HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/21/1991CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
QN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TUESDAY, MAY 21, 1991
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson,
Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director
John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris
Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Roberta Wick
TUESDAY, MAY 21, 1991
COUNCILMEMBERS:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION OF AN AWARD OF MERIT FOR DR. GOWN WRIGHT. D.V.M.
pRESENTATION Or COMMENDATION TO 'MISTY L. LAUER
RECEIVE GOVERNOR'S SAFETY AWARD FOR THE HIGHEST QUALITY SAFETY PROGRAM
Page 913
PRESENTATION or KEY TO CITY FOR SHARI GRAHAM FOR POSSIBLE SISTER CITY Page 919
PROGRAM WITH CHINA
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MINUTES
A. Board of Review Meeting held Thursday. April 18. 1991 Page 920
Page 932
C. City Council Meeting held Tuesday. May 7, 1991
Page 941
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. EATON INDUSTRIAL ADDITION by The Eaton Corporation. Page 952
Approval of Developer's Agreement. Location: 15151
Highway 15
B. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday. April
23, 1991
City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page Two
B. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF EATON INDUSTRIAL ADDITION -
located South of T.H. 5 and North of Technology Drive
(Resolution No. 91-111)
C. MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S (MHFA) MINNESOTA CITY
PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPP) by the City of Eden Prairie.
Adoption of Resolution No. 91-121, Authorizing the City
of Eden Prairie's participation in the Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency's Minnesota Cities Participation Program
(Resolution 91-121 - Authorize Participation)
D. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
E. CENTER CARE PR GRAM
F. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF COFFMAN WOODS - located east of
Duck Lake Road and south of W. 62nd Street (Resolution
No. 91-122)
Page 955
Page 958
Page 961
Page 962
Page 985
G. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF MINNESOTA VIKINGS - located at the Page 987
N.W. Corner of Washington Avenue and Viking Drive
(Resolution No. 91-123)
H. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STARING LAKE/RIDGE Page 989
ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT. I.C. 52-203
(Resolution No. 91-124)
I. APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUNRISE CIRCLE Page 990
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 52-205 (Resolution
No. 91-125)
J. APPROVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH EDWIN AND Page 991
DOROTHY SISAL PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOT 5, BLOCK 3, CREEK
KNOLLS. FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON WILD DUCK PASS
K. RESOLUTION NO. 91-126 AMENDING THE SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST Page 994
INDENTURE FOR THE STERLING PONDS MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
PROJECT (PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS) TO ALLOW INVESTMENTS
OF BOND FUNDS WITH THE APPROVAL OF 50%0F THE BONDHOLDERS
L. APPROVAL OF CITY'S INSURANCE FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 1. 1991 Page 995
- JUNE 1, 1992
M. APPROVAL or EXTENSION OF LEASE FOR PRESERVE CENTER LIQUOR Page 100(
STORE
City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page Three
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. HIWAY 494 RACQUET CLUB by Northwest Racquet Swim and Page 1001
Health Club. Request for Zoning District Change from
Rural to C-Corn on 2.7 acres, Site Plan Review and
Adoption of Resolution No. 91-81, Preliminary Plat of
19.53 acres into 1 lot and 3 outlots for construction of
a parking lot and tennis court structures on the south
side of the property to be known as Hiway 494/Crosstown
Racquet Swim and Health Club. Location: East of Baker
Road, north of Holasek Lane (Ordinance No. 12-91 -
Zoning District Change; Resolution No. 91-81 -
Preliminary Plat)
B. ANAGRAM INTERNATIONAL.by Ryan Construction Company. Page 101(
Adoption of Resolution No. 91-100, Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment and Planned Unit
Development District Review with waivers on 15.67 acres;
Zoning District Amendeent within the 1-2 Zoning District
on 15.67 acres, Site Plan Review and Adoption of
Resolution No. 91-102, Preliminary Plat of 15.67 acres
into 4 lots for construction of a 199,210 square foot
office/warehouse building in three phases to be known as
Anagram International, Inc. Location: southeast corner
of Valley View Road and Executive Drive. (Ordinance No.
13-91-PUD-5-91 - Zoning District Amendment; Resolution
No. 91-100 - PUD Concept Amendment; Resolution No. 91-102
- Preliminary Plat)
Page 1011
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY HOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. Reports of Councilmembers
B. Report of City ManaCer
1. Set Date for Stage I Session of Quality Management
Program
C. Report of Finance Director
1. Recommendations regarding Liquor Operations Page 912
(continued from May 7, 1991)
City Council Agenda
May 21, 1991
Page Four
2. 1st Ouarter Budget ReDOrt (continued from May 7,
1991)
D. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation &
Natural Resources
1. Proposal for Repair of the Barn on the Rilgy/
Jacques Homestead
E. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Authorize Traffic Study for T.H. 169 Signalization
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
Page 101S
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Doug Tenpas and the City Council
TutRouG It Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Sandy Mitchell, Police Department Secretary, for the Eden Prairie Police
& Fire Awards Committee
DATE: May 3, 1991
SUBJ ECU: May 21, 1991, City Council Meeting/Awards Presentation
The Police & Fire Awards Committee would like the Mayor to present two awards at the
May 21, 1991, City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. before the regular business meeting begins:
1. The Committee would like to honor Dr. John Wright, D.V.M., with an Award of
Merit. Dr. Wright, who recently retired, has served as the Police Department's
veterinarian since the Canine Unit was formed in 1981. Dr. Wright has never
charged the Department for his services or supplies.
The Award of Merit is "awarded to a member for an outstanding accomplishment
which has resulted in improved administration, improved operation, or substantial
savings in manpower (specifically Eden Prairie's) or operational costs where the
member has gone far beyond the requirements of the normal assignment to
contribute to more effective and efficient police or fire service The Committee
feels that Dr. Wright fits this definition.
2. A Commendation is to be awarded to Kristy L. Lauer for her participation in the .
arrest of a 24-year-old female suspected of Financial Transaction Card Fraud. On
March 24, 1991, Kristy, an employee at Afterthoughts at the Eden Prairie Center,
handled a credit card charge. She was later informed that the credit card she
accepted was stolen. On April 16, 1991, a customer (the suspect) came to
Afterthoughts to purchase some items by credit card. Kristy Lauer became
suspicious when she noticed a big stack of cards in the customer's possession.
Looking closer at the customer, Kristy realized she was the same person from the
March 24 incident. After the customer/suspect left, Kristy immediately notified the
Police. The responding officer was able to apprehend the suspect. An inventory of
the suspect's property uncovered 20 stolen cards. Over $1,000 had been charged on
the stolen cards. If Kristy Lauer had not gotten involved and called for Police
assistance, this suspect would have continued to victimize more businesses here in
our City as well as in others. Investigative Aide Pauline Sager of the Police
Department has been contacting the major credit card companies as Kristy is
eligible for up to a $100 reward for the recovery of the cards from each of these
companies. Many of the companies will be forwarding the reward checks here
payable to Kristy Lauer. Pauline does not believe Kristy is aware of the reward
money and would like to present Kristy with the checks as well as the
Commendation award.
Mayor Doug Tenpas and the City Council
May 3, 1991
Page 2
Invitations to attend the awards presentation will be extended to family members of both
recipients, representatives from Homan, representatives from Afterthoughts, members of
the Police and Fire Departments, the Police Canine Unit and their dogs, and local media.
Copies of the awards to be read before the Council will be forwarded to you prior to the
May 21 meeting.
cc: Spence Conrad, Fire Chief
Police Administrative Staff
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Doug Tenpas and the City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Sandy Mitchell, Police Department Secretary, for the Eden Prairie Police
& Fire Awards Committee
DATE: May 8, 1991
SUBJECT: May 21, 1991, City Council Meeting/Awards Presentation
As promised in my memorandum of May 3rd, attached are:
1. A copy of the Media Release on the Awards Presentation scheduled for the May 21
City Council meeting;
2. A copy of the Commendation letter to be presented to Kristy Lauer; and
3. A copy of the Award of Merit letter to be presented to Dr. John Wright.
Enclosures
cc: Spence Conrad, Fire Chief
Police Administrative Staff
4IC
MEDIA RELEASE
For more infoimation:
Lieutenant Les Bridger
949-6200
Awards Presentation
Eden Prairie, MN, May 13, 1991 -- There will be an awards presentation given by the Eden
Prairie Police and Fire Awards Committee at the Eden Prairie City Council meeting to be
held on May 21, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. before the regular business meeting begins. City Hall is
located at 7600 Executive Drive.
Eden Prairie businessman, DR. JOHN WRIGHT, will be presented an Award of Merit for
his many years of dedicated assistance to the Police Department as veterinarian to the Police
Canine Unit. Dr. Wright, who has recently retired, has provided these services without cost
to the City.
KRISTY L. LAUER, an employee of the Afterthoughts store located in the Eden Prairie
Shopping Center, will be awarded a Commendation for her participation in the arrest of a
24-year-old female resident of Minneapolis suspected of Financial Transaction Card Fraud.
The suspect used a credit card which later proved to be stolen to make a purchase and
approximately three weeks later returned to the same store to make a purchase using a credit
card taken from a large number of cards in her possession.
Kristy Lauer recognized the suspect from her prior contact and notified the Eden Prairie Police
immediately after the suspect exited the store which led to the arrest in the Shopping Center.
Twenty stolen credit cards and over $1,000 in unauthorized charges were later discovered. The
suspect was involved in similar incidents in other communities as well.
CITY OFFICES / 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE! EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-3677! TELEPHONE (612) 937-2262
Spencer Conrad
Fire Chief
May 21, 1991
Dr. John Wright, D.V.M.
AWARD OF MERIT
In 1981, the Eden Prairie Police Department decided to form and maintain a Police Canine
Unit. Since the Canine Unit was first formed, you have been the Department's veterinarian.
You have maintained the health of the Department's dogs, doing the routine care as well as
handling emergencies. You have made yourself available whenever a handler needed help or just needed a question answered. On more than one occasion, you did not hesitate to refer
the dogs to the University of Minnesota for critical or expert care. You served as Department
veterinarian from the first dog through each succeeding one to our current dogs. That is service
to a total of five dogs including the Department's current two dogs. During the entire time
you have served as Department veterinarian, you have never charged the Department for your
services or supplies.
On behalf of the City, the Police Department, and the Canine Unit, thank you.
Keith J. Wall
Cheryl Petersen
Chief of Police
Awards Committee Chairperson
qi?
Spencer Conrad
Fire Chief
918
CITY OFFICES! 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE / EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-3677 / TELEPHONE (612)937-2262
May 21, 1991
Ms. Kristy Lauer
COMMENDATION
As an employee of the Afterthoughts store at the Eden Prairie Center, you handled a
transaction in which a stolen credit card was used to make a purchase. Because the suspect
had left the store before you learned the card was stolen, you appropriately informed the Eden
Prairie Center management so that other merchants would be aware of the incident.
Less than a month later, you were again working when the same suspect attempted to make
another purchase with a stolen credit card. You observed a large number of credit cards in
the suspect's possession and recognized her from the previous incident. After the suspect
stated she had no driver's license, the sale was terminated and the suspect left the store. You
immediately called the Police and provided a description which an officer used to locate the
suspect still in the Center. Following the arrest, 20 stolen credit cards were recovered with
applied credit of well over $1,000. However, if not arrested, the suspect would have continued
to charge purchases on the stolen credit cards.
Due to your attentiveness and willingness to become involved, the suspect was arrested and
prevented from victimizing other businesses in Eden Prairie as well as in other communities.
On behalf of the City of Eden Prairie, we commend you.
/c4iLtlak
Keith J. Wall
Cheryl Petersen
Chief of Police Awards Committee Chairperson
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Carl J. Julie, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Schmieg, Director of Inspections, Safety & Facilities
SUBJECT: Governor's Outstanding Achievement Award in Occupational Safety
DATE: May 17, 1991
The City of Eden Prairie has received the 1990 Governor's Award for Outstanding Achievement
in Occupational Safety. The Outstanding Achievement Award is given to members of the
Minnesota Safety Council in recognition of outstanding accident prevention performance and a
continuing outstanding record in the area of safety. The City also received the award in 1989.
Since the inception of a formalized City-wide safety program in 1988, significant strides have
been made within the City to improve the level of safety of our employees. The City's program
is comprised of a highly effective employee/management safety committee and a very dedicated
safety inspector. Together, they investigate safety-related problem areas, make recommendations
for safer work practices, review accidents and work to develop a safety consciousness among
City employees. The work they have done has made a significant impact on both the number
and severity of lost time injuries. In 1987, the City had a record high 2,976 lost time hours.
In 1990, this number was reduced to 112.
The City of Eden Prairie not only receives a benefit from safety by decreasing productivity losses
and improving employee morale, but also receives a substantial monetary reward for its
investment in safety. Due to a much improved loss record in workers compensation claims in
1990, the City received a refund check from the League of Minnesota Cities Trust for $150,734.
THINK SAFETY FIRST
City of Eden Prairie Workers Compensation Claims
1989 1988 1987 1986
(6 MO.)
LimmIMIIMIII THINK SAFETY FIRST
\LSI
EDEN PRAIRIE
chamber 01. c,„,,.(.c
May 13, 1991
Carl Jullie
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Carl,
On June 9, 1991, I will be leaving for mainland China to teach for three months. Part of
my responsibilities will be to lecture. With the information you have provided I will plan
two or three lectures on the City of Eden Prairie, its government, business community and
its social, recreational and residential community.
I plan on meeting with the heads of the government of the city I will be assigned to. It
would be a pleasure to be able to present them with a "key" to Eden Prairie. Hopefully,
I'll be able to return their key to Eden Prairie. It would be exciting to have a sister city in
China.
Please present this to the board for me as an agenda item. I will promise to do my utmost
to be a good ambassador for Eden Prairie.
Sincrely ,
"ari Graham
Director
/v1
q
250 Prairie Center Drive, #130 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • Phone 612-944-2830
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BOARD OF REVIEW
THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 1991
BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS:
BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF:
7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Chairman Douglas Tenpas, Richard
Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen,
and Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City
Assessor Steve Sinell, Hennepin County
Representative Larry Miller, and
Recording Secretary Jan Nelson
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: All members were present.
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Tenpas.
City Manager Jullie stated notice of this meeting had been
properly published in the Eden Prairie News and had been included
with each valuation notice sent to homeowners. Tenpas explained
the purpose of the meeting, reviewed the procedures to be
followed during the meeting, and explained the process for
further appeal by property owners.
Jullie said the Board is required to reconvene within 20 days of
this meeting to hear any appeals continued from tonight's
meeting. He said each appellant would be notified of the date
and place of the second meeting.
II. ORDER OF BUSINES
A. Personal Appeals
1. ARNIE FJELLAND - Appeal resolved.
2. RICHARD & CATHERINE ELLENSON
The Ellensons were not present.
3. GORDON STODOLA
Mr. Stodola said he was appealing the valuation on the
portion of his property that has been classified as
Residential Homestead Secondary since 1983. He
Liao
Board of Review 2 April 18, 1991
distributed a map showing the layout of the area. He
said the valuation of $35,000 is much higher than
similar properties he researched and that there are
drainage problems on the property, partly because of
the development around his property.
Sinell said this is a 1.8 acre property adjoining their
primary residence, and the only issue appears to be the
value of the property. Sinell said they would like to
have the appraiser and the Engineering Department take
a look at it and give an opinion on the problems.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Stodola property, PID 05-116-22 42 0003, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
4. DENNIS NORDBERG - Appeal resolved.
5. JOHN DAVIS II -
Mr. Davis said he had appeared before the Board of
Review in 1989 to appeal an increase from $159,000 to
$184,000. He said he asked then that his valuation be
on a parity with his neighbors and that tonight he is
again asking for parity.
Davis referred to his letter of April 1, 1991 which
showed market value and square footage figures for
several similar style homes in his area. He noted that
his home is 16% larger than the average of those
similar homes, but it is valued over 26% more than
those homes.
Sinell said the location and over-all quality of the
home is considered in addition to the size. He said he
would like to have an appraiser complete a review of
the property and share the results with Mr. Davis. He
noted that the Board set the value of the property in
1989 and that value hasn't changed.
Pidcock asked when the last on-site valuation was done.
Sinell said it was done in 1989.
Davis said he had offered to have staff perform a
review but they said it wasn't necessary. He said he
didn't understand why they now want to come back to
review the property at this point.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Davis property, PID 24-116-22 43 0036, to staff for
further review.
Tenpas said he would like to see the Council take
action on some of these requests tonight. He said he
q;,1
Board of Review 3 April 18, 1991
would be inclined to go with the proponent's estimated
value of $160,200.
Jessen asked if it was standard practice to not do the
market comparisons on a property until after the first
Board of Review meeting. Sinell said notices are sent
to 14,800 people every year and staff resolves as many
appeals as possible before the meeting in order to
limit the number having to appear at this meeting. He
said in this case a preliminary review of the property
indicated that the valuation of $184,000 was
supportable.
Harris said it would be useful to have information on
recent sales in the neighborhood.
Anderson called the question.
Vote on the Motion: Motion carried with Tenpas
opposed.
6. ANDRZEJ PECZALSKI -
Mr. Peczalski said he thought the value of his property
should be $129,400 because of the fact that recent
values have not changed that much. He said the value
was increased to $132,400 a few months after he paid
$126,000 for the property and the only improvement he
has made is central air conditioning. He presented
figures on several properties in his neighborhood that
have sold recently which he used as a basis for his
requested value of $129,400.
Sinell said they would like to continue working on an
appraisal of this property and to check out the
comparables Mr. Peczalski referred to.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Peczalski property, PID 25-116-22 41 0039, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
7. GERALD & ROSE ANN JENSEN -
The Jensens were not present.
Sinell said they asked this to be considered their
written appeal. He said staff is working on a market
comparison and would like time to complete that.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to refer
the Jensen property, PID 07-116-22 42 0040, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
Board of Review 4 April 18, 1991
8. FRED PURCELL -
Mr. Purcell said he had no complaint with the valuation
of his house; however, recent street improvements and
development in the area have caused drainage problems
on his land. He said they now have water in the
basement because they are getting drainage from a
larger area.
