Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/21/1992• • • SPECIAL CITY COUNcn.. MEETING CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET REVIEW TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1992 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: ROLL CALL -I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. DISCUSSION ITEMS 6:00 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl Jullie, AsSistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Engineer AI Gray, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick • A. Uses of Tax Increment Receipts B. Tax Increment Project Plans Page 97 Page 103 ill. OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS. IV. ADJOURNMENT • AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1m 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. JuWe, Assistant to the City· Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly ,Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris. Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural ReSources Robert Lambert, Director of Publlc Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL L APIB.oYAL OF AGENDA AND QTug ITEMS OF BUSJNF.SS n. MIN1JTF.S OF CITY COUNCIL MEitTJNG BElD TI1F.§DAY, . JANUARY 7. un m. CONSENT CA,IfRNQAR. A. B. Tax Forfeited 14JMk (Resolution No. 92-12) c. Adoption of PrgcJamation "Eden Prairie LoYCS Its Kida" (Resolution No. 92-26) D. t\mn,'eyal of CIty's Pay kukJ IQmImnDtign R.egort E. AImroyai ofJoiat MHfhw SdleduIe with BamJsIOnmisIiRn F. llegpest for 3-y. gtmsion to Coundl's 12/13188 erJiqn on Yarianr& 81-51. Touch of Qn G. GOLF POIND by Associated Investments, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 29-91 Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 2.24 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Golf Pointe; Adoption of Resolution· 92-22, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 29-91 and Ordering Publlcation of Said SmDmary. Location: South of Valley View Road, east of the abandoned Chicago Northwestern Railway. (Ordinance #29-91-Rezoning; Resolution 92-22 -Authorizing Summary and Publication) Page 106 Page 117 Page 119 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 131 • • • • •• • City Council Agenda January 21,1992 Page Two H. RICE MARSH LAKE ftJD by The ·Pemtom Company. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 31-91-PUD-11-9l, PUD District Review, with waivers on 129.8 acres and Rezoning from R1:IraI, Rl-13.S, and Rl-9.S on 10S.0 acres, and from Rural and Rl-9.S to Rl-9.5 on 24.8 acres, all said 129.8 acres overlain by PUD 11-91~Rl- 13.5-Rl-9.5; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Rice Marsh Lake PUD; Adoption of Resolution 92-24, Authorizing Summary of Ordinance 31-91-PUD-11-9l and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: North of Rice Marsh Lake, just east of the Chanhassen-Eden Prairie city limits. (Ordinance 31-91-PUD-11-9l -PUD District Review, with waivers and Rezoning; Resolution 92-24 -Authorizing Summary and Publication) L Amendment to A&reemmt with GoocJwiDJF.eder Seal for Reg •• Center J. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR GOLF JlQINT£, located south of Valley View Road and east of Hennepin County R.R. right-of-way (Resolution No. 92-14) K. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR WINnFIElD 1ST ADDmON, located south of TH 5, east of Chanhassen City Limits (Resolution No. 92-15) L MSA Variance to ADOlf Egenditure ofMSA Funds Outside of the City IJmib for TmrnIine Road (Resolution No. 92-16) M. MSA Curve Radius Variance for Beqgtmdion of R.owland R.oad. LC. 52-Q67 (ResoIutioD No. 92-17) N. un Bud&et R.eyision for Utility Vehkks . O. 2nd Readimr of OrdilNlnce No. 1-92 Awndin. Sedion 5.40 of the City Code Re1ptinz to Lawful Gtpnhlig. and Adopion of BesolutionNo. 92-25 Aguroyina the SummaI'.! of the 0rcJinsmr& for Publication Page 137 Page 148 Page 150 Page 153 Page 156 . Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 City Coundl A&enda January 21, 1992 Page Three IV. PUBUCBlWUNGS A. MAXTON POND by westar Properties, Inc. Request for Zoning District Cbanae from Rural to·RI-13.S on 3.6 acres; and Pre1iminary Platting of 3.6 acres into six single famBy lots and road right-of-way to. be .. known as Braxton Pond. Location: South and west of the terminus of existing Braxton Drive. (Ordinance 2-92 -Zoning District Change; Resolution 92-19 -Preliminary Plat). Cop-tinued from January 7, 1m B. lUVERDEW HEIGHTS by Hustad Homes and .Robert and James Brown. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept on 6S acres; .Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers, on 6S acres and Zoning District Change·from RI-22 to RI-13.S on S.7 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the RI-22 District on S".O acres and Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-44 on IS.7 acres; Preliminary Plat of 6S acres into 34 sin&le famOy lots, 3 outIots and road right-Of-way to be known as Riverview Heights. Location: South of Riverview Road, east of Riverview Drive East. (Resolution· 92-20 - Planned Unit Development Concept; Ordinance 3-92-PUD-1-92 and Rezoning; Resolution 92-21 -Preliminary Plat) v. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VL OBDINANCES AND BF$OLUTIONS VB. Mi110N, REQUFSTS AND COMM1JNlCATIONS . A. NOnnark PtQjed B. 1st and 2nd Rpdiga of OnJiP'P No. +92 AmmiInc City. Code Sr£tiotw 4.01. SubtI. 9, 4.Ql, Subd. 8, 4.07, 4.12, Subd. 1 .. AMor SedioD 4.22 and B!!IIIIQ!herina Section 4.3Q and AnvpIinc SectioN "4.», Subd. 4. 4.34. 4.51, Subd. 6, 4.54. 4.71. Subd. 6.. and 4.73 and Adpndnr by B.efenwe CIty Code Chapter 1 and Section 4." wbidt IIII9ftI other f:hina, COJiUin gendy Dl'Oyisious, and AdoJItion of BaoJution No. 92-27 . . AIPJII'ODn, the s-mm of the 0nJinanre for Publiqtitp vm. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS A COMMilTEIf$ • Page 161 'P~ge 166 • Page 183 Page 193 Page 194 . . • • • • City Council. Agenda January 21, 1992 Page Four IX. APPOIN'IMENTS A. Lower Minnesota River Watershed DWrid .. Recommendation of Eden Prairie Resident to rill aD expired three-year term on the Lower Minnesota Watershed District beginning March 23, ·1992 x. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Re,uorts of ConndImrmbers 1. SH"a Adiuslment for City MI •• B. Revolt of City MI_eer 1. 'I'imin& and Content for Park Boad ReferencJnm C. Regort of Dinctor of Parks. R.ecreatioD " Natural Resoon;e D. Report of Dinctor of ",ouinl E. Rgort of Dinctor of Public Works 1. Award Contracts for snoW gloJriN. mujpnent (ResolutioD No. 92-18) XI. OTHER BUSINESS xn. ADJOURNMENT • • • DRAFT 1/15/92 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council THROUGH: City Manager, Carl Jullie FROM: Richard Rosow, City Attorney DATE: January 15, 1992 RE: Tax Increment Financing Staff has requested our assistance in describing the types of restrictions that apply to the use of tax increments generated by Tax Increment Districts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 within Development District No. 1. By way of background, Development District No. 1 was designated under Minn. Stat § 469.124 -§ 469.134 on September 22, 1981. A Development Program was adopted at the same time. The Development Program was amended on March 30, 1982, May 17, 1983, and April 17, 1990. 1. 2. 3. In proceeding on the tax increment issues, the council should use the following guidelines: Tax increment financing revenues derived from existing Tax Increment Financing Districts may be spent only within Development District No. 1 as the geographic area is currently defined or as amended should the Council undertake the proper steps to do so. Restrictions on the use of tax increment financing revenues, prohibiting their use for commercial enterprises, are effective for tax increment financing districts established as Economic Development Districts which are certified subsequent to April 30, 1990. Any new tax increment financing district established in Development District No.1 must use 75% of the revenues derived from tax increments paid by properties in that tax increment district on activities in the district or to pay bonds. The remaining 25% may be expended on activities outside the tax increment district but within the geographic area of the Development District No. 1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS Minn. Stat. §§ 469.124 -469.134 is entitled City Development Districts. This section works in concert with Minn. Stat §§ 469.174 -469.179, entitled Tax Increment Financing. Under the Tax Increment Financing Act, the City may undertake projects using tax increments captured within tax increment financing districts. The tax increment financing districts the City 01 City Council January 15, 1992 Page 2 has established are described under the Tax Increment Financing Act as Economic Development Districts. Economic Development Districts are a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a project which the City has found to be in the public interest because it discourages commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state or municipality; or it will result in increased employment in the state; or it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state. The Projects undertaken through the use of tax increments captured from Economic Development Districts are those that are authorized by the City Development Districts Act. Under the City Development Districts Act, the City can within Development District No. 1, do the following: 1. Adopt a program consistent with which the City may acquire, construct . . . promote developments aimed at improving the physical facilities, quality of life, and quality of transportation; 2. 3. Acquire land or easements; Adopt ordinances regulating traffic, skyway systems, public parking structures and other facilities constructed within the Development District; 4. Adopt ordinances regulating access to pedestrian skyway systems; 5. Designate districts for mined underground space developments; 6. Require private developers to construct buildings to accommodate and support pedestrian systems; 7. Install special lighting systems, special street signs and street furniture, special landscaping of streets and public property, and special snow removal systems; 8. Acquire property for the district; 9. Lease or sell air rights over public buildings and spend public funds for constructing the foundations and columns in the public buildings strong enough to support the buildings to be constructed on air rights; 10. Lease all or portions of basements, ground and second floors of the public buildings constructed in the District; and • • • • • • City Council January 15, 1992 Page 3 11. Negotiate the sale or lease of property for private development if the development is consistent with the development program for the district The funds used to finance the projects to be undertaken within Development District No. 1, are those tax increments generated through the Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 2 -7. A Tax Increment Financing District that is an Economic Development District is limited to a duration of eight (8) years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment or ten (10) years from the approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan, whichever is less. In addition to the limitations set forth under the City Development Districts Act, revenue derived from tax increment may only be used in accordance with the Tax Increment Financing Plan and solely for the following purposes: 1. To pay the principal of an interest on bonds issued to finance a project; 2 . To finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of a Development District pursuant to §§ 469.124 -469.134 3. To finance or otherwise pay premiums for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal and interest on bonds 4. To accumulate a reserve securing the payment of principal and interest on the bonds. The City has been previously advised by Dorsey & Whitney that in their opinion, tax increments collected from a Tax Increment Financing District may be held for the payment of costs identified in the Tax Increment Financing Plan after the Tax Increment Financing District has expired in accordance with the Act. Dorsey & Whitney also informed the City that, in their opinion, the City may expand the geographic boundaries of Development District No. 1 for the purpose of adding additional public improvements which would be undertaken in the new area which would be paid for from the tax increments derived from the Tax Increment Financing Districts. Any expansion of the geographic boundaries of Development District No.1 requires a discussion, public hearing and findings required for the original plan. In 1990, the legislature adopted amendments to the Tax Increment Financing Act which restrict the use of increments from Economic Development Districts. These amendments apply to any new Tax Increment Financing District established as an Economic Development District for which certification is requested after April 30, 1990. Revenues from such new Economic Development Districts may not be used to provide improvements or assistance in any form to developments consisting of buildings and ancillary facilities, if at least 10% of the buildings and City Council January 15, 1992 Page 4 facilities (determined on the basis of square footage) are used for a purpose other than: 1. Manufacturing of personal property; 2. Warehousing, storage, and distribution of property, but excluding retail sales; 3. Research and development or telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use of the property; or 4. Tourism facilities located outside the metropolitan area. Up to 25% of the buildings and facilities may be used for nonqualifying purposes to the extent the nonqualifying square footage is directly related to, and in support of, the qualifying activity. In 1990 and again in 1991 the legislature adopted further restrictions on the use of tax increments described as "Restrictions on Pooling." These restrictions apply to tax increment districts for which certification is requested after April 30, 1990. The amendments restrict the • expenditures of tax increment revenues outside the Tax Increment Financing District. The • amendments provide that 75% of the revenue paid by properties in the Tax Increment Financing District must be expended on activities in the district or to pay bonds used to finance activities or pay debt service on credit-enhanced bonds. No more than 25% may be spent on activities outside the Tax Increment Financing District but within the geographic area of Development District No.1 except to pay debt service on credit-enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered activities outside the district. Further, the anti-pooling provisions also include what is described as a "Five Year Rule" on the use of funds. In order to meet the 75% restriction set out above, the revenues must be expended on qualifying activities before or within five years after certification of the Tax Increment Financing District. Activities which qualify for the expenditure of the 75% of the revenue are defined as acquisition of property, clearing of land, site preparation, soils correction, removal of hazardous or pollution, installation of utilities, construction of public or private improvements, and other similar activities, but only to the extent that tax increment revenues may be spent for such purpose under other law. 1. In proceeding on the tax increment issues, the council should use the following guidelines: Tax increment financing revenues derived from existing Tax Increment Financing Districts may be spent only within Development District No.1 as the geographic area is currently defined or as amended should the Council undertake the proper steps to do so . IUO • • • • City Council January 15, 1992 Page 5 2. Restrictions on the use of tax increment financing revenues, prohibiting their use for commercial enterprises, are effective for tax increment financing districts established as Economic Development Districts which are certified subsequent to April 30, 1990. 3. Any new tax increment fmancing district established in Development District No.1 must use 75% of the revenues derived from tax increments paid by properties in that tax increment district on activities in the district or to pay bonds. The remaining 25% may be expended on activities outside the tax increment district but within the geographic area of the Development District No. 1. SOILS CONDITION DISTRICTS Staff has also requested that we address the establishment of tax increment districts used to provide revenue for soil correction. The Tax Increment Financing Act established a type of district called a Soils Condition District. A Soils Condition District is a type of Tax Increment Financing District in which the following conditions exist: 1. Less than 70% of the parcels in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements; 2. Unusual terrain or soil deficiencies for 80% of the acreage in the District require substantial filling, grading or other physical preparation for use; 3. The estimated cost of the physical preparations under clause 2, excluding the cost of roads and other local improvements under 429.021, when added to the fair market value of the land upon inclusion in the district, exceeds the anticipated fair market value of the land upon completion of the preparation. An area cannot qualify as a Soils Condition District if it contains a wetland a defined under Minn. Stat. § 103G.005 unless a development agreement prohibits draining, filling or other alteration of the wetland or other legally binding assurances are provided for preservation of the wetland. Further, the proposed development of the district in the Tax Increment Financing Plan must be consistent with the City's land use plan and reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. No parcel may be included in a Soils Condition District unless the City has concluded an agreement for the development of at least 50% of the acreage having the unusual soil or terrain deficiencies. The agreement must provide recourse for the City if the development is not completed. 101 City Council January 15, 1992 Page 6 Any Soils Condition District established by the City within Development District No. 1 would be subject to the restrictions on pooling and the five-year limitation on expenditures of funds described above. The prohibitions on the use of funds for other than manufacturing, warehousing, etc. are applicable only to Economic Development Districts and not Soils Condition Districts. :esr rfr\ep'citycoun.mem IO n., (~ • • • • • • 12. City share of cost to create Purgatory Recreation Area Park improve:ments west of Prairie Center Drive 13. Projects identified in the 1985 BRW Traffic Study a. Additional tum lanes on Bryant Lake Drive at Valley View Road b. Intersection improvements at Prairie Center Drive and Valley View Road c. Through lane and intersection improvements on Prairie Center Drive between Viking Drive and West 78th Street d. Additional through lane in each direction on T.H. 169 at Prairie Center Drive and extension of tum lane between T.H. 169 and Joiner Way on Prairie Center Drive e. Intersection improvements at Washington Avenue and Valley View Road 14. First Phase soil correction (surcharging) of realigned Technology Drive west of Prairie Center Drive in conjunction with T.H. 212 improvements 15. Miscellaneous pedestrian trails/sidewalks a. Trails and sidewalks along each side of Prairie Center Drive east of T.H. 169 to West 78th Street b. Trail around Lake Idlewild c. Sidewalk along east side of Top View Drive between Roberts Drive and Valley View Road 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor ~~nd City Council THROUGH: Carl JuHie, City Manager FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: January 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Urban Design Improvements in the Major Center Area The total cost for Urban Design features within the Major Center Area is $3,827,000. Categories for improvements would include normal street lighting, decorative street lighting, landscaping, sidewalks, street furniture, and overpasses. Street Lighting Decorative Street Lighting Sidewalks Landscaping Street Furniture Overpasses TOTAL Street Lighting Decorative Street Lighting Sidewalks Landscaping Street Furniture Overpasses TOTAL $534,000 $250,000 $276,000 $290,000 $250,500 $500,000 $2,100,000 $887,000 $500,000 $497,000 $496,000 $447,000 $1,000,000 $3,827,000 $107,000 $150,000 $157,000 $120,000 $100,000 $500,000 $1,134,000 $ 50,000 $196,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ -0-$ 64,000 $ 40,000 $ 46,000 $ 51,000 $ 46,000 $ -0-$ -0- $191,000 $402,000 **Street Furniture -Street furniture would include benches, walls, banners, flagpoles, planters, and signs. URBNDSN.MCA • • • ... • 6 TABLE 2 Project List Description 1. Signals a. Intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Franlo Road b. Intersection of Columbine Road and Prairie Center Drive c. Intersection of Singletree Lane and Prairie Center Drive d. Intersection of Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive e. Intersection of Plaza Drive and Prairie Center Drive f. Intersection of Plaza Drive and Valley View Road g. Intersection of Technology Drive and Mitchell Road h. Intersection of Fountain Place and T.R. 169 i. Ramp terminals at 1-494 and Valley View Road j. Ramp terminals at 1-494 and Prairie Center Drive 2. Medcom Boulevard Extension from Joiner Way to Franlo Road 3. West 78th Street, widened to four lanes from Prairie Center Drive to CSAR 18 4. Technology Drive, widened to four lanes from Prairie Center Drive to CSAR 169 5. Valley View Road improved to urban section and construct permanent creek crossing, northeast of Flying Cloud Drive 6. Columbine Road Extension to Prairie Center Drive 7. Singletree Lane widening and addition of tum lanes between Eden Road and T.R. 169 8. Leona Road reconstruction to provide new intersection with West 78th Street 9. City cost attributable to the MnDOT project to construct T.R. 212 between 1-494 and Mitchell Road 10. Water system improvements a. New 2,000,000 gallon elevated water storage b. 20" diameter trunk watermain extension between water plant and Prairie Center Drive 11. Permanent street lighting improvements in Major Center Area a. Prairie Center Drive f. West 78th Street b. Technology Drive g. Columbine Road c. Eden Road h. Plaza Drive e. Valley View Road 1. Singletree Lane 7 /JLj • • • • Phasing Areas /o5R 1\ 1£1\ 1 0 RAl\lJ) Ul\l TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of P(JIks, Recreation and Natural Resources~ DATE: January 2, 1992 SUBJECT: Review of Tax Increment Financing Project REQUEST: The City Council has requested that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission review the list of TIF Capital Projects that have been recommended for funding, and provide the City Council with other additional projects the City Council should consider prior to reviewing the approved list. BACKGROUND: Attached to this memo is a December 12, 1991 memorandum from Eugene Dietz, Director of Public Works, providing a status report on tax increment financing capital projects. Mr. Dietz points out that during the past twelve months a number of alternative spending plans have been discussed regarding utilization of tax increments collected in the Major Center Area. In order to make amendments to the tax increment financing plan, a public hearing must be held to adopt a specific project list. Karon Joyer, a previous member of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, served on the original TIF Committee that recommended the existing approved list. The City Council is considering making some changes to that list; however, Council members would like input from the commissions prior to finalizing the revisions. On page two of Mr. Dietz's memorandum Commission members will note there has been a significant number of changes to cash flow availability due to circumstances that occurred in 1991; however, the net balance after reviewing all of those changes is only a negative $18,600. The existing park and recreation related improvements included on the TIF list include the following: 1. Sidewalk and trail completion in the Southwest quadrant of the "ring road" along Prairie Center Drive between Trunk Highway 169 and West 78th street. 2. A trail around the perimeter of Lake Idlewild. • 3. A sidewalk along the east side of Topview Road between Roberts Drive and Valley View ~~. • • • • Review of Tax Financing Project December 31, 1991 Page 2 4. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area development and acquisition. CONSIDERATIONS: Additional items the Commission may want to consider suggesting for the tax increment fmancing project list include the following: 1. Acquisition of 1-2 acres of land along Lake Idlewild for a public park to provide picnicking and a green space area in the City Center. 2. Provide additional funds for streetscape and a "greenway connection" along Technology Drive from Prairie Center Drive to Mitchell Road. If the City Hall is to be located either at CPT or the vicinity of Technology Drive and Mitchell Road, Technology Drive will provide an important connection between the City Government Center and the "downtown area." A landscaped boulevard with trees, occasional flower beds and park benches between the Government Center and the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area entry would be great addition to that part of Eden Prairie. With the :MTS pond on the north side of the road and the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area open water feature on the south side of the road, Technology drive could attract many walkers, joggers, bicyclists, and in-line skaters, if the road is heavily landscaped and is the northern portion of the trail serving the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area, as well as Staring Lake Park. Commission members may wish to consider other landscape features in the Major Center Area that may be funded by the tax increment financing fund. RECOl\1MENDATION: All of the projects included in the TIF Capital Projects List are important projects to development of the Major Center Area and must be funded one way or another by the City of Eden Prairie; therefore, if projects are added to the list, some of the existing projects would have have to come off the list. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff would recommend the Commission consider acquisition of a small parcel of land on Lake Idlewild, as well as dedicating $200,000-$300,000 for improving the landscaping of Technology Drive. This would include lights, walkways, trees, flower beds and some irrigation. BL:mdd TIFI14 • • • TIME: EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL UNAPPROVED MINUTES Tuesday, January 7, 1992 LOCATION: City Hall Council Chambers 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Planning Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Recording Secretary Roberta Wick Present: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock. Absent: H. Martin Jessen I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda. Pidcock requested the addition of one item under Item X.A. Reports of Councilmembers: (2) Discussion on Choosing Banks as Repositories for City Funds. Jullie requested two items be added under X.D. Report of Director of Public Works: (1) Reschedule Discussion for Heritage Road Closure; (2) 1-494 Improvements. Jullie also said that on Item III.J. on the Consent Calendar, Resolution No. 92-08 included revised cash park fees. Agenda approved as amended 4-0. II. MINUTES A. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, November 26, 1991 (Continued from December 17, 1991) MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held Tuesday, November 26, 1991. Motion approved 4-0. Eden Prairie 2 City Council Minutes B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 3, 1991 (Continued from December 17, 1991) MOTION January 7, 1992 Unapproved Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the Council meeting held Tuesday, December 3, 1991. Pidcock requested a correction on Page 14 of the minutes, the fourth paragraph should read as follows: Tenpas said he believed it was necessary for the City to look at ways to decrease spending in this time of recession. Pidcock also said she believed that the discussion of Item X.A.1. Relationship between Staff, Council, and Mayor, Pages 8 through 11 of the minutes, had been drastically edited and condensed. She requested that future discussions of this type not be edited in this way and that more of the discussion appear in the minutes. Motion to approve minutes as amended approved 4-0. C. Workshop Meeting held Monday, December 9, 1991 (Continued from December 17,1991) MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve minutes of the Workshop Heeting held Monday, December 9, 1991. Motion approved 4-0. D. Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 10, 1991 MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 10, 1991. Motion approved 4-0. E. City Council "Truth In Taxation" Hearing held Tuesday, December 10, 1991 HOT ION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the City Council "Truth In Taxation" Hearing held Tuesday, December 10, 1991. Motion approved 4-0. IU} • • • • • • Eden Prairie City Council Minutes 3 January 7, 1992 Unapproved F. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 17! 1991 MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 17, 1991. Motion approved 4-0. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Final Plat Approval of Menard's 7th Addition (located north of Plaza Drive and east of Prairie Center Drive (Resolution No. 92-11) C. Approve Change Order No. 3 for Eden Hills, I.C. 52-212 D. Set Date for 1992 Local Board of Review for Thursday, April 16, 1992 at 7:30 PM E. Resolution No. 92-01, Designating the Official City Newspaper F. Resolution No. 92-021 Authorizing City Officials to Transact Banking Business G. Resolution No. 92-03 1 Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials H. Resolution No. 92-041 Designating Depositories I. Resolution No. 92-051 Authorizing the Treasurer to Invest City of Eden Prairie Funds J. Resolution No. 92-081 Regulating Fees and Charges for Business License Permits and Municipal Services MOTION Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion approved 4-0. /03 Eden Prairie City Council Minutes IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4 January 7, 1992 Unapproved A. BRAXTON POND by Westar Properties, Inc. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 3.6 acres; Adoption of Resolution 91-248, Preliminary Plat of 3.6 acres into six single-family lots and road right-of-way with variance to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals to be known as Braxton Pond. Location: south and west of the terminus of existing Braxton Drive. (Ordinance 32- 91 -Zoning District Change; Resolution 91-248 -Preliminary Plat) Continued from December 17, 1991 MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to continue this item until January 21, 1992. Motion approved 4-0. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve payment of claims. • Motion for payment of claims approved with Anderson, Harris, Pidcock, • and Tenpas voting "AYE". VI. ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS A. 1st and 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 1-92 amending Section 5.40 of the City Code Relating to Lawful Gambling Jullie said this was a request for a change in the City Code to allow continuation of lawful gambling at the American Legion Club building. The change would allow lawful gambling on premises leased to an organization provided lawful gambling had occurred on those premises prior to November 1, 1989. Other changes proposed in this ordinance would bring the City Code into conformance with State Code. MOTION Harris moved to approve first reading of Ordinance No. 1-92 amending Section 5.40 of the City Code Relating to Lawful Gambling. Seconded by Anderson. Motion approved 4-0. • • • • Eden Prairie 5 City Council Minutes VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS January 7, 1992 Unapproved VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS. & COMMITTEES IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Lower Minnesota River Watershed District -Recommendation of Eden Prairie Resident to fill and expired three-year term on the Lower Minnesota Watershed District beginning March 23, 1992 Jullie said the City had the opportunity to recommend a candidate to the Hennepin County Board to fill a vacancy on the Lower Minnesota Watershed District. The term would begin ~1arch 23, 1992. MOTION Anderson moved to recommend William Turkula for this appointment. Seconded by Harris. Harris asked if there was any way to insure that the City was represented on the Watershed District Boards. Jullie said that the City had recommended to the County Board that each City be represented on any watershed districts within its boundaries. Fully meeting this intent could require a change in the number of representatives on some Watershed District Boards, but he said he believed this would be an appropriate change. Anderson said he supported Mr. Turkula for the appointment but would like the opportunity to interview him. It was Council consensus that Mr. Turkula be interviewed one-half hour before the meeting scheduled for January 14, 1992, so that the recommendation could be made at the next regular Council meeting on January 21, 1991. B. Resolution No. 92-06. Designating the Official Meeting Dates, Time and Place for the City of Eden Prairie Council in 1992 and Appointing an Acting Mayor MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 92-06 appointing Richard Anderson as acting mayor, and setting 7:30 PM- 11:00 PM on the first and third Tuesday of each month for regular City Council meetings, while reserving all other Tuesdays for any necessary special meetings. Motion approved 4-0. / I /\ [. t U Eden Prairie City Council Minutes 6 January 7, 1992 Unapproved C. Resolution No. 92-07, Designating a Director and Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for 1992 MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 92-07 appointing John Frane and Richard Anderson as Director and Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for 1992. Motion approved 4-0. D. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities -Appointment of 1 Representative and 4 Alternates MOTION Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to appoint the Mayor as the representative to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, with the other four Councilmembers as alternates. Motion approved 4-0. E. Appointment of City Attorney for 1992 MOTION • Anderson moved the appointment of Lang, Pauly, Gregerson Ltd. as • City Attorney for 1992. Seconded by Pidcock. Motion approved 4-0. x. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. City Manager Performance Review Harris said each Councilmember had reviewed the City Manager's performance against traditional standards established several years ago, as well as against goals which had been established jointly at the beginning of 1991. She said there was consensus that the City Manager had maintained appropriate demeanor and exercised good judgment, but there had been considerable spread and disagreement regarding the City Manager's assertiveness as it related to preparing recommendations on policy and proposing future direction for the City. The overall score for that particular section was 3.16. III • • • • Eden Prairie 7 City Council Minutes January 7, 1992 Unapproved Concerning City Council relationship, there was support for the City Manager in his relations and interactions with the Council. There was general agreement that the City Manager had shared critical information in a timely and appropriate fashion, that he followed up on requests in a timely and responsive manner, and presentation of the City budget was accomplished within the established time period. The overall score for this section was 3.52. As to City staff relationships, she pointed out that the Council was removed from the day-to-day operations of the City and therefore the Council's evaluation of this section was predicated in part by distance. However, the impressions were that in the management of fiscal affairs, the City Manager had done a good job as demonstrated by the annual audit report and the excellent bond rating the City had achieved. This score had been 4.0. On setting goals for staff and measuring performance, the overall score had been 3.75. As to maintaining effective personnel policies and procedures to insure equitable and fair treatment for all employees, the Council scored the Manager 2.38. Overall score for the section was 3.54. There was a consensus that community relations was a strength of the City Manager. Overall score for that section was 3.5. She then discussed the Manager's performance against 1991 goals. There was unanimous opinion that the City Manager had successfully initiated a total quality management program with City staff with a 4.0 score on this section. The City Manager had been requested" to prepare a Multi-Year Capital Improvement Plan for 1991 and had met that goal. The score for that was 3.4. Efforts to control personnel costs through effective planning were demonstrated through the reduction of positions and the score for this was 3.8. The commitment to the Council's request to pursue additional training was properly discharged with an overall score of 4.0. The overall score for the entire section was 3.61. There were areas that the Council believed the Manager should continue to work to improve. She then related several comments which were taken verbatim from individual evaluations. Overall, in the development area, there was a recognition that there had been great strides in the progress of management practices over the past year and the Manager should be commended, particularly for the Quality Management Program currently being implemented in the City. II? Eden Prairie 8 City Council Minutes January 7, 1992 Unapproved The conclusions of the overall evaluation were: (1) That the average score was 3.51, with an individual scoring range of 2.45 to 4.26. The summary statement was that the City Manager's job performance met the established expectations overall, and that in some areas there was demonstrable above-average effort. There were some themes that were important looking ahead to 1992: First, that there had been progress since the last evaluation; and secondly, there was a general consensus that there needed to be more assertive leadership in terms of City direction, and that the Manager be more aggressive as to participating in the Council discussions, preparing information, suggestions as to direction, and promoting ideas. Tenpas said he believed the review that he and Harris had held with the City Manager had been positive and had left everyone optimistic about 1992. Jullie said he agreed with this assessment. Harris said she and Tenpas had some recommendations that would govern the evaluation process for 1992. A. Establish dates for the performance year that reflect the City's business. The suggestion was that November 1 be established as the date for City Manager review, with the review year running from October 31-November 1 each year. B. That annual goals be established with the City Manager and these goals be used as the basis for measuring the Manager's performance. C. The City Manager's performance review should be used as the basis for determining salary action, but the two activities should remain separate. The salary action would not necessarily take place at the time of the performance review. D. Council consider a mid-year consultation with the City Manager to discuss the progress being made on the goals and objectives in order to avoid any misunderstanding or address any unmet expectation. Tenpas requested that Councilmembers and the City Manager submit goals by January 14, 1992, so that four or five goals could be chosen for the next City Manager evaluation, and that the mid-year evaluation be set for June 1, 1992. It was also agreed that a salary adjustment discussion for the City Manager be held at the January 21, 1992 meeting. • • • • • • Eden Prairie 9 City Council Minutes January 7, 1992 Unapproved 2. Discussion on Choosing Banks as Repository for City Funds Pidcock said she would like the City to consider using local banks for depositing City funds. She believed it would be fair to consider Century Bank and First State Bank which were locally-owned banks. She also believed there should also be some guidelines established for choosing banks. Jullie said that First Bank had been one of the City's banking institutions for several years. He said the Finance Department had a goal of preparing a request for proposals with criteria on rates within the next six months so the City could compare rates and information on opportunities for savings. Appropriate adjustment could be made after this information was available. B. Report of City Manager 1. 2. Set Time and Place for City Council/Staff Workshop to be held Monday, January 27, 1992 Jullie said that the College of St. Thomas had indicated that it would match the rates charged by the Spring Hill Center for this workshop. Council consensus was that St. Thomas was more accessible and therefore preferable. Council agreed to meet at 6:00 PM at St. Thomas for dinner, with the meeting to begin at 6:30 PM on Monday, January 27, 1991. Set Tuesday, February 11. 1992. 6:00 PM to Interview and Appoint Candidates for Boards and Commissions Council agreed to meet on this date and time to interview and appoint candidates for boards and commissions. 3. Set Tuesday, January 14, 1992, 7:30 PM, to discuss the Park Bond Referendum and 2nd Ice Rink Lambert said this meeting was necessary to make some decisions regarding the Park Bond Referendum scheduled for Spring 1992. Council agreed to meet with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on this date. / ILl i Eden Prairie 10 City Council Minutes January 7, 1992 Unapproved 4. Discussion of Municipal Legislative Commission's 1992 Legislative Program Jullie said staff would like Council discussion and direction on the Municipal Legislative Commission's proposed 1992 Legislative Program. Harris said that while she agreed with the proposals in the report, she noted that there was not always agreement with proposals received from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, and was concerned how everything would come together at the State Legislature. Jullie said that the AMM and the League of Cities were generic organizations; because the t-funicipal Legislative Commission was geared specifically to the concerns of suburban communities, he believed this organization would best serve the needs of the City. He said additional discussion had also been held regarding the commercial/industrial tax rate, and the MLC recommended that no drop in this classification rate be recommended as such action would result in an additional burden being shifted to residential properties. It also was pointed out that the commercial/industrial rate was being effectively reduced by the drop in valuation of commercial property. Pidcock said she believed the MLC had done a good job in lobbying the Legislature on behalf of the City. Tenpas stated that MLC was the only effective voice the City had with the Legislature. MOTION Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to support the report from the Municipal Legislative Commission. Motion approved 4-0. c. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resource D. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Reschedule Discussion for Heritage Road Closure Dietz said that a request had been received from a representative of the Heritage Road neighborhood to continue the discussion on the potential closure of Heritage Road from the scheduled date of January 21, 1992, to February 4, 1992. He said a neighborhood informational meeting would be held on January 23, 1992 at Immanuel Lutheran Church and residents of the neighborhood would be invited by letter to attend. • • • • • • Eden Prairie 11 City Council Minutes January 7, 1992 Unapproved 2. 1-494 Improvements Dietz said that the public hearings for the 1-494 Draft Environmental Impact Statement would be held in the near future. Exact dates had not yet been determined. MnDOT and its consultant, BRW, were proposing a round of briefing sessions for each of the cities involved. The scheduled date for Eden Prairie was February 4, 1992. He said MnDOT had a 15-to-20- minute presentation on the subject and its presentation could possibly fit into the Council meeting, or it could be held at a separate time. Council consensus was to include the HnDOT presentation as part of the February 4, 1992 Council meeting. XI. OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn at 8:30 PH. t-lotion approved 4-0 . II f.p • • • CITY OF E~EN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST January 21, 1992 CONTRACTOR (r~UL TI FAMIL Y & CO;~t1.) Alert Electric, Inc. Associated Mechanical Contractors Ber-l~all, Inc. The Fendler Company Hauenstein & Burmeister, Inc. Hoeft Builders, Inc. Knutson Construction Company Lesterls of r1i nnesota, Inc. Northco Corporation Norhtwest Racquet Club Rosemount, Inc. Ryan Construction Co. of i1inn. Tim's Tower Service Welsh Construction PLUMBING Leon Duda Plumbing Matthew Daniels, Inc . Easco Plumbing & Heating Figner Plumbing Company Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Gilbert Mechanical Hanson-Kleven Plumbing Harris Mechanical Contracting Hovde Plumbing & Heating Jerry's Plumbing Lakeside Plumbing & Heating Randy Lane & Sons Plumbing LeVahn Boothers Marsh Plumbing & Heating Mevissen Plumbing Minnesota Plumbing & Heating Northern Plumbing & Heating Piper Pl umbing, Inc. Pri del1echan i ca 1 Ridgedale Plumbers Roto-Rooter Services State Mechanical, Inc. Thompson Plumbing Voson Plumbing, Inc. Wi dmer, Inc. Zachman Plumbing 1/1 GAS FITTER Diversified Mechanical Services Centra i re, Inc. Economy Gas Installers, Inc. Flare Heating & Air Conditioning Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Harris Mechanical Contracting Heating & Cooling Two, Inc. Hovde Plumbing & Heating Home Energy Center Lakeside Plumbing & Heating Randy Lane & Sons Plumbing & Heating Minnegasco, Inc. Minnesota Plumbing & Heating Piper Plumbing, Inc. Thermex Corporation Thompson Plumbing Wenzel Heating & Air Conditioning HEATING & VENTILATING Alber's Sheetmetal & Ventilating AIdo, Inc. Allan Mechanical, Inc. Centrairie, Inc. Diversified Mechanical Services Dronen's Heating & Air Conditioning Flare Heating & Air Conditioning Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co. Heating & Cooling Two, Inc. Home Energy Center Master Mechanical, Inc. Minnesota Plumbing & Heating Palm Brothers, Inc. Sunburst Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Thermex Corooration Wenzel Heat~ng & Air Conditioning UTIL lTV INSTALLER Roto-Rooter Services Company State Mechanical, Inc. Thomoson Plumbing Widmer Incorporated United Water & Sewer Company CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST page two SEPTIC SY:3TEMS Bohn Well Drilling Co., Inc. Sullivan's Services, Inc. SCAVENGER Roto-Rooter Services Company WATER SOFTENER Culligan Water Service Company Minnesota Plumbing & Heating "TYPE B FOOD Glen Lake Optimists TYPE C FOOD Eden Prairie Grocery Tom Thumb Store 275 Tom Thumb Store 269 PRIVATE KE~NEL • REFUSE HAULER Robert O'Connor -7Q41 Willow Creek Rd. Aagard Sanitation Browning Ferris Industries Buckingham Disposal, Inc. Quality Waste Control Randy's Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. 3.2 BEER OFF SALE Eden Prairie Grocery FOOD VEHICLE Bringers MECHANICAL GAMES Saei d Bas i ri Carousel of Des Moines, Inc. Gina Maria's Pizza CIGARETTE ARAServices Saei d Bas i ri Eden Prairie Grocery These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity Gvufk Pat So 1 i el Licensing ,fb • • " • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources FROM: c#: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: December 31, 1991 SUBJECT: Tax-Forfeited Property Attached is list number 773-NC, a list of non conservation located in Eden Prairie, which has been pronounced tax-forfeit to the State of Minnesota for non payment of property taxes. As provided in Minnesota State Status 282, the County has requested the City to either approve the parcels for public auction, approve sale to adjacent property owners, or request conveyance to the City for public use. The list includes five parcels of property which are currently tax delinquent. • The full description for these parcels is as follows: • 1 2 3 4 5 PIN Description 10-116-22-23-0239 Village Greens Condominiums Garage Number 15 10-116-22-23-0240 Village Greens Condominiums Garage Number 16 15-116-22-14-0001 Unplatted Property in Section 15 23-116-22-14-0024 Preserve Center 3rd Addition Lot 2, Block 1 25-116-22-33-0003 Part of Outlot I in the SW 114 of Section 25 RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending Specials None None None Prepaid $1,403.53 None The staff has reviewed the five parcels of this list and taken a look at potential usage of any of the parcels for public purposes. The consensus of the staff is that the parcels be disposed of in the following manner: !/9 " '. Tax Forfeited Property December 31, 1991 Page 2 \ . .. :~ OFFERED FOR SALE TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: Parcels Number 1 and 2, are garage units in the Village Green Condominium Association property. The Council might recall the letter in October petitioning the City to put up other garages that have been tax forfeit with the contingency that they be sold to adjacent property owners. It is apparent that there are still some problems and I've spoken with the management firm and informed them of this most recent tax forfeiture. DEEDED TO THE CITY -Parcels Number 3,4 & 5: Parcel Number 3 is a small parcel of land located adjacent to land which the City already owns in the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. Parcel Number 4 is located on the corner of Preserve Boulevard and Anderson Lakes Parkway. Because of the wet and poor bearing conditions of the soils in this lot, the staff recommends that this parcel be picked up for conservation purposes. • Parcel Number 5 is located adjacent to Purgatory Creek and acquisition of this parcel would be in conformity with the acquisition and donation of property adjacent to the creek south of Country Road 1. • City staff recommends the Council approve Resolution No. 92-12 authorizing the disposal of these tax-forfeited lands as outlined above. SAF:mdd taxmemo/stu • I~O • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-12 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF TAX-FORFEITED LAND WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has received from the County of Hennepin Non Conservation List 773-NC, which lists 5 (five) properties in said municipality which have become property of the State of Minnesota for non payment of real estate taxes, Oist attached), and WHEREAS, provided in Minnesota Status 282, the City Council is asked to determine the disposal of these parcels of land, and WHEREAS, the City can approve the parcels for public auction, or approve the parcels sale to adjacent owners, or request conveyance to the City for public use without monetary consideration, or request that parcels be withheld from public auction for one year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City of Eden Prairie does request the Board of Hennepin County to approve the disposal of these parcels in the following way: 1. Parcels offered for sale to adjacent property owners: PIN -10-116-22-22-0239 -with no special assessments pending PIN -10-116-22-23-0240 -with no special assessments pending 2. Parcels to be conveyed to City for public use: PIN -15-116-22-14-0001 -with no special assessments pending PIN -23-116-22-14-0024 -with no special assessments pending PIN -25-116-22-33-0003-with no special assessments pending ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21st day of January, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk SEAL I;A( . , ~I\ • RUN DATEI 11114/91 SC THP RG QQ SFXI PROPERTY ADDRESS fo.~CEL I 10-116-22 23 0239 ",-1'-. ARCe: L Z. 10-116;::22 23 0240 ) ~~E'L3 . 15-116-22 14 0001 lOT BlK 61 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED )A~e.E"L. ~ 23-116-22 14 0024 002 001 8928 PRESERVE BLVD ) ,.-25-116-22 33 0003 JO.e.C.