HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 03/19/1991AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson,
Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and
H. Martin Jessen
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to
the City Manager Craig Dawson, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John
D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger,
Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Robert Lambert, Director of
Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording
Secretary Roberta Wick
TUESDAY MARCH 19, 1991
COUNCILMEMBERS:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting of March 5, 1991.
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Final Plat Approval of Village Knolls (located at the S.E.
Corner of Homeward Hills Road and Silverwood Driver —
Resolution No. 91-60.
C. Resolution No. 91-61 Authorizing Permit Application to MWCC to Allow Connection to MWCC Facilities for the Proposed Village
Knolls Subdivision.
D. Approve Settlement Agreement with the American Fundamentalist
Church for Valley View Road Assessments and Right-of-Way
Acquisition.
E. Release of Special Assessment Agreement 89-04, for the
Construction of Staring Lake Parkway and Twin Lakes Crossing
Through Boulder Pointe.
F. Approve Change Order No. 5 for Mitchell/Research Road
Improvements, I.C. 52-051.
Pg. 512
Pg. 527
Pg. 529
Pg. 532
Pg. 533
Pg. 538
Pg. 541
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
Page Two
G. Approve Change Order No. 2 for Mitchell Road and Sandy
Pointe Addition Improvement, I.C. 52-156 and 72 7 201.
H. Approve Change Order No. 2 for Cedar Ridge Storm Sewer
Improvements, I.C. 52-152.
I. Amoco by Amoco Oil Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 5-91-PUD-2-
91, Zoning District Amendment within the Community Commercial
District; Approval of Developer's Agreement; Adoption of Resolution
91-37, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 5-91-PUD-2-91 and Ordering
Publication; Adoption of Resolution 91-35, Site Plan Review with the
Community Commercial District on 0.8 acres for construction of a gas
station/food shop to be known as Amoco. Location: southeast corner
of Mitchell Road and Martin Drive. (Ordinance 5-91-PUD-2-91, Zoning
District Amendment; Resolution 91-37, Authorizing Summary and
Ordering Publication; Resolution 91-35, Site Plan Review).
J. Outside Storage and Display by City of Eden Prairie. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance 3-91, amending City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.03,
Subdivision 3.J.1. and 2., and by adding a new 4., to clarify
regulations pertaining to outside storage and display in Industrial
and Commercial Districts; Resolution 91-30, Authorizing Summary and
Ordering Publication of Ordinance 3-91. (Ordinance 3-91, Outside
Storage; Resolution 91-30, Authorizing Summary and Ordering
Publication).
P§.- 543
Pg: 546
Pg. 54 •
Pq.55
K. Village Knolls, by Argus Development. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 21- Pg. 55
90, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning District on
8.7 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement; Adoption of Resolution
91-70, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 21-90 and Ordering
Publication; 23 single family lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way
for a residential development. Location: East of Homeward Hills
Road at Silverwood Drive. (Ordinance 21-90, Zoning District
Amendment; Resolution 91-70, Authorizing Summary and Ordering
Publication).
L. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans & Specs for Pg. 56
Bluffs East 8th, Storm Sewer Improvements, I. C. 52-2/3 Resolution
No. 91-67.
M. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans & Specs for
Bluffs West 9th Street and Utility Improvements, I.C. 52-224 ---
Resolution No. 91-69.
N. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans & Specs for
Cedar Ridge Estates 2nd Addition, Street and Utility Tmprovements,
I.C. 52-225 Resolution No. 91-68.
O. A Commendation for Eden Prairie High School Girls Gymnastics Team.
P. Authorization for Hepatitis B Vaccinations.
Q. Approve Plans and Specifications and Order for Bids for Eden Hills
Utility and Street Improvements, —T7C. 52-2177 ResoTaion No7—gf:
71.
Pg. 56
Pg. 56
Pg. 57
Pg. 57
Pg. 57
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
Page Three
I.C. 52-203 (Street and Utility Improvements on Staring Lane
and Ridge Road) Resolution No. 91-62.
B. Cub Foods. Request of Super Valu Stores, Inc. for Zoning District Pg. 576
Change prom R1-22 and PUB to C-Reg-Ser on 9.81 acres with variances
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Site Plan Review on 9.81
acres; Adoption of Resolution 91-39, Preliminary Plat of 11.57 acres
into 1 lot, outlot and road right-of-way for construction of a
73,000 square-foot building to be known as Cub Foods. Location:
Northwest corner of 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive, south of
Leona Road. (Resolution 91-39, Preliminary Plat; Ordinance 6-91,
Zoning District Change.) Continued from February 19, 1991.
C. Timber Lake Drive Townhomes. Request of the Pemtom Company Pg. 610
for Zoning District Amendment within the RM-2.5 Zoning District
on 2.11 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals; Site Plan Review on 2.11 acres for construction of 16
townhouse units in 4 buildings to be known as Timber Lake Drive
Townhomes. Location: Northeast corner of Timber Lake Drive and
Island Road. (Ordinance 8-91, Zoning District Amendment).
D. Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie. Request by Fairview Pg. 620
Hospital and Healthcare Services for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Industrial to Office on 7.3 Acres; Adoption of
Resolution 91-58, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 17.4
acres; Zoning District Change from Rural and 1-2 to Office on 2.9
acres; Site Plan Review on 2.9 acres for construction of a 15,200
square-foot medical health care clinic to be known as Fairview
Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie. Location: East of Prairie
Center Drive and south of Technology Drive. (Resolution 91-58,
Resolution 91-66, PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance 9-91, Zoning
District Change).
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Pg. 638
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
A. Public Discussion of Recommendation of City Hall Site Selection
Subcommittee.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment to Human Rights A Services Commission (1-year term). Pg. 639
Pg.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications 575
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
Page Four
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Legislation Regarding Suburban Hennepin Regional Park
District.
B. Report of City Manager
C. Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
1. Policy on Past Due Rental of Facilities.
D. Report of Public Works Director
1. Approve Layout Plan for CSAH 62 from CSAH 60 to CSAH
S 2-173, Resolution No. 91-63.
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Pg. 640
Pg. 641
TIME:
LOCATION:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
7:30 PM Tuesday, March 5, 1991
City Hall Council Chambers,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris,
H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager, Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning
Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Present: Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean
Harris, H. Martin Jessen, Patricia Pidcock
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the agenda.
Pidcock requested the an addition one item under X.A. Councilmembers
reports: (1) Announcement of Appointment. Jessen requested the
addition of Item (2), Park Reserve Appointments. Anderson requested
the addition of Item (3), Resolution commending the Girls' Gymnastic
Team on winning the State Championship. Tenpas requested the addition
of Item (4), Rotary Club Donation of Trees to the City.
Jullie requested that Resolution No. 91-52 be added to the Consent
Calendar under Item III.E. He also requested the addition a Item K to the Consent Calendar which would be the second reading of Ordinance
No. 33-90-PUD-12-90 and Developer's Agreement on the Eden Prairie
Assembly of God project. Also on Item VII.A., Resolution No. 91-55
should be included regarding the Summary of Findings on the Proposed
Flying Cloud Airport Noise Abatement Plan.
Agenda approved as amended 5-0.
II. MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February a 1991
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the
City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 19, 1991.
C-'
City Council Minutes 2 March 5, 19
Pidcock requested a correction on Page 9 of the minutes in the first
paragraph, third sentence: "Pidcock suggested that the Hennepin
Technical College be contacted to see if it could donate some of the
services."
Minutes approved as amended 5-0.
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. KMSP CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS by Kraus Anderson Company. 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 4-91-PUD-1-91, Zoning District Change from
C-Reg to C-Reg-Ser on 5.63 acres with shoreland variances to be
reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Approval of Developer's
Agreement; Adoption of Resolution No. 91-49, Authorizing Summary of
Ordinance No. 4-91-PUD-1-91 and Ordering Publication; Adoption of
Resolution No. 91-33, Site Plan Review on 5.63 acres; 7.2 acres into
one lot and one outlot for construction of a 47,700 square foot
building to be known as KMSP TV, Channel 9 (Ordinance No. 4-91-
PUD-1-91 - Zoning District Change; Resolution No. 91-49 -
Authorizing Summary and Publication; Resolution No. 91-33 - Site
Plan Review)
C. Final Plat Approval of KMSP Plaza (located at the N.W. Corner of
Prairie Center Drive and Vijjg Drive) Resolution No. 91-45
D. Receive Feasibility Study for Sunrise Circle Street and Utility
Improvements, I.C. 52-205 (Resolution No. 91-46)
E. Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Consultant Engineering Services
for the Widening of T.H. 5 from CSAH 17 to TH 41 in Carver County
F. A_pprove Plans for Valley View Road Extension and Authorize
Advertisement for Bids, I.C, 52-221 (Resolution No. 91-48)
G. A_.p_proval of Playground Bids for Rustic Hills Park, Carmel Park Eden
Lake School/Park, and Red Rock Park
H. Resolution No. 91-51 Giving Preliminary Approval to the Issuance of
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for the Tanager Creek Apartments
Project
I. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Study for Leona Road Storm
Sewer Improvements, I.C. 52-218 (Resolution No. 91-47)
J. Reqliest from the Chamber of Commerce for the Assistance with
Payment for Business Survey
City Council Minutes 3 March 5, 19.•
K. EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD ty Eden Prairie Assembly of God.
Second Reading of Ordinance #33-90-PUD-12-90, Zoning District
change from 1-Gen, R1-22 and Rural to Public on 32.7 acres; Approval
of Developer's Agreement; Adoption of Resolution 91-56, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance 33-90-PUD-12-90 and Ordering Publication;
Adoption of Resolution 91-54, Site Plan Review on 32.7 acres; 39-21
acres into 4 lots and road right of way for construction of a church
and other commercial and office uses to be known as Eden Prairie
Assembly of God. Location: State Highway *5 at Dell Road. A
continued public hearing.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Consent
Calendar.
Anderson said he would like discussion on Item J, Request from the
Chamber of Commerce for the Assistance with Payment for Business
Survey. He was concerned that the Chamber of Commerce had made
a commitment for the study and now it was asking the City to pay a
portion of it. Hie said that the total cost of the residential survey
was approximately $15,400. He said the City had planned to do a
survey but had not included the item in the 1990 budget. The
Chamber of Commerce had strongly urged the City to proceed with a
community survey. The Chamber's business survey cost $4,700.
Tenpas said that because the City received from benefit from the
business portion of the survey, he would favor paying for this part
of the survey as requested by the Chamber.
MOTION
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to remove Item J from the
Consent Calendar for further study. Motion approved 5-0.
Motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended approved 5-0.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications, I.C.
52-160 LStreet and Utility Improvements on Dell Road between T.H. 5
and MAR 1 and Scenic fleights Road between CSAH 4 and Dell Road (Resolution No. 91 -40) Continued from February 5, 1991.
JuHie said this hearing was continued from February 5, 1991, at
which time staff was given direction by Council to amend the
Feasibility Study as to the phasing of the project and the method of
spreading out the special assessments.
City Council Minutes 4 March 5, 199:
Dietz said the project was now a two-phase project instead of a
three-phase project, and he explained the revised project with the
use of maps and charts. He said the cost was now $4 million instead
of $6 million as originally planned because the southerly portion of
Dell Road had been eliminated. He said the proposal was to assess
adjacent properties for a 32-foot-wide street plus an 8-inch water
main and the appropriate cost for sanitary sewer. He said the
assessment would be $83.60 per front foot. The cost for watermain
was estimated at $20.24 per front foot, and the expectation was that
right-of-way would be dedicated with the developing properties.
There were some special situations regarding dedication with the
Gilk, Wagner, and Ruud properties because of the amount of land
being acquired.
Dietz requested Council approval of the project and authorization to
proceed with plans and specifications. He said that the plans could
then be completed in May, bids opened by the end of May,
Assessment Hearing on June 18, with contracts awarded approximately
July 18. With that schedule, phase one construction should be
nearly completed by the end of the construction season in the fall.
He said that one of the issues was right-of-way dedication, and if
that process were to go well, the schedule would be accelerated.
Difficulty with right-of-way acquisition could delay the project.
Dietz summarized the changes as: (1) The phasing had been cut from
three phases to two phases; (2) The City's share had doubled from
$1 million to $2 million; (3) Method of assessment had been changed
to a front-foot assessment rather than an area-wide assessment as
proposed with the initial project.
Stephen Wagner, 8430 Eden Prairie Road, also speaking for Pete and
Georgia Ruud, said he was disappointed in the revised feasibility
study. He requested Council take definitive and accountable actions
on the following issues: (1) Sponsor a hardship right-of-way taking
of the Ruud property. (2) Establish a design for Scenic Heights
Road so as to determine land use on the remaining properties. (3)
Support a commercial zoning of a small parcel which would remain
between Scenic Heights Road and the Highway #212 right-of-way. (4)
Determine a fair and reasonable assessment as it relates to the
properties.
Anderson requested staff to address the hardship issue, design, and
the assessments. Tenpas, Harris, and Pidcock agreed.
Dick Feerick, an Eden Prairie resident, said he believed MnDOT would
cooperate in a legitimate hardship matter such as the one with the
Ruud property.
City Council Minutes 5 March 5,
Spencer Siegel, an attorney representing the Schoers Property as
well as the Jacques-Ballack property spoke to the issue. He said
that George Schoers was concerned that the short segment of
sanitary sewer would be totally assessed against his property in the
amount of $36,000. He believed this to be unfair because the sewer
would serve the east side the road as well. Dietz said that the
feasibility study allows for this issue to be negotiated with the land
owner prior to final design. Klegel said that Schoers may decide not
to sell the property for development, but would consider negotiation
the donation of a right-of-way. On the Jacques-Ballack property,
Klegel said interest had been shown in purchasing the 15-acre parcel
north of Dell Road. As a result of the proposed project, the
property south of Highway 212 would be totally cut off and useless.
He said his clients were concerned that the assessments would be
against only 30 acres which could be developed.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, that the public hearing be
closed and Resolution No. 91-40 ordering the improvements on Dell
Road and Scenic Heights Road on Improvement Contract No. IC52-160,
be approved. Motion approved 5-0.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock that staff return to Council with
responses to the issues raised by Mr. Wagner in his memo of March
5, 1991.
Tenpas said he would like Mr. Wagner to have the opportunity to
respond to staff recommendations as the project progresses. Council
was in agreement on this point and also requested that the
hardship issue on the Ruud property be addressed.
Motion approved 5-0.
B. WELTER'S PURGATORY ACRES 6TH ADDITION. Request of Peter
Andrea Company for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on
10.95 acres into 7 single family lots, 1 outlot and road right-of-way
to be known as Welter's Purgatory Acres 6th Addition. Location:
North of Welter's Way and south of Sunnybrook Road. (Ordinance
No. 7-91 - Rezoning, Resolution No. 91-42) Continued from February
19, 1991.
Jullie said that this item was continued from the February 19, 1991
Council meeting. Official notice was mailed to 57 property owners in
the project area and was published in the February 7, 1991 issue of
Eden Prairie News.
C":"
City Council Minutes 6 March 5, 19S ,1
Jim Ostenson, representing Peter Andrea Company, explained the
details of the project with the use of maps. The proponent was
requesting a variance to build a cul-de-sac longer than the allowed
500 feet for seven lots on a 10-acre site. He said that after
thorough investigation of the soil, wetlands and terrain of the area,
he believed the cul-de-sac to be a better alternative than having a
through street in the area. This plan would also reduce tree loss
by one-third and would not encroach on the wetlands or the deer
corridor.
Ostenson also said that the strong preference in the neighborhood
was for the cul-de-sac for both safety and environmental reasons.
He also said that the DNR had urged as small amount of development
on the "bluff" line as possible and was concerned about additional
runoff if a through street were to be built.
Enger said the item was reviewed at the January 25, 1991 and
February 11, 1991 meetings of the Planning Commission. It had
recommended that the Council deny the request of Peter Andrea
Company for the zoning district change on the 10.95 acres with
variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals and the
preliminary plat in seven single-family lots. The decision was based
upon the conflict with the City's subdivision ordinance which limited
cul-de-sacs to a maximum length of 500 feet, and because the it
believed there was no alternative access for fire and other safety
vehicles or school busses.
He pointed out that City's policy was also to examine new
subdivisions to ascertain whether or not cul-de-sacs could
reasonably be continued through in order to eliminate unnecessary
cul-de-sacs.
Enger said the Planning Commission had recommended denial of the
cul-de-sac; however, the recommendations from the staff to the
Planning Commission to consider approval of a cul-de-sac were as
follows: (1) The use of a cul-de-sac was an appropriate way to
develop the property; (2) Staff would recommend approval based on
the staff report of January 25, 1991 and plans dated January 14,
1991.
Enger said the Planning Commission required that prior to City
Council approval the proponent shall: (a) extend a concrete sidewalk
approximately 210 feet into the property on the west side of Welter's
Way; (b) extend a 6-inch water line to Sunnybrook Road; (c) meet
with Dtift to resolve any issues regarding drainage; (d) receive a
waiver from the City Council for a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet;
(e) receive variances from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for
structure setbacks on three lots and for a 20-foot road frontage
rather than the required 55-foot road frontage on the cul-de-sac for
one lot; If) submit a cross-access easement for the portion of the
private drive that crosses the corner opposed to Lot 1 prior to final
City Council Minutes 7 March 5, 1991
plat; (g) submit a conservation easement to cover the DNR protected
wetland on the east side of the property; (h) dedicate Outlot A to
the City free and clear of any liens, mortgages, or incumbrance, or
environmental hazards; (i) submit surety for the tree replacement of
294 caliper-inches; (j) submit a detailed storm water runoff and
erosion control plan for review by the Watershed District and the
City Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any grading
permit, and install proper erosion control and tree protection fencing
at the construction limits; (k) pay a cash park fee which would be
charged in this case.
Lambert said that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission reviewed the proposal at their March 4, 1991 meeting and
basically addressed two issues: (1) 'The natural resources impacts of
a cul-de-sac versus a through street, and (2) the proposed trail
locations or access to the neighborhood park. The Commission
recognized that both alternatives would put a street through a core
of the most significant trees. The Commission believed that the loss
of a tree mass due to the installation of a through street would be
greater than a cul-de-sac. The Commission also was concerned about
the impact of a through street on the marsh. Therefore, it had
recommended support of the cul-de-sac on a 7-0 vote. It also
recommended on a 7-0 vote that a trail corridor along the creek be
relied upon for access to the creek and Creekwood Park, through
the outlot, whenever the creek trail was available. It believed that
going between houses with a sidewalk or trail should be avoided
because there was a sidewalk to Sunnybrook and then to the park,
giving safe access.
Bob Solohub, 11760 Welters Way, spoke in support of the development
plan. He said there was strong support in the neighborhood for the
cul-de-sac for safety and environmental reasons. He said he also
believed it maintained the integrity of the neighborhood. He
presented a petition from 44 homeowners in the area in favor of the
development proposal and asked that Council approve the cul-de-sac
plan.
Bill Hoag, 11995 Sunnybrook Road, spoke in favor of the cul-de-sac.
He was concerned for the safety of children in the area should a
through road be built.
Anderson said that he would like to see a trail connection through
this neighborhood. Lambert said that it would mean designing a
trail between two private properties. He said that the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission had concluded that
because there was an outlet down to the creek where a trail would
be eventually provided, to put in a trail access at this time would be
a duplication of something that would happen in the future.
Anderson said that he believed it would be easier to put the trail in
City Council Minutes 8 March 5, 1991
before the houses were built. Tenpas said because the park was not
used by a great number of people, he would be opposed to putting a
second trail in this development.
Jim Ostenson pointed out that most people would have access to the
trail from Sunnybrook Road. There would be 20 families who would
have to walk back approximately one block to get to the trail access.
He said the safest alternative was to bring people out to Sunnybrook
Road rather than Homeward Hills Road. Also the park had facilities
for children 10 years and older and so there would not be small
children using it. He advised against putting a trail between houses
if it could be avoided.
MOTION
Jessen moved to close the public hearing and approve the 1st
Reading of Ordinance No. 7-91 for Rezoning, Adopt Resolution No. 91-
42 for Preliminary Plat approval; and Direct Staff to prepare a
Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations. Seconded by Tenpas.
Harris said she was not comfortable with not having a through street
in the area. However, because the cul-de-sac was not a great deal
longer than the existing dead-end streets, she would vote in favor
of it.
Pidcock said she would support the motion if the cul-de-sac was
made wider and the trail were included. Anderson agreed with
Pidcock on the trail but would support the cul-de-sac because of the
environmental issue. Tenpas said he would favor the cul-de-sac and
support the motion.
Vote on the motion was 3-0-2 with Pidcock and Anderson abstaining.
Motion failed.
Anderson said he would like the issue of the trail to be investigated
thoroughly to see if something could be worked out for a temporary
trail connection and also investigate the possibility of a turn-around
for emergency vehicles or school busses. Harris and Jessen
expressed concerned about putting in a second trail at this time
when there was a plan for the trail to be put in at some future
date.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to reconsider the previous
action. Motion approved 5-0.
City Council Minutes 9 March 5, 1991
MOTION
Jessen accepted Anderson's suggestion as a friendly amendment to
the original motion to direct staff to investigate the possibility of a
trail connection. First motion approved as amended 5-0.
C. OUTSIDE STORAGE AND DISPLAY by City of Eden Prairie. Request
for amendment to City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subdivision
3.J.1. and 2., and by adding a new 4., to clarify regulations
pertaining to outside storage and display in Industrial and
Commercial Districts. (Ordinance No. 3-91) Continued from February
19, 1991.
JuHie said this item was continued from February 19, 1991. Original
notice for the hearing was published in the February 7, 1991 issue
of Eden Prairie News. He said the proposed ordinance clarified what
must be screened and what must be enclosed in the industrial and
commercial districts. Planning Commission recommended approval of
the ordinance at its January 28, 1991 meeting.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to close the public hearing and
approve first Reading of Ordinance No. 3-91 pertaining to outside
storage and display in Industrial and Commercial Districts.
Anderson asked what was meant by outside storage and asked if
temporary greenhouses where bags of fertilizer and other supplies
were kept would be classified as outside storage. Enger said any
storage area that did not conform to zoning standards with regard
to exterior building material would be considered outside storage.
He said the purpose of the ordinance was to cover what was
discovered to be a loophole in the ordinance covering industrial and
commercial districts. He cited the case of the proposed medical
waste incinerator in the 62 Crosstown Industrial Park. The way that
the I-General District of the Zoning Code was worded, it seemed to
allow processing and manufacturing outside, which was not intended.
The language had been corrected so that all processing and
manufacturing must be done inside. Enger added that there
probably were some violations of this ordinance in the City.
Motion approved 5-0.
City Council Minutes 10 March 5, 1991
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve payment of claims.
Payment of claims approved with Jessen, Pidcock, Harris, Anderson and
Tenpas all voting "AYE".
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Presentation of Revised Flying Cloud Airport Noise Abatement Plan
(Continued from February 19, 1991)
Jullie said this item was continued from the February 19, 1991
meeting. He said that the Metropolitan Airports Commission had
prepared a plan for the City regarding noise abatement at Flying
Cloud Airport. Staff believed that the plan represented a good
beginning to help control aircraft-related noise at Flying Cloud
Airport.
William Helker, 7230 Divinity Lane, chair of the City's Flying Cloud
Airport Advisory Commission, said this group had been working with
the Metropolitan Airports Commit:sion to strengthen and improve the
Noise Abatement Flail. On February 6, 1991, the Advisory Commission
voted to recommend to Council favorable consideration and
endorsement of Flying Cloud Airport Noise Abatement Plan as
presented. He pointed out that the plan reflected compromise on the
part of all members of the Commission, particularly of members of the
Airport Business Association.
Tim Anderson, Director of Airports for the Metropolitan Airports
Commission, reviewed the plan. He pointed out that the noise
abatement plan was a step toward some of the construction planned
for Flying Cloud Airport, but he believed it was a good plan even if
construction was not done at the airport.
He reviewed the reference to monitoring. The revised plan provides
for more monitoring than the original plan, and said monitoring was
planned for June, July, and August, 1991. There were two reasons
for monitoring: (1) To monitor the performance of pilots in the
pattern and their compliance with the noise abatement plan; and (21
to verify noise levels. The Commission would report to the Council
in one year on the status of the monitoring and the status of the
Noise Abatement Plan.
City Council Minutes 11 March 5, 1991
Anderson said the basic enforcement tool was the lease arrangements
with tenants at the airport. Leases could be terminated for failure
to comply with airport rules. He said educational programs for all
persons who use the airport were planned, such as local seminars
and articles in publications which were directed to pilots, as well as
education through various aviation associations.
He said that it was the intention of the Metropolitan Airports
Commission that upon endorsement from the City, the airport staff
would incorporate the Noise Abatement Plan into the Comprehensive
Master Plan Update for the Flying Cloud Airport to seek approval
from the Metropolitan Airports Commission, probably in April.
Enger pointed out that the Council was on record as recommending
denial of the MAC Master Plan. After the MAC Master Plan had gone
to the Metropolitan Council, it had adopted it subject to Eden Prairie
and MAC being able to work out several issues. The noise element
of that approval was only one item. The resolution outlines that
adoption of the Noise Abatement Plan would be only the beginning
step in a noise abatement plan process, gathering information on
noise at the airport. He said that staff believed that MAC's
commitment to extend the duration of the monitoring would produce
more useful information and an indication as to how effective the
proposed noise control methods would be. He emphasized that this
was only the first step in a noise abatement plan. Other items that
the Metropolitan Council had requested that MAC work on with the
City included: (1) Provision of sewer and water to the airport; (2)
Encourage joint airport zoning board; (3) A runway extension to
5,000 feet continue to be evaluated; (4) Preliminary site design and
visual effects be evaluated at time of development of the airport
building area plan; (5) That land uses around the airport be
considered to provide compatibility with any airport expansion.
Jessen asked if the noise at the airport would be less because of
this plan and how the monitoring would be done. Tim Anderson said
that the goal was not necessarily to reduce noise but to put it in a
more favorable area. In the case of Flying Cloud Airport this would
be over the river basin area as opposed to over homes. He said
monitoring would be done at least five days a week.
Joe Lowney, 8012 Timber Lake Drive, a fixed-base operator at Flying
Cloud Airport, said that the seaplanes were fairly noisy because of
the propeller speed. He said his organization had instructed users
of the airport on how to stop the supersonic noise of the propeller.
He said that students were instructed in remote areas instead of
flying close to the airport as a way of reducing airport noise.
Don Atkins, 9580 Eden Prairie Road, said he believed the airport was
noisier in 1967 than it was today. He said that the small planes
were noisier than the jets. He favored a monitoring system and
updating of the airport.
City Council Minutes 12 March 5, 1991
Bob Hallett, 17051 Valley Road, said he believed the Advisory
Commission was made up of persons who had a vested interest in
Flying Cloud Airport and therefore the recommendations from the
Advisory Commission should be taken in that context. He said the
noise from the jets disturbed him a great deal. He questioned if the
noise standards were appropriate. He asked why monitoring was
contingent on the availability of an intern, and suggested that
someone be hired to do this. He said he favored increased
monitoring. He also said he would like the reference to measures
taken against repeat offenders to be more specific. He said he was
not in favor of expanding the airport and suggested that if property
values were lowered as a result of the expansion, the property
owners should be reimbursed.
Steve Yerkes, 16575 Hilltop Road, said that he believed the noise was
a real problem and that moving the noise would have a relatively
small impact compared to the impact of any future expansion of the
airport. He encouraged the Council to keep this in mind when
considering the Noise Abatement Plan.
Dave Rasmussen, 16275 Valley Road, said he supported the Noise
Abatement Plan. He proposed that a vendor be found to supply
fixed equipment at the airport to monitor the noise and that noise be
monitored in real time by the control tower. In this way, pilots
could be notified immediately of any violation.
Tim Anderson explained that noise monitoring would give information
only on accumulated noise and not noise from a particular aircraft.
On the issue of permanent monitors, this could be done, but
experience had shown that pilots tend to cut back power over the
monitoring device which often results in decreased safety. For this
reason the Metropolitan Airports Commission did not endorse this
method of monitoring.
Jim Mitchell, 7341 Franklin Circle, General Manager for ASI Modern
Aero at Flying Cloud Airport, said most operators were very
committed to the Noise Abatement Plan and were aware who the
violators were. Therefore, the operators could do a lot to correct any
violations. He said that the higher altitudes required at the airport
had helped with the noise problem to some extent.
Mark Michaelson, 17151 Cedarcrest, said he believed the problem was
that planes were lower than 1000 feet required in the approach area.
He favored monitoring on weekends and videotaping aircraft. He also
favored measuring the spikes of noise rather than using
accumulative effect figures. He said he believed individual pilots
should be fined if they violated the noise standards.
City Council Minutes 13 March 5, 1991
Kent Barker, 15801 Cedar Ridge Road, said he believed violators of
the noise standards should be charged with misdemeanors according
to State statues, but this had not happened. He said there was no
real enforcement regarding the altitudes and patterns used by pilots.
He said that he believed MAC made promises that were not followed
through. He said noise spikes were a concern in a community that
was generally quiet such as Eden Prairie. He said that believed
allowing large aircraft represented a safety issue.
Tenpas asked what authority the City had to regulate noise levels at
the airport. Pauly replied that he believed the City had no
authority in this matter.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, at 11:05 PM to continue the
meeting for 30 minutes. Motion approved 5-0.
George Pearson, 6912 Rosemary Road, said he believed that the MAC
was attempting to shift jets to Flying Cloud Airport with the
expansion plan. He questioned the necessity for the expansion.
Al Lange, President of Elliott Beechcraft, 13801 Pioneer Trail,
suggested that the Council look at the positive things about Flying
Cloud Airport. (1) The airport brings business into the City and the
State by companies such as John Deere and Detroit Tool. (2) The
airport was an educational center for students who wished to learn
about aviation careers. (3) Flying Cloud had the only air traffic
control facility in the country outside of a facility in Oklahoma City
operated by the FAA. (4) One of three technical colleges in the
state for training aviation mechanics was located on Flying Cloud
Airport. (5) There were schools at the Airport teaching people how
to fly. (6) The Airport afforded an opportunity for jobs with 400
persons being employed there. (7) Flying Cloud Airport was a
business center with property and real estate taxes being paid to
the community. (8) Flying Cloud Airport was one of the last
remaining open spaces in the community and very well maintained by
MAC. (9) The Airport was a recreational center with ball fields and
soccer fields being located there at minimal cost to the City.
Mr. Lange advised the Council against more restrictions at the
Airport as he believed it would discourage business from coming into
the City and the State.
Bob Gartner, 15769 Cedar Ridge Road, said that MAC had been
reluctant to enforce rules in the past. However, he encouraged the
Council to cooperate with MAC on the noise issue.
Council was in general agreement that the City should work with
MAC on the Noise Abatement Plan.
City Council Minutes 14 March 5, 1991
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Tenpas, to adopt Resolution No. 91-55,
Summary of Findings on the Proposed Flying Cloud Airport Noise
Abatement Plan.
Jessen suggested that a requirement for continuous monitoring be
included in the resolution. This would revise the first sentence in
Item 1 of the Resolution to read: "The Metropolitan Airports
Commission provide additional and continuous aircraft noise
monitoring..." Harris and Tenpas accepted this addition to the
motion.
Motion approved 5-0.
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, A COMMITTEES
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. Reports of Councilmembers
1. Appointment Announcement
Pidcock announced that Harris had been appointed by Governor
Carlson to a seat on the Joint Commission of Judicial Appointments.
2. Park Reserve District Board
Jessen said there was a change proposed to eliminate the two
County Board appointments to the Hennepin Parks Board. If this
change were to go forward, each of the municipal councils would
be asked to adopt a resolution supporting an all-elected Park
Board. He said that meetings would continue to be held on the
subject.
3. Eden Prairie High School Gymnastics Championship
MOTION
Anderson moved that the Girls Gymnastics Team from Eden Prairie
High School and their coaches be commended for their efforts and
success in winning the State Championship Title for Girls
Gymnastics. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0.
Jessen suggested that other teams, not just those in athletics, be
recognized for their achievements.
City Council Minutes 15 March 5, 1991
5. Rotary Club Donation of Trees
Tenpas announced that the Rotary Club of Eden Prairie had
designated $1,000 a year for the acquisition of trees, and directed
staff to draft a thank-you letter that could be read at the next
Rotary Club meeting.
B. Renort a City Manager
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjourn and 11:40 PM. Motion
approved 4-0.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
March 19, 1991
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Alert Electric, Inc.
Bachman Construction
Bradley Building Corp.
Control Data Corporation
Donlar Construction Co.
Hauenstein & Burmeister,Inc.
Lilac Construction
Space Control
T R B, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
Peter Andrea Company
Mark Charles, Inc.
Durst & Gans Construction
Gestach Paulson Construction
Michael Hayes Homes, Inc.
Hirsch Builders
Luse & Son, Inc.
Oertel Custom Homes
PLUMBING
A & G Plumbing, Inc.
Bowler Company, Inc.
Brown's Plumbing
Bruckmueller Plumbing
Custom Plumbing, Inc.
Earl W. Day & Sons
Dependable Well Company
Donahue Mechanical
Grupa Mechanical
Nelson Water Conditioning
Plumm, Inc.
South Metro Plumbing & Heating
Vesey Plumbing Company
Widmer Incorporated
TYPE C FOOD
Total Petroleum
GAS FITTER
A & G Plumbing, Inc.
Advanced Mechanical Contractors
Air Mechanical, Inc.
Bowler Company, Inc.
Countryside Heating & Cooling
Custom Plumbing, Inc.
D.J.'s Heating & Air Conditioning
Edina SW Plumbing
Faircon Service
Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal
Marsh Heating & Air Conditioning
Reuse Mechanical, Inc.
Yale, Inc.
HEATING & VENTILATING
Acclaim Services, Inc.
Advanced Mechanical Contractors
Air Mechanical, Inc.
Allan Mechanical, Inc.
Bowler Company, Inc.
Check Refrigeration, Inc.
Countryside Heating & Cooling
D.J.s Heating & Air Conditioning
Faircon Service
Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.
Marsh Heating & Air Conditioning
Rouse Mechanical, Inc.
South Metro Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Yale, Inc.
UTILITY INSTALLER
Widmer Incorporated
CIGARETTE
Terrific Lunch
Total Petroleum
U-Serve-It, Inc.
••n
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
page two
OFF SALE BEER
TEMPORARY LIQUOR
Eden Prairie 66
Pax Christi Catholic Church
(4-26-91)
Temporary Liquor
Eden Prairie Lions
Schooner Days (May 31, June 1 & 2)
TEMPORARY BEER
Eden Prairie Lions
Schooner Days (May 31, June 1 & 2)
July 4th
Corn Feed (August 10)
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
1 ./^e.J j6.(„Li
Pat Solie
Licensing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-60
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
Village Knolls
WHEREAS, the plat of Village Knolls has been submitted in a manner required for platting land
under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and
all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Village Knolls is approved upon compliance with the
recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated March 14, 1991.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-
month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat
and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's. report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers
THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, P.E., City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: March 14, 1991
SUBJECT: Village Knolls (Resolution No. 91-60)
PROPOSAL: Argus Development, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the final plat
of Village Knolls. The plat is located at the southeast corner of Homeward Hills Road
and Silverwood Road in the South Half of Section 26. The plat contains 42.7 acres to
be divided into 23 single family lots, two outlots, and right-of-way dedication for street
purposes. Outlots A and B contain 19.5 and 14.5 acres respectively. Ownership of
Outlot A will be retained by Hustad Development Corporation for development at a later
date, while ownership of Outlot B will be conveyed to the City for open space purposes
along Purgatory Creek.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council June 19, 1990 per
Resolution No. 90-167.
Second reading of Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90, Planned Unit Development District
Review and Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District, is scheduled for
final approval March 19, 1991.
The developer's agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution
March 19, 1991.
VARIANCES: A Variance is necessary from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-
month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing
of the final plat. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of
Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets will be installed by the
developer in conformance with City Standards.
This project includes undeveloped lots and road right-of-way previously platted as part
of Bluffs West. Vacation of those underlying easements and right-of-way will be
necessary prior to release of final plat.
Final Plat - Village Knolls
(Resolution No. 91-60)
March 14, 1991
Page 2 of 2
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will conform to the developer's agreement
requirements and City Code.
BONDING: Bonding for municipal utilities and streets must be provided prior to release of the
final plat and conform to City Code and the developer's agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Village Knolls subject to the
requirements of this report, the developer's agreement and the following:
1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $478.00.
2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $3,240.
3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $920.
4. Completion of vacation of drainage and utility easements and street right-of-Way.
5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements.
JJ:ssa
cc: Brian Olson, Argus Development
Paul Cheme, Pioneer Engineering
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-61
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed in Village Knolls
requires a connection to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC)
interceptor system; and
WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie
Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY
COUNCIL:
The City Engineer is here authorized and directed to submit an application
for "Permit for Connection to or Use of Commission Facilities" to the
Metropolitan Control Commission.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 19, 1991
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
'
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Carl J. Julie, City Manager
FROM: Joseph A. Milan, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: February 5, 1991
SUBJECT: Condemnation of Property Owned by the American
Fundamentalist Church, Among Others, Located at 15817
valley View Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
In 1987 the City improved Valley View Road by widening the
existing road and constructing a walking path. As part of the
project, it was necessary to condemn a portion of the property
belonging to the American Fundamentalist Church, among others.
The condemnation proceeding was challenged by the owners of the
property and resulted in litigation.
An appraisal conducted by an expert retained by the City
determined the value of the subject propety to be approximately
$6,100.00. The special assessment against the property for the
improvements was $7,200.00. The parties settled the litigation
by agreeing that the appraised value would be $7,200.00 which
equaled the special assessment for the improvement. There will
be no payment to the owners. Instead, the amount of the
settlement will be used to satisfy the special assessment.
Considerable discussion regarding the language of the settlement
agreement delayed its execution. The owners of the property
finally executed the settlement agreement in late June of 1990.
However, the attorney for the owners of the property failed to
return the Stipulation of Dismissal, which is required to bring
the matter to conclusion. On February 4, 1991, the attorney for
the owners of the property agreed to execute and return the
Stipulation of Dismissal.
The Settlement Agreement is submitted hereby for approval and
signature by the City. The effect of the Settlement Agreement
will be to consummate the condemnation of the property, transfer
ownership of the property to the City, and satisfy the
outstanding special assessment against the property.
-1-
-.0
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
City of Eden Prairie,
Petitioner, File No. CD-2002
VS. Case Type: Condemnation
The American Fundamentalist
Church, a Minnesota Religious
Corporation, The American
Fundamentalist Church, a
Minnesota Corporation, Basic
Bible Church of America, ch 8035,
Douglas A. Page, as Trustee of
Basic Bible Church of America,
ch 8035, Carolyn Page, as Trustee
of Basic Bible Church of America,
ch 8035, Douglas A. Page, Carolyn
Page also known as Caroline Page,
James R. Tice, City of Eden
Prairie, a Minnesota Municipal
Corproation, the County of
Hennepin, and the Director of
the Internal Revenue Service,
Respondents.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
The following individuals and corporations agree to be made
parties to this agreement and further agree to be bound by its
terms and conditions:
The American Fundamentalist Church
Basic Bible Church of America, ch 8035
Douglas A. Page, as Trustee of Basic Bible Church of
America, ch 8035
Douglas A. Page
City of Eden Prairie
WHEREAS, the above-named parties have numerous claims,
actions, causes of action and differences between themselves; and
—
Page 2
WHEREAS, the parties deem it desirable to settle all of their
claims, actions, causes of action and differences; and
WHEREAS, the parties believe the best way to accomplish such
a settlement is through this Settlement Agreement;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants
and promises hereinafter contained, which the parties explici
t
l
y
agree shall constitute ample and sufficient consideration,
t
h
e
parties do hereby agree as follows:
1. The parties hereto agree that the Commissioners appointed
in this proceeding may make and enter an award in the amount
o
f
$7,200.00 representing the total damages suffered by Respond
e
n
t
s
for the taking of the property described in the Petition here
i
n
.
2. The parties hereto agree to enter into a stipulation of
dismissal with prejudice and on the merits of that cer
t
a
i
n
lawsuit entitled:
State of Minnesota by The American
Fundamentalist Church, a Minnesota Religious
Corporation, and Reverend Douglas Page l.
Individually and as Pastor of The American
Fundamentalist Church, Plaintiff vs. The City
of Eden Prairie / a Municipal Corporation,
Defendant.
Hennepin County District Court File No.
97-08661
3. The parties hereto agree to the Special Assessment in the
amount of $7,200.00 assessed against the property owned by
t
h
e
Respondents. Further, Respondents agree not to object to said
Special Assessment and withdraw any objection or appeal which
m
a
y
Page 3
have been taken against the Special Assessment.
4. The Respondents agree to waive any and all claims for
any additional damages caused by the taking described in the
Petition hereto, provided, however, that this waiver is a waiver
only for the damages caused by the act of the taking itself.
5. The parties further agree that the $6,000.00 paid into
Court by the City of Eden Prairie plus an additional $1,200.00 to
be paid by Eden Prairie to the Respondents as and for the award
described in paragraph 2 above, shall be immediately paid over to
the City of Eden Prairie as and for payment of the Special
Assessment in the amount of $7,200.00. The parties further
stipulate and agree to the entry of an order by the Honorable 0.
Harold Odland, Judge of District Court directing the Hennepin
County District Court Administrator's office to release the
$6,000.00 to the City of Eden Prairie.
EACH OF THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY
HAVE FULLY READ THE AGREEMENT, UNDERSTAND AND AGREE TO BE BOUND
BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, HAVE CONSULTED WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
AND ARE ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement this :;(7 day of ii..4/1.4?.- , 19.
