Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/02/1993 AGENDA • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Community Training Room 8080 Mitchell Road COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Council Recorder PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL • PRESENTATION BY COUNCILMEMBER PATRICIA PIDCOCK I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS DE BUSINESS H. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, Page 2355 1993 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST Page 2361 B. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF DELLWOOD ESTATES Page 2362 C. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF PETER ANDREA 2ND Page 2364 ADDITION D. AUTHORIZE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Page 2366 AGREEMENT WITH AEC ENGINEERING FOR 2.0 MILLION GALLON ELEVATED TANK I City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 2, 1993 • Page Two E. APPROVAL OF BID FOR DEMOLITION OF HOUSE AND GARAGE Page 2370 LOCATED AT 8018 EDEN ROAD F. OPTIMISTS REQUEST TO SELL CHRISTMAS TREES AT ROUND Page 2371 LAKE PARK G. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEITED Page 2374 LAND V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. VACATION 93-08s PART OF THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY Page 2 380 EASEMENT OVER LOTS 3 AND 4. BLOCK 1. D+ '1 i S ADDITION (Resolution) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 2383 VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION APPROVING LAWS OF MINNESOTA 1993, CHAPTER Page ilk 230. RELATING TO TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT ON 1-494 B. 1ST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE Page 2387 REGARDING USE OF BICYCLE WAYS VII I. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMTITEES X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Set Tuesday. November 23. 7:00 PM. for the City Council Workshop C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL • RESOURCES City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 2, 1993 Page Three • D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY G. REPORT OF FINANCE DIRECTOR 1. Third Quarter Budget Status Report Page 2390 XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT • • i � , k t Pit:A��C T'Y O1JN '�3_:. � a 4 "fi a g illtrsi) AY, OCTOBER 19,41993 7:30 PM, C T ' Ham.COU C: u 7:3° Executive z z x &�Nn. ;i ,,`t hods ' - , OU CILMF.MBERS; Mayor Dougl Tenpas,Richard nder qt � ; Jessen, and P Piddock _ :x, `, z f': � «: TY COUNCIL STAFFt • 3.; City Manager + J. ,Aam t , -, !� • Dawson, City, Attorney Roger Pt, ' 3 = n; Franc,Dir�ctot c(Comrnu ty Dk t s, ; of Parks wong ' °# ` of Public W ,, 1 } S/ '-'Y�la'.11P^ � ! ',�„y`AP. .� $F Yam`!" EDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND LOLL CALL ' .. # � fs ; fir , Acting Mayor Anderson called the meeting to order at 7 30 gym. T "'' �u� PROCLAMATION FOR MANUFACTURERSWEEK.*oCT Fdt` s�22, Acting Mayor Anderson pros- presented a n for '1�Ve k ► 4 he Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce. ., I, :AP�ROY�I,OF� EJ DA AID ,,,,,,,,,,,„ ..,,,,,,,,,,,,„.„:„,,,.,, ,...,,,,„: T :O ' " ' 4 Pidz ck added item Xi.A.1: �Vlidwes Asphalt O r o A „add i t�: it r ommkcl A g,and ite i XIA.3., 'C `> � 7, `'°. XI.E.2., Welihouse - ►Center; , '`< ' S MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded ley Harris, to- ppra e t e age. la s i d ` t 'motion carried unanimously ` U. � €?DIUM � �r , x There were no items presented daring his portion ,the 144.21410:;:y:,,. ., '---:-- -: :_ -.:.-;--L.:,:-„.i,,y:::::::::: ::,,,:iv,,,,„,_,..„,:,.,ri„.4,,, ,::... ,.:._:;;-.,,r;s44-..,T-: IN a • A. JOINT CITY COUN RIG OJ ,y � SEPTEMBER 21 1993 , £ ' MOTION: lessen moved, dad by Pi ' y`o t 7 '"r�'���� ���a.P AIM: � '�^^�!3T �v�� ` P A .i �„� 6 P,Y joint meeting.between the City Council and Hinnan Rights C mitLoe. 4 1.vote, with Harris abstaining. • . , ., S 2355 x W '� k City Council Minutes _ } r�0' �L T Y TEB R,g, - ".B. CITY' 3UNC�L A � MOTION: Pid k moved, seconded to rove the u es meeting, with ; amendment as follows: item` X.A.2,` Styf: : CouncilR m, last with'4h, last sentence to read: "Anderson and ' , , ` z the.r o t nd n corm tittee: . " Motion c tt -0-•3._v � s A• +owes LICENSE T ` B. 2ND g rING OFORDINANCE NO. 41- 3 D1N trIT CODE # . , SON 3.75• TOSTABLI 4VI WAT$ , ;t NI AP ''ROVE SUMMARY.= R� '' N a R r ,, C. y 1 y r� t� p S .,$.: :V. 1_ .i: - -�. , ;rj"..[' !.. r,s 1 • -. a-:l :. u, , - ��4 ,# R` #A,y„ YP aF R� ,,�',, C. \ ia1i �0 ti - ,�r1►�R' ...4. art ��` ; "e ' C 93-5307 , . , - ',, � r south of West 62noi Street and east of Industry Boulevard)°,-V.. .---. •:. -.,:,',--,!--,,,,-.':-,---.T- J'';.:::::r,:c4''-.,,,,;T;;::.;;..;4'.i.-,.,,'..,,,t;i-:::,;-;.'''':' E. S�QLUTJON - UNFUNDED 4 -- `,- F. PETER ANDR STH ADDITION by.I y'Andrea. 2 Rfig of f � � I . District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 8.89 acres and from u .:to -1-4 ° `; !s,,,.,:;:i:,,,,,,.:;:::::::,,:f.?.:,..?;s2 Approval of a Developer's went ftif Peter An drt-Midst' ttcn�t, Road and Bryant a Drive. (O o ct .` m r x • trotan .ta 1t =44) . V. '?'.4 t`if fT D�I`JT"'• a .I L 1i1 1 kT M1'' ICED nA 91,-/ "Y �3 Yi. 2 EY.: * $ # k '? 3 ,4H 3i-.T Ir TY OF, F.I}F,N , yy • f yyyy� ryrya �3t ,. H. i._... .L . .!! * iA, 1,t.� e 1 .i_.S.' !k .1F T�-i {�,�. i 7 T� 7,0 '..7 i,'.'^L,4 '° ;4 4` ,,a x b, ' ~, ,. ve.ATE,444rst IMPROVEMENT, LG. 93=3337 I. �N AUTIIQ CLAN :WA' , F �I�ATIO�+i DESIGNATING 1'R . J. CAE QRIIER FOR I I PARK - _- • � � � Counod2members discussed item I. and agreedthat the its should be ' z �,kandNatural R s`Commission. E� 'y f 'M YA. b 2� d MOTION: P moved, seconded by.' Ear , to ipp�e items'A. I„ ' directing Staff to refer item I. to theParks Recreation and t review and recommendations. Motion c Ied unanimously. 1 City Council Minutes 3 October 19, 1993 .V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. SHADY OAK RIDGE 4TH ADDITION by Joe Ruzic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.28 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.28 acres into 4 lots. Location: Northwest corner of Rowland Road and Old Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from October 5, 1993 This item has been continued for several meetings in order to work out locations for a water line and fire hydrant. Joe Ruzic, developer, explained concerns regarding responsibility for payment of a fire hydrant within the vicinity of his property. Gray explained the position of the City regarding the water extension to the property and the proposed alternatives regarding the location of the watermain. After further discussion, Council directed Staff to continue working with Ruzic regarding the fire hydrant. Councilmembers also expressed concern that, no matter what the preferred alternative was for location of the hydrant, fire service must be available to the homestead site in any case. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to continue this item to November 16th pending resolution of the watermain and fire hydrant issue as it related to this development and fire protection for the existing home on the property. Motion carried unanimously. B. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING Gray reviewed the details of each of the special assessment rolls proposed. I.C. 52-189 - Street & Utility Improvements on Braxton Road There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the public hearing and approve the assessment roles for I.C. 52-189, street and utility improvements on Braxton Road. Motion carried unanimously. I.C. 52-194 - Street & Utility Improvements in the Creek Knolls Plat There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Jessen, to close the public hearing and approve the assessment roles for I.C. 52-194, street and utility improvements in the Creek Knolls plat. Motion carried unanimously. I.C. 52-256 - Utility & Street Improvements in the Bluffs East 12th Addition • There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the public hearing and approve the assessment roles for I.C. 52-256, utility and street improvements in the Bluffs East 12th Addition. Motion carried unanimously. 2c'7 City Council Minutes 4 October 19, 1993 I.C. 52-272 - Storm Sewer Improvements in Bluffs East 6th._7th. and 11th Additions 40 There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to close the public hearing and approve the assessment rolls for I.C. 52-272 for storm sewer improvements to Bluffs East 6th, 7th, and 11th Additions. Motion carried unanimously. I.C. 52-282 - Street & Utility Improvements in Shores of Mitchell Lake Estates There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to close the public hearing and approve the assessment rolls for I.C. 52-282 for street and utility improvements in the Shores of Mitchell Lake Addition. Motion carried unanimously. I.C. 52-284 - Street & Utility Improvements on Berger Drive and Lakeshore Drive There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to close the public hearing and approve the assessment rolls for I.C. 52-284, street and utility improvements on Berger Drive and Lakeshore Drive. Motion carried unanimously. • Supplementals Dave Aukes, 15061 Ridge Road, PID 21-116-22-43-0013,and Terry Fields,PID 10-116-22-21-0026, had submitted written requests to reserve their right to appeal the pending assessments on their properties as presented in the Supplemental Assessment Rolls. Aukes expressed concern about not being able to sell his property if the assessments were left at the rate suggested. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the public hearing and to approve the special assessment rolls for Supplemental Assessments. Motion carried unanimously. There were no further comments from the audience regarding any of the proposed special assessments. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution #93-207, certifying the final assessment rolls. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS • Councilmembers raised questions about the yearly expenses for the City-maintained cemetery. Jullie said he would report back to the Council regarding the cemetery maintenance budget. City Council Minutes 5 October 19, 1993 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Harris, Jessen, and Pidcock, voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII.PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX.REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Midwest Asphalt Pidcock asked about the status of the Midwest Asphalt odor complaints in response to questions from a resident. Anderson said he would respond to the complainant and relate the status of the situation at this time. 2. I-494 Corridor Commission SAnderson reported on the activities of the Commission regarding the a potential ordinance or regulation regarding the transportation alternatives for the area. He explained that there may be funding advantages to developing a planned approach to this transportation issue. Council directed that Staff set a date for the next workshop and include this item for discussion at that time. 3. Bicycle Racks at New City Center Anderson suggested that it may be appropriate to acquire a bicycle rack for new City Center site. He said many people would be able to walk and bike safely to the new facility and that he believed the City should provide a safe location for locking bikes. Councilmembers asked Staff to consider including a requirement for bicycle racks in front of retail stores and commercial areas in the future, as well. B. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Approval of Cooperative Agreement with City of Edina for Washington Avenue Street Maintenance and Provision for Sewer and Water Services MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement with the City of Edina for Washington Avenue street maintenance, sanitary sewer, and water service. Motion carried unanimously. • 2. Well House at City Center Dietz and Enger explained the details of the design work on the well house planned in the City Center area. They also explained the coordination taking place between consultants as directed by 2?f City Council Minutes 6 October 19, 1993 Council. A community bulletin board was also discussed for the facility. Council directed Stall provide alternative types of bulletin boards for their review at the next meeting. Council directed Staff to notify the other tenants of the City Center regarding the extent of the construction of this structure. XII. OTHER BUSINESS RIII.ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adjourn the meeting. Acting Mayor Anderson closed the meeting at 9:25 p.m. • 410 L?4O i - 'K r.1�� 1 J x k. ' -, C COS AGENDA ` -ihj ` 0 S +E N: Consent C#• c4ar afil2 'TA. 4 DEPARTI�i T: . TEm DE CFIOI Finance - Pat.Solie C'lerk's.License Application .Listflit_Li 4A :` , l ' o • . a These •1 icenses hove been approved by the department heads • a Bible for ,�# ,,„ the licensed activity • CONTRACTOR (MULTI FAMILY & COMM.) 6A >.FITTER f ' 4 ."I a k y.. =Y, 5. a'. kl Elite Compa ies, Inc. low MethCompanies, .Inc. `� McCarthy Construction, :Inc. t ' :Yema Inc. �i x�:. h HEATING•& TLATING } ti 1, r,, 4 a - •0 'i PLUMBING z r. Construction �harli;11 = i Erickson Plumbing, Heating & Cooling ,,A. p • ';,-.:0--.2 : - Mike l.s Plumbing •TYPE 8 FOOD { _ .r. }t Marshal Is o' *der Pra1ri * " SEPTIC SYSTEMS c Plymouth Pl u bi ng, Inc. = % t `b P' • • ,} 4,4:, t i a ... • 1x 8 • * 4t Action/Direction: ,11i -� 1 0'e : , x. i x Wes ` #" ' ; ',,t,-..4;.:17:,.,7Z44;];:;:t,4*,:it,,,,,'74,,,Ii:: 6Qy MEMORAND LT:1VI - Y'F 4 . 1v,7 # i TO: Mayor and City Council t�' A �:2Y fj �Y T1��'�.� Tl ROUG : Card J. Jullie,.City"Manager v,� " FROM: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician" 4. Y A � ! ` 'DATE, � a A' C�2b, 193 f ,, t y sad f '' nat SUBJECT: Final Plat�approval of Dellw r '' ' s z 4 �1` R 1 " Recommended Action: '� Y Staff recommends that the-City Council take the foiio acts. " Y -_ , $ &s il '" At apt the resolution approvingl U Ems, _` It'',.-,,I,' }.¢ the final of xr �' x �1,qN Also recommend 'that the approval of said ; lut�ttm be to requirements of the Developer's Agreement y' . items;110 • Addition sand utility e , ver wetlands a pr .n Z ' • Conservancy easement over the+ =DR 149 ` ` � • Street sign fee in the amount of 1,832 ; �� x x • Street lighting fee in the amount of$11231 1, Engineeringfee in;the amount of$3 440 -,,,,,,A, ' ,r • Execution of special assessment agreement far.tile. ` of , � p-*° r Road , q qq Over w: Located at the y �_.Orthaaast Quadraint of Pioneer Trail ark the proposed em o d '` i Road to the north, the plat contains 83.55'acres to be divided into re ' � 32 twinhome lots, three Doti©ts; and right-of-way dtfon"for streot Wises, r �`¢ rr . The City Council approved the preliminary gist may_ 1$,: 1993, sad;ag r � �� rezoningand the Developer's ' :'Agreement July i6, 19g3 Cnd ntly; die g ` property is substantially complete and utility bindle:n n is anderwaY. ti, ; -` ; ,` �w< JJ:ssa : E l - tlSzg N R .. � ^r A ; ��` �� 'i � c��1r:, � s's. r CTTY OF EDEN PRAIRIE SIN COUNTY, III N SO A "Y RESOLUTION NO. � A:k• A y •.�; , ;A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLTC : � DFT WOOD ESTATES r.' k WHEREAS, the plat t f Deliwood Estates has been submits in x nazrner 1e ; ,- land under the Eden I finance Code under C �.:: { and allp is--*` 'duly had there r,'ann+d r ,. - u[ �`b in .�] �^ fly pn q� a +f Y a5'YFi �1'���C jE�Z`EA. ,,sal .:plat. S all consistent:with"the City n and the, �'w J r g`-requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances°of t e sty of; NOW,-THEREFORE, $E TT RESOLVED BY THE EDE t` ACC t • r A. Plat approvalrequest forj)eli"Wo motes-ls �` recommendation =Qf.the City En 's" . on` $ . h B. That the :City Clerk is hereb tested to a tY Y Y .�1 s Resolutionthe owners and subdivision o f the me k `� � C. That the Mayor,a City Manager'are.,.'her y au orize ix�� Y„ .. . of on �of the Cuncil • ca ••m ' proYlSi�tlS. e f • ADOPTF,D by the Eden Frau a City.Council on November , 1 93. ATTEST:' ,SEAT. z John D. Frane, Clerkx m s P 7 ri — .ro,— ,, ,, r ,- -; , 7',""7. :717q17:7:4„,,,,,,,, ,., .. , . , , , 5r _ , . 4' .. � 9 yr �€''A: l -s S,k.: - ,fib t.�' i Ti !,J'' , '.4.. , MEMORANDUM ' /i t-,-4..*%, 1 ' . , . ,, -- ,.,,'Ore,k,:.:,. ......z.„,4,1,V',,!, TO• d r Al R 'S ,4,' Mayer and City Council F '0" , THROUGH: Carl 7ullie, City Manager ;w} $ � FROM: Alan D. Gray;City Engineer Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: October 26, 1993 SUBJECT: Final Plat Approval Hof Peter Andrea 2nc! Addition I - - - - Recommended Action:' :4f , gg a^ Staff recommends that the City Council take the following aeon: 4, ` * Adopt a resolutio#tr approving the' final plat of Peer Antes 'k fd it 5 following condition° : • Receipt of street sign fee in the ana ent,of 4�39 � • Receipt of.street lighting fee in'the aunt of$3,959 "k ., ' ; - ', �. .f f ' • Receipt of engia Bring fee in the 880 i an t,of`$8 0 �3 rf rfi Y; ,{�*, • Receipt of conservation easement " y ", • Revision of.plat to include standard cul-de-sac d �` k' Ea ss his Overview: ,� 'This ro ect lies west of Bryant Lake Thrive and east of ,, 7 .� f P .I 'mow Creek� � 1? �^ �'��� 14.89 acres to be divided into 22 lots and right-of-way dedi ,fps-auet, ,,' . a } owner intends to develop 16 twinhome units and 6 single family.;d t, r, - The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council'September 21, 19914 The ,: i 1_ Agreement and the rezoning were executed October 19, 1993. . 1�� <` ` }. 3 Issues to Consider: '1' � � $. r As outlined in the D eloper's Agreement, the. developer nould' pnM: the City .a conservation easement o the wooded slope and:.wetland areas:.: , a F -1 *' }� ,,,,!kill The plat should be revis d to reflect the Eden Prairie standard coil-de a gi. ? , , ,,t { iJ.ssa F m4 , 410 ., cc: Peter Andrea Co `es ., Y Westwood Prof 'onal Services X , s 2%it , k Ufa hfr �' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE .:HENIsIEPIN COUNTY, MIN OTA RESOLUTION Nq. y x+ r.., _ _ - y - jam$ ''Yf'f1 - ' A RESOLUTION APPROVING'FINAL'PLAN" - ,, -. •PETER ANDREA 2ND ADDITION •h k Sg�,u i yi .' MAe t; i. -' VH�EREAS, the plat of Peter Andrea 2nd Addition has been submitted in y �' . . platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under C rpter of Statutes and all.proceedings have'been duly•h thereunder,:and. ` «.,.. t ,FA fit`, EREAS said plat is in all respects consistent with.the City pla , ,ram ,> i Y i. requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinancea'of';�: u- of NO , ThERE.PE}ItE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRr. A} CIT C 3U y ,-A. Plat approval requestfor PeterAnca 2nd Actionis _ .:with therecomm atifln of the cityEn eels ratrt n , - : ; ..26, '1993. • B. That the City 'Clerk is hereby-directed to supp•ly ,a o�� a3 Resolution to the owners and subdivision of rse C. That t1 a It ror and City Manager are hereby out owed to ex . of approval:on behalf of the City Council �;: ;" ,# provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie..City Council on November ; 1993:, 4 � ` yam[ 3 °••Do as B Tenpas, Maw to 4-i u ATTEST:, SEA •L fig, 4 y i 2 ►.7s ' 1 - MEMORANDUM - ►' TO: Mayer and City Council THROUGH: Carl I. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works DATE: October 27, 1993 SUBJECT: Consultant Agreement AEC Engineering 2 Million Gallon Elevated Water Tower Project No. 52-248 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the attached agreement with AEC Engineering be approved and that the Director off Public Works be authorized to execute the agreement to inspect fabrication and coating of the metal portion of the elevated tank. 4111 Overview: The consulting firm of RCM, Inc. is the primary consultant for constructing this elevated tank. However, we have heard from several other municipalities that have constructed elevated tanks and they have strongly recommended that a specialist in inspection of welds and coatings(painting)is "well worth the money". Based on our recent experience with painting of the Baker tank and an inspection that we have had performed repainting of the.Hidden Ponds tank, it does appear that the best possible initial coating* on the tank will more than pay for the cost of this additional inspection phase. • Financial Considerations: The agreement with AEC estimates the cost to not exceed $37,500 without prior written authorization. The!cost of this inspection phase will be paid from the Trunk Utility E.h..ra1.3%, Fund. u*? • EAD:ssa • II \!/ 1qJ . AEC ENGINEERING ENGINEERS ilk OCT • 7 fa 1eg INSPECTORS 511 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis,Minnesota 55415 Rieke. :►ratlii ijir inmates Inc. Phone:(6121332-8905 Box I30 Hopkins. Minn. 55343 Fax:(612)334-3101 October 5, 1993 By Facsimile and U.S. Malt Mr. Harry Koutsoumbos Utilities Superintendent City of Eden Prairie 7905 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2227 Re: Proposal for Engineering and Inspection Services during Water Storage Tank Construction and Coating: 2.0 MMG Composite Elevated Water Tower • City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota AEC Proposal No. 55052493B, Revision #1 Dear Mr. Koutsoumbos: Thank you for the opportunity to 'resubmit this proposal for engineering and inspection services during the erection of a 2.0 MMG elevated water tower, with construction beginning in Summer 1993. • The purpose of the inspections will be to insure the work conforms to the specifications, AWWA requirements, and the construction drawings. AEC's inspection process can be divided into two (2) separate phases: Tank Construction and Shop Coating, and Field Coating. The services we provide during each phase are outlined in the enclosed List;of Elevateded jap1c Construction Items and are summarized below: Scope of Work Tank Construction and Shoo Coatincr Phase , 1. Foundation Installation Inspection during this procedure consists primarily of monitoring the placement of reinforcing steel, anchor bolts and any penetrations. .We can perform this work, but other forces may be better suited to perform this phase. AEC will not be providing these services on this project. 2. Shoo Fabrication and Coating of Steed It has been our experience, on similar projects, that shop fabrication inspection of steel has little or no benefit towards the overall quality of the structure. We would advise that the use of shop-primed steel be disallowed as much as possible, as we have found that its condition upon arrival to the job site is typically not conducive to quality workmanship. Field-applied primer is recommended. /* Mr. Harry Koutsoumbos • City of Eden Prairie, MN AEC Proposal #55052493B, R1 • Page 2 of 3 This phase of the work will require a minimum of two (2) site visits to the fabricator's facility each lasting two days. AEC provides inspection services on a time and materials basis in conformance with our Terms and Conditions and the enclosed Fee Schedule. 3. Tank Erection The inspection during this component consists of insuring tank conformance to the project specifications; that all AWWA code-specified examinations has been conducted and; that the tank surfaces are left in a smooth condition with no scab marks or gauges that would adversely affect the life of the coating systems. Normally, one site visit per week will suffice to adequately monitor tank construction. AEC will provide inspection services on a time and materials basis in conformance with our Terms and Conditions and the Fee Schedule. Assuming a twelve (12) week 1993 construction schedule, the total for this phase of the work will not exceed $7,000.00. Field Coating Phase The frequency of inspection is more critical during coating application than during construction. The inspection'procedures we follow are outlined in the enclosed list of inspection items. • The duration of the coating inspection depends on the time it takes the contractor to paint the structure. Under normal circumstances, an AEC inspector is on-site full-time. This will insure the contractor's equipment and application procedures are proper and efficient. Most importantly, full-time inspection insures all surface preparation, both interior and exterior, has been inspected and approved prior to coating. AEC's fee for inspection services are charged on a time and material basis in conformance with our Terms and Conditions and the Fee Schedule current while AEC is on-site. The total cost will not exceed $30,500.00 without written approval from the City of Eden Prairie. This estimate assumes a project duration of twelve (12), forty eight (48) hour weeks and a 1993/94 construction schedule. The estimate also includes the attendance of a qualified AEC employee at a preconstruction meeting . held in the Eden Prairie area. Please be advised that unless we monitor the painting phase on a full-time basis, AEC cannot give you any assurance that the coating was applied correctly. Factors such as surface cleanliness and weather conditions during coating affect its useful life. Unless we monitor these factors on a daily basis, we cannot maximize the benefit of our services. By assuring that the tank is built correctly and the coating system is applied in conformance with the specifications. AEC will help extend the life of the tank and coating systems. thus reducing the cost_pf tank ownership. We reserve the right to change our Fee Schedule, should the project be delayed or extend over a calendar year or stated deadline. We will notify you beforehand. I 23t? >' Mr. Harry Koutsoumbos .z City of Eden Prairie, MN AEC Proposal #55052493B, R1 Page 3 of 3 Services performed by AEC Engineering for this project will be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. AEC's engineering and inspection work will comply to the minimum requirements of the applicable national codes and standards and to the project specifications and drawings. It does not represent a guarantee of tank integrity and should not be thought of as a transfer of liability or responsibility. This proposal is valid for 90 days. Warranty inspections are not included in the scope of work assumed for this proposal. If you find our proposal acceptable, please sign and return this letter to AEC or forward a purchase order to my attention. We can schedule this project immediately after receiving written notice to proceed. • We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, AEC ENGIN ERIN , INC. Accepted this day of 1993. City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota • Tony Abena Marketing Manager By (Officer) Enclosures: Fee Schedule, dated February 25, 1993 Terms and Conditions List of Elevated Tank Construction Items pc: Shawn Mulhern, AEC M-File: Eden Prairie, MN • Z3CcC MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGI : Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Kevin WSchmieg, Director of Inspections, Safety, ;& Facilities DATE: October128, 1993 SUBJECT: DemoliRtion of house and garage located at 8018 � The City of Eden Prairie advertised to solicit bids for the demolition of a city owned house & garage located at 8018 Eden Road in the October 7th! edition of the Eden Prairie News. Two bids were received and openejd on October 15, 1993 . Miller Brothers Excavating $ 8,392 Bollig & Sons Inc $10,975 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to the ' low bidder Miller1Brothers Excavating for'the amount of $8,392. r r 5Ili - - H .., 23 ■� ,. dry --' - - .7'.7"•':,-1-'..4,,,,,....