by Minneapolis St. Paul
Magazine. This fact is of benefit to Eden Prairie as a whol
e
.
Any future development should fit into the general scheme of
the neighborhood. This development is not the case.
3. The community as a whole would be adversely affected speci
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
relating to:
A. Access to Baker Road f:rom Cardinal Creek Road would be grea
t
l
y
congested.
B. Forest Hills School is already a large school filled to capa
c
i
t
y
,
C. Eden Prairie's reputation as a desirable community to live
i
n
would suffer greatly.
We opposed any development with density greater than that of
S
t
o
n
e
w
o
o
,
Court based on usable building sites, and we oppose any deve
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
that would use Cardinal Creek Road.
09-
Resident Name
-T: 114.
G I-050+L
OJ2 . Lt.q EX,
Lft PALk)o42/./
G. .p. tkLJ
Aer
.1. I-C1( /1 -7J-Di Uzfis" cx.)chrb
t‘
C- L-Cl ,41-,11 „7,„
687e Et-e16e,t.,,c P(.
13175 gt..te ci- Akici
en CaNk et c K -avA4,-
CotediNt4(0,:tt 49,(1
b2b8 4:d
on eAte,
S 1-7
6E3 NU.T
./
Address Signature
Page 2
In conclusion we oppose the general concept of a multi-family
development using Cardinal Creek Road as a primary or secondary
access. We strongly encourage the planning commission to only
approve a proposal which utilizes only access from Baker Road.
It should be mandatory that this road he completed prior to any
start of development construction. We also encourage the plan-
ning commission to require any development to have a neighbor-
hood setting consistant with the existing setting.
/
()0 .2 ) A i/
tt.t.
/77 \ PO N.A7)-(-'L (:( ‘71-7: I
4,/:(
K,s
<C, 01.)ktel-1
c),Th•ar-
m L 5111'71-f A:9 1 ;1_,
S ." ( S etmt , -?f t( ,4- Lik
d
4 . La. Err9
Ple_
s L./1141--nia, et yfi-±- •
/0( ci
6)9i1/
S
J--7/
/32/4 C4t4.,..evi,C4/k 1.11
I NA,1A /
/2 a
Da ol )•2
Vgt.t1 Kai"
(26
(Lei- 1J& CO nr r,c1
\5'/A 11 ttitiAA n't //id e/..'
/c I di, (5W ge/i-,...-,('/Je
71 .5/11 y A v'rsite . /3/5•1, atrii in I Ctziel - ecIL
j e‘vo„ L\ a. toct 4,0)i 01; Ocie 4tkikt
. vh •
e .,,ADy IAAA :3"..-1/3(4
if ej
%-1.7-1-11
1a:-t,te262 474,0
11-7 . • 4/e 1/3.t eleit fr./
! A
) .-)a0C, 04)-er,
6 9f 0 ‹Cii
,/ ,1 •
S." 44 ti 42, 4- n 115-30
(i.314
kcjer 4z,„,
12.1 .
i.. %g_3
6551 E:p6E-Fvt.,4 "Pt -.
V t;: e cy',.:Crov--,:1! ......P.Ace.
.-1,1,,,L. S;ilt ,1,,,,,— 0117 iv:.fr...).. A_ II' itj— 4 ‘s'ii)L-111P ' .
Resident Name
iatt)t,1
Address
cotv s.04,6
ez)
fft/)')7d Eldig ,ICi. . 6€64M11
1 eaziencLed ,cly Setnrrico (1,13O2_ .Vancl k:abe Rd • (ca. ZilLtnect;
ale- 1. Mice- Cioti i- 680a 56fAci 4e._ a a.42_ @1^4 ii.
5;retteft5 rvo PAIYE At Deesch.. t 321 YCQ4 Crzeiat.lfae.
ii.grW/ helA) Illt) 6,J,:v4 C.-rate, 4 ,
tgaribal'4"4Jrli 4N .e) 4364 daligdg-'. 11 ,4'
,e),,,4“: n / fr24 4—S,9-."- 1 33 ? '' ea,446,-(
Prcr"ti
Redeg 10; ALi itT1--
gt1/1 14vs tete.
•
5571 C-Ag- /11(-4-
/359?) Oed /4./." 61.
. • . • : vo vra .:m ..11.0,.*:irn!73.9. A'SIVI'", V!"."1` *47 •
. .
ac, BE)nrsAlC._ CLIVLOOrs )
Sabt 164 11C{12ACSM
fAAil ..6.12A-1". CP-Jj.1,4-t•-n/1.
Stor n et,loodi dityvt.t a,14.,
&PS .Stiitetocto4 apoildlig -,
6t,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Bob litmbert, Director of Community Services fAv
December 13, 1984
. Community Services Staff Supplementary Report to December 7, 1984
Planning Staff Report Regarding Cardinal Creek Village PUD Concept Request
Cardinal Creek Village is a 40.7 acre site immediately west of Highway 494, east of
Baker Road, and north of the existing Cardinal Creek subdivisions.
The existing request is for a PUD Concept stage approval for 280 units on 40.7 acres
of land at a gross density of 6.88 units per acre.
The issues relating to parks, recreation and natural resources are the grading, the
treatment of the creek valley, pedestrian pathways, and recreation facilities proposed.
The proponent is proposing to construct a variety of multi-family housing types from
duplexes abutting the creek floodplain area to several three story apartment buildings
and townhouses.
The majority of the site is a hilly, open space area.with very little vegetation but
with significant changes in elevation. The existing grading plan would require a number
Of 25' cuts, which is an improvement over the original plan that proposed 40' cuts.
The site plan does not propose to intrude, in the floodplain and will conform to the
Shoreland Management Ordinance.
The existing 5' concrete walkway on the south and east side of Cardinal Creek Road
should be extended through to Baker Road. The Community Services staff would also
recommend sidewalk connections from Cardinal Creek Road to all of the larger apartment
buildings, and would recommend that the Council consider requiring an 8' asphlat bike-
way on the west side of Cardinal Creek Road from Baker Road, south to the southern
boundary of this site. This would provide bikeway and pedestrian off-road trails along
Cardinal Creek Road where the majority of the heavy traffic will be. It also provides
a bikeway connection from the asphalt trail connection to the floodplain, north to
Baler Road, along the side of the road that will provide a totlot, as well as a park
shelter and adult recreation area. The City should monitor pedestrian traffic in this
area in the future to determine if this 8' asphalt bikeway should be extended south
and westerly along the north side of Cardinal Creek Road, back to Baker Road.
The PUD Concept Plan for Cardinal Creek Village depicts a sundeck and swimming pool
that would be centrally located and a totlot area and park shelter within a recreation
open space area adjacent to the Nine-Mile Creek Floodplain. The Community Services
staff believe that these proposed recreation facilities, along with the pedestrian
systems that extend to Forest Hills School Park should provide adequate recreation
facilities for this development.
The Planning Commission approved this nun Concept on December 10, 1984 with the range
of density from 208 units to 280 units. The final approval on density will be based
on more specific plans that will be provided with the rezoning request. The Community
Services staff would recianmend approval as per the December 7 Planning Staff Report
with the additional comments mentioned in this report and according to the Planning
Commission approval with a range of rezoning density from 208 to 280 units based on
further detailed plans that will be prov0pd at the time of rezoning request.
II I
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
11710-UGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: December 7, 1984
PROJECT: Cardinal Creek Village
APPLICANT/
FEETWNER: Chimo Development Corporation
REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept stage approval for 350
multiple family units on 40.7 acres.
2. Review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
Background
This is a continued item from the
September 10, and November 13, 1984,
Planning Commission meetings. At
those meetings, a number of issues
were identified by Staff, the
Planning Commission, and the neigh-
borhood, which included density,
transition, grading, architecture,
access, traffic, and neighborhood
connections.
Revised Site Plan/Density
The proponents have submitted a
revised site plan for 280 units on
40.7 acres of land at a gross
density of 6.88 units per acre.
This compares with the original site
plan at 350 units at a gross density
of 8.6 units per acre. The density
of the revised site plan, based on
28 acres of developable land, is ten
units per acre. The original site
plan had a net density of 12.57
units per acre. The gross density
of 6.8 units per acre compares with
density allowed under RM-6.5 zoning,
of 6.7 units per acre.
The reduction in units from 350 to
a
Cardinal Creek Village 2 December 7, 1984
280 includes some reduction in the high density and medium density housing are
a
s
.
The area south of new Cardinal Creek Road, adjacent to existing Cardinal Creek,
w
a
s
originally envisioned for 64 townhome units at a net density of 9.2 units per a
c
r
e
.
The revised site plan now indicates 24 duplex units at a net density of 4.3 dwel
l
i
n
g
units per acre. The land area, north of Cardinal Creek Road, was originally pla
n
n
e
d
for 286 high density units at an overall density of approximately 18 units per a
c
r
e
.
The revised site plan has a mixture of medium and high density multiple fa
m
i
l
y
units, totalling 256 units at a net density of 12.43 units per acre. The densit
y
i
n
this area, ranges from 5.8 to 17.9 units per acre. The areas planned at densi
t
i
e
s
of 17.5 and 17.9 du/acre are above the Code maximum for RM-2.5 zoning at 17.4 u
n
i
t
s
per acre.
Transition
The revised site plan indicates a reduction of 40 units in areas adjacen
t
t
o
existing Cardinal Creek, and allows for more open space in consolidated areas
.
T
h
e
duplex units are also smaller architecturally than the six-unit attached buil
d
i
n
g
s
originally proposed.
Grading
The Staff Report of September 7, 1984, indicated that there was a considera
b
l
e
amount of cut in the central portion of the site. The cut was necessary
t
o
accommodate the proponent's original plan. At that time, Staff thought tha
t
a
different plan, which did not require as much level land area, might better util
i
z
e
this portion of the site, and reduction in the overall density would allow for m
o
r
e
of the existing site features to be retained.
The grading plan has been modified to provide for two building areas; an upper an
d
a
lower area. The lower area would have access off new Cardinal Creek Road, and
t
h
e
upper level would have access off a road which will eventually connect to
t
h
e
property to the north. The two-tiered arrangement of buildings on-site allows
f
o
r
less grading to occur. In general, the amount of cut has been reduced
t
o
approximately 25 feet on the average as opposed to approximately 40 feet under
t
h
e
original submittal.
Architecture
Three distinct building types, with varying architectural mass, are shown and
a
r
e
proposed to be architecturally integrated by the use of common building mater
i
a
l
s
such as wood, stucco, and brick. The architecture for the multiple family u
n
i
t
s
remains the Some and will be primarily three-story buildings, with double loaded
corridors, underground parking, and elevators. The other building type will
b
e
a
duplex unit.
The architectural sketches submitted depict steep rooflines, varied roof height
s
a
n
d
staggered facades. The use of the duplex units, adjacent to existing housin
g
i
n
Cardinal Creek to the south of the project, could help provide an architect
u
r
a
l
transition. Buildings to the north of the new Cardinal Creek Road still a
p
p
e
a
r
massive. The plan indicates more open space and grade separation than the original
plan, which helps break up building mass. Heavy landscaping, including substantial
berming and mass plantings of large trees may help break up the view of bui
l
d
i
n
g
mass as well.
Cardinal Creek Village 3 December 7, 1984
Access
The revised concept plan proposes the construction of new Cardinal Creek Road from
Baker Road to Cardinal Creek Road in the southeast corner of the site. The road is
proposed to be constructed with 60 feet of right-of-way with a 32-foot road surface.
A bikeway and sidewalk will be constructed along either side of the road. The
access road to the north, which will provide an ultimate connection point to
adjacent property, has been changed. Rather than running the entire length of the
powerline easement and connecting into new Cardinal Creek Road near proposed
building site three, the road connection to the north occurs just to the west of
proposed Phase I. This allows for less roadway to be constructed and less grading
work to occur.
The proposed road extension to the north property line is at 7.5 per cent. City
Code would allow a maximum street grade of 8.0 per cent.
The proponent is in the process of negotiating a 100 per cent petition for local
improvements. If the petition cannot be obtained, the proponent may request the
City to acquire right-of-way by condemnation.
Traffic
The construction of new Cardinal Creek Road is necessary to accommodate the amount
of new traffic expected to be generated, and to provide for appropriate emergency
vehicle access by the connection to existing Cardinal Creek Road. Construction of
the proposed residential street to the north may only be necessary to provide
additional access to the parking areas for Phase I. The balance of the road could
be completed concurrent with Phase V. Since the proponent's phasing plan envisions
the construction of Phase I in the central portion of the project, perhaps new
Cardinal Creek Road may need to be extended to serve the first site at this time
with construction of the remainder of new Cardinal Creek Road within a two-year time
period.
The initial traffic study provided by the proponent indicated that for a project of
350 units, 2,080 vehicle trips would be generated daily. The study represented
approximately two-thirds of the traffic north-bound on Baker Road to 1-494. The
remainder of the traffic would be attracted in a southerly direction towards Valley
View Road.
Baker Road is classified as a minor arterial by the City. It currently carries
3,000 vehicles per day and it is projected to carry a volume of 7,000 trips per day
in the year 2000. The current capacity of Baker Road is 7,500 to 10,000 trips per
day, and is scheduled for upgrading into four lanes in 1987. The upgrading of Baker
Road will include some realignment allowing for a design speed of 40 miles per hour
and an ultimate capacity of 17,500 vehicle trips per day.
