The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 11/05/1991FINANCE DIRECTOR JOHN FRANE AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1991 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 8:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Ju'lie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MINUTES A. City Council Notes from Medina held October 14 1991 B. City Council Minutes from Meetiqg held Tuesday. October 15, 1991 C. City Council Minutes from Meetina held Tuesday. October 22, 1991 TH. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License Lis( B. Recommendation on Selection of Architect for Design Services for Community Center Addition C. Request for 24-Month Extension to Schwab Developer's Agreement (dba R. G. Read Development) D. Approval of Final Plat of Bluffs East 11th Addition (located north of Bluff Road and east of County Road 18) Resolution No. 91-241 Page 2282 Page 2283 Page 2295 Page 2305 Page 2306 Page 2309 Page 2311 City Council Agenda November 5, 1991 Page Two Page 2313 Page 2315 Page 2317 Page 2318 E. Approve Change Order No 1 for Staring Lane and Sunrise Circle Improvements. LC. 52-20 & IC. 52-205 F. Approve Change Order No. 3 for Mitchell Road and Sandy J'ointe Addition Improvements. I.C. 52-156 & I.C. 52-201 G. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Eden Hills Improvements for Bluffs East 11th Addition. LC. 52-212 H. Approve Addendum to Azreement PW 19-15-90 with Hennepin County and City of MinnetonluLfor EAW on Townline Road, LC. 52-103 I. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT by the City of Eden Prairie. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-158, Adopting the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to add 317 ± acres into the Eden Prairie MUSA line. (Resolution No. 91-158 - Guide Plan Amendment) J. Resolution Establishing Procedures Relating to Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Retulations Under the Internal Revenue Code (Resolution No. 91-244) K. 1992 Budget - Voting Machines IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (Resolution No. 91-240A) Continued from October 22, 1991 B. EDEN PRAIRIE AUTO CENTER by Accent Real Estate, Ltd. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-243, Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review on 16.2 acres with waivers; Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 16.2 acres; and Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres for development of a 158,800 square foot automobile dealership to be known as Eden Prairie Auto Center. Location: Southeast corner of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive. (Resolution No. 91-243 - PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 30-91 - Zoning District Amendment) Page 2322 Page 2323 Page 2324 Page 2325 Page 2346 City Council Agenda November 5, 1991 Page Three Page 2359 C. C CODE AMENDMENT MUD CONCEPT AREA billkaMEMD_FLILAMM by City of Eden Prairie. Request to amend City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivisions 6 and 11 relating to PUD Concept Area minimum of 15 acres and Findings Required respectively. (Ordinance No. 24-91 - PUD Concept) V. PAYMENT VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS. REOUFSTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request to Consider Purchase of The Parcels West of Eden Roa4 Page 2364 Page 2376 B. Petition for the Closure of the Heritage Road/Fliehway Page 2377 Intersection VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES AEID_MMM X. REPORTS FIC A. Reports of CouncilmemberS B. Report of City Manager 1. Proposed 1992 Budgets for Enterprise Activities (continued from October 15, 1991) XI. 0Th ER BUSINESS Page 2378 XII. ADJOURNMENT MEETING NOTES CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL October 14, 1991 The City Council met with its staff for a seminar entitled, "Challenges of Governing and Managing a City." The seminar was held at The Meeting Point, University of Saint Thomas, 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Chaska, Minnesota. The seminar began at 9:00 a.m., and all Councilmembers were present. Mr. Michael Norman presented "Challenges of Change", a discussion about the dynamics of transitions. The speaker for the rest of the seminar was Mr. John Drozdal. He related several concepts; had the attendees work in small groups to identify several of the strengths, threats, and opportunities facing the City; and had them participate in an exercise about how to implement plans. The overall purpose of the seminar centered on providing concepts and techniques for the Council and its staff to enhance their effectiveness. Councilmembers agreed that these seminars should be conducted on a fairly regular schedule. The seminar ended at 4:35 p.m. CUO:bein 227.2- EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES TIME: 7:30 PM Tuesday, October 15, 1991 LOCATION: City Hall Council Chambers COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager, Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick PLEDGE or ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL All Councilmembers present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the agenda. Jullie requested the addition of Item X.B.2. Report of the City Manager, Appointments to South Hennepin Regional Planning Board; and X.B.3. Date for the next Council Workshop; and XI.A. Public Improvements for Bluffs East 11th Addition. Harris requested the addition of two items under X.A. Report of Councilmembers: (1) Major Center Area Land Acquisition; (2) Flying Cloud Airport Expansion. Jessen requested the addition of (3) Bryant Lake Park Roadway. Agenda approved as amended 5-0. II. MINUTES A. Joint City Council/School Board meeting held Tuesday. September 17. 1991. MOTION Harris moved, second by Anderson, to approve the Joint City Council/School Board meeting minutes held Tuesday, September 17, 1991. Motion approved 5-0. Eden Prairie 2 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved B. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday. September 17. 1991 MOTION Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, September 17, 1991. Jessen requested that that on Page 1, Item ILA. Special City Council meeting held Tuesday, August 27, 1991, the second paragraph be corrected to read, "Jessen said that on page 3 of the Minutes, the first paragraph, Columbine Road should be changed to Regional Center Drive." Harris requested the following addition to Page 11, the last sentence of the second paragraph: "and the issues raised by residents in their presentation through Council deliberations." She also noted that in the fifth paragraph, the third line should read "part of the pilots but he believed that it was necessary to find a..." Motion to approve the Minutes as amended approved 5-0. C. Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday. October 1. 1991 MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held Tuesday, October 1, 1991. Anderson requested a correction to Page 11, Item X.D.2. Revisions to Riley Lake Park Plan. He requested the addition of two items: (K) Connections to the Railroad Trail. (L) A rest area on the City-owned land on the south shore of Riley Lake. Motion to approve the Minutes as amended approved 5-0. D. Notes of Eden Prairie Foundation Forum held Tuesday, October 8. 1991 MOTION Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Notes of the Eden Prairie Foundation Forum held Tuesday, October 8, 1991. Motion approved 4-0-1 with Pidcock abstaining. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST Eden Prairie 3 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved B. PRAIRIE COURT AMENDMENT by L. A. Donnay. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-229, denial of 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 27-91, Zoning District Amendment within the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District on 3.7 acres for the addition of a gas pump and canopy facility to the Prairie Court Shopping Center. Location: northeast corner of Wagner Way and County Road #4. (Resolution No. 91-229 - Denying 2nd Reading) C. 1-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION/COMSIS CONTRACT by City of Eden Prairie. Request for approval of contract between 1-494 Corridor Commission and COMSIS for consultant services. D. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT OF HAWK HIGH RIDGE (located west of Bennett Place and south of Pioneer Trail) (Resolution No. 91-232) E. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT OF BLUESTEM RIDGE 2ND ADDITION (located adjacent to Hawk High Ridge) (Resolution No. 91-233) F. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT OF BLUFFS WEST 10TH (located north of Bluestem Lane and east of Purgatory Creek) (Resolution No. 91-234) G. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT FOR HAWK HIGH RIDGE. I.C. 52-223. AND I.C. 52-199 H. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR EDEN HILLS. I.C. 52-212 I. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR 1991 SEAL COAT. I.C. 52-228 J. RESOLUTION NO. 91-236 AUTHORIZING THE REMOVAL OF A HAZARDOUS BUILDING K. RESOLUTION NO 91-239, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91-24 - AUTHORIZING DISPOSITION OF TAX FORFEITED LANDS L. RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE AND AUTHORIZING CLEAN WATER PARTNERSHIP GRANT APPLICATION FOR PHASE I DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY OF CHAIN OF LAKES (Resolution No. 91-238) M. SET JANUARY 19, 1992 AS THE DATE FOR THE THIRD ANNUAL1_4ARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. EVENT - "CELEBRATING OUR DIVERSITY" MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Consent. Calendar. Pauly called Council attention to the amendment on Item III.B. and the revision in Paragraph A. Consent calendar approved as amended 5-0. 7) 1<7C Eden Prairie 4 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. BLUFFS EAST 11TH ADDITION by Hustad Development Corporation. Request for Planned Unit Development District Review within the overall Bluff Country PUD on 4.23 acres with waivers for average lot width; Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 on 2.43 acres and R1-13.5 on 1.8 acres; Adoption of Resolution No. 91-230, Preliminary Plat of 4.23 acres into 12 single family lots and road right-of-way to be known as Bluffs East 11th Addition, Resolution No. 91-235, Approving Plans and Specifications for Street and Utility Easements, I.C. 52-243. Location: North of Bluff Road, west of Falcons Way. (Ordinance No. 28-91-PUD-9-91 - Zoning District Change; Resolution No. 91-230 - Preliminary Plat, and Resolution No. 91-235 - Approving Plans and Specifications for Street and Utility Easements) Jullie said notice of the public hearing was mailed to property owners in the project area and published in the October 3, 1991 issue of Eden Prairie News. Wally Hustad, representing Hustad Development Corporation, described the project by the use of maps and drawings. The project consisted of 12 lots for single-family houses adjacent to the townhouse project which had been approved in 1990. He pointed out that some of the lots in the subdivision were greater than 9,500 square feet but less than the 13,500 square feet required by City Code for low-density residential use. Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the project at its September 9, 1991 meeting and recommended unanimous approval of the request for preliminary platting and rezoning, subject to staff recommendations as follows: (1) Prior to final plat approval the proponent shall (a) provide detailed storm water runoff, erosion control and utility plans for review by the City Engineer; (b) Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. (2) Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate cash park fee. Anderson asked what the cost of the houses would be on the 9,500 square-foot lots. flustad said the builder anticipated the selling price would be $260,000, similar to the townhouses on the adjacent land. Anderson asked Enger what the intent of the 9.5 lot had been. Enger said the original intent was to provide a small lot for a smaller, less expensive house. Anderson said he was concerned that the intent of the 9.5 lot size was not being met by building $260,000 houses on them. Eden Prairie 5 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved Hustad said that in this case the 9.5 lot size was an attempt to make a transition between the townhouses and the single-family houses with larger lots. He added that the single-family properties would be maintained by a homeowners association in the same manner that the townhouses were being maintained. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION Pidcock moved to close the public hearing and approve first reading of C. Jinan^e 28-91 PUD-9-91 for Zoning District Change. Seconded by Jessen. Motion approved 5-0. MOTION Pidcock moved to adopt Resolution No. 91-230 approving the preliminary plat and direct staff to prepare a development agreement incorporating Commission and staff recommendations; adopt Resolution No. 91-235 to prepare plans and specifications for street and utility improvements within the Bluffs East 11th Addition. Anderson said that he believed Council should always question if the original intent of the 9.5 lot size was being met. Jessen asked if all the improvements would be assessed to the property involved regardless of the $15,000 cap on assessments. Dietz said that this was true as there were no existing homesteads in the subdivision. Motion approved 5-0. B. ISSUANCE OF $6.3200.000 IN HOUSING FINANCE BONDS FOR laNDsLon APARTMENTS (Resolution No. 91-237) Jullie said notice for the public hearing had been properly published. Ile said that a buyer had been found for these apartment buildings who would be willing to retain them as Section 8 government-subsidized housing. The prospective new owner had determined that improvements were necessary in the complex and was willing to invest $165,000 in the improvements. Enger introduced Dick Brustad and Linda Donaldson of Community Housing Development Corporation, the prospective new owner of the Windslope Apartments. He explained that the company planned to sell bonds to finance the purchase of the apartments and expected the interest rate to be somewhat less than 8%. He said the plan was to purchase the property from the present owners, pay the fees associated with the transaction, establish some new reserves for the property, and make needed improvements in the complex. .."!,)71/ 7n 0,11 Eden Prairie 6 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved Brustad explained that Community Housing Development Corporation was established specifically for the purpose of assisting in Section 8 projects. The present owner had expressed an interest in converting the complex to market-rate housing. He said that the public purpose of Community Housing Development Corporation was to assure affordable housing by using the full term of the Section 8 contract for 27 years. Enger said Briar Hill and Windslope Apartments were the only family housing of this type in the community. Anderson suggested that this situation should be investigated and more housing of this type considered for the future. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION Harris moved to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution No. 91-237 authorizing the issuance of $6,320,000 in Housing Finance Bonds for Windslope Apartments. Motion approved 5-0. C. TRANSFER CDBG FUNDS by City of Eden Prairie. Adoption of Resolution 91-232, Approve transfer of CDBG funds from Adaptive Recreation program to the Housing Rehabilitation Program. (Resolution No. 91-231 - Transfer of funds) Jullie explained that a public hearing was required whenever there was a transfer of CDBG funds. He said that $911.75 of these funds had been used for the Sign Language Interpreters Program for hearing-impaired individuals participating in adaptive recreation activities. Since there was a remaining balance of $4,128.25, it was recommended that $3,728.25 of this amount be transferred to the Housing Rehabilitation Program. It was anticipated that only $400 more would be needed for the Sign Language Program for the remainder of 1991. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION Harris moved to close the public hearing and adopt of Resolution No. 91-231 approving the transfer of $3,728.25 in CDBG Funds from Adaptive Recreation Program to the Housing Rehabilitation Program. Seconded by Jessen. Motion approved 5-0. Eden Prairie 7 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve payment of claims. Motion for payment of claims approved with Anderson, Harris, Pidcock, Jessen, and Tenpas all "AYE". VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS. & COMMITTEES IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Major Center Area Land Acquisition Harris said she had received a letter dated September 25, 1991 in regard to Major Center Area land acquisition, and she would like this item put on a future Council agenda. 2. Flying Cloud Airport Expansion Harris said that after reading and hearing the concerns of those residents who lived near Flying Cloud Airport, she would like Council strongly to consider a resolution opposing the airport expansion plans. Julie said the process had been put on hold until a decision was reached on the waiver requested by MAC on the 500-foot runway expansion. Tenpas believed it was important for the community to know that Council was opposed to the expansion of the airport. However, he believed it would be a good decision to wait until MAC had received an answer on its request for the waiver. Anderson asked Pauly what would be an appropriate procedure in this matter. Pauly said that an opinion from the Attorney General had been requested as to the City's authority with respect to land use decisions and zoning. He suggested a formal resolution be deferred until it was known whether or not the City had rezoning authority in this case. ZZ9 Eden Prairie 8 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved 3. Bryant Lake Park Roadway Jessen said he had received a phone call from Sandra Landucci telling him that several Hennepin Parks District representatives and City Engineer Alan Gray had responded to her request for a meeting about the problems with the entrance road, and that everyone had been very cooperative. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Proposed 1992 Budgets for Enterprise Activities Jullie called Council attention to the information in the Council packets. MOTION Pidcock moved to continue this item until November 5, 1991. Seconded by Jessen. Motion approved 5-0. 2. South Hennepin Regional Planning Board Jullie said that it was necessary to appoint two representatives to the South Hennepin Regional Planning Board by November 15, 1991. He suggested that Council refer this matter to the Human Rights and Services Commission. He said one Council member was also requested to serve on this Board. Jessen agreed to represent the Council on this Board, and Council agreed to request the Human Rights and Services Commission to appoint the other two members. 3. Date for the Next Council Workshop Jullie suggested November 12, 1991 as a date for this Workshop. Council agreed to begin the meeting at 4 PM on this date at. the Spring Hill Conference Center in Orono. C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 1. Revisions to Housing Rehabilitation Program (Continued from October 1, 1991) David Lindahl, Planner, explained the proposed revision as presented to the Human Rights and Services Commission as well as comments received from the Commission. The proposed changes were as follows: Repay the loans when the properties sell instead of letting the.: expire after ten years. o r\C• Eden Prairie 9 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved B. Five percent simple interest would be charged on the loans so that the City could recover more than the principal on the loans, making more funds available to help more people. C. It was agreed to keep the income levels at 85% of metropolitan median since the average client served to date had an income of $15,000. Jessen asked how many applications there had been for the program. Lindahl estimated 25 or 30 applications had been processed since 1985. He said most people who apply receive some funds and to date, demand had not exceeded the supply of money. However, he anticipated that this would change as the City's housing stock aged. He said that at the present time the City receives $75,000 in CDBG funds annually. MOTION Jessen moved approval of the Revisions to the Housing Rehabilitation Program as presented. Seconded by Harris. Motion approved 5-0. 2. Future Use of Recovered Scattered Site Housing Funds Lindahl said that the City had received $21,000 from the sale of a scattered-site housing property. He said that because of changes in the law, these funds could be used in any way the City determined was appropriate. The Human Rights and Services Commission had recommended that Council designate the funds for future rental housing programs. He pointed out that the present waiting list for Windslope and Briar Hill apartments, the two Section 8 buildings in the City, was seven to ten years. The Commission had examined ways to use the funds to help low- income families with rental housing. It had also considered assisting the most needy people on the waiting list for subsidized rental units by allowing them to live in market-rate units and providing money for a portion of the rent. He requested Council approval for staff to investigate further options and to designate the $21,000 for future rental housing programs. Anderson said he was concerned about the lack of low-income housing in community. Lindahl said there was no longer federal money available for low-income housing projects. Ile also said there were very few vehicles for the City to use as incentives to the private sector to build affordable housing. Anderson believed that costs of houses built on 111-9.5 size lots should be kept as low as possible as one step to remedy the problem of affordable housing in the City. 1 Eden Prairie 10 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved Harris expressed concern about the waiting list for Section 8 housing and asked if there were any programs available to help low-income people with rent. Lindahl said there were Section 8 certificates administered by the Metro BRA which were issued to allow people to live in market-rate buildings which had certain rent thresholds; however, the waiting list for the certificates was even longer than the waiting list for the Section 8 apartment buildings. Harris asked if there were sufficient apartment vacancies to enable the City to assist people in renting market- rate housing. Lindahl said there had been a 7-10% vacancy rate in rental housing and he believed some arrangement would be possible. Harris also noted that the lack of low-coat housing in the City had resulted in Eden Prairie employers having difficulty attracting and maintaining adequate labor forces. Pidcock said she supported giving aid as necessary. She asked if TIF moneys could be used for housing. Pauly said it was possible to create an TIF District for an apartment project as it had been done in the past. He also suggested investigating the possibility of using the present development district because there were more funds available. Council agreed that staff should pursue options that would address the problem of inadequate low-cost housing in the City. MOTION Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, that $21,000 received from the sale of the scattered-site housing property be designated for rental housing. Motion approved 5-0. D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Staring Lake Amphitheater - Phase 1 Barbara Penning Cross, Park Planner, explained the details of the project. She said the amphitheater would be built on the stage with a 10-foot overhang. However, this plan would cost more because of the large footings required to stabilize the building. Cost estimates for the original building had been $17,000, but the new plan would cost $48,000. She said that the Historical and Cultural Commission, the Performing Arts Committee, and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission had all agreed with the new concept. She requested Council approval to use the $17,000 to install some of the footings, electricity, and other basic needs for the building in Eden Prairie 11 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved 1991 so that the performing season would not have to be interrupted for this work in 1992. The rest of cost could either be put on the list of City needs, or funds could be requested from service groups or other interested persons. NOTION Anderson moved that the $17,000 be used as recommended for the Amphitheater structure in 1991. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0. 2. Request for Nature Trail for Forest Hills School Chris Erickson, a fourth grade teacher at Forest Hills School, explained the plans for this project which were to put a nature trail in the City-owned marsh area north of Forest Hills School for the students. He work would be done by students, parents, and other volunteers. Barbara Penning Cross said the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department would approve the location of the trail and the type of construction that would be used. She also said the City would approve of any additions to the trail such as signs or bridges. The City would follow through on any necessary Corps of Engineers or Watershed District permits. Chris Erickson was looking into available grants to finance the project. Anderson said he was enthusiastic about the project and if it went well, he would like to see more projects of this type. Jessen agreed, but said the City should investigate maintenance and liability costs. Harris also expressed concern that the costs could exceed the amount of the grants. However, she said she was in favor of the project. MOTION Jessen moved to approve the request for a Nature Trails for Forest Hills School pursuant to the report of the staff. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0. Z95 Eden Prairie 12 October 15, 1991 City Council Minutes Unapproved XI. OTHER BUSINESS A. Cul-De-Sac for Bluffs E. 11th Addition Dietz suggested that the cul-de-sac for Bluffs E. 11th Addition be Included in the public improvement contract for either to the Cedar Ridge Second Addition or the Eden Hills Subdivision project. He requested approval of a change order to one of these projects so that the cul-de-sac could be built in 1991. MOTION Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, that the cul-de-sac for Bluffs E. 11th Addition be included in the public improvement contract for either the Cedar Ridge Second Addition or the Eden Hills Subdivision project. Motion approved 5-0. XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to adjourn at 9:00 PM. Motion approved 5-0. z ia q UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, October 22, 1991 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Engineer Alan Gray, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL All members were present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added Item III.A. Information on Codes of Ethics for Councils and Commisions for Council Review. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 5-0. 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Proposed 1991 Special Assessments (Resolution No. 92-240) City Manager Jullie stated that notice of this public hearing was published in the Eden Prairie News and that copies were mailed to each individual property owner listed on the property rolls. Tenpas said the Council would limit review to those projects that property owners in the audience wished to discuss. Director of Public Works Dietz said they provided an assessment roll that conforms to the Special Assessments policy adopted about three years ago. He said the purpose of that policy is to try to provide some kind of fairness and equity of distribution as well as consistency from one project to another. He noted that there is some subsidy to homesteaded property provided by the maximum of $15,000 assessment to such property and the trunk sewer and water assessment of $520. City Council Meeting 2 October 22, 1991 Dietz also noted that the utility portion of the assessment will be excluded until 1997 or until connection. He said the excluded portion of the assessment is not being assessed this evening. Dietz reminded property owners that their objections to the assessment must be in writing and must be filed tonight in order to preserve the right to appeal. He said a written objection gives the property owner 30 days after the hearing closes to file a notice of appeal to District Court. 1. I.C. 52-156 -- Street and Utility Improvements on Mitchell Road There were no comments from the audience. 