Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/07/1992• • • TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1992 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 8:00·PM, CITY HALL COUNcn.CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive - COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, lean Harris, H. Martin lessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl· I. Iullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney R~er Pauly, Finance Director Iohn D. Frane, DireCtor of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director· of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Council Recorder Kate Garwood· PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUS~S II. MINUTES A. Joint City CouncillFlyine Cloud Airport Advisory Commission meetine held Tuesday. March 10. 1m B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday. March 10. 1992 m. CONSENT CALENDAR A.Clerk's License List B. Resolution Prohibiting Parkin, on Rowland Road -MS. 181~ 118-01. I.C. 52-061 (Resolution No. 92-53) . C. Resolution Prohibitin, Parkin, on Dell (south) -MSA 181-113- jll (Resolution No. 92-70) D. Resolution Probibitbi, Parking on Dell Road (Porth) '" MSA 181:108-03 (Resolution No. 92-71) E. A ward Contract -Street Sweeping. I.C. 52-250 (Resolution No. 92-54) F. A ward Contract for Four-Wheel Drive Mid-Size Tractor Page 577 Page 583 Page 599 Page 600 Page 601 Page 602 Page 603 Page 605 City Council Agenda April 7, 1992 Page Two G. NORMARK CORPORATE BEADOUARTEBS by Normark Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No~ 4-92, Zoning District Change from Office to 1-2 on 3.77 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Normark Corporate Headquarters; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-62 Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No.4- 92, and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No~ 92-65, Site Plan Review. 3.n acres for construction of a 48,000 square foot office/warehouse building. Location: East of Golden Triangle Drive,. north of !fme Mile Creek. (Ordinance No. 4-92.. Zonin&-District Change; Resolution No. 92-62 .. Authorizing Summary and Publication; and Resolution No. 92-65 .. Site Plan Review) H. Resolution No. 92-51. Fstablishin& Precinct Boundaries I. Participation in 1992193 Minnesota Cities Participation J. Pro&ram lMCPPl (Resolution No. 92-(1) . Approve Plans and Specifications for Dell Road lmproyemeDts between Cascade Drive and West 82nd Street. I.C. 52-160 (ReSolution No. 92-59) K. Approve Plans and Specificatiom for Dell Road Improvements between m 5 and twilieht Drive. I.C. 5k156 (Resolution No. '92-60 & Resolution No. 92-72) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS[MEETINGS· A. Amendments for Tax Increment Financin& .. 1992 Amendment of Development Program for Development District No.1 and 1992 Amendment of Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Districts Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (Resolution No. 92-46) Continued from March 17, 1m B. Herita&e Road Closure (Continued Crom February 4, 1m) C. Order Impruements· and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Cmk Knolls. I.C. 52-194 (Resolution No •. 92-SS) D. Order Improyements and Preparation of Plans and· Specifications for Braxton Drive. I.C.52-189 (Resolution No. 92-56) Page \607 . Page 614 Page '618 Page 621 e· Page 624 Page 641 Page 642 Page 643 e • • • City Council Agenda April 7, 1992 Page Three E. F. FAIRFIELD 1992 AMENDMENT by Centex Real Estate. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 148.2 acres to the overall Fairfield PUD; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers and ZQning District Amendment within the RI-9.5 District on 21.8 acres; Preliminary Plat of 21.8 acres into 71 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: North of Candlewood Parkway, west of Braxton Drive. (Resolution No. 92-13 -PUD Concept Amendment; Ordinance No. 5-92-PVD-2- 92 -PUD District and Amendment within the Rl-9~S District; and Resolution No. 92-27 -Preliminary Plat) VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH by Victory Lutheran Church. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Public, and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres; Zoning District Amendment within 'the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres, Preliminary Plat of 10 acres into 5 lots. for construction of a 7,600 square foot church and 4 new single family lots. Location: East of Eden Prairie Road, west of Red Oak: Drive and north of Bergen Drive. (Resolution No. 92-63 -Guide Plan Amendment; Ordinance No. 9-92 -Zoning District Change; and Resolution No. 92-64 -Preliminary Plat) G. CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL by Independent School District 272. Request for Site Plan Review within the Public, 1-2 and Rl- 22 Zoning Districts on 60 acres fQr construction of a .approximately 60,000 square foot addition and parking circulation improvements to the Central Middle School. Location: 8025 School Road. (Resolution No. 92-66 -Site Plan Review) H. PRAIRIE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL by Independent School District 272. Request for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 9.9 acres for construction of a 15,800 square foot addition to the Prairie View Elementary Schoo1. Location: 17255 Peterborg Road (Resolution No. 92-67 -Site Plan Review) I. FORFST HILlS ELEMENTARY by Independent School District 272. Request for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on approximately 58 acres for construction of an 18,350 square foot addition with parking and circulation improvements to the Forest Hills Elementary School. Location: 13708 Holly Road. (Resolution No. 92-68 -Site Plan Review) Page 644 Page 654 Page 688 Page 699 Page 706 City Council Agenda April 7, 1992 Page Four J. CDBG YEAR xym PROGRAM f.UNDlNG (Resolution No. 92-(9) K.· AMENDMENT ,TO. YEAR xvn g>BG PROGRAM (Resolution No. 92-49) L. VACATION 92-01 -Vacation of Drainage and Utility Basements , on Part of Outlot A. Menard Addition (Resolution No. ~27) M. YACATION 92-02 -Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements on Lots 1 & 2. Block 1. Wyndham Knoll (Resolution No. 92-29) V~ PAYMENT OF CLAIMS, VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. ·FAIRFIELD 1992 AMENDMENT by Centex Real Estate. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 5.-92-PUD-2-92, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers, and Zoning District Amendment within the R1~9.5 District on 21.8 acres;' Approval of Developer's Agreement for Fairfield 1992 Amendment; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-29, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance No. 5-92-PUD-2- 92 and Orde$g Publication of Said Summary, Resolution No. 92- 57, Final Plat Approval for Fairfield 9th Addition; and Resolution No. 92-58, Approving Final Plat for Fairfield 10th Addition. 21.8 acres into 71 single family lots and road right-of-way. Location: North of Candlewood Parkway, west of Braxton Drive. (Ordinance No. S-92-PUD-2-92 -PUD District and Amendment within the Rl-9.! District; Resolution No. 92-29, Authorizing Summary and Publication, Resolution No. 92-!7-Final Plat for Fairfield 9th Addition; and Resolution No. 92-!8 -FinaJ. Plat for Fairfield 10th Addition) vu. PEJ'rnONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS vm. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMIlTEES IX. ,APPOINTMENTS A. Human Riehls & Services Commission -Appointment of ,I member to fill an unexpired term through February 28, 1994 Page .724 •• Page 728 'Page 730 Page 734 Page 738 Page 750 .' '\ • • • City Council Agenda April 7, 1992 Page Five B . Parks. Recreation & Natural· Resources Commigton Appointment of 1 member to fill an unexpired term through February 28, 1993 X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Manam 1. Goals & Objectives 2. Guidelines for Appointin& Board/Commission members C. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource 1 .. Consideration for Construction of Second Ice Rink D. Report of Director of Plannin& E. A.. Summary of Transportation Demand Mana&ement Stn-tea plan 1-494 Corridor Commission Report of Director of Public Works F. Report of City Attorney XI. ·OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT Page 761 Page ·770 Page 784 Page 801 • UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION TUESDAY, March 10, 1992 COUNCILMEMBERS: FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS: COUNCIL AND COMMISSION STAFF: ROLL CALL 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock Tim Ashenfelter, Kent Barker, Andrew Detroi, John P. DOw, Jay Olson, Gary Schmidt, and William Turkula City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Scott Kipp (Staff Liaison), and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson All members were present. Mayor Tenpas arrived late. • I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER • Councilmember Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:15 P.M. I I. MAC UPDATE A. Runway Wajyer Request of the FAA Schmidt said the request for a 1600-foot extension created controversy so the request was cut back to 1100 feet. He said the real issue now is the separation required between the runway and the highway. He said we need a waiver for modification of the design standards in order to cut back from 1600 to 1100 feet. Barker said he was unaware that an extension request had been made and that he would like to see a copy of what was submitted. Schmidt said the letter and package went out just yesterday, and that he would bring a copy to the next Commission meeting. Barker asked what the type of aircraft changes are that require a 20% increase in the size of the airport. Schmidt said that there will be some turbine operation. Mayor Tenpas arrived at 6:20 PM . City Council Meeting 2 March 10, 1992 Pidcock said she didn't understand why the manufacturers • were asked for their input. Schmidt replied that they were asked about specific for their aircraft, not for their recommendations on developing the airport. Pidcock asked why the Council didn't see this before it was submitted. Schmidt said it will come back to the Council with the response from the FAA, and there will probably be another Public Hearing. Anderson asked if it was not true that the request for the runway extension was brought by those who sell and maintain aircraft at Flying Cloud and who want to sell larger aircraft. Schmidt said those individuals had input, but the main issues were the overflow from the International Airport and the demand in the southwest suburbs for improved airport facilities. Barker asked what kinds of aircraft were included in the request and in the inquiry to the manufacturers. Schmidt replied that they had talked to Cessna, Beech and others. A discussion followed regarding the difference in landing space requirements for the various aircraft, the size of the aircraft involved, and the relative levels of noise created by those aircraft. • Harris asked Schmidt to review the specifics of the request. Schmidt responded that the south parallel runway will be extended 1100 feet to the west. He said it will probably take two to three months for FAA review. Barker asked if the Met Council is involved in this in any way. Schmidt said the Met Council did a study two years ago of the reliever airport system in the metro area. He said they recommended that the reliever airports in the system be better utilized and that the runway at Flying Cloud be extended 500 feet. He said the Met Council has not formally given approval for the planned extension but we need the FAA waiver first before submitting it to the Met Council. Jessen asked when that would happen. Schmidt said they may have submitted the same plan to the Met Council at the same time it was submitted to the FAA. Barker said he understood that the Met Council had asked very specific and hard questions and that MAC has never responded to those questions. B. Nojse Abatement plan Schmidt said that part of the promise to the Council and th H • City would be the development of a noise abatement plan. said they are working through the Council and the • • • City Council Meeting 3 March 10,1992 Commission, with the assistance of the Tower Manager at the airport. He said they have developed a plan that was endorsed by the Council and adopted by MAC. He said the Tower Manager has submitted the plan to the region for their approval and their legal counsel recommended that a Part 150 study be done. He said they have appealed that because they didn't feel that Flying Cloud airport fell under the scope of operations of a Part 150 study. He said their appeal is being reviewed. He added that they have indicated that they will not approve such items as night-time restrictions. Barker asked if it would be appropriate for the Commission to see all the communications and to take part in the negotiations. schmidt said this had happened just last week between meetings of the Commission . .. Jessen noted that Schmidt and several others from MAC met last week with some of the City Staff, Councilmember Anderson and himself to bring us up to date on some of the items. Tenpas asked if they are trying to come into the airport over the river. Schmidt said they had found that they are not using the south parallel approach as much as they could. He said it has to do with a switch in communications between the approach controllers. Pidcock asked if we could negotiate having certain hours of regular operation with emergency landings only during the nighttime or if restrictions could be placed on noise levels during nighttime operations. Schmidt said this gets into an issue of interstate commerce regulation. Ashenfelter said the Flying cloud Business Association members would probably operate based on the nighttime restrictions on a voluntary basis, and that would get 99% of the traffic that might concern residents. Jessen asked to what extent the curfew hour is being enforced. Ashenfelter said there are some flights in the middle of the night but they aren't flight training operations. He said they cannot regulate the private owners' operations. Jessen noted that there seem to be a handful of people causing a vast majority of the nighttime traffic problems. Anderson said local and state governments can restrict noise on the highways during certain hours and that is interstate commerce also. Schmidt said that you can set noise levels but you cannot restrict certain uses of the highway. He said the airport does meet the state noise level restrictions. City Council Meeting 4 March 10, 1992 Turkula said it seems that there is information available • but there doesn't seem to be a formal process for MAC to get the information to the Commission. Tenpas directed Jullie to work with Kipp so that the material is consistently disseminated. Barker said that he has not received a response to his complaints to the listed noise number for MAC and asked if it is a practice for them to respond to such complaints. Pidcock said she thought a policy should be instituted whereby every complaint is logged with copies of every complaint and the response to it going to the Commission. Kipp said they receive the complaints on a monthly basis, but they do not receive a log of the responses . . Tenpas said he would suggest assigning the issue of complaint handling to the Commission and then return to the Council with what they would recommend be adopted as policy. C. utiljty Extensjon Allen Gray said both MAC and BFI have a need to consider both sewer and water service. He said MAC has a consulting engineering firm that has worked with the City on extending a watermain along Hwy.1 and another out Hwy. 169. He said BFI has hired a consultant to look at providing sanitary • sewer service to their location. He said both studies will probably have to be merged and put into a City-prepared Feasibility Report. He noted that there probably would have be some easements required. Barker asked if they are also discussing storm sewers. said we're not involved in storm sewer improvements. said the master plan for the new airport layout has addressed that to some extent. Gray He Jessen said that they did spend some time on that at the meeting last week and that he and Anderson reiterated their concern about storm water runoff. I I I. ADVISORY COMMISSION DIRECTION Jullie said the Commission would like some discussion and input about the on-going role of the Commission. Dow said he thinks there is a problem of communication between the Commission, the Council and MAC. He said he thought our representative to MAC should be put in the pipeline with the Commission so that the representative can truly represent Eden Prairie at the MAC meeting. He said he thought the MAC representative should attend the Commission meetings when they • are covering items of interest to both the City and MAC. 5~() • • • City Council Meeting 5 March 10, 1992 The consensus was to have Staff draft a letter from the Mayor to the MAC representative requesting that he attend a Commission meeting in order to meet the Commission members. Tenpas said that during the past two appointment processes the Council has tried to create some diversity on the Commission. He said he thought we now have a good balance on the Commission and that he feels good about the information and recommendations that the Council is now receiving from the Commission. He said he thought the Commission is going in the right direction and that the major issue seems to be one of communication. Jessen said he thought the goal of the Commission is to balance the interests of having a viable and good operation at Flying Cloud with the noise and other adverse aspects it brings to the community. He said anything the Commission can do to help the nearby res i dents rea 1 i ze the -importance of the airport wi 11 be greatly appreciated. Harris said she believes the importance of the Commission to the Council is to receive, evaluate and examine issues and concerns that affect the community. She said the Council does listen when the Commission brings concerns or recommendations. Anderson said he values the Commission's work on the everyday details that the Council doesn't have time to look at. He said it is very important that the Commission give their advice to the Counci 1. Pidcock said she wanted to thank all the Commission members for their work and to let them know that the Council is open to their suggestions. Barker said MAC has done a good job with such things as the landscaping; however he will continue to have deep concerns about the operation of the airport. He said he thought it was important that the Commission be aware of meetings between Council members and MAC. Dow said he had suggested several times that one of the Commission members attend MAC meetings to be recognized as a member of the Commission. Tenpas suggested that the Commission members might want to rotate attendance at the MAC meetings. Anderson said he thought it would be proper to have a Commission member attend meetings of the Council and MAC. Tenpas asked Staff to be sure notify the Commission of such meetings. Ashenfelter said he was concerned that there is a lack of direction as to what the Council wants from the Commission. He said it doesn't seem like any of the data they prepare is ever published in the local newspapers . 5Z1 -----------------------~------------------------------------------ City Council Meeting 6 March 10, 1992 Tenpas said the Council realizes the economic viability of the • . airport but we must try to balance that with the issue of whether a bigger airport has value to the community at large. He said that, while the Council has been informally against the expansion of the airport, it is still important to maintain a good relationship with the businesses there and to receive information on safety and other issues at the airport. Harris said the Council is concerned that the airport remain a safe facility and will look at what is required to assure the continued safe operation. Detroi said he thought someone from the Commission should have been present at the public meetings that were held. Anderson said he would encourage the Commissioners to call him or the other Council members if they have concerns about airport matters. Olson said he had not seen anything that showed the Council to be opposed to the airport expansion. Tenpas said the Council is awaiting further information from MAC before taking a formal position. Jessen said he thought this Commission is unlike other commissions in that they do not advise the Council on actions that need to be taken because the Council has no control over the. airport. He said it would be important for the Commission to advise the Council on the real ramifications of the proposed airport expansion. He said he would like to get a report on that from the Commission at an early meeting. Tenpas said he thought it was important to schedule another meeting with the Commission in the next eight weeks to continue this discussion. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 PM to begin the regular Council meeting. • • • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Jan Nelson Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM. All members were present. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION FOR GIRL SCOUT WEEK, MARCH 8-14 1992 The Mayor proclaimed the week of March 8-14 1992 to be Girl Scout Week in Eden Prairie. Several Girl Scouts were present to receive the proclamation. ACKNOWLEDGE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT WINNING 1992 PARTNERSHIP MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE PUBLIC SERVICE AWARD City Manager Jullie said the City has been presented with a plaque as a winner of the 1992 Partnership Minnesota Award for cooperative efforts in prairie restoration in Eden Prairie. Tenpas congratulated the Staff for their efforts on this project. Anderson noted that this award came about because of a coope,'ative effort between the school system and the City that began two years ago on Earth Day. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added Item X.A,l. Reassessment of Parcels; ~ X.A.2. Guidelines for Appointments to Commissions; ~ City Council Meeting 2 March 10, 1992 X.A.3. Ethics. Jessen added Item X.A.4. Report on the • League of Cities Convention. Anderson added Item X.A.5. Metropolitan Environmental Quality Organization Ad Hoc Group. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously_ II. MINUTES A. Joint City Council/parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Meeting Held Tuesday. January 14, ~ MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the Joint City Council/Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission Meeting held Tuesday, January 14, 1992, as published. Motion carried unanimously_ B. City Council/park Bond Referendum Committee Discussion Meeting Held Tuesday, January 28, 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the City Council/Park Bond • Referendum Committee Discussion Meeting held Tuesday, January 28, 1992, as published. Motion carried unanimously. C. City Council Meeting Held Tuesday, February 4, 1992 MOTION: pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 4, 1992, as published. Motion carried unanimously. D. Special City Council Meeting Held Tuesday, February 11. ~ MOTION: pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, February 11, 1992, as published. Motion carried unanimously. E. Soecial City Council Meeting Held Thursday, Februar v 20, 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Thursday, February 20, 1992, as published. Motion carried with Tenpas and Jessen abstaining. III. CONSENT CALENDAR • • • • City Council Meeting 3 March 10, 1992 A. Clerk's License List B. Accept Donation of Bermel property and Approve payment of Taxes, on the condition that the property is determined to have a clear title, C. Receive Feasibility Report for Braxton Drive street and Utility Improyements, I.C. 52-189, and set public Hearing Date for March 10, 1992 (Resolution No. 92-32) D. Receive Feasibility Report for Creek Knoll Improvements, I.C. 52-194 and set public Hearing pate for March 10, 1992 (Resolution No. 92-21) E. Release of Special Assessment Agreement -Alfred E. pavelka F. Final plat Approval of Country Glen 2nd Addition (located east of puck Lake Road and south of W. 62nd Street) (Resolution No. 92-23) G. TACO BELL by Taco Bell Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 7-92, Zoning District Amendment within the C- Reg-Ser Zoning District on 0.56 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Approval of Developer' Agreement for Taco Bell; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-44, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 7-92, and Ordering Publication of said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-43, Site Plan Review. Location: Joiner Way, south of Goodyear Tire. (Ordinance No. 7-92, Zoning District Amendment, Resolution No. 92-43, Site Plan approval, Resolution No. 92-44, Authorizing Summary and Publication) H. Final plat Approval of YES Addition (Taco Bell Site) located south of Prairie Center Drive (Resolution No. 92-37 ) I. Final plat Approval of Fairfield of Eden prairie 8th Addition. located east of Braxton Drive and north of Candlewood parkway (Resolution No. 92-38) J. Approve Change Order No.2 for Cedar Ridge Estates 2nd, I.C. 52-225 K. Approve Change Order No.3 for Bluffs West 9th Addition, Bluffs East 8th Addition, Bluestem Ridge and Hawk High Ridge. I,C. 52-224, 52-223. 52-199 L. M. MWCC permit Application for Windfield Addition (Resolution No. 92-42) Appointment of Election Judges for April 7. 1992 Presidential primary (Resolution No. 92-10) City Council Meeting 5 t-1arch 10, 1992 B . There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 2-92 for Zoning District Change. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to adopt Resolution No. 92-19 approving the Preliminary Plat and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and incorporating an Assessment Agreement in line with the findings of the Feasibility Study completed for the property. Motion carried unanimously. PRAIRIE GREEN OUTDOOR STORAGE by Birchwood Labs. Request of Birchwood Labs for Zoning District Amendment within the I-2 District on 3 acres, with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals and Site plan Review on 3 acres for construction of an outdoor storage facility to be known as Prairie Green Outdoor Storage. Loaction: Southwest of Fuller Road, south of Birchwood Labs, east of Lincoln Drive. (Ordinance No. 6-92 -Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 District) Continued from February 4. 1992 Jullie noted that this was also a continued hearing, and noted that proponent has asked that their request be withdrawn. MOTION: pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to close the Public Hearing and to acknowledge withdrawal of the Prairie Green Outdoor Storage proposal. Motion carried unanimously. C. NORMARK CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS by Normark Corporation - c/o Hoyt Properties. Request for Zoning District Change from Office to 1-2 on 3.77 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, site Plan Review on 3.77 acres for construction of a 48,000 square-foot office/warehouse building to be known as Normark Corporation (Ordinance No. 4-92 - Zoning District Change) Jullie stated notice of this Public Hearing was published in the Eden Prairie News and individual notices were sent to owners of surrounding properties. Steve Hoyt, representing proponent, addressed the proposal. Enger said the Planning Commission considered this proposal at their January 27th meeting and approved it on a 3-2 vote, subject to the recommendations contained • • • • • • City Council Meeting 6 Ma,ch 10, 1992 in the Staff Repo,t of Janua,y 24th. He said that app,ovals have been ,eceived f,om the DNR and the A,my Co,ps of Enginee,s. He said they have ,ecommended that alte,native construction methods for sewe, and wate, connections be looked at to save additional trees on the p,ope,ty. He said they have also recommended that the,e be a gua,antee of construction of the proof of pa,king on the site. He said they need to ,eview alternatives to the 16-foot retaining wall on the east p,ope,ty line with the adjacent p,ope,ty owne,. Di,ecto, of Pa,ks, Rec,eation & Natu,al Resou,ces Lambe,t said the Pa,ks Commission reviewed this proposal at their February 3rd meeting and again at a special on-site meeting on Feb,uary 8th. He said the app,oval was ,ecommehded on a 3-2 vote, subject to the ,ecommendations of the Staff repo,t. He said that the Commission's main conce,ns were the extent of g,ading into the hill and the land use. Jessen asked about the alternative t,ail plan. Lambert said the,e seem to be two feasible alte,natives--the one proposed by proponents and anothe, that would continue the t,ail on the south side of the c,eek. Jessen asked if that would be a City p,oject. Lambs,t said it would be and the,e a,e a lot of t,ails with a highe, p,io,ity in the City than this one. Ande,son said he had visited the site and walked the prope,ty lines to see if the,e were othe, options for the trail. He said he is conce,ned that we don't give up on putting a t,ail in that a,ea. Jessen asked if the sto,m wate, management is adequate because the prope,ty is right on the c,eek. Enger said it is intercepted in a pond and will meet the standards afte, construction; however, they will have to be careful during const,uction to keep all the soil on the site. Pidcock asked what was meant by the refe,ence in the the Planning Commission minutes to a letter f,om the DNR stating that the p,oject would not be compatible with cu"ent state sho,eline management guidelines and U'ram's ,eply that Eden Prairie had neve, met the State Sho,eline O,dinances. Enge, said the o,iginal State Shoreland ,egulations were put out in 1975 in a model ordinance, and Eden Prairie put togethe, a customized o,dinance in response to it. He said we came into a lot of conf 1 ict wit h some of t~he sta nda,ds set fo, t hill the State guidelines. He said we have been wo)"king with the DNR eve, since to ,esolve some of the issues. City Council Meeting 7 March 10, 1992 Pidcock asked what the differences are between the new • State regulations and our ordinance. Enger said the new State regulations are similar to the old ones; consequently, there are several areas of difference with our ordinance. A discussion followed regarding new Federal wetland regulations and State Shoreland regulations. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing, to approve 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 4-92 for a Zoning District Amendment from Office to 1-2 on 3.77 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Boa'rd of Adjustments'and Appeals and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried 4-1 with Anderson opposed. Anderson said he voted against the motion because he is concerned about the land use changes. He said there was an agreement made with the City that this area would be an office area. He said he is concerned about the number of variances that the City gives up, about the way the city property is being given away, and • about the tree loss. He said the Nine-Mile Creek area does not have a plan such as the one developed for Purgatory Creek so we have no long-range plan to refer to for development of this area. Tenpas said that he appreciated what the developer did and that he wanted to welcome Normark to the community. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve payment of claims. Motion carried with Anderson. Harris. Jessen. Pidcock and Tenpas voting "Aye." VI. ORPINANCES ANP RESOI UTIONS A. Approve plans and Specifications for Rowland Road Improyements. I.C. 52-067 (Resolution No. 92-40) Jullie said Staff has been working on the plJns and specifications for the improvements to Rowland Road; however, the project has been delayed because of neighborhood concerns with the location of the entrance to Bryant Lake Regional Park. He said an informational meeting was held on March 4th with the residents and Hennepin Parks representatives. He said that meeting resulted in two additional alternatives and that residents presented a petition that stated their :3trong preference that the main entrance be relocated. • • • • City Council Meeting 8 March 10, 1992 Gray reviewed the site map for the project and explained the proposed alternative plan for placement of the park entrance. He said staff will bring back a separate planting plan can be better developed after the grading is completed and residents have been consulted for their input. Pidcock asked if most of the traffic comes in from Shady Oak Road. Gray said about 80% of the traffic comes from that direction. Anderson asked if they planned to drop the road at the entrance to the park. Gray said it will be dropped about 1 to 1-1/2 feet. Anderson asked how big a berm can be put up. Gray said they could get a 4-5 foot berm in the buffer area and that with tree plantings there could be a lO-foot berm in a short time. Tenpas asked if it would be possible to put some kind of fencing or sound barrier between existing pine trees. Gray said that could be considered, and that Staff will be working with the residents along here on the landscaping plans . Anderson asked what will be done about pal"king and speed limits along Rowland Road. Gray said Rowland Road will be signed for no parking and for 30 MPH speeds. Karen Kleinman, 11575 Raspberry Hill Road, said the entrance is directly across from her back yard, and she will get headlights in her back yard at night. She said she is also concerned about park users parking in the nearby residential streets and walking into the park. She said their petition proposes that the entrance be moved down to the curve in the road. Jessen asked where the entrance was planned to be five years ago when the Council approved the plan. Doug Bryant, representing Hennepin Parks, reviewed the original entrance location, and said that this proposal is very consistent with the plan presented to the Council in 1986. Karen Smisak, 6661 Cherokee Trail, said she is opposed to the alternative plan put forth by the other residents because the entrance would then L,e directly in back of her property. She said she also has concerns about extra traffic and parking on the street. Jessen asked how many boat parking spaces there will in the park. Bryant said there will be 20 spaces. I oe City Council Meeting 9 March 10, 1992 Jessen asked how many could stack at the entrance. • Gray said there will be about 200 feet of space at the entrance. Anderson noted that there is a restriction on boats on the lake on Sunday, and he thought that would cut down on the number of boats using the lake. Ron Suchodolski, 11599 Raspberry Hill Road, said he has concerns about the children crossing the road to set the bus. Gray said they haven't reviewed the plans with the School District; however, there is no good place for the buses to turn around. Suchodolski said he is also concerned about the added traffic. Tenpas said this should not be that much of an issue since there is no school dUring the summer when the park is being most heavily used. Tenpas directed Staff to write a letter to the Hopkins School Board regarding the issue of bus turnaround. Joe Lee, 11551 Raspberry Hill Road, and Richard LGe, 11539 Raspberry Hill Road, said they object to the entrance location and they have a petition with 130 residents' signatures to relocate the entrance to the east of their neighborhood. He said this Hould move • the entrance away from the main residential area. Richard Lee asked if there was a restriction on the number of boats allowed on the lake at one time. Lambert said the City of Eden Prairie does not control that access. He said the number of parking spaces is limited and the motor size limitation is in effect on Sunday and holidays. Judith Anderson, representing Hennepin Parks, said that the park hours are sunrise to sunset so cars will not go into the park during the night. She said they have had no reports of violence in the park. Maureen Henderson, 11769 Thornhill Road, said she would like to see as little encroachment on the park land as possible. She said she thought there would be more problems with safety if the entrance were moved to the area of the curve in the road. Dave Bell, 11841 Dunhill Road, said he thought the revised plan looks like a nice accommodati,)n, although it looks more expensive. He said he would not like to see the entrance located on the curve. Jo Badolato, 6637 Cherokee Trail, said she didn't want the entrance in her backyard either, and all the property owners on Cherokee Trail were promi3ed that the entrance would be at the original location. • • • • City council Meeting 10 March 10, 1992 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 92-40 to approve the plans and specifications and order the advertisement for bids for I.C. 52-067, Rowland Road Improvements. Anderson said he thought the plans shown tonight are the best ever presented and that it is the best possible option for the entrance. Jessen said he would support the motion and would commend the Park District for their offer to relocate the road. He said he thought that an attractive buffer zone could be created if the City works with the neighborhood. He said this also gives us the opportunity to build-a safe bike trail on the north side of the road with a safe entrance into the park. He said we have pressed the Park District for the development of the park and they have responded. Harris said she also thought this was the most attractive alternative we have seen. She said the additional land and screening make a very attractive entrance and enhancement to Rowland Road. Pidcock said she went to look at the property and observed the potential safety problem for childl"en riding school buses. She said she thought moving the road past the Raspberry Hill Road intersection was a better alternative. Tenpas said he has a problem with the proximity of the entrance to the two houses. He said he didn't think there would be that much difference in cost to move the entrance further to the south. Tenpas called the question. Vote on the Motion: Motion failed with Tenpas and pidcock opposed. Gray said that the project will now have to be put on hold until we can find out whether it is permissible to encroach on the wetlands. Pidcock asked if the entrance could be moved to tIle west. Gray said it was moved from that location at the last hearing. Anderson noted that there will be less traffic going into this park then into an elementary school. He said he questioned the use of taxpayers' Gloney to run a parallel road in the park if the entrance is moved to the east. City Council Meeting 11 t1arch 10, 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to reconsider the motion. Motion carried unanimously_ Vote on the Reconsidered Motion: Motion carried with Tenpas opposed_ The Council then considered Agenda Item IX.A. out of sequence. IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointments to the Bluff Committee The consensus of the Council was that two Councilmembers should serve on the committee. Jessen and Anderson agreed to serve. Lambert said the Parks Commission recommended that a representative of the U.S_ Fish & Wildlife serve as an ex officio member and that two members of the Parks Commission also serve on the committee. A discussion followed regarding the composition of the committee and how it should operate. • MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to • constitute a committee of 10 voting members and one non-voting, ex officio member from the u.S. Fish & VII. Wildlife Service to serve as a Bluff Study Committee. This resolution shall supersede any previously adopted resolutions pertaining to the composition of this committee. Motion carried unanimously_ The following citizens were then appointed to serve on the Bluff Committee: Wallace Hustad; Kate Laseski; Glenn A. Olson; Darril Peterson; Edward A. Schlampp; Scott Wallace; Loren Wuttke; Dean Edstrom; Tom Larson, ex officio; and Councilmembers Jessen and Anderson. PETITIONS. REQUESTS ANn COMMUNICATIONS A. Request of Weston Bay Neighborhood to Revise Millpr park plan Lambert outlined some amendments to the Development Plan fo)-Miller Park. He saie.:! some of the residents in the Weston Bay neighborhood have requested revision to plans for the park drea adjacent to theil-neiohborhood. He said their major concern was the large lighted parking lot near their neighbodiood. He said they have agreed to the alternative plan developed by Staff. Jessen asked if we end up wi th the same numbe)-of • parking spaces. Lambert said we will lose two spaces under the revised plans. • • • City Council Meeting 12 March 10, 1992 Lambert said the neighborhood wanted to eliminate the right-of-way out to County Road 4, to provide as high berms as possible, and to provide lighting that will be directed onto the playing surfaces and not onto the neighboring residences. Anderson said he would encourage retaining pedestrian access to the park from the residential neighborhood. A discussion followed regarding pedestrian access to the park from two separate points in the neighborhood. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Tenpas, to approve the revisions to the plan for Miller Park as recommended by the P~rks Commission and revised by Staff. Anderson said we plan the neighborhoods to provide easy entrance into our parks. He said the developer made a deal with the City to allow access to the lake off the long cul-de-sac, and he thought that access was very important. Lambert said he thought that access was for the people in the cul-de-sac, and the access for others would be through the other entrance. Vote on the Motion: Motion carried with Anderson and Pidcock opposed. pidcock said she had spoken with residents at the Edendale Senior Center who asked for a variety of things, including trails and benches that they could use while walking. She said she thought we are cuttino off access for the rest of the community by not allowing access off the cul-de-sac. Jessen said he thought wea are preserving the easiest way into the park, and that a gate could be put in the fence to allow access from the cul-de-sac at a later date. Anderson said he was concerned that we look at the big picture when we consider items such as this and make decisions based on what 1S best for the entire City. Several residents asked to address the proposal as some of the items they requested had not been addressed. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to contin~e the discussion to the next City Council meeting in order to allow the residents to provide input. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Meeting 13 r1arch MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to continue the • meeting to 11:30 PM. Motion carried unanimously. B. Subdivision of the N i/? of Lot 4, Block 2, Fden Heights (Resolution No. 92-41) C. Subdivision of Lot 9. Block 1, Eden Heights (Resolution No, 92-39) Jullie said these items may have some implications in regard to our special assessment policy. Gray reviewed the requests to subdivide the two existing lots. Jessen asked if the tartway would ever end up being a possible street. Gray said it is a dedicated right-of- way. He said it is called a cartway because of insufficient width, and that additional right-of-way would be needed to make it a public street. Jessen asked if it would be possible to require that the existing drive to County Road 1 be abandoned at such time as another cut is made along there. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve Resolution No. 92-41 app,oving subdivision of the north • 1/2 of Lot 4, Block 2, Eden Heights, with the condition that an access agleement be concluded in order to allow futu,e access and right-of-way. Motion carried with Pidcock abstaining. MOTION: pidcock moved, seconded by Ande,son, to applove Resolution No. 92-39 app,oving subdivision of Lot 9, Block 1, Eden Heights. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. REPORTS OF APVISORY BOARpS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES Ther'3 were none. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. Rpassessment of parcels Pidcock said she would like Staff to follow up on the request from Senior Citizens for ~enches alona trails. She said she would like a repolt back in a month or so on that issue. Pidcock asked Pauly to review the statu':;; of th·..:' reassessment of the Ruzic ploperty. Pauly said that was ,eversed in the COUlt of Appeals and • • • • City Council Meeting 14 11arch 10, .., "-.,(-,,.-,, .l j ;!..:.. remanded to the District Court for a trial to determine whether the assessment agreement is valid. He said the assessment is still standing, based on the assessment agreement. He said ~he only issue before the District Court is whether Mr. Ruzic freely and with full knowledge entered into the assessment agreement. Pidcock asked if there are other properties in the City that would be in the same situation. Pauly said we have used assessment agreements extensively, as have other communities. Tenpas asked if Pauly thought this was an unusual case. Pauly said it was very unusual. He said the Court of Ap~eals has upheld the integrity and validity of assessment agreements; however, if such agreements are reached by means of unfair treatment or trickery, a resident could appeal the assessment on that basis. 2. Guidelines f0r Appointments to Commissions ? ~, . Pidcock said she would like Staff to begin work on establishing written guidelines on appointments to commissions by determining what other cities have established as their procedures. The consensus was to have Staff proceed with that investigation. Ethics Pidcock said she had requested sometime ago that Staff check into what other cities have done regarding a Code of Ethics for their City Councils and Commissions. Jullie said that issue was touched on at one of the workshops, but Staff can do something further and report back to the Council. 4. Report on the League of Cities Convention Jessen reported on the recent convention held in Washington, D.C. that he and Jullie attended. 5 . 11 e t r 0 pol ita n F n vir 0 n men tal Qua lit v Or q ani 73 t iJ n i-'< ': Hoc Group .c';nder"son said he attended a meetin:] in Cagan of EQUAL, the environmental quality organization. :~~ said the group heard the Mayor of Eagan spedk on their water quality management ordinance which is believed to be the best such ordinance in tho state. He asked Staff to report on l'Jhere W·3 .:)",::, on our water quality ordinance. City Council Meeting 15 B . Report of City Manager 1 . Board of Review Qptinns Jullie reviewed the four alternatives for the composition of the 1992 Board of Review outlined in the Staff memorandum of February 5th. Jullie said they would recommend that the Council appoint a three-person panel made up of people who have expertise in real estate value. Tenpas said he would be somewhat uncomfortable if there were no elected official serving on the Board. Jessen asked if their action would be final ~ithin the City. Jullie said that was correct. Harris suggested that Staff return with the names of three persons who might serve on the Board. The other councilmembers concurred with that. 2. Structure for City Charter Study Committee • Referring to the Staff memo of March 6th on the City Charter Study, Jullie said they can move • ahead on the study of this if the Council agrees. Jessen said he would like to study this issue at a workshop session. The consensus was to put this on the agenda of a future WOj-kshop session. 