-.--.-,..:- :„)••.-' -';'-, .,,,,,...,q< .,..,• .‘-,.,-,..,,, .,,,.t.,,,'" 4 ' . , •,.. --‘• •;.•'1.1.0''.<.< 4,• ,.,. :.,,, ,,,,i1.= .,,,==, / ' ii4erg: • '?,,,"...i1:7; .4;.:=; ''. 1$ .:-4:74, .• , „-,_r crr ‘couNcii AGE NDA • ----,-, -- -_ , „,, - ,t ar- prrm COMMISSION ( *11253ec ,z.,i•., :,-i,.:.,."".p.'a. ,i,,. -2, - ..r..-„'•-'••. r. 1,.• -,_ , .... ,--,-',...,-;-4-.4,,';,-(7-4, --4- - ,,.. , . SECTION: Consent Calendar of PP fuere.. #•• . , - .' 4';', % , ,ri, , %II ,I, . ., DEPARTMENT: Latubert Director ':..,-4 _* , .,„„,,,10:',.,,,)y:::::-,',. ..,-'2,,,--,.. FROM: Bob ' , - - ,,--, ..w.s1sy.,;',.4--:„1-!'-:•-•.;_,.--, 4<,-, ITEM DESCRIPTION: : ,... ;...,,.... ._, - ai!,, ,,,,,,,-J?:-2--,:?:-,,,'!_-,•'. '',.',.:,',,--„,':;-,t.-,-. 7- •,,r .,..„- -------- Sell .... -.:--. , ..,-,,,,,,, : , Christmas Trees at -..,--',, -- --.*:, i'--,'---- ", --,.. ' -,„,,e,:e,-A.,-.,!, • & Optimist Club Request to --- ,..,- -,,,,---„,,,it - ,, .„,,..:,-..,,----_, ,„.-i.."- - ----_-:" - - =.4'‘IA- iliN' •-'\1.- V g,ok• r,... ''..• :, NaturParks, Recreation ,' Round Lake Park . A .3,. lo- -' A4.-,4:-***- al Resources ' - -..-- '- . , ,,,-,.;.i-,, r..- ,.;_'..:'---,y5fi-,,--.?-,4,....;-„.„--.,..;e•-•c.,_,. ; " PROPOSED ACTION: -,,,,--- ,,,,e-th:neihnriat..--.': 'Cilibifi:4'': i__,City Council approve the requeliv-v,t .... ••••1'--""" "".- , ,,...,,.••'''''' ',,- ' •4":1•„*,:",::-..tiqkilk• ' t '-' City staff' ' . i the 4-41Y -rx..- - Plink '' 'tha SC1100nerRaY! ........ is reemmendin ,........ 1,... (where the Lions %A.":plated , : . . , , -,i,. „,,„.,:- ,,,,e,.„,,,, community Center cast Parkins lut. '. --- . , .-K-';' • -,k, % sell Christnias trees. 5:,,,,. ---'-' - ' , --' •-',,-. - ,......,, ,....:;;., ,',...--- ,- ,..,Le e,,,,„,,-,if consider .1.J .im dutir;t1ePeSt---3Nr,- ,74ilyrw..,7,_:, requesting the City ...-‘..,....,... -lotions:- - 1,,..,",,,,,. -'' The optimist Club is also leg * Christmas tree sales at the following ,,, . ,-.'‘ -'-'-:-% ',-_-_;„ '•-,-- :-.;',.4,- .;i,;;;;,,----*_„„;,•w-,,.,-;,-.4,44.* advertising signs for diel ,..-.--, - - -,, 4' - '- '4,440:fe•I , ,,,-,r' ..•,--c,, ',,,' Prairie rl*Iter, . -: . -4;z-r :, ,,,,,,,'; -, „,,',„..-6p*,,,,l-h•,'::'':.,:, , '"7.'.? 1. At the ui• tersecu: of Highway.5 and `7' " ,:: DriveR Rod. -..-":- ty Road 4 and 'YAW view --7- '-'..-.---, ,-,-- 2. At the intersection ofof County Road 4 and }Cigliit'aY 1-,--' . .-..-4.•.fr; -..-"-,'-::::, -1,;:,'i ....,,-;-'442_:;:iA-14e-,.;i. .,4'''''' '''-'--'-._:-'2';._ 3. At the intersection ------i ... __, 1 and 4 :., , ,Road 4. At the intersection of County Road . on Valley View ,. ‘•,, ,s' -.., -:,-, 1 4.5 At the entrance to the site review' this request at their. The parks, Recreation . NatUrat. Resourcesm advise the dity, conned— on the Ps nallis$14*-,, .... 4,,, ;-_-::- ' 4-.,' .•,.''':-•,.'.,--:"-i' and City staff ,,,, _ „, ,,,,, ,, e, , A`.'-'•4-7,•Ir . •1'' -•:t ,-;`,.."*• :'., '- • ' November 1, 1993 m 2nd Council meeting. ,- - - _-. ' ..•r..' ' ' 4''.4 :.14''i'Ll.",ttt:',AV i."2. i 1 recommendation at the N ember -- ;*. - T:-. , '. ,,, ,--,, , --' •••••- ' -411c-e' '4'701**-Wili OVERVIEW: 1 ,,, _ -, .---,..- - zt--;•- , --,„---,-,z." .,...,,,----,.-„v,,,-.;-4.4-T -,•.5.',.;.;--F.;,-.!--,,,-- 1 4..ini,.............. immi,....%A.4 Raising ,;.4.,' '''..i..;,.' Wayne VIUNFIL4•24711,,117415P‘L f `"*4,4'`f , Attached to this memo is etter dated October 12th from Wa . 1 4,,04144 request is for four ,t,leekai beginnInf:„..14. ,s _attirdit„ , rittroin, *, , ,,,,-,,,--,,,, for the Optimist Club. . . - hours of operation would be limited to Fridays, from Noon to• - '. to 9 p.m. and sundays, 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. .....„,„,...,' ,tfiic, =alit 'der ProVidingsntfiv removal, - sales„, • • rt h is requesting that tl.ie CitY,C°.--10e.,..t.,,,,H4rsithat be used to,litiaC, ..,,,, The optimist --u . , th,. tim,6 period, au° proviue v. ,...7 ,,.., . --________„-- ,,,__.,.......v for.eieetswa necessarY during....-' "A"7 be wiling to contraotfor snow:. • I'w'mi. -P'''J The-Optimist Club would, area. . . usage, if required. to cleaning the lot after that use. . • • Club will comma up The Optimist a'''s° 't ' . i • -...-',.5''---.4-474,-...‘..- --‘,v - ,, • - .- ' ' - ,.-.-.--. -,_ --",,,,,i,,,r, ,i- ",--.wo,--,---;-„,--' ‘:- , MAURY ISSUE.S: I , ..,-____,,,_,, .... _ fitgroup-that spesisau PPRP,W, • ndwpro - ,-„.., ..,,,,i; ' ' " • e s . ;a-, Laub 13 a Public sirvice, Prairie - ,The christmakuipp mow* : . . ;':ki;.,:31;:::::7,;,,-,.,:-K.?;ti•,,,fiyf, The Eden Prairie • • • • *ti- on the youth of Eden,this . • lot ' •rnuaiso the Lions use 410 their fund raising act.ivi budget. The use or .parking. is similar, project. The Cigy"•doesStOt. -•'% , ' croiatesthe7pauic5%Litfgthk:nrt f;"tbueiral, Schooner Days fund raising Proj-- '' , generates • ,'--?' ="-- - • ;,:,.....4--v#,-.774 .-..,It.er, vp 2I-''') - , ' . ... _ --- • - ' �i 41? a'.r.4f k Club Wiest //////ffffffyyyyyy 1{�//yy/'� r{'ka�' . . October 5, Page 2 the Lions Club for use of electricity. The cost to the City to remove ro b - "i as we will be removing snow from-the adjacent g lit° er II l�. • City's policy to smart Eden Prairie non-� . :public • 2 re volume'' to spen their.dine for t of .ui ty, • • �4• ,' as �,similar to many other community rise ce prt j in v. :� - `' ' ,, PP" City staff do have a question on their t for Vie,as ism cow • er- City's at t directive toward allowing off site c s g on City pubic ght f`- u� 4 One issue that may be raised is,that this, fund- raging protect doh co� �{ z ` enterprise, one such enterprise is located in the vicinityat the ink o • a `` • . and C•ounty 4; therefore, them may be some Bon n by s - des f v • help the City fives this project.-" 4 BL•mdd .. - t.y, . . :§ k Att hment: Letter from Wayne G Op Club • Ate' � � t, 4 y1ry ,� �. l 1 i_ � 5�! �, k . trees mist -, t - '� ' - - - - - r.- am ' z; ,�s 4 yg t 4,s' - _ Rh '. ' r,y., .,� a • .fly '" p' • w �Xs x ` ,. _ • - ux .:E+ K fix,' b' eR rl .. yt Optimist Club OF EDEN PRAIRIE • 14180 West 78th Street,Suite 200 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 October 12, 1993 (612) 934-8405 City of Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department ATTN: Bob Lambert 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Bob: Our Club was recently informed by the leasing agent for Prairie Village Mall that we will no longer be able to use their parking lot for our annual Christmas tree sale. Thus, we are searching for a new location for this purpose. We have reviewed many locations in our search for an alternative site. The location that appears to be best suited for our use is the area directly west of the fire station at the intersection of Eden Prairie and Valley View Roads. This is the area where the Lions Club has its tent during its annual Schooner Days event. The Optimist Club is requesting approval from your Department to permit us to use this area for our annual Christmas tree sale. There are several factors that make this a good site for us. The area does not appear to be currently utilized for any other purpose. The site is paved, so none of the sodded areas would be adversely affected by our use. The available power supply is more than adequate for our electrical needs. The site is large enough to fulfill our customers' short term parking needs. Finally, since we expect to sell only about 700 trees over a four-week period, there should be a negligible impact on traffic patterns. We are asking that this request be brought up at the next meeting of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee on October 18, if that is necessary. The decision is extremely important to us, since this fundraiser generates over 75% of our annual budget. It would be our pleasure to meet with you prior to that meeting to discuss this matter with you further and to answer any other questions you and your staff might have. Thank you for your consideration in this matter, Bob. We look forward to meeting with you soon. Yours very truly, OPTIMIST CL OF EDEN PRAIRIE • Wa a Gilbertson Fundraising Chair 2 '?� el Optimist Club OF EDEN PRAIRIE 14180 West 78th Street,Suite 200 411 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 October 18, 1993 (612) 934-8405 City of Eden Prairie ATTN: Carl Jullie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Carl: As I believe you are aware, the Optimist Club has been informed that we will no longer be able to use the parking lot at Prairie Village Mall for our annual Christmas tree fundraising event. We are discussing with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department the possibility of utilizing the area directly west of the fire station near the intersection of Eden Prairie and Valley View Roads for this purpose. The issue of "signage" has been brought up in these discussions. Naturally, we are concerned about being able to notify the public of the change in our location, and would like to place signs at several locations. • However, we are also aware of the controversy this issue has generated this past year, and want to ensure that our Club conforms to the ordinance. It seems that in the past, there has been a tendency towards not enforcing the ordinance against nonprofit fundraising activities. Therefore, we are asking whether the City' s sign ordinance extends to nonprofit groups. If it does, then we would also like to know what steps are necessary in order to obtain a variance. Since time is of the essence to our Club, we would appreciate having City staff research this issue so that it may be discussed at the City Council meeting of November 2, 1993 . In the meantime, we would be happy to meet with staff prior to that date to more specifically discuss our request. Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to hearing from you soon. Yours very truly, OP IST CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE Steve Yerkes • Fundraising Co-Chair cc: Jean Johnson, Zoning Bob Lambert, Parks, Rec & Natural Resources '1vi ' ,_, i 1110 ,ift ,',.- I • i t: DAICE: • .-',',-,1:-",-:-.'ti q...,-;,,,if,". 0 „ --,7,-Vs ary couNaL, AGENDA ,,,,,,,,,i. , , , _ 2,, ,,„.,_:, , ,..,, ,.1,_,, '1''''',.' •,: ' - cd,..-.:n PRNR COMMISSION AGENDA - 54,1-0Tfeeeeir ei, r=rzuricz opt xr— t' , ;•, '••!,',7•-,---7-,,,,,' --,--,,, .• SECTION; Consent Calendar• ,,,'ur........1, : ,,..„_-:,‘„,,,,,,,,.-,,,,,i,---*,, FROM: Stuart A. Pox, Manager of Parks &Natural .' • , :--,i' ,,4, - r.4710A-,• i'-'ot't-i'.4.--.;,'..,: Resources , MM.Nitkr--,:Ii, .' ' DEPAR'TiVIENT: TIMM brisaitirrioN: , -, --1,,,,,- ,\- - ,. Parks, Recreation & . Tax Forfeited Property ' ' — ' • " •i. Natmal Resources , , „,,,,,, ,,,,,s 4-. , ' pio A ,.;., • "ih. .- r : A*'• i=4! - \ 1. . . Land Located in FAn„Prairie, sybtehH,..,,,*04,Attached is list 799-NC, A List of Non-conservation , ,_, , fr.,........,, been pronounced tax forfeit to the State of Minn '. '. for notic. -PatortleadatesineRF :thperty e,.4liaBoaiaoatir : As,". ..:- provided in State Statue 282, the County has requested the _____I-,Ity 4,... ' :axietiokapptve . ' ,..._ theland parcels. The City has the-oPtion to approve the viwana w. , . ., . '' - . . ' —-- sale to adjacent property owners, or request conveyance'to.the any for litiblie inev ' st includes five parcels of property wbkil are currently tax delinquent- The full description for these parcels is as follows:PARCEL . -MONO 1 01-116-22-21-0001 Unplatted laud in Section 1 , ,,$a 'ork,:li/w• ---, 2 09416-22-33-0045 WestgateAdditiot Lot,24,Block 7 . ,- , , .... $e 3 09416-22-31;oots et.......„r..,.,25 Block 7 , ; , - Westgate Addi'4""1"4.6„,* va i , . .,k‘ : .., ',t,. fr.z.„.„.-,•.--,-../.-.• ••,.41 kr raidomy , „ .,. ,,,, „ 09-116-22-33,0047 VicePte Addition 1.4tt„."'' =I')„a...477'ssee‘esiwtst- ''',,•' -:'-'pi:;,;.:=1-74i;litt, 5 09-11642-33-0048 Westgate Addition 1-°4 4', "17----Irr ,i;;:,:. RECOMMENDATION: • .i.• - -•-••-„,,,.=,,,..,,-• ; ,,,,,,,,X .t;,.,,▪ ,.;.,. , .., The staff has reviewed the five parcels on this list and taken a look at pida1. _..._____,,,,,_.,,iigriw...,,,,:„.w.,;_ .., the parcels for public purposes The • that the pato&-be wmma, ,,--• -?. The consensus of the staff is - , ,,,,14A,,,. , ,,, ,, .1:• ..4 r. , the following manner: •.- q• -,-, ,e,,ik,4',„2„04., - : ' ' - , . C-:;'1 -::':;':';32.":4•;147::::!;-1 t::::171:2;1?4:1 Offered for Sale to Adjacent Property Owner „— . Parcel #1 is a former single family residential lot on thP,.Vornet, _ ....,:u..ef 4.Blue Circle Driveiiogito111:izi,;;-ift„ ,,...71 bounded on the south by Highway 62 (Crosstown).. . The size of ""*.4 . ty top tiiikiiiiie•ki#:0:1::;*, tenth of an acre and the staff feels that combination with the'inider.!ri -, , -:-.,,;,--: 1.)."',,,,..2:::-,„,-..,- --iri*il of this tax forfeit Pared. '','" ' ' -_,' ' ' ' J:1:.."5,4i4113Tt.,' • is the best solution for disPosal Parcels to be Conveyed to the City: . , ' ' - ,-*;..''' ,•;;;;''''/:-.{t-''''V'''.!:1-44%',a. City itEden aliOidy owned by the : ...,' -„gs,,,:.--,,,,,,, ,,,::- •:,,• v,,L.,;,,,,;-..,-,,,,„ Parcels 2 through 5 are located adjacent to property combining 48.,...,nie„.0,4.-,..-,-;:,-::.;1,::::3,:i„,„,,,,,,..7;i4,,,,:, ,.. The area is known as Westgate Park(future)and the,staff feels that these parcels F---177,. ..-$::::‘,1:„.5A:::.: e„,...4.1*.ak.„ ,..-,1-,,.. : this already existing City property is .the best potential use for these forfeited .,...._.,...-..,„,- ,..-1,-.,,t*,!.. .,-,t4,,:,,. .-- lost during the construction ouvag`ATII‘: additional use of this land may be to mitigate w. edatt,ds . , ,, „..,,,,:t __.ort,„ however, the staff has not had the opportunity to fully evaluate_.....a,-the neefli.....A.fee. mitigation:,,- ,- - therefore, the recommendation is that this would be for Parldand Aumr. .°r,4 "'waii.. !purposes. - , ,,,.: .,,z;,::.,,,t.,4:70- • ' ' information has communicated to the Tax Forfeited ...and Division,Hennepin 4 f, 1 they are,comfixtable with this type of designation for conveyance of pr,operty. . .. ::,,..237111 • , , , ,, , , ,,=-1$7. ••'•,;K',.: rill ''' ' - ' ',.'', -•lif!,-,-;4i--- -• -4,;ttit: ry.* , . .,„,,,t ;4a,,„=„. .,..„.,,,..„,,,, ,- nos s�,' y,, :' bj Tax or cited y . ' October 2b, 1993� - -_ � - � `� ���-� � s� r A g City Staff f f'fftn ,that the City Council approve the resolution au#boi . � -these tax-f+ ted p as above. { SAF:mdd � , dmtsc Attachments: �� • r C y * k Resoles �' , Last of Non-conservation Land - ° ski t ,, 4yt f a F ik 1 �fi • 4 ..' y • • hs.�.,y{y & N: • 3 rs� s� r: . Yip • Y y r V CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEITED LAND WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has received from the County of Hennepin Non- Conservation List 799-NC, which lists 5 (five) properties in said municipality which have become property of the State of Minnesota for non payment of real estate taxes, (list attached),. and WHEREAS, provided in Minnesota Statute 282, the City Council is asked to determine the disposal of these parcels of land, and WHEREAS, the City can approve the parcels for public auction, or approve the parcels sale to adjacent landowners, or request conveyance to the City for public use without monetary consideration, or request that parcels be withheld form public auction for one year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City of Eden Prairie does request the Board of Hennepin County to approve the disposal of these parcels in the following way: 1. Parcel to be offered for sale to adjacent landowner: PIN 01-116-22-21-0001 with no pending special assessments. 2. Parcels to be conveyed to the City of Eden Prairie for park and/or ponding usage: PIN 09-116-22-33-0045 with pending special assessments of$812.69. PIN 09-116-22-33-0046 with pending special assessments of$812.69. PIN 09-116-22-33-0047 with no pending special assessments. PIN 09-116-22-33-0048 with no pending special assessments. ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 2nd day of November, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL • 237 NON-CONSERVATION CLASSIFICATION LIST 799-NC PAGE 11 PID PROPERTY ADDRESS PREVIOUS OWNER DATE OF . DATE OF BUILDING MARKET PROPERTY TYPE LEGAL DESCRIPTION JUDGEMENT FORFEITURE VALUE VALUE SPECIAL COMMENTS EDEN PRAIRIE (61) 01 116 22 21 0001 J F PENNISTON CO 4/16/90 6/17/93 35,000 1041962NDSTW W 8 RODS OF E 32 RODS OF N i2 LAND RESIDENTIAL RODS OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 EX RD AND HWY UNPLATTED 01 116 22 09 116 22 33 0045 HERBERT T MASON ET AL 4/16/90 8/12/93 19,800 7769 ONTARIO BLVD LOT 24 BLK 7 WESTGATE ADDN LAND COMMERCIAL 09 116 22 33 0046 HERBERT T MASON ET AL 4/16/90 8/12/93 14,700 7771 ONTARIO BLVD LOT 25 BLK 7 WESTGATE ADDN LAND COMMERCIAL 09 116 22 33 0047 HERBERT T MASON 4/16/90 8/12/93 5,700 7779 ONTARIO BLVD EX PARCEL 219D AS SHOWN ON MN/DOT N LAND COMMERCIAL RNV PLAT NO 27-46 LOT 26 BLK 7 WESTGATE ADDITION '09 116 22 33 0048 HERBERT T MASON 4/16/90 8/12/93 5,900 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED " EX PARCEL 219D AS SHOWN ON MN/DOT LAND COMMERCIAL R/W PLAT NO 27-46 LOT 27 BLK 7 WESTGATE ADDITION • • • • .''30.04 15D.18 • 30 30 N �" . , + w is 170.03 200.24 150.19 4.' 30 I $I (38) $ ': . T o YSi{7'SI• T� 13 g1 As 13 N v' Bid (18) a (23) , 1z - 5(30) $ = (3I) �ys•os .= $ (45) ounot 1 ;,.� :.�,•..., . I2..2 x1r:... (86) " 200 163.33 2 (50) 1... 'i ''t' ,{•• 150 g 170.03 14 ee. a 150 = (37) $ µ _ 46 0 '� (19) - oc 2 -� ( ) is(55) 9 Ir_3 (20) 150 Z..):„." 150 163. a 30 (A7) N ... - •� W (36) p1.09 0 i II 3 � I I 'O 7 h 3 n 153.23 `R IO o g �. 10 16 I (25) '(28) e -"' (33) = (48) - of - pD.57 (54) •- zoo 1) - 150 - 150 - _175.33 7 .Art •�Q� ~ - (35) - 1 i P Nei•►8 10 's 17 200 o 4 10 co 4 153.25 0 49)31 ha 15 4 `6" (22) - (26) (27) - $ (34) • 6 :..- 1 zoo.la ill . �� ' 4 o le o 150 150 2� 1zs.a6 (32) �'� R. (33)• 27 /.. > 16 6• ' t� 0 200 Q (26) (30) - _ 5 `01 �,� 77 ♦ \`5' ,,:E•25'64 13 I(21) 'r J' 15 tiP. ( i 6) �= 19 0 '�11.4 153 I - (31) 4 .,10"A\ e` J...'- ai t�.64 1 ` 0' 5.61. - r. • 156.65 r .� 8 2• 7.5 ►0 d0 $ 29 A'o '�. 14.27 20 � (27) �(29) �' - :`� (15) �� (35)e .� (22),� R•2p _� (6) ' - 1yA•i5 qb SSA �� 29 '' 8 ., 6 �� 4,, � ( 17) - 11.3, 7 $ `� :�. `' `‘e `� (14) \ 15 . -(23) 'g Y 16 a ,�a 200. .: (28) �e •' `e z7 \ u /5 (36) �4 01 ���5 ,.c ,3 45 • , 199.55 '� 17 o c (7) �QS % j 26 sue, a sl (43) ; - (18) -• c 'i? `� 1a ( 12) - 5 (16) 16 :5`� �`.O�,� /L, 'S 80.9e 80.90 0> 25 a 31"!% R. e P g (J7) 13 .. I.,_ tie'' ( ►I) • % (17) 0 z2s.99 (52) 22A. 24 `&. 32 EP 1`' 17 �_S 4 I)_ (8)223 (10) $,st .a. ( I8) ♦ ,-) 0 (38) Io3.Aa to (9) • 33 �' • ?a� T i2:(62) / (42) N Yi 4) t • �61' :•3 s 206.4 e ( 19) et s 9 • ISO 2` tS�4 0`J*V.' 21 es 18 7' • %�t ' es -a, (20) ` (d» (39) a 16t.11 i r e fir'.? 37 m (25) J S •• •• 66 •270• a*� /65,, (50)y'--�` O. 36 e-• cr (24) �p4 7? 023 ' '• 96.3 (44) VN06VELOPreD • (40) �4, • 4,0 (30) v/� 34. g N rar E R:�.17R ► ,• 24 or 3p \0�•. 0 • as (45� � ' ' Iis PAR 219L 101. 3 1`' S88 24 t ` (47 * l 16) - - t.S Z h ,. D _Doc NC 1$ �'<0 49- i!b-tZ- Z 'b $ I 5507140 z10 I• '4 33- ��� �� r,I G. PAR 219C ^' -- o TT ogo (2) z190 • 48) 41 o PAR 1 2.: � •is �s (vEr:TURE LA) ��' �°1 0} DOC NO 1969496 •• ul, 588.24•• 474.04 _ 217.5 ' A I r. is•- 742 -.. 598.59 - --S' = ,. I Nir li.gl o (-MDOT R/1 -PLAT NO 27 46 119..z- rlea•'ee , .�� . 3 sT , ,O ) 69.1 , N " SATE Hu)y S fr, , 1 190.13 i yy retrial ` �:r • L 2606.67._.RES A - s . — ,,7 il772S 11/ n rf.. c7Cu _,./(1--- n , n (It 1 LS _z 4 :a S 1 /4 CCR , SEC 36 o 7•,.•;,. ` j 117 I R 22 t .x '�."- • L'�27 it 1 ..y r, - ••�i •.> I " I 'T1 r ,15 T�* .....:. .•,...r,:4 . .."--..-7,------ - F a,z1,_ 1 . , ,„ ,4.<„ ,,,,,„ ,... -6 \ . S S• .^ :• •4 'N. ,.,:,) II\ 1-11to—Z2. lI — Q' 4 ,, �:S � I 41, -- .a N•1 s'N'si: \ .91;Ss;••:.-. .."-, -..........-- ----- �`�.. - _ f .V, . t? fY9 $ '•Iv �• ;. .43.�y IP \ M% \�s` 1 CPU et. 2r 11 2ND ,,„ C:t:LOL ACn 44 N. e •O N• . N $S �• 1 t� , cg -LLI ? eC 3 , _. s V `. 585 tibb-, -.$ _ ._ 4 u • A 4' ? ;? ram' {' VAC / � {� '�wt rt� } T▪ �,t CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1. r } k HENNEPIN .:' COUN"" , 14 NN1~SOT�i ,.; s rg4 RESOLUTION NO • r P '�UL 'YE H �' • € � ,VACATIOOVERN OFLPOTSART3`OAFNDTH4E, BDLRAI OCNICA�1G,E J�AND r- " :;AD O 4< WHEREAS,the Cityof Eden Prairie has certain d i nagesad Uti r a '; therein as follows: z ill .. R� g ' a� The North 255.0 feet of the East S.O'f+ of Lot 3 and the W 5 ° et ' ' , 4, all inBlock i,Jenkins Addition, HinC�r Ma. ' WHEREAS, apublic hear was held on Novi ' ky F enirat`'2, 1993 aor u • published and pond as requirby law; , • ` i ,'. -!',44,1--,';'1:,1.'"',,,,;;::,,Z4:-N`,,,4 WHEREAS, it has been domed that the sad draina .01 necessary and has nu interest;tEa'the public, theraafore=sta�d;.be v�ud; �, � �' �� ' NOW,SORE, BE IT RESOLVED by ttie Eden air City s �: ` 1. Said drainage and utility easements�s abbo►e i�t E s: ' .,, y ,.+ '• " bAiY�,E'Y e' 4 D .41 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a not ;o ';yeti"'w l obi t F accordance with M.S.A. 412.$51 N `" a ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on<Noy 2; i9 . z x ii • _ 75 4. :: - _ • f$! ',Ta • a• ATTEST: SEAL. 3 vt John D. Frane, CityClerk $, � r „ ` 40 ▪ ', , ., ry �'� • y h w,i, Thh y- r tins {' ,.tea« V k-#2-r.iP� .,,� .,. 8 y , • �` lrlw! 4 t , 1::ti '-'-- �S ; I . ��o It��� /� Q " ., ' � /f r� I CI- - s� ' , \air �!a ► V"'" • s ?i. r �11l11 « / 1 _ AP AR _ r '' {_k `.7 .✓ ' �,i W W i.r.�/ ; .+9 4 ,_� it' if !1 is C iin am _ i,..__ .....1...,,44.;_aps.....2._,,,70.....1.77 , AOP ., .';'.1.111, i .;-**4 471".14 , , litil:riariritill itaritrN7INtittsi ' x iIIwg .•1‘7.,',',,,,.,:...'"'',,,',f;....1-..!-,;,-;-.',4,,:"..';,;,i''-:',',,•:..::':.:,,,",., .,71" "7 . iii ce".v +7r� �-I� l ,,' r ems` rl�rA�, "*o. , v�_.. ;, , .. .. -:� ,- ...:4:2 weiMs 4,tvikliPah, ....,./ . -, • - . •.. •;....,-.4 .....,:ef-,_!.,-,..-.,'.,.:,.., •••� 'C. Err. ilnit ikti li ,7a y:. €..'¢': ., �i ;„,441 8TO "*Sit11), ♦`tom.. -x�'tSC),C�I►'!'R `. .Ate: ,, 'Arlie ,, 1�! eisi, � �ier� �� f -'" c:ft ' limblii - , ''" 144" - ,- ''' -;',-----'. ,.... ".';'--;.'-';'-l-i-,',.:•'.. ,17-',.:- --'_--i.--:',-:-',':-A---1-4,-;-'1::."4":';,,f--'?-:::t-''.-'At 'M PA; - A . - - - . . --I:_i-...-1 --;'..-''''''.'2-: -,:-,..-;,::.,"'!:--...-:;;;-,-,,,,,11;11::_:::;:.,-,7-.,:-:'-';',,,,';1-1 '.. /? 9,4 X � s a 1 r S s A s��^ rz,7 •'x • i.ii iR � 7C 1 'fir„ v s � . t xi i!M!t ::. I. _ €. S NK ! S A DDI IoKI 0 0 • ----- . ,.. ........ ..,.... N i -- 473.55 `�s°35'S0„W 83.28 h 209.5 I S 76°38 10 W \15.O0 • 4� �r 119.58� _ N�v_ a Drainage G/ ` �• \ ' w I/' and Utility Easement l ;" l�ppo 5�0Eosemj /I 25.69 d Utlllty ` 1 an �— 5-'I I� \\\ I I v Drainage ���� i �-5 �� \\�''1 r 5 1 IA I Imo-I0 t•-s I BLOCK I/1 1 I 25 I0 / n I IM 2 v I L _ ,I I N o I I N v I O /` I ID L-/�1 51=iv) �1 �O �1 W _ _ _ z _ — — zJ ,f) 0 en I 3 VA . Tar� 1 / ' . - �J O --Drainage and Utility Easement; v \ ,`� �v I °N O N 5 I 413p 7'q9„ to A-. ` \ I z .08 / �I 4=3 ci 29'2p„ /nage on el Ul` 412 / O/3a20,O0a 40 l///y Eose m�'r r. � R25 49" , r8Oa enI ...II 't') '--ti.t: 1': 3,0p l3e ��� 4„7'AORr - - -~ i `` / H 73 3 7' ``I / 2ge 8900"�' o 2 / N ?3Q32 /Po4 SITE FLAN / \ M`_ -M VAC 93 -O6 Y gz NOV$MBER 241983 {F AH tG . . ., .: -ram 4 '" 4 l,c 3 UNITED WAY ' FUND DRIVE DONATIONS-HUMS-S�CES Dom' .r.'- r : a z 15996 CITY OF ST PAUL SCHOOL-POLICE DEPTa. ` ., 3� �- 15997 NCS ASSESSMENTS CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRAT DEPT ` -, • CENTEX HOMES-MN DIVISION REFUND-PARK DEDICATIONF S °' -4 r ;' ' . 1 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM SEPTEMBER. 93 SAC CHARGES 4. . ' -04 { - .e' # MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER SEPTA 93 BUILDING;O iAR - n� / A 1 16001 VOID OUT CHECK A§ r �, ' =12 NORTHERN STATES AVER CO SERVICE 18003 NORTHERN WATER-WORKS SUPPLY SEAL FOAM C RTRIDGE- ~ . `DEPT - � "w{ j 16004 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE *i1 18005 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 4 16006 LAVERNE ANDERSON REFUND» COLOR'TOUR �, 3_ - . 16007 LOIS ANDERSON REFUND- TEE ING LESSONS ,' . 16008 KATHRYN BABCOCK REFUND-SWI ING LBS x Y :. 16009 GERARD BRYNDAL REFUND-SFIItING LESSONS 16010 MARY ANN CAMPBELL REFUND-SENIOR 01tIONS R 16011 VOID OUT CHECK .�; �" • 18012 CYNTHIA• LYDEN RE L SONS � 16013 CURT FERNANDEZ REFUND-; NG S . ' <. 16014 MOLLY FERNANDEZ REFUND- .LEA t,:�. 's+ c t : 16015 NANCY GAGNER REFUND-SWI INC TaESEONS ' tt �, 7-,'. 16016 NICK KHALIL • REFUND-SWIME4ING LESSONS t,. •,' v. •. 18017 LEONARD SKAALEN REFUND- IO : ION'S 4 . . 16018 RACHEL SKAALEN . REFUNDRS$NI-OPTIONS EXPO • 16019 AUTUMN TANI-WINGARTEN REFUND-SWIMMING °LESSt S .r 1 020 CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING MICROFIUIING-FINt E DEPT/UTIL TIES q ��•, s 'i 16021 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-ENGINEERING 11,4' - IOR, v.4` t ..off` ' : ` BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/ 0 ' ` REC 4- SO ID Wes"M( T ►' R DEPTJE� r k22 REHABILITATION PM AT&T SERVICE 2 L •16023 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE x a 16024 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE .: , -$ 16025 RED WINGIWINONA TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 16026 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HAZARDEOUS WASTE LICE MMERI4bAl 152. 