The proponents have submitted an updated traffic study for Cardinal Creek Village,
dated December 4, 1984, from Benshoof and Associates. The attached memorandum
indicates that, based upon 200 units, there would be 1,800 vehicle trips per day. A
traffic study was conducted at the intersection of Baker Road and existing Cardinal
Creek Road at the p.m. peak to determine the direction of trips. 52 per cent of all
trips use Baker Road to and from the north, while 48 per cent travel Baker Road to
and from the south. The report indicates that with the completion of Highway #62,
the amount of traffic going north would increase by about thirteen per cent, which
xo
Cardinal Creek Village 4 December 7, 1984
would be consistent with the 65/35 per cent directional distribution presented in
the original report and the updated report of November 8, 1984.
The study also indicates travel times and distances from this site following a route
from Cardinal Creek Road, south on Baker, to Valley View Road, to Plaza Drive, Trunk
Highway #5, to 1-494 east-bound, and a return route exactly the opposite. A second
route was also studied, proceeding north-bound on Baker Road from a location of the
proposed northerly access of new Cardinal Creek Road, to County Road #67, to 1-494
south-bound, to the same point on 1-494 as the first route. The return segment was
the exact opposite of this route. The study indicates that the first route was
approximately two-tenths of a mile longer and required approximately 2-1/2 minutes
longer to travel than the northerly route. Their conclusions are that the northerly
route along Baker Road, to County Road #67, to 1-494, would be the preferred route.
The study also talks about volumes on existing Cardinal Creek Road. Current vehicle
projections were for 710 trips per day. With the looping of new Cardinal Creek
Road, the amount of vehicles generated on existing Cardinal Creek Road, would be 645
vehicles per day with a 65/35 per cent directional distribution, and 705 vehicles
per day with a 55/45 per cent directional distribution.
Staff has received a letter from the Cardinal Creek Home Owners Association in
response to the proponent's traffic study. The letter has been given to the
proponents, and they were asked for a response to be prepared for the Planning
.Commission meeting.
Neighborhood Connections
New Cardinal Creek Road is proposed to be connected to existing Cardinal Creek Road,
in the southeast corner of the site. Since residents have expressed a concern about
an increase in traffic, one alternative would be to create a stop condition at a "T"
intersection to discourage through traffic.
Conclusions
One of the drawbacks of the Planned Unit Development Concept stage review is that
there are some proposals which require significantly more detail to justify higher
densities on a site specific basis. Aside from the issue of traffic, the issue of
density on this project centers around the sensitivity to the site, and the
massiveness of the buildings. Since the total possible density range on this
property varies so widely, depending upon the degree of density transfer, if any,
and the interpretation of the graphic depiction of the Comprehensive Guide Plan,
Staff does not believe it is possible to justify either an increase, or a decrease,
in density without a complete evaluation of the impact of particular plan on site.
A liberal way of interpreting the Comprehensive Guide Plan would be to attribute ten
units per acre maximum allowed in the Medium Density Residential areas on the
Comprehensive Guide Plan over the entire 40-acre parcel to reach a total unit count
of 400. The proponent originally applied to 350 units and the Planning Commission
indicated that it was not an acceptable number of units on the site. The proponent
has changed the site plan and reduced the total number of units to 280, which would
correspond to 28 acres at ten units per acre. This would be consistent with the
top end of the range of the Comprehensive Guide Plan taking a liberal interpretation
of the development area in allowing no density transfer credit. 280 units would
also approximately correspond to zoning the entire 40-acre piece to the RM-6.5
designation.
iA1
Cardinal Creek Village 5 December 7, 1984
Some members of the Planning Commission expressed concern that densities in the
immediate neighborhood did not exceed 6.5 units per acre on a gross, or net, basis.
St. John's Woods is the example developed at approximately 6.5 units per acre
gross/net density. However, it is important to bear in mind that the Comprehensive
Guide Plan does specifically designate this area as Medium Density Residential,
which would allow a maximum density of ten units per acre on a net basis.
A conservative way of applying the Comprehensive Guide Plan designation to this site
would be to limit the zoning district, if possible, at the high end of the RM-6.5
district. Using 31 as a base figure for developable acreage outside of the flood
plain area, a total of 208 units would be possible using the RM-6.5 Zoning District.
Since, at this point, the developer is not at a stage to be more specific about the
final architectural form of the project, and since there may be significant concern
about allowing densities higher than the RM-6.5 District without these specifics,
one additional alternative available to the Planning Commission would be to
entertain the idea of approving a range of units perhaps from 208 to 280, with the
bottom end of the range being the base and any parcels coming back in for specific
zoning approval in the RM-2.5 category having to meet specific performance criteria
such as:
1. Site plan must show sensitivity to existing land forms and vegetation.
2. There should be heavy use of landscaping to decrease the scale of the
buildings.
3. The primary building material of the building should be brick, and the
building should be residential in character with pitched roof.
4. The mass of the apartment buildings should be reduced by either reducing the
size of individual buildings, or provide a very specific architectural
treatment to decrease the mass, or a combination of a number of similar
factors.
In other words, the Planning Commission may wish to entertain a range such that they
are comfortable with the low end of the range without more specifics and would
require much more specific information which would be reviewed on a merit basis in
order for the developer to justify higher densities on individual parcels.
SUMMARY
The Planning Commission may choose to recommend any of the following alternative
courses of action:
1. The Planning Commission may choose to recommend approval of the request for
Planned Unit Development Concept for 280 units on 40.7 acres of land based
upon plans dated November 8, 1984, revised November 28, 1984, subject to the
Staff Reports, dated December 7, 1984, and September 7, 1984.
2. The Planning Commission may choose to recommend that the development plans
be returned to the proponent if the Commission feels that the issues of
density, transition, and traffic had not been satisfactorily addressed and
would require additional information.
Cardinal Creek Village 6 December 7, 1984
3. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the request for Planned
Unit Development Concept based upon impacts including density, transition,
grading, access, and traffic.
123
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner'
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
September 7, 1984
Cardinal Creek Village
Chimo Development Corporation
1. Planned Unit Development Concept stage approval for 350
multiple family on 40.7 acres.
2. Review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
.TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
The Comprehensive Guide Plan ident-
ifies Medium Density Residential (up
to ten units per acre) and Public
Open Space land uses for this site.
The Guide Plan depicts surrounding
future land uses as predominantly
Residential Medium to the north and
west of the site, 1-494 to the east,
and Low Density single family
housing to the south, which consists
of the Cardinal Creek I and II. The
site is currently zoned Rural.
Existing Site Characteristics
The site slopes in a north-south
direction, with an elevation change
of approximately 130 feet from a
high point of elevation 996 in the
northeast corner of the site, to
elevation 860 adjacent to Nine-Mile
Creek. The southern portion of the
site is relatively level, indicative
of a low-land and flood plain area
adjacent to Nine-Mile Creek. The
upper and central portions of the
site are quite steep. The natural
lay of the land suggests three
possible building areas: one at the
top of the hill, one central side
ta,L1
Cardinal Creek Village 2 September 7, 1984
hill site, and a lower level site adjacent to the Nine-Mile Creek.
Soil conditions vary considerably. The upper, level areas of the site consist
primarily of sand and clay, containing fine gravel with some small boulders, which
is considered excellent for building and road construction. There are other areas
of the site near Nine-Mile Creek consisting of peat, muck, and organic material,
which will be excavated and replaced with fill material borrowed from higher
elevations.
The dominant vegetative type is grass land. There are pockets of deciduous trees
and shrubs, which consist of either dense upland oak species along the northeastern
and northwestern boundaries, or as wooded swamp areas in the southeastern corner of
the site, which include primarily willow and cottonwood species.
The cattail marsh in the southeast corner of the site is classified as a shallow
fresh marsh, and any alterations would require specific approval from the Department
of Natural Resources. No such alteration is proposed. The area along Nine-Mile
Creek and the adjacent wetland area are designated as flood plain areas. The
elevation of the flood plain ranges from 861-868.
Nine Mile Creek is classified as a general development water, and provisions of the
Shoreland Management Ordinance and the Flood Plain Ordinance will apply, which
include development guidelines for building elevations to be two feet above the
hundred-year flood elevation, a 150-foot setback from the ordinary high-water mark
of Nine-Mile Creek, a minimum lot size of 10,000 sq. ft., and a maximum allowable
impervious surface of 30%.
There is a variety of wildlife inhabitting the site, consisting primarily of
pheasants, squirrels, rabbits, and various songbirds. There is some transitory use
by several deer that utilize the wooded areas along the northern border of the site
and the outside edge of 1-494 right-of-way as a deer run. The deer run will be left
as open space as part of the overall development plan.
Since the project involves more than 150 attached units, an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet is required per the Minnesota Statutes.
Land Use Proposal
The concept plan involves the construction of 350 multiple family units on 40.7
acres of land at an overall gross density of 8.6 units per acre. The net density of
the project, based on 28.2 acres of developable land (including 4.5 acres street
right-of-way) is 12.4 units per acre. The site plan concept indicates five building
areas on sites, with different densities ranging from 9.8 to 18.6 units per acre.
The site plan concept illustrates a density transition, with lower density areas and
open space surrounding the site perimeter, and with the highest density areas
located in the central portion of the site (1-A, 1-B, and 1-C, on the plan).
The concept plan works well within the existing site development constraints.
Buildings seem to be in the most appropriate locations, while protecting open space
areas along Nine-Mile Creek, steep slope areas, and wooded areas on the site.
Mass Grading
A general way of describing the mass grading plan is that the higher areas of the
las
Cardinal Creek
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
3 September 7, 1
9
8
4
site will be c
u
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
a
n
d
4
0
f
e
e
t
t
o
f
i
l
l
l
o
w
a
r
e
a
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
N
i
n
e
-
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
.
The steep slop
e
a
r
e
a
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
o
c
c
u
r
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
1
-
4
9
4
within Northe
r
n
S
t
a
t
e
s
P
o
w
e
r
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
,
f
o
r
m
a
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
b
u
f
f
e
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
highway. Gradi
n
g
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
a
r
e
s
h
a
p
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
b
e
r
m
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
a
future road. T
h
e
c
u
t
a
r
e
a
i
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
20 feet. This
i
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
t
h
e
housing units
.
T
h
e
s
t
e
e
p
s
l
o
p
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
b
o
r
d
e
r
o
f
t
h
i
s
c
u
t
a
r
e
a
will be retain
e
d
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
s
o
m
e
w
h
a
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
i
s
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
area and the h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
t
o
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
.
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
will result in
u
p
t
o
4
0
f
e
e
t
o
f
c
u
t
o
f
f
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
,
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
t
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
956. In gener
a
l
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
g
r
a
d
e
s
w
i
l
l
v
a
r
y
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
9
0
0
a
n
d
9
1
0
.
S
t
a
f
f
f
e
e
l
s
the amount of
c
u
t
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
i
s
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
p
e
r
h
a
p
s
a
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
plan, which do
e
s
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
s
m
u
c
h
l
e
v
e
l
l
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
,
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
t
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
i
s
portion of the
s
i
t
e
,
o
r
p
e
r
h
a
p
s
a
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
m
o
r
e
of the existin
g
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
b
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
m
a
y
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
housing densit
y
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
i
s
1
8
.
6
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Mass grading i
n
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
w
i
l
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
u
b
-
g
r
a
d
e
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
fill between f
i
v
e
a
n
d
t
e
n
f
e
e
t
.
Site Access
The concept pl
a
n
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
s
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
R
o
a
d
f
r
o
m
B
a
k
e
r
R
o
a
d
t
o
Cardinal Creek
R
o
a
d
i
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
r
o
a
d
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
b
e
constructed wi
t
h
6
0
f
e
e
t
o
f
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
a
n
d
a
3
2
-
f
o
o
t
r
o
a
d
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
.
A
b
i
k
e
w
a
y
a
n
d
sidewalk will
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
.
A
n
o
t
h
e
r
r
o
a
d
i
s
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
along the nor
t
h
e
a
s
t
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
w
o
u
l
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
property to th
e
n
o
r
t
h
.
T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
t
y
p
i
c
a
l
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
r
o
a
d
w
i
t
h
a
2
8
-
foot road surfa
c
e
.
The roadways a
p
p
e
a
r
t
o
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
,
f
r
o
m
a
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
t
a
n
d
p
o
i
n
t
,
i
n
t
h
e
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
the site requi
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
e
a
s
t
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
w
o
r
k
.
T
h
e
r
o
a
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
e
x
t
e
n
d
t
o
the north prop
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
w
i
l
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
b
l
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
g
r
a
d
e
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
will be at a 7
.
5
%
r
o
a
d
g
r
a
d
e
.
The extention
o
f
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
R
o
a
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
n
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
o
f
t
h
i
s
s
i
t
e
t
o
B
a
k
e
r
Road appears t
o
b
e
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
would be cent
e
r
e
d
o
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
d
b
y
O
s
c
a
r
M
i
l
l
e
r
a
n
d
H
a
r
o
l
d
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
properties are
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
l
e
v
e
l
,
a
n
d
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
R
o
a
d
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
f
a
r
t
h
e
r
t
o
the north, or
t
o
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
.