Purcell said he would like the drainage pipe upgraded
and moved to the property line; or, alternatively, he
would like a reduction of $9,600 in the valuation of
his land.
Jullie asked Purcell if he had seen a copy of a memo
from City Engineer Alan Gray to Steve Sinell that was
just written today addressing storm drainage on the
property. Purcell said he had not.
Sinell said this appears to be a two-part appeal:
one would be the market value of the property assuming
there is no drainage problem affecting the property;
and the other determining whether the drainage issue
has had a negative effect on the value of the property.
He said they are working on a market comparison and
just received the memo from Gray, so they would like
this referred back to staff.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to refer
the Purcell property, PID 21-116-22 22 0024, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
Tenpas noted that he would like to see the resolution
of the drainage issue before the assessing department
handles it.
9. STANLEY & GRETCHEN DORR - Appeal resolved.
10. BRUCE & KATHY RIEMER -
The Riemers supplied a list of homes in their
neighborhood whose valuations did not increase as much
theirs did. Mrs. Riemers said their market value was
increased to $158,000 immediately after they purchased
the home for $151,400. She said that was lowered to
$152,800 after they protested the increase; however,
this year the value was again increased to $155,700.
She said they have added a deck to their home, but
several homes in the neighborhood that have added decks
have not had an increase in their valuation.
Sinell said staff found several comparables in the
neighborhood that would sustain the $155,700 valuation
Board of Review 5 April 18, 1991
and asked that this be referred back to staff to put
the appraisal together with the comparables and return
to the Board at the next meeting.
Anderson asked if the assessor had been through the
home. Mrs. Riemer said the assessor was out for the
initial assessment and came out the other day to
measure the square footage of the home from the
outside.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris to adjust the
valuation of the Riemer property, PID 22-116-22 12
0028, to $153,000. Motion carried unanimously.
11. LEONARD KODET -
Mr. Kodet was not present.
Sinell said this property was reviewed at the Board's
direction in 1990 and in 1989. He said the value was
set at $90,700 by the Board in 1990 and that is still
short of what the house would probably sell for. He
said they have found comparables that indicate a value
range of $95,000 - $102,800 in the neighborhood.
Sinell said Mr. Kodet is asking that the valuation be
set at $85,000 because of the adverse effect of such
things as the Eden Prairie Road congestion and no City
sewer and water.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain
the estimated market value on the Kodet property, PID
04-116-22 23 0039, at $90,700. Motion carried
unanimously.
12. RONALD ANDERSON -
Anderson said the appraiser was out last week and
reduced the value by $7,000, which he considered a step
in the right direction. He said that lots in their
neighborhood are generally selling for less than the
purchase price. Because of that he said they feel the
lot price should be lowered; however, the appraiser was
reducing the house value by $7,000.
Anderson also said that there was a house in his
neighborhood that has gone through five growing seasons
without any lawn coverage and it is now an eyesore
because of the erosion damage.
Sinell said they are working on comparables for this
property and have found a range of $252,000 - $270,000.
He said the suggested value of $245,000 would be a
fairly consistent value with the comparables.
aq
Board of Review 6 April 18, 1991
MOTION: Pidcock moved to accept the appraiser's
suggested valuation on the Anderson property, PID 16-
116-22 33 0010, to $245,000.
Motion died due to lack of a second.
MOTION: Harris moved to adjust the estimated market
value of the Anderson property, PID 16-116-22 33 0010,
to $243,000.
Harris withdrew the motion.
Tenpas asked what the average increase in value was for
Eden Prairie. Sinell said it was a little over 1%.
Pidcock said it was 1.4%.
Jessen asked what improvements have been made to the
property recently. Anderson said they have put about
$17,000 in the house; however, he wanted the value of
the land to be reduced.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust
the estimated market value of the Anderson property,
PID 16-116-22 33 0010, to $240,000.
Motion carried unanimously.
13. LOUISE & DALE SCHURLE - Appeal resolved.
14. MICHAEL & KATHLEEN HAMILL - Appeal resolved.
15. MICHAEL PAN -
Mrs. Pan said they object to the lot valuation because,
although their lot is the smallest in the neighborhood,
it is valued at $58,000 which is more than most of the
other properties.
Tenpas asked how much the land valuation went up.
Sinell said the land is now valued at $58,000 and it
was valued at $48,900 in 1990.
Harris asked why there was such a large jump. Sinell
said the neighborhood was one that was revalued this
year, and many times values in a neighborhood will show
fairly large increases when the revaluation occurs.
Sinell said he would like to have it referred back to
staff to finish the appraisal and to specifically
address the size of the lot.
Anderson asked if there has been a general evaluation
in property adjacent to water areas. Sinell said
properties on lakes are appreciating at a much faster
LIRS-
Board of Review 7 April 18, 1991
rate than similar property off the lake, and the same
is true to a lesser extent for other properties with
similar amenities.
Pan said she didn't understand why there was such a
large range in the neighborhood since her valuation is
$5,000-$10,000 more than her neighbors.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Pan property, PID 17-116-22 21 0017, to staff for
further review.
Anderson said he would like to have some information on
lakeshore property valuations when this comes back to
the Board because he has received phone calls on this
situation.
Vote on the Motion: Motion carried unanimously.
16. MARSHALL SIMONS -
Mr. Simons said his property has an estimated value of
$73,000 and he just bought it in October for $68,000.
He said he thought the purchase price should indicate
the value of the property. He said they upgraded the
carpet for $700, so he thought the valuation should be
$68,700.
Sinell said this was a purchase of a previously
foreclosed property. He said they have sales in the
area with purchase prices of $72,700-$82,900.
Tenpas said he thought the fair market value should be
what the purchase price was, especially for such a
recent sale.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust
the 1991 estimated market value of the Simons property,
PID 15-116-22 33 0015, to $70,500.
Jessen said he didn't see the object of splitting the
difference with the property owner since it was such a
recent purchase. Anderson said he thought the sale
price is only one of the criteria, and such things as
distressed sales and other circumstances must also be
considered.
Sinell said he understood the property was foreclosed
and the Simons bought it from the VA.
Vote on the Motion: Motion defeated with Jessen,
Tenpas and Pidcock opposed.
qc,,(0
Board of Review 8 April 18, 1991
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust
the 1991 estimated market value of the Simons property,
PID 15-116-22 33 0015, to $68,700. Motion carried with
Anderson opposed.
17. RAYMOND RICE -
Mr. Rice said he has made no improvements to his
property and yet he had a 12% increase in valuation.
He said the Board decreased his valuation to $325,000
in 1989 and he didn't think it should have been
increased from that value.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to defer
discussion on this property. Motion carried
unanimously.
18. DONALD & YVETTE PATON
Sinell said this was a written appeal and staff would
like time to complete the review.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Paton property, PID 17-116-22 13 0025, to staff for
further review. Motion carried unanimously.
19. RAYMOND & CHRISTINE MURRAY - Appeal resolved.
20. ROBERT WIENS -
Mr. Wiens said his valuation was reduced by the Board
in 1989 to $128,300. He said there have been no
changes to his house except that there is now a house
to the left that was graded so that it drains onto his
property and blocks his view. He showed pictures of
comparable homes that he had completed research on.
Sinell said this entire neighborhood was reviewed for
the 1991 assessment. He said their preliminary
information indicates a range of $165,000-$175,000 for
this property. He said some of the properties in this
area have very positive views and others don't. He
said staff would like to complete the appraisal of the
property and do research on the comparables Mr. Wiens
provided.
Wiens said he thought $30,000 worth of view was out of
line.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Wiens property, PID 05-116-22 14 0057, to staff for
further review. Motion carried unanimously.
Board of Review 9 April 18, 1991
21. LONNY & ALISON GULDEN -
Mr. Gulden said he appealed his valuation last year and
the appraiser agreed that his property should be valued
at $185,000, with $52,500 for the lot and $132,500 for
the house. He said the entire area was reappraised
late last year and his assessed valuation went up to
$202,600. He said the land increased $12,500 and the
house increased $5,100. He said he didn't believe the
lot could have increased 24% in value in six months.
Gulden said his lot abuts Anderson Lakes Parkway
directly across from the athletic fields. He said the
property also adjoins land that is zoned for multi-
family.
Sinell said the Lake Heights neighborhood was revalued
this year. He said they did a market comparison of the
neighborhood and came up with a range of value from
$211,000 and up. Gulden shared information on other
comparables in the neighborhood that would indicate a
considerably lower value.
Sinell said he would like to check out the comparables
Gulden shared.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Gulden property, PID 23-116-22 13 0018, to staff
for further review.
Tenpas said he would like to see all of the information
Mr. Gulden provided included in the staff review.
Anderson said at one time the City brought in some
assessors as neutral parties for those situations where
there was disagreement. Jullie said there was a
difficulty getting people that are knowledgeable about
the market and that we discontinued the practice.
Tenpas said there is a great deal of subjectivity in
the appraisal business and we seem to have the same
problems every year with property owners presenting
comparable properties that substantiate their valuation
and staff presents the opposite. He said he thought it
was apparent that any changes we have made in the
process have not helped alleviate the problems.
Anderson said he thought we need an independent party
to come in and determine the right value. He asked
what it would cost to appraise an average property in
Eden Prairie. Pidcock said it would be about $150.
Board of Review 10 April 18, 1991
Tenpas said he thought we should look at a commission
or a body that has some experience in this area that
could review the appeals.
Vote on the Motion: Motion carried unanimously.
17. RAYMOND RICE -
The Board continued discussion of Mr. Rice's appeal at
this point.
Sinell said this property was part of a revaluation
neighborhood. He said they have comparables that
indicate a value of $423,000.
Tenpas asked how many houses there were on the cul-de-
sac. Rice said there are four.
Tenpas said he would like to see more comparables and
an analysis of the cul-de-sac showing the market values
for the rest of the homes.
Anderson noted that Mr. Rice had the option of
obtaining an independent appraisal to provide
additional information on his property.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Rice property, PID 17-116-22 24 0015, to staff for
further review. Motion carried unanimously.
22. MARK PETERKA - Appeal resolved.
23. ELIZABETH MCCARTNEY - Appeal resolved.
24. SCOTT ELFSTROM/LAKE PLACE APARTMENTS -
Appeal resolved.
25. MARRIOTT CORPORATION -
Sinell said they have additional information and need
to do a further analysis on this property.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to refer
the Marriott Corporation property, PID 11-116-22 44
0021, to staff for further review. Motion carried
unanimously.
26. RESIDENCE INN/MARRIOTT -
Sinell said they have received information on income
and expenses so they can perform a complete analysis.
Board of Review 11 April 18, 1991
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to refer
the Residence Inn/Marriott property, PID 11-116-22 43
0003, to staff for further review. Motion carried
unanimously.
27. DONALD BROMEN -
Sinell said this was a written appeal and they would
like it referred back.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to refer
the Bromen property, PID 11-116-22 42 0041, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
28. DENNIS & LORI CURRAN - Appeal resolved.
29. PENTTI LEHTONEN -
30. FREDERICK LAWRENCE -
31. ROBERT LUPO -
32. STEPHEN & JESSICA FOSTER -
34. LAURA LITTELL -
35. WILLIAM KEEGAN -
36. ROBERT P. KRUELL -
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the following properties to staff for further review:
Pentti Lehtonen
Frederick Lawrence
Robert Lupo
Stephen & Jessica
Foster
Laura Littell
William Keegan
Robert P. Kruell
Motion carried unanimously.
PID 35-116-22 12 0014 •
PID 24-116-22 21 0075
PID 24-116-22 21 0108
PID 02-116-22 12 0030
PID 24-116-22 32 0018
PID 07-116-22 14 0049
PID 02-116-22 12 0043
PID 06-116-22 32 0027
33. NATIONAL BUREAU OF PROPERTY ADMIN. (GE CAPITAL FLEET
SERVICES) -
Sinell said this was an appeal on multiple parcels and
they indicated in a letter that they want to retain the
right to continue their appeal to Hennepin County.
930
Board of Review 12 April 18, 1991
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain
the estimated market value on the following National
Bureau of Property Admin. properties:
PID 13-116-22 13 0005
PID 13-116-22 24 0012
PID 13-116-22 24 0013
PID 13-116-22 24 0014
PID 13-116-22 24 0015
PID 13-116-22 24 0016
PID 13-116-22 24 0017
PID 13-116-22 24 0018
PID 13-116-22 24 0019
PID 13-116-22 24 0020
PID 13-116-22 24 0021
PID 13-116-22 24 0022
PID 13-116-22 24 0023
PID 13-116-22 24 0024
PID 13-116-22 24 0025
PID 13-116-22 24 0026
PID 13-116-22 24 0028
PID 13-116-22 23 0003
PID 13-116-22 23 0005
Motion carried unanimously.
2. RICHARD & CATHERINE ELLENSON -
The Ellensons still were not present.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer
the Ellenson property, PID 17-116-22 12 0068, to staff
for further review. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Written Communications
Written communications received were included in the
Personal Appeals.
C. Schedule Reconvene
After discussion, the Board agreed to reconvene at 6:00 PM
on Monday, May 6.
III. CLOSE MEETING
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to adjourn the
meeting at 9:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
q31
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 1991
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard
Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin
Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
to the City Manager Craig Dawson,
Director of Planning Chris Enger,
Director of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Gene Dietz,
and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson
CALL-.14.....411LIER
Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
ROLL CALL
All members were present.
I. AEERQYAL_DE_AgENDA
Harris requested the following items be added under Item IV.
Other Business: IV. 1. Update on Status of City Hall; IV. 2.
Major Center Area Meeting; IV. 3. grant for Fitnesa Course.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the
Agenda as amended and published. Motion carried unanimously.
II. IXTR0DUCTION5
The following representatives introduced themselves: Jim
Kephart, Larry Samstead and Russ Sorenson, representing the
Lower Minnesota River Watershed District; Helen McClelland and
Aileen Kulak, representing the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed
District; Fritz Rahr, Susan Scribner and Howard Peterson,
representing the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed
District; and Bob Obermyer, engineer for the Riley-Purgatory-
Bluff Creek Watershed District.
III. DISCUSSION - ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
City Council Meeting 2 April 23, 1991
City Manager Jullie said the purpose of this meeting was to
share information on the status of several environmental issues
that the Council had identified as needing further review.
A. surface 'Qatar Ouality
Director of Planning Enger reviewed the activities of the
Board of Water and Soil Resources (BOWSR). He said the
purpose of the Board is to identify water-related problems
now and within a 20-year period, and the Board was created
specifically to have a centralized responsibility for
dealing with water issues. He described some of the
proposed regulations to deal with surface water runoff and
pollution that will be enforced by either the local
Watershed District and/or the local municipality.
Tenpas asked if the BOWSR Board was a state or county
organization. Peterson said it is a 12-member state board
and he has been a member of it since its inception.
Peterson related some of the history behind the creation
of the Board.
Jessen asked who will make up the implementor's committee
for the new rules. Scribner said the task force will be
made up of about 65 people, including representatives from
the Watershed Districts, the cities, the engineering
organizations and the conservation districts.
Tenpas asked how the Board is handling the economic impact
of the rules. Scribner said they have formed a
subcommittee to get information back from the cities about
such issues. Tenpas commented that phasing the rules in
would help to ease the impact of the regulations.
Jessen asked how the Watershed Districts felt about the
working relationship with the city regarding such things
as review of development projects, overall stormwater
management, and floodplain protection. McClelland said
she felt the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District has an
excellent working relationship with Eden Prairie.
Sorenson said the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District
also has a good working relationship with the City.
Jessen asked how we are doing on revising the shoreland
ordinance and on floodplain management. Scribner said the
bluffs setbacks have been a concern to the Riley-Purgatory
Creek Watershed District.
Rahr said they have a concern about testing of heavy
metals in the water. Jessen said it would be important to
have up-to-date information on lakes with public beaches.
Howard said Riley-Purgatory Creek has directed their staff
to get some numbers on the lakes in their area and that
information could be shared with the City.
c)"3
City Council Meeting 3 April 23, 1991
B. Wetlands - "No Net Loss Policy"
Enger reviewed two bills before the legislature that will
move the DNR from management of wetland areas to
protection of wetland areas to ensure that there is no
further loss of wetlands. He said they are expanding the
wetland categories, and he showed a map of Eden Prairie
with the areas marked that would be included in the new
categories.
Jessen said he thought no net loss was a great policy but
there has not been much of a program to go along with it.
He said he thought we have to find a way to determine
those areas that are most valuable and then manage them
for that purpose. He said he thought we need bigger
wetland preservation areas away from the cities.
Anderson said we have lost tremendous amounts of our
hills, woodlands and lakes and he thought we need to look
closely at the development of the southwest part of the
city so that no uncompensated loss of wetlands occurs
there.
Returning to the previous discussion of Surface Water
Quality, Anderson said he had a real concern with a recent
survey that showed the Mississippi River to be one of the
most polluted rivers in the country, and that the greatest
source of pollution starting in the Twin Cities area is
the Minnesota River. He asked how we would start the
process of cleaning up the Minnesota River.
Enger said the Metropolitan Council Technical Advisory
Committee on the Lower Minnesota River was set up to deal
with that issue. He said he believes from the
investigations of the committee that the nutrient
pollution of the river comes from agricultural areas
outside the urban area, while the heavy metal pollution is
higher in the urban areas.
Director of Public Works Dietz said he thought one of the
problems is that there is not a program going on in the
rural areas, and this may be a key to solving the
Minnesota River problems. Peterson said the MNRAP program
is attempting to define the sources of pollutants in the
Minnesota River. McClelland said she was concerned that
industrial waste and raw sewage are still being dumped
into the Minnesota River upstream.
Jessen said he was concerned with erosion control in the
City and what we could do together to improve that.
Peterson said he thought it came down to the relationships
with the developers. A discussion followed regarding how
the City monitors and follows up on erosion problems and
qq
City Council Meeting 4 April 23, 1991
how our procedures might be changed to better deal with
problems.
