Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/07/1992• • • AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 7 , 1992 *6:00 P.M. -CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Doug Tenpas, Dick Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock COMMISSION MEMBERS: Bette Anderson, Virginia Gartner, Pete Iversen, Dacia Henderson, William Jackson,K. Ramakrishnan, Judy Schuck, Linda Senes, and Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. COUNCIL AND COMMISSION STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Director of Human Resources and Community Services Natalie Swaggert, Communications Coordinator Karen Michael, and Council Recorder Kate . Garwood. ROLL CALL II. III. IV. V . CALL MEETING TO ORDER -Mayor INTRODUCTIONS REVIEW OF COMMISSION'S 1992-1993 GOALS DISCUSSION OF A TOWN MEETING: "Diverse Perspectives on Living in Eden Prairie" ADJOURN HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION Goals for 1992-1993 1 . South Hennepin Regional planning Agency The Commission will review and interpret the demographic details provided by South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency to determine implications and priorities for future needs. 2. Human Rights The Commission will become more involved in human rights in order to better understand the minority groups that exist within our community, including the disadvantaged and people with disabilities. The Commission will collaboratively plan and coordinate an event to celebrate the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. and will look for opportunities to support and work with advisory commissions and community organizations in their activities in the area of cultural diversity. 3. Americans With Disabilities Act The Commission will develop an understanding of the Americans With Disabilities Act and act as a catalyst to increasing awareness of the acts requirements throughout the community. 4 . Rental Code The Commission will provide the required support to the City Council in order to finalize a rental code for the City of Eden Prairie and will assist in the publicizing of the code after it has become a City ordinance. 5 . Access to Medical Care The Commission will become informed about the issue of access to medical and dental care for low income Eden Prairie residents and will encourage solutions to improve that access. 6. Habitat for Humanity The Commission will study the feasibility of a Habitat for Humanity program in Eden Prairie. 7. City Hall and Senior Center The Commission will make recommendations for and assist in the planning of the community service aspects of the new City Hall facility and the Senior Center improvements. Goals continued on next page- • \ • • • • • Human Rights & Services Commission . Goals 1992 Page Two 8. Child Care The Commission will define new options for using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for subsidized· child care and will visit the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association to learn about their procedures and operations. The Human Rights and Services Commission continues to have an interest in the following areas: a. Increasing its knowledge of the organizations it funds; b. Encouraging and supporting the activities of the Eden Prairie Community Needs & Resources Council; c. Utilizing available communication vehicles to promote its programs; d. Continuing the training of Commission members in the No-Fault Grievance process and increasing the awareness of that process within the community. e. Reviewing and monitoring development proposals that have an impact on special populations of the City; f. Supporting the dedication of a portion of the proceeds from lawful gambling for human services purposes. g. Increasing its knowledge of transportation issues and services impacting Eden Prairie; h. Offering assistance to the School District and the City in their affirmative action efforts; i. Monitoring the level of services and programs offered to the Seniors in the community. 3/18/92 pb: hrsc business/goals Proposal: Background: JOINT CITY/SCHOOL TOWN MEETING PROPOSAL Diverse Perspectlves on Living In Eden Prairie Plan and present a public forum, a "Town Meeting" on discrimination in our community. c0- sponsored by the City of Eden Prairie and IDS 272 (Eden Prairie), on the evening of Odober 27,7:00 -9:30 p.m., at an Eden Prairie site to be determined. Members of the Eden Prairie Human Rights and Services Commission have been participating on the Eden Prairie Schools' Multi-Culture, Gender Fair, Disability Aware Committee. A subgroup on Community Development h:u: propot,ed itrategiei for growing an aWlur.nf".'\.\ within the community about the discrimination that occurs here. A town meeting format was proposed for an initial project. Current thinking is that the town meeting may be one of several activities that may include follow-up opportunities for persons to participate in change agent skill building exercises, speakers and in-depth presentations, planned opportunities to experience the arts and culture of communities of color, multi-cultural book clubs, the annual Martin Luther King Jr. birthday "Celebration of our Diversity", and perhaps a second follow-up town meeting. MismonjPurpOC8! "To incrll:u:8 community :lWireneH of our bia~t"s, as'ium[llinn'i, anft [lrf'Jnrtirr.1\ that may influence our actions, and identify ways we can take more individual responsibility for creating a more inclusive environment in Eden Prairie" Format: The meeting will be moderated by Oliver Singleton, a professional experienced in such forums. After explaining the goals of the evening and showing a video "True Colors·, Singleton will set ground rules and proceed to the panel segment. Singleton will question individuals on a panel about their recent experiences with discrimination • in this city. • • The panel wil1likely include a local high school student of color, a disabled (deaf?) resident, an African American, and Asian immigrant, a low income resident, and someone who has experienced gender slurs and harassment. • Ground rules will allow no name calling, no finger pointing, controlled emotions, and an atmosphere that holds that all opinions are valid. • A short open mike session will follow the panel's revelations. Representatives of the city, school, perhaps other organizations will briefly tell about the positive steps that are occurring to address unacceptable events and practices. The audience will be broken down into small groups that will discuss steps that should be taken. Notll: 1).rill be tlken :lnd ~ iummary created and sent In (til pilrtiripants. There will be a wrilten evaluation form to be filled in and a short wrap-up. Planned Communications: Publicity will be through the newspapers, school and city newsleuers, flyers sent home with elementary age children and possibly left in windshields at church and other parking lots, a brochure mailed to local civic organizations and churches; and possibly posters. Anticipated Costs: $1500 to moderator 700 for communication vehicles and postage 200 back-Up for refreshments and xeroxed hand-outs .J.QQ for meals for panelists and moderator for meeting prior to public meeting $2500 anticipated budget, some of which may be donated or in-kind • • • • AGENDA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1992 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: HOUSING & REDE;VELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: I. ROLLCALL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Chair Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Executive Director of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority Chris Enger, Finance Director John D. Frane, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and HRA Recorder Kate Garwood n. CALL MEETING TO ORDER m. APPROVAL OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES FROM MEETING HELD TUESDAY. MAY 19.1992 IV. RESOLUTION lIRA NO. 92-04. AWARDING SALE OF $2.640.000 LEASE . REVENUE BONDS V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY • TUESDAY , MAY 19, 1992 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: I. ROLL CALL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Hall Council Chamber 7600 Executive Drive Chair Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. J ullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Executive Director of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority Chris Enger, Finance Director John Frane, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, City Attorney Roger Pauly • Chairman Tenpas called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. All members were present. n. MINUTES FROM HRA MEETING HELD TUESDAY. MARCH 3. 1992 MOTION: Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Pidcock, to approve the minutes of the HRA meeting of March 3, 1992. Motion carried unanimously. m. HRA RESOLUTION NO. 92-02. SETTING SALE OF LEASE REVENUE BONDS FOR THE EDEN PRAffiIE COMMUNITY CENTER Staff explained that HRA approval of the sale of lease revenue bonds for the Community Center was required prior to any further action. The resolution would set the date of June 16, 1992, for the sale of lease revenue bonds, for the amount of $2,360,000. MOTION: Commissioner Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 92-02, Setting the Sale of Lease Revenue Bonds for the Eden Prairie Community Center. Motion carried on a 4-0-1 vote, with Commissioner Pidcock abstaining. • IV. • V . • • OTHER BUSINESS A. BRA RESOLUTION NO. 92-03. DESIGNATING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS AGENT FOR BRA WITH RESPECT TO ICE ARENA IMPROVEMENTS AT COMMUNITY CENTER MOTION: Commissioner Jessen moved, seconded by Commissioner Harris, to adopt Resolution #92-03, Allowing the City to act as the Agent for the HRA for the Ice Arena project. Motion carried on a 4-0-1 vote, with Commissioner Pidcock abstaining. B. DECLARING CONDITIONS OF LEASES AS UNACCEPTABLE WITH RESPECT TO PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 8100 MITCHELL ROAD Attorney Pauly stated that the terms and conditions of the existing leases at 8100 Mitchell Road had been reviewed and found unacceptable. The HRA was required to officially notify Norwest of their concerns within a specified time period, or waive its objections. MOTION: Commissioner Pidcock moved, seconded by Commissioner Jessen, to authorize the HRA Staff to send a letter to Norwest stating the HRA's objections to the terms and conditions of existing leases at 8100 Mitchell Road. Motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Commissioner Jessen, seconded by Commissioner Harris. The meeting adjourned at 8: 15 p.m . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. '92-04 RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,640,000 LEASE REVENUE BONDS (COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT), SERIES 1992A; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE AND PRESCRIBING THE FORM THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST AND A LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Authority is considering a project (the "?roject"), to be undertaken pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.012, Subdivision 1(7), consisting of the construction of an addition and improvements to a ccmmunity center facility (the "Facility") located on certain real property (the "Land") in the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota; WHEREAS, there is a need for providing the public facilities comprising the Project and it is desirable and in the best interest of the Authority to encourage and assist in the Project; and WEEREAS, it is proposed that the Authority issue its' revenue bends pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sec~ions 469.034 and ~69.03S, and Chapter 475, as amended, and pursuant to a Trust Indenture, dated as of August 1, 1992 (the "Indent'..lre n ), between the Autherity and , as Trustee (the ~Trustee"), to provide funds to fi~ance the Project, and lease and agree to sell the Project so acquired and constructed to the City ef Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), pursuant to a Lease-Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1992 (the "Lease"), betwe~n the Authority, as lessor, and City, as lessee; WHEREAS, all bonds issued under the' Indenture will be secured by a pledge and ass~gnment of the Lease and of the revenues derived by the Authority from the Project, and the bonds and the interest thereon shall be payable solely fre~the revenues pledged thereto and no bonds shall constitute a debt of the Authori~y within the meaning of any consti~utional or statutory limitation nor shall the full faith, credi~ and taxing powers of the Authority be pledged thereto; and WHEREAS, under the Lease, the City is to pay to the Authori~y sufficient money each year to pay the principal of, premiu~, if any, and i~terest on the bonds issued to finance the Projec~, a~d City is to provide the cost of maintaining the ?roject in good repair, the ce:t ~f kee?i~g the Project properly insured, a~d any payments req~~rec for taxes and ar.y expenses i~currec by the Authority in connec~ion with t~e Project; and • • • • • • WHEREAS, by resolution adopted May 19, 1992, this Board authorized the issuance of such bonds and directed that an Official Statement be prepared to be used in the sale of the bonds; and WHEREAS, forms of the Lease and the Indenture and a form of the Official Statement, dated June 24, 1992, have been presented to this Board and are hereby ordered to be placed on file in the office of the Secretary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Authority"), as follows: Section 1. This Board hereby finds that the Project is an undertaking of the Authority authorized under Section 469.012, Subdivision 1(7). Section 2. This Board acknowledges, finds, determines and declares that it is in the best interests of the Authority to finance the Project by the acquisition and construction thereof by the Authority and lease thereof to the City since the Project will provide needed public facilities. Section 3. For the purpose of paying certain of the costs of the acquisition and construction of the Project, there 1s hereby authorized the issuance of Public Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1992A of the Authority in the aggregate principal amount of $2,640,000 (the "Bonds"). The Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form, shall be in such denominations, shall be payable on the dates and in the principal amounts and shall be payable from the sources and in the manner provided in the Indenture. The Bonds shall bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 7. This Board hereby authorizes and directs the Chairman to execute and the Secretary to attest under the corporate seal of the Authority the Indenture in the name and on behalf of the Authority·.·. and to deliver to the Trustee the Indenture, and does hereby authorize and direct the execution of the Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. All of the provisions of the Indenture, when executed as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated herein. The Indenture shall be substantially in the form on file in the office of the Secretary with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman shall determine to be necessary or appropriate, and the execution thereof by the Chairman shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. Section 4. The Chairman and the Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Lease in the -2- name and on behalf of the Authority. All of the provisions of the Lease, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if incorporated herein. The Lease shall be substantially in the form on file in·the office of the Secretary, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman shall determine to be necessary or appropriate, and the execution thereof by the Chairman shall be conclusive evidence of such determination. Section 5. No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement herein contained or contained in the Indenture, the Bonds or the Lease shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement of any member of this Board or any officer, agent or employee of the Authority in that person's individual capacity, and neither this Board nor any officer executing the Bonds shall be liable personally on the Bonds or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance thereof. Section 6. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized to do all acts and things required of them by or in connection with this resolution, the Indenture and the Lease for the full, punctual and complete performance of all the terms, covenants and agreements contained in the Bonds, the Indenture, the Lease and this resolution, including the execution and delivery of such closing certificates, arbitrage certifications and similar documents as may be required by bond counsel in connection with the issuance and delivery of the Bonds. Section 7. Pursuant to the resolution adopted May 19, 1992, Springsted Incorporated, as financial advisors to the Authority, have prepared a form of Terms of Proposal for the purpose of soliciting bids on the Bonds. Such form of Terms of Proposal is hereby ratified and cqnfirmed. The Authority has received and opened bids for the Bonds and has publicly considered the bids received. The bids received are summarized in the bidding summary attached hereto. It is hereby found and determined that the most favorable of said bids is that submitted by , of , , and associates (the "Purchaser"), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $ , plus accrued interest to the date of closing, the Bonds maturing in the following years to mature in the principal amounts and to bear interest at the designated rates set forth below opposite such years, respectively: -3- • • • • • • Principal Interest Principal Interest Maturit~ Amounts Rate Maturity Amounts Rate 1994 $40,000 2004 $125,000 1995 50,000 2005 135,000 1996 55,000 2006 150,000 1997 60,000 2007 165,000 1998 70,000 2008 175,000 1999 75,000 2009 190,000 2000 85,000 2010 210,000 2001 95,000 2011 225,000 2002 105,000 2012 245,000 2003 115,000 2013 270,000 Said offer is hereby accepted and the Chairman and the Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the Authority for the sale of the Bonds to the Purchaser. Section 8. The Official Statement prepared and distributed on behalf of the Authority by Springsted Incorporated is hereby approved and the determination of the Secretary that the Official Statement has been deemed final for purposes of SEC Rule 15c2-12 (b) (1) is hereby ratified and confirmed. The officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement and to deliver to the Purchaser within seven business days after the date of adoption of this resolution copies of the Official Statement in accordance with the Terms of Proposal, supplemented so as to contain the terms of the Bonds as set forth in this resolution and the reoffering and other information provided by the Purchaser for inclusion in the Official Statement. Section 9. Arbitrage Rebate. The Authority acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148(f) of the Code. The Authority covenant~ and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under said Section 148(f) (C) of the Code and no "gross proceeds" of the Bonds (other than amounts constituting a "bona fide debt service fund") arise during or after the expenditure of the original proceeds thereof. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Chairman and the Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute an Arbitrage and Rebate Certificate, in the form prepared by Bond Counsel. Section 10. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage . -4- Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, this 7th day of July, 1992. Chairman Attest: Executive Director -5- • • • .' • • Issuer: CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $2,640,000 Lease Revenue Bonds (Community Center Project), Series 1992A Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Governing Body: Board of Commissioners Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on July 7, 1992, at o'clock p.m., at the City Hall in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting, including: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,640,000 LEASE REVENUE BONDS (COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT), SERIES 1992A; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE AND PRESCRIBING THE FORM THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST AND A LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENT I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting rec6rding officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting ~ of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete' copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the bonds; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this _ day of July, 1992 . The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was • duly seconded by Commissioner and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following Commissioners voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • • • AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1992 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING HRA MEETING CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Council Recorder Kate Garwood PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS n. MINUTES A. B. .JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD TUESDAY. JUNE 16. 1992 CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY • .JUNE 16. 1992 m. CONSENT CALENDAR A. B. C. Clerk's License List 2nd Readin& of Ordinance Reguirin& Solid Waste Collection and Volume-Based Pricin& (Ordinance No. 25-92) Resolution No. 92-160. Approvin& Sale of Lease Reyenue Bonds by the HRA and Approvin& the Lease between the City and the HRA for the Community Center Improvements Page 1362 Page 1364 Page 1372 Page 1293 Page 1373 City Council Agenda . Tuesday, July 7, 1992 Page Two D. G.E. CAPITAL PROPOSED RECREATION FACILITY by G.E. Capital Fleet Services, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 14-92, Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 19.2 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for G .E. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-146, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 14-92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-147, Approving Site Plan for G.B. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility.. Location: North Edge of North Lake Anderson Lakes (Ordinance No. 14-92, Amending the· Office Zoning District; Resolution No. 92-146, Authorizing Summary and Publication; and Resolution No. 92-147, Site Plan Review.) E. Approve Plans and Specifications for Regional Center Road Improvements. I.C. 52-257 (Resolution No. 92-151) F. Reguest from Tom Meyers re2ardin2 Prairie View Park G. AlWrove Change Order and Alternatives to Community Center Addition Project H. Request for Aggraisal of Riley Creek Valley Outlot on Dorenkemger grogerty I. Resolution No. 92-139. Authorizing the Treasurer or Deputy Treasurer to make Electronic Fund Transfers for City of Eden Prairie J. Receive Agril 1992 Budget Status Regort K. 1st of Ordinance No. 26-92. Revising the City Code of the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota and Adogting The City Code of the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota <Revised .July. 1992) Pursuant to Authority Granted in Minnesota Statutes. Sections 415.02 and 415.021; and. Providing Penalties for the Violation Thereof L. Resolution No. 92-145. Recording Conformance with Develogers Agreement for Hinp's Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition • Page 1376. Page 1381 Page 1382 Page 138' Page 1392 Page 1393 Page 1395 Page 1396 Page 1398 • • • • City Council Agenda July 7, 1992 Page Three M. A ward Contract for Creek Knolls Cul-de-sac. Bluffs East 12th Addition. and Valley View Sidewalk. I.C. 52-194. I.C. 52-256. and I.C. 52-242 (Resolution No. 92-155) N. O. P. 100% Petition for Special Assessment of Sewer Connection Fees. I.C. 52-264 (Resolution No. 92-156) AImrove Plans for CSAH 18 Staee 2B Construction (north portion ofBloomin&ton Fern Bridee). I.C. 52-175 (Resolution No. 92-157) Final Plat AImroval of Eden Creek Oocated east of County Road 4. adjacent to Mere Drive) Resolution No. 92-158 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS A. B. TWIN CITY FEDERAL by Twin City Federal. ZQning District Amendment in the C-Reg-District on 1.06 acres and Site Plan Review on 1.06 acres. Location: Highway 169, north of McDonalds. (Ordinance No. 27-92 -Zoning District Amendment) BORUCKI ADDITION by Jim Borucki. Request for Preliminary Plat of .62 acres into 2 single family lots within the RI-13.5 Zoning District. Location: 6517 Rowland Road. (Resolution No. 92-150 -Preliminary Plat or Resolution No. 92-150 -Denial) C. RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS by Hustad Homes and Robert and James Brown. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 65 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 65 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to R1-13.5 on 5.7 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the Rl- 22 District on 5.0 acres; Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to RI-44 on 15.7 acres; Preliminary Plat of 65 acres into 34 single family lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way to bt known as Riverview Heights. Location: South of Riverview Road, east of Riverview Drive East. (Resolution No. 92-152 -PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 3-92-PUD-1-92 -PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-13.5, Zoning District Amendment on 5.0 acres within RI-22 District and Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-44 on 15.7 acres; and Resolution No. 92-153 -Preliminary Plat) D. VACATION 92-05 -Vacation of Street Rieht-of-Way and Draina&e and Utility Easements in part of Windfield Addition (Resolution No. 92-159) Page 1399 Page 1402 Page 1404 Page 1405 Page 1408 Page 1423 Page 1447 City Council Agenda July 7, 1992 Page Four V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 2nd Readin& of Ordinance No. 26-92. Reyisin& the City Code of the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota and Adoptin& The City Code of the City of Eden Prairie. Minnesota (Revised July. 1992) Pursuant to Authority Granted in Minnesota Statutes. Sections 415.02 and 415.21; and Providin& Penalties for the Violation Thereof VB. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request by Mark & Joey Omlie for Review of Variance 92-13 not approved by the Board of Adjustments & Appeals. The variances is to allow a deck to be constructed 85 feet from Bryant Lake's Ordinary Him Water Level B. Discussion on Water Tower DesiO C. Discussion with Mr. Bill Weir. member of the Hennepin County Park Board. representin& District 3 which includes Eden Prairie. re&ardin& Hennepin Parks Fundin& Priorities VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES A. Flyin& Cloud AiI:port Advisory Commission -Status of Flying Cloud Airport IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports t»f Councilmembers B. Report of City Mana&er 1. Presentation of 1991 Audit Report 2. Reschedule July 21. 1992 City Council Meetin& 3. Update! Action re&ardin& Purchase of CPT Buildin& 4. Update! Action re&ardin& Land Bankin& Pro&ram Page Page 1396 Page 1451 • Page 1459 Page 1460 • • • • City Council Agenda Tuesday, July 7, 1992 Page Five 5. Acquisition Services Agreement with Sterlin& Grou, ~ C. Report of DiRctor of Parks. Recreation & Natural ResoUrce 1. Review of Preliminary Gradin& Plan for Miller Park D. Report of Director of Plannin& E. Rmort or Director Of PubUc Works 1. Award Contract for Leona Road Street and \Vatmnain Improvements. I.C. 52-217 (Resolution No. 92-154) 2. TIF Cash Flow & Schedule (Continued from June 16, 1992) . 3. Tree Plantin& in the Ridrt-of-Way F. . Report of City Attorney G. Report of Finance Director XI. OTHER BUSINESS XU. ADJOURNMENT Page 1461 Page 1462 . Page 1464 • • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1992 6:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen and Patricia Pidcock PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Tim Bauer, Kenneth E. Clinton, Karen Norman, Jim Hawkins, Katherine Kardell, Doug Sandstad, . Mary Jane Wissner COUNCIL AND PLANNING COl\1MlSSION STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Senior Planner Michael D. Franzen I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER ll. Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. All members were present. DISCUSSION OF CITY'S CURRENT MISSION STATEMENT OR PHILOSOPHY OF GROWTH Planning Commission Chairman Sandstad stated that the Commission was looking for Council direction regarding its role as the community matured. Commissioners listed a variety of projects in which, with Council's permission, they would like to assume a more pro-active role, including: -Creation of greater housing diversity in the community, -Development of Downtown Eden Prairie -Protection of the Minnesota River Bluffs and River Valley -Transportation, including circulation within the City -Active use of open space in the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area -Detailed study of remaining large land areas such as was done with the Southwest Area, -Purchasing parcels for various uses in the future The Council and Commission discussed different methods for reaching these goals, including offering incentives to developers for provision of more affordable housing within a new development, land banking of parcels now in order to provide for a certain land use in the future, and use of existing code provisions and potential code amendments. Councilmembers concurred that the City should not compromise on issues of quality with respect to incentives offered. Based on discussions with developers, the City's standards • were considered tough; however, it appeared developers did not mind tough regulations, when it was clear City staff was willing to help them through the process, avoiding confrontational situations. Enger was commended for his leadership in this area. Discussion ensued regarding the changing needs of the City with respect to the function of the Commission. The nature of the Commission was seen as in-transition between a "development proposal review" group during the 1980s to an "overall study and planning group" in the 1990s. Councilmembers expressed confidence in the Commissioners to make recommendations in these areas which would be meaningful and important to Eden Prairie's future. They were also gratified by the willingness of the Commission to take on difficult issues and to assume a pro-active stance. Councilmembers concurred that the Commission's proposal fit well within the Total Quality Management program of City Staff being led by Jullie. It was suggested that Staff assist the Commission in developing a process to forward concerns, proposals, and studies to the Council on a regular basis. One suggestion was that the Planning Commission begin a series of meetings with the other boards and commissions to review the City's future. For example, the planning of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and the preservation of the Minnesota River Bluff area would be items to be reviewed jointly with the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. Development of the Downtown Area was discussed in greater detail. Councilmembers • concurred that a major focus of the immediate future would be development of the area between the Wal-mart store on the east and the CPT building on the west, bounding the future Downtown Area. The consensus was that the development plans for this area would be very important to the City in the immediate future. Council members commended the Commissioners for their work on behalf of the City and thanked them for their interest in a proactive role in the City in the future. ill. