HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/10/1990AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AND
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990 6 P. M., COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS: Gary D. Peterson, Mayor; Richard
Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia
Pidcock, Douglas Tenpas
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Bud Baker, Chairperson; Pat
Breitenstein, Karon Joyer, David
Kuechenmeister, Paul Karpinko, Pat
Richard, Del Vanderploeg
I. Review of Capital Improvement Program for Park and Open Page 1457
Space Plan
II. Community Center Entry Page 1469
III. Landscaping Medians Page 1476
III. Trails and Sidewalk Policy Page 1496
IV. Other Issues/Concerns of Council or Commission Members
V. Adjournment
specmeet/10
TUESDAY, JULY 10, 1990
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean
Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas Tenpas
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the
City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director
of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Rebecca Brazys
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, JunePla 1990
III. CONSENT CALENDAR •
A. Clerk's License List
B. Authorization to Issue Certificates of Indebtedness for Radio
Tower
C. Authorize MWCC Permit Application for Boulder Pointe Townhomes
Resolution No. 90-176)
D. Approval of Final Plat of Edenvale Industrial Park 8th Addition
(l ocated at the Northwest corner of Corporate Way and
Martin Drive) Resolution No. 90-172
E. Award Contract for I.C. 52-156 Extension of Mitchell Road to
riTdiify Road #1 TRisiiTaion No. 90-173)
F. Joint Cooperation Agreement for CDBG Fiscal Years 1991, 1992, 1993
TRi-s-(31ution No. 90-
G. NELSON ADDITION by David Nelson. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No.
35-89, RiiT)517i from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 2.41 acres; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Nelson Addition; and Adoption of
Resolution No. 90-162, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 35-89
Ordering Publication of Said Summary. (Ordinance No. 35-89 -
Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-162 - Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
Page 1498
Page 1505
Page 1506
Page 1509
Page 1510
Page 1512
Page 1515
Page 1517
City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,July 10, 1990
H. BOULDER POINTE WEST TOWNHOMES by David Carlson Companies, Inc.
2nd Readingof Ordinance No. 22-90, Rezoning from R1-22 to RM-6.5
on 8.26 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Boulder Pointe
West Townhomes; and Adoption of Resolution No. 90-161, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance No. 22-90 and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. (Ordinance No. 22-90 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-161 -
Authorizing Summary and Publication)
I. Summary of Findings on the Proposed Flying Cloud Airport Noise
Abatement Plan (Resolution No. 90-171)
J. Approve Agreement with Mn/DOT for Traffic Signal at Dell Road and
1.H.5 (Resolution No. 90-178)
K. Partial Release of Open Space Agreement for Olympic Hills Golf
Course
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE by Holtze Brothers Development Company.
ecrli—iest for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers
on 5.6 acres, Zoning District Change from Office and C-Reg to C-
Reg-Ser on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 7.2 acres into one lot and one outlot for
construction of a 220 unit hotel development. Location: Southwest
corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle. (Ordinance
No. 23-90-PUD-10-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No.
90-165 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from June 19, 1990
B. VILLAGE KNOLLS by Argus Development. Request for Planned Unit
ffil7i5jiment Concept Review on 42.7 acres, Planned Unit Development
District Review with waiverss on 8.7 acres, Zoning District
Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 8.7 acres. Preliminary
Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single family lots, 2 outlots and road
right-of-way for a residential development. Location: East of
Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive. (Resolution No. 90-166 -
PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90 - PUD District and
Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-167 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from
June 19, 1990
C. BENTEC by Bentec Engineering Corporation. Request for Zoning
57-isict Amendment and Site Plan Review within the Office Zoning
District on 1.85 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board
of Appeals for construction of a 1900 square foot addition to the
Bentec Engineering building. Location: 13050 Pioneer Trail.
(Ordinance No. 24-90 - Zoning District Amendment) Continued from
June 19, 1990
D. CHI CHI'S RESTAURANT by Consul Restaurant Corporation. Request for
ffinned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, within the
overall Preserve Commercial Park North Planned Unit Development
and Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 2.23
acres and Site Plan Review on 2.23 acres for construction of an
additional parking lot for Chi Chi's Restaurant. Location:
Prairie Center Drive and Crystal View Road. (Ordinance No.
25-90-PUD-11-90 - PUD District and Zoning District Amendment.
Page 1524
Page 1531
Page 1536
Page 1543
Page 1544
Page 1567
Page 1590
Page 1593
City Council Agenda - 3 - Tues.,July 10, 1990
E. VACATION 90-06 - VACATION OF DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN
EMIT& 12 BLOCK YORKNIRE POINT —(11g55tion No. 90-174)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS
VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Receive Petition and Authorize Preparation of a Feasibility Study
to Consider and Street Improvementrfor Staring Lane and
lffdge Road and Vicinity, I.C. 52-203 (ResoldfTa'n No. 90-175)
VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
IX. APPOINTMENTS
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Councilmembers
1. Summer Vacation Schedules for Councilmembers (continued from
NWa—T9T—TWI)-
B. Report of City Manager
C. Report of City Attorney
D. Report of Director of Planning
E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources
F. Report of Finance Director
G. Report of Director of Public Works
XI. NEW BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1595
Page 1596
Page 1605
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources
DATE: May 18, 1990
SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Update
Attached is a 1990-2000 Capital Improvement Program projection.
As you know, this CIP is updated on an annual basis based on
decisions the City Council makes regarding general fund commitments
toward park projects and petitions from neighborhoods, as well the
amount of actual cash parks fees that are generated each year.
In regards to your specific questions, this plan calls for the
following:
1. Boyce property repayment to the Utility Fund - $475,000 will
have to be borrowed from the Utility Fund in 1990 and is
proposed to be paid back in the following amounts - $200,000
in 1991, $200,000 in 1992, $150,000 in 1993 and $100,000 in
1994. Exact amounts should be determined by John Frane, but
should hopefully fit within those general perimeters. Two-
hundred thousand dollars should be taken from the cash park
fee fund this year.
2. Miller Park Referendum - This CIP calls for a 3.5 million
dollar referendum in either 1991 or 1992. Initial expenditure
in this CIP calls for $300,000 to be spent in 1992, basically
on plans and specifications for the entire site including
grading, roads, utilities, and structures. Construction to
begin in 1993 and completed in 1996. This plan also calls for
a 1.5 million dollar referendum in 1998 for construction of
an outdoor swimming pool in Miller Park.
3. Parkland Acquisition Fund - The revenue projections call for
a general fund budget of $175,000 in 1991, $200,000 in 1992,
$225,000 in 1993, $200,000 in 1994, and $200,000 in 1995. If
you look at the bottom line of the expenditure side of the CIP
that is referred to as "Total minus T.I.F. and Referendum",
you will note the amount of expenditure each year minus the
referendum for Miller Park and the T.I.F. for the Purgatory
Creek Recreation Area. Staff would expect approximately
$300,000 a year in cash park fees, so you are able to project
approximately how much additional revenue from the general
fund would be required to fund the 10 Year Capital Improvement
Program beyond projects projected for referendum or TIF
funding.
Capital Improvement Update -2-
4. Parks Improvement Fund - You will note that the cash park fee
fund should be sufficient to accommodate the park improvement
portion of the CIP outside of the Purgatory Creek Recreation
Area and Miller Park improvements.
5. Community Center - This CIP does not show any planned improve-
ments for the Community Center other than the $75,000 entry
improvements that are projected to be funded through donations
or purchasing the bricks. There is a recommendation that the
City bond for office accommodations for the recreation staff
at either a new City Hall or an expansion to the Community
Center to accommodate those staff, if the City Council deter-
mines they should remain at the Community Center. It is my
understanding members of the Hockey Association will be
contacting the City to propose some alternative method to
financing a second sheet of ice at the Community Center other
than a referendum. I would anticipate they may be suggesting
cash park fees or general fund monies for that purpose.
6. Trails Fund - The Majority of the trail system that has yet
to be completed within the City is along City streets, which
will apparently be budgeted through the Public Works Capital
Improvement Program. The major trail improvements within City
parks will occur in the following areas:
1991 - Trail 'along Purgatory Creek between Anderson Lakes
Parkway and Staring Lake Parkway - $15,000
1992 - Trail across Purgatory Creek from Antlers Ridge to
Branching Horn - $12,000
1992 - Trail along Purgatory Creek from Hwy 5 north and west
to Mitchell Road - $20,000
1992 - Woodchip trail in Timber Creek Park - $3,000
1993 - Trail within Hidden Ponds Park west to Highway 101 -
$25,000
1993 - Trail from Crosstown Hwy 62 along Beach Road; then east
to the Hanley property and Bryant Lake Park - $40,000
1995 - Trail along the north end of Red Rock Lake connecting
with Boulder Pointe Trail - $30,000
1996 - Trail from Topview Park north to Cardinal Creek Road -
$35,000
1998 - Trail connection along Nine-Mile Creek from Smetana
Lake north to Lee Data - $40,000
Trails within Smetana Lake Park are also included in the
Smetana Lake Park development project.
BL:mdd - update/9
1990-2000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTIONS
May 17, 1990
ACOUISITION:
Lake Riley - Total $1.150.000
- Approximately $500,000 is estimated for acquisition of the 24
acre Jacques property in 1990. Funds are budgeted in 1993
through 1997 for projected acquisition of single family
residential parcels along the lake south of the existing park and
for the additional wooded parcel between the "Jacques property"
and the railroad tracks. Timing will be dependent on when the
property comes up for sale. The remaining property between the
Jacques parcel and the railroad to the east should be acquired
as soon as possible.
Prairie Bluff Park - Total $500.000
- An estimated acquisition of $500,000 for bluff property along the
Minnesota River valley bluffs is projected for 1998, will depend
on proposed development of this property.
Smetana Lake Park - Total $200.000
- Acquisition of approximately 4 acres is proposed on the north
shore of Smetana Lake for public access and limited picnicking.
This is proposed as a joint project with the Nine-Mile Creek
Watershed District.
Rice Marsh Lake Neighborhood Park - Total $300.000
- $150,000/year has been budgeted for 1992 and 1993 to purchase a
15-20 acre parcel on the east end of Rice Marsh Lake that would
serve as the neighborhood park for all residential properties
north of 212 and west of Mitchell Lake.
Crestwood Neighborhood Park - Total $300,000
- $300,000 is budgeted for 1999 acquisition of a neighborhood park
to serve the Crestwood area neighborhood. Timing will be dependent on development.
Cedar Forest Neighborhood Park - Total $300.000
- $300,000 is budgeted for acquisition of a 15-20 acre neighborhood
park parcel to serve the Cedar Forest neighborhood in 1995.
Staring Lake Park - $850.000
- Funds are proposed for 1990 thru 1994 for the acquisition of the
Boyce property. Funding for this $675,000 acquisition would be
accomplished by borrowing from the Utilities Fund and reimbursing
at current interest rates. Interest and taxes will bring the
total cost to approximately $850,000. The Metropolitan Airports
Commission will be negotiating to acquire the Janikula property,
immediately east of the Boyce property. M.A.C. would be willing to sublease that property for park use, with restrictions.
Minnesota River Valley - Total 8300.000
- Funds are budgeted for 1996 thru 2000. The City has targeted
approximately 160 acres of floodplain land and bluff property
along the Minnesota River valley for park purposes that will be
tied into the Minnesota River Valley Refuge and Recreation Area.
Actual timing for acquisition will depend on when parcels become
available for sale. Acquisition costs could vary from donations
to extremely expensive, depending on development potential.
PARR DEVELOPMENT:
Community Center - Total 875.000
- $75,000 is budgeted in 1991 for development of pedestrian
vehicular improvements to the access of the Community Center and
Community Center parking lot.
- Funds should be allocated in 1992 for construction of recreation
offices and a storage addition. This is dependent on decisions
made for City Hall construction. The City should plan for
offices for recreation staff at a new city Hall, if money is not
made available for offices at the Community Center.
Round Lake Park - Total $153.000
- $8,000 budgeted in 1990 for softball field fence improvements.
- $10,000 budgeted in 1991 for expansion of concrete around the two
park shelters and the entry to the swimming beach area.
- $20,000 budgeted for 1991 for extension of the irrigation lines
to the turf around the park shelter and tennis court area.
- $40,000 budgeted in 1992 to replace the marina building with a combination boat/rental building and satellite maintenance
storage facility that will be used for storing mowers, Cushman,
weed whips, etc. during the summer months and boat storage
during the winter months.
- $15,000 budgeted in 1993 for construction of dugouts and
extending the bleachers at the baseball field.
- $10,000 budgeted in 1994 for extension of foul line fencing and
improvements in the baseball field.
- $50,000 budgeted in 1998 for lighting softball field #4.
Staring Lake Park - Total 855.000
- 815,000 budgeted in 1991 for installation of an irrigation
system.
- $20,000 budgeted in 1995 for permanent fencing of the two
competition softball fields.
- $20,000 budgeted in 1997 for irrigation of the two completed
softball fields.
Riley Lake Park - Total $410.000
- $35,000 budgeted in 1990 and $15,000 in 1991 to accomplish the
requirements for the 1988 LAWCON grant, which includes expanding
the swimming beach area, moving the boat launch further to the
north, realigning Riley Lake Road and expanding parking.
- $100,000 budgeted in 1994 for grading and seeding of the Jacques
property.
- $100,000 budgeted in 1996 for improvements to the park including
construction of playground facilities, expansion of parking lot,
installation of tennis courts, backstops, and minimal security
lighting in the parking lots.
- $100,000 budgeted in 1998 for development of the Riley Lake
homestead area including improvements to the barn and the main
home to be usable for park programs and park maintenance
facility.
- $50,000 budgeted in 1999 for relocation of the boat launch to
the southern corner of the park contingent upon acquisition of
all of the single family homes south of the park and west of the
railroad tracks. This will also include final expansion of the
parking facilities for Riley Lake Park.
Miller Park - Total $4.900.000*
- $10,000 is budgeted for 1990 to accomplish the minimal
construction of a gravel base access and parking lot for a public
boat access, for seeding of the picnic areas, removal of dead
vegetation, etc.
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1991 for installation of an aeration
system.
- $300,000 is budgeted in 1992, $2,000,000 in 1993 and $500,000 in
1994 and 1995. Assuming a referendum would be passed in 1991 or
1992, the $300,000 during 1992 would be for planning and
engineering fees, the remaining three years of funding would be
for development of the park.
- $50,000 is budgeted for 1996 and $30,000 for 1999 for completion
of park facilities not included in the referendum.
- $1,500,000 is allocated in 1998 for construction of an outdoor
pool and related facilities.
Puraatorv Creek Recreation Area - Total 52.625.000
- $25,000 is allocated for 1990 for a water control structure.
- $100,000 is budgeted in 1992 for design, specification and
engineering fees.
- $500,000 is budgeted in 1993 for dredging the boat basin and
adjacent ponding facility, and surcharging of entry.
- $1,500,000 is budgeted in 1994 for first phase development of the
entry, including grading and landscaping.
- $500,000 is budgeted in 1996 for second phase development of the
entry and completion of the hard surface trail around the entire
park, this includes construction of fountains, a shelter, and
marina.
This entire project should be considered as a T.I.F. project with
matching funds from the Watershed District. Other possible sources
of revenue include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ducks
Unlimited, the Corp of Engineers, and the Eden Prairie Foundation.
Homeward Hills Park - Total $50.000
- $30,000 is budgeted in 1990 for completion of the second floor
of the park shelter to accommodate year-round programming of that
facility.
- $20,000 is budgeted in 1992 for irrigation of the soccer field
and the softball field.
Franlo Park - Total $27 000
- $7,000 is budgeted in 1990 for installation of a permanent chain
link fence on the outfield of the baseball field.
- $20,000 is budgeted in 1994 for construction of a sun shelter and
a softball field fence.
Red Rock Lake Park - Total S50.000
- $40,000 is budgeted in 1990 for the 2nd phase of Red Rock Lake
Park including, paving the parking lots, tennis court installa-
tion, playground structure, and picnic area and installation of
an aerator.
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1998 for construction of a sun shelter.
Preserve Park - Total $65000
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1993 for regrading the skating rink west
of the hockey rink.
- $55,000 is budgeted in 1999 for replacing the park shelter with
a new warming house/picnic facility.
Prairie East Park - Total S15,000
- $5,000 is budgeted in 1990 for grading and seeding the expanded
picnic area and installing a small paved parking lot.
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1996 for construction of a sun shelter.
Carmel Park - Total $35,000
- $25,000 is budgeted in 1990 for construction of playground
equipment, backstop and two tennis courts.
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1997 for construction of a sun shelter.
Hidden Ponds Park - Total $10.000
-$10,000 is budgeted in 1995 for construction of a sun shelter.
Pheasant Woods Park - Total 560.000
-$60,000 is budgeted in 1996 for construction of a lighted hockey
rink and skating rink and construction of a warming house/picnic
shelter.
Edenbrook Conservation Area - Total $70.000
- $30,000 is budgeted in 1991 for construction of a small parking
lot access and looped trail system throughout the park.
- $40,00 is budgeted in 1994 for construction of a picnic shelter.
Edenvale Park Conservation Area - Total $55.000
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1994 for construction of a loop trail
system around the perimeter of the park. This will include one
bridge over Purgatory Creek.
- $45,000 is budgeted in 1994 for replacing the park
shelter/warming house.
Purgatory Creek Trail - Total S60.000
$30,000 is budgeted in 1991 for construction of a trail from
Mitchell Road, southeast to the intersection of Highway 5 and
Prairie Center Drive, and to construct the creek crossing east
of Branching Horn.
- $20,000 is budgeted in 1992 to construct the creek crossing east
of Homeward Hills Park and to construct the trail from the
Staring Lake Park trail southeast under Highway 169 to Sunnybrook
Road.
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1995 to construct the trail form Homeward
Hills Road adjacent to Creekwood Park, south to County Road 1.
Prairie Bluff Park - Total S50.000
-$50,000 is budgeted in 1999 to develop a picnic shelter and trails
and parking access to the park on the bluff.
Rice Marsh Lake Park - Total $200,000
- $50,000 is proposed for 1995 for grading and seeding of Rice
Marsh Lake Park.
- $50,000 is proposed for construction of the parking lot, tennis
courts and playground structure in 1996.
- $100,000 is budgeted in 1997 for final improvements including the
trail system along the lakeshore and final improvements to the
neighborhood park.
Miller Spring - Total S10.000
- $10,000 is budgeted for 1993 for improvements to the spring,
which will include moving the spring back away from County Road
4 toward the creek, upgrading the parking lot and improving the
design of the pedestrian access to the spring and the visual
amenities at the spring.
Pioneer Park - Total $120.000
- $50,000 is budgeted in 1993 for grading and seeding.
- $30,000 is budgeted in 1994 and 1995 for facility improvements.
- $10,000 is budgeted in 1998 for a sun shelter.
Willow Park - Total $30,000
- $20,000 is budgeted in 1990 for construction of two tennis
courts.
- $10,000 is budgeted in the year 2000 for a sun shelter.
Cedar Forest Park - Total 9150.000
- $50,000 budgeted in 1996 for first phase development including
grading, seeding and landscaping.
- $100,000 budgeted for 1997 for 2nd phase development including
two tennis courts, basketball court, park shelter/warming house,
hockey rink and skating rink, and playground structure.
Crestwood Park - Total $50,000
- $50,000 budgeted in the year 2000 for 1st phase development of
Crestwood Park.
Creekwood Park - Total $5.000
- $5,000 budgeted in 1991 for construction of a parking lot with
access onto Homeward Hills Road (includes landscaping and
screening for parking lot.
Wyndham Knoll Park - Total 95.000
- $5,000 budgeted in 1992 for construction of trail system to
access points and to the Edenbrook Conservation Area.
Flying Cloud Fields - Total $155.000
- $55,000 is budgeted in 1990 for construction of a bypass and turn
lanes on County Road 1 and to replace backstops on fields 2, 3,
and 4.
- $20,000 is budgeted in 1991 for paving the park road and parking
lots.
- $30,000 is budgeted in 1993 for installing an irrigation system
to irrigate the entire site, provided that the Metropolitan
Airports Commission confirms no expansion in that area for a
minimum of 15 years.
Prairie View Park - Total 910.000
- $10,000 budgeted in 1990 for trail access to the west.
Forest Hills Park - Total $55.000
- $55,000 budgeted in the year 2000 for replacement of the park
shelter.
Smetana Lake Park - $50.000
- $25,000 is budgeted in 1992 and 1993 for trail and park improve-
ments proposed as a joint project with the Nine-Mile Creek
Watershed District.
Bike Trail Improvements - Total $270.000
$50,000 is budgeted in 1990 for improvements to trails along Eden
Prairie Road, County Road 1 and within parks such as Red Rock
Lake Park and making a connection at Larkspur Lane in the Pre-
serve trail system. Other funding includes $15,000 in 1991 for
the trail along Purgatory Creek of Anderson Lakes Parkway;
$15,000 in 1992 for a creek crossing trail between Antlers Ridge
and Branching Horn, the trail in Timber Creek Park; $65,000 in
1993 for the Hidden Ponds Park trail and the Bryant Lake Park
access trail; $30,000 in 1995 for completion of the tail along
the north shore of Red Rock Lake; $35,000 in 1996 for the Topview
Park trail connection to Cardinal Creek Road; $40,000 in 1998 for
the Nine-Mile Creek trail north of Smetana Lake.
Cip/c
1990-1995 ESTIMATED REVENUE FOR PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ESTIMATED REVENUE 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Fund 31 Balance 2 Beginning of Tear Cash Park Fees Fund 30 Softball Field Improvements Bond Referendum Tax Increment Finance Federal/State Grants Watershed District Grants Donations General Fund Budget Interest Accurst 350,700 300,000 10,800 -0- 235,800 13,000 157,500 15,000 52,800 300,000 11,000 30,000 175,000 20,000 113,800 300,000 11,000 3,500,000 100,000 100,000 30,000 200,000 145,000 3,529,800 300,000 11,000 .0- 250,000 275,000 10,000 225,000 135,000 1,505,800 300,000 11,000 -0- 1.250,00 250,000 10,000 200,000 115,000 1,106,800 300,000 11,000 250,000 100,000 200,000 150,000 Estimated Total Revenue $1,082,800 $588,800 $4,994,800 $4,735,800 $3,641,800 $2,117,800 Estiamted Total Expenses $1,030,000 $475,000 $ 970,000 $3,230,000 82,535,00 S1,450,000 estrev/7 May 18, 1990
.11111 ......... ••••n••••••n••••••• 1990 - 2000 CAPITAL 110910V996RT PRIAIRA11 ********** •nn••••••••••n••nM PROJECT CITE OTHER READS 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 199? 1990 1999 2000 AL001511109 kskIe 1.034.200 215.000 500,000 Prairit 11911 Park 500.000. 66E1464 Lake Park 150.M SO 000 Rice Marsh Park 300.000 lang 900.000 t%.000 150.000 150.009 150 000 500.000 104.090 200.000 restwood HaYH 300.000 kdar Pares? Perk 300.000 300.000 3W.N0 13.000 30,000 40.000 15.000 10 000 153.004 55 000 410.000 4.900 000. p5.000 05.000 100.000 109,000 100 000 30 000 10.000 25.000 50.000. 1 500.000. 30 000 500,000' 500 000 673 000 30 000 30.000 aokod Lake Park STarins Lake pr. III _Lake Park Miller Park purgatory ck kaL area ilmaevard Rills Park 15-S012 20.000 20.000 10,M1 300.0001 2.000.0001 500,000° 100 000 500.000 1 500 000 20,000 Starina Lat. Park 050.000 200.000 200.000 200.099 150.000 100.000 100 000 50.000 59.000 700,000 200,000 450,000 500,000 300,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 550.006 nImesota River 0a1199 300.004 441101/4 3,634,200 265,000 50.000 50 000 350,000 200.000 •••n••••• •••••••••••nnn•••••• PARE DEVILOPPENT Corasunitv CRASS, 75 000 EnnL9 P6A 27.1430 7.000 20.000 Mod MOCk like PiTt 09422 40 COO Preserve Park ALM 10.,C00 55 000 PialCie East Perk came Peri, Hidden Ponds P0r6 15.000 1.060 10,0 00e.s.t well Perk 60 000 N..P314 denbrook Conservoti. 70.000 naM. 40,009
g g g
82 5
§.
§ §
.
g
t
ILO
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources .
FROM: Barbara Penning CrossrLandscape Architect
DATE: June 29, 1990
SUBJECT: Community Center Entry Alternatives
The Eden Prairie Community Center was built during the summer of
1982. The front entry and parking lot was added in the fall of
that year. From the very beginning, the layout of the community
Center entry was a poor design. The paved area was placed where
people couldn't see it, and the shortest route to the building was
over the berms and through the grass and flowers.
Remedies to help the entry have been attempted. The flower bed
closest to the parking lot was removed and filled with concrete.
The bed near the building was raised to prevent people from walking
through it. Flowers have been tried in various configurations and
new sod has helped temporarily, but people still insist on taking
the shortest route and these efforts have failed.
People form their first impression of the Community Center as they
enter the parking lot. The entry off Valley View Road is narrow.
Entry to the drop-off area, or the parking lot is unclear to the
first time visitor. The sidewalk entry to the building is always
worn and dirty looking.
Staff have developed two completely different alternative designs
to improve the front entry of the Community Center. Each option
uses a different method of funding.
The first alternative (#1) is a major rework and a permanent
solution to the entry problem. The front entry has been widened
and realigned to make a safer and less confusing entrance into the
parking area or drop-off zone. The drop-off zone with six
temporary parking spaces and a traffic lane has been added so
circulation will not be hampered while cars are waiting outside
the building. The brick and concrete plaza has been designed with
pedestrians in mind. It can easily accommodate small groups of
people waiting for rides, or accommodate special events such as the
snow picnic. The plaza was designed to be functional, cutting down
all of the existing maintenance problems with the turf. It was
also designed to be a quality show piece indicative of the fine
facility and programming going on within the building.
The estimated cost of the No. 1 design is $275,730.
N
e
a
r
l
y
4
0
%
o
f
that cost is to correct the access road and dro
p
-
o
f
f
l
a
n
e
s
,
improving vehicle circulation. One method to fund t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
to sell personalized bricks bearing the name of the
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
o
r
o
r
their family. Eighteen inch by eighteen inch eng
r
a
v
e
d
g
r
a
n
i
t
e
blocks bearing a logo could also be sold to service
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
and corporations. Thirteen thousand two hundre
d
b
r
i
c
k
s
a
r
e
estimated to be used within the project. Bricks ar
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
be sold for $25 per brick. The actual cost of each e
n
g
r
a
v
e
d
b
r
i
c
k
would be $10, leaving $15 profit for every brick
s
o
l
d
.
G
r
a
n
i
t
e
engraved blocks would sell at $1000, leaving $750 pr
o
f
i
t
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
after the $250 cost for the materials and engravi
n
g
.
T
h
i
r
t
e
e
n
thousand two hundred bricks and 105 corporate logos
w
o
u
l
d
n
e
e
d
t
o
be sold to cover the cost of the entry. As bricks
a
r
e
s
o
l
d
,
t
h
e
personalized bricks could go into the plaza. Concret
e
s
l
a
b
s
c
o
u
l
d
serve temporarily until more bricks are ready to be
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
.
Staff has projected that 300 bricks would be sold t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
y
e
a
r
and 150 per year each subsequent year. Staff feels t
h
a
t
a
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
organization would be quite successful in selling bri
c
k
s
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
-
ject could be structured so that it could be a fund ra
i
s
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
a
t
organization for a number of years. A small amount
o
f
m
o
n
e
y
w
o
u
l
d
be earned by the service group for each brick sold
.
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of this project would proceed slowly, as bricks are s
o
l
d
.
The second alternative (# 2) is a temporary fix, bec
a
u
s
e
i
t
d
o
e
s
n
'
t
address the vehicular circulation system or the a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
f
i
r
s
t
impression. This alternative helps to make the
e
n
t
r
y
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
better at a small cost. No demolition costs are i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
for the planter which is always in the way. Con
c
r
e
t
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
added where people walk. Trees have been added t
o
b
r
e
a
k
u
p
t
h
e
concrete plaza and provide shade. The cost of t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
estimated to be $22,369. This project coul
d
b
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
aesthetically by removing the existing concrete in
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
a
r
e
a
.
Adding all new concrete would avoid a patchy look
i
n
g
p
l
a
z
a
.
T
h
e
cost of this project would be $59,000. Another u
p
g
r
a
d
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
project would be to use Bomanite. This is a con
c
r
e
t
e
t
h
a
t
i
s
colored and stamped to look like bricks. Cost fo
r
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
would be $82,100.
Alternative 112 would be funded by recommending it
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
1991 general fund budget.
ccentry/10
BPC:mdd
The above figures are estimates using contracted lab
o
r
.