C. safe Drinking Water Act
Dietz reviewed the information in his memo of April 19th
concerning the Safe Drinking Water Act. He said some
testing was done in 1987 and that, in general, we did not
have a particular problem at that time. He said the
ruling on lead that will be coming out may cause some
problems with the water supplies in individual homes. He
said another rule coming up regarding radon may also
affect the City, depending on the regulations included.
He said there is an RFP out for additional testing and
that testing should be completed by late summer.
Jessen asked how many of the contaminants and chemicals
were tested for in 1987. Dietz said he thought it was
over 70.
Harris asked if well water used by individual homeowners
is tested on a periodic basis. Dietz said they don't
administer such a program so it is left up to the
individual homeowner. Pidcock said both the well and
septic system must be tested if the homeowner is selling
the property. Jessen said well water testing might be an
appropriate article for the newsletter, perhaps when the
results of the City testing are published.
D. River Bluff Protection
Jullie called attention to the draft memo on the Minnesota
River Bluffs Study included in the packets and the
recommendations included in that draft. He said he had
checked with the City Attorney about how we can enforce
erosion control. He said the City Attorney found that our
building code provisions allow us to go onto a property
and make corrections if we determine that a public safety
hazard exists. He said we could probably determine that
significant erosion was a public hazard situation.
Jullie said we may also be able to regulate with the
zoning code, developers' agreement conditions and the
settlement agreement with the owners of the landfill.
Harris asked if the staff recommendations will be on the
agenda for a regular Council meeting. Enger said that
this draft is very early in the process and that meetings
with commissions and property owners have not yet been
held. Jessen said he would also like to see a status
report on how we are doing on those things that the
Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge Act set
forth. Enger said the recommendations in the memo are
nearly identical to those set forth in that act.
City Council Meeting 5 April 23, 1991
E. Landscaping
Jullie said there has been ongoing concern about watering
and irrigation of landscaping. Tenpas said he thought
that there should be some minimum landscaping requirements
for development. Pidcock noted that there are sprinkling
systems available that can be shutoff while it is raining.
Harris said she thought we should be looking at
alternative ways of landscaping that would not require
extensive watering in order not to penalize individual
homeowners. Jessen said he thought we should look at the
whole system and come up with something that doesn't
increase the costs of development and homeownership.
Enger said we require landscaping on all but single-family
developments, and on single-family developments we require
some type of cover. Anderson asked how much time they
have to do that. Enger said that is not prescribed and
they go back on an individual basis to determine a
schedule with the homeowner to establish the cover.
Tenpas said he thought we should suggest that developers
include at least minimal landscaping so that homeowners
can pay for it as part of their mortgage. Pidcock said
most developers put grass on the front and side yards, but
often leave the backyards for the homeowners to take care
of.
F. Engineering Standards
1. Street Design
Tenpas said he wanted to talk about cul-de-sacs
because the issue comes up frequently. He said
Minnetonka has a lot of cul-de-sacs and they haven't
experienced a lot of problems with them. Anderson
said the City Council made a decision to limit the
use of cul-de-sacs about four to six years ago on
advice from public safety, the engineering department
and the school district.
Harris said she thought you have to look at the use
of cul-de-sacs on a case by case basis, and that the
principal concerns are safety and traffic flow.
Tenpas said he thought there should be some
flexibility on the Council's policy for those cases
where a cul-de-sac makes more sense.
Harris said she would prefer to have Staff follow the
policy and then have the Council deal with the issue
on a case by case basis. Pidcock said she agreed.
City Council Meeting 6 April 23, 1991
Tenpas asked if Staff was comfortable with the policy
regarding cul-de-sacs. Enger said Staff is quite
comfortable with the policy of no unnecessary cul-de-
sacs; however, he thought the problem we do have is
with the 75 dead-end roads that exist in the City.
2. Drainaae Design
Dietz reviewed the City's drainage plan including the
design of the storm sewer system for a ten-year
frequency event and the design of the retention
facilities and floodplain areas for the 100-year
frequency events. He said we have the advantage of
the creek system that forms the backbone of our
drainage system in Eden Prairie thereby avoiding the
elaborate pipe systems some communities must install.
Anderson said he was concerned about direct drainage
from streets to lakes. He said there is more and
more run-off from the parking lots and streets that
is having an adverse affect on our lakes.
Dietz said the next budget will include a line item
to hire a consultant to look at water quality. He
said the idea of a storm water utility will be
studied to pay for some of the water quality issues.
Samstead said the Lower Minnesota Valley Watershed
District has put in a request that developers put in
a skimmer mechanism to help control some of the water
run-off. Sorenson commented that the skimmers then
have to be maintained. Dietz said the city has put
in sump manholes and has the equipment to clean them;
however, they have a problem with where to dump the
dredgings.
At this point the representatives of the various
organizations were excused, and the Council continued
the discussion regarding street design.
Jessen said he thought fewer streets, narrower
streets and fewer curbs would be better and would
give us the opportunity to protect and conserve water
by not requiring an elaborate storm drainage system.
Harris said she was concerned that narrower streets
would pose a safety hazard for pedestrians,
especially school children, in those areas where
there are no sidewalks. Anderson said he thought we
need to look at some kind of parking restrictions
that would help safeguard pedestrians on narrower
streets.
qfl
City Council Meeting 7 April 23, 1991
Pidcock said there are certain areas that are very
congested. Dietz said there seems to be a trend to
smaller lots and shorter driveways in recent years,
and we may well end up with more on-street parking.
Dietz said perhaps Staff could do a study on this
situation and present some alternatives to the
Council sometime this fall. Tenpas said he would
like to take a look at environmental issues as they
relate to street width.
Jessen said he was suggesting that we balance up
traffic, safety, and environment and make the
decisions on the basis of a well-informed discussion.
Anderson said he thought parking lots are also a
problem and that we should take a look at the whole
problem of parking in the City.
3. Boulevard Treeg
Anderson said he has received some information on the
beneficial effects of boulevard trees, and he thought
some of our streets should be planned with boulevard
trees. Tenpas said he would be in favor of having
one in every front yard. Pidcock said she felt very
strongly that we should have them. Anderson said he
thought that we need to find out how to go about
putting them in effectively.
Enger said we would have to work with the Engineering
Department as the boulevards are packed with
underground utilities. He said he would suggest that
the City prescribe where the tree is placed so that
the boulevard tree would actually be planted on
private property and the City would then not have to
get involved in the maintenance of boulevard trees.
4. Street Lighting
Pidcock said at one point we were considering special
lighting for the Major Center Area. Dietz said there
was a memo written by Staff that dealt with some
design standards for the MCA including the street
lighting. He said we have several options; however
the $577,000 budgeted for those lights will not pay
for lighting on all the streets. He said that a
special assessment might be necessary, or we might
have to cut down on the number of streets with that
special lighting.
Pidcock said she has received calls regarding street
lighting particularly from the older sections of the
City. Dietz said they have had some controversy over
this issue and they now require a petition with
virtually everyone's name on it to put lighting in
City Council Meeting 8 April 23, 1991
the older neighborhoods so they can be assured that
they all want the lighting.
Referring to Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Lambert's memo of February 25th regarding
environmental issues, Jessen said he thought there
were several good suggestions in that memo regarding
what can be done to protect the environment. He said
he thought there should be special emphasis put on
those suggestions and on other environmental issues
in the City newsletters.
IV. OTHER susibigss
1. Update on Status of City Hall Site
Jullie said they are looking at the CPT building in some
detail so they can report back on that. He said they need
some more information from Welsh in order to firm up the
land valuation question for dealing with Mr. Naegele.
Harris asked if there is any date on that. Tenpas said it
is difficult to coordinate schedules but negotiations
should be done by May 15th.
2. Major Center Area Meeting
Harris said she thought we need some structure regarding
the meeting with the participants in the MCA. Jessen said
he had in mind to have a couple of Councilmembers, some
Commission members, Staff, and property owners from the
area between Hwy. 169 and Purgatory Creek get together to
address the concept of the Purgatory Creek Recreation
area. He said he thought we need to discuss whether the
property owners are willing to work with the City to
produce something special in the area.
Enger said there are 172 property owners in the MCA, and
he thought the question was whether to include all owners
or to focus it down. Jessen said he thought it was
important to limit the area and the focus.
Jessen and Anderson volunteered to serve as Council
participants.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to appoint
Jessen and Anderson to serve on the MCA Subcommittee.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Grant for Fitness Course
Harris said she saw a vita-type course at Elm Creek that
was put in with a National Fitness Campaign Grant
Committee grant. She said she would like to investigate
getting such a grant for the City. Lambert said he would
City Council Meeting 9 April 23, 1991
check on it further; however, we obtained funding from
them for the one at the Middle School and he thought there
was a limit of one per community.
4. Zlectromagnetic Fields under Power Linea
Pidcock said she had seen some information on the effect
on health and the environment of electromagnetic fields
under power lines, and she would like to have Staff get it
so the Council could be prepared for the next time NSP
requests more power lines. Lambert said he would look
into it.
V. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjourn the
meeting at 9:10 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
(mu
TIME:
LOCATION:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
7:30 PM Tuesday, May 7, 1991
City Hall Council Chambers,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris,
H. Martin Jessen and Patricia Pidcock
City Manager, Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning
Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
All Councilmembers present.
PROCLAMATION FOR SENIOR AWARENESS WEEK (Resolution No. 91-119)
Mayor Tenpas read the Proclamation of Senior Awareness Week, May 13-20,
1991. A copy of the proclamation was accepted by a group of senior citizens
on behalf of all senior citizens of the City.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda.
Jullie requested the addition of Item VII.B Request from TriCor
Investments (Resolution No. 87-91) Jullie also requested the addition of
Item IX. A., Appointment of Council Representative to the Eden Prairie
Foundation Board.
Harris requested the addition of three items under X.A.,Reports of
Councilmembers: (1) Graffiti Bridge; (2) Solid Waste; (3) Board of
Review. Pidcock requested the addition of two items: (4) Disability
Awareness Week Acknowledgements; (5) High-Voltage Wires. Jessen
requested the addition of one item: (6) Report of Council Subcommittee
on MCA. Tenpas requested the addition of one item (7) Correspondence
from United States Marine Corps.
Under X.B. Report of the City Manager, Jullie requested the addition of
two items: (1) Proposal from Setter, Leach & Lindstrom regarding a
possible Parks/Public Works maintenance facility; (2) Proposal for Quality
Management Program.
Motion to approve the agenda as amended approved 5-0.
441
Eden Prairie
2
May 7, 1991 City Council Minutes
Unapproved
II. MINUTES
A. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday,April 9, 1991
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson to approve the minutes of the
Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 9, 1991.
Motion approved 5-0.
B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 16. 1991
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the
City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 16, 1991.
Pidcock noted the following corrections: On Page 6 of the minutes,
Item C, the motion should read that the item was continued to the
May 7, 1991 meeting. On Page 9 of the minutes, Item X.A.1, third
sentence should read: " However, because of a prior commitment she
was not ....". On Page 10 of the minutes under Item X.B.1., the first
sentence of the motion should read "Jessen moved to authorize the
expenditure of additional money to obtain the necessary video
equipment." On Page 12 of the minutes, the first sentence of the
second paragraph should read: "Lambert said he did not believe that
the City could afford...".
Motion to approve the minutes as amended approved 5-0.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. FAIRFIELD 1991 AMENDMENT by Centrex Real Estate Corporation, 2nd Reading_ of Ordinance No. 10-91-PUD-4-91, Zoning District Amendment
within the R1-9.5 Zoning District on 23 acres: Approval of Developer's
Agreement; Adoption of Resolution No. 91-106. Authorizing Summary of
Ordinance No. 10-91-PUD-4-91 and Ordering Publication: 23 acres into
61 single family lots and road right -of-w ay to be known as Fairfield
1991 Amendment. Location: North of Stanley Trail, north of
Candlewood Parkway (Ordinance No. 10-91-PUD-4-91, Zoning District
Amendment; Resolution No. 91-106, Authorizing Summary)
B. Flat Approval of Bell Oaks Estate, located south of Riverview
Road in the south 1/2 of Section 36 (previously known as Timber Bluff) Resolution No. 91-108
C. Final Plat Approval of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 4th Addition, located
west of Eden Prairie Road and south of future extension of Scenic
Heights Road Resolution No. 91-109
(44
Eden Prairie 3
May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes Unapproved
D. Approve Agreement with Hennepin County for permanent easement
through Rail Line at Valley View Road
E. Approve Agreement with Soo Line Railroad Company for storm sewer
crossing
F. ROGER'S BODY SHOP - Authorizing One-Year Extension of the Term of
the Developer's Agreement for Roger's Body Shoo (Second Extension)
G. Release of Special Assessment Agreement with Kingston Ridge LTD
Partnership for the construction of Staring Lake Parkway
H. Revoke trunk utility assessments to George Schoers property in
Section 22
I. Approve conveyance of Outlet C, Red Rock Shores to Harry Rogers
J. Clerk's License List
MOTION
Anderson moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the Consent
Calendar. Motion approved 5-0.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
V. PAYMENT OF CLW_MS
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve payment of claims.
Payment of claims approved with Harris, Pidcock, Jessen, and Anderson
all voting "AYE".
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request from G. E. Capital Leasing for Goose Population Control
Jullie explained the concern of G.E. Capital Leasing over the goose
population on its parcel at the northwest end of Anderson Lakes. He
reviewed the history of removing geese in the area which had been
coordinated by Dr. James Cooper from the University of Minnesota.
G.E. Capital Leasing had requested the City's approval for an on-
going maintenance program to keep the goose population under
control. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
had discussed this item at its May 6, 1991 meeting and continued
qt/.5
Eden Prairie
4
May 7, 1991 City Council Minutes
Unapproved
review of the matter to a future meeting. Any recommendations
would await further analysis by staff.
Anderson said he would like to find a permanent way of dealing with
the goose population throughout the City. Tenpas agreed. Pidcock
said that Chanhassen had a plan for controlling geese and said she
would favor the City having such a plan. Jessen was also in favor
of finding a permanent City-wide plan to control the geese.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, that a permanent plan for
controlling Eden Prairie's goose population be developed by the City
before mid-June.
Anderson said he would like to see a recommendation from the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission for goose control for
the entire City, which would include the property of G. E. Capital
Leasing.
Lambert said that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission had recommended on a 6-0 vote that the staff develop a
plan for permanent control of the goose population in the City.
Motion approved 5-0.
MOTION
Jessen moved to approve the request of G. E. Capital leasing for the
removal of 6-8 pair of geese from its property this year only.
Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0.
B. Request from TriCor Investments (Resolution No. 9 1 -8 7 /
Jullie said that TriCor Investments was the partnership which
developed the Welsh Companies' office building. In 1983 the City had
authorized issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds to provide tax-
exempt financing for the project. Because this approval had come
prior to the policy adopted in 1986 which imposed the 1/8% fee on
such transactions, the project had been exempt from the fee. TriCor
was now negotiating a reduction in the interest rate it was paying,
and TriCor's financial documents require it to come back through
the City process. Because of Council action the 1/8% fee would
apply to this transaction. However, because this was simply a
change in interest rate, TriCor believed it was unwarranted for
the City to impose the fee and was requesting a waiver. The fee would
amount to approximately $2,000 a year.
q gut
Eden Prairie 5 May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes
Unapproved
Harris said she did not believe it was appropriate to make an
exception to the policy in this case. Anderson said he would not be
in favor of changing the policy at this time.
MOTION
Jessen moved to approve Resolution No. 91-87 to deny the request to
waive the 1/8% fee, and to consider the matter of charging the fee
during budget considerations for 1992. Seconded by Harris. Motion
approved 4-1 with Tenpas voting Nay.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS. & COMMITTEES
A. 1-494 Corridor Commission - Request for Council Endorsement of I-
494 Corridor Commission's TOM Beliefs and Goals (Resolution No. 91-
107)
Jullie said this was a request from the 1-494 Corridor Commission
requesting adoption of Resolution No. 91-107 regarding its Travel
Demand Management (TDM) beliefs and goals.
MOTION
Anderson moved to adopt Resolution No. 91-107. Seconded by Harris.
Motion approved 5-0.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of Council Representative to the Eden Prairie
Foundation.
JuHie said that the Eden Prairie Foundation required one of the
eleven members on its Board of Directors to be a City Council
representative. Councilmember Harris had represented the City for
one term. Since members typically served two three-year terms, the
Foundation had requested Council to make a reappointment.
MOTION
Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, that Harris be reappointed to
represent the Council on the Eden Prairie Foundation Board of
Directors. Motion approved 5-0.
91-1S
Eden Prairie 6
May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes
Unapproved
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. Reports of Councilmembera
1. Graffiti Bridge
Harris suggested that the City, together with the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Department and the Eden Prairie
Public School District consider something as a replacement for
function of the Graffiti Bridge abutments. She also suggested
selling pieces of the bridge as souvenirs. Pidcock and Jessen
said they believed it was an excellent idea. Anderson said he
would like to see a replacement for the bridge. Dietz suggested
consulting with the Police Department before it was decided to
designate a another place for graffiti. He said his hope was that
graffiti would not be allowed anywhere in the City after Graffiti
Bridge was removed.
2. Solid Waste
Harris suggested directing staff and the Waste Management
Commission to investigate what could be done to increase the
number of people participating in recycling in the City. Dawson
said the participation rate figures were rather misleading and not
necessarily an accurate measurement of how much recycling was
going on. The best measurement was to look at how much was
being taken out of the overall waste stream. He said multi-family
recycling should help bring the number of participants up.
Tenpas suggested referring the matter to the Waste Management •
Commission for response.
3. Board of Review
Harris said she believed consideration should be given to a better
way of achieving the goal of this type of review. She stated that
several years ago she had suggested that a group of individuals
with expertise in this area be empaneled, along with a group of
residents to evaluate this process. She said she would like to
request the staff to present several options for Council
consideration. She said that she believed expertise in financing,
real estate, and construction would be helpful. Tenpas said he
believed that Council should be represented because it was the
responsibility of Councilmembers to make decisions on taxation
matters. He said he would also like to see if there was a better
method that could be used. Anderson and Pidcock agreed.
Anderson suggested finding out what other cities were doing and
said he believed having an independent appraiser involved would
work very well. Jessen said he would like to explore other
gqo
Eden Prairie
7
May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes
Unapproved
options, but agreed with Tenpas that the Council was elected to
make such decisions.