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1992 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCllMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin ~ Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. All members were present. SALE OF $1,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION PARK BONDS (Resolution No. 92-142), AND $1,940,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STATE-AID BONDS (Resolution No. 92-143) &ave MacGillivray of Springsted, Inc., presented the tabulation of bids for the sale of two issues of bonds. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 92-142 for $1,100,000 General Obligation Park Bonds, Series 1992A, to Cronin and Company, Inc.; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-143 for $1,940,000 General Obligation State-Aid Road Bonds, Series 1992B, to Cronin and Company, Inc. Motion carried unanimously, I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added Item X.A.2., Heritaee Road and Item X.A.3., Certainteed Corporation. Harris added Item X.A.4., Leaeue of Minnesota Cities Board Appointment. Anderson added Item X.A.5., Establishment of Trail Alone Future Lieht Rail Corridor. Jullie added Item Vn.D. Set Date to Hear an Appeal from the Decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for Mr. and Mrs. Omlie. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. n. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1992 • MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the June 2, 1992 meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 2 June 16, 1992 m. CONSENT CALENDAR • A. Clerk's License List B. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 17-92. amending Chapter 2. "Administration and General Government". and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-131. authorizing Summary for Publication C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 18-92. amending Chapter 7. "Traffic Regulations". and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-132. authorizing Summary for Publication. D. 2nd Readin2 of Ordinance No. 19-92. amendin2 Chapter 10. "Construction Permits and Regulations". and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-133. authorizing Summary for Publication E. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 20-92. amending Chapter 5. "Other Business Regulations and Licensing. and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-134. authorizing Summary for Publication F. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 23-92. Rental Housing Code. and Adoption of Resolution No. 92- 135. authorizing Summary for Publication G. EDEN PRAIRIE FORD PARKING EXPANSION by Denwal Management. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 15-92, Rezoning from Rural to C-Reg-Ser on 1.5 acres, Approval of Developer's Agreement for Eden Prairie Ford Parking Expansion; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-129, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 15-92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption. Resolution No. 92-128, Approving Site Plan for Eden Prairie Ford Parking Expansion. Locati North of Plaza Drive, east of Prairie View Center (Ordinance No. 15-92 -Rezoning to C-Reg-Ser; Resolution No. 92-129 -Authorizing Summary and Publication; and Resolution No. 92-128 -Site Plan Review.) H. EDEN CREEK by I.M.S. Development Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 21-92, Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 6.6 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Eden Creek; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-130, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 21-92 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: 6615-6625 Eden Prairie Road. (Ordinance No. 21-92 -Rezoning to Rl-13.5; and Resolution No. 92-130 -Authorizing Summary and Publication.) I. ADOPTION OF 1991 FINAL BUDGET (Resolution No. 92-141) J. 1st Reading of Ordinance Requiring Solid Waste Collection and Volume-Based Pricing (Ordinance No. 25-92) K. Approval of Agreement for the Quail Ridge Apartment Project L. Authorize Feasibility Study of Indian Road Bridge Replacement. I.C. 52-263 (Resolution No. 92- 137) M. Final Plat Approval of Shores of Mitchell Lake (located south of TH 5 and west of Shoreline of Mitchell Lake) Resolution No. 92-138 • City Council Minutes 3 June 16, 1992 • N. Award Contract for Dell Road Improvements. I.C. 52-160 (Resolution No. 92-118) Continued from June 2, 1992 O. Endorsement of Deer Control Fencine at Flyine Cloud Airport P. CSAH 4 Trail Budeet Amendment Q. Resolution No. 92-144 Authorizine the Combination of Certain Funds and a $2.000.000 "Bridee Loan" MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve items A -Q on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV • PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS • • A. Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Braxton Drive. I.C. 52-189 (Resolution No. 92-56) Continued from April 7, April 21, 1992, May 5, May 19, 1992, and June 2, 1992 Dietz explained that ownership issues had been settled, and that Centex Homes would be developing a portion of the land over the next several months. Centex agreed with the need for the project and the proposed phasing over the next two years. There were no comments from members of the audience. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to: 1) Close the public hearing; and, 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-56 to Order I.e. 52-189 for Improvements on Braxton Drive with staff recommendations for two phases. Motion carried unanimously. B. DORENKEMPER EST A TES by Alex Dorenkemper. Request for Preliminary Plat of 46 acres into 4 lots, PUD Concept on 46 acres and PUD District Review on 46 acres with waivers for lot size. Location 18925 Pioneer Trail. (Resolution No. 92-127 -PUD Concept; Ordinance No. 24-92-PUD-4- 92 -PUD District Review; and Resolution No. 92-126 -Preliminary Plat) Alex Dorenkemper introduced the development and stated he agreed with all recommendations of the staff. Enger reported that the Planning Commission discussed this item at two meetings and recommended approval at its May 26th meeting; Lambert reported that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval at its June 15th meeting. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to: 1) Close the public hearing; City Council Minutes 4 June 16, 1992 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-127 to approve the PUD Concept; • 3) Approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 24-92-PUD-4-92 for PUD District Review; 4) Adopt Resolution No. 92-126 to approve the Preliminary Plat; and 5) Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. C. VA CA TION 92-04 -Draina2;e and Utility Easement on Lot 6 and 7, Block 1. Welter Purgatory Acres 6th Addition (Resolution No. 92-140) Due to a proposed new lot line, vacation of an existing utility and drainage easement was requested, with new easements to be dedicated along the new lot line. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to: 1) Close the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 92-140 to vacate the drainage and utility easements. • Motion carried unanimously, V,PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Anderson, Harris, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voted "Aye." VI.ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS vn.PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Strathy's regarding Conservancy Easement (Continued from June 2, 1992) Mr. & Mrs. Strathy of 11787 Welter's Way requested Council approvai to encroach within the scenic easement in their backyard, located adjacent to Purgatory Creek. Lambert reported that, at its meeting June 1st, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval of the relocation of the retaining wall, allowing some encroachment into the scenic easement. However, the Commission further recommended that the no change be allowed to the woodlands or understory areas within the scenic easement. Council members raised questions regarding how many trees and how much understory growth w. proposed for removal, where new plantings would be located, how high the retaining wall would what materials would be used to construct the retaining wall, and whether alternative solutions had been considered. City Council Minutes 5 June 16, 1992 • • Joni and Kevin Strathy responded that the encroachment would be approximately twelve feet into the easement, causing removal of seven or eight trees and understory vegetation. The Strathys were willing to replace all of the trees and the understory growth in accordance with Staff recommendations. If their proposal were approved, the plantings would be installed in the same location, but three feet lower in elevation. Their preference would be to use the natural grade instead of a retaining wall; however, ifnecessary, a two-to-three foot boulder retaining wall was proposed. Other alternatives had been considered, but appeared to have more severe impact on the easement area. For example, if sod was removed in the back yard and the lot was raised, it would cause the construction of a seven-to- eight foot high retaining wall. Anderson said the City had planned this conservancy area carefully with the intent of providing a natural area along both sides of the creek. Those who purchased homes along the creek should have done so with knowledge of the easement conditions and City requirements regarding its use and restrictions. Mr. and Mrs. Strathy admitted to knowledge of the easement and conditions at the time of purchase. Anderson was concerned that allowing this encroachment would start a dangerous precedent that would compromise the integrity of the conservancy area. After further discussion of their request, and agreement by Mr. and Mrs. Strathy to replace trees and understory vegetation with native plant materials in accordance with the recommmendations of the City Forester, the majority of the Council agreed that the intent of the easement conditions could be met. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the request of Mr. and Mrs. Strathy, subject to the following conditions: 1) All trees and understory vegetation removed by the change in grade shall be replaced; and 2) Plant materials chosen for replacement and the manner of installation of such plant materials shall be as approved by the City Forester. Motion carried on a vote of 4 - 1 -0 (Anderson voted against). B. Request for Use of Motorized Vehicles on Transportation Trails In response to the request of a resident, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission considered the possibility of motorized vehicle use on transportation trails in the City. The resident had made the request on behalf of his daughter, who is paralyzed. Lambert reported that, at its June 1st meeting, the Commission recommended that all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) not be allowed on transportation trails. Instead, certain revisions should be made to the City Code to apply to this situation. Council members expressed concern for the potential endangerment of other trail users in the event ATVs were allowed on the trails. They also considered ways in which the resident's request could be accommodated. A maximum speed limit of 15 mph was discussed. It was suggested that a certificate be issued from the City to allow A TV use under a special and specific set of circumstances. • Council members agreed that random use of ATVs on the transportation trails was not desirable. City Council Minutes 6 June 16, 1992 MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to: • 1) Deny the request to use all-terrain vehicles on the City's transportation trails; and, 2) Staff be directed to prepare revisions to the portion of the City Code related to this issue as recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, with the inclusion of a process for issuance of a certificate for specific purposes. Motion carried unanimously. C. Sue Nathan. Minne2asco. Announcin2 Community Ener2Y Services Pr02ram. Sue Nathan introduced Minnegasco programs now available in the City. The programs were designed to help people reduce their energy bills, whether homeowners or renters. Assistance was available through a variety of services, including inventory of current systems, review of contractors' bids and work, education on how to reduce daily energy usage, etc. Ms. Nathan stated that the programs were currently operating successfully in 18 other communities. The Council supported the service and thanked Ms. Nathan for introducing the program in Eden Prairie. D. Set Date to Hear an Appeal from the Decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for Mr. and Mrs. Omlie MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to set July 7th to hear an appeal from the deciS. of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments from Mr. and Mrs. Omlie. Motion carried unanimous vm. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES A. Report from Technolo2Y Committee Gary Therkelson, Co-Chair of the Quality Management Technology Committee, presented the findings and recommendations of the Committee for Council consideration. The report focused on ten basic recommendations, the most important of which was the creation of a support staff position dedicated to assisting departments with data processing needs. Council members commended the Technology Committee, stating that the report was a well-prepared and important piece of work on behalf of the City and that they were firmly in support of the recommendations outlined. It was noted that this type of effort was evidence of the positive impact of Jullie's work with Total Quality Management in the City. The Council endorsed the findings and recommendations of the report and directed the staff to continue to progress with further study as outlined in the report. IX. APPOINTMENTS • City Council Minutes 7 June 16, 1992 ex. REPORTS OF OFFICERS e A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. City Mana2er's Mid-Year Review MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to accept the memorandum regarding the City Manager's Mid-Year Review as a summary of the closed meeting discussion held June 2, 1992. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Herita2e Road Update Pidcock said she had been contacted by residents from that area who wanted an understanding of what was happening on the project from the Minnesota Highway Department. Jullie reported that he was in the process of gathering information at this time and would be corresponding with the residents shortly. 3. Certainteed Meetin2 with Minnesota Pollution Control A2ency Pidcock reported there was a hearing scheduled by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for Tuesday, June 23rd, to consider the odor complaints against Certain teed and suggested that the City make its feelings known at this meeting. After discussion, Council directed Staff to prepare a letter regarding the City's experiences and concerns about the issue and to send a staff member to the meeting. Enger stated that the Planning Department had notified those people who had registered complaints with the City about the meeting. 4. Appointment to Board of Directors of the Lealrne of Minnesota Cities Harris announced that Pidcock had accepted appointment to a three-year term as a Director on the Board of the League of Minnesota Cities. The appointment would allow for greater representation of Eden Prairie in League lobbying efforts and policy positions. 5. Trail Construction within Hennepin County Li2ht Rail Transit Corridor Anderson expressed frustration at the lack of action on commitments by Suburban Hennepin Regional Parks District to construct a trail within the Light Rail Transit Corridor. Council members concurred that it was disappointing that the decision had been delayed on more than one occasion and that no decisive answers could be given to residents. Anderson agreed to work with Staff to make Hennepin County more aware of the priority for construction of the trail. B. Report of City Mana2er e C. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resources D. Report of Director of Plannin2 1870 City Council Minutes 8 June 16, 1992 E. Report of Director of Public Works • 1. TIF Project List Report (Continued from June 2, 1992) Dietz asked that this item be continued to July 7th in order to include information from the consultant preparing a land banking analysis in the Downtown area. Councilmembers concurred this would be important information to their decisions and continued the item to July 7th . . 2. Award Contract for Traffic Sienals at TH 169/212 and Leona Road/Eden Road. I.C. 52-223 <Resolution No. 92-136) Bids for this project were opened during the week of June 8th. Based on the tabulation of bids, Staff recommended award of the bid to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 92-136 to Award the Contract to Ridgedale Electric for I.C. 52-223. Motion carried unanimously. F. Report of City Attorney G. Report of Finance Director XI.OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT • MOTION TO ADJOURN: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 9: 15 p.m. • I~ J • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST July 7, 1992 CONTRACTOR (MUL TI-FM1~LY & Cm1M.) The Carpenters Contracting, Inc. Dennis Dirlam E.C.I. Building Contractors Indulge Yourself, Inc. Marathon Installers, Inc. Neisen Construction, Inc. Oakwood Builders Scott Scherer Contracting Shingobee Builders, Inc. PLUMBING Burgess Plumbing & Heating Doran Enterprises Pl umm, Inc. GAS FITTER Anderson Mechanical, Inc. Doran Enterprises HEATI~G ~ VENTILATING Associated Heating, Inc . Realistic Heating & Cooling, Inc, S & W Heating & Air Conditioning These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for o;nsJ:it y . Pa t Sol ie> Licensing • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-160 RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT AND CERTAIN REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie (the "Authority") proposes to undertake a project under the Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "Act"), with respect to certain property located within the City for the purpose of providing necessary public facilities, including, without limitation, the addition of an ice arena to the City's Community Center (the "Project"), and to lease and agree to sell the Project to the City pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Lease-Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1992 (the "Lease"), between the Authority, as lessor, and the City, as lessee; and WHEREAS, the Authority has the power to lease and agree to sell the Project to the City and enter into the Lease pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.035 and Section 471.64, Subdivision 1 and City has the power to lease and agree to purchase the Project and enter into the Lease pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.64, Subdivision 1 and Section 465.71; and WHEREAS, the Authority proposes to issue its Lease Revenue Bonds (Community Center Project), Series 1992A, in the aggregate principal amount of $2,640,000 (the "Series 1992 Bonds"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.034 and 469.035, and a Trust Indenture, dated as of August 1, 1992 (the "1 denture"), between the Authority and ~I)S rH'!.i r() eli' v: n1tf'/J , in , Minnesota; the Series 1992 Bonds are payable olely from payments to be made by the City pursuant to the Lease and from the net proceeds of any insurance claims or condemnation awards made with respect to the Project; and WHEREAS, the Authority has offered the Series 1992 Bonds for sale by means of an Official Statement, dated June 24, 1992 (the "Official Statement"); and • • • WHEREAS, a form of the Lease and a form of the Official Statement have been presented to this Council and are hereby ordered to be placed on file in the office of the City Finance Director/Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: 1. Approyal and Execution of I,ease. The Lease, substantially·in the form presented to this Council, is hereby approved. The Mayor and the. City Manager (or, in the event of their absence or disability, the acting Mayor or the acting City Manager, respectively) are hereby authorized and directed to execute and del~ver th~ Lease in the. name of and on behalf of the City. All of thepr.ovisions of the Lease, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as full~ and to the same extent as if incorporated herein. The Lease shall be substantially in the form now on file in the office of the City Finance Director/Clerk, with such necessary and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as the City Attorney shall determine to be necessary or appropriate, and the execution thereof by the City Attorney shall be conclusive evidence of such determinations. 2. Approyal of Official Starement. The Official Statement is approved and it is hereby determined that the information contained therein regarding the City is accurate and complete. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement insofar as ~~ contains information describing the City and the Lease. 3. Execution of Other Documents. Officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such other certificates and documents as maybe necessary and appropriate to effectuate the transactions contemplated by the Lease and the Official Statement. 4. Arbitrage Rebate. The City acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148 (f) of the .. Code. The City covenants and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under said Section 148(f} (C) of the Code and no "gross proceeds" of the Bonds (other than amounts constituting a "bona fide debt service fund", arise during or after the expenditure of the original proceeds thereof. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute an Arbitrage and Rebate Certificate, in the form prepared by Bond Counsel. Adopted this 7th day July, 1992. • Mayor Atte'st: City Finance Director/Clerk (SEAL) • • • G.E. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 14-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITHIN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the zoning of the land be amended within the Office Zoning District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the zoning of the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Office Zoning District, and the legal description of land in such District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and is amended accordingly. ~ SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the WEntire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of July 7, 1992, entered into between G.E. Capital Fleet Services, Inc. a Corporation,_and the City of Eden Prairie, and that certain Owner's Supplement to Developer's Agreement, between Gelco Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated as of July 7, 1992, which Agreement and Owner's Supplement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of May, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of July, 1992. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor .UBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of G.E. PROPOSED RECREATIONAL FACILITY • Exhibit A Legal Description Part of Government Lot 6, Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • • G.E. CAPITAL PROPOSED RECREATIONAL FACILITY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 14-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN THE OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance amends the zoning of land within the Office Zoning District on the North Edge of North Lake Anderson Lakes, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property . • ffective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk lsi Douglas B. Tenpas Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ___ day of ____ , 199 __ . (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) • G.E. CAPITAL PROPOSED RECREATIONAL FACILITY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-146 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 14-92 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY • WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 14-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of May, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 14-92, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person duriA regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be postP in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 14-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on July 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • G.E. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-147 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPRO V AL FOR G.E. CAPITAL PROPOSED RECREATIONAL FACILITY FOR G.E. CAPITAL FLEET SERVICE, INC. WHEREAS, G.E. Capital Fleet Service, Inc. has applied for site plan approval of G.E. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility on 19.2 acres for construction of a recreational facility (0.4 acres) on property located North Edge of North Lake Anderson Lakes, to be zoned Office by Ordinance No. 14-92 adopted by the City Council on May 19, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 27, 1992 Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its May 19, 1992 meeting; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to G.E. Capital Fleet Service for G. E. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility for construction of a 0.4 acre recreational facility, based on plans dated May 14, 1992, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement between G.E. Fleet Services, Inc., a Corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated July 7, 1992, for G.E. Capital Proposed Recreational Facility. ADOPTED by the City Council on July 7, 1992. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ,'~.r::'(.,./I • 1 <.J .. ....,. , • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-151 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer, through BRW, Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C.52-257 -Regional Center Road Improvements and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., August 17, 1992, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, August 17, 1992, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 137/ • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources~ DATE: June 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Request from Tom Myers Regarding Prairie View School Park REQUEST: During the expansion construction of Prairie View School, the School District requires a staging area for the contractor. Due to limitations of the site, the only locations available would be either the parking lot or part of the park site. Existing parking on the site is inadequate; therefore, limiting further parking would cause major problems with the neighborhood. Tom Myers has requested the City allow using the hockey rink as a staging area during the next year's construction, and would like to relocate the rink and skating area after construction. BACKGROUND: • The expansion of Prairie View School will require elimination of the two tennis courts that were actually constructed on school property with City funds. The School District has agreed to replace those two courts at CMS when the six courts at CMS are removed during that construction project. Eight courts will be replaced in that location. The expansion of the school building will bring the new addition adjacent to the hockey rink; therefore, the hockey rink provides a perfect location for a staging area. The School District would not want the hockey rink located immediately adjacent to the new addition once the addition is completed, and, therefore, have also requested that the hockey rink be relocated. Obviously, if the hockey rink is relocated, the warming house/park shelter and skating rink would also have to be relocated. • The School District is presently considering acquisition of some additional property to the south of Prairie View School. If that acquisition does take place the hockey rink, park shelter and skating rink could be relocated to that portion of the site and playground would be developed in the existing location of the hockey rink. If the acquisition of the property to the south does not take place the City would request that the School District reimburse the City for the cost of relocating those facilities to another site, preferably in that same quadrant of the community - most likely Hidden Ponds Park. City staff have informed the Hockey Association that the City Council will be considering the School District's request for eliminating the hockey rink during the winter of 1992/93. myers/bob • EDEN PRAIRI~SCHOOLS. J'-' ,.' District 272 Office of the Principal Prairie View Elementary School Telephone: (612) 934-4770 JupelB,1992 Mr. Robert Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Eden Prairie City Hall 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Bob: Thank you for taking the time during the last month to visit the Prairie View School and park site. On those two occasions, I shared with you the concern around space and safety for adults as well as student population as we enter our 16 month construction and remodeling program at Prairie View. Based on those concerns and also the parking limitations on a rather small physical site, we will • be needing to take a look at the ice rink and playground areas on the Prairie View site for construction storage of equipment and materials, as well as expanded parking for automobiles. < I:' " ;1 As I continue to work ~th the architect and contractors, I will keep you posted of our needs with this area. I appreciate your help and cooperation as we look at expanding Prairie View to meet our increased student growth. Sincerely, /) ./'1 I;' I >~ _ ;;;::~ye~~'~} - Principal Prairie View Elementary School TM:ec Prairie View Elementary School 17255 Peterborg Road EdenPrairie.MN55346-3544 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ • Cunlngham Suite 100 210 North Second St. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55401 612-332-0224 FAX: 332-6132 III Architects PA e T ______ _ e • TO: FROM: PROJECT: SUBJECT: DATE: cc: Tom Myers David Hyde MEMORANDUM Prairie View Elementary (9186) Grounds and Site Use During Construction June 15, 1992 File For the safety of students, efficiency of constructio~ and maximum use of the existing site during construction, several items will need to occur on a temporary basis: 1. Due to construction, 30% of the existing parking will be eliminated. This will require the staff to park on Peterborg Road. Additional parking, on a temporary basis, will be established on the ice skating rink. The surfacing at the rink will be six (6") inch crushed stone. It must be noted that this is only a temporary resolution to the parking problem. 