THE AMERICAN FUNDAMENTALIST
CHURCH
Page 4
BASIC BIBLE CHURCH OF AMERICA,
CH 8035
Its
Dougl A. Page, as
Trustee of Basic Bible Church of
America, ch 8035
417.,
Douglas,g-15ige
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
BY
Its
JAN/1600.017A
06-19-90
,•••• ."`
RELEASE OF LAND
This Release of Land is executed by the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal
corporation ("City"), and is dated as of March 19, 1991.
FACTS
1. A certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments ("Agreement") dated May 24. 1989,
was executed by and between the City, and Robert H. Mason. Inc.. a Minnesota
Corporation which Agreement was filed as Document No. 5540405 with the Hennepin
County Recorder on June 6. 1989. The Agreement related to the property described
therein as:
Lots 1 through 30, Block I; Lots 1 through 10, Block 2; Lots 1 through 21,
Block 3; and Outlots C, D, E, F, and G; Boulder Pointe, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
Since the time said Agreement was filed, Outlots C and G, Boulder Pointe have
been replatted into Lots 1 through 31, Block 1; Outlots A and B; Boulder Pointe
West Townhomes; and Lots 1 through 51, Block 1 Boulder Pointe Townhomes
respectively.
2. The special assessments contemplated by the Agreement have been levied and the time
for appeal has expired.
3. To evidence the fact that the special assessments have been levied and the time for appeal
has expired, the City is executing this Release of Land.
- Page 2 -
THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereby
releases the Property described above from all obligations and conditions set forth in the
Agreement Regarding Special Assessments dated May 24. 1989 filed with the Hennepin County
Recorder as Document No. 5540405 on June 6. 1989. This Release of Land shall not release
or discharge the Property from the lien of any special assessments levied by the City pursuant
to the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie has executed the foregoing
instrument.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
A Municipal Corporation
BY:
Douglas B. Tenpas
Its Mayor
BY:
Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
- Page 3 -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1991, by Douglas B. Tenpas and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden
Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of said
corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd.
230 Suburban National Bank
300 Prairie Center Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RELEASE.0
RFR/01-14-88
February 14, 1991
PROJECT:
CHANGE ORDER NO. 5
Mitchell/Research Road Improvements
West 76th St. Sidewalk Improvements
Golden Triangle Drive Improvements
Co. Rd. 1 Watermain Improvements
RCM Project No. 831015-2
I.C. 52-051
LC. 52-110
I.C. 52-110
I.C. 52-149
TO: Northdale Construction Company, Inc.
You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the Mitchell/Research Road
Improvements Project.
NATURE OF CHANGE:
1. Add berms, place riprap, filter blanket, creek outlet, saw and repair bituminous bike
path, clean 3' of dirt out of walk through culvert twice and remove and replace 30'
of curb and gutter, broken due to repair. This work was due to the Middle School
drainage water being concentrated to this area and causing these problems.
2. During final clean up, the available topsoil is depleted and requires topsoil borrow
to finish the project.
3. To place external air release piping at the watermain air release manhole near
County Road I on Mitchell, as required by the Water Department.
4. Construct storm MH 44A, CB 44B, 104' of 12" PVC and a berm. Relay stub out of CB
44 to do this. This is to pick up concentrated drainage from old Research Road to
east of Sta. 138+25.
5. Replace shrubs in sewer service ditch, Sta. 8+15 RT on Mitchell Road. Shrubs were
transplanted but died.
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES AND COSTS:
Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
For 1 above:
Construct berms, riprap and do necessary clean
up and repairs at box culvert.
For 2 above:
Furnish topsoil borrow.
For 3 above:
Place external air release piping
LS I $14,190.44
CY 600 7.00
LS 1 319.76
$14,190.44
4,200.00
319.76
Page 1 of 2
For 4 above:
Construct storm MH 44A, CB 44B, 104' of
12' PVC and berm. LS 1 4,485.78 4,485.78
For 5 above:
Replace shrubs. LS 1 125.20 125.20
TOTAL INCREASE
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS:
Contract Amount Prior To This Change Order
Net Increase Resulting From This Change Order
Current Contract Amount Including This Change Order
$23,321.18
$1.482,362.25
• 23.321.18
81,505,683.43
The Above Changes are Approved
RCM ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Date
The Above Changes are Accepted
NORTHDAtts STRUCTI N 'OMPANY, INC.
By
Date
Page 2 of 2
="n
February 15, 1991
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
PROJECT: Mitchell Road and Sandy Pointe Addition Improvements
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
City Project No. I.C. 52-156 and 52-201
RCM Project No. 10030.03
TO: Nodland Construction Company, Inc.
You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract. These
contract changes are to Part A and Part B, I.C. 52-201, Sandy Pointe Addition.
NATURE OF CHANGE TO PART A OF CONTRACT:
IA. Furnish and install a timber retaining wall to protect the remaining oaks along
McGraw's property. Location Station 7+50 to 8+50 Mitchell Road, west side as per
Eden Prairie Specifications. Maximum height .t 5 feet.
2A. Purchase borrow from Carlson property needed to complete deep sewer backfill in
Mitchell Road.
3A. Due to easement problems, the Contractor and subcontractor had to move off the
project and later remobilize when the easement agreement was reached.
Terry Bros. Remobilization
Nodland Remobilization
4A. Construct a swale, erosion protection, extra riprap and filter blanket for CB 22 inlet
along Mitchell Road due to required low elevation for future development.
NATURE OF CHANGE TO PART B OF CONTRACT:
IB. Cost to transplant evergreen due to constructing the Corral Lane cul-de-sac and to
transplant evergreens near power box for sanitary sewer excavation.
2B. Substitute 8" watermain for e watermain for a portion on project as on plans.
3B. Substitute 18" CL 5 RCP for 15' CL 5 RCP at Corral Lane and extend sub to Corral
cul-de-sac with a new C.B. at cul-de-sac.
Page I of 3
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES AND COSTS:
Add the following quantities and costs to the contract:
PART A
For IA. above:
Furnish and Install:
Timber Retaining Wall - 550 SF @ S9.00/SF
For 2A. above:
Granular Borrow - 3500 CY @ SI.15/CY
For 3A. above:
Terry Bros. Mobilization
Nodland Constr. Mobilization
Total Addition
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
$4,950.00
$4,025.00
$862.00
2.850.00
$3,712.50
For 4A. above:
CB 22 Inlet Erosion Protection Lump Sum $441.00
PART A: TOTAL ADDITION
$13,128.50
PART B
For I B. above:
Transplant Trees
For 2B. above:
8" D.I.P. Waterma in .411 LF @ S13.00/LF
8" Gate Valve - 2 EA @ S450.00/EA
Total
For 3B. above:
18" RCP CL V Storm Sewer - 43 LF @ S20.00/LF
Eden Prairie Catchbasin - I EA @ S800.00/EA
Total
Lump Sum $229.50
$5,343.00
900.00
$6,243.00
$860.00
800.00
$1,660.00
PART B: TOTAL ADDITION $8,13250
Page 2 of 3
Deduct the following quantities and costs to thc contract:
PAR T B
For 2B above:
6" D.I.P. Watermain - 411 LF @ 511.00/LF
6" Gate Valve - 2 EA 0 $350.00/EA
Lump Sum
For 3B above:
15" RCP CL V Storm Sewer - 30 LF @ S19.00/LF
PART B: TOTAL DEDUCT
Contract Amount, Part A
Increase to Part A Resulting From this Change Order
Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order
Contract Amount, Part B with Previous Change Order *1
Increase to Part B Resulting From this Change Order
Total Part B
Decrease to Part B Resulting From this Change Order
Total Part B
Total Contract Value Including This Change Order
$4,521.00
700.00
$5,221.00
$570.00
$5,791.00
$577,433.00
13.128.50
$590,561.50
$133,152.10
8.132.50
$141,284.60
-5.791.00
$135,493.60
$726,055.10
Thc Above Chances are Approved
RCM ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Date
The Above Chances are Accepted
NODLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
By :"/
Date / 1 /•/
Page 3 of 3
CHANGE ORDER #2
I.C. 52-152
Cedar Ridge Storm Sewer Improvements
TO: City of Eden Prairie
Changes made for work performed in this contract:
NATURE OF CHANGES:
1. Add black dirt to Mrs. Meidinger's garder per Right-of-Entry
Agreement.
2. Add trees per Right-of-Entry Agreement.
3. Add two 72" manholes.
4. Add three 30" RCP bends to avoid oak tree.
5. Add additional jacking to avoid conflict with County Road 4.
ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT COSTS:
1. Add labor and materials costs - $ 1,558.40
2. Add labor and material costs - 4,961.81
3. Add labor and material costs - 5,424.80
4. Add labor and material costs - 750.00
5. Add labor and material costs - 5 ,328.00
TOTAL $18,023.01
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED
Engineer , Hanson Thorp Pellinen Olson City of Eden Prairie
By 777-..(///(2Ark-A,,2% By
Date ,T—(c./-?/ Date
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED
Contractor: Nodland Construction
BY a ,1*///6d7z:7
Date 3- 5/-
Original Contract Amount
$282,999.00
Contract Amount To Date 287,569.00
Change Order #2 Increase 18,023.01
Current Contract with CO #2
$305,592.01
Contractor: Nodland Construction
Engineer: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc.
Amoco - Edenvale Crossing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-37
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE 5-91-PUD-2-91 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5-91-PUD-2-91 was adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of March, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 5-91-PUD-2-91, which is attached
hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the
public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no
smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minn. State. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by
any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy
of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 5-91-PUD-2-91 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days
after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 19th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Amoco - Edenvale Crossing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 5-91-PUD-2-91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN
LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Community
Commercial District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 2-91-Community Commercial District
(hereinafter "PUD 2-9I-Community Commercial).
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
Agreement dated as of March 5, 1991, entered into between Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland corporation,
and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the
terms and conditions of PUD 2-91-Community Commercial, and are hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD 2-91-Community Commercial is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide
Plan of the City.
B. PUD 2-91-Community Commercial is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified
environment within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are
contained in PUD 2-91-Community Commercial are justified by the design of the development
described therein.
D. PUD 2-91-Community Commercial is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its
construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon
any subsequent unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the
Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 2-9I-Community Commercial
District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision
1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter I entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby
adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of
February, 1991, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council
of said City on the 19th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1991.
EXHIBIT A
PUD CONCEPT AMENDMENT PUD DISTRICT REVIEW
Lots 1 and 2. Block 1, EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and
Outlot 0, EDENVALE RECREATION CENTER; and Lots 1. 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, and Outlots
A, B. and C, EDENVALE RECREATION CENTER 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN REVIEW
That part of Lot 2, Block 1, EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the
northwest corner of said lot 2; thence South 86 degrees
17 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the
north line of said lot 2, a distance of 29.50 feet;
thence South 9 degrees 49 minutes 42 seconds West a
distance of 15.09 feet to the point of beginning of the
land to be described; thence South 86 degrees 17
minutes 23 seconds East, parallel with said north line
of Lot 2, a distance of 168.00 feet; thence South 3
degrees 42 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 196.00
feet; thence North 86 degrees 17 minutes 23 seconds
West, a distance of 189.01 feet to a line that bears
South 9 degrees 49 minutes 42 seconds West, from said
point of beginning; thence North 9 degrees 49 minutes
42 seconds East a distance of 197.12 feet to the point
of beginning.
Amoco - Edenvale Crossing
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 5-91-PUD-2-91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING
CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN
ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND IN EACH
DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
- SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary:. This Ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land located within the
Community Commercial Zoning District for land located in the southeast corner of Mitchell
Road and Martin Drive, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit
A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1991.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
2CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #91-35
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR AMOCO OIL COMPANY FOR AMOCO FOOD SHOP
WHEREAS, Amoco Oil Company has applied for site plan approval for construction of
a 1,000 square foot building to be known as Amoco on 0.8 acres for construction of a gas
station/food shop on property located in the southeast corner of Mitchell Road and Martin Drive
zoned Community Commercial by Ordinance # 5-9I-PUD-2-91 adopted by the City Council on
March 5, 1991; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at
its January 14, 1991 Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its
February 5, 1991 meeting;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF'
THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Amoco Oil Company
for Amoco Food Shop for construction of a 1,000 square foot building, based on plans dated
March 1, 1991, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement
between Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland corporation and the City of Eden Prairie, dated
March 5, 1991, for said gas station/food shop.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 19th of March, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John I/ Franc, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 3 -91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE CHAPTER 11 ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS (ZONING)" BY
AMENDING SECTION 11.03, SUBD. 3. J. AND SECTION 11.30, SUBD. 2.
A. AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION
11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAINS PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 11.03, Subd. 3. J. 1. and 2. of the City
Code is amended to read as follows:
1. In all Districts except I-General, all raw
materials, supplies, finished or semi-finished products and
equipment shall be stored within a completely enclosed building:
provided, however, that motor vehicles necessary to the operation
of the prin_ipal use and of not more than three-quarters ton
capacity may be stored or parked within the permitted parking lot
areas. In 1-Gen Districts outside storage is permitted, provided
it is screened in accordance with this Section.
2. In all Commercial Districts, all materials,
supplies, merchandise or other similar matter shall be stored
within a completely enclosed building, except merchandise or
equipment offered for sale, rental or lease may be displayed out-
side the confines of a building, provided the area occupied by
the merchandise or equipment for that purpose shall not exceed
101 of the base area of the building constituting the principal
use.
Section 2. Section 11.03, Subd. 3. J. of the City Code is
amended by adding 4. as follows:
4. No storage or display of any type is per-
mitted in any Commercial or Industrial District within the one-
half of the front or side street setback nearest the street nor
within any side or rear setback.
Section 3. Section 11.30, Subd. 2. A. of the City Code is
amended to read as follows:
A. Manufacturing, warehousing, wholesale,distribu-
tion, processing, packaging, assembling, compounding, and
accessory uses, conducted within a building.
Section 4. City Code Chapter I entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a
•
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference,
as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 5. This ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Eden Prairie on the day of • 199,
and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of
, 199_.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
• 199_.
day of
Outside Storage and Display
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-30
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE 3-91 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3-91 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of March, 1991.
— NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 3-91, which is attached hereto,
is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public
of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no
smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minn. State. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by
any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy
of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 3-91 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with
proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said
publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 19th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Outside Storage and Display
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 3-91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE CHAPTER 11 ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS (ZONING)" BY
AMENDING SECTION 11.03, SUBD. 3.3. AND SECTION 11.30, SURD. 2. A. AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance amends City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subdivision
3.J.1. and 2., and by adding a new 4., to clarify regulations pertaining to outside storage and
display in Industrial and Commercial Districts.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1991.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
Village Knolls
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1991, by ARGUS
DEVELOPMENT INC., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETII:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept of 68 single family
lots and one outlot on 42.7 acres within two construction phases; underlying Planned Unit Development District
Review on 8.7 of said 42.7 acres, with waivers, and Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District
on said 8.7 acres; and Preliminary Plat of said 42.7 acres into 23 single family lots, two outlots and road right-
of-way for construction of 23 single family homes to be known as Village Knolls, all said 42.7 acres situated
in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part
hereof, said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #21-90-PUD-9-90, Developer
covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows:
I. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and
dated November 29, 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 4, 1990,
and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer
at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. STREET VACATION: Concurrent with and as part of the final plat for Phase I of the
Property, Developer shall submit to the City a petition to vacate that portion of Chesholm Lane
as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
4. UTILITY/STREET PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans
for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, erosion control, and storm sewer
for the Property, with storm sewer for Phase I of the Property to be directed to Homeward Hills
Road.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those
improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
5. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT: Prior to any construction or development of any development
phase of the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City
Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for such development phase. Said permits shall
L';"
include mitigation of tree loss for each phase, among other conditions and requirements.
Developer acknowledges that the total inventory of trees to be removed from all the Property is
614 caliper inches and, therefore, Developer agrees, as part of the land alteration permit for the
Property, as follows:
A. Tree replacement requirement per City Code of 300 caliper inches for all the Property.
Developer shall replace 100 caliper inches of trees within development Phase I of the
Property and shall replace 200 caliper inches of trees within development Phase II.
B. For each development phase of the Property, Developer shall submit to the City, and
obtain the City's approval of a security in an amount sufficient to cover tree replacement
that phase, in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Chapter 11.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be
implemented, said land alteration permit, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with
the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
6. FORESTATION IN CONSERVANCY AREA: Developer acknowledges that, in addition to
the planting of trees required by the tree preservation portion of the City Code, Developer shall
be required to plant additional trees in the area designated as "proposed wooded area" located
along the south sides of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2, of Phase II, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached
hereto.
Prior to release of any land alteration permit for said Phase H, Developer agrees to submit to the
Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval of a forestation plan for the
"proposed wooded area" which shall include details regarding species, quantity, size, and
location of all trees to be planted for reforestation purposes. Developer agrees to use species of
trees indigenous to the lowland areas of the Property.
Developer further agrees to submit to the City, and obtain the City's approval of a security in
an amount sufficient to cover 150% of the cost of such forestation, which shall remain in place
for one full year beyond the date of planting of such trees, or until such time as such trees have
survived one growing season, whichever is greater.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be
implemented, said forestation plan, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance with
the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
7. REMOVAL OF EXISTING WELL, SEPTIC SYSTEM, AND OUT-BUILDINGS: Prior to
issuance by City of any permit for land alteration, grading or building on the Property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief Building
Official's approval of, plans for demolition and/or removal of all existing structures, septic
systems, and wells on the Property, except the existing house and garage on Lot 3, Block I, as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the
amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee the restoration of the Property to grade.
7
City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the demolition or removal is
completed and after it is verified by City that the structures, well, and septic system have been
properly demolished or removed and that the Property has been restored to grade.
8. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for
land alteration, grading or construction within Phase II of the Property, Developer shall submit
to the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, and obtain the Director's approval
of detailed plans for:
A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk to be located along the west side of the public road,
as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
B. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail from Homeward Hills Road, westerly to the bridge
at Purgatory Creek, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said trail location shall
preserve natural vegetation, not to exceed a 10% grade, and shall be located outside of
- the natural drainage swale. Developer shall be responsible for locating a sign at
Homeward Hills Road indicating the trail entrance. Developer further acknowledges that
no permit for building construction shall be issued by City for Phase II of the Property
until such time as the trail is constructed.
Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, Developer agrees
to construct, or cause to be constructed, said sidewalk and trail, as approved by the Director,
concurrent with grading and utility construction on the Property, and in accordance with the
terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
9. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code
requirements within the R1-13.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review
for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD 9-90:
A. Waiver from driveway setback from a lot line for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, of Phase!, to
allow for driveways closer than three (3) ft. to a side lot line, in order that such lots may
share common driveways.
B. Waiver from minimum lot size requirements for Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, and for Lots
3, 4, and 5, Block 2, of Phase Ito allow for a lot size smaller than 13,500 sq. ft.
C. Waiver from mimimum lot frontage for Lot 3, Block 1, and for Lots 6 and 7, Block 2,
all in Phase I, to allow for lot frontage of less than 85 ft.
10. FUTURE REVIEW OF PHASE II REQUIRED: Developer and City acknowledge that
Planned Unit Development Concept approval, only, has been granted for Phase II of the Property
and that Developer must return to the City for formal review of at least the following items prior
to platting, utility or street construction, or building permit issuance within said Phase II:
Preliminary Plat, Zoning District Amendment, PUD District Review.
Village Knolls
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN
ARGUS DEVELOPMENT, INC.
AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1991, by and between HUSTAD
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City":
For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance #21-90-PUD-9-90, amending the
zoning of the property owned by Owner within the R1-13.5 District to the PUD #21-90-R1-13.5 District, as
more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of , 1991, by and
between Argus Development, Inc., a Minnesota general corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as
follows:
1. If Argus Development, Inc.,BDD Partnership fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's
Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the rezoning of the
property to Rural.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns
of the property.
3. If Owner transfers such property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring
that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Village Knolls
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #21-90
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING
OF LAND WMIIN THE R1-13.5 ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1
AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made A part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the R1-13.5
Zoning District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within
the R1-13.5 Zoning District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section
11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted
in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
Agreement dated as of March 19, 1991, entered into between Argus Development, Inc., a Minnesota, and the
City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, between Hustad
Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of March 19, 1991,
which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of
December, 1990, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council
of said City on the 19th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1991.
EXHIBIT A
P.U.D. CONCEPT REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
The West 760.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter and the North 300.00
feet of the South 800.00 feet of the West Half of the South 3/4 of
the Southeast Quarter all being in Section 26, Township 116, Range
22, and Lots 1 through 11, Block 1, Lots 1 through 14, Block 2,
Outlot C and Outlot D, all being in Bluffs West as platted and of
record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, excepting therefrom the plat of Bluffs West 7th
Addition.
P.U.D. DISTRICT REVIEW AND ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENT
That part of the North 300.00 feet of the South 800.00 feet of the West
Half of the south 3/4 of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township
116, Range 22, and that part of Lots 1 through 11, Block 1, and that
part of Outlot C, Bluffs West as platted and of record in the office of
the County Recorders, Hennepin County, Minnesota excepting therefrom
the plat of Bluffs West 7th Addition described as follows:
Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 26;
thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 23 minutes 57
seconds West, along the north-south quarter line, 163.03 feet
to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 0 degrees
23 minutes 57 seconds west, a distance of 864.54 feet; thence
South 84 degrees 59 minutes 38 seconds East; a distance of
169.97 feet; thence South 56 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds
east, a distance of 143.54 feet; thence South 48 degrees 51
minutes 55 seconds East, a distance of 278.92 feet; thence
South 35 degrees 34 minutes 22 seconds East, a distance of
68.84 feet; thence South 23 degrees 28 minutes 16 seconds
East, a distance of 74.51 feet; thence South 0 degrees 20
minutes 21 seconds East, a distance of 69.16 feet; thence
South 7 degrees 49 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of
72.85 feet; thence South 32 degrees 38 minutes 43 seconds
West, a distance of 427.60 feet; thence South 79 degrees 08
minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 328.14 feet to the
point of beginning.
Subject to easement of record and portions taken for streets.
Village Knolls
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-70
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE 21-90 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 21-90 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of March, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 21-90, which is attached hereto,
is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public
of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no
smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minn. State. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by
any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy
of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 21-90 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with
proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said
publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 19th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
John D. Frane, City Clerk
'
Village Knolls
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 21-90
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
THE ZONING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN THE R1-13.5 DISTRICT AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.9,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance amends the zoning of land within the R1-13.5 Zoning
District located east of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive subject to the terms and
conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full
legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1991.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-67
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
I.C. 52-223
Bluffs East 8th Storm Sewer Improvements
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from
the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said
improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City
Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall
prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City
Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of H.T.P.O.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to
publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a
contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City
Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's
official newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
•••.,
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council
t
o
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
with making the following described improvements:
(General Location)
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
X
Storm. Sewer
Bluffs East Eighth Addition
Street Paving
Other
Pursuant'to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby w
a
i
v
e
a
n
y
public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further s
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be speci
a
l
l
y
a
s
-
sessed against the property described below in accordance wit
h
t
h
e
City's special assessment policies. We further understand th
a
t
t
h
e
preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is$24,020.00
Street Address or other Legal
Description of Property to be Served
Names and addresses of Petitioners
(Must be owners of record)
Outlots C, E, F, G, H E and I of
Creek Knolls Addition and Outlot
C of Bluffs East Sixth Addition
Creek Knolls Partnership
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project NO.
Council Consideration
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-69
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
I.C. 52-224
Bluffs West 9th Street and Utility Improvements
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from
the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said
improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City
Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall
prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City
Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of H.T.P.O.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to
publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a
contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City
Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's
official newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
tz:`
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property described
below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed
with making the following described improvements:
(General Location)
X Sanitary Sewer Bluffs West 9th Addition (see attached)
X Watermain
X Storm Sewer
X Street Paving
Other
11 11 11 11 11
11
11 11 11
Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any
public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and
agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially as-
sessed against the property described below in accordance with the
City's special assessment policies. We further understand that the
preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is $215,888.50
Street Address or other Legal
Description of Property to be Served
Names and addresses of Petitioners
(Must be owners of record)
Cutlots B & C of Bluffs West 7th Addition Busted Development Corporation
72160 REERE-15 e -
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(For city Use)
Date Received
Project No.
Council Consideration
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-68
RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION
OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
I.C. 52-225
Cedar Ridge Estates 2nd Street & Utility Improvements
BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council:
1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from
the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said
improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property.
2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City
Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall
prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City
Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of H.T.P.O.
3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to
publish a copy of this esolution once in the official newspaper, and further a
contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City
Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's
official newspaper.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property described
below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed
with making the following described improvements:
(General Location)
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Scorn-Sewer
Street Paving
Other
Cedar Ridge Second Addition
per the attached preliminary
layout
Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any
public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and
agree that the total cost of said Improvements shall be specially as-
sessed against the property described below in accordance with the
City's special assessment policies. We further understand that the
preliminary, estimated total cost for the said Improvements is
Street Address or other Legal
Description of Property to be Served
See Attached
Names and addresses of Petitioners
(Must be owners of record)
r e c 1:47 • .4.,4
Harry A. Roger, Fee Owner ,
9100 Elt.n Prairie Road, Eden Prairie, MN
JAWUSHOT, Pughaser under Contract for Dee(
300 S. Hwy. 169, St. Louis Park, MN
by Lee W. Johnson, V.P./Project Manager
(For City Use)
Date Received -3— /Z— 7/
Project No.
Council Consideration
*
A COMMENDATION
from the
CITY COUNCIL
of the
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie community encourages and supports its youth in
organized, competitive activities; and
WHEREAS, the skills and values attained by participation in these activities help
students to become responsible residents of Eden Prairie and of the nation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to recognize excellence in achievements made by
Eden Prairie students;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie commends the
EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS GYMNASTICS TEAM
for its First-Place finish in the 1991 Minnesota Class AA State Tournament.
The Council congratulates the Team for its fine achievement and applauds the positive
recognition that team members have brought to Eden Prairie.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
on behalf of the City Council
Richard Anderson
Jean Harris
H. Martin Jessen
Patricia Pidcock
SEAL:
457Z.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Natalie Swaggert, Director of Human Resources & Services
SUBJECT: Requirement to Provide Hepatitis B Vaccination to at Risk Employees
The Federal Government and State of Minnesota have adopted new Occupational
Safety and Health Administration policies covering occupations with a risk of
exposure to blood-borne diseases. One disease, Hepatitis B, is of key concern
and has prompted development of new policies that require employers to do the
following:
1. Identify employees in risk occupations.
2. Notify these employees of their risk and offer them Hepatitis B
vaccinations.
3. Pay for the Hepatitis B vaccinations of those who elect to
participate.
The City has completed steps 1 & 2 and has identified 92 employess including
volunteer fire fighters who wish to receive the vaccination.
In order to provide the vaccinations efficiently and minimize costs, staff is
recommending that Eden Prairie work cooperatively with other metro area cities
and contract with the Bloomington Public Health Department to provide this
service.
By purchasing the vaccine in volume we will be able to provide the three part
vaccination series for $140.00 per employee. This results in a total cost of
$12,880.00. Because the requirement to provide this service was unknown during
the 1991 budget process there is no provision for this expense in the current
budget.
At this time staff is requesting that the Council do the following:
I. Approve the necessary funds ($12,880.00) to cover this expense.
2. Approve subject to confirmation by the City Attornery, the attached
Agreement between the Cities of Bloomington and Eden Prairie for
Provision of Hepatitis B vaccine.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON
AND FOR
PROVISION OF HEPATITIS B VACCINE
This Agreement made this day of
1991, by and between the City of Bloomington ("Bloomington") and
the City of
("
ft ;
WHEREAS, Hepatitis B is an infection of the liver caused by
the hepatitis B virus; and
WHEREAS, each year approximately 300,000 persons in the United
States are afflicted with hepatitis B, more than 10,000 persons
require hospitalization and an estimated 250 people die from the
disease; and
WHEREAS, persons who may be at risk of acquiring hepatitis B
due to their job responsibilities include such governmental
employees as nurses, paramedics, law enforcement personnel, and
firefighters; and
WHEREAS, a key strategy for preventing the spread of hepatitis
B is to vaccinate individuals with a high risk of infection; and
WHEREAS, Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health,
has agreed to vaccinate employees of approximately 24
municipalities in order to minimize infection with hepatitis B;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the
convenants thereinafter set forth, agree as follows:
1. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health,
will administer the Hepatitis B vaccine to any employee of
who consent to be vaccinated. Each
employee requesting immunization shall be required to sign a
-2-
Consent Form, which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A, prior
to being vaccinated.
2. Bloomington shall administer three (3) separate vaccines
for each employee.
3. shall pay
Bloomington the sum of One Hundred and Forty Dollars ($140.00) for
each employee consenting to be vaccinated. On or before a date to
be determined by Bloomington,
shall remit to Bloomington the total amount of compensation from
all employees of who have consented to
be vaccinated. It is understood and agreed that such compensation
from all employees of who have
consented must be paid prior to Bloomington dispensing the vaccine.
4. Bloomington will conduct the vaccination program at ten
to fifteen (10-15) separate clinics. Bloomington shall inform
of the location of each clinic and
provide a schedule for administration of the vaccine.
5. Bloomington shall provide to
a report confirming that the consenting employees of
received the Hepatitis B vaccine on three separate occasions.
6. It shall be the responsibility of
to insure that its employees requesting immunization utilize the
available clinics at the designated times. Bloomington shall not
refund any payments to for employees
who are not vaccinated because they failed to appear at a clinic
during the times when the vaccine was being administered.
5
-.3-
7. Except as to negligence or intentional misconduct in the
keeping, handling, storage and administration of the Hepatitis B
vaccine, shall indemnify and
hold harmless Bloomington, its officials, agents and employees from
and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses arising out of
or resulting from administration of the Hepatitis B vaccine
pursuant to this Agreement. The parties agree that the provisions
of this paragraph shall not be construed as a waiver by either
party of the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 466.
To the extent that, in any situation in which the indemnity is
applicable, Bloomington would have been entitled to contribution or
indemnification from parties manufacturing, processing or
distributing any items or material used in connection with
administration of the vaccine, including the vaccine, Bloomington
agrees to assign such indemnity or right of contribution to
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
By:
Its Mayor
By:
Its Manager
CITY OF
By:
Its Mayor
By:
Its
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-71
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer through HTPO has prepared plans and specifications for the
following improvements to wit:
I.C. 52-212 - Eden Hills Neighborhood Utility and Street Improvements
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL THAT:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in
the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for 2 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., April 11, 1991, at City Hall after which
time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will
then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday,
April 16, 1991, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, hid
bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of
such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
'52 Li
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-62
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 19th day of February, 1991, fixed the
19th day of March, 1991, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed
improvements:
I.C. 52-203 - Staring Lane/Ridge Road Street & Utility Improvements
WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council Hearing through two weekly publications
of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 19th day of March, 1991, at
which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered.
2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is
hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvements, with the assistance of RCM, consulting engineers.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
5
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 01-39
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF CUB FOODS
FOR SUPER VALU STORES, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Cub Foods for Super Valu Stores, Inc., dated March 12, 1991,
consisting of 11.75 acres into one lot, one outlot and road right of way, a copy of which is on
file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of March, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
(7 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING VARIANCE REQUEST
#91-007
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments
will meet at the following time and places:
7:30 PM
Thursday, March 14, 1991 - Continued to April 11. 1991
At the Council Chambers, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden
Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
to review and consider the variance request #91-007, submitted by
Super Valu for property located at the northwest corner of 78th
Street and Prairie Center Drive and south of Leona Road. Eden
prairie, Minnesota, leciallY described as: See Reverse Side. The request is for a variance from City Code. Chapter 11 Section
11.03, Subdivision 2121_. al) to permit a front yard building setback
of 14.5 feet. City Code ..fecruires a 35' front yard setback. Section
.1.L-70 Sul—.----tivi.---.---.(--siorl 4 B 11 .--2--P----X--3divisi"Btoerm .t a Base Area Ratio of .237. City Code maximum Base Area Ratio is
2. ACp to permit wall signs on the west elevation of 493.86
square eet. City Code maximum permitted is 325 square feet.
to permit wall signs on the east elevation of 59 square feet. a City Code maximum permitted is 300 square feet. 5 to permit a
second free-standing sign of 80 square feet. City Code maximum
size sign for a second free-standing sign is 36 square feet. q...11 to permit two sign bases of 69.96 square feet. City Code maximum
sign base permitted is 40 square feet. 0 Section 11.50.
Subdivision 7A- to permit a structure 14,5' from a road right-of-
way. City Code requires a 50' setback according to the the
Shoreland Management Code. g? to permit impervious surface for the site greater than 30%. ty Code maximum impervious surface
coverage in a Shoreland area is 30%.
Written or oral comments relating to this variance request will be
heard at this meeting. Said variance application is on file for
public review at the Planning Department at Eden Prairie City Hall.
Published in the Eden Prairie News
City of Eden Prairie March 28. 1991
PH91007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Feb. 4, 1991
-4-
Lambert indicated that we have not had any problems
with their programs, and that we encourage their use
of our facilities and recognize the great service they
provide the metro area, including Eden Prairie.
MOTION: Vanderploeg moved to recommend that Edenwood
be offered a 50% discount on a family membership to
the Community Center and that the daily user fee be
wavied, as ARC provides a valuable service to families
in the Twin Cities who are in desperate need. Karpinko
seconded the motion and it passed 4-0.
V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
XI- A. Cub Foods
Refer to staff report dated January 25, 1991.
Cross reported that this site is located in the northeast
corner of W. 78th St. and Prairie Center Dr. The
developer is requesting a zoning change, site plan
review and preliminary plat. Two variances are necessary
because the setback will be less than 35' and for the
runoff to go to Anderson Lakes would require extending
the storm sewer and the construction of a storm water
pond.
the Commission discussed different styles of entrance
monuments, the first of which will be constructed on
the east building wall of Cub Foods. Cub Foods supports
this idea and is willing to construct the wall and
gateway monument. The wall, which would enclose loading
areas, is 50' x 18'.
Richard referred to the wooded outlot on the west side
of the site and asked if the City had any interest
in acquiring it for parkland. Cross said that it will
be developed by Cub Foods in the future.
The Commission discussed the landscape plan and questione
whether there would be sufficient plantings to screen
the building. Lambert said he did not feel it would
be unreasonable to request to see a profile of the
landscape plan. He added that staff could make a plan
with their recommendations on where future flower bed
plantings should be located and submit it to Cub Foods.
5'27;
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. 8, NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Feb. 4, 1991
-5-
MOTION: Richard moved to recommend approval of Cub
Foods with the requirement that a landscaping plan
be submitted to the Commission prior to the second
reading. Karpinko seconded the motion and it passed
4-0.
B. KMSP
Refer to staff report dated January 11, 1991.
Cross reported that this site is located in the northeast
quadrant at the intersection of Prairie Center Dr.
____and,Viking Dr._ There are no existing trees and the
sidewalks are already in place. The only concern was
the height of the tower. It was compared with other
towers in the area and found to be comparable.
Baker asked what the tree replacement requirement is
for areas that do not have existing trees. Cross said
there are screening requirements.
The Commission discussed several residential areas
in the City that have very few, if any, trees. They
talked about the possibility of a requirement for
homeowners similar to the one for businesses.
MOTION: Richard moved to recommend approval of KMSP
Corproate Headquarters per staff recommendation. Joyer
seconded the motion and it passed 4-0.
C. Amoco
Cross reported that this site is located at Edenvale
Crossings which is east of Mitchell Road and north
of McDonald's and Mexican Village.
The PUD was approved earlier, but the site plan was
not completed at that time.
MOTION: Joyer moved to recommend approval of Amoco
per staff recommendation. Richard seconded the motion
and it passed 4-0.
5'7(7
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
Page Three
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications
I.C. 52-203 (Street and Utility Improvements on Staring Lane
and Ridge Road) ResolutionNo. 91-62.
B. Cub Foods. Request of Super Valu Stores, Inc. fqr Zoning District
Change from R1-22 and PUB to C-Reg-Ser on 9.81 acres with variances
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Site Plan Review on 9.81
acres; Adoption of Resolution 91-39, Preliminary Plat of 11.57 acres
into 1 lot, outlot and road right-of-way for construction of a
73,000 square-foot building to be known as Cub Foods. Location:
Northwest corner of 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive, south of
Leona Road. (Resolution 91-39, Preliminary Plat; Ordinance 6-91,
Zoning District Change.) Continued from February 19, 1991.
C. Timber Lake Drive Townhomes. Request of the Pemtom Company
for Zoning District Amendment within the RM-2.5 Zoning District
on 2.11 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals; Site Plan Review on 2.11 acres for construction of 16
townhouse units in 4 buildings to be known as Timber Lake Drive
Townhomes. Location: Northeast corner of Timber Lake Drive and
Island Road. (Ordinance 8-91, Zoning District Amendment).
D. Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie. Request by Fairview
‘0, \
Hospital and Healthcare Services for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Industrial to Office on 7.3 Acres; Adoption of
Resolution 91-58, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 17.4
acres; Zoning District Change from Rural and 1-2 to Office on 2.9
acres; Site Plan Review on 2.9 acres for construction of a 15,200
square-foot medical health care clinic to he known as Fairview
Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie. Location: East of Prairie
Center Drive and south of Technology Drive. (Resolution 91-58, PUD
Concept Amendment; Ordinance 9-91, Zoning District Change). - .Q-D-r,--ieLecrt+cvrcco‘a--t
9! -lc ID
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
A. Public Discussion of Recommendation of City Hall Site Selection
Subcommittee.
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment to Human Rights & Services Commission (1-year term).
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 28. 1991
B. CUB FOODS (91-3-Z-P-SPR) Request of Super Valu Stores, Inc. for Zoning
District Change from R1-22 and PUB to C-Reg-Ser on 9.81 acres with variances
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Site Plan Review on 9.81 acres; and
Preliminary Plat of 11.57 acres into 1 lot, 1 outlot and road right-of-way for
construction of a 73,000 square foot building to be known as Cub Foods.
Location: Northwest corner of W. 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive, south of
Leona Road. A public hearing.
Pat Groeper, representing the proponent, thanked Staff for it's time, support, and
helpful suggestions to make this plan what it is today. Groeper stated that the 35-
foot setback could not be met along the loading dock area because of the
proponent's desire to completely enclose the dock area and, therefore, a variance
was being requested. The proponent would construct Road A. Road A was
proposed to align with the Eden Prairie Mall roadway so that signalization could
be installed when determined necessary. Truck traffic would have a right-in only
from 78th Street. Parking for 438 cars would be provided. Extensive
landscaping would be provided and a screening wall would be placed along Prairie
Center Drive to screen the building. The proponent requested the ability to move
some of the trees around the entrance to the loading dock area if necessary.
Groeper said that the cart corrals would also be screened with landscaping. A
small green space area would be located along 78th Street. Utilities would be
installed by the proponent. Groeper noted that the proponent would need to work
further with Staff on drainage issues. The proponent proposed to petition
the City to provide a feasibility study regarding the drainage problem. The
exterior facing the west would be largely glass. Soldier coarsing and a panel style
brick design would add character to the exterior of the building and help to mask
the size. The canopy would be a green color to match the Eden Prairie logo.
The dock area was as high as the building and was actually considered part of the
building.
Uram asked Groeper to comment on the construction schedule. Groeper replied
that the proponent would like to begin construction this spring or early summer
if the drainage issues could be resolved.
Dave Kirsch, representing the proponent, stated that the proponent had tried to
develop the project free of concerns. He noted that prior to the enclosure of the
loading dock area the plan was in compliance with all setback requirements.
Kirsch concurred that the drainage issue needed to be resolved before construction
can proceed.
Uram reported that Staff had been working with the proponent for approximately
a year on this project. Cub Foods would construct a commercial grade street and
dedicate the street to the City. The building space would be approximately
73,000 square feet. The setback variance was due to the enclosure of the loading
-
dock area. Uram recommended that the proponent petition the City for the
feasibility study regarding the drainage issues as soon as possible.
Uram stated that the signage package was important and noted that a maximum
of 325 square feet of signage would be allowed and additional signage would not
be permitted.
Uram recommended that the 6-foot evergreens be increased to 8, 10, and 12 foot
evergreens. He stated that the number of lights should be limited and the lighting
color needed to be consistent.
Sandstad asked if a ponding option had been considered regarding the drainage
problems. Uram replied that the only location for a pond would be in Oudot A,
which would not be feasible. He added that the storm drainage was currently
going into Eden Lake.
Norman asked what the Outlot was for and if it would be maintained by the
proponent. Groeper replied that the proponent believed that the Outlot would be
developed at a later date.
Norman asked if Leona Road would become a through street. Uram replied no,
because of the grade difference. Groeper added that the proponent would like to
see Leona Road vacated. Norman believed that safety would be improved in the
area if Leona Drive could become a through street. Groeper replied that Road A
would allow access to Leona Road from 78th Street.
Bye believed that the intersection at 78th Street would need to be signalized. She
noted that it was already difficult to get in and out of the office building adjacent
to this site. Bye asked when the trucks would make deliveries. Groeper replied
that the majority of trucks would deliver during the late evening hours which are
from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. and weekends.
Uram noted that the recommendation to enclose the trash compactor area should
be added to the recommendations. Groeper stated that the area would be
screened.
Dick Lynch, 11426 Leona Road, asked how wide the proposed Road A would be.
Groeper replied that the road would be 2 lanes (36-feet wide). Lynch asked what
type of sewer lines would be installed. Groeper replied that would be constructed
to City standards. Lynch asked who would pick up the cost to maintain Leona
Road. Uram replied that Leona Road was not proposed to be upgraded at this
time. Uram added that Cub Foods could not petition for the entire length of
Leona Road to be upgraded. Lynch believed that Leona Road was not capable of
handling traffic and questioned having an commercial Road A intersection with
Leona Road which was not upgraded. Lynch did not believe that Leona Road
would be petitioned for improvement.
