HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 10/20/1992•
•
•
--------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: THE COUNCIL WILL MEET AT 6:00 PM FOR THE PURPOSE OF
INTERVIEWING CANDIDATES FOR THE FOLWWlNG: 1) TO FILL
ONE VACANCY ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICFS COMMISSION,
2) FOUR MEMBERS TO BE APPOINTED TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS
COMMTI'TEE, 3) FOUR MEMBERS TO THE HUMAN SERVICFS
COMMITTEE, AND 4) APPOINTMENT OF YOUTH/STUDENT
REPRESENTATIVES TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
APPOINTMENTS WILL BE MADE AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING FOLWWlNG THESE INTERVIEWS.
--------------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1992
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean
Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City
Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger
Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of
Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert,
and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
n. MINUTES
A.
B.
Joint City CounciVParks, Recreation & Natural Resources
Commission Meeting held Tuesday. October 6, 1992
City Council Meeting held Tuesday, October 6, 1992
m. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
Page 2195
Page 2197
Paqe 2205
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, October 20, 1992
Page Two
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
General Fund Budget Status Report
Adjustment to Contract with Sterling Group. Inc. for City Hall
Acquisition Services ~:~ .
Authorize Clean Water Partnership Grant Application and
Designating Project Representative (Resolution No. 92-227)
Final Plat Approval of Hidden Glen 5th Addition Oocated at
the N.W. Comer of Barrington Drive and Dell Road
(Resolution No. 92-231)
Final Plat Approval of Eden Lake Townhomes Oocated south
of Medcom Boulevard) (Resolution No. 92-232)
Approve Change Order No. 1 for Creek Knolls. Bluffs East
12th Addition and Valley View Road Sidewalk. I.C. 52-194. 52-
256. and 52-242)
Authorize Permit Application! Agreement for Pedestrian Bridge
over Twin Cities and Western Railroad at CSAH 4
VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH by Victory Lutheran Church.
2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 9-92, Zoning District Change from
RI-22 to Public on 6.6 acres and Zoning District Amendment
within the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Victory Lutheran Church; Adoption of Resolution
No. 92-210, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 9-92 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of
Resolution No. 92-212, Approving Site Plan for Victory Lutheran
Church. Location: East of Eden Prairie Road, west of Red Oak
Drive and north of Berge.n Drive. (Ordinance No. 9-92 -Zoning
District Change from RI-22 to Public and Zoning District
Amendment within the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres; Resolution
No. 92-210 -Authorizing Summary and Publication; and
Resolution No. 92-212 -Site Plan Review)
EDEN LAKE TOWNHOMES by Eden Lake· Townhomes
Partnership. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 22-92, Rezoning from
Rural to RM-6.5 on 8.7 acres; Approval of Developer's
Agreement for Eden Lake Townhomes; Adoption of Resolution
No. 92-191, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 22-92 and
Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of
Resolution No. 92-192, Approving Site Plan for Eden Lake
Townhomes. Location: South of Medcom Boulevard, East of the
Eden Prairie Medical Building (Ordinance No. 22-92 -Rezoning
to RM-6.5; Resolution No. 92-191 -Authorizing Summary and
Publication; Resolution No. 92-192 -Site Plan Review)
Page 2206
Page 21
Page 2219
Page 2220
Page 2222
Page 2225
Page 2226
Page 2238
•
•
•
•
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, October 20, 1992
Page Three
K. Approval of Amendments to Kinder-Care Project Revenue
Bond Documents
L. Change Order No. 3 for Community Center Addition
M. Recommendation to Accept PrQPosal to Sponsor Ice Arena
Scoreboard
N. 2nd Readings of Ordinance No. 41-92 and Ordinance No. 42-
92. Relating to Compensation for Mayor and City
Councilmembers. and Resolution No. 92-234. Authorizine
Summary for Publication
O. Resolution No. 92-235. Authorizing Summary for Publication
of Ordinance No. 38-92 Relatine to Name Change from
Historical & Cultural Commission to Cultural Commission
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS
A.
B.
Special Assessment Hearine (Resolution No. 92-233)
FAIRFIELD SOUTH by Centex Real Estate Corp. Request for
Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 16.2 acres and
from Rural to RI-9.5 on 26.6 acres and Preliminary Plat of 49.9
acres into 94 lots, 4 outlots and road right-of-way. Location:
North of County Road 1, west of Braxton Drive. (Ordinance No.
40-92 -Rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.S; and Resolution No.
92-230 -Preliminary Plat)
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VU. PETITIONS. REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Reguest for Land Alteration Permit from Williams Brothers
Pipeline to Perform Tree Clearin& within the Pipeline Easement
at Riley Creek/Pioneer Trail. and at the Minnesota River south
of Riverview Drive
Vill. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS &
COMMITTEES
:)
f} Page 2246
Page 2249
Page ,2251
Page 2253
Page 2259
Page 2261
Page 2266
Page 2297
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, October 20, 1992
Page Four
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Annointment of 1 member to the Board of Anpeals &
Adjustments to fill an unexpired tenn to 2/28/94
(Continued from October 6, 1992)
B. Anpointment to fill vacancy on the Human Ri&hts & Services
Commission for a tenn to expire 2/28/95 .
C. AlU)ointment of four (4) members to the Human Ri&hts
Committee
D. Anpointment of four (4) members to the Human Services
Committee
E. Anpointment of Youth/Student Representatives to Boards and
Commissions
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. Reports of CounciImembers
B. Renort of City Mana&er
C. Renort of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource
D. Rej.)ort of Director of Plannin&
E. Renort of Director of Public Works
F. Report of City Attorney
G. Renort of Finance Director
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
•
•
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND • PARKS. RECREATION. AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1992 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
COUNCllMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin
Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Pat Richard, Chairperson; Bruce Bowman, Clair Hilgeman, Joan
Kube-Harderwijk, David Kracum, Diane Popovich Lynch, Del
Vanderploeg
CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig
Dawson; Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural
Resources; Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect; Laurie
Helling, Manager of Recreation Services; Stuart A. Fox, Manager
of Parks and Natural Resources
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
&ayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. All members were present.
•
I. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Priority Acquisition of Conservancy Areas -Study of Minnesota River Bluff and Creek
Valleys. "Bit: Woods"
B.
Commissioners discussed the importance of preparing an inventory of the remaining sites in the
City, like the "Big Woods" at the north end of Mitchell Lake. It was suggested that the City
hire a consultant to prepare the inventory and assess the value of such resources in the City.
With on such information, an addendum to the City's Comprehensive Plan could be prepared,
enabling the City to better plan its land uses and prioritize its expenditures in the future.
Council members concurred that an inventory was an appropriate first step. Concern was
expressed about the cost of a consultant for this purpose.
Role of the Parks. Recreation. and Natural Resources Commission in the Development
Review Process
With the "Big Woods" near Mitchell Lake as an example, Commissioners explained the
difficulty in being amongst the last to review any development project. They believed that the
"Big Woods" issue may not have been as difficult on all the parties involved, if it was known
in advance that there was a unique natural resource involved.
/1 ! L)~ ,:J\/I v
Joint Meeting of City Council
and Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission
2 October~, 1992
i • , ,1
Councilmembers agreed that the input of the Commission was valued highly atili that the
Commission was depended upon for detailed review of the park and natural resource issues of
any land development. Councilmembers believed that an inventory of these resources would be
helpful in avoiding problem situations in future development review.
With respect to the park and trail facilities, Council members expressed confidence in the
Commission's work on behalf of the community and recommended that they continue the same
process with development review in these areas.
C. Purlmtory Creek Recreation Area Land Acguisition
Commissioners discussed their desire to act on the land acquisitions in the Purgatory Creek
Recreation Area. After further discussion with the Council, it was determined that additional
steps would be taken to approach land owners in the area again and to begin an appraisal process
for the lands involved.
D. Swimmine Pool Needs
Commissioners explained that they perceived the need for an additional public pool in the
community for use by families and for organized athletic events. Alternatives were discuss~
including approaching the clubs in the City about leasing their pools, remodeling the existin"P"
pool, adding a pool in another location in the City, approaching another city about a joint
venture for another pool to be used by both cities, approaching an entrepreneur about a
partnership venture for another pool, and adding a pool to a future referendum ballot.
Councilmembers agreed that a pool was needed in the community; however, with funds
becoming more scarce, it was a need which should be prioritized with the rest of the needs in
the City.
It was pointed out that questions about another pool were part of the recent community survey
of the citizens. Council members suggested that it would be appropriate to revisit this issue at
such time as the results of the survey were known.
ll.AD.TOURNMENT
Mayor Tenpas adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m.
•
• TUESDAY,OCTOBER6,1~2
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7600 Executive Drive
Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin
Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig
Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D.
Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of
Public Works Gene Dietz
Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. All members were present.
PRESENTATION OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES' INNOVATIVE
CITY AWARD TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BY MICHELLE VEITH, CHAIR OF THE A.R.L.E •
• COOPERATIVE
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Jullie added items X.B,l, Amendment to Purchase A2reement for Ternan Property: X.D.2. Consultant
Study for Inventory of Natural Resources Sites; and, X.D.3.. Authorization to Proceed with
Appraisals for Acquisition of Property in Downtown Area.
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried
unanimously.
II. MINUTES
A. City Council Meetin2 held Tuesday. September 15. 1992
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting
of September 15, 1992, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
m. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Clerk's License List
• B. Resolution No. 92-196. Approvin2 Election .Jud2es for the November 3 General Election
C. Proclamation for Disability Awareness Month
City Council Minutes 2 October 6, 1992
D.ML~~~~~~mm~~~~~~~~~~Jm~~~~bm
Commission. Chana:ina: the Name of the Commission to the Cultural Commission
E. Award Bid for Construction of Starina: Lake Amphitheater Storaa:e Buildina:
F. Approve Proposed Ice Schedule for New Ice Rink
G. Foxjet Request for Additional Pool Hours
H. Approve Request for Candlewood Crossina: at Hennepin County Rea:ional Rail Corridor
(Resolution No. 92-221)
I. Approve Addition to Scope of 1992 Drainaa:e Study. I.C. 52-269
J. Receive Bids and Award Contract for Lime Sluda:e Removal. I.C. 52-271 (Resolution No. 92-222)
K. Final Plat Approval of Bluffs East 10th Addition Oocated east of County Road 18 and south of
Bluff Road) Resolution No. 92-223
L. Final Plat Approval of Bluffs East 13th Addition Oocated at the southwest quadrant of Franlo
Road and Fawns Way) Resolution No. 92-224
N. Declarina: Costs to be Assessed and Orderina: Preparation of 1992 Special Assessment Rolls and
Settina: Hearina: Date for November 3. 1992 (Resolution No. 92-226)
O. CASCADE TOWNHOMES by Sunset Homes Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 30-92-
PUD-7-92, Zoning District Amendment within the existing RM-6.5 Zoning District; Approval of
Developer's Agreement for Cascade Townhomes; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-214, Authorizing
Summary of Ordinance No. 30-92-PUD-7-92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption
of Resolution No. 92-215, Approving Site Plan for Cascade Townhomes. Location: Dell Road and
Cascade Drive (Ordinance No. 30-92-PUD-7-92 -PUD District Review and Zoning District
Amendment within the existing RM-6.5 Zoning District; Resolution No. 92-214 -Authorizing
Summary and Publication; and Resolution No. 92-215 -Site Plan Review.)
P. FAIRFIELD WEST by Centex Homes. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 29-92, Rezoning from Rural
to RI-13.5 on 16.6 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Fairfield West; Adoption of
Resolution No. 92-176, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 29-92 and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. Location: West of Fairfield, south of Scenic Heights Road #212. (Ordinance No. 29-92 -
Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5; and Resolution No. 92-176 -Authorizing Summary and
Publication)
Q. BLUFFS EAST 13TH ADDITION by Hustad Development Corporation. 2nd Reading of ordinan.
No. 35-92, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on .30 acres and Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 2.06
acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Bluffs East 13th Addition; Adoption of Resolution No.
t) 10-"1 !f.1 J(.
City Council Minutes 3 October 6, 1992
•
•
•
.>~
K--
92-213, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 35-92 and Ordering Publication of Said-Summary.
Location: North of Franlo Road, west of County Road 18. (Ordinance No. 35-92 -Rezo~ from
Rural to RM-6.5 on .30 acres and Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 2.06 acres; and Resolution
No. 92-213 -Authorizing Summary and Publication)
R. BRAXTON POND by Westar Properties, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 32-91, Rezoning from
Rural to RI-13.5 on 3.6 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Braxton Pond; Adoption of
Resolution No. 92-216, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 32-91, and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary. Location: South and west of the terminus of existing Braxton Drive. (Ordinance No. 32-91
-Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 3.6 acres; and Resolution No. 92-216 -Authorizing Summary
and Publication)
S. LEIGHTON'S GARAGE by Hoyt Development Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 34-92,
Zoning District Amendment within the 1-2 Park Zoning District; Approval of Developer's Agreement
for Leighton's Garage; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-217, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 34-
92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-218, Approving Site
Plan for Leighton'S Garage. Location: South of County Road #67, north and east of Nine Mile Creek.
(Ordinance No. 34-92 -Zoning District Amendment within the 1-2 Park Zoning District on 1.89
acres; Resolution No. 92-217 -Authorizing Summary and Publication; and Resolution No. 92-218 -
Site Plan Review)
T. WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE -EOUIPMENT BUILDING <BFD by Rutledge Construction
Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 36-92, Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park on 1.85 acres;
Approval of Developer's Agreement for Woodlake Sanitary Service -Equipment Building; Adoption of
Resolution No. 92-219, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 36-92 and Ordering Publication of Said
Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-220, Approving Site Plan for Woodlake Sanitary Service-
Equipment Building. Location: 9813 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance No. 36-92 -Rezoning from
Rural to 1-2 Park on 1.85 acres; Resolution No. 92-219 -Authorizing Summary and Publication;
and Resolution No. 92-220 -Site Plan Review.)
u. Resolution No. 92-228. Givine Host Approval to the Issuance of Health Care Revenue Bonds. Series
1992 (Group Health Plan. Inc. Project>
V. Approve Plans and Specifications for Georee Moran Drive Improvements. I.C. 52-282 (Resolution
No. 92-229)
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve Items A. -V. of the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS
V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Harris, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voting
"aye. "
'!!ClO.
+/\ r , 1
City Council Minutes 4
VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VIT. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
October .6, 1992
.,,~:
~~ •
A. Request by Crai& and Susan Edwards for Review of Variance 92-26 Not Annroved by the Board
of Adjustments and Angeals. The Variance is to Allow a Deck to be Constructed 23 Feet from a
Front Progerty Line
Craig and Susan Edwards, 18625 Jacques Court, explained their request for a variance to encroach seven
(7) feet into the front yard setback of 30 ft. in order to build a deck in one of the front yards of their
corner lot.
Enger explained that Staff and the Board of Appeals would benefit from a discussion by the Council as
to when such variances seemed appropriate and when they did not. He suggested that, based on such
a discussion, it may be apparent that a code amendment should be initiated for these situations.
After discussion of the Edwards' request, Councilmembers concurred that a review of the ordinance was
in order and that this would likely save time for citizens, the Council, the Board, and Staff.
Councilmembers acknowledged that the design of the Edwards house seemed to imply a deck should be
built due to the placement of an outer door at an elevation so high above ground. To avoid situations
like this in the future, Council directed that the Building Inspections Department review house plans fie
these types of design features in order to avoid problems where possible.
MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to grant the variance 92-06 for Craig and Susan Edwards
for a front yard setback variance at 18625 Jacques Court for construction of a deck to allow a 23 ft. front
yard setback. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Review Revised Layout Plan for Anderson Lakes Parkway (west of CSAH 18) and Hennenin Parks
Pronosed Tree Loss Mitieation Plan
Dietz explained the revised layout plan for Anderson Lakes Parkway which was discussed at a
neighborhood meeting on October 1 st. The purpose of the meeting was to update the area residents
about the progress of design and construction of the road.
Dietz reviewed the reforestation plans for trees that would be lost by construction of the road, noting that
the County would exceed the minimum requirements of the City'S Tree Ordinance in terms of tree
replacement. Traffic volumes for the road were also discussed. Dietz noted that final plans would be
available in Summer, 1993.
Anderson said he had received a complaint from a citizen that the notification area was too small and
asked about the procedures for notification. Dietz explained that even though all public hearings had
been completed on the project, City Staff called the meeting as a courtesy to those impacted, notifying
everyone with 400 ft.
Council members discussed several aspects of the proposed plans, including the policy of the City tit
reconstruct roads to handle future traffic volumes, not current traffic volumes; the location of the
entrance to the nature center; interim parking for the nature center; connections to adjacent parks in
City Council Minutes 5 October 6, 1992
• Bloomington; the locations Hennepin County intended to plant replacement trees; the need for
coordination with the Regional Transit Board and Southwest Metro Transit;~_ and the impact on the
•
entrance to the Preserve Village Shopping Center. -,
Kevin Fox, 10560 Lake Fall Drive, presented the Council with a petition requesting a halt to the review
process without further public meetings. He added four points of concern including: 1) the four-lane
design seemed to be based on the availability of funds, not based on need; 2) the impact of any decisions
on a four-lane design would directly and adversely affect all of Anderson Lakes Parkway and the
adjacent neighborhoods; 3) the four-lane design would alter the fundamental character of the area,
especially the wooded area north of existing Anderson Lakes Parkway; and 4) part of the design
philosophy for the road should include the value of the environment that exists and the impact a four-
lane design would have on that environment.
Norbert McCrady, 10520 Lake Fall Drive, asked for additional information about the plans for the road
and for the Council's representation of the neighborhood's concerns in the process as plans became more
finalized.
After further discussion, Councilmembers directed that a public meeting be held, potentially at the
second Council meeting in November, to provide full information to all parties. Council members asked
that additional information also be made available regarding connections to the surrounding park areas,
alternative plans indicating impacts on nearby roads if Anderson Lakes Parkway was not rebuilt as a
four-lane road, and more complete information regarding the location of land swaps planned between
the Hennepin Park System and the Hennepin County Transportation.
Vill. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES
IX. APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment of 1 member to the Board of Appeals & Adjustments to fill an unexpired term to
2/28/94 (Continued to October 20, 1992)
X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. Reports of Councilmembers
1. Compensation for City Council (Continued from September 15, 1992).
The Council discussed its compensation compared to other similar communities, as well as the fact
that compensation had not been adjusted for many years. There had been no changes made for
inflation, nor had consideration been given to the fact that the population had more than doubled
during that time, thereby requiring more activity on the part of every Council member.
• Councilmembers concurred that the per diem portion of compensation was the most difficult part of
the issue as the distribution of per diem seemed unbalanced. It was acknowledged that from time to
time special situations would arise, such as the landfill closure meetings, or other such special
projects, when greater demands were placed on an individual member's time. All agreed that there
should be clear definition of per diem for activities performed on behalf of the City.
City Council Minutes 6 October 6, 1992
MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt 1st reading of Ordinance No.!9-92 •
prepared by Staff. Motion failed on a 2-3-0 vote, with Jessen, Pidcock, and TenlJas voting
~~. v
During continued discussion, Council members expressed uneasiness about adjusting their own
compensation.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt 1st reading of Ordinance No. 39-92,
maintaining the current levels of salary and per diem compensation, without a cap on per diem, and
adding explicitly defined criteria for per diem as recommended by City Staff, including a provision
for special circumstances requiring unusual time commitment by a councilmember as requested by
Council. Motion carried on a 4-1-0 vote, with Anderson voting aga~.
B. Report of City Mana&er
1. Amendment to Purchase A&reement for Ternan Property
Pauly and Jullie explained the details of the Amendment to Purchase Agreement involving changes
to the purchase agreement dated July 10, 1992, between John K. and Jean M. Ternan and the City,
copies of which had been presented to the Council.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to authorize Staff to continue to pursue negotiati.
for purchase and closing of the Ternan property, provided, however, that if the Temans fail to exec
and deliver the proposed Amendment to Purchase Agreement amending that certain Purchase
Agreement made as of July 10, 1992 between John K. and Jean M. Ternan and the City, or to close
the purchase of their property by the City, the City Attorney is authorized to initiate condemnation
proceedings for the property. Motion carried on a 4-1-0 vote, with Tenpas voting aga~.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the amendment to the purchase
agreement for the Ternan property. Motion carried on a 4-1-0 vote, with Tenpas voting aga~.
C. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource
1. Starin& Lake Outlet/Pur&atory Creek Recreation Area Feasibility Study
Lambert explained the Feasibility Study for the improvements for the Staring Lake outlet and
Purgatory Creek Recreation Area prepared by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District.
The District would be holding its public hearing for ordering these improvements on October 27th
at which time Council's position was requested.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, that the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed
District be informed that Eden Prairie supports the Feasibility Study with a preference for the
improvements included under Option #1. Motion carried unanimously. •
City Council Minutes 7 October 6, 1992
•
•
•
2. Consultant Study for Inventory of Natural Resources Sites
Based on discussions during a joint meeting with the Parks, Recreation, and' Naturar~esources
Commission, and as a result of the discussions and meetings over recent months regarding the "Big
Woods" near Mitchell Lake, Staff recommended that consultants be contacted regarding the potential
cost for preparation of an inventory of unique natural resources in the City. Council authorized Staff
to obtain cost estimates for such a study and report back to Council. Lambert noted that funds to pay
for such a study were available through Cash Park Fees.
3. Authorization to Proceed with Appraisals for ACQuisition of Property in Downtown Area.
MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to authorize Staff to obtain appraisals for trails and
easements in the Downtown area and to contact the property owners involved regarding selling or
gifting those parcels to City. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Report of Director of Plannine
E. Report of Director of Public Works
1. Erosion Control Policy (Continued from September 15, 1992)
Gray explained the details of the proposed Erosion Control Policy, noting that it would involve both
Engineering and Building Departments and would apply to all projects with risk of erosion. The
proposed policy required frequent inspection and maintenance, cleanup of public and private property
and empowered Staff to correct problems when the permittee failed to do so. Key timelines for
correction of problems were also established in the policy.
During discussion, Councilmembers recommended the inclusion of additional strict conditions
regarding the clean up of lakeshore and stream areas and recommended that trails and sidewalks also
be included in the required clean up whenever erosion occurred.
A question was raised regarding the role of the watershed district in this process. Dietz explained that
the District had been contacted and appeared interested in the policy, but had not formally responded.
Councilmembers concurred that policy covered many of their concerns and appeared to be a good first
step toward management of erosion problems and water quality in the City. Council suggested that
Staff report to the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission on a regular basis regarding
the results of the enactment of the policy on water qUality.
F. Report of City Attorney
G. Report of Finance Director
1. l&ase for Liquor Store No.1 (Continued to November 17, 1992, meeting)
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
City Council Minutes 8 October 6, 1992
A. Future A&enda Items • Council members requested information at future meetings regarding progress on the new City Hall
and on restoration of the Purgatory Creek Area.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Jessen, seconded by Harris. Mayor Tenpas adjourned the
meeting at 10:25 p.m.
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST
October 2~, 1992
CONTRACTOR (t.1UL TI-FAMIL Y & cmm.)
Terry Adams, Inc.
Antco Construction Company, Inc.
Arch itects Pl us, Inc.
Boomtown, Inc.
T.J.Olson, Inc.
T J U Construction, Inc .
Rosewood Construction Services Corp.
PLUMBING
All-American ~echanical, Inc.
J. Baars Plumbing & Heating
Commers Conditioned Water Co.
\~ATER SOFTENER
Commers Conditioned Water Co.
GAS FITTER 3. 2 BEE~ I)N SALE
LeVahn Br~thers, Inc. Twin Panda
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for
the licensed activity.
I]J JEiJ
Pa t Sol ie
Licensing
21..0;
..
.' • ."'.:~;'(
"J}
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT
For Year-to-Date Ending August 31, 1992
•
•
M E M 0 RAN DUM
To: Carl Jullie, City Manager
Through: John Frane, Finance Director
Craig Dawson, Assistant city Manager
From: Sara Ruth, Accountant
Date: 10/7/92
Subject: August 1992 Budget Status Report
'. -:'-
' .....
,l
Attached please find the General Fund budget status report for
year-to-date ending August 31, 1992.
The 1992 budget as originally adopted projected a year-end
unreserved fund balance of $2,235,200. After incorporating
adjustments requested and approved so far this year, and those
adjustments resulting from a close review of previous and current
year activity to originally adopted budgets during the 1993 budget
development process, year-end unreserved fund balance is now
projected at $2,459,900.
•
Estimated revenue for 1992 has declined in several areas, including
increased tax rebates and loss of HACA. The $224,700 increase in
projected year-end fund balance is primarily due to an unexpected •
special assessment revenue "windfall" to be realized upon closing
on the Ternan property.
The 1992 expenditure budget originally adopted for 1992 has been
increased by the amount encumbered from 1991. Several other
expenditure adjustments were made to reflect actions approved by
the city manager and council, staffing changes, and to provide more
accurate estimates based on mid-year data. These other adjustments
resulted in a slight decline in originally estimated expenditures .
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT
FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING:
August 31, 1992
•• REVENUES·· " , • 1991 1992 1992 "-
ADOPTED 1991 8/31/91 % ADOPTED REVISED 8/31/9i %
BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL RECEIVED BUDGET BUDGET ACfUAL RECEIVED
GENERAL FUND: -. ,-....
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES. 10,386,400 10,139,100 5;266,664 51.94% 10,402,400 10,198,600 5,319,445
INTERGOVERNMENTL REV ::208,000 -245,200 202,481 82.58% 261,800 289,000 225,013
LICENSES 131,300 151,400 30,155 20.31% 130,000 130,000 8,349
BUILDING PERMITS 1,050,000 902,500 641,149 11.71% 1,000,000 1,000,000 188,970
OTHER PERMITS & FEES 608,000 587,000 381,039 64.91% 665,000 600,200 387,967
RECREATION FEES 786,300 747,900 560,724 74.97% 837,000 818,800 563,325
COURT FINES 250,000 181,800 107,407 59.08% 175,000 210,000 140,578
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 110,000 236,000 100,000 42.37% 150,000 200,000 133,333
TRANSFERS IN 385,000 437,400 256,667 58.68% 596,200 609,800 406,533
OTHER REVENUE 542,000 600,900 275,908 45.92% 442,000 793,800 267,138
SUB-TOTAL 14,457,000 14,229,200 7,828,800 55.02% 14,659,400 14,850,200 8,240,651
FUND BALANCE 675,000 511,700 0.00% 1,137,600 974,300
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 15,132,000 14,140,900 1,828,800 53.11% 15,191,000 15,824,500 8,240,651
EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FUND:
CERTIFICATE PROCEEDS 357,500 1,900,000 19,000 1.00% 593,400 593,400
OTHER REVENUE 24,500 12,131 49.51% 7,000 9,650
TRANSFERS IN 12,700 0.00% 4,000
FUND BALANCE 98,800
• TOTAL EQUIP ACQ FUND 351,500 1,931,200 31,131 1.61% 593,400 103,200 9,650
GRAND TOTAL 15,489,500 16,640,900 1,841,800 50.61% 16,390,400 16,521,100 8,250,301
Notes:
* Property Tax and Intergovernmental revenues are normally collected in July & December.