2. An additional six feet of bituminous will be required in front of the construction site on the north end of the school. This additional bituminous will allow the buses to pass in front of the construction. This will enable the children to be dropped off as close to the building as possible. The additional bitiminous will give the children an extra layer of safety. That will also allow the existing bus drop off system to remain in tact. 3. The ice hockey rink will be a perfect site for construction staging. Using the rink will enable us to limit the amount of construction staging on the existing parking area and maximize the use of the remaining parking . P:\91 \86\OOM061592.DOC 13(;4 • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~ DATE: June 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Change Orders and Alternatives to Community Center Addition Project As City staff have evaluated alternates to the Community Center addition bid and reviewed detailed decisions on the project, there are a number of changes that we request approved at this time. Attached to this memo is a letter from Del Erickson summarizing these various changes. Several of these changes require some comment and explanation. G-3: Revise Brick Mortar Color -It was an oversight on the architect's part to not require this as part of the original bid. He thought the existing mortar was a natural color; however, there is a slight coloring required to match the existing mortar. G-4: Revise High School Locker Room to Reduce Cost of Alternate -The School District requested several changes in their original plan in order to reduce the cost. The School District has reviewed this revision and approved the change order. G-S: Sound System -We have decided to recommend accepting alternate #1, which is deducting the sound system for the new arena. Clarity Sound Systems has submitted an alternate quote to provide a similar sound system utilizing more of the existing equipment and making several recommended improvements to the sound system and existing rink for a total cost of $7,876. Our electrical engineer on the project has reviewed their quote and agrees that their proposal would provide a similar quality of sound and equipment at a savings of nearly $5,000. Omit the Heat Reclaim Coil: The existing heat reclaim coil that uses heat generated from the condensers to heat the pool water, heat the existing arena, heat the domestic water, and heat the floor and snow melt pit basically utilize all the available heat. Adding an additional heat reclaim coil would be a waste of money, and would draw heat away from the major cost saving factor of heating the pool water. Change Orders June 30, 1992 Page 2 '--' . ; . ~, .. ". M-5: Revise Evap Condenser to a Larger Unit which is available for same cost: The company that bid on the evap condenser has a unit available that is already constructed which is considerably larger that the one specified for this building. The company is willing to provide that unit at the :same cost as the one designed for the building. This larger condenser allows the condenser to operate without water to a higher outside temperature. This will offer an energy savings of approximately $6,000 per year. There are several additional decisions to be made regarding the type of block we intend to use in order to provide the best acoustical space within our proposed budget. These recommendations will be forwarded as soon as possible. BL:mdd· changes/bob : ... - l'. • • • • • • CHANGE ORDER AlA DOCUMENT C701 Distribution to: OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER ~ o D D PROJECT: Eden Prairie Corrm. Ctr. Addition CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: ONE ( 1 ) (name, address) 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN TO (Contractor): r-;hingobee Builders Inc. ~ INITIATION DATE: June 30, 1992 ARCH ITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9117 279 Medina Street North CONTRACT FOR: Loretto, MN 55357 L -.J CONTRACT DATE: You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: C.A.No. Item E-l Revise telephone and service conduit to be PVC with PVC coated steel bends. Revise incoming telephone to be relocated cable direct in ground. See Ridgedale Electric letter of June 15, 1992 G-3 Revise brick mortar color to be tinted to match existing. G-4 Revise Alternate No. 1 (HS locker Room) which deletes 13 lockers, bench, and ventilation per sketch dated 6-3-92 ($5,700.00) and revise duct work per June 4, 1992 letter ($1,100.00) . G-5 Accept Alternate No.1, H.S. Locker rooms Accept Alternate No. 10 , Sound System Accept Alternate No. 12 Heat Reclaim Net Total Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. S( Construction May 21, 1992 Amount 6,586.47) 3,500.00 (6,800.00) 166,348.00 (12,450.00) (8,200.00) $ 135,811. 53 Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (G/.J~r/a.Mef=/JIf/1Nr/tl/l'/ric/44() was ... , ....................... $ :--Jet change by previously authorized Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ The (Contract Sum) (C/L/a/c/rIcr/f/C/t/Ak/.i/rIuH t#t) prior to this Change Order was .......... $ The (Contract Sum) (GJ<Ir/.rltMcf /viakYrr/.Jr/J/C/qsfJ will be (increased) (~/:.rIe;.'If/dA (t/r/cM~if/r1J by this Change Order ......................................................... $ The new (Contract Sum) (CltfaNrrt¢rfdftj/lpNrfu!rI f-Nt) including this Change Order will be ... $ The Contract Time will be (iif¢¢<fsM)/(dNrf!MeIJ/ (unchanged) by 1,898,200.00 o 1,898,200.00 135,811.53 2,034,01l.53 ( none) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is December 18, 1992 Authorized: Delano Erickson Architects Shingobee Builders Inc. City of Eden Prairie ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR OWNER Address Address Address By ______________________ ___ DATE DATE AlA DOCUMENT G701 CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDI 10 AIA®' © 1978 THE A.\lERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G701 -1978 J0b'7 CHANGE ORDER AlA DOCUMENT G701 Distribution to: OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER o o ~ o PROJECT: Eden Prairie Comm. Ctr. Addition (name, address) 16700 Valley View Road CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: ONE ( 1 ) Eden Prairie, MN TO (Contractor): r-;hingobee Builders Inc. ~ INITIATION DATE: June 30, 1992 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9117 279 Medina Street North CONTRACT FOR: Loretto, MN 55357 L --1 CONTRACT DATE: You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: C.A.No. Item E-l G-3 Revise··telephone and service conduit to be PVC with PVC coated steel bends. Revise incoming telephone to be relocated cable direct in ground. See Ridgedale Electric letter of June 15, 1992 Revise brick mortar color to be tinted to match existing. G-4 Revise Alternate No.1 (HS Locker Room) which deletes 13 lockers, bench, and ventilation per sketch dated 6-3-92 ($5,700.00) and revise duct work per June 4, 1992 letter ($1,100.00). G-5 Accept Alternate No.1, H.S. Locker rooms Accept Alternate No. 10 , Sound System Accept Alternate No. 12 Heat· Reclaim Net Total Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Construction May 21, 1992 Amount S( 6,586.47) 3,500.00 (6,800.00) 166,348.00 (12,450.00)" (8,200.00) $ 135,811.53 Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (G/JAr/aMe,k/lIMNr/l/jfr/Cf.r/J</t) was ......................... " $ Net change by previously authorized Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ The (Contract Sum) (C/JaNrr'cif/d/t/A#i/rIuH tP/t) prior to this Change Order was .......... $ The (Contract Sum) (Gl/c/r/.rltM1/viakrrrNr/J/C/c/s/J will be (increased) (c}kUe/J.lddA (Jr/cJ.-W~if/CiJ by this Change Order ......................................................... $ The new (Contract Sum) (qtfa/</rrt¢</C¥tf\/l'/.ifrfttrl f.Nt) including this Change Order will be ... $ 1,898,200.00 o 1,898,200.00 , . '. 135,811.53 2,034,011.53 • • The Contract Time will be (irjcl¢<fsM)/ (d/4rfoMe/J/ (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is ( none) Days. Delano Erickson Architects Shingobee Builders Inc. ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR Address Address December 18, 1992 Authorized: City of Eden Prairie OWNER Address • By ______________________ ___ DATE DATE AlA DOCUMENT G701 CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDITIO AIA®' © 1971l THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G701 -1978 J3DD • • • CHANGE ORDER AlA DOCUMENT G701 Distribution to: OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER o ~ o o PROJECT: Eden Prairie Comm. Ctr. Addition CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: ONE ( 1 ) (name, address) 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN TO (Contractor): r-Shingobee Builders Inc. 1 279 Medina Street North INITIATION DATE: June 30, 1992 ARCH ITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9117 CONTRACT FOR: Construction Loretto, MN 55357 L --.J CONTRACT DATE: i'1ay 21, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: C.A.No~ Item E-l G-3 Revise telephone and service conduit to be PVC with PVC coated steel bends .. Revise incoming telephone to be relocated cable direct in ground. See Ridgedale Electric letter of June 15, 1992 'Revise brick mortar color to be tinted to match existing. G-4 Revise Alternate No. 1 (HS Locker Room) which deletes 13 lockers, bench, and ventilation per sketch dated 6-3-92 ($5,700.00) and revise duct work per June 4, 1992 letter ($1,100.00) . G-5 Accept Alternate No.1, H.S. Locker rooms Accept Alternate No. 10 , Sound System Accept Alternate No. 12 Heat Reclaim Net Total Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. $( Amount 6,586.47) 3,500.00 (6,800.00) 166,348.00 (12,450.00) (8,200.00) $ 135 ,811.~3 Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (GUr/aMeI=fJIMNrfn/.l'/riC/.¢<jt) was ........................... $ 1,898,200.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $ ° The (Contract Sum) (C/JaI#r/f/QIf/;I#,i/rUrl tp/t) prior to this Change Order was .......... $ l, 898,200.00 The (Contract Sum) (GJclrir/tMri !4akIrrlJrA/(jqs'/J will be (increased) (C/2UeMddJ (Jrldw~iclriJ by this Change Order ......................................................... $ 135,811.53 2,034,011.53 The new (Contract Sum) (qtfaNryt.¢rfrftfAJrl.ifrtu!r/ f-Nt) including this Change Order will be ... $ The Contract Time will be (irjc!¢cfsM)/ (c¥¢r/44efJ/ (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Delano Erickson Architects Shingobee Builders Inc. ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR t\dd r(,55 AlA DOCUMENT G701 CHANGE OIWER • N AIA'~· (~) 19711 THE AMERICAN INSTITlJTr ()r' ,'.~ClIIrr:CT~.I71S ~r\v \()I~K .\\T. N.W .. W\~H'~:('r()" I) C cO(l()(, /~lCj ( none) Days. December 18, 1992 Authorized: City of Eden Prairie OWNI:R Address lIy ___________ ----' DATE G701 -1978 cJe DEL~NO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS ~ ~~ June 24, 1992 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS MN 5. 612 -544- Bob Lambert City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: EPee Addition Corrrn. No. 9117 Dear Bob: The following changes have been reviewed by us and are recommended to be included ih a,change order: E-l Revise conduit for electric servlce. M-2 Revise layout of gas line and meter location. This will omit charge from gas company of approximately $15,000 for new gas service location. G-3 Revise brick morbar color. This is required to match existing. G-4 Revise H.S. locker room to reduce cost of alternate. G-5 Accept Alternate No.1. b) Omit sound system (new arena) , this will be replaced by system you will purchase from C1airty. We have reviewed and feel the system will workable. c) Omit heat reclaim coil. We have analyzed the heat available and it's use as follows: deduct ($ 6,586.47) estimated even add $ 3,500.00 deduct ($ 6,800.00) ";$166,348 .00 deduct ($12,450.00) ,.,:_ ... 1\ " ..... ' deduct ($ 8,200.00) Total available (average) Reclaim systems use: 1,500,000 BTUH Under floor heat & snow melt Existing arena heating Domestic water Pool heating Total J~C)O 650,000 BTUH 250,000 150,000 350,000 1,400,000 RllJH • • • • • 130b Latnber t June 24, 1992 Page 2 The new arena coil would not have enough available he.1t to lise if the pool heating is done. The energy cost savings of the pool water coil is approximately $11,000.00 annual compared to the arena air coil of $4,000.00 annual. We recommend the pool coil since this is a better pay back and mo~consistent use of the available energy. M-6 Revise evap. condenser to larger unit which is available for same cost. We have analyzed the energy savings of this unit to-be -6,000 to 7,000 annual less $600 additional energy for larger pump ~ . Other changes 'which are presently being reviewed a) Revise 5 year roof guarantee to 10 year b) Substitute dehumidifier (withdrawn) c) Omit relocation of existing sound system to be by Clarity . d) Substitute 8 x 8 block on exterior e) Omit score on interior rock face f) Substitute std wt for It wt on interior g) Add acoustic deck est. add $2,000.00 are the following: $ 3,000.00 est. $ 1,500.00 add $15,000.00 deduct($ 900.00) deduct($ 5,000.00) est. $ 3,000.00 We are proceeding on the basis of your verbal approval of items 1 thru 6 and will provide 'additional inforrmtion on the later ,items as we obtain it. Please call with any questions. Very truly yours, DEIANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS ~~----------------~ Del Erickson, ALA DDE/se • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource~ DATE: June 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Request for Appraisal of Riley Creek Valley Outlot on Dorenkemper Property At the June 16th meeting, the Eden Prairie City Council approved the Dorenkemper Subdivision, and also approved acquiring an outlot for the future creek valley trail to be purchased based on an appraised value. City staff would. like authorization to obtain an appraisal of that outlot in order to make an offer to Mr. Dorenkemper for that property. BL:mdd Riley/bob /39') • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-139 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER OR DEPUTY TREASURER TO MAKE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS FOR CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BE IT RESOLVED;. by the Ci ty Counci 1 of the Ci ty of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, tha.t tl,e Ci·ty TI-easLI.rer or DepLlty Treasurer is authorized to make electronic fund transfers with any bank, or other financial institution authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, for investments of excess cash, payment of bond principal, bond interest and a fiscal agent services charges, monthly sales tax, and state payroll withholdings and other banking transactions deemed appropriate by the treasurer. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: --------_._._--SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER POLICY The Tn"?2l.SLlt-et-and Dept-I.t.y Treasun;:~I'-a.l~e aU.thcwized to a.ccsss the Banks Customer Money Transfer (CMT) Syst.em for the following services~ 1. To obtain transaction reports listing incoming and outgoing messages and advice of debits and credits. ..:... Initiation of out.going destination, debit and credit of thesE~ -l~.l-E\nc.:;fet-:'::; wi 11 be preprogrammed funds transfers that contain fields that remain constant. The preprogramming p':;2I-·fDI-mec:l 0[-updi=." ted bv Ban kemp 1 o\.'ees U.pC:ln written request from the City • ..,. "-' " TIlt::: CI"'1T ";:; \/:;:; t.em pr-c:;···./ td es \1.2l ll.ta.b 1 e. s;·ec u. r-.i t ':./ f E~a tLt t-'e':::; tl~ p t-2\/en t U.n~3Lt thot-i zed ind i v idu.:O:1.1 S ·3.CC.:;2':;:·S to th<::: syst£0m. CMT a J. IOlrJs. the Ci t'x' to information is accessed by each authorized user. A User ID is unique to each person accessing CMT. a.ccE'sS the P 2. S ':::;.1.'" 0 f-' d A password is required to .1.'::'; C ha.n<;'ied b':;i U5er. The password is not displayed on the screen as you key it so that security is iirc\intained. Both User ID 8< p.:::t.SSI;.)OI·-,j must be ente;'-ed ccn~ectl\! to a.cc,.",s;:; system. After three unsuccessful attempts you are automatically disconnectc Anyone re-dialing into CMT will receive the error message, USER NL AUTHORIZED. First Bank will not accept a pho~e call, asking to verify the password the request must be in written in order to access the system. A personal identification number is the same as the security code issued for telephone initiated wire transfers. Call ba.ck. pc-:'Ttie':3 an~ tt-'IE-? the fin;;;d. a.I . ..I.thol'-ity ·to d.ppl-·DVE' ~\)in.:~ tl'-i::\r·j·::,·'fi.2rS" Should First Bank question the authenticity, dollar amount, destination bank, etc., of 2 wire transfer, a Call-Back Party is contacted. Repeat codes offer increased security ever Freefcrm Fedwires because beneficiary bank, name and account number cannot be changed. Wire tran~fers that use repeat codes include Repetitive ~edwi!-es. Semi-repetitive Fedw~res. By~ '-~ ,::;.t n g l-ne~;; -:=;1;:1.(;] E: ], .i. !TI.l t~~\ t. i c)n s f 0 r-i,\i i t'-e t ~-~3n'~ of e !.-in .i t. i -:;.. t:L on :' t hi:? c.i t .~/ C E.:'.!! establish greater internal controls. Initially a repetitive code has been set LI. jJ tl~ IN i f-e iTlOti C?'/ to t l""1f? \,/ ,':". ! .... .i CJU. S O:3.n J..:. S <=t.n d -f i jl·:":i.n c i '~'.l in '::; t:J_ tu. t i Clr-, ~::; ': (~~ 1 ~=(J ,3. fr'E'e'~Ci!'-!n c~:..n be rn2\de tCJ i:i·-~.n·~:;·fE~t-:1.i: -the .in':::,titLi.-:'ion h·::+.s rlCJt be '?f"1 ~-;t"?~: t.l.p v\l.·~th r"::2 p<;..:: t i. t. :i~ \·/C·~I c cd E~~::· " tA.! hen ~::;.. C~M-r i::; t-€.:'q L~ .1. l-·F.,d ~. i-e P E: -I::.i. t i. \/(=-: c (]d (= (J ,.... 'f ! .... ;:=1= f:,) !-~ 111 .1_ ':; ':fl t.'2 f-'€-:~d e.n d a. hi:'_l~-d c Clr:)"~/ .i·::,; P t-J n tF::c:! ~:., t t hi:? V-Jc."! r-I·· ... ~:; tc.-=" t i (In €:i. t C:.i. t·/ ;"1211,. 'r his transaction is kept on file with confirmations from the bank or financial i r-\'5 t j .. t. L.t ·t. i C')rl '1 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING APRIL 30, 1992 • • ~----------------------------------------------- 1991 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: April 30, 1992 * * REVENUES * * 1992 1992 • ADOPTED 1991 4/30/91 % ADOPTED REVISED 4/30/92 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL RECEIVED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL RECEIVED GENERAL FUND: GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 10,386,400 10,211,200 INTERGOVERNMENTL REVENUE 208,000 245,200 LICENSES 131,300 151,400 BUILDING PERMITS 1,050,000 902,500 OTHER PERMITS & FEES 608,000 587,000 RECREATION FEES 786,300 747,900 COURT FINES 250,000 181,800 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 110,000 236,000 TRANSFERS IN 385,000 436,000 OTHER REVENUE 542,000 600,900 26,669 241,095 190,436 287,965 38,677 50,000 128,333 36,419 SUB-TOTAL 14,457,000 14,299,900 999,594 FUND BALANCE TOTAL GENERAL FUND EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FUND: CERTIFICATE PROCEEDS OTHER REVENUE TRANSFERS IN FUND BALANCE 675,000 478,500 15,132,000 14,778,400 999,594 ====== ======:======== 357,500 1,900,000 24,500 5,783 12,700 TOTAL EQUIP ACQUIS FUND 357,500 1,937,200 5,783 = == == = = == == =:======== GRAND TOTAL 15,489,500 16,678,400 999,594 ====== ======:======== 0.00% 0.00% 17.61% 26.71% 32.44% 38.50% 21.27% 21.19% 29.43% 6.06% 6.99% 0.00% 6.76% 0.00% 23.60% 0.00% 0.30% 6.45% 10,402,400 10,402,400 261,800 261,800 130,000 130,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 665,000 665,000 837,000 837,500 175,000 175,000 150,000 150,000 596,200 596,200 442,000 442,000 9,418 349,194 207,941 344,923 49,466 50,000 198,733 15,558 14,659,400 14,659,900 1,225,233 1,137,600 1,198,900 15,797,000 15,858,800 1,225,233 ======: ====== ======== 593,400 593,400 14,700 98,800 593,400 706,900 o 16,390,400 16,565,700 1,225,233 ======: ====== ======== NOTES: Property Tax and Intergovernmental revenues are normally collected in July & December. The bulk of Licensing activity occurs during the 4th quarter, 1991 activity reflects the opening of a new liquor establishment. 0.00% 0.00% 7.24% 34.92% 31.27% 41.18% 28.27% 33.33% 33.33% 3.52% 8.36% 0.00% 7.73% 0.00% 0.00% .~ 0.00% 7.40% • -~ .-:;.,~ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: APRIL 30, 1992 • * * EXPENDITURES * * 1991 1992 1992 ADOPTED 1991 4/30/91 % ADOPTED REVISED 4/30/92 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDED ---------------------------------------------------------------- OPERATING EXPENSES: LEGISLATIVE 84,600 84,600 35,328 41.76% 86,600 91,600 44,540 48.62% - ELECTIONS 11,500 15,300 2,551 16.67% 80,500 80,500 35,601 44.22% CITY MANAGER 165,200 160,000 48,671 30.42% 174,300 174,300 60,403 34.65% ASSESSING DEPT 329,100 309,100 98,256 31.79% 312,200 312,200 102,683 32.89% INSP /SAFETY /FACILITIES BLDG INSPECTION 529,600 504,400 156,810 31.09% 526,900 526,900 174,362 33.09% SAFETY 51,500 51,800 11,819 22.82% 58,200 58,200 20,693 35.55% FACILITIES 595,800 553,700 191,201 34.53% 612,800 612,800 200,417 32.71% PARKS/RECREATION ADMIN & PARK PLAN 153,900 146,600 42,759 29.17% 171,700 171,700 49,290 28.71% PARK MAINTENANCE 751,000 730,500 184,163 25.21% 804,300 809,000 212,665 26.29% REC ADMIN & SP EVENTS 164,400 175,800 54,727 31.13% 203,000 203,000 50,168 24.71% COMMUNITY CENTER 527,000 542,000 165,032 30.45% 563,600 563,600 230,074 40.82% BEACH 77,600 67,100 319 0.48% 68,500 68,500 1,323 1.93% ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 176,700 173,200 52,676 30.41% 178,700 178,880 51,682 28.89% RECREATION -YOUTH 208,100 195,400 45,310 23.19% 215,000 216,570 58,898 27.20% RECREATION-ADULT 77,600 87,000 22,435 25.79% 81,200 81,200 27,454 33.81% RECREATION -ADAPTIVE 15,200 24,200 1085 4.48% 46,000 46,000 11,951 25.98% HIST & CUL ARTS 39,500 54,600 6,057 11.09% 45,600 45,600 8,309 18.22% FINANCE 258,600 259,700 74,372 28.64% 275,100 275,100 89,963 32.70% HUMAN RESOURCES 135,200 149,200 37,677 25.25% 144,300 144,300 55,027 38.13% COMMUNITY SERVICES 147,500 132,200 36,771 27.81% 149,300 149,300 37,723 25.27% .NNINGDEPT 371,600 357,000 109,506 30.67% 354,600 354,600 106,374 30.00% UCE DEPT POUCE 2,730,500 2,805,700 819,849 29.22% 2,887,800 2,887,800 968,595 33.54% CIVIL DEFENSE 12,800 11,900 8,451 71.02% 25,800 25,800 17,764 68.85% ANIMAL CONTROL 80,400 62,200 16,023 25.76% 78,200 78,200 21,087 26.97% FIRE 446,100 407,900 124,773 PUBUC WORKS DEPT 30.59% 473,900 473,060 101,308 21.42% ENGINEERING 583,800 558,200 162,867 29.18% 641,400 643,350 193,744 30.11% STREETS & DRAINAGE 1,118,600 1,164,700 232,503 19.96% 1,163,400 1,163,400 246,610 21.20% EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 584,700 557,300 176,477 31.67% 583,800 583,800 161,201 27.61% STREET LIGHTING 398,000 353,700 117,048 33.09% 381,500 381,500 125,180 32.81% SOLID WASTE MANAGEMT 35,000 37,200 7,103 19.09% 31,900 31,900 11,092 34.77% SHARED SERVICES GENERAL 433,800 339,600 136,266 40.13% 429,800 429,800 109,076 25.38% DATA PROCESSING 91,000 91,900 29,028 31.59% 98,500 98,500 40,302 40.92% PUBLIC INFORMATION 91,900 95,000 7,256 7.64% 70,700 70,700 23,125 32.71% LEGAL COUNSEL 100,000 157,700 23,082 14.64% 105,000 105,000 9,727 9.26% EMPLOYEE BENEFITS & TRAINING 1,684,400 1,630,700 503,804 RESERVE 30.89% 1,853,500 1,853,500 568,423 30.67% CONTINGENCY 275,000 . 155,000 21,600 13.94% 157,000 148,500 83,956 56.54% ------------------------------------------------ TOTAL PERSONAL SVCS, COMMODITIES, AND CONTRACTUAL SVCS 13,537,200 13,202,100 3,763,655 28.51% 14,134,600 14,138,660 4,310,790 30.49% ------------------------------------------------ • 1~~$6 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: APRIL 30, 1992 * * EXPENDITURES * * • 1991 1992 1992 ADOPTED 1991 4/30/91 % ADOPTED REVISED 4/30/92 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDED CAPITAL OUTLAY: CITY MANAGER 5,700 6,000 6,016 100.27% 5,700 5,700 0.00% ASSESSING 8,200 4,700 3,058 65.06% 700 700 0.00% INSPECTIONS 4,300 800 0.00% 3,000 6,500 0.00% SAFETY 3,200 1,400 1,400 0.00% FACILITIES 200 0.00% 13,000 13,000 782 6.02% ADMIN/PARKPLANN 350 0.00% 400 400 360 90.00% PARKS MAINTENANCE 2,600 1,900 0.00% PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY 302,200 292,300 79,963 27.36% 293,100 324,200 14,923 4.60% RECREATION -SP .EVENTS 500 13,900 0.00% 500 500 0.00% COMMUNITY CENTER 12,200 18,500 13,523 73.10% 16,200 16,700 2,519 15.08% BEACH ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 200 250 250 100.00% 200 200 0.00% RECREATION -YO UTH 500 900 0.00% 500 500 0.00% RECREATION-ADULT 1,400 1,600 0.00% 900 900 0.00% RECREATION -ADAPTIVE 450 0.00% HIST & CULT ARTS 250 0.00% 600 600 0.00% FINANCE 6,000 5,300 2,425 45.75% HUMAN RESOURCES 1,800 995 55.28% 2,500 2,500 0.00% COMMUNITY SERVICES 500 200 0.00% PLANNING 3,000 4,000 979 24.48% 5,800 5,800 0.00% POLICE 121,800 166,700 88,512 53.10% CIVIL DEFEN SE 25,500 25,500 12,825 50.29% • ANIMAL CONTROL 19,000 18,800 17,604 93.64% FIRE 51,500 38,900 23,863 61.34% 840 835 99.40% ENGINEERING 6,600 3,000 0.00% 1,400 2,200 800 36.36% STREETS 49,000 17,900 4,981 27.83% 173,000 191,000 0.00% EQUIP MAINTENANCE 89,100 53,300 46,699 87.62% 6,000 9,000 2,995 33.28% DATA PROCESSING 4,100 6,693 163.24% 3,000 3,000 0.00% PUBLIC INFORMATION 25,000 4,500 4,500 0.00% EMPL BENEFITS & TRAINING 400 0.00% ------------------------------------------------ TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 738,000 682,000 308,386 45.22% 532,400 590,140 23,214 3.93% ------------------------------------------------ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,275,200 13,884,100 4,072,041 29.33% 14,667,000 14,728,800 4,334,004 29.43% ------------------------------------------------ RESERVATIONS OF FUND BALANCE: NEW CITY HALL 661,800 661,800 0.00% 700,000 700,000 0.00% CAP IT AL FACI UTI ES 400,000 400,000 0.00% PW/PARKS STORAGE FACll 175,000 175,000 0.00% 0 0 SEVERANCE OBLIGATIONS 20,000 20,000 0.00% 30,000 30,000 0.00% ------------------------------------------------ TOTAL RESERVATIONS 856,800 856,800 0 0.00% 1,130,000 1,130,000 0 0.00% ----------------------------------------------- GENERAL FUND TOTAL 15,132,000 14,740,900 4,072,041 27.62% 15,797,000 15,858,800 4,334,004 27.33% ======================== ======================== • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: APRIL 30, 1992 * * EXPENDITURES * * 1992 1992 1991 ADOPTED BUDGET 1991 ACTUAL 4/30/91 % ADOPTED REVISED 4/30/92 % ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDED EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES: ELECTIONS PARKS COMMUNITY CENTER POUCE FIRE ENGINEERING STREETS EQUIP MAINT UNALLOCATED 60,000 252,000 45,500 8,900 119,300 45,300 20,600 4,607 0.00% 3.86% 0.00% 0.00% 37,100 37,100 37,771 117,600 125,600 15,200 15,200 4,020 133,700 230,100 105,024 67,500 69,900 17,785 2,900 2,900 164,400 185,100 72,875 55,000 41,000 5,901 0 ------------------------ EQUIP ACQ FUND TOTAL 357,500 194,100 4,607 2.37% 593,400 706,900 243,376 ======================== ======================== GRAND TOTAL 15,489,500 14,935,000 4,076,648 27.30% 16,390,400 16,565,700 4,577,380 ======================== ======================== NOTES: Spending level should be approximately 33% at April month-end . • nation of those divisions exceeding this level, or varying significantly from the previous year are as follows: gislative -1992 actual expenditures reflect annual dues paid during the first quarter. Elections -1992 actual expenditures reflect costs associated with 1 of the 3 budgeted elections, piuS costs for the park bond referendum election. Community Center -1992 actual expenditures include compressor repair parts and labor associated with the freon ice plant breakdown that occurred in late 1991. Human Resources -1992 actual expenditures reflect annual dues paid during the first quarter. Civil Defense -1992 actual expenditures include budgeted renovations to a communications van. Data Processing -1992 actual expe nditures reflect an annual system development charge paid in January. Contingency -1992 actual expenditures include costs associated with the CPT building (Sterling & Cluts), the wetland permit issue (Larkin), park bond ref publications, and on -going landfill testing (Lehman) . • 101.81% 0.00% 26.45% 45.64% 25.44% 0.00% 39.37% 14.39% ERR 34.43% 27.63% ACTUAL FUND BALANCE ******************** RESERVED for Encumbrances RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses RESERVED for P.W. Storage Facility RESERVED for Severance Obligations RESERVED for New City Hall RESERVED for Capital Facilities UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE PROJECTED FOR YEAR-END 1992 ******************** RESERVED for Encumbrances RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses RESERVED for P.W. Storage Facility RESERVED for Severance Obligations RESERVED for New City Hall RESERVED for Capital Facilities UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: APRIL 30, 1992 * * FUND BALANCE * * (unaudited) BALANCE 12/31/91 61,407 73,718 325,000 213,000 661,800 o 3,372,777 4,707,702 ACTUAL REVENUES 1,225,233 1,225,233 RESERVATIONS ACTUAL OF FUND EXPENDITURES BALANCE (61,407) (73,718) 30,000 700,000 400,000 (4,198,879) (1,130,OOO) {4,334 ,004) o • BALANCE 4/30/92 o o 325,000 243,000 1,361,800 400,000 (730,869) 1,598,931 ========== =========: ==========: =========: =========: (unaudited) RESERVATIONS BALANCE BUDGETED BUDGETED OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDITURES BALANCE 12/31/92 61,407 (61,407) .~ 73,718 325,000 325,000 213,000 30,000 243,000 661,800 700,000 1,361,800 0 400,000 400,000 3,372,777 14,659,900 (14,667,393) (1,130,OOO) 2,235,284 -----------------------------_. -------------------- 4,707,702 14,659,900 (14,728,800) 0 4,638,802 ========== =========: ==========: =========: =========: • • • • 1992 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS ****4*****************************, This report incorporates the following adjustments which have been requested and approved since adoption of the 1992 Budget in December 1991: 1. Transfer from Employee Benefits to all divisions for wage adjustments effective 1/1/92. (union wages have not yet been adjusted) 2. 1991 Encumbrances -items approved in the 1991 budget but unspent as 12/31 and encumbered for expenditure in 1992: $3,500 Inspections computer equipment $18,000 Streets Roberts Drive Trail project $3,000 Equipment Maintenance plasma cutter $12,000 Parks capital outlay softball fencing $17,000 Parks capital outlay staring lake storage building $96,400 Equip Acq Fund police radio tower $2,400 Equip Acqu Fund fire batteries for portables $4,700 Parks Red Rock Lake aeration power installation $800 Engineering capital outlay -chairs $1,950 Engineering pavement/sub grade testing $180 Organized Athletics color paper $170 Youth Recreation color paper 3. Transfer $14,000 from Equip Maint equip certifs to Streets equip certifs -delete budget for 2 small pickups and add 1 4x4 truck, with revenue from the sale of the old vehicle making up the difference ($1,300) . 4. Transfer ($2,100) from Contingency to Parks Capital Outlay for purchase of trailer tracks. 5. Add $61,000 to Water System Maint budget for purchase of 3 utility vehicles. 6. Transfer $5,000 from Contingency to Legislative for increase SW Transportation Coalition dues. 7. Add $23,000 to Parks Certifs for skid steer loader to be funded via deleted equipment repair budget in the General Fund ($4,000), deleted 4x4 truck ($15,000) and revenue from the sale of the old vehicle ($4,000). 8. Transfer $400 from printing to drop off center svcs within Solid Waste 9. Add $1,400 for youth open gym program to be funded via $500 in progran revenues and $900 transfer from contingency. 10. Transfer $1000 from printing to pt wages within Rec Admin community brochure program. 11. Adjust Streets Certifs budget for purchase of 2 new dump trucks rather than the 1 new purchase and 1 refurbish originally budgeted. Total increase from $90,000 to $108,700 to be financed via a trade-in value($7,000), unspent appropriation for snow plow equipment($5,700), and sale of property/auction revenue($5,400). 