Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 08/07/1990
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL ( TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 1990 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive • COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas Tenpas CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CDMMENDATIONS TO THOSE THAT PARTICIPATED IN SAFETY CAMP Page 1724 I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Board of Review meeting held Tuesday, May 8 1990 Page 172E B. Special City Council/Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Page 1761 Commission meeting held Tuesday, July 10,—99 C. City Council meeting Tuesday, July 10, 1990 Page 1764 D. City Council meeting held Tuesday, July 17, 1990 Page 1776 III. CONSENT CALENDAR Page 1787 A. Clerk's License List B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 18-90, Amendment to the Chapter 11.03, Page 178E mod. 2� of the City Code—TBuilding Height Ordinance) C. Resolution No. 90-189, Approving Election Judges for the Page L795 September 1171990 Primary Election D. BENTEC by Bentec Engineering Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Page 1798 N -90, Zoning District Amendment within the Office District; Approval of Supplement to Developer's Agreement for Bentec; Adoption of Resolution N. 90-196, Authorizing Sumary of Ordinance No. 24-90, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-197, Site Plan Approval for Bentec. 1.B5 acres with variances reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of 1900 square foot addition to the Bentec Engineering building. Location: 13050 Pioneer Trail. (Ordinance No. 24-90 - Zoning District Amendment; Resolution No. 90-196 - Authorizing Summary and Publication; Resolution No. 90-197 - Site Plan Approval) City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 7, 1990 F. CDBG SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT - Resolution No. 90-188, Authorizing Page 1806 Execution of Agreement G. Award Bid for Firearm Training System Page 1808 H. Resolution No. 90-202 Chan in the Amount of RefundingBonds for Page 1809 Eden Glen Apartmentssffrom ,1 070 to 2,7T5, 0, and Amending the Indenture of Trust to Give F.H.A. Certain Rights in the Event of Default I. Authorize City staff to Contract Ug to $10,000 for the Liquor Store Page 1811 Study and Authorize Entering nti o a year Lease for the Prairie Village liquor tore J. CHI CHI'S EXPANSION. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 25-90, Zoning Page 1812 District Amendment within the Commercial-Regional-Service District; Adoption of Resolution No. 9D-203, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 25-90 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary (Ordinance No. 25-90 - Zoning District Amendment; Resolution No. 9D-203 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) K. Approve Deeds Modifying Access Control on T.H.. 169 Adjacent Page 1818 Century Bank L. Resolution No. 90-187, Snowdrifters Snowmobile Trail Page 1821 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ST. ANDREW PARKING LOT EXPANSIDN. Request for Comprehensive Page 1823 Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Public on 3.5 acres; Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 3.5 acres, with a variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Site Plan Review on 3.5 acres, Preliminary Plat of 12.4 acres into 2 lots, one outlot and road right-of-way for construction of additional parking spaces. Location: Northwest corner of Baker Road and St. Andrew Drive. (Resolution No. 90-198 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance No. 27-90 - Rezoning from Rural to Public; Resolution No. 90-199 - Preliminary Plat) B. BORUCKI ADDIITON by Jim Borucki. Request for Preliminary Plat of Page 1837 . 2 acres into single family lots within the R1-13.5 Zoning District with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. Location: 6517 Rowland Road. (Ordinance No. 28-90 - Zoning District Amendment; Resolution No. 90-2D0 - Preliminary Plat) C. R.G. READ OFFICE/WAREHOUSE by R. G. Read & Company, Inc. Request page 1844 for Zo in ng District Amendment and Site Plan Review within the I-2 Zoning District on 3.79 acres, Preliminary Plat of 5 acres into 2 lots for construction of a 43,944 square foot office/warehouse building. Location: Edenvale Industrial Park (Ordinance No. 29-90 - Zoning District Amendment; Resolution No. 90-201 - Preliminary Plat) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 1854 A 1 City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 7, 1990 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request Regarding 1990 Shooting Zones Page 1855 B. Request from the Fairway Woods Condominium Association regarding page 1863 Mitchell tRoad-Eulvert VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment to fill an unexpired term ending February 28, 1983 on the Historian; Cultural CommisiTon B. Appointment to fill an unexpired term ending February 282 1992 on the Parks Recreation & NaturirTisources Commission X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. Set Special City Council Meetings Page 1880 B. Report of City Manager C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Yard/Tree Waste Disposal Page 1881 F. Report of Finance Director G. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Receive Bids and Award Contract for Utility and Street Improvements within Bluffs East 7E Addition-7.C. 52-195 XI. NEW 8USINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT A COMMENDATION TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT A highly successful, pioneering, innovative program, the first Eden Prairie Safety Camp introduced youth to life-long safety awareness. The creativity of our public employees to combine fun and learning about this serious and important issue was truly remarkable. Extensive news coverage, questions about registration next year, and inquiries from other communities all demonstrate the value of the Safety Camp concept and point to a worthwhile investment in continuing this program. For its involvement in developing and running the 1990 Eden Prairie Safety Camp, the Eden Prairie City Council hereby commends the EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and expresses its respect and gratitude to the public employees who so enthusiastically served the community through this program. Present this 7th day of August, 1990. SEAL Gary D. Peterson, Mayor on behalf of Councilmembers Richard Anderson Jean Harris Patricia Pidcock Douglas Tenpas A COMMENDATION TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT A highly successful, pioneering, innovative program, the first Eden Prairie Safety Camp introduced youth to life-long safety awareness. The creativity of our public employees to combine fun and learning about this serious and important issue was truly remarkable. Extensive news coverage, questions about registration next year, and inquiries from other communities all demonstrate the value of the Safety Camp concept and point to a worthwhile investment in continuing this program. For its involvement in developing and running the 1990 Eden Prairie Safety Camp, the Eden Prairie City Council hereby commends the EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT and expresses its respect and gratitude to the public employees who so enthusiastically served the community through this program. Present this 7th day of August, 1990. SEAL Gary D. Peterson, Mayor on behalf of Councilmembers Richard Anderson Jean Harris Patricia Pidcock Douglas Tenpas L_ . J A COMMENDATION TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENT A highly successful, pioneering, innovative program, the first Eden Prairie Safety Camp introduced youth to life-long safety awareness. The creativity of our public employees to combine fun and learning about this serious and important issue was truly remarkable. Extensive news coverage, questions about registration next year, and inquiries from other communities all demonstrate the value of the Safety Camp concept and point to a worthwhile investment in continuing this program. For its involvement in developing and running the 1990 Eden Prairie Safety Camp, the Eden Prairie City Council hereby commends the EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENT and expresses its respect and gratitude to the public employees who so enthusiastically served the community through this program. Present this 7th day of August, 1990. SEAL Gary D. Peterson, Mayor on behalf of Councilmembers Richard Anderson Jean Harris Patricia Pidcock Douglas Tenpas } A COMMENDATION TO THE MINNESOTA STATE PATROL A highly successful, pioneering, innovative program, the first Eden Prairie Safety Camp introduced youth to life-long safety awareness. The creativity of our public employees to combine fun and learning about this serious and important issue was truly remarkable. Extensive news coverage, questions about registration next year, and inquiries from other communities all demonstrate the value of the Safety Camp concept and point to a worthwhile investment in continuing this program. For its involvement in developing and running the 1990 Eden Prairie Safety Camp, the Eden Prairie City Council hereby commends the MINNESOTA STATE PATROL and expresses its respect and gratitude to the public employees who so enthusiastically served the community through this program. Present this 7th day of August, 1990. SEAL Gary D. Peterson, Mayor on behalf of Councilmembers Richard Anderson Jean Harris Patricia Pidcock Douglas Tenpas j,, ...f r UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF REVIEW TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990 7:30 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive BOARD OF REVIEW MEMBERS: Chairman Gary D. Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas Tenpas BOARD OF REVIEW STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Assessor Steve Sinell, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members were present. I. RECONVENE BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING The meeting was called to order by Chairman Peterson. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried unanimously. II. APPROVAL OF BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING HELD THURSDAY. APRIL 19. 1990 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Minutes of the Board of Review meeting held Thursday, April 19, 1990, as published. Motion carried unanimously. III. mVIEW OF ITEMS CONTINUED FROM APRIL 19. 1990 2. RICHARD HENDRICKSON--PID 15-116-22 33 0021 Mr. Hendrickson was not present. MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value on the Hendrickson property, PID 15-116-22 33 0021, at $72,000. Motion carried unanimously. ` 3. LEONARD KODET--PID 04-116-22 23 0039 Mr. Kodet was not present. .'1. Board of Review 2 May 8, 1990 i MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to sustain the estimated market value on the Kodet property, PID 04- 116-22 23 0039, at $90,700. Motion carried unanimously. 11. ROBERT MORGEL--PID 24-116-22 31 0107 Mr. Morgel was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value on the Morgel property, PID 24- 116-22 31 0107, to $180,900. Motion carried unanimously. 14. JANICE PATTERSON--PID 24-116-22 43 0010 Ms Patterson was not present. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the estimated market value on the Patterson property, PID 24- 116-22 43 0010, to $141,300. Motion carried unanimously. 19. JOHN BERGH, JR.--PID 25-116-22 33 0038 Mr. Bergh was not present. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the estimated market value on the Patterson property, PID 25- 116-22 33 0038, to $249,000. Motion carried unanimously. 23. ROBERT RASCHKE--PID 05-116-22 14 0012 Mr. Raschke was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value on the Raschke property, PID 05-116-22 14 0012, at $136,900. Motion carried unanimously. 26. BARB & BILL CADOGAN--PID 23-116-22 44 0023 Mrs. Cadogan said she questioned one of the comparisons as no one from the assessor's office has been in that particular home and it was rated with inferior design and appeal. She said the real concern should be what these houses are selling for. She said she didn't understand the basis for the valuation per square foot. Peterson said there are a lot of variables in addition to the square foot value. Sinell explained the method staff uses in reviewing comparable properties and comparing them to the subject property. Board of Review 3 May 8, 1990 Tenpas said he thought design appeal is almost totally subjective. Peterson said he would agree that the whole appraisal process is not an exact science. Pidcock asked what the estimated market value was in 1989. Sinell said it was $397,200. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value of the Cadogan property, PID 23-116-22 44 0023, to $385,000. Motion carried unanimously. 27. FRED SAXE--PID 02-116-22 32 0007 Mr. Saxe distributed information relating his property to other property around him. He said the lot value on the appraisal was $160,000 with $90,000 for the house. He noted that a lot down the street from him was appraised at $70,000. He said his lot receives runoff from adjacent lots and he has no beach along his lakeshore. Peterson asked Sinell about the situation with the $70,000 lot. Sinell said it was a lot that had serious soil problems. He also noted that lakeshore is a very limited resource. Anderson commented that the $70,000 lot had not sold because it was considered unbuildable. Tenpas asked if there is anything within the system that allows for relief in such a situation where people with fixed incomes who have owned property for a long time are in danger of being taxed out of their homes. Sinell said some relief is provided through the series of income tax credits provided by the State of Minnesota with the Income Adjusted Homestead credit. Harris asked if a 25% increment in the land value was general in this area. Sinell said there was an increase in the range and the average was about 33%. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Peterson, to sustain the estimated market value on the Saxe property, PID 02- 116-22 32 0007, at $250,600. Motion carried with Pidcock opposed. 32. CAROL HOEFT--PID 24-116-22 21 0005 Ms Hoeft was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain ( the estimated market value on the Hoeft property, PID 24- 116-22 21 0005, at $152,000. Motion carried unanimously. 34. GERALD MCGRAW--PID 26-116-22 31 0008 Board of Review 4 May 8, 1990 r Mr. McGraw was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value on the McGraw property, PID 26- 116-22 31 0008, to $120,000. Motion carried unanimously. 38. DAVID STEWART--PID 26-116-22 11 0008 A representative for Mr. Stewart said they purchased the home in January of 1990 for $520,000 and the current value is set at $575,000. She said she thought the purchase price was a more fair value on the house. Sinell said they compared this with three houses recently sold to arrive at the review appraisal of $547,000. He said there was a comparable next door to this property that was used on the review appraisal. Pidcock asked if there were any unusual circumstances that allowed them to obtain the property so reasonably. Mr. Stewart's representative said the house was vacant and the original owner finished the basement. She said the lower level finishing was inferior and the audio system was not complete. Pidcock asked how long it had been on the market. Mr. Stewart's representative said it had been vacant for six months. Pidcock said she thought $520,000 was a valid valuation since it was the purchase price in January. Sinell said it was a relocation sale and the property next door was built by the same builder. Anderson asked if the assessor had been in both this property and the one next door. Sinell said the assessor was in both properties. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to adjust the estimated market value on the Stewart property, PID 26- 116-22 11 0008, to $520,000. Peterson noted that this was a corporate sale and the seller may not have been as willing as a private owner. Sinell said the ultimate seller is overly motivated to sell in those circumstances. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion failed with Anderson, Harris and Peterson opposed. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value on the Stewart property, PID 26-116-22 11 0008, to $533,500. Board of Review 5 May 8, 1990 i Tenpas said he thought this sale illustrates what is happening to the value of homes in that area. He said the inventory there is high so the value was $520,000. Peterson commented that the numbers and figures indicate that values have not gone down below the estimated market values of the properties. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried with Pidcock opposed. 40. AMERICAN LEGION--PID 17-116-22 14 0087 A representative of the American Legion was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjust the estimated market value of the American Legion property, PID 17-116-22 14 0087, to $1,400,000. Motion carried unanimously. 45. CLARENCE SCHAFER--PID 01-116-22 32 0012 Mr. Schafer said he questioned the comparables used. He said his house is 33 years old and is in need of a lot of repair and he said that wasn't taken into consideration. Sinell said the appraiser felt those items were typical of problems in houses of that age. He said they were similar to the kinds of things the comparables suffered from. He said the three comparables are all on the same street, in the same neighborhood. Harris noted that this was a $16,300 increment in one year. Sinell said this was one of the revalution neighborhoods. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Tenpas, to adjust the estimated market value on the Schafer property, PID 01- 116-22 32 0012, to $103,800. Motion carried with Peterson opposed. 46. BRUCE HAVERLY--PID 27-116-22 14 0023 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value of the Haverly property, PID 27- 116-22 14 0023, to $122,000. Motion carried unanimously. 49. KENT CARLSON--PID 05-116-22 42 0023 54. STEVEN JENKINS--PID 26-116-22 24 0066 60. FRANK DIXON--PID 23-116-22 44 0003 63. MARVIN SEGAL--PID 24-116-22 33 0005 Board of Review 6 May 8, 1990 t: f 64. JAMES KAUFMAN--PID 09-116-22 23 0036 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to set the estimated market values on the above four properties as follows: Carlson property PID-05-116-22 42 0023 $130,000 Jenkins property PID 26-116-22 24 0066 $110,000 Dixon property PID 23-116-22 44 0003 $375,000 Segal property PID 24-116-22 33 0005 $379,000 Kaufman property PID 09-116-22 23 0036 $143,600 Motion carried unanimously. 72. ROY & RUTH LECY--PID 23-116-22 43 0017 Mrs. Lecy said she believed the appraiser had incorrect information on the comparables. She said the house has been on the market for 285 days. She said she had questions regarding the comparables in the areas of design appeal, additional features of other comparables not considered, and the adjustment for location. L Sinell said there is a very minor difference between the appraiser and the Lecy's and he would suggest splitting the difference. MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjust the estimated market value of the Lecy property, PID 23- 116-22 43 0017, to $335,000. Motion carried with Pidcock opposed. 79. R. BJELLAND/T. SCHWARTZ--PID 02-116-22 34 0003 80. ORLO JOHNSON--PID 14-116-22 31 0032 81. TJH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP--PID 14-116-22 31 0033 82. TJH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP--PID 14-116-22 31 0041 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to set the estimated market values on the above four properties as follows: Bjelland property PID 02-116-22 34 0003 $449,300 Johnson property PID 14-116-22 31 0032 $ 87,300 TJH Ltd. Ptnrshp. PID 14-116-22 31 0033 $202,700 TJH Ltd. Ptnrshp. PID 14-116-22 31 0041 $306,000 Motion carried unanimously. i► 91. BIHARI DESAI--PID 17-116-22 12 0058 1 J; Board of Review 7 May 8, 1990 Mr. Desai reviewed his reasons for disagreeing with the estimated market value. He said his property does not have a lake view. Sinell said sales figures support the valuation of $77,200. He said you have to consider the highest and best use is for owner-occupied property. MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value of the Desai property, PID 17-116- 22 12 0058, at 877,200. Motion carried with Pidcock abstaining. 95. DONALD SORENSON--PID 11-116-22 11 0020 Mr. Sorenson said his lot does not have City sewer and is on a street that is gravel with a tar overlay. He said comparable lots are valued at $40-50,000 while his is valued at $85,000. Sinell said he thought Mr. Sorenson's concerns had been adequately addressed in the comparables. Pidcock asked about the increase in the lot value. Sinell said they had trended the totals and the land should have been higher and the building lower. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjust the estimated market value of the Sorenson property, PID 11-116-22 11 0020, to $215,000. Motion carried with Pidcock and Tenpas opposed. 96. WILLIAM & KAREN GOON--PID 25-116-22 22 0028 Mr. & Mrs. Goon were not present. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value on the Goon property, PID 25- 116-22 22 0028, at $287,700. Motion carried unanimously. 101. LONNY GULDEN--PID 23-116-22 13 0018 Mr. Gulden was not present. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value on the Gulden property, PID 23-116-22 13 0018, to $185,000. Motion carried unanimously. 104. JAMES & LORI OLSON--PID 05-116-22 12 0040 } Mr. & Mrs. Olson were not present. Board of Review 8 May 8, 1990 r • MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value of the Olson property, PID 05- 116-22 12 0040, at $231,000. Motion carried unanimously. 106. KENNETH SHANNON--PID 07-116-22 32 0037 Mr. Shannon was not present. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjust the estimated market value of the Shannon property, PID 07-116-22 32 0037, to $133,000. Motion carried unanimously. 108. DOUGLAS MACLEAN--PID 24-116-22 24 0104 Mr. MacLean was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value on the MacLean property, PID 24- 116-22 24 0104, to $300,000. Motion carried unanimously. 109. SHIRLEY MOYER KNUTSON--PID 26-116-22 21 0006 Ms Knutson was not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjust the estimated market value on the Knutson property, PID 26-116-22 21 0006, to $146,000. Motion carried unanimously. 111. ANN & GERALD KALIN--PID 24-116-22 21 0006 Mr. & Mrs. Kalin were not present. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value of the Kalin pruperty, PID 24- 116-22 21 0006, to $183,000. Motion carried unanimously. 114. LAWRENCE KITTS--PID 25-116-22 22 0023 Mr. Kitts said he believes what doesn't sell is the driving market price. He said there are 14 homes for sale in his area and most of them have been on the market over a year. Sinell said the three comparables are very similar. Tenpas said he was concerned that there seems to be no way to analyze the situation when homes in a particular area are not selling. Sinell said those houses that sold in the same area were exposed to the same market and it did affect their prices. Tenpas said he thought relocation sales had to be factored in somehow. Board of Review 9 May 8, 1990 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Peterson, to sustain the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25- 116-22 22 0023, at $378,000. Motion failed with Pidcock and Tenpas opposed and Harris abstaining. MOTION: Tenpas moved to adjust the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25-116-22 22 0023, to $360,000. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION: Harris moved to adjust the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25-116-22 22 0023, to $366,000. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to adjust the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25-116- 22 22 0023, to $358,000. Motion failed with Anderson and Peterson opposed and Harris abstaining. MOTION: Pidcock moved to adjust the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25-116-22 22 0023, to $359,000. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION: Tenpas moved to adjust the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25-116-22 22 0023, to $365,000. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value of the Kitts property, PID 25- 116-22 22 0023, to $373,000. Motion carried with Pidcock and Tenpas opposed. 115. JOHN & TERRI CAIN--PID 23-116-22 44 0012 Mr. & Mrs. Cain were not present. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value of the Cain property, PID 23-116- 22 44 0012, to $348,000. Motion carried unanimously. 116. CYNTHIA CHADWICK--PID 17-116-22 12 0073 Ms Chadwick said she was concerned that the bad location of her property was not taken into consideration. Sinell said they used three homes of the same style in the same neighborhood for the comparables. MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Harris, to adjust the estimated market value of the Chadwick property, PID 17- 116-22 12 0073, to $71,200. Motion carried unanimously. 117. DENNIS SCHEPPMAN--PID 05-116-22 13 0023 ' �I Board of Review 10 May 8, 1990 i Mr. Scheppman said he had a problem with the comparables used. He said he has a multi-level house and it is difficult to find comparables with the same style. Sinell said this is a split-level with a tuck-under garage which makes it an unusual style of house for this area. Scheppman said he objected to the fact that the comparables selected were in different neighborhoods. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the estimated market value of the Scheppman property, PID 05- 116-22 13 0023, to $162,000. Motion carried unanimously. 122. R. BOUVIN/T. SCHWARTZ--PID 01-116-22 44 0012 Mr. Bouvin was not present. • MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value of the Bouvin property, PID 01-116-22 44 0012, at $1,868,000. Motion carried unanimously. 129. HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT--PID 11-116-22 42 0020 a 130. HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT--PID 11-116-22 42 0032 131. HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT--PID 11-116-22 42 0035 132. HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT--PID 11-116-22 44 0011 133. CREEK KNOLLS PARTN.--PID 36-116-22 21 0037 134. CREEK KNOLLS PARTN.--PID 36-116-22 21 0038 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to set the estimated market values on the six properties as follows: Hustad Dvlpmnt. PID 11-116-22 42 0020 $431,200 Hustad Dvlpmnt. PID 11-116-22 42 0032 $108,700 Hustad Dvlpmnt. PID 11-116-22 42 0035 $ 62,000 Hustad Dvlpmnt. PID 11-116-22 44 0011 $132,000 Creek Knolls Partn. PID 36-116-22 21 0037 $100,000 Creek Knolls Partn. PID 36-116-22 21 0038 $105,000 Motion carried unanimously. 137. TOM KOL80--PID 23-116-22 43 0016 ` Mr. Kolbo said he did not think the comparables used for his review appraisal were fair in terms of view and other details. He said he is on the north side of the street and overlooks the swamp. He said other homes with lots • I Board of Review 11 May 8, 1990 similar to his are valued less than his property. He said his land value should be closer to $85,000 than $110,000. Sinell said he thought the location had been taken into consideration in the comparables. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjust the estimated market value of the Kolbo property, PID 23- 116-22 43 0016, to $303,500, with the entire adjustment to be taken off the estimated value of the land. Motion carried unanimously. 139. JEFFREY COLEMAN--PID 35-116-22 11 0072 140. GARY HAMMER--PID 26-116-22 42 0009 141. BRIAN ROSENBERGER--PID 09-116-22 31 0007 142. BRIAN ROSENBERGER--PID 09-116-22 31 0006 143. WILLIAM LINDNER--PID 26-116-22 12 0024 144. JOHN BURKLAND--PID 04-116-22 43 0093 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to set the estimated market values of the six properties as follows: Jeffrey Coleman PID 35-116-22 11 0072 $167,000 Gary Hammer PID 26-116-22 42 0009 $133,000 Brian Rosenberger PID 09-116-22 31 0007 $127,400 Brian Rosenberger PID 09-116-22 31 0006 $125,800 William Lindner PID 26-116-22 12 0024 $242,200 John Burkland PID 04-116-22 43 0093 $113,300 Motion carried unanimously. 145. DALE b MARCIA LAFRENZ--PID 04-116-22 43 0104 Mr. & Mrs. LaFrenz were not present. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value of the LaFrenz property, PID 04-116-22 43 0104, at $209,900. Motion carried unanimously. 146. M. THOMPSON/T. SCHWARTZ--PID 06-116-22 32 0039 147. M. THOMPSON/T. SCHWARTZ--PID 36-116-22 22 0003 _ 148. ESTELLE KNUDSON--PID 11-116-22 11 0012 149. LAWRENCE BISTODEAU--PID 23-116-22 43 0039 Board of Review 12 May 8, 1990 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to set the estimated market value of the four properties as follows: M. Thompson PID 06-116-22 32 0039 $128,000 M. Thompson PID 36-116-22 22 0003 $245,000 Estelle Knudson PID 11-116-22 11 0012 $182,100 Lawrence Bistodeau PID 23-116-22 43 0039 $298,000 Motion carried unanimously. 150. JOHN JENKINS/JEFF SELL--PID 22-116-22 24 0019 Mr. Sell E. Mr. Jenkins were not present. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to sustain the estimated market value of the Jenkins property, PID 22-116-22 24 0019, at $80,000. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to extend the meeting of the Board of Review to 11:30 PM. Motion carried • unanimously. 151. RAYMOND LAPLANTE--PID 08-116-22 21 0014 Mr. LaPlante said his valuation increased $3,400 and he was not sure he could stay in his home with such an increase. He said they have no water and sewer on their property. Sinell said this appeal had just been received. Peterson said because there is no information available on the property he thought the Council would have to sustain the valuation; however, he suggested that Mr. LaPlante could appeal to the County if he so desired. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to sustain the estimated market value of the LaPlante property, PID 08-116-22 21 0014, at $74,200. Motion carried unanimously. 152. ROGER E. DEBORAH VANTASSEL--PID 26-116-22 31 0029 Mr. VanTassel said he had purchased the home for $92,000 ten months ago and he thought the valuation of $101,000 was too high. Tenpas asked him if he had made any improvements. VanTassel said he had put in carpeting and did some decorating. (. Sinell noted that the seller of the property was in legal trouble at the time of the sale. • Board of Review 13 May 8, 1990 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to set the estimated market value of the VanTassel property, PID 26- 116-22 31 0029, at $95,500. Motion carried unanimously. 123. KYLE FELDMAN/AGENT--PID 12-116-22 41 0007 124. KYLE FELDMAN/AGENT--PID 12-116-22 12 0004 125. KYLE FELDMAN/AGENT--PID 12-116-22 42 0013 Sinell said these properties are office/warehouse properties for which rental information had just recently been received. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to set the estimated market value of the three properties as follows: Kyle Feldman/Agent PID 12-116-22 41 0007 $8,122,000 Kyle Feldman/Agent PID 12-116-22 12 0004 $4,985,400 Kyle Feldman/Agent PID 12-116-22 42 0013 $2,955,800 Motion carried unanimously. IV. OTHER BUSINESS There was none. V. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 90-133. ACCEPTING THE 1990 ASSESSMENT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 90-133, Accepting the 1990 Assessment. Motion carried unanimously. VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjourn the meeting at 11:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously. k_. ,J JtpO UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AND PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 6:00 P.M. COUNCILMEMBERS: Gary D. Peterson, Mayor; Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Douglas Tenpas COMMISSION MEMBERS: Bud Baker, Chairperson; Pat Breitenstein, Karon Joyer, David Kuechenmeister, Paul Karpinko, Pat Richard, Del Vanderploeg ABSENT: Pat Breitenstein CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Assistant City Manager Craig Dawson; Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert; Landscape Architect Barbara Penning Cross; Recording Secretary Roberta Wick The meeting convened at 6:05 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. II. Community Center Entry There were two problems with the entrance to the Community Center: (1) The entry to the Center is too narrow and (2) the landscaping is messy. Lambert presented two separate plans for redoing the entrance. Barbara Cross, Landscape Architect, explained the problems with the present design. She said one alternative was to relocate the present entrance and install a brick plaza in place of the landscaping. The cost of doing this would be $276,000. Alternate funding had been suggested by selling bricks with citizens' names on them as well as corporate logos. It would take 13,200 bricks and 105 corporate logos to break even on the cost. The second approach would be to repair the circulation system, which is the biggest problem. A temporary fix would cost $23,369. If all new concrete were installed the cost would be $49,000; exposed concrete would cost $80,000. For the entire street work and entry work the cost would be 'l Unapproved Minutes 2 June 10, 1990 Special Meeting, Eden Prairie City Council and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission $105,000 provided the City crews would do all of the work except the concrete. Staff would like direction on this from the Parks Commission and the Council. Vanderploeg said he liked the plaza design. Joyer liked the design but was concerned about the temporary planning. Baker pointed out that there was no line-of-sight from the door of the building to the car when picking up someone at the Center. Pidcock asked if a model could be done first. Lambert replied that it could be done but it is very time-consuming. Tenpas said he liked the plan with the entire project completed. Anderson asked if this kind of thing should be done at all with all the things that need to be done in the City. He also asked if City should hold another referendum. Lambert said there should be agreement on a plan before anything was done about a referendum. Peterson said he favored the entire project but it would not be a priority for 1990 and it should be in the budget for a later date. All Councilmembers were in agreement with him on this point. I. Capital Improvement Program for Park and Oven Space Plan Bill Morris of Decision Resources reviewed some of the results of a survey done on the satisfaction level of Eden Prairie citizens with the quality of lire and with recreational facilities, and what they saw as being needed in the future. Fifty-two percent considered the quality of life in Eden Prairie excellent; 46 percent said good. Regarding the quality of park facilities, 92 percent said excellent or good. The small parks in the area were used by 70 percent of the Eden Prairie households; 71 percent used the large parks. On the Community Center entry, 80 percent supported changes if they could be done without additional taxes. The evaluations on the recreational facilities in the City were as follows: Small parks - 90 percent said excellent or good; Community Parks - 89 percent said excellent or good; Community Center - 90 percent said excellent or good; 4r Trails - 85 percent said excellent or good. Unapproved Minutes 3 June 10, 1990 Special Meeting, Eden Prairie City Council and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Regarding a possible Miller Park referendum, 53 percent supported it, 35 percent opposed it. Morris pointed out that for a special election the critical thing was how many people go to the polls. Opponents tend to go to the polls on these issues. November of even-numbered years is the best time to present the referendums. Baker asked if the questions with regard to the Miller Park referendum indicated the magnitude of the costs. Morris said no, but it led people to believe that costs would be lower than the last time. Anderson asked if it would be possible to have the referendum include several things in addition to Miller Park. Morris said if the total package was over $50 for each property owner, it would be harder to pass than if it were lower. Richard said he believed that in a good turnout election, the Miller Park Referendum would pass. Lambert reviewed briefly Pages 1466-68 of the agenda materials on planned expenditures. Details were covered in the memorandum dated of May 18. Lambert discussed the issue of power boats and jet skis on Bryant and Riley Lakes. He said he believes some limitations on horsepower will eventually be requested. Lambert asked the Council how it wished to finance the improvements. Pidcock and Anderson suggested more discussions, possibly in work sessions or special sessions. Anderson asked how much time was needed to put the referendum on the ballot. Dawson said six weeks. Lambert said that a formal report from Decision Resources will be ready for the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, for the first meeting in August. Dawson said that the analysis of the Community Survey will be ready in a month Monday, August 6, 1990 was agreed upon for a joint meeting to discuss the remaining items on the agenda. V. ADJOURNMENT } The joint meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7:30 P.M. 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas Tenpas CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Engineer Alan Gray,and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL All members present I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the agenda. Peterson said that on Item IV. B. Village Knolls by Argus Development,the proponent had requested a continuance to the next meeting,July 17. Pidcock added to Item X. A. Reports of Councilmembers, the following: (2) Some observations on recycling in New York; (3) Control of the goose population; 4) Access at Lariat Center. Anderson added the following: (5) July 4 celebration; (6) the storm damage. Motion to approve the agenda as amended carried 5-0. II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday.June 19. 1990 Tenpas moved, seconded by Harris, to approve minutes of June 19. Harris said that on Page 5 of the Minutes, the first paragraph under the Motion, should read: Tenpas moved, Harris seconded that the Council ask Mn/DOT to hold a neighborhood meeting to include Council staff and Council members. Minutes approved as amended 3-2 with Pidcock and Peterson • abstaining because they were absent on June 19. City Council Minutes 2 July 10, 1990 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Authorization to Issue Certificates of Indebtedness for Radio Tower C. Authorize WCC Permit Application for Boulder Pointe Townhomes (Resolution No. 90-176) D. Approval of Final Plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 8th Addition (located at the Northwest corner of Corporate Way and Martin Drive) Resolution No. 90-172 E. Award Contract for I.C. 52-156 Extension of Mitchell Road to County Road #1 (Resolution No. 90-173) F. Joint Cooperation Agreement for CDBG Fiscal Years 1991, 1992, 1993 (Resolution No. 90-177) G. NELSON ADDITION by David Nelson. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 35- 89, Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 2.41 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Nelson Addition; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-162, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 35-89 Ordering Publication of Said Summary. (Ordinance No. 35-89 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-162- Authorizing Summary and Publication) H. BOULDER POINTE WEST TOWNHOMES by David Carlson Companies, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 22-90, Rezoning from R1-22 to RM-6.5 on 8.26 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Boulder Pointe West Townhomes; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-161, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 22-90 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. (Ordinance No. 22-90 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-161 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) I. Summary of Findings on the Proposed Flying Cloud Airport Noise Abatement Plan (Resolution No. 90-171) (Removed from the Agenda) J. Approve Agreement with Mn/DOT for Traffic Signal at Dell Road and T.H. 5 (Resolution No. 90-178) K. Partial Release of Open Space Agreement for Olympic Hills Golf Course MOTION Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Consent Calendar. MOTION Anderson moved that Item I regarding Flying Cloud Aiport be removed from the consent calendar and carried forward to the July P City Council Minutes 3 July 10, 1990 17, 1990 meeting to allow for more discussion. Seconded by Harris. Motion approved 5-0. Motion to approve the Consent calendar as amended approved 5-0. • IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE by Holtze Brothers Development Company. Request for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.6 acres, Zoning District Change from Office and C-Reg to C-Reg-Ser on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres,and preliminary Plat of 7.2 acres into one lot and one outlot for construction of a 220 unit hotel development. Location: Southwest • corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle. (Ordinance No. 23-90-PUD-10-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-165 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from June 19, 1990 Dawson said that notice of the public hearing was sent to owners of 22 surrounding properties and published in the June 7, 1990 issue of Eden Prairie News. The proponent was seeking approval to construct a 220-unit hotel. Peter Beck spoke for the proponent, Holtze Brothers Construction Company. He spoke about the developer, the project, and the one remaining issue on the project which was the exterior building materials. The hotel was designed and marketed for long-term executive stays, from a few days or weeks to several months. Primary marketing concepts were the creation of a comfortable residential environment, and stressing the residential nature of the facility. Beck said there had been agreement with the Planning Commission and Staff on all issues except the exterior building materials. The request was to build this project at 50 percent brick or better, whereas the ordinance guideline was 75 percent brick or better. Originally they had planned to request the project be done completely in wood siding because they believed the siding would make their guests feel as if they were in a residential building. Market studies had shown this to be true and had been a big selling point. This was their reason for bringing this issue before the Council. It was also a cost issue but this was secondary to the marketing issue. Enger said that the Planning Commission reviewed this item at their May 29 meeting and recommended on a 6-0 vote approval of the request for Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development approval based upon plans dated May 9, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated May 25, 1990. The Staff 1 recommended that the development plans be revised to meet City Code requirements for exterior material to reflect warmer colors compatible . J I City Council Minutes 4 July 10, 1990 with adjoining land use within the PUD, and revise the landscaping plan for better screening from Office Ridge Circle. A resolution of the screening issue on Office Ridge Circle but had been reached but staff not received revised plans for parking lot along Office Ridge Circle to be screened according to City Code. The issue was one of exterior materials. Enger cited the instance where Target came to Eden Prairie when there were no brick Target stores in the United States. Target was adamantly opposed to constructing a brick building rather an exposed aggregate. Target believed that exposed aggregate was so identified with its corporate image that it could not change. However, the Eden Prairie Target store was one of the top ten most successful in the United States, even though it was built of brick. Enger gave the Brock Residence Inn as another example of a firm that wished to keep the residential look to their buildings. In this case,the Council held to the ordinance of 75 percent brick or better, bearing in mind that window glass is counted in the 75 percent figure. It was not a visually overbearing amount of brick and was very residential in character. Enger said the City's experience with wood in commercial buildings was that it required a lot of maintenance to keep it looking good. Enger said the Code did not provide for the administration of the 75 percent brick or better to be divided among building elevations or among buildings as suggested by Mr. Beck. In this case,the proponent had chosen to do so in that the outer ring of buildings would be 100 percent wood, and the inner five buildings would be brick and glass. In terms of maintenance, more than half of the project would use material that did not have the durability of brick. Enger added that from a staff and Planning Commission perspective, this was an attractive project. The location was appropriate and a welcome addition to the Eden Prairie Major Center area and the Planning Commission recommended approval. Harris asked Enger what the percentage of brick and wood was on the Fountain Place apartments. Enger replied that the Council approved a 68 percent brick versus wood on that project because the proponent was concerned about the use of brick above four stories. Tenpas asked if the additional material would be wood. Beck said that it was proposed to be wood, but it could be longer-term,more durable material such as vinyl. Pidcock asked if Enger proposed the color should be similar to the Residence Inn. Enger replied that the Planning Commission's objection was to the white wood and the black roof as looking institutional, and that perhaps the proponent may want to look at something that had a warmer appearance than white. City Council Minutes 5 July 10, 1990 Anderson said that he objected to changing the 75 percent brick or better requirement on this project because of the durability of brick and because of Eden Prairie's success with it in commercial developments. Tenpas said he thought this was a good use of the site with the additional landscaping that would be done,and considering the success that this company has had in Denver. He said he would prefer that it not use wood but that the Council should look at other long-lasting materials other than brick. John Hedberg from the Super Valu Stores headquarters said there was a concern about the traffic in the area and asked if any studies had been done. Beck replied that the City had done a traffic analysis. The hotel would generate very little traffic,and it would be primarily off-peak hours so it would not conflict with the office users at Office Ridge Circle or with Super Valu. Harris said she would like to be assured that any other material used is something of long-standing durability. Peterson said he concurred with the Planning Commission, Staff,and Anderson that the requirement for 75 percent brick or better did not mean that the material all had to be brick, but it had to be something comparable. Peterson said he would support the Code as it now stood. Anderson said that decisions that determine which direction the City should go should not be made on one project. His concern was that if changes were made that they be done through a process and not on a project-by-project basis. Peterson asked Enger if the issue of the additional shrubs and conifers had been resolved. Enger replied that the only place where resolution had not been reached was along Office Ridge Circle and the proponent had assured the Planning Commission this will be done. Peterson asked if Enger had had discussion with the proponent regarding vinyl. Enger said he had spoken with Eric Holtze about exterior materials and talked about the possibility of vinyl. What had been proposed was wood, so other products had not been reviewed. Enger suggested some percentage less than 75 percent brick. He suggested the proponent prepare additional drawings to show part brick on each building, and the remaining material be of a durable siding other than wood. Beck said that the one thing that could not be done was to mix materials on the buildings because some buildings were considered hotels and some residences. They would consider vinyl siding on some buildings. City Council Minutes 6 July 10, 1990 There were no additional comments from the audience. Harris moved to continue this item to the July 17, 1990 Council Meeting to offer an opportunity for additional discussion. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0. B. VILLAGE KNOLLS by Argus Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 42.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 8.7 acres. Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single family lots,2 outlots and road right-of-way for a residential development. Location: East of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive. (Resolution No. 90-166 - PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90- 167 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from June 19, 1990 Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas, to continue this item to the July 17, 1990 meeting of the Council as requested by the proponent. Motion approved 5-0. C. BENTEC by Bentec Engineering Corporation. Request for Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review within the Office Zoning District on 1.85 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of a 1900 square foot addition to the Bentec Engineering building. Location: 13050 Pioneer Trail. (Ordinance No. 24-90- Zoning District Amendment) Continued from June 19, 1990 Dawson said notice of this public hearing was sent to owners of 49 surrounding properties and published in the Eden Prairie News. Bob Smith representing Bentec Engineering explained the location and the project. The proposal is to add ends to the building in two locations. Bentec is requesting advanced approval and support to get the permits prior to the Developer's Agreement contingent on the approval of the variance. Enger said this item was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 29, 1990 meeting. It recommended approval 6-0 subject to the plans dated May 24 and staff report dated May 25. The developer must receive approval for the variance from the Board of Appeals prior to proceeding. The variance was for setback from 35 feet down to 18 feet. Peterson asked about the view of the end of the building from Highway 169 and if there was an attempt to do any kind of screening or landscaping. Smith said that the existing woods screened the existing plain brick wall 30 feet above the traveled roadway. There were no additional comments from the audience. 1 City Council Minutes 7 July 10, 1990 MOTION Harris moved that the public hearing be closed and approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 24-90 for Zoning District Amendment and direct the staff to prepare an amendment and develop an agreement incorporating Planning Commission and Staff recommendations. Pidcock seconded. Motion approved 5-0. MOTION Harris moved that the Council grant early grading and building permits to the proponent contingent upon the proponent obtaining the necessary variances with the understanding that the proponent proceed prior to the second reading at his own risk. Pidcock seconded. Motion approved 5-0. D. CHI CHI'S RESTAURANT by Consul Restaurant Corporation. Request for Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, within the overall Preserve Commercial Park North Planned Unit Development and Zoning District amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 2.23 acres and Site Plan Review on 2.23 acres for construction of an additional parking lot for Chi Chi's Restaurant. Location: Prairie Center Drive and Crystal View Road. (Ordinance No. 25-90-PUD-11-90- PUD District and Zoning District Amendment. Dawson said that Chi Chi's sought three approvals in order to add 36 stalls on property currently under construction as Chi Chi's restaurant. Notice of the public hearing was property send to owners of the surrounding properties and published in the Eden Prairie News. Enger said that the current site plan provided all the parking required by City Code. The proposal was to give the ability to add 36 spaces on property owned by Ed Flaherty. The Planning Commission had recommended approval. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION Pidock moved that the public hearing be closed and the first reading of Ordinance No. 25-90-PUD-11-90 for PUD District and Zoning District Amendment be approved. Tenpas seconded. Motion approved 5-0. City Council Minutes 8 July 10, 1990 MOTION Pidcock moved that Council direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and staff recommendations. Tenpas seconded. Motion approved 5-0. E. VACATION OF 90-06 - VACATION OF DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN LOTS 11 & 12. BLOCK 3. YORKSHIRE POINT (Resolution No. 90-174) Dawson stated that notices of this public hearing were properly mailed and published. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION Pidcock moved that the public hearing be closed and Resolution 90- 174 for vacation of the easements be approved. Tenpas seconded. Motion approved 5-0. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Anderson moved the payment of claims, seconded by Pidcock. Peterson questioned Item 60732 on Page 1599, the lightning damage to the computer at the Police Department and asked whether this was not covered by insurance. Dawson said that there was a high deductible on this policy which is cumulative through the year and this would be applied to the deductible. Roll Call vote: Anderson, Harris, Pidcock, Tenpas, and Peterson all voting "AYE". VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Receive petition and authorize preparation of a feasibility study to consider utility and street improvements for Staring Lane and Ridge Road and Vicinity, I.E. 52-203 (Resolution No. 90-175) Dawson stated that additional signatures to the petition had been received from the residents of this area for utility and roadway improvements. The petition had been signed by more than 35 percent of the residents with frontage in the area. If the Council eventually adopted a resolution ordering the improvements rquested, it could be approved with three votes instead of four, which would be necessary when less than 35 percent of the residents petitioned for such a City Council Minutes 9 July 10, 1990 request. At this point the request was for a feasibility study to look at the technical issues and costs. LeRoy Heitz, 9281 East Staring Lane, spoke against the improvements, stating that the cost to his property would be approximately $18,000. He viewed this cost as being prohibitive inasmuch as he already had working, environmentally-safe water and sewer systems. He believed that the Fire Department would be able to handle a fire in the area. Peterson asked Pauly what the options were when the Council received a valid petition. Pauly said that the action tonight was not to order in the work but to order a feasibility study, so the Council had the discretion to do so regardless of the number of people signing the petition. Harris asked Dietz if the costs quoted by Mr. Heitz were what could be expected for each resident. Dietz replied that there is a policy that limited special assessments to$15,000. Added to that was the cost to make the connection from the street to the house, and Mr. Heitz's $3000 estimate was close. Dietz said he had advised the residents that the Council had instituted a five-year exclusion policy for utilities, that the initial assessment would be only for streets and storm sewer. He had also advised the property owners that at this time the City did not have a policy requiring a connection at any point as long as their system was working. If the system were to fail, they would be required to hook up. So far the petition has been signed by 40.6 percent of the residents. Jim Peterson, 9161 E. Staring Lane,spoke in favor of the water, sewer and blacktop street. Gale Olson, 9051 E. Staring Lane, also spoke in favor of the improvements, stating that he believed he had inadequate fire protection at the present time. Sherri Heitz, 9281 E. Staring Lane, said there were several of the neighbors in the area who would be in danger of losing their houses because they would be unable to pay for the assessments for these improvements. Anderson asked what the policy was for retired persons. Dietz said there was a senior citizens deferment of all special assessments. Mr. Heitz asked that if City water and sewer should go in but a person had a lot that could be divided,and the owner chose to keep it, would the owner have to pay the special assessments for each portion. Peterson said that the assessments would be made at the time of the sale. Deitz said that if there were additional development potential beyond one lot, that assessment be would be deferred until development. Dietz pointed out that this matter was not a public hearing and it was only to consider the feasibility study. He also pointed out that the f %. City Council Minutes 10 July 10, 1990 life expectancy of a utility system is between 50-70 years and the life expectancy of a septic tank was about 20 years. Initially there may be some higher costs for utilities, but in the long run the utilities would be there longer. Pidcock moved that a feasibilty study be prepared for this area. Seconded by Harris. Motion approved 5-0. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS. BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. Summer Vacation Schedules for Councilmembers (continued from June 19, 1990) Dawson said that this request was made because there may be actions this summer requiring four votes and staff could schedule these items when all members would be present. Anderson said he may possibly be gone for the first meeting in August. Pidcock said she would be absent for the second meeting in August. She will be out of town August 16-29.Harris said she would be absent for the first meeting in November. 2. Recycling Pidcock said that on a recent trip to New York, she was impressed with its good recycling program, and would like to see such a thing in Eden Prairie. 3. Goose Control Pidcock said that she noted that Chanhassen has a good program for control of the goose population,and would like to know if Eden Prairie had a policy for such a purpose. Dawson replied that there was a policy adopted last year; that if there were a request from a resident or a business to have geese removed, and if there was consent from the neighbors in the area, Dr. Cooper at the University would be contacted and would do the removal. It was essentially done on an as-needed basis. 4. Access at Lariat Center Pidcock also talked about the traffic turns at Lariat Center. She said she had had a lot of complaints from merchants because there is only one way to get in there by Applebee's. Peterson said the road will eventually be extended to Franlo. Pidcock said that since MnDOT had cut off the southern exit on Hwy. 169 there City Council Minutes 11 July 10, 1990 was only one way in. Deitz said that construction should be completed this summer. Deitz also said that the traffic consultant had analyzed the area when Applebee's came through and decided that it would not be desirable to have another full intersection that close to Hwy. 169 because it would not be safe or effective. Deitz said there may be some TIF money available to remedy this situation. 5. July 4 Event Anderson stated that he thought this year was the biggest and best Fourth of July celebration the Lity had ever had and that the Council should commend all those who had a part in it. MOTION Anderson moved that the City Council commend the Park and Recreation Department, Staff, Maintenance Department,for the fine job done on the Fourth of July celebration and the upkeep and maintenance of the park. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 5-0. 