The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 09/01/1992• • • AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL . PROCLAMATION FOR LITERACY AWARENESS MONTH IN EDEN PRAIRIE I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS A. Reguest frOm Donald Atkins to Speak to. Erosion Problems within the City of Eden Prairie (Continued from August 18, 1992) n. MJNVTES A. B. C. .T oint City CouncillHuman Ri&hts & Services Commission meetina held Tuesday. AulDst 18, 1992 City Council meetina held Tuesday, AuM 18. 1992 City CounciVStaff Workshop Meetina held Tuesday, Aupst 25. 1992 m. CONSENT CALENDAR A. B. Clerk's License List ... ,s •• Final Plat Approval of Bluffs East 12th Addition Oocated west of Franlo Road> Resolution No. 92-188 C. . Enal Plat Approval of Boulder Pointe 4th Addition Oocated south of Mitchell Road) Resolution No. 92-186 D. Approval of Bid for Gradina of Miller Park Page 1807 Page 1808 . Page 1810 Page 1819 Page 1821 Page 1822 Page 1824 Page 1826 City Connell Agenda Tuesday, September 1, 1992 Page Two E. EPal Plat APJ)fOvai of Bell Oaks Estate Oocated on the south side of Riverview Road in Section 36) Resolution No. 92-193 F. Resolution No. 92-194 Summtinl Southwest Metro Transit Commission's Prqgosal to Add Mid-Day Bus Service in the City of Eden Prairie G. AP.m:oval cd' Request from Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to Set a Joint Meetinl (or October .6. 1992 at 6;00 PM IV. PUBLIC HEARlNGSIMEETlNGS A. B. C. Final ASSessment Dearinl for Spoon Ridle Demolition Project, I.C.52-265 (Resolution No. 92-184) CASCADE TOWNHOMES' by Sunset Homes Corporation. Request for POD Concept Review on 60 acres; POD District Review on 6.35 acres with waivers; Zoning District Amendment within the existing RM-6.5 Zoning District on 6.35 acres; Preliminary Plat of 6.35 acres into 18 lots and 3 outlots; Site Plan Review on 6.35 acres. Location: Dell Road and Cascade Drive. (Resolution No. 92-189 -PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 30-92- PUD-7-92 -PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment within the existinl RM-6.5 Zoning District; and Resolution No. 92-190 -Preliminary Plat) VACATION 92-06-Outlot E Preserve COmmercial Park South (Resolution No •. 92-183) V. PAYMENT OFCLAJMS' VI. ORDINANcES AND RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. . Receive 100% Petition from a_ad Development Com.pagy for Storm Sewer Improvements to muffs East 6th. 7th and 11th Additions. I.C. 52-272 (R~lution No. 92-177) VIll. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSION$< & COMMI'ITEES A. Request by the . Historical & Cultural Commission for Additional Fundin& for a Planned Storale Facility at Starina Lake Park (Continued from August 18, 1992) . . Page • .Page 1831 Page 1838 'Page 1839 Page 1841 • Page 1854 Page 1855 Page 1856 . Page 1. City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 1, 1992 Page Three • IX. APPOIN'fMENTS • • A. Appointment of 1 member to the Plannin& Commission to fill an unexPired tenD to 2/28/94 (Continued from August 18, 1992) B. Appointment of 1 member to the Board of ApPeals· & Adjustments to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/94 (Continued from August 18, 1992) X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Mana&er C. 1. Reschedule City Council Meeting of December 1. 1992 to December 8. 1992 (Continued from August 18, 1992) 2. Ordinance No. 32-92. Grantin& a Franchise to Northern States Power <NSPl Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource D. Report of Director of Plannin& E. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Tree Plantin& in the Rint-of-Way (Continued from August 18, 1992) 2. Award Contract for Phase I of Braxton Drive Improvements. I.C. 52-189 (Resolution No. 92-185) F. Report of City Attorney G. Report of Finance Director 1. Lease for Liquor Store"No. 1 XI. OTIlER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT Page 1858 Page 1872 Page 1-904 • • • AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 C~UNCILMEMBERS: WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION: STAFF: I. CALL TO ORDER/INTRODUCTIONS 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock Tim Colli ton (Chair), Cindy Adalbert (Vice- Chair), Sherie Bentley, Sharon Howard, Jan Mosman, Julie Myhre, and Bart Schultz City Manager Carl J. Jullie, and Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson ll. WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ISSUES A • Overview (T. Colliton) B. Accomplishments 1991-1992 (S. Bentley) C. Public Information Activities (J. Myhre, B. Schultz) D. Interaction with Schools (S. Howard) E. Status of Recyclin~ Activities (C. Dawson) F. Or~anized Collection of Refuse and Recyclables (J. Mosman, C. Adalbert) G. Future Directions (T. Colliton) m. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION IV. ADJOURNMENT .' SUMMARy • Articles Submitted to the Eden Prairie Nem by the Eden Prairie Waste Management Commission January, 1991 through July, 1992 Topi<;: Author ~ Genera) Recycling C Adalbert 1/91 Household Hazardous L Ellis 2/91 Waste Battery Recycling D. Evans 3/91 Composting Y. Hargens 4/91 Lawn Care Cherns. C Adalbert 5/91 Packaging Waste Reduction S. Howard 9/91 • Water Conservation J. Myhre 10/91 Pollution Prevention T. Colliton 11/91 Waste Management J. Mosman 12/91 Commission DesCription Lawn Care Chems. C. Adalbert 3/92 Minnesota River J. Myhre 7/92 Pollution Issues • TOTAL P.02 TO: Mayor and City council waste Management Commission FROM: craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager ~ SUBJECT: status of Recycling Efforts DATE: August 28, 1992 Hennepin County requires municipalities to meet several criteria in order to qualify for funding assistance for solid waste abatement acti vi ties, and to remove the threat of County intervention to collect recyclables and bill the City for services. Eden Prairie's system meets these criteria, including: * Collection of newsprint, metal cans, glass, certain plastics, and corrugated cardboard * Collection of yard waste which must have been separated from other refuse * Collection of recyclables on at least a bi-weekly frequency (the City requires weekly collection on the same day as other refuse) * Collection of recyclables from all residential units * Achieving at least 18% reduction of residential waste stream through recovery of recyclables (not counting yard waste) Eden Prairie requires all licensed haulers collecting from residences to make sure that separate collection of recyclables and yard waste is provided. They are responsible for finding users of these commodities. Haulers must also provide their customers with recycling containers approved by the City. Eden Prairie also contracts with Goodwill/Easter Seal to operate an attended drop-off center. It is open every day from 9 am - 5 pm and accepts the standard array of residential recyclables as well as office-grade paper and used clothing and household items. The center is located in the east end of the Menards parking lot. A newspaper-only drop-off container is available on the west side of the Senior Center. With these arrangements, Eden Prairie has the lowest per-capita and per-ton public costs of any recycling system in Hennepin County . • • • • • • Below are figures summarizing the City's residential recycling attainment: (tons) Paper 894 Cans 61 Glass 230 Plastic 2 Mixed Household 136 Recyclables 1323 %·Recycled 10% Yard waste 871 Total Tons 2194 % Abated 16% 1704 137 523 8 243 2617 18% 1063 3680 26% 1870 234 668 64 223 349 3408 23% 1157 4565 31% thru ~ 1036 349 152 49 120 233 1939 *11%/22% 548 2487 *14%/28% Projected 1992 1993 2100 300 675 90 225 400 3790 22% 1100 4890 28% 2200 315 690 90 230 420 3945 22% 1100 5045 28% *First number = percent of annual recycling achieved; second number = current rate of waste recycled Hennepin County is responsible for coordinating business recycling. -,;.- Waste Management Commission City of Eden Prairie August 27, 1992 Page 2 City System Type No. of CoSttO: Recy~le No:jlf EX~(~~~;· ~;Z~I( .:c"co.·':;,) C~;;t &nti.ina·· MonitOr. Longevity Complaints Recycling{ Public. Haulen PubJiQ··· Pick-UP ltem$ .. appJlanceS, etC) i,:~~. \V~lk-ul'> Size ory Sysletl1 ~fSystcm TO:}> Composting Reaction Given •• ',' ... , ..•. Maximuii{< ::::.::::/.:/:" . ... ... , Abatement .... Jordan Bid 5S drive Hauler 6 Spring Clean-No City Curb Max. 2-No City Don't So-So Franchise by fee, up 32 Gal. Know; may (3 year) 51.10 per (because oC (On go to cash garbage record utility centers bag. keeping) bill every 2 months.) Mpls. 1/2 City Consortium 516 Hauler 10 Yes (no Rebate ($7 City Alley 90 Gal. A 21-years City lst 20% with Very 1/2 charge) off water (curb) Cart with problem then recycling good Organized bill) (every lift system. to do Consortium after ht Consortium 2-(supplied accuratel few weeks) by City) y. months. Richfield Open 6 or 7 with Differs Hauler varies Additional No Hauler Both 32 Gal. Survey. 8-years Hauler Don't know Good 3 main ones with charges; Cans done but haulers everything gels not ("",ycling picked up accu9'te portion) SI. Louis Organized 518 Hauler 10 Yes (no Yes City Curb 32 Gal. Bar Code IS years Both City 30% wI Very Park Contract charge) (Rate .± and Hauler recycle Good doubled (on (Supplied (90% when utility by City) particip.) 4S% wI started) bill) compost White Negotiated 511-16 Hauler Yard waste No City Curb Hauler 4-years Good Bear Franchise additional $; will not Lake 59 for No problem (extras (walk-Up seniors materials; by extra Appliances hauler) charge) $25 . • • • • City System Type Brooklyn Customized Park Day Zones Champlin Organized Eden Prairie Zones Open Elk River Negotiated Hastings + Zones Negotiated Franchise, 1-3 years ~ No. of Haulers' 7 6 3 3 Cost to Publi9:t $15-28 $19-27 $15-27 $10-18 • Recycle Pick-up •••... > , Hauler Hauler Hauler Hauler $12.20 Hauler $16.20 $19.20 + 1.50 Cor recycling • Waste Hauler Summary for Ten Twin Cities Suburbs N~:of Extras (leI!ves, ReCycle lteJn~/(.pp~~t~) Credit Given········ 5 6 Drop-off centers Spring Appliance pick- up, $10 separate yard waste varies Yea -Charges One clean-up day per year; Bring to City $2.00 OneH-Hu. waste clean-up day per year, $Ilbag yard waste. appliance pick- up every 2- years No $5 No (Varies) Charge for recycling noted on bill N/A Sec Cost Column Haulers Curb City Both Hauler Both City - hesdach e Hauler Curb No Controla 32-90 Gal. 32-60 Gal. 32-90 Gal. 90 Gal. Monitor. Systeni···· :. Longevity oCSysicm .... Occasion 5 yean -ally Yes No 2 yean No 2 yean • Waste Management Commission City of Eden Prairie August 27, 1992 Page 1 Complaints To: City then Hauler Hauler City Hauler, City Recycling! Composling Abatement 25% Recycled 30% Yard Waste Don't Know Don't Know Public Resction O.K. • • • July 20, 1992 Eden Prairie Mayor and Council Members, In regards to soil erosion in Eden Prairie, approximately one year ago I was heard by the Mayor and the City Council regarding this issue. At that time, it was stated that Engineering would look into this problem. However, as of this writing, nothing has been done to rectify the eroding of soils. I strongly feel that a new Ordinance should be created and put into effect. Also, everyone puts Jeff Johnson in a bad situation by expecting him to follow their instructions without erosion control laws. Priority of Problems: 1. All disturbed areas should be seeded within one week of disturbance with a temporary seed (a) rye grain, or (b) rye grass. 2. Silt fence needs to be installed in accordance with the following specifications and Minnesota State specifications: A. A trench shall be excavated 6" horizontally and 6" latterally. Fabric will be extended into this trench with 2' above the ground . B. Stakes will be placed 4' apart. C. Fabric secured to the stakes with lath and nails. D~ Trench will be covered with the excavated soil and compacted. 3. Water drainage through soil is inadequate in that when land is re-molded, water still takes its natural course. Therefore, even though a design for run-off applications has been done, water may still need to take a natural course to run off. Thank you for your time in considering my concerns. Sincerely, Donald Atkins iDOl UNAPPROVED MINUTES • .JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1992 6:00 P.M. -CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock COMMISSION MEMBERS: Bette Anderson, Virginia Gartner, Pete Iversen, Dacia Henderson, William Jackson, K. Ramakrishnan, Judy Schuck, Linda Senes, and Ross Thorfmnson, Jr. COUNCIL AND COMMISSION STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Director of Human Resources and Community Services Natalie Swaggert, and Communications Coordinator Karen Michael I. CALL TO ORDER •• • Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. Gartner, Jackson, and Ramakrishnan were absent. RESPONSE TO COUNCIL REQUEST TO REVIEW STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION In response to the discussion with the Council at the joint meeting held July 7, 1992, the Commission had prepared a plan to restructure the Commission around its two main responsibilities of Human Rights and Human Services. The plan would bring more people into the Commission process, allow the City to deal more effectively with two growing areas of need, provide a pool of experienced people from which to draw for future Commission openings, provide greater visibility of the Commission's activities in the City, and still maintain identity of the Commission as it was originally conceived. The plan provided for support of two permanent committees, one on Human Rights and one on Human Services, with four additional citizens to be appointed to each as "committee members." Both committees would meet monthly and consist of four committee members and four Commission members, each, focusing on either Human Rights or Human Services. The only negative feature of the plan was that the Commissioners would be meeting twice as often as currently; however, the sense of the Commissioners was that they would be able to accomplish much more in this format. - Council members concurred that the proposed plan was a good response to their concerns, and that it could be implemented immediately, without amendment to the City Code. Upon further discussion, it was determined that a special appointment process would be set up for the committee members instead of waiting until March to fill the positions. I 'lOt Joint Meeting of City Council and Human Rights & Services Commission 2 August 18, 199. Council members suggested a test period of two years for the proposed plan, with a review to take place within one year. The Council would be looking to the results of this plan for implementation by other commissions with similar dual responsibilities, such as Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources and the Historical and Cultural Commissions. Council directed Staff to work with the Commissioners on implementation of an appointment process for the committee members with appointments to take place in October, 1992. Mayor Tenpas adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m. • • UNAPPROVED l\.fINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL ~DAY, AUGUST 18, 1992 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, Police Chief Jim Clark, and Natalie Swaggert, Director of Human Resources and Community Services PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. All members were present. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIRST PLACE AWARD, REGION 12, TO OFFICER JIM: DeMANN AND .CHAMP, HIS CANINE PARTNER Police Officer Jim DeMann and his Police Canine, Champ, placed first in the Region 12 competition for the United States Police Canine Association. Officer DeMann and Champ shared the trophy with the Council prior to the meeting. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS·OF BUSINESS Jullie added item m.l. W ALGREENS. by Semper Holdings. Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 31-92. Zoning District change from RM-6.5 to Neighborhood Commercial on 0.34 acres and Zoning District Chamge from Community Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.24 acres: Approval of Developer's Agreement for Walgreens; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-182. Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 31-92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary: and Adoption of Resolution No. 92- 181. Approving Site Plan for Walgreens on 1.58 acres. Location: County Road No.4 and Terrey Pine Drive (Ordinance No. 31-92. Zonin2 District Chan2e from RM-6.S and Community Commercial to Nei2hborhood Commercial: Resolution No. 92-182, Authorizin2 Summary and Publication; Resolution No. 92-181, Site Plan) and X.B.S., Update on CPT Purchase. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES • A. Joint City Council/Historical & Cultural Commission meetin2 held Tuesday, Au2Ust 4, 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the Joint Meeting with Historical & Cultural Commission of August 4, 1992, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously • . "7/) City Council Meeting 2 August 18, 1992 B. City Council meetin& held Tuesday. Auwst 4. 1992 • MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the minutes of the Council Meeting of August 4, 1992, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. m. CONSENT CALENDAR A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. Clerk's License List Herita&e Preservation Commission Approval of Documents for Hiehway 212 EIS Final Plat Approval of Sprineer-Klooster Addition Oocated south of TIl 5 and north of Mitchell Lake) (Resolution No. 92-178) Receive Bids for Reeional Center Road Improvements. I.C. 52-257 (Resolution No. 92-179) Approval of Resolution No. 92-148. Appointine Election .Judees for the September 15. 1992 Primary Election Authorizine Mayor & City Manaeer To Execute Subrecipient Aereements for the Community Development Block Grant Proeram (Resolution No. 92-152) Recommend A ward of Contract to Purchase Ice Resurfacer • Resolution No. 92-180 Declarine Costs to be Assessed and Orderine Preparation of Proposed Special Assessment Rolls for Spoon Ridee Demolition Project ffiearine Scheduled for September 1. 1992) WALGREENS, by Semper Holdings, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 31-92, Zoning District chamge from RM-6.5 to Neighborhood Commercial on 0.34 acres and Zoning District Chamge from Community Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.24 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Walgreens; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-182, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 31-92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-181, Approving Site Plan for Walgreens on 1.58 acres. Location: County Road No.4 and Terrey Pine Drive (Ordinance No. 31-92, Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 and Community Commercial to Neighborhood Commercial; Resolution No. 92-182, Authorizing Summary and Publication; Resolution No. 92-181, Site Plan) MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve items A - I on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. J.' IV • PUBLIC HEARINGSlMEETINGS A. FAIRFIELD WEST by Centex Homes. Request for rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 23.5 acres. Preliminary Plat of 23.5 acres into 41 lots, 2 outlots and road right-of-way. Location: west. Fairfield, south of Scenic Heights Road/Highway No. 212. (Ordinance No. 29-92 -Zoning Distn Change from Rural to RI-13.5; and Resolution No. 92-167 -Preliminary Plat) Continued from August 4, 1992 /0 II City Council Meeting 3 August 18, 1992 • • • This item was continued from August 4th to allow time for the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to hold a Public Meeting regarding the "big woods" on August 17th. Lambert reported that, at its meeting following the tour, the Commission voted to recommend denial of the Fairfield project and further recommended the City purchase all the property owned by Tandem Corporation through private funding sources by May 15, 1993. Jiin Ostenson, Tandem Properties, owner of the property, presented a revised plan eliminating the seven lots west of Candlewood Parkway, thereby limiting construction to the open area and to the least desirable portion of the "big woods" consisting of about three acres. Ostenson said Tandem and Centex, the developer, were willing to proceed with this revised development, only, for now. Tandem would then withhold the rest of their property from development for a period of time to allow an opportunity to explore options to purchase the balance of the property. He explained that Tandem did not own all of the "big woods" and showed the location of the other parcels, noting the owners involved. He added that the Tandem land was valued between $2.4 million to $3.5 million, in addition to which there were substantial special assessments existing on the property that would also need to be paid. Art Weeks, Chair of Heritage Preservation Commission, reported that the Commission had participated in the tour and concluded there was probable cause to designate this land, or a portion of it, as a heritage preservation site. He explained the process necessary through the State Historical Preservation Office, noting that tree cutting could be precluded in designated areas; however, it would not preclude development altogether. Weeks was unsure whether such a designation would be considered a "taking" as was determined in a recently decided court case based on a similarly designated parcel of land. Council members raised questions regarding availability of funding sources; whether other such sites existed in Eden Prairie; how many sites existed in the State of Minnesota; the amount of tree loss from the revised plan; and timing issues involving the requested Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Lambert said that, for fifteen years, he had been monitoring grants and donations hoping to purchase the "big woods." He said the major difficulty had been that the site was not considered to be of regional significance; therefore, funding was limited or non-existent. He added that, while other sites existed in the City, none were of this size. Lambert explained that Kurt Rusterholtz, the Forest Ecologist who accompanied the group on the tour of the woods, had told the group there were originally about 3,400 square miles of "big woods" in Minnesota, but currently there were about 3,400 acres remaining. Most of the stands of "big woods, " ranging from 10 to 600 acres, were in protected ownership of the State, County, or other park system. Ostenson explained that the amount of tree loss exclusive of public streets would be reduced approximately 3-4% with the revised proposal, leaving an additional 3.5 acres of the woods undeveloped . Pauly explained the timing factors involved with the requested EA W, and acknowledged that State Statute allowed the City only 120 days from the date of application in which to act on the preliminary . plat before it would be automatically approved. Ostenson said the area had already been extensively / <f-' , (' j " j ,l... --------------------------~~-----~~---- City Council Meeting 4 August 18, 1992 reviewed through a variety of processes, including the Environmental Impact Statement prepared fO. the upgrading of Highway No. 212 by the Minnesota Department of Transportation; therefore, h expected that there may be no finding of a need for an EA W. Diane Lynch and Claire Hilgeman, members of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, discussed the findings of the tour held the previous night. They related the facts given by Rusterholtz, and explained plans to raise money to purchase the woods by implementation of a grass roots fund raising campaign. Councilmembers asked questions about the experience of the Commission with fund raising and how this particular parcel of land ranked amongst all other natural resources in the community, such as the Minnesota River Valley. Lynch responded that she was unaware of anyone on the Commission with such fund raising experience but believed the simplicity of raising $42 per person on a one time basis would work. She added that the Commission had not prioritized this natural resource amongst others like the Minnesota River Valley, but she believed it was because the majority of people were unaware of its existence. Lynch emphasized that the request of the Council at this point was for more time to see if raising funds privately was feasible. Jackie McMillan, 7924 Island Road, President of the homeowners' association in this area, said she had faxed a petition with 75 signatures to the Environmental Quality Board requesting an EA W be prepared on the property. • Chuck Willcox, 16427 South Manor Road, Ken Brown, 6840 Parkview Lane, Scott Wallace, 12465 Sunnybrook Road, Pat Minton, 7994 Island Road, Cindy Eyden, 6885 -192nd Avenue West, Gerard Wersal, 12645 Sunnybrook Road, and George Grantier, 6266 Rainbow Drive, spoke to preservation of this natural resource and asked for time to explore options to fund the purchase of the property. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Council members discussed several concerns, including: preservation of the natural resource; difficulty of funding such a purchase from City funds at a time when budgets were becoming tighter and resources less available; fair treatment of the developer and the property owner; possibilities of forming partnerships with the private sector to preserve the woods; provision of an adequate street connection for the existing neighborhoods with extension of Candlewood Parkway to the north; and consideration of a zoning district with larger lot sizes for greater protection of the woods. Councilmembers concurred that the funding was not available from the City's budget, nor would it be in the future. They agreed that, if an additional $3 - 4 million was available, it would likely be designated toward human service needs such as housing and other needed services, rather than parkland purchases. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to: • 1) Adopt 1st reading of Ordinance No. 29-92 for rezoning; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-167, approving the preliminary plat; and City Council Meeting 5 August IS, 1992 • B. • • 3) Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations, and with the added condition that there shall be no development proposal submitted for the remaining acreage of the "big woods" owned by Tandem and others located west of Fairfield West until May 15, 1993, in order to assess the possibility of funding purchase of the land through private sources. Motion failed with Anderson and Pidcock voting against. Tenpas called a recess at 9:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:05 p.m. MOTION TO RECONSIDER TIlE PREVIOUS MOTION was made by Pidcock, seconded by Anderson. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmembers continued their discussion of legal concerns of any decision made at this time on this proposal. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson continue the item to September 15, 1992, and seek advice from the City Attorney regarding timing for actions. Motion carried unanimously. MARSH CREEK GOLF COURSE by Sienna Corporation. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Public Open Space to Low Density Residential on 60 acres, and to relocate Dell Road and Scenic Heights Road; and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review on 419 acres. Location: East of Riley Lake, north of Pioneer Trail. (Resolution No. 92-174 -Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; and Resolution No. 92-175 -PUD Concept Review) Rick Packer, Sienna Corporation, explained the development request for a professionally-designed golf course and a swim and tennis club, combined with 250-350 upper-bracket, single-family houses. Packer stated that private streets were proposed and would be constructed to City standards, with emergency access points in several locations. He said the streets were proposed without sidewalks as a preferred condition in this type of neighborhood based on previous experience. Packer related that he had no control over dedication of the three outlots at the lake as their purchase agreement with the owner prohibited such dedication. Enger reported that the Planning Commission considered this proposal at three meetings, with a unanimous recommendation to approve the proposal with several conditions on July 27th. He explained that, since this was a PUD Concept, only, the detailed plans would be reviewed at a later date, including an EA W, preliminary plat, preservation plans for wetlands and woodlands, and final road alignments. He pointed out that the sidewalks were recommended for safety of pedestrians, particularly, school children. - Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission considered the proposal at two meetings and unanimously recommended approval of the project with conditions on August 3, 1992. He noted that the Commission felt sidewalks were not necessary as long as the streets were private; however, it was recommended that the developer's agreement include a condition that the sidewalks must be constructed prior to the City ever accepting the streets for public maintenance. The Commission also discussed the relocation of the trail as proposed by the developer, and agreed that dedication of the outlots along Riley Lake would be a suitable "trade" for moving the trail out of the creek bed, which was a more desirable location for the trail. 111 Y City Council Meeting 6 August 18, 1992 Councilmembers asked questions regarding why the property owner was reluctant to dedicate tl)A outlots and whether there was any room for negotiation on the matter and regarding trail access. f~ the residents of the development and for the public through the property. Paul Anderson, attorney for Elaine Jacques, owner of the outlots, expressed her concerns rel~ding a desire for a buffer from the noise of a park and for provision of a permanent access for her family to Riley Lake in the future. Anderson suggested that it may be possible to negotiate with her further. Packer stated that the public trails within the development would, of course, be available at all times for public use; however, if the public wished to use the private trail connections of the development which were designed to connect the residents within the development to the public trails, they would be asked to check in at the main gate. Wally Anderson, 9014 Riley Lake Road, stated he was generally in favor of the project, but concerned about the activities at Riley Lake, including drinking, loud music, foul language, and disregard for parking regulations, which interfered with the normal neighborhood traffic. He believed it would not be in the best interest of the neighborhood to add land to the park given the present activities. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. • John Bushey, 9000 Riley Lake Road, expressed concern about private roads, location of the trail for safety purposes, water quality, and adequate erosion control, and he agreed with Anderson regarding problems in Riley Lake Park. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Council members discussed several considerations for the PUD, directing as follows: further negotiations should be attempted with Mrs. Jacques regarding the outlots; the trail location should be safe and in the best location for use of the residents; public trails within the development should be accessible to the public at all times; the wetlands, including special vegetation like the cranberry bog, should be preserved; the school district should review and comment on the street patterns, particularly the size of the proposed cul-de-sacs for bus maneuvering; and, the private streets may be constructed without sidewalks at this time, but, a condition should be included in the developer's agreement requiring that the sidewalks will be constructed prior to acceptance of any street for public maintenance by the City. " MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 92-174 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-175 for Approval of the pun Concept Review; and • 3) Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations, and including the directions by Council as discussed at this meeting. tIlt) City Council Meeting 7 August 18, 1992 • C. Motion carried unanimously. GLENSHIRE by Associated Investment. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change on 4 acres from Church to Medium Density Residential; PUD Concept Review on 30.6 acres; PUD District Review on 6.1 acres with waivers; Rezoning from Rural to RI-9.5 on 6.1 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 6.1 acres into 19 lots and road right-of-way. Location: East of Edenvale Boulevard, north of Valley View Road. (Resolution No. 92-168 -Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; Resolution No. 92-169 -PUD Concept Review; Ordinance No. 28-92-PUD-S-92 -PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RI-9.S; and Resolution No. 92-170 -Preliminary Plat) Tom Robertson, Associated Investment, reviewed the request to develop 19 single-family residential lots. Enger reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal at its June 22nd; Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission also recommended approval at its July 6th meeting. There were no comments from members of the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to: 1) Close the Public Hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-168 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 92-169 to approve the PUD Concept Review; • 4) Approve lst Reading of Ordinance No. 28-92-PUD-5-92 for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RI-9.5; 5) Adopt Resolution No. 92-170 to Approve the Preliminary Plat; and 6) Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Harris, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voting "aye." VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIT. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. • Request from Donald Atkins to Speak to Erosion Problems within the City of Eden Prairie (Continued to September 1, 1992) VID. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES A. Presentation on South Hennepin Re~ional Plannin~ A~ency Work Plan ,. <~f f ,: if, If .' ': ~'-" City Council Meeting 8 August 18, 1992 South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency presented its work plan for the next twelve months. whi. had been endorsed by the Human Rights & Services Commission in August. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency 1992-93 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. B. Request by the Historical & Cultural Commission for Additional Fundine for a Planned Storaee Facility at Starine Lake Park (Continued to September 1, 1992) IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of 1 member to the Plannine Commission to fill an uriexpired term to 2/28/94 (Continued to September 1, 1992) B. Appointment of 1 member to the Board of Appeals & Adiustments to fill an unexpired term to 2/28/94 (Continued to September 1, 1992) X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. Mayor Tenpas -Discussion on Per Diem for CounciImembers (Continued to September 1, 1992) B. Report of City Manaeer 1. Cultural Diversity Proeram Proposal • Swaggert and Clark presented a proposal on integrating cultural diversity issues in a number of areas of the City'S operations. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the proposed Cultural Diversity Program dated August 3, 1992, and to direct Staff to begin implementation of the program based on the directions outlined in the program. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Set Aueust 25. 1992 as Date for ManaeementlCouncil Workshop Council members concurred with the arrangements set for the next Council/StaffWorkshop to be held on August 25, 1992 from 5:30 to 9:00 p.m. at the Eden Prairie Senior Center . •• 0 3. Reschedule City Council Meetine of December 1. 1992 to December 8. 1992 (Continued to September 1, 1992) 4. Reguest from Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to Set a Joint Meetine for October 6. 1992 at 6:00 PM (Continued to September 1, 1992) • 11/1 City Council Meeting 9 August 18, 1992 • C. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource 1. Recommend A ward of Contract for Construction of Community Center Entry Earlier this year, Council authorized a renovation of the Community Center entrance and access. Staff reviewed the details involved in the bid to be awarded. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to award the contract for the Community Center entry renovation to Shingobee Construction for $235,144, with alternatives as recommended by Staff. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Tree PlantinK in the RiKht-of-Way (Continued to September 1, 1992) XI. OrnER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT • • MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Harris, seconded by Anderson. Mayor Tenpas adjourned the meeting at 11:45 p.m. 11J<t • MINUTES SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 1992 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: 5:30 PM, OUTDOOR CENTER 13765 Staring Lake Parkway Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl I. Iullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, City Engineer AI Gray, Police Chief Jim Clark, Director of Human Resources & Community Services Natalie Swaggert, City Assessor Steve Sinell, Director of Inspections, Safety & Facilities Kevin Schmieg, Finance Operations Manager Maxine Brueck, and Finance Senior Accountant Sara Ruth • CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL • The meeting began at 5:30 PM. All Councilmembers were present. I. UPDATE ON CPT BUILDING ACOUISITION Jullie noted that C. H. Robinson had signed a letter of understanding about commitments it and the HRA would make should the HRA become the owner of the building. Brian Cluts of Cluts O'Brien Strother Architects, presented several drawings to explain general space planning and site reconfigurations. He identified users and their locations in the building, including the space requirements due to the understanding with C. H. Robinson. Other matter included alternates for entries, site revisions, and ADA compliance. He also discussed costs associated with the City's use and need to remodel its space. Jullie mentioned that the Minnesota Department of Corrections had raised some issues regarding the relocation of the holding cells from the Police Station to the CPT building. He related that meetings were scheduled with Norwest Bank for modifications in the price of the property . /1:9 Special City Council Meeting August 25, 1992 Page Two ll. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY STUDy Gray presented an overview of the philosophy and components of a surface water management utility. The goal of City initiatives in this area would be to maintain and improve water quality. Staff has been working with the engineers of the watershed districts in the City to identify better the responsibilities of the agencies. He presented a revised schedule for formal consideration of the utility: on November 17, 1992, the Council could set December 15, 1992 as the date for a public hearing regarding establishment of the utility. Jessen asked if having such a system would provide the State a mechanism to delegate its mandate to administer NPDES permits. (He reminded staff that the City will need to submit its NPDES permit by October 1, 1992.) Harris observed that the state and federal government were talking more and more about pushing implementation responsibilities down to the local level. Council members concurred with the schedule proposed by staff. Jullie said that utility bills would be expanded to include a line not only for the surface water management utility, but also for a recycling utility. Dawson related that changes in Hennepin County funding policy had the effect of making possible an estimated $18/yr. rebate to single-family through eight-plex residential properties for recycling and yard waste activities. ID. PRELIl\flNARY 1993 CITY BUDGET Jullie gave a lengthy summary of the highlights of the proposed budget and property tax levy for 1993. The proposed net levy was approximately $12.8 million, or a 5.5 percent increase above the net levy adopted for 1992 in order to accommodate population growth and inflation. Sinell assisted in explaining the reasons for and effects of the decline in taxable value for 1993. Councilmembers requested staff to study additional arrangements for legal services. They indicated that some deferral of capital purchases and major studies could be delayed. They also agreed that the reservation of fund balance for city hall acquisition should be revisited, and noted that the City may be in a better long-term position by taking advantage of low financing costs available at this time. Council members also identified several items which interested them individually and requested that staff follow up. '.'- Dawson reminded the Council that it needed to adopt a maximum tax levy and proposed budget by September 15. Council members decided not to have any additional meetings for this phase of the budget process until their regularly-scheduled meeting on September 15. IV. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 PM. /1Jo • • • • • • . , CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST September 1, 1992 CONTRACTOR (Iv1ULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Caliber Development Corporation Penn-Co Construction, Inc. Superamerica Group, Inc. PLUMBER Accent Service Plumbing iJorthridge Plumbing Co. Pokorny Company GAS FITTER Pokorny Company HEATPIG & VENTILATING All Season Comfort, Inc. Poko rny Company FOOD VEHICLE Snack Attack Delivery Service, Inc. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. QJ~ Pa t Sol iii Licensing 17)1 • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-188 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BLUFFS EAST 12TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Bluffs East 12th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Bluffs East 12th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated August 27, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 1, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: DATE; r Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technicianc:~ August 27, 1992 SUBJECT: Final Plat of Bluffs East 12th Addition PROPOSAL: The Bluffs Company has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Bluffs East 12th Addition. Located west of Franlo Road, east of Antlers Ridge along the extension of Meade Lane, the plat contains 12.47 acres to be divided into 28 single family lots, one outlot and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. This proposal is a subdivision of Outlot C, Bluffs East 5th Addition. mSTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council May 5, 1992, per Resolution No. 92-87. Second reading of Ordinance No. 11-92, Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5, was finally read and approved June 2, 1992. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed June 2, 1992. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. • UTILITIES AND STREETS: The owners submitted a 100% Petition to the City for the installation of all municipal streets, utilities and walkways within this project. The public improvements within this project • are substantially complete at this time. As outlined in the Developer's Agreement, the Developers have agreed to enter into a special assessment agreement with the City to cover construction costs of all public improvements within this project prior to release of the final plat. The proposed drainage and utility easement between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2 must be revised to 10 feet in width in order to accommodate existing storm sewer line. PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will be in conformance with the requirements of City Code and the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding will be in conformance with the requirements of City Code and the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Bluffs East 12th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: JJ:ssa 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $637. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $3,888. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,120. Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for the cost of public improvements. Revision of drainage and utility easement in Lots 3 and 4, Block 2. cc: Beth Simonsted, Hustad Development Hedlund Engineering I?r;, • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-186 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BOULDER POINTE 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Boulder Pointe 4th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Boulder Pointe 4th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated August 27, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat . C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 1, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council members THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer " .......... , FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technici~ . ..ll.->,' DATE: -) _.j August 27, 1992 SUBJECT: Final Plat or Boulder Pointe 4th Addition PROPOSAL: The Developer, Robert H. Mason, Inc., has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Boulder Pointe 4th Addition. Located south of Mitchell Road and west of Twin Lakes Crossing, the plat contains 13.5 acres to be divided into 24 single family lots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. This proposal is a subdivision of Outlot A Boulder Pointe 3rd Addition. mSTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by City Council August 6, 1991 per Resolution No. 91- 179. Second reading of Ordinance No. 23-91, Zoning District Change to RI-13.5 was finally read and approved at the City Council meeting held August 20, 1991. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed August 20, 1991. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal streets, utilities and walkways will be installed throughout this project in conformance with the requirements of City Code and the Developer's Agreement. In an attempt to reduce similar sounding street names within Eden Prairie, it is recommended that the Developer revise the street name "Westhill Pointe". PARK DEDICATION: Park dedication will be in conformance with the requirements of City Code and the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding for all public streets and utilities will be in conformance with City Code and must be provided prior to release of the final plat. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Boulder Pointe 4th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $739. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $4,266. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $960. 4. Revision of street name. 5. Satisfaction on bonding requirements. JJ:ssa cc: Robert Mason Homes Schoell & Madson, Inc. • • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect~ August 26, 1992 Recommendation to Award Grading Contract for First Phase Construction at Miller Park Bids for the first phase of construction at Miller Park were received and opened Monday, August 24, 1992. Three bids were received with the following results: • • • Imperial Developers, Inc. DLR Excavating, Inc. Enebak Construction Company $432,782.50 $512,146.50 $548,227.00 A detailed bid summary has been included for your review. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Imperial Developers, Inc. in the Amount of $432.782.50. Construction of Miller Park can begin the first week in September, or as soon as Council approval is completed, contracts are signed and a preconstruction meeting is held. BPC:mdd l~l/~{P r v BID SUMMARY Miller Park 8124192 #1 #2 #3 Eden Prairie, Minnesota En~neer'sEstimate I Imperial Developers, Inc. I DLR Excavating, Inc. II Enebak Construction Co. I! GRADING Est Unit Unit Unit 1 Unit 1 No. Description Qty. Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total I. Price Total 1 1. Erosion Control Fence 8,750 Lin.Fl S1.75 S15,312.50 S1.30 SII,375.oo S1.35 Sl1,812.50 S1.35 SII.812.50 1 2. Oear and Grub (approximately 3 acres) 1 Lump Sum S7,500.00 S7,5oo.oo SI2,OOO.OO S12,OOO.00 $6,000.00 S6,OOO.00 S6,OOO.OO S6,OOO.00 1 3. Snow Fence (for tree protection) 2,900 Lin.Ft S2.00 S5,8oo.00 S2.OO S5,8oo.oo S1.65 $4,785.00 S1.65 $4,785.00 4. Debris Removal 1 Lump Sum SI,OOO.oo SI,ooo.oo S3,5OO.OO S3,5OO.OO SI,ooo.oo " SI,ooo.oo S3,OOO.OO S3,OOO.00 5. Site Grading 1 Lump Sum 5344,500.00 5344,500.00 5225,000.00 5225,000.00 S300,OOO.00 5300,000.00 5275,000.00 S275,OOO.00 6. Subgrade Correction 20,000 Cu.Yds. S3.50 S70,ooo.00 SUO 522,000.00 SO.80 S16,OOO.00 SUO S22.OOO.OO 7. Interim Seeding 81 Acres S500.00 $40,500.00 S250.OO S20,250.OO 5324.00 526,244.00 S324.00 S26,244.OO 8. Adjust Manhole Structure 2 Each S325.OO S650.00 S5OO.00 51,000.00 S500.00 SI,ooo.oo S5oo.00 SI,ooo.oo 9. Adjust Manhole Casting' 2 Each SI50.00 S3oo.oo S500.00 SI,OOO.oo S150.OO S3OO.OO S300.00 S600.OO ====== ==--==--= ==== ======== Grading $485,562.50 Grading S301,925.OO Gradinll S367,141.50 Grading S350.441.50 Enllineer'sEstimate I Imperial Developers, Inc. I DLR Excavatinll, Inc. I Enebak Construction Co. I WATER MAIN Est Unit Unit Unit Unit No. Description Qty. Unit Price Total Price Total Price Total Price Total 1. Relocate Water Main 230 Lin.Ft S30.OO S6,9OO.OO S20.OO $4,600.00 S20.OO $4,600.00 SI0.00 S2,3OO.OO 2. 16" DIP CL. 52 20 Lin.Ft 538.00 S760.OO S50.00 SI,ooo.oo 575.00 SI,500.oo 530.00 S600.OO 3. 8" DIP CL. 52 20 Lin. Ft. 525.00 S5oo.oo $40.00 5800.00 $40.00 S8OO.OO 517.00 S340.oo 4. 6" DIP CL. 52 20 Lin.Ft S23.oo $460.00 I S30.OO 5600.00 532.00 S64O.OO S15.OO S3OO.OO 5. MJ Fittings 800 Lb. S1.25 SI,ooo.oo I 52.00 51,600.00 52.00 SI,600.oo 51.00 S8OO.OO 6. Plastic FiIm Wrap 260 Lin.Ft SO.80 S208.OO 1 S1.00 S260.OO S5.OO SI,3oo.oo S1.00 5260.00 7. 16" Butterfly Valve 1 Each SI,775.00 SI,775.00 1 .'. SI,500.00 SI,5oo.oo I S2,OOO.00 52,000.00 S3,OOO.00 53,000.00 8. Insulation (1" thick) 500 Sq.Ft S1.50 S750.00 1 50.50 5250.00 1 S1.00 5500.00 I S1.00 5500.00 9. Insulation (2" thick) 1,000 Sq.Fl S2.OO S2,OOO.OO 1 S1.00 SI,ooo.oo I SI.50 SI,5oo.oo I S1.60 51,600.00 ====== 1 =====1 ====== 1 ======== Water Main SI4,353.00 1 Water Main Sl1,610.oo 1 Water Main 514.440.00 1 Water Main 59.700.00 • • • --~ ;?~ ~J • Miller Park SANITARY SEWER No. Description I. Standard 48" Diameter Manhole (0-8') 2. Extra Depth 48" Manhole 3. Outside Drop Section 4. 8" PVC Sanitary SDR 26 (16-18,) 5. 8" PVC Sanitary SDR 26 (18-20') 6. 8" PVC Sanitary SDR 26 (20-22') 7. 8" PVC Sanitary SDR 26 (22-24') 8. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (20-22,) 9. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (22-24') 10. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (24-26') 11. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (26-28,) 12. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (28-30,) 13. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (30-32,) 14. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (32-34') 15. 8" DIP Sanitary 0... 54 (34-36') 16. 6"x 8" DIP Wye and Riser 17. Plastic Film Wrap 18. Pipe Bedding 19. Conversion of Existing Lift Station 20. Connect to EXisting Riser at MWCC MH .,. , Est Qty. 5 89.90 33.40 92 87 286 115 61 92 64 221 507 96 32 84 1 1,157 200 1 1 • Engineer'sEstimate I I Unit Unit Price Total Each $975.00 $4,875.00 LinFt 565.00 $5,843.50 LinFt 5135.00 $4,509.00 LinFt 518.00 $1,656.00 LinFL 521.00 51,827.00 LinFL S24.00 $6,864.00 LinFL $27.00 53,105.00 LinFL 528.00 51,708.00 LinFL 530.00 52,760.00 LinFL 535.00 52,240.00 LinFL $40.00 $8,840.00 LinFL $45.00 522,815.00 LinFL 555.00 55,280.00 LinFL 560.00 51,920.00 LinFL 565.00 55,460.00 Lump Sum $400.00 $400.00 LinFL 50.70 S809.90 Tons 58.00 $1,600.00 Lump Sum $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Lump Sum 51,500.00 51,500.00 ======= Sanitary Sewer $88,012.40 En.rdneer'sEstimate I Grading $485,562.50 Water Main 514,353.00 Sanitary Sewer 588,012.40 ==== Total Bid 5587,927.90 • I Imperial Developers, Inc. I DLR Excavating, Inc. II Enebak Construction CO. II Unit Unit I Unit I Price Total Price Total I Price Total I $1,100.00 $5,500.00 $750.00 S3,750.00 I $3,000.00 515,000.00 I $80.00 S7,192.00 5100.00 S8,990.00 I S65.00 55,843.50 I $100.00 S3,34O.00 5100.00 53,340.00 I SIOO.OO S3,34O.00 I 528.00 52,576.00 $48.00 $4,416.00 I S50.00 $4,600.00 I 532.00 52,784.00 551.00 $4,437.00 I $50.00 $4,350.00 I " $35.00 $10,010.00 551.00 514,586.00 I 550.00 514.300.00 I 539.00 $4,485.00 552.00 S5,980.00 I S50.00 55,750.00 I $49.00 52,989.00 $58.00 S3,538.00 I S85.00 S5,185.00 553.00 $4,876.00 560.00 S5,520.00 I S85.00 S7,820.00 S57.00 S3,648.00 560.00 S3,84O.00 I S85.00 S5,44O.00 562.00 $13,702.00 S60.00 513,260.00 I S85.00 518.785.00 S67.00 533,969.00 S65.00 532,955.00 I S85.00 543,095.00 S72.00 56,912.00 565.00 S6,240.00 I S85.00 S8,160.00 577.00 52,464.00 I 568.00 S2,176.00 I S85.00 S2,720.00 S83.00 S6,972.00 570.00 S5,880.00 I S85.00 S7,140.00 S750.00 5750.00 51,500.00 51,500.00 53,000.00 S3,OOO.00 SO.50 S578.50 51.00 SI,157.00 SI.OO SI,157.00 SI0.00 S2,OOO.00 510.00 S2,OOO.00 SI2.00 S2,400.00 S3,500.00 S3,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 S15,OOO.00 SI5,000.00 SI,OOO.OO 51,000.00 52,500.00 S2,500.00 S15,OOO.00 S15,OOO.00 ======= ====== ======== U1itary Sewer 5119,247.50 anitary Sewer 5130,565.00 ~itary Sewer S188,085.50 Imperial Developers, Inc. I DLR Excavating, Inc. J Enebak Construction Co. I Grading 5301,925.00 Grading 5367,141.50 Grading 5350,44 1.50 I Water Main 511,610.00 Water Main SI4,440.00 Water Main S9,700.00 I mitary Sewer 5119,247.50 anitary Sewer 5130,565.00 ~itary Sewer 5188,085.50 I ===== ===== I ======== I Total Bid $432,782.50 Total Bid $512,146.50 I Total Bid 5548,227.00 I • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-193 (Revised Resolution No. 91-108) A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BELL OAKS ESTATE WHEREAS, the plat of Bell Oaks Estate has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Bell Oak Estate is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated August 27, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat . c. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 1, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer • FROM: DATE: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering T<chnici.& August 27, 1992 SUBJECT: Bell Oaks Estate PROPOSAL: Bell Oaks Company has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Bell Oaks Estate, a single family residential subdivision located south of Riverview Road in the South Half of Section 36. The plat contains 37.94 acres to be divided into one single family lot, two outlots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlots A contains 0.93 acres and is intended to be a private street with ownership being controlled by a homeowner's association. Outlot B contains 36.21 acres and will be further subdivided at a future date. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council November 15, 1988 per Resolution No. 88-258. A second reading of Ordinance No. 50-88-PUD-14-88, changing zoning from Rural to PUD-14-RI-22 and from Rural to PUD-14-RI-44, was finally read and approved at the City Council held Apri12, 1991. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed April 2, 1991. VARIANCES: Variance is necessary from City Code 12.20 Subd. 2.A. waiving the six-month maximum time elapse between the approval date of the preliminary plat and filing of the final plat. All other variances not granted through the Planned Unit Development District Review mustbe processed through the Board of APpeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: The street within this development is proposed to be private with controlled access. Sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer are proposed to be publicly owned and maintained and will be installed throughout this project in conformance with City Standards. It is anticipated that an upgrading of existing Riverview Road will take place in the near future; therefore, it is recommended that the Developer enter into a special assessment agreement for the construction costs of upgrading Riverview Road. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. As specified in the Developer's Agreement, the Developer is to provide a written scenic/conservation easement over the steep bluff areas of this property. Prior to release of the final plat, the Developer shall provide written scenic/conservation easement over Lot 1, Block 1. BONDING: Financial security to cover the installation of utilities proposed to be publicly owned and maintained must be provided prior to release of the final plat. RECOMMENDATION: ,,' Recommend approval of the final plat of Bell Oaks Estate subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: JJ:ssa cc: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,404. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250. Execution of special assessment agreement for upgrading Riverview Road. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. Receipt of scenic/conservation easement over Lot 1, Block 1. Bell Oaks Company Ed Ames, OSM, Inc. • • • • August 28, 1992 MEMO TO: Eden Prairie Mayor and City Council ,ROM: George Bentley ~~ THROUGH: Diane Harberts, Administrator 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612)934-7928 Fax (612) 937-7411 SUBJECT: Proposed new transit service and tax impacts On September 8, 1992 the Southwest Metro Transit Commission (SMTC) plans to begin new midday transit service between Eden Prairie Center and Southdale, and on September 21, 1992 plans to begin midday transit service between Eden Prairie Center and the Mall of America. These new transit services are intended to enhance commuting opportunities for residents within the SMTC area, to provide greatly improved incommute opportunities to job seekers from outside the area for Eden Prairie businesses, to provide regular connections to the metropolitan transit system through transit hubs at Southdale and the Mall of America, and to meet expressed demand for service to the Southdale area and the Mall of America. The new transit routes will also begin implementation of the Regional Transit Board's Vision for Transit program for this area, and will allow SMTC to begin service in conformance with the 1-494 Travel Demand Management plan. The SMTC approved this new service at its August 27th meeting, and once the plan has been approved by the Regional Transit Board (RTB) it can go into effect. Implementation of this new fixed route midday service will have a potential tax impact on Eden Prairie due to the laws governing the transit property tax. Due to this potential tax impact, the Eden Prairie City Council is being asked to endorse a resolution in support of this new transit service, with an understanding of the potential tax impacts which are automatic with the start of midday service. These tax impacts on Eden Prairie are potential because the timing of the new service would mean that transit tax increases would not start until 1994, and then only if the service proves to be successful and continues beyond August 31, 1993. Of note, Minnesota Valley Transit Authority recently obtained similar resolutions of support from the cities of Burnsville • Apple Valley and Eagan for its new Mall 01 America service and circulator service in those cities. ,.,...., I ./ v;,. "7 .... . City Council Memo 8/24/92 -Page 2 BACKGROUND SMTC was formed in 1986, pursuant to Minnesota statutes. as a .~joint powers agreement between the cities of Eden Prairie, Chanhassen and Chaska. The first SMTC vehicles began service on December 1, 1986, and since then the system has experienced dramatic growth. Express bus trips from the SMTC area to downtown Minneapolis have expanded from ten trips a day to twenty six trips a day, providing rides to over 1100 passengers daily. Dial-A- Ride service has grown from one van to seven vans traveling nearly 550,000 miles annually. SMTC also provides a limited incommute service during peak hours for area businesses. Overall, annual ridership on SMTC has grown from 140,000 in 1987 to 280,000 in 1991. Demand is so great for SMTC's morning and evening commute runs that several of the vehicles experience standing loads on a regular basis. Dial-A-Ride service has been extremely successful by providing a door-to- door shared ride van service within the SMTC area. • SMTC has constructed several park and ride lots within the • three cities, has erected several bus shelters, and is in the process of developing several additional park and ride lots to help meet demand. In 1995 a unique and exciting new transit hub is scheduled to open in Eden Prairie along Technology Drive, west of Prairie Center Drive, which will become the focal point for SMTC services. SMTC FUNDING Funding for SMTC is provided by property taxes collected within the three city area by the RTB through a metropolitan area-wide transit property tax. SMTC, due to the Replacement Service (or "opt-out") statute, is eligible to spend up to 90 percent of these property taxes, subject to approval by the RTB, for SMTC's transit program. The budget for SMTC for 1992 is $1,784,000, or about $200,000 less than the 90 percent of local available transit funds it is allowed to spend. It is fikely that actual expenditures for SMTC will fall well below the 1992 budget amount due to continuing efforts to build efficiencies into the system. The 1993 budget will be approximately the same as the 1992 budget, even with expanded service, because the RTB begins assuming the cost of capital in our service contracts beginning January 1, 1993. This capital amount is • approximately $350,000 annually. • • • City Council Memo 8/24/92 -Page 3 TAX IMPACTS OF NEW SERVICE All communities within the Transit Taxing District of the /RTB, including the three SMTC cities, are subject to a transit property tax, as mentioned previously. The tax rate charged throughout the Transit Taxing District is uniform, thereby known as the Uniform Tax Capacity Rate. For 1992 the Uniform Tax Capacity Rate is 2.965 percent. Under Minnesota statute 473.446, Sub. 1 (c)(3), the amount of the Uniform Tax Capacity Rate is to be reduced in a city if that city receives only peak hour regular route service, or receives midday regular route service at intervals greater than 60 minutes. The reduction in the Uniform Tax Capacity Rate for these reduced service levels is called "feathering", and there are two feathering levels below the Uniform Rate: Uniform Tax Capacity Rate Feathering Level #1 Feathering Level #2 REDUCTION 0% . 510?/O . 765~~ RATE 2.965% 2.455% 2.200% Feathering level #1 is for communities with full peak hour service and limited off peak service (service of greater than once per hour frequency). Feathering level #2 is for communities with full peak hour service and no off peak regular route service. The cities of Eden Prairie, Chanhassen and Chaska are charged at the feathering level #2 rate of 2.2 percent since this area has peak hour service and no midday regular route service. (Note: Dial-A-Ride service does not count as midday service because it does not follow a regular route and is ignored under the law.) . Implementation of new midday'~egular route service to Southdale and the Mall of America will automatically place Eden Prairie in a higher tax rate. The service proposed will only run to and from Eden Prairie, so the other two SMTC cities will not be impacted by the new tax rates at this time . City Council Memo 8/24/92 -Page 4 The frequency of this new service will determine whether Eden Prairie will be completely unfeathered (the highest tax rate) or partially unfeathered (feathering level #1). If the ifrequency of service is 60 minutes or less the tax capacity rate for Eden Prairie will be the Uniform Rate of 2.965%. If the frequency is greater than 60 minutes the rate will be at feathering level #1, or 2.455%. Perhaps an easier to understand measure of the relative impacts partial or total unfeathering would have on Eden Prairie is to examine the tax impacts on various home values. The table below illustrates the increases expected to property taxes due to (1) partial unfeathering or (2) total unfeathering: 1 ASSESSED VALUE $ 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 1 TAX INCREASE (1) @ 2.455% (2) @ 2.965% $1.99 3.26 4.54 5.81 $ 5.96 9.79 13.62 17.45 Prepared by Eden Prairie Assessing Department These figures are illustrative only, representing the tax impacts on Eden Prairie homes if Eden Prairie had been unfeathered in 1992. The actual impacts will change from year to year. TIMING OF TAX IMPACTS As mentioned previously, the new fixed route midday service is scheduled to begin on September 8 and September 21, 1992. This new service is being implemented as a demonstration project through August of 1993. The RTB determines its tax leyels for metropolitan area cities based upon the service in existence as of September 1, 1992. By coincidence (not by design) the new SMTC service will not begin until after that date, and it is expected that the tax impact of this new service will not occur to Eden Prairie until 1994, and then only if the demonstration project proves successful. • • • • • • City Council Memo 8/24/92 -Page 5 The timing of the new service is planned to coincide with the start of classes at Hennepin County Vo-Tech (September 8) and the University of Minnesota (September 21). Considerable ,"'commute and reverse commute riders are expected to utilize this new service for these educational institutions. In addition, within the next few years the RTB plans to implement additional routes relative to its Vision for Transit plan from Eden Prairie to Minnetonka and Burnsville. The implementation of these new routes would certainly result in unfeathering for Eden Prairie. It should be kept in mind that by unfeathering Eden Prairie, SMTC gains considerable new potential revenues in the future. These new revenues can be used for enhanced transit services by SMTC, and in that way the dollars are returning to the community. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Eden Prairie City Council approve the attached resolution of support for the new SMTC midday regular route transit service to and from Eden Prairie, Southdale and the Mall of America. Since the unfeathering of taxes is automatic under the law, SMTC would appreciate this resolution of support for its decision. This resolution acknowledges that the new transit service will be midday regular route service with a frequency of one hour or less, resulting in full unfeathering for Eden Prairie . ,1)-' /' !/) ,., '-.. vl.J Intermediate District 287 ___________ He_n_ne_pi_n_Te_c_hn_ic_al_c_oll_e9_e ________________________ ----------------------------~~ Dr. Ronald M. Carter Superintendent DISTRICT OFFICE 11120 North Xcniulll Lane Plymouth Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3535 ;. August 26, 1992 The Honorable Doug Tenpas, Mayor Members of the City Council City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, MN Dear Mayor Tenpas and Councilmembers: On behalf of the School Board and Intermediate District 287, Hennepin Technical College, we support Resolution #92-194, Southwest Metro Transit Commission Proposal to add bus service in the City of Eden Prairie. During the past several months our district representative has been meeting with SMTC Administrator Diane Harberts to explore the opportunities that would increase the availability of public transit for students attending our Eden Prairie Campus of Hennepin Technical College. We have successfully worked with SMTC to have Hennepin Technical College be a bus stop/transfer point in the twelve-month project proposal that would add service from Eden Prairie to Southdale Mall to commence September 8, 1992. We assure you that we are committed to working with SMTC to ensure the success of such a project, and pledge support in publicizing the availability of this service. We had a similar experience at our Brooklyn Park Campus where bus transportation was made available; as a direct result of that bus transportation our enrollment of transported students to that campus is significantly higher than the enrollment at the Eden Prairie Campus. We know from our survey data that our Eden Prairie Campus enrollment would increase significantly from the perspective of students who currently cannot attend because of the lack of available transportation. We commend the City of Eden Prairie for taking this progressive approach in addressing the transportation needs of the area and community,. and encourage the approval of Resolution #92-194. Sincerely, b/d/ ~ a?'ctt Ronald M. Carter Superintendent /pl ;:0#>, AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ACCREDITED BY THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-194 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION PROPOSAL TO ADD MID-DAY BUS SERVICE IN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS, the Southwest Metro Transit Commission (SMTC) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes SS473.84, 473.388 and 471.59 has been established under a joint powers agreement by and among the cities of Chanhassen, Chaska and Eden Prairie, and exists as an operating public transit authority, and WH ER EAS, two 12-month demonstration project proposals to add midday bus service from Eden Prairie to the Southdale Mall and to the Mall of America have been approved by the SMTC and WHEREAS, the 12-month demonstration project proposal to add midday bus service from Eden Prairie to the Southdale Mall will begin September 8, 1992 and terminate August 31, 1993 unless the project has been evaluated successful and approved by SMTC to continue after August 31, 1993 and WHEREAS, the 12-month demonstration project proposal to add midday bus service from Eden Prairie to the Mall of America will be cosponsored and funded by SMTC and the Regional Transit Board (RTB) and service is proposed to begin September 21, 1992 and terminate August 31, 1993 unless the project has been evaluated successful and approved by SMTC and the RTB to continue after August 31, 1993 and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes define full peak and off-peak bus service as "peak period regular route service plus weekday midday regular route service at intervals of 60 minutes or less in length on the route with the greatest frequency", and WHEREAS, due to the lack of any midday service operated by SMTC, the operating levies are fully feathered, and WHEREAS, with the implementation of midday bus service operating with service frequency of sixty minutes or less to Southdale Mall and/or to the Mall of America the transit tax will change from fully feathered to fully unfeathered should the demonstration projects be approved to continued after August 31, 1993;.- NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City does hereby support the following statement: 1 . The City of Eden Prairie supports efforts to increase demand for multiple occupancy vehicle trips in a cost effective way by strengthening commuting alternatives. 2. The implementation of service to the Southdale Mall and to the Mall of America strengthens local commuting alternatives and reinforces the regional transit system by providing connections to other metro area destinations. /<18'/ i .) \J 3. The SMTC transit system will be enhanced by providing an expanded schedule to midday commuters, persons with flexible work hours, and increased midday travel opportunities to destinations within and outside SMTC service area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie has identified transit service as an alternative to reducing reliance on the automobile, decreasing congestion, and increasing travel opportunities for its residents and therefore, for the aforementioned reasons, supports the unfeathering of the transit tax in the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 1st day of September, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • • TO: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~ DATE: . August 5, 1992 SUBJECT: Joint Meeting with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission At the August 3rd meeting, the members of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission requested the City Council consider scheduling a joint meeting with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission prior to the Council's regular meeting on October 6th. The Commission suggested a 6 p.m. meeting and indicated they would like to discuss the following topics: A. Role of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission m the Development Review Process B . Preservation of Natural Features -Minnesota River Bluffs, Creek Valleys, etc. C. Development of Eden Prairie's Downtown The Commission has requested Council members to review their schedules to determine if October 6th is feasible, and if not to propose a meeting date that would be amenable to all Councilmembers. BL:mdd meeting/7 • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-184 WlIEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objectives in the proposed assessments for the following improvements to wit: (See Exhibit A attached) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie: 1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit A. Installments shall bear interest at the rates shown on Exhibit A, commencing October 1, 1992. No interest shall be charged for calendar year 1992 if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 30, 1992. 3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes beginning in 1992. ADOPTED BY the Eden Prairie City Council on September 1, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk PROJECT 1. Supplementals Demolition of House at 10943 Spoon Ridge EXHIBIT A 1992 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TOTAL COST CITY FUNDS $10,581.00 $-0- AMOUNT TO BE ASSESSED $10,581.00 • • • • • CASCADE TOWNHOMES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-189 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF CASCADE TOWNHOMES FOR SUNSET HOMES CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Cascade Townhomes PUD Concept by Sunset Homes Corporation and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 1, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1992. 1. Cascade Townhomes by Sunset Homes Corporation, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outl!ned in the plans (as revised) dated August 28, 1992. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 10, 1992. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 1st day of September, Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City Clerk CASCADE TOWNHOMES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-190 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CASCADE TOWNHOMES FOR SUNSET HOMES CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Cascade Townhomes for Sunset Homes Corporation dated August 28, 1992, consisting of 6.35 acres into 18 lots and 3 outlots, a copy of which is on flle at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 1st day of September, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • STAFF REPORT TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Chris Enger, Director of Planning Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner August 7, 1992 Cascade Townhomes Sunset Homes Corporation Dell Road and Cascade Drive 1. PUD Concept Review on 60 acres. 2. PUD District Review on 6.35 acres with waivers. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the existing RM-6.5 Zoning District on 6.35 acres . 4. Site Plan Review on 6.35 acres within the existing RM-6.5 Zoning District. 5. SlaJ(JLMER AVE. I I CHANHASSEN tl site -.--,---~-~-.... ". • , ., ',' ..... :-.1 j;,l:ItI:llQdI!~~ Ie.· . I L . : ~::~ ~~, .... ~ W. 82ND ST c: e' Staff Report Cascade Townhomes August 7, 1992 BACKGROUND This" site is currently guided Medium Density Residential. This site is part of the 1990 Jamestown PUD approved for 20 multiple units. This site is zoned RM-6.5. This site has site plan approval for 20 multiple family units. The attached approved site plan shows two 8-unit buildings and one 4-unit building. SITE PLAN The site plan shows 18 townhomes on 6.35 acres at a density of 2.83 units per acre. The RM- 6.5 zoning district would allow up to 6.7 units per acre. In order to preserve the wetland and trees, the lower density is necessary. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS In order to save trees, the proponent is requesting building setback and parking setback waivers from the City Code. Building 1, 2, and 3 are setback 25 feet from the street right-of-way which is a 5 foot waiver. Guest parking spaces are proposed at a minimum of 5 feet from the street right-of-way which is a 25 foot parking setback waiver. Although the request for waivers have merit in order to save trees, the placement of the buildings and parking areas closer to the roadway leaves less room for screening and buffering. This will be addressed in more detail in the Landscaping and Screening section. GRADING AND TREE LOSS There are 1078 inches of significant trees on this site. The grading plan will remove 28 percent of the significant trees or 301 inches. This compares favorably with the average tree loss in the community at 26 percent. The approved site plan for the project had a lower tree loss (15 %) because the buildings were larger and located farther away from the significant trees. Tree replacement based on a 28 percent tree loss will be 116 inches. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING The landscaping requirements for this project is based upon the caliper inch requirement based on building square footage, tree replacement, and screening of parking areas. The caliper inch requirement is 146 inches and the tree replacement requirement is 116 inches. The landscape • • plan shows a total of 240 caliper inches. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide an • additional 31 caliper inches. • • • Staff Report Cascade Townhomes August 7, 1992 Since building and parking areas are built closer to the street right-of-way and will require a waiver, special attention must be given to the use of heavy plant material screening. Attachment B indicates the areas which should be used for mass shrub plantings. ARCHITECTURE There are 2-unit, 4-unit and 6-unit buildings. The buildings are proposed to be constructed out of face brick, wood siding and asphalt shingles. The roof pitches are steep and similar to the Jamestown Townhomes. Since most of the buildings are garage fronts facing the street, two additional front elevations are needed to provide variety. Different color schemes are also needed for the buildings. DRAINAGE There is an existing storm sewer system in Cascade Drive. The drainage plan as proposed drains all of the water across graded swales to the wetland area. The Engineering Department has indicated that the grading plan should be revised to pick up the majority of the storm water runoff in a storm sewer and catch basin system and direct towards Cascade Drive. In addition, draining water across filled swales is an erosion problem. UTILITIES All utilities from the property line to the units are private. There should be a homeowners association responsible for the maintenance of the sewer and water lines. All fire hydrants should be located within City right-of-way. SIDEWALKS AND TRAllS The proponent will be required to construct a five foot wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of Cascade Drive. WETLAND DELINEATION The proponent is required to provide a wetland delineation for the wetland area south of this project. Based upon available information the edge of the wetland is defined at the 896 contour. No filling is proposed within this area. The proponent should work with the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District on the wetland delineation. This must be completed prior to final plat approval . starr Report Cascade Townhomes August 7, 1992 CONCLUSION This property is zoned RM-6.5 and with site plan approval to build 20 townhome units. The Planning Commission is being asked to consider an alternative site plan proposal for 18 townhome units. The new plan spreads the buildings farther apart of the property which leaves less of the wooded character and increases tree loss. However, smaller buildings may be more appropriate considering the proximity to single family homes to the east and south across the wetland area. PUD waivers are requested to help save trees which is a good reason for considering the waivers. Since some of the buildings and parking are closer to the roadway, greater attention must be given to how these areas will be screened. Since the amount of parking areas are small, landscaping should provide screening. Architectural variety is a requirement. The proponent should provide revised building elevations which depict different architectural styles and colors but with a common theme. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff presents the following alternatives: Alternative I: If the Planning Commission believes that the site plan is an acceptable alternative use of the property then one option would be to recommend approval of a PUD Concept, PUD District Review with waivers, Zoning District Amendment, Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat based on the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 7, 1992 and based on plans dated August 7, 1992 and subject to the following additional conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. A revised landscaping plan which provides for better screening of parking areas and 31 additional caliper inches. -' ~ B. Architecturally different building elevations (construction details) and different color schemes. • • • • • • Staff Report Cascade Townhomes August 7, 1992 Alternative IT: C. A revised the storm water drainage plan to direct the majority of storm water runoff towards the existing catch basin system in Cascade Drive. 2. Prior to final plat, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Detailed storm water runoff, erosion control and utility plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Detailed storm water runoff, erosion control and wetland delineation plan for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Cash park fee. B . Plans for the Fire Marshall. If the Planning Commission is not comfortable with the alternative site plan as proposed, that the tree loss is too high and that the waivers are not justified then one option would be to recommend denial of the project as proposed. Staff recommends Alternative one. -,-'" • • • 1IJ!tII'»~~ .... , .