12. Transfer $840 from Fire training supplies to Fire capital outlay for smoke machine budgeted incorrectly as a supply item. 13. Reinstate $500 aquatics capital outlay budget for item inadvertently omitted from the 1992 budget. • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 26-92 AN ORDINANCE REVISING THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AND ADOPTING THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (REVISED JULY, 1992) PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 415.02 AND 415.021; AND, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Revision and Adoption. The CITY CODE of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, heretofore adopted ("CITY CODE"), is hereby revised as set forth and contained in that certain document known as the CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (Revised July, 1992), hereafter "CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992)" and CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992) is hereby adopted, pursuant to authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 415.02 and 415.021. Section 2. Availability of the CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992). The City Clerk- Treasurer has caused the CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992) to be printed in loose leaf form and copies thereof in a substantial quantity are available for general distribution to the public at a reasonable charge. The date on which this ordinance shall have become effective shall be deemed to constitute the publication of the CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992). Section 3. Prima Facie Evidence. The CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992), is hereby declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Section 4. Preservation of Rights and Obligations. The adoption of the CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992) shall not affect or impair any act done, right vested or accrued, proceeding, suit or prosecution commenced, prior to the effective date and under the CITY CODE provisions then in effect, but the same shall survive to a conclusion thereof. It is the express intent of this Section that no offense committed, liability, penalty or forfeiture, civil or criminal, under the CITY CODE provisions in effect prior to the effective date of the CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992) be in any way affected by the adoption thereof. Section 5. Penalty. Every person violates the CITY CODE (Revised July, 1992) when that person intentionally performs an act therein prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced as for a misdemeanor to not more than 90 days or a fine of not more than $700.00, or both, or, as for a petty misdemeanor, sentence of a fine of not more than $100.00. Section 6. publication. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on • ______ , 19_, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 19_. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of ______ _ • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-145 RECORDING CONFORMANCE WITH DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT HIPP'S MITCHELL HEIGHTS FOURTH ADDITION WHEREAS, on March 20, 1979, Hipp's Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation (Owner) and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation (City) entered into a certain Developers Agreement (Agreement) pertaining to that certain property referred to as Hipp' s Mitchell Heights Fourth Addition; and WHEREAS, the Owner has complied with the provisions of said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that the Owner is in compliance with said Agreement and has so advised this Council. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City finds that: All items of the Agreement have been satisfactorily completed. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1992. ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas Mayor CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE- HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-155 --'-''''-----.,'-,-------RESOW,£-ION-A£GEP-'l'-ING-BID---'. '--'- -·--WHEREA'S·,·pursuant· tcr-'an 'advertisementfor-bids"fcrr --the following--· .. _·_·_· '--'. __ .----_.--, improvements: I. C. 52-256 Bluffs East 12th Addition I.C. 52-242 --..... ,-# -----.-~ -' bids _we,re received ,_opened .. and.J::apula_t~dacC9rdJ1)g .. t;()_1..aw._ .. Th9~e J:>Jds received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and, . -'WHERE;\S-, . the--Ctty--Engi-neer-rec'onmrended--award 'of' cont ract· -to :--., -'''''--'--''----------,----, Nodland Construction Company, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as --follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter --in'to' a"-c'ontractwith Nodland Con-structf6n Company~ Inc. in the name of _ .. the C.it;y.of Eden Prairie in the amount of $363,884.80 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file -in the.-office ..of the-City Engineer. .. _ .. _ ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1992 Douglas Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST ____________________________________ --L John D. Frane, Clerk SEAL: ----e· • L 1-' Hansen Thorp ~ ~ Pellinen Olson Inc . • ~ l Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors • • June 26, 1992 City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attn: Alan Gray, P.E. Subj: Construction Bids I.C. 52-194, 52-256, 52-242 Dear Mr. Gray: -Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, June 25, 1992 for the above referenced projects. The bids are shown on the attached Summary of Bids. The Engineers' Estimates totaled $377,532.50. The low bidder, Nodland Construction Co., Inc. came in below the Engineers' Estimates at $363,884.80. See below for breakdown by Improvement Contract. Preliminary estimated improvement costs have also been included for reference • Low Bid Engineers' Preliminary Estimate Estimate I.C. 52-194 $169,779.30 $174,995.00 (RTPO) $168,000.00 (RTPO) I.C. 52-256 $159,207.50 $167,537.50 (RTPO) $161,469.50 (Developer) I.C. 52-242 $ 34,898.00 35,000.00 (City) Recommendation is made that the City Council award Improvement Contracts 52-194, 52-256,52-242 to Nodland Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $363,884.80. This recommendation considers the receipt of a favorable bid below the Engineers' Estimate and that the City Council reserves the right to award the contract in the best interests of the City. Respectfully, HANSEN TRORP PELLINEN OLSON INC. Ciaui£ r2 Laurie A. Johnson, P.E • LAJ:dnb encl (612)829-0700 • 7565 Office Ridge Circle • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3644 • FAX (612)829-7806 I L/D() SUMMARY OF BIDS I.C. 52-194 I.C. 52-256 I.C. 52-242 DESCRIPTION: Creek Knolls Cul-de-Sacs, Bluffs E. 12th Addition and Valley View Road Sidewalk BIDS OPE NE D: :::.J-=u.::n.:::.e_2::.:5=-,~1:...:9....:9....:2:.--_-=-1 O~: O=-O::.--=a:..: • ....:m~. CONSULTING ENGINEER: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. CHECKED BY: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. BIDDER Nodland Construction Co. Richard Knutson Inc. Ryan Contracting Northdale Construction Co. Inc. G.L. Contracting Inc. BID SECURITY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The undersigned recommend award of Contract to: Nodland Construction Co., Inc. TOTAL AMOUNT $363,884.80 367,474.95 375,171.11 393,301.20 453,515.88 as the lowest responsible bidder for these Improvement Contracts. U(/JJ,i U (J. 0-kw" ., Consulting Engifieer Alan D. Gray, 'P.E. City Engineer l~J \ • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-156 RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR I.C.52-264 Special Assessment of Sewer Connection Fees BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City Standards and advertise for bids thereon. 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on July 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 100% PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property described below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed with making the following described improvements: Specify Type General Location Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Street Paving X Other: Pennit & connection fee* 15480/15490 Pioneer Trail Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially assessed against the property described below in accordance with the City's special assessment policies. We further understand that the preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is $2.280.50 (one-year assessment) * Metro Sac, City Sac, permit fees for sanitary sewer services for duplex Street Address or other Legal Description Names and Addresses of Petitioners of Property to be Served MUst be Pflners of record); -/ / 15480/15490 Pioneer Trail x a21U-ut~//L~ ,/ x 7 Ii r/ 'A~ /, ~ ~~ L/Zf Chris Brandvold #3 Blue Flax Littleton, Colorado 80127 =========================================== (For City Use) I Z~ 1907 Date Received: _~-=-v_",_£ __ , __ . _L.. ________ _ Project No.: .1 t:. S-,2 -..2~ z!' Council Consideration: ~J::.....-<1~L;/'_f,_(_SJ_9 _L _____ _ '~03 • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-157 .--.':.=.:.:: .. ::: .. -.. :-.-.-~' -•. -.-.. -.. ~ ::. ------:-.''': - -~ ---.... - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS PREPARED BY .. ------. -_.. ·_··-HENNEPIN COUNT-Y FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY STATE AID IDGHWAY NO. 18 (NORTH PORTION OF BLOOMINGTON FERRY BRIDGE) _. _____ .. __ WHEREAS, Plans Jor Hen.nepinCOl,lIJ.ty rr9j~tNo_._ 6816jSt$}.t~ l:'IOJ~t. ______ . No. 27-618-62) showing proposed alignment, proflles, grades and cross . -sections for the construction, reconstruction or' improvement of County State Aid Highway No. 18, as a Federal/State Aid Project, have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL that said plans be in all things approved. -.. --" -- ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1992. Douglas B. Te~pas, Mayor ATTEST· SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 'uaU I. i • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-158 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN CREEK WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Creek has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Eden Creek is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated June 30, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 140S MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council members THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: June 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Fmal Plat Approval for Eden Creek PROPOSAL: JMS Development Corporation has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Eden Creek. Located east of Eden Prairie Road and adjacent to Mere Drive, the plat contains 6.6 acres to be divided into 11 single family lots, one outlot and right-of- way dedication for street purposes. Outlot A contains 1.21 acres and is intended to be dedicated to the City for conservation purposes. • HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council June 2, 1992 per • Resolution No. 92-110. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report was executed June 16, 1992. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 21-92, Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5, was finally read and approved June 16, 1992. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets throughout this project will be installed in conformance with City Standards and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: All requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding for the installation of public utilities within this project will be required prior to release of the final plat. 14DG • • • • Final Plat Approval for Eden Creek Resolution No. 92-158 June 30, 1992 Page 2 of2 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the fmal plat of Eden Creek subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $374. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $918. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $440. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. JJ:ssa cc: Jeffrey Schoenwetter, JMS Development Corporation Egan Field Nowak, Inc . 1401 • STAFF REPORT TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: e ___ . ~ . c Planning Commission Chris Enger, Director of Planning Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner June 5, 1992 Twin City Federal Twin City Federal North of McDonald's, West of Highway 169 1. Zoning District Amendment on 1.06 acres. 2. Site plan review on 1.06 acres. ----= -- Staff Report Twin City Federal June 5, 1992 BACKGROUND This site is currently zoned Commercial Regional Service based upon a development plan for a bank approved by the City in 1978. The zoning district change was based upon a site plan (see attachment A). Since the site plan as proposed is different from the plan approved in 1978, the zoning district is technically amended by approving a new site plan. A site plan review is required for all projects except single family. The site plan review is based upon criteria as shown in the attached section of the City code. SITE PLAl'i The site plan depicts the construction of a 5,000 sq. ft. Twin City Federal Bank had a base area ratio of .11. The Commercial Regional Service Zoning District would allow up to a .20 base area ratio. The base area ratio is a ratio of the square footage of the first floor of the building divided by the total land area of the site. The site plan as proposed meets the setback requirements for the C-Regional Service Zoning District. Highway 169 is the only public street frontage, and the building is setback beyond the 35 foot front yard setback requirement. Other roads are private and no setback is required . The parking required for a bank facility based on a ratio of 6 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area or 30 parking spaces. The site plan as proposed depicts 30 parking spaces. Parking spaces are shown on the site plan at the required minimum 35 foot setback from Highway 169. ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION The City retained the services of Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc. to conduct a preliminary access and internal circulation review of the bank facility. This review was based upon a previous site plan " (see Attachment B) in which the building was orientated in a different direction. Based upon that site plan, the traffic study indicates that there would be conflicts between vehicles exiting the drive-thru area and cars backing out of the permanent parking spaces. Due to these concerns, the site plan was revised with a clear separation of drive-thru and permanent parking ; spaces. This eliminates congestion within the parking lot at the drive-thru exit. The traffic study also indicated that the access location and turning radii at the driveway entrance would be acceptable. • • The Planning Staff has required that there be room for a minimum of 4 parking spaces per drive- thru lane when there are 4 drive-thru bays or less. This would mean a minimum of 16 parking spaces. The site plan as proposed has the ability to stack up to 40 spaces within the drive-thru area. The drive-thru capacity is adequate. • • • • Staff Report Twin City Federal June 5, 1992 ARCHITECTURE City code requires that exterior materials in the Commercial Regional Zoning District be a minimum of 75 % face brick and glass. The building as proposed meets this requirement. The site plan review ordinance requires that the building be compatible with other construction details, materials and colors with buildings in the area. This would suggest that the exterior brick should be a brown color to match the exterior colors of McDonalds and Tower Square. Brick detailing should also match Tower Square and McDonalds. The exterior materials board (which will be available at the meeting) shows a red brick, black shingles and white metal which is not compatible with the adjoining buildings. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the exterior materials board and building elevations to be compatible with construction details materials and colors of McDonalds and Tower Square. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required for this project is based upon a caliper inch requirement based upon the square footage of the building and screening of the parking areas. The caliper inch requirement is determined by dividing the building sq. footage by 320 or 15 inches. The amount of landscaping required to screen the parking area is based upon site lines from adjoining roads. There is minimal room within the setback to create a berm high enough to screen parking, therefore, the landscape plan must rely heavily on plant materials. The landscape plan should be revised to include additional conifers along Hwy. 169 and the entrance drive to better screen parking areas. (See Attachment C.) UTILITIES Sewer and water service is immediately available adjacent to this site within the service road. Storm water runoff will drain into an existing storm sewer system within the frontage road also. SIGNS The sign as proposed depicts a pylon sign on Highway 169 at a setback of 35 feet. The pylon } sign detail meets the City code requirement for a maximum of 20 feet in height and 80 square feet in sign surface. LIGHTING The lighting standards proposed will be 30 foot high downcast cutoff luminaries (shoe box) similar to the lighting standards used at Me Donalds and Tower Square . /lJ 10 Staff Report Twin City Federal June 5, 1992 SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS Concurrent with the construction of this project, an 8 foot wide bituminous trail must be extended along Highway 169. In addition, a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk will be constructed along the entrance road and service road were shown on the attached site plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The planning staff would recommend approval of the zoning district amendment on 1.06 acres and site plan review on 1.06 acres based on plans dated June 5, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 5, 1992, and subject to the following recommendations: 1. Prior to City Council Review the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. A revised exterior materials board and building elevations which are compatible with construction details, materials and colors as McDonalds and Tower Square. B. Revise the landscape plan according to Attachment C. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion plans to the City Engineer. B. Detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans to the Watershed District. C. Payment of cash park fee. D. Exterior materials and color samples. E. Final landscape plan with revisions according to Attachment C and security amount. I!I I ; '1 ( i • • • - • '/ ,/ ~/ • • ! ---_:..--:.... __ . /~ ,/ >J~.~-i 0 . \. ".' I \; \, -----\ \ , /:' I <0 .. '; ( '-' .' I --' ~6':. I T \ -, .. ' I I -' I. "'1 , I '..-_J \ '. \ • --/~ / ~ -.. -.. --.. ---.'~ " .. -:" .. 8T' 1/1 I .8 :c <£ ~L!5 --..-. ) ( !t;i "i- I ank Plan ----Ai .. -----.-... ---... ...-. 4. ______ .. _ --~.--",--.­. "'-----.. .-- ~c......c:u..a~ , ------"-C' .,..,. ___ • ..,.. ....... ~0011111. ___ "'001 t_ ... .,-.... » .... _-....... "'-........... r-...... c...~ ___ c-.or, __ -'U' ____ «'~­---,-""--"'. ,-"" ST! lOCATlOff IilAI" .. , ...... ,I l Earthwork CalculatioD8 c..a.q c., '" ---IIcr .,. . ... nl n. nil lUCY 1<2 .. i.tCT . 'Uey T.la) rt -140 m T.,..II 1.,. 124 __ r a..I..u !'I--114-" a.,.n (~--.... f(---,\ c c: £ Q) --------f---____ _ .... " ............. / " \ r? (,:1,. r-:: n I":' r .. : u···· .... Ii'. ! I., l:: IJ J L!;; n I ' -. ·;;jr.IH~G DEPT. U) 1992- , / / / / .-". N E ~..r: ,..-(.) K.JeO~ca ~r.,. ..... m ..... ~<l: Legend -IU -.d.tI .. c..to .... ." ---Pro"... .. Ce.t..,.. o • • II uti., M.H .• r c." p_~ C.IL p,. ...... 1I.a. 1.&'11 .. e. .... b._u._ 1118&e ij r ... peMo4I e •• ., 0.-.0 ... ---w.t..,.~'" u .... 1,2,3 Dr.I •••• A, ... Dr.I •••• C.lc.J,a,U._ A,... I: CO" I II It 0.117 .... Q I .• era A, .. l: C 0.11 I ... It. 0.10' A. q 1.1 ere A..r_':COOI I II .& 0.&10 A, Qt .• ere T .... I·BIt. q .... en SHEA .... -.-.. -_ .. - _ a-ln'''''' .. ,...,., - O'.'l~FR TCF e eel :::,$'" H1C\ . .fI~ T "Ii L~ TeF SANK EDEN PRAIRIE LSA 1m;!:", Illc. ~~-.. ~ t:'''''.ftn.~~ MIIII-.,..... ~t!"f \'-ttl .U.l ..... ·rt_ .. ~'cu ... ···l ~ Gradinge ._--_ .. _ ..... -._ .. __ .~a_ .. _._-_ ... _. ---.... ~--..-... ... ... _. .. "---_ .. - ---.....,.1 .... iRfmTIln i c c • 1 / / • / / / / /-8 __ --11' ------7 -/ ./ / / / / --/ /' -----<-__ 8H _------------ ( --- Landscape Revision 14:U Attachment C r 7 'wem:r:sW5 #._ E. F. G. Odor. No activity or operation shall cause at any time the discharge of toxic, noxious, or odorous matter beyond the limited of the immediate site where it is located in such concentrations as to be detrimental to or endanger the public health, welfare. comfort or safety or cause injury to property or business. Glare. Glare. whether direct or reflected, such as from spotlights or high temperature processes, and as differentiated from general illumination, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the immediate site from which it originates. Wastes. All solid waste material, debris, refuse, or garbage shall be kept within a completely enclosed building or properly contained in a closed container designed for such purpose. AIl liquid wastes containing any organic or toxic matter shall be discharged with into a public sanitary sewer or treated in a manner prescribed by the City. The rate of liquid waste discharge into the City sanitary sewerage system shall not exceed 200 gallons per site acre per hour between the hours of 9:00 o'clock a.m. and noon. Use for the dumping or storage above ground or under the surface of chemical waste and other hazardous waste products will not be permitted because of the potential hazards that may be created to public health, safety, and welfare in all Districts. Subd. 5. Perfonnance Standards -Tests. A. B. By ~er. In order to assure compliance with the performance standards set forth above, the Council may require the owner or operator of any permitted use to have made such investigations and tests as may be required to show adherence to the performance standards. Such investigation and tests as are required to be made shall be carried out by an independent testing organization as may be agreed upon by all parties concerned, or if there is failure to agree, by such independent testing organization as may be selected by the Council after 30 days notice. The costs incurred in having such investigations and tests conducted shall be shared equally by the owner or operator and the City. unless the investigation and tests disclose noncompliance with the performance standards. in which event the entire investigation or testing cost shall be paid by the owner or operator. By City. The procedure above stated shall not preclude the City from making any tests and investigations it finds appropriate to determine compliance with these performance standards. Source: City Code Effective Date: 9-17-82 Subd. 6. Site Plan and Architectural Design Review. . A. Approval Required. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any (i) building or structure situated or to be constructed within any District, except, (a) those within the Rural District or One-Family Residential Districts. and (b) duplexes (dwellings designed for or occupied by two families). or (ii) building or structure constituting a public facility and service. situated or to be constructed within any District. including but not limited to Rural and One-Family Residential Districts. unless it shall conform to a Site Plan and Architectural Design as described in C. hereof. or an amendment thereof. which has been approved by the Council and such approval is effective as hereinafter provided. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of an alteration or enlargement of a (i) building or structure situated within any District. except. (a) those within the Rural District or One-Family Residential Districts. and (b) duplexes (dwellings designed for or occupied by two families). or (ii) building or structure constituting a public facility and service. including but not limited to Rural and One-Fa~i1y Residential Districts. unless it shall conform to a Site Plan and Architectural Design as described in C. hereof. or an amendment thereof. which has heen approved by the Council and such approval is effective as hereinafter provided. 11-23 Site Plan Ordinance l~J i~ f .... ,_( I I I I Ii I -. II Ii I D • D U &II II II II II II .. II B. C. D. E. The approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Design shall be effective for a period of two years from the date first approved by the Council. provided however. the Council may within the two year period (or any extension thereof as hereinafter provided) extend the two year period for an additional period or periods of two years each. . Source: Ordinance No. 25-89 Effective Date: 8-17 -89 (Prev. Ordinance No. 1-89 Effective Date: 3-9-89 Exceptions. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to the issuance of a building permit for a building or structure to be built or constructed on land in confonnity with a Site Plan approved prior to February 21. 1989. but not more than two years prior to issuance of the building pennit by the City Council in connection with the rezoning or platting of the land. The Director of Planning may detennine that an alteration or enlargement of a building or structure is minor and does not require confonnance with an approved Site Plan and Architectural Design or an amendment thereof. provided however. if the Director shall not make such a detennination an owner of· the land on which the building or structure intended to be altered or enlarged is situated may request the Council to make such detennination. The terms "Site Plan and Architectural Design" as used in this subdivision mean a plan produced in written, graphic and/or pictorial form prepared by a registered architect. landscape architect or engineer which shall include the following: (1) a detailed natural systems analysis which documents existing physical features such as vegetation. soil types. slopes. hydrologic systems, wildlife. and ecology. (2) proposed construction of all site alterations including grading. drainage. utilities. and storm sewer. (3) building locations, (4) landscaping and screening. (5) lighting, (6) plans for all pylon. monument. and building signs. (7) an architectural plan of the exterior of the building ~r structure intended to be constructed. altered, or enlarged situated on the site depicting the building elevation. including its height from the surface of the ground in its altered or finished condition; its width and depth. its location in relation to the land on which it is situated. and its external appearance such as materials. texture and color. and (8) such other information as may reasonably be required by the City. The owner of property for which approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Design is required by this subdivision may apply for Site Plan and Architectural Design review and approval by filing an application with the Director of Planning on the form provided by the Director of Planning and containing the information required by such form accompanied by a Site Plan and Architectural Design. together with such further information as may reasonably be required by the Director of Planning. A Site Plan and Architectural Design may be evaluated by the Council according to its compliance with the following standards and provisions: 1. 2. 3. Adherence to. and consistency with. the City's policies and objectives as retlected In the Comprehensive Guide Plan; Adherence to, and consistency with. the City's Code relating to zoning .md the subdivision of land. The preservation and enhancement of the natural and huilt environment as well as those modifications already effected by development and construction upon the land. including the minimization of: tree loss. soil removal. wetland. t1oodplain. lake amI creek encroachment; and 11-24 F. 4. the maintenance of the general natural topography or physical grade of the land consistent with that of adjoining properties. Maintenance of open space to provide a desirable environment both for occupants of the site and the general public. 5. Transitions where there are differences in land use, building mass, height, densities, and site intensity, in proximity to that which is the subject of the Site Plan and Architectural Design. Transitions may be accomplished by increased setbacks. berming. plantings. larger lot sizes. lower densities. lower flood area ratios. and smaller buildings. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Provision for safe and convenient vehicle and pedestrian traffic. including interior drives and parking arrangements which facilitate clear access to public streets. appropriate widths for drives and access points. and the separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The minimization of negative impacts upon other land uses of surface water run-off. noise. glare. odors. vibrations. dust. loading areas. parking areas, and refuse areas. Compatibility of materials, textures, colors, and other construction details with other structures and uses in the vicinity. Such other conditions and criteria as are reasonably related to the health. safety and welfare of the residents of the City and to preservation of the environment. Source: Ordinance No. 1-89 Effective Date: 3-9-89 Preservation of Heritage Preservation Sites as designated by the Council pursuant to Section 11.05 and adherence to, and consistency with. the City'S policies and objectives as reflected in the Heritage Preservation Site Program. Source: Ordinance No. 38-90 Effective Date: 12-7-90 The Site Plan and Architectural Design may not be acted lipon by the Council until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission or until 60 days have elapsed from the date it has been referred to the Planning Commission for its study and report. No approval shall be given until a public hearing has been held thereon by the Council. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least 10 days before the day of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property to which the requested approval relates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners may be used. A copy of the notice and list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the person giving the notice and shall be made a part of the records of the proceeding. The failure to give mailed notice to the property owners or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceeding provided a bonafide attempt to comply with this provision has been made. Approval of the Council shall require a two-thirds vote of all the members of the Council. 1 1-25 1~\1 Source: Ordinance No. 1-89 Effective Date: 3-9-89 I .