T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
s
o
m
e
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
l
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
s
t
e
e
p
slopes on the
n
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
h
a
l
f
o
f
t
h
e
G
r
i
f
f
i
t
h
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
s
h
o
r
e
l
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
adjacent to Ni
n
e
-
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
h
a
l
f
o
f
t
h
e
O
s
c
a
r
M
i
l
l
e
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Locating the
r
o
a
d
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
o
r
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
a
c
c
e
s
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
result in incr
e
a
s
e
d
r
o
a
d
l
e
n
g
t
h
a
n
d
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
s
t
.
The proponent
i
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
n
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
i
n
g
a
1
0
0
%
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
l
o
c
a
l
improvements.
I
f
t
h
e
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
c
a
n
n
o
t
b
e
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
,
i
t
m
a
y
b
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
to acquire a n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
b
y
e
m
m
i
n
e
n
t
d
o
m
a
i
n
.
Traffic Impacts
The construct
i
o
n
o
f
C
a
r
d
i
n
a
l
C
r
e
e
k
R
o
a
d
i
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
anticipated a
n
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
b
y
- on.H. The cons
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
Cardinal Creek Village 4 September 7, 1984
may only be necessary to provide additional access to the parking areas for Phase I.
The balance of..that road could be completed concurrent with Phase V.
The traffic analysis provided by the proponent indicates that, for a project of this
size, 2,080 vehicle trips per day would be generated. Approximately two-thirds of
the traffic would be attracted northbound on Baker Road to County Road #67 to
utilize access to north and southbound 1-494. The remaining one-third of the
traffic would be attracted in the southerly direction towards Valley View Road.
Baker Road is classified as a minor arterial by the City. It currently carries
3,000 vehicle trips per day and is projected to carry a volume of 7,000 Average
Daily Trips in the year 2000. Baker Road currently has the capacity of 7,500 to
10,000 vehicle trips per day and is scheduled for upgrading to four lanes in 1986.
The upgrading of Baker Road will include some realignment allowing for a design
speed of 40 miles per hour and a capacity of 17,500 vehicle trips per day.
The intersection of Cardinal Creek Road and Baker Road will require improvements
necessary to accommodate three maneuvering lanes for right and left turn outbound
movements, plus one inbound lane.
Utilities
Sewer and water service can be provided to this site by connection to an existing
' water line in Baker Road and connection to a sewer line in existing Cardinal Creek
Road to the south of the project. The water main system will be looped for water
protection.
Storm water run-off will sheet drain overland across parking areas and the existing
road system into a series of catch basins and storm sewer pipes, which will outlet
into Nine-Mile Creek. It appears that the storm water run-off will be following the
natural slope of the land from the high points in the northern portion of the site
to the low areas in the south-central portion of the site.
Architecture
Three distinct building types, with varying architectural mass, are proposed and
will be architecturally integrated by the use of common building materials such as
wood, stucco, and brick. The architectural images indicate views of various housing
areas in different portions of the site.
Building Type I, in the center portion of the project, will be three stories in
height, with double loaded corridors, underground parking, and elevators. Building
Type II will be a walk-up unit proposed in part of Phase I and Phase V, with
attached garages and single loaded corridors. Building Type III in Phase II and IV,
is both one and two stories in height and has both attached and detached garages.
The architectural images suggest a strong residential character with steep roof
lines, varied roof height, and staggered facades. Staff believes that the one and
two-story units in Phase II provide transition to the low density single family
housing in Cardinal Creek to the south of Nine-Mile Creek. Buildings in Phase I,
when viewed from adjacent property to the south and west of this site, will appear
to be massive. Although the buildings in plan view appear to be separated by
considerable open space and grade separation, from a distance the buildings will
appear as a long and continual mass. This may mean a different arrangement of units
I 11
Cardinal Creek Village 5 September 7, 1984
within Phase I or a lowering of the density, or a combination thereof. Heavy
landscaping, which includes berming and mass plantings of large trees, may help
break up this view of building mass. Additional space separation between the units
may help, as well. This may mean a different arrangement of units within Phase I,
or a lowering of the density, or a combination of these options.
Parking
A total of 735 parking spaces are provided on-site at a ratio of 2.23 parking stalls
per unit. This includes 183 underground spaces, 201 on-grade garage spaces, and 351
on-grade surface parking spaces. Of the 203 on-grade garage spaces provided, only
23 are detached garages. The use of underground parking and detached garages allows
for more land area to be used as part of common open space.
Common Open Space
As part of the overall development plan, there will be considerable common areas,
Including outdoor play areas for small children, an outdoor pool, sundeck, and
walkways. The common areas and facilities associated with the apartment and
condominium components will be owned and maintained by the Chimo/Mark Management and
the Homeowner's Association respectively. The flood plain area will be platted as
an outlot and dedicated to the City as permanent open space. Open space corridor
along the highway right-of-way will be maintained as part of the apartment complex.
Any internal pedestrian systems, planned as part of individual cluster areas within
the project, should provide appropriate connections to sidewalks and bikeways
planned along Cardinal Creek Road. There should also be a connection to any trail
system provided along Nine-Mile Creek. This trail location and type of trail would
be subject to review by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission.
Conclusions
Approval of any Planned Unit Development should be based upon how well the proposal
meets the criteria of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance, which include:
1. Providing a better development than would be possible under the
strict interpretation and application of other zoning regulations.
2. Providing a variety of housing types and environments.
3. Efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled open
space through distribution of population density and intensity of
land use where desirable and feasible.
Other criteria should include:
1. Adequacy of the existing transportation system to handle the
increased traffic and, if not, a solution for upgrading of the
roads.
2. Provision for sewer and water service and drainage of the site to an
appropriate outlet without creating erosion, or flooding up, or
down, stream. •
117
Cardinal Creek Village 6 September 7, 1984
3. Consistency with the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan
4. Preservation of natural features through arrangement of land uses
and roadways and common open space':
Staff feels that the Planned Unit Development Concept is consistent with the
objectives of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. It appears that the concept
plan proposes to develop the site in such a manner that existing natural features
can be preserved. Three buildable areas are possible on site with minimal
disruption of the natural features, with the exception of the central portion of the
site where up to 40 feet of cut is proposed. Within this area, either a different
density, different arrangement of uses, or an alternative building type may be
appropriate, which would require less grading. One approach would be to terrace
this area with an upper site at a similar grade to the north residential road and
two or three sites at a similar elevation to Cardinal Creek Road. (See Attachment
A) Using a cluster approach with grade changes can provide more open space between
the buildings and reduce overall building mass. An appropriate transition between
adjacent land uses is provided through the planning of lower density, one and two-
story units, and open space adjacent to lower density land uses adjacent to the
site. Higher density areas are concentrated in the central portion of the site at a
considerable distance from adjoining property.
Roadways appear to planned in the most logical location from a topographic
standpoint. It will be necessary to construct Cardinal Creek Road from Baker Road
to this site, which will require the cooperation of adjacent land owners. The
location of this connection appears to be an appropriate location centered on the
property line between the Griffiths and Miller properties. The intersection at
Baker Road appears to be in an appropriate location, approximately 200 feet south of
the driveway entrance to the Crosstown Baptist Church. Sight distances in both
directions should be adequate.
Baker Road has the capacity to handle the additional amount of traffic in its
current configuration, since it is designated as a minor arterial with a capacity of
up to 10,000 vehicle trips per day.
The architecture of the project has a strong residential character and will be
coordinated between the various unit types proposed. The view of the higher density
portion of the project from adjacent property to the south and west is massive and
the site plan would benefit from either greater separation between the buildings,
fewer units, and/or a different arrangement of units on site, supplemented with
heavy landscaping to break up the overall building mass.
Staff feels that the development plan has considerable merit, is consistent with the
criteria of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance, and develops the site in a
sensitive way. It is Staff's recommendation that the concept plan be modified in
the central portion of the site, in order to require less grading and with a site
arrangement of buildings that would break up the total building mass.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend any of the following actions:
1. The Planning Commission could recommend approval of the Planned Unit
Development Concept Plan for 350 units on 40.7 acres based on plans Staff-
aci
Cardinal Creek Village 7 September 7, 1984
dated September 10, 1984, subject to the recommendations of the September 7,
1984, Staff Report. In addition, final site and development plans that
accompany any future rezoning, or platting, request for the central portion
of the site should involve less grading and a building arrangement that
would break up the total building mass;
Or,
2. The Planning Commission could recommend that the development plans be
returned to proponent for revisions based on the recommendations of the
Staff Report;
Or,
3. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the request.
10
veilcr[1:
.5111 C ain,
elr,rr
%.4,1 c" 4
UrCE 1,5\JL 611E vojr rtzuktick) crx) Wi14 Ae‘rh
off- gebloairtAL EcAl2
LOWER 1,5 n161. bri"E' At3ouT EuevAnoN 90 NITM Azie0
oFF LAcONAL e.REEK goA9
Im -rerlEmpire. LEiL IT Ascur t..EVACIai 915 w irfi
Ate.07/ OFF WcTH 1*./211761\11-11\i, gOAD
LowER LEOEL vrr. AtX-N/r F-LEWATION) eSo wrri4 ALLE.1.?
DifF Ci\i<OINAL CKEW ROAP
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Dec. 17, 1984
A. Cardinal Creek
Refer to memo dated December 13, 1984 from Bob Lambert, Director of
Community Services and staff report dated December 7, 1984.
Lambert introduced Fred Hoisington of the Chico Corporation who was
present at the meeting to review the Cardinal Creek Village PUD
request. Hoisington showed a site plan which included vegetation,
landscape and topography. He said this area is very steep and
difficult to develop. The project will include a variety of multi-
family housing from duplexes to apartment buildings and townhouses
which will be set into the hill to stop excessive noise from the
freeway. The developer does not propose any construction in the
floodplain area and said that the first phase of development would
be completed within the next two years, including recreation
facilities.
Kingrey asked where the NSP right-of-way line is located.
Hoisington showed its location on the site plan.
Hoisington agrees that the existing 5' walkway on the south and
east side of Cardinal Creek Road should be extended to Baker Road
and said he has only one objection to the staff report. That is
the construction of an 8' bikeway on the west side of Cardinal
Creek Road from Baker Road south. It is felt that a bikeway
located here would attract too many people from outside the
Cardinal Creek area.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES commIssIon Dec. 17, 1984
-4 -
Lambert said the rationale for the bikeway request is the same as
it is for bikeways in the rest of the city. He feels the sidewalk
should be extended and the bikeway added because this would provide
bikeway and pedestrian trails along Cardinal Creek Road where a
majority of the heavy traffic would be. It would also provide a
bikeway connection from the walkway to the floodplain north to
Baker Road, along the side of the road where a totlot, park shelter
and adult recreation area would be located.
Cook asked if the units that will be built would be for sale or
rental units. Hoisington said the townhouses and duplexes are
designed to be sold, but may not be sold immediately.
Cook then asked if the park would be maintained by an association.
Hoisington said that when the units are sold, they will be
maintained by as association.
Kingrey expressed concern about the fact that the ridge where these
units will be constructed will be highly visible from the freeway
and that even though the cut has been reduced to 25', he feels this
is still too much cut. He asked for more information regarding the
length of the berm. Hoisington said the hill will be extended to
the south and that no berm as such is planned. He added that if
the 25' cut is not done, no development can take place. It has
been ten years since the last development proposal and if this
development is not done, it may be years until the next proposal
so there is really no choice.
Kingrey said that he feels the highland has as much material value
as the creek itself.
Regarding the bikeway, Hoisington feels it would just add cost to
the project and it would be used very little. He said the
developer would put land aside for a bikeway in the future if
necessary.
Lambert suggested that a 5' sidewalk be constructed on the north
and east side of Cardinal Creek Road at this time and that a 10'
base be graded for a bikeway at a later date. This area would then
be seeded and mowed. Jessen suggested the existing sidewalk on the
west side be widened and Lambert said that this would be possible
but did not recommend it. He added that a bicycle pian easement
should be designated on the plat.
Schwartz questioned going through the steps of planning for a
bikeway if it will not be approved.
Jessen asked if there has been any park dedication proposed.
Lambert said it is not in the plan.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Dec. 17 ., 1984
-5 -
Hoisington asked if there was any credit given for dedication of
floodplain land. Lambert said no credit has been given in the
past.
Cook asked at what point the bikeway would be constructed. Jessen
said it would be sometime in the future at the City's expense.
MOTION: A motion was made by Schwartz to recommend that the floodplain
be dedicated with payment of the cash park fee and that grading for
the bikeway be done and that the sidewalk be constructed. Cook
seconded the motion and it carried 5-0.
Kingrey commented that although he was in favor of the proposal, he
Is still very concerned with the cut being made on the property.
13(1
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, November 13, 1984
School District Boardroom
7:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Chairman William Bearman, Virginia Gartner, Robert Hallett,
Dennis Marhula, Hakon Torjesen
Stan Johannes, Ed Schuck
Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Michael Franzen, Senior
Planner; Kate Karnas, Recording Secretary
Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION:
Motion was made by Torjesen, seconded by Gartner, to adopt the agenda as
printed.
Motion carried--5-0-0
II. MEMBERS REPORTS
None.
III. MINUTES
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to adopt the minutes of the
October 29, 1984, Planning Commission meeting as printed.