16027 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING"IN 1 ``"'4: -. . . " ``; 16028 ERNEST LARSON REMOVAL 01 CITY '=. DI � 18029 JUDY ORROCK REFUND-ROMP N ROLL/CIRCUS' . IP 'i,„:, '2GAX, 16030 JULIE THOMPSON REFUND-SING LESSONS, -, 6.0t 18031 STANDARD SPRING CO U-BOLTS-EQUIPMENT.MAINTENANCE .74 16032 JEANE THORNE INC SERVICE- LICE DEPTfCCE'lE UNITY. DZVELOEM 1 DEPT 16033 VENTURE PUBLISHING INC BOOK-ADAPTIVE RECREATION D - _ s 16034 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS CAUTION.SIGNS-SAF'ETY•DEPT; . 16035 TARGET CENTER CIRCUS TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS. & , `. °� r f PROGRAM/FEES PAID ;EVE X 16036 MASWCD • CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING 'T ,i, w } 16037 OPERATORS .EMIRS TRAINING & CONFERENCE-PARK MAINTENANCE.. ., c ; 16038 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN CONFERENCE-PARK"& RECREATION E 16039 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO OCTOBER 93 DISABILITY I�SUR PREMIX '_ i'S 16040 PRUDENTIAL INS CO OF AMERICA OCTOBER 93 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM ' ` ; .-- , t ' 16641 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 10-15-93 SAVINGS-BONDS,x 18042 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 16-15-93 . y .� '. kl • 6043 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 10--15-83 • . ' ' " 4 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-15--93 CHILD SUPPORTDEDUCTION _ ., : a � 23665081 -4..,,,,,,-.4., aa ,,t� - -. • f:y 4.:. �y ?. NOVEMBER 2.1993 16045 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-15-93 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION / 225.6E 16046 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 10-15-93 t 3576.4E 111E47 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 10-15-93 32.0C 48 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-15-93 . 298.00 16049 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 10-15-93 50.0C 16050 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-15-93 25.0C 16051 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA NOVEMBER 93 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 237.00 16052 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 10-15-93 37529.97 16053 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 10-15-93 100.00 16054 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 10-15-93 206.0C 16055 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR POSTAGE METER-CITY HALL 8000.00 16056 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP MIX 116.4C 16057 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 5514.2C 16058 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 7709.1C 16059 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER & MIX 7292.52 16060 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 425.9C 16061 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 212.3E 16062 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER & MIX 11207.7E 16063 JACKIE ENGMARK REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 21.00 16064 JOYCE HETTRICH r REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 4.00 16065 DEBRA LUECK REFUND-KARATE LESSONS 58.0( 16066 KELLY MCCONNELL REFUND-DIVING LESSONS 36.0( 16067 JOAN NELSON REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS LESSONS 18.O( 16068 CARRIE OLSON REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS 21.0( - 16069 MICHAEL STOICK REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEE 52.5( 16070 AT&T SERVICE 549.8( 16071 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 13657.6( 4111g72 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 775.3. 73 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-NOVEMBER & DECEMBER COMMUNITY 2363.5E NEWSLETTER • 16074 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 536.2' 16075 RICHARD ERICKSON REMAINDER OF FEE-ENTERTAINMENT-HALLOWEEN 200.0( PARTY-SPECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM 16076 BRADLEY GUDIM ENTERTAINMENT FOR YOUTH APPRECIATION 175.0( DINNER-SOCIAL EVENTS PROGRAM 16077 JOHN KUJDA BAND FOR HALLOWEEN DANCE-SENIOR PROGRAMS 125.0( 16078 EAGLE WINE CO LIQUOR & WINE 5403.7: 16079 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 22269.6: 16080 VOID OUT CHECK O.00 16081 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 322.2( 16082 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR & WINE 39587.1: 16083 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 6664.1: 16084 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR & WINE 25334.2 16085 WINE MERCHANTS WINE 245.0, 16086 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR & WINE 69267.8: 16087 ABBOTT PAINT & CARPET CO PAINT ADDITIVE-WATER DEPT 105.6' 16088 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS- 2216.2, POLICE BLDG/FIRE STATIONS/PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 16089 AEC ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS TANK INSPECTION & EVALUATION OF GROUND 1600.0' STORAGE RESERVOIR-WATER DEPT 16090 AIM ELECTRONICS INC OVERLAYS-COMMUNITY CENTER 31.9. 16091 AIRSIGNAL INC OCTOBER 93 PAGER SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER 10.5 Ili, 6092 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC MANUALS/METER SOFTWARE/TRAINING VIDEOS- 1279.0 WATER DEPT 093 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC STREET SIGN PLATES/BRACKETS/POSTS/DECALS/ 3577.7 DELINEATOR SIGNS/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS/ 27926654 Z3334- STAINLESS STEEL BANDING-STREET DEPT/ BARRICADE PANELS-VICTORY LUTHER CHURCH STREET IMPROVEMENTS 16094 ANDERSONS GARDEN EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT ` 26.3: 4111095 ANIMAL & BOARDING KENNEL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 59.4: 096 TIM ARLT SERVICE-TUCKPOINTING-POOL MAINTENANCE- 300.O( COMMUNITY CENTER 16097 B & S TOOLS BELT SANDER/BELTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 218.2' 16098 DALE BACHMAN REFUND-OVERPAYMENT OF CASH PARK FEE 1106.72 16099 BACONS ELECTRIC CO MOTOR STARTER/CONTACT OVERLOADS-WATER DEPT 900.0( 16100 BAKER POOLS ROPE ANCHORS-POOL MAINTENANCE-COMMUNITY 248.2( CENTER 16101 BAN-KOE SYSTEMS INC TIME CARDS/RIBBON-COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 106.0( 16102 S H BARTLETT CO INC VALVE STEM ASSEMBLY-COMMUNITY CTR MAINT 55.4( 16103 RICK BEDNAR REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 19.0( A & CLASS B DRIVERS LICENSE 16104 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC POSTS/FACING-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER 326.5: 16105 BIFFS INC OCTOBER 93 WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 976.0: 16106 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 285.2( 16107 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON SEPTEMBER 93 KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL 262.0( DEPT 16108 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO SOLENOID-POLICE STATION 50.9: 16109 BMB SERVICES SWITCH REPAIR-POOL MAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER 60.0( 16110 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION SERVICE-ROWLAND RD/GEORGE MORAN DR/ 1687.6( RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS POND/DIKE & SEWER/ VILLAGE KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION ROADWAY 16111 DAVE BRAZIL CONFERENCE EXPENSES-WATER DEPT 26.8' 16112 PAUL BROWN FOOTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 646.0( 16113 BRW INC SERVICE-DELL RAOD CONSTRUCTION 10747.8( 114 NATHAN D BUCK SOFTBALL/VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 453.7 115 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 330.0( 6116 WES BYRON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 49.5( 16117 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS REPLACED TONE REEDS/CLIP STOPPER/ADJUSTED 723.2: SPEAKER/WATER TOWER ANTENNAS GROUNDING RODS INSTALLED-POLICE DEPT 16118 CARLSON EQUIPMENT CO AIR COMPRESSOR RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 632.551 16119 JIM CARLSON LEASING CO VAN RENTAL-OKTOBERFEST-SPECIAL EVENTS 117.8, PROGRAM/ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAM 16120 LARRY CARTER REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 32.0( A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 16121 CASH REGISTER SERVICE & SALES RECONDITIONED CASH REGISTER-COMMUNITY CTR 266.25 16122 KEVIN CASSADY REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 32.0( A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 16123 CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORP REFUND-OVERPAYMENT FOR STREET SIGNS 220.0( 16124 CENTRAIRE INC FURNACE & INSTALLATION-OUTDOOR CENTER 2270.01 16125 JAMES CLARK OCTOBR 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 200.0( 16126 CLASSIC POOLS PLUS INC CHEMICALS/CHEMICAL TESTING STICKS- 578.9: COMMUNITY CENTER 16127 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS SERVICE-REMODELING OF E P CITY CENTER 42046.3 16128 CO2 SERVICES CARBON DIOXIDE/CYLINDER RENTAL-POOL MAINT 165.8( COMMUNITY CENTER 16129 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS BACK SUPPORTS/ADHESIVE/MASKING & FILAMENT 372.0' TAPE/WIPERS-WATER DEPT 16130 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC CURB & GUTTERS/FIBRE EXPANSION/KNEE PADS- 176.9 WATER DEPT 41,677558 2.3 5a 16131 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC FLAT BANDS FOR CONCRETE PIPE REPAIR-WATER 61.9E DEPT 16132 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT/ 263.6E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 133 CORPORATE LEARNING CENTER SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 500.00 134 CREEK KNOLLS LTD PARTNERSHIP REFUND OF DEVELOPERS DEPOSIT AGREEMENT 348.1E FOR BLUFFS E 14TH 16135 CROWN PLASTICS INC PLASTIC SHEETS-PARK MAINTENANCE 162.8C 16136 CULLIGAN - METRO OCTOBER & NOVEMBER SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 34.7C 16137 CUSTOM HEADSETS INC TELECOMMUNICATORS HEADSETS-POLICE DEPT 110.9E 16138 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 120.7( 16139 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 8561.7: 16140 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER/WATER 114.3: 16141 DATASOURCE CONNECTING POINT COMPUTER NETWORK REPAIR DUE TO LIGHTNING 166.1' STRIKE-FIRE DEPT 16142 CRAIG W DAWSON EXPENSES/MILEAGE-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 16143 DEM CON LANDFILL INC SEPTEMBER WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINT/ 158.0C SEWER DEPT 16144 DAN DESAULNIERS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 66.0( 16145 DE SIGN ER STREET NAME SIGN-STREET DEPT 24.5( 16146 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS INC ANNUAL INSPECTION OF 2 LADDER TRUCKS- 1786.7( FIRE DEPT 16147 BRIAN DOTEN REFUND-S01-rEALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0c 16148 DPC INDUSTRIES INC SODIUM POLYPHOSPHATE-WATER DEPT 1552.5( 16149 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC ARTWORK-COMMUNITY BROCHURE 161.3: 16150 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY AUGUST 93 COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 929.9( CITY HALL 16151 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC 137.2f DEVELOPMENT 40152 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD PUMP ASSEMBLY/SWITCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 271.2, 153 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 3RD QTR 93-$2500-HUMAN RIGHTS & SVCS COMM/ 2612.0( ROOM RENTAL-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM 16154 EDEN PRAIRIE TIRE & AUTO SVC WHEEL ALIGNMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 34.9'. 16155 CITY OF EDINA WASHINGTON AVE TRANSFER AGREEMENT- 524117.4' UTILITIES DIVISION 16156 CITY OF EDINA SEPTEMBER 93 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 325.0( 16157 EKLUNDS TREE & BRUSH DISPOSAL SEPTEMBER BRUSH DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1185.0( 16158 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES MOTORS-WATER DEPT 320.8: 16159 EUGEN ELLEFSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 2042.2' 16160 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC EAR PLUGS-PARK MAINT/PVC BOOTS/GAS 346.9, CALIBRATION CYLINDERS-SEWER DEPT 16161 CHRIS ENGER EXPENSES/OCTOBER 93 CAR ALLOWANCE- 217.0' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 16162 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 134.1' 16163 TIM ERNHART REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERNCE BETWEEN CLASS 32.0' A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 16164 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-CITY HALL 5.5. 16165 FACILITY SYSTEMS INC DESIGN SERVICE-E P CITY CENTER 470.0 16166 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 975.8 16167 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC FILTERS-POOL MAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER 86.1 16168 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES REPLACED BACKSTOP-STERLING FIELD 875.0 16169 FIRST CHOICE VENDING COFFEE FILTERS/COFFEE CUPS-CITY HALL 89.3 16170 FLEET MECHANICAL SERVICES STEEL & WELDING SUPPLIES/BUILT NEW 141.3 RECEIVER FOR HITCH-SEWER DEPT 4104970328 23E3". NOVEMBER 2,1993 16171 JOHN FRANE OCTOBER 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-FINANCE DEPT .., 200.0( 16172 FRESHWATER AQUATICS SERVICE-BOG REMOVAL-RED ROCK LAKE 1400.0( 0173 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC REPLACED PUMPER DRUM NIPPLE & ELBOW/WON- 2414.5( ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER 16174 JOHN GERTZ RESPIRATOR CART/DOOR HINGES/PORCELIAN 51.2: KNOBS-CUMMINS GRILL HOUSE-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM 16175 GME CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE-VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH-BERGER DR 2011.6' & LAKESHORE DR IMPROVEMENTS 16176 CHARLES A GOBLE EMERGENCY TECHNICIAN BAGS-FIRE DEPT 53.2r 16177 GRAFIX SHOPPE GRAPHIC KIT/REMOVAL OF EXISTING MARKINGS- 370.2E EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16178 THE DALE GREEN CO SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE 127.8( 16179 GSTN JOINT CABLE PROGRAMS-PUBLIC INFORMATION 1560.0( DEPT 16180 GTE DIRECTORIES SVC CORP OCTOBER 93 ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 217.0( 16181 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 112.6( 16182 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-BRAXTON DR/CREEK KNOLLS/MEADE LN/ 18149.5, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS/VILLAGE KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION 16183 MILO HARTMAN SERVICE-GUTTER INSTALLATION-HOUSING 426.0( REHABILITATION PROGRAM 16184 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINSTRATION 76.a 16185 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT 78.0f 16186 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MFG FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 394.O' 16187 HOFFERS INC FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 143.5: 16188 HONEYWELL INC OCTOBER 93 INDUSTRIAL MAINT AGREEMENT- 1200.01 WATER DEPT 4111189 HONSA LIGHTING SALES & SERVICE IN LIGHT BULBS-LIQUOR STORE 27.8, 190 JODIE HOPPE FACE PAINTING SUPPLIES-SUNBONNET DAY- 24.2, HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 16191 HUTTON CHEMICAL FLOOR CLEANING DETERGENT-EQUIPMENT MAINT 62.6: 16192 INTERSTATE BEARING SILICONE/LUBRICANT/BELTS/SEALS-WATER DEPT 127.2 16193 BRIAN JOHNSON STORAGE RACKS-SEWER DEPT 380.01 16194 CARL JULLIE DUES/EXPENSES-ADMINSTRATION DEPT 163.3i 16195 KAHNKE BROS INC BLACK DIRT-SEWER DEPT 21.3k 16196 KREATIVE ACRYLICS BROCHURE HOLDERS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 180.0( 16197 STEVE KUDEBEH HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 485.0, 16198 JILL KUYAVA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 128.0, 16199 L 0 F T CLASSICS T-SHIRTS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 98.4 16200 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY BAGS/MEDICATED SOAP/SKIN CREAM-WATER DEPT 372.0' 16201 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1233.9 16202 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC COMPLETE REBUILD OF VEHICLE-PARK MAINT/ 2321.0_ PEDAL ASSEMBLY/HORN BUTTON/BRACKET/ 0-RINGS/BRAKE PART-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16203 ROBERT LAMBERT DUES/OCTOBER 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-PARK & 343.3 RECREATION DEPT 16204 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER TOP SOIL-SEWER DEPT 95.8 16205 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD SEPTEMBER PROSECUTION SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 9915.0 16206 ALLEN R LARSON CABLES & CONNECTORS FOR SURVEILLANCE 21.4 VIDEO CAMERA-POLICE DEPT 16207 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS/TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 141.9 16208 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC SEPTEMBER 93 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 1270.E Alli209 BILL LEMPESIS MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE 154.0 ligrao LARRY LIND - REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 19.0 A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 4657199 1 16211 DAVID LINDAHL CONFERENCE TRAVEL EXPENSES-COMMUNITY 66.61 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 6212 TRACY LUKE SCHOOL TRAVEL EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT v4111- 15.5( 913 JOHN LUTTER OPEN HOUSE INVITATIONS-FIRE DEPT 100.0( 214 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 2 SNOW PLOWS/HITCHES & EDGE WINGS-STIdET 21753.9( MAINTENANCE 16215 RODERICK MACRAE BWCA CANOE TRIP LODGING EXPENSES/CAMPING 358.2: EQUIPMENT-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS 16216 MARKS EDEN PRAIRIE AMOCO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 17.4t 16217 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC PICNIC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 74.8E 16218 MENARDS NAILS/BLADES/ROLLER COVERS/WASHERS/STUDS- 163.4: PARK MAINTENANCE 16219 METRO GARAGE DOOR CO REPLACED 22 SLATS IN ZAMBONI ROOM GARAGE 903.7( DOOR-COMMUNITY CENTER 16220 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL FROZEN LINE REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 329.5E 16221 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM NOVEMBER 93 SEWER SERVICE 149813.0( 16222 MIDAS BRAKE & MUFFLER EXHAUST PIPE/CLAMPS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41.6( 16223 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 806.3E 16224 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 290.0( 16225 MINNCOMM PAGING OCTOBER 93 PAGER SERVICE-UTILITIES DIV 44.4( 16226 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 698.0( 16227 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS INVOICE FORMS-CITY HALL 423.4E 16228 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY FIRE EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING/GAUGESi 1029.0E BUCKLE ASSEMBLIES/WAIST BELT KITS/NOSECUP ASSEMBLIES-FIRE DEPT 16229 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN SOFTBALL STATE BERTH ENTRY-ORGANIZED 100.0( ATHLETICS PROGRAM 16230 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY FORKLIFT RENTAL-STREET MAINTENANCE 905.2! Agii231 MINNESOTA WANNER CO GUAD VALVE CHAMBER KITS-PARK MAINTENANCE 51.5( 232 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CASTOR/CONTROLLER/BLADES/SWITCH/SENDING 613.Ot UNIT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16233 NEMER FIEGER & ASSOCIATES INC ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 1810.0, 16234 RICH NESS REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 32.0, A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 16235 WILLIAM T NEWELL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 82.5, 16236 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS FACSIMILE PAPER/INK FILM-CITY HALL 215.8` 16237 NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO IGNITORS-STREET LIGHTING-STREET DEPT 75.3: 16238 NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICE INC INVESTMENT FEES-FINANCE DEPT 48.5, 16239 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CEMENT-SEWER DEPT 79.&: 16240 OFFICE ELECTRONICS INC COMPUTER PAPER-CITY HALL 78.9 16241 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERY-FIRE DEPT 68.1 16242 BILL OLSON CO BLACK DIRT-STREET MAINTENANCE 95.8, 16243 BILL OLSON SCHOOL EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 18.1 16244 OPUS CORPORATION REFUND-DEVELOPERS DEPOSIT AGREEMENT 125.9 16245 OTTO LANDSCAPING INC REPLACED DAMAGED CYCLONE SLIDE SHUTE- 350.0 CARMEL PARK 16246 P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC SPRINKLER HEAD COVER REMOVAL TOOL/PVC 73.1 PIPES/COUPLINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE 16247 PET FOOD WAREHOUSE MUZZLES-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 93.0 16248 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADr'INISTRATIUN 18.0 16249 PETERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICE-INTERSTATE PROPERTIES LITIGATION- 1738.7 ROWLAND ROAD 16250 PRAIRIE CYCLE & SKI T-SHIRTS-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS 55.0 6251 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN SAW RECOIL REPAIRED/WEED TRIMMER LINE/ 172.5 BLADES/SAW BLADES SHARPENED-FACILITIES 18383092 t DEPT/STREET MAINT/PART: MAINT/WATER DEPT 16252 PRINTERS SERVICE INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 94.E 16253 JERRY PRODOEHL MEETING EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE 30.0 4111254 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC FUEL PUMP POWER RESET SWITCHES-EQUIPMENT 142.4 MAINTENANCE 16255 QUANTUM & COMPANY CUSTOM EMBROIDE UNIFORMS EMBROIDERY SERVICE-PUBLIC WORKS 7.5 16256 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ZAMBONI EXHAUST ANALYZED/CARBURETOR 137.5 ADJUSTED-COMMUNITY CENTER 16257 RADIO SHACK DC TO AC INVERTER-POLICE DEPT/HEADSET 131.4 COMMUNICATION RADIO REPAIRED-WATER DEPT 16258 REACH EQUIPMENT PAINT-WATER DEPT 43.1 16259 JAMES RICHARDSON FRAMED 3 MARTIN LUTHER KING POSTERS- • 120.0 CITY HALL 16260 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC SERVICE-ROWLAND RD/LEONA RD/WATER TOWER/ 46372.0 TECHNOLOGY DR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS/TRUNK WATER MAIN 16261 RITZ CAMERA FILM-ENGINEERING DEPT/COMMUNITY 117.0 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 16262 KARY SMITH SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 69.E 16263 THE S T ROBB CO CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 301.2 16264 RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY REFUND-MN PLASTICS DEVELOPERS DEPOSIT 480.0 AGREEMENT 16265 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION CARBURETOR CLEANER/TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 307.7 PARK MAINTENANCE 16266 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC PRIZES-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 22.E 16267 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES/GLOVES-COMMUNITY CENTER 411.4 16268 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC PAPOOSE VACUUM CLEANER/HOSE-WATER DEPT 415.E 16269 SCHWANS SALES ICE CREAM FOR SUNBONNET DAY-HISTORICAL & 47.E CULTURAL COMMISSION 270 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 33.4 6271 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC SERVICE-IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC 4037.E INFORMATION PROGRAM FOR SURFACE WATER UTILITY 16272 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 3RD QTR 93 SENIOR OUTREACH SERVICES- 1750.0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 16273 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC SWEATSHIRTS/CAPS/JACKETS/EMBROIDERY 431.E PERSONALIZATION-POLICE DEPT 16274 ERIC SIT KARATE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 705.E 16275 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC LUMBER-STREET MAINTENANCE 81.7 16276 PETER N SMITH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 313.E 16277 W GORDON SMITH CO OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 22.E 16278 SNAP ON TOOLS HOLE SAW-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 10.2 16279 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION BEARING PULLER SET/MAGNETIC PICKUP TOOL/ 335.0 PRY BAR/SCREWDRIVER SET/AWL/CUT OFF WHEEL- UTILITIES DIVISION 16280 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC TYLENOL/SHOE POLISH/FOAM CUPS/CAMERA/FILM- 76.2 POLICE DEPT 16281 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC FILM/FILM PROCESSING/OUTLET STRIP- 30.1 RECREATION ADMIN/HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM 16282 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS LEGAL NOTICES-TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 86.E 16283 SOUTHDALE YMCA 3RD QTR 93 SERVICE-YOUTH OUTREACH PROGRAM- 2770.( COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 16284 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY GRINDING WHEELS-SEWER DEPT 19.( 41ii6285 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-FACILITIES DEPT 222.r 6017821 - z i NOVEMBER 2,1993 16286 SOVR9N INC REPLACED FLOPPY DRIVE/CONTROLLER-POLICE 124.6, DEPT v S287 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 316.4E ‘11,288 STATE OF MINNESOTA LEGAL SERVICE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT ,- 68.8(. 16289 STEMPF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC COIL SPACERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 44.1: 16290 DAN STENSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 247.5( 16291 RENEE STEWART-HESTER ALBUM/SLIDE REFILL-RECREATION ADMIN 27.6( 16292 STORM MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT 48.0( 16293 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ BALLISTIC VEST OUTERSHELLS/AMMUNITION/GUN 505.7f_ SCRUBBER/CLEANING ROD/BORE BRUSH-POLICE DEPT 16294 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC SERVICE-E P HIGH SCHOOL CIRCULATION STUDY/ 33092.3E DELL RD/SHORES OF MITCHELL LK/SCENIC HEIGHTS RD 16295 ANDREW SULLIVAN REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 19.0( A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 16296 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO COFFEE MAKER-COMMUNITY CENTER 223.6E 16297 NATALIE SWAGGERT MEETING EXPENSES/OCTOBER 93 CAR ALLOWANCE- 212.6E HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 16298 JEANE THORNE INC - SERVICE -PLANNING COMMISSION/POLICE DEPT/ 640.4( BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT 16299 THIRTY-THREE MINUTE PHOTO INC FILM/FILM PROCESSING-COMMUNITY 29.6f DEVELOPMENT DEPT 16300 TKDA & ASSOC INC SERVICE-CITY FACILITIES RECONSTRUCTION 19331.5, ADJACENT OF MITCHELL RD-TH212 16301 TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE FUEL GAUGE SENDING UNIT REPAIR-WATER DEPT 43.0: 16302 TRAUT WELLS REBUILT WELL PUMP MOTOR-WATER DEPT 7930.71 6303 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN-MTKA FALL LAWN CARE SERVICE-WATER DEPT 837.7: 41113 04 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN/ACETYLENE/ARGON-EQUIPMENT MAINT 104.0(. 