3. Reyiew Hennepin County's Redistricting Proposal Jullie asked the Council if they would be interested in commenting on the County's redistricting proposal. Harris said she would much prefer to see the City remain as one unit and could see DQ value to the proposal to split off the northern :;:::ection of the City. Anderson said he would be in the area that would be s p lit off and he \.'.1 a u 1 d pre f e j-to k "" e p the? Cit >' as one. The consensus ~\Jas that the City (rnai II ciS <'0' unit. Tenpas asked Jullie to write d letter to the County stating that the Council unanimously prefers to stay as one unit. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to contInue the meeting to 11:45 PM. Motion carried unanimously. • • • • City Council Meeting 16 4. Expansion of Liquor Stores Referring to the Staff memo of March 5th, Jullie said we are ready to move ahead with the opening of store No.3 at Prairieview Center. Jessen asked to what extent the price changed. Tenpas responded that we got three free months rent. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the opening of a Liquor Store at the Prairieview Center and to direct tile City Atto'l-ney to review and approve the draft lease for the space. Motion carried unanimously_ 5. Schedule for Council/Staff Workshops The consensus was to continue with outside sites for the workshops. A discussion followed regarding possible dates for the workshops. C. Report of Directo;-of par k;~! ReC'I-eat ion 3, t'lai-,!!r", l Resourc:es There was no report. D. Report of Director of Planning There was no report. E. Report of Director of Public Works There was no report. F. Report of City AttorneY There was no report. XI. OTHER BUSINESS There was none. IV. ADJOlJRI,!MfNT MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjourn the meetina at 11:40 PM. Motion carried unanimously_ • • • • CITY QF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST Apri 1 7, 1992 cmnRACTO~ (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Gina Maria's, Inc. . Hy-Tek f·1aterial Handl ing, Inc. R. V. Johnson Construction, Inc. Marksman Construction Co. Rafco Construction Company Space Control, Inc. of St. Paul Timberland Builders Tyrol Builders, Inc. PLUMBING American Plumbing A Handy Plumbing Corp. OMS Plumbing Services, Inc. Dave's Professional Plumbing Grupa t1echanical Main Line Plumbing, ·Inc. Martin Plumbing & Heating Quality #1 Plumbers.& Remodelers Lee Stull Plumbing TEK Mechanical, Inc. Whelan Company, Inc. REFUSE HAULER Admiral Waste Management, Inc. CLASS A GAr·1BUNG Hockey Association of Eden Prairie City of Lakes Chapter, Sweet Adelines GAS FITTER Ace Mechanical Services, Inc. Cokley Plumbing TEK r1echanical, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATI~G Ace Mechanical Services, Inc. J & R Refrigeration Martin Plumbing & HeatiQq TEK Mechancial, Inc. ~ill's Heating Service TYPE A FOOD Jerry Enterprises (Cub Food) 3.2 BEER OFF SALE Jerry Enterprises (Cub Food) CIGARETTE Jerry's Enterprises (Cub Food) PEI)DLER Steven Matthew Braun (Aerial photo of hom( Mitchell Ross Whyte (Blue Bell Ice Cream) TYPE B FOOD & FOOD VEHICLE B1 ue Bell Ice Cream been approved by the department heads responsible for the • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-53 RESOLUTION PROHmTIITNGPAruaNGON ROWLAND ROAD WHERAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C.52-067 (MSA 181-118-01) Rowland Road and has presented said plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on those portions of said Project I.C. 52-067 (MSA 181-118-01) within its corporate limits. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk (f;OO • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-70 RESOLUTIONPROHmTIITNGPAruGNGON DELL ROAD -CASCADE DRIVE TO WEST 82ND STREET WHERAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-160 (MSA 181-113-01) Dell Road (Cascade Drive to West 82nd Street) and has presented said plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on those portions of said Project I.C. 52-160 (MSA 181-113-01) within its corporate limits. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk &0/ • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-71 ~OLUTIONPROHffiITINGPAruGNGON DELL ROAD -T.R. 5 TO TWILIGHT TRAIL WHERAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-126 (MSA 181-108-03) Dell Road (T .R. 5 to Twilight Trail) and has presented said plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking . on those portions of said Project I.C. 52-126 (MSA 181-108-03) within its corporate limits. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: Mary Krause, Project Engineer \A ~ DATE: April 1, 1992 SUBJECT: I.C. 52-250 1992 City Street Sweeping (Resolution No. 92-54) Two bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on March 26, 1992 for the 1992 City Street Sweeping. Bid results are as follows:. CONTRACTOR Clean Sweep, Inc. Allied Blacktop Company BID AMOUNT $18,183.75 $18,183.75 The bidders submitted equal bids of $18,183.75 each based on $55.95 per hour; however, Allied Blacktop is not available to do the sweeping until April 27 which is beyond the date called out in the specifications. Clean Sweep is available April 6 in accordance with specifications and would begin April 8. The consequences of beginning sweeping April 27 would be delaying other street maintenance such as crack filling and seal coating beyond their scheduled start dates since this work cannot begin until street sweeping is complete. These delays are not desirable. Therefore, it is recommended that the Council award Improvement Contract 52-250 to Clean Sweep, Inc. in the amount of $18,183.75 ($55.95 per hour) based on the bid amount and being in the best interests of the City. MK:ssa IC 52-250 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-54 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 52-250 -City Street Sweeping bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to CLEAN SWEEP, INC. as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with Clean Sweep. Inc .. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $ 18.183.75 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. " Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk e e· e • • Bidder MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: ~ . Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: April 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Bid Summary for Mid Size Utility Tractor with MFD In the 1992 budget money was appropriated for the purchase of 4-wheel-drive tractor estimated to cost approximately $46,500. The staff has drawn up specifications for such a tractor and has received bids from four bidders. The purpose for this tractor is to be used in the area of park maintenance for year-round tasks and these tasks would occur on turf and ice surface areas. Within the specifications it was noted that this unit would be driven over city streets do to a multitude of jobs and that traffic safety was a prime factor in evaluation of bids that were submitted. A summary of the bids is as follows: Bond BrandlModel Price Options Trueman-Welters cashier check $2,300 Case 5120-W 510 Loader $45,496 A $2,590 Matejcek cashier check $2,250 Case 5120-W 510 Loader $44,900 Scharber 5% bid bond John Deere-2755-W 245 Loader $38,875 Long Lake Ford "No Bid"was Received from Long Lake Ford Option Key: A. -. D. Front mounted -Category II, three point hitch Quick attach pallet forks Grapple attachment for 72" bucket Dual batteries and block heater for winter starting B 925 C 1,400 D 115 A $2,643 B 1,287 C 1,392 D 80 A $2,750 B 428 C 1,364 D stand equip Based on the preliminary evaluatiop of cost, the Scharber bid was the lowest, however, in reviewing the bids specifications that were sent to the bidders, the John Deere tractor that was • bid does not meet the specifications in the following areas: 1. This tractor does not have a power shift transmission. 2. The cab only has one side door. Both of these issues are of primary concern when evaluating the tractor as to its application within our park system. The major reason that a power shift transmission was required in the specifications is that this feature makes the tractor shift similar to an automatic transmission, which allows the operator to get up to road speed more efficiently and quickly. This reduces the amount of time necessary to travel from site to site, as well as providing operator safety while being transported from park location tg park location. Also, the John Deere tractor does not meet the specification called for as a two door cab, which gives the operator greater latitude going in and out of the equipment, as well as providing a second escape route should a rollover accident occur. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff conducted considerable research into the operation and specifications necessary for the mid size tractor with mechanical front wheel drive. It is our recommendation that the Council approve the bid submitted by Matejcek's in Faribault, MN of $44,900. In addition, the staff • would like to purchase optional tires that would give greater clearance under the tractor for loader operation. The cost for these larger tires is $461, which makes the total cost $45,361. SAF:mdd tractor/stu • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4-92 Normark AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPfER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Office District and be placed in the 1-2 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Office District and shall be included hereafter in the 1-2 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly . • SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of April 7, 1992, entered into between Normark Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 10th day of March, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of April, 1992. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ~LISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of _______ , 1992. &01 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Lot 2, Block 1, TECHNOLOGY PARK 4TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (f)Z • • • Normark • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of April 7, 1992, by NORMARK CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Office to 1-2 on 3.77 acres with variances as approved by the Board of Appeals, and Site Plan Review on 3.77 acres for construction of a 48,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse building, all said 3.77 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #4-92, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development,and maintenance of said Property as follows: • • 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 10, 1992, revised and dated February 28, 1992, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3.' STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any fmal plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Said plans shall include details regarding alternate construction methods for sewer and water connection to the existing stubs in order to save trees on the Property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 4. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT AND TREE REPLACEMENT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property, which will include the following amongst other conditions and requirements: A. Mitigation of tree loss on the Property. The Property includes 1,564 caliper inches of trees; 619 caliper inches of trees will be removed from the Property and 172 caliper inches of trees will be removed from City owned lands during construction; Developer agrees to replace 523 caliper inches of trees . ~09 B. Detailed information regarding installation of erosion control fabric for use during construction on the Property. • C. Detailed plans for sodding and seeding of the Property, including scheduled dates for completion. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, said land alteration plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with the tenns and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5 . RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of any pennit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining walls. Upon approval by the Chief Building Official, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, said retaining walls, as approved by the Chief Building Official, concurrent with the grading and utility construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. PROOF OF PARKING AVAILABILITY: Developer and City acknowledge that the fifteenA (15) proof of parking spaces proposed for the Property, depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto,. are not required to be constructed at this time. However, said spaces may be required to be constructed in the future, if it is determined by City, in its sole discretion, that it is necessary. At such time as City, in its sole discretion, may detennine that it is necessary for all, or a portion of, said fifteen (15) proof of parking spaces to be constructed, the following shall occur: A. City shall notify Developer in writing of the need to construct all, or a portion, of said proof of parking spaces. B. Within six (6) months of receipt of written notice from City, Developer agrees to have completed construction of and made available for use, all, or a portion of, said proof of parking spaces, as determined by City, in the located as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 7. FINAL ORDER #92-004: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances from City Code requirements within the Office District for construction on the Property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said approval has been granted through Final Order #92-004, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. • Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order #92-004. • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4-92 Normark AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN THE OFFICE DISTRICT AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPfER 1 AND SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance amends the zoning of land from Office to 1-2 Zoning District located east of Golden Triangle Drive, north of Nine Mile Creek subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: lsI John D. Frane, City Clerk lsI Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of 1992. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-62 Normark A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4-92 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 4-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 4-92, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 331.07 . C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 4-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within twenty days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: lohn D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-65 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL Nonnark FOR NORMARK CORPORATION FOR NORMARK CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS WHEREAS, Normark Corporation has applied for site plan approval of Normark Corporate Headquarters on 3.77 acres for construction of a 48,000 square foot office/warehouse building to be known as Normark Corporate Headquarters on property located east of Golden Triangle Drive, north of Nine Mile Creek zoned 1-2 District by Ordinance No. 4-92 adopted by the City Council on April 7, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its January 27, 1992 Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1992 meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Normark Corporation for Normark Corporate Headquarters for construction of a 48,000 square foot office/warehouse building based on plans dated February 28, 1992, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement between Normark Corporation, a Minnesota corporation and the City of Eden Prairie, dated. ~pril 7, 1992, for said construction. ADOPTED by the City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-51 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the precinct boundaries are changed according to the following descriptions and attached map: Precinct #1 is within the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest comer of Eden Prairie, thence south on Highway 101 to Duck Lake Trail, thence easterly along Duck Lake Trail to Dell Road, thence southerly along Dell Road to Duck Lake Trail, thence easterly along Duck Lake Trail to Duck Lake Road, thence north along Duck Lake Road to W. 62nd Street, thence west along W. 62nd Street to the beginning. Precinct #2 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of W. 62nd Street and Duck Lake Road thence south along Duck Lake Road to Valley View Road, thence easterly along Valley View Road to the Soo Line Railroad, thence northeasterly along the Soo Line Railroad to W. 62nd Street, thence westerly along W. 62nd Street to the beginning. Precinct #3 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of W. 62nd Street and the Soo Line Railroad, thence southwesterly along the Soo Line Railroad to Valley View Road, thence easterly along Valley View Road to the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad (now abandoned), thence northerly along abandoned Railroad right-of-way to W. 62nd Street, thence west along W. 62nd Street to the beginning. Precinct #4 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of W. 62nd Street and the now abandoned Chicago and Northwestern Railroad right-of-way, thence southerly along Railroad right-of-way to Valley View Road, thence easterly along Valley View Road to Baker Road, thence northerly along Baker Road to W. 62nd Street, thence west along W. 62nd Street to the beginning.- Precinct #5 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Duck Lake Trail and the West boundary of Eden Prairie, thence southerly along Westerly boundary of Eden Prairie to the Soo Line Railroad, thence northeasterly along the Soo Line Railroad to Valley View Road, thence northwesterly along Valley View Road to Duck Lake Road, thence easterly and northerly along Duck Lake Road to Duck Lake Trail, thence westerly along Duck Lake Trail to Dell Road, thence northerly along Dell Road to Duck Lake Trail, thence westerly along Duck Lake Trail to the beginning. Resolution No. 92-51 Page 2 of 4 Precinct #6 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the Soo Line Railroad and the western boundary of Eden Prairie, thence south along western boundary to Highway 5, thence east along Highway 5 to the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad (now abandoned), thence northerly along Chicago & Northwestern Railroad to Valley View Road, thence westerly along Valley View Road to the Soo Line Railroad, thence southwesterly along Soo Line Railroad to the beginning. Precinct #7 is within the following described line: Beginning at Valley View Road and the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad (now abandoned), thence southwesterly along Chicago & Northwestern Railroad to Highway 5, thence easterly along Highway 5 to Prairie Center Drive, thence southeasterly along Prairie Center Drive to Technology Drive, thence easterly along Technology Drive to Highway 169, thence northeasterly along Highway 169 to Highway 494, thence northwesterly along Highway 494 to Highway 62, thence westerly along Highway 62 to Baker Road, thence southerly along Baker Road to Valley View Road, thence westerly along Valley View Road to the beginning. Precinct #8 is within the following described line: Beginning of the intersection of Highway 62 and Highway 494, thence southerly and easterly along 494 to the easterly boundary of Eden Prairie, thence north along east boundary line to the northerly boundary of Eden Prairie, thence westerly along northerly boundary to the beginning. Precinct #9 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Highway 5 and the westerly boundary of Hennepin County, thence south along westerly boundary to Pioneer Trail, thence easterly along Pioneer Trail to Eden Prairie Road, thence northerly along Eden Prairie Road to Highway 5, thence westerly along Highway 5 to the beginning. Precinct #10 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Highway 5 and Eden Prairie Road, thence southerly along Eden Prairie Road to Pioneer Trail, thence easterly along Pioneer Trail to Staring Lake Parkway, thence northeasterly along Staring Lake Parkway to Twin Lakes Crossing, thence north and west along Twin Lakes Crossing to Mitchell Road, thence northerly along Mitchell Road to Highway 5, thence westerly along Highway 5 to the beginning. Precinct #11 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Highway 5 and Mitchell Road, thence southerly along Mitchell • • Road to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence easterly and southerly along Anderson Lakes Parkway • to Highway 169, thence northerly and easterly along Highway 169 to Technology Drive, thence westerly along Technology Drive to Prairie Center Drive, thence northerly along Prairie Center Drive to Highway 5, thence westerly along Highway 5 to the beginning. (Pll) • • • Resolution No. 92-51 Page 3 of 4 Precinct #12 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Highway 494 and Highway 169, thence southerly along Highway 169 to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence easterly along Anderson Lakes Parkway to the most easterly intersection with Basswood Road, thence northerly and easterly along Basswood Road to the most northerly intersection of Hidden Oaks Drive, thence easterly and northerly along Hidden Oaks Drive to its intersection with the westerly extension of the lot line between Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Hidden Oaks Plat, thence easterly along said lot line between Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, to the shoreline of Anderson Lake, thence southerly and easterly along shoreline to the easterly boundary of Eden Prairie, thence northerly along easterly boundary of Eden Prairie to Highway 494, thence westerly along Highway 494 to the beginning. Precinct #13 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Mitchell Road, thence southerly along Mitchell Road to Twin Lakes Crossing, thence southerly and easterly along Twin Lakes Crossing to Staring Lake Parkway, thence southerly and westerly along Staring Lake Parkway to Pioneer Trail, thence easterly along Pioneer Trail to Highway 169, thence northerly along Highway 169 to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence westerly and northerly along Anderson Lakes Parkway to the beginning. Precinct #14 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Pioneer Trail and the westerly boundary of Hennepin County, thence southerly along west boundary of Hennepin County to the Minnesota River, thence easterly along the Minnesota River to the East line of the West 112 of Section 35, Township 116, Range 22, thence north along said East line to Riverview Road, thence westerly along Riverview Road to Mooer Lane, thence northerly along Mooer Lane to Silverwood Drive, thence easterly and northerly along Silverwood drive to Homeward Hills Road, thence northerly along Homeward Hills Road to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence westerly along Anderson Lakes Parkway to Highway 169, thence southerly along Highway 169 to Pioneer Trail, thence westerly along Pioneer Trail to the beginning. Precinct #15 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Homeward Hills Road, thence southerly along Homeward Hills Road to Sunnybrook Road, thence easterly along Sunnybrook Road to Olympia Drive, thence northerly along Olympia Drive to Mount Curve Road,thence easterly along Mount Curve Road to Franlo Road, thence northerly along Franlo Road to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence easterly along Anderson Lakes Parkway to the East boundary of Eden Prairie, thence northerly along East boundary to shoreline of Anderson Lake, thence westerly and southerly along the shoreline of Anderson Lake to the easterly extension of the lot line between Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Hidden Oaks Plat, thence westerly along said lot line to Hidden Oaks Drive, thence southerly and westerly along Hidden Oaks drive to the northerly intersection of Hidden Oaks Drive and Basswood Road, thence southerly along Basswood Road to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence westerly along Anderson Lakes Parkway to the beginning. ('IG Resolution No. 92-51 Page 4 of 4 Precinct #16 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Sunnybrook Road and Homeward Hills Road, thence southerly along Homeward Hills Road to Purgatory Creek, thence easterly and southerly along Purgatory Creek to Pioneer Trail, thence easterly and southerly along Pioneer Trail to the East boundary of Eden Prairie, thence north along East boundary to Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence westerly along Anderson Lakes Parkway to Franlo Road, thence southerly along Franlo Road to Mount Curve Road, thence westerly along Mount Curve Road to Olympia Drive, thence southerly along Olympia Drive to Sunnybrook Road, thence westerly along Sunnybrook Road to the beginning. Precinct #17 is within the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of Purgatory Creek and Homeward Hills Road, thence southerly along Homeward Hills Road to Silverwood Drive, thence westerly along Silverwood Drive to Mooer Lane, thence southerly along Mooer Lane to Riverview Road, thence easterly along Riverview Road to the East line of the West 112 of Section 35, Township 116, Range 22, thence southerly along said East line to the Minnesota River, thence easterly and southerly along Minnesota River to the East boundary of Eden Prairie, thence northerly along the East boundary of Eden Prairie to Pioneer Trail, thence westerly along Pioneer Trail to Purgatory Creek, thence • northerly and westerly along Purgatory Creek to the beginning. • ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEpmCOUNTY,~OTA RESOLUTION #92-61 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZmG THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE'S PARTICIPATION IN THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S (MHFA) MINNESOTA CITIF.S PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPp) WHEREAS, The City of Eden Prairie is eligible to participate in the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's (MHFA) Minnesota Cities Participation Program (MCPP) for the purpose of assisting first time home buyers in purchasing homes in Eden Prairie. WHEREAS, By participating in the MCPP the City will allow MHF A to access the City of Eden Prairie's local government bond authority to sell bonds on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. WHEREAS, The proceeds from MHFA's sale of mortgage revenue bonds will be used to provide below market financing to low and moderate income first time home buyers. WHEREAS, MHFA will incur bond issuance expenses that would have normally been incurred by cities.selling their own bonds. WHEREAS, The City'S total bond request will be $4,000,000. • WHEREAS, The fee charged to the City by MHF A for participating in the MCPP will be $100 for $500,000 allocated to Eden Prairie, or $800, if the City receives $4,000,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that the City of Eden Prairie will participate in the MHFA's Minnesota Cities Participation Program and Authorizes the City Manager to execute the MHF A Mortgage Revenue Allotment Agreement and Program Application-Commitment Agreement. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: David Lindahl, Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 25, 1992 SUBJECf: PARTICIPATION IN 1992193 MINNESOTA CITIF.S PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPp). Request to Council: The Council is requested to approve resolution 92-61, authorizing the City's participation in the 1992/93 Minnesota Cities Participation Program (MCPP), and the execution of all related agreements. Backuound: The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is again sponsoring the MCPP, which was developed in 1990 to help communities provide home ownership opportunities to first time buyers. MHFA sells bonds on behalf of cities to provide low-interest mortgage financing for low and moderate income first time home buyers. These loans are originated by private mortgage lenders interested in taking part in the program. Eden Prairie Participated in the MCPP program in 1991192. 1991 Promm HiWli~hts: 1991 Bond Allocation Total Loans Sold Interest Rate Eligibility Requirements Types of Units Sold Range of Sale Prices 1992 City Participation: 1992 Demand $664,297. Nine (9); all funds were committed by March 1, 1992. 7.87% through January 1991. MHFA refinanced bonds in February and obtained lower rate of 7.45%. Four loans were sold at the 7.874% rate, and five at 7.45%. Income less than $35,600. Applicants must be first time buyers. Maximum purchase price was $97,840. Four single family; three townhouses; and two condominiums. $38,800 -$89,890. Eden Prairie is again eligible to apply for the MCPP program. Since mid-March, staff has accumulated a list of about thirty people interested in applying for this Program. Demand for the Program is increasing, particularly with the current high cost of • • 1992 Bond Request housing. • $4,000,000 (maximum request). The average loan amount in • • • Income Limits Maximum Purchase Price Pardcipaling Lenders Bond Allocation Participation Fee 1991 was about $70,000. Using this to calculate demand based on a waiting list of thirty people, $2,100,000 would be needed. Communities that applied for the maximum request of $4,000,000 in 1991, only received $1,457,189, since the total requests for funding exceeded available funds by 130 percent. Assuming the same communities participate in 1992, with some cities increase their funding request, Eden Prairie will probably receive between $1,000,000 and $1,500,000. $38,400 $97,840, but expected to increase in June. First Banks in Eden Prairie delivered the program in 1991. Staff will contact a1llocal mortgage lenders for interest in delivering the 1992/93 Program. The loans will be disbursed by designated lenders on a first come first serve bases. A lottery system will be used if the number of applications received exceeds the total allocation for. any given lender. The final bond allocations will be negotiated and finalized in May, 1992, at the MHFA offices in St. Paul. All communities participating in the 1992 MCPP must pay a fee of $100 for every $500,000 allocated to their community. The fee is required to help MHF A reduce the administrative costs associated with providing this program. If Eden Prairie receives $4,000,000, the participation fee will be $800. Eden Prairie will probably receive about $1,500,000 in MCPP funds, with the participation fee being about $300 • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-59 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer through S.R.F., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-160 -Dell Road between Cascade Drive and West 82nd Street and has presented such plans and specificatio~s to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., May 14, 1992, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, May 19, 1992, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-60 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer through B.R.W., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-126 -Dell Road Between TH 5 and Twilight Trail and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., May 14, 1992, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, May 19, 1992, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-72 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer through B.R.W., Inc., has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 52-126 -Dell Road Between TH 5 and Twilight Trail Shoofly Grading and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. • 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement • shall be published for 1 week, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., April 20, 1992, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, April 21, 1992, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5 % (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • \ -MEMORANDUM- • '1'0: Mayor and City Council • • THROUGH: FROM: Carl Jullie, City Manager Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works A. March 26, 1992 {f1 DATE: SUBJECT: Columbine Road Extension adjacent to Wal-Mart At the April 7, 1992 Council meeting, the Tax Increment Financing public hearing will reconvene to discuss the Columbine Road extension. This project will be acted on in advance of final consideration of other projects because of time commitments included in the agreement with Wal-Mart. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you additional status of the proposal. The project has three primary components as follows: ALPINE CENTER RELATIONSHIP Attached is a copy of a proposal to Lariat Companies and a copy of their response regarding the access and relationship to Columbine Road for the Alpine Center project. The terms of the arrangement are fair for all and will allow the project to proceed. DESIGN AND CONTRACTUAL ISSUES In accordance with the agreement with Wal-Mart, the firm BRW, Inc. is preparing plans for two projects. One project will be for the median opening at Columbine Road and Prairie Center Drive. This project will be publicly bid by City staff prior to construction. As noted in the correspondence with the Lariat Companies, this median opening is an important aspect to that agreement. J'he second project that BRW, Inc. is designing is the balance of Columbine Road, which will be bid and constructed by Wal-Mart. The City of Eden Prairie expects to have some participation in the cost of this segment of the roadway and the method of contracting for the project will depend on the amount of the City'S share of the project. SCHEDULE The actual bid opening dates for the project have not been determined at this time. However, the work listed above is expected to be performed during the construction seaSon of 1992. The one issue that needs early resolution is the authorization of the projects so that TIP monies can be used to purchase the right-of-way. In accordance with the agreement with Wal-Mart, the expected closing date was March 1, but is now anticipated for early April. At this point, the attorney for Wal-Mart is preparing documentation for the City attorney to review. CONCLUSION The Planning staff and the City Engineer were able to negotiate an agreement with the owners of the Alpine Center project that will be of benefit to all parties involved. This paves the way for implementation of the Columbine Road project that is expected to be completed in 1992. The City Council will be asked at the public hearing on April 7 to approve the project to allow for expenditure of TIP monies. With that approval in place, the project should remain on schedule. EAD:ssa Gf) tj City of Eden Prairie City Offices 7600 Executive Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677. Telephone (612) 937-2262 January 17, 1992 Ms. Julie Skarda Lariat Companies 11800 Singletree Lane, 'Suite 218 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Julie: Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you to discuss the extension of Columbine Road and the effect on Lariat Center II. It has been helpful to discuss Mr. Flaherty's concerns regarding the cost of the existing retaining wall and what he wants for compensation if the City wishes to proceed with the Columbine Road extension. In response to your recent letter which stated that the tenants favored the proposal and that Mr. Flaherty may be willing to accept in kind compensation, we had BRW prepare a preliminary cost estimate for the work that we propose according to the plan dated October 31, 1991. BRW estimated that it would cost about $29,000 to salvage 2,257 square feet or about one-half of the existing Allan block and to reconstruct the new retaining wall. Per square foot, this cost is about $12.85 whichi~ comparable to constructing a new wall. The total cost of the service area relocation project would be $44,060 which includes $15,159 for landscaping. Based on this, we propose the following: 1. . The City will construct the BRW plan for relocating· the service area for Lariat Center II (as part of the Columbine Road construction) dated October 31, 1991, at an estimated . cost of $44,060. This cost includes the reconstruction of the retaining wall and landscaping only. No costs associated with this project or the extension of Columbine Road will be assessed to Lariat Center II. If a cash payment is desired, one option would be to reduce the amount of landscaping between Green Mill and Prairie Center Drive by one-half. This would allow the City to make a cash payment to Lariat Companies of $7,500. 2. The City will allow tenant signage on the rear of the building. This is subject to the existing signage criteria for Lariat Center II and City Code. 3. The City will work with you to obtain additional patio seating for Green Mill while assuring adequate parking. '.' • • • • Julie Skarda Lariat Companies January 17, 1992 Page 2 J f Benefits to the Center with the extension of Columbine Road and the relocation of the service area includes: 1. The extension of Columbine Road will allow for the construction of a safe access to the service area thereby eliminating any trucks backing up onto Prairie Center Drive. This will put Lariat Companies in compliance with the Developer's Agreement for Lariat Center II dated March 28, 1990, Item 10 which states that: 2. 3. A. No parking shall be allowed at the rear of the proposed structure. B. The size of vehicles which access the rear of the proposed structure shall be limited to those which are able to complete a U-turn within the area at the rear of the proposed structure. C. Delivery vehicles shall be prohibited from backing on or off of Prairie Center Drive. Regardless of whether Columbine Road is extended, a resolution to the problem of trucks backing out onto Prairie Center Drive must be reached. Increased vi~ibility and accessibility due to the construction of a major intersection at Prairie Center Drive and Columbine Road. This intersection will ultimately be signalized. The patio area for Green Mill is enhanced due to the removal of the existing service drive, the relocation of the dumpster, and increased landscaping and green space. We appreciate your willingness to work with us and we are very open to further discussion. Sincerely, C~~ ... Chris Enger Director of Planning February 24, 1992 Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 Dear Chris, I have discussed your proposal with Mr. Flaherty. He is willing to allow the city to proceed according to the following terms: 1. As you had proposed, the city will construct the BRW plan for relocating the service area for Lariat Center II dated October 31, 1991. No cost associated with the project or the extension of Columbine Road will be at any time assessed to Lariat Center II. 2. A cash payment in the amount of Five Thousand and no/IOO Dollars ($5,000.00) will be made to Lariat Companies, Inc. 3. As per your proposal, the city will allow tenant signage on the rear of the building and will work to obtain additional patio seating for Green Mill. I want to thank you for taking the time to discuss the history and goals of the project with us. Sincerely yours, LARIAT COMPANIES, INC. f J ,{) ,-,) Q J& J({~da Executive Vice President JAS:kda 11800 Singletree Lane· Suite 210· Eden Prairie. MN 55344. (612) 943-1404 • • • • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Carl Julie, City Manager DATE: April 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Tax Increment District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Improvements described in the 1992 Amendment of Development Program for Development District No. 1 and the 1992 Amendment of Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment District Nos. 1,2,3,4,5, 6 and 7 have been contemplated at least since the early 1970's and efforts have been made to construct the improvements through local improvement special assessments to benefited lands procedure or through other private investment alternatives. Accomplishing this objective has met with only limited success with respect to a small part of the project. Improvements to street and highway access, traffic flow and the water supply has not historically been within the capability of private investment and there is no indication in the light of present economic conditions that private investment could, in the reasonably foreseeable future, cause the improvements to be made. Improvements to the street and highway access, traffic flow, water supply and public parks are necessary in order to permit additional development to occur within Development District No.1. The proposed development activity will encourage private development of property within the Development District thereby increasing employment and the tax base of the City and overlapping tax jurisdictions. Carl J. Jullie, City Manager -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Carl I. lulie, City Manager FROM: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer DATE: April 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Tax Increment District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 I or the persons on my staff have inspected the locations for the proposed project described in Exhibit A to the 1992 Amendment of Development Program for Development District No. 1 and 1992 Amendment of Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. The project described therein is wholly contained within the boundaries of Development District No. 1. Under the general plan for development of the City the Districts are zoned so as to permit the uses proposed by the Amended Development Program. The proposed project conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Alan D. Gray, City Engineer e e· e • • • 3.04. This council hereby ratifies and confirms that the Plan Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of each of the Districts by private enterprise. The development activities contemplated in the Program Amendment would provide an opportunity for a significant increase in employment opportunities in the City and enhance the tax base of the City. 3.05. The City Finance Director/Clerk has advised the Council that the Plan Amendments should have included Tax Increment District No.1, which was inadvertently omitted from the Plan Amendment. The amendments affecting Tax Increment District No. 1 would not, by themselves, have required a public hearing. Therefor, the Plan Amendment is hereby modified to include Tax Increment District No.1. 3.06. Upon review of the Plans, the information elicited at the public hearing and on the basis of the findings in Sections 3.01 to 3.04, this Council hereby approves the Plan Amendment as modified. Section 4. Filing. The Finance Director/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment with the Commissioner of Revenue as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2. Mayor Attest: Finance Director/Clerk After some discussion, Councilmernber __________________ _ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 92-46 RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7; ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. On September 22, 1981, this Council designated under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, as amended, certain land within the City as Development District No. 1 (the "Development District") and adopted a Development Program therefor. The Development Program was subsequently amended by this Council on March 30, 1982, May 17, 1983 and April 17, 1990 (as so amended, the "Original Program"). Pursuant to the • Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended (the "Act"), this Council has established Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 (collectively, the "Districts") within the Development • District and has adopted and in some cases amended Tax Increment Financing Plans therefor (as originally adopted or, if amended, as so amended, the "Original Plans") on the dates indicated below: Tax Increment Date of Adoption District No, or Amendment 1 9/2/81; amended 3/30/82 and 5/17/83 2 3/30/82; amended 5/17/83 and 4/17/90 3 11/16/82; amended 5/17/83 and 4/17/90 4 3/15/83; amended 5/17/83 and 4/17/90 5 5/17/83; amended 4/17/90 6 8/16/83; amended 4/17/90 7 4/17/84; amended 4/17/90 • • • • 1.02. It has been proposed that the City further amend its Development Program (the "Program Amendment") in order to undertake additional development activities and to amend the Original Plans (the "Plan Amendment") to provide a means of financing the capital and administrative costs to be incurred by the City in undertaking the development activities authorized by the Program Amendment. The Program Amendment has been transmitted to the planning agency of the City, which has determined that the Original Program as amended and supplemented by the Program Amendment (as so amended and supplemented, the "Program") conforms to the general plan for the development of the City. 1.03. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.126 and 469.175, the adoption of the Program Amendment and Plan Amendment is for the consideration of this Council. On March 17, 1992, this Council conducted a public hearing on the desirability of adopting the Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment. Notice of the public hearing was duly published as required by law in the Eden Prairie News, the official newspaper of the City on March 5 , 1992. 1.04. Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 272 and the Board of Education of Independent District No. 287 were given an opportunity to meet with the City and comment on the Plan Amendment. At lease 30 days before the public hearing the City provided the county and the school district boards with information on the fiscal and economic implications of the Plan Amendment. Section 2. Adoptioo of Program Amendmeot. On the basis of the proposed Program Amendment prepared by officers of the City and the information elicited from consultation with the planning agency and at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 2.01. The Council hereby ratifies and confirms its determination that there is a need for new development in the area of the City encompassed by the Development District to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state. The Program Amendment proposes that the City undertake certain additional public highway, street, water system and park improvements to encourage the development of land in the Development District. The Council hereby finds that the proposed development activities tot be undertaken pursuant to the Program Amendment would improve the Development District by encouraging private development of property therein, thereby increasing employment and the tax base of the City and overlapping tax jurisdictions. It is in the best interests of the City to adopt the Program Amendment . 