2. I C. 52-166 -- Sanitary _Sewer Watermain. Storm Sewer. Curb and Gutter. Sidewalks and Street Improvements on Summit Drive. Meadowv.le DrivP and Red Oak Drive Dietz said this project was done on a lot unit basis, and the final cost was about $1,000 per unit higher than the feasibility study cost. Dietz noted there was a written objection filed on this project by Mark Olsen, PID 20-116-22 11-0001. 3. I C. 52-177 -- Detached Frontage Road and Utility Improvements Along Hichway 5 There were no comments from the audience. 4. I.C. 52-195 -- Street and Utility Improvements on Falcon's Way There were no comments from the audience. 5. I.C. 52-197 -- Sanitary Sewer Throuch the Delecard property to Serve the Shores of Mitchell take Plat There were no comments from the audience. 6 ProPerty There were no comments from the audience. 7. I C. 5?-201 -- Utility gild Street Improvemenfs in the Sandv Pointe Add 4 tion There were no comments from the audience. 8. T.C. 11-20_3 Street and Util"-ies an at&L.ina Lane and Ridgv—R2Ad City Council Meeting 3 October 22, 1991 City Engineer Allen Gray said this project is in an existing neighborhood. He said it was an expensive project, primarily because of the large lot size in the neighborhood. Delta noted that two written objections had been received from LeRoy and Sharon Heitz for PID 21-116-22 43-0025 and Gerald and Kathleen Schwankl for PID 21- 116-22 42-0024. Gray noted that the Schwankls are being assessed on another project. LeRoy Heitz, 9281 E. Staring Lane, presented a letter objecting to the assessment for this project. He said he would like to have the Council appoint a non-partial board to hear his objection in private. Jullie said Staff will often work with property owners to come to some resolution that would then be approved by the Council. Heitz said he didn't think it was appropriate to discuss this with the Staff. He said he would like to discuss it with someone not affiliated with the Staff. Tenpas noted that the Council would review any items that were turned over to the Staff. Harris said that discussions turned over to Staff often result in accommodations to the property owners. Tenpas said he would be willing to talk to Mr. Heitz on an individual basis if Heitz so desired. A discussion followed regarding the purpose of tonight's meeting and the appeal process available to property owners. Pidcock noted that assessments approved tonight are immediately assessed against the property. Tenpas said the process gives the homeowner the opportunity to object to the assessment. Dietz said that a particular assessment may be excluded from the assessment roll at tonight's meeting and continued as an item at the next meeting. Pidcock also noted that it will cost the property owner from $5,000-$7,000 to appeal the assessment to District Court. Jullie said filing a written objection at tonight's meeting preserves the property owner's right to appeal to District Court; however, many property owners come in and discuss their objections wIth Staff in order to reach a resolution without going through the appeal process. Heitz said he felt he would have to hire an appraiser to substantiate how much the value of his property was increased by the improvements, and that he believed the City has reimbursed the property owners for the cost of such an appraisal in many cases. C11 City Council Meeting 4 October 22, 1991 Yvonne Hargens, 9060 W. Staring Lane, presented her formal objection to the assessments on their property, PID 21-116-22 42-0010. She said their assessment :s based on three unit lots, and the assessment exceeds the $45,000 maximum. Gray said that one unit of the three is homesteaded so that one unit has a $15,000 maximum. He said the other two lots are not homesteaded and would be assessed at $17,094.33 each; however, he said the amounts for the two non- homesteaded lots would be deferred until development. Hargens noted that the deferred assessment accrues interest and that both of the two non-homesteaded lots would take considerable preparation in order to be developed. Anderson asked for an explanation of the deferred assessment process. Gray explained that the assessment would be levied, but then is deferred. He said the property owner does not have to make payments until the City moves to remove the deferment. He said the City usually leaves the deferment in place until there is a subdivision of the property. Jessen noted that the deferment accrues with interest and has to be paid at such time as the property is subdivided, sold, or refinanced. He said he had some objections to that as he was not sure that is the right thing to do. Tenpas said he thought there was a valid point that with the accrual of interest the assessment may get so big that the owner might have to sell the property at a loss. Hargens said that from a competitive market analysis it is obvious that they do not gain an equivalent benefit, even if they were to subdivide the property and sell it. She noted that the appeal process would cost between $6,000-$7,000, which means that the appeal process would not be available to everyone. Hargens also expressed concern about the drainage ditch placed along the west and south border of their property. She said they were never contacted about the construction of the ditch. Pidcock asked why no easement was obtained f...:om the Hargens f3r the drainage ditch. Gray said they worked with the Schwankls on that, and the ditch should have been on the Schwankl property. He said he would be glad to meet with the ,T:argens to work out the problem and to provide restitution for any damage that occurred. City council meeting 5 October 22, 1991 Harris asked about the appraisals the Hargens had done on their property. Hargens replied that the realtor estimated they could get between $150,000-$155,000 for the three lots. Harris asked if there was an estimate on the increase in value from the proposed util1t2es. Hargens said the estimates were after the assessments. Daniel Lindholm, 9271 E. Staring Lane (PID 21-116-22 43-0027), said he thought his property value will not increase by $15,000 with the assessments. Doug Olson, 9030 W. Staring Lane (PID 21-116-22 42- 0008), said he didn't see any way that the improvements from the assessments will improve the value of his house by 20%. 9. I.C. 52-205 -- Utilities and Street Imorovements ou .Sunrise Circle East and West Gray said this is an existing neighborhood with unimproved streets. He said this was the highest cost project on a per unit basis, again primarily because of the size of the lots. Jessen asked how the costs compared with the feasibility study. Gray said it exceeded the estimated costs by about 15%. Pidcock said she was concerned about some of the elderly property owners such as Mrs. Tobias who might not understand the assessment process. Tenpas said he was concerned that we are creating a real problem in older neighborhoods by increasing the assessment beyond the value of the house and making it difficult for property owners to stay in their homes. Pidcock commented that we discuss having affordable housing in the City, yet this is an older residential neighborhood with affordable housing and we're forcing people cut with these high assessments. Tenpas said he thought the hardship comes when no subdivision occurs, and the equity in the home may then be dissipated because of the assessment. Heitz said he wanted to submit a ruling from Judge Atkins for the record. A copy was made of the document and is attached to the minutes. Tenpas suggested that the Council have an opportunity to review the ruling and then discuss it with Heitz. Jessen said he thought the real problem or dilemma occurs by improving an existing neighborhood when the lots are very large and the cost exceeds the $15,000 City Council Meeting 6 October 22, 1991 cap. He said he thought that if there is a cost overrun of more than 5%, it should be returned to the Council. He said there is an enormous expense that has to come out of the general taxpayer's pocket. He said he thought we need to figure out another way to deal with the problem. Pat Martell, 9140 W. Staring Lane (PID 21-116-22 42- 0023), noted that they had filed a written objection to the assessment. She said they are objecting because they cannot do anything with their property until the neighbors agree to subdivide and a street is put in to access the back part of their property. She asked that the 8% interest not accrue on the deferred amount. Anderson asked when we anticipate the road being put in. Gray said we can't put a timeline on it because there are three properties involved. Anderson said because the property is not developable until the road goes in, he thought they should not pay any interest or payment on the assessment until they have the opportunity to develop the property. Tenpas noted that might never happen. Lois Tobias, 9140 Sunrise Circle (PID 21-116-22 31- 0014), presented her objection to the assessment. Gloria Sullivan, 9060 East Sunrise Circle (PID 21-116- 22 31-0011), presented her objection to the assessment. 10. LC. 52-212 -- Street Improvements and Utilit 4 es in Cedar Ridce Road and Corral Lane Gray said this project was in a residential neighborhood, and the costs were almost identical to the estimates from the feasibility study. Jessen asked about the deferred amount on the McGraw property. Dietz replied that McGraw is also on the Mitchell Road project and they divided the amount between the two projects. Randy Rannow, 15908 Cedar Ridge Road (RID 21-116-22 23- 0005 and PID 21-116-22 23-0006), said he had submitted his written objection to the assessment. He said he was objecting to the storm 'ewer portion of the assessment, as he didn't understand why he should be assessed for something that he would not benefit from. Tenpas asked Gray if he thought Rannow's benefit is the same as everybody else'o. Gray said he thought it was because most of the benefit comes from the streen improvement. City Council Meeting October 22, 1991 Jessen asked how much the storm sewer portion was. Gray said it was about $1200 per lot and that it did reduce the amount of water that drains through Rannow's lot. Rannow said it might have decreased the water, but the City will not allow him to fill in the back portion of the lot. 11. SUPPLEMENTALS Gray said the first group includes trunk sewer and water assessments for some of the projects previously reviewed and also for new subdivisions. Dietz noted that the properties that have exclusions on them also have the trunk sewer and water assessment excluded until 1997 or connection. Dietz noted that a written objection was received from Edward and Julie Whelan (PID 21-116-22 22-0014) on the $1818.00 assessment for Trunk Sewer and Water. There were no comments from the audience regarding the supplemental assessments. 5. I.C. 52-197 -- Sanitary Sewer Throuah the Deleaard Prooertv to Serve the Shores of Mitchell Lake Plat At this point Duane Delegard presented his request to defer the payments on the $171,518.87 assessment until Dell Road comes through to the property. Gray noted that this was a 100% petition project; however, development is not proceeding at this time and Dell Road is not being extended. The consensus was that the deferment was reasonable. Returning to the discussion of the Supplemental Assessments, Jessen asked what the $35,277.00 subtrunk assessment was. Gray said this was an assessment to property south of Highway 5. Jessen asked what the Tax Forfeiture Supplemental was for. Dietz said this was the Chatham Woods property that had assessments of about $18,000. He said eight or ten of them went tax forfeiture; and, as they are sold, they must be reassessed in order to collect the balance of the special assessments. Tenpas asked if the Council meant to address the issue of deferred amounts as they relate to interest. Harris said she thought it was such an issue that any decision should be applied to other properties whose owners might not have been at the meeting. The Council then addressed each of the projects in order. 301 City Council Meeting 8 October 22, 1991 1. I.C. 52-156 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-156, Street and Utility Improvements on Mitchell Road. Motion carried 5-0. 2. I.C. 52-166 Dietz noted that there was an objection filed by Mark Olsen (FID 20-116-22 11-0001). MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded Ly Anderson, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-166, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalks and Street Improvements on Summit Drive, Meadowvale Drive and Red Oak Drive. Motion carried 5-0. 3. I.C. 52-177 MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-177, Detached Frontage Road and Utility Improvements Along Highway 5. Motion carried 5-0. 4. I.C. 72-195 MOTION Fidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-195, Street and Utility Improvements on Falcon's Way. Motion carried 5-0. 5. I.C. 52-197 MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-197, Sanitary Sewer Through the Delegard Property to Serve the Shores of Mitchell Lake Plat, subject to the deferral of the assessed amount until the completion of Dell Road to the property. Motion carried 5-0. 6. I.C- 52-193 MOTION: Pidcock moved, secnnded by Anderson, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-198, Sanitary Sewer to SefV,± the Loscheider ?rope:ty. Motion carried 5-0. 7. I.C. c2-201. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-201, 7ti1ity and Street Improvements in the Sandy Pointe Addition. - City Council Meeting 9 October 22, 1991 Motion carried 5-0. 8. I.C. 52-203 Dietz recommended that the entire project be continued because of the number of objections submitted. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harrie, to continue the special assessment for I.C. 52-203, Street and Utilities on Staring Lane and Ridge Road, to the next regular meeting of the Council. Motion carried 5-0. 9. I.C. 52-205 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the special assessment for I.C. 52-205, Utilities and Street Improvements on Sunrise Circle East and West, to the next regular meeting of the Council. Motion carried 5-0. 10. I.C. 52-212 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-212, Street improvements and Utilities in Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: With the consent of Anderson, Pidcock amended the motion to approve the special assessment for I.C. 52-212, Street Improvements and Utilities in Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane, with the exception of the assessment for the Rannow properties (PID 21-116-22 23-0005 and PID 21-116-22 23-0006) which will be continued to the next regular meeting of the Council. Motion carried 5-0. 11. SUPPLEMEHALS MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the special assessment for the Supplementals, with the exception of assessment for the Delegard property (PID 18-116-22 41-0002) which will be deferred until the completion of Dell Road to the property and the Whelan property (PID 21-116-22 22-0014) which will be reduced to the homestead rate. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue the Proposed 1991 Special Assessments (Resolution No. 91-24C) to the November 5th :feting of the City Council. Motion carried 5-0. III. O'HER BUSINESS A . for Council Review ?o5 City Council Meeting 10 October 22, 1991 Pidcock said she would like Staff to review and bring together information on codes of ethics for councils and commissions from other cities for the next workshop meeting of the Council. Jessen said he was concerned about the $504,000 management fee included in the prospectus for the subsidized housing. He said he thought it was important to review such proposals. Jullie said the information was available at the time the proposal was discussed. Tenpas said Staff and he have met with the School District, Norwest Bank and the lister of the CPT building. He said that Norwest Bank has hired a consulting firm to put together a program and analysis to determine the costs and feasibility of renovating that building to accommodate our needs. He said we should hear back on that in about three weeks. IV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 PM. Motion carried 5-0. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST November 5, 1991 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Luxury Homes, Inc. Rem Con, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Contempra Remodeling Evans Additions Nema, Inc. Open Class Construction L. M. Peterson Co. Pools, Inc. The Renovators, Inc. Dean Semmer Construction S. W. Sharpe Co. Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Total Refrigeration PLUMBING Arnold Bing Plumbing, Inc. PEDDLER Patrick Coty (Christmas Trees) Gregory Wolthuizen (firewood) Robert Walsh (firewood) These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Licensing MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources '114°t• DATE: October 29, 1991 SUBJECT: Recommendation on Selection of Architect for Community Center Addition RECOMMENDATION: After reviewing proposals for architectural/engineering services for the Community Center addition submitted by five companies, the architect review committee interviewed four firms on October 24th. The four firms interviewed were BRW, Cluts O'Brien & Strother Architects and Del Erickson Architects, Kodet Architectural Services, and Setter Leach and Lindstrom, Inc. The architect review committee was made up of Kevin Schmieg, Director of Buildings and Inspections; Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works; Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect; David Black, Community Center Manager; Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services; and Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. Each individual on the selection committee rated the proposals based on professional qualifications, past involvement in similar projects, their statement of design approach, and their fee proposal. After reviewing the written data and spending approximately one hour with each of the four finalists, the review committee recommends the City Council select the firms of Delano Erickson Architects and Clots O'Brien and Strother Architects for the purpose of providing architectural and engineering services for the Community Center addition as per the Request for Proposal previously reviewed by the City Council. FEE PROPOSAL: The fee proposals provided by each company as per the RFP were as follows: Delano Erickson Architects/Clots O'Brien Strother Architects $123,000 Setter Leach and Lindstrom $125,000 Kodet Architectural Services $112,000 BRW $135,000 Several of the firms suggested the contract should add site master plan design to the contract in order to ensure a complete analysis of the site for this addition and any future additions such as a gymnasium, etc. City staff would recommend adding site master plan design to the architect contract for an additional $2,500; therefore, the recommended fee for design purposes would be $125,500. Recommendation on Selection of Architect October 28, 1991 Page 2 EXPERIENCE: Delano Erickson Architects has extensive experience in the design of public recreational facilities including similar projects to Eden Prairie's proposed addition, such as the Braemar Arena addition and remodeling, the Burnsville Ice Arena addition and the Osseo Arena remodeling. Cluts, O'Brien, Strother Architects has experience with the following recreational facilities: Flagship Athletic Club, Maple Grove Community Center, North End Multi Service Center in St. Paul. Lundquist, Willmar, Potvin and Bender have experience in the construction of ice arenas and recreation centers including this partial list: Chaska Community Center, Braemar Ice Pavilion, Victory Memorial Ice Arena in Minneapolis, Civic Center Ice Arena West St. Paul, Runestone Ice Arena in Alexandria, Bieck Ice Arena, Farmington Community Ice Arena, Red Wing Community Ice Arena, Hastings Community and School Ice Arena, Cottage Grove Community Ice Arena, and many more. City staff believe that this project team has extensive experience in working with the design and construction of community recreation facilities and will provide a facility that meets all of our needs within our proposed budget (1.8 million) and time line (December 1992 completion). FINANCING THIS PROJECT: Funds for this project are included in the proposed Capital Improvement Financing Plan which includes $500,000 in the 1992 budget. The Capital Financing Plan calls for financing the construction of the arena through lease revenue bonds that would be sold in 1992. BL:mdd recarch/bob z?cr) PROJECT TEAM PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT & DESIGN: ARCHITECT & PRODUCTION MANAGER: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: ACOUSTICAL CONSULTING: Del Erickson, A.I.A. Delano Erickson Architects • Overall responsibility for architectural services and design, coordination of consultants and interaction with City and its committees. Daniel S. O'Brien, A.I.A. Cluts, O'Brien, Strother Architects • Design and development of contract documents drawing on recreational experience such as multi-use fitness centers like the Flagship Athletic Club. Paul Strother, C.S.I. Cluts, O'Brien, Strother Architects • Quality control in specifications, contract documents and construction administration. Harold Bakke, P.E. Bakke, Kopp, Ballou & McFarlin • Structural analysis and design for structures, including long span and material analysis related to pools, arenas and gymnasiums. Len Lundquist, P.E. Lundquist, Wilmer, Potvin & Bender • Mechanical design utilizing appropriate systems developed by project team and incorporating approach geared to needs of Eden Prairie. Ron Wilmar, P.E. Lundquist, Wilmar, Potvin & Bender • Electrical design and control systems to satisfy general and critical areas of lighting, power and communications. Tim Erkkila, R.L.A. Westwood Professional Services • Landscape design in concert with the site needs and project team. Bill Kroll, P.E. Wm. H.O. Kroll Associates • Acoustic design input related to shape of space and materials for good sound control as well as separation. ARCHITECT & SPECIFICATION PRODUCTION: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING: Eden Prairie Community Center Addition PAGE 3 ,333 ROBIN 8 THOMPSON. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 446 EAST LAME STREET SLOTE P30 WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55301 TELEPHONE NSIZI A7S-102S TELECOP1ER tet21 978-4•47 October 15, 1991 The Honorable Douglas B. Tenpas and Members of the Eden Prairie City Council City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-3677 RE: Schwab Developer's Agreement Dear Mayor and Council Members: I am writing on behalf of Jerome J. Schwab who entered into a Developer's Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie on September 4, 1990. Paragraph III of Exhibit C to the Developer's Agreement provides, in substance, that the Developer's failure to proceed in accordance with the Agreement within 24 months of [September 4, 19901 may result in an unopposed rezoning of the property to a rural status. As suggested by Mr. Don Uram one of the Eden Prairie City Planners, I am writing to set forth the reasons the development has not yet commenced and to request a 24 month extension to proceed before any rezoning process may commence. Development of the property and the subsequent transfer upon completion of the development are contingent, in part, upon the contemporaneous sale of a commercial building which happens to be located adjacent to the property in the Edenvale Industrial Park. Although there have been continuous marketing efforts to arrange for the sale of this building, no buyer has yet submitted an acceptable offer, apparently due to the depressed commercial real estate market. In any event, it is unrealistic that the City of Eden Prairie or any other party would desire a rezoning of the undeveloped property to a rural status because of its location in the Edenvale Industrial Park and its being surrounded by other commercial office/warehouse buildings. On behalf of Mr. Schwab, we respectfully request that the City of Eden Prairie grant a 24 month extension from September 4, 1992 to September 4, 1994 for Mr. Schwab, as Developer, to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement prior to the commencement of any rezoning process affecting the property. ROBIN & THOMISON,A P.A. tivU Bruce D. Crist The Honorable Douglas B. Tenpas and Members of the Eden Prairie City Council October 15, 1991 Page 2 If you have any questions or I can provide any additional Information please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, BDC:lmd cc: Mr. Ralph C. Deuschle Mr. Jerome J. Schwab Mr. Wayne A. Jeske CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 91-241 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BLUFFS EAST 11TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Bluffs East 11th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Bluffs East 11th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 30, 1991. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOFTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 5, 1991. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, P.E., City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: October 30, 1991 SUBJECT: Final Plat of Bluffs East 11th Addition PROPOSAL: Hustad Development Corporation has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Bluffs East llth Addition. Located north of Bluff Road and west of County Road 18, the p l a t contains 4.23 acres to be divided into 12 single family lots and road right-of-way for s t r e e t purposes. This proposal is a further development of the Bluffs East PUD and is a subdivis i o n of Outlot B, Bluffs East 7th Addition. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council October 15, 1991 per Resolution No. 91-230. Second reading of Ordinance No. 28-91-PUD-9-91, is scheduled for final approval at the City Council meeting to be held November 5, 1991. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution Novembe r 5, 1991. VARIANCES: All variance requests not originally granted through the PUD process must be approved through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: The owners have petitioned the City for the installation of municipal utilities, roadways and walkways. This petition was submitted to the City Council September 1 7 , 1991, along with a request for a change order to add this project on to an existing pub l i c improvement contract. As stated in the Developer's Agreement, prior to release of the final plat the owner shall en t e r into a Special Assessment Agreement with the City for the public street and utility improvem e n t s on the property. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Bluffs East 11th Addition s u b j e c t to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $374.00 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,296.00 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $480.00 4. Execution of Special Assessment Agreement JJ:ssa cc: Hustad Development Hedlund Engineering CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 PROJECT: Staring Lane and Sunrise Circle Street and Utility Improvements Eden Prairie, Minnesota City Project No. I.C. 52-203 and 52-205 RCM Project No. 10092.02 TO: Richard Knutson, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract. This contract change is to Part B, LC. 52-205, Sunrise Circle. NATURE OF CHANGE TO PART A OF CONTRACT: NONE NATURE OF CHANGE TO PART B OF CONTRACT: 1. Clear and grub trees along the revised sanitary sewer alignment from MH 7 to MM 8 located on the east side of Mitchell Road in the Boulder Pointe 2nd Addition development. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES AND COSTS: Add the following quantities and costs to Contract A: NONE Add the following quantities and costs to Contract B: 1. Clear and Grub 1 LS $5,000.00 $5.000.00 Part B - Total Addition $5,000.00 Contract Amount Part A Increase to Part A Resulting From this Change Order Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order Part A Contract Amount Part B Increase to Part B Resulting From this Change Order Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order Part B Total Contract Value Including this Change Order $663,110.75 0.00 $663,110.75 $536,939.25 5.000,00 $541,939.25 $1,205,050.00 01;13 By By • KN 4, ON, INC Ave ...ipee iazzek RICHA By Date The Above Changes are Approved RCM ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Date The Above Charms are Accepted, October 9, 1991 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 PROJECT: Mitchell Road and Sandy Pointe Addition Improvements Eden Prairie, Minnesota City Project No. I.C. 52-156 and 52-201 RCM Project No. 10030.03 TO: Nodland Construction Company, Inc. You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract. These contract changes are to Part A and Part B, I.C. 52-201, Sandy Pointe Addition. NATURE OF CHANGE TO PART A OF CONTRACT: IA. Furnish and install a four tier, block retaining wall to protect the rear lot property lines from slope failure due to road embankment requirements. Said retaining wall is located at south side of Mitchell Road between Station 14+60 and 19+00 abutting P.I.D. No. 21-116-22-31-0005 and P.I.D. No. 21-116-22-31-0029. 