* The bulk of Licensing activity occurs during the 4th quarter, 1991 activity reflects the opening of
a new liquor establishment, 1992 activity reflects one establish ment closing and a partial refund of its 92 license fee.
* The 1992 revised budget for Other Revenues includes $247,600 in prepaid assessments on the Ternan property.
52.16%
11.86%
6.42%
78.90%
64.64%
68.80%
66.94%
66.67%
66.67%
33.65%
55.49%
0.00%
5208%
0.00%
137.86%
0.00%
0.00%
1.31%
49.92%
* During 1991 the softball league fee dedicated for softball field improvements was collected in the general fund, then transferred
to the park imp fund at year-end. This fee is being coded directly to the park imp fund beginning in 1992 .
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT
FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING:
August 31, 1992
•• EXPENDITURES • •
-}
" %. 1991 1992 1992
ADOPTED 1991 8/31/91 % ADOPTEDREVISED 8/31/9l..
BUDGET ACTUAL ACfUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACfUAC EXPENDED
OPERATING EXPENSES: .' -... _.---. -.-' --. "
LEGISLATIVE 84,600 84,600 50,349 59.51% 86,600 87,400
ELECTIONS' 11,500 15,300 5,539 36.20% 80,500 93,300
CITY MANAGER. ' ., ,-,', ~ ---
. 'c •. 165,200 " 160,000 :106,333 66.46% 174,300 215,200
ASSESSING DEPT"·',' , : 329,100 309,100 206,660 66.86% 312,200 313,300
INSP/SAFETY/F ACILITIES
BLDG INSPECTION 529,600 504,400 339,556 67.32% 526,900 526,000
SAFETY 51,500 51,800 30,955 59.76% 58,200 59,500
FACILITIES 595,800 553,700 373,617 67.48% 612,800 642,100
PARKS/RECREATION
ADMIN & PARK PLAN 153,900 146,600 97,800 66.71% 171,700 166,140
PARK MAINTENANCE 751,000 730,500 476,085 65.17% 804,300 822,300
RECADMIN & SP EVENTS 164,400 175,800 123,138 70.04% 203,000 198,700
COMMUNITY CENTER 527,000 542,000 '--357,564 65.97% 563,600 570,100
BEACH 77,600 67,100 58,946 87.85% 68,500 67,400
ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 176,700 173,200 124,588 71.93% 178,700 178,900
RECREATION -YOUTH 208,100 195,400 146,049 74.74% 215,000 229,700
RECREATION -ADULT 77,600 87,000 55,325 63.59% 81,200 84,500
RECREATION -ADAPTIVE 15,200 24,200 15355 63.45% 46,000 48,000
mST & CUL AR TS 39,500 54,600 36,342 66.56% 45,600 45,600
FINANCE 258,600 259,700 172,410 66.39% 275,100 275,100
HUMAN RESOURCES 135,200 149,200 91,414 61.27% 144,300 147,700
COMMUNITY SERVICES 147,500 132,200 83,387 63.08% 149,300 148,100
PLANNING DEPT 371,600 357,000 242,527 67.93% 354,600 318,700
POLICE DEPT
POLICE 2,730,500 2,805,700 1,835,825 65.43% 2,887,800 2,919,700
CIVIL DEFENSE 12,800 11,900 10,630 89.33% 25,800 25,800
ANIMAL CONTROL 80,400 62,200 38,199 61.41% 78,200 78,200
FIRE 446,100 407,900 230,639 56.54% 473,900 439,560
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT
ENGINEERING 583,800 558,200 367,782 65.89% 641,400 634,200
STREETS & DRAINAGE 1,118,600 1,164,700 780,765 67.04% 1,163,400 1,183,300
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 584,700 557,300 361,542 64.87% 583,800 572,400
STREET LIGHTING 398,000 353,700 229,031 64.75% 381,500 381,500
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMT 35,000 37,200 15,153 40.73% 31,900 31,900
SHARED SERVICES
GENERAL 433,800 339,600 277,732 81.78% 429,800 408,300
DATA PROCESSING 91,000 91,900 62,843 68.38% 98,500 98,500
PUBLIC INFORMATION 91,900 95,000 57,919 60.97% 70,700 69,800
LEGAL COUNSEL 100,000 157,700 28,203 17.88% 105,000 135,000
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
& TRAINING 1,684,400 1,630,700
RESERVE
1,051,686 64.49% 1,853,500 1,753,500
CONTINGENCY 275,000 155,000 88,697 57.22% 157,000 99,400
TOTAL PERSONAL SVCS,
COMMODITIES, AND
CONTRACTED SVCS 13,537,200 13,202,100 8,630,585 65.37% 14,134,600 14,068,800
NOTES:
Spending level should be approximately 67% at August month -end.
Explanation of those divisions exceeding this level, or varying significantly from the previous year are as follows:
Elections -1992 actual expenditures reflect costs associated with 1 of the 3 budgeted elections, plus costs for the
park bond referendum election.
:>
58,305
42,583
130,726
198,273
348,748
39,135
3~8,612
112,811
485,470
115,489
401,798
50,660
113,508
178,264
55,151
38,157
36,134
187,141
98,915
83,786
206,896
1,900,273
22,187
40,076
265,484
393,278
821,&94
329,510
249,837
17,459
289,768
74,591
40,382
22,241
1,075,715
45,398
8,968,655
Park/Recreation divisions are running slightly high due to increased program activity during the su m mer months.
Park Maintenance Equipment Maintenance, Streets adjusted 1992 budgets include adjustments for settle ment of union contract.
Back-pay resuiting from this contract settlement is not yet reflected in actual expenditures.
Com munity Services -1992 actual expeditures reflects only 2 of 4 q.uarterly payments to service organizations.
Civil Defense -1992 actual expenditures include budgeted renovations to a communications van.
Streets -1992 actual expenditures reflect the summer construction/maintenance season.
Data Processing -1992 actual expenditures reflect an ~nnual system development charge paid in January.
Legal Counsel -1992 actual expenditures reflects services rendered thru March. '.' ,) /)' v"
-~.:-. I., .I
-' --~ ------
66.71%
45.64%
60.75%
63.29%
66.30%
65.77%
62.08%
67.90%
59.04%
58.12%
70.48%
75.16%
63.45%
77.61%
65.27%
79.49%
79.24%
68.03%
66.97%
56.57%
64.92% i.
60.40%
62.01%
69.46%
57.57%
65.49%
54.73%
70.97%
75.73%
57.85%
16.47%
61.35%
45.67%
63.75%
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT
FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING:
A_I:_st 31, 1992 ::.. .~
,,~. • • • EXPENDITURES • • ~>
/".1 '~:0-
:' '1991 1992 1992 ~~
", ADOPTED 1991 8/31/91 % ADOPTEDREVISED 8/31/J %
BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDEJ:
CAPITA.L OUTLAY:
, LEGISLATIVE 1 ~. • !. J, 1,900 1,835 96.58%
CITY MANAGER 5,700 6,000 6,016 100.27% 5,700 5,700 537 .9.42%
ASSESSING 8,200 4,700 4,252 90.47% 700 700 426 60.86%
INSPECTIONS 4,300 800 376 47.00% 3,000 6,500 0.00%
SAFETY 3,200 1,400 1,400 0.00%
FACILITIES 200 0.00% 13,000 13,000 '1,185 9.12%
ADMIN/PARKPLANN 350 0.00% 400 760 843 110.92%
PARKS MAINTENANCE -2,600 1,900 0.00% 650
PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY 302,200 292,300 81,406 27.85% 293,100 284,200 16,523 5.81%
RECREATION -SP.EVENTS 500 13,900 602 4.33% 500 500 0.00%
COMMUNITY CENTER 12,200 18,500 16,420 88.76% 16,200 70,000 62f>37 89.77%
BEACH
ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 200 250 250 100.00% 200 200 0.00%
RECREATION-YOUTH 500 900 0.00% 500 500 0.00%
RECREATION-ADULT 1,400 1,600 0.00% 900 900 0.00%
RECREATION-ADAPTIVE 450 443 98.44%
HIST & CULT ARTS 250 250 100.00% 600 600 0.00%
FINANCE 6,000 5,300 5,628 106.19% 342
HUMAN RESOURCES 1,800 1,818 101.00% 2,500 2,500 2,549 101.96%
COMMUNITY SERVICES 500 200 0.00%
PLANNING 3,000 4,000 4,002 100.05% 5,800 5,800 0.00%
POLICE 121,800 166,700 85,382 51.22%
e1IVIL DEFENSE 25,500 25,500 12,825 50.29%
NIMAL CONTROL 19,000 18,800 18,767 99.82%
FIRE 51,500 38,900 27,119 69.71% 840 810 96.43%
ENGINEERING 6,600 3,000 623 20.77% 1,400 2,200 800 36.36%
STREETS 49,000 17,900 6,480 36.20% 173,000 211,000 25,144 11.92%
EQUIP MAINTENANCE 89,100 53,300 51,829 97.24% 6,000 9,000 3,267 36.30%
DATA PROCESSING 4,100 4,666 113.80% 3,000 3,000 0.00%
PUBliC INFORMATION 25,000 4,500 4,500 0.00%
EMPL BENEFITS & TRAINING 400 0.00%
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 738,000 682,000 329,154 48.26% 532,400 625,700 117,748 18.82%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,275,200 13,884,100 8,959,739 64.53% 14,667,000 14,694,500 9,086,403 61.84%
RESERVATIONS OF FUND BALANCE:
NEW CITY HALL 661,800 661,800 0.00% 700,000 700,000 0.00%
CAPITAL FACILITIES 400,000 400,000 0.00%
PW/PARKS STORAGE FACILI~ 175,000 175,000 0.00%
SEVERANCE OBLIGATIONS 20pOO 20pOO 0.00% 30pOO 30 z000 0.00%
TOTAL RESERVATIONS 856 z800 856 z800 0 0.00% U30,000 l z130 z000 0 0.00%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 15,132,000 14,740,900 8,959,739 60.78% 15,797,000 15,824,500 9,086,403 57.42%
•
'I!\tO~ ---.:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT
FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING:
Aagast 31, 1992
•• EXPENDITURES ••
, : 1991 1992 1992
•
ADOPTED "1991 _ 8/31/91 ~_ ~ __ '%_ ADOPTEDREVISED 8/31192 .. " f %
BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDEr
EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES:
ELECTIONS
PARKS
COMMUNITY CENTER
POLICE 60,000 8,900 2,704
FIRE 252,000 119,300 106,734
ENGINEERING
STREETS 45,500 45,300 44,178
EQUIP MAINT
UNALLOCATED 20,600
EQUIP ACQ FUND TOTAl 357,500 194,100 153,616
30.38%
89.47%
97.52%
0.00%
79.14%
GRAND TOTAL 15,489,500 14,935,000 9,113,355 61.02%
'iF> I! ....:. .. :... I
37,100 37,800 37,771 99.92%
117,600 124,600 40,668 32.64%
15,200 15,200 4,297 28.27%
133,700 230,100 165,035 71.72%
67,500 64,900 27,339 42.12%
2,900 2,900 2,238 77.17%
164,400 185,100 169,495 91.57%
55,000 42,600 37,302 87.56%
593,400 703,200 484,145 68.85%
16,390,400 16,527,700 9,570,548 57.91%
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT
FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING:
•
ACTUAL FUND BALANCE
as of August 31, 1992, .• ...................... --------
!, ~ . . :. '.
RESERVED for Encumbrances
RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses
RESERVED for P.W. Storage Facility
RESERVED for Severance Obligations
RESERVED for New City Hall
RESERVED for Capital Facilities
UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE· --
PROJECfEDFOR YEAR-END 1992
per Originally Adopted 1992 Budget
••••••••••••••••••••
•
ERVED for Encumbrances
ERVED for Prepaid Expenses
SERVED for P.W. Storage Facility
RESERVED for Severance Obligations
RESERVED for New City Hall
RESERVED for Capital Facilities
UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE
PROJECTED FOR YEAR-END 1992
per 1992 Adjusted Budget ••••••••••••••••••••
RESERVED for Encumbrances
RESER VED for Prepaid Expenses
RESERVED for P.W. Storage Facility
RESERVED for Severance Obligations
RESERVED for New City Hall
RESERVED for Capital Facilities
UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE
•
August 31, 1992
• • FUND BALANCE • •
~.-. -
RESERVATIONS
--' BALANCE -0 --·ACTUAL . ACTUAL OF FUND BALANCE .
12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDlTURE~ BALANCE 8/31/92
61,407
73,718
325,000
213,000
661,800
o
._---3,372,71-7.. -8,240,651
4,707,702 8,240,651
(61,407)
(73,718)
(8,951,278)
(9,086,403)
30,000
700,000
400,000
(1,130,000)
o
o
o
325,000
243,000
1,361,800
400,000
1,532,150
3,861,950
========= ========= ========== ========= =========
RESERVATIONS
BALANCE BUDGETED BUDGETED OF FUND BALANCE
12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDlTURE~ BALANCE 12/31/92
61,407
73,718
325,000
213,000
661,800
o
3,372,777 14,659,400
4,707,702 14,659,400
(14,667,000)
30,000
700,000
400,000
(1,130,000)
61,407
73,718
325,000
243,000
1,361,800
400,000
2,235,177
(14,667,000) 0 4,700,102
========= ========= ========== ========= =========
RESERVATIONS
BALANCE BUDGETED BUDGETED OF FUND BALANCE
12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDlTURE~ BALANCE 12/31/92
61,407 (61,407) 0
73,718 73,718
325,000 325,000
213,000 30,000 243,000
661,800 700,000 1,361,800
0 400,000 400,000
3,372,777 14,850,200 (14,633,093) (1,130,000) 2,459,884 ----------------------------------------------4,707,702 14,850,200 (14,694,500) 0 4,863,402 ========= ========= ========== ========= =========
121'2-
1992 BUDG ET ADJUSTMENTS
***********************************************************************************4
This report incorporates the following adjustments which have been
requested and approved since adoption of the 1992 Budget in December 1991:
1. Transfer from Employee Benefits to all divisions for wage adjustllIe:nts ' .)
effective 1/1/92. (does not include union wage adjustments) ~
2. '1991 ~ncumbrances -items approved in the 1991 budget but unspent as of
,i2/31 and encumbered for expenditure in 1992:
$3,500 Inspections computer equipment
$18,000 Streets Roberts Drive Trail project
$3,000 Equipment Maintenance plasma cutter
$12,000 Parks capital outlay softball fencing
$17,000 Parks capital outlay staring lake storage building
$96,400 Equip Acq Fund police radio tower
$2,400 Equip Acqu Fund fire batteries for portables
$4,700 Parks Red Rock Lake aeration power installation
$800 Engineering capital outlay -chairs
$1,950 Engineering pavement/subgrade testing
$180 Organized Athletics color paper
$170 Youth Recreation color paper
3. Transfer $14,000 from Equip Maint equip certifs to Streets equip
certifs -delete budget for 2 small pickups and add 1 4x4 truck, with
revenue from the sale of the old vehicle making up the difference
($1,300).
4. Transfer ($2,100) from Contingency to Parks Capital Outlay for purchase
of trailer tracks.
5. Add $61,000 to Water System Maintenance budget for purchase of 3 utility
vehicles (Enterprise Funds Budget).
6. Transfer $5,000 from Contingency to Legislative for increase SW
Transportation Coalition dues.
7. Add $23,000 to Parks Certifs for skid steer loader to be funded via
deleted equipment repair budget in the General Fund ($4,000), deleted
4x4 truck ($15,000) and revenue from the sale of the old vehicle
($4,000 trade-in value).
8. Transfer $400 from printing to drop off center svcs within Solid Waste.
9. Add $1,400 for youth open gym program to be funded via $500 in program
revenues and $900 transfer from contingency.
10. Transfer $1000 from printing to pt wages within Rec Admin community
brochure program.
11. Adjust Streets Certifs budget for purchase of 2 new dump trucks rather
than the 1 new purchase and 1 refurbish originally budgeted. Total
increase from $90,000 to $108,100 to be financed via a trade-in
value($7,000), unspent appropriation for snow plow equipment($5,700),
and sale of property/auction revenue($5,400).
12. Transfer $840 from Fire training supplies to Fire capital outlay for
smoke machine budgeted incorrectly as a supply item.
13. Reinstate $500 aquatics capital outlay budget for item inadvertently
omitted from the 1992 budget.
221'd)
•
•
•
•
•
•
14 .
15.
16 .
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Transfer $1900 from Legislative recording secretaries to capital outlay
. for notebook computer purchase.
Transfer $10,000 of Streets Roberts Drive trail project carried over from
1991 to Streets CSAH Duck Lake trail project.
Transfer $360 from Park Ranger supplies to capital outlay for bicycle
budgeted incorrectly as a supply item.
T
f
' ran.stfer $8,OhOO f~odm Cal0ntingenc y to the Heritage Preservation Grant ~und ,~
or CI y matc to Ie er grant.
Transfer $5,500 from 'Contingency to the community'survey line item within
the Contingency budget.
Transfer $49,100 from Contingency to the Community Center division for
purchase of an ice resurfacer.
Transfer $30,000 of the amount appropriated for new bike trails within the
Parks Capital Outlay division to the Staring Lake storage bldg line item
within that division. Delete the remaining $30,000 new bike trails budget.
Increase the awards/scholarships line item within the Youth Recreation
budget by $1500, via a transfer from Contingency if necessary.
Transfer $19,000 from the seal coat line item within the Streets division
to the asphalt overlay line item within that division.
Various adjustments as outlined in the 1992 mid-year budget status report
to the City Manager. At mid-year the originally adopted 1992 budget was
closely compared to actual 1991 data and activity thru June 1992. These
comparisons and any necessary adjustments were made to gain a more accurate.
projection of year-end General Fund fund balance.
DISTRIBUTION OF 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET (SEPT 4, 1992)
23. Add $20,000 to the Streets division for purchase of 4 additional snow
wings and increased contract snow plowing, to be financed via cost savings
due to a mid -yr retirement and elimination of that vacated position.
24. Delete $5,000 of the amount appropriated for Fire office furniture. The
dept has determined it can postpone (to 1994?) the furniture planned for
the Chiefs office.
25. Delete $10,000 Franlo improvements budget within the Parks Capital Outlay
division. This item can be put off to 1994.
26. Transfer from Employee Benefits division to the Parks, Equipment
Maintenance, and Streets divisions to cover union wage settlement
retroactive to 1/1/92 .
•
•
•
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and city Council
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Craig W. Dawson, Assistant to the city Manager ~
October 15, 1992
Adjustment to Agreement for Services with Sterling
Group, Inc.
In March, the City executed an agreement with Sterling Group, Inc.
for services related to the acquisition of Technology Office Park
("CPT property") at 8100 Mitchell Road. The existing contract
contemplated a closing on the property by June 30, 1992. It is
apparent that this proj ect is taking several months longer to
complete, and the Sterling Group notes that it has performed much
more work than originally anticipated.
Sterling Group has requested adjustments to this agreement which
includes additional compensation of $34,200 for services through
the end of 1992.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council authorize the
City Manager to execute the October 6, 1992 proposal from Sterling
Group, Inc. to adjust the agreement for services related to
acquisition of Technology Office Park. Funding for these services
would come from the balance in the General Fund reserved for city
Hall acquisition.
CWD: jdp
Attachment
r) F~ , .~ ~ ['j
October 6, 1992
Sterling Group,lIn •
Mr. Carl J. Jullie
City Manager
600 South Highway 169
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(612) 545-1005
.. ) Suite 965
{-} 55426
Fax (612) 545-1510
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Re: Adjustment of March 11, 1992 Contract & Additional Services
Dear Carl:
The purpose of this letter is to amend our March 11, 1992 contract related to the City's
acquisition of Technology Office Park. In addition, we are responding to your request for some
additional services related to the evaluation of property management services.
Contract Adjustment
We are at the point where we need to amend our March 11, 1992 contract with the City. As you
may recall this contract contemplated a closing or resolution of the process by June 30, 1992.
It now looks like a reasonable estimate for closing is December, 1992 (an additional six months
of effort). This additional six months of effort was caused by all of the new issues raised by
C.H. Robinson which have obviously increased the amount of negotiation, correspondence,
meetings, phone calls, legal interaction, research, etc.
Furthennore, our March 11, 1992 contract provided for our involvement in various meetings:
Actual # Mtgs.
Meeting Type Contractual # Mtgs. Through 10/6192
Meetings with City's Reps.
Meetings with C.H. Robinson/CPT
Total
12
:L
19
26
24
50
As shown above, this assignment has required more than twice the number of meetings
contemplated by our original contract.
Therefore, we are requesting additional compensation for the activities related to the lengthened
C.H. Robinson Company negotiations and the increased number of meetings incurred to date (as
well as the additional meetings required between now and closing).
t'l J ! 2 ~-to
e·
e
•
•
•
Page 2
October 6, 1992
Property Management Evaluation
As requested, we are also proposing to assist the City in developing and implementing a property
management program for Technology Office Park. Our tasks would include the following:
• Through interviews with appropriate City staff we will define and develop a scope
of services which property management firms will bid on.
• We will pre-qualify property management finns and develop a list of pre-qualified
bidders.
• We will develop an RFP and solicit proposals from pre-qualified bidders.
• We will assist the City in the analysis of the various proposals.
• We will assist the City in the negotiation and awarding of a contract.
Compensation
We are proposing that our compensation for the additional six months of effort or the acquisition
portion of the contract be $29,700.
We are proposing that our compensation for Property Management Evaluation services be
$4,500.00.
The payment schedule for these two items (total $34,200.00) would be as follows:
$14,850 on or before October 31, 1992
$9,675 on or before November 15, 1992
$9,675 on or before December 15, 1992
The above compensation contemplates up to 12 more meetings (38 total) with the City's
representatives (pertaining to the acquisition effort) and up to 7 more meetings (31 total) with
C.H. Robinson and/or CPT Corporation representatives.
The proposed compensation schedule is based on the assumption that continued progress will be
made towards a closing on the purchase of 8100 Mitchell Road and lease re-negotiations or
resolution of the process by December 31, 1992. If this time period becomes unduly extended
Sterling reserves the right to request a fee adjustment or to conclude its services and submit a
final invoice. Conversely, should the City determine that it no longer wishes to pursue this
acquisition or for any reason to discontinue the services of Sterling Group, this agreement can
be canceled and our compensation will be adjusted upon the percentage of services completed.
Page 3
October 6, 1992
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
li~:f~
President
ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:
City of Eden Prairie
By: ________________________ __
Carl I. Iullie
City Manager
Stewart R. Stender
Executive Vice President
Date: _________ _
1/'11· _.L .
e
e·
e
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNI:Y, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-227
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CLEAN WATER
PARTNERSHIP GRANT APPLICATION AND
DESIGNATING PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE
WHEREAS, the Chain of Lakes Watershed within Eden Prairie is changing in land use
from agriculture/open space to urban residential; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie proposes to conduct a diagnostic/feasibility study
of the Chain of Lakes Watershed to identify methods to protect the water quality of
Round Lake, Mitchell Lake, Red Rock Lake and McCoy Lake.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as
follows:
A. The City Engineer is hereby designated as Project Representative and
authorized to submit to the MPCA a Clean Water Partnership Phase I -
Project Development Grant Application for the Chain of Lakes
Protection/Improvement Project.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
2210
,
I
/ -
,
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COU~Y, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-231
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
HIDDEN GLEN 5TH
WHEREAS, the plat of Hidden Glen 5th has been submitted in a manner required for platting
land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Hidden Glen 5th is approved upon compliance with the
recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 15,
1992.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
f' ) -. . .-" ..... "
...1-i .. LU
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council members
THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician)\*
DATE: October 15, 1992 W
SUBJECT: Hidden Glen 5th
(Resolution No. 92-231)
PROPOSAL: The owners, Frontier Development Corporation have requested
City Council approval of the final plat of Hidden Glen 5th. Located at the
northwest comer of Barrington Drive and Dell Road, the proposal consists
of replatting Outlot A of Hidden Glen 4th Addition into a single family lot
for a future building site.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council March 21,
1989, per Resolution No. 89-59.
Second reading of Ordinance No. 10-89, Zoning District Change from
RM-6.5 to PUD-IO-89-RI-9.5, was finally approved July 11, 1989.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, streets and walkways are
currently in place and available to serve this site.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Hidden Glen
5th subject to the requirements of this report and the following:
1. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250.00.
JJ:ssa
cc: Frontier Development Corporation
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
21-2\
•
•
•
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-232
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
EDEN LAKE TOWNHOMES
\
'.)
WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Lake Townhomes has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota
Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, mEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Eden Lake Townhomes is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October
15, 1992.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat .
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council members
THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technici~~.
October 15, 1992 UJ DATE:
SUBJECT: Eden Lake Townhomes
(Resolution No. 92-232)
PROPOSAL: The Developer, the Eden Lake Townhomes Limited Partnership, has requested
City Council approval of the final plat of Eden Lake Townhomes. Located south of
Medcom Boulevard and east ofTH 169, the plat contains 13 acres to be divided into one
lot and one outlot. Outlot A contains 4.25 acres and is intended to be dedicated to the
City in lieu of cash park fees. Lot 1 will be the future site as a 40-unit townhouse
project.
HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council June 2, 1992, per
Resolution No. 92-111.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 22-92, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5,
is scheduled for final approval at the City Council meeting to be held October 20, 1992.
The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution
October 20, 1992.
VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals.
UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities are located within Medcom Boulevard with
service stubs provided for the extension of utilities through this project. It is intended
that some sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer to be constructed within this
project will be publicly owned and maintained. Prior to release of the final plat the
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer detailed plans and specifications for all
public utilities to be constructed within this project.
