Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 06/19/1990TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 1990 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock and Douglas Tenpas City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Rebecca Brazys PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, June 5 2. 1990 III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Final Plat Approval of Bentec Addition (located at the northwest corner of Yorkshire Lane and Pioneer Trail) Resolution No. 90-160 C. Approve TH 212 E.I.S Supplemental Agreement No. 3 (Resolution No. 90-169) D. Approve Plans and Specifications for Utility and Street Improvements in Bluffs East 7th Addition I.C. 52-197 (Resolution No. 90-163) E. Approve Plans and Specifications for Community Center Trunk Watermain Improvements, I.C. 52-188 (Resolution No. 90=UTIT F. Resolution Clarifying Which Persons are Entitled to Workers Compensation and Rescinding WEET6fion kET-WOTResolutIon No. 90-168) G. Approval of Personnel Policy (Resolution No. 90-170) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE by Holtze Brothers Development Company. Request-TOT-PliFined Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.6 acres, Zoning District Change from Office and C-Reg to C- Reg-Ser on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.2 acres into one lot and one outlot for construction of a 220 unit hotel development. Location: Southwest corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle. (Ordinance No. 23-90-PUD -10-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-165 - Preliminary Plat) Page 1363 Page 1383 Page 1384 Page 1386 Page 1393 Page 1394 Page 1395 Page 1398 Page 1399 City Council Agenda - 2 - Tues.,June 19, 1990 B. VILLAGE KNOLLS by Argus Development. Request for Planned Unit Page 1422 Development Concept Review on 42.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 District on 8.7 acres. Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single family Tots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for a residential development. Location: East of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive. (Resolution No. 90-166 - PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 21-90-PUD-9-90 - PUD District and Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-167 - Preliminary Plat) C. BENTEC by Bentec Engineering Corporation. Request for Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review within the Office Zoning District on 1.85 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals for construction of a 1900 square foot addition to the Bentec Engineering building. Location: 13050 Pioneer Trail. (Ordinance No. 24-90 - Zoning District Amendment) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS REQUESTS & COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition from Eden Prairie Citizens Effected by Western North Lake Riley, Residential Segment for TT2I2—ind request foTIMRincil to review the need for better communication of City matters VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Waste Management Commission - Packagina Ordinance IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Set Joint Meeting with the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission 2. Summer Vacation Schedules for Councilmembers B. Report of City Manager 1. Excess Liability Coverage C. Report of City Attorney D. Report of Director of Planning E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources F. Report of Finance Director G. Report of Director of Public Works XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT Page 1444 Page 1447 Page 1448 Page 1454 Page 1455 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1990 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Gary Peterson, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, and Douglas Tenpas. City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Rober Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene A. Dietz, and Recording Secretary Rebecca Brazys. ROLL CALL: . All Members Present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris to approve that Agenda as published. AMENDMENTS Add to Consent Calendar Clerk's License: A request for peddler's license for James Cameron for the Bluebell Ice Cream Truck. Remove from Consent Calendar Item III M, as it was not in proper order. Add Items X. A. 1-5. II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, September 19, 1989 MOTION: Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, Sepbember 19, 1989, as published and amended. CORRECTIONS: Page 17, Paragraph 1 Public Relations for City Awards should read: An effort should be made to have better public relations and to increase publicity when an award is received. Page 18, second to last paragraph, last sentence should read: Bertrand recommended that a spot be left open on the agenda for public comment. First sentence of the same paragraph should read: Bertrand believed that the decision made by the Council was a direct reflection on the American Legion Club and its operations. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes - 2 - June 5, 1990 B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 8, 1990 Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, May 8, 1990. Motion carried unanimously. C. Joint City Council/Landfill Advisory Committee Meeting held Monday, May 14, 1990 Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to approve the minutes of the Joint City Council/Landfill Advisory Committe Meeting held Monday, May 14, 1990 as amended. CORRECTIONS: On Page 1, Staff: should be an indication that Mr. Jullie arrived late for tnis meeting. Motion carried with Peterson and Anderson abstaining. D. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 15, 1990 Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to approve the minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, May 15, 1990 as amended. Page 8, second paragraph should read: Pidcock thanked Mr. Tenpas for bringing his relationship with the proponents to the forefront as she was questioning his participation at the Planning Commission after reading the minutes of its May 14 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. E. City Council Meeting held Wednesday, May 30, 1990 Anderson moved, Pidcock seconded to approve the minutes of the City Council Meeting held Wednesday, May 30, 1990, motion carried with Harris and Anderson abstaining. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Petition from Rustic Hills Neighborhood regarding Playground Improvements C. Trail Easement from Beach Road to Bryant Lake Park Harris asked if this meant that the Council would probably have to go to condemnation. Dietz responded yes, within two years. D. Approval of Reimbursement to Watershed District for Lake Riley Chain-of-Lakes Clean-up Project City Council Minutes - 3 - June 5, 1990 Harris asked if there was any hope of ever having this project completed and where Chanhassen stood on this issue. Dietz responded it is probably unlikely to move forward with the position of the current Chanhassen City Council. Harris asked if the City would have to go through this whole process again for another grant, to which Dietz responded yes. Harris asked what was the primary barrier to Chanhassen being able to obtain public access. Dietz responded that the property owners on the lake oppose the access and the Council agrees with their position. E. Receive Petition and Order Feasibility Study for Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements for East and West Sunrise Circle (RESOLUTION NO. 90-148) F. Approve Resolution Authorizing Permit Application for Connection to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Facilities (RESOLUTION NO. 90-149) G. Authorize Release of Land from Special Assessment Agreement Dated December 7, 1982 Associated with I.C. No. 52-038 H. Approve Final Plat of Brody Addition Located at the SW Corner of Eden Road and Glen Lane (Ciatti's and Frank's site) RESOLUTION NO. 90-153. I. Resolution Requesting Hennepin County Board to Restore Funding to Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center (RESOLUTION NO. 90-153) J. Approve Agreement with MnDOT for Construction of Detached Frontage Road south of T.H. 5 in Section 18 (RESOLUTION NO. 90-137) K. Award Contract for Construction of Detached Frontage Road south of T.H. 5 in Section 18, I.C. 52-177 (RESOLUTION NO. 90-146) L. Approve State Aid Agency Agreement with MnDOT (RESOLUTION NO. 90-147) M. Receive 100% Petition and Order Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements for Round Lake View located in the NW Corner of Valley View Road and Duck Lake Road (Resolution No. 90-151) (Removed from agenda.) N. Authorize Sewer Access (SAC) and Water Access (WAC) Charges to be specially assessed for 6850 Alpine Trail O. Award Bid for Re-roofing of the Senior Center P. RESOLUTION NO. 90-155, Amending the Industrial Development Bond for Bryant Lake Partners Project (Evergreen) Jullie stated it was the Council's policy since 1986 to charge 1/8 of a point on refinancings and restructuring of industrial revenue bonds or housing revenue bonds. In this case, this project was City Council Minutes - 4 - June 5, 1990 "grandfathered in" as it was approved just before that policy became effective, and this was basically a change in the interest rate only. As this proposal was not a full-blown restructuring, staff was recommending that the 1/8 point not be charged in this situation. Q. RESOLUTION NO. 90-156, Reallocating Connection Charges, User Fees and the Interest Thereon from the Utility Debt Service Fund to the Utility Reserve Fund R. RESOLUTION NO. 90-157, Transferring S. RESOLUTION NO. 90-158, Adopting the 1989 Final Budget Harris commended the staff for bringing in the 1989 budget $281,000 under the approved budget. T. RESOLUTION NO. 90-159, Transferring Surplus Balances from Construction Funds to their Debt Service Funds. U. Eden Prairie Funeral Home by Marcus Corporation. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-118, Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial on 0.95 acres; 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 29-89, Zoning District Change from RM-2.5 to Community Commercial on 0.95 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Eden Prairie Funeral Home; Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-119, Authorizing Summary of ORDINANCE NO. 29-89 and Ordering Publication of said summary; adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 90-120, approving Site Plan review. 0.95 acre for 1 lot for the construction of a funeral home. Location: Southwest corner of Terrey Pine Drive and County Road 4. (RESOLUTION NO. 90-118 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; ORDINANCE NO. 29-89 - Rezoning; RESOLUTION NO. 90-119 - Authorizing Summary and Publication; RESOLUTION NO. 90-120 - Approving Site Plan Review) Harrris asked if the proponents were still going forward with this project as she believed it had been withdrawn. Jullie responded they are requesting a zoning of the property so that if they find another operator who would be interested in developing the property for the same purpose, they can proceed. Peterson asked if it would be legal for the Council to withhold the resolution until it was sure what will be done with the property. The Council would not face the possibility of rezoning the property now and then see it developed for a different use. Pauly stated the rezoning process included the adoption of a developer's agreement, which provided a safeguard. Also, one incentive to proceed with rezoning was the amount of time involved in the process. From a practical point of view it would be best to proceed, and if they did not develop the property in accordance with the agreement, then to rezone it at that time. City Council Minutes - 5 - June 5, 1990 Pidcock stated she did speak with the proponents and they indicated they were considering proceeding with their plans. V. Approve Agreement with MnDOT for State Aid Computer System (RESOLUTION NO. 90-154) MOTION: Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to approve Items A through V on the Consent Calendar, with the omission of Item M. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. EDEN PRAIRIE FORD by Shea Architects, Inc. Request for Zoning • District Change from Rural to C-Reg-Ser and Site Plan Review on 8.2 acres, with variance for outside storage to be reviewed by Board of Appeals, and Preliminary Plat of 24.6 acres into four (4) lots for construction of an automobile dealership. Location: North of Plaza Drive, west of Crown Auto. (Ordinance No. 20-90 - Rezoning; Resolution No. 90-141 - Preliminary Plat) Continued from May 15, 1990. Jullie reported all notices were properly published and mailed to surrounding property owners. Enger reported that according to the May 31st memo sent to the Council members, building exterior material elevations had been received, the lighting plan revised in accordance with the Council's direction for 3.5 average foot-candle rating across the lot, and no more than a 10 foot-candle rating at the 2600 square foot showcase area of the site. The storm drainage study indicated the hundred year flood elevation at 837.9, and the floodplain requirements should be able to be met within the site plan as drawn. Peterson asked about the concern previously expressed regarding the MnDOT alignment of Hwy. 212 and consequent realignment of Plaza Drive and how that would affect this site. Enger stated the MnDOT potential Hwy. 212 design was a late piece of information. This proposed alignment would come across the southern portion of this property and would move the existing Plaza Drive northern curb edge 40 feet further north. The proponents were not aware of this plan until last Thursday at which time they were given the preliminary information from the MnDOT's consulting engineer, BRW. They requested further time to think about this information. Two areas remained open, one being the operation of the dealership, and the other being what would be done about the conflict with this potential highway improvement. City Council Minutes - 6 - June 5, 1990 Don Brauer, representing the proponent, stated he spoke with the Assistant District Engineer in charge of Preliminary Design, and with Mr. Crawford, District Engineer. The 40 foot right-of-way project is an 1-494 project, not a Hwy. 212 project, and is in the EIS stage, not in preliminary design. The EIS is considering several alternatives. By the time the City was presented with actual preliminary plans, it may have some position about that 40 feet. He did not believe the Council should be concerned about a remote possibility of some design claiming that is really a small item in the 1-494 redesign. This was a BRW proposal of several alternatives to be incorporated in a massive EIS and would have no effect on the 1993 Prairie Center Drive interchange project. Pidcock asked if Brauer had discussed this with the Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition. Brauer responded he did, but the Coalition did not know anything about this project. Pidcock asked how the Hwy. 212 demonstration project, as proposed by Rep. Frenzel to congress, would impact this project. Dietz responded that Mr. Brauer was correct in that this is related to 1-494 and there was no official indication from MnDOT or the City of Eden Prairie whether this was a good idea. However, according to BRW, the volumes on the ramps Mr. Brauer referred to coming from westbound and southbound 1-494 onto westbound Hwy. 212 were at capacity. This planning did not interfere with the demonstration grant being proposed, but MnDOT may choose to look at right-of-way acquisition along with the Hwy. 212 project. The bid opening for that segment of Hwy. 212 was scheduled for January, 1993, and the EIS would be done in that period of time. In the Hwy. 212 plans developed to date, Plaza Drive would stay in the same location in front of this property. But the official mapping that has been approved by the Council went beyond the curb line, so there was a 40 foot shift in the curb line of Plaza Drive which was included in the official mapping. What was at issue was the need for another 15 feet for snow storage beyond the curb line. Brauer stated from the point of funding, this project was not funded now at all. Peterson was concerned that Mr. Brauer's initial comments were "scolding the Council" for thinking too far ahead. It was a function of the Council to incorporate all relative data and to evaluate the eventualities that could affect a project so that those projects enhance the city years from now. City Council Minutes - 7 - June 5, 1990 Brauer stated until the City had the entire project before it to consider, this should not be a concern as there were many alternatives and ramifications. David Shea, architect for the proponent, stated landscaping questions raised by the Council at the previous meeting concerned the size of the coniferous trees; they would increase from 8 to 10 feet. The lighting plans had been submitted and accepted by the planning staff. There would be 3.5 foot-candle rating in the parking area, a 10 foot-candle rating in the display areas, and a 0.5 foot-candle level at the property line at Plaza Drive. He presented a material board showing the exterior materials that will be used. Brauer stated the DNR had sent a letter stating the proposed construction of this project does not encroach upon the wetland area s6 no permit was required. They have a permit from the Corps of Engineers. The draining study requested by the city has been prepared, reviewed and accepted by the planning staff. Anderson expressed concern about the maintenance of the portion of the property in the flood plain area. Brauer responded that area will stay as it is today. It is basically a storm water conveying ditch and holding pond. It is necessary to convey the water from the larger holding pond from the larger city park property to the northwest to the culvert under 5 and 212. As far as the run-off from this site, there is already a siltation pond already built on the site which will be maintained. This project will be reviewed by the watershed district. Walter Bush, Denwal Management, stated they do have enough land to handle the right-of-way problem should it come up in the future, as they own property to the west where it may be possible to make adjustments if necessary. Denwal Management owns eight dealerships, seven in this area, and his dealerships do not use large, unsightly objects such as other dealerships use for advertising. He was aware this was the first dealership in Eden Prairie and that the Council was looking to set some standards for future dealerships. He stated he and his partners were willing to work with the City and meet those standards. This dealership would also offer a service department, which Eden Prairie does not now have and which would be a convenience to local residents. City Council Minutes - 8 - June 5, 1990 Anderson again expressed concern about the drainage area as he would like to see the area maintained and/or improved. Bush responded he believed the professionals could blend the drainage area to compliment the site. He stated he had spent a tremendous amount of money so far on this project and would be glad to cooperate with the City on this matter. Peterson asked how the auto industry planned to change its marketing strategies. Bush responded that marketing depended on the location of the dealership, but the current gimmicks being used by some dealers were probably a result of the slump in new car sales. Manufacturers did not dictate marketing strategies for dealers. • Peterson asked if there are things Brauer would recommend that would enhance the property, or would it be best to leave as is. Brauer responded the nature of that area would respond to the water level fluctuating widely; the most important thing to be done was to maintain that area where the water fluctuated. Peterson asked Enger to comment on the statement in Bush's letter regarding a small number of flagpoles on this site. Enger responded any number of flags are permitted under the current code to the extent that they are country, city, or state flags. A dealership flag would be considered a sign, as well as prices on car windshields. Balloons, whirling devices, search lights, etc. were limited to use at grand openings only. Mr. Bush had indicated he was willing to live with those provisions, but would like the Council to consider permitting three to four permits a year when such items would be permitted. Bush responded he did not intend to put up colored pennants, but would like to have political flags and to use search lights only for the grand opening(s). Harris stated this project had been in the design process for many months, the proponents had met the conditions requested by the planning staff, the proponents had responded to questions raised by the Council at its last meeting. Looking at this project as presented, cognizant of the fact that there may be a potential for future impact on 1-494 and Hwy. 212, but also recognizing that decision may be many months away, she was prepared to approve this project. There were no further comments from the audience. City Council Minutes - 9 - June 5, 1990 MOTION: Harris moved, Anderson seconded to close the public hearing and approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 21-90 approving the rezoning. Peterson stated he supported the motion with some trepidations, as there was still some level of concern that this dealership needed to set and maintain the standards of performance for years. Motion carried on a 4-0-1 vote with Tenpas abstaining. MOTION: Harris moved, Anderson seconded to adopt Resolution 90-106 approving the preliminary plat and direct staff to prepare development agreement incorporating Commission and staff • recommendations. Anderson stated the area that was going to be left in the natural state needed to be maintained and that the City will contact the developer if it is not being maintained. He would like the developer's agreement to include that at a future date the developer may participate with the City and the Watershed District for some kind of development of that area and that there is an irrigation system in all the berms. Motion carried on a 4-0-1 vote with Tenpas abstaining. MOTION: Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to grant an early grading permit with any work prior to second reading of Ordinance No. 21-90 be done at the developer's risk. Motion carried unanimously. B. WILSON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION by Ryan Properties, Inc. Request for Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plat of 22.57 acres into 3 lots for construction of additional parking spaces for the Americable buildings. Location: 7500 Flying Cloud Drive (Resolution No. 90-108 - Preliminary Plat) Jullie stated the notice for this hearing was mailed to 13 property owners in the project area and published in the May 23, 1990 issue of the Eden Prairie News. jg n City Council Minutes -10- June 5, 1990 Scott Smith, Commercial Manager of Ryan Properties, stated the proposal was to realign the property line slightly between the Wilson Ridge project and the Americable building to provide approximately 80 future parking stalls in the event of an increase the office portion of the Americable building to bring it into conformance with parking ratios. Enger stated the Planning Commission reviewed this item on May 14th and recommended on a 5 - 0 vote approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to staff recommendations of May 11. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to close the public hearing and • adopt Resolution 90-108 and direct staff to prepare development agreement incorporating Commission and staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. C. BOULDER POINTE WEST TOWNHOMES by David Carlson Companies for Zoning District Change from R1-22 to RM-6.5 on 8.26 acres, Site Plan Review on 8.26 acres, Preliminary Plat of 8.97 acres into 31 lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for construction of 30 duplex units. Location: Northeast corner of Pioneer Trail and Spring Road. (Ordinance No. 22-9 - Rezoning; and Resolution No. 90-106 - Preliminary Plat) Jullie reported notices were sent out to 27 property owners and published in May 23 issue of Eden Prairie News. David Carlson, David Carlson Companies, Inc., stated he was getting ready to begin construction on the Boulder Pointe homes in the price range of $220,000 to $350,000. Boulder Pointe West would offer a similar product in thirty townhomes, two homes per building, in the $120,000 to $130,000 range. There had been delays on this project as a result of the Mitchell Road alignment. Enger reported this item was reviewed at the May 14th Planning Commission meeting and the Commission recommended approval of this project according to the staff recommendations of May 11. Pidcock asked if this development will be similar to Saddlewood in Minnetonka. Carlson responded this would have larger homes with more attention to architectural features. M')), City Council Minutes -11- June 5, 1990 Jullie stated the Council received correspondence from the Metropolitan Airports Commission late today indicating that this area would be affected by the year 2010 Ldn 55 noise contour. Based upon Federal noise compatibilitiy criteria, residential land uses were generally compatible within this noise contour. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to close the public hearing and approve first reading of Ordinance No. 22-90 for rezoning. Motion carried unanimously. Pidc6Ck moved, Harris seconded to adopt Resolution 90-106 approving the preliminary plat and direct staff to prepare 4 developMent agreement incorporating Commission and staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to permit early grading permit with any work prior to the second reading of Ordinance No. 22-90 to be done at the developer's risk. Motion carried unanimously. D. GUIDE PLAN UPDATE (Resolution No. 90-127 - Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment) Jullie reported notice for this hearing was published in the May 23 Eden Prairie News. The Comprehensive Guide Plan Map was last updated in 1982 and several minor changes had been adopted by the Council and Metro Council since that time. Thirty-six specific changes had been made in addition to several changes regarding precise boundaries of each land use and contents of the legend. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the updated map and the Metro Council had also given its approval. Harris stated she was surprised at the change near the railroad from Industrial use to Residential. Enger responded that property has been zoned for 1-Gen for twenty-five years. Four or five years ago the Council zoned that to rural because the route for Hwy. 212 had changed and the area was no longer between future freeway and railroad tracks. The City had received proposals for residential development in that area and the Commission believed it was appropriate to remove the last indication of industrial in that part of the city. Peterson commended the staff for getting this job done. Pidcock asked for clarification of the statement: extended the medium density area to the hundred-year high water mark. City Council Minutes -12- June 5, 1990 Enger responded most of the changes that were not in a specific classification were graphic changes to reflect reality by moving designations to boundary or property lines. Also, the designation had been moved to a point where people can actually build behind the hundred-year elevation. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Anderson moved, Harris seconded to close the public hearing and adopt Resolution 90-127 approving the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to approve the payment of claims. Motion carried on a unanimous roll call vote. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from Pat Thompson, member of Senior Baseball Team Lambert reported this item was heard by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission at its May 21st and June 4th meetings. Pat Thompson was the manager of the Eden Prairie Senior Baseball Team and is requesting the Council allow this team to schedule games on the high school baseball field this year. He was required to make this request because in 1986 when the City gave $50,000 to the school district for the baseball and soccer fields, the neighbors were concerned about City play by adults on those fields which would result in increased traffic, noise, and balls being hit further. The Council restricted adult play completely from the northern-most fields. These fields were not playable until last year and, not realizing that was necessary, the adult team did play three or four games last year without authorization from the City. At the Parks Commission meeting, residents expressed concerns about the baseball and soccer fields with balls ending up in their yards, and with people climbing the fence to retrieve balls. The Park and Recreation staff did not believe it was a good idea to address the problem by restricting play, but would recommend design solutions. Lambert discussed several design solutions which could be discussed with the School District. /3-14 City Council Minutes -13- June 5, 1990 The Commission's recommendation was to request the Council to authorize the city staff to meet with the School District staff to discuss a design solution for netting behind the soccer fields and some kind of netting on the baseball fields to eliminate all foul balls from reaching private property and request that the School District respond within 30 days. The Commission also recommended the Council deny adult use of those fields until some kind of structure is installed. The intent was to get maximum use of these fields with minimum impact on the neighbors. The Commission also recommended the City and School District share the total estimated $15,000 cost for these corrections. John Pollock, 16460 No. Hillcrest Ct., stated he participated in the 1.986 planning for these fields; and since then, residents had experienced golf balls, soccer balls, and baseballs in their yard as well as children and adults coming into the yard. Some of these episodes had resulted in confrontations. The neighbors were adament that the safety concerns be addressed. Any changes in the soccer nets or baseball backstop netting would impact their property values, and they would like to have some opporunity to evaluate and comment on such proposals. Anderson commented those types of problems were inherent when any neighborhood was directly adjacent to a school or playground. He believed the City and School District ought to take some precautions, but the situation would not be completely eliminated. Harris asked if the school golf team used this field for practice. Lambert responded it had used it on occasion, but no longer did so as a result of the problems that occurred. Ed Steinbrook, 16671 North Hillcrest Court, stated he lived directly in back of the baseball diamond and expressed concern about the safety of his children playing in his back yard. He stated the neighborhood would have liked some sort of buffer zone between the fields and the neighborhood. The School District believed that because of the amount of land it had, it would be unable to put in a buffer zone. He believed the fields ought to be reoriented as he now had two to three balls in his yard per game. He stated the more people who use the field, the higher the probability that someone would be hit by a foul ball which would result in a liability issue. The neighborhood would like the school to be a good neighbor and did not want the suggestion of putting up the nets to be forgotten. He also questioned who was responsible for maintenance of the fields as the school had indicated the City should be responsible as its teams were using the field. He asked that the Council deny the request of the adult team. City Council Minutes -14- June 5, 1990 Pidcock asked if the residents had gone to the School Board. Steinbrook stated he has had conversations with Jerry McCoy, Steve Shultz, and Ray Mitchell of the School District staff. Mitchell did put in a series of poplars along the backstop to provide some privacy for the neighbors. McCoy directed his staff to look into some options, but nothing had yet developed. Patty Norby, 16420 North Hillcrest Court, also expressed concern about the safety issue. She related that residents were instructed by the police to keep any balls that landed in their yard as proof, but this advice had created conflict when they refused to return the balls to the owner. TenpaS commented the adult teams were not now using the fields, so the problems experienced by the neighbors were not the . responsibility of the adult group. Anderson stated he was at the soccer field recently and watched two kids climb over the fence to retrieve soccer balls. He questioned the wisdom of instructing residents to keep expensive soccer balls just because they land in their yards. Paul Pasqua, 13176 Cardinal Creek Road, stated he was a member of the adult senior team. He explained this team was organized in 1986 and in 1987 won the state amateur senior baseball tournament and championship. He explained that when they played teams in other communities, they played in premier fields. They have twenty players, eighteen who live in Eden Prairie, and they would only play four to five games on this field this year. Also, their games have only two outs per inning and are equivalent to five innings of a regulation baseball game. Their practices are held at the middle school or other locations. Anderson asked who used the baseball field in the summer and if there were maximum use of this field. Lambert responded the Babe Ruth team, American Legion, and Mickey Mantle with the fields being used seven days a week. John Bender, 7910 Eden Court, also a team member, referred to the problems they have incurred when trying to use other fields in Eden Prairie. Roger Swigart, 13183 Cardinal Creek Rd., another team member, stated he had sympathy for the neighbors and agreed something should be done to address their concerns. He pointed out that none of those concerns had anything to do with the senior team's use of the field as they are requesting only five uses of the field out of hundreds that are already scheduled. /3% City Council Minutes -15- June 5, 1990 Peterson commented the Council would not be involved in this discussion if in 1986 a temporary trial period to see what impact this would have on the neighborhood had not been established. He wished to focus discussion on that issue and determine whether the Council was inclined to change the restriction, to instruct Pauly to address the liability issue, and to proceed with the recommendation to meet with the School District representatives to develop a satisfactory design solution for the baseball field. If there was a substantial liability risk, action should be taken. MOTION: Pidcock moved, Harris seconded to authorize staff to meet with schoal district representatives to develop a satisfactory design solution for the baseball and soccer fields and to remove the restrictions regarding use of the fields. Pauly pointed out that the motion in 1986 referred to City-sponsored use and questioned if this program comes within the perview of this policy. Anderson asked who was responsbile for the maintenance of the fields. Lambert replied the City had an agreement with the School District that any additional maintenance to accommodate the City programs would be done by the City. The perimeter of the property was still the School District's responsibility. Pauly did not believe the City had any liability or responsibility for design defects of the field. Peterson stated apart from the legal liability, the Council had a moral responsibility; scheduling and use was beyond the scope of the motion. Tenpas asked for clarification of the second portion of the motion. Peterson explained it was simply to remove the restriction imposed by the Council in 1986. Tenpas asked Mr. Jullie to follow-up with the issue of residents retaining balls to make sure there were no further conflicts over that issue. Motion carried on a unanimous vote. City Council Minutes -16- June 5, 1990 VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY COMMISSIONS A. Report of Landfill Advisory Committee Tenpas reported that Dawson had done an excellent job for this committee. The committee had a lot of input from a lot of people over a series of meetings. From what the City Attorney had indicated, the Council had a critical point coming up at the MPCA meeting on June 26 in relation to the FAA and airport issue. The Committee was requestiong that the Council focus some dollars specifically toward that. The consultants had expressed frustration as the City staff's time is committed to other projects and they felt a point person is necessary for this group. One of the consultants could fulfill that role. Assistant City Attorney Ric Rosow explained the judge's recommendation to deny the Council's motion to dismiss the case Included a recommendation that the matter be certified to the agency board. The board was taking a denovo review of this matter and the City would have an opportunity to address the board. The idea of advertising came up at one of the landfill committee's meetings in an effort to develop public interest and to impress upon the public at large the City of Eden Prairie's concerns and position in this matter. The question was asked if the advertising would be helpful and appropriate, to which he responded he believed this is an extremely crucial time in this case. This issue was extremely important, and could determine the entire case. Even though the judge had denied the motion, the City Attorney's office believed there was still an opportunity to convince the board otherwise. Public sentiment can have a great impact and the City should not hesitate to participate in public expression. Tenpas commented full page as running across the entire state were being considered. Pidcock explained one of the critical issues was that the MPCA Board members lived all over the state, and it was imperative that they read the message in the news media and understand it before they come down to the meeting. Peterson asked if the advertising being planned was illegal because the Council would be communicating directly with the Board. Tenpas responded the public awareness and political pressure was critical and the advmising would help change the perception that this was an Eden Prairie versus BFI issue. The target for the advertising was the public at large as well as the Commissioners. Pidcock added it is also important to reach the Metropolitan Airport Commission as well as the FAA. City Council Minutes -17- June 5, 1990 Harris asked what the context of the ads would be and who would be putting the ads together and reviewing the language, etc., as the tone of the ads is very important. Tenpas suggested that several ads be prepared and then brought back to the Council for review. Harris referred to the $65,000 budget submitted for the period of time through August. She stated it appeared there was a plan evolving and that the Council should be looking at a prospective budget for the year. Pidcock stated the video should be ready for the public hearing on June •5th. Peterson commented that $575,000 had been budgeted for the year • and so far $324,000 has been spent. The Council should be looking ahead to determine if additional funds would need to be added to avoid running out of money before the end of the year. Anderson also expressed concern about sufficient dollars being budgeted. Rosow explained he had reserved time through the end of August for the trial, but it could run beyond that; a decision from the Board could possibly be given in December. Tenpas suggested that staff be instructed to prepare a proposed budget in conjunction with the city attorney and combine that with the committee's proposed budget. Anderson agreed. Jullie reported Rosow, working with the various consultants, had put together a projection through May for $381,000 with an estimated $360,000 to get through the contested case, court of appeals, and BFI variance case before the MPCA. This totaled $741,000 and the additional $65,000 presented this evening would put the Council about $230,000 over budget at the end of the year. Peterson stated the Council was talking about $740,000 for a project that he voted against in December. He stated he would abstain from voting that for efforts that have to do with expenditure of money on this matter in the future. MOTION: Tenpas moved, Pidcock seconded, that the Council vote to approve the committe's recommendation for a budget of $65,000 through August; that the commmittee come back to the Council with an estimated budget through the end of the year; that the Council have the opportunity to review the advertising prior to publication: and to enter into agreements with the November Group, Mona Meyer & McGrath, and Messerli & Kramer. Motion carried on a 4-0-1 vote with Peterson abstaining. City Council Minutes -18- June 5, 1990 X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARD AND COMMISSIONS A. Reports of Council Members 1. Status of Pedestrian Crossing at Hwy. 169/Anderson Lakes Parkway. Harris questioned the status of the Anderson Lakes Parkway/Hwy. 169 pedestrian crossing. Dietz responded a letter was received from MnDOT District Engineer Bill Crawford stating MnDOT would like to implement the current plan for pedestrian-activated signals and painted crosswalks and see how that worked before proceeding further. Harris asked when these will be installed. Dietz responded he believed it would be installed prior to the next school season. Harris if there is a similar option for the Tanager Lane area. Dietz responded he believed there were some things residents could do themselves to correct the problems they were experiencing. 2. Liability Coverage Harris stated at an earlier meeting the issue of excess liability coverage was discussed. She requested this be placed on an upcoming agenda. 3. Review of Law Enforcement Trends Harris requested Chief Wall to attend a future Council meeting to discuss with him trends in crime as the City develops, where he sees the police department going, and whether more resources should be considered. 4. Firearms Discharge Ordinance In an effort to be proactive, Harris requested the Council consider its position on firearms discharge areas prior to the next hunting season. 5. Southwest Corridor Coalition Pidcock reported the Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition received the $10,000 from Hennepin County. Peterson informed the Council he will be absent from the June 19th meeting. City Council Minutes -19- June 5, 1990 E. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources 1. Miller Park - In response to a request from residents of the Weston Bay area, staff had studied redesign possibilities to Miller Park to incorporate the needs of the park and the desires of the residents. An amended plan which appears to be better than the approved plan had been developed. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered this matter at its May 7 and May 21, and June 4, 1990, meetings. Anderson asked if there will be a trail access at the end of Weston Boulevard. Lambert responded there could be a trail in that location. MOTION: Harris moved, Pidcock seconded, to accept the Commission's recommendation. Motion carried on a unanimous vote. G. Report of Director of Public Works 1. T.H. 212 EIS Dietz reported the public hearing on this was tomorrow evening which he would attend. He would like to report that the City still had a preferred alignment, that it still had some concerns about noise, and that an additional noise analysis study needed to be made on the preferred alignment. Based on what happened at this meeting, he would prepare a resolution for the Council's review and submission for the EIS documents. The Council authorized Dietz to proceed. 2. Award Contract for Sweeper Dietz reported only one bid was received from MacQueen Equipment in the amount of $61,986, which he recommended be awarded. MOTION: Harris moved, Pidcock seconded to award the contract to MacQueen Equipment, motion carried unanimously. 3. Award Contract for Skid-steer Loader Dietz reported three bids were received with the low bid being by Lano Equipment in the amount of $33,995.52. City Council Minutes -20- June 5, 1990 MOTION: Pidcock moved, Anderson seconded to award the contract to Lano Equipment, motion carried unanimously. Tenpas expressed concern about the practice of always awarding contracts to the lowest bidder, as that may not always be the best choice long term. XII. ADJOURNMENT Anderson moved, Pidcock seconded to adjourn at 11:03 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. /3741, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST June 19, 1990 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Bremer Construction, Inc. Builders Alliance Contract Services & Supply, Inc. Dri-Steem Humidifier Co. Hartmann Chiropractic, P. A. Heitzman Construction, Inc. Morcon Construction, Inc. CONTRACTOR (1 & 2 FAMILY) W. Bach & Son, Inc. Hans Hagen Homes Petruska Construction, Inc. Porch Living W. J. Construction, Inc. Wuensch & Remer Construction, Inc. PLUMBING Forcier Plumbing Twin City Plumbing Gregg Werner Plumbing GAS FITTER Dependable Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc Eiden Bros. HEATING & VENTILATING Dependable Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc - CIGARETTE U-Serve-It, Inc. Temporary Beer Eden Prairie Lions Club (July 4th & August 11, 1990) These licenses have been approved by the department he a d s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r the licensed activity. Pat Solie Licensing 13'13 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ENGINEERING REPORT ON FINAL PLAT Mayor Peterson and City Council Members THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician , DATE: June 14, 1990 SUBJECT: BENTEC ADDITION PROPOSAL: The owners, Bentec Engineering Corporation, have requested City Council approval of the final plat of Bentec Addition, located at the northeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 169 and County Road 1 west of Yorkshire Lane. Formerly Lots 11 and 12, Block 3 Yorkshire Point, the plat contains 1.85 acres to be combined into one lot for office use. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council in 1981 and this proposal is consistent with that preliminary plat approval. The first reading of Ordinance 24-90, Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District, is scheduled for the City Council meeting June 19, 1990. Second reading of said ordinance is tentatively scheduled for final reading at the City Council held July 17, 1990. The Developer's agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution July 17, 1990. VARIANCES: A variance must be granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and roadways are in place and available to serve this site. Prior to release of the final plat, the owner must complete vacation procedures for vacation of underlying drainage and utility easements over Lots 11 and 12. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding must conform to City Code and the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Bentec Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of Engineering Fee in the amount of $250.00 2. Completion of Vacation of drainage and utility easements over underlying Lots 11 and 12. JJ:ssa cc: Bentec Engineering Ron Krueger & Associates egg CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-160 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BENTEC ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Bentec Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Santee Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated June 14, 1990. B. Variance is herein granted from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat as described in said engineer's report. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. D. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 19, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 146 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-169 SUPPLEMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT T.H. 212 EIS/DESIGN STUDY REPORT SUPPLEMENT 13 WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, the Metropolitan Council, Carver County, Hennepin County, the City of Chanhassen, the City of Eden Prairie, and the City of Chaska, hereinafter referred to as the "Agencies" did enter into an agreement identified as Number 64140 for the performance of an environmental impact statement and a design study report for the T.H. 212 corridor; WHEREAS, the Agencies did thereby agree to participate and cooperate in the preparation and completion of the T.H. 212 Environmental Impact Statement and Design Study Report; WHEREAS, it was determined that a consulting firm would be selected by the Agencies' Task Force and hired by Carver County, to prepare the Environmental Impact Statement and Design Study Report; WHEREAS, a contract was executed with a consulting firm and a substantial portion of the required scope of work has been completed; WHEREAS, additional requirements of various governmental agencies have required additional study and staff time by the consultant and the consultant has asked for additional compensation; WHEREAS, it was agreed in Section 2.01 of Agreement No. 64140, that all expenses for the study exceeding $320,000 would be the responsibility of the Minnesota Department of Transportation; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposed costs to perform the additional services and have found the costs to be fair and reasonable; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is obligated to reimburse Carver County for necessary payments to the consultant for the additional work requested; and WHEREAS, Supplement Number Three to Agreement No. 64140 for amending the maximum contract amount to $582,000 and the Minnesota Department of Transportation's portion of this amount to $382,000 has been written, is attached hereto, and is made a part hereof. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 90-169 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Eden Prairie that Supplement Number Three, a part hereof, is approved, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager be and hereby are authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 19, 1990. ATTEST: SEAL John D. Franc, Clerk CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT TO SECTION AGREEMENT 64140 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES Supplement No. 3 to Agreement No. 64140 The State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, and The County of Carver Re: T.H. 212 Environmental Impact Statement SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING AGREEMENT NO. 3 THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) , the Metropolitan Council, Carver County, Hennepin County, the City of Chanhassen, the City of Eden Prairie, and the City of Chaska hereinafter referred to as the "Agencies". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Agencies did enter into Agreement No. 64140 and Supplement No. 1 and No. 2, whereby the Agencies did agree to participate and cooperate in the preparation and completion of the T.H. 212 Environmental Impact Statement and Design Study Report; and WHEREAS, it was determined that a consultanting firm would be selected by the Agencies' Task Force and hired by Carver County, page 2 64140-3 to prepare the Environmental Impact Statement and Design Study Report; and WHEREAS, a contract was executed with a consultanting firm and a sub- stantial portion of the required scope of work has been completed; and WHEREAS, additional writing and revisions have been necessary on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement due to extensive comments made by Mh/DOT beyond the originally anticipated level; and WHEREAS, following review of the preliminary Draft HIS it has been determined by Mn/DOT that additional data collection and analysis will be necessary, primarily related to noise impacts, beyond the level originally anticipated; and WHEREAS, the analysis and documentation, for this project in general, has been much more extensive than originally expected; and WHEREAS, the consultant has been requested to conduct the necessary data collection, analysis and research, and provide the required documentation for the potentially impacted sites along the corridor; and WHEREAS, it was agreed in Section 2.01 of Agreement No. 64140, that all expenses for the study exceeding $320,000 would be the responsibility of Mn/DOT; and page 3 64140-3 WHEREAS, Mn/DOT has previously agreed to reimburse Carver County for all expenses incurred for Supplement No. 1 and No. 2 to Agreement No. 64140, to a maximum amount of $175,000.00; and WHEREAS, the Mn/DOT has reviewed the proposed costs to perform the additional services and have found the costs to be fair and reasonable; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is obligated to reimburse Carver 'County for necessary payments to the consultant for the additional work requested. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED As FOLLOWS: REVISION SECTION 2.0 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Sections 2.01 and 2.02 should be revised to the following: 2.01 The consultant contract shall not exceed $520,030 and shall be approved by a majority vote of the T.H. 212 Task Force prior to execution by Carver County and the consultant. If it appears at any time that the payments to the consultant will exceed a total estimated payment of $520,030 for the project, the consultant shall not perform any services that would cause that amount to be exceeded unless the consultant has been advised by Carver County that the additional funds have been encumbered by Mn/DOT. However, the total amount to be paid to the consultant shall not exceed the sum of $582,000 without an additional supplemental agreement being executed between the Agencies. The costs to the municipalities, the counties, and the Metropolitan Council shall not exceed $200,000.00 and shall be shared as follows: 12.CV1 page 4 64140-3 AGENCY COST City of Chanhassen $ 30,000 City of Chaska $ 30,000 City of Eden Prairie $ 30,000 Carver County $ 30,000 Hennepin County $ 30,000 Metropolitan Council $ 50,000 Mn/DOT $ 320,030 (382,000 max) $ 520,030 (582,000 max) Should the final cost of the study exceed $582,000, the Minnesota Department of Transportation agrees to complete the Environmental Impact Statement and Design Study Report at no additional cost to the agency members listed below: City of Chanhassen Carver County City of Chaska Hennepin County City of Eden Prairie Metropolitan Council A final contract cost of less than $582,000 shall result in reduced agency costs proportional to each agency's cost obligations stated as follows: For Costs up $320,000: MAXIMUM $ PERCENTAGE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION Chanhassen $ 30,000 9.375 % Chaska $ 30,000 9.375 % Eden Prairie $ 30,000 9.375 % Carver County $ 30,000 9.375 % Hennepin County $ 30,000 9.375 % Metropolitan Council $ 50,000 15.625 % Mn/DOT $ 120,000 37.500 % Subtotal: $ 320,000 100.000 % For Costs exceeding $320,000, up a maximum of $582,000: Mn/DOT $ 262,000 100.000 % TOTAL: $ 582,000 (Maximum without additional supplemental agreement) (2+2 page 5 64140-3 2.02 Each agency's pro rata share, as defined in Section 2.01, shall be paid to Carver County as contracting agent, from time to time when and as payments are required to be made by Carver County to the consultant firm pursuant to the contract. Carver County shall invoice each Agency from time to time as payments are required to be made to the consultant firm. Such invoices shall reflect each member Agency's share of the payment due and shall be paid within 35 days from receipt of the invoice. STATUS OF ORIGINAL AGREEMENT Except as amended and modified herein, the term of said Agreement No. 64140 and Supplement No. 1 and No. 2 shall remain in full force and effect. APPROVALS Before this Supplemental Agreement shall become binding and effective, it shall receive the approval of such State Officers as the law may provide, in addition to the Commissioner of Transportation. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-163 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer H.T.P.O. has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-197 (Bluffs East 7th, Utility & Street Improvements) and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: ' 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 A.M., July 12, 1990, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, July 17, 1990, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 19, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEP/N COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-164 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-188 (Community Center Trunk Watermain Improvements) and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: ' 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 A.M., July 12, 1990, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabWated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, July 17, 1990, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on June 19, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk TO: Mayor and City Council Members THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Carl J. Jullie City Manager Natalie Swaggert Human Resources & Services June 14, 1990 Workers' Compensation Coverage After a careful review of our employee insurance coverage, including our pending renewal for Workers Compensation insurance, I would like to recommend that a change in coverage be made to help control our costs and reduce our risk exposure. In 1989, the City Council adopted a resolution to extend Workers' Compensation coverage to elected and appointed officials. Inclusion of Council members is a widely accepted practice and easily accomplished. At that time however, the resolution was expanded to extend coverage to other members of Boards and Commissions and volunteers. Though providing coverage to individuals acting on behalf of the City may seem reasonable, volunteer workers are not routinely covered for Workers' Compensation by the League of Minnesota Cities program or any conventional insurance carrier, since Minnesota statutes do not require such coverage. By electing to cover these individuals, we have assumed the financial liability for their medical bills, lost wages during the temporary disability period, lost wages and earning power resulting from any permanency, retraining and rehabilitation benefits. Furthermore, though we have the full financial responsibility, we have no control or influence over their return to work because we are not their regular employer. It is also important to note that in 1989 a decision was made to provide members of Boards and Commissions with personal accident insurance that provides accidental death and dismemberment and short term disability benefits. This coverage was renewed in March of this year and currently covers members of the City Council and 70 Board members. A summary of the coverage is attached. The issue of providing some type of coverage for volunteers, who are injured while performing services for the City, has received considerable attention over the past year. Currently, The League of Minnesota Cities is working on a program to address this need. By January 1991, they should have a plan for us to consider. At this time it is recommended that the Council adopt Resolution No. 90 - 168 which redefines the individuals to be covered by Workers' Compensation benefits and rescinds Resolution 89 - 60. m-res168 pb 30<" Dear Member City, The League of Minnesota Cities is pleased to offer through T. C. Field and Company and Life Insurance Company of North America, an Accidental Death & Dismemberment and Short Term Disability benefit for your city council members, and selected Committee, Commission or Board members. This insurance covers all eligible council members while they are traveling to, participating in. or traveling from a regular or special meeting of the council or other city board, commission. or committee of which the individual is a member, or while conducting official council business on behalf, and at the request of the council. Coverage begins at the start of a trip, whether from their home, office or other location, and ends upon their return to their home or office, or makes a personal deviation. "Personal deviation", as used here. means an activity that is not necessarily related to their business, and not incidental to the business trip. ELIGIBILITY All active Minnesota Municipal Council members whose municipality has elected to participate in this program and all members of City or Municipal Committiees, Commissions and Boards for whom the Municipality has applied for coverage. THE BENEFIT Accidental Death & Dismemberment If bodily injuries result in death or dismemberment within one year of a covered accident, the plan will pay as follows: Loss of Life $100.000* Loss of two or more members $100.000" Loss of one member $50.000' Loss of thumb and index finger of the same hand $25,000` "Member" means hand, foot or eye. Only one amount, the largest to which you are entitled, will be paid for all losses resulting from one accident. if you are age 70 or over at the time you sustain injuries in a covered accident, your Principal Sum reduces to 65% of the original amount; at age 75, to 45%; at age 80, to 30%: and at age 85, to 15%. Total Disability Weekly Benefit If. within 30 days of the date of a covered accident, an insured becomes totally disabled as a direct result of injuries sustained, and from no other cause, the Plan will pay $400.00 per week, following a 3-day waiting period, for up to 26 weeks, or until such time as a benefit becomes payable for loss of life, limb or sight. Exposure and Disappearance If the body of an Insured has not been found within one year of the disappearance, stranding. sinking or wrecking of any vehicle in which the Insured was an occupant, then it shall be presumed, subject to all other provisions and conditions of the policy that the Insured has suffered loss of life covered under the policy. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90-168 • A RESOLUTION CLARIFYING WHICH PERSONS ARE ENTITLED TO WORKERS COMPENSATION AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 89-60 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-60 on March 21, 1989; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to clarify the extent to which persons acting on the City's behalf are entitled to workers compensation coverage; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that all officers of the City elected or appointed shall be included in the definition of "employee" as defined in Minnesota Statutes relating to coverage for purposes of workers compensation entitlement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that members of City Boards or Commissions and volunteers acting on behalf of the City are specifically excluded from such coverage; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 89- 60. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 19th day of June, 1990. Mayor Gary D. Peterson SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 90 - 170 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PERSONNEL POLICY FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota that this Personnel Policy be adopted as the official City Personnel Policy. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19 day of June, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-165 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HOLTZE EXECUTIVE RESIDENCE FOR HOLTZE BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Holtze Executive Residence for Holtze Brothers Development Company, dated June 8, 1990, consisting of 7.2 acres into one lot and one outlot for construction of a 220 unit hotel development, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved:. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of June, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk RES90165 I N 9 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 15, 1990 SUBJECT: Holtze Executive Residence Inn The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the Holtze Executive Residence on May 29, 1990, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report which included a number of plan revisions to be completed prior to review by the City Council. 1. Revise the exterior ele ations to meet the City Code for exterior materials, The Planning Commission did not feel that the proponents provided substantiation for the PUD waiver to allow more than 25% wood siding on the buildings. The Commission recommended that the exterior building elevations be revised to meet City Code for 75% facebrick and glass. The proponent will be requesting that the City Council consider the waiver. 2. provide architectural elevations for the storage building which are compatible in terms of roof lines and exterior materials with other buildings on the site. The proponent has submitted exterior building elevations which depict compatibility of building materials and architecture with the main buildings on site. The exterior material is all wood which will require a waiver through the PUD. 3. Revise the landscaping plan, to Provide a berm along Valley View Road which screens parking areas. Add conifers and mass shrub plantings along Office Ridge Circle to screen narking. The grading plan has been revised to provide a berm along Valley View Road to screen views of the parking area. Some additional shrub plantings have been added along Office Ridge Circle, however, it will not be adequate enough to screen parking. The Staff Report recommends additional conifers and a triple row depth of shrub plantings in order to effectively screen parking. 4. Submit samples of exterior materials and colors for review. The proponent has provided an exterior materials board which will be available for Council review at the meeting. A white brick, white wood siding, and black shingles are proposed for Memo Holtze Executive Residence June 15, 1990 Page 2 the exterior materials. These colors are not compatible with other buildings within the PUD to the east. The use of white colors on the building would also not be consistent with the site plan ordinance which requires compatibility of colors and exterior materials with adjacent uses. Lighter colors are found extensively in warmer climates because they are cool. Since the proponent has first developed these in the Denver area perhaps this is why they have made white a first color choice. Darker colors in northern climates convey a warmer feeling especially during the winter months. 5. provide lightina details. The proponent has supplied lighting details which depict a 20 foot high downcast cutoff luminar. This would be consistent with parking lot lighting on adjoining properties. 6. Provide sian detail for the nylon sian and wall sian. The proponent has submitted a plan for the pylon sign and the wall sign in compliance with City Code requirements. 7. Revise the site plan to show a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along Office Ridae Circle. Staff's initial recommendation for a 5 foot wide sidewalk along Office Ridge Circle was based on possibility of extending an internal connection through the PUD to Market Place Drive. (No sidewalk connection was shown between the cul-de-sacs on the 1980 PUD.) The Parks Commission reviewed the requirement for the 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk and felt that since an internal private sidewalk was provided within the project to the trail on Valley View Road that the additional sidewalk would not be necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff would recommend that the development plans be revised to meet the City Code requirements for exterior materials, revise the exterior material to reflect warmer colors compatible with adjoining land use within the PUD, and revise the landscaping plan for better screening from Office Ridge Circle. EXECVLMO.MDF:bs HUI PROPOSED SITE tpf C: 5 , I tn5 I‘ OCIATION MAP top STAFF REPORT The Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning May 25, 1990 Holtze Executive Residence Southwest corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle Holtze Brothers Development Eden Prairie Land Development Company and Condon-Naegle Realty Company 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 31 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.6 acres. PROM: THRU: RAM SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: SEOUEST: 3. Zoning District Change from Office and C- Regional to C-Regional- Service on 5.6 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 7.2 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot for the construction of a 220 unit hotel development. BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as Regional-Commercial. Surrounding land uses to the north, east and south are guided Regional Commercial. The land area to the west is guided Regional-Commercial. This site is part of the 31 acre Lake Ridge Office Park which was approved in 1980. Molts. Executive Residence May 25, 1990 The PUD has been amended over the years to include a mixture of Office, and Industrial uses. This 5.6 acre parcel was envisioned as an office use in the original PUD. This site was zoned Office in 1985 for a three story 50,00 square foot office building. A hotel use on this site would be an appropriate land use since it is part of the Major Center Area. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS In order for this site to develop as proposed, waivers are requested through the Planned Unit Development District Review process. Waivers are requested for Floor Area Ratio, building height, exterior materials, and parking setback. 