Norman asked Lynch how he felt about Leona Road being upgraded. Lynch
replied that he did not want the improvements and especially did not want to be
responsible to pay for the improvement.
Uram noted that where the road would end was subjective at this point.
Lynch asked what screening would be provided along the northern boundary of
the parking lot. Groeper replied that the screening would be as presented on the
plan and noted that the parking lot was 4-to-5 feet lower than Leona Road.
Kirsch recommended consideration of ending Road A in a cul-de-sac.
Hallett asked if development in this area would be speeded up because of the Cub
Food store. Uram replied that development could not be predicted.
Lynch questioned the lighting to be used for the parking lot. Groeper replied that
the lighting would be downcast and would not spill onto adjacent property. She
added that the poles would be approximately 40 feet high.
Sandstad asked if Leona Road were upgraded if this would provide relief from
traffic on 78th Street. Uram replied that this project was not subject to the
upgrading of Leona Road.
Sandstad recommended that the exterior design be constructed as per the
proponents plan.
Ruebling asked what the time frame would be for the drainage studies. Uram
replied that as soon as the petition for the study was filed it would be given top
priority.
Ruebliog asked if additional landscaping could be provided along the front of the
building. Groeper replied that greenspace was not available in the front of the
building.
Ruebling asked if provision would be made for turn lanes on Road A. Uram
replied that turn lanes could be provided. Ruebling was concerned about stacking
at the intersection.
Ruebling asked if Leona Road could become a dead-end. Uram replied that this
would depend on what the City wanted to accomplish. Uram added that traffic
volumes might speed up the upgrade process. Ruebling added that he was
concerned about the wear and tear on Leona Road. Uram noted that upgrading
Leona Road would be a City Council decision; however, the Planning
Commission could make recommendations.
Norman believed that the proponent had presented a well thought out plan. She
recommended that Leona Road be upgraded.
Hallett did not support the upgrade of Leona Road if this would result as a cost
to Lynch. Uram noted that Staff was not recommending an upgrade. He noted
that if an upgrade were recommended as deferment of assessments may be
avilable for Lynch.
Hallett asked if Cub Foods was proposing anything different at this location
because the corporate headquarters were located here. Groeper replied that the
primary differences would be seen inside the store.
MOTION 1:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-
0-0.
MOTION 2:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council approval of
the request of Super Valu Stores, Inc., for Zoning District Change from R1-22
and Public to C-Reg-Ser on 9.81 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the
Board of Appeals, for construction of a Cub Foods store, based on plans dated
January 14, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
January 25, 1991, with the addition under Item D that a lighting plan be
submitted for the loading dock area and that the trash compactor be enclosed.
Motion carried 5-0-0.
MOTION 3:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council approval of
the request of Super Valu Stores, Inc., for Site Plan Review on 9.81 acres for
construction of a 73,000 sq. ft. Cub Foods store, based on plans dated January
14, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 25,
1991, with the addition under Item D that a lighting plan be submitted for the
loading dock area and that the trash compactor be enclosed. Motion carried 5-0-
0.
MOTION 4:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council approval of
the request of Super Valu Stores, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 11.57 acres into
one lot, one outlot, and road right-of-way for construction of a 73,000 sq. ft. Cub
Foods store, based on plans dated January 14, 1991, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated January 25, 1991, with the addition
under Item D that a lighting plan be submitted for the loading dock area and that
the trash compactor be enclosed. Motion carried 5-0-0.
:2,
c
MOT ION t
Norman moved, seconded by Bye to recommend to the City to initiate a study to
upgrade Leona Road to Street A. Motion carried 5-0-0.
Bye supported strongly the Public Safety memo.
53q
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
Donald R. Uram, Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
January 25, 1991
Cub Foods
Northwest corner of W. 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive, south of
Leona Road
APPLICANT: Super Valu Stores, Inc.
FEE OWNER: Turner Development
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from R1-22 and Public to C-Reg-Ser on
9.81 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals.
2. Site Plan Review on 9.81 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 11.75 acres into one lot, one outlot and road
right of way. nkk C:fiEg-SER N.;;;SOF
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Staff is recommending approval of the
Zoning District Change from R1-22 and
Public to C-Reg-Service to allow for the
construction of a 73,000 square foot Cub
Foods. This approval is based on the design
of the project and consistency with the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
Major development issues relating to this
project are identified as follows:
1. Land Use
The location of this site at the
intersection of Prairie Center Drive
and West 78th Street makes this
project highly visible. Because
of this high visibility, it could be
considered as a "gateway" site for the City of Eden Prairie. It could also be considered
as the eastern entrance to the Major Center Area (MCA). Site lines developed by the
proponent indicate that this project will be visible from approximately 1/2 mile to the east
on I-494.
Because of its location and high visibility, this site was previously envisioned as a
hotel/convention center or corporate office location. However, development plans for
this type of land use have not materialized because of market conditions. The current
proposal is for a Cub Foods grocery store, which is consistent with the Guide Plan
designation for a Regional Commercial land use. Due to the visual dominance of the site
and the question of "highest and best" land use, site planning and design are all issues.
2. Building Architecture
The following architectural and site planning techniques have been used to address the
possible negative aspects of the use and make them positive design features:
1. The building's primary material is facebrick.
2. The loading facilities are enclosed within the building.
3. The front, sides and rear of the building all utilize similar
architectural elements.
4. The landscape plan consists of 649.5 caliper inches of plant material and is
designed to screen the parking areas and "soften" the building mass.
5. All signage is coordinated. The pylon sign is designed to match the architecture
of the building.
6. All light standards will be coordinated with adjacent land uses. This
includes pole style and color, fixture type and lamp color.
7. Mechanical equipment will be screened by standing seam metal panels.
8. The front building elevation incorporates the use of glass and canopy columns.
9. The side and rear elevations use brick patterns and panel "reveals" to add detail
and break up the linearity and mass of the building.
10. Significant landscape islands are used within the parking lot for additional green
space.
In addition, staff has been working with Super Valu on a design for a "gateway
monument" into the MCA which would be placed on the enclosed loading facility wall.
By doing this, a possible negative aspect of the project has been turned into a positive
one.
3. Utilities
The existing storm sewer system in the area does not have the capacity to handle the
development of this project site. The attached Engineering memo discusses the need to
undertake an overall drainage study for this area to determine a solution. Because this
site falls between watersheds, a preliminary study indicates that the runoff should go to
Anderson Lakes. In addition to extending the storm sewer, the construction of a
stormwater pond will also be necessary. The City will be initiate the study; however, a
petition from Super Valu to do the work is suggested. Presenting a petition will enable
the City to speed up the feasibility report process.
4. Traffic/Leona Road
A previous traffic study for this site based on 104,075 square feet, which included a
67,600 square foot Cub Foods, was projected to generate 11,764 daily trips and 911 trips
the p.m. peal hour. The current proposal is projected to generate 10,744 daily trips and
798 trips in the p.m. peak hour. The projected traffic volumes will not significantly
effect the level of service at adjacent intersections.
Leona Road, which is currently unimproved, abuts this property to north. Because Leona
Road provides access to other properties in the area, a special assessment agreement is
required for future upgrading. This agreement would become void if all parties agreed
to vacate. Cub Foods has dedicated 70 feet of right of way and will construct Street "A"
between Leona Road and West 78th Street.
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this site and surrounding sites as Regional Commercial.
Specific land uses and zoning classifications in the area include the Super 8 Motel, zoned C-
Highway to the west; Welsh Companies, zoned Office to the east; First Bank, zoned Office to
the south; and vacant property, zoned R1-22 to the north.
The proponent is requesting a Zoning District Change from R1-22 and Public to C-Reg-Ser to
allow for the construction of a 73,000 square foot Cub Foods grocery store.
LAND USE
Due to the location of this project at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and West 78th
Street, it is a highly visible site. Also, its location is important because it is at the entrance to
the MCA. These two factors made the site desirable as a hotel/convention center or corporate
office. Plans for this type of land use have not materialized, and now Cub Foods is proposing
a 73,000 square foot grocery store.
A grocery store is an allowable land use within the Regional Commercial Guide Plan
designation. Because of this, the approval of this project is not based on the land use alone but
on architectural and site planning issues which can make this an appropriate use. These include
the screening of loading facilities from Prairie Center Drive, 1-494 and the adjacent land uses.
It also includes the treatment of other grocery store operations such as truck loading and
unloading, parking, storage of palettes and recycling bins.
SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT
1. The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of the 11.56 acre site into one lot, one outlot
and road right of way. Lot 1, the location of Cub Foods, is an 8.59 acre site, while the
outlot to the west of Street "A" will contain 1.75 acres. Dedicated right of way of 1.22
acres includes an additional 10 feet for Leona Road to the north and 70 feet for Street
"A".
2. Cub Foods is proposing a 73,000 square foot store on the 8.59 acre site at a Base Area
Ratio (B.A.R.) of 19.5%. City Code allows 20%. A total of 438 parking spaces are
required at a parking ratio of six spaces per 1000 square feet. The site plan depicts a
total of 440 parking spaces.
3. Building and parking areas meet the minimum setback requirements for the C-Reg-Ser
Zoning District with the exception of the building setback along the east property line.
This is considered a front yard which requires a 35 foot setback. In order to screen the
loading facilities from Prairie Center Drive and 1-494, the building was designed to
enclose them. Because the loading facilities are enclosed rather than open docks, the
building comes within 14.5 feet of a point along the east property line. A variance to
allow this is necessary.
4. Access to this site will be from West 78th Street, Street "A" and Leona Road, which is
currently unimproved. Access from West 78th Street will be a right-in only for trucks
to provide service to the loading dock area to the rear of the building. Street "A"
provides two full access points and is designed with a 70 foot right of way and a 36 foot
pavement width according to commercial standards. Street "A" aligns with the access
to the Eden Prairie Center directly to the south so that this intersection could be
signalized in the future if warranted.
5. Because Leona Road provides access to adjacent properties, a special assessment
agreement signed by Cub Foods is necessary for future upgrading (see attached
Engineering Memo).
BUILDING ARCIIITECTURE
The Cub Foods store is designed to be rectangular in shape and is approximately 210 feet wide
and 320 feet long. The majority of the building is 24 feet in height. Because of the size and
linearity of the building, the architect has attempted to provide architectural relief on all building
elevations. The front building elevation is designed with an enclosed cart area similar to
Rainbow Foods and includes a 12 foot canopy. There are also columns and brick soldier
coursing which add interest to the building. The other building elevations have been designed
with relief created by 1/2 inch reveals at spaced intervals on the building. Due to the length and
size of the building, I/2 inch reveals may appear insignificant from a distance. This could be
resolved by "anchoring" the building at the corners. To do this, staff recommends that two, 6"-
12" pilasters be placed at each corner of the building. This includes one pilaster on the corner
and one spaced a specified distance from the corner matching the distance between reveals. Also
adding to the architectural variety are brick soldier courses, corbaling and spectraglaze accents
at the corners. Primary building materials include face brick, rock faced block along the base
of the building and a dryvit stucco canopy.
The building is placed in an east/west direction with the front of the building facing Street "A".
Because of this, the loading facilities face 1-494 and Prairie Center Drive. Site lines indicate that
the loading facilities are visible from all directions. To resolve this issue, the building has been
designed to enclose the loading and service area. This architectural treatment is similar to that
used for Lunds. By enclosing the loading facility, a wall approximately 230 feet in length is
located within 20 feet of the east property line. To take advantage of its high visibility, staff is
proposing that a section of the wall become the first location for a "gateway monument" to the
MCA. This would be accomplished by using about 800 square feet as a design feature
identifying this area as Eden Prairie's "downtown". (see Entrance Monument memo)
Rooftop mechanical equipment units are proposed to be screened by standing seam metal panels.
GRADING
Elevations on this site range from a high point of 900 in the northeast comer and the center of
the site to a low point of 880 in the southeast corner. The site generally slopes from the north
to the south. Due to the size of the building and parking areas, the entire project site will be
graded. In order to construct the building pad and parking areas, a maximum ten foot cut will
occur in the northeast corner. To do this, three, two foot retaining walls are proposed in the
northeast corner to make up the grade difference. Minimal grading is required within City right
of way for Prairie Center Drive to construct the project and install utilities. For screening
purposes, a series of berms three to six feet in height are proposed around the perimeter of the
site. A permit will be required for grading on City property in order to construct Street "A".
Off-site grading is also proposed on the church property. Permission must be received from the
landowner to complete this grading.
UTILITIES
Water and sanitary sewer services are available to this project site. There is an existing 12"
water line and a 8" sanitary sewer line within West 78th Street. These services will be extended
north in Street "A" to Leona Road to provide utility services to those properties to the north.
Connections will also be made to service the proposed Cub Foods building and any building
constructed on Outlot A.
53 7
Although there is a storm sewer system within this area, the storm water calculations have
indicated that there is not enough capacity to handle the proposed storm water runoff from this
site. (See attached Engineering memo.)
LANDSCAPING
Based on the size and height of the building, 456 caliper inches of plant materials are required
for landscaping. In addition, there is 181 caliper inches of significant tree removal on the project
which requires 100% replacement. The landscape plan provides for 649.5 caliper inches of plant
material which meets the City Code requirement. The plan is designed primarily for the
screening of the parking areas from Leona Road, West 78th Street and Street "A"
The actual loading facilities will be screened by enclosing them within the building, while the
entrance and exit doors will be screened by the extension of a screening fence. The landscape
plan has taken into consideration the softening of this element of the building by providing plant
material along the base of the building and screening wall. Because the loading facilities are
open ended, it is possible to see into this area from Suburban Place office south across West 78th
Street. Although you may not see the actual truck docks, it may be possible to see other
activities such as pallet storage, recycling bins and other items associated with a grocery store.
Also, any parked trucks waiting to enter the loading facility will be visible along the south
building elevation. To help screen this activity, staff recommends that the 6 foot evergreens to
the east of the right-in only be replaced with 8, 10 and 12 foot evergreens and final locations be
subject to field location for most effective screening.
OUTSIDE STORAGE
The approval of this project is not only based on land use but on architectural and site planning
issues. As mentioned, these include the screening of loading facilities and also the treatment of
other grocery store operations such as truck loading and unloading, parking, storage of palettes
and recycling bins. To ensure that these items do not become problems, staff recommends that
Cub Foods acknowledge the following operating requirements with respect to the Property:
I. All forward-buy (bulk storage of a certain product) shall be enclosed within the building.
At no time shall any bulk storage items be stored in any other location on the Property.
This includes a unattached semi-tractor trailer.
2. All pallets are to be stored within the enclosed loading facility. At no time shall pallets
be stored in any other location on the Property, nor shall such pallets be stacked so as to
be visible.
3. No sidewalk displays of materials, goods, supplies, equipment or any other item
associated with the use shall be allowed.
4. No truck parking shall occur anywhere on the site.
q",z7
Cub Foods shall agree to such operating requirements as part of the overall approval for the
Property. They also acknowledge that any violation of any of said requirements will cause
irreparable harm to the City of Eden Prairie and Cub Foods specifically acknowledges that City
may seek to enforce said requirements by temporary restraining order or temporary injunction,
as well as by all other remedies allowed to the City by law. In addition, Cub Foods agrees to
pay all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, which are incurred by the City in enforcing
said conditions.
TRAFFIC
A traffic study was conducted in May, 1990 for First Western Development who originally
proposed a Cub Foods on this site. The traffic study was based on a total of 104,075 square feet
of building including a 67,600 square foot Cub Foods and a 36,475 square feet of retail space.
Using the trip generation rates from the study, staff estimated the daily trips and the a.m./p.m.
peak hour trips for the current proposal. Based on these figures, the daily trip generation would
be reduced from 11,794 for the original proposal to 10,744 for the current proposal. A
reduction in the number of trips in the a.m. peak hour from 119 10 77 and in the p.m. peak hour
from 911 to 798 are also projected. Based on the existing traffic study, the projected traffic
volumes for the current proposal will not significantly affect the level of service at adjacent
intersections.
The Eden Prairie Police Department has submitted a memo concerning the effect of this project
on the intersections of U.S. 169/West 78th Street and U.S. 169/Leona Road (see attached). The
traffic study conducted for First Western Development indicated a trip distribution for that
proposal of 10% for the Leona Road/ U.S. 169 intersection, while 25% would use the West 78th
Street/U.S. 169 intersection. All others would use West 78th Street/Prairie Center Drive
intersection. The purpose of the street connection between Leona Road and West 78th Street is
to provide an alternative for those vehicles which currently have to use the Leona Road/U.S. 169
intersection. The development of this project and the associated street connection will help to
alleviate the traffic congestion at the Leona Road/U.S. 169 intersection.
SHORELAND ORDINANCE
This site is located within 1000 feet of Anderson Lakes and is subject to shoreland regulations.
The regulation affecting this site is a maximum 30% impervious surface. The Cub Foods
proposal is approximately 80%. Past variances have been approved based on the mitigation of
the effect of stormwater run-off on adjacent wetlands. The overall drainage study will have to
take this factor into consideration.
LIGIITING
Plans indicate lighting standards of 40 feet in height. Because of the difference in lighting
standards used throughout the community, staff recommends that the lights used for this project
match those existing in the area. This would include pole color, fixture type and lamp
illumination color.
SIDEWALKS
There is an existing 8 foot bituminous trail on the north ace of West 78th Street. Concurrent
with the construction of Street "A", a five foot concrete s,zewalk will be constructed along both
sides of Street "A". The site plan shall be revised to ;77.-.--.de connections from the proposed
sidewalks to the building.
SIGNAGE
Cub Foods is proposing two signs for this project. This '_:c:udes a front building sign which is
proposed at 296.26 square feet. The Code allows for a 7_-.v.mum sign size of 300 square feet.
A sign of this size will prohibit the addition of any other szl along the front building elevation.
The floor plans for the building indicate a separate bank 3--xl pharmacy. It is anticipated that
these tenants will want signage in the future. City Code sz.nes that for multi-tenant buildings,
wall area is computed for each tenant based on the e=-.or wall area of the space that is
occupied. The bank has an exterior wall area of 168 sc:-.L-e feet. This would allow for a sign
area of 25 square feet. Staff recommends a sign pacla2e :e developed for the bank, pharmacy
and Cub Foods with a maximum size of 325 square
Cub Foods is also proposing a pylon sign located at the .:::ersection of West 78th Street and
Street ""A. The sign is designed at the code maximum of i .C1 square feet. In order to meet other
Code requirements, the sign must be reduced in width to 18" maximum, and the sign base
to a maximum of 40 square feet. In addition, staff 7..^o. mmends that the pylon sign be
redesigned to match the building architecture.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of a Zoning District Chan:. fr:..,m RI-22 and Public to C-Reg-Ser
on 9.81 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board C Appeals; Site Plan Review on 9.81
acres; and Preliminary Plat of 11.75 acres into one lot, o outlot and road right of way subject
to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the re71-_,:t. ment of 6 foot evergreens by 8, 10
and 12 foot evergreens along the south ding, east of the right-in only for
screening purposes.
B. Submit a comprehensive sign package :".:r e bank, pharmacy and Cub Foods
detailing size, color, letter style and on the building. The size of all
signs shall not exceed 325 square feet. 7e sign package will be approved with
no further signage allowed unless the approved plan.
C. Redesign the pylon to meet the City Cock: requirements of a maximum 18" in
width and a 40 square foot maximum sg. ise. The sign shall be designed to be
architecturally compatible with the bui:,-;.±4.
D. Provide a detailed lighting plan depicting pole type and color, fixture type and
lamp illumination color.
E. Submit material building colors and samples.
F. Provide sidewalk connections to the building.
2. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Receive permission from the church and City for grading off-site.
B. Stake the grading limits with an erosion control fence.
C. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading.
3. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the
Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans for review
by the City Engineer.
4. Sign a special assessment agreement with the City for the upgrading of Leona Road. This
agreement will become null and void if all parties agree to vacate the existing right- -6
way.
5. Submit a petition to the City requesting an overall drainage study for the area to resolve
the stormwater capacity problem.
6. Apply for and receive a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for a
setback less than 35 feet from Prairie Center Drive. Mitigation for the reduced setback
will be the construction of the enclosed loading facility, screening fence and landscaping.
7. Apply for and receive a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to allow
for an impervious surface greater than 30% within a shoreland area.
8. Provide and construct "gateway monument" sign for the City. This is a building design
element which is partial mitigation for the building setback variance.
9. Agree to the terms listed in the Outside Storage section.
-MEMORANDUM-
TO: Planning Commission
TIEROUGH: Alan Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Mary Krause
DATE: January 24, 1991
SUBJECT: Engineering Comments
STORM SEWER
We recommend that a feasibility study be conducted on the storm sewer system for the Cub
Foods site and adjacent areas for the following reasons:
1. A comprehensive storm sewer system for the Cub Foods site as well as adjacent
undeveloped areas is needed. The existing storm sewer systems adjacent to these
areas do not have hydraulic capacity to handle the run-off that will be generated
when these areas are developed.
a. The storm sewer system in West 78th Street that leads to Prairie Center
Drive eventually outlets into Eden Lake. The contributing drainage area
to Eden Lake does not include any of the Cub Foods site or adjacent
areas. This existing storm sewer system is currently operating at its
design capacity with regards to the Eden Lake water levels. Additional
flow could raise the water level of Eden Lake, affecting the 100-year
flood elevations.
b. The storm sewer located in Prairie Center Drive north of West 78th Street
flows north to Lake Smetana. The drainage area for this system does not
include any of the Cub Foods site.
2. The majority of the Cub Foods site is designated as a contributing drainage area
to Anderson Lakes.
3. The proposed storm sewer system for the Cub Foods site utilizes temporary on-
site storage of the storm water within the parking lot area before discharge into
the storm sewer. This temporary water storage would take place near the front
of the parking lot where the highest density of parked vehicles would be.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LEONA ROAD
An assessment agreement is recommended for future improvements to Leona Road along the
north boundary of the site. Improvements to this street segment may be necessary to
accommodate development at abutting property north of Leona. Improvements would benefit
the Cub Food site as well as other properties. Future assessments to the Cub Food site would
be based on one-half the cost of the street section constructed. The appropriate street section
would be based on the proposed abutting land use.
TRAFFIC
Public Safety is concerned with the traffic capacity of the unsignalized intersections at Leona
Road and West 78th Street with TH 169. The Engineering Division will coordinate review of
these intersections with MnDOT.
CONCLUSION:
A. It is recommended that a comprehensive storm sewer system be studied for the Cub
Foods site as well as adjacent undeveloped areas. The City of Eden Prairie will initiate
the study. To speed this process up, we suggest that Cub Foods sign a petition
requesting that the City of Eden Prairie undertake this Feasibility Study.
This study should include:
1. Drainage areas
2. Sedimentation or treatment of storm water
3. Possible alignment for storm sewer placement
4. Storm sewer sizing
5. Outlet
B. Intersections of Leona Road and W. 78th Street will be reviewed with MnDOT.
C. An assessment agreement for Leona Road is recommended.
City of Eden Prairie
City Offices
7600 Executive Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-2262
March 1, 1991
Ms. Pat Groeper
Super Valu Stores, Inc.
101 Jefferson Avenue So.
Hopkins, MN 55343
Subject: Cub Foods Variances
-
Dear Ms. Groeper:
Variances are reviewed between the 1st and 2nd Reading at the City Council. Cub Food
variances are scheduled for the April 11, 1991 meeting. A public hearing notice outlining all
the variances is enclosed for your review. The following information will be needed from you:
1. A letter to the Board members supporting variance items #2 through #6.
2. Nine sets of the proposed sign plan for east elevation.
Please call me if you need further clarification.
Sincerely,
Steve Durham
Zoning Administrator
GROEPER2.SD:bs
("nnesota Department of Tranaporti,"
Metropolitan District
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
Telephone No
Reply to
593 -8753
February 6, 1991
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
7000 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer To:
C.S. 2745 TH 169
Cub Foods @ SE Quadrant of I-494/TH 169
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further
development with consideration of the following comments:
If current drainage patterns and runoff rates are maintained, the proposal will
not affect highway drainage. The proposal should be reviewed by the Nine
Mile Creek and Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed Districts.
The proposal may be inconsistent with planned 1-494 highway improvements.
Specifically, the proposal conflicts with the proposed 1-494 eastbound off-ramp
to Prairie Center Drive in that the proposed ramp may encroach upon the
Cub Foods parking area. Coordination of this local action with planned
Mn/DOT 1-494 highway improvements is recommended.
The City should be aware that the proposal could generate up to 13,500 daily
trips and up to 1,400 trips/hour during peak use periods. These figures were
calculated using the 4th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Handbook.
,....MINNESOTA
1990
An Equ.:,' 0:ro-turfly es'a
Chris Enger
February 6, 1991
Page Two
Please note that the figures assume parking is available to accommodate the
trips generated by a supermarket with the proposed square footage.
If you have any questions in regard to our review of the plat please call me.
Sincerely,
Tim Henkel
Transportation Planner
cc: Steve Keefe - Metro Council
Les Weigelt - Hennepin Co. DOT
Mike Reiter - Hennepin Co. Surveyor
City of Eden Prairie
City Offices
7600 Executive Drive • Eden Prairie. MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-2262
January 30, 1991
Ms. Pat Groeper
Assistant Manager, Retail Development
Super Valu Stores, Inc.
PO Box 1451
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Dear Pat:
At the January 28, 1991, Planning Commission meeting, the Cub Foods project was recommended for
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the replacement of 6 foot evergreens by 8, 10 and 12
foot evergreens along the south building, east of the right-in only for screening purposes.
B. Submit a comprehensive sign package for the bank, pharmacy and Cub Foods detailing
size, color, letter style and location on the building. The size of all signs shall not
exceed 325 square feet. The sign package will be approved with no further signage
allowed unless indicated on the approved plan.
C. Redesign the pylon to meet the City Code requirements of a maximum 18" in width and
a 40 square foot maximum sign base. The sign shall be designed to be architecturally
compatible with the building.
D. Provide a detailed lighting plan depicting pole type and color, fixture type and lamp
illumination color.
E. Submit material building colors and samples.
F. Provide sidewalk connections to the building.
G. Provide trash compactor screening which is compatible with building architecture.
2. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Receive permission from the church and City for grading off-site.
%egad Prow
Ms. Pat Groeper
January 30, 1991 Page Two
B. Stake the grading limits with an erosion control fence.
C. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading.
3. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the
Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
City Engineer.
4. Sign a special assessment agreement with the City for the upgrading of Leona Road. This
agreement will become null and void if all parties agree to vacate the existing right of
way.
5. Submit a petition to the City requesting an overall drainage study for the area to resolve the
storm water capacity problem.
6. Apply for and receive a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for a setback less
than 35 feet from Prairie Center Drive. Mitigation for the reduced setback will be the
construction of the enclosed loading facility, screening fence and landscaping.
7. Apply for and receive a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to allow for an
impervious surface greater than 30% within a shoreland area.
8. Provide and construct "gateway monument" sign for the City. This is a building design element
which is partial mitigation for the building setback variance.
9. Agree to the terms listed in the Outside Storage section.
Items IA - 1G are required prior to City Council review which is scheduled for February 19, 1991.
Please submit ten sets of revised plans by February 14, 1991.
Sincerely,
Um-Q--1,{\
Donald R. Uram, AICP
Planner
January 8, 1990
TO: Don Uram - Planning Dept
FROM: Jim Schlossmacher / Molly Koivumaki - Police Dept
SUBJECT: Proposed Cub Foods on W. 78th Street
Upon reviewing the plans for the proposed Cub Foods on W.
78th Street and Prairie Center Drive, we have the following
recommendation:
- To provide for an efficient flow of vehicular traffic and
to reduce the risk of serious injury or death from
automobile crashes we recommend the installation of
traffic control signals at the intersection of
Hwy 169 and W 78th Street, or Hwy 169 and Leona Road.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: January 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Entrance Monuments to Eden Prairie Major Center Area
INTRODUCTION
To promote Eden Prairie and the Major Center Area (MCA), the City has been considering
special methods of identification at entrances to this area. The purpose of these "gateway
monuments" is to draw attention to and provide an identity for Eden Prairie's "downtown".
Suggested locations include the Cub Foods site located at the intersection of West 78th Street and
Prairie Center Drive, the Tower Square project located at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive
and U. S. 169, the intersection of Highway 5 and Prairie Center Drive and at MNDOT' s facility
on U. S. 169. These sites have been suggested due to their highly visible location.
CURRENT STATUS
The "gateway monument" idea is important now because of the opportunity we have to plan for
and have constructed the first one on the east building wall of Cub Foods. This is possible due
to the provision of a large screening wall at the east end of the Cub Foods building which
provides an opportunity for its design as a "gateway" design feature. This wall, which is
designed to enclose the loading facilities is located within 20 feet of the property line and is 230
feet long and 18 feet high. A section of the wall measuring 50 feet by 18 feet has been designed
specifically as a location for a "gateway monument". Throughout the review process, Cub Foods
has supported this idea and indicate a willingness to construct the wall and "gateway monument"
subject to City approval.
DESIGN CRITERIA
Equally important to location is the design criteria for the "gateway monument" program. The
criteria should be based on a concept of consistency and transferability so that the selected
"gateway monument" can be used at other locations as suggested, and could be transferred to
such things as kiosks, banners, building signs, etc. This concept will become increasingly
important as the MCA continues to develop.
Specific design criteria such as: color, size, letter style, sign material, logo, and name are items
that need to be established. Some general guidelines are as follows:
1. Size of the monuments shall not exceed 300 square feet which is the maximum allowed
by City Code.
2. Background building material should be the same brick and architectural style as the
adjacent buildings.
3. • The same design should be used in all locations for consistency.
ALTERNATIVES
To begin the gateway design process, both Cub Foods and City staff have worked on sign
designs and names for the area. The designs, which are based primarily on the Eden Prairie logo
and letter style, will be presented at Monday night's meeting. Although at least 50 names have
been considered, "Prairie Lakes Market Center" and "Eden Prairie Market Center" are favorites
so far because of their tie in to Prairie Center Drive, which rings the area, and Eden Prairie
Center, which is the retail heart of the area (see attached list).
Because of the subjective nature of these decisions, Staff has identified three alternative processes
which could be used for the selection of the Cub entrance monument.
1. Planning Commission and City Council could select one of Staffs designs and/or have
it further refined.
2. Planning Commission and City Council could select one of Cub Foods' designs and/or
have it further refined.
3. The City could solicit proposals from professional design firms to provide a "gateway
monument" design and overall plan for all the monuments within the MCA of the City.
If the Commissions or Council have other names or design ideas, suggestions would be
appreciated.
Prairie Town Center
Prairie Town Square
Prairie Town Plaza
Prairie Retail Commons
Prairie Commercial Place
Prairie Town Place
Prairie Place
Prairie Town Location
Prairie Business Location
Prairie Business Position
Prairie Image
Prairie Lakes
Prairie Lakes Business Exchange
Prairie Central
Prairie Center
Prairie Commons
Prairie Square
Prairie Plaza
Prairie Business Exchange
Prairie Exchange
Prairie Business Realm (ha ha)
Central Business Exchange
Central Square
Prairie Central Commons
Central Dominion
Prairie Central
Prairie Mercantile Exchange
Primary Center Area
Prairie Business Corridor
Prairie Commercial Corridor
Prairie Retail Corridor
The Prairie Commercial Scene
Prairie Lakes Commercial Vista
Commercial Resource Area
Downtown Resource Area
Mainstreet Plaza
Mainstreet Commons
Prairie Market Center
Prairie Market Commons
Prairie Marketplace
Prairie Storefronts
Prairie Shopping District
Prairie Business District
Eden Prairie Business Commons
Business Resource Area
Urban
Resource
Vista
Principal
Image
Effigy
Picture
Reflection
Impression
Conception
Natural
Vision
Corridor
Entry
Vestibule
Context
Engerland
Prairie World
Eden Lakes Corridor
The Corridor
Community Commercial Corridor
Prairie Lakes Corridor
The View
Regional Town Center
Prairie Business Center
Prairie Center City
Lakeside
Constellation Center
Prairie Interstate
Inter Prairie
Interpralake
Intereden
Prairieopolis
ItrGlrAgiri&
I)14n 111171ENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
'efLi10 XeGiOW WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106
PHONENO. 772-7910
January 18, 1991
Mr. Chris Eager
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Eager:
RE: PROPOSED CUB FOODS, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY
We have reviewed the site plans (received January 4, 1991) for the
above-referenced project (NEi Section 14, T116N, R22W) and have the
following comments to offer:
1) The project site does not contain any ONR protected waters or
wetlands; therefore, no DNR protected waters permit is
required.
2) The site does not appear to be within a floodplain district.
3) If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons
per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need
to obtain a DNR appropriation permit. You are advised that it
typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit
application.
4) A portion of the site is within the shoreland district of
Anderson Lake (27-62P). The main concern we see is in relation
to the impervious surface and stormwater management. It
appears that the impervious surface greatly exceeds the city's
limit of 30% for projects within a shoreland district. How
does the city intend to address this inconsistency? If the
impervious surface is allowed to exceed the city's standards,
it will be especially important to have a good stormwater
management plan for the site. The final destination of the
stormwater is not clear in the site plan, however, we assume it
is Anderson Lake. Stormwater sedimentation/treatment basins,
or other appropriate stormwater treatment features, must be
utilized before the stormwater reaches Anderson Lake. It
appears that the area near catch basin #10 (northeast portion
of the site) may provide some possible treatment, however, our
information did not include any details. If this is the case,
the city should ensure that the capacity is adequate and
maintenance responsibilities are clear.
(te
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
STATE OF
FILENO
Chris Enger
January 18, 1991
Page Two
5) Grading is proposed in a steep slope area along the eastern
side of the site. Appropriate erosion control measures should
be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota
Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning
Handbook (Board of Water and Soil Resources and Association of
Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines,
or their equivalent, should be followed.
6) Vegetative screening should be adequate to screen the building
when viewed from the shore of Anderson Lake.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at
772-7910 should you have questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely,
Cell Strauss
Area Hydrologist
C287:kap
cc: Anderson Lake (27-62P) file
• • 1;
,
THE
RETAIL-SUPPORT
December 31, 1990
Christopher M. Enger
Director, Planning
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
SUPER VALU STORES, INC.
Alk,GADDRESS:
PDAKM1451.MINNEMOUS.MNS6140
RE: Proposed Cub Food Site Submission
Dear Chris,
Please accept this letter as a formal proposal requesting City approval for a
zoning change, site plan review and preliminary platting of the attached
legally described parcels.
Super Valu has acquired a 30 day option on this parcel to pursue the above
mentioned approvals in order to build and own a Cub Foods store. Our desire
would be, if approvals are obtained, to be under construction in the early
part of summer "91".
The property is located at the north west quadrant of West 78th Street and
Prairie Center Drive. The total property is 11.57 acres. From this total,
1.22 acres are designated to street right of way, 1.76 acreas are designated
to the outlot at the west edge of the property (We are not requesting a zoning
change on this outlot). The remaining 8.59 acres are designated for a Cub
Foods.
The Cub Foods is proposed to have 67,510 square feet main level (B.A.R. =
0.18) with future expansion at 7,349 square feet (B.A.R. = 0.20). The
following is the square footage breakdown.
Retail
Office
Prep. & Storage
- 48,636 sq. ft.
- 1,200 sq. ft.
- 17 674 sq. ft.
67,510 sq. ft.
The parking layout exceeds the ordinance requirement for the 67,510 Cub Foods,
however, is deficient by 6 spaces should the future addition be constructed.
The roof top mechanical equipment is appropriately screened as indicated on
plan sheet E-1. Exterior elevations, along with proposed building materials
and signage are also shown on plan sheet E-1. One free standing pylon sign at
80 sq. ft. is located on the site.
191411.•AS....‘
%P.JEAPOLS C,VISON 101 JEFFERSON AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 • PHONE 15121932-4300
Christopher M. Enger
12/31/90
Page 2
As suggested by and with the cooperation of the City Planning Staff, the
entire loading area will be enclosed, which will require the only variance
request with this application. Additional screen walls are integrated into
the east edge of the site to compliment the loading enclosure.
Site lighting will accomplish the security and safety requirements for this
site. Free standing 40 ft. light standards with high pressure sodium luminary
will be placed in the parking lot. Wall mount lighting will be provided
around the building. Lighting will be directed down to minimize glare. Refer
to the site plan for proposed placement.
Site grading has been completed to integrate the project with the site,
accommodating proper drainage and minimizing off site visual concerns. Slopes
existing and proposed do not exceed 3 to 1. The off site grading is proposed
mainly to accommodate utility and road construction and to provide a uniform
transition with the loading area enclosure.
The site lies in flood zone C (minimal flooding) and we are not aware of any
adverse affects on wild life or shoreline management areas.
Please refer to the enclosed plan for more detailed information.
Sheet 1 Site Plan
Sheet 2 Preliminary Plat
Sheet 3 Grading, drainage and erosion control
Sheet 4 Utility Plan
Sheet 5 Landscaping Plan
Sheet 6 Tree Survey - Topo/Boundary
Sheet 7 Illustrative sight sections
Certification of survey
Sheet R-1 Fixture Plan
Sheet E-1 Exterior elevations
We would like to reiterate our appreciation for the assistance the entire
planning staff has provided in developing the plans for this project. We will
be available to answer any questions which may arise and to provide
supplementary data if needed.
Pat Groeper
Assistant Manager
Retail Development
PAG/dt
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (7
from
Certificate of Survey
Prepared By
EGAN, FIELD, NOWAK, INC., SURVEYORS
To Turner Development Corporation, Super Valu Stores, Inc
and Chicago Title Insurance Company
SURVEY FOR: Greenberger, Krauss 2, Jacobs
DESCRIPTION: (As contained in Chicago Title Insurance Company Commitment No.c 2407427):
PARCEL I:
Those parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Flying Cloud Center lying Southeasterly of
the following described line: Beginning at a point on tne North line of said Lot 1
distant 164.47 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1: thence Southwesterly
parallel with the Westerly line of said Lots 1 and 2 to the Southerly line of said
Lot 2 and said line there terminating and all that part of the adjoining vacated
Titus Road dedicated in the plat of Flying Cloud Center which lies West of the East
line of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 335, Northerly of the North line of 78th
Street and South of the North line of said plan, all as shown on said plat,
according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar
of Titles in and for said County. (Certificate of Title No. 662976)
PARCEL 2:
Lot 4, Block 2, Leona Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate
in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 661370)
PARCEL 3:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, all in Leona Addition, according to the plat thereof on file
and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County,
Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 663027)
PARCEL 4:
The Easterly 109 feet of that part of Lot 6, "Auditor's Subdivision Number 335,
Hennepin County, Minnesota', described as beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 5,
said Auditor's Subdivision, thence North along the West line thereof a distance of
324 feet, thence East parallel to the South line of Lots 5 and 6 a distance of
672.22 feet, thence South parallel to the West line of said Lot 6 a distance of 324
feet to the South line thereof, thence West along the South line of said Lots 6 and
5 a distance of 672.22 feet to the point of beginning, according to the recorded
plat thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(Certificate of Title No. 663028)
PARCEL 5:
Lot 3, Block 2, Leona Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate
in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 661195)
PARCEL 6:
Lot 1, Block 1, Leona 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of
record in the office of the Registrar of Tiltles in and for said County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 682005)
PARCEL 7:
Lot 2, Block I, Leona 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of
record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of Hennepin,
State of Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 686336)
PARCEL 8:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Flying Cloud Center, according to the recorded plat thereof,
together with that part of Titus Road north of West 78th Street, which accrued
thereto by reason of the vacation thereof.
Dated: Nov. 21, 1990, Bruce W. Grivna, RLS No.17253 347
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 25. 1991
TIMBER LAKE DRIVE TOWNHOMES by The Pemtom Company. Request for
Zoning District Amendment within the RN-2.5 Zoning District on 2.11
acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Site
Plan Review on 2.11 acres for construction of 16 townhouse units in
4 buildings to be known as Timber Lake Drive Townhomes. Location:
Northeast corner of Timber Lake Drive and Island Road.
Tom McCarthy, representing the proponent presented plans for the
sixteen units to be developed on the four remaining lots. Extra
parking spaces would be provided for guest parking and a fire
hydrant would be added. The landscaping plan would be revised to
provide additional screening. The price range for the homes would
be between $80,000 and $90,000 with an average of 1730 square feet
of floor space.
Uram reported that this was an inf ill project. Staff had tried to
make the proposed units as consistent as possible with the existing
units. Variances would be necessary for side yard setbacks
throughout the project and a front yard setback on Parcel C. Uram
stated that residents had pointed out an existing erosion problem
on the outlot which would need to be addressed. Hennepin County
had requested and additional four feet of right-of-way for County
Road 4. Uram noted that there was still a question as to whether
the colors and architecture would fit in with the existing
neighborhood.
McCarthy stated that the architectural design was as close to the
existing homes as possible. The siding would be a maintenance free
siding.
Hallett asked when County Road 4 would be upgraded. Uram replied
possibly in 1994 or 1995.
Geri Olsen, 7964 Timber Lake Drive, stated that she lived in one of
the existing upper units. She added that she would have six
windows facing the proposed development. Olsen stated that when
she purchased her unit she had paid an extra $4,000 for the view of
the lake and was concerned with the proposal because if developed
as planned she would only be able to see approximately ten feet of
the lake. Olsen was concerned about the height of the new
buildings in relation to the existing units. Uram replied that the
units would be at the same height. Olsen asked if the building
could be brought back further from the lake and turned. McCarthy
believed that moving the building back would create driveway
problems. Uram replied that the building could be moved toward the
property line approximately five feet and the building could be
tilted to a minor degree. Uram recommended approval of the project
with the understanding that these items be addressed by the
proponent.
Hallett asked if the proponent would be open to these
recommendations.
Norman asked if the additional parking spaces could be moved. Uram
replied that Staff had recommended the extra parking spaces and
noted that moving them would be difficult due to the location of
the property line.