2.02. Upon review of the Program, the information elicited from the planning agency and at the public hearing, and on the basis of the findings made in Section 2.01, this Council hereby adopts the Program Amendment and orders that it be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 3. Approyal of Plan Amendment. On the basis of the Plan Amendment and the information elicited at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 3.01. The Plan Amendment provides the means to finance the costs of the additional public highway, street, water system and park improvements to be undertaken pursuant to the Program Amendment. The Original Plans, as amended and supplemented by the Plan Amendment (as so amended and supplemented, the "Plans") contain a statement of objectives-for the improvement of the Development District, a statement as to the development program for the respective District and a statement of the property within the Development District which the City intends to acquire. The Plans also estimate the capital and administrative costs of the Development District, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, the sources of revenues to finance or otherwise pay public costs of the respective District, the captured net tax capacity of the respective District at completion and the duration of the District. The Plans also describe and identify the • development activities to be undertaken or expected to be • undertaken in each District. The Plan Amendment further contains an estimate of the impact of the proposed tax increment financing on the net tax capacities of all taxing jurisdictions in which each District is located. All the captured tax capacity is necessary for the objectives of each District. 3.02. This Council hereby finds based on a Memorandum of the City Manager that the proposed development of the Development District to be encouraged pursuant to the Program Amendment would not, in the opinion of this Council, occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is necessary. Improvements to the street and highway access traffic flow and water supply are necessary in order to permit additional development to occur within the Development District. 3.03. This Council hereby finds based on a Memorandum of the City Engineer that the Plans conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Under the general plan for the development of the City the Districts are zoned so as to permit the uses proposed by the Program Amendment. • • • • 1992 AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 and 1992 AMENDMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 MARCH 17, 1992 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA I. INTRODUCTION The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota ~ (the "City") has determined that there is a need for the development of an area of the City designated as Development District No.1 (the "Development District"), and has adopted a development program therefor, dated September 22, 1981 and subsequently amended on March 30, 1982, May 17, 1983 and April 17, 1990 (as so amended, the "Original Program"), for development of the Development District. It is now necessary to amend the Original Program to provide for further actions to be taken in furtherance of development in the Development District. The actions to be taken by the City pursuant to this 1992 Amendment to Development Program (the "Program Amendment") are necessary to secure the development of the property included in the Development District at this time and in a manner which will best meet those needs. In order to finance the capital and administration costs to be incurred by the City in connection with the Development District, the City adopted, and in certain cases modified, on the dates indicated below tax increment financing plans (as so modified, the "Original Plans") for the following Tax Increment Districts (collectively, the "Districts"): Tax Increment Date of Adoption Tax Increment Date of Adoption QistI::ict No. OI:: MQdificatiQo DistI::ict No. OI:: Mocificatioo 1 9/22/81; modified 5 5/17/83; modified 3/20/82 and 5/17/83 4/17/90 2 3/20/82; modified 6 8/16/83; modified 5/17/83 and 4/17/90 4/17/90 3 11/16/82; modified 7 4/17/84; modified 5/17/83 and 4/17/90 4/17/90 4 3/15/83; modified 5/17/83 at 4/17/90 It is now necessary to amend the Original Plans by the following Plan Amendment to authorize additional expenditures to be financed with tax increment revenues. The Plan Amendment will not authorize the incurrence of additional bonded indebtedness or change the boundaries or the legal duration of any of the Districts. The Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment are adopted by the City Council of the City pursuant to the Development District Act, now codified at Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, as amended, and the Tax Increment Financing Act, now codified at Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended. e· e • • • II. 1992 AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 A. Development Activities. The Development Activities are contained in Section 1.5 of the Original Program and are amended to include the 1992 Project, described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. Land Use Considerations. The public facilities described in Section A are financially feasible and compatible with long-range development plans. Acquisition of rights-of-way and easements for the improvements described in Section A will provide impetus for private development within the Development District. C. Environmental Controls. It is presently anticipated that the Development Activities proposed in the Development District as set forth in this Program Amendment will not present major environmental problems. All municipal actions, public improvements and private development will be carried out in a manner that will comply with applicable environmental standards. D. Estimated Cost of 1992 Project. Estimated costs associated with the 1992 Project are $17,100,000, including, acquisition, relocation, demolition and site clearance costs, public improvement costs, the cost of professional services for planning, design, engineering and appraisals, contingencies, and administration costs calculated at 5%. The elements and the costs of the 1992 Project shown above are estimated to be necessary based upon the best engineering and cost information now available. It is anticipated that the elements of the costs of the 1992 Project may decrease or increase, but that the total costs will not exceed the amount shown above. E. Effect of Program Amendment. Except as amended and supplemented by this Program Amendment, the Original Program remains in full force and effect and its provisions apply to the provisions of this Program Amendment, except to the extent amended or supplemented hereby. III. PLAN AMENDMENTS A. Estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992 Project. The estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992 Project will not be greater than the estimated Capital and Administrative Costs set forth in the Original Plans . -2- B. Pa~ment of Capital and Administratiye Costs. 1. In General. All Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992 Project will be paid from Tax Increment derived from the Districts. The City reserves the right to levy special assessments to finance in whole or in part the costs of the 1992 Project. 2. Bonded Indebtedness To Be Incurred. No indebtedness evidenced by Tax Increment Bonds will be incurred in connection with the 1992 Project. The City reserves the right to issue Special Assessment Bonds to pay, if necessary, costs of the 1992 Project. C. Fiscal and Economic Implications of Plan Amendment. The Plan Amendment has no fiscal and economic implication apart from those specified in the Original Plans since the Capital and Administrative Costs will not be greater than those set forth in the Original Plans. D. Effect of Plan Amendment. Except as amended and supplemented by this Plan Amendment, each of the Original Plans remains in full force and effect and its provisions apply to the respective provisions of this Plan Amendment, except to the extent amended or supplemented hereby. • This Program Amendment and this Plan Amendment were • adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota on the 17th day of March, 1992. Mayor Attest: City Clerk -3-• • • • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5 . 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. EXHIBIT A 1992 PROJECT LIST DESCRIPI10N Signals a. Intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Franlo Road b. Intersection of Columbine Road and Prairie Center Drive c. Intersection of Singletree Lane and Prairie Center Drive d. Intersection of Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive e. Intersection of Plaza Drive and Prairie Center Drive f. Intersection of Plaza Drive and Valley View Road g. Intersection of Technology Drive and Mitchell Road h. Intersection of Fountain Place and T.H. 169 i. Ramp terminals at 1-494 and Valley View Road j. Ramp terminals at 1-494 and Prairi~ Center Drive Medcom Boulevard Extension from Joiner Way to Franlo Road West 78th Street, widened to four lanes from Prairie Center Drive to CSAH 18 Technology Drive, widened to four lanes from Prairie Center Drive to CSAH 169 Valley View Road improved to urban section and construct permanent creek crossing, northeast of Flying Cloud Drive Columbine Road Extension to Prairie Center Drive Singletree Lane widening and addition of tum lanes between Eden Road and T.H. 169 Leona Road reconstruction to provide new intersection with West 78th Street City cost attributable to the MnDOT project to construct T.H. 212 between 1-494 and Mitchell Road Water system improvements a. New 2,000,000 gallon elevated water storage b. 20" diameter trunk watermain extension between water plant and Prairie Center Drive Permanent street lighting improvements in Major Center Area a. Prairie Center Drive f. West 78th Street b. Technology Drive g. Columbine Road c. Eden Road h. Plaza Drive e. Valley View Road 1. Singletree Lane 12. City share of cost to create Purgatory Recreation Area Park improvements west of Prairie e Center Drive 13. Projects identified in the 1985 BRW Traffic Study a. Additional tum lanes on Bryant Lake Drive at Valley View Road b. Intersection improvements at Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road c. Through lane and intersection improvements on Prairie Center Drive between Viking Drive and West 78th Street d. Additional through lane in each direction on T.H. 169 at Prairie Center Drive and extension of tum lane between T .H. 169 and Joiner Way on Prairie Center Drive e. Intersection improvements at Washington Avenue and Valley View Road 16. Columbine Road extension from Prairie Center Drive to Common Wealth Drive e- e 0-4 • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Alan D. Gray, City FAtgineer ~ ,. DATE: Apri12, 1992 SUBJECT: Heritage Road Traffic Study Attached herewith is the Heritage Road Traffic Study submitted by Benshoof & Associates, Inc. Also enclosed is a petition communicating the opinion of 264 residential units within the study area regarding the closure of Heritage Road . ADG:ssa • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-55 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS • WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 10th day of March, 1992, fixed the 7th day of April, 1992, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 52-194 -Creek Knolls Improvements WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council Hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of April, 1992, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements, with the assistance of H.T.P.O., consulting engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992 Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-56 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 10th day of March, 1992, fixed the 7th day of April, 1992, as the date for a public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 52-189 -Braxton Drive Improvements WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the Council Hearing through two weeldy publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of April, 1992, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIm EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvements, with the assistance of H.T.P.O., consulting engineers. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992 Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • • • Fairfield 1992 Amendment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-13 A RESOLUTION APPROVING mE FAIRFIELD 1992 AMENDMENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL FAIRFIELD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Fairfield 1992 Amendment development is considered a proper amendment to the overall Fairfield Planned Unit Development Concept; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the request of Centex Real Estate. Corporation for PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Fairfield Planned Unit Development Concept for the Fairfield 1992 Amendment development and recommended approval of the PUD Concept Amendment to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 7, 1992; NOW, mEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Fairfield 1992 Amendment development PUD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval to the overall Fairfield 1992 Amendment Planned Unit Development Concept as outlined in the application materials for Centex Real Estate Corporation. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated March 18, 1992. ADOPTED by the City Council of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Fairfield 1992 Amendment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-27 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FAIRFIELD 1992 AMENDMENT FOR CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION BE IT RFBOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Fairfield 1992 Amendment for Centex Real Estate Corporation dated March 18, 1992, consisting of 148.2 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in confonnance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk e e- e • ( • ( • Planning Commission Minutes February 24, 1992 A. FAIRFIELD 1992 AMENDMENT by Centex Real Estate. Planned Unit Development ConCept Amendment on 148.2 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 21.8 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the RI-9.5 District on 21.8 acres, Preliminary Plat of 21.8 acres into 71 single family lots and road right-of-way. LOCATION: North of ~.dlewood Parkway, west of Braxton Drive. Dan Blake, representing Centex Real Estate, stated that this was the last area of development in the Fairfield project. The proposal is for an amendment to the approved plan. Blake noted that Centex was out of RI-9.5 lots to develop and the market was extremely strong in this area currently. Blake added that the original plan was for smaller homes in this area. The biggest issues were related to Scenic Heights Road and future Highway 212 development. Bauer commented that he hoped the developer was showing the proposed location of Highway 212 to potential buyers. Blake replied that potential buyers were show proposed plans for Highway 212 and were required to sign a release which states that they had been informed and understood where Highway 212 would be located . Hawkins asked the depth of the other lots currently along the railroad line. Blake replied approximately 150 feet. Blake added that tracks were not present at this time; however, future use was not known. Franzen reported that Staff recommended approval of the amendment from cluster homes to standard RI-9.5 lots. Bauer asked if the RI-9.5 were within the City's original expectations for Rl-9.5 lots. Franzen noted that the RI-9.5 lots in this plan were the most consistent with the City's original concept for affordable housing. Franzen believed that Centex had been successful with affordable RI-9.5 lots because there was only one builder. When lots are sold off to several builders house size and cost vary. Franzen added that he thought that about 75% of the Rl-9.510ts in the City met the original intent of the RI-9.5 District. Hallett believed that it was important to limit the square footage of Rl-9.5 lots to maintain the original concept by the City. 2 Hawkins noted that in the previous plan there had been a large outlot in the center of the project and questioned what the intent was for the outlot. Blake replied the original intent was for a. totlot to be maintained by a homeowner's association; however, an association does not current! exist. Blake added that there was a park close by and sidewalks and trails had been developed. Hawkins asked how many homes were in the entire project including the 71 in this proposal. Blake replied approximately 334. Hallett commented that there had been a low area along the railroad tracks which held water. Blake stated that this area was within the proposed Highway 212 corridor and to the north of the proposed site. Blake believed that a culvert had been disturbed during highway development which caused the water to stand in this area. . Bauer requested that when a plan had been previously been approved the past minutes be included for the Planning Commission's review. Franzen noted that during the previous proposals there had been no public comments. Kardell concurred that it would be helpful to be allowed to review the previous minutes. Hawkins added that it would help to know if there had been any Staff concerns during the original proposal. Bauer noted that it was not critical for this project, but would like to see minutes provided in the future. Hawkins complimented Staff on a well written Staff Report for this project. MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-1. Norm •. abstained. MOTION 2: Hallett moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Real Estate for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment of the overall Fairfield Planned Unit Development on 148.2 acres, based on plans dated February 18 and 21, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 21, 1992. Motion carried 6-0-1. Norman abstained. MOTION 3: Hallett moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Real Estate for Planned Unit Development District Review, with waivers, and Zoning District Amendment within the RI-9.5 District on 21.8 acres for construction of71 single family homes to be known as Fairfield 1992 Amendment, based on plans dated February 18 and 21, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 21, 1992. Motion carried 6-0-1. Norman abstained. 3 • • • MOTION 4: Hallett moved, seconded by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centex Real Estate for Preliminary Plat of 21.8 acres into 71 single family lots and road right- of-way to be known as Fairfield 1992 Amendment, based on plans dated February 18 and 21, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 21, 1992. Motion carried 6-0-1. Norman abstained . STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning February 21, 1992 Fairfield PUD Amendment 1992 ( North of Stanley Trail, north of Candlewood Parkway, west of County Road 4 Centex Real Estate Corporation 1. 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 148.2 acres. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 21.8 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the RI-9.5 Zoning District on 21.8 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 21.8 acres into 71 single family lots. ·_ •• _d _____ • __ • ___ ·'·_*~~d __ U _____ ~$~ North Location Map • • • • ( Staff Report Fairfield PUD Amendment 1992 February 21, 1992 PLANNED UNIT DEVEWPMENT AMENDMENT This 21.8 acre site is part of the original 148.2 acre, 364 unit Fairfield Planned Unit Development approved in 1988. This portion of the PUD was zoned for 78 RI-9.5 cluster lots at a density of 3.5 units per acre. Centex is requesting a PUD amendment to change from the approved cluster lot concept to standard RI-9.5 zoning. This change would result in a reduction of units from 78 to 71 and a net density of 3.26 units per acre. This 21.8 acre portion of the Fairfield PUD is guided medium density since the density exceeds 2 112 units per acre. The overall density of-the Fairfield PUD based on 148.2 acres is 2.27 units per acre. . RI-9.5 ZONING AMENDMENT This 21.8 acres site was zoned RI-9.5 in 1988. The preliminary plat depicts 71 lots meeting the requirements of the RI-9.5 Zoning District. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REVIEW WITH WAIVERS • The zoning code requires a minimum of a 150 foot lot depth for lots abutting freeways or railroads. Lots 14 -19, Block 1 do not meet this requirement. The minimum lot depth proposed for these lots is 130 feet. It is possible to revise the preliminary plat to meet the 150 foot lot depth requirement, however, this would require a shifting of Shepherd Way to the east which would decrease the lot depths on Block 2. These lots currently are approximately 125 feet in depth. Reducing these lots by 10 feet in depth each could allow the lots abutting the track to meet the 150 foot depth requirement. This would result in lot size variances on Block 2 for Lots 10-15 and 18-21. • The following are reasons for considering lot depths less than 150 feet adjacent to the railroad: 1. 2. 3. The approved PUD had 31 cluster lots located within 150 feet of the railroad. The current proposal has 21 lots. The average depth of the lots adjacent to the railroad is 150 feet. Centex is proposing a landscaping mitigation plan for all lots along the railroad. For the Lots 14-19 which do not meet the minimum 150 foot lot depth, additional plantings could be required to mitigate the lesser setback . 2 ( Staff Report Fairfield PUD Amendment 1992 February 21, 1992 ( The Planning Staff would recommend lot depth waivers based on these conditions. GRADING/TREE LOSS The change in the preliminary plat does not change the overall approved grading plan. Overall site grading is minimal. Overall tree loss was reviewed with the 1988 PUD. This tree loss was approximately 27%. The tree replacement plan was for 1, 130 inches to be spread out over all phases within the PUD. These trees have been planted. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS The 1988 PUD approval required a sidewalk along the loop road within this portion of the PUD. The revised preliminary plat depicts a sidewalk along the entire length of Shepherd Way from Candlewood Parkway to Braxton Drive. There will be sidewalks and trails on both sides of Candlewood Parkway and Braxton Drive. SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD. DELL ROAD. HIGHWAY 212 The preliminary plat has been developed which provides for enough right-of-way for Highway 212 and Scenic Heights Road to be built north of the property. Since some of the lots abut directly onto Scenic Heights Road, a buffer zone should be provided. This is shown on the proposed landscaping plan. This berming and plantings would be consistent with that which has been planted along County Road 1. Scenic Heights Road and Dell Road are part of a feasibility study which has recently received approval by the City Council. Phase one of the feasibility study would be the initial construction of Dell Road south of Highway 5. This could begin late this summer. Phase two of this project would be the east/west road connection or Scenic Heights Road. This construction will likely concur with 212 construction which could begin in 1994. ARCHITECTURAL DIVERSITY This project must continue with the approved architectural diversity plan for the overall PUD. The architectural diversity plan for the Rl-9.5 area required that no two units be alike side by side opposite or diagonally across from each other. 3 • • • • • • ( Staff Report Fairfield PUD Amendment 1992 February 21, 1992 UTILITIES Sewer, water and storm sewer are immediately available adjacent to the site. STORM WATER RUN-OFF The Engineering Department has reviewed the overall grading and drainage plan and made recommendations to revise the plan to reduce the amount of rear yard drainage across adjoining lots. This will require storm sewer pipes across the rear yards. This drainage plan revision will not change the number of lots, lot layout or toad locations. In addition, the storm sewer is proposed to connect to future storm sewer within Scenic Heights Road. Since the time frame for Scenic Heights Road construction has not been established, water is proposed to be drained temporarily into a low area to the north. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for planned unit development concept amendment, planned unit development district review, zoning district amendment and preliminary plat based on plans dated February 21, 1992, subject to the recommendations contained in the Staff Report dated February 21, 1992, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. A modified buffer plan along Scenic Heights Road and the railroad. Additional 10-12 foot conifers and 3 - 4 inch shade tree plantings are needed especially along Lots 14 -19, Block 1 and trees along Lots 1 -13, Block 1 to supplement existing trees which are on the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority right-of-way. B. A revised drainage plan which reduces the amount of rear yard drainage across lots. 2. Prior to final plat, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans to the Watershed District. B. Detailed storm water run-off utility and erosion control plans to the City Engineer. Staff Report 4 Staff Report Fairfield PUD Amendment 1992 February 21, 1992 ( 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Stake the trees to be preserved with a snow fence, provide erosion control and notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Plans for review by the Fire Marshal. B. Provide a security for landscaping along the railroad and Scenic Heights Road. 5. Concurrent with site construction, proponent shall construct sidewalks along Shepherd Way within the project. 6. PUD waivers for lot depth less than 150 feet are granted for Lots 14-19, Block 1. FRFLD92.MDF: bs 5 • • • • • • Victory Lutheran Church CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-63 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Victory Lutheran Church for Victory Lutheran Church requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 6.6 acres from Low Density Residential to Church, east of Eden Prairie Road, west of Red Oak Drive and north of Berger Drive . ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Victory Lutheran Church CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-64 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Victory Lutheran Church for Victory Lutheran Church dated April 2, 1992, consisting of 10 acres into 5 lots for construction of a 7,600 square foot church and 4 new single family lots east of Eden Prairie Road, west of Red Oak Drive and north of Berger Drive, a copy of which is on fIle at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto., and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • • P1arming Ccmnission Minutes January 13, 1992 B. VICTORY LUmERAN CHURCH by Victory Lutheran Church. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 5.9 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Public, and Site Plan Review on 5.9 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the RI-22 District on 3.5 acres, and variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals; Preliminary Plat of 10 acres into 5 lots for construction of a 7,600 square foot church and 4 new single family lots to be known as Victory Lutheran Church. LOCATION: East of Eden Prairie Road, west of Red Oak Drive and north of Bergen Drive. Scott Kipp introduced Pastor Mundahl and architect, Steve Ervin. Ervin complimented Staff on a very thorough job. He added that he and Staff had worked on this project for over a year. Ervin noted that the Church had requested the residential character in architecture. An earth berm had been added along County Road 4 for both acoustical and aesthetic purposes. The parking lot had been developed to provide close access from County Road 4 and to allow for space to provide for future parking needs. Ervin questioned the need for 8 to 10 foot evergreens on the West side of the lot. Ervin added that he would like to work 2 ( ( I \ with sight lines to accomplish the screening. Ervin noted that Item 1 related to the storm water run-off had been resolved after a meeting with the Church, Staff, and the DNR. • Sandstad asked if Item lC would be discussed further. Ervin replied that the Church would prefer to use earth berming. Norman asked Ervin to comment on Item 4 in the letter dated December 23, 1991 from the DNR. Ervin replied that this item was not applicable. Kipp replied that the project could be with the 1000 feet of Red Rock Lake. He added that the impervious surface and be calculated at less than 25 % and was far away from Red Rock Lake. Kipp noted that there would be no visual impact. Hawkins asked if the 25% was calculated on the proposed site or 25% of all land within 1000 feet of the lake. Kipp replied that the figure was 25 % per lot around the entire lake. Sandstad asked if Phase II was taken into consideration to determine the percentage of impervious surface. Kipp replied yes. Kipp reported that the project would have little impact on the surrounding areas. Approximately only 113 to 112 of the property would be disturbed. Kipp believed that the plan worked well with the topography. He added that maximum distances would be maintained from residences. Kipp stated that the traffic would be minimal. The residential character of the architecture blends well with the existing neighborhood. Kipp said that the new access onto County Road 4 would provide for better sight vision and bypass lanes would be added. Staff recommend. that the N.U.R.P. pond be developed to the north. Kipp stated that Staff would be comforta to work with the developer to eliminate the requirement for trees. Hawkins asked to what extent N.U.R.P. ponds had been adopted by Eden Prairie. Kipp replied that Eden Prairie had chosen to develop N.U.R.P. ponds on commercial, industrial, and public property developments over 5 acres. Franzen added that this was not a completely new policy. He stated that water could not be directly discharged into wetland areas. Sandstad noted that he had not seen a tree inventory. Kipp replied that several of the trees would remain and the majority of the trees were boxelder. Sandstad asked if this was part of an agreement with the developer. Kipp replied that he did not regard this as a major issue; he believed it would be in the developers best interest to save the significant trees. Kipp noted that a variance would be required for Lot 4 related to road frontage of 50 feet. Hallett asked if Staff was comfortable with the sidewalk system proposed. Kipp replied that the Park & Recreation Department had reviewed the plan and had accepted the trails as proposed. Hallett asked if the sidewalks would extend further south. Kipp replied yes. Hallett asked if the trail system went completely around Red Rock Lake. Kipp replied that due to the low areas the trail system could not be connected to extend completely around the lake. Hallett asked if 3 • • • • the proposal would be reviewed by the Park & Recreation Department and if they would consider the possibility of a complete trail system around the lake. Hallett requested that this be reviewed further. He said that this was a very beautiful area which residents could not get to. Kipp replied that the plan would be reviewed by the Park & Recreation Department. Hallett asked Staff how the parking requirements had been calculated and if it would be adequate. Kipp replied that Staff used the standard method of calculation; 1 space for every 3 seats. Hallett questioned if the City's method was workable for all Churches and was enough land available on this site to provide for additional parking if needed. Franzen replied that when a church has a regional use the calculation was based on 1 space for every 2.5 seats. Franzen added that this was a small church. Kipp replied that Staff believed that parking provided was adequate but, additional spaces could be provided if necessary. Norman asked if there were other Missouri Synod Churches located in Eden Prairie. Pastor Mundahl replied that this was the only Missouri Synod Church in all of the surrounding cities. Kipp noted that Staff could work with the developer to provide parking based on the 1 space for every 2.5 seats if necessary. Ervin replied that the current membership of the Church was 55. Ervin added that additional proof of parking had been provided and the Church was very aware of the importance of adequate parking. Ervin believed that the topography of the land would discourage parking on Berger Drive and County Road 4. Hawkins noted that the Planning Commission was pointing out that past history had proved that the 1 space for every 3 seats ratio had not always provided for adequate parking. Ervin replied that the proponent had provided proof of parking for additional parking above the required amount. Hallett stated that a question had merely been raised as to the current policies ability to provide adequate parking and if that policy should be updated. Bauer concurred that the current policy for calculations might not be adequate. Ervin stated that he wanted to go on record that it might be in the Church's best interest to go with the ratio of I parking space for every 2.5 seats and that space has been made available for expansion if necessary. Sandstad asked Hallett if he were concerned about trails to the north of this project closer to the marsh area. Hallett replied yes. Kipp believed that it would be a good idea to have a representative from the Parks & Recreation Department attend a Planning Commission meeting to update the Commission on the trail system. Hawkins recommended that all of the Staff recommendations not only include the request for review but also for approval. He requested that the wordage be changed for clarity. 4 ( ( Norman asked when the Church anticipated to begin construction. Pastor Mundahl replied as soon as possible. • Allen Nicklay, 16011 Lake Shore Drive, stated that he was speaking for his wife and himself. He said that they were not in opposition to the project but were concerned about the possible vacation of Lake Shore Drive. Nicklay stated that his driveway would go from the existing 55 feet to over 330 feet. Nicklay was concerned about the upkeep of the driveway. Nicklay said that their property would increase by 114 of an acre with no advantage to them except to increase the length of the driveway and pay additional taxes. Nicklay believed that with the County Road 4 upgrade to 4 lanes with a median cut that traffic would be forced to use Berger Drive more extensively. Nicklay stated that he had met with Staff to request that Lake Shore Drive be left in place and terminate in the Church parking lot or curve to the south and intersect with Berger Drive. Nicklayasked that Staff look at this further. Hawkins asked Nicklay if he had talked with the present property owner to obtain their views on these issues. Nicklay replied yes. Nancy Nicklay, 16011 Lake Shore Drive, stated that the plan as proposed would create personal problems for them. She added that they had asked Mr. Rogers not to sell the property to the church; however, he so declined. Nicklay said that she was not opposed to having a church developed on this property. Hawkins asked if Nicklay if they were co-owners of the property. Nicklay replied that they owned Lot 4. Nicklay was concerned about the possibility of a significant increase in taxes Wi. the increase of 114 of an acre. Sandstad asked Nicklay if she would prefer to see a cul-de-sac. Nicklay replied that their first preference would be a through street and the second would be a cul-de-sac. Nicklay said that during a meeting with Al Gray from the Engineering Department he had said that Lake Shore Drive as a through street was a possibility however, a cul-de-sac was not. She added that at a later meeting with another member from the Engineering Department the first recommendation was a cul-de-sac. Nicklay hoped that the Planning Commission could understand their frustration. Sandstad asked why Lots 2 and 3 could not cul-de-sac to serve the 3 homes. Kipp replied that one of the recommendations made to the Nicklay's was to have Lots 2 and 3 face Lake Shore Drive; a flag lot was considered as well as a through street. Kipp stated that Staff had requested that the Church and the landowners meet and agree on a solution. Kipp noted that a through street would involve extra costs. Sandstad believed that the plan would create negative impacts to the Nicklay property. Norman asked if there were existing homes on Lots 2 and 3. Kipp replied no. Norman asked why a cul-de-sac could not be developed. Kipp replied that a cul-de-sac would only serve 1 lot and there was the question as to who would absorb the cost; was it to be entirely absorbed by the Church. Kipp added that at the time of the drafting of the Staff Report it was believed that 5 • • • • an acceptable solution had been reached between the landowners and the Church. Bauer stated that he did not feel comfortable approving a project that has such a negative impact on an existing property owner. Kipp noted that Lake Shore Drive was a dirt road and was unimproved to this point. Hallett asked where the Church and Mr. Rogers were at regarding this issue. Kipp replied that Staff had not met with Mr. Rogers; the Nicklays had been relaying information from Mr. Rogers. Hawkins asked Nicklay if during the procedures if they were acting as legal representatives for Mr. Rogers or simply communicating information. Nicklay replied they were only conveying information. Ervin stated that he and the Church had been in contact with the Nicklay's during the proceedings and believed that the current plan had been acceptable. Ervin added that he was surprised at the events tonight. Ervin asked Nicklay what the exact problem was. Nicklay replied that the problem was with the additional taxes that they would be responsible for for the rest of their lives and the maintenance of the extra driveway. Franzen stated that alternative plans for access were being discussed and Staff was not in a position to resolve these issues in a public meeting tonight. Bauer recommended a continuance. Ervin stated that the Church had believed that all issues had been resolved. He added that the Church would not be comfortable with proceeding until these issues were resolved. Ervin said that a 30 day continuance would be acceptable. Sandstad believed that the land use for Church was acceptable. Bill Gilk, 8485 Red Oak Drive, representing Red Rock Shores, questioned the statement by Mr. Nicklay related to a median on County Road 4. Kipp replied that it would be a median cut for Lake Shore Drive. Gilk asked if you would be able to access to Berger Drive. Kipp replied there would be an access point. Bauer noted that the plan for County Road 4 was a County plan and not a City plan. Gilk questioned potential traffic problems. Kipp stated that he would forward a copy of the correspondence from the County to Mr. Gilk. Gilk stated that he supported the project with reservation. He noted that he owned property to the north and requested consideration of a double row of evergreens along the northern property line to screen his property. Gilk added that he would like to see the evergreens planted at the beginning of the development process and not as a finishing touch. Mark Olsen, Meadowvale & Berger Drive, stated that he owned development property to the south of this proposal. Olsen was concerned about the traffic flow and how close the parking 6 ( area would be to the residential area and what type of screening would be provided to the south. Sandstad asked Olsen if were opposed to the project or only concerned with traffic and screenin!t issues. Olsen replied that he was not opposed but had concerns. Steve Wagner, 8430 Eden Prairie Road, stated that he was surprised by comments on expansion of County Road 4. Wagner said that his driveway would be impacted and believed the comments to be premature. The County Road 4 expansion will also impact the trails. Kipp replied that as part of the County Road 4 plan trails were proposed for both sides. Kipp added that the contract had just been awarded. Sandstad requested that the Planning Commission be provided with a concept plan regarding the road and intersections. Hawkins requested additional information also be provided on the trails. Kipp stated that the screening issues would be addressed at the next meeting also. MOTION: Bauer moved, seconded by Hallett to continue this item to the February 10, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 6-0-0. • • • B. , I Planning Commission Minutes March 9, 1992 VICTORY LU1HERAN CHURCH by Victory Lutheran Church. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Public, and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres, Preliminary Plat of 10 acres into 5 lots for construction of a 7,600 square foot church and 4 new single family lots to be known as Victory Lutheran Church. Location: East of Eden Prairie Road, West of Red Oak Drive and north of Bergen Drive. A continued public hearing. Kipp reported that this item had been continued from the January 13, 1992 meeting to address issues raised by area residents and Commission members, including; a cul-de-sac versus a private driveway for existing home owner, access to County Road 4 at Berger Drive, screening of parking area, and storm water N.U.R.P. pond standards. Pastor Mundahl, representing the Church, stated that all of the issues raised by the residents at the January 13, 1992 meeting had been addressed. He added that the Church concurred with the recommendations outlined in the Staff Report. Kipp reported that a cul-de-sac plan was now being proposed which appeared to meet everyone's needs. He also said that the County would be shifting the full median cut from Lake Shore Drive (to be abandoned) to proposed Berger"Drive. Kipp stated that adequate screening of the parking area was proposed and that a N.U.R.P. pond would be developed according to current standards. Kipp reported that Staff recommended approval of the revised plan as proposed. Jane Murphy, 16072 Berger Drive, stated concern about the lighting and screening of the parking lot. Murphy questioned if the lights would be left on all night. Kipp replied that the lighting would be 20-foot downcast lighting which was standard for projects which abutted residential areas. Pastor Mundahl replied that the latest the lights in the parking lot should be left on would be approximately 10:00 PM. Kipp replied that a site line was drawn from the Murphy property to the parking lot demonstrating screening of the parking. Bill Gilk, 8485 Red Oak Drive, questioned if evergreens would be planted to screen the parking lot on the north side. Kipp replied that evergreens would be planted along the back of the building and additional berming would be provided. Kipp added that earth berming would be located along County Road 4. Norman asked the Nicklay's to comment on their satisfaction with the proposal of a cul-de-sac. Alan Nicklay replied that they were comfortable with the plan as proposed and added that their concerns had been addressed satisfactorily. Bauer commented that while he was comfortable with the changes in the plans, it would have been helpful to have had the minutes of the January 13, 1992 meeting included in the packet. 2 ( ( Norman concurred that seeing the minutes from the previous meeting would have been helpful. Kipp replied that items 1 thru 4 in the Staff Report were a condensed version of the issues raiseA at the January 13, 1992 meeting. .-. Clinton asked if the DNR Shoreline Ordinance issue had been resolved. Kipp replied yes, that both the Shoreline Ordinance and N.U.R.P. issues had been ~esolved. Kardell stated that she was pleased with the resolutions presented to address the issues raised at the last meeting. MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Victory Lutheran Church for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres, based on plans dated March 4, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated January 10 and March 6, 1992. Motion carried 6-0- o. MOTION 3: Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to recommend to the City Council approval of the reque. of Victory Lutheran Church for Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Public and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres for construction of a 7,600 sq. ft. church, and Zoning District Amendment within the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres for four (4) new single family lots, based on plans dated March 4, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated January 10 and March 6, 1992. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 4: Bauer moved, seconded by Kardell to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Victory Lutheran Church for Preliminary Plat of ten (10) acres into five (5) lots for construction of a 7,600 sq. ft. church and four (4) new single family lots, based on plans dated March 4, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated January 10 and March 6, 1992. Motion carried 6-0-0. • • • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC~ & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. March 16, 1992 -5;.. Lambert: said-that· sirice the~warming house behiria1the sChOcn·~f.s"" used for~ summer programs,' construction fences needs to be put up for safety reasons. He asked where p~rkih~~will beav~il~ble for users of the ballfields . . ~. -. -..... :. -~. " ::-.'0.":: " -.--',' ::: ~ SIC =- Thompson said the developer will try to maintain a6~. - porE±on~8fSthe=area for-:these-activities"but~construction will'. affect this to a certain degree. -.. :.:'~: reil10.:le.L.ec~ w·.l~r: ~: ... "::' ::~:: .. :..:..:....-.::..:._._ :..:. ... :_ ........ ui... _. __ ~ tainbert~ suggested-"using the hockey rink as a staging area and leaving as much of the parking lot open as possible.: '._":0:._ .,. ..::.:::::: . . --- kichardasked if the: playground will be lost. Lambert said no. ".-, '.-................. "'".