305 TWIN CITY TESTING SERVICE-WALL PIPE PILER TESTING-WATER 1100.0( TOWER 16306 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC CAP SCREWS-SIGNS-STREET DEPT 79.3 16307 IVARS G UPENS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 66.0( 16308 USAQUATICS ROPE HOOK-POOL MAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER 13.8, 16309 VALERIES FRESH FLOWERS EXPENSES-CITY HALL 80.8` 16310 VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC FLUORIDE-WATER DEPT 1345.0 16311 VESSCO INC BATTERY/PADDLE/TRANSFORMER/CAPACITORS/ 239.0 DIADES/REGULATORS/RELAYS-WATER DEPT 16312 CHUCK VEST REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 32.0, A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 16313 VICOM INC OCTOBER WIRE MAINT AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY Uni 8.7- 16314 VISION ENERGY PROPANE CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 226.7: 16315 W P & R S MARS CO DRILL BITS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 241.8 16316 WARREN GORHAM LAMONT PUBLICATION-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 168.6 16317 WATER SPECIALTIES DOLPHIN POOL VACUUM REPAIR/SEALED MOTOR 633.3 ASSEMBLY-POOL MAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER 16318 WATER SPECIALTY OF MN INC LIQUID CHLORINE-POOL MAINT-COMMUNITY CTR 600.3 16319 WATERPRO METER WRENCH/WIRE/VISUAL READER/PVC PIPE/ 9438.8 STEEL APRON/COUPLINGS/VALVE BOX CLEANER/ ESKY WRAP/HYDRANT REPAIR/CURB BOXES/ TRAINING SOFTWARE FOR HANDHELD METER READING INTERROGATOR/5/8X3/4 1000 GAL METERS/REGISTERS/CEMENT-UTILITIES DIVISION 1111320 LEON WEILAND REIMBURSEMENT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASS 32.0 A & CLASS C DRIVERS LICENSE 7815420 NOVEMBER 2.1993 16321 WEST WELD NOZZLES/CUTTING LIPS/GROUND CLAMP/DISCS- 162.1: EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 322 JOEL WESTACOTT RUBBER TIE/TARPS-SUNBONNET DAY-HISTORICAL 36.01 & CULTURAL COMMISSION 16323 WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING DUES-FIRE DEPT 1241.0( 16324 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SVCS INC SERVICE-78TH ST TRAFFIC COUNT/TRAFFIC 3268.5( SIGNAL DESIGN FOR MITCHELL ROAD & TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 16325 THE WORK CONNECTION SERVICE-E P CITY CENTER 238.8( 16326 WP MAGAZINE MAGAZINE BINDERS-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 23.9( 16327 X-ERGON SEALING COMPOUND-WATER DEPT 34.8( 16328 ZACKS INC RUBBER PICKER/BUNGEE CORDS & STRAPS-PARK 376.9 MAINT/WATER DEPT 16329 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AIDSUPPLIES-CITY HALL/STREET MAINT/ 172.7 PARK MAINTENANCE 16330 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY HAND CLEANER/CARBURETOR CLEANER/DISPENSER- 484.6- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENTS 86760.9: 11000 NORWEST BANK BOND PAYMENTS 26625.0( 11000 FIRST TRUST BANK BOND PAYMENTS 20314.8: 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-01-93 - 14919.8: 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-15-93 15161.1 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-01-93 7081.4' 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-15-93 7194.4 44000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE SEPTEMBER 93 SALES TAX 35028.4: 14723 VOID OUT CHECK 303.9 15161 VOID OUT CHECK 209.7 5526 VOID OUT CHECK 82.8: 4Iit806 VOID OUT CHECK 1337.0 964 VOID OUT CHECK 65.0: 15968 VOID OUT CHECK 800.0' 15971 VOID OUT CHECK 1067.0: 15982 VOID OUT CHECK 24.9: 15985 VOID OUT CHECK 31.6 21520339 $1716334.9 MEMORANDUM - _- TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Julie, City Manager FROM: David Lindahl, Planner DATE: October 27, 1993 SUBJECT: ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR I-494 T ANSPORTATI DE 1 AND MANAGEMENT (TDM) PROGRAM 4i RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution to endorse laws of Minnesota 1993, Chapter 230, which authorize the-City to establish, by ordinance,is Transportation Demand Management (TDM)program. Fadorsing '" this legislation by resolution is necessary before the City can es act an actual TDM o µ See Attachment A for copy of the law. All five cities are in the of endorsingthe legislation byNovember 30, 1993. Adoptiort pegisla of these resolutions is a required step in the process before a TDM ordinance can be cosies ID in December 1993 or January 1994. BACKGROUND: The I-494 Corridor Commssion, comprised of the cities of Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Fnifla, Minnetonka, and Richfield, has drafted a TDM ordinance to help reduce peak hour trade congestion and maintain airquality. City attorneys from the five cities recommended that e enabling legislation be pursued that gives the cities authority to implement such an ordu� igoe._ The State Legislature approved this legislation in 1993. The legislation gives the five cities the authority to establish ordinances for the Fes"of reducing traffic congestion, air and noise pollution, and energy consumption along the I-494 corridor. The cities of Maple Grove and Plymouth also requested to be included in eie legislation and intend on joining the Corridor Commission. Although the legislation gives the cities the authority to charge fees and impose fines for violating the ordinance, Me Commission does not intend on doing either. The ordinance expected to be implemented on a yoluntary basis over the next five years. Phase two of t ordinance would be mandatory only if reasonable progress toward certain trip reduction f are not realized. A federal Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAG) grant for $160,000 has been ' awarded to the I-494 Corridor Commission to administer the program over the next two yews. • Additional federal funds will be pursued to fund the program through 1998. 23 - RESOLUTION 93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE APPROVING LAWS OFESOTA 1993, CHAPTER 230, RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ON 1-494 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie is the official governing body of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHIRF.AS, the Minnesota Legislature adopted Laws 1993, Chapter 230, which authorizes the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Richfield, Bloomington,Minnetonka,Maple Grove and Plymouth to establish transportation denland management programs for the purpose of reducing traffic congestion, air and noise pollution and energy consumption; and:WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie City Council has reviewed this legislation and finds that it would be beneficial for the City of Eden Prairie to have the authority to create, add, implement lement and enforce a transportation demand management program;P sPn" g P b' ;_ rr NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE OF EDEN PRAIRIE IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED: 1. That the City Council hereby approves Laws of Minnesota 1993, Chapter 230, which authorized the City of Eden Prairie to establish, by ordinance, a traffic demand management program. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the Secretary of State together with any other required documentation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, Subd. 3. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of November 1993. Mayor ATTEST. INV 23$. Ch. 229 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1993 1244 • The_ commissioner of natural resources, in sctung seasons under Minnesota Stahl.— 91 B.3 IT, shall consider a oandink the areas w ere may be taken wi z�tF muzz era-ding firearm& . , Presented to the governor May 14, 1993 Signed by the governor May'17, 1993, 10:56 a.m. CHAPTER 230—S.F.No. 1290 An act relating to local government;permitting the cities of Bloomington, Edina. Rich- .field, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka Maple Grove, and Plymouth to establish a transportation demand management program:providing fora transportation demand management plan for the capitol complex • BE TT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. BLOOMINGTON; RICHFIELD; EDINA; EDEN PRAIRIE; MINNETONKA; MAPLE GROVE; PLYMOUTH; TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Subdivision 1 DEFINITIONS. For the u ses of this section, "tran- s rtation d�nd management means the appp t ton of sirateaies invo vtn incennves and disincentives a —ego redirect travel to use hi occu- pancy ma�Tr away rbin peak pen s o trave�so as to duce t�e number off` • vehicle�, and accidents at critical times. Subd. 2. TDM PROGRAMS. The cja cou oils of the cities of Bloomin} ton it�a, ichfieki. Eden Prairie,,inneton n a reTrove, and Plymouth may, in consultation wi't c metros itan council establish by oar-name trans- rtatiQn demand management programs a lio-able employers c ornmer ev otril or owners of nonresi—enti ua buildings in each of t cities to mitigate � and fu�re traffic congestion in the cities ancf to reserve t1 envit�oament reducingair and noise pollution and energy,consumption. of the cities-eta c e reasotle Tees to employers and commercial develo or owners of nonresi ential buildingzs to administer the im emotion o tr or aadon deman manacment programs and impose ei ties __2E viola; bons of #die ordinance. The fees must not exceed S5O ann y per employer. Subd. 3. CAPITOL COMPLEX:The department of administration shall, in consultation with the regional transit-Ward the metropolitan council depart- •ment of transpor Uon capitol area arc1titecturaTT>oard and tie _tt. PPaul, eve o a trans rtation dernana mans enierit ri an for=thcca l=ol la. e 3�rtm_gni shaIll report theTto thelegislature by e�ruary L o . Sec. 1 EFFECTIVE DATE. ction i subdivision 2. is effective with respect lam of the cities of Bloo- min on inn Richfield ' c�en irie M netonka, Maori Move an4 lyni_ ou a da after co compliance b�that erty with Minnesota-Milan, section 4s 5.o2t su bdivi ston • Presented to the governor May 14, 1993 Signed by the governor May 17, 1993, 3:14 p.m. New language is indicated by underline, deletions by strikeevt. ATTACHMENT A 2 ( DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA C Cfl PRNR CONMSSION October 25, 1993 4.1 rratria . SECTION: Ordinances and Resolutions FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of PRNR DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Parks, Recreation & 11 Amendment to the City Code Regulating Use of t P,. Natural Resources Bicycle Ways PROPOSED ACTION: City staff request the City Council to approve an amendment to the City Code Regulating the Use of Bicycle Ways. The amendment defines what type of motor vehicle is allowed to use tltt trail system, as well as how it can use the trail system. OVERVIEW: The revision to this ordinance was initiated when a parent requested the City allow his disabled daughter to use an ATV on the trail system. The existing City Code would not allow any type of motor vehicle other than a maintenance vehicle or police vehicle on the trails system. City staff investigated other governmental agency rules that would allow a variety of motor vehicle types that are often used by the disabled. The restrictions described by this ordinance will accommodate a wide variety of motor vehicles commonly used by mobility impaired individuals.; 11) BL:mdd Attachment: Copy of Ordinance Action/Direction: 2 IVV • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE .. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING rivi CODE CHAPTER 7, ENTITLED "TRAFFIC REGULATIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION. 7.20 AMENDING SUBD. 1.B. AND ADDING C. AND SUBD. 5 WHICH RELATE TO. THE REGULATION AND USE OF BICYCLE WAYS, AND ADOPTING. BY REFERENC&" CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTIONS 7.99 THEREOF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 7.20, Subd. 1 _ B. is hereby- amended to read as follows: "Subd. 1. B. "Motor vehicle" means every vehicle which is self-propelled. Motor vehicle does not include a vehicle moved solely by human power, or a vehicle for a mobility- impaired person certified by the Chief of—Police as meeting the definition thereof in this Section. 40_,- Section 2 City Code Section 7 .20 is hereby amended by adding C. to Subd. 1 to read as follows : "C. "Vehicle for a mobility-impaired person" means an electric powered vehicle not exceeding 28 inches in width and 60 inches in length designed solely for, and used by a mobility- impaired person for locomotion, that is both capable and suitable for use in indoor pedestrian areas . Section 3. City Code Section 7 .20 is hereby amended by adding Subd. 5 to read as follows: "Subd. 5. A vehicle for mobility-impaired persons shall not be operated on a bicycle way in excess of 10 miles per hour or as otherwise marked on the bicycle way. Section 4. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 7 .99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. 40 Section 5 . This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. 234/41 • • FIRST READ at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1993, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1993 . ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor I PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1993 . S S 2n9 DATE: S'•;- 5•', ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 10/2 ►,/g3 �. ill SECTION: Report of Finance Director DEPARTMENT:. ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEE. 10:,. Finance 3rd Quarter General Fund Budget ` XI.G.1 . Status Report ,) , ,s, Recommended Action: Accept 3rd Quarter Budget Status Report and approve adjust* flee reported therein. Overview Originally projected at $3 million, unreserved fund balance at ie R now expected to be slightly over $3.6 million. Freeing `nP these` ; previously reserved for new city hall is primarily responsible fa :tb a.. increase. Revenues are expected to come in $25,500 under original,: estimates. Y, r Expenditures would appear to come in $734,550 over original estimates. Expenses for operations of the new City Center, extension of `the '•lease at 7600 Executive Drive, and encumbrances from 1992 were known. o be, wing in 1993 but could not be quantified when the budget was adopted in ligik December 1992. As planned, these costs were covered with'°the use of lip` designated fund balance. Net, expenses would be about $40,000 over budget. The primary project accounting for this difference is $87,600 in Community Center pool, AC renovations. Offsetting adjustments have occurred within projected revenues; ' . .:, significant of these include a $346,700 decline in expected tax �e due to accelerated tax rebate activity and a $235,000 increase .in ld z ,�, permit revenues. The June 30 Budget Status Report projected apear-end fund balan ' Of $3.7 million, with revenues coming in $11,800 under et and expendit; ea coming in $633,150 overbudget. Since the June 30 report the fol' ri major expenditure adjustments have been incorporated into the ,. et ; ¢ � forecast: $87,600 expenditure on Community Center pool IVAC sys ` and° " $35,000 additional funds needed on the CSAH #4° Duck Lake",'rail P0,1111pedestrian bridge project. Y 410' ' '=-' - . NOTES: ✓ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE MID- EAR BUDGET STATUS REPORT :* ¢' / i YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING SEPTE BER 30, 1993 i 7 • r. 1 . MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager John Frane, Finance Director Sara Ruth, Accountant DATE: 10/26/93 Attached is the General Fund Budget Status Report for year-to-date ending September 30, 1993. Originally projected at $3 million, unreserved fund balance at year-end is now expected at slightly over $3.6 million. YEAR-TO-DATE SUMMARY Changes in Projected Unreserved Fund Balance: $3, 002, 825 Original target (25,500) Decline in expected revenues (721, 050) Increase in expected expenditures, primarily due to City Center operations & 1992 encumbrances 220, 624 Addition of funds encumbered from 1992 1, 161,800 Addition of funds formerly reserved for new city $3,638, 699 New target hall Changes in Planned Revenues: $16, 108,800 Original budget (346,700) Decline in tax revenue 235,000 Increase in building permit revenues 47,900 New State Street Aid revenue (187,500) Transfer of water tower fees delayed to 1994 90,000 Increase in investment earnings revenue 33,000 Increase in recreation program fees 46,000 Increase in special assessment revenues 85,500 One-time revenue resulting from agreement with Edina re: Washington Ave 746,550 Increase in use of fund balance (15,200) Net result of all other adjustments $16,843,350 Changes in Planned Expenditures: $16,108,800 Original budget 235,500 Encumbrances carried over from budget 1992 376,300 City Center operations adjustment 81,400 July-October lease & taxes at 7600 Exec Dr 49,000 NSP electric rate adjustment (37,400) Hiring delay adjustments 35,000 CSAH#4 Duck Lake Trail bridge project overrun 87,600 Community Center HVAC system (92,850) Net result of all other adjustments $16,843,350 2392, RECAP OF CHANGES TO THE REVISED BUDGET • SINCE THE LAST BUDGET STATUS REPORT (dated June 30, 1993) Revenues $296,700 decline in property tax revenue due to increase in tax rebates awarded by the Tax Court $135, 000 additional increase in expected building permit revenues based on activity through the 3rd quarter; $1,235,000 total expected for the year $4,700 reduction in recycling grant revenue; consistent with solid waste expenditure activity $10,000 additional increase in youth recreation revenue; consistent with activity thru September $2 ,300 decline in beach revenue; due to weather conditions and construction activity at Riley Lake $3, 000 increase in historical/cultural revenue; consistent with activity thru September $46, 000 increase in special assessment revenue; includes $10,500 1-year assessment levied in 1992 for house demolition, also provides for delinquency collections and prepayments based on • activity so far this year $96,000 increase in miscellaneous revenue; $85,600 is one-time revenue realized with signing of Washington Avenue utilities joint services agreement with Edina Expenditures $35, 000 increase for CSAH#4 Duck Lake Trail/Pedestrian Bridge project carried over from 1992 (to be covered with one-time revenue realized with Washington Avenue utilities agreement with Edina) $12,000 reappropriated for purchase of Human Reources software; funds are available as "comparable worth maintenance" and "physical exam" expenditures are coming in well under budget. The comparable worth study originally planned for 1993 was not undertaken, and reduced physical exam expenditures resulted from delays in hiring. With changes approved by Council for acquisition of a copier, funds were reappropriated for City Center furnishings. $87,600 increase in Community Center capital outlay; Community Center HVAC system improvements, previously estimated at $75,000, 40 are now reflected at $87,600 (includes contract award, consultant, and design engineer) . $9, 000 has been transferred from Park Capital Outlay to Equipment • Maintenance for replacement of fueling system damaged by lightning. $13,200 decrease in Beaches; program completed for year, reduced expenditures due to weather conditions and construction activity Riley Lake $14,500 has been transferred from Contingency to the City Management division for the purchase of records and storage shelving at the new City Center. $10,000 has been transferred from Contingency to the Legislative division for the purchase of new Council table chairs. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION The transfer from the Liquor Fund continues to be reflected at the originally adopted amount of $200,000. Analysis of liquor operations through the 3rd quarter, however, indicates profits should be near $275,000. This additional $75,000 will be incorporated into budget plans as Council directs. The revised budget provides for Oct-Dec funding of the following delayed new staff hires approved for 1993: Appraiser, Police Officer, 1/2 Engineering Technician. Wages total $20,800 excluding benefits. The City's net operating cost on the City Center through September 30 was $209,500. Total net cost for the year is estimated at $376,300, including a $30,000 contingency allowance. A sharp increase in operating costs is expected for the final quarter of 1993, as the building becomes nearly fully occupied. Staff expects the entire $50,000 property/liability insurance deductible to paid out this year. (Deductible claims paid by the City usually run $15,000-$17, 000) . The City experienced equipment damage resulting from lightning strikes at the police station, fire station, and the fueling system at the PW garage this summer. The property/liability insurance budget within the General Shared Services division provides for the usual level of deductibles. Additional payments are expected to be covered with dollars from Contingency. In response to increased programming and activities, the Historical/Cultural division is running overbudget. The Recreation Manager expects to cover this cost overrun with increased historical/cultural revenues and transfers from other areas. The Recreation Manager will be following up on this issue. • Electric and gas costs at the Community Center are running higher than expected due to the new ice rink. An adjustment providing for increased utility costs was made at mid-year; however, it 2 394 appears that additional funds may be needed. Staff is working on 4) determining the actual cost overrun expected by year-end. Community Center revenues continue to be slightly better than originally anticipated. Spending levels should be near 75%. Explanation of those divisions running significantly over or under this level are as follows: Legislative (58%) - League dues for 1993 not yet paid Admin/Park Planning (66%) - Natural Resources study payments to consultant still coming through Park Maintenance (68%) - Chemical/fertilizer purchases will be made at year-end Community Center (82%) - electric and gas running higher than expected due to new ice rink Beaches and Youth (83%) - heavy activity during summer months Adult (65%) - some heavily subsidized programs were dropped during the year, should result in overall savings Historical/Cultural (101%) - increased programming and activity Human Resources (67%) - some cost savings resulting from hiring delays, planned study not undertaken due to availability Community Services (64%) - 3rd quarter payments to human service agencies being processed Fire (69%) - large positive variances in the following accounts: supplies, protective clothing, mileage, training General Shared Services (83%) - costs resulting from increased property/liability insurance deductible payments are expected to be covered from Contingency; also, Quality Mgmt consulting budget almost fully expended • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,1993 • * *REVENUES" • • 1993 • 19921993 BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL RECEIVED GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES CURRENT 10,980,700 10,980,700 DELINQUENCY ALLOWANCE (549,000) (411,400 NET CURRENT 10,007,331 10,431,700 10,569,300 5,335,549 DELINQUENT COLLECTIONS 35,870 100,000 (306,000 (152,911) PENALTY&INTEREST 133,847 135,000 56,700 28,369 TOTAL TAXES 10,177,048 10,666,700 10,320,000 5,211,007 50.5% LICENSES&PERMITS LIQUOR&BEER 103,093 105,000 118,000 16,066 13.6% BUILDING CONTRACTORS 3,705 2,000 3,500 2,580 73.7% CIGARETTE&OTHER LICENSES 16,695 23,000 20,000 5,966 29.8% DOG REGISTRATION 10,319 9,000 10,500 7,212 68.7% BUILDING PERMITS 1,182,233 1,000,000 1,235,000 991,112 80.3% CABLE TV 189,211 170,500 150,000 94,159 62.8% OTHER PERMITS 25,005 20,000 20,000 21,623 108.1% TOTAL LICENSES&PERMITS 1,530,261 1,329,500 1,557,000 1,138,718 73.1% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE POLICE PENSION AID 215,185 215,200 231,000 231,013 100.0% STATE STREET AID 47,900 43,106 90.0% SCHOOL LIAISON 45,166 48,500 48,500 0.0% RECYCLING GRANT 22,122 6,200 1,500 0.0% POLICE TRAINING 14,504 18,000 14,000 0.0% CIVIL DEFENSE 6,675 9,000 9,500 5,500 57.9% DISTRICTING 9,828 THER 8,544 4,800 0.0% TOTAL INTERGOVERNMTL 322,024 296,900 357,200 279,619 78.3% CHARGES FOR SERVICES GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING&ZONING 29,794 110,000 80,000 54,581 68.2% ENGINEERING&ADMIN 408,413 450,000 262,500 214,609 81.8% PUBLIC SAFETY PRINTS/REPORTS/ALARMS 24,325 20,000 10,870 54.4% IMPOUND FEES 3,343 4,400 4,400 2,500 56.8% RECREATION YOUTH PROGRAMS 150,422 130,000 160,000 161,120 100.7% ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 136,206 152,500 152,500 133,196 87.3% COMMUNITY CENTER 489,394 504,000 504,000 337,043 66.9% 2ND ICE ARENA 177,200 186,200 164,296 88.2% HISTORICAL 9,111 6,000 9,000 8,927 99.2% PARK USE FEES 23,449 13,000 13,000 14,133 108.7% BEACH/CONCESSIONS 12,578 14,000 4,700 4,612 98.1% SPECIAL EVENTS 15,692 15,000 15,000 15,257 101.7% ADULT PROGRAMS/ADAPTIVE 27,375 26,100 26,300 17,904 68.1% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SVCS 1,330,102 1,602,200 1,437,600 1,139,048 79.2% COURT FINES 200,487 210,000 210,000 153,531 73.1% INVESTMENT EARNINGS 246,242 150,000 240,000 180,000 75.0% OTHER REVENUE .PECIAL ASSESSMENTS 637,263 329,000 375,000 198,344 52.9% WFUL GAMBLING 7,379 32,000 10,000 6,806 68.1% INSURANCE PREMIUM REFUNDS 176,203 100,000 130,000 0.0% IDR CHARGES 62,906 100,000 75,000 66,108 88.1% \r STREET LIGHTING 62,478 40,000 60,000 40,684 67.8% `i MISCELLANEOUS 35,473 50,000 126,000 122,412 97.2% 141 TOTAL OTHER 981,702 651,000 776,000 434,354 56.0% 1\1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,1993 * * *REVENUES* * * 1993 4110 1992 1993 REVISED 9/30/93 % ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL RECEIVED OPERATING TRANSFERS IN(FROM) UTILITY FUND 40,000 50,000 50,000 37,500 75.0% T.I.F.DEVELOPMENT FUND 200,000 150,000 150,000 112,500 75.0% LIQUOR FUND 198,000 200,000 200,000 150,000 75.0% CDBG FUND 17,000 1 OTHER 8,993 TOTAL TRANSFERS IN 446,993 417,000 400,000 300,000 75.0% TOTAL REVENUES 15,234,859 15,323,300 