4. Disability Awareness Week Acknowledgements
Pidcock said she was disappointed that there was no mention in
the City's official newspaper of the proclamation made at the last
Council meeting for Disability Awareness Week.
5. Electro-Magnetic Fields from High Voltage Wires
Pidcock asked if there was any more recent information on this
topic than that contained in the report from 1988. Jessen said
there was not. Pidcock suggested having a policy in place for
the next time the City was requested to allow placement of high-
voltage wires.
6. Development Plans
Jessen reported on a meeting held May 1, 1991 with owners of
undeveloped property in the Major Center Area. Councilmembers
Jessen and Anderson were present as well as Carl Jullie and
several staff members. The majority of the property owners were
also represented. He said it was clear that if the variances for
the proposed development on the Bermel property were approved,
development on the Teman property would follow shortly. One of
the property owners was interested in putting together a
partnership with other property owners for development in the
Major Center Area, and the results of this effort would be known
approximately 10 days. If a partnership was not formed, the
Council would soon be reviewing the proposal for commercial
development on the Bermel property. Anderson said he was
encouraged by the meeting. He said he believed the City should
consider initiating the development plans for the Major Center
Area.
Tenpas said he believed the City should be pro-active in
development of the Major Center area.
Pidcock said she favored encouraging development, but at the
same time, being careful not to lower any standards while being
pro-active in this regard.
Lambert asked if Council wished to send the letter proposed
several weeks ago to owners of property in the Purgatory Creek
Recreation Area. Jessen suggested holding the letter until the
end of the week of May 13. Council concurred.
(41
Eden Prairie
8
May 7, 1991 City Council Minutes
Unapproved
7. Letter from U. S. Marine Corps
Tenpas called Council attention to a letter he had received from
the United States Marine Corps which was soliciting community
action projects and stating it would be able work on several types
of construction and land-clearing projects. Tenpas requested staff
to keep the letter on file for any future needs the City may have.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Proposal from Setter, Leac_n tin ta_al itectural Firm
Jullie said the item related to a parcel of land which included a
building on the Eaton Corporation property, a 7.6 acre parcel with
a 66,000 square-foot building. Since the parcel was now for sale,
staff had investigated the potential of using the building for a
Parks/Public Works maintenance site since the present facility will
be lost to construction of the Highway 5-212/Mitchell Road
interchange. He said staff had decided it had some potential as
well as some problems. Staff recommended contracting with the
Setter, Leach and Lindstrom architectural firm for its
recommendation on the feasibility of using the building. The cost
of the study would not exceed $3,000.
MOTION
Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to authorize the expenditure of
$3,000 for a report on the building from Setter, Leach and
Lindstrom. Motion approved 5-0.
2. Proposed Quality Management Program
Jullie reviewed the plans to initiate a training program to promote
a sense of quality in customer service among City staff. He said
the strategy at this point would be to incorporate the ideas of
strategic planning, quality management, and customer service into
one package. The proposal would utilize the expertise of
consultants in the overall approach. The program development
would be undertaken in four stages: (1) Acquire an
understanding of the City as a service business. This phase
would consist of strategic planning involving the Council and
department heads. (2) Organization Assessment, which would
consist of interviews with department heads and several staff from
each department to get a sense of what quality management
opportunities existed. (3) Development of a quality improvement
structure based on the findings of the organization assessment.
Goals and new programs would be identified and the formation of
quality teams would begin. (4) Plan Implementation, which would
include skill-building workshops and management training for City
Eden Prairie 9
May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes
Unapproved
employees, utilizing resources from the private sector as
appropriate.
He said $24,000 had been allocated in the 1991 budget for training
aimed at the customer service area and the implementation of the
proposal would not exceed that amount.
The consensus of the Council was to support and endorse the
program as presented by the City Manager.
C. Report of Finance Director
1. Recommendations regarding Liquor Operations
Frane introduced Carol Olson and Jan McTavish from CJ Olson
Marketing Service, the consultants on the recommendation for a
location of a municipal liquor operation.
Olson and McTavish reviewed their findings through the use of
maps and charts. The report recommended the purchase of a site
for additional liquor operation in the Prairieview Center area while
keeping the existing stores in the present locations at Prairie
Village Mall and Preserve Center.
Jullie said staff was requesting authorization to employ a real
estate agent to negotiate for a site in the Prairieview Center area,
and if this were not possible, to search for a site in the Major
Center Area. He also said the lease at the Preserve Center Store
would expire on June 1, 1991 and a new three-year lease had been
offered with an optional two-year extension. The first two years•
would be at the present rate with an $0.18 per square foot per
year increase in subsequent years. The Prairie Village Mall lease
would expire in September, 1992.
Jessen said he was concerned about buying a site at the present
time because he believed planned construction in the area would
hurt business. He said he was not sure that a purchase of a site
was the best decision.
Anderson said he was also concerned about how much the
construction would affect shopping at the Rainbow Foods store.
Pidcock said she was concerned about the effect the new Cub
Store would have on Rainbow Foods and traffic in that area. She
suggested that putting the store near Lunds would be a better
choice. She also said she was concerned that the cost of land
would be higher in several years.
Eden Prairie 10
May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes
Unapproved
Tenpas said he would prefer a lease arrangement until it was
determined if the City could remain competitive and make a profit
with the liquor operation. He would recommend leasing space in
the Prairieview Center area. Anderson agreed.
Harris said she would favor a more cautious approach and would
favor leasing space in the Prairieview Center area.
After further discussion it was the consensus of the Council to
continue this item until the next meeting and requestcrifin
information from staff as to leasing costs and anticipa ed traffic
patterns.
MOTION
Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue this item to the
May 21, 1991 meeting. Motion approved 5-0.
2. 1st Quarter Budget Report
Frane presented the 1st Quarter Budget Report and briefly
covered the highlights. He introduced new Senior Accountant
Sara Ruth, the staff member who compiled the report. The
consensus of the Council was to continue this item for review and
discussion at the Council meeting of May 21, 1991.
D. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Award Contract for 1991 Bituminous Seal Coating. I.C. 52-228
Dietz Recommended that the Award Contract for 1991 Bituminous
Seal Coating be awarded to Allied Blacktop Company.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to award the contract for 1991
Bituminous Seal Coating, I.C. 52-228 to Allied Blacktop Company.
Motion approved 5-0.
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
Tenpas reported that Douglas Bryant from the Hennepin Parks Board
had expressed to him that he was pleased with the response from
Council at the last meeting to the presentation made by Hennepin Parks,
and Bryant said he would follow up with Council on suggestions made at
that meeting and on any new developments.
'ro
Eden Prairie 11
May 7, 1991
City Council Minutes Unapproved
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to adjourn at 10:35 PM. Motion
approved 5-0.
QS1
Eaton Addition
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1991, by EATON CORPORATION,
an Ohio corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for preliminary plat of 47 acres into two lots, all said 47
acres situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution #91-79, Developer covenants
and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows:
I. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and
approved by the City Council on April 16, 1991, revised and dated April 11, 1991, and attached
hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer
at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS, CONSTRUCTION AND FINANCING SCHEDULE AND
CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of:
A. Plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and
erosion control for the Property.
B. A construction schedule and financial security for construction of the watermain extension
to Lot 2 on the Property.
C. An executed cross-access easement for the purpose of providing access to Technology
Drive for Lot 2 on the Property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those
improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
4. TECHNOLOGY DRIVE EXTENSION: City and Developer acknowledge that the exact
location and size of Technology Drive through the Property are not yet known. It is further
acknowledged that Developer agrees to dedicate the right-of-way across Lot I of the Property
to the City for such road extension in the future.
City and Developer agree, therefore, that within thirty (30) days of written notice to Developer
by the City that the right-of-way width and location for Technology Drive have been determined,
Developer shall dedicate to the City that portion of right-of-way determined by City in its sole
discretion to be necessary for the construction of the extension of Technology Drive through Lot
1 of the Property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer acknowledges that
Developer shall be entitled to no further consideration from City beyond the approvals granted
herein for such dedicated right-of-way.
95'3
Eaton Industrial Addition
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of the 'West half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Townshi
p
1
1
6
.
Range 22. described as beginning at the Northwest corner of the West One•half of sai
d
N
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
;
thence East along the North line of said West Ono-half of the Northeast Quart
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
corner thereof: thence South along the East line of said West One-half of the
N
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
Quarter a distance of 1672.64 feet; thence Westerly, deflecting to the right 80 deg
r
e
e
s
2
3
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
12 seconds, a distance of 231.32 feet; thence Southwesterly along a tangential c
u
r
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
l
e
f
t
,
with a radius 5829.58 feet. a distance 01 1097.89 feet, more or less, to the W
e
s
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
s
a
i
d
W
e
s
t
One•half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North along said West line 1908.8
3
f
e
e
t
,
m
o
r
e
o
r
l
e
s
s
,
t
o
the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Exce
p
t
t
h
a
t
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
o
f
shown as Parcel 220 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of
W
a
y
P
l
a
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
e
d
2747 as the same is on file and of, record in the office of the Registrar of
T
i
n
e
s
i
n
a
n
d
for said Hennepin County.
Subject to a permanent easement for public road right-of-way and utilities purposes per Dec. No. 4761105. over that part of the above described property lying south
e
r
l
y
o
f
a
l
i
n
e
p
a
r
a
l
l
e
l
w
i
t
h
and/or concentric with, and 35.00 feel northerly from the following desc
r
i
b
e
d
l
i
n
e
:
Beginning at the most northerly corner of Lot 3, block 2, EDEN PRAIRIE
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
.
according to the plat therof, on he or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota: thence South 60 degrees 33 minutes 33 seconds East. assumed basis Or
bearings, 441.63 feel along the northeasterly line of said Lot 3; thence e
a
s
t
e
r
l
y
5
4
4
.
1
6
f
e
e
t
o
n
a
tangential curve concave to the norih, radius 716.20 feet and central angl
e
4
3
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
3
1
m
i
n
u
t
e
s
59 seconds; thence North 75 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds East 1200 feet and there termil
u
t
i
n
g
qq
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-111
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
EATON INDUSTRIAL ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of EATON Industrial Addition has been submitted in a manner required
for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the
Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for EATON Industrial Addition is approved upon
compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated May 16, 1991.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 21, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
q /3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: May 16, 1991
SUBJECT: EATON Industrial Addition
PROPOSAL: EATON Corporation, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of
EATON Industrial Addition. Located at the southeast corner of Trunk Highway 5 and
Wallace Road, the plat contains 47 acres to be divided into 2 lots. Lots 1 and 2 contain
39.4 acres and 7.6 acres respectively.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council April 16, 1991.
This property is presently zoned I-5.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution May
21, 1991.
VARIANCES: Prior to release of the final plat a variance must be approved by the Board of
Appeals for a building setback less than 75 feet from a public road. All other variances
must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: As part of this project, existing sanitary sewer and watermain
facilities will be converted from private ownership to public ownership. In addition to
this conversion there will also be extension of public watermain to connect Lot 2 with
municipal watermain. Prior to release of the final plat the owner shall provide a
construction schedule and financial security for the construction of said watermain to Lot
2.
Access to Lot 2 will be provided across Lot 1. Prior to release of the final plat the
owner shall provide to the City proof of filing of the cross-access easement.
Final Plat of EATON Industrial Addition
May 16, 1991
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of EATON Industrial Addition
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following:
1. Receipt of Engineering Fee in the amount of $4,700.00.
2. Receipt of construction schedule and financial security for the proposed
watermain extension.
3. City Engineer's approval of inspection results of private utilities intended for
public ownership.
4. Receipt of cross-access easement for access to Lot 2.
JJ:ssa
cc: EATON Corporation
Ron Krueger & Associates
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #91-121
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE'S
PARTICIPATION IN THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S (MHFA) MINNESOTA
CITIES PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPP)
WHEREAS, The City of Eden Prairie is eligible to participate in the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency's (MHFA) Minnesota Cities Participation Program (MCPP) for the purpose of assisting first time home
buyers in purchasing homes in Eden Prairie.
WHEREAS, By participating in the MCPP the City will allow MHFA to access the City of Eden
Prairie's local government bond authority to sell bonds on behalf of the City Eden Prairie.
WHEREAS, The proceeds from MHFA's sale of mortgage revenue bonds will be used to provide below
market financing to low and moderate income first time home buyers.
WHEREAS, MHFA will incur bond issuance expenses that would have normally been incurred by cities
selling their own bonds.
WHEREAS, The City's total bond allotment will be $664,297.
WHEREAS, First Bank of Eden Prairie will originate the mortgage loans and will enter into contract
with MHFA as to loan origination requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that the City of Eden Prairie will participate in the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's
Minnesota Cities Participation Program and authorizes the City Manager to execute the MHFA Mortgage
Revenue Bond Allotment Agreement and Program Application-Commitment Agreement.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21st day of May, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning, David Lindahl, Planner
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
SUBJECT: MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S (MHFA) MINNESOTA
CITY PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPP).
DATE: May 11, 1991
The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has developed a new program to assist communities in
assisting first-time home buyers. In 1990, State lawmakers passed legislation which allows
MHFA to access local government revenue bond authority to sell bonds on behalf of cities that
identify local housing needs. The primary objective of the program is to provide affordable
mortgage financing for low-and moderate-income first time home buyers. To participate, cities
must arrange with local lenders to originate the loans under the program. Such lenders are
required to enter into a contract with MHFA as to program loan origination requirements. First
Banks in Eden Prairie has agreed to participate with the City in delivering the program.
Representatives from First Banks met with staff 1990 and expressed interest in participating in
delivering this type of program. They are the only bank in Eden Prairie currently participating
in the MHFA home mortgage program, which is nearly identical to the MCPP program. The
City can designate additional lenders to deliver the program in the future.
Thirty-seven communities and counties state-wide applied for $95,000,000 in revenue bonds
through this program, with the maximum set-aside for any one agency being $4 million. Eden
Prairie staff submitted an application for $1,000,000. Because there are only $39,000,000 in
mortgage revenue bonds available in the MHFA housing pool, all requests had to be reduced.
The final bond allocations were negotiated and finalized on May 7, 1991, at the MHFA offices
in St. Paul. MHFA presented a number of different options which reduced each communities
request in an equitable manner. Eden Prairie's bond allocation will be $664,297.
Some of the program highlights:
Eligibility Requirements: First time buyer (not owned within three years); adjusted
gross annual income - $35,500 (deduct $1000/resident of
unit).
Maximum Purchase Price: $97,840.
Interest Rate: From 1.5% - 2% below market mortgage rates at the time
of bond issuance (May 23, 1991).
City Participation:.
Eden Prairie is eligible to apply for this program, and based on the number of phone inquiries
received by staff, and applications sent out for the City's Scattered Site Housing program over
the last four years, the need for this type of program appears high. It is becoming increasingly
difficult for first time buyers to purchase homes in Eden Prairie with the current high cost of
housing. Through the MCPP program, the City would be providing ownership opportunities to
low and moderate income persons.
The City's primary role will be in marketing the program. The loans will be disbursed by First
Bank of Eden Prairie on a first come first serve bases, or any other equitable and fair method
of disbursement.
Request from Council:.
Staff has forwarded a deposit check for $6,664.97 and an application agreement to MHFA after
phone conversations with each council-member. The Council formally approved the use of the
deposit funds at the May 7, 1991, Council meeting. The deposit will be fully refunded after the
bond sales in late May.
Staff will prepare a resolution for the May 21, 1991, Council meeting, which authorizes the
City's participation in the program, and for final execution of all related agreements between the
City of Eden Prairie and MHFA.
9&0
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
May 21, 1991
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
BTO Development Corporation
Petroleum Maintenance
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
Builders & Remodelers, Inc.
Decks Unlimited
Enerjac Construction Co.
Felsenberg Construction Co.
Gilles Construction,Inc.
Einar G. Gilbertsen
Fred Jude Construction
Kopfmann Companies, Inc.
Darley G. March
Master Care Home Repair
Pierce Construction, Inc.
Schutrop Homes
C. A. Smith,Inc.
J. Paul Sterns & Company
UTILITY INSTALLER
Bjorlin Plumbing & Heating
Ron-Son Construction
SCAVENGER
Swedlund Septic Systems
PLUMBING
Advanced Plumbing & Heating
Affordable Plumbing
Bjorlin Plumbing & Heating
Central Plumbing
G & C Plumbing
Gezel Plumbing
Larry Olson Plumbing
The Plumbing Place, Inc.
So. Minneapolis Plumbing & Heating
GAS FITTER
Advanced Plumbing & Heating
Randy Lane & Sons Plumbing & Heating
Preferred Mechanical Services, Inc.
Residential Heating & Air
HEATING & VENTILATING
Preferred Mehcanical Services, Inc.
Residential Heating & Air
SEPTIC SYSTEMS
Swedlund Septic Service
PEDDLER
Nasrollah Soltani-Garmi(Blue Bell Ice Crean
Arnester Winans (water filters)
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
()
t licensed activity.
Pat Solie
Licensing
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
724,s_
DATE: May 16, 1991
SUBJECT: Center Care Program
In 1988, the City Council authorized the staff to initiate a Center Care Program to be operated
at the Eden Prairie Community Center on a trial basis. The program was contingent on this
being a "break-even" program, and providing a service to individuals that were using the Eden
Prairie Community Center, as well as encouraging people to use the Center and its programs.
City staff began to operate this on break-even basis only after expanding the program to allow
customers to drop off their children while they were using the City park or going shopping, etc.
Approximately 50% of the people that dropped their kids in Center Care were not using the
Community Center.
In 1990, the State informed the Community Center staff that as long as we were allowing people
to drop their children at Center Care and then leave the building, the Center Care program would
have to be licensed as a Day Care Center. The major criteria that changed the program was the
requirement to have a minimum of two staff on duty at all times.
Since this requirement was imposed, the Center Care program has consistently lost money and
is projected to lose approximately $3,000 in 1991, unless changes are made.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission have reviewed the information
provided by Lyndell Frey, Recreation Supervisor in charge of this program, at their April 1st
meeting and requested staff to provide a survey of users regarding increased fees, as well as an
annual application fee.