A
t
h
i
r
d
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
has been proposed using City crews for all labor exc
e
p
t
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
and sod installation. The third alternative corrects
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
uses the same plaza area as in alternative #2. The c
o
s
t
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
from exposed aggregate in the Plaza rather than bric
k
,
a
n
d
f
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
c
r
e
w
s
doing the majority of the labor. The estimated cost
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
i
s
$104,916.
14,-70
J OB enomusn cerairt F1.3 -92-y SHEET NO DFlimit
JOB NO
Con OPOLIS CHECKED BY Intim% Imat.0.0•0
Mk Mimic meroalSOT• 14.01111
MADE BY DATE
DATE SEC. SHT NO
215 • mderr prairta
CALCULATIONS FOR
"."4...
Of item
None:ter
Specification
.
turn Oescriotion
end Unit ol Memos
UNIT PC' N.0 ele
Unit Price Amount
oQP- °oilers [MIS [Wars Cent,
eemove. comcf exe, colz. If moo
D- oo
Z000 00
IZZeOVE. Cbt4Cfg1e. SIDEduJALe.
477S0 00
tumove, 1%b %WM 1 ism oS
IT-ex:
Ai-F..14M :ADFANT 4*
E. I 15 00 et> 1 r-2 0o 00
eacctoz, evc-nrsic, u4i-m14 5 6,,, 10 700 00 42.00 ea
11F-P1wE, E4.4 cal xlci 1:31444TEf-
Lb i:Do 00 .500 00
642.601149 41124 P(;:vlet.:c4t- 'Tom" (12 .0% RePozz..-rDp so, CT _, 4151 SC' 10450 °CI
coxiezze, cup, . tome tacoNu)
LV 13o ' 177.r7o0 0°
errumiNloos 14.0 1 1.1 cis el,se,
' ;'Asplio4 ‘)Y
1700,Amidli z 5 °° 1r;000 0 0
Itt6:zpit k-UfaSE. AtkirgE3t7rS crJ
4'. Corrigre- 9,bs,F.
I I1 23i1
ID
So 1 1 q, 4co
" 5
oo
COhrterE, A-rt Das-16.6e-
47r— 1440
2. 1 c2 ,191;c) c°
EXPos ED ALieizzentwrE, 42Ao
LA ci -t-tri t.., - A0pr1oN1AL Fotis
' k wir-iNct EA z 22000 ec t0000 (3°
FLAtA PoLes
00
eok-AA‘DE. Tize-E 3 4 CALA pap.
1 t a:40 °° 221200 e°
'TEE, 642421/47E-5 (e. ' 6StlPeraE..
614124.NbS
EA 900
A 7,-)cn
CO
JOB
MADE By DATE
DATE
SHEET NO
JOB NO
SEC. SHT NO
on moots CHECKED BY mar DM /RAMA ROAD
COIN MAMA. PAINNASOTAIRIMMI
CALCULATIONS FOR
1L,..citication
or Item
Nonmor
Item Oeseriotion
end Unit Ot MOM!, UNIT
‘);"..1%-i
R_"C"Cc.Skl‘ IN
Lino Price Armin,
VIC „....,,O.. - \ ‘' 00113R2 CAOIS MAUD CAM!
1124a *-1 CONSTA4 NW c, LI ts) EFS
sop 61, ici co 1
2810 °°
$ 113O°°
,...----------- .---
.
.--------------
------......-----"
..--------------;
...--------
..---------------
...---"--....------.4
.---------------;.„..„„
_.-----------
.
-------......---
..--------------
..----------------
,-----------....-- _
1. 2 3 4 5
N 12 5964
Friends of
DEPOT PLAZA
Brick Application
Purchaser's Name
Address. City, State, Zip
Phone Number
The donation per brick is $20.00
company Brick Application. Checks ca
"Friends of Depot Plaza". The bricks wi
walkways and terraces of the DEPOT P
of your bricks will be shown on a 11 PLAZA after the bricks are
You may buy as many bricks as
boxes for up to five bricks below. Eac
Please Print Carefully Please Print Carefully
Date
1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 111 111111111111111
111111111111111 111111111111111
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY Brick No. Color No FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY Brick No. Color No
Please Print Carefully
Please Print Carefully
111111111111111 111111111111111
111111111111111 111[1111[111111
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY Brick No
Color No FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY Brick No. Color No
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
DEPOT PLAZA
Method of Payment: 0 cash Total Bricks • Recorded: 01 02 03 Buz 1796
Fang% ND 58107
0 Check Total 5 04 05 06 701 -241 -1351 White — Oltite Copy CUM,' - Nhinulactureig:Copy Pink — Purchaser's Copy
CM WWI. CHECKED BY 0111.1If 1110 n 0
NM WIll..0.114/1111.0
DATE EEC. ENT NO
.CALCULATIONS FOR
Joe erldivioNirty CE.1.11:V.f. EMIL)/ SHEET N
MADE BY DATE JOB NO
Spit to
or itom
wino:ter
Item Oescrionon
and Unit of Moamar. UNIT
ei1,11 ‘ t•-• tk ono
Unit Price Amount
ctg" ,..,,c \s-i-‘. Dolton Cents Donor: I Cent'
gaccA-re. fal. i-wiDFAKIT a . 6" V.I. Wrap ti"414 EA 1 r1oo 0° 1 )5 0° °°
FE.1.0c,oge,. ESICM Nkt Uq#111N9 EA 7" 70000 1,4-00 00 &FADING sliziP 403:14ALL'Itilt- cy art, 4 v'x' 1,029 00
conir-Fels, PAN", '49 47 z. 7 5 10550 c*
111-te%seccs 4400140 TKE-, EA I r70 c>"
46.4 Ft a 12 1 LS
EA 1000 a"
646.M.:Tp-066 S"amape.r-
EA 7,00 cx) z7oo '
\'ilzAati ConnANE.F. 4 u NC* „EA ...z.......„,...„------ 4-r7o "c)
4co
6r e),' 1
c.41. 1240
1rctrA,4- $ 22,369 00
,
_.,_,,
.--
__.
YYI
P
MICIS CHECKED BY DATE SEC. SHT. NO
MO INN NO.
Mitard SOYA lalMNIO
CALCULAT/ONS FOR
JOB CCMMU ITY CSId1.4` €14112)(
MADE BY
SHEET NO./Xi-14,4AM VE,
41. DATE JOB NO.
..a.
Of darn
Noneaer
Specification
I tens Oescriotion
and Unit OS Measure
UNIT Pi— tk '
Unit Price Amount
(131"
ale
Cents Dollars Cents
COM4VE0 COFP,
L., isGo 10 00
4GepE-6-A1 -E... FbA.6.f... Fog A6p4AL.1"
er-rHicv.. ttit..-ttp4Au, 01414) A7T 7) 10T-ico c°
As .E.i:Isti..1- PAw 1 nk,
bou. vu
Co:W.5E,
tJeAflAtJA coulatf,
sy a000 5 ct.0 1 5,000 oti
Sypos w oziGiaa-ATF,, Kau.. 1512. zs"" 5 l i toto '
'cowcfexe. capewagix...
e7V Z -15 7,Plta0 "1
kiwi poLas
EN 1000 3000 13°
5,1-i-Apc- 'TIMES V' CAIAPC+.
EA 00 .... -100 co
tr-SE- alsarns VsqUA.r.g.-
SA 4100 cp ZIOC) .241
640b5
E-k1/4
11.
cc' 460
lib
ilaA.4.44 Celt.SrAtitslEfs 4 LANE42-s
E.-4k ". 45 0 °C' 9 oo ee,
40D Sf Moo 1 2510 °•`'
/-'
„------7-------:,
---------________,
...----"--
,.---------------
.......
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources
DATE: June 26, 1990
SUBJECT: Landscape Medians
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission have spent
a number meetings discussing City beautification. One of the major
areas of concern is the grass median strip along Prairie Center
Drive in the Major Center Area. The Commission requested infor-
mation on the cost to construct and maintain landscaping within
these medians. Attached to this memo is a memo from Barb Cross
with projections for construction and maintenance of various land-
scape designs. Upon review of those figures, the Commission agreed
that installation and maintenance of large flower beds in those
areas is probably not feasible at this point in the City's develop-
ment, but also requested that landscaping of medians be discussed
with the City Council at a special meeting.
Some suggestions fdr improvements to medians include: installation
of trees, and smaller areas of flower beds at a limited number of
intersections. It has been suggested that perhaps a landscaping
plan for all of Prairie Center Drive should be developed and
included in the tax increment financing program for street improve-
ments in this area.
Commission members have also discussed the desirability of
improving the image of Eden Prairie by landscaping or planting
flowers along State and County roads where they enter the Eden
Prairie City limits. Bud Baker suggested that the City strongly
urge the State and County to do that sort of thing to Highway 494,
State Highway 5, and 169 before the PGA in 1991.
Commission members will look forward to discussing these ideas at
the July 10th meeting with the City Council.
BL:mdd
medians/10
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation &
Natural Resources
FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect
DATE: October 31, 1989
SUBJECT: Landscaping Medians and/or Major Intersections
Landscaping within center medians is an eye catching way to
beautify the City of Eden Prairie. Before decisions can be made
as to how and where the landscaping should be placed, the parks,
recreation and natural resources staff has gathered the following
information and concerns:
DESIGN
A wide array of design alternatives are possible, using plant
materials, paving, planters and lighting as the basic building
blocks.
The different colors and textures of plant materials should be
utilized to provide the most impact and visual stimulation.
Flowers in bloom all season would provide the biggest splash of
color. Annual flowers bloom more profusely all summer in a wider
variety of colors than do perennials.
Shrubs provide some screening between lanes and provide vertical
relief to the flatness of the roadway. Flowering shrubs will add
color as well as height to the median. A plain green shrub mass
would provide a solid backdrop accentuating the color of the flower
beds.
Trees planted within medians provide shade from the heat and glare
of roadways. Trees also define the roadways channeling the vehicle
through a space rather than across a flat sector of pavement.
Other amenities that help decorate landscaped areas are special
paving such as brick, colored concrete and bomanite.
These paving surfaces clean up edges, and keep maintenance for turf
areas to a minimum in an attractive way.
Planters for shrub masses and flower beds are commonly used to add
interest and give height, and they also break the monotony of
roadside plantings.
Decorative lighting is also an item that would give character and
identity to the medians within the City.
A myriad of possibilities exist for design of
t
h
e
s
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
.
Budget, safety, and maintenance concerns are factors that will influence the design of these areas.
LOCATION
Highly visible places for planting landscape
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
identified on a map. They have been broke
n
d
o
w
n
i
n
t
o
m
a
j
o
r
entrances into the city, major or visible i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
existing medians which could be landscaped.
The Minnesota Department of Transportation own
s
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
s
along 1494 and 212/169. They are responsible f
o
r
a
l
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
and maintenance to these highways. I was unabl
e
t
o
r
e
a
c
h
t
h
e
k
e
y
person to get preliminary approval, but in
m
y
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
s
t
h
e
following unofficial information and concerns w
e
r
e
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
:
. The median strips between the road sections in t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
a
r
e
u
s
e
d
as drainage swales during storms and are not av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
. If permission is granted to plant along some of
t
h
e
u
p
p
e
r
s
l
o
p
e
s
,
maintenance of these areas is the responsibili
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
. A concern was expressed as to how City crew
s
w
o
u
l
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
h
e
site. Due to the high speeds o these roadwa
y
s
,
c
a
r
s
a
t
s
l
o
w
speeds entering, exiting or working could caus
e
a
s
e
r
i
o
u
s
r
i
s
k
to health and property.
Hennepin County is responsible for two larg
e
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
medians occur. The first is Valley View Road
f
r
o
m
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
R
o
a
d
east to Highway 169/212. The second is Mitchell
R
o
a
d
f
r
o
m
V
a
l
l
e
y
View, south to Highway 5. I spoke to Dennis Han
s
e
n
w
i
t
h
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
County and he expressed the following thoughts
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
:
. Maintenance is currently the responsibility o
f
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
I
f
the City does any planting it would be up to the
C
i
t
y
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
the medians. The City would have to accept li
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
a
l
l
plant materials lost due to snow removal and s
t
o
r
a
g
e
,
s
a
l
t
a
n
d
chemical damage or accidents.
The County would not approve anything that wa
s
u
n
y
i
e
l
d
i
n
g
i
f
a
vehicle should jump a curve. Tree trunks an
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
would be examples of unyielding objects. Ha
n
s
e
n
s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
flowers or shrubs would be acceptable.
Site distance problems at intersections wo
u
l
d
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
adaressed so shrubs would not block views.
The City would have to go through a permit proc
e
s
s
,
b
u
t
h
e
d
i
d
n
'
t
see any reason it would not be approved if we
c
o
m
p
l
i
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
above concerns.
The City of Eden Prairie maintains the medians
a
l
o
n
g
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
Drive from Highway 5, south along the ring r
o
a
d
a
n
d
b
a
c
k
u
p
t
o
1 -
169/212, and also along Single Tree Lane. Ge
n
e
D
i
e
t
z
,
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
Public Works, expressed similar thoughts and they are as follows:
. Maintenance was his biggest concern an
d
h
e
w
a
n
t
e
d
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
Department to be responsible for maintena
n
c
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
t
replacement if any landscaping should occur
.
H
e
s
a
i
d
t
h
e
g
e
t
s
"lots of complaints about the maintenance of
t
h
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
s
t
r
i
p
s
and would be very glad for somebody el
s
e
t
o
a
s
s
u
m
e
t
h
e
headaches".
Most of the utilities are buried in the RO
W
,
b
u
t
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
be clear with the exception of electric wi
r
e
s
f
o
r
s
t
o
p
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
and storm sewer. He thought for the most pa
r
t
t
h
e
y
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
e
p
enough to not cause us any problems.
. Mr. Dietz stated he was not concerned wit
h
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
if the city was careful to avoid busy tim
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
a
y
t
o
service the medians.
Entrances to the City have been identified
o
n
t
h
e
m
a
p
.
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
entrances would be the MnDot Highways 494,
1
6
9
/
2
1
2
,
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
5
,
County Road 1, Dell Road, Eden Prairie
R
o
a
d
,
B
a
k
e
r
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
Anderson Lakes Parkway. These well travell
e
d
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
City are prime locations where landscaping c
o
u
l
d
o
c
c
u
r
t
o
a
n
n
o
u
n
c
e
Eden Prairie. County Road 18 is scheduled t
o
b
e
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
the next 5 years. This construction schedu
l
e
m
a
y
a
f
f
e
c
t
t
i
m
i
n
g
o
r
coordinating joint efforts.
Major intersections which are very visible o
r
h
e
a
v
i
l
y
t
r
a
v
e
l
e
d
h
a
v
e
also been shown on the map as possible
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
improvements.
Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works for
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
,
h
a
d
m
o
r
e
concerns with planting off the streets in th
e
R
O
W
a
r
e
a
s
t
h
a
n
i
n
t
h
e
medians. He said in order to keep costs do
w
n
,
m
o
s
t
C
i
t
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
only have a 50' ROW. The City also require
s
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
bury electric, telephone, and cable TV lines
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
With a typical road at 28' it only leaves 1
1
;
o
n
e
a
c
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
roadway to bury gas lines, electric lines,
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
,
c
a
b
l
e
T
V
and telephone lines. Underground utilities
w
i
l
l
b
e
m
o
r
e
p
r
e
v
a
l
e
n
t
at intersections where new subdivisions an
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
a
s
t
a
k
e
n
place.
City Code directs property owners not to in
s
t
a
l
l
p
l
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
within the City ROW to keep clear of all of
t
h
e
s
e
b
u
r
i
e
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Mr. Dietz also stated that visibility and
s
i
t
e
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
can occur when plantings are within the R
O
W
,
a
n
d
f
e
e
l
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
policy is a good one. A property owner can
p
l
a
n
t
a
t
r
e
e
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
property 11' from the roadway, which also
g
i
v
e
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
r
o
o
m
t
o
store snow without damaging trees.
Limited tree and shrub planting would still
b
e
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
a
s
l
o
n
g
as utilities and site distance are respecte
d
.
F
l
o
w
e
r
b
e
d
s
w
o
u
l
d
,
for the most part, not interfere with site
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Planters could also be utilized to keep clear of utility lines and to give intersections a more polished look.
COST AND MAINTENANCE
Due to the wide variety of design options and the different
s
i
z
e
s
of medians, the following cost projections are preliminary an
d
a
r
e
intended to give a ballpark estimate for comparison and discus
s
i
o
n
.
Further cost estimates need to be undertaken as the design
s
a
r
e
more finalized.
In order to facilitate discussion, I have broken the medians
d
o
w
n
into 4 categories to give estimated costs. The drawing sho
w
s
a
sample of what each category could look like. Please keep in
m
i
n
d
these are only possibilities and not the finished product. Br
o
k
e
n
down cost estimates are on the attached sheets, but bottom
l
i
n
e
costs for an average median of 13,000 sq. ft. are shown as foll
o
w
s
:
1. flowers only - $6,970 per median
2. flowers and shade or ornamental trees - $7,020 per median
3. trees, shrubs and flowers - $7,925 pr median
4. shrubs and flowers - $8,700 per median
For the most part estimated prices include labor for installat
i
o
n
.
Construction and landscape projects such as this are norm
a
l
l
y
contracted out due to the heavy work load of our City cre
w
s
.
T
h
e
flower planting will be an annual event and it is the onl
y
c
o
s
t
estimate that the .labor for the City crews have included. Two
estimates are listed for the City personnel. 4A is the co
s
t
f
o
r
seasonal help assuming $6 per hour. 4B is the cost of our
f
u
l
l
-
time help using the $6 per hour figure. In order to simpli
f
y
t
h
e
bottom line, I have used the seasonal help figure in the
t
o
t
a
l
since if this project were implemented, more seasonal people
w
o
u
l
d
be needed.
Maintenance cost have not been included in these cost esti
m
a
t
e
s
.
The cost of maintaining these medians will vary greatly dep
e
n
d
i
n
g
on what is planted, detailing and if the median is irrigated
.
COSTS FOR TREES AND SHRUB
Occasionally a shrub or tree will need to be replaced d
u
e
t
o
drought, snow storage, or salt damage, but the expense will n
o
t
b
e
incurred each year. Maintenance for trees and shrubs will re
q
u
i
r
e
daily or weekly waterings while the plants are young, but whe
n
t
h
e
plant is established and edging and mulch is used and pro
p
e
r
l
y
installed, maintenance costs are reasonably low and for the
m
o
s
t
part limited to weekly watering, weeding and litter pickup.
Annual flowers will be an ongoing yearly expense. Costs each
y
e
a
r
must include the price of the flowers, as well as labor cost
s
f
o
r
installation and maintenance. Mid May is the best time to p
l
a
n
t
annual flowers and unfortunately it is also one of the bus
i
e
s
t
times for our park maintenance crew. In order for this proje
c
t
t
o
be implemented and still get our
p
a
r
k
s
r
e
a
d
y
f
o
r
u
s
e
,
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
help must be obtained. Additional seasonal p
a
r
k
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
p
e
o
p
l
e
or contracted employees would be
r
e
a
l
i
s
t
i
c
,
s
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
project would probably be larger
t
h
a
n
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
s
w
o
u
l
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
a
k
e
.
Watering flowers is also labor
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
.
W
i
t
h
l
i
t
t
l
e
s
h
a
d
e
a
n
d
the heat from the surrounding
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
o
u
r
p
a
r
k
c
r
e
w
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
watering will be needed every o
t
h
e
r
d
a
y
u
n
l
e
s
s
r
a
i
n
i
s
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
t
.
The city has two water trucks,
w
h
i
t
h
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
u
n
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
can only be driven by full-ti
m
e
C
i
t
y
p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
a
t
t
h
e
$
1
6
/
h
o
u
r
labor rate. Our Park Manager est
i
m
a
t
e
d
$
1
0
p
e
r
1
0
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
r
1
3
1
per median for each time the fl
o
w
e
r
s
a
r
e
w
a
t
e
r
e
d
.
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
a
t
e
r
trucks are shared by the Park Dep
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
Use of the water trucks is not gua
r
a
n
t
e
e
d
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
w
h
e
n
C
i
t
y
street crews are seal coating ro
a
d
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
l
s
.
The City also have two pickup tr
u
c
k
s
w
i
t
h
t
a
n
k
s
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
h
o
l
d
2
5
0
gallons of water. These trucks
m
a
y
b
e
d
r
i
v
e
n
b
y
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
h
e
l
p
i
n
at the lower hourly rate, but it
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
m
u
c
h
s
l
o
w
e
r
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
d
u
e
limited capacity and pressure.
T
h
e
P
a
r
k
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
b
o
t
h
trucks would be in service the ma
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
i
m
e
i
f
a
l
l
t
h
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
are planted, removing two trucks
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
f
l
e
e
t
.
Other costs involved with flower
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
k
e
e
p
t
h
e
m
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
good, would include weeding,
r
e
m
o
v
i
n
g
d
e
a
d
f
l
o
w
e
r
h
e
a
d
s
t
o
stimulate blooming and litter re
m
o
v
a
l
.
Sod has also been included on t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
a
s
a
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
c
o
v
e
r
to break up flower and shrub
b
e
d
s
.
W
h
i
l
e
p
r
o
b
a
b
l
y
n
o
t
a
s
l
a
b
o
r
intensive as flowers, sod needs
t
o
b
e
c
u
t
,
t
r
i
m
m
e
d
,
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
e
d
t
o
keep it looking good. Mowing an
d
t
r
i
m
m
i
n
g
c
o
s
t
s
a
r
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
be $8 per 1000 sq. ft. using Cit
y
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
h
e
l
p
.
The costs that have been pres
e
n
t
e
d
t
h
i
s
f
a
r
a
r
e
c
o
s
t
s
f
o
r
a
n
average 13,000 sq. ft. median.
T
h
e
y
v
a
r
y
s
o
m
e
w
h
a
t
i
n
s
i
z
e
a
n
d
shape, but 34 medians exist wit
h
i
n
E
d
e
n
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
a
n
d
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
a
r
t
of an overall beautification s
c
h
e
m
e
.
C
o
s
t
s
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
b
e
l
o
w
f
o
r
each one of the 4 categories i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
.
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
include the following assumptio
n
s
.
F
l
o
w
e
r
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
i
s
d
o
n
e
w
i
t
h
full-time people and the City wat
e
r
t
r
u
c
k
3
t
i
m
e
s
p
e
r
w
e
e
k
f
r
o
m
M
a
y
1 to September 15th. Mowing is
d
o
n
e
w
i
t
h
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
p
e
o
p
l
e
o
n
c
e
a
week from April 8 to October 20
t
h
.
D
i
v
i
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
i
g
u
r
e
by 34 will give you the mainten
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
f
o
r
a
n
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
.
#1 Flowers
materials and labor
annual maintenance
#2 Flowers and trees
materials and labor
annual maintenance - water $226,
4
4
0
mowing $16,320
$236,953
267.240
$504,193
$238,572
242.760
$481,332
#3 Flowers Shrubs and Trees
materials and labor
annual maintenance
#4 Shrubs and Flowers
materials and labor
maintenance
$269,365
128,928
$398,293
$296,119.60
189,720.00
$485,840.60
The figures above present a more rea
l
i
s
t
i
c
v
i
e
w
o
f
c
o
s
t
s
t
o
d
o
a
l
l
the medians within the City. Main
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
a
r
e
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
yearly expenses. Once the project i
s
s
t
a
r
t
e
d
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
l
a
b
o
r
expenses are also ongoing expenses
w
h
e
n
f
l
o
w
e
r
s
a
r
e
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
design.
An irrigation system is something th
a
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
of this project. Although, init
i
a
l
l
y
v
e
r
y
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
,
t
h
e
installation of an irrigation syste
m
w
o
u
l
d
s
o
l
v
e
m
a
n
y
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
.
It would eliminate the availability
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
o
f
g
e
t
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
truck and leave the 2 pickup trucks
f
r
e
e
f
o
r
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
flowers within the parks system.
I
t
w
o
u
l
d
a
l
s
o
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
a
n
y
traffic hazards created by the water
t
r
u
c
k
a
s
i
t
i
s
p
a
r
k
e
d
n
e
x
t
t
o
the median or while accessing the sit
e
.
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
c
o
s
t
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
show a system would be approximate
l
y
$
5
0
0
p
e
r
1
0
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
t
o
irrigate, or about $6,550 for an
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
.
I
f
a
l
l
t
h
e
medians in town were done, $222,700
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
c
o
s
t
.
The payback period for only flowers
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
o
n
e
y
e
a
r
.
The payback time for flowers, trees
a
n
d
s
h
r
u
b
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
1
.
7
y
e
a
r
s
.
Other suggestions to cut down main
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
o
maximize the use of shrubs and trees
s
a
v
i
n
g
f
l
o
w
e
r
b
e
d
s
f
o
r
a
c
c
e
n
t
areas. The use of hard surface mate
r
i
a
l
s
a
r
o
u
n
d
s
i
g
n
p
o
s
t
s
w
o
u
l
d
save weekly trimmings. Techniques su
c
h
a
s
w
e
e
k
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
f
e
r
t
i
l
i
z
e
r
,
edging and mulch can also greatly cu
t
d
o
w
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
This project has the potential to ma
k
e
o
u
r
c
i
t
y
a
t
r
u
l
y
b
e
a
u
t
i
f
u
l
city. Virtually everyone driving b
y
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
i
c
e
o
u
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
medians. This project also has the
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
b
e
a
r
e
a
l
s
o
u
r
c
e
of complaints, if initial design and
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
r
e
n
o
t
w
h
a
t
t
h
e
public expects to see. Whatever th
e
C
i
t
y
d
o
e
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
d
o
n
e
w
e
l
l
and taken care of properly in or
d
e
r
t
o
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
g
o
a
l
s
o
f
beautifying the City of Eden Prairie
.
There are two ways to begin a proj
e
c
t
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
objectives of the Commission and
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
.
T
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
i
s
t
o
d
o
a
large area very simply such as trees
i
n
t
h
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
increase plant materials as money is avail
a
b
l
e
.
T
h
e
o
t
h
e
r
o
p
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
implementation is to take a small are
a
a
n
d
f
o
c
u
s
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
m
o
n
e
y
o
n
an area that shines. The first schem
e
w
o
u
l
d
m
a
k
e
a
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
n
a
large number of people due to the a
r
e
a
t
h
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
v
e
r
.
The second scheme would make a large i
m
p
a
c
t
o
n
a
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
people because it is limited in on
l
y
o
n
e
a
r
e
a
.
B
o
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
strategies have merit. Consistency i
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
w
i
l
l
be crucial to keep the project tied to
g
e
t
h
e
r
.
One suggestion, if the Commission w
a
n
t
s
t
o
p
u
r
s
u
e
t
h
i
s
,
i
s
t
o
select the intersection of County Road
4
a
n
d
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
.
T
h
e
entire western half of this highly vis
i
b
l
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
owned by the City. If money is avai
l
a
b
l
e
,
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
c
o
u
l
d
a
l
s
o
b
e
developed.
QUESTION THE COMMISSION AND COUNCIL
S
H
O
D
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
A
R
E
:
Location of Improvements
1. Where are the improvements going to
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
?
M
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
or intersections?
2. Should the project be phased? What a
r
e
a
s
a
r
e
m
o
s
t
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
and would give the most impact for t
h
e
d
o
l
l
a
r
?
Design Concerns
1. Which option (1-4) is best for the
C
i
t
y
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
a
l
l
factors?
2. Are there some options not shown whic
h
w
o
u
l
d
w
o
r
k
b
e
t
t
e
r
?
Budget Concerns
1. Where will the funding come from?
2. Who will organize funds from business
l
e
a
d
e
r
s
?
3. How much money is needed or availabl
e
?
Safety and Maintenance Concerns
1. Should the City pay to irrigate the
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
?
2. Should the City allow trees (unyield
i
n
g
o
b
j
e
c
t
s
)
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
islands?
BPC:mdd
VP ,c),3 5Lim1:126
1 LANn<Lepr-,74462A 4N1
•
5.
MADE BY 151.r../
I
DATE 10-Z.5 -PS. .ice NO
pram= =IV:II:Amor neat, CHECKED BY DATE SEC SHT NO
CALCULATIONS FOFI'AVEc?-tV E.: FAF DIAN]
C. wp.‘11.01I10,1
Of Item
Number
Item Dlon esat:m
and Unit at MOM. UNIT
l.,i,,,,....., i.-a c tO s ? N. W, m U, Pr es Amotint
5') ---v- Dollars Cents Done: Centt
I
e.tr-I) PPZ lEt4X67110N
.