2A. Furnish and install a 6-inch bituminous curb along Hennepin County Road No. 1 to facilitate drainage and minimize erosion. Location, westbound right turn lane from Hennepin County Road No. Ito Mitchell Road. 3A. Relocate fire hydrant to avoid interference with retaining wall. Location Station 18+30 Mitchell Road, south side. 40er--ft-ePTir -wattrnmilrgate -wt+ve -benc-ctalTizgettriffiltneratee-e+-Gove -Pftnt-Rvad--. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES AND COSTS: Add thc following quantities and costs to the contract: PART A For IA. above: Furnish and Install Modular Precast Concrete Retaining Wall Lump Sum For 2A. above: 6-inch Bituminous Curb - 1035 LF @ $4.02/LF $79,965.00 $4,160.70 Page 1 of 2 2 By By Date For 3A. above: Relocate Fire Hydrant Each For 4A. above: 41evair—Wasccsna.in--Ge+e—Vsrire- Each PART A: TOTAL ADDITION Contract Amount, Part A With Previous Change Orders 01 and *2 Increase to Part A Resulting From this Change Order Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order Contract Amount, Part B with Previous Change Orders #1 and *2 Increase to Part B Resulting From this Change Order Total Part B Total Contract Value Including This Change Order S425.00 456476-1-37713-42.45-Sb.70 $590,561.50 81 1;531):70 S675,375.20•425:lia.74, $135,493.60 0,00 $135,493.60 Se+07864.4008104o58c The Above Changes are Aooroved CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By The Above Channes are Accented NODLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. aa Date 426LdQ/ Page 2 of 2 Brown and Cris, Inc. CHANGE ORDER 1/2 Date: 10-22-91 To: City of Eden Prairie City Improvement Contract #: 52-212 Project Name: Eden Hills Contractor: Brown and Cris, Inc. Engineer: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. The following work is hereby requested to be performed under this contract: 1. Street and utility improvements of Bluff East 11th Addition, I.C. 52-243, according to the plans and specifications prepared by HTPO. Date of substantial completion of work described in Change Order #2 shall be November 27, 1991. Date of final completion shall be July 30, 1992. The following cost adjustments are applied to the contract cost: 1. Add labor and material costs (see attached estimated quantities and unit prices). $ 36,276.65 Summary of Contract Changes: Original Contract Amount $450,754.75 Net Increase resulting from Change Order 1/1 4,841.16 Net Increase resulting from Change Order #2 36,276.65 Current Contract Amount including Change Order #1 and #2 $491,872.56 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. City of Eden Prairie By (-11 (,),./i'.(4 By Date m-y9-qc Date THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: d31() Addendum to Agreement No. PW 19-15-90 County Project No. 7419 County State Aid Highway No. 62 City of Eden Prairie City of Minnetonka County of Hennepin ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT FOR C.S.A.H. NO. 62 (MPWIMaNE ROAD) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1991, by and between the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ("Eden Prairie"), the CITY OF MINNETONKA ("Minnetonka"), and the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ("County"), all bodies politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Agreement for Participation in the Cost of An Engineering Study dated April 17, 1990 ("the Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the scope of work contemplated in the Agreement has been completed, but the parties wish to share the cost of additional work related to the same project. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: 1. Paragraph I of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: Minnetonka will contract with Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc. (SRF), under Minnetonka's general services agreement with -1- g311 Addendum to Agreement No. PW 19-15-90 that firm, to conduct an engineering study and an environmental assessment worksheet for the Townline Road project in accordance with the Scopes of Work attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B ("the contract"). 2. Paragraph II of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: The contract will be for an amount not to exceed $158,000. The amount of the contract may be increased only upon the authorization of all parties. 3. Paragraph VI of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: The County agrees that the costs incurred by Minnetonka and Eden Prairie for the SRF study and worksheet shall be credited to them as part of their shares of the project costs, if the project is constructed. 4. In all other respects the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. -2- - • OCT i9L1 '1". • October 15, 1991 Mr. Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 RE: Townline Road EAW Extension of Three-Party Agreement Dear Gene: Please find enclosed the proposed amendment to Agreement No. PW 19-15-90 between Hennepin County and the Cities of Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. As you know, the original agreement addressed cost sharing between the three parties for services provided by Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc. (SRF) in terms of a traffic study and design concept study for the proposed upgrading of Townline Road. The County Engineer and the two City Managers have agreed that the cost of SRF's services to prepare the EAW should be similarly shared. The proposed amendment will simply be an extension of the existing agreement, which was not to exceed the amount of $131,000, to include the Scope of Work for the EAW upon which all parties have agreed. The not to exceed cost of the EAW work is $34,110, a portion of which is to be offset by funds remaining from the original agreement. Our records indicate that to date we have authorized payment in the amount of $123,578.44, resulting in $7,421.56 to be offset against the amount of the EAW. The result is that the amendment should extend to a total amount of $158,000. I have reviewed the invoices submitted by SRF to date under the terms of the existing three-party agreement. This covers the period from April of 1990 through September of 1991. During that period, no invoices were submitted to Hennepin County or Eden Prairie for work performed by SRF on behalf of the City of Minnetonka during the months of February, March, April, and July ao Mr. Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. October 15, 1991 Page 2 of this year. In May, June, and August of 1991, SRF personnel assisted us with Townline Road evaluations and attended meetings regarding specific Minnetonka concerns. The time charged by SR! staff in this regard equates to $1,242.61, resulting in Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie each due a credit of $414.20. The three-party cost sharing under the terms of the amendment is as follows: Paid to EAW Credit Amended Date Costs Due Shares Hennepin County Eden Prairie Minnetonka TOTALS $ 41,192.81 41,192.81 41.192.81 $123,578.43 $ 11,473.86 $ 414.20 $ 52,252.47 11,473.86 414.20 52,252.47 11.473.36 (828.401 53.495.07 $ 34,421.58 $ 0.00 $158,000.01 At such time as you have had the opportunity to review this amendment, please notify me, and I will circulate copies for signature. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience should you have any questions. Sincerely, * David J. Sonnenberg, P.E. Director of Engineering DJS/ph enc. cc: James F. Miller, city Manager AppRovID: (()(7.116,.41.. es,/.99i 7:/e. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 91-158 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE EDEN PRAIRIE COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ADD 317 + ACRES INTO THE EDEN PRAIRIE MUSA LINE WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature enacted the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act which requires Eden Prairie to revise the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared an amendment to the Guide Plan and conducted numerous neighborhood and City meetings regarding said amendment; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council, on April 11, 1991, adopted Referral Report #91-23 adopting the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan according to the recommendations of the Community Development Committee; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has reviewed the Plan in detail and held its first meeting, a public hearing, on September 24, 1990. At such hearing the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council did receive the Planning Commission's recommendations for adoption on October 16, 1990 and did hold a public hearing on same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment dated November 5, 1991, is hereby adopted. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of November, 1991. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk a5a RESOLUTION NO.e7l'eo' RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES RELAT I N G TO COMPLTANCE WITH REIMOURSEHENISOND REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council" ) o f the City of Eden Prairie . Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1 Recitals. 1.01. The Internal Revenue Service has issued p r o p o s e d Treasury Regulations, Sections 1.103-17 and 1.10 3 - 1 8 r e l a t i n g t o "reimbursement bonds". The term "reimbursement bond" means that portion of a bond issue the proceeds Of which are allocated t o reimburse an expenditure that was paid prior to t h e d a t a o f i S S U O of the bond isaue. The term "reimbursement bond " d o e s n o t inolude, and this resolution does) not apply to, t h a t p o r t i o n o f a bond Josue the proceeds of which are allocated to pay o r r e i m b u r s e an expenditure that is paid on or after the dat a o f i s s u e o f t h e bond issue. 1.02. The Regulations generally require that, p r i o r t o making an expenditure with respect to the acquisi t i o n C r construction of property (a "project expenditure " ) w h i c h t h e C i t y proposes to reimburse itself for from reimburseme n t b o n d p r o c e e d s , the City make a declaration of ite official inte n t ( a "Declaration") to reimburse itself for such proj e c t e x p e n d i t u r e Out of the proceeds of subsequently issued taxab l e o r t a x e x e m p t bonds or other obligations (a "subsequent borrowing"); that such declaration generally be made on a date not More t h a n t w o y e a r s before the date of the expenditure; that the subsequent borrowing occur and a reimbursement allocation be made fr o m t h e p r o c e e d s o f the subsequent borrowing within one year after t h e p r o j e c t expenditure is made or the property with respect to which it i s made is placed in service, whichever is longer; end that the project expenditure relate to property having a reasonably expected economic life of at least one year. 1.03. The purpose of this Resolution is to est a b l i s h certain procedures to be followed by designated C i t y o f f i c e r s t o comply with the requirements of the Regulations. The proce d u r e s established hereby are not exclusive. This Coun c i l r e s e r v e s t h e right to make Declarations from time to time wit h r e s p e c t t o certain project expenditures at its discretion a n d t o a m e n d t h i s resolution to comply with changes in the Regula t i o n s . r, A Section 2. DesaazatjauLfaLatficiai_intent The Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Firm= Director to make the City's Declarations or to delegate from time to time that responsibility to other appropriate City employees. Each Declaration shall comply with the requirements of the Regulations, including without limitation the following: (1) Each Declaration shall be made prior to the time the City pays the applicable project expenditure (except for project expenditures not reasonably foreeeable within the meaning of Section 1.103-17(h) Of the Regulations) and shall state that the City intends to reimburse itself for the project expenditure out of the proceeds of a subsequent borrowing. A Declaration may relate to project expenditures for all or a portion of a single capital improvement project and to one or more such projects. Each Declaration may be made substantially in the form of the Exhibit A which is attached to and made a part of this Resolution. (2) Each Declaration shall and is hereby declared to comprise part of the official books, records, and proceedings of the City, and shall be maintained as a public record in the office of the City Clerk. Each Declaration shall be available for inspection by the general public during normal business hours of the City on every business day during the period beginning on the earlier of 10 days after the making of the Declaration or the date of issuance of the reimbursement bonds and ending on the day after the issuance of such bonds. (3) Each Declaration shall contain a reasonably accurate general functional description of the type and USO of the property for which the project expenditure to be reimbursed is paid, including the anticipated size, quantity or cost of the property and other information sufficient so that a person who is not familiar with the property would generally understand the nature and function of that property. (4) Each Declaration shall identify the reasonably expected source or 'Sources of funds that will be used by the City to pay the reimbursement expenditure (prior to and in anticipation of the issuance of the reimbursement bonds), together with the reasonably expected source or sources of funds to be used by the City to pay the debt service on the reimbursement bonds. (5) The City Finance Director is hereby authorized to revise or withdraw a Declaration if and to the extent, as a result of changer' circumstances, the Declaration no longer reflecte the intent of the City. -2- 9).2 (6) Care shall be taken so that the City, or its authorized representatives under this Resolution, not make Declarations in canes where the City will not ultimately be imbuing reimbursement bonds to provide long-term financing for the subject project costs, and the City officials are hereby authorized to consult with bond counsel to the City concerning the requirements of the Regulations in general and their application in particular circumstances. (7) The City Finance Director shall advise the Council from time to time on the desirability fInd timing of the issuance of reimbursement bonds relating to project expenditures for which the City has made Declarations, including recommendations on the timing of the issuance of Such bonds 80 that reimbursement allocations required by the Regulations can be made Within the time limits prescribed in the Regulations. Section 3 Reinbursement Allnratinpe. The City Finance Director is also authorized and directed to make the reimbursement allocations described in the Regulations ("reimbursement allocatiofte") with respect to project expenditures that are the subject of Declarations made pursuant to this resolution or otherwise, being generally the transfer promptly following the receipt thereof of the appropriate amount of reimbursement bond proceeds to reimburse the source of temporary financing used by the City to make payment of the project expenditure. Each reimbursement allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books of the City maintained for such reimbursement bonds, shall specifically identify the project expenditure being reimbursed and Shall be effective to relieve the bond proceeds so allocated from any restriction under the bond resolution and under any state statute governing the expenditure of the bond proceeds. ADOPTED by the C ty Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of , 1991. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk 2323.6 MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Carl J. Jullie, City Manager John Frane, Finance Director October 30, 1991 1992 Budget - Voting Machines Because of redistricting information received from Mike Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, and price lists from Business Records Corporation, we have reexamined our 1992 budget request for voting machines. We feel it would be prudent to increase the number of tabulators purchased from three to four. If ordered by December 1, a savings of $1300 per tabulator can be realized. Budgeted for 1992 is $34,120; an additional $2960 would be needed to acquire the fourth machine. We request authorization to order four tabulators to be charged against the 1992 budget. 3e';'( -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E., Director of Public Works DATE: October 31, 1991 SUBJECT: Continued Special Assessment Hearing Staring Lane/Ridge Road, I.C. 52-203 Sunrise Circle, LC. 52-205 RECOMMENDATION Although other issues were raised, the two primary public hearing continuations were concerning projects for the Sunrise Circle and Staring Lane/Ridge Road neighborhoods. After considerable staff debate, including input from Mr. Pauly, we recommend the following to conclude these two projects: A. For homesteaded parcels receiving more that one unit of benefit, we recommend that we treat the one homesteaded unit in the same manner as other single homesteaded units in the neighborhood. Additional units would then be assessed at the full cost with no City subsidy (same as originally proposed) but deferred with zero percent interest until development/subdivision (rather than 8.0% accruing without a cap). B. We recommend that the policy establishing a maximum $15,000 assessment per homesteaded unit be maintained in both projects. The balance of this memorandum will provide the reasoning used to come to these conclusions. MULTIPLE UNIT BENEFIT In the two projects, we received four objections regarding multiple benefit assessments, three of which cited the burden of the deferred portion of the assessment accruing interest as the primary problem. Upon further discussion at staff level, we recognize the problems associated with such a policy. If a property owner chooses to wait ten years to take advantage of subdividing the property for resale, the principal amount of the assessment would increase by 80% and negate much of the value of the property. The best solution that we come to in this situation is that the principal amount for the extra lot units be fixed at the full cost of the improvements ($17,094.33 in Staring Lane/Ridge Road neighborhood and $21,246.99 in the Sunrise Circle neighborhood) and that the full amount be deferred until subdivision with no interest accruing. Upon subdivision, interest would begin to accrue at the rate established for the project (8%) and be assessed for five years as we do for other development projects. The 09, principal amount varies for some of the multiple unit assessments based on whether or not streets are being assessed or just partial benefit for storm sewer and utilities. The intent would be to levy the amount as listed in the assessment role on the additional units at no interest until subdivision occurs. While it might be argued that the amount of the full cost of the improvements are high, the improvements themselves make it possible for subdivision to occur and further subsidy by the City down to the homesteaded rate of $15,000 is not advised. One of the major points of discussion at staff level is the precedent set by this potential policy and its impact on past and future assessments. At this writing, we have not tabulated the potential, but Council may recall this issue arising on Bluff Road, Franlo Road and Mitchell Road to name a few. We will come to the council meeting prepared to more closely identify the financial impact to the City if we were to make this policy change retroactive over the last several years. On the surface, it would seem that the assessments for multiple units with interest accruing could be sustainable, since it allows the development of the property. However, the burden of the accruing interest would require immediate action on the part of property owners in order to avoid the interest dilemma, which is contrary to one of our special assessment policies that states "It is the specific purpose of the City Council to make provisions in the special assessment proceedings so as not to force a homesteaded property into premature development or early sale because of an improvement project." Deleting the accrual of interest is therefore a reasonable solution to prevent this from happening. It may, however, require that we be more selective in project development to reduce the impact to the General Fund. $15,000 ASSESSMENT LIMIT ON HOMESTEADED PARCELS In addition to the four objections noted above, we received twelve objections regarding the maximum amount of $15,000 for homesteaded lots. When the City Council reviewed the special assessment policies as adopted in 1989, we recognized that there would be projects like these two that would be expensive. Due to the rather haphazard lotting pattern in both of these neighborhoods, the efficiency of street frontage to lot size is very poor resulting in a substantially higher cost for improvements than is typical in newer subdivisions in Eden Prairie. However, these larger lots are an amenity to the homes and providing drainage and a dust-free, all weather driving surface along these larger frontages certainly is a benefit to the property. Other recent decisions have compounded the problem causing the project cost to increase. For example, when the multiple unit project west of Sunrise Circle was being reviewed, the Sunrise Circle neighborhood was adamant that there should be separation from their neighborhood and that no access to Sunrise Circle be taken by the development. This resulted in a significant length of Sunrise Circle having to be constructed with no benefit to the multiple unit project. Further, when the subdivision on LaRivier Court was being reviewed, a potential sanitary sewer installation and drainage solution was proposed at developer expense but could not gain concurrence by all the effected property owners. The result was a duplication of effort on the part of the developer and no attributable benefit to the neighborhood. Through the policies of our special assessment practices, the City has done a great deal to limit the burden to existing homesteaded properties as follows: A. Through the provision of a $15,000 cap, the City will subsidize the actual cost for these projects at $2,094.33 for each of the lot units on Staring Lane and Ridge Road and $6,246.99 per lot unit on Sunrise Circle improvements. B. Through the exclusion policy for utility improvements, the Staring Lane/Ridge Road neighborhood will be assessed $10,058.86 in 1992 and will exclude $4,941.14 for a five- year period or until connection of the utilities at zero percent interest. If the property owner has a functioning well and septic system and can wait at least five years before connection, the City will write off interest in the amount of $1,976.40 for each of these lots. In the Sunrise Circle neighborhood, the 1992 assessment for street and storm sewer is $9,401.16 and the excluded amount for a five-year period at zero percent interest is $5,598.84. The resulting subsidy for those parcels not connecting sooner than five years is $2,239.54. The purpose of this exclusion policy is to recognize that many homes do have functional private sewer and water systems. In addition to the interest amount for the utility systems being subsidized, the resultant staggered assessments allow for a staged payment plan that will result in reduced annual payments for the first five years and a larger payment for the last fifteen years. Attached are exhibits showing the repayment schedule for Staring Lane/Ridge Road and the Sunrise Circle projects. If the entire $15,000 were levied in the first year, the first year's principal and interest payment would be $1,950.00. C. Although not part of the lateral benefit assessment, the trunk assessment of $520 is also subsidized by the City. This again reflects the consideration we make for the fact that the property owners have on-site systems that have some value. This trunk assessment has remained constant since 1970. For non-homesteaded properties, the rate is $3,000 per acre, which translates to approximately $1,500 for a typical one-half acre lot. In fact, most lots exceed one-half acre in size. Special assessments are always timely for some and create a burden for others. This of course is witnessed by the fact that approximately half of the property owners in each of the neighborhoods supported the original position and approximately half were opposed to it. In the final analysis, through the subsidized process by the City, we are asking each homesteaded property owner to invest in their property the equivalent amount of a new car to be paid for over a 20-year period with 8% simple interest. In exchange, it is our opinion that their values of their property will be increased by that amount (or more) upon resale of their homes and that a higher level of service to their properties can be maintained. We recommend therefore that the $15,000 assessment for homesteaded properties be sustained. The true test for special assessments is that the amount of the assessment has to be equal to or less than the amount of the increased value of the property. It is the staff opinion that this will occur throughout the neighborhood. In fact, it is our opinion that in all probability the increased valuation will be more dramatic on the lesser valued homes than on the higher valued homes in the neighborhood. However, if the City Council determines a different conclusion, an alternative would be to seek an appraisal of a typical home in each of the neighborhoods for review at a continued hearing. Through a recent change in the special assessment statutes, we now have until December 2 to certify the special assessments to the County for collection. If the City Council so chooses, it would be necessary to authorize two appraisals at the November 5 hearing and continue the hearing until November 26 for review of the resultant information. In general, this would seem to make sense, but we have not adopted this process in the past -- primarily because of the short time line between inception of the project and the desire to get the work completed and assessed. While it is true that an assessment appeal to district court would be a costly undertaking to a property owner, it would be helpful to keep in mind that we did receive valid petitions from the neighborhoods requesting the project in the first place. The feasibility report for Sunrise Circle estimated that the project cost would approach $17,000 per lot unit and that the $15,000 cap would be in place. The Staring Lane/Ridge Road feasibility study estimated that the project would cost $14,109 per lot unit and as a result of concerns expressed about the tentative storm sewer design at the public hearing, changes were made that resulted in higher project costs to bring it to $15,000 cap. SUMMARY In summary, we believe that a compromise to resolve the issue of multiple unit assessments for homesteaded properties is both necessary and reasonable. The cost of that policy change at this point in time has a price tag associated with it and we will be prepared to discuss that more fully at the council meeting. Further, it is our opinion that the City has acted in good faith with the residents of these two neighborhoods concerning the amount of the proposed assessment per lot unit and that the community at large is supporting the project by subsidizing the cost beyond $15,000 to bring the project to a similar standard as the rest of the City of Eden Prairie. It is our opinion that we have substantial evidence to maintain the maximum assessment of $15,000 for homesteaded properties, but we are prepared to seek appraisals if the Council chooses. REPAYMENT SCHEDULE STARING LANE/RIDGE ROAD 20 Years at 8% Year Balance _ Principal Interest Total P & I 1 10,058.86 502.94 938.83* 1,441.77 2 9,555.92 502.94 764.47 1,267.41 3 9,052.98 502.94 724.24 1,227.18 4 8,550.04 502.94 684.00 1,186.94 5 8,047.10 502.94 643.77 1,146.71 6 12,988.24 865.88 1,039.06 1,904.94 7 12,122.36 865.88 969.79 1,835.67 8 11,256.48 865.88 900.52 1,766.40 9 10,390.60 865.88 831.25 1,697.13 10 9,524.72 865.88 761.98 1,627.86 11 8,658.84 865.88 692.71 1,558.59 12 7,792.96 865.88 623.44 1,489.32 13 6,927.08 865.88 554.17 1,420.05 14 6,061.20 865.88 484.90 1,350.78 15 5,195.32 865.88 415.63 1,281.61 16 4,329.44 865.88 346.36 1,212.24 17 3,963.56 865.88 317.08 1,182.96 18 2,597.68 865.88 207.81 1,073.69 19 1,731.80 865.88 138.54 1,004.42 20 865.92 865.88 69.27 935.15 First year interest is for 14 months (November and December 1991 and 1992) REPAYMENT SCHEDULE SUNRISE CIRCLE 20 Years at 8% Year Balance Principal Interest Total P & El 1 9,401.16 470.06 877.44* 1,347.50 2 8,931.10 470.06 714.49 1,184.55 3 7,990.98 470.06 639.28 1,109.34 4 7,520.92 470.06 601.67 1,371.7Z 5 7,050.86 470.06 564.07 1,034.13 6 12,649.70 843.31 1,011.98 1,855.29 7 11,806.39 843.31 944.51 1,787.82 8 10,963.08 843.31 877.05 1,720.36 9 10,119.82 843.31 809.59 1,652.90 10 9,276.51 843.31 742.12 1,585.43 11 8,433.20 843.31 674.66 1,517.97 12 7,589.89 843.31 607.19 1,450.50 13 6,746.58 843.31 539.73 1,383.04 14 , 5,903.27 843.31 472.26 1,315.57 15 5,059.96 843.31 404.80 1,248.11 16 4,216.65 843.31 337.33 1,180.64 17 3,373.34 843.31 269.87 1,113.18 18 2,530.03 843.31 202.40 1,045.71 19 1,686.72 843.31 134.94 978.25 20 843.41 843.31 67.47 910.78 First year interest is for 14 months (November and December 1991 and 1992) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 91-240A WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections in the proposed assessments for the following improvements to wit: (See Exhibit A attached) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie: 1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit A. Installments shall bear interest at the rates shown on Exhibit A, commencing January 1, 1992. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 15, 1991. 3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes beginning in 1992. 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearings as provided for the assessments being made, upon any properties abutting on the improvements but not herein assessed for the improvement when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 5. The assessment data of Resolution No. 91-225 is herein revised in accordance with Exhibit A attached hereto. FIRST APPROVED on October 22, 1991 with exceptions noted and finally adopted on November 5, 1991. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk 3. I.C. 52-177 Detached frontage road and utility improvements along Project Cost: $ 639,794.48 Highway 5 MnDOT Share: $ 129,967.63 City Share: $ 59,685.60 Net Assessment: $ 4411,139.25 5 Years at 8 % Parcel PID// Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SAmount :'..211l,-116-22-11-0005 . Pro litiftieo : .. . :: Llitplilted , ,125 .100.94 ..::18-110•224Z0001 _ a: - ..,Ye •,•:*TandetrilCilrportdi Okiii*Oit., :.. 222.115841:!: ..: ,.....; 5. I.C. 52-197 Sanitary Sewer through the Delegard Property to serve the Shores of Mitchell Lake Plat. Lump Sum Sanitary Sewer Assessment Project Cost: City Share: Net Assessment: 5 Years at 8 % $ 171,518.87 - 0 - $ 171,518.87 Parcel PID# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SAmount -18-110...4241.000 Mitebell Lake, E 440 I 7 1 , 5 I 8 1t7 .-- 21-116-22-23-0033 r04;4.0.*P44! t 41644 LC. 52-201 Utility and street improvements in the Sandy Pointe Project Cost: Addition City Share: Net Assessment: $16,463.08 Per Lot 5 Years at 8.0 % $ 197,556.95 i - 0 -‘ I$ 197,556.95 Parcel PID# 1997 5Amount 1992 SAmount Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 5Amount 21-116-22-23-0032 Zachman Homes Sandy Pointe LI BI Zachnuut Homes Sandy Pointe Li B2 21-116-22-24-0004 Zachnum Homes Sandy Pointe L2 82 16,463.08 21-116-22-24-0005 Zachman Homes Sandy Pointe 13 82 16.463.08 21-116q2. '2006 Llichninnliettie$ 'UdY)%441**i i§3A 7:37 1: 21-116-22-24-0007 Zachman Homes Sandy Pointe L5 82 16,463.08 ( 21-116-22-24-0008 Zachman Homes Sandy Pointe L6 82 16,463.08 21-116-22-24-0009 Zachnum Homes Sandy Pointe LIO B2 16,463.07 8. LC. 52-203 Street and Utilities on Staring Lane and Ridge Road Project Cost: $ 892,499.61 City Share: $2,094.3311_ot a 39 Lots $ 81,678.79 Lateral Sewer =- S 3,434.40 Lot Unit Lateral Water = $ 2,196.63 Lot Unit Net Assessment: $ 810,820.82 Streets/Drainage $ 11,463.30 Lot Unit Total = $ 17,094.33 Lot Unit 20 Years at 8.0 % Parcel P1D# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred $Amount 1997 $Amount 1992 $Amount 21-116-22-42-0001 Jesse Lee Schwartz Unplatted 17,094.33 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0002 James L. Peterson Unplatted — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0003 Douglas Grindstaff Unplatted — 4,941.14 10 058.86 21-116-22-42-0004 Raymond Campbell Unplatted — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0005 Gayle Olson Unplatted --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0006 Ward Olson Unplatted -- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0007 Wendell T. Owens Unplatted — 4,941 14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0008 Douglas T. Olson Unplatted --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0009 Stephen J. Herbst Unplatted — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0010 William Hargens Unplatted 34,188.66 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2242-0013 Jerome T. Krebsbach Unplatted -- 4,94L14 10,058.86 21-116-2242-0016 William D. Gloede Unplatted --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0018 Ronald E. °stir= Unplatted --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2242-0019 Timothy Banker Unplatted --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0020 Dean Olson Unplatted -- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0021 Roger Bloom Brace's Bit LIB1 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0022 Roger Bloom Brace's Bit L2B1 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0023 Carl N. Hartell Brace's Bit L3B1 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0024 Gerald Schwankl Brace's Bit L48I --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0025 John D. Butz Unplatted --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0027 Paul Edwardson Starring Pines LIB1 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0028 Robert Veatch Starring Pines L2B1 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0029 Charles Ross Starring Pines L3B1 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0030 Steven Pederson Gopher Lane LIB1 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 , 21-116-22-42-0031 Martin Wyatt Gopher Lane L201 --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0032 Patrick Bauer Gopher Lane L3B1 -0- 17 094.33 21-116-22-42-0033 Melvin Hansen Mel Hanson Add LI ill --- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0034 Michael Diem Mel Hanson Add L2BI -- -0- 17,094.33 21-116-22-42-0037 Brian Nichols D.Swanson Add. LI B1 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0038 Allan Ulsby D.Swanson Add. L2 131 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-42-0039* Brian Ohland Starring HighIds LID! — 4- 34,188.66 ' i 21-116-22-42-0040 011mda Fiore Starring Highlds us1 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 ' 21-116-22-43-0005 Daniel Mobs Unplatted 34,188.66 -0- -0- 21-116-22-43-0006 Geotge J. Adelmatut Starring Lake 1st LIB1 — 3,434.40 I 1,719.50 21-116-22-43-0007 Donald J. Elder Starring Lake 1st L2B1 — 3,434.40 I -0- 21-116-22-43-0008 James Kessler Starring Lake 1st L3B1 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-2243-0010 Henry Guenther Starring Lake 1st LIB2 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0011 Jerome Johnson Starring Lake 1st L2B2 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-22-43-0012 Roy Jaszczak Starring Lake 1st L3B2 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0013 David Aukes Starring Lake 1st L482 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0014 Gordon Nix Starring Lake 1st L5B2 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0015 James E. Waklack Starring Lake 1st L682 — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0016 Sibert A. Holmquist Starring Lake 1st L7112 . 17,094.33 4,941.14 10.058.86 . 23 ,116.422-14400 ' ...... .. Celli:Tau ,snarogtai&i.fal L€132 .,.., -0- .:L15-3;90.. , 2l-116-22-43-0018 Daniel Zimmerman Starring Lake 1st L9B2 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-2243-0019 Robert C. Nagel Starring Lake lot LIOB2 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-22-43-0020 Catherine Nelson Starring Lake 1st LI1B2 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-22-43-0021 Ronald L. Fisher Starring Lake 1st L12B2 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-22-43-0022 Edward L Fisher, Jr. Starring Lake 1st L13B2 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-22-43-0023 Allen Schoff Starring Lake 1st L14B2 — 3,434.40 -0- 21-116-22-43-0025 LeRoy Heitz Unplatted — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0027 Daniel Lindholm Unplatted -- 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0028 Craig Abraham Unplatted — 4,941.14 10,058.86 21-116-2243-0031 Cliff Anderson III Starring Hghlds L381 -- 4,941.09 10,058.91 9. LC. 52-205 Project Cost: City Share: Net Assessment: 20 Years at 8 % $ 763,150.71 $6,246.99/Lots x 20 = $ 124,939.60 $ 638,211.11 Utilities and street improvements on Sunrise Circle East and West. Oudot Storm Sewer $ 1,263.62 Lot Unit Lateral Sewer $ 5,024.48 Lot Unit Lateral Water $ 2,906.09 Lot Unit Streets $12,052.80 Lot Unit Total $21,246.99 Lot Unit Parcel P1D# Property Owner - Legal Description Deferred $Amount - 1997 $Amount 1992 $Amount 21-116-22-24-0002 Robert Mason Homes Outlot D, Boulder Pte — -- 90,969.93 21-116-22-31-0004 Steven Dunswortb Unplatted — 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0005 Shirley Larson Unplattect 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0006 Gregory Warner Unplatted 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0007 Scott Calahan Unplatted -- 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0008 Linda Wallenberg Unplattecl 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0009 Shirley Larson Unplatted 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0011 John Sullivan Unplatted 21,246.99 5,598.84 9.401.16 21-116-22-31-0012 Harvey Schmidt Unplatted 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0013 Lars Christianson Unplatted --- 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0014 Lois Tobias Unplatted 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0015 John Frye Unplutted --- 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0016 Charles Steffens Unplatted ..... 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0017 Edward Korbel Unplatted --- 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0018 Gregory Hart Unplatted --- 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0019 Robert Mjolsness Unplatted 18,864.30 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0020 Merle Bamaal Eickholts LIBI 5,598.84 9.401.16 21-116-22-31-0021 Daniel Fiedler Eickholts L2B1 --- 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0022 James Osekowsky Eickholts L3B1 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-31-0023 Louie Wiebold Eickholts 1481 --- 5,598.80 9.401.20 21-116-22-31-0024 Kriss Eicholt Eickholts L5B1 --- 5,024.48 1,263.62 21-116-22-31-0025 Marcia Eicholt Eickholts L6B1 --- 5,024.48 1,263.62 21-116-22-31-0026 Chris Brandvold Eickholts L7B1 --- --- 8,110.88 21-116-22-31-0029 Dowain LaCourse Unplatted 21,246.99 5,598.84 9,401.16 21-116-22-42-0023 Carl Hartell Brace's Bit 1381 12.576.20 --- --- 21-116-22-42-0024 Gerald Schwankl Brace's Bit L4B1 25,137.58 --- -- ) 10. I.C. 52-212 Street Improvements and Utilities in Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane Platted Unplatted Lateral Sewer $ 4,566.48/Lot Unit - $31.94 Fr.Ft. Lateral Water $ 4,354.31/Lot Unit - $29.44 Fr.Ft. Streets/Drainage $ 9,996.79/Lot Unit - $67.58 Fr.Ft. Total S18,917.58/Lot Unit Project Cost: City Share: S3,917.58/La x 29 Lots Net Assessment: 20 Years at 8.0% $ 664,076.95 $ 113,609.82 $ 550,467.13 Parcel PIDN Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 1997 1992 SAmount SAmount SAmount 20-116-22-14-0005 21-116-22-23-0001 James Meidinger Alvin Krause Eden Hills tat LIOB2 Eden Hills 1st LIB1 Eden Hills 1st L2B1 7,073.41 7,926.59 7,073.41 7,926.59 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0002 B & N Hovey 21-116-22-23-0003 L& L Lemon Eden Hills 1st L331 4,566.48 21-116-22-23-0004 K. Lindeman Eden Hills 1st L4B1 7,073.41 7,926.59 •Ifl I 21416-22-23-000S Randy Rannow Eden Hills 1st L182 13,917311 . 21-116-n-23-0006 Randy Rartnow Ealen Hills 1st L232: 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0007 James Duvick Eden Hills 1st L3B2 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0008 M & B Woolsey Eden Hills 1st L4B2 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0009 R & G Gibson Eden Hills 1st L5B2 7,073,41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0010 R. Neidenfeuhr Eden Hills 1st L6B2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0011 Benedict Olk Eden Hills 1st L782 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0012 E. Van Rossum Eden Hills 1st L8B2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0013 0 Kube/JK Harderwijk Eden Hills 1st L9B2 -- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0014 Robert Arp Eden Hills 1st LI IB2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0015 C & S Turtle Eden Hills 1st Ll2B2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0016 B & G Martin Eden Hills 1st L13B2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0017 Floyd Hagen Eden Hills 1st Ll4B2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0018 F McMahon Eden hills 1st LI5132 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0019 M & P Junck Eden Hills 1st L16132 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0020 Robert Gartner Eden Hills 1st L1 7 132 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0021 R & V O'Brien Eden Hills 1st L18B2 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0022 K & P Barker Eden Hills 1st L19132 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0023 R & J Kratz _ Eden Hills 1st l20132 --- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0024 A & S Rosenthal Eden Hills let L2132 7,073.41 7,926.5' 21-116-22-23-0025 Thomas Schroer Eden Hills 1st L2282 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-11 6-22-23-0026 A & 1 Jarman I Eden Hills 1st L2332 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0027 Allan Larson Eden Hills 1st L2482 -- 7,073.41 7,926.59 I 21-116-22-23-0028 Gordon Fox Eden Hills 1st L25B2 — 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-23-0029 Kenneth Fricke Eden Hills 1st L26B2 -- 7,073.41 7,926.59 21-116-22-32-0002 J & A Nagel Unplatted — - 0 - 38,689.58 21-116-22-32-0003 M. McGraw Unplatted 14,402.88 7,139.42 7,860.88 21-116-22-32-0005 E. Hone, Jr. Unplatted — - 0 - 42.807.89 11. SUPPLEMENTALS Trunk Sewer 8c Water Parcel PID# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 1 SAmount , 02-116-22-23-0006 7,290.00 03-116-22-14-0005 10,744.00 05-116-22-21-0007 Country Glen 2nd Add. 8,000.00 05-116-22-21-0010 Country Glen 2nd Add. 8,110.00 17-116-22-23-0003 Shores of Mitchell Lake 53,940.00 18-116-22-11-0005 Shores of Mitchell Lake 213,09000 18-116-22-11-0007 14,770.00 18-116-22-12-0001 Jamestown 182,370.00 20-116-22-11-0003 --- 300.00 — 20-116-22-11-0006 -- -- 300.00 20-116-22-11-0007 -- 520.00 — 20-116-22-11-0011 300.00 — 20-116-22-11-0012 -- 520.00 — 20-116-22-11-0015 — 520.00 — 20-116-22-11-0016 --- 520.00 — 20-116-22-14-0005 --- 520.00 — 20-116-22-42-0001 Cedar Ridge Est 2nd 520.00 20-116-22-42-0006 Cedar Ridge Est 2nd 66,270.00 21-116-22-22-0002 --- 520.00 — 21 -116 -22 -22 -0004 -- — 1,019.00 1 21-116-22-22-0005 -- 520.00 — 21-116-22-22-0010 --- 520.00 — 21-116-22-22-0011 -- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-22-0013 --- 520.00 — 21 -116-22-22 -0014 520.00 21-116-22-22-0015 --- --- 520.00 21-116-22-22-0016 --- --- 520.00 21-116-22-22-0020 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-22-0021 520.00 --- 21-116-22-22-0022 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-22-0023 --- --- 1,574.00 21-116-22-22-0024 --- --- 520.00 21-116-22-22-0026 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-22-0027 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0028 - 520.00 -- 21-116-22-22-0030 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0032 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0033 --- -- 1,530.00 21-116-22-22-0034 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0035 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0036 -- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-22-0037 - - 520.00 21-116-22-22-0039 - - 520.00 21-116-22-22-0040 -- - 520.00 21-116-22-22-0041 --- 520.00 - 1 21-116-22-22-0042 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0044 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-22-0051 --- --- 1,140.00 21-116-22-22-0053 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-22-0055 -- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-22-0056 --- - 520.00 21-116-22-23-0001 -- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-23-0002 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0003 --- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-23-0004 - 520.00 --- 21-116-22-23-0005 - -- 520.00 21-116-22-23-0006 -- - 520.00 21-116-22-23-0007 --- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-23-0008 -- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-23-0009 - 520.00 -- 21-116-22-23-0010 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0011 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0012 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-23-0014 520.00 -- 21-116-22-23-0016 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-23-0017 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-23-0018 --- 520.00 -- - 21-116-22-23-0020 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0021 - 520.00 - tl 21-116-22-23-0022 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0023 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0024 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0025 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0027 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-23-0029 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0005 4,080.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0006 2.280.00 - - 21-116-22-31-0007 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0008 1,620.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0009 1,950.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0011 1,620.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0012 1.620.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0013 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0014 1,620.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0016 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0018 - 520.00 --- 21-116-22-31-0019 7,950.00 520.00 --- 21-116-22-31-0020 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0021 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-31-0023 -- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-31-0024 --- 300.00 - 21-116-22-31-0025 - 300.00 - 21-116-22-31-0026 --- 300.00 21-116-22-31-0029 4,140.00 520.00 -- 21-116-22-32-0002 20,280.00 21-116-22-32-0003 26,940.00 300.00 -- 21-116-22-32-0005 56,190.00 21-116-22-42-0001 2,880.00 520.00 --- 21-116-22-42-0002 --- 520.00 .-- 21-116-22-42-0003 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-42-0004 520.00 -.- 21-116-22-42-0005 --- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-42-0006 --- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-42-0007 --- 520.00 --- 21-116-22-42-0008 - 520.00 - ,0( 21-116-22-42-0009 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0010 9,900.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0013 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0018 - 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0021 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0022 3,410.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0023 6,300.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0024 13,200.00 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0025 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0027 --- 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0029 - 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0030 - 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0031 - 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0032 Gopher Lane Add. --- -- 1,800.00 21-116-22-42-0033 --- 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0034 -- 2.010.00 21-116-22-42-0037 - 520.00 - 21-116-2242-0038 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-42-0039 Starring Highlands - -- 3,030.00 21-116-2242-0040 -- 520.00 - 21-116-2243-0005 5,700.00 -- - 21-116-22-43-0006 - 520.00 - 21-116-22-43-0008 -- 300.00 - 21-116-2243-0010 - 520.00 -- 21-116-2243-0012 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-43-0014 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-43-0015 -- 520.00 -- 21-116-2243-0016 1,590.00 520.00 --- 21-116-22-43-0017 --- - 2,640.00 21-116-22-43-0018 --- 520.00 - 21-116-22-43-0020 --- 300.00 .- 21-116-22-43-0021 --- 520.00 -- 21-116-22-43-0022 -- 300.00 .- 21-116-22-43-0023 --- 300.00 -.- 21-116-22-43-0025 -- 520.00 - 21-116-22-43-0028 - 520.00 - I 21-116-22-43-0031 520.00 22-166-22-23-0004 1 Guille 2nd Addition 2,910.00 23-116-22-43-0004 520.00 36-116-22-23-0004 Bell Oaks Estates 40,000.00 36-116-22-32-0003 Bell Oaks Estates 30,000.00 Subtrunk Parcel P1D# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SAmount 18-116-22-12-0001 _ 35,277.00 Weedfrall GrassCutting Parcel P1D# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SAmount 03-116-22-24-0003 40.00 03-116-22-24-0005 40.00 03-116-22-24-0006 40.00 03-116-22-33-0035 40.00 04-116-22-22-0003 40.00 04-116-22-44-0011 35.00 05-116-22-23-0017 40.00 06-116-22-22-0119 40.00 ' 06-116-22-22-0120 40.00 06-116-22-22-0122 40M0 07-116-22-21-0035 80.00 07-116-22-41-0055 35.00 17-116-22-13-0006 75.00 17-116-22-13-0008 75.00 17-116-22-13-0101 35.00 17-116-22-13-0106 35.00 17-116-22-13-0107 35.00 - 17-116-22-21-0030 75.00 17-116-22-24-0027 35.00 21-116-22-32-0004 40.00 23-116-22-24-0107 40.00 25-116-22-22-0003 45.00 25-116-22-23-0023 40.00 25-116-22-31-0075 135.00 25-116-22-31-0078 40.00 7,0 26-116-22-11-0076 45.00 26-116-22-11-0019 45.00 ' 26-116-22-11-0028 40.00 i 26-116-22-11-0054 40.00 26-116-22-1 I -0061 40.00 26-116-22-11-0062 40.00 35-116-22-12-0032 40.00 35-116-22-12-0033 40.00 , 1 Trunk Sewer & Water Exclusion Parcel RD/ Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 , SAmount 21-116-22-43-0022 220.00 25-116-22-32-0040 520.00 36-116-22-13-0018 .------ 520.00 Lateral Sewer & Water Exclusion Parcel PID/I Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SAmount 03-116-22-12-0441 7,364.10 21-116-22-43-0022 1,963.09 1 22-116-22-23-0004 4,707.16 25-116-22-32-0040 6,069.29 . . . ... s „. ....... 26-1164z41037 , .',4•492.8i;; Subtrunk Exclusion Parcel P1D8 Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SArnount 36-116-22-13-0018 161.97 Tax Forfeiture Parcel PID/r Property Owner Legal Description Deferred SAmount 1997 SAmount 1992 SArnount 05-116-22-21-0037 16,215.29 AL'S' MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: October 29, 1991 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Auto Center - Planning Commission Recommendation and Outstanding Issues PLANNING CO SSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Eden Prairie Auto Center on October 7, 1991, based on the following conditions: 1. Five waivers were granted through the Planned Unit Development District Review to permit taller and larger signs than what the City Code would permit. This sign plan includes: a. Four 23 foot high, 80 square foot pylon signs on Plaza Drive. b. One 320 square foot, 7 foot high monument sign on the berm. c. Use of the existing Factory Outlet Center sign, 58 feet high and 252 square feet. d. Twelve 50 square foot signs on four towers on the building. e. One hundred ninety-five square feet of logo wall signs. f. Three hundred twenty square feet of wall signs. 2. The foot candle lighting plan shall be no greater than 40 foot candles in the main portion of the parking lot. This was predicated on reducing the height of the proposed lighting standards from 30' to 24'. The lighting plan has been revised to meet this recommendation. All lighting will be straight downcast luminars. 3. The number of flags to be displayed on the property shall be limited to three flags with a maximum height of 65'. 1`; Memorandum Eden Prairie Auto Center October 29, 1991 4. Only one grand opening shall be permitted. This consistent with City Code. 5. An irrigation system shall be used considering the number of plant materials proposed on the project. The proponent has agreed to extend the existing irrigation system to cover the additional plantings and proposed berm on the property. 6. The exterior materials for the building additions shall be face brick, stucco, glass and metal panel. A sample board showing the colors for the brick, stucco and metal panel will be available for review at the City Council meeting. The brick is a similar color to match the existing brick on the Factory Outlet Center building. The stucco will be a light tan and the metal panel color will be beige. OUTSTANDING ISSUES The approval for sign waivers from City Code was predicated upon providing construction details for all signs and continuity between the free-standing pylon signs. Information has been provided which shows construction details for signs to be located on the building. No construction details have been provided for the pylon signs which include the following: I. Four, 23 foot high, 80 square foot pylon signs on Plaza Drive. 2. One, 320 square foot, 7 foot high, monument sign on the proposed berm. 3. The existing Factory Outlet Center sign, 58 feet high, and 252 square feet. Staff would recommend a common design for all of these signs including materials, colors, and shape. Because of their close proximity, the four pylon signs on Plaza Drive should have a common brick base, single pole, and rectangular shape for the sign. The 80 square foot sign area provides flexibility for different types of logos and letter styles for different car dealerships. This is a similar approach to the Edenvale Crossings project for three pylon signs on one street frontage, but with the stipulation for a common brick base, single pole, and rectangular shape of the sign. The proponent has agreed to incorporate the circle watermark design for the City's downtown area (which will appear on the Walmart and Cub Foods Store) for the monument sign and the Factory Outlet Center sign; howevec no design has been submitted. Since these signs are highly 2 ‘2.3LI Memorandum Eden Prairie Auto Center October 29, 1991 visible from Highway 494 and Highway 5 at an entry site to the community, the design of the sign is an important part of the project. Staff would recommend that the design and construction details for all pylon and monument signs be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to 2nd Reading. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the project based on the Staff Reports dated October 4, 1991, and October 29, 1991, based on revised plans dated October 28, 1991. MOEPAC.MDF:bs 3 1. Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres for the development of a 158,800 square foot automobile dealership. 17\1.\`74 fI T.113 R.22 --------------- AO, , PITL .. . - --- - • - \.! . • ,C,',',.(1`.;;;, , STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: October 31, 1991 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Auto Center APPLICANT: Accent Realty FEE OWNER: Travelers Insurance Company LOCATION: Southeast corner of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive REQUEST: I. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 16.2 acres with waivers. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the existing C-Reg-Serv District on 16.2 acres. BACKGROUND This site is currently guided Regional Commercial and zoned C-Reg-Serv according to a specific site plan for the Factory Outlet Center. The existing building has been vacant for approximately five years. Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 2 PUD CONCEPT The proponent is requesting a PUD Concept Review and PUD District Review with waivers to construct a multi-dealership auto plaza within the existing Factory Outlet Center building. In order to accommodate the plan as proposed, the following waivers will be necessary through the Planned Unit Development District Review process: 1. Increase in base area ratio from .20 to .22. 