£L.':) 61 ADDRESS ltIASSIGNED TOTAL NUHBER OF ACCOUNTS BY HUNIC S • LIST 773-NC HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM lIST OF FORFEITED PROPERTY PREVIOUS OHNER/DESCRIPTION EDEN PRAIRIE E & P ASSOCIATES CONDOMINIUM NO. 0516 VILLAGE GREENS CONDOMINIUM UNIT NO GIS E & P ASSOCIATES CONDOMINIUM NO. 0516 VILLAGE GREENS CONDOMINIUM UNIT NO G16 BERMEL-SMABY DEVEL CO UNPLATTED 15 116 22 .' COM AT SE COR OF NE 1&4 TH H 99 FT . ALONG TIlE S LINE THEREOF TH NELY' TO A PT IN THE E LINE THEREOF DIS 33 FT N FROM BEG TH S TO BEG PRESERVE OF EDEN PRIARIE INC PRESERVE CENTER 3RD ADDITION DATE OF DATE OF JUDGEMENT FORFEItURE 04/18188 08/29/91 04/18/88 08/22/91 04/18/88 05/16/91 04/18/88 08/29/91 ELIZABETH C BRYAN 04/18/88 08/15/91 BLUFFS WEST THAT PART OF OUTLOT I EMBRACED HI THIN THE SH 1/4 OF SEC 25 REPORT 'NO: PI421101 PAGE 26 BLDG VALUE 2.400 2,400 HKT VALUE 2.500 2,500 200 40,800 3,200 • c< ~ - • c: z _'J .~ "', 0- ~ .. ,:,"'. "-, ';'"', i' . ' '&-41 " r-, ~, , r t- Z :::> 0 u -------.------\ i I , I \ c.\\ \ J {.6" trr1 op~ .,. (3) I / 1 :/ \ / II o ... '" tN I I .u:.o' ~ l'A~£L"'~ ~ ,1$ -"1.-2'1" ,4· 0001 fI \ ~ __ ---:-+~ ____ ~~:::.:...-....:.... ~_----~L-.--(1) __ -........ 'l~ . , . , .,'? : , , -, --. - '" OUTLOT" (67) .......... : . ..... ~ ... : ... rr" IT I AT "') OUTLOT A ( I) . ~~-; :~f~~~~ ~(? ~ ~~~ .... ' ..... "PA'2.t!.£t.-4 26"36. "36 RfS 2~1'II·Z:z.· 14--002.. tN /,0." ZOO I -r- I. I 1 '" I . -..1 (4) ~\tJ • .. .' • . ( 10) 21 • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-26 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING FEBRUARY 1992 AS "EDEN PRAIRIE LOVES ITS KIDS" MONTH WHEREAS, All of the children of the City of Eden Prairie from the infants born or adopted this day, to toddlers, preschoolers, nursery school kids, kindergarten kids, elementary kids, kids in junior high school, students at Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and Hopkins High Schools, all private school students, and out-of-school youth are deserving of recognition and support, and WHEREAS, the goal of this community is an honest effort to raise self-esteem and to reach the kids in our city who have had too many struggles in their young lives, and further, that the kids who are achieving success should be highly complimented for their accomplishments, and WHEREAS, every citizen has a duty to report any suspicions of child abuse, the selling of alcoholic beverages to minors, or the selling of drugs to our kids, by reporting those suspicions to the Eden Prairie Police Department (949-6200), and WHEREAS, gifts of love and expressions such as hugs, smiles, pats on the back, or loving words of expression and encouragement should flow freely to help our kids become confident and successful. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota to hereby officially proclaim the month of February 1992 as "Eden Prairie Loves Its Kids" month or ("E P Loves Its Kids" month). AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that every resident, parent, church, school, community club organization, employer and business establishment in Eden Prairie is encouraged to take an active part in "Eden Prairie Loves Its Kids" month. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 21st day of January, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Councilmembers THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Natalie J. Swaggert, Director Human Resources & Community Services DATE: January 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Submission of State required Pay Equity Implementation Report State law requires that each jurisdiction submit a Pay Equity Implementation Report to the Department of Employee Relations (DOER) by January 31, 1992. The report will be evaluated by the DOER to determine if the jurisdiction is in compliance with the State Pay Equity Act. Attached is a copy of the City of Eden Prairie's Pay Equity Implementation Report. The report reflects the City's hierarchy of positions and salary practices as of December 31, 1991. The State requires that the report be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to submission. At the time we submit the report we are required to inform employees that the Pay Equity Implementation Report has been filed and make it available to interested individuals. We must also provide copies to the Local 49 Business Representative and the public library. The DOER will process our data, as submitted, to determine if the City has reached compliance. They expect to return the results to us in a number of months. pb: m-DOER report * For most job classes movement through the range is based on merit and there is no set number of years to the range maximum. At this time there are • no female job classes which have a set number of years to maximum. Because of this, it is not mathematically possible to perform the salary range test. • • Pay Equity Implementation Report Submit by January 31, 1992 to: • c e =c ~e '0-.~c :J~ ,; Pay Equity Coordinator Department of Employee Relations 200 Centennial Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul. MN 55155 (612-296-2653) Name of Jurisdiction City of Eden Prairie (]I City 0 County Address For Department Use Only Postmark Date of Report Jurisdiction ID Number 0 School 0 Other: •• C 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 <Q) t~ Contact PeIson I PhO~(612) q17 -/?h? c CI.. Na ta 1 i e Swajlgert 0 C e =s ~ :c Q) > '0 1) E • E) C CI.. @ 0 .. ~ Q) U c C)~ t-CQ) CCC~ Q"U)Q:: -;;-c ....... -CDt:CD C to-C U Q5~~t: ~~~ I:\. U 01 0 >< t: "t: ... OCD ~I:\. a t ... c ~ Q" CI.. The job evaluation system used measured skill. effort 0 No ranges/performance differences. Check one: responsibility and working conditions and the same 0 system was used for all classes of employees. This jurisdiction does not have salary ranges for any of Its Check one of the following: classes. Documentation about performance differ- ences Is available upon request to explain apparent 0 state Job Match Inequities between male and female classes. 0 Designed Own (specify) [) This Item does not apply to this Jurisdiction. [) 0 An official notice has been posted at Consultant's System (specify) PDI-Focas City Hall Offices 0 Other (specify) (prominent location) Informing employees that the Pay Equity Implementation Report has been filed and Is available to employees upon Benefits for male and female classes of comparable request. Also. a copy of the report has been sent to each exclusive representative. If any. and a copy has been made value have been evaluated and: available In the public library. The report was approved by: (]I There Is no difference and female classes are not City Counc; 1 at a disadvantage. (governing body) o There Is a difference and the maximum salaries reported Include the monthly amount paid by the Douglas B. Tenpas employer for health insurance. (chief elected official. print) Information In this report Is complete and accurate. The report Includes all classes of employees over (chief elected offICial. signature) which the jurisdiction has final budgetary approval Mayor authority. (tine) (date) Result from Salary Range Worksheet -NA-*(See attached Explanation) % is the result after average years to salary range maximum for male classes is divided by the average years to salary range maximum for female classes. Results from Exceptional Service Pay Worksheet [) Less than 20% of male classes receive ESP. % is the result from the worksheet (percentage of female classes receiving ESP is divided by the percentage of male classes receiving ESP). $ 8,279,256.41 is the annual payroll for 1991. (Part F on Back) I "'1 r~\ .,\ l J PART f: Job Class Infon.ation Cit~ of Eden Prairie (Name,of Jurisdiction) 7600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Phone (612) 937-2262 To convert hourly rate to monthly, (Address) multiply rate 173.3 A B C D E F G Number of Number of Class Comparable Minimum Maximum Male female -Type Work Value Monthly Monthly Class Title-Employees Employees M, f, B (Job points) Salary Salary 1. Car~a~her_ _F __ ~_J ___ $ 780 $ 953 2. ~ru::es!':illD-Worker ~ _F ~ __ 1 __ $ 780 $ 953 3. Comm Ctr CashlerLRaceot ------_._-~ __ 3 __ F 5 $ 910 $ 1,300 4. Comm Ctr Maintenance -----~---------.-M __ 5 __ $ 910 $ 1,300 5. 1illstadial-.Ass't __ .2 M 5 $ 910 $ 1,126 6. linOllLClerk -~ _ --.A _6 5 $ 910 $ 1,300 7. .Custadia"-_ 3 B 10 $ 1,269 $ 1,457 8. Sr I iOllor Clerk ___ 1 ___ M --~-- ~_10 __ $ 1,269 $_1,457 9. Animal Cani[al Assist5!ot M 20 $ 1,438 $ 1,697 10 • .-BldCLlns~c Clerk ____ F 20 $ 1,438 $ 1,697 11. Cle[k Receptionist II F 20 $ 1,438 $ 1,697 12. BIH,IIPIiQOistLQul2lication Clerk 2 F 20 $ 1,438 $ 1,697 13. Bfls<IIPliQoistlSwitchboard F 20 $ 1,438 $ 1,697 14. Secretarv/~_lil!tionis~ ________ 1 F 20 $ 1,438 $ 1,697 15. AS;S;QI.IDliDg QI!il[~ F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 16. Animal Co111rQL Officer L M 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 Please ~ke additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: Faith Zwemke, Oepartment of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOMP \-J ~J f". .' • Date 1-17-92 Page 1 of 7 H I J Years # Years Exceptional to J2J: of Service .J1aL Service Pay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • PART F: J~S Info~tion City of Eden Prairie (Name of Jurisdiction) 1'600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Phone (612) 937-2262 To convert hourly rate to monthly, (Address) multiply rate 173.3 A B C D E r G Number of Class Comparable Minimum Maximum Female Type Work Value Monthly Monthly EmD]Oyee~ H.-L..a (Job Points) Salary Salary Class Ii tl e' 1. Aquatics Supervisor M 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 2. Assessing Clerk F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 3. Assistant Store Manager 3 M 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 4. Community Center Clerical 2 F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 5. Community Service Officer 2 F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 6. Licensing Clerk F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 7. M,T. Tech I M 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 8. Records Technician 2 F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 9. Seretary II-Dept. 5 F 30 $ 1,631 $ 1,974 10. Telecommunicator 2 4 B 30 $ 1,733 $ 1,906 11. Animal Control Officer M 40 $ 1,851 $ 2,294 12. Instrument Person M 40 $ 1,851 $ 2,294 13. Lead Telecommunicator F 40 $ 1,851 $ 2,294 14. Main!. Worker (D) 29 M 40 $ 1,875 $ 2,289 15. Main!. Worker (E) 7 M 40 $ 1,875 $ 2,364 16. Secretary III-Dept. 3 F 40 $ 1,851 $ 2,294 Please ~ke additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOMP \..) .,.~j \-J Date • .--_92 __ _ Page 2 of 7 H I J Years (I Years Exceptional to 2!: of Service J1a2L Service Pay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .4 4 0 PART r: Job Class Infon.ation Cit~ of Eden Prairie (Name of Jurisdiction) 7600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Phone (612) 937-2262 To convert hourly rate to monthly, (Address) mult i pl y rate 173.3 A B C D E f G Number of Number of Class Comparable Minimum Maximum Male female Type Work Value Monthly Monthly Class Ii t1e, Employees Employees H, f. B (Job points) Salary Salary 1. Seecial Assessment Clerk F 40 $ 1,851 $ 2,294 2. Utilit~ Billing Clerk F 40 $ 1,851 $ 2,294 3. Assessing Assistant F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 4. Bldg, Inse, Lead Secreta~ F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 5. Communications/Comeenstation Specialist M 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 6. Communi~ Center Lead Secretary F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 7. Crime Prevention Specialist F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 8. Elections Coordinator F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 9. Engineering Tech. 2 M 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 10. Executive Secretary F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 11. Mechanic 4 M 50 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 12. Mechanic Operator 3 M 50 $ 2,499 $ 2,499 13. Payroll/Elections Clerk F 50 $ 2,100 $ 2,667 14. Plant Operator 4 M 50 $ 2,409 $ 2.409 15. Senior Accounting Clerk F 50 $ 2,100 $, 2,667 16. Engineering Tech II 2 M 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 --------.-- Please nake additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, HN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOMP I ,j .I \" • • Date 1-17-92 Page 3 of 7 H I J Years II Years Exceptional to l2.!: of Service ~ _Sel"'lice Pay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 ,2 0 0 • • City of Eden Prairie (Name,of Jurisdiction) 7600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 (Address) A Class Title, 1. Foreman 2. Fraud Invest CSO Coordinator 3. Historical Interpreter 4. Maint.lCust Supv. 5. Mgr., Liquor Store 6. Outdoor Center Coordinator 7. Planning Asst. 8. Real Estate Appraiser 9. Records Supervisor 10. Senior Crime Prevention Specialist 11. Accountant II 12. Building Inspector 13. Community Center Operations Supervisor 14. Corporal 15. Fire Inspector 16. Fire Marshal B Number of Male Employees 4 2 2 2 6 2 2 PART f: JO~S Info~tion Phone (612) 937-2262 To convert hourly rate to monthly, multiply rate 173.3 C D E F G Class Comparable Minimum Maximum Type Work Value Monthly Monthly H . ..£....Jl (Job Pojnts) Salary Salary M 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 F 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 M 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 M 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 M 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 M 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 F 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 M 60 $ 2,385 $, 3,099 F 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 F 60 $ 2,385 $ 3,099 F 70 $ 2,868 $ 3,814 M 70 $ 2,705 $ 3,599 M 70 $ 2,868 $ 3,814 B 70 $ 3,541 $ 3,541 M 70 $ 2,705 $ 3,599 M 70 $ 2,868 $ 3,814 Please ~ke additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, HN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOHP \'-J ,-.} " H Years to .J1aL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QJ: Date ._-9~2~ __ Page 4 of 7 I J # Years Exceptional of Service Service Pay 9 PART f: Job Class Infon.ation City of Eden Prairie (Name of Jurisdiction) .. 7600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Phone (612) 937-2262 To convert hourly rate to monthly, (Address) multiply rate 173.3 A B C D E F G Number of Number of Class Comparab1 e Minimum Maximum Male fema1 e Type Work Value Monthly Monthly Class Title, Employees Employees H, F. B (Job Points) Salary Salary 1. Investiaator 6 M 70 $ 2,289 $ 3,391 2. .PArsanm~1 Reo. 1 L_ 70 $ 2 1705 $ 3,599 3. PI:m Check EngioaarLEacili~ Manag~[ M 70 $ 2 1868 $ 3,814 4. PI",o.Reviewer M 70_ $ 2,705 $~599 5. E!laooer II 4 B 70 $ 2,868 $ 3,814 6. eQlic~ Officer 24 2 M 70 $ 2,289 $ 3,391 7. .Real Estate Aooraiser " 2 B 70 $ 2,705 $ 3,599 8. Recreatioo Supervisor" 2 2 B 70 $ 2,868 $. 3,814 9. Safelll lospactc[ M 70 $ 2,705 $ 3,599 10. SaoiCI EngiDluuing I~!<b 4 M 70 $ 2,705 $ 3,599 11. Sergeant 5 M 70 $ 3,790 $ 3,790 12. ...StafLEnaineer F 70 $ 2,868 $ 3,814 13. SuparvisQ[ ea[k Main! M 70 $ 2,868 $ 3,814 14. .Assistant to the City Enaineer M 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 15. Assistan1 11:! lba Qi~ Manager M 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 16. Finance OooraliQn.s .Manaae_r __ . F 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 Please ~ke additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOHP :-; ~f' • • Date 1-17-92 Page 5 of 7 H I J Years # Years Exceptional to Q£ of Service J1aL Seryice . Pay 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 • • PART f: JO~S Infor.ation City of Eden Prairie (Name,of Jurisdiction) 7600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 Phone (612) 937-2262 To convert hourly rate to monthly, (Address) multiply rate 173.3 A B C D E F G Number of Number of Class Comparabl e Minimum Maximum Male Femal e Type Work Value Monthly Monthly Class Title, EmDlUef.S. Employees H. f. B (Job points) Salary Sal ary 1. Lieutenant 2 M 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 2. Manager Parks & Natural Resources M 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 3. Manager Support Services M 80 $ 3,424 1 $ 4,622 4. Park Planner F 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 5. Senior Planner M 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 6. Superintendent 2 M 80 $ 3,424 $ 4,622 7. City Engineer M 90 $ 3,904 $ 5,350 8. Director of Assessing M 90 $ 3,904 $ 5,350 9. Manager of Recreation & Special Services F 90 $ 3,904 $ 5,350 10. Director of Finance M 100 $ 4,452 $ 6,189 11. Director of Human Resources/Services F 100 $ 4,452 $ 6,189 12. Director of Inspections, Safe~ & Facilities M 100 $ 4,452 $ 6,189 13. Director of Parks, Rec. & Nat. Res. M 100 $ 4,452 $ 6,189 14. Director of Planning M 100 $ 4,452 $ 6,189 IS. Police Chief M 100 $ 4,452 $ 6,189 16. Director of Public Works M 110 $ 5,078 $ 7,161 Please ~ke additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOMP .. .) -.) .::r: '. Oat. -1-92 e 6 of 7 H I J Years # Years Exceptional to QJ: of Service ~ Service Pay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Eden Prairie (Name,of Jurisdiction) 7600 Executive Drive (Address) Eden Prairie, Mn 55344 (Address) A Class Title, 1. Qitl/ Manaaer 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. B Number of Male Employees PART F: Job Class Infor.ation Phone (612) 937-2262 C Number of Fema1 e Employees D Class Type H. f. B M E Comparable Work Value (Job ~oiDtsl 120 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ To convert hourly rate to monthly, multiply rate 173.3 F G Minimum Maximum Monthly Monthly ~ Silin 5,792 $ 8,282 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $. $ Please ~ke additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction. Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, HN 55155 Questions: Call (612)296-2653 50WPPCOMP Ii ",,) r~ .' • H Years to QJ: J!.a1L o Date 1-17-92 Page 7 of 7 I # Years of Service • J Excepti onal Service Pay • • • TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Carl J. Jullie, city Manager Joyce D. Provo ~ January 17, 1992 City Council Joint Meetings with Boards/commissions The following dates have been set aside for the Council to meet I with advisory boards/commissions: March 17, 1992 April 7, 1992 May 19, 1992 June 2, 1992 July 7, 1992 August 4, 1992 September 1, 1992 Flying Cloud Airport Advisory commission Board of Appeals , Adjustments Planning Commission Parks, Recreation , Natural Resources commission Human Rights , Services commission Historical , cultural Commission waste Management commission All the joint meetings will be set for 6:00 PM with dinners provided. The meetings will last no longer than 7:30 PM as that is the time when the regularly scheduled Council meetings will begin. ' Recommendation: Recommend that the Council adopt the above schedule to meet with boards/commissions. • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning SUBJECT: Touch of Class DATE: January 14, 1992 BACKGROUND: Request: Variance 88-51, Touch of Class To permit 70% wood siding and 30% glass exterior siding. City Code requires 75% acceptable masonry/glass and no more than 25% Wood/stucco, vinyl, metal or plastic in the Office Zoning District. 1. Rezoning of property from Rural to Office --1986. 2. Variance requested for 100% wood/glass exterior building material. Board aQQroved 60% masonry/glass and 40% wood on 6/12/86. Variance #86-10 3. Variance requested for 100% wood/glass exterior building material. Board denied on 5/14/87. Variance #87-25 4. Board again awroved the variance to permit 60% masonry/glass and 40% wood on 6/11187. Variance #87-35 5. Variance #87-35 not utilized in one year time limit. 6. Variance requested submitted for 70% wood siding and 30% glass exterior. Same request as 100% wood/glass only percentage breakdown. Board denied on 11110/88. Variance #88-51. 7. Touch of Class petitions City Council for review of Board's decision on 12/13/88. On 12/13/88, the Council took the following action: "Bentley moved, seconded by Harris to reverse the Board of Appeals decision related to Variance Request No. 88-51, that the reversal be for a Wriod of three years and reconsideration take Qlace when the QroQerty was sold or significant alteration of the Qrol)erty took Qlace. Motion carried unanimously." Memo Touch of Class January 14, 1992 Page 2 On November 11, 1991, I called the Halverson office. Craig Halverson received the information from me that the approval for Variance 88-51 would lapse on December 13, 1991. I informed him that a request for an extension could be submitted to the City Council. Via a telephone conversation, Halversons requested an extension. Based upon development in this area and the slow progress of the County Road 18 upgrading, an extension of 3 years would appear reasonable. a:jean \touchof. cIs I~O --=-. • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA . ORDINANCE 29-91 Golf Pointe AN ORDINANCE OF mE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, Al\1E."IDlNG THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OrnER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. . SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RI-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RI-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly . • SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of January 21, 1992, entered into between Associated Investments, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of December, 1991, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of January, 1992. ' ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor eLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of _______ , 1992. 131 Golf Pointe • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1992, by ASSOCIATED INVESTMENTS, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential, Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5, with variances, and Preliminary Plat into five single family lots, all on 2.24 acres situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #29-91, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 3, 1991, revised and dated September 3, 1991, and •. attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHmIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for grading, streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. The grading plan shall provide that no building pad shall be constructed lower than the 844.0 elevation. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 4. FILL IN FLOOD PLAIN: Prior to release by City of any permit for grading, construction, or building on the Property, Developer agrees to obtain all permits necessary for filling below the lOO-year flood elevation of 841 on the Property. 5. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a • • • • 6. land alteration permit for the Property. Developer acknowledges that such land alteration shall provide for building pads for the structures at an elevation above 844.0 . VARIANCES FROM BOARD OF APPEALS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for building on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the Board of Appeals and obtain variances for the following: A. Reduced lot frontage on a public street from 85 ft. to 33 ft. for Lot 5 as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. Reduced setback to a driveway from 3 ft. to 0 ft. for Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. . 7. MAINTENANCE OF SHARED ACCESS TO VALLEY VIEW ROAD: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the City, and to obtain the City's approval of, covenants on the Property outlining the responsibilities for maintenance of the shared access to Valley View Road to the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer further agrees to fJJe said covenants on the Property, and to provide proof of filing to the City, prior to release by City of any occupancy permit for any structure on the Property . • EXHIBIT A Legal Des'cr"iption OUTLOT G, EDENVALE 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNEsOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-22 Golf Pointe A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 29-91 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 29-91 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of January, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 29-91, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council fInds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defIned in Minnesota Statutes, Section 331.07. c. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular offIce hours at the offIce of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 29-91 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within twenty days after said publication. 1992. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of January, ATTEST: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 29-91 Golf Pointe AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOmER, AMENDING mE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG omER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. mE CITY COUNCIL OF mE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located South of Valley View Road, east of the abandoned Chicago Northwestern Railway from the Rural District to the Rl- 13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane, City Clerk /s/ Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of 1992. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) • • • e. Ri¢e Marsh Lake PUD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 31-91-PUD-1l-91 AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTIlER, AMENDING TIlE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTIlER TIlINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the present Rural RI-13.5 and RI-9.5 Districts and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 11-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 (hereinafter "PUD-1l-91-RI-13 .5-RI-9 .5). e Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of January 21, 1992, entered into between The Pemtom Company, a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement") and that certain supplement to the Developer's Agreement, dated as of January 21, 1992, entered into between George and Jeanne Schroers, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Supplement"). The Developer's Agreement and Supplement contain the terms and conditions ofPUD-1l-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 and are hereby made a part hereof. e Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-1l-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-1l-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-II-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-1l-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section S. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be~,and hereby is removed from. the Rural RI-13.5 and RI-9.5 Districts and shall be included hereafter in the PUD-1l-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 District and the legal descriptions ofland in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. -""'This Ordinance shall become-effective from and after its passage and publication. ~__ :FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of December, 1991; and f'maIlyread"and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21st day of January, 1992. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of _____ , 1992. • , ........ • • Rice Marsh Lake PUD DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1992, by THE PEMTOM COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment of the Schroers PUD on 129.8 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 129.8 acres, with waivers, and Zoning District Change from Rural, RI-9.5, and RI-13.5 to RI-13.5 on 105.0 acres and from Rural and Rl- 9.5 to RI-9.5 on 24.8 acres, all said 129.8 acres overlain by PUD 11-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5, Preliminary Plat of 129.8 acres into 201 single family lots, three outlots, and road right-of-way, all for construction of a single family residential development, all said 129.8 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, all said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property"; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance #31-91-PUD-II-91, Developer fljrees to construction upon and maintenance of the Property as follows: 1. EXHmIT B -APPROVED PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated November 27, 1991, reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 3, 1991, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. 3. • EXHIBIT C -ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. DEDICATION OF TRAIL EASEMENT AND OUTLOTS -REIMBURSEMENT TO DEVELOPER: Concurrent with, and as part of final platting of the Property, Developer has agreed to provide an easement for trail purposes along the west side of Dell Road and has designated Outlots B and C as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, all for dedication to the City for park purposes. Developer agrees that dedication of the trail easement and outlots shall be accomplished by Developer at the time any lots abutting said trail and outlots are platted. Developer further agrees that said trail easement and outlots will be dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, mortgages, or encumbrances, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto . Upon receipt by City, and approval by the City Attorney of, a free and clear title for said Outlots B and C, City will pay Developer $100 per lot from the Park Dedication Fund for up • to 201 lots within the Property. 4. DEDICATION OF DELL ROAD CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND ROAD RIGHT- OF -WAY: Concurrent with and as part of the final plat for the Property, Developer agrees to grant to the City and its contractors easements _ for right of entry upon the Property for construction of Dell Road and the bituminous trail along the west side of Dell Road. - In the event Developer has not recorded the final plat which would provide the right-of-way for Dell Road by the time City wishes to proceed with construction of Dell Road, Developer agrees to grant to City, at no cost to City, all easements necessary to allow for construction of Dell _____ Road and the bituminous trail along the west side of Dell Road. 5. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City and obtain the City's approval of an executed special assessment agreement for Developer's share of costs for the capital improvements for the Property, as discussed in item #3, above, which shall include at least the following: A. Construction of Dell Road between Highway #5 and County Road #1, with related drainage and utility improvements and sidewalk and trail improvements which is part of the overall Dell Road/Scenic Heights Road Improvement Project. Developer acknowledges, s~ifically, that there shall be a right-in, right-out only access for the • center access pomt to Dell Road from the Property. --- B. Trunk utilities to be assessed at $3,000 per acre. C. Lateral benefit from trunk water main constructed within Dell Road. D. Lateral benefit from sanitary sewer within Dell Road. 6. CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR STREETS, UTILITIES, EROSION CONTROL: Developer may choose to construct streets and utilities for the internal, on-site improvements. In the event Developer chooses to so construct, Developer agrees that, prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of, plans for streets, trails, sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Such storm sewer utility plans shall include a detailed analysis of the phosphorous removal in the ponding system using the Walker model and complete storm sewer and pond design emergency overflow calculations. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. ILIO • • 7. 8. 9. • • Developer agrees that construction of streets and utilities on the Property by Developer shall not interfere with the public improvement project for construction and extension of utilities through the Property for Dell Road improvements. SIDEW ALK CONSTRUCTION: 'Concurrent with street and utility construction on the Property, Developer agrees to construct five-foot wide, five-inch thick concrete sidewalks in the locations depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. OPTION TO PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENTS: In lieu of the obligations imposed by items #6 and 7, above, Developer may submit a 100% petition signed by all owners of the Property, which requests' the City to install all street, sidewalk, trail, and utility improvements for the Property.' ,. , .~. , ' If Developer and all owners choose to execute the 100% petition, Developer and all owners shall enter into an Assessment agreement for such impwvements, which meets the requirements of City Code, Chapter 12, and which is in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. GRADING AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS: Prior to any construction or development on any portion of the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City Engineer's approval of, a land alteration permit for the Property. Said permit shall . include at least the following documents from Developer: A. A grading plan prepared at a 1" = 50' scale to ensure that such plans are consistent with City Code and the approved grading plan for the Property. B. A specific grading plan for the wooded area of the Property, complying with item A, above, which reflects 70 ft. wide building pads with a 25 ft. front yard setback and indicating individual lot grading for each such lot. C. Details of the grading plan which provide for staking of the construction limits with erosion control fencing and staking of the construction limits within the wooded areas with snow fencing. D. Security as required by City Code for implementation of the landscape plan attached hereto as part of Exhibit B. Said landscape plan depicts a minimum of 1,467 caliper inches of trees to be planted on the Property for mitigation of tree loss and to provide transition to Dell Road and the industrial uses to the west. (Of the 3,452 caliper inches of trees on the Property, a total of 1,610 will be removed by development, requiring a minimum of 999 caliper inches of trees to be replaced.) Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, such plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto . I L/ I 10. REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, SEPTIC AND WELL SYSTEM(S): _Prior to issuance by City of any pennit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to. submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of plans for demolition and/or removal of existing structures, septic systems, and wells which are not to remain in use on the Property. Prior to demolition, or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee the restoration of the Property to grade. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the demolition or removal on the Fxoperty is completed and after it is verified by City that such structures, septic systems and/or wells have been properly demolished or removed and that the Property has been restored to grade. - 11. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN OUTLOT C: Developer agrees to construct an eight-foot wide bituminous pathway within Outlot C, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, to be located generally along the north shore of Rice Marsh Lake. Prior to construction of said bituminous pathway, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, and shall obtain the Director's approval of plans for the exact location and design of said pathway. If Developer chooses to request City to obtain any permits required by other agencies for construction of said bituminous pathway, then Developer agrees notify City in writing of such a request and to allow City at least 60 days to obtain such permits. Concurrent ~ith grading and str~t construction for any lot adjacent to said Outlot C, Developer. agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, the entire length of said bituminous pathway throughout said Outlot C, as approved by the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 12. ARCHITECTURAL DIVERSITY IN Rl-9.S DISTRICT: Developer has submitted, and City has approved, a plan for architectural diversity within area to be zoned RI-9.5 on the Property. Such plan provides that no two substantially similar housing units shall be located directly across from each other, diagonally across from each other, or within two lots of each other. Concurrent with each request for building permit request, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, said plan, as approved by the City, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. , _ 13. NO-BUILD RESTRICTION FOR REMNANT LOT: Developer acknowledges that Outlot A of the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, does not meet City Code requirements for lot size in order to be a buildable lot within the RI-13.5 Zoning District. Developer further acknowledges that it is intended that said Outlot A be added to other lands in the future to create a buildable lot which meets City Code requirements. 14. VARIANCES GRANTED BY FINAL ORDER #91-032: Developer has obtained the following variances from the Board of Appeals with respect to requirements of the City Code Shoreland. Management Ordinance, Chapter 11, Section 11.50: III ~ • • • A. For 20 lots within Blocks 5 and 9, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, ~ariance :C:~"''''from the required lot size minimum of 40,000 sq. ft. to allow lot sizes ranging from .: 18,000 sq. ft. to 33,000 sq. ft. B. For 14 lots within Block 5 and 9, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, variance from the required 150 ft. minimum lot width at the building line to allow for lot widths 'J::-:' ~"-". ranging from 95 ft. to 140 ft. Developer agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of approval of said Final Order #91-032, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D, and hereby made a part hereof. ". 15. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the RI-13.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD 11-91: A. Waiver from front yard setback requirement. of 30 feet to allow 25 feet front yard setback for Lots 1 and 2, Block 8 and Lots 1 -6, Block 9, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. Waiver from side yard setback requirements for one side of 10 feet and both sides to total 25 feet, to allow for side yard setbacks of 10 feet and both sides to total 20 feet, for "Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, and Lots 1 -6, Block 9, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 16. STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENTS: Developer acknowledges that many" of the storm water drainage easements on the Property are larger than average due to the ponding on the Property and the crossing of the Property by an interceptor pipe. Developer further acknowledges that no structures will be constructed such that it would encroach within such easements. The following lots, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, are subject to such larger storm water drainage easements: ' Lots 1 -32, Block 1 Lots 1 - 6 and Lots 22 -27, Block 3 Lots 1 -40, Block 4 Lots 2 -7, Block 5 Lots 1 -8, Block 6 Lots 1 -4, Block 8 • .' • ; • I ~.'.. " ~ \ __ • ~.' ~. __ ._ OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN ,;·Lc'·:'THE PEM:TOM COMPANY AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ... , -.--• . --' .. Rice Marsh Lake PUD THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 1992, by and between GEORGE AND JEANNE SCHROERS, husband and wife, hereinafter jointly referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": _ .... _ For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance #31-91-PUD-1l-9l, changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural, Rl-13.5, and Rl-9.5 Districts to the PUD-11-9I-Rl- 13.5-Rl-9.5 District, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of ________ , 1992, by and between The Pemtom Company, a Minnesota corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If The Pemtom Company, fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement withi~ 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the rezoning of the Property to the Rur~ District. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager • 14U .c:: ..y-\ • PROPOSED ZONING R-13.5 LEGAl. DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING Pl!RPOSES ONI.Y All that part of the South half of the Northwest Quarter at Section 18, Townohlp 116, Ranqe 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, de~crlbed os follow.: ' Commenclnq at the North.as: corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearinq of South 0 deqrees 22 minutes 04 seconds West alonq the east line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 752.44 feet to the polnl oC beglnnln? of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 31 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 50.00 feet; thence South 80 degrees 35 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 11~.31 feet; thence South 13 degrees 14 minutes 49 second. We.t a distance ot 200.52 feet; thence South 1~ degr~e" 51 minutes 0' .econd, We.t a dlotance of 80.~1 foet; Ih~nc~ North 85 degrees 42 minutes 28 .econds We.t a distanc~ of 51.11 feet I thence North 62 degrees 43 minutes 14 seconds West a distance of 61.98 feet; thence North 46 degrees 20 minutes S9 s~cond. West a distance of 175.28 feetl thence North 34 deorees lij mlnute~ 04 .econrts East a distance of 275.39 fectl then~e North 23 dc?re~s 22 minutes IJ'seconds East a distance at 310.12 feet; thence North 73 degrees 10 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 83.00 feet: thence North 81 deqrees 33 minutes 23 seconds West a di.tance of 87.02 feetl thence North 88 degrees 04 minutes 07 seconds West a distance of 246.28 feetl thence . South 1 degree 55 minutes 53 seconds West a distance at 130.00 feetl thence South 51 degrees 08 minute. 23 seconds West a distance of 60.76 feetl thence South 76 degrees 50 minutes 12 seconds Weot a dl.tonce of 195.19 feet I thonce South 2 degr.e: ~7 minutes ~O .ocond. We~t a distance of 224.73 teet I thence South 14 degree. 52 minutes 30 seconds We.t a distance of 79.23 teet: thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 52 seconds We.t a distance of 104.51 feet: thence North 82 degrees 44 minutes 05 second. We.t a distance of 281.74 feetl thence North 42 degrees 29 mlnut~s 34 .econdo West a distance ot 5JO.63 feetl thence North 65 d~qrcc" 10 minutes 56 seconds West a diDtance of 35.70 fcotl thenco North 28 de9reea 07 minute. 44 seconds West a distance ot 195.00 fcotl thence South 62 degrees 50 minutes 13 .econds We't a distance ot 2'.96 feetl thence North 1 degree 55 minute. 5J .econds East a distance of 210.00 teet to the north line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter: thence North 88 deqree. 04 minutes 01 seconds West along said north line a distance of 545.00 feet to the northwest corner of said South Halt of the Northw.'t Quarterl thence South 0 degrees 48 minute, 04 second. West alon9 the wost line of sold South Hal! of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 1320.47 feet to the southwest corner of said South Halt of the Northwest Quarter: thence South 88 degrees 03 minutes 10 .econds East along the South line at said South Halt of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 2468.03 feet to the Southea't corner of said South Halt ot the Northwest Quarterl thence North 0 degrees 22 minute. 04 seconds East alon9 .aid east line a distance of 568.95 feat to the point of beginning. Together with "ho Northeast Quarter or the Southwest Quarter ot aaid Section 18. To~ether with That part oC the Northwest Quarter of the southwest Quarter of said Section 18, lying North of a line drawn from a point on the West line of the Northwest Quarter of the southwest Quarter distant 412.50 feet South from the Northwest corner, of the Northwest Qu~rler of the Southwest Cuarter to a point on the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter distant 175.50 feet South from the Northeast corner of the Northwest Qunrter of the SOuthwest Quarter. • Rice Marsh Lake PUD • PROPOSED ZONING R-9.5 LEGAL DE'iCRIPTION FOR REZONING P!!RPOSES ONLX All that part of the South half of the Northwe~t Quarte= of Section 18, Township 116, Ranqe 22, Hennepin C~unty. Minnesota, described as follows: I , ! Beginnlnq at the Northeast corner of .aid South Hal! of the Northweat Quarterl thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 deqrees 22 minutes 04 seconds We.t alonq the east line of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter a distance at 752.44 teet: thence North 89 degrees J7 minute. 56 seconds West a dis:ance of 50.00 feet; thence South 80 degrees 35 minutes 12 seconjs West a distance at 115.31 !eetl thence Sou~h 73 deir~es 14 mlnl,te!J 4' n",;nrul:s w'!nt a di"t.Gnce of 200.~2 feet, the:'\ce ~out:1 78 degree. 51 minutes 09 seconds West a distance a! 80.61 feet I thence North 85 degrees 42 minutes 28 second. West a dis:ance of 51.17 feet: the~ce North 62 deqrees 43 minutes 1~ seeo~ds Wo~t " dlst.nncfO of 61.98' teet: thence North 46 dec;:ees 20 minute. 5' ~econd. West a dl~t&nce of 175.28 teetl thence Nort~ 34 d~grees 18 minutes 04 seconds East a distance 0»215.3) feet; thence North 23 degrees 22 minutes 13 seconds East a dlst3nce of 310.12 teet: thence North 73 deqrees 10 minutes 25 second. West a distance ot 83.00 teetl thence Nor:~ 87 de;:~~: 33 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 87.02 te~tl thence North nn d~qr"~n 04 minutes 07 seconds We.t a di.tance oC 246.20 tect.1 thence South 1 degree 55 minutes 53 seconds West a distAnce of 130.00 feetl thence South 51 deqrees 08 minutes 23 socond. We.t a distance at 60.76, teetl thence Sout~ 76 deqrees 50 minutes 12 seconds West a distance at 195.19 feet: thence South 2 degrees 47 minute. 50 seconds We.t a distance of 224.73 ,feet; thence South 14 degrees 52 minutes 30 second. West a distance of 79.23 leet: thence South 29 deqree. 56 minutes 52 .econd. w,!,t. a di.tance of 104.51 teetl thence' North 82 degrees 44 minutQ' OS .ec6nd. w •• t a distance ot 281.74 feetl thence North 42 degroen 29 minute. 34 seconds West a distance ot 530.63 feetl thence North 65 deqrees 10 minutes 56 .econd. West a distance of 35.10 teetl thence North 28 degrees 07 minute. 44 seconds We.t a di~tance at 195.00 teetl thence South 62 degrees 50 mlnut.e. 13 n"condo W~st a dlltance ot 26.96 teetl thence North I deqr~e ~5 minute. 53 seconds East a distance ot 210.00 teet to tho north line ot .aid South Half of the Northwest Quarter: thence South 88 deqrees 04 minutes 07 seconds East along .aid north line a distance at 1913.03 feet to the point of beginning. P.U.D. AND PLATTING '1'I1P. !.ifJ\ltla lI.tlt ")( lip! UorUlw','sl (.'uarlr.r o( Section lU, 'J"tJwn:ship 116, ni1I1~~ 71. 1I'~lInt'!'l'i" COUIII y, I-linncsot.a according lu -t.he Un\te-IJ !il.illl' (;"'vt:r'" ... ·,lt :'urvt."( lllt'l"uri ',,,,,t:-:IIII! WI'III '1'1Ie r:Orllleast (,,'uarl .. r of til .. SouthweSl Quarter or said Secllu" U; Tu,;f.TIIt:l< WITIl 'I'hilt ,,_1,1 or lhl~ til 11 1 hw·!SI UU"'lt"r or SI\hJ Sout.hw~st. UUclrlcr \.Iesel ll.,C"d h9 (IJllflw:~: H'!':Ilonifl'J al II I'uint ('In the w~st line or s .. ld Uorthwpst. (,'ul,rt.lf!r f'){ lh~ ~olalhw~!Iot vu.,rleor 2S rods south of lhe IllHlh ... ·cs~ CQrI,,:r Lhprenr; lhence north, alon9 said wcst lin~, l(l ~idd 1I0rlllw'!~' curnl;OC; lhelle, l"aSl, alonq the' north line of :;"ld Uurlllwt~~l OUi\rlf'c of tll-Southwest Quart'cr, La th .. IInr'h"'I~l 1:'11""." t.hflr'·'Jr: .. hplI'!" !touth alo"' .. tilt! ",.~t. lin" f)( 5.,ltl Nl)rlhw"~il f..11lilrl-ur or lhe Suulhwcst Outlrlpr 41 rtJlJSi t 111'11';" 11I)lllI~ .. '!;1 "1 I V til' hi' .,nl,,' u( h'!'IIuniUl,. d::' \\; ,. ,.' tIl X ::r: H to H 8 ~ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-24 Ric~ Marsh Lake PUD \ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE 31-91-PUD-1l-91 -AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY • f -'::.' ,. ':.. \... =-_ ',. .~ ", " WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 31-91-PUD-1l-91 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of January, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 31-91-PUD-1l-91, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 31-91-PUD-1l-91 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within twenty days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st day of January, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • • r ......... '"-'--"_ "_" _ .. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 31-91-PUD-11-91 Ri~ Marsh Lake PUD AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.9, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance allows rezoning of land located North of Rice Marsh Lake, just east of the Chanhassen-Eden Prairie city limits from the Rural, RI-13.5, and RI-9.5 Districts and be placed in the Planned Unit Development 11-91-RI-13.5-RI-9.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: lsI John D. Frane, City Clerk lsI Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the __ day of 1992. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) 141 • • • TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEKORANDUX Mayor and City Council Carl J. Jullie, city Manager craig W. Dawson, Assistant to the city Manager~ January 16, 1992 Amendment to Aqreement with Goodwill/Easter Seal for Recyclinq The City of Eden Prairie has contracted with Goodwill Industries/Easter Seal Society of Minnesota to operate an attended drop-off recycling center for the past three years. Goodwill staffs the center, which is converted semi-trailers, from 9:00 AM - 5: 00 PM seven days a week (except for a few holidays) in the Menards Center parking lot. It accepts newsprint, corrugated (cardboard), office-grade paper, glass bottles and jars, metal cans, PET and HDPE plastics (Types #1 and #2), used clothing, and household items. This service has proved to be well-received: materials recycled through the center totalled 310 tons in 1989, 504 tons in 1990, and 532 tons in 1991. The 1991 figure represents about 17 percent of the residential recyclables collected in Eden Prairie. Goodwill has requested an amendment to the existing agreement for services to be in effect for 1992. It calls for $26,029 in compensation for its services, a 7.8 percent increase over 1991. This increase reflects changes in wages ad overhead costs and increased costs to market recyclables. All other terms of the agreement would remain the same. The city Attorney's Office has drafted the proposed amendment to the agreement. The 1992 budget includes $25,700 for amount for publicity purposes from manageable reappropriation within program. these services. Reducing the $6,000 to $5,600 would be a the solid waste management RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the proposed amendment to this agreement and approve the reappropriation within the solid waste management program. CWD: jdp Attachment AMENDMENT TO CITY/GOODWILL RECYCLABLE COLLECTION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made as of the day of , 1992 by the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Goodwill Industries, Inc./Easter Seal Society of Minnesota (herei?after referred to as the "Contractor"). NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to continue in full force and effect the provisions of the City/Goodwill Recyclable Collection Agreement executed on the day of , 1990 except as amended as follows: 1 . 1992. The term of the Agreement is extended to December 31, 2. Section 5.2 of the Agreement shall provide: The City shall compensate Contractor for its services at the rate of $26,029.00 for the period of January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992 payable in 12 equal monthly payments and shall provide advice and counsel to Contractor on the services provided by Contractor. 3. Contractor agrees to maintain the insurance required under Section 6 of the Agreement, and to provide the certificates of insurance required in Section 6.2 for the period of January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992. EXECUTED as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By By Douglas B. Tenpas Its Mayor Carl J. Jullie Its Manager GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC./ EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA By Its • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-14 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF GOLF POINTE WHEREAS, the plat of Golf Pointe has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Golf Pointe is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated January 16, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on January 21, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk /60 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council members THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engin~r FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ieffrey Iohnson, Engineering Technici~ January 16, 1992 Final Plat of Golf Pointe .. ~ \ PROPOSAL: The Developers, Associated Investments, have requested City Council approval of the final plat of Golf Pointe. Located south of Valley View Road and East of the abandoned Chicago Northwestern Railway, the plat contains 2.24 acres to be divided into five single family lots. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council December 3, 1991 per Resolution No. 91-259. • The Second Reading of Ordinance No. 29-91, Zoning District Change from Rural • to R1-13.5, and execution of the Developer's Agreement are scheduled for the City Council meeting January 21, 1992. VARIANCES: Variances were granted through the Board of Appeals for reduced lot frontage of Lot 5 from 85 feet to 33 feet and a reduced driveway setback on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. Prior to release of the final plat the plat shall be revised to reflect 33 feet of street frontage along Valley View Road on Lot 5. Any additional variance request must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal utilities, roadways and walkways necessary to serve this project are currently in place. This proposal will require the extension of existing municipal sanitary sewer and watermain to serve additional lots. Prior to release of the final plat the developer shall provide the City Engineer with detailed plans and specifications for the extension of these municipal utilities. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. BONDING: Bonding for the extension of municipal utilities shall be provided prior to release of the final plat. 151 • • • • Final Plat of Golf Pointe (Resolution No. 92-14) January 16, 1992 Page 2 of 2 .. :~ RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Golf Pointe subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement and the following: 1. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $540. 2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250. 3. Revision of final plat to show 33 feet of street frontage on Lot 5. 4. Receipt of construction plans. 5. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. II:ssa cc: Tom Robertson, Associated Investments Paul Thorp, H.T.P.O . • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-15 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WINDFIELD 1ST ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Wind field 1st Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Windfield 1st Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated January 14, 1992. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on January 21, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council members THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Techniciarv.n. January 14, 1992 \ . Final Plat of Windfield 1st Addition (Resolution No. 92-15) • PROPOSAL: The Pemtom Company is requesting City Council approval of the final plat of Windfield 1st Addition. Located at the southwest quadrant of Dell Road and Highway 5, the plat contains 129.8 acres to be divided into 56 single family lots, four outlots, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Outlots A, B, C and D contain 0.29, 4.95, 70.26, and 27.93 acres respectively. Outlot A is an unbuilt remnant parcel intended to be combined with adjoining properties to the east to create a buildable lot at a future date; Outlot B is a wetland area intended for dedication to the City; Outlot C will be retained by the developer for future development purposes; Outlot D is a wetland • surrounding Rice Marsh Lake and is also intended to be dedicated to the City at a later date. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council December 3, 1991, per Resolution No. 91-246. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 31-91-PUD-1l-91 is scheduled for City Council approval December 21, 1992. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution January 21, 1992. VARIANCES: A variance was granted from City Code Chapter 11, Shoreland Management Code, to permit smaller lot sizes and narrower lot widths through Variance No. 91-032. All other variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. UTILITIES AND STREETS: As stated in the Developer's Agreement, prior to release of the final plat, developer shall provide the City Engineer and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer for the property, or in lieu of that shall submit the I 00 % petition requesting the City to install • all public utilities and streets. • • • Final Plat of Windfield 1st Addition Resolution No. 92-15 Page 2 of2 January 14, 1992 Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall enter into a Special Assessment Agreement with the City for the developer's share for the following capital improvements: 1. Construction of Dell Road between Highway 5 and County Road 1, including drainage and utility improvements and sidewalk and trail improvements, as part of the overall Dell Road/Scenic Heights Road improvement project. 2. Trunk sewer and water improvements to be assessed at a rate of $3,000 per acre. 3. Lateral benefit of trunk watermain constructed within Dell Road. PARK DEDICATION: Prior to release of the final plat, the developer shall provide the City with a warranty deed for Outlot B. In order to provide for a trail corridor along Dell Road, the developer has agreed to provide the City with trail easements on lots abutting Dell Road. BONDING: Bonding should be provided for all public utilities and streets to be constructed within the project in conformance with City Code and the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Windfield 1st Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $1,752. 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $7,938. 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $2,240. 4. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. 5. Execution of Special Assessment Agreement. 6. Receipt of Warranty Deed for Outlot B and trail easements abutting Dell Road. 7. Approval of construction plans for streets and utilities. JJ:ssa cc: Dan Herbst, Pemtom Company James R. Hill & Associates 161) .. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE .. :~ HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ RESOLUTION NO. 92-16 RESOLUTION REQUESTING MSA FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF TOWNLlNE ROAD WHEREAS, Hennepin County Department of Public Works, City of Min etonka and the City of Eden Prairie desire to cooperatively reconstruct Townline Road (CSAH 62) from CSAH 60 to TH 101; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to utilize MSA funds for off system expenditure as the City's share for this roadway improvement project; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations Section 8820.150 , Subp. 12. states that State Aid funds may be utilized "for improvements within its b undaries on a State Trunk Highway or County State Aid Highway"; and WHEREAS, the City of Minnetonka is willing to readjust the corporate li its line with the City of Eden Prairie to accommodate the specific language of the State A· d Operation • Rules, but at a considerable cost and time expenditure; and WHEREAS, the sole reason that the roadway has been adjusted is to a commodate proper design for frontage roads and land access along the corridor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eden Pr ·rie hereby requests the Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation grant a variance to low an off system expenditure of MSA funds outside of the corporate limits of the ity of Eden Prairie. ADOYfED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 21st day of January, 19 2. Douglas B. Tenpas, Ma or ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE .. "); HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ RESOLUTION NO. 92-17 RESOLUTION REQUESTING MSA HORIZONTAL CURVE RADIUS VARIANCE FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF ROWLAND ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota desires to improve Rowland Road from Trunk Highway No. 62 to Shady Oak Road (MSAS 181-118) and; WHEREAS, State Aid Operations, Minnesota Rules Section 8820.9935 s tes that the minimum horizontal curve radius of an undivided MSA street with a 2 perc nt crown is 300 feet, and; WHEREAS, acquisition of additional right-of-way to construct a street me ting current standards, including sidewalks for pedestrian safety, will cause extensive hardship to adjacent residential property owners in relation to existing slopes and tre s and cause construction of an offset intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eden Pr ·rie hereby requests the Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation grant a varian e to allow Rowland Road to be constructed with a 175-foot horizontal curve radius rom Station 58+91.84 to Station 60+00.40. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 21st day of January, 19 2. Douglas B. Tenpas, M yor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1iJ? • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works . . DATE: January 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Utility Vehicles Budget Amendment \. During the budget preparation process, one section of the Utility Budget (Enterprise Fund) was inadvertently omitted from the final budget proposal. The vehicle acquisition/replacement segment of the Water Utility program was not incorporated into the final budget package. The result is that three vehicles at a total estimated cost of $61,000 was not submitted for your consideration. The vehicle needs are listed as follows: A. Replace 112-ton pickup with a 3/4-ton 4X4 and 7-1/2-foot western plow ($16,081.50). The existing vehicle is a 1983 Chevrolet pickup with 72,000 miles and is in need of extensive body repair and engine work. Additionally, the actual need in the Division is for a pickup with snow plowing capability. That capability costs approximately $5,000, but makes the vehicle more versatile. B. Replace 3/4-ton 4X4 with plow with a similar vehicle ($16,081.50). The current vehicle is a 1984 Chevrolet 3/4-ton 4X4 with 82,000 miles and is in need of major body repair, engine work and drive line repair. This vehicle has always been a snow plowing vehicle and is at the end of its service life. C. Add a one-ton utility vehicle with dump box, under-hood compressor and radio ($28,700). This vehicle is an add on vehicle for the specific purpose of repair projects to catch basins and manholes. The Street Division and Parks Division each have one of these vehicles and have had extremely good success with them. The one-ton utility box puts materials on the job site at the proper working height for the crew rather than above their shoulders using our dump trucks. The resulting ease of access of the materials at a proper working height provides more efficiency at the job site and a potential for injury reductions by using the right piece of equipment for a particular job. The total Utility Fund budget for sewer and water for 1992 is $4,772,200. This request for these three vehicles represents a 1.3 % increase in the budget asking. The source of funding for this change will come from the budget reserves from the enterprise fund and will not result in a change to water or sewer rates. EAD:ssa Dsk:CC. UTIL-VEH.BGT • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNF.SOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-25 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 1-92 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st of January, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 1-92, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council fmds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. C. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 331.07. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 1-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within twenty days after said publication. ADOPfED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st of January, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk res92-25 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 5.40, SUBDS. 4, 6, 7.A AND B., S.B AND F., AND ADOPI'ING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 5.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCn.. OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance amends that section of the City Code relating to lawful gambling. It allows lawful gambling operations to be conducted without a requrement that a location be owned by an eligible organization on those premises at which lawful gambling was licensed prior to November 2, 1989. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane, City Clerk /s/ Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the 30th day of January 1992. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) ordl-92 / I toO • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-19 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BRAXTON POND FOR WESTAR PROPERTIES, INC. BE IT RESOLV,ED, by the EdenPrairie City Council as follows: Braxton Pond That the preliminary plat of Braxton Pond for Westar Properties, Inc. dated December 13, 1991, consisting of 6 single family lots and road right-of-way on 3.6 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of January 1992 . ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk I f J 01 Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ( ( PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -NOVEMBER 25. 1991 B. BRAXTON POND (91-29-Z-P) by Westar Properties, Inc. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 3.6 acres; and Preliminary Platting of 3.6 acres into six single family lots and road right-of-way to be known as Braxton Pond. Location: South and west of the terminus of existing Braxton Drive. (A public hearing) Ron Bastyr, representing the proponent, stated that the proposal was for 6 single family lots. The proponent concurred with the Staff recommendations. Franzen reported that the proposed site had been guided low density for several years. Braxton Drive would become the access to the elementary school. The proposal was in compliance with the RI-13.5 zoning requirements. Franzen noted that the timing of the project had to be done in conjunction with the Braxton Drive construction and Westar Lane would be a temporary cul-de-sac. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to the Staff recommendations. \, Sandstad asked if Braxton Drive existed currently north of the proposed site. Franzen replied that Braxton Drive would run from County Road 1 to Scenic Heights Road and added that Braxton drive did not exist north of the site at this time. Ruebling asked if Westar Lane aligned with School Drive. Franzen replied no. Bastyr added that Westar Lane was approximately SOO feet to the north of School Drive . Ruebling noted that 1 of the homes would have access directly onto Braxton Drive and asked if there would be other in the future. Franzen replied that Braxton Drive would be a local collector which can accommodate a limited number of driveways. MOTION 1: Norman moved, seconded by Hallett to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Norman moved, seconded by Hallett to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of We star Properties, Inc., for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.S on 3.6 acres, to be known as Braxton Pond, based on plans dated November 15, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 22, 1991. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3: • • Norman moved, seconded by Hallett to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Westar Properties, Inc., for Preliminary Plat of 3.6 acres into six (6) single family lots and road right-of-way to be known as Braxton Pond, based on plans dated November 15, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated November • 22, 1991. Motion carried 6-0-0. I('~ • • • ( ( STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning FROM: Donald R. Uram, Planner DATE: November 22, 1991 SUBJECT: Braxton Pond APPLICANT: Westar Properties, Inc. FEE OWNER: Eden Prairie School District WCATION: South and west of the terminus of existing Braxton Drive REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 3.6 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 3.6 acres into six single family lots and road right-of-way. BACKGROUND This site is designated for development as Low Density Residential. Adjacent land is guided Low Density to the west and north, and the Cedar Ridge Elementary School is located to the west. This site is currently zoned Rural. SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT The site plan depicts the subdivision of 3.6 acres into six single family lots at a density of 1.6 units per acre. The lots range in size from 13,900 square feet to 32,800 square feet with a 19,633 square foot average. All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the RI-13.5 Zoning District. ACCESS Access to this site will be provided by the extension of Braxton Drive and Westar ,. 5 . ' i0 R1-9.5* ( ( Lane. Westar Lane will provide access to the adjacent property to the west. The developer is petitioning for the construction of Westar Lane. Braxton Drive will be constructed by the City • and assessed to the adjacent property owners. Braxton Drive will include an 8' bituminous trail on the east side and a 5' concrete sidewalk on . the west side of the road. GRADING Elevations on the site range from a high point of 884 along the west property line to a low point of 863 along the north property line within the pond area. Minimal grading is expected on the entire side to allow for road construction and building pads. Walkout lots are proposed along the pond to the north to take advantage of exisiting slopes. There is an existing pond located to the west of Block 2 which has a 100-year flood elevation of 879.9. The floor elevations of the homes in this area must be 2 feet above this elevation. The grading plan must be revised to reflect a minimum floor elevation of 881.9. - The preliminary grading plan is subject to change based on the final road grades for Braxton Drive. UTILITIES Water and sanitary sewer service will be installed in Braxton Drive with the road construction. • Services will be extended in Westar Lane to provide utility service to the properties to the west. Storm water runoff is proposed to be collected within a catch basin system and discharged into the pond along the north property line. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 3.6 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.6 acres into six single family lots and road right-of-way based on revised plans dated November 15, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated November 22, 1991, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council approval, proponent shall revise the grading plan to reflect a minimum floor elevation of 881.9 for homes within Block 2. 2. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: A. Provide detailed utility, storm water runoff, and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. /&[/ • ( ( • 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate cash park fee. 4. Submit a petition for the construction of Westar Lane. 5. Development of the project cannot proceed until Braxton Drive is under construction. • • I~S • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-20 Riverview Heights A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS FOR HUSTAD HOMES AND ROBERT AND JAMES BROWN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Riverview Heights pun Concept by Hustad Homes and Robert and James Brown and considered their request for approval for development and waivers and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on January 21, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1992. 1. Riverview Heights by Hustad Homes and Robert and James Brown, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans as revised dated December 13, 1991. 3. That the pun Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated December 9, 1992. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21st day of January, Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk ~ ~ ( \.' (!\i 11 , tJU' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-21 Riverview Heights rc _ ___ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT ,_~;:. OF RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS .FOR HUSTAD HOMES AND ROBERT AND JAMES BROWN .... .: .. . -~.'-~--~- BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Riverview Heights for Hustad Homes and Robert and James Brown dated December 13, 1991, consisting of 34 single family lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way on 65 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of January, 1992. (:~., J ,.-' '. '1 ~ .--. ... _ •. '.. ~. __ Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk lG1 • • • .;!anning Commission .,.,ecember 9, 1991 B. • • Page 2 Bauer moved, seconded by Hallett to close the public hearing and return the item to the Developer, without prejudice. Motion carried 4-0-0. RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS (91-35-PUD-Z-P) by Hustad Homes and Robert and James Brown. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 65 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 65 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-13.5 on 5.7 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the RI-22 District on 5.0 acres; Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-44 on 15.7 acres; Preliminary Plat of 65 acres into 34 single family lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way to be known as Riverview Heights. Location: South of Riverview Road, east of Riverview Drive East. (A public hearing) Wallace Hustad introduced Bob Brown and Randy Hedlund who would also be available for questions on the project. Hustad stated that the property along Riverview Road had been platted Rl-22 in 1954. The property did not have sewer or public utilities available. The original plan was for 5 to 6 acre lots without city sewer or water. The homes be high-end single family with a transition from Bluffs West and Bluffs 5th Addition. The interior of the project is currently zoned Rl-22 with the lots along the river being zoned for acre lots. The overall density of the project with 33 lots is 1.5 units per acre. Hustad noted that the maximum grade was approximately 8 % with a gradual sloping to the river. The road location had been changed from the original plan due to the steep grade. A private trail system would be created for the 33 homeowners and a public trail would also be provided to connect with the Eden Prairie trail system. Hustad stated that a park area would be dedicated to the City. Sandstad asked if the 75 foot easement would contour along the river. Hustad replied yes. Hustad added that the 17 acres of park land would be dedicated to the City above and beyond the 75 foot easement along the river. Hustad noted that some excavation around a small inlet could be necessary to prevent the inlet from just becoming a mudhole. He added that the proponent would like to fill in the inlet. Hallett asked if the City would be guaranteed a trail whether the inlet was filled in or not. Franzen replied that he would need to consult with Bob Lambert but believed that the trail was wide enough to allow for a trail if the area was filled in or not. Hustad added that this issue also needed to be discussed with the DNR and Watershed District. Hustad concluded by stating that the homes would have varying price ranges with the majority of them being in the higher range . ( Planning Commission December 9, 1991 .