6. Storm Damage Anderson spoke about the damaged trees and debris caused by the last storm. The City should make it known that residents who had tree damage could set their trees out and the City would pick it up if they called to request it. Peterson suggested that a notice to this effect could appear occasionally in Happenings. B. Report of City Manager 1. Dawson said that an organizational directory has been provided as requested by some Councilmembers. Also a VHS copy of the video study that was done on the landfill has been provided. 2. A safety camp was being put on by the Police and Fire Departments starting July 9 and continuing through July 11. All Council members were invited to attend. 3. On Thursday afternoon July 12 there was a welcoming ceremony planned for the Eden Prairie Soccer Tournament at 5 p.m. at the High School soccer field. A Soviet youth soccer team would be here. Council approval to present a Key to the City was requested. MOTION Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, that a Key to the City be presented to the visiting Soviet soccer team. Motion approved 5-0. City Council Minutes 12 July 10, 1990 I C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation and Natural Resources F. Report of Director of Public Works XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Tenpas motioned to adjourn at 9:40p.m. Seconded by Anderson. Motion approved 5-0. • { r � ,v EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 17, 1990 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Barris, Patricia Pidcock, and Douglas Tenpas. COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Planning Chris Roger, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Diets, and Recording Secreatary Rebecca Brasys. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Peterson presented commendations to those City departments responsible for the July 4 celebration. P t to receive commendations were Laurie Belling of the Recreation staff; Stu Fox, Parks Maintenance staff; Rob Reynolds, Police Department; and members of the Police Reserves. MOTION Anderson moved, Pidcock seconded to approve the agenda as published and amended. AMENDMENTS Jullie added the following items to the Consent Calendar: G. Resolution 90-184 granting site plan approval for the Chi Chi parking lot expansion. H. Resolution 90-185 Final Plat approval for Bluffs East 7th Addition. I. Resolution 90-186 Cooperative Construction agreement with MnDOT for the TH5 project from CR 4 over to Dell Road. Item IIID, he stated, was to be removed from the consent calendar as more time was required to address the concerns over noise problems. Anderson added Item X.A.2, River Bluff Erosion. Pidcock had several items she wished to discuss under Item I.A.I. Harris requested that Item I.B.1 be moved to X.A.3. She also added Item I.A.4 relating to several items on which the staff had submitted memoranda. Motion carried unanimously. • { CITY COUNCIL MEETING -2- JULY 17, 1990 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Authorize Release of Land from Special As t Agreement for Extension of Dell Road through Wyndham Knoll and Hidden Glen 4th Addition. C. Approve Plans and Specifications for T.H. 5 from County Road 4 Westerly City Limits, I.C. 52-135 (Resolution No. 90-179) D. Summary of Findings on the Proposed Flying Cloud Airport Noise Abatement Plan (Resolution No. 90-171) Continued from July 10, 1990 (removed from agenda) Jullie stated this item was removed as more time was required to address the concern over noise regulations. E. Request from Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Clubs, Inc. to amend the Construction Schedule in the Development Agreement Peterson asked if the granting of an extension for this project automatically permitted modifications included in the proponent's letter. Sugar responded the purpose of the letter was to ask the Council to extend the dates in the developer's agreement, while indicating what they would be requesting in the future. F. JAMESTOWN PUD by Tandem Properties. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 3-90-PUD-1-90, Rezoning from Rural and R1-22 to R11-6.5 on 12.16 acres from Rural to R1-13.5 on 17.7 acres and from Rural to R1-22 on 15.7 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Jamestown PUD; Adoption of Resolution No. 90-180, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 3-90-PUD-1-90 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-181, Site Plan Review for 17 condominium units within Jamestown PUD. Location; S..u1.11 of Highway 5, East of West 184th Avenue. (Ordinance No. 3-90-PUD-1-90 - Zoning and PUD District; Resolution No. 90-180-Authorizing Summary and Publication; Resolution No. 90-181 - Site Plan Review) G. Resolution 90-184 Granting Site Plan Approval for the Chi Chi Parking Lot Expansion. H. Resolution 90-195 Final Plat Approval for Bluffs East 7th Addition. I. Resolution 90-186 Cooperative Construction Agreement with NnDOT for the T.H.5 project from County Road 4 to Dell Road. MOTION Anderson moved, Pidcock seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -3- JULY 17, 1990 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE by Holtze Brothers Development Company. Request for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.6 acres, Zoning District Change from Office and C-Reg to C-Reg-Ser on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.2 acres into one lot and one outlot for construction of a 220 unit hotel development. Location: Southwest corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle. (Ordinance No. 23-90-PUD-10-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-165 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from July 10, 1990. Jullie stated this matter was continued from the July 10 meeting due to a difference of opinion regarding the exterior building materials. Staff and the proponents had since met to review the proposal and reached a compromise. Peter Beck, representing Holtze Brothers, stated the compromise called for some brick on all eleven buildings. The siding material, he explained, would be the highest quality vinyl siding with a 50-year warranty and would be permanent and maintenance-free. In terms of design, Mr. Beck stated the proposal was to put a brick base on the outer six buildings which would raise the brick-or-better portion of those buildings to approximately 311. The remaining 4 hotel buildings would be 88% brick or better with the clubhouse being 1001 brick-or- better, for a total project basis of approximately 56% brick-or- better on the exterior wall surfaces. This compromise was acceptable and supported by staff and by the developer and was appropriate, according to Mr. Beck, in the unique circumstances with respect to this project and this piece of property. Also, he added, this project was distinguishable from similar situations because it would be a portion of a larger PUD, the balance of which was done in 100% redwood siding. Mr. Beck thought this solution was compatible with the balance of the PUD, with this particular area of town, and was justified due to • the needs of a unique project. Peterson stated the renderings presented appeared to show an exterior color other than the stark white originally proposed. Beck responded that the siding would be white, with the brick base being white or beige. Enger stated staff met with the proponents at the Council's request to find a compromise for the exterior materials being something less than required by City code. Staff's insisted that there be some brick on the exterior buildings to tie them into the center buildings in the project as well as the existing buildings in the surrounding 1 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING -4- JULY 17, 1990 PUD. The selection of the lighter beige brick color should tie nicely with the 100% redwood siding on the small office buildings directly to the east. Staff believed the addition of brick to the base of the exterior buildings would help bridge the two types of buildings in the project. The overall brick- or-better material would be 56%. Enger stated that staff could not vouch for the siding material chosen, but the manufacturer had a 50-year guarantee. Also, he explained, the siding was a solid, extruded PVC material and ought to be very durable. He believed this to be a good compromise that would fit the Holtse's program very nicely, as well as the programs for the City of Eden Prairie and the immediate PUD. He recommended approval of this proposal. Peterson asked Eager to review the percentages of brick-or- better for this project. He also asked if staff, because of this project's proximity to other all-wood buildings, believed this compromise would make the project more compatible and cohe • He further asked if Mr. Eager was concerned that allowing this compromise would set a precedent. Enger responded that the six outer buildings would have 69% of the exterior as vinyl siding and trim with 31% as window glass and brick. The four inner hotel buildings would be 88% brick and glass with stair towers located above entrances that would be clapboard vinyl siding. The introduction of clapboard siding on the interior of the project would help bridge those buildings to the outside buildings which would be predominantly the white siding. The clubhouse would be 100% brick and glass. He believed this compromise made for a such stronger project internally. Some of the buildings to the east of this project were 100% redwood, and buildings slightly further east were 100% brick. This project, he explained, used both materials in a way that fit the Holtxe's program which was how the staff dealt with the matter of precedent. He believed this proposal fit well with precedent because the proponents presented design criteria to substantiate the waiver. He did not think the City would be open to challenges if this were allowed. Anderson expressed concern over the use of synthetic products on the hotel buildings and asked if the vinyl siding material mat fire codes. Paul Madson, project architect, responded the ignition rate for this PVC material is at 850 degrees compared to 420 degrees for wood products. There were no further comments from the audience. CITY COUNCIL MEETING -5- JULY 17, 1990 NOTION Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to close the public hearing and approve first reading of Ordinance 23-90-PUD-10-90 for PUD district review and rezoning, and adopt Resolution 90-165 approving the preliminary plat. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Anderson voting No. Pidcock moved, Harris seconded, to direct staff to prepare a development agreement incorporating the Commission and staff recommendations. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Anderson voting No. Anderson explained that he still had concerns with this project's effect on City code and its possible precedent. If the Council was considering making changes to City code, that should be done with review by the Commissions and staff with all options to be considered. Pidcock explained she did not have a problem with this proposal because of the existing wood-sided buildings in close proximity. B. VILLAGE KNOLLS by Argus Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 42.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 8.7 acres. Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single-family lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for a residential development. Location: East of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive. (Resolution No. 90-166 - PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-167 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from July 10, 1990. Jullie stated this item was continued from the previous meeting as there was some concern due to the proximity of this project to the Flying Cloud sanitary landfill and the proposed expansion. The Council had received letters of testimony from Dr. Hertzman and Dr. Garry which expressed their concern about the proximity issue. Jullie recommended the Council continue this item to the second meeting in August and direct staff to look at the potential for creating an area for a moratorium on development. Peterson stated it would be difficult for him to participate in an open discussion of the merits of the health experts' recommendations when the Council was in the process of litigation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -6- JULY 17, 1990 Pauly questioned whether a continuance would extend final Council action beyond the 120 day statuatory time period in which the Council is required to respond to the proponent's request. After some discussion between staff and the proponent, the proponent agreed to the continuance. There were no further comments from the audience. NOTION Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to direct staff to explore the possibility of a moratorium to determine whether or not there should be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan as it applied to a specific area within some distance of the landfill, and to continue this item to August 21, 1990 meeting. Anderson asked if the study would be for just this particular parcel or for the entire area. Peterson responded the study would include the entire area. Tenpas asked the staff to provide the Council members with its recommendations as quickly as possible to give them ample time for review. Motion carried unanimously. C. ANDERSON LAKES CENTER 2ND ADDITION (Eden Pairie Post Office) by William S. Railing. Request for a Zoning District Change from Rural to Office and Site Plan Review on 5.4 acres, Preliminary Plat of 13.3 acres into 3 lots and 3 outlots for construction of a 46,598 square foot U.S. Post Office. Location: West of Highway #169, East of the Columbine Road/Garden Lane intersection. (Ordinance No. 26-90; Resolution No. 90-183) Jullie stated notice of this hearing was properly mailed to surrounding property owners and published in the Eden Prairie News. Brian Marshall, representing the U.S. Postal Service, stated the Postal Service currently had an option on this site contingent on Council approval of the zoning change and plat approval. This would be a full service post office, he explained, with city and rural delivery, retail window service, lockbox rental, etc. Plans called for 51 employees to work in this facility, with the 46,000 square foot building to be completed in spring, 1992. Hours of operation would be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Mr. Marshall explained this site was selected after careful evaluation and that the Postal Service was negotiating with an architectural engineering firm to adapt the CITY COUNCIL MEETING -7- JULY 17, 1990 standard plans to this particiular site. The U.S. Postal Service hoped to award the contract in the next two weeks with the construction contract to be awarded in early 1991. The total project cost, he added, was estimated to be $4.4 million. Eager stated the Plan Commission recommended approval of this project subject to staff recommendations as outlined in the June 22nd staff report. This situation, he explained, was a little different in that the Council did not have detailed plans to illustrate specifically what the exterior elevations of the building would be. He referred to a letter from the Postal Service supplied by Mr. Marshall that referred to the Federal Supremacy Act as it related to local governmental bodies; it was the policy of the U.S. Postal Service to comply with local zoning ordinances to the extent practicable and feasible, but the Postal Service would not pay building permit fees. Eager recommended the Council approve first reading of the rezonining ordinance and that final details be presented to the Planning Commission for review of building elevations, material samples and colors, prior to Council consideration of the second reading. Teepee stated that Eden Prairie prided itself on its standards and regulations for building exteriors. He was concerned that the Postal Service comply with those regulations. Mr. Marshall stated the site plan incorporated all the suggestions made by the Planning staff with regards to the building exterior. Peterson asked if the fencing question had been resolved. Enger explained that the fence would provide screening of the loading and parking area from Hwy. 169, and that the landscaping plan would tone down the fence. Lloyd Cherne stated this parcel was located adjacent to the Railing property and his property was just beyond the Roiling parcel. He was concerned about gaining access for his parcel to Hwy. 169 and asked if the road the Postal Service is proposing could be extended through to provide that access. After some discussion, the Council determined this should be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to second reading. There were no further comments from the audience. MOTION Anderson moved, Harris seconded to close the public hearing and adopt the first reading of Ordinance 26-90 for rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. Anderson moved, Harris seconded to adopt Resolution 90-183 approving the preliminary plat. Motion carried unanimously. ✓. CITY COUNCIL MEETING -8- JULY 17, 1990 D. AMENDMENT TO THE BUILDING HEIGHT ORDINANCE (Chapter 11 of the City Code) Ordinance No. 18-90 Section 1103, Subdivision 28. Jullie stated notice of this hearing was properly published. Be explained that the staff and advisory commissions have had increasing difficulty reconciling the building height regulations with the architecture and construction techniques found today. This proposed amendment would make the definitions more workable without compromising the intent of the zoning code. Both the Plan Commission and Board of Appeals had reviewed the proposed ordinance and recommended approval. There were no further comments from the audience. MOTION Anderson moved, Pidcock seconded to close the public hearing and approve the first reading of Ordinance 18-90 regulating building height. Motion carried unanimously. E. REFINANCING OF MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING BONDS FOR EDEN INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,700,000 (Resolution No. 90-182). Jullie explained Eden Investment Partnership, owners of the Eden Glen Apartments, were requesting refinancing of $2.7 million in housing revenue bonds which the City issued for this project. Federal law requires a public hearing be held for refinancing of this kind. He recommended adoption of Resolution 90-182. Pidcock asked if the people who bought these bonds would get less of a benefit from the lower interest rate as a result of the refinancing. She was concerned because the City recently refinanced bonds for special is that property owners were paying, the City kept the higher interest rate on the property owners while paying a lower interest rate. Jullie explained that such an issue came up with the tax increment financing districts. When the issue of the remaining special assessments to be collected came to the staff's attention, there was some discussion and questions by property owners. However, the City's policy had been not to adjust interest rates after assessments had been levied. Pauly explained there was no authority for the City to the special cent interest rate once it was set. There were no further comments from the audience. MOTION Harris moved, Anderson seconded to close the public hearing and adopt Resolution 90-182. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MEETING -9- JULY 17, 1990 V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS NOTION Anderson moved, Harris seconded to approve payment of claims. Motion carried unanimously. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND CO/MISSIONS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Anderson stated the area directly to the southeast of the landfill area where the washout occurred there is a tremendous amount of erosion because motorcycles and four wheel drive vehicles have stripped the vegetation and top soil. He did not believe the City should allow the erosion of this area to continue. • Teapas was concerned about the legality of the Council taking action on this property as it was in private ownership. MOTION Anderson moved, Pidcock seconded that the Parks and Recreation Staff prepare a proposal to be reviewed by Mr. Pauly and then presented to the Council in three weeks. MISCE►rANEOUS NATTERS a. Pidcock suggested the City have available more than just two or three sets of keys to the city. b. Pidcock stated because of the numerous accidents on Scenic Heights Road where the road narrows down and curves by the school property, she would like to see the speeds posted for 20 ailes per hour at that location. c. Pidcock asked what the status was on the number of liquor licenses which could yet be issued by the City and was informed there were about six remaining. d. Pidcock asked whet had been done about the four-foot-high weeds behind Ciatti's. Jullie stated he would look into it. e. Pidcock asked what was being done with respoct to the correspondence from Hennepin County Commissioner Randy Johnson. Jullie explained that Mr. Johnson would be f requesting time on an upcoming Council agenda. CITY COUNCIL MEETING -10- JULY 17, 1990 3. CITY MANAGER'S PERFORMANCE REVIEW Peterson stated he and Ms. Harris met with the City Manager to review the 3.93 scoring on his performance review and recommended • 6% salary increase effective January 1, 1990. MOTION Tenpas moved, Pidcock seconded to approve a 6% salary increase for the City Manager effective January 1, 1990. Motion carried unanimously. Harris stated prior to the City Managers review, the Council had discussed the possibility of setting goals for the City Manager. She suggested the Council review the goals prepared by Mr. Jullie which the Council agreed to do at the upcoming special meeting. 4. DISCUSSION OF MEMORANDA a. Harris commended the Waste Management Commission on its memo relating to a City composting facility. She asked what the status was regarding the chipping service recommended by the Commission and what access the City residents had to the County's compost sites. Dawson stated Eden Prairie residents had access to sites in Maple Grove and Shakopee. He added the chipping service required further analysis. Anderson stated that composting and leaf recycling opportunities did not meet the needs of those people with ■ lots of large trees on their lot as they must make spacial arrangements for pickup. He felt a questionnaire should be sent to homeowners to see if their needs were being met. b. Harris asked that report on the proposed expansion of the water supply and system be placed on a future agenda. c. Harris referred to the feasibility study on the Singletree Lane building for City Hall and indicated she was not very enthusiastic about this site after having reviewed the study. After some discussion, the Council decided to hold a special meeting to discuss this issue. • ,tJ i 4 J • • CITY COUNCIL MEETING -11- JULY 17, 1990 D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 1. Discussion on MUSA expansion Eager stated about two months ago the Council received • request from Dick Feerick for expansion of the MUSA line in three different phases each consisting of forty-acre increments. This included the Schroers and Jacques properties south of Hwy. 5 and west of Mitchell Lake and was referred to the staff for review. The staff's June 20th memo listed the Council's options and the rationale that the staff explored for each option. Rs explained Eden Prairie had an adequate supply of land for development within the MUSA line and within southwest Eden Prairie. He referred to five recently approved projects that represented several hundred proposed housing units in southwest Eden Prairie which would take three to five years to develop. However, expansion of the MUSA line would increase the supply of land for large parcel, tract development and this addition of land to the MUSA line would simplify the process of extending utilities and roads into that area as far as how the assessment method works. Eager stated the staff analysis supported a MUSA line • extension in the 200-to 900-acre range according to the Metropolitan Council criteria. The Council could add this • land in piecemeal fashion as requests were received, he • explained, but a better option would be to add all the land north of County Road 1 (317 acres). County Road 1 would provide a logical breaking point and the 317 acres would facilitate an easier assessment method for Dell Road, Scenic Heights Road, and the sanitary sewer/water and storm sewer. MOTION Tenpas moved, Pidcock seconded to initiate a Comprehensive Guide Plan change for the 317 acres north of County Road 1 to be included in the MUSA line. Motion carried unanimously. XI. NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Tenpas moved, Anderson seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9t23 p.m. t.k., CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST August 7, 1990 CONTRACTDR (MULIT-FAMILY & comm.) GAS FITTER B & E Construction, Inc. Cronstrom's Heating & Air Conditioning Nordic Steel, Inc. Wm. F. Ridler Plumbing & Heating Quality Pools Southtown Plumbing, Inc. S & B Partners Ward Heating & Air Conditioning Sunram Landscape HEATING & VENTILATING CONTRACTDR (1 & 2 FAMILY) Cherokee Refrigeration, Inc. Cronstrom's Heating & Air Conditioning Encore Design ,& Remodeling Wm. F. Ridler Plumbing & Heating Great Scapes,Inc. Ward Heating & Air Conditioning Hybrid Enterprises, Inc. Wend Service Company Imperial Siding & Remodeling Co. King Homes MECHANICAL GAMES Gene Mace Construction McCallum Construction, Inc. American Amusement Arcades Don McMahon Construction, Inc. Neighborhood Building & Remodeling TYPE C FOOD Mark Seavall Homes Dean Semmer-Remodeling Fina Serve, Inc. Tampa, Inc. Wagner Building & Design CIGARETTE PLUMBING Fina Serve, Inc. ABC Plumbing PEDDLER June Plumbing & Heating Ricky Allen Kirschbaum (firewood) GAMBLING John Richard Boser (firewood) Eden Prairie Legion (Bingo Hall) with waiver of 60 day waiting period) These licenses have been approved by the department heads resnonsible for the licensed activity. lsat Soi ie Licensing f I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 18-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 11, BY (1) AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF "BUILDING HEIGHTS" IN SECTION 11.02, 8., (2) AMENDING SECTION 11.03, SUBD. 2. B. NUMBERING THE TABLES AND INCREASING THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF MAIN STRUCTURES ALLOWED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND (3) ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 11.02, 8. is hereby amended to read as follows: 8. "Building Height" - Is the vertical distance above a reference datum measured to the highest point of the coping of the highest flat roof or to the deck line of the highest mansard roof or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. The reference datum shall be selected by either of the following, whichever yields a greater height of building: (a) The elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within a 5 foot horizontal distance of the exterior wall of the building when such sidewalk or ground surface is not more than 10 feet above lowest grade. (b) An elevation 10 feet higher than the lowest grade when the sidewalk or ground surface described in (a) above is more than 10 feet above lowest grade. The height of a stepped or terraced building is the maximum height of any segment of the building. Section 2. City Code Section 11.03, Subd. 2. B. is amended to read as follows: B. The following criteria shall apply to all Districts: • Table 1 § I.l.n3 r t o 7q A a v 1 41I gyp P O O' O v .fl 0 A 0 P: .1 >. •4 T .i >. •.• . •.. >. .ti >, X O 0 II4 4 4 4 4 ,n 0.In. O IV 0 v ti 0 %1 0In.r 0 A..1 qq L. \ \ \ \ .1 P: :1 Y .as . 2 1. 3:F.�=K— Z Z Z Z .VI ^�,VI O N O F.IA o u1 O F u0l e 0 • aNaa • O 1 4, Cl.O a.d..n Cp if .-1 U I.. . . Y Jf y 14 •„ .11 14�: M 0 A ppp A 14 4),t•.1 4 1. 1 17 ❑OIA P APN N. A A A 4.1 IT I: Z P. d. P. P. P. O.0 P As Os H,a M rn N al C II 0,.1 • 1, O 0 0 0 a O 0 A.1 as I..4 4 O a 0 0 00 al aUI•.. • 0 • , 1, Insrs In.>'A PN O . N .1 CI o N IC 41 a+ 0 0 .A 0 0 p O (4 F. In M N N N N M 14 CI FmF w .o m UI F 0 • 0 QN III 0•.1 Nn 0 mad. ,n O o N as • M M N nl 41 Os N In ,.... • F1 n • NP4I . E a0 ° 0lO : ..1 .1 II u r N1r P. 0 .-1 1/101 CO COL as N F Cisa 0 in Cl.F. 0 0 10•1 0 el h 4 i v ii. • p o .n o po p 41• N A f.1 N1 1 r1 C .I 0 O I 9/ 4: N ((�� O 'q • 0 0 0 In 0 0 O1.. C O n.s a in 6 41 0en 0 Cl 01 N an 13 r: 9 0 a ,,0 O :L r...1 1 I, n. i7 A L' k YI A A In q 1 n S ��- . co h Z O O O p N O �: A f 1 4 0 0 in 0 O ,wWII �. .;1•w 11 p N cn • 0 1II •C n 0.0 f 1• .1 .I �1 in P❑I•. --...... nl U 4 f''l E•In o N A FG .1 o n M In nl II ow c4 1 1 I 1 � N 11 QI a rat n al w a I,s; ,/il,)I 'i (4-3n-B4) 6 i Table 2 ( § 11.03 1 c e 0. A N N u 'Ti Z Z Z ..a C U C 0 ul 10.3 0' u C v•" C N .1 I.n \ \ \ N. \ \ U A 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z >. o In a C N .. U I"Ill II C la ++ w I. 1 UI U U . Y. C V p •L N U u y� y1 N N N ix n .4 .d .a .a .. .1 a 4 n.4 all O HN g Y N .i C1 .0 N U1 In 4• 1 1 1 I 1 id Cy a a X a n o ( (4-30-84 110 Table 3 S 11.03 A 4. C C _N - NM 2 d 11 • P.G1C • N N N O O p C 9C • *Viol L. c _O o��a -o :off *poi a _y efi . eN NIONo=NI ocloN N� oN a! e C N YL Cl CI EE c' xo .). = o o WU Nf GaNO D3Y G.2, f OiY Ys: V Y V. G O: Y . A c.12 It 12 I_ 1 _ LL Y • G N p V. :le. 1g I2 I° 1� p°: O 5. x Iw U • C F• _ 10 GI O ti w c v a+ .c It i u u iN o`i .. N M1 lQ 0 4 ` W Y u 51 1 (9-17-82) • ' NN1 Table 4 ( §11.07 H e.a�:Et C O o i � " -N� .I =• --• Isn1 eeo? �o2a� a e= - •r.. 4 r'r ..r - \ ii rra; : all u , + - 12 N ! . r s\ \ I \ : � s i_ijo 1 2 • \2 12 Ia I = � \ Ir 1 \ I :.\ - 6 1 " 1 S.:• .\ . M I'd 1 \ 2 \F. . f... I. C `1 L .` 0 4I . Y \ x \V. \ V \ _ 4 4111\ ! z.1^ \ rt (9-17-82) * Source: Ordinance No. 9-87 Effective Date: 5-6-87 . ./( i 1 Table 5 5 11.03 • I • I a I 1 I j 1 f 0 1 a n 1 1 • 1 x� : ;= 0 = i 1 I ; I In N 2 2 i \ I \ 1 \ ` • I 1 1 8 I (. 0 0 0 1 1 • aI - \ a a a \ \ \ I C 1L.4L=V1 N 0 1 aN \2 . 2 . I \ \ 1 I 1 • VI • Y C Y u U \ tia a \ I 1 S. S. \ N.` ` N N r 2 IrIrSr • 1 . a I i ; Al u• u C C O e i.N.( U .. N NN .. C v I .1I 2 I \. • • I CO3I C O .. u 1 a ▪.1 .11 N N N 0 . 0 UU N. N. N. N u N IA u L v L Y • E I I• A 1 1 .y N V a N N r N 101 O N ..1 N i• i• H Y Y Y Y L ' U �I H i• I >. ). I >. t . "I Y Y CZ I • •C �� qS - a aa0 IN 0 aaZO . $ 7 . . . . q N N NH N .+ u II • 1 • t Ie � -.- uo. a coI T O N N..I .7 a N N N J N IN I N an tNN U U -' t t -• w ". en. ^ o o I a a I • 1 + • n • U C I Y Y I I • \ .U. r U - I t a) N C w c 7 0 C V U a t • o u r s - v u u I u 4I a r ' 1 (9-17-32) l )Q . Section 3. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violations a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective from and after passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of May, 1990 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1990. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1990. II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNEOSOTA RESOLUTION ND. 90-189 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the following persons have agreed to serve as election judges and are appointed for the Primary Election to be held on September 11, 1990. PRECINCT 1A KING OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH TT850-6uEET keTraiT 934-1708 Ruth Ehlen 6630 Lochanburn Road 934-9464 Ken Hookom 16741 Prairie Lane 934-2550 Philip Olson 18543 Harrogate Drive 934-5353 JoAnn Wronski ** 6630 Tartan Curve 934-4226 PRECINCT 18 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 16700—Valley View Road 937-8727 Judith Baker ** 7113 Muirfield Lane 937-2153 Dolores Brown 7260 Tartan Curve 934-0848 Anne Hawkins 18099 South Shore Lane West 934-2253 William Jellison 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 PRECINCT 2 EOEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 16591 Duck Lake Trail 934-2327 Loretta Ellison 16920 South Shore Lane 934-3060 Allene Hookom 16741 Prairie Lane 934-2550 Delores Klein 15701 North Lund Road 934-9124 Kathleen Porta ** 15612 Sunset Circle 934-6634 PRECINCT 3 EDEN PRAIRIE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH 17200—VaTTey View Road 937-9593 Fay Clark ** 7392 Ontario Boulevard 934-4460 Adeline Levin 6743 Hallmark Drive 937-1709 Mary Upton 16163 Edenwood Drive 937-2938 Ethyl Wokasch 15129 Lesley Lane 937-8802 PRECINCT 4 ST. ANDREW LUTHERAN CHURCH T4T00 Valley View Roar 937-2776 Priscilla Bailey 6950 Mariann Drive 937-8885 Gertrude Dahlberg 6319 St. John's Drive 937-1299 Ruth Mital ** 12762 Gordon Drive 944-3481 Alice Schultz 6325 St. John's Drive 937-8171 ( /7i.K Res. No. 90-189 Page 2 PRECINCT 5A IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 16515 Luther Way 937-8123 Bernice Holasek 10020 Dell Road 934-1185 Joyce Myhre ** 15011 Sumnerhill Drive 937-2815 Alfred Nelson 16300 Hilltop Road 937-8941 Melody Villars 7616 Carnelian Lane 934-0448 PRECINCT 5B IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH 16515 Luther Way 937-3123 Margaret Berntsen Shirley Carlon 7900 Timber Lake Drive, #215 934-2966 Elaine Jacques 9021 Riley Lake Road 445-1961 Shirley Jellison ** 9560 Highview Drive 934-0934 David Knaak 7935 South Bay Curve 934-0324 PRECINCT 6 EDEN PRAIRIE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 1505Dic Heights Road 937-8781 Betty Fritz 8226 Tamarack Trail 937-2480 Virginia Gartner ** 15769 Cedar Ridge Road 937-1595 Kathlyn Nicholson 16201 Hilltop Road 937-1928 Marie Wittenberg 9880 Crestwood Terrace 934-0961 PRECINCT 7A NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH 1290r Roberts rbrive 941-7290 Louise Doughty 13200 Roberts Drive 941-2337 Lyle Johnston 8621 Basswood Road, #18 944-9308 Les LaBore ** 14366 Fairway Drive 937-2462 Laurie Pennebaker 7284 Prairie View Drive 937-2623 PRECINCT 7B HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 9200 Flying Cloud Drive 944-9993 Connie 81ad 14315 Sorrel Way 949-0500 Juliet Gleason 8633 Darnel Road 944-6154 Viola McLain 14224 Chestnut Drive 937-1798 Jim Rannow ** 16316 Lincoln Lane 937-8237 PRECINCT 8 EDEN PRAIRIE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 11609 eT ona Road 941-2521 Pauline Johnston 8621 Basswood Road, #18 944-9308 Marion Nesbitt 8701 Black Maple Drive 941-2387 �r Carole Sheridan 8908 Neill Lake Road, #F 944-6643 4. Barb Vanderploeg ** 8735 Leeward Circle 941-5363 Res. No. 90-189 Page 3 PRECINCT 9A PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH 1210b PioneerTrail 941-3150 Bernadine Beauvais 10285 Amsden Way 941-8152 Barbara Cail ** 9205 Talus Circle 941-5140 Nancy Little 9450 Aspen Circle 944-2437 Linda Rudberg 10911 Jackson Drive 941-6977 PRECINCT 9B PAX CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH T2100 Pi oneeTTFair 941-3150 Rhoda Haas 9955 Pioneer Trail 944-2449 Carol Hegge ** 10015 Pioneer Trail 941-2707 Isabell Iverson 12135 Oxbow Drive 941-7465 Betty Schaitberger 12880 Pioneer Trail 941-1451 ALTERNATES • Laverne Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Leota Hales 7946 Island Road 934-1746 Mary Helfand 15476 Village Woods Drive 934-6704 Caroline Nelson 16300 Hilltop Road 937-8941 William Schwartz 15051 Scenic Heights Road 937-2289 ** Denotes head judge • ADOPTED BY the Eden Prairie City Council on this 7th day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John 0. Frane, City Clerk • • 1'q) Bentec Expansion CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 24-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 81-02, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That Ordinance No. 81-02 be amended by adding the following: "Section 2. That the plans dated June 15, 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 10, 1990, for the expansion of the existing Bentec Engineering Corp. development, shall apply. "Further, said land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement for the property, dated March 3, 1981, between the City of Eden Prairie and Bentec Engineering Corp. and that certain Supplement to Developer's Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and Bentec Engineering Corp. dated August 7, 1990." Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on July 10, 1990, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 'UBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of _ I'),; EXHIBIT A Legal Description Lots 11 and 12, Block 3, YORKSHIRE POINT, Hennepin County, Minnesota. rocl RAP CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ( Ordinance No. 81-02 AN OROINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENOING ORDINANCE NO. 135 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended as follows: The following described property, situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, Lots 1I and 12, Block 3, Yorkshire Point shall be and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Office District. Section 2. The above-described property shall be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of Eden Prairie relating to the Office District. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20 day of January, 1981, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City,on the 3rd day of March , 1981. 1•62.1.'74.1 1Jol ang HJ. P nzel, Mayor ATTEST) 1/. '� V Jon rape; City Clerk PU ISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 19B1. /100) Bentec Expansion SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of 1990, by BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WHEREAS, Developer and City made and entered into a Developer's Agreement, dated March 3, 1981, for office use of the Property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Developer's Agreement for the Property referred to therein with respect to Developer's amended request for a 1,250 sq. ft. building addition, site plan review and Zoning District Amendment within the Office District; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #24-90, amending the zoning of the Property within the Office District, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in the following respects: A. Paragraph 1. shall be amended to read as follows: "Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated June 15, 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 10, 1990, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. B. The following paragraphs 5. - 9. shall be added: "5. Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of, plans for demolition and/or removal of the existing septic system on the Property. Prior to demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee the restoration of the Property to grade. Developer agrees to complete such demolition and/or removal and restoration work prior to occupancy of the structural additions to the Property. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the demolition or removal is completed and after it !'o /(CI is verified by City that the septic system has been properly removed or demolished, and that the Property has been restored to grade. "6. Concurrent with grading on the Property, Developer agrees to connect the structure to public sanitary sewer located at the east Property boundary, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. "7. Developer and City acknowledge that the ten (10) proof of parking spaces proposed for the Property, depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, are designated for use by the office building and that said spaces are not required to be constructed at this time. However, said spaces may be required to be constructed in the future, if it is determined by City, in its sole discretion, that it is necessary. At such time as City, in its sole discretion, may determine that it is necessary for all, or a portion of, said ten (10) proof of parking spaces to be constructed in order to accommodate the office use, the following shall occur: A. City shall notify Developer in writing of the need to construct all, or a portion, of said ten (10) proof of parking spaces. B. Within six (6) months of receipt of written notice from City, Developer agrees to have completed construction of all, or a portion of, said ten (10) proof of parking spaces, as determined by City, in the located as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. "8. Developer agrees that, at such time as Developer wishes to install site lighting on the Property, such all site lighting shall be designed and constructed to provide down-cast lighting and shall with be designed with cut- of f luminars. "9. Developer agrees to file the final plat for the Property at Hennepin County prior to issuance of any occupancy permit by the City for the expanded portions of the structure as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto." 2. Developer agrees to all the terms and conditions and accepts the obligations of "Developer" under the Developer's Agreement, as amended and supplemented herein. • Bentec Expansion CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-196 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE #24-90 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance #24-90 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of August, 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance #24-90, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for '.nspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the .:ity Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance #24-90 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 7, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk I tk ( Bentec Expansion CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 24-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND • FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land within the Office District, located at 13050 Pioneer Trail, subject to the • terms and conditions of a developer's agreement and a supplement to such agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. • Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frans /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor • PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1990. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) t /10-C Bentec Expansion CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-197 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR BENTEC ENGINERRING CORP. EXPANSION WHEREAS, Bentec Engineering Corp. has pplied for site plan approval of an expansion of their existing use on 1.85 acres of land located at 13050 Pioneer Trail, the zoning for which has been amended within the Office District by Ordinance #24-90, adopted by the City Council on August 7, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, • WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 10, 1990 meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Bentec Engineering Corp. for construction of building additions to the existing office structure, subject to the terms ad conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement between Bentec Engineering Corp., a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie dated March 3, 1981, and that certain Supplement. to such Developer's Agreement between Bentec Engineering Corp., and the City of Eden Prairie, dated August 7, 1990. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 7, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk C MEMO i TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: David P. Lindahl, Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: July 24, 1990 SUBJECT: CDBG Subrecipient Agreement The Community Development Block Grant Program regulations require that the City of Eden Prairie and Hennepin County execute a Subrecipient Agreement which sets forth the specific implementation processes for activities to be undertaken with Year XVI CDBG funds. The following resolution authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement on behalf of the City. MEMO724.DPL:bs 70 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE EENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-188 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has executed a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County for the purpose of participating in the 1990 (Year XVI) Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is the recipient of an annual grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for purposes of the program and the City is a subrecipient of those funds; and WHEREAS, program regulations require that the City and County execute a Subrecipient Agreement which sets forth the specific implementation processses for activities to be undertaken with program funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement, County Contract Number A 05510, on behalf of the City. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 7th day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMO DATE: 8/2/90 TO: CARL JULLIE FROM: KEITH WALL SUBJECT: FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEM The Forfeiture Committee has authorized the use of forfeited funds to purchase a simulated firearms training system. We made a request for bids in accordance with City purchasing procedures and three companies responded. 1. ICAT Apogee system $40,410.00 2. F.A.T.S., P002 System $47,175.00 3. ROBBEC Inc. did not meet specs. This simulated firearms training system will greatly enhance our ability to train Officers in the use of deadly force. The computer operated system can be used indoors and will supplement our outdoor range training. As you are aware the availability of outdoor range time has diminished in the past few years. In an attempt to share resources with other Departments, the Richfield Police Department has agreed to share in the cost by reimbursing our forfeiture fund. Training Officers from both Departments have met and come to agreement on the use of the system. We would ask that the Council approve this purchase using money from drug forfeiture. l Resolution No. 90- — 0 cA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $2,715,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (EDEN INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP PROJECT-FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN) SERIES 1990 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie (the City), as follows: Section 1. Findings. It is hereby found and declared that; 1.1) On July 17, 1990, the City authorized the issuance of its Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Eden Investments Partnership Project-FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Series 1990 (the Bonds) in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed Two Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,700,000). 1.2) It is proposed that the City increase the authorized aggregate principal amount of the Bonds to Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($2,715,000), to provide additional monies for the reserve funds pledged as additional security for repayment of the Bonds. 1.3) It is further proposed that the Amendment to Declaration of Restrictive Covenants attached hereto (the Amendment) be executed by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Section 2. Authorization for Issuapce ,rlyi Sale of Bonds" and Execution of Documenta. 2.1) Authorization for Issuance and Sele of Bonds • For the purpose of financing a portion of the Cost of refunding the City's $2,750,000 Housing Development Revenue Note (Eden Investments Partnership Project ) Series 1984 and funding certain reserve funds as additional security for repayment Of the Bonds, there is hereby authorized the issuance of the Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollar ($2,715,000) aggregate principal amount City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Eden Investments Partnership Project-FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Series 1990. All references to the amount of Bonds authorized in the City's July 17, 1990, Resolution are hereby increased to Two Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($2,715,000) . 2.2) Approval of Amendment. The City hereby authorizes execution of the Amendment in substantially the form attached hereto, but with such variaLians, omissions, and insertions as 2. /f ;L) mey be approved by the officers executing the some, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by such execution. 2.3) Affirmation - In all other respects, the City affirms and ratifies its Resolution dated July 17, 1990, entitleds A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $2,715,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (EDEN INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP PROJECT - FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN) SERIES 1990 AND APPROVING THE FORM THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO. 2.4) $ffective Date of Resolution - This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. Adopted by the City Council on August 7, 1990. [SEAL] Mayor ATTESTS • City Clerk SROsIP4s 3. 7 6 ITEM III. I. - THIS ITEM WILL BE HANDED OUT AT THE COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY EVENING 1 IV! / Chi Chi's Expansion L, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 25-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 357, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That Ordinance No. 357 be amended by adding the following: "Section 2. That the plans dated July 6, 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 10, 1990, for the Chi Chi's parking lot expansion, shall apply." Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on July 10, 1990, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of /ft i EXHIBIT A Legal Description Lot 2, Block 1, ALPINE TWO, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1. I11^ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 357 AN ORDINANCE REIATING TO ZONING AND-AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 135. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivision 1. Appendix,.A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended • by adding to Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto andande apart hereof, which property shall be and hereby 'is'removed from Rural zone and shall be included hereafter in.the Regional Office Zone. Subdivision 2. Appendix A of Ordinance No. 135 is amended by adding to Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 as follows: See Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof, which property shall be and hereby is removed from Rural Zone and shall be - included hereafter in the C. Regional Service Zone. Section 2. The above described property shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Rezoning Agreement dated April 22 , 1977, entered into between The Preserve and the City of Eden Prairie, which agreement is hereby made a part hereof and shall further be subject to all of the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City relating to such C. Regional Service and Regional Office Zones. Section 3. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 141h day of December _, 1977 and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on Ili4 • the . Sth day of Kay ;4977. Wolf enzel, Mayor ATTEST a' hn D. e, City Clerk ,;, ' en Prairie ews vn the day of '- , 1977. • ublished in'the.:f.d 1( o`i\+ y M • • • • • • • • to _ r -2 • - CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-203 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE #25-90 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance #25-90 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of August, 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance #25-90, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, •or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance #25-90 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 7, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk i•. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 25-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District for land located north of Prairie Center Drive, west of Highway #169. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1990. t (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) ( -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members FROM: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager DATE: August 2, 1990 RE: Revision to Access Control on TH 169 Adjacent to the Century Bank The Century Bank Building is currently under construction at the intersection of Viking Drive and TH 169. The development plan for the Century Bank as approved by the Planning Commission and Council shows a right-in access from TH 169 along the northwest side of the site approximately 150 feet southwesterly of the intersection of Viking Drive and TH 169. In 1978, the City purchased right-of-way in this area for TH 169 improvements together with access control along the northwesterly line of Outlot F(the underlying property for Century Bank). Access control did not extend across an existing curb cut to the property on TH 169 just southeasterly of the current location for Viking Drive. MnDOT has issued a permit for the construction of the right-in from TH 169 for the Century Bank project. MnDOT has requested that the City of Eden Prairie vacate by deed the access control purchased in 1978 over the currently constructed right-in access to the Century Bank site. Century Bank has proposed to deed to the City of Eden Prairie access control over the existing driveway location that is adjacent to Viking Drive. This would revise the access control along TH 169 adjacent to the Century Bank site to conform to the current development plan for the property. Staff recommends approval of the attached quit claim deed releasing access control over the new driveway location. This deed will be exchanged for a deed granting access control over the old driveway location. ADG:ssa ' . linen me 1031 el-Mee clam Ot to Minnow e vie/inn.One.....eine Swot,ii+let le Coieeee .•Hein , 1 Cnienielken ei/eine... lleii oi evineeiRie • - .—...—....----`. • No delinquent tarter sod treoafer onterryl;CrtelMh.ehe of Roof Fatale Value r )filer) ( I not redone.) • Certifirate of Rent Estill.Value I-to ___.____,19.._._ •• ---------••——-- . County Auditor •STATE DEED TAX DUE DEREON: $ 1•r 5__ _ . Dat.._•••••3 une ,19 9° • rrearr..ed for reroofing eat") -------.------------ FOR VALUABLE CONSWERA,T1t)N,__C 4 7 y 9.! Etlen.I)r a.).r..e•••__ ••••__ ____ • ' _,•algritc.745‘1 c.o..). •.5,11.).crii_'Hider the lotto of Grruilor.horPhy conveys and quitclaims tollt,..U.IaLL4.71ni,_flu_ild_Istg_ . —11.41.-ed_-Edr...tradr-S17.1.p._ _ — ,Corinfee, a_, S.C..).A.)1.4,Fr__ undo!the Iowa of Flirt on so t.4 —.real MORetiY it County.Minnerota,rleacritnnt Jr follows) • THE RIGHT OF ACCESS, ESEI7R3 THE it IGHT 01 I lIGIIESS TO LOT I. FEM.St: 1, VIKING DRIVE WEST, ACCORDINf.; TO In RECORDED PLAT THERSOF, REMIT:FIN COUNTY, rlINNESOTA, FRO7I TRUNK 4 ItHWAY NO. 154, FHoM A Poltrr Cel TUE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF' SAID i.01 I DISTANT 20.40 FEET SOtiTitI4ESTI.i.RUI , FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNEP. OF SAID [MT 1, As rtEASDREO AEOIIC SAID NORTIIIIESTERLY 1.I51F, Tr) A roIliT ON SAID VOnTlIWESTF.F1,T LINE '. DISTANT 17 9.40 FEET SOUTIINESTEIZLY FROM SAID 110ST NCI)TREE1,7 C'ORNER, , , AS MEASURED ALONG SAID tiOATINESTER LI LIME. . , lore...pv.14 Awl..enneinile tie SON together with nit he reditarnentn end afTurtenaiirer),41notrintl lIewilD• S...12".X..2 F Eder. Prait le '.-----;.-----.----_—_.-.--. "E•''..'d!• 'orr 11-r, By_ __, __ __ ______________ 14,-, ...fa9or _ . ' BY ...._' _ ___.---_---_-------.. 11,7:iiii5'9i'r — STATE Or MINNESOTA U. COUNTY OF..,:-_ ______ Th.for.going use icknowl•dged bnloro me thh _____day of by. Cr LI Ky_a„.1.'ISsggsm___. .___..d c ar 1 the—I11.9YErE.. — ... — and C111_1141!?3,-'... — of. C y_of ED FUD r ?,a Cr . .. tedniolen I co_.2.7... t_i___••, :, under the Ito,of MI o on t a ._._____--,on b-eTtiriTo-Ft.)-11 ____,.... or a t HOtliNiele ITAHP OR SOIL tOR OTHER TITLE ER II Weil 1 • i In:NV,V,41,P47=4"./Sgig,:'"4llnS'S*t.0*0' 11 COOS kW: P1111, hillidi i•*MI te..; Far r 1).E.r)thti. .i elm INSIAVI IINT HA I[`TARTE O sv He•RIE AHD A0e0e3Hit I 1.)C5 V.I.Ind CTAyo ( Char(OS Runs 7".•Ion Itori oe, 'SI Maur, & Silveri .700 tinrwest ,'"..enter • 90 South Sevonel- c troo) Minnenpol la, PIN 55400. IMMO.II /7i9. \ .. . .. r7...Ar P.Z...Z. - ,. room Me fort 14-OW GI A$41 MED 1.1leesietio',Wenn ron•••••••Int rt...0,01 Co.rrorelna o!Psoowsr.e fo c rreresonn re I,rn......... No delinquent tie:stand transfer enterosi;Cortifi•ate of Real Fatale Value I I filed f )nor RI:sued Certificate of Red Ettate Value No..___ - . County Auditor STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON- $._}•6 5.._ rr paw,__June __......___.._.. .p., 9.0.. (reserved for wordier:data) FOR VALMAHLE CONSIDERATION, Cont,try_[Tank. Fill i 1,1191 Li05trt:1 Partnership .. ........__ _........_ ._._._ .), iirititt7d pat tivniriii under the taws Wf MinneaELta ,OrmitirThererry conveys end,juitelaims to Cs t v 0 E:ren oral 1.se. ... Grantee.a__Muss:et po I r•elf:sD.r_te.„3,ai.li unJer the Iowa of...___..tlt 1112Ac.1:.a.._._. .._ ,teal property in linrIn Elp I a_ _ Countr,kilns:unto deacribed as follow,: ALL RIGHT OF ACCESS, BEING THE R if:ii•t• or !EGRESS TO AND EGRESS FROM LOT 1, BLOCK 1, VIK LNG DRIVE WEST. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF', HEN:JUIN COUtiTY, MINN'eso.i..7., TO TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 169. NORTHEASTERLY OF A POINT ON THE NOFTri•VESTERLY I I OE OF SAID LOT 1, DISTANT 133.00 FEET SOUTHSIFSTrk I.e FROM THE NOS? NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1, AS MEASURED A:.,Oiril SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE. !!!!....POrte',ord.&tenoln.or Inbar%) together with all hereditament,and appurtenances belonging thereto. Century Rank Out ldinq Waited Partners:11i ' . s ii.:.:•:.:!•.,,,n,f!lb.i.• By .:Ft!..:.1.firc1 Ciyi I:.al :writs talent!, III . Ito enPr al Partner hi -?, -• Cl:' P -----.7iii----__.- • STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF_ii e 11,2,eieLa : .,XJ....... The foregoing was acknowledged before me this...St___ ,,_...day of - __ 1060 by k ira A,._c_silp_,___:Ao...2.r g4.4,.a.nr.....cst.._Aged S Bei or ri..Cist•,:.a A IvestMn t S. T nf the_.vanwcALL1241. •_:•if C.ortt;try Ejar);!. ifier.: ils1inj'''-Lori tea Par trser'Air:—.t: *Of .,I 1 11113:arpTaiiiiiicili------ . under the laws of Mina5t.V..6:)!----T.— .on behalf o ha ,,artnerch i p . MOIR VAL IITAMT no'RAI mac:rite mu Oh R A11141 - IR1- 1.111111alaIPM iANI00 AnkArt.4,1%11 1 • CI ty .:r Eden PLAirlf. 76 cg,) Es:•••••-zi:sve Dr sou 1 ) f.1310,111W1WerWABORAITiiiii iiVAMSAfrU Al),,OP$44. Eden Pris:sr, NH 5544 ( : Charles Bans 'lace & Strhon 2900 Norwcat Center i 90 South Seventh Strnet iHsnneopolis, HE 55402 If 7") • Egrillir i •• MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources i DATE: July 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Resolution 90-187/Snowdrifters Snowmobile Trail Each year the City of Eden Prairie has agreed to be the sponsoring governmental agency for the Eden Prairie Snowdrifters Snowmobile Club granting a trail through the City. In order to accept this responsibility, the City must forward a resolution confirming that support to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. It appears as though the snowmobile trail alignment for 1990-91 will be in a similar alignment as to what was approved last year. BL:mdd res187/10 • t (7''1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-187 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT-IN-AID SNOWMOBILE TRAILS WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has developed a plan for a wide variety of trail systems throughout the City, and WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Snowdrifters Snowmobile Club and the Southwest Snowmobile Trails Association have requested the City of Eden Prairie to sponsor grant-in-aid snowmobile trails through the Minnesota Trails Assistance Program, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to maintain a public snowmobile trail in the southeast area of the City,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the City of Eden Prairie will apply to the State of Minnesota for a grant-in-aids trail that will be maintained by both the Southwest Trails Association and the Eden Prairie Snowdrifters Snowmobile Club, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources and the City Manager are authorized to approve contractual agreements for these grants. ADOPTED, by the Eden Prairie City Council this day of 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL snowres/O 4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-199 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ST. ANDREW CHURCH PARKING LOT EXPANSION FOR ST. ANDREW CHURCH BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of St. Andrew Church for St. Andrew Church, dated August 3, 1990, consisting of 12.4 acres into 2 lots, one outlot, and road right-of-way for a parking lot expansion a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of August, 1990. L Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-198 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and, ex anWHERE P requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 3.5 acres at the northwest corner of Baker Road and St. Andrew Drive be amended from Rural to Public. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 7th day of August, 1990. r I { Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City Clerk RES198.BS UNAPPROVED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 9, 1990 B. ST. ANDREW'S PARKING LOT EXPANSION, by St. Andrew Church. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 3.5 acres, with a variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Site Plan Review on 3.5 acres, Preliminary Plat of 12.4 acres into 2 lots, one outlot and road right-of-way for construction of additional parking spaces. Location: Northwest corner of Baker Road and St. Andrew Drive. A public hearing. Pastor Rod Anderson, representing the proponent, stated that the church was experiencing congestion in the parking area. Anderson noted that the current parking lot did meet City Code requirements. Anderson explained that the congregation was also investigating relocation of the church and had looked at over 25 sites to date. The church was requesting permission to use the recently acquired property adjacent to the church for a temporary parking facility for 37 spaces. Sandstad asked Anderson if the church had acquired Outlot A. Anderson replied yes. Sandstad then asked for clarification on the reference to temporary use. Franzen replied that City Code required that a hard-surface be provided and a variance would be necessary to proceed with a gravel surface. Sandstad asked if the land use approval for parking would be permanent. Franzen replied yes. Bye asked what time frame the church was proposing. Anderson replied that the church would like to arrive at definite conclusions related to relocation in 1990, but would like the temporary parking to accommodate members now. Bauer asked Anderson to present the rationale for the change in the ? Comprehensive Guide Plan. Franzen replied that a notice for a hearing on the change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan had not been published and, therefore, this item would need to be continued. Bauer recommended that the proponent be prepared to address this issue at the July 23, 1990 meeting. Anderson stated that the church's compelling reason for the change would be to utilize the parking for a special rally scheduled for the 2nd Sunday in September. Bauer stated that the compelling reason for the request should result in the benefit to the entire community. Franzen reported that Staff was initially concerned how the parking lot would fit in with surrounding uses and recommended that a neighborhood meeting be held. Staff further requested that the plans be revised to provide adequate screening of the parking area. Anderson stated that the church had invited residents to a meeting to discuss the proposal; however, no one attended. The church had also extended an invitation for neighborhood residents to stop in at the church office if they had any questions. !(,' Bye asked if the overall long-term plan was to acquire additional adjacent land for further expansion. Anderson replied that the church wished to eliminate on-street parking and to accommodate members. Franzen noted that the approval at this time was for a parking lot use. Bye then asked if the use could be considered a temporary use exclusive for the church. Bob Smith, representing the proponent, presented plans for the parking lot area. He noted that the parking lot was 8 feet lower than the street and proposed a 4-foot high berm. Smith stated that pine trees would also be planted. Sandstad asked Smith if this plan had been revised in response to Staff's request for additional screening of the parking area. Smith replied yes; however, Staff had not seen the plans prior to this evening. Franzen replied that plant material alone would not screen the parking lot adequately and added that Staff would need time to review these plans further before a recommendation could be made. MOTIONS Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to continue the public hearing to the July 23, 1990, Planning Commission meeting pending revision by the proponent of the grading and screening plans in accordance with Attachment A of the July 6, 1990, Staff Report, and pending receipt from the proponent of substantiation of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for the Property. The proponent should be prepared to present compelling reasons for the request for the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. This item should be published for City Council review for the first meeting in August. Motion carried 4- 0-0. 1, !-i.V) ( (- STAFF REPORT 12: The Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THRU: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: July 20, 1990 • SUBJECT: St. Andrew Church Parking Lot Expansion LOCATION: Northwest corner of Baker Road and St. Andrew Drive APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: St. Andrew Church REOUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Church on 3.5 acres. 2. Zoning Distict Change from Rural to Public on 3.5 acres. , 3. Site Plan Review on 3.5 acres for Preliminary Plat of 12.4 acres into 2 lots, 1 outlot, and road right-of-way. BACKGROUND _, This is a continued item from • r — 0 the July 9, 1990 meeting. The :�;:���:;.`,_,- -_ .•-° Planning Commission directed •` the proponent to provide a R �,.rJ ' _' R1-13.5- ----- substantiation for the change - in the Comprehensive Guide Plan f from low density residential to w _ -`' church and to revise the site ' plan for screening of the ; �_ parking area from St. Andrew , � ` Drive, residential areas to the RM•2.5 , �. j R1-9:5 north, and Baker Road. r i uE:--.. • • COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE \ ' i The church has provided the 'RM 2.5411•Ipp.... _iff..... , attached narrative explaining ! reasons for the justification N C-Co RM-2.5 Cz\''''',..1:` C-CON • v., • RM-6.� 1 '7( / :1-2 1.2! -1-2' 1 -. AREA LOCATION MAP r A' F C Staff Report St. Andrew Church Parking Lot Expansion July 20, 1990 of the Guide Plan Change from low density residential to church, which is summarized as follows: 1. Minimal impact on the Guide Plan Balance - a displacement of four potential single family homes. 2. Most of the surrounding area is guided church and multiple family. The parking lot expansion will impact some adjacent homes, however, berming and plantings can mitigate the views. 3. Minimal impact on natural features. 4. No impact on City sewer and water. 5. Traffic impacts are minimal duringweekday y peak hours. Since the Comprehensive Guide Plan does not designate specific sites for churches, they are evaluated on the basis of need and impacts on the adjoining land uses. Screening of the parking area may be a mitigative measure which will allow the parking lot expansion to transition to the surrounding areas. SCREENING OF THE PARKING AREA A revised screening plan has been submitted which provides berming and plantings of shrubs and evergreens screen parking areas .from St. Andrew Drive, Baker Road, and surrounding residential land uses for both phase one and phase two. VARIANCES The church is requesting a variance from the City Code to permit a gravel surface parking lot. Although this is an action which is reviewed by the Board of Appeals, the Commission may wish to provide input. The Staff would suggest that a gravel surface be allowed to be used for no more than a 1 year time period or until July of 1991. Regraded portions of the landscaping area in phase one should be sodded and all plant materials installed including 33 inches of tree replacement. This should be done concurrent with phase one construction. !, 2 C Staff Report St. Andrew Church Parking Lot Expansion July 20, 1990 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS I. If the Planning Commission feels that the proponent has provided compelling reasons to justify the change in the Guide Plan from low density residential to church, then one option would be to recommend approval of the project based on plans dated July 17, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 20, 1990, and subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to final plat approval proponent shall: 1. Provide detailed storm water run-off, utilities, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall: 1. Stake the proposed construction limits with snow fencing around trees to be preserved and provide erosion control barriers. 2. Notify the City Watershed District a minimum of 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Receive Board of Appeals variance for use of a gravel surface on the parking lot. II. If the Planning Commission feels that the proponent has not provided compelling reasons to justify the change in the Guide Plan to church, then one option would be to recommend that the plans be denied. STAND2.MDF:bs T 3 COMPELLING REASONS FOR GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT ST.ANDREW LUTHERAN CHURCH There are compelling reasons why the Guide Plan should not have to be amended to accommodate the expansion of St. Andrew Lutheran Church but we are more than happy to comply with the City Planning Commission's request for compelling reasons why the Guide Plan should be changed. The following is a brief discussion of our rationale for the changes. 1. What impact does the Guide Plan change have on the Community? The subject property is technically guided for single-family development, a use that most recognize will not occur because of very difficult terrain and very high development costs. A literal interpretation would, however, suggest that three to four potential single-family homes would be lost as a result of St. Andrew's expansion. Since the City of Eden Prairie has approximately 8,000 single-family homes, the proposed change would have a miniscule impact on the City's land use balance. 2. What impact would the Guide Plan change have on the surrounding land uses? Surrounding land use includes single-family development to the north, multi-family development to the west, St. Andrew Lutheran Church to the southwest and vacant land to the east and southeast. Lands to the southeast and northeast of the subject- property are all zoned rural. There is a substantial separation between the subject property and the land southeasterly of the site across Mitchell Road which is guided for multi-family housing. In all probability, lands to the northeast will also be developed for multi-family purposes because of the high cost of site preparation and exposure to Mitchell Road. The area that would be potentially impacted by the proposed Guide Plan change would be that to the north of St. Andrew Drive in the vicinity of the intersection of Prairie View Drive. There are two houses that could potentially be impacted by the temporary parking lot improvement. These will require special attention. Berming and a landscaped buffer are proposed as mitigating measures to screen views from these homes to the parking lot which, itself, is proposed to be built approximately eight feet below the grade of St. Andrew Drive. {' Even more significant is the very limited use this parking lot will receive, serving as an overflow lot for St. Andrew during Sunday /730 J morning worship. It will replace on-street parking and will primarily be used on Sundays. Most other church activity can be accommodated in existing parking lots. With proper screening of the parking lot from the homes to the north there will be no negative environmental impacts attributable to the Guide Plan amendment. 3. What impact does the Guide Plan change have on the site? The Guide Plan change will permit the construction of a parking lot which requires considerable fill material to make this or any project feasible. The filling operation will destroy a considerable amount of on-site vegetation most of which is boxelder and elm. According to City Staff, only 33 caliper inches of replacement vegetation will be required for the initial project. It is also important to note that many of the elms are diseased. These have been ordered to be removed by the City. Any further development of the subject property will require additional filling and the loss of additional scrub vegetation. We propose that the required tree replacement be employed as a screen along the north property line to serve as a buffer for the residences across St. Andrew Drive. 4. What impact does the Guide Plan change have on water. sewer, storm water run-off and roads? Since the proposed parking lot improvement requires no public services, it will place no additional burden on the City's public utility systems. Storm water run-off can be handled very easily and responsibly by draining the parking lot to the east into the existing storm drainage system. Some energy' reduction attributable to steep grades will be required and is proposed as part of the storm sewer system. Assuming full occupancy of the parking lot on Sunday morning, a fairly infrequent occurrence, total Sunday morning trip generation will approximate 220 vehicle trips to/from the proposed Phase 1 temporary parking lot based on three worship services. This is traffic that will already be present at the church site no matter whether the parking lot is expanded or not. No traffic attributable to this project will be generated during peak weekday traffic periods. The proposed driveway is planned to intersect St. Andrew Drive at Prairie View Drive for the purpose of minimizing traffic conflicts and maximizing sight lines. City Staff agrees that adequate sight lines are reflected in the plan. There will be no effect on the level of service of any intersection attributable either to the Guide Plan change or the construction of the temporary parking lot during peak weekday traffic f, periods. Guide Plan Change Page 2 11,31 5. Is the request for Guide Plan change a better use of the land? It would be difficult to suggest that the proposed change in use is a better use of the land than the single-family development for which it is presently guided. However, single-family development on the subject property is probably not feasible given the tremendous costs associated with adapting the site for that use. Any homes constructed thereon would also have to back to Mitchell Road which suggests that homes of a lesser value than exist in the neighborhood would have to be built on the subject property. In all probability, and in accordance with discussions with City Staff, an appropriate alternate use for the property would be a medium- density residential development which could support more substantial grading costs. Multi-family development of a medium-density nature would also represent an excellent transitional use for the single-family residential development to the north of St. Andrew Drive. It is our opinion that the proposed parking lot and church use would qualify as an appropriate transitional use buffering single-family homes from Mitchell Road and the multi-family development proposed to the southeast. It will generate considerably less activity as a church parking lot than it will as a multi-family development and due to its below-grade design, will maintain views across the subject property that would otherwise be inhibited by any above-grade development. Furthermore, the proposed rezoning represents a' logical extention of the existing PUBLIC zoning and does not constitute a spot- zone situation that would be contrary to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. in summary, we very strongly believe that the Guide Plan change will have no impact on the community, no impact on surrounding land uses, minimum impact on site vegetation and only very limited traffic impacts that do not correlate with peak traffic periods. We believe the proposed parking use of the subject property is at least as good a transitional use as multi-family development which appears to be the logical alternative use for the property. We also believe that adequate screening of the parking lot to mitigate impacts on the residences to the north will he sufficient to maximize compatibility. Guide Plan Change ��1-, Page 3 C STAFF REPORT The Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THRU: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: July 6, 1990 SUBJECT: St. Andrew Church Parking Expansion LOCATION: Northwest corner of Baker Road and St. Andrew's Drive APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: St. Andrew's Church REOUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Church on 3.5 acres. 2. Zoning District Change from Rural to Public on 3.5 acres. 3. Site Plan Review on 3.5 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 12.4 acres to two lots, one outlot and road right-of-way. BACKGROUND This site is currently guided low density residential. The R ,5:- R1-13.5---- — Guide Plan depicts surrounding . ! land uses as low density r z residential to the north, ti 0R1r13.5 FtM-B.a medium density residential to - -- the east, church to the south, 1 and medium density residential p 1. 11 r 1 to the west. rRM\5 l. .� I f i ��Ri 9. t COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE •.� t• A Comprehensive Guide Plan PROPOSED SITE Change is requested from low '•RM-2.5 •_y density residential to church on 3.5 acres to provide c-Co RM-2.5 additional parking for the 9 t,- C-COIN r s , RM-6.5 - I' L 1 ( 12 -1-2' ,� , AREA LOCATION MAP ; • C ( church. It is the responsibility of the proponent to provide compelling reasons for the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Comprehensive Guide Plan does not designate specific sites for churches. Churches are evaluated on the basis of need and impacts on adjoining land uses. The area between St. Andrew Drive and Baker Road could be developed for low density residential, but would be difficult due to the steep slopes. Multiple family could be an alternate land use that could work on steep slopes. Expansion of the church in this area could be acceptable predicated upon a transition to the surrounding residential areas. Preservation of natural features and screening will be necessary to mitigate the impacts of a parking lot expansion in this area. SITE PLAN The church currently provides parking according to Code (One space per 3 seats) adjacent to the church on the south side of St. Andrew Drive. Due to increase in church attendance, there is a need to provide additional parking spaces. Adjacent streets are used when the parking lot is full. The site plan depicts a two phase parking lot expansion. Phase one would be for 37 cars, phase two would provide an additional 70 parking spaces. Parking meets City Code setbacks for phases one and two. The church is requesting a variance through the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to allow a gravel surface parking lot for up to two years. The City Code currently requires all parking lots to have a hard-surface, either concrete or bituminous. SCREENING OF PARKING The phase one parking lot will require minimal grading. The existing house at the top of the slope would be removed and a small area graded for a 37 car parking lot. Berming alone along St. Andrew Drive will not screen parking, and conifers and mass shrub plants are needed (See Attachment A) . Parking would be screened from existing single family homes to the north and Baker Road to the east by existing vegetation. When phase two is constructed, all of the existing natural vegetation along Baker Road would be removed. The grading plan as proposed will not screen the parking area. It is possible to create a berm at the top of the slope which would screen parking (See Attachment A). There are 33 inches of significant trees on site. This would be removed with phase one construction. Tree replacement would be 33 inches. 2 t ACCESS Sight vision distance required for driveway access to St. Andrew Drive is based on the 30 mph design speed for the road. The line of sight to the left (south) should be a minimum of 350 feet and to the right (north) a minimum distance of 250 feet. The driveway is proposed opposite Prairie View Drive for phase one. Sight vision distance meets acceptable standards at this location. Phase two will use this access plus a second access near Baker Road. This access aligns opposite a driveway into a parking lot south of St. Andrew Drive. VARIANCES The church is requesting a variance from the City Code to permit a gravel surfaced parking lot for up to two years. Although this is an action which is reviewed by the Board of Appeals, the Planning Commission may wish to provide input. The City has previously permitted the use of gravel on parking lots for churches without variances based on any or all of the following conditions: 1. The church has an approved site plan and the temporary parking was in an area for future expansion. 2. A gravel surface was allowed to be used during the construction process of a church expansion. 3. Grading work for the parking lot was completed too late in the year for a hard-surface. The gravel surface was allowed to be used until the following spring. 4. A temporary gravel surface was allowed for no greater than a six month period. STORM DRAINAGE Since the amount of storm water run-off is minimal, water will sheet drain overland into the wooded slope. When phase two is constructed, a storm sewer system with an outlet to Baker Road will be necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS I. If the Planning Commission feels the proponent has provided +. compelling reasons to justify the change in the Guide Plan from low density residential to church then one option would be to recommend approval of the project based on plans dated July 6, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report July 6, 1990 and subject to the following conditions: 3 C ( A. Prior to Council review, the proponent shall: • ( 1. Modify the grading plan to provide a berm, conifers, and mass plantings where shown on Attachment A. 2. Provide a tree replacement plan for 33 inches. B. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: 1. Provide detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. C. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall: 1. Stake the proposed construction limits with snow fencing around the trees to be preserved and provide erosion control barriers. 2. Notify the City and Watershed District a minimum of 48 hours in advance of grading. D. Receive Board of Appeals variance for use of a gravel surface on the parking lot. II. If the Planning Commission feels that the proponent has not provided compelling reasons to justify the change in the Guide Plan to church then one option would be to recommend that the plans be returned to the proponent for revisions which would mitigate the impacts of a parking lot on the surrounding uses. STANDREW.MDF ci 4 LW CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE NENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-200 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BORUCKI ADDITION FOR JIM BORUCKI BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Borucki Addition for Jim Borucki, dated August 3, 1990, consisting of .62 acres into 2 single family lots a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of August, 1990. • Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk { UNAPPROVED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 9, 1990 A. BORUCKI ADDITION, by Jim Borucki. Request for Preliminary Plat of 0.62 acres into 2 single family lots within the R1- 13.5 Zoning District. Location: 6517 Rowland Road. A public hearing. Frank Cardarelle, representing the proponent, presented the plans for a 2-lot plat. The existing garage would be removed and a new garage constructed. Cardarelle believed that an additional single-family home would buffer the Carmel project. Storm sewer and sanitary sewer would be connected. Turn- around driveways could be provided for each of the lots. Cardarelle believed that this proposal would be an improvement for the neighborhood. Re added that proponent understood that Rowland Road needed to be upgraded prior to any development. Franzen reported that the proposal met all R1-13.5 zoning requirements. Franzen noted that the main question was when the development should take place. The site distance needed to be corrected and Staff recommended that no Final Platting occur until the final alignment for Rowland Road had been determined and sanitary sewer connections had been made. Staff further recommended that the plans be revised to reflect turnaround driveways for both homes prior to City Council approval. Bauer believed that turnaround driveways were essential unless the road design changed drastically. Cardarelle stated that the proponent was comfortable with the recommendation for the turnaround driveways and that the Final Plat not be issued until the completion of the feasibility study. Bauer then asked if there would be any drainage problems created for the homes on the other side of Rowland Road. Fanzen replied that little grading would be required for the building pad. Bye asked for clarification on when actual construction could begin related to the Final Plat approval. Franzen replied that the proponent would have to wait for Final Plat approval before construction could begin. Bye then asked if the Feasibility Study showed that problems would arise from this proposal would there be time to make corrections prior to City Council review. Franzen indicated that the rise in the road to the north would be lowered to improve sight distance. The feasibility study would not be completed before Council review. Bauer asked if the new road alignment would take a large portion of the proposed property. Franzen replied that the plat provides additional R.O.W. for Rowland Road Upgrading. r�3� MOTION 1: Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 2: Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Jim Borucki for Preliminary Plat of 0.62 acre into two single family lots within the R1-13.5 Zoning District, based on plans dated June 29, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 6, 1990 with the addition of turnarounds as per plans presented to the Planning Commission on July 9, 1990. Motion carried 4-0-0. • t i!PO ( ( STAFF REPORT TO: The Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THRU: Chris Enger, Director of Planning • DATE: July 6, 1990 SUBJECT: Borucki Addition ,LOCATION: 6517 Rowland Road APPLICANT/ FEB OWNER: Jim Borucki REOUEST: Preliminary Plat of .62 acres into 2 lots BACKGROUND • The Comprehensive Guide Plan • - _ designates this site as low I . density residential for up to - 1 ' 2.5 units per acre. The site / f C-HWY; t� is currently zoned R1-13.5. C •; Surrounding properties are /I, R1tl c5 `• . zoned R1-13.5 to the north, I J �` 1. east, and south of the site , ' i, S': i with Bryant Lake Regional Park �, _ -. - -.,i•�•� t ;r� to the west of this site across )` `• Cru Rowland Road. • 11 This site is part of the 1984 j • 4Carmel Planned Unit DevelopmentI zoned R1-13.5 for 87 units on ` - 1 58 acres of land. ' Approximately 15 acres of land "` r �' -� I' was dedicated to the City. The PROPOSED SITE' • F11•4• 3•.5 net density based on \-a"6> 1,-; RM-65 approximately 43 acres is 2.0 - units per acre. \ r� In 1987, the northern portio •n l lit of the Carmel PUD was revised � ( . • and one additional lot was ,, ;++cc _.r added. fir' -'' \:� i 22. ;1, � . 11 .. ( AREA LOCATION MAP f IJ • PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of .62 acres into 2 lots. Both lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 Zoning District. There is an existing house on proposed Lot 2 and an existing garage on proposed Lot 1. The garage on proposed Lot 1 would be removed concurrent with construction of a new house. On Lot 1, there is enough room, within setback requirements of the R1-13.5 Zoning District and the sanitary sewer easement to construct a house (first floor 2,200 square feet) and a 2 car garage. Attachment A indicates the size of the lots adjoining the property. A case could be made that the subdivision of the Borucki parcel into lots of 13,500 square feet each may not be an appropriate transition to the adjoining lots which average 20,000 square feet in area. On the other hand, adding one more lot to the overall PUD does not appreciably change the density. The approved PUD density on the net acreage is 2.01. That density increased to 2.03 units per acre with the Carmel PUD revision in 1987. The additional lot created by the Borucki Addition would increase the overall net density of Carmel to 2.06 units per acre. ACCESS Access to the 2 single family lots will occur off Rowland Road. Staff has checked the sight vision distance for access to both parcels and have determined a sight vision problem to the north along Rowland Road. Sight vision distance requirements are based upon a 30 mph design speed which would require a minimum of 350 feet of vision to the north and 250 feet of distance to the south. Since traffic tends to exceed the 30 mph limit, the threshold for sight vision distance decreases dramatically. A feasibility study is currently underway for the upgrading of Rowland Road. This upgrading shall include extension of sanitary sewer, curb and gutter, and improvement of the sight vision distance throughout the length of the roadway. Timing of the improvements has not been established. Since the R1-13.5 Zoning District requires connection to City sewer and water, no final platting shall be approved until that time when sanitary sewer will be available to the property with the upgrading of Rowland Road. This would be similar to the requirement for the Farber Addition subdivision to the south of this project. Although the improvements to Rowland Road will provide for the appropriate amount of sight vision distance based on the speed of 2 t`, the roadway, there should be provisions for turnarounds on each of the proposed lots so that future home owners would not have to back into traffic on Rowland Road. UTILITIES Proposed Lot 2 is connected to City sewer from the Carmel subdivision. Water is provided by an existing water line in Rowland Road. City sewer terminates approximately 300 feet to the south of this site. GRADING Since the site is relatively level adjacent to Rowland Road, a minimum amount of grading will be necessary in order to accommodate the house as proposed. No significant trees will be lost due to construction. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS I. If the Planning Commission feels that the timing of this proposal is not premature due to the upgrading of Rowland Road, and the extension of sanitary sewer to the property, then Staff would recommend approval based on plans dated June 29, 1990 subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 6, 1990, and subject to the following conditions: A. Prior to City Council Review, proponent shall: 1. Modify the preliminary plat to include provisions for turnarounds on both lots. B. Prior to final plat approval the proponent shall: 1. Await the completion of the Rowland Road feasibility study and not proceed until such time as the letting of the improvements take place. 2. Submit detailed grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and the Watershed District. C. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: 1. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee II. If the Planning Commission feels that the timing of this proposal is premature due to the need for Rowland Road upgrading and the extension of sanitary sewer to the property, then Staff would recommend denial of the project without predjudice. 3 /(1!� g8"'61 e'zt'.#2' =-1 L yie 1 1 �j,o `� %,S'1,,°' �}7 —----- /sa� R• ssi �; o r t!!(': /115 p 1:e%!' / xjyp +':�' ,L';•.- '� L B<ss r 1 owe i i►`� s'irs' / /p4 %t• 1�iaare—7 1_�,e ? �`/Lilo,'�'J is^�' e i 1M 20 a .1� a./4.36' I le.B.a�3rs>1 �-�, � _ N ,,.r ;om q,.. IN • t O I v \I I4 •b� I:744,,..,, ,. 4.1e...7 'i' • H........., 9I o e 1 A 7J0'E ;� 4 Iwy 12 y{ (h 13 ��°� �s of f� rr�;•aa ''• ' o--.4 z r /moo ,,k ��,Ordji i.r'r�.w1 �,r 15 \I;% l6 ei/ v 4\-..... s e/^4 19 •al 1�� L 7x`pJ 1� �/v�� klj\ ,111a �1j•j, f r Nt S15 \\\ z 1 0��d,$7J l�B.r,17 ! / .rj,1., l/ 1/� er !i'11 • \\ o �� r �•io l I 17• 5 I ry •}••��_ / 1 I$ !.I k, ro; ,,,ico,�,// o°B1--'7 _ .•J l 1. h /),� 14 ' S aao''s''o'! / y?y/iV 1'Tl1 .5�i/ /� -�\� C`o,. h pll 1��J6 'A��. •,titi ! �--/ L Bpi, //\ 8 4/ /ba 0 a. iZ3 i. s/ °4A rosd �946y // 4�` //\s04i$ I� 6� O le rh ar,B' s ;q, ti. / 1.004 0 1b1 .5i, / rb Isaoo i—,, y� 4;--���*,�/16 .J � 4.7.r / .. '�'•y. 0 - - b 4 J ix ItG�L,.W/ 1/4y/ 1 0.4 )�- c<%a``4 .M 7n 4 �` h ra ��� 1// .i on s) • . i�e:t.:iv. 1•" 1?/C� k. • ct 25 e2 /l�r-E% tij///,\ s a>e'14a, R,G69 /lb�b..6 99;! I %Q k C .. ��< ,,"b;. / /: , L�,y,Ste.\ \i. \I IZ � CO'� ?5.,� .r.;-s.��,h 1Cv� r4//e.J.,s \*11\ 6 01 V, r. 4 43. �� / 19�•31 i1 .50// ''s" \ 1Z -, \la A I o ..4 iv J si , \ 4 m\ �i. Ito l4-' * F N.,,,, � ,o1cCp \W A '.-1 i o' \ \,, �� 1 0 N •b 1 1V \N • S7. 5 �i 04 . o "3% osf• `. SI h O N,.3).. ,10`.`....',47 s.43 el e R\ cents are shown thus ^! r0. >% •` I c R\2 "'iv' S.` In V c c \3�39 \ °'N.\ ��� .LCr 4..•1 "ITZ \y. M� `. j .�%ro 66 .. \ i oI �3k j \\ ss otherwise indicated, and adjoining lot lines, joining street lines. as shown on the plat. A-r-rAz:44rzKrr 1 ite CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE // HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • t, RESOLUTION NO. 90-201 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF R.G. READ OFFICE/WAREHOUSE FOR R.G. READ & COMPANY, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: • That the preliminary plat of R.G. Read Office/Warehouse, dated August 1, 1990, consisting of 5 acres into 2 lots for construction of a 43,944 square foot office/warehouse building a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • / u UNAPPROVED PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 9, 1990 E. R.G. READ OFFICE/WAREHOUSE, by R.G. Read & Company, Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review within the I-2 Zoning District on 3.79 acres, Preliminary Plat of 5.0 acres into 2 lots for construction of a 43,944 square foot office/warehouse building. Location: Edenvale Industrial Park. A public hearing. Wayne Jeskie, representing the proponent, stated that the same building plan was review last winter, but would now be constructed on twice the amount of land. Franzen reported that Staff recommended approval of the proposal based on the recommendations outlined in the Staff Report. MOTION 1: Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 2: Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of R. G. Read & Company, Inc., for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 Zoning District on 3.79 acres for construction of a 43,944 sq. ft. office/warehouse building, based on plans dated June 26, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 6, 1990. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 3: Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of R. G. Read & Company, Inc., for Site Plan Review within the I-2 Zoning District on 3.79 acres for construction of a 43,944 sq. ft. office/warehouse building, based on plans dated June 26, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 6, 1990. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 4: Bye moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of R. G. Read & Company, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 5.0 acres into two lots for construction of a 43,944 sq. ft. office/warehouse building, based on plans dated June 26, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 6, 1990. Motion carried 4-0-0. • ft/V. MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: August 3, 1990 SUBJECT: R.G. Read and Company, Inc. At the July 9, 1990 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission recommended to the City Council, approval of the R.G. Read building. Since that review, the proponent has found that some soil borings indicate unsuitable soils near the location of the proposed structure. To correct this situation, the proponent has shifted the structure approximately 40 feet to the north. This shift will not affect setback requirements or other aspects of the previous site plan, except for the loading facilities being closer to the north property line. The higher elevation along the north property line, should help in screening the loading facilities. The plans have been revised based on the recommendations of the July 6, 1990 Staff Report. In addition, the proponent requests City Council approval for early grading permit issuance. Recommendations Staff would recommend approval of the zoning district amendment and site plan review within the I-2 Zoning District on 3.79 acres, preliminary plat of 5 acres to 2 lots for construction of a 40,944 square foot office/warehouse building based on plans dated August 1, 1990, this memo, and the following: 1. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Provide detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans to the City Engineer and Watershed District for review. B. Coordinate the 60 inch storm sewer construction planning with the Engineering Department, including project design and profile drawings. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Notify the Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. ti B. Submit building materials samples for review. 3. The proponent acknowledges that when and if a future addition is proposed for this property as indicated on the site plan, a return to the Planning Commission and City Council will be required in accordance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance. RGREADMO.SAK:bs rr, ( ( ( STAFF REPORT ( S2: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Planner THRU: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: July 6, 1990 SUBJECT: R.G. Read and Company, Inc. LOCATION: East of Corporate Way and north of Martin Drive APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: R.G. Read and Company, Inc. REOUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review on 3.79 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 5 acres into 2 lots. i 1 BACKGROUND ,--5 --.\_ I, ,�1 :\ The Planning Commission may , j recall that an R.G. Read "`; \ 1' Rb proposal was reviewed back in F P S� i January of 1990. The request ,- M12., at that time was to develop a 4` �'� 1 1.82 acre site lying north of j,. I ;RM1 the Chicago Northwestern 1111 -- �''! Railroad spur track. The �,�"7.7�� A/� j' project received a 1st reading ;,..,:_.1- ` 44n by the City Council. The t+!a76-'s '' 1'6E14I 1? 1. i proponent has indicated the ,'or< f ?'�r I need for a larger site and is _ tS J now resubmitting for review . h4, \ F-e-- 1,,,, i plans for the building on a _ 3.79 acre parcel. In addition, /0 • 7 �.V the proponent will preliminary Qk4" ;!' —PROPOSED SITE i plat this property and the {l . ,.,D .,o:, 1' �. existing site to the north into , r 4. _2 1` (` (/' 2 lots. . -,:::.,?.....1. 1[ • 1 The Comprehensive Guide Plan I-GiEN I C depicts this and surrounding r properties for industrial land ,.....'_ use. The property is part of the Edenvale Industrial Park /-_- 2 I� AREA LOCATION MAP F/.1 / ( Planning Commission Staff Report R.G. Read and Company, Inc. July 6, 1990 Addition, zoned I-2 in 1969 per Ordinance #135. A drainage swale exists along the east property line, and an NSP easement runs along *he north property line. An abandoned Northwestern Railroad spur -ack dissects the property. SITE PLAN The site plan depicts the construction of a two story, 43,C,44 square foot office/ warehouse building with a Base Area Ratio of 16% and a Floor Area Ratio of 26%, meeting City Code. A future expansion area increases the B.A.R. to 25% and F.A.R. to 45%. All parking and structure setbacks meet City Code requirements. Parking, based on the building's proposed 50% office and 50% warehouse use requires 123 spaces. A total of 126 spaces have been provided, which includes 46 enclosed stalls. The loading area on the north side of the proposed structure will not be visible from the golf course or any residential properties, and will be screened from Corporate Way with the use of berming and plant material. PRELIMINARY PLAT This site is part of the Edenvale Industrial Park Addition plat and the Edenvale Industrial Park 5th Addition plat. The existing building to the north of this site is part of the property separated by an administrative subdivision. In order to clean up the lotting situation, a preliminary plat of 5 acres into 2 lots is proposed. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The north half of this property slopes at about a 10% grade in an easterly direction to the base of a drainage swale at the eastern property limits. The southern half of this property is currently being surcharged to compact the soil for development. Limited vegetation consists of scattered scrub and small cottonwoods. The proposed grading plan indicates the raising of the easterly portion of the property and filling of a large portion of the drainage swale. A 60 inch storm sewer pipe will take the place of the swale to maintain adequate drainage capacity. This will involve grading on the neighboring property to the east and will require permission from the property owners. A 7 foot retaining wall is proposed along the northern property line where the NSP tower is located. This retaining wall will require review and approval from the Building Department prior to construction. 2 j'rq C C Planning Commission Staff Report R.G. Read and Company, Inc. July 6, 1990 All storm water run-off will be collected by catch basin and routed to the proposed 60 inch storm sewer. Th_s site lies approximately 450 feet southwest of Purgatory Creek, therefore, is not within the Shoreland area. Based upon submitted information, the proposal does not lie within the 100 Year Flood Plain. UTILITIES City sewer and water service is available with connection to lines in Corporate Way. Disruption of a portion of Corporate Way will be necessary in order to connect to sanitary sewer service. (See Memorandum from City Engineer) ARCHITECTURE The 43,944 square foot two story building is proposed to be 42 feet in height. City Code allows up to 40 feet in the I-2 Zoning District. The architectural plans should be revised to comply with City Code. Construction materials consist of decorative or scored concrete block, or pre-cast tip-up panels, stucco, and glass. City Code requires that if scored concrete block is utilized, a minimum of 2 scores per block is necessary. The proponent has not decided which material will be used at this time. Site lighting will consist of downcast luminars within the parking area and wall pack units for the building. All proposed rooftop mechanical units will be screened with prefinished metal panels. LANDSCAPING Based on the building square footage, a total of 137 caliper inches of landscaping is required. The landscape plan meets the caliper inch requirement. All landscaping along the north property line is limited to understory material since the area is under an NSP powerline easement. Berming is provided along Corporate Way to screen the loading facilities and parking areas. Staff would recommend that the berming at the north corner of the building be raised at a maximum 3:1 slope to provide better screening of the loading facilities from Corporate Way. In addition, the evergreen 1 ( ( Planning Commission Staff Report R.G. Read and Company, Inc. July 6, 1990 trees proposed in this area should be clustered around the highest point of this berm to provide maximum screening. A mass of understory plant materials should also be provided along the northwest corner of the site to screen views to the loading area from Corporate Way (See Attached). A hedgerow of lilac plantings together with Marshall Ash trees are proposed on the south property line to screen the parking lot from views from the south. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the zoning district amendment and site plan review within the I-2 Zoning District on 3.79 acres, preliminary plat of 5 acres into two lots for construction of a 43,944 square foot office/warehouse building based on plans dated June 28, 1990, this Staff Report, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscaping/grading plan to maximize berming at the north corner of the building and to cluster the evergreens at the highest point of the berm to screen views to the loading facilities. In addition, provide mass understory planting at northwest corner of property to help screen views from Corporate Way. . B. Revise the architectural elevations to lower the penthouse height in order to meet the maximum 40 foot height requirement in the I-2 Zoning District. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Provide detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans to the City Engineer and Watershed District for review. B. Coordinate the 60 inch storm sewer construction planning with the Engineering Department, including project design and profile drawings. C. Submit detailed retaining wall design plans prepared by a registered engineer to the Building Department for approval. D. Receive permission from the property owners to the east for off-site grading. 1 1 !7S0 i 1 Planning Commission Staff Report R.G. Read and Company, Inc. July 6, 1990 3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Notify the Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Submit building material samples for review. 4. The proponent acknowledges that when and if a future addition is proposed for this property as indicated on this site plan, a return to the Planning Commission and City Council will be required in accordance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance. RGREAD.SAK:bs 5 iJ I / t - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl J.Jullie, City Manager FROM: Man D. Gray, P.E., City Engineer,--- DATE: j'� February 1, 1990 RE: r R.G. Read 3 Company, inc. Office/Warehouse Project on Corporate Way The construction of the proposed office/warehouse building on the southerly parcel of Lot 6, Edenvale Industrial Park will require modifications to existing City utility systems. Those modifications include the following: 1. In order to provide a water service for the proposed building it will be,, necessary to wet-tap the watermain which is in the boulevard area of Corporate Way adjacent to Lot 6. 2. In order to provide a sanitary sewer service for the proposed building it will be necessary to extend a service from the existing sanitary sewer in Corporate Way. No sewer service was provided for this parcel with the original construction of the sanitary sewer. The sewer is in the center of Corporate Way and is approximately 20 feet in depth. Construction of a sewer service at this depth requires the removal• of a segment of concrete curb and gutter and a large segment of the bituminous surface on Corporate Way. Since Corporate Way is a dead end, street provisions will need to be made to maintain traffic around the excavation for the sewer service. 3. The developer proposes to extend an existing storm sewer along the rear line of Lot 6 in order to accommodate the proposed grading of the site. fif In consideration of the significant utility modifications and additions required for this project, we would recommend that issuance of a building permit be contingent upon the submittal and approval of detailed plans and specifications for the utility work and bonding for the utility construction j in accordance with City Code. ADG:ssa Dsk#I5.RG-READ 750k MEMO • . . . . . . . , . __.: ,....,,, .. - -.....,„.y../..-71-• c ,NtNN . .' e • \ „ . eW 4 li FION.,,i. 1 ( •N v ,, 1 ,! . N , - '• kr' • r. 'f'' 'It p ', • -. 41.10 - .. ; N l \-- / . N ••• 447.----...--4-.. .'..7A.• -, ,,, P - at 41416P'-,, %' . '`N• . :k: ,. - . .....:: -..-.;..: .. ./. -4 4, -o N 7Pt.—.::-it - '6'li'.": •.,, - - 4 0 • ‘ '4, l7 .1.3:',-,. -7) :'''....--' • - ,. , _.: ' - t - \ ":::-% ' - •, . . 4, - g..,, 7 ,, 11, • " ‘.:-,-2.',,. ..' . .. - •..'4. - --- •-1i- ... '".,.''; . ... : -I.,. - . . :;1:4:.:,;_._'. - . -,.• -- -, ....-- • ' %.4.•t'i•.", .- . . ,.„-z.:.N . ...... ,• ,,,,,,..:...„*.s.::: 1..,..-. ..:- x-. .. _. . . 41,, • - - % - •- - c- - -- ;irk-. -,,...: -.• 06,,,,, : ,•,,,-. ,• ...., / . ---- ' .. ftili"*%%.11, ..- • , ' iv • --/ __ - ..:-..141 Ni... „ . - it 41\ -- ,,E• .,„ _ — . , t‘Atlikiv,411 . • I . ._ ! : . -,--- - wit . • -.:k u‘ i 1 . - -/ abb--41110,44.1 .• .!iiil ‘ , . ' c co . , / A 6.1111i'31AW 711, A /: . !A N.4*‘ / •. - ..---- '4. -•-• .41',Ift l'i Ir . - • - • ..._aiiiiir... . ' i ,,+ • . qiit / Adik\l" ' 46' 'Nor 4111Nratillir iar,....... lior . 1 Illt°, 1 4 b : /r1 sk z \k$.IC 0 • 14 -C, 3 .•• 1 -4 1 '11 ' •t °, ill 0' • 4 42 i 24 1 0 l• ,! ..A.. o I . 1 : 0 •. •i r En '1' ' . it•.11 5. 0 1C:•VI"----- ,16 e f 1753 ' ' 43)- -. • :I I.ATA41-itIENT .. AUGUST 7.1990 61279 PERFORMANCE COMPUTER FORMS COPY PAPER-CITY HALL 565.71 61280 BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM/FEES PAID 96.00 61281 BOB GASCH -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES 75.00 i" HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION .s1282 BRADLEY HINSETH -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE OONCERT SERIES 200.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61283 J L SHIELY COMPANY GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE 430.75 61284 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE JUNE '90 FUEL TAX 287.80 81285 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS 2081.10 81286 AT&T SERVICE 408.38 81287 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 129.55 81288 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 55.25 61289 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 4006.18 81290 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE 62331.73 81291 11 S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 50.00 61292 11 S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 8265.05 81.293 EAGLE WINE CO WINE • 698.71 61294 GRTGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 9.5373.37 81295 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR 29228.04 81296 PAUSTIS A. SONS CO WINE I.79.50 81297 El) PHILLIPS & SONS (11 LIQUOR 11102.79 81298 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 3073.00 81299 QUALITY WINE CO WINE 12497.57 81300 RANDY ALLAR REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 27.00 81301 KATHY BUCHHOLZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 81302 BARBARA CADOGAN -REFUND-CANOE LESSONS/SAILING LESSONS/ 24.00 -BRAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 61303 MARY roll CARNRY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS/TENNIS LESSONS 34.00 1304 ALICE CHANG REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 15.00 81305 THANE CHAPA REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 61308 PAM COFFMAN RRFIIND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 61307 AMANDA CONNOLLY -REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLI DE-SPECIAL 9.00 TRIPS & EVENTS 81308 GRETCHEN DORR REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 38.00 81309 ROSIE DUROSE REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 19.00 81:310 ANNA FITZSIMMONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 81311 JAMEY GOODALL REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY 27.00 61312 SHELLEY GOODALL REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 19.00 61313 CATHERINE GREEN REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 22.00 81314 JACOB HERRINK -REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS/PRESCHOOL 25.77 PLAYGROUND 61315 SHARI HENRY REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 22.00 61316 LINDA HOFFER REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 10.17 61317 CAROT, HOSEK REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 15.00 61318 .TOAN KANE REFUND-SKATING LESSONS/SWIMMING LESSONS 48.00 81319 JAYNE KELLY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 3R.00 61320 BRENDA KOPP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS R.00 61321 DEBORAH LESSONS REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS 15.00 61322 DON LARSON REFUND-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM 87.00 '. 81323 CYNTHIA LEWIS REFUND-WOMEN'S WEIGHT TRAINING 24.00 81324 DEBRA LIEPKE -REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE-SPECIAL 9.00 f TRIPS & EVENTS 61325 CAROLYN MAIDEN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 :1328 PAT MIDTHON -REFUND-HEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE-SPECIAL 9.00 TRIPS & EVENTS 16176749 /GSA 61327 PAT MINTON REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK BUILDING RENTAL 65.OQ 61328 PAT MOREEN -REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE-SPECIAL 6.00 TRIPS & EVENTS 61329 BRUCE OLSON REFUND-DIVING LESSONS 32.00 ir61330 KATHY PAGE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 1331 MARY JANE PETERSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 36.00 A1332 CAROLYN SCHOLZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 61.333 REV STMMS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 53.00 61334 CHAD THEIMER -REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE-SPECIAL 16.00 TRIPS & EVENTS/CANOE LESSONS 61335 IRIS TUNGSETH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 61336 DRRWOOD TWTGG REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00 61337 RRTH WAITERS -REFUND-BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDR-SPECIAL 9.00 TRIPS & RVRNTS 61338 LINDA WANKS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 34.00 61339 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 29.62 61340 RAPTOR CRNTER ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 14.00 61341 STATE TREASURER LICENSE-SEWER DEPT 15.00 61342 BRETT LOBBEN -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES 300.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61343 THE FIRST JOH PHILIP SOUSA -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES 350.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61344 KIDSONG AND COMPANY INC -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES 225.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61345 BRUCE BETTENDORF SOFTBALL& VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 366.00 61346 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION MANUALS-ENGINEERING DEFT 70.00 61347 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLLS 6/30/90 & 7/13/90 14003.39 61348 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 186.00 61349 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLLS 6/30/90 & 7/13/90 68729.68 61350 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 7/13/90 11528.51 11351 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 194.76 .1352 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST PAYROLL 7/13/90 2014.04 61353 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 7/13/90 32.00 61354 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG AUGUST '90 UNION DUES 1033.00 61355 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 7/13/90 25.00 61358 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 6/29/90 & 7/13/90 1060.00 61357 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA AUGUST '90 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 162.00 61358 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLLS 6/30/90 & 7/13/90 35943.47 61359 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 7/13/90 209.50 61360 MN DEPT OF P/S MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 73.50 61361 VALLEYFAIR SPECIAL TRIP/FEES PAID 907.20 61362 THE WAVE POOL SPECIAL TRIP/FEES PAID 92.00 61363 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-CITY HALL 45.80 61364 DR CLYDE HERTZMAN LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 1215.00 61365 BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT/PLANNING 614.53 -DEFT/SEWER DEPT/WATER DEPT/FIRE DEPT/ PARK & RECREATION DEPT 61366 BECKER & ASSOCIATES INC -ACRYLIC SHEET/PAPER LINE KIT/BASE COAT 323.33 PAPER-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER 61367 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE JULY LIFE INSURANCE 2420.17 61368 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY JULY LIFE INSURANCE 2724.40 61369 DANA GIBBS PACKET DELIVERIES 124.00 61370 JANICE BARTA REFUND-SPECIAL TRIP 15.00 61371 LINDA HAMMANG REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 33.00 14339890 /8S't AUGUST 7.1990 61372 GEORGE KELZER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 38.00 61373 JANICE MOONEY REFUND-SPORTS CAMP 45.00 61374 AMY NELSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 1.9.00 :375 KATHY PAGE REFUND-BASEBALL LEAGUE 13.00 81376 KATHY SANDBERG REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 5.00 61377 LISA WAGNER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00 61378 MICHAEL YLINEN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 61379 TWINS GAME SPECIAL TRIP/FEES PD 186.00 61380 METROPOLITAN SPORTS SPECIAL TRIP/FEES PD 44.00 61381 MINNESOTA TWINS OUTING-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 16.00 81382 EAGLE WINE 00 WINE 391.16 61383 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 2955.27 61384 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR 6135.65 61385 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY WINE 14.25 81386 ED PHILLIPS & SONS 00 WINE 3805.16 61387 PRIOR WINE 00 WINE 603.30 61388 QUALITY WINE CO LIQUOR 2806.93 61389 KANDIYOHI COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 35.00 61390 THE NOVEMBER GROUP SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 3680.00 R1391 AT&T SERVICE 97.47 81392 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE 93.67 R1393 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 205.57 ' R1394 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 457.59 81395 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 21738.32 R1396 JASON-NORTHCO PROP LP$*1 AUGUST '90 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 6983.38 81397 HOLIDAY INN-WILLMAR CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 163.35 '`. 61398 MINNESOTA CLE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 330.00 61399 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 560.10 11400 MACACADEMY SCHOOL-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 498.00 k 1401 JACKIE BRONSTIEN REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK BUILDING RENTAL 50.00 R1402 EMOGENE GIDEON REFUND-MPLS PARKWAY TOUR-SENIOR PROGRAMS 4.00 R1403 MARSHA HENDERSON REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 27.00 R1404 CATRINA JOHNSON REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY CLASS 30.00 81405 LYNNE MERRICK REFUND-GOLF CLINIC 22.50 61406 MR MOO-GEE MUI: REFUND-BEER LICENSE FEE 50.00 61407 DIANNE SANDVICK REFUND-GOLF CLINIC 22.50 61408 CYNTHIA SCHERER -REFUND-PAPER FUN ARTS-SUMMER LEISURE 14.00 PROGRAM R1409 ZACHARY SHIMOTA REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 19.00 R1410 JANE TEMPLIN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 61411 TERRI WALKER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 R1412 MINNESOTA COMMERCE DEPT NOTARY COMMISSION FEE-POLICE DEPT 10.00 R1413 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-HIGHWAY 5 TO 00UNTY ROAD 4 121203.84 :': R1414 ROSS SUTTER -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES 400.( c. 0 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61415 JEFF VEELINE -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES 600.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61416 STATE OF MINNESOTA STATE °ODE BOOKS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEFT 380.60 61417 CHANHASSEN BOWL OUTING-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 28.00 61418 DOMINO'S PIZZA OUTING-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 28.00 :`. 