Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/18/1991 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW AGENDA THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 1991 7:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS: Chairman Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, City Assessor • Steve Sinell, Hennepin County Representative Larry Miller, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Personal Appeals • B. Written Communications • C. Schedule Reconvene III. CLOSE MEETING MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council/Eden Prairie Board of Review Through: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager From: Steven R. Sinell, City Assessor 4 Date: April 12, 1991 Subject: April 19th, 1991 Board of Review Meeting The deadline for returning Board of Review applications was April 1, 1991. Rs of the end of the day, April 11, we have 27 active appeals to be considered on Thursday April 18 at 7:00 PM. Ue have attached a list of the appeals and copies of the taxpayer applications. It's likely that some of these appeals will be resolved prior to the meeting and additional applications returned. Ue will provide the board with an updated list of appeals and copies of any new applications on Thursday night. The board has 20 calendar days to complete their work. The board can meet as many times as necessary during those 20 days. Most years the board meets, hears appeals, refers items to the assessor for review, and sets a meeting date 20 days later. The last date the board could legally reconvene is Tuesday May 7th. Prior to the reconvene of the Board of Review meeting the Assessing • Staff will complete review appraisals on those appeals directed back to us and provide a copy to the board and the taxpayer. Additional information regarding the Board of Review's duties was included with the City Assessor's Report of March 4, 1991. The value notices were sent on March 8th to all 14,880 property owners in the city. Since then the assessing staff has fielded over 800 phone calls. Most of the calls were to double check information regarding property values or homestead classifications. The results of these inquiries are; 268 values were corrected, 135 additional homesteads were approved, and 27 appeals are scheduled to be heard by the Board of Review. t' Board of Review Appeals as of 4/11/91 4:30 PM Appeal # Name PIO Appraiser #1 Arnie Fjelland 24-116-22 21 0025 EZ *2 Richard & Catherine Ellenson 17-116-22 12 0068 EZ #3 Gordon Stodola 05-116-22 42 0003 EZ #4 Dennis Nordberg 35-116-22 11 0083 EZ *5 John Davis II 24-116-22 43 0036 EZ #6 Andrzej Peczalski 25-116-22 41 0039 DJ *7 Gerald & Rose Ann Jensen 07-116-22 42 0040 DJ #8 Fred Purcell 21-116-22 22 0024 BC #9 Stanley & Gretchen Dorr 16-116-22 43 0037 BC *10 Bruce & Kathy Riemer 22-116-22 12 0028 BC #11 Leonard Kodet 04-116-22 23 0039 BC #12 Ronald Anderson 16-116-22 33 0010 BC #13 Louise & Dale Schurle 02-116-22 12 0024 BC #14 Michael & Kathleen Hammill 02-116-22 12 0062 BC #15 Michael Pan 17-116-22 21 0017 LL *16 Marshall Simons 15-116-22 33 0015 LL #17 Raymond Rice 17-116-22 24 0015 LL #18 Donald & Yvette Paton 17-116-22 13 0025 LL #19 Raymond & Christine Murray 05-116-22 14 0018 JS #20 Robert Wiens 05-116-22 14 0057 JS #21 Lonny & Alison Gulden 23-116-22 13 0018 JS #22 Mark Peterka 26-116-22 44 0043 JS #23 Elizabeth McCartney 12-116-22 44 0001 SS #24 Scott Elfstrom/ 23-116-22 14 0039 SS Lake Place Apartments 23-116-22 14 0040 SS *25 Marriott Corporation 11-116-22 44 0021 SS #26 Residence Inn/Marriott 11-116-22 43 0003 SS #27 Donald Bromen 11-116-22 42 0041 SS yr� �� t /.. y APPLICATION FORK 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW RECT APR 1 1991 PID# 24-116-22-21-0025Appeal* / Appraiser EEZ Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - plea a print) Telephone Home: y - -a [� . Work: 1'y� Q Name: l/r r/,'e / / G//Q/fie / f� Address of Property: �} /,0/ ge,icv / 1/ilyt January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S .2c? 4OQ Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: $ 76) Purchase p,rice: $ ' Additions/end alterations since purchase: /24-..14/ 1.4/2A�� q Od Cos of ad itions and alterations: (2, Is property listed for sale? Aid It yes, at what price S • (attach copy of listing agreement) r/c^ Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S __ _U_ What are your reasons or documentation supportin the above stated vallue? Please a /ac st po, tin in ormat on))• � si i/, oa,r �a.t /d - 7 -L/�/ �cj / . I ,I. it 97.fd J pq J 2.29 'y� 5 C)' /�1!J /'�Q� i c ,<,�,f{— 3o Do,' b-. -7i •/{? rf sd ���. - 774 r[.s.j v`t .b , .� fiq • a'C/Y /yew k arf .� cl// ie.,., Signatur Of er Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in - preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Totall,, Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 65000 142600 20/bOO Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 52000 135700 187700 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 50300 131300 181600 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 3_/21/_31 Appraiser: Farl 7pnt Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 5/89 - Kitchen Remodel Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments /Z/89 CRV S 140.000 WD --/ /_ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained A APPLICATION FORH .. 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW D APR 1 1991 PID#]7_11A_22-12-011AR Appeal# 2 Appraiser EEZ Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: '37-Yu)0 Work: Name: Richard and ;atheriee :11en on Address of Property: Terrey 'ine :%rive, ,th: :'rairie, P.H ' 47 January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S '':''-0) Terms of Purchase: :ontract for DQed Date property acquired: 13 Purchase price: S ?'-:a00.00 Additions and alterations since purchase: ;ee Attached ;i;eet 4w Cost of additions and alterations: ;ee Attached ;heat Is property listed tor sale? •o It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ 75:000.00 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): ;e.e Attaches ;beet -* Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 15000 62300 77300 Res. Homestead Jaw. 2, 1939 15200 49100 64300 Ras HnmPctPad Jan. 2, 1988 14500 46800 61300 PPS HnmectePd Last Inspection: 9/_k/3.2 Appraiser:Farl lent Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 12/_/ 87 CRV S 74000 11% CD -3/ / 84 CRV S 72725 WD Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained dichar.d and :athorine dllenson 1 .erney rive +dr. en .rairic, 5347 , hone: (.;12) '�7-. :?o • ,_91 property acuired - 11 c urchase ?rice - 7%=,000.00 Assessed Lar.et 'ialae - if,d 7-)1,°00.00 Additions and Alterations :.ince .rrcha se: The only :or: :le have partly consisted is sheetroc:in • one (1) room and one 1) 1/3-lath in the basement. This area. .:as framed in and rou:h nlumbin and nirin; done when we purchased the property. :!e have sheetroc:red, installed four (1) doors and hard;are, tiled in ,ath and installed toilet, cabinets and sin::, • and finish :ooi:ror-:. This is the only thin; :.-c have added to this property since :„ purchased it. The total cost for materials ran: aterials Jid all of the :Tor_: r:Tsel1, ::bo.rt 0 hours ? 3 1.7.00 _per hr. This ::ould amount to Y; 740.00 About one-half of this .ror:: ca:; done in 1y3'? and one-half in 1),0. Q17f1.1) 1);''r A se:;sed i.ar?et Value . 4, 00.00 Add material and labor 1,7+1.10 .rJ,,..1.10 :f es;ea;n...ant increases for 1);0 ras the same as 193') 3 3,000,00 J.'r valuation '-orad ;;),0'14.10 not 1.„ . 77,7)0.00 APPLICATION FORH 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW 1dulN 2 c 1901 Pit)* 05-115-2242-0003 Appeal* S Appraiser_EEZ Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 931/-2/8 / Work: `'36-;s3/ Name: �'vrcer .c7/od,�/G Address of Property: JhC Y/ Arm. ! vv January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ USDOO ¶.tom Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: /5£0 ? Purchase price: $ pCU Additions and alterations since purchase: Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed for sale? /(/p If yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior.year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 19300 193 0 _ Res. Land Jan. 2, 1989 19300 19300 _ Res. Land Jan. 2, 1988 18700 18700 Res. Land Last Inspection: 10/ 2/ 90 Appraiser:Earl Zent Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 5 / /78 CRV $ 5000 WD — Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained APPLICATION FOR11 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW • // Ai-a iygy PID#35-116-22-11-0083 Appeal# ! Appraiser EEZ Date Recd. / - (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 9 -looa "� Work: —370.3 Name: ,Z2EiVNiS T7. >,e,.D/_3Ei-67 Address of Property: /0 ./ 3,eo4(..)/1./, ,t'/1'f (,ecL' January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $..Z/g/ /00 Terms of Purchase: /Y/76E �/ Date property acquired: Purchase price: SJ,1.5/ 4' %� Additions and alterations since purchase: /9y_y—,L 5 i. /7,749 Ccs- of 575"j .ate 4r,1 rosrrFss,ova Cost of additions and alterat*ons: MY— ad ..Srk4'r1),;b0F.WA 7C'D ' /990—C4e/E.Aq, ,eo✓.arAccSTot .;4.5v IS property listed for sale? It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is, $/6 'e%GO What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above tated value? (Please attach supportin inform7ation): �/£ Ltt..4eL. ,a?... TsC <e ./l4s .:e4KK �4..cc. r 1 /99,e; .v7:GLL L metf/l7luc sucK cz, (99/ `!L/selawc< `T �•� "c ( ./("//i? —A'S nee — /9 zoo) 99e Cif. c ., toi-^a•7r% tt tl.�LL1.a.-e-et- 1J4r v 41-7-.'"it t../ �vcdict�-2i.�.rc , •t SG9� _(;ate .✓. //, j.?f�Zri �}, �., ec� ( Signature of Owner JT Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building P-tal Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 54500 141400 195900 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 54500 141400 195900 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 50000 129800 179800 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: /3/gl Appraiser:Fart 7ent Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 11 / / 83 CRV $ 185462 WD Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained • 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW State Law requires the City Assessor to determine the market value and classification of all real estate properties within the City of Eden Prairie as of January 2, 1991. These values are the basis for property taxes payable in 1992. Also, by State Law the Board of Review meets each year to hear appeals on market value or classification. Please remember that the Board does not hear appeals on amounts or rates of property taxation, nor the percentage increase in market value from year-to-year. The Board may sustain, increase, or decrease the Assessor's market value of the appellant's property as the Board deems appropriate. • The City Council (Councilmembers constitute the Board of Review) has directed that those persons who desire to appear before the Board are strongly encouraged to complete the attached application and submit same to the City-Assessor's Office on or before Monday, April 1, 1991. This will provide an opportunity for the City Assessor's Office to properly review the appeal and to present a more complete analysis and recommendation at the Board's meeting on April 18. The Board also encourages appellants to confer with the City Assessor prior to the April 18 meeting. Often appeals can be resolved at that level and appellants do not need to appear before the Board. At the Board meeting on April 18, each appellant will be allowed five minutes to address the Board and summarize their appeal. The Board may reach a decision or refer specific appeals back to the City Assessor for more review and further consideration at the reconvene, which is tentatively scheduled for May 7. Again, please complete the attached form and submit to the City Assessor's Office at City Hall, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, on or . befoil 1, 1991. EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW Douglas Tenpas, Chairperson Richard Anderson Jean Harris H. Martin Jessen Patricia Pidcock • • '.`r"Ci • 41w111 City01 Edan N., fCon11nu.dt AP Iw m 5fw I n . 1w *30 l 6w3 SA PIa11748 PpW1-• 116 6.1 16n Tuw S T V. C604 M 0.44 IT 1.. 0. No C 1 0, bM S40L.a46.3MR1 r10 116016 614616 LT 10229 6L2M OM( n10.606 CO l 64 I e10/ 1621 J416 7211611WE01 MIII22C01175 I013I 7151Ap oHl 10f Y413 CO L R00 I el ID IOIt n5M 7R YL60SI MI622a0000 102K MEYW.11E OM 6 C0 1 WOO / 6110 IOU/ A. M1LY61 KS? M/I6MO6W IR M W.1004 02. 1000c ISOIl1000410( 2.4.201 r3YAIOr M A 26000 IMO .9157E OW 000 T96 9L63 af10 3W 3110W/o*ESf 15116 21 11 0052 M. R011050 I L 6 LG060 141604*3660,669*66 n A 11300 9110E 711120 06 000 1910 12410E 066/00W 277YW1w6i 111I12212630 1071E 04C61CMM VO4WL11116n A 7N10 6110 1170R OW 000101E 4600M10 IL 2RM.10160R61 K116II12W04 10A6 WIC 5W w 4111scwa•UA45(l.w N A 2900 900 WIN IW 000 1910 V717 0619 IW 2721114150061 K110L'124155 1027,, 41.O51M611 A 2AA0 42,.90 1647E 00 0W 1919 M.061 10 SR6LWI MO 14 116 2112 4W. 61:4 61.03 iiAke N A 1a T. .11 OW OW 113 9500E OW 1130 1121.11.3 6062212061 111010110.0 11110 GR MPAEI6 FLAW. 01/61611A A 460. 0500 0960) ]Wt.e 2100E 006 191E 11150)tan 26. 3/60WR41A2011016 0111I12I/0112 70411 a0011LW16 6E316611.6416 1120 6 2311 >ORO 166 06 000 160 21 2101p0N4/ND0100 431162273060 1666 666.W4uorroLW 1.1111016M.6 n Inn 0050E 16776 0W 0101v.. `12 Jib mown 4621010E IA0671710071 1611 002011CCAa1.5L1FTY 4E6.4C0A6TW II WM 900 23II91 OW 000 191E 151900 0GY 71LW 2760o.f4F11A0000 .1t42123OK1 114! 600.1.00E M 701E 600 1660E On 031 1961 6110 006 250 276 411.16.01 1166011 6162221 MU 1.1 1006.4711134911 14 WOO *160 6116 00 000 1916 1077E.716 14313 I10M40410110011 611112220M2 6M 106/ 04602 IE a610WA162 161E 1066E Mn6 00 OW iW 16Rn 0Y6/143 21610664W216.6 04116221301.J 4111 00411E0 1 EA 6E600.51.6, A N0 2110 01672 04170E 17000E 011 11000 /701606441110001 6111271116+ 65 O0 0 3000L0150 010 61 i...01.1.1.4. N 31E IOS6 014 W 0W 100E 11w0 OL 2K 276M644A0KO1 W1622:o oWS 1694 CCI?1W1 G02e51AI010 120E 10101 Ill./ 00 031 191 125H 7v6 RO0 167.010202100*0. 6 116 22 21 006 73w. 11140261.040 W4 R1AW111.111..,066 M 21.6 1016E 2515W Oat 000W 1 I/116 066 w 216M10R Y.611.66 0111.230675 74. W40J104 0.0.1E r4J00a 01E 14 1/0 19121/ 000 .'4 OW 0/W6 CO4 S74M6W40W2.0010 W A4I7221MK7 11 010W 1664 00*007FNO 4616 Al(WM140431 0 r1 2/00 000 MAW OW 00191/ 14165.7 6 216060EM410T03000 061161.12E WM 1. 10 An.6 C AREWR 1.160401006 WM. n 216E 160 252461 /6 600 196 11176 614 110w 1f*Wax 0t2N.9OKDN 6 116 22 210077 .6 MC 00NCE0l111.19. 16,13 4061E E 1f0000 n 12000 RHO IROSI 00 10 10001E 166 613w 2/64100440010300 6 111 22/1609 10.112 C61C00A.056C1N 131000934300 n 07074 610E 1656 00 00 162 12976 016 W 2104Q11WNA0600 6116222301E 017 0000140J0u50 n 77700 WOO 11410 0W 00 ILI I.0117 090w 116700661147.1006 6,62216TM 1'10 00.00.11COWiW 1.16.15611. I 210E TWO 164.1E 000 06/ILT 11660 02217 no 2761100.01 46 116 12 2 3O3J1 1'0/9 St 0MWA01TAJM.N0101 OM AN 14 110E 1161 16644 On 00 107 110116 Iv1I 6110 24000006n 611013230000 19636 Ka.61. to 210n R60 IV. 40 /W 106 1240)OLII /10w 2/6r1010Calm 61141n21 15 1910E I0M1006 l 031*.ACLOW 0A30090111.431.60007 n 210E IOW 1161.6 003 ea 70*2 101610 0017 0011 3/011010 01110 010622230. 1911/ P100.116.01. A 700E 091E 111101 00 00 7967 67505 0917 240 1/6040410 0/1612/706 15131 0 t 1103E3114134115 &RAL01.166 El1w0111 n 210E 161E 12116 OW 00 III? 10..110E 146 11003 3l O 71.7}71714,T 19,11 SJW1601CLW61N 6601T4CO0*41660 n 21003 4400 192412 OW Ole 116E 11160 0134 26011 21.0404401 6062213704E 6102 01006111E n 210E 4.0 1.12 04* 01.92 196 11560 0176 701w 110M6540, 6162223010 91/0 a 5.1101010 006p 00/CCU ad.II6 3CIIIOEM N 7100E W0 1204.16 OM 000106 9100 ot1 226w 2/6MII040N 6116712]0C 110 0 0 A 61N1716F 10401 06966 1 1 1.461 8 901 n 770E 1740 146030 00 00 11156 14e/66+20 17000100411, 0606717.107* ' 1116 .60111066406 v l 77164610 0141441+704A1071406.115 60 20 /2101 11337E 030 00 162 0160 006 lllw 1761.06..4(10 06 16 72 21 64f 1')201 0006010A 424465 GA 49051106/110 A 21011 600 111120 OW 0.00 IL/ 917410 01/00.606 2261015310 61101211016 I600 0\W C0 WAD 06011104615647111 N A 12260 19/26 WI OW 0W 151E 6000 0Y6 0 271C11EO7100E(5II7F1 34166nolo01 41.1 0.rtir64116 40417WR 6RM606106*11 n A Irmo 00w0 16,60 00 O0 1L5 T0000 17l45 W 2R O.A611110115 K77671+1w4. 6 7 ; 301.065I 0 t KC101/ S710Hh*1102. 0 a 172000 1.10E 611176 0000001544 in MITI,4011(171f3S O.lIC:2100o 60WNf1Wt0 601 J36.6113111 4OB4 w 4460116601111 M A 000 17400 006 00 OW 7R605M951 25170221102) 106/ 04 M.O. 06+110 111004241610W4 n A 3111E 11110 3566 00 070 111501 0707E 200 777 1*215 MST 111102111, 040 A16A6A Al0A64R A11W7A46401 p0fn 41257E 00 06'6 7776615Mt1 11114771012E Ana.. 01 W 1l 5 WW1 10 m ;..14 5 2726u700757 :116:111..1,,,. D 61NOMOf0, 10 65 4 4 616 wwlw n A 160 I161 (20264 00 .76 709.4 Ili,y w 2I26415 MST 15110:21I.1 0,01 A 064064VY(604M TV - 53RN 00 070 1W 26Y66 11/69 212YM01M111 " M45PM0: ♦1.0.0.MY .4 A IWO 60W 3K1.6 0W 00 211w 1064.41E ]011.2706616 •,11WWi MI Oa 4'A6 Olt'.9.PI1T3.6(TY 1.0..A4laA n A 33961 40 IOW% 0W 000 11K Ill 27211R3T770 01 116 22 126622224. 2II02711460 WM0111M 651PW 19pf R 110A0 214E 0224 00 ON 1/L 712 1Ru0 6110 0 12 116R 12 116 22 22 4V. 111E A 1170101E 4 J 010441.4 1106601411714700*141 A 170E 111014 e/11 W].1T1 11/441 113116 3016 W 091 27244617110111071 121167277G, 000 176.21E 616.1..21E M A K K10 16 0 1UL6 e e0 IY2 TI 1L1 051 2R0PLAMO1111422 1,116117114.17 1 o r JC 44 t0CW 0.5(4661N1404W l e10 0 .13K 010 90 LO..M .9,4441466. . 4..717 1037N6CI MOO 21L01\116101 614116 161e606W6 N 32 12116 610 1411 203* OW 113 7544 12100 low 272 27$141031310131,1 611/2211W.0 IS,. 5A40104044 Al 1611 6100 210/11 00 063 POI 7000 066 60094 172 M 163040521E AG. 0n62211061 ISM To 6.002 I Al A60Rw* NOMA6+001M0 N A2 II700 070 NIT OW 6.62 ILI 4001E 001E EJW 272M...AO ton 99 116 2111 000 11. 3043404C0400 1044 04 474301771.OE04 A AJ 111E 130 4110 044 00 7501 61,03737 796 2.91f 6.6 766.0014 01167170.3 77477 al/...L. WI210I410 0 A2 1000 -ma 9711a 0W OW IWO 1+44 OtW 296 272 MW+0003210Kw. 00 116/111 44. 6710 061.M40420 70.(44111220 n 02 11110 706 11400 00 00196 90*00 146 1224 en 77oet.144*.5700 4W. 061100131424 15710 1144r*1501 t 11,0114 00 .0461Lf MAW n A7 1209 1110 6610 GOO OW ILl 6000 I2139 71G 2770611.601I1613 AWN 01012211 0012 216111161.6 6f07 A7040700 n At 111E 161E 611 00 00.1 401E 01,6 101W 272 16 001.06 M1600 61107237064 15'4 Alf t510 .6616l161 n AI .'OW 161E 117E 4171E 000 IIM "660 0667 00w 71+1111W 4065 AE 0000. 2i115^11094 120711340111,70131 n al 116E 1520E 6116 060 OW 1611 69060 456 20200 172710 0114403:NO KCII 011162,116, 1521E 41W 4730 A Al 124* 17* /236 06 00 001 i:'WW 043 140 7I2011.4 61141.00n 040621114131 15214 4a1Rfi7200W50 M M 120E 66.16 L/% OW 000 161 SAW 1. 116w 7R Of MEADOWS 71030E 6.102;116161 10711 1163101006 i0040524YW1o0MW.f AS 1100 160E 261.e ON 0011E 1160 0W11 00011 21211E 1*3100110031n 0971622 J1SIN 14719 7161E/.. 61.11141W0666, W 111v 610 7M6 00 070.0 0 OW Ew 22 M16063221.004. 66770671 020 21009060414/160a4 00131ENIb a.6A al 2 W 072 w 2310 711E 411 217116U620 09141711004 1526 Dw JO..11J60.044 001616,60043A6600 N 2E 10 611516 OW OW 160 40 166 NOW 271110. 006w 0011.11 We 9675 11C POT. 61I1GI 010510*EM 40A4 MO .0 67110 1W IW 11I770 W 0141 /11W 7720 [FAI1L COX X 2511.416. 9,64 64 1CwI71A.6 1/41.104s*1* 1]20 1711E 1171R 00 00 t20N W117 64W 77.101E f.1316W1039 2511/^616M4 6i2 01502M1 4(A40LI54E.1410. 3110E 1576-717775 323 OW 122LY 026 YKW 272 PAW0 TIS7Y0 ADM 2 5 114 22 1 00W WI J107R14 JINM1630*00 U. 3C6 E1tl 10117E On 00 1426 001! 272 w6M6(A37110,0 2504224100M M110 PA5100\5 AVOW P0l0 n IMWM 114 11016 211IL 033 4W 3e.0041 40w 272150 E45f1410E H1112214 7 '111 742170E a*10 3300 1636 26712 00 0n 1®1 040E 614w 2RPIW116W1101on H1112241,7 9095 0000I 1I36A MINI 110.6610 220 111E .120 7* 0W 00 1a1./ MOO 2RRMW41651.6. 25 01.0 2 17 19114 N / 9/15 M40PILL I010.0/00Y 290E IOHW 2Y11 00) 00 town 10J11 2227RWe WIWI.00 36621/006 1651 003340'3065 a.. 2007* 610E 0W4 00 00 0,0 056 000 211070E 141120 400 1(106226061 6645 1610.E NC.61061063102 116 610 1116303 06 031 960E 07)6 4W 21122.61 EWW1 yL000. 7506R14WNw2 .6.0 JIMMY.61Y N01MW 0691 M7743 pOMMtt 2701E T1W 111(1144 0W 0W It79R ON60 0*3 270b4&f63T= 21116::1IJuO` 94'V 06770404E bLLE.114W56. 1}M 7600 tow4 060 00 10010E 0113.al 272 OW.EAST 1M0 WON 11110:'C0.0 1W0 A1101F60.AEtn 1664I4416W 4103E M210 1166 19W16 00 OW 1259E W'1!6. 0R 6M0e Lif1K0000k 25 0622 1 605 161 1140770100061 64110090041019 1106 671E 231026 OW 00 050E 64/1 272 PP04 IASI 1014. 25I16120016 , G41 C(01 .44,013CW1111 M00 1L 1711M 274 010 0 0 71400 060 W 272PAKW E6MKd 11 75 114 24 01 01E 04". 6.2*40 T�LF43C'1 40*0 0 7 711�1 �11717351111 0 Oi 75 27* l7'6I�6[3Ml'004* 1 TC SS 1011E it 2064014 11/C60.20 21900 913E 21W6 000 00 72660 I.W. 272 9560 0157.00000 21116 E11119 0115 761110040 770303 a t1C11(11/M6 111E 1111111E 2.0212 00 661901 Ill 712 713411 WI 47773003 211167263111 01.66017.05191171 33,041110111€I6u 71431 151E 0169E 80 000 NO 11550 101 EEC 217 PWM14371N641N 75111.60,0 Oov.. 111/W 251UK 00 00 13.0 0Y16 0 777MM0(At/1M674w 91,471E 41,7 A in 6466E a01301•,n1Av 269EA6 2/7W 7100 4507E OW 0W 1L5 2WW 2121033E 365T 4M AWN 25114201W1. .001E 2014p17J Mr4M'.1a01 A3W*J*03313 DI 111E I0/w 161) 0W 00 1L1 10006 0105 16aw 71211WY041.6. 75106214W4 0411WI(i 016141.6066urw1 2316 6134* 001416 00 630 W.016 611E 272 1A.616(431 401004 2511221 703E . 61.0601 1111E 160E 1066 On OW 1116 ON 1)+w 2124.01*061317.4. 01162244. 075013E 10 11,4E 11.0E 7.0 12716 UP 00 1,411.111 117/6 w 77/01,fast 410 606E 7511472 C11, ..b 4A10N.STK\C.110,13 :TM IOW 71010 On 0W ILS 200 *11371n... 21E W1 14 1T4n76116 10 4E 0.34 000 0W IW WW1 00E ROW 2RIP4W401 03. 2011033 C 10+ p20045 014,64. 01 WARE 1130100 10 660 111053 07 060 611E 06 Haw 17007701E 67 0041 00n 251622 06: n71 5101701E 517H016660 0.46 24101 7660 733.14 00 07* 10660 0605 MG 272 .Wf6715M0N 25617160,.. Pl I116.61 OwIAA MWSON 790 377E 11:96 On 00 11001E.6 266 277 P.M F66T 4MY1W .1 H47 466�711 16A7 03010 0. p*LPA11404P50 MO IRW 1ROL 0000 10126 II6a0, 0*0401116 ARMY M0 101% 11116 OW 00 491E 1716 660w 2n 01 66/0/4772+00 H701R1J101 441 10401166 .6040.M 011116 150E .0 151344 030 000I916 11.33 40W 712 811.E40T 01.000E 25 66 22 1109E 011E 16 0.6 11T0NM.1i0E65 1+100 140 15904 60 000 6.11E 041 096W 777 M.E34T4M0Wn 29061660 1^.e0 ..6064(61114 a t.616W ......W..91 .7 1170E in. 00 00 Wow W6.0 male...... .5116,24.C. CoO�'r en11707 PI 11 not OP n 300,3,nn'Pubhsnn nas made 69ery ett0n l0 o6an xCSAMe arld Glalera irdo2mat46l Md n rq InarvSer 4111e n2orina5lon tle7en tjuara.ated, m p 2/N 10 s cluse1l Ely me ne(plgence o16ry u105 a81715 n employees 4 ploc4llg,GOr1PWnq,DI putl61mg 2ne 5a10 M116ma14n. II • cm,N F111 P711111 161r1111101Q 0 • lr M 1w. • IN u 1y I to IN ►ICI 1717 114.04 1 T YJw�P� �..i�f'7TZ-Qw.TI Ti4.-a711�L Si4604. R3 YW IW/▪ 0L10JWFR OJIONII.rtOMJM• n 0 WIN Imb 7tl11i 1w Om 100 MU OM • Iww1QB1M01 wn{aawn 11111 611110.0101111 MMYWf 6N1W«IN x 0 MM 11b 110m in WO 100 40 4211*MMbr MI1NaawM 11A 4W3773fM{f Y11C016O4 00WOW.YEW YJlOw{wl II Ilb Iwb MO 6w Ow 100t10r 011l iW R WOMQMIAIOI 0116a7N1 IMO 56010*MN•7N 0 I I'YO 0101 7227710 000 Om MU 710 1421010WY MON= 01442372•11 11W 0110 6201116W226210 -2101171160@YYJFOi 4 ( 6100 0 12501 Om nm 17Q11T AVIA 721'11 000Y411D6 TN)AWN 12I1477236t 160 01 DOOM) N0OR06 MOW i IMP! N 0 71O 10W MIA 000 40 IVY IMW e011 M 1oN41011040R •114aa*n I1W1 YI6000Mn1 10N0 6 11 30 3 47F 1104743 0 0 at01 IT0 76•)1 Ow OW 100 lab OIA IWMQl11700I«r •1Naar1 11111 IW1 2OM .416,1Nr7 IWO0A01w00WW2 140 MO Iwo Map LW Om 11 112b OM TOW 1106.206.062160 •714aa*T Tf®�CR=CR A 62 WW1. L1C7Nl CA1L12.lxb! 4 l NINm 4 15071 0Q !m MOOS RRO�W 160016(M7NIAWN 9 1 A 710111 �YRSiG7�' .�f14'l17J5171 11051 060541111.60111 N 170n IM 1r14 •W or MU 760I MP 011 W 104QM141 01 011122100.11 100 6020400E L C6MAN ■JI10MY0Y0 N 71001 MIN MUM 601 10 1117 NNW ON 111 W /001/12060 01I4712316 1071 fl 0IR101s01.lo41006 01M14004 01b/0 4 270W 01W 26261 Iw •W MAP MOM 1In7 r R 10«47.11 611422230411 O M4N4 77 7NW T1 11.6 IN on 1111 ia1 0N111nw 004NQ•4 •Inna0O0 1111 15�1i411J0401 1MYJ400YLWM1A000W Pr 411W I01470 Om Om 07 1 =10 OW 100 W 10IO4 M14 •tital11= Ilia UMW1MOW 11 TM 01b 1503 ON IN 107 RMS 647 f11w MOM Q01 0210227661 Ilia 01111016L CJ1NOS1 21144016 0161162111=1 11 17/ 1*1) 114. 120 IS IV? I•r ,r 711 R 1011026 MI NO aamr 2II11 3JMIEMI CI WIIM WW1 Lar MMa 4 VOW =O111 31011 /w IO111 11r00 *311TOR 10101.00111 10422a000 MY 06113421 - 11201 01110 110112 •O 101q110 IIvq 01W 142W 10o4QF1 01422a001 11171 06112002W0 L 2Cl11006 WOWS 4 LAMA 40W1000 xRO TROD 00 10771 000 000 III? SSWRO 101IM 4 MOW MO •111al124 IImT 000 0T40l0YM1 a*MN1L.0M I1M01 r 7r 15r 111r HIV On it In I12W 1 IORMQ11 •n6 aalr t111 w.n1QM01OL1NOWD NUM 611J3•AMWMO 10 Ian 2601* IN Iw 110 />• 01I WI 1010a1 /n4aa111 Iw 4FM01M1I C MOMW b/ A 1Te*0M0arY PAW 661 1617It OW OW 111 WO Illf 64 W 11r1o1B1 •1166f01 ....w0w11e•a IA ON WOI L•05Mx N 1 W1 IL.0 MM et. If WN000l1Na1 1011123136M IM IR•0M040QYYoi 1000112616016 N 0 111 011 UMW OW I11.111101 1r 1015 • 0H41M6111NR1 /61631010W i !0 I O11®Il1 II01®Iw M0101ONICS= II 0 Sint 161r MO OW ssrw I1 001Yw1*11114 1r16II•wN wer0lra e1O {104p1m1 MO=IRL1I0l41Y•1lm1!ll�� 51iw 01r WE II w Ow IIMIMR 011Ia 11 Qn nu1{47FNNM1 hYMl011 MOWS JIf4YY1 N NM are 1SNM SW Om rill WI WO 0l141111� IMt 01MOM4JMr1 00Y1RIw44al0N MIa N OW MN 6fan On Iw WWI w*47YW llM{Mll 35116112112001 I601 0pS44431104l4 JO•S 4JY11400YR1 WOW 411 MIN 0w OW 11 11b WW R 1M1 MST 1116an01 M70T *4010R1113 wM1N111[011f1��1 11 M 1M 114E Me 911 Q•Q ON 00111 twr 1 • n 514149*0Sr SSItI$ILIANI WV a1100 1111 1J�II I{« MLf UPC M1lWY•YC 1aw 15N 11M31 I■ SO r lW{MOT Y724 II 10r1110110A 11• LpM11R4M1FTN 1W1I00BY T71 11r Ilry 1■ ON 11 4MU11wI n6a 1,16an0r 7n* 4101W01«Sr7Y14gI N001 IIQI 4A71 I}N OW IIT 712 NM4m0,rr14a 0,n1a222MYQ 7723 *5*WNW J.W(Fgi 012000A 06 in(SUT7I4eN0mt N TO MOM MAIN 2112E1 100m 517.0� WO 01M + oS IM r111312110 01 1112427 Otl1 y,14 1111/ 10/3 ,A▪ I100ItJ1 JAWS L00N10QMC61 1 WOO 6 WSW IN ON •1LaQM1ON01 W116aae1! 1>A 01•W.O011M{ 0Mw1N7A 101.w01I x 0 law 511 Mtl •w O1111n Tr roll l• MYYa0017M400 •,Oa1I1. Sal 4.0 Ifn1 532033 0(( ISOW f1N a1I51 • 4m 1N 1m MmJd0111.110001 Wn.7l1,m0 lllf3 10 On76AL MM0601 0.1260N NW OM 4 N7 1105) 5111E NM 000 Om 1110 WOW 0461 4R W 114WAOM1110WON 411*2214®11 1561 10n1104 C0o1w tw1106 CAMT10 WIW 0 0 1120 =II MY Ow IN 101 WM WI7110• 04 MMM*a0J01 111$n3101 1W11 106400600 1401110=1 I 0 11010 wr 1• IN ON Ma 70 WU b MW00RI110M01 111442221017 a 1011 $611L10W0`\ QR 41.041w140 4 0 11r 1r! 10• IN 4W 10 at M101JIp0pp0p111ir0tt{7a714000m« 00132221036pT 15(14 aaILYNp10(TM00 E I.OIM N MI 12040E S'EN rOM Bw Om 1W 4011E AY IOW MYIJDMSa0M104 01 i,Inii�11 11II5 .1l11* 0YOO1M11M n R I1r PAW Mtl •f N•WI 71r 0M1 OODM M00000{1m 1111a11/1 1.01 0141.1111206 1610200J00 41 0 tat Ma WY IN Om Tn 100 4001 10 W MMMOM00400 011162310 1= J{Ifl31C 4t 20010 2�0l10I116F6T4T0.*,oOM1�0RO�11 41 0 lM SOO nMT 4w IN MMyI AMOO OIM1RtlS tf W 114 N. *1MMY 1 0nf2a72Jat1R 15515I 716f I0IM11T Rl TMMt304701 Mt O0W10 4 Al 1 *70N 0416W 81 AN 1Y1 ..1m5 WNW 4Y W MMI00M AO MN wn*77�I N71 2Ra T0l418547 nWYW 1111M1r101WIr 4 R r7r AM a16V IN OW 11 7s wR 4•W MW100WI7I.001 0011622310.3 IYf D4JOAM4IJL*fa OOM1LOw11M00W JJ0IfM 1 R law f1 a1m IN •N Ia W ,r 1 W 00MM011/70M« Wt1Ia all IY• 010.00021114 pp 6JJDAOI D0W0•LIMYM JJ01lOI 1 R 1>♦ We PM IN IN 11 111 Ir r R MIf100R100M01 w2IIa1100 4.1 14 Li0M{J M.1M G 10*(TM00110IQA N 7110E .11W IYWO OW 000 11611 OM1 IN• ULM(4401tl4OM T111IIi1® 0w 440M14111116 Wt 10Y •II J4R1 W NMMY 4 I0CN b1 In040m M00WADS=COIWM4*a 1 Ialw ]0t• Ow 1m MISS WU W W VOMYIMI Maw MI ,V11 Ow 1N a1 a1 W 1wf4311O11N► r1 11r n1• Ow 1m QUO N1 w Il/N•WMI ]71 11110 MUM 11130111 It Iw 7 ON ON M 0N Ali W 1W M1574* MNW WHYS * p 401 NNW WrO01 M11lW7OON01 MUM,WM Ian wW UST]MMOM nitIII 01 11 vnIIMUM anlanrl at16an0 15 OS220 O®1 •W 1M14UMW KIWI l a010 0 110 WO mow 00 Iw WOn MO In064112WOW= SIM2 nwm 1715 YMOM0 611r1111 Mwr10114 4 101 4 1N1 0 1000 M@f MO 10 IN 1111 1I101 IYM 1 W RMl WOO WOW= vn6a0IOW 170 N40 elk =MO.