- Richard asked if the playground-equipment here is e6rilptlrable~ to'-the-age of~;·the· children at·' the school. timberti~aid no~ bijt the selection of playground equipment for the school is generally made by the principal and PTO and-Prairie View playground equipment on the west side of the building is very old. - MOTION: Kracum moved to recommend approval of the:proposal for the expansion of the schools per staff recommendation. Lynch seconded the motion and it passed 6-0. B. Victory Lutheran Church Refer to staff reports dated January 10, 1992 and March 6, 1992. Cross said that the church will be located on a 6.6 acre site east of County Road 4, north of Berger Drive and west 6f Red Oak Drive. There is a trail along County Road 4 that will be shifted to the other side of the road with the construction of the church. MOTION: Lynch moved to approve the request for Victory Lutheran Church per staff recommendation. Bowman seconded the motion and it passed 6-0 . (' ~~TrnT~©tr &, ( ~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO. METRO WATERS -1200 WARNER 772-7910 ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 FILENO. January 14, 1992 Mr. Steve Erban Be Architects 3748 Oakgreen Ave. No. stillwater, MN 55082 RE: VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Erban: I am writing in response to our telephone conversation regarding my December 23, 1991 comments to the city of Eden Prairie on the victory Lutheran Church proposal. You were concerned about our comment on the lack of a storm water management plan and objection to having storm water routed directly to Red Rock Lake without treatment. As I explained, that was a standard comment for plans that don't include storm water management information. When I make that comment I usually expect one of the following situations to be applicable: 1) the stormwater is being routed into an existing system and no new work will occur in or adjacent to DNR protected waters/wetlands, 2) a new storm water management system is planned that will not be in or adjacent to DNR protected waters/wetlands, or 3) a new storm water management system was being considered that would involve DNR protected waters/wetlands. In situations 1 and 2, the DNR usually does not have any jurisdiction (unless construction dewatering is extensive enough to require a DNR appropriation permit). However, we always encourage efforts to minimize the detrimental impacts of stormwater from both new and old developments on water quality. In situation 3 a DNR protected waters permit would most likely be required, so the DNR would be directly involved. It is my understanding that in the case of the Victory Church proposal we have a situation similar to #1 above the stormwater will be routed to an existing city system. case the DNR does not have direct jurisdiction. Lutheran and that In this After our discussion, I talked with city planner Scott Kipp about the project. Mr. Kipp explained that the city recently adopted a new policy that there be on-site storm water treatment (to "NURP" • • standards) for non-single family residential developments greater • than 5 acres. The Wal-Mart project that the city recently approved AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • Mr. steve Erban January 14, 1992 Page 2 ( was the first project for which this new policy applied. While I am not completely familiar with the details of the city's new policy, we certainly support the city's efforts to minimize the detrimental impacts to water quality from new or existing development. It is unfortunate that the overall stormwater management plan in that area did not address treatment for water quality purposes, since there should have been treatment for the storm water from the whole area, but as with many regulations the previously approved (and constructed) projects are "grandfathered in." I hope this clarifies the intent of the DNR comments in the December 23, 1991 letter. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have further questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist cc: Scott Kipp, City of Eden Prairie ~ Red Rock Lake (27-76P) file ('innesota Department of Transporr-'on Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 December 10, 1991 Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 In Reply Refer To: TH 212 C.S.2762 Victory Luthern Church Co. Rd. 4/New 212 Eden Prairie Dear Mr. Enger: Reply to Telephone No. 593-8753 We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments: This development is near the New TH 212 corridor scheduled for letting in 1995. Attached is a copy of the official R/W map for this area which indicates that the required setbacks should be reconsidered and the berm adjacent to Co.Rd. 4 may be affected. Also, proposed Berger Dr. extension requires moving the proposed median opening on Co.Rd. 4. All of these considerations should be coordinated with Mn/DOTs consultant Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Inc. This local action should be reviewed by the Riley-Purgatory Creek Watershed district. ,~/ ~ 1990 U 1 An Equal Opportunity Employer • • • • • • Mr. Chris Enger December 10, 1991 Page Two ( ( H you have any questions regarding this review please call me at 593-87~3. Sincerely, ck-~\o kO_ Tim Henkel Transportation Planner cc: Mary Anderson, Metropolitan Council Les Weigelt, Hennepin Co. Mike Reiter, Hennepin Co . ( ( HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 PHONE: (612) 930-2500 FAX (612) 930-2513 TDD: (612) 930-2696 November 21, 1991 Chris Enger Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat -Victory Lutheran Church CSAH 4, east side approximately 650 feet north of Candlewood Parkway Section 17, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 1960 Review and Recommendations . Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and have the following comments: -The proposed plat is within the construction limits of County Project No. 9016. At this time Project No. 9016 is scheduled for contract letting in 1993. The developer should contact Bruce Polaczyk, PE, at 930-2523 for project information and project coordination. -The developer should dedicate an additional 17 feet of right of way for a total of 50 feet from and along the CSAH 4 centerline. -The proposed location of Berger Drive as shown on the site plan dated November 7, 1991, approximately 145 feet north of the plat's southwest corner, is acceptable. This access must include auxiliary lanes (turn, acceleration, and by-pass lanes). The developer must acquire an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning access construction. The developer should contact Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548 for permit forms and access design information. -As shown on the proposed plat, existing Lake Shore Drive must be removed. Removal work within County right of way also requires an approved permit. -All access from the plat to CSAH 4 must be via the City street system. Other than Berger Drive, no direct access to CSAH 4 will be permitted. • • -For informational purposes, any development or redevelopment of the residential lot immediately south of the proposed plat and abutting CSAH 4 should include provisions for access to Berger Drive. The existing driveway to CSAH 4 should be removed at that time. • HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer • • • Chris Enger November 21, 1991 Page 2 ( ( -All proposed construction within County right of way requires either an approved utility permit or entrance permit prior to beginning construction. The utility permit includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Office, 930-2549, for utility permit forms. -The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during plat construction. Please direct any response or questions to Doug Mattson at 930-2675. Dennis L. Hansen, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer DLH/DBM:gk , (PI 0 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 6, 1992 Victory Lutheran Church East of County Road 4, north of Berger Drive, West of Red Oak Drive Victory Lutheran Church Harry A. Rogers, Nancy and Allen Nicklay 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres. 2. Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Public and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the RI-22 District on 3.4 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 10 acres into 5 lots and road right-of-way. . - -'" North "', ---t • • • Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church March 6, 1992 BACKGROUND This project was continued at the January 13, 1992 Planning Commission meeting in order for the proponent to address the following concerns: 1. The use of a cul-de-sac versus a private driveway for the existing home located in the southeast comer of the site. 2. Access to County Road 4 at Berger Drive. 3. Landscape buffering of the parking area. 4. Storm water handling through N. U. R. P. ponding standards. ACCESS The site plan has been modified to replace the proposed private driveway for the existing home in the southeast comer of the site with a public cul-de-sac. This revision is based on meetings held between City Staff, the church, and the current property owners. Two additional lots to • the north also share this roadway. • Sewer and water service will be provided within the cul-de-sac to serve the existing home and one lot to the north. Sewer and water stubs currently exist along Red Oak Drive for the proposed lot in the northeast corner. Since the existing home now fronts along this proposed roadway, a variance for lot frontage, as referred in the previous Staff Report, will not be necessary. Provided with this report is a County Road 4 layout which indicates a shift in the full access location from Lake Shore Drive, south to the new location of Berger Drive. Both Hennepin County and MNDOT have endorsed this access shift. STORM WATER RUNOFF Catch basins are being provided within the parking lot and the proposed Lake Shore Drive cul- de-sac, directing runoff to an existing storm sewer stub along the north property line. Prior to any runoff entering this existing outlet, it will now be ponded within a sedimentation basin designed to meet the National Urban Runoff Policy Standards, as required in the previous Staff Report. Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church March 6, 1992 Existing catch basins within Berger Drive are adequate for the additional runoff generated by the extension of this roadway to County Road 4. Continued maintenance of Lake Shore Drive over the years has caused an existing low point along the roadway to be filled over. This low point provided positive drainage for the existing home located in the southeast comer of the site. During storm events, water 'now tends to collect on the property. As part of this proposal, the proponent has agreed to regrade a drainage swale to provide positive drainage necessary. SU1\1MARY The decision to change the Guide Plan from low density residential to church needs to be based 'on factors that make this the appropriate land use for the site and surrounding area, including; The residential character of the design. The transitional and buffering aspects between the County road and the residential areas to the east. The preserved open space. Minimal traffic generation. This project will require the vacation of Lake Shore Drive from County Road 4 easterly to the existing residential lots. A new connection to County Road 4 will take place at Berger Drive, and a cul-de-sac will be provided to access the 3 proposed lots on the east side of the develop men t. The plans submitted address the issues raised in the previous Staff Report and Planning Commission meeting. The street, utility and storm water plans are preliminary in nature, and will require further design revisions in order to meet full City standards. This is typically handled prior to final plat release, and will not affect the overall design of the subdivision. RECOMMEr\TDA TIONS The Planning Staff recommend approval of the Guide Plan change from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres, Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Public and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the R 1-22 Zoning District on 3.4 acres, and • • • • • • Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church March 6, 1992 Preliminary Plat of 10 acres into 5 lots and road right-of-way and based on the Staff Reports dated January 10, 1992 and March 6, 1992, plans revised and dated March 4, 1992, and subject to the following: 1. Prior to final plat, the proponent shall: A. Vacate Lake Shore Drive, except for that portion lying east of the lot located in the southeast comer. B. Submit detailed storm water and erosion control plans for review and approval by the Watershed District. C. Submit detailed storm water, street, utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer, including design of the proposed storm water retention pond to National Urban Runoff Policy standards. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hour in advance of grading. 3. Concurrent with street and utility construction, the proponent shall: A. Receive an access permit from the County for Berger Drive. This shall include a bypass lane along County Road 4 at the intersection with Berger Drive. B. Extend the existing trail located on the east side of County Road 4 south to the south property line of the church property, prior to it crossing over to the west side of County Road 4. This shift is to accommodate the bypass lane for the County road. C. Extend City sewer and water to serve all proposed single family lots. D. Construct a drainage swale across the vacated portion of Lake Shore Drive to provide positive drainage for the existing lot in the southeast comer of the property. E. Restore vacated Lake Shore Drive with seed and mulch. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Submit building material samples and colors for review and approval. Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church March 6, 1992 B. Submit signage and site lighting details for review and approval. C. Pay Cash Park Fee. 5. Proponent acknowledges that site access will be from Berger Drive only, and that no direct access to County Road 4 will be permitted for either the church site or the single family lot. 6. Proponent acknowledges that all public street construction will commence before building permit issuance, or concurrent with building construction with no occupancy permit to be granted until such road improvements are complete. 7. Proponent acknowledges that any building expansion beyond phase one as shown will require a return to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval. VCLUTH2.SAK:bs • • • • ~. /' + I q,"" , <., , .-~ -I\f,;'b LI -1\, W' r-4.<::i 0 '" R .'b" -'" • I : =t) :::cu iJ e-rl -1 I .~_J . ...... J ~ ~ 0 ~~r2 uJ tll :::J ~ 0 ~ -::::(" 411t .. 0 ~ 0 <!. ~ u.. ::lj 0 u, a ~ --! W \() =U CL:. .!, ':t: ,'.) 0 I--"'J,.. -r 3 y )( ~ "'c9 (,nCo =[] ~ ~ cs: STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: WCATION: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: REQUEST: ( Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning January 10, 1992 Victory Lutheran Church East of County Road 4, north of Berger Drive, west of Red Oak Drive Victory Lutheran Church Harry A. Rogers, Nancy and Allen Nicklay 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres. 2. Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Public and Site Plan Review on 6.6 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the Rl-22 District on 3.4 acres with a variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals. 4. Preliminary Plat of 10 acres into 5 lots and road right-of-way. • • • • ( Staff Report Victory lAItheran Church January 10, 1992 BACKGROUND This site was zoned RI-22 per Ordinance 135 in 1969. Surrounding land uses consist of Rl-22 single family to the north, east and south, and Rural located west of County Road 4. The site slopes toward the north from a high point of 884 on the west side and 880 on the east side to a low point of 856 along the north central portion of the property. Lakeshore Drive currently traverses the property. Existing vegetation consists of mainly boxelder and elm along the north property line and abutting both sides of Lakeshore Drive. Two oaks exist in the extreme easterly portion of the site and will not be affected by this proposal. GUIDE PLAN CHANGE A change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan has been requested on 6.6 acres from Low Density Residential to Church. The Guide Plan does not identify future sites for churches, but rather reflects existing church sites or ones approved by previous actions, therefore, the decision to change the Guide Plan to Church must be based on the need within the area and specific impacts to the site and surrounding land uses. A church use on this property may be appropriate based on the following reasons: 1. This use disturbs less of the property, with half of the site remaining in its natural state. 2. The church and parking lot are both located close to County Road 4 maintaining maximum distance to the existing single family homes. 3. The upgrading of County Road 4 and future construction of Highway 212 will increase traffic along the County road making the church use a better transition and buffer to single family developments. 4. Traffic generation from the church will peak only on Sunday mornings with the majority of trips accessing from County Road 4, thus minimizing traffic flow through the residential area. 5. Church activity will be minimal for the majority of the time. 6. The residential character of the church design is compatible with neighboring residential uses . ------. ...... -... "'··,....-,~~·~.· ... _____ ~ ______ ... _~_ ... __ .. "_""'"'~m~ ..... ~.,.... ... ,''''I''').'').''),~"",mo~._,. .. ____ .,.,..._ ... ,.. __ ~_~ __ . _______ _ ( Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church January 10, 1992 PRELIMINARY PLAT ( The request is for a preliminary plat of 10 acres into 5 lots, four of which are for single family housing. The church is located on 6.6 acres with the residential lots totalling 3.4 acres. All residential lots meet the minimum size requirements within the Rl-22 Zoning District. The existing house is to remain taking access from Red Oak Drive. Lakeshore Drive will be vacated as part of this proposal, except for the most easterly portion that connects to proposed Lot 4. A variance from the Board of Appeals will be necessary for road frontage along Lot 4 from the 90 feet required in the Rl-22 Zoning District down to 50 feet. Berger Drive will be extended to County-Road 4 to replace the access lost by the vacation of Lakeshore Drive. Additional County road right-of-way is provided as part of this plat. In addition, the plat identifies the future right-of-way limits required by the State for the Highway 212 project. SITE PLAN The site plan depicts the construction of a 7,600 square foot church with a future expansion • potential toward the east. A total of 70 parking spaces are provided meeting Code based on a • first phase of 200 seats at one space for every three seats. All setbacks meet Code requirements. Access to the church will be from Berger Drive only. No direct access to County Road 4 will take place. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Minimal site alteration will be required with this proposal consisting of building pad construction, parking lot, and Berger Drive extension. Berming is provided along County Road 4 to screen the parking lot. Due to the sloping condition of the property, berming is not possible along the south and east sides of the parking to screen views from the residential areas. This will require screening with the use of plant materials, and will be discussed in the landscaping section. A series of catch basins have been provided for storm water handling which directs storm water directly to Red Rock Lake through a connection to an existing stub along the north property line. The DNR has reviewed the drainage plan and indicates the need to address an appropriate storm water treatment feature, such as a sedimentation basin prior to the run-off entering Red Rock • • • • ( Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church January 10, 1992 ( Lake (See attached letter). In addition, this pond will need to meet National Urban Run-off Policy standards. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall address storm water handling to the satisfaction of the City and DNR. Existing catch basins within Berger Drive are adequate for additional run-off generated by the extension of this roadway to County Road 4. UTILITIES City sewer and water service is available to the property with connection to existing lines within Berger Drive and along Red Oak Drive. The water line within Berger Drive will be looped to . County Road 4. Sewer and water will be extended to the existing house from Red Oak Drive. An existing fire hydrant will now be located within the northeast comer of Lot 4 as a result of the proposed vacation of Lakeshore Drive. An additional ten foot easement will be required along the extreme easterly portion of vacated Lakeshore Drive in order to provide access to the hydrant for maintenance purposes. ACCESS Berger Drive is proposed to access County Road 4 as part of this development. This road is designed at approximately an 8% grade which is the maximum allowed by Code. Site vision distance along the County Road will be improved with this new access. The County is also requiring by-pass and turning lanes along the County Road at this intersection. In order for these lanes to work, the existing 8 foot bituminous trail will need to be extended farther south before crossing the County road. Access to Lot 4 will be from Red Oak Drive by way of a short portion of Lakeshore Drive right-of-way which will remain. However, the curb, gutter and bituminous will be removed within this area and replaced with a driveway to serve the existing house. New curbing and a connecting section of sidewalk will be placed along Red Oak Drive. Since this will still be City right-of-way, access to the existing and proposed utilities will be maintained. ARCHITECTURE The pitched roof design of the church is done in such a manner to blend well with the surrounding residential area. Building materials consist of 75 % glass and stone veneer and small percentage of wood, meeting Code requirements in the Public Zoning District. The structure .,.::.'- ( Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church January 10, 1992 ( does not exceed the 30 foot height limitation by Code. Portions of the building will be earth bermed. Both the mechanical equipment screening wall and trash enclosure will be constructed of materials consistent with the main structure. LANDSCAPING The landscaping proposal provides adequate screening of the parking lot from County Road 4 with use of benning and evergreen plant material. However, no screening has been provided for views from the residential housing areas to the east. Because of the sloping nature of the site, screening of the parking area from the east will rely solely on the use of plant materials. The attachment shows how additional evergreen material can be incorporated into the design to provide the necessary screening from the residential areas. Prior to City Council review, proponent shall address the need for screening of the parking lot from these residential areas. LIGHTING The lighting proposed for the site consists of 20 foot downcast cut-off luminars to eliminate off- site glare. Some building security lighting is proposed as well and will require similar downcast design in order to eliminate glare. SUMMARY The decision to change the Guide Plan from low density residential to church needs to be based on factors that make this the appropriate land use for the site and surrounding area, including: The residential character of the design. The transitional and buffering aspects between the County road and residential areas to the east. The preserved open space. Minimal traffic generation. This project will require the vacation of Lakeshore Drive. A new connection to County Road 4 will take place at Berger Drive. This will maintain an additional and safer access for residential traffic to reach the County road. • • • • • • (', ( Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church January 10, 1992 RECOMMENDATIONS If the Planning Commission feels that a Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Church has merit and has been properly mitigated for such a use, then the Planning Staff would recommend approval of the Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Church on 6.6 acres, Zoning District Change from R1-22 to Public and site plan review on 6.6 acres, Zoning district amendment within the R1-22 Zoning District on 3.4 acres, with a variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals and preliminary plat of 10 acres into 5 lots and road right-of- way based on this report, plans revised and dated December 20, 1991 and December 23, 1991 and subject to the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Address the storm water handling issue raised in the DNR correspondence dated December 23, 1991 attached to this report to their satisfaction, including meeting the National Urban Run-off Policy standards. B. Provide an additional 10 foot drainage and utility easement within the northeast comer of Lot 4 for maintenance purposes of the City fire hydrant. C. Revise the landscaping plan to establish adequate screening of the parking lot from the residential properties to the east and south based on the attachment to this report. 2. Prior to final plat, proponent shall: A. B. C. D. Vacate Lakeshore Drive, except that portion which exists between Red Oak Drive and the easterly property line of Lot 4. Receive a variance from the Board of Appeals for road frontage for Lot 4 from 90 feet down to 50 feet. Submit detailed storm water and erosion control plans for review and approval by the Watershed District. Submit detailed storm water, street, utility and erosion control plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. ( ( Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church January 10, 1992 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 4. Concurrent with street and utility construction, proponent shall: 5. A. Receive an access permit from the County for Berger Drive, also construct bypass and tum lanes along County Road 4 at the intersection with Berger Drive, including relocation of the 8 foot bituminous trail as shown. B. Extend City sewer and water to Lots 3 and 4. C. Remove the curb, gutter and bituminous within the remammg portion of Lakeshore Drive right-of-way and replace with a private driveway to the existing house on Lot 4. The portion of driveway within City right-of-way must be built adeequate to support the weight of City vehicles. In addition, install new curbing and a connecting section of sidewalk along Red Oak Drive. E. Restore vacated Lakeshore Drive with seed and mulch. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Submit building material samples and color scheme for review and approval. B. Submit signage and site lighting details for review and approval. C. Pay Cash Park Fee. 6. Proponent acknowledges that site access will be from Berger Drive only, and that no direct access to County Road 4 will be permitted for either the church site or single family lot. 7. Proponent acknowledges that any building expansion beyond phase one as shown will require a return to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval. If the Planning Commission feels that the Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Church does not have merit and found to be an inappropriate use for the site, then a recommendation of denial would be warranted. VCLUTH.SAK:bs 1 • • • (( [NJ[N!J~~©iY~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • PHONENO. ~ STATE OF METRO WATERS -1200 772-7910 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 FILENO, • • December 23, 1991 Mr. Chris Enger city of Eden Prairie Planning Department 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH, RED'ROCK LAKE (27-76P), CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Enger: We have reviewed the site plans (received November 13, 1991) for the above-referenced project (SE1/4 section 17, Tl16N, R22W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. The project site does not contain any DNR protected waters or wetlands; therefore, no DNR protected waters permit is required. 2. The site does not appear to be within a floodplain district. 3. The proposed plan does not 'indicate how the stormwater will be managed. You are advised that the DNR would object to having the stormwater routed directly to Red Rock Lake. stormwater sedimentation/treatment basins, or other appropriate stormwater treatment features, should be included in the stormwater management plan. If stormwater is routed directly to Red Rock Lake it can cause sedimentation and water level bounces that are detrimental to the basin's wildlife values and water quality. 4. It appears that the site may be within the 1000' foot shoreland district of Red: Rock Lake, which has a shoreland classification of Recreational Development. If so, the development should be consistent with the city's shoreland management regulations. The city is in the process of updating its shoreland management ordinance to be consistent with the 1989 version of state guidelines. However, I see some areas in the current Victory Lutheran Church proposal that could potentially be in conflict with the current state shore land guidelines: AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER foZ~ Mr. Enger December 23, 1991 Page Two a. The amount of impervious surface within the shore land district of Red Rock Lake should be less than 25 percent of the total area of the development within the shore land district. b. The structures in the development should be shielded from view on the shores of Red Rock Lake using vegetation, topography, color and other means acceptable to the city. 5. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. 6. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me, or Staff Hydrologist Joe Richter, at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist cc: Red Rock Lake (27-76P) File Joe Yanta, USCOE Bob Obermeyer, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WSD Wayne Barstad, DNR Ecologica-l Services • • • ," \ \ \ \ \ ~ ~\ (,), ~,I ~ ~:\ -../1 ,?I ~ .-'~ ~ ?,\ • I. , ~ ,o~INGt(~" ,,,~-:;,"l'(P. .... _ ... _ ........ -...... -............. . • .. ...... ~ ........... , ... _ ... a •• ' ........ ~ .... . i,( • PROPOSED RESIDENTlioL ',(~ f \ \\ DENOTES APPROXIMAn:\~ GRA[)ING-UMrrS~ , ApPPOi(IMf, n: t.nt',\· :.' ", : , ~: A~ \f~ Fvp.>1'£ I /3l<P"",SIo ... ,~AN'p'-,PAiD ~J-t1\l.I..eE~' a '-} 0' £vef:.4t?:f:£N S. '~,-" PROPO~;::l\ RES1DENiIA'" l.'JT C FlJfv~e 5~ fZ~N I "-l4 APPROX1MA~~ ARE.,\ ' 'J I..!C<; SO, F \ LAI<,E5dORE DRIVE R1GHT:bF-WAY (VACATED, Ult a stVRfID N?S-~~_1<:.1D~) r- t I I I i ~, "', t (VAC PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOT D f APPAOXIMA1t AREA -sP4QO I ' I- , v: I~ fe" It' IN EXISTING \1ESI[JENCE .. __ ~-~---"~\._Jj .-.-------.:--.-.----.-. I H) I") PARKING LOT SCREENING ~. ~ ---.) ::(,' :~~; ~ TI?-, 8~.O· .' "" '-, INV-B~/.$~ ., I "------bJ..FIS"rt 4.2 r"j.; ,J " 'b~1 \ C(3 .A·I . I \ m· 8$$.0 .! , '\ INV-8S/. iJ " 'll~ '. '·(3f<ADE.. TO O,J,t-J TOC8~ 'I 'IbO LF IZ' . AI ~ ~2 ! ., " C 8. 8 ~D i ; i I " 1 !c ,------EROSION CONi OL N , . \, ___ C B~ B ,,/ ,I) 1"~-.. B70.0 /1 INV' 866.0 '_, 1\ :\ r-' 'I' " \ ~.~~~ S:,/\/ITARY Iv1H 3 -' T~-8b~O \ I."N-8S7.0 _ ~(;O LF 8" PVC(! 6.0% ;..-Cbt;J"'ECT 10 EX/.H /2 "-'-, 4 "", ~ ""'-. ... 'r" .~ ~ PlH. /J o. 'I. I 1, 2 :;. .... ... ~> .. """ __ / E~OS'~O/\/ CONTROL \ ". ,: _._ ..... ,qe..;q-~ ...• ~' L._ -'-_... .2 Z.b3 ................•... .1 L.... .193.37.... , I LAKE~ORE DRIVE VACATION .7b·.~/2""" " .• 11')' ~/~' ,It,.' (e <'~. / • • • • Central Middle School CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-66 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 FOR CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL WHEREAS, Independent School District 272 has applied for site plan approval for Central Middle· School for construction of an approximately 60,000 square foot addition and parking circulation improvement on 60 acres on property located at 8025 School Road currently zoned Public, 1-2 and RI-22 Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its March 9, 1992, Planning Commission meeting and recommends approval of said site plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1992, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Independent School District for Central Middle School for construction of an approximately 60,000 square foot addition and parking circulation improvement based on plans dated February 11, 1992, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit issuance, the School District shall submit for review and approval: 2. a. A landscaping plan for a minimum of 597 caliper inches. This may be modified based upon the Hoisington Study of existing trees on the property. b. A rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan to Code. c. Revised grading and drainage plan depicting N.U.R.P. pond. d. An exterior materials board showing materials and colors for the proposed building additions. In addition, the School District will be required to return to the Planning Commission for review of the exterior materials. e. Apply for and receive approval of an impervious surface variance from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Prior to grading permit issuance, the School District shall submit for review and approval: a. Detailed storm water runoff, water quality, utility, and erosion control plans to the City Engineer. b. Detailed storm water runoff and erosion controls to the Watershed District. c. Provide erosion control around the construction limits of the property and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 7th day of April, 1992. ATTEST: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk e e· e • • \-) Planning Commission Minutes March 9, 1992 D. CE~TTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL by Independent School District 272 for Site Plan Review within the Public, 1-2 and Rl-22 Zoning Districts on approximately 60 acres for construction of a 60,000 square foot addition and parking circulation improvements to the Central Middle School. Location: 8025 School Road. Thompson presented plans for a 60,000 square foot addition to include classrooms, a cafeteria, and gym. The project would be accomplished in phases which would begin in 1993 and complete in 1996. Thompson stated that the existing entry on School Road was unacceptable and a new curb cut would be made to move the traffic around the Kindergarten Center and Administrative Building. The grade would be reduced to approximately 7%. Thompson said that a one-way loop system would be developed in 1994-1995. Thompson reported that the proponent was working with MnDot regarding Highway 212 location and drainage issues. The proposal would include the development of ball fields etc. to the north. Thompson stated that as many utilities as possible would be buried underground. The demolition of a portion of Wallace Road would be part of Phase II. Three warehouse structures to the east would also be demolished. The students would then be brought in to the east end of the school. Sandstad asked if the buses would use both School Road and Highway 5. Thompson replied that the buses only would use School Road to the Kindergarten Center . 8 I Norman asked if a new access to Technology Drive would be done when Wallace Road was closed. She did not believe that it would be good to have all the buses go down to HighW •. Thompson replied that all the buses would not use Highway 5. Kardell asked the proponent to go over the Phasing Plans. Thompson replied that the west side would be developed first with the realignment of School Road and the west parking area. In 1994-1995 the addition to the north and east would be done with the abandonment of Wallace Road. Norman asked if any of the Administration would go into the new proposed facility with the City offices. Enger replied that the Family Center and Community Education would be located with the City offices. Norman asked if the Kindergarten Center was adequate. Hamilton replied that some remodeling· of the Kindergarten Center would be done. Bauer asked what exterior material was proposed. Thompson replied it was the proponent's intent to match the existing brick, glass and aluminum. Thompson added that some discussion had been given to the use of exterior panels similar to those used at Oak Point. Bauer asked Thompson exactly what the Planning Commission was approving tonight. Thompson replied brick, glass, and aluminum similar to the existing. Bauer asked if these were the final sketches. Thompson replied no. Bauer was concerned about approving plans without seeing exactly was being proposed. Enger replied that it would be appropriate if the Commission desired to approve the site plan and ask the proponent to return with final colors etc .. Norman asked if the addition of a second story had been considered. Thompson rePlied,. from a cost perspective it was not a good solution. Enger reviewed the Staff Report recommendations. Kardell asked if the Base Area Ratio was after the additions. Enger replied yes. Norman asked when the proponent would return to present the exterior materials. Enger replied that it could be any time prior to building. Enger added that if the proponent's philosophy on the color of the brick were to change the City should be notified immediately. " :- Scott Mork, 8081 Wallace Road, asked for clarification on the abandonment of Wallace Road. Thompson replied that a cul-de-sac would be developed and Wallace Road would be abandoned in front of the school. MOTION 1: Norman moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Norman moved, seconded by Clinton to recommend to the City Council approval of the reql of School District ~~72 for .Site PI~ Review .on ap~rox~mately 60 acres for constructi<?n 0 60.000 sq. ft. additIOn, WIth parking and CIrculatIon Improvements, to the Central Midd e School, based on plans dated March 2, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1992 with the addition that Item 1.0 be Changed to 3.B, landscaping requirements are per the Hosington Study, and the proponent needed to return to the Planning Commission with exterior material samples .. Motion carried 6-0-0. fo'1 Dk • • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. March 16, 1992 -2- Bridges disussed the learning exchange program which includes programs such as "Know Your City Hall" and "Dress for Success". A cooking class will also be offered at Welcome Home in Eden Prairie. Kissel is the parent of two daughters who have taken advantage of almost all the programs that are offered by the City. The youngest daughter has participated in programs for special needs children and has a special interest in the integrated programs. Vanderploeg asked how many people participate in the program now compared to previous years. Vikesland said that the numbers in the programs has doubled. Kracum asked how the group finds out how many special -needs children there are. Vikesland said they work closely with the school district and also try to make new residents aware of the program. Vikesland added that there are four sub-committees with the program including marketing, special programs and education. Richard asked how Eden Prairie compares to other communities on programs for special needs children. Kissel said she feels the academics if the first things parents look for with recreation second and Eden Prairie is vastly improving in recreation for special populations. Vikesland said that she has had calls from out of state regarding how to get started on a program such as ARLE. V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. School District Proposals for Expansion of Schools Refer to staff reports dated March 6, 1992 and memos from Barb Cross, Landscape Architect dated March 12, 1992. Cross introduced Steve Thompson from Cunningham Architects representing School District 272. Thompson said they are currently working on six projects over a five year time frame. Central Middle School is the largest project amounting to one-third of the referendum dollars. There are no parks and recreation issues involved with this project. UNAPPROVED MINUTES •• March 16, 1992 EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. -3- The first'''phase will" includ'e the addition of clas'srooms, on the north side of the building with a gym and admTn'isti-at'lvecff'ea~l:tb-c the WE{S:t.' -'" J. ~ .. .:.. The second phase includes a media center which will ~ffect ~he current extension of Wallace Road and _~e~ structuring a corridor down the center for better?~ ci ri::'ul at-ion . . 'The' interior of the schoor will be I:emodeled :a:no=a'::rlew-dining' ,room will be added. There"are also safety 'issues involved regarding the drop-off zone.' ~he parking lot to the west will be redone and a new access will be provided to School Road. Bus loading at the kindergarten center will be-revamped and a bus loop will be added on the east 'side similar to Cedar Ridge. 'Lynch-'nOted-that tree loss is estimated at 49% as stated in the staff report. Thompson said he does not believe that thisi~ an ~ccurate number, as this refers to the amount of trees that need to be replaced of the • total that are removed. Lambert asked if the brick on the new additions will match the existing brick. Thompson said there are some reservations about matching the brick for various reasons, but indicated they will try to match the brick. Lambert is concerned about recreation facilities and asked when they will be lost and when they will be replaced. Thompson said the Hoisington Group will be working on the ballfields which will be related to the realignment of Hwy. 212. ~Lambert asked if the school will be without outdQor facilities for 1-2 years. Thompson said it is hoped that the loss of time will be minimal. He is hopeful that they will be able to acquire the buildings along Wallace Road soon so construction can begin. Vanderploeg asked where the main entrance to the school will be. Thompson showed the location of the main entrance on the site plan and added that it will be a plaza area. The Commission also discussed how the construction • would affect the alignment of Scenic Heights Road. • • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. March 16, 1992 ... 4- ThompsQIl_said there _was _ alS,Q 4_.safety .issue involved at FOLesrt~Hil;:~~-::-wi-ththe bus-area-and drop~off __ zone. The berming and landscaping along Holly Road will be retained and the existing road will be for buses only during the day. There will be separate accesses for visitor parking. A landscaped play area will be added ~Q..:. t.Q~ ~):Q\ier ~l~v~l· ; about seven classrooms will. be adcled .on the south side and the inside wil.l.also be'-c::,-_:.-: I;emodel~d w.i.t1) :-the_addition ::Qf 3.4.:.gyro. and art, music and special educat-ion rooms. - Cross said there is a-drainage problem in the low area on the east side of the building. Tiled drains were installed last year and seem to be effective; Because of the summer recreation programs held at Forest Hills which approximately 465 kids participate in, C!..ccess r!>'{:i.ll Q~:nee.cieq from the_warming ,house to _the _.::.,. ~ s.ch~ol: fo.r,restr.ooms and :orinking fountains. -., ;':'-: -~::: " . ... ----,--,-- Harderwijk-Kube asked if the existing play structure will __ be .. ;I;'_emQ'{~d.~c-_.Thompson said yes. Lambert said that staff would be interested in reviewing the new playstructure before construction begins. Kube-Harderwijk asked if the construction will impact the work that is beging done in the wetland area. Lamber~ said no~ Thompson said the project at Prairie View will be similar 1:;0 Forest Hills with very little work on the outside. The access point for overload parking will be added to the hard surface play area and a turnaround area will .pe Rrovided o_n the west side of the building .. -. There is also some concern about drainage from a low spot. Lynch asked about the location of the trail connection. Thompson showed its location on the site plan. Cross added that the City accesses the park property with maintenance vehicles via the trail system. Cross noted that summer youth programs are also held at Prairie View and it will be necessary to have access to the building. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC~ & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. March 16, 1992 ;...s=- L~mb~rt' s~id-that siri~e th~:w~rming house behih~l~h~ scho61'?fs~used' for 'summer programs, -construc:tiCmfences needs £6 be put up-for safety reasons. He asked wH~re ~~rkih9~will be'av~il~ble for users of the ballfields. , .. --' '. ' ' " ::: ~ .. ::: ~ -. ,", ',' ::: ::: s r c :::- • Thompson said the developer will try to maintain ~dc ~brEi6n~8f~Ehe=area for~these-activities, but'con~truction will affect this to a ceitain degree.' ~E remO..J..e . ..l-e8 y..,7]L.i: ':"':~'::' :::_~:""".~:.:..:....._ ---.".-:_ C4;.~ Lambert: suggested"'using the area and leaving as much of I??ssibl~ ~ , , .. =' .ce." , . hockey rink as a staging the parking lot open as Richard asked-if the playground will be lost. Lambert said no. c , Richarda~ked if the playground,equipment here is eofuparable~ to" the~ age of~:the-children at'the school. t~mbert~~~id rio~'b~t the selection of playground equipment for the school is generally made by the principal and PTO and Prairie View playground equipment on the w~st • side of the building is very old. ' MOTION: Kracum moved to recommend approval of the': proposal for the expansion of the schools per staff recommendation. Lynch seconded the motion and it passed 6-0. B. Victory Lutheran Church Refer to staff reports dated January 10, 1992 and March 6, 1992. Cross said that the church will be located on a 6.6 acre site east of County Road 4, north of Berger Drive and west 6£ Red Oak Drive. Theie is a trail along County Road 4 that will be shifted to the other side of the road with the construction of the church. MOTION: Lynch moved to approve the request for Victory Lutheran Church per staff recommendation. Bowman seconded the motion and it passed 6-0. • • • • STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 6, 1992 Central Middle School 8025 School Road Independent School District 272 ( 1. Site Plan Review within the existing Public, Rl-22, and Industrial Zoning District on approximately 60 acres for the construction of 60,000 square feet of building addition and parking and access improvements. c;::::::::- 6'l RE LOCA TION MAP 1 Staff Report Central Middle School March 6, 1992 BACKGROUND ( I ! This site is guided low density residential, secondary elementary school, and industrial. The site is zoned Rl-22, Public, and Industrial. The school is a permitted use within these districts. The City Code requires that the School District receive a site plan approval from the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. The site plan review involves approximately 60,000 square feet of additional building and changes to the access, parking areas, and bus entry. SITE PLAN The existing middle school is 157,000 square feet. A building addition of 60,000 square feet . is planned. The Base Area Ratio of the building to the total site is .08, which is low considering that commercial office buildings can typically develop up to a .30 Base Area Ratio . . The building addition as proposed meets the minimum setback requirements for the Public, Rl- 22 and Industrial Zoning Districts. ACCESS • The Site Plan Review Ordinance requires that provision be made for safe and convenient vehicle • and pedestrian traffic, including interior drives and parking arrangements which facilitate clear access to public streets, appropriate widths for drives and access points, and separation of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. The site plan as proposed is consistent with the provision of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. Three existing industrial buildings will be demolished off of Wallace Road to allow for a separate entrance for bus traffic. Auto traffic and public parking will be relocated north of the existing middle school. School Road will be realigned toward the school pond in order to redesign the road to a 7% road grade versus the existing 10%-14% grade. The above described access improvements will occur as part of phase three to be timed concurrent with Highway 212 expansion and to allow for adequate site access during construction phases. SHORELAND ORDINANCE This site is adjacent to School Pond which is classified as a natural environmental water. The project as proposed is consistent with the regulations of the Shoreland Ordinance with the exception of impervious surface. The Shoreland Ordinance requires that impervious surface does not exceed 30% of the land area within 1,000 feet of the High Water Mark of School Pond. Sheet 5 as prepared by Clark Engineering indicates the existing and proposed drainage areas on site. The existing impervious surface area is 28 %. With building addition and site work, the 2 ('93 • • • • Staff Report Central Middle School March 6, 1992 impervious surface would increase to 35 %. Any impervious surface ratio above 30% will require a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The reasons for considering an impervious surface variance are: 1. Only 25% of the land area within 1,000 feet of the High Water Mark drains toward School Pond. This is area 3 on the proposed drainage area map. 2. The amount of impervious surface that drains toward School Pond decreases from 39 % in the existing condition to 37% in the after condition. 