Motion carried--4-0-1 (Chairman Bearman abstained)
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. CARDINAL CREEK VILLAGE, by Chimo Development Corporation. Request
for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Environmental
Assessment Worksheet for 350 units of multiple family development on
40.7 acres. Location: North of Cardinal Creek, east of Baker Road.
A continued public hearing.
Mr. Fred Hoisington, representing proponent, reviewed the history of the
project to-date, and explained some of the changes made to the plan after
their meeting with the neighborhood on October 23, 1984.
Mr. Roger Freeburg, architect for proponent, reviewed the amended plan,
1;5
Planning Commission Minutes 2 November 13, 1984
showing how traffic had been redirected and how density had been shifted and
reduced on the property. He stated that there would not be a connection to
existing Cardinal Creek developments during the first and second phases of
development of this property according to the revised plan. The grading
plan had been revised to provide for less cut and fill than the previous
plan.
Mr. Hoisington stated that proponents had felt their plan was in conformance
with the Comprehensive Guide Plan in terms of density. Overall, 68% of the
site would be left as open space, leaving 32% of the property to be
developed. No variances were being requested for the development. With
respect to traffic, Mr. Hoisington stated that proponent's traffic
consultant had made the necessary studies for the development, which led to
the conclusion that there would be less impact on the existing developments
due to the fact that some of the existing residents would use the roads
through the new development. He added that every effort was being made to
protect the natural environments in the area. Lastly, Mr. Hoisington stated
it had been determined that there was adequate capacity for sewer, water,
storm sewer, and streets for this development as planned within the existing
City and County facilities in the area.
Per the Commission's request at their meeting of October 29, 1984, Staff had
prepared an analysis of net and gross densities of various multiple
residential projects within the City, and reviewed this with the Commission.
Mr. Jim Benshoof, traffic consultant for proponents, reviewed the findings
of the traffic study prepared by his firm for the revised development plan.
Hallett asked what the net and gross densities for this project would be.
Staff responded that the net density would be 7.7 units per acre; the gross
density would be 11.2 units per acre.
Chairman Bearman stated that, while the Comprehensive Guide Plan allowed a
maximum number of units within residential areas, this should not be taken
to mean that the developers were automatically allowed to develop at that
maximum density; rather, the merits of the plan would dictate where in the
range of densities a certain plan could be recommended for approval. He
added that economics of a project would not have an impact on any Planning
Commission recommendation regarding a project.
Chairman Bearman asked if any resolution had been reached with the land
owner to the north regarding access. Mr. Hoisington responded that the
proponents were still working with the land owner to the north and would
continue to do so.
Chairman Beaman stated that he felt the project revisions were good, but
that additional work may be necessary. He suggested that the townhouse
units be removed from the area south of the major road through the site and
that the density be reduced to approximately 285 units.
Torjesen asked if Cardinal Creek 3rd Addition, the duplex development, was
developed as Medium Density Residential. Staff responded that the zoning of
the project was RM-6.5, however the Comprehensive Guide Plan showed the
property as Low Density Residential. Gross density for Cardinal Creek 3rd
Ii
Planning Commission Minutes 3 November 13, 1984
Addition was 2.5 units per acre and net density was over three units per
acre. Staff explained that this was similar to the situation for the
multiple residential area of Arbor Glen, to the west.
Torjesen stated that he felt the Comprehensive Guide Plan densities and the
densities allowed by Zoning Districts should be more coordinated. He
suggested that this be a topic for the joint Planning Commission/City
Council meeting in December.
Torjesen added that he felt the type of development proposed for the
Cardinal Creek Village development did not compare with the densities of
other multiple projects in that vicinity, such as St. John's Woods. Planner
Enger pointed out that while St. John's Woods was developed at approximately
6.5 units per acre, there was no open space dedication with the project and
a much larger percentage of the property was developed compared to what was
being proposed for Cardinal Creek Village. The area south of the major road
through Cardinal Creek Village was proposed at a net density of 4.56 units
per acre, and with the flood plain area included, a gross density of 2.58
units per acre. North of the major road, the property was proposed at 10.54
units per acre for gross density and 11.9 units per acre for net density.
Hallett asked if "rumble strips" to slow traffic had been considered for
Cardinal Creek Road through the existing Cardinal Creek developments. Staff
responded that the developers had been considering other alternatives, such
as making the road more circuitous through this area and perhaps providing a
"T" intersection with existing Cardinal Creek Road to make it less desirable
as a through-street. "Rumble strips" may, or may not, be an appropriate
answer for slowing or eliminating traffic through this area.
Gartner asked for explanation of what traffic patterns would be for the
revised development plans. Mr. Jim Benshoof, proponent's traffic
consultant, explained the traffic patterns in detail, indicating that
approximately 65% of the traffic from the development would take a northerly
route, while 35% of the traffic from the development would take a southerly
route. He pointed out that the design of the road through the project was
such that it would make it easier, even for residents in the south half of
the project, to access Baker Road from the north point of major road through
the project, instead of routing south through the existing Cardinal Creek
neighborhoods.
Torjesen asked to what extent the construction of the Crosstown Freeway
would impact the traffic analysis. Mr. Benshoof responded that the figures
he prepared were based on the Crosstown Freeway being extended.
Hallett asked if the Metropolitan Council data upon which Mr. Benshoof had
based part of his analysis took into consideration the location of City
facilities and schools. Mr. Benshoof responded that this was the case to a
point. Gartner asked what the date of the Metropolitan Council data was.
Mr. Benshoof responded that he obtained the data early in 1984; however he
was not certain as to the date the information was prepared. The
information was prepared based on year 2000 projections for traffic by the
Metropolitan Council.
Mr. Gordon Alexander, 6895 Sand Ridge Road, expressed concern regarding
11
Planning Commission Minutes 4 November 13, 1984
traffic. He stated that it did not seem possible that the traffic on
existing Cardinal Creek Road may be decreased by as much as 75 vehicles per
daras represented by proponent's traffic consultant. He also stated that
he did not feel it made sense to have the lowest density of the project
located just across the street from the highest density of the project
without providing transition, or buffering, within the project itself. He
stated that he would prefer existing Cardinal Creek Road to remain as a cul-
de-sac.
Mr. Dick Clasen, 6898 Edgebrook Place, expressed concern regarding
transition from the existing to the proposed units. He stated that they had
been told at the time of purchase of their home that the development to the
north would be twin homes, or townhouses. Mr. Clasen stated that it
appeared to him that the highest density of the project would be the most
visible portion of the project as it was located at the highest elevation of
the property on a hill. He suggested that the visibility of these units
from other locations be considered. Mr. Clasen added that he felt there
were errors in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet provided by the
developers.
Mr. Floyd Siefferman, Jr., 6997 Edgebrook Place, listed several concerns,
including: transition from the existing Cardinal Creek neighborhoods,
suggesting that a tier of R1-13.5 ioning be added between the proposed
higher density units and the existing single family homes; run-off into Nine
Mile Creek; stability of soils during the grading process, especially
adjacent to the existing developments; potential confusion with identical
street names, i.e. the existing Cardinal Creek Road and naming of the major
road through the site Cardinal Creek Road; lack of a mini-park within the
development; potential violation of Pollution Control Agency noise
standards; two internal cul-de-sacs of the development shown as over 500 ft.
in length; one street within the proposed development exceeded an 8% grade;
no connection be allowed between the existing Cardinal Creek developments
and the proposed development until construction of the entire development is
completed to avoid problems with construction traffic through the existing
neighborhood; the transition area should be provided on the developer's
property; the natural areas and topographic features be preserved as much as
possible; and, the development be designed in such a way as not to exceed
the approved densities for other Medium Density Residential developments in
the area at RM-6.5, or approximately 160 units for the entire development.
Mr. Siefferman also asked if the City had adopted the amended 1982
Comprehensive Guide Plan as he was unable to find record of its adoption.
Staff responded that it had been adopted by the City and approved for
adoption by the Metropolitan Council.
Mr. Philip Moenning, 6956 Sand Ridge Road, expressed concern that transition
be provided between the existing and proposed uses. He stated that the
existing and proposed units would be as little as 400 ft. apart and that he
felt greater distance between the unit types would be appropriate.
Mr. Doug Reuter, 8750 Black Maple Drive, stated that he did not feel Planned
Unit Developments benefitted the City, but only benefitted the developers,
by allowing for general plan approvals, instead of specific approvals. He
stated that he felt once a Planned Unit Development was approved, it became
difficult for the City to control the development of the property in
question.
ffl
Planning Commission Minutes 5 November 13, 1984
Ms. Christina Siefferman, 6997 Edgebrook Place, stated that all the schools,
department stores, grocery stores, public facilities, such as fire stations,
etc.; were located south of the development and she questioned whether
future residents of the new development would actually take a northerly
route out of their neighborhoods to the extent suggested by the traffic
consultants.
Gartner asked if the three-story buildings were cut into the hill. Mr.
Freeburg responded that they had been located in a valley between high
points in the topography of the property.
Mr. Clasen, 6898 Edgebrook Place, stated that the Staff Report also pointed
out that the buildings were massive in size.
Mr. Hoisington responded to several of the questions raised by residents.
He stated that the development, as proposed, was not in violation of any
Shoreland Ordinance requirements. The noise levels represented within the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet were taken by a reputable firm, and
conditions at that time, such as the fact that snow was on the ground, were
compensated for in reporting of the results within the Worksheet. He stated
that the northerly cul-de-sac which was over 500 ft. in length was intended
to provided access to a landlocked parcel in the future. Potentially, the
road would not have to be built until such time as it could be looped
through the property to the north; however, proponents felt it was their
obligation to provide opportunity for access to this parcel.
Hallett stated that he felt multiple residential projects provided viable
alternatives to development of property with natural features that single
family development did not, in that units were clustered, or consolidated,
and more natural features could be preserved in the long run. He expressed
concern about the density proposed. He suggested that the density be
reduced to be more closely in conformance with other multiple residential
developments in the vicinity, rather than being the most dense project
within a one-mile radius. Hallett reiterated concern from the previous
meeting regarding a crossing of Baker Road for the children on the east side
of Baker Road. He stated that, due to the location of the school and the
park across the road, many children would migrate that direction and that
the parents should take every step possible to make certain a safe crossing
for them was developed.
Gartner stated that she felt the traffic concerns could be mitigated. She
stated that she was not necessarily against long cul-de-sacs. Gartner added
that she, too, felt the project was still too dense, but that the transition
of open space along the south portion of the project was effective.
Torjesen stated that he, also, was concerned with the density of the
proposal, adding that he felt transition was not so much a concern as
determining a proper density for the site.
Marhula stated that he believed the connection of neighborhoods was
beneficial. He expressed concern for the amount of density also, suggesting
that less density and perhaps spreading out of the density would aid in
transition for the property as well. Marhula stated that he felt traffic
concerns could be mitigated with small adjustments to the site design. He
Planning Commission Minutes 7 November 13, 1984
Mrs. Harvey Olsen, 7964 Timber Lakes Drive, stated that she had also paid a
lot premium for view of the lake and that proposed Building #3 would block
that view. She suggested that one of the structures be removed and added
that she concurred with concerns regarding obstructed access to garages.
Gartner stated that she felt there was too much site coverage by parking
areas, driveways, and buildings, that the site was too tightly designed.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Torjesen to continue the public
hearing to the November 26, 1984, Planning Commission meeting to allow
proponent time to revise the plans per the concerns of the Planning
Commission and the findings of the Staff Report of November 9, 1984.
Motion carried--5-0-0
C. AXEL DENTAL OFFICE, by Richard C. Axel. Request for Zoning District
Change within Office District for a Dental Office and Preliminary
Plat of 0.9 acre for one lot. Location: Southwest quadrant of
Highway #5 and County Road #4. A public hearing.
Dr. Richard Axel reviewed the plans for, development of the dental office
with the Planning Commission. Planner Franzen reviewed the findings of the
Staff Report of November 9,1984.
Marhula asked if, at the time of the originally approved Planned Unit
development for this site, a design framework manual had been required for
the future uses within this development. Staff responded that it had not
been required at that time. Marhula stated that he supported a
recommendation for the structure using brick as its major exterior material.
Torjesen stated that he had no objection to the use of wood as the main
exterior material.
Staff discussed the orientation of the structure on the lot with the
Planning Commission, with respect to the future addition planned to the
building. The Commission concurred that the recommended Staff alternative
to the building location and design was preferrable.
Mr. Steven Beck, 15301 Creekside Court, asked about the access drive for
joint use by adjacent parcels. Dr. Axel reviewed it further.
MOTION 1:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Marhula, to close the public
hearing.
Motion carried--5-0-0
MOTION 2:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded Marhula, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Richard C. Axel for Zoning District
116
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
Monday, Octbber 15, 1984
School District Offices, Room 5
7:30 p.m.
• Chairman William Bearman, Virginia Gartner, Robert Hallett,
Dennis Marhula, Ed Schuck (9:15 p.m.), Hakon Torjesen
Stan Johannes
Chris Enger, Director of Planning; Kate Karnas, Recording
Secretary
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBER ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Pledge of Allegiance--Roll Call
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Torjesen, to adopt the agenda as
printed.
Motion carried--5-0-0
II. MEMBERS REPORTS
None.
III. MINUTES
MOTION:
Motion was made by Marhula, seconded by Gartner, to adopt the minutes of the
September 24, 1984, Planning Commission meeting as printed.