=Al 0 711 101111 10111 10 *w MI r1111 RMl UV3164001 a,1{anwl li Iln 00160414101041 M TWO MU MN IN OW 10100 inn 1f+ ••M•4AT)1011000011 nnllRfn M1 Wy T4LI410T ngY){YYRM 11M11 NIN LW 1RIr ON Op WOOM1 PR=FAST OOADOM v1167141 Nil *1*01{C OYTM4 11000JI01100111 MO 10 aM• tie Iw 1•w Mr]11• 1110E W{T1ow« On*a0r1 IW JIr01•YN4IYIIIOIIYI 0*07 MW TM WWI 1aN 1w •M In11 I{f r I4M1 FJ01MN01 a111220100 WY 0*0 DANKO* *N4*@o/1a N 7I000 WOW 100 1w IN 0e= MA1 r R I4M1 WIT]OM I al1la0001 60c MM1401 M1 R11MJ6414II LIWI4 730 rb 7MT OW ON 751 OM1 0W Of R00IWT TM4MI an67}147Q3* RYYIV01i44W004 V.W 000E NU(4 Ow 0ro 0SM7 e11T aYA0J6710*W0 SINltfl*7 NW 740[0•ftl ON40w*COM4 MO WWI an i4 IN 6w M O WV NNW EAU Op4001 an6a011 1111 1WT 011Fu +OWD15nW FW Mr1 MM. IIFO• 1001w 04n OMr IIMIEFWTMo7ciw a111II0r1 tom If OWDIMI,1 WM10mf J1 Me OM atlw 1w {w r41 w/.OW RM/1 FAIT4m4M1 A16a0M1 MITI 141 EYf4W rOW30 LIUQ101411 1 Inn WWI 104111 Oro WI1W n1.1 UAW FAIT I04001 151142200033 10141 640364 =MR4«MMNO N 14401 4001 1.114 060 00011U 1061 10M IW4 0011026r4MMON 1511fa W0011 OM I10061110,011 L200II4.6106661301 0 M71 I01610 1151E IN IN 11011 1744MR IRON 24121.12601 vn*a•aw ill 1@N 114324E ROW0YL1100 JI500 M MI 85 MUM 10 1.IW 10 Illm•EWT IM100M atNa 0m11 1@Y OJMMTMTOYIWf001 00WDJxOWTMI 7A• VIII 1w7r 00 Im MI 111 IMf NM 111114AM.r111101 a1Na0WN 100n OI101Mr OM IOAAA 6WCfl lam V,W nW• On IS {}474 014E w Inm•EE01T.rx 01 atlla0rl I434 04004E N 7700 41 11Ea OW 00r- 614N ON 115W 0•A1117W1m14Oi1 71 nSli 0435 lOf 01fNM MTNO a11N 1{1 IMW Sf Ow 101r 6011 R In16l F207474 M a11{a0wa 16M JM4M06]YIIAIWf MI6 M*t•11111.16011 Mt Iwr ISM* 1W IN 1W In -MAW OUT n11M01 ISOM WW1 1a1 sFRFN1N4Ia 11 72030 WO 010 IN ON MI WWI 0211 711w NNW600I•NMM alma Ewa id n •Arn.OMU poll �11 MI NI OW •tl 111E OW bw In00110M.MIO1 7514 ftQM l5P1 546 row 1.0N4?7I*S 1TWM 7:MO :y4 01411 OW OM IYOM MAN 710 I. RIM*I4r4nn01J 01rttJ WOW Min 04lr11MW1 MI/0M0/!M 4 100 17021 114441 IN WI WWII ON On W NM OAT 471U4 a W= 1517la1lwf W. 1160TRT inn 0 a MAin MOW HMO TAW 1W6 N SO O.III 11M w MAUI440=AMY7NIIN4M0 WM 641610 ITNISIM *Y II TM I71 Iw WI MIT 7N11 •w W On w W1 NNW AMAMI 1 W4 116a WI MU 15 MWS0 4 00114/I JYOf N IT•N IMM000 0 711 MO 1132771 OW ON 071 MN Ow P.M MIT.AINNM0 rin6a0011 WW2 JO40N00EM N W 0.1m 77 1761.R ON OW 51W 11,4 •W IMJI 14 LWI O4MIM1 K11*l1M®17 10 N M T6001MM 1*tlnw1000N01 a0W enw 0011 OW POI WWI O*M.0w WM11rx101 ri1ma•1 4 MOO 11 OWO11 COM. 7 4M4O0 ?WO 1YW WA. 1w INTn WIWI VJY • 102064W74MNM v116a11d tow 1=1,M AM it174T4 6010112W211011 N 70w Mr 116n *01 400 Itn 5Tn 17111 7a NM 7330OM40R a011 1r00 Mn 06004IM06rQ 751 1M 1557II 10 00 I0T MN OM TV MM•FWr•MN00 7} 1771l51001 2Ai J4FF01141 406NISS 11M0 YVY 70004 0r OW MT M1A0 IMO 710 W 00Mi FWT0A14Yi1 1fr107J1101M mmos 116•WNW WA 2410610 4 7x10 MN 144411 000 IS 1171 !r 04111C NNW OMION 751 a 11 wV 0A1J .M 01Y00=MOW . 714E nos mss 1. Om IN MN IN M 1MY74*7ONM01 1110a al«W 54{3P1 sTT4W 0.1r104DKeg 4 MI 11W 11• Ow IN 11n w11 4w NY W 1014E 1WTIN Al= 7,5,14ll mg /66 5A 42 n+ 511.11 J.A x p.noce 57W or. EN nN Wr OM 730 R=IWT1MWO. TtN.1��1 m���tl 1N0 04I KiWMn7 IYi11IE1T1N38WI1T1 N 7T000 d610e 1WN Ow Or rry ,I•s OS'711m IP1AFWi0MJ171.N RIK7771764 mu 1662026IJ600127M 010I04Y04041111y 10061 w 7711E MW 1115• 000 40 nT We 004 70 RMW FWMIMM4M 751162110331 men 0.61606610=IM= 0613J0061110114 4I 4 7NI0 Wb IOW 0m SW 1M 1071 OM77wW MAR EAST1M1m1 an{aa10ID IN15 n.N4001.UN WO01 I(74Wt1 4 1101E WWI WOf 0w SW 101 7100 OM OW MAR FWT•MN*N 311*72 UMW win 05,244T4TM R4 1140{4.4C1C.04M 714n WW IWn Om Om M. ♦016 O7T 1N M0/•101r1MAMA nlaNba 2NN 14,M III OMw/IOS WIMrW NW 410 27741J ON MA-WI TiW.WE=IT TWM14MT IF44MW all In J>M01014140QLLI0 In10 510 17Mw OW 0m 11n M1 •6r 1 W 8543 Tom MAN nnl a M WM J04LWN JAWS0 AMMCIY V= Man 451E I7nN Ow Ow IM MN UN NO* •0/6 MI OM YON 11N It NUM min •44Yf1110 Mt 161 NW=I650601 4 7740E 151 ILOM Iw Ow 1171 I0b 011 w MMl0WT4n10m0 2511Sa11M 164 05=DOW 000051I1I4f I Am WWI MU OW OW MN till. mf l NM•FWr0M 60W 611120114111 CI11 I7M 19/7PI*I$7{Mwslmol.ln*.Pi0k1Mr1Mm)dlerlrle nrlw07l4n*cc4Me agp een ill«m11Wn.E•Mnom*wll71 liD«m2ionlweg�1MrN1*IQ . JJWIhe 17b4sMr u,N rlq Oe 4MPDT6ANe t«1Fry Mu c1411e0 p VN 7MQ1gerK101.41 o1161g0101«ODI 103004 n«otullq c4npnq««AYItr1g tt!sld/I«n111Wn. /76 6 peaty e7S • SIN Mb le 200 1401.0 C* ►nl l� ICoMI w n�--�-�TI PI toil 1 •.a 171022101121 ...-.0 N9.017„0115 1ao • 0M oa tall OfAi REounoominON 0711111101111 y 04.0 fOSW0.121 Ia0 1 0M Oa f0a15 ON/ AMIG01ElmO 011an1111 y 00.LA reGi nSM 12511*045 i Ma IOW 1 QM ea 171a ant SiI`l naaa w 1.0 0007.06441114 0•10.691110 nw MOO M•a On 1 S 70201 1104 0.0 xo R0A1 Ws4a7Mxonr 'o'W^"""1'•°"A9A as mincer mt..an 11• 2 1rM1010 WOx L2 c WHOM 74a rae n)a ea 19r0 M. LAEa2101. a114II00631 v .1�I�•Otl1 I 8410/ LUFRCS10100x anen naa aYm wre •a 1ma r4 -4 Y07 0000 1.11021.1 500YJfC14S 7� Moll 1Yv 0a 1R5 WISE OY4 IONYT107RW0 a111R21an S .4650.2L1 201.10 11 IT 7 r0424 4100I0R410 151a Moll I61 Oa 101 444 L.0722*4404 MIla 7]n JMI�� .O.l10•04P ma0l0U.. .y6W10.*4 Fl1F 470a Joan .d4 0a 'l00a LUFY:F710 ACC. all617250a6 740 1 i.FIP..CU1 inn.WO.. p0Yi0WYAlrW teat/0,0MM a0L6Rn all -a 10EU6440A0 I IS4/5 000 SS m V. �101 e0000 17151 0Y01 LOlYI10.0011 a INRn0a1 •t0 Rn7.40AS1 7302711SLFwYA 66605011sa1 7a00 A51a ,01M 0a 17132 M. 0Wx4N OY, anons 00. IR"204 1 \1..111 6c L1Ym3ex 11a 50.0 f11111 0a MP 01M c44E0.577M"3A6 25114.E f 4Q 0RMr1•^OCIR lC42A9 IO4M84LL 7b400 �S.W IIM4 0a M74 Olrlf ni11n110M N✓.h15 D,0.011 G0.1003 NOM•nX 0.22.1r)MCC. IOWRPD\10E G11.000 MOD WO In14 4a 9nY 1010 n1012 1110 ' A 101MM0U 004MIa ElIOWYAO MOD 61R00 I1J1Y •a Io>am iMl RWEFµi 1fN•ooN n111II110150 •27 1 ..M'101• Ax1fMIJ O' IMO 41N0 01174 On 11.0 dlw M.Off MUM 25116221101Y o 00WXJJA00A0 R00 R110 11VM •a 67Y0 ,7/a 0.0M[Ulf TN IOW 7 1107111014 I. 500n0U J4ES6fllEM R1006SOM N4FWI71NLL014 /51162211010 N. .nM^N11 J6l1O1 S1 0000 71100 14011E Oa 1541E 01A0 UST y.D.. 16107.2044601.0Yt uN1F 1Ya MOO IY155 0a 11412 nil EMSE 15 11117111. pM 1730/I 74 FX 100a 7J54 IOJM Oa IMMO 1ata1 0Mf[E4Sr T1M4Ar nn0II11 WY N OM.. DOMCON7WW E.0670M 7On 7311RRn00 W W MD.. ..57004400 Inn J540 IvRM 1a 101 40 1n1 AMmnawMP O48IJ1a13eM 11A110 15W ,4n 10 ea Ir,4x 0740 4EUgf ON RAW n,ls J7111114I • �/2 n At 0701h1E4t 0a 1.4/4 vvl N.4UM.M4{h 2S116R II4.1 •O 044uh R4RM150. IO.o RISW 101N 93M0 0.04 M7601140 FNMA 41141211/Y U OW 3a1Y ON 46000 4Ma 140N MITT0Rml0 ZS Oy S10S•'..0 JO IN.401 l SaFxlOx W0/4135.L60.1o206E101 1400 WM 734Y 0a 9h4 W4N117100 11 n111221Lo10 a 10 "1U A62016 nr C"YF055*0545 VYO ,� Aa0 4'.MI 6600 101101 •.17 Morn.FIST Tm4P0 n1NR n01o1 0M M.O. C 34V46\J1INRa 2.01400420 FN 1 MO 00 M 00 103101 0046 4Mf1M1/l1.R010 15116771/4/4 • ••W .V.O• a6Jf.Of0 •16011V},E04 11000 .•140 I4YM 0a O7I5. pl4fLRr110400 T01221101. �90'NU J0• M.6 t*WE 0100 144.12 Sa O1 OW 1MOE MP T1M•007 n11an1101M 441 00"M4 NIMJ Y.lO la .M01 Ls I0.roofROYENI 16E01f•faM 100a nn0 IIY)? Oa An SW 1� 0101 1.104 Inv n11Ya n0rn7On • 6.0.'!0U 141.E [0 11R00 0a Y 0Ir�00 41401UST7M4a 151111/0 02 IFMOM•N0Y0 n M) 104 00M'•24 OWE0.YM4.YA /OMR T2F0 1113M O 1 0'W 0M6EUST J1MR0U1 n111a11.4 0P.n N01 717400J*00.5010 45C '7llY3O4M 11Oa 13n0 1114 0a 471'1 1100 EWRERSTnN•ID0 25111221144 4 000nn5u 425474 0.4.16M 110a •.00 14420 Oa Nn39 1YI1 1N4E40afrm10a 4104n114110 7 x.MaU FI 247'/2aAC JPW4A1 nAxotm6al 100* Rla ISYa 0a 9745 a0a OODST T111Ya 4501n41 O111 .M ..M'On• .Ay.,407 Y00$ J7l140M60 JOW.T01 1n0 31.770 Ma i Ono .61. 1 RMa F05TT1"JMW 23 116 12 11 0112 ▪ •.Mwu4 •72MOl11"0P 10�00 .H00 17476 000 1 ' rR001 IMf J1M40N 006420 3111 q J,0 wet 4JRBPaM Inn M00 4 Oa 70/772 400 OMWEMit111100a 00177110n,1 n 1.1 011 WWYOJ1W00 11000 7E3a ,102256 CO Oa 1MOO ILY • 110w41i1.0 0I1MIQW n11FR 11 Rt4 1 t4BF1E 11140614M74fa0 160a JIx0 111a0 Oa 14.0 0201 711118W rc wxc4u MMo r,Ml mYyf4rTMRoa nn6.'7 • 1.04aU �/400/42( Y00 44V0 14.0/ as ni1S11117/ 1 •"1 4.Y'.L1 nRORr1gW 1YE0 1Y40 14.0wi lO0 l:2N RIrOt 1g60l MSi J111R0007 nlra11411 pWEE411400011 '�h4 o;/,EYO•4MFR IWO1*4 WO 150a t.R ,1 0.000 4 Oy9E KM1704A0 n111R110 5 r7 0E4n04 N JNNWS 7062111.1 007J4CARMNM6 4040 61500 752)0 Oa f 0 I1I4MU 110111104.104 67 rMRE 10ANWWDfAMS 4D ,.00 IAMO 114n as la1N milt WrOfMl nlf•OM nironil 006 • 4.M•A7• SW10a04lRRE pOaMJ6DOr11YN11E PMLR[UJrfM00W 25101 n 0414 It.0.77112 I. n1a 11M 91 ea nm1 pMOW.EMT iM10a I5116 22 11 1111 • . •�y..•1U 024 NM5141 1010a 011,0 0.00 AW 110700 4661:4401 M.6212110410M n4N7211 elm 0.1112.401 OM'IIfE SnQ14 100a .01 111310 7a 94105 MSIEGO 40/011 25n6n11441 ,072 11010' U 4161041rt0 .A0 MOO 1a0Y Oa 133103 97M V6•AEfr71M404 01107t7t11004 .. 7-64 •1 4 010010CUN14 14. Alan 07000 007 117004 i1MU 1MYE7•Sr 0N0A01 2je.i110v.4 0 744...- 4 CLO\C7rf11W10i MC.C1010117045 OElMRADr , a 1W0 1.475 oMOff4171MWM tf000wm 1Y00 711a 11a 4t . 0700 4711 01.UST 404 01 n110RiiMY .7 :-.0*4R )r7772/00 54lfM. MC.32$41 MY91 110e 0R3 Ra 19Ya 91A5 ..OWEl4STr1N10GN n116a114:O • .•f .0Y104U 04fn4UD MOP.R$,11l4444t5ACE C 0 1* 4M0 MO 0. 000 r400 6410 p*,tMST M M. 75n*nii0ln .•1 Iw00U 00NR4410 a 414041 7 E0147 a01112 C W.V0 inn 0100 111261 a 12011 .1jA7 n710n .1 prM4•MS• /4441/000 C1HEr ;fi00Y44 C44C10SEr 19000 MO ,4530 MY ixna 1R4 m6RFMTMN0Y0 1n5 114 41 11 0121 U 7\44.A01 022l0 NM WrEM 1.105 *el #2606 UST r1NRANI 151162211R1n IJOW FICO 15T24 0a 00ME EMTJ104 ALA .*14 h4 RL04610 �wRDCOJD 10a0 700a 14144 is 00.1.2M1T0M400N n11Rn114177 7 .10Y100U CREDO lFa1Y0JREREA01.2. IWO )eat tall• a 171Y5 011a OM.0.2220LY010 n116n t0M it 0001rr00i SYd46041 174a 440E n37)1 0a 1141 o44 POW431TNY41 n1441211 Mn MMn4U OD.07.0404LrsrtP ;1. M0R lulu as '000 •117 FUST702t03 261147111017E 04MA1• 07060O"OM05 lM1Mlt0a3* ONa00 100E 3* 7,714 04 11174E 0lS7 nlf5Rn4n 'h 16 •06J h7/IM 1ACM7l4SARESWMiPi 170E 63300 11141 Oa 11/a nn/ M.FMi rM407 nil4n Oea1 pW00M'N .9111NAM20 On a ,nr SO16 YUWMSET 45100710ea1 WO .0M100U .0U4f0 00U0504T 10 '•.'1 MOM.0nom21 M nY10Mi 4.0 5 10 ar 1100 0YI5w*r 721167E MOM • 7.77 100E-1R 0i707M1 i0F 03011 CO 4Y1a I 1 4U,4h15T 24114:70164 71R 4rs74IVvrl n407UI5 Cli p00 0 Nlr 311r n146a OA0J �1.•3R •1f.T40011 Irifn NV 1CO lea 9 WM 511U R01SY45T 235 5116R 12 0aY "'4 C 6 011 11 MEYI.ISCO 7`00I1 17A0 m577 0a M45 01/00 0UNM54 3541an I2 aU 1y .R306R 0n 1:Oa 1rva 0YF5Mxar • .N 000oon64 76042101a J•N6WW PD4016110•YLa4W1 25a0 970E nV0 6I070 VS0 n4S151M3f ISM n17001 ti ..1144wrr 44C Sin. 7WSA1 4LN45\GMaE00M 15A0 R1Y0 I4M4 OM 15114:11714i1 N.n4hw04 Ont.001 wYWFNi CORCI SCWM MO 011 41064 0a 71555 03n5 E,W3w11T 3104R1700r '.y 07r74h 29 h4C.u4M 11 4500E a110 13IOM 0a 357NR12a57 • •n Or714hwOY nr44M•i1 1.00p SOa 1)atl 1a r000 anf MY7f WF4 a11RRRaM •C1 001E-0rn 004144INf 00 MOO C. 04764 In I7ANM1Fxm4a Y114nnat .0•• . 001410*5E DR ;671.7060 woo N .w 1 YY 0a 100NM1 DI mIorll ..YM..410 R R04714 St C441011a R40V•40a4Y 0100 0140 :430al 4a0 10YJ 04r l4NE41)17704Ox aiionno0e14 411 04040K CP 0w.i010l5l UYPL Y4;1W1W6S44Ml UMW N 24M W. 1.0M 0a 011a 0M4 10x7M1EM100M. 06110IIn WM a1 JMYSrII " nA10 iRMO 17YY Ia IM100 inn 10AN M1Fx m411W 011NRna0 •060 RMLM0YR00 0.1 NMNxOM•W 0 ,007Y441104 M .090. 0n11x0'0MM 067YF A71NP 6 raME1l2 N MO t020 nM0 •00 1071E .1 .170.1xm40N 70110n a1 Wr MW.00F rw ue1Yll 6M1WMJrU[ N MO 714f1 Oa .. .00 •00111ornr. al RnJiFff O..r1.0.110201.OMEF eFEA M .V 0 NOfxQFxm10011 0111077If MO Nl g[[R 171E 19! 0 71171E 0a 11011 MN .04M1Ex14Yd a176nn0Yl •MM morn C4 04.14E IEa1rVa Mla'J WF 11 2�M 0 151)17 IC NMx MSx2M RAW anRnnlal PE.75M 5 14a S IUJY da Y170Rnar • .Op 11110,4041111 014010 4E40140MCIWYW 0.7.114..06 E 116WFM 0. 17Yn MY 111M{ Nn7 M.M1214.000N 1 1. .00 40049rq•0 4601N4FW1 N 0 40ANM1FN mRoa7 .16021. 046E SJa0 25a71 la 13010 0.0 a'1 w M.17.4 0. lOp 02462 00 y0EE 0lCMA4t•1FartI Mr. a)31 W. NMN704 MM. nRa11 MO xo 48112441N rW WME01000.62.YW 770a 070E 1rn71 Ma 07515e an I0FNQ4 m400f aN4nnr0 CIMIP E4Y5RCfP O4aE1 SRCE1 10a 0 Mr a 44E i11 M0006.1 004C.7 010 OD 47 n) 4 11111.M.4/0 80aw3411'.1W 111N0 /:'0 1N2F111'•7N Y60.4.M 06110II O WM1 ..i•1f7u.Y01A e0J��14•�aC OONUN NIlE 0J00WSOMRIO ,uO • 4Y Oa tYla 0.40E 10Ax M1Ex a4lRnxa •44. 40Y.0MM VD • f414 ea 72*40 Mat MVNM1SM 134YCUr 42107/705 4.01Y.f•4 CN.I4CRrV 10100e 0E ,01OF4M1fx 4M,,,n M.O M wWROgM 77 0 rrlr Ba M200161M TT M y41Y0..NM Al Iw0.36[JOM410S rfWDl6C010E JOW0F5 11 nI10 VW nM0 Y .4iihC4(M K11R i1:37dY .4W4.0M O4M01CM11F :1700 MOO 74011E 101 064O0 An N00 MN 011111172 n 010 +0174.0f I. 2/0411P 5404/ 0001E 4CAA4MOI. 2700 0 111131 0a 43101 o02 104Ni(15 Y114Rn44 •M1 04440E r• 030Y0600a 6CCIlI0aP0 OAMIOSICIA•CIlIlW10 4 MOO • 1141E In �4M1N1 al16 R7EY1 700 •n1 OM 14Ol1.14 OYOw0m CM 11 3f0 0 114 0a 10p4xn20 an622n010 M 00.11(.7'.RM O4w014455 •A 140 0 144 0ce 12501 NOV YL4SMf11 n411a7771$14 14w'.MNr4 Nf MSCTYM43C1r(... i44f•'V.MZ.,"r MO 6501nif0E11 W1n1 71045w1/M•41IM. 7750E Or74 ON •1 46YNrwrlO *LIRRM Yr4RJ05240 0 N 41O 1n5a DVS ea 116W 0W11 7.66.... 15110 Rn A01 1 .MO ...MO VP rg16r416A7474001 11 N 4 16aY M9411 la nAa WVra111II11aa ' • 1 .1xW:17r C01 1111111111111,/44'4Jr\e[1 0a01.364p.J.. N .Ma tim Y4N ea 1a5 f55T 11 .Mns55a 4111n11,110 •MS 1.1r,1 0 a24 1...aa11J MWAEAO " " ii i "04M YEW 1'47 nl! 5U4W41 35114 R1i71R4 I • pp R14'114iN0wA NA7)04ffdd Ym54 194 01RS„511 nnla Naw `P wwM"MICR id A0.4. 1.111C X•31 130 `15TS 0a M111aa06 ,p1 WMirelt•"MOM 6sE0E0 404Yrv4t N 310E WM 011 Y la ISM 1 Y051010104II 0111 1450* , A IFM0IJr74 0MOOR 4Mn4 •01.263 1014 AMA MI II fain 0f711 1 Ya4T1412111n 121Naa0M0 •1♦ Ix.4WIM7M 1610/704J51YFR5E RMYPI1J 611774 FinE x 2.31 a 4714 rn45119s1 1 1a41ff®12111a ^0 .1r14111r 01 1615t/ri0x IU10Ml54RP. " • Y '0/Er7�IE 40(P115 S16s1a S1a1c11.1n/.pMllsh4 041 12 every aeon iD 241ii 40 Maw«ero W1es nR 2203E ie• Av1!y P019rr•ft,4 rld fN fE5pA16,D0 id a.N b54 cw5e0 by 1M frgEgerlce yM , • ,•,, ,, 592 I DIN PRAIRIE-SINGLE FAMILY 203 „,. .sn• i PIA I., ',IT f`TI Lt, ,116,91., It it, IhR I IS]PITO SIT PT, (Wile I.SIT,fl.) /ON., ,,,, ,p“,0,0?? ,,T 2 sT ,KA 0 1T04 goo r,' WOG",T',1 dM0,SOT, 0:P I,000 S•,C0 000 0,0,.)1??TO•T.,•f,, so,,,I u,V /tl 4.S S IITS 400 Ill'11,91 II 04VS PPS 1 $0 6105 OTP "I 900 S.S167 000 ; '1,- .. • • • 1 i, r f i -IV i',...;:•., ..c, ...,: . • • . ..,.,,,' .1.;! - 1, .0,, .;••1 ,„:', -s t..-, 7,-.,....--7.-A.,.-- ',...• • .111.1..111:1: i:',' ./,':,,,‘?,,,,t,„iitv. ,'` ',''-1-s 1 i,'''''''C ' t.•:1 .4 ...{ . .. ............... 1 ;; *'4' ". . .e..,T....• TT T.10.0,11.01M• ),•\11.1 111•1111 TA. . •' i "T."'T"3,.'0 0•Tr"'2•Ti•04.0$0_0•T".....0 ...c.pin/I,Is.......1.111.6.41•OUV64.1•04,01001 T14 ,1•••,•••••D04.411.1 5.1.I....116 4.111.1.4r.to,Au... ..,..,....”Nu,,1.,.....,t,........,•,..,,,.. ',A.'....".,:.....0 .•SW,..L_V-1. • ,.,.. s .. .... . .A, .. . ......,.. (-'• --'12111. 77--..- - i. . ,„ . ...„ .,„,,„..,..,,,,,,,,,,,, - .4,41444 p.144 pi 4,44,141.......44s 4.14044,111*.§.40.4.4 4 ,,,,,................,....,,.....,......t.,..... • tirk.---• a At. k . .1.L.X.t.,.1.....1,144.4%,0017..11.., 6.6.0.4,06.Aron•ii.00ro...."•••TT,PlT.Org.YG 4.4.11.6 ..6.16, 1.6.1..1,1.114 00,00.011., 6.4,114.1144.140044 Mel.510.1.11.4 I D V..*10O• t., li ,,.,.0T•Ty.rwp•.1.1 VANDOw.......o,YIN\V•• A 1,1.1•11.I vst w I.An ryl•4.4rSenss 044,s•T,TT•LT pp 4 0,41,I. -.4 S •, , 0,, . ..,. . .4.4 C.a.otmo..611164 WON 1._ CALM CON44(11.1,15.IN 1 r.14.4.1000.1.1...41...4.4.11,1/4in11.6-,146..,4141 Tr..T.G",T.two.Typo.TT,Tr. T•T41.,ry.,,TTR....,T..,4 T.. .11,STSP.41.4 11.11 4.1 t 4,441...,S....41414,14.61,,S411./S,11.1},, "Tro•,•". I i I"Trx 46 E. •.6.',,.6,44,4,.44.44'.4'4.,6',.. N. yt-wo........•1.4.......,AA.•pr.,.‘,1 IOU ' If.'1' SO 2$, &SUM /111100 /0104-:- IBA,4/84 2,0 I STY MT CONY I.114410 0 C,,4'•4 C6,VTS 0S0 6.111 ol• I If I .•00$$,, 000 ',491 1200 A*PS 0 50 5805 OIP 214 k00i-iii0.000 ' ',' '••• • .,„ . :51). ,•a 7... . . ' I ....'. ' . ' 1, . - ilk , ‘ , y.,,.,..,,. i --.,,,....1, .. .. ...•f,;.•• ' -• -.....c......-.......7-.. 'r '• 4L.E. '''1',....ir,c-r,440....-,fr..."''''..4''' ;«-t:;•----;.'.2i,:ii'..i..:,:a...-; ii!ll ..._ ' 0.166.6t601,..N .46 sanl ea I .4.10 ail ,....,...Iv,.1.1M•,..0.145(."',Yr...4 TT...I 0(T.nu. r r ot. r..•WA 144 .•TN Sy*, (00.1,01 A SiS• .15/61 '•''M.' .•46 11. .D.;'‘...'1 4'I.Mt l I,'II•i'IT'n•ii" T.*I 03,0.'PP I Ill UM ,42„/,,,LAL,ptql.1{,P la V..1/17.1111,CP10PI G.lt.1 G"".I O..,V 41 NUR 504 1 CONTI.44,01.4R1 IIN MO.•AIIM0.4 CaiN, ,r.$1.”t II 10.......C.4.1.1.1,..000S'OPT.0111••10l0011041 I..4......141.14.11......01.41.,f NMI,ta.41 It r hi..int •VITC 14,1. it rro.tr,WIraIlll.all 604.14.4 cal.-MGM...IS rOilv IN V. 11'.V...."'•';',ASIV...44,',.,r4.90001.•:L•41. • f.......__Mi119,..4,•51941.1001/110•PVATIOIDICOMT yew.etyma turf 4.w v406410.4,1.1 00 1111.120 112121.1,.N.A CI.090 n•0"VT VT 1.1.DS,.1.1 go?*IT,n 17 OOTI Ye•T COM ,TICI WI DM DPW t ,., t 4IVIIT V..CO. 4.4440.c.,k9c.OP4..0. '' "' '' '"L'4 '''. '"' i,......,SO4.1....$64.444,971. 04..11116 II V 4441.I.,I .31( 1414.1 FA CAS 1.41,14. 6,• V. 1'1:0.1Cf" 1.:1°.::::'.1 14 44 Veroa(111• 10 CON 00. •••••• "".••• ''•4 AT.'" T' "la"T 441 SMICS 4.44.1. MC N ni1.4.1.4 ^,•• I 4...1.4.0 6,...........6../ye, 4,04,66,4 04 '414 .t.Alt I•T •'SO SUM/WM•' 'SS Sr.SI MST t 1,1,_{122d .J111.3.0_1/2.9)...1/4!At_ .4 41.94401.•4.44 4.4.'4,4 6,...ONNTS16061.4,..1.16.1 IA• SA.1 II k,. •'.....4....,, FAA 4366..011.4 Of SON PC 14111. 01.4410.6(04. APT.11.66 ..,,,..„ 592-EDEN PRAIRIE-SINGLE FAMILY 1135 e 668U. :11):MP T u'5..T 51 Cu., .S169 900 1166805 4160 4 milk 1 01 ST.2 ST CONY t 1752 100 01 0190 15 OATS PIS 0 50 SOP 0.8 S189 900 5-1119.000 01,06/16 4 01.5 ITS 00 SO M10E01192.100 94192.100 4.,,.•'4, Si'.. - •f....!-',- t -At naik.It': SNP 111111111111: ,,-.,....._ . ,..... , ...] , . -... -1.st"-• 1 4 ,t.' • . :, -,t,:,. 2-4......,,,,,, UNDER CONSTRUCTION '.• :4 ,• . . . , . ?../ iti - r ',:i...,. r it),i• 1 ...-;.4.. ..f•t• 1 M I i • .,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,.,,,,,„ „, 1.‘,... T. .-,pops 7 8, e,t,`,lel G•1101.2 0 1:11 svr AVOW I-7 DA.AI 76 11 4,AA•C JD .71015 vs.. ,15/4, t.•,0 AA1 50071.5.I 070111.1.1013 1•70•0010011 .0. HA SW AA Slt '' 7.N. 1•US 0 WO 4 _ .. 70.4111.4 310S 1121 .t0 i/ I '32 30131.30 0 0 53 3.•All • l'.....91. 0045,,WO 170115 100.70 W000 110.20001 .A.:,T4IT6s;51.'ss...0. 4,co 54........s. .. 515 tWO 7,73,11•00112.150.1f 1.50 S 0•1•11.1010 5...710.;00.Mt....c11.18 ist-00 1 0.4.... ../.5001.1.1.111/205 0151.0 5.010111 CuS10.2 5,00.0 AD 00 1.00.•SCR11...OW. 1.1 50.1.0051 0.01111011.101.0.311A W.,AAP.,w03010 let0D 0.1 Fe.,01011000.5 1.055.1.1.111.W.W1.0 0.011 DAC. .e.el,:5;ct A4.0 pet 0.;0...pee oetA Q..A.,...,e .011101010.111.1110 104 LAW A00.0*DM/5 ...AN...5101.S•ACI MOWN t GaReCA ADA*05,52*00.5 L•GAO CP,A**11 Wet,DI WV 2.0.5001.0050IDD.0*0001011e1 07.e0 ....07/AD.+A AMS.A..L3 la 70,1.010C.t 1111110000 0/10100•10.0001•11.1 001.01... 55,CO .55,‘5550 5.5.05 0550655K,et AT)5.t,4,lt,•2.001.2._;.„,.i:5,A..:,C,0•01., T....P.7„,1,1;10..•51.05P.141,:„, 0111,000R 0 1111.31151.0000.11.25.00420 .v Arlit3 ;..1 IDA 0.1 *.510 0 1001. •',I'v.., A':iur 16 1•3 2 A.,173.7 CON CD 10•1140.11007.000111;.CAD. u,,,,1 ' ,t6,,1-1-F„•.,0.,,0,.71,70,,,S COM .,. , -`1`•77`•,7 2E72,71 554 sr G.r.',,77 '"'• • ....ass sl,.t if.1110511 0 WOOD 07 010 CO. 40 I1 .., .3,•1. te I ......,T. ...“0 . ,s. ---4. w•• '..7/33 15•1 t: .0.12,.45.0 pr.. u'.so, ..... /•.1,so pox se 50.on 16.1116 A.200 C03111110 1.1A 2100 Sf• U1D •521 10.11.31 WC 030 C0.031100 AV S./PO 210801 0611 S.61 2.'0 S TS 14116 1,01.1. t S159 900 064906 0116.3_3131 2.0..ST.2 ST CONY 16199900 - 01 .50 1.Oar S 115 3410 SO 62/2 OLP S 99 100 S-1110009 01 111(6. faITS ITS 0 SO 6274 Ot.5221100 $6151.500 , I s - - . • A L • . .. • ,/ • - ,..-'• 11 0 • ‘1.,.'-, -. ____.IP -.......... , .J*1, . • ' IL ":;-e'ilt,•.-.-- _ •'I MP r .• .. . . • • • EN 411L-r. -•1'. .-.1'°° '''• _ 1 - 04 0110001 A.,,,.0,...,,.. ,...3,, 1•,,,01.5,5,194,, Pi 1 1.,11,77,7,,, .0.,0 10•.04•.e.10.roon.115 C0....S.W WW0 0611 13 t r,vc.• lAus 05 0 157v5p ,•.0 IVA.!tut*C•101 r•.000 0.110 Welt F••••11 707 11S ac. oTos.ss J.A.c.ow 1 1:Pt 11/2 ,1•12.11211131 •3121 .F.1110 1 _b_KOT. . AA.75 Att.L.5010.AG SW+(7.01 0.10.A 50051•CI 0100 10,50/20 OF 0.0051 01.01A I. 0.*MAR 1011.105.071111 110.14070 tA 2 SS;Aw.A1 C 4.11..0.1.53/0311e,C.•C.11.4 011 .1051 2 01111 0 7511 0101 OF 01 70.017101,5110,11 0.23 3 2 Ss0.4•0.wev INvA 3 5V00050101.0.1-0 Al 00 GAA.)•M.1, 011•00.4 100 0/rit .41011 10 10103 Ain 24.141150 AS WIll ea D. 57000 00'510001351r=774911/17.01-T117111-M712110 C21 0.03,0 3,1 a 05 4 61,A11133.110 1770 FP* 5.1.01103.SPAC401.60.1.01 50.1000 SPICtAi 10 .5 011,..00/Ott.C111•61G 1111 00.011.003 03•At rov000 D./0*WU A CIDAP POACG 10S w1.4110 000 1160•2010.1.-•• 1 .111R to.At_1a,Ati111 FLOOR.$17.11111•9,92.001017 71530 011..1150.*0.05 1311 1 050 GD1CG ,:.•511.0 ,A01111003 311.0•014.1. L 0•01.00 t5t it 3.00 IAVD•0001•01.00C1.7•At t 001 .3021300 GO Ds 06 21.1.3 7.01,.. A...0D GA.A33 011.15 5•.5.55 01Ct051 I 55•0 t.1.21•75 1 ...., ...„,,,15:17 Will 1,11,1,1010p.3.1 AA Mew.,tvt,....0.1•10.,7.1•171.•..7.0.173. L 700A •eG,717,7,137,12.CO. 101.Dv• 00.0 4 At 50 r 00 r.0031.3,110 001m111 01 11rot L•11 17•1•2/S it 10141,,2 .00 t1005C.C•101%, ,, , ,•IP1-21011•1 1 6 tt,• 00 *Au,D. . 55 1,t11A2 21 1 two 11.0 1 A Olt 1:1.511000 ..t .1 DettIll 3 2 11316 0 e rA GA5,20%5320.1 ,St . t,3 7303 03.w.55.6 H.,v03 01.•O.,. 0 A 30,tp 1:1400 1,..1 tw [ON 10 5 06 .2.04 .t.1•Ct JR.2 11112 p r•.000 Ors C. Y0 412 TS.,0,6 3.w 0310 tiArtt.e,10111•;.ett 0.05 0.Ver.. 732403 317.3,•10.6 50.5.5'00051 It 1. 11 It ;00 21. 113,7 i1.0•7 7 *101 2ter v '0. .•t 74.1 i•. DS. pi.,0,20 v•••;t.0.43 210.1LOWG w 1,,Mee ;ll.yr.Te se..ITtits ..5....ea r 0 es............ss..... Ts . ::-5..1,1 tA 343 5.9,...'5.34+011070.,.0530 ...4.15511 . .5.11. ..110.1•11 •7071110.0, .01 0.5.3307A 101 IPF.13 AA ARIA tO5 At:0 04 5141 .' ' e----)I. .1 Sr k 07 A Au 230 70,3•DA 111 11 2142124 A.0010 t 10111 r 1.15 •/et .v s.1 Is ',.. A.015,00051100 .43/1 0 11• SA 115 -714 Co....611.MILLI, s9f.0.431500 AG;412 7,54 RI.A1.113010 5615 ble•113-6100 .1 1151201 :66801 10.1:B..'i Sy.1ST CONY t S;59.900_4 166801 ABR..:II 2 0,1 STY 2 ST COMY i S199 000 01 22 90 65 04v 5 YTS 0 50 S17/0111$209 509',..S-6190,000 01,16,90 IS OAYS IsTS-0 SO 6855 00.3199 COO S-8111,000 _ ...---- • -, • . 111111F-Lr'-' / %. 311 . , , . -X' ,,, it. .. ,„ "..\1 :1 ; . - . ii 1 ' , • •. • • . - ., T',..310001. •••A 7.53111 /1 t 0,6/ 51 001 00... •SO D 11.15A.00 le ,.s,....Yet. B.O.; go t0111 0011.0.1 " v 001040. 1510 '•AA S4021 t•A I 11.500.01.111 MM. 10.SO ••01.11 asap MI DOOM 7.,O.CelINITS WrialE .W. ',711.0 Att0 .7 01 ,f11 :00 WW1 10010 re•4 007.0101113 SDI DIU..8.11 0107 01. •10•70,/11.•'3 A.•0 .2-7 0'/SD 7 35 1112 .0 311111./.. .11 32 AGSFOR t911 Atl •D.1 030*.e.miCaolPTIP .(.0.,tan 1,As.tr....,AAA:,13 317.0.5.. D..170.1 10 1P.70...2 70 10141.11R 001101.01 •301101 NW.03.0 C.7010 MAWS,SI 01.1 10 1.47 Ph 76POI 1.1.1110.05%.11.I-05011003D 31.0* •33*GA(01 VA.0 CIR.0170 77211.50.•ttpi 07. 0.0..r.w.....T.-.msg....005.0..AiD1 C2.10•• 8.16114.006 101111.MO 0.0.0111.01011/1111.00c..1 .01101..1 W17 OAR 7111100.114C .A.031A 7*AD..5171...10100117.0.05001 v.1-1010.12.101/1114.17111111A0111111V000.1.1011. 7.1010.410110..11 AI 0.0.1A7 37(17.541.1f.,...x....w..s...Waft 011051.. .10 ta....1100.6CPPG a OPT I sf CUTP101.1011.1000 •.4.1S129 KM.0Oc.910.11111.110....1.41.CIAPC Ill 1115 ST PO TO MCI.011.0.111 W.P1 :I, ..,0s,.1.01.111011.:5c1e171 .,. .9_12.4_M_41•61,11_02121.710T ... 110.147.47.-...1-.18,1-ik• - cAPITp s'. ,w.f ,.y„.„,.„„j„,„•,.,Op L ww„,,,,,,7S,,i0cww,w, ,TO,06.1422......,• w CCP ww, ••1110111PaS sl 1.2 M.P....SOFAS CIPINK 115111.* s 10,21.•1 A 7111513,; sIt 5 ...vs c.o.% " ,4 ,2-2.•r. ....2 oTt r PC Ti_s_....0.1 •...0.111400...t..120S.210 Per1.20•000.0.0. ',..''''T •!T.4.'S I-;4 s• G•5 0,S.3000 ..''0 r6 • u. 4411 20 'Isis •ss .r.SO WS • ••00.1.101 NOM ...11-11A1 1.110.1001 0•"T•'.-/,..5•••.000 7.• COD ..5 ay.. 0 012 • OM] 0 WOOD RI .21 .0 ... „,c,,,......,...... [ ;0•01,I 051.1,; , r GA 5111 :. N. 0 1000 0 I 0 SO pr. NO F• 0.1 veil..105 2,,2101,1'.2 AL% 1 .110 • .... --•.. '-y y,,.,41..) I,p,,s 5.00.30 /0023 NI Ai .1 V W/2111 NI SOP117 100 1131223 ..s 0 7007 13••3 0*** GP• t,1 75 •7011 wttt.12•P.P.. 11, sas .1•6• .2_"..._..'". 55'. .s.-1Yr.,,, ...•.21 023 01.12•PAPP 41.0 UN(1..41312.1 ..........2 APPLICATION FORH 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW RFCO APR 2 PID# 24-116-22-43-0036 Appeal# . AppraiserEEZ Date Recd. 1991 (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: G4\.' v4 Work: Name: -: PO!k Address of Property: `1. fl?, A=.\.">> January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $\7-1ur,cn Terms ot Purchase: Date property acquired: 7.7"0... .c,--7') Purchase price: $ -)n Additions and alterations since purchase: ^.7-uN Cost of additions and alterations: \r,Na ,:n • Is property listed tor sale? If yes, at what price $ (attach copy ot listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ • What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): Ste.^ • Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior vcar values: Land Bui131na Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 55000 129000 184000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 55000 129000 184000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 36700 123200 159900 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 8 / 9/ 88 Appraiser: Earl Zent Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 9/ / 78 CRV $ 24900 WD Lot sale --/_/_ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained v APR 2 1991 Eden Prairie Board of Review April 1, 1991 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 ATTN: Earl Zent The purpose of this evaluation is to appeal the 1991 market value on my home at 9303 Talus Circle. The home has 2,475 square feet and has been valued at $184,000. The following are two story colonial style homes located in "Amsden Hills" in the Preserve: 1991 Address Total Sq. Ft. Market Value 9480 Risewood Circle 2137 138,300 9455 Leaftop Circle 2163 136,100 9495 Leaftop Circle 1995 131,500 9445 Aspen Circle 2163 137,300 9502 Garrison Way 2004 141,100 9661 Clark Circle 2004 123,200 AVERAGE 2077 134,583 Although my home is 16% larger than the average home on the above comparison, my 1991 market value is over 26% larger. This 10% difference represents a dollar difference of $24,000.00. Information for this comparison was provided by the Eden Prairie Assessors Office. Based on this comparison, I request that the 1991 market value on my home be lowered to a figure more equitable and more consistent with my neighborhood. Sincerely, John & Kelly Davis 9303 Talus Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55347 941-6065 APPLICATION FORII 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW I47) / 1114R2b vex, PID# 25-116-22-41-003q Appeal# (p Appraise rDean J. Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: Name: ///��'10ekt-ZL' Pe_C,•Z41A5kt Work: .474G `. Address of Property: 9 '73 IJ:�LNnp� 6.% Met L rce January 2, 1991 valuation as it ap ears on the notice:Yr( t Terms of Purchase: cztt JJ $ (3214CD Date property acquired: I' Additions and alterations sincepurchase: k C a tC!:pri :, $ � Q L4 LC:�O H:.--�1Sz��� Cost of additions and alterations: 3) II J O Is property listed for sale? 4'o If yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ I 2.cYtC0 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): ,,ar.,_a` , 9 4 •. Ce • -Lill,_ •C4 11: Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Jan. 2, 1990 3 0- 97400 132 0D Property Class Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 29900 Jan 2, 1988 29000 84708 114500 Res. Homestead Jan.t Ins 9ction: 9 25 89 82000 111000 Res. Homestead p / / Appraiser:Dean Jacobes Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 11/ 1 /88 CRY S 126000 ]n 12St wn GS/_/1 CRV S 12290n w0 Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained . • �111�2f n i n 2 7 I, — 2 z_ — ti 1— CYO s A , �.vQ SLI (JL"tr; YII.�ErCl�f p� (Repo AAK 78'73 Beil,ttoYti/ L,t, Cr44 tpi /ak�C arr�a�SF�c 1324C0 se-03fI( fey- t127, COO sti it4' 3<ct,ii12�1 1100 .Ft �ce pet,- c ti 210("' fetf L 2)C^0 f.f L . � L cc(-ttettt cver ktt e<t�,� \/c s Ye 5 ye 5 ((G- r) \/c'5 (ttC Seri tt<ltryce 1 ;] to etc-let/ae�164,0 ,-.16e CAL.�t, C aLtl.c i•Lct,- - 2.K7et,-5Z E1Leto ttl 10(4 rt., Rel: 4;;Er crl(S, APPLICATION FORH 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW RECO qpR PID* 07-116-22 42 0040 Appeal* / Appraiser DRJ Date Recd? 19s1 (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 937-9254 Works 5i9-14nn Name: Gerald and Rose Ann Jensen Address of Property: 8024 Evener Way._Eden Prairie, MN 55346 January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S 139,700 Terms of Purchase: an yeax pnnvnnrinnal loan at 9_R75, boyar paying L_peinr Date property acquired: 8-17-91 Purchase price: S 139.140 Additions and alterations since purchases NONE Cost of additions and alterations: N/A Is property listed for sale? Nn If yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ 130.000 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): Took a look at the market value and purchase price of 20 homes in our development and they were all assessed at as average of about 92% of purchase price and our property besides one other home was assessed over 100%. Consideration of the railroad truck in our backyard is not a positive factor rather it is a nuisance and even those homes without the railroad track in their Yard were assessed lower. (SEE ATTT4CRHD cUPPORTINC INFORMATION) �, NOTE: We will not be able to attend tt/v -e„,,, the hearing but appreciate your fair S ignatu of Owner p. Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 6700 6700 Land Jan. 2, 1989 6700 6700 Land Jan. 2, 1988 6500 6500 Farm Last Inspection: 1/ 2 /91 Appraiser: Dean Jacobs Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments IL/ /_2Q CRV S 139140 9.875% WD _ --/_/_ $ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained F7 1', • S.Cvi gym✓ sA' 6t' � 5+rtti/SkL p�� PriZC - 1 -- 7- `i2- i2.1{ 325- 1I5-90Q -y2 z- S _ it l s s5 roo 700 90E Y-712 - St-/i z 7 - 7-y2_27 /5%637- -t5-13oo %YW 6-w zlZ500 7-yz-z1( /16 IN _toosoo �G s_. , j-9_v _ 1,32z -- 3-yZ�-51 _i L1 5-do /00 soo _87, 32z 7 1.25y20 /2.100 -7S1-3 _71Q-_ Z1174V vz-3` ---- 17o770 _ _iszto/ -- -7l. % -_J041 z/zz 4.6 7-yz 31, 10k 1010,/00 9?t_ t-9v 5_4h3yG 7-qz-37 10311/P OQ __L y,__10 5 E/ ,t,L 7-V2-- 3 S /0/coo 7o. G. �3U sL//_3ZZ 7-`2---Lib 1 -137I 0 '31Z00— 1W.O S9o--2/zZzc - 7-y Z-9 I 113 64,6 10q SLl-Lz 33 7_ 2-/90 jc co )1( Zo( _/. 1-9° 2 /.24 7-,-(2. ``I ,S zo !y37�o -_9f 2-0 Z/zz 7 7- yL-/lo---- /63 szo 1/7700 ` . 