Olsen stated that she would like to see the additional parking
spaces removed from the plan entirely. She believed it would ruin
the landscaping. Uram stated that the parking spaces were
recommended for convenience based on observations in other similar
facilities. Olsen asked if the sidings would be compatible.
McCarthy replied that the siding proposed was vertical, while the
existing homes were horizontal. Olsen stated that she would like
to see uniformity as much as possible.
Ruebling asked if it would be possible to move the building to the
west. Uram replied yes. Ruebling then asked if the sidings would
be compatible. Uram replied that samples were required prior to
City Council review.
Mark Weber, 7966 Timber Lake Drive, stated that he was not opposed
to development on these lots; however, believed that it was
important for the units to be compatible with the existing
neighborhood. Weber asked if the footprint would be larger than
the existing units. Uram replied yes. Weber then recommended that
the units be moved as far away from the existing units as possible.
He added that it was important that the units fit in with the
neighborhood regarding color, size, and architecture. Weber stated
that he was also concerned with the impact on the view of the lake.
Norman asked if the proposed units would be part of the homeowners
association. McCarthy replied yes.
Dennis Elliott, president of the homeowners association, stated
that the association would like to see the building brought back as
far as possible to the west. He added that the association and the
developer had worked together to try to maintain the compatibility
with the existing units.
Norman asked Elliott how the association viewed the additional
parking spaces. Elliott stated that he believed the spaces to only
be temporary.
Elliott asked the price range of the units. McCarthy replied that
the units would be priced between $80,000 and $90,000. He added
that the developer would try to keep the pricing in this range for
marketing purposes.
Ruebling asked if the square footage of the proposed units would be
larger than the existing units. Weber replied that the proposed
square footage would be larger than his unit.
NOTION 1:
Hallett moved, seconded by Sandstad to close the public hear
i
n
g
.
Motion carried 5-0-1. Dodge abstained.
poTIo 2:
Hallett moved, seconded by Bye to recommend to the City Cou
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of Pemtom Company for Zoning Dist
r
i
c
t
Amendment within the RM-2.5 District on 2.11 acres with va
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, for construction
o
f
1
6
townhouse units, to be known as Timber Lake Drive Townhomes,
b
a
s
e
d
on plans dated February 8, 1991, subject to the recommendati
o
n
s
o
f
the Staff Report dated February 22, 1991, with the additions
o
f
t
h
e
following: The building on Parcel D be moved to the southw
e
s
t
a
n
d
siding samples be submitted to the homeowners association an
d
C
i
t
y
Council. Motion carried 5-0-1. Dodge abstained.
NOTION 3:
Hallett moved, seconded by Bye to recommend to the City C
o
u
n
c
i
l
approval of the request of Pemtom Company for Site Plan Rev
i
e
w
o
n
2.11 acres for construction of 16 townhouse units in
f
o
u
r
buildings, to be known as Timber Lake Drive Townhomes, ba
s
e
d
o
n
plans dated February 8, 1991, subject to the recommendations
o
f
t
h
e
Staff Report dated February 22, 1991, with the additions
o
f
t
h
e
following: The building on Parcel D be moved to the southwe
s
t
a
n
d
siding samples be submitted to the homeowners association an
d
C
i
t
y
Council. Motion carried 5-0-1. Dodge abstained.
tol
2. Site Plan Review on 2.11 acres for construction of 16 units in 4
buildings.
BACKGROUND
This site is currently guided Medium
Density Residential and was zoned RM-2.5
according to a 1984 PUD. The approved
PUD depicted a total of 44 units on this site
in 11 buildings. A total of 7 buildings (28
units) have been constructed.
Surrounding land uses in this area include
the Elim Shores senior residential project,
zoned RM-2.5 to the north and Lake Park
townhomes, zoned RM-6.5 to the south.
SITE PLAN
The site plan depicts the construction of 16
townhouse units on the remaining four
vacant lots within this project. The proposal
meets the density requirements of the
Medium Density Guide Plan designation
and the RM-2.5 Zoning District.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
Donald R. Uram, Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
February 22, 1991
Timber Lake Drive Townhomes
The Pemtom Company
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Timber Lake Drive and Island Road
REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the RM-2.5 Zoning District on
2.11 acres with variances.
AREA LOCATION MAP
Building and parking areas meet the minimum setback requirements in the RM-2.5 Zoning
District with the exception of a front yard setback to parking for Parcel C and side yard setbacks
throughout the project. Side yard setback variances are common in a townhouse project. The
proponent has applied to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for these variances.
The parking requirement for townhomes is two spaces per unit with one enclosed. A double car
garage and two exterior parking spaces are proposed for each unit. The developer is also
providing eight additional guest parking stalls.
Access to the site would be provided by existing driveways from County Road 4 and Timber
Lakes Drive. Individual site access for each of the lots will be provided from the existing
driveway within the project.
Hennepin County is requesting an additional four feet of right-of-way for the County Road 4
upgrading. Because the property is not being platted, the City cannot require the developer to
dedicate the additional land. However, when this right-of-way is acquired by the County, the
building on Parcel A will be within the front yard setback. The plans shall be revised to reflect
a 35 foot front yard setback after the County taking.
GRADING
Since this site is level, overall grading is minimal. Proposed grading will maintain the existing
berm on Timber Lakes Drive. Additional berming will also occur along County Road 4 adjacent
to Parcel A for screening purposes.
ARCHITECTURE
A single quadraplex building style is proposed. In order to help fit in with the adjacent
buildings, similar building materials and colors should be used. Building material samples and
colors shall be submitted prior to Council review.
LANDSCAPING
For a project of this size, a total of 130 caliper inches of plant material is required. The
landscape plan meets the minimum requirements.
UTILITIES
All utilities proposed within this project will be private. Sewer and water service can be
provided by connections to existing sewer and water services in the existing private driveway.
Storm water runoff will be collected within existing catchbasins and discharged into Mitchell
Lake. An erosion problem caused by the existing discharge shall be corrected with this
development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the request for Zoning District Amendment within the RM-2.5
Zoning District on 2.11 acres with variances and Site Plan Review on 2.11 acres for construction
of 16 townhouse units in four buildings based on plans dated February 8 and February 13, 1991
subject to the recommendations contained in the staff report dated February 22, 1991, and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall:
A. Revise the plans to provide a 35 foot front yard setback to the building on Parcel
A to accommodate the taking of four feet of additional right-of-way,
B. Provide samples of colors and building materials for the buildings.
C. Agree to correct the erosion control problem to Mitchell Lake from the existing
catchbasin system.
D. Submit storm water runoff, erosion control and utility plans for review by the
City Engineer and Watershed District.
2. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate cash park fee.
3. Apply for and receive variances for front and side yard setbacks from the Board of
Appeals and Adjustments.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ST PAUL DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1 ,121 US POST OFFICE A CUSTOM NOOSE
ST PAUL. MINNESOTA SS101.1479
AfftvIO
WEWONOF
Construction-Operations
Regulatory (91-1295N-12)
February 22, 1991
Planning Director
Department of City Planning
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Our office was provided with plans for several project sites within the
- City of Eden Prairie. We were asked to evaluate the projects and determine
whether Corps of Engineers permits would be required.
Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act the Corps regulates the placement
of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands.
Listed below are the various projects which we reviewed and a discussion of
whether the project would involve the placement of material into wetlands.
*Fairview Clinic - this appears to be an expansion of an existing facility
south of the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and West 78th Street. No
wetlands appear to be on this site, therefore, grading and filling for this
project would not require a permit from the Corps. (Corps file number 91-442J-
12)
* Townhomes of North Bay - construction of multi-unit housing within an
existing development east of Mitchell Lake and west of County Road 4. No permit
would be required from the Corps, because no wetlands would be filled as a result
of the project. (Corps file number 91-441J-12)
* KMSP building site - project site is bordered by Viking Drive, Prairie
Center Drive and Crossroads Retail Center. No permit would be required from
the Corps, because no wetlands would be filled as a result of the project. (Corps
file number 91-409J-12)
* Welter Purgatory Acres 6th - a 7 lot housing development south of
Sunnybrook Road. A wetland complex is located along the east side of this
development. It appears that some wetland filling/grading could be required for
this project. Within the Corps regulations is a provision, referred to as a
nationwide permit, which authorizes minor wetland fill projects. This nationwide
permit authorizes wetland fills up to 10,000 square feet in some areas and up
to 1 acre in others. In this particular project area the nationwide permit
allows the filling of 10,000 square feet of wetland. It appears the amount of
wetland encroachment at this site would be minor enough to fit within the scope
of this nationwide permit limit. Potential lot buyers should be informed that
- Corps permits could be required if they plan to increase the size of their yards
by grading or filling into the wetland. (Corps file number 91-1173N-12)
* Walt Carpenter site - proposed fill area north of Valley View Road at
101,47
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 HENNENN PHONE
FAX
TDD
(612) 930-2500
(612) 930-2513
(612) 930-2696
February 6, 1991
Chris Enger
Planning Director
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Mr. Enger:
RE: Proposed Plat - Townhomes of North Bay
CSAH 4, northwest quadrant of CSAH 4 and Timber Lake Drive
Section 17, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 1905
Review and Recommendations
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03. Plats and Surveys, require County review of
proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and have the
following comments:
- The proposed plat is within the project limits of Hennepin County Project No.
9016. This project is currently in preliminary design. The developer should
contact either Bruce Polaczyk, P.E., at 930-2523 or Steve Theis, P.E., at
930-2528 for project coordination.
- Based on current alignment data and road design requirements, Hennepin Coun
t
y
needs approximately 4 feet of additional right of way, along the plat's frontage
with CSAH 4, to accommodate the proposed road improvement (see attachment). Th
e
developer should dedicate the needed additional right of way.
- As shown on the proposed plat, all new development must use the existing access.
No new access from the plat to CSAH 4 will be permitted.
- The developer should provide access for Outlot E, Timber Lakes, via either or
both the existing private road for The Townhomes of North Bay or the existing
city street, Timber Lake Drive. This action precludes the need for future
additional access to CSAH 4.
- All proposed construction within County right of way requires eithe an appro
v
e
d
utility permit or entrance permit prior to beginning construction. The utili
t
y
permit includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail
development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Office, 930-2549, for utility
permit forms.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
rn on equalopportunityemployer
/
Chris Enger
February 6, 1991
Page 2
- The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed
during plat construction.
Please direct any response or questions to Doug Mattson at 930-2675.
Sincerely,
Dennis L. Hansen, P.E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
DLH/DBM:gk
Attachment
&le
Cnnesota Department of Transport?(
Metropolitan District
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
January 31, 1991 Reply to
Telephone No 593 -8753
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
7000 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer to: TH 5 & CSAH 4
The Pemtom Company
Townhomes of North Bay
Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further
development and have no comments.
This property does not abut the existing or proposed trunk highway system or county
highway and does not require state comment unless it meets requirements of the pamphlet
"Mn Environmental Ouality Board Environmental Review Program 4410.0200 to 4410,7800.
If you have any questions in regard to our review of the plat please call me.
Sincerely,
Timothy A. Henkel
Transportation Planner
cc: Steve Keefe - Metropolitan Council
Les Weigelt - Hennepin County DOT
Mike Reiter - Hennepin County Surveyor
Ceielitat
1990
ID1
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION # 91-58
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FAIRVIEW MEDICAL HEALTH CLINIC OF
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT
TO THE OVERALL DATASERV PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie development is
considered a proper amendment to the overall DataServ Planned Unit Development Concept;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request
of Fairview Healthcare Services for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall DataServ
Planned Unit Development Concept for the Fairview medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie
development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on March 19, 1991;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie development PUD Concept
Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as
outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the
overall DataServ Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application
materials for Fairview Health Care Clinic of Eden Prairie.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated February 25, 1991.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 19th day of March, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Fran, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-66
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and
comment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal of Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services for development
of 7.3 acres for a health clinic use requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 7.3 acres located east of
Prairie Center Drive and south of Technology Drive be amended from Industrial to Office.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 19th day of March, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 25, 1991
FAIRVIEW MEDICAL HEALTH CLINIC OF EDEN PRAIRIE by Fairview
Hospital and Healthcare Services. Request for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from Industrial to Office on 7.3 Acres; Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on 17.4 acres; Zoning District Change
from Rural and 1-2 to Office on 2.9 acres; Site Plan Review on 2.9
acres for construction of a 15,200 square foot medical health care
clinic to be known as Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden
Prairie. Location: East of Prairie Center Drive and south of
Technology Drive.
Ray Piirainen, representing the proponent, stated that four other
sites currently existed throughout the twin cities. He added that
the proponent would like to begin to construction in April to be
ready for operation in the fall.
Franzen reported that Staff recommended approval of the project
based on the recommendations outlined in the Staff Report dated
February 22, 1991.
Piiarainen asked Franzen to clarify the statement regarding
expansion to the east and if expansion was limited to this
direction. Franzen replied that expansion could go in any
direction.
Bernard Herman, representing the proponent, presented the plans for
the project. He noted that the site was triangular and the
building had been positioned such that expansion could be possible
to the front or to either side. The building was designed so that
in the future a second building could be constructed. The parking
lot had been developed to provide the largest number of parking
spaces located close to the building to allow for easy access to
the facility. A vehicle drop off area was also provided at the
entrance. The trash enclosure would be constructed of the same
material as the exterior of the building. The driveway currently
would be shared with Dataserv. In 1992-1993 the interchange was
expected to change and the location of the driveway would be
changed to access from Prairie Center Drive. Catch basins would be
located at the north end of the lot and three in the parking lot
area. Landscaping would be extensive. The existing trees would be
left and addition trees of varying sizes and varieties would be
added. Three double pole lights would be located along the
driveway. The lighting would be downcast. The floor plan would
allow all the tenant spaces to be expanded if needed.
Dodge asked if the facility would be managed under one
organization. Piiarainen replied that this would be a medical
office building with individual tenants.
Herman stated that the exterior brick would be the same as
Dataserv. The exterior lighting and landscaping would also match
that of Dataserv. A vaulted roof with a skylight would accent the
entrance to the facility. Herman noted that smaller windows were
required in a medical clinic to allow for privacy in the exam
rooms. The exam rooms were located along the outer perimeter of
the building. The window treatment needs to be special to reduce
drafts and heat loss. Larger windows would be located in the
waiting rooms; however, these could not be exactly located at this
time. Herman noted that reveals which helped to breakup the mass
of the building.
Jim Hawkins, 7289 Green Ridge Drive, stated that he was both a
resident and an employee of Dataserv. Hawkins noted that he had
not been given details of the plan until this meeting. Hawkins
asked if a berm was planned. Herman replied that the property
would be flatten, molded and shaped. Hawkins asked how the
landscaping would be supported for preservation. Herman replied
that possibly an irrigation system would be installed. Piiarainen
replied that an irrigation system was not planned for at this time.
Hawkins believed that there would be a disruption in the water flow
pattern which should be addressed. Hawkins asked if the drainage
field and tile would be adequate to handle the watershed. Franzen
replied that three catch basins would be located on the property
which would flow into two storm sewer lines adjacent to the site.
Hawkins asked for more detail on the metal screening for the
mechanic units. Herman replied that the mechanical units would be
located directly behind the skylights. Hawkins stated that the
Dataserv building was a two-story facility and questioned what
Dataserv employees would see from the second story. Herman replied
that the site lines had not been checked. Herman added that the
building was at an 846 elevation and was approximately 8-to-9 feet
above street level.
Hawkins expressed concern about the compatibility of the building
with existing facilities. He noted that the exterior of the
building was said to reflect that of Dataserv, but would not match.
Hawkins added that Dataserv would like to have the opportunity to
review the landscaping plan further. He strongly recommended that
an irrigation system be installed to preserve the green space along
Prairie Center Drive.
Hallett believed that the point regarding irrigation was well
taken. Hallett stated that berming without irrigation had caused
difficulties in the past. Piirainen replied that an irrigation
system was not planned at this time due to the uncertainty of what
would actually happen regarding the upgrading of Prairie Center
Drive and Technology Drive. Piirainen added that an irrigation
system would be looked at within the first two years after
development.
Hallett stated that other facilities in Eden Prairie did look down
op?:,
on other buildings. Hallett noted that Rosemount Engineering looks
down on Dataserv. Piirainen reemphasized that the mechanical units
would be hidden behind the skylight. Herman added that the
mechanical units would be less than four feet high and are
consolidated in a small space.
Dodge asked why a two-story building was not being planned for now
if plans were already in the making for expansion. Herman replied
that economically it was better to construct a one-story building
at this time.
Dodge asked if there would be a charge for parking. Piirainen
replied no. Dodge then asked if the City could prevent a charge
for parking in the future.
Hawkins stated that Dataserv would be very concerned if there would
be a charge for parking due to the cross easement with Dataserv.
Sandstad noted that both property owners had to agree to cross
easements.
Dodge asked if a sample of the proposed brick color was available.
Franzen replied that the brick color would be the same as Dataserv;
however, the manufacturer might not be the same.
MOTION 1:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 6-0.
MOTION 2:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Fairview Medical Hospital and Healthcare
Services for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial
to Office on 7.3 acres for construction of a medical clinic, based
on plans dated February 19, 1991, subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated February 22, 1991, with the addition that
prior to City Council review samples of exterior building materials
be submitted for approval. The Planning Commission also strongly
recommended that an irrigation system be installed in the berm
area. Motion carried 5-0-1. Norman abstained.
MOTION 3:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Fairview Medical Hospital and Healthcare
Services for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment to the
overall DataServ Planned Unit Development Concept, on 17.4 acres
for construction of a medical clinic, based on plans dated February
19, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
February 22, 1991, with the addition that prior to City Council
review samples of exterior building materials be submitted for
approval. The Planning Commission also strongly recommended that
an irrigation system be installed in the berm area. Motion carried
5-0-1. Norman abstained.
NOTION 4:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Fairview Medical Hospital and Healthcare
Services for Zoning District Change from Rural and 1-2 to Office on
2.9 acres for construction of a medical clinic, based on plans
dated February 19, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the
Staff Report dated February 22 1991, with the addition that prior
to City Council review samples of exterior building materials be
submitted for approval. The Planning Commission also strongly
recommended that an irrigation system be installed in the berm
area. Motion carried 5-0-1. Norman abstained.
MOTION 5:
Bye moved, seconded by Sandstad to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Fairview Medical Hospital and Healthcare
Services for Site Plan Review on 2.9 acres for construction of a
medical clinic, based on plans dated February 19, 1991, subject to
the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 22, 1991,
with the addition that prior to City Council review samples of
exterior building materials be submitted for approval. The
Planning Commission also strongly recommended that an irrigation
system be installed in the berm area. Motion carried 5-0-1.
Norman abstained.
Hawkins complimented Staff on a thorough review.
AREA LOCATION MAP
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
February 22, 1991
Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie
Fairview Healthcare Services
Opus Corporation
East of Prairie Center Drive and South of Technology Drive
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Industrial to Office
on 7.3 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 17.4 acres.
3. Zoning District Change from Rural and 1-2 Park to Office on 2.9
acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 2.9 acres.
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
BACKGROUND
This site is part of the DataServ Planned
Unit Development. Phase One of DataServ
exists on the lot to the north totaling
152,000 square feet. Phase Two of the
DataServ project would be an additional
152,000 square feet on the south lot.
The DataServ PUD was amended in 1988 to
allow a parking lot expansion on the
Fairview South site. Only the parking lot
was zoned 1-2 Park to accommodate an
internal change within the DataServ building
which converted warehouse space to office
space.
1
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE
A Comprehensive Guide Plan change is requested from Industrial to Office. The Guide Plan
change to Office would be appropriate in the Major Center Area which is a mixture of retail and
office uses. The DataServ building is mostly office with some warehousing. When the DataServ
building was approved in 1985, a requirement was to design the industrial building with an
office-like appearance.
SITE PLAN
The site plan depicts the construction of a one-story, 15,200 square foot medical office facility
on approximately three acres. The building, as proposed, meets the minimum requirements of
the Office Zoning District including base area ratio, floor area ratio, building setbacks and
parking setbacks. A building expansion of approximately 2,000 feet is also shown on the eastern
part of the building.
At some point in the future, Fairview South will subdivide the property in two for a second
building of approximately 15,000 square feet. This piece of property is proposed for Office
guiding and a PUD amendment. Rezoning is not requested since specific site plans are not
available.
ACCESS
Access to this property will be a shared access off Prairie Center Drive. There will be a new
median cut to allow for left turns into the site. This temporary median cut is acceptable to the
City. When Technology Drive is realigned in the future by the State Highway Department, this
temporary median access will become the full access to the property.
When Phase Two is developed in the future, Fairview will be requesting a median cut in Prairie
Center Drive to provide full access to the second parcel. Whether the second access will be
allowed and where it will be located will be based upon a traffic study which analyzes turning
movement conflicts and capacities of the roadway and intersections.
ARCIIITECTURE
The Fairview South building will be utilizing the same brick and color as the DataServ building.
The building will be one story in height with mechanical equipment screened by a metal panel
of a color to match the building.
GRADING
The site has been previously graded at the time of the DataServ parking lot expansion. Minor
grading will be necessary in order to accommodate the site plan as proposed.
2
During Phase Two, there will be encroachment into the wooded slope along the south property
line. Information on the trees indicate there are a significant number of trees of 12" or greater
in diameter. Tree replacement will be necessary concurrent with Phase Two construction.
LANDSCAPING
The landscape plan meets City Code requirements for caliper inches and screening of parking
areas.
UTILITIES
City sewer and water are available adjacent to the site. Two storm sewer lines are adjacent to
the site, and both of them should be utilized for storm water runoff.
SIDEWALKS
There is an existing trail along Prairie Center Drive. There should be a 5' wide concrete
sidewalk connection between the proposed medical clinic and the trail on Prairie Center Drive.
LIGHTING
The lighting standards proposed for the office building are identical to the lighting standards on
the DataServ site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan change, PUD Amendment,
Zoning District Change and Site Plan Review for the Fairview South Medical Building based on
plans dated February 19, 1991 and the staff report dated February 22, 1991, and subject to the
following conditions:
Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall:
I. Submit cross access easements between DataServ and the Fairview South Medical
Building.
2. Provide samples of exterior materials for review.
3. Provide the final landscape plan for review.
4. Provide the final lighting plan for review.
5. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshall.
,
Mpt4Yo
AT4ENT42404
Construction-Operations
Regulatory (91-1295N-12)
Planning Director
Department of City Planning
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Our office was provided with plans for several project sites within the
- City of Eden Prairie. We were asked to evaluate the projects and determine
whether Corps of Engineers permits would be required.
Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act the Corps regulates the placement
of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands.
Listed below are the various projects which we reviewed and a discussion of
whether the project would involve the placement of material into wetlands.
* Fairview Clinic - this appears to be an expansion of an existing facility
south of the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and West 78th Street. No
wetlands appear to be on this site, therefore, grading and filling for this
project would not require a permit from the Corps. (Corps file number 91-4423-
12)
* Townhomes of North Bay - construction of multi-unit housing within an
existing development east of Mitchell Lake and west of County Road 4. No permit
would be required from the Corps, because no wetlands would be filled as a result
of the project. (Corps file number 91-441J-12)
* KMSP building site - project site is bordered by Viking Drive, Prairie
Center Drive and Crossroads Retail Center. No permit would be required from
the Corps, because no wetlands would be filled as a result of the project. (Corps
file number 91-409J-12)
* Welter Purgatory Acres 6th - a 7 lot housing development south of
Sunnybrook Road. A wetland complex is located along the east side of this
development. It appears that some wetland filling/grading could be required for
this project. Within the Corps regulations is a provision, referred to as a
nationwide permit, which authorizes minor wetland fill projects. This nationwide
permit authorizes wetland fills up to 10,000 square feet in some areas and up
to 1 acre in others. In this particular project area the nationwide permit
allows the filling of 10,000 square feet of wetland. It appears the amount of
wetland encroachment at this site would be minor enough to fit within the scope
of this nationwide permit limit. Potential lot buyers should be informed that
Corps permits could be required if they plan to increase the size of their yards
by grading or filling into the wetland. (Corps file number 91-1173N-12)
* Walt Carpenter site - proposed fill area north of Valley View Road at
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ST PAUL DISTRICT CORPS of ENGINEERS
1421 US POST OFFICE II CUSTOM HOUSE
ST PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101.7479
February 22, 1991
1.1.;,"1
PHONE NO.
Itr STATE OF
H'i 6.:g D2 ZOIrg,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
METRO WATERS, 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN 55106
772-7910 FILE NO
February 22, 1990
Scott Kip
City of Eden Prairie
Planning Department
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: EDEN PRAIRIE FAIRVIEW CLINIC, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Mr. Kip:
We have reviewed the site plans (received 1/30/91) for the above
referenced project (NE1/4 Section 15, NW1/4 Section 14, T.116N,
R.22W.) and offer the following comments:
1. The project site does not contain any DNR protected waters or
wetlands: therefore, no DNR protected waters permit is
required.
2. The site does not appear to be within a shoreland or
floodplain district. Therefore, the project does not meet the
DNR definition of a Planned Unit Development for shoreland
development.
3. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000
gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor
will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are
advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to
process the permit application.
4. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during
the construction period. The Minnesota Construction Site
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water
& Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and
Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent,
should be followed.
5. It appears that the stormwater is being routed directly to the
city stormsewers. Stormwater treatment/sedimentation basins,
or other appropriate stormwater treatment features, should be
included in the plan. If untreated stormwater reaches a lake
or wetland it can cause sedimentation and water level bounces
that are detrimental to the basin's wildlife values and water
quality.
AN EONAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Mr. Scott Kip
February 22, 1991
Page 2
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at
772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely,
e ,r frt _
iJoe Richter
Hydrologist
cc: City of Eden Prairie General File
Purgatory-Riley-Bluff Creek WHO
1
'3/
City of Eden Prairie
City Offices
A) Executive Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-2262
February 4, 1991
Mr. Robert Worthington, Executive Director
Governmental Affairs
Opus Corporation
800 Opus Center
9900 Bren Road E.
Minnetonka, MN 55343
RE: FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE SERVICES (EDEN PRAIRIE
FAIRVIEW CLINIC)
Dear Mr. Worthington:
The Staff Development Review Committee met at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 31, 1991,
to discuss the Fairview Hospital and Health Care Services site plan. Following are comments
regarding site plan changes or additional information.
1. ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY
Since this site is part of the DataServ Planned Unit Development, there should be
architectural compatibility in terms of materials, colors and design. Using only the same
brick is not a strong statement of compatibility. The building architecture should be
changed to use the same type of windows as the DataServ building.
2. ACCESS
Since detailed plans for development of the property to the south are not available at this
time, any reference to a future connection to Prairie Center Drive and median cut should
be removed from the plans. A second access/median cut in Prairie Center Drive should
be based upon a traffic study.
3. CROSS ACCESS
Cross access easements are needed for the shared entry with Prairie Center Drive. This
cross access casement should be provided to the Engineering Department for review prior
to building permit issuance.
—
fr.cycMa Pa Or
Sincerely,
Mr. Bob Worthington
February 4, 1991
Page Two
4. SIORM DRAINAGE
Storm sewer computations and drainage area maps should be provided. The storm sewer
should be designed to accommodate a 10 year event. Both existing storm sewer lines
available at this site should be used for storm drainage.
Please provide the requested information and plan changes and submit nineteen sets of plans.
These plans are required for review by the Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission. If you are unable to make plan changes by February 12, the
next available Planning Commission meeting would be March 11, 1991. .
(ad ec 7/4-
Michael D. Franzen
Senior Planner
MDF:ctk
OPUS CORPOR/i.iuN
DESIGNERS • COW FACTORS • DEVELOPERS
800 Does Center
9900 (ken Road East
Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343
1610 9364444
January 25, 1991
Mailing Address
PO Box 150
Minneapolis. Minnesota SSW
Pak (RIO 936 4529
Mr. Chris Enger
Planning Director
Department of City Planning
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Fairview Medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie
Dear Chris:
Opus Corporation is pleased to submit the enclosed plans for a 15,200 square
foot medical health care clinic which will be owned and operated by the
Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services of Minneapolis. The proposed
facility will be located on the undeveloped 7.3 acre parcel (Lot 2, Block 1,
Dataserv Business Center) which was being held in reserve for the future
expansion of the Dataserv Inc.. corporate headquarters building at 12125
Technology Drive. Changing market and business conditions over the past few
years have made that expansion unfeasible. Therefore, the proposed Fairview
medical clinic facility is being offered as an attractive alternative to the
plans originally proposed by Dataserv for the subject property.
The original plans submitted by Dataserv in 1985 proposed construction of a
100,000+ square foot office/warehouse headquarters building with capacity to
he expanded to 200,000 square feet at some future time. The existing
headquarters phase of the original plan was completed in 1986. Then in 1987
Dataserv obtained approval for the installation of a 104 space parking lot
on a portion of the subject parcel to relieve an on—site parking shortage
being experienced by its business operation at that time. Since then,
Dataserv has experienced a contraction in its business and therefore, does
not intend to pursue any further expansion of its existing headquarters
building. Therefore, the Opus Corporation is requesting that the original
POD concept plan be amended to accommodate the Fairview clinic proposal as
illustrated and described in this letter of transmittal and enclosed plans.
The proposed medical clinic will be a one story structure. The building
exterior will consist of a brick veneer and ''punched" windows of tinted
glass set in green aluminum framing. A canopy, composed of the same brick,
extends from the main entrance out to the parking lot. Over the main lobby
and set a few feet higher than the roof line will be a 20 x 70 ft. skylight
consisting of white translucent panels set in green aluminum framing. Low,
brick veneered screen walls will be located on the roof to effectively
screen mechanical equipment. The brick will be of a color and character
compatible with the existing Dataserv headquarters building.
Affiliated Companies Opus S Comolohon.Oons Architects and Engineers. Inc. Opus North Corporabon.Opus South Carporahon.0ous Southwest Corporation,
Nnrmandaie Properties Inc. Opus Properties Inc Chicago • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Tampa • Pensacola • Phoenix- San Diego • Seattle
Mr. Chris Enger
January 25, 1991
Page -2-
It is anticipated that additional space would be constructed on this site in
the future to house any expansion needs of the clinic or its related
services. The expansion could be in the form of as much as 5,000 square
feet of addition attached to the initial building or the construction of a
second free-standing facility of 10,000-20,000 square feet, as shown in
concept by the enclosed site plan.
Seventy-six (76) on site parking stalls have been provided for the facility
in compliance with city zoning standards. The property is requested to be
rezoned from its current classification to office PUD. All setback coverage
and parking standards have been designed to comply with the standards of the
proposed office zoning district. Also, the business I.D. signage proposed
for the facility have been designed to comply with the proposed office PUD
zoning standards.
Initially, the existing drive to the Dataserv site off of Prairie Center
Drive will be used to provide joint access to the Fairview site. When MNDot
constructs the improvements prgrammed for Prairie Center Drive at its
interchange with TH-5 in 1992-93, this drive would be closed and a shared
entry drive (shown on the site plan as future site entrance) would be
provided as part of a signalized intersection. In conjunction with any
expansion of the proposed clinic facility, an additional curb cut with
median would be provided at the "south" end of the property in the manner as
shown on the site plan proposal.
This clinic facility will have several medical groups and services which
work in connection with the Fairview Hospital system. The clinic groups
anticipated to locate in this building include Family Practice, Institute
for Athletic Medicine, Orthopedic Surgeons, Ltd. and Behavioral Health
Services.
The landscape plan is compatible with the type, size and theme of materials
existing on the Dataserv headquarters site. Because of the grading,
drainage and utility work that must be done on the site to accommodate the
clinic's building footprint and parking lot arrangement, some existing trees
on the south side of the site will have to be removed. However, every
effort has been made to preserve the majority of existing trees to ensure
their continuation as a prominent site feature both now and in the future.
Finally, all of the parking lot lighting standards will be of a height and
character compatible with the Dataserv headquarters arrangement.
In summary. Opus Corporation and the Fairview Hospital and Healthcare
Services Group requests approval of an amendment to the existing PUD concept
plan for the Dataserv development; a rezoning to office PUD, and site plan
approval for a new medical and health care clinic to be located on the 7.3
undeveloped portion of the Dataserv headquarters property. We would
appreciate having the enclosed plans and application material placed on the
Mr. Chris Enger
January 25, 1991
Page -3-
February 25 Agenda of the Planning Commission for consideration. If the
commission approves the requests contained in our plans and application at
that meeting, then we'd enjoy having the Council consider ratification of
the Commission's recommendations at their March 19 and again April 16
meetings which would place us in a position to break ground for the clinic
facility by the end of April of this year.
Thank you for your cooperation. Please call if you have questions or need
for any additional information.
Best regards,
Alft.tatU lita
Robert A. Worthingtatf, AICP
Executive Director
Governmental Affairs
RAW/k!
Enclosures
cc: Ray Piirainen, Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services
Mike Franzen, Senior Planner
Evan Green, MNDot West District Office
Michele Foster, Opus Corporation
Craig Larson, Opus Corporation
§ OPUS CORPORAC,A
DESIGNERS• CONTRACTORS • DEVELOPERS
800 Opus Center
9900 Bren Road East
Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343
16121 936-4444
Mailing Address
PD Bak 150
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440
fax 16121 936-4529
January 25, 1991
Mr. Evan Green, Project Manager
Minnesota Department of Transportation
West Metro District Office
2055 North Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, MN 55422
RE: Fairview Medical Clinic of Eden Prairie
Dear Mr. Green:
Please find enclosed copies of our Letter of transmittal and plans for th
e
Fairview medical clinic facility that were submitted to the City of Ed
e
n
Prairie earlier today.
Your comments would be most appreciated. We have requested that our
application for PUD rezoning and site plan approval be placed on th
e
February 25 agenda of the Eden Prairie Planning Commission f
o
r
consideration. Therefore, any comments or concerns you have regardi
n
g
proposals contained in the enclosed plans should be directed to me, Chr
i
s
Enger or Mike Franzen at the Eden Prairie Planning Department prior
t
o
that time.
Call me at 936-4419 if you require any assistance or have question
s
.
Thanks.
Sincerely yours,
Robert A. Worthington, AICP
Executive Director
Governmental Affairs
RAW/kf
Ends.
cc: Chris Enger, Eden Prairie Planning Director
Mike Franzen, Eden Prairie Senior Planner
r
Attilialed Companies Opus US. Corporation. Opus Architects and Engineers. inc.. Opus North Corporation. Opu
s
South Corporation. Opus Seesaw iZ0114107:.