Motion carried--4-0-1 (Chairman Bearman abstained)
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. CARDINAL CREEK VILLAGE, by Chimo Development Corporation. Request
for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Environmental
Assessment Worksheet for 350 units of multiple family development on
40.7 acres. Location: North of Cardinal Creek, east of Baker Road.
A continued public hearing.
Prior to the meeting, Planning Staff had received a letter from proponents
requesting continuance of the item to the October 29, 1984, Planning
Commission meeting to allow them more time to hold another neighborhood
Planning Commission Minutes 2 October 15, 1984
meeting regarding the proposal. Revised plans would be submitted to the
Planning Staff for review after the additional neighborhood input.
Mr. Greg Kellenberger, representing proponents, stated that the neighborhood
meeting would be held at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 1984, at the
Forest Hills Elementary School. However, Mr. Kellenberger said the notice
had stated that the postponement would be to the October 29, 1984, Planning
Commission meeting, not the November 13, 1984, meeting.
Mr. Floyd Siefferman, 6997 Edgebrook Place, asked if there was any way the
residents could be notified of the change since the notice from the
proponents stated that the meeting would be reconvened on October 29th, not
November 13th. Staff stated that notices would be sent in time from City
Hall making note of the difference in dates.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Hallett, to continue the public
hearing for Cardinal Creek Village to the November 13, 1984, Special
Planning Commission meeting.
Motion carried--5-0-0
142.
Planning Commission Minutes 5 September 10, 1984
C. CARDINAL CREEK VILLAGE, by Chico Development Corporation. Request
for Planned Unit Development Concept Review and Environmental
Assessment Worksheet for 350 units of multiple family development on
40.7 acres. Location: North of Cardinal Creek, east of Baker Road.
A public hearing.
Mr. Mark Jones, a partner in Chico Development, reviewed a history of the
developers and the types of structures they had built within the
metropolitan area. Mr. Fred Hoisington presented slides showing the site
characteristics and proposed development features. He pointed out the nine
acres of flood plain which would be preserved by their development. He also
pointed out the location of the Northern States Power easement, through
which no building would be allowed. Mr. Hoisington stated that
approximately one-third of the site would be preserved in permanent open
space with a combination of these two areas. Approximately 80% of this site
was in grass lands. The total proposed density for this site was 8.6 units
per acre.
Mr. Roger Freeburg, architect for proponents, reviewed the architectural
styles proposed at the various locations on site. Mr. Jeff Gustafson, one
Planning Commission Minutes 6 September 10, 1984
of the development partners, stated that throughout development of Cardinal
Creek first, second, and third additions, they had tried to keep everyone
Informed within the neighborhood of the potential for multiple residential
development within this area. He stated that this included the fact that
the road would have to be continued through this site for better and safe
access through the property.
Planner Franzen . reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Staff
Report, dated September 7, 1984, with the Planning Commission.
Chairman Bearman asked if a density transfer from the flood plain areas was
being requested by proponents. Planner Enger responded that in other cases,
the City had allowed transfer of density from flood plain areas, but, not
from areas that were designated as wetlands by the Department of Natural
Resources. He added that proponents' site plan was in compliance with these
guidelines. Chairman Bearman asked if developers were allowed to build
within a flood plain. Planner Enger responded that the Nine-Mile Creek
Board of Governors would allow fill of up to 20 percent of a flood plain
area, depending upon the situation and the methods used for filling.
Torjesen asked to what extent the City had allowed density transfer from
flood plains in the past. Planner Enger responded that there were very few
cases, if any, where the City had not allowed City transfer from a flood
plain area.
Marhula asked if this project would be encroaching upon any wetland areas or
public waters. Staff stated that this was not the case, and that the City
had not allowed density transfer from public waters areas. However, there
were situations where density transfer was allowed from wetland areas.
Planner Enger pointed out that the only portion of this site that qualified
as public waters was the creek, itself. Mr. Hoisington pointed out that a
Type 3 wetland did exist which consisted of approximately one-quarter to
one-half acre. However, this wetland area did not qualify as public waters
according to the Department of Natural Resources.
Torjesen asked what densities matched up with RM-2.5 and RM-6.5 zoning
districts. Staff responded that 17.4 units per acre would coincide with RN-
2.5 zoning and that approximately seven units per acre would coincide with
RM-6.5 zoning. Torjesen stated that he felt that there was incongruity
between the Guide Plan and Zoning Ordinance which should be rectified.
Torjesen asked what the density of Kings Forest, to the west, had been
approved for, considering their flood plain area. Staff responded that
Kings Forest had been approved at approximately three to four units per acre
and that approximately one-third of the property was designated as flood
plain area. Staff added that St. John's Woods had been approved at a
density of over seven units per acre.
Chairman Bearman stated that he was concerned about the grading required of
the central hill. He stated that he would prefer to increase the density at
the northern end of the property and lessen the density towards the south in
order to avoid such severe grading of the hill.
Torjesen stated that everything in this area was less dense than the project
Planning Commission Minutes 7 September 10, 1984
being proposed by proponents.
Hallett asked if the Cash Park Fee would be applicable to this project.
Staff responded that it would be. Hallett also asked if walkways were
planned for the area. Staff responded that sidewalks were shown along
Cardinal Creek Road.
Chairman Bearman asked if all the roads in the project were public roads.
Planner Franzen responded that there were some private and some public
roads. Chairman Bearman asked if there would be Homeowners' Association
established for purposes of maintenance of the roads and other private
facilities shown on the property. Mr. Hoisington responded that there would
be a Homeowners' Association; however, it was possible that there would be
more than one such association.
Gartner asked what the average price of the units would be. Mr. Hoisington
responded that the average price of the units would be $100,000.
Chairman Bearman asked about the future road shown at the northeast portion
of the property. Mr. Hoisington responded that in order to service a
currently land-locked piece of property, in that area, this road had been
shown as a potential access to the property.
Mr. Gordon Alexander, Jr., 6895 Sand Ridge Road, stated that he felt the
sizes of the trees shown in the elevations by the proponents was misleading.
He stated that the residents of the area had been promised that luxury
townhouses would be built in this area, not apartments or higher density
residential units.
Mr. Alexander stated that Cardinal Creek Road was a rather curvy and hilly
road, with many blind spots along the way. He stated that he did not
believe it was appropriate to change Cardinal Creek Road into a collector
street for this residential area to the north. He stated that he felt it
would place an undue burden on the neighborhood and would place the children
of the area in jeopardy of their safety. Mr. Alexander suggested a more
gradual transition between the single family homes and the multi-family
homes proposed by proponent.
Mr. Alexander stated that Eden Prairie should protect the children, who
often will play in the streets, from a traffic hazard such as Cardinal Creek
Road would be, if allowed to carry the traffic from this new development.
He stated that he felt the safety hazard, which would result from this
development, was an unacceptable alternative to the members of the
comnunity. Mr. Alexander added that he felt the density was too high in
this area. Mr. Alexander presented the Comnission with a petition signed by
many of the residents in the vicinity explaining their concerns and
objections to the project as proposed.
Planner Enger explained the traffic patterns which would likely result from
the development of the property. He stated that, based upon rough
estimates, the amount of traffic on Cardinal Creek Road through the existing
single family and duplex area would increase approximately ten percent, or,
by approximately 20 cars during the peak hours and a total of 200 cars in
one single day.
145
Planning Commission Minutes 8 September 10, 1984
Torjesen stated that Cardinal Creek Road, as it currently existed, wa
s
a
very long dead-end cul-de-sac in the City, with serious public saf
e
t
y
problems. The homes in this area would have only one possible access,
a
s
currently shown, for safety vehicles of any.type should an emergency ari
s
e
.
Torjesen stated that during every hearing involving the Cardinal Cr
e
e
k
Development, the City had discussed how long they would allow this cul-
d
e
-
sac to exist without being connected to a secondary access into
t
h
e
neighborhood for safety reasons. He stated that he was certain that ev
e
r
y
hearing he had attended, it had been stated that this road must be exten
d
e
d
through to allow for additional access to the area for safety purpos
e
s
.
Torjesen suggested that there may be other ways to design this project
s
u
c
h
that almost all of the traffic would use routes, other than the exist
i
n
g
portion of Cardinal Creek Road, for access and egress from the property.
Ms. Jeanne Lind, 6909 Edgebrook Place, stated that she did not feel
t
h
a
t
Cardinal Creek Road was designed to take additional traffic in this a
r
e
a
.
She stated that there was a bend in the road with a sharp turn thr
o
u
g
h
which, at this time, construction traffic would travel at nearly 40 m
i
l
e
s
per hour. She stated that she felt this was a traffic hazard, due to
t
h
e
number of children in the area. She stated that she felt additional tra
f
f
i
c
would jeopardize the lives of the children and their safety in this are
a
.
Mr. Kevin Kuester, 13124 Cardinal Creek Road, expressed concern for the
l
a
c
k
of protective barriers for run-off from construction and the resul
t
a
n
t
damage to this creek. He stated that he had witnessed grading within
2
5
t
o
30 feet of the creek. Mr. Kuester stated that he was also concerned
w
i
t
h
the lack of action being taken by the developer on the removal of dis
e
a
s
e
d
elm trees within the area.
Mr. Floyd Sieffermann, 6997 Edgebrook Place, stated that he fel
t
t
h
e
developers had made a choice to purchase the land--no one had forced t
h
e
m
t
o
do so. He stated that the flood plain and the Northern States Pow
e
r
easement were part of this land purchase. Mr. Sieffermann stated th
a
t
h
e
felt a transition was needed from the single family to the higher densi
t
y
units proposed by the developers. He also expressed concern that
t
h
e
easement along the north edge of the property, providing access to Ba
k
e
r
Road, was not adequate for access to the entire site. Mr. Siefferma
n
n
stated that, to his knowledge, there was no direct access to the west
t
o
Baker Road. He stated that he felt a cul-de-sac would be better for
t
h
e
children in the area for the current portion of Cardinal Creek Road wh
i
c
h
was already constructed.
Mr. Sieffermann stated that he was concerned with the findings of
a
n
Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the project. He expressed conc
e
r
n
for the sedimentation into Nine-Mile Creek from the development of
t
h
i
s
area. Mr. Siefferman stated that he felt the history of the performance of
the developers in this area was not good. He stated that there were tires
and signs in the creek. Mr. Siefferman implied that the Gustafson's were
responsible for this. Chairman Beaman asked Mr. Sieffermann if he could
prove that the developers were responsible. Mr. Sieffermann stated that he
could not. Chairman Beaman stated that, while he was aware that
construction work could result in much damage, he felt, too, that it was
inappropriate to make accusations or innuendos without proof.
14G
Planning Commission Minutes 9 September 10,1984
Mr. Sieffermann continued listing his concerns, stating that he felt the
size of the units proposed were small. He added that he felt the three-
story structures were out of character with the development of this area.
Mr. Siefferman, again, expressed concern for the safety of the children in
this area, if Cardinal Creek Road were to be extended through the project to
the existing area. He suggested that the developers should find two
entrances to Baker Road instead of accessing the existing Cardinal Creek
area.
Mr. Oscar Miller, 6521 Baker Road, stated that the easement for access to
this property had been granted many years ago. Mr. Miller stated that,
while he had no objection to the proposed location of a roadway, he was not
interested in paying for a portion of the street, which would overwhelmingly
benefit others than himself. Mr. Miller added that he had no objection to
the development in general.
Mr. Miller stated that he felt the Cardinal Creek residents had a valid
concern regarding the traffic in the area and the resultant traffic from the
development proposed. He suggested that the developers find alternative
access possibilities in order to avoid the situation as much as possible.
Mr. Harold Griffiths, 6401 Kurtz Lane, stated that he was the owner of the
land-locked parcel to the northeast of the Cardinal Creek Village proposal.
He stated that he was unaware of the developers plans for providing access
to his property. Chairman Bearman suggested that Mr. Griffiths and the
proponents meet to discuss their mutual needs for this property. Mr.
Hoisington stated that he would do so shortly.
Mr. Roland Baumann, 13200 Cardinal Creek Road, stated that, for his
household, he would take two trips to and from the north of the existing
Cardinal Creek area, however, the remaining trips, for example for shopping
and service needs, were made to the south by other members of his household.
He expressed concern that this would be true for many of the future
homeowners in the Cardinal Creek Village area.
Mr. Steve Anderson, 13728 Cardinal Creek Road, stated that he had very
recently purchased a home in the existing Cardinal Creek area. He stated
that he had several reasons for purchasing the home, which included the
children's safety, the education available in the area, home security, the
scenic views from the area, and the nice character of the existing
neighborhood. He stated that he hoped none of this would be jeopardized by
this development proposal.
Mr. Scott Anderson, 6825 Stonewood Court, stated that when he had purchased
his home, the developers had shown him the exact plans which were being
presented to the Planning Commission. He added that his concerns then were
the same as they are now, that being the childrens safety. Mr. Anderson
suggested that the matters of traffic could perhaps be controlled through a
series of stop signs within the area.
Chairman Beaman recapped some of the concerns noted by the residents,
including: density, traffic, connection of neighborhoods, construction
traffic, traffic controls, access, and, in particular with regard to access,
provision of adequate access to the property to the northeast.
I til
L.)