9-?o Z/z_z - - ?- 107 cCO lz-v 5-20 SL/132Z 7-y2-di _l SZo.__%szdao 4,3 2-10 217397 7- y2- Z /K46o Lz[ov 417,3 Y z/z.zy-y- -- 7-`IZ-_7fo lit 300 176000 57.I 740_— z_37 .- _51.9 — -- - - 91. S - U2.5" -6"-/61 3 --_;dam APPLICATION FORA 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW RECD MAR 2 9 1991 PID# 21-116-22-22-0024Appeal# n Appraiser Barb Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 937—I,�ivq Work: Name: ,ri5 1'UhL_„1_, Address of Property: i i ii& (? �A U.�, January 2, 1991 valua on as it appears on the notice: $ 129600 _ Terms ot Purchase: Date property acquired: �C Purchase price: $ Additions and alterations wince purchase: Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed tor sale? It yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ /741 00 Wvalue? It are your reasons ach u documentationn upporting the a ove Stated value? (Please attach supporting information): 1 I.�irr� � ayel4`/. — S-,y-0 41/... yr S •rsN� �aely� t: C Tv dr P e Signa u.,re o Owner , Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes ot review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior yea:. values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 27100 102500 129600 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 28900 109100 138000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 28000 113400 146400 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: /J/8 Appraiser: Lorna Lisell Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 8/86 - Porch Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments / / $ /_/— S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained APPLICATION FORII 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW Q dfCD MAR 2 g 1991 PIDt116-116-22-43-0037 Appeal* / Appraiser B. Cook Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: `.3?'2-4. 3 C /1 r J ,> Work: Name: ')i/4A.tr_-Y /7 i/ 6),Z6Fc/1F-/v /7 1�0i:A Address of Property: (-'(,0 9 Gu,4c ,ii,' 'v S l/9^/E January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ 400 Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: Purchase price: S Additions and alterations since purchase: Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed for sale? It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): i%!: ntq/:r<eL• vr/-cc w,s /`? ocr — t.-,i`/ /-/ / ,_/ i °i: v /= /{ <. ,•hr/'l %f-t' . 4Le'/? i:c•,v /_ f',F7 w/,/_-,a , ��/?3 /C'c y L•'!n5 :r ay. . .• .4.c_ !jF L ..• . 1)%./L'I= 7-, Signature of Owuei Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 Jan. 2, 1989 Jan. 2, 1988 Last Inspection: _/_/_ Appraiser: Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments / /-- S / /— S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained APPLICATION FOR11 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW �7 BECO APR 1 1991 PID#2-116-22-12-0028 Appeal# /v Appraisers. Cook Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: -/ Work: =3f/- ,R6,0 G Name: ,t.'_(,'Pt 7,4ref lC le_/1(rt:._ (th-I-11vO Address of Property: 13600 13C 1-/Le/_ 1I_4/V January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ /55 7('/^ Terms ot Purchase: Date property acquired: `ic Purchase rice: $ / c Additions and alterationssince purchase: L)i-e Cost of additions and alterations, 4/0200 Is property listed tor sale? /V7 It yes, at what price S • (attach copy ot listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ /r /BGC What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Plea a attaSh supporting information): nl,P j4, 4,F_ 2ti/C l / 6C t n���"(1-k I•GC - /.5,?,(0 ,1() FZ_ Qan/ rl - t' T /rir1rYo k.6TUr'n/ nn/ ' O' i rWr-N_S fr.46 _6i,4r`f /4.4 I�<T- I-r4r �,e r'°r itin/h A-S hpy((1� �L / 0 rip-i'-/-V A i 3-c�!" �t=y0.{c/�iC' C 4A/r_ Lar1lt ,- 7/'/0E- • 4/,`;0,,r /j(y lI Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the • City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) • Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 40 118800 152800 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 32000 108000 140000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 4200 Land Last Inspection: 9/8 /89 Appraiser: Barb Cook Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 6/90 - Deck Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments IQ/ZQ/ 88 CRV S 151414 9.625% WD . --/—/_ S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained : APPLICATION FORit 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW &Ca MAR PID# 04-116-22-23-0039 Appeal!! /1 AppraiserBarb C. Date Recd. �5199, (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home:935-9O 2 3 t Work: Name: Le ird- d-e Address of Property: t;5'3 S 3)4 January 2, 1991 valuation as it appeard on the notice: /$ )poi 7 o 0 Terms or Purchase: Date property acquired: /9 6 j- Purchase price: $ as, •a Additions and alterations since purchase: /Je,/? I`.,ee[Jay Cost of additions and alterations: 3 ed.!) Is property listed for sale? ) ,; It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ K oo0 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stat4d value? (Please attach supporting information)r ze.1 et,b GaY��Sd /leer ✓St7ui/1:n• (/f Sr✓r�wlra�JQl"�'�`jsr�e�'R: ., _ y, , o �•. rr Y 4; -d T`Q /1✓i. fiz/y_)/e.J e0u.lievf eIlt/ V.‘'7' 15' y Jr,'✓ j�dv off/ S,d'c ,,. l e{a•J9y log a.d Irwf}iL _ Ynn� 'e' Sl./i'.. 7I0 es 1`9 -rr=tarr r . Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 29500 61200 90700 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 29000 60000 89000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 30000 60800 90800 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 10/8 /87 Appraiser: Barb Cook Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments / / $ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained x i 1 RETAKE START oF The images appearing between this point and the End of Retake target are true, accurate, and complete copies of records that previously were not filmed or were filmed incorrectly. i I APPLICATION PORN 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW ECU APR 1 1991 PID#2-116-22-12-0028 Appeal# /V AppraiserB. Cook Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: �"/3_ Work, " -(o3/F0 Name:/34:L017. -1'Ar/4Y ,C-l_/}(l� -AL -I&.& -,'7'440 Address of Property, 13600 /q6-t ,14/24i L/ AAE January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S /5: "7i"C Terms of Purchase,Date property acquired, .. 7�) 4/Purchase price: $ 5� //`f Additions and alterations purchase: L =a Cost of additions and alterations:l /,:200 Is property listed for sale? /1/C) It yes, at what price $ • (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ j5 ,C CC What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated v-lue? (Plea-e attag,h supporting informat4on): i, ' 14. i--1I-MMTY� ' I .41111MilliflaINMPIffr �'' _ 'di4C Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: land Building Total Property class Jan. 2, 1990 34000 118800 152800 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 32000 108000 140000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 4200 4200 Land Last Inspection: 9/8 /89 Appraiser: Barb Cook Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 6/90 - Deck Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 1Qi3Q/_e$ CRV $ 151414 9.625% WD --/ / $ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review, 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained . 1 U CLi,16t6 Leg PeolCiery T /I57� PG0,1S Wi k gt,'/ D/A/6 f L,C/n i T 1,41,aE P19 Nor //vi cei.AS.E , 1/464)) TNi 5 preor'Fzry iCi - rA)c Dr ,4s A 30c- 4/ Foie.. /l�j 2 . 7-/fi5e. ,ExA/a�PcF_5 A, F,eorn .trnr�?_rr NE/&r-46oeAsat0 END OF RETAKE APPLICATION FORE 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW ipMA 5 199/ PID# 04-116-22-23-0039 Appeal# Ii AppraiserBarb C. Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home:9'3S1-96,V 3 r7 Work: Name: Leo-► Zrd Kt. d. K t Address of Property: ,45-36 FIB P feaee_ icI 5 3yb January 2, 1991 valuation as it appear on the notice: /-S 9tr/ 700 Terms or Purchase: Date property acquired: /9 hS Purchase price: S .23j Jo a Additions and alterations since purchase: /ter/l, at,y vet ed iy Cost of additions and alterations: 1,eod Is property listed tor sale? It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S trKi o"d What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated • value? (Please attach supporting information)rdor//JtrirA/(�;.14+ 4 7 (f,G ,;;, s d Irin ar� �r l r.✓4 b 4 ilia.1 yO �IS Ars�ilxve it , Y 5,.-. o 7, ", `7- A. A (fit /rs• ,0 y Oyu Drys uJi/ f-!a iLc t P�d JY-y-- •' ," Y`y$ ps �1 5•A,� vvad Ya it in) c 2'9 -ry,4.P y . 0 Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in • preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Buil3ina Total Prupe ty Class Jan. 2, 19900 61200 9070 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 29000 60000 89000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 30000 60800 90800 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 10/8 /87 Appraiser: Barb Cook Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments / /-- S / /— S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . • 3) Assessor's value sustained APPLICATION FORII 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW n RRC�APR 8 PID#16-116-22 33 0010 Appeal# /(/'-' Appraiser BC Date Recd. 1991 (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: I /2 , ) Work: 3J may/ Name: �6,-74/A //. 14//✓CleVS° ,✓ ,I 7 Address of Property: c{SUU � •�b Cj[„•-ie, L/: F ,J'� pi-. SS?q / January 2, 1991 valuation as it ap ars on"the notice: $252,uuu Terms of Purchase: /'Y1.,. Date property acquired: ,(/,v Purchase price: $2 70/00 u Additions and alterations since purchase: L.,c_..- /r el Cost of additions and alterations: /Y//;p� Is property listed for sale? /✓g If yes, at what price $ • (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $.7J Z 000 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): L.o'f (i'./i.YS t.�, d h tr-+e ✓.AP3 ,'„ film .e<ec 1'7 P 4 3 44yw CI rlic f!•rs,e fA - e, „.7 a,f q .s.r J •" Arft / Si O 1,,,i1 i A.' [,.:/',C_ / 7,5 4 f (_!l.t,-.,.r/.... ,w / /.+f ,.-, d4 Lz c!�:"li fC/U 1 d. / r.1. U ..•(` y y. w i /! S 4•, .. CI,. jl t<-n e J , Sign-"' � 3-10"'q( - Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 19900 145700 223200 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 77500 145700 223200 Res. Hampstead . Jan. 2, 1988 75000 141000 216000 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: _/$_/-91) Appraiser:Barb Conk Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments j / 87 CRV S 270000 8.5% WD --/ / S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained . APPLICATION FOR!! 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW r�EC�D APR 1 1 1991 PID# 02-116-22 12 0024 Appeal# /3 Appraiser BC Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: q'1/-3/3 Lou / Work: `S17 -fc't3 1-0l-1 Name : Ise 7/ T a/e 5C•ht T r � Address of Property: ia5`/ 7/C+c4 )( January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ /24r.3c)a Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: 3j” Purchase price: $ :''ly. Y 14 Additions and alterations since purchase: Cost ot additions and alterations: Derr._ Is property listed tor sale? tND If yes, at what price $ —(attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above s ated value? (Please attach supporting information): -A" /of did /2 - in uz/-e_ e p •bt,r FMV i lyel l/1cR'QJe li gre#ct urlm6Fr d1 /rani,,)1 Pe<,d&Ile he Ilse Arne' ('irz+,10n i� of value . l r�r c /rhprc venie IN- tuu s -to netd n decx of Aix d nievett Jam+ /i lc(hbrrs Cut s has „Y 4 eve„ 4-hOta9i, 4het have e&at+i �}h� cat-We hducf .•— Mc'' L1C ur it Ye Q p 1 fo 1 cL lc e o 1/id c tict.:�� : rra4h No ` refs Signature ot Owner & view• Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected tor purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 55000 122000 177000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 55000 122000 177000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 44000 44000 Land Last Inspection: 10/5 / 90 Appraiser:Barb Cook Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 7/1990 - Deck Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 3 /11/ 88 CRV $ 198923 7.875% WD --/_/_ $ Board of Review Action: i) Reterred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained APPLICATION FOR)! 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW ET APR 1 1991 PID#c•a c'P Appeal# /9 Appraiser u,4;re, Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home:CO4.1-2'Ni/ � Work: 65l- 113 j Name: fi'l tc 'ta<� i l Ka�G,�r r•' • 17a.✓t mi( Address of Property: (Dill,- 'Fc,116,ct:k January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S 180800 Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: Ihr-:.l Purchase p ice: .S ,�C'f Additions and alterations since purchase: LAW&✓ •�� 0Cc•� Cost of additions and alterations: .1•.2.oC( Is property listed for sale? /110 It yes, at what price S • (attach copy of listing agreement) L/ Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S 12{.Cce What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): 7A l)€ rce r� s tek - (r- fu3i2,1 `�4s I,,slr<4 (;.,- I re,:. tF BrrS7oc c..,d , Ti)r, r Th1 (.-(•rrF ( ii� t.Iih,LLK i2c d 5'c/d fc,-3il'1/OcC) �icri zF ��.r•.: '—- n•• )•e•, i;'f er! cc.lit,. ISe ter t (tvd r .4 1- I c`�u../i� ,•±,e-et e S -4" c,ee,y h: i, r�F�e pe#s.it 41e;F nF /'l.a ch'i,r .NPs u1 fi,r t'lr��t•t„ d have • h, h of ct r0.tic) Signatur.A of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is • helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 55000 130100 185100 RCS fir,, •,M� Jan. 2, 1989 48000 30000 78000 kes. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 43000 43000 Land Last Inspection: 10 / 2/ 90 Appraiser: Barb Cook Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments • 9 /15/ 87 CRV S 203084 10.5% WD / / S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained • • APPLICATION FORM 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW la: i t� a t991 PID# 17-116-22 21 0017 Appeal* J5 Appraiser CC Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home:93142 600 �\C1-1AEL -PAS work:Lf36 tfl�- Name: -� Address of Property: / l8c ems(-, i�PI January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S Z'ZZ-, 4/00 Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: Purchase price: S Additions and alterations since purchase: Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed for sale? NO It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) qq Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: SAGS OOf) What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above seated value? (Please attach supporting information): SEE3./ m9cttb� 2-'" • gnature f Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 48900 162100 211000 Res. Homestead Jar:. 2, 1989 48000 159000 207000 Rec Hnmc'ctpad Jan. 2, 1988 45000 108500 153500 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 3 /22/_91 Appraiser:)orna I isel l Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 10/90 - Porch Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 1 /28/ 88 CRV S 219400 9% WO / /— Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : • 3) Assessor's value sustained March 28, 1991 Lorna Lisell City Assessor 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Property I.D. 17-116-22-21-0017 Michael & Kristin Pan (owners) 7982 Island Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 The referenced property is located in the Timber Lakes addition at Mitchell Lake in Western Eden Prairie. The property has a 1991 market value established at $222,900.00. The owner's estimate a market value as of January 2, 1991 of $205,000 which is supported by the following information: 'All of the five (5) comparables listed are in the same square foot and/or room size layout. °A11 except 7951 are lakeshore property. °All comparables have lot sizes larger than the referenced property. °All comparables sold for $200,000.00 or less. COMPARABLES 7906 Island Road - 4 Bedroom, 2 story walkout *7924 Island Road - 4 Bedroom, 2 story walkout 7936 Island Road - 4 Bedroom, 2 story walkout 7950 Island Road - 4 Bedroom, Multi-level 7951 Island Road - 4 Bedroom, Multi-level *7924 Island Road sold and closed last month at $196,000.00. There are currently four (4) other homes listed on Island Road with selling prices of $169,000 to $199,000. We respectfully request that you consider this re-evaluation to $205,000.00. I will contact you by Friday, March 29, 1991 in the event that an application for review needs to be filed by April 1, 1991. f : / y ]l: Pan Home: 937-8800 Work: 936-2402 1 AFYLiCATION FUklt 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW Era ama g to Pip* 15-116-22 33 0015 Appeal* 46 Appraiser LL Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 9314 EE' /:Y)U Work: Name: /'/'S/�:>!/H /--, N� Address of Property: <'/0/' moG./9/17 !-N O �( Pon,Q/�, (y'M. :0-1K) January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ Terms of Purchase: C',7N771/1-c j Date property acquired: Purchase price: $ G %d/) Additions and alterations since purchase: ��� 04 Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed for sale? //(-) It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) G a Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): �!i/1_C//h,' C& F;(-/ i' /JF ( /7 64"Odu fir /9//(AF T i r/ ,T/> 'mot I 000,0 SiOaii i4. of-OiTe r Yl Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 16000 56600 72600 RPs. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 16000 56600 72600 RPs. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 16000 56600 72600 RPs Hnmestead Last Inspection: 7/10/90 Appraiser:l,orna Lisell Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments lei 1 /90 CRV $ 68000 10.375% WD HUD Sale • /2T/77 CRV S 81500 10% WD Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for reviews 2) Assessor's value adjusted to • 3) Assessor's value sustained 3 APPLICATION FORM •� 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW ICI APR i 199Y • • PID, 17-116-22 24 0015 Appeal* /7 Appraiser LL Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 3 -5�U Work: 3 Name: RAYM ONO 14 , R 1c--E- Address of Property: XoiO JL ifr:d ,f'z,-a.4 January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears o the notice: $ oo1l5'On Terms of Purchase, HOUSE, FIPtiSHED UP - S 7 Date property acquired:LC:I 1 // 14- Pur ha,se price, S 5411000 Additions and alterations since purchase: NO(V E. Cost of additions and alterations: -8- Is property listed for sale? (./n It yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): " E 2 41111WASIWITATIMICWinirfr. o.T!y. PRrc.f , - . ., 00 3o60O0 , "J R Y TFIE 12,o j6`70 in1 c(Z�AS'r Z V✓r-�2 ;-w � rot-. No(^f. rn/ EP rnl�P-EA540 g� l:066�// Please Note: This form requests priva 6r confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 76500 255000 331500 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 75000 250000 325000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 75000 250000 325000 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 10/ 01/90 Appraiser: Lorna Lise11 Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 08/87 Basement Finish Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 5 / 8 / 84 CRU S 81000 ND Lot only --/ / S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained . APPLICATION FORA 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW(/ REC'D APR 2 1991 P1D# 17-116-22 13 0025 Appeal* �0 Appraiser 1-1- Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home:V .277_a-erz, work:p/6-)W-soon Name: pc N P L P M. /Yb'i- 7-r , ,12.4 770,v Address ot Property: s0(/ / /^a8641-hi c Die iEmdN PIeA-/,c,67 77 f,, January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S SPY: 7e3. Terms of Purchase: 4bte.f r+n/r6ecc Date property acquired: S-/S-e7 Purchase price: $ rZf 7' Additions and alterations since purchase: N/l- Cost of additions and alterations: N/n- Is property listed for sale? A/O It yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $77x47/. What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): 1Nbt4 iYFxr D16R-4.76.2 GLosno en/ f-/r-91 cif L► PR1c,c .Pkcr; •(sr: .n-»ecNsP r.oes',114 STAHr) TH1s L' fl$ // /Ye, LFrs 7"/ c wPNRA:sa0 "4p41/4Arr A'' OF ys:gri 1(tPZF.rei reel sire*.-# .a„ goth'cso Fetve.�YalEtx,. ignature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission ot this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 )R200 619fll 901110 Roe Nnn_Hnmaetpad Jan. 2, 1989 18200 61900 80100 RPs. Non-Hume ad Jan. 2, 1988 18000 61100 79100 RPs Nnn-Hnmpctead Last Inspection: _/L/_qc) Appraiser:)nrna I icell Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: 11/86 - Deck Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 3_/2.3/$1 CRV S 82000 9% Wn 3-/_/Li (RV S 64199 W0 • Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to . 3) Assessor's value sustained : • fo,n,Ilpplove0 UMU NU.AMU-OW/U. 7164 NU Uniform Settlement .,O'4pulr0AC6 Statement • nV2" . ?gnomon!51•r•min, tp._i loan_.0—.—.—._._—Y_(� EIIA 2 1rnl3A 3.I[.IConvtnp M ro onal Vnau,•d I.U Re 6 UCen an,Ml Mfund --- . w,b -_ m - -_-_.-_ 2loan number aAlo„pop•Nampo..ca.mambo---,_ 1085 I 716440 ,egeT Ima roan 1•i.;;;;ed 1e{ova M •M N aelu•I aaldunn•nr SOM.Moon bold Id and by700 atMemnl•pang•n 0ow0.)lama m r0 In0-13 C 17• nrot and attn.xt Morino ppm pm sAuwn Mn SorIMO,m.,lon pupal"and ant nog Included In the,ol•ta. —_---_ Iannand•ddra n.lbe-trona, E.Norn.and•ddr•e,al tells, F.Flynt and•ddrts•ollander • .41415 R. SEECER DONALD N. PA7@I NOR WEST MUNTCAUE, INC. . YVETTE A. PA?' 15U25 (:LAZIER AVENUE ills CREENRRIAR ROAD 1201 1l>.•1SO 3.<I J�r:tlf SA-•,)osrpti.I",J (45U1 SUITE 201 VNETOIIKA, NN 55434 , APPLE VALLEY MN 551246300 • ...opal/loc.aon ------II.lU11•,n•nl.p•n1 I.ae1Nem.M dolt ;2 TIMBER LAKE DRIVE WALSH TITLE 03/18/41 • •N PRAIRIE , MN 55347 612/835-3320 - DISBURSEMENT ' VKEPIN COUNTY, MN __VIlt.r._9 U_0.!2.1_ P 3 BLOCK 5 pl.c•Ma•n4m.ot NEEElt LAKES TUWNIIONES 4820 W.77T11 STREET 0220 EDI NA MN 55435 otary el Oononbi benaLeuon _.. A.infantry of beila,l II•macllon IUnOn.,Amount 0u.front oenewer . . 100.Creme Amount Out re seller _ -cppme.c.sees at:_ -09.000_00•d,.Contract Wet pdc----._ -119000.0.0 're.lonelp,ope,W _ �t36 402.Pon00Alp,opt,ly ---_.._ mn,co nano„w..One 1,oq 7 .18 701 --- .. ' - .0,. Ad ju5Intonls/or Plants paid by Iler In ethane. Ad ualmenlm Pullen.paid b t1I•,In adr,net C!ryAewn Into,__-- In IOa CIIyAown Intl to _—___ ..___. _-,_ . Coan•Y m,n, .0 407 Ceunly Inns 10 nsvan,nnn m 106Asenementa to . ns_wcIAribN-MO 3/181373179I--- 43.n4:pp ASSOCIATION WES 3/io=i/3I191 -49:94. .10. _-.__'----_-- 412. I.Orr.,,meant doo bent boon,.., 87,452.12 ono.Gems amount due teeters 84,043.94 t.Anmwn.Pod nr O,In nabll Ol be...ea, 500.MtlUctlem In Amount Ow to belie, '_0apmd ortarots,money __loin_cm 501.Ern.dapeall(DNMeaucliena) a;, •hmc•pa1 on000n N now bods) --- 502.5•n1emenl charm ,.o le sells,(In. p) ,3V7.70 I Eeump Montli Olen,uMne,, -.-_. 501 Ea41m MM p . ,Ialttn tubt'eol ro i -- --- -- - --• 50..ra r,olmpnp•p!lnn FLEET 1YTCE _ 68,495.99 i-._..__---_- Sod Alton W second martinis roan .. t 50s uxn1H_ FeEe CIIICA 5_TITLP__...__.._,175..90. SOT. —....._. 1 500, I SOA ---_ Ad)utimenn for Moms wiped by elder eel...In..n4 for ntnn un_tills senor ' C„yMwn roves M 510 GNyAown,aan - lo__ _— - CO°^ryL'L^L1/I/91 e3/A9/91___.__-272.84_Sit Counyuns 1I1T1—Io 3�19��— n s,,rvin to 512..Attmvmnn 10 t - - - 511 NON 110MES'I'EAD MIYITION 199)-TAXES r" 1,784.�\ -_-- ILLASSCCIATIONJW61:_JIui:C16tL1991.___. ...h .. . 5t1 5a .non 1 - 5,7. --.__._- 518. — _ Sea. `-' '- - ft run,p•ld bynp,bormwa, 69,472.84 520.Keell.duoilon.mounidu•5•Mtr 77,350.63 d CIA Al 5•11lrmtn1 onmlr oenwn son.CnA Al i.Biun.ni iolrnm seta.. ' r b 11--nnroum due Huborrowerbwer 1bn 170) 87E452 12001.Chou mount dirt totett,dint 420) 84,043.94 7 e --e- ---- t '—----'171 sa im m na •n roM+a „o», eos.onto 77n1 E 69 4 2 a07.tna nduelro+n In•Geon.due atln,nos a70 ,3.. y ._ 7.Cash xk)t nam (_)To anon.. sox Cash X Ira U nem senor 17,979.ZB6,693.25 - .n_6,n li.ty„..Mora*, Clot,-SIMIPMm,Atml I- -SON h•A)1,1 h. • n,,,.se rlpt 1 N:. • JANUARY 2,1991 REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT VALUATION NOTICE jh CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE PROPERTY I.D. EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5534i 17-116-22-13-0025 TELEPHONE: 612 937-2262 fs",--Y•Iof" 17-116-22-13-0025 1991 MARKET VALUE 84,700 CLASSIFICATION 48 DONALD PATON 102 SOUTH 3RD ST. • ST. JOSEPH, MISS. 64501 PROPERTY TYPE RESIDENTIAL NON-HOMESTEAD The Eden Prairie Board of Review will meet Thursday, April 18.1991 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie to review the 1991 market values and classifications. If you intend to appeal, please call the Eden Prairie A ing Dept. at 937-7415 for an appointment and application form to be returned by April 1. For an appointment to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization, which meets .Tuna 17. 1991 . rail 44A-007A haenaa .Tuna 1A. 199t• • 1\ April 1, 1991 CITY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE--AT CITY HALL 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed the application form for the reduction of assessment on the property located in Eden Prairie, at 8061 Timberlake Drive. I would appreciate your letting me know about an adjustment: and/or if there is any other information you need from me. Sincerely, Donald N. Paton, CHA General Manager DNP/sr Enclosure ST.JOSEPH DOWNTOWN'CONFERENCE CENTER t02 South Third Street•St.Jouptt,MO Se501•sisa 4s000 1.229-Felix 8 Edmond Street Exit Hotieq inn St.Joss*0.wixown cw.r«iw cent. m OwrN.a 0p.rme M MNM Spme A.I c N APPLICATION FORA 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW AC.pMAR 2 PID# 05-116-22 14 0018 A /9 8 ion, ppealp Appraiser JS Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 9>'Y--PS.27 Work: 3•7P-2tS/ Name: ;17.fryto.vo € (-1"."S77.4-'e ' / Address of Property: t ccy TiA (�,ee/ January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S /4 y 90o Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: y—f7 Purchase price: S /YY.9/t Additions and alterations since purchase: /.to..T wirasoJ d6 nStr Df« /99A Cost of additions and alterations: ‘2,620 Is property listed for sale? A-90 If yes, at what price S .d/A (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $ /Ss000 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): SfF .4 ' 4'go J�f27FiP ,Avo Aorew rx&✓7-A7lo.J /7 I i ature of w(T� ner�Ei Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Totgl Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 42000 113000 155000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 40000 112000 152000_ Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1988 40000 112000 152000 Rec HOmPctPad Last Inspection: L/_L/9,Q Appraiser: John Sams Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments Q/ 2/86 CRV S 38500 Cash Lot only --/ /_ S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained !lEC'D MAR 2 8 1991 6559 Taiga Circle Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 March 28, 1991 Mr. John Sams Appraiser, Assessing Department City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Sams: We have received the market value tax report from the city of Eden Prairie which lists the market value of our home at $168,900. We question the valuation based upon the following: 1. The original cost of the property. Documentation is attached to support the reported cost of $143,915. This information was also furnished to your office in prior years and should be available as recorded with Hennepin County at the time of purchase. 2. The sales market analysis prepared by Edina Realty in May of 1989. Due to the current recession and housing surplus, sale prices have been on average stable in recent years. Considering that in most cases the list price is greater than the sale price, the Edina Realty analysis would indicate that the value is also extremely overstated. • 3. There is evidence thst the sales prices of homes in our immediate • area have fallen during the past few years. This is evident by the following examples extracted from the multiple sales report • that you provided to me on March 20, 1991. Property 1987/88* 1990 Increase/Decrease Parcel Sale Sale over years in % • 05-116-22-13-0044 $170,867 $174,600 2.0 % 05-116-22-14-0049 127,448 129,000 1.2 % • 05-116-22-41-0025 147,900 146,500 < .9>% 05-116-22-41-0015 153,700* 148,000 <3.7>% 05-116-22-/Y-0014 151,900 164,000 7.9 % (1) • (I) This last hone is on our block. Since the purchase Ln 1987, this homes basement has been finished off. Without this improvement, most likely the sale value in 1990 would have remained relatively flat. You can see that housing values have not increased as you indicated. In addition, it appears that the only home you applied any inflation factor was to ours. If the sales market has produced an increase in the valuation of our home, then it should have produced a like increase to the other homes in our neighborhood. This did not occur for the other homes as documented in #4 below. 