~ ----------------~r----------------_<C_ . TRUNK HIGHWAY 5 --- I i / . ~ , , ;' .I • • • :/ ,'i " " " " " " " " " " " " " :, " " .I " • I! " ': " ; ~ " ·i •. ~. _ ... 1 I i L. , ,~ ~!II~ Landscape Revision Attachment B " " ,I,' IV. Unapproved Minutes August 10, 1992 Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARINGS • A. CASCADE TOWNHOMES by Sunset Homes Corporation. Request for PUD Concept Review on 60 acres, PUD District Review on 6.35 acres with waivers, Zoning District Amendment within the existing RM-6.5 Zoning District on 6.35 acres, Preliminary Plat of 6.35 acres into 18 lots and 3 outlots and Site Plan Review on 6.35 acres. Location: Dell Road and Cascade Drive. Franzen reported that this property had zoning approval approximately 2 years ago for 3 buildings. The proposal consisted of 2-unit, 4-unit, and 6-unit buildings. The proponent had decreased the number of 2-unit buildings because of the additional space needed between buildings and parking. Jim Ostenson, representing Tandem Corporation, stated that the drainage concerns would be addressed before the City Council meeting. Ostenson said that saving more trees was a major concern when looking at this site. He believed that the Rottlund-Centex would not be appropriate on this site and, therefore, went with the Sunset Home style which was more of a traditional townhouse unit. Ostenson noted that a new tree survey had been done last month and the homes had been placed to allow the significant tree to be located toward the back of the lots. The proponent proposed to have 1 6-unit building to save more trees. Ostenson stated that the project would be heavily landscaped. He presented a copy of the sales brochure from the original approved PUD plan to show the difference in the proposals. • Donney, representing the proponent, stated that the outside architecture would blend with the existing neighborhood. A 6/12 pitch roof was proposed to help blend in with the single-family units. The price range proposed was $120,000 to $130,000. Sandstad asked if there were different elevations for the buildings to create some variety. Donney replied that there would be different roof styles and some units would have front- loaded garages. Wissner asked what type of siding would be used. Donney replied a masonite material with a 25-year guarantee and white wash brick. Kardell asked what the square-footage of the units would be. Donney replied approximatel y 17,000 square feet. Clinton asked what market the proponent was trying to reach. Donney replied the empty nesters and professional couples. Norman asked how many bedrooms the units would have. Donney replied 3 bedrooms with finished lower levels. • • • • Hawkins asked if there was a sidewalk. Ostenson replied there would be a sidewalk to the south of Cascade Drive. Hawkins then asked what park was the closest. Franzen replied Miller Park or Mitchell Park. Franzen added that roads would connect the Jamestown Development and sidewalks would be provided to Miller Park . Franzen reported that a previously approved plan would allow 20 units on this property. The plan proposed was a different type of housing with walkout units, which would allow the proponent to save more trees. He added that no fill would go into the wetland area with the proposed plan. Franzen stated that there would be a mass of wooded area which would wrap around the entrance and the trees proposed for landscaping were of the pin oak variety which was in character with the trees which were taken out. Franzen said that Staff was concerned about the curb appeal of the project since most townhouse units typically had garage fronts. He added that on this project all the garages would be front- loaded; the variation would be in the outside architecture to create subtle changes by varying the accent trim materials while keeping the basic color and roof materials all the same. Franzen believed that the storm water run-off could be handled from within the development. The proponent would need to furnish 31 inches of additional trees, which would not be a problem because there was plenty of room on the site. Franzen noted that the proponent could have designed the plan without the need for waivers; however, Staff believed that the plan as proposed was a better plan. Staff recommended the use of shrubs for landscaping. Staff recommended approval of the project based on the recommendations outlined in the Staff Report. Hawkins asked for clarification on the recommendation that a homeowners association be formed and be responsible for the maintenance of the sewer and water lines and also if an association was planned by the proponent. Donney replied that a homeowners association was planned. Franzen replied that it had been the experience of the City that there was a question about who was responsible for repairs. Hawkins noted that the requirement for a 5-foot sidewalk was not part of the official recommendations. Franzen replied that it should be added as recommendation #4. Ostenson noted that the requirement for the sidewalk was part of the overall PUD approval. Hawkins asked Ostenson if the proponent would have a problem articulating the requirement related to this proposal. Ostenson replied no; however, it would be better to wait to install the sidewalk after the development was constructed so that it was not broken up by construction vehicles. Clinton asked if there would be a berm in front of the visitor parking area. Franzen replied that in the lO-foot area not much could be done to berm the area; however, in the 20-foot area a 2-foot berm could be used. Franzen recommended the use of shrubs to screen the parking area; he believed that this was the only solution for this project. Franzen noted that other options such as fencing and other forms of landscaping had been discussed. .. Wissner asked if there were special parking requirements for multiple dwellings. Franzen replied that each unit required 1 parking space in the garage and 1 space outside; the proposed units would have double garages. Additional visitor parking was required at 112 space per unit or for this development 9 spaces. Wissner commented that in many townhouse developments guest parking was a problem. Hawkins asked if there would be special signage for the development and how would trash disposal areas be handled. Franzen replied that a monument sign was not part of the original PUD and had not been requested at this time by the proponent; however, there could be a monument sign at the entrance to the development. Kardell replied thaa each unit would handle its own trash disposal as in a single-family unit; there would b.., no central disposal. Bauer stated that he was comfortable with the proposal as presented. Bauer was concerned that the architectural variety be limited to 3 different looks to give the project a community look. Hawkins stated that he too was comfortable with the proposal with the additional sidewalk recommendation. Kardell stated that she liked the use of the smaller buildings and encouraged the development of affordable housing. Hawkins stated that he would like to see a similar plan as used on the Fairfield project with specific demarcation of areas for storing of materials and equipment. Franzen replied that the proponent could be required to stake the site with snow fence where the materials were to be stored. Hawkins added that he would like to see the Tandem Corporation continue with there progressive efforts to save the trees. MOTION 1: Hawkins moved, seconded by Bauer to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0-0. MOTION 2: Hawkins moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sunset Homes Corporation for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 60 acres, based on plans dated August 7, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 7, 1992 with the following additions: 4. Concurrent with site construction a 5' sidewalk be constructed on the south side of Cascade Drive. 5. Areas for storing construction material and parking construction vehicles shall be staked with snow fencing and shown on the grading plan. Motion carried 7-0-0. MOTION 3: Hawkins moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sunset Homes Corporation for Planned Unit Development District Review within the RM-6.5 District with waivers, on 6.35 acres, based on plans dated August 7, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 7, 1992 with the following additions: 4. Concurrent with site construction a 5' sidewalk be constructed on the south side of Cascade Drive. 5. Areas for storing construction material and parking construction vehicles shall be staked with snow fencing and shown on the grading plan. Motion carried 7-0-0. • • • • MOTION 4; Hawkins moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Cascade Townhomes for Zoning District Amendment within the RM-6.5 Zoning District on 6.35 acres, based on plans dated August 7, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 7, 1992 with the following additions: 4. Concurrent with site construction a 5' sidewalk be constructed on the south side of Cascade Drive. 5. Areas for storing construction material and parking construction vehicles shall be staked with snow fencing and shown on the grading plan. Motion carried 7-0-0. MOTION 5; Hawkins moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Cascade Townhomes for Preliminary Plat of 6.35 acres into 18 lots and 3 outlots, based on plans dated August 7, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 7, 1992 with the following additions: 4. Concurrent with site construction a 5' sidewalk be constructed on the south side of Cascade Drive. 5. Areas for storing construction material and parking construction vehicles shall be staked with snow fencing and shown on the grading plan. Motion carried 7-0-0. MOTION 6: Hawkins moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Cascade Townhomes for Site Plan Review on 6.35 acres, based on plans dated August 7, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 7, 1992 with the following additions: 4. Concurrent with site construction a 5' sidewalk be constructed on the south side of Cascade Drive. 5. Areas for storing construction material and parking construction vehicles shall be staked with snow fencing and shown on the grading plan. Motion carried 7-0-0 . • • VAC 92-06 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-183 VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER ON PART OF OUTLOT E, THE PRESERVE COMMERCIAL PARK SOUTH WIJEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a certain easement described as follows: A perpetual easement, 20.00 feet wide, as measured at right angles, for sanitary sewer line installation and maintenance purposes, over under and across part of Outlot E, The Preserve Commercial Park South, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The center line of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlot E; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 46 minutes 40 seconds East along the east line of said Outlot E a distance of 140.0 feet to the point of beginning of said center line to be described; thence South 58 degrees 20 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 248.98 feet to a point of 10.00 feet north of the south line of said Outlot E, as measured at right angles; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 42 seconds West, parallel with said south line a distance of 140.00 feet; thence North 53 degrees 20 minutes 19 seconds West a distance of 253.00 feet and there terminating. The sidelines of said easement shall be lengthened or shortened to terminate 5 feet westerly of and parallel to said east line of Outlot E. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 1, 1992 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said easement is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said easement as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851 ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 1, 1992 .t. s-Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, City Clerk ------------------~--~----~-- ---N -(' H __ OJZ L-- :;:: ...... ...... .. , ..... LUNDS CENTER ADD EnEN LAK ELEM. '''''''''A'-·-=--:-: .,:~:-I •• • ••• '-• ~ W L 0 I Z W '1 .~ J z --.. : ,- -'" ~ ..... IP2.00 lOS 21'Sv9 ~ ---, ----I ,------- "1---" I.I.l 1 . I I I -, I W I / . ~ a III \lJ' \ \ E~ ~ Y f-V m -J 0 U \J) I!O I .' -' ~ «'III I 09. . . _. ~ lli t:D / 8~ i~_' ____ ~!-, ! ____ I~-!9' j-. r::o /~ ~ J ~ ~ i,. " . ;1:1''' /~ ---~~--~. I ~~ 1 ~I a +--. --L SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27284 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 8-7-92 • 285 286 287 27288 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 8-7-92 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 8-7-92 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE CO AUGUST 92 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 8-7-92 27289 27290 27291 27292 27293 27294 27295 27296 27297 27298 27299 27300 27301 27302 27303 27304 27305 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 8-7-92 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 8-7-92 INT~RNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 8-7-92 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 8-7-92 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 8-7-92 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 8-7-92 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE AUGUST 92 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 7-24-92 & 8-7-92 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 8-7-92 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 8-7-92 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 8-7-92 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE STATE OF MINNESOTA BIKE REGISTRATIONS U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-ABSENTEE BALLOTS-ELECTIONS DEPT DELARIAS KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL MERLINS HARDWARE HANK -PAINTIBRUSHES/MEASURES/SAW BLADES/ROPE/ -KEYSIBOLT/FlLES/FILE HANDLES/SANDPAPER/ 411j306 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER 27307 GARRISONS MUSIC CENTER 27308 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT 27309 TRUSTEE MUSIC PERFORMANCE 27310 MINNESOTA GFOA 27311 RADISSON ARROWWOOD 27312 MAUMA 27313 ADVENTURE VAN & TRUCK 27314 MINNESOTA C L E 27315 USPCA NATIONAL TRIALS 27316 PETTY CASH-COMMUNITY CENTER 27317 KAREN ANDERSON 27318 VOID OUl' CHECK 27319 ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH 27320 DOROTHY BOVEE 27321 DAVID DUBE 27322 REBECCA EBERBACH 27323 BETSY ERICKSON 27324 JULIE FALKENSTEIN 27325 JULIE FOSTER • 26 CINDY GLESSNER . 27 HENNEPIN CTY COMMUNITY SVCS 16704014 -VANEIBELTSIWRENCHESIBROOM/DUCT TAPE/DRILL -BITSIHAND CLEANER/SHOWER CURTAIN/RUST -REMOVER-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER/POOL LESSONS -LOCK/JACK BLOCK/EXTENSION CORDSIPUMPS/ -CAULKING/ANCHORS/CHAIN/CRIMPER/CAPS/ -HANGERSITIMER LEVERS/LIGHTS/KICKSTAND/ -TAPE MEASURERIWIRE/PAINT/FUNNEL PROPANE/ RELECTORSIMAILBOX NUMBERS/SEALERIBRUSHES/ PIANO RENTAL-STARING LK CONCERT SF.~IES EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT -ENTERTAINMENT-S:ARING LK CONCERT SERIES- HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION CONFERENCE-FINANCE DEPT CONFERENCE LODGING-FINANCE DEPT CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT -CENTER CONSOLE/INTERIOR LIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT K-9 TRIALS-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER REFUND-BOUNDARY WATER TRIP REFUND-STARING LK PARK BUILDING RENTAL REFUND-ARTFUL GARDEN TRIP-ADULT PROGRAMS REFUND-YOUTH TENNIS TOURNAMENT REFUND-YOUTH SAILING LESSONS REFUND-YOUTH SAILING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP /lSS 250.00 76620.20 6244.00 2734.22 225.69 280.00 2773.76 515.13 32.00 50.00 25.00 2629.13 1200.00 34950.00 82.50 164.50 32315.17 270.00 26.00 56.87 11.18 404.78 1402.10 400.00 11.10 1738.00 150.00 92.66 11.00 232.05 555.00 125.00 22.02 98.00 0.00 79.88 23.00 2.00 3.20 5.00 13.00 58.00 19.00 140.00 SEPTEMBER 1. 1992 27328 AGNES HODGOON REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP 55.00 27329 SHIRLEY HUNKER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS fJ 27330 NICK LEDIN REFUND-YOUTH TENNIS TOURNAMENT 27331 MEGAN PETKOFF REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 27332 JULIE REED REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 27333 RHONDA ROUTH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 27334 ANDY SCHUMACHER REFUND-YOUTH TENNIS TOURNAMENT 5.00 27335 LOUI SE SCHURLE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 27336 BLAKE SOREMS REFUND-YOUTH TENNIS TOURNAMENT 5.00 27337 JAN SOTEBEER REFUND-ACTIVITY CAMP 48.00 27338 SUSAN STEVENS REFUND-YOUTH TENNIS TOURNAMENT 5.00 27339 SUE THOMPSON REFUND-SKATING LESSONS-ICE ARENA REPAIRS 22.00 27340 OOROTHY & GEORGE WALETZKO REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 10.00 27341 VALERIE WALSH REFUND-ACTIVITY CAMP 55.00 27342 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 160.00 27343 MCOONALDS RESTAURANT EXPENSES-ACTIVITY CAMP PROGRAM 78.75 27344 MCOONALDS RESTAURANT EXPENSES-YOUTH ATHLETICS PROGRAM 5.00 27345 BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATERSLIDE PARK -TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 162.50 FEES PAID 27346 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-FALL COMMUNITY PROGRAM BROCHURE 4495.41 27347 EAGLE WINE CO 15495693121 1276.27 27348 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC 15494093121 14323.44 27349 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO 15494093121 22375.76 27350 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 13570.52 27351 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 154.75 27352 PRIOR WINE CO . 15494093121 2096.46 27353 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR 15107.79 27354 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO -UNIFORMS-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/FACILITIES 38.2 " -DEPT/STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT I -MAINT/COMMUNITY CTR/UTILITIES DIVITOWELS & MATS-LIQUOR STORES 27355 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE 124.90 CONCESSION 27356 PAPER WAREHOUSE -PAPER CUPSITABLE COVERS/NAPKINS/FORKS/ 60.86 -BAGS/SCISSORSITRAY-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER 27357 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GROUNDSMASTER MOWER-PARK MAINTENANCE 11494.55 27358 ME NARDS -PRY BAR/SCREWDRIVERS/RETRACTABLE KNIFE/ 382.57 -WRENCHES/PLIERSITARPITIMBERS/SCREWS/ -TREATED TIMBERS/GRAVEL MIX-ENGINEERING DEPT/FIRE DEPT/STREET & PARK MAINT 27359 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER -SODIMULCH-STREET MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT/ 106.67 PURGATORY TRAIL 27360 LINDA BLOMSNESS REFUND-ACTIVITY CAMP PROGRAM 55.60 27361 APPLE RIVER CAMPGROUND TICKETS-BLOCK PARTY PROGRAM/FEES PAID 45.00 27362 DAIRY QUEEr{ EXPENSES-BLOCK PARTY PROGRAM 50.00 27363 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY TAXES-BERMEL/SMABY LAND OONATION 8307.36 27364 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC AUGUST 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 4830.46 27365 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 458.20 27366 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 887.68 27367 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE 104.76 27368 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 55.25 27369 PETIY CASH -CHANGE FUND-SUMMER SKILL DEVELOPMENT/ 1° YOUTH ATHLETICS PROGRAM 27370 U S WEST CO~frruNICATIONS SERVICE 47 .27 10964490 IZ§N SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27371 HOLIDAY INN EAST CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 25.00 .372 HOPKINS POSTMASTER -POSTAGE-SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER 92 SENIOR 137.91 NEWSLETTER 373 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 25689.06 27374 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 12.41 27375 VOLUNTEER FIREMENS BENEFIT ASSN REGISTRATION FORMS-FIRE DEPT 320.00 27376 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 65.23 27377 AT&T SERVICE 29.17 27378 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ASSESSING WATER ACCESS CHARGES 675.50 27379 JEANNE BOLTON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 18.50 27380 ALEX OOW REFUND-ACTIVITY CAMP PROGRAM 70.00 27381 DEBBIE HARRINGTON REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY CLASS 26.00 27382 LINDA HEDIN REFUND-BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE TRIP 95.00 27383 OON LINN REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 8.00 27384 NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS 50.00 27385 SUSAN ORTON REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 8.00 27386 OONALD RAMLER REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 8.00 27387 ANDREW VUONG REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 16.25 27388 RICHARD KNUTSON INC -SERVICE-STARING LN & SUNRISE CIRCLE 80682.62 -IMPROVEMENTSIBLUFFS W 9THIBLUFFS E 81rn/ -BLUESTEM RIDGE/HAWK HIGH RIDGE/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION 27389 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL 330.00 27390 CAD/CAM TECHNOLOGIES INC SCHOOL-WATER DEPT 2090.00 27391 MAINLINE TRAVEL CONFERENCE AIRFARE-CITY COUNCIL 416.00 27392 MR PETER BLOEDELL -ENTERTAINMENT-CITY EMPLOYEE PICNIC-HUMAN 175.00 RESOURCES DEPT 4393 MCOONALDS EXPENSES-ACTIVITY CAMP PROGRAM 55.39 394 SONJA ANDERSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55.50 395 KEN ANDRS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 20.10 27396 JEFF BARTEL SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 20.63 27397 OONALD J CANAVAN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 22.53 27398 SHANNON CASSADY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 16.50 27399 CHRIS DELEON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 36.13 27400 STEVE DIBONA SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 19.13 27401 BRIANA ELFSTROM SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 46.60 27402 DIANA FARMER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 25.88 27403 NICK FRANDLE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 22.00 27404 AMANDA FURMAN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 5.78 27405 KYLER GIU10RE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 6.08 27406 BRIAN GRUIDL SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 90.72 27407 LIZA HAUSER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 7.20 27408 LISA HENRY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 69.73 27409 MIKE JUBERT SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 7.50 27410 ANDY KELLEY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 91.95 27411 CHRIS KOBEl{ SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 18.71 27412 JARED KOLANDER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 10.73 27413 CHRIS KUIPERS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM -5.25 27414 PAIGE LEAPALDT SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 19.80 27415 JOE A LUECK SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 12.10 27416 DAVID MADSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 62.73 27417 JACK MCCANN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 11.50 27418 JACK MCCANN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 4.13 .19 CHARLES MOUDLER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 30.25 20 JACOB PETTI PIECE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 4.68 11174688 .I?-;\-;.;' b t -~,/ ..i SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27421 MARIE ROGERS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 45.88 27422 MATTHEW SCHERER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM .g 27423 MATT SNYDER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 27424 JENNY THOMAS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 6.05 27425 RYAN VOLKER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 15.95 27426 AMY WAGNER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 46.45 27427 RYAN WAINWRIGHT SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 21.38 27428 CHAD WALLEBECK SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 61.31 27429 ANOY WILSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 4.88 27430 NICOLE WYMAN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 31.90 27431 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS -FIRE ALARM SYSTEM UPGRADE-POLICE BLDG/ 1527.60 TECHNOLOGY BLDG 27432 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC DRUM & INK CARTRIDGES-POLICE DEPT 163.79 27433 AIRSIGNAL INC -PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT/ 530.62 COMMUNITY CENTER 27434 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO -SERVICE-SWEEPING SEAL COAT AREA-STREET 6850.00 MAINTENANCE 27435 AMERICAN HEART ASSN DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 25.00 27436 AMERICAN RED CROSS TEXTBOOKS-POOL LESSONS 111.83 27437 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN DUES-WATER DEPT 67.00 27438 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY BUSINESS CARDS-LIQUOR STORE 102.24 27439 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC -BATTERIESIWARNING FLASHERS/SIGNS-STREET 1736.43 DEPT 27440 ANDERSONS GARDEN EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 89.68 27441 ANDROC PRODUCTS INC TREE'& WEED KILLING COMPOUND-STREET MAINT 115.82 27442 APOLLO ELEVATOR COMPANY ELEVATOR DOOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 70.00 27443 AQUA ENGINEERING INC -SPRAY HEAD/NOZZLE/CAP SLIP/CONNECTORS-119 STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 27444 PAM ARGUS -BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE GUIDE-OUTDOOR CTR 3 0 PROGRAM/FEES PAID 27445 ARMOR SECURITY INC -LOCK CYLINDER REPLACEDIREPLACED KEY PAD-154.40 POLICE BLDG/OUTDOOR CENTER 27446 ASIAN GANG INVESTIGATORS ASSN DUES-POLICE DEPT 10.00 27447 ASPEN CARPET CLEANING CARPET CLEANING-WATER DEPT 197.03 27448 B & STOOLS -WIRE PULLERS/KNIVES/NUT DRIVERS/SCRAPER/ 498.84 -HANDLESIWRENCHES/SCREWDRIVERS/CHISELS- EQUIPMENT MAINTIUTILITIES DIVISION 27449 BACONS ELECTRIC CO -REPAIRED FILTER PANELIREPLACED WELL HOUSE 475.91 OUTSIDE LIGHT-WATER DEPT 27450 MICHAEL BARONE EXPENSESIMILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 31.40 27451 GERALD J BARTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 45.00 27452 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC DASHER BOARD CLEANER-COMMUNITY CENTER 29.82 27453 BELL ATLANTIC TRlCON LEASING CORP -SEPTEMBER 92 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-358.68 POLICE DEPT 27454 MATTHEW BENDER & CO INC PUBLICATIONS-FINANCE DEPT 205.76 27455 BENSHOOF &fiSSOCIATES INC SERVICE-LEONA ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1184.94 27456 BETH BEUTELL -ADVERTISING-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 64.00 COMMISSION 27457 LOIS BOETTCHER MINUTES-HISTORICAL & CULTUAL COMMISSION 0.00 27458 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO MOTOR REPAIR-FIRE STATION 166.78 27459 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO CANDY-POOL LESSONS 75.50 27460 LEE M BRANDT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 308.75 27461 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC -VACUUM MOTOR/FILTER/VACUUM REPAIR-116 FACILITIES DEPT 27462 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC WORKBENCH-FACILITIES DEPT 23 .84 1616566 rl~'~C .! ~)IJ . SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27463 BROADWAY AWARDS PLAQUESITROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 372.53 .464 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 1555.83 465 DARIN BUCK MILEAGE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 101.25 _ 466 NATHAN D BUCK SOFTBALLIVOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 545.00 27467 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE PUBLICATION-SAFETY DEPT 71.64 27468 TOM BUCHNER -SERVICE-QUALITY STEERING COMMITTEE & 6000~00 QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TEAMS CONSULTATION 27469 BUS,INESS RECORDS CORP-FORMS -HANDICAPPED ADAPTER KITITAPE ROLL/ 515.26 , ELECTIONS DEPT 27470 DAVID M CAIN BIKING GLASSES-POLICE DEPT 88.00 27471 CALC TYPE OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT 315.00 27472 EILEEN CAMKES -SERVICE-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-368.50 PROMOTIONS COORDINATOR 27473 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIO REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 625.00 27474 CAPITOL SALES CO INC VCR TAPES-FIRE DEPT 52.58 27475 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC -JULY 92 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE-HUMAN 170.00 RESOURCES DEPT 27476 R E CARLSON INC HEATER MOTOR-WATER DEPT 107.41 27477 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO INC SECURITY MIRROR-LIQUOR STORE 73.02 27478 CARLSONS TREE SERVICE TREE DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1597.50 27479 CARTRIDGECARE INC PRINTER CARTRIDGES-CITY HALL 83.07 27480 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC LASERJET PRINTER/SOFTWARE-POLICE DEPT 1669.00 27481 CENTRAIRE INC -COMPRESSOR REPAIR/FREEZE STAT REPLACED/ 820.56 -FAN CYCLING CONTROL-POLICE BLDGIREPLACED -CONNECTORS/FUSES-SENIOR CENTER/FILTERS/ BLOWER BELT-LIQUOR STORE 27482 JAMES G CLARK AUGUST 92 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 200.00 4483 CLASSIC POOLS PLUS INC DE-CHLORINE-POOL OPERATIONS 22.33 484 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO ASPHALT-STREET MAINTENANCE 444.42 485 CONPUTERWARE DATA PRODUCTS INC COMPUTER PAPER & LABELS-COMMUNITY CENTER 125.94 27486 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF MN -SERVICE-COUNTERTOP INSTALLATION-HOUSING 425.