As stated in the Developer's Agreement, the Developer shall enter into a special
assessment agreement for the upgrading of Medcom Boulevard prior to release of the
final plat.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Final Plat of Eden Lake Townhomes
(Resolution No. 92-232)
October 20, 1992
Page 2 of 2
BONDING: Bonding for the construction of all public utilities shall be provided prior to release
of the final plat.
PARK DEDICATION: Outlot A is intended to be dedicated to the City in lieu of park
dedication fees.
Recommend that the Developer's provide the City with a warranty deed for Outlot A
prior to release of the final plat.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Eden Lake Townhomes
subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following:
JJ:ssa
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $432.00
Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $870.00
Receipt of special assessment agreement for Medcom Boulevard
Receipt of warranty deed for Outlot A
Satisfaction of bonding requirements
cc: Jack Brandt, Hartford Investment, Inc.
John Bergh, Loucks & Associates
12111
•
•
•
Date:
To:
City Improvement Contract II:
CHANGE ORDER III
10/1/92
City of Eden Prairie
52-194, 52-256, 52-242
Project Name:
Contractor:
Creek Knolls, Bluffs E 12th, Valley View
Nodland Inc.
Engineer: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc.
'-
Nature of Changes:
1. Install 3-27" catch basins, 1-48" catch basin over existing 33" RCP
and 326 L.F. of HDPE per Develbper's request and City of Eden
Prairie approval.
2. Haul and place 1507 cubic yards of sand on Meade Road to bring to
subgrade elevation with Developer's approval.
Adjustment to Contract Price:
1. Add labor and material cost
3-27" CB @ $870.00 each
1-48" CB @ $930.00 each
326 L.F. HDPE @ $17.00 per L.F.
2. Add labor and material cost
1507 cubic yards @ $3.00 C.Y.
Summary of Contract Changes:
Contract Amount prior to Change Order #1:
Net Increase resulting from Change Order Ill:
Current Contract Amount including
Change Order Ill:
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED:
$ 2,610.00
930.00
5,542.00
$ 9,082.00
$ 4,521.00
$363,894.80
13 ,603.00
$ 377 , 497 • 80
Hanse~ Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc.
By (io.(,U~ !) (ZI'tnJUh-
City of Eden Prairie
~ J'
Date /V ,-1-9'1'
By ____________________ _
Date ---------------------------
THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED:
By ---::::..((}.:......-~~t~~· _
Da te _____ ~(-=o:.--..!../_~ Cf....:.....,..::;...L. ____ _
'7 I') ') C
---~ v
,)
T@W
TW1~ OTIES &WESTERN RAILROAD COMP.-\NY
•::1' , " I I , I I ;~ E:e~e~t~ ~tr~e~ E~S: I
Glencoe, MN 55336
(612) 864-5121
FAX (612) 864-6726
TO: Cit y 0 fEd e n P r air i e
10901 Red Circle Drive
Box 130
Minnetonka, MN 55343
INVOICE
N~OOJ)426
"" ~-
INVOICE # 0004 2 6
DATE Aug u s t 2 0, 1 9 g 2
TERMS Net 1 0 Day s
DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
) •
PERMIT FEES
Eden Prairie, County Road 4 Trail Bridge
R 01 No. 1 6 06 4 . 0 1
Permit to cross Railroad Tracks
Application/Preparation Fee
Crossing Fee
Annual Lease -$100.00
Billable in 5 year increments
$150.00
$300.00
$500.00
$950.00
Total Amount Due:
.ASE REMIT TO:
FREIGHT BILL -1
Terms: 7 Days ;
; , ; Send Remittance To: . ROAD
-Twin Cities & Western Railroad
: :.': S SDS -12-0839
·;",\Minneapolis. MN 55486
.-(612) 864-5121 2 "7-2 .. G
$950.00
PIPE LINE CROSSING PERMIT NO. _____ _
.----THIS AGREEMENT, mad. and .nl.,.d Inlo a. ollh. day 01 Aug us t • I 9 92. by and b.""'."n
T C i W RAILROAD COMPANY, p.ny ", Ih. fI,.1 pan. h.,.I'?aRS gall.d "R.II,oad Company". and the Cit y 0 fEd en P r air i e
,.~~
Min n e sot a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --. pany 01 Ih ••• cond p.n. h.,.lnan", c.lI.d .. LIC .......
WITNESSETH: • '-~
1. T"e Railroad Company granl. 10 the Llcen ... permlaalon 10 In.tall and malnlaln a B icy ~ 1 e / T r ail B r ~ 9 e
pip. lin •• ~ )"~~!I(d("O:< X ,l(:< X X :~~)it,",XIJII X<!il&}Q")ltQt'X ".relnarte, called "pip. lin.". .xt.ndlng upon and acroas Ihe Railroad
Company'. property .nd Iracka 1~~:It X (I( Je~C(I/(rj< X ;t!i:vftl)(".1X ~X IP:4~X
County of H = n 11,= pin , al or near Cit y 0 fEd e n
'JiI'X ~ ~}f~~~ xC!-( :~"'I:lIr9{~~WX X l( X X X k"~tx X X X X X
accol~.jilg i:O sp,=cifi::d":ior1::; of attached
P r air I ,=, C 0 R .j ~ Slate of "1 i n 11 = sot a
X ,I(tX ~~W)l!« ;{l,I(t)(~>( ~~Iorx :< l(
=tt3f from ReM Assoc. •
~ ~~XJtQtX,~ )(~X:j(IXd( tbx,l(d( ~XJ~ ~~}I,.l6,*,l'~ ~1~04~ H.;(.i(I~ X~ ~~rX lM( ~i ~it ~,¥,ltt~ Yal(~i<~~~~ X:~"1t :i.K~;; X
e'{,4o'U~~~r¥.Xt¥.XeXoX ;(11'.~~ ;w.~d( ~~"Ll :bltX-'t x.x;J.~IkXQ( X,~tXI;(.'4 Xt~X X x x X X,XIXbfeX~ ~X x,~ Xc:t ~XrXIX XIX~~ X
~IJt9(a~ ~~~ ~9(c~~'i( ~!I( XS)EI~ )4')(o~~rw· 10 be ua .. d by th.. L.lc.na.... ..xclu.lv .. ly lor b ike / t r ail b rid 9 e ,
aUb).ct to the condition a h .. r.lnatle, •• t forth.
2. Th. L.lo.n,e. .hall pay \~I. R.II,oad Como any Ih. .um 01 S 1 0 0 • 00 r,.r annum billed on a 5 y.ar ba.I.. ~ayabl.
In ad".nc. •• renta. 'or the perm).' on her.in or.nted And .".11 ••• um. and pay aU axe. and a ••••• ment. '''at may C. levied or
....... d aO.ln.1 Ih. pip. lin.. or aoaln.1 the RaO,oad c"mpany·. p,op.rty by ,.a.on 01 Ih. locallon 01 •• Id pip. line th.,eon. Whll. Ihl •
• Q, •• m.nl ,am.lna In .If.cl. tho. Rall,oad Company r ••• tv.. Ih. ,Iont to adlu.1 aald ,.ntal att.r Ih. lI,al yaar upon Ihlny (:l0) day. w,ltt.n
nollc. p,lor 10 Ih. annlv.,ury dal. 01 Ihll aorum.nt. Thll provl.lon for paym.nl .hall In no way r.al,lct tho. Rall,o.d Company', ,IOht
01 I.,mlnatlon und.r Paragraph 11 h.r.of. Acc.ptanc. of any paym.nl for any IIv. y.ar p.,lod. .v.n Ihouah a bill haa b •• n ,.nda,ed
.nd :laym.nl mad. th.,.ol. .hall not oon.tltul. an aa,eem.nl a. 10 Ih. ral. 01 paym.nt to be paid during .aCh 5 y.a, pa,lod. In addition
10 Ih. above r.ntal Ih. Llc.n ... ,hall pay Ih. Railroad Company an Appllcatlon/Pr.pa,allon I •• 01 $150.00 10 cov., Ih. CO.I 01 p,oc ... lna
Ihl. aor •• m.nt.
:I. Th. Llo.n ••••• att.r fI,.t •• cu,lno all n.c.nary publlo autho,lty •• ·hall at Ih. Llc.n ••• • •• 01 •• xp.n •• Inalall and Ih.r.att.r malnlaln
Ih. r,lp. lin. upon and acro.. Ih. Rall,oad Company'. prop.ny and und.,n.ath any rall,oad Iracka locat.d Ih.,.on 0.1 Ih. above d •• c,lb.d
local on. In a mann.r .all.lactory 10 Ih. Railroad Company'. Chlal Enaln •• ,. and In .trlct conlormlty with Ih. r.qulr.m.nt. 01 all I.w ••
o,dln.nc.a and ord.r. 01 comp.lant publlo autho,lty now .xl.tlna and lutur. modification. Ih.,.of. .0 a. nOI 10 .ndanaar Ih. .al.IY 01
rall,oad or oln., op.ratlon. upon uld prop.rty and .0 .. not 10 .ndang., Ih. laf.ty 01 Ih. p.,aon. or prop.ny n •• r 0' adJac.nl 10 Ih.
flall,oad Company', p,operty.
... Th. Llc.n... .hall b. ' •• f' on.lbl. for d.I.,mlnlng Ih. location and .xl.l.nc. 01 any pip... wlraa. condulta. ,.w.,.. plllna 0'
oth.r ob.l,uctlonl 10 Ina con.lructlon 0 Llc.n ••• •• pip. lin. and .hall Ind.mnlly Rall,oad Comp.ny la, .ny and all liability 10' damaQ" \0 •
tn. 'OroOOI"O pic... wlr •• , conduUI, •• war., piling or other Obl,ructlonl, II any. caus.1Il by 'h. conltructlon or maJntenanCI 0' llcen ••• I
;lIp. lin.. Th. Rall,oad Company mak.. no r.p, ••• nlatlon by Ih. granting 01 Ihla IIc.n.. Ihal Ita p,op.rty la Ira. 01 any .ucn pip... wi' ...
conduit •••• w.'., plllna. or oth., ob.tructJona.
5. The Llc.n... .hall .nol ca,ry on any wo,k In connecllon with the Inalallallon, malntenanc., ,.palr. chanl'llnQ 0' ,.n.wal 01
tn, ;lIp. lin. und.rn.atn or In 010.. p,oxlmlly to any ,aU,oad I,aok at the abov. d •• crID.d lac allan b.,o,a alvlna In. Chl., Enaln •• r .1
I ... t th,.. day.' w,lttan notlo. at hla h.adquarte,. locat.d al Mlnn.apoll.. Mlnn.aola. and not until an aUlhorlzad rep, ••• ntallv. 01 Iha
R.II,o.d Com~.ny ahall b. p, ••• nt 10 .up.tvl.. ..me. U~on bill. belnQ ,.nda,.d the,alo,. Ih. Llc.n... .hall p,om~lIy ,.lmDu,.. Iha
"all,~ad Comp!'ny 10' all .xpan... Incurr.d by II In conn.cllon wllh .uOh .up.tvl.lon. Includlna all labo, coal. 10' lIaam.n ,upplled by 'n. R.llroad Company 10 prolect rall,oad oporallonl, and lor Ih. Inllr. Call 01 Ih. lurnl.hlna. Ina lallation and lala' ,.moval 01 any
tampo,ary .uppon. lor .ald track.. which .ald Chl.1 EnQln •• , or hi. aUlho,lz.d ,.p,aa.nlallv. may con.ld.r n.c .... ry wnlla luch wo,,,
I. In prog' ....
II. Th. Llc.n... at Ih. Llcen ••• •• '01. .xp.n •• , wh.n.v.r notlfl.d 10 do .0, .hall p,omptly make .uch repal,a 10 or chana.'
In Ih. pip. lin., Including Chang. In location. aa .ald Chl., Engln •• r or hi. aulho,lzed r.p, ••• nlatlve .hall lor any ,.aaon conald.'
n.c .... ry and r.qul,.. Th. Railroad Comp.ny .hall have Ih. ,Ighl. at II. .1.cUon. 10 make .m.rg.ncy r.pal'l 10 Ih. pip. lin.. and In
.uch .v.nt Ih. Llc.n.... upon bllll b.lng r.nd.,.d Ih.refor. will promptly r.lmbure. Ih. Railroad Company for all axp.nul Incurred In
connlcllon Ih.rewlth.
7. Mal"t.nanc. and us. 01 Ih. pip. lin. upon and ac,o.. Ih. Rallrolld Como.ny·s propany al Ih. above d.lcrlb.d location. how.v., long eonllnu.d •• hall not veal In Iha Lle.na •• any tlOhl. advarae 10 Ihou 01 Ih. Hallroad Company.
II. Th. Llc.nae. ahall a .. uma .11 rl.k 01 damao. 10 or dest,uctlon of Iha ploe lin. througn any cauee whalso.v.r while located
upon and ac,o.. Ih. Rall,oad Company'l p,op.rty. and .hall .1 all IImea lully Indemnity Ih. Railroad Company aoalnal all liability. claim.,
o.mand., .ult.. /udg.menl.. co.ta and Ixp.n... by re .. on 01 10.. or damage 10 p,openy and Injury 10 0' dealn 01 p."onl whal.oave,
or wnom.o.v.,. n .ny mann.r a,I.lnll Irom 0' g,owlng out 01. directly 0' IndIrectly. wholly 0' In pan. Ih. In.lallatlon. malnl.nance. ,.pal,.
e!'lanQlnll. r.n.wal. .xl.tence 0' ~.moval of Ine pip. lin. upon. ac,o.. 0' from the Railroad Company'. propllny at Ih. ACCW" Ctu;:r\bed
loc.llon.
II. Th. walv., by Ih. Railroad Company 01 • b,each by the Llcen ... of any provl.lon h.,eol •• hall b. limited 10 Ihe act or omlealon
con. muting .ucll breach. and Ihall nOI con.mul. a continuing or p.,m.n.nt walv.,. '
10. Thl. agr.em.nl or Ih. p.rmlnlon h.r.ln granled ahall nOI b. a .. lgn.d or Iran".,r.d by Ih. Llc.nl.e In any mann.r. by
op.r.tlon 01 law or Olh.,.,..,IIII. wllhoul Ih. wrltlen con .. nt 01 Ih. Rall,oad Company. Subject Ih.relo. Ihll agre.m.nt Ihall Inur. 10 tha
Dan.m 01. and ba binding upon. Ih. IUCO ... O'I. anlOnl and I .• gal rep, ... ntallv •• of Ih. r .. pecllve p.rtl ....
1 1. Thla agre.m.nl Ihall oonllnue In .If.ct unlll lermlnal.d 'by ellhe, perty' upon Ihlrty (:10) daya' w,ltlen notlc. 10 Ih. other
pa,ty. Any notlc. glv.n by Ih. Rall,oad Comp.ny h.,aund.r .hall b. good If d.pollled In a Unll.d Sial. I poal olllc.. c.,tllI.d
mall. .dd' •••• d to Ih. Llcen •• e al Ihe Llc.n ••• •• 1 •• 1 known .ddr.... Wh.n .0 I.,mlnal.d. the Railroad Company .hall make
",oponlon.l. ralund 10 the Llc.n... 01 ranlal Ihal .hall have b.en paid In advanc. aft II' d.ducllon 01 any amounll payabl. by Ih.
Llc.n .... ha,.und.r.
12. Th. Lle.ns.. at Iha Llc.n ••• •• .01. eXCllln... withIn Ihlrly day, Irom Ihe dal. of .. ,vic. 01 nollce of dermlnallon 'la above p,ovld.d. ahall lake up and remove .. Id pipe line Irom the Ramoad Company. p,op.rty al Il'Ie above d ... crlbe lac allan .nd
,eatore uld property 10 a condition ullalactory to uld Chl., Engln ... r. Failure on Ih. pan 01 Ihe Llcen... 10 dO 10 Ihall conalltUle
an abandonm.nl of the pip. line by Ihe Llcen.e •• and Ihe Railroad Company Ihall hava Ih. ,Ight 10 r.mov. Ih. whol. or or any part
cl tho pip. lin. Irom laid p,op.rty and perlo,m ... Id wo,1I 01 r .. lorallon. and In ellhe, .v.nt Ih. Llcen.... upon a bill being rend"ed
Ih.,.,or. ah.1I p,omplly relmbur •• Ih. Railroad Company lor all axp.na •• Incurred In conn.ctlon Ih.rewlth. plu. IItt •• n p.,c.nl. ,
13. Th. Rall,oad Company .hall not b. ,.qul,ed 10 as.um. any ponlon of Ih. co.t 01 Iha con.tructlon 01 uld pipe lin. 0' lutu,o
malnlenance Ihe,.ol.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ih.
fea, fir It above w,lIIen.
panloll h.reto have C:llu •• d Il'lla agreement 10 be duty oxecuted aa 01 Iho day and
Nlln •••• e: TC J.W RAILROAD COMPANY
Bv _____ _
•
• VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 9-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER AND A ZONING DISTRICT
AMENDMENT WITHIN THE Rl-22 DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND
IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION
11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the RI-22 District
and be placed in the Public District on 6.6 acres and that the land be amended within the RI-22 District on 3.4
acres.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from
the RI-22 District and shall be included hereafter in the Public District, and the land shall be amended within «e R 1-22 District on 3.4 acres and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code
ection 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled" General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted
in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
Agreement dated as of October 20, 1992, entered into between Victory Lutheran Church, a non-profit
Corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement,
between The Harry A. Rogers Estate, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of October 20, 1992, which
Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of
April, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City on the 20th day of October, 1992.
ATTEST:
4tOhn D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ________ _
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-212
Victory Lutheran Church
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH
•
WHEREAS, Victory Lutheran Church applied for site plan approval of Victory Lutheran Church on
6.6 acres for construction of a 7,600 square foot Church on property located East of Eden Prairie Road, West
of Red Oak Drive and North of Bergen Drive, to be zoned Public by Ordinance No. 9-92 adopted by the City
Council on April 7, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its January 13,
1992, February 10, 1992 and March 9, 1992 Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said
site plans; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1992,
meeting;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE crI'
OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Victory Lutheran Church for Victory Lutheran
Church for construction of a 7,600 square foot Church, based on plans dated April 2, 1992, subject to the terms
and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement between Victory Lutheran Church, a non-profit
corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated October 20, 1992, for Victory Lutheran Church.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-210
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE NO. 9-92 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
Victory Lutheran l::hurch
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1992;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 9-92, which is attached hereto, is approved, and
the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than
non-pareil, or six -point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331. 07 .
• C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during
regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted
in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 9-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication
required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1992.
ATI'EST:
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
VICTORY L~ ... ClJUR~
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ,)
ORDINANCE NO. 9-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER AND A ZONING DISTRICT
AMENDMENT WITHIN THE Rl-22 DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF
LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located East of Eden Prairie Road, west
of Red Oak Drive and north of Bergen Drive from the Rl-22 to the Public District on 6.6 acres and Zoning
District Amendment within the Rl-22 District on 3.4 acres, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's
agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the fun legal description of this property.
Effective Date:
ATIEST:
lsi John D. Frane
City Clerk
This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
IslDouglas B. Tenpas
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _________ _
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
•
•
•
•
"'e
EXHIBIT A
Victory Lutheran Church
Preliminoarv Plat
Outlot C REO ROCK SHORES. aC("".ordinO to the racordod plat moreot, Honnepln County, Minnosota.
and that part of Ihe southeast QU:lrtor ot Socllon 17; Township 116, Range 22 doscribed as
fo/:::>ws: ··1
8e-ctnnlng at the sou:heast corner ot the south8a~t Quartor of saId section: thenco north
alol1Q the east line of said soultloa3t Quarter a distance of 517.0 foet; thence w-:st 935.88
feet more of less 10 the canter1ine of County Road No.4; thence south 520.74 feel more or
less along Ille centerline of saId County Road No.4 to the southerly line ot said southeast
Quarter; thence east 775.0 teot more or less to (he poInt of beginning.
Ex-capt
mat part of Lot 6, Sloc_1< 2. and Red Oak Drive, as platted as REO ROCK SHORES, according
to the recorded p{st rnereot, HennepIn County, Minnesota.
SUbject to easements tor County Rd. NO.4 and lake Shore Drive.
Guide Plan Change, Rezoning to Public. Site Plan Review
That part of the southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 16, Range 22 described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast comer of the southeast Quarter of said section; thence west along the south line of
said southeast Quarter a distance of 193.37 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North
2° 46' 48-East, a distance of 283.55 feet; thence South 89° 38' 46-West, a distance of 41.00 feet; thence North
o degrees 21' 46" West, a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South 89° 38' 14-West, a distance of 680.00 feet more
or less to the enterline of County Road No.4; thence southerly 395.00 feet along the centerline of said County. Road
No.4; thence North 76° 21' 06" East, a distance of73.00 feet; thence South 89° 38' 46" East, a distance of 104.00
feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 220 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, with a Cldius
of 140 feet more or less to the southerly line of said southeast Quarter; thence easterly along the south line of said
southeast Quarter, a distance of 307.63 feet to the point of beginning .
7 ,"") 0,°' / ,: .r: --..;
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT •
VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of October 20, 1992, by Lutheran Church Missouri
Synod, Minnesota South District, a non-profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low
Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Public and Zoning District
Amendment within the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres; Preliminary Plat of 10
acres into 5 lots and road right of way for construction of a 7,600 square foot Church and four single family
lots, all said 10 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No.9-92, Developer covenants
and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: •
I. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials, revised and
dated April 2, 1992, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 7, 1992, and attached
hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHmIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer
at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. STREET VACATION: Concurrent with and as part of the final plat for the Property,
Developer shall submit to the City a petition to vacate that portion of Lake Shore Drive as
depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
4. DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Concurrent with, and as part of, the
final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to dedicate the westerly 17 feet of Property to
Hennepin County for County Road 4 right-of-way purposes.
Developer also agrees to dedicate concurrent with, and as part of, the final plat for the Property,
a drainage and utility easement of sufficient size to cover the storm water holding pond designed
to National Urban Runoff Policy standards, and as approved by the City Engineer, together with
a drainage and utility easement of 20 feet in width over the storm sewer outlet pipe from Lake
Shore Drive to the storm water ponding area, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. •
~I': A'?:
_ ............ ..."...,1
•
•
•
5.
6.
---------------
.:;
'!.
STREET, UTILITY, STORM WATER PONDING, EROSION CONTROL PLANS: Prior
to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submi(· to the City
Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sew~r, water,
interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, storm water ponding, and erosion control for the
Property, including:
A. Detailed plans for the connection of the 8 inch watermain from the terminus of existing
Berger Drive to the watermain along the west side of County Road 4.
B. Providing for connection of public sanitary sewer and watermain to the front property line
of the existing house at 160 11 Lake Shore Drive.
C. Detailed plans for the design and construction of the storm water holding pond to meet
the National Urban Runoff Policy standards, as depicted in Exhibit B.
Developer agrees that all street, utility and storm water ponding improvements shall be under
construction prior to any building permit issuance for any lot on the Property, and that no
occupancy permits shall be issued until all said improvements are substantially completed.
LAND ALTERATION PERMIT/DRAINAGE SWALE: Prior to any construction or
development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the
City Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the property. Along with other
conditions of said land alteration permit, Developer agrees to construct a drainage swale across
that portion of the vacated Lake Shore Drive near the existing house in the southeast comer of
the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, in order to provide a storm water drainage outlet for the
existing house. Developer further agrees to restore all portions of vacated Lake Shore Drive
with seed and mulch.
7. ACCESS: Developer acknowledges and agrees that access for the Church property and
residential lot located in the southwest comer of the property will take place from Berger Drive
only, and that direct access to County Road 4 shall not be permitted.
Developer acknowledges that access to County Road 4 for the residential Properties located south
of this Property, by way of Berger Drive, is dependent on the construction of bypass lanes at the
intersection with County Road 4 and that County Road upgrading is not yet underway.
Developer also acknowledges that the upgrading of County Road 4 by Hennepin County is not
scheduled to begin until 1995. Therefore, Developer agrees that prior to the completion of
Berger Drive construction, temporary traffic barricades shall be placed along Berger Drive east
of the church entrance and at the south property line until such time when County Road 4
improvements are substantially completed by Hennepin County.
.-);. I I; { .; ~l .J -, .. ..-'
8. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading 'A
construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation, ~
Natural Resources, and obtain the Director's approval of detailed plans, for the extension of the
8 foot wide bituminous trail located along the east side of County ROad 4, southerly to the
proposed Berger Drive intersection with the County Road. Plans shall also include the removal
and site restoration of that portion of the 8 foot wide bituminous trail on the west side of County
Road 4 up to the point with the intersection of proposed Berger Drive.
Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, Developer agrees
to construct, or cause to be constructed, said trail improvements concurrent with street and utility
construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C,
attached hereto.
9. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS: Prior to issuance by the City of any building permit
for the church portion of the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning,
and to obtain the Director's approval of samples of all exterior materials to be implemented on
the structure as depicted in Exhibit B, including building materials for the trash enclosure to
substantially match building materials for the church.
Upon approval by the Director of Planning of such samples, Developer agrees to install, or cause
to be installed, such exterior materials, as approved by the Director of Planning, in accordance
with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
10. SITE LIGHTING DETAILS: The City has approved an exterior lighting plan for the Prope~
as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, consisting of four, 20 foot high, downcast cut=~11'"
luminar fixtures.
Prior to issuance by the City of any building permit for the church portion of the Property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Director of Planning, and to obtain the Director's approval
of a detailed sample of the lighting standards to be implemented as part of the church
construction.
11. DEVELOPMENT BEYOND PHASE I: Developer acknowledges that approval has been
granted for only phase one of the church project, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and
that any development beyond this phase will require City review and approval based on
applicable procedures in effect at the time of application for development. Such review shall,
at a minimum, require public meetings and/or hearings before the Planning Commission and City
Council.
•
,) ') ?::-
.#---~--.) -,.;
• /
•
•
< ... ,...
EXHIBIT A
Victory Lutheran Church
Prelimin-arv Plat
Outlot C REO ROCK SHORES. <l<X".ordinO to tho recordOO plat thoroof. Honnepln County, Minnosota,
and that part of tna southeast Qu:]rtor at Soctlon 17, TownShip 116, Range 22 doscribed as'
tor:~ws: >\
8eQfnnlng at the sou:heast corner at the southea:;t Quartor of saId section; thence north 'J
aloOQ the east linc of said SQulhoast Quarter a distance of 517.0 foat; thence W%t 935.88
feet more of less 10 the canter1ine of County Road NO.4; thance south 520.74 feet more or
less along the centerline of said County Road No.4 to the southerly line of said southeast
Quarter; thence east 775.0 (eol mora or tess to Ihe poInt of begInning.