- L ( RandyHedlund, representing the proponent, stated that this project had been in the works since 1988. The major problem on the project was the grade. An alternate access and platting of the property was necessary to allow the road to be constructed within the City grade requirements. ,Hedlund noted that the proponent was very aware that this was a sensitive area for development and, therefore, had reduced the number of lots from 40 to 33. He added that the proponent had also tried to limit the amount of grading needed in order to allow for the preservation of the natural areas. Hedlund stated that individual site grading plans would be done on the RI-44 lots at building permit request time. Approximately 40% of the property would be mass graded to provide for the development and roadway construction. Hedlund stated that the City had been concerned about access to the property to the east of the proposed development and had, therefore, an access has been provided. The road was shifted approximately 25 feet to the east to save the oak trees. Hedlund noted that it was not necessary to disturb the RI-44 lots as much for grading as the RI-22 lots. The proponent proposed to locate the N.U.R.P. ponds within the floodplain if State approval was received. If approval was not received the N. U.R.P. ponds would be located on lot 19, reducing the number of developable lots to 32. Hedlund noted that nothing could be built below the 722 floodplain area. Sandstad asked if there would be periodic flooding in the dedicated park area. ' HedIU. replied that the water did not go much above the 705 elevation. Sandstad asked Staff if they had any history of flooding in this area. Franzen replied that the 1965 flood was a 100 year storm event with an elevation of the river at 722.4. Franzen added that this area was very flat. Bob Brown, who has lived in the area, stated that from 1917 to 1940 the property was not flooded at all. He added that it would take a major rain fall to cause the river to rise significantly. Sartdstad asked what type of use was planned for the park. Franzen replied the use would be passive and the trails would be left as natural as possible. Hedlund added that the trail would be wood chips and the park would mainly be a picnic area. Hedlund reported that the overall tree loss on the project was approximately 15 % with the area above the floodplain at approximately 50%. Lift stations would be installed in lieu of the individual septic systems originally proposed. Hustad noted that property involving Mr. & Mrs. Condin and Tom Brown were part of this plan. Mr. & Mrs. Condin had requested to purchase a portion of one of the lots shown and if Mr. Brown did not sell a portion of one of the lots shown on the plan a lot would need to be eliminated and the overall density of the project would be lower. • ~anning Commission ..,.ecember 9, 1991 • Page 4 Laura Bluml, 3719 26th Avenue South, Minneapolis, stated that she and her' husband owned the lot adjacent to the proposed site. Bluml noted that this area was classified as a water ,washout area. She added that the trees were removed due to a sewer line breakage and spill. Bluml was concerned if the area was safe since it had never been tested after the sewage overflow. Bluml stated that the City had committed to restoration of the area in 1988; however, nothing has been done. She believed that the property just below their lot would flood frequently and was concerned that they would be,bothered by trespassers on their lot if the trail was closed off because of high water. Bluml was also concerned about a reoccurrence of the sewer breakage. Bluml asked to be shown where the lift station and picnic area would be located. Hedlund showed the location of these items on the plan. Bluml believed that the picnic area would be visible from their property and wanted to know that it would be a pleasing site. Bluml presented pictures of the property before and after the sewage disaster. She added that she did not blame the Browns for this problem it was the responsibility of the Waste Commission. Bluml wanted to see that the commitment made in 1988 was upheld and would like to know a timetable as to when the restoration might be completed. Franzen replied that a restoration plan had been filed with the City and trees had been planted in the lower area; however, they did not survive. He added that eventually the area would fill in naturally. Hallett asked why the delay in the restoration. Franzen replied that the first planting had not survived and no further attempts were made. Hallett asked if the land was safe for development. Franzen replied that the property would have an environmental audit and the property owner would be responsible for any clean up necessary. Franzen noted the letter from Williams Pipeline stating that additional monitoring and water samplings needed to be done. Sandstad asked if the Staff recommendations specifically dealt with requirement for an environmental inspection. Franzen replied that Recommendation #7 on Page 9 addressed these issues. Sandstad asked if the property could be dedicated before platting. Franzen replied that the property could be dedicated now or 5 years from now, it was up to the proponent. Hustad replied that lawyers were involved with the contamination issues and the Williams Pipeline issue, neither of which were settled at this time. Hustad added that the Browns did not want to delay the dedication of the property any longer than possible. Bauer added that any time there was a potential pollution problem a battery of lawyers would be looking at the issues from every angle and it would take time to resolve. Sandstad was concerned that the property might not be safe for a park and then a \1D ( Planning Commission December 9, 1991 ( l dedication of property would not occur as proposed. Hustad stated that the City had committed to provide property within_the floodplain area. Hustad noted thattheBrowns had ,also had-to deal with a loss of trees because of the spillage. :~ --, .. Hallett asked if the archeological survey for Indian burial mound had been completed and if not how this would affect the proposal. Franzen replied that if a mound was found it would have to be built around and protected. Hallett questioned how quickly this agency worked and if anything could be found with all the snow on the ground now.:· Franzen replied that the State only had 1 or 2 people to handle this area. Franzen noted that much of this property had been previously disturbed by farming. Hustad replied that an archeological survey had been done in 1976; however, this was still a concern for the proponent. Hustad noted that the proponent was required to have a letter of approval before construction. Norman asked if there was any need to delay approval of the project as requested by the letter from Ed Schlampp. Hustad replied that he was not aware of any objections by Mr. Schlampp. He added that access had been provided to the Schlampp property.. Frnnzen replied that Mr. Schlampp basically wanted additional time to review the proposal • was not necessarily objecting to the project. -- --_ -_ -_ Franzen reported that many requirements for projects today dealt with environmental issues. He added that the Slope Ground Ordinance was enacted to prevent erosion on sites. Franzen stated that a special retaining walls would be required on some lots to keep the banks in place. He added that the proponent had been requested to position the homes on the lots to eliminate the need for extensive use of retaining walls. Franzen stated that the grading done initially would be for road construction and. added that individual lot grading permits would be required at building permit issuance to allow for preservation of additional trees. Franzen stated that the worst case scenario for tree loss would be 25 % for road construction. Franzen noted that new regulations required the construction ofN.U.R.P. ponds to be placed outside the floodplain area. Franzen stated that Staff recommended approval of the project based on the Staff recommendations outlined in the Staff Report. Franzen added that the archeological survey would need to be completed prior to 2nd Reading, the environmental audit completed, and protective fencing installed prior to gradiltg. Hallett asked if the proposal was to be reviewed by the Parks & Recreation Commission. Franzen replied yes. • \1 \ _~lanning Commission ....,ecember 9, 1991 • Page 6 Loretta Swanson, 11340 Riverview Road, asked if Valley Oak Road would be public or private .. Hustad replied that the.private road would be vacated and a new public road constructed. Bauer complimented Staff on a very detailed, well thought out report. Franzen replied that this project had been in the works for approximately 2 years. Bauer believed that Mr. Schlampp would have time to review the project before the project proceeded to the City Council and did not believe that a delay was necessary. MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to close the public hearing. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 2: Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Robert and James Brown for Planned Unit Development Concept on 65 acres for residential development to be known as Riverview Heights, based on plans dated November 11, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated December 6, 1991. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 3: Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Robert and James Brown for Planned Unit Development District Review,.with waivers, and Zoning District change from Rl-22 to Rl-13.5 on 5.7 acre, Zoning District Amendment within the Rl-22 District on 5.0 acres, and Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-44 on 15.7 acres, for residential development to be known as Riverview Heights, based on plans dated November 11, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated December 6, 1991. Motion carried 4-0-0. MOTION 4: Bauer moved, seconded by Norman to recommend to the City Council approval of the .' request of Robert and James Brown for Preliminary Plat of 65 acres into 34 single family lots, three outlots, and road right-of-way, to be known as Riverview Heights, based on plans dated November 11, 1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated December 6, 1991. Motion carried 4-0-0. ( c STAFF REPORT , :~ " TO: Planning Commission FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: REQUEST: BACKGROUND Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning December 6, 1991 Riverview Heights South of Riverview Road, east of Riverview Drive East Wallace Hustad Wallace Hustad, Jim Brown, Bob Brown 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 65 acres. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 65 acres. Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-13.5 on 5.7 acres, and Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-44 on 15.7 acres. Zoning District Amendment within the existing RI-22 District on 5.0 acres. Preliminary Plat of 65 acres and to 34 single family lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as low density residential above the 1 00 Year Flood Plain of the Minnesota River and Public Open Space for the flood plain area. The low density designation allows up to two and one-half units per acre. This site is currently zoned RI- 22. There is an existing RLS on this property which depicts a total of 15 lots and includes right- of-way for Valley Oak Drive which has not been built. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The Planned Unit Development Concept depicts a transition of lot sizes from RI-13.5 adjacent to Riverview Road to RI-44 lots adjacent to the Minnesota River. There are 34 lots proposed on 26.4 net acres of land at a density of 1.3 units per acre. This compares with the average residential density of 2 units per acre throughout the community and a residential density of 1.5 units per acre for subdivisions that are developed adjacent to lakes, creeks, streams, rivers and wetland areas. 1 • • • .... D -.." - (I) ... , ~ORTH ,' ............. . Proposed "~ Riverview Heights -- " ( ( , Staff Report ',' ,~ ", -Riverview Heights The proposed PUD concept changes the location of access to the property. Valley Oak Drive exists as right-of-way on the east portion of the property. The PUD proposes a new road access off of Riverview Drive East. __ -. -~~<, Th~ foll()wing PUD waivers are requested. ----·--I::~:-2.·iot f'ronttg~ies~-ihan 100 feet for proposed Lots 20, 21, and 22. 2. Lot size for proposed Lot 15 from 44,000 square feet to 33,350 square feet. Lot size waiver for proposed Lot 32 from 13,500 square feet to 13,445 square feet. Lot size -waiver for-proposed Lot 23, 24, and 25 from 22,000 square feet to 18,445 square feet, '. 21,700 square feet and 21,250 square feet. ,- 3. Use of a private road to provide access to Lots 20, 21, and 22. This project could be designed to meet the requirements of the RI-13.5, Rl-22, and Rl-44 Zoning Districts by shifting lot lines. The project as proposed with waivers results in a better lotting pattern and rectangular shaped lots that are easier to develop. Access to Lots 20, 21, and 22 could be by public road, however, the use of private drive results • in less grading and saves trees. • BLUFF CHARACTER The character of the bluff in the area of this subdivision is gently rolling to steep, dropping from an average elevation of about 830, to a flood plain elevation of 722.4. The face of the bluff is largely wooded with some open pockets of meadow. The bluff contains highly erodible soils, _. -,- .--, .. --but is largely protected in this area because of the heavy vegetation. Homes are proposed to be terraced down the bluff. The area at the top of the bluff near Riverview Road, where the topography is not as steep, is proposed for an area of Rl-13.5 zoning. As the road and homes terrace farther down the bluff the lot sizes increase in relation to the steepness of the slope and extent of heavy wooded cover. Although many of the homes are located near the flood plain, existing vegetation within the flood plain will block the views of the homes from the river. There are existing trees across lots 27-30 which block views of the upper half of the project from the Minnesota River. The impact on the bluff character is largely determined by the location of the roadway. Approximately 60% of the tree loss is due to grading necessary to build the road. The road is 2 \lS • • • • Staff Report Riverview Heights ( ( t " ;,-' in a good location ata'maximum of an 8% road grade. Total tree loss on the property is 15%. This compares favorably with the Timber Bluff project overall tree loss at 17%. -Credit is given for trees preserved as either public or private open space within the flood plain. Tree loss in the upper portion of the property above the 100 Year Flood Plain is 50 % . This compares with a 74% tree loss for the area above the flood plain area in the Timber Bluffs project. BLUFF PROTECTION The City has the responsibility to review development in an area as significant as Minnesota River Bluffs in a way which protects it as a natural resource, while allowing private development. The PUD concept with transitions from small lot sizes adjacent to Riverview Road to RI-44 lots on the lower portion of the bluff south is an appropriate request. The developer plans to minimize the amount of initial grading with the subdivision by constructing the road and utility improvements only at this time. The grading limits established with the first phase indicate a minimal amount of grading and tree removal necessary for these improvements. However, with the development of a subdivision, quite often the most impact on a site is realized when the individual homes are built. Sizing lots to match the expected home size is a critical step in impacting a site as little as possible. The developer has provided a grading plan with hypothetical house pads. House pads proposed for the Rl-44 District vary between 45-70 feet in depth. Practical experience has shown that homes within scenic areas typically are much larger areas. The Staff has evaluated the proposed grading based on a hypothetical building pad of 100' in depth (this is consistent with the Timber Bluff analysis). The developer would be restricted from grading beyond this worst case situation. For each lot to be constructed within this proposed subdivision, an individual site grading permit would be required. This would allow City participation in the individual design of houses on- site. The builder would be required to place and maintain erosion control around all initial construction and be responsible for placement and maintenance of erosion control on each of the individual lots as needed. TREE LOSS There are 15,186 inches of significant trees that exist on this site. With the installation of utilities in the roadway, a total of 1,114 caliper inches would be lost or 7.5 % removed. In the worst case scenario, based on 100 foot deep house pads for the Rl-44 District, 70 foot house pads for the Rl-22 District, and 50 foot house pads for the Rl-13.5 District, a total of 2,228 caliper inches of trees would be removed or 15 % . This is within the average of other 3 11 r .lo Staff Report Riverview Heights ( ( subdivisions of approximately 30%. The lower percentage in this case is consistent with the sensitivity of this area.·· Although tree replacement will be calculated based on the worst case grading plan, the developer will be credited back as individual homes are constructed if additional trees are saved. Tree loss has a measure of impact on the bluff character. Tree loss above the 100 Year Flood Plain is approximately 50%. Approximately half of this tree loss is due to road construction and the remainder would be due to house pads. The net tree loss of the Timber Bluffs project was 75%. The proposed tree replacement plan depicts a total of 800 caliper inches of trees. The trees proposed for replacement are but mostly ash, maple and linden with some conifers. Since the majority of the trees lost due to construction are oak, a high percentage of oak trees should be replaced as part of the project. PARKS/TRAILS • The developer is proposing to gift Outlot C as a potential future park. Outlot C contains the Metro Sanitary Sewer Washout and the Williams pipeline break. The attached letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to the Williams Pipeline Company indicates that additional information is needed in order for the MPCA to sign off on pollution potential. If the City is • to accept ownership of this property in the future, it should be predicated upon a Level One Environmental Audit being conducted for this land area, and MPCA approval. Outlot B would be retained as a common area as private open space for the residents within the subdivision. A 75 foot wide trail easement is proposed along the Minnesota River which will allow the opportunity for connection to the future Minnesota River Wildlife Trail. A Cash Park Fee would applicable to this project. SITE GRADING Slope stabilization is extremely important on the Minnesota River Bluffs. Individual grading permits will be required for each lot to assure that the minimal amount of site is being disturbed at anyone time. This also helps protect erosion of the bluff and minimize pollution of the Minnesota River. In order to build on some of the RI-44 lots, especially Lots 20, 21, and 22, a series of retaining walls (4 to 6 feet in height individually) totaling of up to 25 feet would be 4 ill • • • • Staff Report Riverview Heights ( ( c.-.. ' /' necessary .. Given the size of the lots, it should be possible to locate a house pad which either minimizes the proposed retaining walls. The proposed grading on these lots does depict a worst case scenario, however, the developer should to look at alternatives which do not rely so much on the use of retaining walls. Development on steep slopes will require specially engineering designed footings and retaining walls because of the type of soil which is sand and steepness of the slope. It will be required that an engineer certify the structural capability of these retaining walls and footings prior to the issuance of the building permit. Proposed Lots 16, 17, 18, and 20 are located close to the 100 Year Flood Plain elevation of 722.4. If homes were built to a hypothetical 100 foot depth, the homes would be built within the 100 Year Flood Plain of the Minnesota River. As proposed these houses are approximately 50 feet in depth. The City ordinance requires that the basement floor elevations be a minimum of two feet above the 100 Year Flood elevation. The lowest floor elevation of any of these three houses is on proposed Lot 17 with an elevation of 725.6 which is 3.2 feet above the 100 Year Flood elevation. For each of these lots, the 100 Year Flood elevation will control the depth of the house pad. -_ SHORELAND ORDINANCE The Shoreland area is 300' from the Minnesota River. This site is 500' from the river and provisions of Shoreland Ordinance do not apply. UTILITIES Sewer and water is available to this site. Because of the steepness of the slope and homes located at the bottom of the slope, a lift station will be required. This lift station must be sized large enough to accommodate the potential development of the Schlampp property to the east of this site. A watermain will be constructed to the bottom of the slope. This will be a temporary dead end watermain until the water line is looped back to Riverview Road with the future development of the property to the east. The vertical drop on the property will contribute to increased water pressure on the end of the line. A pressure reducing value will be necessary at Riverview Road. The design of this will be studied further as part of improvement plans for the property . 5 \ID Staff Report Riverview Heights ( ( DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF PROPERTY TO THE EAST ... :~ \ The Staff has analyzed the possibility of development of the Schlampp property to the east. Although Mr. Schlampp has indicated to the City that he has no immediate or long range intentions of ever developing the property, nevertheless it is the responsibility of the City to look at ways in which the site could_ develop which minimizes the impact on the river bluffs. The upper portion of the Schlampp property is very steeply sloped. This will allow for some development of walk-out units on the top. Access to the bottom of the property may be difficult due to the degree of slope. The Riverview Heights proposal allows for the opportunity for a connection to the Schlampp property on the lower of the site which is relatively level. STORM WATER RUN-OFF/WATER QUALITY • The City of Eden Prairie is currently applying new regulations regarding storm water run-off and water qUality. As part of this project, it will be required that a (NURP) National Urban Run-off Program pond be installed on the property. New wetland regulations prohibit the location of NURP ponds within wetland areas or flood plain areas. The NURP pond is proposed on the property within the 1 00 Year Flood Plain and will have to be relocated. The attached drawing from Hedlund Engineering indicates a possible location for a primary and secondary pond. This would be on proposed Lot 19 within the subdivision. This pond is sized to accommodate 1.8 to 2.4 acre feet of storage based on a 100 Year storm event. This is a standard requirement of • the City and the Watershed District. From these proposed ponding areas, a storm sewer pipe could be constructed to the 100 Year Flood Plain. The practice of using NURP ponds will minimize the amount of pollutants that would be discharged into the wetland areas, flood plain and river channel of the Minnesota River. ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY The City is aware of Indian burial mounds and other archeological findings along the Minnesota River Bluff Area. We do not have detailed enough information to determine if such conditions exist on this property. It is recommended that the developer contact the State Historical Society and have an archeological survey completed of the property, prior to 2nd Reading. PRELIMINARY PLAT The existing Valley Oak Road right-of-way through the project will have to be vacated. The right-of-way will revert back to the existing and future owners of lots within this subdivision. Although Lot 15 has frontage on new Valley Oak Road, it is not possible to construct a driveway because of the steepness of the slope. The proposed access to this site would be by driveway to Riverview Road. The 33 foot right-of-way for Valley Oak Road should be incorporated as part of Lot 15 so that a driveway access could be constructed and maintained on private property . 6 '1~ • • Staff Report Riverview Heights CONCLUSION-'r (. ( The Minnesota River Bluff is a unique and valuable resource. Eden Prairie has always been concerned about the impact of development on natural environment and has encouraged the careful an knowledgeable development along the bluff. The City in the approval of the Timber Bluff subdivision,· approximately two years ago to the east of this site, considered low density residential as an appropriate use of the bluff because of the size of the houses and low density would allow more of the natural features to remain. The request for subdivision and rezoning which would allow a gradual increase in lot sizes from the top to the toe of the bluff is consistent with City policy and the Comprehensive Guide Plan for this site. Essential to the protection of the bluff is to minimize the disruption of the tree cover which provides natural slope stabilization. It is critical during the development and construction process that careful monitoring of each individual site with a detailed grading permit special erosion control be required. For the steep slopes that are not proposed to be disturbed by grading, a scenic easement should be provided which will protect the natural vegetation. This is consistent with the Timber Bluffs project. • STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS • The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the PUD concept on 65 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 65 acres with waivers, Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-44, Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Rl-13.5, Zoning District Amendment in the existing RI-22, and Preliminary Plat of 65 acres into 34 lots and 3 outlots based on plans dated Pecember 5,1991, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated December 6, 1991, and subject to the following recommendations: 1. Prior to review by the City Council proponent shall: a. b. c. Modify the preliminary plat to depict the NURP ponds as shown on the attachment. Modify the grading plan to depict alternative grading and building pad locations which would minimize the amount of retaining walls in a worst case scenario. Submit a revised tree replacement plan which depicts the majority of replacement trees to be oak, develop a reforestation plan for the large graded areas across Lots 13 and 12 . 7 '(J Staff Report Riverview Heights ( ( . ~ d, _ Modify the preliminary plat to depict conservancy easement areas on steep slopes . Modify the preliminary plat to provide an access to Riverview Road for proposed ,LotJ2. _ 2. '-Prior to final plat approval proponent shall:. a. - b. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance proponent shall provide plans with the following information: a. A site plan with a house located within the proposed pad area. b. A grading plan based on field verified topography. c. No additional retaining walls beyond the approved grading plan. d. No steepening of the natural slopes. e. Walkout levels must meet natural grade. f. No more than one 20-foot wide construction area on the down slope side of the . house. g. . Restoration and erosion control plans. h. No construction or grading in backyard conservation easement on the steep slopes. 1. Soil test. j. Engineer's design for footing, foundation, and retaining walls. 4. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. 8 l'l J • • • • • • Staff Report Riverview Heights ( ( \. . 5. Proponent shall be required to submit an archeological survey to the State Historical Society and provide a letter of acceptance thereof prior to review of this project for Second Reading by the City Council. 6. The following PUD waivers are granted: a. Lot size waivers for Lots 15, 23, 24, 25, and 32. b. Street frontage waivers for Lots 20, 21, and 22. c. Private road waiver. 