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 27487 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC -CULVERTIBANDS-DRAINAGE CONTROL-STREET 140.88 DEPT 27488 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING DEPT 4.53 27489 JEFFREY CORDES MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 217.50 27490 DENNY COUGHLIN SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 225.00 27491 COPIER ALTERNATIVES COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 83.09 27492 CULLIGAN -METRO SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 33.40 27493 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 9910.37 27494 DAYSTAR BUILDERS REFUND-PARK DEDICATION FEE 840.00 27495 DAY-TINERS INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/PARK 41.14 PLANNING DEPT 27496 DECISION RESOURCES LTD SERVICE-COMMUNITY SURVEY 6400.00 27497 DECORATIVE DESIGNS SEPTEMBER 92 SERVICE-CITY HALL 50.14 27498 STEVE DEMONT ADAPTIVE RECREATION INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 12.32 27499 HILLARY DEPARDE SUMMER ARTS CAMP DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 450.00 27500 DIRECT SAFETY CO GLOVES-UTILITIES DIVISION 164.91 27501 DIVERSIFIED CONSTRUCTION -APPLIED CEDAR TO FRONT OF WALK-IN COOLER-1136.00 LIQUOR STORE 27502 THE DROZDOL COMPANY -SERVICE-STRATEGIC PLANNING-HUNAN 190.00 RESOURCES DEPT 27503 DUSTCOATING INC CALCIUM CHLORIDE-DUST CONTROL-STREET DEPT 5110.00 .04 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY -JUNE & JULY 92 COPIER MAINTENANCE 1598.00 AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 4295612 II ~~-,~:' J) SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27505 ECOLAS PEST ELIMINATION DIVISION AUGUST 92 PEST CONTROL-FIRE STATIONS 111.83 27506 ECONOMY TROPHY PLATES & ENGRAVING-TENNIS PROGRAM 40.50 27507 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE SERVICE -WATER VALVE REPAIR-POLICE BLDG/PILOT 1.1 LIGHT REPAIR-FIRE STATION 27508 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD COVERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 186.63 27509 EDEN PRAIRIE LIL RED GROCERY SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS 12.35 27510 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL #272 -1992 TAX INCREMENT DUE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT 16721.14 ON THE PRAIRIE VILLAGE APTS PROJECT\ 27511 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 ROOM RENTAL-ART & MUSIC PROGRAM 63.00 27512 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 125.00 27513 EDEN PRAIRIE TIRE & AUTO SERVICE WHEEL ALIGNMENTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 77.90 27514 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES -CONSTRUCTED 2 METRIC NIPPLESIVIBRATION 662.75 METER-WATER DEPT 27515 CHRIS ENGER AUGUST 92 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 200.00 27516 ENVIROCON SERVICES -FREON/SHUT-OFF VALVEIHEAD PRESSURE CONTROL 1378.98 -CONTROL/ACID TEST KITIRINK DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 27517 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 601.17 27518 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC MANHOLE LIFT RINGS-SEWER DEPT 2598.60 27519 EXCELSIOR FLORIST EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 47.75 27520 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 865.37 27521 FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO GARBAGE BAGS-WATER DEPT 111.77 27522 FIRST TECH COMPUTER -COMPUTER & PRINTER REPAIR-HUMAN RESOURCES 210.00 DEPT 27523 FITNESS WHOLESALE EXERCISE BANDS-FITNESS CLASSES 64.60 27524 FLAGHOUSE INC CHILD HEADFLOAT-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRA~ 101.15 27525 FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB -PHYSICAL FITNESS EVALUATIONS-POLICE DEPT/ 8024.00 FIRE DEPT '26 FLOYD SECURITY -REPLACED CONTROL PANEL-CUMMINS GRILL 2.3 HOMESTEAD 27527 FOCUS ONE HOUR PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-ASSESSING DEPT 136.65 27528 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS INC PAINT-WATER DEPT 119.06 27529 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE-YOUTH RECREATION PROGRAM SUPERVISO 100.50 27530 JACKIE FRIENDSHUH PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 22.05 27531 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE WOOD AXE HANDLES-FIRE DEPT 53.25 27532 GARDEN DESIGN PUBLICATIONS-PARK PLANNING DEPT 18.00 27533 LISA GANNON -GOLF INSTRUCTOR-SUMMER SKILL DEVELOPMENT 640.00 PROGRAM & SENIOR PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 27534 GELOO SPACE TRAILER CLEANING-POLICE DEPT 42.50 27535 GENERAL MACHINING INC MODIFIED SAW PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 162.00 27536 GENESIS COMPUTERS INC REPLACED COMPUTER FUSE-POLICE DEPT 47.50 27537 GINA MARIAS INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 40.66 27538 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY PAINT THINNER/BRUSHES-WATER DEPT 354.89 27539 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC JULY 92 SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 262.50 27540 W W GRAINGER INC -CABLE TIES/CAULKING/LAMPS/SUB PLATE/NUT & 651. 76 -GUIDE CASTING/AIR COMPRESSOR-FACILITIES DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 27541 GRAYBOW-DANIELS CO DASH:POTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 62.82 27542 GREAT FACES INC FIRE PREVENTION ADVERTISING-FIRE DEPT 31.95 27543 GREEN STREETS RESTAURANT REFUND-LIQUOR LICENSE FEE 3424.00 27544 KARLA GRU It10NT MILEAGE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 26.00 27545 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC -ELECTRICAL CHANGES IN DINING ROOM/PARLOR/ 900.00 BEDROOM & KITCHEN-CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD 27546 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 20.~ 27547 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-MILLER PARK 6011559 r-Ilt-'" b "\ 1\ ' Jj\.... SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27548 HARMON GLASS COMPANY WINDSHIELDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 522.25 .549 HARVEST NOON EXPENSES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT/FIRE DEPT 176.28 550 HEAD LITES CORP BICYCLE REFLECTIVE STRIPS-POLICE DEPT 100.00 551 HEAVENLY HAM EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 215.00 27552 CHRISTINE HElL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 190.00 27553 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINSTRATION 34.75 27554 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 218.75 27555 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS , -FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPTIHOUSING 103.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 27556 HERITAGE PRINT CENTER LETTERHEAD-WATER DEPT 284.39 27557 HOFFERS INC FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 623.03 27558 HOLOGRAPHIC LABEL EMERGENCY CALLS STICKER SHEETS-FIRE DEPT 1150.00 27559 HONEYWELL INC -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-536.56 SENIOR CENTER/LIQUOR STORE 27560 HONEYWELL INC -REPLACEMENT OF INFLUENT FILTER CONTROL 2346.00 SYSTEM-WATER DEPT 27561 HUTTON CHEMICAL -DEGREASER/FLOOR CLEANERILAUNDRY DETERGENT 417.91 EQUIPMENT MAINT 27562 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC LAMPS-WATER DEPT 274.78 27563 INGRAM EXCAVATING -SERVICE-WALK PATH ON ANTLERS RIDGE-2800.00 PURGATORY CREEK TRAILS 27564 INLAND TRUCK PARTS CO -HYDRAULIC BRAKE HOSES/CLUTCHITRANSMISSION 946.36 REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT 27565 INSTY-PRINTS -LETTERHEAD-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/ST&~P-56.66 POLICE DEPT 27566 INTERIM PERSONNEL SERVICES SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE 2308.74 27567 INTL ASSN OF CHIEFS OF POLICE TRAINING WORKSHOP-POLICE DEPT 680.00 4568 GARY ISAACS -SOFTBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS COORDINATOR/ 821. 25 FEES PAID 569 BRENDA JERDE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 315.00 27570 JERRYS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 100.95 27571 CLIFF JOHNSON ~SERVICE-PIANO TUNING-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 55.00 COMMISSION 27572 E F JOHNSON CO PORTABLE BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT 2030.16 27573 JEFFREY JOHNSON SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEPT 426.75 27574 SARA JOHNSON VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 45.00 27575 STEVEN JOHNSON FIRE CALLS 114.00 27576 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES/DUES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 239.76 27577 ELYCE KASTlGAR MILEAGE-ROUND & RILEY LK BEACHES 96.50 27578 KAYE CORPORATION SPOOL OF WIRE-STREET MAINTENANCE 18.59 27579 TOM KLITZKE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 65.00 27580 LEONARD J KOEHNEN -ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR WATER PROBLEM-278.00 RADIO COMMUNICATIONS TOWER-POLICE DEPT 27581 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY GLOVES-WATER DEPT 101.24 27582 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-LABOR ARBITRATION 775.50 27583 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR ., DOOR RE?AIR-FIRE STATION 106.05 27584 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1714.24 27585 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC BUSH CLUTCH-EQUIPMENT ~~INTENP~CE 13.74 27586 ROBERT LAMBERT -DUES/JUNE/JULY & AUGUST EXPENSES-PARK & 727.50 RECREATION DEPT 27587 LAHETTRYS COLLISION -PAINT & REPAIR POLICE VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT 797.60 MAINTENAl\lCE 27588 LARIAT COMPANIES INC TIF SETTLEHENT OF COLUMBINE ROAD 5000.00 .89 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & -JULY 92 LEGAL SERVICE-WETLAND PERHIT 1857.97 ISSUES 2968426 175:r SEPfEMBER 1,1992 27590 LAW ENFORCEMENT TV NETWORK -SEPfEMBER 92 TI NE~~ORK SERVICE-POLICE 388.00 DEPT 27591 L M CIT 2ND QTR WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUM 653.5 27592 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1 4 27593 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC PAINT & REPAIR VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 360.43 27594 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC TRANSCRIPfION SYSTEM-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 482.98 27595 THE LOFT -T-SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM/DAY 495.40 CAMP PROGRAMIYOUTH ATHLETICS PROGRAM 27596 LU~~AN ELECTRIC -SERVICE-REPLACED FUSE PANEL WITH BREAKER 795.00 -PANEL/INSTALLED SMOKE DETECTORS-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 27597 J MARCEL ENTERPRISES UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 159.25 27598 MARSHALL & SWIFr PUBLICATIONS-ASSESSING DEPT 515.00 27599 MASYS CORPORATION COMPUTER SYSTEM/SOFTWARE-POLICE DEPT 10773.75 27600 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE-FIRE DEPT 28.00 27601 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGENIHELIUM-FIRE DEPT 63.87 27602 JULIE MEINZER EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 15.32 27603 MENARDS -STAPLE GUN/STAPLES/CEMENTITREATED TIMBERS! 401.81 -KNIFEIHARDWARE CLOTH/SCREEN-POLICE DEPT/ STREET DEPT/PARK MAINT 27604 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL BOILER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 584.25 27605 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS -1992 REIMBURSEMENT FOR REPAYMENT OF 87385.00 DEFERMENT 27606 METROQUIP INC SWIVEL CASTER-COMMUNITY CENTER 61.17 27607 JASON MEYER MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 115.00 27608 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP ASPHALT-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/SEWER DEPT 4548.11 27609 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ 971.08 SENIOR CENT 27610 MINNEAPOLIS EQUIPMENT COMPANY FUEL COCK-SEWER DEPT 7.i 27611 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 27612 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -GEAR BAGS/REFLEC~IVE EMBLEMS/PANEL SHIELD 270.58 FIRE EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING-FIRE DEPT 27613 MINNESOTA WANNER CO VALVES/FITTINGS/BRASS TIPS-PARK MAINT 73.25 27614 MINUTEt'f.AN PRESS FITNESS PASSES-FITNESS CLASS 68.16 27615 LARRY MOSOW GOLF INSTRUC~OR/FEES PAID 250.00 27616 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 591.02 27617 RICHARD L MUELLER PHD SOFTWARE CONSULTATION-FIRE DEPT 50.00 27618 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP PUBLICATIONS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 187.17 27619 N T 0 A DUES-POLICE DEPT 44.00 27620 JAN NELSON MINUTES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION 175.00 27621 TRACI RAE NELSON MILEAGE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 27.25 27622 WILLIAM T NEWELL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 828.75 27623 SARA RAE NIEMI -SWIMMING INSTRUCTOR-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 13.00 PROGRAM/FEES PAID 27624 BETH NILSSON SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 225.07 27625 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNIQATIONS FACSIMILE PAPER-CITY HALL 180.89 27626 MICHAEL D NORMAN & ASSOC INC SERVICE~LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP 19750.00 27627 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO LIGHT BULBS-FACILITIES DEPT 125.35 27628 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO BROCHURE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 288.18 27629 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT-SEWER DEPT 76.68 27630 OFFICE FURNITURE MART CHAIRITABLE-LIQUOR STORE 371.34 27631 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERIES-FACILITIES DEPT 42.94 27632 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC -CHAIN HOOKSITOW CHAIN ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT 207.87 MAINTENANCE 1.0 27633 SCOTT OMMEN MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 19837067 IT':"~(--i • \::;" SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27634 OPPORTUNITY WORKSHOP INC -SERVICE-REFUSE PICKUP-ROUND LK PARK/ 480.00 COMMUNITY CENTER .635 HARRY ORTLOFF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 455.00 636 P&M MANUFACTURING CO FAUCET HOLE COVERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 23.61 27637 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICAL EXAM-POLICE DEPT 18.00 27638 PEAK STAFFING INC MINUTES-PLANNING DOMMISSION 30.00 27639 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC -CONTROL VALVES/COUPLINGS/CABLES/CLAMP 303.13 Tlr:i'PELTIER ENDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 27640 MILEAGE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 67.50 27641 PEPS I COLA COMPANY POP-SKATING RINKS 67.50 27642 CHERYL C PETERSON UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 114.00 27643 THE PINK COMPANIES DESK DRAWER CRADLE UNIT-FACILITIES DEPT 33.00 27644 PITNEY BOWES INC -POSTAGE MACHINE RENTALS-CITY HALLIPOLICE 595.00 DEPT 27645 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT CO BORE SEAL KIT-WATER DEPT 147.51 27646 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC CURB REMOVED & REPLACED-STREET MAINTENANCE 370.00 27647 POMMER COMPANY INC ENGRAVING MEDALS-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION 74.55 27648 PORT I CO COMPUTERS INC COMPUTER/BATTERY/SOFTWARE-POLICE DEPT 2202.10 27649 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -REPAIR POOL FILL LEVEL EQUIPMENT-391.65 COMMUNITY CENTER 27650 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN -VACUUM UNIT/CHAIN SHARPENINGIWEED TRIMMER 426.57 -STRING/CUTTER EDGEINUTS & BOLTS/GASKET -REPAIR KIT/CLUTCHES/CUTTER/PISTON KIT/ -DRUMIWEED TRIMMER REPAIR-FACILITIES DEPT/ FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT & STREET MAINTIWATER 27651 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING FORMS-POLICE DEPT 130.82 27652 JERRY PRODOEHL EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE 23.10 .653 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE REPAIR-CITY HALL 80.00 654 QUALITY INDUSTRIES INC BEARINGS/BOLTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 37.26 655 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC AUGUST 92 WASTE DISPOSAL 1265.28 27656 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ZAl1BONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 63.20 27657 R T ROOFING -ROOF INSTALLATION-HOUSING REHABILIATION 2870.00 PROGRAM 27658 RAINBOW FOODS EXPENSES-OUTDOOR CENTER 121. 72 27659 SCOTT REIN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 520.00 27660 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN CASH REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR STORE 53.25 27661 RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY SEALCOATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 231.37 27662 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-BRIDGE ABUTMENTS DESIGN-DUCK LAKE 1415.79 TRAIL 27663 MATT RINGERUD GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 930.00 27664 ROLLINS OIL CO DIESEL FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4856.00 27665 RODNEY RUE LICENSE-ENGINEERING DEPT 70.00 27666 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO -OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT/POLICE 424.99 DEPT 27667 SANCO INC -CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/ 243.32 COMMUNITY CENTER 27668 WILLIAM W SCHULTZ' SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 612.50 27669 RON SCHWARTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 90.00 27670 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 37.33 27671 SEELYE PLASTIC INC -ACRYLIC SHEETS/PVC PLUGS/CAPS/ADAPTORS/ 318.51 COUPLINGS-WATER DEPT 27672 KERRY SETTEN HOFFSTROM MILEAGE-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 58.50 27673 STEVE SHEA REFUND-PARK DEDICATION FEE 840.00 .674 SHERMIN WILLIAMS PAINT-SEWER DEPT 56.00 675 SHIELY COMPANY GRAVEL-WATER DEPT 163.44 2131150 17'~ . ' ' :rl/\-N • ,J .... ' SEPI'EMBER 1.1992 27676 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC -SERVICE-COMPUTER CONSULTATION-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 27677 SIGN A RAMA USA -INSTALLED STRIPS & LETTERING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 27678 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC 27679 STEVEN R SINELL UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT AUGUST 92 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPI' LETTERHEAD-CITY HALL 27680 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER 27681 PETER N SMITH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID PROPANE-STREET MAINTENANCE 27682 W GORDON SMITH CO 27683 SHERPA 2ND QUARTER 92 SERVICE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT SERVICE-ROADWAY MOWING-STREET MAINTENANCE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 27684 SOUTHSIDE LAWN CARE 27685 MARY F SPILLES 27686 SPS COMPANIES GATE VALVES/ADAPI'ORS-WATER DEPI' 27687 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-UTILITIES DIVISION 27688 27689 27690 27691 27692 27693 27694 27695 27696 27697 27698 27699 27700 CRAIG STANTON EMMETT STARK STAT-MEDICAL INC STERLING GROUP INC STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION INC SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SERVICE-COMMUNITY BAND DIRECTOR 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPI' SERVICE-CPI' ACQUISITION PHASE -2ND QTR 92 SERVICE-YOUTH COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE STRAND MFG CO INC HYDRANT SHAFTS-WATER DEPI' STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -AMMUNITION/DOOR OPENING TOOLSIBATTERIES/ SUPERIOR STRIPING SUPERVISORY MANAGMENT MICHAEL N SUTTON NATALIE SWAGGERT SYSTEM CONTROL SERVICES INC TARGET STORES -BULBS/BUMPERS/LIGHTBAR SYSTEM/SIRENS- POLICE DEFf/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARKING LOT STRIPING-FACILITIES DEPT SUBSCRIPI'ION-FINANCE DEPT TREE REMOVAL-FORESTRY DEPT AUGUST 92 EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT RADIO REPAIR-WATER DEPT 27701 TARPS INC 27702 THERMEX CORP -FILM-POLICE DEPT/PLASTIC BIN/CONTAINERS/ WASTEBASKET/DISH DRAINERIBEACH CONCESSIONS TARP REPAIR-FIRE DEPT REFUND-OVERPAYMENT MECHANICAL PERMIT -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-BLDG INSPECTIONS 27703 THIRTY-THREE MINUTE PHOTO INC 27704 27705 27706 27707 27708 27709 27710 27711 27712 27713 27714 27715 27716 27717 27718 27719 27720 -DEPT/SAFETY DEPT/OUTDOOR CENTER/SENIOR CENTERIHISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION JEANE THORNE INC MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION KEVIN TIMM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID TODD UNIFORM SMOCKS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT TOWN FLORAL SHOP EXPENSES-CITY HALL JEFF TRESIDDER FIRE PREVENTION ADVERTISING-FIRE DEPT TURNQUIST INC PAPER TOWELS-FACILITIES DEPI' TWIN CITIES DESKTOP PUBLISHING DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO ACETYLENE/OXYGENIHELIUM-EQUIPMENT MAINT UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT UNITED STORES TENT-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS ENTERPRIS CONFERENCE ROOM RENTAL-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT USAQUATICS STRAINER/PH PROBE-POOL OPERATIONS US WEST CELLULAR LEATHER CASES-POLICE DEPT VALERIES FRESH FLOWERS EXPENSES-CITY HALL VAUGHN DISPLAY FLAG REPAIR-CITY HALL MICHAEL VEITH -EXPENSES-FLYERS-ADAPI'IVE RECREATION PROGRAM 3935301 174.00 224.23 319.50 230.00 69.23 2775.50 599.06 60.00 91.83 863.06 288.00 1200.00 246.14 18200.00 2678.00 368.00 4239.81 440.00 32.75 4.0 2 0 891.67 116.36 12.50 7.00 264.09 37.35 552.50 39.50 42.60 85.00 417.27 80.00 79.20 940.81 129.80 196.00 494.70 351.22 74.56 90.47 .~ SEPTEMBER 1.1992 27721 STEVE VERN STRUM • 722 VESSCO INC 723 VlCOM INC 27724 VIKING LABORATORIES INC 27725 VISION ENERGY 27726 VOSS LIGHTING ,. 27727 LISA WAGNER 27728 WBCS 27729 ARTHUR B WEEKS 27730 SANDRA F WERTS 27731 WEST WELD 27732 WEST SUBURBAN MEDICATION CENTER 27733 JOEL WESTACOTT 27734 LOIS N WILDER 27735 SANDY WILSON 27736 WARREN WOLF 27737 THE HALE COMPANIES INC • 738 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 739 BRAD ZIOLA 000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 11000 NORWEST BANK 11000 FIRST TRUST BANK 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 44000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 44000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 26754 VOID OUT CHECK 26856 VOID OUT CHECK 27030 VOID OUT CHECK 27043 VOID OUT CHECK 27060 VOID OUT CHECK 27156 VOID OUT CHECK 27173 VOID OUT CHECK 27194 VOID OUT CHECK 27206 VOID OUT CHECK 21373575 • -ROCKCLIMBING INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM/FEES PAID VALVE YOKE-WATER DEPT -AUGUST 92 WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- COMMUNITY CENTER CHEMICALS-POOL OPERATIONS PROPANE CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER -LIGHT SOCKETS/EMERGENCY LIGHT-FACILITIES DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER RACQUETBALL INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID -SERVICE-FALL COMMUNITY BROCHURE/FLYERS- SENIOR PROGRAMS CONFERENCE-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION MILEAGE-SENIOR PROGRAMS -TIPS/NOZZLESIMAGNETSIHELMET SHADES/ WELDING GLOVES/LENSES-EQUIPMENT MAINT 2ND QTR 92 SERVICE -SERVICE-SOUND TECHNICAIAN FOR STARING LK CONCERT SERIES -MEMOIR WRITING INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR PROGRAMSI FEES PAID -SERVICE-SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER FOR PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM -STUD EXTRACTORS/SCREWDRIVER/PUNCH/CHISEL/ -WRENCHES/TORCH-EQUIPMENT MAINT/UTILITIES DIV BOILht< }:\EPAIR-WATER DEPT 1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS PAYROLL 7-24-92 PAYROLL 8-7-92 PAYROLL 8-:21-92 PAYROLL 8-7-92 PAYROLL 8-21-92 JUNE 92 2ND HALF SALES TAX JULY 92 SALES TAX "",, rz<;sJ 35.00 100.48 7.00 99.50 178.83 90.23 187.50 755.00 17.00 46.85 424.37 375.00 455.00 180.00 50.00 404.10 114.80 132.38 211. 25 181647.50 10669.63 26400.00 15376.69 15339.71 15695.56 5074.00 5228.00 2626.88 39769.03 8246.36- 15.00- 80682.62- 4034.50- 133.64- 109.67- 380.25- 14294.55- 58.95- $1010124.48 • • • ,. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-177 RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR I.C. 52-272 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN BLUFFS EAST 6TH, 7TH AND 11TH ADDITIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100 % of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of H.T.P.O. 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to pub]lsh a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on September 1, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1'7C. l , .. j I !) 