3. When the school was initially built, the septic tanks and drain fields were used. The school is currently connected to sewer and water. 4. Water which currently discharges directly into the School Pond area will be re-routed through a new storm sewer system. As part of this storm sewer system, water must be routed through a N.U.R.P. pond prior to discharge into the wetland area. GRADING AND TREE LOSS The tree inventory indicates a total of 714 inches of significant trees mostly oaks and conifers. A survey of the property by City Staff indicates that there are approximately 300 inches of significant oak and conifer trees which were not included as part of the inventory since they were not within the construction limits. Of the 1014 inches of significant trees on site, 600 inches are virgin oak trees, and 419 inches are conifers which were planted by the School District or by private developers for the existing industrial buildings which will be removed in later phases. Staff recommends tree replacement for the School District as follows: 1. 2. Since there are 600 inches of significant trees on site (mostly oak), tree loss would be 49% and tree replacement would be 192 inches. Tree replacement for the conifers lost due to construction shall be on a tree by tree basis (Trees that are small enough may be machined moved on the property.) This is an administrative departure from City Code which gives credit to the School District for trees they originally planted. 3 Staff Report Central Middle School March 6, 1992 LANDSCAPING ( The amount of landscaping required for this project shall be based upon a ratio of 1 inch of tree for every 320 square feet of building addition. Since there is 60,000 square feet of building addition proposed, the amount of caliper inches required is 188 inches. Landscaping plans shall also include 192 inches of tree replacement for the oak trees and 37 six inch conifers, (representing a tree for tree replacement for the conifers on site). Prior to review by the City Council, the School District shall submit for review an approval, a landscaping and tree replacement plan totalling 597 caliper inches. EXTERIOR MATERIALS The building addition is proposed to be constructed out of facebrick and glass. The facebrick should be of a color to match the existing facebrick on the buildings. Any new mechanical equipment proposed to be located on the roof or on the ground will be required to be screened according to City Code. STORM DRAINAGE Most of the storm water run-off will drain in a northwesterly direction through a storm sewer system to be constructed by the Minnesota Highway Department. As part of the Highway 212 reconstruction, MNDOT will be constructing a series of drainage ponds. The storm sewer from the parking lot and from the north side of the building will drain into these ponds within 212 right-of-way. The southern portion of the site will drain toward proposed School Pond. The drainage plan as proposed discharges the storm water directly into the wetland. Because of new Federal and State standards, a N.U.R.P. (National Urban Runoff Protection) pond must be constructed. Storm water must pass through this pond in order to provide cleaner water quality prior to discharge into the wetland area. The storm drainage plan shall be revised to provide for aN. U.R.P. pond prior to review by the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request of the Independent School District 272 for site plan review on approximately 60 acres within the Industrial, RI-22, and Public 4 • • • • • • Staff Report Central Middle School March 6, 1992 ( Zoning District based on plans dated March 6, 1992 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1992 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. A landscaping plan for 597 caliper inches. B. A rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan. C. A revised grading and drainage plan depicting a N.U.R.P. pond. D. An exterior materials board showing materials and colors for the proposed building additions. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans to the City Engineer. B. Detailed storm water run-off and erosion control plans to the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Occupancy and fire access plans for review by the Building Inspector and Fire Marshal. 4. The proponent shall apply for and receive approval of an impervious surface variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. 5. Prior to grading the proponent shall: A. Provide erosion control around the construction limits of the property and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. . CMSHOOL.MDF:bs 5 r ( ~~T~T~©IY& ~~EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR METRO WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 PHONE NO. 772-7910 FILENO. March 27, 1992 Dan Johnson 2815 wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55405-2184 RE: CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL, SCHOOL POND (27-75W), CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter is in response to a request that I send you a memo concerning the above referenced project in Eden Prairie. • The stormwater from a portion of the project site will be routed to Public Waters Wetland 27-75W (School Pond). We recommend that stormwater routed to Public Waters Wetlands be treated using stormwater sedimentation/treatment basins, or other appropriate stormwater treatment features. If stormwater is routed directly to • the School Pond (27-75W), it can cause sedimentation and water level bounces that are detrimental to the basin's wildlife values and water quality. We often recommend that sump manholes be constructed in areas where there is not enough space to construct a sedimentation pond. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, Joe Richter staff Hydrologist cc: Eden Prairie Shoreland File School Pond (27-75W) File Bob Obermeyer, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WSD Don Uram, C.D.E.P. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • • ( ( MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Allen M. Nelson, Fire Marshal DATE: March 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Central Middle School Fire Code Requirements In reviewing the plans for Central Middle School, a potential problem was found. The first phases of construction continue to provide adequate fire department access to the building. The final proposed phases, however, cause problems with the access because of how the roads are reconfigured . We would recommend that consideration be given to ensuring that this is dealt with before the final site plans are developed. CMSFIRCD.AMN:bs • • • Prairie View Elementary School CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-67 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROV AL FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 FOR PRAIRIE VIEW ELEMENTARY WHEREAS, Independent School District 272 has applied for site plan approval for Prairie View Elementary School for construction of a 15,800 square foot addition on 9.9 acres on property located at 17255 Peterborg Road currently zoned Public, 1-2 and RI-22 Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. reviewed said application at a public hearing at its March 9, 1992, Planning Commission meeting and recommends approval of said site plan; -and, ·WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1992, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Independent School District for Prairie View Elementary School for construction of a 15,800 square foot addition on 9.9 acres based on plans dated February 11, 1992, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to building permit issuance, the School District shall submit for review and approval: a. A rooftop mechanical equipment screening plan to Code. b. Revised grading and drainage plan resolving the existing drainage problem along the west property line. c. An exterior materials board showing materials and colors for the proposed building additions. d. A plan showing a trail connection from the front of the Art/Music building to the existing trail along the west property line. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the School District shall submit for review and approval: a. Storm water runoff and erosion control plans to the City Engineer. b. Storm water runoff and erosion controls to the Watershed District. c. Provide erosion control around the construction limits of the property and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. 3. Continue to work with the City to resolve any parking shortages which occur during special school events and the maintenance of Peterborg Road. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 7th day of April, 1992. ATTEST: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk 160 e e· e • • • Planning Commission Minutes March 9, 1992 E. PRAIRIE VIEW ELEl\1ENTARY SCHOOL by Independent School District 272 for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 9.9 acres for construction of a 15,800 square foot addition to the Prairie View Elementary School. Location: 17255 Peterborg Road. Thompson presented plans for the addition of a gym and classrooms. He noted that no change was proposed for the traffic circulation. Thompson stated that Phase 1 would begin in 1992. The project would proceed with the addition on the north of the building first and then proceed to the south and west end. A new public entrance thru the gym would be provided and there would be upgrading of the existing facility. Sandstad asked if there was a berm in the west portion of the property. Thompson replied that the berm would be located on City property. Thompson reported that the exterior material would match that of the existing facility . Enger asked the proponent to point out where the 2 tennis courts were located. Thompson pointed out the location and added that these courts were to be removed and relocated on the Central Middle School side of the property. Enger asked which court would be removed and which would remain. Hamilton replied that all of the courts were in rough condition. Enger questioned if it would be possible to retain at least I of the tennis courts and to investigate the possibility of tennis courts on the High School property. Thompson believed that both courts would be impacted by the addition. Jim Touve, 17216 Peterborg Road, believed that the road was being ruined by the bus traffic. He added that blacktop was not made to hold up to bus traffic. Touve was concerned about cars parking on both sides of Peterborg Road during special events. Touve believed that the parking created dangerous situations and further that the parking was not adequate now, what would it be with the addition classrooms etc.. Enger replied that the road condition would need to be reviewed by the Engineering Department. Bauer asked what recommendation could be made for special event parking for schools. Enger recommended that a team concept be developed for each school with City Staff, School Officials, and neighbors. Enger did not believe that it was possible to design school parking for peak use. Enger also noted that City streets were not equal in all areas. Kardell question what additional parking requirements would be made with an approximate 30% 10 101 increase in space. Thompson replied that the increase would be approximately 120 students and 8 staff members. • Bauer believed that as the City grows the parking at special events would become a bigger issue. Hamilton noted that there were 154 parking spaces now and only 60 staff members which left 90 extra spaces. Enger noted that Staff needed to look at the fact that the street could be substandard in this instance. Touve stated that Peterborg Road was only 30 feet wide. Norman believed that the City should get stricter on parking restrictions to one side of the street only. Thompson believed that when you placed too much focus on parking you lost open space. Thompson did not believe that the City had a specific formula in place to calculate the parking. Enger reviewed the Staff Report recommendations. Enger added that Staff recommended that the school connect with the neighborhood trail system. l\10TION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of School District #272 for Site Plan Review on approximately 9.9 acres for construction of an 15,800 sq. ft. addition, with parking and circulation improvements, to the Prairie View Elementary School, based on plans dated March 2, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1992 with the addition the Staff review alternate parking arrangements and road standard and the school explore the possibility of saving at least 1 of the tennis courts. Motion carried 6-0-0. 10:L • • • ( c MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Donald R. Uram, Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Prairie View Elementary School The Prairie View Elementary School was constructed in 1965 on 9.9 acres of land. The existing building contains 66,954 square feet. The current proposal is to add an additional 15,807 square feet to the building including five classrooms, an art room, a music room, gymnasium and gymnasium storage. Additional work includes the remodeling of the existing media center. The total square footage of the building will be 82,761 with a Base Area Ratio of 19.2%. Construction is expected to begin in July, 1992 and be completed by September, 1993. The building additions will be constructed of facebrick, concrete and glass to match the existing materials. • Minimal grading is proposed to allow for the construction of the building additions. As a condition of the grading permit, the school district is required to resolve the existing drainage problem (water ponding) which occurs along the west property line at the 927 contour elevation. A grading solution shall be worked out in cooperation with the Engineering Department. • Based on a new building square footage of 15,807 square feet, a total of 49 caliper inches of plant material is required and proposed on the project site. Staff has asked the school district to provide a trail connection from the front of the Art/Music building to the existing trail along the west property line for additional access. Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 9.9 acres for the construction of a 15,807 square foot addition to the Prairie View Elementary School subject to: 1. Resolution of the drainage problem. 2. Addition of the trail connection. 3. Compliance with the Fire Marshal's recommendations. 103 ( ( MEMORAMDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Allen M. Nelson, Fire Marshal DATE: March 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Prairie View Elementary School Fire Code Requirements In reviewing the plans for the Prairie View Elementary School addition and remodel, we found several items that need to be addressed. The State Building Code division did a plan review of the 1990 remodel and had several requirement~ that have not yet been complied with. They required, among other things, that the access and hydrant locations meet Code, the building be completely sprinkled and area separation walls be installed. The Fire Code requires fire access roads and hydrants to be within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the building. These requirements can be modified if other fire protection features are installed. We would be willing to accept either of the following options or any equivalent proposal: • Option I: Provide fire department access and fire hydrants in accordance with • MUFC 10.207 and 10.301. Provide the fire separation walls and fire sprinkler system required in the August 17, 1990 letter from the State. Option 2: Provide a complete fire sprinkler system throughout and a fire hydrant on the east side of the building. Install a complete automatic fire alarm system throughout the entire building. Provide the area separation walls where required. In addition to the above requirements, the school will have to meet all other building and fire codes that apply. PVFlRECD.AMN: bs • • • • TO: MEMORANDUM Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect DATE: March 12, 1992 SUBJECr: Supplemental Report to March 6, 1992 Planning Staff Report for Prairie View School One item that needs clarification on the Planning Staff Report is the addition of the trail connection. Currently, the City accesses the park property with maintenance vehicles via the trail system at the southwest comer of the parking lot. The school will connect the park pedestrian system with the school pedestrian system, but the existing maintenance access must be maintained and incorporated. This can be achieved by maintaining turning radiuses and -providing a ten foot wide path for maintenance vehicles. Another item for discussion is the summer youth recreation programs held at Prairie View School/Park. Programs are staged in the warming house behind the school and accommodate 270 kids mid-June through mid-August. Access to the school building for drinking fountains and restrooms is necessary for this program, as well as space inside the gym on rainy days. Coordinating the programs with the construction so children can still be dropped off and have use of the building is necessary for this program to contiriue. BPC:mdd 10$ • • • Forest Hills Elementary School CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-68 A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 FOR FOREST Hll..LS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WHEREAS, Independent School District 272 has applied for site plan approval for Forest Hills Elementary School for construction of an 18,350 square foot addition with parking and circulation improvements on approximately 58 acres on property located at 13708 Holly Road currently zoned Public Zoning District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at . its March 9, 1992, Planning Commission meeting and recommends approval of said site plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1992, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Independent School District for Forest Hills Elementary School for construction of an 18,350 square foot addition with parking and circulation improvements based on plans dated February 11, 1992, subject to the following conditions: 1. The School District shall be required to submit for review and approval the following items prior to issuance of a building permit. a. A landscaping and tree replacement plan totalling 95 caliper inches. b. A mechanical equipment screening plan to City Code. c. A storm drainage and water quality plan for review by the City Engineer. This plan shall require a N.U.R.P. pond to pre-treat water prior to discharge into the creek. The parking lot and bus staging area will require catch basin and storm sewer. d. A lighting plan with light poles no greater than 20 feet high. The fixtures shall be a downcast cut-off design (shoebox) to minimize glare. e. The site plan shall be revised to indicate sidewalks along the main entrance drive from Holly Road to the school entrance. The plan shall also maintain sidewalk connections to the existing tennis court on the west side of the building and a connection to the bituminous trail which connects to a trail on Baker Road. f. Submit samples of proposed exterior materials for review. The facebrick will be g. of a color to match the existing brick on the building. Revise the grading plan to direct storm water away from the intersection on school property. The grading plan should be revised to stay away from the existing tile system in the low area on the east side of the building. The grading plan must also be examined to determine the amount of increased water runoff which may be beyond the capacity of the tile system. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the School District shall submit for review and approval: a. Drainage and erosion control plans to the Watershed District. b. Drainage erosion and utility plans to the City Engineer. c. Provide erosion control around the site grading limits and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in ~dvance of grading. _ 3. The loading dock is not screened according to City Code. The School District shall either revise the plan to screen the loading dock or submit a request for a variance. ADOPTED by the City Council on the 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 101 • • • • • c. • • Planning Commission Minutes March 9, 1992 FOREST HILLS ELEMENTARY by Independent School District 272 for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on approximately 58 acres for construction of an 18,350 square foot addition with parking and circulation improvements to the Forest Hills Elementary School. Location: 13708 Holly Road . 3 Enger reported that Staff had just received a memorandum from the Fire Marshall regarding this project and presented copies to the Planning Commission. • Steve Thompson, representing the proponent, presented the plans for an 18,000 square foot addition to the existing school. He said that the school's main concern with regard to the site plan was the safety of the children in the bus zone. Thompson pointed out that the parent drop off was on the outside of the bus zone which caused the children to cross in front of the buses. A new curb cut from Holly Road was proposed to allow bus only access into the bus zone area. The car traffic would enter at a separate entrance and the children would be dropped off opposite the bus zone. Sandstad asked if there would be an increase in parking spaces. Thompson replied that some parking spaces would be lost on the south end of the school as a part of eliminating the temporary drop-off and short term parking. Norman asked if the existing main parking lot would be tom out. Thompson replied that the sub grade for the existing lot would be disturbed as little as possible and as much of the original curb as possible would be kept in place as much as possible. Wissner asked if there would be signs to indicate the bus zone was for buses only. Thompson replied that the sign would probably say "Do Not Enter" refering to autos. Clinton asked if it was safe for the buses to back out. Thompson replied that the buses pull out in a forward manor and did not back up. Enger added that the buses only pull up to Withi. approximately 6-to-8 feet of the curb to allow them to tum and pull out in a forward direction Thompson reported that the new entrance had been positioned to provide a lotline alignment between the two existing homes across the street and still provide adequate site lines from both directions. . Five classrooms would be added to the southside of the building. The architecture would match the existing building. Thompson noted that some interior remodeling would be done, a gym added on the northside, and an elevator would be provided to make the gym handicap accessible. A 4 foot loading dock would be added. Norman asked if a classroom was being added on the northside of the building and if so at what level would it be added. Thompson replied that a music room would be added on the northside of the building. Bauer noted that at any of the schools when special events take place parking is a problem and questioned what the City did to take care of this problem. Enger replied that the City Code only partially addressed parking requirements and in many instances it was a judgement call. Enger stated that the recommendation was based on average parking needs on an average day. He added that the City did not require special event parking provisions for schools. Thompson 4 • • replied that during special events the bus zone would be used for car parking. Thompson reported that the School District would be meeting with the DNR and the Watershed District. Thompson believed that it was premature to say that a N.U.R.P. pond was necessary. Enger replied that the City had been under pressure from several government agencies to address storm water runoff issues and the City was currently operating under a mandate to require N.U.R.P. ponds. Enger noted that the City might not be able to defer to the DNR or the Watershed District to make a decision related to the requirement for a N.U.R.P. pond. John Hamilton, representing the proponent, stated that this was a playground area and questioned the safety of requiring a pond on school grounds. Enger replied that it could be possible that another technique could be used to provide the same results as a pond. Enger noted that Nine Mile Creek and a marsh area were close to the school and that ponding in that area should not cause a problem. Enger added that this was not a discretionary issue and Staff would work further with the proponent. Hamilton stated that he had not had a chance to absorb the memorandum from the Fire Marshall. He added that he was not sure at this time of the location of the fire hydrant. Enger questioned if the parking lot improvements were part of the proposal. Enger added that he had understood that there was to be a two stage bidding process and the parking lot improvements might not be done. Thompson replied that the school had recently given full committment to the site improvements and intended to proceed. Enger stated that he had attended the neighborhood meetings where an extra entrance to Holly Road had been discussed. The main concern was going up and down the hill when it was slippery. The redeeming factor for the entrance as proposed was the good site . lines in both directions. The Engineering Department did not recommend a midblock stop sign. Enger pointed out Attachment A in the Staff Report which provided an alternative site plan with a single point of access. Thompson stated that while the school shared the City'S concerns, approximately a dozen possible layouts had been considered and the school would take issue with Attachment A. Thompson said that while the layout did separate traffic it would not meet the school's requirements for diagonal parking for the buses. He added that this layout would require a fully monitored bus situation for safety. Thompson stated that the diagonal parking allowed for a smaller amount of space to accomplish the same affect. Thompson noted that visitor parking would not be provided with Attachment A. He further noted that the closer to Holly Road the poorer the soil conditions. Thompson reported that the proponent plan provided for separate areas for staff and visitor parking. Enger replied that Staff had spent a considerable amount of time looking at this situation. Enger noted that the dimensions for the bus loop parking in Attachment A were the same as proposed by the architects for the Central Middle School, which provided for diagonal parking. Enger stated that visitor parking was provided in Attachment A. Enger pointed out that in the architect's proposal all those who parked in the staff lot would need to cross the bus lot. Enger believed a 7-to-8 foot berm could be built close to Holly Road for 5 '}IO ( l screening of parking for the Staff alternate plan. He questioned whether there was difficulty in regrading the parking lot. Enger believed that ~ttachment A had merit. He pointed out that th. proponent's plan would also work and that eIther plan would greatly improve the existin situation. Enger stated that the City owned all of the land involved in this proposal; the School District had only purchased the footprint of the building. Enger added that the School District had conceptual approval only for this proposal from the City. Enger noted that a concrete exterior loading dock would not be allowed under City Code and this item would require further discussion between the proponent and Staff. Enger asked the proponent what the exterior brick color would be. Thompson replied that the proponent would attempt to match the exterior brick as best as possible, but would like some leave way in the color. Enger asked if the proponent was proposing a contrasting brick color. Thompson replied no. Enger outlined the Staff recommendations. He noted that the comments from the Fire Marshall were normally addressed further along in the process. Enger stated that Staff and the proponent would need to address further the issues of storm water runoff. 'Bauer stated that if this were a private contractor the Planning Commission would request to see brick samples and questioned why the School District should be given special treatment. Wissner believed that brick color was a very sensitive issue because of the results at the High School. Thompson replied that the High School was a special problem because the intent was to reduce the scale of the building mass. • Bauer was concerned that the School District was being given special treatment which would not be afforded to others. Hamilton replied that schools were on a shorter time line because of referendum issues. Hamilton added that the City had worked with fast-track development from private contractors also. Bauer stated that he would have difficulty passing this proposal along to the City Council because of the issues yet to be resolved. Bauer believed the item should be continued. Norman believed that the main issues were the site plan and the loading dock. Kardell stated that she was not comfortable approving plans which were not complete. The issues left to be resolved were the brick color, storm water runoff, and the loading dock. Sandstad asked the proponent to address the issue of the design in Attachment A matching that at the Central Middle School. Thompson replied that at the Middle School diagonal parking was only used along the straight curb portion. He added that the school did not support fanning out parking along the curb. Thompson believed that the parking should be either all diagonal or all parallel along the curb. Thompson emphasized that the main issues was the life safety issues for the children. 6 • III _u • • • Enger did not believe that the brick color was an issue if the developer said that they would match the existing. Enger added that the loading dock item still needed to be dealt with further . Thompson replied that this was the first time this had been mentioned and he was unaware this was not allowed by City Code. Enger stated that the Planning Commission could approve the plan without the loading dock. Hamilton noted that a loading dock had existed on the premises for over 20 years. George Stewart, resident, questioned if a sidewalk was proposed. Enger replied that the recommendation did not include a sidewalk on the south side of Holly Road. Stewart believed that it would be difficult for the buses to get up the hill from a dead start with the proposed entrance. Stewart questioned where the National Urban Runoff Policy (N.U.R.P.) pond would be located. Thompson replied the pond would be located on the north side of the building if it was needed. Thompson noted that the school would be meeting with Staff and the Watershed District to discuss the need for a pond further. Susan Banal, 6805 Rosemary Road, believed that it was paramount to have the children's safety foremost. She also wanted the trees to be left in place as much as possible for aesthetic purposes. Bauer asked if Staff had a strong preference between the proponents proposal for the parking lot and Attachment A from Staff; assuming that the road conditions could be met. Enger replied that if Attachment A could not provide diagonal parking it would not work. Enger added that Staff had believed that diagonal parking would work because the dimensions were the same as used at the Central Middle School which provides for diagonal parking. Enger said that if Attachment A bus parking would work as well as the proponent's plan Staff would prefer Attachment A. Norman questioned when Staff would know if Attachment A would work or not. Thompson replied that the Central Middle School design was different from Attachment A in that the diagonal parking was not along the curb. Thompson believed that the proponent had the expertise in this area after designing many of the local schools. Thompson further noted that Attachment A would not be acceptable to the School District from a financial standpoint and did not .11]~t the District'S goals. Clinton asked if the proponent's plant would create problems in the winter. Thompson replied that their engineers believed the plan as proposed would work well due to the visibility from both directions. Thompson added that only lout of 17 buses would go up the hill; the majority of the buses went in the opposite direction. Norman asked if both the cars and buses would use the same driveway. Thompson replied yes. Sandstad asked if it would be possible for the proponent to work out the remaining issues and return to the Planning Commission in two weeks. Thompson replied that he believed that the plan as proposed was the best possible solution . 7 Bauer believed that the loading dock would either need to be eliminated, brought up to City Code, or a variance requested. Bauer said the proponent had indicated that they would be. matching the existing brick as best as possible. Thompson replied that the proponent would match the existing brick. Bauer stated that the only remaining issue was if Attachment A or the proponent's proposal was the best parking lot layout. Enger replied that if diagonal bus parking would not work Attachment A would not solve the problem. Thompson stated that the proponent would match the existing brick, would either eliminate the loading dock or request a variance, and would install a N.U.R.P. pond if it was found necessary. MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton to recommend to the City Council approval of the request 'of School District #272 for Site Plan Review on approximately 58 acres for construction of an 18,350 sq. ft. addition, with parking and circulation improvements, to the Forest Hills Elementary School, based on plans dated March 2, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1992. Motion carried 6-0-0. 'll~ • • • MEMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council • • THROUGH: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect DATE: March 12, 1992 SUBJECT: Supplemental Report to March 6, 1992 Planning Staff Report for Forest Hills School One item that needs clarification on the Planning Staff Report is the drainage problem in the low area of the east side of the building. Tile drains were installed last year and seem to be effective in redirecting standing water. Additional grading in the area may damage the tile system and the increased run-off may be beyond the capacity of the tile system. This should be addressed as a potential problem by the architects. Summer youth recreation programs are held at Forest Hills School. The warming house accommodates most of the needs for 465 kids who participate mid-June through the end of August. Access to the school is necessary for restroom facilities and drinking fountains. The cafeteria or gym is used on rainy days as backup. Coordinating the construction so that access is still available for programs is necessary for these programs to continue to run smoothly. Staff will be flexible with alternate entries into the building and facilities inside the school, if access can remain available for these kids. IIU , STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: REQUEST: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning March 6, 1992 Forest Hills Elementary School 13708 Holly Road Independent School District 272 ( 1. Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 58 acres for the construction of an 18,350 square foot addition with parking and circulation improvements. LOCATION MAP 1 1\J) , e e· e • • • Staff Report Forest Hills School March 6, 1992 BACKGROUND ( ( This site is guided both elementary school and public open space. The property is currently zoned public. The school is a permitted use within the Public Zoning District.. The City Code requires that the School District receive a site plan approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The site plan review involves approximately 18,000 square feet of additional building and changes to the access and parking areas in the front of the building. SITE PLAN The existing school is 67,500 square feet. A building addition of 18,350 square feet is planned. The Base Area Ratio of the building to the total site is .03, which is low considering that commercial office buildings can typically develop up to a .30 Base Area Ratio. The building as proposed meets the minimum setback requirements for the Public Zoning District. ACCESS A1\1J) INTERNAL CIRCULATION The Site Plan Review Ordinance requires that provision be made for safe and convenient vehicle and pedestrian traffic, including interior drives and parking arrangements which facilitate clear access to public streets, appropriate widths for drives and access points, and separation of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. The site plan as proposed is consistent with this provision of the S~te Plan Review Ordinance. The redesign of the site plan in the front of the building provides a separate entrance for parking, drop-off, and buses. The plan requires a second access on the Holly Road approximately 420 feet west of the Rosemary Lane intersection. This driveway access is located at the base of the hill on Holly Road. The Engineering Department has reviewed the location of the proposed access and has determined that the intersection has adequate site vision distance in both directions. Attachment A represents an alternative way of providing access to the property which uses the existing entrance unto Holly Road but would also separate parking, drop-off, and bus traffic. This plan as suggested by Staff uses the existing entrance to Holly Road, provides a shorter distance to drop-off for automobiles, provides room for bus and auto traffic immediately adjacent to the front door, and provides for potential future parking expansion to the west. The access and circulation plan as proposed is acceptable to City Staff. It is suggested that the School District consider the Staff alternative because of the benefits listed above . 2 Staff Report Forest Hills School March 6, 1992 SHORELAND ORDINANCE ( The creek on this site has a Shoreland classification of Tributary. The Shoreland District extends 300 feet from the top of the creek bank or the width of the flood plain, whichever is greater. The school is 340 feet from the bank of the creek. The proposed site plan is in compliance with the Shoreland regulations for lot size, width and setback. There is no impervious surface with the Shoreland area. GRADING AND DRAINAGE There are two existing drainage problems on site which should be corrected. One is at the intersection of Rosemary Drive and Holly Road. The higher ground on the north side of Holly Road, contributes to standing water at the intersection during periods of heavy rainfall. Revising the grading plan to direct water away from this intersection on the school property, can improve this problem. The second drainage problem is a low area off the east side of the building. Tile drains were installed in this location some time ago, however, the drain system is not effective. Since the • site is being regraded for the expansion of the school, an opportunity exists to provide a swale • to better drain this low area. ARCHITECTURE The City Code requires 75 % of the exterior materials on the building be facebrick, glass or stone. The building as proposed with expansion meets this requirement. The facebrick will be of a color to match the existing brick on the building. A mechanical equipment screening plan must be submitted for review. TREE WSS/LANDSCAPING There are a total of 248 inches of significant trees which are 12 inches or greater in diameter on site. The site plan as proposed would remove 72 inches or 29 % of the total trees. This results in a tree replacement of 28 inches. The City Code requires that landscaping be installed on the property based upon square footage of the building. Based on 18,350 square feet of the building addition, 57 caliper inches of trees are required. 3 1\1 • • Staff Report Forest Hills School March 6, 1992 ( The City Code requires that the parking areas be screened from Holly Road. The proposed benning adjacent to Holly Road will screen the parking areas. The school district must submit a landscaping tree replacement plan for a total of 95 caliper inches prior to review by the City Council. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS The site plan as proposed would remove a number of sidewalks and trails on the property. Sidewalks should be required along the main entrance drives from Holly Road to the school. . In addition, sidewalk or trail connections must be maintained between the tennis court on the west side of the building and the school, and a connection to the bituminous trail which connects to the ,trail on Baker Road. STORM\V ATER RUNOFF The storm sewer plan proposes to route water directly into the creek. State and Federal law currently require N. U.R.P. (National Urban Protection Program) ponds to pretreat water prior • to discharge into the creek. • The parking lot and bus staging area will require catch basin and storm sewer. Prior to review by the City Council, proponent shall submit a storm drainage and water quality plan for review by the City Engineer. LIGHTING Since the parking lot is adjacent to a residential area, the light poles should be go greater than 20' high. The fixture should be a downcast cutoff design (shoebox) to minimize off-site glare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the site plan review for Independent School District 272 for 18,350'square feet of building addition on 58 acres based on plans dated March 6, 1992 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 6, 1992 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall submit for review and approval: 4 Staff Report Forest Hills School March 6, 1992 ( ( A. A landscaping and tree replacement plan totalling 95 caliper inches. B. A revised site access and parking plan. C. A mechanical equipment screening plan. 2. Prior to building permit issuance the proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. A fire access and occupancy plan. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance proponent shall submit for review and approval: A. Drainage and erosion control plans to the Watershed District. B. Drainage, erosion and utility plans to the City Engineer. 4. Provide erosion control around the site grading limits and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. FHILLS.MDF:bs 5 • • • • .: ----_ .. -----.~'-.---.----- .- • .... ~ . ( . HOLLY ROAD A"",Att\l1 WT A .. (' ( MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect DATE: March 12, 1992 SUBJECT: Supplemental Report to March 6, 1992 Planning Staff Report for Forest Hills School One item that needs clarification on the Planning Staff Report is the drainage problem in the low area of the east side of the building. Tile drains were installed last year and seem to be effective in redirecting standing water. Additional grading in the area may damage the tile system and the increased run-off may be beyond the capacity of the tile system. This should be addressed as a potential problem by the architects. • Summer youth recreation programs are held at Forest Hills School. The warming house accommodates most of the needs for 465 kids who participate mid-June through the end of August. Access to the school is necessary for restroom facilities and drinking fountains. The • cafeteria or gym is used on rainy days as backup. Coordinating the construction so that access is still available for programs is necessary for these programs to continue to run smoothly. Staff will be flexible with alternate entries into the building and facilities inside the school, if access can remain available for these kids. • 1~O • • • ( MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Allen M. Nelson, Fire Marshal DATE: March 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Forest Hills Elementary School Fire Code Requirements In reviewing the plans for the Forest Hills Elementary School addition, a problem was found with the Fire Department Access and fire hydrant location. The Fire Code requires fire access roads and hydrants to be within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the building. These requirements can be modified if there are other fire protection items in the building. We would be willing to accept either of the following options or any equivalent proposal: Option 1: Provide Fire Department access and fire hydrants in accordance with MUFC 10.207 and 10.301 (c). In addition, install the fire sprinkler system proposed. Option 2: Provide a complete fire sprinkler system throughout. In addition, install a fire hydrant in an accessible location near the new Fire Department connection. Install a complete automatic fire alarm system throughout the building. In addition to the above requirements, the school will have to meet all other building and fire codes that apply. FHFIRECD.AMN:bs PHONE NO. (~ ( ~rMT~T~©lr~ ~~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR METRO WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55tJe~O. 772-7910 February 26, 1992 Mr. Chris Enger city of Eden Prairie Planning Dept. 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: FOREST HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION, UNNAMED WATERCOURSE, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr Enger: We have reviewed the site plans (received February 12, 1992) for the above-referenced project (SW1/4, section 3, T116N, R22W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. An unnamed protected watercourse is on the proposed site. Any activity below the top of the bank of the channel, which alters the course, current or cross-section of a protected watercourse, is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR protected waters permit. 2. It appears that the stormwater is being routed directly to the protected watercourse. stormwater sedimentation/ treatment basins, or other appropriate stormwater treatment features, should be included in the plan. If stormwater is routed directly to the watercourse it can cause sedimentation and flooding downstream that are detrimental to the stream's wildlife values and water quality. 3. The project does not appear to be within a designated floodplain. 