-• I • • I II I I I I II •• I • • • EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED MINUTES MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1992 A.TWIN CITY FEDERAL by Twin City Federal. si te Plan Review on 1.06 acres. Zoning District Amendment within the C- Regional Service Zoning District on 1.06 acres. Franzen reported that TCF has always been a part of proposed plans for this area. The plan currently in the packet has been changed in response to concerns of the traffic engineer consulted; drive-thru traffic has been separated from parking traffic. Jim Ruckle of Shea Architects explained that the building had been rotated 90 degrees to adjust traffic flow. This change leaves all 30 parking stalls usable & unblocked by drive-thru traffic. The plan also includes screening along 169 with visibility for signage. stored inside the building. Trash will be Sandstad asked about the necessity of the curb cut being perpendicular to the roadway, Franzen replied that the traffic engineer had recommended it at right angles and there is 30 feet of space to work with. Hawkins pointed out that attachment B showed a different curb cut. Sandstad pointed out that drive-thru's don't look good from the road anyway, and "c" would look better from 169. Kardell asked if the future ATM site would interfere with traffic flow; the architect answered that it may never happen and could very well remain indoors. Kardell and Hawkins asked about card-key entrance to the. vestibule for ATM use; no definitive answer was given however Franzen said that the ATM location had been moved at the recommendation of the police department for lighting and safety reasons. Sandstad asked about the exterior appearance and whether it would match surrounding buildings (Towers and MacDonalds); Franzen presented the materials board and noted that TCF is willing to work with city on colors and materials as those currently proposed are too contrasting. Franzen recommended that the Commission approve the Site Plan with three amendments; 1) revising exterior materials and elevations to match those surrounding, 2) revised landscape plan, and 3) widen out the drive and soften the radius. MOTION 1: Kardell moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0-0. MOTION 2: Kardell moved, seconded by Clinton to approve the request of Twin city Federal for site Plan Review on 1.06 acres based on plans dated May 8, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated June 5, 1992. Motion carried 5-0-0. Hawkins stated that he felt the plan must include indoor accommodations for trash, as he has raised concern about paper trash in the Tower area before. All agreed that it would be acceptable to add this condition to approval: also the correction of the bituminous trail/concrete sidewalk positioning on the plan. MOTION 3: Kardell moved, seconded by Clinton to approve the request of Twin City Federal for zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Zoning District on 1.06 acres based on plans dated May 8, 1992, subject to the • recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 5, 1992. • Motion carried 5-0-0. • • • • SRF STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS TRANSPORTATION. CIVIL. STRUCTURAL • ENVIRONMENTAL. LAND SURVEYORS May 20, 1992 Mr. Michael Franzen Senior Planner CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 RE: PROPOSED TCF SITE PLAN REVIEW Dear Mr. Franzen: SRF No. 0921681 We have conducted a brief site plan review of a proposed TCF Bank located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of T.H. 169 and Regional Center Drive. Our study consisted of analysis of general circulation patterns within the site, but as requested, did not include estimates of trip generation, parking demand or queuing analysis . The site plan dated May 8, 1992 shows a single driveway access in the southeast corner of the site to/from the Eden Prairie Center perimeter road. A one-way driveway follows counterclockwise around the building, serving employee parking, six drive-through bank aisles and a drive-up ATM. Customer parking is located in front (south) of the building. One area of potential concern was the interaction of the proposed driveway with traffic in the Eden Prairie Center parking lot. Review of aerial photos of the site indicates that the proposed, driveway would align with an outbound parking lot aisle. This' alignment should facilitate the driver's ability to monitor traffic movements when leaving the TCF Bank site. Another potential concern was access to the drive-through from the north on the perimeter road which requires a 15 foot radius u-turn. The space provided for-this movement is adequate for passenger vehicles and for small single-unit vehicles, such as delivery vans. It is assumed that this is adequate for bank operations. If larger vehicles need to drive behind the building Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 612/475-0010 \ II cfAX 6121475-2429 40.U Mr. Michael Franzen - 2 -May 20, 1992 (e.g., large snowplows), they would have to either approach from the south or turn around in the front parking lot. Since the driveway to the site is quite short, the ability to provide adequate signage is limi ted. However, because most of the drivers using the drive-through will be regular users, this is not expected to cause major problems. The main driveway to the site is a minimum of 28 feet wide near the first parking stall. Since the driveway widens out toward the perimeter road, it would be possible for three vehicles to stand side--iJy-side (one inbound and two outbound) _ This would allow vehicles turning right to bypass a single vehicle waiting to turn left_ Widening the driveway by up to four feet at its narrowest point, however, would provide more flexibility in how the driveway is used, allowing more than one vehicle to . be bypassed. It should also be noted that the customer parking area is located only one car length back from the perimeter road. It is likely that use of at least the first two parking stalls will be limited at times by vehicle queues at the driveway. • Although a queuing analysis of the drive-through aisles was not • conducted, the site plan appears to provide adequate space for vehicle storage assuming all aisles will be in operation during peak periods. If vehicles back-up beyond the provided storage area, it is possible that the employee parking spaces may be blocked during peak time-periods. The two-lane width of the aisle behind the building allows some maneuverability in this area. For instance, vehicles could queue in the left lane, while parking maneuvers occur in the right lane. Perhaps the greatest conflict area on the site will be at the drive-through exit. The large, open paved area is expected to accommodate both the one-way traffic exiting the seven drive- through aisles and the two-way traffic using the customer parking spaces. There is little opportunity for channelizing movements to reduce vehicle conflicts_ Typically on this type of development, the drive-through area would narrow into a one-way driveway prior to exiting into a two-way parking area. In the proposed site plan, all drive-through aisles connect individually to the parking area. Because of the large size of the paved area, it will be difficult for drivers to follow flow patterns and determine which vehicle has the right-of-way. • • Mr. Michael Franzen - 3 - May 20, 1992 One option to improve this situation, given the current building layout, would be to make the area south of the drive-through into one-way operation with diagonal parking. This would require drivers to go behind the building and around the drive-through to use these spaces. It would also, however, simplify the flow of traffic out of the drive-through area and eliminate conflicts in this area. If this option is explored, it would be critical to provide a through lane around the drive-through area and minimize queuing. Thank you for the opportunity to review this site plan. have any further questions, please call. Sincerely, STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. ll",-~~v~ Nancy L.VHeuer, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer If you • NLH:bba • 1422- • • • BORUCKI ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #92-150 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION REGARDING THE REQUEST OF JIM BORUCKI FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT BACKGROUND Jim Borucki has requested preliminary plat approval for .62 acres into 2 single family lots within the Rl-13.5 Zoning District. 1. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed subdivision would create lot sizes which are inconsistent with the immediate area. Lot sizes of the adjoining lots are 20,000 in the Carmel Subdivision and 112 acre or greater in the Farber Subdivision to the south. The density of the proposed subdivision at 2.4 units per acre (including a portion of Rowland Road right-of-way) would be inconsistent with the density of lots in the Carmel Subdivision lots 4 and 6 plus a portion of Dunhill Road right-of-way) at 1.9 units per acre. 2. The proposal is inconsistent with the original PUD. The original PUD depicted 1 lot for the parcel. 3. The lot should be of a size and shape to allow for replacement of the old house in the future to conform with front yard setbacks. In 1990, the Borucki's received a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments based upon an existing condition for the house which is at a setback less than 30 feet from Rowland Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE that based on these findings and conclusions, the request of Jim Borucki for preliminary plat approval is denied. ADOPTED by the City Council on July 7, 1992. John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-150 BORUCKI ADDITION RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BORUCKI ADDITION FOR Jim Borucki BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Borucki Addition for Jim Borucki dated June 8, 1992, consisting of .62 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of July, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • -------------------------- • • STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning June 19, 1992 Borucki Addition Jim and Pauline Borucki 6517 Rowland Road Preliminary Plat of .62 acres into 2 lots 8RYANT·S 1 Staff Report Borucki Addition June 22, 1992 Background: The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as low density residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. The site is currently zoned R1-13.5. The surrounding properties are zoned R1-13.5 to the north and east and R1-22 to the south of the project (Farber Addition). This site is part of the 1984 Carmel planned unit development, zoned R1-13.5 for 87 units on approximately 58 acres of land. Approximately 15 acres of land was dedicated to the City. The net density based on 43 acres (including road right-of-way) is 2.03 units per acre. The Borucki Addition was reviewed by the Planning Commission in 1990. The Planning Commission recommended 4-0 to approve the request to subdivide property into two lots with tum arounds on both lots and to await the completion of the improvements to Rowland Road. (Site vision distance on Rowland Road was poor and the Commission felt that homes should not be built until the site vision distance was improved. The City Council recommended denial based upon Resolution 90-230 (Attachment A). In general the finding and conclusions base the denial on the inconsistency of the lots with the immediate area, inconsistency with the original PUD, unsafe access to Rowland Road, and premature timing on the project. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of .62 acres into two lots. Both lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district. The requirements are a 13,500 square foot minimum lot size and 85 feet of street frontage. There is an existing house on proposed lot 2, and an existing garage on proposed lot 1. The· garage on proposed lot 1 would be removed concurrent with the construction of a new house. Both lots have the ability to construct the house (first floor 2200 sq. ft.) and a two car garage. Access Rowland Road is under construction at this time. At the time that this project was originally submitted, the staff made the determination that site vision distance was poor and that no additional construction on lots should occur until the roadway was improved. Although the improvements to Rowland Road will provide for the appropriate amount of site vision distance, there should be provisions for tum arounds on each of the proposed lots so that future homeowners would not have to back into traffic on Rowland Road. • • • • • • Staff Report Borucki Addition June 19, 1992 Utilities Proposed lot 2 is connected to City sewer from the Carmel Subdivision. There is an existing water line in Rowland Road. City sewer terminates approximately 300 feet to the south of the site but could be extended to serve proposed lot 1. Gradin2 Since the site is relatively level adjacent to Rowland Road, a minimal amount of grading will be necessary in order to accommodate the homes as proposed. No significant trees will be lost due to construction. Transition One of the findings and conclusions of the Denial Resolution was that lot sizes are inconsistent with lots in the immediate area. Attachment B shows the immediate surrounding lot sizes in the Carmel PUD. Although the proposed lots are smaller, an additional house could be built, and still provide a visual transition. Lots 4 and 6 on Dunhill Road sit approximately 13 feet below the Boruki parcel. Attachment C is a site section showing the views of the proposed house. Where there are transitions in lot sizes or densities, the City has historically required a buffer zone to minimize the views. In this case, a landscaping and berming mitigation plan along the common property line may help the additional lot fit in better with the surrounding neighborhood. A 15 foot setback to a new house is a limited amount of area for planting transition. The Staff would suggest a 25 foot setback along the common property line to allow more room for a berm and landscaping. A potential landscape buffer plan and house pad configuration as it is shown on Attachment D. What Can Be Built on This Lot if the Subdivision is Not Approved? According to code, the owner can remove the existing house and build a new house on the property at the 15 foot minimum setback. A new 4 car detached garage can also be built at the 15 foot setback. Both of these structures would be as visible from the adjoining property as if a new house was constructed, but no buffer plan could be required. Staff Report Borucki Addition June 19, 1992 REASONS FOR AND AGAINST APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT Reasons For: 1. The density of the original Cannel PUD is 2.03 units per acre. The additional lot would increase the overall density of the PUD to 2.06 units per acre or a 1.48 % increase in the lot density. 2. Improvements to Rowland Road are under construction, and by the time a house could be built on the property, sewer could be extended to proposed lot 1, and site vision distance would be corrected along Rowland Road. Each of the proposed lots should have a tum around so the cars can enter forward into Rowland Road. 3. The density of the proposed subdivision was originally calculated on the net area was 3.2 units per acre but compared to the maximum guide plan density of 2.5 units per acre which is calculated based on gross acreage. When densities are calculated in a proposed subdivision, road right-of-ways are included in the calculation in density, therefore, 112 of the width of Rowland Road (8500 sq. ft.) should be added which would reduce the density to 2.4 units per acre. 4. Although the lot sizes are smaller than the adjoining area, a landscape buffer plan with a restriction on side yard setbacks could screen views of the new house. Reasons Against 1. The proposed subdivision would create lot sizes which are inconsistent with the '. immediate area. Lot sizes of the adjoining lots are 20,000 in the Carmel Subdivision and 112 acre or greater in the Farber Subdivision to the south. The density of the proposed subdivision at 2.4 units per acre (including a portion of Rowland Road right-of-way) would be inconsistent with the density of lots in the Carmel Subdivision lots 4 and 6 plus a portion of Dunhill Road right-of-way) at 1.9 units per acre. • • • • • • Staff Report Borucki Addition June 19, 1992 2. The proposal is inconsistent with the original PUD. The original PUD depicted 1 lot for the parcel. 3. The lot should be of a size and shape to allow for replacement of the old house in the future to conform with front yard setbacks. In 1990, the Borucki's received a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments based upon an existing condition for the house which is at a setback less than 30 feet from Rowland Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. If the Planning Commission feels that the Subdivision as proposed can fit in with. the surrounding lot sizes in the immediate area, and is consistent with the over-all intent and purpose of the original PUD, then one option would be to recommend approval of the proposed subdivision based upon plans dated June 19, 1992 subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 19, 1992 and subject to the following conditions: a. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: 1. A modified preliminary plat which depicts a 25 foot landscape buffer plan as depicted on Exhibit D and restricted sideyard setbacks in order to provide for mitigation of the views of the new house from the existing lots in the Carmel Subdivision. 2. Modify the preliminary plat to depict tum-arounds on each of the proposed lots. b. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: 1. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. 2. Submit a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan for review by the Engineering Department. If the Planning Commission feels that the subdivision as proposed is inconsistent with the adjoining lot sizes in the immediate neighborhood, is inconsistent with the original Carmel PUD, and the impacts on adjoining home in the homes in the neighborhood can not be mitigated, then one option would be to recommend denial of the project as proposed. ( CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #90-230 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION REGARDING THE REQUEST OF JIM BORUCKI FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT BACKGROUND Jim Borucki has requested preliminary plat approval for .62 acres into 2 single family lots within the Rl-13.5 zoning District with variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. ·.The lot size is inconsistent with lots in the immediate area. 2. The lot density taken by itself would be 3.2 units per acre, City ordinance allows only 2.5. 3. Additional access to Rowland Road should be limited. • 4. The lot should be of a size and shape to allow replacement of the Old. house in the future to conform with front yard setbacks. 5. 6. 7. Site distance to Rowland Road is unsafe. The proposal is inconsistent with the original PUD. The timing of the project is premature. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE that based on these findings and conclusions, the request of ~im Borucki for preliminary plat approval is denied. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 4, 1990. Attachment· A • nents are shown thus: I r-5 I I I : 0 L _______ l _____ _ • ss otherwise indicated, and adjoining lot lines, joining street lines, as shown on the pia t. 1 L{ ~ I ---- 20 /9 6 -~CrCO I'" I· z 1'""" !.. l i:'C 0': Lr:-\ ~~ : ~.~ ::--; I:-~"r'\ j :." •. ::.., • . ~ ~--.~,' it:' : .. ?~~., ........ , "-~", ~JI "-~~ '" ~ Surrounding Lot Sizes Attachmenf B~ .0 ~ o - - --t-I~ • • • View Of Proposed House Attachment C • • N EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION UNAPPROVED MINUTES MONDAY, JUNE 22, 1992 Borucki Addition Franzen gave a history of the project, and introduced Jim & Paula Borucki. • • Jim and Paula Borucki addressed the points on which the Council denied this request previously. 1. The proposed lot size is mathematically consistent with those in the surrounding area. 2. The lot density is less that that allowed when figured differently. 3. One less driveway than currently exists will reduce access to Rowland Road rather than increase it. 4. Front yard setbacks can be met on both lots. Kardell asked if the configuration of the lots has been changed since last submitted. Borucki stated that the lot split was the same but the house placement was different. 5. The upgrade of Rowland Road has changed the site distance and improved safety in the area. 6. The original PUD indicated an intent to split the lot, the City recommended not to split the lot due to condition of Rowland Road. The Borucki's showed slides of property and pointed out proposed boundarys and the new home -including a small detached garage for the original house on the site. Staff Report -Franzen addressed the transition question. An acceptable transition can be accomplished despite the difference in lot size based on a landscape mitigation plan. One lot won't make a difference to the PUD as a whole, but the immediate neighborhood must be considered. A letter from the Ed Siebers is attached. • Jim Carroll of 11815 Dunhill Road approached the Commission with a letter which stated opposition to the • ision for safety reasons and a potential negative affect on surrounding property values. Mr. Carroll's mary concern is the privacy of his lot due to the difference in elevation between his lot and the proposed site for the neW" home. He wants a berm and large trees to protect his privacy. He would rather see the lot split than a new garage built on the existing site. Nancy Dow of 11789 Dunhill addressed the Commission with her concerns of privacy also, which she feels she'li lose if the lot is split. She wants the protection she's paid for from decreased property values. She stated that their were no guarantees that the landscaping would be completed. She also raised the question of who will pay for water/sewer access? Franzen responded that the Borucki's would have to bear the cost of this to the best of his knowledge. Ed Sieber of 11792 Dunhill provided a letter regarding his opposition to the lot split, which is attached. He pointed out that Lot 5 is a part of Carmel, not adjacent to it. The lot split would increase density to an unacceptable level. Safety and clutter questions will reflect themselves in property values if the lot is split. Bauer stated that he is tentatively in favor of the project. Hawkins said that he is not in favor due to density, the appearance of the rest of the neighborhood, and the fact that the Borucki's may move and the next property owner may not develop as shown here today. Kardell pointed out that PUD's are regularly amended and she is for the development. Franzen interjected that the plant materials could be more contiguous and that the developers agreement would accompany any purchase • that land and include landscaping. Sandstad feels the split is appropriate as submitted. Clinton moved, seconded by Wissner to close the public hearing -motion carried 6-1. Clinton moved, seconded by Hawkins, to deny approval of the Borucki's request for Preliminary Plat. Motion carried 4-3 . • . . . ?EQUES'f FOR PRELIIENf...RY PL,\I' ..;'A1!ES & 2AULDIE 2\.)i{UCI<:: b3~"7 ~Qir.:_.ANIJ ?Cl>.D 5S3-.i4 ~~;o ( ~ j Sl::.g~-= ::amll~l J..C~5 -.;3.. :.r::.a t.i1e 6/1/'j:2 r:.nC1.ngs 2r..d .:;on;:, ~ 1...1SlCnS ,3.(!c1_):,,-.::d c ~t :'~l~ ,~ 1 t.~r :~o~_inc 11 t)n ~.::t~tenLJe r :±. 1·=,~(..~1" T,lnl(~n iiE ~'10l:.l.j 11~-\'2 l:"ecc'ns:.:ir::rec. Cl1 .. :e t.c :"'-::C=!1L. (:r:dn\~es. :;. • 'd J 1.l!1:i..:'5 (ten~:::l t,; to UD1CS p~r a~re cr incr~ase. Th~ dens1CY or cne 10C :.a~en 35 1CS 8m entlty lS acre ar:a cn15 15 dlre~tlY r213tea CC r-~SJlL~.atJ..tJllS . There T,;~ll De no s:..::e l5 ':tccesse::: aC:Ctitlon. There are pr':;3ent.~'/ C!1r,;-el·~ I d'::lF::\la'i:: CJr. ::h..:: actGltlon i-llll na";:: a t.CL~L':" 0:: t',i(;(.c:! ,jr1';-::t,ic.yS. to': ~ 1-1 :..11 ,-, •. -:; :' ', ... L... . j.::: 1..1111[,3 r;er • • • • • • Pi let<::.er \-las malled to our nelghiJors to sollclt the lor lonput and suggestJ.cns to this proposal I see Attachment D). lie ar~ v-=r::y -::mpathet1.r'; to thelr coneerns and ile are hcpeful that tr.lS pr::opr)sal vil11 be mutloally benetlr::lal to :ill ccm':::e.::-ned partles. E~j":lj· et:Jrt ~il.l.l. J:e m.~.ce c.'~ en::ur-= a coordlna~2d b~enalng and a posltlve ennancement to the ar-=a . ITS > hist c2: .Ju3C> 3UBC> incr a 2000 C,':f~/'r~ 1.0, 5/~r-;),$ rlCit;l.; TIt), V * Subcommand does not end in . or ; (: assumed) 3UBC> . ~istoqram of Lot Sizes N = 88 :·!idpoint Count 10000 1 ~2000 0 14000 28 * * * * .. * .. * * * .......... * ............ * * .... * .. ('1_ "'.. . "'. 16000 18 ****************** 18000 13 ************* 20000 11 *********** 22000 4 **** 24000 2 ** 26000 5 ***** 28000 2 ** 30000 1 * 32000 1 * 34000 0 36000 0 38000 1 * 40000 0 42000 0 44000 0 46000 0 48000 1 * "':, .. : / . . .. '-' --' /' :..'.; .. .-tTB > print c6 / C6 10000 13000 13000 13000 13430 13500 13500 13500 13521";-13524 13556~ 13700 13800 13900 14000 14000 14000 14000 14200 14378 14378 14600 14600 14800 15000 15000 15000 15200 16000 16000 16000 16000 16200 16224 16456 16500 16500 17000 17000 17000 17000 17000 18000 18000 18000 18000 18000 18080 19000 19500 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 20128 21645 22000 22000 23000 24100 25000 25000 25400 27000 27000 30800 31000 37000 47000 MT8 > nopaper i ' '\ ~ I J4~1 • (', . • 13500 13500 13950 14000 14500 14560 15500 15800 16500 16500 17204 17300 19000 19052 20172 21000 25000 25000 • • • • ATTACHMENT B Lot Size Variance Comparison Address 11;:;93 uunn::'_l rtOa'l 113b 7 11841 1131S 11. /d'..~ 11 is.::. l181S 11:-4-1 11b it) .1l8'..~b Lot Size 1 t· , 'j 50 1'!,'::l1C1O 1'5, S~l\;J :::u,12::; 1:::-, :)',}U 19 ,(,J5:::: 1:., ),J'c' l-t ,. _>~I..) CurrenL lOL Slze = ,::,:,07/ squar~ re~L Ne\l It)t. SlZ~ = 1 ~,jb~ s<''Juar,~ r~~~ Current Val:"::.ance 1U,1.27 12,2.7/ 11. 57', 6,949 1,57 '7 3,997 1~.,~7/ 1...j,S}/ 1."::, "J 1 i ... U4,lUtO h),4h} Varlance = Absolute value ot l~t Sl=e dl:terences Ne\v \j·:tr.lance 3,394 1,:'::4"* 1,94.J: ~, :hq 5,4::-6 4, :;:';4 1, ~~l~4 :"'2 . 1'1 .:>,-_ ..... CERTIFICATE Of SURVEY i " I I I For: HANS HAGEN HOMES, INC. P"'()poud LDI Divi.r/on PI"": "Jim Bot'u.cki ~S17 R.ow/and Rd. r=dl.J1 Pra/~ri(, 5534-4- Phont,: 744--b!J§J No/{/.: S~t! .fhu/ 2 ror dtscr'pf/orJS or prop0.l~od parce-/.s· A ttncl 8 ' Lot 5, Block 2, CARMEL, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I I I I I I w I ..9- !q-0J 81 ~C'lU) I ~ ~ .... I ! ····l~ I I I I I I I SCALE:! Inch =.3.0..Feet 0 Denotes Iron Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. Job 1'Jo~~ Book-==- We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a surv"uy of the boundaries of the above described land Clnd of tho loca t ion of all buildinQs. i ( any. thereon. and all visible encroachments I if any. from or on said land. o E. G. RUD a SONS I INC. by ~.JJ-~-82~ IV~O Dated this £ay of ~I. 19 85. cI /.0/ Div'/r/crn ~A'ols1 Minn. RalJ. No. 9..90,£ E. G. RUD a SONS I IN LAND SURVEYORS 9560 Lexington Avenue N. New Brighton (Lexington), Minnesota 55112 Telephone: 786 -5556 ('I. .1 f r '" n, CERTIFICATE Or SURVEY Pro Pd)~cI Lol Divis/on Wy-: Jim Borucki C,5/7 I<owlcrnd Rd. Eden pra/r;'e 55344- 'Phon,. : 944--C953 Parcel A Proposed Descriptions That part of Lot 5, Block 2, Carmel, Hennepin County, Minnesota, north and west of the following described line: lying Commencing an assumed along the of the line West 59.66 West 112.03 at the most northerly corner of said Lot 5; thence on bearihg of South 2 degrees 15 minutes 29 seconds East east line'thereof 50.00 feet to the point of beginning to be described; thence South 64 degrees 14 minutes feet; thence South 33 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. Parcel B That part of Lot 5, Block 2, Carmel, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south and east of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 5; thence on an assumed bearing of South 2 degrees 15 minutes 29 seconds East along the east line thereof 50.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 64 degrees 14 minutes West 59.66 feet; thence South 33 degrees 01 minutes 20 seconds West 112.03 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. SCALE:i Inch =.=::..Feet 0 Denotes Iron Bearings shown are on an assumed datum. Job NO,f'J2CI Book -==-Page== hereby certify that this is a true and correct represenlalion of a survey of tho aries of the above described land and of the location of all buildinQs, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. 3 J! 911 E. G~. RUD a SONS ,~. Dated this _O_day of Way 1914. " , -/; R.elli~ed 7/24 IN I U \ by ~Iinn. R~'J. No. 2~ E.G. RUD & SONS, INC. LAND SURVEYORS 9560 Lexington Avenue N. Circle Pines. Minnesota 55014 Telephone: 786·5556 ~~.\ ..i.... ~ \ \ ~~:\.\\'\" 1"\ ~ ~------------------------ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY f I , . I i " I I For: HANS HAGEN HOMES, INC. Propou.d Lol DiviJ'/on {dt-I . Jim BOYl-u.ki C517 Row/and Rei. "r=clL" Pra/ri~ 55.34-4- PhonG: 144--C!J5J .... -.. " .. ~..£"" a .... "". .... '. " .. .. 110/4.: SU!. f'hu/ 2 rar ck.S'crlj:JI/Ol'Jf or prop"r~'d parc.t./.!' .4 ancl 8 ' Lot 5, Block 2, CARMEL, Hennepin County, Minncsotu. I I I I I ~ I ~. 1I1Lf') I ~-!¢~ BI~~U). I~ . I ! . . " "l\ . I I I I I I '-./ I ..... )~, 1\0: Io. ........ ~ ~ ~ .~< ~ SCALE:l Inch =.3(LFeet 0 Denotes Iron Bearings shown are on on assumed da1um. Job t-.k>:-~ Book==- w. hereby certify that this is a true and correc' representation of a survey of the boundaries of 'he above ducrlbed land and of the loco tion of all buildinQs I i ( any I thereon, and all visible encroachmenls I if any I from or on said land. l"H . E. G. RUD a SONS, INC. Oo'ed this ~day of /;:1'. 19 85. b ~-; £~ 'l(~2.. p~ooo~{C/ fol Div/r/oY") !:"ho/S1 y u;~~ PM" 'J" t}..Q~P E. G. RUD a SONS I INC. LAND SURVEYORS 9560 Lexington Avenue N. New Brighton (Lexington), Minnesota 55112 Tcleohone: 7A6 -I)SI)f; • • • June 22,1992 EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION I ( Borucki Addition ). On March 27,1984 the Ci~y Council approved the Carmel Subdivision. Carmel is comprised of 65 acres including 20 acres of park and 87 homes. The developer, Hans Hagen, as per a visit with him, said he desired to divide lot 5 but staff had indicated that would not be desirable. Hans also donated cost free four acres and at a cost of $13,000 per acre:. less than his cost another 16 acres for park purpose, and was required to advance $25,000 to the City for Rowland Road maintenance. These costs were added to the Carmel lots at the rate of $3,413.97 per lot and charged to the new owners. Therefore the Carmel density of 1.33 homes per acre did not come expense free. Rowland Road had an actual traffic count in 1991 of 2,177 vehicles per day projected to 4,354 VPD by 2011. However improved Rowland Rd., plus the Bryant Lake Regional Park ( about 180 acres plus beach and boating facilities ), plus the potential of 100 more homes in this quadrant, plus the increased office and industrial park use in the locality will most certainly move the 2011 projection up to at least year 2000 or before. New Rowland Road with its bike path and walk path will also be inducing more people to the area and the speed control of traffic always very poor will open the door for the question of safety . In other words this body,concerned with planning, I would guess would ask the question of themselves that if we could be starting from scratch would we recommend all the driveways presently entering Rowland in the light of the present traffic ? If the answer is no then how can one more entry be justified? Due to the profile of Rowland Road in the area of the new driveway serving lot 5 several other additional problems are created that deteriorate the safety margin. Therefore we feel that the City is responsible to the residence of Carmel, in view of their unique participation , to maintain .. a density of 1.33 units per acre. Lot 5 division would be 3.22 UPA. The Rowland Road improvement along w~th its bike/walk path configuration will generate both a greater quanity of traffic and a higher speed traffic which another driveway would certainly not add to a safety margin already taxed to its limit . Consequently we strongly urge you to deny the division of lot 5. / r Yo rs. truJjy, ~/' 12~~t- M~ and Mrs. Sieber 11792 Dunhill Road Eden Prairie ,MN 55344 941-2947 Don and Nancy Dow 11789 Dunhill Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear'Dowsl 6517 Rowland Road Eden Prairie, HN 55344 June 1, 1992 We are in the process of submitting a proposal to the City of Eden Prairie to subdivide our property at 6517 Rowland Road. The new improvements to Rowland Road will eliminate many of the issues addressed during the previous submittal. The road site distance to the west of our property will be increased within the city guidelines to assure safe access to Rowland Road and city sewer will be available to access both properties. Your privacy and aesthetic concerns are also very important to us. We hope to make this a joint effort with all of our neighbors and ensure that all of your concerns are addressed. Please find enclosed a picture of the house we will be proposing to build on the new lot. We are very confident that this will be a positive addition to the city of Eden Prairie, the neighborhood, and to your home values as well. Please contact us at 944-6953 to discuss any concerns or suggestions you may have regarding this subdivision. We would welcome any design suggestions such as landscaping, house placement or other ideas which may maximize your privacy. We look forward to hearinq from you soon. Sincerely, "",-, ' ,,-'-~ ," k James & Pauline Boruc i • • • • • • Jim Carroll 11815 Dunhill Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carrollsl 6517 Rowland Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 June 1, 1992 We are in the process of submitting a proposal to the City of Eden Prairie to subdivide our property at 6517 Rowland Road. The new improvements to ROH13l1d Road "lUI eliminate many of the issues addressed during t..'1e previous submittal. The road site distance to the west of our property will be increased within the city guidelines to assure safe access to Rowland Road and city sewer will be aVailable to access both properties. Your privacy and aesthetic concerns are also very important to us. We hope to rocJee this a j':)i.