4. There is also a disparity in the market value to constructed/(original) cost of homes when improvements are factored out. Property Parcel Cost Mkt Value Percent 05-116-22-14-0014 $151,900 $154,700 101.8 % (1) 05-116-22-14-0016 180,000 175,400 97.4 % 05-116-22-14-0017 183,500 170,300 92.8 % (2) 05-116-22-14-0018 143,915+2,500 168,900 115.3 % (3) 05-116-22-14-0019 147,000 163,200 111.0 % (4) 05-116-22-14-0020 155,500 154,100 99.1 % (1) t presume that the market value includes a finished basement which is not included within the cost figure above. This would reduce this to less than 100%. (2) I presume that the market value includes a large 3 level deck system which is not included within the cost figure above. This would reduce this percent. (3) The market value and cost includes a deck added during 1990. Please note the disparity in percentages since this was the only improvement other than window shutters to the home since purchasing. (4) I presume that the market: value includes a three season porch and a wrap around deck system which is not included within the cost figure above. 5. Per the revaluation Area Recap provided to me on March 20, 1991, it indicates the average growth 1991 vs 1990 as a 1.6 % increase. Large increases were indicated as a result of "improvements made to properties". The comment is not true in our case where the value increased $13,900 or 9.0% with only the addition of a deck. 6. Let's consider for a moment the $168,900 sales value which you stated we could sell our property for. Using a mean sales ratio of 93.1 as indicated on the Revaluation Area Recap and the ratio; applied to actual homes sold within our neighborhood, the market vacua should be $157,000 maximum. However, the sales value stated at $168,900 is pure+ speculation in lieu of #3 above. There absolutely is no way our home would sell even near that value. • 4 7 Many of our neighbor's homes have: a) large master bath suite with whirlpool tub; b) masonry fireplaces; c) brick fronts to the home; d) cathedral or raised ceilings; e) three season porches; f) finished basements; and g) six panel oak doors and skylights. Our home has none of these items. As mentioned to you, housing values can vary dramatically by the type of construction and amenities. One simply cannot take the highest home and compare our market value to it. 8. I also question the lot valuations within our immediate area. Our lot is $7,000-$10,000 greater than our neighbors who also have creek views and/or have large usable back yards. Our back yard is limited in size. 9. 1 am also concerned that the market values of the two parcels that appealed values in 1990 had the largest increases in value. Parcel $ 05-116-22-14-0012 had a $10,200 (7.4%) increase while ours (parcel U 05-116-22-14-0018)had a $13,900 (9.0%) increase. Based primarily on the above we respectfully request that the market value be adjusted downwards to a value of $155,000. Enclosed also find the application form for appealing the assessed value of our property. Please review the attached documentation and let us know if there is a change prior to the Eden Prairie Board of Review meeting scheduled for April 18, 1991.. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincer '7 • /17 Rya and R. Murray '4''1-./47 ///' Christine K. Murray Enc. U • RBCD MAR d 6 i991 6559 Taiga Circle Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 April 7, 1988 Mr. Earl E. Zent Appraiser, Assessing Department City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Zent: We have received the market value tax report from the city of Eden Prairie. We quest4nn the valuation based upon the following: 1. The actual cost of the land and home construction cost is much less than the valuation. 2. The valuation of our neighbors' homes that either have: a) masonry fireplaces, a deck, and a brick front; or b) large master bath with whirlpool tub and a brick front; are valued less than our home. Our home has neither of these items. 3. No finish work has been done in the basement. We respectfully request that the market value be adjusted downwards to a value of $144,000 based on the above and on the attached schedules. Please review the attached documentation and let us know of a valuation change in sufficient time for formal appeal process, if it is so required. If you need further documentation please call us at home (934-8527) or Ray at work (338-7851). Thankyou for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Raymond H. Murray awl kti L1110, Christine K. Murray • Raymone H. & Christine K. Murray Land & Home Construction Cost of 6559 Taiga Circle Schedule I Land ( B.T. Land Co.) $ 38,500 (2) Home ( Martin Schutrop Construction) 97,255 (1) Additions: Lighting 930 Dirt fill and grading 2,707 Painting, staining and wallpaper 1,605 Ceramic tile addition 148 Home design costs 320 Retaining wall 2,005 Sod 445 Total cost value $143,915 (3) (1) See settlement statement attached line J 105 - N.C. Bennett Lumber $27,114 line J 109 - Escrow 2,200 line J 1I1 - Martin Schutrop 60,441 Original contract downpayment - Martin Schutrop 7,500 $97,255 (2) See settlement statement attached line J 1I2 - 1st Bank Minneapolis (swing loan on land) $37,654 Less interest included in line J 112 ( 154) Original contract downpayment - B.T. Land Co. 1,000 $38,500 (3) Reconciliation of total cost value to IRS form 2119 for 1987. Form is attached. Tax return form 21I9 $148,500 Title insurance, abstracts, recordings and mortgage application ( 1,800) Attorney fees (primarily due to contractor failing to comply with contract) ( 1,950) Appliances (dishwasher and garage door opener) ( 530) Miscellaneous supplies and tools 305) Total cost value 3,9 law • '.C A48 No 29020285'E.0 t2318b1 JEPARIMENIOF HOUSING AND URBAN OEVELOPMENT B TYPE O F L 0 A N SETTLEMENT STATEMENT , 0... • 0.»,. • 0 xo.......• • • 0.a . 0 t.«...• • • .tat»o.•.• . Loan nu...* TT 28082 • .o•u••n«•c••a«o NOTE This form Is lurnlshed to give you a statement oI actual settlement costs.Amounts paid to end by the settlement agent ate shown.Items marked"(p.o.c.)"were paid outside the closing;they are shown heto lot inlotmational purposes and ate not Included In the totals. NAME OFBORROW: Raymond H. Murray and Christine K. Murray ADDRESS OF WARMER ,.Aut Jf:TELLER: Refinance 40DRESS OF SELLER: VAMEOFLENDER: Knutson Mortgage Corporation IOORESSOFLEMMA 7805 Telegraph Rd., Bloomington, Mn 55438 • PROPERTY 6559 Taiga Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 LOCATION: SETTLEMENT AGENT: FIRST SECURITY TITLE, INC. PLACE Of SETTLEMENT: 8009 34th Av. So. 01100, Minneapolis, MN 55420 • ETTLEMENTOATE: April 23, 1987 SUMMARY OF BORROWER'S TRANSACTION K. SUMMARY OF SELLER'S TRANSACTION a104 AM0UII QUE,Jo iaLuk.�,. Contract sales pace 401. Contract sates price Personal property 402. Personal property Settlement charges to borrower: 403. (kom tine 1400) 2,292.12 404. TIC Bennett 27,113.74 405. ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS PAID IT SERER IN ADVANCE; AIMS TWIN IS FOR ITEMS PAID IT SELLER IN ADVANCE: 06. Citynown(Axes 10 406. CitynOwn tans to 02. County ta a 1/1 to 7/1 55.39 407. County taxes to 08.Asseuments to E.P. 7 8.15 408. Assessments to 09. Escrow (Work) 2,200.00 409. 10. 410, It. Martin Schutrop 60,440.93 411. 12 (at ltpls 37.654.09 412. GROSS AMOUNT OUT FROM BORROWER: ► 119.814.42 420, GROSS AMOUNT OUE To SELLER: ► AMO NTS PAID BY OH IN BEHALF OF IORROWER: . '!- 9;' •tj'•+';d':. IOC REOUCTEOII$IN AMOUNT DUE 1O BEtUR:w"';1"•"V.0:"'?'a+::e•FIl'.;1 ' Deposit orearnesimoney 501 Excess deposit(seerostrucbons) Principal amount el new loan(s) 105,000.00 502. Settlement charges to seller(lint 1400) Existing loan(s)liken sub)et to 503 (wimp wants)liken sublet to 504. Payoll of first monoage loan 505. Payoll of second mortgage loan 506. 507. 50B. 509 ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS UNPAID BY SELLER: ADJUSTMENTS FOn ITEMS UNPAID SY SELLEII. t0 City town toes to 510 City/town taxes to 11. County taxes to 511. County taxes to 12 Assessments to 512 Assessments • w to 513. 14. 514. 15. 515. 6. 516 7. 517. 8 518 9 519 OTAL PAID IY4OR 520. TOTAL REDUCI,ONS ► IORROWER: 105,000.00 IN AMOUNT DUE SEIER: 'At BETTIEMENT FAWN/OAROW N:i•0+r; .«a'; A:.p;:,•:,;;,i.;r:800,CASHATBEI$EMENLT0ri$0M.BFLUB:v;A:::e?ii.+T;u',i8!161M;i4`I ;toss amount del Item borrower nine 120) 119,N 14.42 60t Gross amount due 10 Send'lint 420) ess amount paid byllot borrower One 110) ( 105,000.00) 602. Less total teducb0ns in amount due seller(tine 520) ( ASH t0 FROMI (a AO)BORROWER: 24,834.42 tap. CASH (0 10) 10 FROM) SELLER' us Ednan Is Obsolete ss.Tut an, xaN �'O\r MU tt8 D')13 RESPA. 4305252 • Sale or Exchange of Principal Residence OMB No_I Sib con ►See Instructions on beck. 11887 nrmeet nt the purvey.o.-alnerenue Bernal tot ►Attach to f orm 1040 for year of sale(see Instruction 8). AlMchnera Sequence No 22 Nanretstasnemuanf0 i40 r ten eeelarwewrrynembrr Do not Include expenses that you deduct as moving expenses. I a Dale former residence sold ► b Eider the face amount of any mortgage,note(tor example,second trust),or other linancial instrument on which you will receive periodic payments of principal or interest from this sale► 2 a 11 you bought or built a neww nesesrdence,enter dale you occupied it;otherwise enter"Nano_'►..444i1724..6987 Yes Na b Are any rooms in either residence rented out or used for business lot which a deduction is allowed? _•_ (II"Yes,"see inslruclrons.)_. 3 e Were you 55 or over on dale o1 sale? — b Was your spouse 55 or over on dale of sale?. _II you answered''No"to 3a and 3b,do not corupiete 3c through 31 and Part C Orrt lire pers0rt who Ainwererl"Yes"In 3n Or 31i own writ rise the properly sold as his or tier principal residence for a total o1 at least_years(except for short absences o11he 5•year period before the sale? d if you answered Mies"to 3c,do you elect to take the once in a('(clonc exclusion of the gain on the sale' _ e_AI time of sale.was the residence owned by: U you,_ _ U your spouse, U both of you? I Social security number of spouse,al pure of sale,it dillerenl boot number on form 1040 ► ' _ (Enter"None"iryou were not married al hole of sale. f r IaJ Computation ofGain rl Selling price of residence(Do not include personal Properly dents.) 4 _ 9.aocx _ '•Expense of Sale(Include sales commissions.advertising,legal,etc) 5 5 6o o0 I,Subtract fine 5 from lure 4.Ibis is the amount realized 6 _y,Z/ya __— Basis of residence sold 7 p , I Gain on sale(subtract line 7 Iron line 6),If zero or less.enter zero and do not complete the rest of lout Enter the gam prom this hoe on Schedule U,hue 3 or 10,•unless you bought another principal �0 ��� residence or checked"Yes"to 3d.Their continue with Ibis fom ii you haven't replaced your residence,do you plan to do so wilful:tire replacennerd period? U Yes i I No (If"Yes"see instruction 8.) U Age 55 or Over One Time Exclusion Complete this part only it you checked'yes"to 3(d)to elect the once Ina lifetime exclusion;otherwise,skip to Part Ill. 9 Enter Ile smaller al line 8 or f 125.000($62,500.it married tiling separate return) 9 10 Cam(subtract line 4 hoar line 8) II rein,tin riot complete rest ni lanai Enter the gain Irma this tine on Schedule U,lane IQ'unless you bought another principal residence.then continue with this fern 10 a Gain To Be Postponed and Adjusted Basis of New Residence Complete this part it you bought another principal residence 11 rising.rir expenses(see instructions for time limits) 11 17 Anirrsled sales price(subtract live II from hoe6) 12 �,7/yV_ I'Cost o1 new residence 13 /f/6,snip _ Gain taxable Hoos year(subtract line 13 plus Ire 9(it applicable)hour line 12).If result is zero or less, eater repo.Uo not enter more than hoe 8 or line 10(if applicable).Enter the gain horn this line on Schedule U,line 3 or 10' 14 —o - 15 Gann to be postponed(Subtract line 14 horn Inie 8.I iowever,it Pant ti applies,subhact line 14 prom line 10) 15- 16 Adjusted basis of new residence(subtract line 15 from line 13) 16 i 'Caution_It you Completed f one 6252 for the tesrdence in 1a,do not enter your taxable gain hoar f oar 2119 on Schedule U. _ •r Paperwork Neduerlon Act Notice,see beck of toter. ram 2119 tiSen • 1;5 COW 2b tyyl 6559 Taiga Circle Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 March 30, 1990 Mr. Earl E. Zent Appraiser, Assessing Department City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Zent: We have received the market value tax report from the city of Eden Prairie which lists the market value of our home at $159,600. We question the valuation based upon the following: 1. The original cost of the property. Documentation is attached to support the reported cost. This information was also furnished to you in April of 1988. 2. The sales market analysis prepared by Edina Realty in May of 1989. Considering that in most cases the list price is greater than the sale price, this analysis would indicate that the value is also overstated. 3. There is evidence that the sales prices of homes in our immediate area have fallen during the past year. This is evident by the recent sale of parcel #05-116-22 14 0014. This home was listed at $172,000 in 1989 and was taken off the market when the owner declined an employment transfer. This past month the home was relisted at approximately $165,000. 4. We also feel that the disparity between actual sales or constructed cost of homes to the market value is not equitable. Nor do the market values fall within the 90-100% range (for 1989 sales) which you indicated. The following are examples: Property 1988 1989 Mkt value Percent Parcel Sale Sale 1990 05-116-22-13-0080 $160,900 $ 141,400 78% 05-116-22-14-0008 127,000 110,600 87 05-116-22-14-0030 195,000 172,200 88 05-116-22-14-0033 163,900 144,300 88 05-116-22-13-0067 $160,000 146,900 93 05-116-22-14-0005 98,900 93.600 95 05-116-22-14-0027 178,000 167,400 94 05-116-22-14-0009 109,000 103,200 95 The market value to constructed coats are shown by two adjacent properties. Coat Mkt Value Percent 05-116-22-14-0017 183,500 160,300* 87 05-116-22-14-0018 143,915 159,600 111 *net deck 5. I also question the lot valuations within our immediate area. Based primarily on the above we respectfully request that the market value bu adjusted downwards to a value of $155.000. Enclosed also find the application form for appealing the assessed value of our property. Please review the attached documentation and let us know if there is a change prior to the Eden Prairie Board of Review meeting scheduled for April 19, 1990. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Raymond H. Murray Christine R. Murray Enc. APPLICATION FORM 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW r1 ee V APR PID# 05-116-22 14 0057 Appeal# �0 Appraiser JS Date Recd. 1 �99, (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home, \ Work, S�(��-t )S' Name, 1\r,1-rr1 l_ kc.�C Address of Property( /r/-(.1 ' ( )^/4-.,1,f January 2, 1991 val ation as.it appears on the notice: S!6c c Terms of Purchase: P13Ic, , ,<, Date property acquired: iyvy Purch hse price( S Additions and alterations since purchase(( Cost of additions'and alterations( Is property listed for sale? AJ, If yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S 11‘ 4c, What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): Ccy•, 3A.c. m<S n (ycc-, 2 /i-„ C.t'crci,rr\ I5S: e,-r-!)LS- 1b f ✓.'y t„>, Lid / t: Signature off Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: 14nd Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 35700 99000 134700 RPc Hnmectead Jan. 2, 1989 34000 94300 128300 RPc Hnmectaad Jan. 2, 1988 34000 1nRcnn 142500 RPc Hnmectead Last Inspection: 7 / 9 /90 Appraiser: John Sams Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 9 /2_0_/1 CRV S 135,500 Cash --/ /_ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained APPLICATION FORM 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW 'fCv MAR PID* 23 116-22 13 0018 Appeal# �r/ Appraiser JS Date Recd�/�6 1991 (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 91{I-65g7 A Work: Name: LOAN. T ‘ 4LISod #1. 6tLle$ Address of Property: 84472 008f4 C,OUrr January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $202.,Is00 Terms of Purchase: 0/60-6 6 Date property acquired; 12/S& Purch se price; $ 227 0°0 Additions and alterations ince purchase: /V�4 Cost of additions and alterations: N//* Is property listed for sale? No If yes, at what price Si (attach copy of listing agreement) / Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S /8. Goo What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): ago 01PPZII.0 4b ✓kL k6 /85 000, ✓ER I Fl Se 8Y Ca4ii1; Z r U41 AFl4e V9L o I4PPEkL -6. c . .f, gure of Owner Please Note: This form requests pri e or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in • preparing tor any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 52500 132500 185000 Res. Homestead Jan. 2, 1989 52500 162200 214700 Res. Homestead . Jan. 2, 1988 52000 160600 212600 Res. Homestead Last Inspection: 4/3 / 90 Appraiser: John Sams Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 4 / 12/ 86 CRV S 242400 7.5% WD / / $ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for reviews 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained : . APPLICATION FORD 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW n f'FC'O:f R 2 5 � PID# 26-1I6-22-44-0043 Appeal# aA AppraiserJ Sams Date Recd. 991 (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: y9l-3J37 �1HRr< ! Work: S31 3 r8Y Name: pLi E1ZI pp /� Address of Property: )0C)36 (J& -7R I�Ggr Y OQP January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ 3 j'j 000 Terms of Purchase: Date property acquired: &JY'j Purchase price: $ 10. 000 / or Additions and alterations since purchase: NS:v Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed for sale? N, It yes, at what price $ (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S P, S:Mslr,ly What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): Signatyke of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the • City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 T1-6600 110000 Land Jan. 2, 1989 2200 2200 Land Jan. 2, 1988 2200 2200 Land Last Inspection: 1/1Q/AI Appraiser: John Sam$ Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments 8/10 / 89 CRV $ 90000 10% WD Lot only --/_/_ $ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained V APPLICATION FOR)) 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW .441 22 gtC'1. ; PIDA12-ll6-22 44 0001 Appee:ip 4)J Appraiser SRS Date Recd. ,4-gf; I -'71 (To be completed by Owner - please print) Telephone Home: ' /'-/1 J/ Work: Name: / :'4Ri/'I14 ;i ( Address of Property: 7 7(:: e A-f-. /�,46caz January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: jr,te Terms of Purchase:Date property property acquired: / F-( Purchase price: Slir • Additions and alterations since purchase: h(' Cost of additions and alterations: Is property listed for sale? 4,r It yes, at what price S • (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: S 22512 ca•c•o) What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): D •. 1 .,_/-'// ter,. ( Signature of Owner /. Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is • helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 1,088,000 1,08$,000 Land Jan. 2, 1989 223,000 2,000 225,000 Green Acres Jan. 2, 1988 150,700 36,800 187,500 Green Acres Last Inspection: _/_/_ Appraiser: Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: • • • Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments / / • / /— S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : • 3) Assessor's value sustained . APPLICATION FORA 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW REC(T APR 23-116-22 14 0039 4 PID* 23-116-22 14 0040 Appeal# �( Appraiser SS Date Recd. '991 (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: 483-8381 Work: 884-2709 Name: Scott D. Elfstrom Address of Property: 11445 Anderson Lakes Parkway January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: $ 5,880.000 Terms of Purchase: Cash & Mortgage Date property acquired: 6/88 Purchase price: $ 400.000 Additions and alterations since purchase: Cost of additions and alterations: Construction on both parcels of Lake Place Apartments Is property listed for sale? No It yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) 1991 is: $ 5,300,000 Owner's estimated market value as of January2, the above stated What are your reasons or documentation supporting rting value? (Please attach supporting information): Income analysis attached. . igna ure of ner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) • Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Classss Jan. 2, 1990 552,000 4,940,000 5,500,000 Apartment Jan. 2, 1989 552,000 3,200,000 3,752,000 Apartment Jan. 2, 1988 363,000 363,000 Land Last Inspection: _/_/_ Appraiser: Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments _/—/— S --/_/_ S • Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained : ' ,11q'1' INCOME STATEMENT ANALYSIS GEC0 APR 4 1991 Lake Place Apartments , 9 December, 1990 —Current Month— —Year to Date— %of %of • Actual Income Budget Actual Income Budget Income 8100.565 S99.531 $1,155,220 $1.194,396 • Expenses. Renting 2.41Q 2.1% 1,650 39,496 3.4 0/0 19,800 Administrative 11.481 13....4_% 10.170 70.83Z _S__,L% 122.040 Operating 10,086 1n n% 7,71S 118.958 ).0.3% 92.820 Maintenance 8.841 8•8_% 5.240 95.641 8.1% 62_RR0 Taxes&Insurance 28,533 28.4% 22.765 * 28.082 2.4% 273.180 Total Expenses 63,351 63.0% 47,560 353,009 30.6% 570.720 Net Operating Income 37.214 37.0% 51.971 802.211, 09.4 0/0 623.676 I i Gross Scheduled Monthly rent per square tool $ .621 j Operating Expenses per unit,per month,to date $ 213.17 Operating Expenses,per square toot, per month, to date $ .187 Cash how for the current month $ • Cash flow year to dale $ Rentable square leet 157,702 .. Revised 5l90 SH-74E 5,Sot.nuVni-,. ,7I- /'.5 4 Op v l tt APPLICATION FORM ,1991 _EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF RDVISW L/ REC'D APR 1 1991 pips 11-116-22- 44-0021 Appeals PJ Appraiser S. Sine/date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home, Name, Marriott Corporation Nork,001)350-$664 Address of Property, iiigi Viking Drive January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice, S._200.000 Terms of Purchase, hi" Date property acquired, Ooened 2/11/89 purchase price, SNIA Additions and alterations sincepurahase, Cost of additions and alterations, Is property listed for sale.? No If yes, at what price S --- (attach copy of listing agreement) owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is, smaknnn What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please(Pleave.attauh spporthincif9 atio ), The assessment does not reflect t e off the real eSLate using the income anoroach. See Attachments Signature of Owner Manager.of Property Tax for Marriott Corp. Please Note, This term requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the eden Prairie board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values, kw. out Total, property Class Jan. 2, 1990 1 -No non 7_mn_nnn R_ap.nnn Cnmmprrial Jan. 2, 1989 N/A Jan. 2, 1988 N/A Last Inspection, / /� Appraiser, Building Permits/Appraiser Comments, Sale Nistori Date Source ;ale Price Terms of Sale Comments /__/_ s --/.._/_ S" Board of Review Action, 1) Referred to Assessor for review, 2) Assessor's value adjusted to 3) Assessor's value sustained , TOTAL P.02 • KT APR 1 199, •`` MarriottDrive ♦ Washington,D.C.20058 TMarrti Corporation arrott International Headquarters Telex:89597 MARCORP BHDA BY U.S. POSTAL SERVICE OVERNIGHT DELIVERY March 28, 1991 City of Eden Prairie Board of Review 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie ., MN 55344 RE: Parcel #: 11-116-22-44-0021 Address: 11391 Viking Drive • Unit #: 31-1T9 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that Marriott Corporation as manager of the referenced property wishes to appeal the 1991 real estate assessment of $8,200,000. Attached is the required application form. If additional information is required please feel free to call me at (301) 380-8664. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, aedt 1-6,GLz- " Heather J. Reichardt Manager, Property Tax & Appraisal Dept. 938.01 Attachment /hjb cc: James R. Vinson, Dept. 938.01 • RECO APR 1 1991 ATTACHMENT A Application for 1991 Eden Prairie Board of Review Parcel ID 11-116-22-44-0021 Courtyard by Marriott Basic Data: Owner: Marriott Corporation Reasons supporting reduction in HMV for the subject property: 1. This property opened in 1989 and is still in the start-up phase. It has not yet stabilized in the marketplace. As can be seen on Attachment D, Property Components of Value, the capitalized losses that are incurred during the start-up phase of a hotel property as well as pre-opening expenses are considered intangible personal property. This value component should not be taxed as part of the real property of the subject. 2. In order to show the impact on net operating income of both the income attributable to the Marriott tradename (goodwill) and the FF&E (furniture, fixtures and equipment) present at the property, please refer to the attached stabilized operating statement (Attachment B) . Deductions have been made for the market cost of management (and the reservation system) provided by Marriott as well as for reserves for replacements (both FF&E and short-live building components). See Attachment C for actual historical income and expense information. The income attributable to the return on the original FF&E investment is deducted also. The capitalized value of the resulting net operating income attributable to real estate only is $4,228,000. 3. The current FMV assessment on this property equates to $55,035 per hotel room. The Residence Inn FMV assessment is $44,900 per hotel suite (also under protest). This is inequitable considering the fact that Residence Inn suites are somewhat larger than Courtyard hotel rooms. Although the Courtyard property is newer than the Residence Inn, the difference should not be a nearly 25% higher assessment. 4. Nationally, the hotel industry has suffered a severe recession over the past one to two years. Because the FMV assessment for this property was not reduced in 1991, the assessment office has not taken into consideration the general economics of the hotel market. <11„`/ L. Heather J. Reichardt Manager, Property Tax March 29, 1991 • I Attachment B Minneapolis Eden Prairie Courtyard Z" F. Unit 119 �, ,�'91 Date 29-Mar-91 Initials NJR Assessment Tear 1991 Stabilized Statement Stabilized as of January 1, 1991 of Income 8 Expense Roe/Occp. Rate/AOR 149 / 65.0%/ $57.25 Amount Ratio Occp Rm Revenues: Rooms Telephone 2,023,800 75.5% 57.25 Food 8 Beverage 150,200 5.6%18.3% 4.25 Other Operated Departments 491,400 14,100 0.5% 13.90 Rentals 8 Other Income0.40 0 0.0% 0.00 Total Revenues 2,679,500 100% 75.80 Departmental Expenses: Rooms Telephone 507,300 25.1% 14.35 Food 8 Beverage 35,400 23.6% 1.00 Other Operated Departments 395,900 80.6% 11.20 0 0.0% 0.00 Total Departmental Expenses 938,600 35.0% 26.55 Unallocated Expenses: General and Administrative 330,500 12.3% 9.35 Base Management Fee Residence InnSystems Mgmt Fee 93,800 3.5% 2.65 Marketing 67,000 2.5% 1.90 Heat, Light and Power 136,600 4.1% 3.10 Repairs and Maintenance 1 ,100 5.1% 3.85 Other Unallocated Expenses 141,400 5.3% 4.00 0 0.0% 0.00 Total Unallocated Expenses 878,400 32.8% 24.85 Fixed Expenses: Real Estate Taxes 400,000 Personal Property Taxes 14.9% 11.32 Licenses and Permits 0 0.0% 0.00 Equipment Rentals 12,000 0.4% 0.34 Property Insurance 1,500 0.1% 0.04 10,000 0.4% 0,28 Totel Fixed Charges 423,500 15.8% 11.98 Reserves for Replacements 134,000 5.0% 3,79 Net Income to Real Estate 8 Tangible Personal Property 305,000 11.4% 8.63 ..................... _______ Capitalization ______N0I to Real 8 Tangible Personal Prop. Add Back Real Estate Taxes 305,000 Less NOI Attributable to Return on FF8E: 705,000 Replacement Cost New per Unit 8,000 Times Number of Rooms x 149 Cost of Replacement 1,192,000 Depreciated to Mid-Point of Useful Life x 50.0% Times Return on Investment 596,000 x 12.5% 74,500 (74,500) Equals N0I Attributable to Real Estate before R.E. Tax 630,500 Basic Rate of Capitalization Add: Real Estate Tax Load 10.0% 4.9% Total Cap Rate 14.9% Real Estate Value Indicated S4,228,314 S/Room =__=--__ = 2,378 1 (} :i \ m2(.iiH K E!■E!K } @i§)7 k EiMIE li ! , 3 FE 1 \\f/\f/} i .iiE; 1 i �e2Ek § JB f f ƒ i117 ° |§ ` | . :/ ! /)"k2`R ;. | - \\�) . §- ! . , �2;8 R ! | .m n ,\ \� !,■_ - . . § ) ig : §ƒ _ ( :lam . . a ! nv ) § V #! ,s .;; t . /£ :. . . .k \ °§ ■ ,«§k k 0\ E. .§ im/ §§ - ■ 0�S,; ,■cad !i N: § k E3 M § Mil'i ) BB§§ B &fi ila P -; , ,..;&! �- |7 )B b kaakbkix k akBb \ a%gib g k\Bkag li i' |\ N. 2 , - ,- \ . ƒ{ }� I�\� k k m\§ a 0,....