4. The protected watercourse has a shoreland classification of Tributary. The shoreland district extends 300 feet from the top of the bank, or the width of the floodplain, which ever is greater. Forest Hill School expansion should be consistent with state shoreland management standards. In particular you should note: a. The vegetation and topography should be retained in a natural state l.n the shore impact zone. The minimum shore impact zone is a 25' strip along both sides of the creek. b. Less than 25 percent of the lot within the shore land district should be impervious surface. 1 ).J~ AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • • • • Mr. Enger February 26, 1992 Page Two (2) 5. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. 6. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to c;>btain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, , Q~~.lJ. ~ 60e Richter Staff Hydrologist cc: Bob Obermeyer, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WMO Unnamed Protected Watercourse File City of Eden Prairie Shoreland File • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEpmCOUNTY,~OTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-69 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR xvm URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOP:MENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZmG ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban Hennepin County Commumty Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has developed a proposal for the use of urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, following a public hearing on April 7, 1992 to obtain the views of citizens in local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's following proposed use of $88,731 from the Year XVIII Urban Hennepin County Comm~ty Development Block Grant, and $0.00 in program related income: PROJECTS Senior Center Elevator Installation Housing Rehabilitation Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) Subsidized Daycare Program (GMDCA) Sign Language Interpreters (EP Adaptive Rec.) BUDGET $15,000 $55,985 $ 5,460 $11,486 $ 800 BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie approves the proposed use of Year xvrn Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant fun~s and program related income and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion in the Year xvrn Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST; John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: David Lindahl, Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 25, 1992 SUBJECf: YEAR xvm (1992-93) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDING PROPOSALS Eden Prairie is eligible to apply for $88,731 in CpBG funds for Year XVIII (1992-93), which is an eleven percent increase from last year. The national objectives of the CDBG program include: • Developing viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income persons. • Aiding in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight. • Meeting other community development needs having particular urgency. Request to Council: • Each year the Human Rights and Services Commission review all requests for CDBG funding and make • recommendations to the City Council on the activities to be funded. Requests for funding were presented to the Commission at the March 9, 1992 meeting. The Commission recommended that the City Council consider approving the following activities for Year XVIII CDBG funding: Activity - Funding Amount - Agency/Contact - Purpose - Clients Served - Activity - Funding Amount - Agency/Contact - Purpose - Recommendation #1 CHILD CARE SUBSIDY PROGRAM (public Service) $11,486 Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GMDCA) -Grace Norris Provide child day care assistance to lower income families in Eden Prairie who are working/training a minimum of 25 hours per week. The City has . been funding this activity since 1986. Eleven (11) Eden Prairie families and the same number of children were served in 1991. Recommendation #2 HOUSEHOLD & OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE FORELDERL Y (HOME) (public Service) $5,460 (4% increase from 1990) Senior Community Services -Betty Crouch • Provide maintenance and chore services to persons 60 and older. The City has been funding this activity since 1982. • • • Clients Served - Activity - Funding Amount - Agency/Contact - Purpose - Clients Served - HOME served 31 households and 38 clients in 1991. Recommendation #3 SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS (Public Service) $800 City of E.P. Adaptive Recreation Program -Tria Vikesland Provide recreation programs and related services to disabled persons in Eden Prairie. CDBG funds will be used to provide sign language interpreters for hearing impaired individuals participating in adaptive recreation programs, attending City meetings, or involved in other City sponsored activities. Six (6) persons participated in five programs and one city meeting in 1991. Total funding for public service activities is $17,746. This satisfies Hennepin County's requirement that all participating cities keep their public service funding within twenty percent (20%) of their total CDBG allocation, which is $17,746 for Eden Prairie. Activity - Funding Amount - Agency/Contact - Purpose - Clients Served - Activity - Funding Amount - Agency/Contact - Purpose - Recommendation #4 HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM $55,985 City of Eden Prairie Planning Department -David Lindahl Provides low-interest deferred loans of up to $10,000 to eligible residents for home improvements. Loans recovered when recipients sell their homes. All recovered funds rolled back into the program. Fourteen (14) clients were served in 1991. Recommendation #5 SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENTS (Elevator or Chair-lift Purchase/Installation) $15,000 -This will pay portion of cost. City of EP Parks Department -Barb Cross Remove architectural barriers at Senior Center by providing full access to all three levels of building to the physically disabled. This will help the City meet the provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), which is a civil rights statute enacted by Congress to protect the rights of the disabled. Existing buildings that are places of public accommodation including "senior centers," must remove architectural barriers and make them accessible and usable to the disabled. The only exception to this requirement is if the improvements are not "readily achievable.· Readily achievable means the required improvements can be done with little difficulty or expense. 2 2) 3) Provides child daycare assistance to lower income families in Eden Prairie who are working/training a minimum of 2S hours/week. The City has been funding this activity since 1986. HOUSEHOLD AND OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE FOR ELDERLY (HOME) Provides household and light maintenance services for seniors 60 and older. Services include: heavy house cleaning, laundry, snow removal, small appliance repair, grocery shopping, and light carpentry work. The City has been funding this activity since 1982. HOUSING REHABll..ITATION PROGRAM Provides low-interest deferred loans of up to $10,000 to eligible residents for home improvements. Loans recovered when recipients sell their homes. All recovered funds rolled back into the program. City has been administering this program since 1980. $15,199 $3,457 $24,434 35~---------------------------------------------------------------' 31 30+-------------------------------------------------------- 254-----------------------------------~~-------------- 22 22 204------------------------ 16 15+---------------- 10 -f----'D------- 5 o 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 o CHILD CARE _ HOME _ REHAB _ SCAT SITE Imml·MHFA • MIIFA not funded by CDBG 3 I~I 31 135 14 45 • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, !\,Ill\'NESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-49 RESOLUTION AMENDING THE YEAR XVII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY STATEMENT OF PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, through a joint cooperation agreement with Hennepin County is a participant in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie on August 29, 1991 executed Hennepin County Contract No.l A07491, (Year xvn Subrecipient Agreement) which governs the implementation . of approved activities in the urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program, and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie held a public hearing on April 7, 1992 to consider public comments on a proposed amendment to the Year xvn Urban H.ennepin County Statement of Projected use of Funds, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie now amends the Year xvn Urban Hennepin County Statement of Projected Use of Funds by transferring $15,000 from #52037, Eden Prairie Home Ownership Program to #52038, Housing Rehabilitation, and $9,434.50 from 52037, to Removal of Architectural Barriers at new City Hall (new project). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that the City Council of Eden Prairie authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute Amendment No.1 to Contract A07491 to implement the subject amendment to the Year XVII Urban Hennepin County Statement of Proposed Use of Funds. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: David Lindahl, Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning DATE: March 25, 1992 SUBJECf: REPROGRAMMING OF SCA TIERED SITE HOUSING FUNDS Request to Council: The Human Rights and Services Commission recommended at the March 9, 1992 meeting that the City Council discontinue the Scattered Site Housing Program and reprogram the remaining budget of $24,434.50 to fulfill other community needs. The Commission recommended reprogramming the Scattered Site funds as follows: 1) 2) Transfer $15,000 to the Housing Rehab Program to help meet growing demand for this Program~ This amount combined with the proposed Yr. xvrn budget of $55,985 will total $70,985. Transfer the balance of funds ($9,434.50) to a new activity that would be created to remove architectural barriers at the new City Hall building. These funds would help the City comply with the provisions of the new Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA requires owners of existing buildings that are places of public accommodation to remove architectural barriers and make them accessible and usable to the disabled. These requirements apply only if the improvements are "readily achievable," or can be done with little difficulty and expense. These funds will help cut down the costs of improving the CPT building to accommodate the new City Hall. Purpose: The City approved the use of CDBG funds for the Scattered Site Housing Program (SSHP) in 1991. This Program provides up to $10,000 to lower income first time home buyers to purchase homes in Eden Prairie. The City also is participating in the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's (MHFA) "Minnesota Cities Participation Program," which provides low interest loans to lower income first time buyers. Since this Program provides the same benefit to lower income home buyers as the City's SSHP, there is no need to continue the SSHP as long as the City continues to participate in the MHF A program. e e- e • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-27 VACA nON OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON PART OF OUTLOT A, MENARD ADDmON VAC 92-01 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described as follows: The drainage and utility easements delineated and dedicated on the plat of Menard Addition over, under and across Outlot A, Menard Addition except that part embraced within Menard 2nd Addition. Together with A 25.00 foot wide permanent drainage and utility easement over, under and across part of Outlot A. Menard Addition. acording to the recorded plat thereof. Said permanent drainage and utility easement being 25.00 feet wide and lying northeasterly of and parallel and adjacent to the following described line. Commencing at the Southwest comer of said Outlot A, said comer also lying on the west line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 116, Range 22, said west line also being the west line of the Menard Addition; thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 30 minutes 51.6 seconds West along said West line a distance of 891.28 feet; thence North 89 degrees 29 minutes 08.4 secondS East a distance of 33.55 feet to the point of beginning of the easement line to be described; thence South 21 degrees 30 minutes 51.6 seconds East a distance of 210.00 feet and said line there terminating • Said 25.00 foot wide easement was granted in Doc. No. 1595590 (see Easement 12C). WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 7, 1992 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings iIi accordance with M.S.A. 412.851 ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk P"AiRl;:' . 1"\ ••••• - V;Sy I":'-··:;J:'R " .. :...1'-: ..... PLAZA W. 78 TH ST. ~~CO·L,A T!O 1\1 MAP • ex:> N • w '¢ o N N . ~ o z • EASEMENT VACATION SKETCH /' _ DRAINAGE & UTIUTY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1595590 206.82 N 88'37'56" W A / , , ., S 76'16'18" W' 92.93 VA~_ 92-01 .~ I \. ;:; o i777/ llZL7.Z2f ~~--- 10 Be;; ~ mCA IE D ), , I , (") 'I -' 'I,' H H .. ;~ ~~ .. -I ::~ ~O , ~~ I ..... z· I ::;.. ~~ VAC. ~Z-Ol • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-29 VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, WYNDHAM KNOLL VAC 92-02 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described as follows: All drainage and utility easements on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Wyndham Knoll, according to the plat thereof on fue and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 7, 1992 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851 ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk .... z ,",,0 1 11-----1 ,\_---- " , ." -' .. • - -L-OCA-rr ot\r----MAP ~~,~ (1~~ : 0 -o-'-----~----------~~----~~----------~~~~~~----~~-----10- to '2.6 .47 • • .: :\,~.' ..,....- • 1-, I I t • ~ 40.00 ... ':. .. ...... ....... ..... . ....... . "' ..:.-.- ~NORIH 0 §PIBQSQntvIBw ,\ \ "1/ "I I <::) ~I ,.- J EA5~M~N-r~ "TO B6. -'VAC.A ,E:"D <~ \ " ;'::': ~ Q .....~" -' .... ~ .,.- '.:' ''';;'' -0>0 ' ... ~ .... : .....:...\ J ?> (P w;.. ' . .... ie, '. f-··: .... " : ./ ,--.,. ···l .. 2 . .. -:~ . . -. .. ..; . .. . '-: ..... .'. : .--:, ... . -.: I ' ' ' .. . .. ! I I 80 WYNDHAM KNOLL 2ND ADDITION ~ 1 o 01 r:~'.:'·".I-i'''r-·'' ..... I t_ ...... ~ ... ·M.~."._ ~.' , i' ! 1I ,., .' -, . , t .'10 I )---.-.• I I \ r-' ./ I \ \ . I I ...... • VAC. CfZ-OZ APRIL 7.1992 23004 23005 • 06 07 23008 23009 23010 23011 23012 23013 23014 23015 23016 23017 23018 23019 23020 23021 23022 23023 23024 23025 23026 23027 23028 23029 • 30 31 23032 23033 23034 23035 23036 23037 23038 23039 23040 23041 23042 23043 23044 23045 23046 23047 23048 23049 23050 23051 U S POSTMASTER FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY GERALD BOESPFLUG MN ASSN OF WOMEN POLICE MIG COMMUNICATIONS MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MINNESOTA CLE IMI -MN CHAPTER COOKIES BY DEB JEFF BERG PETER VOSBEEK HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTAGE STAMPS-ELECTIONS DEPT PAYROLL 3-6-92 SERVICE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT MANUAL-PARK PLANNING -HUNTER EDUCATION INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM/FEES PAID CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT -LICENSE FOR PUBLIC POOL & WADING POOL- COMMUNITY CENTER MIG COMMUNICATIONS MANUAL-PARK PLANNING DEPT BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR EAGLE WINE CO WINE .~ GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE PRIOR WINE CO WINE QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 3-6-92 SAVINGS BONDS GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 3-6-92 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 3-6-92 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 3-6-92 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 3-6-92 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG MARCH 92 UNION DUES MN STATE RETIREMENT ASSN PAYROLL 3-6-92 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 3-6-92 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 3-6-92 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 3-6-92 JENNIFER BElTO REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING LESSONS JOAN MCKEE REFUND-DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT VIKING LABORATORIES CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER AMERICAN RED CROSS CONFERENCE-AQUATICS SUPERVISOR MN DEPT OF HEALTH CONFERENCE-UTILITIES DIVISION GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-PARK & RECREATION DEPT MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN CONFERENCE-PARK & RECREATION DEPT CAREER TRACK SEMINARS CONFERENCE-PARK & RECREATION DEPT EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONFERENCE-CITY HALL MGMT STAFF MUNICI-PALS 1992 DUES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES MN DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSE APPLICATION-UTILITIES DIVISION AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICES CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT JUSTUS LUMBER CO -ANCHOR SCREW BITIBRACKETS/KNOBS/LUMBER/ -STUDSIVENEERIBRUSHESINAILSIPAINTIVARNISH/ -HINGES/SHELF SUPPORTS/FORMICA/STUD SENSOR/ -TAPE/OUTLETS/NUTS & BOLTSIHARDWARE-CITY .52 CAR CO AUTO PARTS CO HALL/STREET DEPTIUTILITIES DIVISION -RECONDITIONED HEADS FOR POLICE VEHICLE- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16651715 29.00 65212.06 30753.01 90.00 80.00 46.45 80.00 150.00 165.00 11.18 50.00 50.00 341.00 43.45 782.42 118.00 4411.11 5077.78 3544.69 1941.07 4120.46 150.00 6479.00 212.77 2473.76 32.00 1153.00 50.00 25.00 34508.36 164.50 67.00 5.00 75.00 150.00 20.00 840.00 15.00 115.00 35.00 50.00 49.00 130.00 5.00 135.00 168.00 253.00 1866.50 193.58 23053 MERLINS HARL'WARE HANK -HOOKS IH INGES/SCREWS/CEMENTIBRUSHES/PAI NT/ 716.23 -MAIL BOXINUMBERSIDRILL BITS/PLEXIGLASS/ -NAILS/SAW BLADESIROLLER COVERS/OIL/KEYS/ -SANDPAPER/SANDING BELTS/CASTERSIRIVETS/ • -EXTENSION CORDSITAPEIPLUGS/ANTI-FREEZE/ -WAXIPADLOCK-POLICE DEPT/STREET DEPTIPARK MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 23054 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 208.50 23055 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 123.17 23056 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 5621.00 23057 PETI'Y CASH CHANGE FUND-AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 50.00 23058 USPCA CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 125.00 23059 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICES CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 115.00 23060 MGIA CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 165.00 23061 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY CENTER 105.00 23062 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE-AWARDS BANQUET INVITATIONS 55.20 23063 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 834.49 23064 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 7819.93 23065 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR 8321. 75 23066 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE ". 274.95 23067 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR 5372.93 23068 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1356.74 23069 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO WINE 4652.98 23070 PETrY CASH -EXPENSES-CITY HALLIWATER DEPT/SENIOR CTR/ 76.88 ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 23071 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 23072 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER FEBRUARY 92 BUILDING SURCHARGES 4000.31 23073 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM FEBRUARY 92 SAC CHARGES 35343.00 23074 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY MARCH 92 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 2568.07 23075 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE MARCH 92 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM 297_ 23076 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 11-15-91 331~ . 23077 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 23078 JULIE" AASGAARD REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 41.00 23079 JENNY ROOT REFUND-CREATIVE MEMORIES CLASS 10.00 23080 HIGHLAND BEACH HOLIDAY INN CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPT 470.88 23081 ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 105.00 23082 AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 30.00 23083 MN CRIME PREVENTION OFFICERS ASSN CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 25.00 23084 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER CONFERENCE LODGING & FOOD-POLICE DEPT 193.82 23085 MN ASSN FOR CRIME VICTIMS CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 40.00 23086 STATE OF MINNESOTA -MN CRIMINAL CODE & STATUTES/MOTOR VEHICLE 885.60 TRAFFIC LAWS-POLICE DEPT 23087 JULIEN INN CONFERENCE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 199.47 23088 MN FIRE SERVICE BOARD STATE CERTIFICATION FEES-FIRE DEPT 385.00 23089 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY COPY PAPER-CITY HALL 490.00 23090 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 553.09 23091 AT&T SERVICE 35.17 23092 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 67.65 23093 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE 93.67 23094 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 12482.05 23095 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 55.25 23096 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 312.67 23097 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 154.01 23098 CHERYL POLING REFUND-DISNEY ON ICE SHOW 37.00 13076065 • APRIL 7.1992 23099 VOID OUT CHECK 0,00 23100 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 3-20-92 66289.93 .~ BIRTCHER WELSH APRIL 92 RENT-CITY HALL 22028.32 BLINDS & DESIGNS -OOWN PAYMENT FOR WINDOW BLINDS/HARIWARE & 74.00 INSTALLATION-FIRE STATION 23103 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 29.67 23104 TIMOTHY BECKMAN REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEE 73.32 23105 ADELINE BRAMWELL REFUND-DANCING CLASS 15.00 23106 WENDY CAMPBELL REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 35.00 23107 CYNTHIA CHRISTENSEN REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 35.00 23108 JOE CZERNIECKL REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 17.50 23109 LYNN ERBACH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 23110 MARY ESMOND REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 17.50 23111 DONNA HARRI SON REFUND-SKATE1ILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 17.50 23112 CINDY HORGEN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 23113 JULIE LITILE REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 17.50 23114 P M MCPHILLIPS REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 35.00 23115 DEBRA NEHER REFUND-SKATEVILLE/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 17.50 23116 HEALTH EDUCATION SERVICES MANUALS & STANDARDS-WATER DEPT 49.00 23117 ATOM CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 40.00 23118 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 217.67 23119 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 3748.15 23120 JOHNSON-BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE 5630.18 23121 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 3635.45 23122 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 433.04 23123 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR 1545.41 23124 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 3-20-92 SAVINGS BONDS 150.00 23125 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 3-20-92 6504.00 -~ HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 3-20-92 230.78 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 3-20-92 2573.76 28 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 3-20-92 32.00 . 23129 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 3-20-92 609.12 23130 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC APRIL 92 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 18300.30 23131 MEDICA CHOICE APRIL 92 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 39474.70 23132 MN STATE RETIREMENT ASSN PAYROLL 3-20-92 50.00 23133 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 3-20-92 25.00 23134 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 3-6-92 & 3-20-92 1200.00 23135 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA APRIL 92 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 201.00 23136 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 3-20-92 34362.50 23137 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 3-20-92 80.00 23138 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 3-20-92 164.50 23139 U-HAUL TRAILER HITCHES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 350.00 23140 MN OFFICE OF VOLUNTEER SERVICES CONFERENCE-SENIOR CENTER 22.00 23141 DAYS INN CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPT 181.24 23142 CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 55.00 23143 EASTMAN NATURE CENTER SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 22.00 23144 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPI'ER CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 125.00 23145 WARNING LITES OF MN CONFERENCE-STREET MAINTENANCE 80.00 23146 CITY OF RICHFIELD MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 1020.25 23147 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER -HELIUM/HELIUM TANK RENTAL/COOLER RENTAL-92.26 -POOL SPECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM/SOCIAL EVENTS PROGRAM 23148 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC -PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES-CITY HALL/POLICE 179.80 DEPT .9 AEF CAPITAL COMMUNICATIONS GEAR REDUCERS-WATER DEPT 252.00 21037985 APRIL 7.1992 23150 AIRSIGNAL INC MARCH 92 PAGER SERVICE 382.00 23151 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO -VIDEO TAPES/CASES/CABLE-POLICE DEPT/ 184. SOFTWARE UPGRADE-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 23152 AMERICAN RED CROSS -WORKBOOKSIBINDERSITEXTBOOKS-AQUATICS & 29 .... FITNESS PROGRAMIPOOL LESSONS 23153 AM SOCIETY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT DUES-POLICE DEPT 35.00 23154 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC -SAFETY TRAINING & EQUIPMENT VIDEO WITH 403.42 STUDY GUIDES-WATER DEPT 23155 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC SIGNS-STREET MAINTENANCE 64.43 23156 ARMOR SECURITY INC -2ND QTR 92 SECURITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT..., 319.10 -OUTDOOR CENTERILOCK REPAIRIPANIC BAR REPAIRED/CYLINDERS REPLACED-FIRE STATION 23157 ASSOCIATED PUBLIC-SAFETY COMMUNIC DUES-POLICE DEPT 60.00 23158 ASSN OF TRAINING OFFICERS CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 25.00 23159 ATLAS FOUNDATION CO LOG SKIDDER RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1700.00 23160 AUDIO VISUAL WHOLESALERS SLIDE STACK LOADER-FORESTRY DEPT 59.95 23161 B & STOOLS -CHISELSIPUNCHESITORCHIDISC BRAKES/SOCKETS/ 263.95 -SCREWDRIVERIDRILL BITSIWIRE STRIPPER/ HANDLE-EQUIPMENT MAINTIWATER DEPT 23162 -BACONS ELECTRIC CO LAMPS-WATER DEPT 400.24 23163 CHARLIE BAHN -STETHOSCOPEIDRILL/IGNITION WRENCH SET/ 718.05 -ADAPTER/SOCKETIBRAKE TOOLIBREAKER BAR/ SAWS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23164 JEFF BARTZ BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 96.00 23165 DAVID BECKER CONFERENCE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 27.50 23166 ANITA BECHTEL -CRAFT INSTRUCTOR-AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM/ 91.00 FEES PAID 23167 BELL ATLANTIC TRlCON LEASING CORP -APRIL 92 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE 351 DEPT 23168 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC -SERVICE-TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR HERITAGE RD & 396 . 4 LEONA RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 23169 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY EXPENSES-ELECTIONS DEPT 32.00 23170 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 499.13 23171 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON -FEBRUARY 92 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE-$492/ 558.00 -CITYS PORTION OF SPRING & SUMMER BROCHURE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 23172 PATRICIA BESSER VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 585.00 23173 LOIS BOETTCHER -MINUTES-PARKS RECREATION & NATURAL 174.05 RESOURCES COMMIHISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM 23174 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC FORD CAB & CHASSIS-SEWER DEPT 15224.00 . 23175 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING INC SERVICE-SHADY OAK RD/62ND ST WEST 12949.75 23176 BRINGERS EXPENSES-ELECTIONS 608.13 23177 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC -VACUUM CLEANER REPAIRS/SWITCHES-47.60 FACILITIES DEPT 23178 BRO-TEX INC TOWELS-FACILTIES DEPTIEQUIPMENT MAINT 369.76 23179 PAUL BROWN VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 195.00 23180 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE 692.50 23181 THOMAS BUCHNER -SERVICE-QUALITY TEAM COACHING 6000.00 CONSULTATION-CITY MGMT STAFF 23182 NATHAN BUCK SOFTBALL & VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1105.00 23183 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC MARCH 92 WASTE DISPOSAL-LIQUOR STORES 120.07 23184 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE PUBLICATIONS-FACILITIES DEPT 55.26 23185 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 60.00 23186 C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC TOOL CHESTSIBAR RACK-WATER DEPT 6_ 23187 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS LCD DISPLAY REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 5101430 1lf I APRIL 7.1992 23188 CARGILL SALT DIVISION 23189 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS .~ 23192 23193 23194 23195 23196 23197 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC BILL CLARK OIL CO INC JAMES CLARK CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCTS COMM CENTER COMPUTER RENAISSANCE INC CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC COPIER ALTERNATIVES 23198 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC 23199 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC 23200 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC 23201 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY 23202 DALCO 23203 DAN & DANS MINUTEMAN PRESS 23204 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 23205 DEM CON LANDFILL INC 23206 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 23207 DEXIS CORPORATION 23208 FRANCES P DEWELL 23209 DISPATCH COMMUNICATIONS I~ DIVERSIFIED CLEANING SERVICES DPC INDUSTRIES INC DRISKILLS SUPER VALU 23213 DYNA SYSTEMS 23214 E P PHOTO 23215 E P PHOTO 23216 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 23217 EDEN INCENTIVES & PROMOTIONS 23218 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 23219 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY CLUB 23220 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 23221 CITY OF EDINA 23222 DEB EDLUND 23223 JOHN H EKLUND 23224 ELIM SHORES 23225 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS 23226 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC 23227 23228 .9 JEFFREY R ELWELL EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC CHRIS ENGER 2266319 SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET MAINTENANCE -2 STEEL SAWS-$1620-FIRE DEPTIRE-COIL ROPEI SCREWSIHANDLESIROPE END-PARK MAINTENANCE FLOOR RUNNERS-FIRE DEPT ~ LUBRICANT-WATER DEPT MARCH 92 EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RADIO ANTENNAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COMPUTER SOFTWARE-FIRE DEPT EAR PLUGS-SAFETY DEPT -FEBRUARY 92 COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- CITY HALL MARCH 92 INSURANCE CONSULTANT SERVICE SPATULA SPOON-WATER DEPT -DRILL BITS/COTTER PINS/SILlCONE/SCREWS- PARK MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR/wATER DEPT PRINTING FORMS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT -INSTALLED AIR CONDITIONING CABIN PRESSURIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE FEBRUARY 92 WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINT TANK LICENSE-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG COMPUTER SOFTWARE-FIRE DEPT DANCE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID -REMOVED & REINSTALLED RADIO EQUIPMENT -FROM METHODIST HOSPITAL TO HIDDEN PONDS RESERVOIR-POLICE DEPT CARPET CLEANING SERVICE-LIQUOR STORES CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT DRILL BITS-WATER DEPT FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/FIRE DEPT -FEBRUARY 92 COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTI TONER-CITY HALL ANNIVERSARY MUGS-FIRE DEPT EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATIONIHUMAN RESOURCES -PLAQUES/PROCLAMATION FOR JERRY BURNS DAY- CITY HALL -CITYS SHARE OF FENCE REPAIR BETWEEN HIGH SCHOOL & COMMUNITY CENTER FEBRUARY 92 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION -FEBRUARY 92 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE- FORESTRY DEPT -ICE CREAM/ BOWLS/SPOONSINAPKINS/COFFE CUPS-SENIOR PROGRAMS TRASH GUARDS-SEWER DEPT -FACE MASKS/INSOLE CUSHIONS/PVC BOOT- SAFETY DEPTIUTILITIES DIVISION MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER SERVICE-TRUCK PUMP TESTING-FIRE DEPT MARCH 92 EXPENSES-PLANNING DEPT 1141.22 1639.61 112.50 500.90 200.00 112.41 213.00 199.99 43.01 91.48 610.00 9.29 271.95 6840.27 600.25 124.83 1223.00 90.00 10.00 86.00 400.00 710.00 155.00 1295.00 224.82 543.67 175.46 43.80 981.41 756.41 47.00 97.27 1110.00 245.00 125.00 450.00 18.40 186.20 257.00 17.50 504.54 200.00 APRIL 7.1992 23230 ENVIRO-TECH STRAW BALES-PARK MAINTENANCE 37.50 23231 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE ~iI 23232 BRAD ERICKSEN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 23233 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 26 • 0 23234 FAIRVIEW LAB BLOOD TESTS-POLICE DEPT 126.80 23235 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 3461.13 23236 MARY FIGG EXPENSES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 30.18 23237 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES TIE WRAPS-PARK MAINTENANCE 200.00 23238 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN TRAINING MANUALS-FIRE DEPT 180.00 23239 FLOYD SECURITY -2ND QTR 92 SECURITY MAINTENANCE AGREEt1ENT-403.00 LIQUOR STORE 23240 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 12.00 23241 STUART C FOX -CONFERENCE EXPENSESIREFERENCE BOOK-PARK 27.37 MAINTENANCE 23242 JOHN FRANE MARCH 92 EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 224.00 23243 LYNDELL FREY VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 500.00 23244 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 61.89 23245 THOMAS P GALLAGHER CITYS:SHARE ·OF ARBITRATION SERVICE 875.00 23246 JOSEPH GLEASON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.00 23247 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD WATER CUPS-FITNESS CENTER-COMMUNITY CENTER 57.60 23248 GLEN LAKE SALES & MARKETING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 30.00 23249 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY LADDERS-WATER DEPT 138.52 23250 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVIC TIRES/O-RINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1523.90 23251 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC FEBRUARY 92 SERVICE 5.00 23252 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN DUES-FINANCE DEPT 90.00 23253 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 244.00 23254 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC RECEPTACLE-COMMUNITY CENTER 14.35 23255 W W GRAINGER INC -SCREWDRlVERIMOTOR/IMPELLAR/CUT OFF WHEEL/ 37.4 -ROLLERSIBEARINGS/DEFLECTOR PLATE-FIRE DEPT/PARK MAINT/FACILITIES DEPT 23256 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 202.00 23257 THE HALE COMPANIES INC FUEL PUMP CARDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 178.76 23258 JIM HATCH SALES CO SCOOP SHOVELS-PARK MAINTENANCE 273.55 23259 ROZA HAUSER -REIMBURSEMENT-QUIT SMOKING PROGRAM-HUMAN 124.70 RESOURCES DEPT 23260 HEAVENLY HAM MEETING EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 105.00 23261 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 43.75 23262 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER JANUARY 92 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 1607.76 23263 HENN CTY-SHERIFFS DEPT FEBRUARY 92 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 452.58 23264 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 73.75 23265 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY TAX-RILEY LAKE PARK 772.50 23266 D C HEY COMPANY INC -COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS-FIRE DEPT/ 104.41 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23267 STEVE HIGLEY -SOFTBALLIVOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/ 405.00 FEES PAID 23268 HOFFERS INC PAINTIROLLER COVERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 154.21 23269 KERRY SETTEN HOFFSTROM EXPENSES-AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 38.59 23270 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC V-BELTSIVIBRATION ELIMINATOR-COMMUNITY CTR 72.91 23271 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC -PRINTING-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER-HUMAN 1692.41 RESOURCES DEPT 23272 HUD USER PUBLICATION-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 4.00 23273 HU'ITON CHEMICAL DE-GREASER/CAR WASH SOAP-EQUIPMENT MAINT 223.95 23274 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC ADAPTER/FLUORESCENT LIGHT TUBES-WATER DEPT iWo 23275 BRUCE ISAACS BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 23276 GARY ISAACS -VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS 5 . 0 COORDINATOR/FEES PArD 1691140 1~3 23211 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATORIHOSE REPAIRED-EQUIPMENT MAINT 625.03 23218 BRENDA JO JERDE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 900.00 23219 JERRYS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 25.89 23280 JOHNSON CONTROLS -1ST & 2ND QTR 92 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS/ 2142.93 • -INSTALLED POOL HEATER RELIEF VALVE- COMMUNITY CENTER 23281 E F JOHNSON CO CABLE LADDER-POLICE DEPT 544.08 23282 STEPHANIE JOHNSTON DOG LEASE CABLE-PARK MAINTENANCE 19.21 23283 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION 216.14 23284 JUSTUS LUMBER CO -FORMICA/CONTACT CEMENT/LUMBER-ANIMAL CTRL 121.62 DEPT /WATER DEPT 23285 ELYCE KASTIGAR -MILEAGE-AQUATICS/POOL SPECIAL EVENTS 140 .25 PROGRAM 23286 LEONARD J KOEHNEN· -ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR STUDY & DESIGN OF 1250.55· -RADIO COMMUNICATION TOWER & ANTENNA SYSTEM-POLICE DEPT 23281 MARY KO'ITKE BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 156.00 23288 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY -TAPEIMINI-FLASHLIGHTS/TAGS/TOWELSIDUST & 942.30 MIST RESPIRATORS/SAFETY CANS-WATER DEPT 23289 LAGESON -STARING LAKE LOGO-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 15.00 COMMISSION 23290 LAHASS CORPORATION DECAL KIT-SEWER DEPT 45.16 23291 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1403.48 23292 ROBERT LAMBERT -MARCH 92 MILEAGEIDUES-PARK & RECREATION 324.50 DEPT 23293 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD FEBRUARY 92 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 50.00 23294 CINDY LANENBERG COMPUTER SOFTWARE-FIRE DEPT 36.28 23295 LANGENWALTER CARPET DYEING -CARPET CLEANING-HOUSING REHABILITATION 141.50 PROGRAM 1 96 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & -FEBRUARY 92 LEGAL SERVICE-WETLAND PERMIT 5142.45 ISSUES 91 LAW ENFORCEMENT TV NETWORK APRIL 92 TV NETWORK SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 388.00 23298 HARRY LAWRENCE REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 25.32 23299 L M CIT LIABILITY INSURANCE 44849.66 23300 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC -JANUARY & FEBRUARY 92 SERVICE-FLYING 1681.01 CLOUD LANDFILL 23301 BILL LEMPESIS CONFERENCE AIRFARE EXPENSE-LIQUOR STORE 199.00 23302 LINHOFF CORPORATE COLOR FILM/FILM PROCESSING-PARK PLANNING DEPT 21.00 23303 LIQUID CARBONIC CHEMICALS-WATER DEPT 628.63 23304 LOGIS FEBRUARY 92 SERVICE 8406.11 23305 LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR INC ARM PINIPIN-PARK MAINTENANCE 7.08 23306 LOTUS SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 24.00 23307 JUDY LOWE -INTERPRETATIVE SERVICE-ADAPTIVE 100.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 23308 BRIAN & ALLISON LUEDTKE REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 161.88 23309 LUNDS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 48.50 23310 LYMAN LUMBER CO -PLYWOOD/STUDS/SIDING-PARK MAINT/ORGANIZED 425.18 ATHLETICS PROGRAM 23311 M C INDUSTRIES INC -IDENTIFICATION BRACELETS/Hl\RKERS-SPECIAL 256.59 TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 23312 M-V GAS CO PROPANE CYLINDERS-OUTDOOR CENTER 211.50 23313 MACGUEEN EQUIPMENT INC -ROLLER BEARINGS/GEAR OUTPUT SHAFT/GEAR/ 7004.61 -ADAPTERSIBRAKE SHOES/OIL/SHOE RUNNERS/ -DRIVE CHAINIBUMPER PADS/PULLEYS/SCREWSI -BRAKE LINK/GUTTER BROOMSIMAIN BROOMS/ .73316 -SWEEPER REFILL/CLAMPS/SPRINGS/SWEEPER REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23314 MARSHALL & SWIFT PUBLICATION-ASSESSING DEPT 10.00 23315 MASYS CORroRATION -APRIL 92 COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1282 6 AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 23316 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 329. 23317 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS -TYPESETTING-FLYER-YOUTH RECREATION 1370.00 PROGRAM/SUMMER COMMUNITY CENTER BROCHURE 23318 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 18.00 23319 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-CITY HALLIPOLICE DEPT 266.58 23320 AHMAD R MCGOWAN VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 78.00 23321 MCGRAW HILL INC BOOK-PARK PLANNING DEPT 72.70 23322 MCNEILUS STEEL INC -CHANNELIPIPE/ANGLES/STEEL PLATE-PARK 503.97 MAINTENANCE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23323 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 73.95 23324 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIPMENT CO OXYGEN CYLINDERS-FIRE DEPT 27.55 23325 MENARDS -PLYWOODITREATED TIMBERSIHINGESIBOLTS/ 451.60 -PULLS/SCREWS/OUTLETS/ANCHOR KITSlTooL -BOXIRAKESIPAINTIBRUSHESIROLLER COVERS/ -SAND "BELT/SAW BLADES/GRAVEL/STAPLES-PARK -MAINT/FACILITIES DEPT/STREET MAINT/SPRING SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 23326 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL COIL REPAIRIBOILER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 557.48 23327 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM APRIL 92 SEWER SERVICE 169118.00 23328 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS BULBS-CITY HALL 20.10 23329 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO HINGE PINS/SHEARS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 62.50 23330 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 1606.40 23331 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALLIPOLICE DEPT/ 1179.75 WATER DEPT 23332 MIDWEST RHINO LININGS INC -BEDLINERIRAIL SEALERITAILGATES & RACKS & 2758. -BUMPERS REPAIRED & LINED-STREET MAINT/ UTILITIES DIVISION 23333 MIDWESTERN MECH CORP REFUND-METER RETURNED & REPLACED 161.80 23334 MINNCOMM PAGING MARCH 92 PAGER SERVICE 35.50 23335 MN ASSN OF CEMETERY OFFICIALS DUES-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY 38.00 23336 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 500.60 23337 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT -FILM/PHOTO STRIPSIMATTE FOR REDUCTION OF 1042.51 -UTILITIES MAPS & ZONING MAPS-ENGINEERING DEPTIPLANNING DEPT 23338 MN CHAPTER IAAI DUES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 10.00 23339 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING/O-RINGSIVALVE 2370.23 -STEMS/FACE SHIELDSIHELMET HARDWARE/FOG -MACHINE & CARRYING CASE-$810/2 AIR MASK -CYLINDERS-$840-FIRE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER/ WATER DEPT 23340 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT CO PRESSURE WASHERIWANDIHOSES-WATER DEPT 2809.99 23341 MN FIRE AGENCIES PURCHASING DUES-FIRE DEPT 35.00 23342 MINNESOTA TROPHIES ENGRAVING-FIRE DEPT 11.60 23343 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 192.00 23344 MIl DISTRIBUTING CO -WASHERS/OIL SEALSIBEARING CONES/FILTERS/ 244.67 O-RINGS-PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 23345 MUNICILITE CO LIGHT BARS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 420.00 23346 NRPA PUBLICATIONS HANDBOOK-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 60.00 23347 JAN NELSON MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL 50.00 18776748 • APRIL 7.1992 23348 BETH NILSSON SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 4352.34 23349 NORDIC TRUCK PARTS INC BACK-UP ALARMS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 165.00 .0 JP NOREX INC -WATER MAIN REPAIRIHYDRANT REPAIR-WATER 1703.12 DEPT 23351 NORTH STAR DODGE CENTER INC 3/4 TON TRUCK WITH PLOW-WATER DEPT 15173.00 23352 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS INC STAINER/PVC HOSES-WATER DEPT 97.03 23353 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY -REPAIRED TRANSFORMER & EQUIPMENT DAMAGED 826.59 BY SNOW PLOW-STREET MAINTENANCE 23354 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS FACISIMILE PAPER/INK FILM-CITY HALL 87.49 23355 MICHAEL D NORMAN & ASSOCIATES INC SCHOOL-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 925.00 23356 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO LIGHT BULBS-FIRE DEPT 154.44 23357 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO -CITYS SHARE OF ADAPTIVE RECREATION SPRING 270.46 & SUMMER BROCURE 23358 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC -DRILL BIT/LOGGING SLINGlHooKS/ROLLER 102.92 -CHAIN-PARK MAINT/FORESTRY DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23359 P & T COMMUNICATION -INSTALLED MODEM LINES & PRINTER CABLE-362.72 WATER:DEPT 23360 PAPER WAREHOUSE TABLE COVERIPLATESINAPKINS-FIRE DEPT 18.20 23361 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY SEAT REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 150.00 23362 PEPPER OF MINNEAPOLIS MUSIC SHEETS-ART & MUSIC PROGRAM 57.16 23363 PEPSI GOLA COMPANY -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CTR/ 888.25 SOCIAL PROGRAMS 23364 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC -JANUARY 92 COMPARABLE WORTH STUDY-HUMAN 170.00 RESOURCES DEPT 23365 PITNEY BOWES INC -2ND QTR 92 POSTAGE METER RENTAL-POLICE 114.00 DEPT -~ POKORNY COMPANY REPAIR KIT-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 8.50 POWER BRAKE EGUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 79.47 68 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -REPLACED BALLAST(POLE SWITCH RECEPTACLE/ 94.15 WIRE NUTS-COMMUNITY CENTER 23369 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN OIL/CHAIN/SHARPENING-FIRE DEPT 125.90 23370 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING FORMS-ELECTIONS DEPT 99.70 23371 PRAIRIE VIEW FRAMING CO -RESERVE OFFICER RESIGNATION PLAQUE-POLICE 84.08 DEPT 23372 PRAIRIE VILLAGE PET HOSPITAL KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 18.24 23373 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER SERVICES -TAPE REPAIR/COMPUTER REPAIRIKEYBOARDI 500.00 PRINTER REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 23374 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC PHONE SWITCH HOOK REPAIRED-CITY HALL 80.00 23375 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC -REPLACED SPOUT & NOZZLEIHOIST CYLINDER 339.20 CHAIN REPLACED-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23376 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC -MARCH 92 WASTE DISPOSAL-FACILITIES DEPT/ 921.83 COMMUNITY CENTER 23377 R & R SPECIALTIES INC -ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED/OIL FILTER-74.50 COMMUNITY CENTER 23378 RADIATOR WAREHOUSE WEST GAS TANK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 129.95 23379 RADIO SHACK SWITCH/CABLE/ADAPTER/BATTERY-POLICE DEPT 31.59 23380 REAL GEM JEWELRY & AWARDS PLAQUES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 504.00 23381 MGE REFFSGMRD EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 15.00 23382 REGAL CLEANERS BLANKET CLEANED-POLl CE DEPT 5.00 23383 TED C REIN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 70.00 23384 RESPOND SYSTEMS SAFETY VESTS-STREET MAINTENANCE 144.33 23385 REVERE SILK PLANTS-WATER DEPT 96.71 .86 BARBARA RICE -SWIM INSTRUCTOR-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 30.00 PROGRAM 2906987 1~(P APRIL 7.1992 23387 RIPP RESTRAINTS INC RESTRAINING CUFFSIHOBBLES-POLICE DEPT 79.55 23388 RORY RISK JR VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 8. 