~t ef£or~ t,li:.h all of our neighl)ol-:;; and enzure thz..t all of your c:mcerns are ncl::l!-essed. l?l';;.:lse fir.d crl,~losed a pict.ure: of the house 'rl~ will be p.l'Op')sing t.J build on thE-new lot.. .~€: are very -:onfider.t tilat this \-lill b~ a positiv,=: addition to the city of Eden f'rair1e, the neighborhood, and to your home values as well • Pleasl! contact. l.A.S at ~<1tj,-6953 t.o dizcuzs any COll::.:ern::: or zug;eztl.om; you :!I...~y h~ve regardL"'l'J t.:.is zuD:'i '1i!:i.:.r.. We "HOuld \·t€:l(;~me an:,' dt;Sl;11 .9lggestio:-.. s su·::h az landzcaping, houze pla·~ement vL' c.ther ide:~s imich r.l.Zly maximize ~'cur privacy. h'~ l,)()k foro-lard to r.earing ircw you soor... Sincerely; " " , Ed and Mary Sieber 11792 Dunhill Road Eden Prairie, HN 55344 Dear S1~berss 6517 Rowland Road Eden Prairie, HN 55344 June 1, 1992 w~ are in the proc~ss of submitting a pruposal to the City of Eden Prairie i~O subdi '/ide our property at 6517 Rowland Road. The nf:W improvements to Rovllanu Ro~d ulll eliruinat,€: IIkiny of the issues addressed during the pr~vious sllbm::'t.t;:tl. The road .site dls'tClilce to the west oi our property Hill b= increa.:.ed vii ti. ir. tl,e city guidelines '[.Q assure safe a~ceBS to Ro~land Fcac ~~~nd city ~~wer will be aVaildUle to access both properties. • Your t:-rivacy anc .::.est.!.et:!.c COl.cems are aitio very important to us, We hope to make u1is a )vint ~ffcrt w~th all of our neighbors ~id ensure that all of yuur cor.cerns ar~ addIc:::;sed. Please:: find enclosed a pj.cture of the house \'le ~/ill be pl:'opocing 'to build on the new lot. We are very confident that this will be a po:::itive addition tu tJlf::! city oi Eden Prairie, the neighborhood, ~ld to your helli€; values as well. • Please ccnt~ct us ut 9~4-~953 to discuss any concerns or suggestions you illCo.y have reg~ding tlus subdivision. We would welcome ~y design f>ugg!:!Etions ~uch a!; landscapiIlg, houst:: placement or other l.deas which may maximize your pl'ivac..l'. ~le look forwcu:<l to heaJ.ing from you soon. Sincerely, i '\.'" / James & Pauline Borucki • • • • VAC 92-05 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-159 VACATION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN PART OF WINDFIELD ADDmON WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described therein as follows: All that part of the right-of-way of Melissa Circle as dedicated and delineated on Windfield Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly, easterly and northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast comer of Lot 2, Block 5, said Windfield Addition; thence westerly a distance of 39.29 feet along the southerly right-of-way line of said Melissa Circle, along a curve concave to the north, having a central angle of 45 degrees 01 minutes 24 seconds, a radius of 50.00 feet and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 44 minutes 51 seconds West, assuming the north-south quarter line of Section 18, Township 116, Range 22, said Hennepin County, has a bearing of South 0 degrees 22 minutes 04 seconds West, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence easterly, northerly and westerly a distance of 131.81 feet along a nontangential curve concave to the west, having a central angle of 151 degrees 02 minutes 42 seconds, a radius of 50.00 and a chord bearing of North 18 degrees 17 minutes 12 seconds East to the northerly right-of-way line of said Melissa Circle and there terminating; and: All drainage and utility easements lying over, under and across Lots 15 through 17, Block 2, Lots 1 through 14, Block 3, Lots 4 through 7, Block 4, Lots 1 through 9, Block 5 and Outlot A, Windfield Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota . WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 7, 1992 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said street right-of-way and drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said right-of-way, drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor AITEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk r (J (' » -l H o Z u CHANHASSEN w. z .••••••• 11 •• ' ••••••• • •• 1 ••• :: WINUFIELD 2ND AUDITiON ._---\ ~r~.T. OO-C-.-N-O----~t ?: i;,1 t'-,ll' .'::1 c,,~ I ;~ $11)'10 G._ EASEMENT VACATION SKETCH FOR: THE PEMTOM COMPANY ·1 !'j r-" n.,,, £ ...... , •. '"",. "'. ,_t.' I ,~ /}o/';?;') -~---------------~~~~--------~ ~ ........... "',l"'I"l' / ••• 1...,.. . .-.. L ,-. __ ._~r·t .. ' _ .. -\ ..... ,....-'«Jl.~t.. ____ '--.. ____ _ ____ .~.-. ""!l2 • S()'!'ZOIl'W -' .. / / / .\ / ... ,'!'" <E .. ~J' !", o ." ., •• t:El.L fi\-;.~~ -.Jlli:':;~ 1 }l ... ~ .. n. .. ~ .. ~ .... ~. :4 r --~ .... ~& ,j:.,(:.,~: .. UNDERLYING LOT DETAIL • \1 OJ r. _.f. .. l! t~,· !~. ,3 ------.,. '- z o ~~ ::s ::::s- ====1P- '" __ 0 M ~~----'" .., 5Ol( ,. ,ii':::::5 prM"r.S Ilrrt B.HlO 0,", ,,·c ~",,. SOUf" O<.JNlrr'l lINt a "rr 1'1, r I~. It 71 ",.,(, •• , AS$UIroI(D '0 t4AV( A .... .,",., 0' '0"1,'04'. o C"J,,'r, VI 'N~H , 14 ,'nl t"'", WONV' .. ntr '0 AND "all-LO II "L S t«) ""18 .aFi'N"IIIDQ L"'"'''' tJI'''·'.,,1 • ,,' .... "" C ... ..,., 0 .. ft, ... , ..,,. "'a, to ., ",...cAllD -~" --': ~4" ,.;' ;;;--::~~' ~~r::~(1~ ' ... NOn. rto( ,..-.r: .. ,," uvo ,on ''''S 'II[fOI IS A CO,." C" ~ r"Or,,1OH ", ,)4( U~(CJ"IOtD M.A.f 0' .,,,O"LLO 2NO ACOI'ION VAC. ,,,: tt[IlrLllf (r.!lrHT M 11'1, r'l"lc~ CO","'" ':'''Ar '"IS SUfi",;,. PI""", C'II pt'::JlT ~A' r,r:rA"U' If "', Nil U"C'llt "' OIHCT SU",. ... UJ('M "'"r TlI-'T I AIf A :'UlT Llcrffsro ~tfO SU,,,,Ur"JII l'Nn" '''' u"'s cr ,,,, stAn ('r "1",'UOfA, OAru rM" '"0 0'" Of JUNt:. U". .. o.t0[4(~ , .-IILL, '"0 ... 11---= _"-_/--:;;_-==- J~IIII C, L-..v'~J". L-.... IID IIV,vlI~JII Hlfmt!OTA L-H',,,,,. "0 • .,.11 JI\MES n. IlIll, INC. JOO rIo 1576 filE NO 1·92·r36 q2-. JULY 7.1992 25374 25375 • NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY KRAEMERS HOME CENTER 25376 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK 25377 FORSTER MFG CO 25378 CHICAGO MARRIOTT-DOWNTOWN 25379 HENNEPIN. COUNTY TREASURER SERVICE -PHONE OORDIMIRRORS/PLUGSIHATCHETS/BULBS/ -TAPE/GLOVES/DRILL/PROPANE FUEL & TORCH/ -PAl LS/IGNITER/KEYSINUMBERSIBATTERI ES/DRILL -BIT SETSITHE&~OMETER/CAPS/DOOR STOPS/ -STRINGITUBINGIVALVES/FITTINGS/HOOKS/ -EXTENSION CORD WRAPS/STORAGE BOXES/GREASE/ -PUNCH/GREASE GUN/SPARK PLUGIBUNGEE CORDSI -TOOL BOXES/CHAIN/LATCHESIMUD BOX/ROPE/ -CLAMP-FACILITIES DEPT/STREET DEPT/PARK -MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CTR/ UTILITIES DIVISON -DRILL BITS/CLIPBOARDS/FAN/CONTACT PAPER/ -EXTENSION OORDS/PLIERSIBLADES/WASHERS/ -SANDING BELTS/ANCHOR/KEYSIVALVE/SPRAY -PAINT/MASKING TAPE/CLAMPSIBOLTS/RODSIRAKE/ -BATTERIESIDUST PAN/LETTERSIBRUSHES/ROLLER -COVER & FRAMESIHANDLES/CEMENT PATCH-PARK MAINT/ROUND & RILEY LK BEACHES BOCCE BALL-ORGfu~IZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM SCHOOL LODGING-POLICE DEPT -1ST HALF PROPERTY TAX-7835 EDEN COURT/ EARL MORE HOUSE 25380 25381 25382 25383 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUYERS CARD-LIQUOR STORE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO & FIREA LICENSES-LIQUOR STORES POSTMASTER BUSINESS REPLY POSTAGE-UTILITIES DIVISION CATHERINE WALERIUS -MICROPHONE HOLDERS FOR PORTABLE RADIOS- • 384 385 25386 25387 25388 25389 25390 25391 25392 25393 25394 25395 25396 25397 25398 YVONNE BAUNE SHARON BURGER PAUL CRUGNOLA ROGER DICK JULIA DURDA JOYCE ELTON J ESBENSEN BILL GIBSON JUANITA HALL DEBORAH HARLEY ANNE HATFIELD PEGGY INGBER KRISTEN JOHNSON JOYCE JORGENSON KATHRYN LEVINE 25399 CAThY MAURER 25400 CHRISTINE MARTINEZ 25401 MICHELLE OSBORNE 25402 NICOLE PARENT 25403 DIXIE QUINN 25404 BRIAN REILLY 25405 KATHERINE SAGE 25406 SHERYL TRAINOR "~07 .JOHN TRAUL ~08 STEVE UHLER 3551297 POLICE DEPT REFUND-SWH1MING LESSONS REFUND-SWHlMING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-BIKE TOUR-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND REFUND-SWH1l1ING LESSONS REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS CLASS REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND REFUND-SKATING LESSONS REFUND-MIXED DOUBLE TENNIS LEAGUE REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM -REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM -REFUND-SWI~lING LESSONS/AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM REFUND-CAMP NATCH-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM REFUND-SWIt1l1ING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-MIXED DOUBLES TENNIS LEAGUE REFUND-t1EMBERSHIP FEE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING CLASS 29513.10 629.80 576.54 13.75 400.15 2709.05 12.00 750.00 143.00 12.00 27.00 19.00 27.00 22.00 33.00 2.00 18.00 19.00 10.50 21.00 15.00 66.00 19.00 23.00 12.00 115.00 40.00 23.00 16.50 19.00 19.00 77.58 16.00 27.00 67.00 JULY 7,1992 25409 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 11.18 25410 SKATEVILLE SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 87.50 25411 BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER SLIDE TICKETS-TEEN WORK PROGRAM/FEES PAID .g 25412 CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 25413 MICHAEL LABRIOLA -ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-700.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 25414 BOB OLSON CONFERENCE 'EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 75.00 25415 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER -RENTALS-TABLES FOR BENEFIT FAIR-HUMAN 1038~71 -RESOURCES DEPT/SOD CUTTERS WITH TRAILERS- -STREET MAINT/HELIUM TANK/HELIUM & COFFEE MAKER-WATER PLANT OPERATIONS 25416 SPECIALTY CONTRACTING INC -TRAIL RESTORATION ON ROBERTS DRIWELL 8804.73 BUTTERFLY VALVE REPAIR-WATER DEPT 25417 PAT BARKER -BALLOONS-SENIOR CENTER/EXPENSES-H~l 75.50 RESOURCES DEPT 25418 IAN CALDOW GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 357.00 25419 JOHN FRANE MAY 92 EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 200.00 25420 SUE LANE SCHOOL-FINANCE DEPT 11.00 25421 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC -DICTAPHONE/CASE/CASSETTES-HUMAN RESOURCES 235.67 DEPT 25422 NATIONAL CENTER FOR PRESERVATION -PUBLICATIONS-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION 30.00 PROGRAM 25423 U S WEST PAGING INC PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 24.90 25424 WBCS -PRINTING-FLYERS/APPRECIATION CERTIFICATES-160.00 HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM 25425 ENTRONIX-AUTOSOUND CAR RADIO REPAIR-EQUIPMENT ~AINTENANCE 71.95 25426 POSTMASTER GENERAL POSTAGE-BUSINESS REPLY CARDS-UTILITIES DIV 25.00 25427 AT&T SERVICE 141 25428 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 50 25429 CITY OF EDINA -REIMBURSEMENT-DEPOSITED A UTILITY BILL .. 81 WHICH WAS FOR THE CITY OF EDINA 25430 THE MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSN TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 352.80 25431 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 240.00 25432 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 183.12 25433 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 55.25 25434 AT&T SERVICE 463.32 25435 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 24115.48 25436 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 6075.85 25437 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 75.17 25438 JULIE AASGAARD REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 15.00 25439 LAVERNE ANDERSON REFUND-ORCHESTRAL HALL TRIP-ADULT PROGRfu~S 20.00 25440 LANENA BACKER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 25441 NORWEST BANK REFUND-STARING LK PARK BUILDING RENTAL 69.88 25442 ELLEN BARREDO REFUND-SAILING & GOLF LESSONS 32.00 25443 PAUL BRUENING -REFUND-EXPLORING DRAWING & PAINTING CLASS-20.00 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 25444 SHARON BURGER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 38.00 25445 JOHN CAOOTTE REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 5.00 25446 MARTHA DWORAK REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 5.00 25447 PAUL DWORAK REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 5.00 25448 PATRICIA FUCHS REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS 16.00 25449 RICHARD JENSEN REFUND-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM 60.00 25450 DOLORES KONIAR -REFUND-EXPLORING DRAWING & PAINTING CLASS-20.00 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM .OC 25451 OON LINN REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 4422573 1~'S01\ JULY 7.1992 25452 KATHY JANCI REFUND-TEAM TENNIS LESSONS 27.00 25453 DARLENE LANGAN REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRM1 23.00 C454 OLGA MARINO -REFUND-POTPOURRI CLASS-SENIOR CITIZENS 9.00 PROGRAM 5455 JAN MARS REFUND-SUMMER AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRM1 15.00 25456 ANNE NIGHTINGALE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 25457 ROSE MARIE NOVOTNEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 25458 DONALD PALAN REFUND-GOLF LESSONS _ 33~00 25459 JOYCE REICHOW REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 39.00 25460 LISA ROEBER REFUND-SAILING LESSONS 8.00 25461 GLENN STALLINGS REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 15.00 25462 MAURA STEBLAY REFUND-GOLF LESSONS 39.00 25463 LONA TENPAS -REFUND-CREATING A MASTERPIECE-SUMMER 37.00 LEISURE PROGRAM 25464 RANDI THORNTON REFUND-SWlt~ING LESSONS 51.00 25465 KELLY VORTHERMS REFUND-SUMMER AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 30.00 25466 CYNTHIA WOLFE REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 23.00 25467 ELLEN WRIGHT -REFUND-EXPLORING DRAWING & PAINTING CLASS-20.00 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 25468 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 6-12-92 & 6-19-92 76473.05 25469 EUGENE DIETZ MAY 92 EXPENSES/LICENSE-ENGINEERING DEPT 272.30 25470 CITY OF RICHFIELD MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 13.50 25471 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PEm1IT FEES FOR SANITARY SEWER-PIONEER TRL 2260.00 25472 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1ST HALF PROPERTY T~X-CREEKWOOD PARK 111.94 25473 LAHASS CORPORATION TRANSFER FIBERGLASS-WATER DEPT 525.00 ' 25474 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 6-12-92 SAVINGS BONDS 200.00 25475 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 6-12-92 6244.00 25476 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 6-12-92 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 280.00 .477 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 6-12-92 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 225.69 478 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 6-12-92 2513.76 25479 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 6-12-92 524.90 25480 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 6-12-92 32.00 25481 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 6-12-92 50.00 25482 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 5-29-92 & 6-12-92 1200.00 25483 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 6-12-92 233.75 25484 EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLLS 6-12-92 & 6-19-92 41974.59 25485 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 6-17-92 135.00 25486 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 6-12-92 164.50 25487 MINNESOTA TWINS -TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 150.00 FEES PAID 25488 METRO SALES COMMISSION -PARKING-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 22.00 FEES PAID 25489 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 160.00 25490 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 17.85 25491 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 21013.46 25492 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 315.43 25493 BARBARA ASTRY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 25494 SUE BECK REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 25495 LORELIE BERGMAN REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING CLASS 67.00 25496 CENTRAL STATES REFUND-ROUND L..J\KE PK PAVILION RENTAL 69.80 25497 STEVE ELFSTROM REFUND-SWIt1t1ING LESSONS 24.00 25498 KATHY HALVERSON REFUND-EMERGENCY I-IATER SAFETY CLASS 26.00 25499 DEBORAH HARLEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 .00 TAD HAUCK REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 46.00 01 JANE KELLEY REFUND-SWIl1t1ING LESSONS 57.00 15587152 14SU~ JULY 7.1992 25502 DARLENE LANGAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 38.00 25503 DIANA MASON REFUND-ADULT GOLF LESSONS It 25504 TERRY PALMER REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 25505 BETH PEZON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 25506 LOUISE SCHURLE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 25507 GRETCHEN WEILER REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY Ch~SS 26.00 25508 MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 150.00 25509 HOPKINS POSTMASTER -POSTAGE-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER-HUMAN 2265.48 RESOURCES DEPT 25510 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER 137.19 25511 DAVE BECKER CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT 125.00 25512 ACTION RENTAL CENTERS -RENTAL-CANOPYIHELIUM TANK & REGULATOR-59.32 POLICE DEPT 25513 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 3219.69 25514 YOlD OUT CHECK 0.00 25515 i.-fAINLINE TRAVEL SCHOOL AIRFARE-POLICE DEPT 40b.00 25516 STATE OF MINNESOTA BIKE REGISTRATIONS 441.00 25517 PETTY CASH -EXPENSES-CITY HALL/EQUIPMENT MAINT/SENIOR 74.20 CENTER/ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 25518 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 556.70 25519 RAY MITCHELL DUNK TANK RENTAL-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION 100.00 25520 JIMMY ALLEN ARTIST MGMT LTD -DEPOSIT-ENTERTAINMENT-4TH OF JULY 580.00 CELEBRATION 25521 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN -APPLICATION FEE FOR 1991 CERTIFICATE OF 375.00 ACHIEVfu~ENT PROGRAM REVIEW-FINANCE DEPT 25522 JASON NOARTHCO L P #1 JULY 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 7177.83 25523 OMNI THEATRE/SCIENCE MUSEUM TICKETS-TEEN WORK PROG~l/FEES PAID 99.00 25524 BIRTCHER WELSH JULY 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 231 7 25525 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC JULY 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 49 0 25526 BIRTCHER WELSH JULY 92 RENT-CITY HALL 220 .216 25527 KIM BARRY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 25528 MAIRIN BRZICA REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING CLASS 99.00 25529 JULIE FOSTER REFUND-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM 67.00 25530 PAM FRANDLE REFUND-ARCHERY LESSONS 13.00 25531 MARGARET DE HARPPORTE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 25532 PATRICIA MEYER REFUND-ADULT GOLF LESSONS 27.00 25533 KITTY MUSSER REFUND-SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 12.00 25534 JOYCE PRESTON REFUND-SPRINGBOARD DIVING CLASS 13.50 25535 SALLY SNABB REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 25536 AQUA ENGINEERING INC SPRINKLER HEAD-STREET MAINT 22.31 25537 PAUL W ABBOTT CO INC -INSULATED PIPING ON CARBON DIOXIDE 695.00 STORAGE TANK-WATER DEPT 25538 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC COUPLER NOSE/SEAL-EQUIH1ENT MAINTENANCE 24.52 25539 AIRSIGNAL INC -JUNE 92 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/ FIRE 384.50 DEPT 25540 SHARON SULLIVAN ALVORD SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEPT 22.00 25541 AMERICAN HEART ASSN SERVICE-CPR TRAINING MANUALS-FIRE DEPT 22.50 25542 AMERICM~ RED CROSS -TEXTBOOKSIRESCUE MANIKIN RENTAL/vIDEOS/ 556.85 -LIFEGUARD COURSE FEEIVALVE/PDCKET MASK- POOL LESSONSIROUND LAKE BEACHES 25543 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC TRUCK STICKERS/PUBLICATIONS-WATER DEPT 80.95 25544 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY -COLORED COPY PAPER-DAY CAMP PROGRAM~{OUTH 274.50 -ATHLETI CS PROGRPJlI AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGR.AJ'l .7 25545 ANDER SONS GARDEN EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT/SOD-STREET MAINTEN~CE 4773574 \4S0~ ------- JULY 7,1992 25546 ANDON INC ~547 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC ~548 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING 25549 APPLE PAINTING INC 25550 APTUS 25551 ARMA INTL 25552 ARMOR SECURITY INC 25553 ASSN OF TRAINING OFFICERS 25554 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS 25555 B & STOOLS 25556 CHARLIE BAHN 25557 CRAIG BARES -HELIUM TANK & VALVE RENTAL-:;PECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM -BATTERIES/STREET SIGNS & PLATES-STREET DEPT WASTE DISPOSAL-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT -SERVICE-PAINTING RACQUETBALL COURTS- COMMUNITY CENTER -SERVICE-WASTE EVALUATION FOR ABP~DONED BARREL OUTSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER DUES-AI~INISTRATION -REKEYED LOCKS/INSTALLED COMBO LOCKS-FIRE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT WELL PUMP MOTOR PULLED & REPLACED-FRANLO P -MIRROR/SOCKETS/SAW BLADES/CHISELIWRENCHESI -DRILL CHUCKIBREAKER BAR/EXTENSION/PLIERS/ SOCKET HOLDER-EQUIPMENT MAINT/SEWER DEPT PLUG SOCKETS/PLIERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -SERVICE-PHOTOGRAPHERS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 25558 25559 25560 25561 25562 25563 25564 25565 PATRICA BARKER SCHooL-H~~ RESOURCES DEPT 8566 .567 25568 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC HOSE CLAMPSIBATTERIES-EQUIPMENT MAINT BAUER BUILT TIRE & SVC TIRES/O-RINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC COMPRESSOR SPRINGS & VALVES-COMMUNITY CTR BELL ATLANTIC TRlCON LEASING CORP JULY 92 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT JEFF BENDER BICYCLE MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID BETH BEUTELL EXPENSES-HISTORICAL & CULTUR4L COMMISSION BIFFS INC MAY 92 WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK ~~INTENANCE BRIAN BLANCH QUIT SMOKING PROGRAM-POLICE DEPT BLINDS & DESIGNS WINDOW BLINDS-FIRE DEPT BMB SERVICES -POWER EQUIPMENT MOVED & RE-INSTALLED FOR -ICE USE/INSTALLED TUNER FOR POOL & WEIGHT ROOM-COMMUNITY CENTER 25569 LOIS BOETTCHER -MINUTES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION/ PARK RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES CO~lli CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LK PARK SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 25570 25571 25572 25573 25574 25575 25576 25577 25578 25579 25580 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO LEE M BRANDT BRINGERS ED BRION BROADWAY AWARDS CHERIE BROWN BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SALES INC CANNON SPORTS INC CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS 25581 DAN CARLSON 25582 .JIM CARLSON LEASING CO 25583 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP CO ~84 CHEMLAWN ~85 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC 3624951 EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID PLAQUESITROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS MILEAGE-ROUND LAKE BEACHES GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE WASTE DISPOSAL-LIQUOR STORE WASHER FOR FIRE GEAR-FIRE DEPT TOYS & G~ES-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM -&~TENNAS/BRASS NUTS/CONNECTORS/KEYBOARD -REPAIR/COAXIAL CABLES/RADIO EQUIPMENT -& INSTALLATION/TELETYPE DEVICE FOR HEARING IMPAIRED-POLICE DEPT SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT CAR RENTAL-POLICE DEPT -BLADES/ROLLER/BRAKE SHOES/LINKS/PINS-PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT ~~INT LAYiN CARE-SENIOR CENTER OIL-WATER DEPT 30.44 128.94 50.00 900.00 540~00 130.00 501.58 65.00 3685.00 424.23 250.35 40.00 33.00 161.37 2727.32 660.00 358.68 184.00 45.64 2856.75 88.00 43.00 192.60 60.46 169.55 178.75 83.05 325.00 142.00 4.75 421.30 124.99 2650.00 403.73 13325.05 932.88 2200.00 834.65 110.25 187.20 JULY 7.1992 25586 JAMES CLARK JUNE 92 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 25587 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS -SERVICE-REMODELING CPT BLDG FOR CIVIC CTR 25588 COMM CENTER 25589 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO 25590 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 25591 COMPulERWARE DATA PRODUCTS INC 25592 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 25593 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC 25594 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC 25595 COPIER ALTERNATIVES 25596 COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS INC 25597 COPY EQUIPMENT INC 25598 JEFFREY CORDES 25599 CORNERSTONE ADVOCA~l SERVICE 25600 CORPOR;TE RISK MANAGERS INC 25601 CROWN ~~~KING INC 25602 CUSTOM HEADSETS INC 25603 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY 25604 DALeo 25605 GENE DAVIS 25606 DEPENDABLE GARAGE DOOR CO 25607 DAN DESAULNIERS 25608 DIVERSIFIED CLEANING SERVICES 25609 DPC INDUSTRIES INC 25610 THE DROZDAL COMPANY 25611 DUN & BR~DSTREET 25612 DYNA SYSTEMS 25613 EAGLE SIGN CO 25614 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 25615 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 25616 E P PHOTO 25617 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 25618 CITl OF EDINA 25619 ELIM MANAGEMENT SERVICE 25620 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC 25621 ENVIRO-TECH 25622 EPR INC 25623 HANS ERu~ 25624 DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS 9809051 -ANTENNAS/CABLES/CRIMPING CONNECTORS- EQUIPMENT MAINTENfu~CE ASPHALT-STREET MAINTENfu~CE -SERVICE-~~TERIAL TESTING & INSPECTION- VALLEY VIEW ROAD COMPUTER PAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER GLOVES-SAFETY DEPT SEALCOATING/SPR~YER ROD & TIP-STREET MAINT -GOGGLE REPLACEMENT LENSES/EXPOSURE CONTROL SPILL KIT-SAFETY DEPT -MAY 92 COPIER MAINTEN~J~CE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL FAX MACHINE INK CARTRIDGE-FIRE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK P~~~NING DEPT MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT -1ST QUARTER 92 SERVICE FOR BATTERED WOMEN~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT JUNE 92 INSURfu~C~ CONSULT&~T SERVICE NAMEPLATES/INSERTS-FIRE DEPT HEADSET EAR MOLD-FOLICE DEPT QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID -GARAGE DOOR INSTALLATION-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORES FLUORIDE-WATER DEPT -SERVICE-STRATEGIC PLANNING-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT WORD PERFECT REFERENCE BOOK-ADMINISTRATION DRILL BITS/WASHERS/NUTS & BOLTS-WATER DEPT SIGNS-LIQUOR STORE III -MAY 92 COPIER ~JAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/FIRE DEPT -GYM RENTAL-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT/ -EXPENSES-OUTDOOR CENTER/SENIOR CENTER/ . -COPIERS-SENIOR CENTERIROOM RENTAL- HISTORICAL & C~LTURAL COt1MISSION MAY 92 WATER TE3TS-WATER DEPT RELEASE ELIM SHORES TAX INCREMENT FUNDS -INSOLE CUSHI.oNSIHEARING PROTECTION MUFFS- SAFETY DEPT/STREET t1AHlT -SERVICE-CONSTRUCTION OF TIMBER EDGING- PARK MAINT WASTE DISPOSAL-PAR!. 11AINTENANCE -MAP & COMPASS mSTRUCTORIBACKPACKING TRIP GUIDE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION/HIGH SCHOOL LOCKER ROO~lS 200.00 26~¥ 170.93 56.81 49.83 58.36 2039.20 174.69 137.23 182.10 27.37 45.75 2000.00 700.00 401.56 34.90 6855.31 468.07 108.50 644.00 4_ 2~9~ 855.00 69.95 302.88 4087.85 800.66 17.00 93.22 4248.55 220.00 31409.37 67.29 750.00 350.37 175.00 105e8 25625 25626 25627 25628 .629 ESI COMMUNICATIONS INC ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC MICHAEL J FABINI FEED RITE CONTROLS INC 25630 FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO 25631 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES 25632 FIRST TECH COMPUTER 25633 FITZCO INC 25634 FLAGHOUSE INC 25635 FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB 25636 FLOYD SECURITY 25637 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25638 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS INC 25639 G T LAWN SERVICE 25640 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC 25641 KATHRYN M GARWOOD 25642 GATES ROOFING & SIDING 25643 GENERAL ELECTRIC MOBIL 25644 MICHAEL C GIBBONS • 645 JOSEPH GLEASON 646 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 5647 GOLD KEY SECURITY 25648 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 25649 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC 25650 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC 25651 HEAVENLY HAM 25652 LAURIE HELLING 25653 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 25654 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 25655 HERITAGE PRINT CENTER 25656 D C HEY COMPANY INC 25657 STEVE HIGLEY 25658 HOFFERS INC 25659 HOu~STEN ICE RINKS INC 25660 HONEYWELL INC 25661 HONEYWELL INC 25662 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES 25663 INDUSTRIAL LI GlUING SUPPLY INC .3828318 PHONE REPAIR-POLICE DEPT FRAl"1ES-SEWER DEPT POSTAGE-ADMINISTRATION DEPT SCHOOL-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT -SUCTION VALVE ASSEMBLY/SEAL RING/CERAMIC -BALL/FRAME-COMMUNITY CENTER/CHORINE-WATER DEPT GARBAGE BAGS-WATER DEPT TENNIS COURTS SEALCOATING-ROUND LAKE PARK -POWER CABLE/PRINTER CONNEC'TORS/SECURITY KIT/MOUSE PADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT -NEEDLE SYRINGE CONTAINMENT TUBES-POLICE DEPT -TOYS & GAMES-AFTERNOON & PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND/AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATION DEPT -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- LIQUOR STORE CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT PAINT-WATER DEPT -MAY & JUNE MOWING SERVICE-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY LIABILITY INSURANCE -SCHooLIMILEAGE/EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT -SERVICE-SIDING INSTALLATION-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM RADIO BASE STATIONS-POLICE DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID WATER CUPS-RACQUETBALL PROGRAM RE-ADJUST DOOR LOCK & LATCH-LIQUOR STORE MAY 92 SERVIE-UTILITIES DIVISION TIME DELAY RELAY-PARK t-lAINTENANCE -SERVICE-BOUNDARY & CONTROL SURVEY-MILLER PARK EXPENSES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SVCS COMMISSION MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION DEPT FILING FEES-PLANNING DEPT SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT BUSINESS REPLY CARDS-WATER DEPT -COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS-FIRE DEPT/ -STREET MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINTIUTILITIES DIVISION SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID FIELD MARKING PAINT-STREET MAINTENANCE COMPRESSOR OIL/DEGREASER-COMMUNITY CENTER -INSTRUMENTATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- WATER PLANT -PROCESS CONTROL EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-WATER DEPT -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREENENT- LIQUOR STORE Lfu~PS-WATER DEPT 1~<;oF 58.00 198.00 13.10 111.75 866.63 105.27 3062.50 130.00 29.19 552.87 43.15 328.77 232.45 119.06 530.00 3369.35 780.50 3245.00 4342.00 15.00 390.00 57.60 32.00 265.00 52.28 13383.50 55.00 45.75 353.75 228.35 101.59 356.96 606.00 585.00 167.34 1200.00 1765.20 441.31 63.96 .