(o" Dir -
s p 1 o
.D , 00
Z
FE ..,wii Li 2/::„ ---' tre./loonsF wm-i 14.k.wc) Fvor.,E:c.t-s-r- spp.EA cEp._ t-16F
1.1.:30
4- 00
..--- ..--- fLou,7::
12(0 FLA- i s p -is-0/Fti,r- visF-
12),100 cio c4-' ?.-.. P:75-1
11.)s-TAL.4.4.-noN 6E-A50,,,,,.., 5.-o-1A-
ik_RA/RAT Ktumes PP_EPLAYtor , Iv--- Y4 loo
,------------------'
'".' 14-14- 8° r
del-f
4,- ih.K.7714-4-4,110N
FutA.,-ru,,z-4.1(.0-ii-tr-
mp: s 00 zoo Cc, (40 co 5 00
S
FALL CLEANIu p
fa.ci-F-4.f.) 4 2E-MOVed ce@is
cvr ibezs
l'ISF
1
,---------------:
44, SEA.SoN).6.,L, 1--kF-LP
/1000 sF
4E-)
`V-704--/1000 I
,....------
_ C0
4-ID cf 44- Fop. cosr
CO. Nucl.. whoo60. 91344241111
'oe .0v trIr7.4 G1T-err-
MADE BY DATE 1077r-7.-PP jos No
CIrr °Prom CHECKED BY DATE SEC. SHT NO
MO OM PINBAR11110110
1001 woosp. IMO
CALCULATIONS FOR 4VErr?,44 1 )-4FI'Di t>").
L ..tecification
Of tarn
Number iteT 0 efatOtian
and Unit at Measure UNIT
r •c%)..c 'c ,'''
? ale ;„Cr,
Unit Price I AfriOunt
C19 ‘... Donart Cents Dalian 1 Cents
I
6r-rE, PRE-pAPA.•110:,1 ReMovu-rup-P (-Mu, Laic- b" DEF_P 1,,14_,F 13.1
2-0 c'‘' 2 Go a OtC:i
Z.
yl Zoe,
FEEL/ I COOC7" wi -n-i 4-14140 bgnApckscr. splrim--)Er?. )-15P p,,/
4- 'c' S2, 'i-a
....----."----'''.-- r,-
5
FLOWE-;•r_
-= a" PAc..41. Ilse I 1,1
170 oo ZcICI 1 c"2
4- 44, INI"..1-A1701.1
.h.Sor.)A(..- ilsp 1 06 co
Q.
I ic i b 8o r
i. Fou_limi...
_ 2.60 Iloo .0
,4..4D E. 117-f-es 1 " Pb4 PJ 11.10-0061-2 11n1577\ttisaloN -E'A` 1_41(-;)A1111 ZOO 00 2,000 00
_
b a) D
Ihr_C-UDEL Itqs-rAuATIcA I\A"P.
2-0
22.2 4-4-4 40
Ry.,,fer+Lii.E.A.w—
4-'1e x N z. 7 p.):&11n1C...
70 la ;5 00
,-----------------;_,_,
--r,- / 3 n 0 -.:)---)
____.-------..
J0811V C- avEr.
Or1ICtIl
FPO II DIN NI•MI .0n0 11301 1.11M1r.6000 WILMS
MACE BY DATE 10-2Fr‘C) JOB NO
CelECKED BY DATE SEC SNT NO
CALCULATIONS FOR ‘‘Art/EFALle kle.C 2 AsJ 17D I rsn
lik pecificatIon
or Item
Nuntber Item Oescrlonon
end Unit ot Measure UNIT
n. .."1-
itt•-• t4 .te Unit Prtee Amount
•tt.''. D0113IT Cents Dollar: Cents
1
1-,ITE. 1-1P-E. pv--opATI
gEMoiEd -rug*, c Ti Li,
SDI L. &," DEEF !ASP
7-
co
,--"'----'-------'.-
Z.-
F-Fn LA LE,
7 U65/loorD CP vi I ni 'riAt.)(:)
R)124ACCAsr 5 F'-p-E-Apz fa
msF. 17D. I 00
r-,2. 40
RCN./E-S
ey, sPAC-I NV1
MCf
---
270 e° 'bo7.- 4°
4A*.
it,157--Ast_LA-noN+ .%iss_coN1,64._.
IsiSF
1, a
105 6°
t PL."
4- !WS-rt. LA,ATI 0 N
ti..X.LTIME... cry HP
6-1126F- " Ppc P
inr_LuDec (5 2r-o `'`) I la oo 00
lo
cEc. 6-,Fvel,s V ax.11-414wHz- INI5rm-L.A.Tror3 INIcLu OW i lb
I I 00 i 96D 00
7
i-4(20P..c.. 4 '
114s-r-AL-L-60-101.3 I Nr_Lopct.-., (Go
z5 00 eloo ea
1 111 -15
9
LLNIuscApE, Ercriihic,
ru-11.7,71-1 I'LT-_.; 17.. 4Y8 Y /3z. ,-, LP i uz° 70 7 I
iluv_i-t- 6.-F 12.--2.
7,922 =_.• i
DATE 'Z JC8 N.0
DATE SEC. SNT NO
CALCULATIONS FOR italE,FA tff - icy) <-P
CITY Off ICU
11150 EOM ...IF Risen
JOB ELOIALC,..g-
MADE BY
CHECKED BY
ilkedeetficadon
Of HIT
Ntenteet Item Description
end Unit ot Measure UNIT
...-cUPtc
1:•''' olo ..t`, Linn Price Amount
cso
'IV-. Donors Cents Dotty: Cents
1
'61 .11.:3 N,46c110N1
?CIAO TUFF ' -nu- t,,,,, MSP
I t
zo .vo
2.62... co
Z., r7LJT-27,k/T-01.2.--)0, sP \ A.) ST rt i-t7\111;) ll'axeccd\ sr SpaEADE?.. M r ' 2' '' 4.. 0.
b
RowEi-d.:
g" sPAct141 t%F. .c. 7o °° 00
*-
4 A
INI STAWAT1 oh!
‘-k."soNllv-- 1,4sF 5.4- tog c":' eacl- 00 , if
9'.
\1.-1-713-LAT10\1
fau -ri me.. 5.5 MSF
r i
e
i-k-IaLiw...4) (.,' py-ro
&6• .1L' b5 °° coo ''''' 4--kFL)F.-,s col.t , 9,:go
00 415o °`3
-7 c.-`,542r5s7."-, et4s,t INicl.,00,-Ls 6VANJULAe. trx,sE_ Z 9J 00
B moLL4-%
ps DP
c. 1525
..---
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission
THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation Natural
Resources
FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape ArchitectAVI
DATE: November 15, 1989
SUBJECT: Follow-up to Landscape Medians
Staff has done another cost estimate for medians using
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
sod and planting salt tolerant shade trees 25' on cente
r
.
T
w
o
c
o
s
t
estimates sheets are attached. One includes the cost
f
o
r
i
r
r
i
g
a
-
tion, the second includes maintenance costs for wat
e
r
i
n
g
.
B
o
t
h
estimates include mowing and trimming costs for ea
c
h
g
r
o
w
i
n
g
season.
A typical median is 800'. At a spacing of 25' on cent
e
r
3
0
t
r
e
e
s
would be needed for an average median. The estimated c
o
s
t
f
o
r
3
0
balled and burlapped trees is $200 per tree installed,
o
r
$
6
,
0
0
0
for 30 trees.
Mowing will be a yearly maintenance expense.
For estimating purposes, I have made the following assumptions. Mowin
g
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
done with seasonal people calculated at $8 per 1000 sq.
f
t
.
o
r
$
1
0
5
per median per mowing.* Costs for 28 mowings are $2,940
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
.
Watering trees can be done in two ways. The first is an
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
system. An estimated cost for an irrigation system for
a
n
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
median is $6,550. This is a one time expense for th
e
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
installation. Watering can also be done with the City c
r
e
w
s
u
s
i
n
g
a water truck. The following assumptions were made
f
o
r
c
o
s
t
estimates. Water truck would be used once a week with
f
u
l
l
-
t
i
m
e
personnel. Costs are estimated to be $10 per 1000 sq.
f
t
.
,
o
r
a
$130 per watering. The watering season would be approxim
a
t
e
l
y
f
r
o
m
May 1 through September 15th. Total watering costs for
t
h
e
s
u
m
m
e
r
would be $2,600. Watering in this fashion would be nece
s
s
a
r
y
o
n
c
e
a week while the trees are young and then subsequent
l
y
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
on weather.
Start up costs for this landscape improvement progr
a
m
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
$11,540* for a system with our City crews doing the w
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
,
o
r
$15,490 for a median with an irrigation system. Yearly
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
costs for the irrigated system would just be mowing a
n
d
t
r
i
m
m
i
n
g
for about $2,940 per year. Maintenance costs without an
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
system would be $2,940 for mowing and
$2,600 for watering, for a total of $5,550. Again, this watering would be necessar
y
w
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
trees are young, and dependent on weather thereafter.
Costs for shade trees in the medians along Prairie C
e
n
t
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
from Valley View Road to 169 have been calculated ba
s
e
d
o
n
4
8
0
0
linear feet. Initial costs with an irrigation system for the entire project would be $92,940. Maintenance costs for mowing and
trimming for the entire project would be $17,640 per year. Project
costs for the landscaped medians not including irrigation would be
$69,240. Maintenance costs for mowing, trimming and watering would
be $33,240 per year.
If the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission decides
to go ahead with this project, thought should be given as to how
this plan will be implemented. Questions for discussion might be:
1. What are the next steps in the process?
2. Who will coordinate the project?
3. Who will contact private businesses, clubs, etc.?
4. How will money accounts be set up for donations?
*28 mowings will be required if the medians are mowed once a week
from April 8-October 20th.
BL:mdd
JOB
ET IQ ' CC-
MADE BY r•Ve 1 DATE )."-,./319 JOB No
SEC. SPIT NO
CALCULATIONS POP ,.."1.1.(;?..(1. on cu:Prtcy. e;cd
Gr ederr - pram= 0#1.15 CHECKED BY DATE MI (DIM 1.0.041( PO.
[DM mi.<101.11047.1.
IL .Afelfication
or imm
Plumper Item Descrootion
600 Unit of Measugo
UN I T ›-C• &TA ' alp Unit Pr re Amoun t
DoNri Cents Caller: Coral b' Pd tb OkAIDE;Tr--et--
&zr -Itur_pest4T os14-rAuagra4 NaLsa. E,t, 260 °`' (cCX.0 co
.----'-'----------- HONV °411'11 #gra_ ik.6,-Ccr to TT 4F A NAL- i--4- HD Vol t tX:iry c',P 1 0 r? . 2940 co
,---
b
SiaPi&-k-riot 4.-.
3I-isrALLN-ry,,a 16F._ cy 0 60650 DO
WITIA1_, :'-c -r' 16,420.00 (
/
Ys-AFt4 Cs::izr- Z910 c''
„---------------;
...--------
----------------
..--------------'
.----------------
-4
-cnif.-rwc, expeNis-E.,
_
t 1-1,0.)j
Oft 0,0.3 CHECKED BY CATS SEC. SHT NO
OEN PRAIR11
COL! P/1n1011f MINN. so. AM Me
CALCULATIONS poRb1/4.sro _rt.) kiErAANJ
JOB 1...A1,1C4CAGCO V\f-CLACn14-
SAAOE er DATE 11 - ,P16-) jC8 NO
Specification
Or I ieln
Nurnoer l tern Osscriotoon
and Unit of Nitezatt• UNIT
,..0;nSt c \ ... thIlt P,,Cg A1710n111t
G7•77 ,......•
- ,7747‘. Canes Cents 00111,1 Cents b" Pf.A.e2 -- -VAC:Xi-WE-E.
44.L1-171Epo.11 rtslisu-csa2-1,1 -rxt.
tk,
Zco 00 Gcco oro
I./sow er , wi
L e -ocrbFY-F. zo dlEA&A, .4_4FLID el/icy-r) c.f
LA lo 2940
It ,--- '6TE1324Nt:)
crtY VJekTefl -roc tAucer— 4--5,k- scvloon 4-4--- .8. lb:3 Pcf WATEAr4c,t 1
V....A ZO
,------
130
( .-------
)
------"------
_.---''.------
..------"----A
------"-------
C. ..(.
wt.4.-P)E., 1.1F.W-21" CW-C-K-vJag--;::. ..:epreNDEWT" vs) -,NE/smr42. s.z..rptx)
m tsi Ti-} yoopski 17.E.Es so
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989
-8-
VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF
A. Reports of Landscape Architect
1. Landscaping and Flowers for Medians
Refer to memo dated October 31, 1989 from Barb
Cross, Landscape Architect.
Cross said she toured the landscaped medians in
the Twin Cities area prior to doing her report.
She said that flowers provide the biggest accent,
shrubs provide screening and vertical relief to
the flatness of the road, trees provide shade and
prevent glare. Special paving and decorative lighting
can also be used.
In discussions with MnDot, Cross was told that
median strips between road sections are used as
drainage swales and are not available for landscaping.
Maintenance is the responsibility of the City and
they had a concern with the crews accessing the
site because of the high speeds of traffic on these
roadways.
Hennepin County said that the City would be
responsible for any damage that occurred due to
snow or salt and they could not approve anything
that is unyielding to a vehicle, i.e. tree trunks
and lights. Site distance problems at intersections
would also have to be addressed.
The Public Works Department said that maintenance
is their biggest concern. Medians should be clear
for landscaping and he was not concerned with
maintenance vehicles working in these areas if
they avoid the busy times of the day.
The major intersections into the City which should
be considered for landscaping are 494, Hwys. 169/212,
Hwy. 5, Co. Rd. 1, Dell Road, Eden Prairie Road,
Baker Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway.
Planting in the right-of-way is not recommended
except for shrubs and flowers or possibly planters.
Cost estimates are as follows: flowers only $6970;
flowers and trees $7020; trees, shrubs and flowers
$7925; shrubs and flowers $8700. These cost are
per median and include installation and labor.
An average median is 1800 long and 13,000 sq.
ft.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. .4 NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989
-9-
Baker asked how much of the cost is labor. Cross
said that if seasonal help is used, the cost would
be about $1500 and if full time help is used, the
cost would be about $4000.
Cross added that the initial cost is more for trees
and shrubs; however, this is not a cost that is
incurred every year. Flowers are an ongoing expense
and would have to be replaced annually.
Cross said that two water trucks are shared by
the Park Department and the Street Department and
can be driven by full time personnel only at a
cost of $16 per hour. Use of these trucks is not
guaranteed. There are also two pickup trucks with
water tanks that can be driven by seasonal help,
but watering would be done on a much slower basis.
Other costs involved with flowers include weeding,
removing dead flower heads and litter removal.
There are 34 medians in the City. Total costs
for all medians are: flowers only $504,193; flowers
and trees $481,332; flowers, shrubs and trees 8398,293
and shrubs and flowers $296,120. Cross added that
an irrigation system should also be discussed at
a cost of $6550 per median or a total of $222,700
for all medians.
Cross felt that there were two ways to start a
landscaping project. One is to do a large area
very simply and the other is to do a small area
very well. Staff's suggestion is to start with
the intersection of Co. Rd. 4 and Valley View Road
near Pound Lake Park.
Cook said he does not agree with starting in Round
Lake Park.
Lambert commented that Barb's report was not meant
to discourage the landscaping project, but rather
to advise the commission what expenses would be
involved. He added that the City Council is looking
at cutting back the budget and does not know how
they would feel about a project of this type.
He agrees that one area should be done initially
to see what the reaction is and whether any local
businesses would be willing to fund it.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989
-10-
Mikkelson commented that he did not think the
suggestion was to do the project on such a large
scale.
Baker said he feels the City Council should be
approached with the suggestion. He has discussed
the project with several people and one idea was
to have a contest in 5 to 10 locations perhaps
with materials donated by the City and have civic
organizations either provide the labor or donate
money for the project.
Lambert said that in speaking with the City Manager,
using volunteers or civic organizations would be
working in a median would be a liability concern.
Baker said that perhaps the City could ask for
contributions and erect a plaque announcing the
sponsor.
Lambert suggested planters at intersections because
of all the underground wiring in these locations
for traffic signals, etc.
Cross said she hesitates to provide a landscape
in plan for intersections because they are all
so different.
Cook said he feels that residents of Eden Prairie
will be of the opinion that funds should be used
for other purposes rather than landscaping.
Richard said he feels that Prairie Center Drive
from Rainbow to Lunds is an important area to consider
landscaping for three reasons: many businesses
are located in this area, there is a good deal
of traffic and there are large medians to work
with. He said the landscaping should be kept very
simple and done completely through donations.
Joyer commented that residents took notice of the
flowers that were planted at Staring Lake. She
felt that landscaping should begin at Round Lake
or Riley Lake, but is in favor of the idea.
Helling said she feels that the intersection by
Round Lake Park would be an ideal location to begin.
She felt that either the Lions Club or Optimists
Club might be willing to fund it.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989
-11-
Mikkelson agreed and added that a plaque showing
the sponsors of the landscaping would be seen easily,
as many people walk in this area.
MOTION: Richard moved to recommend that the
landscaping project in Eden Prairie begin by planting
trees along the boulevard 30 from center on Prairie
Center Drive from Valley View Road to Hwy. 169
and that Barb Cross bring designs and costs for
this project back to the commission with the objective
that the City spend no money.
On call for discussion, Cook said that he feels
landscaping at Round Lake Park should be done
separately regardless of the decision made on
landscaping in other areas of the City.
Karpinko seconded the motion and it passed 5-0.
B. Reports of Manager of Recreation Services
1. Adaptive Recreation Program Update
Refer to memo dated October 30, 1989 from Beth
Timm, Adaptive Recreation Supervisor.
Beth reported that the adaptive recreation program
was begun 18 months ago and includes both segregated
and integrated programs. She showed the commission
a slide show on highlights of the program during
the summer. 103 children participated in the program,
8 of them from Eden Prairie. Eden Prairie is the
newest member of the cooperative program which
also includes Bloomington, Edina and Richfield.
Some activities included in the program are
playground, art camp (Edina), swimming lessons
and teen center (Bloomington).
2. Youth Athletic Association Appreciation Dinner
Belling said that a recap of the event and expenses
involved were included in the packets. 135 people
were invited and 68 attended. 16 businesses donated
door prizes valued at $450 for the event. Expenses
included $400 for Mark Rosen as the speaker, printing
costs, a plaque for each of the athletic association
presidents, supplies, hors d'oevres and dinner
which were contracted with the school district.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources*
DATE: June 26, 1990
SUBJECT: Trails and Sidewalk Policy
Members of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
suggested the Commission and the Council discuss the policy on
where the Commission should be recommending the installation of
trails and sidewalks when reviewing development proposals. The
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission generally
follows the guidelines approved in the Park and Open Space System
Plan that recommend the construction of 8' asphalt trails along
collector streets and minor arterials.
"The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department has
recommended requiring developers to construct 8' wide asphalt hike-
way/bikeways along collector streets that will generate sufficient
traffic to warrant concern for either pedestrian or bicycle use
within the road right-of-way. City staff has recommended that
developers be required to construct sidewalks along those resi-
dential streets that can accommodate bicycle traffic, but would be
hazardous for pedestrian use, and along both sides of all streets
within the MCA commercial area. In situations of heavy bike and
pedestrian traffic, the City may require an 8' wide bituminous bike
trail on one side of the street, and a 5' concrete sidewalk on the
opposite."
This issue is suggested for discussion because there seems to be
some inconsistency between the recommendations of the Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and that of the
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission tends to recommend
the installation of concrete sidewalks on both sides of most
streets, with the exception of cul-de-sacs.
Although the recommendation of constructing a sidewalk on both
sides of the street eliminates the argument as to which side of
the street the sidewalk should be placed, and provides equal access
to a safe pedestrian trail from both sides of the street, that
recommendation does depart from the historical philosophy that the
City would only be recommending the construction and maintenance
of the least amount of trailways and sidewalks necessary to provide
safe pedestrian and bicycle access to the "spine trail system".
If the Council prefers sidewalks on both sides of the street wher-
ever sidewalks are recommended, the Council should consider expand-
ing the required right-of-way along those streets from 50 to 60
feet in order to accommodate sidewalks on both sides, as well as
utilities that must be placed in the right-of-way.
BL:mdd
sidewalk/10
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 1990 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL STAFF:
Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris,
Patricia Pidcock, and Douglas Tenpas.
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly,
Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation and Natural Resources Robert Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and
Recording Secretary Rebecca Brazys.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Mayor Peterson and Councilman Pidcock were absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
MOTION:
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to approve the agenda as published.
AMENDMENTS .
Jullie stated due to the absence of two Council members, the Council
could not take action on the public hearing items under Section IV of
the agenda. He recommended these items be continued to the next
regular meeting. Staff had called and advised the proponents and as
many property owners as possible.
Tenpas requested that Item X-A.3 be added relating to rescheduling the
first meeting in July.
Motion to approve the agenda as amended carried unanimously.
II MINUTES
A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 5, 1990
MOTION:
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to approve the minutes of the City
Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 5, 1990 as amended. Motion
carried unanimously.
AMENDMENTS
Page 9, change the second sentance of the second paragraph of the
second motion to read: He would like the developer's agreement to
include that at a future date the developer will participate with
the City and the Watershed District for some kind of development of
that area, and that there will be an irrigation system in all the
berms.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -2- JUNE 19, 1990
III. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
B. Final Plat Approval of Bentec Addition (located at the northwest
corner of Yorkshire Lane and Pioneer Trail) Resolution No. 90-160
C. Approve TH 212 EIS Supplemental Agreement No. 3 (Resolution No.
90-169)
D. Approve Plans and Specifications for Utility and Street
Improvements in Bluffs East 7th Addition, IC 52-197 (Resolution No.
90-163)
E. Approve Plans and Specifications for Community Center Trunk
Watermain Improvements, IC 52-188 (Resolution No. 90-164)
F. Resolution Clarifying Which Persons are Entitled to Workers
Compensation and Rescinding Resolution No. 89-60 (Resolution No.
90-168)
G. Approval of Personnel Policy (Resolution No. 90-170)
Jullie explained the copy of the new Personnel Policy received by
the Council reflected the changes as underlined. Under Section
10.3, the bottom line was underlined, but was actually a part of
the current policy that was inadvertently omitted from the new
publication. Sections 10.5 and 10.6 related to disciplinary and
dismissal procedures. He explained staff thought it would be more
appropriate to not lock into any particular procedure, thus
allowing for a case-by—case determination of appropriate actions,
particularly in the case of a dismissal.
Tenpas referred to Section 10.7 and asked if an exit review would
be conducted and if Jullie would be consulted prior to dismissal.
Jullie responded there would be a hearing process, an exit review,
and the only time he would not be involved was if a temporary
employee were dismissed.
MOTION:
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to approve Items A through G on the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -3- JUNE 19, 1990
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE by Holtze Brothers Development Company.
Request for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers
on 5.6 acres, Zoning District Change from Office and C-Reg to
C-Reg-Ser on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres, and
construction of a 220-unit hotel development. Location: Southwest
corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle. (Ordinance No.
23-90-PUD-10-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-165
- Preliminary Plat).
MOTION:
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to continue the public hearing for
Holtze Executive Residence to the July 10 meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. VILLAGE KNOLLS by Argus Development. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 42.7 acres, Planned Unit Development
District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres, Zoning District
Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 8.7 acres. Preliminary
Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single-family lots, 2 outlots and road
right-of-way for a residential development. Location: East of
Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive. (Resolution No. 90-166 -
PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90 - PhD District and
Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-167 - Preliminary Plat).
MOTION:
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to continue the public hearing for
Village Knolls to the July 10 meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
C. BENTEC by Bentec Engineering Corporation. Request for Zoning
Trian-ct Amendment and Site Plan Review within the Office Zoning
District on 1.85 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board
of Appeals for construction of a 1900 square-foot addition to the
Bentec Engineering building. Location: 13050 Pioneer Trail
(Ordinance No. 24-90 - Zoning District Amendment).
MOTION:
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to continue the public hearing for
Bentec to the July 10 meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
I t.00
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -4- JUNE 19, 1990
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION:
Tenpas moved, Harris seconded to approve the payment of claims.
Motion carried on a unanimous roll call vote.
VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petition from Eden Prairie Citizens Affected by Western, North Lake
Riley, Residential Segment for TH 212 and request for Council to
review the need for better communication of City matters.
Jullie stated a petition with 62 signatures was received requesting
a public hearing for the purpose of the Council reconsidering its
prior determination of its preference for the North Lake Riley
alignment for Hwy. 212. The petition also requested the Council
"review the need for better communication of City matters with the
citizens of Eden Prairie".
With respect to the first item, Jullie explained that MnDOT
officials had agreed to study the property owners' questions by
holding another public informational meeting with the residents
involved to receive input, review that input and hold another
meeting to address those concerns. MnDOT's proposal may allay the
residents' concerns as to what impact the proposed alignment would
have on their properties. Jullie believed it would be
inappropriate and premature at this point for the Council to
consider reversing its prior approval of the preferred North Lake
Riley alignment as all the planning work done in the southwest
corridor had been predicated on this proposed alignment. All the
City's efforts since 1986 had been to promote the earliest possible
construction of TH212 on this preferred alignment. If the Council
reversed its decision, Jullie was concerned that this may
jeopardize MnDOT's present commitment to program funds for this
project in 1993. Jullie also stated many homeowners made property
purchase decisions based upon the City's preferred North Lake Riley
alignment. He added the staff had not seen any evidence of adverse
environmental impact that could not be mitigated. He pointed out
that the preferred alignment information had been on file with the
City since 1984.
With respect to the second item of the petition, Jullie responded
both the Eden Prairie News and the Eden Prairie Sailor regularly
reported the City Council actions. Also, anyone could request to
be placed on the mailing list to receive copies of the minutes.
Harris asked where the TH 212 project was in the lengthy planning
process. Jullie responded this project was in the Draft EIS
comment period.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -5- JUNE 19, 1990
Tenpas asked if there had been any land acquisition for right-
of-way. Dietz responded 3 parcels in the Wallace and School Road
neighborhood had been purchased; one home was purchased under
hardship provisions and the other 2 were vacant parcels purchased
to prevent development.
Harris asked who was the actual purchaser of those parcels. Dietz
explained the City of Eden Prairie received a loan from the
Metropolitan Council and when the right-of-way was sold to MnDOT,
the City would then reimburse the Metropolitan Council.
Harris asked which agency was the final authority in this matter.
Dietz responded the Commissioner of Transportation would make the
final alignment decision based on the Environmental Impact
Statement.
Tenpas stated he would like time to review the alternatives as he
was not on the Council when this matter was originally considered.
He agreed that the residents should have an opportunity to meet
with MnDOT with Council members also present. Harris agreed and
added the main issue was that the residents be able to participate
in a forum at which their comments would have the most impact.
Anderson commented that he would prefer not to take any action when
only thi"ee of the five Council members were present.
Tenpas stated in view of the communication concerns expressed by
the petitioners, it was time for the Council to again consider
cablecasting its meetings.
MOTION:
Tenpas moved, Harris seconded that the Council hold a neighborhood
meeting to include MnDOT, Council staff, and Council members.
Motion carried unanimously.
The Council recommended that the petitioners present hold their
comments until the neighborhood meeting, unless they had specific
questions. After some discussion, and in view of the number of
petitioners present, Council agreed to hear comments from a
spokesperson for the petitioners.
Sharon Hasslen, 15794 Village Woods Drive, representing the
petitioners, stated the petitioners would appreciate a forum where
they could address the current status of the neighborhood, the
wildlife, and Central Middle School, and how they would be affected
by the proposed TH 212 alignment.
Tom Meyer, 8579 Hiawatha Avenue, one of the petitioners, questioned
the Council's reluctance to hold an open discussion at that time.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -6- JUNE 19, 1990
Tenpas responded that if the Council opened the forum, the
discussion would have to be repeated when all Council members were
present. He believed everyone would be best served if the comments
were made at a meeting dedicated to this specific topic.
Anderson did not believe it would be fair for three Council members
to pass judgment or make decisions on such an important subject.
He also stated he needed the technical information on this issue
that MnDOT would provide.
John Carroll, 7950 Eden Court, stated this project had been
impacting his neighborhood for twelve years. He was concerned that
the petitioners' efforts would cause delays for the TH 212 project
and prolong the "stigma" that the TH 212 proposal had brought to
his neighborhood. He also stated that no matter where the road was
located, someone would be effected. He believed there had been
ample information available on this issue over the last few years.
Richard Beyer, 7917 Eden Court, expressed concern about the only
entrance to his neighborhood which could become blocked if an
emergency occurred at the filling station located at that entrance.
The Council asked that any further comments be held for the
neighborhood meeting.
VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
A. Waste Management Commission
Jullie stated the staff had recommended the Council delay any
action on the second reading of the proposed packaging ordinance at
least until the beginning of next year. He explained that State
legislation may preclude the need for the Council to take any
action.
MOTION:
Tenpas moved, Harris seconded to receive the Waste Management
Commission report. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -7- JUNE 19, 1990
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. Reports of Council Members
1. Set Joint Meeting with the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission.
MOTION:
Tenpas moved, Harris seconded to set the joint meeting with
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at
6:00 p.m., July 10 (prior to the Council meeting). Motion
carried unanimously.
2. Summer Vacation Schedule for Council Members
The Council requested this item be placed on the July 10
agenda.
3. Reschedule July 3, 1990 meeting.
MOTION:
Tenpas moved and Harris seconded to cancel the July 3, 1990
meeting and reschedule the first meeting of this month to July
10, 1990. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Report of City Manager
1. Excess Liability Coverage
Jullie reported Corporete Risk Management put together a report
which included the liability limits of other cities to provide
the Council a basis of comparison for Eden Prairie's million
dollar excess liability coverage.
After some discussion, the Council members decided they were
comfortable with the current coverage.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Harris moved, Tenpas seconded to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
July 10, 1990
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
TCM Construction, Inc.
CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY)
All-Square, Inc.
Broadbent Construction
Bud's Home Repairs
Cedarcraft Construction
Fox Fyre, Inc.
Hansen Hometech, Inc.
Madera Homes, Inc.
Pahl Construction
Rebel Builders
PLUMBING
Mike Larson Plumbing Co.
Oak Gorve Mechanical
Podany Plumbing
Robert Wyllie Plumbing
GAS FITTER
Andreasen Plumbing & Heating Co.
Suburban Air Conditioning
HEATING & VENTILATING
Eiden Bros.
Suburban Air Conditioning
ON SALE WINE & BEER
Somerset's Family Restaurant
GAMBLING CLASS A
C. B United, Inc. (at the Eden Prairie
Legion) with waiver of 60 day waiting
period.
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
Pat Solie
Licensing
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson
Authorize Issuance of Certificates for Radio Tower
DATE: July 5, 1990
Installation of the new emergency communications center by E. F. Johnson has
fallen a bit behind schedule. It appears that the system will be operational in
mid-August. During this extended installation process, staff and the
manufacturer have had an opportunity to do further analysis of the adequacy of
the radio tower for this system.
As explained in the memorandum from Support Services Manager Gary Tilt. .elsen,
there are several technical reasons for replacing the radio tower. In short,
the existing tower will not be capable of safely handling the full array of
antennas required for the system. This situation could be handled for a short
time (about a year), but would not be tolerated over a longer timeframe.
Accordingly, the Police Department has proposed $50,000 for the tower and
$10,000 in engineering fees in its 1991 budget request to the City Manage-.
Upon further analysis, the technical staff has pointed out several advantages to
begin installation in 1990. In addition to issues of the structural safety of
the existing tower are: minimizing the risks involved in switching towers and
the desirability of having the tower base installed before the ground freezes in
November. Problems will arise before and during the switch of towers due to the
improvised nature of the electrical engineering needed to make the existing
tower work. If the authorization for this work were not to take effect until
1991, the risk in communications operations would be extended approximately six
months.
Financing: Costs for the tower and its engineering are eligible to be financed
with Certificates of Indebtedness which may be issued for up to five years. If
the total $60,000 price were on certificates issued in 1990, the first
installment (payable in 1991) would be about $16,000. It may be possible to
reduce this obligation; all or part of the $50,000 cost for tower construction
may be deferred to 1991 depending upon the payment arrangement in the contract
for that work. E. F. Johnson had suggested that it might be willing to provide
funding until the City identified and authorized financing, but as of July 2
removed that offer.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the issuance
of $60,500 in Certificates of Indebtedness at this time for the engineering,
construction, and installation of a new radio tower for emergency services
communications.
CWD:jdp
Attachment
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 29, 1990
TO: Assistant to the City Manager Dawson
Through Chief Wall
FROM: Gary Therkelsen
SUBJECT: Radio Tower Replacement
HISTORY
In 1983, a light duty radio tower was installed at the police
department for the purposes of coordination with our
personnel and equipment as well as the Richfield PSAP.
Additionally, the tower was used in conjunction with
emergency operations center (EOC) radio equipment and a
control station for the Eden Prairie School bus radio system.
At the time of erection of the tower, it was fully loaded in
terms of it's ability to withstand imposed lateral loading.
No additional antennae may be installed on this structure
without extreme risk of collapse. Re-analysis of the tower
in 1985 indicated that the tower narrowly met the existing
standards. In fact, the tower does not meet current
standards for windloading and ice conditions presently
required in this state.
The existing tower was not designed to serve as a primary
communications antenna structure, but rather as a
supplemental and occasional back up to the primary
facilities. The tower was adequate for it's original
intended operation.
Earlier this year, E.F. Johnson and the City of Eden Prairie
entered into an agreement for the provision of a new radio
communications system, and the City took additional
significant steps toward the activation of a full service,
enhanced 9-1-1 public safety communications center.
During the design and engineering phases of the radio
communications project, it was determined that the existing
tower will not be capable of safely handling the full array
of antennas required for proper system operations. In
addition to the trunked radio system antenna, several other
new antennas are required for coordination radio systems
which are required for communications with other agencies and
personnel on a routine basis. Compromise configurations will
be used until the tower is replaced. Additionally, this
structure does not have adequate protection from lightning.
In order to provide appropriate levels of radio
Memorandum - Radio Tower
Page 2
communications and to minimize risks, it is imperative that
the radio tower be replaced as soon as possible.
Although the replacement of the radio tower is not included
in our agreement with E.F. Johnson, their representative
has indicated that E.F. Johnson may be willing to install a
new radio tower, deferring the cost until 1991. The police
department has requested $50,000 for tower replacement and
$10,000 for engineering in it's 1991 budget request for this
project. In the event that E.F. Johnson does replace the
tower, they would likely provide the engineering without
cost.
In the event that E.F. Johnson and the City do not agree to
early replacement as described above, the new system will be
installed in a compromise fashion, and it will not be
possible for the City to enjoy full benefit of the system, or
the use of necessary radio coordination systems until
replacement occurs. The importance of an adequate radio
tower cannot be overemphasized.
In any event, the tower replacement should occur only after
careful consideration of present and predictable future needs
as well as legitimate electrical and structural engineering.
gt
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-176
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR BOULDER POINTE TOWNHOMES
WHEREAS, the proposed sanitary sewer to be constructed in Boulder
Pointe Townhomes requires a connection to the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission (MWCC) interceptor system; and
WHEREAS, the proposed connection conforms to the Eden Prairie
Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
The City Engineer is here authorized and directed to submit an
application for "Permit for Connection to or Use of Commission
Facilities" to the Metropolitan Control Commission.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 19990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
1,)0')
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-172
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 8TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the plat of EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 8TH ADDITION has been
submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden
Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota
Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of
Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for EDENVALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 8TH
ADDITION is approved upon compliance with the
recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat
dated JULY 3, 1990.
B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd.
2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between
the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of
the final plat as described in said engineer's report.
C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and
subdivision of the above named plat.
D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City
Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on JULY 10, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT
TO: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members
THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician
DATE: July 3, 1990
SUBJECT: Edenvale Industrial Park 8th Addition
PROPOSAL: The owners, James Bergin and Commercial Land Five, Inc.,
have requested City Council approval of the final plat of
Edenvale Industrial Park 8th Addition. Located at the
northwest corner of Martin Drive and Corporate Way, the
plat contains 4.7 acres to be divided into one lot and
one outlot. Lot one contains 2.0 acres and is the
present site of Bergin Auto Body which was the site of a
recently adopted site plan approval. Outlot A is to be
retained by Commercial Land Five, Inc. for future
development purposes.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council in
1985 per Resolution No. 85-40.
This property was zoned 1-2 in 1969 per Ordinance No.
135.
This project received site plan approval through the City
Council July 11, 1989 per Resolution No. 89-119.
VARIANCES: Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd.
2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between
the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of
the final plat as described in said engineer's report.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways and
walkways necessary to serve this site dre currently in
place and utilized.
PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will conform to the requirements
of City Code.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Edenvale
Industrial Park 8th Addition subject to the requirements
of this report and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $470.00
JJ:ssa
cc: James Bergin
Ron Krueger & Associates
July 3, 1990
Mr. Alan D. Gray, P.E.
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Mitchell Road and Sandy Pointc Addition
Lc. 52-156
RCM Project No. 10030.02
Dear Mr. Gray:
Bids were opened on June 29, 1990 for the above referenced project. The low
bid for the project was submitted by Nodland Construction Co., Inc. in the
amount of $688,872.50. This is approximately 14% below the engineer's
estimate of $803,750.00 based upon the final design. The breakdown,
estimates and respective bids are shown below.
Project
Prelim. Est, Final Est
Mitchell Road
$608,100.00
$677,631.50
Sandy Pointe 107 900.00 126.117.25
Total
$716,000.00
$803,748.75
The difference between the bids and the final estimate for Mitchell Road
apparently was in a conservative estimate for deep sanitary sewer
construction and generally lower prices throughout the drainage, landscaping
and street work. The difference for Sandy Pointe Addition apparently was in
generally lower prices throughout the drainage, landscaping and street work.
Northdale Construction's bid was submittcd on the wrong bid form and was
not considered.
A summary of the eight bids received is attached. The number of bids and
the grouping of the lowest five bids indicate that the bidding process was
competitive and that rebidding this work would not likely result in lower bid
prices. We, therefore, recommend award to Nodland Construction Co., Inc. in
accordance with their submitted bid.
Mill
rieke
carroll
muller
associates, inc.
,ngineers
thitects
..ind surveyors
equal opportunfly
employer
Bid
$577,433.00
111.439,50
$688,872.50
William B. Cook, P.E.
RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
WBC/jj
Enclosures
10901 rod circle drive
box 130
rrunnetonka mtnnesota 55343
612-935-6901
SUMMARY OF BIDS
i.c . 52-156 and 52-201
DESCRIPTION: Mitchell Road and Sandy Pointe Addition
BIDS OPENED: June 29, 1990
CONSULTING ENGINEER: Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.
CHECKED BY: Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.
BIDDER
Nodland Construction Co., Inc.
Brown & Cris, Inc.
J.P. Norex, Inc.
Richard Knutson, Inc.
Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc.
Barbarossa and Sons, Inc.
G.L. Contracting, Inc.
BID SECURITY
5% Bid Bond
5% Bid Bond
5% Bid Cond
5% Bid Bond
5% Bid Bond
5% Bid Bond
5% Bid Bond
TOTAL AMOUNT
$688,872.50
$708,355.10
$708,795.35
$712,105.00
$727,217.26
$787,736.50
$818,607.94
The undersigned recommend award of Contract to:
Nodland Construction Co., Inc.
as the lowest responsibl; bidder for this Improvement Contract.
Consulting Engineer
William C. Cook, P.E.
Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.
- Alan D. Gray, p E-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-173
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 1310
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following
improvements:
Lc. 52-156 and 52-201
Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain and Street Improvements
Mitchell Road and Sandy Pointe Addition (RCM Project No. 10030.02)
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are
shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of contract to
Nodland Construction Co., Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into a contract with Nodland Construction Co., Inc.
in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $688,872.50
In accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the
Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on
Gary Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
SEAL:
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: David Lindahl, Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: July 2, 1990
RE: CDBG JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
The Joint Cooperation Agreement executed by and between Hennepin
County and the City of Eden Prairie to establish the Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant program expires October 1,
1990. For the City to continue its participation in the program,
it is necessary to execute a new agreement to cover the next three
years.
It is therefore necessary for the Council to act by resolution to
authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Joint
Cooperation Agreement. Action on the agreement at this time will
be binding for three years, and will make the City a partner in the
Urban Hennepin County CDBG program for federal fiscal years 1991,
1992, and 1993.
JointCop.DL:sg
CDBG
CITY OP EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEP/N COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION # 90-177
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie and the County of Hennepin
have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement, County Contract No.
70466, for the purposes of qualifying as Urban County under the
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community
Development Block Grant program: and
WHEREAS, the City and the County wish to terminate the current
Agreement and execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement, County
Contract No. A04780, to reconstitute Urban Hennepin County for
purposes of the Community Development Block Grant program.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City and the County, County Contract No. 70466, be
terminated effective September 30, 1990, and a new Joint
Cooperation Agreement between the City and the County, County
Contract No. A04780, be executed effective October 1, 1990, and
that the Mayor and the City Manager be authorized and directed to
sign the Agreement on behalf of the city.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 10th day of
July, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Nelson Addition
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #35-89
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the R1-22 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall
be, and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included
hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each
District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph
B, shall be, and are amended accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
3efinitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for
Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in
their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of July 10, 1990, entered into
between David Nelson, an individual, and the City of Eden Prairie, and that
certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's dated July 10, 1990, entered into
between Fleet Finance, a Delaware corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie,
which Agreement and Owner's Supplement to Agreement are hereby made a part
hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 19th day of September, 1989, and finally read and adopted and
ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on
the 10th day of July, 1990.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Exhibit A
Legal Description
That part of the East 445 feet of Lot 11, lying Southerly of Creekview Estates
and that part of the East 445 feet of Lot 12, lying North of the South 46 feet
thereof, EDEN PRAIRIE ACRES, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Nelson Addition
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1989, by
David Nelson, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from RI-22
to R1-13.5 on 2.41 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.41 acres into six lots and road
right-of-way for single family residential development, all situated in Hennepin
County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #35-89,
Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of
said property as foilows:
1. Developer shall develop the property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated September 14, 1989, reviewed and
approved by the City Council on September 19, 1989, and attached
hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as
provided herein. Developer shall not develop, construct upon, or
maintain the property in any other respect or manner than provided
herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by
Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of
all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in
Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Prior to release by the City of the final plat for the property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the
property.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
A
4. Prior to any "land alteration" as that term is defined in City Code
Chapter 11, Section 11.55, Developer agrees to apply to the City
Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a land
alteration permit for the property in accordance with said Section
11.55. The land alteration permit shall, among other conditions and
requirements, include mitigation of tree loss for 43 caliper inches
of trees.
5. Concurrent with street and utility construction on the property,
Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, a five-
foot wide sidewalk along the north side of the public street to be
constructed on the property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached
hereto. Developer agrees to construct said sidewalk in accordance
with the specifications for sidewalks as approved by the Director of
Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources and in accordance with the
terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit on Lot 1, Block 1, as
depicted in Exhibit 8, attached hereto, Developer agrees to provide
plans to the Director of Planning which indicate that the driveway
for said Lot 1, Block 1, shall be located along the south side of
the structure to be constructed thereon for purposes of providing
safe and adequate sight vision distance for street access from said
Lot 1, Block 1.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning of said plans, Developer
agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, those plans as
stated above, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance
with' the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
Nelson Addition
OWNERS SUPPLEMENT
TO
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
DAVID NELSON
AND THE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of
, 1990, by
and between Fleet Finance, a , hereinafter referred to
as "Owner," and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
For and in consideration of, and to induce, City to adopt Ordinance /35-89
changing the zoning of the property owned by Owner from R1-22 to R1-13.5, as more
fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of
, 1990, by and between David Nelson and City, Owner agrees with
the City as follows:
1. If David Nelson fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's
Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not
oppose the rezoning of the property to R1-22.
2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,
its successors, heirs, and assigns of the property.
3. If the Owner transfers such property, Owner shall obtain an
agreement from the transferree requiring that such transferee agree
to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
OWNER
FLEET FINANCE
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #90-162
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE #35-89 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance #35-89 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 10th day of
July, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance #35-89, which is attached
hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly
informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in
a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in
Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the
City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in
the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance #35-89 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20
days after publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 10, 1990.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
1 1.)-,2)\
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 35-89
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary L This ordinance allows rezoning of land located south of
Pioneer Trail, west of Sennett Place from the RI-22 District to the R1-13.5
District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement.
Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of
this property.
effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/ John D. Frane
City Clerk
/s/Gary D. Peterson
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
day of
, 1990.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
Boulder Pointe West Townhomes
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 922-90
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 MUCH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance
(hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be
removed from the R1-22 District and be placed in the RM-6.5 District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall
be, and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included
hereafter in the RN-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each
District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph
B, shall be, and are amended accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for
Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in
their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of
that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of July 10, 1990, entered into
between David Carlson Companies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and the City
of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its
passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie on the 5th day of June, 1990, and finally read and adopted and
ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on
the 10th day of July, 1990.
EXHIBIT A
Boulder Pointe Townhomes West
REZONING TO RM-6.5
That part of Outlot C, BOULDER POINTE, according to the recorded plat thereof
described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Outlot C; thence on an assumed
bearing of South 89 degrees 26 minutes 10 seconds West, along the north
line of said Outlot C, a distance of 123.68 feet; thence southwesterly,
a distance of 310.75 feet, along a non-tangential curve concave to the
southeast having a radius of 400.00 feet and a central angle of 44
degrees 30 minutes 42 seconds, the chord of said curve bears South 39
degrees 07 minutes 32 seconds West and has a chord dimension of 302.99
feet; to the west line of said Outlot C; thence South 0 degrees 21
minutes 21 seconds West, along said west line, a distance of 950.79
feet, to the southwest corner of said Outlot C; thence southeasterly,
along the southerly line of said Outlot C, to the southeast corner of
said outlot C; thence northerly, along the east line of said Outlot C,
to the point of beginning.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Outlot C, BCUUDER POINTE, according to the recorded plat thereof.
Boulder Pointe West
Townhomes
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1990, by DAVID CARLSON COMPANIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred
to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from
R1-22 to RN-6.5 on 8. 26 acres, Site Plan Review on 8.26 acres, and
Preliminary Plat of 8.97 acres into 31 lots, two outlots, and road right-of-
way for construction of 30 duplex units, all said 8.97 acres situated in
Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred
to as "the property:"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #22-90, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and
laintenance of said Property as follows:
1. Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the
materials revised and dated May 31, 1990, reviewed and approved by
the City Council on June 5, 1990, and attached hereto as Exhibit B,
subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
2. Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance
by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein
of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set
forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Concurrent with, and as part of, the final plat for the Property,
Developer agrees to provide to the City an easement for storm water
ponding purposes over the area designated for a retention pond in
the northwest portion of the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B,
attached hereto.
4. Developer acknowledges that the Property shall benefit from the
upgrading of Mitchell Road, adjacent to the Property. Developer
agrees, therefore, that prior to release of any final plat for the
Property, Developer shall submit to the City and obtain the City's
approval of an executed special assessment agreement for
Developer's fair share of the costs for improvements to Mitchell
Road adjacent to the Property, including street, utilities,
sidewalk, and trail construction costs.
5. Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water,
interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for
the Property. Developer acknowledges that the private street and
private utilities to be constructed on the Property, as depicted in
Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be designed to City standards.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or
cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said
plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit
C, attached hereto.
6. Prior to any construction or development on the Property, Developer
agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property.
7. Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction
on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building
Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of
detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading
plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include
details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method
of construction to be used for said retaining walls.
Upon approval by the Chief Building Official, Developer agrees to
construct, or cause to be constructed, said retaining walls, as
approved by the Chief Building Official, concurrent with the
grading, street, and utility construction on the Property, and in
accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached
hereto.
8. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the Property, Developer
agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the
Director's approval of the following:
A. A permanent irrigation plan for the Property which shall
provide for irrigation of the landscaping on the Property.
B. Documents creating a homeowners' association for the Property,
which provide for maintenance of common areas, including, but
not limited to, snow plowing, lawn maintenance, structural
maintenance, architectural continuity, etc.
C. Samples of exterior building materials to be utilized on the
structures of the Property, including colors and textures.
Such materials shall be coordinated with respect to colors and
compatible with colors and textures of materials implemented
on other buildings on the Property.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning, Developer agrees to
implement, or cause to be implemented, those plans, documents, and
materials, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance
with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
9. Developer and City acknowledge that it is the intention of
Developer to deed Outlots A and B, as depicted in Exhibit B,
attached hereto, to the adjacent land owners for purposes of
combination of said outlots with other lands for development in the
future. Developer shall not request, and City shall not issue, any
building permits for Outlot A or B.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #90-151
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OP ORDINANCE #22-90 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
WHEREAS, Ordinance #22-90 was adopted and ordered published at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 10th day of
July, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OP EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance #22-90, which is attached
hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly
informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in
a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in
Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for
inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the
City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in
the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance #22-90 shall be recorded in the ordinance book,
along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20
days after publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 10, 1990.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 22-90
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER i AND BECTION 11.99, MICR, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at the
northeast corner of Pioneer Trail and Spring Road from the R1-22 District to
the RM-6.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's
agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal
description of this property.
effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
ATTEST:
/s/ John D. Frane /s/Gary D. Peterson
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
, 1990.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-171
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ON THE PROPOSED FLYING
CLOUD AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, with the review of the Metropolitan Airports
Commission's Flying Cloud Airport Master Plan Update, major concern
was raised by the residents of this community regarding an increase
in aircraft noise associated with an expanded airport and,
WHEREAS, an effective noise abatement plan is essential to
controlling increases in aircraft related noise and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Flying
Cloud Airport Noise Abatement Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Eden Prairie City Council
finds the noise abatement plan not effective for the following
reasons:
1. The abatement plan relies completely on voluntary
compliance with no mandatory controls.
2. No noise monitoring system is proposed to ensure
complianbe with established noise thresholds.
3. No specific procedure to disseminate the abatement plan
to transient and non-local pilots has been established.
4. A preferred runway for jet aircraft of 9R/27L for
departing/arriving fliOtswillcreate increased aircraft
noise on east side of airport where housing density is
high.
5. A preferred runway for jet aircraft of 9P/27L for
departing/arriving flights may create an increased threat
for potential bird strikes over the Flying Cloud
landfill.
6. Higher pattern altitude may result in wider traffic
patterns affecting additional residents.
7. Maintenance run-ups are not restricted to the south side
of the airport where noise impacts would be minimal.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN
PRAIRIE: that the Metropolitan Airports Commission is encouraged to
reconsider adoption of the plan in its present form.
ADOPTED, by the City Council on the
day of
1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT
NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN
This noise abatement plan for the Flying Cloud Airport has bee
n
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
i
n
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
of the
need to make the airport and the surrounding community as e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
a
s
possible. The plan, as set forth here, is the culmination of a coo
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
a
i
r
p
o
r
t
users, airport businesses, the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Com
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
f
i
c
i
a
l
s
,
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
Aviation Administration representatives, and the Metropolitan Ai
r
p
o
r
t
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
Some of the recommended procedures outlined in the plan are c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
i
n
u
s
e
a
t
t
h
e
a
i
r
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
have proven effective in reducing airport related noise in the su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
T
h
e
i
n
t
e
n
t
of the noise abatement plan is to direct the bulk of the traffic ov
e
r
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
s
o
t
a
R
i
v
e
r
b
o
t
t
o
m
s
so as to reduce noise levels over the surrounding community. A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
w
i
l
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
compatibility by providing higher traffic pattern altitudes and el
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
u
n
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
over noise sensitive areas.
It should be kept in mind that this noise abatement plan is a c
o
m
p
o
s
i
t
e
o
f
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
b
y
w
h
i
c
h
aircraft operators are asked to comply. Certain flight conditions an
d
a
i
r
c
r
a
f
t
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
may make it unsafe to fly all or any part of these procedures.
This plan does not purport to supersede any Federal Aviation
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
t
h
o
s
e
concerning the rights of aircraft owners and operators or thos
e
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
a
f
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
procedures of anyone using the airport.
3/13/90
FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN
RUNWAY USE
1. Arrivals
Runway 9R or 9L preferred. If winds, weather, or operations dictate otherwise,
the order of preference will be 9R, 9L, 36, 27L, 27R, 18. The glide slope or VASI
should be used for descent
2. Departures
Runway 9R or 9L preferred. If winds, weather, or operations dictate otherwise,
the order of preference will be 98., 9L, 18, 27L, 27R, 36.
3. Calm Winds
The calm wind runway shall be 911
4. Jet Aircraft
Jet Aircraft shall depart and arrive on Runway 9Ft/27L. Departing aircraft shall fly
a southerly heading as soon as feasible. Training in jet aircraft in the traffic
pattern is prohibited.
NOTE: Practicality dictates that the same runway be used for arrivals and departures, thus
the tower will use the runway or runways that have the least noise impact on the
community. During hours that the tower is dosed, any traffic using the airport
shall follow normal procedures while keeping in mind these noise abatement
requirements.
TRAFFIC PATTERN
1. The traffic pattern altitude is a minimum of 1000 feet above ground level or 1900
feet mean sea level.
2. Departures on Runway 9R/27L should turn to a southerly heading after crossing
the departure end of the runway and attaining an altitude of 500 feet above
ground leveL Whenever possible, aircraft that will remain in the pattern shall use
the south parallel runway so that a turn to the south is feasible.
3. Traffic patterns are to be flown as published. Extended legs are not permitted
unless required by ATC or traffic density.
NOTE: Pilots are encouraged to avoid flight over residential areas as much as is practical.
NIGHTTIME RESTRICTIONS
1. Nighttime operations between the hours of 2200 and 0700 local time are strongly
discouraged. Minimal traffic pattern time should be exercised during these hours.
/ LI
MAINTENANCE RUNUPS
1. No maintenance runups are permitted between the hours of 2000 and 0800 local
time. At all other times the minimal amount of time needed is enc
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
Extended maintenance runups are permitted only in a designated area
a
n
d
a
r
e
dictated by ATC and runway usage. Aircraft should be on a heading of 36
0
d
e
g
r
e
e
s
as much as is feasible.
HELICOPTER TRAINING
1. Shall be permitted only during the hours of operation of the Air Traff
i
c
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Tower. ATC shall dictate all procedures, keeping in mind the residential c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
and noise. Helicopters shall conduct training south of the parallel runways.
GENERAL
1. Fixed Base Operators at the Flying Cloud Airport shall be thoroughly fa
m
i
l
i
a
r
w
i
t
h
these noise procedures and keep their clients informed of them and an
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
.
2. Flight Instructors shall be thoroughly familiar with these noise proce
d
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
instruct all students on them.
3. All tenants are expected to keep informed on these procedures and to f
o
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
m
.
Tenants should be thoroughly familiar with their airaaft type and how to reduce
its noise levels.
3/13/90
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 90-178
COOPERATIVE SIGNAL AGREEMENT
TH 5 AND DELL ROAD
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the City of Chanhassen and the City
of Eden Prairie have cooperated to prepare construction plans and specifications for the
improvement of TH 5 between Heritage Road and West City limits of Eden Prairie;
WHEREAS, the project development proposes to install traffic control signals at Dell Road
(184th Street); and
WHEREAS, a cooperative agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and
the City of Chanhassen with the City of Eden Prairie has been prepared which identifies the
maintenance and financial obligations of each agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that
Agreement Number 67390 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation and the
City of Chanhassen is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to
execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Franc, Clerk
MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AGREEMENT NO. 67390
BETWEEN
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
AND
THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN
TO
Install a new Traffic Signal with Street Lights and Signing on
Trunk Highway No. 5 at 184th Street (Dell Road) in Eden Prairie
and Chanhassen, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
S.P. 2701-34
F.P. F 014-3(41)
Prepared by Traffic Engineering
ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
City of Eden Prairie $6,857.47 City of Chanhassen $6,857.47
None
Otherwise Covered
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the
State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter
referred to as the "State", and the City of Eden Prairie,
hereinafter referred to as "Eden Prairie", and the City of
Chanhassen, hereinafter referred to as "Chanhassen", WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 161.20 authorizes the
Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and
cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of
constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system;
and
WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is
justification and it is in the public's best interest to install
a new traffic control signal with street lights and signing on
Trunk Highway No. 5 at 184th Street (Dell Road); and
WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest
for the State to provide a new cabinet and control equipment to
operate said traffic control signal; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the traffic control
signal with street lights and signing work is eligible for 76.75
percent Federal-aid Primary Funds; and
WHEREAS, Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, and the State will
participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic
67390
-1-
control signal with street lights and signing as hereinafter set
forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan,
specifications and proposal and shall perform the engineering and
inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set
forth. Such work as described immediately above shall constitute
'Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to
hereinafter.
2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is
not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment
rental required to complete the work, except the cost of
providing the power supply to the service pole or pad, shall
constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so
referred to hereinafter.
3. The State with its own forces and equipment or by
contract shall install a new traffic control signal with street
lights in accordance with State Project No. 2701-34 and
Federal-aid Project No. F 014-3(41) on Trunk Highway No. 5 at
184th Street (Dell Road). Estimated Construction Cost is
$111,300.00 which includes State furnished materials.