NOrMandale Properties 1n0. Opus Properties inc. Chicago • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Tampa • Pensacola • Phown • 5an :Aego • Sastse
MARCH 19,1991
13407 DANA GIBBS
13408 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
13409 THE BREHM GROUP
.3410 JEFFREY JOHNSON
13411 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE
13412 DOUGLAS TENPAS
13413 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
13414 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION
13415 MINNEGASCO
13416 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG
13417 MN CHAPTER OFIAAI
13418 NORTH STAR CHAPTER OF I C B 0
13419 TRANSP TECH TRANSFER 0TH
13420 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
13421 MN LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM
13422 MTI DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
13423 AMERICAN RED CROSS
13424 MN TRUCKING ASSN
13425 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
13426 BIRTCHER WELSH
13427 DELEGARD TOOL CO
13428 FEIST BLANCHARD CO
3429 JASON-NORTHCO PROP LP01
3430 J L SHIELY COMPANY
13431 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC
13432 SEELAND ANDERS
13433 ELLEN CAMP
13434 SANDRA CHMILLEND
13435 MARY COLEMAN
13436 CHARLENE GDEMAN
13437 FRIEDA KRISTOFFERSON
13438 FLORENCE MCMAHON
13439 CYNTHIA °BRIEN
13440 BETTY PEDERSON
13441 GALE REINA
13442 LAURIE ROBERTSON
13443 MARG RODRIGUES
13444 HEAVENLY HAM
13445 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
13446 U S POSTMASTER
13447 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
13448 EAGLE WINE CO
13449 GRIGGS COOPER & CO
13450 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
13451 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
3452 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
11413769
SERVICE-PACKET DELIVERY
JANUARY & FEBRUARY 91 FUEL TAX
-1991 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM-CITY
COUNCIL/COMMISSION & BOARD MEMBERS
SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEPT
REFUND-UTILITY BILLING
ADVANCE AGAINST CONFERENCE EXPENSES
POSTAGE-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER
SERVICE
SERVICE
FEBRUARY 91 UNION DUES
CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT
CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT
CONFERENCE-STREET MAINTENANCE
CONFERENCE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-CONFERENCE-PARK & RECREATION DEFT/
PLANNING DEFT
CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE
CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER
CONFERENCE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
COPY PAPER-CITY HALL
MARCH 91 RENT-CITY HALL
-CONNECTORS/WRENCHES/AIR FITTINGS/METAL
CREEPER-STREET MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT
-STRAPS/CALIPERS/BEARINGS/OIL SEALS/HOSES/
-MOUNTING BRACKETS/HARDWARE/BELTS/ROTOR/
-BRAKE DISC PADS/CABLE TIES/LAMPS/BRAKE
SHOE/WHEEL CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MARCH 91 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
GRAVEL-SEWER DEPT
MARCH 91 RENT-LIQUOR STORE
REFUND-FIREARMS SAFETY CLASS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
-REFUND-MEMORY IMPROVEMENT CLASS-SENIOR
CITIZENS PROGRAM
-REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS-SENIOR
CITIZENS PROGRAM
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
-REFUND-LIVING TRUSTS CLASS-SENIOR
CITIZENS PROGRAM
REFUND-CROSS COUNTRY SKI LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-TAI CHI CHIH CLASS
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
SERVICE
POSTAGE-VALUATION NOTICES-ASSESSING DEPT
SERVICE
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
81.00
858.60
930.75
295.40
131.00
250.00
1808.16
93.67
13470.56
1105.00
115.00
330.00
60.00
60.00
70.00
270.00
250.00
90.00
461.78
19672.12
124.51
576.29
3787.15
130.04
4882.01
5.00
20.00
20.00
17.00
12.59
15.00
4.00
2.61
2.00
4.00
17.00
1.00
30.00
16287.05
4052.46
29724.39
876.21
1630.31
5334.14
239.45
5940.44
MARCH 19.1991
13453 PRIOR WINE CO
13454 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO
1455 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
456 STEVEN BARTZ
13457 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
13458 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
13459 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC
13460 ORION RESEARCH INC
13461 VISION ENERGY
13462 MAWP
13463 RADISSON ARROWWOOD
13464 MILE
13465 HILTON - BATON ROUGE
13466 RADISSON ARROWWOOD
13467 USPCA NATL TRAINING SEMINAR
13468 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN
13469 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF MN
13470 AT&T
13471 PETTY CASH
13472 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
'1 473 AT&T
,474 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS
13475 SYLVIA JENNESS
13476 FLORENCE LOWE
13477 SIMON & SCHUSTER
13478 HOLIDAY INN - DULUTH
13479 CROWN STERLING SUITES
13480 FUN CHARACTERS INC
13481 MIAMA
13482 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC
13483 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP
13484 BEER WHOLESALERS INC
13485 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
13486 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO
13487 HOME JUICE PRODUCTS
13488 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO
13489 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
13490 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
13491 PEPSI COLA COMPANY
13492 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
13493 TRAVEL PROFESSIONALS
13494 JOHN E REID &
13495 TARGET CENTER
496 TARGET CENTER
8328293
WINE 1828.66
LIQUOR 3441.24
POSTAGE-SPRING BROCHURES-COMMUNITY CENTER 3976.00
BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 120.00
-EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR 322.80
PROGRAMS/ADULT PROGRAMS
-HOSES/FITTINGS/BELTS/INERMOSTATS/SEALS/ 4033.45
-BRAKE FLUID/MASTER CYLINDER/COUPLERS/
-VALVES/BULBS/FUSE HOLDERS/MUFFLERStrAIL
-PIPES/BRAKE CABLES/SPLASH GUARDS/TUBING/
-CLAMPS/WHEEL WEIGHTS/SPRINGS/ANTI-FREEZE/
-SIGNALS/TIE RODS/SEAT COVER/GASKETS/WIRE/
-SWITCHES/BRAKE SHOES/CALIPERS-WATER DEPT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
JANUARY 91 SERVICE 82.50
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 108.23
GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 462.83
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 95.00
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 95.40
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 165.00
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 479.52
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 143.10
REGISTRATION FEE-CANINE TRIALS-POLICE DEPT 75.00
CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER 80.00
SCHOOL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 135.00
SERVICE 217.44
EXPENSES-CITY HALL 59.59
SERVICE 116.80
SERVICE 382.30
SERVICE 2016.27
-REFUND-WHERE ARE YOUR PHOTOS-SENIOR 5.00
CITIZENS PROGRAM
-REFUND-WHERE ARE YOUR PHOTOS-SENIOR 5.00
CITIZENS PROGRAM
CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 30.31
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEFT 107.52
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 10.00
SERVICE-CLOWN-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 75.00
CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER 12.00
LIABILITY INSURANCE 196.20
MIX 214.91
BEER 4522.60
BEER 6900.80
BEER 13405.05
MIX 31.70
BEER 230.00
BEER 13744.52
MIX 482.32
MIX 318.47
BEER 23290.45
CONFERENCE-POLICE DENT 380.00
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEM. 495.00
-TICKETS-DISNEY ON ICE-SPECIAL TRIPS & 375.00
EVENTS PROGRAM
-BUS SERVICE-DISNEY ON ICE-SPECIAL TRIPS 15.00
& EVENTS PROGRAM
(0')-1
13497 TARGET CENTER
13498 TARGET CENTER
'1 499 STRTKE MASTEEN INC
300 VOID OUT CHECK
13501 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
13502 A & G DRAFTING SERVICE
13503 ABBOTT PAINT & CARPET CO
-TICKETS-DISNEY ON ICE-SPECIAL TRIPS &
EVENTS PROGRAM
-BUS SERVICE-DISNEY ON TCE-SPECIAL TRIPS
& EVENTS PROGRAM
AUGER & BLADES-PARK MAINTENANCE
SANDER RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER
PRINTS-WATER DEPT
-PAINT BRUSHES/PAINT TRAYS/COVERS-WATER
DEPT
375.00
15.00
35.95
0.00
20.40
123.60
88.56
13504 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VET SERV PA KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL DE
F
T
13505 AIRLIFT DOORS INC DOOR REPAIRS-FIRE STATIONS/POLICE BUILDING
13506 AIRSIGNAL INC -MARCH 91 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEFT/FIRE
-DEPT/BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT/COMMUNITY
CENTER
13507 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT
13508 ALLIANCE DUES-ENGINEERING DEPT
13509 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO TV MOUNTING BRACKET-CITY HALL
13510 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO -UNIFORMS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT/STREET
-DEPT/FACILITIES DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/PARK
-MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER/UTILITIES DIVISION/
MATS-LIQUOR STORE
13511 AM STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO STEEL TUBING & PLATE-EQUIPMENT
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
13512 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC STREET SIGNS/REFLECTIVE POSTS-STREET DEPT
13513 DON ANDERSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
13514 ANDERSONS GARDEN EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER
13515 ANDON INC FELIUM TANK RENTAL-SOCIAL EVENTS PROGRAM
13516 ANDRUS AGENCY INC SERVICE-CITY HALL SITE SELECTION
13517 ARMOR SECURITY INC LOCK REPAIRS-FIRE STATION/POLICE BUILDING
13518 ASTLEFORD INTL INC MOTOR/HOSE/RUBBER STRAPS-EQUIPMENT MAINT
519 AUTO CENTRAL SUPPLY CALIPERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
J520 B & S TOOLS -DRILL BITS/SOCKETS/STRIPPERS/PLIERS-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
13521 BACONS ELECTRIC CO -INSTALLED LIFT STATION RELAYS/3 CIRCUITS
-& RECEPTACLES INSTALLED/EMERGENCY LIGHT
-REPAIR/2 RECEPTACLES REPLACED/FUSE BLOCKS
-INSTALLED FOR WELL RELAYS-UTILITIES
DIVISION
13522 BARCO BEARING CO ADHESIVE/HAND CLEANER-WATER DEPT
13523 BARRY & SEWALL INDUST SUPPLY CO RUST PROTECTION-WATER DEFT
13524 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC SIGNAL LIGHT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
13525 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC ACRYLIC SHEET-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER
13526 MATTHEW BENDER BOOK-FINANCE DEPT
13527 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-DELL RD TRAFFIC STUDY
13528 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP REPROGRAM LIFT STATION DIALER-SEWER DEPT
13529 PATTY BESSER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
13530 DAVID BLACK MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER
13531 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT/
PLANNING DEPT
13532 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMM
U
N
I
T
Y
C
E
N
T
E
R
13533 TIM BLOCK BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
13534 LOIS BOETTCHER -MINUTES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION/
PARK RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM
13535 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO CAPACITOR-PARK MAINTENANCE
50.00
497.75
501.18
58.41
210.00
25.00
1700.37
168.03
825.03
63.00
45.45
41.00
175.50
192.35
237.60
162.06
270.40
2214.75
32.12
374.18
16.61
145.70
100.00
1512.93
98.20
360.00
28.50
114.38
886.13
46.50
125.82
17.38
'195484
MARCH 19,1991
13536 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO EXPENSES-POOL LESSONS 22.65
13537 BUYER FORD TRUCKS INC STRAP/BRAKE REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61.79
'9 538 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC -SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS RD/MITCHELL RD & 14424.73
-& RESEARCH RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS/MITCHELL
-RD EXTENSION & SANDY POINTE ADDITION/HWY
-5 SO FRONTAGE RD/DELEGARD PROPERTY
SANITARY SEWER
13539 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC VACUUM CLEANER REPAIR-FACILITIES DEPT 20.00
13540 BRW INC -SERVICE-DELL RD & EVENER WAY FEASIBILITY 7924.18
-STUDY/VALLEY VIEW RD-BITTERSWEET TO
HOWARD DR/VALLEY VIEW RD
13541 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC -FEBRUARY & MARCH 91 WASTE DISPOSAL 2632.40
SERVICE
13542 BUILDING 9 CONDO ASSN REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 2162.48
13543 C & N W TRANSP CO WATER MAIN & STORM SEWER RENTAL 300.00
13544 CARBONIC MACHINES INC FLAKED ICE MACHINE-FITNESS CENTER 1466.00
13545 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL DEPT 2407.39
13546 CENTRAIRE INC -INSTALLED AIR DUCTS & DAMPER SYSTEM TO 3503.13
-2ND FLOOR-$2990-HOMEWARD HILLS BARN/
-REPLACED DRAFT INDUCER MOTOR/BLOWER MOTOR/
HEAT PUMP REPAIR-FACILITIES DEPT
13547 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS -BRAKE FLUID/LUBRICANT/CLUTCH & CHOKE 239.23
REPAIR/ROPE/ANVIL/PUNCH-PARK MAINTENANCE
13548 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC -VALVES/PINS/WASHERS/SPACERS/SWITCH/SEALS/ 1455.91
-SLACK ADJUSTERS/CLAMPS/FITTINGS/HYDRAULIC
-HOSES/COMPRESSORS/CORE/BEARINGS/BRAKE
LININGS/BRAKE DRUM TURNING-EQUIPMENT MAINT
13549 COCA COLA VENDING SERV INC POP-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 186.00
550 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 161.89
J551 COMPUTERWARE DATA PRODUCTS INC COMPUTER PAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER 40.00
13552 CONCEPT MICROFILM INC -MICROFILM READER PRINTER REPAIR/PAPER/ 846.00
-MICROFILMING-ENGINEERING DEPT/HISTORICAL
& CULTURAL COMMISSION
13553 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC -CAP WINTER LINERS/SAFETY GOGGLES/MASKS/ 500.58
-HEARING PROTECTION EARMUFF/ASPIRATOR BULB/
SMOKE TUBES-SAFETY DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE
13554 COPIES NOW OFFICE SUPPLIES-PLANNING DEPT 17.40
13555 CORPORATE REPORT MINNESOTA SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT 29.00
13556 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC FEBRUARY 91 INSURANCE CONSULTANT SERVICE 560.00
13557 CROWN MARKING INC RUBBER STAMP-FACILITIES DEPT 24.20
13558 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC DRILL BITS-WATER DEPT 201.06
13559 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 3459.41
13560 WILLIAM DAGGETT VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 24.00
13561 DECORATIVE DESIGNS MARCH 91 SERVICE-CITY HALL 49.50
13562 EUGENE DIETZ FEBRUARY 91 EXPENSES/DUES-ENGINEERING DEPT 225.00
13563 DIRECT SAFETY CO DRIVER-WATER DEPT 38.00
13564 DIVE RESCUE INC/INTL CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT 240.00
13565 DPC INDUM!RIES INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 1131.00
13566 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 5.98
13567 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 166.86
13568 DYNA SYSTEMS SCREWS/WASHERS/ANCHORS-WATER DEPT 397.38
13569 E P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT 64.24
13570 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISION -FEBRUARY 91 PEST
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
-
F
I
R
E
100.00
STATIONS
3571 EDEN PRAIRIE HIGH SCHOOL ART DEPT SERVICE-FACE PAIN
T
I
N
G
-
S
O
C
I
A
L
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
50.00
4513739
MARCH 19.1991
13572 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT
3573 CITY OF EDINA
3574 DEB EDLUND
13575 ELSMORE AQUATIC
13576 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
13577 ENTERPRISE MEDIA INC
13578 BRAD ERICKSEN
13579 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC
13580 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC
13581 FIRST TECH COMPUTER
13582 THE FITNESS STORE
13583 FIVE STAR CONSTRUCTION INC
13584 FLOYD SECURITY
13585 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
13586 MICHAEL D FRANZEN
13587 G & K SERVICES
13588 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
13589 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC
13590 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVIC
13591 W W GRAINGER INC
7592 ALAN GRAY
3593 GRAYBOW-DANIELS CO
13594 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
13595 HACH CO
13596 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC
13597 HARMON GLASS
13598 HAROLD F AWE CO
13599 ROGER HAWKINSON
13600 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
13601 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
13602 HEWN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT
13603 HENNEPIN PARKS
13604 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
13605 D C HEY COMPANY INC
13606 HOFFERS INC
13607 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES
13608 THE IMAGE DEVELOPERS
13609 IBM CORPORATION
13610 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272
_3611 INDUS-TOOL
51.00062
SCHOOL/TROPHIES-FIRE DEPT 131.99
FEBRUARY 91 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 220.00
MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 125.00
UNIFORMS-POOL OPERATIONS 130.48
-SAFETY GLOVES/PAINT/EAR PLUGS-UTILITIES 181.68
DIVISION/SAFETY DEPT
VIDEO RENTAL-PLANNING DEFT 40.00
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 63.00
POSTAGE-CITY HALL 54.14
RECONFIGURE WORK STATIONS-PLANNING DEPT 118.00
-COMPUTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-HUMAN 736.00
RESOURCES DEPT
CHARTS/EQUIPMENT REPAIR-FITNESS CENTER 81.00
FINAL PAYMENT-REMODELING AT FIRE STATION 6250.00
-2ND QUARTER 91 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINT 64.00
AGREEMENT -CMIMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 472.25
MILEAGE/CONFERENCE-PLANNING DEPT 56.00
-COVERATJS-WATER/TOWELS-PARK MAINTENANCE/ 856.62
LIQUOR STORE
SERVICE-FITNESS CENTER 30.86
FEBRUARY 91 EXPENSES-SOLID WASTE MGMT 2012.50
TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 68.94
-BATTERY CHARGER/BARRIER TAPE/BATTERIES/ 639.08
-SAW BLADES/DRY & WET VACUUM CLEANER-SEWER
-DEPT/FACILITIES DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/PARK
MAINTENANCE
FEBRUARY 91 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 200.00
SEAT-CENTER CARE PROGRAM 21.40
-BREAKER ASSEMBLY/GRIP/CONNECTION-SEWER 217.34
DEPT
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 40.65
-SERVICE-CEDAR RIDGE STORM SEWER/RED ROCK 30956.01
-SHORES/BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION/CEDAR
RIDGE RD & CORRAL LANE
REPLACED WINDSHIELD-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 153.36
REFUND-MECHANICAL GAMES LICENSE 50.00
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 186.00
FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 47.00
JANUARY 91 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 2473.00
JANUARY 91 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 471.96
-SKI LESSONS-WINTER SKILL DEVELOPMENT 1202.00
PROGRAM
SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEFT 120.00
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT 30.00
-PAINT/VARNISH/PAINT BRUSHES/PAINT THINNER- 89.00
PARK MAINTENANCE
-2ND QUARTER 91 SECURITY MAINTENANCE 84.25
AGREEMENT-SENIOR CENTER
DECALS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 240.00
TYPEWRITER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 143.00
-WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER/BUS 1936.86
-SERVICE-SPORTS & OUTDOOR PROGRAM/ROOM
RENTAL-ADULT PROGRAMS
FREIGHT FOR LEG WARMERS-FACILITIES DEFT 7.25
(0'2 Z
MARCH 19,1991
13612 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC
13613 INSTY-PRINTS
J614 INTL CONFERENCE OF BLDG OFFICIALS
13615 IPNA MINNESOTA
13616 GARY ISAACS
13617 J & R RADIATOR CORP
13618 DEAN JACOBS
13619 JERRYS NEWMARKET
13620 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
13621 CARL JULLIE
13622 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC
13623 DAN N KANTAR
13624 KEVIN KASTELLE
13625 SCOTT KIPP
13626 KLEVE HEATING
13627 KNOX
13628 STEVE KNUTSON
13629 DEAN KOCKELMAN
13630 MARY KOTTKE
13631 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER
-3632 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
13633 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
13634 LAMETTRYS COLLISION
13635 CINDY LANENBERG
13636 LANG PAUL? & GREGERSON LTD
13637 LMCIT
13638 LIONS TAP
13639 STEVE LIPE
13640 LJ ELECTRONIC INDUSTRY
13641 LOGIS
13642 LOW VOLTAGE CONTRACTORS INC
13643 LUNDS
13644 M-V GAS CO
13645 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
13646 ROBERT H MASON HOMES
13647 MATRX MEDICAL INC
13648 JEAN MATTIACCI
13649 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS
13650 PAT MCCARTY
'3651 JULIA MCFADDEN
365 9
AHMAD MCGOWAN
8481985
LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT 188.79
-PRINTING-FORMS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/ 157.10
BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT
BOOK-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 34.20
DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 30.00
-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS 320.00
COORDINATOR/FEES PAID
RADIATOR REPAIR-SEWER DEPT 157.00
MILEAGE-ASSESSING DEPT 8.00
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 72.32
-4 FILE CABINETS-$1176/OFFICE SUPPLIES- 1892.85
WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT
FEBRUARY 91 EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION 67.46
-STANDBY GENERATOR ENGINEERING SERVICE- 930.18
SEWER DEPT
PLIERS/TORCH/WIRE CRIMPTER-EQUIPMENT MAINT 125.75
KARATE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 200.20
MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT 10.00
-INSTALLED FURNACE VENT PIPE-HOUSING 235.00
REHABILITATION PROGRAM
PLYWOOD-PARK MAINTENANCE 118.94
BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 15.50
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 255.75
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 99.00
-BULBS/DRILLS/PAILS/BATTERIES/HOOKS/PIPE 605.43
-INSULATION/LIGHT BULBS/SHOWER MASSAGER/
-CLAMPS/RODS/TAPE/NOZZLES/PAINT BRUSHES/
-VALVES/SPRAY PAINT/WIRE BRUSH/LUBRICANT-
WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE
2 RADARS-POLICE DEPT 2020.00
-GLOVE LINERS/TAPAE/LAB SUPPLIES-WATER 379.22
DEPT/SAFETY DEPT
INSTALLED DECALS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 70.00
MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT 40.75 -DECEMBER 90 LEGAL SERVICE/JANUARY 91 22605.19 PROSECUTION SERVICE
LIABILITY INSURANCE 44672.00 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 205.27 STORM DOORS-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 680.52 ANTENNA-POLICE DEPT 27.05 -POSTAGE-HOMESTEAD APPLICATION CARDS- 1889.72 ASSESSING DEPT
SERVICE-FIRE ALARM INSPECTION-POLICE BLDG 200.00 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 69.28 GAS-OUTDOOR CENTER 259.25 -VACUUM/COLLARS/PLOW BLADES-SEWER DEPT/ 4914.98 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
WATER & SEWER SERVICE-RED ROCK LAKE PARK 806.85 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 124.32 VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60.00 -TYPESETTING FLYER-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 35.00 PROGRAM
CONFERENCE-SEWER DEPT 76.30 MILEAGE-AQUATICS SUPERVISOR 36.16 VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 124.50
to 1'2: E.
MARCH 19.1991
13653 MCNEILUS STEEL INC
13654 A MEAT SHOPPE
1 3655 MEDICINE LAKE LINES
3656 MENARDS
13657 METRO SALES INC
13658 METROPOLITAN AREA MGRS ASSN
13659 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
13660 METROPOLITAN MECH CONTR INC
13661 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS
13662 MIDWEST TELETRON INC
13663 DEE MILLER
13664 MINNCOMM PAGING
13665 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY
13666 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS
13667 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
13668 MINNESOTA FRAMES & PRINTS
13669 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL INC
13670 R E MOONEY & ASSOCIATES INC
13671 MOTOROLA INC
13672 WM MUELLER & SONS INC
13673 MUNITECH INC
13674 R J MUONIO BUILDERS & REMODELERS
13675 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
13676 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN
13677 NEATABLES
3678 JAN NELSON
.3679 DENNIS NESBITT
13680 BETH NILSSON
13681 NORTH STAR SOUND INC
13682 ARIK S NORBY
13683 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO
13684 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT INC
13685 CURT OBERLANDER
13686 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
13687 OFFISOURCE INC
13688 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC
13689 OLSEN FIRE PROTECTION
13690 ORION RESEARCH INC
13691 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER
13692 JERRY FARNHAM
13693 J W PEPPER OF MPLS
13694 PEPSI COLA COMPANY
13695 CONNIE L PETERS
3696 CHERYL PETERSON
3695560
STEEL PIPE-PARK MAINTENANCE 178.84
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 79.02
BUS SERVICE-ADULT PROGRAMS 184.00
FENCING-PARK MAINTENANCE 270.84
TONER/OIL-POLICE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER 526.45
EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 12.25
BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT 3.50
VALVE LEAK REPAIR-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CTR 299.56
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT 240.28
TELEPHONE HEADSET-CITY HALL 161.10
MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT 19.00
MARCH 91 PAGER SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 58.48
BAGS-LIQUOR STORE 99.20
PRINTING FORMS-CITY HALL 369.60
-HEAT SCANNER-$750-BUILDING INSPECTIONS 13692.05
-DEPT/UNIFORMS-$12036/REFLECTIVE LETTERS -
FIRE DEPT
MAP FRAMES-PARK PLANNING DEPT 684.60
CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 125.00
PAINT-WATER DEPT 633.25
RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 1502.20
SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL DEPT 839.93
PROPELLAR METERHEAD REPAIR-WATER DEPT 265.73
-INSTALLATION OF WINDOWS & DOORS-7126 6599.00
BAKER RD-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
POSTERS-SAFETY DEPT 10.63
EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 119.70
1ST AID SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 188.42
MINUTES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION 75.00
-CONFERENCE/MILEAGE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS 102.40
DEPT
SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID
5871.08
-CONSULTING SERVICE FOR CHANGES TO
65.00
AMPHITHEATRE-PARK MAINTENANCE
-POSTER DESIGN & LAYOUT SERVICE-HISTORICAL 22.50
& CULTURAL COMMISSION
IGNITORS/LAMPS/FUSES-STREET LIGHTING DEFT 192.41
-SNAP RINGS/BEARINGS/IMPELLAR/GASKETS/ 2172.76
SHAFT SLEEVE/O-RINGS-WATER DEPT
GAS FOR FIRE VEHICLE-FIRE DEPT 12.70
-COMPUTER SOFIWARE UPGRADE-WATER DEPT/ 168.00
LABELS-CITY HALL
CHAIR REPAIR-FACILITIES DEPT 51.97
-POUCH HOOKS/CLAMPS/PLIERS/CABLE ASSEMBLY/ 182.99
-CHAINS-SNOW & ICE CONTROL DEPT/FORESTRY
DEPT
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT SPRINKLER PERMIT 5.00
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 64.48
PHYSICAL EXAM-POLICE DEPT 202.00
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60.00
SHEET MUSIC-ART & MUSIC PROGRAM 411.18
-CARBON DIOXIDE TANKS-POOL MAINTENANCE- 60.00
COMMUNITY CENTER
MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADMINISTRATION 24.50
CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 49.00
(012F
MARCH 19.1991
13697 G C PETERSON MACHINERY CO INC
13698 PITNEY BOWES INC
3699 POKORNY COMPANY
13700 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CO
13701 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
13702 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13703 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13704 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13705 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13706 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13707 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13708 PRAIRIE HARDWARE
13709 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN
13710 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
13711 PRIDE & PERFORMANCE INC
13712 PROTOOL
3713 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC
3714 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC
13715 R & R SPECIALTIES INC
13716 FRANK RACKSTRAN
13717 RADIO SHACK
13718 REUTER RECYCLING INC
13719 RIDDLE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC
13720 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC
13721 RORY RISK JR
13722 ROGERS SERVICE
13723 PAUL ROHE CONSTRUCTION
13724 ROLLINS OIL CO
13725 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO
13726 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION
13727 SAFETY & TRAINING SERVICES
13728 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC
13729 JOHN SANS
13730 SANCO INC
3731 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC
2969926
PLANER KNIVES/STAND/CASTERS-PARK MAINT 301.70
-2ND QUARTER 91 POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY 117.00
HALL
VALVES-FACILITIES DEFT 15.00
BRAKE ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 191.20
-REPLACED EMERGENCY BATTERY BACKUP UNITS- 744.40
COMMUNITY CENTER
DOCKS/PAINT/PAINT BRUSHES-FIRE DEPT 45.68
-BULBS/BATTERIES/CAULKING GUN/KEYS/VELCRO/ 136.03
-BRACKETS/SCREWDRIVER-BUILDING INSPECTIONS
DEPT/FACILITIES DEPT/ENGINEERING DEPT
-KEYS/BUNGE CORDS/BROOM/DUCT TAPE/GLUE/ 124.44
-RUST REMOVER/HOOKS/CLIPS/DRILL BITS/DCOR
SWEEPS-COMMUNITY CENTER
-PAINT THINNER/PAINT BRUSHES/SANDPAPER/ 126.51
-RODS/PAINT/CAULKING/KEYS/BIRD SEED-PARK
MAINTENANCE
BOLTS/DRILL BITS-SEWER DEPT 12.72
BATTERY/WRENCH/SOCKET-STREET DEPT 19.01
-RODS/HOSE ENDS/HOSES/NOZZLES/WASHERS/ 325.85
-BRACKETS/CLEANING SUPPLIES/BATTERIES -
WATER DEPT
-SNOW BLOWER STARTER/DRIVE BELT-FACILITIES 112.62
DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-PRINTING-EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER-HUMAN 208.50
RESOURCES DEFT
PLAQUE-HUMAN RIGHTS PROGRAM 409.13
ROUTER BIT-PARK MAINTENANCE 12.90
TELEPHONE REPAIR-CITY HALL 242.50
REBUILT NOZZLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 57.00
-ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/IMPELLAR/EXHAUST 246.70
REPAIR-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 56.14
PLUGS/ADAPTERS/EARPHONE-POLICE DEPT 35.10
WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 69.72
THUMBSCREW-SIGNS DEPT 17.23
-SERVICE-MITCHELL RD CONST/WASTE WATER 13351.31
-FLOW STUDY/SUNRISE CIRCLE & STARRING LANE
FEASIBILITY STUDY
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
27.00
ALTERNATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
181.70
-INSTALLATION OF 00ORS/LOCKS/INSULATION-
3380.00
-11195 SUNNYBROOK-HOUSING REHABILIATION
PROGRAM
GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7599.00
-OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/WATER DEPT/PARK 143.93
MAINTENANCE/POLICE DEPT
-TOWELS/CARBURETOR CLEANER-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 212.75
PARK MAINTENANCE
SAFETY VIDEO-WATER DEPT 181.00
CRAFT SUPPLIES-SOCIAL PROGRAM 123.40
MILEAGE-ASSESSING DEPT 13.00
-CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/ 810.74
COMMUNITY CENTER/VACUUM-MOO-COMMUNITY CTR
-DISTRIBUTOR/BUMPER/CORD/BELT-FACILITIES 48.35
DEPT
G
-JANUARY & FEBRUARY 91 EXPENSES-BUILDING
INSPECTIONS DEPT
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEFT
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-ADULT PROGRAMS
-SWITCH-WATER DEPT/CABLE ASSEMBLY/
CARBURETOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-REFLECTIVE LETTERS-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
TYPESETTING-SENIOR NEWSLETTER
DIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT
-IMPACT GUN/WRENCH/PLIERS/BATTERY/CHISEL-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
-2ND QUARTER 91 SERVICE/3RD QUARTER 91
PROGRAMING BUDGET
LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT
REFLECTIVE EMBLEMS-FIRE DEPT
BUS SERVICE-ADULT PROGRAMS
VALVES-WATER DEPT
-WHEEL ALIGNMENTS/BOLTS/SPRINGS-WATER DEPT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
RINGS/GASKETS-WATER DEPT
WELL PUMP REPAIR-WATER DEPT
-LAMP/FLASHLIGHTS/SIREN & LIGHT CONTROL
-SYSTEMS/MICROPHONES/MOTOR/REMAINING
-SEATS/LIGHT BAR ASSEMBLIES/GRILLE & DECK
-LIGHTS/IGNITION SECURITY SYSTEMS-POLICE
DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-SERVICE-DELL RD & SCENIC HEIGHTS RD/HWY
5 FRONTAGE RD/MITCHELL LAKE SANITARY SEWER
LAMP ASSEMBLY/THERMOSTAT/HUB CAPS/CABLE/
CARBURETOR-WATER DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-REPAIR DAMAGE DUE TO SEWER & WATER
PROJECT-SUMMIT & MEADOWVALE DR
SEWER SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE
PHASE MONITOR REPAIRS-WATER DEPT
RACQUETBALL RACQUETS-RACQUETBALL PROGRAM
EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING DEFT
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
REIMBURSEMENT FOR SEWER DAMAGE
SHEET MUSIC-ART & MUSIC PROGRAM
-ACETYLENE/HELIM1 -EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/
FIRE DEPT
UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT
UNIFORMS-POLICE DEFT
CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
BADGES-SKATING LESSONS
CHEMICAL FEEDER PARTS-WATER DEPT
400.00
135.00
51.83
310.00
5.95
368.25
510.13
459.96
490.20
45.00
32.94
641.15
19.91
10282.36
766.80
136.50
1640.00
13.20
511.50
57.00
30.88
607.00
9497.11
8382.33 :
911.20
1482.05 '
80.00
378.00
59.96
15.00
278.29
124.00
123.00
83.75
193.86
119.35
32.65
331.51
257.75
476.15
13732 KEVIN SCHMIEG
13733 RON SCHWARTZ
13734 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION
13735 TIM SENSION
3736 KERRY SETTEN
13737 SHAKOPEE FORD INC
13738 SIGN A RAMA USA
13739 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CTR
13740 SMITH DIVING
13741 PETER SMITH
13742 W GORDON SMITH CO
13743 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
13744 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC
13745 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI
13746 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
13747 SPECIALTY SCREENING
13748 SPIRIT COACHES INC
13749 SPS COMPANIES
13750 STANDARD SPRING CO
13751 JOAN STRASBURG
13752 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY
13753 STEVENS WELL DRILLING CO INC
13754 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ
13755 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC
13756 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
13757 SUPERIOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS INC
13758 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE
13759 SYSTEM CONTROL SERVICES
13760 TARGET STORES
13761 LOWELL THONE
13762 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC
13763 KEVIN TIMM
13764 TOM TONKIN
13765 TRESTMAN MUSIC CENTER
13766 TWIN CITY WINE CO
13767 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
13768 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
13769 UNITED LABORATORIES INC
13770 THE US FIGURE SKATING ASSN
13771 VESSCO INC
4034152
1,
MARCH 19.1991
13772 VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS
13773 VICOM INC
i3774 VIKING LABORATORIES INC
13775 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
13776 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY
13777 VWR SCIENTIFIC INC
13778 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO
13779 WATER PRODUCTS CO
13780 SANDRA F WERTS
13781 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER
13782 WEST WELD
13783 ROBERTA WICK
13784 JAMES ZALESKY
13785 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
13786 ZIEGLER INC
12853 VOID OUT CHECK
13127 VOID OUT CHECK
13135 VOID OUT CHECK
13282 VOID OUT CHECK
13317 VOID OUT CHECK
13343 VOID OUT CHECK
13443 VOID our (-NECK
177069
ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY CENTER
-MARCH 91 WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-
COMUNITY CENTER
CHEMICALS-POOL OPERATIONS
EXPENSES-SENIOR PROGRAMS
ADAPTERS-FACILITIES DEPT
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
-0-RINGS/BEARINGS/SEALS FOR PUMPS-SEWER
DEPT
-COUPLINGS/GASKETS/VALVE BOX KEY/VALVES/
-GENERATORS/REMOTE READERS/PVC PIPE-WATER
DEPT/DRAINAGE CONTROL DEPT
MILEAGE/EXPENSES-RECREATION SUPERVISOR
1ST QUARTER 91 SERVICE-HUMAN SERVICES DEPT
WIRE/LENSES/CABLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
1ST AID SUPPLIES-STREET MAINTENANCE
SWITCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
110.00
7.00
308.55
14.00
111.00
131.84
574.25
1177.35
174.39
375.00
399.31
150.00
180.00
11.95
26.11
200.00-
1105.00-
131.00-
82.50-
352.31-
108.25-
1.00-
$499100.44 ,
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
268933.23
57451.13
35031.34
806.85
3747.12
74784.42
31621.50
4856.84
250.00
10633.49
10984.52
10 GENERAL
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP
33 UTILITY BOND FUND
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
79 RALF
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
87 CDBG FUND
$499100.44
March 7. 1 9 Q1
Dear Mayor Tenpas and City Council.
I regret to Inform you that I must region from the Eden
Prairie Human Righ7:s and Services Commission effective Aor11
I. 1991. Our house has been sold and we are moving out of
the community. This saddens me for two reasons. First. I
have enioyea tremendously mv five Year association with this
commission. I believe the direction in which we have been
moving has ibeen of benefit to the residents of our community
and I am Particularly Pleased that the commission has taken
a more active role in the area of human rights. In
aooition. toe duality ano oecication of all HRSC mempers is
commendacle. I will truly miss workina with this fine croup
ot peoce.
tn aodition to leaving toe commission. I am truly
lacc:?necl MDCUr leavino Ecen Prairie. our home for 17 years.
nrcum : have always ceen tC say "I live in Eden
I rave coasted acout the aualitv of life.
including its crowth. its services and its leadership.
Althouch we are not movina far away (Shorewood). I will miss
calling Eden Prairie mv home.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve my community.
It has been most rewarding. I wish you all continued
success as You plan for the future.
Sincerely.
Gail Leiloold. Chair
Human Rignts and Services Commission
c. Natalie Swaaaert
3-1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources'—
DATE: March 8, 1991
SUBJECT: Policy on Past Due Rental of Facilities
The City of Eden Prairie has consistently had a policy of billing for rental of facilities on a
monthly basis at the Eden Prairie Community Center. The vast majority of individuals and
groups that rent facilities at the Community Center pay these monthly bills on time and in full.
At this time, we have one organization that has paid less than 50% of the rental due for 1990
and has made no payments on rentals due for 1991. Although, we have had many telephone
conversations with the organization and there have been promises for payment, they have not
been forthcoming. City staff requests the Council adopt a policy on past due fees in order to
clarify for staff, as well as facility renters, what steps the City will take in order to assure
prompt payment for rental of facilities.
PROPOSED POLICY:
The City of Eden Prairie will bill all individuals or groups renting facilities at the Eden Prairie
Community Center on a monthly basis. Statements will be sent out on the first working day of
each month for the previous month's rental fees. The renter will have until the 15th of the
month to submit payment in full for the previous month's rental of the facility. If payment is
not received within the proposed period, the City will then begin charging interest on the balance
at 8% and if payment is not received by the 30th of the month, the individual or group will be
barred from further use of the facilities until payment is received, or a payment schedule is
negotiated.
BL:mdd
policy/5
640
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-63
(LC. 52-173)
PRELIMINARY LAYOUT APPROVAL
CSAH 62 LAYOUT PLAN
CSAH 60 TO CSAH 4
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Public Works has prepared a
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
layout for CSAH 62 between CSAH 60 and CSAH 4 and is designated Layout
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
(revision dated 02-02-91) for Project Number 6312;
WHEREAS, the improvement of this roadway would be beneficial to the health,
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
welfare of the City of Eden Prairie by providing much needed transportation corrid
o
r
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
the community; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires that the improvements be provided at
t
h
e
e
a
r
l
i
e
s
t
convenient date.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CO
U
N
C
I
L
t
h
a
t
said Layout Number 1 is hereby approved preliminarily, and that the County
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
authorized by the City to acquire all rights of way, permits and/or easements requi
r
e
d
f
o
r
s
a
i
d
improvement in accordance with said Layout No. 1 and prepare final plans and spe
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
subject to the following:
A. The City reserves the right to review the final construction document prior to
final approval of the design.
B. The County will comply with Eden Prairie's Tree Replacement Ordinance.
C. As previously agreed, the County will overlay and improve the shoulders of the
in-place section of the frontage road prior to turn-back to the City.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 19, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
441
INTERVIEWS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION
NOTE: The Council will meet at 7:00 PM to interview candidates to fill the
vacancy on the Human Rights & Services Commission
TUESDAY, APRIL 2, 1991
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean
Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the
City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director
of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Roberta Wick
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATION OF THE POLICE & FIRE DEPARTMENTAL COMMENDATION TO JOAN JOHNSON
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 26 1991
B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 19 1991
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Release of Special Assessment Agreement between the City and
Hestia Homes Inc. for the Construction of Valley View Road through
the Prairie Knolls Subdivision
C Award Contract for Street Sweeping, I.C. 52-222 (Resolution No.
7:76)
D. Award Contract for Portable Engine-Generator Set I.C. 52-215
(i5lution No. 91-75)
E. Authorize Mayor and City Manager to Execute Agreement and
Restrictive Covenant for Each of 4—Properties Purchase through
the Metropolitan Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Fund
Page 642
Page 643
Page 653
Page 668
Page 670
Page 672
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 2, 1991
Page Two
V.
VI.
F. TIMBER BLUFFS by Brown Land Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance
No. 50-88-PUD-14-88, Rezoning from Rural to PUD-14-88-R1-22 on
approximately 4 acres, from Rural to PUD-14-88-R1-44 on
approximately 15 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement;
Adoption of Resolution No. 91-86, Authorizing Summary and
Ordering Publication of Ordinance No. 50-88-PUD-14-88; 44.4
acres into 14 single family lots, and 2 outlots. Location:
Southeast Eden Prairie, south of Riverview Road, west of
County Road 18, and east of Huntington Drive. (Ordinance
No. 50-88-PUD-14-88 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 91-86 -
Authorizing Summary, Order Publication)
G. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Study for I.C. 52-189, Braxton Street and UtiTTEi Improvements (Resolution No.91-85)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications TOT.—T.c. 52-205 (Street and Utility-Tmprovements on Sunrise Circle) Resolution No. §17-78
B. FAIRFIELD 1991 AMENDMENT by Centex Real Estate Corporation.
Request foi-Timing District Amendment within the R1-9.5 Zoning
District on 23 acres; Adoption of Resolution No. 91-64, Planned
Unit Development Concept Amendment on 118.2 acres; Planned Unit
Development District Review with waivers on 23 acres; Adoption of
Resolution No. 91-65, Preliminary Plat of 23 acres into 61
single family lots and road right-of-way to be known as Fairfield
1991 Amendment. Location: North of Stanley Trail, north of
Candlewood Parkway (Ordinance No. 10-91-PUD-4-91 - Zoning
District Amendment; Resolution No. 91-64 - PUD Concept Amendment;
Resolution No. 91-65 - Preliminary Plat)
C. VACATION 91-04 Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements and Street Right-of-Way within an Undeveloped Portion of Bluffs West (Resolution No. 91-71)--
D. VACATION 88-01 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION FOR PART OF ONTARIO BOULEVARD-lution No. 91-74)
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
A. WELTER'S PURGATORY ACRES 6TH ADDITION by Peter Andrea Company.
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 7-91, Zoning District Change from
Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.95 acres with variances reviewed by the
Board of Appeals; Approval of Developer's Agreement; Adoption
of Resolution No. 91-82, Authorizing Summary and Ordering
Publication of Ordinance 7-91; 10.95 acres into single family
lots, 1 outlot and road right-of-way to be known as Welter's
Purgatory Acres 6th Addition. Location: North of Welter's Way
and south of Sunnybrook Road. (Ordinance No. 7-91 - Zoning
District Change; Resolution No. 91-82 - Authorizing Summary and
Ordering Publication)
Page 677
Page 686
Page 690
Page 691
Page 702
Page 706
Page 709
Page 710
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 2, 1991
Page Three
B. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 11-91 Regarding Dumping Household
Requse in Public Trash ReceptiTTi-i
VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce Business Survey
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS COMMISSIONS, & COMMITTEES
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Human Rights & Services Commission - Appointment to fill an
unexpired term to 2/28/92 on the Human Rights & Services
Commission
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. Reports of Councilmembers
B. Report of City Manager
1. Revenue Bond Fees
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 720
Page 723
Page 726
CITY OFFICES 1 7710 EXECUTIVE OfiriE EOEN AN 55:444677 7ELEPHCNE 5I2I337-1252
April 2, 1991
Joan Johnson
COMMENDATION
On February 10, 1991, at approximately 10:20 a.m., your neighbor came to your residence
requesting your assistance for his wife. You went to his home and found his wife in full cardiac
arrest. You began cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) immediately and continued for
approximately 10 minutes until Police and Fire Rescue personnel arrived. When the
Paramedics arrived, they were able to defibrillate the victim and restore her heart rate. The
Paramedics in the ambulance attributed the remarkable recovery of the victim to your
immediately starting CPR.
Because of your clear thinking and quick actions, a potential fatality was avoided. You helped
give your neighbor a second chance.
On behalf of the City of Eden Prairie, we would like to commend you for your outstanding
lifesaving effort.
K
Keith J. Wall Cheryl Petersen
Chief of Police Awards Committee Chairperson
Spencer Conrad
Fire Chief
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 1991
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson,
Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and
Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Finance
Director John D. Frane, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Robert
Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene
Dietz, City Assessor Steve Sinell,
Director of Inspections Kevin Schmieg,
Police Chief Keith Wall, Director of
Human Resources & Community Services
Natalie Swaggert, and Recording
Secretary Jan Nelson
(' 'DLL CALL -- Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 6:15 PM.
A
l
l
members were present. Jessen arrived late.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The following items were added to the agenda: IV.A. Naegele
Signs; IV.B. B.F.I. contribution to Southwest Corridor
Coalition; and IV.C. Date for Joint Presentation to City Council
And School Board.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Agenda
as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously.
II. BTUDY ITEMS
A. Budget/Revenue Projections
The Council postponed this item until Jessen's arrival.
III. hPPOINTMENTS
A. Board of Appeals & Adjustments (3 three-year terms
commencing March 1, 1991)
Tenpas said there was a resignation from this Board so there
is an additional unexpired two-year term to be filled.
City Council Meeting 2 February 26, 1991
Neil E. Akemann, Sharon Roe Anderson
,
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
J
.
W
i
l
k
u
s
a
n
d
John E. Freemyer each received three
o
r
m
o
r
e
v
o
t
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
first ballot.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by P
i
d
c
o
c
k
,
t
o
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
J
o
h
n
E. Freemyer to the unexpired two-yea
r
t
e
r
m
o
n
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Appeals 6 Adjustments. Motion carri
e
d
u
n
a
n
i
m
o
u
s
l
y
.
B. Building Code Board of Appeals (2 three-year terms
commencing March 1, 1991)
Allan Callender (4 votes) and Rober
t
C
.
L
e
b
e
c
k
(
3
v
o
t
e
s
)
were elected to the two three-year t
e
r
m
s
o
n
t
h
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Code Board of Appeals.
C. Flyina Cloud Airport Advisory Commissi
o
n
(2 three-year
terms)
Tenpas said he had met one of the ca
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
s
,
A
n
d
r
e
w
D
e
t
r
o
i
,
who was unable to attend the review sess
i
o
n
.
H
e
s
a
i
d
D
e
t
r
o
i
was involved with the F.A.A. and was
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
n
a
w
a
r
d
at the opening ceremony of the Air T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
s
'
School.
Kent Barker was elected to one thre
e
-
y
e
a
r
t
e
r
m
o
n
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
ballot with 4 votes. No candidate r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
three votes on the second ballot. C
o
u
n
c
i
l
d
e
c
i
d
e
d
t
o
d
e
f
e
r
the third ballot to Jessen's arriva
l
.
D. Historical & Cultural Commission (4 Positions: 1 unexpired
two-year term, and 3 three-year term
s
c
o
m
m
e
n
c
i
n
g
M
a
r
c
h
1
,
1991)
On the first ballot, Beth Beutell an
d
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
T
.
K
a
l
l
a
s
received 4 votes each, and Ronald A.
C
a
s
e
a
n
d
B
e
t
t
y
M
c
M
a
h
o
n
received 3 votes each.
MOT/ON: Harris moved, seconded by A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
,
t
o
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
Betty McMahon to the unexpired two-y
e
a
r
t
e
r
m
o
n
t
h
e
Historical & Cultural Commission. M
o
t
i
o
n
c
a
r
r
i
e
d
unanimously.
E. Human Rights & Services Commission (3 three-year terms
commencing March 1, 1991)
The election of Kent Barker to the F
l
y
i
n
g
C
l
o
u
d
A
d
v
i
s
o
r
y
Commission produced an additional un
e
x
p
i
r
e
d
t
w
o
-
y
e
a
r
t
e
r
n
o
n
this Commission.
Jessen arrived at 6:40 PM.
Dick Daniels and Virginia Gartner each received 5 vo
t
e
s
,
and Bette Anderson and Joan H. Engst
r
o
m
e
a
c
h
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
4
votes on the first ballot.
City Council Meeting 3 February 26, 1991
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to appoint
Joan H. Engstrom to the unexpired two-year term on the Human
Rights & Services Commission.
Tenpas said he thought it was more appropriate to appoint an
incumbent to the unexpired two-year term.
Vote on the Motion: Motion carried with Tenpas opposed.
C. Flying Cloud Advisory Commission (Continued)
After Jessen's arrival, the Council cast the second ballot
for the remaining three-year term on the Flying Cloud
Advisory Commission. Andrew Detroi was elected to serve the
term.
F. Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Commission (3
Positions: 1 one-year unexpired term, and 2 three-year
terms commencing March 1, 1991)
On the first ballot Patrick A. Richard received 5 votes,
Bruce Bowman received 3 votes and Diane Popovich Lynch
received 3 votes.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to appoint Bruce
Bowman to the unexpired one-year term on the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission.
Anderson said he recalled that previous discussion had been
to appoint Bowman and Richard to the three-year terms.
Motion was withdrawn by Pidcock with the consent of Harris.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to appoint Diane
Popovich Lynch to the unexpired one-year term on the Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Motion carried
unanimously.