------------------------------------------- JULY 7.1992 25664 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC -REPLACED BLOCK HEATER/OIL & FILTER CHANGE/ 85.29 -SILICONE-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT/EQUIPMENT 2.6 MAINTIWATER DEPT 25665 INTEX CORP REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 25666 IPMA DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 80.00 25667 BRUCE ISAACS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 195.00 25668 GARY ISAACS -SOFTBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIAL COORDINATOR/ 971.25 FEES PAID 25669 JERRYS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 91.05 25670 JOHNSON ANDERSON INC ENVELOPES-CITY HALL 258.67 25671 JOHNSON CONTROLS -3RD QTR MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY 994.00 CENTER 25672 DAVID JOHNSON REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 11.08 25673 KEVIN & BARBARA JOHNSON -WINDOW WELLS/MASONRY NAILS-HOUSING 153.10 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 25674 JOHNS ANTIQUES -KEROSENE LIGHTING FIXTURES-CUMMINS GRILL 1425.00 HOMESTEAD RESTORATION 25675 KAYE CORPORATION WEED TRIMMER STRIANG-PARK t-1AINTENANCE 67.01 25676 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIATES STORAGE BENCH-COMMUNITY CENTER 498.26 25677 LINDA KLOECKNER -WINDOW PAINTING ADVERTISING FOR 4TH OF 165.00 .JULY CELEBRATION-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 25678 KENNETH W KOCH EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 45.34 25679 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC -BAT ANCHOR TOP/PITCHERS RUBBERS I 612.89 VOLLEYBALL NET/BALLFIELD LINER/BOCCE SET/ 25680 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1856.34 25681 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC -SPRINGS/ALTERNATOR/SWITCHIHORN BUTTON-184.58 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 25682 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE ~O 25683 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD MAY 92 PROSECUTION SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 8 8 25684 LANO EQUIPMENT INC PINSIWASHERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8 .58 25685 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LT MAY 92 LEGAL SERVICE-WETLAND PERMIT ISSUES 9623.38 25686 LAW ENFORCEMENT TV NETWORK JULY 92 TV NETWORK SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 388.00 25687 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC MAY 92 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 4283.78 25688 LIONS TAP GIFT CERTIFICATE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT 10.00 25689 THE LOFT -T-SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT/ 3523.65 -COMMUNITY CENTER STAFF/AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/TEEN WORK PROGRAM 25690 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC -BLADES/SWITCHIWASHERS/FRICTION DISCS-PARK 215.83 MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 25691 LUNDS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 32.27 25692 LYMAN LUMBER CO TIMBERS-STREET t1AINTENANCE 49.67 25693 LYONS SAFETY BARRICADE TAPE-WATER DEPT 96.70 25694 MACARTHUR CO OUTER DOOME-FLYING CLOUD ATHLETIC FIELDS 220.00 25695 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC -SEALS/KEYS/SCREWS~10UNTING PIN/SPRINGS/ 437.69 TARP RAIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 25696 RODERICK MACRAE EXPENSES/t1ILEAGE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 124.10 25697 MATRX MEDICAL INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 108.90 25698 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS -TYPESETTING-FLYERS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 204.00 COMMISSION/4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION 25699 CARLSTON B MCKENZIE III SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 390.00 25700 MCLAGAN TEMPS INC SERVICE-ENGINEERING DEPT 800.00 25701 MCNEILUS STEEL INC STEEL PLATE-EQU I PMENT t1AINTENANCE 1192.39 25702 A t1EAT SHOPPE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT .~ 25703 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN/KEYS-FIRE DEPT 3876291 !4S0b- JULY 7,1992 25704 STEVE MEEKER MILEAGE-ROUND LAKE MARINA 9.50 25705 MENARDS -LUMBERITREATED TIMBERS/GATESIWEB BELT/ 446.07 • -CRESCENT WRENCH/SPRAY PAINT/PLIERS/LINE/ -SPRING DOOR/SQUAREITARPS/GARBAGE CAN/ -HAMMERS/SCREWDRIVER SETS/CRACK FILLER- STREET MAINT/PARK MAl NT/LIQUOR STORE 25706 METRO SALES INC -COPIER-CITY HALLITONER/DEVELOPER-2137.81 RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 25707 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL POOL BOILER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 111. 70 25708 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM MAY 92 SAC CHARGES 72765.00 25709 JASON MEYER MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 72.13 25710 MID-CO SECURITY SYSTEMS INC -MICROPHONE WINDSCREEN INSTALLATION-POLICE 57.25 DEPT 25711 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO STEEL PLATE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 69.65 25712 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP ASPHALT-STREET MAINTENANCE 2976.90 25713 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ 637.77 SENIOR CENTER 25714 MIDWEST VIDEO SERVICE VCR REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 88.99 25715 MINNCOt1l1 PAGING JUNE PAGER SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 52.73 25716 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 578.37 25717 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS BUSINESS CARDS-FINANCE DEPT/STREET MAINT 77.76 25718 t1N CHAPTER lAAI DUES-POLICE DEPT 10.00 25719 t1N DEPT OF REVENUE LICENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 270.00 25720 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER MAY 92 BUILDING SURCHARGES 5283.47 25721 MINNESOTA TROPHIES -PLAQUE BRASS PLATES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/ 404.11 FIRE DEPT 25722 R E MOONEY & ASSOCIATES INC PAINT-WATER DEPT 149.07 .723 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 379.49 724 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO WATER PUMP ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT ~ffiINTENANCE 215.06 725 MUNICILITE CO -WHELEN RESPONDER SPOT LIGHTS-EQUIPMENT 460.39 MAINT 25726 MPELRA DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 75.00 25727 NAME BRAND SPORTS -T-SHIRTSITANK TOPS-EQUIPMENT t1AINTENM~CE/ 1390.46 UTILITIES DIVISION 25728 NATL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 34.20 25729 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-PLANNING DEPT 372.68 25730 JAN NELSON -MINUTES-PARK RECREATION & NATURAL 300.00 RESOURCES COHMIHUMAN RI GHTS & SVS COMM 25731 BETH NILSSON SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 1908.42 25732 NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL SUP PAPER TOWELS-SEWER DEPT 160.12 25733 NYSTROM INC MESH LOCKERS-FIRE DEPT 2654.00 25734 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT-SEWER DEPT 76.68 25735 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC TOOL BOXES/PIPE RACKS-UTILITIES DIVISION 1487.40 25736 SCOTT OMMEN MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 41.00 25737 HARRY ORTLOFF SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 211.25 25738 DON OVERBEY EXPENSES/t1ILEAGE-FIRE DEPT 106.32 25739 PAS SONS SPORTS -BADMINTON SET/BIRDIES/BALL NETS-AFTERNOON 152.29 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 25740 PEAK STAFFING INC -MINUTES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM/BLUFF 780.00 OOMMITTEEIHISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 25741 PEPSI COLA COMPANY SUPPLIES-BEACH CONCESSIONS/SKATING RINKS 798.9C 25742 PERSONNEL POOL SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE 2294.0C 25743 PICHA GREENHOUSE BEDDING PLANTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 1700.2f: .744 PIONEER MIDWEST INC COUPLER VALVES/KEY-WATER DEPT 64.91 745 PIP PRINTING FORMS-STREET MAINTENANCE 139.3C 10200046 IL(~) \1 .JULY 7,1992 25746 PITNEY BOWES INC POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY PALL/POLICE DEPT 242.25 25747 PLANT EQUIPMENT INC -FRICTION CONES/PACKING SETS/GASKETSjPLUG-_1 WATER DEPT 25748 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT CO GEAR BOX FOR BUTTERFLY VALVE-ylATER DEPT 1 . 0 25749 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -INSTALLED MOUNTED RECEPTACLES FOR 2133.85 -PITCHING r1ACHINES-FLYING CLOUD FIELDS/ WIRED POOL PUMP-COMMUNITY CENTER 25750 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN -FIBERGLASS FRONT PANEL/CHAIN/CABLE/GAS 194.39 -CAPIWHEEL/GRIP/OIL/LINE/CONES/PLUGS- -POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT/PARK MAINT/WATER DEPT 25751 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING -DIRECTORY-COMMUNITY SVS DEPT/ENVELOPES/ 527.17 FORMS-POLICE DEPT 25752 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LTD PARTNERSHIP RELEASE PV APTS TAX INCREMENT FUNDS 64607.27 25753 PRENTICE HALL INC PUBLICATION-FIRE DEPT 40.37 25754 THE PROMOTION GROUP -INCENTIVE AWARDS-SAFETY DEPT/HUMAN 103.34 RESOURCES DEPT 25755 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC -REPAIR & INSPECT HOISTSILEAK DETECTOR/ 767.20 GASKETS/SEALS/VALVE CORES-EQUIPMENT MAINT 25756 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 90.80 25757 RAINBOW FOODS -EXPENSES-CITY HALLIROUND & RILEY LAKE 272.84 BEACHES/OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRfu~ 25758 REAL GEM JEWELRY & AWARDS LAPEL PINS-HUMfu~ RESOURCES DEPT 697.57 25759 REFEREE SUBSCRIPTION-OP~~~IZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM 29.95 25760 SCOTT REIN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 682.50 25761 JEAN S REPLINGER -50/50 OUTING CLUB SPEAKER-OUTDOOR CTR 50.00 PROGIWlIFEES PAID 25762 RETAIL FOODS OF MINNESOTA EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT .~ 25763 MARK A RINGERUD -GOLF INSTRUCTOR-SPRING SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM/FEES PAID 25764 RITZ CAMERA -FIIl1/Flill PROCESSING-FORESTRY DEPT/ 67.51 PLANNING DEPT/OUTI;OOR CENTER 25765 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO -REPLACED LEAKING HOSE IN TOWER & BOOM-111.34 EQU I Pl1ENT t1AI NTENANCE 25766 THE S T ROBB CO CLEA1HNG SUPPLIES-HATER DEPT 36.27 25767 ROLLINS OIL CO DIESEL FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 13258.98 25768 R T ROOFING -REPLACED ROOF-HOUSING REHABILITATION 5990.00 PROGRfu~ 25769 RYANS RUBBER STPl1PS STAMPS-LIQUOR STORE 44.73 25770 RYAN CONSTRUCTION REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 80.19 25771 S & M BUILDERS -REPLACED STORM HINOOW/SIDING/INSTALLED 6353.84 -GUTTERS/INSULATED ATTIC/INSTALLED PATIO -DOOR & TRIM-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 25772 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS -TOYS & GAMES-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM/ 1522.31 DAY CAMP 25773 SA-AG INC MORTAR SAND-Hot1EHARD HILLS PARK 5757.77 25774 SANCO INC -CLEM~ING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR/3 FLOOR 2284.74 SCRUBBER MACHINES-FIRE DEPT 25775 KEVIN SCHt1IEG MAY & JUNE EXPENSES-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT 400.00 25776 CARRIE SCHULBERG SCHOOLIMILEAGE/EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 1011.96 25777 WILBUR SCHULTZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 491.25 25778 RON SCHULTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 142.50 25779 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT .~ 25780 SEARS SANDING BELTS/BELT SANDER-COMMUNITY CENTER 10897196 lLt~JI ~----- JULY 7.1992 25781 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC SERVICE-COMPUTER SOFTWARE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 54.00 ':'5782 SIGN A RAMA USA DECALS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENA1~CE 71.75 .783 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC FIRE DEPT LOGO EMBROIDERY-FIRE DEPT 36.00 784 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER -LETTERHEAD-SAFETY DEPT/FLYERS-HISTORICAL 1363.20 & CULTURAL COMMISSION 25785 THE SKETCH PAD LABELS-FINANCE DEPT 138.07 25786 RANDY L SLICK SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEFf 255.05 25787 GARREN D SMELTZE MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 15.25 25788 KARY SMITH SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 204.75 25789 S~lITH & NEPHEW ROLYAN INC BUOY MARKERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 311.63 25790 TOM SOPCZYK SERVICE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 106.73 25791 SOUTHSIDE LAWN CARE ROADWAY MOWING SERVICE-STREET MAINTEANCE 623.03 25792 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE CO~1ISSI 3RD QTR 92 OPERATING BUDGET 4600.07 25793 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 154.88 25794 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-ADMINISTRATION 505.83 25795 SW TRAILS ASSOCIATION REHmURSEMENT FOR SOUTl-MEST TRAILS 1319.36 25796 SPECIALTY CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-TRAIL RESTORATION-ROBERT DR 400.00 25797 SPORTS TECHNOLOGY INC UTILITY HOOK-COMMUNITY CENTER 14.47 25798 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/FIRE DEPT/wATER 299.70 DEPT 25799 STAT-MEDICAL INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 157.92 25800 OOUGLAS D STEEN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 263.75 25801 OON STENSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 15.00 25802 STERLING GROUP INC SERVICE-CPT ACQUISITION PHASE 17075.00 25803 VINCE STOCKEL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 177.50 25804 STRAND MFG CO INC IMPELLOR PULLER/IMPELLORS-SEWER DEPT 258.67 25805 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -BALLISTIC VESTS & OUTERSHELL/OOOR OPENING 4342.52 • -TOOLS/CHEMICAL TESTING BOXES/~JNITION/ -GRILLE & DECK LIGHTS/DASH LIGHTS/MIRROR -ASSEMBLIES/SLIDING CENTER SECTION-POLICE I I DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 692.19 I 25806 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -VALVE ASSEMBLY/IGNITION MODULE & COIL/ -REGULATORITANK ASSEMBLY/ADAPTER/GASKET/ -SENSORIHANDLE ASSEMBLY/SPRING/OOOR LOCKS/ DOOR HINGES LUBRICATED-EQUIPMENT MAINT 25807 SUHMER HILL TREE FARM INC -TREES-SUNRISE CIRCLE IMPROVEMENTS/CEDAR 995.00 RIDE & CORRAL LANE IMPROVEMENTS 25808 SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION -MODULAR COMPUTER SYSTEM/SOFTWARE EDGE 19114.25 ADAPTERS FOR ENGINE ANALYZER-EQUIPMENT MAINT 25809 NATALIE SWAGGERT JUNE 92 EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 205.15 25810 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 80.00 25811 TANK RE-NU OF MINNESOTA GAS TANK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 120.00 25812 TAPE DISTRIBUTORS OF MN VHS TAPES-POLl CE DEPT 55.29 25813 TECHNIFLOW CORPORATION RAINSTOPPER MANHOLE COVERS-WATER DEPT 416.52 25814 KATHY TEKIELA -OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR/FEES 90.00 PAID 25815 STAN TEKIELA OUTOOOR CENTER PROGIW1 INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 70.00 25816 CHRIS THOMPSON REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 78.02 25817 JEANE THORNE INC SERVICE 99.00 25818 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC LIMBERS/SPIKES-HOMEWARD HILLS PARK 1965.73 25819 TIMS TOWER SERVICE -RADIO COMMUNICATIONS TOWER & INSTALLATION 18621.80 POLICE DEPT .820 TRIARCO P..RTS & CRAFTS INC -TOYS/GAMES/CRAFT SUPPLIES-PRESCHOOL 1321.26 PLAYGROUND/AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/DAY CAMP v821 E JOHN TROMBLEY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 227.50 7691584 {L150J JULY 7.1992 251322 CALEB TRUAX 25823 TWIN CITY Ox~GEN CO 251324 U S AQUATICS 25825 UNITED LABOF~TORIES INC 251326 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 25827 UNIVERSITY OF 5T THO~A5 258213 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 25829 BRENDA UTING 25830 VALERIES FRESH FLOWERS 25831 VALLEY SPORTS 25832 SUSAN VAN S~~T 25833 VESSCO INC 25834 VIKING LABORATORIES INC 25835 VISION ENERGY 251336 WALTERS SWIM SUPPLIES INC 25837 WARNING LITES OF MN INC 25838 WATER PRODUCTS CGt1PANY 25839 WEST SUBURBll.J.~ MEDIATION CENTER 25840 WEST WELD 25841 YALE INC 251342 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 25843 BRAD ZIOLA 25844 PAUL & NICOLE ZIVALICH 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 11000 NATIONAL CITY BANK 11000 NORWEST BANK I1N NA 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 25109 VOID OUT CHECK 25127 VOID OUT CHECK 25145 VOID OUT CHECK 25151 VOID OUT CHECK 25293 VOID OUT CHECK 25338 VOID OUT CHECK 25365 VOID OUT CHECK 27500387 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID -OXGEN/ACETYLENE/CARBON DIOXIDE-EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER WADING POOL IMPROVEMENTS-COMMUNITY CTR LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT -EXPENSES-STRATEGIC PLANNING-HUMP.N RESOURCES DEPT BOLTS FOR BARRICADE FLASHER-STREET DEPT MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENSES-CITY HALL UNIFORMS-POOL OPERATIONS -GRAPHIC ART & PAINT SUPPLIES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION TACHOMETER-WATER DEPT CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER PROPANE CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER EQUIPMENT TOTEMASTER-COMMUNITY CENTER REFLECTIVE VESTS-SAFETY DEPT -GASKETS/BOLTS/SEAL TUBES/CEMENTIREMOTE -READERS/FLANGE LOCK RINGS/TUBING CUTTER- UTILITIES DIVISION 1ST QUARTER 92-CO~~UNITY SERVICES DEPT -GAS CAP/CHIPPING HAMMER/ANTI-SPL~TTER FAN TIPS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -SOLENOID COIL & VALVE/AIR COMPRESSOR REPAIR-WATER DEPT -1ST AID SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINT/wATER DEPT SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID CARPET-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS PAYROLL-MAY 22-1992 PAYROLL-5/29/92 PAYROLL 6/12/92 PAYROLL-6/12/92 SPECIAL PAYROLL 6/19/92 MAY 1992 SALES TAX JUNE 92 EST SALES TL\X 31.00 1·98 8 .00 396.06 975.01 494.70 36.80 45.62 44.75 18.00 1141.56 193.72 628.74 160.71 459.75 164.73 652.69 375.00 107.79 1064.08 1 00 1 .00 180.47 4329.21 6540.00 163173.00 15823.98 4473.00 14493.38 4473.00 1191.55 26246.90 28000.00 2159.11 24.50 361.20 0.00 44.50 7262.00 160.00 $1057624.20 • • DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 18 GENERAL 20 CEHETERY OPERATIONS 22 STATE AID CONST 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 37 92 COMMUNITY CTR ADDITION 39 86 FIRE STATION CONST 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 47 89 RECREATION REFUNDING 52 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND 60 IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 73 WATER FUND 77 SEHER FUND 79 RALF 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 87 CDBG FUND 89 CL~INS GRILL PRINTS 92 TIF PV APARTMENTS $1057624.20 • • 479894.30 46967.43 40724.66 31102.47 6546.81 530.00 56.81 5917.69 5749.00 10883.50 163088.00 279.21 10675.00 995.00 53976.45 75625.12 1543.51 9059.39 16568.21 1425.00 96016.64 ,-1" I " . • • • !~Sl .. " . JOEY OMLlE, D.D.S. @ P YO-U ~'n.:C t1JI c:JJ-~ [JyJ.J:.j~ .10.)(.£) /<lA cf£ u/, , , . 0 U , ... ./ () ---}VJ(,WV .L"Jj ~ -jutjJJ (uJVL..C/L ~D.Jj ... /fVj'-<.J..U. -' (jJ) ~)\.:l.-~.tf' ~J...,.'4-i_AJ JLO....4f)~rtt.!2/)I{ .. --C.; ,../V-u../LthY.AJ 'J\Jl-£tI.;U:./-t.::) (() I 0 !J __ .\ r)..QcLu ~!L~,yttv 1<L ~/.-() .<l/JVI~y:U r~ .... /MCLdU .A.DC~rLJ" C uk" ...,LUG---,ct... ...JJj ~~ .JUJ Dr)<.) ~I~ OJ f..A-~lL ,~"1-L:) @'j PjL6-~ T)li.,1Ct.. . CO d-u-0 ;,(u \f-.I;w .4'UL-ffl0 JJAd.L. ceo u..ft;L ~GU ~-blJv.-rlcL "YV)';~uJ .!lJJt,~ ~'/-JJt:.CC vU.;'€.. ~ u.)()./p..,t J.-oJ\..Q./nl$tH __ )~ .::J~ ~ L0D~ ~cLXoJttJ~ I , , ·c • c . • l ( - • • • 6-11-92 SUMMARY OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS REVIEW ON OMLIE'S DECK VARIANCE REQUEST: Construct a deck 8~ feet from Bryant Lake; Code requies a 100 foot setback. MOTION: A motion was made and seconded to approve the deck with a 85 foot setback due to the lot's given restrictions of t~well location and a sanitary sewer easement. Further noting that the new house was placed further back from the lake than the previous house. The motion failed 2:2:1 Anderson, Wilkus: aye Harvey, Freemyer: nay Weeks abstained Reasons for the nay votes were: -house has 2 patios and an area for a deck without a variance. -the house design and placement on the lot was self-imposed. -there remains reasonable use of the lot and house. Subrni tted by: Jean Johnson, Staff to the BOA I C. L . i_" 1 __ I J __ J..:.1 I ( June 11, 1992 Jean Johnson zoning Administrator 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 _ U [I ... _ -! RE: MARK AND JOANN OMLIE VARIANCE, #92-013, BRYANT LAKE (27- 67P), CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Ms. Johnson: Metro Region Waters has reviewed the submitted information (received June 11, 1992) regarding the MarK and Joann Omlie proposal to place a deck within 88' of the ordinary high water elevation of Bryant Lake. We do not object to the proposed variance based on the tollowing considerations: 1. The average distance of the primary structures on thalots adjacent to the Omlie lot appears to be less than 88' from the OHW of Bryant Lake (27-67P). The JUly 1989 update of 'the State Shoraland Management Standards allows structure setbacks to be altered without a variance to conform to the adjoining lots if structures exist on both the adjoining lots (see 6120.3300, Subpart 3, A., 2). 2. The proposed deck is not within the 50' shore impact zone of Bryant Lake (27-67P). ' 3. The deck is built primarily of WOOd, and is not roofed or screened. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Should you have a question regarding these comments contact me, or staft Hydrologist Joe Richter, at 772-7910. Sincerely, Ceil strauss Area Hydrologist cc: Ed Fick, Shoreland Hydrologist City of Eden Prairie Shoreland File Bryant Lake (27-67P) File AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I!MPLOYEA ,u<: (~ I 'v \y • • • c. • • Board of Adjustments & Appeals done in a timely manner. 6-11-92 Unapproved Weeks suggested that the 180 day time frame be allowed for each phase. Wilkus seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Anderson suggested an amendment to state that all construction materials should be removed from the yard. She asked about a bond instead of the fine. Johnson noted that it is a difficult situation to work on private property and that the fine approach would be preferable. Wilkus seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Request #92-013 bv Mark and Joan Omlie of 6661 Beach Road to penn it a deck to be constructed 85 feet from Brvant Lake's Ordinarv High \-Vater Level. Code requires 100 feet. Section 11.50. Subdivision 6., B. Mark Omlie appeared to present the variance request. He said he and his wife have lived here since May of 1981. They tore down the existing home last October and built a new one. The property has a 25' sanitary sewer easement. He is asking for an additional 10-12' variance from code. A precedence already set in the area is the Shaver residence for a tennis court and the Holmen residence for a boat house. Lake Minnetonka set back is 75'. He does not understand why Bryant Lake has a 100' setback. He requests the acceptance of the variance as presented in the packet. Johnson noted that she had received a letter from the DNR today. They do not object. The deck would not be within the 50' shore impact zone of Bryant Lake. She referred the Board to the letter for further information. The hardship could be that there is a well in front of the home and that there is a wide sanitary sewer easement. She had received one letter in support of the request and no objections. Weeks choose to abstain. Wilkus and Anderson had no questions. Freemyer asked if the house location was determined by the location of the well. Omlie answered yes, that they had no city water and he would like to leave room for a pool, considering the mil foil situation on the lake. He had realized he needed a variance this spring when they did the landscaping plans. The house had been positioned to save the well. Freemyer noted that lakes go sour because of stress. He asked if Omlie would feel comfortable reducing the variance. Omlie noted that he was not building the pool now--just the deck. The • size is not exhorbatent and there are other precedents on the lake already. They would be back further than they were before with the old structure. The old home was 8-10 feet closer to the lake than the new one. Harvey suggested that the deck go further south, the point be removed and square footage be added to the side. Omlie said that there were pine trees in that area. Johnson said that the square footage of the proposed deck was appr.16x 20 feet. Harvey had questions regarding a four season porch. Omlie said he was not sure about that at this time. Harvey said the contractor must have known what the setback was. He felt that the landscaper had designed the variance. He asked if there was any way to get the square footage on the deck and still and stay within the setback. Omlie said that there probably is, but he would like the request approved at it is. He is limited by the sewer easement. Harvey noted that this is not a condition that exists today. The use • of the property is not being harmed. This is a functional house. There are alternatives. Omlie said that precedents have already been set and neither the neighbors nor the DNR have objections. Freemyer said that this is a self inflicted problem. Dianna Waterbury came forward and said that she is a neighbor that lives to the south. She said that she can see Omlie's problem with the view from the deck. If it were to be put on the south where Harvey suggested, they would view a huge pine tree and her house. She has no problem with the request and would recommend that it be granted. MOTION: Anderson moved that Variance Request 92-013 be granted for a deck that goes beyond code requirement of 100'. The placement is limited by sewer and well locations which restrict the options. She noted that the proponent was respectful of code when he built the home and that it is in compliance. The property has been improved. Wilkus seconded the motion. Freemyer noted that he did not feel that is was the sewer easement that caused the problem and that this is a self inflicted wound. vote: In favor of variance: Anderson, Wilkus. Against variance: Freemyer, Harvey.Abstaining: Har~ey note~ that in ti~ situations, the variance is denled. He lnformed O~lle that the request was denied and that he rad ~he rlght to appeal to the Council I ~~'~/ 1 .2... . • Weeks. • • • MR. AND MRS. GERALD J. BLISS 6621 Beach Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 June 2, 1992 Ms. Jean Johnson Zoning Administrator Eden Prairie City Offices 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 Re: Variance: #92-013 Location: 6661 Beach Road Applicant: Mark and Joann Omlie Dear Ms. Johnson: I received your Notice of Public Hearing regarding the proposed variance requested by Mark and Joann Omlie. As you can see by the address, we live two lots over from the Omlie's, and we would like to see the variance for their deck approved. Gerald J. Bliss GJB/mg • • • T-HUItDERIIRD AVIAT;ON ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5100 Eden Avenue • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436 Phone (612) 926-1671 June 24, 1992 Mr. Carl Jullie, City Manager City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: This letter is our request to be included on the agenda of the July 7, 1992 City Council meeting. Our main objective is to brief council members and the Mayor on the status of the airport as seen by the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission. We also request time to prompt council members to ask questions and for our Committee to reply to those questions. If you should have any questions of our request please feel free to call me at 941-1212. Yours very truly, J~on: Flying Act~ng Chairman JO:ljs Cloud Airport Advisory Commission cc: Tim Ashenfelter Kent Barker Andrew Detroi John P. Dow Scott Kipp Gary Schmidt Bill Turkula Flying Cloud Airport 14091 Pioneer Trail l:/'Sq Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55343 Phone: (612) 941-1212 Cf(J(JlT, 1r.J.L SVWlU A!lwkolt ~ Sales • Flight Instruction Rental • Charter • Service FOX, McCUE & COMPANY, P.A. JOHN E. FOX, C.P.A. WIUJAM M. McCUE, C.PA JOHN J. BRAND, C.PA DAN C. KIND, C.PA CERTIRED PUBUC ACCOUNTANTS 250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 FAX(612)9~8496 June 30, 1992 To the Mayor and City Council City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota Dear Mayor Tenpas and City Council: EDEN PRAIRIE (612) 944-6166 BELLE PlAINE (612) 445-6693 In connection with our audit of the City's 1991 financial statements, we would like to provide the following comments and recommendations regarding the finan- cial statements and system of internal control: Financial Statement Matters Capital Project Deficits Our prior year letter to you addressed concerns about large cash deficits that existed in the Utility, Capital Equipment and Public Improvement Capital Project Funds, as well as certain other funds. As a result of bond issuances during 1991, these deficits have been largely diminished. It is important to note that deficits can and do occur from time to time in the governmental accounting model since expenditures sometimes preceed the necessary funding. At December 31, 1991 we have noted that deficits presently exist in the various construction, debt service and trust funds, but it appears that bonding authority, tax levies and other alotments will be sufficient to elimi- nate such deficits in the future. General Fund The portion of the fund balance of the General Fund which has not been reserved or otherwise designated is $2,235,177 at December 31, 1991. This represents 14% of the 1992 projected expenditure level. This is considered reasonable. We have noted through confirmations from Hennepin County that abatements of property tax levies over the last two years were approximately $637,000. This amount does not include any delinquent tax payments, which for taxes payable in 1991, was another $434,000. These conditions indicate the volatility of the property tax collection process, and it is imperative for the finance department to adjust its budget forecasts accordingly. -2- The General Fund budget has historically included capital outlay expenditures for various departments, as well as reserves for other property acquisitions, such as a City Hall and a public works storage facility. These capital outlays represent approximately 10% of the overall General Fund budget for both 1991 and 1992. Consideration should be given to appropriating such items in a separate Special Revenue or Capital Projects Fund in order to reduce the year-to-year fluctuations that can occur when capital outlay expenditures are intertwined with the General Fund operations. Utility Enterprise Fund The Utility Fund user rates for water and sewer appear reasonable based on the volume experienced in 1991. We have a continuing concern relating to the ongoing confusion of utility service provided to the Washington Avenue area customers. A liability has been accrued annually, payable to the City of Edina, for amounts billed to these customers by Eden Prairie; however, Edina purportedly is providing the actual water and sewer service. At December 31, 1991, the liability is approximately $500,000. We suggest that this situation be resolved. Until then, the liquidity of the Utility Fund should be moni- tored since its cash position would be greatly affected upon resolution of this matter. Cash Flow Projections -Public Improvement Debt Service Funds In light of the City's expected growth needs in terms of public improvement facilities, the issue of cash flow becomes extremely important. We