Anticipated Federal-aid share is 76.75 percent. Anticipated
State's share is 11.625 percent. Eden Prairie's share is 5.8125
67390
-2-
percent. Chanhassen's share is 5,8125 percent.
4. The State shall install or cause the installation
of overhead signing and shall maintain said signing all at no
cost to Eden Prairie or Chanhassen.
5. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in
writing by the State, Eden Prairie and Chanhassen shall each
advance to the State an amount equal to their portion of the
project costs. Eden Prairie's and Chanhassen's total portion
shall consist of the sum of the following:
a. Eden Prairie's and Chanhassen's respective
share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on
the actual bid prices and the estimated State
furnished materials costs.
b. Six (6) percent of each respective share
(Item (a) above) for the cost of Engineering
and Inspection.
6. Upon completion and final acceptance of the
project, Eden Prairie's and Chanhassen's final share shall
consist of the sum of the following:
a. Eden Prairie's and Chanhassen's respective
share (as specified in Paragraph 3), based on
the final payment to the Contractor and the
actual State furnished materials costs.
67390
-3-
j5,43
b. Six (6) percent of each respective final
share [Item (a) above] for the cost of
Engineering and Inspection.
The amount of the funds advanced by Eden Prairie
and Chanhassen in excess of Eden Prairie's and Chanhassen's final
share will be returned to Eden Prairie and Chanhassen without
interest and Eden Prairie and Chanhassen agrees to pay to the
State that amount of their final share which is in excess of the
amount of the funds advanced by Eden Prairie and Chanhassen.
7. Chanhassen shall provide an adequate electrical
power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of
said traffic control signal with street lights installation shall
provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost
and expense of Chanhassen.
8. Upon completion of the work contemplated in
Paragraph 3 hereof, it shall be the Eden Prairie's
responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (I) maintain the
luminaires; (2) relamp the traffic control signal and street
lights; and (3) clean and paint the traffic control signal,
cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the
State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to perform all
other traffic control signal and street light maintenance.
67390
-4-
9. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work
to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of
Eden Prairie or Chanhassen and any and all claims that may or
might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on
behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims
made by any fourth party as a consequence of any act or omission
on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work
contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and
responsibility of Eden Prairie and Chanhassen. The State shall
not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any
employees of Eden Prairie or Chanhassen.
10. Timing of the traffic control signal provided for
herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner
of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except
with the approval of the State.
67390
1,54c
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
DATE: July 6, 1990
SUBJECT: Vacation of Open Space Easement Olympic Hills Golf Course
In 1981 the Olympic Hills Corporation and the City of Eden Prairie
entered into an open space agreement whereby the City was granted
an open space easement over the Olympic Hills Golf Course property.
When the Mount Curve Addition was approved for rezoning to R1-13.5
and subdivision into 4 lots, the easement was not vacated by the
City Council.
The Mount Curve Addition is not immediately adjacent to the golf
course. It is bordered on the north, east, and south by single
family homes and the Olympic Hills maintenance building on the
west.
In order to vacate any portion of the open space easement, approval
is required by the City Council. Since this site is not
immediately adjacent to the golf course, is surrounded by single
family homes and the maintenance building, and the City previously
granted rezoning and subdivision approval to this property, Staff
would recommend vacation of the easement.
VACOSE.MDF:bs
Z3 "90 viz," a) 2,4 , ,;ss (31) ouss03 C mss (25‘,' (33),7 63 .71 . , -‘0p '‘ ; p 31 0 Is" A)29 32 r:‘1*08 I 39) 50) v Mt J4 is 40 CUR 8., ril v- 2 s.3st 8 ( 18) 9 • .• ! .1).:' .-...14501.." • 8 . — (12)3 ek_/,ee ;;;•-(1?): _ 9. sVet tal I020 o a • 200 (20) 11 41,' 6 1.4 117 JAY • I LACE 85 ' • (926) 4:9 (41)1.-I 7 (41 6 (39)i 25 -9 (37) 3 36) ,49 27. e (2) • (65) ! .4) r 11 iv art4 64 (I 8.33 40) Iv 3 4. 8.31 9192 r (63)' 3 k„. , (12) g I) 9 22 ,1 144.7 10 ( 1)) g 10 cr, ( 14 ) (.39 ( 6) 40 • (46) 2 3 152.5 (47) € 3 = vs•'(48) t• * (64) 99)t — 4- .34 (56) (52) 691.07 ( 0. 3 IS (50 1'0 - 136.3s V (93) c. W 12/ 143 138 3. JO (60) 0 6 (65) 98.33 eir ( 56) ct 93 89038 331 8 (50) rs( 55) .87 (64) t 4 so 137.9 ( 62) 2* 200 (3) P- i t4. 13 :‘"*.f448‘2:1!;04•E i 17102 cm" e- 25 .59 .01.4 g (45) g I 4-63--711 I 14 44:' ( 52) ( 24 )4,,,al s as* ,ts 69 444e is ( 53) I?, (63) »r; - t,Aet or A - VAZA I 901 , 44. ,., 2 35) t',8 it8 4,0 •1 Ps t7 (5 ';'? V. , „ ( 57» e, as 20 (667?4)(61) ../. 4 ,412
MICHAEL J ADAMS
RICHARD L CESARIO•
DAVID 1 VAN HOUSE"
TODD R. ILIFF
DAVID I CHRISTIANSEN."
ROBERT a BOEDIGHEJMER
ADAMS & CESARIO, RA.
ATIORMAS AT LAW
SUITE SOO • FIRSTAR FINANCIAL. CENTER
1550 FAST 79th STREET
BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55425
OFFICE 4612) 554-2000
July 2, 1990
FAX 16124 654-4051
TOLL FREE 1-1051545-7292
*Certified Civil Trial Specialpt
••Centtied Real Property Spcma
Also admitte4 to practice m
Mr. Roger Pauly
Eden Prairie City Attorney
Lang, Pauly & Gregerson
250 Prairie Center Drive
Suite 370
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
VIA TELECOP/ER TRANSMISSION
and FIRST CLASS MAIL
Re: Mount Curve Addition
Resolution No. 86-170
Dear Mr. Pauly:
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Developer's Agreement dated
June 17, 1986, Mount Curve Developers, a Minnesota general partnership,
applied for and received a guide plan amendment and zoning district change
from the above-referenced property located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of Franlo Road and Mount Curve Road, to allow for the
construction of four single family residences.
As you are aware, in 1981 the Olympic Hills Corporation and the City
of Eden Prairie entered into an Open Space Agreement whereby the City was
granted an open space easement over the Olympic Hills Golf Course property.
A portion of the open space easement was vacated in 1983-84 to allow for the
development of Olympic Hills seventh Addition. I have now been advised by a
title company that the open space easement should also be vacated over the
four lots located in Mount Curve Addition. My file indicates this was not
done at the time of rezoning. I am enclosing herewith a form of quit claim
deed I have prepared for the City's vacation of the open space easement over
these parcels. Please review the same and contact me with any questions you
may have.
Very truly yours,
ADAMS & CESARIO, P.A.
David J. Van House
Attorney at Law
DJV/jms
Enclosure
cc: Don McGlynn
Jerry Scholts 1_,
Form Mo. 30 M —OUIT CLAIM DEED Mtnnesem thrtlerrn Comeranelos Ulan. (Itill)
Zoroorotmn frartnorom
to InOmMualls1
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered :Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( / filed ( I not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
19
County Auditor
' by
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date: 19
(reserved for recording data)
The City of Eden Prairie
municipal corporation under the laws of
Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to
Grantee (0, 1
County. Minnesota, described as follows:
That certain open space easement over, under and across Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4,
Block 1, Mount Curve Addition granted to the City of Eden Prairie pursuant
to that certain Open Space Agreement dated March 25, 1981, filed August 31,
1981 as Document No. 1436200.
All other terms and conditions of the Open Space Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.
Nfm.e.moilMWs,wMinuombft#1
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
City of Eden Prairie
Affix Dep.! I ox Stomp HP,
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
By
Its
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of 19 by and the and of the (it,' al Eden Prairie I muni ci pal coreoration
under the laws of Minnesota on behalf of the corporation
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL IOR OTRER TITLE OR RANKI
MONATVALOMASONTAXIMOACKNOWLEDGMEMI.
lg.r::11T.11:1,11:11,1=2;t1,72A,'ISIS ""."°*" ".'""
THMINSTRUMENTWARDRAITINIT(NAMEANDADDRESSI:
ADAMS R CFSARIO, P.A.
15SO Fast 79th Street
Suite A00
Bloomington, 719 57425
Deputy
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
Minnesota
real property in Henneprn
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #90-165
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HOLTZE EXECUTIVE
RESIDENCE FOR HOLTZE BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Holtze Executive Residence for Holtze
Brothers Development Company, dated June 8, 1990, consisting of 7.2
acres into one lot and one outlot for construction of a 220 unit
hotel development, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is
found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie
Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 10th day of
July, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 15, 1990
SUBJECT: Holtze Executive Residence Inn
The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the Holtze
Executive Residence on May 29, 1990, subject to the recommendations
of the Staff Report which included a number of plan revisions to be
completed prior to review by the City Council.
1. Revise the exterior elevations to meet the City Code for
exterior materials.
The Planning Commission did not feel that the proponents
provided substantiation for the PUD waiver to allow more than
25% wood siding on the buildings. The Commission recommended
that the exterior building elevations be revised to meet City
Code for 75% facebrick and glass. The proponent will be
requesting that the city Council consider the waiver.
2. provide architectural elevations for the storage building
which are compatible in terms of roof lines and exterior
materials with other buildings on the site.
The proponent has submitted exterior building elevations which
depict compatibility of building materials and architecture
with the main buildings on site. The extarior material is all
wood which will require a waiver through the PUD.
3. evise the landscaping Plan. to Provide a berm along Valley View Road which screens Parking areas. Add conifers and mass
shrub plantings along Office Ridge Circle to screen Parking.
The grading plan has been revised to provide a berm along
Valley View Road to screen views of the parking area. Some
additional shrub plantings have been added along Office Ridge
Circle, however, it will not be adequate enough to screen
parking. The Staff Report recommends additional conifers and
a triple row depth of shrub plantings in order to effectively
screen parking.
4. Submit samples of exterior materials and colors for review.
The proponent has provided an exterior materials board which
will be available for Council review at the meeting. A white
brick, white wood siding, and black shingles are proposed for
Memo
Holtze Executive Residence
June 15, 1990
Page 2
the exterior materials. These colors are not compatible with
other buildings within the PUD to the east. The use of white
colors on the building would also not be consistent with the
site plan ordinance which requires compatibility of colors and
exterior materials with adjacent uses. Lighter colors are
found extensively in warmer climates because they are cool.
Since the proponent has first developed these in the Denver
area perhaps this is why they have made white a first color
choice. Darker colors in northern climates convey a warmer
feeling especially during the winter months.
5. Provide lighting details.
The proponent has supplied lighting details which depict a 20
foot high downcast cutoff luminar. This would be consistent
with parking lot lighting on adjoining properties.
6. Provide sian detail for the pylon sign and wall sign.
The proponent has submitted a plan for the pylon sign and the
wall sign in compliance with City Code requirements.
7. Revise the site plan to show a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk
along Office Ridge Circle.
Staff's initial recommendation for a 5 foot wide sidewalk
along Office Ridge Circle was based on possibility of
extending an internal connection through the PUD to Market
Place Drive. (No sidewalk connection was shown between the
cul-de-sacs on the 1980 PUD.) The Parks Commission reviewed
the requirement for the 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk and felt
that since an internal private sidewalk was provided within
the project to the trail on Valley View Road that the
additional sidewalk would not be necessary.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Staff would recommend that the development plans be
revised to meet the City Code requirements for exterior materials,
revise the exterior material to reflect warmer colors compatible
with adjoining land use within the PUD, and revise the landscaping
plan for better screening from Office Ridge Circle.
EXECVLMO.MDF:bs
It •• ar
PROPOSED SIT Of.
1G -SE
r.
arc .
' 1c-sfG-4R
5 ,
r‘47 f4 I MAT1ON MAP
C-HEG -S ERA.:
STAFF REPORT
The Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THRU: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 25, 1990
Holtze Executive Residence
Southwest corner of Valley View Road and Office
Ridge Circle
Holtze Brothers Development
-Eden Prairie Land Development Company and
Condon-Naegle Realty Company
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on
31 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review with
waivers on 5.6 acres.
PATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
3. Zoning District Change
from Office and C-
Regional to C-Regional-
Service on 5.6 acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 5.6
acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 7.2
acres into 1 lot and 1
outlot for the
construction of a 220
unit hotel development.
BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Guide Plan
designates this site as
Regional-Commercial.
Surrounding land uses to the
north, east and south are
guided Regional Commercial.
The land area to the west is
guided Regional-Commercial.
This site is part of the 31
acre Lake Ridge Office Park
which was approved in 1980.
Roltse Executive Residence
May 25, 1990
The PUD has been amended over the years to include a mixture of
Office, and Industrial uses. This 5.6 acre parcel was envisioned
as an office use in the original PUD. This site was zoned Office
in 1985 for a three story 50,00 square foot office building. A
hotel use on this site would be an appropriate land use since it is
part of the Major Center Area.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS
In order for this site to develop as proposed, waivers are
requested through the Planned Unit Development District Review
process. Waivers are requested for Floor Area Ratio, building
height, exterior materials, and parking setback.
1. Floor Area Ratio
The site plan is proposed at a .47 Floor Area Ratio. The C-
Regional-Service Zoning District will allow up to a .40 Floor
Area Ratio. Hampton Inn (.47 Floor Area Ratio), Brock
Resident Inn (.44 Floor Area Ratio), and Marriott Courtyard
(.45 Floor Area Ratio), received waivers through the Planned
Unit Development District Review process. These waivers were
granted predicated upon trade-offs including lower Base Area
Ratios which allowed more open space between the buildings,
and additional landscaping which helped reduce the visual
impacts of increased building mass above code.
2. Buildina Height
A building height waiver is requested to 46 feet. The maximum
height in the C-Regional-Service Zoning District is 40 feet.
Hampton Inn (45 feet), Brock Resident Inn (44 feet), and the
Marriott Courtyard (46 feet), received waivers through the
Planned Unit Development District Review process. Reasons for
granting a PUD waiver for increased building height could be
building setbacks in excess of the code from the property
line, grade changes which reduce the visual height from Valley
View Road, and the top 6 feet of each building is a pitched
roof which is a small amount of building mass.
3. Exterior Materials
The City Code requires in the Commercial and Office Zoning
Districts a minimum of 75% facebrick and glass. A waiver is
requested to allow 50% wood. Half of the buildings are
proposed as all brick, and half of the buildings are proposed
as all wood siding. Waivers were requested for all stucco on
the Marriott Courtyard, all stucco on Hampton Inn, and all
wood on the Brock Residence Inn. The City did not grant PUD
2
`••• 41..‘ $ *A., '
Holtze Executive Residence
May 25, 1990
waivers for these hotels.
4. Zero Lot Line Setback
A zero lot line setback waiver from 10 feet to 0 feet is
requested along the west property line. The site plan could
be revised to meet the 10 foot setback requirement, however,
the site plan with the waiver would result in more efficient
parking and provides more open space between the buildings.
1/12L MAN
The site plan depicts the construction of 10 buildings totalling
220 rooms, plus a club house. The site is being developed at a
Base Area Ratio of .16. The Code will allow up to a .20 Base Area
Ratio.
Parking required would be based on 1 car per guest room, plus 1 per
employee, for a total of 228 spaces. A total of 228 spaces are
shown on the site plan.
Access to this site is from Office Ridge Circle and Valley View
Road. A left turn lane from west bound Valley View Road must be
constructed subject to Hennepin County Department of Transportation
approval. The driveway entrance off Valley View Road is slightly
offset between the median opening on Valley View Road. The
proponent must work with Hennepin County Department of
Transportation to review the geometric alignment of the driveway
entrance.
The 1980 PUD depicted a cross access in the southeast corner of the
property. The site plan depicts a location for a future access
road. (A cross access agreement and easement will also be
necessary to the west of the site for access to a future parking
area.)
ARCHITECTURE
The PUD waiver section indicated that the proponents are requesting
a height waiver from 40 to 46 feet, and exterior materials waiver
to permit 50% wood siding on the buildings. The Code would permit
up to 25% wood. While there appears to be justification for the
increase in height based upon grade changes and consistency with
past approvals, there is no justification for the exterior
materials waiver. The exterior elevations of the buildings should
be revised to meet Code.
3
Holtz. Executive Residence
May 25, 1990
Although wood can occupy up to 25% of the building's exterior, a
metal or vinyl siding would be recommended for maintenance reasons.
A garage is proposed in the southeast corner of the property. No
building elevations have been submitted for this structure.
Exterior elevations, materials and roof lines should be consistent
with the main buildings on the property.
LANDSCAPING
The amount of landscaping required for this project would be based
upon the caliper inch requirement according to building square
footage, screening of parking areas from public roads, and to
mitigate the impacts of the increase in Floor Area Ratio and
building height. Parking is visible from Valley View Road and
Office Ridge Circle. It is possible to construct a berm at the top
of the slope along Valley View Road which will block site lines
into the parking area. It is not possible to screen parking with
berming from Office Ridge Circle since the setback to parking is
17.5 feet. In this area, additional conifers and shrub plantings
in triple rows can be added which would screen parking.
The total caliper inches provided on-site is comparable to the
amount provided on other hotels. The Marriott Courtyard, Brock
Residence Inn, and.Hampton Inn hotels provided, on average, 5.37
inches of trees for every 1,000 square feet of building. The
Holtze Executive Residence provides 5.27 inches of trees for every
1,000 square feet of building.
GRADING
This site slopes steeply from a high point adjacent to Valley View
Road to a low point in the southwest corner of the site. Up to 15
feet of fill will be necessary in order to accommodate the grading
plan as proposed. Grading is proposed within the Interstate 494
right-of-way and will require MNDOT approval.
UTILITIES & STORM DRAINAGE
Sewer and water services are available to this site by connection
to utilities which exist in Office Ridge Circle. Sewer and water
lines are stubbed to the adjoining undeveloped properties. The
water main is looped within the property (and all buildings will be
sprinkled) for fire protection.
Storm water runoff will drain through a series of storm sewer pipes
and catch basins into a ponding area which is off-site.
4
Holtz° Executive Residence
May 25, 1990
LIGHTING
Exterior lighting is proposed within the parking lot. Lighting
should be at a maximum height of 30 feet and downcast cutoff
luminars.
SIGNS
A pylon sign is proposed on Valley View Road and a building wall
sign along Interstate 494 frontage. No sign details have been
provided.
SIDEWALKS 6 TRAILS
There is an existing 8 foot wide bituminous trail along the south
side of Valley View Road. A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk
connection is proposed from the buildings to this trail. A
sidewalk should also be installed along Office Ridge Circle with
connections to buildings on-site.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for PUD
Concept Amendment on 31 acres, PUD District Review on 5.6 acres,
Zoning District Change from C-Regional and Office to Commercial-
Regional-Service on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres, and
a Preliminary Plat of 7.5 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot based on
plans dated May 9, 1990, subject to the recommendations of this
Staff Report dated May 25, 1990, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall:
a. Revise the exterior building elevations to meet the City
Code for on exterior materials.
Provide architectural elevations for the storage
building. Architecture for the storage building shall be
compatible in terns of roof lines and exterior materials
with other buildings on-site.
b. Revise the landscaping plan to provide a berm along
Valley View Road which screens parking areas. Add conifers and mass shrub plantings along Office Ridge
Circle to screen parking.
c. Provide samples of exterior materials and colors for
review.
5
Molts. Executive Residence
May 25, 1990
d. Provide lighting details.
e. Provide sign details for the pylon sign and wall sign.
Both signs should meet City Code requirements.
f. Revise the site plan to show a 5 foot wide concrete
sidewalk along Office Ridge Circle.
2. Prior to final Plat approval, the proponent shall:
a. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, storm
drainage and erosion control plans for review by the City
Engineer.
b. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control
plans for review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
a. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
b. Provide samples of exterior materials for review.
c. Provide lighting details for review.
d. Provide sign details for review.
4. Notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours
in advance of grading.
5. Receive approval from the Hennepin County Highway Department
for construction of a left turn lane and driveway access onto
Valley View Road.
6. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, receive approval from the
State Highway Department for grading work in 1-494 right-of-
way, and approval from the Watershed District.
7. PUD waivers are granted for building height to 46 feet, Floor
Area Ratio to .47 and a 0 setback to parking along the west
property line.
HOLTZE.MDF:mmr
6
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8c LINDGREN, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7900 AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431
TELEPHONE 10121 535•311100
TELECOPIER 16121535-5102
PETER K. BECK
May 8, 1990
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: Holtze Executive Village
Dear Sirs:
2000 PIPER JAPPRAY TOWER
2E2 SOUTH NiNTM STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 65402
TELEPHONE 16121 335-6510
TELECOPIER16121 339-1002
REPLY TO BLOOMINGTON
g,HTga
PLANNING DPI .---
NI P4 0 9 1990
CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE
1500 NORTHW
fINANCIAL CENTER
This letter is to introduce the Holtze Executive Village project, and
will constitute the written narrative accompanying the Land
Development Application for Holtze Executive Village.
The proposal is to develop a 5.6-acre site at the southwest corner of
Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle (the Property) into an 11-
building, 220-unit residential hotel (the Hotel). The Property is
currently vacant, is zoned Office and Regional Commercial, and is
located adjacent to the Bryant Lake Center Planned Unit Development.
The proposal is to rezone the Property to Regional Commercial Service
for the Hotel use, replat the Property into a single lot with one
outlot, and to amend the Bryant Lake Center PUD to include the
Property. This will provide the applicant with maximum flexibility in
the design of the site and will provide the City with maximum control
in its review of the Hotel proposal.
The Property is designated for regional commercial uses in the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Hotel is consistent with this
designation. Surrounding uses are predominantly office, including
Bryant Lake Center and Bryant Lake Office Tech Center to the east, and
Super Valu to the north, across Valley View Road. The Hotel will be
compatible with and complimentary to these uses. Traffic generated by
the Hotel will be particularly complimentary to traffic generated from
surrounding office uses.
The proposed rezoning of the Property to Commercial Regional Service
will put the Hotel in the proper zoning district, consistent with the
past practice of the City to locate hotels in Regional Commercial
Service districts. The Hotel will comply with all of the requirements
and performance standards for the regional commercial service
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8c LINDGREN, LTD.
4 City of Eden Prairie
t May 8, 1990
- page 2
district, with four minor variances as noted below. It is proposed
that these variances be reviewed and acted on as part of the Planned
Unit Development Amendment review process, consistent with City
ordinances and past practices.
The remainder of this letter will respond specifically to the
information items requested in Sections E and K of the Appendix to the
City's land development procedures.
E.1.
-p. . • op •
The proposal is to build a 220-unit residential hotel on the 5.6-acre
Property. The Hotel will consist of ten separate 22 to 24-unit
buildings clustered around a 5,400 square foot clubhouse.
The eleven buildings which make up the Hotel are in two groupings.
Four hotel buildings and the clubhouse surround the entry courtyard in
a formal, "hotel" setting. These buildings are designed to serve the
needs of the typical, overnight "hotel" guest. They will all have
facebrick exteriors and will be connected to the clubhouse by covered,
colonnaded walkways. The six remaining hotel buildings surround the
entry courtyard ensemble in a more informal, residential setting.
These rooms are designed to serve the needs of longer term,
"residential" guests.
The buildings are positioned so that each will present a slightly
different facade to surrounding streets and properties, and to provide
maximum ease of pedestrian access for guests and tenants from the
hotel buildings to the clubhouse. The ensemble of five buildings
surrounding the entry courtyard has been designed to provide an
elegant entrance to the hotel from Valley View Road. The entry
courtyard, clubhouse and a water feature in the interior of the Hotel
site have been aligned with the entrance from Valley View Road to
bring guests off of Valley View Road into the center of the Hotel
complex. The clubhouse fireplace will be visible through glass doors
from the drop-off point in the entry courtyard.
Parking is distributed around the perimeter of the hotel buildings.
Parking areas are screened from surrounding streets and properties by
a combination of berms, grade changes and landscaping. City Code
requirements for off-street parking are met on the property. In
addition, the applicant will enter into a cross parking easement with
the property owner to the west which will result in an additional 43
spaces of parking being available when the property to the west is
developed.
LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN. LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
4ay 8, 1990
Page I
Landscaping throughout the property will be far in excess of city
requirements. The landscaping is designed to screen parking areas
from off-site views, to separate parking areas from the hotel
buildings, to visually separate individual buildings, and to enhance
the interior amenity area. Most guests will be walking between their
hotel building and the clubhouse at least twice a day. For this
reason, particular attention has been paid to landscaping interior
areas to create a residential environmental along the interior
sidewalks.
The hotel buildings are positioned so that the minimum separation
between any two buildings is 20 feet. However, in virtually all
instances, buildings are positioned corner-to-wall, rather than wall-
to-wall. This increases actual separation between Hotel units in
separate buildings and, together with carefully planned landscaping
between the buildings, provides for visual separation of the buildings
from off-site locations.
The Hotel will be 5 to 7 feet below Valley View Road and the property
will slope down an additional 14 to 15 feet, generally from north to
south. This sloping topography of the Property will result in a
variety of roof line elevations for the individual buildings as viewed
from off-site. This feature, coupled with the positioning of the
buildings, will increase visual interest of the Hotel by giving the
appearance of a variety of building types and heights, and will reduce
the visual impact of the project from Valley View Road.
The Hotel buildings are designed so that units can be rented as one or
two-bedroom suites. One-bedroom suites will range in size from 600 to
650 square feet, while two-bedroom units will be 950 square feet.
Amenities in each unit include gas fireplaces, full kitchens, direct-
in telephone lines, cable television and others.
Units will be rented for periods ranging from over-night hotel stays
up to six-month leases. Longer term residents will include relocating
families, executives with long-term projects in the southwest
metropolitan area, etc.
The maximum number of individual units will be 220 if all units are
rented as one-bedroom suites. If all units are rented as two-bedroom
suites, the maximum number of units would be 119. The actual number
of units rented to individual guests or residents on any given night
will vary between 119 and 220. Nightly rates will range from $35 to
$105, with lower rates for longer stays.
The clubhouse will include the Hotel lobby, a large breakfast room, an
executive lounge, exercise facilities, Jacuzzi, and swimming pool.
C
LARKIN, HOFFNU0q, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
May 8, 1990
page 4
The swimming pool is located off the rear of the clubhouse such that
it could be enclosed for year-round use if experience indicates there
is a demand for year-round use and the costs of enclosing the pool are
reasonable. Complimentary continental breakfast and hospitality
gathering is provided daily to all guests and residents. The Hotel
will employ a total of approximately 30 employees.
The Holtze Executive Village at Eden Prairie is patterned after two
very successful Holtze Executive Village hotels developed by Holtze
Brothers Development Company in Aurora and Engelwood, Colorado. The
hallmark of the Colorado hotels, which has been further refined and
improved upon in the Eden Prairie Executive Village, is extensive and
carefully designed landscaping throughout the project site with
particular attention to landscaping and building positioning in and
around the clubhouse and courtyard area.
The Holtze Executive Village at Eden Prairie will be unique in the
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Holtze Executive Village will be an
exceptionally high quality, attractive addition to the hotel
opportunities available in Eden Prairie. Because of its unique room
type and the level of services offered for the price, the Holtze
Executive Village will draw guests from far outside Eden Prairie;
guests which would not otherwise stay or spend money in Eden Prairie.
E.2. Guide Plan Framework.
The Property is designated for regional commercial uses in the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Holtze Executive Village proposal is
consistent with the Guide Plan and the Major Center Area Plan.
E.3. Zoning Classification.
The present zoning is Office and Regional Commercial. The proposed
zoning is Regional Commercial Service. The proposed zoning is
consistent with the City's guide plan and the Hotel, in turn, is
consistent with the proposed zoning.
E.4. Variances Requested.
The plan submitted varies from the strict requirements of the
Commercial Regional Service District in four respects:
1. Floor area ratio proposed is .47 instead of .40.
2. Maximum height proposed is 46 feet instead of 40 feet.
LARKIN, IDDFFMANT, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
-City of Eden Prairie
Aay 8, 1990
Page 5
3. Setback for parking along the west side of the project is
proposed at zero instead of 10 feet.
4. Percentage of brick or better exterior building material
proposed is 50% instead of 75%.