15,297,800 8,836,277 57.8% USE OF FUND BALANCE 187,100 933,650 0.0% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 15,234,859 15,510,400 16,231,450 8,836,277 54.4% EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FUND EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES 598,400 568,100 0.0% SALE OF PROPERTY 9,650 14,000 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 4,000 USE OF FUND BALANCE 241,681 29,800 0.0% TOTAL EQUIP ACQUIS FUND 255,331 598,400 611,900 0 0.0% GRAND TOTAL $15,490,190 $16,108,800 $16,843,350 $8,836,277 52.5% 0 • 2397 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: September 30,1993 " "EXPENDITURES" " • 1992 1993 1993 ADOPTED 1992 9/30/92 % ADOPTED REVISED 9/30/93 %. BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDED OPERATING EXPENSES: x LEGISLATIVE 86,600 89,455 64,962 73% 113,400 112,400 65,361 58% F1.FCTIONS 80,500 100,727 59,679 59% 21,600 21,600 18,917 88% CITY MANAGER 174,300 200,868 150,223 75% 231,900 226,100 164,620 73% ASSESSING DEPT 312,200 304,309 225,573 74% 348,400 333,200 243,938 73% INSP/SAFETY/FACILITIES BLDG INSPECTION 526,900 526,817 398,335 76% 552,000 555,500 421,993 76% SAFETY 58,200 56,433 43,666 77% 62,700 62,700 41,690 66% FACILITIES 612,800 609,367 445,479 73% 531,900 1,003,050 705,401 70% PARKS/RECREATION ADMIN&PARK PLAN 171,700 165,800 128,764 78% 201,600 191,600 126,243 66% PARK MAINTENANCE 804,300 776,051 567,861 73% 874,900 874,900 595,292 68% REC ADMIN&SP EVENTS 203,000 157,231 123,828 79% 186,400 147,800 115,670 78% COMMUNITY CENTER 563,600 640,520 454,267 71% 664,800 686,100 565,271 82% BEACH 68,500 60,327 60,115 100% 84,400 65,000 64,139 99% ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 178,700 165,360 123,733 75% 175,600 175,600 138,082 79% RECREATION-YOUTH 215,000 229,754 193,092 84% 247,600 253,800 211,645 83% RECREATION-ADULT 81,200 88,036 61,816 70% 102,200 132,800 86,314 65% RECREATION ADAPTIVE 46,000 55,679 44,951 81% 56,900 61,900 47,477 77% HIST&CUL ARTS 45,600 49,967 41,719 83% 47,600 47,600 48,098 101% FINANCE 275,100 271,234 210,915 78% 286,000 289,000 215,955 75% HUMAN RESOURCES 144,300 147,157 112,898 77% 149,100 137,100 91,290 67% COMMUNITY SERVICES 149,300 143,644 93,790 65% 273,400 254,400 161,557 64% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 354,600 314,107 235,521 75% 364,000 336,300 257,603 77% LICE DEPT LICE 2,887,800 2,885,114 2,192,579 76% 3,104,000 3,106,900 2,263,876 73% DEFENSE 25,800 9,178 8,195 89% 12,600 12,600 3,184 25% ANIMAL CONTROL 78,200 66,372 47,328 71% 80,800 73,600 52,774 72% FIRE 473,900 380,624 293,617 77% 438,300 423,100 291,866 69% PUBLIC WORKS DEPT ENGINEERING 641,400 604,289 451,976 75% 611,100 620,800 464,261 75% STREETS AND TRAFFIC 1,163,400 1,143,089 970,901 85% 1,269,700 1,278,400 944,528 74% EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 583,800 546,683 384,637 70% 629,100 611,800 444,260 73% STREET LIGHTING 381,500 393,359 283,972 72% 412,000 443,800 328,653 74% SOLID WASTE MANAGEMT 31,900 26,132 19,628 75% 6,200 1,500 413 28% SHARED SERVICES GENERAL 429,800 402,037 321,064 80% 447,900 461,600 381,644 83% DATA PROCESSING 98,500 102,091 81,158 79% 130,000 130,000 90,135 69% PUBLIC INFORMATION 70,700 61,264 53,455 87% LEGAL COUNSEL 105,000 114,949 34,659 30% 160,000 150,000 72,663 48% EMPLOYEE BENEFITS &TRAINING 1,853,500 1,750,297 1,314,955 75% 1,824,800 1,824,800 1,363,100 75% RESERVE CONTINGENCY 157,000 102,787 48,119 47% 130,000 101,000 36,037 36% TOTAL PERSONAL SVCS, COMMODITIES,AND CONTRACTED SVCS 14,134,600 13,741,108 10,347,430 75% 14,832,900 15,208,350 11,123,950 73% NOTES: Spending level should be approximately 75%at September month-end. • 0-. ,,� ...,. ., ..1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: September 30,1993 " "EXPENDITURES" " • 1992 1993 1993 ADOPTED 1992 9/30/92 % ADOPTED REVISED 9/30/93 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDEE CAPITAL OUTLAY: LEGISLATIVE 1,835 1,835 100% 10,000 0% CITY MANAGER 5,700 835 537 64% 6,300 26,800 10,077 38% ASSESSING 700 829 426 51% 6,000 5,800 0% INSPECTIONS 3,000 2,061 0% 1,800 ' 15,200 9,971 66% SAFETY 1,400 _ 500 500 424 85% FACILITIES 13,000 11,047 1,185 11% 13,400 13,400 5,628 42% ADMIN/PARKPLANN 400 843 843 100% PARKS MAINTENANCE 8,864 0% PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY 293,100 244,245 22,528 9% 226,400 250,300 216,704 87% RECREATION-SP.EVENTS 500 1,663 0% 500 500 0% COMMUNITY CENTER 16,200 64,506 62,838 97% 180,200 267,800 15,389 6% BEACH 500 500 329 66% ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 200 1,255 0% 200 200 0% RECREATION-YOUTH 500 180 0% 3,500 3,500 770 22% RECREATION ADULT 900 998 0% 8,900 8,900 5,084 57% RECREATION-ADAPTIVE 3,900 3,900 0% HIST&CULT ARTS 600 _ 600 600 0% FINANCE 889 0% 9,000 9,000 9,198 102% HUMAN RESOURCES 2,500 2,022 2,514 124% 12,000 0% COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5,800 3,463 0% 2,000 4,400 2,345 53% POLICE 852 852 100% 83,600 74,600 65,475 8°/ CIVIL DEFENSE 13,500 13,500 100% 3,500 3,500 2,809 /c ANIMAL CONTROL FIRE 1,168 810 69% 36,000 36,000 17,685 49% ENGINEERING 1,400 1,149 1,144 100% 6,800 6,800 0% STREETS 173,000 65,293 55,175 85% 9,300 182,300 181,719 100% STREET LIGHTING 4,000 4,000 0% EQUIP MAINTENANCE 6,000 5,602 4,964 89% 25,000 37,000 21,869 59% GENERAL SHARED SVCS 5,000 5,000 0% DATA PROCESSING 3,000 33,000 33,000 06/o PUBLIC INFORMATION 4,500 EMPL BENEFITS&TRAINING 600 600 0% TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 532,400 433,099 169,151 39% 670,500 1,016,100 565,476 56% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,667,000 14,174,207 10,516,581 74% 15,503,400 16,224,450 11,689,426 72% RESERVATIONS OF FUND BALANCE: NEW CITY HALL 700,000 700,000 0% CAPITAL FACILITIES 400,000 400,000 0% PW/PARKS STORAGE FACILITY SEVERANCE OBLIGATIONS 30,000 30,000 0% 7,000 7,000 0% TOTAL RESERVATIONS 1,130,000 1,130,000 0 0% 7,000 7,000 0 0% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 15,797,000 15,304,207 10,516,581 69% 15,510,400 16,231,450 11,689,426 72% • 0" %,rNr CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: September 30,1993 • " "EXPENDITURES" " 1992 1993 1993 ADOPTED 1992 9/30/92 % ADOPTED REVISED 9/30/93 •/. BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDED EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES: ELECTIONS 37,100 37,771 37,771 100% INSPECTIONS 15,600 15,600 13,391 86% PARKS 117,600 118,342 40,668 34% 72,000 75,200 56,936 76% COMMUNITY CENTER 15,200 8,330 4,297 52% 13,000 19,900 16,840 85% POLICE 133,700 202,807 182,376 90% 124,800 129,500 69,710 54% FIRE 67,500 53,933 39,680 74% ENGINEERING 2,900 2,238 2,238 100% 4,500 19,500 18,988 97% STREETS 164,400 175,657 171,615 98% 271,700 266,700 235,590 88% EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55,000 40,133 37,530 94% 53,300 50,000 27,303 55% GENERAL SHARED SERVICES 43,500 35,500 0% UNALLOCATED 427 0% EQUIP ACQ FUND TOTAL 593,400 639,638 516,175 81% 598,400 611,900 438,758 72% GRAND TOTAL 16,390,400 15,943,845 11,032,756 69% 16,108,800 16,843,350 12,128,184 72% SI • 2 0 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: September 30,1993 * *FUND BALANCE* * III ACTUAL FUND BALANCE as of September 30,1993 RESERVATIONS BALANCE ACTUAL ACTUAL OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/92 REVENUES EXPENDITURES BALANCE 9/30/93 RESERVED for Encumbrances 220,624 (220,624) 0 RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses 48,521 (48,521) 0 RESERVED for P.W.Storage Facility 325,000 325,000 RESERVED for Severance Obligations 243,000 243,000 RESERVED for New City Hall 1,361,800 1,361,800 RESERVED for Capital Facilities 400,000 400,000 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 3,189,925 8,836,277 (11,420,281) 605,921 5,788,870 8,836,277 (11,689,426) 0 2,935,721 PROJECTED FOR YEAR-END 1993 per Originally Adopted Budget RESERVATIONS BALANCE ACTUAL ACTUAL OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/92 REVENUES EXPENDITURES BALANCE 12/31/93 RESERVED for Encumbrances 220,624 220,624 RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses 48,521 4 21 RESERVED for P.W.Storage Facility 325,000 RESERVED for Severance Obligations 243,000 7,000 2 0 j RESERVED for New City Hall 1,361,800 1,361,800 RESERVED for Capital Facilities 400,000 400,000 j UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 3,189,925 15,323,300 (15,503,400) (7,000) 3,002,825 5,788,870 15,323,300 (15,503,400) 0 5,608,770 PROJECTED FOR YEAR-END 1993 per 1993 Revised Budget RESERVATIONS BALANCE BUDGETED BUDGETED OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/92 REVENUES EXPENDITURES BALANCE 12/31/93 RESERVED for Encumbrances 220,624 (220,624) 0 RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses 48,521 48,521 RESERVED for P.W.Storage Facility 325,000 325,000 RESERVED for Severance Obligations 243,000 7,000 250,000 RESERVED for New City Hall 1,361,800 (1,361,800)* 0 RESERVED for Capital Facilities 400,000 400,000 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 3,189,925 15,297,800 (16,003,826) 1,154,800 3,638,699 5,788,870 15,297,800 (16,224,450) (200,000) 4,662,220 *Assumes that [all but$200,000 of] the$1.3 million set aside over 1991 and 1992 for New City Hall is unreserved and made available for drawing down future years levies. $200,000 was transferred to the City Center Acq/Remodel Fund. ** Actual total fund balance as of Sept 30($2.9 million)will grow to$4.6 million by year-end with receipt of 2nd half taxes in • December less expenditures incurred during the 4th quarter. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson,Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J.Julie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Eager, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Council Recorder PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL • L APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 2, IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE REGARDING USE OF BICYCLE WAYS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION C. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR MILLER PARK D. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WINDFIELD 4TH ADDITION (located at the Southwest Quadrant of Dell Road and TH 5) E. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WINDFIELD 5TH ADDITION City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 16, 1993 Page Two 4111 F. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR CREEK KNOLLS. BLUFFS EAST 12, I.C. 52-194 AND I.C. 52-256 G. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR BERGER D ORE DRIVE, LC. 52-284 H. APPROVE AGREEMENT REGARDING STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WITH CARL MANSON I. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SOUTHWEST METRO TO PURCHASE UP TO 22 VEHICLES FOR USE 1N ITS SMALL BUSINESS OPERATION J. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR BOULDER WALLS AT MILLER PARK V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. SHADY OAK RIDGE 4TH ADDITION by Joe Ruzic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.28 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.28 acres into 4 lots. Location: Northwest corner of Rowland Road and Old Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution for PreLmMary Plat) Continued from October 19, 1993 B. BREAM TOWNHOUSES by Bream Builders. Request for PUD Concept Review on 419 acres, PUD District Review on 6.71 acres with waivers, Zoning District Amendment in the RM-6.5 Zoning District on 6.71 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 6.71 acres into 11 lots. Location: West of Dell Road and North of Pioneer Trail. (Resolution for PUD Concept; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-6.5 Zoning District and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) C. BENTEC ADDITION II by Bentec Engineering Corporation. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 1.58 acres. Location: 13050 Pioneer Trail. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 16, 1993 Page Three VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. PETITION FROM THE RESIDENTS OF TOPVIEW ADDITION FOR PARK IMPROVEMENT B. REQUEST BY BEV AND BRAD AHO FOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON PROPERTY AT 12742 GORDON DRIVE IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCI ME BERS 40 B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Set Monday, December 13, 1993. 7:00 PM, for a Joint Meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission, and Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission to discuss planning for downtown C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY G. REPORT OF FINANCE DIRECTOR XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT • MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL SIJFJSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Community Training Room 8080 Mitchell Road COUNCrLMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Planner David Lindahl PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND ROLL CALL Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. Harris was absent. PRESENTATION BY COUNCILMEMBER PATRICIA PIDCOCK Councilmember Pidcock presented a rebate check in excess of$50,000 from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust to the City of Eden Prairie. IllI. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Jullie added Item XLE.1., Plans for Snowplowing. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda as submitted and amended. Motion carried unanimously. - II. OPEN PODIUM Jim Eckblad, 15406 Village Woods Drive, thanked the Council and Staff for their response to his concerns about the bogs on Red Rock Lake. M. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. OCTOBER 19. 1993 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the October 19, 1993, meeting, with the motion under Item III.B., City Council Meeting Held Tuesday, October 5, 1993 amended to read "Jessen moved..." Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. RESOLUTION #93-209. APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF DELLWOOD ESTATES C. RESOLUTION#93-210. APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF PETER ANDREA 2ND ADDITION 11-/b-93 City Council Minutes 2 November 2, 1993 D. AUTHORIZE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH AEO ENGINEERING FOR 2.0 MILLION GALLON ELEVATED TANK E. APPROVAL OF BID FOR DEMOLITION OF HOUSE AND GARAGE LOCATED AT 8018 EDEN ROAD F. OPTIMISTS REQUEST TO SELL CHRISTMAS TREES AT ROUND LAKE PARK G. RESOLUTION #93-211. AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEITED LAND MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve Items A-G on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. VACATION 93-08. PART OF THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER LOTS 3 AND 4. BLOCK 1. JENKINS ADDITION (Resolution) There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the public hearing and adopt Resolution 93-212, vacating these easements. Motion carried unanimously. 4110 VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION #93-213, APPROVING LAWS OF MINNESOTA 1993. CHAPTER 230. RELATING TO TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT ON I-494 Jullie explained the enabling legislation which would allow the I-494 Corridor Commission to establish a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program by Ordinance. The next step for the City was to adopt a resolution concurring with the legislation before enacting an actual TDM Ordinance. Councilmembers questioned how the program would be administered. Lindahl replied that it would be administered by the Regional Transit Board. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve Resolution #93-213, approving Laws of Minnesota 1993, Chapter 230, relating to the State Laws for the I-494 Transportation Demaro Management Program. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes 3 November 2, 1993 40 B. 1ST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE REGARDING USE OF BICYCLE WAYS Staff presented an ordinance which would allow a wide variety of motor vehicles commonly used by mobility-impaired persons to be operated on the City's trail system. There were no comments from the audience. Councilmembers expressed concern that such an ordinance might result in the use of oversized vehicles such as ATV's which would be dangerous on narrow trails. Pauly noted that the ordinance contains restrictions on the vehicle size, use and speed. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the 1st Reading of the ordinance amending City Code regarding the use of bicycle ways. Motion carried unanimously. VIII.PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS IDA. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Set Tuesday. November 23, 7:00 PM. for the City Council Workshop Jullie noted that the Transportation Demand Management Program will be scheduled for this workshop. Councilmembers concurred with the suggested date and time for the'workshop. C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Report on Snowplowing Dietz reported on the agreement reached by a Labor Management Subcommittee that would allow the union members to handle the City snowplowing this year. He commended the employees on their cooperative efforts as they worked with Staff to reach the agreement and to organize and prioritize the work. • F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY G. REPORT OF FINANCE DIRECTOR 3 City Council Minutes 4 November 2, 1993 1. Third Quarter Budget Status Report Jullie reviewed the Third Quarter Budget Status Report, noting that the unreserved fund balance is now expected to be slightly over $3.6 million at year-end. Questions were raised about that the Comparable Worth Study. Jullie replied that considerable time has been spent revamping the study and that it is still in process. Dawson said that we have switched to using Staff resources rather than using a consultant as we did on the original study. Lambert, Ruth and Dawson responded to Councilmembers questions regarding revenue figures for the Community Center and cable TV and operating costs for the 2nd ice rink. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to accept the 3rd quarter Budget Status Report and approve the adjustments reported therein. Motion carried unanimously. XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII.ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Tenpas closed the meeting at 8:15 p.m. • �I—Ifs-9� 4 OP CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • DATE: acJan rzrairla SECTION: Consent Calendar 11-1643. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Pat Solie Clerk's License Application List MA • These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FA1ILY & COMM.) GAS FITTER Nordic Steel , Inc. Cherry Plumbing & Heating Steinkraus Construction Galaxy Mechanical Mark Yaeger Swanson & Schiager Plumbing PLUMBING Al 's Master Plumbing • Wayne Dauwalter Plumbing Galaxy Mechanical • frip Action/Direction: li • DATE: 4 ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 16, 1993 SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Parks, Recreation, and Second Reading of Ordinance regarding Use of Natural Resources 33r st Bicycle Ways; Approve Summary for Publication 4, Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Council: * Approve the Second Reading g of the Ordinance which would permit certain types at, powered vehicles to be used on City bicycle ways by mobility-impaired persons. * Approve the Summary for Publication. Overview: The City Council approved first reading of the proposed ordinance on November 2, 1993. The - would amend Section 7.20 of the City Code. It would permit vehicles typically uszlce.dby mobility . persons to be used on City bicycle ways, subject to certification by the Chiefof Police. • Attachments: Proposed summary for publication NOTES: 410 .44 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MIN NESO ::* ORDINANCE . AN ORDINANCE CITY IRIE,NO",A+IINI�TF.SOTATA , AMENDING CI' ' CI E CHAPTER 7, ENTITLOF THED "TRAFFICOF REGULPRAATIONS BY DINGT Al �`AMENDING SUBD. LB. AND ADDINGEDEN C. AND SUBD. S'WHICH RELATE TO THEION 7. 24) REGULATION AND USE OF BICYCLE WAYS, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CEO�E CHAPTER 1 AND SECTIONS 7.99 THEREOF. THE CICY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COSY, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance defines motorized vehicles typically used by mobility-i tpairedwhich will be permitted on City bicycle ways. Such vehicles must be certified for use on City bid mays the Eden Prairie Chief of Police. Tffective Date: This ordinance takes effect upon its publication. Adopted by the Eden Prairie City Council oil November if 9 Is/ Douglas B. Tebpas. Mayor Attest: /sl John D. F • e. City Cleric (A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available from the City Clerk's Office.) • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION AGENDA November 10, .1991 , . , SECTION: Consent Calendar FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect ./ DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Parks, Recreation & Recommendation to Approve Change Order#2 for IV. C Natural Resources Miller Park 11110111116, r RECOMMENDATION: The park, recreation and natural resources staff recommend approval of Change Order #2 for Miller. ' This results in an increase of$35,462.50 to the Contract with Richard Knutson, Inc. CHANGES: 1. The playground was staked and field verified by staff before grading. A change was made to keep the playstructure up on flat grades and away from Mitchell Lake. It also kept the playground i b with the Americans With Disabilities Act. The change lengthened the path resulting in more dial and labor costs. The total for this change is $1,388. 2-4. A number of areas within the park were final graded and seeded, but the turf was not established before ; heavy rains washed away seed as well as undermining the soil. The berm on the north side-of the park; • screening neighbors from the ballfields, were washed out numerous times. Dirt was removed from; catch basins and low areas and replaced on the berm. Seed was also replaced, this time wtt l=straw :.' mulch and a polypropelene net to help hold the seed in place. These changes totalled $33,o0.50. 5. The shoreline around the playstructure was actually steeper than the original;topography showed. Same. very large boulders found on site were moved into place along the shoreline. This Change cleaned up the marshy shoreline and reduced the steep slope down to the lake, eliminating a potential Maintensfice. problem. Using the boulders on site and paying for dozer work was less expensive than paying to haul them off site. The cost for this change was $1,595: 6. Drinking fountains were specified because they were vandal resistant and because'of the Hof winterizing them. The standard detail from the manufacturer was used on the plans. At the,dine ofe installation, staff discovered there was no way to access the internal workings of the drig fountain:' without breaking concrete. An access box was'added to each drinking fountain facilitating;fie ' maintenance. The cost for this change was $760.00 . . The total increase for Change Order #2 is $35,464.50, bringing the contract total amount to $2 608,055.2G. Money from the bond referendum will be used to pay for these changes. A 3% contingency funttivat ate' as part of the budget process for such changes. BPC:mdd ; 4111 Action/Direction: November 16, 1993 1 ,. ; . CITY COUNCIL AGENDA x .F_ are _ ��,.� ..�;�. •� ;; SECTION: Consent Calendar November. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. , Engineering Division ,; • Jeffrey Johnson Final Nat Approval of Windfield 4th Addition V.D.. ti _ Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: * Adopt the resolution approving the finalplat of Windfield 4th Addition su - o, P PP g bj following: • A 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$350 2. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$600 3. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$2,193_ • • y Overview: The City Council approved the preliminary plat December 3, 1991,with the Second tl tg of the Rezoning Ordinance and approval of the Developer's Agreement following on Jatturl,. 1992.• The Windfield 4th Addition consists of 15 single family lots within the Windfield PUD. 4 cc: Dan Herbst, Pemtom Companies • 410 November 16, 1993 Item No. IV.D.1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA lup RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WINDFIELD 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of WINDFIELD 4TH ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 46 2 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations;and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:. A. Plat approval request for Windfield 4th Addition is approved upon comp nce with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated November 10, 1993. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certi of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the forming provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 16, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk November 16, 1993 Item No. IV.D.2 • +r q DATE. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA x " November 16, 1993 r SECTION: Consent Calendar - Y DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. ', Engineering Division Jeffrey Johnson Final Plat Approval of Windfield Sth Addition IV.E. Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action; • * Adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Windfield 5th Addition subject to following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$844 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$5,141 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$1,160 Overview: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council after on January 21, December 3, 1991, with Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and Developer's Agreement following shortly 1992. This proposal consisting of platting 29 single family lots has an additional phase within } Windfield PUD. cc: Dan Herbst, Pemtom Companies 4• • November 16, 1993 Item No. IV.E.1 l.fr�SF x4 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE . HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION'APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WINDFIELD 5TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of WINDFIELD 5TH ADDITION has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 4fi2' of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulati and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNC : A. Plat approval request for Windfield 5di Addition is approved upon. compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this. , 0 plat dated November 1Q, 1993. • B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of ties Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance. with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the •Eden Prairie City Council on November 16, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk November 16, 1993 Item No. IV.E.3 DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar November 16, 1993 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Approve Change Order No. 2 for Creek Knolls, Engineering Division Bluffs East 12th IC 52-194 and IC 52-256 IV.F Recommended Action: s Recommend approval of Change Order No. 2 for Creek Knolls, Bluffs East I2th III ,..., :5 ,,,, , 41110 November 16, 1993 Item No. IV.F.1 J . . CHANGE ORDER #2 Date:, 11/10/93 To: City of Eden Prairie City Improvement Contract #: 52-194, 52-256, 52-242 Project Name: Creek Knolls, Bluffs E 12th, Valley View Sidewalk Contractor: Nodland Construction Co. , Inc. Engineer: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inca Nature of Changes: 1. Add sewer and water service on Trotters Path due to lot revisions on Bluffs East 10th Addition. 2. Add sewer and water service on Bluff Road to align with lot on Bluffs East 8th Addition. 3. Add concrete collars to backyard catch basins as required for fine grading lots. Adjustment to Contract Price: 1. Add labor and material costs, lump sum: $ 4,750.00 2. Add labor and material costs, lump sum: $ 4,000.00 3. Add labor and material costs, 3 @ $125 each: $ 375.00 $ 9,125.00 Summary of Contract Changes: Contract Amount prior to Change Order #2: $377,487.80 Net Increase resulting from Change Order #2: 9,125.00 Current Contract Amount including Change Order #2: $386,612.80 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: Hansen Thorp�� Pellinen Olson Inc. City of Eden Prairie By /t..e/41Lf "dvz By 411_Date /V-fU-1,.? Date s�= THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: By Date /e 91-'3 • 41110 — ,•-- . ,-- ,.,,, • --....,-.4.-,--,-..-;,,-,,,,,-,- ,---,:.•':',.,:-`AqiCo.:,i''''''‘`-‘1•. -,4f•i4-:-.,.t:-:.- 1--"..k,'. , -,......,.4... ,-';.t•.x.....,--.,..,-;,,,,.4-,,-,,..$---•.''--,:!!'.,-:'-'--,-.;'''' ,...' , : , '',.--„,--. •::,,:r.-:;;.:-.,,,-4,; •,,747,4 ;,..;-•.;z„:;finr4k7r,-r+ta.i.-*497:,,,4'..1,74,./.!,,,if----.,;..-... .,.r.,:ift.:, 4i, ,i--,?;'*•;?;._..-z-...,04",..S.:,:.',!.;'-''-i-..-4': It14.: 4"- '•-.,.. ,,;,,,:',..--4,-_,i4frA,rnizrtf..71.,, ,,LM.....,,,,Ir'r=1;i''''4"'''''''F. itli:41,4::,"--;;;"i„-;,,i;-7:`,.,,`.•-,•1,;1'--=;,-• - •• '. -..,..: ,:.:,,,,,-„,-„,,,,;,..„ „.;,,,,,,,,,,-,*114.A.„1,44,,,,r7,,,•(,..,r 5 t.,..447e ,.--•••••,.;.;„,.;,,,.-;fic.4#--,.. , A.,...!--4.,.....iti,,.,......•.-:,.,:,..it.'f:;',-1/4,-,.--;-..T7-1--•:=:,,:. ....:•,-5•,;;;:,„•,..,..„.44,,;;;;.,i4.,-;„,73014:.•itt,•-44#4.-•,...it*-.,,...---, A .--,• -,..- ,_:,-,„,,, ,4-;:,,....:.-L-4,'It"i'''' •''..:1"'`;,':...":"r-4.* . • *,4X..trZilitZ47'.1,4. -4,',,:`7-1, ,-44.4,50''',1:.':-?-':'''''':'• -' - ' " --''''. ' . . ,,..,,,.4„.,-,.,, rir..„.....,„„..,,,v,.,,,. , • *•,,-,• :, , . , Orke..4 .7,„:44'il;1::-.7,1----':' ii.i.".''' '11-. '''•"''' ' ' . ' '''4.4..,-. '''.-.•r '''.:'-.?,':.-.."1,'.1__:,:'."-r,'-li"-"'',,ii:Z:::^e2a40(..'41 '`Ci.A5-t.....;-,4'.!-,T;;;Y...A;;;j?:.-..'; "::`,.. '-'772,:S.a.,,;.,:, ,,,r.t.T,, ..DA .....,.. ....,,,,at.„, ..rt: ..q.7, ''''',.,, '',.,,i.--, . • r,',,,,7v._,.., ..,,,' --,4,,„,,,;,, ,,,,,,,.,-........Li.,....;;Ai,,,--,4,:•44,,,,=1, ----,..-,'"'-':',..-747 7;,-,-;.7.',,,,rfoE,, : . ......4,...‘,-,,,.....„4,-,,..... ,-7.ctiFtl.., -,•' .1- :,:!, : COUNCILAGENDA.:::•••.-..:,...._•,_-.,-..,-:-..-...,--,•..:::-.1-.4„..:•-•:-;...„.;.„-„4.-.;,-,,,,..,,.. .....,-;,-:.i.-.-,:c....;.4., ,. ,... . ,;,,, ',,v ''..,..'1'!...1:-.„.....-- -- „„,--;-;--, --.......,„....,- --- „4,..;,.....,,,,,.,.,-;,i,.,,,,.i,.•;i-i.--,4"-------------,. .-- .'..;...:'-....; ,.:,..:;.,,,,,4',N-.-,'- ' '':;;'.....::-'4'':f*'.'tt.., ,-,:.‘r -v.1.--,-- ':1,..'-',.:••' .4.,...-.---,-.--"--.,---,...-- ."". '7.... I-- taw,,:-.-.. i ; 4•A:.p.,-..-:,,,,, 47'. i:CTION.---'Consent Calendar • •,..•-•••-• •-• .-• ,--,-•-----.-- N 6 41 ....-...... .A..... .........• . . ... _ - - ••,..:-.,,-.:.._•:..,,r;---,,....:•,,,•• -- -:.-tP4'•••' --- •• • . . . . ITEIVI NC)..--1;•-,--.,;--• ----• .,:-.r.i. '','•:-'.."1:•,--.1 DEPARTMENT i•,"-,:::;,--.-t,:i7-...., ITEIVI DESCRIPTION: -- : .•• .. ••, 4,„-4, ..,,,- Tfij4 •-:411.,4-4,7'...1'..i.,1. '""''''''.47'rlio''''1''''' ',7'........ 'Approve Change Order No. 1 for Berger Drive/ . , , ,•,. ...,4 ,__,,,4,4„,i, ,;,,, .•• - ..,•,:;„,..., -;•,.,,,,,,„..,.. .,•;•...--.....4'',..f.'...,*, Engineering Division .. Lakeshore Drive IC 52-284 ,. • . .. . • • • Recommended Action: • i . i 1 •,•,: .•- Recommend approval of Change Order No. 1 With Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. . .;• -' • „ •,. - •..:.•• ,-- . ,,,,:-.•-.-•;.! , _ , ,. ...... • • ,...• •. ..• . • . . -. • , . „ . .-. • : , . , . . • • • • • ' • --.... •• . , . • , :,.. ... .•• . -,_. -.I, -.,.-•:. . • •. : ..-4... , . . .4. .... 4 ..., .4 . .,. . • -., .• _ ••.-•-:, • . . , . . _..,,,.,, ., ..... . , 4 . ,,. _. , . T, , ..• -,,, ..1',,,: ••;:.• ..•,.. . • • „.._. ._•. . . : .... . ..,-.. • •-.• 4,44, , ... . ... . . . . , • .. . . , . 4. • 0 • , . „ . • •• ,..,_. , ,"; .. ,, •. . ,.. , . , . , . , ,, November 16, 1993 • .1 • ...., .- . . ..:4- . •• -.., . .. .. , . ... . . . .. . . . ..._ . . . . 4 . ._ •• . . • • .... - tin , f ,.., $� ' CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - :, I.C. 52-284 . Date: November 3, 1993 • • Project Name: Berger Drive/Lakeshore Drive Improvements = =" • Contractor: Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. '. -.-,.:-,.:', '",:,...i.'-',..7-1.,.12:11'.f.it:-,1. ,:ii--'-'...1'.11'''- Engineer: City of Eden Prairie Nature of Changes: Additional work required due to realignment of and•wider g of r, Drive and Lakeshore Drive L Construct keystone retaining wall on south side of Lakeshore Drive Labor and Material Costs . . . $ 2,'70}.13 2. Regrading of yard because of new street construction on the east side of Berger Drive Labor and Material Costs • $ 1, .5 , • TOTAL C IANGE ORDER COST . . . • . . . . . . • . . . 4,15 .55 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT CHANGES: •' • • Original Contract Amount . . . .• , . . $ 8fl, + .OE? • Net Increase resul •ting from Change Order No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,615:'�- • Current Contract Amount including Change Order No. 1 . . , , . . . $ 84,f 15.55' THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: 'THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACt t F CITY OF,EDEN PRAIRIE DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING By By , 7 . - % -. - .i.:410_ _ __.,,_,„ 1 Date Date . . f ... . ,.: Jf ' Noyem►ber. 16, 1993 2• ` _ ::. X F au DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • -- SECTION: Consent Calendar November � DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. .. Approve Agreement Regarding Storm Sewer ` .17 Engineering Division Improvements and Drainage Easements with Carl Manson IV.II Recommended Action: Recommend approval of Agreement with Carl Manson regarding storm sewer improvements and drainage easements A 411 November 16, 1993 1 ss 93-0? AGREEMENT REGARDING STORM SEWER I1b PROVEMENTS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS THIS IS AN AGREEMENT MADE THIS DAY OF 1993 between City of Eden Prairie, a municipal c©rporation (the "City")and Carl Manson,an lnd•vidnal,(thy ; "Owner"). A. The Owner holds legal and equitable title to property described as; Outlot ,. except that part thereof lying Northwesterly of the following described line: = gin • �a point in the Southwesterly line of said Outlot 1, 118.62 feet-Southeasterly of the most Soul t line of Lot 1, Block 1, thence Northeasterly in a straight`line to a point on the Northeasterly line of said Outlot 1, 60 feet Southeasterly of the most Westerly corner of Lot l7, Block I, Topview Acres 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota,which property is the subject of . Agreement and is hereinafter referred to as the "Property". B. The Owner desires to develop the Property in suc ' 0 - h a manner that will requite the relocation and reconstruction of an existing municipal storm sewer line and related appurten over a portion of the above described property (all of which is hereafter referred to as the u "Improvements"). C. The City desires to obtain drainage easements over the pond and adjat at or below elevation 881.0. D. The parties hereto desire to enter into an Agreement concerning t constr tion of the Improvements and drainage easements over the Property. AGREEMENTS IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: l. The Owner and City acknowledge that the Property contains a portion of pond with a watershed of approximately 35 acres. The owner and City agree that the l year flood:, elevation of the pond_shall be 881.0. 411 , November 16, 1993 • • 2. The City agrees that the Owner may construct a single family home on the Property in accordance with the Certificate of Survey prepared by Kim A. Reaume, RLS, a copy • of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. The City agrees to reconstruct storm sewer on the Property as shown on Exhibit A. 4. The Owner agrees to pay the City $2,500 for benefit to the Property by virtue of the storm sewer to be constructed. The City may invoice the Owner upon completing storm sewer construction. The Owner shall pay the City within 30 days of date of invoice. 5. The Owner shall grant a permanent drainage and utility easement over the new storm sewer, and a drainage easement over the pond and adjacent property at or below elevation 881. The City shall survey the property to determine the area at or below elevation 881 and prepare the legal description thereof. The Owner shall not construct habitable structures or storage buildings within the drainage and utility easement for the storm sewer or the drainage easement over and adjacent to the pond. The Owner may at its sole risk install and maintain landscape materials, patio surfaces and. or privacy fences within the drainage easement over that portion of the property at or below 881. The Owner hereby releases the City, its officers, agents and employees from all liability related to flood damage to landscape materials or structures within the drainage easement 6. The City shall correct an erosion condition at the outlet of an existing storm sewer from Roberts Drive. 7. The Owner hereby consents and grants the City and its contractor the right to enter upon the Property and commence construction of the storm sewer as depicted on Exhibit A. CARL MANSON CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE A Minnesota Municipal BY: C BY: Carl Manson Douglas B. Tenpas Owner Its Mayor BY: 1111 Carl J. Jullie Its City Manager November 16, 1993 3 :Fs s« to : . Yam: -n, : STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . • The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1993, by Douglas B. Tenpas, the Mayor and Carl J. Jullie, the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this% day ,,TJ�. • 1993, by Carl Manson. r` t, ., SharoNOTARrn PUBLA.Sulllvan-AlvordIC-MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY Notary P l�C My commission expires 02 02 95 -1.-----'-' --14 November 16, 1993 4 :Zit" scummy,'farm MAW 7600 BecutiveDift Eden Prairie,MN 55344 November 8, 1993 Fax(612)937 MEMO TO: Ed en Prairie Mayor and CityCouncil . FROM: George Bentley SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Southwest Metro Transit Small Bus Purchase SUMMARY The Southwest Metro Transit Commission (SMTC) requests approval by the City tf Eden Prairie of a resolution authorizing SMTC purchase of up to 22 vehicles for use in its small bus operations. This approval is required in the SOD Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), and is being sought from all three JPA cities. The SMTC has adopted the policy decision to proceed with small bus ownership, and has approved a bidding process, subject to approval of the three cities. 4111 BACKGROUND SMTC was created through a joint powers agreement in 1960 between the cities of Chaska, Chanhassen and Eden Prairie. Transit services are provided by Star through contracts with transit service providers. Large bus service for morning and evening commutes between the SMTC service area and downtown °{ Minneapolis is provided at the present time by the MTC, and small bus peril**;_ including dial-a-ride, reverse commute, the Mall of America shuttle, and other transit service is provided at the present time by National School Hum Service, Inc. (NSB), a private provider. All transit service contracts are . competitively bid based upon regional competitive transit policies of the Regional Transit Board (RTB). Until recently, the cost of vehicle capital incurred by these transit providers was paid with operations funds. SMTC and other opt-out transit systems sought and obtained a policy from the RTB in 1992 allowing the cost of vehicle capital to be paid from regional capital bond proceeds, effective January 1, 1993. Also obtained in 1992 was $6.5 million in legislative bonding authority for use by the RTB for opt-out vehicles. The intent of this $6.5 authorization was for use in contract reimbursemmsk:; o ,,W private providers such as NSB. MTC contract reimbursement was not necessary as of January 1, 1993, since the MTC's vehicle costs were already covered by previous regional bond sales funded by a regional debt levy. 4111 Ii/J 193 SMTC Resolution Page 2' R1T DgVBIAPS .. ., SMTC has been advised by the RTB that the current pool of funds for private vehicle capital, available through bonds sold under previous statutory ` `- authority, will expire in 1994. Regional bond cder pr, "in researchirthe -' 1992 transit bonding authority, has ions mined that bonds sold under the authorityre- is for SMTC to request a language change in the statute to allow contract reimbursement of private vehicle capital fry the199�4 Legislature,, . and this option will probably be explored. However, the current flew of ' , small vehicles is aging and needs to be replaced sooner than the legislative ''' '-' ,..'•,-,,..':-----%,-.:•---.'.'„,-:--. : '''',--:•''''' option will address. Also, SMTC will benefit long-term through vehicle , , ownership by assuring quality vehicles in its mall vehicle fleet, ead bar avoiding the cost of interest on vehicles owned by private providers. x SMTC requests approval of the attached resolution authorising b"MTC to puthaee up to twenty-two t22) vehicles for use in its small bus operations. ,i1� 3 2 RESOLUTION • OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is a party to that certain Joint Powers Agreement establishing a Southwest Area Transit Commission(Joint Powers Agreement) now known as the Southwest Metro Transit Commission (SMTC) entered into July 21, 1986; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement made and entered into on the 18th day of December 1990, the Commission may not purchase any buses or motor vehicles without prior written approval of the councils of all of the parties to the Joint Powers Agreement; WHEREAS, the SMTC has determined it is necessary and advisable to purchase up to twenty-two (22) vehicles for use in the SMTC Small Bus Operation Program; WHEREAS, the purchase of the vehicles will qualify as a capital expenditure and will qualify for the expenditure of bond proceeds from the Metropolitan Council; NOW THEREFORE, Be It Resolved By The City Of Eden Prairie, that the City hereby approves the purchase of up to twenty-two (22) vehicles by the Southwest Metro Transit Commission for use in its Small Bus Operation Program. 411 ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF THIS DAY OF , 1993. Doug Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: Clerk • • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION AGENDA November 10/93. SECTION: Consent Calendar FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect's DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Parks, Recreation & Change Order Request for Boulder Walls at.Killer Natural Resources Park Playground IV. I RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a Change Order be issued to construct a boulder retaining wall to the playstructure at Miller Park. BACKGROUND: The wet conditions during construction this summer required additional rock before: paving which elevated the tunnel and the entire trail system, leaving the slopes steeper than intended. Several solutions have been discussed including, extending the toe of the slope to make the grades more gradual . This would alleviate the steep slopes, but the grades would extend into the area where the playstructures need to be placed. Installing plant materials on thesteep grades as originally planned will create a chronic maintenance problem where dirt is waaltistg down into the play equipment each time there is a heavy rain. Staff is recommending a boulder retaining wall be added to eliminate the steep slopes. Currently, a boulder retaining wall extends illalong a portion of the playstructure. Boulders were chosen as a retaining wall due to the number found within the park, the longevity of the installation and the visual appeal. The proposed :.. retaining walls will be an extension of the existing walls. The addition of the walls will alleviate the steep slopes, will solve some unforeseen circulation problems with kids scrambling up and down the steep slopes and it will provide visual continuity and give the playground a finished look. PAYMENT: Quantities for the proposed wall will be measured, and paid for, on a square foot basis. The quoted price of$12.50 a square foot is competitive with other contractors providing prices for the same work. It is estimated that the between 600 and 750 square feet of wall will be needed, totalling between $6,875 to $9,375. Payment for the wall will come from the contingency fund for Miller Park as set up originally when budgeting for the bond referendum. BPC:mdd Action/Direction: 411 NOVEMBER 16, 1993 1 ' ' 41. :- CHANGE ORDER f2 _ _,,,.: .,.„__ , . ,. , ..,,,,,,: Date. 10/29/93 To: City of Eden Prairie , _ City Improvement Contract #: BO-1 I.C. 52-25= Project Name: Miller Park Pavement & Util ties Contractors Richard Knutson, Inc. Engineer: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. Nature of Changes 1. Revision to play area to better. fit"site. 2. Additional trucking time to haul black dirt onto north berm due to rain washing material down the slope after the berm had been accepted for seeding. 3. Additional dozer time required on north berm due to rain washing material down the 'slope after the berm had been accepted for , seeding. 4. Reshape north berm, seed, mulch and place netting on area. 5. Place rock boulders on shoreline at play area to make the area more aesthetic and functionable 6. Add access boxes in concrete pads at ail drinking €ountains for future maintenance. Adjustment"to Contract Price: 1. Add labor and material costs $ 1,3$8.00 ,f " 2. Add labor and material costs $ . Z70.©0 3. Add labor and material, costs $ 3,802.50 4. Add labor and material costs $ Z7,649.00 5. Add labor and material costs $ 1,595.00 6. Add labor and material costs 10 @ $76.00 $ 760.00 • Total Increase: $35 464.50 4 f.'/i6 iq3 410 Summary of Contract Changes: Contract Amount prior to Change Order #1 : $2,564,719.20 • Net Increase resulting from Change Order #1: 7 ,871.50 Net Increase resulting from Change Order #2: 35,464.50 Current Contract Amount including Change Order #1 and #2: $2,608,055.20 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson Inc. City of Eden Prairie By / /G� By Date JO-...29-9.3 Date THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: Da e DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 11-16p93 • SECTION: Public Hearings DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development Shady Oak Ridge 4th Addition Chris Enger A Don Uram REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: , • Continue until the December 7 meeting at the request of Mr. Joe Ruzic, the proponent. BACKGROUND - PLANNING COMMIISSION ACTION: This item has been continued at the request of the Developer since the September 7 meeting. A November 16 meeting has been scheduled to resolve the outstanding issues. NOTES: • //-/e-93 DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 11-16-93 SECTION: Public Hearings DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM MIts Community Development Bream Townhomes Chris Enger 3:13 Mike Franzen REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept approval; • Approve first reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment in the RM-6.5 Zoning District; a • Resolution for Preliminary Plat approval. P` BACKGROUND - PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: f k.. This site was zoned for 45 townhouses as part of the Bearpath Planned Unit Development in July of 1993. The Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve tt project at the October 25th meeting. SUPPORTING REPORTS: 1. Staff Report dated October 22, 1993 2. Planning Commission Minutes of October 25, 1993 3. Resolutions and Ordinances41 NOTES: • ll-/6-q3 I BREAM - _ __-,-;•.__, : TO CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNF.PIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA .: . . ,. ..--...-:,-.-'-.„..--..!-.--:,-::-:':--1.--'7. '• ''.'-. ' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ''',-:.-.z--'.''_---..,,,,,--:-__._ CONCEPT OF BREAM TOWNHOUSES FOR BREAM BUILDERS WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code'provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and,.'r WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on`theBrut Townhouses PUD Cone t Bream Builders and considered their r nest-fo .p by eq cravat . : development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City C+ cil; WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on November lf,.1g93, . . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eck , Minnesota, as follows: 1. Bream Townhouses by Bream Builders, being in Hennepin County, 14B" _,, •,,,. ;ill :,,,, -. .., legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a pagrt hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in dated October 21, 1993 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commies dated October 25, 1993 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th of November , 19 . Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayo; . .., , . =--,- ATTEST: John D. Franc' City Clerk , . ._ - -_iiik- -.,,,,-.:_li.:-1 .. .,--_%„,---,. _ - - .'.: -1 . . .. . _,.. .,„_ y Nov 1 $ 19 g� �. Bream Townhomes • Exhibit A Legal Description Outlot B, Bearpath Addition according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • • BREAM TOWNHOUSES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BREAM TOWNHOUSES FOR BREAM BUILDERS BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Bream Townhouses for Bream Builders dated October 21, 1993, consisting of 6.71 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of November, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 3 OCTOBER 25, 1993 • • B. BREAM TOWNHOUSES by Bream Builders. Request for PUD Concept Review on 419 acres,PUD District Review on 6.71 acres with waivers,Zoning District Amendment in the RM-6.5 Zoning District,Preliminary Plat of 6.71 acres into 11 lots, and Site Plan Review on 6.71 acres. Location: West of Dell Road and North of Pioneer Trail. Franzen noted that the Bearpath PUD approved this site for RM-6.5 zoning and 45 townhome units. The site plan shows 29 units. • Cal Smith,Vice President of Bream Builders, distributed material about the development. Schlampp asked what the sale price will be for the units. Smith said the units will be in the $350,000 price range and they intend to offer a great deal of flexibility to the buyers. Wissner asked if they have developed similar units elsewhere. Smith said they have developed three major townhome communities in Mendota Heights and Woodbury. Kardell asked what the timing is for construction. Smith replied that they hope to start the first model sometime during December and estimated that it will be completed in three years or less. Franzen said Staff recommends approval of the project,based on plans dated October 22, 1993, subject to the Staff Report of October 22, 1993, and with the conditions that, prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and by the Watershed District, and,prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall pay the appropriate cash park fee. Kardell asked when water and sewer will be put in. Franzen replied sometime in December, optimistically, and then described the location of the sewer and water lines in the area. Schlampp asked if this is in the Riley Watershed District. Franzen said it was. Schlampp asked • how close they are from signing off on this . Franzen said they are working on the final details on the wetland mitigation for Dell Road and that they will grant a permit to do grading on the -Q=Bs PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 4 OCTOBER 25, 1993 property and another permit for the utility construction. Franzen also noted that there are areas for wetland mitigation within the entire area but not in the vicinity of Dell Road. 11111 John Bushey, 9000 Riley Lake Road, said he looked at the grading today and noticed that many areas were not fenced. Franzen said he would ask Jeff Johnson, the project engineer, about that. MOTION: Wissner moved,seconded by Bauer, to close the public hearing. Motion passed 7-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Bauer, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bream Builders for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 419 acres based on plans dated October 21, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated October 22, 1993. Motion passed 7-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Bauer, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bream Builders for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 6.71 acres based on plans dated October 21, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated October 22, 1993. Motion passed 7-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Bauer, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bream Builders for Zoning District Amendment in the RM-6.5 Zoning District based on plans dated October 21, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated October 22, 1993. Motion passed 7-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Bauer, to recommend to the City Council approval of. the request of Bream Builders for Preliminary Plat of 6.71 acres based on plans dated October 21, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated October 22, 1993. Motion passed 7-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Bauer, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bream Builders for Site Plan Review on 6.71 acres based on plans dated October 21, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated October 22, 1993. Motion passed 7-0. Schlampp noted on the Bent Creek Project that there will be substantial impact to the wetlands in this area because of the drainage that goes into it which could have been corrected with changes in the storm sewer to drain to the N.U.R.P. pond. i STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: October 22, 1993 SUBJECT: Bream Townhouses APPLICANT: Bream Builders FEE OWNER: Bearpath Limited Partnership LOCATION: West of new Dell Road and North of Pioneer Trail REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept Review on 419 acres. 