1. Floor Area Ratio The site plan is proposed at a .47 Floor Area Ratio. The C- Regional-Service Zoning District will allow up to a .40 Floor Area Ratio. Hampton Inn (.47 Floor Area Ratio), Brock Resident Inn (.44 Floor Area Ratio), and Marriott Courtyard (.45 Floor Area Ratio), received waivers through the Planned Unit Development District Review process. These waivers were granted predicated upon trade-offs including lower Base Area Ratios which allowed more open space between the buildings, and additional landscaping which helped reduce the visual impacts of increased building mass above code. 2. guildina Height A building height waiver is requested to 46 feet. The maximum height in the C-Regional-Service Zoning District is 40 feet. Hampton Inn (45 feet), Brock Resident Inn (44 feet), and the Marriott Courtyard (46 feet), received waivers through the Planned Unit Development District Review process. Reasons for granting a PUD waiver for increased building height could be building setbacks in excess of the code from the property line, grade changes which reduce the visual height from Valley View Road, and the top 6 feet of each building is a pitched roof which is a small amount of building mass. 3. gxterior Materials The City Code requires in the Commercial and Office Zoning Districts a minimum of 75% facebrick and glass. A waiver is requested to allow 50% wood. Half of the buildings are proposed as all brick, and half of the buildings are proposed as all wood siding. Waivers were requested for all stucco on the Marriott Courtyard, all stucco on Hampton Inn, and all wood on the Brock Residence Inn. The City did not grant PUD 2 Holtze Executive Residence Kay 25, 1990 waivers for these hotels. 4. Zero Lot Line Setback A zero lot line setback waiver from 10 feet to 0 feet is requested along the west property line. The site plan could be revised to meet the 10 foot setback requirement, however, the site plan with the waiver would result in more efficient parking and provides more open space between the buildings. SITE PLAN The site plan depicts the construction of 10 buildings totalling 220 rooms, plus a club house. The site is being developed at a Base Area Ratio of .16. The Code will allow up to a .20 Base Area Ratio. Parking required would be based on 1 car per guest room, plus 1 per employee, for a total of 228 spaces. A total of 228 spaces are shown on the site plan. Access to this site is from Office Ridge Circle and Valley View Road. A left turn lane from west bound Valley View Road must be constructed subject to Hennepin County Department of Transportation approval. The driveway entrance off Valley View Road is slightly offset between the median opening on Valley View Road. The proponent must work with Hennepin County Department of Transportation to review the geometric alignment of the driveway entrance. The 1980 PUD depicted a cross access in the southeast corner of the property. The site plan depicts a location for a future access road. (A cross access agreement and easement will also be necessary to the west of the site for access to a future parking area.) ARCHITECTURE The PUD waiver section indicated that the proponents are requesting a height waiver from 40 to 46 feet, and exterior materials waiver to permit 50% wood siding on the buildings. The Code would permit up to 25% wood. While there appears to be justification for the increase in height based upon grade changes and consistency with past approvals, there is no justification for the exterior materials waiver. The exterior elevations of the buildings should be revised to meet Code. 3 Holtse Executive Residence May 25, 1990 Although wood can occupy up to 25% of the building's exterior, a metal or vinyl siding would be recommended for maintenance reasons. A garage is proposed in the southeast corner of the property. No building elevations have been submitted for this structure. Exterior elevations, materials and roof lines should be consistent with the main buildings on the property. • LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required for this project would be based upon the caliper inch requirement according to building square footage, screening of parking areas from public roads, and to mitigate the impacts of the increase in Floor Area Ratio and building height. Parking is visible from Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle. It is possible to construct a berm at the top of the slope along Valley View Road which will block site lines into the parking area. It is not possible to screen parking with berming from Office Ridge Circle since the setback to parking is 17.5 feet. In this area, additional conifers and shrub plantings in triple rows can be added which would screen parking. The total caliper inches provided on-site is comparable to the amount provided on other hotels. The Marriott Courtyard, Brock Residence Inn, and Hampton Inn hotels provided, on average, 5.37 inches of trees for every 1,000 square feet of building. The Holtze Executive Residence provides 5.27 inches of trees for every 1,000 square feet of building. GRADING This site slopes steeply from a high point adjacent to Valley View Road to a low point in the southwest corner of the site. Up to 15 feet of fill will be necessary in order to accommodate the grading plan as proposed. Grading is proposed within the Interstate 494 right-of-way and will require MNDOT approval. UTILITIES S STORM DRAINAGE Sewer and water services are available to this site by connection to utilities which exist in Office Ridge Circle. Sewer and water lines are stubbed to the adjoining undeveloped properties. The water main is looped within the property (and all buildings will be sprinkled) for fire protection. Storm water runoff will drain through a series of storm sewer pipes and catch basins into a ponding area which is off-site. 4 Holtz. Executive Residence May 25, 1990 LIGHTING Exterior lighting is proposed within the parking lot. Lighting should be at a maximum height of 30 feet and downcast cutoff luminars. inn A pylon sign is proposed on Valley View Road and a building wall sign along Interstate 494 frontage. No sign details have been provided. §IDEWALES 6 TRAILS There is an existing 8 foot wide bituminous trail along the south side of Valley View Road. A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk connection is Proposed from the buildings to this trail. A sidewalk should also be installed along Office Ridge Circle with connections to buildings on-site. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for PUD Concept Amendment on 31 acres, PUD District Review on 5.6 acres, Zoning District Change from C-Regional and Office to Commercial- Regional-Service on 5.6 acres, Site Plan Review on 5.6 acres, and a Preliminary Plat of 7.5 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot based on plans dated May 9, 1990, subject to the recommendations of this Staff Report dated May 25, 1990, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall: a. Revise the exterior building elevations to meet the City Code for on exterior materials. Provide architectural elevations for the storage building. Architecture for the storage building shall be compatible in terms of roof lines and exterior materials with other buildings on-site. b. Revise the landscaping plan to provide a berm along Valley View Road which screens parking areas. Add conifers and mass shrub plantings along Office Ridge Circle to screen parking. c. Provide samples of exterior materials and colors for review. 5 !dq (m Boltz. Executive Residence May 25, 1990 d. Provide lighting details. e. Provide sign details for the pylon sign and wall sign. Both signs should meet City Code requirements. f. Revise the site plan to show a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along Office Ridge Circle. 2. Prior to final Plat approval, the proponent shall: a. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, storm drainage and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. b. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: a. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. b. Provide samples of exterior materials for review. c. Provide lighting details for review. d. Provide sign details for review. 4. Notify the City and the Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 5. Receive approval from the Hennepin County Highway Department for construction of a left turn lane and driveway access onto Valley View Road. 6. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, receive approval from the State Highway Department for grading work in 1-494 right-of- way, and approval from the Watershed District. 7. PUD waivers are granted for building height to 46 feet, Floor Area Ratio to .47 and a 0 setback to parking along the west property line. HOLTZE.MDF:mmr 6 i LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT I.AW 7900 AVENUE SOUTH •LOOHINOTON. MINNESOTA 55411 CCCCC HONE 16121•311,3600 TCIACCIPICR 16121 635-6102 . CHECK May 8, 1990 City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Holtze Executive Village Dear Sirs: 2000 PIPER JAINTITAT TOY/CR 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNICAMOLIS. /4110/C5OTA 55402 TELEPHONE 16121336-6600 TtLECOITIER 16111 330.1002 REPLY TO 61.00MIMOTON 5 I VMM 'PlANNING DEPT MP 0 9 1990 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1500 NORTHw IMIANC/.41. C(NTER This letter is to introduce the Holtze Executive Village project, and will constitute the written narrative accompanying the Land Development Application for Holtze Executive Village. The proposal is to develop a 5.6-acre site at the southwest corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle (the Property) into an 11- building, 220-unit residential hotel (the Hotel). The Property is currently vacant, is zoned Office and Regional Commercial, and is located adjacent to the Bryant Lake Center Planned Unit Development. The proposal is to rezone the Property to Regional Commercial Service for the Hotel use, replat the Property into a single lot with one outlot, and to amend the Bryant Lake Center PUD to include the Property. This will provide the applicant with maximum flexibility in the design of the site and will provide the City with maximum control in its review of the Hotel proposal. The Property is designated for regional commercial uses in the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Hotel is consistent with this designation. Surrounding uses are predominantly office, including Bryant Lake Center and Bryant Lake Office Tech Center to the east, and Super Valu to the north, across Valley View Road. The Hotel will be compatible with and complimentary to these uses. Traffic generated by the Hotel will be particularly complimentary to traffic generated from surrounding office uses. The proposed rezoning of the Property to Commercial Regional Service will put the Hotel in the proper zoning district, consistent with the past practice of the City to locate hotels in Regional Commercial Service districts. The Hotel will comply with all of the requirements and performance standards for the regional commercial service RIO LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 6k LINDGREN, LTD. ' 11-- City of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page 2 district, with four minor variances as noted below. It is proposed that these variances be reviewed and acted on as part of the Planned Unit Development Amendment review process, consistent with City ordinances and past practices. The remainder of this letter will respond specifically to the information items requested in Sections E and K of the Appendix to the City's land development procedures. E.1. eneral oescrioraon_o ne_Reoues The proposal is to'build a 220-unit residential hotel on the 5.6-acre Property. The Hotel will consist of ten separate 22 to 24-unit buildings clustered around a 5,400 square foot clubhouse. The eleven buildings which make up the Hotel are in two groupings. Four hotel buildings and the clubhouse surround the entry courtyard in a formal, "hotel" setting. These buildings are designed to serve the needs of the typical, overnight "hotel" guest. They will all have facebrick exteriors and will be connected to the clubhouse by covered, colonnaded walkways. The six remaining hotel buildings surround the entry courtyard ensemble in a more informal, residential setting. These rooms are designed to serve the needs of longer term, "residential" guests. The buildings are positioned so that each will present a slightly different facade to surrounding streets and properties, and to provide maximum ease of pedestrian access for guests and tenants from the hotel buildings to the clubhouse. The ensemble of five buildings surrounding the entry courtyard has been designed to provide an elegant entrance to the hotel from Valley View Road. The entry courtyard, clubhouse and a water feature in the interior of the Hotel site have been aligned with the entrance from Valley View Road to bring guests off of Valley View Road into the center of the Hotel complex. The clubhouse fireplace will be visible through glass doors from the drop-off point in the entry courtyard. Parking is distributed around the perimeter of the hotel buildings. Parking areas are screened from surrounding streets and properties by a combination of berms, grade changes and landscaping. City Code requirements for off-street parking are met on the property. In addition, the applicant will enter into a cross parking easement with the property owner to the west which will result in an additional 43 spaces of parking being available when the property to the west is developed. LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGRE/si, LTD. City of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page 3 Landscaping throughout the property will be far in excess of city requirements. The landscaping is designed to screen parking areas from off-site views, to separate parking areas from the hotel buildings, to visually separate individual buildings, and to enhance the interior amenity area. Most guests will be walking between their hotel building and the clubhouse at least twice a day. For this reason, particular attention has been paid to landscaping interior areas to create a residential environmental along the interior sidewalks. The hotel buildings are positioned so that the minimum separation between any two buildings is 20 feet. However, in virtually all instances, buildings are positioned corner-to-wall, rather than wall- to-wall. This increases actual separation between Hotel units in separate buildings and, together with carefully planned landscaping between the buildings, provides for visual separation of the buildings from off-site locations. The Hotel will be 5 to 7 feet below Valley View Road and the property will slope down an additional 14 to 15 feet, generally from north to south. This sloping topography of the Property will result in a variety of roof line elevations for the individual buildings as viewed from off-site. This feature, coupled with the positioning of the buildings, will increase visual interest of the Hotel by giving the appearance of a variety of building types and heights, and will reduce the visual impact of the project from Valley View Road. The Hotel buildings are designed so that units can be rented as one or two-bedroom suites. One-bedroom suites will range in size from 600 to 650 square feet, while two-bedroom units will be 950 square feet. Amenities in each unit include gas fireplaces, full kitchens, direct- in telephone lines, cable television and others. Units will be rented for periods ranging from over-night hotel stays up to six-month leases. Longer term residents will include relocating families, executives with long-term projects in the southwest metropolitan area, etc. The maximum number of individual units will be 220 if all units are rented as one-bedroom suites. If all units are rented as two-bedroom suites, the maximum number of units would be 119. The actual number of units rented to individual guests or residents on any given night will vary between 119 and 220. Nightly rates will range from $35 to $105, with lower rates for longer stays. The clubhouse will include the Hotel lobby, a large breakfast room, an executive lounge, exercise facilities, Jacuzzi, and swimming pool. LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8k LINDGREN, LTD. It -City of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page 4 The swimming pool is located off the rear of the clubhouse such that it could be enclosed for year-round use if experience indicates there is a demand for year-round use and the costs of enclosing the pool are reasonable. Complimentary continental breakfast and hospitality gathering is provided daily to all guests and residents. The Hotel will employ a total of approximately 30 employees. The Holtze Executive Village at Eden Prairie is patterned after two very successful Holtze Executive Village hotels developed by Holtze Brothers Development Company in Aurora and Engelwood, Colorado. The hallmark of the Colorado hotels, which has been further refined and improved upon in-the Eden Prairie Executive Village, is extensive and carefully designed landscaping throughout the project site with particular attention to landscaping and building positioning in and around the clubhouse and courtyard area. The Holtze Executive Village at Eden Prairie will be unique in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Holtze Executive Village will be an exceptionally high quality, attractive addition to the hotel opportunities available in Eden Prairie. Because of its unique room type and the level of services offered for the price, the Holtze Executive Village will draw guests from far outside Eden Prairie; guests which would not otherwise stay or spend money in Eden Prairie. E.2. Quile-21AnanmeaDsk. The Property is designated for regional commercial uses in the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Holtze Executive Village proposal is consistent with the Guide Plan and the Major Center Area Plan. E.3. Zoning Classification. The present zoning is Office and Regional Commercial. The proposed zoning is Regional Commercial Service. The proposed zoning is consistent with the City's guide plan and the Hotel, in turn, is consistent with the proposed zoning. E.4. Yariancals_BeQuenad. The plan submitted varies from the strict requirements of the Commercial Regional Service District in four respects: 1. Floor area ratio proposed is .47 instead of .40. 2. Maximum height proposed is 46 feet instead of 40 feet. LARKEN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie fay 8, 1990 page 5 3. Setback for parking along the west side of the project is proposed at zero instead of 10 feet. 4. Percentage of brick or better exterior building material proposed is 50% instead of 75%. 1. Although the proposed floor area ratio is .47, the base area ratio for the Hotel is .16 (.20 allowed). The higher floor area ratio is a result of the hotel buildings being three-story structures. The .47 floor area ratio is requested because, with the three-story buildings, no additional land is necessary to locate the 11 buildings and provide sufficient parking: The buildings are positioned around and focus on the clubhouse and courtyard area. Even if additional land were added to the project, the buildings would still be clustered around the clubhouse and courtyard area to provide the desired sense of community and easy access to the clubhouse and courtyard facilities. Most guests will be walking between their building and the clubhouse/courtyard facilities at least twice a day. The buildings have been positioned so as to maximize physical and visual separation between buildings. Increased land area would not increase the :eparation of buildings or change the relationships of the buildings to each other either physically or visually. The Hotel buildings fit very well on the Property. Increased land area would not contribute any to project design and therefore the .47 FAR is requested. The .47 FAR requested is also consistent with what the City has allowed for similar hotel proposals and other buildings in the major Center Area. Planning staff has identified the following five criteria for determining whether an increase in FAR is appropriate: A. Is there an overall benefit to the City? Yes. The Holtze Executive Village will be a great asset to the City. It will provide a needed service on an undeveloped property in the Major Center Area. It will attract both overnight guests and short term residents to the Major Center Area, increasing overall activity levels in the shopping and commercial hub of the City. We believe the proposed FAR variance is to the City's overall benefit because the project cannot be financed or developed without the variance. The prototype for this project, the Holtze Executive Village Hotel in Engelwood, Colorado, was developed at .55 FAR and works very well. We have reduced the FAR for the Eden Prairie project to .47 to be consistent with what the City has allowed for similar hotel proposals and other buildings in the Major Center Area. However, any further reduction in FAR would render the project economically unfeasible and undevelopable. LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8c LINDGREN, LTD. f, Nay of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page 6 B. Is the project better with the variance than without it? Yes. As discussed above, the 11 buildings which constitute the Holtze Executive Village must be clustered as close together as is reasonably possible to provide the desired sense of community and easy access to the clubhouse and courtyard facilities. Because guests will be walking daily between the residential building and the clubhouse/courtyard facilities, it is very important to keep the walking distance between the residential buildings and the clubhouse as short as possible, particularly in light of the Twin Cities area climate. The project is better with the variance because walking distances are kept to a minimum and the sense of community is preserved. C. Will the higher floor area ratio precipitate other variances? No. The requested FAR variance will not precipitate other variances. All setback requirements are met by the project. The three other variances requested are unrelated to the FAR. D. Will the higher floor area ratio create site plan problems? No. In fact, the site plan works much better at the FAR requested because of the need to keep the buildings close together and in close proximity to the clubhouse/courtyard facilities. The site plan provides plenty of room for berming and landscaping as necessary, and includes only two small retaining walls on a site that slopes over 20 feet from one side to the other. E. Is there sufficient landscaping to mitigate impacts of increased FAR? Yes. As discussed below, landscaping for the project far exceeds City Code requirements and more than mitigates any impacts of the increased FAR. 2. The maximum height of the Hotel buildings is 46 feet, six feet above the 40 feet provided for in the zoning code. However, the Property will be from 5 feet to 20 feet below Valley View Road. The buildings will therefore appear from Valley View Road to be substantially shorter than even 40 feet. In addition, the building roofs have a 45 degree pitch, so that the top 6' of roof represents a very small amount of building mass. The Hotel is located far away from any residential areas, in an area of commercial and office uses. Past practice of the City has been to allow higher buildings in similar areas. LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY 8c LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page 7 3. The property immediately to the west of the hotel site will someday be developed for office uses. Because of existing soil conditions on that property, parking for any office building will have to be located along the common property line with the Hotel. Because the parking needs for hotel and office uses peak at different times of the day, it is proposed that there be an area of shared parking for the two uses along the common property line. A cross parking easement agreement will be entered into providing for 43 spaces of shared parking on each side of the property line. To make use of the shared parking spaces more convenient, it is proposed to eliminate the normal setback area along the west property line. The hotel and office parking spaces would then "read" as a single parking facility between the two uses. This solution also makes sense from a traffic flow perspective, as access to Valley View Road from the office development to the west of the Hotel will be by easement through the northwest corner of the Hotel site. This is not an off-street parking variance. All required parking spaces are provided on site. The purpose of the variance is simply to provide extra parking for both uses and to make the extra parking as convenient as possible for users from both facilities. The green space that would otherwise occupy the ten foot setback area on the west side of the property has been distributed throughout the site. There is no increase in FAR as a result of this variance for the shared parking spaces. 