ElCcapl
mat part of Lot 6, Sloc_k 2. and Red Oak Drive. as platted as REO ROCK SHORES, according
to the recorded plat thereot. HennepIn County, Minnesota.
Subject to easements for County Rd. NO.4 and Lako Shore Drive.
Guide Plan Change. Rezoning to Public, Site Plan Review
That part of the southeast Quarter of Section 17. Township 16, Range 22 described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast comer of the southeast Quarter of said section; thence west along the south line of
said southeast Quarter a distance of 193.37 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North
r 46' 48" East, a distance of 283.55 feet; thence South 89° 38' 46" West, a distance of 41.00 feet; thence North
o degrees 21' 46" West, a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South 89° 38' 14" West, a distance of 680.00 feet more
or less to the enterline of County Road No.4; thence southerly 395.00 feet along the centerline of said County Road
No.4; thence North 76° 21' 06" East, a distance of73.00 feet; thence South 89° 38' 46" East, a distance of 104.00
feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 220 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, with a radius
of 140 feet more or less to the southerly line of said southeast Quarter; thence easterly along the south line of said
southeast Quarter, a distance of 307.63 feet to the point of beginning.
OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO
DEVEWPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN
The Harry A. Rogers Estate
AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
,)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of October 20, 1992 by and between the Harry A.
Rogers Estate, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred
to as "City":
For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. 9-92, changing the zoning of
the Property owned by Owner from the RI-22 District to the Public District, as more fully described in that
certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of October 20, 1992, by and between Lutheran Church Missouri
Synod, Minnesota South District, a Non-Profit Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows:
1.
2.
3.
If Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, Minnesota South District, fails to proceed in accordance
with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose
the rezoning of the Property to the Rl-22 District.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assign.
of the Property. ..,
If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring
that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement.
•
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 22-92
Eden Lake Townhomes
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DFSCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPI'ER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District
and be placed in the RM-6.5 District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from
the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RM-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in
each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
ecCOrdinglY.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted
in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
Agreement dated as of October 20, 1992, entered into between Eden Lake Townhomes Limited Partnership,
a Limited Partnership and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's
Agreement, between Lariat Companies Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as
of October 20, 1992, which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of
June, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City on the 20th day of October, 1992.
ATTEST:
\ John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
.UBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of ______ _
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-191
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE NO. 22-92 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
Eden Lake Townhomlt
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 22-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of June, 1992;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 22-92, which is attached hereto, is approved,
and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than
non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07.
C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person duri~
regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be post~
in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 22-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of
publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MlNNF.SOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 22-92
Eden Lake TOWnhomes
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located South of Medcom Boulevard East
of Eden Prairie Medical Building, from the Rural District to the RM-6.5 District, subject to the terms and
conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description
of this property.
Effective Date:
• ATTEST:
lsI John D. Frane
City Clerk
This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication .
IslDouglas B. Tenpas
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of ______ , 199_.
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
•
EXHIBIT A
Preliminary Plat
Outlot E, The Preserve Commercial Park South.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, Zoning District Chan!!e and Site Plan Review
That part of Outlot E. THE PR::SERVE COM!viERCIAL PARK SOUTH,
which lies Easterly of the following described lIne:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlot E; thence
North 89 degrees 57 minutes 58 seconds West, assumed bearing,
along the South line of said Outlot E a distance of 597.00 feet
to tne paint of beginning of the line to be herein described;
thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 24 seconds Eas: a distance of
330.00 feet; thence North 8 degrees 41 minutes 33 seconds West
a distance of 157.61 feet to the Northwesterly line of said
Outlot E; thence North 38 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds East
along Said Northwesterly line a distance of 286.61 feet to the
north lIne of said Outlot E and said line there terminating.
?'l U I --; {
•
•
••
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-192
Eden Lake Townhomes
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR EDEN LAKE TOWNHOMES FOR EDEN LAKE TOWNHOMES PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, Eden Lake Townhomes Partnership has applied for site plan approval of Eden Lake
Townhomes on 8.7 acres for construction of a 40 unit Townhouse on property located South of Medcom
Boulevard, east of the Eden Prairie Medical Building, to be zoned RM-6.5 by Ordinance No. 22-92 adopted
by the City Council on June 2, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its May 11, 1992
Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 2, 1992,
meeting;
.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
WbF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Eden Lake Townhomes Partnership for Eden Lake
Townhomes for construction of a 40 unit townhouse building, based on plans dated April 10, 1992, subject to
the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement between Eden Lake Townhomes Partnership,
a corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated October 20, 1992, for Eden Lake Townhomes.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
DEVELOPER'S AGREEl\1ENT
.--
. •
Eden Lake Townhomes
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of October 20, 1992 by Eden Lake Townhomes
Limited Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Public
Open Space to Medium Density Residential on 8.7 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 8.7
acres, and Preliminary Plat of 13 acres into two lots for construction of a 40 unit rental townhouse project, all
said 13 acres situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. 22-92, Developer covenants
and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows:
1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed an.
approved by the City Council on April 10, 1992, revised and dated June 2, 1992, and attached
hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer
at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements,
and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of the
final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, irrigation systems, storm sewer,
and erosion control for the Property. .
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those
improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
4. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT AND TREE REPLACEMENT: Prior to any construction
or development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the
City Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property, which will include
provisions for tree replacement among other conditions. •
•
•
•
5.
<.
City and Developer acknowledge that the total number of caliper inches of significant trees on
the property is 316 caliper inches. Total tree loss on the property is 316 caliper inc~s of trees,
of which 316 caliper inches are required to be replaced during development~· \
'J
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR l\1EDCOM BOULEV ARD: Prior to release by the City of
the final plat for the property, or release of any permit for building on the property, Developer
agrees to enter into a special assessment agreement for the upgrading of Medcom Boulevard to
provide public street access and utilities to the property.
6. MEDCOM BOULEVARD CONSTRUCTION: Developer and City acknowledge that the
initial grade of Medcom Boulevard, which is currently a dead-end street, will not be the same
as the fmal grade of Medcom Boulevard at such time as Medcom Boulevard is extended to the
east.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Developer further agrees that, at such time as Medcom Boulevard is extended to the east,
Developer shall be responsible for adjustment of the final grade on the property to match the
adjusted final grade of Medcom Boulevard when said road is extended to the east.
SIDEWALK AND TRAll.. CONSTRUCTION: Concurrent with street and utility construction
on the property, Developer agrees to construct an 8 foot wide bituminous trail, built to City
Specifications along the west side of the driveway access to Medcom Boulevard, along the west
side of the pond, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto .
Developer further agrees to construct a woodchip trail as shown in Exhibit B. The woodchip
trail shall be constructed concurrent with street and utility construction. The trail location shall
be approved by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources prior to construction.
PARK DEDICATION AND CASH PARK FEE: Outlot A shall be dedicated to the City free
and clear of all liens, mortgages and encumbrances in lieu of park dedication fees.
ACCESS EASEMENT: Developer shall include as part of the final plat a 70 foot wide road
easement on proposed lot one which provides access from Outlot A to the proposed access drive.
The proposed road easement is subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to fmal plat
approval.
EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to Building Permit issuance, Developer shall submit samples
of exterior materials and colors for review and approval of the Director of Planning.
IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to Building Permit issuance, Developer shall submit an irrigation
plan for review and approval by the Director of Planning .
EXHIBIT A
Preliminary Plat
Outlot E, The Preserve Commercial Park South.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change. Zoning District Change and Site Plan Review
That part of Outlot E. THE PRESERVE COMrvlERCIAL PARK SOUTH,
which lies Easterly of the following described lIne:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlot E; thence
North 89 decrees 57 minutes 58 seconds Wes~, assumed bearinc,
along the South line of said Outlot E a dis~ance of 597.00 feet
to the point 07 beginning of the line to be herein described;
thence North 1 degree 00 minutes 24 seconds East a dis~ance of
330.00 feet; thence North 8 degrees 41 minutes 33 seconds West
a distance of 157.61 feet to the Northwesterly line of said
Outlot E; thence North 38 degrees 51 minutes 30 seconds East
along said Northwesterly line a dis~ance of 286.61 feet to the
north lIne of said Outlot E and said line there terminating.
•
•
•
----------------------------
•
ROBERT I. LANG
ROGER A. PAULY
DAVID H. GREGERSON·
RICHARD F. ROSOW
MARK J. JOHNSON
JOSEPH A. NILAN
JOHN W. LANG, CPA
JUDITH H. DUTCHER
BARBARA M. ROSS
WILLIAM R. MILLER
TODD A. SATrLER
,. Also Authorized to
Practice Law in W iscauin
Mr. John Frane
City Clerk
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4400 IDS CENTER
80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE: (612) 338-0755
FAX: (612) 349-6718
October 9, 1992
,)
EDEN PRAIRIE OFFlCE
SUITE 370
250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE!, MINNESOTA 55344
TELEPHONE, (612) 829-7355
FAX: (612) 82~U7\3
REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
•
RE: $465,000.00 -City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Industrial Refunding
Revenue Bonds, (Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc. Project),
Series C (the "Bonds")
Dear Mr. Frane:
I am returning to you the document forwarded to me regarding the amendment to the
Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc. Bond transaction. I have reviewed the amendments as well
as drafts of the original agreements. I have no objection to the proposed amendments.
The city should place this on its agenda for Tuesday, October 20th to authorize execution
and delivery of the First Supplemental Trust Indenture and First Amendment to a Loan
Agreement. Those documents should then be signed by the Mayor and City Manager and
returned to the company's attorney in the envelope they provided.
If you have any questions, please call.
• RFR/smt
Enclosure
rD\ep'Jtind-care\l-Crane
Very truly yours,
"1;'"1 "I / / Ie I) -... -.. , \".
EGERSON, LTD.
KinderCare®
KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc. 2400 Presidents Drive
P.o. Box 2151
Montgomery, AL 36102.2151
205·277·5090
october 1, 1992
John Frane, City Clerk
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Re: $465,000
Dear Mr. Frane:
City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Industrial Refunding Revenue Bonds,
(Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc.
project), Series C (the "Bonds")
As you may be aware, Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc. (the "Company") has
been in the process of restructuring its debt with its creditors for the last two
years. As part of this restructuring the Company, with the support of The Bank
of New York ("BONY"), as issuer of the letter of credit supporting the above-
referenced Bonds (the "Letter of Credit"), and upon the review of First Alabama
Bank, as trustee (the "Trustee") for the above-referenced Bonds, has prepared
certain documents in connection with the Bonds to facilitate such a
restructuring. Enclosed herewith are the following documents.
1. Supplemental Trust Indenture dated as of October 1, 1992 between the
Companv and you, as Issuer of the Bonds (the "Supplemental Trust Indenture").
The document is designed to remove an Act of Bankruptcy on the part of the
Company as an event of default under the Trust Indenture provided that a Letter
of Credit remains in full force and effect. Please note that this document needs
to be executed by you, as Issuer.
2. First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of October 1, 1992 between
the Companv and you, as Issuer of the Bonds (the "Loan Agreement Amendment").
This is designed to permanently remove an Act of Bankruptcy on the part of the
Company as an event of default under the Loan Agreement provided that a Letter
of Credit remains in full force and effect. Please note that this document needs
to be executed by you, as Issuer.
•
•
•
•
•
•
John Frane
October 1, 1992
Page -2-
As you are probably aware, these proposed actions will require Bondholder
consent. As a precautionary matter, we have also decided to seek a Waiver from
the Bondholders in the event that this event of default occasioned solely by an
Act of Bankruptcy should occur. Accordingly, we have also enclosed for your
information the following documents which were part of the package that was sent
to the Bondholders. Please note that these documents do not require any action
on your part as Issuer.
1. Notice of Requested Waiver and Consent to Amendments (the "Notice").
The Notice explains in detail what actions were being requested by the Company
and why the proposed actions are being requested. The Notice should be very
helpful to you in providing background information.
2. Bondholder Consent. This document is designed to evidence the
Bondholder's consent to the Trustee's execution of the Supplemental Trust
Indenture and the Trustee's consent to the Loan Agreement Amendment.
3. Bondholder Waiver. This document is designed to waive in advance
the event of default under the Master Indenture and the Master Loan Agreement
occasioned solely by an Act of Bankruptcy and the requirement that the Trustee
draw upon the Letter of Credit upon such as event of default provided that a
Letter of Credit remains in full force and effect.
This letter will serve as a request upon you to review the enclosed and,
if acceptable to you, to execute the enclosed Supplemental Trust Indenture and
First Amendment to Loan Agreement, and return the same to the Trustee c/o Ann
Jones, Alston & Bird, One Atlantic Center, 1201 West Peachtree Street, Atlanta,
Georgia 30309 using the enclosed envelope. We request that you execute the
Supplemental Trust Indenture and the First Amendment to Loan Agreement on or
before October 23, 1992. We have requested the Bondholders to respond by this
date and hope that you, as Issuer, will also be able to respond by this date.
Of course, if you have any questions or comments please call me.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
~)'A~!l4~
Jan R. Hollon
Treasurer
JRH:bjb
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Tull Gearreald, Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc •
Mr. Frederick E. Ball, II, The Bank of New York
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager
FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~
DATE: October 9, 1992
SUBJECT: Change Order # 3, Eden Prairie Community Center Addition
Staff requests the City Council approve change order #3 for the ice rink addition to the
Community Center in the amount of $2,356.00.
A copy of the change order is attached to the memorandum.
This change order brings the total of change orders to $149,148.53 on this $2,047.348.53
contract. The largest sum of the change orders to date is the $166,348 cost to accept alt. #1
which was to complete the H.S. locker rooms in the North Star Addition, ($28,616.00 of the
change orders have been deducts) .
CHANGE
ORDER
AlA DOCUMENT elm
Distribution to:
OWNER 0
ARCHITECT ~
CONTRACTOR 0
rlELD 0
OTH[R 0
PROJECT: Eden Prairie Comm. Ctr. Addition
(name, address) 16700 Valley Vie\'I Road
• CIIANCE ORDER NUl\4i3ER: TIlREE n )
Eden Prairie, MN
TO (Contractor):
INITIATION DATE: Seot. 28, 1992
r-5hingobee Builders Inc.
279 t1edi na St. N.
Loretto, MN 55357
L
I
--1
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:
CONTRACT FOR:
CONTRACT DATE:
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
No.
RFP r,1-5
RFP r1-6
RFP G-7
RFP (1-8
RFP G-9
RFP G-ll
RFP S-12
CA ~1-2
CA G-8
CA GM-9
Item
Revise water service from 6" to 8".
Revise "'later line from 4" to 3" /
3" meter to 2".
Add aisle to three (3) bleacher sections.
Revise hardware doors HS3 & HS7C.
Revise clhorine room.
Revise doors EOl & E02 per drav.Jing.
Revise bathroom accessories & signage.
Revise gas line from east to west.
Additional demolition & revise doors
l26A & B.
Add floor drain make shower HCP access.
)
Cut openings in precast.
TOTAl
Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect.
Amount
$ 1,000.00
(1,450.00)
1,000.00
(330.00)
110.00
440.00
255.00
No chanoe
445.00
486.00
400.00
$ 2,356.00
9117.0
Construction
t1ay 21, 1992
High School
(270.00 H.S.)
High School
High School
Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, includin g any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) (dJaj;jrlr.rirlcf t#al#t:/rVt t#t/J was .................. . . . . . . . .. $
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $
The (Contract Sum) (4JIrUtMJ Malxtr/l1JrhlddstJ prior to this Change Order was .......... $
The (Contract Sum) ({,Urf.l.Me1UM/JrIoI.J1rI iMt) will be (increased) (ri4cU<lsU)/(j.J/1'/JlJtk)ri)
by this Change Order .................................... ,.......... . . . . . . . . .. $
The new (Contract Sum) (¢MrjJ.~t#¢M<lx/r{i~rf1fJcfsfJ including this Change Order will be ... $
1,898,200.00
146,792.53
2,044,992.53
2,356.00
2,047,348.53
•
The Contract Time will be (iMrN*fJl Nef./f/aHrf'J/(unchanged) by ( ) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
Delano Erickson Architects
ARCHITECT
Address
L-_--
DATE
AlA DOCUMtl'>lT G701 • GP,I,H.;;: rWDER •
'"I j' : ; r!' '
Shingobee Builders
CONTRACTOR
Address
" 1<J7B '. \,~, ,
December 18, 1992
Authorized:
City of Eden Prairie
OWNER
Address
By ________________ __
DATE
•
.-•• ,.., • i'\~···
..
•
•
•
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Background
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Department
Bob Lambert, Director of
Natural Resources
Parks, Recreation and
Dave Black, Community Center Operations Supervisor
June 30, 1992
Recommendation for Soft Drink Proposal to Finance
Scoreboard for Community Center New Ice Arena
The City approached Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola to solicit
sponsorship money to be used toward the purchase of a scoreboard
for the new ice arena. Both Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola have
responded with proposals which would cover the estimated cost of
a new Daktronics brand scoreboard.
The scoreboard we are interested in purchasing is a Daktronics
model H-2813, which is iaentical to the existing ice arena's
scoreboard. It will feature bar line lighting which requires
less light bulb changing. It will also feature a control panel
which is interchangeable with our existing equipment.
Royal Coin Vending currently is supplying the Community Center
with soft drlnk and juice vending machine service, and pays the
City a commission on sales. They also supply candy, chip and
coffee vending machines at the Community Center and pays the City
a commission on sales.
Pepsi-Cola cu~rently
concession stands at a
available for sale.
provides the
cost to the
Terms and Conditions of Proposals
products for sale in the
City based on product made
Each proposal calls for a 5 year term of agreement for exclusive
soft drink and juice vending machine rights at the Community
Center, exclusive pouring rights at concession stands at the
Community Center and a trademark logo to be placed on the
scoreboard in the new ice arena.
Analysis
To determirle which proposal provides the City with the best
options, each condition has h~en analyzed (see attached staff
comparison). Based on this comparison, Coca-Cola's proposal is
the City's best option.
(
(
l
Recommpndation
Staff ~ecommends the City ente~ into a 5 yea~ ag~eement1 based OR
the te~ms and conditions as p~oposed by Coco-Cola:1f~~ t~~
pu~chase of a sco~eboa~d in the new ice a~ena. ,)
Staff fu~ther ~ecommends that Royal Coin Vending continue to
supply chips, candy and coffee vending macnines at the Community
Cente~, including the expansion of thei~ se~vices into the new
a~ena fo~ candy, chips and coffee vendi~g machines.
Attachment: Staff Compa~ison of Soft D~ink P~oposals
cc: Lau~ie Helling, Manage~ of Rec~eation Se~vices
ll~11 . ,/.-::1
••
•
STAFF COMPARISON OF SOFT DRINK PROPOSALS
Full Service Vending Machine ~
at $.60 per can of pop/water ~~
(commission to the City per case/per can)
Existing
Royal Coin Vending
$4.32/case
$ .1S/can
Pepsi Cola
$4.44/case
$ .lS5/can
Coca-Cola
$5.20/case
$.2166/can
Full Service Juice Vending Machine
at $.75 per can of juice
(commission to the City per case/per can)
Existill9..
Royal Coin Vendin~
$2.70/case
$.1125/can
Existing
.~L~
$13.00/5 gal. unit
$34.00/5 gal. unit
Existing
Pepsi Cola Pepsi
pepsi Cola
No Commission
Fountain Concession Equipment
Cola
Pepsi Cola
Pre Mix Products
using bag in box system
$13.00/5 gal. unit
Post Mix Products
using bag in box system
$34.00/5 gal. unit
Trademark Cups
$63.00/case s63.00/case 12 oz. 2500 to a case
$43.00/case $43.00/case 16 oz. 1000 to a case
$Sl.00/case $51.00/case 20 oz. 1000 to a case
Do not supply Do not supply 77 .L..L. oz . 1200 to a case
Products
Coca-Col a_
S5.90/case
S.245/can
Coca-Cola
Sll.50/5 gal. unit
$34.25/5 gal. unit
Coca-Cola
$S8.00/case
$38.00/case
Do not supply
$50.00/case
Both beverage companies otter
.,aters. and juices.
a fine assortment of colas, other pops~
•
•
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEHORANJ)UH
Mayor and city Council
Craig W. Dawson, Assistant to the city Manager ~
October 15, 1992
Second Reading or Ordinances on council
compensation
On October 13, 1992, the City council approved the first reading
of two ordinances verbally labeled as 39-92 and 39-92A. TQese
ordinance numbers have been changed due to the parliamentary
technicalities and to conform with adjustments being made to the
system of official documentation.
Technically, the motion on the floor after reconsideration of
Ordinance No. 39-92 was to sUbstitute it with two ordinances.
Ordinance No. 39-92 then ceased to exist. The new ordinances,
which included amendments identified by the Council as well as
suggested by the City Attorney became:
*Ordinance No. 41-92, relating to the monthly
salary of the Mayor and Councilmembers
*Ordinance No. 42-92, relating to payments for
attending special meetings of the city Council
and other meetings involving City business.
(This, incidentally, was nearly identical to
Ordinance No. 39-92 as first read.)
Action: The following documents have been prepared for the
Council's consideration:
1) Ordinance No. 41-92 for second reading and
adoption.
2) Ordinance No. 42-92 for second reading and
adoption.
3) Resolution No. 92-234 to authorize the summary of
the ordinances for pUblication.
CWD: jdp
Attachments
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 41-92
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05, SUBDS. 1 AND 2, OF THE CITY
CODE WHICH RELATES TO COMPENSATION FOR THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Section 2.05, Subds. 1 and 2, are hereby
amended to read as follows:
IISECTION 2.05. SALARIES OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
MEMBERS.
Subd. 1. The monthly salary of the Mayor
shall be $500.00 until December 31, 1992, and
shall be $600.00 thereafter.
Subd. 2. The monthly salary of each Council
member shall be $400.00 until December 31,
1992, and shall be $500.00 thereafter.1I
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled IIGeneral Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penal ty for Violation II and Section 2.99, entitled IIViolation a
Misdemeanor ll are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a meeting of the City Council of the City of
Eden Prairie on the J 3th day of October , 1992, and finally
read and adopted and ordered published at a meeting of the City
Council of said City on the 20th day of October , 1992.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
1992. day of
•
-.
•
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 42-92
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05, SUBD. 3, OF THE CITY CODE WHICH
RELATES TO COMPENSATION FOR THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Section 2.05, Subd. 3, is amended to
read as follows:
"SECTION 2.05. SALARIES OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
MEMBERS.
Subd. 3. In addition to the above,
(a) the Mayor and each Council Member shall be paid the
following amounts for attending special meetings of
the Council and other meetings involving City
business: $25.00 for meetings of up to two (2)
hours duration, $50.00 for meetings over two (2)
hours, but not to exceed a maximum amount of $50.00
for any single day. Each such person shall also be
reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred while
attending to business of the City, until
December 31, 1992, and
(b) after December 31, 1992, the Mayor and each Council
member may be paid the following amounts for
attending special meetings of the Council and other
meetings involving City business: $25.00 for
meetings of up to two (2) hours duration, $50.00
for meetings over two (2) hours. Such activities
for which the Mayor or Council members may qualify
to be paid, are limi ted to service as a
representative of the City:
(i) at meetings of boards, committees,
commissions, or other entities of the City, or
of which the City is a member, and which do
not compensate attendees;
(ii) for appearances related to litigation;
(iii) for appearances to testify at the proceedings
of other units of government;
(iv) for out-of-fown travel directly
City business.
-~
~>
relatep to
Each such person shall also be reimbursed for
reasonable expenses incurred while attending
to business of the City."
,)
section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penal ty for Violation" and Section 2.99, entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective from and
after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a meeting of the City Council of
Eden Prairie on the 13th day of October , 1992,
read and adopted and ordered published at a meeting
Council of said City on the 20th day of October
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the
______________ , 1992.
the City of
and finally
of the City
, 1992.
day of
•
•
•
• CITY OF EDEN-PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MlNNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-234
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
Council Compensation
OF ORDINANCE NOS. 41-92 AND 42-92 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARIES
WHEREAS, Ordinance Nos. 41-92 and 42-92 were adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of October, 1992;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the texts of the summaries of Ordinance Nos. 41-92 and 42-92, which are attached hereto,
are approved, and the City Council finds that said texts clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of said
ordinances.
B. That said texts shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than
non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07.
• C. That printed copies of the Ordinances shall be made available for inspection by any person during
regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and copies of the entire texts of the Ordinances shall be
posted in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance Nos. 41-92 and 42-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof
of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication.
AOOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 41-92 and 42-92
ORDINANCES AMENDING SECTION 2.05, SUBDS. 1 and 2, AND SECTION 2.05,
SUBD. 3 OF THE CITY CODE WHICH RELATES TO COMPENSATION FOR THE
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDIANS:
Summary: Ordinance No. 41-92 increases the salary of the Mayor and each Councilmember by
$100 per month.
Ordinance No. 42-92 defines the types of activities or meetings for which the Mayor and
Councilmembers qualify for compensation in addition to their salaries.
These amendments take effect on January 1, 1993.
Effective Date: These Ordinances take effect upon this publication.
ATTEST:
/s/ John D. Frane, City Clerk /s/ Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.)
•
•
•
• Name Change to Cultural C0rilmission
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-235
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY
OF ORDINANCE NO. 38-92 AND ORDERING THE
PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY
,)
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 38-92 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Eden Praiire on the 6th day of October, 1992, and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of October, 1992;
NOW, TIlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE:
A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 38-92, which is attached hereto, is approved,
and the City Council fmds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance.
B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than
non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07.
• C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during
regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted
in the City Hall.
D. That Ordinance No. 38-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of
publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication.
ADOPTED by the City Council on October 20, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
•
Name Change for Cultural Com)nission
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE:-' •
HENNEPIN COUNTY, :MINNFSOTA >\
'J
ORDINANCE NO. 38-92
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, :MINNFSOTA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF
THE CITY CODE CHANGING THE NAl\1E OF THE mSTORICAL AND CULTURAL COIVIMISSION
TO THE CULTURAL COMMISSION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, :MINNFSOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance authorizes a name change from the "Historical and Cultural
Commission" to the "Cultural Commission. "
Effective Date:
ATTEST:
lsI John D. Frane
City Clerk
This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
IslDouglas B. Tenpas
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _______ _
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
•
•
•
•
•
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works
October 15, 1992
Special Assessments for Laseski Property
I.C. 52-069 and I.C. 52-101
.. ;.