On May 6th, Mr. Frey returned with the completed survey and the Commission moved to
recommend that effective June 1, 1991, a $25 application fee will be instituted, which allow
Center Care users to pay a rate of $3/hour, while those not wishing to pay the application fee
would pay an hourly rate of $3.50/hour, with a $.50 reduction for a second child.
The Commission requested staff report back on October 1, 1991 to determine the impact of these
fee increases, and determine whether or not the Commission could support continuation of this
program for 1992.
City staff requests the City Council to approve the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission.
BL:mdd
9 /
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources
FROM: Lyndell Frey, Recreation Supervisor
DATE: March 27, 1991
SUBJECT: Status of Center Care Program
In August of 1990 the State informed us that if the City were to
provide a child care program for not only on site Community
Center users but the general public as well, our child care
service must be licensed. Because of much stricter paid staff
requirements, health consultants and other State requirements
Center Care has seen a consistent loss of income each month since
August of 1990. This report is to inform the Parks Commission of
the financial concern for Center Care and provides information on
the current financial and user statistics for the Center Care
program.
A brief history of the Center Care's program since its first year
of full operation may also help to inform the Parks Commission on
its recommendation for continuation or discontinuation or
modification of the program.
In 1988 a Center Care Director was hired to run the Center Care
program. Hours of operation were from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. and
served 2,100 users. Because of its long hours and 30 hour/week
director the 1988 Center Care program lost $4,275.
In 1989 major changes were implemented into the Center Care
program. 1) Reduction of hours available, to be centered around
our Aerobics and Aqua Aerobics Programs, cutting the hours back
from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. and making Center Care available from 9
a.m. - 12:30 p.m. and 5 p.m. - 7:30 p.m.. 2) Increasing the fee
50 cents an hour for both members and non members. Current rates
are $2.00/hr for members and $2.50/hr for non members.
3) Starting a parents advisory committee who organized a network
of volunteer parents who helped staff Center Care during peak use
times on Tuesdays and Thursdays. 4) Charging a $2.00 stipend for
each individual who signed up for the Aerobics and Aqua Aerobics
program. Due to the fact that these 4 items were addressed
Center Care served 2,770 patrons and turned a $508 profit in
1989.
Status of Center Care Program
March 27, 1991
Page 2
In 1990 Center Care usage dropp
e
d
t
o
1
,
5
8
7
u
s
e
r
s
.
A
l
t
h
o
u
g
h
u
s
a
g
e
was down because we were monit
o
r
i
n
g
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
a
t
1
staff to 5 children and taking a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
a
s
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
s
working with paid staff through
J
u
l
y
o
f
1
9
9
0
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
w
a
s
i
n
the red only $225.
Two major factors created the
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
$2,000 deficit the remainin
g
5
m
o
n
t
h
s
.
Factor #1: State Licensing and Staff Requirem
e
n
t
s
o
f
n
o
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
h
e
l
p
a
n
d
a
minimum of two qualified staff
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
a
t
a
l
l
t
i
m
e
.
F
a
c
t
o
r
#
2
:
In an attempt to actually gener
a
t
e
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
t
o
h
e
l
p
s
u
b
s
i
d
i
z
e
t
h
e
Center Care program an aft
e
r
n
o
o
n
e
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
D
a
y
C
a
r
e
f
o
r
Kindergarten Students was attem
p
t
e
d
.
D
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
f
a
c
t
t
h
a
t
o
n
l
y
3
children registered for this pro
g
r
a
m
i
t
w
a
s
a
n
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
i
n
s
t
e
a
d
o
f
a revenue producer. We gave the
3
p
a
r
e
n
t
s
a
m
p
l
e
t
i
m
e
t
o
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
afternoon day care for their c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
d
a
y
c
a
r
e
program was dropped in November
o
r
1
9
9
0
.
In the Recreation Supervisor's 1
9
9
0
y
e
a
r
e
n
d
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
t
w
a
s
s
t
a
t
e
d
that in April of 1991 a report w
o
u
l
d
b
e
g
i
v
e
n
o
f
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
a
n
d
its financial and user status.
W
i
t
h
S
t
a
t
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
are and the number of current C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
u
s
e
r
s
I
h
o
n
e
s
t
l
y
c
a
n
n
o
t
see Center Care running as a
b
r
e
a
k
e
v
e
n
v
e
n
t
u
r
e
.
T
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
is the 1991 financial and use
r
s
t
a
t
u
s
.
A
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
s
a
l
i
s
t
of options available and insigh
t
t
o
s
o
m
e
o
f
t
h
o
s
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
January 1991 Total Members 39, Non Members
6
7
,
T
o
t
a
l
U
s
e
r
s
1
0
6
,
Total Revenue $462.90, Total Expenses $794.71, Aerob
i
c
s
S
t
i
p
e
n
d
$90.00, January Deficient $241.8
0
.
February 1991 Total Members 55, Non Members
6
1
,
T
o
t
a
l
U
s
e
r
s
116,. Total Revenue $488.20, Total Expenses $766.71, Aero
b
i
c
s
S
t
i
p
e
n
d
$90.00, February Deficient $188.
5
0
.
Through March 18, 1991 Total Members 19, Non Members
4
4
,
T
o
t
a
l
Users 63, Total Revenue
$237.00, Total Expenses $430.00, Aerobi
c
s
Stipend $45.00, Through March 1
8
D
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
$
1
4
8
.
0
0
.
If the Parks Commission were to
a
l
l
o
w
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
a
s
is, it would cost approximate
l
y
$
2
5
0
.
0
0
per month to subsidize this program for the approxima
t
e
l
y
1
3
0
u
s
e
r
s
p
e
r
m
o
n
t
h
,
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
$3,000/year for 1,560 users.
Thoughts to be Considered
:
1) Should this program be sub
s
i
d
i
z
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
i
d
e
a
t
h
a
t
i
t
i
s
not only a se,cvice to the g
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
,
b
u
t
a
l
s
o
t
o
current members and users of no
t
o
n
l
y
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
b
u
t
a
l
s
o
various adult and youth programs
.
Status of Center Care Program
March 27, 1991
Page 3
2) Because Center Care's hours 9 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. and 5:00 -
7:30 p.m. the Center Care room can still be used for other
programs such as evening meetings, lifeguard training,
weekend birthday parties, etc. However, if Center Care were
to be closed entirely is there a better use for that meeting
room?
3) Is it possible to cut back hours or wages of Center Care
employees? Currently Center Care is required to have a
minimum of two staff on duty at all times by the State of
Minnesota. One of these two staff must have a minimum of a
teaching degree or equivalent in hours in child care
service. Our current Director is working at $6.50/hr with
all other staff working at $4.50/hr. In 1989 when Center
Care hours were cut, the reason they were adjusted to what
they are is two fold: 1) allow people enough time to run
errands outside the facility and 2) accommodate the people
using the facility during heavy class usage times.
4) Raise Fee Structure: At $2.00/hr for members and $2.50 for
non members our current rates are very compatible to what
other Drop in Child Care Services provide. If you compare
it to what other athletic facilities provide it is expensive. $1.00/child at Crosstown and $3.00 for a 2 1/2
hour stay at Flagship. Both facilities lose money on their
child care programs yet provide the activity as a service to
members only.
5) Increase Number of Users in Center Care: Starting in March
of 1991 various youth lesson programs will be run 4 days per
week for pre-school aged children, hopefully parents will
not only take advantage of a 1 hour lesson program for their
child, they will also use Center Care for that child's
brother or sister while again the parent may choose to run
errands or use the facility. For the months of March and
April a Kids Korner Program on Wednesday and Thursday will
run as well as a Youth Gymnastics program on Tuesdays and
Fridays. As a pilot program we hope this will help to
encourage a heavier Center Care usage.
Staff recommends that the Center Care program continue to operate
however, in 1988 when the Parks Commission allowed Center Care to
continue it was under the pretense that it be encouraged to run
at a break even venture. In 1989 Center Care operated under that
obligation. In 1990 State requirements incurred a larger
financial commitment in order for Center Care to operate with two
paid staff persons at all times. Staff has tried in a number of
ways to help offset the cost of Center Care but also realizes
( that Center Care cannot continue to be subsidized without
approval and monies available to run such a program.
Staff approximation would be $250/month or $3,000/year to serve
approximately 1,560 users of this program.
d/L
18563 Kristie Lane
Eden Prairie, MN 55346 April 22, 1991
Mr. Bob Lambert
Director of Parks, Recreation,
and Natural Resources
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Lambert,
I am writing you today out of my conce
r
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
child care program at the Eden Prairie
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
I
h
a
v
e
spoken with Lyndell Frey several times
r
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
a
b
o
u
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
Care, and have received a copy of his M
a
r
c
h
2
7
,
1
9
9
1
m
e
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
to you concerning the status of Center
C
a
r
e
.
I
h
a
v
e
a
l
s
o
completed the survey that he and Center
C
a
r
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
L
i
z
Thompson put together. I would like yo
u
t
o
k
n
o
w
h
o
w
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
Center Care is to me.
I have two children, ages 10 and 7 yea
r
s
o
l
d
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
both in nursery school or in the public
s
c
h
o
o
l
w
h
e
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
first opened, I have not been one of
t
h
e
h
e
a
v
y
u
s
e
r
s
t
o
d
a
t
e
.
I
have, however, had my 7 year old son i
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
o
n
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
days when school is not in session, ye
t
I
h
a
v
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
d
o
errands, or use the Community Center f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
This school year, with my youngest chil
d
i
n
s
c
h
o
o
l
f
u
l
l
d
a
y
s
,
I
became a member of the Community Center
s
o
t
h
a
t
I
c
o
u
l
d
l
a
p
s
w
i
m
in the mornings. My membership started
l
a
s
t
f
a
l
l
,
s
h
o
r
t
l
y
a
f
t
e
r
school began, and I have been at the C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
a
t
least four times a week since then. Re
a
l
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
,
i
t
i
s
n
o
t
possible for me to swim until I get my
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
o
n
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
b
u
s
at about 9 a.m. Thus, I typically wind
u
p
a
t
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Center some time during the morning whe
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
i
s
i
n
operation.
I am personally concerned about Center
C
a
r
e
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
w
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
having our third child this summer, an
d
I
h
a
v
e
e
v
e
r
y
i
n
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
and desire to continue using the Commu
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
p
o
o
l
f
o
r
l
a
p
swimming this coming fall. My intenti
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
o
h
a
v
e
m
y
n
e
w
baby in Center Care while I swam. The
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
a
r
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
w
o
u
l
d
truly be my only option for such frequ
e
n
t
,
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
u
s
e
o
f
c
h
i
l
d
care. In fact, I can honestly say that
I
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
a
Community Center member if I could not
t
a
k
e
m
y
b
a
b
y
t
o
C
e
n
t
e
r
Care and do lap swimming during the mor
n
i
n
g
h
o
u
r
s
.
Currently, the fall, winter, and spring
p
o
o
l
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
in the Community Education Brochures in
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
m
o
r
n
i
n
g
h
o
u
r
s
between 9:30 and 11:30, Monday through
F
r
i
d
a
y
,
a
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
a
s
Parent/Child Swim. My experience as on
e
w
h
o
l
a
p
s
w
i
m
s
a
t
t
h
a
t
time is that the pool is under-used by
p
a
r
e
n
t
/
c
h
i
l
d
s
w
i
m
m
e
r
s
.
I
9(41,0
believe that the lifeguards on duty at this time would concur
with this assessment. On the other hand, I have had several
people express to me that they would like to lap swim during
these morning hours, only they believe that they cannot do so
because it is not so designated in the pool schedule.
I expressed my concerns along these lines to both Tom Weko and
Julia McFadden recently. I spoke with Julia on April 16, and she
indicated that while heavy usage of the pool during these hours
on Tuesdays and Thursdays is again planned for the upcoming fall
(swimming lessons and aqua-aerobics), it may be possible to amend
the schedule to include lap swim during these hours on Mondays,
Wednesdays, and Fridays. My thoughts are that such a schedule
change might promote higher usage of both the pool, and of Center
Care, as parents could use this child care service while they
swam laps.
On the occasions that I have used Center Care for my 7 year old,
I have always been pleased with the care given my son, the staff,
and the facilities. I indicated in the Center Care survey that I
would be willing to pay an annual registration fee, and increased
hourly rates. I am looking forward to being able to use Center
Care for our new baby. In closing, Mr. Lambert, I just wanted
you to know that Center Care does fill a need and that it is
certainly a very significant source of child care for me. I will
not be able to continue with my current use of the Community
Center, or with my membership, if Center Care is not available.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Seth Boedecker Dean
open.
Sincerely,
(sx.
Mary Cmpbell
Bob Lambert
- Director of Parks, Recreation,
and Natural Resources
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Mary Campbell
17879 Liv Lane
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
April 29, 1991
Dear Bob:
I urge you not to close Cen:er Care. Since its inception Center
Care has been, and continues to be, a wonderful program both for
children and for their parents.
Center Care allows people who would otherwise be unable to, to
use the Community Center. As new programs are developed, Center Care
will help to insure their success.
Should Center Ca:e close ncw, the Community Center will
undoubtedly have no nursery for many years. Future start up costs
will prevent reopening. The wrong decision now will mean lost
memberships and poor response to new programs in the future.
I believe other options, such as closing for the summer months
or a separate Center Care membership, should be explored before such
a wonderful facility is olosed. Although recent state regulations
have made it all but impossible for Center Care to be a money
producer, I feel it should be supported as a service to members of
the community who currently have children as well as those who will
have them in the future.
We would appreciate your efforts in keeping this fine facility
a
CA RS CENTER CARE HOURS Monday - Friday 9:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. and 5:00 - 7:30 p.m. RATES Member: $2.00 per hour $1.50 for each additional child Non-Member: $2.50 per hour $2.00 for each additional child AGE: 6 weeks - School Age CAPACITY: 14 Children MINIMUM STAY: 1 Hour MAXIMUM STAY: 3-1/2 hours EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER CHILD CARE PROGRAM 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Phone: 937-8727 #.1
The Eden Prairie Community Center is operating a licensed drop-in day care program. Any child in the community, 6 weeks through elementary school age, is welcome to attend. WE OFFER • a bright and cheerful room • more one on one attention • smaller group sizes CENTER CARE STAFF • a director experienced in early childhood education and certified • experienced mothers as teacher aides • an advisory board of parents PHILOSOPHY Center Care is committed to providing a nurturing climate in which to care for young children. We believe that each child is a unique person with his/her own needs. We follow the same principles that promote a healthy family: • WARMTH - TRUST - RESPECT - SUPPORT - ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM The daily program will include teacher directed activities and child initiated periods. Children may choose to play with any toy, paint at the easel, put on a puppet show or play dress-up in the housekeeping corner. We have equipment and materials for all ages. CHECK IN With each visit, children must be checked in at Center Care. We require that each parent fill out a short check-in form. If you have not already done so, you will be given an immunization record and a registration form to fill out. REMINDER: Time "in" starts at time of the reservation. Reser-vations are taken in the Eden Prairie Community Center central office 937-8727. Although 24 hour advance reservation is re-quested, drop-ins are permitted if room is available. CHECK OUT Your child will be released only to the person noted on the check-in form or persons you have authorized on the registration form. Center Care must be notified in the event that someone other than the person named on the Check-in Sheet will be picking up your child. LATE POLICY The late policy starts 5 minutes after we close. You will be charged $1.00 per child every 5 minutes. Feel free to stop in and become familiar with our Center Care Program. Center Care is a place to havefiut, to grow, to learn, and to share.
City of Eden Prairie
-4UNITY CENTER
,0 Valley View Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55346-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-8727
Dear Center Care Parents,
At the April 1st Parks Commission meeting, the Parks Commi
s
s
i
o
n
required Center Care staff to send out a survey in regar
d
s
t
o
Center Care usage. From January of 1991 through March 31,
1
9
9
1
only 68 families have used Center Care services at the Comm
u
n
i
t
y
Center. As one of these 68 families we feel it is very impo
r
t
a
n
t
that you respond to this survey as soon as possible. The s
u
r
v
e
y
must be turned in by Friday, April 26 to compile the info
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
, for the May 6 Parks Commission meeting. At that time the
s
t
a
t
u
s
of Center Care will be determined.
The following memorandum will give you further info
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
regarding the status of Center Care.
CENTER CARE SURVEY
Please mark all boxes that are applicable
1. What brings you to the Eden Prairie Community
C
e
n
t
e
r
?
Adult Classes
Child Classes
Center Care
Exercise
2. What other child care services do you use?
Neighborhood co-op?
Relative/Friend
Other Child Care Center
3. When your child is in Center Care do you...
Use Community Center
Run errands/home
Use other "club"
Other
4. If other child Care Center is used
Convenient
No reservation
Location
Other
reason why,
5. What do you lock for in a Center?
(check top three)
Location Cleanliness
Size Activities
Staff Group size
Cost Equipment
6. In order to help Center Care break even
(
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
requirement) and to remain open, the issue
o
f
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
fees must be addressed. OPTION ONE: A $.50 per hour increase and the program would operate nine
m
o
n
t
h
s
a
y
e
a
r
(Sept. 15 - June 15). OPTION TWO:
A dollar per hour increase and a year round program. Both thes
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
contingent on the premise that we have a min
i
m
u
m
o
f
f
o
r
t
y
families willing to pay the $25 annual regi
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
e
e
.
Would you be willing to pay, to Center Car
e
,
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
registration fee of $25 to reduce the deficit
o
f
t
h
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Care Program. This annual fee will all
o
w
y
o
u
a
$
.
5
0
reduction in your hourly Center Care rate. In
o
t
h
e
r
w
o
r
d
s
,
Care Club members (with annual fee of
$
2
5
)
w
o
u
l
d
p
a
y
S3.00/hr and non club member will pay S3.50/hr.
Yes
N o
TV.
7. If Center Care were going to go to a new rate format, a fee
of $3.00 for Center Care Club users (those people who paid
their annual registration fee) and $3.50 for non-club
member, would you still use the Center Care program at those
rates?
Yes
No
If no, reasons why
B. In your past Center Care experiences has the service
provided been...