4. Guests of the Holtze Executive Village will fall into one of two categories: short term, "hotel" guests who will stay from one to five nights; and longer term, "residential" guests who will be staying from several weeks up to six months or longer. Short term, "hotel" guests are accustomed to the institutional, formal appearance of a brick hotel building. For these guests Holtze Executive Village will offer the four buildings surrounding the entrance courtyard. These four buildings, and the clubhouse, will be covered entirely in facebrick. Access between the four hotel buildings surrounding the entry courtyard and the clubhouse will be by covered, colonnaded walkway. Longer term, "residential" guests will be staying in the six buildings which surround the five building entrance ensemble. The objective is to provide a more informal, residential environment for these guests who will be away from their homes for extended periods of time. The key elements in creating this residential environment include: putting all parking on the outside edges of the project, away from pedestrian areas in the interior of the project; heavily landscaping the interior, pedestrian areas of the project and the areas between buildings; creating residential type sidewalks between each LARKIN, EIGFFKAN, DALY ek LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie lay 8, 1990 - Page building and the clubhouse; and using an exterior building material which conveys the feeling of a single family residential neighborhood. The goal is to create an environment where long term guests feel that they are living in a comfortable, single family residential area from which they walk to the more formal clubhouse area, with its formal, brick buildings, to eat, socialize, exercise, etc. A key element in creating this environment is the appropriate use of building materials. For this reason, the applicant is proposing to use facebrick on the clubhouse and "hotel" guest buildings surrounding the entry courtyard; and siding on the "residential' guest buildings. This will result in 50% "brick or better" siding materials for the overall project. The applicant recognizes that variances from the 75% brick or better requirement are generally not granted by the City. However, because the creation of a residential environment for long term guests is critically important to the success of the Holtze Executive Village, we make this request for a 25% variance. The purpose of the 75% brick or better standard seems to be twofold: (1) because brick and comparable materials are more easily maintained; and (2) because brick is perceived as improving the appearance of large scale commercial projects. With respect to maintenance, Holtze Brothers Development Company and Holtze Corporation develop and manage their hotels for their own account. They do not sell their hotels, but manage them on a permanent basis. Proper operation of the hotel, including proper maintenance of all hotel facilities, is a necessary pre-requisite for the development and management entities to receive a return on their investment as developers and their management fees as operators. Proper maintenance of the hotel facilities will not be an issue. With respect to the appearance of the hotel buildings and the overall project, the applicant would submit that the nature of the project, the heavy landscaping, and the other amenities provided justify a variance from the strict requirement of the 75% brick or better materials. As discussed above, the hotel buildings themselves are not large buildings, but small, 22-24 unit buildings which have been designed specifically to have a single family residential character. It is this single family residential character which the applicant is proposing to preserve by the use of a more typical single family building material, wood siding. Furthermore, landscaping for the Hotel will exceed City requirements, as shown on the landscape plan. For example, City Code requires 364 caliper inches, or approximately 119 trees for this Property. The applicant proposes to plant 184 trees for a total of 576 caliper inches. Together with shrubbery, mulch, sod, soil and LAJRKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page 9 irrigation, the total landscaping budget for the Hotel will substantially exceed the cost of landscaping that City Code would require. The cost differential far exceeds the dollar savings as a result of the 25% variance from the brick or better standard. The variance is not being requested because of a desire to invest less money in the Hotel, but because of the desire to invest money in the Hotel as effectively as possible to create an attractive, residential setting. In addition to the landscaping, which will exceed City requirements, the Hotel will also include a number of amenities which will contribute significantly to its appearance. Project amenities include a water feature in the interior of the Hotel; a covered colonnade surrounding the entry court; patterned concrete paving on the entry court; a swimming pool (which may someday be enclosed), Jacuzzi and exercise room in the clubhouse; and benches, barbecue areas, and other activity areas scattered throughout the Hotel site. Overall, the Hotel will be extremely attractive in appearance both from the outside and the inside. The 25% variance from the brick or better standard will in no way detract from the appearance or maintenance of the project, but will contribute significantly to the creation of a residential character in the areas of the project for longer term, residential guests. The 25% variance is more than off-set by the increased landscaping and other amenities provided throughout the Hotel site. E.5. Existing Land Use. Vacant. E.6.IncLiind_Sanatimatis . The Hotel will be built in a single phase. It is expected that construction will take approximately 9 to 12 months. The applicant would like to start construction in July 1990. E.8 B(Id astrumenmt Restrictions. The proposal is to provide two easements for access from adjoining properties through a portion of the Hotel site to public roads. In the northwest corner of the Property an access easement will be provided for the property to the west, to enable traffic from that property to exit onto valley View Road at the main entrance to the Hotel. This is the only way that the property to the west of the Hotel would have two-way access onto Valley View Road. In the southeast corner of the Property it is proposed to provide an easement for access from the Property to the LARKIN, FIGFPNIAN, DALY ek LINDGREN, LTD. r City of Eden Prairie I., May 8, 1990 page 10 west to Office Ridge Circle. This is consistent with a requirement in the earlier approval of the Bryant Lake Center PUD. In addition, a cross parking easement will be entered into with the owner of the property to the west, as described in Section E.4.3. above. E.9. Enusing_=_Landilinilding t. The Property will consist of 242,013.7 square feet. Building coverage will be approximately 39,900 square feet. Base area coverage is .16. Building floor area is 116,600 square feet. Floor area ratio is .47. Parking provided is 228 spaces, plus 43 spaces which will be available by cross-parking easement when the property to the west is developed. E.10. lignage. Signage will include a pylon sign on Valley View Road and a building sign facing Interstate 494 to the south of the project, plus necessary directional signage, all as allowed by and in compliance with City ordinances. E.11. Lighting. Lighting will be as shown on the Site Plan, all in conformance with City ordinance. E.12. Transportation. City staff has reviewed the transportation impacts of the Hotel and determined that the Hotel will not be inconsistent with the Major Center Area Traffic Study. E.13. Environmental Assessment. Not applicable. E.14. ShargagindinagSlattin• Not applicable. E.15. Airport Zones. Not applicable. E.16. Disposition of Any Excess Land Not applicable. Outlot A will not be purchased by the applicant. LARKIN, ficyFFNIAlsr, apax Ek LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie Aay 8, 1990 page 11 E.17. Water. There are no public or protected waters on the Property. Drainage will be to an existing drainage area in approximately the same volumes as existing drainage from the property. E.18. Wildlife There are no significant wildlife habitats and no trees on the Property. 8.19. 10118. Soil tests have yet to be. completed. 8.20. Imiatiu-atamiatamat. None. 8.21. Steep Slopea. The property has received a significant amount of fill in connection with roadway construction and prior development activities in the area, and currently has some steep slopes which are the result of these prior filling activities. There are no natural steep slopes on the property. Development of the project will require that a substantial amount of additional fill be brought onto the property. It is proposed that the bulk of this material come from Outlot A and from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) right-of-way to the south and east of the property. Eden Prairie Land Company II, owner of Outlot A, has agreed to any necessary grading on Outlot A. Negotiations with MnDOT on the use of fill from and regrading of a portion of its right-of-way are ongoing. When these negotiations are completed a final grading plan for Outlot A and the MnDOT right-of-way areas affected will be submitted. The grading plan for the Property itself is complete and has been submitted with the other plans. The grading plan has been designed to accommodate the significant slope of the property (from north to south) with a minimum of retaining walls. Only two small retaining walls will be required, as shown on the grading plan. Because of the low base area coverage and heavy landscaping of the project, stormwater run-off will be approximately the same following development as under existing conditions. LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie lay 8, 1990 page 12 K.1. Ommaxmlig. Present ownership: Eden Prairie Land Company 11 - approximately 95 percent of land area. Condon-Naegele Realty Company - approximately 5 percent of land area. K.2. Developer. Holtze Brothers Development Company. Holtze Brothers Development Company has developed two other Holtze Executive Village hotels, in Aurora and Engelwood, Colorado. These hotels have been very well received by the communities in which they are located and by the public, and are very successful. Holtze Brothers Development Company will develop the Hotel, which will then be managed by Holtze Corporation. Holtze Corporation and Holtze Brothers Development Company are family owned companies based in Denver, Colorado and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and are engaged in the business of developing and managing residence hotels. A.3. Financing. Financing for the project is not yet finalized. 1C4. Development Method. The Hotel will be developed by Holtze Brothers Development Company in a single phase and managed by Holtze Corporation, which is owned by the same parties that own Holtze Brothers Development Company. K.5. Development Timing. The applicant would like to begin construction in July 1990 and complete the Hotel in a single phase within 9 to 12 months. K.6. Critical_Euhlus,...D.e.c...Laimna- Governmental review and approvals are believed to include only watershed district approval and county approval for a curb cut onto Valley View Road. No public improvements will be necessary to serve the Hotel. K.7. Other Information See above. ( LARKM EIGFFMAN, DALY ek LINDGREN, LTD. City of Eden Prairie May 8, 1990 Page, 11 K.8. EWIJIMUWaniea See Preliminary Plat. K.9. pUD Area. The proposed Amendment of the Bryant Lake Center PUD affects 7.24 acres. K.10. Regional Relationships. The Property is an excellent site for a hotel because of its proximity to Interstate 494 and the Major Center Area of Eden Prairie. The project will not generate any significant impacts on any regional services or systems. K.11. Existing Land Use. Vacant. K.12. TLAIIMICIAtinli. City staff has determined that transportation systems are adequate to accommodate the Hotel and that the Hotel will not generate any adverse impacts on transportation systems. K.13. Existing Zoning. Office and Regional Commercial. Proposed zoning is Regional Commercial Service. K.14. Guide Plan. See above. K.15. Analysis and Conclusions. See above. K.16. photographs. Not applicable. K.17. Ecological Factors There are no significant ecological features or trees on the Property. LARK IN, HOFFMAN, DALy 6k UNDGEUEN, LTD. "-City of Eden Prairie 1.4 Aay 8, 1990 page 14 K.18. Legal rnstrumenta. Access and parking easements final plat. K.19. umixatia. See above. as outlined above will be provided prior to =LIM= Holtze Brothers Development Company respectfully requests that the City commence review of their request for PUD amendment review, zoning district change, preliminary plat, and site plan review. Inquiries or requests for additional information may be directed to the undersigned or to Eric Holtze at 822-1070. Very truly yours, Peter K. Beck, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. kw PKB:FM4S CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 090-167 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VILLAGE KNOLLS FOR ARGUS DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Village Knolls for Argus Development, dated June 14, 1990, consisting of 42.7 acres into 23 single family lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way for a residential development, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved.: ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of June, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk RES90167 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-166 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF VILLAGE KNOLLS FOR ARGUS DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Village Knolls PUD Concept by Argus Development and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, wimias, the City Council did consider the request on June 19, 1990; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Village Knolls, by Argus Development, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans, (as revised), dated June 14, 1990. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated May 14, 1990. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 19th day of June, 1990. Gary D. Peterson, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk RES90166 1 45 Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: June 15, 1990 .SUBJECT: Village Knolls Project 4 The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Villag e K n o l l s P l a n n e d Unit Development on May 29, 1990, subject to the recommendat i o n s i n t h e S t a f f Report which required a number of items to be revised prior t o r e v i e w b y t h e City Council: 1. Revised the concept plan according to Attachment A to reduce gr a d i n g in the creek corridor.. 111",44 4 The concept and grading plan has been revised to shorten the c u l - d e - s a 040 c off Homeward Hills Road and pulls grading limits furthe r a w a y f r o m Purgatory Creek. 2. Modify the site nlan to indicate a 5 foot wide concrete sidewa l k a l o n g one side of the interior loon road within Phase two. The site plan has been revised to depict a 5 foot wide sidewalk a l o n g the west side of the interior loop road in phase two. 3. Modify the site plan to provide for a 40 foot wide outlot with the grading plan denictina an 8 foot wide bituminous trail from H o m e w a r d Mills Road to the bridge across Purgatory Creek at a grade not ex c e e d i n g 10%. The site plan and grading plan has been revised to provide a 4 0 f o o t wide outlot and an 8 foot wide trail at a maximum grade of 8 % b e t w e e n Homeward Hills Road and the bridge across Purgatory Creek. 4. Provide a tree replacement plan for 300 caliper inches pro v i d e reforestation plan for the graded areas adioing _Purgatory C r e e k a s shown on Attachment A. A tree replacement plan for 300 caliper inches and reforest a t i o n p l a n for the slopes adjacent to Purgatory Creek have been provided . 5. Modify the storm drainage Plan to either extend the storm sewer p i p e t o the center line of the creek or redesian the stgrm sewer sys t e m t o redirect all storm drainage to Homeward Hills storm sewer syst m . The storm sewer system plan has been revised to redirec t a l l s t o r m drainage to Homeward Hills Road storm sewer system. vKM0615.MDF:bs MEMO ( 0: OA STAFF REPORT 12: =RR: DAT1: ANDUCI: LOCATION: The Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning May 25, 1990 Village Knolls East of Homeward Hills Road at Silverwood Drive APPLICANT/ rEE OWNER: Joe Miller Homes & Wallace Hustad MOM: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 42.7 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment 11 within the R1-13.5 Zoning LU District on 8.7 acres. T - , 4. Preliminary Plat of 42.7 . acres into 23 single 7 family lots and 2 outlots and road right-of-way for "1 a residential development. "4: single family + 7. •.. BACKGROUND Xj This is a continued item from 1 the May 14, 1990 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission recommended that the development plans be returned to the proponent for the following revisions: 1. Revise the site plan to comply with the Shoreland Ordinance requirements. 2. Revise the site plan to eliminate encroachment ' within the Conservancy Area of Purgatory Creek. • 17,-IAREA LOCATION MAP . I II 41‘0.7 ,-*, \sir •-•//,..., 7 1 rtrd / , . .•., , „• 'Ai. : Jr:- --; ';.- n • .1,, . , ' ', r 1.. , '" ' r .-1 , -",..3. ..,•"...^1,--1f....7.. , '4.7.7 '..s.:,-_-..---'---j..-::ri: WV414, •4,741, • • • 4 n4:4 • • • • • 4 •• • ••• 4. • n••••- .•4 ‘ '••••••f4 •••••4V•-, n *.e.,•••••••/• 4, *V4r vA. 4 r • r W 44 • • °I .frAtt: Village Knolls May 25, 1990 3. Minimize overall tree loss on-site. 4. Minimize the number of waivers requested through the PUD. EM=iMilLiMMIA= The PUD Concept plan has been revised from 69 to 68 lots. Two flag lots are proposed for Lots 16 and 17 instead of a cul-de-sac on the original proposal. A cul-de-sac has been added off Homeward Hills Road plus two lots with driveway access to Homeward Hills Road. These site plan changes allow the project to meet the minimum requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance for lot size, lot width at building setback, lot width at the high water mark, and building setback. FURGATORY CREEK CONSERVANCY AREA The previous Staff Report identified impacts in the Purgatory Creek Conservancy area. 16 of the 69 lots had building pads and grading within the Conservancy Area which resulted in alteration of the character of the Creek Corridor and loss of trees. Sheet 7 indicates the Conservancy and Shoreland Areas along Purgatory Creek. The exhibit depicts a revised Conservancy Line. The City Staff has, on occasion, recommended moving the Conservancy Line after field inspection of the proposed revision to determine what impact revision would have on the character of the creek. When it was determined that the character of the creek valley would be preserved, then the Conservancy Line was changed. The City Staff feels that the Conservancy Line could be amended for the following reasons: 1. Portions of the PUD are part of the existing Bluffs West subdivision which was approved prior to the establishment of the Conservancy Line. The PUD pulls the existing lot lines farther away from the creek, thereby minimizing encroachment on the tree line. 2. Use of flag lots on Lots 16 and 17, Block 2 in Phase 11 instead of the cul-de-sac on the previous plan pulls building pads and grading out of the Conservancy Area and preserves more trees. 3. Use of a cul-de-sac and two lots with direct driveway access to Homeward Hills Road pulls grading and house pads farther away from the Conservancy Area in the northeast corner of the property. The Conservancy Line in this area would be adjusted, however, mitigation would be required on the regraded portion where shown on Attachment A. This will 2 Village Knolls May 25, 1990 screen views from the proposed trail within the Creek Corridor. Attachment A indicates a revised cul-de-sac and lotting plan which would result in saving more trees and less grading adjacent to the Creek Corridor. The reconfiguration of the lots would result in a variance from the Shoreland Ordinance for building width at the setback line. TREE LOOS The previous Staff Report indicated a 39% loss of significant trees within the PUD area. Changes in the grading plan allow more trees to be saved within Phase 1, and the overall tree loss has been reduced to 35%, or 614 inches out of a total of 1847 inches on- site. The majority of the trees being saved are Within the Conservancy Area of Purgatory Creek outside of the lots proposed for the second phase. In addition, since house pads are farther from the Creek there is more of the understory vegetation along the steep slopes adjacent to the Creek is preserved. This provides for better slope stability, erosion control, and preserves more of the Creek character than the previous plan. PUD DISTRICT REVIEW WAIVERS The previous proposal for Phase 1 depicted 16 waivers for lot size and street frontage. The revised plan depicts 8 waivers. Lot size waivers are requested for Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 2, and Lots 9 and 10, Block 1. Street frontage waivers are requested for Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, and for Lot 3, Block 1. The PUD waiver for Lot 3 is the result of keeping the existing house and providing a common driveway for Lots 2 and 3, which intersects opposite Silverwood Road. The waivers for lot size and street frontage would be a trade off for larger lots and greater setbacks between houses and the Creek. STORM DRAINAGE Most of the storm water runoff will drain towards an existing storm sewer system on Homeward Hills Road, however, a portion of the project in Phase 1 will drain towards Purgatory Creek. Since only Phase 1 will be developed at this time, the storm sewer plan proposes a partial pipe and overland drainage swale to Purgatory Creek. On other projects with overland drainage, there has been severe erosion problems, washouts, and loss of vegetation along Purgatory Creek due to concentrated water runoff. It is , 3 Village Nnolls May 25, 1990 recommended that the storm sewer pipe be extended all the way to the channel of Purgatory Creek. Another option would be to redesign the storm sewer plan for Phase 1 to drain into the existing storm sewer system on Homeward Hills Road. VIDESALKS & TRAILS There should be a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk constructed along one side of the loop road within Phase 11. In addition, the plan should be revised to depict the location of an 8 wide bituminous trail from Homeward Hills Road to the existing bridge crossing on Purgatory. Creek. A trail must be provided within a 40 foot wide outlot and grades for the pathway should not exceed 10%. BCCESS Homeward Hills Road is a minor collector road. Intersections should be aligned directly opposite, or no closer than 150 feet offset. The site plan meets this criteria. The cul-de-sac on the north end of the project is opposite the park entrance road to Homeward Hills Park. Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 would have direct driveway access to Homeward Hills Road. Due to the volume of traffic on Homeward Hills Road, it is recommended that these lots share a common driveway with provision for turnaround on each site such that cars would not have to back directly onto Homeward Hills Road. CONCLUSION The PUD as proposed is better than the previous submission with changes in road locations and lotting patterns which result in compliance with the requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance and a reduction in the impacts on the Conservancy Area along Purgatory Creek. The amount of significant tree loss has been reduced to 35% and more of the understory vegetation along the slopes adjacent to the Creek Corridor have been preserved since grading and house pads have been pulled further away from the Creek. Where grading encroaches into the Conservancy Area in the northeast corner of the subdivision, reforestation of the regraded area (which is currently treeless) will mitigate the impacts of encroachment. Revisions to the site plan according to Attachment A can reduce the grading impacts further. The site plan must also be revised to provide a 40 foot wide outlot and the grading plan should depict no more than a 10% grade for the proposed trail connection to the bridge over Purgatory Creek. 4 I 1'1• Village Knolls May 25, 1990 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for P U D Concept on 42.7 acres, PUD District Review with waivers on 8 . 7 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R1-13.5 Zoning Dist r i c t on 8.7 acres and Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 lots an d 2 outlots based on plans dated May 25, 1990, subject to t h e recommendations of Staff Report dated May 11, 1990 and May 2 5 , 1990, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall: a. Revise the Concept plan according to Attachment A to reduce grading in the Creek Corridor. b. Modify the site plan to indicate a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along one side of the interior loop road within Phase 11. c. Modify the site plan to provide for a 40 foot widecmtlot with a grading plan depicting an 8 foot wide bituminous trail from Homeward Hills Road to the bridge across Purgatory Creek at a grade not exceeding 10%. d. Provide a tree replacement plan for 300 caliper inches. Provide a reforestation plan for the graded areas adjoining Purgatory Creek where shown on Attachment A. e. Modify the storm drainage plan to either extend the storm sewer pipe to the center line of the Creek, or redesign the storm sewer system to redirect all storm drainage to Homeward Hills Road storm sewer system. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: a. Provide detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. b. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: a. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. b. Provide plans for review by the Fire Marshall. 5 Village Knolls Nay 25,.1990 4. Grading shall be limited to the area required for Phase 1 only. Stake the proposed grading limits with a construction fence. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 5. Concurrent with Phase 11 construction, construct a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along the interior loop road. 6. If the site plan is revised according to Attachment A, Shoreland Ordinance variances will be required when Phase 11 is subdivided for proposed Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. The Shoreland Ordinance variances for lot width at the building setback results in a better site plan with less grading adjacent to the Creek. - 7. Proposed Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 shall share a common driveway. Each lot shill have a turnaround. • 8. Waivers are granted through the PUD District Review for lot size on Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, and Lots 9 and 10, Block 1; and street frontage for Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, and Lot 3, Block 1. 9. Waivers for flag Lots 16 and 17, Block 2 on Phase 11 will be necessary as part of a PUD District Review when Phase 11 is submitted for zoning and plat approval. VLGEKNOL.MMF:mmr 6 IUL One. There are no trees in this area.. lhe topo g raph y appe, incorrect, duP to f111 that has been brou g ht in over Ei/ARV14LS ROAD ••••• / • r 52; 4 / Attachment A Thm .o down the slope. arel Is steep and contains a few tre A I ""iC Rr.1 nrc.1^, 1i13,1 ,•• AREA LOCATION MAPS Kin STAFF REPORT 12: MN: THROUGH: The Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning May 11, 1990 Village Knolls East of Homeward Hills Road at Silver Wood Drive _Joe Miller Homes and Wallace Hustad 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on At•• 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 8.7 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment with the R1-13.5 Zoning District on 8.7 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 42.7 acres into 23 single family lots and 2 outlots and road right-of- way for a single family residential development. SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ SEE OWNER: ABSUEST: Backaround This site is currently guided Low Density Residential and is zoned R1-13.5. Portions of this site are within the transition and conservancy areas as depicted on the 1975 Purgatory Creek and Open Space Plan. Portions of this site are impacted by the Shoreland Ordinance for lots abutting Purgatory Creek. P.U.D. Concept The P.U.D. Concept on 42.7 acres covers land from Homeward Hills Road to the centerline of Purgatory Creek. The first 1 phase of the development called Village Knolls is 23 lots immediately adjacent to Homeward Hills Road. The second phase is concept only for land development adjacent to the creek corridor. The net density of the PUD is 2.44 units per acre based on 28.3 acres. The gross density which includes the creek corridor is 1.62 units per acre. purcatory Creek Conservancy Area Attachment A indicates the transition and conservancy areas of the 1975 Purgatory Creek Open Space Plan. Twenty-nine of the total 69 lots are within the transition area which is a "build with care" area and 16 of the 69 lots are within the conservancy area which is a "no build zone". The attached memo indicates other projects in the Lower Purgatory Creek area which have lots in the conservancy. However, no grading or building pads have been permitted within the conservancy area unless there was a trade for land area outside of the conservancy that was desirable to preserve. This occurred in the Bluestem Hills 5th Addition and the Creekview project. No trade is proposed as part of the PUD. fhoreland Ordinance Purgatory Creek is classified as a general development water. Provisions of the Shoreland Ordinance that are applicable would be a 13,500 square foot minimum lot size, 120 feet of lot width at the building setback, 120 feet at the Ordinary High Water Mark, and a 100 foot building setback. Eleven of the 14 total lots (where shown on Attachment A) within the shoreland area do not meet the minimum lot width of 120 feet or 120 foot lot width at the Ordinary High Water Mark. Shoreland setback variances are required on proposed Lots 4 and 5 which are setback a minimum of 70 feet from the creek. This is based on a 50 foot pad depth. A survey of houses built within scenic areas of the community average 70 feet in depth. This would mean that the Shoreland setback could be 50 feet from the centerline of the creek. Of the projects surveyed within the Lower Purgatory Creek area, no shoreland setback variances have been granted. • Impact of Conservancy Area Encroachment and Shoreland Variances An overall tree inventory has been submitted which depicts specific tree types and sizes for the first phase of the project, and an overall general description of tree types for the balance of the property. Attachment B indicates the environmentally sensitive portions of the site. Within the conservancy area, areas 3 and 4 are the most sensitive based upon the size, type, and quality of the trees which are predominantly oak. Area 2, contains a small amount of tree cover, but is the closest area to the creek immediately adjacent to steep slopes. The creek follows the rear lot line of Lots 4, 5, and 6 and may be a safety issue if the creek continues to erode the slopes. Area 5 is the top part of a ravine, located approximately 500 feet from the centerline of the creek. Most of the trees in this area are box elder and elm. Gradina and Tree Loss There are a total of 1,847 inches of significant trees within the P.U.D. Trees in phase one total 389 inches, phase 2 totals 330 inches and 1,128 inches are within the conservancy area to the centerline of the creek. Grading will result in a 39% tree loss or 719 inches, two thirds of which are oak trees. Tree replacement would be 373 inches. Grading also removes understory vegetation along the steep slopes adjacent to Purgatory Creek. This vegetation provides slope stability, erosion control and is a significant part of the creek character, especially in areas 2, 3, and 4. 7 Twelve of the lots in the conservancy area are proposed at 50 foot pad depths. The attached survey of building permits issued in areas adjacent to creeks, lakes, and scenic areas average 70 feet in depth. With larger pads there will be additional grading, tree loss, and encroachment to Purgatory Creek conservancy area. Phase One Preliminary Plat Phase 1 depicts 23 lots on 8.6 acres at 2.64 units per acre. If this project was submitted by itself, a Comprehensive Guide Plan change would be required since the density exceeds 2 1/2 units per acre. However, the overall density of the total PUD is 2.44 units per acre. Lot sizes range from 11,200 square feet to 18,675 square feet with an average lot size of 14,031 square feet. Waivers are requested through the PUD District Review for lot sizes less than 13,500 square feet, and for street frontage less than 85 feet. Lot size waivers are requested for Lots 3-9, Block 2 and Lots 6, 9, and 10, Block 1. Street frontage waivers are required on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lots 6, 7, 11, and 12, Block 2. Utilities Sewer and water service is available by connection to existing facilities within Homeward Hills Road. Most of the storm water run-off will drain towards an existing storm sewer system in Homeward Hills Road, however, a portion of the project will drain towards Purgatory Creek. Since only phase one is proposed to be developed at this time, the storm sewer plan proposes a partial pipe and overland drainage swale down to Purgatory Creek. Additional overall storm water run-off information is necessary to evaluate the proposal and the impact on natural features and the creek corridor. If the overland drainage would result in tree loss and significant erosion, then the storm sewer system should be revised to connect to Homeward Hills Road or be carried by storm sewer pipe to Purgatory Creek. Videwalks and Trails There should be a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along one side of the loop road within phase one of the Village Knolls project. The second phase should include a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along one side of the loop road. nood Plain This site is adjacent to a flood plain area. No grading or filling is proposed within the flood plain. Conclusions The City is being asked to consider approval of a 42.7 acre, 69 lot PUD Concept plan and phase one approval for preliminary platting of 23 lots adjacent to Purgatory Creek. The Staff Report identifies grading and tree loss impacts in the conservancy area, and Shoreland area. Tree loss is calculated at 39%. The City should decide whether the site plan with PUD waivers for lot size and street frontage, shoreland variances, and conservancy area encroachment is better than if no waivers, variances or conservancy area encroachment was considered. The developer is proposing the dedication or preservation of 12.4 acres to the centerline of the creek as a trade-off for the shoreland variances and encroachment into the Purgatory Creek Conservancy Area. Historically, the City has approved lots in the conservancy area of Purgatory Creek, predicated upon no building or grading within the conservancy area. House pads and grading have been allowed in the conservancy area if there was a land trade for area outside of the conservancy that should be preserved such as steep slopes or woods. No shoreland setback variances have been approved. If the City feels that the impacts on the creek corridor are significant, there are a number of ways in which the site plan could be modified to reduce impacts in the conservancy and shoreland areas. These would include: 1. Use of cul-de-sacs instead of a through road to minimize filling in the ravines. 2. Fewer but larger lots adjacent to Purgatory Creek. 4 OAS 3. Shift the loop road further west. This would result in larger pads outside of the conservancy area, protect more of the wooded slopes and compliance with the 100 foot shoreland setback. ptaff Recommendations If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the development plans as proposed, then one option would be to recommend approval of the PUD Concept, preliminary plat and zoning request based on plans dated May 7, 1990 subject to recommendations in the Staff Report and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review proponent shall: A. Modify the site plan to eliminate the shoreland setback variances, and remove building pads and grading from the conservancy area. •• • B. Submit a tree replacement for 373 inches. C. Provide more detailed storm sewer information on overland drainage to Purgatory Creek. 2. Prior to final plat approval proponent shall: a. Submit detailed storm water run-off, utility, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. b. Submit detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall: a. Stake the proposed construction limits with a tree fence and notify the City 48 hours in advance of grading. 4. Current with construction of phase one construct a 5 foot wide sidewalk along the internal loop road. 5. Shoreland setback variances require review and approval by Board of Appeals and Adjustments. If the Planning Commission feels that the impacts on the site's natural features including trees, the conservancy area, and the shoreland area are significant, then one option would be to return the development plans to the proponent for revisions. VILKNOLS.MDF MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: May 11, 1990 SUBJECT: Purgatory Creek Master Plan and Residential Projects Within Shoreland Areas The Purgatory Creek Master Plan was prepared in 1975 as a guide for the City to review the development along the Purgatory Creek valley. The conservancy line was developed to define an area beyond which no development should occur. The conservancy line was drawn on a large scale and generally follows the rim of the creek valley, tree coverage, and contour lines. The purpose of the conservancy line was to establish a tentative boundary of a natural area that would be preseved along Purgatory Creek valley. Generally the City has required scenic easements or land to be dedicated on all land between the conservancy line and the creek. However, City Staff has, on occasion, recommende moving the conservancy line after field inspection of the proposed revision to determine what impact the revision might have on the character of the creek valley. If it was determined that the character of the creek valley would be preserved the conservancy line was changed. The Parks Commission has previously recommended that the Bluestem Hills 5th Addition and Creekview conservancy lines be modified. In both cases the developer proposed a land swap as a mitigating measure which gave the City control over more land along the creek than if the original conservancy line was adhered to. There have been several subdivisions approved along the lower Purgatory Creek area between County Road #1 and Riverview Road with lots platted within the conservancy; however, all building pads and grading have been outside of the conservancy. Scenic easements have been established over the concervancy area within the platted lots and the balance of the land along the creek was gifted to the City. Staff has reviewed a majority of subdivisions approved along the lower Purgatory Creek valley. The attached chart provides comparison between the subdivisions along the lower Purgatory Creek area. The following is a brief analysis of seven residential projects within Shoreland areas: Weston Bay Weston Bay is a 24 lot single family subdivision abutting Mitchell Lake. Mitchell Lake is classified as a natural environmental water 1 with a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet, minimum width at the building line of 150 feet, minimum width at the Ordinary High Water Mark, 150 feet, and a minimum setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark of 150 feet. None of the lots that abut Mitchell Lake met the requirements of the natural environmental water. The lot sizes range from 21,000 to 39,000 square feet with a 28,000 square foot average. Lake frontages range from 52 to 197 feet with a 100 foot average. All but one of the lake lots met the 150 foot setback requirement from the high water mark. This site was previously zoned for 60 townhome units. Weston Bay was approved for 24 single family lots. Variances were granted from the Shoreland Ordinance due to a reduction in density, the lot sizes proposed were comparable to existing lots in the Timber Lake residential project to the north (which was approved prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance) and all but one lot met the 150 foot setback requirement. There was a common lake access outlot which increased the average frontage and lot size which they traded away individual dock rights. - • Red Rock Ranch Red Rock Lake is classified as a recreational development water with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, minimum width building setback of 120 feet, minimum width at the Ordinary High Water Mark at 120 feet, and minimum setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark of 100 feet. The Red Rock Ranch plan had 31 lots abutting the lake. The initial plan included 17 variances for width at the high water mark and width at the building setback. This plan was revised based upon Planning Commission recommendation and the number of variances were reduced to two. The variances were granted since the lots on the wooded point average 44,000 square feet, the remainder of the lakeshore lots averaged 33,000 square feet and the average lakeshore width was 145 feet. This resulted in more trees saved on the wooded point, greater setbacks between houses, and less visual impact on the lake. Timber Creek Timber Creek is a mixed use residential project with 68 multiple family units and 40 single family units. Timber Creek abuts Purgatory Creek which is a general development water. Three variances were requested for lot width less than 120 feet for five single family lots and for lot size less than 10,000 square feet for one of the townhome buildings. The variances were granted due to 51 of the 89 acres being set aside for public use along the creek. Twenty-one of the 51 acres were in an oak wooded knoll that could have been developed. Creekview The Creekview residential project abutted Purgatory Creek with a net density of 1.5 units per acre. The initial plan reviewed by 2 the Planning Commission had shoreland setback variances for 20 lots. The project was revised based upon Planning Commission and City Council recommendations to meet all requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance. In addition, approximately 15 acres on Purgatory flood plain was gifted to the City. Scenic easement s were required on all steep slopes adjacent to the creek. Shores qf Mitobell_Lake Mitchell Lake is classified as a natural environmental water wit h a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet, a 150 foot buildin g setback from the lake, and 150 feet of lot width required. Variances were granted for 10 of the 27 lots within the shorelan d area. The variances were grantedfor setback to 100 feet on 5 lot s and lot width to 100 on 5 lots, since the overall density withi n the area was in excess of one acre, the average setback was in excess of 150 feet, and the average lake frontage was 225 feet. Five acres of- land adjacent to the lake which contained a significant number of 24 to 40 inch oak trees was also dedicated to the City.-, ARM= It appears that consideration for shoreland variances in some of the projects were based on trade-offs which resulted in a better site plan which saved more trees and topography with benefits for the City. PUROMP.MDF:bs 3 Is lop 200 Yes 17 120 300 Yes 23 300 300 .Yes Creekview 78 93 Bluffs W. 7th 4.6 11 AOWAGE 42.1 66 1.3 15-acre gift 2.36 2.42 acre 1.77 digcation 1 27 200 350 Yes 1 2 300 300 —17-47 9.4 19.9 191 315 Land Gift or Subdivision Acres Units Density Dedication Hillsborough 16 34 2.2 3.4-are gift March 1987 gift Number of Lots in Conservancy Area Number of Lots in Transition Area Minimum Average Scenic Creek Creek Easement Setback Setback Over Consery 19 300 300 Yes 17 15 0 0 Creekview Estates 25 29 1.5 6-acre • M1/40,',1 1980 dedication Bluffs West 4th. 14.3 19 1.3 4.3-acre May 1985 gift Bluffs East 5th 30 15 1.9 50-acre gift in PUD Bluestem Hills 31.6 64 . 2.0 gift August 1986 15 120 250 Yes Bluff West 1st 100 210 2.2 land gift 7 13 200 200 Yes BUILDING PAD DEPTHS ON ESTIMATED HOUSE VALUES OVER $300,000 (Source: Lot surveys of April 4-June 1, 1989) Porch Deck If 14' Deck/Porch Addition Lot Block Building Pad Depth Y N added, rev. pad Welters Bryant Pointe Welter 1 Oly Hills 3 Creekview Cardinal Hills Bluestem 5 *Bryant Lake Est Cardinal Hills *Red Rock Heights Bluffs East 5 2 49' 12 1 90' 2 1 60' 3 3 88' 6 ? (L84')42' 4 2 70' 11 1 68' ? (1128975, 12 1 48' 4 1 75' 12 1 (L96980' 104' 56' 89' 94' *Minimum building pad depth should be 70 feet. BUILDING PAD DEPTHS ON ESTIMATED HOUSE VALUES OF $200,000 - $300,000 (Source: Lot surveys of April 4-3une 1, 1989) Porch Deck If 14' Deck/Porch Lot Block Building Pad Depth Y N added rev. pad 4 2 64' 78' 5 3 63' 2 46' 60' 9 1 50' 5 1 52' 5 2 62' 2 2 50' 3 2 58' 13 1 68' 4 4 65' 9 2 (L75')50' 4 4 64' 78' 5 2 49' 2 7 52' .5 2 66' 1 2 64' 14 3 48, 62' 4 1 63' 8 3 68' Addition Kingston Kingston Promotory Bluestem 5 *Timber Lakes Starrwood Shady Oak Ridge Bluffs West 5 Starrwood Bluffs West 5 Bluestem 5 Carmel *Weston Bay Tree Farm Edenvale 10 Cardinal Ridge Cardinal Hills Bluestem Hills Starrwood *Lake lot - minimum building pad depth should be 60 feet. ..)41100 BRYANT POINT 6-89 Building Pad Lot Block Length Depth .19 1 80' 63' 22 1 107'. 55' 20 1 118' 75' 21 1 110' 76' 17 1 92'-. 