1. Although the proposed floor area ratio is .47, the base area ratio
for the Hotel is .16 (.20 allowed). The higher floor area ratio is a
result of the hotel buildings being three-story structures. The .47
floor area ratio is requested because, with the three-story buildings, no
additional land is necessary to locate the 11 buildings and provide
sufficient parking. The buildings are positioned around and focus on the
clubhouse and courtyard area. Even if additional land were added to the ..
project, the buildings would still be clustered around the clubhouse and
courtyard area to provide the desired sense of community and easy access
to the clubhouse and courtyard facilities. Most guests will be walking
between their building and the clubhouse/courtyard facilities at least
twice a day.
The buildings have been positioned so as to maximize physical and visual
separation between buildings. Increased land area would not increase the
3eparation of buildings or change the relationships of the buildings to
each other either physically or visually. The Hotel buildings fit very
well on the Property. Increased land area would not contribute any to
project design and therefore the .47 FAR is requested. The .47 FAR
requested is also consistent with what the City has allowed for similar
hotel proposals and other buildings in the Major Center Area.
Planning staff has identified the following five criteria for determining
whether an increase in FAR is appropriate:
A. Is there an overall benefit to the City?
Yes. The Holtze Executive Village will be a great asset to the
City. It will 2rovide a needed service on an undeveloped
property in the Major Center Area. It will attract both
overnight guests and short term residents to the Major Center
Area, increasing overall activity levels in the shopping and
commercial hub of the City. We believe the proposed FAR
variance is to the City's overall benefit because the project
cannot be financed or developed without the variance. The
prototype for this project, the Holtze Executive Village Hotel
in Engelwood, Colorado, was developed at .55 FAR and works very
well. We have reduced the FAR for the Eden Prairie project to
.47 to be consistent with what the City has allowed for similar
hotel proposals and other buildings in the Major Center Area.
However, any further reduction in FAR would render the project
economically unfeasible and undevelopable.
LARKIN, ficAFIFIAAIst, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
May 8, 1990
Page 6
B. Is the project better with the variance than without it?
Yes. As discussed above, the 11 buildings which constitute the
Holtze Executive Village must be clustered as close together as
is reasonably possible to provide the desired sense of
community and easy access to the clubhouse and courtyard
facilities. Because guests will be walking daily between the
residential building and the clubhouse/courtyard facilities, it
is very important to keep the walking distance between the
residential buildings and the clubhouse as short as possible,
particularly in light of the Twin Cities area climate. The
project is better with the variance because walking distances
are kept to a minimum and the sense of community is preserved.
C. Will the higher floor area ratio precipitate other variances?
No. The requested FAR variance will not precipitate other
variances. All setback requirements are met by the project.
The three other variances requested are unrelated to the FAR.
D. Will the higher floor area ratio create site plan problems?
No. In fact, the site plan works much better at the FAR
requested because of the need to keep the buildings close
together and in close proximity to the clubhouse/courtyard
facilities. The site plan provides plenty of room for berming
and landscaping as necessary, and includes only two small
retaining walls on a site that slopes over 20 feet from one
side to the other.
E. Is there sufficient landscaping to mitigate impacts of
increased FAR?
Yes. As discussed below, landscaping for the project far
exceeds City Code requirements and more than mitigates any
impacts of the increased FAR.
2. The maximum height of the Hotel buildings is 46 feet, six feet
above the 40 feet provided for in the zoning code. However, the
Property will be from 5 feet to 20 feet below Valley View Road. The
buildings will therefore appear from Valley View Road to be
substantially shorter than even 40 feet. In addition, the building
roofs have a 45 degree pitch, so that the top 6' of roof represents a
very small amount of building mass. The Hotel is located far away from
any residential areas, in an area of commercial and office uses. Past
practice of the City has been to allow higher buildings in similar
areas.
LARKIN, HOFFMAN. DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
Aay 8, 1990
Page 7
3. The property immediately to the west of the hotel site will
someday be developed for office uses. Because of existing soil
conditions on that property, parking for any office building will have
to be located along the common property line with the Hotel. Because
the parking needs for hotel and office uses peak at different times of
the day, it is proposed that there be an area of shared parking for the
two uses along the common property line. A cross parking easement
agreement will be entered into providing for 43 spaces of shared parking
on each side of the property line.
To make use of the shared parking spaces more convenient, it is proposed to eliminate the normal setback area along the west property
line. The hotel and office parking spaces would then "read" as a single
parking facility between the two uses. This solution also makes sense
from a traffic flow perspective, as access to Valley View Road from the
office development to the west of the Hotel will be by easement through
the northwest corner of the Hotel site.
This is not an off-street parking variance. All required
parking spaces are provided on site. The purpose of the variance is
simply to provide extra parking for both uses and to make the extra
parking as convenient as possible for users from both facilities. The
green space that would otherwise occupy the ten foot setback area on the
west side of the property has been distributed throughout the site.
There is no increase in FAR as a result of this variance for the shared
parking spaces.
4. Guests of the Holtze Executive Village will fall into one of
two categories: short term, "hotel" guests who will stay from one to
five nights; and longer term, "residential" guests who will be staying
from several weeks up to six months or longer. Short term, "hotel"
guests are accustomed to the institutional, formal appearance of a brick
hotel building. For these guests Holtze Executive Village will offer
the four buildings surrounding the entrance courtyard. These four
buildings, and the clubhouse, will be covered entirely in facebrick.
Access between the four hotel buildings surrounding the entry courtyard
and the clubhouse will be by covered, colonnaded walkway.
Longer term, "residential" guests will be staying in the six
buildings which surround the five building entrance ensemble. The
objective is to provide a more informal, residential environment for
these guests who will be away from their homes for extended periods of
time. The key elements in creating this residential environment
include: putting all parking on the outside edges of the project, away
from pedestrian areas in the interior of the project; heavily
landscaping the interior, pedestrian areas of the project and the areas
between buildings; creating residential type sidewalks between each
LARKIN, iioFFNLA.N. akLy 6k LINDGREN. LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
May 8, 1990
Page 8
building and the clubhouse; and using an exterior building material
which conveys the feeling of a single family residential neighborhood.
The goal is to create an environment where long term guests feel that
they are living in a comfortable, single family residential area from
which they walk to the more formal clubhouse area, with its formal,
brick buildings, to eat, socialize, exercise, etc.
A key element in creating this environment is the appropriate
use of building materials. For this reason, the applicant is proposing
to use facebrick on the clubhouse and "hotel" guest buildings
surrounding the entry courtyard; and siding on the "residential" guest
buildings. This will result in 50% "brick or better" siding materials
for the overall project. The applicant recognizes that variances from
the 75% brick or better requirement are generally not granted by the
City. However, because the creation of a residential environment for long term guests is critically important to the success of the Holtze
Executive Village, we make this request for a 25% variance.
The purpose of the 75% brick or better standard seems to be
twofold: (1) because brick and comparable materials are more easily
maintained; and (2) because brick is perceived as improving the
appearance of large scale commercial projects. With respect to
maintenance, Holtze Brothers Development Company and Holtze Corporation
develop and manage their hotels for their own account. They do not sell
their hotels, but manage them on a permanent basis. Proper operation of
the hotel, including proper maintenance of all hotel facilities, is a
necessary pre-requisite for the development and management entities to
receive a return on their investment as developers and their management
fees as operators. Proper maintenance of the hotel facilities will not
be an issue.
With respect to the appearance of the hotel buildings and the
overall project, the applicant would submit that the nature of the
project, the heavy landscaping, and the other amenities provided justify
a variance from the strict requirement of the 75% brick or better
materials. As discussed above, the hotel buildings themselves are not
large buildings, but small, 22-24 unit buildings which have been
designed specifically to have a single family residential character. It
is this single family residential character which the applicant is
proposing to preserve by the use of a more typical single family
building material, wood siding.
Furthermore, landscaping for the Hotel will exceed City
requirements, as shown on the landscape plan. For example, City Code
requires 364 caliper inches, or approximately 119 trees for this
Property. The applicant proposes to plant 184 trees for a total of 576
caliper inches. Together with shrubbery, mulch, sod, soil and
LARK IN, HOFFMAN. DALY 8C LINDG R EN, LTD.
city of Eden Prairie
lay 8, 1990
PagD 9
irrigation, the total landscaping budget for the Hotel will
substantially exceed the cost of landscaping that City Code would
require. The cost differential far exceeds the dollar savings as a result of the 25% variance from the brick or better standard. The
variance is not being requested because of a desire to invest less money
in the Hotel, but because of the desire to invest money in the Hotel as
effectively as possible to create an attractive, residential setting.
In addition to the landscaping, which will exceed City
requirements, the Hotel will also include a number of amenities which
will contribute significantly to its appearance. Project amenities
include a water feature in the interior of the Hotel; a covered
colonnade surrounding the entry court; patterned concrete paving on the
entry court; a swimming pool (which may someday be enclosed), Jacuzzi
and exercise room in the clubhouse; and benches, barbecue areas, and
other activity areas scattered throughout the Hotel site.
Overall, the Hotel will be extremely attractive in appearance
both from the outside and the inside. The 25% variance from the brick
or better standard will in no way detract from the appearance or
maintenance of the project, but will contribute significantly to the
..reation of a residential character in the areas of the project for
longer term, residential guests. The 25% variance is more than off-set
by the increased landscaping and other amenities provided throughout the
Hotel site.
E.5. 8xisting Land Use.
Vacant.
E.6. Phasing and Construction Schedule.
The Hotel will be built in a single phase. It is expected that
construction will take approximately 9 to 12 months. The applicant
would like to start construction in July 1990.
II I -
• . •0 D. u -0 - - • • E.8. Rua
Restrictions.
The proposal is to provide two easements for access from adjoining
properties through a portion of the Hotel site to public roads. In the
northwest corner of the Property an access easement will be provided for
the property to the west, to enable traffic from that property to exit
onto Valley View Road at the main entrance to the Hotel. This is the
only way that the property to the west of the Hotel would have two-way
access onto Valley View Road. In the southeast corner of the Property it
is proposed to provide an easement for access from the Property to the
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8c LINDGREN, LTD.
4: 2;; 8 yof 1 Miln Prairie
page 10
west to Office Ridge Circle. This is consistent with a requirement
i
n
the earlier approval of the Bryant Lake Center PUD.
In addition, a cross parking easement will be entered into with the
o
w
n
e
r
of the property to the west, as described in Section E.4.3. above.
E.9. 5-1111:1_ arl013W-L1ina
The Property will consist of 242,013.7 square feet. Building covera
g
e
will be approximately 39,900 square feet. Base area coverage is .16.
Building floor area is 116,600 square feet. Floor area ratio is .47.
Parking provided is 228 spaces, plus 43 spaces which will be availabl
e
b
y
cross-parking easement when the property to the west is developed.
E.10. Eignagft.
Signage will include a pylon sign on Valley View Road and a buildi
n
g
s
i
g
n
facing Interstate 494 to the south of the project, plus necessary
directional signage, all as allowed by and in compliance with City
ordinances.
E.11.
Lighting will be as shown on the Site Plan, all in conformance wit
h
C
i
t
y
ordinance.
E.12. Transportation
City staff has reviewed the transportation impacts of the Hotel and
determined that the Hotel will not be inconsistent with the Major C
e
n
t
e
r
Area Traffic Study.
E.13 Environmental Assessment.
Not applicable.
E . 14 . EhoreadiadjilandplAin •
Not applicable.
E.15. Airport Zones.
Not applicable.
E.16 Ilinaolitian_ALAny_Exnass_Ung.
Not applicable. Outlot A will not be purchased by the applicant.
LARKIN, HoFFNLAN, DALY 6k LINDGREN, LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
Aay 8, 1990
Page 11
E.17. Water.
There are no public or protected waters on the Property. Drainage will
be to an existing drainage area in approximately the same volumes as
existing drainage from the property.
E.18. Wildlife.
There are no significant wildlife habitats and no trees on the Property.
E.19. Soils
Soil tests have yet to be completed.
2.20. Exiatiala-Stniaturm.
None.
E.21. Steep Slopes.
The property has received a significant amount of fill in connection with
roadway construction and prior development activities in the area, and
currently has some steep slopes which are the result of these prior
filling activities. There are no natural steep slopes on the property.
Development of the project will require that a substantial amount of
additional fill be brought onto the property. It is proposed that the
bulk of this material come from Outlot A and from Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) right-of-way to the south and east of the
property. Eden Prairie Land Company II, owner of Outlot A, has agreed to
any necessary grading on Outlot A. Negotiations with MnDOT on the use of
fill from and regrading of a portion of its right-of-way are ongoing.
When these negotiations are completed a final grading plan for Outlot A
and the MnDOT right-of-way areas affected will be submitted.
The grading plan for the Property itself is complete and has been
submitted with the other plans. The grading plan has been designed to
accommodate the significant slope of the property (from north to south)
with a minimum of retaining walls. Only two small retaining walls will
be required, as shown on the grading plan.
Because of the low base area coverage and heavy landscaping of the
project, stormwater run-off will be approximately the same following
development as under existing conditions.
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
4[ City of Eden Prairie
May 8, 1990
Page 12
K.1. Pwnership.
Present ownership:
Eden Prairie Land Company II - approximately 95 percent of Land
area.
Condon-Naegele Realty Company - approximately 5 percent of land
area.
K.2. Developer.
Holtze Brothers Development Company. Holtze Brothers Development Company
has developed two other Holtze Executive Village hotels, in Aurora and
Engelwood, Colorado. These hotels have been very well received by the
communities in which they are located and by the public, and are very
successful. Holtze Brothers Development Company will develop the Hotel,
which will then be managed by Holtze Corporation. Holtze Corporation and
Holtze Brothers Development Company are family owned companies based in
Denver, Colorado and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and are engaged in the
business of developing and managing residence hotels.
K.3. Financing.
Financing for the project is not yet finalized.
K.4. Development Method
The Hotel will be developed by Holtze Brothers Development Company in a
single phase and managed by Holtze Corporation, which is owned by the
same parties that own Holtze Brothers Development Company.
K.5. Development Timing.
The applicant would like to begin construction in July 1990 and complete
the Hotel in a single phase within 9 to 12 months.
K . 6 . crisjsaLawaija_aeraayans .. •
Governmental review and approvals are believed to include only watershed
district approval and county approval for a curb cut onto Valley View
Road. No public improvements will be necessary to serve the Hotel.
K.7. Other Information
See above.
L &REIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDC3REN, LTD.
City of Eden Prairie
May 8, 1990
Page 13
K.8. Ella_aQUndazial.
See Preliminary Plat.
K.9. pun Area.
The proposed Amendment of the Bryant Lake Center PUD affects 7.24 acres.
K.10. Regional Relationships.
The Property is an excellent site for a hotel because of its proximity to
Interstate 494 and the Major Center Area of Eden Prairie. The project
will not generate any significant impacts on any regional services or
systems.
K.11. Existing Land Use.
Vacant.
K.12. Transportation.
City staff has determined that transportation systems are adequate to
accommodate the Hotel and that the Hotel will not generate any adverse
impacts on transportation systems.
K.13. Existing Zoning.
Office and Regional Commercial. Proposed zoning is Regional Commercial
Service.
K.14. Guide Plan
See above.
K.15. inajzaiz_and_cnnalusjana
See above.
K.16. Photographs.
Not applicable.
K.17 Ecological Factors.
There are no significant ecological features or trees on the Property.
LARKIN, EL0FFIKAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LID.
,City of Eden Prairie
lay 8, 1990
page 14
K.18. Legal Instruments.
Access and parking easements as outlined above will be provided prior to
final plat.
K.19. Use Profile.
See above.
=MO=
Holtze Brothers Development Company respectfully requests that the City
commence review of their request for PUD amendment review, zoning
district change, preliminary plat, and site plan review. Inquiries or
requests for additional information may be directed to the undersigned or
to Eric Holtze at 822-1070.
Very truly yours,
Natter K. Beck, for
,,ARXIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
kw
PKB:FM4S
,3t;)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEP/N COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #90-166
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
OF VILLAGE KNOLLS FOR ARGUS DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain
areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public
hearing on the Village Knolls PUD Concept by Argus Development and
considered their request for approval for development (and waivers)
and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on June 19,
1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Village Knolls, by Argus Development, being in Hennepin
County, 'Minnesota, legally described as outlined in
Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as
outlined in the plans, (as revised), dated June 14, 1990.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated May 14, 1990.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 10th day
of July, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #90-167
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VILLAGE KNOLLS
FOR ARGUS DEVELOPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Village Knolls for Argus Development,
dated June 14, 1990, consisting of 42.7 acres into 23 single family
lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for a residential
development, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found
to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning
and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 10th day of
July, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION #90-166
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
OF VILLAGE KNOLLS FOR ARGUS DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code
provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain
areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public
hearing on the Village Knolls PUD Concept by Argus Development and
considered their request for approval for development (and waivers)
and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on June 19,
1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Village Knolls, by Argus Development, being in Hennepin
County, .Minnesota, legally described as outlined in
Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as
outlined in the plans, (as revised), dated June 14, 1990.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the
Planning Commission dated May 14, 1990.
ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 19th day
of June, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
RES90166
MEMO
'0: Mayor and City council
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: June 15, 1990
SUBJECT: Village Knolls Project
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Village Knol
l
s
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
Unit Development on May 29, 1990, subject to the recommendations in
t
h
e
S
t
a
f
f
Report which required a number of items to be revised prior to rev
i
e
w
b
y
t
h
e
City Council:
1. Revised the concept plan according to Attachment A to reduce gradin
g
i
n
the creek corridor.
The concept and grading plan has been revised to shorten the cul-de
-
s
a
c
off Homeward Hills Road and pulls grading limits further away
f
r
o
m
Purgatory Creek.
2. Modify the site plan to indicate a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk a
l
o
n
g
one side of the interior loop road within phase two.
The site plan has been revised to depict a 5 foot wide sidewalk al
o
n
g
the west side of the interior loop road in phase two.
3. Modify the site plan to provide for a 40 foot wide outlot with
t
h
e
grading plan depicting an 8 foot wide bituminous trail from Homew
a
r
d
Hills Road to the bridge across Purgatory Creek at a •ra.e o e c-e.
'
n
•
The site plan and grading plan has been revised to provide a 40 f
o
o
t
wide outlot and an 13 foot wide trail at a maximum grade of 8% betw
e
e
n
Homeward Hills Road and the bridge across Purgatory Creek.
4. Provide a tree replacement plan for 300 caliper inches; provid
e
a
reforestation plan for the graded areas adioining Purgatory Creek
a
s
shown on Attachment A.
A tree replacement plan for 300 caliper inches and reforestation
p
l
a
n
for the slopes adjacent to Purgatory Creek have been provided.
5. Modify the storm drainage plan to either extend the storm sewer pi
p
e
t
o
the center line of the creek or redesign the storm_ sewer syst
e
m
t
o
redirect all storm drainage to Homeward Hills storm sewer system.
The storm sewer system plan has been revised to redirect all
s
t
o
r
m
drainage to Homeward Hills Road storm sewer system.
VKM0615.4DF:bs
STAFF REPORT
The Planning Commission
PROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
MED Chris Enger, Director of Planning
IMTR: May 25, 1990
SUBJECT: Village Knolls
WCATIOA: East of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive
APPLICANT/
ns OWNER: Joe Miller Homes & Wallace Hustad
AEOUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
42.7 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review with
waivers on 8.7 acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment LI
within the R1-13.5 Zoning -L District on 8.7 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of 42.7
acres into 23 single :
family lots and 2 outlots
and road right-of-way for -1 a single family
residential development.
BACKGROUND
This is a continued item from
the May 14, 1990 Planning
Commission meeting. The
Planning Commission recommended
that the development plans be
returned to the proponent for
the following revisions:
1. Revise the site plan to
comply with the Shoreland
Ordinance requirements.
2. Revise the site plan to
eliminate encroachment
within the Conservancy
Area of Purgatory Creek.
PROPOSED SITE
a
'
7or.'.7;:3-7.741
PIAREA LOCATION MAP
7$
Village Knolls
May 25, 1990
3. Minimize overall tree loss on-site.
4. Minimize the number of waivers requested through the PUD.
MORELAND ORDINANCE
The PUD Concept plan has been revised from 69 to 68 lots. Two flag
lots are proposed for Lots 16 and 17 instead of a cul-de-sac on the
original proposal. A cul-de-sac has been added off Homeward Hills
Road plus two lots with driveway access to Homeward Hills Road.
These site plan changes allow the project to meet the minimum
requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance for lot size, lot width at
building setback, lot width at the high water mark, and building
setback.
PURGATORY CREEK CONSERVANCY AREA
The previous Staff Report identified impacts in the Purgatory Creek
Conservancy area. 16 of the 69 lots had building pads and grading
within the Conservancy Area which resulted in alteration of the
character of the Creek Corridor and loss of trees.
Sheet 7 indicates the Conservancy and Shoreland Areas along
Purgatory Creek. The exhibit depicts a revised Conservancy Line.
The City Staff has, on occasion, recommended moving the Conservancy
Line after field inspection of the proposed revision to determine
what impact revision would have on the character of the creek.
When it was determined that the character of the creek valley would
be preserved, then the Conservancy Line was changed. The City
Staff feels that the Conservancy Line could be amended for the
following reasons:
1. Portions of the PUD are part of the existing Bluffs West
subdivision which was approved prior to the establishment of
the Conservancy Line. The PUD pulls the existing lot lines
farther away from the creek, thereby minimizing encroachment
on the tree line.
2. Use of flag lots on Lots 16 and 17, Block 2 in Phase 11
instead of the cul-de-sac on the previous plan pulls building
pads and grading out of the Conservancy Area and preserves
more trees.
3. Use of a cul-de-sac and two lots with direct driveway access
to Homeward Hills Road pulls grading and house pads farther
away from the Conservancy Area in the northeast corner of the
property. The Conservancy Line in this area would be
adjusted, however, mitigation would be required on the
regraded portion where shown on Attachment A. This will
2
Village Knolls
May 25, 1990
screen views from the proposed trail within the Creek
Corridor.
Attachment A indicates a revised cul-de-sac and lotting plan
which would result in saving more trees and less grading
adjacent to the Creek Corridor. The reconfiguration of the
lots would result in a variance from the Shoreland Ordinance
for building width at the setback line.
TREE LOSS
The previous Staff Report indicated a 39% loss of significant trees
within the PUD area. Changes in the grading plan allow more trees
to be saved within Phase 1, and the overall tree loss has been
reduced to 35%, or 614 inches out of a total of 1847 inches on-
site. The majority of the trees being saved are Within the
Conservancy Area of Purgatory Creek outside of the lots proposed
for the second phase.
In addition, since house pads are farther from the Creek there is
more of the understory vegetation along the steep slopes adjacent
to the Creek is preserved. This provides for better slope
stability, erosion control, and preserves more of the Creek
character than the previous plan.
PUD DISTRICT REVIEW WAIVERS
The previous proposal for Phase 1 depicted 16 waivers for lot size
and street frontage. The revised plan depicts 8 waivers. Lot size
waivers are requested for Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, and Lots 9 and
10, Block 1. Street frontage waivers are requested for Lots 6 and
7, Block 2, and for Lot 3, Block 1.
The PUD waiver for Lot 3 is the result of keeping the existing
house and providing a common driveway for Lots 2 and 3, which
intersects opposite Silverwood Road. The waivers for lot size and
street frontage would be a trade off for larger lots and greater
setbacks between houses and the Creek.
STORM DRAINAGE
Most of the storm water runoff will drain towards an existing storm
sewer system on Homeward Hills Road, however, a portion of the
project in Phase 1 will drain towards Purgatory Creek. Since only
Phase 1 will be developed at this time, the storm sewer plan
proposes a partial pipe and overland drainage swale to Purgatory
Creek. On other projects with overland drainage, there has been
severe erosion problems, washouts, and loss of vegetation along
Purgatory Creek due to concentrated water runoff. It is
3
Village Knolls
May 25, 1990
recommended that the storm sewer pipe be extended all the way to the channel of Purgatory Creek. Another option would be to
redesign the storm sewer plan for Phase 1 to drain into the
existing storm sewer system on Homeward Hills Road.
DIDSWALIS 6 TRAILS
There should be a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk constructed along
one side of the loop road within Phase 11. In addition, the plan
should be revised to depict the location of an 8 wide bituminous
trail from Homeward Hills Road to the existing bridge crossing o
n
Purgatory Creek. A trail must be provided within a 40 foot wid
e
outlot and grades for the pathway should not exceed 10%.
ACCESS
Homeward Hills Road is a minor collector road. Intersections
should be aligned directly opposite, or no closer than 150 feet
offset. The site plan meets this criteria. The cul-de-sac on the
north end of the project is opposite the park entrance road to
Homeward Hills Park.
Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 would have direct driveway access to
Homeward Hills Road. Due to the volume of traffic on Homeward
Hills Road, it is recommended that these lots share a common
driveway with provision for turnaround on each site such that cars
would not have to back directly onto Homeward Hills Road.
CONCLUSION
The PUD as proposed is better than the previous submission with
changes in road locations and lotting patterns which result in
compliance with the requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance and a
reduction in the impacts on the Conservancy Area along Purgatory
Creek. The amount of significant tree loss has been reduced to 35%
and more of the understory vegetation along the slopes adjacent to
the Creek Corridor have been preserved since grading and house pads
have been pulled further away from the Creek. Where grading
encroaches into the Conservancy Area in the northeast corner of the
subdivision, reforestation of the regraded area (which is currently
treeless) will mitigate the impacts of encroachment.
Revisions to the site plan according to Attachment A can reduce th
e
grading impacts further. The site plan must also be revised t
o
provide a 40 foot wide outlot and the grading plan should depict n
o
more than a 10% grade for the proposed trail connection to th
e
bridge over Purgatory Creek.
4
Village Knolls
May 25, 1990
STAPP RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff would recommend approval of
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
P
u
D
Concept on 42.7 acres, PUD District Review w
i
t
h
w
a
i
v
e
r
s
o
n
8
.
7
acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-1
3
.
5
Z
o
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
on 8.7 acres and Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres
i
n
t
o
2
3
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
2
outlots based on plans dated May 25, 1990
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
recommendations of Staff Report dated May 11
,
1
9
9
0
a
n
d
M
a
y
2
5
,
1990, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to review by the City Council, the p
r
o
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
:
a. Revise the Concept plan according to Attachme
n
t
A
t
o
reduce grading in the Creek Corridor.
b. Modify the site plan to indicate a 5 foot wide
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
sidewalk along one side of the interior loop road
w
i
t
h
i
n
Phase 11.
c. Modify the site plan to provide fora 40 foot wi
d
e
o
u
t
l
o
t
with a grading plan depicting an 8 foot wide b
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
trail from Homeward Hills Road to the bridg
e
a
c
r
o
s
s
Purgatory Creek at a grade not exceeding 10%.
d. Provide a tree replacement plan for 300 caliper
i
n
c
h
e
s
.
Provide a reforestation plan for the graded
a
r
e
a
s
adjoining Purgatory Creek where shown on Attach
m
e
n
t
A
.
e. Modify the storm drainage plan to either extend
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
sewer pipe to the center line of the Creek, or
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
the storm sewer system to redirect all storm dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
t
o
Homeward Hills Road storm sewer system.
2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent
s
h
a
l
l
:
a. Provide detailed storm water runoff, utility an
d
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
control plans for review by the City Engineer.
b. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
plans for review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, the propone
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
:
a. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
b. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshall.
5
Village Knolls
May 25, 1990
4. Grading shall be limited to the area required for Phase 1
only. Stake the proposed grading limits with a construction
fence. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48
hours in advance of grading.
5. Concurrent with Phase 11 construction, construct a 5 foot wide
concrete sidewalk along the interior loop road.
6. If the site plan is revised according to Attachment A,
Shoreland Ordinance variances will be required when Phase 11
is subdivided for proposed Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. The
Shoreland Ordinance variances for lot width at the building
setback results in a better site plan with less grading
adjacent to the Creek.
7. Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 shall share a common driveway.
Each lot shall have a turnaround.
8. Waivers are granted through the PUD District Review for lot
size on Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, and Lots 9 and 10, Block 1;
and street frontage for Lots 6 .and 7, Block 2, and Lot 3,
Block 1.
9. Waivers for flag Lots 16 and 17, Block 2 on Phase 11 will be
necessary as part of a PUD District Review when Phase 11 is
submitted for zoning and plat approval.
VLGEKNOL.MDF:mmr
6
I 11.)L L)Illt
H There are no trees in this ar ea .• The topography appe:
incorrect, due to f ill that has been brought in over '
EWARWHILLS ROAD
-
Noftead...r—e"."
TRAIL Mat
ow?
or ,t
eiaa, A0°10 1,FAIX.
•
Attachment A
down the s lope.
1+.3 !S SteRn ind ,:onrains a few trc.