'to
In 1987, the City of Eden Prairie held the public hearing for the two projects listed above which
was a storm sewer project and street and utilities for the area south of Riverview Road in the
vicinity of Riverview Drive east and west. The attached letter from the Laseski's gives the
background of the issue from their perspective.
I would take exception to some of the issues raised in the letter, but in general the primary
problem is one which we have dealt with many times in the past --the timing for the Laseski
property is not right for development. The letter raises many issues, but the request is that some
method of deferring the assessment until development be made .
Since this request is consistent with deferments that we have done in similar situations, I would
recommend that the five-year deferments that were granted at time of initial assessment be
extended until development with interest rates accruing as originally approved at the assessment
hearing. The following is a summary of the combined results of such an action:
• The streets were originally assessed in 1987 for collection beginning in 1988 and were
levied at $29,645.71. The Laseski' s have paid off a portion of this assessment on one
of the parcels that they own (they have three all together) and are currently paying on
this assessment. My recommendation would be to leave this amount in place as
originally assessed.
• The sanitary sewer and water laterals were assessed against the three parcels in an
amount of $30,848.71. A five-year deferment was granted at 0% interest. I would
suggest that the deferment continue at 0% interest until development.
• The storm sewer assessment against the three parcels had an original assessed amount of
$79,049.54. A five-year deferment with interest accruing at 8% with a 50% cap on the
interest was granted in 1988. I am recommending that the deferment continue until
development which would result in a maximum assessable amount of $118,574.31.
Special Assessments for Laseski Property
I.C. 52-069 and I.C. 52-101
October 15, 1992
Page 2 of2 ,)
The net result would be that the Laseski's will have paid or will pay a total $179,068.73 plus
trunk sewer and water assessments at prevailing rates when they finally develop the property.
This is a significant amount for a homesteaded property and that is the reason for the request
for deferment. However, the Laseski's do own over 44 acres of property. It is my opinion that
the increased value to the property more than exceeds the amount of the assessments and that
the time for appeal has run. However, Special Assessment Policy No.1 states:
"It is the specific purpose of the City Council to make provisions in the special
assessment proceedings so as to not force a homesteaded property into premature
development or early sale because of an improvement project."
With this policy in mind, I recommend the above noted deferments.
EAD:ssa
•
•
•
•
•
•
City Council of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie City Hall
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
12155 Riverview Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
October 15, 1992
Re: Proposed Special Assessments Hearine on 10/20/92
Dear Council Members:
Eight years ago, when Bluffs Fifth was being developed, the Bluffs Company and
Argus Development, Inc. petitioned the City for improvements along Riverview Road
between Concord Drive and Mooer Lane, a block beyond Bluffs Fifth. Street and
watermains were installed, as well as a storm sewer, and we were assessed about
$140,000 at an annual interest rate of eight percent.
The street and watermains were to prepare for "future" development of the small cul-
de-sac in Bluffs Second which faces Riverview Road, but no plans were in progress at
that time and no development---after eight years---has yet taken place. As I understand
it, soon after completing Bluffs Fifth, Argus Development, Inc. went bankrupt,
bounced back as Joe Miller Homes, and, since that time has had numerous projects
throughout the Twin Cities, as has the Bluffs Company. According to Gene Dietz, the
landfill probably became an issue at some point; but, I assume that these companies did
know that the landfill was there when they petitioned for the improvements.
Recently, I learned that this area in Bluffs Second was sold to Waste Systems; so, it is
unlikely that any development will occur for many more years, if ever.
The background is interesting:
When Bluffs Fifth was getting underway, the developer called us and asked us to
accommodate a holding pond on our property for his run-off. He offered us $50,000
but we refused.
At subsequent council meetings, I was appalled to watch the developer, the Staff, and
the Council, primarily the Assistant Mayor, discuss and diagram, without even
consulting us, the landowners, just where on our property they should put the
developer's holding pond. It appeared that the City planned to just confiscate our land
for the developer's use. These aggressive tactics were intimidating and distracting,
obscuring and thwarting the possibility of other important questions.
Like, why didn't the developer put his holding pond on his own west border? That was
the logical and ethical solution. There was no justification for putting his holding pond
for his development just over the property line onto our side of the fence; except of
course, that it was much more profitable for the developer to use our land and save his
own for residential lots .
A few months ago, I came across a letter and early plans for Bluffs Fifth (in the City 1,
files). The letter (and plans) dated July 26, 1984 from Reike-Carroll-Muller '. •
Associates, Inc. to Mr. Mike Franzen, showed that a holding pond was originally"~-~
desig~ated on the devel.oper' s ow~ property; and, it ~as recommen~~ that a "pipeline~J
be bUllt down to the Mmnesota River---not only to pick up any additIOnal run-off from'
Bluffs Fifth. but to correct a residual. on-going problem in Bluffs Second. and to
prepare for future development. It appears that if it weren't for fixing old problems
and preparing for future development, a holding pond on the developer's own property
would have sufficed.
Incidentally, we had no prior knowledge of the road and water going in; and, as far as
I can determine, this was because the notice read: "For Road and Water Within the '
Bluffs Fifth Addition." The word "within" made the proposal erroneous and
misleading, and effectively eliminated any questions or opposition from us. (Because
of this language, I did not attend the hearing since it appeared to have no effect on our
property).
Recognizing that each new home increases the City's tax base, we expect the City to
have a natural bias toward development; but, there is something terribly wrong with
policies which allow existing homeowners to be recklessly subjected to huge,
unnecessary special assessments.
For instance: If land is platted, a developer can petition for improvements at any time,
even if he has no imminent plans for development and may not even be financially
viable. He could be mentally deranged and still initiate hundreds of thousands of
dollars in improvements.
When large tracts of land border proposed developments, the developer can depend on •
being substantially subsidized with a "benefit package" that is endorsed and enforced by
the City. Because of this, he can afford to have a cavalier attitude toward
improvements when (as in our case) his own investment is relatively insignificant.
Nor does the City require a developer to correct residual problems before moving on to
a new project. Again, in our case, we are being forced to pay for development errors
in Bluffs Second that were made years ago.
We were charged $140,000 at an eight percent annual interest rate: for a storm sewer
that corrected residual problems; and, for street and water improvements that were
unnecessary and premature, that ostensibly went in on a "whim" by companies who
exhibited a preposterous lack of foresight and intelligent planning, one of whom was
not even financially solvent.
From the beginning it seemed that the developer was playing fast and loose with other
people's property and money---with no accountability and no consideration given to the
large debt being placed on existing homeowners.
We derive no benefits from any of these improvements and will not do so until our
property is developed---and we have no idea how many years away that will be. We
believe the City has an ethical obligation to defer all future principal
••
•
•
•
payments on the assessments and eliminate the accrual of interest (including that .
already accrued plus that about to be accrued) until some development tak.~s place along,
that road. ;-". ,}
I will look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely, .
~dL-~e4CL
Kate Laseski
cc: Mr. Carl Julie, City Manager
Mr. John Frane, City Clerk
Mr. Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works
•
•
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 92-230
FAIRFIELD SOUTH
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF FAIRFIELD SOUTH FOR CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Fairfield South for Centex Real Estate Corporation dated October
16, 1992, consisting of 49.9 acres, a copy of which is on me at the City Hall, is found to be in
conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and
amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 20th day of October, 1992.
Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor
ATTEST:
Iohn D. Frane, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNERS:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
Donald R. Uram, Planner
September 25, 1992
Fairfield South
North of County Road 1, west of Braxton Drive
Centex Homes
V & S Enterprises, John Rogers and Independent School District No. 272
1.
2.
Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 16.2 acres and
from Rural to RI-9.5 on 26.6 acres.
Preliminary Plat of 49.9 acres into 94 lots, 4 outlots and road
right-of-way.
•
•
•
•
•
•
SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT
This property is currently guided Low Density Residential and zoned Rural. Adjacent land uses
include the Cedar Ridge Elementary School and Cedar Ridge Estates 2nd Addition, zoned Rl-
13.5 to the east; vacant property, zoned Rural to the west; County Road #1 and large lot single
family development to the south and Fairfield to the north. The current proposal is to develop
the 49.9 acre site into 65 lots zoned Rl-9.5 and 29 lots zoned Rl-13.5. Of the total acreage,
26.6 acres would be zoned RI-9.5 and 16.2 acres would be zoned RI-13.5.
In the RI-9.5 district, 65 lots are proposed ranging in size from a minimum of 10,015 square
feet to a maximum of 38,600 square feet. The average lot size is 14,520 square feet. In the Rl-
13.5 district, lot sizes range from a minimum of 13,520 square feet to a maximum of 48,000
square feet. The average lot size is 18,147 square feet. All of the lots meet the minimum
requirements of the proposed zoning districts.
Based on an acreage of 42.8, the density of the project would be 2.19 units per acre. This is
consistent with the low density guide plan designation.
ACCESS/CIRCULATION
Development of this property requires the extension of Braxton Drive from the northern property
line to County Road #1. The design for Braxton Drive has been completed and is scheduled to
begin construction in the fall of 1992. No direct access is proposed to County Road #1.
The subdivision is designed with a loop street system with access provided to the adjacent
property to the west. The proposed street layout has been reviewed and approved by the adjacent
property owners. A concept plan has been submitted which depicts how this property could be
developed.
GRADING
Elevations on this site range from a high point of 904 along the north and west property lines
to a low point of approximately 873 within the wetland area in the center of the project. The
property is gently rolling with the primary slope towards the pond. The entire site will be
graded to allow for the development of this property. Cut and fill amounts range from
approximately 12 feet of cut along the west property line to approximately 7 feet of fill along
the west side of the wetland area. The wetland area in the northwest comer of the project is
proposed to be relocated to allow for the development of lots on both sides of Street A.
No significant trees exist on the project site. The trees that are on the site are part of an existing
tree farm and will be relocated with this development .
2
WETLANDS ,)
The wetlands on this site are considered "protected" and come under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Natural Resources. The developer is required
to provide documentation from these agencies that the project meets all of their requirements.
The project will also have to meet the requirements of the Riley-Purgatory Watershed District.
For increased wetland protection, the DNR has suggested that a 35 foot rear yard setback be
implemented adjacent to protected wetlands. Staff recommends that the preliminary plat be
revised to reflect this suggestion.
TRANSITION
The RI-9.5 lots are platted along Braxton Drive, County Road #1 and the west property line.
For transition purposes, Staff is recommending that a berming and landscaping plan be developed
along County Road #1 similar to what has been done in other subdivisions. The developer may
also wish to provide some type of buffer along Braxton Drive.
The property to the west of this project is guided for low density residential and could be
expected to develop as RI-13.5 lots. Because of this, Staff recommends that the lot sizes and
dimensions along the west property line be consistent with the RI-13.5 zoning requirements .
ARCHITECTURAL DIVERSITY PLAN
In all RI-9.5 zoning areas, an architectural diversity plan is required. This plan keys specific
unit types to each lot so that no two units would be alike side by side, opposite or diagonally
across from each other. Prior to Council review, an architectural diversity plan shall be
submitted.
UTILITIES
Sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service is available to this site. Proposed sanitary sewer
and water is available within Braxton Drive with extensions made throughout the project site.
Utilities service will be provided to the west and south properties.
Storm water run-off is proposed to be collected throughout the project site within ponding areas
and discharged into the main wetland area. Detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion
control plans must be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed
District.
3
•
•
•
•
•
•
PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS/OPEN SPACE -~ --~
-,
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department has recommended that sidewalks should
be included on all streets within the subdivision with the exception of the cul-de-sac.
Connections will be made to a 5 foot concrete sidewalk and an 8 foot bituminous trail which will
be constructed along Braxton Drive.
STAFF RECOl\1MENDA TIONS
If the Planning Commission feels that the size and location of the proposed RI-9.5 subdivision
is acceptable, the appropriate action is to recommend approval of the request by Centex for
Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 16.2 acres and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 26.6
acres and Preliminary Plat of 49.9 acres into 94 lots, 4 outlots and road right-of-way based on
plans dated September 11, 1992 and revised plans dated September 25, 1992 and subject to the
recommendations in the Staff Report dated September 25, 1992, and subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall:
A. Provide an architectural diversity plan for RI-9.5 lots .
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H .
Submit documentation from the Department of Natural Resources, the Watershed
District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that the project meets their
requirements.
Submit a detailed transition plan for benning and landscaping along Co. Rd. #1.
Revise the preliminary plat to reflect sidewalks along all of the streets with the
exception of cul-de-sac "D".
Revise the preliminary plat to reflect lots along the west property line which meet
the RI-13.5 requirements.
Revise the preliminary plat to reflect a 35 foot minimum rear yard setback for
those lots adjacent to the wetland areas.
Revise the utility plan to reflect the extension of utilities to serve the property
south of County Road # 1.
Revise the grading and utility plan to reflect the current preliminary plat.
4
2210
2. Prior to final plat approval proponent shall:
A. Provide detailed storm water run-off, erosion control plans for review and
approval by the Watershed District.
B. Provide detailed storm water run-off utility and erosion control plans for review
and approval by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall:
A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading.
B. Stake construction limits with erosion control fencing.
4. Prior to building permit issuance proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate Cash Park Fee.
B. Insure compliance with the architectural control policy.
5. A special assessment agreement for Braxton Road is required.
FFSOUTH.DRU
5
\
., '1 "''''I ! __ .. -I 1
•
•
•
-
i
I 1.
I
i
I •
i
i
I
I.
CENITEXHoN~S--------
Designed for today. Built for tomorrow.
FAIRFIELD SOUTH
Centex Real Estate Corporation
August 13, 1992
Centex Real Estate Corporation ("Centex") is requesting City of Eden
Prairie review and approval of re-zoning and preliminary plat of 94 single family
lots to be known as FAIRFIELD SOUTH. This site is immediately south of our
existing Fairfield project and west of proposed Braxton Drive. Centex intends to
develop the lots in 1993 thru 1994 and construct "For Sale" single family homes
similar to those currently being sold in our Fairfield and Fairfield Estates
neighborhood.
The site consists of approximately 50 acres of land currently under
contract for purchase by Centex. Approximately 6 acres of wetland exist on the
site with the balance being agricultural (including some nursery trees) use and
the John Roger's residence, which will remain. No significant trees exist on the
site exclusive of the Roger's yard. The site has considerable rolling topography
with a high elevation of 905 feet near the north and west sides of the property
to a low elevation of 873 feet at the central wetland basin. There are some
slopes in excess of 12% around the wetland basins. These slopes are currently
tilled and planted annually by the farmers.
The City guide plan designation for this site is low density (0 -2.5
DulAC). The proposed gross density will be under 2.0 DulAC which is consistent
with the guide plan. The current zoning is rural. The proposed zoning is R1 -
13.5 on the northwestern portions of the site and Rl -9.5 On the southeastern
portions. See preliminary plat for lot sizes, zoning district boundaries and
acreage and densities. These lot sizes are consistent with the existing FAIRFIELD
P.U.D. No variances from the zoning district standards are requested. The R1 -
9.5 lots will be subject to the same architectural standards as are in force in
FAIRFIELD regarding the proximity of similar plans from each other.
----Ba~er Technology Plaza, 5929 Baker Road, Suite 470, Minnetonka, Minnesota 553451 (612) 936-7833----
Builders License #0001333 '7'1 -'1 ',' FAX (612) 936-7839
;-"-, ~-
OUtlots are proposed along the western boundary of the property to allow
for inclusion in future development westward.
The proposed development will likely be covered by covenants and
restrictions similar to those used in the Fairfield and Fairfield Estates
neighborhood. A copy of these documents are available upon request.
Entry signage similar in nature to that done with the Fairfield development
is anticipated. Specific design of monuments, signage and plantings will be done
prior to final construction.
The proposed development will generate approximately 940 trips per day.
These trips will generally be to and from Braxton Road and then either to county
Road 1 or Scenic Heights Road.
A level I Environmental Assessment is currently being prepared by Westwood
Professional Services and is anticipated to be complete by early September 1992.
Centex has no knowledge of any wells, tanks, dump sites or other possible
contamination on the site.
LETTER\db\ffaouth/cd
•
-.
•
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Donald R. Uram, Planner
THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning
DATE: September 25, 1992
SUBJECT: "Starter" Housing in the RI-9.5 Zoning District
INTRODUCTION
The original intent of the RI-9.5 Zoning District, which allows for a minimum lot size of 9,500
square feet and a frontage of 75 feet, was to provide the opportunity for construction of smaller
and less expensive starter homes for first time buyers. Adopting the smaller lot size was
partially in response to rising interest rates on home mortgages in the early 1980's. It also
allowed for a more efficient use of the land without significantly increasing housing densities as
with multiple family projects. The RI-9.5 district was intended to provide an "affordable"
alternative between the larger RI-13.5 district lots and multiple family lots.
Since the late 1980's, however, larger more expensive homes that were typically found in Rl-
13.5 neighborhoods have been constructed within the RI-9.5 District. The advantages to the
developer by platting RI-9.5 lots verses RI-13.5 lots are as follows:
1. Minimum lot size of 9,500 square feet compared to 13,500 square feet.
2. Minimum lot frontage of 70 feet compared to 85 feet.
3. Minimum side yard setbacks of 5 feet on the garage side for a total of 15 feet compared
to a minimum of 10 feet for a total of 25 feet.
By using the RI-9.5 zoning district, approximately two additional lots can be platted for every
1,000 linear feet while still allowing for the construction of the same size home. For example,
on a 75 foot wide lot with a 15 foot total setback, a 60 foot wide house can be built. The same
applies to an 85 foot wide lot with a 25 foot total setback. As this illustrates, the same size
home can be built in both zoning districts but with a reduction in lot frontage of 10 feet in the
RI-9.5 District.
In reviewing the following information, the Planning Commission should consider whether the
Rl-9.5 Zoning District is still appropriate for use in providing" starter" housing or should other
alternatives be considered .
1
1988 RI-9.S ZONING DISTRICT ANALYSIS
In 1988, Staff did an analysis of the existing RI-9.5 projects in the City (see Attachmenf,A).
The study concluded that each of the 21 RI-9.5 projects in Eden Prairie could be placed in ~ee
categories based on average home market values: .
1. Projects where average home values ($84,833 -$103,275) were affordable to first
time buyers according to FHA mortgage limits.
2. Projects where the average home value ($106,512 -$129,042) is above FHA
mortgage limits but are available to first time home buyers with incomes at the
upper end of the first buyer market.
3. Projects that have homes with average values ($142,814 -$186,073) significantly
higher than the other projects.
Staff concluded then that 17 of the 21 (80%) existing RI-9.5 projects fit into categories one and
two and conceivably met the Council's original intent.
•
The 1988 memo used the FHA maximum mortgage limit as a "generic" affordability index. In
1988, this figure was $101,250 and has since been raised to $110,000. Using the 1988 figure,
twelve of the twenty-one RI-9.5 projects had average home values at or near this limit. A
recent analysis of four additional RI-9.5 has revealed that none of the more recently approved
projects would meet the FHA "generic" affordability index (see Attachment B). For example, •
the more recent projects have average home values ranging from a minimum of $115,500 for
the Zachman Brothers Addition to a maximum of $163,981 for Woodland Ponds.
Using these numbers, only the Zachman Brothers Addition would be considered affordable
according to the previous criteria. The other three projects would fit into category three which
was considered unaffordable for first time home buyers.
CURRENT SALE PRICES
To get a more accurate picture of the housing prices in the RI-9.5 district, Staff reviewed and
analyzed the sale prices of all of the RI-9.5 lots in the following subdivisions (see Attachments
C and D):
1. Fairfield
2. Glenshire
3. Round Lake View
4. Woodland Ponds
5. Wyndham Nob 2nd
6. Zachman Brothers
2
~) .,,~ "1.(-.. ~ ............. ; ,,_,:,
•
•
•
•
In Centex's Fairfield subdivision, the City has sales data on 95 lots. The sale prices ranged
from a low of $118,655 to a high of $263,380. TPe average sale price was $162,577. As these
figures indicate, they are substantially higher than the current FHA mortgage limit. Sales pri.ces
in the other subdivisions ranged from a low of $104,000 in the Zachman Brothers AdditioI)'\to
a high of $254;480 in Woodland Ponds. Woodland Ponds also had the highest average sale
price at $186,845.
For comparison purposes, Staff also reviewed and analyzed the sale prices of the homes in
Fairfield zoned RI-13.5 (see Attachment E). In this area, the prices ranged from a low
$169,000 to a high of $273,375. The average sale price in the RI-13.5 district was $203,226.
A comparison of the prices in the Rl-9.5 and the Rl-13.5 Districts is as follows:
FAIRFIELD Rl-13.S Rl-9.S Difference
Low $169,000 $118,655 $ 50,345
High $273,375 $263,380 $ 9,995
Average $203,226 $162,577 $ 40,649
Comparing these two figures, the average home sale price in the RI-13.5 district is
approximately $40,000 higher than the average in the RI-9.5 district. Based on these numbers,
it appears that the Fairfield subdivision is providing housing alternatives for two distinct
segments of the market.
BUILDING SIZE VERSUS LOT SIZE
Lastly, a comparison was done between building square footage and lot size in the Fairfield
subdivision by zoning district. The results are as follows:
BLDG. SIZE Rl-13.S Rl-9.S Difference
Low 2,267 1,365 902
High 3,107 2,970 137
Average 2,595 2,220 375
WT SIZE Rl-13.5 Rl-9.S Difference
Low 13,000 9,614 3,386
High 29,700 28,693 1,007
Average 16,048 14,406 1,642
3
As these figures 'indicate, 'building square footage and lot sizes tend to be smaller in the RI-9J
District than in the RI-13.5 District. This tendeqcy is reflected in the sales prices of the homes •
in each ·of the two zoning districts'. .. '" :."
)" , .... -1"--,-. ';'-' -~. ,.' , -'-;',,' '\ .. ;. ::i:; :, ':::. ,., .... :.. " .. ' . . ,'. ' ;. -;/
The following charts compare the building and lot sizes in five other recently approved RI-9.5
subdivisions to those in Fairfield:
.• -' . , ,
BLDG. SIZE Fairfield 9.5 Other 9.5 Difference
Low ' '-1,365'" '\ , ., . 936 429
High 2,970 2,557 413
Average 2,220 1,700 520
WTSIZE Fairfield 9.5 Other 9.5 Difference
-
Low 9,614 8,500 1,114
_ .. .-" -:-28,693'-'~~_c" -'--.' .-." -,,-
High 35~2oo .' (6,507)
Average 14,406 12,727 1,679
As these numbers indicate, Centex homes are typically larger and are constructed on larger lots. " •
This supports the idea that limiting building and lot size may help to reduce cost.
CONCLUSIONS
After reviewing all of the data, Staff has concluded the following about the RI-9.5 Zoning
District:
1. The average prices of homes have increased since 1988.
2. Both building square footage and lot sizes have increased.
3. There is a significant difference in sales prices between this district and the Rl-
13.5 District in the Fairfield subdivision.
4. Homes constructed in this district are serving a market segment as evidenced by
the number of sales.
5. Building square footage seems to be the primary determinate of cost.
6. In its current form, this district is not providing "starter" housing as determined
by the FHA mortgage limit.
4 •
•
•
•
" '"7. . . One· way to address the affordability issue would be to limit maximum builditi
. square footage to an absolute number such as 1,200 square feet rather than a
_. , . , . percentage of the lot size. This may work better when paired with a new sm~ler
b~ . . "' j
. I I r ~ I r";' ";,,. _ . , .,.. .... ~ ,',... ..... .. <:.. . . _.. _; ," '. . . .:. .. _'. • .' _
ALTERNATIVES
Based on"' " the above -conclusions, -the" following alternatives . are-:preSeotea" to the Planning
Commission in response to whether the Rl-9.5 district is still a viable tool for helping the City
achieve affordable housing:
1. The City could continue using the Rl-9.5 district as it is currently being used. This
would be with the understanding that it is not providing "starter" housing as determined
2.
3.
4.
5.
••• ~_'.~._ ••• "4~ _: ••• ~-.:c.::. _ ..... -
by the FHA mortgage limits but that it is serving a distinct market segment that is not
being met in the Rl-13.5 district.
The City could limit the building square footage of the homes in an attempt to reduce
costs. -For"exampfe, in theRI-9.5 district a FAR of 15% is allowed for a one-story
building and 25% for a multi-story building. Based on a.9,500 square foot lot, a 1,425
square foot one-story building and a 2,375 square foot multi-storied building could be
constructed. However, the" average lot size in the Fairfield RI-9.5 district is 14,406
square feet. Because of this, larger homes can be constructed which increase the sale
price. To be more effective, the percentage of building coverage must be decreased, the
size of the lots limited (#3) or the size of the home limited.
The City could limit the size of the lots. For example, a maximum lot size of 12,000
square feet could be allowed in the RI-9.5 Zoning District. Together with a maximum
building square footage, this would help to reduce the size of the homes thereby reducing
costs. One disadvantage of this alternative is that the design of the subdivision may be
more difficult because of the restricted lot size.
The City could create a new zoning district which establishes a smaller lot size. For
example, the City may wish to create an RI-7.5 Zoning District which would allow for
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet and a reduced lot frontage. In order for this
district to be successful, strict design guidelines would have to be established so that the
subdivision would not appear "cluttered" and that the living spaces are habitable.
The City could eliminate the R 1-9.5 Zoning District saying that the district is not able
to provide "starter" housing as determined by the City. A major disadvantage of
eliminating this district is that housing costs would increase according to the market.
Increased housing costs will not benefit Eden Prairie.
5
Rather than eliminate the Rl-9.5 Zoning District, which does not seem to be in the City's b~~c
interest, Staff recommends a combination of .alternatives #2, #3 and #4. By limited lot size
together with a maximum building square footage, it seems likely that sales prices could. be
reduced below their current levels. This would help to address the "starter" housing issu~J
". '\'-
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
o '0 7. "0 ° . One way to address the affordability issue would be to limit maximum building
° square footage to an absolute nUIJ1ber such as 1,200 square feet rather than a
-: '-. . percentage of the lot size. This may work better when paired with a new sniciJler
lot size. _.: o~o ,)
. ,'I r ~
ALTERNATIVES
Based ooo'°the above °conclusions~ -the-following alternatives are ""'preSenteo" to the Planning
Commission in response to whether the RI-9.5 district is still a viable tool for helping the City
achieve affordable housing:
1. The City could continue using the RI-9.5 district as it is currently being used. This
would be with the understanding that it is not providing "starter" housing as determined
2.