7. Prior to acceptance of land as gift to the City for park purposes, proponent shall provide a Level 1 environmental audit to determine the extent of potential pollution on the site. 8. Existing Valley Oak Road must be vacated as part of the final plat. 9. Prior to any grading on the property, proponent shall be required to stake the construction limits with the snow fence. Proponent shall notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. MlKESR.MFD:bs 9 ; " December 3, 1991 Mr. Allan Gray City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Riverview Heights Dear Mr. Gray, Attached with this letter are some preliminary computer runs for storm water detention in the proposed Riverview Heights subdivision. Depending upon which curve number is used for the TR-55 computer program, I calculate that the storage required for a 100 year ~torm will be approximately 1.8 to 2.4 acre/feet. The pond that ~s ultimately built will be designed to comply as closely as possible to the Nationwide Urban Runoff Programs (NURP) criteria. • We have proposed the NURP pond to be located down within the flOOd. plain at approximately the 710 elevation. This small tree and brush area within the flood plain is still approximately 5 to 6 feet above the marshy areas of the river bottom. Michael Franzen has heard recently that it may not be possible to construct the NURP pond within the flood plain (any elevation below 722.4). If that is truly what will be required by federal or state agencies, then we would likely have to eliminate lot 19 and construct the ponding area where that lot is now located. Attached with this letter is a conceptual diagram of how the pond would work within lot 19. In both of our computer runs I have assumed a pond discharge rate of approximately equal to 1/2 the rate of the runoff for a 10 year storm. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this. snme . C i)/" n \~ (, -\ !' ' Randall . Hedlund " cc: Wally Hustad Michael Franzen 9201 East B!comlng:cn Freewav. Blocmmg:on. Minnesota 55420. Te!ecnone (612) 888-0289 Jb~/l • ... ' .---_I.J .o-C I, '-~. c. ~ • , c .",..,-~ • - -"-- ,-I', . ,"--.' -;" i " , i / .' .' _.:::. ......... -"--' '-' ... , ~ I ' -' - '\ , '. ( ( STATE OF ~rn~©U~ PHONE NO. _.~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 772-7910 FILENO. December 19, 1991 Mr. Chris Enger city of Eden Prairie Planning Department 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA RIVER, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr Enger: We have reviewed the site plans (received November 13, 1991) for the above-referenced project (Section 35, Tl16N, R22W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. The only DNR protected water on the site is the Minnesota River. It appears no activity is proposed below the top of the bank and, therefore, no DNR protected waters permit is required. 2. It appears that most of the stormwater is routed through settling basins, which is good. We would object to having the stormwater routed directly to the Minnesota River. 3. The homesites appear to be well above the 100-year flood elevation of the Minnesota River. All the work that is done for this project should comply with applicable floodplain regulations of both the city and the Lower Minnesota River Watershed Management Organization. 4. The Minnesota River has a shore land classification of Transitional. The shoreland district extends 300 feet from the top of the bank, or the width of the floodplain, which ever is greater. The development must be consistent with the city's shore land management regulations. The city is in the process of updating its shore land management ordinance to be consistent with the 1989 version of state guidelines. 5. The north portion of the project area contains bluffs (i.e. slopes that average 30 percent or greater and rise 25 feet above the top of the bank) along the Minnesota River. We understand this site was originally platted many years ago, and that the density and lot placement has already been improved in order to minimize the detrimental impacts on the AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • • • • ( ( Mr. Chris Enger (Riverview Heights) December 19, 1991 Page (2) 6. steep slopes and bluffs. Although these bluffs are apparently outside of the official shoreland district for the Minnesota River, the city is strongly encouraged to consider the shore land management bluff and steep slope standards and adhere to the following standards as closely as possible. a.The bluffs overlooking the Minnesota River should not be disturbed and all structures should be setback at least 30' from the top of the bluff. b. The vegetation and topography should be retained in a natural state in the bluff impact zone (an area within 20' of the top of the bluff). See state shoreland management guidelines and sample ordinance for more details on what can be allowed in the impact zone. c. A qualified structural or soils engineer should ensure that the structural design and placement of the houses adequately meets safety and erosion control concerns . Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. 7. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. 8. It appears there are wetlands on the site that are not under DNR jurisdiction. The u.S. Corps of Engineers should be consulted regarding pertinent federal regulations for activities in wetlands. In addition, the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act of 1991 (Chapter 354) places a moratorium on the filling of wetlands beginning January 1, 1992. The Minnesota Board of Water and Soils Resources (296-3767) should be contacted to obtain more information concerning this law . .. ( Mr. Chris Enger (Riverview Heights) December 19, 1991 Page (3) ( Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me, or Staff Hydrologist Joe Richter, at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely,':-. Ceil strauss Area Hydrologist cc: Randy Hedlund, Hedlund Planning Engineer Surveying Joe Yanta, USCOE Larry Samstad, Lower MN River WMO Wayne Barstad, DNR Ecological Services Minnesota River File • • • • • • ( D~(embl7r 5tr, Dear Eden Prairie Planning Comrnissl')fI, ( Po?t€-r ':" GJV P'X'E- 10 1541: E Pi'JET'..')!?'.'.' Dr Eden PraIrie MN 55347 Due to a pnor commltment we '.V1li be un8ble to 8tten!j the publlC ne8rmg on Monday December 9th Howe'/er, 'Ne w01J1d lH:e to register our objection to the planned develooment v,nown a:; R1VerVlp.w Helqhts. We asr that vou consIder the followmg mputs m yOIJr d07c1510n I) We consider thIs location to be one of tI)e most naturally preserveli areas left in Ed>::-n Prairie . .A.fter living in this city for nine years we selectefj this IOi:ation ('NO 'lears a~l;j because ot its r,atural beauty, wildlite and 5eclu~.lOn. 2) Eden Prairie is becoming very over developed. Original lando'Nners and planners 1);:1ve done little to preserve tile landscape from whIch Eden PrairIe takes Its name. Natural wi ldl ife areas m thIs city are bemg destroyed. 3) We do not consider parks and playqrounds to be places which enhance wildlife or Eden Prairie's reputation"for conservation. Parks anrj playgrourlds ar;:. fur,ctlOna I area5 wrilCIi are necessary to re I ieve the urban spra'w 1 'yl·mlCJi seems to mcrea31ngly be trie Eden PrairIe image. 4) Trlt' river Jft?3 cCrnsl/j~red for fjS'velopment IS one of tile few rernalflm~l natural pres'?rve are3S 1n Eljen Pr;:lJrlE' WIldlife atiol.mds, bIrds. (jeer, foxes. l)eaver, and many more can tIe founc11n tl)IS 3rn3l! sanctuary on the t-llge of U-,t' flmneso ta K 1 vE'r . ( s c H L A December 3~ 1991 Eden Prairie Planning Commission CitS:' Hall Eden Prairie. MN 55344 Gentleman: ( M p p I am writing to you in regard to a letter I received yester~ay concerning my property in Eden Prairie. Since my property borders the entire eastern perimeter of the proposed Brown/Hustad project; I feel I should have sufficient time to study the proposed zoning change and what impact it may have on the future of my property. s I am going on a buying trip tomorrow for two weeks and will not be i~ town for the .hearing. Since I will nof have the proper -time to study this proposal until I get back, I feel the ~earing I . should be postponed until I return December 15. 1991. Si ncerely, 10901 Riverview Road Eden Prairie. MN 55347 telephone I 941-9576 CALHOUN SQUARE . 3001 HENNEPIN AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 . (612) 823-7272 FAX (612) ~3-5783 r6f}..to • • • ~ .::t: •• CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING , • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Eden Prairie Planning commission will meet in the City Hall council Chamber, 7600 Executive Drive, at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, December 9, 1991, and will during said meeting conduct a public hearing on the request of Hustad Homes and Robert and James Brown for Planned unit Development Concept Review on 65 acres; Planned unit Development District Review with waivers on 65 acres; Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-13.5 on 5.7 acres; Zoning District Amendment within the Rl-22 District on 5.0 acres; zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-44 on 15.7 acres; Preliminary Plat of 65 acres into 34 single family lots, 3 outlots and road right-of-way to be known as Riverview Heights. LOCATION: South of Riverview i,Road, east of Riverview Drive East. ' LEGAL: See Reverse All comments, suggestions, and/or inquiries should be submitted in advance of the meeting or at the meeting itself. A copy of the proposed plan is on file at the city Hall Planning Departmen~ and may be inspected between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Published in the Eden prairie News on November 28, 1991. RVIEWHTS.CK • \ [I,Yr-, ~~ ~_ .J-'. ~ '~~(f.~ ~~~~~~~ • . .. t '0' :"'. ,~ . _ ................... _ ... - JANUARY 21.1992 21279 21280 21281 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM JANUARY 92 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 12/13/91 SAVINGS BOND FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 12/31/91 az82 ~83 21284 21285 21286 21287 21288 21289 21290 21291 21292 21293 21294 21295 21296 21297 21298 21299 21300 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 12/6/91 & 12/13/91 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 12/13/91 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA UNITED WAY BRINGERS BRINGERS HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR BIZMART INC 21301 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 21302 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 21303 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 21304 JON BETCHER 21305 MARY CAMPBELL 21306 KAY COURRIER ~07 SARA EGAN ""308 KATHY ENDRES 21309 KURT ERBACH 21310 DEBRA FOTH 21311 LAURA GRANROS 21312 ROGER HANKEY 21313 DENNIS LAMBERT 21314 RANAE NOBLE 21315 KYLE PATERSON 21316 KYLE ROISEN 21317 MOLLY JO SMITH 21318 LINDA SOLHEID 21319 ZACHARY STALOCH 21320 CLAUDIA WAGNER 21321 JULIE YEDONI 21322 KYLE DUCHSCHERE 21323 PETTY CASH 21324 ICMA 21325 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY 21326 MN DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 21327 MN FOR IMPROVED JUVENILE JUSTICE 21328 COOKIES BY DEB 21329 ~1N RECREATION & PARK ASSN 21330 HOPKINS POSTMASTER 21331 L M CIT .. 332 ICMA ~9708572 PAYROLL 12/13/91 & 12/6/91 PAYROLL 12/13/91 DECEMBER 91 UNION DUES PAYROLL 12/13/91 PAYROLL 12/13/91 JANUARY 92 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM PAYROLL 12/6/91 & 12/13/91 PAYROLL 12/13/91 PAYROLL 12/31/91 PAYROLL 12/13/91 EXPENSES-ELECTIONS DEPT EXPENSES-ELECTIONS DEPT CONFIRMATION FEES-FINANCE DEPT CONFIRMATION FEE-FINANCE DEPT CONFIRMATION FEE-FINANCE DEPT CONFIRMATION FEE-FINANCE DEPT -2 TRANSCRIBERS-$391/11 CASSETTE RECORDERS $659/CASSETTES-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS LICENSE-WATER DEPT CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT SERVICE REFUND-RACQUETBALL LEAGUE FEE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SLIDING-ROLLER SKATING TRIP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS - REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SLIDING-ROLLERSKATING TRIP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RENTAL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SLIDING-ROLLER SKATING TRIP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-CITY HALL BOOKS-ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE LICENSES-PARK MAINTENANCE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL BROOMBALL STATE REGISTRATION FEES POSTAGE-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER 1991 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE BOOKS-ADMINISTRATION 169118.00 200.00 81624.93 6692.00 194.76 2328.72 32.00 1129.00 50.00 25.00 189.00 6518.92 34425.18 325.63 208.25 132.00 143.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 1088.95 10.00 250.00 15848.70 2.00 16.00 22.00 18.00 2.00 22.00 22.00 18.00 17.00 37.50 19.00 18.00 22.00 22.00 17.00 22.00 11.00 2.00 150.00 66.50 52.50 225.00 20.00 35.00 11.18 165.00 2217 .50 73140.00 99.50 JANUARY 21.1992 21333 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES -1992 DIRECTORIES OF MN OFFICIALS- ADMINISTRATION DEPT 21334 21335 21336 21337 21338 21339 21340 21341 21342 21343 21344 21345 21346 21347 21348 21349 21350 21351 21352 21353 21354 21355 21356 21357 21358 21359 21360 21361 21362 21363 21364 21365 21366 DAKOTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE PROGRAM 92 WASTE DISPOSAL LICENSE FEE-STREET MAINT MN DEPT OF REVENUE DECEMBER 91 FUEL TAX AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID JASON-NORTHCO PROP LP#l JANUARY 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 12/31/91 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 12/31/91 GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE COMPANY JANUARY 92 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 12/31/91 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 12/31/91 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 12/31/91 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC JANUARY 92 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM MEDICA CHOICE JANUARY 92 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 12/31/91 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 12/31/91 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE JANUARY 92 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 12/13/91 & 12/31/91 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12/31/91 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12/31/91 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 12/31/91 PAULA BARCLAY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS DIANE BRANDABUR REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS BELINDA GRIGG REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS LINHOFF CORPORATE COLOR PRINTS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY -5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL METERS/GENERATORSIREMOTE -READERS/PRESSURE REGULATORS/VALVES/ GASKETS-WATER DEPT DANIELS PHOTOGRAPHY WORDPERFECT MAGAZINE MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY BIRTCHER WELSH AT&T AT&T AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV DELEGARD TOOL CO PRINT-POLICE DEPT SUBSCRIPTION-PARK & RECREATION DEPT CONFERENCE-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR JANUARY 92 RENT-CITY HALL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE -HALOGEN LAMPS/SCREWDRIVER SET/EXTENSION -SET/EXTENSION CORDSIWRENCHESITAIL PIPES- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21367 FEIST BLANCHARD CO -BRAKE SHOESIBRAKE DRUMSIROTORSIWHEEL 21368 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 21369 21370 21371 21372 21373 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY NORTHERN STATES POWER CO U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS FRED ZIEBOL EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 18619114 -CYLINDERSIBELTS/SEALSIBEARINGS/HOSES- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -SPROCKETS/OIL SEALSIBEARINGSIBELTS/SENSOR/ -HOSES/SHOCK ABSORBERS/FLASHERSIBATTERIES/ -NUTS & BOLTS/IGNITION COIL/SWITCHES/ -THERMOSTATS/MIRROR/POWER STEERING FLUID/ -FITTINGSIBRAKE CABLESIWATER PUMPIBRAKE -DRUMS/VOLT REGULATOR-PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINTIUTILITIES DIVISION SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE CONFERENCE ADVANCE-ENGINEERING DEPT -EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATIONIHUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 40.50 14. 51 208.00 232.00 7177.83 50.00 5766.00 2605.37 212.77 2078.72 32.00 18336.70 40345.80 50.00 25.00 2963.12 1140.00 90.00· 39936.68 208.25 22.00 20.00 17.00 6.60 3625.03 9. 14.90 5.00 22028.32 3.81 428.15 17.85 228.02 624.32 2053.39 29763.90 97.47 . 4868.84 75.00 • JANUARY 21. 1992 21374 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PESTICIDE APPLICATORS MANUALS-STREET MAINT 30.00 1 75 HOLIDAY INN-BEMIDJI CONFERENCE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT 214.64 76 RADISSON-ST CLOUD CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 104.81 77 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 11.18 21378 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC JANUARY 92 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 5117.34 21379 MN STREET SUPERINTENDENTS ASSN DUES-STREET DEPT 50.00 21380 STAN BANN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 6.00 21381 BARBARA CADOGAN REFUND-CMS SKI TRIP 15.00 21382 SUZANNE BENNETT REFUND-ADAPTIVE SWIMMING LESSONS 26.00 21383 MIKE BERGLUND REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 21384 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP MIX 133.31 21385 BEER WHOLESALERS INC BEER 3388.50 21386 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 9935.93 21387 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 24483.30 21388 HOME JUICE PRODUCTS MIX 69.12 21389 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 230.00 21390 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 13603.12 21391 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 739.88 21392 PEPS I COLA COMPANY MIX 527.80 21393 POGREBA DISTRIBUTING INC BEER 606.65 21394 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 30451.55 21395 OLD LOG THEATRE TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 217.00 21396 TRAVEL PROFESSIONALS AIRFARE FOR NLC CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL 336.50 21397 NLC CONFERENCE CONFERENCE-CITY COUNCIL 395.00 21398 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN VOLLEYBALL STATE REGISTRATION FEES 561.00 21399 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 125.00 21400 WILS-ZETA CHAPTER -CONFERENCE-PARK PLANNING DEPTIRECREATION 75.00 ADMINISTRATION/SENIOR CENTER 0.00 .01 VOID OUT CHECK 02 FEIST BLANCHARD CO EQUIPMENT PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 18.00 21403 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT -ENTERTAINMENT FOR EMPLOYEE CHRISTMAS 225.00 PARTY-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 21404 HCI CONNECTING POINT -COMPUTERIMONITOR/KEYBOARD/SOFTWARE-FIRE 1600.00 DEPT 21405 ACE BLACKTOP INC SERVICE 1991 LIME SLUDGE REMOVAL 24962.00 21406 IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS INC -SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW RD-BITTERSWEET TO 17870.81 HOWARD LANE 21407 RICHARD KNUTSON INC -SERVICE-BLUFFS WEST 9THIBLUFFS EAST 8TH/ 16194.82 -BLUESTEM RIDGEIHAWK HIGH RIDGE/CEDAR RIDGE/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION 21408 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER TABLE RENTALS-HUMAN RESOURCES 49.22 21409 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTE~1S INC LASERJET TONER CARTRIDGES-CITY HALL 46.95 21410 AIRSIGNAL INC -JANUARY 92 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/FIRE 642.00 DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER 21411 ALASKAN AIR CONDITIONING INC OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER 152.20 21412 ALEXANDER BATTERY NORTH BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT & FIRE DEPT 345.71 21413 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO -VIDEO TAPESITRAINING VIDEOS EDITEDIVIDEO 7309.25- -EDITING SYSTEM-$6920-POLICE FORFEITURE- DRUGS 21414 AMERICAN LINEN DIRECT SALES UNIFORMS-EQUIPMENT MNTCIMATS-LIGUOR STORE 89.12 21415 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO -UNIFORMS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS/FACILITIES/ 1100.78 -STREET t1AINT/PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/ COMMUNITY CENTERIMATS-LIQUOR STORES .16 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC -SIGNS/SIGNS REFURBISHED/COMPUTER SOFTWARE-STREET DEPT/PARK MAINT/COMMUNITY 5245.53 16732502 11S JANUARY 21.1992 21417 ARMOR SECURITY INC -1ST QTR 91 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 155.10 AGREEMENT-OUTDOOR CENTER 49.~ 21418 ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES 1992 DUES 21419 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS PIPE-PARK MAINTENANCE 21420 ASTLE FORD INTL INC GEARSIBRAKE DRUM & SHOES-EQUIPMENT MNTC 295.63 21421 PAT BARKER EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES 34.52 21422 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -SIGNAL LAMPSITHERMOSTATSIBATTERIES/ 676.72 -WINDSHIELD SOLVENTIHOSE CLAMPS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21423 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC ICE RINK BOARD CLEANING-COMMUNITY CENTER 375.00 21424 BIFFS INC DECEMBER 91 WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MNTC 504.00 21425 DAVE BLACK LICENSE FEEIMILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 62.50 21426 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 199.64 21427 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON -NOVEMBER 91 ANIMAL IMPOUND SERVICE-335.00 POLICE DEPT 21428 WIS BOETTCHER MINUTES-PARKS REC & NATURAL RESOURCES 47.85 21429 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING INC -SERVICE-PAVEMENT/SUBGRADE TESTING/ 11996.40 -BLUESTEM RIDGE STREET & UTILITY CONST/ -STARING LN STREET & UTILITY CONSTIBLUFFS -EAST 8TH ADDITIONIBLUFFS W 9TH ADDITION/ -CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDITIONINIGHT HAWK CIRCLE CUL DE SAC 21430 BROADWAY AWARDS PLAGUESITROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 56.00 21431 BRW INC -SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW RD CONSTRUCTION/DELL 46184.52 ROAD FINAL DESIGN 21432 BSN SPORTS TARGET ARROWS-DAY CAMP PROGRAM 214.50 21433 NATE BUCK VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 525.00 21434 BURNSVILLE SANITARY CO WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINTENANCE 117 21435 JIM CARLSON LEASING CO VEHICLE LEASE-POLICE DEPT 22 0 21436 CASE POWER & EQUIPMENT SPROCKETIRING/CHAIN-EQUIPMENT MNTC 22 . 1 2i437 CEDAR RIDGE DESIGN ORNAMENTS-HUMAN RESOURCES 87.50 21438 CENTRAIRE INC -REPLACED TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER-STARING 142.30 LAKE PARK 21439 CHROMATIC CONCEPTS SIGN-POLICE DEPT 17.25 21440 AARON CLARK VOLLEYBALL & BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 30.00 21441 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC -SPRINGSIWHEEL CYLINDERS/SEALSIBRAKE 915.69 -DRUMS & MOUNTINGS/PURGE VALVE KITS/CLUTCH . ASSEMBLY/CARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21442 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION -SERVICE-CONCRETE PLANT INSPECTIONS-VALLEY 262.12 VIEW ROAD EXTENSION 21443 COMMUNICATIONS WORLD NW JACKS/PVC CABLE-POLICE DEPT 157.76 21444 COMPUTER BUYING SERVICE PRINTER REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 87.00 21445 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC DISPENSING CANS-SAFETY DEPT 377.42 21446 COPIES NOW CITY MAPS-ELECTIONS 6.00 21447 COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS INC 3 FACSIMILE MACHINES-FIRE STATIONS 3992.00 21448 COpy EQUIPMENT INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES/COPIER REPAIR-ENGINEERING 419.43 DEPT 21449 CORPORATE GRAPHICS INTL ICR DISPATCH CARDS-POLICE DEPT 1526.05" 21450 CROWN MARKING INC DATE STAMPER REPAIRED-ENGINEERING DEPT 15.75 21451 CYS UNIFORMS NAME TAGS-POLICE DEPT 35.00 21452 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES/FAN BELTIBEARINGS/ 203.11 GASKETS-COMMUNITY CENTER 21453 HILLARY DEPARDE -ART CLASS INSTRUCTOR-PERFORMING ARTS 2i1l0 INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 21454 EUGENE DIETZ DECEMBER 91 EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT 2 0 7783499 \<tC, JANUARY 21.1992 21455 DIVERSIFIED CLEANING SERVICE CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORE 501.50 21456 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU -EXPENSES-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY CENTER/ 84.15 .57 OUTDOOR CENTER DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 21.41 21458 DRISKILLS SUPER VALU EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 93.71 21459 E P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT 45.21 21460 EDEN INCENTIVES & PROMOTIONS 911 TELEPHONE MAGNETS/STICKERS-POLICE DEPT 553.00 21461 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL/ADMINSTRATION DEPT 32.00 21462 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 44.80 21463 THE EDEN PRAIRIE GARDEN CLUB -TRANSFER GARDEN CLUB BALANCE TO EDEN 1414.94 PRAIRIE GARDEN CLUB 21464 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 125.00 21465 JEFF ELWELL MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 20.00 21466 ENVI RO-TECH HAY BALES-STREET MAINTENANCE 15.00 21467 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 57.27 21468 BRAD ERICKSEN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 120.00 21469 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 63.00 21470 FIRE ENGINEERING SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 138.25 21471 FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 111.93 21472 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME CO SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 576.00 21473 FOCUS 1 HOUR PHOTO -FILM PROCESSING-HUMAN RESOURCES/ASSESSING 176.23 DEPT 21474 FOUR STAR BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 454.75 21475 G & K SERVICES COVERALLS/MOP HEADS-PARK MNTCIWATER DEPT 560.36 21476 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC LIABILITY INSURANCE 755.30 21477 NORBERT GERNES REFUND-DUPLICATE PAYMENT ON METER REPAIR 90.11 21478 GLEN LAKE SALES SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 109.75 21479 GME CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE-CONCRETE TESTING ON JOINER WAY 479.58 .80 GNERER WELDING INC -CUTTING BAR/MARKERS/CYLINDERS-EQUIPMENT 258.45 MAINTENANCE/SEWER DEPT 21481 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC DECEMBER 91 EXPENSES-SOLID WASTE MGMT 2012.50 21482 LEROY GUBA HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 80.00 21483 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC -STREET LIGHTING REPAIR/FLOOD LAMPS-STREET 1357.11 DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE 21484 H & H PUBLICATION EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES 450.00 21485 MICHAEL W HAMILTON BASKETBALL & BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PD 291.00 21486 ROBERT HANNON HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PD 46.00 21487 HANCE HARDWARE AUTO HEAT TAPE-PARK MAINTENANCE 33.99 21488 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW RD & TOPVIEW RD/ 23654.51 -BLUESTEM RIDGEIHAWK HIGH RIDGEIBRAXTON RD/ -EDEN HILLS NEIGHBORHOODIBLUFFS E 8TH -ADDITIONIBLUFFS W 9TH ADDITION/CEDAR -RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDITIONIBLUFFS E 11TH ADDITION 21489 HAROLD CHEVROLET GEARSIWASHERS-WATER DEPT 161.50 21490 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO COUPLING/CROSS ASSEMBLY-EQUIPMENT MNTC 477.10 21491 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 25.50 21492 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEE-PLANNING DEPT 78.00· 21493 HENNEPIN CTY TREASURER POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATION 150.75 21494 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER NOVEMBER 91 BOARD OF PRISONERS 3323.58 21495 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEE-ENGINEERING DEPT 337.50 21496 HENNEPIN COUNTY REPAYMENT OF HOUSING REHAB LOAN FUNDS 3166.00 21497 D C HEY COMPANY INC -TONER-BUILDING INSPECTIONSIMAINTENANCE 113.45 .98 AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT HOFFERS INC PAINTITHINNERIROLLER COVER-PARK MNTC 63.26 4272345 11:n JANUARY 21.1992 21499 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC PAINT/COMPRESSOR OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER 81.89 21500 IACCI 1992 DUES-POLICE DEPT 40.00 21501 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #272 ROOM RENTAL-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 130. 