61419 SWINGS MINI-GOLF OUTING-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 42.00 61420 VALLEYFAIR NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM/FEES PAID 223.30 61421 BIRTCHER WELSH AUGUST '90 RENT-CITY HALL 21730.85 '1422 SCOTT REIN SOFTBALL & VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1013.00 .. •,1423 OMISH COUNTRY TOURS ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 533.40 19841814 AUGUST 7.1990 61424 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER -TRENCHER & TRAILER RENTAL-PARK MAINT/ 183.38 61425 AAA STTRIPING SERVICE CO TELECORDER RENTAL-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL ,{ 142E LIAA ARNE STREET STRIPING-SIGNS DEPT 3092.90 s1426 LIS CARNICAL PRODUCTS INC REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 50.00 61428 ACRO HIMCATA LUBRICANTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55.80 -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/SEWER DEFT/ 804.92 WATER DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER/POLICE DEPT 61429 ACTION THREADED PRODUCTS INC NUTS & BOLTS-WATER DEFT 24.18 61429 AITIINNTL INC -JULY '90 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEFT/FIRE 510.00 -DEFT/BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEFT/COMMUNITY CENTER 61431 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO -CAMCORDER RENTAL/VIDEO CASSETTES-POLICE 398.25 DEPT 61432 AMERICAN RED CROSS -FIRST AID TRAINING & EQUIPMENT RENTAL- 1122.65 -VIDEOS/TEXTBOOKS/MASKS/VALVES-AFTERNOON -PLAYGROUND/ROUND LAKE BEACH/RILEY LAKE 614:33 AMEX TIRE INC HIACH/POOL LESSONS 61434 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC SIGNS-STREET DEFT//PAARRKKNMMAAINTENANCE 206.5040 61435 DON ANDERSON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 106.00 61436 ANDON INC -HELIUM TANK & VALVE RENTAL-JULY 4TH 197.20 197.20 CELEBRATION 61437 ANDROC PRODUCTS INC TREE & WEED KILLING CHEMICALS-PARK MAINT 61438 TODD ANGUS MILEAGE/EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 138.96 61439 AQUA ENGINEERING INC SPRINKLER HEADS-FACILITIES DEPT 13 .9E 61440 ARMOR SECURITY INC -LOCK REPAIR/KEYS-WATER DEFT/PROGRAM 39.80 93,80 SUPERVISOR 61441 ARTISANS INC -T-SHIRTS-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/TEEN WORK 2202.07 PROGRAM .442 ASPEN RESEARCH CORPORATION SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 61443 B & S TOOLS -JAM RAM/HOSE & COUPLERS/PORTABLE POWER 17680.98 995.85 -RAM& HOSE/SOCKET SETS/RAIL/STRIPPERS/ -WRENCH STET-SRWRR DEFT/WATER DEPT/ 61444 BAr,HMAN'S EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -EXPENSES-CITY HALL/HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 69_80 61445 BACON'S ELECTRIC CO COMMISSION -REPLACE WELL FIXTURE LENS/LAMPS-WATER 555.23 6144E BATTERY & TIRB WAREHOUSE INC DEPT -BATTERIES/WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID- 722.98 61447 BEI,JING TWO CHINESB RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -AS 61448 BELL ATLANTIC TRICON LEASING CORP -AUGUST '90 COPIER LEASE P 73.19 PAYMENT-POLICE 61449 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY DEPT 358,Bs SERVICE 61450 BEST BUY CO VIDEO TAPES-FIRE DEFT 26.50 61451 BRUCE BETTENDORF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 165.00 61452 BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS SERVICE-ANIMAL CONTROL 573.50 61453 .TAMES R BITTERSOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 61.50 61454 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE 137.39 UONCESSION/COMMUNITY CENTER CONCESSION 1437.39 61455 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 61456 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON -JUNE '90 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE-ANIMAL 3876.44 (X)N9ROL 548.00 61457 JEFF BLUHM REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT ( 458 LOIS BOETTCHER -MINUTES-PARK RECREATION& NATURAL 64.50 -RESOURCES COMMISSION/HISTORICAL & '� 3756772 i I nUC CULTURAL COMMISSION 61459 TOBY BOYUM HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 232.00 ,J'146O J E BRAAS CO -GEARS/SEALS/BEARINGS FOR PRIMARY BASIN 1909.58 RAKE ARM GEAR BOXES-WATER DEPT 'n1461 LEE M BRANDT -SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID/ENTERTAINMENT 389.96 & COSTUME SUPPLIES-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 61462 ED BRION SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 46.50 R1463 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC CORD ASSEMBLY-FACILITIES DEFT 25.58 61464 BROADWAY PARTY RENTAL -STAGE TOP & CANOPY RENTALS-JULY 4TH 995.50 CELEBRATION 61465 VOID OUT CHECK 0-00 61466 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-PARK MAINTENANCE 2523.28 61467 BROADWAY SIGNS AND SPECIALTIES -TROPHIES/PLAQUES-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION/ 238.57 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 61468 BROWN'S ICE CREAM CO EXPENSES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 453.26 61469 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE MANUAL-SEWER DEPT 65.46 61470 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION COMPUTER MAINTENANCE-POLICE DEPT 600.00 61471 C & N W TRANSP CO STORM SEWER RENTAL-DRAINAGE CONTROL 360.00 61472 C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC CLADS/CHEMICAL STORAGE LOCKER-WATER DEFT 441.03 61473 CARBURETION & TURBO SYSTEMS INC -ZAMBONI CARBURETOR REPAIR-ICE ARENA- 122.43 COMMUNITY CENTER 61474 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO INC COOLER CONTROL REPAIR-LIQUOR STORE 232.30 61475 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT GASKET/STARTER & CORE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 301.29 61476 CENTRAIRE INC COOLING OPERATION REPAIR-POLICE BUILDING 148.38 61477 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEFT 330.05 61478 JAMES G CLARK JULY '90 EXPENSES-POLICE DEFT 200.00 61479 CLUTS O'BRIEN SMOTHER ARCHITECTS -SERVICE-FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR RELOCATION 3500.00 OF CITY HALL 9.480 CMI REFRIGERATION -ICE COMPRESSOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 125.14 CONCESSIONS 61481 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 9244.04 61482 COMMUNICATIONS WORLD -FINAL PAYMENT FOR PHONE SYSTEM/SERVICE- 6080.20 POLICE DEFT 6148:3 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC RADIO REPAIR-POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 640.60 61484 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC JULY '90 SERVICE-INSURANCE CONSULTANT 560.00 61465 CORPORATE VIDEO VIDEO PRODUCTION-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 498.00 61486 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC -DRILL BITS/SCREWS/CONNECTIONS-EQUIPMENT 193.24 MAINTENANCE 61487 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 8410.60 61488 WILLIAM DAGGETT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 110.00 61489 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES/VACUUM CLEANER-$195.00- 1029.12 WATER DEFT 61490 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL INC -RE-ROOFING & SHEET METAL FOR SENIOR 27320.00 CENTER-FACILITIES DEPT 61491 DAN & DAN'S MINUTEMAN PRESS -LETTERHEAD-POLICE DEPT/PRINTING FLYERS- 2148.60 -ROUND LAKE MARINA/JULY 4TH CELEBRATION/ RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 61492 CRAIG W DAWSON MILEAGE/EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEFT 30.50 61493 DAY-TIMERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING 19.73 '. 61494 MITCHELL DEAN MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE 11.25 61495 DECORATIVE DESIGNS JULY '90 SERVICE-CITY HALL 49.50 61496 DELEGARD TOOL CO -DISC PADS/GLAZE/PAD ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT 77.03 MAINTENANCE 61497 DEM CON LANDFILL INC -JUNE '90 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-SEWER 72.00 DEPT/STREET DEPT 6973272 , it U 61498 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC POWER WINDOW REPAIR/RADIO-EQUIPMENT MAINT 209.75 61499 DAN DESAULNIERS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 279.00 A 61500 DIESEL SERVICE CO INJECTOR PUMP REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT 276.05 9 61501 EUGENE DIETZ JULY '90 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 200.00 . 61502 DONS SOD SERVICE SOD-PARK MAINTENANCE 6670.00 i( 1503 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU -EXPENSES-HUMAN SERVICES DEFT/PARK MAINT/ 176.65 -SENIOR CENTER/OUTDOOR CENTER/ORGANIZED ti ATHLETICS/NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM `+ 81504 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 259.86 61505 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 27.05 61.506 PAULA DUNNUM AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 100.00 '9 61507 DYNA SYSTEMS SCRRWS-WATER DEFT 32.28 61506 R M PRODUCTS INC WRLD& REPAIR TRUCK PARTS-SEWER DEFT 35.00 61509 R P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT 281.19 1 61510 R-Z GO TEXTRON GOLF CAR RENTALS-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 100.00 61511 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY JUNE '90 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 627.62 61512 IICOIAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISION PEST CONTROL-FACILITIES DEPT 174.25 61513 EDEN INCENTIVES & PROMOTIONS -PROMOTION PENCILS FOR GROUP TOURS-FIRE 147.31 DEPT 61514 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY CLUB -REIMBURSEMENT FOR TICKETS GIVEN BY CITY 88.50 .'. OF EDEN PRAIRIE-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 81515 CITY OF EDINA JUNE '90 WATER TESTS-WATER DEFT 220.00 61516 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COIMIISSION 250.00 61517 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS -ADJUSTABLE RINGS-SEWER DEPT/DRAINAGE 147.25 CONTROL 61518 ELSMORE AQUATIC UNIFORMS-ROUND LAKE BEACH/RILEY LAKE BEACH 292.24 61519 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC -GLOVES/JACKETS/OVERALLS/PANTS/APRON COATS/ 447.81 -SPRAY PAINT/CHEMICALS-SEWER DEPT/WATER DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE/COMMUNITY CENTER 61520 RICHARD EMAHISER HOCKEY SCHOOL DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 1188.75 '11521 EMI LIGHTING-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 84.00 e, 1522 EMPRO CORPORATION TRIGGERS-FACILITIES DEFT 56.20 61523 WILLIAM ENDERSEN SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 960.00 61524 CHRIS ENGER JULY '90 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 200.00 61525 ERCOA INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS-PARK MAINTENANCE 8.15 j+ 61526 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC STOOLS-SEWER DEFT 190.00 61527 BETH FANNING POSTAGE-SPRING BROCHURE-COMMUNITY CENTER 5.00 61528 FAIRCHIELD MARKETING ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 350.00 81529 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHEMICALS-WATER DEFT 4810.50 61530 FIRE COMMAND SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEFT 19.00 61531 FIRST TECH COMPUTER COMPUTER SOFTWARE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 259.00 61532 THE FITNESS STORE TENSION BELTS-FITNESS CENTER-COMMUNITY CER 8.00 61533 FLAGHOUSE INC -PLASTIC HOOPS/STARTER PISTOLS/AMMUNITION/ 347.00 -STOP WATCHES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/POWER -MEGAPHONES-RILEY LAKE BEACH/ROUND LAKE BEACH 61534 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY REGULATOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 26.97 61535 MILT FLOYD SQUARE DANCING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 109.50 61536 FOCUS ONE HOUR PHOTO PRINTS/FILM-SAFETY DEPT 6.58 61537 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 3372.02 61538 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS INC PAINT-WATER DEPT/SEWER DEFT 118.82 61539 G & K SERVICES -COVERALLS/MOP HEADS-WATER DEFT/TOWELS- 567.50 PARK MAINTENANCE/LIQUOR STORE 61540 G T LAWN SERVICE -JUNE & JULY '90 MOWING SERVICE-PLEASANT 500.00 HILLS CEMETERY 2422880 /85UC� , 61541 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC LIABILITY INSURANCE 288.14 61542 LISA GANNON GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 270.00 61543 GETTING TO KNOW YOU ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 145.20 61544 .JAMIESON GIEFER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 101.00 R1545 JOSEPH GLEASON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 341.00 !; 1546 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER CUPS-FITNESS CENTER-COMMUNITY CENTER 72.58 01547 W W GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC -IMPELLARS/SCREWS/GASKETS/RINGSBEARINGS 2274.21 -PARTS FOR REPAIR OF SLUDGE RETURN PUMP & SUMP PUMPS-WATER DETP 61548 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SERVICE 125.00 61549 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 24.00 61550 W W GRAINGER INC SHELF UNIT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 62.37 61551 GRANT MERRITT & ASSOCIATES LTD -JUNE '90 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 24116.68 LANDFILL 61552 BRADLEY GRAY HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 106.00 61553 GREATER LOS ANGELES CHAPTER VIDEO CASSETTES-SEWER DEPT/WATER DEPT 398.50 61554 GROUP WEB INC -PRINTING-SUMMER BROCHURE-RECREATION 5983.04 ADMINISTRATION 61555 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC -FIXTURE COVER/LAMPS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/ 28.14 PARK MAINTENANCE 61556 H & H INDUSTRIES INC LIGHT BULBS-LIQUOR STORE 125.46 61557 HACH CO LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 287.13 61558 HARMON GLASS BACKSLIDER WINDOW-FORESTRY DEPT 99.00 61559 JIM HATCH SALES CO SHOVELS-PARK MAINTENANCE 69.00 61560 HAZARD CONTROL INC BOOTS/RAIN SUITS/GLOVES-SAFETY DEPT 148.12 61561 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 45.00 61562 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 958.00 61563 HENN CTY DEPT OF PROPERTY TAX POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATIONS 16.72 61564 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER MAY '90 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 2940.75 61565 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER WASTE DISPOSAL LICENSE FEE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 268.80 q1566 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT JUNE '90 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 209.15 1567 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE -SCHOOLS-FIRE DEFT/ROOM RENTAL-HISTORICAL 1668.00 & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61568 D C HEY COMPANY INC -TONER/DEVELOPER-CITY HALL/MAINTENANCE 162.80 AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT 61569 CARLA HOFFER REFUND-SOFTBALL PLAY-OFF FEE 50.00 81570 HOFFERS INC FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 532.50 81571 EARL HOLASEK & SON INC PLANTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 43.50 81572 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC -CONDENSOR VACUUM PUMP REPAIR/BULB/VACUUM 343.90 PUMP RENTAL-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER R1573 HONEYWELL INC -2ND QUARTER '90 PTANT INSTRUMENTATION 3R7R.10 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/CHARTS-WATER DEPT 61574 NANCY HOVEY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 155.00 61575 HUD USER MANUALS-PLANNING DEPT 27.60 61576 ROBERT HYDE PRINTING-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 60.00 61577 THE IMAGE DEVELOPERS DECALS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 250.00 61578 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 -BUS SERVICE-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS/ 548.13 -PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND/AFTERNOON ADVENTURE/ -NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM/FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 61579 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC LAMPS/FLUORESCENT LIGHTS-WATER DEPT 675.49 R1580 INSTY-PRINTS BUSINESS CARDS/STAMPS/FORMS-POLICE DEPT 240.05 81581 INTL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFIC -MANUALS/SUBSCRIPTION-BUILDING INSPECTIONS 48.00 DEPT 4R1R59R AUGUST 7.1990 61662 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC JUIY '90 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 156.00 61583 INTERSTATE DIESEL PRODUCTS INC STARTER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 210.00 615114 GARY ISAACS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL & COORDINATOR/FEES PAID 1211.00 1585 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR& COOLER REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT 65.00 61586 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 33.26 61587 JOHNSON CONTROLS OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER 170.04 61588 JEFFREY JOHNSON SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEPT 136.40 61589 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES/CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION 87.00 61590 KAHNKE BROTHERS INC BLACK DIRT-STREET MAINTENANCE 15.00 61591 KLEVE HEATING & AIRCONDITIONING I -AIR CONDITIONER & INSTALLATION-HOUSING 1500.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 61592 JAMES W KLINE CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 6.00 61593 BRADLEY J KNUTSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 313.50 61594 KOTTKE'S LAWN & LANDSCAPE -1990 MOWING OF CENTER ISLANDS/BOULEVARDS 1050.00 & SIDEWALK RIGHT-OF WAYS-STREET DEPT 61595 KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER -PICK/HANDLES/CUSHIONS/BATfERIES/CLEANING 568.06 -SUPPLIES/FAN/PUMPS/DISHWARE/FRAMES/PAINT -RRUSHRS/WEED KILLER/HOOKS/CHAIN/LIGHT -RUI.RS/EXTENSION CORDS/TRAF RIAWER/PROPANE/ -WIRE/TURING CUTTER/SCREWS-WATER DEPT/ FACILITIES DEPT/STREET DEPT 61596 LYNDELL FREY SOFTBALL& VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 456.25 61597 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS INC RADAR UNIT REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 216.66 i 61598 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY BINDERS-SEWER DEPT 73.61 61599 LAKESIDE FUSEE CORP FLARES-POLICE DEPT 518.25 61600 ROBERT LAMBERT JULY '90 EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 200.00 61601 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER SHRUBS-FORESTRY DEPT 551.50 61602 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -JUNE '90 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 29237.32 LANDFILL ( 1603 LANO EQUIPMENT INC -BOBCAT LOADER UNIT WITH MILLING MACHINE/ 34008.84 BACKHOE/SNOW BUCKET & TRAILER-STREET DEPT 61604 ALDEN LEE EXPENSES-ADULT PROGRAMS 21.00 61605 LEEF BROS INC MATS-LIQUOR STORE 27.20 61606 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC -JUNE '90 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 14021.17 LANDFILL 61607 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC -PAINT/REPAIR & REFINISH BLAZER/DUMP TRUCK 2369.95 & 2 CARS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61608 LEXINGTON CABRIOLE REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 895.03 61609 LION'S TAP -EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT/GIFT CERTIFICATES- 377.68 -ORGANIZED ATHLETICS FOR JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 61610 JAMES R LININGER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 170.50 61611 LYMAN LUMBER CO -TREATED TIMBERS/LUMBER-POLICE DEPT/PARK 156.48 MAINTENANCE 61612 M-V GAS CO SERVICE 130.00 61613 RODERICK MACRAE -PLANTS/TRANSPORTATION/LABELING TOOL/ 125.44 SIGNBOARD MATERIAL-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS 61614 MASTER CRAFT LABELS INC BADGES-FIRE DEPT 450.00 61615 MASYS CORPORATION -AUGUST '90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1295.00 AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 61616 MATRX MEDICAL INC FIRST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 243.25 61617 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO -OXYGEN/CYLINDER HYDROSTATIC TEST CHARGE- 123.00 FIRE DEPT R1618 MEDICINE LAKE LINES -BUS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM/ADULT 194.50 PROGRAMS _ 91403119 aSI/G AUGUST 7.1990 61619 MESSERLI & KRAMER -JUNE '90 SERVICE-MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 5375.00 • COMMISSION ( 61620 METRO PRINTING INC ENVELOPES-POLICE DEFT 183.00 1621 METRO SALES INC -JULY '90 TO JULY '91 MAINTENANCE 1964.95 /TO61622 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS JUNEEMENT'90 SAC NCHHARGESLOPER POLICfi DEPT 61623 VOID OUT CHECK ' 31482.00 61624 DAVID G MEYER 0.00 TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 188.50 61625 MID-CENTRAL INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEFT 271.85 61626 MID-CO SECURITY SYTEMS INC -JULY '90 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 329.17 61627 MIIJFIEST ASPHALT CORP AGREEMENT-POLICE DEFT BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 305.59 61628 MINNEAPOLIS HEALTH DEPARTMENT BLOOD TESTS-POLICE DEFT 120.60 61629 MINNCOMM PAGING -JULY '90 PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT/WATER 58.48 D FT 61630 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -E EXTINQUISHER-POLICB DfiPT/LETTERS/CLEANING 819.73 -SUPPLIES/FLASHLIGHTS/GLOVES/SMOKE BOMB- FIRE DEFT/COUPLINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61631 MINNESOTA JAYCEES ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY CENTER 42.50 81632 MN DEPT OF JOBS & TRAINING -4TH QUARTER 89 EMPLOYMENT SURVEY-PLANNING 100.00 DEFT 61633 MINNESOTA MEDICAL FCUNDATION JUNE '90 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 1662.50 i 61634 MN POLICE & PEACE OFFICES ASSN DUES-POLICE DEFT 15.00 61635 MINNESOTA PRIMA DUES-SAFETY DEFT 15.00 61636 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER JULY '90 BUILDING SURCHARGES 6486.67 61637 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS PRINTING-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 340.00 61638 MINNESOTA WANNER CO DRY GAUGE-PARK MAINTENANCE 10.68 61639 RAY MITCHELL DUNK TANK RENTAL-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 50.00 1640 MODERN EQUIPMENT COMPANY LADDERS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEFT 375.00 :' 1641 MONA MEYER & MCGRATH -JUNE '90 SERVICE-MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 2459.65 ; COMMISSION 61642 MORLEY BITS COMPANY 61642 MOTOROLA INC BUS SERVICE-NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM 50.00 61644 MOI DISTRIBUTING CO RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 1576.14 -FLANGE/SWITCH/V-BELTS-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 268.63 61645 WM MUELLER & SONS INC PARK MAINTENANCE 61646 NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY SAND-SEWER DEFT/PARK MAINTENANCE 166.71 CHEMICALS-WATER DEFT 790.35 61647 NATL ASSN OF POLICE PLANNERS DUES-POLIO DEPT 61646 NATL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN DUES-FIRE DEFT 20.00 61649 NATIONAL AUDIO VISUAL CENTER TRAINING SLIDE KIT/MANUALS-FIRE DEPT 300.0010 4 81650 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE FILM-POLICE DEFT .00 61651 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT T-SHIRTS-PARK MAINT/ORGANIZED ATHLETICS653.76 61652 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEFT 3603.768 1 61653 NCR CORPORATION -CASH TRAY/CASH REGISTER RIBBON-COMMUNITY 101.64 61654 SHANNON NELSON REFUND EFUND-SOFTBALL 61655 NICKELSON PLUMBING & HEATING REFUND-PLUMBING PERMITFF FEE 61656 BETH NILSSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 133.50 50.00 7 61657 DOUG NORD BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 135.00 35.00 61656 JP NOREX INC -SERVICE-ALPINE TRAIL/WINDROW DRIVE & 7485.96 C;IRCLE/HOMEWARD HILLS DRIVE 61659 NORTH STAR TURF INC -CLAMPS/NUTS/BRAKE CABLE/SWITCH/MANUAL- 84.95 INTENANCE 61660 NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE SPIEAKERNKITT--EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCB 1661 NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES INC EXPENSES-FINANCE DEFT 61.50 ' 7018109 6 .50 a5 N AUGUST 7.1990 61662 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT CO I MOTOR/RINGS/GASKET/IMPELLER-WATER DEPT 1754.35 61663 NORTHWOOD GAS CO GAS CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 9.50 _S1664 CHUCK NORTON -SERVICE-INSTALLED COUNTERS/OVEN/COOK TOP 2559.70 -4 HOOD AT 16961 PRAIRIE LANE-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 61665 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT-SEWER DEPT 67.50 61666 OFFICE LIBRARY & MICROGRAPHICS COPY PAPER-WATER DEPT 150.00 61667 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC COMPUTER REPAIR-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 110.00 61668 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC LEVEL REPAIR-STREET MAINTENANCE 11.00 61669 DON OLSON MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 7.75 61870 TRACEY ORR -EXPENSES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/JULY 4TH 47.23 CELEBRATION 61671 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS AUGUST '90 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 161364.68 61672 PAPER WAREHOUSE -PAPER CUPS/TAPE/TAGS/TWINE/NAPKINS/PAPER 93.73 -PLATES/TABLE SKIRTS & COVERS-JULY 4TH -CELEBRATION/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION/ HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61673 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER STRESS TESTS-FIRE DEFT 283.30 61674 PC-TRANS SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTION SE COMPUTER SOFTWARE-STREET DEPT 35.00 61675 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC SPINNER MOTOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 88.10 61876 PEPSI COLA COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 882.00 61677 DAN PERNULA GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 210.00 61678 PERSONNEL POOL SERVICE-FINANCE DEFT 78.40 61679 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 19.50 61680 PETRAM MARKETING -3RD QUARTER '90 FLUSH EQUIPMENT 105.00 i MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINT 61681 THE PINK COMPANIES 2 FILE CABINETS-ASSESSING DEPT 868.00 61682 PITNEY BOWES INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-RECREATION ADMIN 182.18 7683 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -REPAIR HUMIDIFIER/REPLACE POOL PUMP MOTOR/ 473.70 -INSTALLED CIRCUIT & GROUND RECEPTACLES- (OMMUNITY CENTER/LIQUOR STORE 61684 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING -PRINTING-EMPIAYEE BOOKLET/EMPLOYEE 470.25 APPLICATIONS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 61685 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -OIL/SHORTBLOCK & SPARKPLUG FOR LAWN MOWER/ 428.52 -WATER PUMP REPAIR-WATER DEFT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61686 PROGRAM IDEAS BOOK BOOK-SENIOR PROGRAMS 8.00 61687 PRO-TECH ARMORED PRODUCTS -4 BALLISTIC HELMETS-$539.00/2 ARMOR 1367.40 PLATES-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 61688 PROT(Y)L SAWBLADE/KEY-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19.20 61689 GREG PTACIN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 23.00 61690 PTN PUBLISHING COMPANY SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 139.79 , 61891 R & R SPECIALTIES INC -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/TIRE/WATER PUMP/ 449.45 -THERMOSTAT REPLACED/IMPELLER/INSTALLED -HEAD GASKET ON ENGINE & FAN SWITCH- COMMUNITY CENTER 61692 RADIO SHACK CASSETTES/BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT 25.71 61693 RAINBOW FOODS -EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT/OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 119.33 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 61694 RES WATER WELL & PUMP -ABANDON WELL AT 16961 PRAIRIE LANE- 395.00 HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 61695 RFG PET & SUPPLY CO CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 295.40 61698 RICHFIELD BLACKTOP INC SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE 27.75 J. 61697 CITY OF RICHFIELD -ADDITIONAL 1ST QUARTER '90 DISPATCH SERV/ 40329.72 i. -2ND QUARTER DISPATCH SERVICE/1/2 CITY'S -SHARE OF ADAPTIVE RECREATION COORDINATOR 2130734 /85Y i 61698 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO -MUDFIAPS/GASKETS/ELEMENTS/TUBE/REPLACED 4065.38 -ANTIFREEZE & OIL/ELECTRICAL REPAIR- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61699 KAROL ROCKLER MILEAGE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS 40.00 ( .700 ROLLINS OIL CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8423.50 )1701 ROMANTI COMPANY REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 3580.14 61702 RUFF-CUT WEED MOWING SERVICE-FORESTRY DEPT 260.00 61703 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO -OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/AFTERNOON 245.98 PLAYGROUND/ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 61704 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC -BALLOONS/BALLOON CLIPS/FLAGS/BANNERS/ 343.45 -PENNANTS/ARM BANDS-SOCIAL EVENTS/JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 61705 RUSS SANLON REFUND-SOFTBALL PLAY-OFF FEE 50.00 61706 SAND INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 69.30 61707 SAVO IR SUPPLY CO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE 208.00 6170R WILLIAM SCHROEDL MN RIVER CANOE TRIP INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 67.50 61709 WILBUR W SCHULTZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 372.00 61710 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY FLOOR STAND SIGNS-WATER DEPT 208.64 61711 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO TIME RECORDER REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER 85.00 61712 STEVEN R SINELL JULY '90 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 216.50 61713 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC -HATS WITH DEPARTMENT LOGOS-SEWER DEPT/ 284.70 WATER DEPT/STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 61714 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER LETTERHEAD-SAFETY DEPT 45.00 61715 W GORDON SMITH CO GAS/OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINT/PARK MAINT 34.60 61716 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP TEST LIGHT/SCREWDRIVER-EQUIPMENT MAINT 33.30 61717 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC COOLERS/SHOE POLISH-POLICE DEPT 17.93 61718 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC -FILM PROCESSING/BATTERIES/VCR TAPES/LOCKS- 112.24 COMMUNITY CENTER 61719 APRIL SOMMERS BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00 "1720 TOM SOPCZUYK MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 24.00 .721 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER/POLICE 486.88 DEPT/PLANNING DEPT 61722 SPECTRUM SAFETY WATER SAFETY INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 60.00 61723 STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 70.20 61724 STARS RESTAURANT EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 116.67 61725 THE STOCK HOUSE INC FILM-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT 156.44 61726 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -OUTLETS/SWITCHES-EQUIPMENT MAINT/LIGHT 820.59 -BAR/AMMUNITION/IGNITION SECURITY SYSTEM- -POLICE DEPT/BELTS/PISTOL BELTS/HOLSTER/ -HIP EXTENDERS/AMMUNITION POUCH/HANDCUFF -CASES/BELT KEEPERS-POLICE FORFEITURE- DRUGS 61727 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -CARBURETOR/CORE/CLUTCH DISC/WASHER/ 842.50 -PRESSURE GAUGE/0-RINGS/SEALS/STEEL PLATE/ -LINK/HUB CAP/COVER/HOUSING ASSEMBLY/SHIFT -INDICATOR/PUMP ASSEMBLY/RELAY/CUSHIONS/ -LEVER/ROD/BOLTS/SWITCH/CALBH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT 61728 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC WASTE DISPOSAL-OUTDOOR CENTER 83.03 61729 SUPERIOR ROOFING INC -RE-ROOFING AT 16961 PRAIRIE LANE-HOUSING 1585.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 61730 SUTPHEN CORPORATION MAINTENANCE CONTRACT-FIRE DEPT 900.00 81731 NATALIE SWAGGERT JULY '90 EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEFT 200.00 2416827 l AUGUST 7.1990 61732 TARGET STORES -SURGE PROTECTORS-ASSESSING DEPT/ANSWERING 598.01 -MACHINE/CORDLESS TELEPHONE/STEREO SYSTEM- -OIJ'TIXNJR CENTER PROGRAMS/GAMES & TOYS- -PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND/T-SHIRTS/TOYS- ( -NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM/FOLDERS- ELECTIONS 61733 TEAC AMERICA INC DUAL DECK LOGGING RECORDER-POLICE DEPT 12900.00 61734 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP CLEANING SUPPLIES-SEWER DEFT 1230.00 61735 TEJAC ADVERTISING PRINTING-SAFETY DEPT 142.50 61736 TODD ROAD LIGHTING-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 60.00 61737 VALERIE TRADER AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 100.00 61738 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC MARKERS-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 93.25 61739 E JOHN TROMBLEY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 422.00 61740 TURF SUPPLY CO CHEMICALS-PARK MAINTENANCE 896.50 61741 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN/ACETYLENE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 18.22 61742 US WEST CELLULAR CAR PHONE & ANTENNA INSTALLED-POLICE DEFT 225.00 61743 TIM UMPHLETT REFUND-SOFTBALL PLAY-OFF FEE 50.00 61744 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 755.80 61745 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY -FUSES/CAPACITOR/SWITCHING MODULE/SNUBBER 619.19 ASSEMBLY/RECTIFIER ASSEMBLY-WATER DEPT 61746 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEFT 281.48 61747 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEFT 65.00 61748 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -NUTS & BOLTS/WASHERS/STORAGE BIN- 357.32 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 61749 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 172.59 61750 VAUGHN DISPLAY -FLAGS/BANNERS/PENNANTS-RECREATION ALMIN/ 1554.90 SPECIAL EVENTS 61751 VESSCO INC -NUTS/SCREWS/SPRINGS/PLATE/PADDLE/COVER/ 554.96 -COUPLING/WASHERS/MAGNETS/CANNISTER-WATER DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER 61'752 VICOM INC -JULY '90 WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 7.00 COMMUNITY CENTER 61753 VICTORIA REPAIR & MFG BLEACHER REPAIR-PARK MAINTENANCE 96.00 61754 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-POOL OPERATIONS-COMMUNITY CENTER 1029.15 61755 CLARK WALKER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 282.50 61756 KEITH WALL JULY '90 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 200.00 61757 WATER PRODUCTS CO -PVC PIPES/NOZZLE CAP CHAINS/12 1IN 1000 4127.95 -GAL METERS-$1740.00/24 CONNECTIONS/6 -1 1/2" METERS-$1860.00/FLANGES/MEASURING -CHAMBERS-WATER DEPT/NUT& HOSE SPANNER WRENCHES-STREET MAINTENANCE 61758 WATERITE INC -IMPELLAR FOR POOL PUMP/PUMP SEAL- 375.15 COMMUNITY CENTER 61759 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC JUNE '90 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 2161.15 61760 T1ON WRNDLING -POWER SIIPPLIESMICROPHONES-POLICE 349.00 FORFEITURE-DRUGS 61761 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE-RECREATION SUPERVISOR 93.60 61762 WEST WELD -WELDING WIRE/GRINDER/GRINDING WHEELS/CUT- 338.57 ()FF DISCS/HOLDER/COUPLING-EQUIPMENT MAINT 61763 ROBERTA WICK -MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL/PARK RECREATION & 200.00 NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION 6t764 JACK WRIGHT REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 15.78 A1765 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -1ST AID SUPPLIES & KITS-CITY HALL/STREET 447.45 MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 308200'2 / 3qK 61'166 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY -CHOKE & CARBURETOR CLEANER/OIL-EQUIPMENT 83.95 MAINTENANCE 60593 VOID OUT CHECK 10.00- 0890 VOID OUT CHECK 28_80- 049 VOID OUT CHECK 335.89- 1051 VOID OUT CHECK 325.50- 61078 VOID OUT CHECK 80.00- 61112 VOID OUT CHECK 45.86- 61143 VOID OUT CHECK 4296.04- -503814 $1108332.13 i 5qL DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 543955.25 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 43405.57 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 61695.74 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 50186.17 20 CEMETERY OPERATIONS 500.00 21 POLICE DRUG FORFEITURE 1932.20 22 STATE AID CONST 121203.84 73 WATER FUND 66806.94 77 SEWER FUND 203765.33 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 407.84 83 INVESTMENT FUND 114.84 86 PARK PROG-CONTRIBUTIONS 484.06 87 CDBG FUND 6039.70 88 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 7834.65 $1108332.13 t /J51 MEMO DATE: 6/25/90 TO: CARL JULLIE FROM: JIM CLARI@ SUBJECT: HUNTING It appears that the current hunting zones will not require any changes this year. The changes made last year, and agreed to by the landowners, will further limit hunting by elimination of the western area north of Riley Lake and near Rice Marsh Lake. Consequently hunting will only take place in the southwestern corner of the City which I have outlined on the attached map. There were very few complaints regarding hunting last year, most of which were directed at noise or trespass. I was able to check most of the hunting areas last year and found that the landowners were very active in preventing problems. cc file Lo 00 N.. -1.k 009E1 a I . V V� i71 I. ."0.B11-,''11 • 4 4,::. ,... if_ / .1."I'i in .3 t oo \ : l.. 0oZ91 3 \; � / . \� a tiy. ;ill .. O + g . r,, ' 00091 /ash ' — �r S �. ; ........... \ 00991 Ir) % a°- iJJr`itllk�C' 1 y co , \./ rr ,, V 009LI t �� \ CM Lr� a '',.i `_ •.-f\ As.t." 8 ; 1 •• 00491 ( ORDINANCE NO. 27-89 ft ( AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9, SECTION 9.40 RELATING TO THE DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99, WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Chapter 9, Section 9.40 shall be and is amended to read as follows: "SECTION 9.40. FIREARMS REGULATION. Subd. 1. Declaration of Policy. It is hereby found and declared that inasmuch as the City is a developing community wherein the land uses are becoming more intense thus reducing the amount of open land available for the discharge of firearms and dangerous weapons and that it has become necessary to limit the discharge of firearms and dangerous weapons to certain areas in the community in which it will not pose a hazard to the safety of others. Subd. 2. Definitions. Terms used in this Section shall have the following p. meanings: l A. "Approved Archery Ranges" means those ranges which have been r. approved by the City Manager or designee where special target-tipped arrows are used. B. "Dangerous weapon" means any firearm, whether loaded or unloaded, or any device designed as a weapon and capable of producing death or great bodily harm, or any other device or 1. instrumentality which, in the manner it is used or intended to be used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm. C. "Discharge of firearms" means any shooting whether it be for hunting game, target practice or otherwise. D. "Shotgun shotshell" means a shell fired in a shotgun containing multiple shot. E. "Shotgun slug" means a shell fired in a shotgun containing one slug, ball, or other single projectile. Subd. 3. Permit Required for Discharge of Firearms or Dangerous Weapons. No person may fire or discharge a firearm or discharge or use any dangerous weapon within the City without first securing a permit to do so from the Y. A. Areas Where Permitted. (a). A permit may be granted to discharge firearms oe dangerous weapons, except shotguns firing shotgun slugs, only in the following areas: (1) In that part of the City, West and South of the following line: commencing at the intersection of Hennepin County Road 1 and a line ("Line A") parallel to and 1600 feet west of the East line of Sections 27 and 34, Township 116, Range 22, then South along Line A to River Road, then East along River Road to the East line of Section 34, then South along the East line of Section 34 to the southerly line of the City and there terminating; • South of Hennepin County Road 1; North of the southerly line of the City and East of the westerly line of the City. (2) In that part of the City which is Section 18 and Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, for the remainder of 1989 when the landowner is present. (3) In areas approved by the City Council where the issuance of a permit is for the purpose of wildlife management and is in the best interest of public safety. (b). A permit may be granted to discharge shotguns firing shotgun slugs only in the following areas: (1) Commencing at the intersection of Trunk Highway 169- 212 with the westerly border of the City; then easterly along Trunk Highway 169-212 to Riverview Road; then easterly along Riverview Road to the East line of Section 34, Township 116, Range 22, then South along said East line to the Minnesota River, then westerly along the Minnesota River to the westerly border of the City; then along the westerly border of the City to the point of beginning -- in accordance with the following: • (i) Permits for the discharge of shotgun slugs shall not at any time exceed 15 each for that part of the area West and that part of the intersection of Indian Road with Trunk Highway 169-212 extending southerly along Indian Road to a point where Indian Road turns westerly and then South to the Minnesota River. • (1i) The land on which any hol der of a permit may m' discharge a shotgun slug within the area bordering on Highway 169-212 shall be posted with sigdfi prohibiting hunting without permission of the owndir situated not greater than 500 feet from each other. ci B. Application For Permit. A permit may be issued to individuals who comply with the following criteria: (1) Persons over eighteen (18) years of age may apply for an individual permit to discharge a firearms or dangerous weapon. Persons under eighteen (18) years of age may apply for a permit to discharge a firearm or dangerous weapon if at the time of such discharge or use, the youth is accompanied by an adult parent or legal guardian. (2) An application for a permit shall be filed in writing on forms provided by the City and accompanied by a fee determined by City Council resolution. No fee shall be required for a permit for a landowner, his immediate family, or his guests, to discharge a firearm or dangerous weapon on property owned by himself. C. Limitations on Permits. Permits issued for the discharge of firearms or dangerous weapons shall be subject to the following limitations: (1) The property upon which the discharge will occur shall be at least forty (40) contiguous acres. (2) The holder of a permit shall not discharge a shotgun slug within fifteen hundred (1500) feet of a building or a roadway. (3) The holder of a permit shall not discharge a shotgun shotshell within one thousand (1000) feet of a building or a roadway. (4) Permits issued for the discharge of firearms or dangerous weapons shall be limited to the use of bows and arrows, B-B guns, shotgun shells, and shotgun slugs. (5) An individual who is hunting pursuant to a guest permit must be accompanied by the landowner. (6) Permits issued for the discharge of shotgun slugs shall be limited to those times permitted for hunting deer by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Permits issued for the discharge of other dangerous weapons shall be restricted to the calendar year during which the permit was issued. Subd. 4. Approved Archery Ranges. A permit is not required for the discharge of special target-tipped arrows at approved archery ranges. The use of crossbows are prohibited from approved archery ranges. 112i Subd. 5. Cancellation of Permit. A violation of the provisions of is Section or any permit issued hereunder on any property for which the pe has been issued may result in the cancellation of all permits far e discharge of weapons or firearms on such property and the denial of applications for permits on such property. Subd. 6. Lawful Defense of Person, Property or Family. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit any firing of a gun, pistol or other weapon when done in lawful defense of person, property or family or by law enforcement personnel executing their official duties. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 9.99 entitled "Violation A Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of Seotember , 1989, and finally read and adopted and ordered pub ished at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of September 1989. ATTEST: • (COL CityG�lerk Mayor Published in the Eden Prairie News on the 18th day of October , 1989. Mayor Gary roterson Members of therden crairie Council Carl Julie, Manager Gentlemen: I am petitioning the Council to reconsider and allow hunting in the special area, south of Rice Marsh Lake and Riley lake area, for another year. I was pleased,last August I989,that the Council approved for another year limited hunting in this area. At that time, we believed that there would be a possible sale of some land or some development in I990. However, there has been no sale of property and no development, in fact the area remains as it has been for 50 plus years. Another reason to grant an extension is the abundance of small game,which should be controled. I hope it is possible for the Council to re-adjust their decision and. allow hunting in this area for at least another season. since other hunting areas have been defined for some years, I am asking the Council to consider this area on a year to year agreement, until of course, changes occur, such as sale of property and or development. I will be waiting to know about your thoughts on this matter. Yours truly, July 16, 1990 /60 1 aayor Cary Peter.•on Member:: of the Eden rrairie Council Gentlemen: I am contacting you in regard to the possibility of extending the hunting zone for another year. My mother,s farm;ama,is located south of Rice Marsh Lake and northeast of Riley Lake. It was included in the limited zone last year. .e had anticipated the start of development in this area. However, this property and the surrounding area has remained unchanged from last year. I was raised and have hunted on the property all my life, and feel it should be considered for hunting again this fall of 1990. There is an abundance of small game in this area that should be controlled. I"m hoping that you will give this matter your beat consideration. Thank you. Yours truly, July 14, 1990 j ' c.C6Q)14"j"1"-- A -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager DATE: August 2, 1990 RE: Purgatory Creek Flooding Investigation Enclosed is a report prepared by Barr Engineering for the City of Eden Prairie and the Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. This report presents results of a study of the 100- year flood profile in the portions of the Purgatory Creek Watershed where damaged to structures occurred from the July 23,1987 rainfall event. The report also discusses alternatives to provide a higher level of flood protection for existing structures upstream of Mitchell Road in the Purgatory Creek Watershed. This report will provide background for the request by Fairway Woods townhouse owners for additional flood protection. This report was received by the Watershed Board of Managers at their regular meeting August 1, 1990. The Watershed Board has suggested that a joint workshop session be held with the Eden Prairie City Council to discuss this report and water management policies within the City of Eden Prairie and the Watershed District. The study concludes that the 100-year flood profile for Purgatory Creek as previously established by the Watershed District is an accurate profile. The report further concludes that s8veral alternatives exist to increase the level of flood protection for properties upstream of Mitchell Road to include the July 23, 1987 storm event. Cost estimates were prepared for two alternatives: 1. An additional drainage structure under Mitchell Road with a drop inlet and; 2. The lowering of a 300-foot segment of Mitchell Road to produce an emergency overflow below structure elevations. Other alternatives were discussed but cost estimates were not prepared. Staff believes that flood- proofing individual low structures is probably the more cost-effective solution to provide a higher level of protection. Further analysis of these alternatives has not been pursued pending discussion with Council as to the appropriateness of providing higher levels of flood protection in this Watershed and other Watersheds within the City of Eden Prairie. I will be available at the Council meeting August 7 to answer Council inquiries regarding the report. I would also be available by telephone Friday, Monday and Tuesday preceding the Council meeting if council members have questions regarding the report or the current operational problems experienced by the golf course within the last eight-week period. ADG:ssa /, STATUS OF FLOODING INVESTIGATION WITHIN THE RILEY - PURGATORY - BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT I. Introduction The storm of July 20, 1987, followed by the even larger storm of July 23, 1987, caused flooding throughout the metropolitan area. The amount of rain and the resultant flooding was most pronounced in the southwestern portions of the area, including the Purgatory Creek watershed. Figure 1 is the rainfall chart for the July 23 storm event from a gage maintained in Eden Prairie by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The gage measures precipitation with respect to time and the chart points out the extreme intensity of this storm. A plotting of the"storm totals for the July 20 and July 23 rainstorm events is shown on Figures 2 and 3, respectively. Figure 4 is a composite plotting of the total rainfall that occurred from these two rainstorm events. Estimations of the rarity of the July 23 storm alone place the reoccurrence interval of this storm of once in over 10,000 years or, another way to view this rainfall event, is that this was probably (statistically) the most rain that has fallen at one time in this area slice the glacial period. The design event used for major stormwater impoundment facilities (dams) is the probable maximum precipitation. For the Minneapolis-St. Paul area, the probable maximum precipitation is 23.0 inches of rainfall in a 6-hour time period. The July 23, 1987 storm was approximately half the rainfall that would occur for the probable maximum storm. Also in comparison, the Twin Cities area experienced a high intensity rainstorm almost a decade earlier on August 30-31, 1977. At the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, a rainfall of 7.47 inches was recorded in approximately a 4-hour time period. The rainfall from the July 23, 1987 storm was 1.5 times greater than the August, 1977 event in approximately the same time period. 2327053/PURG.WP/TMK 1 • Most of the flooding was not associated with adjacent ponds or streams, but instead was caused by stormwater collecting in the many depressions in urban areas which have surface outlets. As a result of the flooding, President Reagan declared a major disaster for the area, making the Twin Cities eligible for Federal assistance. An Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team was activated to assess the damaged areas and develop recommendations as a basis for further site specific and general program activities. In the Interagency Flood Hazard Mitigation Report for Minnesota, dated August 21, 1987, the report stated the following: "It must be noted that the four streams affected most seriously have had long established inter-governmental watershed organizations. These organizations are the Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission (joint powers agreement) and the Minnehaha Creek, Nine Mile Creek and Riley- Purgatory Creek Watershed Districts (legally established by the State Water Resources Board). The organizations were formed voluntarily (as far back as the 1960s) to accomplish various tasks such as comprehensive basin-wide studies, identify needed drainage improvements, regulate floodplain development (where no local regulations exist) and very importantly, levy taxes for and construct improvements. It was evident from this significant rainfall event that a tremendous amount of damaps were prevented by the sound development policies and capital improvements programs of the communities and watershed organizations in the metropolitan area. These local governmental bodies are to be congratulated." In the Purgatory Creek watershed, the only substantial flooding associated with the creek was upstream of Mitchell Road. There was approximately one half of a foot of flooding in four townhouse units along Edenvale Golf Course. These townhomes are about 1.5 feet above the 100-year flood level. Also, approximately 1.6 feet of flooding occurred in the single family structure at 15601 Hillcrest Court along the creek. Hillcrest Court is located approximately 1 mile upstream of Mitchell Road. In contacting the City of Eden Prairie, this house was constructed in early 1973 prior to the adoption of the Watershed District's overall plan and floodplain regulations. 2327053/PURG.WP/TMK 2 However, even if this house were constructed according to the Watershed's floodplain regulations, there still would have been approximately 0.4 foot of flooding. Inundation of homes also occurred in the Eden Lake-Neill Lake area as a result of the rainfall during the week of July 19. The majority of the damage that occurred within the watershed was the result of localized flooding, within street intersections and backyard depression areas, and the failure of retaining walls as a result of saturated soil conditions. Because of this flooding and concerns expressed by both the City of Eden Prairie and area residents, a reanalysis of the management elevations of the Watershed District's flood zone envelope was requested along with evaluation of the possibility of providing a higher level of flood protection for more extreme events. The purpose of this report is to summarize this analysis. II. Background The Overall Plan for the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed District was published in August, 1973. The Overall Plan presented a 100-year flood zone for the management of development adjacent to the creek. This flood envelope provides the degree of protection as State law requires for development adjacent to major rivers and streams (1969 Minnesota Floodplain Management Act). The District's flood envelope has been based on complete urbanization of the watershed using the municipal land use plans as presented in each municipality's comprehensive development plan. In addition, development adjacent to the creek and lakes must be established at a minimum elevation that is 2 feet above the calculated 100-year frequency flood elevation. This is to allow for approximations in the analysis and unforseen occurrences e.g., possibility of outlets becoming plugged with ice or debris resulting in higher water levels and/or higher water elevations that could result for storms of greater intensity than the design rainstorm event. The four Edenvale townhomes that were impacted by the July 23, 1987 rainstorm are between 1.6 and 1.7 feet above the calculated flood elevation. The home at 15601 Hillcrest Court, constructed in early 1973, is 0.8 feet above the flood elevation. Since the original analysis of the District's flood envelope, additional topographical maps (2-foot contour interval) have been published. 2327053/PARG.WP/TMK 3 p. 1 This additional information should be incorporated into the Watershed District's management plan. It may also be feasible to provide a higher level of protection than 100-year along the creek and adjacent to the lakes at a reasonable cost. For these reasons, a reanalysis of the management plan along Purgatory Creek was undertaken. This report will present the status of that investigation. The first phase of this investigation was to reanalyze the 100-year flood to determine the need to revise the published floodplain elevations as a result of additional, updated data being available. It was found that the current flood envelope used for management purposes is accurate and that revisions or modifications were and are not necessary. The second phase of the investigation viewed more severe events than the 100- year frequency storm, and investigated possible improvements to reduce flood damage without causing adverse impacts downstream of these improvements. For this purpose, the flooding caused by the storms of July 20 and 23, 1987 was used. III. Methods of Investigation Y For the review of the 100-year management envelope, an entirely new model was set up and analyzed using the Barr Hydrograph method and the precipitation frequency curves shown on Figure 5. This model made usa of the best information available in terms of topographic and land use information. As in previous studies, the land use assumption for the 100-year flood is • complete development. For this reason there is little change in land use projections between this and past studies. Topographic information, however, is now more detailed. With this additional information, a more precise hydrologic model was developed. This included the generation of detailed values for flood storage available along the creek and adjacent to the lakes and detailed information regarding the hydraulic capacity of the existing stormwater management systems. ( 2327053/PURC.WP/THM 4 i i , 1 For more severe flooding conditions, the storms of July 20 and 23, 1987 were itused. The model previously used for the 100•year analysis was modified to make it appropriate for existing conditions. Composite hyetographs for the July, 1987 storms were applied to the model to generate hydrographs. These hydrographs were then routed through the watershed. This model gave surprisingly good agreement with actual recorded elevations at various locations and times along Purgatory Creek and within the Neill Lake area. The next step of the analysis was to evaluate possible improvements to provide a greater level of protection along the creek system. The model was used to determine the impacts that possible modifications to the existing system would have on both conditions upstream and downstream of Mitchell Road. Improvements analyzed would not change or alter the existing 100-year management envelope but as previously stated, would provide a greater level of protection for more severe rainstorm events. This analysis was also undertaken in the Neill Lake area with the same objectives pursued. IV. Discussion of Results The 100-year analysis indicated that modifications to the Watershed District's floodplain are not necessary for management purposes. The analysis also indicated that the flood elevations calculated for the lakes in the Neill Lake storm sewer system are appropriate and that modifications for management purposes are not necessary. The July 1987 rainstorms resulted in water surface elevations in the Eden Lake area that were approximately 3.1 feet above the 100-year flood elevation. This was the result of not only the high intensity rainstorms of this week, but that the piped outlet for Eden Lake was inadvertently plugged with a plywood board. This restriction resulted in no piped outflow discharge from the lake for both the July 20 and 23 rainstorms. Our analysis considered both cases of the resultant high water elevation in this basin with and without an outlet. Without an outlet, the high water resulted in a surface overflow occurring from Eden Lake to Neill Lake. With the same rainstorm amounts but with the outlet functioning during both the July 20 and 2327053/PURC.WP/Ttq( 5 23 events, this would have resulted in a water surface elevation that is 0.2 itfeet lower than what occurred. The restriction that was in place therefore did not have a large impact on the level that occurred in Eden Lake as a result of these rainstorm events. As requested by both the City of Eden Prairie and the Edenvale Townhouse Association, possible improvements to the existing system were investigated to provide a greater level of protection for structures in the Edenvale Golf course area for events in excess of the 100-year frequency event. Several alternatives were evaluated including two that would increase the flow through Mitchell Road for extreme events. These two alternatives were designed such that the 100-year flood elevations would remain the same, preserving storage for the 100-year flood. The first alternative involves an additional culvert and a drop inlet structure with a 40-foot long weir at . elevation 841, the established 100-year flood elevation (see Figure 6). The estimated cost to implement this alternative is $130,000. The second alternative would be to lower a portion of Mitchell Road to elevation 841 so that excess flows would flow over the road. Approximately 300 feet of Mitchell Road would have to be disturbed at an estimated cost of $115,000. Both of these alternatives would have no impact on 100-year flood elevations either upstream or downstream of Mitchell Road. For the July 1987 storm, the flood elevation just upstream of Mitchell Road would be lowered 1.5 feet and the flooding of structures along Edenvale Golf Course and Hillcrest Court would be eliminated. The elevations at the channel restrictions downstream would increase slightly. This increase would have no adverse effects on existing structures along the creek. A third alternative could be flood-proofing around the low homes. This would consist of a system of berms and drainage structures that would prevent the floodwaters from entering homes for storm events in excess of the 100-year event. This would not lower the flood elevation at Mitchell Road and would cause no impact on flood elevations downstream. qq? Other possible alternatives would be to purchase flood insurance or do nothing at this time. The cost of the first two alternatives, as well as the 2327053/PURG.WP/TMK 6 rarity of the July 1987 storm, may support considering one of these later alternatives. The cost of purchasing flood insurance by these property owners appears to be the most cost-effective means for providing a greater level of protection for the events in excess of the 100-year frequency event. As a result of this rainstorm event, the Cities of Edina and Bloomington are modifying existing stormwater systems where flood waters can be conveyed from areas of privately owned property where flooding occurred to publicly owned . land. The City of Bloomington has also modified the design criteria used to provide a factor of safety for a 100-year event of a 25 percent increase in design storm volume thereby providing a uniform level of protection throughout the City. With the present policy of providing a safety factor of 2 feet above 100-year flood elevation, the comparison with the Bloomington plan would result in the homes along the golf course being built 1.0 feet above the flood elevation. The current policies of the City and District in this instance is more restrictive than the criteria adopted by Bloomington. The City of Eden Prairie may wish to consider revising current design criteria to provide a greater factor of safety, however, this criteria must then be applied uniformly throughout the City. This could result in some significant modifications to the current management plan. A benefit/cost ratio should be reviewed prior to the consideration of design criteria modifications because such changes may not be economically feasible. V. Summary The flooding investigation for Purgatory Creek has shown that the revised 100-year floodplain is accurate. In addition, all existing homes are above the 100-year flood elevations. The investigation of the July 1987 flooding shows that improvements are possible for that storm. While it might be desirable to have a higher level of flood protection than 100-year recurrence, the July 1967 events are not necessarily the appropriate design criterion. The current policy of a 2-foot safety factor above the 100-year flood elevation is a very common criteria utilized throughout the State. It represents an affordable solution to a common problem. A storm of greater intensity than the July event could occur. The July 23, 1987 storm was f 2327053/PURG.WP/TMK 7 • approximately half the rainfall that would occur for the probable maximum storm. To provide a level of protection for such an event requires that fairly substantial funds are necessary to protect a small number of homes from such rare events. While it may be possible to provide a higher level of protection than 100-year, such protection must be uniformly applied. a 2327053/PURC.WP/Tt9C 8 „ , -Y1 , ,,,; ul®! i,; .,! ....T-.7.y :gig . IV 70i11,� • 1-j - cc cc ■o1s1 ,� / 1. _ woc a 1/+�a/ �;�m . niiip-r. 0. ..' { 1111�_ !