2. Waiver for outdoor display in excess of 10% of the building area. 3. Waiver for parking setbacks from 171/2 feet to 10 feet, and from 35 feet to 15 feet. 4. Sign waivers for height, number, and square footage. With the development of the property, the City is faced with three major issues. The first issue would be the land use decision as to the appropriateness of an automobile dealership on this site. The second issue would be to determine the impact of the proposed use on-site and the surrounding areas and to identify mitigating measures. The third issue would be to determine if the waivers from the City code are justified, and if the plan, as proposed, with waivers is a better plan for the City than if no waivers were considered at all. Each of these issues will be discussed in detail in subsequent sections; however, it is important to consider these issues collectively as a Planned Unit Development. The development of the property is negotiated between the developer and the City. The City should consider land use, development impacts and waivers and weigh them against the benefits of the devleopment. LAND USE The surrounding area has developed with uses that require relatively large sites which attract little or no pedestrian traffic and are regional scale uses. This site is not adjacent to any public open space or natural areas which would be adversely impacted by views of large outdoor sales and storage areas. This site, however, is immediately adjacent to the Topview Acres residential area which would have some views down on the project. IMPACTS Visibility of outdoor display and storage area, lighting, and signs are three items that will have an impact on the surrounding uses. Mitigation for visibility of outdoor display and storage would be the building, additional landscaping, and topography which blocks sight lines into the project and the construction of a large berm in the parking lot area. The impacts of lighting can be mitigated by topography, berms, additional landscaping, and existing buildings which can minimize views of intense lighting from adjacent roads and the residential areas to the north with the provision that lighting standards be no higher than 20 feet high. ,Rso Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 3 Signs will have a visual impact. The City must consider tradeoffs for permitting the continued use of the existing free-standing Outlet Center sign as well as a large advertising sign on a berm which faces 494. OU I • OR SALES AND DISPLAY A waiver through the Planned Unit Development District Review from zoning regulations Section 11.03, J, 2. to permit more than 10% outdoor sales and display and storage is requested. Since this building is 158,800 square feet, the code would permit a display area of 10% or 15,800 square feet. On the site plan, this display area would be between the berm and the Highway 5 off ramp and would accommodate approximately 150 new cars. The City code permits waivers to be granted through the Planned Unit Development District Review if it encourages a better design than if no waivers were granted, or if there are tradeoffs which would be beneficial to the City. A reasonable tradeoff would be to screen the majority of the outdoor sales and display and allow some cars to be highlighted for display. The building, 11/2 acre of 10' high berm, and mass plantings are proposed to screen the majority of the views. The front portion of the site along Plaza Drive would be screened with normal City requirements for screening of parking areas including berming and plantings. The area in the northwest corner of the site in the Topview Acres neighborhood would be screened with large conifer plantings. SIGNS The proponent is requesting five sign waivers through the Planned Unit Development District Review. Waivers through a PUD District review are considered on the basis of whether the waiver results in a better plan or benefit to the City than if no waivers are granted. The City code would permit one, 80 square foot, 20 foot high pylon sign on one street frontage and a 36 square foot pylon sign on the other three street frontages. In addition, based upon the size of wall areas, a total of 2417 square feet of wall signs is permitted. In addition to the five requested sign waivers, the wall signs (which are permitted according to City code) would be displayed on four towers, which are forty feet in height. Each of these towers contains three signs for a total of 12 signs. While technically these signs are permitted according to Code, considering the spirit and intent of the code, these signs could be considered as roof signs (staff will be working on a sign code revision to correct this "loophole" in the ordinance). The sign request could be characterized as having too many signs (10 pylon or wall signs), signs that are too tall (23 and 58 feet high), and too much total square footage (2007 square feet). The following chart compares the code requirement, the proponent's request and the staff recommendation for signs. (QC 0\J I Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 4 `1YPE OF SIGN CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS PROPONENT'S REQUEST STAFF RECOMMENDATION FREE- STANDING SIGNS PER STREET FRONTAGE One sign per street frontage {1, 80 sq. ft., 20 ft. high) (3, 36 sq. ft., 20 ft. high) Four pylon signs on Plaza Drive Four monument signs on Plaza Drive One monument sign on the berm one monument sign on the berm Existing Factory Outlet Center sign on 494 Existing Factory Outlet Center sign on 494 SIGN HEIGHT 20 foot maximum 4 (23 ft high) pylon signs 4 (6 ft high) monument signs on Plaza Drive. one (58 ft high) current Factory Outlet sign 1 (58 ft high) current Factory Outlet sign; 1 (7 ft high) monument sign on berm 1 (7 ft high) monument sign on berm MAXIMUM FREE- STANDING PYLON SIGN 80 sq. ft. 1 (252 sq. ft.) Outlet Center sign 1 (252 sq. ft.) Outlet Center sign 4 (80 sq. ft.) pylon signs on Plaza Drive 4 (36 sq. ft.) monument signs on Plaza Drive 1 (320 sq. ft.) monument sign 1 (300 sq. ft.) monument sign DISTANCE BETWEEN FREE- STANDING SIGNS 300 feet 25 feet 25 feet TOTAL FREE- STANDING SIGNS PERMITTED 3 4 pylon signs, 1 Outlet Center sign, 1 monument sign 1 Outlet Center sign, 1 monument sign on berm, and 4 monument signs on Plaza Drive This site is prominent in its relationship to major highways in the community. The appearance of this site will leave a lasting impression for a large number of people driving by this site on adjoining highways. The opportunity exists to allow for identity and visibility for the auto dealership while providing a positive and quality image for the community. The large berm and monument sign (which also serves as a screen wall for the outdoor storage area), and the existing Factory Outlet Center sign can be gateway features to the community. These signs could be designed to incorporate the "circle watermark" which would help this site fit in with the City's downtown architectural framework. The proponent has agreed to this. The City could consider allocating the total square footage of signs permitted (2665 square feet) between wall signs, monument signs and pylon signs, but care must be taken not to transfer all or the majority of wall signs allowed just to create larger and taller free-standing signs. Wall signs are proportionate to the wall of the building. The reason for the size of the sign changes when they become free-standing and don't have the backdrop of the building to provide scale and Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 5 are moved closer to the street. A reasonable approach might be to transfer some of the square footage of wall signs off the building to other pylon and monument signs provided that the total square footage of signs is less than what the ordinance would permit. This would establish an unique set of circumstances which may be difficult to repeat on other commercial sites. The chart below indicates the square footage allocation comparing code requirements, the proponent's request and the staff recommendation: TYPE OF SIGN ,.. . CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS PROPONENT'S REQUEST • STAFF RECOMMENDATION PYLON. MONUMENT 188 -62 696 WALL TOWER 2,477 600 400 LOGO 195 195 WALL 320 320 TOTAL 2,665 2.007 1,615 BANNERS. FLAGS. AND WHIRLING DEVICES Long term enforcement of day-to-day activities of an auto dealership will be difficult through City codes. We could expect that the dealership could operate according to the industry standards in spite of City code. The industry standard in adjoining communities is whirling devices, extensive use of flags and banners, temporary signs, spotlights, rooftop balloons, and helium balloons tethered with 200' of pennants. To control the auto dealership exactly as proposed and keep it from operating in a way standard to the industry could be difficult and ineffective over time. Auto dealerships often utilize a heavy display of the American flag. The display of the American flag is regulated through the United States Congress and that cities, through state enabling zoning regulation, have the authority to prohibit or regulate the use and display of the American flag. The City ordinance does not permit banners, ordinances or other whirling devices or balloons except during grand openings. No other portable signs, lights changing colors or intensities, or rotating or moving signs are permitted. Window signs cannot occupy more than 10% of the window area. No rooftop signs are permitted. The Developer's Agreement for Eden Prairie Ford contains restrictions regulating the number of flags on the property, limiting them to three flags with a height restriction of 65 feet. There is also a condition in the Developer's Agreement where balloons, banners, pennants, ribbon streamers, whirling devices, temporary signs, searchlights, motion signs, portable signs or projecting signs would not be permitted except for grand openings. These conditions are applicable to the project and should be made a condition of approval. )35? Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 6 LIGHTING The lighting plan indicates up to forty footcandles in the c e n t e r o f t h e p a r k i n g l o t . T h i s i s f o u r times as intense as the Ford project which was restricte d t o a m a x i m u m o f t e n f o o t c a n d l e s . There are certain mitigating circumstances which exist on t h i s p r o p e r t y w h i c h a r e u n i q u e w h i c h may provide a rationale for considering forty footcandles. T h i s p r o p e r t y s i t s a t a l o w e r e l e v a t i o n than Valley View Road and 494 which makes a porti o n o f t h e p a r k i n g l o t l e s s v i s i b l e . I n addition, the existing building is also effective in blockin g s i g h t l i n e s f r o m t h e T o p v i e w a r e a t o the north. A 11/2 acre berm up to 90' in width and 10' in h e i g h t i n t h e c e n t e r o f t h e p a r k i n g l o t also screens views from Highways 5 and 494. Thes e e l e m e n t s s u r r o u n d t h e a r e a o f f o r t y footcandles. In addition, all lighting on the property wh i c h i s i n e x c e s s o f t h r e e f o o t c a n d l e s should be 20' in height or less. The existing 34' high lig h t i n g p o l e s a r e v i s i b l e a b o v e t h e r o o f line when viewed from the Topview Acres neighborhoo d . I f t h e l i g h t i n g s t a n d a r d s a r e r e d u c e d in height to 20', the glare of the lights would not be visi b l e . Forty footcandles are proposed for a future used car area i n t h e n o r t h w e s t c o r n e r o f t h e p r o p e r t y facing the Topview Acres neighborhood. This parking l o t l i g h t i n g s h a l l be limited to three footcandles at this time since the screening of higher i n t e n s i t y l i g h t i n g w o u l d h a v e t o r e l y exclusively on plant materials. The City could reevaluat e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f a h i g h e r f o o t c a n d l e intensity after the dealership was operating. The intensity o f l i g h t i n g a n d s c r e e n i n g o n t h e s o u t h side of the building (40 footcandles) would provide a vi s u a l e x a m p l e t o b e u s e d a s a b a s i s f o r change of light intensity in the northwest corner. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE There will be some modifications to the existing buil d i n g t o c r e a t e a p l a z a o n t h e s o u t h e a s t elevation as well as to raise the roof in two locations to 2 0 ' i n o r d e r t o p r o v i d e f o r a u t o m o b i l e servicing. Exterior materials proposed for the expansion w o u l d b e f a c e b r i c k ; h o w e v e r , a l i g h t e r color stucco and metal panel would be introduced. The p r o p o n e n t s h a v e n o t i d e n t i f i e d a c o l o r scheme for these materials. SITE PLAN The parking setback waivers along Plaza Drive and Val l e y V i e w R o a d a r e e x i s t i n g c o n d i t i o n s and were previously approved with the Factory Outl e t C e n t e r . T h e s e t b a c k w a i v e r a l o n g Highway 5 is the result of transferring 71/2 feet to the b e r m i n t h e p a r k i n g l o t . T h i s r a i s e s t h e berm two feet which helps screen the majority of the c a r s . I n a d d i t i o n , i t i s n o t p h y s i c a l l y possible to screen cars along Highway 5 due to grade chan g e s a n d t h e p o w e r l i n e e a s e m e n t . T h i s area is also the location of 10% outdoor display which do e s n o t r e q u i r e s c r e e n i n g . GRADING A minimal amount of site grading will occur on the property. This will be confi n e d t o t h e construction of the 11/2 acre berm within the parking lo t . F i l l w i l l h a v e t o b e i m p o r t e d t o c r e a t e this berm area. Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 7 UTILITIES This site is served by existing utilities for sewer, water, and storm sewer. A portion of the watermain will have to be relocated in order to accommodate the building expansion. The proponent will be required to provide detailed as-built drawings for review by the Engineering Department for the relocation of the watennain. IANDSCAPING All of the existing dead plant materials on the property will be removed. There are approximately 25 spruce trees along Plaza Drive which will be retained. Approximately 45 existing ash trees will be relocated from planting islands in the parking lot elsewhere on the property. There will be additional and large plant materials proposed to be located along the berm area in the parking lot and especially in the northwest corner of the site adjacent to Valley View Road to help block views from the Topview Acres neighborhood to the north. The amount of landscaping required for this project is 608 caliper inches. The landscape plan depicts 608 inches. Since the site relies heavily on berming and landscaping to screen the outdoor sales and display, an irrigation system is recommended for the project. There is an existing irrigation system on the property. The proponent has indicated they will expand this system to cover the areas proposed for new berming and plant materials. SIDEWALKS There is an existing sidewalk along Valley View Road and Plaza Drive. CONCLUSION The Planning Commission should first consider the appropriateness of the land use in this portion of the community. This site can be suited for outdoor sales and display. The surrounding area has developed with uses which require relatively large sites which attract little or no pedestrian traffic and are regional sales uses. Menard's has a large outdoor display area which was granted a variance but required a screen with a fence and plantings. If the answer to the land use question is a qualified "yes", the City should decide whether the impacts of a large outdoor storage and display area, signs, and lighting are mitigated. Whether the site develops with outdoor display is dependent upon the site plan in mitigating the impacts of a large amount of outdoor sales and display. The existing building, proposed berming, landscaping, and the fact that the site sits at a lower elevation than some of the surrounding roadways can he mitigation for the outdoor display area. The sign waivers to permit taller and larger signs, the use of the existing Outlet Center sign and monument sign on the berm within the parking lot could be considered based on recommendations in the sign section which limits total sign square footage to approximately 50% of what would be possible according to the ordinance. This must also include provisions for continuity in terms of construction details for the signs including color, letter style, and lighting. This would create a set of unique circumstances which may not be able to be duplicated on other ;243 09 Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 8 commercial sites in the community. At the same time, the City could benefit if the signs are designed with elements of the downtown area for incorporation of a watermark. This would create an identity at this visible location along Highways 494 and 5. (See staff sign recommendation attachment.) The intensity of forty footcandles can be mitigated by existing topography, existing building, and large berm in the parking lot which shields the majority of views with the exception of the area along Plaza Drive. At this time, the proponent has not indicated whether they concur with the recommendations identified in the staff report which are as follows: I. Limiting the number, height, and size of signs. 2. Limiting the height of lighting standards to 20' high downcast, cut-off luminars. Limiting footcandle rating in the northwest corner to three footcandles. 3. Limiting the number of flags which may be displayed on the property. 4. Limiting the use of balloons, whirling devices, searchlights, etc. to the code requirement to grand openings only. In addition, in order to provide a more detailed recommendation, the following information is needed: 1. A detailed footcandle lighting plan which indicates the number of lighting standards and intensities on a grid system across the entire property. 2. Construction details for all signs indicating materials, colors, and whether they are individually lit or are internally lit cans. 3. Samples of exterior materials and colors. $TAFF RECOMMENDATIONS If the Planning Commission is comfortable with an automobile dealership land use for the property and that the impacts of outdoor display, signs, and lighting are mitigated, the waivers from the City code have been justified and result in a benefit to the City, then one option would he to recommend approval of the PUD Concept, PUD District Review with waivers, Zoning District Amendment, and Site Plan Review based on plans dated October 4, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report, and subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall: I. Modify the site plan to limit the number, height, and size of signs as indicated in the sign section. Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 9 2. Revise the site plan to limit the height of lighting standards to 20' high downcast, cut-off luminars. Footcandle ratings in the northwest corner of the parking lot shall be limited to three footcandles. 3. Agree to limit the number of flags which may be displayed on the property to three flags, 65' in height. 4. Agree to limiting the use of balloons, whirling devices, searchlights, etc. to the code requirement of grand openings only. 5. Provide a detailed footcandle lighting plan which indicates the number of lighting standards and intensities on a grid system across the entire property. 6. Provide construction details on all signs indicating materials, colors, and whether they are individually lit or internally lit cans. 7. Provide samples of exterior materials for review. 8. Agree to extend the existing irrigation system to cover the additional plantings and berm on-site. B. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Meet with the Fire Marshal and Building Department to discuss fire code and occupancy requirements. 2. Submit a final sign plan with details for review. 3. Submit a final landscape plan and security amount for review. 4. Submit samples of exterior materials for review. C. Planned Unit Development waivers are granted as follows: 1. Front yard setback to parking from 35' to 17.5', from 17.5' to 10'. 2. Increase in base area ratio from .20 to .22. 3. Waiver to allow more than 10% outdoor display. 4. Waiver for increase in sign height from 20' to 58', sign square footage from 80 square feet to 300 square feet, more than one sign per street frontage, and signs closer than 300' apart. H. If the Planning Commission is uncomfortable with the land use as proposed, and that the impacts of outdoor display, lighting, and signs have not been mitigated, and that the waivers are not justified nor have benefits to theCity been clearly identified, then the Staff Report Eden Prairie Auto Center Page 10 Planning Commission may choose to recommend that the development plans be returned to the proponent for revisions as identified in the Staff Report. g,3S7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: October 28, 1991 SUBJECT: Amendments to SECTION 11.40 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONCEPT The City's legal staff have suggested that the PUD regulations be amended to clarify the following: that the 15 acre minimum is for the PUD Concept area, and that subsequent PUD's shall be consistent with the approved PUD Concept. Two Amendments The first amendment occurs on page 315 of the Code and inserts the word "Concept" into Subdivision 6. The second amendment occurs on page 318 of the Code and inserts the words "and shall be consistent with an approved PUD Concept", at the end of the sentence in Subdivision 11. D. Copies of these two Code pages are attached for your information. Also attached is a draft Ordinance, #24-91, which incorporates the two proposed changes. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the Code change on October 7, 1991. PUDAMND.JJ:bs 2Sq Subd. 4. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to: (I) Encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land in the City; (2) Allow variety in the types of environment available to the people of the City; (3) Encourage more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled common open space through the distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible: and, (4) Provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the stnct application of the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 12 (relating to subdivisions) of this Code while at the same time preserving the health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare of the City and its inhabitants. Subd. 5. Designation. All PUD's shall be designated in the legal description of the original district being supplemented. Subd. 6. Minimum Area. A PUD 4m ust include an area of at least 15 acres. Subd. 7. Permitted Uses. The permitted uses set forth in this Chapter pertaining to the original district or districts within a PUD shall apply to and be permitted uses in that part of a PUD in which such a district is encompassed, except as such use or uses may be limited by a development plan, an agreement or imposed by the City as a condition to approval of the PUD. Subd. 8. Zoning and Subdivision Standards and Requirements. All standards and provisions relating to an original district as set forth in this Chapter and to the subdivision of land as set forth in Chapter 12 (if land which is the subject of a PUD is or will be subdivided in connection with a PUD) shall apply to an original district situated within a PUD and to such land subdivided or to be subdivided unless any such standards or requirement has been modified or waived as provided in Subparagraph A and B hereof. A. Any standard or provision, except permitted uses, set forth in this Chapter relating to an original district may be waived or modified by the City provided the ordinance relating to such PUD sets forth specifically or by reference to a development plan or an agreement such modification or waiver. B. Any standard or provision set forth in Chapter 12 relating to the subdivision of land which is the subject of a PUD and is being or will be subdivided in connection with a PUD may be waived or modified as provided in Chapter 12. Subd. 9. Application. An applicant for a PUD shall submit in the application all of the material required by this Chapter for rezoning and if land encompassed within the PUD is to be subdivided, all of the material required by Chapter 12 of this Code relating to the subdivision of land. In addition, an applicant shall submit the following information: A. Project identification. The following and such other information as is necessary to clearly and completely describe the project shall be provided: I. Ownership. Identify all owners legal and equitable of and all encumbrances and easements upon the land within the proposed PUD. 2. Developer. Identify all parties involved in the development, including their previous experience and the nature and extent of their participation. 315 AT,3 notice may use any appropriate records to d e t e r m i n e t h e n a m e s a n d a d d r e s s e s o f o w n e r s . A c o p y of the notice and a list of the owners and a d d r e s s e s t o w h i c h t h e n o t i c e w a s s e n t shall be attested to by the responsible person and shall be m a d e a p a r t o f t h e r e c o r d s o f t h e p r o c e e d i n g s . T h e failure to give mailed notice to individual p r o p e r t y o w n e r s . o r d e f e c t s i n t h e n o t i c e s h a l l n o t invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona f i d e a t t e m p t t o c o m p l y w i t h t h i s S u b d i v i s i o n h a s b e e n made. A. An application for a POD may not be acted u p o n b y t h e C o u n c i l u n t i l i t h a s r e c e i v e d t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n of the Planning Commission or until 60 d a y s h a v e e l a p s e d f r o m t h e d a t e o f r e f e r r a l t o t h e P l a n n i n g Commission. B. In the event land within a PUD is or will b e s u b d i v i d e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h a P O D , s u c h s u b d i v i s i o n pursuant to, or any waiver or modification o f a n y p r o v i s i o n o f . C h a p t e r 1 2 m a y b e a p p r o v e d o n l y u p o n compliance with such additional procedur e s a s a r e s e t f o r t h i n C h a p t e r 1 2 . Subd. 11 Findings Required. The findings necessa r y for approval of a POD shall be as follows: A. The proposed development is not in confli c t w i t h t h e g o a l s o f t h e G u i d e P l a n o f t h e C i t y . B. The proposed development is designed in su c h 3 manner to forms desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. Any exceptions to the standard requiremen t s o f t h i s C h a p t e r a n d C h a p t e r 1 2 o f t h i s C o d e a r e j u s t i f i e d b y the design of the development. D. The POD is of sufficient size, composition, a n d a r r a n g e m e n t t h a t i t s c o n s t r u c t i o n , m a r k e t i n g , a n d o p e r a t i o n is feasible as a complete unit without depen d e n c e u p o n a n y s u b s e q u e n t unit..47leZ ShAti 64 adalt. fitle Suhd. 12. A. Minor changes in the location, placement a n d h e i g h t o f b u i l d i n g s o r s t r u c t u r e s a s w e l l a s o t h e r m a t t e r s s e t forth in the development plan, or any agr e e m e n t , e x c e p t a s d e s c r i b e d i n S u b p a r a g r a p h B b e l o w . m a y b e authorized by the Planning Director if requ i r e d b y e n g i n e e r i n g o r o t h e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s n o t f o r e s e e n a t t h e time the final development plan was appro v e d . B. Changes in uses as well as any modification o r w a i v e r o f a n y s t a n d a r d o r r e q u i r e m e n t r e l a t i n g t o a n o r i g i n a l district or amendment of any waiver or mo d i f i c a t i o n t h e r e o f g r a n t e d in connection with a POD may be made only in accordance with the procedures a p p l i c a b l e t o a m e n d m e n t s o f t h i s C h a p t e r p e r t a i n i n g t o z o n i n g . Changes relating to any standard or requirem e n t s e t forth in Chapter 12 pertaining to the subdivision o f l a n d or amendment of any waiver or modificatio n t h e r e o f g r a n t e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h a P O D m a y b e m a d e o n l y in accordance with the procedures provided in Chapter 12 o f t h i s C o d e p e r t a i n i n g t o s u b d i v i s i o n o f l a n d . SEC. 11.41. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. Subd. 1. Declaration of Policy and Purpose. It is her e b y f o u n d a n d d e c l a r e d t h a t c e r t a i n l a n d s w i t h i n t h e City have been included within and design a t e d a s t h e ' M a j o r Center Area", (MCA), and are the subject of the 'Eden Prairie Major Center Area Planned Unit Develop m e n t ' , ( M C A - P U D I . adopted by the Council on July 10, 1973, as an amendment to the Comprehensive. Guide Plan. Source: Ordinance No. 18-82, Effect i v e Date: 9-17-82 318 Revisions and Amendments. 