-.0. of f - - ;�, _ �� k k§§k§k§ kk}kk j k)k\ B kk§)§B � f| !. NB a kk§kikr k kk(aa ( hril k g(6/ig 171 Pla\l ) §k 0 om000mo 0 00,00 0 0000 0 000000 0B |` ii ); . :::::: . :;m:: . ■i §qi ;1' E ■ 2 IEEE § """"' F k7 6. } 0 0 0000000 0 00000 0 0000 ,# V ( . .mmmMXIMM . .MMX/Mm.... . ■■§! § ■3I!@■ - §a ! ], �- N; @ ■§5■IIS 3 913E■E @ §■■§ ■ 22'72" { Attachment D COMPONENTS OF VALUE - OPERATING HOTEL PROPERTY Total Property Entrepreneurial \ Value Profit \ ✓ Corporate Goodwill ) ) A ) Intangible Going-Concern/Business ) Personal L Value: ) Property a. Pre-marketing ) U b. Pre-opening salaries ) c. Absorb initial losses / E / Working Capital \ / Cash on Hand ) C Inventories ) Tangible Personal O Supplies ) Property ) S ) FF&E ) T / g Development Profit \ ) Improvements ) ) Real Estate ) (Assessable Value) ) Demolition/Sitework ) ) ) Land / HJR Marriott Corporation 3/91 • If I -_3-1991 10:u4 FROM LEEN PRAIRIE 10 130ab�331u yb2 P.02 APPLICATION FORM 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW hevAPR PID# 11-116-22-43-0003 Appeal# n Appraiser S. Si 1991 Read 1 19S/ (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: Wor)c:j3011380-8f164 Name: Eden Prairie Hotel Co./Lessee: Residence Inn by Marriott, Inc. Address of Property: 7780 Flying Cloud Drive January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: 55,749,000 Terms of Purchase, Date property acquired:August 1988 Purchase price: S Additions and alterations since purchase: Cost of additions and alterations, Is property listed for sale? No If yes, at what price S (attach copy of listing agreement) owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: $4,600,000 What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): See Attachments * Took over leasehold interest of prior management company. ) 6/1 31/49( Signature of Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: sand Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 1.089.000 4.660,000 5.749_00Q romerrial Jan. 2, 1989 1.037.100 4.437.700 9_479_000 rom:nprrial Jan. 2, 1988 943.000 4.034.000 4.977.000. Cnmmprcial Last Inspection: /__/_ Appraiser: Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History pate Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments - / / $ --/ S Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained t l an APR 1 1991 • '\' Marriott Dnve ,arriott Marriottmatt Corporation Washington,1/380- U G 20058 International Neadquartes 101/180-9000 BY U.B. POSTAL SERVICE OVERNIGHT DELIVERY March 28, 1991 City of Eden Prairie Board of Review 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie , MN 55344 RE: Parcel #: 11-116-22-43-0003 Address: 7780 Flying Cloud Drive Unit #: 57-116 To Whom It May Concern: Pleasq be ae7ised that Marriott Corporation as manager of the refernced property wishes to appeal the 1991 real estate assessment of $5,749,000. Attached is the required application form. If additional information is required please feel free to call me at (301) 380-8664. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Heather J. Reichardt Manager, Property Tax & Appraisal Dept. 938.01 Attachment /hjb •14\y cc: James R. Vinson, Dept. 938.01 ‘i\VMdf't Heather I.Reichardt ?6tndgM rnpert.Appr.awl '7.vnon(1 rrl>r rr.vrrn \i lrrlrltt 1 VA r• 11 a,hlnt(I4/1 I)( 2,0;8 !ill • K JOON:=O A 28A2 O t:224S J P$00 %8 M O" N6 .00N�-O $ 'O.O o �MNVO ' NOOONOO g p �i dm fV P NOOM:O oos$ O NN�t.00 N OOOOMOO N 11 L.O Qp {p tpgp MA iMp ryp .p} ppp� .p 1yy1 tw PO AM OOgAY A MO:°3 O O2.* �4y0 yryW�OOO.a O pN U C N N A INDJ 1 1 NM N NA34 V N 14 .12 f�U4 �}Z, N N N y L Y ���OSSS ppp .pp oryU N NU :00!00 MO.-.- .O !M�NO ^ OOOOOOn A NU L✓yy og u J O O N N O N O�P M 4O N N A O N P O O O'O O N J N • `OA mP ep0 �y � A I..pV{ pp.p n ry N M1 U4 ...di 0 I° mom, A vsiodM 3 �N�pp.00AO O POOO�NO Mpp 44t«N. .ftU qqqyy N J A.O N N NO d AM'* A N 2.- O m N yq N N VI 11 Y K OM N LL `6C AOOppP^pp m OON vMNO t 11000P0 d NM v; O ✓ 000..0 % NOmm AVVW0 N N000000 W Mu ✓ MG Ti .W NX 5pgAxxO g Mg X 55, 51 1 J OMgppNO 0 xU tz u RNOON4-0 Wd*ii N ,OI_O M .8.86.866.8 OO till 1.1 4 ✓p Ce y� v� m Epp pp �p .p .p yCyge ?0 2 ...:20 M 3OAP 1� s•on O POPOOMO N N U Z 6 d' R ; W 2 $24% 1 11_ $ 2 la N N .: Y ui Y 000NM0 A OSOO P1208 yN 8N008A8 P mmY H 6G p ON O O...- OJO P0000 00 U) 1 L NG ' N M„ '% x SU 00 O No. [ig pxdXpppNNuONMpx O 5X x x N P tl' .- I POOM.O 'OF, d �� P P.ONOO N '000000 es; , A, r 2"*IO OON P gO 0 000;0 M IF N 0 ON 0 0 MA 01 O P AA O AZ:Am P g'r O Nii tl9 N O M N N,-mm O My M U p yy N N G L L 4Iw qC yC� ♦C{ yCpE N N N % ` U % S`V q Y 7 1Y U 1NY K�sy Z W 1}u�F ��4Ri ~ Yp;w m C y <y 00C 6 t O 4.9[. ii_OW 6. [4O ..<KZ FZ G W C.✓ C w Y 0 Ow W W 0 W E P Gp yy.� p0�0OU 60W < ,1 WSWZJUNi2ZWa m °ppCatl pmp W'jMp 8 ori<� nrJ"7<zry'�i g p p3 N Zga. . W 200 Y J41.1 .y py 4.[y6 2 Cy\E, yIN.B<6Wi O <N<6W <6C GG< WW �SOU O C W O S O W= OF W W(2 W F K H 2 >Yg..,,.o. F g... O F LLUC66OWo. r U i1F . Jae APR i 1991 ATTACHMENT A Application for 1991 Eden Prairie Board of Review Parcel ID 11-116-22-43-0003 Residence Inn by Marriott Basic Data: Owner: Eden Prairie Hotel Company Lessee: Residence Inn by Marriott (by lease agreement, Residence Inn, a subsidiary of Marriott Corporation, has all control over payment and contesting of real estate taxes) Reasons supporting reduction in FMV for the subject property: 1. As can be seen on Attachment B, the economic indicators for this property have been decreasing or stable for the past several years: a. Occupancy percentage has decreased from 81.0% in 1987 to 71.0% in 1990. b. Average daily room rate has only increased 3.9% over 4 years of operation (a compounded annual rate of increase of only 1.29% per year). c. Gross revenues have decreased approximately $200,000 over the past four years. 2. In contrast to the decreasing economics for this property, the fair market value assessment has increased annually at an extremely high rate: 1987: $4,602,400 1988: 4,740,000 +3.0% 1989: 4,977,000 +5.0% 1990: 5,475,000 +10.0% 1991: 5,749,000 +5.0% These high increases in the fair market value placed on the property by the assessment office do not fairly represent the value trend experienced by the property during the period 1987 through 1990. 3. It is the opinion of the Marriott Property Tax Department that this assessment should have remained the same starting in 1987. The actual operations of the property have not demonstrated the increases that the assessment office has projected each year. eather J. Reichardt Manager, Property Tax, Dept. 938.01 March 29, 1991 1 APPLICATION FOkll 1991 EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW ea APR 5 1991 PIDa 11-116-22 42 0041 A , 7 SRS pp , Appraiser Date Recd. (To be completed by owner - please print) Telephone Home: Work: 439-7812 Name:Donald D. Bromen C.O.D. Kinplyood Mpmt agent fnr Metropolitan Federal Bank, fsb - Owner Address of Property: 7500 Market Place Drive January 2, 1991 valuation as it appears on the notice: S 264,5nn Terms of Purchase: Foreclosure Date property acquired: Purchase price: $ N/A Additions and alterations since purchase: N/A Cost of additions and alterations: N/A Is property listed for sale? yes If yes, at what price S180.000 (attach copy of listing agreement) Owner's estimated market value as of January 2, 1991 is: 5180.00n What are your reasons or documentation supporting the above stated value? (Please attach supporting information): Recent letter from Shenehon-Goodlund-Taylor. Inc. updating 10/31/89 appraisal. See market information attached ,40),,„.,2D05447- ,.) Signature of Owner Donald D. Bromen Kingwood Mgmt, Managing agent for Owner Please Note: This form requests private or confidential data of applicant which is being collected for purposes of review by the City Assessor and the Eden Prairie Board of Review to assist in preparing for any appeals/objections herein. The submission of this data is not mandatory, however, in order to get an accurate assessment of the property prior to the hearing, such data is helpful. (To be completed by the Assessing Department) Prior year values: Land Building Total Property Class Jan. 2, 1990 32000 260000 292000 Commercial Jan. 2, 1989 69000 277000 346000 Commercial Jan. 2, 1988 69000 241000 310000 Commercial Last Inspection: _/ /_ Appraiser: Building Permits/Appraiser Comments: Sale History Date Source Sale Price Terms of Sale Comments / / / /_ Board of Review Action: 1) Referred to Assessor for review: 2) Assessor's value adjusted to : 3) Assessor's value sustained . • %'u APR 5 1991 • KINGWOOD MANAGEMENT `' PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT (612)439-7812 P.O.Box 2010•Stillwater,Minnesota 55082 April 5, 1991 Steve Sinell City Assesors Office Eden Prairie City Hall 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, :IN 55344 Dear Mr. Sinell: Please find enclosed our application for our appeal/re-evaluation of the _eal estate taxes for the property ae represent at 7500 Market Place Drive, Eden Prairie, UN, PT-D lt 11-116-22 42 0041. Working t. ards the sane goals,or Donald D. Bro,nen Managing Agent for Metropolitan Federal Bank, fsb I 'LC"D APR 5 1991 SHL:N1:11ON-GOOULUNI)TAYLOR,INC. 6155 DULUT11 STREET MINNEAPULLS,MIN 5512'2 612644 9S60 January 15, 1991 Mr. David Wicklund Metropolitan Federal Bank P.O. Box 2687 Fargo, North Dakota 58108 RE: 7500 MARKET PLACE DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (Update Appraisal; Original Appraisal Dated October 31, 1989) Dear Mr. Wicklund: In accordance with your request, we have made a preliminary study of the above referenced property as of January 10, 1991. As we discussed, my evaluation of the property deals solely with the land and building and their value as real estate. The preliminary study consisted of a thorough inspection of the interior and exterior in order to obtain accurate information as to its size and condition. Although the above referenced property is unique in many aspects, a comparative study of other similar property sales was undertaken to ascertain how the market in general values this type of real estate. The comparative sales are enclosed for your review. The subject condominium is occupied by three tenants. The leases are short term in nature, i.e. 5 years or less and have the implication of market value. Market resistance may occur since the unit is not free-standing, i.e. a condominium unit is located on the second floor. Based upon this preliminary study, it is your appraiser's belief that if a complete appraisal were made, the final most probable market value estimated is $180,000. You have indicated that a this letter would be satisfactory. You should clearly understand that the value is based on the Sales Comparison Technique only. This approach was the only approach considered because it is upon this basis that office condominium units are sold. If your needs should change and a full appraisal report would be desired, we would be happy to complete the remaining research that it would necessitate. Please feel free to call should any quentions arise. Very truly yours, S FNFN N-7 -TAY , INC. - e n .7 Denis F.. Taylor, MAT, SRPA REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS • ANALYSTS 1•M uy .+i iy•=41 M.it u tLULKrL Kt. _ P.3 ,nrl' .P Co V 0• H A W N N I PI v to N O 0 1••• of CO N In N M F L0.4 CA F O.A n M 01.....O 1••• O N R CO I1 CO ..O P 10 O • aatt a.o A P. CO r N a a Ce tom. t x a .o A n Vn t• 2 9 Wap 2 r � a14HP. 14a t n pr� <t A. V 0 r P. 1-er 0 •r to 1-•. tW A' o w to 0 A 1'•K' H .110 0 E 1...N tf L' n It O et N I-. 1 re •4 0F+0 4W ro mi f' r••.1 V m .0 �c ' a '4 a r $ 44 0 1u .0 a 0 w rn co x 10 �01 ''1 a IAp p :A 7/ �I < A t7 coc ICt• to N 0 W . o • r a 41 4 .4 N a P p. 4 M 0 rr N A P a a N A N N 1•' 1-' H - r t.1 c. 0 0t 0to A A A {r 0, t./NI pO 0' 0' • O w a O' c. O A A pAAp Cl n pA AAA A an A A IA r C o. 0. Q O 0. 0 O O PPP. O IM a r r r r r r o r o o I+` 8 S 8 8 8 8 8 0 o C UI a 0 ai° aA ° w 0 q 14iv A P A 0 P be (AZ M r r I-' 1•' r r r r r r 1Poo.1� e t.1'ef H. to n P1 A• 8 a '4 q '4 tl 8 (2 eu pp PP AO If 0 IN A 14 1Pa to 'D IC4 H 9 3 1- I-' I-. 1-' 1-' r h• F' 1-' 1-• .O 0 SD •W .O 0 0 40 .O to .9 0) CO ... CO CO K_'' m v 1.1 IA PI to tr A 1.4 A A to A as I.• ly y Omi •�O b Co.O O O sO O O G I01 I0 IA. 44 0 44 IA. N 44 4.4 A 1' '1 1 t u 0 Aa p IP-1. ioOOO O O O O O Us O to /f a a o p a o p 0 P1 O 0 O O 0 Cl O S ~ 1�•• 4► N N K 4r N 1..b• th N h1 0. C. U A In V to CO .4 V .O SO lA •' N 1.. N O 0. !./ N CO 'It n CO L.* W 0 0o N v to O U . P w re 63 A ` x 0 n Ir. U oo 2. n 44{A 4►0) NU0 1-.0 totoP. ONO O. A • O00 0O`D v v n. lit N o U II rl so co V a. 1n as W N F+ IZ 0 �7 V fAN nrn it' p. Vl to Vl U. gry P V.V A.F n U O W r h' N n Qt IY IF O.O V.V. N V • N ra. w .o MM W W rN. w 0 n.1 I; � � r� S� Spry M H �• d aPR5 w H m e a r- o 00 0.a 1+ K' o w C•. •N jY a w V.I n 1 � 1991 i�°n '4 u�i r~o ig .d n 0 n ,. .r C) .det, '4 V P V M`i M t' ,ay N N iv •v T., 1-' V4 4 µ at' x ac n c r Cl o A as Ps n ro np. w ry k o A a vI m pa. 1. 1 4. 0 440 44 44 M N MP N N 4* (4'O N to V V. a. V V .C.� U. I,.. 1--. N 0 a. W N.. W W O U O ..1 C." W tW P oa P. P. v0. O 00 I• I V• N NI NIv I... IM f N. NIcr. NI '0 tb .O V la " 41 14 H I JI N ram. '�:or- • W ♦p W N 1rCyy N F W a N 4 M N O h' O V Z W O VI O v. O O + I .,I,. .1.. a a + II 1 jj 44. 44 M a 1 a Co W 4.4 I. N v. 0 6 M01� O U 6 �p toto W v, O 00 G I 1 1 C- I I c. l'' f �� N N N. N in i.. N. v. x O O O O + + a 1 1I 1 I-' I I I R H N O U. 0 O a 1 .. + ..a .. .. " I 44 /A N 44 79 a 1 d iv H L. In N N .1 444 a v`J. o vIv Ofi . x I I { I f a I I I It + + ^ IF n 1 a 1 a w r wn en I00 .E 0. o :0. V v. V. tom►.. A W 4P cf► u► v4 U. ... rn U P rn rn 0. .C) in co A F' W r N. (.�j .Wj. F A N IPI. V. W U y Pi 1 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 1991 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA II. INTRODUCTIONS III. DISCUSSION - ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES A. Surface Water Quality 1. Requirements of Board of Water and Soil Resources 2. Minnesota River 3. Shoreland Management 4. Erosion Control 5. Storm Water Utility B. Wetlands - "No Net Loss" Policy C. Safe Drinking Water Act D. River Bluff Protection E. Landscaping F. Engineering Standards 1. Street Design 2. Drainage Design 3. Boulevard Trees 4. Street Lighting IV. OTHER BUSINESS V. ADJOURNMENT • Water BillBoard The Water BillBoard is a newsletter published cooperatively by the BWSR,the MDH,the SPA,the MDA,and the MPCA. ANNOUNCINC\Is 4April 15, 1991 Vol.3 Editor: BWSR I�t 612-296-3767 (Metro) o No.2 i 1-800-652-9747(Greater Minn.) o o ' o 0 o I a o0 Focus of this issue... Legislative Initiatives The Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources... Legislative Initiatives Wetlands legislation H.F.1 and S.F.3 are the two major wetlands bills.H.F.1,authored by Sen.Willard Munger(Duluth),has been winding its way through the House.S.F.3,authored by Sen.Chuck Davis(Princeton),was the subject of several meetings of the Senate Joint Agriculture/Environment and Natural Resources Ad Hoc Committee.As of April 9,S.F.3 was still in the full Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee. H.F. 1 H.F. 1 passed out of the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee in mid-February and on April 4 overcame its next major hurdle,the House Agriculture Committee.The Agriculture Committeere-referred -eC rr d the Commll to ittee.the Governmental Operations Committee, which will be its last stop before the Appropriations Governmental Operations Committee was scheduled to hear the bill on Thursday,April 11. The Agriculture Committee incorporated numerous amendments Into the bill,clarifying the legislation with respect to agriculture.The following is a brief summary of the bill as it left the Agriculture Committee. Section 1:cites the wetlands legislation as the'Wetland Enhancement,Preservation,and Protection Act of 1991." Section 2:states that the legislative intent is for landowners to receive fair incentive payments for compliance with the provisions of the legislation. Section 3:makes a minor modification to the county board authority to disapprove DNB acquisition of land in the county.If the county disapproves the proposed acquisition t he landowner or the commissioner may submit the matter directly to the Land Exchange Board. 1 Section 4:defines the legislative finding that wetlands are of public value for conserving surface water,for improving and maintaining water quality,for fish and wildlife habitat,for recreation,for floodwater retention,for stream and lake sedimentation reduction,for improved subsurface moisture,for natural beauty of the landscape and for comprehen- sive water management;that it Is the public Interest to achieve a net gain in the quality and quantity of wetlands in Minnesota;and that wetland activities that diminish the value of the wetland should be avoided,minimized or fully mitigated at the expense of the individual who diminished the wetland value. Section 5:requires that local water plans Include identification of high priority areas in the county for wetland restoration. Section 6:allows for wetland restoration,enhancement and mitigation to be done under the repair provisions of the drainage law:allows realignment of a drainage system under the repair provisions to prevent drainage of a wetland. Section 7:provides for an incentive payment,to be administered by the BWSR, to landowners that desire to place the wetland In a RIM-type easement. Section 8:defines local government outside the Metro Area as the county board or city council; defines local government inside the Metro Area as a city council,town board or watershed management organization. Section 9,10,11&12: various definitions. Section 13:defines wetlands consistently with the federal definition under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act and the farm program.Wetlands must have a predominance of hydric soils:must support a prevalence of wetland vegetation under normal circumstances;and must generally be inundated or saturated by surface or ground waters. Section 14:removes statutory language where the owner of a public wetland can apply for a drainage permit ten years after the public designation. Section 15: •adopts the national wetlands inventory as the baseline for the program. •provides that wetlands that are diminished or destroyed are required to be mitigated based on the functional values that are reduced. •provides that mitigation shall generally be in the same watershed or county. •provides that mitigation shall be at a rate of two acres for each acre of drained or filled wetlands if the wetland is less than two acres in size;if the wetland is more than two acres,the mitigation rate is one acre for each altered acre. •provides that requests to add or delete from the wetlands inventory will be decided on appeal to BWSR. Section 16:protects calcareous fens. Section 17&16:protects unique peatlands. Section 19:provides that peat mining is permitted on wetlands subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Peatland Protection Act. Section 20:provides exemptions to the mitigation requirements,Including: •wetlands that are type 1 or 2 and four acres or less in size: •drainage repair to maintain the cropping history; •wetlands that have been farmed six of the ten prior years; •wetlands that are on agricultural land enrolled in the federal farm program; •wetlands that have received a commenced determination under the farm program; •and wetlands that are created as result of beaver dam or culvert blockage. Wild rice lands are exempt from the bill. 2 Section 21: •requires the DNR,In consultation with the BWSR,to promulgate rules for the approval of wetland mitigation plans.Provides an interim panel(composed of DNR,Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,the soil and water conservation district,the watershed district,and the county or city)to judge mitigation plans until the rules are completed; •provides that issues of size and type are decided by a evaluation panel of DNR,the SWCD,and the engineer of the local government; •sets up administrative procedures for the decision making; •provides that appeals of decisions on the mitigation plan are to the BWSR; •provides that decisions on all mitigations plans are by the local unit of government; •establishes an advisory committee consisting of a balanced diversity of interests to advise on rule making and on progress and issues relating to implementation. Section 22:allows local units to adopt rules more restrictive than the state rules. Section 23:provides further statement that allows repair and maintenance of drainage systems to maintain farming practices and cropping history. Section 24:provides enforcement provisions and makes violations of the act a misdemeanor. Section 25:allows forest management activities on forested wetlands if the activities do not result in filling or drainage of the wetlands. (Section 26:This section,which increased water use permit processing fees to pay for the wetland program,was deleted at the April 5 meeting.The following sections were consequently re-numbered.) Section 26:provides for exemption for development projects and ditch Improvements that have received preliminary or final approval within and outside the Metro Area respectively. Section 27:A minor repealer Section 28:provides for appropriation and bonding for the wetlands Incentive payment program and other RIM activities in the following amounts: •$20,000,000 for wetland payments;(BWSR) •$5,000,000 for wetland restoration;(BWSR) •$10,000,000 for RIM reserve program;(BWSR) •$15.000,000 for other RIM activities;(DNR) Section 29:provides for General Fund appropriations In the following amounts: •$200,000 for Minnesota Extension Service; •$200.000 for beaver control.(DNR) Specific funding for the administration of the regulatory aspects of the legislation will be considered in the Appropria- tions Committee.The administration will include grants to local government to implement the program and staff and funding for the DNR and BWSR for implementation,training and assistance to local government. S.F.3 The Senate Joint Agriculture/Environment and Natural Resources Ad Hoc Committee on Water has spent several meetings debating S.F.3.On March 26,the bill was approved and re-referred to the full Environment and Natural lesources Committee,where it remained when this publication went to press(April 10).Although the basic framework of the bill was unchanged during the meeting,a number of Important amendments were added. Among other things, committee members approved amendments changing the local regulation lead from soli and water conservation 3 districts to the local water planning authority of the counties and water management organizations(WMOs);setting k forth a timeline for the identification of wetlands and landowner appeals:authorizing the BWSR to make grants for the education and training of local governments officials about implementation of the bill;and providing for the valuation of agricultural lands,Including wetlands,for property tax purposes. A brief summary of the bill as it left the ad hoc committee: ARTICLE 1 Section 1:cites the legislation as the Wetland Preservation,Enhancement,Restoration and Establishment Act. Section 2:sets forth the legislative policy for management of wetlands as one of: •identifying and prioritizing the importance of wetlands; •promoting multiple use of wetlands; •replacing lost public value of wetlands; •and compensating owners for protecting public value of wetlands. ARTICLE 2 Sections 1,2,&3:require local water plans to include Identification of high priority regions for wetland preservation, enhancement,restoration and establishment. Section 4: •requires DNR and BWSR to identify wetlands using the National Wetlands Inventory and other information developed by state,local and federal agencies. •provides that maps are to be published in local legal papers. •provides that landowners may appeal Identification to the local SWCD. •provides that appeals of the local decision may be made to the BWSR;its decision is final. •affirms that identification does not diminish the landowner's right of ownership or grant the public any right to access. •allows property owners to use the wetland for pasture or cropland during periods of drought as long as no ditches,tiles or buildings are constructed and to fill limited area to accommodate wheeled irrigation. •requires the BWSR,in consultation with DNR,to establish rules to administer the program,including public value of wetlands and a classification of wetlands based on allowable uses.The rules must be completed by March 1,1993. ARTICLE 3 Sections 1&2:establish wetland preservation areas in which landowners may place wetlands. Section 3:requires all agencies and organizations using eminent domain to acquire lands affecting a wetland in a preservation area to have the action reviewed by the Environmental Quality Board(EQB).The EQB may delay the action for up to one year. Section 4: prohibits various public and private actions, including sewer systems, water systems, and drainage systems.etc., in wetland preservation areas. Section 5: requires sound soil conservation practices, as prescribed by the BWSR model ordinance, on land surrounding a wetland preservation area. Section 6:exempts wetlands in a wetland preservation area from taxation. Section 7:provides payment to counties for lost revenue from the tax exemption on wetland preservation areas. ARTICLE 4 Section 1: sets up a wetland preservation,enhancement, and restoration fund administered by the BWSR to compensate landowners,restore wetlands,create wetlands and enhance and preserve wetlands. • 4 Section 2:establishes a special wetland fund In the state treasury. Section 3:transfers$15,000,000 each year until 2001 from the trust fund and the Minnesota future resources fund to the wetlands fund. ARTICLE 5:establishes a wetland establishment and restoration program tailored after the state drainage program that will allow local units of government to establish and restore wetlands and pay for them. ARTICLE 6:WETLAND USE PERMITS Sections 1,2,3,4,5,&6:provide for technical changes not affecting the current law. Section 7:defines local government for purposes of the legislation;builds on the local water planning process by referencing counties and water management organizations as the lead for local implementation of the law;provides a definition of wetlands consistent with the federal definition of wetlands. Section 8:defines the the following roles of state and local governments in the wetlands program: •DNR shall promote and be an advocate for wetlands; •BWSR shall provide policy and procedure guidance to local governments; •SWCDs shall provide the technical support to the decisions makers: •Counties,cities,and water management organizations are the permitting authority. Section 9: •provides for exemptions to the legislation as follows: •wetlands that are cropped or in a crop rotation seeding six of the last ten years; •wetlands that have a commenced determination under the farm program; •wetlands affected by a repair and maintenance of existing public and private drainage systems; •wetlands covered by a general permit under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. •provides for the administration of the permitting requirements of the legislation. •provides for rule making by BWSR for the legislation. •provides direction to BWSR for statewide activity permits for specific projects,Including: •placement of urban services to residential houses; •normal maintenance and minor repair of structures: •erosion control structures; •peat mining and exploration; •interstate pipeline construction,operation,and repair, •forest management activities,Including forest road construction; •repair and maintenance of public works; •aquiculture activities; •wild rice production activities; •duck blinds: •public highway and utility activities that do not result in additional wetland encroachment. •provides that appeals on the permitting decision may be made to BWSR. Section 10:provides for compensation to landowners for loss of private use of thewetland;gives BWSR administration authority for the compensation;provides that compensation shall not exceed 70%of the average equalized estimated market vale of agricultural land,minus the cost to convert the land;and provides that compensation shall be in the form of a perpetual easement on the wetland. Section 11:requires BWSR to adopt rules to implement the compensation program. 