3.
4.
5.
by the FHA mortgage limits but that it is serving a distinct market segment that is not
being met in the RI-13.5 district.
The City could limit the building square footage of the homes in an attempt to reduce
costs .. For" exampie, in1lieR.I-9.5 district a FAR of 15% is allowed for a one-story
building and 25% for a multi-story building. Based on a o9,500 square foot lot, a 1,425
square foot one-story building and a 2,375 square foot multi-storied building could be
constructed. However, the average lot size in the Fairfield RI-9.5 district is 14,406
square feet. Because of this, larger homes can be constructed which increase the sale
price. To be more effective, the percentage of building coverage must be decreased, the
size of the lots limited (#3) or the size of the home limited.
The City could limit the size of the lots. For example, a maximum lot size of 12,000
square feet could be allowed in the RI-9.5 Zoning District. Together with a maximum
building square footage, this would help to reduce the size of the homes thereby reducing
costs. One disadvantage of this alternative is that the design of the subdivision may be
more difficult because of the restricted lot size.
The City could create a new zoning district which establishes a smaller lot size. For
example, the City may wish to create an RI-7.5 Zoning District which would allow for
a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet and a reduced lot frontage. In order for this
district to be successful, strict design guidelines would have to be established so that the
subdivision would not appear "cluttered" and that the living spaces are habitable.
The City could eliminate the RI-9.5 Zoning District saying that the district is not able
to provide "starter" housing as determined by the City. A major disadvantage of
eliminating this district is that housing costs would increase according to the market.
Increased housing costs will not benefit Eden Prairie .
5
Rather thin eliminate the Rl-9.5 Zoning District, which does not seem to be in the City's b~~<
interest, Staff recommends a combination of ,alternatives #2, #3 and #4. By limited lot siie •
togetherii.ri.th a maximum building square footage, it seems likely that sales prices could, be
reduced' below their current levels. This would help to address the "starter" housing issu~J-
'\ '. ":" ... -... -. ~." .
'.: r"; • -_ •.• ; r
.. '
•
6 •
•
•
•
MEMO
.... ,... !" ~ ~ • ~ "', .• ~. \
TO:
FROM:
THifOUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
~ajbr ,and City Counc i 1
• , ~. ," I. ~ _ . . -_ .. "
David Lindahl, Assistant Planner
Chris Enger, Director of Planning
September 15, 1988
ANALYSIS OF THE RI-9.5 ZONING DISTRICT
,--
.. ~
~ .
Planning Staff has-conducted an analysis of all RI-9.5 projects in Eden Prairie in
order to determine whether the 9.5 District is meeting the intent as adopted by the
Council in 1982.
The original purpose of the RI-9.5 District, which allows a minimum lot size of
9,500 square feet, was to provide the opportunity for construction of smaller and
less expensive starter homes for first time buyers. Adopting the smaller lot size
district was partially in response to rising interest rates on home mortgages in the
early 1980's, which made it difficult for first time buyers to purchase single
family homes. It also allowed for a more efficient use of land, without
significantly increasing housing densities as with multiple family projects. The
9.5 District would provide a "happy median" between the larger RI-13.5 District lots
and multiple family lots.
Recentl y, however, 1 arger more expens i ve "move-up" homes are bei ng constructed
within RI-9.5 Districts, homes that are typically found in Rl-13.5 neighborhoods.
Figure 1 on page 4, is a spreadsheet which lists each project by name and indicates
the year approved, acreage, number of lots, density, low and high range market
values,--average market ~alues, and the developer and builders of all 21 approved RI-
9.5 projects in Eden Prairie.--'Figure -2 on page 5 is a ma-p showing the location of
each project. -
A wide range of market values were discovered in all 21 projects. Woodlawn Heights,
project #3 located in Northwest Eden Prairie, had the lowest valued home at $71,500,
while Canyon Ridge, project #16, had the highest valued home at $212,500.
The current maximum F.H.A. mortgage for single family homes in the Metropolitan area
is $101,250. If this is used as a first time buyer market affordability index, 12
of the 21 existing R1-9.5 projects, or 57%, have average home values below or close
to $101,250.
However, an affordability range for first time buyers is difficult to confirm when
the socio-economic framework of this market is continually changing. It is more
common today for young families to have combined incomes, which is increasing the
buying threshold of this group. Eden Prairie is also attracting higher income
buyers in all markets.
Builders are responding to these changes by offering a variety of housing styles and
Attachment A
Memo September 15, 1988
prices. They are now attempting to capture the upper end of the starter markit by
offering a unique product that is ch~racterized by distinctive architectura.
features, e.g., increased roof pitch, half moon windows, etc., while maintaining th
-size normal for this market (950 -1100 square feet). ;~ :)
The first builder to implement this approach in Eden Prairie was Centex Homes in the
Ridgewood West S'ubdivision. See Figure 1, project #17. The home values found in
Ridgewood West range from a low of $74,900 to a high of $127,200, with an average of
$98,931. This is nearly $13,000 less than the $111,724 average for all 21 projects.
The location of RI-9.S subdivisions seems to influence the size and cost of homes
within these projects. RI-9.5 projects that are developed adjacent to larger lot,
"move-up" subdivisions, or next to several natural amenities, allows builders to
construct the largest homes possible as permitted by Code. These units have sold
well due to a strong "move up" buyer market in Eden Prairie in the last several
years. This occurred in the Canyon Ridge Subdivision which has a value range from
$143,000 to $212,SOO, and an average home value of $180,673. Canyon Ridge is
directly adjacent to a pond, and to the Red Rock Heights Subdivision, which has an
average value of $160,000.
Lot configurations within RI-9.S subdivisions limits the size, and influences the
style of homes built in these projects. This is evident in subdivisions which have
cluster lots; Ridgewood West, Apple Groves, and Mark Charles Addition, projects 17,
9, and 21. Because the size and configuration of cluster lots prohibits the
construction of conventional homes, creative designs and floor elevations are
necessary in these cases. This combined with the City's architectural review of all
, RI-9.5 projects has resulted in some attractive and unique subdivisions. '
Although cluster lots yield higher densities, they have less visual impact \'-Ihe.
developed within larger P.U.D.'s with overall densities of 2.5 units per acre or
less. Approximately half of all the existing RI-9.5 projects were approved through
a P.U.D.
The maximum density allowed by Code within the RI-9.5 district, without a variance,
is 3.S u./a. Since the maximum density for areas guided Low Density Residential is
2.5 u./a., RI-9.5 projects with densities above this must be located within RM areas
of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Map. Otherwise the Guide Plan must be changed upon
request to allow RI-9.S zoning. There are currently 6 projects within areas
designated RM on the Guide Plan Map. All the others are either part of a P.U.D.,
or mixed in with larger Rl-13.5 lots with an overall density less than 2.5 u./a.
The 21 Rl-9.S projects approved to date in Eden Prairie could be placed into three
categories, based on average home market values:
1. Projects where average home values are affordable to first time buyers
according to F.H.A. mortgage limits. $84,833 -$103,375 (57~). These
projects meet the original intent of the Rl-9.5 District, and are
characteristic of the traditional first time buyer neighbhorhoods; standard
split levels and ramblers.
2. Projects where th: ave~age home v~lue is above F.H.A. mortgage limits, but
are availabe to flrst tlme buyers wlth incomes at the "upper end" of the
first buyer market~ $106,512 -$~2g,042 (24~n. These are projects VI.'
homes which are archltecturally unlque and are more conducive to "lifest
•
•
•
Memo
3.
September 15, 1988
desires." These projects conceivably meet the intent of the 9.5 Oist~Jct.
Projects that because of their p~oximity to expensive "move-up" subdivisions
and -natural 'ameniti es, have homes with average values .S:,j gnifi cantl y\ hi gher
than the other projects, $142,814 -$180,673 (19%). Th~se projects~have not
met the intent of the District.
Approximately 80% of all existing R1-9.5 projects fit into category 1 and 2, and
conceivably meet the Council's original intent. Location of RI-9.5 developments
apparently determines the size and cost of homes constructed within these projects.
If this district is eliminated from the Code, the smallest lot size allowed in Eden
Prairie will be in the RI-13.5 District, which based on a random sample of 30
projects has a 1988 average market home value of $155,389. See Figures 3 and 4 on
pages 5 and 6.This is $43,665 more than the $111,724 average value of all existing
RI-9.5 projects.
"J "."'~ -~
r:-4
ISJ
" -C>
C
JJ m
~
:PROJECT:
: 1. D. , ,
:HUI1BER : PROJECT NAME
: YEARS I
EDEN PRAIRIE RI-9.5 ZONINS DISTRICT ANALYSIS
(EIISTING RI-9.S PROJECTS I
: TOTAl: : PUD : LOll
: SECTION: SECTOR :APPROYED : ACREAGE: LOTS: DENSITY:DENSITY: RANGE
1988 HARKET VALUES
HISH
RANGE , AYERA6E : DEYELOPERS ' , BUILDERS
'f ••• f •• :f.ff.ff.ffff ••••• f •• :f •• f.ffff:.f.f ••• ff'f •• ffffff'lfl.lf.f'f.ff.II'ff.'.'ff' •• '.I.':ff.lf.lf'ff •• 'f ••••• fl.lllf'.I.lllfffffll'I •••• I.IIII.lli.li.I'I •••••• ''If'I ••• I''' •• f.
. 1 :HIDDEN GLEN
~ --: DELLWOOD
.3 -:WDODLAWN HEIGHTS
4 :TIMBER CREEK WOODS
5 :EDENYALE'18
6 :EDENYALE 19
1--:EDENVALE 21 -
8 -:~UIRFIELD
9 :APPLE GROVE, 1
10 :APPLE 6ROVES II
11 :PAULsEN's II
12 :A!JTUtlN WOODS
13 IPRAIRIE KNOLL
14 :6LENSHIRE
15 IVALLEY CURVE
16 -:CAHYON RID6E
17 :RID6EWOOD WEST
-IS-:DEERCREEKII--
19 :WESTOVER WOODS
20 :SLUFFS EAST
21 :MARK CHARLES ADD.
No ' :
56
NS
N&S5
N4
Nt
N4
Nn8
N7
N7
Nl
N7
N9
N9
NI0
516
N22
515
N22
525
525
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
2
1
1
3
4
4
12
12
12
12
13
13
1983
1984
1986
1983
1981
1983
1984
1984
1987
1984
1993
1983
1983
1984
1984
1985
1984
1989
1983
1984
1983
1984
1985
1987
1986
1983
1983
41.5 135
22.5 71
49.5 139
21. 7 I 71
2.8 : 10
9 , 17 ,
5.3 : 17:
18 I 55 :
13 : 57 :
4.8 I 1 ~ , .J ,
8.2 , . 24 :
15 I 40 :
22.4 : 54 :
17.3 I 56 I
3~ , .J , 77:
7.4 : 20 :
33.8 : 134 :
12.6 : 31 :
4 I 16 :
35: 110
6.3: 28
5.2 2.5 I
3.1 N/A
2.6 N/A
3.2 0.96
3.5 N/A
1.6 N/A
3.2 N/A
3 3.3
4.5 3.9
3.1 3.9
2.5 IN/A
3 IN/A
2.4 : 2.8 :
3.2 I N/A
2.2 : N/A :
2.7 : N/A :
5.9 : 3.5 :
2.95 : 2.4 I
4 : 3 :
3.1: N/A I
4.4: 5.3:
$77,200
$79,300
m,500
$84,200
$78,700
$116,700
$152,300
$84,100
$75,600
S81,OOO
562,500
5113,500 :
f101,OOO I
N/A
$72,800 :
$143,000 :
$74,900 :
$105,100 :
$18,000 :
S78,400 I
$77,800 :
$139,600
$lS3,300
$121,700
$159,000
$105,200
$178,300
$196,600
$132,600
$108,500
$137,100
$128,100
SI65,600 :
$146,000 :
N/A
$116,500 :
$212,500 :
m7,200 :
5121,600 I
$l50,200 I
Sl32,400
5121,700
$94,680 FEERICK FRONTIER/NEW CONCEPT
J.B. FRANKLIN
,.
$101,250 TAN DEli r' -SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION
$84,833 LYIIAN LU~BER ECKLUND/SWEDLUND
$128,120 B-1 LAND CO. VARIOUS
$85,850 EVUITABLE LIFE " HIPPS
$142,814 EQUITABLE lIFE T&E CONSTRUCTION
$174,450 BRECO CORP. T&E CONSTRUCTION
$101,497 I TAHDE~ SUljSHINE CONST.
$88,586 : NORIH~ESTER~ PROP. ZACHMAN BROS.
$103,375 I NORTHWESTERN PROP. I NEW A~ERICHN/ZACHMAN
595,276 I DIRLAH DEVELOPMENT I VARIOUS
$129,042 : TRUHPY TRUMPY HOliES
Sl06,512 : HEST! A HOMES , HESUA HOI1ES ' ,
N/A ASS. INYEST"ENTS TRI-CON
$89,731: RE61STERED PROP. ZACHMAN/NOYAK/VARIOUS
$180,673 : KERR cor.FANY YARIOUS
$98,931 : CENTEI CENTEX
$115,300 I T.II. CARMODY TRI-CON
S120,277 : TANDEM VARIOUS
$96,966
$97,317
HUSTAD ~ ~:9UALITY HO"ES/RICH."ILLE~ . ~"J HARK CHARLES CO.: MMRK CHMRLES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS -385 1183
PRICE LIHIT FOR MHFA FIRST TIME HOllE BUYER PR06RAH:
HEW SIN6LE FAMILY $89,000
EXISTIN6 SIN6LE FAMILY -179,000
"AIIMJIIIIt 1I0RTGAGE -$101,250
AVERA6E DENSITY -3.5 3.2
AVERAGE VALUES -
•
HO,380 $142,685 '111,724
0(
~),.I'
\
•
l ,
•
FOR ALL AREAS PRESENTLY ZONED R1-9.S
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FIGURE 2
'2L~'Ll
-.. -~-.~. -. __ ...... _ . .----'--~ '., .. ,-.-., ,,EDEN PRAIRIE Rl-Jl.5 ZONINSDISTRICT ANALYSIS •. 'i.f;, -. -_. "'-'. tty • . --. -----.; --0:(1988 MARKET VALUESFOR 30 RI-13.5 PROJECTS SELECTED AT RANDOI1) '.~ :.~-
'"~ .-..' .-,) --.---.-......... -.... _--~---:-..... , "-'-.-._-
~;.--' , . -.
PROJECT ,TOTAL
I. D. NEISHBORHOOD I1ARKET TOTAL AVERAGE
NUMBER NUroBER SECTION SECTOR VALUE UNITS VALUE PROJECT NAME
Iltlttltllllttlitltltfllttlltlfltflttltttttltttttltllll1IIIItlltttttlflifi fttllltt't'tll'lftlftffft
1 1416 !f36 13 $2,370,700 8 $296,338 BLUFFS WEST 6TH
2 2106 1136 13 $248,000 2 $124,000 PRAIRIE BLUFF
3 1507 N35 13 $12,114,800 135 $89,739 BLUFFS WEST 7TH
4 ,·1506 N35 13 $14,044,400 142 $98,904 BLUFFS WEST
5 1509 H35 13 $2,490,500 21 $118,595 BLUFFS WEST 5TH
6 1414 1135 13 $16,397,800 75 $218,637 BLUFFS WEST
7 1413 S2b 13 $4,310,800 32 $134,713 HILLSBOROUGH
8 1504 526 13 $10,046,500 112 $89,701 HILLSBOROU6H
9 1502 H26 13 $6,377,900 54 '. ,$119,109 CREEKWOOD
10 1307 S25 13 $10,103,200 85 $118,861 PRAIRIE EAST
11 -,1310 S25 13 $7 ,374,100 69 $106,871 PRAIRIE EAST
12 1312 S25 13 $4,733,500 51 $92,814 PRAIRIE EAST
13 1307 N25 11 $7,984,900 53 $150,658 PRAIRIE EAST
14 1402 N25 11 $9,890,900 30 $329,697 OLYMPIC HILLS 7TH • 15 1407 N25 11 $5,482,900 26 $210,881 OLYMPIC HILLS 4TH
16 1408 N25 11 H,095,800 16 $255,989 OLYMPIC HILLS 5TH
17 1218 N24 11 $8,277,200 34 $243,441 HIDDEN OAKS
18 1214 S23 11 $7,235,500 41 $176,476 MEADOW PARK
19 1209 N23 11 $6,007,300 43 $139,705 EDEN LAKE NORTH 20 ,.--"'802 N17 15 $13,104,000 7b $172,421 TIMBER LAKES
21 906 S16 12 $10,111,000 78 $129,629 RED ROCK HIllS 22 913 SIb 12 $11,761,200 82 $143,429 COACHI1ANS 23 414 N9 2 $3,385,000 34 $99,559 DUCK LAKE VISTA 24 515 S6 1 $5,852,100 40 $146,303 THE FARH 25 304 S5 1 $6,093,100 35 $173,803 HIDDEN RIDSE ESTATES 26 407 S5 1 $11,060,800 110 $100,553 HIGH TRAILS ESTATES 27 402 N5 1 $7,344,600 48 $153,013 CHATHAI1 WOODS 28 401 H5 1 $3,389,200 23 $147,357 PURGATORY RID6E 29 112 N2 7 $10,755,000 66 $162,955 CARMEL 30 113 N2 7 $592,600 5 $l1B,520 RASBERRY HILL
----------------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------------
TOTALS -$223,025,300 1626 $155,389
•
FIGURE 3
6 '"} -, ~j<:
.. :-,... C....>
--_ ........ --•• -......... III .W.~I
FOR ALL AREAS PRESENTLY ZONED R1-13.5
• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
FIGURE 4
7 '22Z6
,,j
t~
~
-..j
~
rT
rT
PI
()
::r'
ffi ::s
rT
to
!
'"Jeot N.~ ••••• i:;:i ... ill j;;;;.w...r VAUJESii·i.\ ,i ..
Hidden Glen I 1983-86 I 139 I $ 77,200 $ 84,200 ! $139,600 $148,800 $ 94,680 . ; $108,532 ,
Dellwood 1983 71 79,300 82,500 ' 153,300 155,600 10",250 . "0,585
~oodland Heights 1981 137 71 500 75 100 121 700 123 800 84 833 .\ 99,127
Timber Creek ~oods 1983 75 84,200 93,900 ' 159,000 172,300 128,120 133,836
Edenvale 18 I 1984 I 10 78,700 79,000 105,200 101,400 85,850 90.800
Edenvale 19 I 1984 I 17 116,700 100,200 178,300 201,400 142,814 I 140,712
Edenvale 21 I 1987 4 152 300 164 000 196,600 232 600 174,450 J 164.000 :
Huirfield 1984 59 84,100 85,900 132,600 128,900 101,487 I 107.466
Apple Groves I 1983 66 75,600 80,200 108.500 126.600 88.586 I 99.758
Paulsen's" 1983 16 62,500 93,600 128,100 119,300 95,276 105,063
AutUTTI ~oods I 1984 45 113 500 103 200 165 600 213,200 129 042 144 444
Prairie Knoll I 1984 47 101,000 97,000 146,000 174,300 106.512 135.591
Glenshire I 1988 15 N/A 116,900 N/A 173,100 N/A 149,045
Valley Curve 1983 78 72,800 82,700 116,500 127,000 88,731 102,806
Scenic Heights ~est 1984 15 143 000 157.000 212 500 236,100 180 673 182,760
Ridgewood \Jest 1983 152 74,900 81,700 127,200 147 900 98,931 106,970
Deercreek II 1987 24 105,100 95,900 121,600 152,800 115,300 117,713
~estover ~oods 1986 20 78,000 89,400 150,200 155,900 120,277 128,625
Bluffs East 1983 97 78 400 84 100 132,400 157 700 96966 104.797
Hark Charles Add. 1983 22 77,800 84,700 121,700 125,500 97,317 ;.'~ 102,368
~oodland Ponds 1989 16 N/A 140,500 N/A 201,200 N/A 163,981
~ndham Nob 2nd 1988 5 90,380 100,400 142,000 177,200 111,724 144,380
Zachman Bros. Add. 1989 14 N/A 96,700 N/A 131 700 N/A 115 500
~ .
Fairfield I 1988 95 N/A 103,200 N/A 217,600 N/A c,J __ 1~,311
• • ".
•
•
•
FAIRFIELD Rl-9.S
SALES COMPARISON
P.I.D.
1 20-116-22-12-0037
2 20-116-22-12-0050
3 -" -20-116-22-12-0062
4 20-116-22-11-0069
5 20-116-22-11-0068
6 20-116-22-12-0038
7 20-116-22-12-0065
8 20-116-22-12-0058
9 20-116-22-12-0032
10 20-116-22-12-0092
11 20-116-22-12-0034
12 20-116-22-11-0067
13 20-116-22-12-0033
14 20-116-22-12-0064
15 20-116-22-12-0060
16 20-116-22-11-0064
17 20-116-22-14-0039
18 20-116-22-12-0021
19 20-116-22-12-0012
20 20-116-22-12-0080
21 20-116-22-12-0072 ."
22 20-116-22-12-0077
23 20-116-22-12-0031
24 20-116-22-12-0088
25 20-116-22-12-0018
26 20-116-22-12-0075
27 20-116-22-12-0093
28 20-116-22-12-0054
29 20-116-22-11-0017
30 20-116-22-12-0015
31 20-116-22-12-0005
32 20-116-22-12-0019
33 20-116-22-12-D009
34 20-116-22-11-0035
35 17-116-22-43-0011
36 20-116-22-12-0022
37 20-116-22-12-0068
38 20-116-22-12-0014
39 20-116-22-12-0045
40 20-116-22-11-0031
41 20-116-22-12-0079
42 20-116-22-12-0016
43 20-116-22-11-0028
44 20-116-22-12-0055
45 20-116-22-12-0052
46 20-116-22-12-0046
47 20-116-22-11-0036
48 20-116-22-12-0071
49 20-116-22-12-0047
50 20-116-22-12-0011
51 20-116-22-12-0013
52 20-116-22-12-0007
53 20-116-22-12-0023
54 20-116-22-12-0073
55 20-116-22-12-0099
-.-~~~
SALE SALE LOT
PRICE VALUE ,DIFF. DATE G.B.A. SIZE
$263.380 $217.600 $45.780 1990 2.697 13.800
$225.665 $202.800 $22.865 1991 2.970 13.500
-$225,430 $195.300 $30.130 1991 " 2;523 . 15.316
$218.100 $182.500 $35.600 1990 2,760 12.938
$203.025 $188.700 $14.325 1990 2.539 12.000
$202.449 $196.600 $5.849 1990 2,667 13.738
$199.585 $178.700 $20.885 1991 2.746 14.595
$199,475 $199.200 $275 1991 2.550 13.500 -
$197.560 $181.200 $16.360 1990 2.539 13.100
$193.780 $174.300 $19,480 1991 2.314 22.822
$193.440 $171.700 $21.740 1991 2,570 13,044
$193,240 $179,200 $14,040 1991 2,692 11,484
$193,150 $169,800 $23.350 1991 2.300 11.067
$190.260 $186.300 $3,960 1991 2,358 14.022
$189,715 $184,900 $4,815 1991 2.354 14.703
$187,390 $170,300 $17,090 1991 2.544 13,2oW
$187.215 $168.500 $18,715 1990 2.628 14.871
$186,350 $164.200 $22.150 1990 2,270 17.300
$179.895 $171.300 $8.595 1990 2.270 18.850
$177,250 $159.200 $18.050 1991 2.270 25,908
$176,275 $160,300 $15".975 1991 2,314 14.878
$175,682 $147.500 $28.182 1991 2,282 17,125
$174,910 $162.000 $12,910 1991 2.339 10,160
$172,000 $160.600 $11.400 1991 2,256 15.972
$170,027 $163.500 $6.527 1990 2,314 15.840
$169.880 $153,900 $15,980 1991 2,481 14,243
$168,620 $170,200 ($1.580) 1991 2.256 20.581
$167.895 $160,800 $7,095 1991 2,495 12,881
$167,740 $152,700 $15,040 1989 2.376 17,300
$167,525 $161,300 $6,225 1990 2.313 15.103
$166,945 $152,700 $14.245 1990 2.376 14,550
$166,765 $158,200 $8.565 1990 2.376 15,700
$166,263 $159,800 $6,463 1990 2,270 24.660
$165,645 $159.100 $6.545 1989 2.388 23.000
$164.820 $153.300 $11.520 1991 2,488 14.035
$163,015 $156.300 $6,715 1990 2.314 14,400
$162.600 $152.900 $9.700 1991 2.300 16.245
$161,625 $160.100 $1.525 1991 2.300 14,276
$161,030 $146,000 $15,030 1991 2.270 10,994
$160,655 $151,100 $9,555 1991 2.272 11,200
$160,425 $157,400 $3,025 1991 2,200 26.322
$160,347 S142,400 $17,947 1990 2,270 15.224
$159.800 $152,200 $7.600 1990 2.270 14,250
$159,662 $143,000 $16.662 1991 2.008 13.777
$159,430 $144,800 $14,630 1991 2.270 10.660
$159.127 $151.900 $7.227 1991 2,300 11.809
$158,595 S151,400 $7.195 1989 2.270 19.000
S156,350 $143.300 $13.050 1991 2.266 10,877
S155,740 $143.700 $12.040 1991 2.270 1O.1:M
$155,580 $166.700 ($11.120) 1990 2.300 28.571
$155.337 $141.800 $13,537 1990 2,072 11,400
$155.275 I $149,100 $6.175 1990 2,256 14.667
$155.240 S145,800 $9,440 1990 2.242 12.000
$155,080 $148,500 $6.580 1991 2.292 10,387
$154,290 SI44,500 $9.790 1991 2.284 9.748
Attachment C
56 20-116-22-12-0078 $153,435 $145,800 $7,635 1991 1,874 18,849
57 20-116-22-12-0069 $153,400 $134,100 $19,300 1991 1,874 14,581
58 20-116-22-12-0042 $152,700 $147,300 $5,400 1991 2,300 14,490
59 20-116-22-12-0002 $152,456 $146,300 $6,156 1990 2,314 12,869
60 20-116-22-12-0057 $151,630 $146,400 $5,230 1991 2,218 9,982
61 20-116-22-12-0066 $151.410 $136,100 $15,310 1991 1,874 14,470 • 62 20-H6-22-12-OO24 $151.140 $130,600 $20,540 1990 1,874 13,578
63 20-116-22-12-0010 $150,535 $150.700 ($165) 1991 1.842 28,693
64 20-116-22-12-0006 $150.277 $148.500 $1.777 1990 2.309 13,554
65 20-116-22-11-0032 $1'49.900 $150.000 ($100) 1991 2.309 12.700
66 20-116-22-11-0029 $149.288 $142.000 $7.288 1990 1.874 14.440
67 20-116-22-12-0076 $149,115 $148.700 $415 1991 1.842 14.159
68 20-116-22-12-0008 $149.070 $152,500 ($3,430) 1990 2.072 22.000
69 20-116-22-12-0053 $148.122 $129.300 $18.822 1991 1.874 9.912
70 20-116-22-11-0020 $148.000 $133.500 $14.500 1990 2.072 11.000
71 20-116-22-12-0043 $147.932 $136,200 $11.732 1991 2.008 10,639
72 20-116-22-12-0051 $147,430 $140.400 $7.030 1991 2.276 11.853
73 20-116-22-12-0017 $146.620 $139.700 $6.920 1990 1.874 11.235
74 20-116-22-12-0026 $144.697 $147.100 (S2.403) 1990 2.300 10.500
75 20-116-22-12-0029 $144,322 $144.100 S222 1990 2.270 11.703
76 20-116-22-12-0003 $144,215 $133.800 SIO,415 1990 2.072 15.000
77 20-116-22-11-0030 SI44,075 $142.400 SI.675 1989 2.300 12.000
78 20-116-22-12-0056 $143.960 $131.700 $12.260 1991 1.874 9,982
79 20-116-22-11-0021 $143,766 $133,100 $10.666 1990 2,270 12,000
80 20-116-22-11-0037 $143.305 $145,400 ($2.095) 1989 2.072 19.000
81 20-116-22-12-0044 $143,095 $139.100 $3,995 1991 2.202 10.098
82 20-116-22-12-0004 S142,175 $142.100 S75 1990 2.314 14,800
83 17-116-22-43-0010 $142.150 SI27.500 $14.650 1991 1.874 11.073
84 20-116-22-12-0070 $141.790 $128.100 $13.690 1991 1.874 11,525
85 20-116-22-12-0025 $139.030 $134.800 $4.230 1990 2.008 12,806
86 20-116-22-11-0019 $135,905 $134.300 $1.605 1989 2.072 15.000
87 20-116-22-11-0024 S135,180 $132.700 S2,480 1989 2.300 12.000 • 88 20-116-22-12-0067 $134.900 $123,000 $11.900 1991 1.389 18,220
89 17-116-22-43-0012 $134.740 $127.700 $7.040 1991 1.810 10.266
90 20-116-22-12-0028 $133.895 $125,500 $8.395 1990 1.874 10.200
91 20-116-22-12-0020 $132.185 $126,200 $5,985 1990 1,389 13.025
92 20-116-22-11-0023 $132.000 $126.700 $5.300 1990 2,072 12.000
93 20-116-22-11-0018 $127.400 $128.800 ($1.400) 1989 1.447 15.000
94 20-116-22-12-0027 $124.341 $123.000 $1,341 1990 1,365 9.614
95 20-116-22-11-0022 $118.655 $103.200 $15,455 1989 1.365 12.000
AVERAGE (ALL LOTS) $162,577 $152.311 $10.266 2.212 14,406
MINIMUM $118.655 $103.200 ($11.120) 1.365 9.614
MAXIMUM $263.380 $217.600 $45.780 2.970 28.693
AVERAGE (LESS LOW & HIGH) $161.965 $152,137 $9.829 2.216 14,439
MINIMUM $124.341 $123.000 ($11.120) 1.365 9.614
MAXIMUM $225.665 S202.800 S35.600 2,970 28,693
•
'1'77Q -.... -.-,
R1-9.S SALES
• ------AOOmON--------------- ---P.I.D.