1 'V\..:..' • • August 12, 1992 Eden Prairie City Council 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: This letter is on behalf of the Eden Prairie Historical and Cultural Commission to express their support and request additional funding for a planned storage facility at Staring Lake Park. Plans for a storage facility were begun more than a year ago with $17,000 allocated by the City for its construction. During the planning process, a multipurpose approach developed that would locate the building overlapping the Staring Lake Park Amphitheatre stage providing an acoustical backdrop for performances, as well as additional storage for the City sound system, chairs, etc. Plans were developed and the revised design would require $30,000 to complete. The Amphitheatre attracts larger resident audiences to the summer Concert Series each year. Our local production of "Li'l Abner" in June of this year attracted more than 2,000 attendees in just 4 performances. It is not unusual to have 300-400 attendees at each of the 3 weekly concerts. Expanding our ability to store equipment on site, provide a backdrop for improved sound and increase stage usage flexibility, will allow us to continue to enhance future production offerings to City residents. We recommend that this building be funded and completed as it appears in the final plan. We further request that funding previously allocated for a trail along the abandoned railway be transferred to this project. We appreciate your continued support of our efforts related to historical and cultural initiatives in our community. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Deb Campbell Potter, Chairperson Eden Prairie Historical & Cultural Commission • DCP:mdd • RODIiRT J. LANO ROGER A. PAl,.1.. Y DAVID H. OREOERSON" RICHARD F. R.oSOW MARK J. JOHNsON JOSEPH A. NILAN JOHNW~PA JUDITH H. DUTOmlI. BARBARA M. ROSS WJLUAM R. MIlLER TODD A. SATTLER LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. ATIORNEYS AT LAW SUBURBAN PLACE BUILDING 250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 370 EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344 TELEPHONE: (612) 829-7355 FAX: (612) 829·0713 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Barbara M. ROSS DATE: August 26, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposed Franchise Ordinance With NSP MlNNEAPOUS OFFICE 4400 LOS CENTlOR 80 SOt.rnl EIGHllI STRl!l!T MINNEAPOus. MINNESOTA SS40Z (612) 3lS.Q7SS FAX (61:) 349-6718 REPLY TO EtlEN PRAIRIE OFflC£: • This memo is in regard to a proposed franchise agreement with NSF. Although Minnesota statutes provide that cities may reqUire a franchise agreement with public utili ties, the City of Eden Prairie does not presently have such an agreement with NSP. To my understanding, a franchise agreement had been proposed a number of years ago, but it was not approved by the Council. NSF originally proposed that Eden Prairie enter into the franchise agreement form that was drafted by the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) of which Eden Prairie is or was a member, but there were provisions in the SRA Agreement that our office did not recommend. Therefore, the Ordinance that was negotiated between the City staff and NSF is based upon NSP's standard franchise agreement. • Attached hereto is a copy of the proposed Ordinance. My comments are as follows: SECTION 1 section 1 contains the definitions of terms used in the Ordinance. Note the distinction between "Public Way," which means streets, alleys and other '-'public right-of-ways I and "Public Ground," which means park land or open space owned by the City. Public Ways and Public Grounds are treated somewhat differently under the Ordinance, as the placement of electric facilities is more restricted on Public Grounds than Public Ways • -1- 11·,S( SECTION 2 2.1 The franchise is granted by the City to NSP for a period of 20 years from the date the ordinance is effective. The grant of franchise provides that NSP may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities on Public Ways and Public Grounds, subject to the provisions of the Ordinance. 2.3 The rates to be charged by NSP are subj ect to the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Public utilities Commission. SECTION 3 3.1 Provides that Electric Facilities must be located on Public ways so that they do not interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel. but may be located on Public Grounds only as determined by the City. 3.3 Requires that unless there is an emergency requiring immediate repair of Electric Facilities, NSP must contact the City and obtain its permission before disturbing the • . paved surface of any Public Way or Public Ground. The City may reqUire a permit and impose a reasonable fee •• If there is an emergency, NSP must notify the City by telephone and obtain the permit no later than two (2) days after the date of the emergency. 3.4 Requires that any work done by NSF that reqUires the opening of a Public Way or Public Ground must be restored by NSP and maintained in good condition for two (2) years thereafter. NSP must restore the Public Way or Public Ground promptly, or the City may do it and charge NSP for the expense. 3.5 ReqUires NSP to share its poles or towers with the City for other City facilities, unless the City's use will interfere with NSP. The City must pay any added cost. SECTION 4 section 4 permits NSP to trim trees and shrubs in the Public ways and Public Grounds of the City that interfere with the proper construction, operation, repair and maintenance of any Electric Facilities installed under the franchise agreement. NOTE: This is an important provision to NSP and constitutes one of the reasons why NSP has requested a franchise agreement. Pursuant to this prOVision NSF has the authority to trim trees on Public ways and Public Grounds. Presently, since there is no • -2- • • • agreement, unless there 1s a specific easement, NSF is required to get the City's permission before trimming traas and shrubs. SECTION 5 S.l Permits the City to vacate NSP utilities located in any Public Way for a City improvement proj ect and to order NSP to relocate its Electric Facilities upon reasonable notice. NSP must relocate its Electric Facil! ties at its own expense, unless the City orders a relocation within five (5) years of a prior relocation, in which case the City shall reimburse NSP for its expenses. If the subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City utility system to a previously unserved area, NSP may be required to bear the cost of relocation. The limitation on requiring NSP to relocate is that NSP will not bear the expense if the relocation is solely for the convenience of the City. In connection with section 5.1, NSP originally proposed this provision with a ten (10) year relocation provision, and amended it to five (5) years. The Council should determine whether five (5) years is acceptable. 5.2 Provides that the City may require the company to relocate or remove Electric Facilities from Public Grounds, only upon a finding by the City that such Electric Facilities have become or will become an impairment of the public use to which the Public Ground is or ~ill be put. The relocation or removal should be at the company I s expense, but only if the Electric Facilities were constructed after the effective date of this franchise Ordinance. CUrrent Electric Facilities located on Public Grounds are not covered under Section 5.2. However, there is only one (1) Electric Facility located on a Public Ground in Eden Prairie. NOTE: Facilities can be relocated on Public Grounds only if the facilities impair the use of the Public Grounds, whereas facilities can be relocated on Public Ways for improvement projects (See, 5.1). 5.3 Provides that where relocation or removal is due to projects funded by;the state or federal government, the City must reimburse NSP its expenses so long as the City is able to be reimbursed by the state or federal government • -3- ,/. ( ;') ! L Lc~ I SECTION 6 6.1 Provides for NSP to indemnify the City against claims arising from maintenance, repair, operation of, and issuance of permits for, Electric Facilities. The City will not be indemnified for claims arising from its own negligence, except it will be indemnified if it is I negligent in issuing permits or inspecting NSP's work. 6.2 Requires NSP to defend the City if notice of the suit is given by the city to NSP within a period of time where NSP 1s not prejudiced by lack of such notice. SECTION 7 section 7 provides that the City shall give NSP at least two (2) weeks written notice of a proposed vacation of a public way. The City must pay the cost of relocating Electric Facilities on Public Ways unless it is required for a City street or other improvement project as provided in section 5. SECTION 8 Section 8 governs the imposition of a franchise fee by the City. 8.1 Provides that the City may impose a franchise fee of not more than five percent (5%) of NSP' s gross revenues. The franchise fee must be imposed by a separate ordinance adopted by the City Council. NOTE: The City staff had proposed that the City be permitted to impose a franchise fee without limitation, since there is no limitation under state statute, but NSP stated it would agree to a franchise fee of not more than five percent (5%) because that is consistent with other agreements that it has executed. The Council must decide if a 5% cap on the franchise fee is acceptable. 8.2 Defines gross revenues to includes all sums received from customers, excluding any surcharge to reimburse NSP for the franchise fee. 8.3 sets out the means by which the franchise fee may be collected. It states that the franchise fee may not exceed the amount ~'which NSP may legally charge its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such fee and its rates for electric service. Note that a franchise fee will be passed on to NSP customers. -4- • • • • • • i' 8.4 Permits the City to impose a franchise fee on NSP only if consistent with the fee imposed on other energy suppliers, with the exclusion of those suppliers that provide fuel for vehicles. SECTION 10 section 10 contains general provisions regarding the Ordinance, including 10.4 which provides that the Ordinance may be amended but that the amendment shall not be effective for 90 days after the date of the amendatory Ordinance. -5- , '" .' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 31-~2.. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNJSHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY, ITS INHABIT ANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. 1.1. "City Utility System" means the facilities used for providing sewer, water, storm sewer, or any other municipal utility service owned or operated by City or agency thereof. • 1.2. "Company" means Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns. • 1.3. "Notice" means a writing served by any party or parties on any other party or parties. Notice to Company shall be mailed to the Area Manager thereof at 5505 County Road 19, Shorewood, Minnesota, 55387. Notice to City shall be mailed to the City Clerk. 1.4. "Public Way" means any street, alley, or other public right-of-way within the City. 1.5. "Public Ground" means land owned by the City for park, open space or other purpose, which is held for use in common by the public. 1.6. "Electric Facilities" means electric transmission and distribution towers, poles, lines, guys, anchors, ducts, fixtures, and necessary appurtenances owned or operated by the Company for the purpose of providing electric energy for public use. '1 '7/ ':J.. i ~() "J • • • • SECTION 2. GRANT OF FRANCHISE. 2.1 Grant of Franchise. City hereby grants Company, for a period of 20 years from the effective date of this Ordinance, the right to transmit and furnish electric energy for light, heat, power and other purposes for public and private use within and through the limits of City as its boundaries now exist or as they may be extended in the future, subject to the terms and conditions contained herein. For these purposes, Company may construct, operate, repair and maintain Electric Facilities in, on, over, under and across the Public Ways and such Public Grounds of City, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance. Company may do all reasonable things necessary or customary to accomplish these purposes, subject, however, to zoning ordinances, other applicable ordinances, permit procedures, and to the further provisions of this franchise. 2.2 Effective Date Written Acceptance. This franchise shall be in force and effect from and after its passage and acceptance by the Company, and its publication as required by law. An acceptance by Company must be filed with the City Clerk within 90 days after publication. 2.3 Service Rates. The service to be provided and the rates to be charged by Company for electric service in City currently are subject to the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. SECTION 3. RESTRICTIONS 3.1 Location of Facilities. Electric Facilities shall be located and constructed so as not to interfere with the safety and convenience of ordinary travel along and over Public Ways, and they shall be located on Public Ground as determined by City. Company's construction, reconstruction, operation, repair, maintenance and location of Electric Facilities shall be subject to other reasonable regulations of City. 3.2 Field Locations of Facilities. Company shall provide field locations for any of its underground Electric Facilities within a reasonable period of time on request by City. The period of time will be considered reasonable if it compares favorably with the average time required by the cities in the same county to locate municipal underground facilities for Company. 3.3 Street Openings. Company shall not open or disturb the paved surface of any Public Way or Public Ground for any purpose without first having obtained permission from City, for which the City may impose a reasonable fee. Permit conditions imposed on Company shall not be more burdensome than those imposed on other utilities for similar facilities or work. Company may, however, open and disturb the paved surface of any Public Way or Public Ground without permission from City where an emergency exists requiring the immediate repair of Electric Facilities. In such event Company shall notify City by telephone through the office designated by City before opening or disturbing a paved surface of a Public Way or Public Ground. Not later than the second working day thereafter, Company shall obtain any required permits and pay any required fees. 2 116L/ 3.4 Restoration. After undertaking any work requiring the opening of any Public Way or Public Ground, Company shall restore the same, including paving and its foundation, to as • good condition as formerly existed, and shall maintain the same in good condition for two years thereafter. The work shall be completed as promptly as weather permits, and if Company shall not promptly perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment and material, and put the Public Way or Public Ground in the said condition, the City shall have, after demand to Company to cure and the passage of a reasonable period of time following the demand, but not'to exceed five (5) days, the right to make the restoration at the expense of Company. Company shall pay to City the cost of such work done for or performed by City, including its administrative expense and overhead, plus ten percent (10%) additional as liquidated damages. This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to City. 3.5 Shared Use of Poles. Company shall make space available on its poles or towers for City fire, water, utility, police or other City facilities whenever such use will not interfere with the use of such poles or towers by Company, by another electric utility, by a telephone utility, or by any cable television company or other form of communication company. In addition, City shall pay for any added cost incurred by Company because of such use by City. SEc:TION 4. TREE TRIMMING Company may trim all trees and shrubs in the Public Ways and Public Ground of City interfering with the proper construction, operation, repair and maintenance of any Electric Facilities installed hereunder, provided that Company shall save City harmless from any liability arising therefrom, and subject to permit or other reasonable regulation by City. SECTION 5. RELOCATIONS 5.1 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Ways. Except as provided in Section 5.3, if City determines to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line or the use of any Public Way or part thereof, or construct or reconstruct any City Utility System in any Public Way, it may order the Company, upon reasonable notice, to relocate its Electric Facilities located therein. Company shall relocate its Electric Facilities at its own expense. City shall give the Company reasonable notice of plans to vacate for a City improvement project, or to grade, regrade, or change the line of any Public Way or to construct or reconstruct any City Utility System. If a relocation is ordered within five years of a prior relocation of the same Electrical Facilities, which was made at Company expense, City shall reimburse Company for non-betterment expenses on a time and material basis, provided that if a subsequent relocation is required because of the extension of a City Utility System to a previously unserved area, Company may be required to make the subsequent relocation at its expense. Nothing in this Ordinance requires Company to relocate, remove, replace or reconnect at its own expense its facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconstruction is solely for the convenience of the City and is not reasonably necessary for the construction or reconstruction of a Public Way or City Utility System or other City improvement. 3 -I '. f1 ' /' 0'v • • • • • 5.2 Relocation of Electric Facilities in Public Grounds. Except as may be provided in Section 5.3, City may require Company to relocate or remove its Electric Facilities from Public Ground upon a finding by City that the Electric Facilities have become or will become an impairment of the public use to which the Public Ground is or will be put. The relocation or removal shall be at the Company's expense. The provisions of 5.2 apply only to Electric Facilities constructed in reliance on a franchise and Company does not waive its rights under an easement or prescriptive right. 5.3 Projects With State or Federal Funding. Relocation, removal, or rearrangement of any Company Electric Facilities made necessary because of the extension into or through of a federally-aided highway project shall be governed by the provisions of Minn. Stat. §161.46 as supplemented or amended. It is understood that the right herein granted to Company is a valuable right. City shall not order Company to remove or relocate its facilities when a Public Way is vacated, improved or realigned because of a renewal or a redevelopment plan which is financially subsidized in whole or in part by the Federal Government or any agency thereof, unless the expense resulting therefrom are first paid to Company, but City need not pay those portions of such for which reimbursement to it is not available. 5.4 Liability. Nothing in this Ordinance relieves any person from liability arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid damaging Electric Facilities while performing any activity. SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the City free and harmless from any and all liability on account of injury to persons or damage to property occasioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, inspection, the issuance of permits, or the operation of the Electric Facilities located in City. City shall not be indemnified for losses or claims arising out of its own negligence, except for losses or claims arising out of or alleging City's negligence as to the issuance of permits for, or inspection of, Company's plans or work. City shall not be indemnified if the injury or damage results from the performance in a proper manner of acts reasonably deemed hazardous by Company, and such performance is nevertheless ordered or directed by City after notice of Company's determination. 6.2 In the event a suit is brought against the City under circumstances where this agreement to indemnify applies, Company at its sole cost and expense shall defend City in such suit if written notice thereof is given Company within a period wherein Company is not prejudiced by lack of such notice. If Company is required to indemnify and, defend, it will thereafter have control of such litigation, but Company may not settle such litigation without the consent of City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immunity otherwise available to City; and Company, in defending any action on behalf of City shall be entitled to assert in any action every defense or immunity that City could assert on its own behalf. 4 /<t. ( ( ('lov SECTION 7. VACATION OF PUBLIC WAYS. City shall give Company at least two (2) weeks prior written notice of a proposed • vacation of a Public Way. Except where required for a City street or other improvement project as provided in Section 5, the vacation of any Public Way, after the installation of Electric Facilities, shall not operate to deprive Company of its rights to operate and maintain such Electric Facilities, until the reasonable cost of relocating the same and the loss and expense resulting from such relocation are fIrst paid to Company. In no case, however, shall City be liable to Company for failure to specifIcally preserve a right-of-way, under Minn. Stat §160.29. SECTION 8. FRANCHISE FEE. 8.1 Separate Ordinance. During the term of the franchise hereby granted, and in lieu of any permit or other fees being imposed on Company, City may impose on Company a franchise fee of not more than fIve percent of Company's gross revenues as hereinafter defmed. The franchise fee shall be imposed by a separate ordinance duly adopted by the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least 60 days after written notice enclosing such proposed ordinance has been served upon Company by certifIed mail. The fee shall not become effective until at least 60 days after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon Company by certified mail. Section 10.2 shall constitute the sole remedy for solving disputes between Company and City in regard to the interpretation of, or enforcement of the separate ordinance. A separate ordinance which does not impose a uniform fee on all revenues within the definition' of gross revenues shall not be effective against the Company. 8.2 Terms Defined. The term "gross revenues" means all sums, excluding any surcharge • or similar addition to Company's charges to customers for the purpose of reimbursing Company for the cost resulting from the franchise fee, received by Company from the sale of electricity to its retail customers within the corporate limits of the City. ' 8.3 Collection of the Fee. The franchise fee shall be payable not less often than quarterly, and shall be based on the gross revenues of Company during complete billing months during the period for which payment is to be made. The payment shall be due the last business day of the month following the period for which the payment is made. The percent fee may be changed by ordinance from time to time; however, each change shall meet the same notice requirements and the percentage may not be changed more often than annually. Such fee shall not exceed any amount which Company may legally charge to its customers prior to payment to the City by imposing a surcharge equivalent to such fee in its rates for electric service. Company may pay City the fee based upon the surcharge billed subject to subsequent reductions to account for uncollectible or customer refunds. The time and manner of collecting the franchise fee is subject to the approval of the Public Utilities Commission, which Company agrees to use best efforts to obtain. Company agrees to make its gross revenues records available for inspection by City at reasonable times. • • • • 8.4 Conditions on the Fee. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against the Company unless it lawfully imposes and the City quarterly or more often collects a fee or tax of the same or greater percentage on the receipts from sales or energy within the City by any other energy supplier, provided that, as to such a supplier, the City has the authority to require a franchise fee or to impose a tax. The franchise fee or tax shall be applicable to energy sales for any energy use related to heating, cooling, or lighting, as well as to the supply of energy needed to run machinery and appliances on premises located within or adjacent to the City, but shall not apply to energy sales for the purpose of providing fuel for vehicles. SECTION 9. CHANGE IN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Any change in the form of government of City shall not affect the validity of this Ordinance. Any governmental unit succeeding City shall, without the consent of Company, succeed to all of the rights and obligations of City provided in this Ordinance. SECTION 10. PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE. 10.1 Severability. If any portion of this franchise is found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, the validity of the remainder shall not be affected. 10.2 Default. If either party asserts that the other party is in default in performance of any obligation hereunder, the complaining party shall notify the other party of the default and the desired remedy. The notification shall be written. If the dispute is not resolved within 30 days of the written notice, either party may commence an action in District Court to interpret and enforce this franchise or for such other relief as may be permitted by law or equity for breach of contract, or either party may take any other action permitted by law. 10.3 No Third Party Benefit. This Ordinance constitutes a franchise agreement between City and Company as the only parties and no provision of this franchise shall in any way inure to the benefit of any third person (including the public at large) so as to constitute any such person as a third party beneficiary of the agreement or of anyone or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a party hereto. 10.4 Amendment. This Ordinance may be amended at any time by City passing a subsequent Ordinance declaring the provisions of the amendment, which amendatory Ordinance shall become effective upon the filing of Company's written consent thereto with the City Clerk within 90 days after the effective date of the amendatory Ordinance. SECTION 11. PUBLICATION EXPENSE The expense of publication of this franchise Ordinance shall be paid by Company . 6 SECTION 12. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. • FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the _ day of , 199_, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the _ day of , 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John Frane, City Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _ day of _______ ,' 1992 . 