5 Section 12:pro hibtts persons violating the wetland permitting from transferring the title to the property until the impacts have been corrected and the landowner has reimbursed the wetlands fund for the cost of public value to the wetland. DNR shall enforce all provisions of the law. Section 13:requires DNR and BWSR to report annually on the status of the program and the gains and losses of wetlands in the state. Section 14:requires DNR and BWSR to, In consultation with federal agencies, develop a plan to simplify and coordinate wetland permitting. Section 15:provides for the protection of significant peatlands in the state. ARTICLE 8 Section 1:requires BWSR to make grants to the Minnesota Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts to train local governments. ARTICLE 9:changes the way in which the adjusted gross tax capacity is computed for agricultural land. Mediation and dispute resolution H.F.999 is a proposal to limit the types of Issues that come before the BWSR that require the services of the State Office of Hearing Examiners.Due in part to the different statutes that were Involved in the 1987 agency merger that created the BWSR,there is confusion and inequity in the mediation and dispute resolution process.H.F.999 attempts to clarify and simplify the process by limiting the mandate for use of an Administrative Law Judge to only rule making activities.This measure would make the BWSR more responsive to local government and citizens,as well as reducing agency costs by an estimated$50,000-3100,000 per year. if this legislation does not succeed, this cost will unfortunately continue to be paid through funds from other programs. BWSR authority to receive gifts and acquire interest in land Legislation has been introduced to give the BWSR the authority to receive gifts from other organizations to further existing BWSR programs.Organizations such as Pheasants Forever and the Waterfowl Association may desire to BWSR's wetland restoration program;however,because the BWSR is not currently authorized to accept such gifts. a transfer of funds is difficult.This legislation would permit such agreements. Levy adjustment for local water plan implementation S.F. 1273 (Morse, D. R. Frederickson,Price,J. Johnson) provides a special levy for local water implementation activities.Last year.the legislation granted counties the authority to levy in order to become eligible for certain BWSR water planning grants.S.F.1273 allows local government to levy an additional amount to implement elements of the comprehensive local water plan approved by BWSR.S.F.1273 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Taxes &Tax Law,Sen.Doug Johnson,Chair,205 Capitol,296-4839. As of April 10,no number had been assigned to the house file;it is expected that it will be referred to the House Committee on Taxes,Rep.Ogren,Chair,443 State Office Bldg.,296-7808. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency... Legislative initiatives The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA)has proposed three main legislative initiatives this year.a housekeep- ing bill,a bill relating to spill prevention and response coordination,and the Comprehensive Toxic Air Pollutant Reduction Act (a summary of each of these bills was presented in February 26, 1991,'Water BillBoard'). The housekeeping bill has passed policy committees in both houses and has been sent to the House Appropriations 6 • Committee and the Senate Finance Committee. The spills bill has been sent to the House floor;it has not yet had a hearing in the Senate. The toxic air pollutant bill has not yet been introduced. Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvements When people think of wetlands,many think of large undefined open-water areas. Some people may realize these ecosystems usually have a large diversity of aquatic plants and animals. Few realize that natural wetlands perform several important water quality and quantity functions,including reducing the sediment load,reducing nutrients and toxics,serving as habitat,regulating flows,and recharging ground water resources. A relatively new idea gaining in popularity is to construct wetlands in hopes of creating these same benefits. Constructed wetlands are currently in use in the United States to treat wastewater,leachate,acid mine drainage,and stormwater flows. The consensus of the experts working in this field In other areas of the U.S.is that the Issue Is no longer whether these systems will work but rather,what the optimum design parameters are. These systems,however,are still In the pilot stage in our more northem climate.For more information regarding these systems,please contact Howard Markus at the MPCA at 612-296-7295 or call the state's toll-free number(1-800-652- 9747)and ask the operator for the MPCA. Nonpolnt source activities and Section 319 of the Clean Water Act Lately,the phrase"Section 319"has been heard frequently in the MPCA. Section 319 refers to the 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act.This section has provided funding for a variety of nonpoint source projects.and,by requiring the states to develop a nonpoint source (NPS)assessment report and management program, Section 319 has provided the Impetus to establish a statewide nonpoint source program. The assessment report called for under the section was required to Identify navigable waters affected by NPS,as well as the pollution sources contributing to the problem.The management program was required to propose an integrated strategy for addressing water quality problems Identified in the assessment report. MPCA,the lead agency for the NPS program In Minnesota,submitted the Initial NPS management program to the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)for approval in 1988. In 1989,the program was approved by EPA and designated as the basis for implementation and funding decisions for the four year period between 1988 and 1992. Many new NPS activities and programs have been initiated since the 1988 program was approved,resulting in a need for revising and updating the 1988 management program. MPCA has initiated a revision process involving the active participation of 20 local,state and federal agencies. A first draft of the revision will be ready for review in April 1991. Additional revisions and opportunities for review will occur throughout the summer,with a final draft submitted to EPA by December 1991. If you are interested In further information or would like to review the draft management plan, please contact Dorothy Stainbrook at the MPCA at 612-297-8218 or call the state's toll-number(1-800-652-9747)and ask the operator for the MPCA. In addition to the program revision,a parallel planning effort has been underway In preparation for the Section 319 grant proposal for fiscal year(F.Y.)1991. Last year Minnesota received$1,277,139 in grant monies,with an additional $250,000 awarded In recognition of outstanding NPS programs. This year's grant application Includes 45 proposals from a variety of local,state and federal entities,for a total request of$4,665,000. This significant Increase in 319 proposals, as well as the active participation of numerous agencies In 319 work efforts. is clearly Indicative of Minnesota's commitment to combating nonpoint source pollution. MPCA extends its thanks to all who helped reinforce this commitment. 7 Status of MPCA dioxin standard-setting Dioxin is the common name for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin,a substance that has been shown to be highly bioaccummulative in aquatic life and is a potentiat carcinogen.One activity that produces dioxin is paper production that uses a chlorine bleach process. Last spring,due to scientific controversy over the cancer potency slope and the bioaccumuiation factor,the MPCA withdrew its proposed dioxin standard during the hearings on the water quality standards for toxics. The MPCA is currently in the process of reviewing and revising state water quality standards for dioxin to attempt to set a new statewide standard. (With no standard In place, the MPCA has been using procedures described in the water quality rule to develop site specific criteria to control dioxin.)As part of that process,a public meeting was held in the MPCA's board room on March 4,1991,to solicit outside public opinion on a proposed statewide water quality standard for dioxin. At the beginning of the hearing,the Minnesota Dept.of Health(MDH),the MPCA,and the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)made informational presentations. David Gray from MDH explained the human health aspect of this issue. Larry Sheppard from EPA said that there were no immediate plans to change the current EPA dioxin criterion. He said that the cancer potency factor may decrease,but the bioaccumuiation value may increase. Debra McGovern, chief of the Water Quality industrial Section of the MPCA,addressed the concept of pollution prevention by reducing toxics production at the source. Five individuals from the public spoke at the meeting.Don Arnosti,a representative of the Minnesota Audubon Society, supported the adoption of a statewide standard and said that the state should enforce the concept of zero discharge of dioxin by using alternative paper production methods. Amosti also questioned whether or not the proposed standard is protective for wildlife. Leslie Davis,a representative of Earth Protectors,urged the MPCA to promote zero discharge of dioxin. Bill Galloway,representing Greenpeace,said that the proposed standard should have been calculated using toxic equivalent factors for dioxin and furans and that the current proposed standard didn't adequately protect human health.Jim Jackson from Boise Cascade Corporation was the only industrial representative who made a presentation.Jackson said that Boise Cascade does not support the proposed statewide dioxin standard. He described the conclusion of the dioxin conference In Bandbury,Conn.,which Indicate that the EPA dioxin criterion may be too stringent. Jackson also said that Boise Cascade has spent$200,000,000 to control dioxin and that paper industry marketing representatives claim that the public prefers white paper.Kathy Norlien,from Project Environment Foundation,supported the adoption of the same standard the MPCA had withdrawn a year ago(0.0022 parts per quadrillion), but felt that this level was not protective enough for wildlife. Additionally, she promoted pollution prevention,the use of unbleached paper,and the use of fish blomarkers. The MPCA will be accepting written comments until April 26, 1991. After the close of the comment period, recommendations on a statewide dioxin standard will be developed by MPCA staff. if readers have any questions or comments,please call Dann White of the MPCA at 612-296-7237 or call the state's toll-number(1-800-652-9747)and ask the operator for the MPCA. Videotapes Available The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)has developed four videotape productions about the EPA water quality standards program. These videotapes are designed to provide Information about the role and importance of the water quality standards program In the effort to cleanup our nation's waters. The video tapes are available to environmental and public interest groups,educational institutions,local governments,federal and state agencies,and industrial and other organizations for use in conferences,workshops,and educational forums. The titles of the productions are: •"Introduction to Water Quality Standards" •"Antidegradation Policy:A Means to Maintain and Protect Existing Uses and Water Quality" •"Development of Water Quality Criteria and Its Relationship to Water Quality Standards" •"Enumeration Methods for E.Coll and Entercoccl" 8 • The tapes are available for loan from the following addresses: Larry Shepard,Water Quality Standards Coordinator EPA,Region 5 Water Division 230 South Dearborn Street Chicago,IL 60604 312-886-0135 Frances A.Desselle EPA Office of Water Regulations and Standards Criteria and Standards Division 401 M Street,SW(WH-585) Washington,D.C. 20460 202-475-7320 Additional information about the water quality standards program is available from Frances Desselle at the address listed above. Minnesota Dept. of Health Legislative initiatives Wells and borings The past two years have seen major changes In the laws pertaining to wells and borings. One of MDH's legislative initiatives this year proposes to amend portions of the laws on wells and borings,contained in M.S.Chapter 1031. Changes outlined In the Initiative(H.F.783/S.F.842)include: •defining a'Well in use"as a well that operates on a daily,regular,or seasonal basis and including a well used for irrigation,fire protection,or emergency pumping. •allowing the commissioner of health to regulate the modification and repair of wells and borings. •allowing delegated well programs to charge a well sealing fee. •allowing delegated well programs to require well permits instead of notifications. •allowing the commissioner of health to establish monitoring well contractor registration requirements which allow for qualification on the basis of factors other than engineering registration or hydrogeologist/hydrologist certification. •limiting the information requirement on the well label to the unique number. •requiring that if a well owner and a property owner are different persons,they sign a written agreement determining responsibilities for permits,fees,and sealing. •requiring maintenance permits for wells that are not in use. •eliminating the requirement to file well disclosure for the sale or transfer of severed mineral interests and Individual condominium units;however,the condominium association or other responsible party must report the location and status of all wells in common areas by Jan.1,1992. •requiring that a property buyer pay a$10 well disclosure processing fee. •requiring notification to the health department or delegated county prior to sealing a well. •requiring that all well reports,permits,and notifications be filed prior to license or registration renewal. •establishing the process for issuing corrective orders. 9 The State Planning Agency Legislative Initiatives State environmental agencies Legislation calling for a study of the organization of state environmental agencies is making Its way through the legislature.H.F.542,authored by Rep.Jeff Hanson,and S.F.551,authored by Sen.Len Price,makes the Environmental Quality Board(EOB)responsible for reporting to the legislature by Feb.1,1992,on how state programs and agencies might be more efficiently organized.This legislation closely parallels Gov.Carson's Initiative to study reorganization of the state's environmental agencies by the Commission on Reform and Efficiency(CORE). Wetland Principles The Environmental Quality Board adopted"Principles for No Net Loss"wetland legislation at its March 21, 1991, meeting.These principles are based on the Minnesota Water Plan.Key points include: •establishing a policy of no net loss of wetland quantity,quality,and biological diversity. •using wetland mitigation and banking within watersheds to safeguard wetland values and provide flexibility. •making incentive payments under certain conditions to defray landowner costs of wetlands protection while obtaining necessary funds from sources linked to the public values being protected. •administering wetland regulations through the Dept.of Natural Resources with help from local water planning authorities. Studies now underway The EQB Water Resources Committee is now developing plans and assessments due this fait.These include the state water resources monitoring plan;an evaluation of state water research needs and priorities;an assessment of water quality trends;and an assessment of water availability trends.If you have opinions or relevant information concerning any of these areas,please contact John Wells or Marilyn Lundberg,612-297-2602;or call the state's toll-free number. 1-800-652.9747,and ask for the State Planning Agency. Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture Publications Available The 1991 Greenbook,the Dept.of Agriculture's Energy and Sustainable Agriculture Program's report,Is out. For copies.contact Unda Bougie,612-296-7673. The 1991 Minnesota Agricultural Land Preservation Program Status Report is out.For copies,contact Doug Wise, 612.296.5226. Calendar April 17:Agricultural Chemical Response and Reimbursement Account(ACRRA)board meeting.8:30-10:30 a.m., Dept.of Agriculture conference room 1.For more information,contact Sharon Huber,612-297.3490. April 23-25:"Human Resources/Natural Resources:Diversity for Success"conference,organized by the Midwest Women in N""rat Resources, in Stevens Point,Wisc.For more information, contact Dana Nelson. University of Wisconsin,7 .i46.3717. 10 May 15:ACRRA board meeting,8:30-10:30 a.m.,Dept.of Agriculture conference room 1.For more Information, contact Sharon Huber,612-297-3490. May 22-23:Waste Pesticide Collection, Milan, Minn. For more information, contact Roger Larson (Chippewa), 612-269-6521;Jon Olson (Lac Qui Parte), 612-598-3325;or Pat Maher(Swift),612-843-3796. Preregistration is required. Sept.27-Oct.2:North American Association for Environmental Education will hold its 20th annual conference at the St.Paul Radisson.The theme is"Confronting Environmental Challenges in a Changing World."For more information contact Elizabeth Jones,612-854-5900. Nov.5-6:24th Annual Water Resources Conference will be held at the University of Minnesota.The planning committee Is currently seeking proposals for presentations on items like water quality,wetland mitigation case studies and engineering case studies.For more Information,contact Bev Ringsak,612-625-6689. Minnesota Extension Service Field Days June 25:Crops and Soils Day,south central experiment station,Waseca,Minn. June 26:Summer Field Day,southwest experiment station,Lamberton,Minn. July 11:Summer Field Day,west central experiment station,Morris,Minn. July 17:Summer Field Day,northwest experiment station,Crookston,MN. July 18:Visitor's Day,north central experiment station,Grand Rapids,MN. July 31:MSEA Site and Anoka Sand Plan Demo Project Tour. Aug.1:Water Quality Tour,Rosholt Farm,Westport,MN. Aug.6-8:FarmFest,Austin,MN. For more information,call the Minnesota Extension Service,612.625-2787. • • 11 -MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DATE: April 19, 1991 SUBJECT: Safe Drinking Water Act(SDWA) In preparation for the Council work session on April 23, I have attached a three pieces of information for your review: 1. SDWA update, November, 1988,by Black&Veatch. This brochure is several years old, but it does briefly list the primary issues regarding the 1986 Amendment. 2. An excerpt from"Washington Report",an AWWA monthly report dated January, 1991. The article entitled "EPA promulgates final Phase II Rule" generally reveals that the second phase of rules have come into effect and that compliance by 1992 is required. 3. An excerpt from "Notice of Significant Regulatory Action" from AWWA, dated February 27, 1991. These two pages generally discuss the regulations as currently adopted by EPA. While much more information is available, the attachments generally indicate that a great deal more testing will be required of all water supply systems in the near future. Public Works staff has done the following to begin this process: 1. After the development of the list of contaminates in the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Amendment, we tested our water supply for as many of the listed chemicals and contaminates that the local laboratory could technically handle. This work was done in 1987 and generally found that no particular areas of concern were identified. 2. The Minnesota Department of Health annually tests for 54 volatile hydrocarbons through our annual inspection process and have found no items outside the standards. 3. We are currently requesting proposals from two laboratories to analyze our water against the final rules as recently adopted. When the work was performed in 1987,the cost was approximately$4,000. Since the list is longer at this time, we can expect $6,000 or $7,000 for this testing program. In discussions with the Health Department,it is likely that the monitoring requirements for Phase II organic and inorganic chemicals will not be required until January 1, 1993. At that time, there will be an expected three-year compliance period to make appropriate changes to our system if in fact we are found to be in violation. Because of our well protected ground water system in the metropolitan area,the Health Department does not believe that there will be a great deal of difficulty with these contaminantes. For example, this may not be the case in the southeast corner of the State since their water supply is not nearly so deep nor as well protected with bedrock. The Department of Health believes that two pending rules are likely to cause more difficulty for metropolitan communities. A new rule for lead levels is due next month. This could have a major impact on many communities, but because of our lime softening treatment plant,this is likely to be less of a problem than for many of our neighbors. The difference being that pH generally need to be less than 8 for a problem with lead contamination. We raise the pH to deliver water to our system to approximately 9. The other anticipated problem is radon and the rules are expected in late 1991. The Health Department is saying it will likely be three years before the rule becomes effective, but radon is a naturally occurring element in this part of Minnesota. Again, because we have a treatment facility, compliance with this rule may be relatively easy to meet. I will be prepared to address these issues in greater depth at the meeting. EAD:ssa SPWA November 1988 '4 What Does the Safe Drinking Water Act Say. g 0 1"1r a7F ere Does EPA Stand Todd, ? • at Issues Should You Address 'irst. low an Water Suppliers epare for These Re-utrencents' Why Should You ' epare Now for Future Changes?• , ^_,:7 ....�:. 01BIacK&Veatch Black&Veatch has answered many of the questions asked about the 1986 Amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act and related regulations in two previous publications In this one,we're providing questions as welt As additional standards and proposed regulations are finalized,utilities can no longer afford a"watt and see"attitude. This is a time for introspection,a time to ask yourself where you stand in relation to new requirements. Evaluating your position and planning your course now will give you a head start in scheduling,budgeting,and funding any necessary system changes.This will enable you to comply with new mandates within the required time frame,thereby avoiding non-compliance penalties and promoting positive public relations. What Does the Safe Drinking Water Act(SDWA/Say? The SDWA was amended in 1986.The amendments require establish Maximum Contaminant Level Goals(MCLGs)in con- EPA's Office of Drinking Water to develop drinking water junction with MCLs.IMCLGs are non-enforceable numerical standards for 83 specific contaminants by.tune 1989.Drink- goals.)The SDWA included provisions requiring EPA to pro- ing water standards,more formally called National Primary mulgate criteria for filtration of surface water supplies and Drinking Water Regulations INPDWR), may he either disinfection of all water supplies.and to ban the use of lead- numerical limits called Maximum Contaminant Levels IMCLsi containing materials in the drinking water supply system,in- or treatment technique requirements.EPA is also required to eluding home plumbing materials. Where Does EPA Stand Today? Table I presents the nine drinking water standards that EPA As indicated in Table 2,EPA will mandate at least two treat- has promulgated since passage of the 1986 amendments to the ment technology requirements:filtration for surface water sup- SDWA.Table 2 presents the parameters for which standards plies and disinfection for all water supplies.These two regu- have been or will he proposed and the type of standard— latory efforts will probably have the greatest impact on today's whether a numerical limit or a treatment technique—to be pro- water treatment operations and the cost of water supplied to mulgated.The remaining contaminant regulations are in some the customer.EPA has already proposed filtration and disin- intermediate stage of development,as noted in the"Status" fection requirements for surface water supplies in the Surface column of Table 2.The MCLG and MCL values presented in Water Treatment Rule(see Table 3 for a description of pro- Table 2 are not final,and may be subject to change in the posed requirements).It is expected that the same disinfection future.Table 3 presents a summary of the proposed treatment performance requirements will ultimately be applied to all technique requirements to be regulated under the Safe Drink- source water types. ing Water Act. What Issues Should You Address First? • To evaluate how well your utility will perform in this new regulatory environment,ask yourself the following questions in five key areas: Disinfection Treatment. Would my utility meet the new Filtration Treatment(Surface Water Supplies). How disinfection treatment performance criteria,based on sufficient well does my filtration process perform with respect to filter Concentration x Time(CT)values,to achieve adequate inacti- effluent turbidity levels(less than 0.5 NTU 95 percent of the vation of such microorganisms as Giardia cysts,viruses,and time),effects of backwashing,and length of runs? maybe even Cryptosporidium? Disinfection Byproducts. Once achieving adequate dis- Monitoring Requirements. On the whole,water sup- infection,could my utility meet lower standards for disinfec- pliers can expect monitoring activity to increase dramatically tion byproducts such as trihalomethanes,and chlorate and in the future.Such an increase has already been observed:for chlorite ions? example,groundwater supplies must now be monitored for volatile organic chemicals at points representative of each Lead Contamination and Corrosion Control. This well—not the final supply. may be a massive research project for everyone,especially where there are new homes with copper plumbing in the ser- How should sampling be conducted?Who will perform the vice area and the delivered water has a pH of less than 8 units. analysis?Should I upgrade my laboratory facilities to meet the new monitoring requirements—or should additional sarn- If I test overnight samples from newly-soldered plumbing for piing and analysis be contracted out?What quality control can lead and copper content,will I find that my current corrosion I install for all desired analyses—finished water analyses,as control practices are adequate?if not,what will be required well as process control and feed chemical quality testing? for my system to satisfy the requirements? How Can Water Suppliers Prepare for These Requirements? The first—and probably most important—thing water suppliers Utilities should also consider undertaking a comprehensive can do to prepare for the upcoming regulations is to talk to Safe Drinking Water Act Assessment.This is a compliance their state regulatory agencies.It is vital that utilities main- evaluation of a utility's current operations as compared to the tain a close communications link with these agencies because new and anticipated regulations that can be done entirely in- the governing regulations will be enforced at the state level. house or in conjunction with a consultant.However a utility Maintaining a positive interactive relationship with the regu- chooses to proceed,it would be advisable to involve the state lators will help both parties in the development and implemen- or local regulatory agency in all assessment actions.This will tation of reasonable and feasible regulations. help establish a continuity of efforts and knowledge and reduce the chance that tomorrow's changes in the regulatory devel- opment will nullify the efforts undertaken today. Why Should You Prepare Now for Future Changes? •..,, , --_'"-. Water utilities have historically exhibited independence and If you can convey your specific needs and attached costs to your fiscal conservatism,financing water supplies on a"pay as you customers,area voters,and investors before they are over- go"basis.Meanwhile,other public services have relied more whelmed with other requests,you are in a better position to heavily on federal and state grant programs.As grants become obtain an adequate share of available funds and public sup- more scarce,water utilities will find themselves competing port.Preparing now will also give you ample time to develop with other public works agencies for limited local funds. optimal solutions. Water quality specialists at Black&Veatch can help you improve the quality of your drinking water supply and comply with in- creasingly stringent standards.If you would like assistance in answering specific questions about your utility,outlining a course of action, or implementing changes—or if you would like copies of our two previous SDWA publications,please contact ss Table I fable 2 Final National Primary Remaining Parameters to be Regulated Drinking Water Regulation under the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments ,i•;, Y = -„n -.Typed:. NPDMRTobeDeideyid Numerical Limits - ..