1'1,1 e
Background
This site is currently guided
Low Density Residential and is
zoned R1-13.5. Portions of
this site are within the
transition and conservancy
areas as depicted on the 1975
Purgatory Creek and Open Space
Plan. Portions of this site
are impacted by the Shoreland
Ordinance for lots abutting
Purgatory Creek.
P.U.D. Concept
The P.U.D. Concept on 42.7
acres covers land from Homeward
Hills Road to the centerline of
Purgatory Creek. The first
STAFF REPORT
T2: The Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 11, 1990
Village Knolls
East of Homeward Hills Road at Silver Wood Drive
Joe Miller Homes and Wallace Hustad
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on
42.7 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review with
waivers on 8.7 acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment with the R1-13.5
Zoning District on 8.7 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single
family lots and 2 outlots and road right-of-
way for a single family residential development.
PROM:
THROUGH:
MTN:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT!
FEE OWNER:
REQUEST:
phase of the development called Village Knolls is 23 lots immediately adjacent to Homeward Hills Road. The second phase is
concept only for land development adjacent to the creek corridor.
The net density of the PUD is 2.44 units per acre based on 28.3
acres. The gross density which includes the creek corridor is 1.62
units per acre.
Puraatorv Creek Conservancy Area
Attachment A indicates the transition and conservancy areas of the
1975 Purgatory Creek Open Space Plan. Twenty-nine of the total 69
lots are within the transition area which is a "build with care"
area and 16 of the 69 lots are within the conservancy area which is
a "no build zone". The attached memo indicates other projects in
the Lower Purgatory Creek area which have lots in the conservancy.
However, no grading or building pads have been permitted within the
conservancy area unless there was a trade for land area outside of
the conservancy that was desirable to preserve. This occurred in
the Bluestem Hills 5th Addition and the Creekview project. No
trade is proposed as part of the PUD.
/Moreland Ordinance
Purgatory Creek is classified as a general development water.
Provisions of the Shoreland Ordinance that are applicable would be
a 13,500 square foot minimum lot size, 120 feet of lot width at the
building setback, 120 feet at the Ordinary High Water Mark, and a
100 foot building setback. Eleven of the 14 total lots (where
shown on Attachment A) within the shoreland area do not meet the
minimum lot width of 120 feet or 120 foot lot width at the Ordinary
High Water Mark. Shoreland setback variances are required on
proposed Lots 4 and 5 which are setback a minimum of 70 feet from
the creek. This is based on a 50 foot pad depth. A survey of
houses built within scenic areas of the community average 70 feet
in depth. This would mean that the Shoreland setback could be 50
feet from the centerline of the creek. Of the projects surveyed
within the Lower Purgatory Creek area, no shoreland setback
variances have been granted.
• Impact of Conservancy Area Encroachment and Shoreland Variancea
An overall tree inventory has been submitted which depicts specific
tree types and sizes for the first phase of the project, and an
overall general description of tree types for the balance of the
property. Attachment B indicates the environmentally sensitive
portions of the site. Within the conservancy area, areas 3 and 4
are the most sensitive based upon the size, type, and quality of
the trees which are predominantly oak. Area 2, contains a small
2
amount of tree cover, but is the closest area to the creek
immediately adjacent to steep slopes. The creek follows the rear
lot line of Lots 4, 5, and 6 and may be a safety issue if the creek
continues to erode the slopes. Area 5 is the top part of a ravine,
located approximately 500 feet from the centerline of the creek.
Most of the trees in this area are box elder and elm.
Gradina and Tree Loss
There are a total of 1,847 inches of significant trees within the
P.U.D. Trees in phase one total 389 inches, phase 2 totals 330
inches and 1,128 inches are within the conservancy area to the
centerline of the creek. Grading will result in a 39% tree loss or
719 inches, two thirds of which are oak trees. Tree replacement
would be 373 inches. Grading also removes understory vegetation
along the steep slopes adjacent to Purgatory Creek. This
vegetation provides slope stability, erosion control and is a
significant part of the creek character, especially in areas 2, 3,
and 4.
Twelve of the lots in the conservancy area are proposed at 50 foot
pad depths. The attached survey of building permits issued in
areas adjacent to creeks, lakes, and scenic areas average 70 feet
in depth. With larger pads there will be additional grading, tree
loss, and encroachment to Purgatory Creek conservancy area.
Phase One Preliminary Plat
Phase 1 depicts 23 lots on 8.6 acres at 2.64 units per acre. If
this project was submitted by itself, a Comprehensive Guide Plan
change would be required since the density exceeds 2 1/2 units per
acre. However, the overall density of the total PUD is 2.44 units
per acre.
Lot sizes range from 11,200 square feet to 18,675 square feet with
an average lot size of 14,031 square feet. Waivers are requested
through the PUD District Review for lot sizes less than 13,500
square feet, and for street frontage less than 85 feet. Lot size
waivers are requested for Lots 3-9, Block 2 and Lots 6, 9, and 10,
Block 1. Street frontage waivers are required on Lots 2 and 3,
Block 1 and Lots 6, 7, 11, and 12, Block 2.
Utilities
Sewer and water service is available by connection to existing
facilities within Homeward Hills Road.
Most of the storm water run-off will drain towards an existing
storm sewer system in Homeward Hills Road, however, a portion of
the project will drain towards Purgatory Creek. Since only phase
one is proposed to be developed at this time, the storm sewer plan
proposes a partial pipe and overland drainage swale down to
Purgatory Creek. Additional overall storm water run-off
information is necessary to evaluate the proposal and the impact on
natural features and the creek corridor. If the overland drainage
would result in tree loss and significant erosion, then the storm
sewer system should be revised to connect to Homeward Hills Road or
be carried by storm sewer pipe to Purgatory Creek.
fflidewalks and Trails
There should be a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along one side of
the loop road within phase one of the Village Knolls project. The
second phase should include a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along
one side of the loop road.
7lood Plain
This site is adjacent to a flood plain area. No grading or filling
is proposed within the flood plain.
Conclusions
The City is being asked to consider approval of a 42.7 acre, 69 lot
PUD Concept plan and phase one approval for preliminary platting of
23 lots adjacent to Purgatory Creek. The Staff Report identifies
grading and tree loss impacts in the conservancy area, and
Shoreland area. Tree loss is calculated at 39%.
The City should decide whether the site plan with PUD waivers for
lot size and street frontage, shoreland variances, and conservancy
area encroachment is better than if no waivers, variances or
conservancy area encroachment was considered. The developer is
proposing the dedication or preservation of 12.4 acres to the
centerline of the creek as a trade-off for the shoreland variances and encroachment into the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area.
Historically, the City has approved lots in the conservancy area of
Purgatory Creek, predicated upon no building or grading within the
conservancy area. House pads and grading have been allowed in the
conservancy area if there was a land trade for area outside of the
conservancy that should be preserved such as steep slopes or woods.
No shoreland setback variances have been approved. If the City
feels that the impacts on the creek corridor are significant,
there are a number of ways in which the site plan could be modified
to reduce impacts in the conservancy and shoreland areas. These
would include:
1. Use of cul-de-sacs instead of a through road to minimize filling in the ravines.
2. Fewer but larger lots adjacent to Purgatory Creek.
4
3. Shift the loop road further west. This would result in larger
pads outside of the conservancy area, protect more of the
wooded slopes and compliance with the 100 foot shoreland
setback.
Staff Recommendations
If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the development
plans as proposed, then one option would be to recommend approval
of the PUD Concept, preliminary plat and zoning request based on
plans dated May 7, 1990 subject to recommendations in the Staff
Report and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review proponent shall:
A. Modify the site plan to eliminate the shoreland setback
variances, and remove building pads and grading from the
conservancy area.
B. Submit a tree replacement for 373 inches.
C. Provide more detailed storm sewer information on overland
drainage to Purgatory Creek.
2. Prior to final plat approval proponent shall:
a. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion
control plans for review by the City Engineer.
b. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control
plans for review by the Watershed District.
3. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall:
a. Stake the proposed construction limits with a tree fence
and notify the City 48 hours in advance of grading.
4. Current with construction of phase one construct a 5 foot wide
sidewalk along the internal loop road.
5. Shoreland setback variances require review and approval by
Board of Appeals and Adjustments.
If the Planning Commission feels that the impacts on the site's
natural features including trees, the conservancy area, and the
shoreland area are significant, then one option would be to return
the development plans to the proponent for revisions.
VILKNOLS.MDF
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: May 11, 1990
SUBJECT: Purgatory Creek Master Plan and Residential Projects
Within Shoreland Areas
The Purgatory Creek Master Plan was prepared in 1975 as a guide for
the City to review the development along the Purgatory Creek
valley. The conservancy line was developed to define an area
beyond which no development should occur. The conservancy line was
drawn on a large scale and generally follows the rim of the creek
valley, tree coverage, and contour lines. The purpose of the
conservancy line was to establish a tentative boundary of a natural
area that would be preseved along Purgatory Creek valley.
Generally the City has required scenic easements or land to be
dedicated on all land between the conservancy line and the creek.
However, City Staff has, on occasion, recommende moving the
conservancy line after field inspection of the proposed revision to
determine what impact the revision might have on the character of
the creek valley. If it was determined that the character of the
creek valley would be preserved the conservancy line was changed.
The Parks Commission has previously recommended that the Bluestem
Hills 5th Addition and Creekview conservancy lines be modified. In
both cases the developer proposed a land swap as a mitigating
measure which gave the City control over more land along the creek
than if the original conservancy line was adhered to. There have
been several subdivisions approved along the lower Purgatory Creek
area between County Road #1 and Riverview Road with lots platted
within the conservancy; however, all building pads and grading have
been outside of the conservancy. Scenic easements have been
established over the concervancy area within the platted lots and
the balance of the land along the creek was gifted to the City.
Staff has reviewed a majority of subdivisions approved along the
lower Purgatory Creek valley. The attached chart provides
comparison between the subdivisions along the lower Purgatory Creek
area.
The following is a brief analysis of seven residential projects
within Shoreland areas:
Weston Bay
Weston Bay is a 24 lot single family subdivision abutting Mitchell
Lake. Mitchell Lake is classified as a natural environmental water
1
with a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet, minimum width at the
building line of 150 feet, minimum width at the Ordinary High Water
Mark, 150 feet, and a minimum setback from the Ordinary High Water
Mark of 150 feet. None of the lots that abut Mitchell Lake met the
requirements of the natural environmental water. The lot sizes
range from 21,000 to 39,000 square feet with a 28,000 square foot
average. Lake frontages range from 52 to 197 feet with a 100 foot
average. All but one of the lake lots met the 150 foot setback
requirement from the high water mark. This site was previously
zoned for 60 townhome units. Weston Bay was approved for 24 single
family lots. Variances were granted from the Shoreland Ordinance
due to a reduction in density, the lot sizes proposed were
comparable to existing lots in the Timber Lake residential project
to the north (which was approved prior to the adoption of the
Shoreland Ordinance) and all but one lot met the 150 foot setback
requirement. There was a common lake access outlot which increased
the average frontage and lot size which they traded away individual
dock rights.
Red Rock Ranch
Red Rock Lake is classified as a recreational development water
with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, minimum width
building setback of 120 feet, minimum width at the Ordinary High
Water Mark at 120 feet, and minimum setback from the Ordinary High
Water Mark of 100 feet. The Red Rock Ranch plan had 31 lots
abutting the lake. The initial plan included 17 variances for
width at the high water mark and width at the building setback.
This plan was revised based upon Planning Commission recommendation
and the number of variances were reduced to two. The variances
were granted since the lots on the wooded point average 44,000
square feet, the remainder of the lakeshore lots averaged 33,000
square feet and the average lakeshore width was 145 feet. This
resulted in more trees saved on the wooded point, greater setbacks
between houses, and less visual impact on the lake.
Timber Creek
Timber Creek is a mixed use residential project with 68 multiple
family units and 40 single family units. Timber Creek abuts
Purgatory Creek which is a general development water. Three
variances were requested for lot width less than 120 feet for five
single family lots and for lot size less than 10,000 square feet
for one of the townhome buildings. The variances were granted due
to 51 of the 89 acres being set aside for public use along the
creek. Twenty-one of the 51 acres were in an oak wooded knoll that
could have been developed.
Creekview
The Creekview residential project abutted Purgatory Creek with a
net density of 1.5 units per acre. The initial plan reviewed by
2
the Planning Commission had shoreland setback variances for
2
0
lots. The project was revised based upon Planning Commission and City Council recommendations to meet all requirements of t
h
e
Shoreland Ordinance. In addition, approximately 15 acres
o
n
Purgatory flood plain was gifted to the City. Scenic easemen
t
s
were required on all steep slopes adjacent to the creek.
bores of Mitchell Lake
Mitchell Lake is classified as a natural environmental water wi
t
h
a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet, a 150 foot buildin
g
setback from the lake, and 150 feet of lot width require
d
.
Variances were granted for 10 of the 27 lots within the shorela
n
d
area. The variances were grantedfor setback to 100 feet on 5 lo
t
s
and lot width to 100 on 5 lots, since the overall density with
i
n
the area was in excess of one acre, the average setback was
i
n
excess of 150 feet, and the average lake frontage was 225 feet
.
Five acres of land adjacent to the lake which contain
e
d
a
significant number of 24 to 40 inch oak trees was also dedicate
d
t
o
the City..
MEM=
It appears that consideration for shoreland variances in som
e
o
f
the projects were based on trade-offs which resulted in a be
t
t
e
r
site plan which saved more trees and topography with benefits
f
o
r
the City.
PUROMP.MDF:bs
3
Land Gift Number of Lots Number of Lots Minimum Average Scenic or in in Creek Creek Easement Subdivision Acres Units Density Dedication Conservancy Area Transition Area Setback Setback Over Consery Hillsborough 16 34 2.2 3.4-acre gift 17 19 300 300 Yes March 1987 gift Creekview Estates 25 29 1.5 6-acre msiod 1980 dedication 15 15 lop 200 Yes Bluffs West 4th 14.3 19 1.3 4.3-acre May 1985 gift Bluffs East 5th 30 15 1.9 50-acre gift in PUD 0 17 120 300 Yes 0 23 300 300 .Yes Bluestem Hills 31.6 64 . 2.0 gift August 1986 15 15 120 250 Yes Bluff West 1st 100 210 2.2 land gift 7 13 200 200 Yes Creekview 78 93 1.3 15-acre ift 1 27 200 350 Yes Bluffs W. 7th 4.6 A060AGE 42.1 11 2.36 2.42 acre 66 1.77 GlIgication 1 2 9.4 19.9 300 191 300 315
(Source: Addition BUILDING PAD DEPTHS ON ESTIMATED HOUSE VALUES OVER $300,000 Lot surveys of April 4-June 1, 1989) Porch Deck If 14' Deck/Porch Lot Block Building Pad Depth Y N added, rev. pad Welters Bryant Pointe Welter 1 1.1 Oly Hills 3 Creekview Cardinal Hills Bluestem 5 *Bryant Lake Est Cardinal Hills *Red Rock Heights Bluffs East 5 2 49' 12 1 90' 2 1 60' 3 3 88' 6 ? (L84942' 4 2 70' 11 1 68' ? (L128975' 12 1 48' 4 1 75' 12 1 (L96980' 104' 56' 89' 94' *Minimum building pad depth should be 70 feet.
BUILDING PAD DEPTHS ON ESTIMATED HOUSE VALUES OF $200,000 $300,000 (Source: Lot surveys of April 4-June 1, 1989) Porch Deck If 14' Deck/Porch Addition Lot Block Building Pad Depth Y N added, rev. pad Kingston 4 2 64' x 78' Kingston 5 3 63' x Promotory 8 2 46' x 60' Bluestem 5 9 1 50' x ../ *Timber Lakes 5 1 52' x Starrwood 5 2 62' x Shady Oak Ridge 2 2 50' x Bluffs West 5 3 2 58' x Starrwood 13 1 68' x Bluffs West 5 4 4 65' x Bluestem 5 9 2 (175')50' x Carmel 4 4 64' x 78' *Weston Bay 5 2 49' x Tree Farm 2 7, 52' x Edenvale 10 .5 2 : 66' x Cardinal Ridge 1 2 64' x Cardinal Hills 14 3 48' x 62' Bluestem Hills 4 1 63' x Starrwood 8 3 68' x *Leo, 'ot - minimum building pad depth should be 60 feet
BRYANT POINT 6-89
Building Pad
Lot Block Length Depth
19 1 80' 63'
22 1 107' 55'
20 1 118' 75'
21 1 110' 76'
17 1 92' 80'
23 1 104' 65'
4 1 120' 76'
24 1 83' 54'
3 1 88' 90'
24 1 106' 63'
2 2 80' 56'
Porch/Deck If 14' Porch/Deck
Yes No added, Rev. Pad Depth
77'
1.:
PROPOSED SITE
-2aPUB!
[ T 1- -1
/
AREA LOCATION MAP
\ i 4-------1==
1
STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
May 25, 1990
Bentec Addition
13050 Pioneer Trail
.Bentec Engineering Corporation
Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review
within the Office Zoning District on 1.85
acres with variances to be reviewed by the
Board of Appeals.
2Q:
nam:
MRS:
RAM
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT/
yRE OWNER:
$EOUEST:
BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Guide Plan
depicts this site and sites to
the east and west as Low
Density Residential, with the
property to the south guided
Industrial. Surrounding land
uses consist of the Yorkshire
Point neighborhood to the east,
zoned RI-13.5, Nelson Plumbing
and Heating zoned 1-2 to the
south, Associated Well Drillers
and a single family home zoned
1-2 and Rural respectively to
the west, with Highway 169 to
the north. In 1981 the single
family house located on this
site was rezoned from Rural to
the Office Zoning District with
a variance granted for less
than 75% facebrick. A
condition of the variance
required that compliance to the
materials code take place
within five years, or risk the
property being rezoned Rural.
A preliminary plat of the
property into 1 lot was
Bentec Addition
May 25, 1990
approved at that time but never final platted.
BITE PLAN
The site consists of 1.85 acres, which includes a .4 acre p
a
r
c
e
l
being dedicated as Highway right-of-way. An addition is pro
p
o
s
e
d
on each end of the existing structure for a total building s
q
u
a
r
e
footage of 5,460, with a Base Area Ratio of 5% and a Floor
A
r
e
a
Ratio of 8% well within Code requirements. Due to the dedic
a
t
i
o
n
of Highway right-of-way, the property line will be within 18
f
e
e
t
of the proposed structure and 20 feet from the existing structure. Since a 35 foot front yard setback is required within the O
f
f
i
c
e
Zoning District, a variance will be necessary from the Boa
r
d
o
f
Appeals and Adjustments.
-
Based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office use, a tot
a
l
o
f
27 parking stalls is required. Sixteen spaces currently occupy
t
h
e
property. Because of the limited number of employees at
t
h
i
s
company, the additional parking should be placed into proof
-
o
f
-
parking at this time, maintaining maximum green space. A
t
r
u
c
k
lane has been added along the west side of the site to ac
c
e
s
s
a
proposed overhead door.
ARCHITECTURE
Each "end cap" addition proposed for the site is designed
t
o
m
e
e
t
existing roof pitches and building height. A shingled roof
w
i
l
l
b
e
maintained on the additions as well. As required by th
e
1
9
8
1
variance, the proponent is upgrading the structure to me
e
t
t
h
e
building materials code. Seventy five percent of the str
u
c
t
u
r
e
shall be facebrick and glass with the remainder as existin
g
w
o
o
d
and masonry.
UTILITIES
The current structure utilizes an on-site well and septic s
y
s
t
e
m
.
The proposal indicates connection to City sewer along the
e
a
s
t
property line, with the well remaining as their water sourc
e
.
LANDSCAPING
The site currently has a generous landscaping design which in
c
l
u
d
e
s
numerous evergreens, many of which exceed 10 feet in height.
B
a
s
e
d
on the total building square footage, 17 caliper inche
s
a
r
e
required. Twenty seven caliper inches are being provided to a
i
d
i
n
the screening of the overhead door and the parking lot area
f
r
o
m
the neighboring residential uses.
Benteo Addition
May 25, 1990
LIGHTING
No additional site lighting has been identified as part of this
submittal.
FINAL PLATTING
The preliminary plat approved for this site was never final platted
or recorded. The property currently exists as two lots with the
parking lot staggering an existing lot line. Since this proposal
does not change the preliminary plat other than indicating the
actual highway dedication, the proponent requests that the final
plat of the property be approved at the City Council based on the
1981 preliminary plat approval.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Amendment and
Site Plan Review within the Office District on 1.85 acres with
variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans
dated May 24, 1990, this Staff Report, and the following:
1. Prior to any grading of the property, the proponent shall
submit erosion control plans to the Watershed District and
City Engineer for review.
2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
a. Final plat the property and record at Hennepin County.
b. Provide detailed sanitary sewer connection plans to the
Engineering Department for their review.
c. Submit a bond to cover the installation of the proposed
landscaping plan.
d. Receive approval of a variance from the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments for a front yard setback from 35 feet
down to 18 feet.
BENTECSR.SAK:mmr
3
lio1R
1.1W, 40FC' CfiG- : .r.r=
PUB •
R E G ;PROPOSED SITE. V/ZE5t 1114 7.6,95,j
PUB
-/
AREA LOCATION MAP
menr-T1.
.2
STAFF REPORT
FROM:
THRU:
0.2g:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
Planning Commission
Donald R. Uram, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
June 22, 1990
Chi-Chi's Restaurant Parking Lot Expansion
Southwest corner of niddleset Road and Crystal View
Road
APPLICANT: Chi-Chi's Restaurant Corporation
FEE OWNER: Lariat Companies, Inc.
REOUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development District Amendment
with waivers on 18 acres.
2. Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser
Zoning District on 2.23 acres.
3. Site Plan Review on 2.23 acres.
BACKGROUND
This site is the location of
the proposed Chi-Chi 's
Restaurant reviewed and
recommended for approval by the
Planning Commission on January
22, 1990. Final approval was
granted by the City Council on
April 3, 1990.
PROPOSED PLAN
The current proposal includes
the construction of an
additional 36 car parking lot
on the property to the south
owned by Lariat Companies, Inc.
Presently, there are 116
parking stalls provided for
Chi-Chi's to service the 318
seat restaurant. A total of
106 parking stalls are required
per City Code at a ratio of 1
space per 3 seats. With the
additional 36 parking stalls, a
total of 152 parking stalls will be available for restaurant use.
The current parking lot proposal is consistent with the overall
concept plan submitted with the original Chi-Chi's plans, but not
subject to any approval. In order to continue shared parking, the
future land use on the property owned by Lariat Companies, Inc.
must generate off-peak traffic from that of the restaurant. A bank
was previously indicated as a potential land use for the site which
would continue to allow for shared parking.
Screening of the additional parking area will.be accomplished by a
temporary 4 foot high berm located on the south and west sides.
This berm will be removed with the development of the property.
PARKING LOT AGREEMENTS
In a letter dated May 18, 1990 from Sieger Architects, Consul
Restaurant Corporation is indicating to the City that they will
proceed at their own risk to construct the additional parking lot
in conjunction with the installation of the Chi-Chi's parking lot
(See Attached). The letter also states that the Consul Restaurant
Corporation is proceeding at risk with the installation of this
temporary lot and will make any necessary adjustments to be in
compliance with subsequent City approvals or conditions of
approval. In addition, Consul Restaurant Corporation has agreed
with Lariat Companies Inc. that Chi-Chi's is subject to any
additional agreements or requirements necessary to maintain a
shared parking with the proposed land use developed on this lot by
the Lariat Companies, Inc.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Staff recommends approval of a Planned Unit
Development District Review with waivers on 18 acres and a Zoning
District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District and Site
Plan Review on 2.23 acres based upon the revised plans dated May
11, 1990 and June 19, 1990, Staff Report dated June 22, 1990 and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to Council review the proponent shall:
A. Revise the plans to reflect a redesigned entrance into
the expanded parking lot which aligns with the parking
lot to the north.
B. Provide detailed storm water run-off and erosion control
plans for review by the City Engineer.
CHICHI2.DRU:bs
2
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
MONDAY, JUNE 25, 1990
A. CHI-CEI'S RESTAURANT, by Consul Restaurant Corporation.
Request for PUD Amendment Review and Site Plan Review for
parking lot expansion on 2.23 acres. Location: Prairie Center
Drive and Crystal View Road. A public hearing.
Tom Mitchell, attorney representing the proponent, stated that
the proposal was to enhance the existing parking. Presently
116 parking stalls were provided. A temporary arrangement had
been agreed upon between the proponent and Lariat Companies to
construct a 36 space parking area on the lot to the south of
Chi-Chi's Restaurant. Mitchell noted that the preliminary
bids which had been received to construct the parking lot were
higher than anticipated and Chi-Chi's Restaurant may not
proceed with the expansion.
Hallett was concerned that the decision to proceed was being
based solely on cost and not on need. Mitchell replied that
Chi-Chi's Restaurant currently met the City Code requirements
for parking without the expansion. Hallett asked Staff if the
City Code should be adjusted to require more parking spaces
for restaurants. Uram replied that from the beginning, Staff
had indicated that additional parking may be necessary;
however, the project did meet City Code. Uram added that 1
parking space per 3 seats might be too lenient and should be
looked at further. Hallett stated that he was concerned about
the parking issue related to restaurants proposing to develop
in the future.
Norman asked what would happen to the parcel if Chi-Chi's
Restaurant did not develop the parking lot. Mitchell replied
that the property was owned by the landlord, Lariat Companies,
which planned to develop the lot in the future.
MOT/ON 1:
Hallett moved, seconded by Norman to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 4-0-0.
MOTION 2:
Hallett moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Consul Restaurant
Corporation for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment to
the overall Preserve Commercial Park South Planned Unit
Development Concept on 2.23 acres for expansion of the Chi
Chi's Restaurant parking lot, based on plans dated June 19,
1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
June 22, 1990.
Hallett asked if there would be any problem by approving the
proposal when the proponent had indicated that it may not
proceed. Uram replied that Staff had understood that the
proponent would proceed immediately with the project; however,
since the project currently met City Code requirements it
would not make a difference if the proponent did not proceed.
Motion carried 4-0-0.
MOTXON 3:
Hallett moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Consul Restaurant
Corporation for Site Plan Review for the Chi Chi's Restaurant
parking lot expansion, based on plans dated June 19, 1990,
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June
22, 1990.
Bye concurred that the parking requirements per City Code
should be given further consideration for future developments.
Motion carried 4-0-0.