Above average
Average
Below average
Indifferent
9. How often do your use Center Care? Please give a number
where appropriate.
A week
A month
A year
10. Please explain your reasons if any, you feel Center Care
should continue to operate at the Community Center.
Any other comments or suggestions you have about Center Care.
Thank you for your time and support.
qt)3
CENTER CARE SURVEY RESULTS
April 30, 1991
As of April 30, twenty-six out of sixty-five families have
responded to the Center Care Survey. The results are as follows:
When asked what brings you to the Eden Prairie Community Center,
four people said adult classes, twelve people said child classes,
seventeen people said Center Care, nine people said exercise and
one person said work.
When asked what other child care services they use five said
neighborhood co-op, seventeen said a relative or friend and nine
said they use other child care centers. Four people said they
use other child care centers for convenience. Two said because
of location, four said because of no reservation and seven said
because the availability of afternoon hours.
The top three qualities people said they look for in a center
were staff, location and cleanliness.
When asked if they would pay a twenty-five dollar annual
registration fee fourteen said they would and eleven said they
would not pay it. If we went to a new rate format of $3.00 an
hour for Center Care Club users and $3.50 for non-club members,
twenty people said they would still use Center Care and five said
they would not because it was too costly.
The twenty-six families who felt that their experiences at Center
Care have been average or above average.
When asked how often they use Center Care fourteen people said on
average twice a week, eight people said twice a month and three
people said between 2-6 times a year.
When asked why they feel Center Care should continue the number
one reason was convenience. Fifteen people said the location was
very convenient and the convenience of dropping their child off
and taking a class or watching a sibling take a class. Five
people felt as a community service.
Center Care Survey Results
April 26, 1991
Page 2
Additional comments and suggestions were:
... The on-site child care is a necessary service for those
families who might not be able to afford membership fees at
private recreational facilities. /
... Center Care is one of those services available in Eden
Prairie that makes it feel like an exceptional place to
live. /
... Center Care fills a gap in local child care. //
... It is necessary for my use of the Community Center. ///////
... I only wish there were afternoon hours available also.
... Have available more hours during the winter and less during
the summer. If
... Advertise the Center Care more. ///
... This is a wonderful service for "at-home" mothers, really
would be a loss to the users. /
... Center Care is extremely useful when I come to exercise, but
the problem of late has been that I couldn't bring my infant
there because the 2 infant maximum was already reached.
... If you opened in the afternoon during the summer, I think
you'd get a lot of use. /
... It is very convenient to me when I use the weight room or
walk the lake. I love it Please keep it going.
...
Its a wonderful care facility - clean, bright, great care.
I will not use any other facility for my infant and my 5 .
year old loves the small size.
... What about selling coupon books or a punch card top acquire
more revenue and establish user loyalty (commitment to use)
... Should coordinate Center Care hours with lap swim.
... Would like night hours, but to leave the building.
... Used Center Care once a week for 3-4 months when we were
building our new home.
... It was a terrific option to have a safe place that could
care for infants. Many places won't take children until
they reach 18 months.
Recreation Supervisor's Comments on Center Care Survey
According to Survey Results questions 6 and 7 Center Care could
save an additional $120.00/month by #1) charging a $25.00 Center
Care Membership Club fee to 15 families willing at this time to
pay such a fee and #2) increase hourly rates 4.50/hr. across the
board.
Current projections for the first 4 months is Center Care is
losing approximately $250.00/month. If the two changes were
implemented in the above paragraph Center Care would still lose
approximately $130.00/month or approximately $1560 per year. It
is also important to look at June - mid Sept. which is
traditionally the slowest usage time for Center Care, because of
staffing requirements larger losses may occur. Because of this
the Parks Commission may look at the option of closing Center
Care completely during the summer months.
Through April 28th Center Care has served 340 total users
representing 111 children and 82 families. Projected figures are
Center Care would serve approximately 1560 users representing
approximately 200 children and approximately 120 families.
Also important to note are the number of "regular" Community
Center users both members and non members who repeatedly use the
Center Care service.
Strictly Commentary
This program provides more than simply a baby sitting service. I
feel it is a program we provide for not only Community Center
users but the community at large. We are very fortunate to have
a qualified director such as Liz Thompson and the staff and
programs she provides are a positive contribution to the youth of •
our community.
crgo
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENT
E
R
-
C
H
I
L
D
C
A
R
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
YEAR TO DATE ACTIVITY BY FA
M
I
L
Y
JAN FEB MAR APR
I ABRAHAM
2 ABRAHAM
3 AMAT
4 ASBY
5 BERGER
6 BLOCK
7 BOLLIG
8 BOLLIG
BOLLIG 10 BOWLSBY
11 BOWLSBY
12 HORGAN
13 HORGAN
14 BOYCE
15 BRUBERG
16 BRUBERG
17 CAMPBELL
18 CAMPBELL
19 CHRENKA
20 CONRAD
21 CONRAD
22 CZEVNIECKI
23 DAHL
24 DEAM
25 DORAN
26 DUERKSEN
27 DUERKSEN
28 ECKLUND
29 EVENSON
30 FAGERHAUG
31 FALKINGHAM
32 FALKINGHAM
33 FLORENZANO
34 FLORENZANO
35 FOTH
36 FOTH
37 FREY
38 FREY
39 FREY
40 SERFS
41 GOON
42 HEDIN
43 HENEBRY
44 HILGEMAN
45 HUDSPETH
46 JOHNSON
47 JEFFERSON
48 KACZMAREK
49 KACZMAREK
50 KASEL
51 KAUFMAN
52 KAUFMAN
53 KOEHLER
54 KOO
55 KORWES
56 KREUTSBERG
57 LANEI
58 LARSON
59 LEHRKE
60 LEONE
61 LEONE
62 LEWIS
63 LEWIS
64 LUKER
65 MARSHALL
66 MARSHALL
67 MARTINEZ
68 MARTINEZ
69 MATHIEU
70 MEYER
71 MICHAILIS
ANDY 2 BETH ANN
2 MICHAEL
JILL 2 CAROL
DONNA 6 KELLY
KEVIN
PETER
JAYSON
JEFFREY
BRAD
HEATHER
SHANNON
1 ERIN
LISA
MARTIE
8 ROSE
ALEXANDER
ERIN
STEPHEN
7 NIKOLAS
CHRIS
JORDAN
VANESSA
ADAM
ANNE MARIE
ELENA
ABBY
DANIEL
AMY
ERIK
ERIC
KEVIN 4 JUSTIN
LINDSEY
EVAN
KRISTEN
MEGAN
RYAN
ALICIA
TRENT
SEAN
JULIA 2 ANDREW
JUSTIN
NICHOLAS
1 LAURA 1 MICHAEL
1 ERICA
RACHEL
SARAH
BRETT
HILARY 4 JEREMY
BRENNAN
TYLER
KRISTINA
NATHAN
ELISE
JENNIFER
KATE
SAM
JEFFREY
CASSANDRA
PHILLIP
1 DAVID
MARIELLE
CATHERINE
MELANIE
1 ANDREW 2
2 2
1 3
3*
4* 2 2
3 1*
2 1*
2 1*
2
1*
1*
1*
4
11
8
2*
1
2 7
5
2*
1*
1*
1*
1
1*
1* 3* 1 8 3
1*
2*
1*
3
2* 2 3
2 2 4
1
1*
2
1
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER - CHILD CARE CENTER
YEAR TO DATE ACTIVITY BY FAMILY
JAN
FEB MAR APR
72 MOSMAN LAUREN 1
73 MUENCH ETHAN
74 MURRAY ELISABETH 1
75 NELSON AUSTIN 1
76 NEUMAN ANDREW
77 NEUMAN JESSICA
78 OLZUSK BETH 1
79 OLZUSK KIM 1
80 ORRIS JACOB 4
81 ORRIS JUSTIN 4
82 PEZON ABBIE 1
83 POTTHFF WILL
84 PRIDEAUX DEVON
85 REIERSON BRAD 1
86 ROBERTS NATALIE
87 RYDEN ANNALYSE 1
88 SAYLOR ASHLEY
89 SHEEHAN ANDREW 6
90 SHEEHAN JAMES 8
91 SHIMOTA ZACH 1
92 SIERING DANNY
93 SIERING PATRICK
94 SPEAK MICHAELA
95 STENSON MARSHALL
96 TINUCCI MATT
97 TINUCCI PATRICK 4
98 TOMLINSON JEFFREY
99 TOWNSEND JACOB 2
100 TOWNSEND SARAH 2
101 WEBER ELLIE 2
102 WEBER ETHAN 5
103 WEBER LAURA 9
104 WEBSTER SCOTT
105 WHITCOMB ROBERT 1
106 WHITTIER STEPHEN 2
107 WIAT ALLISON
108 WIAT ASHLEY
109 WOCHNICK STEFANIE
110 YOUNGS MICHAEL
111 YOUNGS RACHAEL
2* 5
3
2
1
1* 2 1*
1*
3
1
3
8
6 1
4
6 5
3* 2
4
3* 2
3
2* 2
1
1*
5
2
1* 4
2
1 2
5
5 5
4
6 3
2*
2
1 1 1*
1*
1*
1*
1*
* NEW USER
TOTAL 106 116
118
123
UNIQUE
39 46
61
58
NEW
20
31
21
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER - CHILD CARE CENTER
YEAR TO DATE ACTIVITY
MORNING
EVENING
MEMBER NONMEMBER
TOTAL AM
MEMBER NONMEMBER
TOTAL PM
TOTAL DAY
MONTH $ I $ I
1
$ I $ I
$ I
$
n••n••n• WOO n ..
JAN $95.00 34
FEB 8164.50 48
OAR $97.00 35
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
$312.65 60
1302.20 60
$284.20 61
$407.65 94
8466.70 108
$381.20 96
$11.50 5
119.00 7
$19.50 8
$17.50 7 129.00 12
$2.50 1 $21.50 8
$36.90 14 156.40 22
$436.65 106
8408.20 116
8437.60 118
DEC
1356.54 117 1899.05 181 81.255.55 298 850.00 20 854.90 22 1106.40 42 81.162.45 340
TOTAL MORNING
$1,755.55 298
TOTAL MEMBERS $406.50 137
TOTAL EVENING
$106.90 42
TOTAL NONMEMBERS $955.95 203
TOTAL Y-T-D $1,362.45 340
TOTAL Y-T-D 81.342.45 340
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. April 1, 1991
-3-
Lambert added that there will be a special City Council
Meeting on Tuesday, April 9 to discuss capital improvement
needs for the City.
MOTION: Kuechenmeister moved to recommend approval
of Fairfield per staff recommendation. Lynch seconded
the motion and it passed 5-0.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Review of Center Care Programs
Refer to memo dated March 27, 1991 from Lyndell Frey,
Recreation Supervisor.
Lambert said that center care at the Community Center
was started in 1989 when there were numerous requests
for this type of service. The program was approved
provided that it was run on a breakeven basis. Operating
costs could not be met by providing care for members
only so non-members were also accepted for the program.
This reduced the loss in revenue; however, the State
then required that the program be licensed and staff
requirements of no volunteer help.
Frey added that the State required a maximum stay of
three hours and that parents had to remain on-site,
in addition to the fact that volunteers could no longer
be used. The program has been losing money on a
consistent basis since that time.
Kuechenmeister asked if the State would grant a variance
to the two person staffing minimum. Frey said no.
Richard asked if the fee for the service could be raised.
Frey said that other services in the area range from
82.50 to $3.25 per hour. He added that one in three
using the service are members of the Community Center.
Lambert said that at the time the program was started,
the closest drop-off service was at Southdale. Now
there are services of this type in Eden Prairie and
he questions whether the taxpayers should be required
to subsidize a babysitting service for other people.
The program was started because of the requests from
members and the facility was not designed for this
purpose.
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. April 1, 1991
-4-
Lynch suggested that an application charge be considered
to raise funds. This would be charged to each user
Ft the beginning of the year to reserve their space.
Karpinko suggested that those using the service on
a regular basis could be charged an application fee
and drop-offs could be charged a higher hourly rate.
Lambert suggested an annual registration charge for
non-members and a flat fee for all users.
Bowman added that with the number of users we are looking
at, an application fee would not cover the costs to
run the program.
Vanderploeg asked if the State would be satisfied with
an in-house program only. Frey said yes, but losses
would be greater.
Vanderploeg suggested that a survey of users be done
asking if they would still use the Community Center
facilities if the program was discontinued or would
they be able to find childcare nearby.
Karpinko said he feels we need to go back and find
out exactly how many different users they are and base
a decision on that.
Vanderploeg asked if this room is used only for childcare.
Frey said that this is also a meeting room and is used
from 7:30 to 10:30 p.m.
Lambert suggested that the number of users be tabulated
and a survey be sent out to the users with the results
to be discussed at the May Commission meeting.
Lynch asked if the City will be ready to respond that
the program may be discontinued. Lambert said he feels
this should be put on the survey as a possibility.
Bowman asked if the room has ever been filled to capacity
for the program. Frey said it has not been filled
often.
q7 I
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. April 1, 1991
-5-
Bowman suggested a monthly pass with reduced rates
to promote the program. This would provide more money
up front and promote usage of the program. Frey said
they have had a pass program in the past, but users
seemed to use the program in cycles and there were
problems with getting the cards punched, etc.
MOTION: Karpinko moved to survey the users and report
back to the Commission at the May meeting.
Lynch amended the motion to add that data on users
be analyzed prior to the survey being submitted to
the Commission. Bowman seconded the motion and it
passed 5-0.
B. Ordinance #11-91 Dumping Household Refuse in Public
Trash Receptacles
Refer to memo dated March 22, 1991 from Bob Lambert,
Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission.
This is an information item only.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Outdoor Center Rental Rates
Refer to memo dated March 18, 1991 from Rod MacRae,
Outdoor Center Coordinator.
Lambert said that the professional category was dropped
because the events are hosted by a parks and recreation
person and are covered by the community or staff category.
A commercial use category was added to be consistent
with other facilities. The center cannot be used by
private individuals to make money.
Frey added that no one can reserve the center until
the season when it will be used.
Lambert said that a $25 minimum charge has also been
added to meet our minimum cost to open and close the
building.
MOTION: Vanderploeg moved to recommend adopting the
Outdoor Center rates per staff recommendation. Lynch
seconded the motion and it passed 5-0.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. May 6, 1991
-11-
V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
None
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. Center Care Program
Refer to memo dated March 27, 1991 from Lyndell Frey,
Recreation Supervisor.
Frey said that the center care user survey information
was included in the packets. As of April 30, 26 out
of 65 families responded to the survey. Frey added
that 28 new families used the program in April. Currently
center care is losing approximately $250.00 per month.
By increasing the hourly rates and charging an annual
fee, the center will still lose about $130.00 per month.
Caroline Headseth said that she would not be taking
classes at the Community Center without center care
for her two children. She asked if the program is
being run as a service or as a business to make money.
Lambert said that center care was started as a service
to be run on a break-even basis. New rules instituted
by the State have made this more difficult.
Mary Campbell commented that center care will probably
never break even and will always be inconsistent.
Frey said that the main problem has been the new rules
which require two people to be present at all times.
Kuechenmeister asked if the State will give on the
rules in this case. Frey said no.
Richard asked if staff on duty could also be doing
other things related to parks and recreation. Frey
said they are already trying to do this.
Richard said that staff's main concern is subsidizing
center care when there are other needs within the City.
Joyer asked if most users are involved in activities
at the Community Center. Frey said it is about 50-
50.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. May 6, 1991
-12-
Headseth said she does not believe the public is aware
of center care and feels that it should be advertised
more.
MOTION: Lynch moved to recommend that effective June
1, a $25.00 application fee will be instituted for
members of the Commmunity Center with a rate of $3.00
per hour. For those not wishing to pay the application
fee, the hourly rate will be $3.50 per hour with a
50C reduction for a second child. Staff will continue
to monitor the program and report back to the Commission
on October 1. Kuechenmeister seconded the motion and
it passed 4-0.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Proposal for Repair of Barn on the Riley-Jacques
Homestead
Refer to memo dated April 29, 1991 from Bob Lambert,
Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources.
Lambert said that Mrs. Jacques has offered to donate
$5000 to the City toward repair of the barn if the
work is done in 1991. Total cost of repairs would
be $24,874. Staff suggests using cash park fees for
this repair.
Lambert added that it is not known whether other bids
will be available for the barn restoration.
Richard said he spoke to Mrs. Jacques today and she
was concerned that the barn remain part of this historic
site. Ha added that more money may be required in
the future to make the structure useable for programs.
Lambert said that City staff would paint the barn at
a cost of approximately $2000 after the restoration
work is completed.
Lynch asked if there is any protection against vandalism
in these types of City buildings. Lambert said that
there is an alarm system at CumminsGrill house and
this barn would most likely have a simple alarm system
if it was used for storage.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-122
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
COFFMAN WOODS
WHEREAS, the plat of Coffman Woods has been submitted in a manner required for platting
land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Coffman Woods is approved upon compliance with the
recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 16, 1991.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 21, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: May 16, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Coffman Woods Final Nat
PROPOSAL: Coffman Development Company has requested City Council approval of the
final plat of Coffman Woods. The plat is located south of West 62nd Street and east of
Duck Lake Road in the North Half of Section 5. This proposal is a replat of Lot 4,
Block 4, County Glen and includes a portion of the Lueck property to the south which
was previously the subject of an administrative division in 1990.
This proposal is consistent with previously approved preliminary plats of Country Glen
and Country Glen 2nd Addition.
Lot 1 contains 0.31 acres and Outlot A contains 0.75 acres. Outlot A will be
incorporated into Country Glen 2nd Addition for further development at a later date.
All municipal utilities, streets and walkways necessary to serve Lot 1 are in place and
available for use.
Outlot A does not meet minimum standards for a residential lot and the owner is hereby
put on notice that no building permit will be granted for Oudot A and the sole purpose
for platting Outlot A is for the incorporation into Country Glen 2nd Addition.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of final plat of Coffman Woods subject to the
requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of Engineering Fee in the amount of $250.00.
2. Completion of underlying drainage and utility easements within Lot 4, Block 4,
Country Glen.