Planning Commission Minutes 10 September 10, 1984
Hallett stated that he was not as concerned about "long cul-de-sacs" and
felt that if people chose to live on long cul-de-sacs that they were making
a conscious choice regarding safety vehicle access. He added that he felt
the City needed many types of housing in .this community. Hallett stated
that, perhaps the density could be moved further to the north with less
dense housing existing to the south to provide more transition to the single
family and duplex units within the existing Cardinal Creek area. Hallett
asked what the chances were of not having Mr. Miller share in any of the
cost for extention of the roadway adjacent to, and possibly on, his
property. Mr. Hoisington stated that proponents would be willing to work
with the City in whatever manner they felt acceptable for assessing or
deferring assessment of cost for the road as it would involve Mr. Miller's
property.
Hallett stated that he felt the neighborhood would also have a concern in
the near future with safe access across Baker Road to the park area which
existed there. He stated that, with their concern for the children's
safety, the neighbors should stay involved in the safety situations for the
area.
Torjesen stated that he felt an RM-6.5 zoning would be an appropriate
framework for the development. He stated that he felt this would be
consistent with development of other properties in the area. Torjesen added
that he felt development should proceed only on the assumption that access
to Baker Road, directly west, be developed.
Torjesen stated that he felt strongly that the road between the Miller
property and the Cardinal Creek Village property, as well as the access to
the property to the south, connecting existing and proposed Cardinal Creek
Roads, should be carefully planned in order to provide the least impact upon
the existing homes and residents in the area.
Marhula stated that he felt the impact on the creek of urban run-off should
be evaluated prior to the next meeting. He stated that he disagreed with
Torjesen regarding the RM-6.5 "cap" for this development. He stated that he
felt that a proper transition and higher density could be accomplished well
within the limits of the Guide Plan, and within the satisfactory limits of
both the developer and the existing property owners. Marhula stated that it
may be appropriate, or necessary, to cluster density, which would possibly
require RM-2.5 zoning, and provide a better site plan for the area.
Torjesen stated that this would be acceptable to him, if the site plan were
appropriate.
MOTION:
Motion was made by Gartner, seconded by Schuck, to continue the public
hearing to the October 15, 1984, Special Planning Commission meeting, to
allow proponent to revise the plans based on the Staff Report of September
7, 1984, and the concerns reviewed by the Planning Commission at their
meeting of September 10, 1984.
Motion carried--6-0-0
DECEMBER 31,1984
17;7 3 VOID OUT CHECK
11 , VOID OUI CHECK
17740 GRIGGS BEER DIST INC
17/41 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
17742 UNITED STATES POLICE ASSOC
17743 NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMERGENCY ME
17744 BEER WHOLESALERS INC
17745 SHELDON KLUKAS
17746 RALPH KRATOCHVIL
17747 DANA GIBBS
17748 QUALITY WINE CO
17749 CAPITOL CITY DISIRIBUTING CO
17750 TWIN CITY WINE CO
17751 EAGLE WINE CO
17752 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
17753 PRIOR WINE CO
17754 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
17755 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO
17756 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
17757 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
17758 CPT CORP
17759 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC
17760 MN DEPT OF P/S
17761 MN DEPT OF P/S
17762 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
1 7 "c3 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
BEER
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW RD
DUES-POLICE DEPT
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT
BEER
REFUND-EXERCISE CLASS
INSTRUCTOR-EXERCISE CLASSES/FEE PD
PACKET DELIVERY
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
1985 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT POLICE DEPT
CITY WEST JOGGING TRAIL-PLANNING DEPT
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
SERVICE
NOVEMBER 84 SALES TAX
2560.80-
107.39
859.05
155.00
80.00
15.00
3931.15
17.00
8.00
26.00
3129.91
838.64
3406.93
522.10
265.90
576.94
7395.67
1077.45
7826.90
3746.64
1548.00
8893.21
10.75
8.75
13536.77
15011.41
56570.00
30.00
110.00
6.95
165.00
61.70
702.90
29.47
17568.77
9120.86
12309.30
106.00
35.00
4110.00
18.00
103.75
570.00
37.50
15122.78
847.60
39.00
53.87
91.50
465.25
2067.6';
2163.5
765.24
17764 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE RELIEF CITY PORTION OF FIRE DEPT PENSION
17765 NORTHERN MESSANGER EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT
17766 SPEEDY PRINTING NEWSLETTER FOR SENIOR CENTER
17767 REBECCA BAKER REFUND-PRE-NATAL CLASSES
17768 JOHN FRANE DECEMBER EXPENSES
17769 WENDY BURNS CARLSON SKATING INSTRUCTORS-FEES PD
17770 HOPKINS POSTMASTER BROCHURE MAILING
17771 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER
17772 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 12/21/84
17773 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 12/21/84
17774 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS PAYROLL 12/21/84
17775 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 12/21/84
17776 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 12/21/84
17777 GREAT WEST LIFE INSURANCE CO PAYROLL 12/21/84
17778 PERA PAYROLL 12/21/84
17779 UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS PAYROLL 12/21/84
17780 NORM:ST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLL 12/21/84
17781 SUBURBAN NATIONAL BANK PAYROLL 12/21/84
17782 PERA PAYROLL 12/21/84
17783 Jin WALTER PAPERS XEROX PAPER-CITY HALL
17784 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES
17785 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-COMMUNITY SERVICES
6 GREEN ACRES RECREATION SNOWTUBING-CO•MUNITY SERVICES
I,. d7 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO WINE
17788 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR
17789 JOHNSON I n ROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR LIQUOR
17790 QUALM WINE CO WINE
19349064
150
17791 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
17792 PRIOR WINE CO
17793 TWIN CITY WINE CO
177 4 EAGLE WINE CO
17 ED PHILLIPS 1; SONS CO
17 b U S POSTMASTER
17797 LARKIN ARMOUR
17798 COLLETTE MEYER •
17799 MICHELLE VEICHT
17800 CHRIS HIVELY
17801 REID HORNBACHER
17802 BRYCE BRENNEMAN
17803 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
17804 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
17805 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
17806 PERA
17807 MINNESOTA GAS COMPANY
17808 WHIZ PRINT INC
17809 BRIAN BENDEL
17810 WALDENBOOKS
17811 NORTHWEST SCIENTIFIC LAB
5436069
WINE
317.27
WINE
96.29
WINE
1024.36
WINE
244.12
LIQUOR
4318.55
POSTAGE-1985 HOMESTEAD CARDS
1098.03
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
13.00
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
13.00
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
25.00
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
13.00
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
25.00
REFUND-SKATING CLASSES
10.00
PAYROLL 12/31/84
13743.54
PAYROLL 12/31/84
6412.22
PAYROLL 12/31/84
7564.14 i
PAYROLL 12/31/84
9635.43
SERVICE
9417.37
PRINTING-COMMUNITY SERVICES
17.20
REFUND-SKI TRIP
14.75
BOOKS-COMMUNITY CENTER
83.42
SERVICE-POLICE DEPT
275.00
$247851.33
December 31, 1984 '
CASH DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND NUMBER
120982.12
37220.30
19087.88
5067.44
30.38
8893.21
56570.00
10 GENERAL
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
82 FIRE RELIEF FUND
$247851.33
151
JANUARY 8,1985
17 2 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
U S POSTMASTER'
17814 AMERICAN SCEINTIFIC PRODUCTS
17815 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY
17816 A T 0 M
17817 JOHNSON BROTHERS WHOLESALE LIQUOR
17818 EAGLE WINE CO
17819 INTERCONTINENTAL PCKG CO
17820 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
17821 TWIN CITY WINE CO
17822 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
17823 QUALITY WINE CO
17824 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
17825 CAPITOL CITY DISTRIBUTING CO
17826 WORLD CLASS WINE
17827 ORRIN ALT
17828 RON ANDERSON
17829 ANNETTE BEACH
17830 BILL BLAKE
17831 BRIAN BLANCH
17832 MICHAEL BOSACKER
17833 LANCE BRACE
17834 LES BRIDGER
17835 THOMAS BROWN
17836 DANIEL CARLSON
JAMES CLARK
la$38 JOHN CONLEY
17839 JOYCE CONLEY
17840 KYLE DUCHSCHERE
17841 JACK HACKING
17842 DONNA HYATT
17843 JAMES KLINE
17844 JANET KOCH
17845 MOLLY KOIVUMAKI
17846 ALLEN LARSON
17847 JAMES LINDGREN
17848 TRACY LUKE
17849 JAMES MATSON
17850 SANDRA MITCHELL
17851 CURT OBERLANDER
17852 PAULINE OLSON
17853 DENNIS PAULSON
17854 RICK RABENORT
17855 JOHN SORENSEN
17856 KEITH WALL
17857 CHUCK WALLACE
17858 JULIE WANQUIST
17859 STEPHEN WHITE
17860 STUART ALEXANDER
1 7 R51 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
62 AMI PRODUCTS INC
17863 EARL I:ANDERSEN &ASSOC INC
17864 THE ASPHALT INSTITUTE
17865 ASPLUND COFFEE CO INC
17866 AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SERVICE
POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
1985 DUES-POLICE DEPT
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985'UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1985 MILEAGE
LIGHT BULBS-POLICE DEPT
HOSE/COUPLER/ADAPTER-EQUIP MAINTENANCE
TRAFFIC SIGNS-SIREET DEPT & COMM CENTER
BOOK-ENG DEPT
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER
SERVICE
15757.96
200.00
59.53
32.95
20.00
1912.04
879.24
107.45
2049.16
112.41
2447.02
1398.19
76.82
327.24
25.33
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
350.00
401.59
125.00
400.00
400.00
125.00
400.00
400.00
125.00
400.00
125.00
40100
350.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
350.00
125.00
350.00
48.75
16.50
120.22
5.00
174..,10
768.00
3835478
17867 AT & 1* INFORMATION SYSTEMS
17868 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY
17869 BACHMAN'S
17870 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC
17871 B R W INC
BLOOMINGTON LOCKSMITH CO
17873 LOIS BOETTCHER
17874 BOLLIG & SONS INC
17875 BRAUN ENG TESTING INC
17876 ANDREA BROSCH
17877 BUILDERS ENGINEERING CO
17878 BUSINESS FURNITURE INC
17879 BUTCHS BAR SUPPLY
17880 C 0 CARLSON AIR CONDITIONING CO
17881 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO
17882 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS
17883 C & N W TRANS CO
17884 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
17885 COPY EQUIPMENT INC
17886 CROWN RUBBER STAMP CO
17887 CUTLER MAGNER CO
17888 WARD F DAHLBERG
17889 WARD F DAHLBERG
17890 DALCO
17891 EUGENE DIETZ
17892 EAU CLAIRE COUNTY
17893 EDEN PRAIRIE BODY SHOP
17894 EDEN PRAIRIE CLEANERS
17895 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272
1(
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 01ST #272
17097 CITY OF EDINA
17898 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
17899 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
17900 EMERGENCY SERVICE SYSTEM INC
17901 EMPIRE-CROWN AUTO INC
17902 CHRIS ENGER
17903 RON ESS
17904 FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS
17905 FARMERS STEEL CO
17906 CREDIT PUBLISHING CO
17907 FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORP
17908 JAN FLYNN
17909 GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS INC
17910 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTERS
17911 GRAPHIC CONTROLS CORP
17912 GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA
17913 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
17914 HARMON GLASS
17915 HARMON GLASS & GLAZING INC
17916 HEDBERG & SONS CO
17917 HEEBINK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC
17918 HENNEPIN COUNTY
17919 DIRECTOR OF LICENSING
SERVICE
PAINT-EQUIP MAINTENANCE
FLOWERS - CITY HALL
AIR FILTERS-POLICE DEPT
-SERVICE-EDEN RD/ANDERSON LK PKWY/VALLEY
VIEW ROAD/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
REPAIR LOCK-BLDG DEPT
MINUTES-PARK & REC COMMISSION MEETING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
SERVICE FLYING CLOUD DRIVE
RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD
ADDITIONAL COST FOR TUBE SLIDE-STARING LK
3 CHAIRS/BLDG DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
SERVICE - P/S AIR CONDITIONER
REPAIR COOLING SYSTEM-LIQUOR STORE
REPAIR SAW-FORESTRY DEPT
1985 LEASE AGREEMENT
SERVICE PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING
DESK SIGNS-CITY HALL
QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT
DECEMBER EXPENSES
JANUARY 85 EXPENSES
CLEANING SUPPLIES-POLICE & COMM CENTER
DECEMBER EXPENSES
WITHHOLDING FROM EMPLOYEE PER COURT ORDER
REPAIR CAR
CLEAN BLANKETS-FIRE DEPT
NOVEMBER 84 CUSTODIAL SERVICE
JULY-OCT 84 BLDG RENTAL-COMMUNITY ED
NOVEMBER 84 TESTS
SAFETY CAP RACK SEAT-WATER DEPT
SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
WIRE SQUAD CARS
FLOOR MATS/MUD FLAPS-POLICE DEPT
DECEMBER 84 EXPENSES
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
TESTS-POLICE DEPT
PIPE-PARK MAINTENANCE
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
REPAIR GENERATOR-FIRE DEPT
OCT-DEC 84 MILEAGE-SENIOR CENTER
RADIO REPAIRS & PARTS
4 SNOW TIRES/12 TIRE TUBES-EQUIP MAINT
SUPPLIES - WATER DEPT
1985 DUES-ASSESSING DEPT
ELECTRICAL SERVICE-ROUND LAKE PARK
GLASS-PARK MAINTENANCE
WINDOW-COMMUNITY CENTER
CONCRETE -P/S BLDG
FORMICA MATERIAL-P/S BLDG
NOVEMBER 84 BOARD OF PRISONERS
NOTARY FEE
30.90
41.9?