9,c2( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 24-91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 11.40 ENTITLED "PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT", AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section I. City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 6., is amended to read as follows: Subd. 6. Minimum Area. A PUD Concept must include an area of at least 15 acres. Section 2. City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 11., is amended to read as follows: Subd. 11. Findings Required. The findings necessary for approval of a PUD shall be as follows: A. The proposed development is no: in conflict with the goals of the Guide Plan of the City. B. The proposed development is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of this Chapter and Chapter 12 of this Code are justified by the design of the development. D. The PUD is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing and operation are feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit, and the PUD shall be consistent with an approved PUD concept. Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden P r a i r i e o n t h e day of , 1991 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1991. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Franc, Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1991. 4(3 NOVEMBER 5.1991 19269 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE 19270 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY 19271 JEFFREY CHARNES 3272 DULUTH TECHNICAL COLLEGE 19273 DEB MOLITOR 19274 PETTY CASH 19275 TARGET CENTER 19276 MCPOA 19277 CALIBRE PRESS INC 19278 MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN 19279 MPPOA 19280 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE 19281 JOYCE CONLEY 19282 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING 19283 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 19284 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COU 19285 ST FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTS 19286 SUBURBAN UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT 19287 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN 19288 PETTY CASH 19289 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 19290 KATHLEEN ANDERSON 19291 MARY BERGER 19292 JACALYN BERKELEY 19293 LINDA DAMASIN 1 9294 CINDY GLESSNER 3295 JOHN HAMMOND 19296 CAROLYN KUCERA 19297 NANCY MARTINSON 19298 JUDITH PETERS 19299 LYNN STEVENSON 19300 BENJAMIN & GEORGANA TUDOR 19301 ELAINE UDSTUEN 19302 CARL JULLIE 19303 FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB 19304 KATE GARWOOD 19305 JOSEPH GLEASON 19306 PRAIRIE HARDWARE 19307 ROGERS SERVICE 19308 SELECTIVE SOFTWARE 19309 STEVEN R SINELL 19310 SOFTWARE ETC 19311 DANA GIBBS 19312 MN DEPT OF P/S 19313 HOPKINS POSTMASTER 19314 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 19315 =WOOD INN 19316 HURSTROURNE 9317 MAPA 4432682 OCTOBER 91 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM OCTOBER 91 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM REFUND-UTILITY BILLING CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL EXPENSES-CITY HALL -RINGLING BROS CIRCUS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS/FEES PAID SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT TRAINING VIDEO-POLICE DEFT CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT FUEL TAX LICENSE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID -CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/PLANNING DEPT/ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT CONFERENCE-FIRE DEFT CONFERENCE-UTILITIES DIVISION CONFERENCE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM CHANGE FUND-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR SEPTEMBER 91 SALES TAX REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS -REFUND-GEAR & SHELTER-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM REFUND-BATON TWIRLING LESSONS REFUND-SCUBA DIVING CLASS REFUND-CPR CLASS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS -REFUND-PLANNING THE HUNT-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION PHYSICAL FITNESS PROFILES-POLICE DEFT EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID ROPE/KEYS-POLICE DEPT -ALTERNATORS/ALTERNATOR REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COMPUTER SOFTWARE HANDBOOK-FIRE DEPT SEPTEMBER 91 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT SOFTWARE-CITY HALL SERVICE-PACKET DELIVERY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING -SERVICE-TREATMENT OF EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL AT BRYANT LAKE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 2989.19 2691.83 15.99 165.00 11.19 66.66 32.00 50.00 83.95 15.00 75.00 25.00 50.00 200.00 58.00 112.50 195.00 60.00 12.00 50.00 26193.01 9.00 22.00 40.00 3.00 18.00 129.00 35.00 19.00 18.33 17.00 ; 10.00 11.00 ; 77.43 5599.50 27.42 208.00 27.00 519.75 133.95 561.47 81.0C 16.5( 772.1t 1992.1( 129.3' 502.5( 190.0( 23 10 11 NOVEMBER 5.1991 25.00 105.00 499 .48 68R 17 1275..,:91 50.00 1830.00 564.00 32.00 CENTER 3.00 CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT CONFERENCE-COUNCILMEND3ERS PAYROLL 10/18/91 PAYROLL 10/18/91 CONFERENCE-COUNCILMEMBER/ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT REFUND-SKATING LESSONS -REFUND-GEAR & SHELTER CLASS-OUTDOOR PROGRAM REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-FIRST AID CLASS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE -OKTOBERFEST VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT-FEES PAID REFUND-KARATE LESSONS LABELS/ENVELOPES-CITY HALL CONFERENCE-PUBLIC WORKS DEPT CODE BOOKS-POLICE DEPT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 10/18/91 SER PAYROLL 10/18/91 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION OCTOBER 91 UNION DUES PAYROLL 10/18/91 PAYROLL 10/18/81 NOVEMBER 91 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM NOVEMBER 91 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM PAYROLL 10/18/91 NOVEMBER 91 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM PAYROLL 10/18/91 PAYROLL 10/18/91 PAYROLL 10/18/91 PAYROLL 10/18/81 SAVINGS BOND PAYROLL 10/18/91 RADIO REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3RD QUARTER 91 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT STARING LAKE PARK WATER HOOK UP POSTAGE STAMPS-FIRE DEPT -POSTAGE-NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 91 SENIOR NEWSLETTER-SENIOR PROGRAMS -ENTERTAINMENT-HALLOWEEN PARTY-SOCIAL PROGRAM TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 19338 RICK ATHERTON 19339 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS 19340 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 19341 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSN 19342 AT&T 19343 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV 19344 AT&T 19345 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION 19346 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO 19347 HEWN Cl'? SUPPORT & COLLECTION 19348 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG 19349 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 19350 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 19351 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC 19352 MEDICA CHOICE 19353 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 19354 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA 19355 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA 19356 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR -PERA 19357 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION 19358 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK 19359 UNITED WAY 19360 AUTO-SOUND-ENTRONIX 19361 MINNESOTA UC FUND 19362 TRAVEL PROFESSIONALS 19363 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 19364 HOPKINS POSTMASTER 19365 HOPKINS POSTMASTER 19366 GREG RUSH 19367 GUTHRIE THEATRE 19368 ZURAH TEMPLE 23736044 19318 BURNSVILLE POLICE DEPT 19319 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 19320 SAHARA HOTEL & CASINO 19321 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE 19322 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 19323 METRO CABLE NETWORK 19324 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN 19325 JIM FRANZEN 19326 GRETCHEN OGRE 19327 PAMELA HEDTKE 19328 CYNTHIA MEDLYN 19329 MEGGEN MITCHELL 19330 DONNA NESS 19331 MINNEGASCO 19332 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP 19333 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 19334 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 19335 U S WEST CELLULAR INC 19336 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 19337 EDEN PRAIRIE JAYCEES 34.00 25.00 36.87 5548.51 83.00 14868.00 19992.13 433.01 8729.15 248.00 21.00 565.77 550.00 63.50 311.88 159.80 4,F^ 86 67 6804.00 194.78 1129.00 2458.72 32.00 18391.65 39004.90 50.00 189.00 80.00 33198.96 25.00 200.00 : 215.25 114.36 ' 548.00 238.00 111.00 145.00 133.03, 150.0C 3:14.0C 1 SC g;k1 a J -ENTERTAINMENT-HALLOWEEN PARTY-SOCIAL PROGRAM -DEPOSIT-ENTERTAINMENT FOR HOLIDAY DINNER & NEW YEARS PARTY-SENIOR PROGRAMS WINE LIQUOR WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE WINE WINE ENTERTAINMENT-SENIOR DANCE-SENIOR PROGRAMS CEMENT MIXER RENTAL-DRAINAGE CONTROL SERVICE-1991 CITY STREET STRIPING -TRANSMISSION REBUILT/ALTERNATOR- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -PHEASANT & GROUSE HUNTING INSTRUCTOR- OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM/FEES PAID GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD AIR SWITCH REPLACED-ENGINEERING DEPT -SCOREBOARD CONTROL CONSOLE REPAIR- COMMUNITY CENTER DOOR REPAIR-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING -PAGER SERVICE-BUILDING DEPT/POLICE DEPT/ FIRE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER ICE ARENA INSPECTED-COMMUNITY CENTER BATTERIES/ADAPTER-POLICE & FIRE DEPT BOND PAYMENT SUBSCRIPTION-FORESTRY DEPT -UNIFORMS-BUILDING INSPECTION & FACILITIES DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION VIDEO TAPE-PLANNING DEPT -CPR TEXTBOOKS/RESCUE MANIKIN RENTAL/ TRAINING VIDEO RENTAL-POOL LESSONS PUBLICATION/DUES-UTILITIES DIVISION COLORED PAPER-CITY HALL -STREET SIGN PLATES/DIRECTIONAL SIGN/SWING SEAT-STREET DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEFT EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT -SOLENOID/WIRE CONNECTORS/NOZZLES/RISER/ -VALVE REPAIR/SPRAY HEADS REPLACED- FACILITIES DEPT -FREON WATER CONTENT REMOVAL-ICE ARENA- COMMUNITY CENTER FILM PROCESSING-PLANNING DEPT BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECTOR/BULB-SENIOR PROGRAMS -SCREWDRIVER SET/WRENCHES/HAMMER HANDLE/ -DRILL CHUCK/GREASE HOSE/HAMMER/SOCKET SET- STREET DEPT/WATER DEPT -PILOT/CONTROL FUSES/VOLT REGULATOR/LAMPS! -HIGH SERVICE PUMP REPAIRS/EXIT SIGN NOVEMBER 5.1991 19369 TRICIA HAYNES 9370 JIMMY ALLEN ARTIST MGMT INC i9371 EAGLE WINE CO 19372 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 19373 PRIOR WINE CO 19374 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 19375 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO 19376 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 19377 PAUST1S & SONS CO 19378 THE WINE COMPANY 19379 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 19380 DICK MACK° 19381 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 19382 AAA STRIPING SERVICE 19383 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS 19384 VOID OUT CHECK 19385 ARDEN AANESTAD 19386 DENICE ABELN 19387 ACT ELECTRONICS INC 19388 AIM ELECTRONICS INC 19389 AIRLIFT DOORS INC 19390 AIRSIGNAL INC 9391 ALASKAN AIR CONDITIONING INC i392 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH 19393 AMERICAN BANK & TRUST 19394 THE AMERICAN FORESTRY ASSN 19395 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO 19396 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC 19397 AMERICAN RED CROSS 19398 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 19399 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 19400 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC 19401 ANIMAL INN 19402 ANDERSONS GARDEN 19403 AQUA ENGINEERING INC 19404 ARCA INC 19405 ARTFORM COMMUNICATIONS INC 19406 ASHBACH CONSTRUCTION CO 19407 AUDIO VISUAL WHOLESALERS 19408 B & S TOOLS )409 BACONS ELECTRIC CO 250.00 75.00 2564.01 18635.99 2894.70 18964.50 14666.52 25679.78 , 145.00 150.50 262.00 175.00 164.78 1688.42 974.05 0.00 70.00 390.00 125.00 310.00 228.50 519.78 205.00 213.35 225.00 45.00 602.64 40.23 134.50 3284.32 454.23 1005.40 19.00 59.50 223.92 2932.50 13.62 2119.65 575.95 371.35 2362.85 10382154 25U9 -REPAIRED/INSTALLED OUTLETS/REPLACED MOTOR STARTER-WATER DEPT 19410 BARCO BEARING CO SILICONE-WATER DEPT 19411 PATRICIA BARKER HELIUM FILLED BALLOONS-HUMAN RESOURCES 19412 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -SIGNALS/HOSE CLAMPS/SPARK PLUGS/WIPER -BLADES/WINDSHIELD SOLVENT/BATTERIES - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19413 BELL ATLANTIC TRICON LEASING CORP OCTOBER 91 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE 19414 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-HWY 169 TRAFFIC STUDY 19415 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP RECOVERY BASIN REPAIRS-WATER DEPT 19416 BEST ELECTRIC -REPLACE FIXTURE CAPACITOR IN LIGHT POLE/ -LOCATED & MARKED DAMAGED UNDERGROUND WIRE- PARK MAINTENANCE 19417 BEST & FLANAGAN SERVICE-RILEY LAKE LAWCON PROJECT 240.40 19418 BEWIATIC WHOLESALE & VENDING COFFEE DECANTER-SENIOR PROGRAMS 11.96 19419 BLACK DIAMOND SANDBLASTING GRIT-STREET MAINTENANCE 88.50 19420 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT/FIRE 284.66 DEPT/PLANNING DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION 19421 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON -SEPTEMBER 91 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE- 886.00 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 19422 LOIS BOETTCHER MINUTES-PARK & REC COMMISSION 110.93 19423 LEE BRANDT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 192.00 19424 BRAUN INTERTEC -SERVICE-BITUMINOUS TESTING-STREET 11200.25 -MAINT/BLUFFS W 9TH ADDITION/STARING LN & -SUNRISE CIRCLE UTILITY & STREET CONST/ -CEDAR RIDGE & CORRAL LN UTILTIY & STREET CONST/BLUE STEM RIDGE 19425 BREDEMUS HARDWAR CO FLUSH BOLTS-FACILITIES DEPT 29.37 19426 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC -BAG NOZZLE/VACUUM CLEANER/BAGS/CADDY BAG- 229.90 -FACILITIES DEPT 19427 BRO-TRX INC TOWELS-FACILITIES DEFT r 75 19428 VOID OUT CHECK k 00 19429 THOMAS BUCHNER -SERVICE-QUALITY TEAM COACHING-CITY 6000.00 MANAGEMENT 19430 BROADWAY AWARDS PLAQUES/TROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 250.00 19431 BROWN & CRIS INC REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 574.73 19432 BRW INC -SERVICE-DELL ROAD DESIGN/VALLEY VIEW ROAD 24762.20 CONSTRUCTION 19433 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-PARK MAINTENANCE 446.64 19434 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC SEPTEMBER 91 WASTE DISPOSAL 1431.15 19435 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE BOOK-FACILITIES DEPT 55.26 19436 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 300.00 19437 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC SHELVING UNIT-FACILITIES DEFT 187.60 19438 JODY CARLIN RADIO-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50.00 19439 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SEPTEMBER 91 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 381.25 19440 VOID OUT CHECK 0100 19441 DAN CARLSON 19442 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO INC 19443 CENTEX HOMES 19444 CENTRAIRE INC 94.78 17.50 4f- 36 358.68 2770.87 495.37 451.00 -EXPENSES/COMPUTER SOFTWARE MANUAL- POLICE DEPT -REPLACED CONDENSER MOTOR BEARING & BLADE- LIQUOR STORE -REFUND-ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION APPLICATION FEE -AIR CONDITIONER REPAIR-POLICE BUILDING & CITY HALL 50.59 330.24 50.0C 168.4E 5304442 ;al) 19445 CHANNING L BETE CO INC 19446 CITY OF CHASKA 19447 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1 9448 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC r449 JAMES G CLARK 19450 CLEAR SWEEP INC 19451 CUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS 19452 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 19453 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT 19454 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC 19455 COPIES NOW 19456 COPY EQUIPMENT INC 19457 CORPORATE GRAPHICS INTL 19458 CORPORATE REPORT MN 19459 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS 19460 CROWN MARKING INC 19461 CULLIGAN - METRO 19462 CUMMINS DIESEL SALES INC 19463 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC 19464 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC 19465 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY 19466 DALCO 4 q467 DAN & DAMS MINUTEMAN PRESS ,468 DAY TIMERS 19469 DECORATIVE DESIGNS 19470 DEN CON LANDFILL INC 19471 JAMES DICKEY 19472 DIVERSIFIED CLEANING SERVICES 19473 DONALDSON COMPANY INC 19474 DORADUS CORP 19475 DORSEY & WHITNEY 19476 THE DROZDAL COMPANY 19477 DYNA SYSTEMS 19478 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 19479 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISION 19480 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 19481 EDEN PRAIRIE TIRE & AUTO SERVICE 19482 CITY OF EDINA 19483 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES 19484 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR INC 19485 ELSMORE AQUATIC 19486 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC -235583 PET PROTECTION LITERATURE-ANIMAL CONTROL 158.25 -GOLF COURSE RENTAL-SUMMER SKILL 704.00 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM/FEES PAID FCAMJET NOZZLE-FIRE DEPT 224.55 GEAR LUBRICANT/OIL-WATER DEFT 2158.00 OCTOBER 91 EXPENSES 224.32 STRIPING PARKING LOT-COMMUNITY CENTER 549.32 -SERVICE -WAL MART BUILDING & SITE DESIGN 4000.00 STUDY -CONCRETE PLANT INPSECTIONS -VALLEY VITA 1464.64 RD EXTENSION AIR COMPRESSOR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 825.00 -FACE PIECES/GOGGLES/HEADGEAR/WINDOWS- 155.09 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PRINTING FORMS-POLICE DEFT 150.00 NAILS-ENGINEERING DEFT & ASSESSING DEPT 94.28 TRAFFIC TICKET FORMS-POLICE DEPT 439.85 SUBSCRIPTION-ADMINISTRATION 24.00 OCTOBER 91 INSURANCE CONSULTANT SERVICE 610.00 -DESK SIGN/RUBBER STAMP-PARK & EEO DEPT/ 20.35 LIQUOR STORK -SERVICE-STARING LAKE PARK BLDG/OUTDouR 63.00 CENTER MANUAL/ENGINE BLOCK REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MNTC 428.45 LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 193.59 -CONDENSOR/POINT SET/BASE & POST/SCREWS- 39.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 16628.37 -CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT & 1542.40 COMMUNITY CENTER/WATER DEFT PRINTING-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 281.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES-RECREATION SUPERVISOR 21.93 OCTOBER 91 SERVICE-CITY HALL 79.10 -SEPTEMBER 91 WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET DEPT & 31.50 PARK MAINTENANCE REFUND-DOUBLE PAYMENT ON UTILITY BILL 8.26 CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORE 226.50 DUST BAGS-WATER DEPT 610.18 -4TH QTR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR WARNING 720.00 SIREN DECODERS-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT LEGAL SERVICE-BOND PAYMENTS 14750.00 SERVICE-STRATEGIC PLANNING-HUMAN RESOURCES 665.00 DRILL BITS/WASHERS-WATER DEFT 363.02 -SEPTEMBER 91 COPIER MAINTENANCE 840.94 AGREEMENT/TONER-CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SERVICE-FIRE STATIONS 283.85 LABELS-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION 39.80 -TIRES/WHEEL ALIGNMENT/TIE RODS/SLEEVES- 1803.24 EQUIPMENT MAINT/SEWER DEPT SEPTEMBER 91 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 205.00 REPAIR GREASE LEAK-WATER DEPT 99.00 MOTOR REPAIR-FACILITIES DEPT 38.87 SWIM SUITS-POOL OPERATIONS 170.10 -GLOVES/PVC BOOTS/OVERALLS/JACKET/PAINT 421.86 SPRAY-FACILITIES DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION )sa 19487 ENVIRO-TECH SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE 18.00 ' 19488 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-PLANNING DEPT 22.92 ' 19489 FEED RITZ CONTROLS INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 6486.26 19490 FIDELTY PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING 48.84 ' 19491 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES GOALS-PARK MAINTENANCE if-^,00 19492 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 13 !61 19493 LYNDELL FREY VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 210.00 19494 G & K SERVICES -COVERALLS/TOWELSANOP HEADS-PARK DEPT/ 828.42 LIQUOR STORE/WATER DEPT 19495 G-F ELECTRIC INC TRANSFORMER REPAIRS-FIRE STATION 200.00 19496 CT LAWN SERVICE -SEPTEMBER 91 MOWING SERVICE-PLEASANT 265.00 HILLS CEMETERY 19497 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC LIABILITY INSURANCE 45176.53 19498 JOHN GABOS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 25.00 19499 GENERAL BINDING CORP SPIRAL BINDER REPAIR-CITY HALL 506.35 19500 GENERAL MACHINING INC COUPLINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 102.00 19501 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD -SPRING WATER/PAPER CUPS/COOLER RENTAL- 117.60 , COMMUNITY CENTER 19502 CHARLES A GOBLE EVIDENCE BAGS-POLICE DEFT 90.00 19503 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SERVICE 102.50 19504 W W GRAINGER INC -RIVETER/SCREWDRIVER SET/SPOUT/OIL CAN/ 243.65 -VENT FAN MOTOR/BINS/GAUGE/LIGHT-EQUIPMENT MAINT/FACILITIES DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION 19505 PETER GRAVES VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 90.00 , 19506 ALAN GRAY JULY/AUGUST & SUMMER 91 EXPENSES 610.85 19507 GRAYBOW DANIELS CO THERMOSTAT-COMMUNITY CENTER 26.28 19508 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC -UNDERGROUND WIRE REPAIR/STREET LIGHTING 664.20 -REPAIR/FLUORESCENT BALLAST-STREET DEPT/ PARK MAINTENANCE 19509 HACH CO LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 267.66 19510 MICHAEL HAMILTON FOOTBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 7• 00 19511 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-CREEK MOLLS/HAWK HIGH RIDGE/ 151 ,.35 BLUFFS E 8TH ADDITION 19512 HARMON GLASS COMPANY -TEMPERED GLASS/WINDSHIELD-DRAINAGE 174.75 CONTROL DEPT/SEWER DEPT 19513 HEAVENLY HAM EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES 100.00 19514 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATOR 54.25 19515 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS 330.00 19516 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 94.00 19517 HEWN GTY DEPT OF PROPERTY TAX POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATION 250.25 19518 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SEPTEMBER 91 TREE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 316.80 19519 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 163.35 19520 D C HEY COMPANY INC COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT 52.02 19521 HIULEEST CAFE & CATERING EXPENSES-EMPLOYEE PICNIC 904.00 19522 HONEYWELL IN SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIR-WATER PLANT 115.11 19523 HONEYWELL INC CHARTS-WATER DEPT 215.72 19524 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC -STRAINER GASKET/COMPRESSOR OIL/FREON/ 1643.12 -DRIER CORE/ICE PLANT PUMP SYSTEM REPAIR/ PIPE UNPLUGGED-ICE ARENA -COMMUNITY CENTER 19525 HUDSON MAP COMPANY WALL MAP WITH ROLLERS-UTILITIES DEPT 199.9f 19526 ISFI DUES-FIRE DEPT 120.0C 19527 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 -CONFERENCE FEE/39D QTR 91 HUMAN RIGHTS & 4652.7", -SERVICES COMM GRANT FOR FAMILY CENTER PLUS -PROGRAM-$2500/ROOM RENTAL-SPECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM/DAY CAMP/SPORTS & SPECIAL CAMPS 8307691 5 69 19528 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES INC 19529 INSTY-PRINTS 19530 INTOXIMETERS INC 1 9531 GARY ISAACS 19632 JERRYS NEWMARKET 19533 E F JOHNSON CO 19534 JUSTUS LUMBER CO 19535 DAN N KANTAR 19536 ELYCE KASTIGAR 19537 KENDALL/HUNT PUBLISHING CO 19538 KAREN KNUTSON 19539 KNOX 19540 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC 19541 KOKESH LANDSCAPING 19542 KOSS PAINT & WALLPAPER 19543 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER 19544 JERRY KREBSBACH 9545 LA FILE 3546 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 19547 LABEL PRODUCTS INC 19548 ROBERT LAMBERT 19549 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES 19550 LANDSHAPES INC 19551 LANG PAULY & G'REGERSON LTD 19552 LANGFORD TOOL & DRILL 19553 BOB LANZI 19554 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS 19555 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 19556 LIL RED E P GROCERY 19557 LIONS TAP 19558 THE LOFT 19559 LOG IS 19560 LUNDS 19561 JOHN LUTTER 19662 M-V GAS CO 19563 GEORGE MARSHALL 19564 MARSHALL & SWIFT 19565 MASTER CRAFT LABELS INC RADAR TUNING FORK-POLICE DEFT BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT -LIGHT DISPLAY REPAIRED/REPLACED FUEL CELL/CALIBRATED UNIT-POLICE DEPT -VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS COORDINATOR/FEES PAID -EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT & HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM -BATTERY PARTS/ANTENNA PARTS/CHARGER -PARTS/BELT LOOP PARTS/SWIVEL PARTS/RADIO PARTS-POLICE DEPT TIMBERS/SPIKES-PARK MAINTENANCE PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION VOLLEYBALL GUIDE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS -OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES-PLATES/NAPKINS/NAME TAGS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION PLYWOOD/STUDS/SCREWS/WASHERS-FIRE DEPT -EYE GUARD/SQUASH RACQUET-VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM REFUND-HYDRANT DEPOSIT PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE -BOLTS/PLUGS/SUMP PUMPS/HEATERS/BUNGEE -CORDS/PLIERS/BULBS/MALLOT/CHISEL/BLADES/ -BUCKETS/WASHERS/FUSES/ROLLERS/CONNECTORS/ -TAPE/TRAP/LIGHTS/CABLE/CABLE TIES/ROPE/ -SCREWS/BROOMS/BRUSHES/BOLTS/BATTERIES/ -GLUE-FIRE DEPT/STREET DEPT/PARK DEPT/ COMMUNITY CENTER/UTILITIES DIVISION BUILDING MATERIALS-HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM SUBSCRIPTION-PARK PLANNING EYEWEAR STORAGE CABINET-UTILITIES DIVISION 9-1-1 STICKERS-POLICE DEPT OCTOBER 91 EXPENSES -BLOCK ASSEMBLY/MASTER ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TREES-WYNDHAM KNOLL PARK SEPTEMBER 91 LEGAL SERVICE -POWER FASTENER $365.00/PINS/STUDS/STRAP LOAD-WATER DEFT MILEAGE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS MANUAL-COMMUNITY SERVICES SEPTEMBER 91 SERVICE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT & FIRE DEPT -EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT/GIFT CERTIFICATE- VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM VOLLEYBALL T-SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS SEPTEMBER 91 SERVICE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT BROCHURE-FIRE DEPT GAS-OUTDOOR CENTER SERVICE-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY COMPUTER SOFTWARE-ASSESSING DEFT LABELS-POLICE DEPT 90.00 30.00 177.50 291.00 146.72 5197.20 104.84 6.42 93.00 7.96 23.80 136.44 75.87 237.58 53.97 1696.81 145.82 66.90 2642.91 715.78 205.00 71.58 3015.00 : 9045.93 537.10 94.50 35.00 8714.14 170.17 198.50 151.50 7985.75 43.11 95.0C 139.5C 350.0C 489.0( 450.0( 4373130 t,b'r)0 NOVEMBER 5.1991 19566 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 75.00 19567 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING -TYPESETTING-HALLOWEEN FLYERS-SOCIAL 35.00 PROGRAMS 19568 MCFARIANES INC CEMENT/TRAP ROCK-STREET MAINTENANCE 3; 19569 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT b.50 19570 METRO PRINTING INC PRINTING FORMS-POLICE DEPT & FIRE DEPT 1219.00 19571 METRO SALES INC -COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-RECREATION 2351.30 ADMINISTRATION 19572 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM NOVEMBER 91 SEWER SERVICE 156146.00 19573 KAREN MICHAEL MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES 52.50 19574 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO -REPAIR DUMP TRUCK BOX/AIR CONTROL VALVE- 414.50 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19575 MIDWEST AQUA CARE -SERVICE -EURASION WATER MILFOIL 1350.00 INSPECTIONS-PARK MAINTENANCE 19576 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP -BLACKTOP/SEAL COATING-PARK MAINTENANCE & 2162.20 STREET MAINTENANCE 19577 MINNCOMM PAGING OCDOBER 91 PAGER SERVICE-UTILITIES DEFT 58.48 19578 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 410.52 19579 MN BLUEPRINT PLAN HOLDER-ENGINEERING DEPT 1283.05 19580 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING/O-RINGS/PULL 409.00 PINS/AIR MASK BAGS-FIRE DEPT 19581 MRPA -SOFTBALL STATE ENTRY FEES-ORGANIZED 425.00 -ORGANIZED ATHLETICS/OFFICIALS CLINIC FOR VOLLEYBALL REFEREES 19582 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE INC WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEFT 127.50 19583 MN VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC LAB TEST-ANIMAL CONTROL 15.00 19584 CAROLYN MONSRUD SCHOOL-HUMAN RESOURCES 56.00 19585 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEFT 1007.46 19586 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO -ROLLER/SEAL-PARK MAINTENANCE & EQUIPMENT r 11 MAINTENANCE 19587 MUNICILITE CO DECK LIGHT WITH ANGLE BRACKET-WATER DEFT 59.40 19588 