7 ,.c;, ,f L1 I l>..tJ J • • • • • EXCERPTS OF MINUTES OF _______ MEETING OF mE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN, COUNlY MINNESOTA ________ , 19_ A meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, duly called, convened, and held in accordance with law, was called to order by Mayor _________ on the _ day of , 19_, at o'clock _.m. at the Council Chamber in said City. The following members, constituting a legal quorum were present: Councilperson _______ introduced a certain Ordinance No. __ _ entitled: AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN IN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION LINES, INCLUDING NECESSARY POLES, POLE LINES, FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRIC ENERGY TO THE CITY, AND ITS INHABITANTS, AND OTHERS, AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS OF THE CITY FOR SUCH PURPOSES. and on motion made, seconded, and duly adopted, the above-entitled Ordinance was read. Thereafter a motion was made by Council person and seconded by Councilperson that· the above-entitled Ordinance be adopted as read and in its entirety. //1] On roll call the vote was as follows: AyES, ______________________________________________ ___ NAyS, __________________________________________________ __ The Mayor then declared said motion duly carried and the above-entitled Ordinance duly passed and adopted, and ordered the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with the law in such case made and provided. I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I am City Clerk of the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that I am custodian of its records, that the above is a true and correct copy of a part of the minutes of the meeting of the City Council of said City held on , 19 __ . City Clerk • • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council members THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager ,/) /// Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works "~ , i/ , FROM: DATE: July 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Tree Planting in the Right-of-Way SUMMARY: The City Council has asked that a report be prepared regarding the feasibility of planting trees in the right-of-way of our street system. The question about whether trees can be planted in the right-of-way has always been easy to answer --absolutely! The issue as to whether or not it is advisable to do so has always been the point of debate. In collaboration with Stuart Fox, I have attempted to summarize our own opinions on this matter as well as information gleaned from other communities in the area. If, after reading this information, the City Council chooses to proceed with some form on right-of-way tree planting program, it must be with the understanding that it will be an increased service level for our community and appropriate funding must be dedicated for the program. Aesthetics is the only reason to consider tree planting within City right-of-way. All other beneficial aspects of urban forests (and there are many) can be accomplished by plantings outside of the right-of-way. DISCUSSION: A number of issues surface when a discussion of planting trees in the right-of-way occurs. As indicated, aesthetics is the single reason to place the trees in the right-of-way, while such things as cost, tree health, space availability and traffic issues are a few of the counter points. By general category, the balance of this memorandum attempts to summarize the non-aesthetic issues for your consideration. Adequate Room For Growth: Depending ()n species and care, trees can be planted virtually anywhere, but the growth rate and life expectancy will vary greatly depending on where it is planted. For example, an urban street tree, such as on Nicollet Avenue has a life expectancy of twelve years. Whereas, we have seen many examples of 200-year old Oak trees in an undisturbed setting within our community. Trees need adequate room to develop a proper root system in order to grow to their potential. When a tree is in a close proximity to asphalt there are many more problems with heat stress due to reflected heat. In close proximity to the streets, salt damage can be a major retardant to tree growth since salt can accumulate in the soil for a potential long term affect. !7'7~ Additionally, many of the potentially disease resistant tree varieties that are available for planting • have a different branching pattern than the American Elm --the historic street tree in our country. Horizontal branching on trees planted too close to the edge of the street make them susceptible to damage from vehicles until the tree has matured enough to gain clearance height. There are some proported disease resistant Elm trees and such trees as the Hackberry that tend to have the vase shape associated with the American Elm that creates a cathedral-like canopy over the street. However, some experts would suggest that tree varieties be varied greatly to limit the possibility of a major impact due to a "Dutch Elm" disease. The result is that we wouldn't necessarily get the kind of effect that many people imagine in a boulevard tree planting program. Why Does It Work In Minneapolis?: Minneapolis has an active boulevard tree program that probably grew out of necessity. There are many areas in Minneapolis that have lots that are only 40 feet wide and set backs from the right-of-way that are 20-25 feet. The result is that there is very limited room to plant trees on private property and the right-of-way is the only available space. Additionally, Minneapolis was developed with an overhead wiring system and has limited buried utilities in the boulevard area. In Eden Prairie and virtually all the newer suburbs, all utilities are underground. Eden Prairie, like many cities, have had standards for a number of years regarding specific locations for each of the underground utilities. Exhibits A through E show the typical street sections in our construction standards. Most of our residential streets are 50-foot right-of-way widths with a 28-foot street. There are four utilities which must go in this right-of-way area (cable television is not shown) which would be in conflict with tree planting. While not an insurmountable ~ obstacle, this conflict does not exist in a Minneapolis system that has the overhead utilities in _ an alleyway. If trees are to be accommodated in the right-of-way, it would be necessary to provide enough room to reduce the potential conflicts. This could be done in two ways --by widening the right- of-way or requiring that the utilities relocate outside of the right-of-way. The City of Eagan, for example, allows tree planting in certain right-of-ways, but their minimum right-of-way width is 60 feet compared to 50 feet in Eden Prairie. St. Louis Park has an active tree planting program, but again has a minimum 60-foot right-of-way width. The City of Plymouth does not allow tree planting in new developments, but they do some of their own planting on their higher type facilities (such as Municipal State Aid streets) each year. These right-of-way widths are usually 80-100 feet, which allows for proper space. In addition, Plymouth has required that utilities be placed in a lO-foot easement on private property adjacent to the City right-of-way. Maple Grove allows tree planting in the boulevard by policy, but residents are strongly encouraged to plant trees in the area of 15-25 feet from the back of the curb. Maple Grove has a minimum 60-footright-of-way with a 30-foot wide street. Finally, the Minneapolis street system is a grid system and the resulting effect for the canopied boulevard trees is quite dramatic. It should be noted that Eden Prairie has generally a curvilinear street system which will not result in the same effect. /170 • Maintenance Issues: As previously indicated, salt damage can occur to trees planted too close to the street. However, we do have a need to provide some space for snow storage in the winter months. At the current time, we use very little salt and sand on low volume residential streets. That could be changing, since there has been some move towards classifying the sand residue that we sweep up each spring as a hazardous waste. If that occurs, a higher percentage of materials that we use on the street for ice control will salt. Additionally, a particular problem exists with trees being planted in cul-de-sac areas. Snow plowing on cul-de-sacs is extremely difficult at present due to mailbox, driveway and fire hydrant locations. If more of the available snow storage space is dedicated to trees, this essential maintenance function could be greatly hampered. A limited amount of damage can be expected with trees close to streets resulting from root damage which can cause some heaving of sidewalks and curb and gutter. This can be somewhat controlled by tree selection, which can also minimize the difficulties with root problems in sanitary and storm sewers --a potential cost to both the City and private property owners. Obviously, this can also be limited by proper location of trees away from service lines. One of the largest unknowns that we have in the suburban area is the actual longevity of underground utilities. At some point utilities such as telephone, cable television and power will have to be replaced. It is clear from the Exhibits A through E that space is available beyond the current utility location requirements. However, when it is time to replace one of these existing systems, an alternate location must be utilized in order to keep the old system in service until the new system can be brought on line. This essentially results in a need to have two . locations available for each buried utility. Early in the decision making process to require utilities to be buried, the expectation was that the longevity for these systems would be as great or greater than overhead utilities. However, these is every indication that this may not be true and that a more frequent repair and/or replacement program will be necessary. Traffic Issues: Boulevard trees can cause some difficulties with sight distance at intersections. This can be alleviated with specific standards regarding distance from intersection, etc. Additionally, trees in a boulevard situation can conflict with traffic signage. This of course can be mitigated through a trimming program and/or sign relocation. Cost: The City of Minneapolis has a total budget for their forestry program of $5,700,000 per year. This budget is in place to maintain both boulevard trees as well as trees in their park system and on public property. With this budget, they maintain a trimming program on a 3 to 4% year rotation and they perform all of the maintenance on right-of-way trees, including replanting, removal and inspection. Although the Minneapolis program is huge, it does lend credibility to the idea that some proportion to population can be used to determine budget needs for a more intense forestry program. For example, the City of St. Louis Park has what appears to be a very simil~ program with a total budget of approximately $500,000. St. Louis Park employs five full tIme people to perform all of the aspects of their program. Exhibit F is a compilation of three memos from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department dated October 31, 1989; November 15, 1989; and August 8, 1990. These memorandums were provided ~o the City Council at one point and attempted to identify the cost necessary for landscaping medlans and major intersections in the Major Center Area. While the memorandums dealt wi~ flo~ers a~ well as trees, it does give an indication of the cost associated with tree plantIngs In the nght-of-way. '---I) J I .'" Cities such as Maple Grove and Bloomington require that the homeowner be responsible for • maintenance of trees within the right-of-way adjacent to their property. In conversations with those communities, they admit that the system has not been tested with an aging tree population or a widespread disease problem. One interesting hidden cost aspect that turns out to be significant came from a conversation with the <;ity of Hopkins. Hopkins does have a program to plant boulevard trees and has done so for yeats. One of the resultant maintenance requirements is that leaves falling from these boulevard trees must be removed each fall and spring or else the catch basins tend to plug up during rainfall and snow melt situations. Hopkins has found that people tend to take advantage of this situation and deposit leaves from their property on to the city street for removal by the city. The result is that they have inadvertently increased their service level for their residents in a rather round-about way. Cities that do leaf removal do have a significant cost, equipment and manpower commitment for these programs. CONCLUSIONS: As indieated earlier, the only reason to consider tree planting in the right-of-way is for aesthetic purposes. The purpose of this memorandum is to allow the Council to make a policy decision regarding the issue of tree planting in the right-of-way and to be able to answer the primary counter point to the aesthetic value of trees in our community right-of-way system --at what cost? . The City has committed to development of an urban landscaping scheme in the Major Center Area for selected streets at a cost of $1,600,000. In addition, approximately $2,400,000 has been earmarked for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. Both of these projects will include tree plantings within the right-of-way and on City property. I would suggest that in this segment of the community we have a decision to proceed with right-of-way planting and that it can be accommodated within the right-of-way or on adjacent property. As these plans are fully developed, the Parks and Recreation Department can more fully develop a cost estimate to maintain these landscaped areas. On the other extreme, it would be my recommendation that tree plantings not be permitted in 50-foot right-of-way residential areas. Almost all the communities that I spoke to do not allow plantings in this narrow of a right-of-way. I would further contend that a 4-foot difference between where a tree could be planted within the right-of-way and placing it outside the right-of- way would be negligible in the overall character of the street seape. In other words, keeping trees back from the curb line would give the streets a similar character to some of the communities that allow the trees in their IS-foot boulevard, yet we would essentially avoid all the cost of maintaining the trees and most of the utility conflicts. As indicated in the memorandums from the Parks and Recreation Department, MnDOT and Hennepin County will essentially not allow us to plant within their right-of-way. If we eliminate the 50-foot right-of-way and as discussed previously deal with the Major Center Area in a special way, that leaves us with our collector street system and some of our Municipal State Aid • streets. These street systems however are the very ones that we do install sidewalks and trails • for pedestrian systems, which reduces the space availability for tree planting. If the Council determines that provision for tree planting should be accommodated within the right-of-way, I would suggest that it be on the following basis: • Right-of-way widths be increased by a minimum of five feet and more desirably ten feet on those locations where trees are planned to be installed. • The location should be by permit only, which would limit species and location. • Staffing levels be increased in order to handle the maintenance and permitting process of the trees. • Plantings be limited to wider right-of-ways that accommodate our collector and MSA roadway facilities. • A more precise· utility location plan would have to be negotiated with the electric, telephone, gas and cable television companies. This would also require some strategic planning regarding the future of sidewalks in our community so that trails and sidewalks can be accommodated into the plan. • The initial attempt would be on the basis that the homeowner would be responsible for maintenance in residential neighborhoods (with a strong possibility that they could become City maintained trees in the future). ALTERNATIVE: My recommendation would be an alternative that would include the Major Center Area planting as proposed along with generally maintaining the right-of-way free of tree plantings. In order to accommodate tree plantings within the right-of-way, a higher spending and service level will ultimately be necessary which would include such things as planting, trimming, removals and potential leaf pick up. We could achieve very nearly the same effect in our street scape if developers were required to plant one or two trees one to three feet outside of the right-of-way line as part of the subdivision process. Existing neighborhoods could be encouraged to do similar plantings and perhaps some sort of tree planting plan could be subsidized by the City for the area immediately adjacent to the right-of-way. Dsk:GD:TREEPLNT . ROW : (~,-""I -' ." ..................... ---_.- " N ~\" ~ ::0 rr1 (.f) o rr1 U>Z-1 ~-1-< -1»""0 or~ Z\r rn z (j) z rn f"T1 ::0 z (j) 0 f"T1 ""0 .-1 3: Z o ::0 3: z Z rT1 u> 0 -1 » () -1 -< 0 11 f"T1 0 rr1 z ""0 ;0 » ;0 f"T1 I CD t)I ~ .. SO· RIGHT OF WAY 28' (8-8) .... - 14' 1 I ) I 1 1 ) I ) -(,0 ~ 3 'iii l1... , 0 CD I-- I -(\j (!) I""l 0: -0 (,0 ~ 0 0 (\j TYPICAL RESIDENT IAL-COLLECTO R SECTION ~ 0 0 10 Z 3 0 0:: U -L{) d ~ 0 0 ~ flO 7' W I- 0 Z -0 L{) 0 -I""l 0 -I""l 0 w 0' ~ z'j IlL.«:::>c!, O::Ui 0 0 0-www -.J w(DO -.JI--o -.JQ..w (DI---«a:(/)~o:: «:::>(/) II-w ~(!)I U) (/) (Do. I _ 0:: 0:: I--:::>cal-- -w 0 o 0 (/)V:::>O ~CD~ °NUZ-.J en 0:: 0:: _ « ««O«-.J W w:::>--UN > o.l-~<to:: 0:: _ ~:::!I-WO« <{Wi :::>OXO::Z 0::1--0:: OU)W <to Q..W CDQ.. ::I: w a:::::! OZUOCD ZU<t -lI-O-lo::O:: WZI--.J-0:::> <t :::> OOW «-V U) ~ > I-wug -N ::I: l-I-- 0:: U) 0 <t o WATERMAIN Z w --0 SANITARY SEWER I I--I-- :::> U) 0 w (/) 3 0 STORM SEWER GAS (EITHER SIDE) TELEPHONE (EIT HER SIDE) POWER ( EITHER SIDE) 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE rvll NNE SOT A ENGINEERING DEPT. R-3 1 I I J 1 I 3 D J ] 1 'J J 1 J I 1 1 I r , CD J CD TYPI.cAL INDUSTRIAL SECTION : ,';:' .: , I;' z 3 o 0::: U 10 o - ---r--O WATERMAIN <0 CD 0:::= ::J- u J 0::: W..J 1--w<t_ 0:::1-U) uWw zoo 0--u U) 0::: roW::r: -1-1-11-0 I.O::JCD CD(!)_ N -f---0 SANITARY SEWER ro o STORM SEWER o GAS (EITHER SIDE) o TELEPHONE (EITHER SIDE) o POWER (EITHER SIDE) ::r: I-t-o::: U) o <t z W 1-85 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPT. R-4 ~ 0 0 Iii Z ~ ~ N 0 cr: >-U <l !!= -10 lL OJ d 0 I I-m :x: ~ (!) -co (i: ~ -0 co ~ 0 0 rt'i TYPICAL M.S.A.8 COMMERCIAL SECTION -0 I<) C\I -I<) -N -10 0 OW dl o ~CD -I~ I-:X: <l ~ CD--IN U > ~ ~= <l I--IWI-:x: <l X ,:) -I (/) ':)1 (/) w:E::::>O U~ -0 (/)::!ZOCD W-I 00 Z ~ 1--~(/)°<llLW W<l __ <la..O 0:X: ~ I-(/) >0(/)0 I-UWW WI-W ~ 0 ZOO -I lLWW-I 0--~=~ 0 (/) ~ -I . U (/) a::: CD a.. --<l (/) CO W :x: W_CD<l <t -I-I--I>~a:::~OW I I-0 -I<lI-=>WZcr: 1.0::::> CD W <l :x: (/) U cr: <l <l CD(!)_ .- O~ N :x: Z l-I- cr: (/) 0 <l Z w o WATERMAIN 0 SANITARY SEWER :x: l-I- ~ (/) 0 W o STORM SEWER (/) ~ 0 GAS ( EITHER SIDE) o TELEPHONE (EITHER SIDE) 0 POWER (EITHER SIDE) 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK (BOTH SIDES) -85 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA ENGIN EERING DEPT R-5 J I J ) J ) J J J J 'J J 1 1 ) ] ] J , • t->-<l: :: LL III 0 I ..... CD ~ ::I: <!> -v a::: r0 -0 co TYPICAL M.S. A. (NO PARKING) SECTION r'i, i / {i . -..!? 0 0 ~ Z ~ 0 a::: u -10 0 d to -I<) ~ -I<) 0 0 ~ -0) 0 cO Ow _r a::: CD ...J~OI<ta::: CD~ <t N ..... U >::::> a::: = I<t ...JW ..... ::::>1 U) ..... ::::>...JU) Ua::: "X:::;: ::::>-...JW 0 0 W...J U)-OOZOCDa::: ..... -a:::U) Z w W <t • <tQ..O<tu..I a::: ..... ~ >00 0 ..... uW~ W ..... U)O 0 ZOO ...J wa::: O~ -::::>: g, W W...J U U) Ov U)0...J. a::: III .. ~<l:U) <X> w I W9:Ill<l: <l: -.......... .. ...J>a:::a::::::;:OW 1 ..... 0 W ...J<l: ..... ::::>wZa::: to::::> III I-<l:Icnua:::<t<t CD l!) ..... 0 -N Z ::I: ..... t- a::: U) 0 <t Z w 0 WATERMAIN 0 SANITARY SEWER I ..... ..... ::::> U) 0 STORM SEWER 0 w ~ (J) 0 GAS (EITHER SIDE) 0 TELEPHONE ( EITHER SIDE) 0 POWER (EITHER SIDE) 5" CONCRETE SIDEWALK ( BOTH SIDES) 1-8 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRI E MINNESOTA ENGIN EERING DEPT. R-7 TO: THRU: MEMORANDUM Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect~ DATE: October 31, 1989 SUBJECT: Landscaping Medians and/or Major Intersections Landscaping within center medians is an eye catching way to beautify the city of Eden Prairie. Before decisions can be made as to how and where the landscaping should be placed, the parks, recreation and natural resources staff has gathered the following information and concerns: DESIGN A wide array of design alternatives are possible, using plant materials, paving, planters and lighting as the basic building blocks. The different colors and textures of plant materials should be utilized to provide the most impact and visual stimUlation. Flowers in bloom all season would provide the biggest splash of color. Annual flowers bloom more profusely all. summer in a wider variety of colors than do perennials. Shrubs provide some screening between lanes and provide vertical relief to the flatness of the roadway. Flowering shrubs will add color as well as height to the median. A plain green shrub mass would provide a solid backdrop accentuating the color of the flower beds. ' Trees planted within medians provide shade from the heat and glare of roadways. Trees also define the roadways channeling the vehicle through a space rather than across a flat sector of pavement. Other amenities that help decorate landscaped areas are special paving such as brick, colored concrete and bomanite. These paving surfaces clean up edges, and keep maintenance for turf areas to a minimum in an attractive way. Planters for shrub masses and flower beds are commonly used to add interest and give height, and they also break the monotony of roadside plantings. Decorative lighting is also an item that would give character and identity to the medians within the City. ( A myriad of possibilities exist for design of these medi;::ms. Budget, safety, and maintenance concerns are factors that -",ill influence the design of these areas. LOCATION Highly visible places for planting landscape materials have been identified on a map. They have been broken down into major entrances into the city, major or visible intersections, and existing medians which could be landscaped. The Minnesota Department of Transportation owns all right-of-ways along I494 and 212/169. They are responsible for all improvements and maintenance to these highways. I was unable to reach the key person to get preliminary approval, but in my discussions the following unofficial information and concerns were obtained: • The median strips between the road sections in this area are used as drainage swales during storms and are not available. • If permission is granted to plant along some of the upper slopes, maintenance of these areas is the responsibility of the City. • A concern was expressed as to how city cre\vS would access the site. Due to the high speeds 0 these roadways, cars at slow speeds entering, exiting or working could cause a serious risk to health and property. Hennepin County is responsible for two large stretches where medians occur. The first is Valley View Road from Mitchell Road east to Highway 169/212. The second is Mitchell Road from Valley View, south to Highway 5. I spoke to Dennis Hansen with Hennepin County and he expressed the following thoughts and concerns: • Maintenance is currently the responsibility of the County. If the city does any planting it would be up to the City to maintain the medians. The city would have to accept liability for all plant materials lost due to snow removal and storage, salt and chemical damage or accidents. • The County would not approve anything that vehicle should jump a curve. Tree trunks would be examples of unyielding obj ects. flowers or shrubs would be acceptable. was unyielding if a and light standards Hansen stated that site distance problems at intersections would need to be addressed so shrubs would not block views . • The city would 'have to go throu~~ a permit process, but he didn't see any reason it would not be approved if we complied \'lith the above concerns. The city of Eden Prairie maintains the medians along Prairie Center Drive from Highway 5, south along the ring road and bac}:, up to , r:-Ii I' G • 169/212, and also along single Tree Lane. Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works, expressed similar thoughts and they are as follows: Maintenance was his biggest concern and he wanted the Park Department to be responsible for maintenance incl,,:ding plllnt replacement if any landscaping should occur. He sa~d the g~ts "lots of complaints about the maintenance of the med~ans str~ps and would be very glad for somebody else to assume the . headaches" . , • Most of the utilities are buried in the ROW, but medians should be clear with the exception of electric wires for stop signllls and storm sewer. He thought for the most part they would be deep enough to not cause us any problems . • Mr. Dietz stated he was not concerned with maintenance vehicles if the city was careful to avoid busy times during the day to service the medians. Entrances to the city have been identified on the map. Pri:mary entrances would be the MnDot Highways 494, 169/212, High~vay 5, County Road 1, Dell Road, Eden Prairie Road, Baker Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. These well travelled entrances into the City are prime locations where landscaping could occur to announce Eden Prairie. County Road 18 is scheduled to be upgraded within the next 5 years. This construction schedule may affect timing or coordinating joint efforts. Major intersections which are very visible or heavily traveled have also been shown on the map as possible sites for landscape improvements. Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works for Eden Prairie, had more concerns with planting off the streets in the ROW areas than in the medians. He said in order to keep costs down, most City streets only have a 50' ROW. The city also requires new developments to bury electric, telephone, and cable TV lines during construction. With a typical road at 28' it only leaves 11; on each side of the roadway to bury gas lines, electric lines, water lines, cable TV and telephone lines. Underground utilities will be more prevalent at intersections where new subdivisions and building has taken place. City Code directs property owners not to install plant materials within the City ROW to keep clear of all of these buried utilities. Mr. Dietz also stated that visibility and site distance problems can occur when plantings are within the ROW, and feels the City policy is a good one. A property owner can plant a tree on their property 11' from the roadway, which also gives the city room to store snow without damaging trees. Limited tree and shrub planting would still be acceptable as long as utilities and site distance are respected. Flower beds would .. ' for the most part, not lnterfere wlth site distance or utilities . 1174 c / l Planters could also be utilized to keep clear of utility lines and to give intersections a more polished look. COST AND MAINTENANCE Due to the wide variety of design options and the different sizes of medians, the following cost projections are preliminary and are intended to give a ballpark estimate for comparison and discussion. Further cost estimates need to be undertaken as the designs are more finalized. In order to facilitate discussion, I have broken the medians down into 4 categories to give estimated costs. The drawing shows a sample of what each category could look like. Please keep in mind these are only possibilities and not the finished product. Broken down cost estimates are on the attached sheets, but bottom line costs for an average median of 13,000 sq. ft. are shown as follows: 1. flowers only -$6,970 per median 2. flowers and shade or ornamental trees -$7,020 per median 3. trees, shrubs and flowers -$7,925 pr median 4. shrubs and flowers -$8,700 per median For the most part estimated prices include labor for installation. Construction and landscape projects such as this are nOrr.lally contracted out due to the heavy work load of our city crews. The flower planting will be an annual event and it is the only cost estimate that the labor for the city crews have included. T\vO estimates are listed for the City personnel. 