23389 RITZ CAMERA -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-FIRE DEPT/FORESTRY 10 DEPT/OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS 23390 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES 00 -BASKET LEVELING SYSTEM REPAIRED/SANDER & 2470.24 VALVE-$1405-STREET DEPT 23391 RONS MUSIC & GAMES SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 468.10 23392 RYAN COMPANY INC REFUND-CONTRACTORS LICENSE 25.00 23393 S K WELL & PUMP INSPECTIONS WELL INSPECTION SERVICE-WATER DEPT 75.00 23394 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION -CARBURETOR CLEANER-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 185.75 CLEANING SUPPLIES-PARK MAINT 23395 SAFETY SHORT PRODUCTION INC SAFETY VIDEO-UTILITIES DIV 147.81 23396 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY 00 OFFICE SUPPLIES-KIDS KORNER PROGRAM 37.10 23397 CITY OF SAINT PAUL CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 195.00 23398 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC TICKET & OOUPON ROLLS-COMMUNITY CENTER 24.75 23399 SANCO INC -CLEANING SUPPLIESIVACUUM CLEANER BRUSH 179.08 SLEEVEIMOPS-COMMUNITY CTR/FACILITIES DEPT 23400 THE SANtwICH FACTORY INC EXPENSES-ANNIVERSARY PARTY-FIRE DEPT 218.33 23401 THE SANTA CRUZ OPERATIONS INC SOFTWARE HOTLINE SUPPORT-WATER DEPT 675.75 23402 CHUCK SCHAITBERGER CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 25.00 23403 JACK SCHEPERS CONFERENCE AIRFARE EXPENSES-LIQUOR STORE 199.00 23404 DALE SCHMIDT LICENSE RENEWAL-STREET MAINTENANCE 15.00 23405 KEVIN SCHMIEG -FEBRUARY & MARCH 92 EXPENSES-BUILDING 400.00 INSPECTIONS DEPT 23406 SCHMITT MUSIC CENTERS SHEET MUSIC-ART & MUSIC PROGRAM 74.00 23407 WI LEUR W SCHULTZ BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 52.50 23408 JOE SCHWARTZ -VOLLEYBALL INSTRUCTOR-AFTER SCHOOL 130.00 PROGRAM/FEES PAID 23409 RONALD SCHWARTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 31~ 23410 ALAN SHlLEPSKY CONSULTING INC SERVICE-COMPUTER SOFTWARE-STREET MAINT 318. 23411 MELISSA SHOCKLEY REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ANIMAL IMPOUND FEE 32.00 23412 SIGNA RAMA USA SIGNS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/SEWER DEPT 193.28 23413 STEVEN R SINELL MARCH 92 EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 250.44 23414 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER -LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPESINEWSLETTER CALENDARS-1197.00 -CITY HALL/SAFETY DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER/ SENIOR PROGRAMS 23415 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPTIUTILITIES DIV 1043.29 23416 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMM 2ND QTR 92 OPERATING BUDGET 4600.07 23417 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 93.60 23418 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-PLANNING DEPT 578.32 23419 MARY SPILLES -VOLLEYBALL INSTRUCTOR-AFTER SCHOOL 130.00 PROGRAM/FEES PAID 23420 SPORTS WORLD USA SOFTBALLS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM/ 41.00 WHISTLES-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER 23421 STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION-CITY HALLIPOLICE DEPT 140.40 23422 THE STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 86.53 23423 STATE SUPPLY COMPANY BALL VALVES-WATER DEPT 195.80 23424 VIC STEELE REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 132.65 23425 ED STEFFNER BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 408.00 23426 STERLING GROUP INC SERVICE-CPT PRE-ACQUISITION PHASE FEE 11875.00 23427 JOAN STRASBURG BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 162.50 23428 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ -STROBE TUBE/FLASHERS/LIGHT BARS/GRILLE & 1796.00 -DECK LIGHTS/2 BALLISTIC VESTIVEST OUTER -SHELLS/LIGHT BAR CONTROL UNITS-EQUIPMENT • MAINT/POLICE DEPT/SEWER DEPT 2945000 lq1 APRIL 7.1992 23429 STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC STORAGE CABINET-AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 200.00 23430 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -PIPEIVALVE/CABLE ASSEMBLIESIPUMPIMIRROR/ 449.27 • -CAPS/CONNECTOR/FILTERS/MAIN SHAFT/FUEL -TANK SUPPORTS/BRAKE LIGHT REPAIREDIDOOR -HINGES LUBRICATED-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ UTILITIES DIVISION 23431 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC WASTE DISPOSAL-OUTDOOR CENTER 76.74 23432 NATALIE SWAGGERT -FEBRUARY & MARCH 92 EXPENSES-HUMAN 410.00 RESOURCES DEPT 23433 DON SWENSON CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 25.00 23434 KATHERINE TEKIELA -CRAFT INSTRUCTOR-AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMI 468.00 SENIOR PROGRAM 23435 TENNANT COMPANY DOOR SKIRTS-PARK MAINTENANCE 19.90 23436 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING DEPT 379.37 23437 BETH GERSTEIN TIMM -EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR PROGRAMS/FEES 240.00 PAID 23438 TRAUT WELLS -2 WASH WATER RECOVERY PUMPS REPAIREDIWELL 10741.75 HEADS HAFT & BEARINGS REPAIRED-WATER DEPT 23439 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC -CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 120.13 " PROGRAM/AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 23440 CALEB TRUAX VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 75.00 23441 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO -OXYGEN/ACETYLENE/LIQUIFIED CARBON DIOXIDE-179.38 EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 23442 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVERY REFUND-IMPOUND FEE-POLICE DEPT 69.23 23443 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 60.21 23444 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 2239.39 23445 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -BUSHINGS IRING TERMINALS/DRILL BITSI 730.65 .~ FITTINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE IVARS G UPENS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 60.00 VALERIES FRESH FLOWERS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 109.50 23448 TRIA VIKESLAND -SHRINE CIRCUS TICKETS-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 26.00 PROGRAM 23449 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER 416.90 23450 VISION ENERGY PROPANE CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 261.44 23451 WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY 5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL METERS-WATER DEPT 341.00 23452 WATERITE INC -VALVES/COMPRESSION FITTINGS/BUSHINGSI 240.50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 23453 WELCH VILLAGE LIFT TICKETS-SKI TRIP PROGRAM/FEES PAID 696.00 23454 RAY N WELTER HTG REFUND-OVERPAYMENT HEATING PERMIT 15.00 23455 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE/EXPENSES-SENIOR PROGRAMS 120.97 23456 BRIAN WIPPERMANN GUN RANGE GUN RANGE RENTAL-POLICE DEPT 1860.00 23457 X-ERGON WELDING RODSILENSE/COVER PLATE-WATER DEPT 205.03 23458 YALE INC FILTERS-WATER DEPT 144.20 23459 TRACEY ZACHMAN SCHOOL-FINANCE DEPT 240.25 23460 ZACKS INC PICK AXE HANDLES/DRAIN SPADES-SEWER DEPT 97.65 23461 JIM ZAIC EXPENSES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 15.00 23462 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -1ST AID SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCEI 258.00 COMMUNITY CENTERIUTILITIES DIVISION 23463 EARL ZENT EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 6.00 23464 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC RUST PROTECTION-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 250.00 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENTS 330515.72 11000 NORWEST BANK MN NA BOND PAYMENTS 27998.75 .3619~ $1303628.98 ')L\~ DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 12 CERTIFICATE DEBT FD 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 20 CEMETERY OPERATIONS 21 POLICE DRUG FORFEITURE 43 77 FIRE DEBT FUND 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 45 UTILITY DEBT FD ARB 62 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 73 WATER FUND 77 SEWER FUND 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 87 CDBG FUND 90 TAX INCREMENT FUND $1303628.98 554909.01 4874.63 330225.00 36916.59 31349.18 38.00 395.00 10622.50 17376.25 290.72 12949.75 76621.99 224016.57 296.10 151.50 2596.19 • • • • • • Fairfield 1992 Amendment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 5-92-PUD-2-92 AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTIlER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the RI-9.5 District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 2-92-Rl-9.5 District (hereinafter PUD 2-92-RI-9.5). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of March 18, 1992, entered into between Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") PUD and is hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD 2-92-RI-9.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD 2-92-RI-9.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters II and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD 2-92-RI-9.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD 2-92-Rl-9.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the RI-9.5 District and shall be included hereafter in the PUD 2-92-Rl-9.5 District and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 24th day of February, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of April, 1992. ATTEST: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day 0( _____ , 1992. • • • • • • Exhibit A Legal Description Those JRrts of Outlots C, D and H, FAIRFIELD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 2.'lD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as folIO"-"S: CoiJmE:>..ncing at the southwest corner of Outlot C, FAIRFIELD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 2t-.'D ADDITION, thence "along the northwesterly lines of said Outlot C and. OuLlot 0, FAIRFIELD OF EDEN PRAIRTE 2ND ADDITION, North 43 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East, assumed bearing, 1076.22 feet to the point of beginning of land to be described; thence continuing a.long said northwesterly lines of said Outlot C and Outlot D, FAIRFIELD OF EDEN FRAIRIE 2ND ADDITION, North 43 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East, 1617.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 37 minut.es 34 seconds East, 318.91 feet; thence South 1 degree 25 "minutes 32 seconds West, 140.11 feet; thence southwesterly 268.10 feet alOng a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, said curve has a radius of 395.62 feet and a central angle of 38 degrees 49 min~tes 39 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 15 minutes 11 seconds West, tangent to the la.">t descr.ibed curve, 313.55 feet; thence southerly 449.82 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the east, said curve has a radius of 347.36 feet and a central angle of 74 degrees 11 uri"nutes 43 seconds; thence South 33 degrees 56 minutes 33 seconds East, tangent to the last curve, 56.30 feet; thence southeasterly 287.75 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, said curve has a radius of 1506.6S feet arrl a central angle of 10 degrees 56 minutes 33 seconds; thence South 78 degrees West, not tangent to the last described curve, 16.88 feet; thence Westerly 262.16 feet a.long a tangential curve, concave to the north, said curve has a radius of 592.92 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds; thence North 76 degrees 40 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, 127.93 feet; thence Westerly 288.77 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, said curve has a rndius of 640.46 feet an a central angle of 25 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 77 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, 230.23 feet; thence northwesterly, 274.14 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, said curve has a radius of 281.07 feet and a central ~le of 55 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds; thence North 46 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, 150.00 feet to the point of bc~ginning. Fairfield 1992 Amendment SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEl\1ENT TO AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of April 7, 1992, by CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Developer's Agreement between Centex Real Estate Corporation and the City of Eden Prairie for Fairfield Phases 2-6, dated February 6, 1990, (hereinafter the "Developer's Agreement) for that portion of the property designated on Exhibit B as "the Amended Area"; NO\V, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #5-92-PUD-2-92, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of the Amended Area as follows: 1. "Developer shall develop the Amended Area of the property in conformance with the materials revised and dated February 6, 1990, reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 15, 1988, and in conformance with the materials revised and dated March 18, 1992, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 7, 1992, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided. herein. 2. Concurrent with the construction of Scenic Heights Road and prior to issuance by City of any building permit for any lots abutting Scenic Heights Road within the Amended Area, Developer agrees to implement the Berm Planting Plan as depicted in Exhibit B,. attached hereto. Said Planting Plan, located along the south side of Scenic Heights Road, includes construction of a berm and planting of coniferous and deciduous trees. Developer agrees to provide a security in the amount of 150 % of the cost of construction and implementation of all such plantings in accordance with the Landscape and Screening requirements of City Code. 3. Concurrent with street and utility construction within the Amended Area, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, sidewalks and trails in the following locations: A. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Braxton Drive. B. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Shepherd Way. • • Developer agrees to construct said sidewalks and trail in accordance with the • • • • 4. terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto . Developer agrees to provide for a Notice of Conditions to be signed for acknowledgement purposes by all future owners or transferees of lots within the Amended Area. Said Notice shall inform future owners or transferees of the location of future Scenic Heights Road and future Highway #212. 5. City hereby grants the following waiver to City Code requirements within the Rl- 9.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Amended Area of the property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD 2- 92: Waiver from required lot depth abutting a railroad from 150 ft. to allow 130 ft. for Lots 14 -19, Block 1, as d~picted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 6. Developer agrees to all and reaffirms all of the terms and conditions and accepts the obligations of "Developer" under the Developer's Agreement, except as inconsistent with or amended by this Supplement. Fairfield 1992 Amendment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. S-92-PUD-2-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN THE OFFICE DISTRICT AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance amends the zoning from the RI-9.5 District and places it within the PUD-2-RI-9.5 District for land located north of Candlewood Parkway, west of Braxton Drive subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane, City Clerk /sl Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of 1992. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) • • • • • Fairfield 1992 Amendment CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-29 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. S-92-PUD-2-92 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5-92-PUD-2-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 5-92-PUD-2-92, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council fmds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 5-92-PUD-2-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within twenty days after said publication. ADOPfED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: April 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Fairfield of Eden Prairie 9th Addition PROPOSAL: Centex Real Estate Corporatiot:l is requesting City Council approval of the final plat of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 9th Addition. Located south and east of the abandoned Chicago and Northwestern Railroad, south of the proposed extension of Scenic Heights Road, and north of Candlewood Parkway, the plat contains 21.8 acres to be divided into 39 single family lots, one outlot, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlot A contains 10.3 acres and will be subdivided into single family lots as part of the Fairfield of Eden Prairie 10th Addition, also before the City Council on this agenda. This proposal is part of a requested amendment to the Fairfield PUD to change from "cluster lots" to single family Rl-9.5 lots. HISTORY: The PUD Amendment, Zoning District Amendment, Planned Unit Development District Review, Preliminary Plat, and Developer's Agreement are all scheduled for City Council approval at the meeting to be held April 7, 1992. VARIANCES: All variances not originally granted through the PUD District Review will be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities, roadways and walkways will be installed throughout this property in conformance with City Code and the requirements of the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 9th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: JJ:ssa l. 2. 3. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $478. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $4,482. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,560. cc: Dan Blake, Centex Real Estate Sathre Bergquist 151 e e·· e • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-57 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FAIRFIELD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 9TH ADDmON WHEREAS, the plat of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 9th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minriesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Fairfield of Eden Prairie 9th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 2, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City EngineerC1lAJ FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: April 2, 1992. SUBJECT: Fairfield of Eden Prairie 10th Addition PROPOSAL: Centex Real Estate Corporation has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 10th Addition. Located along the western perimeter of the Fairfield PUD, the plat contains 10.3 acres to be divided into 32 single family lots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. This proposal is a subdivision of Outlot A of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 9th Addition, also before the City Council at their April . 7, 1992 meeting. HISTORY: The preliminary plat, Zoning District Change, and Developer's Agreement are all scheduled for City Council approval April 7, 1992. V ARIANC.ES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals . UTILITI.ES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and streets, roadways, and walkways will be installed throughout this project in conformance with the requirements of City Code and the Developer's Agreement. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 10th Addition, subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $304. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $3,456. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $1,280. JJ:ssa cc: Dan Blake, Centex Real Estate Sathre Bergquist • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-58 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FAIRFIELD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 10TH ADDmON WHEREAS, the plat of Fairfield of Eden Prairie 10th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minn~ta and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie . . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: ·A. Plat approval request for Fairfield of Eden Prairie 10th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 2, 1992. B. C. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 7, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk 1(P6 • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Carl J. Jullie, City ManagerC:; DATE: April 2, 1992 SUBJECT: 1992 Goals for city Manager My January.17, 1992 memo to the City Council listed ten goals which would become the new basis for my next performance review. Following is an update on progress toward these goals and some elaboration of specific objectives: 1. Facilitate and promote ongoing total quality management activities within the city departments. 2. 3. Progress: Please refer to the attached summary memo of March 19, 1992. In addition, staff work in the area of employee safety continues to win awards and sUbstantial rebates on our insurance premiums. Also a new employee safety incentive program is off to a very good start. Facilitate and promote ongoing strategic planning with the City council and Staff leading to an updated mission statement and supporting value statements. Progress: Our next workshop session is scheduled for Monday, April 27. Attached is a copy of our current mission statement and supporting goals. As our Council/Staff workshops continue, we will need to review and amend, as appropriate, the overall mission and goals statement. The recent strong approval of the park bond referendum and many positive comments from the public regarding the CPT building purchase, indicates that our fiscal planning for capital needs has been effective and well-received by the citizens. Develop a policy manual listing the major policies which the Council approves and staff implements; distinguish between Council's role to review and approve policy and staff's role to prepare and administer implementation procedures. Progress: We plan to dedicate one Council/ Staff workshop to review the policies applicable to each departmental function. So far the Assessing Department and its functions/policies have been addressed. An outcome is the Council's appointment of a citizen board to do the valuation appeals for this year. Next on the list -is the Planning Department and our development review process. 1(P i Mayor and city council April 2, 1992 Page Two 4. Develop ways to monitor and measure performance of each city department. Progress: Part of the total quality management process is to develop ways to track data and measure changes therein, which will be an indication of the effectiveness of the total quality management approach. For example, some things we can (and do) measure are • citizen response to follow-up survey cards sent by the Police Department • Length of time "it takes to process building permits • Accidents and injury data for City employees • Annual survey of developers • Assessing Department -sales ratio studies • Biannual citizen/business survey • • Issues raised/resolved in annual audit report • • Community Center attendance/fees/satisfaction surveys other methods to measure performance in each department will be pursued through both TQM and the upcoming 1993 City Budget process. s. Development ways to enhance and promote a positive image for the city of Eden prairie. Progress: We are working with a committee of the Eden Prairie Chamber and School District officials to prepare a new community brochure which will highlight the many positive aspects of the City. Production of a promotional video is also on our agenda. We have begun an outreach program to visit with the top businesses in Eden Prairie to see what their needs and expectations are and how we can better serve them. Each City department has been encouraged to pursue appropriate awards and recognition which will bring attention to our programs. For example, Officer Curt Oberlander recently won Honorable Mention in the Police Officer of the Year competition. Some other positive events so far this year • include the Martin Luther King, Jr. event at City" Hall, the Rotary Club's Jerry Burns' Day Celebration, and the Community Center Ten-Year Anniversary celebration. • • • Mayor and City council April 2, 1992 Page Three 6. Assume a more active and visible leadership role. 7. Progress: I have taken more opportunities to appear and participate in events outside of City Hall. For example, I am participating in the Leadership Exchange Program with the Chamber and School District, Jerry Burns' Day Celebration, the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Celebration, the community Center's Anniversary Celebration, and several other "open house" types of events. I continue to represent the City as Chairman of both the Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee and the Cable TV Commission operating Committee. I spoke at the Fire Department's 25th Year Anniversary Celebration and to several groups regarding the Park Bond Referendum. I am participating in the Chamber's membership drive and I have been meeting with business people to determine their needs. I have been very active in the work of directing staff and consultants during the CPT building purchase process. I also presented a lecture to a graduate class at the Uni versi ty of st. Thomas School of Business. Most of my days are almost fully consumed with meetings and discussions with people relating to Eden Prairie issues. Pursue additional continuing education and interpersonal skills training. Progress: I have attended the following in the areas of continuing education - • "Customer Focus" business seminar presented by Mr. Howard Hyden • An SLUC business seminar titled "Government: Treating the Citizenry as customers" • An SLUC business seminar reviewing pending legislation at the current legislative session • A forum presented by the Metropolitan Council discussing development forecast for the region • "Quality Services from city Hall" seminar and other sessions at the National League of cities Annual Conference • Seminar at the University of Minnesota titled "Reinventing Government Services", featuring author and consultant Ted Gabler • Also I am enrolled in a Dale carnegie class on "Effective Presentations, Video Productions, and News Media Interviews" Mayor and city council April 2, 1992 Page Four 8. Develop an updated financial plan for the City, including budgeting goals. progress: By mid-year I plan to have a report indicating an update of our Capital Improvement Program, and a three-year financial projection with property tax implications. Our primary budgeting goal continues to require that our spending not be in excess of the rate of inflation and new growth. Efficiency and cost-saving ideas are an integral part of the total quality management process, including our budgeting program for 1993. The public is indeed demanding to see good value for their tax dollars. spent and a stop of escalating costs from all sections of their government. This is our primary challenge for the 1990s. '9. Resolve city Hall acquisition and provide for a smooth transition to new City offices. Progress: The purchase price we negotiated for the CPT building is a great bargain. C.H. Robinson Company has now waived their rights to purchase the building and we • are continuing to talk with them about some concerns they • have relating to Police, Fire, and School uses of the building. I am confident we can work these out and meet our June 30 closing date. Staff and Brian Cluts are proceeding nicely with our space planning. Everything seems well on track. 10. Aggressively promote voter approval of the 1992 Park Bond Ref~rendum. Progress: City staff, especially Bob Lambert and the Parks Department staff, plus the citizen committee and Ci ty councilmembers, all did a wonderful job in achieving approval of the Park Bond Referendum. The large margin of victory is a tribute to our determination and team work. I believe this victory sets a new, positive tone for the city. CJJ: jdp Attachments • .. \ • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Dawson Carl Jullie Natalie Swaggert Tom Buchner 19, March 1992 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PROGRESS SUMMARY -QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TEAMS I. What we've achieved to date: a.) Teams focused on key quality-related issues. The three new committees are tackling important need areas -important to the city management and to customer service improvement. Although the magnitude of these projects is a challenge to the teams, they are "foundation issues," and promise extensive impact throughout the organization. • Phone committee -Direct impact on employees (internal customers) and external customers. If recommendations are implemented, customers will take immediate notice. Although a new phone system is expensive, a short payback is possible through reduced internal waste and improved customer satisfaction. • Technology committee -Also promises benefits to internal and external customers. Well integrated systems will improve coordination, reduce waste and ineffectiveness and project an improved image to the council. Customers will receive better information more quickly. • Recognition/Communication committee -Primarily focused on employee's needs, this committee is addressing fundamentals of a high quality environment. Improved communication, information flow and recognition will encourage and support employees to take more satisfaction from their work and provide improved services to customers. • Sara Title III and Safety committees -Both were established before our current efforts and are doing well. Through cross membership and training opportunities, they are benefitting indirectly and may be able to improve their effectiveness. b.) Beginning of cultural change. Through the committees, leaders and members are seeing/feeling increased involvement. They are experiencing management "letting go" of high priority tasks and testing out their abilities to contribute through the team approach. They are catching initial glimpses of the work involved and the significant level of impact they can have. . " Other areas of change include: • • Leaders and members are developing group skills and problem-solving skills. • Participant's morale levels may be increasing. • Increased sense of urgency among committee members. c.) Framework established for team/committee efforts. Leaders, members and managers have worked out many of the team startup and management issues that will help future teams launch themselves successfully. The model that has emerged includes clear roles, member selection and team size, project definition and action planning guidelines. Management has identified several keys to the success of teams at Eden Prairie, such as clear project expectations, appropriate pace, and time commitment levels. There is better understanding of what teams require and how many teams can be supported simultaneously. Management liaisons have provided effective levels of support and interest in what the teams are doing without unwanted influence. Basic support materials have been developed including the leader's handbook and key forms such as the team charter, action plan, and meeting agenda. II. What is yet to be achieved: a.) Visibility and promotion. Because the current teams are engaged in very important projects, their efforts should be stressed to council members and city residents. Internally, there may be room to improve communication about these teams to other employees. b.) Comprehensive documentation. At the team level, they are finding their way (e.g., action plan, etc.), yet a clearer set of documentation requirements is needed. At the program level, less progress has been made. A documentation plan is needed that connects the need for quality improvement to team activities and finally to results generated. There may be need for cost/benefit documentation. c.) Operation or process level teams. The current committees are working on organization -wide issues of more the "opportunity exploration" type. Other opportunities exist for improving specific service processes or solving problems using short term, operations-level teams. The development review team would have been in this category, but even it would have been relatively large scope. Eden Prairie can benefit by identifying some "low hanging fruit" as targets for short term teams. d.) Continued training. We've avoided a common problem: dumping on too much training early before teams can get their feet wet. The leader training was valuable in that it addressed urgent, common concerns, yet it only went so far and additional training sessions for that group may be desirable. To help team members, a brief member handbook may be needed. .. ~ III. Steering committee needs: I consider the steering committees greatest need to be for a stronger sense of purpose in guiding the quality improvement effort. In particular: e e· e • • • • Identifying processes within the organization where quality improvement efforts are needed, relating those needs to strategic plans, and providing initial targets or benchmarks for service quality levels. • Organization-wide service level goal setting and measurement. • Redefining TOM for Eden Prairie IV. The future of TOM at Eden Prairie: Building on much of what I've already written, I suggest the following points of emphasis: • Increasing awareness and understanding of customer expectations. • Measuring key service performance levels. • Using teams and individual initiative to improve quality performance through system redesign/continuous improvement. • Building communication: up, down, and laterally. • Continuing training efforts beginning with customer service . 1~1 ·.":. ,,:,. N~~··.·~f·(SO!i~it~~·~.:·_·······.;...<'·_·······.;...· <:.;... ••.. .;... •.. ~~...;....;..~...;....;.....;..;,.;........-.,...;,..;-...;..;,.;....-_------______ _ ....... " ... " ... .... .. . .:: .. ' <:-.. :.::-.: ... ' ....... ; ...... :-:-> ..... : ............ . ..•... ~.<..;.iaidHe ••• • ••• r ••••.•••••••••. •.· •.•.••.••. · .••.....•.••.••.••.••.•..•••..•..••••..••.••••.••. iii ............ .. ......... . ......... ...... ........................................ ... (.. ..................................... . ~ ..........•.•.•.•.•.•.•.....•.•••••••••.•.••.•.. > .•••. ····················>··»~iiji~D.l#ni···t.,iatson:_·· ________ _ : >.";-<::::.> ... ':<::-::}::::::::::.:: .... ::::.:::::::::::»?~:::::.::: ::;:;::;:;:;':;:;:.> .. .;." Goa1:. ________________________________ ___ Tasks/Projects (Describe): ----------------------e List Methods and Timeframe: ______________________ _ Describe any work required by members outside of regular committee meet - ings. If certain tasks will be assigned to members, list the task and the member to whom it will be assigned. ---e pb/qm-comm.wrkplnform • City of Eden Prairie MISSION STATEMENT We are committed to the growth of Eden Prairie as a city of unique character where people can live. work. shop. and play. and where planning for the future and delivery of public services contributes to a high -quality of life for all and a strong sense of community based on ·Pritfe tlirougli 'E~d£ence .• • • ( MOnD: J ~ ______ p_~_e_qn __ ~_o_ug_n_~_~_c_e_{u_m __ e ____ _ GOAL STATEMENTS PARKS AND OPEN SPACES Goal: To have a well planned. abundant system of parks and open spaces which is safe and accessible by trails. Natural amenities should be preserved. Outdoor uses should be diverse to appeal to the broadest range of people. and there should be on-going evaluation ofthe changing needs for active and passive uses. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Goal: To plan. encourage and support. responsible. timely development which integrates a range of housing options. commerCial/industrial land uses and parks and open spaces. "DOWNTOWN" Goal: To develop a special downtown center that will provide an active. bustling. central gathering point that is pedestrian friendly. accessible to the entire community. and lend a small-town feeling and opportunity for tradition. TRANSPORTATION Goal: Develop an integrated transportation system embodying highways. transit (including buses. Rideshare. LRT). and trail systems. all providing internal circulation and access to and from the City of Eden Prairie. PUBLIC SAFETY Goal: To continue to have Eden Prairie known as a safe place to live. work. and play. PUBLIC SERVICES Goal: To ensure that essential and deSired services are provided at an acceptable cost which lead toward a high-quality of life for all. pb:misslon statement/goals 3/92 Il}1 • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager DATE: April 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Guidelines tor Choosing Boards/Commission Members The attached memo from Ms. Provo outlines the results of our inquiries of other cities regarding their guidelines, etc. The Council may wish to review and discuss these following general guidelines and qualifications for the selection process: 1) Residency - 6 months (if contested probably would not stand legally); 2) Education/Training/Experience/special Expertise - applicants should have something special along these lines; 3) Some record of prior involvement in community affairs, could be service clubs, fraternal organizations, neighborhood associations, etc.; 4) Good interpersonal skills; 5) Able to maintain at least 75% attendance record; and 6) Require that an application form be submitted answering specific questions, such as that used by the city of Plymouth. CJJ:jdp Attachments 1,0 MEMORANDUM TO: Carl J. Jullie FROM: Joyce Provo DATE: March 23, 1992 SUBJECT: Guidelines/Requirements for Applicants for Boards/commissions As requested by the City Council, I have called the following cities inquiring if they have certain requirements residents have to meet before being appointed to a board/commission.-· Results are as follows: Golden Valley Minnetonka Chanhassen Richfield Plymouth No guidelines (sent a copy of their application form, questions asked at interviews, and a synopsis of duties of each board/commissions) No guidelines (sent a copy of their application, and synopsis of duties of each board/commission) No guidelines No guidelines No guidelines (sent a copy of their application form, and information sheet sent to applicants) A couple of the cities I spoke with said they had tried asking for certain qualifications but found they did not work. If you would like me to check with other cities, I would be happy to do so. JDP Attachments 1// • • • \,11 Y VI \:JUIUt::11 vUlicry 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden VOlley, MN 55427 e __ _ City Council Advisory Boards and Commissions Council Advisory Boards and Commissions recommend policy to the City COWlcil and advise the Council on a variety of diverse issues. Advisory Boards and Commissions are st.1ffed by citizen volunteers interested in serving their community. Delow is a list of Golden Valley's Boards and Comnllssions. If one interests you, contact Judy Nally at 593-8006. She can give you more information and send you an application. You must be a resident of Golden Valley to apply. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Hear.; requests for variances from the city code (zoning). Meets monthly, second Tuesday, 7:30 pill. Members: five Building Board of Review (BBR) Advises, recommends, and assists Council and administrative officers ofthe City in matters relating to the building codes and issuam:tl ufbuilding pennits. Meets monthly, first and third Monday::;, S pm. Membelx· up to six • Civil Service Commission (CSC) Has absolute control and supervision over the employment, promotion, discharge, and suspension of police officers of the Public Safety Dep.trtrm,:Ill. Meets annually and on call. e M~mbers: three Human Rights Commission (HRC) Advises, recommends. and assists Council in matters of equal opportunity and elimination ofunf. .. ir discriminatory practices. Meets mOllthly, second Thursday, 7:30 pm. Memb(~rs: up to 12 Open Space and Recreation Commission (OS8cRC) Advises, recommends, and assists Council in policies and plans relating to open space needs, parks and recreation programs, tmil systems, and Brookview Qolf Course. Meets Inonthly, fourth Monday, 7 pm. Members: up to nine Planning Commission (PC) Advises, recommends, and assists Council in matters relating to planning and growth of the City, includ· IIlg matters relating to the SOCial, economiC, and physical environml:lIl. Mc::els monthly, second and fourth Mondays, 7 pm. Membas: up to seven ~ity of Golden Valley 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 • City Council Advisory Boards and Commissions Application Name .. ~ ______ . ___ .. __ . __ Address ._--------_ .. _._._.-Zip, ____ _ Number of years (months) resident of Golden Valley __ _ Employer" ___ _ --------_ .. " .•.. _._-_ ...• _----- Address ____ _ _________ City __________ _ Zip __ ... _-. Wurk Phone Iloes your wurk require you to travel? (check one) .~_ a great deal __ periodically __ very little ~_ not at all • no yflll have any special interests or training that you think 9 partle',lar Board or Commission ('ould use? (uu separate sheet if Mcessary) .----.---_ ..... -... _---_.----------------- ._-_ .•.• --- .--------_." .. -._._ ...... . _-----_ .• ". -_ ... _------ .----.. -.... -.. -' ---_ .. _-_ ..... __ . __ ._--------_ ...... _._ .. Please number your choices according to preference: __ Board of Zoning Appeals _ Human Rights Commission . __ Building Board of Review Civil Service Commission _ Open Space & Recreation Commission ____ Planning Commission • Signature Date 1 ----,-_ ......... _--_. • • • BOARD/COMMISSION INTERVIEW Name Date -------------------------------------------------- 1. Why are you interested in serving? 2. What particular skills, expertise, interest do you bring? 3. Impressions of Golden Valley: Positive? Negative? 4. Other comments: Explain Board/Commission role in Plan B. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------~~-- RATING Knowledge of Community Involvement with Community (through clubs. schools, churches. etc.) Ability to present information orally Flexible and open to varying perspect1ves Knowledge BZA BBR esc of issues/information 123 4 1 Z 3 4 1 2 3 4 assigned 5 5 5 to Commission: HRC 1 OSRC 1 PC 1 Overa 11 Impression 1 ? ~ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 2 2 (Circle One) least most 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 • • November, 1991 ·Dear Resident: Thank you for your ~nCl';1iry regarding serving on the City's advisoJ..y boards, COIrWll.SSl.Cns, or cO~'r.itte€s. Please complete and return the enclosed Background Information Form. Presently, the following groups serve as advisors to the City ·council: Planning Commission Board of Zoning Adjustment Economic Development Authority Charter Commission Police Civil Service Commission Senior citizens Advisory Board Park Board In addition, from time to time, the Mayor appoints committees to advise on specific issues. ad hoc When an opening becomes available, the information you provide will be reviewed by the City Council. You will be advised if you are being considered for an appointment and the Council's action regarding the appointment. Again, thank you for your willingness to serve our comm~nity. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. TMB/d encl • 11S the city offices are located at 14600 minnetonka boulevard minnetonka, minnesota 55345-1597 office: (612)-939-8200 fax: (612)-939-8244 PLANNING COMMISSION Comprised of 7 members. Duties include assisting and advising • the City Council in administration of the City Zoning Ordinance; conauct public hearings on matters as required by provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision and Platting Ordinance and any other matters referred by the Councilor by ordinance. Following the public hearings required, the Planning Commission shall make its report and recommendation to the City Council and city Manager. Meetings are held at 6:30 p.m. the first and third Thursday of each month. BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT Comprised of 7 members. The Board hears requests and decides appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determi.nation made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of this ordinance; hears requests for .variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, grants such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Meetings are the 2nd Thursday of each month at 6:30 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY comprised of 5 members .. Advises the City council regarding • economic development, housing and redevelopment matters, exercises certain powers as authorized by the City council, assumes powers and duties and obligations heretofore held by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the city. Meetings are held on the 1st Tuesday of each month at 6 p.m. CHARTER COMMISSION Comprised of 15 members. primary responsibility for reviewing and recommending any amendments to the City Charter. Objectives include simplifying language, eliminating outdated provisions, conforming the Charter to recent state laws and analyzing whether there could be improvements to the existing city structure and operation. Meets on the 2nd Thursday of every month, 7 p.m. POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Consists of 3 members. Commission has control and supervJ.sJ.on over the employment, promotion, discharge and suspension of all officers of Minnetonka's Police Department. Meetings are called whenever necessary. • • • • SENIOR CITIZEN ADVISORY BOARD Comprised of 16 members. Duties include advising city council as to needs and status of seniors in the city, recommends ways in which those needs may be met; determine and assess existing resources in the city which may be utilized by seniors to meet their needs; evaluate and assess proposed programs, grants and other governmental activities which may impact seniors; recommend policies, goals and objectives for operation of the Senior Center, and working with staff and Senior Coordinator. Meets 2nd Tuesday of each month at 10 a.m. PARK BOARD Comprised of 6 members. Consults with City Council and staff in matters relating to parkland, park facilities, programs and finances. Includes long and short range planning related to capital improvement projects, a"cquisition, development and use of parklands, park facilities, recreational and leisure time facilities and recreational programs. Members also represent the city on a Joint Recreation Board, directing primary attention to the recreation programs and activities developed and offered through the Joint Board; makes recommendations to the City Council through the Joint Board concerning policies pertaining to recreational programs and activities. Meets 1st Wednesday of each month at 7 p.m. , CITY OF ~A BACKGROUND INFORMATION FORM Thank. you nOlL yOUIL -i.ntVl.