G. Planning Commission (2 three-year terms commencing March 1,
1991)
Katherine C. Kardell and James B. (Jim) Hawkins were elected
to the Planning Commission on the first ballot.
H. Waste Management Commission (3 Positions: 1 two-year
unexpired term, and 2 three-year terms)
Timothy J. Colliton and Sharon Howard were elected to the
Waste Management Commission on the first ballot. No
candidate received the required 3 votes on ballots two,
three and four. Julie Ann Myhre received three votes on the
fifth ballot.
City Council Meeting 4 February 26, 1991
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to appoint Julie
Ann Myhre to the two-year unexpired term on the Waste
Management Commission. Motion carried unanimously.
II. STUDY ITEMS
A. Budget/Revenue Projections
Jullie reviewed the handout on 1991 property taxes
prepared by City Assessor Sinell and his staff. Pidcock
asked what the tax rates were for 1990 and 1991. Jullie
replied that it was 20.27% in 1990, and in 1991 we are at
21.04%.
Tenpas asked if most of the new tax base was primarily from
new construction. Sinell said it was mostly new
construction with a small amount of inflation last year.
Jullie noted that for 1991 the total tax rate is at 110.6%,
as compared to 101.3% last year. He said that Hopkins
School District No. 270 went up approximately 16% in 1991.
He said that district includes the Bryant Point and Carmel
neighborhoods. Harris said she thought it was important
that the news media stress the point that the increase for
those neighborhoods is primarily due to the School District
increase.
Jessen asked if District No. 270 had passed a referendum.
Sinell said a referendum was passed, and, based on
preliminary information, there will be a $63.00 increase on
a $100,000 house because of the levy.
Jessen asked how much revaluation was done and what the
average increase was on those properties. Sinell said one-
fourth of the homes were revaluated and the average change
was 2-3%. He noted that most of the changes occurred
because of physical changes in the properties since the last
revaluation.
Jessen asked if there was an inflationary factor on the
properties that were not revaluated. Sinell said generally
there was very little change in those properties. Jessen
asked what was the basis for changes to such properties.
Sinell said sales within the neighborhood enable them to
track areas that should be valued at a higher or lower rate.
Jullie noted that pages 3-9 are the same as those presented
at the budget hearing except that they have updated
information. Harris commented that the chart showing the
relatively low tax impact resulting from the City's rate
increase is very important for the Council because it
demonstrates the City's continued effort to hold the line on
expenses.
Jullie reviewed the highlights of the General Fund budget
forecasting material that was prepared by Assistant to the
City Council Meeting 5 February 26, 1991
City Manager Craig Dawson, Sinell and others. He said the
four-year forecast was prepared in order to estimate our
ability to maintain the goal of keeping a stable tax rate in
the face of the economic slowdown. He noted we have been
quite successful to date in maintaining that goal; however,
it will become increasingly difficult over the next few
years because of the economy, changes in state legislation,
and some of the major capital needs that we will have to
fund.
Jullie noted that the 1991 net tax capacity is $72.3
million. He said that, while commercial/industrial makes up
a large percentage of the tax base, one of the trends being
seen is towards property tax relief for these properties.
He said this will result in a shift of the tax burden to
residential property unless revenue is injected to offset
the trend.
Jullie said the 1991 adjusted net tax capacity is $58.9
million. Tenpas asked if that is a result of fiscal
disparities. Jullie said it is primarily due to fiscal
disparities with some due to our tax increment district.
A discussion followed regarding net tax capacity. Sinell
said net tax capacity is a new term for assessed value and
is the value to which the rates are applied. Jullie said it
represents the market value times the various property type
percentages.
Tenpas asked if net tax capacity is different from tax
revenue. Sinell said the tax revenue could be more or less
than 100% of the net tax capacity, depending on the tax levy
rates. Tenpas asked if we are over 100% because of the
fiscal disparities loss. Sinell said that was correct,
because if we had that in our tax base and divided our levy
into $72 million, our rate would be 15 or 16% instead of
21%.
Anderson said he was concerned about the newspaper report on
the Governor's proposal to drop taxes on
commercial/industrial and raise taxes on residential.
Tenpas said he understood that the proposal was to eliminate
the third tier rather than simply raising residential taxes.
Harris said she saw an article reporting a proposed
reduction of 1% (from 6% to 5%) on commercial.
Anderson said he thought the concern was that it would
decrease taxes on expensive homes and increase taxes on
cheaper homes. A discussion followed regarding the impact
of the Governor's proposed property tax changes. Sinell
said it is difficult to project how any of the proposals
would play out until we know how they propose to adjust the
school funding.
Tenpas asked where the cut in commercial/industrial will be
made up. Sinell said the tax policy determines how the tax
City Council Meeting 6 February 26, 1991
levy will be spread out and a change in policy may force a
shift from one type of property to another.
Tenpas said he is concerned that things such as fiscal
disparities or tax changes actually penalize a community
such as Eden Prairie that has deliberately tried to build a
diversified tax base. Pidcock said she thought diversity
was important for other reasons, not just to build a tax
base.
Sinell then illustrated the concept of tax capacity, how
cities may exceed or fall below 100% of tax capacity, and
how the state tries to maintain balance between out-state
cities and the metropolitan area.
A discussion followed regarding the possible effect of
additional revenue requirements on tax capacity and what
limits are imposed on tax capacity.
Anderson asked how the proposed tax increase as we
understand it would affect the average taxpayer in Eden
Prairie. Sinell said it would not affect the average
taxpayer because we do not receive local government aid.
Anderson noted, however, that any home valued over $178,000
will get a decrease in taxes and anything under that value
will receive an increase, thereby putting a greater burden
on the lower priced home. Pidcock said that the circuit
breaker would come into effect for the lower-priced home.
Discussion followed regarding the portion of taxes
attributable to debt service, particularly for the school
districts.
Tenpas asked about the effect of fiscal disparities on the
tax rate. Sinell said fiscal disparities affects only the
School District and City rates. Jullie said our property
taxes would be about 10% less without fiscal disparities.
Jullie said we estimate our general fund balance to be $2.5
million at the end of 1990, which is about 15% of our annual
expenditures.
Jessen asked what the balances are in the other funds.
Jullie said they are in the process of going through all of
the other funds, checking allocations made in previous
years, and making sure of the ending balances.
Tenpas asked if we will be able to project what revenues
will be for the next three or four years. Jullie said there
are windfalls such as the cable franchise sale and the BFI
settlement that are not necessarily predictable.
Jessen asked about the status of operating funds such as the
T.I.F. fund and the sewer and water fund. Finance Director
Frane said those are very healthy. Jullie said those are
City Council Meeting 7 February 26, 1991
typically dedicated to operating expenses and are not
available for capital expenditures.
Tenpas asked about the status of engineering fees. Jullie
said that balance was transferred out last year.
Jessen asked when we would know the balances of the other
funds. Frane said those should be available in a month and
a half. Jessen asked if we have an internal service fund.
Frane said we do not have such a fund.
Jullie reviewed the general assumptions used for the budget
forecast. He said they projected $60 million of new single-
family construction each year. A discussion followed
regarding the basis for the $60 million projection.
Pidcock asked if there has been a drop off in building
permits. Director of Inspections, Safety & Facilities
Schmieq said there has been about a 10% drop since
September. Anderson asked if the drop was in any particular
type of housing. Schmieg replied that there are no spec
homes being built; however, projects are going well.
Jullie said it looks like our next year's tax base will be
2.4% more than this year. Tenpas asked if that means we
could increase the City budget by 2.4% without affecting
taxes. Jullie said that was correct.
Tenpas said there is just not time for the Council to tie
all this information together, and yet the Council must be
able to make this understandable to the community. He said
he thought it was time to look at having a Finance
Commission to help both the Council and Staff with budgets
and to help communicate information to the community.
Jessen asked how often the Council reviews the budget status
year-to-date against the financial plan. Frane said it is
done quarterly. Tenpas said he would like to see the one-
page quarterly summary expanded and presented more often.
A discussion followed regarding revenues and expenditures
balancing out during the tax year. Harris commented that
during her tenure we have come out extremely well each year
for budgets and expenditures. Anderson said he recalled a
time in the early 80's when some problems occurred because
taxes were not being paid. Frane said that occurred when
developers were not paying their special assessments.
Pidcock commented that that can be expected in a recession.
Tenpas said he thought it was important for the Council to
have all the pieces of the puzzle in place so that if a tax
increase is necessary we can explain it to the community.
He said he would like to have a monthly breakdown of the
numbers. Harris asked if the same goal might not be
achieved by having periodic financial reports from the
Staff.
City Council Meeting 8 February 26, 1991
Jullie said they have been working on this and recently
extended an offer to an individual for the position of
Senior Accountant. He said they are developing a new budget
reporting format to bring to the Council so Staff can better
understand what the Council wants to see.
Tenpas said he thought a budget committee or a finance
commission would have the ability to sit down with the
departments to look at long term staffing requirements. He
said this would help to get information back in the process.
He said there are a lot of talented people in the community
and we could get their help free.
Harris said she had a problem determining what the mandate
for a finance commission would be. She said she thought we
have to be very careful not to get into micro-management of
the City. She felt the Council has not always articulated
its needs, and she has a concern about the Council relieving
itself of one of its principal responsibilities--the
stewardship of the City's revenues.
Tenpas said he agreed that the Council has the ultimate
responsibility for spending in this community, but he said
he doesn't have enough time to spend getting the information
necessary to know what is going on. Harris said she thought
the Council needs to define what we need to do our job and
then decide whether we need assistance in carrying out that
function. Pidcock noted that Edina uses corporate
executives on loan to help with specific projects.
A discussion followed regarding the use of a task force to
help in the organizing of the financial planning process.
Jessen said that, with some quality time spent and with the
new formatting to be worked out, we should be able to get
the information we need at budget time.
Director of Planning Eager said the staff members who are
attending the mini-MBA program at St. Thomas have learned
about the operation of the Budget Committee at St. Thomas.
He said it would be important to define the tasks of the
budget process. Sinell noted that St. Thomas included all
those who will be affected by the budget, including
students, staff and others. Sinell also noted the
importance of strategic planning as a starting point for the
process.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to limit the
discussion on the Working Draft of the 1991-1994 Budget
Forecast to 9:00 PM. Motion carried with Tenpas opposed.
Jessen said he thought we need to establish a calendar and
get to the process early so that we can address the levels
of tax, service levels, and other strategic and policy
decisions and then go back and make substantive policy and
allocation decisions at the Council level. Harris said she
City Council Meeting 9 February 26, 1991
thought that was important because until we do that we can't
give direction to anyone else, including a budget committee
or a commission.
Jessen said the new budget reporting format should be done
in April or May so that we could then have a budget strategy
session in June for next year's budget and still have a
couple of months for constructive budget work with the
department directors. He said that would allow the Council
to decide what the major priorities for the City will be.
Harris said that we could then revisit the issue of some
type of task force or committee at that time.
Tenpas said in summary that Staff will be back to the
Council in the next 60 days with a draft of a budget report
for review and recommendations of the Councilmembers. He
said he would suggest that we bring in a facilitator at a
meeting in May or June, after which the Council would set
some direction for Staff as far as services, merging
departments and other recommendations. He said he would
also need to know long term revenue projections in order to
make any decision regarding a new City Hall or other major
projects and issues.
Anderson said he was not sure how far we were going to go
with the information presented in the packet for tonight's
meeting, and he felt he would need more information before
deciding on such items as a finance commission or budget
committee. He said he would like to see the agenda reflect
the topics to be discussed. Tenpas said he thought we are
having these planning meetings as forums to generate ideas
and they may not have fixed agendas nor be very formal
meetings.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
A. paegele Signs
Ar,derson said the memorandum from Staff with recommendations
brings us back to information covered several years ago. He
said many cities have taken action to remove billboards
along 494. He said he considers the liquor and cigarette
advertisements along the freeway to be a form of visual
pollution. He said he would strongly recommend that the
Council notify MnDOT that the zone allowing such
advertisement should no longer exist. He said he thought
the Council should also recommend removing zones allowing
advertising along 169 and the river bluffs where billboards
exist today.
Jessen said he thought it might be more appropriate to put
this on the agenda for a regular meeting. Anderson said he
brought it up because it was in the packet.
Tenpas asked if his objection was to the type of advertising
or to any advertising. Anderson said he objected both to
I
City Council Meeting 10 February 26, 1991
the type of advertising on the billboards and to any
advertising in areas that we have tried hard to preserve.
Harris said this is a revisit to an existing issue and noted
that a few years ago the Council decided that as the
licenses expired we would have the billboards removed. She
said she thought it did warrant discussion at a regular
meeting.
Tenpas asked if it would be possible to provide some written
historical information on the subject of billboards. A
discussion followed regarding previous agreements made on
billboards and the current status of those agreements.
Enger suggested that the discussion be set up as a closed
session with the City Attorney in order to cover the legal
aspects of the problem.
B. D.F.I. Contribution to Southwest Corridor Coalition
Pidcock reported that B.F.I. contributed $1,000 to the
Southwest Corridor Coalition and that they are willing to
have one of their officers serve on the Coalition's Board of
Directors.
C. Date for Joint Presentation to City Council and School Board
Jullie said the speaker will be available on March 18.
He said the School Board has their meeting that night so
they would have to leave by 7:45 PM. A discussion followed
regarding optional dates and times. Tenpas said he thought
it was important to set a date and stick with it. The
meeting was set for 6:30 PM on March 18.
v• allIMLEOZNI
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the
meeting at 9:20 PM. Motion carried unanimously.
'11'2C\
TIME:
LOCATION:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
EDEN _ERAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
7:30 PM Tuesday, March 19, 1991
City Hall Council Chambers,
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris,
Patricia Pidcock and H. Martin Jessen
City Manager, Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning
Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works
Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Present: Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean
Harris, H. Martin Jessen, Patricia Pidcock
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the agenda.
Jullie requested that Item X.B.1, Discussion of Special City Council
Meeting Dates, be added to the agenda. Pidcock requested that Item
X.A.2., Letter from John Lee be added.
Agenda approved as amended 5-0.
II. MINUTES
A. city Council Meeting of March 1991.
MOTION
Harris, moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Minutes of the
City Council Meeting held Tuesday, March 5, 1991.
Pidcock requested a correction on Page 1 of the Minutes, second
sentence under Item I should read "Pidcock requested the addition
of one item ....". On page 3 of the Minutes, third paragraph, tenth
line should read, "Tenpas said that because the City received benefit
from the ...". Jessen said that on Page 11 of the Minutes, fourth
paragraph, the last line should read "He said monitoring would be
done at least five days a week May through September." Harris
pointed out that the vote to adjourn on Page 15 should be 5-0
instead of 4-0.
Minutes approved as amended 5-0.
City Council Minutes 2 March 19, 1991
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Final Plat Approval of Village Knolls (located at the S,E, Corner of
Homeward Hills Road and Silverwood Drive) Resolution No. 91-60.
C. Resolution No. 91-61 Authorizing Permit Application to MWCC Allow
Connection to MWCC Facilities for the Proposed Village Knolls
Subdivision.
D. Approve Settlement Agreement with the American Fundamentalist
Church for Valley View Road Assessments and Right-of-way
isitjon.
E. Release of Specjal Assessment Agreement 89-04, for the Construction
of Staring ling Lake Parkway and Twin Lakes Crossing Through Aoulder
Pointe,
F. Approve Change Order No. 5 for tylihell/Jksearch Road
Improvements, I.C. 52-051.
G. Approve Change Order No. 2 for Mitchell Road lind Sandy Pointe
Addition Improvements, I.C. 52-156 and 52-201.
H. Approve Change Order No. 2 for Cedar Ridge Storm agy_er
Improvements, I.C. 52-152.
I. Amoco, by Amoco Oil Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 51-91-PUD-
2-91, Zoning District Amendment within the Community Commercial
District; Approval of Developer's Agreement; Adoption of Resolution
91-37, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 5-91-PUD-2-91 and
Ordering Publication; Adoption of Resolution 91-35, Site Plan Review
with the Community Commercial District on 0.8 acres for construction
of a gas station/food shop to be known as Amoco. Location:
southeast corner of Mitchell Road and Martin Drive. (Ordinance 5-
91-PUD-2-91, Zoning District Amendment; Resolution 91-37,
Authorizing Summary and Ordering Publication; Resolution 91-35, Site
Plan Review).
J. Outside Storage and Display by City of Eden Prairie. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance 3-91, amending City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.03,
Subdivision 3.J.1. and 2., and by adding a new 4., to clarify
regulations pertaining to outside storage and display in Industrial
and Commercial Districts; Resolution 91-30, Authorizing Summary and
Ordering Publication of Ordinance 3-91. (Ordinance 3-91, Outside
Storage; Resolution 91-30, Authorizing Summary and Ordering
Publication).
City Council Minutes 3 March 19, 1991
K. Village Knolls, by Argus Development. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 21-
90, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning District on
8.7 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement; Adoption of Resolution
91-70, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 21-90 and Ordering
Publication; 23 single family lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for
a residential development. Location: East of Homeward Hills Road at
Silverwood Drive. (Ordinance 21-90, Zoning District Amendment;
Resolution 91-70, Authorizing Summary and Ordering Publication/.
L. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans & Specs for
Bluffs East 8th, Storm Sewer Improvements, I.C. 52-223 Resolution
No. 91-67.
M. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans & Specs Lor
Bluffs East 9th, Street and Utility Improvements, I.C. 52-224
Resolution No. 91-69.
N. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans & Specs for
Cedar Ridge Estates 2nd Addition, Street and Utility Improvements,
I.C. 52-225 Resolution No. 91-68.
0. A Commendation for Eden Prairie High School Girls Gymnastics Team.
P. Authoriza.tion for Hepatitis-B Vaccinations.
Q. A_pprove Plans and _S_p_egitication and Order for licijAf Eden Hills
Utility and Street Improvements, I.C. 52-212 Resolution No. 91-71.
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Consent Calendar.
On Item 0. A Commendation for Eden Prairie High School Girls
Gymnastics Team, Pidcock volunteered to make this presentation to
the coach and the team.
Motion approved 5-0.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications, I.C.
52-203 (Street and Utility Improvements goSti_i_r gin Lane and Ridge
Road) Resolution No. 91-62.
Jullie said official notice for the public hearing was properly
published in the Eden Prairie News and a copy of the feasibility
report was mailed to the property owners involved in the project.
There also had been a neighborhood informational meeting held to
review the proposed improvements.
City Council Minutes 4 March 19, 1991
Alan Gray, City Engineer, explained the project by the use of maps
and charts. He said the estimated assessment to each property in
the project area was $7,792 for the street improvements; $3,047 for
the water mains, and $3,270 for the sewer, for a total of $14,109. He
also pointed out if parcels had potential to be divided into two or
more units, those properties would be assessed more than others.
However, the extra assessments would not be levied until
development actually took place. He said the assessment for the
street improvements would be levied in the fall of 1991. If a
property had a working well and septic system, the assessments for
the sewer and water would be levied at the time of hook-up or in
1997 at the latest. Other costs to be paid to the City for hooking
up to the system would be approximately $1700. Connection costs
which would be paid to a plumbing contractor would range from
$1500-$3,000.
He said the tentative schedule for the project would be to open bids
on June 17, 1991, award the contract on June 18, 1991, with the
contractor proceeding immediately after that date. A special
assessment hearing would be held in September 1991, with final
completion scheduled for July 1992.
Bill Gloede, 9141 West Staring Lane, spoke in favor of the project
with a reservation about the storm sewer. He said he would like the
City to find an alternative to draining both sides of the road on to
his property. Gray said that it was possible there would be a storm
sewer installed to the west in the Sunrise area and possibly an
outlet could be developed at that location.
Yvonne Hargens, 9060 West Staring Lane, spoke in favor of the
project. However, she was concerned about being assessed for three
lots as there were no plans to develop the lots. Dietz said that
because of the way the law was written, all possible assessments had
to be included at the time the project was approved. They could be
removed at a later date, but not added. This was the reason for
showing these assessments.
Dan Lindholm, 9271 E. Staring Lane, spoke against the water and
sewer portion of the project. He said he did not need the
improvements because he had a working well and septic system. He
also suggested a tar road in the area would be sufficient.
LeRoy Heitz, 9281 E. Staring Lane, said he was opposed to the
project on the basis of costs. He did not believe the costs would
benefit the property or the City.
Ron Ostman, 15080 Ridge Road, spoke in opposition to the project
because he had had no difficulty with his present septic and water
systems.
City Council Minutes 5 March 19, 1991
Olina Floro, 9148 E. Staring Lane, spoke in opposition to t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
project. She said she did not believe she would be able t
o
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
the costs in the future, and added that her water and sept
i
c
s
y
s
t
e
m
were working sufficiently.
Pat Hartell, 9140 W. Staring Lane, spoke in opposition t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
She said her property had good well and septic systems
a
n
d
believed the gravel road was adequate. She believed th
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
were too few people being served for the money involve
d
,
a
n
d
encouraged the Council to wait before installing the impr
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Mike Brown, 9021 W. Staring Lane, spoke in favor of th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
H
e
said he believed it was time for the improvements to be
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
n
d
believed the costs would be higher in the future.
Wendell Owens, 9041 E. Staring Lane, spoke in favor of t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
He said he believed a better road was needed because w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
in the area.
Pat Bower, a resident of Chanhassen who owns one lot i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
area at 9150 E. Staring Lane, said he was concerned about
attempting to sell the lot with the improvement project p
e
n
d
i
n
g
.
H
e
said the assessments were a negative for selling the pro
p
e
r
t
y
b
u
t
h
e
also saw a benefit in the improvements.
Gayle Olson, 9051 E. Staring Lane, said he believed the project was necessary and stressed the need for fire protection in th
e
a
r
e
a
.
H
e
was concerned about this because of the road deterioratio
n
.
Linda Krepsbach, 9080 E. Staring Lane, said she was in f
a
v
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
project.
Steve Herbst, 9040 E. Staring Lane, said he was basically
o
p
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
the project, but would like to see a petition stating who
w
a
s
i
n
favor of the project and who was against it. He suggeste
d
p
u
t
t
i
n
g
blacktop on the road instead of the entire street improv
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
H
e
said would be willing to favor the majority decision.
Ray Campbell, 9081 E. Staring Lane, asked about the ti
m
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
f
o
r
paying the assessments. Dietz explained the assessmen
t
f
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
improvements would be paid over 20 years. If he prope
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
did not connect to City utilities, the utility assessments
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
levied in 1997 for a period of 15 years. He also pointed
o
u
t
t
h
a
t
principal and interest payments would go down over the
y
e
a
r
s
because simple interest on the unpaid balance was charg
e
d
.
Dean Olson, 14980 Ridge Road, spoke in opposition to the
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
because he had a working well and septic system and bel
i
e
v
e
d
C
i
t
y
utilities were unnecessary. Also, he did not see a need f
o
r
a
n
improved road.
City Council Minutes 6 March 19, 1991
Carl Hartell, 9140 W. Staring Lane, pointed out that this was basically
a tax increase and could become $40,000 with interest by the time it
was paid. He also said that the balance must be paid at the time of
the sale of the property, which could be detrimental to a sale.
Roy Jaszczak, 15081 Ridge Road, said he was opposed to the project.
Kristi Olson, 14980 Ridge Road, said she was opposed to the project
because her plans were to sell the property in two years and this
assessment would mean loss of money to her.
Letters were also received from the following citizens: Douglas L.
and Judith I. Olsen, 9030 W. Staring Lane in opposition to the
project; Roger and Jeanene Bloom, 9190 W. Staring Lane in opposition
to the project; Steve Pederson, 9150 E. Staring Lane in favor of the
project; and Jerome Johnson, 15131 Ridge Road in favor of the
project.
There were no further comments from the audience.
Harris said she believed the question on the project was when it
would be done. She said it would ultimately be done.
Pidcock said she was concerned with the health and safety issues in
the neighborhood without the improvements.
Anderson said he believed the project was necessary because of the
health and safety issues with septic tanks.
Jessen said he believed the improvements were reasonable at this
time.
MOTION
Fidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to close the public hearing and
adopt Resolution No. 91-62.
Harris said she was persuaded to vote for the project at this time
by the health and safety issue. Tenpas said he believed the project
was inevitable but would favor waiting on the project. For this
reason he would vote no on the project.
Motion approved 4-1 with Tenpas voting Nay.
B. Cub Foods. Request of Super Valu Stores, Inc. for Zoning District
Change from R1-22 and PUB to C-Reg-Ser on 9.81 acres with
variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Site Plan Review
on 9.81 acres; Adoption of Resolution 91-39, Preliminary Plat of 11.57
acres into 1 lot, outlot and road right-of-way for construction of a
73,000 square-foot building to be known as Cub Foods. Location:
Northwest corner of 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive, south of
City Council Minutes 7 March 19, 1991
Leona Road. (Resolution 91-39, Preliminary Plat; Ordinance 6-91,
Zoning District Change.) Continued from February 19, 1991.
Jullie said official notice for the public hearing was published in the
February 7, 1991 issue of Eden Prairie News and mailed to 26
property owners in the project area.
Pat Groeper, representing Super Valu Stores, Inc., presented the
details of the project with the use of maps and drawings. She
explained that the store would face the west. The plan was for 444
parking places and the building, including the loading dock, would
be 73,000 square feet. She said the proponent was seeking a
variance from the City Code to allow a building that covered a Base
Area Ratio of 2.37% as compared to the City Code of 2%. The
proponent was also seeking a variance on signage and was
requesting 493 square feet of signage compared to 325 feet of
signage allowed by City Code. Another variance requested was for a
front-yard setback in order to accommodate the enclosed docks in
the back of the building. A variance was also requested to permit
an impervious surface area on the site plan because of the shoreline
management policy. A variance from the standard 30% would be
needed.
Enger said staff had been working with the proposal for over a year
and gave a brief history of the project. There had been
controversy over the extension of Leona Road. Currently Cub was
suggesting that it would pay for the extension of the road and for
any assessment costs related to the site. He said the Planning
Commission had recommended approval at its January 28, 1991
meeting on a 5-0 vote subject to staff recommendations of the
January 25, 1991 staff report. He said the variances requested,
except for the sign variance, had been precipitated by the response
to the enclosure of the loading dock.
Lambert sand the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources
Commission reviewed the proposal at its February 5, 1991 meeting
and recommended approval on a 4-0 vote.
Harris asked Enger if the potential conflict with Highway 494
improvements had been resolved. Enger said that the project would
not be in conflict with the highway plans.
Pidcock asked if there would be problems with the trucks turning
around in the area. Deitz replied that the turning radius was
adequate.
Gary Gandrud, of Faegre and Benson Law Firm, representing
Minnesota Protective Life, said that his client was concerned about
traffic patterns in the area, and about the extra traffic which would
be generated by the new Cub Foods store. He encouraged Council to
City Council Minutes 8 March 19, 1991
delay the project until a traffic study had been done and the traffic
problems addressed.
James O'Neill, 4401 Eastwood Road, Minnetonka, property manager and
leasing agent for Minnesota Protective Life, said because of the
dangerous traffic patterns in the area Minnesota Protective Life had
three problems with its building: (1) Tenant retention; (2) Attracting
prospective tenants; (3) Employee turnover. He said the problems
were caused by the traffic problems with a dangerous intersection.
He encouraged the City to work with the State to resolve the
problem.
Mike Cochran, representing Minnesota Protective Life, said his
concern was retention of company employees. He said ease of access
was very important to employees and he was concerned that the
extra traffic generated by the project would make the situation
worse. He encouraged proper traffic studies be done for this area.
Tenpas requested an update on the situation from Dietz. Dietz said
the City expected to meet with MnDOT on the situation in early April.
He said that it was a technical problem with the spacing between
Leona Road and 78th Street because MnDOT required larger spacing
for a traffic signal than that which existed. MnDOT favored a signal
at 78th Street rather than at Leona Road because of the spacing. He
said he believed the project plans would help improve access for
Minnesota Protective Life and the total area.
Enger said the traffic study referred to in the staff report was a
study commissioned by the City on May 3, 1990, when the Cub
proposal was first made to the City. The traffic study was done on
a higher square footage at that time, and a new study had not been
commissioned because the traffic count went down by 1,000 trips a
day with the present project. The study showed that only 10% of
the trips would go out Leona Road to Highway 169. He said that he
believed that if there were another way out, people would take it,
and that was what the proposed road system was planned to do.
Jullie said he had a meeting set up with MnDOT for April 8, 1991 in
an attempt to resolve the situation. In the meantime, the City would
do further study of the traffic situation.
Tenpas assured the representatives of Minnesota Protective Life that
the City would aggressively pursue correction of the situation with
MnDOT and the City would keep Minnesota Protective Life informed of
the progress.
Sidney Pauly, 17450 W. 78th Street, said other projects had been
turned down at this site in the past because of traffic problems.
She said because it was a unique site with views of several lakes,
she would prefer an office or apartment building on the site. She
pointed out the traffic generated by an office building or an
City Council Minutes 9 March 19, 1991
apartment building would not be as great as that generated by a
grocery store.
Bill Barth, representing Prairie Presbyterian Church, said the Church
was concerned about traffic and encouraged Council to find a
solution. He requested that the Church be informed of the progress
of the plans.
Peter Beck, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, representing ITT Hartford,
owner of the Prairie Lakes Business Park, said the company was
concerned that provision had not been made for drainage of the site.
Hartford had been contacted by City staff about the possibility of
drainage on Lot 1, Block 1, of the business park. He said the issue
was whether or not drainage on to the Hartford site would adversely
affect the development potential of the balance of the business park.
He said Hartford would like to see a feasibility study so its
engineers could investigate the situation.
There were no further comments from the audience.
Anderson said he was concerned about the drainage situation and
how it would affect Anderson Lake. He said he was impressed with
the plans the proponent had presented but questioned whether it
was the best use of the site.
Pidcock said she would like more information on the traffic and
suggested continuing the issue until that information could be
obtained.
Jessen said he believed the best use of the site would be an office
building. However, because it was unlikely that an office building
would be proposed for the site after the office building boom of the
1980's, he would approve the Cub store because of the excellent plan
Super Valu had presented.
Harris said she was more concerned about the traffic generated by
the project. However, she agreed with Jessen that it was unlikely
that an office building would be built on the site. She said she
would vote in favor of the project.
Tenpas said he liked the plan presented by the proponent and
wished to encourage economic development in the community. He also
said he believed the people of the community would benefit from
another grocery store in the City. He expressed concern about the
traffic problems and said he would like a disposition on the traffic
signal issue before second reading. Tenpas suggested someone from
the Council and the Police Department meet with the State about
getting a light at Leona Road.
City Council Minutes 10 March 19, 1991
MOTI_QN
Pidcock moved to close the public hearing and approve first reading
of Ordinance No. 6-91 for Rezoning. Seconded by Harris. Motion
approved 4-1 with Anderson voting nay.
MOTION
Pidcock moved to adopt Resolution No. 91-39 for Preliminary Plat
Approval, to direct staff to prepare a Development Agreement
incorporating Commission and staff recommendations, and that Council
receive a plan for the traffic situation before second reading.
Seconded by Harris. Motion approved 4-1 with Anderson voting nay.
C. Timber Lake Drive Townhomes. Request of the Pemtom Company for
Zoning District Amendment within the RM-2.5 Zoning District on 2.11
acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Site
Plan Review on 2.11 acres for construction of 16 townhouse units in
4 buildings to be known as Timber Lake Drive Townhomes. Location:
Northeast corner of Timber Lake Drive and Island Road. (Ordinance
8-91, Zoning District Amendment).
Jtiilie said notice for this public hearing was properly published and
mailed regarding this project.
Dan Herbst, representing the Pemtom Company, reviewed the project
plans. He said the project had received favorable response from the
neighborhood, City staff, and Board of Appeals. There were four
undeveloped sites in the project area and the proposal was for
sixteen homes, four on each site, to be built.
Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its
January 28, 1991 meeting and recommended approval on a 4-0-1 vote,
with one abstention, subject to staff recommendations of January 25,
1991.
Jane Egge, 7912 Timber Lake Drive, said she was concerned that one
of the proposed buildings would block the view to the lake from her
home. She said she had originally paid a premium on her unit for a
view of the lake and she was concerned that her property value
could be lowered by the loss of this view. She was also concerned
that the new buildings would be designed differently with different
outside materials so the new design would not be compatible with the
older units. She said she believed that the sixteen new units would
create more traffic congestion in the area.
Mark Weber, 7966 Timber Lake Drive, said he had attended the
Planning Commission meeting when the project was reviewed. There
had been discussion about changing the location of the building so
City Council Minutes 11 March 19, 1991
as not to block the lake view, and that the design of the new
buildings be compatible with the existing buildings. He pointed out
that these issues had not been mentioned in Pemtom's presentation to
Council.
Herbst said plans had always shown a building to be placed in this
location. The plans had been changed to accommodate the view of
the lake for existing units, but there would still be some obstruction
with the addition of the new building. He said some design changes
had been made to accommodate the concerns of the Board of
Directors of the Association. He said the Board of Directors had
instructed Pemtom to use maintenance-free siding.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION
Harris moved to close the public hearing, approve Ordinance No. 8-91
for Rezoning, and direct the staff to prepare development agreement
incorporating Commission and staff recommendations. Seconded by
Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0.
D. Fairview Medical Health Clinic d Eden Prairie. Request by Fairview
Hospital and Healthcare Services for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment from Industrial to Office on 7.3 Acres; Adoption of
Resolution 91-58, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on
17.4 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural and 1-2 to Office on 2.9
acres; Site Plan Review on 2.9 acres for construction of a 15,200
square-foot medical health care clinic to be known as Fairview
medical Health Clinic of Eden Prairie. Location: East of Prairie
Center Drive and south of Technology Drive. (Resolution 91-58,
Resolution 91-66, PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance 9-91, Zoning
District Change).
Jitllie said that notice for this public hearing had been properly
published and mailed to property owners in the project area.
Ray Piiarainen, Assistant Property Director for Fairview Hospital and
Healthcare Services, said the request was for approval of a 15,200
square-foot single-story medical office building on Lot One, Block
Two of the DataServ Business Center. He said Fairview was
attempting to accommodate a number of issues including access to
Prairie Center Drive. He said Fairview had looked at ways to
accommodate temporary access until the intersection was completed in
1993. He said August 15, 1991 was the target opening date for the
building and the primary care clinic.
Enger said the Planning Commission at its February 25, 1991, had
recommended approval of the project on 5-0-1 abstention vote
subject to recommendations of the January 25, 1991 staff report.
City Council Minutes 12 March 19, 1991
MOTION
At 11:00 PM Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to extend the
meeting 30 minutes. Motion approved 5-0.
Jim Hawkins, representing DataServ, Inc., said DataServ objected t
o
the cross-access easements. He said that DataServ had not been
informed of this situation by the City. He said he believed the
rerouting of traffic through the DataServ property would jeopardi
z
e
the safety of DataServ employees. He believed Fairview should
develop its own entry way and requested that the Council continue
the item for two weeks to allow DataServ more time to discuss the
issue with Opus, the owner of the property.
Enger said the City did not believe two separate accesses would be
a
good plan. He also pointed out that DataServ had only a right-in,
right-out access, and Fairview had offered to pay for the temporary
median cut until the State provided the permanent cut. He said he
believed Fairview would enhance the Opus/DataServ site in this way
and that the Planning Department had always dealt with Opus.
Jessen noted that DataServ's concerns were tenant/landlord issues i
t
had with Opus, and were not within the purview of the City
regarding the Fairview proposal.
Bob Worthington, representing Opus Corporation, said he believed
i
t
was essential to receive a decision from Council as soon as possibl
e
as the proponent wished to begin construction April 1. He it was
not the intention of Opus to pass any costs for improvements on to
DataServ in order to accommodate Fairview.
There were no further comments from the audience.
MOTION
Harris moved to close the public hearing and adopt Resolution No.
91-66, PUD Concept Amendment. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion
approved 5-0
MOTION
Harris moved adoption of Resolution 91-66 amending the
Comprehensive Guide Plan. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved
5-0.
MOTION
Harris moved to approve the first reading of Ordinance 9-91 for
Rezoning. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0.
City Council Minutes 13 March 19, 1991
MOTION
Harris moved to request staff to prepare a development agreement
incorporating Commission and staff recommendations. Seconded by
Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0.
MOTION
Harris moved to grant an early grading permit to the proponent with
the understanding that early grading is done at proponent's risk.
Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0.
V. PAYMENT QE CLAIMS
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve payment of claims.
Payment of claims approved with Anderson, Harris, Pidcock, Jessen and
Tenpas all voting "AYE".
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS COMMISSIONS, & COMMITTEES
A. Public Discussion of Recommendation of City Hail Site Selection
Subcommittee. (Continued to April 2, 1991)
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment to Human Rights & Services Commission (1-year term).
(Continued to April 2, 1991)
Harris said she believed there would be a second opening on this
Commission due to one of the members moving out of state. She
suggested that people who had listed this Commission as either a
first or second choice be contacted about the appointments.
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Couneilatembers
1. Legislation Regarding Suburban Hennepin Regional Park DistricA
(Resolution No. 91-72).
Jessen said work had been done to introduce legislation to
eliminate the two appointed positions to the Suburban Hennepin
Regional Park Board of Commissioners. Jessen said he believed
City Council Minutes 14 March 19, 1991
Council should adopt this resolution to express its support of this
proposed legislation.
MOTION
Pidcock moved adoption of Resolution No. 91-72 in support of
eliminating the two appointed positions to the Suburban Hennepin
Regional Park Board of Commissioners. Seconded by Anderson.
Motion approved 5-0.
2. Letter from John Lee Regarding Hotel Accommodations
Pidcock asked if there was a reason why this person who was
nineteen years of age was not able to get hotel accommodations in
Eden Prairie. Jullie said this was hotel policy and was not an
issue for the City. Pidcock asked staff to follow up with Mr. Lee
regarding his letter.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Discussion of Special City Council Meeting Dates
Jullie said Tuesday, March 26, 1991 had been scheduled for review
of the Capital Improvements Program. However, Anderson and
Lambert would not be able to be present for the meeting.
Therefore, Aline suggested this topic be continued to Tuesday,
April 9, 1991 at 6:00 PM. Jullie said the City Hall discussion could
occur at the same time.
Jullie also suggested a special meeting on Tuesday, April 2, 1991
at 7:00 PM to review candidates for Human Rights and Services
Commission.
Council agreed to these dates.
C. Director of Larks., Recreation & Natural Resources
1. Policy on Past Due Rental of Facilities.
Lambert requested Council to approve the policy as presented on
past due rental of facilities.
MOTION
Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Policy on
Past Due Rental of Facilities as proposed. Seconded by Anderson.
Motion approved 5-0.
City Council Minutes 15 March 19, 1991
D. Report of Pulgic Works Director
1. Approve Layout Plan for CSAH .§2 from CSAH 60 to Oa41 I.C.
52-173, Resolution No. 91-63.
Dietz explained the plan with the use of a map. He said City staff
was in agreement with the layout plan as proposed.
MOTION
Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve Layout Plan for
CSAFi 62 from CSAH 60 to CSAH4, I.C. 52-173, Resolution No. 91-63.
Motion approved 5-0.
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION
Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjourn at 11:40 PM. Motion
approved 5-0.
6 6 1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
April 2, 1991
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
Association for Retarded Citizens
Beeler Construction, Inc.
EON Construction, Inc.
Lindstrom Cleaning & Construction
M L Construction
Mary's Construction, Inc.
Merrimac Construction Company
T. J. Olson Construction
Poly-Tex, Inc.
Unipro Construction Company
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
PLUMBING
AAA Plumbing by Newstrom, Inc.
Accent Service Plumbing
Gilbert Mechanical
Hillman Plumbing & Heating
Marsh Plumbing & Heating
McQuillan Bros.
Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors
P J Plumbing & Heating
Richfield Plumbing Company
Steinkraus Plumbing, Inc.
Swanson & Schiager Plumbing
Valley Plumbing Company
GAS FITTER
Blizzard Air, Inc.
C. O. Carlson Air Conditioning
Hillman Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
J. K. Heating Company
Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning
Lamb Mechanical
Metropolitan Mechancial Contractors
Neil Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Palen/Kimball Company
Richfield Plumbing Company
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Snell Mechanical, Inc.
Steinkraus Plumbing, Inc.
Valley Plumbing Company
HEATING & VENTILATING
C. O. CarlsOn Air Conditioning
Fisher-Bjork Sheetmteal Company, Inc.
Hillman Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
J. K. Heating Company
Judkins Heating & Air Conditioning
Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors
Neil Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Northwest Sheet Metal Company
P J Plumbing & Heating
Palen/Kimball Company
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Snell Mechanical, Inc.
Thompson Air, Inc.
Bruce Bren Homes, Inc.
Daystar Builders
Thomas Daughenbaugh Const.
Eden Construction
Edgework Builders, Inc.
Terry Elfering Construction
Freudenberg Construction
Goodwin Builders, Inc.
Grant Home Remodelers
Heritage Builders
Jab-Ushot
Jyland Homes, Inc.
Kraemer & Sons
Linert Construction
David McKenna Construction
Panelcraft of Minnesota
Reus-Bottema Construction
Ken Roelofs Construction
Steiner & Koppelman, Inc.
T & 0 Homes, Inc.
I & J Improvements
Kevin Thompson Homes, Inc.
WATER SOFTENER
Minnesota Water Treatment
ON SALE WINE & STRONG BEER
The Gui-Lin Restaurant
(
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
page two
COMMERCIAL KENNEL
Kingdale Kennels
TYPE B FOOD
Blue Bell Ice Cream
FOOD VEHICLE
Blue Bell Ice Cream
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
Pat Solie
Licensing
RELEASE OF LAND
This Release of Land is executed by the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal
corporation ("City"), and is dated as of April 2, 1991.