JJ:ssa
cc: Bill Coffman
Ron Bastyr
q76
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-123
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
MINNESOTA VIKINGS
WHEREAS, the plat of Minnesota Vikings has been submitted in a
manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance
Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of
Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Minnesota Vikings is approved
upon compliance with the recommendation of the City
Engineer's report on this plat dated May 16, 1991.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd.
2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between
the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of
the final plat as described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and
subdivision of the above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 21, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technici
May 16, 1991
Minnesota Vikings
PROPOSAL: Minnesota Vikings, Inc. have requested City Council approval of the final plat of
Minnesota Vikings. Located at the northwest corner of Viking Drive and Washington
Avenue, the plat contains 15.04 acres. This proposal consists of combining Lots 1 and 2 of
CNR Golden Strip East into one lot to accommodate the construction of the proposed indoor
practice facility.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council April 3, 1990 per Resolution
No. 90-84.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 15-90-PUD-8-90, Zoning District Amendment within the
12 District, was finally read and approved at the City Council meeting held December 18,
1990.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed December 18, 1990.
VARIANCES: A variance is necessary from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-month
maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the
final plat. All variance requests not originally granted through the Planned Unit
Development District Review must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, streets and walkways are currently in place
and available to serve this project.
There are underlying drainage and utility easements on the perimeter of the existing Lot 1,
Block 1 of Golden Strip East that must be vacated prior to the recording of this plat.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Minnesota Vikings subject to
the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following:
I. Receipt of Engineering Fee in the amount of $250.00.
2. Completion of vacation of underlying drainage and utility easements within Lot 1,
Block 1.
JJ:ssa
cc: Jeff Diamond, Minnesota Vikings
Thomas Bergquist, Sathre Bergquist, Inc.
qn
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-124
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through R.C.M., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for
the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-203 - Staring Lane/Ridge Road Utility and Street Improvements
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in
the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., June 14, 1991, at City Hall after which
time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will
then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday,
June 18, 1991, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5%
(percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 21, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-125
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through R.C.M., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for
the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-205 - Sunrise Circle Utility and Street Improvements
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in
the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., June 14, 1991, at City Hall after which
time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will
then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday,
June 18, 1991, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5%
(percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 21, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
993
Special Assessment Agreement No. 91-02
AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT MADE THIS 10TH DAY of MAY, 1991,
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation; (th
e
"
C
i
t
y
"
)
a
n
d
Edwin and Dorothy Sisam, individuals (the "Owners").
A. The Owners hold legal and equitable title to propert
y
surveyed and platted as Lot 5, Block 3, Creek Knoll
s
,
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
County, Minnesota, which property is the subject of th
i
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
and is hereinafter referred to as the "Property".
B. The Owners desire to connect to municipal sanitary se
w
e
r
prior to the petitioned improvement project (utili
t
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
improvements on Wild Duck Pass) being construc
t
e
d
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
rebuilding their private system (all of which is herea
f
t
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
to as the "Improvements").
C. The parties hereto desire to enter into an Agreeme
n
t
concerning the financing of the construction of the
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
all of which will inure to the benefit of the Propert
y
.
AGREEMENT
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
1. The owners consent to paying the entire cost of
t
h
e
improvements associated with the connection to munici
p
a
l
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
sewer.
2. The City is preparing a Feasibility Report for util
i
t
y
and street improvements on White Tail Crossing, Trot
t
e
r
s
P
a
t
h
a
n
d
Wild Duck Pass which will indicate the proposed co
s
t
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
with constructing utility and street improvements
o
n
W
i
l
d
D
u
c
k
Pass. The owners consent to the levying of sanitary s
e
w
e
r
qq I
assessments against their property for the construction of sanitary
sewer improvements on Wild Duck Pass. The owners will be given a
credit against their sanitary sewer assessment for the amount which
they pay for the installation of a saddle on the 8" main and for
25' of the 4" sewer pipe.
3. The City's assessment records for the property will show
a "pending assessment" in the amount of $4,440.00 for the sanitary
sewer connection fee until the "pending assessment" for the utility
and street improvements on Wild Duck Pass is placed on the
assessment records at which time the $4,440.00 pending assessment
will be removed. In the event the project and subsequent pending
assessments are not ordered by July 1, 1992, the $4,440.00
connection fee will be assessed in the fall of 1992, less the
credit to the owners as provided in Paragraph 2 above.
PROPERTY OWNERS
Lot 5, Block 3, Creek Knolls
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
A Minnesota Municipal
Corporation
By: Douglas B. Tenpas
Its Mayor
By: Dorothy Sisam
By: Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
qtg
The f regoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of AY , 1991, by Edwin Sisam, and Dorothy Sisam, the
property owners of Lot 5, Block 3, Creek Knolls.
JEFFREY J. JOHNSON
NOTARY RAMC- MINNESOTA 0
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My commissaA espires 03 13 97
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) s.s.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1991, by Douglas B. Tenpas, the Mayor and Carl
J. Jullie, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) s.s.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
993
RESOLUTION NO.
Approving execution and delivery of a First
Supplemental Trust Indenture relating to
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Sterling
Ponds Project) Series 1989A and Series 1989B
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, a political subdivision of
the State of Minnesota (the "Issuer") has issued its Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds (Sterling Ponds Project) Series 1989A in the
original principal amount of $5,490,000 and its Multifamily Housing
Revenue Bonds (Sterling Ponds Project) Series 1989B in the original
principal amount of $495,000 (collectively, the "Bonds") and loaned
the proceeds thereof to Prairie Village Limited Partnership, a
Minnesota limited partnership (the "Partnership"); and
WHEREAS, the Partnership has presented to the Issuer for its
approval a certain First Supplemental Trust Indenture proposed to
be dated as of May 1, 1989 (the "Supplemental Indenture").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Issuer that the
Supplemental Indenture is hereby approved and the Mayor and City
Manager, or persons acting by law in their stead, are hereby
authorized and directed to execute the Supplemental Indenture, with
such changes thereto as such authorized persons shall approve,
shall approval being deemed conclusively given upon the execution
of such Supplemental Indenture by such persons; provided, however,
that all Holders of Bonds shall in writing consent to the terms of
the Supplemental Indenture as executed.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this
day of May 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
gg Lj
Corporate Risk Managers, Inc.
7525 office ridge circle • eden prairie, minnesota 55344 • (612) 944-0474
May 16, 1991
Mr. John Frane
Finance Director
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: June 1, 1991-1992
Property/Casualty Insurance Renewal
Dear John:
Enclosed find a summary of the City's current coverages and renewal quotations
as submitted by the J. A. Price Agency and Horizon Agency. Also included is a
tabulation of the recommended quotations from each of the respective agencies.
With respect to the quotations themselves. I recommend acceptance of the League
of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, LMCIT Workers' Compensation Program, St. Paul
Companies' Liquor Liability Program, and the United Fire & Casualty Bond through
the J. A. Price Agency. Further, I recommend acceptance of the Travelers' Boiler
and Machinery Program through the Horizon Agency. You will also note that the
Horizon Agency submitted both a property and inland marine quotation. These
quotations are not recommended because the LMCIT does not allow the splitting :
of coverages amongthevarious insurance carriers. The LMCIT program is a total
package program.
The overall result of this year's bid process is a reduction in cost of $14,578
from last year, while at the same time increasing limits and forms of coverage.
If you have any questions or would like me present at the Council meeting while
considering these quotations, please let me know.
Sincerely,
CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS, INC.
6 64i
Brian G. Colway
Assistant Vice President
BGC/jb
Enclosures
American
Agency
Coverage Lieits New
Lieits
Horizon
Agency
LPL - 191i
J.A. Price
LICIT
1991 - 1992
LMCIT
Current Cost
1!90 - 1991
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
JUN1.1,.1411:IZ _ PROPERTY/CASUALTY RENEWAL
112atal
Litit: $23,097,874
Blanket Bldg/Cont/PPO
All Rist/Replacemint Cost
Deductible: 00,000 All Lines
Aggregate
$ 32,547
$25,062,878
$ 31,599 $ 23,600
New Hampshire
Red. $5,000
Yilmo
Lieit: $5,000 City Hall
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
glare allast
Lieit: $5,000 City Hall
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
1,000
74 Not Covered Not Covered
lb o Quote
Not Covered
NM ?lariat
Licit: $883,538 Mobile Equipment
18,730 Bolts
2,969
924,733
20,105
2,263 2,362
Bed. $1,000
Glass
6
Not Covered Not Covered
Not Covered
Scheduled
At Rill Liquor Store
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
LIMBO *MEW?!
Lieit: $2,000 In/Out
Liquor Store Locations
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
General 11apility
Lisa: $600,000 BI, PO, PI
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
Claim Made
Retro Date: 6/1/87
Li cited Pollution
Retro Date: 6/1/88
Poblic OfficAls Liability
Lieit: $600,000
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
Retro Date: 6/1/87
Claies Made
Eeployee Benefit Liability
31 Not Covered Not Covered
Not Covered
103,432
No Change
No Quote
12,618
8,321
No Quote
No Change
Inverse Condonation 2,586 2,923 No Quote
Retro Date: 6/1/88
-39
Page 2
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
JUNE 1, 1991-92 PROPERTY/CASUALTY RENEWAL
- LOCI
J.A. Price Aserican Horizon
Coverage Liaits Current Cost Nee LICIT
Agency Agency 1990 - 1991
1990 - 1991
Liaits 1990 - 199; 1991 - 199; 1991 - 19!;
Comehensive Auto
Lisit: $600,000 01, PD
$ 50,000 UMMIN
Deductible: All Lines Aggregate
174 Autos
ilEtil iiiii
Lisit: $1,000,000 Occurrence
$1,000,000 Aggregate
Deductible: 110,000 Retention
Non-Waiver of !amenity
Retro Bate: 6/1/07
$ 24,457
.n100111
No Change
175 Autos
No Change
$ 21,-797
n01 n0014+
No Quote
=7=2
211.1.11.112
SUB-TOTAL
$247,720
$228,015
$ 25,962
Workers Coloensation
$203,625
$221,837
No Quote Statutory
Statutory
INC",EBA
DO I Volunteer Coverage Not Covered
2,175
No Quote
Boiler & Machinery
$500,000 Direct Deluge
Deductible: $1,000
Comprehensive
Hartford Insurance
Incl. Production Machinery
8,861 8,841
No Change Hartford
Included
6,279
Travelers
Included
Locations 9595 Anderson Lakes Pkwy. 9,375 11,029
No Quote Liait: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence/ No Change Transcontinental
Aggregate PD, Loss of Means
of Support
Deductible: None
Receipts: $1,019,000 $1,092,000
Transcontinental Ins. Co.
Location: 16500 M. 78th Street
Lisit: $1,000,000 Per Occurrence/
Aggregate B1, PD, Loss of Means
of Support
Deductible: None
Receipts: $1,506,000
13,855
$1,505,000
16,009
Transcontinental
No Quote
qq9
Coverage Limits
tublic EmplovIgiond
$20,000 All Esployees
$50,000 Treasurer
United Fire & Casualty
LICIT
Current Cost
1990 - 1991
LA. Price
Loch
1991 - 1992
American
Agency
1991 - 1992
Horizon
Agency
1991 - 1992
Na Quote
New
Li wits
1,409 $ 2,155
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
JUNE I 1991-9 ? PRROMPAMIYANE 1184
Page:
2.12.322
TOTAL $485,345
Alternatygi
ijbihi Mon -
Waiver of !sanity/
$2,000,000 hut
22.23E.
$490,081
assappezs
32,241
$ 73,000 No Quote
12110E . MichipeCY
Liquor liability
Anderson Lakes
7,310
American States
Incl. Production
Machinery
6,814
Excl. Production
Machinery
4,204
St. Paul
6,745
Travelers
Limit -
$2,500,000
Sublimit -
$25,000
Incl. Prod.
Nachinery
78th Street
6,102
St. Paul
qL11
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
JUNE 1, 1991-1992 PROPERTY/CASUALTY RENEWAL
Recommended Quotation
Premium
LMCIT
Property
Valuable Papers
Extra Expense
Inland Marine
Glass
Money & Securities
General Liability
Public Officials Liability
Inverse Condemnation
Comprehensive Auto
Excess Liability
$ 31,599
Included
Not Covered
2,263
Not Covered
Not Covered
111,112
8,321
2,923
21,797
50,000
$228,015
J. A. Price Agency
LMCIT/EBA J. A. Price Agency
Workers Compensation $221,837
Optional Volunteer Coverage 2,175
Travelers Horizon Agency
Boiler & Machinery 6,279
St. Paul Companies J. A. Price Agency
Liquor Liability 4,204
Location: 9595 Anderson Lakes
Parkway
Location: 16500 W. 78th Street
United Fire & Casualty Co.
Public Employee Blanket Bond
6,102
2 .155
J. A. Price Agency
TOTAL $470,767
9q9
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THRU: CARL JULLIE, CITY MANAGER
FROM: JOHN FRANE, FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE: MAY 16,1881
RE: LEASE FOR THE PRESERVE CENTER LIQUOR STORE
THIS LEASE EXPIRES ON JUNE 1. WE HAVE BEEN OFFERED A NEW
LEASE FOR THREE YEARS WITH AN OPTIONAL TWO YEAR EXTENSION.
THE FIRST TWO YEARS WOULD BE AT OUT PRESENT RATE WITH $0.18
PER YEAR INCREASES IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS. WE REQUEST AUTHOR-
IZATION TO SIGN IT. THE PRAIRIE VILLAGE MALL LEASE RUNS
UNTIL SEPTEMBER OF 1982.
THE NET PRCTIT FROM LIQUOR OPERATIONS IN 1990 WAS $162,000
WHICH IS AN INCREASE OF 21% OVER 1989.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #91-8I
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF HI WAY 494 RACQUET CLUB
FOR NORTHWEST RACQUET SWIM AND HEALTH CLUB
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Hiway 494 Racquet Club for Northwest Racquet Swim and Health
Club, dated May 15, 1991, consisting of 19.53 acres into one lot and three outlots for
construction of a parking lot and tennis court structures on the south side of the property, a copy
of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the
Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of May, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
/991
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
April 5, 1991
Hiway 494/Crosstown Racquet, Swim and Health Club
East of Baker Road, north of Holasek Lane
Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Clubs, Inc.
1. Zoning District Change from Rural to Community Commercial on
2.7 acres.
2. Site Plan Review on 19.53 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 19.53 acres into one lot and three outlots for
construction of a parking lot and tennis court structures.
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Background
This item was previously reviewed in 1989
by the Planning Commission and City
Council. At that time, a 29,000 square foot
building expansion and a three level parking
ramp was approved on the north side of the
existing tennis club to satisfy the parking
requirements. As part of the original
approval, a temporary parking lot was
constructed on the south side of the building
for overflow parking until the ramp was
built. In addition, the proponent agreed to
build four tennis courts and dedicate 2.21
acres to the City for park land.
Recently, the tennis club purchased the
remainder of the Holasek property (4.2
acres) and is proposing to construct surface
1
Staff Report
Hiway 494/Crosstown Racquet, Swim and Health Club
April 5, 1991
parking on this property instead of building the parking rarnp.
The current request is for a preliminary plat, site plan review and zoning district change to allow
for the construction of a 297 car parking lot. The tennis court construction and park land
dedication previously agreed to in the July 17, 1990 Developer's Agreement will still occur.
Site Plan/Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat depicts one lot and three outlots. The proposed lot will be the location of
the tennis club and parking areas, while the outlots will be for Holasek Hill Park, the water
tower and the storm sewer pond located next to Baker Road. The original site plan consisted of
9.73 acres. In 1988, the proponent purchased 2.21 acres from Holasek and the remaining 4.2
acres in 1990. Combined with the original lot, the tennis club will own a total of 16.14 acres.
Of this total, 3.99 acres will be dedicated to the City.
The current proposal is to eliminate the parking ramp on the north side of the building and to
provide surface parking on the property previously owned by Holasek. Besides the 360 parking
stalls that currently exist, an additional 297 parking stalls will be constructed on the south side
for a total of 657. A building expansion is not proposed at this time.
The proponent will construct four tennis courts on the property next to Holasek Lane and will
dedicate 3.99 acres to the City. When combined with the water tower property the City would
own a total of 5.69 acres. In return for the land dedication and tennis court construction, the
City will convey to the tennis club the 30 foot strip of land that provides access to the water
tower so both parcels can be combined. A cross-access easement will be required over the
parking lot to provide access for City vehicles to the water tower. In addition, a cross-parking
easement is required over the parking spaces next to the tennis courts for public use.
Acces$
Access to the site is provided by a driveway off Baker Road that provides service to the
temporary parking areas and to the water tower and a new driveway proposed on Pinnacle Drive.
Hennepin County is requiring that the existing driveway off Baker Road be closed with the
development of this proposal (see attached letter). Because of this, all traffic must take access
from Pinnacle Drive. Prior to Council review, all plans must be revised to reflect the closing
of the driveway off Baker Road.
2
Staff Report
Hiway 494/Crosstown Racquet, Swim and Health Club
April 5, 1991
farking
In summary, the 1988 traffic study stated that:
1. Future peak parking demand totals approximately 555 spaces. This includes the
parking requirements for the 29,000 square foot building expansion.
2. The maximum practical capacity of the club results in a parking demand of 780
spaces.
3. On site parking supply needs to be increased to accommodate 585 vehicles in
conjunction with the proposed club expansion and should have provision for future
increase to approximately 820 spaces.
To accomplish this, the study recommended that the developer construct a three-level parking
ramp on the west portion of the north parking lot to accommodate approximately 620 total on
site parking spaces.
The current plans indicate the construction of 297 surface parking stalls on the south side of the
building for a total of 657. This satisfies the original requirement of the traffic study for a total
of 620 parking spaces. This figure included an additional 75 parking spaces that were required
for the 29,000 square foot building addition. If the building addition is never constructed, the
total number of parking spaces may be reduced accordingly. If additional parking spaces are
required, a one level parking structure could be constructed on either the north or south side of
the building. Staff recommends that it be constructed on the north side of the building to lessen
the impact on the residential areas to the south and west.