•a G °Ce�MCLG "MCL'F`BMCL Pweefae . ',Status* < I I 1 Y:°pranee[_ . .;.;, g/11_la/D (.g ) Filtration Criteria P - - - Y Disinfection-Surface Water P - - Y Fluoride 4.0 4.0 2.0 Giardia tamhiia P 0 - - Y Enteric Viruses P 0 - - Y VOCs Heterotrophic Plate P - - - Y Turbidity P - - - Y Benzene 0.0 0.005 - Legronelta P o - - Y Total Conforms P 0 0 - N Vinyl Chloride 0.0 0.002 - Lead P 0 - - Y Copper P 1.3 - - Y Carbon Tetrachloride 0.0 0.005 - Acrylamtde D .. - - Y Ahichlor D 0.002 - N 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.0 0.005 - Aldicurb D 01 0.010 - N Aldiearb Suifonide D 01 0_010 - N Trichloroethylene 0.0 0.005 - Aidicarbsulfane D .04 0.040 - N AtDichlorobenzene 0.075 0.075 0.005 Cor D .tat 0.00 - N P' Carbefo(uran D .114 0.040 - N 1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.007 0.007 - Chlordane - D 0.002 - N Drbromochloropropane D 00002 - N 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.200 0.200 l - o-Dichlorobeneene D .6 0.000 0.010 N cis-1.2-Dtchtoraetbylene D .07 O.MO N trans1.2-oicblaroethylene D .07 0.070 N r..,wue.Memmum t.,mtom,nu,st..«i,.o.n..nm,ewn.-.wore n..-.e....«.thw.r I.2-Dirhtoropropone D 0.0115 0.005 N sw uperutma nm.Weruiu,n., 2.4-D D .07 0070 - N Monitoring Requirements Epichintohydrin D - - Y Etbvlhenrene D .7 0700 0.030 N '74 .. - �a;arerf Ethylene Dtbromide D 0.WM5 - N �'t :.: 11epeot a.. r, ,",. ^ ? .,2 -t Heptachlor D 0A002 - N �.'A.emmplio� L.000llon Heptachlor Epoxide D O.OlXl2 N Fluoride I Undone u 000'2 UAtw2 - ' N Methoxvehlur D .4 U.4fw N Surface Annually Annually Distribution Monorhlurobenerne D t O.1tRt o HIO N $Ground System PCBs D U 0.0005 - N Y Pemachherophenoi D U.2 0:.%n o r30 N Vt7Cs-" Styrene D 0 0.005 0.010 N Tetrachlornethylene D 0 0.005 - I N t Surface I Quarterly Quarterly Distribution Tnluane -D 'L 'L 00.0 0.040 N • Water if Detected System 7bxaphenr D 0 0.0055 N • YA.S•TP D 0.05 0.0511 N Every 3-5 Xylene D 10 10.000 0.020 N years if Arsenic D 0 0.030 - N Absent Asbestos D 7 MFI. 7 NFL - N Barium D 5 S.Utw - N Groundwater Quarterly Quarterly Each Well Cadmium D 0.005 0005 - N if Detected Alter Chromium D 0.1tX1 0.1110 - N Every 3-5 Treatment Mercury D 001y2 0.002 - N • years if Nitrate D 10.0 1I000 - N • Nitrite D 1.0 100r N Absent Selenium D 0.05 0.050 N Aluminum I) - - 0.050 N In,tuf d.w.s.,m..nit$,na..wr..p„eo.,...“.n.n.m..,..d.p.nd,mt,.,.,-t.m Silver D - - 0090 N "'^ Radium-220 A 0 - - - Radium-23a A 0 - - - Uramum A 0 - - - Radon A 0 - - - Gn'osn•Alpha A 15 - - - Gross-Beta • A 50 - - - Sulfate U - - - - Nichel U - - - - . Anumnnv U - - - - Thallium U - - - - Beryllium U - - - - Cyanrde U - _ - - Methylene Chloride U 1 - - - - Chloroh noent• U - - - - Thchlornh scene U - - - - Endnn U -- - - - Dalapnn U - _ - - Dutuat U I ._ - Endnthau U - _ - - Glyphosute U - _ ._ - Adtpates U ._ _ - - I.1.2-•htrhlsoethnne U - - -- - Vydate U - _ - - Simnrme U - -- - - • PAIia U - - - - Phthalates It - - - • - Pidoram U - - - - Dinuseb It - - - • - Hexachluraq•rlopentadtene U - - - Disinfection Groundwater U - - - Y Disinfection Bv-Product U - - - - Status.F•',enai.i'-Proposed.D-Draft.A-Advpnrad ti.aa«.U-t'ndevsluped. Table 3 Proposed Treatment Technique Drinking Water Standards Under the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments :Proposed Rule rface ester Treatment Rule;l "� f, Applicable Parameters Giardia lambfia cysts • Enteric Viruses • Le+gionella • "ILrbidity • Heterotrophic Bacteria Filtered Surface Water Supplies Non-Filtered Surface Water Supplies 1.Filter effluent turbidity<_0.5 NTU in 95% 1.Turbidity S.5 NTU at all times of monthly samples 2.Raw water total conform<_100/100ml or fecal 2.Disinfectant residual?0.2mg/Iin95%ofmonthly coliform<20/100mlas annual geometric mean samples collected from the distribution system 3.Annual watershed control program and sanitary 3.Disinfectant residual i 0.2 mg/1 at all times survey report to states leaving plant 4.Disinfectant residual>0.2 mg/1 in 95'i of monthly 4.Filtration+disinfection treatment must provide samples collected from the distribution system removal/inactivation of: 5.Disinfectant residual>0.2mg mg/I at all times leaving plant • 99.9 % Giardia lambfia cysts 6.Disinfection treatment must provide minimum • 99.99% Enteric Viruses inactivation of: • 99.9% Giardia lambfia cysts • 99.99% Enteric Viruses % l • i:r Proposed Rule Corrosion Control Trees meat Applicable Parameters Copper and Lead Determination of need for corrosion control Determination of need for public education treatment implementation or modification program to be implemented by the water utility 1.Worst-case monitoring at residents'kitchen tap for 1.Worst-case monitoring at residents'kitchen tap for • overnight samples overnight samples 2.Sampling is to be done quarterly 2.Sampling is to he done quarterly 3."No Action"levels for treatment 3."No Action"levels for public education: •pH>_S.0 in 95%of samples •Pb S 10 ug/1 as an average Pb<_.10 ug/I as an average •Pb<_20 ug/l in 95$of samples •Cu<_1.3 mg/I in 95%of samples 4.If a"No Action"level is exceeded,a public education 4.If a"No Action"level is exceeded,the utility must program must be approved by the state and the investigate,implement,and demonstrate optimal utility must demonstrate the program effectiveness corrosion control treatment for control of lead each year dissolution LEN C. RODMAN, P.E. • .,sus Prows(M.m.11;1•r 31aC'rC S VIeatCr7 Eniineen•Arthitectt 1.1•1\Iralwlls,Low r.l,Lo ie • ..\.111•.1.I IV.\i1..,•ul.r 64114 'r111 Ii•1.`INNl,,11:1 ./\\an AWWA —� - C� M D monthly report on the questions. issues.and policies /1ashington[ Shaping our Industry Jlu %.---) ydame26. Nwber f danualy1991 EPA promulgates final Phase II Rule The US Environmental January press conference. primarily in the Midwest and • Senators tackle Protection Agency promul- USEPAotficialsbelievethe California.The synthetic or- gated final standards for 33 pesticidesinPhasellarefound See Phase II.page 2 risk assessment contaminants and reproposed standards for another five See page 2 under the Phase II Rule. New MCLs for Phase II contaminants Included in the final Phase Contaminant Promulgated MC1. • If list—which covers inor- Irra4anics 27 contaminants ganic and synthetic organic Asbesm, 7 million fi&r81 ier mgA. added to DWPL chemicals—are 17 pesticides �tum Oo m and 13 probable carcinogens. Five contaminants were Mercury 0.1112mut See page 3 Ni 100mg/L dropped from the nile,which Nitrite 10me.L was proposed in May 1989, Teal Ninth and Nitrite 10.0 mg/L • Office of Water and new proposed maximum Soloman 0.05mc/L contaminant levels(MCLs) Organics • reorganization for barium.aldicarb,aldicarb oTchlomhelnme Obmg/L if sulfoxide,aldicarb sulfonc, eis-l2-Dichlamerhylene 0O7mel. See page 4 and pentachlomphennl were vans-l2-Dichinnrmylene mulL 1 2-Dxhromemykre Only mg/L to he published in January in Ehythenzene 07mgit the Federal Register: Mom hlombenzere 0.1 mg/L. Editor "This is a quantum leap in Stymy 01 mg/L Tomm Holmes - Tevad+I thykne 0.105mpp, Y monitoring requirements," Toluene 10mo/L Managing Editor said Jack Sullivan.AWWA Xytenes 10Omg/l, Judi Buehrer deputy executive director for ltstkides and PCBs Typesetter government affairs. Alachhx 0.002 inert. Bill Shanahan USEPA estimates 3,3(Xlof Amour 0.1XDmUL the nation's 80.(X1O drinking Canrnhxan Otamg/L ldaExecutive Director water systems will have to 0 O ,ehlaopr"panelDBCP1 O.t 102 mc/L John B.Marmon treat their water to control one Z,-D 0.07 mu/I. Deputy Executive Director or more of the Phase II con- Ethylene dihmnide 1EDBI O.txxosmejl. for Government Affairs taminants.The regulations Hepachlrr olxttan,izt John H Sullivan will he effective in July 1992. Heptachlor epoxide 01x112 mist. londane O01102 m1:ll. Director of Publications Such action.USEPA pro- N thenrihla 11 W mc1 Norm Utlevnz jests,will cost systems S88 Rafychlonrai d biphenyls million annually, with $fv4 1PCBs1 o.lxrtsnryiL AWWA Officers million for treatment and$24 T""apir"" otos rout Frederick H Elwell President 2.43-TPISihesl 0115 me/L Million for monitoring. J Edward Singley.President-Elect Treatment Techni Foster S Burba.Vice-President Agency otTicialshelieve states st"el w III have to spendabout$17 Aenlamide 00115C dosed at I nig�L Harold E Settler.immediateIrri Eplchlumhydnn 001`N dined at 7.0 cost. Past-President million annually to implement Archie Becher.Treasurer the regulations. Reproposed MICIs John B.Mannion.Secretary Households in areas af- Contaminant Repropuved Presioush Puthhea by MCI, Preptned X1(1. Amxncan wafer wo"sA<soaauoa totted by the reeulauons toll Id tie w:+ter increase from Ranum 2O mgL Sill mg/L.. Government Aea„<CMG? Ahlr:tT 01107 melt. 1101 m_.1 1010 Vermont Ave N YJ Selo 810 s 10 to t r billsl year,said Hike Akl trwdloxtric Ofxll m 1 trill n+v t Wasmnamn DC 23305 i2o2`628 8303 W Cuuv^9^i '99,by vex Amen can water Catk.director of the agency's Aldn:ufi.ullrr lilrlr myt 01ume;L Woa5 Answ.ai�on Office 111 Drinking W:I(er,at a Nm.rhkrnphnv+l lilall med. II rnr:L ..-/ —l r Phase II Rule continued from page 1 • '•U I[i] came dtenu,al..u:m,,.t likely ties.inhan tenter. L`gis/iitu�iLJI p At We press a mode'“:l',Rik scud.-1\e think diatom rally„till the new \ICI.,on re:suetde,there is,going to be,ui mciee.ed nnpgun,tit txflinun pies gluon .a touch mare rarclul use tit Lead contamination Introduction tit kgl,kuion Call( pesticide..It'.po„ihte there will h•vane additional ix•,tiade> he a hannurter of congressional taken tilt the market. expected in new bill senuntcnt:rod trcite s.rnrn though "And wc tealready seen rcne wed or new'merest in some places Congressional action on lead only a inaction of the hills intro- in working on tx,iluuun pre,cation in agricultural:urea,.Al.i.by contanunauon of the environment duced goner up for a ILxrr vwe. has Mg regulators staixlardk in place.we,gne a dear target to could surface again io February in Some of the eny'nnntental leg- deliberations of the pesticides pmerant when ihet re toutg to the Senate. islation intnxtuced and the spoil- decide on future registration or reie_•nstration tit ix•sticitten and A spokesman for Sen. Harry son are tiring to calculate whether or nut has mg that Ixwcxlc,_et into Reid.D-Nev..said in late January • H.R.45—Project licautilica- groundwliter is likely to to a public health concern legislation similar to the final font tioit Act.Rep.Charles Benner.0- of a previous lead bill would he Fla,.would enable the Secretars nit Senators review risk assessment introduced soon. and hearings the Arms to enter into agreements • could start in February. concerning the reconstmdion of Several members of the Senate Committee on Enciron- Reid Introduced a bill in the last hinds adversely'affected by water ment and Public Works endorsed"Reducing Rink:Setting session of Congress addressing resources projects. Priorities and Strategies for Env mum iental Protection-at a lead in several media.A provision . H.R.67—Depwlment of En- recent heating on the report. to mandate maximum contaminant vironntental Protection Act.Rep. The US Env inuniental Protection Agency's Science Ad- kvels(MCLsl for drinking water:t Sherwood Boehlen.R-N.Y..would usury Board issued the report in September.It recom- the consumer's tap was later establish a Department of Env iron- mended that USEPA target its efforts on the basis of stripped from the bill. mental Protection. opportunities for the greatest risk reduction. • H.R.137—Research Project USEPA Administrator William Reilly.who requested the Water-related bills on Enhanced Evaporaunn in the Senate hearing on the report.said he had asked agency introduced in Congress Salton Sea Area of Southern Cali- officials to incorporate relative risk"within the constraints Although preoccupied with the fomia. Rep. Al McCandless. R- of legal obligations and statutory requirements-in the tint- PersianGutf war.membersofCon- Calif..would establish a research year plans they are drawing up. gress have found time to introduce project in the Salton Sea area con- Reilly told the comrriinee it ts not clearhow relativensk- environmemal and water-related coming an enhanced evaporation hued policy should he applied.He added."I do not see it as legislation. system for saline water. our function to insist that science priorities control the \ interests of the country."He explained that when public perception differs from that of science,the government's task is to inform the public of those perceptions. Reorganization of Board members questioned Sen.John Chaffer.R-R.1.,ranking Republican on the g u Prothro about several issues re- committee.questioned Reilly abut xi erethe administraxx Water Office dated to the reorganization. She differed with it.Reilly replied."I do not have a sense that we expected by April 20 said it would affcct resource levels. need to change our structure of government org notations," and recent USEPA budgets inch- adding Mat this was a mild difference. Apnl 20 is the target date for cute a gradual growth in the Office Sen.Robert Smith.R-N.H.,a newcomer to the Senate, reorganization of the Office of of Water.particularly in wetlands asked Reilly if he could compose a"dream sheet"of legis- Water at the US EnvironmentalntProtectionA•enc anaenc of- and llienheofze.chain lation he would like m see. Reilly responded that it is Agency. agency WifliamGl:vc.chainnanulthe important to gine the primsads hied in-Reducing Risk" hei:d odd the Science Advisory' SAB drinking water cotnnuttee. airing without regard tic immediate legislation. Board Executive Committee in a said he was concerned this the Senora senators who agreed with the premise hhind the Washington meeting. agency was"disrnand inin its mi- SAB report en pfia,ved the gap het"ten science and public Martha Prothro.director of the crobtukn_v capabilities in the rear- opinion.Sen.Howard Stevenhmnn.D-Ohio.que,uoned Office of Water Regulations and ganv;uhn and the emphasis urn the amount of data an citable coneenung exposure and cer- Standards. said USEPA regxxtal cancer risks. lain ens nnnmenedcontaminants. offices are"reacting very favor-Prothro said the office has a Sen H.un Reid.D.Nen Ala.said."The public perception ably'tin the siserhaul stnall slat(o(scistruists and techni- of risk and actual n.k are not ssnunntous."Sen.Steve "Wye do have some employees cal peoaple:md that the wore:nva- Ssnuns.R-Idaho.Cntictted Congress for its"habit of re- whit are Me entirely pleased.but non would bring them together. spending to perception of risk rather than actual ask." by and large.it s going quite well." USF.P:\plans to recruit more sci- Onadissenting,note.Sen.Dan id Durenberger.RNI inn., she said of rrxc:untatnn efforts. enlists and technical paiple,she sand."We eion.1 know enough to r.onk asks There is no Some w;uer office staff members. sand. • 'sardsunk.in comp.ire the toxic threat of one contaminant she smut are concealed that oppor- Pie water program as nx,cmg nersu,the cancer du eat CO;lilt lhen.- tuitiue,tic personal ad,augment nnnard eoutibonne ddlereut vue•r- He nnedoutthere xtassiensaretainelslint priority nrnhehttutedunderthenewplan. p' report P e.hi l'rothm sand.It dues nw lust to ern;unlw.ae'pnotet urn i.w hit:die puhhc assign.it a high its htch condenses seecn"'tikes w rite regulations but must also iprinnn into tour. i See reorganuand'n deal w id,issues suchasnonlxanu { chart.pang,:J.t wxnrcc pollution. 2 AWWA Washington Report January 1991 USEPA Phase II Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations On January 30,1991,USEPA published in the Federal Register final national primary drinking water regulations for 10 volatile organic contaminants(VOCs),16 synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs),and 7 inorganic chemicals(IOCs). The total regulatory package includes: • Maximum contaminant level goals(MCLGs)for 10 VOCs,16 SOCs,and 7 10Cs. • Maximum contaminant levels(MCLs)for 10 VOCs,16 SOCs,and 71OCs. • Treatment technique requirements for two SOCs. • Monitoring,reporting,and public notification requirements. • Best available technologies(BAT)for contaminant removal upon which the MCLs are based. • Monitoring requirements for 30 unregulated contaminants. • Secondary MCLs(SMCLs)for two contaminants. In addition,USEPA has proposed revisions to the monitoring requirements for the current 8 Phase 1 VOCs to synchronize requirements with the 33 compounds.MCLGs and MCLs for four SOCs and one IOC have been reproposed. The following summarizes the proposed requirements: I. MCLGs and MCLs 1. Table 1(Section 2)lists the MCLGs and MCLs. 2. The MCLGs and MCLs for barium,aldicarb,aldicarb sulfone,aldicarb sulfoxide,and pentachlorophenol are reproposed.Final levels will be established by July 1991. 3. The MCLs for barium,chromium,selenium,and 2,4,5-TP(Silvex)have increased. 4. The MCLs for cadmium,2,4-D,methoxychlor,toxaphene,and lindane have decreased. 5. The final 33 MCLs take effect in July 1992,and the 5 reproposed MCLs are expected to take effect by January 1993. II. Treatment Techniques 1. Treatment techniques are set for acrylamide and epichlorohydrin due to lack of reliable analytical methods. 2. These compounds are impurities found in water treatment chemicals such as coagulant aids. 3. Each public water system must certify annually that these chemicals do not exceed specified levels based on dosage and percentage of the compound in a coagulant aid or other water treatment chemical.Certifications can rely on manufacturers or third parties,as approved by the state. III. Monitoring 1. Table 2(Section 2)summarizes the monitoring requirements. 2. Vulnerability assessments,conducted by the system in accordance with state criteria,can be used to apply for reduced frequency of monitoring for asbestos and the SOCs. 3. Assessments are intended to determine the likelihood that a water system might be subject to contamination from asbestos,pesticides,or other SOCs. 4. Vulnerability assessments are approved by the state. 5. Monitoring frequency also varies depending on system size,source water,and if contaminants are detected in the initial sampling. 6. For nitrate and nitrite,monitoring frequency depends on the percentage of contaminant detected as compared to the MCL. 7. Samples for nitrate,nitrite,herbicides,pesticides,and PCBs must be taken regularly so that periods of likely contamination are not avoided. 8. The initial round of sampling must be completed according to the following schedule (3/6/9 cycle): First nine-year compliance cycle—Jan.1,1993 to Dec.31,2001 First three-year cycle—Jan.1,1993 to Dec.31,1995(Initial monitoring period) Second three-year cycle—Jan.1,1996 to Dec.31,1998 Third three-year cycle—Jan.1,1999 to Dec.31,2001 IV. Best Available Technology 1. Table 3(Section 2)lists the BAT for removal of each contaminant as determined by USEPA. 2. In order to qualify for a variance,a water system must demonstrate that it could not comply with an MCL despite use of the BAT. V. Compliance 1. For systems monitoring quarterly,or more frequently,compliance is based on an annual running average for each sample point. 2. For systems monitoring annually,or less frequently,compliance is based on a single sample unless the state requests a confirmation sample. 3. For nitrate and nitrite,if the first sample exceeds the MCL,another sample must be taken within 24 hours.Compliance is based on the average of the two samples. VI. Public Notification 1. Public notice will be required for violation of MCLs,treatment techniques,monitoring and reporting requirements,and to inform the public about a variance or exemption. 2. The proposed regulation contains standard health effects language for each of the contaminants.This language must be used for public notification. VII. SMCLs 1. 'Fable 4(Section 2)lists the proposed SMCLs. 2. SMCLs relate to aesthetic effects and are not enforceable by USEPA. 3. The SMCLs for the organic chemicals are lower than their respective MCLs because they cause tastes or odors in water at these lower levels. VIII. Unregulated Contaminants 1. Table 5(Section 2)lists the 30 unregulated contaminants and their analytical methods. 2. Monitoring for the 30 contaminants will be determined by a vulnerability assessment conducted by the system in accordance with state criteria. 3. If a water system has to monitor,it must be completed within the first monitoring period (Jan.I,1993 to Dec.31,1995). • 4 American Water Works Association ! 6666 West QuincyAvenue i Denver,CO 80235 (303)7 1 94 77 t DRAFT MINNESOTA RIVER BLUFFS STUDY April 10, 1991 PURPOSE OF MINNESOTA RIVER BLUFFS STUDY The purpose of the Minnesota River Bluffs study is to determine how much and which land should be preserved and to recommend development strategies which would preserve the physical nature and visual character of the bluff and surrounding area. To accomplish this,existing and natural conditions should be analyzed. This will become the basis for determining which land should be preserved. Then,alternative development strategies for the preservation of the bluff should be examined. From these strategies, a course of action for the preservation of the Minnesota River bluff will be recommended. STAFF RECOMMENDATION$ The staff recommends that a bluff ordinance with setbacks be developed. This would be the most effective way to protect the bluffs since developers would be required to prove a hardship condition in order to be granted relief from the ordinance. Variances from the bluff ordinance could be considered if it results in a better site plan. This would afford the developer flexibility in the siting of units while achieving the same density permitted by ordinance,while the City, in return, would get maximum bluff protection. BACKGROUND A goal of the 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan was to identify and designate all environmentally sensitive or critical areas and establish development restrictions and policies for public and private management of natural resources. The City has actively worked towards preservation of sensitive slopes in the review of development proposals. Land has either been acquired or set aside in perpetual easements to the City covering the bluffs area. As a policy,the City has encouraged lower density development with homes set back from the edge of the bluff. Additional study of the Minnesota River Bluffs in Eden Prairie would help identify what is left to be preserved and the current tools available to accomplish this. This study would be a way of implementing the original goal in the 1968 Comprehensive Guide Plan while also relating to the Minnesota River Valley Refuge Area. The bluffs along the Minnesota River in Eden Prairie contain a number of natural functions that make them valuable resources to the community. The bluff is a distinct element along the Minnesota River Valley and composed entirely of highly erodible sandy soils which are difficult to control and revegetate once disturbed. The bluffs provide a transition between the Minnesota River Valley and the adjacent developed portions. The bluff provides a refuge for wildlife especially during periods of high water and provides screening for larger animal and forest species. The south facing bluffs,in particular,are a favorite wintering habitat for deer. "7",-.".,:..*-cl. ';:i W. , 1FWAI Pi • , "1 1 t,V1 I-inti r -,.. 4 „.._ .. .. ,. .. 741, 07 In i." a1 • px' • ';man ettli V P° I"' fir, , y /�I'�s r• 1-j . !I .. ;6 1,, jilt L yl j k c..,,,_ 1.- �lillaf�nl i A� ,sue �` � 4 i. kit: .►�_ != � s �CEL'�,� < ��l as r ""illiblPili `fix i. rrt� 7 Wig..>� /� .�*�1 a ��� r ii Pry s, i ,ti �,t �u 4, �•1 <t�: �/ f e... �. ' iirc� �,4 '�'. lidtm Fzis. —0 .sue, -;�: _i ail— `. —i�+l/ I ll =.-�`4A.mtt1 „, >..4o ff, " ilirg ���' P:r4 - — b. ..„ ., ) 1/4. Thar , , frontiv.wistczmitit.t,cN—,...4•10,..:1. 111 <2,411 .51011Pk ,410-4 • 9— i ..,-.'‘'+‘..,.,,.5A1V.::40,1,-- -ft,,y4i-,74."7.4''.-.:'eAll %--17:;-D' i"li'l "L)f ,�_ 151V5Iil 'fie .� _ fi vi ;---N- .17A m I li I wp r 4 i i MP I rl jlatil i 11111 I i S7 111140 All PI -',„•/.14"'",.-.4z.,,,'- .4r..4,:,-,:„. lsom . • ,M1111 � • o=- t; N,..T!1 .I _ - — . „,zeiuhro.,,,,u-a... -ic� -ii�ii/,,/ 411 1si,sillrr,,,,,,, rr1 <w _z �/ / , �.. , _ e , „ ,. 2 BLUFF 4 3 Bluff Sector Location THE BLUFF STUDY • The bluff also is a display of remnants of prairie plant communities and hillside forest which once occurred in thiourea. Maintaining plant communities is essential since these communities have naturally adapted their sites effectively to stabilize the fragile soils of the bluff and absorb much of the noise,glare and pollutants produced adjacent to the valley. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS The most critical question facing the City as developments along the bluff are being reviewed is: how much and which land should be preserved? The bluff area presents a wide variety of visual conditions. The most critical characteristics are found in a relatively narrow space on a 100-120'vertical slope adjacent to the Minnesota River. Criteria which should be utilized as the basis for recommending how much and which land should be preserved are: 1. Topography 2. Vegetation 3. Soils 4. Land uses 5. Wildlife Topography The Minnesota River bluff in Eden Prairie ranges in elevation from approximately 700'to 840' above mean sea level. However, for the most part,the bluff lies between elevation of 720 and 830 feet. The variation in elevation of the bluff is due to the various effects of erosion and proximity of glacial deposits. The Hennepin County Soils survey describes the Minnesota River bluff as steep slopes between 12% and 35%. Steep slopes and embankments are difficult to stabilize with vegetative practices. Gullies develop easily. Increased runoff from development from roofs and streets can cause severe erosion. Vegetation The vegetative cover of the Minnesota River bluff in Eden Prairie is approximately 60% grassland with scattered trees, mainly cedar and upland woodlands. The present woodland association along the bluff has developed relatively recently. The oak savannah is closely associated with prairie vegetation. The open grassland and tree cover of the bluff is related to the bluff character and is a very important characteristic. A detailed tree and prairie grass inventory of the Minnesota River bluff in Eden Prairie has not been completed. As each development is reviewed adjacent to the bluff area,the City ordinance would require a detailed tree inventory. Since 60%of the bluff is prairie vegetation,a grassland inventory is important. Although the Hennepin County Soils survey indicates the bluff soils as excellent for growing dry site pines(such as white pine, red pine,Scotch pine),the amount of evergreens in any reforestation in a wooded area project should be limited with preference to deciduous trees which are more representative of the mature oak cover. The use of evergreen trees should be limited in areas where year round foliage would be of a functional use for screening purposes. Sugar maple,red oak,basswood, hackberry, walnut, black cherry, white ash would be tree species suitable for planting in the bluff areas. If natural prairie grass is disturbed, the area should be restored with native prairie grasses. Bluff soils are generally rated as a low value for wildlife habitat for pheasants,squirrels,rabbits, ducks,minks,muskrats,and deer by the U.S.Soil and Water Conservation Service. However, the adjoining bottom lands of the Minnesota River Valley are rated very high. The bluff does provide added variety and the bottom land habitat. The bluff provides refuge for bottom land species during times of flooding. The bluff woodland areas provide substantial tree cover for birds to utilize the bluff plus the adjacent bottom lands and uplands. Soils The principle soil types along the Minnesota River bluffs are salida soils. Salida soils are deep, sandy soils with slopes ranging from 12-35%with a dominant slope in excess of 18%. Although the soils are well suited to permanent vegetation,particular dry site pines,they are poorly suited to lawn areas and present a difficulty in reestablishing vegetation after they are severely disturbed. Reforestation is essential where the bluff has been disturbed by either development or tree injury and disease. Reforestation would require the introduction of organic material to help increase soil moisture and will likely require artificial irrigation to assist young transplanted trees until they are established. Erosion is a hazard along the bluff. The salida soils are non-cohesive and easily eroded. Increased runoff rates pose a particular problem in that a previously stable slope can easily be gullied by concentrated runoff from roofs and paved surfaces. Construction activities also pose a threat to the stability of the bluff when surface cover is moved. Salida soils have rapid permeability. This, combined with steep slopes, presents a severe pollution hazard where on-site septic systems occur. It should be required that bluff property which have sewer availability connect to this system. This is important in order to minimize pollution of the Minnesota River Valley Wildlife Refuge Area. It would be beneficial to require that post-development run-off rates and volumes over the bluff be equal to or less than predevelopment rates. This will assure that erosive run-off will be built into projects. On-site storm water collection and detention, diversion and energy absorbing devices are needed to minimize bluff erosion. To avoid construction erosion, erosion control, careful grading,proper maintenance should be required. EXISTING LAND USE Single family residential land uses are the dominant existing land use along the top of the Minnesota River bluff in Eden Prairie. The bluff features which are of value to homeowners are also the features of which the bluff preservation relies,therefore,single family residential could be consistent with bluff preservation. Another portion of the bluff area is used for airport purposes. Airport expansion should not encroach into the bluff area. PROPOSED LAND USE The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates future land uses throughout the community. Along the Minnesota River bluff, the guide plan depicts primarily low density residential,open space and airports. WILDLIFE Bluff soils are generally rated as low value for wildlife habitat for pheasants,squirrels,rabbits, ducks,minks,muskrats and deer by the U. S.Soil and Water Conservation Service;however, the adjoining bottomlands of the Minnesota River Valley are rated very high. The bluff provides additional variety from the bottomland habitat. The bluff provides refuge for bottomland species during times of flooding. The bluff woodland areas also provide some substantial tree cover for birds to utilize the bluff plus the adjacent bottomlands and uplands. THE BLUFF PRESERVATION AREA The inventory and analysis section suggests that the steeply sloped, sandy soil area between elevation of 700-840 should be preserved. This is an area where alteration of the slopes and vegetation disturb the visual character of the bluff,lead to severe erosion,and destroy the bluff itself. The sketch on the following page is a typical section of the Minnesota River bluff. The maps on the subsequent pages indicate the area which should be preserved. Within this area,a detailed tree and grassland inventory and topographic analysis should be required to more accurately determine location of the area to be preserved on a site by site basis. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE MINNESOTA RIVER BLUFFS A plan for preservation of the river bluff must protect the slopes and enhance the visual character of the bluff. Design guidelines should be developed which emphasis the visual character of the bluff including height,texture,colors,and landscaping. Height Tall buildings would be out of character with the horizontal nature of the bluff. There are several ways of addressing height. 1. Limit building height to 40'. (This is the maximum height permitted in single family zoning districts.) Any additional height above this mark could be mitigated with plant material and increased setback from the rim of the bluff. 2. Although the code would permit a maximum height of 40',buildings which occur on the bluff could incorporate components of varying scale which reflect the varying scale of trees on the bluff but no taller than the maximum allowed by code. 3. Building heights could be kept below the canopy of the trees or the code maximum, whichever is less. 4. Buildings could be terraced, blending into the topography. Texture The Minnesota River bluff is characterized by strong horizontal lines and a vertical tree canopy. These elements are found throughout the entire length of the bluff. The horizontal nature of the bluff should be emphasized with horizontal textures. Colors Buildings which occur on the bluff should reflect bluff colors or earthtones. Buildings would blend into the natural colors of the landscape and emphasize more of the bluff colors. Landscaping Landscaping can enhance the character of the bluff especially where indigenous species are used. Reforestation and/or mass plantings of trees can offset the building mass and height of structures proposed. The intent of landscaping would not be to screen buildings on the bluff from the view below,however,landscaping could be used to complement the bluff and blend buildings into the surrounding landscape. High retaining walls on the downside of buildings should be avoided. Design guidelines should be flexible enough to allow alternatives. The final design could be a product of the site features since guidelines may not have uniform applicability in every situation. For example,low profile homes emphasize the horizontal nature of the bluff;however,two story homes may be acceptable with the greater bluff setback or if natural vegetation or topography softens the overall height. BLUFF DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS There are a number of alternatives which could protect and preserve the character of the bluff. These include, but not be limited to,additional slope and erosion regulations,a bluff protection overlay district, historic preservation designation, height and setback restrictions, transfer of development rights, PUD density transfers, scenic or conservation easements, or acquisition. 1. Sloped Ground Review (Existing Ordinance) The sloped ground ordinance does not prohibit development on slopes over 12%. The ordinance evaluates impacts and prescribes mitigation. Practical experience has shown that developers cannot always be relied to strictly follow approved plans. Additional sloped ground regulations such as prohibiting development on slopes in excess of 18% could preserve the bluff. Considering the erosive nature of the soils and the difficulty of establishing ground cover,development of the bluffs is best served if no alteration is permitted. 2. Bluff Protection Overlay District A bluff protection overlay district with setbacks would be similar to the shoreland ordinance and floodplain ordinance. A bluff protection overlay district may prescribe land use limitations, intensity, setbacks, etc. in addition to standard zoning regulations to protect the bluff. Establishing a bluff overlay district would make the evaluation of the bluff impacts more objective. Though less flexible than guidelines,the City would predetermine in advance where and what type of development could be permitted near the bluff. 3. Historic Preservation Designation The City recently has created a Historic Preservation Commission. One of the responsibilities of the Commission would be to recommend to the City land areas that should be designated as historic. The bluff could be designated an historic area. Money would be available through the State and Federal agencies to acquire property, or this property could just be designated as historic sites with specific regulations developed for that district. 4. Height and Setback Restrictions Land is already regulated for height and setbacks by City code. The DNR is considering additional shoreland restrictions which establish a bluff impact zone. In this area, building setbacks must be 50' from the rim and a 30' maximum height. The City of Eden Prairie will be expected to adopt these restrictions. These restrictions are likely to protect the bluff,however, it may limit site plan flexibility. 5. Transfer of Development Rights The Southwest Crossing PUD proposed a transfer of development rights which shifted intensity out of the environmentally sensitive east end of the project to the western end of the site adjacent to I-494. In consideration for taller buildings and higher floor area ratios,the City Council required that the developers record restrictive covenants on the land which limited future development potential. This protected the City in the event the property was sold to another individual. Transfer of development rights may have potential in the bluff area. Density of the bluff area could be transferred from the bluff area to other sites that developers own. 6. Planned Unit Development Density Transfers This practice has been most commonly used throughout Eden Prairie to encourage better site plans and preservation of natural features. This has been used effectively to preserve wetland areas, creeks, woodland areas and lakes. It allows the developers flexibility in terms of the siting of the buildings while achieving the same density allowed by Code, and the City is able to preserve unique natural features. 7. Scenic or Conservation Easements Where natural features are designated by the City to be preserved but the land is not proposed to be dedicated or the City is unable to purchase the property, scenic or conservation easements are used. Conservation easements are granted to the City in perpetuity and generally prohibit alternation of natural features. 8. Acquisition The subdivision regulations permit the City to require up to 10%of the land area to be dedicated. On many parcels adjacent to the bluff,a 10% land dedication is not adequate enough to cover all the bluff area. In those situations,land acquisition may be necessary. Considering budget restrictions and cutbacks from the State legislature,acquisition may not be viable. RECOMMENDATIONS The Minnesota River bluff is an unique and valuable resource. Eden Prairie has always been concerned about the impact of development on the natural environment. The purpose of a bluff preservation and protection is to protect and preserve this unique natural feature by encouraging the careful and knowledgeable development along the Minnesota River bluffs. Bluff preservation should be an incentive for developers to design sites in a way which would preserve the bluff. This may include density transfers,alternative land uses and different site plans. A detailed tree inventory and a topographical base map are two key tools that are needed to evaluate the impacts of development of the Minnesota River bluff. The purpose of these inventories are to indicate to developers the importance of using existing vegetation and minimizing grading to develop better site plans while instilling sensitivity toward the preservation of the bluff early in the design process. Bluff regulations must identify areas to be preserved. The bluff is relatively narrow vertical slope approximately 100-120' in height adjacent to the Minnesota River. To help define the preservation area more clearly,an analysis was made of topography,vegetation,and soils. This analysis suggests that no development should occur on slopes in excess of 18%. This is important since erosion is a hazard for salida soils along the bluff. The soils are non-cohesive, easily eroded and extremely difficult to reestablish vegetation. To protect the physical characteristics of the bluff, it is important to develop specific erosion control and storm water runoff standards. Post-development runoff rates and volumes over the bluff should be equal to or less than predevelopment rates. This will assure that the erosive runoff will not be built into projects. In addition,on-site storm water collection and detention basins,diversion swales and energy absorbing devices are needed to minimize bluff erosion. To avoid construction erosion,erosion control and careful grading with proper maintenance should be required for all projects. In addition to site development impacting the physical character of the bluff,adjacent land uses will also have a significant impact. Large industrial or office buildings,commercial areas,would detract from the horizontal nature of the bluff. Residential land use are the most appropriate use along the bluff because of the size of the houses and the density which would allow more of the natural site features to remain. A bluff setback is necessary for structures to minimize the visual intrusion of the bluff. A reasonable setback would be 50' to top of the bluff. This would be the same as a new DNR bluff setback. Regulating development adjacent to the bluff is as important as the preservation of the bluff itself. Large physical structures can dominate the horizontal nature. Existing land uses would remain; however, new uses should be subject to additional evaluational criteria to justify any visual alteration and encroachment. Design guidelines,as suggested earlier in this report,would emphasize the visual character of the bluff including height, texture,colors and landscaping. The bluff area is very extensive and would be difficult for the City to purchase or acquire entirely through dedication. The City should consider adopting a bluff ordinance with setbacks and use the PUD process(which would allow the developer the same density allowed by Code) a site plan which cluster density away from the bluff while preserving the natural character. The bluff area could then be dedicated to the City or set aside in a perpetual conservation easement. Density transfer variances from the normal zoning requirements are likely,but these would be desirable tradeoffs in exchange for the preservation of the bluff. The staff would recommend the following: 1. Adopt a bluff ordinance with setbacks. Require developers to use density transfers and alternative site plans to preserve the bluff. Tree inventories and topographic analysis is required early in the review process. 2. Prohibit development or land alteration on slopes in excess of 18%. 3. Develop specific erosion control and storm water runoff standards. 4. Establish a 50'setback for structures from the rim of the bluff. 5. Develop architectural and site development guidelines to minimize impact of land uses adjacent to the bluff. • ATTACHMENT A MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ACT In 1976, the Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge Act was enacted. This act declared the policy of Congress would be to preserve the Minnesota River and establish 9500 acres for the Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge and another 8000 acres of wildlife recreation area adjacent to the refuge. The 1980 Comprehensive Plan for the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge contains recommendations for counties and municipalities adjacent to the valley area. These would include: 1. To identify the Minnesota River bluffs in Comprehensive Plans noting areas of steep slopes(12-18%);very steep slopes(greater than 18%);and areas of moderate,high and extremely high erosion potential. Policies should be adopted for planning and management. 2. Encourage a setback from the bluff edge sufficient to reduce erosion potential and to promote aesthetics. 3. Require dedication of bluff lands for conservation purposes as part of regulating subdivision of land. 4. Encourage the use of earth tones in construction and coloring of bluff top structures. 5. Adopt a Bluffs Management Overlay ordinance to supplement existing zoning ordinances and to effectuate the objective and performance standards for protection of the river bluffs. 6. Investigate the possible uses of transfer of development rights compensation for landowners who own bluff property. ®TTACHMENT B HOW DO OTHER COMMUNITIES PROTECT RIV, There are eight major communities adjacent to the Minnesota River within the Minnesota River Valley Wildlife Refuge recreation area. Some of these communities have taken steps to preserve bluff lands within their jurisdiction. In addition, there are other communities throughout the nation that have adopted bluff protection regulations. The city or county and the protective measures they have taken are listed below: Eiggmium The City of Bloomington took several years to complete a study for the protection of bluff areas within the community. Their plan was modeled after a similar study for Cincinnati,Ohio. The plan in Bloomington established a development line of 760 elevation below which development should not occur except for roadways and bridges. The report examined soils,topography,forest characteristic and vegetative cover, wildlife,existing land uses and proposed land uses. The report went on to recommend urban design principles to be used as a guide for the balance of land uses in Bloomington adjacent to the bluffs. Bo*ncvill The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan acknowledges the National Wildlife Refuge. The City has adopted a flood plain ordinance but not a shoreland management ordinance. The majority of the river bluff area is designated Industrial,and no other protective ordinances exist. nha n The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan has designated the Wildlife Refuge area for parks and open space. The City has adopted a flood plain ordinance and shoreland zoning ordinance. Icagska The Park and Open Space portion of the City's Comprehensive Park Plan recognizes the purpose and intent of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge recreation and state trail. The City has adopted a flood plain zoning ordinance but not a shoreland zoning ordinance. City Code requires that all structures be set back a minimum of fifty feet from the edge of a bluff. Eagan The City has adopted a flood plain zoning ordinance but has not adopted a shoreland management ordinance. Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan is designated all land not in public ownership as industrial, and no other protective ordinance exists. Savage The City's Comprehensive Plan recognizes the existence of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Area and state trail and has zoned much of the valley as preservation or open space. Shakopee The City's Comprehensive Plan has designated the entire flood plain within the City as park and open space. The City has not adopted a shoreland management ordinance. Eden Prairie Eden Prairie has a shoreland ordinance and a flood plain ordinance. In addition, the City has a sloped ground ordinance which regulates the use of property and grading on slopes over 12% in a 30'vertical drop,requiring erosion control and mitigative measures. In addition, there is a tree ordinance which limits the amount of trees that can be lost on a parcel of land and requires mitigation for a portion of the tree loss. Eden Prairie has not adopted specific bluff protection regulations. In addition, the State Department of Natural Resources is contemplating revisions to the shoreland management ordinance which would require a fifty foot bluff setback from the rim of the bluff. This regulation will be required to be included in Eden Prairie's current shoreland regulations. • ATTACHMENT C BACKGROUND-FORMATION OF THE MINNESOTA RIVER BLUFF The Minnesota River bluff was formed when mass meltwater from the glacier melted creating Lake Agassiz. This lake covered over 100,000 square miles in Minnesota, North Dakota and Manitoba. The glacier river warren was the outlet of this large lake,and it carved a wide valley, which has now become the Minnesota River Valley. At least four outpourings of the meltwaters down the glacier river warren cut the Minnesota River Valley through a sandy outwash plain. The erosive nature of the flooded river warren was great enough to carve the bedrock near Fort Snelling as much as 75'below the present floodplain. As the Minnesota River began to develop, large volumes of sediment from western Minnesota were deposited in the Lower Minnesota River Valley. The sediments were deposited to a depth of 75',reducing the depth of the Minnesota River Valley by one half. The present day features of the valley began to evolve, with the changing pattern of marshes,lakes, meanders,ox bow lakes and natural levees. From the end of the Glacier Period, the principle forces which affected the development of the landscape were climatic. For the first few thousand years, the climate was cool and a spruce forest predominated. Approximately 7,000 years ago, the climate became more hot and dry. Short prairie grass predominated and erosion of the uplands and eutrophication of wetlands accelerated. About 4,000 years ago,the climate shifted to the present pattern. Most of the bluff area in Eden Prairie was dominated by prairie land; however, within the last 400-500 years, there was an influence of upblend oak trees. Glacial action,water from the river warren,climatic changes created the Minnesota River bluff. The bluff in Eden Prairie is composed of sandy soils steeply sloping at 18-35% with varying heights from 75-125 feet. The predominant tree cover is a mix of vegetations,mostly oak. THE EARLY SETTLERS The first known human habitation of the Minnesota River Valley was in the year 1000 B.C.. In the year 1000 A.D.,evidence of farming and burial mounds were found in this area. Burial mounds were probably built by the Iowas who later were driven away by the Mendekawtandakotas,inferred to as the Dakota or Sioux,which settled along the bluff less than 200 years ago. P I. e C. ' .y it� 5t lle r t. r ' - e..... .;.„-i•..3P Air,: ,,...'•...A, 4.:c‘. lt.t,,, .,..,.:-•‘.f.,' t . ;744r.42d ,,,,,,A. � A.4f:it'q, ' iiiti"2„...„.., ,e. ;.iiin,s..:2,1‘,..1 ifOv*�YpvY T°f�55149$.!�- a�k f� fYy lL'2.1., \'�i��' :1 1rA � I:�i_ itliti j.,,, ia VI 40Lis '1'1- 1- iir ._ . ,may"' ,{ r mil (r,��dd , .I I I 1 r+.',�,;` I,APR C l• 1 '' ■ ..K- / J �•I Cis z ! , �. g A . ,- r iti, ayi I -- — r E :1 i , 177 '' 1 L�',• fit i,,ki, 'S.71 .ti' ` 9t�� • �iA.4. p.i r� gyp (If ` }11 1 F 1 gawp, °T�, l �N iY�� li, v IPP.`r F F 1w I. , ___ I,I. 1 a ant _...., „ ,t,..,, _,,L.,_:, //Nisi/. ► -'' gill "' 1r ////011 _ I//,///jJra�J111.Fi?ii,�I//1!dr111MEW •"4 L-'b..VI�i t4,4AY R l 1, . ) , (1:,,• \ 'NS\..i,, ' '., 1,,,, 1614..... ...= ";,....i li I .,,iii I _}.. _ .-- \ ' BUFF 4 3 • Bluff Sector Location THE BLUFF STUDY „ , , t. -------L.J.,-. ovo. .---- >- 1, (eicLif ,______.,--- — 0 :::. :::„„.....!, ,.. H Oiiiiiffii,::::,/,,..,,,,,;:::: . �c W V. u. ... ...... ................ ....... .. ... ... ..... ,/ c .._ ii. .iiiii!•.':i . ( /2 I.' + T a. edoie f CI) 03 / 0 ) (1. .../..............i.l. ...... .../.......:/„... / e — ..-........_ .... ..... 201•-/} N rl <: , % W` 1- 0 • r / 0 0 r \:cie R \\ 1 ...... .,., Y , r-7-------j. ... i -21-11:A. i '1 ilk -, ..":::::::::::::-::::::::,..::.:.::'_-:,.ZR:::14-...Zi. , :.::: ::::..:;j ` 11 1\ \ ' lj ;::::...."-.:*.:ii--:::.:::;.•':::::::::::.:::::::;:4.::::::::::::;:i.:::::.Z:•Z,::-..::iiy...;... adopt ,....41k,.::::::.. 3 3 ®�/ f o 0 N, .t 0 WOW/ ,.1 ' r------r-T'=';r,7:77F!7.777r7e:i::.':::� '.0,11) : , . / ���� �I�o4o m u :a,vg; , a TT{Tini moninatiromi I iliP4.I r4 iltgr: i( 1 re1 a ii CC i.,6,19.4"....,....a.s. 7 ..e.....:„ i��.am dam �_ item aim won_ .. ..........::::::::: lon, clif ::::::::::::::. (.1 0, . a 18.,„, / :::::: pi aim 0 edo, N h° m tt? / • to to o °� u i„ I. o CO 0 i):i"`::?:i:ii i?:i??ii};i:4:i::4i:is iii?::•:•??::;:f:::•. " • gir 0,1, a T:a \.7"; SI 4... iti'i E, - r z ( UU. . ^y 4 6 t 111: tl31nC 311• kik2,1 OM0111 tr t.t• 44 C IF 1-T c' 41 15 fill - '7.3 .. CO 4 NdP I�y0i A. ng 1 '�,� �a a .N it ,111 ..:.:.... ..f.„,,,„ , .:....„, „.., „ N - t el/N ��Ojj 7 6 ¢ Tilli ¢ ld/ 3LIHSNO 30 !gf1M8 p 3A1 . .i;{{{ Now' ,. n�' 3AI i0 MVO f ...,:.. At tft nrjmtlif_' 1.4,9 `.. ,tip/PtrikvohiatrAr..,mittl, ` `.: :: ® / • a �vo 1 .. KW k ' ( /I Otl ON m I S41' M CI) ii:.i.;;;;;.:**;;;i.':'i'':'i...::::. .1::F:..:,;;i:,;:;:.:;,..,:1..;; ,;;: U. iii /J1 / 0 ( 21) I 'A 1 " am 153 V 41/ -\ : .::.:.....:::::.:::..:........:1 .....L.L..',...::::.:•;:',....::::::::..........::::;..... . / b " 8 v ;; 4:4 . : : . \ ••••... ...•........./ :.. 3w N i Li i., . . .. .. .. . i Si': 1u.:::::: ::u ......::........ Pil ............... .............. .ii:xi :S..... '44µ a» 1 " ROAD m ,-�uifri i, Wp4 (7171. R 4- `O r' rr Tt�i.unigi - >. o 1011 , z gram x , ,;;sw.' 'E0 meow �' I....EL, ; .,::-::::.- .012 ...k .' i tl ira N. 440.1441'"::NT'''''' v .:-..,:::...... 0 .4.,ttlio04':t m • `!!lII, m > Poi�so Qamili ►iiiiiii c r_ ' :'1.... O 1, .:::/ - ./ ... 0 if CO • (j---------.....•:.:•••.::::: :•.'.:.•:::::::::....::•::::: ::::::: :::Fia: •,// i o ..,..?,1 .-r,..,. ir . V rA_ Lia illii o gi=iiii=Usiii: vitistooa\igfil 011...,ilreps aM71 a: =i1 / LL 1111 II. NM qy �, .«. Qt W ON1SSpU31141311NM `4 Al: Watt ,ssa go lirsram• -sr :::::•:::.:•::::••• siml i go — Q. Mail" 4rahliiiiismi ..:-:::...:::, 0 cn �, ' r �� . ::-••ai ,�° n. 011IP*14 I, light . S; °jr r , ,„ .. . 0 .,, 2 Wir Ing.H.lilks .. y°,4 ,, � _ � Hunt S ilk 0% 1d/ 31AINSN 3 teet!t..2 .: �iNW 1O'/J 1 : ,t. •' isiginumw ?it, Fi Q~' • I�S�p� nI N« s:R 6 t4! .,,, 0 ln' 3AIVO .Vo '1 , � r4t:fir' 1.OdM N • -:-.LJ fail%01% •_ *fNacni 11 13.10 IR ` •• •iti t r ! 0: Bb36111 VIZEI 1,4t ! .°, ` eg ' .. -"•• "ktri1 . 0 fp• dav ayr ituna I W.RIVEI - \VIE ,. m raw r \) L_............(:==................ (WOO • 1 ....................: .:...... . ,/ .:,. iiii!,..:ii,.,i!filiii..(ii,!,;/,.::.::i:,:::::.::,::.... a :,iiiiillisisollisiii.ifi.*,Iiraiiiik-:/.:;::;,iiii. u) ,i . 1 ... ............................... ..... .::•,:•:.:„...,..:.•:•:•::•::•:::::::::,:::::. .•.... 17J ) i .. . . .... . . . .. .... . ( -6 I x r R ))"�0 : ca y© e co___i . \..:::::"......•:::::::::::::::::..:". .i../../..::i4.:''...ils.....,,:fg.:...:.:::..,,.,-2::.:...... 1 ~ `~_-.~ / \ _� U �'� / / �-` -�-~ / U .' / > i Vw p' G R... „u timilin'��■`� _ 1 ' ', / rRl F � ':' .Si.:;:;.::::::;::.:1:. ' .F1'.'. I SiPilr.,„, ,t-2't retilm, v,--- u. LL .1° .1.4..\1.'c' #11..111'IT* ...,.....:::::::::.::/. 2,•%010 .= ... La., AA), . tgliir, ,„.. am • ... .......:...............• 11: . ,.... .: • .....:.:.:::::, .. m.„4......: , ............: ...i CO P. 111 • :., . 4.1 n a IS 3 a ,„fr. i ';'i 1.: / h il_r({7_ Ci it' N CO i .. .I3it `�7� Ir U ::.'= • P1 NJ � N.49ro } . 'N Jlryy 31401 0 I I Ili *v III 6 *Ito (.fL �e 0, r _ ° a3Mard..„,,, .....::::::::::. a.. .o.' ' 4" ; ,00,.. , , • .. .. CO • 4-, 400,4, 64 1 I.ui" rf/ A . •.7...aN tli l4 3aINSNO 30 x _ ::::::.: em s 14 ��.- ;" &v s `'; -----1,41ii. '4,-,,-, ,..‘ c' lli 131a AI:, 7 ' �.., I Avila; ,,,,„,uf amt. .vo, , �j l• dNil, ao .ag w �� ,, _...,., 4-.4. f‘ ■.■"j: g .itl 3 • ,,,,,,,,o: ,5.-.Iv emir ar , t ....„.. wymnsummi W.RIVEt�VIt4 L�111111,41® —'----- , t L-..-.. ...._...c........____,........ .S_____..... ,‘,.. .„j............VON 1 ' ?:....1 )'10 i Ill i .113 D i. '.......:. 6 (i)1 . I 4,7 li . ) • • . . .... . - -... . . ,-. . . Fla = Lai 0 xi l'ig' F— :: ..,....: i:i:::.,.....,i;i:i l .--; ,:...:.........., t : ,.i::.',:.:...•,.• I 2 Id IV '...--:,...C::1,:..:,::.',.:.'::•:f":".. 2 a :::i....,.... --i.'".-: :••":-.-'.. I *a . ..•-•:::: -..---..f- _, . • , . . ; u) . ......., .......,::.......:. - .--.--. .,.---- .:::::............. ..-..............................:::..... ; ..... ...........-....:::::: ,.- - . --.-;:,:-...-..'..-.:;., ... . ..................1 , .........:-. ..:.--Si ", .4. ...: • ....... .....-., . ...i ..• ' ! „ . . .... ; . .. . -'. ......,.......................:::::::.,.................. I . .- ..: ..: ... l'..:. .:. 1 - •• -• v., • - . . . ...:....y.• .,. .. .. ...... ....;; ....... .20% ••...:...• . ; ... ••.„ . - mai ...' r\i : ....::. ............,.................. . ......... . : ;: , ;:"..;.::" ... ,..• .....c s • .:. • ..... . . . ... . .. .. . .• . . .. . . -.. ' ............ .... .:Z.. ' S . : ':,. ... ... . . .... . • . . .. . , . . . .. , ... . . ... — . . ..... . . .... .. ..... 21 3 A d V 3 \ C' ' r I- dCO N em• u. :;, s �, • in :. yW a 1t ti. . co 0 N ,-- "'_• - C W t 4 i -1 -- mihtt171/ 1 . , co h a- i E u. i * .2. ovon i I____ ____, ( 1 ' L. c ) 1/ . . . Q Ei i .K ,..t4,,,A-„\-,1 <e-si 1 41 W kittkit..„1„.." . R0tr�6 q� y ,, \ / �. co M tore 11-310 .....W 46 fit• ��'Mop , W �s � W F- l'�; t U'LAN° _ a. / 0 / d co 3 S m C CO V CO i. . ..ter ,........ • o� <t ..,,, ill 5 m .� 4 Ti C C N J `' _ f� r� ♦� �. L{i: YJ t 1 L u N . _ 1 4 1 It Z V a:I-, -11r,,_11/444'6. ./ fi ...,Ui 0.111 imi ,,,., di ..1.73. . Irc ..i. lc, Rik®''... , a„tom u' H ,..L11:11 . :,,,,,, - gib 4 e‘ Ail filo i ... 4.6. 41(tiV , '6 d 44 t iil i AAa, 411,11 !!'1#+ �r t "' l 0,I � 71 f5I+#f r ;•‘11,,. ,,, ..''T2:1/4'''''' ii* , ..s ii ..2.._21, ... ......10h ,. ta b ae x .. x�> /. .• t. s®1 ■�/ �'11 "b . C`* , 4..03 tiEmir41141, .. 1. ilIi1l 'RAW_. -'1 '.' .. / 1/� Arran -'---T----'' '-'-- -1---- - i k M (f) 'CI c M 0. I:13 6b r,,,N ., , 1 •nit I: C _._ 4111Pir i• ' 0 l'). • tg / `,•,.. f ) (1) ZI t I 1 \\ , 70 7.. C 0 "0 ... , \ : I CC , 0 •Q CI 0 ..,. - MINS \ .CI 0 2 .,Y -IQ. I 1 ' H 1 A 11 v 3 \\\\ — ---- 1 1 ' 0 . .. = 1 r--. .. ... ..............a, . . n l_ . ....,........ ., (... c LL CI JLL .„. s earn a W � _ I t c N t 3 g 1 . ,l a O -I 0 cc E O >. V c m 0 v ovoa � 25 .°Ja' k„....01 Q -. w 1-- i iit x `0 i 'p r o J i "au. tei . e=a J.4 MIN rr7, . -wok,41, ' .„ ..... ,z4 4te .. . . -. : ILI -:---; 0 I- IF tie aim At 4, tom AktE � � t� iii s 1 83,ttYd ,` CO 402 . . t // ' t. • art �u \.. . To '':ii x 1.1:4 ..A. 1.. 1eM� .............*: .,�`!� .; ij_^,��' 3.F..• ■ fit.( 4. SAT•■, yi.,+�, GI 0 filril � #sir ' . 1k m rT �,, rilyzy :4� �•. t. 11!-Uhl ..R,,E.�,- -- r �u7 fir .J ..•-. w.('w - .-,..:.:',:g-::ii:',':!..E..01:11riopy ot 1-,., *.iiikiiltAf,..,;„ :.th.sabwk i • ,ie.,::::0i'''''..-..;,::::f!,..::::.****.• •;.4 7 i gcrm .v .-:,.g:tF.,,,vg..,..,05:, _ \ M .. : : V: 17_ �� � a w W co 0 H ��� .� :71Tr"! Ts c w c m ' m a a•,t q *r ;?' +:.:ii. :!:':�':` ?: `.:; is.:'.:i C \--.-i I 0 v 0 a