FACTS
1. A certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments ("Agreement") dated December 5.
1984, was executed by and between the City, M.J.P. Partners. A Minnesota Partnership
and Hestia Homes. Inc.. A Minnesota Corporation which Agreement was filed as
Document No. 1619766 with the Hennepin County Recorder on December 31. 1984.
The Agreement related to the property described therein as:
Block 1, Lots 1 and 7; Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4; Block 3, Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11, and 12; and Outlots B, C, D, Prairie Knoll, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
2. The special assessments contemplated by the Agreement have been levied and the time
for appeal has expired.
3. To evidence the fact that the special assessments have been levied and the time for appeal
has expired, the City is executing this Release of Land.
THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereby
releases the Property described above from all obligations and conditions set forth in the
Agreement Regarding Special Assessments dated December 5. 1984 filed with the Hennepin
County Recorder as Document No. 1619766 on December 31. 1984. This Release of Land shall
not release or discharge the Property from the lien of any special assessments levied by the City
pursuant to the Agreement.
- Page 2 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie has executed the foregoing
instrument.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
A Municipal Corporation
BY:
Douglas B. Tenpas
Its Mayor
BY:
Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
- Page 3 -
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
1991, by Douglas B. Tenpas and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden
Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of said
corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
#7-- RELEASE.0
RFR/01-14-88
(Miller Parcel)
AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of April, 1991, by and between the
City of Eden Prairie (The City) and the Metropolitan Council of the State of Minnesota (The
Council).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The City has acquired fee title to Lot 5 Block 2, Eden School Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, The Council has contributed funds toward the acquisition of said real
property pursuant to its Loan Program and Loan Agreement No. L-89-3
with The City as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 473.167; and
WHEREAS, Said Loan Program was established to provide for the acquisition of
homestead property within a proposed trunk highway right-of-way or
project from owners who suffer a hardship because of their inability to
sell such property because of its location.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the grant heretofore made by The Council and in
consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
No sale, lease mortgage or other conveyance, nor the creation of any easement, restriction or
other encumbrance against the above-described real property shall be valid for any purpose
unless the written approval of the Metropolitan Council or its successors is duly filed and
recorded at the time of the filing and recording of the instrument to which such approval
pertains, nor shall said real property be used for any purpose except Trunk Highway 212 unless
the Metropolitan Council or its successors shall consent to such other use or uses by instrument
in writing duly filed and recorded and designating the nature, extent and duration of the use for
which such consent is given. Month to month rental of the property until needed for trunk
highway purposes shall be allowed without a filed/recorded approval.
This Agreement and Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by the Metropolitan Council or its
successors or by any citizen residing within the metropolitan area as then defined by appropriate
action in the courts of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed in
their respective names all as of the date first above written.
1VIETROPOL1TAN COUNCIL
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
By
Sharon Klumpp, Executive Director
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
Approved as to form
By
Assistant Counsel Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
(Otterlei Parcel)
AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of April, 1991, by and between the
City of Eden Prairie (The City) and the Metropolitan Council of the State of Minnesota (The
Council).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The City has acquired fee title to Lot 3 Block 2, Eden Prairie Industrial
Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, The Council has contributed funds toward the acquisition of said real
property pursuant to its Loan Program and Loan Agreement No. L-89-6
with The City as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 473.167; and
WHEREAS, Said Loan Program was established pursuant to said law to provide for the
acquisition of property within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway
shown on an official map when necessary to avoid imminent conversion
of such property to a use which would jeopardize the property's
availability for highway construction .
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the grant heretofore made by The Council and in
consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
No sale, lease mortgage or other conveyance, nor the creation of any easement, restriction or
other encumbrance against the above-described real property shall be valid for any purpose
unless the written approval of the Metropolitan Council or its successors is duly filed and
recorded at the time of the filing and recording of the instrument to which such approval
pertains, nor shall said real property be used for any purpose except Trunk Highway 212 unless
the Metropolitan Council or its successors shall consent to such other use or uses by instrument
in writing duly filed and recorded and designating the nature, extent and duration of the use for
which such consent is given.
This Agreement and Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by the Metropolitan Council or its
successors or by any citizen residing within the metropolitan area as then defined by appropriate
action in the courts of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed in
their respective names all as of the date first above written.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
By
Sharon Klumpp, Executive Director
Approved as to form
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
By
Assistant Counsel , Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
(Metro Machine Parcel)
AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of April, 1991, by and between the
City of Eden Prairie (The City) and the Metropolitan Council of the State of Minnesota (The
Council).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The City has acquired fee title to Lot 2 Block 2, Eden Prairie Industrial
Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, The Council has contributed funds toward the acquisition of said real
property pursuant to its Loan Program and Loan Agreement No. L-89-7
with The City as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 473.167; and
WHEREAS, Said Loan Program was established pursuant to said law to provide for the
acquisition of property within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway
shown on an official map when necessary to avoid imminent conversion
of such property to a use which would jeopardize the property's
availability for highway construction .
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the grant heretofore made by The Council and in
consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
No sale, lease mortgage or other conveyance, nor the creation of any easement, restriction or
other encumbrance against the above-described real property shall be valid for any purpose
unless the written approval of the Metropolitan Council or its successors is duly filed and
recorded at the time of the filing and recording of the instrument to which such approval
pertains, nor shall said real property be used for any purpose except Trunk Highway 212 unless
the Metropolitan Council or its successors shall consent to such other use or uses by instrument
in writing duly filed and recorded and designating the nature, extent and duration of the use for
which such consent is given.
This Agreement and Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by the Metropolitan Council or its
successors or by any citizen residing within the metropolitan area as then defined by appropriate
action in the courts of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed in
their respective names all as of the date first above written.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
By
Sharon Klumpp, Executive Director
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
Approved as to form
By
Assistant Counsel
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
(Gilk Parcel)
AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 2nd day of April, 1991, by and between the
City of Eden Prairie (The City) and the Metropolitan Council of the State of Minnesota (The
Council).
WITNESSE'TII:
WHEREAS, The City has acquired fee title to Outlot B, Red Rock Shores Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, The Council has contributed funds toward the acquisition of said real
property pursuant to its Loan Program and Loan Agreement No. L-89-7
with The City as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 473.167; and
WHEREAS, Said Loan Program was established pursuant to said law to provide for the
acquisition of property within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway
shown on an official map when necessary to avoid imminent conversion
of such property to a use which would jeopardize the property's
availability for highway construction .
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the grant heretofore made by The Council and in
consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
No sale, lease mortgage or other conveyance, nor the creation of any easement, restriction or
other encumbrance against the above-described real property shall be valid for any purpose
unless the written approval of the Metropolitan Council or its successors is duly filed and
recorded at the time of the filing and recording of the instrument to which such approval
pertains, nor shall said real property be used for any purpose except Trunk Highway 212 unless
the Metropolitan Council or its successors shall consent to such other use or uses by instrument
in writing duly filed and recorded and designating the nature, extent and duration of the use for
which such consent is given.
This Agreement and Restrictive Covenant may be enforced by the Metropolitan Council or its
successors or by any citizen residing within the metropolitan area as then defined by appropriate
action in the courts of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed in
their respective names all as of the date first above written.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By
By
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
Sharon Klumpp, Executive Director
Approved as to form
By
Assistant Counsel Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
,
Timber Bluffs
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 50-88-PUD-14-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN
LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
CITY CODE CHAFFER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District
and be placed in the R1-22 District (hereinafter ''PUD-14-88-R1-22).
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
o reement dated as of April 2,1991, entered into between Bell Oaks Company, a Minnesota limited partnership
and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"), The Developer's Agreement contains the
terms and conditions of PUD-14-88-R1-22 are hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD-14-88-R1-22 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City.
B. PUD-14-88-R1-22 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment
within its own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are
contained in PUD-14-88-R1-22 are justified by the design of the development described therein.
D. PUD-14-88-R1-22 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction,
marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent
unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the
Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the PUD-14-88-R1-22 District, and the legal descriptions of
land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are
mded accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
_ay Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby
adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of
November, 1988, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council
of said City on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk Douglas B. Temps, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1991.
P[7.11.i1tig:TO R1-22 1,1 part uf u6tlut A. Sell Oaks first ecottion, according to the Piet on ill. in Ike SifiCe of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesute, and that part Of Govero,,rot Lot 1, Section 36, Township 116 North. Range 27, Lost of the 9th pr:pp,pal Kerlden described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Outlot A: thence South 64 degrees 27 minutes 26 seconds East. .assumed bearing, along the northeasterly line of said Outlot A a distance of 205.00 feet to the point of beg 'flflih91 thence South OS degrees 36 minutes 39 seconds East 256.27 feet: thence South 67 degrees 26 minutes 24 seconds East 410.39 feet; thence South 71 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds East 311.57 feet; thence North 16 degrees 22 minutes 32 seconds East 231.15 feet to a point on the North line of said Government Lot 1; thence Korth 88 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds Nest 48.04 feet to the most easterly corner of said Outlet A: thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Outlot A 727.61 feet to the point of beginning. REZOINC 10 91-44 That part of Outlot A, Bell Oaks First Addition, according to the plat on file In 'the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 36, Township 116 North, Range 22. West of the 5th Principal Meriden described IS follows: eeginning at the northwest corner of said Outlet A: thence South 64 degrees 27 minutes 76 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northeasterly line of said Outlet A a distance of 205.00 feet: thence South OS degrees 36 minutes 39 seconds East 256.27 feet; thence South 67 degrees 26 minutes 24 Seconds East 410.39 feet; thence South 71 degrees 30 minutes 36 seconds Last 711.57 feet: thence North 16 degrees 22 minutes 72 seconds east 271.15 feet to • point of the North line of said Government Lot I: thence South 09 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds East 310.00 feet to 4 point on a line 1.21U feet East of and parallel with the west line of said Governrent Lot 1; thence South 0 degree% 7 minutes 28 SeCOndS West, parallel with said Rest line, a distance of 770.14 feet; thence North 78 degrees 06 minutes 41 seconds West 592.73 feet; thence North 64 degrees 19 minutes 12 seconds west 330.00 feet; thence North 72 degrees 47 minutes 50 Seconds West 347.32 feet to the west line of said Government Lot 1; thence North 0 degrees C7 minutes 28 seconds East 426.00 feet to the northwest corner of said GoTernrwnt lot 1; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 19 seconds East, along the west line Of said Outiot A, a distance Of 360.30 feet to the point Of beginning. 124g,(1._ CONCEPT 6 P.U.D. OISTRICT REVIEW That part of Outlot A, Bell Oaks First Addition, according to the plat on file in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 36. Township 116 North, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Outlot A; thence South 64 degrees 22 minutes 26 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northeasterly line of said Outlot As distance of 664.57 feet; thence South 70 degrees 02 minutes 39 seconds East 278.00 feet; thence South 88 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds East 358.04 feet; to a point on • line 1.210 feet East of and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 1; thence South 0 degrees 7 minutes 28 seconds West, parallel with said West line, a distance of 770.14 feet; thence North 78 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds West 592.23 feet; thence North 64 degrees 19 minutes 12 seconds Weft 330.00 feet; thence Worth 72 degrees 47 minutes 50 Seeoads West 347.32 feet to the west line of said Government Let 1; thence Meth 0 degrees 07 minuteS 28 seconds East 426.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Government Lot I; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 19 seconds East, along the west line of said Outlot A, a distance of 360.30 feet to the point of beginning. Preliminary Plat Government That part ofalmt I. Section 36. Township 116 march. Range 22, West Gi lee 5th Principal Meriden described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot I; thence South to the Minnesota River; thence .Easterly along said River to a point 815 feet East tif the West line of said Lot 1; thence North parallel to said West line of Lot 1 to a point 91 feet South of the North line Of said Lot 1; thence East 395 feet; thence North parallel to !he West line Of Said Lot 1 to the North line thereof; thence West to beginning; and Oulot A, Bell Oaks First Addition. according to the plat on file in the Office the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Ninnesota„
Timber Bluffs
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of • 1991, by
Bell Oaks Company, a Minnesota limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter re-
ferred to as "City":
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development District
Review on approximately 19 acres, with waivers, and with underlying zoning district
changes from Rural to PUD-14-R1-22 on approximately 4 acres and from Rural to PUD-
14-R1-44 on approximately 15 acres, and Preliminary Plat of approximately 19 acres
into 14 single family lots, two outlots, and road right-of-way, all said 19 acres
situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as
"the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #50-88-PUD-
14-88, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and
maintenance of said property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated , 1988, reviewed and approved
by the City Council on November 15, 1988, and attached hereto as
Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or maintain
the property in any other respect or manner than provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's approval of plans for the private street, sanitary sewer,
water, storm sewer, and erosion control for the property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
4. Concurrent with and as part of the final plat for the property,
Developer agrees to provide to the City a scenic easement, along
the southern, or rear, lot lines of the lots within Block 2, as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Said scenic easement shall be represented as a "utility easement" on
the final plat and also shall be represented in written form as
depicted in Exhibit D, attached hereto, and made a part hereof.
Developer agrees to file said written scenic easement on the
property with Hennepin County and provide proof of filing of said
written scenic easement to the City prior to City release of any
building permits on the property.
5. Concurrent with and as part of the final plat for the property,
Developer agrees to dedicate to the City a 150 ft. wide outlot for
trail purposes adjacent to the Minnesota River along the south
boundary of the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
6. Developer shall notify the City and the Watershed District 48 hours
prior to any grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the property.
7. Prior to issuance of any grading permit upon the property, Developer
shall submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the Director's
approval of, a tree replacement plan for 423 caliper inches of
trees on the property.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, said tree replacement plan,
in accordance with the Tree Preservation Policy of the City,
attached hereto as Exhibit E, and made a part hereof.
8. Developer agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate
protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where
grading is not to occur, and to obtain City approval of said
measures. Developer agrees that said protective measures shall
include, but not be limited to:
A. Grading shall be confined to that area of the property
within the construction limits.
B. Snow fencing shall be placed at the construction limits
within the wooded areas of the property prior to any grading
upon the property.
C. City shall perform an on-site inspection of said protective
measures on the property by the City. Developer shall
contact City for said inspection. Developer agrees that
defects in materials and workmanship in the implementation
of said measures shall then be determined by the City.
D. Defects in materials or workmanship, if any, shall be
corrected by Developer. Developer agrees to call City for
reinspection of the implementation measures, and to obtain
approval by the City prior to issuance of the grading permit
by the City. Approval of materials and workmanship may be
subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the
time of acceptance.
9. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, Developer shall submit to
the Director of Planning and obtain the Director's approval of a
tree inventory of those trees within 25 ft. outside of the
construction area, which are not planned to be removed by
construction on the property as approved by City, indicating the
size, type, and location of all trees twelve (12) inches in
diameter, or greater, at a level 4.5 feet above ground level.
10. If any such trees are removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the
construction area, Developer agrees that prior to issuance of any
building permit for the property, Developer shall:
A. Submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain the
Director's approval of a reforestation plan for all trees
removed, damaged, or destroyed outside of the construction
area. Said plan shall indicate that the trees shall be
replaced by similar tree species and that the trees used for
reforestation shall be no less than three inches in
diameter. The amount of trees to be replaced shall be
determined by the Director of Planning, using a diameter
inch basis, according to a cross sectional cut through the
diameter of a tree as measured 4.5 feet above the ground.
B. Prepare and submit to the Director of Planning, and obtain
the Director's approval of a written estimate of the costs
of the reforestation work to be completed.
C. Submit a bond, or letter of credit, guaranteeing completion
of all reforestation work as approved by the Director of
Planning. Developer agrees that the amount of the bond, or
letter of credit, shall be 150% of the approved estimated
cost of implementation of all reforestation work and shall
be in such form and contain such other provisions and terms
as may be required by the Director of Planning.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer shall
implement, or cause to be implemented, those improvements listed
above in said plans, as approved by the Director of Planning.
11. Prior to issuance of any permit for building on the property,
Developer agrees to submit to the City Police Department, and to
obtain the Department's approval of plans
f
o
r
the security gate and access to the private road on the prope
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
R
i
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
.
Developer agrees that the method of m
a
n
u
a
l
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
constructed into the security gate mechan
i
s
m
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
emergency access to the property.
12. As part of Planned Unit Development #14-8
8
,
C
i
t
y
h
e
r
e
b
y
g
r
a
n
t
s
t
h
e
following waivers for Lots 1-8, Block 2, i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
,
a
l
l
a
s
d
e
p
i
c
t
e
d
in Exhibit B, attached hereto:
From the requirement of Chapter 12 to allo
w
f
o
r
a
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
r
o
a
d
t
o
service said lots, instead of a public roa
d
.
Timber Bluffs
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-86
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE 50-88-PUD-14-88 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 50-88-PUD-14-88 was adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 50-88-PUD-14-88, which is
attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly
informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no
smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minn. State. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by
any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy
of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 50-88-PUD-14-88 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days
after said publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Timber Bluffs
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 50-88-PUD-14-88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING
CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN
ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND IN EACH
DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Suni=zi This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located in southeast Eden Prairie,
south of Riverview Road, west of County Road #18 and east of Huntington Drive, from the
Rural District to the PUD-14-88-RI-44 District subject to the terms and conditions of a
developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description
of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1991.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-85
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following
improvements:
I.C. 52-189 (Braxton Street and Utility Improvements)
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant
to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the
assistance of H.T.P.O., and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to
the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as
to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 2, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council
to consider making the followng described improvement(s):
(General Location)
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Storm Sewer
X Street Paving
Other
Street Address of Other
Legal Description of
Property to be Served
Braxton Drive from County Road 1 north to Fairfield
Names of Petitioners
(Must Be Property Owners)
Cedar Ridge Elementary School Independent School District No. 272,
Eden Prairie
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project No.
Council Consideration
/
/
Harry A. Rogemra, Fee 0w4ner
9100 Eden Prairie Road
Eden Prairie 55344
fe44W. Johnson///.P./Project Mgr
for JAB-USHOT Purchaser
under Contract for Deed
300 S. Hwy 169, #870
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
February 25, 1991
Honorable Mayor Doug Tenpas
Members of Eden Prairie City Council
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Attn: Mr. Alan Gray, City Engineer
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, as fee owner and contract for deed holder for
the land preliminary platted as Cedar Ridge Second Addition (see
attached legal description), do hereby petition the City of Eden Prairie
to proceed with the residential collector street, curb, storm sewer,
watermain and sanitary sewer improvements abutting the western edge of
Cedar Ridge Second Addition. We understand and agree that the cost of
the improvements will be specially assessed against the abutting
properties on a front foot basis in accordance with the City's special
assessment policies. We further agree that all right of access necessary
to construct the improvements will be granted by the undersigned.
Please give this petition your prompt and favorable consideration
so that the improvement can be constructed this summer.
Respecfully submitted,
Legal Desoribtion
That part of the West half of the North
w
e
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
southeast Quarter lying North of the North line of County Road No. 1, excepting therefrom that part described
a
s
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
e
intersection of the centerline of County Roa
d
N
o
.
1
a
n
d
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
line of said Southeast Quarter; thence North
e
r
l
y
,
a
l
o
n
g
s
a
i
d
W
e
s
t
line, a distance of 165.00 feet; thence East
e
r
l
y
,
a
t
r
i
g
h
t
a
n
g
l
e
s
to said West line, a distance of 165.00 feet;
t
h
e
n
c
e
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
l
y
,
a
t
right angles, to the centerline of said Count
y
R
o
a
d
N
o
.
1
;
t
h
e
n
c
e
Southwesterly, along said centerline, to the
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
.
That part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter lying South of the North 11
5
2
.
2
7
f
e
e
t
.
That part of the East 403.40 feet of the Sout
h
e
a
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Northwest Quarter lying South of the North 115
2
.
4
9
f
e
e
t
,
E
X
C
E
P
T
t
h
e
West 40.00 feet thereof.
That part of the East 403.40 feet of the Nort
h
e
a
s
t
Q
u
a
r
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Southwest Quarter lying North of the North line
o
f
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
o
a
d
N
o
.
1, EXCEPT the West 40.00 feet thereof.
All in Section 20, Township 116 North, Ran
g
e
2
2
W
e
s
t
,
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
County, Minnesota.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-78
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 5th day of March, 1991, fixed the 2nd
day of April, 1991, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements:
I.C. 52-205 (Sunrise Circle Street & Utility Improvements)
WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council Hearing through two weekly publications
of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 2nd day of April, 1991, at
which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered.
2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is
hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvements, with the assistance of R.C.M., consulting engineers.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 2, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
3
Fairfield 1991 Amendment
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION # 91-64
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FAIRFIELD 1991 AMENDMENT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT' AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL
FAIRFIELD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Fairfield 1991 Amendment development is considered a proper
amendment to the overall Fairfield Planned Unit Development Concept; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request
of Centex Real Estate Corporation for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall
Fairfield Planned Unit Development Concept for the Fairfield 1991 Amendment development
and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 2, 1991;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Fairfield 1991 Amendment development PUD Concept Amendment, being
in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,
is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the
overall Fairfield Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application
materials for the Fairfield 1991 Amendment.
3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning
Commission dated March 11, 1991.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of April, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #91-65
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF FAIRFIELD 1991 AMENDMENT
FOR CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Fairfield 1991 Amendment for Centex Real Estate Corporation,
dated March 22, 1991, consisting of 23 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is
found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting
ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Planning Commission
March 11, 1991
Page Two
IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. FAIRFIELD 1991 AMENDMENT (91-7-PUD-Z-P) by Centex
Real Estate Corporation. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment on 118.2 acres,
Planned Unit Development District Review with
waivers on 23 acres, Zoning District Amendment
within the R1-9.5 Zoning District on 23 acres,
Preliminary Plat of 23 acres into 61 single family
lots and road right of way to be known as Fairfield
1991 Amendment. Location: north of Stanley Trail,
north of Candlewood Parkway.
Dan Blake, representing the proponent, presented
the plans for a 61 single family lot subdivision on
approximately 23 acres. Blake believed that the
plan was very straight forward and asked for
questions.
Uram asked Blake if the proponent concurred with
the recommendations in the Staff Report. Blake
replied that the proponent concurred with all items
with the exception of the tree replacement
calculations which would be addressed by Staff.
Uram reported that approximately 916 caliper inches
of trees had already been planted throughout the
original 1988 PUD, and the City currently had a
bond for 214 caliper inches of trees. Uram added
that based on this information, Items lA and 3A
should be deleted from the recommendations.
Sandstad asked for details on the buffering plan.
Blake replied that a berm would be constructed for
the length of Scenic Heights Road similar to the
one on County Road 4. Blake added that extra depth
had been provided on the lots adjacent to Scenic
Heights road to accommodate the berm.
Hawkins asked if the berm existed at this time.
Blake replied no. Hawkins asked how erosion would
be prevented. Blake replied that erosion should
not be an issue because of the distance between the
two roads and the grades. Hawkins then asked how
water would be provided to the berm. Blake replied
that the individual homeowners would be responsible
for maintenance of the major portion of the berm.
Planning Commission
March 11, 1991 Page Three
Hawkins asked Staff what the city's position was
related to residential irrigation of berming. Uram
replied that an irrigation ordinance had been
vetoed by the City, and Blake was correct that the
majority of the maintenance would be the
responsibility of the individual homeowner.
Hawkins asked Blake to address the natural area on
the property. Blake replied there was a wetland
area which was left in its natural state. Hawkins
stated that it appeared that some of the lots would
be in this lower area and questioned if high water
calculations had been done. Blake replied that the
calculations had been studied.
Hallett asked if there would be a homeowners
association which would be responsible for berm
maintenance. Uram replied no, it would be
individual homeowners. Hallett believed that this
area could look terrible without an irrigation
system. Blake replied that the landscaping would
be done with sod, and that Centex would maintain
the berm while the lots were being sold.
Hallett asked why the plan had been changed from
what was proposed two years ago. Blake replied
that the present market proved that this type of
home was selling well at this time. Blake added
that currently the larger lots were not selling as
fast as previously scheduled.
Norman asked if there would be a homeowners
association. Blake replied no.
Sandstad stated that covenants and maintenance
agreements were in place to assure the maintenance
of the property. Blake added that this covered
maintenance on the lots. Uram stated that
covenants and maintenance agreements were enforced
by the property owners.
Hawkins asked if all utilities were currently
installed. Blake replied yes.
Norman asked if the City could recommend that a
homeowners association be established for this
subdivision. Uram replied that in this case, the
City would not recommend an association.
Planning Commission
March 11, 1991 Page Four
Hawkins asked if the sewer easement would cross any
of the proposed lots. Blake replied that the
easement ran north and south and followed the
street. He added that only two lots would be
affected.
MOTION 1:
Hallett moved, seconded by Bauer to close the
public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0.
MOTION 2:
Hallett moved, seconded by Kardell to recommend to
the City Council approval of the request of Centex
Real Estate Corporation for Planned Unit
Development Concept Amendment to the overall
Fairfield PUD on 118.2 acres for development of 61
single family units to be known as the Fairfield
1991 Amendment, based on plans dated March 6, 1991,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated March 8, 1991, with the exclusion of items lA
and 3A from the Staff Report. Motion carried 6-0-
0.
MOTION 3:
Hallett moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to
the City Council approval of the request of Centex
Real Estate Corporation for Planned Unit
Development District Review, with waivers, and
Zoning District Amendment within the R1-9.5 Zoning
District on 23 acres, for Fairfield 1991 Amendment,
for development of 61 single family units, based on
plans dated March 6, 1991, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 8,
1991, with the exclusion of items lA and 3A from
the Staff Report. Motion carried 6-0-0.
MOTION 4:
Hallett moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to
the City Council approval of the request of Centex
Real Estate Corporation for Preliminary Plat of 23
acres into 61 single family lots, one outlot, and
road right-of-way, to be known as Fairfield 1991
Planning Commission
March 11, 1991 Page Four
Amendment, based on plans dated March 6, 1991,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report
dated March 8, 1991, with the exclusion of items lA
and 3A from the Staff Report. Motion carried 6-0-
0.
OAP.,
-VMS
,/,'
er—L 3-4
PROPOSED SITE
n••n
R1-13.5 .
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Planner
TIIROUGII: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: March 8, 1991
SUBJECT: Fairfield PUD Amendment
LOCATION: North of Stanley Trail, North of Candlewood Parkway, West of County
Road 4
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
Centex Real Estate Corporation
I. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 118.2 acres.
2. Planned Unit District Review with waivers on 25.5 acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment within the R1-9.5 Zoning District on
25.5 acres.
4. Preliminary
Plat of 25.5
acres into 62
single family
lots, one outlot
and road right
of way.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
KENDM ENT
This 25.5 acre site is part of the 150 acre,
367 single family unit, Fairfield Planned
Unit Development approved in 1988. This
portion of the PUD was approved for 75 RI-
9.5 cluster lots at a density of 2.94 units per
acre. Centex is requesting a PUD
Amendment to change from the approved
cluster lot concept to standard R1-9.5
zoning. This change would result in a
reduction of units from 75 to 62 and a net
density of 2.43 units per acre.
- AREA LOCATION MAP
RI-9.5 ZONING AMENDMENT
This 25.5 acre site was zoned R1-9.5 in 1988. The revised preliminary plat which depicts 62
lots meets the requirements of the R1-9.5 Zoning District.
TRANSITION
Impacts on adjoining land uses were addressed in detail in the 1988 Planned Unit Development.
Approval of the PUD was predicated upon providing two access points to the undeveloped
property north and east of this site. It was also required that the land abutting this property
should have a density which does not exceed 2.5 units per acre. The purpose of the access and
density requirements were so the land area to the northeast could develop consistent with the
Comprehensive Guide Plan designation of Low Density Residential with an internal road access.
The preliminary plat is consistent with these recommendations.
GRADING
The change in the preliminary plat does not change the overall approved grading plan. Site
grading is minimal. There will be some tree loss within this phase around the pending area.
Overall tree loss was reviewed with the 1988 PUD at a loss of approximately 27%. The tree
replacement plan was for 1130 inches to be spread out over all phases within the PUD. A total
of 440 inches have been planted within the first phases of the PUD which means that 690 total
inches remain to be planted. There is an overall concept plan for the 690 inches, however, the
plan must be developed in more detail prior to the issuance of a grading permit. A bond will
be required for that portion of the trees which will be replaced on 62 lots within this phase.
SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
The 1988 PUD approval required a sidewalk and trail to be constructed along either side of
Braxton Road. It was also required that an internal sidewalk connection be made along an
internal loop road. Since the PUD Amendment proposes a change in the internal road network,
there should be a 5' wide concrete sidewalk along the longest interior loop road which connects
to the property to the northeast.
SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD, DELL ROAD. HIGHWAY 212
The preliminary plat has been developed which provides for enough right of way for Highway
212 and Scenic Heights Road to be built to the north of the property. Since some of the lots will
abut directly onto Scenic Heights Road, a buffer zone should be provided. Berming and
plantings consistent with what has been planted along County Road 1 should be proposed along
Scenic Heights Road. This plan should be provided prior to review by the City Council.
Scenic Heights Road and Dell Road are part of a feasibility study which has recently received
approval by the City Council. Phase I of the feasibility study would be the initial construction
of Dell Road south of Highway 5. This will begin in the summer of 1991. Phase II of this
project would be the east/west road connection or Scenic Heights Road. This is not scheduled to begin construction until 1992.
ARCHITECTUR L DIVERSITY
This project must continue with the approved architectural diversity plan for t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
P
U
D
.
The architectural diversity plan for the R1-9.5 area required that no two units
b
e
a
l
i
k
e
s
i
d
e
b
y
side, opposite or diagonally across from each other.
MUM
Sewer, water and storm sewer are immediately available adjacent to the site
w
i
t
h
i
n
a
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
road system.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning staff would recommend approval of the request for a Planned
U
n
i
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Concept Amendment, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated March 8, 1991, subject to the
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
contained in the staff report dated March 6, 1991 and subject to the following
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
1. Prior to review by the City Council, proponent shall:
A. Provide a detailed tree replacement plan for this phase.
B. Provide a buffer plan along the south side of Scenic Heights Road.
C. Modify the preliminary plat to depict a sidewalk and trail along Braxton Drive
a
n
d
a sidewalk along the longest interior loop road in the project.
2. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall:
A. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by t
h
e
Watershed District.
B. Provide detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for revi
e
w
by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Provide a detailed tree replacement plan and security.
B. Stake the proposed construction limits with a snow fence, provide erosion co
n
t
r
o
l
and notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advan
c
e
o
f
grading.
4. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall:
A. Submit an overall architectural diversity plan for this phase.
B. Submit plans for review by the Fire Marshall.
5. Concurrent with site construction, proponent shall construct sidewalks and trails along the
roadway systems within the project.
'10)
( mots Department of Transport( 11
Metropolitan District
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
March 13, 1991 Reply to
Telephone No 593-8753
Mr. Chris Enger
Director of Planning
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Dr.
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
In Reply Refer to: Tli 212
C.S. 2762
Fairfield PUD Amendment
SW Quadrant New TH 212/CSAH 4
Dear Mr. Enger:
We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further
development with consideration of the following comments:
Although construction of proposed New TN 212 is programmed to begin in
1993, continuing coordination by the developer with the city and Mn/DOT
Predesign section is strongly recommended.
The city and developer should be aware that Mn/DOT will not provide any
type of noise abatement for new development adjacent to the existing
highway. We suggest every effort be made in design of the proposed
development to minimize any impact this might have on it.
Drainage permits from the Riley - Purgatory. Bluff Creek Watershed District
and the Corp of Engineers may be required.
If you have any questions in regard to our review of the plat please call me at 593-8753.
Sincerely,
Tim Henkel
Transportation Planner
cc: Steve Keefe - Metro Council
Les Weigelt - Hennepin Co. DOT
Mike Reiter - Hennepin Co. Surveyor
CekitaP /
...999- MINNESOTA
1990
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 91-73
Vacation of Right-of-Way for Bristol Court
and Part of Chesholm Lane and Drainage and
Utility Easements in Block 1 and
Part of Block 2, Bluffs West
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a certain right-of-way and drainage and utility
easements described therein as follows:
The following described areas located within Bluffs West as platted and recorded in the
offices of the County Recorder and Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota:
Right-of-way for Bristol Court (also known as Bluffs West Boulevard encompassed
within Block 1) and Chesholm, Lane east of Homeward Hills Road (also known as Bluffs
West Boulevard); and
Drainage and utility easements in Block I and within Lots 1 through 14, Block 2 as
platted within said Bluffs West.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 2, 1991 after due notice was published and
posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way and easements are not necessary
and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
I. Said right-of-way and easements as above described are hereby vacated
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance
with M.S.A. 412.851
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 2, 1991.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
loRT
Sims awl 01111111km Nur
t 7.,
N
\ • e't
.1;t1
11,1 .1 3../
.1
/.
51
ry../..y.se.11: 3z 00, it of SOO it of WA Sh4tO
Li J.1.11 .04 ,7, MOH.
,„
I .i •F .1 1/..N. 3ooll .f 1 33 1g 5.,../A 800 ft of polo, 5 d
' 514 of Sec 16
X
1E; 6 r OF WAY le Eas VAicAriro
_ - E A457001 Ts -r;B ItAGAtilo
VA& 91-04
(2) bonds,l ,.noth unrar ollwwwwe ecotoled en>i4 1 Alq /01k/ ow wworlfh wtOwd toltfoonww, fiooel fowl onlryf ) nkinvlen, orw /be www,nww/ ) r--...:.. 'Ac----- 7 --I --ti..-- --- 7;**.fir .:., , 2? 2_1,94__ 300 00, •n•n nn•• --..---'.\:::2 '2.1°- 1: . ' :: ...::12 ' I no, A t J--.7';' .... , I") 14; lint 0^ int 5:1 crirc X, gyp 116, 476. few pLA-7-7-71.)e, VAc '-ii-o4 F— \foie. A rgo AgeAs VILLAGE WNOLLS low' !or o,'Ar Ca..A (.97r 5( fn..6on 2C, Ti ..tr4 fs?.. w 200 yst SCALE 01 Far 001/N4CI 00 UTILITY' EASEMENTS PPE 5P7wni Two5' : keel 9.1(V a
VAC: 88-01
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-74
VACATION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR
PART OF ONTARIO BOULEVARD
(also known as Westgate Boulevard)
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easement described therein as follows:
That part of Westgate Boulevard, also known as Ontario Boulevard, as platted within Westgate Addition on file and
of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest property corner of Lot 27, Block 7, Westgate Addition; thence Northerly on the
east right-of-way line of said boulevard 183.77 feet; thence deflecting to the left 75 degrees 41 minutes 28
seconds to the west right-of-way line of said boulevard; thence southerly on said west right-of-way line to
the South line of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9; thence easterly on said South line to the
point of beginning and there terminating.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 2, 1991 after due notice was published and posted as required by
law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easement has no interest to the public,
therefore, should be vacated.