-----
l ---:~_ 9LENSHIRE 09-116-22-13-0023 .... --------~,.. -~ 09-11 6-22-13--0025 ---------------_ ... -.. -
---_. --.-" .. -.-----... ". --.-.-. ------_. 09-116-22-12-0061 ---------------------------------09-116-22-13-0027 -
09-116-22-13-0028
-09-116-22-13-0016
-.----.--------09-116-22-13-0017
09-116-22-13-0018 --. -----.. ----
09-116-22-13-0019
..... __ . --09-116-22-13-()()Q9
AVERAGE
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
l --... -... -"
ROUND LAKE VIEW 08-116-22-22-0019
08-116-22-22-0021 --." •.. _ .. -
--.-.--_._--.. "-_ ... --..... --._.--08-116-22-22-0015
.---"_ .. _.--'-... -•.. _ .. ..-.. 08-116-22-22-0017
--08-116-22-22-0028 • --08-116-22-22-0027
08-116-22-22-0022
--08-116-22-22-0026 --
08-116-22-22-0016
08-116-22-22-0025 ---... -.•... -
--.. -. 08-116-22-22-0014
AVERAGE
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
•
SALE
PRICE
183,803
174,878
165,000
163,916
160,000
159,900
155,759
153.160
144,437
132,250
$159,310
$132,250
$183.803
180,350
154.162
148,920
_148.705
143,386
137,806
136.700
136.380
132,270
128,413
108,556
$141,423
$108.556
$180,350
SALE
DATE
1989
1989
1990
1989
1990
1989
1989
1989
1991
1991
1991
1990
1991
__ 1991
1990
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
1991
AREA
11,000
13,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
9,000
10,000
13,000
10,000
11,000
10.700
9,000
13,000
18,650
12,400
10,500
9,472
13,000
10,500
10.500
11,200
9,300
9,900
13,000
11,675
9,300
18,650
G.B.A.
"\ 'f
2.406
2,159
2,263
1,950
2,186
2,272
2,154
2,182
2,036
1,345
2,095
1,345
2,406
2,052
1,164
1,427
1,429
1,251
2,066
1.408
1,411
1,690
1,624
1,106
1,512
1,106
2,066
Attachment D
I WOODLAND PONDS 25-116-22-42-0124 254,480 1991 12,000 2,299
25-116-22-42-0123 212,050 1991 12,400 2,185
25-116-22-42-0128 205,000 1990 13,000 1,70)-'. ,
25-116-22-43-0203 200,558 1989 21.900 2,31m-
25-116-22-43-0196 185,600 1990 9,525 2,557
.. -. -.... -.. --25-116-22-43-0194 184,400 1991 9.600 t:~2 . -. -• 25-116-22-42-0131 183.590 1990 0 1.,6j)7 ._-
,.,-.; -'.' :""'r' •. 25-116-22-43-0197 181.500 1990 10.400 2.297 '.:.-.. -... _.u. __ ... _ .. _ ~._ -. .. -. -.~
25-116-22-43-0218 180.000 1991 16.900 2.277
25-116-22-43-0191 174,436 1990 9.200 1.608
25-116-22-42-0132 169,550 1990 9.600 2,312
25-116-22-43-0195 169.200 1991 9.525 1.966
25-116-22-43-0192 166.466 1990 10,200 2.170
25-116-22-43-0219 149,000 1991 35.200 1.604
AVERAGE $186,845 12.818 2.063
MINIMUM $149.000 0 1.604
MAXIMUM $254,480 35,200 2,557
I WYNDHAM NOB 2ND 06-116-22-21-0058 185.000 1991 21.000 2.322
06-116-22-21-0040 162,500 1992 15,500 2,108
06-116-22-21-0055 153,801 1991 14,000 2.171
. -... --.. __ .......
06-116-22-21-0037 121,400 1990 13,000 1.196
. -~ . --. ".-' ... "--.
AVERAGE $155,675 15,875 1.949
MINIMUM. $121.400 13,000 1.196
MAXIMUM $185,000 21.000 2,322
I ZACHMAN BROTHERS 23-116-22-12-0078 142.800 1989 13,000 1.389 • 23-116-22-12-0079 141.540 1989 13,500 1.200
23-116-22-12-0077 132,900 1989 13.524 1.150
23-116-22-12-0075 130.354 1989 9.408 1.207
23-116-22-12-0086 122.500 1990 9,660 1.097
23-116-22-12-0080 122.010 1992 16.800 1,535
23-116-22-12-0085 121.235 1989 9,625 1,145
23-116-22-12-0084 118.850 1989 9.660 1.236
23-116-22-12-0086 117.200 1989 9,660 1.097
23-116-22-12-0083 115.820 1990 9,400 936
23-116-22-12-0081 115.556 1991 17.300 1,283
23-116-22-12-0087 114,360 1989 9,660 1.152 . 23-116-22-12-0074 110.693 1989 8.500 1.087
23-116-22-12-0073 107.900 1989 11,400 l,o .. n
23-116-22-12-0088 104,000 1990 12,600 941
AVERAGE $121.181 11.580 1.167
MINIMUM $104,000 8,500 936
MAXIMUM $142.800 17,300 1.535
•
•
•
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
FAIRFIELD Rl-13.S
SALES COMPARISON
PID . .
20-116-22-14-0030
20-116-22-14-0041
20-116-22-14-0044
20-116-22-14-0042
2O-116-22-13-D040
20-116-22-14-0043
20-116-22-14-0027
20-116-22-14-0023
20-116-22-14-D040
20-116-22-14-0031
20-116-22-12-0048
20-116-22-14-0026
20-116-22-14-0028
20-116-22-14-0025
20-116-22-14-0038
20-116-22-11-0046
20-116-22-11-0056
20-116-22-14-0014
20-116-22-11-0045
20-116-22-13-0041
20-116-22-14-0035
20-116-22-14-0020
20-116-22-14-0029
20-116-22-11-0043
.20-116-22-14-0015
20-116-22-13-0039
20-116-22-11-0055
20-116-22-11-0048
20-116-22-11-0050
20-116-22-14-0013
20-116-22-11-0049
20-116-22-14-D009
20-116-22-14-0008
20-116-22-14-0024
20-116-22-14-0021
20-116-22-11-0044
20-116-22-14-0011
20-116-22-14-0017
20-116-22-14-0012
40 20-116-22-14-0010
41 20-116-22-12-0063
AVERAGE
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
" ...
. . 1:'
SALE
PRICE VALUE
$273,375 $220.300
$272,885 $228.100
$260.025--$218;200
$243,~50 ·$219.800
$237,265 $210.600
$227,955 $208.700
$224,105 $216.300
$220,905 $199,600
$216,180 $180.500
$212,600 $196,900
$212,295 $175,900
$212,225 $204,600
$210,040 $199,500
$207,760 $193,700
$205,405 $178.200
$205,105 $170,800
$202,895 $181.500
$202,000 $186,700
$201,740 $187.800
$201.550 $183.800
$201.550 $164,100
$20U86. $189,900
$201,180 $196,800
$196,770 $186,300
$196,625 $184.200
$195,865 $185,900
$190,475 $183,700
$188,565 $172,900
$186,755 $181.100
$186,450 $182,100
$183,175 $176,100
$181',000 $169,600
$180,520 $162.500
$180,390 $174,700
$178.845 $169,700
$177,050 $164.000
$175,655 $166.300
$171,370 $165.400
$170:188 $168.900
$169.380 $165.500
$169,000 $183.500
$203,226 $186.700
$169,000 $162,500
$273,375 $228.100
SALE LOT
DIFF DATE G B.A. SIZE
. $53:075 · .. 1990 3,107 . 19,500 "-
·-$44,785----1990 2,704 14,033 ,;;; ..
·-$4+.825--1991· ···2,684-44.446 --
$24,150 ... 1991 2,667-15;347
$26,655 1991 2,544 15,086
$19.255 --1990 -2,544 . 16.9-31--
$7,805 1989 2,962 20,000
$21,305 1989 2,690 15,000
$35,680 -1990 2,544 16,493
$15,700 1990 2,539 18,300
$36,395 1991 2,544 13,500
$7,625 1990 2,910 18,600
$10,540 1990 2,539 23,000
$14,060. -·-1989 .2,688 -19,000
$27.205 1991 2,800 14,839
$34,305 1991 2,671 29,700
$21,395 1989 2,539 -15,200
$15,300. ._1990. ... 2,539. 14,600
$13,940 1990 2,712 16.200
$17,780 1991 2,292 15,128
$37,450 1991 2,682 15,900
.. $11.286 _ 1989 2.712 14,000
$4,380 1990 2,822 16,100
$10,470 1990 2,539 14,500
$12,425 1990 2,822 15,600
$9,965 1991 2,542 17,189
$6,775 1989 2,846 13,000
$15,665 1990 2,661 17,000
$5,655 1990 2,624 14,000
$4,350 1989 2,569 14,000
$7,075 1990 2,380 16,200
$11.400 1990 2,309 13,000
$18,020 1989 2,339 13,000
$5,690 1989 2,362 15,000
$9,145 1990 2,267 15,800
$13,050 1989 2,468 15,000
$9,355 1990 2,300 14,800
$5,970 1990 2,374 16,810
$1.288 1990 2,654 14,600
$3.880 1990 2,376 13,600
($14,500) 1991 2,542 13,946
$16,526 2,595 16,048
($14,500) 2,267 13,000
$53,075 3,107 29,700
Attachment E
Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes
September 14, 1992
B. FAIRFIELD SOUTH by Centex Real Estate Corp. Request for Zoning District Change from
Rural to RI-13.5 on 19.24 acres and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 30.95 acres and Preliminary PIa.
of 50.19 acres into 94 lots, 6 outlots and rOad right-of-way. Location: North of County Roa
1, west of Braxton Drive. ~-}
Uram reported that the developer had requested a two week continuance to gather more
information on housing.
Kardell asked if the project would still be presented in a two meeting format. Uram replied that
this still could be possible. Uram added that Staff had been gathering information on the
provision of affordable housing. Staff had analyzed 25 projects with only 11 projects with home
values close to the FHA maximum mortgage limit. It appears that cost figures are based more
on the square footage of the home than on the land. Uram stated that there were many unknown
factors in the price of the home. Uram did not believe that starter housing could be provided
within the RI-9.5 zoning district as it is currently being implemented.
Sandstad believed that there would have to be smaller lots and smaller buildings on the lots.
Uram stated that this would require lower setback requirements and the building square footage
would have to be restricted.
Clish questioned if developers would be willing to try smaller lots and smaller homes. Uram
replied that a developer would have to be willing to try something new. Uram believed that
affordable housing was something important for the City to strive for.
Wissner asked if zero lot lines could work here. Uram replied that there were many posSibl.
alternatives.
U ram noted that the topic of affordable housing was not about Centex and its projects but an
issue which happened to come up at the time that this project was proposed.
Kardell stated that she would like to know what the average lot size would be in the RI-9.5
district. Uram replied that this information would be available; however, lot sizes would be
dictated by location. Kardell also requested that if at all possible the two meeting format be
presented.
MOTION:
Kardell moved, seconded by Wissner to continue the public hearing until the September 18, 1992
Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0-0.
•
72'-)5
•
•
•
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
UNAPPROVED :MINUTES
l\-IONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 7:30 PM CITY HALL COUNCil.. CHAMBERS
7hOO FYPrllhvP. nrivp
A. FAIRFIELD SOUTH by Centex Real Estate Corp. Request for Zoning District Change from
Rural to RI-I3.5 on 16.2 acres and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 26.6 acres and Preliminary Plat of
49.9 acres into 94 lots, 4 outlots and road right-of-way. Location: North of County Road 1,
west of Braxton Drive.
Dan Blake, representing the proponent, presented a diagram of the proposed Fairfield South
addition. He stated that it is a continuation of the existing Fairfield project. He stated that this
project originated in 1988 with two neighborhoods; the RI-9.5 lots which were north and west
of the pond and the executive RI-I3.5 lots which were south and east of the pond. The proposal
is to develop 65 lots into RI-9.5 and 29 lots into the RI-13.5 zoning district. The homes will
be built to City standards with landscaping and benning similar to the other Centex adaitiOn.
adjacent to this site. No two homes across, beside or diagonal from each other will_~e built 0
painted the same.' ,)
Sandstad asked where the sidewalks and trails will be located. Blake replied along Braxton Drive
according to the plan that the Park Staff has developed.
Franzen stated that the RI-9.5 district has a place in Eden Prairie even if it does not provide
starter housing because it provides for lower cost housing and helps maintain housing diversity.
If the Commission concurs with this, then this is a reasonable subdivision and it is not out of
character.
Sandstad asked if the wetland is relocating. Blake stated no, they are changing the elevation of
the wetland.
Sandstad asked how close is this development to the proposed Marsh Creek Golf Course. Blake
replied there is an 85 acre site between the two which is approximately 1/3 mile.
No citizens were present for the public hearing.
Norman asked if Centex has overbuilt RI-9.5 lots. Dan Blake stated that this is an extension of
the Fairfield addition and that it is the same size with the same lot sizes proposed.
Wissner asked approximately how many total lots has Centex developed. Blake responded be
stating 500.
Bauer stated that the RI-9.5 issue is a complex one, but feels it meets economic needs at this
time and contributes to housing diversity.
MOTION 1:
Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0.
MOTION 2:
Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of Centex Real Estate Corp. for a Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 16.6 acres
and from Rural to RI-9.5 on 26.6 acres based on plans dated September 11, 1992, revised plans
dated September 25, 1992 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated
September 25, 1992. Motion carried 6-0.
•
•
•
•
MQTION3;
Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City Council approval of the request
of Centex Real Estate Corp. for Preliminary Plat of 49.9 into 94 lots, 4 outlots and road right-of-
way, based on plans dated September 11, 1992, revised plans dated September 25, 1992 and
subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 25, 1992. Motion carried
6-0.
OCTOBER 20.1992
28795 VOID OUT CHECK O.OC
28796 DON POUPARD REFUND--BUILDING PERMIT DEPOSIT 30.0C
.8797 T J V CONSTRUCTION -REFUND--ESCROW CHECK FOR GUARANTEE OF TREE 2500.0C
-PLANT1NG & ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
~~rnING ri
28798 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH -WATER SUPPLY OPERATOR CERTIFitATION EXAM 15.0C
FEE
28799 STATE TREASURER . WASTE WATER CERTIFICATION FEE-WATER DEPT 15.0C
28800 SIGNATURE BEEF & GRILL EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 95.0£
28801 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 150.0C
28802 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 75.0C
28803 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 1L1E
28804 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL -CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT/HUMAN RESOURCES 190.0C
DEPT
28805 JOHN FRANE SEPTEMBER 92 EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 200.0C
28806 EGGHEAD SOF'IWARE COMPUTER SOF'IWARE-FINANCE DEPT 346.9~
28807 PETTY CASH -EXPENSES-CITY HALLIENGINEERING DEPTIPARK 48.6~
MAINT/SENIOR CENTER
28808 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC OCTOBER 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 4948.6J
28809 DARLENE BARDZINSKI REFUND--SWIMMING LESSONS 19.0C
28810 KAY BLAESER REFUND--SKATING LESSONS 40.0C
28811 ANGELA DALTON REFUND--KIDS KORNER PROGRAM 4.0(
28812 DEBBY DEMEE REFUND--SWIMMING LESSONS 19.0(
28813 MAUREEN HENDERSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.0(
28814 MILLIE KOSIEK -REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS/KIDS KORNER 40.0(
PROGRAM
28815 TERESA RASMUSSEN REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS CLASS 2LO<
28816 JANET RICHARDS REFUND--SWIMMING LESSONS 34.0<
.8817 SHERRIE SMETANA REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS CLASS 2LO(
8818 SHERYL TRAINOR REFUND--SWIMMING LESSONS 28.0(
28819 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY COPY PAPER-CITY HALL 585.21
28820 AMERICAN RED CROSS CONFERENCE-POOL LESSONS 40.0(
28821 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENGRS CONFERENCE-PARK MAl NT/SEWER DEPT 45.0i
28822 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MEETING EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 50.0'
28823 MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN MEETING EXPENSES-PARK MAINTENANCE 15.0
28824 DULUTH TECHNICAL COLLEGE CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 110.0·
28825 HOLIDAY INN-NEW ULM CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPT 66.8
28826 MAXINE BRUECK COMPUTER SOFTWARE-FINANCE DEPT 200.0
28827 HONEYWELL INC -CHARTS/AUGUST 92 INSTRUMENTATION MAINT 2460.7
AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT
28828 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING -PRINTING FORMS/FLYERS-POLICE DEPT/FIRE 1956.0
-DEPT/SENIOR CENTER/COMMUNITY CENTER/
HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM
28829 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP MIX 136.5
28830 CHIPPEWA SPRINGS LTD MIX 12.1
28831 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 16019.6
28832 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 32694.6
28833 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 90.0
28834 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 24890.2
28835 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 735.7
28836 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 472.£
28837 POGREBA DISTRIBUTING INC BEER 569.2
28838 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 34363.E
28839 KELLI AMBROSO REFUND--RACQUETBALL LESSONS 28.(
.8840 CHARLES CORNELL REFUND-BASIC WATER SAFETY CLASS 44.(
12445612
OCTOBER 20.1992
28841
·28842
28843
28844
28845
28846
28841
28848
KATHY FISHER
JUNE & GORDON GILBERT
MARTHA OBYRNE
KONNIE SMITH
LISA VANCE
FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE
VOID OUT CHECK
DELEGARD TOOL CO
REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS
REFUN~SWIMMING LESSONS
REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING CLASS
REFUND-BASIC WATER SAFETY CLASS
PAYROLL 10-2-92
-SCREWDRIVERSIHALOGEN LAMPSIHEAT GUNlHooKSI
-BLADESIRECHARGEABLE LIGHTS/SPRAY GUN/
28849 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
REPLACED ARMATURE & BRUSHES-EQUIPMENT MAINT
-TOOL BOX/CONNECTORS/FILTERS/FITTINGS/
28850
28851
28852
28853
28854
28855
28856
28857
28858
28859
28860
28861
28862
28863
28864
28865
28866
28861
28868
28869
28810
28811
28812
28813
28814
-DISC SETSIBEARINGSIWATER PUMPSIHOSE ENDS/
-THERMOSTAT/GASKETSIBRAKE CABLEIWIRE SET/
-COOLANTIROTOR/DISTRIBUTOR CAPIBULBS/SEALS/
-MIRROR/PULLERIHORNITAPE/IGNITION COIL/
-CHAINIMUFFLER-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/
UTILITIES DIVISION
MACA CONFERENCE-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT
MDPS-MAWP CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT
HOLIDAY INN CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPT
DROVERS INN MEETING EXPENSES-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT
SUBURBAN UTILITIES SUPT ASSN CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FUEL TAX LICENSE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 10-2-92 SAVINGS BONDS
GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 10-2-92
GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY OCTOBER 92 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 10-2-92 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 10-2-92 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-451 PAYROLL 10-2-92
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 10-2-92
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 10-2-92
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 10-2-92
MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE OCTOBER 92 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM
MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-2-92
MINNESOTA UC FUND -2ND QTR 92 ADDITIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT
NORWEST BANK HOPKINS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA
UNITED WAY
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
COMPENSATION
PAYROLLS 9-18-92 & 10-2-92
PAYROLL 10-2-92
PAYROLL 10-2-92
UTILITY BILLING FOR 8950 EDEN PRAIRIE RD
SERVICE
SERVICE
-2ND HALF PROPERTY TAX-1835 EDEN COURT/
-8101 EDEN PRAIRIE RD/14350 PIONEER TRAIL/
28815 ZUHRAH SHRINE CIRCUS
EATON INDUSTRIAL ADDNIBERMEL-SMABY
-TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/
FEES PAID
28816 FEIST BLANCHARD CO
28811 MINNESOTA PRIMA
28818 HOLIDAY EXPO
28819 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE
20693355
-ROTORS/BEARINGS/OIL SEALSIBELTS/FUEL
INJECTION HOSES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT
CONFERENCE-LIQUOR STORE
-DUST MASKSIMIXER/CORD ENDS/DOOR CATCH/
-EXTENSION CORDSIBRACKETS/HEDGE SHEARIHAND
-PUMP/PVC PIPE/ELBOWS/ADAPTERS/UTILITY
-KNIFEIHOSE NOZZLE/FOAM BRUSHES/GARDEN
-HOSE/DRILL BIT SET/SCREWS/SILlCONE-STREET
16.2E
,
.OC
.OC
O.OC
22.0C
61850.1E
O.OC
528.2E
3669.8~
50.0C
90.0C
603.4C
23.8!