VAC1 90-06
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-174
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON
LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 3, YORKSHIRE POINT
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility
easements described as follows:
The drainage and utility easements on Lots 11 and 12, Block 3,
Yorkshire Point according to the plat thereof recorded in the
office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 10, 1990 after due
notice was published and posted as required by law;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility
easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public,
therefore, should%be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described
are hereby vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of
proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 1990
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
iJ•Cr
n•n
.7
JULY 10.1990
60579
60580
. 581
60582
60583
JUDY LIEBER
LISA HEATHCOTE
STEVE BUDAS
LIVE THEATRE ENTERTAINMENT NETWOR
VOID OUT CHECK
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING
GRAND OPENING
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING
GRAND OPENING
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING
GRAND OPENING
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING
GRAND OPENING
LAKE AMPHITHEATER
LAKE AMPHITHEATER
LAKE AMPITHEATER
LAKE AMPHITHEATER
150.00
300.00
150.00
195.00
0.00
60584 WILLIAM A LUSE
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER
150.00
GRAND OPENING
60586 RICHARD ALAN PRODUCTIONS
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER
425.00
GRAND OPENING
60586 MARK ALAN AGENCY
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER
1000.00
GRAND OPENING
60587 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00
60588 TOM SYNDER -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER 250.00
GRAND OPENING
60589 MINNESOTA SINFONIA
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER 1000.00
GRAND OPENING
60590 STEPPINGSTONE THEATRE
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER 150.00
GRAND OPENING
60591 U S OLYMPIC FESTIVAL '90 -OPENING CEREMONIES TICKETS FOR MOST 46.00
-CREATIVE TORCH RUN PRIZE-RECREATION
ADMINISTRATION
60592 U S OLYMPIC FESTIVAL '90
-OPENING CEREMONIES TICKETS-PRIZES-JULY 46.00
4TH CELEBRATION
60593 WORD PERFECT -PRINTER DISK FREIGHT CHARGES-ENGINEERING 10.00
DEFT
594 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
MAY 90 SALES TAX 17810.31
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
1ST HALF OF JUNE '90 ESTIMATED SALES TAX 11850.00
60596 DEPT OF THE TREASURY
PAYROLL 458.30
60597 STATE OF MN
BIKE REGISTRATIONS 150.00
60598 BLACK'S PHOTOGRAPY -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-SEWER DEPT/HUMAN 78.79
-RESOURCES DEPT/ASSESSING DEPT/POLICE DEPT/
-HISTORICAL INTERPREATION DEPT/FORESTRY
DEFT
60599 C&H DISTRIBUTORS INC
CLAMPS-WATER DEPT 196.27
60600 JOHN FRANS
MAY '90 EXPENSES-FINANCE DEFT 200.00
60601 ICMA
DUES-ADMINISTRATION DEFT 309.75
60602 KEVIN SCHMIEG
MAY '90 EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 200.00
60603 SIGN-TIFIC
SIGNS-POLICE DEPT 200.00
60604 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
SERVICE 3727.60
60605 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
SERVICE 15610.74
60606 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV
SERVICE 47.84
60607 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS
SERVICE 5415.25
60608 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 55.25
60609 U S WEST CELLULAR INC
SERVICE 50.00
60610 BELL ATLANTIC TRICON LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 358.68
60611 PROFILE 'EVALUATIONS INC
CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 80.00
60612 MINNESOTA TRUCKING ASSN
CONFERENCE-STREET DEFT 135.00
60613 ORCHESTRA HALL
ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 352.00
60614 TRUSTEE-MPTF -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES- 1891.20
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
'1615 EDEN PRAIRIE SNOWDRIFTERS
-REIMBURSEMENT FOR SNOWDRIFTERS CLUB FROM 166.53
STATE OF MINNESOTA
6321551
60616 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
MAY '90 FUEL TAX
151.20 60617 MARK SMITH -LOSSIAH -REFUND-OVERPAYMENT OF VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE
50.00
FEE
300.00
7.00
9.00
33.00
11.00
17.00
11.00
25.00
15.25
18.25
110.00
19.00
7.00
19.00
45.00
33.00
13.00
13.00
80.00
19.00
20.00
15.00
25.00
27.00
17.00
96.00
83.20
120.00
65.00
30.00
30.00
75.00
2.00
16.50
16.50
310.66
77.75
27.00
59278.45
12197.89
74.00
275.00
PETTY CASH CHANGE FUND FOR SUMMER PLAYGROUND PROGRAMS
JOE ASSELMEIER REFUND-SAFETY CAMP
ERIC CAMERON REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
ANITA DE VAN REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
NANCY DONOVAN REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
VICKI RIDE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
JOAN FINCH REFUND-SAILING LESSONS
MARIE MDLEY REFUND-TEAM TENNIS TRAINING
AMY GEARING REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
ANNE GUTTMAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
BARBAR HEGARTY REFUND-ROOT RIVER CANOE TRIP
JUDY LA CON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
DIANE LUSIAN REFUND-WEARABLE ART-SUMMER LEISURE PROGRAM
CORINNE MORRIS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
CANDY PETERSON REFUND-DAY CAMP
LEANNE PETERSON REFUND-GOLF LESSONS
JACOB PORTER REFUND-T-BALL LEAGUE FEE
SAMUEL PORTER REFUND-T-BALL LEAGUE FEE
NANCY PUDAS REFUND-HOCKEY SCHOOL
MARY RENZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
SUSAN ROBERTS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
DEB SHANTZ REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS
SHEPARD OF THE PRAIRIE REFUND-STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL
LINDA WILSON REFUND-SKATING LESSONS
LORI WOLTERSTORFF REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
MINNESOTA MINS NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM/FEES PAID
HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-SENIOR NEWSLETTER
CIRCUS PIZZA TEEN WORK PROGRAM/FEES PAID
CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS/FEES PAID
STATE TREASURER STATE OF MINNESOT LICENSES-WATER DEPT
STATE TREASURER LICENSE-SEWER DEPT
BRADLEY PRODUCTIONS INC DEPOSIT-ENTERTAINMENT-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION
ETHEL DONET -REFUND-STREET OF DREAMS TOUR-SENIOR
PROGRAMS
MARK MUCCI REFUND-ROUND LAKE PARK BUILDING RENTAL
KAY HEINBOCKEL REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK BUILDING RENTAL
MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR CTR
DONNA M ROLLER MILEAGE/EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
BACHMAN'S EXPENSES-AWARDS BANQUET-CITY COUNCIL
FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 6/15/90
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 6/15/90
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS
CYRIL PAUL ENSEMBLE -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES-
60618
60619
( 520
,621
60622
80623
60624
60625
60626
80627
80828
60629
60630
60631
60632
80633
60634
60635
60636
60637
60638
60639
60640
60641
60642
60643
60644
14)645
( 348
60648
60649
60650
60651
60652
60653
60654
60655
60656
60657
60658
60659
60660 JEROME J FLYNN
60661 TOM KOCH
60662 FEIST BLANCHARD CO
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES-
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES-
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
-VALVES/HOSES/BELTS/BRAKE SHOES/SHOCKS/
-FUEL PUMP/COIL/BEARINGS/HARNESSES/MIRRORS/
-00NNECTORS/REGULATORS/LUBRICATOR/LAMPS/
FLASHERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
500.00
300.00
1338.45
( .502110
-WRENCHES/PUNCH & CHISEL SETS/SLED HAMMERS/
1079.39
VISES/PLIERS/MEASURING TAPE-FIRE DEFT
LICENSES-LIQUOR STORES 80.00
EASEMENT-CEDAR RIDGE STORM SEWER 2200.00
PRINTING-FLYERS-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 697.80
-ENTERTAINMENT-TORCH RUN-RECREATION 150.00
ADMINISTRATION
DEPOSIT-ENTERTAINMENT-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 500.00
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES- 400.00
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
-SERVICE-SOUND SYSTEM-STARING LAKE CONCERT 90.00
SERIES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES- 500.00
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
-ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LAKE CONCERT SERIES- 400.00
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
CONFERENCE-FALL SKILL DEVELOPMENT 42.00
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 18.50
MOTOR VEHILE REGISTRATION 801.84
LIABILITY INSURANCE 113432.00
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 186.00
PAYROLL 6/15/90 4849.60
JUNE '90 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 2709.45
CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 194.76
PAYROLL 6/15/90 2014.04
PAYROLL 6/15/90 32.00
JUNE '90 UNION DUES 1033.00
JULY '90 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 15140.20
PAYROLL 6/15/90 25.00
JUNE '90 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM 2688.78
PAYROLLS 6/1/90 & 6/15/90 1060.00
PAYROLL 6/15/90 29935.80
JULY '90 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 32430.34
PAYROLL 6/15/90 209.50
LIQUOR 1448.60
LIQUOR 13880.07
WINE 11490.94
WINE 254.75
LIQUOR 5445.69
WINE 1419.21
LIQUOR 5649.66
TEEN WORK PROGRAM/FEES PAID 63.00
-ACQUISTION OF LAND FOR RILEY LAKE PARK 442293.95
ADDITION
-SOD CUTTER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE/ROLL 83.63
-OF TABLE COVER/RIBBON-ICE SHOW-COMMUNITY
CENTER
DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 168.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 488.88
PAGER SERVICE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 14.00
EXPENSES-CITY HALL/FIRE DEPT 60.50
SIGNS-STREET DEPT 47.71
CHEMICALS-PARK MAINTENANCE 359.00
-T-SHIRTS-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/TENNIS 1797.15
LESSONS
60663 SEARS
60664 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
60665 ROBERT ARP
`666 DAN & DAN'S MINUTEMAN PRESS
J667 BRADLEY PRODUCTIONS
60668 JIMMY ALLEN ARTIST MGMT LTD
60669 BOB WALSER
60670 DAVID KOITKE
60671 MARK ALAN AGENCY
60672 MARY ANN O'DOUGHERTY
60673 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN
60674 MN DEPT OF P/S
60675 MN DEPT OF P/S
60676 LMCIT
60677 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
60678 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO
60679 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY
60680 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER
60681 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
60682 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
60683 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG
60684 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC
60685 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION
60686 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE
687 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS
.4688 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
60689 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN
60690 UNITED WAY
60691 EAGLE WINE CO
60692 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC
60693 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
60694 PAUSTIS & SONS CO
60695 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO
60696 PRIOR WINE CO
60697 QUALITY WINE CO
60698 U A THEATRES
60699 ELAINE JACQUES
60700 A TO 2 RENTAL CENTER
60701 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING
60702 ACRO -MINNESOTA INC
60703 AIRSIGNAL INC
60704 ANDERSON'S GARDEN
60705 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC
60706 ANDROC PRODUCTS INC
60707 ARTISANS INC
:9786474
80708 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -HEADLIGHTS/BATTERIES/POWER STEERING FLUID/ 578.28
WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID-EQUIPMENT MAINT
60709 BELL ATLANTIC TRICON LEASING CORP COPIER LEASE PAYMENT-POLICE DEPT 358.68
60710 JOHN BENSON GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 480.00
( '11 BERGIN AUTO BODY INC PAINT & REPAIR VEHICLES-EQUIPMENT MAINT 304.00
BERRY COFFEE COMPANY SERVICE-CITY HALL 666.00
60713 BRUCE BETTENDORF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 279.00
60714 BEI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS SERVICE-ANIMAL CONTROL 24.00
60715 MINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 139.16
60716 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 2303.65
60717 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON -APRIL & MAY '90 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE- 1287.00
ANIMAL CONTROL
60718 uns BOETTCHER -MINUTES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION/ 168.50
PARK RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM
60719 'IT)BY BOYUM HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 180.00
60720 REBECCA BRAZYS MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL 150.00
60721 ED BRION SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 225.00
60722 BROADWAY SIGNS & SPECIALTIES PLAQUES/TROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 268.10
60723 MAXINE BRUECK EXPENSES/MILEAGE-FINANCE DEPT 72.89
60724 BIN SPORTS -MEASURING TAPES/BALL NETS/WHISTLES/WIFFLE 263.14
-BALLS/BATS-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/SPORTS/
SPECIAL CAMPS
60725 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC -MAY '90 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE-HUMAN 445.00
RESOURCES DEPT
60726 CAF1SON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO BLADE/LINK/PIN/MOWER-$2940.00 -PARK MAINT 2982.68
60727 CARLSON'S TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL-FORESTRY DEPT 575.00
60728 CIMLINE INC HOSE/COVER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 382.00
60729 JAMS G CLARK JUNE '90 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 219.02
60730 CLEAN SWEEP INC SERVICE-STREET SWEEPING-STREET MAINTENANCE 12521.62
on731 OXIMERCIAL ASPHALT CO BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 3539.08
732 (MUTER BUYING SERVICE -COMPUTER REPAIR DUE TO LIGHTNING DAMAGE- 3768.00
POLICE DEPT
60733 CONCRETE RAISING INC CURBING SERVICE-DRAINAGE CONTROL DEPT 6580.00
60734 amTRucrIoN MATERIALS INC SEALCOATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 2160.00
60735 CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC -RADIO REPAIRS DUE TO LIGHTNING DAMAGE- 699.20
POLICE DEPT
60736 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC JUNE '90 SERVICE-INSURANCE CONSULTANT 560.00
60737 CORPORATE VIDEO -2ND OF THREE PAYMENTS FOR VIDEO-FLYING 4502.05
CLOUD LANDFILL
60738 CULLIGAN SERVICE 29.90
60739 CUMIINS DIESEL SALES INC VALVES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14.85
60740 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC -CONNECTIONS/DRILL BITS/WIRE TIES/SCREWS- 178.99
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
60741 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC HYDRAULIC PUMP-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 295.00
60742 CUSTOM AUTOBODY PAINT & REPAIR TOOL BOX-EQUIPMENT MAINT 192.16
60743 WILLIAM DAGGETT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 286.00
60744 WARD F DAHLBERG MAY '90 EXPENSES-LIQUOR STORES 80.00
60745 DAN & DAN'S MINUTEMAN PRESS -PRINTING-PERMIT LABELS-BUILDING 63.95
INSPECTIONS DEPT
60746 MITCHELL DEAN MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE 12.50
60747 DELEGARD TOOL CO -THERMOSTAT/CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT 72.72
MAINTENANCE
60748 HERB DEROMA SERVICE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEFT 410.00
60749 DAN DESAULNIERS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 178.50
'849562
JULY 10.1990
60750 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU
( '51 DRISKILLS SUPER vALU
DUNLOP SLAZENTER CORPORATION
60753 DUSTCOATING INC
60754 EDEN PRAIRIE LIQUOR
60755 DEB EDLUND
60756 CHRIS ENGER
60757 FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB
60758 FLOYD SECURITY
60759 FOX MCCUE & MURPHY
60760 DEE FUNK
60761 G T LAWN SERVICE
60762 GETTING TO KNOW YOU
60763 JOSEPH GLEASON
60764 CHARLES A GOBLE
60765 GOVERNMENT DATA PUBLICATIONS
60766 MARK GRANOWSKI
60767 BRADLEY GRAY
60768 HALE COMPANY INC
60769 HARMON GLASS
60770 HAZARD CONTROL INC
60771 HEELS ON WHEELS
60772 LAURIE HELLING
60773 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
60774 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
0,1 775 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
'76 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
641777 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
60778 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
60779 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
60780 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
60781 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
60782 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
60783 D C HEY COMPANY INC
60784 HOFFERS INC
60785 EARL HOLASEK & SONS GREENHOUSES I
60786 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES
60787 NANCY HOVEY
60788 ROBERT E HOWARD
60789 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272
60790 INTL ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE
60791 INSTY-PRINTS
60792 INTL OFFICE SYSTEMS INC
( 793
,794 MICHAEL W JACQUES
GARY ISAACS
2356969
-EXPENSES-CITY HALL/OUTDOOR CENTER
PROGRAMS/NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT
T -BALLS-SUMMER SKILL DEVELOPMENT
DUSTCOATING-PARK MAINTENANCE
EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEFT
MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNK '90 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT
EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL
-3RD QUARTER '90 SECURITY SYSTEM-LIQUOR
STORE
1989 AUDIT SERVICE
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
MAY '90 LAWN SERVICE
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES
HOCKEY & SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
BAGS-FOLICE DEPT
BOOK-PARK & RECREATION DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
FUEL PUMP REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SLIDING BACKGLASS -EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
RAIN SUITS/WELDING GLOVES-PARK MAINTENANCE
UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT
MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
-CITY'S SHARE OF STATE DEED TAX FOR
-PURCHASE OF JACQUES PROPERTY FOR RILEY
LAKE PARK ADDITION
FILING FEE-PLANNING DEFT
-FILING FEE FOR ACQUISTION OF TAX
FORFEITED PROPERTY-PARK MAINTENANCE
SCHOOL-FIRE DEFT
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINT
FIELD MARKING PAINT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FLOWER PLANTS-PARK MAINTENANCE
-3RD QUARTER '90 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINT-
LIQUOR STORE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-VAN DRIVER SERVICE-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL
COMMISSION
-ROOM RENTAL-ADULT PROGRAMS/ART & MUSIC/
-PAPER TOWELS/TRASH BAGS/CLEANING SUPPLIES/
LIGHT BULBS-SENIOR CENTER
TRAINING MATERIAL/CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
-PRINTING-BROCHURES/RUBBER STAMP-POLICE
DEPT
JUNE '90 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL
BROOMBALL OFFICIAL & COORDINATOR/FEES PAID
MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE
72.08
21.82
78.95
962.00
123.20
125.00
200.00
26.79
398.00
13000.00
16.94
250.00
125.40
424.00
90.00
84.95
62.00
106.00
87.65
168.00
155.00
36.00
42.50
42.24
190.00
56.00
85.72
29.60
40.66
1464.32
358.00
16.65
1110.00
53.23
393.00
391.50
441.31
217.00
25.00
308.68
278.05
155.45
156.00
1091.00
10.00
60795
60796
60797
( 798
.,799
60800
JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC
TOM KEEFE
RON KIRSCH
BRADLEY J marsoN
KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC
KRAEMER'S HOME CENTER
JULY 10.1990
OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 22.21
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 62.00
VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 216.00
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 186.50
VOLLEYBALL NETS-PARK MAINTENANCE 108.00
-CLAMPS/WASHERS/ELECTRICAL BOX/HANDLE/PICK/ 147.31
-FITTINGS/TROWEL/TAPES/NOZZLIES/VALVES/
-FAINT/BATTERIES/BUNGEE CORDS/CLEANING
-SUPPLIES/GAUGES/PAIL/CABLE/TARP/TOOLBOX/
-FUSE BOX/CIRCUIT BREAKERS-WATER DEPT/
POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GOGGLES/SIGN-SAFETY DEPT/POLICE DEPT 137.71
WINCH MOTOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 54.00
SHRUBS/FERTILIZER-FORESTRY DEPT/PARK MAINT 107.00
MARCH '90 LEGAL SERVICE-PROSECUTION 8105.00
MATS-LIQUOR STORE 27.20
-MAY '90 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 12165.82
LANDFILL
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 108.50
WHEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 195.25
EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 182.61
MASONITE/TIMBERS -STREET MAINTENANCE 125.60
CONTROL CABLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 20.68
MILEAGE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS 99.70
HEAD LAMP-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34.95
SUBSCRIPTION-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 69.00
STRESS TESTS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 225.00
-COMPUTER & PRINTER REPAIRS DUE TO 6495.00
-LIGHTNING DAMAGE/JULY '90 COMPUTER
SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT
1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEFT 168.10
-TYPESETTING/PRINTING-FLYERS-JULY 4TH 1113.35
CELEBRATION/AMPITHEATER GRAND OPENING
EXPENSES-SENIOR PROGRAMS/CITY HALL 32.33
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 279.00
-BOOK/PRUNING SHEARS/COMPASS/TREE PAINT- 570.46
FORESTRY DEPT
-JUNE '90 SERVICE-MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 5375.00
COMMISSION
MAY '90 SAC CHARGES 39204.00
JULY '90 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 161364.88
-JUNE '90 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 351.67
AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT/ID POUCHES-FIRE DEFT
BLACKTOP/SEALWATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 534.48
EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 10.50
SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEFT 125.61
-GLOVES/NOMEX HOODS/NUMBERS & LETTERS-FIRE 1515.00
DEPT
MAY '90 BUILDING SURCHARGE 4829.49
ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 850.20
-REPLACED TENNIS SHOES DUE TO DAMAGE FROM 54.99
OIL SPILL-POLICE DEPT
RADIO REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 555.00
BRUSHES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 19.05
DUES-FIRE DEPT 75.00
80801 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
60802 LAHASS CORP
60803 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER
60804 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
60805 LBEF BROS INC
60806 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
60807 JAMES R LININGER
60808 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC
60809 LUNDS
60810 LYMAN LUMBER CO
60811 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
60812 RODERICK MACRAE
60813 MARK'S EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO
60814 MARKETING RECREATION CLASSES
60815 MARTIN-MCALLISTER
60816 MASYS CORPORATION
o0817 MATRIX MEDICAL INC
60818 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS
60819 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
60820 CARLSTON B MCKENZIE III
60821 BEN MEADOWS COMPANY INC
60822 MRSSERLI & KRAMER
60823 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS
60824 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS
60825 MID-CO SECURITY SYTEMS INC
60826 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
60827 BRAD MILES
60828 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSN OF REALTORS
80829 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
60830 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER
60831 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
60832 JAMES S MORROW
60833 MOTOROLA INC
60834 NASCO
( 335 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN
24592315
JULY 10.1990
60836 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
60837 BETH NILSSON SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
,60838 NORTH STAR SOUND INC -INSTALLATION OF CABLING/PANELS/JACKS/BOX
-COVERS FOR SOUND SYSTEM-STARING LAKE
AMP ITHEATER
60839 NORTHWOOD GAS CO SAFETY VALVE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
60840 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC TYPEWRITER REPAIR-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
60841 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC -CHAIN/GRAB HOOKS/LOAD BINDERS-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
60842 PARAGON CABLE RELOCATE OUTLET-COMMUNITY CENTER
60843 NANCE LEE PETERSON AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID
60844 PICHA GREENHOUSE FLOWER PLANTS-PARK MAINTENANCE
60845 PIONEER MIDWEST INC PARTS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM-WATER DEPT
60846 PITNEY BOWES INC -3RD QUARTER POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY
-HALL/POSTAGE BY PHONE METER RENTAL-POLICE
DEPT
60847 POKORNY COMPANY SEATS-FACILITIES DEPT 47.50
60848 PRAIRIE HARDWARE SCREWS/KEY/BRUSHES/BUCKETS-FIRE DEPT 82.17
60849 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN -BLADE FASTENERS/GAS CAP/RIDING LAWN MOWER- 3425.07
-$3200.00-WATER DEPT/OIL/DIPSTICK/LAWN
-TRACTOR REPAIR-FACILITIES DEFT/CABLE -
PARK MAINTENANCE
80850 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING -PRINTING-HOMESTEAD APPLICATION CARDS &
ENVELOPES -ASSESSING DEPT
FRAME-POLICE DEPT
LIABILITY INSURANCE
TELEPHONE SERVICE-FACILITIES DEPT
WATER PUMP REPAIR-PARK MAINTENANCE
-VIDEO TAPES-CITY COUNCIL/CASSETTES/
NETWORK HARI:MARE -POLICE DEPT
EMPLOYEE WATCH STICKERS-POLICE DEPT
-KEYS/CASH REGISTER TAPE/CASH REGISTER
REPAIR-LIQUOR STORE
60858 MICHAEL RIGGLE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
60859 ROAD SERVICE SUPPLY SIDE SWEEPER BRUSH-PARK MAINTENANCE
60860 ROOT-O-MATIC WATER CLOSET REPAIR-PARK MAINTENANCE
60861 DEBORAH K RONGLIEN PRINTING-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
60862 ROD RUE LICENSE-ENGINEERING DEPT'
60863 SAFETY -KLEEN CORPORATION TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTTPARK MAINT
60864 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/
COMMUNITY CENTER
60865 JOHN SANS MILEAGE/EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
60866 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC -CONFERENCE/CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES
DEPT/STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE
60867 SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN SLED WORKS INC -CANOE PACKS/COOKING GEAR-OUTDOOR CENTER
PROGRAMS
60868 WILBUR W SCHULTZ sonstal OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 186.00
60869 DALE SCHMIDT EXPENSES-STREET DEFT 12.00
60870 SIGN -TIFIC BANNERS-POLICE DEPT 100.00
60871 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO -FIRE ALARM REPAIR DUE TO LIGHTNING DAMAGE- 233.70
60872 STEVEN R SINELL
60873 W GORDON SMITH CO
60874 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC
( 675 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
1911669
POLICE DEFT
JUNE '90 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT
FILTERS-COMMUNITY CENTER
EXPENSES-POLICE DEFT
SOCKETS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
214.00
17.28
17.79
18.85
119.07
199.20
317.10
119.55
85.00
106.88
32.50
271.32
1104.50
172.80
219.75
47.60
60851 PRAIRIE VIEW FRAMING CO
60852 J A PRICE AGENCY INC
60853' PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC
60854 R&R MARINE
”n855 RADIO SHACK
60856 RC IDENTIFICATIONS INC
60857 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN
78.90
8911.00
247.50
124,40
90.46
368.44
760.97
15.50
164.30
114.73
31.85
58.00
140.75
225.94
19.00
281.82
315.50
:•)A
60887 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC
60888 NATALIE SWAGGERT
60889 TARGET STORES
60890 THE TEACHERS PET
60891 TECHNICAL ADVISORY SERVICE INC
60892 TEXGAS
60893 TIM'S QUALITY PLUMBING
60894 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC
60895 E JOHN TROMBLEY
396 VICOM INC
60897 CLARK WALKER
60898 KEITH WALL
60899 WATER PRODUCTS CO
60900 PAUL WELIN
60901 WEST WELD
60902 WINSLOW PRINTING COMPANY INC
60903 MARIE WITTENBERG
60904 WILS XKP INC
60905 JACK WOODS
60906 THE WORK CONNECTION
60907 ZACK'S INC
60908 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
60909 EARL ZENT
60135 VOID OUT CHECK
60350 VOID OUT CHECK
60360 VOID OUT CHECK
60470 VOID OUT CHECK
60544 VOID OUT CHECK
60674 VOID OUT CHECK
(- '437270
-1ST QUARTER '90 SERVICE-HUMAN SERVICES
DEPT
-4TH PAYMENT FOR PROGRAMMING/3RD QUARTER
'90 SERVICE
-LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT/HAPPENINGS-
COMMUNITY CENTER/ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE
EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER
VOLLEYBALLS/BALL BAGS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
RIBBON-FINANCE DEPT
ADVERTISING-POLICE AUCTION
EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
DISTRIBUTION OF FORFEITURE FUNDS
-BATTERY STACKS/MOUTHPIECES/AMMUNITION/
-MICROPHONE ACCESSORY KITS/GUN RACK LOCK/
-LAMPS/SCREWS/WASHERS/NUTS/BALLISTIC VEST -
$384.75-POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
WASTE DISPOSAL-OUTDOOR CENTER OPERATIONS
JUNE '90 EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
-2 TV'S-$549.98 -WATER DEPT/PICTURE FRAMES-
-CITY COUNCIL/FILE CABINET/GARBAGE CAN/
STAPLER-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
TOYS-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
MAY '90 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL
GAS CYLINDERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
-FINGER PAINTS/MARKER SETS/CLIPBOARDS/
GLITTER/GLUE-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-JUNE '90 WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-
ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
JUNE '90 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT
-GAUGES/REMOTE READERS/TUBING CUTTERS/
-CUTTER WHEELS/ROD EXTENSIONS/NOZZLE CAP/
-CHAINS/GASKETS/CURB BOXES/FITTINGS/VALVES/
-COTTER PINS/OIL/300 CABLES-WATER DEPT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SOFTMLLOFFICIAL/FEES PAID
GRINDING WHEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES-CITY HALL
REFUND-ABATEMENT FEE
DUES-PARK PLANNING DEPT
GARDEN MARKERS -OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS
SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE
OVERHEAD GRAB HOOKS/CHAIN-EQUIPMENT MAINT
1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/SAFETY DEPT
EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEFT
3750.00
9668.75
5681.52
101.00
170.05
78.54
80.00
371.49
57.66
185.57
1033.89
86.23
200.00
627.89
28.80
293.90
116.52
6.00
209.49
309.50
102.00
325.50
200.00
2489.34
116.50
40.77
1111.62
5.00
20.00
52.44
1152.00
159.28
240.30
14.00
4287.50-
26.79-
49.00-
311.06-
20.00-
16.50-
JULY 10.1990
60876 SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COU
60877 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI
378 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
60879 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC
60880 SPORTS WORLD USA
60861 THE STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY
60882 STAR TRIBUNE
60883 STARS RESTAURANT
60884 STATE OF MINNESOTA
60885 STATE OF MINNESOTA
60886 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE HQ
$1198581.20
DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS
10 GENERAL 431782.81
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 2286.66
15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 37178.71
17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 36077.97
20 CEMETERY OPERATIONS 250.00
31 PARK ACGUIST & DEVELOP 444758.27
51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 2200.00
73 WATER FUND 65721.31
77 SEWER FUND 161906.12
80 POLICE CONFISCATED FDS 687.45
81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 10226.39
86 PARK PROG-CONTRIBUTIONS 128.51
88 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE 5375.00
$1198581.20
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 90-175
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND
ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT
WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make
the following improvements:
I.C. 52-203 - Utility and Street Improvements for Staring
Lane and Ridge Road and vicinity
and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost
of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
That the proposed improvements be referred to the City
Engineer for study with the assistance of R.C.M., INC. and
that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to
the City Council with all convenient speed advising the
Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment
and feasibility of the proposed improvements.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 10, 1990.
Gary D. Peterson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
Names of Petitioners
(Must BROProwly_Owners) /LAW
-ANIEgir
JJ
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council
to consider making the followng described improvement(s):
(General Location)
Sanitary Sewer (47;:latermain
\\,//:,,Storm Sewer
Street Paving
Other
Street Address of Other
Legal Description of
Property to be Served
,o;!I 60 . 76e-hoe= 4:4 .
Ic(81 a.aa
c-T6o
clo31 141. 5-ta n ;-, 7 NI
0"0 6/1 si/ii,./;.n4 dA)<--.
fos-/ 5 ,--AreliQG
?It( e 5 f-Ae Apvf
St; r • / C. , PI) •
Iqqt71
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project No. 203
Council Consideration C -.),,LY /0, 1990
Street Address of Other
Legal Description of
Property to be Served
Names 61,Teti
(Must eAProp
loners,
rt
9 18 1
/5 0
J
c-/ p
•;/5 , r t?1,../6 /1/41
.411WO
4_ '>4L-- ,:r„,.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
To The Eden Prairie City Council:
The undersigned property owners herein petition the Eden Prairie City Council
to consider making the followng described improvement(s):
(General Location)
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Storm Sewer
Street Paving
Other
(For City Use)
Date Received
Project No.
Council Consideration s•--jtj } 9 g 3