2. PUD District Review on 6.71 acres with waivers for minimum lot size and setback. • 3. Zoning District Amendment in the RM-6.5 Zoning District on 6.71 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 6.71 acres into 11 lots. 5. Site Plan Review on 6.71 acres. • 1 %eV I TB 7 /tV' O .:.,wr. = CAPRICE LA. YEA'/ T.131"fr....-____ s .�5. . RICi- r ` re E -• MARSH LAKE 212 77.NECNAS CIR. L. M. H.9h`Nay o • • timilittr • I �• ... RED • z 8600 '---� -, t i - '`' �, \ t -" •v 4 S E '4_{ .•. 1 ROC _ • 43. ��t+isAif ..•HAS 11- —'2 • \ "Oi71i) -r.r.� .• • �. ' r crr • . - - '-ice. :�� < = _ -. -' _ KA�E.I'- -i-. l. 0 pN Ef H L-7 ac awn,a 12 A p U 1• y --I q 0 4t I21.uvING•4TON LA.�Q,i `lU ZR7JpF"\:� .• F j .� _ L22PRESCofT DR LJ — i 1,' I, (1� �'�e CEDAR .. Lorin ;. w�As , s ELEM p _ 1 LC1 L t - O O 'TER 9000 1 . -. _. - • -' E I , o loafielO IR M .. r�w-� _-�� .. -. / 5°, ' 0 .....--6 5— • IIZ L A ..... ....4v_ 1e4 fr—e, Q c74 '�.� I� m 16.DEVvEY COURT cp V o• v Trail ire.MC GU LRAN°'�OE / 119.DRESSER CIRCLE ' lel W al LOOP ,e. (1. ce^ R1lEY C ��,�� � /•* VAL LEr RO 12a.A1 MONO LANE J ^I 94 00 • -•' , _ -:• °• • • • • • •• • • • 1127.2iCROCYt�1S LANE ;I-,..,•4••:1it0 ."0' W \. Tile N Bream. T wnhouse 4. \ 2012w k. • • • • • • M •1 114 • •• es el I/ g i t • • • • . LAKE l.ANO UR 1 9800 . LAKELANU TER• I. l 11 I. Y O 1 2 4 i Q. W DL�4 II ,TURNBULL RD! ' a U1 1 I O. • If 1 z 1.. Z Z W il 10200 I'' F� _.�� �``� Staff Report Bream Townhouses October 22, 1993 BACKGROUND This site is currently zoned RM-6.5, multi-family. This site was approved for 45 townhomes as part of the Bearpath Planned Unit Development in July of 1993. The zoning was conditioned upon the Developer returning to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval of detailed plans including architecture, landscaping, grading, and drainage. SITE PLAN The site plan depicts the construction of 29 townhome units on 6.17 acres at a density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre. The RM-6.5 zoning district permits up to 6.7 units per acre. Access to the townhome units is by private driveway off Bearpath South. The minimum setback required between the curb and the garage is 25 feet. This will provide enough room for parking of vehicles without extending into the driveway. The site plan shows a total of 136 parking spaces. (The amount of parking required is 77 parking spaces, 58 based on 2 spaces/unit and 19 guest spaces.) • PRELIMINARY PLAT - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The project is proposed to be subdivided into 11 outlots. Outlot K will be common open space. Outlots A - J will be the location of the townhome buildings which will be subdivided after the sale of each unit by condominium law. Lots in the RM-6.5 zoning district must be 13,000 sq. ft. with 90 feet of street frontage. None of the proposed outlots for the townhome buildings meet this requirement. A Planned Unit Development waiver from the minimum requirement of 13,000 square feet and a waiver from the minimum street frontage requirement of 90 feet is required. Since the density of the project is less than the maximum allowable in the zoning district, and the purpose of clustering the townhome project was to preserve site features elsewhere within the total PUD, the request for waivers are reasonable and should be granted by the City. In addition, front, rear and sideyard setback waivers are required. The setback waivers will be from 30 feet to 0 feet for the front yard, and from 15 feet to 0 feet for the side yard, and from 20 feet to 0 feet for the rear yard. Waivers from setback requirements in townhome projects are typical and have historically been granted by the City. The request for setback waivers are reasonable based upon the low density of the project and the use of cluster housing helps preserve site features elsewhere within the PUD. • 2 NOV 'c8 9 Staff Report Bream Townhouses October 22, 1993 • GRADING There are no existing significant trees on this site. The grading plan is consistent with the grading plan approved with the Planned Unit Development Concept. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The buildings are proposed to be constructed out of primarily stucco with wood trim. These are acceptable exterior materials allowed in the RM-6.5 zoning district. The maximum building height allowed in the zoning district is 40 feet. The highest point on the building measures 38 feet. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based on 1 caliper inch for every 320 square feet of building. The caliper inch requirement is 290 inches. The total number of caliper inches proposed is 1389 inches. The caliper inches beyond the code requirement will be credited towards total tree replacement required for the Bearpath Planned Unit Development. UTILITIES - STORM WATER RUNOFF • Sewer and water will be available in Bearpath South cul-de-sac. Storm water runoff from this site will be channeled through pretreatment ponds scattered throughout the Planned Unit Development. There are 27 pretreatment ponds, pretreating storm water from the streets and the golf course before discharge into wetlands, Riley Creek, and Lake Riley. CONCLUSION The project is consistent with the PUD Concept and the zoning for townhomes. The PUD Concept approved this site for 45 townhome units. The project is 29 units. The project meets the required parking and landscaping. Sewer and water service is available. Storm water from this site will be pretreated by a NURP pond. Planned Unit Development Waivers are required for lot size, street frontage and building setback. These waivers are reasonable based on the low density of the project, and the clustering of the units in this open, relatively flat area of the site is part of the PUD density transfer to preserve wetlands and trees elsewhere on the property. 3 • -B /0 Staff Report 41111 Bream Townhouses October 22, 1993 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept, PUD District Review with waivers, zoning district amendment, site plan review, and preliminary plat based on plans dated October 22, 1993 subject to the Staff Report dated October 22, 1993 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review and approval by the Watershed District. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. • 4 DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 11.16-93 iii SECTION: Public Hearings ,,, :,,,,4 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development Bentec Addition II Chris Enger C Don Uram .+ REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: £0. The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve first reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment within the Office ., Zoning District on 1.58 acres. Q BACKGROUND - PLANNING COMtVIISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve the project at the Novembe t$" meeting. SUPPORTING REPORTS: 1. Staff Report dated November 5, 1993 2. Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes of November 8, 1993 y, f NOTES: Y EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION _' UNAPPROVED MINUTES x MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1993 7:00 PM TRAINING ROOM -"C I . ROBI T 8080 Mitchell Road ,..,,,,..,..".;4_,-,,,,.-- : _,.., , . - __ :_,.. ,,,,..:-. -_-_,-- .; F. ; • • . .,-.. -.,,'.,..,,,_'-, .,.'--:,'_ .,-.,,,',,_:_.171'''.. • IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS T A. BENTEC ADDITION II by Bentec Engineering Corporation. Request far ct Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 1.58 acres and Site Plan Review on 1.$8 acres to allow for the construction of a 1,230 square foot building expansion. Location: . 1:� Pioneer Trail. 1 • Bentec Engineering's representative, Bruce Boyd, gave the Planning Commission a presentation of the project. The business began in 1981. It was a former residence that was changed to commercial property. In 1990, small building additions were constructed on each side of the building and it was brought up to code. This proposal, stated Boyd, is to add to the front a 30' x 41' addition as well as adding 11 parking spaces and a future driveway. All 3 sides of the building will be covered by brick. Schlampp asked the proponent to locate this property. Boyd stated SuperAmerica is on the SW corner and a well drilling building and small residence are next to it. Uram stated this project meets all requirements of the Office Zoning District and Staff recommends approval. Betty Schaitberger, a homeowner at 12880 Pioneer Trail, stated that she did not object to the project, but at how the Public Hearing process was handled. On Friday, November 5th, she stated she saw trucks moving dirt and went out to look where they were coming from. That afternoon, she received a letter explaining the Planning Commission Public Hearing on the Bentec Addition II. Schaitberger stated she objects to building construction before a Public Hearing. Uram stated Boyd came in approximately 5 weeks ago with this project, stating he would like to start construction before the ground was frozen because it would be difficult for basement • excavation. After reviewing the project, Uram asked Chris Enger, Director of Community Development, his opinion on granting administrative approval to Bentec Engineering Corporation since the project was small, met City code and didn't appear to have an effect on the neighborhood. Uram explained that City code does allow the Director of Community Development the ability to grant administrative approval on small projects. The Community Development Department granted Bentec Engineering Corporation administrative approval to proceed with excavation at their own risk and a Public Hearing would still be held to give the neighborhood an opportunity to voice any concerns. Wissner asked if the Community Development Department could inform residence of excavation before a Public Hearing. Uram stated one way is for the proponent to have a neighborhood meeting. Clinton requested Uram to clarify what is a small expansion. Uram stated the Community Development Department looks at the overall project and has no specific parameters. In this case, Staff felt the project was very small and did not anticipate any problems with allowing Bentec to proceed. Sandstad asked if this is nonconforming since it is close to Highway 169. Uram stated a variance was granted in 1990 since Highway 169 took a portion of property. • 2 NOV G 1993 C, 3 • Sandstad asked to clarify the sewer system. Boyd stated it does have City sewer. Sandstad stated a drainfield is shown on the plan and should be removed if it isn't in use. Sandstad requested Boyd to show Schaitberger the view from her property. Sandstad asked Schaitberger if she has any objections, and she stated no, just the process it has went through. Charles Schaitberger, Mrs. Schaitberger's son, stated that shortly after receiving the Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice, they received a City Council Public Hearing Notice and the project was already under excavation. He felt there was a problem with the process also. Uram stated he would review with the Director of Community Development a way to improve the process when the project is a small addition and construction is necessary before climatic conditions cause a hardship to the proponent. Schlampp voiced opposition to the administrative process, stating it was handled improperly. He felt this should not be allowed to happen and the Community Development Department should have specific guidelines to clarify what can be administratively approved. Bauer stated in the future the Community Development Department should either: 1. Have a Public Hearing before excavation is allowed. 2. Grant administrative approval which allows the project to proceed without a Public Hearing. Clinton requested that Uram discuss with Enger what are the parameters of a small project when administrative approval is granted and that a presentation be made to the Planning Commission regarding this issue. MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Wissner to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION 2: Bauer moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bentec Engineering for Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 1.58 acres for construction of a building expansion, based on plans dated November 5, 1993, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 5, 1993. Motion carried 7-0. 3 • NOV 1 G 1923 -, - G �I MOTION 3: Bauer moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Bentec for Site Plan Review on 1.58 acres for construction of a building expansion, based on plans dated November 5, 1993, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 5, 1993. Motion carried 7-0. Schlampp wanted the record to show that the process was mishandled and that he was concerned that in approving the project, the Planning Commission was condoning the process. He reiterated that this was not the case and felt that the City Council should discuss this issue at their November 16 meeting. • Roy "sr- STAFF REPORT 0 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Donald R. Uram, Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development DATE: November 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Bentec Addition II APPLICANT/ Bentec Engineering Corporation FEE OWNER LOCATION: 13050 Pioneer Trail REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 1.58 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 1.58 acres. • , . . ,:i / . . . -.'— ...,....4_,...„ � V ;PROPOSED SITE } : `'':11V to ,,,.? ,X, PUB • ..-.A's- , -aa-,?...,::. _ 7i411TgdlL _ 11 p�6 . N :.'i ircHilvy_I-yi- ,,)::/11-1. -:Pia-.,__ --,...,:i i 11 . , \ f i ue. .. % 1 ' a atfe� 9S�1 yi , 3 ..;,� AREA LOCATION MAP 1 _ -Tr- C -6 Bentec Addition II November 5, 1993 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this site and sites to the east and west as Low Density Residential, with the property to the south guided Industrial. Surrounding land uses consist of the Yorkshire Point neighborhood to the east, zoned R1-13.5, Nelson Plumbing and Heating zoned I-2 to the south, Associated Well Drillers and a single family home zoned I-2 and Rural respectively to the west, with Highway 169 to the north. In 1981 the single family house located on this site was rezoned from Rural to the Office Zoning District. A preliminary plat of the property into 1 lot was approved at that time, but never final platted. In 1990, a small building addition was approved and the final plat was recorded. SITE PLAN The site consists of 1.58 acres. An addition is proposed on the front of the existing structure for a total building square footage of 7,207. This equals a Base Area Ratio of 8.5% and a Floor Area Ratio of 10.5%. Based on 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for office, 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet for manufacturing and 1 space per 2,000 square feet for warehouse, a total of 30 parking stalls are required. There are 24 parking spaces currently on the property. Because of the limited number • of employees at this company, the additional parking should be placed into proof-of-parking at this time, maintaining maximum green space. ARCHITECTURE The proposed building addition is designed to meet existing roof pitches and building height. A shingled roof and face brick will be used consistent with the existing building. LANDSCAPING Based on the total building square footage, 8 caliper inches of plant material is required. A total of 20 caliper inches are being provided to aid in the screening of the parking lot area from the neighboring residential uses. LIGHTING No additional site lighting has been identified as part of this submittal. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Zoning District Amendment and Site Plan Review within the Office District on 1.58 acres. BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP. 13050 PIONEER TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-4113 TELEPHONE 612-944-7000 October 13, 1993 FAX 612-944-9514 • Donald R. Uram AICP, Assistant Planner City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Uram, As per our discussion, Bentec Engineering Corporation respectfully requests administrative approval of the following action: As Bentec Engineering has begun the development review process and has submitted the appropriate requested documentation; As this project is scheduled to be presented before the Planning Commission and City Council, November 8 and November 22, 1993, respectively; As the development and site plan fees have been paid; As the Bentec Engineering proposal is a relatively uncomplicated addition to the existing facility; As the representatives and owner of Bentec Engineering are aware of the • responsibilities to the City of Eden Prairie; And, as the weather is becoming increasingly tenuous to begin a construction project; Bentec Engineering Corporation and its representatives respectfully request the approval by City Administration to begin construction of the foundation and basement level of the proposed new addition. We understand and agree that Bentec Engineering would begin this construction at its own risk, and completion of this project would depend upon final approval by the Eden Prairie Planning Commission and City Council. It is our desire and intention to complete the development review process as scheduled. Respectfully submitted, Bruce Boyd Comptroller Bentec Engineering Corporation BB/cr 4011, Tr- C. • BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP. 13050 PIONEER TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-4113 TELEPHONE 612-944-7000 FAX 612-944-9514 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROPOSAL FOR FACILITY ADDITION OCTOBER 12, 1993 Bentec Engineering Corporation, located at 13050 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, 55347, formally submits to the City of Eden Prairie plans to add on to the existing facility. This proposal consists of an addition to the south end of the facility. The new structure will have the outside dimensions of 30 feet by 41 feet, with one level below ground and one level above ground. The existing exterior wall at the location of the addition shall be removed and an entrance will be created on the lower level which will connect with the existing building. This addition shall extend into the existing parking lot, with the loss of four parking stalls. The enclosed site plan show proof of parking for the replacement and additional parking stalls. The exterior of the building will have matching brick to the current facility on all • three sides. The basement level of this new addition shall be utilized strictly for storage. The main level shall be equally divided between assembly area and office space. The new addition shall bring the total square footage to 7,207, with the following breakdown: Office and Common Area 4,698 .2+ Assembly 1,168 `+ Storage/Warehouse 1,341 aZ-- Bentec Engineering has been located at this complex since 1981. We currently have a staff of 21 employees at this location, 17 full time and 4 part time. Our current situation and future plans have indicated the requirement of additional storage space and assembly area, as well as adjustment in our office space. We respectfully submit these plans for your review and approval. 1 BENTEC ENGINEERING PROPOSAL • SECTION A PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The tentative construction schedule for this addition is as follows: We would request that the lower level basement would be constructed prior to the final approval process through the middle of November. The above ground construction would continue after final approval, and be completed approximately at the end of the 1993 calendar year. The exterior brick work would be completed in the spring of 1994 after the snow melts. LANDSCAPING Additional trees would be planted along the eastern portion of the property to screen the residences from the building and parking lot. Several trees would also be planted along the back portion of the building which runs along Hwy. 169. Our plans also include transplanting various trees which will be removed for the additional parking. • NOV11111 16 1993 _ C. I O EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BENTEC ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1.58 ACRES S S MY 1 8 /41 - VI • • NOVEMBER 16,1993 . , 16331 AT & T SERVICE ' f 16332 AT & T SERVICE ? 6333 MICHELLE BARNETT REFUND—STEP AEROBICS CLASS 6334 MARY ANNE BRYNDAL REFUND—DIVING LESSONS 16335 NANCY EVENSEN REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS " t 4 16336 PAULA GLEASON REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS li ' 16337 FRED HAAS REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS -'406: 16338 MAUREEN HENDERSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 1 .`$,,$ 16339 'HOPKINS POSTOFFICE POSTAGE-SR NEWSLETTER 158 1 , 16340 ANNE GUTTMAN REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS 16341 JASON—NORTHCO LP #1 NOVEMBER 93 RENT-LIQUOR STORE #1 5' 2.1 16342 ROBIN JOHNSON REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS ! 4 ` 16343 BOB KAITZ TRAINING MANUAL-YOUTH ATHLETICS 14..0`: 16344 DAVID KELLY REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS 5.„043' 16345 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 78944* 16346 NSP SERVICE 3734L 16347 OLD LOG THEATRE ADULT OUTING—FEES PD 8440 16348 SHERRY OLECKI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 4 e,'. 16349 KIMBERLY PEARSON REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS , #' 16350 MARY PEDERSEN REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS 32,: '#' 16351 POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT 1000.00 16352 JOHN RANDLE GUEST SPEAKER FOR EDEN PRAIRIE ATHLETIC 450.00 ASSN APPRECIATION DINNER 16353 ANNE ROLLWAGEN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 43.0 . 16354 ROMP N ROLL SPECIAL EVENT/FEES PD 155 13E' 16355 DICK SIMMONS REFUND—RENTAL OF OUTDOOR CENTER - IQ1 F 16356 TANJYA THOMAS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 21.00 16357 KEITH TRIPLETT REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS IS AC 4111k6358 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 109 .C' 6359 MONICA WAGNER REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS 21.*. 16360 ANNETTE WEBER REFUND—SWIMMING LESSONS 21.0 16361 WELSH COMPANIES INC NOVEMBER 93 RENT—LIQUOR STORE #3 - 4 16362 KAREN WILLEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS ILO 16363 DEBBIE ZILKA REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RENTAL 503 =i 16364 NADIA ZOMORODIAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15�. 16365 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC FILTERS—POOL MAINTENANCE—COMMUNITY' CEN' i 55.1f 16366 BOB OLSON SCHOOL EXPENSES—POLICE DEPT 1,1 . 16367 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ BALLISTIC VEST OUTERSHELLS/AMMUNITIONNfl8.7<," SCRUBBER/CLEANING ROD/BORE BRUSH—POLICE A 1 DEPT 16368 MCPOA CONFERENCE—POLICE DEPT .At ' 16369 CARD SERVICES MEETING EXPENSES—ADMINISTRATION DEPT 16 , 16370 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL CONFERENCE—HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT ' 96,04' 16371 CUSTOM BUILDING CONCEPTS REFUND—OVERPAYMENT OF BUILDING PERMIT , 1077.1.` 16372 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC NOVEMBER 93 RENT—LIQUOR STORE 5100151.,, 16373 VIOLET LAPPIN REFUND—SENIOR LINE DANCING CLASS 20.01 16374 ARDIS MCCARTHY REFUND—DESIGN YOUR OWN CARDS CLASS (.SE 16375 MARTHA ZWEBER REFUND—EXERCISE CLASS 32.O 16376 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 10-29-93 75936.2 16377 TIM KOST REFUND—SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0•` 16378 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE CONFERENCE—EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ". 8t1.0 16379 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE—ENGINEERING DEPT/STREET MAINT! `-- 516.0 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE S6380 MNAPA CONFERENCE—ADMINISTRATION DEPT 30,0 6381 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY COPY PAPER—CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT 585.2. 