®®� !r/ Ay�' CNI -. 41 1 H r cl N 'I' . ---:....• ,millananin 'H- ' -- : .'+--'-- ''WOi•''II . -.' U -- •0 f _- . ,---1--- 7” .1°1°. . ,-4, ' , • .tt'W S3HONI P 3 3 1 1 ____.7....._:____czz__________.1. r-------L'-'---7 ily•.11 .Ns.60•11 , aArli I . I90 __ _..__ , MI Olt .... A CO ,•Crs ,. .43,,,, ...NM •••k•a, .0000000000 4!' .., .• n —.. 1 •••IN oo I . 1 .11,02:101..1 h,i711 ft.,. . .....11.7.1111.1 0...„, w ASIONGT011 CO '"....• i 180.1,••••• - '.. ... •""........... ..... .... ',re TIM C ti FO--.—.....-,:..„ 3rZ,ar ..• ."" .., tviCCUr• ,,,,...c• min,' -'0 ...4. ... .ALISIIV CO I I w 1•,',Nlv....t:r'o.. .., •0. 1 .., ,s 1.14;. ' * • ._. 009....... ,4.. AL_ 7. _ ., .„, i oreessuo• I i —1.... '.... -. .' --. - - ^ **. Mr .. •- .) .".':t. fi.=.1!" r,I; ,,,. , r..,--- . i I I ,....0.„ ..„..... .,,.,—,. ttt" , ..... ............"--...V 1 J .111 1 L •...a,. '4......., ' . ..6.6 i 2011. ...‘ OAKOTA CO I .. 111114"'I •••••• "..7 ,,,,,,. .1, •-'‘''.......,. '''''''''.. •••••••,.,..... ..7.... 10411i/P ,•0{1.4+44.,C• , ,...l illiems .11. 1..:".4.1=.• ' , ... -' I i ....•••••. L , -, 01.01.1.1 1 •.irr..1.8 ! I I,•••••••• ,..... SCOTT CO. ,•. , -.....—J -. ————--———————— , _...141.L.P.m. I .. ' .....P.M. • t S 0.•Lan . „........., I ,.H... .•',A Tx% «MOJA , • C.-...:—, ! t .....-4, .,0,....ts 1 “Fla.,k,a, nt,a, . -.--... ..,..—......—. .4.7$ ..7.1-14r-- 47-.,•• , a " 1 .a,,,,, ...,•••......•1, L. .. ., ....,_.1 TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Source: DNR, Division of Waters and State Climatology Office ( Figure 2 JULY 20-21, 1987 STORM TOTAL PRECIPITATION Precipitation Started Between 6:00 and 8:00 pm. Most Precipitation had Fallen by 1:00 to 2:00 am. the Following Morning e i KN N,NI .NON. co. nil- . I L.N. ...NI i ,r?" .,..; • ...,. ' • • ••• .. 7 ..w...4 ..«N I.ATI u. a. MN moms n.K a Won ... — I • NAININGTON ..,,N,.1• <LL,L .sou i,N, N• '�µ.�'—`� ., t.4• ___,.NL "N CO. .,, «L.w :.x✓I,., -. .,... • .NK. , \..•,«.. K.. N, tom,_' i 40 .• . r— ' ...sly• • �� r.-- •4{.,1...1 ,.N ,. *' ' . ,,,«, 48 r...,:: . 's ti...., �O ,.,...will- WINO all __ k:. s -ire, •. :. ...-r ufL ar. - -117" j L - c.,rvu co. , ,... .e.N...w '=a..... S , c °°'+ iiiiimmollI 01.1 L- " . ":.,1. w N.... -,W. ...,.., I ', , OCCTT CO. ' ••• `' �,,• Lore....e •• ..I.: ' ..«,.,• us n.., -L,,. .e"... 1 ......,e, i aN.. oi. ..m«....y :01.11— ) ! 47- 1 .. ,o TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Source: Earl Kuehnast & Jim Zandlo, DNR, Division of Waters and State Climatology Office Figure 3 JULY 23-24, 19137 STORM TOTAL PRECIPITATION Precipitation Started Between 6:00 and 7:00 pm. Most Precipitation had Fallen by 1:00 to 2:00 am. the Following Morning a i '; i i —-—7—-----------,------- I . .1'.r..- -71 ....».N, ; ,' ` 1 Y!1 M.... . ,l.". �'� u •L.. • IV CMS»N Aer " .... of ar. 111: CAPVIO CO - •OYW+Prtr•, rt,m N•! r. L•_ -- -- w • ...c::. ,. .. L-- ...,.... »� .... » ,» 1 I SCOTT CO. "I-. T1 I. K.wu.. .,1.. Alva.r.. ....1.. {.,L•O .•.. . JOY"IIR.,� '• 1 ! r� ,-Ta 1 1 G.. TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA Source: DNR, Division of Waters and State Climatology Office ( Figure 4 JULY 20-21 AND JULY 23-24, 1987 COMBINED HEAVY RAINS • f f : e _ _ _ } o -- . - - __ _ 0.0. 0r -- --\-=1 1 -- lh '--_-- _ .117 .X_ _< ..-----1 -_- -���r'-.� -; -• 3_ � in s. 2 . ---29M6.4 lalt‘lik In---- -45'I' Miniain 1 Mt 7:--=-" -- cz Tr ___ ___ ____ _ .__74‘kikiL ilik la 1=-7 : • Illi I= I co in Tr f0 ,- e h N O . aayouI u PluMil r d co d N CO 2 N o— ) I olo I I m I • 11 A - I O C v N! I t C r J i a u • ao ¢ N IW -- -1 a; I W w / —II �e W t � W 1\ Ce I.. ; . 3 < C LL • o ' f II - N o • n i a) CO IV rN `..— c Ip O V MW - . O N \ N I N G I�x _ CO • K . L., I „ d I W V C O V rL u 2 v d V I. 0 O? C C L • 6 EDEN LAND CORP. - Metro Office Park - Bloomington. Minn. 55420 - Tel. 861-4533 Al March 9, 1971 Purgatory Creek Drainage District c/o Mr. John Dickson Barr Engineering Company 6800 France Avenue, South Minneapolis,.Minnesota 55435 Gentlemen: • In behalf of Eden Land Corporation, I am requesting a permit for the installation of a creek crossing of Purgatory Creek at Mitchell Road extended northerly from TH #5. Mitchell Road will be extended northerly to connect with Baker Road as shown on the enclosed Land Use Plan for EDE_VALE. We desire to start con- struction on the roadway as soon as the Village has completed the sewer and water installation on Mitchell Road, across Purgatory Creek. We propose to install a 54" R.C.P. Pipe Culvert with end sections according to the criteria established by Barr Engineering and the drainage district. I have discussed the frequency of flooding of the golf course property northwest of this crossing and Eden Land Corporation agrees to this temporary ponding of water which will result from the installation of the 54" R.C.P. I would appreciate receiving permission to install this culvert so that the work can be coordinated with the sewer and water installation by the Village. Yours truly, /2e-,A21% Donald R. Peterson President DRP/js Enclosure RECEIVED MAR 101970 "PR ENGR. CO. , 1 t` • Riley- Purgatory Creel: Watershed District .7)1.. 1 o .---I. , :. :G COU:.TY ROAD .t „may EDE PRA.:c,E. MI\hESOTA 55341. �� % ` I. , , March 3, 1971 N. ti p.. Mr. Donald Peterson Eden Land Corporation 7850 Metro Parkway Bloomington, Minnesota Dear Mr. Peterson:, At your request, we have reviewed our computations to determine the 100-year frequency flood plain and the culvert size for the proposed Mitchell Road crossing. We are recommending that the flood plain up- stream of the proposed crossing be set at elevation 840 and downstream at 835. We are recommending that this crossing restrict the flow to fully utilize the low area proposed for a golf course as well as the low area North of Valley View for the storage of flood waters. The re- commended size for this crossing is a 54" reinforced concrete pipe or a 60" corrugated metal pipe. The invert of the crossing should set at elevation of 830, which we believe is the existing stream bed elevation at the proposed crossing location. The overall plan for the watershed district has not been completed and therefore the flood levels stated above are only tentative. However, we believe these elevations will be the same when the overall plan is adopted. We would appreciate receiving final copies of your plans for review as soon as they are completed. If you have any questions con- * cerning any of this information, please contact us. Yours truly, BARR ENGINEERING/� COMPANY � - John D. Dickson Approved by the Board of Managers RILEY-PURGATORY CREEKWATERSHED DISTRICT K/�d0.c0o�- %egziA,----. President Date: 3 /04'1/9 7/ cc: Ray Peterson Frederick Richards ( George Hite MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager Carl J. Jullie SUBJECT: Special Meeting Schedule DATE: July 24, 1990 The following is a suggested schedule for special City Council meetings to address various matters: 1. Monday, August 6, 7:30 PM Re: Joint Meeting with Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission (already scheduled) 2. Tuesday, August 14, 5:0D PM Re: 5:00 - 6:00 PM Community Survey 6:00 -.B:00 PM City Hall Options and Goals for City Manager 3. Thursday, August 16, 5:00 - 8:00 PM Re: '91 City Budget 4. Tuesday, August 21, 6:00 - 7:15 PM Re: Black & Veatch Water System Report 5. Thursday, August 23, 5:00 - 8:00 PM Re: '91 City Budget At our next regular Council meeting on August 7, the Council can set this schedule as proposed or modified as the Council may decide. Some alternative dates for such meetings are suggested as follows: Wednesday, August 15, 5:00 - 8:00 PM (or other time) Monday, August 20, " " " " Wednesday, August 22, " HUHU Tuesday, August 26, " untou Wednesday, August 29, " " " " to Thursday, August 30, " " CJJ:jdp MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: August 3, 1990 SUBJECT: Tree Waste Disposal In a memo from the Waste Management Commission, dated July 2, 1990, reference was made to the disposal of tree waste and exploring the possibilities related to the City operating a chipping site. BACKGROUND The City has past experience in the operation of a tree chipping site which was operated in conjunction with the diseased tree program. A site was operated at Flying Cloud Landfill in which trees that were diseased and cut down by homeowners were hauled by the City to the site and the City contracted with Hennepin County Public Works to have the tree debris chipped. The operation of this site worked to the advantage of the three parties involved; namely, the City, tree hauling was held to a minimum in terms of distance and time spent hauling debris, the County because the trees did not have to be hauled to Maple Grove their volume was reduced at the County disposal site, and the Landfill operators which experienced a decrease in the amount of waste material placed in the landfill. During operation of the utilization site the landfill operators provided security and collected fees for tree dumping or purchase of woodchips. PRESENT CONDITIONS At the current time, staff has been able to locate some disposal sites for yard/tree waste materials; however, none of these are located close to Eden Prairie. The first burning site is being operated by a tree service near Watertown, Minnesota, another tree service is operating a chipping site south of Shakopee, and the third site is being operated by Hennepin County exclusively for the chipping and utilization of diseased elm and oak trees. There may be additional sites; however, the staff was unable to confirm their location or operational procedures. In addition, the number of private waste haulers and tree firms will dispose yard/tree waste in other ways such as hauling and/or chipping on site. The City of Ramsey, in Anoka County, has been operating a decen- tralized brush chipping demonstration program, which was partially funded by the Metropolitan Council. This program operates in the following manner: 1; 1. Residents wanting to utilize the program sign up in the spring prior to the removal of any limbs or branches from their yards. 2. The City hires a contractor who will work in the city during the summer months and do on site chipping at individual homeowner properties. 3. The city is divided into a number of sections and as these areas are scheduled for chipping, program participants are notified by the city as to what week to place their material at the curb side, so that the independent contractor can proceed from property to property throughout the entire route area. 4. Property owners are informed that the contractor will chip material six inches in diameter or less and the property owner has the option of having the chipped material hauled away from their property or the contractor will leave the woodchips, so that the property owner can use them as they wish. 5. At the present time, this program is costing between $24,000 and $30,000 per year and the property owners may pay charges in the future if the program ends up being too expensive. TREE WASTE DISPOSAL OPTIONS At the current time, the City provides for the hauling and disposal of diseased elm and oak trees, as it has for the past fourteen years. The operation of this particular program has enabled property owners to reduce the amount of expenditure related to their diseased trees, since they did not have to pay the contractor for hauling and disposal of the diseased wood. In an average year, once the homeowner calls for pickup of the diseased tree(s), it is normally hauled away within five to seven working days. This summer, however, with the large amount of storm damage to trees that occurred on Sunday, July 8th, the pickup has been running between seven and eleven working days. One side note to this is that the City hauled storm damage debris from approximately 110 properties. With the current level of truck j usage and hauling, the staff would not recommend as one of the possible options that we consider hauling yard/tree waste with our current truck to a disposal site. With this in mind, the staff feels that there are basically three alternatives for consideration j. related to yard/tree waste. These are: 1 1. Use of private contractors. 6 2. Residents haul to City operated site. 3. Residents haul to commercially operated site outside the city. 1 a ti i I IT 1. Private Contractor - The staff has done some very preliminary calculations as to the costs associated with utilization of a private contractor similar to that which is being done by the City of Ramsey. Based on a rate of $60/hour for two operators and the associated chipping equipment, it is estimated that the City would expend about $40,000 per year. Basically, a collection program utilizing a contractor would have to be administered within the City Hall whereby property owners could call to receive information regarding the specifics of hauling, as well as to request that the chipping be done. Exact details of such a program would have to be written and published for property owners, so that problems and misunderstandings could be minimized. 2. Residents haul to a City operated facility - A suggestion was made by the Waste Management Commission that the City operate a tree chipping site at which residents would be able to haul their yard/tree waste to for disposal. The staff has explored several options as to the operation of such a site and has determined that the most plausible way of operation is to have a fenced area that can be secured so that the materials being brought into the site can be regulated by a gatekeeper. The equipment that the City would need to use on this size of chipping material would require the purchase of a self powered chipper that mounts on the front of a rubber tired loader. This particular piece of equipment would cost approximately $80,000 and, although, it does chip material completely, it results in a chip that would more suitable to composting that it would be for use as plant mulch or trail surface material. The staff estimates that the initial start-up and operations costs for a chipping site that would be operated by the City would exceed $120,000 for the initial year. This cost could be offset somewhat by fees charged for those using the site for disposal; however, it is unlikely that these fees would cover 50% of the total operation costs. 3. Residents haul to a commercial site - The City has recently been contacted by a tree firm operating a yard and waste disposal facility south of Shakopee. According to the owner, Dennis Collins of AAA Tree Service, he will currently accept brush and tree debris from Eden Prairie residents at a charge of $4.25/yard. When you go on the basis that a standard size pickup truck hauls approximately 3 yards of material, this would be the equivalent of $12.75/pickup truck load. The site he operates is open six day per week, for 10 hours a day. One additional option that he mentioned is that if the City chose to subsidize its residents by paying him $.50/ capita, he would charge Eden Prairie residents $2.50/yard for disposal of yard and tree waste. ddd! RECOMMENDATIONS At the current time, the staff has not received a large amount of requests for assistance with the disposal of tree trimming and everyday yard waste. The current program of hauling diseased trees, as well as storm damaged trees, is working well and can be covered by the current budget expenditures. When evaluating the above options, it becomes apparent that it would be extremely expensive for the City to operate a site or to hire a private contractor to take of City wide disposal. Therefore, at the present time, the staff would recommend that the City Council consider option number three placing the responsibility on the individual residents to haul their material to a commercial site, such as the one it Shakopee. If the City Council wanted to subsidize and reduce the cost to its residents, it could appropriate between $19,000 and $20,000 to do so. Presently, the staff does not have a good estimate as to the volume of material that is generated each year and, therefore, it is unclear whether or not the subsidy would directly benefit a large number of Eden Prairie residents. Staff does feel that the free enterprise system, in this case, appears to be the best alternative and will continue to monitor the costs associated with yard waste management and advise the City Council of any changes or need the to explore other options. SF:mdd waste/10 City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 1, 1990 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Request Regarding 1990 Shooting Zones B. Request from the Fairway Woods Condominium Association regarding ,103 Mitchell t�oad Culvert , VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment to fill an unexpired term ending February M. 1983 on the Historicirl altural Commission B. Appointment to fill an unexpired term ending February M. 1992 on the Parks Recreation & Naturaltfesources Commission X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. Set Special City Council Meetings B. Report of City Manager C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Yard/Tree Waste Disposal •-y >h F. Report of Finance Director G. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Receive Bids and Award Contract for Utility and Street Improvements within Bluffs East Tfil Addition, I.C.. 52-195 XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT ( AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING CITY COUNCIL AND EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MONDAY, AUGUST 6, 1990 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE COUNCILMEMBERS: Gary D. Peterson, Mayor; Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Douglas Tenpas COMMISSION MEMBERS: Raiford Baker, chairperson; Karon Joyer, Paul Karpinko, David Kuechenmeister, Pat Richard, Del Vanderploeg y, COMMISSION STAFF: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources 7:30 I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 2. 1990 7:35 IV. DISCUSSION WITH CITY COUNCIL - CONTINUED FROM JULY 10. 1990 1. Discussion of the City Survey 2. Future Park Bond Referendum 3. Landscaping Medians r 4. Trails and Sidewalk Policy 5. Other Issues Proposed by Council and Commission Members VI. OLD BUSINESS None 9:00 VII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from Eden Prairie Boosters 9:10 VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Reports of Director of PRNR 1. Resolution No. 90-187/Snowdrifters Snowmobile Trail B. Reports of Manager of Recreation Services 1. Centex Care License Reguirements 9:25 IX. ADJOURNMENT i A ' DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. EDEN PRAIRIE RESIDENTIAL 3128 Dean Court QUESTIONNAIRE Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Hello, I'm of Decision Resources, Ltd., a nationwide polling firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the City of Eden Prairie to speak with a random sample of residents ti about issues facing the city. The survey is being taken because your city representatives and staff are interested in your opinions and suggestions. I want to assure you that all individual responses will be held strictly confidential; only summaries of the entire sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE) 1. Approximately how many years LESS THAN ONE YEAR. ...12% have you lived in Eden Prairie? ONE OR TWO YEARS 20% THREE TO FIVE YEARS 30% SIX TO TEN YEARS 18% ELEVEN - TWENTY YEARS 13% OVER TWENTY YEARS 6% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% 2. In what city and/or state was your immediately prior residence located? EDEN PRAIRIE, 2%; RURAL MINNESOTA, 7%; MINNEAPOLIS, 13%; OUT OF STATE, 28%; BLOOMINGTON, 9%; NORTHERN HENNEPIN, 5%; SOUTHERN HENNEPIN, 25%; DAKOTA COUNTY, 4%; REST OF METRO AREA, 7%. 3. As things now stand, how long LESS THAN ONE YEAR 6% in the future do you expect to ONE TO TWO YEARS...., 9% live in Eden Prairie? THREE TO FIVE YEARS...13% SIX TO TEN YEARS 10% OVER TEN YEARS 43% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 18% 4. Thinking back to when you moved to Eden Prairie, what factors were most important to you in selecting the city? NO ANSWER, 2%; LOCATION, 27%; JOB, 15%; FAMILY HERE, 6%; SCHOOLS, 11%; NICE SUBURB, 6%; HOUSING, 23%; RURAL-SMALL TOWN, 7%; NATURAL BEAUTY, 5%. 5. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT 52% life in Eden Prairie -- excellent, GOOD 46% good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR 2% POOR 1% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% When residents are asked what comes to mind when they think of their community, many things can occur to them. Minneapolis residents think of their lake system. Chaska residents talk about their small town ambience. Eagan residents talk about growth, while Bloomington residents mention the Strip or the Mega 1 . i Mall. 1 8. What image comes to mind when you think about Eden Prairie? NOTHING, 7%; OPEN SPACES, 16%; GROWTH, 12%; PARKS, 15%; I PEOPLE, 4%; WELL PLANNED, 5%; UPWARDLY MOBILE, 8%; NICE 4 SUBURB, 9%; PEACEFUL, 6%; FOR FAMILIES, 6%; TAXES, 4%; NATURAL BEAUTY, 4%; LOCATION, 2%; SCHOOLS, 2%; LANDFILL, 2%; SCATTERED, 1%. 9. What do you like MOST about living in Eden Prairie? DON'T KNOW, 3%; LOCATION, 32%; PEOPLE, 9%; PARKS, 10%; ALL, i 5%; PEACEFUL, 9%; NATURAL BEAUTY, 6%; SUBURBAN, 6%; RURAL, 8%; SCHOOLS, 4%; NEIGHBORHOOD, 6%; WELL RUN, 2%. 10. What do you like LEAST about it? : DON'T KNOW, 8%; NOTHING, 9%; GROWTH, 11%; TAXES, 26%; ROADS, 8%; LANDFILL, 7%; TRAFFIC, 10%; NO SHOPPING, 5%; PEOPLE, 4%; CITY GOVERNMENT, 2%; LOCATION, 4%; SERVICES, 2%; NO IDENTITY, 1%; SCATTERED, 3%. 1, 11. Now, which of these two statements STATEMENT A 46% comes closest to your feelings? STATEMENT B 33% 1 A. I have real roots in this BOTH (VOL) 11% i community. NEITHER (VOL) 10% I B. Eden Prairie is just a place DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% to live. I'd be just as happy 1 elsewhere. 1 12. How would you rate the general EXCELLENT * 22% sense of community among Eden GOOD 59% Prairie residents -- excellent, ONLY FAIR 16% good, only fair, or poor? POOR 2% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2% i 13. Thinking about your ties to the CITY 60% community, do you identify more SCHOOL DISTRICT 26% closely with the City or the BOTH EQUALLY (VOL.) ....5% School District? NEITHER (VOL.) 8% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% } 14. Do you feel a stronger attachment EDEN PRAIRIE 25% to the City of Eden Prairie, the METRO AREA 29% Metropolitan Area, or your NEIGHBORHOOD 40% i immediate neighborhood or sub- ALL EQUALLY (VOL.) 3% division? NONE OF ABOVE 35- i DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% 15. Do you think of Eden Prairie more CITY 7% ) as a city or urban area, a rural RURAL 6% i area, a suburban area, or a small SUBURBAN 83% 1 town? SMALL TOWN 3% COMBINATION (VOL.) 2% 2 i 4 Changing topics.... 16. Would you favor or oppose an in- FAVOR 36% crease in city property taxes if OPPOSE 54% it were needed to maintain city DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 10% services at their current level? 17. Do you consider property taxes in COMPARATIVELY LOW 1% Eden Prairie to be comparatively ABOUT AVERAGE 20% low, about average, relatively RELATIVELY HIGH 50% high or excessively high? EXCESSIVELY HIGH 20% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 10% As you may know, property taxes are divided between the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, and local school districts. 18. For each dollar of property taxes UNDER TEN PERCENT 4% you pay, about what percentage do 10% TO 20% 40% you think goes to city govern- 21% TO 30% 21% ment? (READ CHOICES, IF NEEDED) 31% TO 40% 6% 41% TO 50% 4% 51% TO 60% 1% OVER SIXTY PERCENT 0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ..25% As you may know, the City share of the property tax in your school district is. about twenty percent. 19. During the past few years, has INCREASED 43% the City's tax rate increased, DECREASED 9% decreased, or remained about the ABOUT THE SAME 25% same? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . * 22% For your information, the City's tax rate has remained relatively stable during the past few years. 20. When you consider the property EXCELLENT 13% taxes you pay and the quality GOOD 59% of city services you receive, ONLY FAIR 17% would you rate the general value POOR 2% of city services as excellent, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8% good, only fair, or poor? I would like to read you a list of a few city services. For each one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor? EXC GOOD FAIR POOR D.K. 21. Police protection? 42% 48% 6% 1% 4% 22. Fire protection? 36% 53% 3% 1% 7% 23. City street repair and maintenance? 10% 60% 26% 3% 1% 3 EXC GOOD FAIR POOR D.K. 24. Sewers and water? 13% 68% 9% 3% 7% 25. Snow plowing? 30% 55% 11% 2% 3% 26. Animal control? 15% 66% 9% 4% 7% 27. Park maintenance? 38% 57% 4% 0% 6% 28. Trail maintenance? 34% 48% 5% 1% 12% 29. Recreational programs? 27% 57% 5% 1% 10% 30. Street lighting? 7% 67% 18% 4% 5% 31. Utility billing? 6% 66% 13% 1% 15% 32. Building inspection? 7% 40% 9% 3% 41% 33. City liquor stores? 5% 46% 12% 4% 33% 34. Nuisance code enforce- ment? 4% 58% 7% 2% 29% 35. Property valuation and assessment? 2% 51% 17% 6% 24% IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" IN QUESTIONS #21-35, ASK FOR EACH: 36. Why did you rate as (only fair/poor)? NOT APPLICABLE, 32%; LOOSE ANIMALS, 5%; NOT SUFFICIENT, 17%; COST/OVER-VALUED, 6%; POOR MAINTENANCE, 12%; THREE OR MORE, 13%; MAINTENANCE+INSUFFICIENT, 6%; COULD IMPROVE, 3%; MAINTENANCE+COST, 4%; LIQUOR INAPPROPR- IATE, 1%; SCATTERED, 1%. 37. Other than voting, do you feel YES 66% that if you wanted to, you could NO .28% have a say about the way the City DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 6% of Eden Prairie runs things? Let's talk about local city government for a moment. When people think about local government, they think of the elected officials who represent them... . 38. Offhand, do you recall the name GARY PETERSON . .48% of the Mayor of Eden Prairie? OTHER NAMED 2% (IF "YES," ASK:) What is his DON'T KNOW 50% name? OTHER: Do you recall the names of any current members of the Eden Prairie City Council? (IF "YES," ASK:) Which council members do you recall? 4 1 NAMED NOT NAMED 39. Dick Anderson 12% 88% 40. Doug Tenpas 19% 81% 41. Jean L. Harris 11% 89% 42. Patricia Pidcock 22% 78% 43. Other 3% 97% 44. How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL 2% about the work of the Mayor and FAIR AMOUNT 28% City Council -- a great deal, a VERY LITTLE 69% fair amount, or very little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% 45. From what you know, do you ap- STRONGLY APPROVE 9% prove or disapprove of the job SOMEWHAT APPROVE 55% the Mayor and City Council are SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE....8% doing? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) STRONGLY DISAPPROVE....5% And do you feel strongly that DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24% way? IF OPINION STATED IN QUESTION #45, ASK: 46. Why do you feel that way? DON'T KNOW, 6%; NO PROBLEMS, 18%; GOOD JOB, 21%; HEAR- SAY, 3%; ISSUES, 10%; GOOD CITY, 3%; LANDFILL, 5%; COULD IMPROVE, 7%; DON'T LISTEN, 3%. 47. How much first-hand contact have QUITE A LOT 5% you had with the Eden Prairie SOME 17% City Staff -- quite a lot, some, VERY LITTLE 39% very little, or none at all? NONE AT ALL ` 37% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% 48. From what you have seen or heard, EXCELLENT 6% how would you rate the job per- GOOD 50% formance of the Eden Prairie City ONLY FAIR 9% Staff -- excellent, good, only POOR 3% fair, or poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. . .32% IF RATING GIVEN IN QUESTION #48, ASK: 49. Why did you rate city staff as • DON'T KNOW, 5%; GOOD JOB, 21%; LISTEN, 4%; HELPFUL, 13%; RUDE, 2%; NO PROBLEMS, 12%; COULD IMPROVE, 10%. Let's talk about public safety in Eden Prairie. ... 50. Do you feel that crimes against INCREASED 51% property in Eden Prairie have DECREASED 3% increased, decreased, or re- ABOUT THE SAME 31% mained about the same during DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 15% the past five years? 5 51. How about crimes against people, INCREASED 37% have they increased, decreased, DECREASED 4% or remained about the same during ABOUT THE SAME 41% the past five years? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 18% 52. During the past year, have you YES 49% been involved in or observed a NO 51% situation in which a member of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% the Eden Prairie Police Department was present? IF "YES," ASK: 53. Would you say the way the EXCELLENT 27% police handled the situation GOOD 18% was excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR 3% fair, or poor? POOR 1% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 09. 54. Would you say the time PROMPT 43% it took the police to re- NOT PROMPT 29- spond was prompt, or not? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 4% I would like to read you a short list of prevention services provided by the Eden Prairie Police and Fire Departments. For each one, please tell me if you or members of this household have in the past or are currently using the service. AWARE DON'T UNAWARE USED NOT KNOW 55. Medical Emergency Services? 12% 14% 74% 0% 56. Neighborhood Watch? 12% 19% 69% 0% 57. Operation ID? 20% 17% 63% 0% 58. Home Safety Analysis? 48% 7% 44% 0% I would like to read you a short list of public safety concerns. 59. Please tell me which one you consider to be your greatest concern in Eden Prairie. If you feel that none of these issues are serious in the city, just say so. (READ LIST) 60. Which do you consider to be the second major concern in the city? Again, if you feel that none of the remaining issues are serious in the city, just say so. (DELETE FIRST CHOICE AND RE-READ LIST) 6 t s FIRST SECOND t Personal safety from violent crime 20% 16% Burglary 16% 22% Traffic and pedestrian safety 21% 13% Drugs 23% 21% Juvenile crimes and vandalism 13% 18% Other 3% 1% None are serious 3% 4% I Don't Know/Refused 2% 5% 61. How would you rate the amount of TOO MUCH 2% patrolling the police department ABOUT RIGHT 74% 4 does in your neighborhood -- NOT ENOUGH 19% would you say they do too much, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. ...5% 1 about right, or not enough? 1 i 62. Would you support or oppose the SUPPORT 69% Police being more rigorous in OPPOSE 25% 1 their issuing of tickets to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. ...7% drivers found speeding on city a streets? I would like to read you a short list of problems which may impact suburban communities. For each one, please tell me if you j think it is a major problem, a minor problem, or not a problem at all in Eden Prairie. MAJOR MINOR NOT DK-R 63. Spousal and/or child abuse? 15% 50% 16% 20% r 64. Gangs of juvenile delin- quents? 7% 43% 36% 14% 65. Crack houses? 6% 33% 36% 24% 66. Satanic cults? 3% 27% 42% 28% 67. Alcohol and chemical abuse? 32% 53% 11% 5% 68. Teen pregnancy? 17% 47% 12% 24% 69. Juvenile suicide? 12% 42% 17% 29% is The next short series of questions deal with the enforcement of city codes and ordinances. For each of the type of code I will read, please tell me if you think that the City is enforcing the codes at about the right level, is too exacting, or is not rigorous enough. RIGHT TOO NOT D.K. LEVEL EXACT RIGOR REF. 70. Animal Control? 76% 6% 13% 6% 7 i RIGHT TOO NOT D.K. LEVEL EXACT RIGOR REF. 71. Discarded trash and debris? 70% 1% 27% 3% 72. Messy yards? 72% 2% 23% 4% 73. Weed control in residential areas? 70% 3% 24% 4% 74. Parking in residential areas? 83% 2% 12% 3% 75. During the past twelve months, YES 46% have you contacted anyone working NO 53% for the City of Eden Prairie, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....1% other than the police or fire departments, whether to obtain in- formation, to get service, or make a complaint of any kind? IF "YES," ASK: 76. What was the nature of your most recent inquiry; that is, what information or service did you need? TAXES, 7%; ANIMALS, 4%; PARK INFORMATION, 5%; PERMITS, 6%; ASSESSMENT, 2%; GENERAL INFORMATION, 8%; PROBLEM, 11%; RECYCLING, 1%; SCATTERED, 4%. 77. What department or official did you contact first about this inquiry? • DON'T KNOW, 5%; CITY HALL, 14%; PARK-REC, 4%; LICENSE, 1%; BUILDING, 4%; ASSESSING, 3%; ANIMAL CONTROL, 2%; PUBLIC WORKS, 5%; MAYOR-COUNCIL, 2%; ENGINEERING, 2%; POLICE, 2%; PLANNING, 2%; FAMILY CENTER, 2%. 78. In general, were you satis- SATISFIED 36% Pied or dissatisfied with the DISSATISFIED 10% way your inquiry was handled? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....0% IF "DISSATISFIED," ASK: 79. Why were you dissatisfied? NOT HELPFUL, 5%; RUDE, 2%; RUN-AROUND, 3%. Let's talk about development for a few minutes.... On a scale of one to ten, where ten is "excellent" and one is "poor," how would you rate Eden Prairie as a place.... 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DK 80. To find housing which fits the budgets and lifestyles of most people. 1 1 9 11 22 17 16 13 3 5 1 81. To find full-time employ- ment opportunities for the head of a household. 1 5 7 10 27 15 10 8 3 3 11 82. To start a business. 2 2 6 6 16 12 14 13 5 4 23 83. To find a wide variety of entertainment and dining opportunities for people and families of all ages. 2 8 22 20 17 12 9 7 2 2 0 84. To raise children. 0 0 0 0 3 4 12 36 20 19 5 85. To spend one's retirement years. 6 4 4 7 13 6 11 20 8 8 15 86. To find a wide variety of retail goods and services. 1 1 3 5 19 23 21 17 6 6 0 87. Has the development across the YES 85% City blended with the natural NO 13% amenities and, tone of the com- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% munity? 88. Does the development across the WELL-PLANNED 76% city seem to have been well-. NOT WELL PLANNED 21% planned for the future of Eden DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ` 2% Prairie? 89. Do you feel that Eden Prairie ADEQUATE 59% residents have an adequate oppor- INADEQUATE 27% tunity for participation in the DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 14% zoning and land use decision- making process? 90. In general, from what you have APPROVE 67% heard or seen, do you approve or DISAPPROVE 23% disapprove of the zoning and land DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 11% use decisions made by the City? 91. If more development were proposed SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 60% in the City of Eden Prairie, which MULTIPLE FAMILY UNITS..7% of the following would you most COMMERCIAL OR OFFICE 10% prefer? (READ CHOICES #1-#4) RETAIL 9% NONE OF THE ABOVE 7% OTHER (VOL.) 4% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 4% 9 92. Do you think that the pace of ABOUT RIGHT 47$ development in the city has been TOO RAPID 48% about right, too rapid, or not NOT FAST ENOUGH 4% fast enough? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2% 93. In future development, do you feel TOP PRIORITY 52% that blending with the natural MAJOR PRIORITY .42$ amenities of the community, such MINOR PRIORITY 4% as hills, trees, creeks, and IRRELEVANT 2% marshlands, should be the top DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% priority, a major priority, a minor priority, or irrelevant? 94. Which of the following two state- STATEMENT A 19% ments comes closest to your STATEMENT B 43% feelings? BOTH (VOL.) 13% A. The City has been too hard NEITHER (VOL.) . 13% on developers and missed some DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 12% great opportunities that have gone elsewhere. B. The City is too easy on developers and permitted fast growth and environmental prob- lems to occur. Currently, the courts are reviewing the ability of cities to limit certain types of construction. If the courts were to rule that cities had the power.... 95. Would you support or oppose a STRONGLY SUPPORT 21% moratorium on the building of SUPPORT 33% further apartment and condo- OPPOSE 131% minium buildings in Eden STRONGLY OPPOSE 10% Prairie? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....6% Do you feel strongly that way? IF "STRONGLY SUPPORT" OR "SUPPORT," ASK: 96. Would you still favor the YES moratorium if it meant higher NO 30%19% property taxes in the future? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. ...5% 97. Would you support or oppose a mor- STRONGLY SUPPORT 12% atorium on the construction of SUPPORT 31% more shopping centers or "strip OPPOSE 38%malls" in Eden Prairie? STRONGLY OPPOSE 13% (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. ...6% strongly that way? IF "STRONGLY SUPPORT" OR "SUPPORT," ASK: 98. Would you still favor the YES moratorium if it meant higher NO 22%18% property taxes in the future? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....4% 10 99. Would you support or oppose a mor- STRONGLY SUPPORT 11% atorium on the construction of SUPPORT 24% more office and light industrial OPPOSE 41% complexes in Eden Prairie? STRONGLY OPPOSE 15% (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....8% strongly that way? IF "STRONGLY SUPPORT" OR "SUPPORT," ASK: 100. Would you still favor the YES 18% moratorium if it meant higher NO 13% property taxes in the future? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....4% There has been a lot of discussion about the need for a Downtown Area in Eden Prairie. The City Mission statement envisions a "special downtown center that will provide an active, bustling, central gathering point that is pedestrian friendly, accessible to the entire community, and lend a small-town feeling and opportunity for tradition." 101. From what you have heard or seen, STRONGLY SUPPORT 16% do you support or oppose the SUPPORT 38% development of a Downtown Center? OPPOSE 25% (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And do you STRONGLY OPPOSE 14% feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....7% 102. What do you like and/or dislike most about the idea of a Downtown Eden Prairie? NO ANSWER, 8%; SENSE OF COMMUNITY, 22%; NOT NEEDED, 26%; NEED INFORMATION, 2%; NEED CENTRAL PLACE, 14%; TOO MUCH RETAIL, 7%; ATTRACT RETAIL, 6%; DUMB IDEA, 9%; LOCATION! 5%; COST, 2%. Some residents have told us about areas in the community that they feel should not be developed and should be maintained for scenic and recreational uses. Others have felt that development would be acceptable there. For each of the following locations, please tell me if you would strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose development there. STR SMT SMT STR D.K SUP SUP OPP OPP REF. 103. The Riley Creek Valley? 3% 12% 19% 25% 41% 104. Heavily wooded areas in the Southwest of the city? 4% 18% 31% 39% 9% 105. The bluffs along the Minnesota River? 6% 15% 28% 45% 6% Currently, Eden Prairie requires developers to provide additional amenities, such as tree preservation, construction of trail 11 corridors, and parkland dedication or payment of park fees. People in favor of these requirements feel that developers should give something back to the city directly, even if it might discourage new construction. People opposed to these requirements feel that they discourage new construction and force developers to go to other communities. 106. Do you support the City continuing YES 93% these types of requirements? NO 55. DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. ...2% Some communities across the country have required developers to also provide extra facilities, such as affordable housing opportunities, daycare facilities, and other types of services for the community, in addition to their construction. Again, proponents feel that developers should give something back to the City directly, while opponents feel it discourages new construction and drives developers elsewhere. Would you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose requiring developers to pay.... StF SmF SmO StO DKR 107. Fees for services, such as subsidized day care for residents? 9% 23% 39% 21% 8% 108. Fees to underwrite the costs of affordable housing in the City? 7% 30% 33% 20% 9% 109. Do you think that Eden Prairie YES +62% currently has an adequate range NO 34% of housing choices to offer its DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....4% residents? IF "NO," ASK: 110. What types of housing do you feel the City should encourage in order to expand the range? LOWER INCOME, 11%; MIDDLE INCOME, 19%; PREFER THAT WAY, 3%. 111. Do you feel that the City has YES 34% adequate housing opportunities NO 35% for senior citizens? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 31% Some communities are exploring the development of transitional care for senior citizens. While seniors would occupy their own self-contained rental units with private kitchen and dining facilities, medical care and congregate dining would be available within the building. 12 112. Would you favor or oppose the STRONGLY FAVOR 28% City making an aggressive effort FAVOR 40% to attract additional transitional OPPOSE 13% care development to Eden Prairie? STRONGLY OPPOSE 4% (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...15% strongly that way? IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR," ASK: 113. Would you favor the use of FAVOR 46% financial incentives to OPPOSE 14% attract transitional care DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ..8% developments? Turning to parks and recreational opportunities.... 114. In general, do you usually spend OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES....57% your leisure time in outdoor INDOOR ACTIVITIES 11% activities, weather permitting, BOTH (VOL.) 31% or indoor activities? NO FREE TIME (VOL.) . ...2% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% 115. In general, how well informed are VERY WELL INFORMED....21% you about the Eden Prairie park SOMEWHAT INFORMED 62% system and facilities. Would you NOT TOO WELL INFORMED 13% say you are very well informed, NOT AT ALL INFORMED....3% somewhat informed, not too well DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% informed, or not at all informed? 116. How would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT 46% reational facilities in Eden GOOD 45% Prairie -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR s..3% fair, or poor? POOR 6% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% IF RATING IS GIVEN, ASK: 117. Why do you feel that way? NO ANSWER, 8%; WELL MAINTAINED, 39%; SUFFICIENT & CON- VENIENT, 11%; WELL USED, 11%; GOOD PLANNING, 13%; ENJOY THEM, 16%; COULD IMPROVE, 4%; SCATTERED, 3%. The Eden Prairie Park System is composed of smaller neighborhood parks designed to serve residents within a one-half mile radius, and larger community parks containing ballfields, picnic areas, beaches, and other offerings. Other community facilities include the Community Center with an ice arena and swimming pool, and Flying Cloud ballfields and trails. Of these facilities, which do members of your household use? USE DON'T D.K./REF. 118. Smaller neighborhood parks? 70% 30% 0% 13 USE DON'T D.K./REF. 119. Larger community parks? 71% 29% 0% 120. The community center? 47% 53% 0% 121. Flying Cloud ballfields? 27% 73% 0% 122. Trails? 75% 25% 0% Now, from what you have seen or heard, how would you rate the quality of each component in the park system -- would you rate them as excellent, good, only fair, or poor? EXC GOOD FAIR POOR D.K. 123. Smaller neighborhood parks? 39% 43% 3% 1% 14% 124. Larger community parks? 42% 37% 3% 0% 19% 125. The community center? 19% 41% 4% 1% 35% 126. Flying Cloud ballfields? 13% 34% 4% 1% 48% 127. City trails? 37% 45% 3% 1% 14% 128. Do you feel that the current mix YES 92% of recreational opportunities NO 8% sufficiently meets the needs of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% members of your household? IF "NO," ASK: 129. What additional recreational opportunities would you like to see the City of Eden Prairie offer residents? TEEN CENTER, 1%; MORE PARKS, 2%; GOLF COURSE, 1%; COMMUNITY CENTER, 2%; TRAILS, 1%; PRE-SCHOOL FACIL- ITIES, 5%; SCATTERED, 2%. 130. In the past year, have you or any YES 36% members of this household partici- NO 63% pated in city-sponsored recrea- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% tional programs? IF "YES" IN QUESTION #130, ASK: 131. Which ones? EVENTS, 7%; SWIMMING, 4%; KIDS ACTIVITIES, 2%; SOFT- BALL, 4%; SOCCER, 2%; BASEBALL, 2%; VOLLEYBALL, 3%; THREE OR MORE, 5%; SKATING, 1%; DANCE/EXERCISE, 2%; TENNIS, 1%; FOOTBALL, 1%; SCATTERED, 3%. 14 132. Were you generally satis- SATISFIED 34% fied or dissatisfied with DISSATISFIED 2% the program(s)? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% The City has two types of trails. One routes the trail through as much of the natural environment of the City as possible, avoiding streets and roads, and following creek valleys, parks, lakeshores, and so forth. To complete this type of trail system, the City may need to acquire easements across certain privately held parcels of land. The second type of trail follows a more linear pattern alongside existing streets. 133. Which of these two types of trails OFF-STREET/STRONG 32% do you more prefer -- an off- OFF-STREET 35% street pattern or a linear NO DIFFERENCE (VOL.) 12% pattern? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do LINEAR 12% you feel strongly that way? LINEAR/STRONG 7% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% The City has acquired ownership of a significant amount of land along lakeshores and within creek valleys for conservation and preservation purposes. 134. Do you support or oppose the STRONGLY SUPPORT 26% development of a trail system SUPPORT 55% within the creek valleys? (WAIT OPPOSE 9% FOR RESPONSE). Do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE 4% strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 7% As I mentioned, to complete a citywide trail system, the City may need to acquire easements across certain parcels of privatel - held land. If an owner refuses to grant the easement, the City has two choices: either use the power of condemnation to acquire the easement at fair market value or revise its trail plans. 135. If the completion of the trail STRONGLY FAVOR 7% system requires easements across FAVOR 31% certain parcels of privately-held OPPOSE 34% land, would you favor or oppose STRONGLY OPPOSE 22% the City using condemnation to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 6% acquire them? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel strongly that way? 136. Should any off-road trail system PEDESTRIANS 12% be primarily constructed for BOTH 79% pedestrians or for both pedest- NEITHER (VOL.) 4% rians and bicyclists? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 4% 137. Would you favor or oppose the STRONGLY FAVOR 26% City developing a municipal FAVOR 31% golf course? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) OPPOSE 19% And do you feel strongly that STRONGLY OPPOSE 14% way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 10% IF "OPPOSE OR STRONGLY OPPOSE," ASK: 15 138. Would you still oppose the YES 18% project if the golf course NO 12% could be built and operated DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% without any property tax increase? The Metropolitan Airports Commission is considering the acquisi- tion of additional land around Flying Cloud Airport in order to reduce any possible conflicts between the airport and adjacent land users. There has been some discussion about the possibility of developing a golf course on airport property. 139. Would you favor or oppose a City- STRONGLY FAVOR 26% developed golf course on airport FAVOR 38% property, if it could be con- OPPOSE 17% structed without any property tax STRONGLY OPPOSE. 9% increase? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....11% you feel strongly that way? Miller Park is a 100 acre undeveloped park on the south shore of Mitchell Lake. The park is presently slated for development to provide youth baseball and softball fields, youth soccer and football fields, and other facilities such as picnic areas, tennis courts, and hockey and skating rinks. As you may recall, the proposal for this development was included on two narrowly defeated bond referendums, which also provided for other recreational improvements, such as an expansion of the community center and acquisition of park land. Suppose that the City proposed a bond referendum for the sole purpose of developing Miller Park. • 140. Would you support or oppose this STRONGLY SUPPORT 17% single purpose bond referendum? SUPPORT. . 36% (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And do you OPPOSE 23% feel strongly that way? STRONGLY OPPOSE 12% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 12% 141. Would you favor or oppose the City STRONGLY FAVOR 19% constructing and operating an out- FAVOR 35% door swimming pool? (WAIT FOR OPPOSE 28% RESPONSE) And do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE 12% that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 69- There has been extensive discussion regarding the expansion of the Community Center. Two major proposals have been discussed. For each, please tell me whether you would strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose it. STS SMS SMO STO DKR 142. A second ice sheet for skating and hockey? 10% 38% 29% 12% 12% 143. A gymnasium? 17% 39% 23% 10% 10% 16 1. 4 The City is also considering revisions to the entry to the 1 Community Center in order to provide limited temporary parking for parents waiting for children, improved vehicular access, a 1 more direct pedestrian access from the parking lot, and land- scaping changes around the entrance to improve the Center's appearance. 144. Would you favor or oppose these FAVOR 71% i revisions? OPPOSE 20% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 9% IF "OPPOSED," ASK: 145. Would you still be opposed YES 9% if the revisions could be NO 9% i. accomplished with no proper- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2% ty tax increases? , 4 I would like to read you a brief list of recreational facilities that are part of the Eden Prairie Park System. For each, based upon what you have seen or heard, please tell me if you feel the i current offerings are sufficient to meet demands or if you feel i that additional offerings of that type are needed. SUFF ADDL DK-R 146. Youth softball fields? 60% 21% 20% 147. Adult softball fields? 64% 15% 21% 148. Youth soccer fields? 57% 10% 34% • 149. Football fields? 55% 11% 34% 150. Outdoor swimming pool? 41% 43% 16% i 151. Expanded Senior Center? 24% 44% . 32% 152. Tennis courts? 62% 21% 18% i 153. Outdoor hockey rinks? 61% 20% 19% ! 154. Outdoor skating rinks? 56% 26% 18% 1 i 155. Activities for teens? 22% 53% 25% 156. Outdoor basketball courts? 53% 25% 22% 157. Picnic areas? 63% 33% 5% i. 158. Trails? 57% 37% 6% 159. Playground equipment, such as t slides and swings? 56% 33% 11% 17 1 1 Changing topics.... As you may know, refuse haulers in Eden Prairie also pick-up recyclable materials. Households are asked to separate recyclables from the rest of their trash and haulers carry them away. 160. Do you now participate in the YES 71% curbside pick-up program? NO 29% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% IF "YES," ASK: 161. How often do you put recy- WEEKLY 51%0• clables out for collection TWICE MONTHLY 14% -- weekly, twice monthly, ONCE MONTHLY 6% monthly, quarterly, or less? QUARTERLY 0% LESS 0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% 162. Are you satisfied or dis- SATISFIED 58% satisfied with the recycling DISSATISFIED 11% program? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% IF "DISSATISFIED," ASK: 163. Why do you feel that way? DON'T TAKE PLASTIC, 5%; DON'T TAKE OTHERS, 4%; COST, 1%; SCATTERED, 2%. • IF "NO," ASK: 164. Which of the following best STATEMENT A 4% describes your reasons for STATEMENT B 2% not participating: STATEMENT C 2% A. I wasn't aware of the STATEMENT D 3% new program. STATEMENT E 2% B. I knew about it, but need ALL OF THE ABOVE (VOL) .0% more information. OTHER REASON 11% C. The program is too incon- NONE OF ABOVE (VOL) ....6% inconvenient. DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% D. I am just not interested. E. It isn't worth it to take OTHER: LIVING IN APART- the time. MENT. 165. How do you currently dispose of COMPOST ON PROPERTY 46% grass clippings and yard waste USE LOCAL COMP SITE....4% -- do you compost on your prop- DISPOSE IN GARBAGE 11% erty, use a yard waste compost OTHER METHOD (VOL.) 19% site, or dispose of it with DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....20% your garbage? 18 166. Are the locations of yard waste CONVENIENT 14% compost sites convenient or not, NOT CONVENIENT 5% or don't you have any information NO INFORMATION 57% about them? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 24% 167. Are you aware that Goodwill YES/USED 53% Industries will collect discarded YES/HAVE NOT USED 26% household items, such as clothes NOT AWARE 20% appliances, newsprint, glass, cans DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% and plastic? (IF "YES," ASK:) Have you ever used their services? As you also may know, several refuse haulers serve Eden Prairie. This arrangement has permitted citizens to choose their own haulers and contract directly with them. It has also created significant overlap between the haulers and increased noise and congestion on city streets. 168. Of the following three proposals, PROPOSAL A 50% which do you most favor: PROPOSAL B 23% A. The present system. PROPOSAL C 15% B. The City assigns current ALL EQUALLY 1% haulers to exclusively handle DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....11% specific areas; C. The City designates one hauler to serve the entire city; The disposal of household hazardous wastes, such as motor oil, batteries, and used or old paints and pesticides has been the subject of much discussion lately. 169. How do you generally dispose of these type of households wastes? NO ANSWER, 9%; HAVE NONE, 32%; GARBAGE, 12%; GAS STATION, 17%; NEED INFORMATION WHERE, 1%; DROP-OFF, 18%; RECYCLE, 6%; STORE THEM, 4%; HAZARDOUS WASTE DAYS, 3%. 170. Are you aware of the Hennepin AWARE 33% County Household Hazardous Waste UNAWARE 67% Collection Days? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% 171. Are you aware of the presence of YES/FAMILIAR 87% the Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill YES/NOT FAMILIAR 7% in Eden Prairie? (IF "YES," ASK:) NOT AWARE 5% Are you familiar with the proposed DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2% plans to expand the landfill? 172. From what you have heard or seen, could you tell me who owns the Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill? DON'T KNOW, 29%; BFI, 70%; INCORRECT ANSWER, 2%. 19 173. From what you have seen or heard, STRONGLY SUPPORT 7% do you support or oppose the pro- SUPPORT 14% posed expansion of the landfill? OPPOSE 25% (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE 41% strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 14% 174. Who do you believe is responsible for issuing the permit for expansion of the landfill? NO ANSWER, 24%; NO ONE, 2%; CITY COUNCIL, 9%; CITY, 33%; STATE, 8%; COUNTY, 8%; PCA, 12%; METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, 4%; SCATTERED, 2%. The City has spent about one million dollars in law suits, testing, and staff time to both fight and influence the landfill expansion decision-making process. To continue the opposition to the landfill expansion, another one million dollars may have to be spent by the City. • 175. Do you favor or oppose the contin- STRONGLY FAVOR 36% uation of City efforts to block FAVOR 24% the expansion, in light of these OPPOSE 14% potential costs? (WAIT FOR RE- STRONGLY OPPOSE 11% SPONSE) Do you feel strongly that DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 15% way? 176. Do you feel that the City should YES 40% seek a compromise solution? NO 42% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 18% IF "YES," ASK: 177. What guarantees or limits do you feel it is critical that the City should attempt to gain as part of a compromise solution? NO ANSWER, 17%; NONE, 1%; ASSURE SAFETY, 7%; MORE REGULATIONS, 6%; LIMIT SIZE, 8%; SCATTERED, 1%. Changing topics again.... 178. Have you heard of the organize- YES 49% tion, PROP -- People Reaching NO 51% Out to People? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0 For your information, PROP provides guidance to residents seeking aid or help in solving a problem. It provides referrals to the agencies that can best help an individual or family. 20 4 179. In general, do you feel that STATE AND FEDERAL 26% human and social services COUNTY should be PRINCIPALLY provided CITY GOVERNMENTS 9% by state and federal programs, CHURCHES/FOUNDATIONS..11% county programs and services, VOLUNTEER 17% city governments, churches OTHER (VOL.) 19% and foundations, or volunteer DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 6% organizations? Let's talk about traffic in Eden Prairie.. . . 