NATIONAL CHEMSEARCH CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 209.87 19589 NATL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN HANDBOOK-FIRE DEPT 93.20 19590 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT AEG-HUMAN RESOURCES 459.90 19591 NCR CORPORATION -CASH REGISTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 388.00 COMMUNITY CENTER 19592 NCR CORPORATION CASH REGISTER TAPE-COMMUNITY CENTER 63.92 19593 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS FAX PAPER & INK FIIM-CITY HALL 163.98 19594 JP NOREX INC -SERVICE-WATERMAIN BREAK-ANDERSON LAKES 5425.96 PKWY/NORTHWEST RACQUET & SWIM CLUB 19595 MICHAEL D NORMAN & ASSOCIATES CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 150.00 19596 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY -3RD QTR 91 COMPUTER RESIDENTIAL LIST- 68.99 WATER DEPT 19597 NORTHWEST ASPAHLT INC ROLLER RENTAL-STREET DEPT 930.00 19598 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT-DRAINAGE CONTROL 85.80 19599 KATHLEEN O'CONNOR EXPENSES-FIRE DEFT 229.74 19600 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC TYPEWRITER REPAIR-CITY HALL 215.00 19601 PACE LABORATORIES INC -WATER TESTS FOR FREON IN WATER SYSTEM- 1294.00 COMMUNITY CENTER 19602 PAPER WAREHOUSE -NAPKINS/PAPER CUPS/TRAYS FOR CITY PICNIC- 29.0C HUMAN RESOURCES DEFT 19603 PARAGON CABLE SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 19604 PEPSI COLA COMPANY CARBON DIOXIDE TANKS-COMMUNITY CENTER 105.0C 19605 PERSONNEL POOL -SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCEMATER DEPT & 157 ' 4( DRAINAGE CONTROL 17966423 NOVEMBER 5.1991 19606 CONNIE L PETERS 19607 PET FOOD OUTLET 1 9608 PITNEY BOWES INC ,d609 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC 19610 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT 19611 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 19612 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 19613 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING 19614 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 19615 PRENTICE HALL INC 19616 PRENTICE HALL 19617 PRIDE & PERFORMANCE INC 19618 PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT 19619 JOHN PRZYMUS 19620 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC 19621 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 19622 RADIO SHACK 19623 AAGE REFFSGAARD 19624 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN 9625 REUTER RECYCLING INC 626 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC 19627 ROAD RESCUE INC 19628 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 19629 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 19630 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 19631 SANCO INC 19632 THE SANDWICH FACTORY INC 19633 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC 19634 KURT SCHENDEL 19635 SANDRA K SCHIPPER 19636 WILBUR W SCHULTZ 19637 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION 19638 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 19039 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY 19640 SHERER BROS LUMBER 19641 J L SHIELY COMPANY 19642 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC 19643 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC 19644 SIGNS R US INC 19645 VOID our CHECK ,646 CECELIA M SMITH MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEFT -COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CENTER BLACKTOP-WATER DEPT PACKING-WATER DEPT -FURNISH & INSTALL DOORBELL SYSTEM/ -KEYLESS FIXTURE-FIRE STATION/DISCONNECT -REPAIRED-PARK MAINT/HAND DRYER REPAIRED- COMMUNITY CENTER -CHAIN/BLADE SHARPENED/WEED TRIMMER -STRING/SPRINGS/PLATE/RECOIL ASSEMBLY-FIRE -DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER/ WATER DEPT EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER-HUMAN RESOURCES CASSETTE TAPES-PLANNING DEPT BOOK-PARK PLANNING MANUAL-HUMAN RESOURCES PRESENTATION AWARDS-HUMAN RESOURCES LIGHT METER-SAFETY DEFT -SERVICE-DRIVING RANGE GOLF BALLS-SUMMER SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM HOIST MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/BLADE BOLT SET- COMMUNITY CENTER ANTENNA REPAIR-POLICE DEFT EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT PAPER ROLL-LIQUOR STORE WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE -SERVICE-ROWLAND RD/MITCHELL RD CONST/ -STARING LW & SUNRISE CIRCLE STREET & UTILITY DESIGN SOLENOID VALVE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MLC FUNDS TRANSFERRED TO CITY OF ROSEVILLE SPRAYBAR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -CLEANING SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE/ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/ COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT ART SUPPLIES-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM SOFTBALL & VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 3RD QUARTER 91 SENIOR OUTREACH SERVICES PLASTIC TAGS-WATER DEPT -BUILDING MATERIALS-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM GRAVEL-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/WATER DEPT SERVICE-R BASE DATABASES-STREET DEFT T-SHIRTS-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT SIGN-POLICE DEPT ART SUPPLIES-KIDS KORNER PROGRAM 11.00 29.00 141.00 400.00 140.79 533.15 181.28 167.10 61.38 55.95 85.47 759.60 114.95 444.00 196.00 71.90 19.95 15.00 6.88 182.60 80233.22 10.57 5669.32 350.00 211.00 822.63 51.12 202.55 44.79 31.06 568.00 159.74 1107.25 24.57 751.90 506.68 1139.50 326.00 130.00 0.00 63.24 9602014 NOVEMBER 5.1991 19647 W GORDON SMITH CO PROPANE/PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19648 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC FILM-POLICE DEFT 19649 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC -BALLOONS/CASSETTE TAPES/DYE/FILM-ACTIVITY PROGRAM/TEEN WORK PROGRAM 19650 SOUTHDALE YMCA 3RD QUARTER 91 COMMUNITY SERVICES 19651 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -EMPLOYMENT ADS-CITY HALL/FACILITIES DEFT/ LIQUOR STORE 19652 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -LEGAL ADS-CITY HALL/OKTOBERFEST DISPLAY AD-SPECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM 19653 SPORTS WORLD USA SOFTBALLS/VOLLEYBALLS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 19654 SPS JM OFFICE PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/UTILITIES DIVSION 19655 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC PIPE END CAPS-PARK MAINTENANCE 19656 THE STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 19657 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS 19658 STRAND MFG CO INC RINGS & SQUARE TUBS-WATER DEFT 19659 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ AMMUNITION-POLICE DEFT 19660 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC -SERVICE-DELL RD/HWY 5 SO FRONTAGE RD/ DELEGARD PROPERTY 19661 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -CABLE ASSEMBLY/EMBLEM/THROTTLE/INDICATOR/ -AXLE SEAL REPAIR/TRANSMISSION REPAIR/ -BUSHINGS/GASKETS/RINGS/VALVE-WATER DEPT/ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19662 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE SEPTIC TANK SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 19663 SYSTEM CONTROL SERVICES SERVICE-WATER DEPT 19664 TANK RE-NU OF MINNESOTA GAS TANK REPAIR/GAS TANKS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 19665 KATHY TEKIELA -ART SUPPLIES-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 19666 TESSMAN SEED INC GRASS SEED-PARK MAINTENANCE 19667 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC 200 TIMBERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 19668 TOTAL POINT COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 19669 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO CONCRETE MIX-STREET DEFT 19670 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO REPAIR ROLLING STEEL DOOR-WATER DEFT 19671 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO HELIUM-FIRE DEPT/OXYGEN-EQUIPMENT MAINT 19672 PAIN CITY PAPER SUPPLY CO INC 3 HOLE PUNCHED COLORED PAPER-POLICE DEPT 19673 TWIN CITIES RHINO LININGS -RUBBERIZED SPRAY FOR LINING VAN-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 19674 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BADGES/IIMIEMS-POLICE DEPT 19675 UNITED STORES BATTERY PACK-ENGINEERING DEFT 19676 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -RING SEAL/LOCK WASHERS/GLOVES/HEX NUTS/ ELBOW-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19677 VESSCO INC -ELECTROLYTE/LINKS/SWITCH & MAGNET/SEAL SPOUT/KNOB-WATER DEFT 19678 VICOM INC WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CTR 19679 VIKING LABORATORIES INC -OXYGEN/CHLORINE/SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE - COMMUNITY CENTER 19680 VIKING STEEL PRODUCTS INC EXTENSION ROD GATE/BAND-WATER DEPT 19681 VISION ENERGY PROPANE-COMMUNITY CENTER 19682 VOSS LIGHTING MINI LAMPS/LIGHT REPAIRS-FACILITIES DEPT 19683 VAR SCIENTIFIC INC -BEAKERS/CYLINDERS/GEL/CHEESECLOTH/WIPES/ WIPER-WATER DEPT 19684 REESE WAGNER INC SERVICE-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATRE 19685 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY -RUBBER GASKET/CEMENT/COUPLING ADAPTER,' -COUPLING REPAIR/VALVE EXTENSION/VALVE BOX/HYDRANT GREASE/5/8 IN METER-WATER DEPT 148.43 36.37 60 36 27iG.00 205.92 372.54 304.00 415.52 24.76 311.48 165.00 28.00 59.00 6583.19 1140.30 80.00 98.40 335.00 255.92 59 - 10 rh 25.00 144.40 132.00 138.91 1670.40 325.00 131.50 63.00 975.07 318.08 1.75 416.80 56.92. 94.60 321.37 382.40 1400.00 825.49 2316073 NOVEMBER 5.1991 19686 WBCS 19687 SANDRA F WERTS 9688 NEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 19689 VOID OUT CHECK 19690 STEVEN J WHITE 19691 ROBERTA WICK 19692 DONNA YOUNG 19693 BARBARA ZAIC 19694 JIM ZAIC 19695 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 19696 CRAIG ZEMKE 19697 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 19698 ZIEGLER INC 19699 PAUL & NICOLE ZIVALICH 19700 BRUCE ISAACS 11000 FIRST TRUST BANK 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 11000 NORWEST BANK MN N A 18565 VOID OUT CHECK 19109 VOID OUT CHECK 19117 VOID OUT CHECK 19120 VOID OUT CHECK 19213 VOID OUT CHECK 19224 VOID OUT CHECK 19235 VOID OUT CHECK 19240 VOID OUT CHECK 354517624 -CUMMINS GRILL HALLOWEEN FLYER-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM EXPENSES/MILEAGE-SENIOR CENTER 3RD QUARTER 91 SERVICE SAFETY HABITS MANUAL-POLICE DEPT MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL INSTRUCTOR -OUTDOCR CENTER PROGRAM MILEAGE-SENIOR CENTER MEETING EXPENSE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 1ST AID SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/PARK MAINT/ EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER REFUND-SOFTBALL PLAY-OFF FEES CHOKE & CARBURETOR CLEANER-EQUIPMENT MAINT GASKETS/SEAL 0 RINGS/GEAR-EQUIPMENT MAINT -BUILDING MATERIALS-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS 22.00 50.10 375.00 0.00 14.00 350.00 35.00 5.23 15.00 472.25 50.00 79.50 95.99 854.45 168.00 24399.38 93222.42 3432143.50 21.00 , 5592.50 37.42 208.00 146.20 472.30 134.95 663.21 $4461738.60 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 398564.28 8.26 2250.00 66928.84 40791.56 665.00 25.00 240.40 238.16 225.00 3214352.02 92582.50 201.74 33580.60 59175.00 190715.88 95208.58 5000.00 11089.67 75101.92 159955.81 495.00 4153.02 1752.17 5669.32 2770.87 10 GENERAL 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDENT 12 CERTIFICATE DEBT FD 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 20 CEMETERY OPERATIONS 21 POLICE DRUG FORFEITURE 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 40 86 FIRE STATION DEBT 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 47 89 RECREATION REFUNDING 48 89 BLDG REFUNDING 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 55 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND ARB 56 ROAD IMPROVEMENT DEBT FD 60 IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 61 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND 62 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 73 WATER FUND 77 SEWER FUND 80 POLICE CONFISCATED FDS 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 87 CDBG FUND 88 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 90 TAX INCREMENT FUND $4481738.80 T1S MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning THROUGH: Carl Julie, City Manager DATE: October 31, 1991 SUBJECT: Consideration of City Purchase of Five P a r c e l s L y i n g W e s t o f E d e n R o a d , N o r t h and South of Singletree Lane In a letter dated September 25, 1991, Kelly J. Doran and Donald G. Brauer have made an offer to sell five properties located west of Eden Road t o t h e C i t y o f E d e n P r a i r i e . A n u m b e r o f questions arise when considering this. I. Why should the City of Eden Prairie acquire these p a r c e l s ? 2. How should the City acquire these parcels if it is to a c q u i r e t h e m ? 3. Are there other alternatives which allow adequate c o n t r o l o v e r t h e s e p a r c e l s w i t h o u t buying them? 4. What would the City of Eden Prairie do with these pa r c e l s i f a c q u i r e d ? 5. What are the risks involved in the acquisition of the s e p r o p e r t i e s ? 6. What are the risks involved in not acquiring these pr o p e r t i e s ? PURCHASE OR REGULATE It has been suggested that in order for the City of Ede n P r a i r i e t o b e p r o a c t i v e i n t h e d o w n t o w n area and to be effective in proscribing the highest a n d b e s t l a n d u s e , i t m a y b e n e c e s s a r y t o actually own the properties. This is not a new concep t t o c i t i e s b u t h a s n o t b e e n u t i l i z e d a s t h e main tool in the City's development toolbox over the l a s t t w e n t y y e a r s . The City, through judicious application of ordina n c e s , p o l i c i e s a n d d e v e l o p m e n t r e v i e w standards, has been able to positively effect both place m e n t o f l a n d u s e s , a n d t h e u l t i m a t e f o r m of those uses. Control of land use and form of develo p m e n t i s t h e r e a s o n f o r a C o m p r e h e n s i v e Guide Plan and the reason for City codes and standar d s . H o w e v e r , a s t h e C i t y h a s g r o w n , s o have the expectations as to the final result. The City Council has a vision of the Major Center A r e a d e v e l o p e d i n t o a s p e c i a l d o w n t o w n center, which will: "provide an active, bustling, c e n t r a l g a t h e r i n g p o i n t , t h a t i s p e d e s t r i a n '2 31 to Memorandum October 31, 1991 Page 2 friendly, accessible to the entire community, and which lends a small town feeling and opportunity for tradition." This 1987 Strategic Plan goal statement is more specific in its prescription of the form of the special downtown area than any of the plans that have been implemented to date for the area. The Major Center Area PUD and the Comprehensive Guide Plan are quite broad; the vision is more specific. Hence, the recent clashing of values between the market and the City Council's desires in the area. The idea of regulatory control must be accepted in a broad sense, or the Council would not be comfortable in the role of Comprehensive Planning the entire community. If the issue in a specific area, such as "downtown" is, that the "vision" is not clear enough to develop regulatory standard (but rather "I'll know what I want when I see it"), then perhaps the ownership idea is valid on a small scale. AREAS OF POSSIBLE PURCHASE The three parcels being offered for sale by Don Brauer north of Singletree Lane and west of Eden Road may not offer adequate control by themselves without aggregating them together with a portion of the Teman property. Consideration should be given to negotiate some type of land or development right for a portion of the Teman property as well. This will make acquisition of the Brauer parcel most effective. The Teman homestead lying north of these three parcels is not being offered at this time, but, may be under the same pressures as the parcels being offered. This must also be taken into consideration. The two lots lying south of Singletree Lane and west of Eden Road being offered by The Robert Larsen Partners, Inc. and Tess Burnam could be combined to provide a reasonably sized restaurant site or held as a part of further acquisitions in the area as properties become available. This would allow potential for the City to eventually aggregate all 61/2 acres of property lying south of Singletree Lane and west of 169 for a future use. The City must weigh whether it is more likely that the properties will be bought one or two at a time for smaller uses or whether a private aggregation or larger uses would occur. Obviously, there is a balancing act here, because the goal is not to end up with large land uses that have no pedestrian scale to them, and not end up with uses so small that there is no continuity. If the City is to acquire properties in the Eden Road area, it should be at fair market value. The properties north of Singletree Lane should be considered only if some control of the Teman property is also a quantifiable given. It is likely that there will be immediate further Memo October 31, 1991 Page 3 development pressure on the Teman property, and any City involvement could be relatively short term. MECHANICS OF PURCHASE The City could use its Housing and Redevelopment Authority as a vehicle to purchase, hold, and manage the property and use tax increment financing in order to fund the acquisitions. The City should explore the ability to gain financial control of the properties with as little money as possible, utilizing the tools of contract for deed, option, and/or a balloon payment to reduce upfront costs. There has not been adequate opportunity to analyze each individual property as to its rental income stream or rental possibility for offsetting holding costs. This would need to be done with an in depth study. RISKS The City risks paying too much for the properties and losing money if an inflated price were paid and a market was not readily available for the property. The City may be tempted to divest itself of the properties at less than cost, to land uses not totally to the City's liking. This would be a "lose/lose" situation. A risk of not purchasing the properties would be poor land uses and implementation if the City's regulatory controls were not used effectively. Poor compatibility of uses and hodgepodge development is also a risk. RECOMMENDATION If the City Council feels that ownership of the properties in the Eden Road area is necessary in order to control development and aggregate property to help realize the broad vision of the downtown area, then: I. Purchase of the properties should be the least up front cost. 2. The City should hire an independent appraiser to appraise the properties for market value and should use these appraisals to assist them in their negotiations. The appraisals should set the upper limit of value for purchase offers by the City. These appraisals do not have to be made public unless the negotiating parties exchange appraisals or a purchase agreement is entered into. (Roger Pauly memo of October 22, 1987 regarding data practices). tgp.,0 Memo October 31, 1991 Page 4 3. Control of additional land from the Teman parcel north of Singletree Lane is necessary in order to gain any advantage in purchasing the three properties from Eden Prairie Associates. September 25, 1991 Kelly J. Doran 5905 Ewing Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55410 Donald G. Brauer Managing Partner Eden Prairie Assoc. 6116 Parnell Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 Eden Prairie City Council 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Major Center Area Land Acquisition Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of the property owners that currently own the five residential homes along Eden Road adjacent to Singletree Lane, we are writing to request that the City Council formally consider the acquisition of these properties. Three of these properties, those north of Singletree, are owned by Eden Prairie Associates of which Don Brauer is a Partner, the two properties south of Singletree are owned by Ms. Tess Burnham and The Robert Larsen Partners, Inc.. It became very apparent during the lengthy discussions about the approval of the Wal-Mart plan that there was general agreement on the Council that this area was to be developed under a comprehensive or master plan approach. Although, there may be some difference of opinion as to the final result of Wal-Mart, and how that fits into the overall plan, there should be no disagreement about the distinct advantages to seeing smaller parcels combined with the larger pieces to create an opportunity for a master plan to be taken to completion. The alternative independent development of each parcel will create a hodge-podge of development that will most likely be contrary to the overall vision of the Council. Because of the development of the Wal-Mart, a growing list of parties will be Interested in developing these parcels. The negative side of that is that, because must of these parcels are small, the type of development that can functionally work on these sites is limited to small site users such as fast food restaurants, quick oil change, muffler shops, tire stores, drive-thru banks, etc. Although there may be differences of opinion as to the appropriateness of these users, the economic situation of the property owners will force them to sell to the first qualified buyer that makes an offer. gg,0 Donald G. Brauer Phone It 944-7533 cc: Carl Julle Chris Enger Tess Burnham Robert Larsen Sincerely Yours, Kelly -1--Doran Enclosure: Phone IS 927-6594 Page Two: The purchase of these properties, from three willing owners, would put the City in an excellent position to have a major role in the development of the remaining portion of the City Center. These properties are of significant Importance in the development of the Teman parcel and in the future redevelopment of the area along Highway 169. As conditions warrant, and when or if Columbine Road is extended south of Prairie Center Drive, the ownership of all of these properties will allow the City to have an active part in future developments in this area at a land cost that is today very reasonable. Since the City is about to embark on a major project to incorporate the urban design ideas that came about during the Wal-Mart process, it will be important to eliminate these non-conforming and deteriorating properties prior to investing public money for improvements. It could be argued that the City should wait to acquire these properties when a specific development proposal comes along. However, we all spent alot of time talking about planning for development of this area, versus reacting to development proposals as they come about. In addition, taking the above position only enhances the potential of the piece-meal development of this important area. Based on the above, we are asking that the City acquire these properties prior to seeing them on the agenda for approval of projects that may not meet your expectations. We have included an Exhibit that outlines each property address, asking price, amount of assessments to be assumed, lot area and other information for your review and consideration. We appreciate your thoughtful consideration of this matter and look forward to having discussions with each of you about this idea. If in the meantime, you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give Don Brauer or me a call. AVE • EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD AND SINGLETREE LANE PROPERTIES STATISTICAL SUMMARY AS OF 9/25/91 EPASSOCO/COSTSUM3 a C D ITEM NO DESCRIPTION PARCEL/ADDRESS PETERSON .(C8034) MENKE (A-8018) MARTIN (B8042) TOTALS (EP ASSOC) LARSEN (LtC-8110) SURNHAM (LtB-8100) TOTALS (ALL) 1 PID NO. (14-116-22) 24-0001 24-0002 24-0004 * 24-0006 24-0005 * FRONT. .EDEN ROAD 200 150 116 466 140 140 746 [ FRONT. SINGLETREE 0 0 167 167 0 167 334 4 LOT AREA (SF) 33,400 25,050 19,414 77,864 23,000 23,000 123,864 TAXES/SPECIALS 10/15/91 24,884 22,187 19,092 66,163 CURRENT 11,000 77,163 [ ASSESS. BALANCE (EST) 12,000 9,000 7,000 28,000 9,000 9,600 46,600 ASKING PRICE INCLUDING SPECIALS 218,000 164,000 147,000 529,000 152,000 174,600 855,600 ASKING PRICE/SF 6.53 6.55 7.57 6.79 6.61 7.59 6.91 II --44# — ,wob -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl lullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, P.E., Director of Public Works DATE: October 31, 1991 SUBJECT: Petition to Close Heritage Road at TH 5 Attached is the pertinent correspondence regarding the issue of closure of Heritage Road at TH 5. Although it is apparent that the issue began to surface early this spring; however, the nature and extent of this request has only been brought to staff attention last week. Therefore, the facts surrounding the request and the implications of implementing such a request are not available to be included in the council packet. City staff has begun the following to develop a position on the request: A. Benshoof & Associates has been retained on an hourly basis to advise us regarding the implication of this closure to traffic patterns in the neighborhood. B. City staff is providing some spot elevations to MnDOT, who will in turn rerun the noise model for the neighborhood in an attempt to determine noise levels with and without the closure and associated berm installation. This information may not be ready by Tuesday night. C. We have contacted the project engineer for TH 5 and are advised that their goal is to switch traffic onto the new pavement (westbound or northerly lanes) prior to winter. However, some of their operations are weather dependent and they may not be able to do so. If the lane switch is made, they would be providing temporary connections at Carnelian and Heritage Roads either late next week or early the following week. It would appear there will be fairly strong support from residents to make the closure. However, we would recommend that some sort of public meeting process be established prior to making a decision for closure. Based on recent past discussions with residents along Evener Way and previous concerns expressed by residents along Luther Way regarding traffic patterns, it would be advisable to make certain that all of the residents in the neighborhood bounded by TH 5, Eden Prairie Road, Valley View Road, railroad tracks, and Dell Road have an opportunity to voice an opinion if Council is inclined toward considering the request. Staff will be prepared to address the issue in more detail at the council meeting. EAD:ssa ev7 I RHOIJSE Sidney Pauly Veto Repr•sentaffy* District 42A Hennepin County F{:4;n PkiE Minnesota House of Representatives Robert Vsnasak, Speaker COMMITTEES :TAXES, STATE TAXES & TAX LAWS SUBCOMMITTEE ENVIRONMENT 6 NATURAL REscatmeas, GAME & FISH SUBCOMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INTERNATIONAL TRADE TECHNOLOGY DIVISION. SMALL BUSINESS SUBCOMMITTEE: ETHICS October 29, 1991 Carl Julie City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: Here is the correspondence you asked for; neighborhood - Pauly; Pauly - Riley; Riley - Pauly; Pauly - neighborhood. Also, the full acoustical report from Sabinski's test. The test monitored noise in their back yard - several homes removed from the source. Sincerely, Sidney Pauly State Representatives District 42A SP/sb Attachments 17450 West 78th Street, Edell Prairie, MillfuldOta 55345 18121937-2584 Stem Me* Building. St Paw, Minnesota 66155 (612)296440 E • .40Sla Minnesota House of Representatives mom veramm. &Now Sldney Pauly .State Representative District 42A Hennepin County I RHOUSE FR.