31.45
8.10
46471.54
52.00
60.00
460.00
792.60
37.50
288.00
558.18
434.65
210.58
69.50
34.94
50.00
2326.84
123.64
60.11
3555.67
80.00
80.00
543.16
184.25
1.00
319.50
32.00
1977.13
1441.20
175.50
64.02
59.19
335.10
135.26
165.00
60.00
31.00
10.37
70.00
83.97
140.75
241.93
339.72
75.72
45.00
1210.00
35.73
248.84
357.04
190.15
2857.25
5.00
t 1290
153
17920 HENNEPIN CO CHIEFS OF POLICE
17921 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
17 9 2 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
lk 3 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CNETERS
17924 D C HEY CO INC
17925 HONEYWELL
17926 HONEYWELL INC •
17927 HOPKINS PARTS CO
17928 HYDROTEX INC
17929 IMPERIAL INC
17930 INGMAN LABORATORIES INC
17931 INGRAM EXCAVATING
17932 IAA°
17933 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
17934 INT'L SOCIETY OF FIRE SERVICE INS
17935 GARY ISAACS
17936 J & R RADIATOR CORP
17937 JAK OFFICE PRODUCTS CO
17938 WAYNE JOHNSON
17939 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
17940 TOM KEEFE
17941 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
17942 KROY INC
17943 RON KRUEGER & ASSOCIATES INC
17944 GUST LAGERQUIST & SONS INC
17945 ROBERT LAMBERT
17946 LANCE
17" LYMAN LUMBER CO
17. MARKS EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO
17949 MENARDS
17950 RANDY MASON
17951 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC
17952 MCI CELLCOM
17953 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
17954 MEMA TREASURER
17955 MERIT/JULIAN GRAPHICS
17956 METRO FUME COMM INC
17957 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM
17958 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
17959 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
17960 MILLER/DAVIS CO
17961 MN ASSOC OF CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTO
17962 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC
17963 MN DEPT OF P/S
17964 MINNESOTA REC & PARK ASSOC
17965 MINNESOTA REG & PARK ASSOC
17966 MINNESOTA DEC & PARK ASSN
17967 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
17968 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER
17969 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
17970 MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS INC
17971 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO
17 R E. MOONEY & ASSOCIATES INC
GREG MUELLER
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT
OCT & NOV 84 BOOKING FEE
APRIL-OCT 84 RADIO REPAIR & PARTS
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DEC 84-FEB 85-ALARM SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE
OCT-DEC 84 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEP
EQUIPMENT PARTS-PARK MAINTENANCE
GREASE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PIPE FITTINGS/HEX NUTS-WATER DEPT
TESTS-WATER DEPT
SERVICE-STARING LAKE PARK
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
1985 DUES-FIRE DEPT
BASKETBALL OFFICAILS-FEES PD
HEATER CORE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
INSTALL SHELVING - P/S BLDG
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
VESTS/SCOREBOOKS-ATHLETIC CO-ORDINATOR
KROY TAPE HOLDERS-POLICE DEPT
SET 3 PROPERTY CORNERS -HWY 101
TEST-WATER DEPT
JANUARY 85 EXPENSES
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
LUMBER-STREET DEPT
HEADLIGHTS-FIRE DEPT
REMODEL COUNCIL CHAMBERS-PLANNING DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
TOWING SERVICE
MOBILE RADIO PHONE-POLICE DEPT
OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1985 DUES-POLICE DEPT
FORMS-BLDG DEPT
JANUARY 85 PAGER RENTAL
JANUARY 85 SEWER SERVICE
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR
WINTER MIX-STREET DEPT
BALLOT PAGES-ELECTION
1985 DUES-POLICE DEPT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
CRT RENTAL-POLICE DEPT
BROOMBALL REGISTRATIONS/FEES PAID
1985 DUES-COMMUNITY SERVICES
1985 DUES-ATHLETIC CO-ORDINATOR
1985 DUES-FIRE DEPT
1985 BOAT LICENSE-PARK MAINT
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
ADS-LIQUOR STORES
GRILL-STARING LAKE/BEARINGS-LAKE EDEN
PAINT-WATER DEPT
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
45.00
701.10
381.05
120.00
161.43
325.25
3214.00
40.80
921.98
99.42
34.00
484.50
15.00
82.70
40.00
150.00
36.02
772.62
698.60
109.11
187.50
81.43
165.22
255.00
216.00
165.00
167.31
118.46
26.28
635.00
142.50
50.00
198.81
46.80
25.00
329.65
77.72
93146.96
779.90
85.55
265.27
3.00
27.08
40.00
140.00
115.00
70.00
90.00
20.00
19.50
73.50
290.27
294.50
50.00
10683079
6 14
17974
17975
17976
17n77
8
17979
17980
17981
17982
17983
17984
17985
17988
17987
17988
17989
17990
17991
17992
17993
17994
17995
17996
17997
17998
17999
18000
18001
IF"?
IL 3
18004
18005
18006
18007
18008
18009
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION
NCR CORPORATION
NEAL REMODELERS
DUANE NIELSEN
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
NORWEST BANK MIVNEAPOLIS NA
NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO
STEVE OLSTAD
OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
THE PRESERVE OF EDEN PRAIRIE INC
CHARLES J PAPPAS
PNEUMATIC CONTROLS INC
POMMER MFG CO INC
PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
Q R S CORPORATION
FRED RAZAVI
REEF INDUSTRIES INC
RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA
RIDGE DOOR SALES CO OF MN INC
KAREN RINTA
ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO
ROGERS CALBESYSTEMS
ROBERTS HAMILTON CO
ROGERS WELL DRILLING
KURT SANDNESS
ERIC SAUGEN
SAVOIE SUPPLY COMPANY INC
HARVEY H SHMIDT
LARRY SCHWARTZ
SUSAN M SELSETH
SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM INC
SHAKOPEE FORD INC
18010 STEVEN R SINELL
18011 W E NEAL SLATE CO
18012 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
18013 SNAP PRINT-WEST
18014 SNYDERS DRUG STORES INC
18015 ROBERT D SORENSEN
18016 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES CEN
18017 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
18018 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
18019 SPECIALTY SCREENING
18020 ST PAUL BOOK 8 STATIONERY CO
15021 STANDARD SPRING COMPANY
18022 DON STREICHER GUNS
18023 STS CONSULTANTS LTD
18024 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
IS TENNESSEE CHEMICAL CO
1985 DUES
CASH REGISTER-COMMUNITY CENTER
HOUSING REHALIBITATION GRANT
REPAIR DRY FEEDER-WATER DEPT
SERVICE
TAPE RECORDER-POLICE DEPT
SERVICE
SERVICE
MILEAGE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TAXES
MILEAGE
OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER
TROPHIES-TABLE TENNIS/FEES PD
ELECTRICAL SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER
3 SNOWBLOWERS-PUBLIC SAFETY
FORMS-PLANNING/COMMUNITY CENTER
TAPE RECORDER/PLANNING DEPT
SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
ROPE-POLICE DEPT
CASH REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR STORE
ROLLERS-P/S BLDG
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-STREET DEPT
SERVICE-LINDEN DRIVE
LAB SUPPLIES
PIPE - PARK MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PO
CHEMICALS - P/W BLDG
INSTALL SECURITY WALL IN P/S GARAGE
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
SERVICE - CITY HALL
-MUFFLER & TAIL PIPE/WHEEL COVERS/KEYS/
BRAKE LEVER/HEADL1GHT SWITCH/BODY REPAIRS
JANUARY 85 EXPENSES
PANELS-PLANNING DEPT
SMALL TOOLS-STREET GARAGE
FORMS-LIQUOR STORE
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
PAINTING-P/S BLDG
2ND HALF OF 84 CONTRIBUTION
NOVEMBER 84 ADS - LIQUOR STORE
NOVEMBER 84 LEGAL ADS & HAPPENINGS
PLAQUE - POLICE
COMPUTER TABLE- BLDG DEPT
REPAIR CAR SEATS-WATER DEPT
SHOTGUN LOCK
SERVICE - PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
-FILTER/CABLE/BRAKE CYLINDERS/WIPER
SWITCH/WASHER PUMP/RUSTPROOFING
FERRI FLOC-WATER DEPT
6895.0(
599.W
7405.00
211.2.$
4.53
628.00
117.45
2258.76
5.71;
15.00
962.10
48.75
52.20
117.00
921.25
2027.42
238.44
329.00
14997.50
100.00
74.58
49.18
7.20
40.00
1440.00
1003.98
38.65
20.00
42.00
100.00
286.25
340.00
187.50
150.00
2160.30
2806.30
171.50
681.00
76.45
21.80
20.35
300.00
2675.00
828.04
1484.20
42.00
193.57
466.10
75.68
583.70
503.74
4516.14
5931862
18026 TRACY OIL CO INC
18027 TRUCK & BUS GROUP
18028 TWIN CITY STRIPING
18P 9 9 TWIN CITY TESTING INC
1E, BARNEY UHLIG
180J1 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
18032 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
18033 VIKING LABORATORIES INC
18034 WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA INC
18035 WATER PRODUCTS CO
18036 WAYZATA AUTO SERVICE INC
18037 SANDRA F WERTS
18038 WEST WELD
18039 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC
18040 ADAM WIETHOFF
18041 JOE WIETHOFF
18042 WINE SPECTATOR
18043 WINGFIELD PERFORMANCE ENG
18044 XEROX CORP
18045 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
18046 ZIEGLER INC
18047 STATE OF MINNESOTA
18048 NORMAR
18049 FLOYD SECURITY
18050 EARL & HELEN MORE
18Q," INTL SOC OF ARBORICULTURE
18k AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
18053 PETTY CASH
18054 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
18055 MET CENTER
8265722
UNLEADED GAS-STREET DEPT
8160.00 1985 TRUCK - BLDG DEPT
7076.44
1984 ROAD STRIPING - STREET DEPT
3500.00 WATER LEAKAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER
325.88 REFUND DOG LICENSE
4.00 BOOTH FOR SUMMER RECRUITMENT-COMMUNITY SER
12.00 SCREWS/RINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
194.08 CHLORINE-COMMUNITY CENTER
833.59 SIGNS - WATER DEPT
16.90 -GASKETS/REMOTES/GENERATOR/WASHERS/CAP SCR
22214.53
-SCREWS/BOLTS/ONE 3 INCH METER $1244.50/ONE
-FOUR INCH METER $2028.50/252 5/8 INCH METERS
$11312.28/83 REGULATORS $2407.00
PLOW GUIDES/PINS/BOLTS-EQUIPMENT MAINT
204.60
MILEAGE
42.88 WELDING RODS & ALLOY-STREET DEPT
173.61
WASHERS/GASKETS/RINGS-COMMUNITY CENTER
17.04
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
56.00
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD
212.50
SUBSCRIPTION-LIQUOR STORE
60.00
REPAIR TRANSMISSION-WATER DEPT
57.00
SERVICE
686.50
1ST AID SUPPLIES-STREET DEPT
28.00
REPAIR GRADER/GASKETS/RINGS
7680.18
REFUND-IDR DEPOSIT
5316.67
REFUND-IOR DEPOSIT
333.33
1ST QTR 85 ALARM SYSTEM-LIQUOR STORE
306.00
LAND PURCHASED
24650.00
1985 DUES-FORESTRY DEPT
65.00
SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT
61.99
POSTAGE-CITY HALL
15.50
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT
95.00
TICKETS/FEES PAID
258.00
$354454.31
January 8, 1985
CASH DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND NUMBER
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
36 P/S & P/W BOND FUND
44 UTILITY DEBT FUND
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
86 PARK PROG-CONTRIBUTIONS
87 CDBG FUND
90 TAX INCREMENT FUND
91 T I F DEBT FUND
$354454.31
111143.03
9103.36
6456.32
6011.29
772.50
2096.37
10.92
37281.18
44908.80
93190.91
5650.00
1210.00
7405.00
29108.10
106.53
tS 1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-09
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL MEETING
DATES, TIME AND PLACE FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
COUNCIL MEMBERS IN 1985 AND APPOINTING AN ACTING MAYOR
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, that they meet on the first and third Tuesdays of each month
at 7:30 p.m. to be adjourned by 11:30 p.m., unless waived by unanimous
vote of members present, in the Eden Prairie School Administration
Building, 8100 School Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Roberts Rules of
Order will prevail.
BE IT RESOLVED, that is hereby appointed to be the acting Mayor in the absence of the Mayor.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Priarie this 8th
day of January, 1985.
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk
I 6Z
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
• Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Community Services14 --'
December 26, 1984
Tax Forfeited Lands
Enclosed is a classification list of non conservation land located in the City
of Eden Prairie. These parcels forfeited to the State of Minnesota for non pay-
ment of real estate taxes.
As provided in Minnesota Statute 282, the Hennepin County Department of Property
Taxation requests the City Council to approve these parcels for either public
sale or for private sale to adjacent owners, if the parcels are unable to be
improved because of non compliance with local ordinances. The Council may also
acquire parcels for public uses by resolutions stating the use to made of the
parcels.