WHEREAS, public and private utilities have been installed and are presently operated and maintained within the
right-of-way, an easement allowng governmental and utility company personnel and equipment to enter upon the
vacated right-of-way to maintain or construct additional facilities needs to be retained.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said right-of-way as above described is hereby vacated, subject to a permanent drainage and utility
easement being retained over the entire parcel.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 2, 1991
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, City Clerk
,
:11.61:M= s:- T !,••• 44 *A! ..) —1..1Efi TE tathAra 1 IS.VAREIODIER RD. I JARtp ES ST, 61111.1111111 11111111111 BUr Nornimml..1 I limns . Valt 1-7-11..011 1 wESTGATE RiGar oF WAY 6E- VrACA-re'D Nxv r.; Aov wpm. 44, • mittli Tim LAPS WE: T N!:SS CER 11/ 1111,11•10,11/41 44$4#44.74r •Ab, kko -
T.E. FULLER RD. LOW PT. 14.47.67 • P0 .47 - 52139.1-L.-- 0 5205 LOW PT. •1 1 jet.9,' 111 9\4L-4==Q 1 -ro 50 VcAflD • • 5279 111P, &T. 138:EWAY 0: • 1170 5201 2 1170 n 3 t/ 0 5277 192 rciTe —,; 5272—' 0424 cap. I FLt2r.iElFnTito. 12.74.1 ,L1ct; 5299 5293 5304 5303 5305 • I '1" C _ -5:2 76Ni_ MoRT VAG _6-01 VEN-NRE LANE' (NORTH FRONTAGE AD) 0019 0 50 20 86 113
APRIL 2.1991
13787 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
13788 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE
1 3789 CHANHASSEN KITCHEN & BATH
790 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
3791 CITY OF RICHFIELD
13792 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
13793 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC
13794 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE
13795 STATE FIRE SCHOOL-STC
13796 TEENERS THEATRICAL
13797 TEENERS THEATRICAL
13798 LIL RED EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY
13799 FRED ZIEBOL
13800 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN
13801 MAWP
13802 AT&T
13803 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
13804 DANA GIBBS
13805 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP
13806 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
13807 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
13808 U S WEST CELLULAR INC
13809 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS
13810 MN ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSN
13811 STATE TREASURER STATE OF MN
13812 STATE TREASURER
"1813 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC
814 NCSAWWA
13815 NCSAWWA
13816 SANDRA WALTERS
13817 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
13818 TARGET CENTER
13819 ATOM
13820 MN STATE AQUATIC CONFERENCE
13821 DUN & BRADSTREET CORP FOUNDATION
13822 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION
13823 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER
13824 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
13825 BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING INC
13826 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 0272
13827 PREFERRED VENDING
13828 SANCO INC
13829 SUPERIOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS INC
J830 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
15119617
PAYROLL 3/8/91
PAYROLL 3/8/91
FORMICA-COMMUNITY CENTER
FEBRUARY 91 SALES TAX
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS
CONFERENCE-FORESTRY DEPT
CONFERENCE-SEWER DEFT
CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT
COSTUME RENTAL-SOCIAL PROGRAM
DEPOSIT-COSTUME RENTAL-SOCIAL PROGRAM
-POSTAGE-INVITATIONS FOR AWARDS BANQUET-
CITY COUNCIL
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEFT
-SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT FEE-SPECIAL EVENTS
PROGRAM
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE-PACKET DELIVERY
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEFT
LICENSE APPLICATION FEE-WATER DEPT
LICENSE-SEWER DEPT
CONFERENCE-WATER DEFT
CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT
CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES
TICKETS-DISNEY ON ICE-SENIOR PROGRAMS
CONFERENCE-POLICE DEFT
CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER
CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
CONFERENCE-PLANNING DEPT
CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT
SANDER RENTAL-CO”NUNITY CENTER
-SERVICE-HOMEWARD HILLS RD/MITCHELL RD &
-RESEARCH RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS & UTILITY
-CONST/MITCHELL RD EXTENSION & SANDY POINTE
-ADDITION/HIGHWAY 5 FRONTAGE RD/DELEGARD
PROPERTY SANITARY SEWER
-WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER/BUS
-SERVICE-SPORTS & OUTDOOR PROGRAM/ROOM
RENTAL-ADULT PROGRAMS
-14 COFFEEMAKERS/POTWARMER/40 GLASS
COFFEE DECANTERS FOR CITY BUILDINGS
-CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/
COMMUNITY CENTER/VACUUM-$400-COMMUNITY CTR
-REPAIRED DAMAGE DUE TO SEWER & WATER
PROJECT-SUMMIT & MEADOWVALE DR
-ACETYLENE/HELIUM-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/
FIRE DEPT
13926.50
70098.85
29.00
16689.23
41.00
52.00
180.00
1584.50
595.00
67.50
75.00
52.80
60.00
115.00
115.00
81.11
48.10
81.00
63.00
4783.78
12159.77
122.48
4995.49
100.00
45.00
15.00
360.00
650.00
80.00
14.00
28.00
1725.00
30.00
190.00
165.00
30.00
500.00
21.36
13424.73
690.32
4610.16
845.2z
1482.4f
1938.f
13831 MINNESOTA ENERGY COUNCIL
13832 ROBERT LAMBERT
'1833 HUNTER CONFERENCE
334 HOLIDAY INN-MADISON WEST
13835 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT
13836 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
13837 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
13838 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER
13839 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457
13840 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
13841 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG
13842 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC
13843 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION
13844 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN OF MN
13845 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
13846 VOID OUT CHECK
13847 UNITED WAY
13848 RICK ATHERTON
13849 CYNTHIA CHRISTENSEN
13850 CAROL DEAN
13851 rouc GRANT
13852 JUDD GRIER
13853 DAVE HEADLA
13854 CINDY NESS
13855 GERALD RHOADES
13856 HEATHER SCHWIEGER
13857 BARBARA WILKUS
13858 PETTY CASH
859 CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER
,860 MPLS INSTITUTE OF ARTS
13861 J L SHIELY COMPANY
13862 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE
13863 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY
13864 AL MAY ENTERPRISE
13865 SENSIBLE LAND COALITION
13866 R E MOONEY & ASSOCIATES INC
13867 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS
13868 EAGLE WINE CO
13869 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
13870 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
13871 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
13872 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
13873 PRIOR WINE CO
13874 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO
13875 THE WINE COMPANY
13876 WORLD CLASS WINES
13877 HOPKINS POSTMASTER
13878 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
13879 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS
13880 AAOS
13881 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING
13882 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH
13883 AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
-CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT/
FACILITIES DEPT
MARCH 91 EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT
CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION
CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
PAYROLL 3/8/91
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
PAYROLL 3/8/91
PAYROLL 3/8/91
MARCH 91 UNION DUES
MARCH 91 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
PAYROLL 3/8/91
MARCH 91 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM
APRIL 91 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
PAYROLL 3/8/91
REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
REFUND-KARATE LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-KARATE LESSONS
REFUND-KARATE LESSONS
REFUND-KARATE LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY CLASS
REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS
CHANGE FUND-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/FEES PAID
ADULT PROGRAM/FEES PAID
GRAVEL-STREET DEFT
MARCH 91 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM
MARCH 91 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
CANINE CAR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
DUES-PLANNING DEPT
PAINT-WATER DEPT
ENVELOPES-CITY HALL
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING
HEATER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE
TRANSMISSION REBUILT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT
DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
PAGER BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT
1ST AID MANUALS-FIRE DEPT
210.00
200.00
400.00
153.30
50.42
155.00
6044.00
194.76
2113.72
32.00
1105.00
17642.65
25.00
29156.00
171.00
0.00
2.25
4.00
26.00
17.00
26.00
26.00
26.00
17.00
20.00
19.00
16.00
50.00
94.69
60.00
696.55
2714.73
2770.40
100.00
50.00
650.76
335.53
1101.59
16388.75
32295.91
150.90
12562.46
3509.73
17054.41
43.32
71.00
514.52
40.85
644.95
112.25
161.00
77.5(
105.0C
3043190
c) h
APRIL 2.1991
13884 AMERICAN RED CROSS LIFEGUARD TRAINING COURSE-POOL LESSONS
13885 KARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC BARRICADE TAPE-STREET DEPT
186 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY COPY PAPER-CITY HALL
( 37 DON ANDERSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
1i888 ANDERSONS GARDEN EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
13889 ANDON INC HELIUM TANK & VALVE RENTAL-SOCIAL PROGRAM
13890 AQUA SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO INC 8 COLD WATER & ICE RESCUE SUITS-FIRE DEPT
13891 ASSOC P/S COMMUNICATIONS OFFICERS DUES-POLICE DEFT
13892 AWARDS INC RIBBON CUTTING SCISSORS-CITY COUNCIL
13893 B & S TOOLS -DRILL BIT/SOCKETS/IMPACT DRIVER/PLIERS/
-WRENCH/MULTIMETER/CLIPSAIAGNET/SANDING
BLOCKS/TAPE-EQUIPMENT MAINT/PARK MAINT
13894 S H BARTLETT CO INC VALVE ASSEMBLIES/FITTINGS-COMMUNITY CENTER
13895 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -SIGNALS/BRAKE PAD/BATTERIES-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
13896 BELL ATLANTIC TRICON LEASING CORP -APRIL 91 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE
DEPT
13897 BERGIN AUTO BODY INC REPAIR & PAINT VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT MAINT
13898 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
13899 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON FEBRUARY 91 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE
13900 LOIS BOETTCHER MINUTES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
13901 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO CANDY FOR EASTER EGG HUNT-SOCIAL PROGRAM
13902 BOYD OIL DISTRIBUTING GAS ADDITIVE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
13903 LEE BRANDT HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
13904 BROADWAY AWARDS PLAQUES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
13905 BRO-TEX INC PAPER TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
13906 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE
13907 NATHAN BUCK VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
' 108 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-LIQUOR STORE
39 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
13910 BUSINESS MACHINES SALES & SERVICE TYPEWRITER REPAIR-SENIOR CENTER
13911 BUSINESS WEEK SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT
13912 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC 2 PRINTERS-FINANCE DEPT
13913 CEI JACKHAMMER-STREET MAINTENANCE
13914 JAMES CLARK MARCH 91 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
13915 MARK CLARK POLO PLASTICS -YOUTH ID BRACELETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS
PROGRAM
13916 CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC CV SHAFT-WATER DEPT
13917 COMMUNICATIONS WORLD OF MPLS WEST TELEPHONE REPAIR-POLICE DEPT
13918 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC MARCH 91 INSURANCE CONSULTANT SERVICE
13919 BARBARA CROSS CONFERENCE-PARK PLANNING DEPT
13920 CROW MARKING INC DESK SIGNS-CITY HALL/COMMISSION MEMBERS
13921 CULLIGAN - METRO SERVICE
13922 CUMMINS DIESEL SALES INC -SEALS/GASKETS/CLAMPS/THERMOSTATS/TURBO
INDUCTION FAN -$499 -EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
13923 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC SCREWS/NUTS & BOLTS/KEYS-EQUIPMENT MAINT
13924 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/FACILITIES
DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER
13925 DAN & DANS MINUTEMAN PRESS -PRINTING-CERTIFICATION LETTERS-ORGANIZED
ATHLETICS PROGRAM/FITNESS CLASS
13926 CRAIG W DAWSON EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION
13927 DECATHLON ATHLETIC CLUB EXPENSES-MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION
13928 DEN CON LANDFILL INC -FEBRUARY 91 WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINT/
PARK MAINTENANCE
29 HERB DEROMA SERVICE-MARTIN LUTHER KING JR PROGRAM
80.00
283.00
652.97
80.00
23.50
64.00
2272.80
50.00
49.07
419.45
194.10
300.09
358.68
1452.00
525.21
430.00
47.40
471.50
198.00
283.00
174.00
154.69
249.85
337.50
113.42
60.00
54.00
27.50
1051.40
155.59
200.00
178.84
133.00
86.00
560.00
35.00
175.25
29.90
511.40
311.03
304.59
156.83
62.25
8.65
57.50
408.00
1 ,11
1383096
APRIL 2.1991
13930 DRUMMOND AMERICAN CORP
13931 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
332 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE
13933 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
13934 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT
13935 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL FOOD SERVICE
13936 DEB EDLUND
13937 JOHN H EKLUND
13938 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
13939 CHRIS ENGER
13940 DOUGLAS ERNST
13941 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC
13942 F M SERVICE & EQUIPMENT
13943 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN
13944 FLOYD SECURITY
13945 FMC CORPORATION
13946 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
13947 JOHN FRAME
13948 LYNDELL F FREY
13949 GENERAL MACHINING INC
13950 GETTING TO KNOW YOU
13951 BENNETT GIBBS
13952 GNERER WELDING INC
13953 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
13954 W W GRAINGER INC
13955 BRADLEY GRAY
13956 GREAT AMERICAN MARINE
13957 LEROY GUBA
13958 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
13959 HARMON GLASS
13960 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO
13961 CHRISTINE HEIL
13962 LAURIE MELLING
13963 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
13964 HENN CTY PUBLIC RECORDS
13965 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
13966 D C HEY COMPANY INC
13967 STEVE HIGLEY
13968 HOFFERS INC
13969 CHERYL HOGE
13970 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC
71 HOME LUMBER
1994888
CHEMICAL SPILL SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT
-FEBRUARY 91 COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-
CITY HALL
WASHER REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-CITYS SHARE OF MUNICIPAL LEGISLATURE
DINNER
REIMBURSEMENT-POP FOR CITY COUNCIL
SERVICE-MARTIN LUTHER KING JR PROGRAM
MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 91 WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT
LINEMAN GLOVES-STREET LIGHTING DEPT
MARCH 91 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT
LICENSE-PARK MAINTENANCE
POSTAGE-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER
PRESSURE WASHER REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT
BOOK-FIRE DEPT
-2ND QUARTER 91 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINT
AGREEMENT-LIQUOR STORE
PIN/SPRING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
MARCH 91 EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
STEEL PLATE-PARK MAINTENANCE
-NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 90/JANUARY & FEBRUARY
91 ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
-BICYCLE MECHANICS INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR CTR
PROGRAM/FEES PAID
-PLOW BLADES/RUBBER SHIELD/MARKERS/PENS/
-PLOW BOLTS/CABLES/4-WAY VALVE-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT
-BARRIER TAPE/POWER TAPE/LAMPS/HACKSAW
BLADES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
INFLATABLE BOAT-FIRE DEPT
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-WIRED 2ND FLOOR OF HOMEWARD HILLS BARN-
PARK MAINTENANCE
WINDSHIELD REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FRONT END LOADER REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
-MICROFICHE-ENGINEERING DEPT/ASSESSING
DEPT/FORESTRY DEFT
FILING FEE-ENGINEERING DEPT/PLANNING DEPT
TRAFFIC TICKET FORMS-POLICE DEPT
-TONNER/DEVELOPER/COPIER MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
PAINT/PAINT THINNER-PARK MAINTENANCE
-SERVICE-SWIMMING AIDE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION
PROGRAM
-FLOAT SWITCH HEAD/HEATER REPAIR/PILOT
LIGHT/GAUGE-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER
-BRACKETS/BOLTS/STUDS/JOIST HANGERS/HAND
-RAILS/LUMBER-HOMEWARD HILLS BARN-PARK
343.96
719.03
66.90
309.27
28.80
2042.00
125.00
750.00
26.75
203.20
6.50
98.76
202.75
33.95
398.00
16.00
365.31
200.00
429.25
20.25
462.00
130.00
830.23
418.00
201.67
533.00
1375.00
113.00
5387.38
70.00
1076.03
144.00
160.75
228.63
308.00
1113.50
307.37
138.00
90.56
103.50
211.53
163.05
14000 AHMAD MCGOWAN
14001 MASTER CRAFT LABELS INC
14002 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
14003 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK
MAINTENANCE
APOGEE COMPUTER SOFWARE-POLICE DEPT 2000.00 SUBSCRIPTION-ADMINISTRATION 457.00 -ROOM RENTAL-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS/POOL 1957.50 LESSONS/MARTIN LUTHER KING JR PROGRAM
RUBBER STAMP/BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT 104.95 BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT 75.00 DUES-ASSESSING DEFT 100.00 DUES-FIRE DEPT 60.00 -VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS 338.50 COORDINATOR/FEES PAID
RADIATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 11.80 BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 232.50 -OFFICE SUPPLIES-SEWER DEPT/WATER DEPT/ 563.41 FIRE DEPT
-2ND QUARTER 91 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 955.00 COMMUNITY CENTER
-FORMICA/LUMBER/DRAWER LOCKS/PLYWOOD/STUDS/ 379.59 -SHELF SUPPORTS/TAPE-CITY HALL/FIRE DEPT/
STREET DEPT
MAGNETIC SCREWDRIVER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23.95 -JACKETS/LETTERING/TABLE TENNIS NET- 111.96 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM
EXPLORERS PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 19.58 EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 12.14 JANUARY 91 LEGAL SERVICE 13202.50 -COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/MATS - 139.45 LIQUOR STORE
-FEBRUARY 91 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 2696.82 LANDFILL
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 508.18 SPRINGBOARD DIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 315.75 TIMBERS-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 50.72 RUST & PAINT REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 687.5C -SWITCHES/3 MAIN SWEEPER BROOMS -$708/10 3037.81 GUTTER BROOMS-$74O-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-APRIL 91 COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1545.0C AGREEMENT/COMPUTER SOFTWARE-POLICE DEPT
BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 18.0C -TYPESETTING FLYERS-RECREATION SUPERVISOR/ 265.0( -HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION/POOL
-LESSONS/FITNESS CLASSES/COMMUNITY CENTER
ADMINISTRATION
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
61.5C JUNIOR BADGES-POLICE DEFT
450.0C OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT
108.5( -FAINT/CONTACT CEMENT/PAINT BRUSHES/HINGES/
189.6: -FAINT TRAYS/HOSE/FITTINGS/RUST REMOVER/
-HOSE CLAMPS-CITY HALL/STREET MAINT/PARK
MAINTENANCE/COMMNITY CENTER
-MARCH 91 SERVICE-MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 13500.0( COMMISSION
-2ND QUARTER 91 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINT 78.0( AGREEMENT-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
13972 ICAT
13973 ICMA
13974 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272
,975 INSTY-PRINTS
13976 INTL ASSN OF ASSESSING OFFICERS
13977 IMO
13978 INTL SOCIETY OF FIRE SVC INSTR
13979 GARY ISAACS
13980 J & R RADIATOR CORP
13981 CHRISTOPHER M JESSEN
13982 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
13983 JOHNSON CONTROLS
13984 JUSTUS LUMBER CO
13985 DAN N KANTAR
13986 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
13987 JOHN LANDERS
13988 ROBERT LM1BERT
13989 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
13990 LEEF BROS INC
13991 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
'992 LIONS TAP
,993 RICHARD LUGEANBEAL
13994 LYMAN LUMBER CO
13995 MAACO AUTO PAINTING
13996 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
13997 MASYS CORPORATION
13998 JEAN MATTIACCI
13999 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS
14004 MESSERLI & KRAMER
14005 METRO ALARM INC
4425724
APRIL 2,1991
14006 METROPOLITAN NAST" cnNTROL COMMIS FEBRUARY 9
1
S
A
C
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
19305.00
14007 VOID OUT CHECK
0.00
, '4008 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS APRIL 91 S
E
W
E
R
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
156146.00
( 009 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO AIR TAILGATE KITS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 468.00
14010 MIDWEST SIREN SERVICE -1991 CIVIL DEFENSE WARNING SIRENS MAINT 920.00
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT-POLICE DEPT
14011 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CTR/ 960.88
POLICE DEPT
14012 MINNCOMM PAGING MARCH 91 PAGER SERVICE-STREET MAINTENANCE 32.19
14013 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY PROTECTIVE CLOTHING-FIRE DEPT 288.00
14014 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 99.30
14015 MN DEPART OF NATURAL RESOURCES FIREARMS SAFETY INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 95.00
14016 MN STATE TREASURER FEBRUARY 91 BUILDING SURCHARGES 2812.40
14017 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 153.00
14018 MINNESOTA TROPHIES PLAQUES-POLICE DEPT 138.14
14019 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 388.49
14020 MUNICIPAL TOY COMPANY INC TOYS-SOCIAL PROGRAM 175.00
14021 R J MUONIO -SERVICE-ELECTRICAL WORK AT 7126 BAKER RD- 1760.00
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
14022 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT T-SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM 2698.46
14023 JANICE NELSON MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL 150.00
14024 JERRY PARNHAM VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 30.00
14025 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC -SPREADER VAL
V
E
/
H
Y
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
I
P
A
N
K
-
E
Q
U
I
R
I
E
N
T
352.44
MAINTENANCE
14026 PEPSI COLA COMPANY -CARBON DIOXIDE TANKS-POOL OPERATIONS- 138.75
COMMUNITY CENTER
14027 PITNEY BOWES INC -COPIER PHOTO DRUM/PRINTPOWDER-RECREATION 460.00
ADMINISTRATION
4028 PITNEY BOWES INC POSTAGE METER RENTAL-POLICE DEFT 114.75
.029 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -REPLACED BALLAST-LIQUOR STORE/INSTALLED 750.05
TEMPORARY FEED FOR AERATOR-PARK MAINT
14030 PREFERRED VENDING COFFEE FILTERS-CITY HALL 14.70
14031 PSO BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE R
E
P
A
I
R
-
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
107.00
14032 R & R SPECIALTIES INC -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/STUDDED TIRE/ 768.60
-OIL FILTERS/SNOW SHIELD/DISTRIBUTOR/
TAIL PIPE-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER
14033 MIKE RAMLER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 160.00
14034 AAGE REFFSGAARD EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 15.0C
14035 SCOTT A REIN -SOFTBALL/VOLLEYBALL/HOCKEY & BROOMBALL 740.0C
OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
14036 RESOURCE RECYCLING SUBSCRIPTION-ADMINISTRATION 92.0C
14037 BARBARA J RICE -SWIMMING AIDE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM/ 87.72
FEES PAID
14038 RONS ICE COMPANY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 105.3E
14039 DALE SCHMIDT EXPENSES-STREET DEPT 15.2(
14040 WILBUR W SCHULTZ -SOFTBALL/VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/ 120.5(
FEES PAID
14041 SEARS CALCULATOR-FINANCE DEPT 54.9E
14042 TOM SEE INC -INSTALLED INSULATION-11995 SUNNYBROOK RD- 560.0(
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
14043 SIGN A RAMA USA -INSTALLED VINYL LETrxHING FOR POLICE 1419.6(
VEHICLES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
14044 STEVEN R SINELL MARCH 91 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEFT
14045 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CTR PRINTING-SENIOR NEWSLETTER-SENIOR PROGRAMS
046 THE SKETCH PAD -TYPESETTING/PRINTING INVITATIONS-CITY
-TYPESETTING/PRINTING-INVITATIONS-CITY
19319195
207.5(
141.0(
146.9:
,
COUNCIL
REFUND-LICENSES
-TEST LIGHT/DOCKET SETS/SCREWDRIVER/
SWITCH/PLIERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FILM/DISTILLED WATER-COMMUNITY CENTER
ADVERTISING-FINANCE DEPT
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE
VEHICLE EMBLEMS-FIRE DEPT
AWARDS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
RECALIBRATE PORTABLE SCALES-POLICE DEPT
SUBSCRIPTION-POLICE DEPT
-BATTERIES/TRAFFIC WANDS/GRILLE & DECK
-LIGHTS/3 VEHICLE PARTITIONS-$844/6 PUSH
-BUMPERS-$504/5 FLASHLIGHTS W CHARGERS-
$500-POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-PRESS PUMP VALVE/SIMULATED SURVEILLANCE
CAMERA-LIQUOR STORE
-CANDY CANES-SOCIAL PROGRAM/FILE CABINET/
CASH BOX/FILES/BASKETBALLS-ORGANIZED
ATHLETICS PROGRAM/VCR-STREET MAINTENANCE
BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-OXYGEN/ARGON GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/
PARK MAINTENANCE
DUES-YOUTH TENNIS PROGRAM
SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT
NUTS & DOLTS-PARK MAINTENANCE
UPHOLSTERED CHAIR CUSHION-FITNESS CENTER
PROPANE CYLINDERS-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CTR
REFUND-MECHANICAL PERMIT
MARCH 91 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING
WELDING SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE
MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL
RECYCLING CONTAINERS-SOLID WASTE MGMT
VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT
LOCKERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MILEAGE-ENGINEERING DEPT
SOLENOID/SPRINGS/ADAPTER-EQUIPMENT MAINT
14047 SMITH HVAC INC
14048 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
( )49 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC
14050 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
14051 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
14052 SPECIALTY SCREENING
14053 SPORTS WORLD USA
14054 STATE OF MINNESOTA
14055 STAR TRIBUNE
14056 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ
14057 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS
14058 TARGET STORES
14059 TOWER ASPHALT INC
14060 BRAD SWANSON
14061 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
14062 U S TENNIS ASSN
14063 U S WATER NEWS
14064 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
14065 THE UPHOLSTERY SHOP
14066 VISION ENERGY
167 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
, )68 KEITH WALL
14069 WELSH COMPANY
14070 WEST WELD SUPPLY
14071 ROBERTA WICK
14072 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE INC
14073 KRISTA M WORRE
14074 JIM ZAIC
14075 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
14076 FRED ZIEBOL
14077 ZIEGLER INC
13501 VOID OUT CHECK
13527 VOID OUT CHECK
13538 VOID OUT CHECK
13610 VOID OUT CHECK
13670 VOID OUT CHECK
13730 VOID OUT CHECK
13757 VOID OUT CHECK
13766 VOID OUT CHECK
30.00
468.78
10.15
9.50
107.16
136.50
15.00
280.00
70.20
2024.52
194.33
344.75
1595.01
289.00
146.90
25.00
44.00
24.00
68.75
126.42
30.50
220.00
3656.85
95.61
175.00
8500.00
180.00
15.00
48.59
107.25
119.12
20.40
1512.93-
14424.73-
1936.86-
633.25
810.74
1482.05
193.86
-185693
$571000.17
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
10 GENERAL
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD
73 WATER FUND
77 SEWER FUND
79 RALF
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND
87 CDBG FUND
88 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE
$571000.17
251729.16
3647.80
65680.27
34965.88
-1660.03
12692.87
176110.23
752.50
10696.07
2567.50
13817.92
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
March 22, 22, 1991
Trail Connection from Welter's 6th Addition
At the March 5th meeting the City Council approved the first reading of the Welter's 6th
Addition, subject to review of possible trail connection alternatives prior to the second reading.
After walking the site with the developer and discussing this issue with adjacent property owners,
City staff recommend the developer be required to construct an 8' wide asphalt trail, constructed
to City specifications, from the sidewalk through Outlot A to a proposed creek crossing. The
estimated length of this trail would be approximately 200'. This would be the permanent trail
location and would eliminate any duplication or need for a parallel trail in the future.
Once there is a demand for a trail connection to Homeward Hills Road, the City would be
required to construct a bridge across the creek and obtain a trail easement across approximately
130' of property owned by Ray Welter.
BL:mdd
wtrail/bob
'1 13
0 City Owned Property Aiding Trail/Sidewalk System . a Proposed Soft Strf ace Nature Trail (future) TO Be Installed by Developer 5' Concrete Sidewalk •• nnnnn 8' Bituminous Trail
Welter's Purgatory Acres 6th Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #7-9I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN
LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE
CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District
and be placed in the R1-13.5 District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from
the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in
each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted
in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
Agreement dated as of April 2, 1991, entered into between Welter's 6th Addition Limited Partnership, a
Minnesota limited partnership, and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to
Developer's Agreement, between J B & D, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated
as of April 2, 1991, which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of
March, 1991, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
ATTEST:
John D. Fran, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
3LISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1991.
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Tract D, except the south 215 feet of the west 202.6 feet thereof,
Registered Land Survey No. 1041, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Welter's Purgatory Acres 6th Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91-82
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE 7-91 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 7-91 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 7-91, which is attached hereto,
is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public
of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no
smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minn. State. sec. 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by
any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy
of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 7-91 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with
proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after said
publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on the 2nd day of April, 1991.
ATTEST:
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
John D. Franc, City Clerk
Welter's Purgatory Acres 6th Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 7-91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING
CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN
ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND IN EACH
DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located north of Welter's Way and
south of Sunnybrook Road, from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms
and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the
full legal description of this property.
Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
1991.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
Welter's Purgatory
Acres 6th Addition
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1991, by WELTER'S 611I
ADDITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as
"Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 10.95
acres, with variances approved by the Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 10.95 acres into seven (7)
single family lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way for Welter's Purgatory Acres 6th Addition, all said 10.95
acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property:"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #7-91, Developer covenants and
agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows:
1. APPROVED PLANS: Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the City
Council approval at the meeting of December 18, 1991, and in conformance with materials
revised and dated , 1991, attached hereto as Exhibit B and hereby made a
part hereof, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer
at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND/EASEMENTS TO CITY: Concurrent with, and as part of, the
final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to convey the following to the City, free and clear
of any liens, mortgages, or other encumbrances, and free and clear of any environmentally
hazardous materials or conditions:
A. Outlot A, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, for park and open space purposes.
B. A drainage and utility easement for conservation purposes over Wetland #1008W as
designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and as depicted
in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
C. A drainage and utility easement for conservation of a deer corridor in the location as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
t_O
4. CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT: Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the Property,
Developer agrees to submit to the City and to obtain the City's approval of a cross-access
easement for that portion of the private driveway that crosses the southwest corner of proposed
Lot 1, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Prior to issuance by City of any building permit for said Lot 1, Developer agrees to file said
cross-access easement, as approved by the City, with Hennepin County, and to provide proof of
filing to the City.
5. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the
Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval
of:
A. Plans for streets including the redesign and restoration of the existing terminus of
Welter's Way, sanitary sewer, water, including extension of the six-inch water line from
the terminus of the cul-de-sac north to Sunnybrook Road, interim irrigation systems,
storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property.
B. Copies of all contracts, agreements, and written arrangements for services between
Developer and Developer's Project Design Engineer for construction phase services.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those
improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
6. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property,
Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a
land alteration permit for the Property. Developer and City acknowledge that there are 344
caliper inches of significant trees on the Property and that development of the Property will result
in the removal of 294 caliper inches of significant trees. Therefore, Developer acknowledges
that, along with other conditions of said land alteration permit, Developer shall be required to
mitigate such tree loss by replacement of 294 caliper inches of trees, in accordance with the tree
replacement plan attached hereto in Exhibit B.
7. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Concurrent with, and as part of street and
utility construction on the Property, Developer agrees to construct the following sidewalk and
trail:
A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk extended from its current terminus along existing
Welter's Way, northerly to the south boundary of the Property, and approximately 210
ft. along the west side of Welter's Way within the Property, as depicted in Exhibit D,
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
B. A eight-foot wide asphalt trail from the sidewalk through Outlot A, as depicted in Exhibit
D, attached hereto. Said trail shall be constructed to the proposed creek crossing, for a
length of approximately 200 ft. in the location as depicted in said Exhibit D.
Developer agrees to construct said sidewalk and trail in accordance with the terms and conditions
of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
8. BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION ESTABLISHED: Prior to issuance of any building
permit for any lot adjacent to the pond on the Property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto,
Developer agrees to submit to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City Engineer's approval of,
individual building plans which provide that the lowest floor elevation for all such structures on
such lots shall be as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Developer further agrees that, prior to issuance of any such building permit, Developer shall
field verify the footing elevations and provide certification of such elevations to the City
Engineer prior to masonry wall construction.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed„
those buildings on lots adjacent to such pond, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance
with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
9. CUL-DE-SAC OVER 500 FT.: City and Developer acknowledge that the cul-de-sac on the
Property exceeds the City Code maximum allowable cul-de-sac length of 500 ft. and that a
waiver to such requirement has been approved by the City.
10. FINAL ORDER #9I-006: Developer has obtained the following variances from City Code
provisions from the Board of Appeals through Final Order #91-006:
A. Lot 4, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be allowed a lot frontage of 20 ft.
on a cul-de-sac, instead of 55 ft.
B. Lots 5, 6, and 7, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be have a front yard
building setback of 25 ft., shall have building pads not exceeding 60 ft. in depth, and
shall have housing units which extend no further than 85 ft. into such lots as measured
from the front lot line.
Developer agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of approval of said Final Order #91-006,
a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E, and hereby made a part hereof.
Welter's Purgatory Acres
6th Addition
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN
WELTER'S 6TH ADDITION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AN!) THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1991, by and between J B& D, INC.,
a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
hereinafter referred to as "City":
For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance #7-91, changing the zoning of the
Property owned by Owner within the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, as more fully described in that
certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of , 1991, by and between Welter's 6th
Addition Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows:
I. If Welter's 6th Addition Limited Partnership fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's
Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the rezoning of the
Property to the Rural District.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns
of the Property.
3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring
that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Carl Jullie, City Manager
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
March 22, 1991
Ordinance NO. 11-91 Regarding Dumping Household Refuse in Public Trash
Receptacles
Earlier this year, the City Council requested the City Attorney to draft an ordinance making it
illegal to deposit household refuse in public trash receptacles. This has become more of a
problem in parks throughout the City as garbage collection rates have increased.
Staff recommend approval of the first reading of Ordinance NO. 11-91.
BL/mdd
ord11-91/bob
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. // -91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY
CODE CHAPTER 9 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES,
SEC. 9.04, SUBD. 4." BY ADDING A NEW PARAGRAPH A. A. AND
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99,
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Sec. 9.04, Subd. 4. is amended to add
paragraph A. A. to read as follows:
A. A. Deposits in public trash receptacles of
household refuse, including all organic material resulting from
the manufacture, preparation, or serving of food or food pro-
ducts, and spoiled, decayed or waste products from any source,
bottles, cans, glassware, paper or paper products, crockery,
ashes, rags, discarded clothing, tree or lawn clippings, leaves,
weeds, waste resulting from building construction, remodeling or
demolition, and other waste products, unless such refuse is the
result of activities in the park in which such public receptacle
is located.
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
'TR!
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 9.99 entitled
"Violation of Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety,
by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Eden Prairie on the day of
1991, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a
regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day
of , 1991.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Published in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1991.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager t
I
DATE: March 8, 1991
SUBJECT: Community and Business Survey Expense
Background:
On May 15, 1990. the City Council authorized approximately $20,000 for services
by Decision Resources, Ltd. (DRL), to conduct surveys of the business and
residential communities of Eden Prairie. As described in the first paragraph of
the attached memorandum, the City would ultimately be responsible for payment to
DRL of all services rendered, and the Chamber of Commerce would reimburse the
City for the costs associated with the business survey.
The final costs for the surveys were as follows:
Residential survey:
Business survey:
Total
Business Survey Balance:
$15,390
_4,700
$20,090
At issue is the outstanding bill from DRL for the business survey. Chamber
staff requested that the City pay the invoice for one-half of the fee ($2350)
from DRL at the start of the survey; it cited cash-flow difficulties and
verbally acknowledged it commitment to re-pay this fee. Since that time, the
Chamber has been able to raise $1,500 toward its $4,700 study and has remitted
this amount directly to ORL. A total of $850 is still due to DRL. Payments are
summarized as follows:
$2,350 paid (lent) by City
1,500 paid by Chamber
T57-3cd total paid
850 owed to DRL
177,77) total fee
At this time the Chamber has asked that the City pay the $850 balance owed to
Decision Resources. Marge Friederichs has indicated that the Chamber intends to
repay the amount advanced by the City ($2,350 + $850 = $3,200) through continued
fund-raising and/or its annual budgetary process. Since the Chamber is having
difficulty raising voluntary contributions, the Council may wish to consider
assuming a portion or all of the $3,200 amount owed by the Chamber because of
the value of information gained from the business survey.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the Council authorize payment of the $850 balance to
Decision Resources, Ltd. Total fees paid to DRL by the City would be $18,590,
an amount below the $20,000 limit for City expenses authorized by the Council.
The Council may wish to assume all or a portion of the $3,200 balance which
would be owed to the City.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THROUGH:
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
FROM:
Assistant to the City Manager Cr
a
i
g
W
.
D
a
w
s
o
n
DATE:
May 9, 1990
On February 20, 1990 the Council
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
o
f
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
f
o
r
Decision Resources, Ltd. to do a
s
u
r
v
e
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
of business owners and managers
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
.
I
t
w
a
s
estimated that the survey for th
e
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
w
o
u
l
d
c
o
s
t
$
4
,
0
0
0
,
a
n
a
m
o
u
n
t
f
o
r
which it would reimburse the Ci
t
y
.
After development of the questi
o
n
n
a
i
r
e
,
i
t
b
e
c
a
m
e
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
information the City wanted fro
m
t
h
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
c
o
s
t
i
n
excess of the $11,000 budget. T
h
e
l
a
t
e
s
t
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
r
o
m
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
,
Ltd. is $14,560. Inasmuch as
the survey is the first opportunity
i
n
a
l
o
n
g
time to ask residents about how
t
h
e
y
v
a
l
u
e
a
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
and issues, it is in the City's
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
t
o
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
a
s
comprehensive as possible. In a
s
e
n
s
e
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
c
o
u
l
d
t
a
k
e
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
the efficiency of retaining the
"
c
a
p
t
i
v
e
a
u
d
i
e
n
c
e
"
o
n
t
h
e
t
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
.
I
t
appears that the only way of mak
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
c
o
s
t
s
i
s
t
o
delete whole sections entirely.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
can provide valuable insight int
o
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
it would appear that the added c
o
s
t
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
g
o
o
d
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
m
e
n
d
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
with Decison Resources, Ltd. in
o
r
d
e
r
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
f
e
e
f
o
r
i
t
s
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
City not exceed $20,000.
CWD:jdp
I II u I.) l• I
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor City Council
City Manager Carl J. Jullie
Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson
Community Survey
February 16, 1990
Several suburban communities have conducted professional surveys of their
residents in order to assess the services provided and requested by their
residents. These surveys can be valuable tools for City Councils to understand
better the characteristics and preferences of their residents. With this
information, services can be planned, designed, and be placed in perspective
when establishing budgets. Surveys can also point out the many things a city is
doing well.
Funds were authorized for such a survey in the 1989 budget. About the time that
staff was ready to request proposals, the issue of the proposed settlement with
the landfill expansion litigation beame a focus of community attention. Because
this issue was highly controversial, staff believed it could color the responses
to the survey. Consequently, the survey was not conducted.
Recently, the Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce suggested that the City and the
Chamber do a community survey jointly. The City would benefit from the survey
data as described above. Responses to the business portion of the survey would
provide the City with information from an important, sizable non-voting
constituency. Some questions of the residents would be of interest to the
Chamber, and some questions of the business community would be of interest to
the City. Given the complementary interest, it would be efficient to do these
surveys at the same time.
Decision Resources, Ltd. has submitted a proposal to perform the surveys. It
has conducted these types of surveys for most other suburban cities.
Discussions with staff members in several cities have indicated high levels of
satisfaction with the work done and fees charged by Decision Resources. The
fees proposed for Eden Prairie are comparable to those charged to other cities.
The Chamber of Commerce has indicated it is satisfied with the proposal; it is
willing to fund its portion of the survey (estimated to be $4,000).
Decision Resources would bring not only proven performance and professionalism
to the study, but it would use data from other community surveys for comparison.
This dimension would give more than a "snapshot" view of Eden Prairie.
Should the Council approve the survey work, City and Chamber teams would work
with Decision Resources staff to refine the questions and topics to be covered.
It is expected that the random telpehone surveys would be conducted in April.
Costs for the City/Chamber study should fall into the $12,000-$15,000 range
according to the Decision Resources proposal. Funds for this study are
available from the General Fund surplus.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council retain the services of
Decisions Resources, Ltd. to conduct a survey of residents and businesses at a
cost not to exceed $15,000. The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce would commit
$4,000 to this study.
CWO:CJJ:jdp
n
•
4113
0
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
DATE:
March 22, 1991
SUBJECT:
Revenue Bond Fees
Background
In prior years, cities could issue industrial revenue bonds for all
k
i
n
d
s
o
f
commercial, industrial, and housing developments. The interest tha
t
t
h
e
s
e
b
o
n
d
s
earn is non-taxable. Accordingly, the end result for the developer
o
r
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
owner should be a lower interest rate for their financing. A city m
a
y
i
s
s
u
e
revenue bonds without a public referendum. However, it cannot pledg
e
t
h
e
f
u
l
l
faith and credit of the community for these bonds, thus the City may
n
o
t
t
a
x
property owners to pay principal and interest on them, so there is l
i
t
t
l
e
,
i
f
any, financial risk to the community.
More recently, the Federal government has put on many new restrictio
n
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
revenue bonding. Housing revenue bonds may still be issued, but prim
a
r
i
l
y
f
o
r
the benefit of families with low and moderate incomes. Both single-f
a
m
i
l
y
a
n
d
multi-family residential housing is eligible. Industrial revenue
b
o
n
d
s
m
a
y
n
o
w
only be issued to businesses which are primarily "manufacturing".
O
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
commercial uses are no longer eligible. Following these changes,
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
has not issued any revenue bonds for new commercial/industrial pro
j
e
c
t
s
s
i
n
c
e
1985.
To-date, Eden Prairie has issued a total of $355,648,360 in revenu
e
b
o
n
d
s
f
o
r
113 projects, including all refundings.
The City's most recent involvement with revenue bonding has been w
i
t
h
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
multi-family projects which have come through our process for refi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
,
sometimes due to default on the bond payments and resulting forecl
o
s
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
mortgages.
City Fees
In 1984, the law firm of O'Connor & Hannan made a proposal to the C
i
t
y
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a "Reserve Fund", as other cities had done (i.e., Mpls. & St. Paul)
b
y
essentially "pooling" the available arbitrage earnings and fees on
C
i
t
y
i
s
s
u
e
d
revenue bonds. The Council chose not to proceed, because the propo
s
a
l
b
e
c
a
m
e
less viable as the rules regarding arbitrage earnings were tightene
d
.
W
h
a
t
d
i
d
result, however, was the City's current practice of charging 1/8 of
1
%
o
n
t
h
e
outstanding balance of revenue bonds issued on qualifying projects a
s
p
e
r
Resolution No. 85-135 (copy attached). The resulting revenues go t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
General Fund and can be used for any purpose for which the City is
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
t
o
expend funds. For projects financed through revenue bonds, there is
a
l
w
a
y
s
a
representation by the developer that the project is not feasible without the
City's issuance of revenue bonds or obligations.
Mayor and City Council
March 22, 1991
Page Two
Staff has been interpreting Resolution No. 85-135 to also apply to projects
which come in to us for refinancing, even though they may have received an
inducement resolution prior to May 21, 1985. Recently, some developers seeking
refinancing have objected to this charge, saying that they should contine to be
exempt because their projects were approved by the City prior to 1985 and that
for a refinancing they do not need an "inducement" resolution. Because of this
uncertainty, we have suspended imposition of the fee until the Council makes a
determination.
The following is a list of projects involving refinancing which have agreed to
pay the 1/8% City fee, even though their inducement resolutions may have come
before May 21, 1985. A project already paying the 1/8% fee is not charged an
additional 1/8% upon refinancing.
1991 Est.Future Fee
Project Year Issue Amount City Fee to be collected
Minnesota Supply 1987 $ 700,000 $ 800 $ 8,750
Edenvale Apts. 1989 5,500,000 6,900 69,000
Lakeview Business Ctr.1989 2,900,000 3,400 34,000
McGlynn Bakeries 1989 2,000,000 2,600 26,000
Eden Commons Apts. 1990 6,600,000 7,400 74,400
Parkway Apts. 1990 13,800,000 17,200 172,000
Eden Investments 1990 2,700,000 3,300 33,000
The revenue side of the 1991 City budget anticipates $80,000 in revenue from the
1/8% fee. Of this total, $41,600 is scheduled to come from the "refinancing"
projects. Attached is a listing of other cities and their corresponding
charges.
I suggest that the Council review this matter and determine a policy for staff
to follow. These options are submitted for your consideration:
Option 1
Continue to impose the 1/8% fee on all new projects, including all
forms of refinancing. The appropriate Council action would be:
Approve Section 3.13 of Fee Resolution No. 91-08 to read
as follows:
Charges for Tax Exempt Financing
$800 application fee per each transaction, and 1/8 of
1% on the upaid principal balance at the end of each
12-month period.
This charge is effective for all new projects receiving final
Council authorization on or after March 1, 1991 and for all
existing projects receiving final Council authorization on or
after March 1, 1991 for refunding, or for change in project
ownership, security or maturity date of the revenue bonds.
This resolution has no effect on projects currently responsible
for a fee pursuant to Resolution No. 85-135 and its subsequent
reauthorizations.
11 11,
iiA
mdydr ddU LI t.y LUUdCli
March 22, 1991
Page Three
Option 2
Continue to impose the 1/8% fee on all new projects, including
refinancing, but excluding refinancings which are requesting a change
solely in interest rate and/or ownership. The appropriate Council
action would be to:
Approve Section 3.13 of Fee Resolution No. 91-08 to read as
follows:
Charges for Tax Exempt Financing
$800 application fee per each transaction, and 1/8 of
1% on the unpaid principal balance at the end of each
12-month period.
This charge is effective for all new projects receiving final
Council authorization on or after March 1, 1991 and for all
existing projects receiving final Council authorization on or
after March 1, 1991 for refunding, or for change in security or
maturity date of the revenue bonds, but excluding projects
receiving Council authorization on or after March 1, 1991 for
change solely in interest rate and/or project ownership.
This resolution has no effect on projects currently responsible
for a fee pursuant to Resolution No. 85-135 and its subsequent
reauthorizations.
Option 3
Continue to use the 1/8% fee on all new projects, but not on refinancing
when the original issue was not subject to the 1/8% fee. The appropriate
Council action would be to:
Charges for Tax Exempt Financing
$800 application fee per each transaction, and 1/8 of 1%
on the unpaid principal balance at the end of each 12-month
period.
This charge is effective for all new projects receiving final
Council authorization on or after March 1, 1991 for the issuance
of revenue bonds.
This resolution has no effect on projects currently responsible
for a fee pursuant to Resolution No. 85-135 and its subsequent
reauthorizations.
This option could reduce future fee collections by about $540,000. There
are $27,000,000 in bonds which are likely to be refinanced and another
$16,000,000 which might be refunded.
CJJ:jdp
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 85-135
AMENDING RESOLUTION 85-10 (FEE RESOLUTION)
BE IT RESOLVED that Section 3.12 be added to Resolution
No. 85-10 as follows:
3.12 Charges for Tax Exempt Financing
$800 application fee per each transaction
1/8 of 1% on the unpaid principle balance
at the end of each 12 month period.
Effective for projects receiving inducement resolutions
after May 21, 1985.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 4, 1985.
ATTEST
1.2 ( •
CITY
Anoka
Apple Valley
Blaine
Bloomington
Brooklyn Center
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Champlin
Chanhassen
Chaska
Columbia Heights
Coon Rapids
Crystal
Dayton
Deephaven
Edina
Fridley
Golden Valley
Maple Grove
Minneapolis
Minnetonka
New Hope
Osseo
TELEPHONE #
421-6630
431-8800
784-6700
881-5811
569-3300
424-8000
895-4400
421-8100
937-1900
448-2851
782-2800
755-2880
537-8421
427-4589
474-4755
927-8861
571-3450
593-8000
420-4000
673-2574
939-8200
533-1521
425-2624
FEE
None
None
None
None
One time fee
None
One time fee
None
None
None
None
One time issuance
charge
None
Deducted from
escrow account
None
None
For industrial bonds
put Money in
"deposit" that they
draw money to defray
None
One time charge
1/8 of 1% or 1/16 of
1% depending
None
None
No response
Plymouth
Richfield
Robbinsdale
Shakopee
Wayzata
Cottage Grove
Eagan
Forest Lake
Hastings
Inver Grove Heights
Maplewood
Mendota Heights
Mounds view
New Brighton
North St. Paul
Oakdale
St. Paul
South St. Paul
Stillwater
White Bear Lake
Woodbury
Wyoming
550-5000
861-9700
537-4534
445-3650
473-0234
458-2800
454-8100
464-3550
437-4127
457-2111
770-4500
452-1850
784-3055
633-1533
770-4450
739-5086
298-4012
450-8702
439-6121
429-8526
739-5972
462-5426
No response
None
i5 of 1% for the first
two years 1/10 there-
after
None
None
None
1/8th of 1%
None
None
No response
IA of 1% first year
1/8 of 1% thereafter
1% of 1% first %
million, 55% of 1%
next two million, 4%
of 1% next 7.5
million, 1/8% of 1%
over 10 million
No response
None
None
None
1/10th, then 4 of 1%
at closing.
None
None
One time fee
None
None
RFRH/ap:C/TIES