^: 612-296 -7;549 eotasurrsas: TAXES. STATE TAXES & TAX LAWS SUBCOMMITTEE: ENVIRONMENT a NATU R A L R E S O U R C E S . GAME & FISH SUBCOMMITTEE: TRANSPORTATION. ECONOMIC DEVELOPME N T : I N T E R N A T I O N A L T R A D E & TECHNOLOGY DIVISION. SMALL BUSINESS SUBCOMMITTEE, ETHICS October 15, 1991 Donald & Beverly Sabinske 7740 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dear Don and Beverly: This is a follow up on my recent letter concerning Highway 5 construction. MN DOT is still willing to close off the Heritage/Hwy 5 intersection and fill in the noise berm. This would undoubtably make the neighborhood more quiet and more private. There is no question that a tremendous amount of noise pours through the Heritage opening and it will only get worse. We have used the no access traffic pattern all summer. We know the flow of traffic and inconveniences that no access at Heritage brings. I am somewhat neutral and would be willing to abide by the sense of the neighborhood. If we decide we want to close the access and live behind the berra, we will have to convince the City of Eden Prairie as MN DOT needs City approval. I woul d personally encourage the Mayor and council members to direct the staff to agree with th e neighborhood's v.ishcs. Please !et my office know how you feel (open and no berm or closed with berm) by calling my office, 296-7449 between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. M-F - they will keep track. I need to have some sort of a consensus by Wednesday. October 23rd. Thanks for the help - it's been a bang summer! ,cerely, State Representative District 42A SP/Sb 74S0 Wow 78th Street Eden PralrIe, MInnesoli 55348 State Office R00% St. Patti. minamom 5515$ a1;1'16 1512)931.2554 tela) 296-744e • FR; bl.:-.ZE46-j949 PAIlE 02 10419% SI Patricia Ortloif 7610 Atherton Way Edon Prairie, MN 55346 J. R. & Diane Brassel 7640 Atherton Way (0Cri ., Eden Prairie, MN 55346 J. W. & Judith Carlson 7661 Atherton Way Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Btuce & Debra Larsen 7620 Atherton Way Eden Prairie, MN 553 ,16 David & Mary Johnson 7641 Atherton Way (4'4" Eden Prairie, MN 55346 ixwatiev4=1,04 7680 Atherton Way Cclo92-) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Kenneth & Marion Gensen 7621 Atherton Way (r.ti: 4 13 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 ' Donald & Barb Johnsop...;* 7660 Atherton Way * Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Mike & Sue Kortum 7730 Atherton Way Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Doug & Lottie Bischoff , 7740 Atherton Way (:,?en) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Eric & Rosanne Sit 7536 Carnelian Lane &JedPaac, MN 55346 Steven Wentzel 7556 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Brad & Pam Dodds , 7595 Carnelian Lane koPen) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Robert & Bonnie Johnson 7626 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Mark & Sharon Snetting 7656 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 David & Sue Stevens 7760 Atherton Way (c Ic5e) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Frank & Candy Rcker 7546 Carnelian lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jody Dulebohn 7566 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bob & Melody Villars 7616 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bob & JoAnn Sieger! 7646 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 T.D. Poppendieck 7666 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Maurice & Bernelea Goeser 7526 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bruce Benidt 7555 Carnelian Lane tnen Prairie, MN 55346 Jack & Carol Wheeler,&er:\ 7575 Carnelian Lane • Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dave & Lynn Schoenberger 7625 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Ken & Kathleen Halloran 7655 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 William & Julie Macs 7676 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Frank & Patricia Mahoney 7685 Carnelian Lane (0F.en) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jay & Patricia Anderson , 7686 Carnelian Lane (ocurrI) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Ken & Debra Potter \ 7695 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 C CrILIC Robert & Carol Kuechle 7705 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN $5346 Marlys Lehrke 7716 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 William & Donna Stanley 7736 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Fred & Susan Poulsom 7762 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Evelyn Kettlerk 91sa cc i oe,) 7790 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 k & Connie Mikelson 7473 Eileen Street (opt) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dick & Brenda MeCalley Ei!zee Cozzi Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Chuck & Ann Boline , 7543 Eileen Street Cad.So) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Thomas & Krystyna Ploszay 7564 Eileen Street Edcn Prairie, MN 55346 John & Cheryl GM 7706 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Daniel & Jean Christensen 7725 Carnelian Lane (open Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Residents 7740 Carnnlian I ane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jim Butler 7765 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Mildred G. Arp 7456 Colby Court Rie.n Prairie, MN 55346 Dave & Kristine Thur . 7484 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bob & Ranee Iianimaii 9505 Eileen 3tteci Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bill & Joann Foreman 7552 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jeff & Linda Rotsehafer 7576 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jim & Jane Daly 7715 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 David & Laurie Lore= 7726 Carnelian Lane (oPe rl Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Shirley Hobbs & Jane Killen 7756 Carnelian Lane (dor-24' Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Mark & Debbie Hoeve 7775 Carnelian Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Richard Williams 7640 Colby Court Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Robert & Mary Sauer 7488 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Robert & Melanie 1 -ransen 040 tlicen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Alan & Janet Olson 7555 Eileen Street (c.icr-42 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Gerald & Mary Pettipiece 7600 Eileen Street Eden Prairie. MN 55346 @me) Craig & Cindy Seholle 7f . Cileen Street EG- . Prairie, MN 55346 Garry & Mary Miller 7612 Eileen Street (c-"I"--1 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Tom & Lennice Keefe, 7615 Eileen Street 'c 'ase ' Eden Prairie, MN 55346 .2317 \ Steve & Renae Williams el. 7600 Heritage Road (At. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 :PHaCE FP:,: 612-296-3949 PAGE 04 Mr. & Mrs. John Norton \ 7624 Eileen Street (c Icte)" Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bill & Marilyn Bierden 7679 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 John & Bonita Webb (dose)" 7627 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Daniel & Kay Lee 7691 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 William & Ann Daly 7636 Eileen Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 John & Jeannie Simon _ A 7605 Heritage Road (do Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Laurin & Jean Leib , 7620 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Larry & Barbara Jensen 7661 Heritage Road (ote.") Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Fred & Donna Bollen 7690 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Bernie & Cindy Aldrich 7711 Heritage Road (cic 6e) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Keith & Margo Martens 7760 Heritage Road (c105,2-) Eden Prairie, MN 55340 Wayne & Ruth Schmaedeke \ 17511 Kilmer Avenue ((109z/ Eden Prairie, MN 55346 James & Geralynn Bluhni 7610 Heritage Road (cic'se) Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Robert & Ralene Anderson , 7640 Heritage Road (c 1050 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Judson & Jennifer Freed 7669 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Walter & Carol Scott 7691 Heritage Road (clfzEi2) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Donald & Beverly Sabinske 7740 Heritage Road (c Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Aziz & Razia Alduar 7770 Heritage Road CC-10 -1Q) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Guy & Linda Wcegmann 17590 Kilmer Avenue (t - Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Curt & Kathy Midthun 7615 Heritage Road (ciceoc) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Mark V. & Judy Kammer 7660 Heritage Road CGI°W. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dennis Hohn (c_1 05ey' 7680 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Cheryl Rudberg (dem) 7710 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Douglas & Jodi Morey _ A 7741 Heritage Road Cc-IcriV Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Larry & Linda Borlaug 17491 Kilmer Avenue Eden Prairie,Prairie, MN 55346 Dan & Roxanne Kloskowski 16545 Luther Way Eden Prairie, MN 55346 cb se).'‘ i4t,i-r=frc1)— Ellen Deist 7611 Meadow Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Chip & Deb C.arlson 7680 Meadow 1.itne Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Holly Cashin 7685 Meadow Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 F:HOUiE FAX 612-296-3949 PAGE 05 Ike & Barb Eisen Nita Beauvais Patricia Pierson 7701 Meadow Lane 7735 Meadow Lane 7760 Meadow Lane den Prairie, MN 55346 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Tom & Mar) Robertson 7765 Meadow Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Robert & Mary Schuchman 17241 Park Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55346 , Pat St Maggie 'Gentler 17281 Park Circle (CI °5C/ Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jeffrey & Sandra Square , 17300 Park Circle (cc ') Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Richard & Terry Jopke 17117 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Ross & Kristin Fruen 17140 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 William & Annette Lorntson 17158 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Chuck Bt Barb Nickolay 17195 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Robert Haugen 17190 Park Circle (.•pel -') Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Wendy Henry 17250 Park Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Kenneth & Jennifer Bodner 17290 Park Circle Cc lotA) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 William & Sheila Tipple 17100 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Robert & Rosetti Vaassen 17123 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Doug & Jennifer Smith 17146 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Don & Connie Lumby 17164 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Duruiley & Sally Mattke 17196 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Owen & Susan Anderson 17220 Park Circle (c oo-n) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 James & Susan Clark ' 17270 Park Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Carl & Kitty Choate,. 17299 Park Circle Cc:101%) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Jeffrey & Sandra Payne 17111 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Craig & Barb Puegner 17135 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 DuWayne & Diantha Banks 17152 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Earl & Cheryl Zent 17165 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Andrewegariy Flynn 17228 Round Lake Road ( Eden Prairie, MN 55346 B & Nancy Manzey L ) Round Lake Roadi"-°4" Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Lynn Burns 17235 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Leon & Linda Thomsen 17241 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 H01.16E Michael & Barb Anderson 17247 Round Lake Road (elo.52) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 lack & Rhonda Wiley 17266 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Charles, Sally & Chris Hive!), 17284 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Steve & Ronda Geiser , 17323 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 John & Elizabeth ICasid 17155 West 78th Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 FkX 612-296 -3349 Joseph & Rose Wehland 17259 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 William & Mary Matlock, 17272 Round Lake Road. Ye=rs.) Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Wayne & Cindy Ilo!brook 17290 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Arm Kispert 16765 West 78th Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Tom Ivers (Omn' 17221 West 7Rth Street • Eden Prairie, MN 55346 PPGE 06 Michael & Gale White 17260 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dave & DiAnn Jones 17278 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Gary & Kay Thomsen 17291 Round Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Carolyn Anderson 17065 West 78th Street Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Glenn & Deborah Fristed , 17247 West 78th Street Var-ti-ova. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 D. H. M. & Emma Eames 17345 %Vest 78th Street C60 7:4 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 'brown i ks35 kAer (5,_\051i) G. .1) t 7 C., .7. 5S3`41 1--1-2.00P33-1(CArtit (- - • , SS"(114 oifocfr-W•r'''6A tacra 1-21.0 ,c21 Zarb • •wrocki 112.01 ?n54-1‹. Csicr:17.) E 5S541e: Serru, VDrarsaieu k say V. Circle --)(i•Ao 2-) C P. 5S5-1(o 1.pyr.3 flrason 0..\ef i12:30 "Nr K Cc ULCCA), 4 •Irtne. 90,04 Circ14 1/43—oc•n CcicifieY 4 s'4('' 2371 G -b,tr-4 5u.e 7 -78 e _ s-5344, Tay% KOVC1 w,,e (oper) 1 -11V3 6 Nc MIA si r ,v,‘ 7-Q4-or /. ir 7441.14 4/0.9" /A, A 4,14 cli4c,tre.V fF4e re-ce 1 ; '" g /74 efri n-,-.0.• S-144 *-7„, .vc 4 414 1.1e, Pot Ire 4 L- E /r44...11.-•• C44 44a; 4 ,, -- ,f Ocr44.) .4 04T4••To.c. 44)A "'Vier ift 44./4 00a4'.94' ciARA 11/ Al Lit A r. A/ w I c dos ce:,44. 4' A a) diva filrft44ate sr AA ?gore- /v/0.-7, ohhomf rvi. T.: me. .41444' 15440,1*,./..r .44.1-41-de 71 017 Z ee.4.fre0 Aiz.1 .4.1"sevo,-77gAT re' c , Mer AtAirki ii,CZ* 4.1/Awl /ici f'et ew" A - 2 e_ 7-1(42.7- 7-4_ 06.0 /Sec 41# eAr 4e he r.r •fro p-c.r" Poo**n1-- CO If Oft 4U rive t4-/7" 44 dr.. 40 r- r fa,. R 4.)•// A„r ...e- '41 .6 h Are- L./0;re- 7-0 sz irr /To , • 4f0..- -4 A ' 4 g: 44- b.- re - A 7A c Rotelerj /.n ht.< a' A`"1", 41:14.414 77 VO 444 73 7 te. /IPA 41.4A I • CV 1,4.-14:- a 4' /;7 A - ar-k 4t. / ..54:pa I RHg_ISE FAX 61,2-2=n e•--2:?4* PAGE og PETITION TO Minnesota Department of Transportation Mayor and Council Members, City of Eden Prairie We are deeply concerned residents who reside near Highway 5 between County Road 4 and Mitchell Lake. Our neighborhoods were established well before current construction. We are extremely disturbed over the alarming increase in traffic noise beginning with the removal of trees on the south side of Highway 5. When the barriers and trees were removed from the north side the noise became even more pervasive and oppressive. It is now a constant end continuous loud roar during the commuting hours. We urge you to re-examine the assumption that our neighborhood would not be adversely impacted by noise after the reconstruction of Highway 5. We strongly urge you to provide noise mitigation measures now at this stage of the project when equipment and labor is available. ADDRESS c/( e, -2 2 v.=. _7‘ z Aer'6"'e t 77V/ /J V:11 A‘ct4L4c) -714/ 4,74 1a HP Rep. Sidney J. Pauly District 424 Hennepin County I RHOLISE FAX 612 -296 -3949 PPGE 0# Minnesota House of Representatives Robin Winesek. Speaker COMMITTEES: TAXES. PROPERTY TAX DivISION. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE S : LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS. LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES SU B C O M M I T T E E ; ETHICS COMMITTEE. TRANSPORTATION STUDY tioArto May 29, 1991 Commissioner John Riley Department of Transportation John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear John: I am forwarding to you an extensive petition that one of my neighbOrs brought over t o o u r h o u s e a couple of weeks ago. I have seat copies to our Mayor and City Council members John, as you know, State Highway 5 is torn up at the moment and if ever some re•thinki n g a b o u t m o r e noise mitigation is going to happen, It must be now. At the time most of the houses were built (1960s - another group in 1970s), our city guide plan called for Highway 212 to be in place - carrying the bulk of the East/West through traffic; and Highway 5 to aerie as a parkway type four lane for more localized or secondary traffic. The state had directe d t h i s p l a i t . P e o p l e n e a r Highway 5 had no reason to expect that they would be bearing all of today's East/West state traffic. (At the time 'our' house was built, Highway 5 was a wagon road • but that's another st o r y . ) W e p u t a large addition on our house in 1970, aftcr conferring with MaDOT and being told t h a t H i g h w a y 2 1 2 w a s imminent and would draw traffic from Highway 5. All that has changed, and this neighborhood is being asked to sacrifice more and more pe a c e a n d q u i e t for the convenience of trucks and cars. Once the berms and trees came down on both sides of the highway, the noise was gr_csoLen and frightened folks enough to ask for help. They are mainly worried about what d e g r e e of mitigation will be put in, upon completion of the improvements. They cannot envisio n e n o u g h b e i n g d o n e . During the design stage, there was smooth talk about not exceeding Federal rules - but is that going to be the case? Can more be economically done for sound control? You cannot Imagine the exponential increase in noise that our neighborhood has endure d . T h a t i s t o be expected during construction. But the petition was mainly gathered through th e w i n t e r , w h i l e t r e n c h e r s , haulers, caterpillars, bulldozers, loaders, etc. were frozen silent. Then traffic roar alo n e w a s u n e a r t h l y . When Don Sabinske showed up with this petition. I said I would pass it on to you an d c o p y o u r l o c a l officials. I would deeply appreciate any help you can possibly give us. Sincerely, Sidney Pauly State Representative District 42A SP/sb 17450 West nun Street. Eden Prairie. MInnesota st...346 (612)S37-25ea State Office Auitoino, St . Paul. Minnesota 55155 01121 290-7449 g3T1T Rep. Sidney J. Pauly District 42A Hennepin County I RHOLISE 612-296 -394 9 pADE Minnesota House of Representatives Robert Yams*. Sputa' COMMt7TEES: TAXES, PROPERTY TAX DIVISION: ENVIRONMENT A N D N A T U R A L RESOURCES: LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND METROPOLITAN AFFA I R S . L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T S T R U C T U R E S S U B C O M M I T T E E ETHICS COMMITTEE: TRANSPORTATION STUDY Af " r ° ^ May 29, 1991 1— Dear 2—: Recently you signed a petition concerning the noise on Highwa y 5 . I h a v e f o r w a r d e d everyone's names and the petition to the newly appointed Co m m i s s i o n e r o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n , John Riley, along with my personal letter to John (copy encl o s e d ) . I have sent a copy of the petition and a copy of my letter to M a y o r T e n p a s a n d e a c h Eden Prairie City Council person: Patricia Pidcock, Marty J e s s e ' ' , J e a n H a r r i s a n d D i c k Anderson. I have spoken personally with Commissioner Riley as well. It would not hurt if you would write a short, non-threateni n g b u t s i n c e r e l e t t e r o f concern, coupled with a request for help. to Commissioner R i l e y . J o h n R i l e y i s r e l a t i v e l y new on the job - (one of Governor Arne Carlson's first appoi n t m e n t s l a s t J a n u a r y ) - a n d i s absolutely excellent, thoroughly competcnt. Sincerely, Sidney Pauly State Representative District 42A SP/sb Enclosure 1 74 50 Waal 781I+ Sooat. Eden Plain* MInAxsolA 55348 • (6U) 937.2554 Sloe °nice 8.116ing, St Paul, Mmnasota 55155 (124446 0%* OES0). .jdr r.'4 Minnesota Department of Transportation Suite 411, Transportation Building 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota'55155 (612) 2.97-2930 fax (612) 296-3587 4-p Epiit ,AtT i;v1 CO "IA 'Mod e t- JOHN H. RILEY Commissioner September?, 1991 The Honorable Sidney Pauly State Representative 575 State Office Building. St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Representative Pauly: St,C,( STX1 ,11 4 ,A47- r Z-* onot r* A-- 4m 6,- A v 644 !PHOUSE 613-296-3a44 PH6E Thank you for your letter regarding noise mitigation along Trunk Highw a y ( T . H . ) 5 . At this time, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) i s p r e p a r e d t o monitor the noise levels at the Donald Sabinske residence, and we will contact him to Set up a time to do this. This will include not only highway noise but a l s o c o n s t r u c t i o n noise. Mn/DOT also will keep its offer to constnict a noise berm that would c o n n e c t w i t h t h e in -place berm on the east side of Heritage Road. To do this, however, would mean closing the access of Heritage Road to T.H. 5. This proposal was originally rejected by the neighborhood and the City of Eden Prairie. If Heritage Road is to remain open, Mn/DOT must keep adequate sight distance in the area where the noise berm ends. This would create a gap in the berm which would allow the noise level s t o r i s e s l i g h t l y higher than if there was no gap in the barrier. The removal of the trees on the south side of T.H. 5 should have no e f f e c t o n the noise levels, because they were not located between the roadway and the houses in the neighborhood; therefore, they did not act as a noise baffler. Let me assure you that the completion of T.H. 212 is of the utmost importance to Mn/DOT to relieve traffic congestion and noise in this area. We have the first project scheduled to be let in 1993. rqual 0;41..1. y .optoycr I FHOUSE FH ?4En PPGE 06 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Dove, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to 593-8538 Telephone No October 9, 1991 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Sabinske 7740 Heritage Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (-137 RE: Noise Concern S.P. 2701-28 T.H. 5 Dear Mr. & Mrs, Sabinske: This letter is a follow-up to our letter written to the Representative Sidney Pauly concerning the above referenced project. An acoustic noise survey (see attachment) was conducted on October 8, 1991. The results of the survey are as follows: LlOdBA Monitored Daytime LlOdBA Standard 55.0 65.0 The noise levels are in compliance with state noise standards (see attachment) at this time. A copy of this letter will be forwarded to Representative Pauly for her information. I hope this answers your questions about the noise levels at your home. If you have any further questions concerning the noise level please feel free to call me. - Si es"W. Hansen Noise Abatement & Air Quality Supervisor Attachments: Acustical Survey n Noise Standards Letter to Honorable Sidney Pauly cc: Honorable Sidney Pauly Vlis SOTA 2an01 A.. Sketch Plan View /Wats:: irdierld • .• • • • • • • TN) --------- I . • :7:7: 7E:p Skip, Cross Soat1011: . ... ... „ . .... ACOUSTICAL SUFWEV SHEET Survey Crews Equipment Type Serial No. Calibration Pate Metering Unit 2231 1277080 Microphone 41= 126549O Calibrator 4E30 12756i5 Locatlmm S.P./C.S. 2.70/4,1/0C1.-4,Y rks Spmod Limit Site Location WOMM_Pe SAgM4-404 1941, 140443e. •-• 4Arov &c n 1 i..'HUIS,'LE F I n:=1::-.z;,t - L.3-1? PAGE 04 ACOUSTICAL SURVEY DATA) . Dow Times Weather, Temperature Win Speed R. Direction (show on sketch Traffic 10 minute count of trucks over 10,000 G.V.W. 1 . --- 3. 44 /o 8-11 7:40Art 4k5 1r oF IF MF 46ML- MPH MPA MPH , mpH M1111n11..11M• n••n•••••• Microphone Calibratio n Before time 'After time ..Acoustic .levolo- L(eq) L( 10) • L( 0) db db db db 21.111. •••n•nnnn=all• TILL- db db db db VAL 1.11.:nn••n• dbA dbA• dbA dbA dbA dbA clOA • •,-••n• dbA JILL dbA • dbA • .dbA -. • dbA L(90) 1,d 11 bA dbA dbA dbA go 0 1FHOUSE FAY. 612-2%-3949 PPGE PO 1/ TABLE 1 -- Noise Abatement Criteria Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibe l s ( d B A ) 1 / Activity Category Leo(11 lao(h) Description of Activity Category A 57 60 Lands on which serenity and quiet (Exterior) (Exterior) are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intend- ed purpose. Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals. Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or 8 above. Undeveloped lands. Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, end auditoriums. 67 70 (Exterior) (Exterior) 72 75 (Exterior) (Exterior) 52 55 (Threrior) (Interior) 1/Either Lio(h) or leq(h) (bUt not both ) m a y b e u s e d o n a p r o j e c t . The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency' s ( r C A ) stenderds for noise level control are: TABLE N2 NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS----MPCA Classification Land Use Daytime Noise Level Nighttime Noise Level (7AM to 10 AM) (10 PM to 7 AM) NAC-1 Residential 1.10 of 65 dBA 1.10 of 55 dBA NAC-2 Commercial L10 of 70 dBA L10 Of 70 dBA NAC-3 Industrial to of 80 dBA Lio Of 80 dBA Cr4- IT, -SAQ&1 V•SZ le_Sa nSI,S2-KAr-A+1 \)&- VY,AS1 L.Q.CXAX1 kLA, Czi4Ju- aepn O__Qf- O cio.1 1-1t (,, .X.) < ° CA9Lvalz_+ os)--0 C-(onACI 2-r-v•S'S) CkA). UnSkr- N4),4kk Cf2Q-A‘ LA)G k46-c3 hkesiskoisk 2-eQ- 0,-NS LA.n 0 z_02- 1--vArt, 0.9ASQL,—, 0_ IN, cko (Acist Nf-Qk-S fr• r ciasi& p C,so c Qv. L Ga.° LtJA-S. - T-Us-4k-d° C312 C LJ cAdNA)-.. c5NAJ - t‘ Lik") ot_QO tT ,n LoA L.4,1*,e-o-sAt V-D Ko u3-0A9-\.,2 Ck_Qc Lko\---a-% (•.-SUnQ LA3 \,\ —<3°)-e-tiLP V cS6191 Cle) t--9 cA-D-A,U2N ---c--- (i.4),k . a y--V.,c),-, ,,,>-4.k 0,,.< vv i PvA-s EvQ__)\_ ,9 "-:-- (.,./,.0 ‘- c),) , u, c:Lc;\&)., ci\-. L&s ,-1- Loo1/4, ' \--(4s,-1-, ..-f-•(Q-D Q-Q6D-° Lo,‘ A€ cQtcA- 144 .A)zxl, (Wc& 4-/A) ), a, 9412 aL (,-Vto ituA) 4 'x. 4.6/.)---Aa_Ad.,1 e.a,,g_t/te; n (,/ ,41 Viettd /c6a4prbz2ZL-e,., , ; 231 S aic:/bLAde.&221-4) eg-td )7e2,0 L-Ed. cz&teeZ (Z -er(eze_66- ,y,e4 t_zo Itutz--6 C t-e-e,Le_2e /26(/ a.* ,42'Lel de ke-Ode Le,76 • ac.e2(/ bfriLe-L .wkti- , 7. „ezziWu... :A.&oC 4t.2-'. .V-e:Aita-4, ig tI ; I 23-7-7 "I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: John Franc, Finance Director and Sara Ruth, Accountant DATE: 10/31/91 SUBJECT: Adjustment to the 1992 Proposed Enterprise Funds Budget An additional $14,000 is requested for Water and Sewer data processing costs in 1992. Staff has been informed by LOGIS that the City will be charged a $14,000 system development fee in January 1992 for work on the new utility billing system to be installed during 1992. This charge will be shared equally between the Water and Sewer Funds. Over the past few years LOGIS, a mainframe computer applications provider for a group of metro cities, has been planning a complete over-haul to its financial systems - General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Receipting, Fixed Assets, and Utility Billing. Participation in the cost for first four applications has been built into the past and current LOGIS rate structure. Participation in the cost of the Utility Billing system however has been structured as a one-time fee. This budget request will be entered on page 5 (Water Fund accounting division data processing expense) and page 14 (Sewer Fund accounting division data processing expense) of the 1992 proposed enterprise funds budget at $7,000 each. This budget request will increase the planned use of retained earnings for each fund in 1992 by the same amount. An updated summary statement for each fund is attached. CITY CF EDEN VRAIRIE 1972 ENTERFRISE FINDS ELEGET WATET( FIND aPPlaRY Actual Actual Budget Proposed REICGMTI 1990 6/30/91 1Y91 1992 1992 WATER SPLES SALE OF MEIEhS FENALTY CPPF8ES OTHER CFERIATING RtivErILEs SP11PLING C÷..7(ERPL, ACCOMITING TREATNBIT pularisLuDGE wATER (.ELLS LATLIR STOR4-16E Pt ttk READING et BEF'AIR SYSTEM MAINIDIAICE CCITFINEF.T.ICY DCPRECIATICN CAPITALIZE 00IJIP FURCHASES 1,579,775 50,829 9,679 7,271 11,944 36,382 1,062,346 178,093 1,432 97,275 234,957 46,160 (35,864) 617.723 17,605 4,119 1,100 4,474 104,972 17,900 35:8,456 89,602 092 34,503 128,633 1,589,YX) 50.000 10,100 1,600 16,400 227,000 39,400 1,026,4(X , 175,300 26,7(X) 97,000 ag0,70) 1,634,(Xx) 50,0(.0 10,2co 1,600 16,100 245,600 1,073,700 140,300 71,800 126,4(i0 303,100 -50,000 51,0(0 47,4(..0 ) 1,634,000 50,000 10,200 1,600 16,100 245,600 45,800 1,073,7(X) 140,700 71,800 126,400 303,100 70,000 51,060 (47,400) 48, 5(x0 (17,998) (26,900 ) $1,655,554 6 640,552 61,651,200 61,895,800 $1,695,800 CF-RATING EXPENSES $1,854,054 $ 721,514 $1,910,500 $2,056,400 $2,056,400 CFERATING IMEVE(LOSS) $ (198,5(x)) $ (80,962) 6 (259.30))' (360,600) $ (760,600) INFEREST ON INNESIT'ENTS 79,922 INMFEST ON SPECIAL ASS1IT1 9,0(4I GAIN ON CAE OF FIXED ASSETS RET \ 544 \ 'IF' 75,000 /5 „ k X) 75,000 10,000 (XX) 10,000 204,500 316,000 316,0(x) EERTING REVENLES $ 89,763 $ $ 2E9,5(0 $ 401,000 $ 401 „ 0(X) TI(C443-:ER TO GO•TA_ FIND 20,000 30,000 40,0)0 40,0(A) NEI INLITE(LLES) $ (128,737) 6 (0,962) 2oo $ 4(X) 6 400 rm -14.1 ot ' CITY CF EDEN EPAIRIE 1992 EIVIEFFRII. FUNDS EtiCEET SEMI; 11111) SUIlloRY Actual Actual Iludget Proposed Recornm 1990 6/30/91 19-11 1992 1992 SEWER SALES 2,172,719 1,105,260 2,242,5)0 2,305 0 3(K) 2,305,300 SYSTEM ACCESS CHARCS (1XSA(2) 3,094 3,00) 3 ,000 3,000 FEN1LTY CHAFSES 13,471 5,688 14,0)0 14,000 OTI-ER 425 400 400 400 EFFRATING RESENLES $2 0 189,709 $1,110,948 $2,259,800 $2,322,700 $2,322,700 EEMERAL LIFT STATIONS SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CONTINGENCY CEFFECIATION CN EGUIPMNT CAPITALIZE EQUIP PURCHASES OFERATIN.i EXPENSES 1,867,950 27 0 126 46,214 193,673 41,032 (13,245) 974,136 1,954,900 2,122,500 13,383 31,2(0 67,800 24,333 131,700 106,800 84,154 191,700 316,300 20,000 43,0)0 45,000 (12,716) (92,80)) (209,500) 2,122,500 67,800 106,800 316,300 20,000 45,000 (209,500) $2,162,7) $1,0N3,290 $2,259,700 $2,468,900 $2,468,900 CPET<ATINI3 INCavE fir-S) $ 26,959 $ 27,658 $ 100 $ (146,200) $ (146,200) USE U2 FETAINED EARNINGS 147 ,0(4 147,000 I\ET INCLVE 26,959 $ 27,658 $ 10) $ SOO $ 800 AY(-)