20.0C
25.0(
250.0(
6144.0(
2131.8:
280.0( a 6( .1;
32.0(
591.3<
50.0<
2865.4'
25.0(
8.8'
1200.0'
35301.2
164.5
18.6'
3092.4
31848.3
45150.4
132.0
212.3
20.0
29.0
113.0 •
MAINT/PARK MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER
28880 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -MAILBOX/PAINT/INSECT SPRAY/SILICA SAND/ 1285.18
-STRAPS/COUPLINGS/CONNECTORS/PIPEINUTS &
-BOLTS/TURNBUCKLES/CLIPS/CAULKINGIBLADES/ .,; • -SHELVING/GASKETS/ BATTERIES/MASKING TAPE/ l
-VALVESIBRACKETS/OIL/SCRAPERIBRUSHESIBELTS/
-CABLE TIES/CLAMPS/KEYS/PAILSIHOSE CLAMPS/
-HOSES/FORKS/ICE PACKSIWASH TUB/FERTILIZ~/
-SANDPAPERIRUST REMOVER/LAUNDRY DETERGENri
-CHISEL/PUNCHIWASHERS-STREET DEPT/PARK
-MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER/
UTILITIES DIVISION
28881 G L CONTRACTING INC -SERVICE-CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL WATERMAIN 24950.7';.
LOOP
28882 BROWN & CRIS INC SERVICE-EDEN HILLSIBRAXTON DR IMPROVEMENTS 6376.0'i
28883 S M HENTGES & SONS INC SERVICE-ROWLAND RD & OLD SHADY OAK RD 163971.6E
28884 IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS SERVICE-DELL ROAD/MILLER PARK 238372.9E
28885 RICHARD KNUTSON INC -SERVICE-BLUFFS E 8THIBLUFFS W 9THIHAWK 7125.7E
HIGH RIDGE/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES
28886 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-DELL RD-HWY & BRIDGECONST 315274.2L
28887 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO -SERVICE-CREEK KNOLLSIBLUFFS E 12TH 114387. Sf:
ADDNIVALLEY VIEW SIDEWALK
28888 RYAN CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-LEONA RD IMPROVEMENTS 22823.8~
28889 SHINGOBEE BUILDERS INC -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER 2ND ICE SHEET/ 312632.6~
CO~JNITY CENTER FRONT ENTRY
28890 VALLEY PAVING INC -SERVICE-RECONSTRUCT PRAIRIE CENTER DR/ 70106.6t
REGIONAL CTR ROAD
28891 WIDMER INC SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK WETLAND RESTORATION 22538.7:
28892 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER TRENCHER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 103.2:
28893 ARDEN AANESTAD GROUSE CLINIC INSTRUCTOR/FEES PD 35.0<
.8894 ABBOTT PAINT & CARPET CO PAINT BRUSHES-WATER DEPT 83.4:
8895 ACTION RENTAL CENTERS ~SNOWCONE MACHINE RENTAL-FIREMANS PICNIC-71. 7;
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
28896 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-329.5:
WATER PLANT BLDG
28897 AIM ELECTRONICS INC -RELOCATION OF HOCKEY SCOREBOARD-COMMUNITY 465.0
CENTER
28898 AIRSIGNAL INC -PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT/ 408.1
COMMUNITY CENTER
28899 ALDUS CORPORATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 93.7
28900 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO -UNIFORMS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS/FACILITIES/ 1600.3
-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/
-COMMUNITY CTRIUTILITIES DIV/TOWELS & MATS-
LIQUOR STORES
28901 ASLA DUES-PARK PLANNING DEPT 253.0
28902 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC PUBLICATIONS-WATER DEPT 139.9
28903 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC TRAFFIC CONES/SIGNS/POSTS-STREET DEPT 420.5
28904 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING WASTE DISPOSAL-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 53.2
28905 APOLLO ELEVATOR CO ELEVATOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 433.5
28906 APPLE COMPUTER INC PAPER TRAY-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 66.3
28907 ARMOR SECURITY INC REKEYED LOCK-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 64.C
28908 ARTISANS T-SHIRTS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 68.C
28909 ASPEN CARPET CLEANING CARPET CLEANING-ELECTIONS DEPT 79.c
28910 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS INC PRESSURE SWITCHIWELL REPAIR-RILEY LAKE PARK 119.~
130473484 •
r>, ,)11 R-. V·
-,r--/ J
OcroBER 20.1992
28911 ASTLE FORD INTL INC SEAT-FORESTRY DEPT 330.1·
28912 PAM ATKINS REFUND-VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE REGISTRATION FEE 150.0'
28913 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO -WHEEL ALIGNMENTIRAISED SUSPENSION 1_°' CROSSMEMBER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
28914 B & STOOLS -BATTERY CHARGER/SOCKETSIWRENGHESIBATTERY/ .6;
-FLASHLIGHT BULBS/DRILL BIT-STREET DEPT/
WATER DEPT
28915 MICHAEL BARONE MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES 18.0!
28916 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -POWER STEERING FLUID/FLASHERS/SPARK 746.4:
-PLUGSIBRAKE FLUID/SEALED BEAMSIBATTERIES/
-MUFFLER CLAMPSIWINDSHIELD SOLVENT/SIGNAL
LIGHTSIt1IRROR HEADS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
28917 DENISE BECK -SWIMMING INSTRUCTOR-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 41.2.
PROGRAM/FEES PAID
28918 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-LEONA ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2203.0 1
28919 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY EXPENSES-ELECTIONS DEPT 64.0 1
28920 A BETTER PHONE CENTER INC TELEPHONE-OUTDOOR CENTER 117.1:
28921 DAVE BLACK MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 10. T
28922 I SAAC RANSOM BLAKY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 341.2:
28923 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 394.9·
28924 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG BALDOR MOTOR-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 630.7
28925 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO EXPENSES-POOL LESSONS 75.5
28926 LEE BRANDT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 276.2
28927 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING INC SERVICE-BLUFFS E 12TH ADDITION 2599.7
28928 BROADWAY AWARDS TROPHY-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 22.1
28929 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET-LEONA ROAD 7385.7
28930 BRW INC SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD/DELL ROAD 27662.6
28931 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ROCK-PARK MAINTENANCE 68.1
28932 WES BYRON SOFTBALL OFFICAL/FEES PD ' •. 5
28933 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAIBATTERIES/COIL CORD-POLICE DEPT .4
28934 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 2712.1
28935 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC SEPTEMBER 92 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE 80.0
28936 CARLSONS TREE SERVICE TREE REMOVAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1224.7
28937 CARTRIDGECARE INC PRINTER CARTRIDGES-CITY HALL 83.0
28938 CENTRAIRE INC -A/C UNIT TRANSFORMER & RELAY REPLACED-203.0
-OUTDOOR CENTER/FLAME SENSOR REPLACED-
SENIOR CENTER
28939 CENTRAL-ALLIED ENTERPRISES INC GUARDRAIL-DRAINAGE CONTROL 22.2
28940 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC OIL-WATER DEPT 650.2
28941 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS -SERVICE-REMODELING OF CPT BUILDING FOR 11064. ::
-CIVIC CENTER/GRAPHICS FOR JOHN TEMAN
PROPERTY
28942 COPIES NOW FORMS-ENGINEERING DEPT 106.1
28943 COPY EQUIPMENT INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES/COPIER REPAIR-ENGINEERING 650.1
DEPT
28944 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 170.£
28945 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC STAINLESS STEEL CLEANER-WATER DEPT 37.£
28946 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 15390.(
28947 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 73.1
28950 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO VALVE BOX RISER-WATER DEPT 381.~
28951 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE -AGRICULTURAL LIMING MATERIAL SAMPLE FEE-80.C
WATER DEPT
28952 DAN DESAULNIERS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 65.C
28953 BRIAN J DEVRIES FIRE CALLS .:~ 28954 EUGENE DIETZ SEPTEMBER 92 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT
7779558
'7 '7 L1f~J C
-...--. I
OCIDBER 20.1992
28955 DORADUS CORPORATION SIREN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CIVIL DEFENSE 732.0C
.8956 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL SERVICE-LEASE REVENUE BONDS 12944.9E
8957 DPC INDUSTRIES INC SODIUM .. PHOSPHATE-WATER DEPT 3720.84
28958 DUNHAM-BUSH INC FREIGHT CHARGES-WATER DEPT ",.",,-2.7E
28959 DYNA SYSTEMS -DRILL BITS/WASHERSINUTS & BQL1S/SCREWS-900.6E
WATER DEPI'
28960 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES 32.0C
28961 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD -PLUGITUBES/CLAMPS/PUMP/FANIVALVE-329.4t
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
28962 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPI' 15.0C
28963 E P PHOTO PRINTS-FIRE DEPT 7.n
28964 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 -EMPLOYEE PICNIC EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES/ 150.5';
-COPIES-SENIOR CENTER & HISTORICAL
INTERPRETATION PROG~~
28965 EDEN PRAIRIE TIRE & AUTO SVC WHEEL ALIGNMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38.9!:
28966 CITY OF EDINA SEPTEMBER 92 EXPENSES-WATER DEPT 330.0C
28967 EDINA SENIOR CENTER -CITY~S SHARE OF JOAN KENNEDY TALK-SENIOR 16.5C
CENTER/FEES PAID
28968 CHRI STY ELDER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 25.0C
28969 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES MOTOR REPAIR-WATER DEPT 162.8~
28970 STEVE ELFSTROM REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.0(
28971 ENVIRO-TECH SILT FENCE INSTALLED-RILEY LAKE PARK 508.4(
28972 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 96. 6~
28973 DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION/ 4545.0(
COMMUNITY CTR PLAZA & PARKING PROJECT
28974 DOUGLAS ERNST TELEPHONE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT-PARKS DEPT 10.9:
28975 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT RINGS/FRAME-SEWER DEPT 740.1[
.8976 LIZ FABISH REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 25.0(
8977 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPI' 890.0:
28978 FIDELITY PRODUCTS GARBAGE BAGS-WATER DEPT . 111. T
28979 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES BASKETBALL HOOP IMPROVEMENTS-ROUND LAKE PARK 996.1
28980 FLOYD SECURITY -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-72.4
CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD
28981 FOCUS ONE HOUR PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-ASSESSING DEPT 80.8
28982 FORKLIFT & EQUIPMENT SERVICES CABLEINUTIRETAINER/SPRING-WATER DEPT 27.4
28983 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MN ELEMENTS-WATER DEPT 116.1
28984 FREUND CAN CO PAINT CONTAINERS-WATER DEPT 124.4
28985 LYNDELL FREY VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 160.0
28986 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE FOAM/FOAM INDUCTORS & NOZZLES-FIRE DEPT 4153.5
28987 G & K SERVICES TOWELS & COVERALLS-PARKS DEPT & WATER DEPT 848.5
28988 GINA MARIAS INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 26.7
28989 GIRARDS BUSINESS MACHINES INC -CHECK SIGNER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-198.0
FINANCE DEPI'
28990 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC -SEPTEMBER 92 EXPENSES-SOLID WASTE 2169.0
MANAGEMENT
28991 W W GRAINGER INC -PROTECTIVE APRONS/SAFETY GLASSES-233.0
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
28992 THE DALE GREEN CO BLACK DIRT-DUST CONTROL-STREET DEPT 51.1
28993 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC HAND DRYER REPAIR-PARKS DEPT 89.S 28994 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 302.~
28995 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW RD & TOPVIEW RD 62727.L
-SIDEWALKIRIVERVIEW RD WATERMAIN/SANITARY
• -SEWER TO MILLER PARK/TOPVIEW LIFT STATION/
-MILLER PARKIBLUFFS E 8TH ADDN/BLUFFS W
-9TH ADDN/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDN/
-RIVERVIEW RDIBRAXTON DR/CREEK KNOLLS/HAWK
9878922
'72. Lr7 r)
28996
28991
28998
28999
29000
29001
29002
29003
29004
29005
29006
29007
HARMON GLASS COMPANY
HARVEST NOON
RICK HATCHER
LAURIE HELLING
HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
D C HEY COMPANY INC
STEVE HIGLEY
HOFFERS INC
HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC
TODD HOLZEMER
29008 HONEYWELL INC
29009 1-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION
29010 ICMA
29011 INLAND TRUCK PARTS CO
29012 INSTY-PRINTS
29013 INTERIM PERSONNEL SERVICES
29014 INTERSTATE BEARING
29015 BRUCE ISAACS
29016 GARY ISAACS
29011 JERRYS NEWMARKET
l~fgHA~b~~p~t~'~T~~N~~~GBk13LUFFS E 11TH &
WINDSHIELDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PRECINCT LUNCHES & DINNERS-ELECTIONS DEPT
REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE
MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
-AUGUST 92 FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT/
PARK MAINTENANCE~}
AUGUST 92 BOOKING FEE-POLICE~DEPT
SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT
COPIER REPAIR-WATER DEPT
SOFTBALL & VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
REPLACED TICKET WINDOW-COMMUNITY CENTER
REPLACED SHAFT SEAL-COMMUNITY CENTER
-SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER-ADAPTIVE
RECREATION PROGRAM
-INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER
DEPT
DUES-CITY COUNCIL
DUES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT
-SEALS/STRAP KITIBALL BEARIN.GS/ GUARDRAIL
PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTIDRAINAGE CONTROL DEPT
-BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT/DOG LICENSE
APPLICATIONS-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT
SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE
THREADED SEALS/GASKETS-WATER DEPT
SOFTBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-SOFTBALLIVOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS
COORDINATOR/FEES PAID
-EXPENSES-FIREMANS PICNIC-HUMAN RESOURCES
-DEPT/FIRE DEPT/HISTORICAL & CULTURAL
COMMISSION
29018
29019
29020
29021
29022
JOHNSON/ANDERSON INC ENVELOPES-CITY HALL
JOHNSON CONTROLS A/C FAN MOTOR REPLACED-COMMUNITY CENTER
PAM KLOOS EXPENSES-KIDS KORNER PROGRAM
KNOLLWOOD LIQUOR & BEVERAGE CATER EXPENSES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC -PROLASER LIDAR SYSTEMIBATTERY PACK-POLICE
29023 LAGERQUIST CORPORATION
29024 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR
29025 LAKE REGION VENDING
29026 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC
29021
29028
29029
29030
29031
29032
29033
LAMETTRYS COLLISION
LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER
CINDY LANENBERG
LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD
LARSON RESIDENCE
LEAANNS SEWING/CUSTOM DECORAT
L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
29034 F B LEOPOLD COMPANY INC
3692414
FORFEITURE-DRUGS
ELEVATOR REPAIR-WATER DEPT
-AIRLIFT REBUILD KIT/LUBRICANTIBEARINGS-
POLICE BLDG/FIRE STATION
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
-CONTROL ASSEMBLYIHEATER HOSEIVALVES/
-SWITCH/PLATE DOOR/FLOOR MAT-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
REPAIR & REFINISH VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT MAINT
SHRUBS-FORESTRY DEPT
MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT
APRIL 92 LEGAL SERVICE
REFUND-FALSE ALARM FEE
REPLACED FIRE COAT ZIPPER-FIRE DEPT
-SEPTEMBER 92 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD
LANDFILL
FREIGHT-WATER DEPT
532.5E
124.2C
100.OC
•
. OC
.OC
839.0<
65L6~
101.8~
282.2t
219.0C
l75.0(
90.0e
l200.0C
1965.5t
63.0C
87 .2~
232.1'
3350.3:
141.6'
120.5(
400.2:
416.2:
• .4
843.4
7.0
121.3
4888.3
163.5
239.1
139.1
235.1
104.8
834.9
54.5
15216.1
25.C
33.2
1121.C
4.'::
•
OCTOBER 20.1992
29035 BECKY LESKE
~9036 TRACY LUKE
29037 LUNDS
29038 LYONS SAFETY
29039 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
29040 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
29041 MARKS W~ 5 AMOCO
29042 MASYS CORPORATION
29043 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC
29044 KIT MCCALLA
29045 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
29046 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
29047 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC
29048 MCGRAW-HILL PUBLISHING 00
29049 A MEAT SHOPPE
29050 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO
29051 METALS JOINING LAB CO INC
29052 METRO FIRE
29053 METRO PAINTING & DECORATING
29054 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC
.9055 METRO SALES INC
29056 KAREN MICHAEL
29057 MICRORIM
29058 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
29059 MIV~EST BUSINESS PRODUCTS
29060 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO
29061 MPLS AREA ASSN OF REALTORS
29062 MINNCOMM PAGING
29063 MINNEAPOLIS SPRING & BODY INC
29064 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC
29065 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
29066 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS
29067 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSN
29068 MN CULTURAL DIVERSITY CENTER
29069 MN STREET & SUPERINTENDENT ASSN
29070 LUCY MORRISSEY
29071 MOTOROLA INC
29072 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
29073 MUNICILITE CO
29074 JAN NELSON
29075 BETH NILSSON
29076 NORTH COUNTRY PEST CONTROL
.9077 NORTH STAR ICE
9078 NOTT COMPANY
2056322
-SERVICE-YOUTH RECREATION INSTRUCTOR/
MILEAGE-DAY CAMP PROGRAM
MILEAGE-POLICE DEPT
-EXPENSES-FIREMANS PICNIC-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT ., .--,)
GLOVES-UTILITIES DIVISION
CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
SHEAR PIN STOP CLIP-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
-NOVEMBER 92 COMPUTER MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT
TOWING SERVICE-STREET MAINTENANCE
FIRE CALLS
-EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR CTR!
RECREATION ADMINISTRATION DEPT
EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER
-EXPENSES-FIREMANS PICNIC-HUMAN RESOURCES
DEPT
BOOKS-ENGINEERING DEPT
-EXPENSES-FIREMANS PICNIC-HUMAN RESOURCES
DEPT
RESCUE KEYSIHELIUM/VALVE-FIRE DEPT
VAC-ALL EXTENSION TUBES-SEWER DEPT
LETTERING-FIRE DEPT
-SERVICE-PAINTING CAR WASH CEILING & WALLS-~
POLICE BLDG/SERVICE DOORS-FIRE STATION
-TRACT SEARCH-HOUSING REHABILITATION
PROGRAM
DEVELOPER-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
COt1PUTER SOFTWARE UPGRADE-PLANNING DEPT
ASPHALT-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT
CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER
DUES-ASSESSING DEPT
-OCTOBER 92 PAGER SERVICE-STREET MAINT/
UTILITIES DIVISION
LOAD LEVELOR AIR KIT-STREET MAINT
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE
DRAFTING CHAIR-ENGINEERING DEPT
BUSINESS CARDS-ASSESSING DEPT
PUBLICATIONS-POLICE DEPT
DUES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION
DUES-STREET MAINTENANCE
SERVICE-GOAL FACILITATOR-SENIOR CENTER
RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT
-BALL JOINT/CAP ASSEMBLY/SENDER-PARK MAINT/
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
STROBE HEAD-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MINUTES-HUt1AN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION
SKATING LESSONS DIRECTOR/FEES PAID
PEST CONTROL SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER
SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES
-DUST COLLECTOR BAGS/LIME SILO CAPACITY
BINDICATORS-WATER DEPT
219.8:
14.5C
39.4£
76.6~
299.9:
3.2E
20.7£
1476.7C
31.9£
580.0C
162.3C
38.5'
67.9'
103.5:
205.9:
633.2{
1384.5;.
297.91
850.01
136.5
68.5
154.0
5176.7
690.6
595.4
175.0
76.6
3147.6
159.2
348.5
42.8
23.3
250.0
25.0
50.C
350.4
106.~
149.1
75.(
442.t
85.:
1027.f
659.c
OCTOBER 20.1992
29079 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO
29080 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC
29081 BILL OLSON
29082 HARRY ORTLOFF
29083 RON OTTERNESS
29084 PAPER WAREHOUSE
29085 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC
29086 PEPSI COLA COMPANY
29087 PITNEY BOWES INC
29088 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING
29089 PLANNER PADS
29090 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC
29091 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING
29092 PREVENTION PLUS INC
29093 JERRY PROOOEHL
29094 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER SERVICES
29095 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC
29096 REGAL CLEANERS
29097 SCOTT REIN
29098 TED C REIN
29099 REVERE
29100 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC
29101 RITZ CAMERA
29102 THE S T ROBB CO
29103 ROGERS SERVICE
29104 ROSEMOUNT
29105 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO
29106 S & S CRAFTS
29107 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC
29108 SANCO INC
29109 RUSSELL J SAULON
29110 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC
29111 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC
29112 WILBUR W SCHULTZ
29113 SCHWANS SALES
29114 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION
29115 SEH
29116 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
29117 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC
29118 SIGN A RAMA USA
5864336
SILICA SAND-WATER DEPT
TYPEWRITER REPAIR-ASSESSING DEPT .. "
BLACK DIRT-DRAINAGE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 'I,
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID __
-MINNEHAHA BIKE TOUR GUIDE-OUTPDOR CENTER
PROGRAMS --< ,)
-CUPSINAPKINS/BOWLS/PLASTIC TABLE WARE/
-TABLCOVER/SKIRTITAPE/POSTER BOARD-
HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION
GASKETS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUPPLIES-SKATING RINKS PROGRAM
POSTAGE MACHINE SEALANT-POLICE DEPT
REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-FORESTRY DEPT
HAND DRYER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER
-EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/
-ENVELOPES & FORMS-POLICE DEPT/OPEN HOUSE
-FLYER-FIRE DEPTIHALLOWEEN PARTY FLYER-
SOCIAL EVENTS PROGRAM
-SERVICE-INJURY PREVENTION CONSULTING-
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT
CONFERENCE EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE
COMPUTER MONITOR REPLACED-POLICE DEPT
SEPTEMBER 92 WASTE DISPOSAL
BLANKET CLEANING-POLICE DEPT
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
STENCIL KIT/PAINT-WATER DEPT
-SERVICE-WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS/STARING LN
-& SUNRISE CIRCLE STREET & UTILITY DESIGN/
ROWLAND RD CONST/LEONA RD
FILM PROCESSING-FIRE DEPT
DEGREASER/CONTACT CLEANER-WATER DEPT
ALTERNATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT
-SPRAY BAR VALVES/SPRAY NOZZLE-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
-TRAINING SCISSORS/SQUIZZERS/PENCILS-KIDS
KORNER PROGRAM
-TOYS & GAMES-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS
PROGRAM
-CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/
COMMUNITY CENTER
SERVICE-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATRE
MATERIAL FOR CRACK FILLING-STREET MAINT
CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE
SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID
-ICE CREAM FOR SUNBONNET DAY-HISTORICAL &
CULTURAL COMMISSION
LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT
SERVICE-SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY
PAINT-UTILITIES DIVISION
-COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION SERVICE-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
DECALS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
52. 7~
160.9~
•
6E
.5C
35.0C
119.3E
52.3~
156.6C
50.6E
15.0C
44.4C
48.9~
1155.8:
135.0(
15.0(
278.0:
1265.2(
22.5(
942.5(
113.7:
4.~;
6.0;
180.8:
61.1.
410.6
166.3
33.7
184.9
389.5
550.0
112.8
163.2
572.5
143.4
35.~
7924.S'
139.£
2~2.C
•. f
OCTOBER 20.1992
29119 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER -LETTERHEAD-SAFETY DEPT/NOTE CARDS & 245.0C
.9120
ENVELOPES-SENIOR CENTER
SIRCHIE -COMPHOTOFIT SOFTWARE-POLICE FORFEITURE-480.0C
DRUGS "'-'1.
29121 KARY SMITH SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID ~i-:' 52.5C
29122 W GORDON SMITH CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23.4C
29123 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC 1ST AID SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 15.9E
29124 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-DELL ROAD 48.1E
29125 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 148.2C
29126 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-ADMINISTRATION 310.8E
29121 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/FIRE DEPT/ 1619.1E
UTILITIESJDIVISION
29128 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1992 MN SESSION LAW BOOKS-CITY HALL 31.9£
29129 STAT-MEDICAL INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 189.9C
29130 STERLING GROUP INC SERVICE-MARKETCENTER SITE MARKETING PACKET 168.9::
29131 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -FLUORESCENT SPRAY PAINT/LAMPS/RUBBER 225.5E
-SWITCH CAPS/LENSIBATTERY STACKIBULBS-
POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
29132 TARGET STORES -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/HAND VACUUM-95.4:
POLICE DEPT
29133 KATHY TEKIELA BEESWAXIWICKS-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM 45.0C
29134 RYAN THIEL -SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER-ADAPTIVE 40.0(
RECREATION PROGRAM
29135 KEVIN TIMM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 91.5c
29136 TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL INC DIAPHRAGM/SEALING FLANGE LUG-SEWER DEPT 51.1:
29131 E JOHN TROMBLEY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 101. 5(
29138 TURNQUIST INC PAPER TOWELS-FACILITIES DEPT . 403.0t
.9139 TC&W RAILROAD CO SERVICE-TRACK WORK/FLAGMAN-DELL ROAD 52413.1(
9140 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO -OXYGEN/ACETYLENE/LIQUIFIED CARBON DIOXIDEI 161.2:
-NITROGEN-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT/EQUIPMENT
MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER
29141 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 1151.9:
29142 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 193.41
29143 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -NUTS & BOLTSIWASHERS/PIPE COUPLINGS/ 1531.7:
-BUSHINGS/PIPE FITTINGS-PARK MAINT/STREET
MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT
29144 BRENDA UTING MILEAGE-SENIOR CENTER 31.8
29145 STEVE VERN STRUM ROCK CLIMBING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 190.0'
29146 VESSCO INC -PLATE/CONNECTIONS/YOKES/SPRINGSIBELTS-1065.7:
WATER DEPT
29141 VICOM INC -OCTOBER 92 WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-1.01.
COMMUNITY CENTER
29148 TRIA D VIKESLAND MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 11.4'
29149 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-POOL OPERATIONS-COMMUNITY CENTER 116.8
29150 WALOOR PUMP & EQUIP CO WEAR RINGS-SEWER DEPT 232.6
29151 PAT WALKER SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 241.5
29152 WALTERS SWIM SUPPLIES INC KICKBOARDS-POOL LESSONS 93.2
29153 WATERPRO -MARKERS WITH FLAGS/ROD EXTENSIONS/MASONRY 684.9
-SAWBLADES/ROD EXTENSIONS/COPPERHORNS-FIRE
DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION
29154 ~IHEELER CONSOLIDATED INC END SHOE-DRAINAGE CONTROL-STREET MAItIT 29.5
29155 WARREN WOLF -WRENCH/HACKSAW/SOCKET-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 19.4
UTILITIES DIVISION
.9156 X-ERGON CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 251.2
9157 STEVE YOUNG -GAS/CANOE TRIP GUIDE-OUTDOOR CENTER 80.4
PROGRAM
6311162
1-)..~7() ~
29158 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
29159 CRAIG ZEMKE
29160 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
29161 ZIEGLER INC
28492 VOID OUT CHECK
28629 VOID OUT CHECK
28716 VOID OUT CHECK
-342075
-1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/EQUIPMENT
MAINTIUTILITIES DIVISION
REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE
-CHOKE & CARBURETOR CLEANER/CLEANING
SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FITTING-PARK MAINTENANCE
22Li1I
... ~
it·
458.24
100.0C
493.5E .4£
100.0(
2460.71
1915.3E
$1989190.9C
•
•
-', ct, • DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS "
. -~. ,)
10 GENERAL 292641.96
11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 3164.65
15 LIQUOR STORE - P V M 40548.83
17 LIQUOR STORE -PRESERVE 28633.63
18 LIQUOR STORE -PRAIRIEVIE 47943.48
21 POLICE FORFEITURE 5368.35
22 STATE AID CONST 655.56
31 PARK ACGUIST & DEVELOP 1656.60
33 UTILITY BOND FUND 40166.26
36 PIW BLDG -HWY 212 39878.21
37 C/C 2ND SHEET ICE 330122.59
39 92 PARK REF IMP 41270.00
57 RECOVER EXE@( 70106.66
60 IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 13851.31
62 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 960428.20
73 WATER FUND 33020.49
77 SEWER FUND 3403.81
81 TRUST & ESCRm'~ FUND 2809.30
87 COMMUNITY DEVELOP GRANT 62.50
90 TAX INCREMENT CONSTRUCTIO 33458.51
$1989190.90
•
•
•
;
•
•