80' 23 1 104' 65' 4 1 120' 76' 24 1 83' 54' 3 1 88' 90' 24 1 106' 63' 2 2 80' 56' Porch/Deck Yes No If 14' Porch/Deck added, Rev. Pad Depth 77' I PROPOSED SITE i 11 -M\TPUB! _L 1: AREA LOCATION MAP , n I " 1_ I / STAPP REPORT Planning Commission yRom: Scott A. Kipp, Planner THEM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning RUM May 25, 1990 SUBJECT: Bentec Addition LOCATION: 13050 Pioneer Trail APPLICANT/ yEE OWNER: Bentec Engineering Corporation• MMOUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment and Sits Plan Review within the Office Zoning District on 1.85 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. BACEGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this site and sites to the east and west as Low Density Residential, with the property to the south guided Industrial. Surrounding land uses consist of the Yorkshire Point neighborhood to the east, zoned R1-13.5, Nelson Plumbing and Heating zoned 1-2 to the south, Associated Well Drillers and a single family home zoned 1-2 and Rural respectively to the west, with Highway 169 to the north. In 1981 the single family house located on this site was rezoned from Rural to the Office Zoning District with a variance granted for less than 75% facebrick. A condition of the variance required that compliance to the materials code take place within five years, or risk the property being rezoned Rural. A preliminary plat of the property into 1 lot was Bentec Addition May 25, 2990 approved at that time but never final platted. BITE PLAN The site consists of 1.85 acres, which includes a .4 acre parcel being dedicated as Highway right-of-way. An addition is proposed on each end of the existing structure for a total building square footage of 5,460, with a Base Area Ratio of 5% and a Floor Area Ratio of 8% well within Code requirements. Due to the dedication of Highway right-of-way, the property line will be within 18 feet of the proposed structure and 20 feet from the existing structure. Since a 35 foot front yard setback is required within the Office Zoning District, a variance will be necessary from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office use, a total of 27 parking stalls is required. Sixteen spaces currently occupy the property. Because of the limited number of employees at this company, the additional parking should be placed into proof-of- parking at this time, maintaining maximum green space. A truck ' lane has been added along the west side of the site to access a proposed overhead door. ARCHITECTURE Each "end cap" addition proposed for the site is designed to meet existing roof pitches and building height. A shingled roof will be maintained on the additions as well. As required by the 1981 variance, the proponent is upgrading the structure to meet the building materials code. Seventy five percent of the structure shall be facebrick and glass with the remainder as existing wood and masonry. UTILITIES The current structure utilizes an on-site well and septic system. The proposal indicates connection to City sewer along the east property line, with the well remaining as their water source. LANDSCAPING The site currently has a generous landscaping design which includes numerous evergreens, many of which exceed 10 feet in height. Based on the total building square footage, 17 caliper inches are required. Twenty seven caliper inches are being provided to aid in the screening of the overhead door and the parking lot area from the neighboring residential uses. Benton Addition /lay 25, 1990 LIGHTING No additional site lighting has been identified as part of this submittal. yxmai PLATTING The preliminary plat approved for this site was never final platted or recorded. The property currently exists as two lots with the parking lot staggering an existing lot line. Since this proposal does not change the preliminary plat other than indicating the actual highway dedication, the proponent requests that the final plat of the property be approved at the City Council based on the 1981 preliminary plat approval. • gscomartmATioNs Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review within the Office District on 1.85 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on plans dated May 24, 1990, this Staff Report, and the following: 1. Prior to any grading of the property, the proponent shall submit erosion control plans to the Watershed District and City Engineer for review. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: a. Final plat the property and record at Hennepin County. b. Provide detailed sanitary sewer connection plans to the Engineering Department for their review. C. Submit a bond to cover the installation of the proposed landscaping plan. d. Receive approval of a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for a front yard setback from 35 feet down to 18 feet. BENTECSR.SAK:mmr 3 JUNE 19.1990 60229 MINNEGASCO 60230 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 60231 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION 0232 PETTY CASH-COMMUNITY CENTER 233 BIRTCHER WELSH COMPANY si234 JASON NORTHCO PROP &D235 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC 60236 EAGLE WINE COMPANY 60237 GRIGGS COOPER & COMPANY 60238 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COMPANY 60239 RD PHILLIPS & SONS 60240 PRIOR WINE CO 80241 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO 60242 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRU 80243 SOUTHWEST TRAILS 60244 MARY LEE BENSON 60245 BRUCE FERDEN 60246 FREDERICK FREY 60247 KATHY ODEGAARD 60248 SHARON PETERSON_.: 60249 PRUDENCE MAINOR 60250 SUE SEIFERT. 60251 TOUCH WONDER 60252 SIGN-TIFIC 60253 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV 60254 VOID OUT CHECK 60255 COMMUNICATIONS WORLD 60256 AT&T 60257 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 01258 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 259 AT&T o0260 THE LOFT 80261 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION 60262 PETTY CASH 60263 DANA GIBBS 60264 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 60265 TOYS R US 60266 BRADLEY PRODUCTIONS SERVICE SERVICE BLACKTOP-SEWER DEFT EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER JUNK '90 RENT-CITY HALL JUNE '90 RENT-LIQUOR STORE JUNE '90 RENT-LIQUOR STORE WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE LIQUOR WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT OF STATE TRAIL GRANT REFUND-STARING LAKE PARK BLDG RENTAL REFUND-HOCKEY SCHOOL REFUND-FAMILY MEMBERSHIP REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-GARDEN PLOT REFUND-SKATING LESSONS/SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-STREET OF DREAMS OUTING BUILDING SIGNS-POLICE DEPT SERVICE 60 PERCENT OF PHONE SYSTEM-POLICE DEPT SERVICE SERVICE PLUMBING PERMIT-6850 ALPINE TRAIL SERVICE T-SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS CONFERENCE-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND EXPENSES-CITY HALL SERVICE-PACKET DELIVERY MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS & EXCISE TAX GAMES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND -ENTERTAINMENT-TORCH RUN-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 4124.34 15140.88 137.61 25.16 23828.51 6983.16 5018.80 684.07 5458.87 2991.71 5689.88 375.15 2148.74 50906.25 3009.58 26.50 80.00 92.10 22.00 19.00 8.00 55.00 2.00 23.50 88.45 0.00 17898.60 589.53 139.76 1570.50 421.55 363.60 40.00 47.27 192.00 1062.08 25.98 100.00 60267 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE PAYROLL 6/1/90 60268 CROW WING COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 60269 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 6/1/90 60270 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 6/1/90 60271 HENN CI? SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 60272 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 6/1/90 60273 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST PAYROLL 6/1/90 60274 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 6/1/90 60275 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 6/1/90 60276 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 6/1/90 60277 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT 60278 WEST SIDE MOTORS INC ZAMBONI STARTER-COMMUNITY CENTER 60279 JAMES KLINE EXPENSES FOR K-9 TRIALS-POLICE DEPT 60280 VISATEX CORPORATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE-POLICE DEPT 60281 MENARDS ARTIFICIAL GRASS-GOLF LESSONS 60282 SCOTT JOHNSON WOOD FOR BOTTLE RACKS ON TRUCKS-FIRE DEPT '5507857 12534.03 186.00 60729.75 4719.60 194.76 32.00 2014.04 25.00 30194.26 209.50 131.50 135.45 175.00 4500.00 27.48 80.06 JUNE 19.1990 60283 RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK )284 J L SHIELY COMPANY ,0285 PERFORMANCE CONPirrn FORMS 60286 VOID OUT CHECK 80287 SHEILA EADES 60288 ROSE PRIEVE 60289 MGSHP 60290 STANLEY STEELIER CARPET CLEANING 80291 MINNESOTA MEDICAL FOUNDATION 60292 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 60293 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 60294 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV 80295 MN COMMERCE DEPT 60296 MIEWAY MOTOR LODGE 80297 HOLIDAY INN 80298 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 60299 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC 80300 NORM KORN 7* 60301 MN DEPT OF MUM SAFETY 80302 MAUREEN HAMILTON 60303 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP 60304 BEER WHOLESALERS INC 80305 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO 60308 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO 63307 HOME JUICE PRODUCTS 1308 PEPSI COLA COMPANY .309 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO 60310 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 60311 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 80312 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 60313 ANDRUS AGENCY INC 80314: EAGLE WINE CO 60315 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 80316 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 60317 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO 60318 PRIOR WINE CO 60319 QUALITY WINE CO 60320 CHRIS ENGER 60321 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 60322 STREET OF DREAMS 60323 FIRST MINNETONKA CITY BANK 60324 RICHARD KNUTSON INC 60325 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO 60326 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 60327 AAA STRIPING SERVICE CO 60328 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING 60329 GENE ABBOTT 60330 ABLE IDEAS 60331 ACE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS INC '332 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC -CITY'S SHARE OF CHAIN OF LAKES PROJECT COST SAND-WATER DEPT COPY PAPER/COMPUTER PAPER-CITY HALL REFUND-GOLF LESSONS REFUND-GOLF LESSONS -STATE DUES FOR HORSESHOE LEAGUE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORE SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE NOTARY COMMISSION-FINANCE DEPT CONFERENCE-SEWER DEPT CONFERENCE-SEWER DEPT CONFERENCE-SEWER DEPT CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT REFUND-OVERPAYMENT OF SOFTBALL LEAGUE FEE MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION & EXCISE TAX 1ST AID & CPR INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID MIX BEER BEER BEER MIX MIX BEER BEER MIX BEER SERVICE-CITY HALL SITE SELECTION WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE WINE WINE MAY '90 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT CONFERENCE-ASSESSING DEPT -STREET OF DREAMS VAN TOUR-SENIOR GTE/FEES PAID -LAND ACQUISTION-JIM BOYCE PROPERTY- STARING LAKE PARK SERVICE-BLUFF ROAD SERVICE-CEDAR RIDGE STORM SEWER SOD CUTTER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE STREET STRIPING-STREET DEFT DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID SCHOOL-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT PRINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER CLEANING SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ COMMUNITY CENTER 8333.00 391.84 557.92 0.00 27.00 27.00 84.00 329.20 2675.00 18320.51 653.42 17.85 10.00 330.00 299.70 240.00 525.00 100.00 452.20 300.00 226.73 2287.08 8909.51 24401.15 18.44 480.34 349.70 18710.39 846.92 31231.07 682.50 699.40 5833.33 10710.87 4233.83 983.96 1901.03 200.00 455.00 33.00 675000.00 20862.51 81167.05 111.30 6324.68 203.00 306.41 29.30 196.20 1396.45 92844277 JUNE 19.1990 60333 HERBERT S ADOLPHSON 60334 ADVANCED HUNTER EDUCATION c335 AIRSIGNAL INC 336 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 60337 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO 60338 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN 60339 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW 60340 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC 60341 THOMAS AMUNDSEN 60342 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC 60343 ANDERSON'S GARDEN 60344 ANDON INC 60345 ASSN OF TRAINING OFFICERS OF MN 60346 ASTLEFORD INTL INC 60347 AUTOCON INDUSTRIES INC 60348 AYR INC 60349 B & S TOOLS R0350 BACHMAN'S ( 351 KATHRYN BARKER W352 PATRICIA BARKER 60353 BARRY & SEWALL 60354 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC 60355 BENNETT CYCLE 60356 BEST & FLANAGAN 60357 BERGIN AUTO BODY 60358 BRUCE BETTENDORF 60359 BIG A AUTO PARTS - CHANHASSEN 60360 DONNA MARIE BOLLER 60361 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC 60362 LEE BRANDT 60363 ED BRION 60364 BRO-TRX INC 60365 WESTON W BYRON 60366 BRW INC 367 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 368 BSN SPORTS 4812132 EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 15.00 FIREARM SAFETY INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 90.00 JUNE '90 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 144.63 AUDIO RECORDER-POLICE DEPT 290.00 -UNIFORMS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT/SEWER 1677.21 -DEPT/WATER DEPT/FACILITIES DEPT/STREET -DEPT/PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY -CENTER/ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT/POLICE DEPT/ MOP HEADS & UTILITY CLOTH-LIQUOR STORE DUES-PLANNING DEPT L5.001 DUES-POLICE DEPT 35.00 BOOKS-WATER DEPT 106.27 BASEBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 78.00 1 -BATTERIES/FLASHER CIRCUITS/POSTS/SIGNS- 1510.00 SEWER DEPT/STREET DEFT SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE 23.82 -HELIUM TANK RENTAL/BALLOONS/RIBBON/CLIPS- 100.15 COMMUNITY CENTER CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 70.00 MIRROR ARMS/SHAFT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 118.38 1 FUSES/TRANSISTORS/FILTERS-WATER DEPT 1231.53 ! CEMENT FOR CURB REPAIR-STREET MAINTENANCE 161.38 -PLIERS/SAW BLADES/MEASURING TAPE/PUNCH 639.45 -SETS/HAMMER/BRUSHES/OIL/WIRE WHEELS/AIR -COUPLERS/WRENCHES/KEYS/LOCK/CABINET/ -CRIMPERS-SEWER DEPT/WATER DEPT/STREET DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-AWARDS BANQUET-CITY COUNCIL 26.79 AIRPOT CARAFE-CITY HALL 36.03 MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 10.75 RUST PROTECTION PAINT-WATER DEPT 119.22 HEADLIGHTS/SIGNAL LIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 29.22 -BICYCLE STAND/BICYCLE MAINTENANCE 150.00 INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID -EXAMINATION OF TITLE-BOYCE PROPERTY- 200.00 STARING LAKE PARK -PAINT & REFINISH POLICE VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT 224.00 MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 232.50 -SHOCKS/BLOWER MOTOR/OIL SEALS/OIL FILTERS/ 1467.60 -AIR FILTERS/FUEL FILTERS/BATTERIES/ -EXTENSION PIPES/MUFFLERS/TAIL PIPES/ -TRAILER BALL/SEAT CUSHIONS/GASKETS- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEFT 49.00 -DIESEL CAB & CHASSIS-STREET DEPT/GEAR/BAR- 34807.90 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 349.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 302.50 TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 292.86 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 201.50 -SERVICE-HIGHWAY 5/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 1898.64 INTERCHANGE GRAVEL-PARK MAINTENANCE 1340.69 BASKETBALL NETS-PARK MAINTENANCE 77.00 60369 60370 371 (372 373 60374 60375 60376 NATHAN BUCK BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION BUSINESS CREDIT LEASING INC CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS CITY ENGINEERS ASSN OF MN CLASSLINE INC CLUTCH & U-JOINT BURNSVILLE INC CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC 80377 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO 80378 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 80379 CONCEPT MICROFILM INC 60380 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 80381 =TACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC 80382 COPY EQUIPMENT INC 60383 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC 60384 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC 60385 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC 60386 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY 80387 DALCO 60388 DAN & DAN'S MINUTEMAN PRESS 60389 DAYTIMERS INC 80390 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 60391 DELEGARD TOOL CO 392 DAN DESAULNIERS 60393 EUGENE DIETZ 60394 DONS SOD SERVICE 60395 DPC INDUSTRIES INC 60396 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 60397 PAULA DUNNUM 60398 DYNA SYSTEMS 60399 E P PHOTO 60400 EDEN INCENTIVES & PROMOTIONS 80401 DEB EDLUND 60402 JOHN H EKLUND 60403 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS 60404 ELSMORE AQUATIC 60405 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC 60406 EMI INC 60407 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC 60408 FIDELITY 60409 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN 60410 FIRST TECH COMPUTER 60411 FLAHERTY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 60412 FLOYD SECURITY , 60413 FORMAN FORD PAINT I 414 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY JUNK 19.1990 FOOTBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 78.00 SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 180.00 JULY '90 COPIER RENTAL-FIRE DEPT 182.75 HELMETS-FORESTRY DEPT 104.85 DUES-ENGINEERING DEPT 25.00 BADGES-POLICE DEPT 162.50 GASKET/CLUTCH RETAINER-EQUIPMENT MAINT 8.50 -HOSES/BEARINGS/SEALS/BRAKE DRUM TURNING/ 433.64 BRAKE SHOES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 1278.80 -RADIO CABLIVAN'TENNAS/CONNECTOR-EQUIRSINT 446.90i MAINTENANCE -MICROFICHE/FILM-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 92.80 COMMISSION SEAL COATING/HANDLE/BROOM-STREET MAINT 4358.00 RADIO REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 110.00 PAINT-STREET MAINTENANCE 109.20 MAY '90 SERVICE-INSURANCE CONSULTANT 1660.00 LUBRICANT-WATER DEPT 203.93 STEERING GEAR-.EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 322.35 QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 5018.14 PUMP/PUMP VALVE REPAIR-PARK MAINTENANCE 346.50 -PRINTING FORMS/FLYERS-FIRE DEPT/BUILDING 1279.40 -INSPECTIONS DEPT/JULY 4TH CELEBRATION/ POOL LESSONS OFFICE SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEFT 19.73 RADIO-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 89.50 -SHELF/PRY BARS/CABLE TIES/DISCONNECT TOOL- 81.20 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 108.50 MAY '90 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 201.75 SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE 46.20 CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 9099.20 EXPENSES-POLICE DEFT 29.66 AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 100.00 DRILL BITS/WASHERS-WATER DEFT 479.00 FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT 105.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 148.13 MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION 400.00 APRIL '90 WASTE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 35.00 -CULVERTS/MANHOLE COVERS/RINGS-DRAINAGE 1537.83 CONTROL/SEWER DEPT SHIRTS-POOL LESSONS 590.15 GLOVES-WATER DEPT 129.74 REBUILD CHEMICAL FEEDER-WATER DEFT 258.33 CHEMICALS-PARK MAINTENANCE 266.33 GARBAGE BAGS-WATER DEPT 176.28 TRAINING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 100.00 -PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE-HUMAN RESOURCES 110.00 DEFT ENGINE GENERATOR REPAIR-POLICE DEPT -3RD QUARTER '90 SECURITY SYSTEM-CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD PAINT ROLLERS-COMMUNITY CENTER SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 815.83 23.00 60.00 22.20 3123154 JUNE 19.1990 CASSETTE TAPES-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 21.00 -COVERALLS/MOP HEADS-WATER DEPT/TOWELS- 511.36 PARK MAINTENANCE/LIQUOR STORE 2 CABS & CHASSIS .-FIRE DEFT 118790.90 MAY '90 SERVICE-SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 1923.00 TIRE REPAIR/TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1975.53 SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 195.00 -SHELF KIT/PANEL KIT/BIN UNIT/DIVIDER KIT- 198.84 WATER DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 62.00 MAY '90 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 11501.41 ! MAY '90 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 200.00 -CONNECTION CORDS/PLUG/CIRCUIT SERVICE 1437.43 -PANEL/CIRCUIT BREAKERS/THROW SWITCH- -EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHT REPAIRS-PARK MAINTENANCE LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 360.15 -SLIDING BACKGLASS WINDOWS-EQUIPMENT 428.00 MAINTENANCE DOOR-COMMUNITY.. CENTER 345.00 MILEAGE-RECREATION/MINISTRATION 41.25 FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 158.00 APRIL '90 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 123.98 APRIL '90 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 1059.75 TONER-WATER DEPT 80.45 OIL-WATER DEFT 44.45 FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 563.15 -REFRIGERATION SYSTEM REPAIR/NITROGEN/ 698.55 -INSTALLED VACUUM PUMP/VENTS/DEGREASER/ -GASKETS/CHANGED OIL IN VACUUM PUMP-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER -MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR WATER TREATMENT 3690.00 PLANT EQUIPMENT -WIRE/TAILGATE PROTECTOR/TRUCK BED MAT & 336.61 & CAP-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HYDRANT SIGNS-WATER DEFT 191.81 JULY '90 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 424.32 AUTO DECALS-POLICE DEPT 660.00 -COPIES-RECREATION SUPERVISOR/CITY'S SHARE 79.30 CARTAGE FOR YOUNG AUDIENCES CONCERT PULLEY-WATER DEPT 28.27 PRINTING-POSTCARDS/BROCHURES-POLICE DEFT 253.60 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL & COORDINATOR/FEES PAID 449.50 EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 78.