180. During the past few years, do you MUCH HEAVIER 67% feel the traffic on main arteries SOMEWHAT HEAVIER 25% in Eden Prairie has become much CHANGED LITTLE 4% heavier, somewhat heavier, changed LIGHTER little, or become lighter? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 4% 181. How about on residential streets MUCH HEAVIER 36% in your area? SOMEWHAT HEAVIER 36% CHANGED LITTLE 22% SOMEWHAT LIGHTER 2% MUCH LIGHTER 0% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 4% 182. Does your residential street YES 32% current show signs of marked NO 66% 1 deterioration? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2% 183. How important do you feel it is VERY IMPORTANT 57% for the City of Eden Prairie to SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 40% take actions to relieve traffic NOT AT ALL IMPORTANTt..2% congestion on city streets and DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% roads -- very important, some- what important, or not at all important? 184. Have you or any members of your YES 14% household used public transport- NO 86% ation, other than the airlines, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% in the past three months? IF "YES," ASK: 185. Was the Southwest Metro YES 8% Transit used? NO 6% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% IF "YES," ASK: 186. Which service was used EXPRESS BUS 6% -- the express bus to or DIAL-A-RIDE 1% from downtown, Dial-A- BOTH 1% Ride, or both? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% 21 i 187. Was the service used to WORK 5% to travel to work, SCHOOL 1% school, for social or SOCIAL/RECREATIONAL 1% recreational purposes, SHOPPING/APPOINT 0% for shopping or an COMBINATION 2% appointment, or some NONE OF THE ABOVE 0% combination? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% I am going to read you a list of reasons why people might choose NOT to use public transportation for their travel needs. Which, if any of these reasons, apply to you? YES NO DKR 188. I really don't know enough about the 37% 60% 3% system to use it. 189. When I travel I need my automobile at my destination or along the way. 63% 34% 3% 190. Existing routes don't go to my j 56% 30% 14% destination. 191. The times at which buses run are not 52% 32% 16% convenient for my schedule. 192. I need to transport a family member or friend to a destination. 34% 60% 7% If for any reason you had to use public transportation to reach a destination.. . . 193. Which of the following forms of transportation would be your first preference? (READ LIST BELOW) 194. Which would be your least preferred form of transportation? FIRST LEAST A full-sized public bus 25% 27% A public mini-van or bus 15% 18% A carpool .22% 25% A light rail transit vehicle 22% 14% All equally 7% 5% None of the above 6% 5% Don't Know/Refused 3% 7% Suppose the federal or state government raised the gasoline tax by the following amounts per gallon. For each tax increase, please tell me whether it would definitely make you change your means of travel and commuting, or would make you consider changing your behavior, or would have no impact at all. 22 ; DEF CON NOI DKR 195. A 25 cent increase per gallon? 10% 19% 67% 4% 196. A 50 cent increase per gallon? 21% 24% 49% 6% 197. A 75 cent increase per gallon? 39% 23% 32% 6% 198. A one dollar increase per gallon? 50% 15% 30% 6% 199. Do you support or oppose the SUPPORT 65% plans by Hennepin County to pro- OPPOSE 23% vide light rail transit to this DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 130• area? 200. If the need arose to use public transportation by you or a member of your household, are there any changes or improve- ments that could be made to facilitate your use of it? NO ANSWER, 17%; NONE, 39%; MORE FREQUENT, 12%; MORE ROUTES, 23%; MORE INFORMATION, 4%; RIDE-SHARE, 2%; EXPRESS BUSES, 3%. There has been discussion for several years about the need for a permanent city-owned site for the City Hall. Currently, the City rents space in an office-warehouse complex and space limitations at this new location are again becoming a problem. 201. Would you support or oppose the STRONGLY FAVOR 16% City of Eden Prairie building a FAVOR 42% new City Hall? (WAIT FOR RE- OPPOSE 22% SPONSE) Do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE v.12% that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8% 202. Does the fact that the City pays YES 22% $250,000 in rent annually for this NO 71% space change your opinion? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. 8% The construction of a new City Hall facility might require the passage of a bond referendum. Citizens would be asked to approve a five million dollar bond issue. To cover the issuance of the bonds, the average $125,000 home in Eden Prairie would have a property tax increase of about $10.00 per year for twenty years. 203. Would you support or oppose this STRONGLY FAVOR 19% bond referendum for the construc- FAVOR 40% tion of a new City Hall? (WAIT OPPOSE 15% FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE 17% strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 9% IF A POSITION IS GIVEN IN QUESTION #203, ASK: 23 204. Why do you feel that way? NO ANSWER, 6%; NO NEED, 13%; PRICE RIGHT, 21%; TAXES TOO HIGH, 11%; NEEDED, 22%; SILLY TO RENT, 7%; TOO EXPENSIVE, 7%; NEED MORE INFORMATION, 3%; GOOD FOR CITY, 2%. t E 205. Would you prefer to see the City CONSTRUCT 15% construct a new facility, acquire ACQUIRE. . 44% and retrofit an existing building, DON'T CARE 32% . or don't you care? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 9 i 206. Is there any general area in Eden Prairie where you think 1 the City Hall should be sited? (IF "YES," ASK:) Where? NO ANSWER, 19%; NONE, 33%; DOWNTOWN AREA, 10%; CENTRALLY I LOCATED, 20%; BY CENTER, 6%; CURRENT LOCATION, 5%; OUTLET f MALL, 2%; NEAR POLICE, 4%; SCATTERED, 3%. 1 Let's talk about the general priorities that Eden Prairie should establish for the future. Because the City budget is not large enough to do everything, choices must be made in allocating funds. In each of the following policy areas, do you feel that Eden Prairie should commit enough tax money to provide better programs and facilities than neighboring communities, as good as neighboring communities, or programs and facilities that are not 4 as good as neighboring communities. AS NOT AS D.K./ BET GOOD GOOD REF. 1 207. Parks and recreation? 26% 69% 2% 3% r 208. Human and social services? 21% 63% 6% 10% 209. Public safety? 36% 61% 1% 3% • 210. Planning and development? 29% 66% 3% 3% 1 211. Public works infra- structure, such as city streets and utilities? 18% 76% 4% 3% 1 1 Moving on... . i Many suburban municipalities own and operate liquor stores. 212. Do you think that the sale of YES 51% liquors is an appropriate city NO 43% function? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 6% Currently the City of Eden Prairie operates two municipal liquor stores. In recent years, the stores have registered $125,000 t yearly profits. The City Council is now studying the future of i the operation. 1 1 24 i i 213. Do you feel that the City should SELL 34% sell its liquor facilities to FURTHER IMPROVEMENTS 43% private owners OR that the City KEEP/NO IMPROVE (VOL)..9% should make further improvements DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 14% in these operations to enhance { profitability? IF "SELL," ASK: 214. Would you still support YES 21% selling the facilities if NO 11% # the lost revenue would DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% require additional tax i revenue or service cuts to compensate? 1 d 215. What is your primary source of information about community events going on in Eden Prairie? { DON'T KNOW-NONE, 2%; EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS, 40%; SAILOR, 6%; FLYERS, 4%; NEWSPAPERS, 25%; NEWS & SAILOR, 13%; NEWSLETTER, i 4%; WORD OF MOUTH, 2%; SCHOOLS, 2%; SCATTERED, 2%. 216. What is your primary source of information about City i government and its activities? DON'T KNOW-NONE, 5%; EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS, 42%; SAILOR, 7%; FLYERS, 2%; NEWSPAPERS, 25%; NEWS & SAILOR, 7%; NEWSLh'rr.R, 2%; WORD OF MOUTH, 4%; SCATTERED, 3%. i 217. Should the City publish a news- YES 52% letter on a regular basis and NO 147% ) sent to each home, which high- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% lights its activities, actions, and programs? . 218. How likely would you be to read VERY LIKELY 49% a city newsletter -- very likely, SOMEWHAT LIKELY 24% 4 somewhat likely, not too likely, NOT TOO LIKELY 9% or not at all likely? NOT AT ALL LIKELY 17% • DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1% } 219. Does your household receive YES 66% cable television? NO 34% REFUSED 0% i IF "YES," ASK: j. 220. How likely would you be to VERY LIKELY 8% watch City Council Meetings SOMEWHAT LIKELY 24% if they were telecasted -- NOT TOO LIKELY 16% very likely, somewhat likely, NOT AT ALL LIKELY 17% not too likely, or not at all DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% i likely? t Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes.... 1 a 25 I f S • Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following age groups live in your household. Let's start with the oldest. Be sure to include yourself. 221. First, persons 65 or over? 0, 91%; 1, 6%; 2, 3%. 222. Adults under 65? 0, 6%; 1, 14%; 2, 70%; 3, 7%; 4+, 4%. 223. School-aged children? (Grades 0, 63%; 1, 19%; 2, 14%; K - 12) 3+, 4%. 224. Pre-schoolers? 0, 76%; 1, 14%; 2, 9%. 225. Do you own or rent your present OWN 73% residence? RENT 27% 226. What is your age, please? 18-24 5% (READ CATEGORIES, IF NEEDED) 25-34 33% 35-44 33% 45-54 16% 55-64 6% 65 AND OVER 7% 227. What is the your occupation and the occupation of your spouse, if applicable? [HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD TABULATED:) PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL, 30%; OWNER-MANAGER, 42%; CLERICAL- SALES, 8%; BLUE COLLAR, 9%; RETIRED, 7%; SCATTERED, 4%. 228. What is the last grade of school LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL 2% you completed? HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE..12% VO-TECH SCHOOL 7% SOME COLLEGE 25% COLLEGE GRADUATE • 42% POST-GRADUATE 12% And now, for one final question 229. Could you tell me your approximate UNDER $12,500 3% pre-tax yearly household income. $12,500-$25,000 9% Does the income lie.... $25,001-$37,500 14% $37,501-$50,000 18% $50,001-$62,500 17% $62,501-$75,000 11% OVER $75,000 21% DON'T KNOW 0% REFUSED 7% 230. Gender (DO NOT ASK) MALE 48% FEMALE 52% Thank you very much for your time. ZONE 1 (PCTS 1A,1B,2,3,4,7) 38% ZONE 2 (PCTS 5A,5B,6,PART 7A&7B) 28% ZONE 3 (PCTS PART 7A&7B,8,9A,9B) 35% 26 MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: May 18, 1990 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Update Attached is a 1990-2000 Capital Improvement Program projection. As you know, this CIP is updated on an annual basis based on decisions the City Council makes regarding general fund commitments toward park projects and petitions from neighborhoods, as well the amount of actual cash parks fees that are generated each year. In regards to your specific questions, this plan calls for the following: • 1. Boyce property repayment to the Utility Fund - $475,000 will have to be borrowed from the Utility Fund in 1990 and is proposed to be paid back in the following amounts - $200,000 in 1991, $200,000 in 1992, $150,000 in 1993 and $100,000 in 1994. Exact amounts should be determined by John Frane, but i should hopefully fit within those general perimeters. Two- hundred thousand dollars should be taken from the cash park fee fund this year. 2. Miller Park Referendum - This CIP calls for a 3.5 minion dollar referendum in either 1991 or 1992. Initial expenditure in this CIP calls for $300,000 to be spent in 1992, basically on plans and specifications for the entire site including grading, roads, utilities, and structures. Construction to begin in 1993 and completed in 1996. This plan also calls for a 1.5 million dollar referendum in 1998 for construction of an outdoor swimming pool in Miller Park. 3. parkland Acquisition Fund - The revenue projections call for a general fund budget of $175,000 in 1991, $200,000 in 1992, $225,000 in 1993, $200,000 in 1994, and $200,000 in 1995. If you look at the bottom line of the expenditure side of the CIP that is referred to as "Total minus T.I.F. and Referendum", you will note the amount of expenditure each year minus the referendum for Miller Park and the T.I.F. for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. Staff would expect approximately $300,000 a year in cash park fees, so you are able to project approximately how much additional revenue from the general fund would be required to fund the 10 Year Capital Improvement Program beyond projects projected for referendum or TIF funding. Capital Improvement Update -2- 4. Parks Improvement Fund - You will note that the cash park fee fund should be sufficient to accommodate the park improvement portion of the CIP outside of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and Miller Park improvements. 5. Community Center - This CIP does not show any planned improve- ments for the Community Center other than the $75,000 entry improvements that are projected to be funded through donations or purchasing the bricks. There is a recommendation that the City bond for office accommodations for the recreation staff at either a new City Hall or an expansion to the Community Center to accommodate those staff, if the City Council deter- mines they should remain at the Community Center. It is my understanding members of the Hockey Association will be contacting the City to propose some alternative method to financing a second sheet of ice at the Community Center other than a referendum. I would anticipate they may be suggesting cash park fees or general fund monies for that purpose. 6. Trails Fund - The Majority of the trail system that has yet to be completed within the City is along City streets, which will apparently be budgeted through the Public Works Capital Improvement Program. The major trail improvements within City parks will occur in the following areas: 1991 - Trail along Purgatory Creek between Anderson Lakes Parkway and Staring Lake Parkway - $15,000 1992 - Trail across Purgatory Creek from Antlers Ridge to Branching Horn - $12,000 1992 - Trail along Purgatory Creek from Hwy 5 north and west to Mitchell Road - $20,000 1992 - Woodchip trail in Timber Creek Park - $3,000 1993 - Trail within Hidden Ponds Park west to Highway 101 - $25,000 • 1993 - Trail from Crosstown Hwy 62 along Beach Road; then east to the Hanley property and Bryant Lake Park - $40,000 1995 - Trail along the north end of Red Rock Lake connecting with Boulder Pointe Trail - $30,000 1996 - Trail from Topview Park north to Cardinal Creek Road - $35,000 1998 - Trail connection along Nine-Mile Creek from Smetana Lake north to Lee Data - $40,000 Trails within Smetana Lake Park are also included in the Smetana Lake Park development project. BL:mdd - update/9 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert. Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: July 25, 1990 SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Update At the July 10th special meeting, Council and Commission members reviewed the 1990-2000 Capital improvement Program Projection. Staff specifically reviewed the 1990 projects and projected projects for 1991. Commission and Council members asked questions regarding development of Miller Park projected for a referendum in 1991 or 1992, and questioned future park acquisition funding sources. Lambert indicated that additional parkland will be necessary at Lake Riley, Smetana Lake, Rice Marsh Lake, as well as parks to serve the Crestwood and Cedar Forest areas. Lambert projected C approximately 3.6 million dollars in park acquisition between 1990 and the year 2000. Staff is recommending a general fund budget contribution to a park acquisition fund of $175,000 for 1991, $200,000 for 1992, $225,000 for 1993, and $200,000 for the years 1995, through the year 2000. • At the July 10th meeting Commission and Council members began discussions on the timing of a future park bond referendum. Staff recommended the Commission and the Council delay serious discussion regarding a possible park bond referendum until Bill Morris of Decisions Resources has had an opportunity to analyze the recent community survey to determine what, if any, items might be supported in a referendum. The City Council agreed to meet with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their August 6th meeting to discuss this issue as well as the other items that were not addressed at the July 10th meeting. BL:mdd update/10 1990-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTIONS May 17, 1990 ACQUISITION: Lake Riley - Total $1.150.00Q - Approximately $500,000 is estimated for acquisition of the 24 acre Jacques property in 1990. Funds are budgeted in 1993 through 1997 for projected acquisition of single family residential parcels along the lake south of the existing park and for the additional wooded parcel between the "Jacques property" and the railroad tracks. Timing will be dependent on when the property comes up for sale. The remaining property between the Jacques parcel and the railroad to the east should be acquired as soon as possible. Prairie Bluff Park - Total $500.000 - An estimated acquisition of $500,000 for bluff property along the Minnesota River valley bluffs is projected for 1998, will depend on proposed development of this property. Smetana Lake Park - Total $200.000 - Acquisition of approximately 4 acres is proposed on the north shore of Smetana Lake for public access and limited picnicking. C This is proposed as a joint project with the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District. Rice Marsh Lake Neighborhood Park - Total $300,000 - $150,000/year has been budgeted for 1992 and 1993 to purchate a 15-20 acre parcel on the east end of Rice Marsh Lake that would serve as the neighborhood park for all residential properties north of 212 and west of Mitchell Lake. Crestwood Neighborhood Park - Total $300.000 - $300,000 is budgeted for 1999 acquisition of a neighborhood park to serve the Crestwood area neighborhood. Timing will be dependent on development. Cedar Forest Neighborhood Park - Total $300.000 - $300,000 is budgeted for acquisition of a 15-20 acre neighborhood park parcel to serve the Cedar Forest neighborhood in 1995. Staring Lake Park - $850.000 - Funds are proposed for 1990 thru 1994 for the acquisition of the Boyce property. Funding for this $675,000 acquisition would be accomplished by borrowing from the Utilities Fund and reimbursing at current interest rates. Interest and taxes will bring the total cost to approximately $850,000. The Metropolitan Airports Commission will be negotiating to acquire the Janikula property, ( immediately east of the Boyce property. M.A.C. would be willing to sublease that property for park use, with restrictions. Minnesota River Valley - Total $300.000 - Funds are budgeted for 1996 thru 2000. The City has targeted approximately 160 acres of floodplain land and bluff property along the Minnesota River valley for park purposes that will be tied into the Minnesota River Valley Refuge and Recreation Area. Actual timing for acquisition will depend on when parcels become available for sale. Acquisition costs could vary from donations to extremely expensive, depending on development potential. PARK DEVELOPMENT: Community Center - Total $75.000 - $75,000 is budgeted in 1991 for development of pedestrian vehicular improvements to the access of the Community Center and Community Center parking lot. - Funds should be allocated in 1992 for construction of recreation offices and a storage addition. This is dependent on decisions made for City Hall construction. The City should plan for offices for recreation staff at a new City Hall, if money is not made available for offices at the Community Center. l Round Lake Park - Total $153,000 - $8,000 budgeted in 1990 for softball field fence improvements. - $10,000 budgeted in 1991 for expansion of concrete around they wo park shelters and the entry to the swimming beach area. - $20,000 budgeted for 1991 for extension of the irrigation lines to the turf around the park shelter and tennis court area. - $40,000 budgeted in 1992 to replace the marina building with a combination boat/rental building and satellite maintenance storage facility that will be used for storing mowers, Cushman, weed whips, etc. during the summer months and boat storage during the winter months. - $15,000 budgeted in 1993 for construction of dugouts and extending the bleachers at the baseball field. - $10,000 budgeted in 1994 for extension of foul line fencing and improvements in the baseball field. - $50,000 budgeted in 1998 for lighting softball field #4. Staring Lake Park - Total $55,000 - $15,000 budgeted in 1991 for installation of an irrigation system. - $20,000 budgeted in 1995 for permanent fencing of the two competition softball fields. - $20,000 budgeted in 1997 for irrigation of the two completed softball fields. Riley Lake Park - Total $410.000 - $35,000 budgeted in 1990 and $15,000 in 1991 to accomplish the requirements for the 1988 LAWCON grant, which includes expanding the swimming beach area, moving the boat launch further to the north, realigning Riley Lake Road and expanding parking. - $100,000 budgeted in 1994 for grading and seeding of the Jacques property. - $100,000 budgeted in 1996 for improvements to the park including construction of playground facilities, expansion of parking lot, installation of tennis courts, backstops, and minimal security lighting in the parking lots. - $100,000 budgeted in 1998 for development of the Riley Lake homestead area including improvements to the barn and the main home to be usable for park programs and park maintenance facility. - $50,000 budgeted in 1999 for relocation of the boat launch to the southern corner of the park contingent upon acquisition of all of the single family homes south of the park and west of the railroad tracks. This will also include final expansion of the parking facilities for Riley Lake Park. Miller Park - Total $4.900.000* - $10,000 is budgeted for 1990 to accomplish the minimal construction of a gravel base access and parking lot for a public / boat access, for seeding of the picnic areas, removal of dead vegetation, etc. - $10,000 is budgeted in 1991 for installation of an aeration system. - $300,000 is budgeted in 1992, $2,000,000 in 1993 and $500,090 in 1994 and 1995. Assuming a referendum would be passed in 1991 or 1992, the $300,000 during 1992 would be for planning and engineering fees, the remaining three years of funding would be for development of the park. - $50,000 is budgeted for 1996 and $30,000 for 1999 for completion of park facilities not included in the referendum. - $1,500,000 is allocated in 1998 for construction of an outdoor pool and related facilities. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area - Total $2.625,000 - $25,000 is allocated for 1990 for a water control structure. - $100,000 is budgeted in 1992 for design, specification and engineering fees. - $500,000 is budgeted in 1993 for dredging the boat basin and adjacent ponding facility, and surcharging of entry. - $1,500,000 is budgeted in 1994 for first phase development of the entry, including grading and landscaping. - $500,000 is budgeted in 1996 for second phase development of the entry and completion of the hard surface trail around the entire park, this includes construction of fountains, a shelter, and marina. This entire project should be considered as a T.I.F. project with matching funds from the Watershed District. Other possible sources of revenue include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ducks Unlimited, the Corp of Engineers, and the Eden Prairie Foundation. Homeward Hills Park - Total S50,000 - $30,000 is budgeted in 1990 for completion of the second floor of the park shelter to accommodate year-round programming of that facility. - $20,000 is budgeted in 1992 for irrigation of the soccer field and the softball field. Franlo Park - Total $27,000 - $7,000 is budgeted in 1990 for installation of a permanent chain link fence on the outfield of the baseball field. - $20,000 is budgeted in 1994 for construction of a sun shelter and a softball field fence. Red Rock Lake Park - Total $50,000 - $40,000 is budgeted in 1990 for the 2nd phase of Red Rock Lake Park including, paving the parking lots, tennis court installa- tion, playground structure, and picnic area and installation of an aerator. - $10,000 is budgeted in 1998 for construction of a sun shelter. Preserve Park - Total 565.000 - $10,000 is budgeted in 1993 for regrading the skating rink vest of the hockey rink. - $55,000 is budgeted in 1999 for replacing the park shelter with a new warming house/picnic facility. Prairie East Park - Total 515,000 - $5,000 is budgeted in 1990 for grading and seeding the expanded picnic area and installing a small paved parking lot. - $10,000 is budgeted in 1996 for construction of a sun shelter. Carmel Park - Total $35,000 - $25,000 is budgeted in 1990 for construction of playground equipment, backstop and two tennis courts. - $10,000 is budgeted in 1997 for construction of a sun shelter. Hidden Ponds Park - Total S10,000 -$10,000 is budgeted in 1995 for construction of a sun shelter. Pheasant Woods Park - Total $60,000 $60,000 is budgeted in 1996 for construction of a lighted hockey 1. 1 i r rink and skating rink and construction of a warming house/picnic shelter. Edenbrook Conservation Area - Total $70,000 - $30,000 is budgeted in 1991 for construction of a small parking lot access and looped trail system throughout the park. - $40,00 is budgeted in 1994 for construction of a picnic shelter. Edenvale Park Conservation Area - Total $55.000 - $10,000 is budgeted in 1994 for construction of a loop trail system around the perimeter of the park. This will include one bridge over Purgatory Creek. - $45,000 is budgeted in 1994 for replacing the park shelter/warming house. Purgatory Creek Trail - Total $60,000 - $30,000 is budgeted in 1991 for construction of a trail from Mitchell Road, southeast to the intersection of Highway 5 and Prairie Center Drive, and to construct the creek crossing east of Branching Horn. - $20,000 is budgeted in 1992 to construct the creek crossing east of Homeward Hills Park and to construct the trail from the Staring Lake Park trail southeast under Highway 169 to Sunnybrook C Road. - $10,000 is budgeted in 1995 to construct the trail form Homeward Hills Road adjacent to Creekwood Park, south to County Road 1. Prairie Bluff Park - Total $50.000 -$50,000 is budgeted in 1999 to develop a picnic shelter and trails and parking access to the park on the bluff. Rice Marsh Lake Park - Total $200.000 - $50,000 is proposed for 1995 for grading and seeding of Rice Marsh Lake Park. - $50,000 is proposed for construction of the parking lot, tennis courts and playground structure in 1996. - $100,000 is budgeted in 1997 for final improvements including the trail system along the lakeshore and final improvements to the neighborhood park. Miller Spring - Total $10.000 - $10,000 is budgeted for 1993 for improvements to the spring, which will include moving the spring back away from County Road 4 toward the creek, upgrading the parking lot and improving the design of the pedestrian access to the spring and the visual amenities at the spring. Pioneer Park - Total $120,000 - $50,000 is budgeted in 1993 for grading and seeding. - $30,000 is budgeted in 1994 and 1995 for facility improvements. - $10,000 is budgeted in 1998 for a sun shelter. Willow Park - Total $30.000 - $20,000 is budgeted in 1990 for construction of two tennis courts. - $10,000 is budgeted in the year 2000 for a sun shelter. Cedar Forest Park - Total $150.000 - $50,000 budgeted in 1996 for first phase development including grading, seeding and landscaping. - $100,000 budgeted for 1997 for 2nd phase development including two tennis courts, basketball court, park shelter/warming house, hockey rink and skating rink, and playground structure. Crestwood Park - Total $50.000 - $50,000 budgeted in the year 2000 for 1st phase development of Crestwood Park. { Creekwood Park - Total 55.000 - $5,000 budgeted in 1991 for construction of a parking lot with access onto Homeward Hills Road (includes landscaping and screening for parking lot. • Wyndham Knoll Park - Total $5.000 - $5,000 budgeted in 1992 for construction of trail system to access points and to the Edenbrook Conservation Area. Flying Cloud Fields - Total $155.000 - $55,000 is budgeted in 1990 for construction of a bypass and turn lanes on County Road 1 and to replace backstops on fields 2, 3, and 4. - $20,000 is budgeted in 1991 for paving the park road and parking lots. - $30,000 is budgeted in 1993 for installing an irrigation system to irrigate the entire site, provided that the Metropolitan Airports Commission confirms no expansion in that area for a minimum of 15 years. Prairie View Park - Total $10.000 - $10,000 budgeted in 1990 for trail access to the west. Forest Hills Park - Total 555.000 - $55,000 budgeted in the year 2000 for replacement of the park shelter. ,Smetana Lake Park - $50.000 - $25,000 is budgeted in 1992 and 1993 for trail and park improve- ments proposed as a joint project with the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District. Bike Trail Improvements - Total $270.000 - $50,000 is budgeted in 1990 for improvements to trails along Eden Prairie Road, County Road 1 and within parks such as Red Rock Lake Park and making a connection at Larkspur Lane in the Pre- serve trail system. Other funding includes $15,000 in 1991 for the trail along Purgatory Creek of Anderson Lakes Parkway; $15,000 in 1992 for a creek crossing trail between Antlers Ridge and Branching Horn, the trail in Timber Creek Park; $65,000 in 1993 for the Hidden Ponds Park trail and the Bryant Lake Park access trail; $30,000 in 1995 for completion of the tail along the north shore of Red Rock Lake; $35,000 in 1996 for the Topview Park trail connection to Cardinal Creek Road; $40,000 in 1998 for the Nine-Mile Creek trail north of Smetana Lake. C Cip/c } } ƒ § ` § § § \ § § _ . . , 1 ( @ \ 0 V } ) 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 #k ( " i § ` i § \ § & § § . . eil - m / @ k° NI k IV , _ • 3 L E ; § + § § ■ ® § k _ _ £ / \ _ i 0 § - ~ a , ■ ) 2 § K \ & + , , + § § ; § , e " en ` � § 2 % f 2 . § + O. ! 2 § § & 0. k k M ° N y " 00 § k e 1 | § t \ / \ \ } / ¥ ) f } t ! ; $ - ! 2 2 14 v- \ 3 § / t a s ) f - k \ \ § ! f j k k / f f .. ) ! ® \| r § ! # | ■ ! & e PI _ ( ■ \ - ! ! ! 7 ! &/ , : ! g > - f } | f !! ! | . ■ §Z & ' , § § § - | § ■ F. § ` ! 2 # § § § § § | § § ! ; ! _ ! ® , ` ,- ! ! # § ! § ! ■ ■ ! y § _ ! . § ! _ § § 8 / § „ _ s 8 ¥ - •) \ § § ■ z ! , ! ; § 8 ! r : - | ! # f / } / ! I § ! - : ! § - ■ ! § ! , ; - ! ` | ° , | _ } | / ) / § - q | " f | ® ! ` / ` \ \ - | : 2 = ; i - - . 2 ^ , - - - 2 : ` il k . / ; ~ ; ( = : § . 12, 1 ; \ \ { ) l � 1 ' \ 1 } , ; � { { ! l ' , : } p / ! lkk . ki . ... . . k . . F. } \ i } ) i J (¥ , ! ! ■ ! R 5 - ! / £ } ! ' | § f � } ! !! ! ! ■ ) `* § ! \ } % ® # # § r - - - m ■ !! # ! ! } �2 ■ - a ! . } ■ ; ■ § # ! 1 g ■ - , S . e ! | f l � | A B f e ! § § ■ ■ f ! ! # # ! # I -@ § ! ® i/ , § r4k ! ! \■ $ ■ | }5.si ( § _ ■! ! ! ■ a - � § - - } ! \ , ■ Al # # } °e ■ e ■ !| I! } § ® # §! , . \ ® } - \ ! § § § - ! : § , Ill ' §# , i } n . 2. s , : aa ! . �§ ! ! / ) ; t ! k. } - � f , i - - 1 g ® ® . " � i - i � \ 1 ! } act ; ,, | } - t ! 1 } ) ; K . \ l221 : = ! Q i «/ k ! a - = ; f | § ! ! ' - rtt1 ! ! T ; ¥. � - - } MEMORANDUM CTO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ,ate/ DATE: June 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Landscape Medians The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission have spent a number meetings discussing City beautification. One of the major areas of concern is the grass median strip along Prairie Center Drive in the Major Center Area. The Commission requested infor- mation on the cost to construct and maintain landscaping within these medians. Attached to this memo is a memo from Barb Cross with projections for construction and maintenance of various land- scape designs. Upon review of those figures, the Commission agreed that installation and maintenance of large flower beds in those areas is probably not feasible at this point in the City's develop- ment, but also requested that landscaping of medians be discussed with the City Council at a special meeting. Some suggestions fdr improvements to medians include: installation of trees, and smaller areas of flower beds at a limited number of intersections. It has been suggested that perhaps a landscaping plan for all of Prairie Center Drive should be developed and included in the tax increment financing program for street imprpve- ments in this area. Commission members have also discussed the desirability of improving the image of Eden Prairie by landscaping or planting flowers along State and County roads where they enter the Eden Prairie City limits. Bud Baker suggested that the City strongly urge the State and County to do that sort of thing to Highway 494, State Highway 5, and 169 before the PGA in 1991. Commission members will look forward to discussing these ideas at the July 10th meeting with the City Council. BL:mdd medians/10 MEMORANDUM Cir TO: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect . DATE: November 15, 1989 SUBJECT: Follow-up to Landscape Medians Staff has done another cost estimate for medians using the existing sod and planting salt tolerant shade trees 25' on center. Two cost estimates sheets are attached. One includes the cost for irriga- tion, the second includes maintenance costs for watering. Both estimates include mowing and trimming costs for each growing season. A typical median is 800'. At a spacing of 25' on center 30 trees would be needed for an average median. The estimated cost for 30 balled and burlapped trees is $200 per tree installed, or $6,000 for 30 trees. Mowing will be a yearly maintenance expense. For estimating purposes, I have made the following assumptions. Mowing would be done with seasonal people calculated at $8 per 1000 sq. ft. or $105 per median per mowing.* Costs for 28 mowings are $2,940 per year. Watering trees can be done in two ways. The first is an irrigation system. An estimated cost for an irrigation system for an average median is $6,550. This is a one time expense for the initial installation. Watering can also be done with the City crews using a water truck. The following assumptions were made for cost estimates. Water truck would be used once a week with full-time personnel. Costs are estimated to be $10 per 1000 sq. ft. , or a $133 per watering. The watering season would be approximately from May 1 through September 15th. Total watering costs for the summer would be $2,600. Watering in this fashion would be necessary once a week while the trees are young and then subsequently dependent on weather. Start up costs for this landscape improvement program would be $11,540* for a system with our City crews doing the watering, or $15,490 for a median with an irrigation system. Yearly maintenance costs for the irrigated system would just be mowing and trimming for about $2,940 per year. Maintenance costs without an irrigation system would be $2,940 for mowing and $2,600 for watering, for a total of $5,550. Again, this watering would be necessary while the trees are young, and dependent on weather thereafter. `, Costs for shade trees in the medians along Prairie Center Drive from Valley View Road to 169 have been calculated based on 4800 �; 1 d linear feet. Initial costs with an irrigation system for the entire project would be $92,940. Maintenance costs for mowing and Ctrimming for the entire project would be $17,640 per year. Project costs for the landscaped medians not including irrigation would be $69,240. Maintenance costs for mowing, trimming and watering would be $33,240 per year. If the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission decides to go ahead with this project, thought should be given as to how this plan will be implemented. Questions for discussion might be: 1. What are the next steps in the process? 2. Who will coordinate the project? 3. Who will contact private businesses, clubs, etc.? 3 4. How will money accounts be set up for donations? *28 mowings will be required if the medians are mowed once a week from April 8-October 20th. { SL:mdd ' C I MEMORANDUM �+ TO: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect DATE: October 31, 1989 SUBJECT: Landscaping Medians and/or Major Intersections Landscaping within center medians is an eye catching way to beautify the City of Eden Prairie. Before decisions can be made as to how and where the landscaping should be placed, the parks, recreation and natural resources staff has gathered the following information and concerns: DESIGN A wide array of design alternatives are possible, using plant materials, paving, planters and lighting as the basic building blocks. The different colors and textures of plant materials should be utilized to provide the most impact and visual stimulation. Flowers in bloom all season would provide the biggest splash of color. Annual flowers bloom more profusely all summer in a wider variety of colors than do perennials. Shrubs provide some screening between lanes and provide vertical relief to the flatness of the roadway. Flowering shrubs will add color as well as height to the median. A plain green shrub mass would provide a solid backdrop accentuating the color of the flower beds. Trees planted within medians provide shade from the heat and glare of roadways. Trees also define the roadways channeling the vehicle through a space rather than across a flat sector of pavement. Other amenities that help decorate landscaped areas are special paving such as brick, colored concrete and bomanite. These paving surfaces clean up edges, and keep maintenance for turf areas to a minimum in an attractive way. Planters for shrub masses and flower beds are commonly used to add interest and give height, and they also break the monotony of roadside plantings. F ( Decorative lighting is also an item that would give character and identity to the medians within the City. 'y r S UNAPPROVED MINUTES �. {� EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989 -8- VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Reports of Landscape Architect 1. Landscaping and Flowers for Medians Refer to memo dated October 31, 1989 from Barb Cross, Landscape Architect. Cross said she toured the landscaped medians in the Twin Cities area prior to doing her report. She said that flowers provide the biggest accent, !. shrubs provide screening and vertical relief to the flatness of the road, trees provide shade and 1. prevent glare. Special paving and decorative lighting can also be used. In discussions with MnDot, Cross was told that median strips between road sections are used as 1 drainage swales and are not available for landscaping. Maintenance is the responsibility of the City and they had a concern with the crews accessing the site because of the high speeds of traffic on these roadways. Hennepin County said that the City would be responsible for any damage that occurred due to snow or salt and they could not approve anything 1 that is unyielding to a vehicle, i.e. tree trunks �. and lights. Site distance problems at intersections would also have to be addressed. The Public Works Department said that maintenance is their biggest concern. Medians should be clear for landscaping and he was not concerned with maintenance vehicles working in these areas if tE they avoid the busy times of the day. The major intersections into the City which should be considered for landscaping are 494, Hwys. 169/212, Hwy. 5, Co. Rd. 1, Dell Road, Eden Prairie Road, Baker Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. Planting in the right-of-way is not recommended except for shrubs and flowers or possibly planters. Cost estimates are as follows: flowers only $6970; flowers and trees $7020; trees, shrubs and flowers $7925; shrubs and flowers $8700. These cost are per median and include installation and labor. An average median is 1800' long and 13,000 sq. ft. 1 .\ 1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989 -9- 'a Baker asked how much of the cost is labor. Cross said that if seasonal help is used, the cost would be about $1500 and if full time help is used, the cost would be about $4000. Cross added that the initial cost is more for trees and shrubs; however, this is not a cost that is incurred every year. Flowers are an ongoing expense and would have to be replaced annually. Cross said that two water trucks are shared by the Park Department and the Street Department and can be driven by full time personnel only at a cost of $16 per hour. Use of these trucks is not guaranteed. There are also two pickup trucks with water tanks that can be driven by seasonal help, but watering would be done on a much slower basis. Other costs involved with flowers include weeding, removing dead flower heads and litter removal. There are 34 medians in the City. Total costs for all medians are: flowers only $504,193; flowers / and trees $481,332; flowers, shrubs and trees $398,293 i\ and shrubs and flowers $296,120. Cross added that an irrigation system should also be discussed at a cost of $6550 per median or a total of $222,700 for all medians. r Cross felt that there were two ways to start a landscaping project. One is to do a large area very simply and the other is to do a small area very well. Staff's suggestion is to start with the intersection of Co. Rd. 4 and Valley View Road near Round Lake Park. Cook said he does not agree with starting in Round Lake Park. Lambert commented that Barb's report was not meant to discourage the landscaping project, but rather to advise the commission what expenses would be involved. He added that the City Council is looking at cutting back the budget and does not know how they would feel about a project of this type. He agrees that one area should be done initially to see what the reaction is and whether any local businesses would be willing to fund it. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989 C -10- Mikkelson commented that he did not think the suggestion was to do the project on such a large scale. Baker said he feels the City Council should be • approached with the suggestion. He has discussed the project with several people and one idea was to have a contest in 5 to 10 locations perhaps with materials donated by the City and have civic organizations either provide the labor or donate money for the project. Lambert said that in speaking with the City Manager, using volunteers or civic organizations would be working in a median would be a liability concern. Baker said that perhaps the City could ask for contributions and erect a plaque announcing the sponsor. Lambert suggested planters at intersections because of all the underground wiring in these locations for traffic signals, etc. Cross said she hesitates to provide a landscape in plan for intersections because they are all so different. • Cook said he feels that residents of Eden Prairie will be of the opinion that funds should be used for other purposes rather than landscaping. Richard said he feels that Prairie Center Drive from Rainbow to Lunds is an important area to consider landscaping for three reasons: many businesses are located in this area, there is a good deal of traffic and there are large medians to work with. He said the landscaping should be kept very simple and done completely through donations. Joyer commented that residents took notice of the flowers that were planted at Staring Lake. She felt that landscaping should begin at Round Lake or Riley Lake, but is in favor of the idea. Helling said she feels that the intersection by Round Lake Park would be an ideal location to begin. She felt that either the Lions Club or Optimists Club might be willing to fund it. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989 -11- Mikkelson agreed and added that a plaque showing the sponsors of the landscaping would be seen easily, as many people walk in this area. MOTION: Richard moved to recommend that the landscaping project in Eden Prairie begin by planting trees along the boulevard 30' from center on Prairie Center Drive from Valley View Road to Hwy. 169 and that Barb Cross bring designs and costs for this project back to the commission with the objective that the City spend no money. On call for discussion, Cook said that he feels landscaping at Round Lake Park should be done separately regardless of the decision made on landscaping in other areas of the City. Karpinko seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. B. Reports of Manager of Recreation Services 1. Adaptive Recreation Program Update Refer to memo dated October 30, 1989 from Beth Timm, Adaptive Recreation Supervisor. Beth reported that the adaptive recreation program was begun 18 months ago and includes both segregated • and integrated programs. She showed the commission a slide show on highlights of the program during the summer. 103 children participated in the program, 8 of them from Eden Prairie. Eden Prairie is the newest member of the cooperative program which also includes Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Some activities included in the program are playground, art camp (Edina), swimming lessons and teen center (Bloomington). 2. Youth Athletic Association Appreciation Dinner Belling said that a recap of the event and expenses involved were included in the packets. 135 people were invited and 68 attended. 16 businesses donated door prizes valued at $450 for the event. Expenses included $400 for Mark Rosen as the speaker, printing costs, a plaque for each of the athletic association I. presidents, supplies, hors d'oevres and dinner which were contracted with the school district. 169/212, and also along Single Tree Lane. Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works, expressed similar thoughts and they are as follows: . Maintenance was his biggest concern and he wanted the Park Department to be responsible for maintenance including plant replacement if any landscaping should occur. He said the gets "lots of complaints about the maintenance of the medians strips and would be very glad for somebody else to assume the headaches". . Most of the utilities are buried in the ROW, but medians should be clear with the exception of electric wires for stop signals • and storm sewer. He thought for the most part they would be deep enough to not cause us any problems. . Mr. Dietz stated he was not concerned with maintenance vehicles if the city was careful to avoid busy times during the day to service the medians. Entrances to the City have been identified on the map. Primary entrances would be the MnDot Highways 494, 169/212, Highway 5, County Road 1, Dell Road, Eden Prairie Road, Baker Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. These well travelled entrances into the City are prime locations where landscaping could occur to announce Eden Prairie. County Road 18 is scheduled to be upgraded within the next 5 years. This construction schedule may affect timing or coordinating joint efforts. + Major intersections which are very visible or heavily traveled have also been shown on the map as possible sites for landscape improvements. • Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works for Eden Prairie, had more concerns with planting off the streets in the ROW areas than in the medians. He said in order to keep costs down, most City streets only have a 50' ROW. The City also requires new developments to bury electric, telephone, and cable TV lines during construction. With a typical road at 28' it only leaves 11; on each side of the roadway to bury gas lines, electric lines, water lines, cable TV and telephone lines. Underground utilities will be more prevalent at intersections where new subdivisions and building has taken place. City Code directs property owners not to install plant materials within the City ROW to keep clear of all of these buried utilities. Mr. Dietz also stated that visibility and site distance problems can occur when plantings are within the ROW, and feels the City policy is a good one. A property owner can plant a tree on their property 11' from the roadway, which also gives the City room to store snow without damaging trees. Limited tree and shrub planting would still be acceptable as long ( as utilities and site distance are respected. Flower beds would, for the most part, not interfere with site distance or utilities. A myriad of possibilities exist for design of these medians. �r Budget, safety , and maintenance concerns are factory that will influence the design of these areas. LOCATION Highly visible places for planting landscape materials have been identified on a map. They have been broken down into major entrances into the city, major or visible intersections, and existing medians which could be landscaped. The Minnesota Department of Transportation owns all right-of-ways along I494 and 212/169. They are responsible for all improvements and maintenance to these highways. i was unable to reach the key person to get preliminary approval, but in my discussions the following unofficial information and concerns were obtained: . The median strips between the road sections in this area are used as drainage swales during storms and are not available. . If permission is granted to plant along some of the upper slopes, maintenance of these areas is the responsibility of the City. . A concern was expressed as to how City crews would access the site. Due to the high speeds o these roadways, cars at slow speeds entering, exiting or working could cause a serious risk to health and property.rf • Hennepin County is responsible for two large stretches where medians occur. The first is Valley View Road from Mitchell Road east to Highway 169/212. The second is Mitchell Road from Valley View, south to Highway 5. I spoke to Dennis Hansen with Hennein County and he expressed the following thoughts and concerns: . Maintenance is currently the responsibility of the County. If the City does any planting it would be up to the City to maintain the medians. The City would have to accept liability for all plant materials lost due to snow removal and storage, salt and chemical damage or accidents. . The County would not approve anything that was unyielding if a vehicle should jump a curve. Tree trunks and light standards would be examples of unyielding objects. Hansen stated that flowers or shrubs would be acceptable. Site distance problems at intersections would need to be addressed so shrubs would not block views. �. . The City would have to go through h a see any reason it would not be approved process, but he didn't above concerns. if we complied with the The City of Eden Prairie maintains the medians along Prairie Center Drive from Highway 5, south along the ring road and back up to 1 _ Planters could also be utilized to keep clear of utility lines and r to give intersections a more polished look. 1 COST AND MAINTENANCE Due to the wide variety of design options and the different sizes of medians, the following cost projections are preliminary and are intended to give a ballpark estimate for comparison and discussion. Further cost estimates need to be undertaken as the designs are more finalized. In order to facilitate discussion, I have broken the medians down into 4 categories to give estimated costs. The drawing shows a sample of what each category could look like. Please keep in mind these are only possibilities and not the finished product. Broken down cost estimates are on the attached sheets, but bottom line costs for an average median of 13,000 sq. ft. are shown as follows: 1. flowers only - $6,970 per median 2. flowers and shade or ornamental trees - $7,020 per median 3. trees, shrubs and flowers - $7,925 pr median 4. shrubs and flowers - $8,700 per median For the most part estimated prices include labor for installation. Construction and landscape projects such as this are normally contracted out due to the heavy work load of our City crews. The flower planting will be an annual event and it is the only cost estimate that the .labor for the City crews have included. Two estimates are listed for the City personnel. 4A is the cost for seasonal help assuming $6 per hour. 4B is the cost of our full- time help using the $6 per hour figure. In order to simplify the bottom line, I have used the seasonal help figure in the tdtal since if this project were implemented, more seasonal people would be needed. Maintenance cost have not been included in these cost estimates. The cost of maintaining these medians will vary greatly depending on what is planted, detailing and if the median is irrigated. COSTS FOR TREES AND SHRUBS Occasionally a shrub or tree will need to be replaced due to drought, snow storage, or salt damage, but the expense will not be incurred each year. Maintenance for trees and shrubs will require daily or weekly waterings while the plants are young, but when the plant is established and edging and mulch is used and properly installed, maintenance costs are reasonably low and for the most part limited to weekly watering, weeding and litter pickup. Annual flowers will be an ongoing yearly expense. Costs each year must include the price of the flowers, as well as labor costs for installation and maintenance. Mid May is the best time to plant f, annual flowers and unfortunately it is also one of the busiest times for our park maintenance crew. In order for this project to be implemented and still get our parks ready for use, additional help must be obtained. Additional seasonal park maintenance people or contracted employees would be realistic, since the scale of this project would probably be larger than volunteers would undertake. Watering flowers is also labor intensive. With little shade and the heat from the surrounding pavement, our park crews estimate watering will be needed every other day unless rain is frequent. .. The City has two water trucks, which according to union contracts can only be driven by full-time City personnel at the $16/hour labor rate. Our Park Manager estimated $10 per 1000 sq. ft. or 131 per median for each time the flowers are watered. The City water trucks are shared by the Park Department and the Street Department. Use of the water trucks is not guaranteed, especially when City street crews are seal coating roads and trails. The City also have two pickup trucks with tanks that will hold 250 gallons of water. These trucks may be driven by seasonal help in at the lower hourly rate, but it would be a much slower process due limited capacity and pressure. The Park Manager estimates both trucks would be in service the majority of time if all the medians are planted, removing two trucks from the City fleet. Other costs involved with flower maintenance to keep them looking good, would include weeding, removing dead flower heads to stimulate blooming and litter removal. Sod has also been .included on the plans as a possible ground cover N. to break up flower and shrub beds. While probably not as labor intensive as flowers, sod needs to be cut, trimmed, and watered to keep it looking good. Mowing and trimming costs are estimated.to be $8 per 1000 sq. ft. using City equipment and seasonal help. The costs that have been presented this far are costs for an average 13,000 sq. ft. median. They vary somewhat in size and shape, but 34 medians exist within Eden Prairie and could be part of an overall beautification scheme. Costs are shown below for each one of the 4 categories including maintenance. Estimates include the following assumptions. Flower watering is done with full-time people and the City water truck 3 times per week from May 1 to September 15th. Mowing is done with seasonal people once a week from April 8 to October 20th. Dividing the maintenance figure by 34 will give you the maintenance cost for an average median. #1 Flowers materials and labor annual maintenance $V36,953 '67 240 $504,193 J2 Flowers and trees lr materials and labor annual maintenance - water $226,440 $238,572 i. mowing $16,320 242.760 $481,332 i(;I 113 Flowers Shruh and Trees materials and labor annual maintenance $269,365 128,928 $398,293 14 Shrubs and FloWers materials and labor maintenance $296,119.60 189,720.00 $485,840.60 The figures above present a more realistic view of costs to do all the medians within the City. Maintenance expenses are ongoing yearly expenses. Once the project is started materials and labor expenses are also ongoing expenses when flowers are part of the design. An irrigation system is something that should be discussed as part of this project. Although, initially very expensive, the installation of an irrigation system would solve many problems. It would eliminate the availability problem of getting the water truck and leave the 2 pickup trucks free for watering plants and flowers within the parks system. It would also eliminate any traffic hazards created by the water truck as it is parked next to the median or while accessing the site. Preliminary cost estimates show a system would be approximately $500 per 1000 sq. ft. to irrigate, or about $6,550 for an average median. If all ''the medians in town were done, $222,700 would be the projected cost. The payback period for only flowers would be less than one year. The payback time for flowers, trees and shrubs would be 1.7 years. Other suggestions to cut down maintenance expenses would be to maximize the use of shrubs and trees saving flower beds for accent areas. The use of hard surface materials around sign posts would save weekly trimmings. Techniques such as week control fertilizer, edging and mulch can also greatly cut down maintenance expenses. STAFF RECOMMEND TIONS This project has the potential to make our city a truly beautiful city. Virtually everyone driving by will notice our landscaped medians. This project also has the potential to be a real source of complaints, if initial design and maintenance are not what the public expects to see. Whatever the City does must be done well and taken care of properly in order to achieve the goals of • beautifying the City of Eden Prairie. There are two ways to begin a project like this depending on the objectives of the Commission and Council. The first is to do \. a R } large area very simply such as trees in the medians and increase plant materials as money is available. The other option for implementation is to take a small area and focus time and money on an area that shines. The first scheme would make an impact on a large number of people due to the area the improvements cover. The second scheme would make a large impact on a smaller number of people because it is limited in only one area. Both of these strategies have merit. Consistency in design and materials will be crucial to keep the project tied together. One suggestion, if the Commission wants to pursue this, is to select the intersection of County Road 4 and Valley View Road. The entire western half of this highly visible intersection is already owned by the City. If money is available, medians could also be developed. OUESTIONS THE COMMISSION AND COUNCIL SHOULD ADDRESS ARE: Location of Improvements 1. Where are the improvements going to be located? Medians and or intersections? 2. Should the project be phased? What areas are most important and would give the most impact for the dollar? Design Concerns (� 1. Which option P (1-4) is best for the City considering all factors? 2. Are there some options not shown which would work better? 1 Budget Concern 1. Where will the funding come from? 2. Who will organize funds from business leaders? 3. How much money is needed or available? Safety and Maintenance Concerns I' 1. Should the City pay to irrigate the landscaped medians? 2. Should the City allow trees (unyielding objects) on center islands? BPC:mdd i / MEMORANDUM Cl� TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: June 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Trails and Sidewalk Policy Members of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission suggested the Commission and the Council discuss the policy on where the Commission should be recommending the installation of trails and sidewalks when reviewing development proposals. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission generally follows the guidelines approved in the Park and Open Space System Plan that recommend the construction of 8' asphalt trails along collector streets and minor arterials. "The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department has recommended requiring developers to construct 8' wide asphalt hike- way/bikeways along collector streets that will generate sufficient traffic to warrant concern for either pedestrian or bicycle use C/ within the road right-of-way. City staff has recommended that 1 developers be required to construct sidewalks along those resi- dential streets that can accommodate bicycle traffic, but would be hazardous for pedestrian use, and along both sides of all streets within the MCA commercial area. In situations of heavy bike,and pedestrian traffic, the City may require an 8' wide bituminous bike trail on one side of the street, and a 5' concrete sidewalk on the opposite." This issue is suggested for discussion because there seems to be some inconsistency between the recommendations of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and that of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission tends to recommend the installation of concrete sidewalks on both sides of most streets, with the exception of cul-de-sacs. Although the recommendation of constructing a sidewalk on both sides of the street eliminates the argument as to which side of the street the sidewalk should be placed, and provides equal access to a safe pedestrian trail from both sides of the street, that recommendation does depart from the historical philosophy that the City would only be recommending the construction and maintenance of the least amount of trailways and sidewalks necessary to provide safe pedestrian and bicycle access to the "spine trail system". If the Council prefers sidewalks on both sides of the street wher- ever sidewalks are recommended, the Council should consider expand- ing the required right-of-way along those streets from 50 to 60 feet in order to accommodate sidewalks on both sides, as well as utilities that must be placed in the right-of-way. r BL:mdd l sidewalk/10 1 { .I ) MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THRU: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: August 3, 1990 SUBJECT: Request from Eden Prairie Boosters Attached is a letter from Charles Tebelius, past President of the Eden Prairie Boosters, requesting authorization to install a "Records Board" for the boy's and girl's swimming and diving teams in the pool area of the Eden Prairie Community Center. This Records Board would be 16' wide by B' high and would have an aluminum frame with a red fabric background. The letters would be white. Mr. Tebelius has indicated three proposed locations for the board, the first priority location is the east wall beginning over the entrance to the men's dressing room and extending to the right toward the clock. This location is preferred because of its prox- imity to the pool entrance and to the spectator seating area. The use of this location would require the relocation of the security light or the partial covering of the grill over the alarm bell. City staff are not in favor of covering any portion of the grill over the fire alarm bell; therefore, the security light would have to be moved at the expense of the Eden Prairie Boosters. The City has taken great care to choose complimentary colors in all parts of the Community Center and for all wall covering. Existing colors in the Community Center are - wall colors of white and blue with accent colors of green and orange for hand railing and air handling units. The request for a red background for this Records Board is to match the color the Eden Prairie High School colors of red and black. The City staff recommendation for a color back- ground would be to match the existing blue of the walls, or simply use black which is the background of the other information boards in the Community Center, rather than use colors that are not com- patible to the color scheme of the building. This may seem like a rather trivial concern, but this Records Board will be a perma- nent part of the building and should fit in with the existing and future color schemes of the building. Mr. Tebelius indicated that he would contact other members of the Board prior to Monday night's meeting to determine how strongly members felt regarding the background color of this records board. Mr. Tebilius will be in attendance to discuss this issue at the August 6th meeting. BL:mdd '�� EDEN PRAIRIE BOOSTERS BOARD OF DIRECTORS July 30, 1990 Pres.—Chides Teb•Ilue V.P.—Barb Vanderploeg V.P.—John Bruns Se—Peggy Grinnell Ms Laurie Helling Tress.—Day*Anderson Eden Prairie Recreation Manager TorneA,k« Eden Prairie Community Center Sueeaker 16700 Valley View Road • Donna Beeson Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Larry Beeson Helen Bergren Dear Ms Helling: Diana Blapdon Larry Blapdon Paul Brown The Eden Prairie Booster Club, an organization composed Beth Bruns of parents of Eden Prairie High School students, has Madicota made a commitment to Eden Prairie High School to Andy Ferlancek purchase and install a Records Board for the Boys and Be11iarryKonya Girls Swimming/Diving Teams. Our proposal, which has Tom Myers been accepted by EPHS, is conditioned on approval by Gary Soderberg the City of Eden Prairie to the installation of the Kathy Soderberg board in the Community Center swimming Sandy Tebellue pool area. The DelVanderoloeg High School has agreed to install the board and to its Burdett wesaene upkeep and maintenance. • During the past year I have had several discussions with Tom Eastman regarding the board and its location. He advised me that he alone could not approve the installation but that he would favorably recommend it to the Park t: Recreation Department subject to an agreed wall location. He pointed out that ''graphics" on any of the pool walls could not be covered. The proposed record board consists of 4 panels, each measuring 4ft wide by Bft high for a total measurement of 16ft wide by Oft high. The bottom of the board is to be mounted Oft above the pool deck. The board will be purchased from Charles Mayer Studios, Inc. of Akron, Ohio. It will have an aluminum frame with a hook 'n • loop type fabric to which the letters are attached. The fabric will be red and the letters will be white. Minnetonka installed this identical board (except for color) at its .Intermediate School Pool in 19B9. Both Tom Eastman and Ray Mitchell (EP School District) have P.O.BOX 443-033•EDEN PRAIRIE,MN 55340 cf, • • . / a EDEN PRAIRIE BOOSTERS / • /I ,,f27 Your favorable recommendation and assistance is OOARD OF DIRECTORS requested in obtainingthe necessary ap provals from thePrea_ChuosTabeeua VP.—Barb Vanderploeg City of Eden Prairie. Our objective is to have the V.P.—Jahn Bruns board installed for the Fall '90 Girls Season. I am See.—PegyGrinnell prepared to provide you and the City representatives Treas.—Dave Anderson with pictures of similiar boards, a sample of the e TomAe,k.r fabric, samples of the 'letters and a diagram of the SwBeka placement on the West wall. I would like to arrange a Donna Beeson meeting as quickly as possible. My phone number is Larry Beeson 941-5030. Helen Berpnn Dona Blapdon tarry elapdon The Eden Prairie Booster Club-is prepared to work with Paul Brown you and to resolve any and all concerns so that this Beth Bruns board can be installed to the benefit of both the • Mark Cote Community Center and the School District. Andy Ferlaneek • Betty Ferleneek Larry Konya Thant:—you in advance for your assistance. Tom Myers earySoderbarp Sincerely, Kathy Soderberg Sandy TebellusDel derplell. "' pv// / w Burdett Wessell. - I Charles E. Tebeli • cc: ert Lambert, Director, Parks Recreation tr Natural Resources Steve Schultz, EPHS Activities Director • P.O.BOX 443-033•EDEN PRAIRIE.MN 5534E THERE WILL BE A 6:00 PM SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING BEFORE THE REGULAR MEETING TO REVIEW THE BLACK & VEATCIH WATER STUDY. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 1990 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas Tenpas CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. Joint City Council/Historical & Cultural Commission meeting held Page 1885 November 14 1969 B. Special City Council meeting held November 14, 1989 Page 1886 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List Page 1887 8. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, PHASE II by International School of Page 188B Minnesota Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 4-9D, Zoning District Amendment within the Public District; Approval of Supplement to Developer's Agreement for International School; Adoption of Resolution No. 90-205, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 4-90 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-211, Site Plan Approval (Ordinance No. 4-90 - Zoning Oistrict Amendment; Resolution No. 90-205 - Authorizing Summary and Publication; Resolution No. 90-211 - Site Plan Approval) City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,August 21, 1990 C. Resolution with State of Minnesota for Bicycle Trail Easements Page 1896 (Resolution No. 90 9OT- D. Commendation Congratulating Girls 16 and Under Fast Pitch Page 1901 Softball Team E. Authorize Acquisition of Utility and/or Street Easements for Page 1902 Properties Along Summit Drive, I. 166 (Resolution No. 90-215) F. Authorize Acquisition of Easements for Construction of Mitchell Page 1903 Road, I.C.. 52-156 (Resolution No. 90-213) G. Authorize Acquisition of Utility and Drainage Easements Over Page 1904 Property at 11500 W. 78th Street Resolution No. 90-2T4J H. Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Ordering Page 1905 Preparation of Proposed T90 Special Assessment Rolls and Setting Hearing DatejResolution No. 90-212) I. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Bluff Road, I.C. 52-144 Page 1908 J. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Cedar Ridge Storm Sewer, I.C.. Page 1909 52-152 K. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Country Glen, I.C.. 52-171 Page 1910 L. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Study for Local Page 1912 Improvements for Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane, I.C.. 52-212 (Resolution No. 90-208) M. GUILLE ADDITION by David & Linda Guille. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Page 1916 No. 24-89, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.47 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Guille Addition; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-191, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 24-B9 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. (Ordinance No. 24-89 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-191 - Authorizing Summary and Publication) N. Approve Final Plat for Guille Addition Located at the Southeast Page 1923 Corner of Twin Lakes Crossing and Starrwood Cir Te--(Resolution No. 90-209T- 0. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 31-90, Declaring Moratorium on Page 1926 Development pi the LandfiTl— P. Resolution No. 90-216 Proclaiming September 9 _ 16, 1990 as Page 1941 "Senior Awareness Week" Q. Approve Plans and Specifications for I.C. 52-197 Delegard Page 1943 Propertyitary Sewer and I.C. 50-198 LosClder Property Sanitary Sewer (Reso utution No. 90-204) ( City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,August 21, 1990 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VILLAGE KNOLLS by Argus Development. Request for Planned Unit Page 1944 Development Concept Review on 42.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 8.7 acres, Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single family lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for a residential development. Location: East of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive. (Resolution No. 90-166 - PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-167 - Preliminary Plat) (Continued from July 17, 1990) B. CEDAR RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Westar Properties, Inc. Request for Page 1977 Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 23.37 acres with variances to be reviewed by Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 23.37 acres into 54 single family lots and road right-of- way. Location: North of County Road 1, west of Cedar Ridge Estates at Rogers Road (Ordinance No. 28-90 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-210 - Preliminary Plat) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 1998 VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. BORUCKI ADDITION by Jim Borucki. Request for Preliminary Plat of page 1999 .62 acres into 2 single family lots within the R1-13.5 Zoning District with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. Location: 6517 Rowland Road. (Resolution No. 90-200 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from August 7, 1990 B. Summary of Findings on the Proposed Frying Cloud Airport Noise Page 2014 Abatement Plan (Res0iUti0n No. 90-171) Continued from July 17, 99� 0 VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Resident Request Regarding Sidewalk Facilities on Summit Orive, Page 2046 Meadowvale Drive and Red Oak Drive, I.C.. 52-166 B. 1989 Audit Report VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Manager 1. Set Special City Council meetings Page 2051 City Council Agenda - 4 - Tues.,August 21, 1990 C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1. Cooperative Agreement with School District to Improve Page 2052 Backstops for Baseball and Soccer Fields at Round Lake 1 School Parci— i 2. Proposal for Consultant Services for Acquisition of Property Page 2056 and Easements Necessary to Proceed with the FirstRhase of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area 3. Review Policy on Permits for Temporary Shelters, Tents and Page 2061 Canopies in City Parks 4. Consider Options for Tours of the River Valley Page 2064 F. Report of Finance Director G. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Award Contract for Water Plant Instrumentation Maintenance Service, 5210 Resolution No. 90-206) 2. Award Contract for Fire Hydrant Painting, I.C. 52-211 TResolution No.90-207) 3. Discussion on Updated Cost for Pedestrian Bridge at the Page 2068 Intersection of T.H. 5 and CSAH No. 4 XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT } EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING HISTORICAL CULTURAL COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1989 6:00 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, and Douglas Tenpas COMMISSION MEMBERS: Gwen Barker, Chairperson; John Hensrud, Robert Alan McCluskey, Mark Peterson, Deb Campbell Potter, Richard Schuette STAFF MEMBERS: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City Manager Craig Dawson, Recreation Supervisor Sandy Werts, Recording Secretary Deb Edlund I. ROLL CALL All members present. II. STATEMENT OF OPPORTUNITIES A. 1989 Highlights Gwen Barker presented the 1989 highlights as the addition of the historic programmer as a part-time staff position, the Turn-of-the Century Christmas Party. In addition, at the Cummins-Grill Homestead, the security system had been installed, the lighting system was in the process of installation and 2 acres of peonies had been planted. The performing and fine arts division had won the Teddy Award for a variety show presented in January, 1989, a successful Concert in the Park season had received support from young audiences in the school system for presentations, and several art shows had been presented throughout the year. The Commission had developed a special brochure, visited several of the schools throughout the area to let school personnel how who the Historical Cultural Commission was and how it could work with the school, additional schools would be visited in the future. Sun Bonnet Days had been the most successful to date. The Commission had added a liaison to the Historical Society. Barker concluded by stating that the Commission was looking forward to the 1990's and was interested in doing even more things in the future. The City Council concurred that the accomplishments of the past year were impressive. City Council Minutes 2 November 14, 1989 1 B. Review of Existing Commission Structure S Deb Campbell Potter stated that the Historical Cultural Commission had seen a lot of growth over the years. A Performing Arts Committee had been established, the Restoration Committee had begun in 1982, and Sun Bonnet Days had a standing committee. Art displays at the City Hall were added in the 1980's. Potter discussed the Commission's long-range goals. The Commission was looking at the possibility for the development of a historical and cultural center at the Starring Lake site. Potter stated that the Commission would like to sponsor larger scale programs and to combine historical and fine art activities. The Commission was also looking at creating more opportunities for family activities. Another goal was to develop a more effective internal structure to work with other groups in the community. Over the years the Commission has realized the need to separate the strategic and tactical applications; the Commission members are doing to much of the actual work and more time is needed in the planning area. C. Vision of the 1990's III. PROPOSAL FOR FUTURE A. How to Fulfill Opportunity Robert McCluskey stated that the problem in the past had been the operational development of committees. The proposal at this time would be to establish two additional subcommittees; a standard cultural committee and an adhoc committee and a standard historical committee and an adhoc committee. This plan would strengthen the strategic planning process. McCluskey believed that this approach would provide a broader base of participation from the committees. A position would be established for a person to recruit members from the community to serve on the committees. B. Relationship of Historical & Cultural Commission to Historical Society McCluskey stated that a main question for consideration was if the cultural and historical aspects should be handled by separate commissions. He added that there was a natural bonding of the two groups which made it difficult to separate them. The combination of the two commissions created a broader base of interest and projects. The Commission had looked into how other communities handled this situation and added that the Commission had worked hard to maintain a broader view of the community. McCluskey stated that there was a strong C 'J City Council Minutes 3 November 14, 1989 tendency to specialize but believed a group needed to present which maintained a broader view. C. Heritage Preservation Ordinance John Hensrud stated that the purpose of the Heritage Preservation Ordinance was to become a certified local government. This would allow the City to receive certain funds which were not available at this time. The Ordinance would establish a preservation process from a legal standpoint. The draft before the City Council this evening was based on the Red Wing Heritage Preservation Ordinance. The main substance contained in Subdivision 3 was to establish a criteria for historical sites. The Ordinance would be presented to the Planning Commission first and then if approved presented to the City Council. Hensrud said that public hearings would be held by the Historical Cultural Commission prior to hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Hensrud reviewed the main points of the ordinance. Hensrud stated that the Commission would like to have the Heritage Preservation ordinance adopted as soon as possible to allow Eden Prairie to join 19 other local governments which currently receive funding. Hensrud noted that this funding could be used to help complete the Cummins-Grill Homestead. The external lighting and security system had been completed, but there was still a great deal of work which remained to be done, which could not be done by volunteer labor. Hensrud stated that a lot of interest had been shown by residents in the Cummins- Grill Homestead and the Commission believed that it could become a focal point for Eden Prairie heritage. The Commission would like to see the house used partly as a museum and as a place for residents to have gatherings. Pidcock stated that the Historical Cultural Commission had done a superb job and obviously enjoyed what it was doing. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to prepare a Heritage Preservation Ordinance. Peterson supported the concept. Tenpas asked if the intent of the motion was to have Staff review the draft of the ordinance. Peterson asked if the Planning Commission would get involved in the implementation and involved in the discussions related to the Ordinance. Lambert replied City Council Minutes 4 November 14, 1989 that the Director of Planning should be involved in the discussions. Harris believed that the normal review process should be followed for the review of the Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. Peterson asked what the process involved to become a certified local government. Sandy Werts replied that an application process was necessary, but the approval of the Ordinance had to take place prior to the application. Werts added that a copy of the draft had been sent to the State. Anderson believed that the allowance of funds needed to be taken into consideration as part of the budget discussions. Harris supported the acceptance of the Historical Cultural Commission's recommendations. Peterson believed that the Council should not bond future City Councils to a commitment of $50,000 per year for the Cummins-Grill Homestead. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to receive the recommendations of the Historical Cultural Commission and to provide $50,000 for 4 years for the restoration of the Cummins-Grill Homestead. Motion carried unanimously. Pidcock believed that the foundation needed to be stabilized as soon as possible. Anderson asked if the City Building Inspections Staff had seen the Cummins-Grill Homestead. Anderson recommended j that Staff make recommendations to the Commission and the City Council as to what needed to be accomplished immediately. Anderson said that he did not want to see anything happen to the structure. Peterson asked if there was anything else besides the foundation which would be needed to stabilize the building. Hensrud replied that the ice box needed to be replaced this year. Werts added that the tuck pointing needed to be addressed this year. Hensrud noted that funding might be available to accomplish the tuck point work this year. Hensrud stated that the Commission would like to have the kitchen work done this year, but this needed to be coordinated with the electrical work. City Council Minutes 5 November 14, 1989 Anderson asked if money had originally been spent to upgrade the electrical and plumbing. Lambert replied that the electrical work had been completed on the 1st floor only and all of the plumbing work was left to be completed. Peterson asked who the Commission talked with at the schools. Barker replied that the Commission members talked with Staff and teachers. Peterson asked for further details on how the Commission planned to reorganize into two separate subcommittees. McCluskey replied that at the planning level the functions would remain the same. He added that all discussion would be at the Commission level for both the historical and cultural committees. The intent of the separation was to push the operational work to a lower level. McCluskey believed that the separation would encourage the involvement of more residents; the Commission members would become recruiters. McCluskey further believed that nothing would be lost between the historical and cultural aspects of the Commission. Peterson asked if there was any action required on the part of the City Council to allow the reorganization. Jullie replied that Council action was not necessary; however, Staff would need to be informed if more requirements from Staff would be needed. Lambert replied that additional funds and Staff time would not be needed; it was simply a request for direction from the Council as to whether a separation should take place. Hensrud thanked Lambert for all of his participation on the issues. He added that a great deal of effort to get the Historical Society and the Historical Cultural Commission working together. Pidcock asked if anything had been done to preserve the Indian grave sites. Hensrud replied that the Heritage Preservation Ordinance would make a significant difference on the preservation of the grave sites. He added that an inventory had been done and seven mounds had been identified in Eden Prairie. Lambert stated that there were 15 to 20 grave mounds originally; however, many had been destroyed. Anderson believed that the sites should be clearly marked, identified, and protected. Barker asked the Council what it expected of the Commission for the 1990's. Pidcock asked if the Commission ever anticipated charging admission to go through the Cummins-Grill Homestead. Hensrud replied that a charge was under consideration for the future, after further restoration had taken place. ji �� City Council Minutes 6 November 14, 1989 Barker added that it was more likely that a charge would be made for using the facility for meeting purposes. Peterson was impressed with the proactive attitude of the Commission and the foresight in planning for tomorrow. Peterson believed that if it were not for the Historical and Cultural Commission, a part of the City would be lost. He added that the Commission was an important part of the quality of life in Eden Prairie. Anderson understood how difficult it was to find funds for the restoration outside the City budget; however, he believed that an effort should be made to acquire funds elsewhere when possible. Anderson believed that the restoration needed to take place more quickly so that what had already been done would not need to be redone before the project was complete. Pidcock recommended that Vo-Tech schools be contacted for help. Hensrud replied that the Vo-Tech schools had been contacted; however, they were concerned about competing with the private sector. Anderson asked if the peony garden was going to be tended. Werts replied that an individual had been hired to roto- till and spray the plant, but transplanting also needed to be done. Barker stated an appreciation for the City's support for the restoration of the Cummins-Grill Homestead. She added that this facility was also enjoyed by other communities. Barker stated that the Commission had a desire to become better known throughout the community. Anderson asked if the Commission had a plan for a curriculum to educate the young residents in the community of its history. Barker replied that the school had a program where long-term residents came in to speak to the classes. Werts added that the 6th grade social studies classes had a program on Eden Prairie history. Anderson believed that it was important for the history of the community to become important to the youth. Werts recommended that Historical Programmer Paul Maravelous develop special programs to take to the schools and the Cub Scout groups. Hensrud thanked the Council for the support of an additional Staff person. He added that the Commission would take the challenge to get funding from other sources than the City budget and to become a Certified Local Government. City Council Minutes 7 November 14, 1989 / IV. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS t MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 PM. Motion carried unanimously. t1 I it j�� EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1989 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, and Douglas Tenpas CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Deb Edlund PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: All members present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tenpas to approve the Agenda as published and amended. ADDITIONS: ADD Item IV.A, Format of the November 16 Special Meeting. ADD Item V, Resolution for Property Tax Levy. Motion carried unanimously. II. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock to approve Items A through B on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. III. DISCUSSION OF BUDGET Tenpas asked what size room was necessary for the computer system and if a special room was actually needed. Frane replied that the LOGIS software depended on a Hewlett Packard computer system which required a special environment. Tenpas then asked if it would be prudent to investigate the use of alternative software. Frane replied that other cities which had tried to use other software had all eventually returned to the LOGIS software. Tenpas asked what systems were used by City Council Minutes 2 November 14, 1989 Edina and Bloomington. Frane replied that Edina used LOGIS, but Bloomington and Plymouth used their own software. Peterson asked what the cost would be to hire an outside consultant to assess the City's needs. Frane replied the cost would be approximately $2,000 to $3,000 for a recommendation on hardware; however, Frane did not recommend a change in software. Peterson noted that this question seemed to come up annually. Anderson asked what the national trends were regarding computer systems for city governments. Frane replied that LOGIS was a leader in the field. Frane added that Eden Prairie shared the expense of the software with 25 other communities. PAGE 39 Tenpas asked for an estimate on the total legal expense for the BFI controversy. Jullie replied that the costs would be over $300,000 for the year. Tenpas recommended that the legal fees for the case be included in the budget if possible. Peterson stated that a decision would be made on this issue on December 5, 1989 and recommended that this discussion be continued to the December 19, 1989 special meeting. Pidcock added that she would like to know what the estimated negotiations costs for the BFI settlement would be. Tenpas noted that approximately $125,000 of the legal costs would be spent on general issues and asked what the additional $50,000 of the $175,000 would be used for. Jullie replied that the $50,000 was an estimated cost to cover special cases. PAGE 40 Jullie reported that the Public Information Program had not been implemented and an investment in the camera, cablecasting equipment, and communications co-ordinator had not been made at this time. Staff had tried to conserve expenditures and believed that this issue might warrant further discussion at this time on the restructuring of this position to shifting responsibility to current employees. Peterson recommended that the discussion regarding personnel be separated from equipment. Jullie concurred. Anderson believed that this item should be discussed further to see if the City was still committed to this project. Anderson believed that at this time there were more pressing issues which needed attention first. Peterson stated that he was not eager to add additional Staff at this time. He believed that present employees should be City Council Minutes 3 November 14, 1989 allowed to set aside time to handle public information • services. Tenpas believed that it would be beneficial to cablecast the City Council meetings to help keep the residents informed; however, he concurred that the money was needed in other areas. Harris preferred to redistribute the expenses for several of the program requests to other higher priority items. Pidcock asked if Rogers Cable Company could help out in this area. Jullie replied that the equipment was available for special events only. Pidcock asked if the equipment could be reserved for one meeting a month. Jullie believed that Rogers Cable would be reluctant; however, this could be looked into. Anderson stated that Eden Prairie did not have the communication facilities that the neighboring communities had available. PAGE 41 Jullie reported that workman compensation had been a problem and resulted in the request for an increase in the budget. Jullie added that a new safety program was being implemented and better research into accidents and how they could be prevented was underway. Peterson asked why Item 4310, Back to Work-Unemployment Costs, had been added. Human Resources and Services Director Natalie Swaggert replied that last year this expense was listed under a different category. Pidcock asked where the funding was provided for severance pay. Jullie replied that if an employee left in good standing, severance pay benefits came from a portion of unused sick leave and vacation accrual. Pidcock asked if this was not covered under the salary budget. Jullie replied that severance was separate from salary. Harris added that this was over and above the salary. Anderson asked if it was a common practice to pay for unused sick leave. Jullie replied yes, it was an encouragement for employees to save the sick leave time and not abuse it. Swaggers added that up to 800 hours could be accumulated. , This was a common practice among cities. She noted that the Eden Prairie plan was very conservative. PAGE 43 Jullie reported that the reserve fund held the funding for Staff salary adjustments and an amount of $100,000 for 4'' City Council Minutes 4 November 14, 1989 contingencies. This is separate from the General Fund Surplus which was $1,700,000 at the end of 1988. CERTIFICATES Peterson asked if there was a regular rotation for the replacement of vehicles. Police Chief Wall replied that the rotation of a vehicle took place somewhere between 50,000 and 70,000 miles. He added that the public works department kept the police department informed when a vehicle started to have high repair charges. Anderson asked how long it would take to accumulate 50,000 miles on a police car. Wall replied approximately 1 year. Harris asked how many cars were in the current police fleet. Wall replied 20 cars. Tenpas asked for clarification on "identi-kit" software. Wall replied that this was a software program which speeds up the process of identification of a suspect and lessens the stress on the witness because of the reduced amount of time necessary. Peterson asked for clarification on refurbishing versus new fire engines. Fire Chief Johnson replied that the two vehicles in question were over 12 years old. These engines differed significantly from the engines used today and had much less power. Johnson added that these engines were not designed for today's drivers. The older vehicles only enclosed the captain and the driver and were not appropriate for northern climate conditions. Johnson stated that an engine which was refurbished would provided possibly another 6 to 10 years of use; a new vehicle would provide 20 years of use with one refurbishing of the pump unit. Peterson asked what the risk factor was to be without one unit. Johnson replied that currently the Fire Department protected approximately 36 miles of property with 3 stations. The City was subject to risk when there were multiple alarms. A 20 minute time span would elapse before help from a neighboring community could arrive. The refurbishing would remove an engine from service entirely. Peterson asked how long it would take to refurbish an engine. Johnson replied anywhere from 4 months to 1 year. Anderson asked if it would be possible to compromise and refurbish one engine and replace the other. Johnson replied that the technology in the fire apparatus had changed significantly over the last few years and, therefore, the resale value was no longer present. Johnson stated that there was an ongoing maintenance program with the public works department and a refurbishing program needed to be based on hours of use on the pump and not on miles on the vehicle. Anderson recommended a 5-to 10-year program for refurbishment ity :� j City Council Minutes 5 November 14, 1989 ( and replacement of the engines. He believed that this would allow the City to better anticipate the expense. Johnson noted that the second engine would not be delivered until late in 1991 or early 1992. Tenpas believed that because this was a volunteer department, it was important to provide state-of-the-art equipment. Jullie reported that he and Chief Johnson had had further discussions on the need for a new computer system and there was still a possibility that this item would be added back into the budget before the final discussions were completed. Harris asked what the computer system would be for. Johnson replied that the paperwork was extremely heavy for the Fire Department. The department was required to keep statistics and would be required in March to keep additional information on hazardous waste materials storage and transport. The Eden Prairie Fire Department needed to be able to tie into the State Fire Marshal's office, which would require an IBM computer. Johnson added that the Fire Department was computer-illiterate at this time. Harris then asked how the City would provide this information if a new computer were not purchased. Jullie replied that Staff would have to try to work with equipment that was currently available. Johnson reported that the City's Inspection Department would be responsible to gather the information, but the retrieval of the information would be the responsibility of the Fire Department. Johnson added that it was vital that this information be available instantaneously. Johnson also noted that the fire training was becoming computer oriented. Marty Siegel, a real estate agent with Edina Realty, stated that he was proud to be able to sell Eden Prairie to those interested in moving here. Siegel noted that the building fees did not reach the expected levels. He believed that in order to continue to attract people to the area the City needed an advantage over neighboring communities. Siegel believed that a possible advantage would be to reduce the costs of operating the City and in turn be able to reduce taxes. Siegel questions if it would be possible to contract for services rather than employ permanent Staff. Siegel stated that the City had to realize that it could not assume that growth would always be available and the tax revenues would always increase due to the growth. Jullie reported that he had had conversations with Siegel on different occasions. Jullie noted that the City had tried to keep the tax rates consistent. The tax levies over the last several years had remained stable and the City had been able to provide excellent services to residents. The City had looked into hiring private sector firms for certain positions and had compared costs. The street construction and sewer installation projects were all contracted. Staff only did City Council Minutes 6 November 14, 1989 street patching and overlays. Staff had looked into contracting the grass cutting; however, it had been determined that there was enough work to keep the current Staff busy all year. Jullie stated that at the Community Center the capital and operating costs were not met, but this was a facility which the residents said that they wanted and provided for with a bond referendum. Jullie believed that the parks and police services provided in Eden Prairie were second to none in the metro area. Peterson believed that it was important for the Council and the residents to be reassured that the City was operating in a cost-efficient manner. Anderson stated that he would be opposed to removing the part- time jobs to cut the grass, etc. He added that those individuals that work part-time to cut the grass, etc; were the youth of the community. Anderson believed that it was important to weigh the advantages. Lambert reported that Staff had looked at contracting for certain services; however, the only area where it would be of use was the cutting of grass. The grass cutting was mainly done at the mini-parks and the cemeteries. Lambert noted that other communities had found that the contract service did cost less; however, the contracts were not flexible. The cost for any changes in the contract made them more costly. Lambert added that there was only a 6-month period when more staff was employed and these positions were only part-time. Harris believed that Siegel was suggesting that the City needed to keep looking at costs. Harris believed that the City Council was continually testing the budget. Greg Josefchuk,15290 Village Woods Drive, stated that he was concerned about deleting of the request for cablecasting. He believed that this was an important service and that the residents needed to be educated and informed about what was happening in Eden Prairie. Josefchuk believed that many residents would prefer to have cablecasting of City Council meetings rather than learning about what was happening through the newspaper. Josefchuk questioned how many officers were used to enforce the animal leash law. Wall replied that one full-time and two part-time employees were responsible to respond to animal control matters. Josefchuk believed that the budget could be better spent. Tenpas replied that animal control was more involved than just the enforcement of the leash law. Peterson stated that there were a lot of problems with animals other than dogs and believed that a good service was provided. Josefchuk questioned if 3 employees were needed to provide this service. City Council Minutes 7 November 14, 1989 Anderson stated that he had voted for cablecasting in the �• past, but when there were safety issues such as the fire engines and new police cars which were needed, these issues should come first. Anderson concurred that cablecasting was important to inform the residents, but questioned the percentage of residents which would actually watch. Anderson believed that at this time there were other areas which needed the finances and it was the Council's responsibility to set priorities. Pidcock noted that only 50% of the residents have cable at this time. Josefchuk stated that he appreciated Councilmember Anderson's concerns. He recommended that either Rogers Cable or the schools be contacted about possible use of equipment to make the cablecasts. Josefchuk believed that this issue warranted further investigation. Peterson believed that this issue should be presented as part of the community survey which was being planned. Siegel stated that he believed that the City Staff made for a very capable organization. Siegel recommended that employees be given an incentive to help make suggestions to save money. Pidcock asked if this type of program was not already in place. Jullie replied that there were employee recognition programs and a suggestion box. Jullie noted that the new Safety Program which was being implemented was the result of suggestions from employees. CITY MANAGER Tenpas requested clarification on the internship program. Jullie replied that the colleges encouraged the students to work for cities during the summer to get experience in their field. Jullie added that this was not always utilized. Tenpas asked if the interns were actually of assistance to Staff or if this was actually a training period for the students. Swaggert replied that she was a heavy user of interns and had found them to be helpful in doing a lot of work with little time from Staff to educate them. Enger believed that interns had proven to be helpful in his department. ASSESSING Tenpas stated that Bloomington had 5 residential assessors, 3 commercial assessors and 1 chief assessor. Tenpas noted that Eden Prairie had more assessors presently on Staff than Bloomington. City Assessor Sinell replied that new construction did take longer than a re-evaluation. He added that the average price of a new home in Eden Prairie was City Council Minutes 8 November 14, 1989 approximately $250,000. Tenpas asked if the purchase price of the home was being used for valuation. Sinell replied that an assessment was done from scratch. He added that new homes had a tendency to be built on a cost-plus basis. Tenpas asked what the impact would be if the Staff was reduced by one full-time person and utilized part-time help when needed. Sinell replied that the Assessing Department had not used part-time help for a long time because he had found that part-time employees did not have as much commitment as full- time staff. Sinell noted that approximately 25 percent or more of the valuations were for new construction. He added that additions also had to be assessed and remained consistent with last year's requirements. Tenpas asked what Bloomington was doing differently. Sinell said that Eden Prairie had many executive homes, which where in a higher tax bracket, that were time-consuming to assess. He noted that few homes in Eden Prairie were valued at under $150,000. Sinell added that Eden Prairie had more questions and more appeals from homeowners because of the higher-priced homes. Sinell noted that apartment appraisals averaged approximately 10 hours each. Sinell stated that he directed his assessors to maintain a set volume of assessments but to also be concerned with the quality and accuracy of the assessment. BUILDING INSPECTIONS Pidcock asked for clarification on why 6 inspectors were necessary. Director Kevin Schmieg replied that the inspectors' responsibilities were broken down into plumbing, mechanical, building, and commercial inspectors. The City was 1, divided into a northern section and a southern portion for the plumbing and building inspections. Anderson believe that because the number of building permits had decreased the number of inspections should also have decreased. Anderson asked if as many inspectors were necessary due do this decrease. Schmieg replied that 6 inspectors were necessary. He added that the City covered an area of 36 square miles and inspections were scheduled every half hour. Twelve inspections were scheduled per day; this only allowed for 11 minutes of travel time and 19 minutes per inspection. Anderson then asked if there would ever be a point where the number of inspections would drop enough to allow for the reduction of an inspector. Schmieg replied that the trend in other cities was that building inspectors were replaced by housing inspectors as housing stock get older. Schmieg stated that Staff wanted to establish a housing code and personnel would be retrained. Schmieg added that building inspectors would also be cross-trained to do fire inspections during the slower winter season. I7K G City Council Minutes 9 November 14, 1989 Peterson asked if the City was mandated to perform deck inspections. Schmieg replied that the deck inspections were not mandated but were due the increase in injuries related to decks, mainly on decks constructed prior to 1984 when untreated wood was used. Peterson then asked if the inspections would be done randomly. Schmieg replied that Staff would first inform residents of the concern regarding possible injuries from the decks. He noted that these inspections were lengthy because of all the questions asked by the residents. Schmieg stated that this was a problem of which residents were not aware. Tenpas asked if it was a common procedure to have a final inspection done by one inspector and then the follow-up inspection done by another inspector, who would find additional items which needed to be completed. Schmieg replied that typically the inspections were done by the same inspector. Tenpas asked if it was necessary to budget $4,000 for training when only $502 had been spent for last year. Schmieg replied that not all the money was set aside for training. The safety program was being set up to make the employees aware of safety issues. The majority of work related injuries were back related and films would be purchased for employees to view to try to reduce the number of these injuries. Other issues would be addressed through films and printed literature. Schmieg added that $4,200 was allocated to purchase safety equipment for flammable equipment cabinets at the community center. PARKS & RECREATION Tenpas asked if fees for the park programs could be raised to help offset costs. Lambert replied that if the fees were 1 raised it would impact the number of participants. The fees could be increased for the adult softball and maintenance costs could be added for the adult programs. Fees were now being charged for the afternoon playground programs to cover the cost of teeshirts being provided. Tenpas then asked how much fees are raised each year. Lambert replied that the fee 1 increase depended on the program. There was no set policy on which to base fees at this time; it was subjective. Anderson was concerned that the City obtained money for park development but didn't have the money to develop trails which were needed on County Road 4 and County Road 1. Anderson believed that trails were a safety issue. Anderson questioned if the City should be providing money for trails from fees from new housing. Anderson believed that part of park development should include trails. Lambert replied that this . had been brought up a year ago. He added that other communities had special trail fees. Trails were actually part of the transportation system. Lambert noted that the 1990 ;�; it City Council Minutes 10 November 14, 1989 Cash Park Fees would be discussed at the next regular City Council meeting. City Attorney Pauly had stated that there was presently no clear means to provide funds for trails; however, a portion of the park fee could be specifically allocated for trails. Lambert stated that a formula was in the process of being developed to rate and prioritize the uncompleted trails for completion which should be available within two or three weeks. Tenpas believed that it was critical to provide funds in the budget for the top priority projects. Anderson asked whether the trails should be addressed as part of the Public Works budget if trails did not belong as part of the Parks & Recreation budget. Anderson believed that trails were a safety issue and not a transportation issue. Lambert said he always consulted the Engineering Department to determine the costs of a trail and technically if a trail could be constructed as planned. Anderson asked if the trails along County Road 4 and County Road 1 were to be considered safety issues or Park & Recreation issues. Tenpas concurred that the trails on County Road 4 and County Road 1 were safety issues. Lambert reported that to-date the Spoon Ridge trail was the ( number one priority. • HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL COMMISSION +� Harris recommended that the Commission find matching funds. fi Tenpas concurred that there was a need to find funds outside the City budget. Tenpas was concerned about allocating more money at this time. Peterson stated that the Historical & Cultural Commission had become more active and was committed to the preservation of the facilities based on a commitment from previous City Councils for funding. Peterson believed that it was important to maintain that commitment and recommended a $20,000 commitment at this time with another $10,000 if the Commission could obtain matching funds. Harris concurred with Mayor Peterson. Anderson stated that the repair of the foundation for the Cummins-Grill Homestead was a critical issue to maintain the building. Peterson recommended a $20,000 capital commitment and dollar- , for-dollar matching funds. City Council Minutes 11 November 14, 1989 Tenpas asked how much money would be left over from the 1989 budget. He noted that the entire budget had not been spent over the past two years. Harris asked if Tenpas was recommending the excess from the 1989 budget be carried over to 1990. Tenpas replied that the amount had not been spent for the last two years; he questioned if the budget was overstated again for 1990. Peterson noted a significant increase in the music and drama budget from $4,200 in 1989 to $9,100 in 1990. Lambert replied that this increase reflected the desire of Staff to provide quality programs for the new amphitheater at Staring Lake Park. Harris noted that it was important to consider that the salary for the Historical Co-Ordinator was for only half a year. A resident asked why a historical co-ordinator was needed now when the City had not had one in the past. Peterson replied that the City wanted to encourage classes at the Cummins-Grill Homestead. He added that it had been a long process to make the facility appropriate for public use. The resident asked what type of attendance the facility had. Lambert replied that approximately 1500 people had participated in Historical and Interpretation programs at the site. The resident asked what the projection was for 1990. Lambert replied that a projection had not been made. The resident asked if the 1500 people in attendance were Eden Prairie residents. Lambert replied yes. HUMAN RESOURCES Peterson asked why the significant increase for physical exams and tests. Swaggert replied that this was related to hiring for the Police Department. The testing was selection testing to reduce the number of candidates. Anderson asked where the City was going with Stratenir Planning. Swaggert replied this was up to the Council. Three �. meeting were scheduled for next year. Siegel asked what type of turnover the City had for personnel services. Natalie replied a low turnover. Siegel asked why the advertising budget was $9,000 if the turnover was low. Swaggert replied that the advertising was for seasonal and part-time positions. Siegel asked if other methods had been considered for gaining applicants for these positions. Pidcock asked if the City was experiencing more difficulty in s, recruiting youth for part-time positions. Swaggert replied that the turnover was tremendous. 7 ( 4I_��l City Council Minutes 12 November 14, 1989 PLANNING DEPARTMENT k Tenpas commended Director Chris Enger for low increases in the budget over the last three years, especially with the increase in development in the City over that time period. CIVIL DEFENSE 1 Tenpas asked if the siren had been installed. Chief Wall replied that the siren had been installed today. I i FIRE Jullie reported that Staff would update the Council after it had re-examined the priorities related to a computer system. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING Tenpas commended Director of Public Works Dietz for his low increase in the budget. PUBLIC WORKS/STREET MAINTENANCE ! Anderson asked if the trails were going to be considered as part of the transportation budget. 4 Peterson believed that the trails should be left in the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources budget. He questioned how Staff would determine if a trail was considered a recreational trail or a transportation trail for safety reasons. i Anderson believed this to be a philosophical issue. Anderson { was concerned because the trails had not been constructed due to lack of funds and priority. Residents had different connotations when talking about trails for recreation and trails for safety. Tenpas believed that it was important to allocate and reserve funds for the trails. He further believed that a specific j line item should be established in the budget. 1 GENERAL DISCUSSION 1 Tenpas asked if the City could change from cash accounting to an accrual accounting system. Frane replied that the City would change to an accrual system starting in January 1990. Tenpas noted that after talking with other cities he was more comfortable with Eden Prairie's mileage reimbursement program. •t Tenpas requested a listing of raw land owned by the City, the value of the property, and noted if it was designated for park land. I v City Council Minutes 13 November 14, 1989 Tenpas asked what type of analysis was used to determine if it would be prudent to pay off Bonds totalling $41,000,000. Frane replied that there was a possibility of refinancing the bonds. Tenpas asked the interest rate on the bonds currently. Frane replied the interest rates varied from 10% to 4.5%. Tenpas asked how many of the bonds were pre-1978. Frane replied that the majority of the bonds were post-1978. Tenpas encouraged Staff to contact traders. Pidcock asked if some of the TIF bonds would be paid off in 1991. Frane replied that Staff recommended that some of the bonds be called next year. Tenpas asked if monthly budget reports would be available with the accrual method. Frane replied yes. Tenpas stated that he would like monthly breakdowns. Pidcock noted that the Council had requested monthly figures several times. Jullie replied that Staff had not had a monthly capability in the past. Tenpas believed that it would be helpful to be aware of some problems earlier in the year so that something could be done. Tenpas recommended consideration of an outside consultant to determine if some departments could be merged. Pidcock stated that this had been talked about previously. Tenpas asked what the balance would be at the end of the year for the General Fund. Jullie replied approximately $1,700,000 assuming that the cable settlement was transferred. Tenpas recommended that the increase in the budget should be approximately 5% and not 10%. Tenpas recommended $600,000 to be dedicated to land acquisition and $250,000 dedicated for I safety issues. Tenpas believed that it was important to know . on a monthly basis what was available in the General Fund balance. Peterson stated that he did not see a long-term benefit in cutting the General Fund balance. Tenpas believed that it was important to encourage the department heads to come in under budget. Tenpas did not . think that the City would feel an impact from a 5% reduction in the budget. Tenpas believed that it was important for the department heads to furnish accurate figures. Harris was concerned about a recommendation for a severe �. reduction in the General Fund. Peterson stated that significant issues had been raised. Peterson noted that there were other factors besides inflation which affected the budget. Peterson did not believe that an City Council Minutes 14 November 14, 1989 across-the-board cut in the budget was good budgeting. He believed that it was important to allow enough time between the Public Hearing and the last meeting for Staff to make necessary adjustments and recommendations. Harris stated that the budget was a guiding policy document. Harris believed that the department heads were professionals and were giving the Council their best advice on what was necessary for them to do the proper job for the City. Harris believed that it was important to hear the comments at the Public Hearing before making further decisions. IV. COUNCILMEMBERS REPORT A. Format of November 16 Special Meeting Jullie reported that the meeting would be held at the Pax Christi Church. The meeting would be conducted by a law judge and the Council's position was only to observe. The Council should not take the time to respond to comments and should only listen. Jullie said that security officers would be on the premises. A court reporter would transcribe the meeting. Pidcock asked if the City Attorney would be allowed to make a presentation. Jullie replied that the meeting { would open with a short presentation by the City Attorney and that handouts would be provided. Pidcock asked if the public would be allowed to make comments. Jullie replied yes. Pidcock asked if the same format would be used at the second meeting. Jullie replied that at the second meeting staff and BFI would both present reports. Peterson believed that it was important for the public to be informed of the facts. Pidcock believed that both meeting should be exactly the same. Harris concurred. Harris believed that any Staff report should be presented at the December 5, 1989 City Council meeting. Tenpas asked what the Council should do if questions were directed to them. Jullie replied that it may be necessary to answer some questions. Peterson believed that it was important not to get into a debate mode. Anderson stated that a major issue is the air stripper. He added that the PCA would not be in attendance. Anderson believed that the PCA should be protecting the City and was displeased that it would not be at the meeting. City Council Minutes 15 November 14, 1989. V. RESOLUTION FOR PROPERTY TAX LEVY MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to adopt Resolution No. 89- 250. Motion carried unanimously. VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Tenpas moved, seconded by Pidcock to adjourn the meeting at 11:35 PM. Motion carried unanimously. "4 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST August 21, 1990 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) GAS FITTER Kohlenberger Construction Co. Wencl Service Company MECHANICAL GAMES CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAM•tILY) Chi Chi's Mexican Restaurante Michael Curtice Construction PEDDLER Mayfield Builders, Inc. Petra Construction Freeman James Haves (firewood) CLASS A GAMBLING (renewal) HEATING & VENTILATING Acrogymnastics Sports Education Assoc. Alpine Heating & Cooling, Inc. at the Eden Prairie Legion • Air Mechanical, Inc. A-Aarons Plumbing Brian's Heating & Air Conditioning John A. Dalsin & Son, Inc. Custom Refrigeration,Inc. Preferred Sheet Metal These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. cji Pat Solie Licensing /fn • { International School Phase II t t CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10-87, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That Ordinance No. 10-87 be amended by adding the following: "Section 2. That the plans dated April 13, 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 21, 1990, for the International School Phase II portion of the development, shall also apply." "Further, said land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement for the property, dated April 30, 1987, between the City of Eden Prairie and the International School of Minnesota, Inc., and that certain Supplement to Developer's Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and the International School of Minnesota, Inc., dated August 21, 1990." Section 3. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on February 6, 1990, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk ( PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of /117 EXHIBIT A International School - Phase II •tl C C C V V V /. VV ••w V J V 0 V 0 n 0 n 1. V M N 0 E M..o00.•�••• J q O C O O 0 eel O°C°.oJ � Otl �C.]Cp w A 000 is WONU.G 0 } 0 w 0 0 4 Sr J v w 0.I 0 J J 3 S J i.wl.Zw n 0 0 S ' 0 0 V 'o 7 00• V.6 O J 0 .0 O w o / V 4- E 8. C O M n 4 4 1.0 4.. O m tl O J m 0 0..V Coo Q a 0 0 0 0 n o 0 O 0 o..E.auwm.''.� • O 0 . CO, ..- �oo.lii 0vv LctD 0 L y LGqGp W 0 tl 9C M 000EC40 00 & 3A ov0 0�f000 0 0 .]p oV yy n • nn • 000VJwI JZ .. U n�l 8. O .. CM 0 0 0 0 0 n 0V • nn y 0 y 0 ). o 0.00 S $ • Y V•.v.0{d M H j C..1VVV 4.00 pfi L o O u.+ N o 0 N L E_ o 0 • ..0 0.n 0 0 0 0 J 0 S 0 Np t �41 y 0 w V 0 J 0 J000M 0Z i0.. 0O 0ZLooJZLP1 VO•VM.0 y J CCo A•.00 C.�i 3. Jx J'✓ C.�ri0 'S.0nCS4yE 0 U 4 4a C M >0 q 0 1 C n9.. 0 d .O+ ,. O.i to4"1 � OOJ4 pw4w 0EOwO}} (py� yy Jpp p Ow ON L0.0 f70 p. VV 0 0 0 v 0 0 t 14 O 4 L 4+ 0 4 41 J7 V J 0 ~ p C V 0 0 4 yO C07 O V V Y y ny V n 7pQ 0 J n L 00 J.V..W .0o m% {I. at V •x 81J. U V woONOCT" " O tl O.]tl,ya,1 Ly / E V J 0 n 0 M 0 0 0 •..L V .C. • •w tlO..JMVJ 0� CV3 tl� V�V~� n C.n.00.+ p «a N 0 v C pyp0 0 4.0. J 0 C....** 0 w d yy0•OyJ'.•. 0 0 7 J•o p O V Oaf) C C n 0 0 4 S {! Y a0.O O 4 p O , o 1 n Q y Vp •1 0 a v % tl y O N o•) O p.0 O.• V tl O C tl W F•••• L�.r l'J..10L 0 C f+ZN�161Zn ZN✓Z..0W V O q V 0 N 3-' 41 0 C ll..w1p0p 1 •V M J 3 0 20 3 1.J O ^ 7 O O V• 0 .1 •�1�++•J~ ... V C o 0 OI V✓O V•O n✓J V C W V J V/ V1••J N n V O n D w CU E••L L tl06 V L..L.00 0 nOD.. V n nJ LL CU n.. V0✓ n0 V VOVOO • o V J N O W w O 0 J 0.J J 0 V O tl V 6 ' ..C • C C V tl V C .C J M N.]0 V) Z V O a 0 tt 7 3.n O n 4 o 3 o V U O W n M.. n y W n M u 0 0 J •L N CC 0 0'J•Z w C ..1 n L m J V OC L V w C C i V C U w V V L 03 V N C 9 g cg J O S 0 L 0 0 w 0 0 0. y n.1 tp ✓ O Y J% O C U J J C.1 n J V✓•. C V.. 30 L.J4 1. 0 V0� 0'OL. 07VLMW yB n0'4.. 7 V0V 4V0 L •C..n y J 0> M Z O VVJI y O w 0 C N O 4 Z C..0 0 0 V C 0f 0 C J 4 q 1 J On O • 0 Z w 0 0 0 4 n •V� Z 0...•1. 2 Y N C V..N O •• n v V •8. V •. 800 •N J O �D 8 • U 0•+J VO V V 00•�t J 8. 0 07 LN..VVJ J V.O MN CVO . V V3: VZ Z E F 0 40 Qv t •N M C C n 0 V OC •N;• O Y C O n A V n J . 03 4 •01 • .. O Z 0.. Y 0 w Y O L J l.. K n.. n..✓ 0 r1 0 v L n V V O J U L W 0 O.0..J O J✓ 3 J ..n v..N J .00W0 .0 00 Vei .u0 V J S v v V U. •n C O n 0 44 0 v 40 •0 V 04 N n 4.p 0300 J 0 Oh.. 114.... 1. 0 Y) 00 J n0wwOZ W•+VYI 3Eny Vo.40C 004.0..5 40 .00 II J.. O1 wn4v40 0.. .1...•.NOJ.0.. V an VZ • V.. J .. 0.•.... M 7000d o n.+i 6Nn0..00 m � 8. 0..0 nJ0 U..S 4 .r OOLU 0.. M..1 0 >A ..2 tO v V3.00 V V w 600 0 Y F w y M S•4.r V V T n .' V 4.00 J J ►. V 3 4 U O V U • 4 0 3 3 V n 3 0 V 7 0 04: 10 4 w V 0 0 0 VC J r.3. 0 L •o O S u 0 V 0 C 0 0 J t L •4.. Y CO / 0l0 0 0 M 0 N 0 .•UC CV O4J 00 JN000 0 4'J..V V 0~ZN COO VOW Ow L3 •0 Z 0.. 4w lv 4 4 n 0L J n 0 0L J n v mOt 0 LOL11u A OE n.. OE J 0oZ 000 CJY v OJnrv • .+w v V 46 J 4.. Z O •O Y J C 40 7 1. Z o v w.. L o 0 10,00 y 0 V V V Oi V • : MOO .,CM V.•J.O8. ..LOI 000 1.006U01 0 E OJM OLZ 0 tw .V.J C.. .4.. 4 V J 0 L J .0J.. V p U...+O N 44 i 0 0 J J E V M M C C.V. J V C V V N J •A.V 00 VIZ 0 O. 0 V 3. .. avow vW 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 ✓J O n M V 0..V L J 0 4 n..I J C E 8 1.00 n N.. 0 p ... 0 0 0 n N n C.•1.+w V 7 n V O w V./ J n ••1 V 0 O J w p 0 3 C U O M v • 0 V C V Z C + V .+Z /X L 4N .. VC ww 0 V n ONV V,.. .......00 wV/ 1. 00 n Z 06 v w 0 J • C O 0 0 D w J 0 0 01 C J•4 4 00 V 0000011 • C / 3. 000 0.0 n V es 0.. 0 7 L 7 J 0 1. 0 0...60 C Y V • v v L J n yy 77 Y Jo O w E 0 J J M J 4 0 J L C V V1 V 0 V w J M O J V W V O V O V C O n J O V Op L,]�OiJ OJwOVN w LVOVMw M J VW n4OC CC 4.] 4 0 0 V C N V 0 q�t n n V 0 V L.p E N n Z 0 C /S 0 Y...C.4 O•.Ci 0 01 L N V06. 0 4J7 4 0 ni C4O: 0 01+ V 0 6 0 D V n Y O.M n 3 V M OVI O N J J. 0Z U 0 ON",0 0. 0 J 0 0.0 L 8. COO . o Z .0 t0 V X • Y L V tl v C J .. 4 V Y L 1 CC. 8 • V J C 0 J✓N.. • C JV {V1� nl •.J V O.•1 n O3V /J 0✓ UJ.. 0)0 J 0 J U.•10 O n 0 V J J C M A 0J 0 J J n n 0040 0 l C n 7 Z 0 0 0..n ll n 7 0 = v C..O n n C • 0 O C W 4 y u V V C •N J 4 0 .0 0 -. 0 .0 J V J 0 J'UW V 40 5• Z CO J 0 0 V01 J V W.. V ♦.t....).....0 ✓ 0 U 3.J w 1- V U J n p n w O 0.4 4 n O V n V V Z 0. 7 0.0 01 C 0 0 0 1. N % 4 Cr V V •.. V 0 V 4 0,0 0 7 0 M 0 V • V Y 0 n n C 0 J.. n.. MO 00 0 * 0 . Cr • J 3 i.3 3 0 0 Y J...V C Y 0. 0 3 8 Y 8 3 C V V Y 40 0.. V C • V J w> 0. L w0 Mn n g L J 0L •J J 4 0 8 0 1.✓ O L JC L.L O C J V C 8L J•J✓wC CSvvq+. 7V MM0 CC < r YM7. y00VMV CO O VO✓ OC1wi Vny00V4'0V J 4N % •J0UJ JJ. W%2 °w0VyawVVv^~a4C WZOVvZJJ- nZ Y 0 W 0 0 C V S V 71 W M 4 V 0 0~ i 1 International School Phase II SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of 1990, by THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA, INC., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WHEREAS, Developer and City made and entered into a Developer's Agreement, dated April 30, 1987, for the International School of Minnesota, (hereinafter the "Developer's Agreement"); and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Developer's Agreement for the portion of the property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #4-90, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said property as follows: 1. The Developer's Agreement shall be and hereby is supplemented and amended in the following respects: A. The following paragraphs shall be amended to read as follows: "1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated April 30, 1987,reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 17 and April 7, 1987, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. With respect to Phase II of said development, Developer shall develop the property in conformance with materials revised and dated , 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 13, 1990, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein." "16. Developer agrees that, prior to issuance of any permit for grading, or building, upon any phase beyond Phase II of the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, Developer shall submit to the City Manager and receive the City Manager's approval of all necessary 9Ip plans and materials for review of all development beyond Phase II. Said materials shall include all items identical to those required for zoning and platting procedural requirements. r'', i Upon approval by the City Manager of said submission 11, materials, said submission materials shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission for review and recommendation. Said submission materials shall subsequently be forwarded to the City Council for review and subject to its approval." B. The following paragraphs #18 through #22 shall be added: "18. Developer agrees to confine grading to Phase II of the property. Grading for Phase II shall take place within the construction limits as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer shall install snow fencing at the construction limits within the wooded areas of the property and shall implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved on the property prior to any grading." "19. Developer has submitted, and City has approved the plans for purposes of screening exterior mechanical equipment screening for Phase II of the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, the above plans, as approved by the City, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C of the Developer's Agreement. Developer has provided to City a security in the amount of 150% of the cost of the implementation of said exterior mechanical equipment screening. If, after completion of implementation of said mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by City, in its sole discretion, that the proposed screening does not meet the intent of the City Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from the public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then City shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to revise the mechanical equipment screening to meet Code requirements. Developer further acknowledges that City will not release the security provided until any such corrective measures are satisfactorily completed by Developer." "20. Developer has submitted plans for the purposes of landscaping and screening for the property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. In particular, such landscaping and screening plans include details for screening automobile headlights along the western edge of the entry drive in order to achieve 75% opacity throughout the year. Developer has provided a security to City totalling 150% of the cost of implementation of plans for such landscaping and screening, including screening of automobile headlights along the western edge of the entry drive. In addition to other requirements of City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subd. G., Developer agrees to the following: If, after implementation by Developer of said landscaping and screening, it is determined by City pursuant to valid methodology and objective standards, that the screening implemented by Developer does not achieve 75% opacity throughout the year for screening of automobile headlights along the western edge of the entry drive, then City shall notify the Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to revise such screening in order to meet 75% opacity in such location. Developer further acknowledges that City will not release the security provided by Developer until such corrective measures are satisfactorily completed by the Developer. Developer agrees to maintain said screening through annual fertilization, shearing, and watering. Any plants that become distressed, or die, shall be replaced with substantially similar plant materials by Developer at Developer's own expense." "21. Prior to issuance by City of any occupancy permit for the property, Developer shall have completed construction and implementation of the stucco finish on the east gymnasium wall on the property. Said stucco finish shall be of a color to match the building." "22. Developer acknowledges that a violation of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement will cause immediate and irreparable harm to the City. Developer specifically acknowledges that City may seek to enforce 1 the terms and conditions of item #20, above, by temporary restraining order, temporary injunction, and injunction, as well as by all other remedies allowed to the City by law. In addition, Developer agrees to pay all cost and expenses, including attorney's fees, which are incurred by the City in enforcing the terms and conditions of item #20, above." 2. Developer agrees to all the terms and conditions and accepts the obligations of "Developer" under the Developer's Agreement, as amended and supplemented herein. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-205 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE #4-90 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance #4-90 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of August, 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance #4-90, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. • D. That Ordinance #4-90 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City Clerk k CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4-90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land located north of Bryant Lake, south of Highway #62, within the Public District, District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement and supplement to such developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of , 1990. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) /7 ()' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-211 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA FOR PHASE II WHEREAS, the International School of Minnesota, Inc., has applied for site plan approval of Phase II of the school, on property located north of Bryant Lake, south of Highway #62, with zoning in the Public District to be amended by Ordinance #4-90, adopted by the City Council on August 21, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public I. hearing at its December 11, 1990 Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its February 6, 1990 meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to the International School of Minnesota, Inc., for Phase II of the school, based on plans dated April 13, 1990, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's r lgreement between International School of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota zorporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated April 30, 1987, and that • certain Supplement to Developer's Agreement dated August 21, 1990, for said VI school. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architec DATE: August 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 90-190 - Trail Construction on MnDot Property The City would like to complete the section of trail along Purgatory Creek, east of Mitchell Road and south of Valley View Road. A portion of this trail section was graded with base rock added as part of Edenvale Corporate Park Addition in 1985. The City tried to obtain an easement for the westerly portion of the trail connecting to Mitchell Road from C. H. Robinson Company last year. After the bond referendum failed, lack of funds delayed the project. Staff will be contacting the new owners of the property to obtain a trail easement in the next several weeks. The easterly section of the trial will run along the north side of Purgatory Creek and connect to the new trail along Highway 5. Most of the construction will occur in the Minnesota Department of Transportation right-of-way, and a permit has been applied for. In order to complete the permit process, the Minnesota Department of Transportation needs a resolution from the City Council confirming that the City intends to construct an 8' bituminous trail conforming to the Minnesota Department of Transportation regulations as stated in the permit. BPC:mdd memobarb/10 L i/R(fi CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-190 RESOLUTION REQUESTING TRAIL CONSTRUCTION ON MnDOT PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has developed an overall plan for trail construction, and WHEREAS, the City is continuing to implement plans by constructing trails according to the plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the City of Eden Prairie will construct an 8' bituminous trail conforming to the Minnesota Department of Transportation conditions stated in permit No. 5-215-89-56. ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 14th day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL '.1NIOOT 1723 r lO.'tll1 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES t'untnd �70/ bank— r • OR FOR PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS ON TRUNK HIGHWAY Section y s1//� ; ¢ • Prepared in Tripliate.Forward or deliver all copies to proper District Permit /s'�sJ9=,j` Y District/Area Maintenance Office. No. 0 No. C�_.. Q. -- Applicant City of Eden Prairie 1Tel.No. Addreea 937-2262 I 7600 Executive Drive • Party performing work Tel.No. I Nature of work City of Eden Prairie ( above Trail Construction — — Surface to be disturbed 0 Gravel 0 Concrete Is shoulder to be disturbed (check one) ❑ Bitum. X]None ( 0 Yes A No • _—_ T.H. I County I State Highway 5 Municipality Street or Ave. — a • Hennepin Eden Prairie 9..___ __. Intersecting T.H.at:(ties to land or street lines) I If parallel to T.D.give ties by station,or land Ines if rural 1 Size and kind of pipe I Depth from surface II ` None 6" --- No.and size of excavations I Method of installation or construction Grading with Bobcat } Work to start on or after I Time required to complete work Is traffic detour necessary • July 5, 1989 September 5, 1989 I p Yea [[No • • If detour is necessary,describe rerouting • I,We.the undersigned.herewith accept the terms and conditions of the regulations of the C mnnssn,ner ot Tlanslktitattoo and agree to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the Munnesula Department of Transportation. Furthermore,except for the negligent acts of the State,its agents and employees,the applicant or his agents or contractor shall assume all liability for,and save the State,its agents and employees, harmless from, any and all claims for damages, actions or causes of action arising out of the work to be done herein and the continuing usage,constructing,reconstructing,maintaining and a I l using of said utility under this application and Permit for construction. I t, . _ , Applicant's �p+ f q � . 'l_•.,��+t_•. mated June..13,..1989 Signature V s,,,......, SEE REVERSE SIDE AUTHORIZATION OF PERMIT 9j G FOR REGULATIONS IPERMIT NOT VALID UNLESS BEARING SIGNATURE AND NUMDERI Permit No...( - Ill • ti In consideraon of their agreement to comply in all respects with the regulations of the Commussionet of Transportation coveting such • operations. permission is tetchy granted for the wink to be done as descnhed in the above application. said work to he done in • accordance with special precautions required as hereby stated II is expressly understood that this pennit is conditioned upon replacement of rnnllanon of the triink highway for its nngutal or In a satisfactory Condition. It is turthet understood that this penwt is issued subject to the appyval tit local city.sdlace ur borough astir titles having punt stupersisnm nsei said street in highway and subject to the apphcat1t cur phancr with the tit •+and regulations of the Minnesota Ensuoumerilal Quality Board and an'outer aliceted governmental agencies. ' MINNE. A AJ�/AyIEN • 1 ' RTATION • N'hnr ropy r \I I6.ani < yn • --. �^ rrrecn t„I t I Dated �`�" Authorised - .. -- - - ...-- ---- - - Pink io Dlsnt.t 1rra\tainlcoon,I-min rt Awhort.ea sianatwe 1hr dim,uhcn u,ttk is somPlcicd must he repotted t,Iloin.I Ale,'\lalllt Ilan,:Tngulccr Return this portion when work is completed: (✓S ��� Permit No. ..... ` "IZ No Deposit Required Date work completed • For Deposit in Amount of$ Required and Attached Hereto. - District Cashier's Check No.. Or Certified Check No Bond No Use Only This Deposit Made by—Applicant - ... .. Or Name Address Party Doing Work .._...._.......... Name Address • r@IS PERMIT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 5_US-89-256 The applicant or its contractor shall notify Bill Warden or Robert Anderson at 593-8449, at least one week prior to starting construction so State inspection may be arranged, and for approval of all highway materials prior to their placement. The total installation shall meet MN/DOT specifications. The applicant shall provide in-house inspection at all times while working on trunk highway right of way. No material shall be desposited on the traveled roadway. The applicant shall call Minnesota Department of Transportation Electrical Services Unit, prior to digging, for location of buried electric lines. Telephone number 612-297-4426. The applicant shall furnish, install and maintain all required traffic control devices according to Appendix "B" of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices date September 1985 while performing the construction authorized by this permit. The applicant shall contact the owners of the inplace utilities and make all arrangements for their relocation or revisions as required due to the construction authorized by this permit. The location and design of the access are approved as shown on the • attached plan. This permit approves construction of 8' wide gravel path following the inplace contours. The city shall initiate and sign a limit use permit with MN/DOT for use of States right of way. All sign of pathway shall be done by the applicant according to standards set forth in the US Biking Association manual. Strip inplace slope dressing from areas to be disturbed by construction, salvage and reuse slope dressing. All sod shall be pegged. All seeded areas shall cover the disc anchored mulch material. The mulch material shall consist of grain straw, hay. cuttings of agricultural grasses, and legumes. The material shall be relatively free of seed bearing stalks of noxious grasses or weeds as defined by the rules and regulations of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. All disturbed turf areas shall be covered with a nimimum of 4 inches of slope dressing and shall either be seeded with MN/DOT Spec.3876 Type 5 seed mixture, or be sodded. The seed mixture shall be applied at the rate of 75 pounds per acre. The applicant or his contractor shall notify the permit office 593-8449 for final inspection. Fertilize all areas with commercial fertilizer analysis 10-20-20, at a rate_ of 450 pounds per acre, or equivalent. The applicant is required to preserve all existing survey monuments. If MN/DOT determines that monuments have been disturbed or destroyed during construction activities, the applicant shall accept. full responsibility for all costs incurred in the re-establishment of the monuments. • , \\ \ \ ,........ , (.. t'1, \.•-• \ . ,3:...1 \ oL . 1 ....,.. 1 I-. X ' ...,, . . er- • .. t.. \ '' •i,\ i'''"'.4\ - -- ,,, .. ‘...„ . , .. ,k1' ,, , \ -:., -- -"----\ ,....-. '• • s• . , i• ‘ 3;---- \ ' • , ),, \ a • ‘ 4* \ / , r-.D _ ........ ••... .... 1 . r• 1 U./ . 1 . •,:. . , 1--- i , . - :.•• . • t..r++ - •*.: l'S'i.1 ' \ 44 1 . •i•'.' *•"'I i .'t, ' • ___ _I . . • II . . : . I ; 1 . 1 1 i / / I • e ; Q . • i .\PI •• . w • — • 1 = • -C:5••-• / .•'' / / ‘; f;:,......„,,...3 / ; / .I, / `,'' / I w F--:,- ) .C— / /I / .I. .._„,, . ..• 1 ( .. I i ; -^ • I 7 ' i ... i . ... , , ,, -.1. 1 1 9 0(.1 ..:`,' 1 A COMMENDATION for the EDEN PRAIRIE RED GIRLS SOFTBALL TEAM WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie City Council takes great pride in recognizing outstanding achievements by residents of the community; and WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Girls Athletic Association (EPGAA) sponsors softball competition for girls of all ages; and WHEREAS, the EPGAA's top fastpitch softball team for girls 16 years of age . and under, Eden Prairie Red, finished second in the regional and state tournaments in July 199D; and WHEREAS, Eden Prairie Red qualified for the 199D American Softball Association National Fastpitch Softball Tournament held in Garland, Texas, in August 1990; and WHEREAS, Eden Prairie Red is the first team from Eden Prairie which has qualified for an ASA National Tournament; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie does hereby commend the players and coaches of EDEN PRAIRIE RED FASTPITCH SOFTBALL TEAM of the EDEN PRAIRIE GIRLS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION Tracee Carlson Amy Engebrit Jamie Gilbert Jill Holmes Theresa Jensen Cassie Johnson Lisa Romppanen Danielle Stannard Jill Stevenson Tania Voltin Angela Woessner Anne Woil Mark Woessner, Head Coach Ralph Engebrit, Assistant Coach Mary Voltin, Assistant Coach for their success at the softball tournaments and their admirable representation of Eden Prairie. Presented this 21st day of August, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor on behalf of Councilmembers Richard Anderson Jean Harris Patricia Pidcock Douglas Tenpas CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-215 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 52-166 (SUMMIT/RED OAK/MEADOWVALE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT) WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie City Council previously approved the plans and specifications for the utility and street improvements for Summit/Red Oak/Meadowvale project; WHEREAS, utility and street easements are required to construct a Summit Drive extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City Engineer and City Attorney are hereby authorized to acquire the necessary easements, by negotiation or condemnation, on the following properties: Lot 1, Block 1 Red Rock Lake 3rd Addition Parcel 21-116-22-22-0005 Parcel 21-116-22-22-0051 Parcel 21-116-22-22-0052 Parcel 21-116-22-22-0053 ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1 { CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-213 li RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 52-156 (EXTENSION OF MITCHELL ROAD) WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie City Council previously approved the plans and specifications for the extension of Mitchell Road from Boulder Pointe Road to Pioneer Trail (CSAH No. 1); WHEREAS, utility and street easements are required to construct the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City Engineer and City Attorney are hereby authorized to acquire the necessary easements, by negotiation or condemnation, on the following properties: Parcel 21-116-22-32-0003 Outlot D, Boulder Pointe ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-214 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER PROPERTY AT 11500 WEST 78TH STREET WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie City Council previously approved the Phillips 66 service station at the intersection of Flying Cloud Drive (T.H. 169) and West 78th Street; WHEREAS, a drainage and utility easement is required across the Super 8 Motel site (11500 West 78th Street) in order to extend watermain to the Phillips 66 site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City Engineer and City Attorney are hereby authorized to acquire the necessary easements, by negotiation or condemnation, on the following properties: { Parcel 14-116-22-13-0041 ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE f HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.90-212 RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF 1990 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING HEARING DATE WHEREAS,contracts have been let for the following listed improvements and the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City Property,are established as shown on the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A. 2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation,as provided by law,and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy Clerk for public inspection. 3. A hearing shall be held on the 18th day of September, 1990 in the Eden Prairie City Hail,7600 Executive Drive,at 7:30 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessments. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of the record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk a I Cl V} w 8 8 S S S o o �gSrsi o cei va ;ro � o0 oo h . a � a O N a — cn u. S © S S S >- S e, o E- s W yaM y S S S S S g mQ c cA o r � N esk N WU O a, wJ W 1/ a O. y — O T Op Jam'+ o off col o U U 4Q 38 o 0 gc ZN a ,.... o N • o o o Ea4 N 8 N $ .E a c -=6) VI Q a 8 > u R.y F" E 4-- a° a.� pp > ° EU 8 E°` N ,$ g c o .O O4 q° o g 3 C*4 rn 3 a "o V• N, 3 CO I/1 S T 3 et, p�o^ 04 N �'�Y N T W 1 Uy = Y • € � �w "' B9 "• C N U rn 5 - O d° -; rn a4 - O m ., rn a4 ., U o4 a 1 .. - N t i a v'1 wi . 2 { . � _ 8 f 00k 2 2 t ° M < k § § 0 e \ $ ( t \ A \ § \ YD - 6 0 R $ _ cn © f e in rcsi Tr — b w m ¢ a \ B § ' i co57 / \ k k k k . \ » I. 2 & ) § S 3 § J a § - #7 ® ] g \ q § R $ § } _ B } — § - 2 ! § /j § k ° ( 2 k f q % k % } es, r4i § 6 ] ) / j § I f A ] 2 k ) $ J ! ( 2Ir Oa | ! /)/ / CHANCE ORDER #1 I.C. 52-144 Bluff Road - Street and Utility Improvements TO: City of Eden Prairie Changes made for work performed in this contract: NATURE OF CHANGES: 1. Install four permanent barricades. 2. Install sump manhole. 3. Mill existing County Road 18 asphalt and add 499 feet of bituminous curb on County Road 18. 4. Add spillway on County Road 18. 5. Remove existing water main. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT COSTS: 1. Add labor and material costs $ 945.00 2. Add labor and material costs 3,468.25 3. Add labor and material costs 2,727.23 4. Add labor and material costs 1,744.59 5. Add labor costs 300.00 Total Additions $9,185.00 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED Engineer / City of Eden Prairie BY /°<1 l/<lvl.;ly` By Date 47, / / 9O Date THE ABOVECHANGES ARE ACCEPTED Contractor Date CHANGE ORDER #1 I.C. 52-152 Cedar Ridge Storm Sewer Improvements TO: City of Eden Prairie Changes made for work performed in this contract: NATURE OF CHANGES: 1. Hauling E. placing dirt along County Road 4 to fill in low area caused by deep cuts. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT COSTS: 1. Add labor and material costs $ 4,570.00 Total Additions $ 4,570.00 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED k Engineer City of Eden Prairie By • i: ! ...�;_ By Date / Date THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED Con trac for ra By - l (7 7 Date ( i l 4 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 PROJECT: Country Glen Improvements-I.C.52-171 Eden Prairie,Minnesota RCM Project No. 10043.01 TO: Nodland Construction Company,Inc. You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subjcct contract. NATURE OF CHANGE: A. Remove storm water surface drainage from Country Road onto \Vest 62nd Street right-of-way as required by Hennepin County by placing two catchbasins and storm sewer to outlet north of West 62nd Street. B. Extra time and work to place two very deep sewer services to west between manhole No.I and manhole No.2 due to planned retaining wall by the developer. C. Remove 15 trees in sidewalk construction area and haul off project. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES AND COSTS: Add the following quantities and costs to the contract: For A.above: 1. 12"RCP Cl.V Storm Sewer I33 LF $19.00 $2,527.00 2. Eden Prairie Catchbasins-Design S-5 2 EA 900.00 1,800.00 3. I2"F.E.S.w/Trash Guard,Riprap and Filter Blanket 1 EA 600.00 600.00 4. Aggregate Base Class 5(100%Crushed Quarry Rock) 16 TON 8.00 128.00 5. Bituminous Base Coarse MnDOT 2331 10.8 TON 14.00 151.20 6. Bituminous Material for Base Coarse 0.52 TON 150.00 78.00 7. Bituminous Wear Coarse MnDOT 2341 5.4 TON 15.00 81.00 8. Bituminous Material for Wear Coarse 0.3 TON 150.00 45.00 9. Extra Signing,Flagmen,Ditching and Time to Construct Through West 62nd St. 1 LS 1,244.00 1244.00 A. Total Increase $6,654.20 C {)jl) For B.above: Construct Extra Depth on Two Sewer Services 1 LS S622.00 S622.00 B. Total Increase S622.00 For C.above: . Clear and Grub Trees and Remove From Project 1 LS S835.00 S835.00 C. Total Increase S835.00 TOTAL INCREASE S8,111.20 Contract Amount Prior to this Change Order S266,822.00 Increase Resulting From this Change Order 8.111.20 Current Contract Amount Including this Change Order S274,933.20 The Above Changes are Aonrovcd RCM ASSOCIATES,INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE a By I.GL - +. By Datc The Above Changes are Accepted NODLAND CONS CTION COMPANY,INC. • Date • 7��fI (- - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor Peterson and Council Members FROM: Alan D. Gray, P.E., City Engineer THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager DATE: August 15, 1990 RE: Petition for Street and Utility Improvements Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane I.C. 52-212 On August 1, 1990, the City Engineering Division received a j. petition for utility and street improvements signed by fourteen property owners abutting Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane. A copy of the petition is attached to this memo. The petitioning properties represent 40% of the total property frontage abutting Cedar Ridge Road and Corral Lane. The Engineering Division recommends ordering a feasibility study in accordance with the attached resolution. ADG:ssa Attachment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (r HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-208 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 52-212 (Local Improvements for Cedar Ridge & Corral Lane) and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of H.T.P.O., and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1L1 i� CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described improvements(s): (General Location) ✓ Sanitary Sewer CEDAR. RIO64- ROAD AND coRRAL LANE ✓ Watermain Storm Sewer Street Paving ,e Other Street Address or Other Legal Description of Names of Petitioners Property to be Served (Must Be Property Owners) /S7a/ CePA IT. RI 0G-F/�2O1 74 74 w. r , 1�to/,/ c r 1580/ eth�)5-62,e Kilt e . .46,44- 157(2 CenA-a Q,,DUr Ro > — R,,#e ,/ / eb c. C t06 c L aAp � �...� �. /577c, Ceci, R..j7e hC.14. j•2.--t/. /S 7q cf 7yv wg I/1/x" PciYv r,/ t. Z « C4...r /5 76 9 ez.ko-, " 5', 6-0 / G d l ,, � . .7(). n-fu... (For City Use) Date Received .3- 1-(-10 Project No. Council Consideration CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT To The Eden Prairie City Council: The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council to consider making the following described improvements(s): (General Location) 1/ Sanitary Sewer c 'A2 ( C c-( AOA A'() (.01zRiL CR'JE Watermain '"--- Storm Sewer Street Paving Other • Street Address or Other Legal Description of Names of Petitioners Property to be Served (Must Be Property Owners) )5 ,/ QA a.P , . Q, 22a�C 5 7 G - l',"44___ L itil /:7 ( t_ j:1 �� �,C L, (For City Use) Date Received Project No. Council Consideration '4),Ii Guille Addition CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #24-89 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of August 21, 1990, entered into between David and Linda Guille, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 18th day of July, 1989, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of August, 1990. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of EXHIBIT A Legal Description Commencing at a point in the West line of Government Lot 5, Section 22, Township 116, Range 22, distant 308.15 feet North from the meander corner in said West line; thence North along the West line thereof a distance of 234.10 feet thence deflecting right 89 degrees 36 minutes to the East line of the West 264.91 feet of Government Lot 5; thence South along the East line thereof 234.10 feet; thence Westerly to the point of beginning. Also, Outlot A, STARRWOOD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • L s.i J Guille Addition DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1990, by DAVID AND LINDA GUILLE, husband and wife, hereinafter jointly referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 1.47 acres and Preliminary Platting of 1.47 acres into three single fmaily lots and road right-of-way for construction of two additional single family homes, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #24-89, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated July 12, 1989, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 18, 1989, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. City acknowledges that Developer may wish to complete the final platting for the Property in two phases. In that event, the Developer acknowledges and agrees as follows: A. No final plat shall be approved by City which causes, or creates any variance for the existing structures, or lots. B. Prior to release by City of the first final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to execute a special assessment agreement with the City which establishes that the Developer agrees that the Property shall be assessed for sufficient costs to cover construction of the following public streets and utilities to service the Property: Mitchell Road (I.C. 52-051) Connection fee for additional water service to Lot 1, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto C. Prior to release by City of the first final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to remove the deck from the existing house on the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. D. Developer acknowledges that, in order to meet City Code setback requirements, it is necessary for Developer to remove portions of the existing structures on the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees, therefore, that, prior to City approval of the second final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the Building Department, and shall obtain the Building Department's approval of, a permit for relocation or removal of those portions of the structure necessary such that setback requirements are met for such structures. Developer further agrees to complete said structural relocation, or removal, prior release by the City of the second final plat for the Property. E. Developer agrees that the second final plat for the Property shall be submitted to the City within two years of the date of this Agreement. 4. If Developer, or future lot owner, of the Property require a land alteration permit for grading or construction on the Property, such Developer, or future lot owner, shall notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours prior to grading, tree removal, or tree cutting on the Property. Prior to issuance by City of any such land alteration permit for grading upon the Property, Developer, or future lot owner, agrees to implement erosion control measures and adequate protective measures for areas to be preserved and areas where grading is not to occur, and to obtain City approval of said measures. Prior to approval by City, Developer, or future lot owner, whomever has installed such protective measures, shall call for an on-site inspection of the Property by City, and any defects in materials or workmanship shall then be determined by City. Defects in materials or workmanship shall then be corrected by such Developer or future lot owner. Such defects shall then be corrected by such Developer or future lot owner, reinspected and approved by the City prior to release of said land alteration permit. Approval of materials and workmanship may be subject to such conditions as the City may impose at the time of acceptance. 5. Developer acknowledges that public sanitary sewer is currently available to the Property, including Lot 3, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, which is the site of the existing home on the Property. Therefore, Developer agrees to connect the existing house on said Lot 3 to public sanitary sewer no later than two years after the date of this agreement. c a Developer further agrees that, concurrent with and as part of such sanitary sewer connection to the existing house Lot 3, the existing septic system shall be abandoned and sealed in accordance with City Code requirements. Prior to removal of said septic system, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee the restoration of the property to grade and the proper sealing of said septic system. Upon approval by City that said septic system is properly sealed, City shall return such check to Developer. C CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-191 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE #24-89 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance #24-89 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of August, 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance #24-89 which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance #24-89 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk I7,2, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 24-89 II AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of McCoy Lake on Twin Lakes Crossing, from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. II ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson City Clerk Mayor • PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1990. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) l CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-209 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF GUILLE ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of GUILLE ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for GUILLE ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated August 15, 1990. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on AUGUST 21, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician. • DATE: August 15, I990 RE: Final Plat Report for Guille Addition PROPOSAL: The owners, David and Linda Guille,have requested City Council approval of the final plat of Guille Addition. Located at the southeast corner of Twin Lakes Crossing and Starrwood Circle, the plat contains 1.47 acres to be divided into two single family lots, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. This property is intended to be platted in two phases,with the second phase resulting in further subdivision of Lot 1 into two lots, however, this will not occur until there are structural alterations to the existing house. This is expected to occur within a two-year period. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July I8, 1989 per Resolution No. 89-I 61. Second reading of Ordinance No. 24-89, changing zoning from Rural to R1-I3.5, is scheduled for final approval at the City Council meeting August 21, I990. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution August 21, 1990. VARIANCES: Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six- month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's report. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities,roadways and walkways are currently in place and available to serve this site. Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall execute a special assessment agreement with the City that states the property shall be assessed for sufficient cost to cover construction of the Mitchell Road public improvement project. /i;iii Final Plat-Guille Addition August 15,1990 Page 2 of 2 PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will conform to City Code and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding will conform to City Code and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Guille Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$486.00 2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$250.00 3. Execution of special assessment agreement JJ:ssa cc: David and Linda Guille Frank Cardaralle CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ?! AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING AMENDMENTS OF THE CITY'S GUIDE PLAN AND CITY CODE CHAPTERS 11, RELATING TO ZONING, AND 12, RELATING TO SUBDIVISIONS OF LAND, WITH RESPECT TO LANDS WITHIN 2,700 FEET OF THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL. THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Findings. There is located in the southwest quandrant of the intersection of Pioneer Trail and Highway 169 the Flying Cloud Landfill ("Landfill") consisting of approxima- tely seventy-two (72) acres. The owners of the Landfill have made application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to expand the Landfill both vertically and horizontally with the horizontal expansion to encompass an additional forty-two (42) acres. The elevation of the expanded Landfill when capped would be approximately 923 feet above sea level. The Landfill has been polluting the ground water with approximately thirty (30) volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which have contaminated water underlying and in proximity to the Landfill, including the Prairie Du Chien Aquifer. The VOCs have spread off-site into seeps and springs in the adjoining Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and wetlands. Contaminants con- tain known cancer causing agents. There is evidence of contamination of soil gas and ground water with chlorinated and non-chlorinated volatile organic com- pounds, in and around the Landfill, including the Minnesota River Valley bluff adjacent to the Landfill. Most recently the City has become aware that methane gas has also been detected in the Minnesota River Valley bluff beyond the area of the filled por- tion of the Landfill. An expert retained by the City, Dr. Clyde Hertzman, stated that contamination in and around the Landfill is similar to that which was found in a study of the Upper Ottawa Street Landfill in Canada. He also stated that the VOCs found in and around the Landfill are capable of producing mood and narcotic symptoms similar to those which were found in the study. Evidence indica- tes that concentrations of VOCs which are known to have narcotic and anesthetic properties were found at the Landfill at levels at or exceeding standards for workroom air in Canada and the United States. Many of the VOCA are heavier than air and will tend to travel along the ground when released. Certain of the lands in -1- Th••A £I L '6Z8Z T 9 NOSh303N7 .11r H•J 7NH1 9£:£T OH1 O6-9 T-'J'OH the vicinity of the Landfill are at elevations lower than 923 feet above sea level which may provide pockets for the collection of the heavier than air VOCs. Evidence also indicates the presence of hydrogen sulfide at the methane flare inlet. Concentrations of hydrogen sulfide in excess of 90 parts per million were found. Problems with respiratory and eye irritation have been reported with hydrogen sulfide exposures as low as five parts per million. Industrial carcinogens, benzene and vinyl chloride were found in some soil gas samples in concentrations near or exceeding occupational standards. Seeps in the area of the Landfill contain Dichlorodifluoromethane, Dichlorofluoromethane, vinyl chloride and benzene. Vinyl chloride and benzene are known and confirmed human carcinogens. Dichlorofluoromethane, also known as Freon 21, is toxic to the liver and central nervous system. Dichlorodifluoromethane is also neuro toxic, as is Dischlorofluoromethane. Dr. Hertzman is of the opinion that the expansion of the Landfill poses a potential threat to the health of residents similar to that experienced at the Upper Ottawa Street Landfill site. That study concluded there is a valid, positive association between adults residing near a landfill and several analyzed health conditions, including respiratory conditions, skin conditions, certain central nervous system and mood symptoms. Respiratory conditions include bronchitis, shortness of breath, cough and phlegm. Skin conditions include rashes and dry or itchy skin. Narcotic symptoms include frequent or severe headaches, frequent dizziness, blurred vision, constant fatigue, lethargy and drowsiness and problems with balance, coordination, reaction time and clumsiness. Mood symptoms include insomnia, frequent feelings of anxiety or depression, irritability, hyperactivity or restlessness and learning or memory problems. It is Dr. Hertzman's opinion that it would be prudent and reasonable to withhold approval of new housing projects within 2,700 feet of the Landfill until it is decided whether the Landfill will be re-opened and that if it is re-opened it would be important to conduct airborne monitoring studies to insure that effluents from the site would not get into the new develop- ment under worst case operating conditions. Section 2. Purpose. In order to protect the planning pro- cess and the health, safety and welfare of those who would become residents of those areas hereafter described, (a) Study Authorized, Staff is authorized to conduct a study for the purpose of considering amendments of the City's Guide Plan and City Code Chapters 11, relating to zoning, and 12, relating to subdivisions of land with respect to lands within 2,700 feet of the proposed expansion of Flying Cloud Landfill; and 1 -2- fi O'd •i120e.ZP 19 NOSd3J3d`J !,'1 f1Hd DN' 1 i£:£T riHl 06-9T-Dn' (b) Prohibitions, No amendment to the City's Guide plan or City Code Chapters 11, relating to zoning, or 12, relating to subdivisions of land, with respect to lands within 2700 feet of the proposed expansion of Flying Cloud Landfill shall be made or permitted for a period of one (1) year from the effective date hereof and for such additional periods as may be deemed appropriate, and as determined by action of the Council by the amendment of this ordinance, not exceeding a total additional period of eighteen (18) months. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1990, and finally read and adopted and oFaered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1990. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of ( , 1990. -3- t'O d 2ILO6Z6ZI9 NOS2135321D Alma DNtl1 IY:SST fHl e6-9:-Intl E.•P «^ LARRIN, IiOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD. «�': '<..[. •lo.Dona• AETC",NE.3 AT LAW «•LaL• •��•..P•..a•<..•» Caw.. . aO[l N•R 1 0•[• ISOO Nl3FTHw ESTE DN PINANC'A:CENTED WOO PO,0,1Arr0AT!OWES •t^t.'^��' tT U a. .X 7000 ERNES AVENUE SOUTH 222 H SOUT NINTH SiNC LT :.Ft I. 0 w[. •[ .000.ExurwOrtEx y +0!. 0WEIMINGTON,M.30a5al A 55.31 MINNEAPOLI4....NE50T4 34.OL • •T.•J.,..•N.f .wa• 0•ac0•.L•Oaf T•0 • [.•Olal TELEPHONE ISIt.53S•30.10 TELEPNEINC 10121338•°MG L•7••.cwln.a+• wEV •S.•00all. EAR 10121 096.3333 [•x 1612.336.060 • w0f^ ww• waffle ot..•a Js uHw .i »Care NORTH 5001.040.O.OMGE • WWI...a. w.E•all a.JACNN•. 0330 0P at•GB OT)0.001...E.SUITE l OG +JOw• Olt•L L..ao•.a�J.. 1 Jew a•wI . COON•A•10s,M1NNCSOTA ssw33 ••aN,•�• Twpwaa J.•Nww 4.a6•UT[•. _OWNS. TELLPHONE Iea 766.7111 'Pl.0...a TODO., [6.1t•1Tn,J•. 11Ta.wf.a.•DwMp. [Ax 1612 t 706.071. e: oi'n1t..• f Seca JO.Tw ,`UN wDou,” Ja •� "0"..• Reply to Bloomington• M.L..J.. a raa.M µ.ND[Ni c,El Ot pc[ l` a•w •w S. 0,nf n.o-+•a..•1c•Dnc 1,00N10 J.PEAT • August 10, 1990 '"OOOOso• D.. Honorable Allan W. Klein Administrative Law Judge Office of Administrative Hearings 500 Flour Exchange Building 310 Fourth Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 Re: Flying Cloud Contested Case Our File No.: 9985-41 Dear Judge Klein: Enclosed for filing are the followings a. Motion for Continuance of Contested Case Hearing; b. Affidavit of Stephen S. Benton; and c. Affidavit of Christopher J. Dietzen. In view of the subject matter of the motion, Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc., would request leave to argue the motion on Monday, August 13, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., prior to the commencement of the rebuttal testimony. Applicant believes that the motion should be heard and decided prior to the commencement of the rebuttal testimony. I realize that this does not afford the other parties the time required under the rules to respond to {{f fy � 1 LARN TN, HOFFMIAN. DALY ec LINDGREN, LTD. Honorable Allan W. Klein August 10, 1990 Paae 2 a motion. However, it is Applicant's hope that the motion will not be opposed. Sincerely, Christopher . Dietzen, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. bh cc: Richard Rosow Grant Merritt Dwight Wagenius Stephen Benton Robert J. Herres, Jr. John Curry CJD:NL9s �' -6j STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PCA-88-008-AK 6-2200-2486-2 In the Matter of the Application of Woodlake Sanitary Services, Inc., Permittee, for Expansion of MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE the Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill OF CONTESTED CASE HEARING (Permit SW-14), Eden Prairie, Hennepin County. TO: City of Eden Prairie and its attorney, Richard F. Rosow, Lang, Pauly s Gregerson, Ltd., 4400 IDS Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; Homeward Hills Homeowners Association and its attorney Grant J. Merritt, Merritt 8 Associates, Ltd., 4690 IDS Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402; and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and its attorney, Dwight S. Wagenius, Office of the Attorney General, 520 Lafayette Road, Suite 200, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 1. Belief Sought. Applicant moves for a continuance of the contested case hearing pending completion of a review to determine the location of refuse in the proximity of the barrier wells presently under construction; and to locate the source of the methane gas venting in the upper half of the bluffs south of the Flying Cloud Landfill. Applicant believes that it will take approximately ninety (90) days to complete the review. 2. Basis. Recently Stephen S. Benton, President of Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. (WSS) learned that refuse was encountered during construction of several barrier wells near the topof the bluffs, and that methane } gas was venting out the upper portion of the south bluffs at the landfill. Subsequent soil borings have confirmed the presence of refuse at two locations between GWD5 and GWD7. Additionally, tests have also confirmed the presence of methane gas at the upper portion of the south bluffs. As a result, Stephen S. Benton ordered additional testing and analysis by WSS consultants to determine whether any changes are warranted in the design of the barrier well system and the landfill gas extraction system. Mr. Benton also believes that it is in the public interest to disclose the report attached to his affidavit and does so at this time. It is estimated that the review will take approximately ninety (90) days. 3. F.videoce. This motion is supported by the Affidavits of Stephen S. Benton and Christopher J. Dietzen, and all other pleadings on file herein. Dated: August 10, 1990 Christopher Dietzen Registration o. 22858 LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. Attorneys for Applicant 1500 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South B7.00mington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 835-3800 kI k CJD:OU9s 2. 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PCA-88-008-AK 6-2200-2486-2 In the Matter of the Application of Woodlake Sanitary Services, Inc., Permittee, for Expansion of AFFIDAVIT OF STEPHEN S. BENTON the Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill (Permit SW-]4), Eden Prairie, Hennepin County. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Stephen S. Benton, being duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. I am the President of Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. (WSS). I have held this position since March 12, 1990. My duties include the overall management of all WSS affiliates located in a twelve-state area, comprising the Upper Midwest and Rocky Mountain States, engaged in the collection, transportation, recycling and disposal of waste materials. 2. Prior to becoming President of Woodlake, I was employed as District Manager by Browning-Ferris, Inc., a 1' Maryland corporation and an affiliate of WSS, in Fairfax, Virginia, from July 25, 1988, to March 11, 1990. My duties included overall management of the Fairfax facility, which was engaged in the collection, recycling and transportation of residential, commercial and industrial solid waste materials. 3. On July 30, 1990, my office was notified by an employee of WSS of the potential presence of methane gas along the bluff area that comprises the southern boundary of the Flying Cloud Landfill. 4. Upon receiving this information, I directed that a preliminary review be conducted, which took place on July 31, August 1, August 2, and August 3, 1990. This preliminary review indicated that refuse and methane were present near the bluff in areas where this had not been anticipated by me. This preliminary review also revealed the presence of a document concerning methane levels in the bluff area that had not been previously submitted, which document is attached hereto. 5. Based on the results of the preliminary review on August 8, 1990, I directed that a further review of this matter be conducted. This was done to assure me of the technical merit of the expansion project and that the record before the MPCA was complete and correct. This review has five elements. 6. First, the soil boring program, conducted by Twin City Testing, will continue as necessary to delineate the extent of refuse in the bluff area. 7. Second, Mr. John Dickson of Barr Engineering and Dr. James Mahar will review and assess the impact of refuse in the bluff area on bluff stability, and recommend necessary remedial measures, if any. 8. Third, Dr. John Ouswa of GeoTrans, Inc., will review and assess the impact of refuse in the bluff area on the 2. effectiveness of the barrier well system as presently designed, and recommend necessary modifications, if any. 9. Fourth, Mr. Richard Echols of Browning-Ferris Services, Inc., will review and assess the impact of refuse in the bluff ared 'on the effectiveness of the current methane extraction system, and recommend necessary modifications, if any. 10. Fifth, I will review internal operating practices at Flying Cloud concerning the handling and dissemination of technical data, including a review of all current files concerning the technical issues relating to the expansion project. 11. I anticipate that this review will take approximately ninety (90) days to complete. 12. At the conclusion of this review, I intend to place a report of this review into the record of this proceeding. FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. 91 7' Step tlen S. Benton Subscribed and sworn to before me this�li... day of August, 1990.- Note Public cHnmSTOpMEA J.OIETZEN y NOTAHENiiEPUIN COUNTA My Comm�Seron E■piru 3.14•24 CJD:OV5s 11 3. as, Phone (612)544-5543 tt M C O R P C A A T E O ItSSUAAnat Of OUALI Y FAX No.(612)525-33T/ lKE Facsimile Transmittal Cover Sheet Date: Au.vat 3 ,\g cin Time: iO 1D To r FAX No.. `VI\- � S 5%. Number of Pages(Including This cover):_3 Sender: l� PACE Project No.• Comments: ' • _ t • To: FrOM. Subject: • Date: "I\15 1.1•11110. •••=m..... •••=ilio....•••••• •• • Pace labcrotories, • I 0 - t W x O O. O O A ge p r 0 o o• o a 'I Z c o iR w s. a w :R u m / r ,7 a • 8 c • a .� r /« -n . / c 30 / • M z z m w o a o• o w w coo ©• n c o m 0 < n 0 * m W m IN q it W \ a d O .n a I . I � n . I I O 4 N 0 O. O. 1 f I .6 O 0. O o. 0 O t jj 0b' 0 it :' \ ' 1 St O a a a « a « •H a • i . 2 90'Ot 06'TO Ent ;L:,:/, '0b1 131 JNI 331id STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PCA-88-008-AK 6-2200-2486-2 In the Matter of the Application • of Woodlake Sanitary Services, Inc., Permittee, for Expansion of AFFIDAVIT OF the Flying Cloud Sanitary Landfill CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN (Permit SW-14), Eden Prairie, Hennepin County. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Christopher J. Dietzen, being duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. My name is Christopher J. Dietzen and I am trial counsel for Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. (WSS) in connection with the above-captioned matter. I am competent to testify as to the matters stated herein which are based on my own personal knowledge. 2. As stated in the Affidavit of Stephen S. Benton, the ti methane survey attached to his Affidavit first came to our attention last week. Therefore, it does not appear that the document was produced during discovery. 3. I have spoken to Dr. John Guswa, Richard Echols and John Dickson and estimate that the review will be completed in approximately ninety (90) days. I believe the review is tt necessary to determine whether any changes are warranted in the design of the barrier well system and the landfill gas extraction system. { 4. During the review, it would be in the best interest of all parties and result in judicial economy to have the hearings continued. Essentially, the results of the review may effect the testimony of several witnesses proffered by WSS including Dr. Guswa, Mr. Echols and Mr. Dickson regarding the design of the barrier well and landfill gas extraction systems and stability of the bluffs. At the conclusion of the review, WSS will request the opportunity to present additional testimony on these issues. Christopher J. ietzen Subscr3,bed and sworn to before me this/0'4 day of August, 1990. Notary Public j BEflNAO[ff!M.MAI M l` NOW MC•MINNESOtA MINNENN COUNTY MY Comm.14.0a.t1 1999 CJD:OVOs 2. lirvJ