Grading/Utilities
Areas to be graded with this project include the location of temporary parking lot, the level area
before the trees on the Holasek property, and the holding pond next to Baker Road. No
significant trees will be lost. The majority of the grading involves berming of the parking area
along the west property line. This would include fill amounts of up to 16 feet. Other grading
work involves the construction of the holding pond which includes a cut of approximately 12
feet. A 5 foot high keystone retaining wall is proposed next to Holasek Lane. Retaining wall
details must be submitted prior to Council review.
A storm sewer system will be the only utilities constructed as part of the project (see Engineering
memo).
Staff Report
Hiway 494/Crosstown Racquet, Swim and Health Club
April 5, 1991
Landscaping
The landscape requirement for this project is based on the screening of the parking areas only.
The landscape plan depicts approximately 196 caliper inches of plant material around the
perimeter of the project. An irrigation system is planned. The proponent shall revise the
landscape plan to indicate correct numbers and sizes of the plant material proposed on the plans.
Pedestrian Systems
A five foot concrete sidewalk will be installed along Pinnacle Drive to provide access from Baker
Road to the tennis courts.
Signate
Informational signage for parking identification is the only sign proposed for this project. A
detailed signage plan consistent with City Code must be submitted prior to Council review. The
City will install a Holasek Hill Park sign on the property next to the tennis courts.
Lighting
The lighting plan indicates eight, 25 foot light poles within the parking lot and two, 25 foot light
poles at the entrance drives. The proponent is also proposing 12 bollards at the entrances. With
the implementation of this plan, the existing flood lights on the south side of the building shall
be removed.
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommends approval of the requests of the Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Club, Inc.
for Zoning District Change from Rural to Community Commercial on 2.7 acres, Site Plan
Review on 19.53 acres and Preliminary Plat of 19.53 acres into one lot and three outlots for
construction of a 297 car parking lot and tennis court structures based on plans dated March 15,
and March 20, 1991, and Staff Report dated April 5, 1991, subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the correct sizes and numbers of landscaping
material proposed on the plans.
4
looS-
Staff Report
Blway 494/Crosstown Racquet, Swim and Health Club
April 5, 1991
Revise all plans to reflect the elimination of the access drive to Baker Road based
on Hennepin County requirements.
C. Submit retaining wall details.
2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion
control plans for review by the Watershed District and Engineering Department.
3. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading.
B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing.
C. Stake the grading limits of the snow fence. Any tree loss outside the proposed
grading limits shall be replaced on an area inch per area inch basis.
4. The proponent shall give guarantee of land dedication of the property which is proposed
to be dedicated. The proponent shall also provide the City with security for the
construction of the four tennis courts.
5. Guarantee construction of parking requirements as indicated in the 1988 traffic study.
6. Provide the necessary easements for parking and access to the water tower.
7. Remove the existing flood lights from the south side of the building.
NWRCTSR.DRU:bs
5
7_
HENNEMN
_FL
March 8, 1991
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468
PHONE: (612) 930-2500
FAX (612) 930-2513
TDD. (612) 930-2696
Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE: Proposed Plat - Crosstown Racquet Club
CSAH 60/62, southeast quadrant
Section 3, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 1913
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of
proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and have the
following comments:
- The existing right of way along CSAH 62 and CSAH 60 is adequate. Hennepin
County does not require any additional right of way at this time.
- As shown on the preliminary plat, Hennepin County will not permit any access
from the plat to CSAH 62.
- Access from the plat to CSAH 60 must be limited to the existing driveway located
approximately 465 feet south of CSAH 62 and to existing Pinnacle Drive. The
driveway located approximately 100 feet north of Pinnacle Drive must be removed
and the area within County right of way restored. Relocating this southerly
access to Pinnacle Drive helps prevent traffic conflict and congestion along
CSAH 60. A well designed driveway off Pinnacle Drive will provide more than
adequate access for the southern portion of the plat and for the City's water
tower on Outlot A.
The developer must acquire an approved entrance permit before beginning any
access construction, revision, or restoration. Contact Dave Zetterstrom at
930-2548 for information and for permit forms .
The landscape, plan dated February 8, 1991. shows placement of a tree and shrubs
within County right of way north of Pinnacle Drive. Hennepin County will not
permit this, and the developer must change the plans accordingly.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
CC
C C
Chris Enger
March 8, 1991
Page 2
- Since this plat also abuts 1-494,
i
t
m
u
s
t
b
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
,Department of Transportation. Submi
t
a
c
o
p
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
t
o
:
Tim Henkel
Transportation Planner
Minnesota Department of Transportati
o
n
Golden Valley Office
2055 North Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, MN 55422
- All proposed construction within C
o
u
n
t
y
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
e
i
t
h
e
r
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
utility permit or entrance permit p
r
i
o
r
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
permit includes, but is not limited
t
o
,
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
t
r
a
i
l
development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Off
i
c
e
,
9
3
0
-
2
5
4
9
,
f
o
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
permit forms.
- The developer must restore all are
a
s
,
w
i
t
h
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
,
d
i
s
t
u
r
b
e
d
during plat construction.
Please direct any response or questi
o
n
s
t
o
D
o
u
g
M
a
t
t
s
o
n
a
t
9
3
0
-
2
6
7
5
.
Sincerely,
Dennis L. Hansen, P.E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
18.H/DBM:gk
cc: Tim Henkel, MN/DOT
Ioo7
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Planning Commissioner
THROUGH: Alan Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Mary Krause, Project Engineer
DATE: April 4, 1991
SUBJECT: Crosstown Racquet, Swim & Health Club
Engineering Comments Concerning Site Drainage
The Engineering Department has reviewed the drainage plans for the Crosstown
Racquet, Swim & Health Club. The plans were prepared by Hanson, Thorp,
Pellinen, Olson, Inc. Drainage calculations, storm sewer design and detention
pond design have been submitted and reviewed by the Engineering Department
and appear to be adequate.
MK/ssa
Dsk:MK.XTOWN-RA.CQT
/009
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #91-102
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF ANAGRAM INTERNATIONAL
FOR RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Anagram International for Ryan Construction Company , dated May
16, 1991 consisting of 15.67 acres into four lots for construction of a 199,210 square foot
office/warehouse building in three phases, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found
to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and
amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of May, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
30
Anagram International
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION # 91-100
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANAGRAM INTERNATIONAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK NINTH ADDITION
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Anagram International development is considered a proper amendment
to the overall Edenvale Industrial Park Ninth Addition Planned Unit Development Concept;
a
n
d
,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request
of Ryan Construction Company for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Edenva
l
e
Industrial Park Ninth Addition Planned Unit Development Concept for the Anagram Internation
a
l
development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Counc
i
l
;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on May 21, 1991;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Anagram International development PUD Concept Amendment, being in
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the
overall Edenvale Industrial Park Ninth Addition Planned Unit Development
Concept as outlined in the application materials for Anagram International.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated May 13, 1991.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 21st day of May, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
1011
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 10, 1991
Anagram International
Southeast comer of Valley View Road and Executive Drive
Anagram International
Equitable Life Insurance Company
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 15.67 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 15.67
acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment within the 1-2 Zoning District on
15.67 acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 15.67 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 15.67 acres to four lots.
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this
site as an industrial land use. Surrounding
land uses are Medium Density Residential to
the north across Valley View Road; Office
to the east and south of the site; and
Industrial to the west. This site is part of a
previously approved Planned Unit
Development Concept plan for a mixture of
office and industrial uses on approximately
100 acres of land. The PUD depicted this
site as an industrial land use.
In 1987, the City approved the Edenvale
Executive Center Phase Il for three one-
story buildings totalling 172,907 square feet
Anagram
Staff Report
Page Two
of building. The uses proposed were approximately 60% office and 40% industrial.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
Anagram International is requesting approval of two alternative amendments to the existi
n
g
P
U
D
.
Anagram is requesting approval of the Anagram building of approximately 115,000 sq
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
with expansion to 199,000 square feet. This plan also includes an additional lot (o
w
n
e
d
b
y
Equitable Life Insurance Company) which would be a future industrial use. The alter
n
a
t
i
v
e
i
s
Phase I Anagram (no expansion) and three lots meeting City code requirements.
SITE PLAN
The site plan depicts the construction of three phases. Phase I is a one-story building c
o
n
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
of 115,560 square feet on 8.13 acres at a .33 base area ratio. If Anagram proceeds to
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
and III, the base area ratio would increase to .34. The Industrial zoning district perm
i
t
s
u
p
t
o
a .30 base area ratio. Reasons for considering the waiver to allow a higher base area r
a
t
i
o
a
r
e
:
1. The building is set back at 80 feet. This is 30 feet farther back than the Code wou
l
d
permit as a minimum setback.
2. Provision of a large landscaped entry feature (private/public park) which is not require
d
by City code.
3. Extensive use of berming and landscaping which downplays the building height an
d
building mass. The landscape plan is similar to the Flagship Athletic Club.
4. A 95' setback to parking from Valley View Road (Code requires a minimum of 50 feet) helps provide a better visual transition to the residential areas across Valley View Road.
5. Parking is provided according to City Code.
6. Parking and loading areas are screened according to Code.
PARKING
Parking requirements for the Anagram proposal for all phases would be a total of 391
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
spaces. The site plan depicts a total of 391 spaces. The minimum setback requir
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
parking along Executive Drive is 50 feet. Anagram is requesting a waiver through th
e
P
U
D
t
o
permit a 371/2 setback. The setback waiver is reasonable since parking can be screened
a
n
d
m
o
r
e
green above the Code is provided on the adjoining street (37 1/2 feet versus 25 feet re
q
u
i
r
e
d
)
.
Anagram
Staff Report
Page Three
ARCHITECTURE
There are two architectural requirements that impact the colors and exterior materials used on
this building. One is the City Code requirement which would allow the use of decorative
concrete. The other is a PUD design framework for brick, glass, stone or an equivalent. The
building, as proposed, is 69% aggregate panel, 23% brick, glass or equivalent, and 8% dryvit.
The building, as proposed, can be considered compatible with the PUD based on the following:
1. The color selection is similar to the PUD. Red, blue, green, yellow and grey are found
on other buildings within the Edenvale PUD.
2. Brick is used as an architectural feature which relates to the use of brick on other
buildings across the street.
3. The building design is not typical for an industrial building. Use of glass, balconies,
building jogs, brick detailing and special color banding add interest to the building,
making it less industrial looking.
4. The aggregate panel and dryvit are durable materials that are better in grade than typical
concrete panels, but not considered in City Code to be equivalent to brick, but since this
is not a requirement of the industrial districts more flexibility may be allowed in this
P.U.D.. A 50% credit could be given since this site is part of a PUD. This would make
the brick, glass or equivalent materials total about 70% which would be consistent with
other buildings in the area.
5. The extensive use of berming, increased setbacks, and heavy landscaping comparable to
the Flagship Athletic Club help soften the view of the use of aggregate panel.
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING
The City Code requires that mechanical equipment be screened with a metal panel of materials
and colors to match the building. The mechanical unit plan indicates a total of 20 mechanical
units located on top of the Phase I. Screening is proposed to be either a pre-finished metal panel
or by means of location supported by sight lines.
Experience has shown that screening of mechanical units cannot rely on sight lines. The
visibility of mechanical equipment can only be determined after the units are placed on top of
the building. It is recommended that the mechanical units be grouped in as close of a location
as possible and screened with a continuous metal panel around the exterior of the area. If this
is not possible, an alternative would be to provide an architectural parapet wall around the
building's exterior or screen each individual unit.
Anagram
Staff Report
Page Four
LANDSCAPING
Phase I landscaping requirements are 664" based on building square footage and 88" of tree
replacement for a total of 752". Credit is given to tree plantings along Valley View Road which
reduces the tree requirement to 676". The landscape plan shows 654". There is room to provide
the required 22 additional inches as landscaping can be extended further north along Executive
Drive. This would provide for a landscaped area along the site perimeter.
Phase II and Ill landscaping requirements are 507". There is some room on site to plant
additional trees; however, the majority of the plant material will have to be located along the
berm along Valley View Road, (this will provide a better transition to the residential areas to the
north), and boulevard tree plantings on private property throughout the balance of the PUD.
GRADING
The site has been previously graded. Grading is intended to provide a level building pad for
building and parking. Berming is proposed to screen the parking and loading areas. The berm
along the northeast side of the building should be raised an additional 3-5' to better screen the
loading area.
UTILITIES
There is existing sewer, water and storm sewer in Executive Drive.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The property is currently zoned 1-2 Park. The preliminary plat request is for four industrial lots.
All lots meet City Code requirements. If Anagram proceeds to Phases II and III, replatting to
combine lots will be required. If not, it will be required that detailed plans be reviewed by the
Planning Commission and City Council prior to the issuance of building permits.
NOISE
Staff visited Anagram International in Edina and observed no excessive noise at the building front
or at the exterior of the property along the adjoining street. However, there was considerable
noise emitted through the vents at the rear of the building. In the final design of the building,
these air vents should be directed away from residential areas.
SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
There is an existing 5' wide concrete sidewalk along Executive Drive and the south side of
Equitable Drive. There are sidewalk connections from the existing building to this sidewalk
Anagram
Staff Report
Page Five
system. In addition, there will be an 8' wide bituminous trail along Purgatory Creek as part of
the overall approved trail system for the 100 acre PUD.
LIGHTING
Lighting for this project should be of similar design and type to the existing lights throughout
the PUD. This would be a 20' high, downcast, cutoff luminar (shoebox) design.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff would recommend approval of the request for PUD Concept Amendment on 15.5
acres, PUD District Review on 15.5 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Park District
on 15.5 acres, Site Plan Review on 15.5 acres and Preliminary Plat of 15.5 acres into 4 lots
based on plans dated May 2, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated May
10, 1991, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall modify the landscaping plan to provide an
additional 22 caliper inches. This could be located by extending the landscaping along
the east side of Executive Drive north to Valley View Road. Raise the loading area berm
3-5 feet.
2. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, erosion control and utility plans for review
by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the
Watershed District.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Provide samples of exterior materials, mechanical equipment screening, and
lighting standards for review.
B. Provide final plans for review by the Fire Marshal.
C. Include provisions in the building plans for directing air vents away from the
residential areas across Valley View Road.
4. Planned Unit Development waivers would be granted for base area ratio from .30 to .34,
and a front yard setback waiver to parking from 50 feet to 371/2 feet.
5. The public, private plaza is intended to allow use by the general public for sitting and
Anagram
Staff Report
Page Six
picnicing. The City and Anagram must further define the specifics of what elements will
be in the plaza and necessary easements to be granted for public use.
6. If Anagram proceeds to Phases II and III replatting to eliminate lot lines will be
necessary.
7. If Anagram does not proceed to Phases II and III zoning and site plan review by the
Planning Commission and City Council will be required for the individual industrial lots.
10 n
MAY 21.1991
14837 JIM BERGSTROM
-ADVANCE FOR CONFERENCE EXPENSES-POLICE
115.00 DEPT
14838 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
POSTAGE-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER
1808_ 14839 BRINGERS
EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL
62.: 14840 BRINGERS
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
88.70 14841 BIRTCHER WELSH
MAY 91 RENT-CITY HALL
2171)7.14 14842 COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE -DEPOSIT -MHFA MINNESOTA CITIES
6442.97 PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
14843 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY -COLORED COPY PAPER-RECREATION
448.96 ADMINISTRATION
14844 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC
MAY 91 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
5149.52 14845 VOID OUT CHECK
0.00 14846 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
SERVICE
17.85 14847 AT&T
SERVICE
380.30 14848 AT&T
SERVICE
130.60 14849 MINNEGASCO
SERVICE
8108.44 14850 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
SERVICE
97.14 14851 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
SERVICE
1037.06 14852 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS
SERVICE
4864.29 14853 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
155.00 14854 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
PAYROLL 4/19/91
6284.00 14855 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
194.76 14856 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457
PAYROLL 4/19/91
2068.72 14857 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
PAYROLL 4/19/91
32.00 14858 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC
MAY 91 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
17675.70 14859 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION
PAYROLL 4/19/91
25.00 14860 MINNESOTA UC FUND
1ST QUARTER 91 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
6909.05 14861 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS
PAYROLLS 4/5/91 & 4/19/91
1140.00 14862 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OF MN
MAY 91 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
32670.' 14863 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
PAYROLL 4/19/91
33028: 14864 UNITED WAY
PAYROLL 4/19/91
218.25 14865 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY -HITCH PARTS/BRAKE CABLES/U -JOINTS/TOOL
3729.92 -BOX/OIL SEALS/SEAT COVERS/MIRRORS/FILTERS/
-RELECTORS/LAMPSACEEL CYLINDERS/HORNS/
-ANTENNAS/BEARINGS/SPLASH GUARDS/GASKETS/
-BOLTS-UTILITIES DIVISION/FACILITIES DEPT/
PARK MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
14866 DELEGARD TOOL CO
-CABLE TIES/REELS/SOCKETS/MULTIMETER/HAND 465.70 -JACK-STREET MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/
COMMUNITY CENTER
14867 MICHAEL OTOOLE ENTERPRISES -COMMISSIONER FEE-LARKSPUR LANE TRAIL 820.50 EASEMENT CONDEMNATION
14868 TERRENCE M JOHNSON MAI SRA -COMMISSIONER FEE-LARKSPUR LANE TRAIL 823.86 EASEMENT CONDEMNATION
14869 MAllITELLI & ASSOCIATES PA -COMMISSIONER FEES-LARKSPUR LANE TRAIL 826.20 EASEMENT CONDEMNATION
14870 RUSSELL SMITH ASSOCIATES INC -SERVICE-LARKSPUR LANE TRAIL EASEMENT 650.00 CONDEMNATION
14871 HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT -FINAL SETTLEMENT-PRESERVE TRAIL 500.00 CONDEMNATION
14872 LMC HOUSING BUREAU
CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL 429.00 14873 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL 330.00 14874 PETTY CASH-COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 26.15 14875 PETTY CASH
EXPENSES-CITY HALL 94." 14876 STATE OF MINNESOTA
BIKE REGISTRATIONS 85
15977155