~.t -i.n .6Vl.v-i.ng on. .the ( ,. nOlL .the CU;y 0 n l*i,tlt~~Q-Jtl"'T"k-a.-. ---:;t ..... n.-o"'"'"'lL ..... aT'"e":-1L ..,.th.,...a:t-r--.th""'e--rMayr--olL-an~d-:C""o-W1.-cam~-e-mbeJt.4 have a be:ttVl. u.nd.eJt.4.tandi.n.g 0 n yOUIL backglLOun.d and -i.~u, plea.6e plLOv-i.de .the noUow.i.ng -i.n.nolL- mCLtion: NAME DATE HOME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED IN ~? -------------------- BUSINESS NAME TITLE BUSINESS ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ---------------------------------------------------------------- EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND: PRIOR EXPERIENCE ON CITY BOARDS,. COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS AND/OR BACKGROUND THAT MAY BE HELPFUL TO YOU IN THE AREA YOU HAVE INDI- CATED AN INTEREST IN: CIVIC GROUPS, ETC. MEMBERSHIPS: Thank. you nOlL pJtOv-i.di.n.g thi.6 -i.n.nOILma.:Uon.. 110 • • • ....... ... .-, .. " • • • Application received by City on: Commission(s) Applied for: 1st Choice: 2nd Choice: CITY OF PLYMOUTH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OR COMMISSION Personal Information Name: Home Phone: ----------------------------------- Home Address: Lived in Plymouth Since: Property Owned in Plymouth (other than residence): Occupation Present Employer: Work Phone: ------------------------ Position Title: Education Zip Code Course Work Taken Beyond High School Institution To/From Degree/Credits Area of Emphasis Civic Experience List other civic experience you have had including name of organization, dates of participation, name of city, position held and accomplishments: Opinion Questions What do you believe you could contribute to the community if appointed to a City Board or Commission? How do you believe you would benefit if appointed to a Board or Commission? As a Board or Commission member, what issue(s) might cause conflict between civic responsibility and personal/professional interests? I would be available for Board/Commission meetings on the following evenings (circle): Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Signed: Date: The selection process will vary according to the number of applicants and openings and may not include interviews with all candidates. Please return completed application to: City Clerk City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 Thank you! ~o • • • • • • 3/91 INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS TO PLYMOUTH'S ADVISORY COMMISSIONS Background Information Plymouth City Ordinance provides for the creation of advisory commissions including Planning, Park and Recreation, and Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The purpose of each advisory commission is to provide input to the City Council from concerned residents regarding specific issue areas addressed by each commission. Membership on a commission is voluntary and appointments are made by the City Council for two or three .year terms. Council procedure for filling commission positions generally consists of a review of applications, Council interview of prospective commissioners and selection of successful applicants. This handout is designed to provide you with summary information regarding each of the commissions and information about what you can expect as a commissioner on a Plymouth advisory commission. In General Volunteer commissioners invest a substantial amount of time (anywhere from 10 to 40 hours per month) to commission related activities. In many cases, commissions have subcommittees selected to deal with specific issues which occasionally arise. Commissions meet once, and in some cases, twice per month. Work sessions may be scheduled periodically. Prior to the regularly scheduled meeting, commissioners receive an agenda packet which contains staff reports and substantial background information briefing the commissioners about petitions, applications, etc., to be considered at the meeting. staff reports are often quite detailed; two or more hours will be required to review an agenda packet to become fully familiar with agenda items. Commissioners are expected to maintain regular attendance at the monthly meetings, participate in the formal meeting, physically review sites, when appropriate, and render decisions based upon the overall good to the community as opposed to more parochial interests. Periodic self evaluations regarding attendance and performance are completed by each commission member for the chairperson of the commission and subsequent review by the City Council. Commissioners recognize that their respective commissions are advisory and do not have policy-making power. The City Council will give thorough consideration to commission recommendations in dealing with subject matter coming before it. Data About Plymouth Advisory Commissions I. PLANNING COMMISSION A. Regularly meets: 7:00 p.m., second and fourth Wednesdays of each month. · .. B. Purpose: The Planning Commission is established under the ~ provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Planning Act. As such, it is responsible for reviewing requests and applications by petitioners to ensure that such petitions conform with the City's land use regulations and Comprehensive Plan. C. Membership: The Planning Commission consists of seven members, four of whom are appointed from four districts within the City. The four districts are shown on the attached map. Three members of the commission are appointed from the City at large. Members of the commission are appointed by the Council for staggered three year terms expiring January 31 of each year. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson are appointed by the commission from among members of the commission for a term of one year. D. Duties and Responsibilities: The powers and duties of the Planning Commission include preparation and submittal of the comprehensive plans and periodic amendments thereto to the City Council for implementation, periodic review and study of the provisions of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance and subdivision regulations, study of applications for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, and applications for special permits, site plan approval and preliminary and final plats. In each of the above capacities the commission ~ submits recommendations to the City Council for·~ consideration at regular City Council meetings. II. PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION (PRAC) A. Regularly meets: 7:00 p.m., second Thursday each month. B. Purpose: The purpose of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission is to review current and future community park and recreation needs, programs, and facilities and recommend actions which will promote the implementation of the City's park and recreation plans. C. Membership: The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission consists of seven members, four of whom are appointed one from each of the districts shown on the attached map. Three commissioners are appointed from the City at large. Members are appointed by the Council for staggered three year terms expiring on January 31 of each year. The Chairperson of the commission is appointed by the commission from among the members of the commission for a term of one year. D. Duties and Responsibilities: The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission is responsible for holding meetings to consider matters pertaining to parks and public recreation A programs in the City, preparing and submitted to the City .. Council a comprehensive plan and periodic amendments for the .... , ... ',. • • • III. future development of the City park and recreation system, and to act in an advisory capacity to the Council on all matters relating to park and recreation programs and issues in the City. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS A. Regularly meets: 7:00 p.m., second Tuesday of the month. B. Purpose: The purpose of the Board is to hear appeals and, where appropriate, grant adjustments to administrative determinations of the Zoning Ordinance in accordance with procedures and guidelines set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. C. Membership: The Board consists of one Planning Commissioner and six residents of the. community appointed at large. The Zoning Administrator (Building Official) serves as an ex officio member without voting rights on the Board, The Board is appointed by the Mayor and City Council with citizen members appointed for three year terms. The Commission appoints the Chairperson from the citizen members of the Board. D. Duties and Responsibilities: The Board is responsible for the consideration of applications for variances and modifications to provisions of the Zoning Ordinance relating to height, yard, area and lot width and depth regulations, sign regulations, parking and load regulations, fence regulations, minimum floor area requirements, and district boundary lines for special protection districts. Procedures for Board operations are set forth in greater detail in Section 11 of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance. For More Information More detailed data regarding the purpose, procedures and regulations governing each commission may be found in Section 305 of the Plymouth City Code and, in the case of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, in Section 11, Subd. C of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance. STAFF Planning Commission Chuck Dillerud 550-5059 Park & Recreation Eric Blank Advisory Commission Board of Adjustment Joe Ryan and Appeals 550-5131 550-5031 COMMISSION CHAIR Michael Stulberg Frank Freels Chuck Ulmer • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resour~ DATE: March 30, 1992 SUBJECT: Consideration for Construction of Second Ice Rink at the Community Center At the February 4th meeting, the City Council authorized a budget for the maximum of 2.3 million dollars for the Community Center second ice rink project. The Council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications, as well as proposed site master plan revisions that would include changes to the parking lot and access to the building. There are several issues for the Council to consider at this time, they include: cost estimates, items on alternate list, timing of the project, funding the project, land exchange with the school district, and construction of the front entry. COST ESTIMATES: Attached to this memo is a preliminary cost estimate recap that projects a cost estimate of $2,138,000 for the second ice rink. This cost estimate includes $75,000 for remodelling an entry drop-off, but does include any funding for remodelling the parking lot and entry from Valley View Road. Staff would not recommend any remodelling to the entry of the building unless the entire project, including the remodelling of the parking lot, is done at the same time, as one is integral to the other. The cost estimates include an Olympic size rink, a public entry lobby facing the school, seating for approximately 400, team rooms with utilities stubbed in for future showers and toilets, public toilets, skate tile to all skater areas and compatible quality systems and finishes to the existing facility. It also includes remodelling the existing office to expand into the two team rooms to accommodate a central office area for the Community Center Manager and the Aquatics Supervisor. At the final meeting of the Design Review Committee, members recommended adding an alternative of burnished block finish on all the wails up to 8' with a rock face block finish on all walls above 8' within the new addition. Although this alternative would be an increase in cost, it would save a significant amount in maintenance over the years. Consideration of Second Sheet of Ice March 30, 1992 Page 2 ALTERNATES: City staff recommended providing a sufficient number of alternates to ensure that the facility could be constructed at this time. The attached March 25th memorandum lists the proposed add and deduct alternates that are recommended in order of which alternates would most likely be deducted fIrst (example -substituting 45 mil EPDM for 60 mil would be the least desirable alternate). The rationale for listing these alternates in this order is that any alternate that can easily be added at later time should be eliminated first; however, those alternates that cannot be added later without construction renovation should be put in now. Del Erickson will review these alternates with the Commission and Council at the meetings on April 6 and April 7th. TIMING OF PROJECT: If the City Council authorizes going out for bid on April 7th, this project could be completed in December of 1992. The last page of the attached information provides the proposed schedule depicting the remaining portion of the process that was initiated last November. FUNDING: Staff are recommending that the City fund this project through lease revenue bonds. The approval of this project should be contingent upon the City committing to charging Eden Prairie teams $100 per hour for prime time on the existing rink and $105 per hour for prime time on the proposed Olympic size rink. As previously indicated, the revenue from $105 per hour that would be charged as of January 1, 1993 and increased $2.50 per hour per year over the 20 year life of the bonds would pay for construction costs of up to 2.3 million dollars simply selling prime time ice only seven months of the year. The estimated operating costs for this facility is between $70,000 and $80,000 per year. Although the City would expect to sell ice time beyond the 1,660 hours per year projected, the City should anticipate having to budget an additional $70,000 to $80,000 per year to operate this facility. LAND EXCHANGE: In the early 1970's the City received a LA WCON grant for acquisition of property for Round Lake Park. At that time, the City and School District jointly pooled money together to match the State and Federal grant funds. The property line between what would be School District property and City parkland was not important as long as the City received the correct amount of acreage for park property. The grant was not closed until the School District decided to locate the high school, and the park and school property lines were finally resolved in 1979 . • • • • • • Consideration of Second Sheet of Ice March 30, 1992 Page 3 The proposed rink addition would sit partially on school property and partially on city property, as the property lines are presently drawn. If the City is to use lease revenue funding for this project, the City would have to either get approval from the federal government for leasing the parkland for this purpose or redraw the schooUcity property lines, and obtain a piece of property that is completely owned by the City with no state or federal grant "strings" attached. City staff are recommending reconfiguring the city/school property lines in order to provide the flexibility of a lease revenue bond sale Attached for your review are two schematic drawings depicting existing boundaries and proposed boundaries. .. The City presently owns the parcel listed as Parcel A and would trade to the School District for Parcel A 1. This accomplishes the necessary task of keeping Round Lake Park the same acreage originally acquired through the LA WCON grant. The next step would be to trade to the School District, Parcel B, land around Forest Hills School the School District needs for expansion, for Parcel Bl and Parcel A. The City would then have acquired Parcel Bland Parcel A with no strings attached. This parcel, or a portion of this parcel, can be leased as a part of the lease purchase proposal for construction of the ice rink addition. School District staff have reviewed this proposed land trade and concur that there is no significant change in the use of either the school or park property and support the proposal. This land trade would obviously be subject to School Board approval. PARKING LOT AND ENTRY DROP-OFF REVISIONS: A copy of a revised entry to the building is also inclosed in your packet. This revision requires major changes to the entry to the Community Center. The cost estimate for this revision is approximately $150,000, assuming the majority of the parking lot and entry from Valley View Road can be done in-house, while renovation of the plaza would be contracted. The revision moves the new entry just to the east of the existing entry and provides for a one- way drop-off within 50' of the future front door. This plan also reconfigures the parking lot to accommodate approximately 60 additional cars with 33 cars located as close, or closer, than any cars in the existing parking lot. With the reorientation of the parking lot, people would be walking between rows of cars, rather than across traffic and all of the drop-off traffic would occur short of the pedestrian access into the building from the parking lot. Staff would recommend that the entry and parking lot redesign be a separate project to be authorized only after receiving bids for the second ice rink project, to determine if funding would be available for this project. The existing entry to the Community Center is an eye sore that should be addressed no matter what happens to the rest of the building. Consideration of Second Sheet of Ice March 30, 1992 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: It is unlikely that the City will soon, if ever, experience a climate as favorable for bidding construction projects or-selling_ bonds as is in existence today. The skaters in our community are willing to pay a rental fee for the use of a recreational facility that is high enough to pay for the construction of that facility. City staff have provided information that documents the need for the facility, as well as a reasonable funding alternative. City staff believe that any recreational facility that can possibly be funded with user fees should commit those user fees for construction purposes, as this is probably the only feasible way to develop those types of facilities now and in the future. Staff recommends the City Council approve the following: 1. Authorize staff to seek bids for the ice rink addition, with the understandinhg that all bids will be rejected if the facility cannot be constructed within the proposed budget. 2. Authorize staff to request the land trade with the School District. 3. 4. Authorize staff to prepare for a lease revenue bond project for funding this proposal. Authorize staff to prepare plans and specifications to approve the front entry and parking lot reconfiguration project as a separate project from the second ice rink project ( a final decision to be made on the front entry/parking lot reconfiguration once final cost estimates are completed and bids have been submitted on the second ice rink). RAL:mdd ice 111 • • • • • • TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Dave Black, Community Center Operations Supervisor March 30, 1992 Anticipated Daily Arena Ice Rental Revenues -Second Ice Ice rentals for the second :ice arena will be sold for approximately 64 hours per week (12 hours per day, Saturday and Sunday, 8 hours per day, weekdays). When dividing 64 hours per week by 7 days, the number of hours per day is approximately 9 hours per day. The following illustrates potential revenues per day at various ice rental rates. Ice Rental Time at 9 hours/day $100.00/hour $105.00/hour 1 Day $900 $945 1 Week $6300 $6615 '2 Weeks $12600 $13230 3 Weeks $18900 $19845 4 Weeks $25200 $26460 As illustrated, there is direct benefit to obtaining ice rental revenues by having ice available at the earliest possible date in the new arena. cc: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services , f· • • DATE: March 25, 1992 PROJECf: Eden Prairie Community Center Addition COMM NO: 9155 SUBJECf: Alternates MEMORANDUM 1. Add High School locker room 2. Omit portable bleachers 3. Omit dasher board installation 4. Omit scoreboard -wiring in 5. Omit roll-up concession window • 6. Omit concession counter 7. Omit sound system -EMT in 8. Omit new compressor -provide for future 9. Omit skate tile (rubber runners by owner), carpet, and base 10. Omit heat reclaim coil for HV AC -leave space in duct for future 11. Omit painting of Concrete Masonry and Hollow Metal Doors & Frames 12. Omit rough-in waste for team toilets and showers/stub to space 13. Substitute acrylic screen for tempered glass 14. Substitute ecoriomy grade dasher 15. Omit concrete footing and pier for future 16. Omit acoustic deck 17. Substitute 45 mil EPDM for 60 mil • '100 ckce .. ~~y~ .. ~.;:~.';r~ON ARCHITECTS ,,_. I .. . ... \ ' .. •• I ,.' "'a' _.' '.; '" .. ' ;415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD \ . MINNEAPOLIS MN 55426 ',_.' 612 -544-8370 PREUMINARY COST ESTIMATE -RECAP Schematic Phase Commission Number 9117 Arena Addition & Improvements to Eden Prairie Community Center February 4, 1992 TarAL ARENA ADDmON COST ESTIMATE' (33,800 S.F.) includes features & provisions for future: Running Track Lobby to Arena Gallery @ Pool Mezzanine Meeting Rooms and Storage Skylight Fire Sprinkler Systems SchooVPublic Entry Lobby 460 Seats and Future 1000 Olympic (l00x200) Ice Rink Showers and Toilets for Team Rooms Public Toilets Compatible Quality Systems and Finishes to Existing Skate Tile All Skaters Area Contingency Fund Total Arena Budget as Drawn OTHERCosrs Entry Plaza and New Drop Off Remodel Office and OH Door Parking Lot Remodel TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE NE Fees Additional Service Fees (Increased Scope) TOTAL BUDGET 101 2,050,000 100,000 2,150,000 125,000 25,000 50,000 2,350,000 125,500 11,500 ~487,OOO • • • • • • cosr REDUCTION CONCEPT A (29,900 S.F.) Omit Bleachers and Future Seating Provisions Omit Hydronic Air Heating System NHL Rink Omit Heat Reclaim Radiant Heat Lighter Quality Dasher Reduce Scale of Enay Plaza Omit Remodel Parking Lot Reduced Add Scope Fees TOTAL cosr SAVINGS (Represented in Plan Sheet A-8) CONCEPT A BUDGET cosr REDUCTION CONCEPT B (30,500 S.F.) . Lower Roof 7' (18' Clear) Omit Future Mezzanine/Roof Reduce Building Area (3000) Reduce Olympic Rink 30x60 Meters Omit Skylight 250 Seat Bleachers (Portable) Radiant/Gas Fired Air Heat Reclaim & Dasher Reduce Site Development Reduce Add Scope Fees Omit Showers and Toilet for Team Rooms TOTAL cosr SAVINGS (Represented Plan Sheet A-9) CONCEPT B BUDGET PARK BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION (Concept C)(33,OOO S.F.) Omit Hydronic Air Heating System Reduce Scale of Enay Plaza Omit Remodel Parking Lot Reduce Building Area (500) , Reduce Rink Width by 1'-6 (30 Meter) Omit Bleachers (250 -Substitute Portable) Omit Team Room Shower/Toilet (Future Rough-In) Reduce Add Scope Fee TOTAL cosr SAVINGS CONCEPT C NET BUDGET 38,000 30,000 142,000 10,000 20,000 9,000 50,000 50,000 3,000 352,000 2,135,000 60,000 22,000 80,000 3,000 22,000 23,000 50,000 19,000 100,000 7,000 40,000 426,000 2,061,000 30,000 50,000 50,000 20,000 3,000 23,000 30,000 3,000 209,000 2,278,000 2 SUGGESTED BID ALTERNATES Bleachers Lower Quality Boards Heat Reclaim Coil Future Footing and Pier Omit 50% of Slate Tile Omit Paint CMV and DRS, Omit Dasher Pod Install DEDUCT 15,000 9,000 10,000 4,000 14,000 10,000 5,000 67,000 • • 3 • • • • SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATES EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 25-Mar-92 i ~ . ORIGINAL SCHEME 1 SCHEME 1 SClmME2 SClmME2 BUDGET (MORTENSON) (MORTENSON) (DEA) (MORTENSON) (DEA) < , AREA 27,927 S.F. 33,800 S.F. 33,800 S.F. 33,000 < S.F. 33,000 S.F. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 1,003,099 1,244,049 1,141,900 < 1,254,365 1,052,800 35.92 IS.F. 36.81 IS.F. 33.78 IS.F. 38.01 IS.F. 31.90 IS.F. RINK PACKAGE 418,000 505,905 511,000 450,000 450,000 14.97 IS.F. 14.97 IS.F. 15.12 IS.F. 13.64 IS.F. 13.64 IS.F. ~ MECHANICAL 103,300 160,024 201,500 " 179,346 IS0,200 ~ 3.70 IS.F. 4.73 IS.F. 5.96 IS.F. 5.43 IS.F. 4.55 IS.F. ..c ELECTRICAL 63,850 82,278 .57,600 119,650 160,500 2.29 IS.F. 2.43 IS.F. 4.66 IS.F. 3.63 IS.F. 4.86 IS.F. CONTINGENCY 139,949 169,380 100,000 75,468 91,500 5.01 IS.F. 5.01 IS.F. 2.96 IS.F. 2.29 IS.F. 2.77 IS.F . TOTAL • ,728,.98 2,161,635 2,112,000 2,078,829 1,905,000 61.88 IS.F. 63.95 IS.F. 62.49 IS.F. 62.99 IS.F. 57.73 IS.F. REMODEL 25,000 25,000 25,000 < ENTRY DROP OFF 125,000 75,000 75,000 PARKING 50,000 PROFESSION·AL FEES 137,000 133,000 133,000 TOTAL .,728,198 2,161,635 < 1 2,449,000 2,311,829 ' < <'2,138,000 \ PRELIMINARY ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER 25-Mu-92 ROOM IDESCRIPTION FLOOR NO. 100 liCE RINK SAND AINTED WAINSCOT. WEIGHT ROCK-FACED CMU CEILING EXPOSED STEEL -PREPAINTED • ~ 19JH~1' U)92 1992--;:~-1 NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUt AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN -_._----------r-r-r-.. ----' .-- PRE-DESIGN .-- CONTRACT AWARD 9-0\ GATI£R IWUT FROM TASK FORCE Z~-I oy PREP ARE PRINTED PROGRAM t'-I"" SCHEMATIC DESIGN lis I ~D< e BRAINSTORM DESIGN CONCEPTS I"O~ PREPARE ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS ... !'""!'" PRaIMINARY COST ESTIMATES "" REVIEW aid APPROVE PROGRAM I'" 18 e REVIEW w/ TASK FORCE aid SB..ECT DIRECTION 1-18 c I", ~ GArteR AS-euR.T I"'ORMATION COt.f'lETE SCIStA TICS. CODE REVIEW Q) TASK FORCE REVIEW aid APPROVAL Z9~.k ~ ~ PRESENTATION to CITY COlIlCIL 4 eb DESIGN DEVELOPMENT .Io!c I Q) U COt.f'UTERIZE SCISCA TIC DRAWINGS I BUILDING SYSTEMS 0EVa0Pt.ENT b PRELIMINARY STRUCTUW.. ..... """1: PRELIMINARY MECHANICAL """"""!"" .~ PRaIMINARY ELECTRICAL .......... i"" ~ PRaIMINARY SPECIFICATIONS 1"'1'" ::s REVISE PRaIMINARY COST ESlIMA TE I: ~ lJ'OA TE CODE aid ZONING REVIEW I""" TASKFORCE REVIEW :. 1*' APPROVAL BY COlIlCIL .. 8 Fel 0 ONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Tiles IWI ~ U I" ARCHITECTUW.. DRAWINGS STRUCTUW.. DRAWINGS Q) MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS .~ REFRIDGERA TION DOCtJ.4ENTS .~ ACOUSTIC REVIEW aid RECOt.t.4ENDA TIONS I Nt"" SPECIFICATIONS cd TASK FORCE REVIEW o -} Ir ~ FiNAl Cl£CKING CIld CORRECTIONS : .!""~ P-4 COlJlCIL APPROVAL TO BID I""' 7~ BIDDING Ia 11 ~ Q) BIDDING I-I"'" ""d BID OPENING Z ~a CONTRACT NEGOTIA liONS I~ ~ I~ CONTRACT AWARD 9 ~o CONSTRUCTION zslWlPa I. PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING Z ~ Y 1 ~ '-- CONSTRUCTION SL8ST ANTIAL COMPLETION -19 IN< .. [ STAFF TRAINING aid ORIENTATION !"" LET TI£ SKATING BEGIN 03~DI - i.~~' ·'I"I'';~''''rNt.mq ,-2 $ JI 1 ... Wi ............... ,.L." . • • • .....) C5' C- J ., oL· :"V'''.~ ~. ".j"'-",;.. ,J' :~ t ...... " • ~ ~-.-... ;~ " . .; / .- / ,u // / P , .r~A' /.~.,,// / ~'// /".$-# ,/~:~/ c. ...•. -:.'!, • -- o. 0 ••• ---.-. -----.--N ---:;l. :.::::1 '2 ,--------------_.-----------.. --. , I I -. i -Jj o 0 I ! ----....J;J 1 I I I I I I -----.JI ... -. ... .-. . . ~ - , J l " ~ / / / ( .;;~-:-- '--"'\ 7 :=..-.l. _ ~ . - -~ ::t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i p ""d ~ / .. = --:r 4-.,. • ~ I.E , ] F ~ J '§ ,. ~ I Q~ ~ ~~ ~ z •• \. --, " \ ... " , \ \ , , \, '\ .\ " '\'. ~~ ~~ .::--~ i' ./ /1 / ENTRY PLAZA • ~ " ./ "" '", .-... ,~) OL YMPiC RINK NHL RINK ---=-~~~ _ '-_--:1 ----------< ~ IUUl T'-:~fY :::--.~ jj i i . / .,- / " '. \ ) / / / / / , , MASTER PLAN -LOWER LEVEL ._# __ 0_-.... _ "_. . . , .:"\ ,,.' ...... \\1 \11"'"."00 \ \ \ , / / i ... , I ".;.'/. ! •• .,.y.f. i ~'" I, ~'~~lf, ~ rtto". lMMrtc.ts ! :;;::i.~.:-::~\:..~ I : a..," 0""" S'ltOMlt \ I' I ", ... =,!~~:s_ "1 ••• -. \ I ----... 'I ' 'i.. 1 i' I I ~ ~ .'~ [~l~~i~ . , ~ tx:I t- tx:Iz O:::tx:lZ -u o ~ -~:-t­P..t-_ -0 W?::~ 0:::: I tx:I:::; ...-. i l 0 I: u I , : i I' : .' M-2 • • • TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Request to Council: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Planning David Lindahl, Planner March 12, 1992 SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) STRATEGY PLAN FOR 1-494 CORRIDOR The 1-494 Corridor Commission is seeking endorsement of the attached Strategic Plan for Implementing TDM in the 1-494 Corridor from each member city before finalizing the plan. Plan Preparer/Sponsor: Comsis Corporation, a California based transportation consultant, prepared the Plan for the 1-494 Corridor Commission. The Commission is a Joint Powers Organization (JPO) created to research, plan, and coordinate the implementation of strategies that reduce growing traffic congestion on 1-494. Members include Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Edina, Richfield, and Minnetonka. Purpose: The main purpose of the Plan is to provide a strategy for implementing TDM within the southwest corridor of 1-494. The Plan details the process needed to set up a corridor-wide TOM program. This Plan will help guide the JPO cities in reaching a consensus about which TOM requirements to include in the final Plan, and how best to carry out or enforce them, ie, trip reduction ordinance vs. policy. Problem: Peak hour traffic congestion in the 1-494 corridor will get worse as the population and employment of the area increases. Physical improvements to this segment of 1-494 are not expected to begin until 1997. Although MnDot expects that once the planned improvements are complete that 1-494 will accommodate forecasted traffic volumes to 2010, TOM will be necessary to help relieve congestion before and during the reconstruction process. TOM will also help reduce impacts of increased traffic levels on local roads. What is TDM?: Transportation Demand Management (TOM) refers to any techniques used to reduce traffic congestion through managing "travel demand." TOM techniques or strategies reduce traffic congestion by shifting commuters from drive alone to shared ride arrangements. TDM strategies include car/van pooling, transit 1 ~Ol or bus use, variable work hours, High Occupancy Vehicle (HOy) lanes, and preferential parking . TDM Strateev Plan Summary: TDM is expected to help reduce peak hour traffic congestion before and during reconstruction of 1-494, planned to begin in 1997. TOM also should help manage congestion on local roads, since it is estimated that for every vehicle trip taken off 494 through a corridor-wide program, two trips will be taken off local roads. The Plan estimates that peak hour traffic can be reduced through TDM by 8-32%. The percent reduction depends on which TOM strategies are applied, whether they are mandatory or voluntary, and if they are applied to new or existing development, or both. These issues need to be resolved by the participating cities before the plan can be fmalized. Comsis recommends implementing the Plan in three phases, with the timing of each phase tied to MnDot's reconstruction schedule. Phase one could begin in 1993 and would mainly involve developing a political consensus among key participants on recommended strategies, finalizing and adopting an enforcement mechanism (model ordinance/policy), starting a corridor-wide educational program, and requiring employers and building managers to fulfill basic reporting requirements. Phase two and three would begin before reconstruction (1995) and trip reduction requirements would be imposed to mandate TOM performance targets. Certain performance targets will be established (3-5% reduction by 1997) that could be measured either through percent trip reductions, average vehicle occupancy (1.2 to 1.6), or commute alternative rate (80% • drive alone, 20% carpool and transit). The Plan will mainly involve participation by employers, although developers and building managers also would be included. Comsis suggests enforcing the Plan through • a trip reduction ordinance or policy statement enacted by each member city. A model trip reduction ordinance would be developed that is flexible enough for all cities to adopt as either an ordinance or policy statement. If the basic requirements and timing of phasing are the same for each city, the specific performance targets, administrative requirements and penalties can differ between cities. After each member cities' Council is presented with the Plan concept, a "stakeholder's" meeting will be held in June, involving a detailed presentation of the Plan by Comsis. Key employers, developers, building managers,and council members from the five cities will be asked to attend this meeting. Input from this meeting will be used to help Comsis and the JPO address any unresolved questions and issues in the Plan. See Exhibit A on back page for plan implemenation framework and flow chart. TDM Plan SpecificslHighlights: Growth Forecasts: • 1-494 corridor is the second fastest growing commercial real estate market in the Twin Cities. Even with the current slow-down in growth, the area will remain a prime area for office, retail, commercial, and residential growth. • Population in the corridor will increase 20% by 2010 (256,000 to 303,(00). • Employment will increase over 70% (150,00 jobs to 260,(00). • More than 50 million square feet of office and industrial space existed in 1988, with 12 million square feet of retail space. In 1988 it was forecasted that by 2010, about 30 million additional • 2 • • • • square feet of office and industrial space and 9 million commercial retail space would be developed in the corridor. Although, these forecasts may be optimistic due to the current recession, the absorption of existing vacant office and industrial space (22 %) alone will increase traffic significantly in the corridor. Traffic will increase in corridor from 2.7 to 3.7 million average daily trips. Existing Commuter Habits: • Over 6,500 employees within three areas of the corridor were surveyed to determine commuter habits and possible interest in TOM. About 90% of the respondence drove alone, with 60% using their car for a mid-day personal trip. About 10% of the respondence used alternative forms of transportation, which were usually 2-person carpools. The survey results coupled with feedback from focus group meetings suggest that without some incentives, or disincentives, most people will not switch to shared-ride modes or change their work arrangements to reduce peak hour travel. Role of TDM within Corridor: • TOM is expected to help reduce traffic congestion within the corridor, especially before and during reconstruction of 1-494. Yet, emphasis should continue to be placed on managing existing infrastructure through road expansion and system management, as well as managing new growth through land use controls. TDM Goals for 494 Corridor: • • • Manage existing congestion and reduce congestion based on future projections. Maintain or improve mobility options available to commuters and residents (through enhanced transit options, park-and-ride opportunities, etc.) and contribute to the high quality of life Minnesotans have come to expect. Preserve the environment, including improving air quality and preserving energy, in the corridor and the region. - TDM Objectives to Address Goals: • • • • • Mitigate the impacts of 1-494 reconstruction (congestion). Reduce peak period vehicle trips (congestion). Shift commuters to non-peak periods (congestion). Enhance and improve the quality, cost effectiveness and availability of commute alternatives (mobility). Reduce CO emissions and energy use (environmental). Estimated ImpactS of TDM: Comsis examined various TDM strategies to determine their affect on reducing future tnlffic. TDM strategies examined include: HOY lane, improved transit service, fare reductions, employer subsidies, rideshare programs, variable work hours, preferential parking, and parking charges or taXes. 3 A medium and high package of TDM strategies were developed. Both packages included all the above strategies. The difference is that the medium package was applied more modestly than the high, ie, less • employer provided subsidy, lower parking charges, less aggressive rideshare promotion, etc. These packages were applied to two groups: 1) future employers at new developments ("new mandatory"); 2) all employment, existing and future employers ("full mandatory"). Trip reduction forecasts from this analysis are as follows: Medium/New Mandatory 3% 8% Medium/Full 6% 18% High/New Mandatory 8% 20% High/Full Mandatory 11% 32% It is estimated that two area-wide trips will be reduced for every one trip reduced on 494, because the trips within the corridor that do not use 494 also will be reduced through a corridor-wide TDM program. A consensus needs to be reached by the JPO cities about which TDM strategies are feasible in the corridor, and if they will be applied at new or existing developments before a corridor-wide reduction. goal can be set. Once this is done, Comsis will do a final TDM analysis to determine the optimal trip reduction target. The final reduction goal will be recommended between 8 % and 32 % • Phasing of TDM Implementation: Since the need for implementing TDM relates largely to the timing of reconstruction of 1-494, the recommended phasing plan follows the proposed reconstruction schedule. The phasing plan can be adjusted to reflect possible changes to the timing of reconstruction. Phase 1 -Pre-construction (1993 -1997) • Develop political consensus on recommended TDM strategy, and finalizing model ordinance or policy statement necessary to implement plan. • Cities adopt trip reduction ordinance or policy. • Employers and building owners fulfill reporting requirements so a baseline of information can be developed. • A corridor-wide TDM educational program should complement requirements. Phase 2 -Reconstruction Mitigation (1995 -2010) • • Employer trip reduction requirements imposed to mandate TDM performance targets . Enforcement begins and penalties may be considered to encourage compliance . 4 • • • • Schedule for these targets will be tied to desired reduction adopted by each city. Program should be implemented concurrently by all cities. Phase 3 -Post-Construction (1997 -2010) • Mitigation program and employer compliance monitored to assess fulfillment of trip reduction goals. • If performance targets are broadly being missed, specific TOM strategies, such as parking management or financial incentives, could be prescribed and made mandatory as part of employer requirements. PerjoT11lll1lCe Targets: An overall performance target should be established between 8-32% by 2010, with interim targets set for each phase. Cities could set their own targets provided their contribution is proportional to overall 2010 target. The interim targets could be as follows: • Phase 1 Targets -2-5% trip reduction. These would be set low to reflect voluntary programs and growing experience by employers with TDM and reporting requirements. • Phase 2 Targets -These targets would be determined to reflect trip reduction levels needed for reconstruction mitigation. • Phase. 3 Targets -These should be set to reach the overall 2010 target. Targets could be measured in one of the following three ways: • • • Commute Alternative Rate (CAR) -20% 180% Commute Alternative Rate or non~rive alone mode split by 2010. Trip Reduction (fR) -Between 8 & 32% reduction over projected 2010 levels. Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO) -from 1.2 to 1.6 AVO by 2010. The Communte Alternative Rate (CAR) is recommended for measuring performance targets based on its ease of understanding by employers, and the ability to relate the measure back to the overall trip reduction target. Application of 1DM Techniques: The TOM program will be performance based. Participants can comply by using any set of TOM techniques that achieve targets, since no single set of techniques will work in every situation. Employers should experiment with various techniques to find out how they best fit into their corporate culture, benefit package, employee classifications, and physical setting. Requirements should be imposed on the three distinct groups: • •• Employers -Most of the requirements should be with employers. Sites with 100 or more employers would comply first. Sites with less than 100 could begin complying in Phase 2 with less stringent requirements . Developers -Requirements focus on site design improvements conducive to TDM. Developer's 5 • role can be enlarged if cities concentrate development around major retail centers, designed to be major transit hubs, by providing access to these hubs. • Multi-tenant Buildings -These buildings could be included to capture the impacts of TDM on smaller employers (1-49). 7DM Program Enforcement: Employers, developers, and building managers will all playa central role in implementing TDM. Most of the requirements related to the Plan will be placed on these three groups. To achieve any measurable results on traffic reduction through a TDM program, a trip reduction ordinance or policy statement should be enacted by each member city. A model trip reduction ordinance should be developed that would be flexible enough for each city to adopt. As long as the overall target, basic requirements and timing of phasing are the same for each city, the specific performance targets, administrative requirements and penalties can differ between cities. The JPO would monitor each cities' contribution to the Plan. The model ordinance could be administered by the 'Cities, the JPO or a combination of the two. In San Mateo County, south of San Fransisco, six cities have formed an interjurisdictional authority through a joint powers agreement and have all passed the same trip reduction ordinance. Each city enforces the ordinance within their city, but the program is administered by the JPO staff. It is expected that one half- to full-time administrator will be needed to handle various functions, such as: developing a database of employers, notification of employers and building owners, site plan review for new development, report plan review and approval. One clear role for the member cities is as leader in implementing TDM as an employer. This sends a clear signal to business community that the city is a partner in TDM implementation. If the requirements imposed by each city are the same, it is more feasible for the JPO (TDM Coordinator) to administer the program. • Agencies such as the Met Council, MnDot, and the RTB should all support TDM policies, and should encourage other cities to implement similar TDM programs in congested corridors. This could help reduce through-trips on the southwest segment of 1-494. Other agencies expected to be play key roles in implementing a corridor-wide TDM program include Minnesota Rideshare and Improve 1-494. Minnesota Rideshare will provide ride matching assistance, technical assistance in employee surveying, reporting and plan preparation, and other commute management services. Improve 1-494, a private Transportation Management Organization (TMO) involving employers and developers within 'the 1-494 corridor, also should playa major role in implementing the Plan. Any other service providers should help in promoting the Plan. Implementation Schedule: The recommended schedule for program implementation and the tasks included in each phase is as follows: 1992-1993 OrdinancelPolicy Approval -Tasks include: Developing consensus on TDM Strategic Plan, educate stakeholder$and solicit their input; draft,' revise, and complete Strategic Plan and model ordinance or policy framework; determine role of existing, planned or needed regional/state polici. 6 • • • 1993-1997 Phase 1 (pre-Construction) - 1995-2010 Phase 2 (Reconstruction) 1997-2010 Phase 3 (post-Construction) - and programs; determine appropriate administrative and support roles of JPO, cities, and others; approve ordinance or policy at all 5 cities. Tasks include: Evaluate effective TDM strategies, educate participants of requirements; implement employer, developer, and building owner requirements; assure that complementary federal/state and regional policies and programs are in place. Tasks include: Implement mitigation program; promote interim HOV lanes and improved commute alternatives; initiate employer performance targets and enforcement; assure that cities have initiated . requirements by agreed-upon date. Tasks include: Evaluate long term affects of mitigation phase; assess each cities' contribution to corridor target; modify requirements to prescribe specific techniques at a given site rather than specify a performance target only; modify each cities' ordinance to increase effectiveness as necessary to achieve corridor-wide goals . Any further details about the Plan will be presented by Comsis at the stakeholder's meeting to be announced . 7 TDM POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWOR~ 1-494 SfRATEG IC PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTING TDM IN THE 1-494 CO RRIDOR March 1992 I Final I JPO Consensus formed by "stakeholders" about specifics of Strategy Plan at the end of Consensus tbe ordinance approval phase (late '92). JPO would seek business and public ageny "buy-in" to the TDM strategy and ordinance, or at minimum, resolve key concerns raised by tbe business community. ,. ~ Adopt I CITIES May include enactment of either an ordinance or policy, which would Ordinance mandate programs of employers and building owners, and outline requirements of UC' .~~ ,-through existinl! review 1-'1 ...... C""" .. This task would be done by JPO staff, as empowered by tbe Cities. Lists I Notify I JPO of businesses could be acquired from cities, state employment records or Businesses commercial sources. Alternatively, self-identification would involve businesses of a certain size to be required to notify the JPO of their existence and intent to l:'uml-'Iy • .. ,. I Train • TMO This task would involve educating employers of the requirements, training Coordinators MINNESOTA in-house coordinators, and providing ongoing assistance to businesses RIDESHARE during plan preperation and implementation. The best arrangement may be locating a Minnesota Rideshare staff person at the TMO for delivering these services. Since neither the TMO or Mn. Rideshare has been approaChed witb any specific request, this is the preferred approach, from the stand-point of the JPO and Cities. ~ l Prepare • BUSINESSES Plans Businesses would prepare reports or TDM plans with assistance from TMO and Mn. Rideshare. Plans would be reviewed and approved by JPO and approvals or rejections forwarded to each City for recording (approved plans) ,. or action (rejected plans). I Review/Approve I JPO Plans 1 .~ Enforce • CITIES JPO Cities would enforce compliance by informing firms (perhaps through JPO) Compliance in non-compliance of required actions (fines, resubmit plans, etc.). The Cities, given their police powers, would adjudicate any situation where non-compiance could not be resolved ~Io- I Monitor • JPO JPO would monitor the performance of each city in reaching its targets and Performance contributing to corridor-wide targets for reducing trips. The JPO could prepare an annual or biennial report to the Cities summarizing the performance of each city and making any recommendations or changes to ordinance, administrative onidelines. eE1pl~ otJtreach, etc. ,. y Review • CITIES Each City would then make appropriate revisions to the ordinance and to the Ordinance role of the JPO in administering the requirements. I Acronyms: ~ __ ~~~ ____ -= ______ ~~~ ____ ~~ __ ~~~~~==~ ______ ~ ______ ~ Exhibit A , ,I '. I I' , ., "