City staff has reviewed these parcels and provide the following information on
each parcel:
PARCEL 04-116-22-34-0048 - Tamarac Woods, Outlot A
This is a 75' by 102 outlot on the northwest corner of Edgewood
Court and Edenvale Blvd. The northern boundary of this parcel
is part of the Edenvale Park and Open Space System. The eastern
boundary is Edenvale Blvd. The southern boundary is Edgewood
Court and the western boundary is a private lot. The Edenvale
Blvd. bicycle trail runs through the middle of this outlot. This
outlot was previously owned by a partnership that had agreed to
donate this parcel to the City for tail purposes as a part of
a land trade agreement. This is not a buildable lot. It was
valued by the County at $2,500. The taxes that were due when it
forfeited the State of Minnesota totalled $167.40. City staff
recommend this parcel be acquired for bike trail purposes at this
time.
PARCEL 10-116-22-33-0019 - Edenvale Recreation Center 2nd, Outlot A
This lot is a triangular shaped lot located approximately 700' east
of Mitchell Road within the Purgatory Creek floodplain. There are
no special assessments on this property. The County had this parcel
valued at $600 and there were $97.99 worth of taxes due on the property
when it forfeited to the State of Minnesota. As the City has been
acquiring the majority of the floodplain along Purgatory Creek, either
through tax forfeited properties or through donations, City staff would
recommend the City acquire Out lot A for park and open space purposes
in an effort to continue the preservation of the floodplain along
this creek.
City staff recommend that the Council approve the resolution requesting the
County allow the City to acquire these parcels for public use as stated in
this memorandum.
BL:md
1 60
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 8S-11
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 1HE ACQUISITION OF TAX FORFEITED LANDS FOR PUBLIC PARK
AND TRAIL PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has received from the County of Hennepin
a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of
Minnesota for non-payment of real estate taxes, which said list has been designated
as Exhibit A attached hereto, and
WHEREAS, provided in the Minnesota Statutes 282, the City Council is asked to
approve the public sale of these parcels or to indicate which parcels the City
wishes to acquire for public use, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain title to PIN 04-116-22-34-0048 and PIN
10-116-22-33-0019 for public park purposes,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie
does request the Board of Hennepin County approve the acquisition of these parcels
by the City of Eden Prairie.
• ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 8th day of
January, 1985.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST
John D. Franc, City Clerk SEAL
161
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION
A606 Government Center
HENN [PIN
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0066
December 18 1984
City of Eden Prairie
John D. Frane. Clerk
8950 Eden Prairie itqad
. Eden Prairie Mn. 55344
Enclosed is a classification list of non-conservation land located in your
municipality. The described parcels forfejted to the State of Minnesota
for non-payment of property taxes.
As provided in Minnesota Statutes 282, we ask that you approve these parcels
for public auction; auction to adjacent owners; or request a conveyance to
your municipality for public use.
We need a certified copy of the city resolution authorizing any action you
wish to take. If you are requesting a parcel be conveyed to you, we also
need "Application By A Governmental Subdivision For Conveyance Of Tax
Forfeited Land" completed and sent in.
Only new special assessments which were levied after the forfeiture need be
certified to us. We will automatically pick up the remaining balance of any
assessment levied to us previously.
Please be advised that if the Council fails to respond within 90 days of the
date of this letter, the sale will be deemed to be approved.
If you have any questions, you may contact our Forfeited Land Unit at 348-3734
or myself at 348-5160.
Sincerely,
Vernon T. Hoppe
Director of Property Taxation
By
Dennis Morris
Delinquent Tax P. Forfeited Land Section Supervisor
VTH:DM:ed
Enclosure 1 0, HENNEPIN COUN1Y
on equal opportunity employer
Jirum OWNER
• PRAIRIE
lo Address
Universal Land Corporation
No Address
Equitable Life. Assur Soc
v-G,“
"
BLDG VALUE
o.1-.
To'
04-116-22 34 0048
•
10-116-22 33 0019
TOTAL
MARKET VALUE
600
pin
C'/,
LGO
6,-1 )
JN: R761 PROPERTY DATA SYSTEM
TAXPAYER !MOWRY TRANSACTION
RTY 1.0.
RG -(7(7 SUE X - ''eEAR
16 22 34 0048 . 84
dNER It 1 : STATE LAND DEPT.
JWNER # 2
PERCENT OWNER:
ADDRESS : 00000
APT.: 7IP: 55344 MID-YEAR
ZONING : PROP. TYPE: K YEAR RUILT: • LOT AREA: ACRES: .00
SCH.DST: 272 WSHD: 4 OR/OS: SUBRECS: 1 FRONT: DEPTH:
MKT-LAND MKT-BLDG MKT-MACH MKT-TOT TOT. ASS. H.S.CD
CURRENT YEAR
PREVIOUS YEAR:
LEGAL DESCR. : ==== NO LOT AND RLOCK GIVEN ====
TAMARAC WOODS
OUTLAY!' A
TRANSACTION ID: R768
PROPERTY I.D.
SN p RG 00 SUFX
04-„6-22 34 0048
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH-SUMMARY
TODAYS DATE: 12/21/84 ---SPECIAL FLAGS--
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-S-10
.= =_===
S.A.# ASSESSMENT DESCR. YR YRS RATE
*44,4** SUMMARY OF ACTIVE
*4 ,1*44 THIS YEAR'S 10T P8I
TOTAL ANN.PRIN.
.00
.00
PAYOFF COMMENT
.00
,ur txunc11 fails to respond within 90 days of the unis letter, the sale will be deemed to be approved.
If you have any questions, you may contact our Forfeited Land Unit at 348-3734 or myself at 348-5160.
Sincerely,
Vernon T. Hoppe
Director of Property Taxation
BY Aet,--.3.
Dennis Morris
Del inquent Tax & forfeited Land Section Supervisor
VTH:DM:ed
Enclosure
I GLI HENNEPIN COUNTY
I
;
0
c5v-VS .$
"to 'n • \\ "'
\` 6;$ •
T5 1 ,
NV_
' 1 t
•
4- I `---‹ /s! \
zon 4: ife5. 5
_
AEA(' AGE
—I _SW . 1/4 _1_ SC 1/4
TS11,' _1:NE-1 . 57 1:- .1,1Y411-.5W 1 -NEL SE7
3960 30581 Zi!) ! 3990 '4CO:
1 ....M.W1garalroursopai4Ir4a•
1 (6
01::::44ClICN: R761 PPOPERTv BATA SYSTEM
TAXPAYER INOUIPY TRANSACTION
.D.
)0 SUFX YEAR
33 0019 54
A 1 : STATE LAND DEPT.
*2 :
.ESS : 00000
APT.: 7IP:
JNINS : PROP. TYPE: VL
SCH.DST: 272 WSHD: A
PERCENT OWNER:
5534h MID—YEAR :
YEAR BUILT: LOT AREA:
ACRES: .00 1R/OS: SUBRECS: 1 FRONT:
DEPTH:
MKT—LAND MKT—RLDG MKT—MACH MKT—TOT TOT. ASS. H.S.CD CURRENT YEAR :
LEGAL DESCR. ==== NO LOT AND BLOCK GIVEN ====
EDENVALE RECREATION CENTER 2ND
DUTLOT A
I 0015 NO COMMENTS FOR THIS PARCEL
TRANSACTION ID: R766 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY
PROPERTY F.D. TODAYS DATE: 12/21/84 --SPECIAL FLAGS-- SN TWP RG 00 SUFX
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 10-116-22 33 0019
S.A # ASSESSMENT DESCR. YR YRS RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF COMMENT
****** SUMMARY OF ACTIVE
. 0 0 .00 ****** THIS YEAR'S TOT PO
. 00
ve,..UU41j.
Please be advised that if the Council fails to respond wit
h
i
n
9
0
d
a
y
s
o
f
t
h
e
date of this letter, the sale will be deemed to be approved
.
If you have any questions, you may contact our Forfeited La
n
d
U
n
i
t
a
t
3
4
8
-
3
7
3
4
or myself at 348-5160.
Sincerely,
Vernon T. Hoppe
Director of Property Taxation
By
Dennis Morris
Delinquent Tax & Forfeited Land Section Supervisor
VTM:DM:ed
Enclosure
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on equal ODOOttunnv emninuar
2
,
'
\.. r 12::'
•,..- - 4 2 .3 i;:,•,4 SI 31
.•r .._,.
. _..i .,... ._ ..
.4,
(71
z;
IL. •;•(,)
„3') r __ • • ..: :-- - .. _ . .,„, ji;
.,•7 EDENVALE t.:REC RE ATI -ON :L.:)•:.
.s , P.e .•.-;-1 .,,, 2 ''...i'-'? ,,,4 )
..4 :...,,, CENTER ADD. ..,.. , 1 • -
3:7; 7$' V•11).
• I c L t 'St n 3 •
• I'
18
S TA T H - r
‘,0
-
.;
.1 0
MUMODANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Bob Lambert, Director of Community
January 3,3, 1985
Bryant Lake Regional Park CIP
At the January 8th meeting, Greg Mack, Southern Division Manager for the Hennepin
County Park Reserve District, will present a summary of the proposed Phase I develop-
ment for Bryant Lake Regional Park. The project is included in the Metropolitan
Council's fiscal year 1986 recommendation to the State Legislature for capital
funding.
The Park Reserve District is requesting support from the City of Eden Prairie for
the Bryant Lake project. The $710,000 Phase I includes $600,000 for relocating the
entry road to the park, construction of parking lots, relocation and improvement of
the boat launch, expansion of the beach area and redevelopment of the lake front
and group reservation picnic areas. This development also includes $110,000 toward
improvement of Rowland Road.
Earlier this year, the City of Eden Prairie authorized a feasibility study for
improving Rowland Road from Shady Oak Road, north to Minnetonka. The feasibility
study, that should be completed by RCM in January, will have estimated costs for
two alternatives; one would provide costs for upgrading to a rural section, the
other would include curb and gutter.
The main problem with Rowland Road, other than the extremely bad condition of the
surface, is the vertical and horizontal alignment of the road, as it does not pro-
vide adequate drainage.
Assuming their report will be completed in January and presented to the City Council,
the Council would most likely call for a public hearing in February.
The Community Services Department recommends the City Council strongly support the
Phase I development of Bryant Lake Regional Park. The Council has long recogni:ed the
the problem with the existing access and entrance road, and the limited parking
facilities at that park. As a part of the transfer of Bryant Lake Park to the Henn-
epin County Park Reserve District, the City requested that the County commit to
developing that park as soon as possible.
lhe question regarding upgrading of Rowland Road will also have to be answered early
in 1985. The extent of the upgrading necessary will, I'm sure, become more evident
with the traffic studies that should accompany the feasibility study.
BL:md
/6 1
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Dec. 17, 1984
-2-
Kingrey then asked if these requests are taken on a first come,
first served basis. Lambert said that they are.
MOTION: A motion was made by Schwartz to approve the request by
Rosemount for intramural broomball to be held at the Round Lake
Hockey rink. Baker seconded the motion and it carried 5-0.
B. Request from HCPRD to Approve CIP for Bryant Lake Park
Refer to memo dated December 11, 1984 from Bob Lambert, Director of
Community Services.
Lambert introduced Greg Mack, Southern Division Manager for the
Hennepin County Park Reserve District who was at the meeting to present
a summary of the proposed Phase I development for Bryant Lake Park.
Mack stated that Phase I development will cost approximately $710,000
and includes relocating the entry road to the park, construction of
parking lots, relocation and improvement of the boat launch, expansion
of the beach area and redevelopment of the lake front and group
reservation picnic areas. It also includes $110,000 toward the
Improvement of Rowland Road. Rowland Road would then be used as an
access road to the park. These improvements are to be a joint effort
between the Park Reserve District and Hennepin County.
Mack showed a map of the proposed improvements. Lambert asked how the
$710,000 figure was arrived at. Mack said this figure is based on
similar projects and is more or less a basic cost. Lambert asked if
the road improvements would be done this summer. Mack said no, but
perhaps in July of 1986 if the legislature chooses to sell the bonds.
Kingrey asked if park use would be affected by the construction of the
Crosstown. Mack said it would not be.
Mack mentioned other projects the Park Reserve District is working on,
of which 22% of the total package is included in the capital
improvement program. These include the expansion of the Medicine Lake
development which will cost approximately $800,000; the completion of
the district shop at French Park and the development of the Elm Creek
campgrounds. They are also taking bids on the remodeling of their
office. This would be done jn order to accommodate all support staff
in one building.
Kingrey asked if the Park Reserve District is working with the City of
Eden Prairie on the Rowland Road improvements.
n o
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Dec. 17, 1984
-3-
Lambert said that a feasibility study should be completed in January
and presented to the City Council who would most likely call for a
public hearing in February. He added that Rowland Road is in poor
condition and there have been complaints from several nearby residents.
Cook said that he feels actual costs would not be known until the
feasibility study is completed.
Jessen suggested the commission consider recommending support of the
capital improvement project for the park and delay a decision on the road
alignment until the feasibility report is finished.
MOTION: A motion was made by Cook to support the Bryant Lake Park
capital improvement program. Schwartz seconded the motion and it
carried 4-0. Jessen abstained.