4A is the cost for seasonal help assuming $6 per hour. 4B is the cost of our full- time help using the $6 per hour figure. In order to simplify the bottom line, I have used the seasonal help figure in the total since if this project were implemented, more seasonal people would .be needed. Maintenance cost have not been included in these cost estimates. The cost of maintaining these medians will vary greatly depending on what is planted, detailing and if the median is irrigated. COSTS FOR TREES AND SHRUBS Occasionally a shrub or tree will need to be replaced due to drought, snow storage, or salt damage, but the expense will not be incurred each year. Maintenance for trees and shrubs will require daily or weekly waterings while the plants arc young, but when the plant is established and edging and mulch is used and properly installed, maintenance costs are reasonably low and for the most part limited to weekly watering, ~eeding and litter pickup. Annual flowers will be an ongoing yearly expense. Costs each year must include the price of the flowers, as well as labor costs for installation and maintenance. Mid May is the best time to plant annual flowers and unfortunately it is also one of the busiest times for our park maintenance crew. In order for this project to .~ i~ -!J 1 008 6.c\\)Gf"S 01 L,(, !-AND"'U. pi. ';"l<'r6Sl...:...A..c.;f'-,!l>oo~ ___ _ • -MAOE BY tp:« DATE (O-ZS -r;S .;C8 NO. ______ _ ... ~ =I_lq-,,-..oI 0 1M;:, ,:~ ::.;;;;:!I C,TY O""CfS CHECKED BY DA TE _____ SEC. SHT N . _____ _ ~--;: -''''-:::::'1~9 S...a'O(NPA_IAt' "OAO ".t -~c:lfiCauon .orltem Nun\Oer 2 (O'N PA"'H'I. ",""lSor" ....... ,... ~!"\JCI? A( ,... 0 ~ r,A 1,1 -, b,VYJ cc. CALCULA TlONS FOR .:ie~_~~\~"'~'_W-ILty--'~...!!::l:::l.!:...i..=,--'~~_ --=-.;.:._~_ J.._...J...;:=--____ _ Item Oucriotion end Un't of Me:lSllf. r,B fT..tv Ilt/l:~ -nrJ-P. ~104-/Iry):)~ Unit PrlCI! _tl--_;.._m_o'_'n..,.....t __ Ooll.'~ C.",,-r C~IIJr; I C.nn dO 00 '2.0'2., 00 00 \/0 :::, 00 I .----------------------------------~----~~------~~----------~---------Spcc.fic;u.on ~>0~.:c\~,oi:.J Un., P"c~ ..l.moun, or ,,~m . It~m OescrlOtion UNIT ;:..C ,'"' 0 10 ~--,.---l-----r--- NunlOer 8nd Unot 01 Me~~r. C\.l"'" /,~,,-;\... " ()oll~n '=.n'~ a~lld,: C~n., I - r:r~-r;A(..LATTOI-J t£..f:;:..SQ NA(..... 2D , (,-(/\ '". I ; I zroz 00 00 ~\OO LoOO 00 e ~ :i!:. '0 JOB'I?E EC ~ P..J)"",,S c. f1 O)JEg'-~)2,..<'~+j~c:::e:, \A~-;'j A:,\.t: ____ r, I I • • ~~ MADE BY b:J:... OATE IO-2~-'~ .lca NO, iild9:':-=l, , -' C'TY""'cn . CHECKED BY' DATE _____ Sc:C. SHT NO. _____ _ -.... -!'fI.oO (O(N PRAIA,. "040 t (O(N PAAIM, •• MINN.SOTA ...... 14.. ",,-..... n" .-I • A.-:: 0 " "I \?--' 1 rv"'\ ?:F-C CUL TlONS FOA r-'h-: .. r"r...... ,......'t"".;-. • I ; AL A .~ ! l -'. 0/ I lion ~ Un If P"'CI! ":'mount Itt!rn Item OeSCrlotion UNIT -;:..c. ,\~\ 010 'JoIIJ" 1 -::.ntt NunlCer Ind Un.t 01 Me~sur. c.0 .... ....... "''' C.:)ft~l~ I C~nt' \ \'~'(" IhlTE-t--y...t:.. P~"0 (~"-J .~ \ \ 'i2SV10JI::; -ru c. -n u.,... H~F 20 0-.) '2~2. 00 -=at \.... &''' DE£p ~ r~UZ.E ... ~ 40 Z-LP.£!loCX) ~r W ITI-t H-AND MtSf 4-00 S2. 2> l2a A.c:AsI ~ PP-Ef... f""'X? .. (:?. /~ I FlOWE12-s' MSf ~ 00L \4D ~ e; II 'csppc..n,"1 1..1 0 00 .~ 4A~ \ NSiP-u..ATIO"',\ ~ ~~ H~f loa .:.0 ~crD ql.o , .- '-l' \ NSTt..u..,...AI. ot--.J l~ ......... R;u... T1 HE... CIT'( HSP 2-00 .;Ie;.) ~\"?J loO / -~~? ~ \I P.;f P.,:) ~ ~ \~T'..,...l..l:..A. -no",1 \~Dct:.i zoo 00 \ bOO 00 CEC Sh~026 zt co~:~c:g-.~ to /1'~.sTP-lJ.,AnOI',l I NCJ....U . \ \ 00 \ q ~fJ 00 0t-1p.Go5 .::l/2:>c..o ~ 7 I NSTA.l,..L.A:11 m-J \ N::.!.D bCD z~ 00 400 00 .~ CJ 1::.;0:;:) -I /.....\ST7~·LL..SD -Nsf ~ 'Z 2-2.- z..o Il11 l?" 9 L.t.NOSS~f..., Et7c,l N~ LF-.~ 1 0 1 \4-00 Fb v---'1",. -, t' 4-t;( 6' y ?I ~ 1.-~ l~:' ,'-.Jf '-., <-~yr-'") ( ~ \ Yl0LG!-t c..-f &>0 1?J~ co _ ..... .~ -1,9z:2-~I IOlN P "IHI. I CALCULATIONS FOR ~_,)~SAr!P HC:Sl.AI'..J -~>:J !r"',,)"::~ C , . S~.fic3I1on ~ Unit Pr,c!, I ":'rnounl -<,. \ ' or lI.em Item Oucrlotion UNI, -;:..c. ,'"' "10 NunlOer and Un.t of Me;}1Ut. c.0 '" ~":-\o«'-~oIlJr, Ct n ,,:. t I C~nn C~" . .,: 61~~~f-A1ID:'\ ~ \ Wf-f ~ -n u.,.. ~ <-f-/(;P W 00 Zbz.... a.:l (..0' -r:?_Cp I ~ '. fSr~~ ~ 40 LP.;6/IOCO sP '\tJ\-n-t &--.NO Msf 4--00 '?Z Z, -:;-r _~_UAD£P- /~ CJ f1..o,.A)Cf-<; ~ 2,70 00 \4oS co u" ~Pf-.<:..r ~ MSp- *" IN S1P-I...u.6-::11or-J HSP ~ 4f-... t£P~ t-..,l.1:\. '--~.? r03 00 SS4 ~o ~ \1 ~TP-.l.. .. l.A -no~ ~ 40 ft.J.L-T1 fv1 e.... MSf 2E--a c.c:) \S40 CO C ~ ~t4-1;Q? W' e;"~ iQ SA. ~ IS ~':J 00 S00 ::\::l 16H~UCS CC)\,\ 'J-;J ~!o ~ La ~ IF? 00 41S0 00 ~ ~lE.-~'( Y 00 S\ \ co --, 0" -SH ffl')ISri Z?;, , Nc.t....UO~ 6?J\."lUlI\\Z.. ~sc:.... ~ 6 M0LCJ-\ c.F== ~ GO \oC1 &:) ~ ~I-..\ VJ::n.-:J t:{-hps ~'tE[~ :: .... -- ~ ~ ~ --l 610"::\ ~ ~ =-~.~ !'.-'i-a . I I , -It I be implemented and still get our parks ready for use, additional help must be obt<lined . Additional seasonal park maintenance peop~e or contracted employees would be realistic, since the scale of th~s project would probably be larger than volunteers would undertake. Watering flowers is also labor intensive. With little shade and the heat from the surrounding pavement, our park crews estimate watering will be needed every other day unless rain is frequent. The city has two water trucks, which according to union contr<lC~S can 'only be driven by full-time City personnel at the $16/hour- labor rate. Our Park Manager estimated $10 per 1000 sq. ft. or 131 per median for. each time the flowers are watered. The City water trucks are shared by the Park Department and the street Departme~t. Use of the water trucks is not guaranteed, especially when c~~y street ~rews are. seal coating roads and trails. The city also have two pickup trucks with tanks that will hold 250 gallons of water. These trucks may be driven by seasonal help in at the lower hourly rate, but it would be a much slower process due limited capacity and pressure. The Park Manager estimates both trucks would be in service the majority of time if all the medians are planted, removing two trucks from the city fleet. Other costs involved with flower maintenance to keep them looking good, would include weeding, removing dead flower heads to stimulate blooming and litter removal. Sad· has also been included on the plans as a possible ground cover to break up flower and shrub beds. While probably not as labor intensive as flowers, sad needs to be cut, trimmed, and watered to keep it looking good. Mowing and trimming costs are estimated to be $8 per 1000 sq. ft. using City equipment and seasonal help. The costs that have been presented this far are costs for an average 13,000 sq. ft. median. They vary somewhat in size and shape, but 34 medians exist within Eden Prairie and could be part of an overall beautification scheme. Costs are shown below for each one of the 4 categories including maintenance. Estimates include the following assumptions. Flower watering is done with full-time people and the City water truck 3 times per week from May 1 to September 15th. Mowing is done with seasonal people once a week fr~m Ap~il 8 to octobe 7 20th. Dividing the maintenance figure by 34 w1ll g~ve you the ma~ntenance cost for an average median. #1 Flovlers materials and labor annual maintenance. 12 Flowers and trees materials and labor l annual maintenance -water $226,440 • mOHing $16,320 $236,953 267,240 $504,193 $238,572 242,760 $481,332 #3 Flowers, Shrubs and Trees materials and labor annual maintenance #4 Shrubs and Flowers. r , materials and labor maintenance $269,365 128,922 $398,293 $296,119.60 189,720.00 $485,840.60 The figures above present a more realistic view of costs to do all the medians wi thin the City. Maintenance expenses are ongoing yearly expenses. Once the project is started materials and labor expenses are also ongoing expenses when flowers are part of the design. An irrigation system is something that should be discussed as part of this project. Although, initially very expensive, the installation of an irrigation system would solve many problems. It would eliminate the availability problem of getting the water truck and leave the 2 pickup trucks free for watering plants and flowers within the parks system. It would also eliminate anv traffic hazards created by the water truck as it is parked next t; the median or while accessing the site. Preliminary cost estimates show a system would be approximately $500 per 1000 sq. ft. to irrigate, or about $6,550 for an average median. If all the medians in town were done, $222,700 would be the projected cost. The payback period for only flowers would be less than one year. The payback time for flowers, trees and shrubs would be 1.7 years. Other suggestions to cut down maintenance expenses Would be to maximize the use of shrubs and trees saving flower beds for accent areas. The use of hard surface materials around sign posts Would save weekly trimmings. Techniques such as week control fertilizer . , edging and mulch can also greatly cut down ma~ntenance expenses. STAFF RECOr~1ENDATIONS This project has the potential to make our city a truly beautiful city. Virtually everyone driving by will notice our landscaped medians. This project also has the potential to be a real source of complaints, if initial design~and ma~ntenance are not what the public expects to see. Whatever the C~ty does must be done well and taken care of properly in order to achieve the goals of beautifying the City of Eden Prairie. There are two ways to begin a project like this depending on the objectives of the Commission and Council. The first is to do a 11g I • I' Cr • large area very simply such as trees in the medians and increase plant materials as money is available. The other option for implementation is to take a small area and focus time and money on an area that shines. The first scheme would make an impact on a large number of people due to the area the improvements cover. The second scheme would make a large impact on a smaller number of people because it is limited in only one area. Both of these strategies have merit. Consistency in design and materials will be crucial to keep the project tied together. , One suggestion, if the Commission wants to pursue this, is to select the intersection of County Road 4 and Valley View Road. The entire western half of this highly visible intersection is already owned by the city. If money is available, medians could also be developed. QUESTIONS THE COHMISSION AND COUNCIL SHOULD ADDRESS ARE: Location of Improvements 1. Where are the improvements going to be located? Medians and or intersections? 2. Should the project be phased? What areas are most important and would give the most impact for the dollar? Design Concerns 1. Which option (l-4) is best for the city considering all factors? 2. Are there some options not shown which would work better? . Budaet Concerns 1. Where will the funding come from? 2. Who will organize funds from business leaders? 3. How much money is needed or available? Safety and Maintenance Concerns 1. Should the City pay to irrigate the landscaped medians? 2. Should the City allow trees islands? BPC:mdd (unyielding objects) on center C, l MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission THRU: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect~~ DATE: November 15, 1989 SUBJECT: Follow-up to Landscape Medians Staff has done another cost estimate for medians using the existing sod and planting salt tolerant shade trees 25' on center. Two cos~ estimates sheets are attached. One includes the cost for irriga- tion, the second includes maintenance costs for watering. Both estimates include mowing and trimming costs for each growing season. A typical median is 800'. At a spacing would be needed for an average median. balled and burlapped trees is $200 per for 30 trees. of 25' on center 30 trees The estimated cost for 30 tree installed, or $6,000 Mowing wi"ll be a yearly maintenance expense. For estimating purposes, I have made the following assumptions. Mowing would be done with seasonal people calculated at $8 per 1000 -sq. ft. or $105 per median per mowing. * Costs for 28 mowings are $2,940 per year. Watering trees can be done in two ways. The first is an irrigation system. An estimated cost for an irrigation system for an average median is $6,550. This is a one time expense for the initial installation. Watering can also be done with the City crews using a water truck. The following assumptions were made for cost estimates. Water truck would be used once a week with full-time personnel. Costs are estimated to be $10 per 1000 sq. ft., or a $130 per watering. The watering season would be approximately from May 1 through September 15th. Total watering costs for the summer would be $2,600. Watering in this fashion would be necessary once a week while the trees are young and then subsequently dependent on weather. Start up costs for this landscape improvement program would be $11,540* for a s~stem,with ~ur ,CitX crews doing the watering, or $15,490 for a medlan wlth an lrrlgatlon system. Yearly maintenance costs for the irrigated syste,m would jUst be mmving and trimming for about $2,940 per year. Maln~~nance costs without an irrigation system would be $2, 9~0 for, mowlng ,and $2,600 for watering, for a total of $5,550. Agaln, thls waterlng would be necessary while the trees are young, and dependent on weather thereafter. Costs for shade trees in the medians along Prairie Center Drive from Valley View Road to 169 have been calculated based on 4800 • • • linear feet. Initial costs with an irrig<ltion system for the entire project would be $92,940. Maintenance costs for mowing and trimming for the entire project would be $17,640 per year. Project costs for the landscaped medians not including irrigation would be $69,240. Maintenance costs for mowing, trimming and watering would be $33,240 per year. If the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission decides tO,go ahead with this project, thought should be given as to how this plan will be implemented. Questions for discussion might be: 1. What are the next steps in the process? 2. Who will coordinate the project? 3. Who will contact private businesses, clubs, etc.? 4. How will money accounts be set up for donations? *28 mowings will be required if the medians are mowed once a week from April a-October 20th. BL:mdd /'l0{{ ,~ - -------------~JO~G~\=.:~~:t,1~C;0~=:'~~p: .. d v 1 f C i e ['15 :q:£~ =.7"0 Z..:-S.J..' __ Q-::.=C-__ _ ~ MAOESV Cpt: , O"E 1\-1"2-i'0 '08 NO. _____ _ ." d-'=J'" CH~cvED 8V ______ DATE: _____ SEC. SHT NO ___ _ CITY ('J"'(:'fS l;, ~ ?-.r.:0' . . _,or= ::=.>4 ·""".0 ... •••·•·• on·o 1 __ ~ ... _\ _ ......... r. OJ ..... "'.., ....... 0-1.11:--\ .0 .... ·.·", .... · ...... 0............. i'.l'.'-. ..I.':~ UI' '-t~··lrl'-~ ~l', IiIIIl=-M*-.a___ CALCULA TlONS I=OR -L.ficatlon or itorm Nun\Cer ( ., Item OHcrlotion UNIT Un" P,.ee I .,lo.tT\oun, Ind Unit 01 MeJsur. \ N \11 h..:t./ \ I ~ \2;0 = ~ "\\, I I?D 00 f ----~----------------------------+-----~------~+_----_r--_+-/~.--.--~--~ 7 l ( ( UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES CO~M. Nov. 6, 1989 VIII. -8- REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Reoorts of Landscaoe Architect 1. Landscaoing and Flowers for Medians Refer to memo dated October 31, 1989 from Barb Cross, Landscape Architect. Cross said she toured the landscaped medians in the Twin Cities area prior to doing her report. • She said that flowers provide the biggest accent, shrubs provide screening and vertical relief to the flatness of the road, trees provide shade and prevent glare. Special paving and decorative lighting can also be used. In discussions with MnDot, Cross was told that median strips between road sections are used as drainage swales and are not available for landsca~ing. Maintenance is the responsibility of the City and they had a concern with the crews accessing the site because of the high speeds of traffic on these roadways. Hennepin County said that the City would be responsible for any damage that Occurred due to snow or salt and they could not approve anything that is unyielding to a vehicle, i.e. tree trunks and lights. Site distance problems at intersections would also have to be addressed. The Public Works Department said that maintenance is their biggest concern. Medians should be clear for landscaping and he was not concerned with maintenance vehicles working in these areas if they avoid the busy times of the day. The major intersections into the City which should be considered for landscaping are 494, Hwys. 169/212, Hwy. 5, Co. Rd. 1, Dell Road, Eden Prairie Road, Baker Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway. Planting in the right-of-way is not recommended except for shrubs and flowers or possibly planters. Cost estimates are as fOllows: flowers only $6970; flowers and trees $7020; trees, shrubs and flowers $7925; shrubs and flowers $8700. These cost are per median and include installation and labor. An average median is 1800' long and 13,000 sq. ft. 170'7 I • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989 ~ -9- Baker asked how much of the cost is labor. Cross said that if seasonal help is used, the cost would be about $1500 and if full time help is used, the cost would be about $4000. Cross added that the initial cost is more for trees and shrubs; however, this is nota cost that is incurred every year. Flowers are an ongoing expense and would have to be replaced annually. Cross said that two water trucks are shared by the Park Department and the Street Department and can be driven by full time personnel only at a cost of $16 per hour. Use of these trucks is not guaranteed. There are also two pickup trucks with water tanks that can be driven by seasonal help, but watering would be done on a much slower basis. Other costs involved with flowers include weeding, removing dead flower heads and litter removal. There are 34 medians in the City. Total costs for all medians are: flowers only $504,193; flowers ( and trees $481,332; flowers, shrubs and trees $398,293 f and shrubs and flowers $296,120. Cross added that ~ an irrigation system should also be discussed at a cost of $6550 per median or a total of $222,700 for all medians. Cross felt that there were two ways to start a landscaping project. One is to do a large area very simply and the other is to do a small area very well. Staff's suggestion is to start with the intersection of Co. Rd. 4 and Valley View Road near Round Lake Park. -Cook said he does not agree with starting in Round Lake Park. Lambert commented that Barb's report was not meant to discourage the landscaping project, but rather to advise the commission what expenses would be involved. He added that the City Council is looking at cutting back the budget and does not know how they would feel ~bout a project of this type. He agrees that one area should be done initially to see what the reaction is and whether any local businesses would be willing to fund it. ~ - -------------- ( ( l UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. Nov. 6, 1989 t • -10- Mikkelson commented that he did not think the suggestion was to do the project on such a large scale. Baker said he feels the City Council should be _approached with the suggestion. He has discussed the project with several people and one idea was to have a contest in 5 to 10 locations perhaps with materials donated by the City and have civic organizations either provide the labor or donate money for the project. Lambert said that in speaking with the City Manager, using volunteers or civic organizations would be working in a median would be a liability concern. Baker said that perhaps the City could ask for contributions and erect a plague announcing the sponsor. Lambert suggested planters at intersections because of all the underground wiring in these locations for traffic signals, etc. Cross said she hesitates to provide a landscape in plan for intersections because they are all so different. Cook said he feels that residents of Eden Prairie will be of the opinion that funds should be used for other purposes rather than landscaping. • • Richard said he feels that Prairie Center Drive from Rainbow to Lunds is an important area to consider landscaping for three reasons: many businesses are located in this area, there is a good deal of traffic and there are large medians to work with. He said the landscaping should be kept very simple and done completely through donations. Joyer commented that residents took notice of the flowers that were planted at Staring Lake. She felt that landscaping should begin at Round Lake 6r Riley Lake, but is in favor of the idea. Helling said she feels that the intersection by Round Lake park_would be a~ ideal location to begin. She felt that elther the Llons Club or Optimists Club might be willing to fUnd it. • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM . Nov. 6, 1989 -11- Mikkelson agreed and added that a plague showing the sponsors of the landscaping would be seen easily, as many people walk in this area. MOTION: Richard moved to recommend that the landscaping project in Eden Prairie begin by planting trees along the boulevard 30' from center on Prairie Center Drive from Valley View Road to HWy. 169 and that Barb Cross bring designs and costs for this project back to the commission with the objective that the City spend no money. On call for discussion, Cook said that he feels landscaping at Round Lake Park should be done separately regardless of the decision made on landscaping in other areas of the City. Karpinko seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. B. Reoorts of ManaGer of Recreation Services r. Adaotive Recreation PrOGram Update Refer to memo dated October 30, 1989 from Beth Timm, Adaptive Recreation Supervisor. Beth reported that the adaptive recreation program was begun 18 months ago and includes both segregated and integrated programs. She showed the commission a slide show on highlights of the program during ( the. summer. 103 children participated in the" program, 8 of them from Eden Prairie. Eden Prairie is the newest member of the cooperative program which also includes Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Some activities included in the program are playground, art camp (Edina), swimming lessons and teen center (Bloomington). 2. Youth Athletic Association Aopreciation Dinner Helling said that a recap of the event and expenses involved were included in the packets. 135 people were invited and.~8 attended. 16 businesses donated door prizes valued at $450 for the event. Expenses included $400 for Mark Rosen as the speaker, printing costs, a plague for each of the athletic association presidents, supplies, hors d'oevres and dinner which were contracted with the school district. ~ - 1&100 I . ( MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~ DAT~: June 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Landscape Medians ======================================== The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission have spent a number meetings discussing city beautification. One of the major areas of concern is the grass median strip along Prairie center Drive in the Major Center Area. The Commission requested infor- mation on the cost to construct and maintain landscaping within these medians. Attached to this memo is a memo from Barb Cross with projections for construction and maintenance of various land- scape designs. Upon review of those figures, the Commission agreed that installation and maintenance of large flower beds in those areas is probably not feasible at this point in the City's develop- ment, but also requested that landscaping of medians be discussed with the City Council at a special meeting. ( Some suggestions for improvements to medians include: installation of trees, and smaller areas of flower beds at a limited number of intersections. It has been suggested that perhaps a landscaping plan for all of Prairie Center Drive should be developed and included in the tax increment financing program for street improve- ments in this area. ( '- commission members have also discussed the desirability of improving the image of Eden Prairie by landscaping or planting flowers along state and County roads where they enter the Eden Prairie City limits. Bud Baker suggested that the City strongly urge th: state and County to do that sort of thing to Highway 494, State Hlghway 5, and 169 before the PGA in 1991. Commission members will look forward to discussing these ideas at the July loth meeting with the City Council. BL:mdd medians/10 • • { • TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources~ August 8, 1990 SUBJECT: City Beautification ======================================== At the August 6th meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Council agreed that at this point the City cannot afford any extensive landscaping or beautification projects. The City Council is very supportive of this concept and agrees that planning should be initiated to allow for those projects, especially in the Major Center Area and on key inter- sections within the city. The City Council encouraged the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to consider the following: 1. Encourage or assist in the development of an Eden Prairie Garden Club that would coordinate and initiate these various beautification projects. 2. Contact city businesses to determine if they would consider partnerships on specific beautification projects in their part of the City. 3. Develop an overall concept plan for ultimate development of medians in the Maj or Center Area to insure that when road proj ects are upgraded there is sufficient room for' tree plantings, irrigations systems, and flower beds. 4. Contact the School District to determine if elementary schools are interested in developing 'flower bed plantings at the school/park sties. 5. Research other State or County agencies that may have grant dollars available for beautification projects. 6. Contact the Twin City Tree Trust to see if they would be willing to plant flowers or help develop planting beds. ,,> 7. Contact Eden Prairie public service organizations, such as the Lions, the Eden Prairie Foundation, etc. to see if they're willing to participate in any particular project. .' .. '. . . "'-..I. .}). • f. , ••• }. '. ,' •• _. The Council indicated that it was very important to "do it right" by insuring that planting beds have irrigation systems to insure that they don't become an eyesore, rather than something of which people can be proud. Council also believe that by developing beautification projects people become more interested in, and aware of, the environment and the beauty of our community. BL:mdd beauty/IO • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John D. Frane, Finance Director DATE: August 28, 1992 SUBJECT: Location of Liquor Store #1 We have two proposals for renting space for the store presently located in the Prairie Village Mall. Prairie Court Shopping Center (just east of the present store): Base Rent $7.50 per square foot -1st 5 years $8.00 per square foot -years 6 through 10 CAM capped at $1.50 per square foot -1st 5 years $2.00 per square foot -years 6 through 10 3 Months free rent $6,000 moving allowance They will pay for the sign on the store front Prairie Village Mall (present location) They will match the base rent Common area maintenance is currently $2.56 per square foot - no cap No free rent $4,000 remodeling allowance The costs of renting at Prairie Court is about $5,500 a year less. We do not believe that sales will decrease if we move. Recommendation: We recommend execution of a lease for the Prairie Court location. JDF: jdp 1)04- • • •