21502 INSTY-PRINTS DOG LICENSE APPLICATION FORM-ANIMAL CONTROL 27 21503 IALEP TREASURER 1992 DUES-POLICE DEPT 20.00 21504 ISA 1992 DUES-FORESTRY DEPT 85.00 21505 lAAO PUBLICATIONS-ASSESSING DEPT 27.00 21506 IPMA MN 1992 DUES-HUMAN RESOURCES 45.00 21507 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC -SHAFT/PLATE/GASKETS IRI NGS/BOLTS/SEALS/ 443.00 -THERMOSTATS/SLEEVEIREPLACED BEARINGS & SEALS IN DRIVE PLATE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21508 H MARTIN JESSEN MILEAGEIEXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 69.05 21509 JOHNSON CONTROLS FILTER/SERVICE ROLL-COMMUNITY CENTER 236.45 21510 E F JOHNSON CO -5 PORTABLE RADIO $3000.00-POLICE DEPT/ 7051.75 -MOBILE RADIOIBATTERIESIBELT LOOPS/SWIVELS- $4052-FIRE DEPT 21511 JUNKIN SAFETY APPLIANCE CO 2 FLOTATION COLLARS-FIRE DEPT 427.30 21512 KREATIVE ACRYLICS BROCHURE RACK-COMMUNITY CENTER 255.00 21513 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 710.04 21514 LAMETTRYS COLLISION BUMPER END CAPS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 134.80 21515 JOHN LANDERS -ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR/ 28.48 FEES PAID 21516 CINDY LANENBERG MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT 60.75 21517 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC -SERVICE-COMPARABLE WORTH SUPPORT & 1673.75 CONSULTATION-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 21518 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD NOVEMBER 91 SERVICE-CABLE TV 225.00 21519 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 180.24 21520 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC DECEMBER 91 LEGAL SERVICE-LANDFILL 854_ 21521 LAW ENFORCEMENT TV NETWORK NETWORK INSTALLATION-POLICE DEPT 67 21522 LOTUS SUBSCRIPTION-ENGINEERING DEPT 1 . 21523 LUNDS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 52.99 21524 LYMAN LUMBER CO LUMBER-PARK MAINTENANCE 21.20 21525 M-V GAS CO PROPANE CYLINDERS-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 360.00 21526 MARKS HWY 5 AMOCO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16.48 21527 GEORGE MARSHALL SERVICE-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY 250.00 21528 MASYS CORPORATION -FEBRUARY 92 COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1282.00 AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 21529 MAXWELL MACMILLAN -EMPLOYMENT LAW/COMPLIANCE & PERSONNEL 899.82 POLICIES MANUALS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 21530 JULIA MCFADDEN -SERVICE-AQUATICS SUPERVISORIRECREATION 810.81 ADMINISTRATION 21531 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC -EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/COMMUNITY 201.62 CENTER/SENIOR CENTER 21532 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 122.40 21533 MENARDS -LOCKIWIRE-COMMUNITY CENTERIWINTER SKILL 11.44 DEVELOPt1ENT PROGRAM 21534 MERLINS HARDWARE HANK -KEYSINUTS & BOLTSIUTILITY KNIVES/OIL/ 397.37 -BLADESITAPE/SHOWER CURTIN & LINERIWASHERS/ -LOCKS/SCREWSIMOUSE TRAPS/DOOR STOPS/ OUTLETS-PARK MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 21535 MERRIMAC CONSTRUCTION REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 292.44' 21536 A MEAT SHOPPE EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 177.07 21537 METRO PRINTING INC VOTER INFORMATION FLYERS-ELECTIONS DEPT 592.00 21538 METROPOLITAN AREA MGMT ASSN DUES-CITY COUNCIL 1_ 21539 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTO SINK DRAIN REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 2821716 l~t6 JANUARY 21.1992 21540 KAREN MICHAEL EXPENSESIMILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 63.71 21541 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO -REPLACED SANDER SPREADER TROUGH-EQUIPMENT 253.36 .42 MAINTENANCE MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/LIQUOR STORE/ 604.56 CONMUNITY CENTER 21543 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC GASKET-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6.22 21544 MINNCOMM PAGING JANUARY 92 PAGER SERVICE-STREET MAINT 22.50 21545 MPLS AREA ASSN OF REALTORS SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT 122.69 21546 l1N PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN DUES-PARK MAINTENANCE 15.00 21547 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIGUOR STORES 356.43 21548 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT BOND PAPERITONER-ENGINEERING DEPT 368.80 21549 l1N CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -EXTINQUISHERS/FLASHLIGHTS/AIR MASK BAGS/ 20948.70 -RATCHET WRENCHES/KNEE BOOTS/SPANNER BELTS/ -FIRE CALCULATOR/25 SETS TURNOUT GEAR- -$13950/SCUBA GEAR-$5290-FIRE DEPT/ EXTINGUISHER RECHARGING-COMMUNITY CENTER 21550 l1N STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN DUES-FIRE DEPT 190.00 21551 l1N SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 80.00 21552 MISCO INC COMPUTER GLARE SHIELDS-SAFETY DEPT 337.31 21553 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 7.00 21554 Wl1 MUELLER & SONS INC SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL DEPT 1671.71 21555 MUNICILITE CO -SPOTLIGHTSIHANDLE ASSEMBLIES/STROBE 1158.82 -LIGHTS/CONTROL BOX/LAMPS/CABLE-EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21556 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE VIDEO CAMERA & ACCESSORIES-FIRE DEPT 1385.00 21557 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSN DUES-RECREATION SUPERVISOR 125.00 21558 JAN NELSON -MINUTES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMM/CITY 225.00 COUNCIL .59 NORTH STAR ICE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 214.71 60 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE-ANCHORED POLE AT VALLEY VIEW RD 1604.90 21561 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO LIGHT BULBS/FIXTURES-FIRE DEPT 253.01 21562 NORTHWEST ASPHALT REFUND-WIDRANT METER DEPOSIT 560.76 21563 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC CABLE ASSEMBLY/CABLE CLIPS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 40.84 21564 PAPER WAREHOUSE -CANDLESITABLE COVERS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/ 53.20 COMMUNITY CENTER 21565 P C EXPRESS INC -MONITOR-POLICE DEPT/COMPUTER SOFTWARE-1261.00 FIRE DEPT 21566 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC -DRIVE LINE ASSEMBLYIHYDRAULIC VALVES-191.45 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21567 PEPSI COLA COMPANY -CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ICE RINKS 365.00 PROGRM~/COMMUNITY CENTER 21568 G C PETERSON MACHINERY CO INC BELT & DISC SANDER-PARK MAINTENANCE 1149.00 21569 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 30.00 21570 PIN EXPRESSIONS LAPEL PINS-POLICE DEPT 297.00 21571 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -FURNISHED & INSTALLED MOTION SENSOR FOR 649.35 -FIXTURES-PARK MAINTIREPAIRED LOCKERROOM -LIGHTS/INSTALLED CONTROL SWITCH-COMMUNITY CENTER 21572 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PERMIT FORMS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 237.20 21573 JOHN PRZYl1US -SERVICE-GOLF LESSONS-SUMMER & FALL SKILL 420.75 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 21574 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 47.40 21575 RAINBOW FOODS -EXPENSES-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMIHISTORICAL 71.89 .76 INTERPRETATION PROGRAM SCOTT REIN VOLLEYBALL & BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 262.00 3565127 r~g JANUARY 21.1992 21577 TED REIN BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 68.00 21578 RES WATER WELL & -WELL ABANDONHENTS-RILEY LAKE PK/STARING 1090.00 LAKE PARK .7 21579 P RESBERG INC REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 21580 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN -CASH REGISTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/CASH 1154.75 REGISTER TAPE-LIQUOR STORES . 21581 JOHN E RHETTS PHD SERVICE-HYPNOSIS CONSULTATION-POLICE DEPT 450.00 21582 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-ROWLAND RD STORM STREET & SEWER 53812.38 -CONSTIMITCHELL RD CONST/STARING LN & SUNRISE CIRCLE STREET & UTILITY DESIGN 21583 RITZ CAMERA -FILM/FILM PROCESSING-ENGINEERING DEPT/ 760.17 -POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPTIRECREATION ADMIN/ 3 CAMERA-$600-FIRE DEPT 21584 ROLLINS OIL CO UNLEADED FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7064.33 21585 S & M BUILDERS INC -CARPENTRY & ELECTRICAL SERVICE-HOUSING 2019.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 21586 ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 272.00 21587 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO OFFICE SUPPLIES-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM 20.71 21588 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 81.64 21589 SANDY SCHIPPER AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 149.50 21590 CARRIE SCHULBERG MILEAGE/EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 21.50 21591 RON SCHWARTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 180.00 21592 SEARS TABLE TENNIS PADDLES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 41.96 21593 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC SWEATSHIRTS-FIRE DEPT 1695.00 21594 SIGNATURE HOME OF CARMEL REFUND-OVERPAYMENT BUILDING PERMIT 400.00 21595 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER -PRINTING-JANUARY & FEBRUARY SENIOR CENTER 487.00 NEWSLETTER 21596 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC SIDE BOARDS FOR DUMP BOXES-STREET MAINT 158.40 21597 ANN SLAWSON MIELAGE-SENIOR CENTER 1.~ 21598 GARRETT D SMELTZER SCHOOL-COMMUNITY CENTER 21599 W GORDON SMITH CO -GREASE/GAS/HYDRAULIC FLUID-PARK MAINT/ 334.15 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21600 EDWARD SORENSON BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 68.00 21601 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC -LEGAL ADS-PLANNING DEPT/ADVERTISING-555.86 LIQUOR STORES 21602 SPORTS WORLD USA SWEATSHIRTS-LIQUOR STORE 194.04 21603 STAIRMASTER EXERCISE SYSTEMS FREIGHT CHARGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 6.76 21604 JOAN STRASBURG BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 117.00 21605 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ AMMUNITION-POLICE DEPT 857.25 21606 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC -SERVICE-DELL RD DESIGNIHWY 5 FRONTAGE RD/ 3383.53 MITCHELL LAKE SANITARY SEWER 21607 NATALIE SWAGGERT EXPENSES-HUMAJ~ RESOURCES DEPT 30.19 21608 BRAD SWANSON HOCKEY & BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 244.00 21609 TANK RE-NU OF MN GAS TANK REPAIR-EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 110.00 21610 RANDY THOMPSON EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 36.00 21611 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC VINYL LETTERS-POLICE DEPT 24.61 21612 TOLL COMPANY SAW/CUT OFF WHEEL/GUIDES-PARK MAINTENANCE 321.45 21613 RONALD TOSKEY BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 68.00 21614 TOWER ASPHALT INC BLACKTOP-STREET MAINTENANCE 118.80 21615 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE 13500.00 21616 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO -OXYGEN/ACETYLENE/CHISEL & BRUSH/CARBON 271.96 -DIOXIDE CYLINDERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/ COMMUNITY CENTER 21617 TWIN CITY TESTING SERVICE-CYLINDER TESTING-VALLEY VIEW ROAD .00 9050131 \00 JANUARY 21.1992 21618 21619 1 20 2 621 21622 21623 21624 21625 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED V & S ENTERPRISES VICOM INC VIKING LABORATORIES INC VOSS LIGHTING WARNING LITES OF MN WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY 21626 WATERITE INC 21627 WEBSTER HOME INSULATION INC 21628· SANDRA F WERTS 21629 WEST WELD 21630 WESTENBERG HOMES INC 21631 ROBERTA WICK 21632 BILL WYFFELS 21633 ZACKS INC 21634 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 20948 VOID OUT CHECK 20929 VOID OUT CHECK 21149 VOID OUT CHECK 21268 VOID OUT C~RCK 2272'+99 • • UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT -PARTIAL PAYMENT FOR STORM SEWER EASEMENT- CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CTR CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER . LIGHT BULBS-PARK MAINTENANCE ROLL-UP SIGNS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE -GENERATORS/210 5/8 X 3/4 100 GAL METERS- $10710/204 COPPERHORNS-$3672-WATER DEPT PUMP SEALS-COMMUNITY CENTER -INSULATION INSTALLATION-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM MILEAGE/EXPENSES-SENIOR PROGRAMS -ELECTRODESIWELDING WIRES-PARK MAINT/ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REFUND-OVERPAYMENT BUILDING PERMIT MINUTES-CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT CLEANING SUPPLIES-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT -1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/STREET MAINT/ COMMUNITY CENTER 609.81 944.30 7500.00 14.00 162.50 146.40 1129.00 14458.00 38.40 876.00 45.88 483.97 500.00 154.58 12.73 290.60 308.95 189.00- 1088.95- 6.70- 3665.48- $1048255.05 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 15 LIQUOR STORE-P V M 17 LIQUOR STORE-PRESERVE 20 CEMETERY OPERATIONS 21 POLICE DRUG FORFEITURE 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 51 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 57 ROAD IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 60 IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 62 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 73 WATER FUND 77 SEWER FUND 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 87 CDBG FUND $1048255.05 528051.19 427.30 63913.64 37571.39 250.00 6920.00 8485.99 54890.73 2366.83 84013.24 32607.78 50428.98 169768.96 2490.02 6069.00 • • • p. .I _----------WE'VE GOT SPACE TO FILL----------_, January 16, 1992 Mr. Doug Tenpas Mayor City of Eden Prairie 1600 Executive Drive -cdenPrairie, .MN 55J44 ·Dear Doug: . . -. Itrs a pleasure to bring before the Planning Commission and City Council our newest project, which is a design-build corporate headquarters for Normark Corporation. There are not that many new development opportunities in today's market, so we feel doubly fortunate to be associated with such a fine company as Normark. I have been working with Ron Weber (PresIdent and founder of NormarkJ for .six years. We have looked at many sites and buildings over this time. Although he has many alternatives to choose from, this location within Technology Park is his preferred building site. We have spent hundreds of hours designing a building whiCh will fit on this most difficult site. ~ny development constraints have impacted this design, including topography, soils, setbacks and wetlands. We will need to do some grading on City owned property to the north (this is the hill wnich we donated to the City 12/27186); we will be restoring any disturbed areaS during construction. The proximity to the Creek requires us to do grading and slope work in the creek/wetlands area. We will do this work in accordance with Army Corps, Nine Mile Creek Watershed, and City of Eden . Prairie requirements. This grading and site work is necessary, given the tight site constraints. Ultimately, Ron was concerned with how this new building might blend in with the natural creek-side environment. I think the flnal pro- duct is a success and shows what an owner-user can achieve with a well-thought out planning process. We and our consultants have had many meetings with City Staff. They have been supportive of the project while respecting the various rules and regulations that have to be dealt with. Through this process we have identified several key issues. We think we have been responsive to these wetlands and setback issues, although our development budget has been stretched further than planned. We are asking the City to assist this project with tax increment financing. This assistance will be used solely to defray the extraordinary site development costs caused by the unusual constraints. other regulatory agencies have been dealt with including the DNR Army Corps and Nine Mile Creek WaterShed. We are working with the Watershed to confirm that we are exempt from the new wetlands mitigation legislation. The other approvals appear to be in hand. HOYT PROPERTIES, INC. 7825 WASHINGTON AVE. SOUTH. SUITE 675. SLOOMINGTON, MN 55439. i612) 941·8200 FAX: (612) 941-8232 January 16, 1992 Mr. Doug Tenpas, ____ _ --Page Two" .--.. ... -.--. - This projects represents an aesthetic improvement over previously approved office buildings on this sensitive site. We are requesting a zoning district change from Office to Industrial to accommodate this corporate headquarters. ~lthough this building will not maximize the development potential of the site in terms of size, I can't imagine a better building for Normark. Given the fact that Normark's business is distribution of fishing lures and equipment, I think the site.and the user are a perfect match. We are confident that we can work together to bring Normark and its fine employees to Eden Prairie. Very truly yours, HOYT PROPERTIES, INC. SBHllap • • • TOTAL P.03 .1 • • • JHN-1D-~~ fHU 16:49 LHNG PHULY G~~G~~~UN ORDINANCE NO. L-9~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTIONS 4.01, SUBD. 9, 4.02, SUBD. 0, 4.07, 4.12, SUBD. 1., ADDING SECTION 4.29 AND RENUMBERING SECTION 4. 30 AND AMENDING SECTlONS 4.32, SUBD. 4,4.34, 4.51, SUBD. 6, 4.54, 4.71, SUBD. 6., AND 4.73 AND 'ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.99 WHICH A~ONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIR!E, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 4.01, Subd. 9 is amended to read as follows: "subd. 9. IOff-sale' means the retail sale of beer or l1quor or retail sale and delivery of beer in original packages for consumption off or away from the premises where sold." Section 2. City Code Section 4.02, Subd. 8 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 8. Persons Disqualified. In addition to any other provision of law, no person shall qualify for a license under this Chapter who has been convicted within the past five (5) years of violating any law relating to the manufacture, sale or distribution of beer, liquor or wine or whose license therefor has been revoked within such period of time. Nor shall any person qualify as a licensee who has not attained the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law.1I Section 3. fOllows: Ci ty Code section 4.07 is amended to read as "Section 4.07. PREMISES LICENSED. unless expressly stated therein, a license issued under the provisions of this Chapter shall be valid only in the compact and contiguous building or structure situated on the premises described 1n the license and all transactions relating to a sale under such license must take place within such building or structure, except for the delivery of off-sale beer." Section 4. City Code Section 4.12, Subd. 1. is amended to read as follows: "Section 4.12. LICENSE CONDITION AND UNLAWFUL ACT. Subd. 1. All premises and delivery vehicles of a licensee licensed under this Chapter shall at all times be open to inspection by any police officer to determine whether or not this Chapter and all other laws are being observed. All persons, as a condition to being issued -1- IC1J , I such license, consent to such inspection by such officers and without a warrant for searches or seizures." Section 5 . City Code Section 4.30 is renumbered to add Section 4.29 and shall read as follows: "Section 4.29. BEER LICENSE REQUIRED. It is unlawful for any person to sell, or keep or offer for sale any beer without a license therefor from the City. This Section shall not apply to sales by manufacturers to _wholesalers or to sales by wholesalers to persons licensed by the City to sellon-sale or off-sale beer or intoxicating liquors, nor shall this Section apply to sales to the public by persons licensed by the City to sellon-sale or off-sale intoxicating liquors." Section 6. City Code Section 4.30 is amended to read as follows: • "Section 4.30. DELIVERY OF BEER. BY OFF-SALE LICENSEES. Only delivery vehicles owned by the holder of an off-sale beer license may be used to transport beer for the purpose of delivery. Licensees engaged in delivery of beer must furnish evidence of dram shop insurance in the sum required in Section 4.14 of this Chapter upon submitting an application for license renewal." • Section 7. City Code section 4.32, Subd. 4. is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 4. NO person who has not attained the minimum age for consumption of alcoholiC beverages permitted by law shall be employed to sell or serve beer in anyon-sale establishment or deliver beer for any off-sale licensee. II section 8. City Code Section 4.34 is amended to read as follows: "Section 4.34. UNLAWFUL ACTS (BEER.). For the purpose of this Section, any person under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law shall be considered a minor. It is unlawful for any:" Section 9. City Code Section 4.51, Subd. 6 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 6. No person under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law shall be employed upon premises or in any rooms constituting the same except that persons under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law may be employed as mUSiCians or to -2-• • • • ,_, .L ........ ,_' ........ _"' "_I I ..i.. "_' I ... J ..... perform the duties of a busboy or dishwashing services in places defined as a restaurant, hotel or motel." Ci ty Code Section 4.54 is amended to read as section 10. follows: "Section 4.54. UNLAWFUL ACTS (LIQOOR). For the purpose of this Section, any person under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law shall be considered a minor. It 1s unlawful for any:" section 11. City Code section 4.71, Subd. 6 is amended. to read as follows: "Subd. 6. No person under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law shall be employed upon premises or in any rooms constituting the same except that persons under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholiC beverages permitted by law may be employed as musicians or to perform the duties of a busboy or dishwashing services in places defined as a restaurant. Persons under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law may be employed as waiters or waitresses in places defined as a restaurant, hotel or motel to serve food in rooms in which only wine is sold on-sale provided they shall not be permitted to serve or sell wine." section 12. follows: Ci ty Code Section 4.73 1s amended to read as "Section 4.73. UNLAWFUL ACTS (WINE). For the purpose of this Section, any person under the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages permitted by law shall be considered a minor. It is unlawful for any;" Section 13. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General ProviSions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penal ty for Violation" and Section 4.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 14. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication . -3- FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the ~ City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1992. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _____________ , 1992. -4- ____ day of ~ ~ • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-27 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 4-92 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 4-92 was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st of January, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. 4-92, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. C. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 331.07. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. 4-92 shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within twenty days after said publication. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 21st of January, 1992. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • res92-2S CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNFSOTA ORDINANCE NO. 4-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNFSOTA, AMENDING COTU CPDE SECTOPMS 4.01, SUBD. 9, 4.02, SUBD. 8, 4.07, 4.12, SUBD. 1., ADDING SECTION 4.29 AND RENUMBERING SECTION 4.30 AND AMENDING SECTIONS 4.32, SUBD. 4, 4.34, 4.51, SUBD. 6, 4.54, 4.71, SUBD. 6, AND 4.73 AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPI'ER 1 AND SECTION 4.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNFSOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This Ordinance amends sections of the City Code relating to Itoff-sale lt transactions of alcoholic beverages. It allows the issuance of a license for sale of non-intoxicating beer (3.2 % alcohol by volume) from delivery vehicles owned by the business or individual to whom the license is issued. The Ordinance sets out a number of qualifications needed to obtain such a license. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane, City Clerk /s/ Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the 30th day of January 1992. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from the City Clerk.) ord4-92 • •