have noted that the finance director has projected future cash flows with regard to special assessment public improvement projects and repayment of existing special assessment bond obligations. These projections indicate that assessment collections may be insufficient over the next several years as a result of the uncertainty of the collection of deferments and the size of the debt service payments occurring in this time frame; as such, property tax levies or interfund borrowings may be required in the short-term to accumulate the necessary resources to ensure the repayments to the bondholders. The possibility exists for excess funds to be on hand at the conclusion of the debt service stream; however, at this point it is premature to gauge this amount. Cash Reserves -Utility System The City has accumulated cash balances of $11 million with respect to the Utility Debt Service Fund for non-arbitrage bond issues (pre-1978), whose bond principal at December 31, 1991 is $8,260,000 at interest rates ranging from 4.0% to 6.2%. Additional cash reserves of $11 million have been accumulated in the Capital Projects Utility Reserve Fund for purposes of future utility construction needs and debt service requirements for post-1978 bond issues. These conditions indicate that the method of financing the utility system (using a combination of supplementals, hook-up fees, and quarterly user charges) has enabled the City to be appropriately positioned to review its financing alternatives with respect to the completion of the trunk system, especially in the undeveloped southwest quadrant of the community, and the repayment of the associated revenue bonds. -3- Internal Control Matters The following suggestions were not considered reportable conditions, which are defined as significant deficiencies in the City's internal accounting control which would affect the ability to properly summarize and report financial data. Reportable conditions concerning accounting over property and equipment and the capital project reporting system were addressed in our separate report on inter- nal control structure. Arbitrage Regulations The City has issued bonds subject to complex arbitrage rebate rules, as established by the 1986 Tax Reform Act. The IRS has since published numerous regulations regarding the computations to be made under the rules. It is important for the City to monitor its compliance with the rebate rules, which are designed to restrict the amount of investment earnings on bond proceeds and debt service sinking funds. Specifically, the City should ensure that it maintains accountability for each affected bond issue and that the rebate calculations are performed on a timely basis (minimum once every five years). Compliance is necessary in order to obtain your financing on a tax-exempt basis. We suggest that arbitrage computations be prepared on applicable bond issues in order to begin segregating these amounts for future remittance to the IRS. Consideration should be given to segregating investments of bond proceeds and debt service sinking funds from the overall investment pool. An estimate of the City's arbitrage rebate liability was made as of December 31, 1991 and it was not determined to be material to the financial presentation of the Debt Service Fund. Federal Grant Administration The City is the recipient of pass-through federal grant program monies. These grant programs require the City to meet certain administrative guidelines. We did not note any reportable conditions or questioned costs in our audit with regard to the administration of the grant programs. However, we would recom- mend that the City investigate or have awareness of the following items: The Federal Emergency Management Agency civil defense grant programs are reimbursement-type programs for personnel-related costs. l~ile we were able to obtain comfort with respect to the actual achievement of program objectives, the specific recording on the time sheets of the hours spent by employees should be considered for all such programs. For purposes of tracking CDBG program expenditures, we suggest incor- porating appropriate general ledger codes so that they can be more easily tied into the particular program year and expense category as shown on the warrant requests issued to the County. The CDBG program occasionally receives repayment of previous housing reha- bilitation loans as a result of a property sale. We recommend that such amounts be handled through a clearing account as opposed to the present treatment as revenue/expenditures. -4- Budgeting We noted an increased emphasis by the Finance Department in 1991 regarding the development of the annual budget document, together with budget monitoring and reports to the City Council. We recommend that the staff consider a written budget policy by which the state statutory guidelines on budgeting are supple- mented with other formalities of the budgeting process, such as which funds are budgeted, type of budget (calendar year, program period, project length), authority for line-item and departmental budget transfers or additional appropriations, and the monitoring process. Such a policy would then form the basis for the City's required budgetary data disclosures in the comprehensive annual financial report. We recommend that the following Special Revenue Fund activities be considered for development of an approved annual budget: Pleasant Hills Cemetery opera- tions and its capital requirements; and Drug Forfeiture Funds. We also recommend that the budget for the tax increment district (as shown in the supplementary section in the financial statements) be amended for the improvements that are contemplated in the resolutions adopted by the council during 1990. The TIF budget should be monitored to consider the effects of decreased tax increments as a result of property devaluations, as well as the importance of the "timing" of expected expenditures (which materially impacts the investment income budget item). Purchasing The purchasing policy developed in late 1989 has had two years of implemen- tation experience. The finance department staff has assumed the respon- sibility for processing and tracking purchase order activity, and this appears to work effectively. We have noted through discussions (and observed at least one test item) whereby purchases have been fragmented in order to avoid the $200 threshold for purchase order generation. While it is difficult to ascer- tain how widespread this type of occurrence is, there is an indication that certain personnel either lack the appreciation for the purpose of the policy, that disciplinary measures should be stiffened, or possibly the $200 threshold could be increased without any significant reduction in purchasing control. Our recommendation would be to revise the purchasing policy threshold to be possibly $400, with written refinements to the existing policy (which is pre- sently a one-page document) to outline acceptable procedures for blanket orders, and to ensure that the effects of the new sales tax regulations are appropriately communicated to employees. Special Assessments We encountered some difficulties in tracing the Council-approved special assessments to the certifications provided to Hennepin County. We recommend that the "Exhibit A", which provides a parcel-by-parcel breakdown of project costs, be updated for all public hearing adjustments and that it be marked as "FINAL" for purposes of levy certification. We also recommend that the interest and prepayment dates contained in the resulting City Council resolu- tion be in agreement with actual practice. The engineering department, with assistance from the finance department, has identified exclusions and defer- ments on computerized reports, but care should be taken to be consistent and specific in tracking the nature and terms of these items. We recommend that whenever Council decisions are made which affect the status of amounts of spe- cial assessments, that such decisions be communicated to both the special assessments clerk and the finance department. -5- Accounting and Reporting The City has submitted its comprehensive annual financial report to the Government Finance Officer's Association for purposes of obtaining a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. This demonstrates the City's pursuit and commitment to the highest standards in government accounting and reporting. Although the status of the certificate issuance will not be known for some time, such an attempt is noteworthy and the staff is commended for seeking a higher standard in its reporting respon- sibilities. Property and Equipment We recommend that the individual responsible for maintaining the property and equipment listing ensure that asset descriptions be as detailed as possible in order to allow for better accountability, especially for purposes of per- forming future physical counts. Lawful Gambling The City adopted a local gambling ordinance in 1989 which, among other things, assesses a 1% gambling tax on licensed operators for reimbursement of costs attributed to law enforcement efforts. Time devoted to enforcing gambling laws should be documented for purposes of supporting the use of proceeds from the local tax. An annual report to the State Gaming Board should be submitted every March 15th. At December 31, 1991, approximately $10,000 had been collected from the 1% tax. We noted that reports and tax remittances from one licensed operator was not always received on a timely basis. We recommend that the appropriate follow- up procedures and courses of action be designed to handle delinquent tax remittances so that the required reports are filed on a timely basis. Employee Benefits We noted three instances where unused compensatory time exceeded the 40 hour cumulative amount as outlined in the personnel policy manual. The payroll clerk will be following up on these exceptions in 1992. The City's total health care premiums were $678,000 in 1991, of which 22%, or $147,000, was shared by employees. The 1991 premiums borne by the City increased 25% over the 1990 level. State law requires a bid on group insurance every five years, and such bid will be required in 1992. Cost Allocations The City incurs various charges which may relate to several functions; for example, liability and property insurance premiums are attributable to general fund activities as well as liquor and utility operations. We recommend that the finance department challenge the appropriateness of cost allocations, especially in the areas of fringe benefits, vehicle maintenance, the community center and insurance, in order to ensure that the present allocations are reasonable. -6- We appreciated the cooperation of City staff in assisting us with the audit pro- cess. We hope that you find the above comments to be useful in your understanding of the City's operations. Please contact us with any questions that you may have. • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~ DATE: June 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Review of Preliminary Grading Plan for Miller Park The final survey and topography has been prepared for Miller Park and the preliminary grading plan has been completed. City staff have invited presidents of the Hockey, Soccer, Football, Baseball and Softball Associations to review this preliminary plan prior to the final grading plan that will be advertised for bid. City staff are requesting the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to also review this preliminary grading plan and the recommendations of staff regarding changes to this plan that are required based on the new information provided with the final survey and topography detail. Issues that must be addressed include the following: 1. Final survey indicates that the park is actually 60' narrower on the west boundary than originally anticipated. This puts the hockey rink within 20' of the west boundary and the western most parking lot within the woods and a shallower vain. City staff are recommending eliminating the hockey rink from the site plan and adding a hockey and skating rink to the Rice Marsh Lake Neighborhood Park to serve this quadrant of the community. Staff believe it is important to maintain the wooded fringe on the western boundary as a natural barrier from residents in that area to the lighted soccer fields. Staff also believe it is important to try to maintain as much of the natural woodland features in Miller Park as possible. 2. If the hockey rink and parking lot are eliminated from the western part of the park, staff then has a question regarding the location of the access to the park from the west, and location of any parking lots to serve the picnic areas along the west shore of the park. Staff would be recommending an access to a 25-30 car parking lot from the west, as well as eventually extending the southern east/west road to the western border of the park. 3. Staff recommends considering all future skating at Miller Park to be done on the lake surface. The City has experienced little use of the skating on the surface of Round Lake due to the remote location of the warming house. There is a 150' setback for permanent structures surrounding Mitchell Lake shoreline; therefore, staff would recommend consideration of the use of a portable warming house at Miller Park to be located near the protected bay in the southwest portion of the lake. Staff believes this shallow protected bay would provide an ideal location for developing skating on the lake and in close proximity to the shoreline so the rink could receive some lighting and skaters would Review of Preliminary Plans for Miller Park June 30, 1992 Page 2 have direct access to a temporary warming house on shore. Staff would recommend that the hockey rink to serve this quadrant of the community be located at Rice Marsh Lake Neighborhood Park. 4. The roadway through the park comes in close proximity to the baseball field. City staff will be requesting HTPO to evaluate the estimated cost to move that road further to the northwest, which would require some filling in the wetland. There is room on the northwest side of the wetland to mitigate for any loss of wetlands that would be required due to relocating the road. Without this relocation that road will be within reach of many foul balls and, therefore, this is a serious safety concern. 5. The location of the park shelter to accommodate reservation groups will be relocated to the large wooded area on the southeast shore of Mitchell Lake. This will require relocation of the tennis courts to an area north of the eastern most soccer field. Staff are recommending reducing the courts two tennis courts and one basketball court. BL:mdd grade/bob • • • • • • Page 5 July 2, 1992 • Maintaining confidentiality of sensitive information during this process . • Handling any press inquiries into this matter. COMPENSATION We are proposing that our compensation for these acquisition services would be $10,600.00. The payment schedule shall be as follows: $5,800 on or before July 15, 1992 $2,400 on or before August 15, 1992 $2,400 upon closing of the Purchase Agreement(s) All out of pocket expenses for duplicating, faxes, the purchase of any necessary documents (Le. architectural drawings, building code manuals, etc.), long distance telephone, and travel costs will be billed to you at our cost. Any normal project development costs (such as soil tests, engineering or traffic studies, legal fees, city fees, environmental engineers, and additional outside consultant costs) during the Acquisition Phase would be paid directly by the City of Eden Prairie. It should be noted that our total compensation for both the Pre-Acquisition Services ($8,200.00) and Acquisition Services ($10,600.00) represents less than 1 % of the anticipated final acquisition costs (approximately $3,700,000) associated with this project. CANCELLATION The proposed compensation schedule is based on the assumption that continued progress will be made towards a closing of these transactions by September 30, 1992. Should the City determine that it no longer wishes to pursue this analysis or for any reason to continue the services of Sterling Group, this agreement can be canceled and our compensation will be adjusted based upon the percentage of services completed . i~G\D ---------------------------~ ~---- Page 6 July 2, 1992 We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you for your consideration and would be available to start immediately. Sincerely, ·/y,r// ,/~.~Y JJ-------' Kirt Woodhouse President AGREED AND ACCEPTED: City of Eden Prairie By:, ___________________ __ Carl J. Jullie City Manager Executive Vice President Date: _______ _ 14~\ t • • • • • Page 3 July 2, 1992 This strategy will likely require numerous meetings and telephone conversations with the Sellers, their representatives, and the City Manager in order to finalize a transaction. II. Preparation of Purchase Agreements Once we reach agreement on the business points with the EPA Consortium and Mr. Ternan, we will work with the City Attorney to create Purchase Agreements incorporating the above contingencies as well as a contingency for City Council approval on July 7, 1992. It may be necessary to draft a Purchase Agreement for Mr. Ternan ahead of an agreement in order to close our negotiations. With the City Attorney's assistance, we will lead any negotiation of the Purchase Agreements and secure the Seller's signatures. III. Presentation of Purchase Agreements to City Council We will be available on July 7, 1992 to present the executed Purchase Agreements to the City Council for approval. We will be available to provide any background (including our June 15th report) to any Council Members individually or as a group. Additionally, if requested, we will secure 3-6 "letters of interest" from qualified developers interested in this site as additional "comfort" for the Council. IV. Removal of Contingencies/Closing Once City Council approval is obtained, we will coordinate, review, and make a recommendation to the City Manager regarding the soil and environmental tests. Assuming these contingencies are removed, we will remain available to assist the City Attorney in resolving any other outstanding issues prior to closing. ADDmONAL SERVICES In the event the City is successful in the acquisition of these sites we will present another proposal for negotiation of the land purchase(s) for the sites known as Robert Larsen Partners' Parcel and Ms. Tess Burnham's Residence as well as marketing/disposition of the land which is acquired. TIME The period of this agreement, for the Acquisition Services phase shall begin June 16, 1992 and • continue until closing or cancellation of the Purchase Agrccment(s). Page 4 July 2, 1992 AUTHORITY Sterling Group, Inc. shall have the authority to investigate on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie the potential purchase of land sites, but not to commit the City of Eden Prairie to the purchase nor to sign any instruments on their behalf nor to incur any costs for the above other than those described below. NOTIFICATION The City of Eden Prairie agrees to apprise all parties to the proposed transaction of Sterling Group's appointment as the City's representative in these negotiations and refer any further inquiry to Sterling. CONFIDENTIALITY If our work requires us to review information regarding the City that you consider confidential, we will hold that information in strict confidence. You need only identify any such information so we know that you wish it to be kept confidential. Our work product shall be considered the proprietary information of the City of Eden Prairie. Sterling Group will hold this information in strict confidence and shall not disclose it to anyone outside of the City. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RESPONSIBIUTIES The City of Eden Prairie agrees to facilitate these negotiations for the potential purchase of land by: • Providing Sterling with all key documents, drawings, and correspondence in its possession relating to the proposed land parcels. • Delineating the key contact at the City who will have authority over this agreement. • Authorizing the prudent usc of the City Attorney, city staff, and other consultants necessary to quickly and efficiently conduct these negotiations. • • • • • • Sterling Group, Inc. Suite 965 600 South Highway 169 Minneapolis, Minnesota (612) 545-1005 _ 55426 July 2, 1992 Mr. Carl J. Jullie City Manager City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: Fax (612) 545-1510 We appreciate this opportunity to present our proposal for Acquisition Services related to the City's interest in acquiring land in the Flagship/"downtown" area. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Our primary objective is to assist the City of Eden Prairie in their negotiation of a purchase agreement(s) for certain land parcels which will be structured to minimize the City's risk and meet its physical and financial objectives. Specifically these parcels are commonly referred to as the Ternan Parcel (approximately 21.17 acres including the Ternan residence) and the Eden Prairie Associates (EPA) Parcel (approximately 1.79 acres). STERLING GROUP Sterling Group combines a thorough knowledge of the Twin Cities real estate market along with an intimate knowledge of the negotiation, purchase documentation, financing, and due diligence aspects needed to thoroughly analyze and complete a transaction that meets the City's objectives. Page 2 July 2, 1992 SCOPE OF SERVICES -ACQUISITION SERVICES In today's commercial real estate market the acquisition of any property is as much an art as it is a science. Therefore, the manner in which these services are executed is critical to the success of our negotiations. Our services will include the following: I. Implement Acquisition Strategy In our report dated June 15, 1992 we recommended the following acquisition strategy to the City: Purchase both Ternan and EPA Consortium parcels together. We favored this solution since, in our opinion, the development of these sites will set the "tone" and direction for other vacant parcels in the area. The success of this strategy will depend on the execution of the following steps: • Making simultaneous offers to each of Mr. Ternan and the EPA Consortium. • Combined these two sites have approximately 22.96 acres (1,000,029 square feet of land). We recommend an offering price of $3.50 psf ($3,227,578) for the Ternan site and $5.00 psf ($389,320) for the EPA Consortium site. • Each offer should be contingent on the other. • The offers should be presented with a very short time given for acceptance (Le. two weeks). • The offers should be subject to acceptable soil and environmental tests as well as verification of actual site sizes. • If the above is not accepted, the City should discontinue its pursuit of property in this area. • If these negotiations are successful, then the City should pursue an "option" to purchase the "Robert Larsen" parcel for between $115,000 and $145,000 including house removal, foundation removal, and well filling. With this option, the City should negotiate with Ms. Burnham for a similar sale price. If this cannot be accomplished, the City should drop its option and again, let the market act. (The negotiation of the Burnham and Larsen Parcels are not included in this scope of services since we do not know the outcome of our negotiations with Mr. Ternan • • and the EPA Consortium). • • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DATE: July 1, 1992 SUBJECT: TIF Project Schedule/Cash Flow Analysis This memorandum provides background, a project schedule and a cash flow analysis for the proposed Tax Increment Finance (TIP) projects. The attachments generally indicate that 14 of the 17 projects recommended for funding can be constructed using the sequencing schedule as proposed. Council will note that there were 19 projects that came through the hearing process; however, five projects were deleted: 1. West 78th Street from Prairie Center Drive to CSAH 18 ($1,000,000). This project will be part of the frontage road system that would be constructed in conjunction with 1-494 upgrading. The City may have a share in the project cost, but it would be best to incorporate it with the MnDOT work rather than construct it at this time. 2. Water system improvements ($2,600,000). There seemed to be a consensus at the council level that this project should be constructed through user fees and the enterprise fund rather than TIF. 3. First Phase soil correction for Technology Drive realignment. This project had been anticipated as an early funding project using TIF, to be reimbursed by MnDOT at a later date. Due to scheduling and grading issues involving the EBA, MnDOT will be constructing the project with no involvement from the City. 4. Technology Drive from TH 169, west to PrairieCenterDrive (630,000) 5. Valley View Road from Prairie Center Drive, east to Golden Triangle Drive (600,OO~) The results of this analysis are actually better than anticipated. The Finance Department has finished an internal audit of the TIF funding available and has found that there are less outstanding debts against the fund balance than originally anticipated and that since we have not pursued these projects as early as originally expected, additional interest has accumulated. JU t' J _'~ i Mayor and City Councilmembers TIF Project Schedule/Cash Flow Analysis July 1, 1992 Page 2 of 2 A brief explanation of the attachments is as follows: 1. Attachment 1 is a proposed project schedule. This list shows 14 of the 19 projects proposed for funding through the hearing process. City Council will note that the projects have generally been spread throughout a seven-year schedule to accommodate the Land Banking Program as recommended by the Sterling Group. The assumption is that approximately $4,000,000 (or whatever figure is finally determined) would be expended in 1992 to acquire land in the Major Center Area. That land would then be resold in 1995 and the funds reused to make the Urban Design Improvements. This same feature exists for an expenditure in 1993 of $290,000 and assumes a resale of land in 1996. • Additionally, more refined numbers have been generated for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area which indicates a higher need for funding than originally anticipated. The schedule shows expenditures of $900,000 in both 1995 and 1996 and an expenditure of an additional $600,000 in 1997. This schedule seems to better fit the Watershed • District funding schedule as well. The result of the Land Banking and PCRA changes require that Technology Drive ($630,000) and Valley View Road ($600,000) be deleted in order to fund the balance of the projects. 2. Cash Flow Analysis. This sheet shows that at 6 % interest, the spending plan as proposed on the project schedule would leave a positive balance of approximately $112,000. Since these project numbers are based on preliminary estimates, it would be reasonable to '. assume that there is a zero balance at the end of the project. 3. Original Project List as presented at the last public hearing. I will be available to summarize this information at the council meeting on July 7. EAD:ssa • .s:.::: .~ \...; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 • Abbreviated Project Name 1992 Columbine Road 400,000 (PCD to Commonwealth) Signals 145,000 Leona Road 185,000 Singletree Lane P.C.R.A. Urban Design Features/Land Banking 4,000,000 Resale of land TH 212 Columbine Road (Fountain Place to Prairie Center Drive) BRW Projects Street Lighting Misc. Trails 35,000 Medcom Blvd. Wetland Mitigation Park Acquisition (Lake Idlewild) TOTALS 4,765,000 • • July 1, 1992 TIF PROJECT SCHEDULE 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 75,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 70,000 350,000 900,000 900,000 600,000 290,000 1,000,000 600,000 (4,000,000) (290,000) 500,000 520,000 200,000 200,000 245,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 ! 35,000 40,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 200,000 3,495,000 2,045,000 1,665,000 755,000 (4,000,000) (290,000) Income Income GD:tif-schd.prj NEWTIFFL.OW 6% BAL 1/1 EXP 1992 6148290 4765000 1993 3042817 400000 1994 3411166 200000 1995 3309836 3495000 1996 3978577 2045000 1997 2409641 1665000 1998 839270 755000 13325000 O'HEAD REV 200000 1586000 150000 726000 100000 50000 4000000 290000 500000 6602000 l 1 . , .~. -' i • INT INC BAL 12/31 273527 3042817 192349 3411166 198670 3309836 213740 3978577 • 186065 2409641 94628 839270 27706 111976 1186686 111976 • • • • J. Columbin!l....R!lJul cltlen.lon from Prairie Centcr Drive to Common Wealth Drive ($4(lO,(XXl) (RlW cln.lnar required hy April I, 1992) 2. ~ ($800,000) a. Intenection of Prairie Center Drive and Franlo Road h. Intersection of Columbine Road and Prairie Center Drive c. IntcrRectlon of SlnlZletreo Lane and Prairie Center Drive <l. IntcrRection of TechnololZY DrIve and Prairie Center Drive e. Intersection of Plaza Drive and PraIrie Center Drive f. Intersection of Plaza Drive and Valley View Road g. Intersection of Technology Drive and Mitchell Road h. Intersection of Fountain Place and T.H. 169 i. Ramp terminals at 1-494 and Valley View Road j. Ramp terminals at 1-494 and Prairie Center Drive k. Intersection ofT.H. 169 and Leona Road 3. Leona Road reconstruction to provide new intersection with West 7Sth Street ($200,000) 4. Singletree Lane widening and addition of tum lanes between Eden Road and T.H. 169 ($350,000) 5. City share of cost to create Purgatory Recreation Area Park improvements west of Prairie Center Drivc ($1,800,000) 6. Urban design features in Major Center Arealgreenway connections ($1,600,000) a. Street lighting enhancement b. Decorate pedestrian lighting c. Sidewalks d. Landscaping e. Street furniture f. Pedestrian overpass g. Land bank for economic development (up to $1 million) 7. City cost attributable to the MnDOT project to construct T.H. 212 between 1-494 and Mitchell Road ($500,000) S. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Columbine Road Extension to Prairie Center Drive ($520,000) Projects identified in the 1985 BRW Traffic Study ($645,000) a. Additional tum lanes on Bryant Lake Drive at Valley View Road b. Intersection improvements at Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road c. Through lane and intersection improvements on Prairie Center Drive between Viking Drive and West 78th Street d. Additional through lane in each direction on T.H. 169 at Prairie Center Drive and extension of tum lane between T.H. 169 and Joiner Way on Prairie Center Drive e. Intersection improvements at Washington Avenue and Valley View Road Permanent street lighting improvements in Major Center Area ($800,000) a. Prairie Center Drive f. b. Technology Drive g. c. Eden Road h. e. Valley View Road i. Miscellaneous pedestrian trails/sidewalks ($110,000) West 78th Street Columbine Road Plaza Drive Singletree Lane a. Trails and sidewalks along each side of Prairie Center Drive east of T.H. 169 to West 7Sth Street b. Trail around Lake Idlewild c. Sidewalk along east side of Top View Drive between Roberts Drive and Valley View Road Medcom Boulevard Extension from Joiner Way to Franlo Road ($221,000) Vallev View Road improved to urban section and construct permanent creek crossing, northeast of Flying Cloud Drive ($600,000) Wetland mitigation sites ($200,000) Park aCQuisition on Lake Idlewild (1-2 acres) ($200,000) West 78th Street, widened to four lanes from Prairie Center Drive to CSAH IS ($1,000,000) Technology Drive, widened to four lanes from Prairie Center Drive to CSAH 169 ($630,000) Water system improvements ($2,600,000) a. New 2,000,000 gallon elevated water storage b. 20" diameter trunk watermain extension between water plant and Prairie Center Drive first Phase soil correction (surcharging) of realigned Technology Drive west of Prairie Center Drive in conjunction with T.H. 212 improvements (Delete -to be done by MnDOT)