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 400.30 AIR FILTERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 170.04 -NA I LS /STUDS /SCREWS /BOLTS/WATER SEALANT/ 43.59 LUMBER-SEWER DEFT/WATER DEFT/POLICE DEPT BLACK DIRT-PARK MAINTENANCE 58.50 DRIVER GEAR-WATER DEPT 140.15 -DRILL/BENCH VISE/DRIVE EXTENSION-WATER 268.85 DEPT/WRENCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -PULL/REPAIR & INSTALL WELL PUMP-$15146.00/ 26797.59 -REPAIR PARTS TO MODIFY WELL PUMP- -$10405.59/DISASSEMBLE & REASSEMBLE BOWLS/ SANDBLAST & PAINT COLUMN-WATER DEFT 60415 LYNIELL FREY 60416 G & K SERVICES 417 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP W418 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC 60419 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVIC 60420 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE 60421 W W GRAINGER INC 60422 MARK GRANOWSKI 60423 GRANT MERRITT & ASSOCIATES LTD 80424 ALAN GRAY 60425 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC 60426 HACH CO 60427 HARMON GLASS 60428 HAUENSTEIN & BURMEISTER INC 60429 LAURIE MELLING 60430 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 60431 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT 60432 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 60433 D C HEY COMPANY INC 60434 HIAWATHA OIL COMPANY 60435 HOFFERS INC 60436 HOWSTEN ICE RINKS INC 60437 HONEYWELL INC 60438 HOPKINS PARTS CO 60439 HYDRA-SHIELD MFG INC 60440 IBM CORPORATION 60441 THE IMAGE DEVELOPERS 60442 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 0272 60443 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 60444 INSTY-PRINTS 60445 GARY ISAACS 60446 JERRY'S NEWMARKET 60447 JM OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 60448 JOHNSON CONTROLS 60449 JUSTUS LUMBER CO 60450 KAHNKE BROTHERS INC 60451 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 60452 DAN N KANTAR 60453 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO 17476807 A 60454 60455 60456 60457 (0458 159 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LANOLINE COMMUNICATIONS SERV INC LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER SHARON B LANE CINDY LANENBERG LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD 60460 LEER BROS INC 60461 LINHOFF CORPORATE COLOR 60462 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC 60463 LUND'S INC 80464 RICHARD LUGEANBEAE 60485 MARKHURD 60466 COUNTS MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 60467 MATES AUTO SERVICE INC 60468 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS 60469 SUSAN MC CARVILLE 80470 MCGLYNN BAKERIES_INC 80471 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC 80472 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC 60473 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO 60474 DAVID G MEYER 60475 MICRORIM 60476 MIENEST ASPHALT CORP 60477 BRAD MILES 60478 HERMAN MILLER INC 60479 MPLS ST PAUL METROPOLITAN AIRPORT ( 480 MINNCOMM PAGING 60481 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY 60482 MN INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE INC 60483 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL INC 60484 MINNESOTA SEAWEED EATERS 60485 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS 60486 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE INC 60487 MIXING EQUIPMENT CO 60488 MONA MEYER & MCGRATH 60489 BERNADINE MORGAN 60490 MSP AIRPORT NEWS 60491 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT SENSOR FOR MONITOR-SEWER DEFT GRASS SEED-STREET MAINTENANCE SERVICE-UTILITY BILLING MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT -JANUARY '90 LEGAL SERVICE/FEBRUARY '90 PROSECUTION COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/FORESTRY DEPT TIRE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT DIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID PRINTS-WATER DEPT FIRST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT TOWING-POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -TYPESETTING FLYERS-JULY 4TH CELEBRATION/ -HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION/ HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION SCHOOL-COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR CTR EXPENSES-CITY HALL/SENIOR CENTER EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT.. OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT GOLF & TENNIS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID COMPUTER SOFTWARE-PLANNING DEPT CONCRETE-SEWER DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT PANEL ASSEMBLY-FACILITIES DEFT -BALLFIELD RENTAL -FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT- PARK MAINTENANCE -JUNE '90 PAGER SERVICE-SEWER DEPT/STREET DEPT/FIRE DEPT NOZZLES/HOSES-WATER DEPT SAFETY SHOES-WATER DEFT CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT -SERVICE-SEAWEED HARVESTING-ROUND LAKE BEACH AREA ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE TREES-FORESTRY DEFT -OIL SEALS/GASKETS/O-RINGS/BEARINGS/GEARS FOR RAPID MIXER-WATER DEFT -APRIL '90 SERVICE-MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION KIDS KORNER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES -WASHER/BLADES/V-BELTS/TURF SWEEPER- -$8313.00/2 GROUNDSMASTER MOWERS MINUS TRADE-INS-$16328.00-PARK MAINTENANCE ROCK-STREET MAINTENANCE -BALL BEARINGS/SNAP RINGS/O-RINGS/SEALS/ KEYS/GASKETS/IMPELLAR-WATER DEPT LENS/POWER STEERING UNIT-EQUIPMENT MAINT DUES-PARK & RECREATION DEFT 528.01 195.00 92.00 225.00 53.75 17300.96 88.39 34.93 198.95 88.30 96.75 120.00 378.79 93.00 261.95 48.00 311.08 31.55 12.08 65.10 602.00 175.00 55.43 25.65 123.76 556.80 166.74 158.36 235.80 249.00 750.00 151.20 100.50 4138.99 516.90 243.00 98.00 24810.00 29.84 1288.45 236.81 210.00 60492 NM MUELLER & SONS INC 60493 BERNARD J MULCAHY CO INC 60494 MUNICILITE CO 60495 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSN 5514580 JUNE 19.1990 60496 NATIONAL SCREENPRINT UNIFORMS FOR BEACH & POOL STAFF 1103.18 ( 497 NATURAL GREEN INC IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR-WATER DEFT 46.58 498 DENNIS NESBITT MILEAGE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 11.00 ,O499 NORTH STAR SOUND INC -STORAGE TRUNK FOR SOUND SYSTEM 349.00 ACCESSORIES-STARING LAKE PARK AMPHITHEATER 60500 NORTH STAR WATERWORKS PRODUCTS HYDRANT PARTS-WATER DEPT 185.00 60501 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS FACSIMILE PAPER/INK FILM-CITY HALL 171.75 60502 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO -LIGHT FIXTURES/FUSES-FACILITIES DEPT/ 180.85 STREET LIGHTING DEPT 80503 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT CO I -SNAP RINGS/BEARINGS/SHAFT SLEEVE FOR SLUDGE PUMP-WATER DEPT 80504 NORTHWOOD GAS CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 80505 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT-SEWER DEPT 80508 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC -PRINTER REPAIR/RIBBONS/TONER CARTRIDGE- WATER DEPT/CITY HALL 80507 BILL OLSON BLACK DIRT-STREET MAINTENANCE 72.50 80508 ROBERT OLSON EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 21.00 80509 HARVEY H ORTLOFF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 480.50 80510 PAPER WAREHOUSE -PAPER PLATES/COTTON BALLS/PAPER CUPS/ 58.40 -MASKING TAPE/FORKS/KNIVES/PAPER TOWELS- AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/OUTDOOR CENTER 60511 ANDREA PATTERSON -SERVICE-ICE SHOW COSTUMES/EXPENSES- 863.07 COMMUNITY CENTER 80512 DANIEL S PERNULA GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 210.00 80513 PEPSI COLA COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 58.00 80514 OONNIE L PETERS SCHOOL-COMMUNITY CENTER 94.00 60515 NANCE LEE PETERSOW AQUA AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 307.00 , 1518 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC MINT-WATER DEPT 50.08 k )517 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -INSTALLED & WIRED TEMPORARY LIGHTING FOR 757.70 -ICE SHOW-$682.55/HUMIDIFIER REPAIR- COMMUNITY CENTER 80518 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -OIL STAIN/KEYS/UTILITY BLADES/SPRAY PAINT/ 98.75 -SCREWS/LACQUER THINNER/CAULKING GUN/ -WASHERS/HARDWARE/LOCKS/CLIPS/ANCHORS-FIRE DEPT 80519 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -FAN/BATTERIES/PAINT/GLOVES/BOLTS/WASHERS/ 440.19 -BRACKETS/BRUSHES/SOLDER/TAPE/DRYER HOSE/ -KEYS/SAFETY GLASSES/WRENCHES/OIL/CLOCK/ SANDPAPER/DRILL BITS-COMMUNITY CENTER 60520 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -HANDLES/DUCT TAPE/MARKERS/FACE MASKS/ 338.98 -PAINT/BLADES/UTILITY KNIVES/ROPE/PAINT -BRUSHES/SANDING BELT/PLUMBERS PUTTY/BOLTS/ -WASHERS/CHAIN/DRILL BIT/SCREWS/HINGES/ -CLAMPS/SPONGES/RUST PROTECTOR/OIL/ COUPLINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE 60521 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -KEYS/GARBAGE CANS/POWER STRIP/VARNISH/ -MASKING TAPE/BRUSHES/SANDPAPER/BUNGE -CORDS/MALLET/STAPLER/WRENCH/SHOVELS/RAKE/ BROOM/PAINT/SLEDGE HAMMER-POLICE DEPT 60522 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -WASHERS/SCREWS/ANCHORS/CORKS/ELECTRIC -TAPE/SPONGE/BOLTS/HANDLE/WIRE BRUSH- SEWER DEPT/WATER DEPT , 60523 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -SPRAY PAINT/BLADES/HOSES/CONNECTORS/ 171.32 -CLAMPS/PLUGS/BOLTS/PIPE/THERMOCOUPLERS/ -CLIP/DOOR SPRING/SURGE SUPPRESSORS/FUSES/ BRUSHES-STREET DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 771.83 - •-4 173.13 87.50 279.40 217.80 239.73 781602 60524 PRAIRIE HARDWARE -VARNISH/BRUSHES/PLASTIC WOOD/HINGES/PIPE/ -HANDLES/COUPLERS/POLE/DRILL BITS/CHAIN/ -CLIPS/PAINT ROLLERS/BROOM/TRAYS/KNOBS/ -BRACKETS/BATTERIES/NUTS & BOLTS/GASKETS/ -SEALANT/CLEANING SUPPLIES/LADDER-WATER DEPT 60525 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING FORMS-ASSESSING DEPT 60526 J A PRICE AGENCY INC LIABILITY INSURANCE 60527 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE SERVICE-CITY HALL 60528 PSQ LEASING & MAINTENANCE -3RD QUARTER TELEPHONE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 60529 PUMP & mrnms SERVICE INC TANK STICK/PLUG/OIL/FLOATS-EGUIRIENT MAINT 60530 AAGK REFFSGAARD MENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 60531 SCOTT REIN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60532 MICHAEL RIGGLE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60533 ROBOTRONICS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 60534 ROGER'S SERVICE ALTERNATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 60535 ROGNESS SERVICE SALES TIMER-COMMUNITY CENTER 60536 RUFFRIDGE-JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO IN -1 TON STEEL ROLLER & TRAILER MINUS TRADE IN-STREET DEPT 60537 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 60538 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-STREET MAINTAIATER MT 60539 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE 60540 WILBUR W SCHULTZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60541 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 60542 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY TAPE/LABELS-WATER DEPT 60543 SHAKOPEE FORD INC -LAMP ASSEMBLY/REFLECTORS/MOTOR ASSEMBLY/ -CABLE/GAUGES/STRAPS/DEFLECTOR ASSEMBLY- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE "n544 SIGN-TIFIC SIGNS-POLICE DEPT , 545 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC SHIRTS-POLICE DEPT 60546 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP -CLIPS/RAIL/SOCKETS/DRILL BITS/PUNCH-WATER DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 60547 SPORTS & SOAPS ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 60548 SPORTS WORLD USA SHIRTS-COMMUNITY BAND 60549 STANDARD SPRING CO REMOVE & REPLACE SPRING-WATER DEPT 60550 STAT-MEDICAL INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEFT 60551 STEPP MFG CO INC THERMOSTAT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 60552 STREICHRRS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -LAMP/GRILLE LIGHTS/SWITCH/PRISONER -RESTRAINT SYSTEM-$710.00/HEADLIGHT KIT/ -RIOT GUN HOLDERS-POLICE DEFT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 60553 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE VIEW CTR TRAFFIC STUDY 60554 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -GENERATOR/ALTERNATOR CORE/BOLTS/DOOR -HANDLE/SENSOR/TRANSMISSION REPAIR/EXHAUST -MANIFOLD/REPAIR DOOR HINGES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 60555 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC WASTE DISPOSAL-OUTDOOR CENTER 60556 TANK RE-NU OF MINNESOTA REBUILD GAS TANK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 60557 THE TEACHERS PET TOYS-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 60558 LOWELL THONE EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 60559 VAL TRADER AEROBICS INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 60560 TRIAROO ARTS & CRAFTS INC CONSTRUCTION PAPER-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 60561 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO ACETYLENE/HELIUM-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 699524 536.13 99.45 19746.00 105.00 1465.50 376.04 15.00 496.00 143.00 36.00 62.85 82.95 7195.00 46.20 122.83 545.24 232.50 71.54 272.81 514.17 20.00 162.25 38.96 416.00 198.90 124.70 139.70 62.00 2449.55 160.02 292.54 83.06 90.00 28.80 15.00 75.00 298.09 176.66 60562 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED (: 1583 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 364 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 0585 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PROPANE INC 60566 VAN WATERS & ROGERS 60567 VESSC) INC 60568 CHUCK VEST 60569 VIKING LABORATORIES INC 60570 VISU SEWER CLEAN & SEAL INC 60571 VOSS ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY 80572 BILL WARD 60573 SANDRA F WERTS 60574 WEST WELD 60575 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00 60578 ROBERTA WICK 60577 THE WORK CONNECTION 60578 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 59966 VOID OUT CHECK 59975 VOID OUT CHECK 60097 VOID OUT CHECK 60125 VOID OUT CHECK '187 VOID OUT CHECK 932659' ; JUNE 19.1990 -UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT/BUILDING INSPECTIONS 52.15 DEPT UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 1055.20 BRASS FITTINGS-STREET DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 277.31 GAS CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 57.38 CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 1862.50 -GEARS/RINGSACCORS/WASHERS/LUBRICANTS/ 6529.75 -SCREWS/NUT & BOLTS/GASKETS/SEALS/TUBING/ -PUMP DIAPHRAGMS/VALVES/BELTS/FUSES/SEATS/ LUBRICANTS FOR CHEMICAL FEEDER,-WATER DEPT REPLACE DAMAGED EYEGLASS LENSES-SEWER DEPT 78.00t -CHEMICALS/STORAGE TANK/PUMP REGULATORS/ 2447.70' METERS-COMMUNITY CENTER TV INSPECTION-SEWER DEPT 630.00 LIGHT BULBS-COMMUNITY CNETE 217.69 REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 41.85 MILEAGE-RECREATION SUPERVISOR 98.78 -BAND SAWBLADES/FACE SHIELDS/GRINDING 320.51 WHEEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARTS FOR RAPID MIXER-WATER DEPT 572.73 MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL .150-08.1 SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE 288.00 -1ST AID SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/CITY HALL/ 156.90 COMUNITY CENTER 131.75- 4924.50- 75.53- 29.13- 348.95- $1556925.92 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEST 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 33 UTILITY BOND FUND ! 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FO 57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST -FD 73 WATER FUND ' 77 SEWER FUND 79 RALF 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 85 HISTORICAL CULTURAL FD 87 CISG FUND 88 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE $1556925.92 331476.82 186522.11 93882.59 67103.56 683681.75 1570.50 102297.06 ' 1898.64 78733.35 4880.98 30.00 3764.08 92.80 875.00 518.90 PETTIION TO: THE crry OF EDEN PRAIRIE FROM EDEN PRAIRIE CITIZENS EFFECTED BY WESTERN, NORTH LAKE RILEY. RESIDENTIAL SEGMENT FOR Tii 212 ISSUE #1 The City of Eden Prairie has endorsed Western North Lake Riley, Residential segment known as Alternative 2; as the preferred alignment for TH 212 through Eden Prairie. The status of the neighborhood along Altematiii 2 has changed significantly since approval. We request a public hearing for reconsideration of Western, North:: Lake Riley. Mitchell Lake segment known as Alternative 5 as the preferred alignment for TH 212 through , Eden Prairie. , . • Concerns: Public hearings were conducted in 1986. City Council's approval based on outdated land usage in effected area. The effected area has experienced significant growth since 1987. Devastating impact will occur to wetlands and wildlife habitat in effected area. Wetland and habitat impact is greater through effect area than Alternative 5. Outdated EIS by MNDOT. Data collected summer of 1988. Significant noise and pollution impact on children attending the Central Middle School. Devastating economic impact on effected area. MNPAC standards for night time noise levels are not met, and are unacceptable to citizens in effected area. Current noise levels along Alternative 5 would be significantly abated by TH 212. ,qq ir AVE *2 The City Council of Eden Prairie endorses the Eden Prairie News as their vehicle of communicaUon with the citizens of Eden Prairie. The reliability of the Eden Prairie News is variable and too large a format. We request that the City Council of Eden Prairie review the need for better communication of City matters with the citinqn of Eden Prairie. - Concerns: Availability of Information to incoming residence on TH 212 was inadequate or lacking. Eden Prairie News cannot deliver tirnPly information to all citizens due to rapid growth of the City. The Eden Prairie News format is too large. There is no summary source of City Council meetings available. NtI9 iAME ADDRESS WiC4911 ts6ei 823i illeo) If) PHONE * 0/34-66cg- Act v /c4o? 4404,4. e it4C 53y cosq 55.55 Cet.u...em 124.4), / calk rh,' cc-? J-. NEN t 0 , 6P. 11,1/7o/1 r C5e.Te CAl`fav ciLt - ta-f ,419-A 9 C Ods# PETITION TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REQUESTING A PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING EDEN PRAIRIE CITIZENS ENDORSE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SSUEs: '1 We request a public hearing for reconsideration of Western, North Lake Riley, Mitchell Lake sgment known as Alternative 5 as the prefered alignment for TH 212 through Eden Prairie. '2 The City Council of Eden Prairie review the need for better communication of City matters with lie citizens of Eden Prairie. Auic ils41 be 1)4c1 S-60; //r/L) PETITION TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REQUESTING A PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING EDEN PRAIRIE CITIZENS ENDORSE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUEs: 11 We request a public hearing for reconsideration of Western, North Lake Riley, Mitchell Lake segment known as Alternative 5 as the prefered alignment for TH 212 through Eden Prairie. '2 The City Council of Eden Prairie review the need for better communication of City matters with the citizens of Eden Prairie. NAME Eva -lehtt 3C/1 ADDRESS PHONE SIGNATURE Icy ). D je (4 s v. 3,1-416S z "I'114-mq,-, Is-Hy U I la c,t_ kx,c04% qW -Lkos-t_ Al Tok-\0e5yAtal 011 16 y tAasa, 937 ;2 M c Rr OrC.A. 15 ( 0 3 (10 & ba 937-9(t3 L hikukti/J 154 5 L 9314 _gt 8 ,t 3 cY SI, I flAA,N 3‘/- 5 57, 15 (0 ci :110..1.( L( gni 41- Li, k Bf CC 934/-, 1510 9 I kid ttivetii c It fit (1 0 90 In 937-96cry ci 7--7), IV II 9 3f-las-C- g--36'4 I I Lath- 4. 9j4- 55 l,a--- Via() LCLi( 9 -31:71-e 99 1:7:)? tCh:CL7Th 0 irf4r.vn K71 oi.L) /V CEIALt.); • Ls, cri stlo I Ea t ag,/ Ns S.4 /16v LA 01,-(b• Ti t'(V ) ),"" A PETITION TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REQUESTING A PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING EDEN PRAIRIE CITIZENS ENDORSE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE '1 We request a public hearing for reconsideration of Western, North Lake Riley, Mitchell Lake ;egment known as Alternative 5 as the pie! erect alignment for TN 212 through Eden Prairie. '2 The City Council of Eden Prairie review the need for better communication of City matters with the citizens of Eden Prairie. IAME , _ADDRESS gL;410 PHONE • SIGNA 919- c tart P\ 4-, 1 „ .4i:4-1C , A ) PETITION TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE REQUESTING A PUBLIC HEARING THE FOLLOWING EDEN PRAIRIE CITIZENS ENDORSE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE '1 We request a public hearing for reconsideration of Western, North Lake Riley, Mitchell Lake >egment known as Alternative 5 as the prefered alignment for TH 2 12 through Eden Prairie. '2 The City Council of Eden Prairie review the need for better communication of City matters with lie citizens of Eden Prairie. NAME ADDRESS %.1c1,3(.7,•-q- S'eel-Ui C4L4-D.\tk/r. 4%0 my\ )-(isS/P..n• ,c,"" Li '7 PHONE ' 9'3 - 5)S9 ( 41,1:4--7Alket.,-, 4P,4-1444 _ tERp i H1 L ./.1( 14,4 1A.:40s 1,../.0eg°6-7eg 9 (71 -s 1 •10 „.°) r z7 - 7 (134- i,r).-Aotel t t n Lt. L I ifH -A71,-)t c•ri v/7 - MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Waste Management Commission SUBJECT: Status of Packaging Ordinance DATE: - June 6, 1990 The 1990 Legislature took no action regarding the ability of cities to enact ordinances regulating product packaging in food establishgents. Consequently, cities may adopt and begin to enforce such ordinahces on July 1, 1990. Although thi —City Council has approved the first reading of a packaging ordinance, the Waste Management Commission recommends that the Council continue-to delay action on the second reading. The Minneapolis/St. Paul Advisory Committee established to implement the ordinances-has completed its work. It has recommended that enforcement not begin until January 1, 1990. The recommendations call for phasing in the myriad of packaging materials over a number of years. Minneapolis is conducting three pilot projects for curbside collection of different types of recyclable plastics. Minneapolis says that markets must be demonstrated to exist in order for parts of its ordinance to take effect. Inasmuch as Eden Prairie will be looking to Minneapolis as a model for enforcement, it makes sense for the City to see that the ordinance is functioning smoothly. In 1989, the Governor established a Select Committee on Packaging and the Environment (SCOPE). Cities represented on this committee have agreed not to adopt and/or enforce packaging ordinances until the SCOPE report is completed (probably this fall). Recommendations in the report may be enacted in legislation in 1991 and effectively preclude the need for local regulation. With a statewide trend toward more responsible packaging, the City may not need to take action. Still unresolved is the matter of enforcement of the ordinance in Eden Prairie. Hennepin County inspects food establishments in Eden Prairie; it has not decided how or whether it would enforce a City regulation more stringent than the level of inspection provided by the County. It may be that the City would bear an additional cost for enforcement, paid either to the County or to an additional staff position. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council delay action on the second reading of the proposed packaging ordinance. The Commission will be pleased to inform the Council when additional action is appropriate. CWD:jdp Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. 7525 /Telenet' road • suite 109 • eden prairie. minnesota 55344 • 1612) 937-8942 Mr. John Frane Finance Director . City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive", Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: June 1, 1990-1991 Property/Casualty Insurance Renewal Dear John: Following is the information the City Council requested regarding premiums for the excess liability coverage and survey of other cities who do or don't secure excess coverage. Limit $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 Excess Liability Coverage Waive Tort $ 84,870 127,305 148,523 159,131 164,436 Non-Waiver Tort $ 69,000 103,500 120,750 129,375 133,688 City Survey North Star Risk Services, administrator of the LMCIT plan, advises us that there are approximately 720 of 854 cities in Minnesota who participate in the LMCIT plan. Of that number, approximately one quarter purchase excess liability limits of one million dollars. They were not immediately aware of any who purchased higher limits. Of the surrounding metropolitan cities, we can advise you of the following: Excess Limits None None $1,003,000 1,000,000 , 6,000,000 1,000,000 Primary Limits $ 600,000 600,000 600,000 1,000,000 600,000 City Brooklyn Park Bloomington 4151*PA* FBUriiSOlie _APP14 Valley Coon Rapids With regard to the renewal, please remember that you must sign the participation '.form and the retrospective rating form for the workers' compensation coverage. These forms should be sent to Employee Benefit Administration. You must also sign the excess liability form indicating the non-waiver of the tort limits.' This must be sent to North Star Risk Services. Please send us a copy of these forms once ttley are signed for our records. , If you have any further questions, please let me know. Sincerely, CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS, INC. BGC/jb iian G. Colway Assistant Vice President Mr. John Frane May 21, 1990 Page 2 r