14570963 11-16-93 VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16382 DELEGARD TOOL CO LOCKING PLIERS/CUTTERS/CORDLESS DRILL/ 622.54 WRENCH SET/SWITCHES/DRILL DRIVER VACUUM BAGS/DISC-EQUIPMENT MAINT/STREET DEPT 6383 FEIST BLANCHARD CO BEARINGS/HUB CAPS/HARNESSES/CABLES/PLUG 529.29 FILLER/CABLE CLAMPS/OIL SEALS/BRAKE SHOES/ FRICTION PADS/THREADED RODS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 16384 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY TARPS/SPRAY PAINT/DISTRIBUTOR CAPS/ROTORS/ 3476.32 BRACKETS/TAIL LIGHTS/CONNECTORS/BELTS/ EXHAUST PIPES/MAGNET/CABLES/TUBING/FUEL PUMP/SPLASH GUARDS,BEARINGS/SILICONE/ FILTERS/LENSES/CLAMPS/ALTERNATORS/SENDER/ WIRE/FITTINGS/SWITCHES/DRILL BITS/WATER PUMP/IGNITION COILS/THERMOSTATS/POWER STEERING PUMP/PLUGS/HOSE ENDS/HORN/CAR WAX-STREET MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/ UTILITIES DIVISION 16385 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 133.37 16386 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN DUES-WATER DEPT 160.00 16387 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 10-29-93 SAVINGS BONDS 500.00 16388 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-29-93 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 225.69 16389 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 10-29-93 32.00 16390 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 10-29-93 3639.46 16391 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC NOVEMBER 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 19637.9C 16392 MEDICA CHOICE NOVEMBER 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 46121.81 16393 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-29-93 200.00 16394 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-29-93 25.00 16395 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 10-15-93 & 10-29-93 1200.0C 16396 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 10-29-93 36963.9C 016397 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 10-29-93 206.0C 6398 KIM BRATTENSBORG REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 24.00 16399 MARY BROEKEMEIER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.0( 16400 DEBRA CROOKS REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS 22.0( 16401 JILL CROSBY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 21.0( 16402 DEBRA ERICKSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.0( 16403 SHEILA JENNE REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS 22.0( 16404 MARY KATTNER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.0( 16405 LAURA KLINGSHEIM REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.0( 16406 JILL LAFFRENZEN REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS 22.0( 16407 PATRICIA MAHONEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 30.0( 16408 RICHARD MARZINSKE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.0( 16409 TERRI MATA REFUND-GYMNASTICS LESSONS 21.0( 16410 MARY NELSON REFUND-STANDARD FIRST AID CLASS 21.0( 16411 DENISE NORRIS REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS CLASS 21.0( 16412 JANICE RAGAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.01 16413 PEGGY RILEY REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS 21.0' 16414 TORREY ROLLWAGEN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.G 16415 MICHELLE SCHMIDT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.0 16416 KATY THIELKE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 33.0 16417 SUE UNDESTAD REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 18.6 16418 PAT ZOERB REFUND-KIDS KORNER CLASS 59.0 16419 KAYUAN ZOMORODIAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 21.0 16420 UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA CONFERENCE-RECREATION AOIgINISTRATIOG1 DEPT 410.0 16421 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 256.0 Allk16422 SANDY HILLIKER REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RENTAL 50.0 6423 CLARK KUBE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 35.0 11490695 11-16-93 2. • VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16424 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSN PUBLICATIONS-FINANCE DEPT 89.0C 16425 JOANNE HELTZEL PUBLICATION-FORESTRY DEPT 3.75 .16426 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 63.1C 16427 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSES-CITY STAFF 135.0C 16428 MINNESOTA UC FUND 3RD QTR 93 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 1950.18 16429 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP MIX 96.10 16430 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 10561.6E 16431 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER - 15901.99 16432 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 88.40 16433 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 9546.25 16434 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 384.2C 16435 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 158.67 16436 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 14800.15 16437 LORAINE BEINHOFF REFUND-LUNCHEON AND PLAY-SENIOR PROGRAMS 5.0C 16438 JEANNE KAUTH REFUND-LUNCHEON & PLAY-SENIOR PROGRAMS 8.00 16439 ALLENE & KENNETH HOOKOM REFUND-RIVERBOAT REVENGE TRIP 75.5C 16440 VIOLET LAPPIN REFUND-RIVERBOAT REVENGE TRIP 37.75 16441 ARDIS & ROBERT MCCARTHY REFUND-RIVERBOAT REVENGE TRIP 75.5C 16442 EDNA WALKER REFUND-OLD LOG THEATRE TRIP 16.5C 16443 TARGET CENTER TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 338.00 16444 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 1206.51 16445 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 25513.41 16446 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 958.6C 16447 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR & WINE 19377.3E 16448 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR & WINE 26785.51 16449 PRIOR WINE CO LIQUOR & WINE 4901.15 16450 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR & WINE 11520.41 .16451 ASPHALT SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP SERVICE-1993 BITUMINOUS SEALCOATING- 15016.4E STREET MAINTENANCE 16452 S M HENTGES & SONS INC SERVICE-ROWLAND ROAD 58427.2r 16453 RICHARD KNUTSON INC SERVICE-BRAXTON DR STREET & UTILITY 419906.0E IMPROVEMENTS/CEDAR RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION/MILLER PARK PAVEMENTS/UTILITIES & APPURTENANCES 16454 METRO UTILITIES INC SERVICE-SINGLETREE LN TRUNK WATERMAIN _ 72057.5( IMPROVEMENTS 16455 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-BLUFFS E 12TH ADDITION/VILLA.GE 162315.8f KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION 16456 RYAN CONTRACTING SERVICE-RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS 31125.4: 16457 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER TRENCHER RENTAL-STREET MAINT/AUGER. RENTAL-- PARK MAINT/LAWN EDGER RENTAL-POLICE BLDG 16458 AAA STRIPING SERVICE CO CROSSWALK STRIPING/STREET STRIPING-STREET 3308.8, DEPT 16459 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS ANNUAL WATER RESERVOIR LEVEL ALARM SYSTEM 347.6, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-WATER DEPT 16460 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO UNIFORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER/TOWELS & MATS- 218.5 LIQUOR STORES 16461 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC PUBLICATIONS-'LATER DEPT 215.0 16462 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC SIGN POST & CLAMPS/SHEAR PINS & NUTS/ 892.0. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS-STREET DEPT/HATER DEPT 16463 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING DISPOSAL OF WILDLIFE-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 133.1 16464 ANIMAL & BOARDING KENNEL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 33.4 Al116465 AQUA ENGINEERING INC PLUMBING SEALER/PVC PRIMERP?.RK MAINT 25.1 6466 ARMOR SECURITY INC PADLOCKS-FACILITIES DEPT/LOCK PARTS & 188.3 REPAIR/REKEYED CYLINDERS-ROUND LAKE PARK 90944704 11-16-93 3. VI 16467 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS WATER LEAK REPAIR/PRESSURE GAUGE-PARK 169.5C MAI NTENANCE 16468 ATOM DUES-POLICE DEPT 20.00 16469 AUSTIN HARDWARE INC STAINLESS STEEL HINGES FOR LIME SILO 173.5E DOORS-WATER DEPT 16470 AUDIOVISUAL INC PARTIAL PAYMENT-AUDIO/VISUAL/CABLE CAST 26486.5C SYSTEM-E P CITY CENTER 16471 AVR INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE 102.74 16472 B & S TOOLS WRENCH SET/IMPACT TOOL/SOCKET SETS/CHISEL/ 624.6E WIRE BRUSHES/PROTECTIVE BOOTS/PLIERS/PRY BARS/SAFETY GLASSES/SCREWDRIVER/BLO GUN/ RATCHET WRENCHES-EQUIPMENT MAINT/UTILITIES DIVISION 16473 BACONS ELECTRIC CO FUSES-WATER DEPT 63.2E 16474 PATRICIA BARKER EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 55.4C 16475 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-EVALUATION & RANKING OF FOREST 10269.9C TRACTS-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 16476 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC SPARK PLUGS/BATTERIES/WINDSHIELD SOLVENT! 353.0E SNOW PLOW LIGHTS/SIGNAL LIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16477 DAVID BLACK MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADMINISTRATION 20.2E 16478 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER PLAN UPDATE 457.1 16479 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COST-SHARING FOR WASTE REDUCTION AD-SOLID 98.5f WASTE MANAGEMENT 16480 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO HALLOWEEN CANDY-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 414.5( 16481 BOYD OIL DISTRIBUTING OIL ANALYSIS KIT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 53.2E 16482 LES BRIDGER REPLACED DAMAGED GLASSES-POLICE DEPT 149.0( 16483 BROCK WHITE GALVANIZED TUBES-FACILITIES DEPT 242.6( 16484 MAXINE BRUECK SURGE PROTECTOR STRIP/OFFICE SUPPLIES- 280.3f FINANCE DEPT 16485 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC NOVEMBER 93 WASTE DISPOSAL-LIQUOR STORE 84.9C_ 16486 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 300.0( 16487 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/REPLACED PAGER TONE 2210.0: REEDS/ADJUSTED SPEAKERS/REPLACED ANTENNA CONNECTOR/INSTALLED SPEAKER CONTACT CUSHIONS-POLICE DEPT - 16488 FRANK R CARDARELLE SERVICE-LOCATED STORM SEWER EASEMENT- 375.0( STARING LAKE PARK 16489 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET MAINTENANCE 6824.11 16490 JIM CARLSON LEASING CO PASSENGER VAN RENTAL-ACCESSIBILITY PROCRAM 171.2 16491 CENTRAIRE INC COMPRESSOR REPAIR/CHEMICAL TREATMENT FOR 226.5' COOLING TOWER-POLICE BUILDING 16492 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS BAR OIL-PARK MAINTENANCE 31.& 16493 CITY OF CHASKA GOLF COURSE RENTAL-SUMMER SKILL 459.0' DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 16494 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC GEAR LUBRICANT/OIL-WATER DEPT 361.8 16495 CLEAN SWEEP INC SERVICE-PARKING LOTS & WALK WAYS STRIPING- 487.5 PARK MAINTENANCE 16496 A COMMERICAL CLEANING CO INC CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORE 170.4 16497 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT CO AIR COMPRESSOR RENTAL-FIRE DEPT 372.7 16498 CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING MICROFILMING-UTILITIES DIVISION 883.1 16499 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY BELTS/DRIVERS LEATHER GLOVES- Z020.7 SAFETY DEPT/U►TILITIES DIVISION 16500 CRYSTEEL DIST INC LIGHT BAR MOUNTING KIT-EQUIPMENT MAINT 144.3 4111 5415794 11-16-93 4. VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16501 CUB FOODS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 208.28 16502 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 10196.56 16503 DALCO PAPER TOWELS-WATER DEPT 169.03 016504 DATAAGE SOLUTIONS TRAINING VIDEOS-FIRE DEPT 250.00 16505 EUGENE DIETZ OCTOBER 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 200.00 16506 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS INC ANNUAL AERIAL LIFT SAFETY INSPECTION- 653.85 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16507 DONS SOD SERVICE SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE 537.88 16508 DORADUS CORPORATION 4TH QTR 93 WARNING SIREN MAINTENANCE 792.00 AGREEMENT-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT 16509 DPC INDUSTRIES INC FERRIC SULFATE-WATER DEPT 4538.52 16510 DUO-SAFETY LADDER CORP HEAT SENSOR LABELS-FIRE DEPT 25.00 16511 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-EQUIPMENT MAINT/SUMMER SKILL 88.51 DEVELOPMENT/SPECIAL TRIPS/ACTIVITY CAMP! BEACH CONCESSIONS/SENIOR PROGRAMS/ADAPTIVE RECREATION/COMMUNITY CENTER CONCESSIONS 16512 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 142.91 16513 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-SPORTS CAMP/ACTIVITY CAMP! 164.6S COMMUNITY CENTER CONCESSIONS 16514 DYNA SYSTEMS LOCKNUT ASSORTMENTS/REPAIR INSERT-WATER 375.5S DEPT 16515 E-COM INC LAGOON VALVE COVERS-WATER DEPT 150.00 16516 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD LATCH/CONTROLS/WHEELS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 822.9( 16517 CITY OF EDINA OCTOBER 93 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 220.0C 16518 EDINA S W PLUMBING FIXED FAUCET LEAK/INSTALLED NEW UNION- 140.00 LIQUOR STORE 16519 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 EXPENSES-UNITED WAY LUNCHEON-COMMUNITY 44.5E SERVICES DEPT 16520 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE WORDPERFECT SOFTWARE-PARK & RECREATION 1171.5: DEPT/PROGRAM SUPERVISOR/COMMUNITY CENTER/ ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 16521 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES FAN MOTORS-WATER DEPT 204.51 16522 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC COVERALLS/CART/HIP BOOTS/RUBBER KNEE 643.9( BOOTS/HYDROGEN SULFIDE SENSOR-UTILITIES DIVISION 16523 ENVIRO-CON MULCH & DISC ANCHOR-PIONEER PARK 422.0f IMPROVEMENTS 16524 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 199.3' 16525 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 973.8! 16526 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES CHAIN LINK FENCE AT TOPVIEW LIFT STATION/ 12111.9' TENNIS COURTS COLOR COATING-PARK MAINT 16527 FIRE DEPT SAFETY OFFICERS ASSN DUES-FIRE DEPT 60.01 16528 FLEET MECHANICAL SERVICES REFINISH & PAINT VEHICLE DOOR/SANDBLASTED 366.0; PLOW-EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER DEPT 16529 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY SLIPPER GUIDE HOSE WITH EYE & ROPE/JETTER 491.8: HOSE COUPLINGS/SWAGE TOOL-SEWER DEPT 16530 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 30.2 16531 FRANKLIN QUEST OFFICE SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 20.7 16532 FRESHWATER HARVESTING SERVICE-BOG MOBILIZATION & REMOVAL-RED 6140.0 ROCK LAKE 16533 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS/TOWELS/MATS-STREET MAINT/ 916.4 EQUIPMENT MAINT/PARK MAINT/UTILITIES DIV 16534 G T LAWN SERVICE SEPTEMBER 93 MOWING SERVICE-PARK MAINT/ 1165.0 PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY 016535 GENESIS COMPUTERS INC PRINTHEAD-POLICE DEPT 100.0 4473780 11-16-93 5. VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16536 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD SPRING WATER-LIQUOR STORE 28.49 16537 GNERER WELDING INC SNOW PLOW FRAME-UTILITIES DIVISION 157.30 6538 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SEPTEMBER 93 SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 191.25 16539 GOLD ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-DRAFT POLICY MANUAL FOR FIRE DEPT 1737.50 16540 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SVC TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 69.65 16541 W W GRAINGER INC STENCIL SETS/RECLOSEABLE BAGS/SHIPPING 682.14 TAGS/CAUTION TAGS/SPRAY TIP FILTERS/MOTOR/ CHEMICAL GOGGLES/CALCULATOR AUTO DIALER/ TOGGLE SWITCHES/MOTOR STARTER/PHOTOCONTROL/ HEATER ELEMENT-EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER DEPT 16542 GRANOTE ORNAMENTAL IRON INC ORAMENTAL HAND RAILING-SENIOR CENTER 1800.00 16543 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-MILLER PARK 1275.00 16544 BRYAN HANSON EXPENSES-SUNBONNET DAY-HISTORICAL & 50.00 CULTURAL COMMISSION 16545 HEAVENLY HAM MEETING EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 22.00 16546 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 28.00 nrPT 16547 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER BLOOD TESTS-POLICE DEPT 11.50 16548 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF SEPTEMBER 93 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 930.36 16549 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEES-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 706.25 16550 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTAGE-VOTER REGISTRATION VERIFICATIONS 73.6C 16551 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SEPTEMBER 93 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE 3304.00 DEPT 16552 D C HEY COMPANY INC COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT 54.34 16553 HONEYWELL INC NOVEMBER 93 INDUSTRIAL MAINT AGREEMENT- 1200.00 WATER DEPT 16554 HONSA LIGHTING LIGHT BULBS-LIQUOR STORE 39.4E 16555 INLAND TRUCK PARTS CO U-JOINT KITS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 152.00 �6556 INSTY-PRINTS PRINTING FORMS-POLICE DEPT 233.3C 16557 ISFSI DUES-FIRE DEPT 60.0( 16558 INTERSTATE BEARING SILICONE/BRACKETS-WATER DEPT 84.5z 16559 LYNNETTE ISAACS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 48.0( 16560 RANDY IVERSON REFUND-DEVELOPERS DEPOSIT AGREEMENT 102.1E 16561 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATORS/RADIATOR RECORED-EQUIPMENT MAINT 344.7: 16562 THE JAMIESON COMPANY VOLY SCORE EQUIPMENT WITH STRAPS- 168.3: ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT 16563 J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC FLEET SAFETY COMPLIANCE SERVICE-SAFETY 218.0: DEPT 16564 KOKESH ATHLETIC SUPPLIES INC SOFTBALLS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT 60.4, 16565 JILL KUYAVA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 128.O( 16566 L 0 F T CLASSICS T-SHIRTS/SWEATSHIRTS/POLO SHIRTS- 1420.2( • AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/TENNIS PROGRAM/ ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT 16567 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY FLASHLIGHT/HAND LAMPS/STORAGE CASES/ 1111.9 BATTERY BELT PACK & CHARGER/LOCKING STEEL SNAP RINGS/POWER CONVERTER/LATEX GLOVES! CONVERSION DOLLIES-WATER DEPT 16568 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR INSTALLED DOOR WEATHERSTRIPPING-FIRE 554.3 STATION,BUSHINGS/SEAL KIT/CLUTCH ASSEMBLY/ BOTTOM CAPS/DOOR REPAIR-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 16569 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1736.1 16570 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC MUD FLAPS/WIRING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 192.2 16571 SUZANNE K LANE MILEAGE/EXPENSES-ELECTIONS DEPT!FINANCE 28.7 DEPT 16572 CINDY LANENBERG MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT 56.0 1906006 11-16-93 6. VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16573 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD SEPTEMBER 93 LEGAL SERVICE-INTERSTATE 26702.83 DIESEL LITIGATION .6574 LANO EQUIPMENT INC DIGGER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 53.25 16575 LAS SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT CUSTOM BUILT TOP COVER/TAIL GATE/LOAD 605.99 GATE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16576 C E LASALLE & ASSOCIATES APPRAISAL SERVICE-ROWLAND ROAD 9087.50 16577 L MCI T 3RD QTR 93 LIABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM 52955.25 16578 L MCI T 3RD QTR 93 WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUM 56491.50 16579 LEEF BROS INC COVERALLS/TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 147.25 16580 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC SEPTEMBER 93 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 3976.45 16581 LEIER MAINTENANCE SERVICE INSTALLED DRAIN TILE SYSTEM-STORM DRAINAGE 1137.42 PROGRAM 16582 LIQUID CARBONIC LIQUID CARBON DIOXIDE-WATER DEPT 490.10 16583 LOGIS SEPTEMBER 93 SERVICE 8582.10 16584 M-V THERMOGAS CO-CHASKA PROPANE CYLINDERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 26.63 16585 MA MA DS REFUND-OVERPAYMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSE 100.00 16586 MAACO AUTO PAINTING & BODYWORKS C REFINISH & PAINT VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 520.73 16587 JAMES MACHEN REFUND-OVERPAYMENT OF UTILITY BILLING 97.70 16588 W P & R S MARS CO DRILL BITS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 372.59 16589 GEORGE MARSHALL WEED MOWING SERVICE-CRESTWOOD PARK 200.00 16590 MASYS CORPORATION OCTOBER 93 COMPUTER HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 1917.22 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/SOFTWARE UPGRADE- POLICE DEPT 16591 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING-CRIME VICTIM CARDS-POLICE DEPT 238.5E 16592 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 18.00 16593 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR CTR 81.67 16594 MCNEILUS STEEL INC STEEL PLATE-COMMUNITY CENTER 67.61 16595 JULIE MEINZER CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 20.00 111116596 MENARDS NAILS/JOIST SUPPORTS/DOWNSPOUT/GUTTERS & 114.6E HOOKS/TREATED TIMBERS/ROOFING PAPER/TARP- PARK MAINTENANCE DEPT/WATER DEPT 16597 MENDOTA MEDICAL INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 402.6: 16598 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC TRACT SEARCH-HOUSE REHABILITATION PROGRAM 40.0( 16599 METRO PAPER RECOVERY INC 3RD QTR 93 RECYCLING CONTAINER SERVICE- 135.0( CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 16600 METRO SALES INC TONER/INK FILM/2 COPIER MAINTENANCE 3366.6- AGREEMENTS-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 16601 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM DECEMBER 93 SEWER SERVICE 149813.0i 16602 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO SHEET METAL/BUMPER HITCH MOUNTED ON TRUCK- 838.3` EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE 16603 MIDWEST AQUACARE SERVICE-EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL INSPECTION- 2300.O( PARK DEPT 16604 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT 2905.7' 16605 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC TRACTOR TRANSMISSION REPAIR/BEARINGS/ 1896.2 WASHERS/BUSHINGS/CLUTCH/GASKETS/CLAMPS/ SEAL/IMPELLAR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16606 MINNCOMM PAGING NOVEMBER 93 PAGER SERVICE-UTILITIES DIV 44.4 16607 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSN OF REALTORS DUES-ASSESSING DEPT 91.0 16608 MINNEAPOLIS EQUIPMENT COMPANY SPRING-WATER DEPT 14.4 16609 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 901.6 16610 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY LABELS/O-RING-FIRE DEPT 9.5 16611 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CITYS SHARE EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL 4524.0 TREATMENT FOR BRYANT LAKE 41,6612 MN HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ADDITONAL 1ST TIME BUYER PROGRAM 20.0 PROCESSING FEE-COIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 33130767 11-16-93 7. VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16613 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL INC CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 290.00 16614 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPLACED INJECTOR & OIL PRESSURE SENDING 2143.08 S UNIT/ENGINE REPAIR/ELEMENT/NOZZLES/OIL FILTERS/OIL PRESS SWITCH/OIL/GREASE/FUEL- EQUIPMENT MAINT/BLADE-PARK MAINT/FLOW GAUGES-WATER DEPT 16615 MUNICILITE CO LENSES/REFLECTORS/BULBS/CONNECTORS/COAXIAL 916.9E CABLE/HALOGEN LIGHT FLANGE MOUNTS/BEACON LIGHT-EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 16616 JAN NELSON MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 100.00 16617 NORDIC TRUCK PARTS INC STROBE HEADS & PACKS/PINS/CONNECTORS- 444.8E EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 16618 NORTH CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY WATER SEAL PAINT-WATER DEPT 1081.01 16619 NORTH COAST MEDICAL INC WRITING GRIPS-SAFETY DEPT 30.2C 16620 NORTH STAR ICE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 579.8� 16621 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY VALVE BOX RAINSTOPPERS-WATER DEPT 52.5C 16622 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT 208.8 16623 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS PRINTER REPAIRS/TYPEWRITER REPAIR/MONITOR 542.K REPAIR-FINANCE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER/ UTILITIES DIVISION 16624 PAPER WAREHOUSE RIBBON-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 3.2( 16625 PARK & PLAZA PRODUCTS INC CYCLOOPS BIKE RACKS-COMMUNITY CENTER 2108.7( FRONT ENTRY 16626 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY SEATS REUPHOLSTERED-FIRE DEPT 180.0C 16627 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC HYDRAULIC COUPLINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 417.12 16628 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR 19496.0( WELTERS PURGATORY ACRES 16629 PLYMOUTH SUPPLY COMPANY PADLOCK-PARK MAINTENANCE 62.14 411116630 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING FORMS/ENVELOPES-ELECTIONS DEPT/ 1158.0r. ASSESSING DEPT/POLICE DEPT 16631 J A PRICE AGENCY INC REIMBURSEMENT-SEWER BACKUP DAMAGE 250.0( 16632 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC EQUIPMENT REPAIR-SEWER DEPT 372.5, 16633 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC OCTOBER 93 WASTE DISPOSAL-FACILITIES DEPT/ 1323.4 COMMUNITY CTR/LIQUOR STORE/WATER DEPT 16634 QUINLAN PUBLISHING CO INC SUBSCRIPTION-PLANNING DEPT 79.8: 16635 RAINBOW FOODS EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL/OUTDOOR CENTER - 65.1: 16636 RITZ CAMERA FILM/FILM PROCESSING/BATTERIES-PARK 41.8: PLANNING/FORESTRY DEPT 16637 ROLLINS OIL CO UNLEADED FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7302.T 16638 ROTO-ROOTER SEWER SERVICE FOR 8296 RED ROCK ROAD 125.0( 16639 JOHN RUSSO REFUND-ICE RENTAL FEE 106.5( 16640 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS RUBBER STAMP-FACILITIES DEPT 10.6: 16641 SAINT FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CT FIRST RESPONDER CLASSES-FIRE DEPT 2660.0, 16642 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ 127.3 FIRE DEPT/STREET MAINT/ADAPTIVE RECREATION/ RECREATION ADMINISTRATION/COMMUNITY CENTER 16643 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC BALLOON STRING & CLIPS/BALLOONS-SOCIAL 67.9 PROGRAMS 16644 SANCO INC VACUUM CLEANER/BAG ASSEMBLY-FACILITIES DEPT 1576.6 16645 CHUCK SCHAITBERGER MILEAGE/FILM/CAMERA PART-FIRE DEPT 108.1 16646 PHIL SCHARMANN CARPET CLEANING SERVICE-LIQUOR STORES 320.0 16647 WILBUR W SCHULTZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1138.5 16648 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 73.4 .16649 DOUGLAS SIMPSON REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 29.7 4559498 11-16-93 8. VI • NOVEMBER 16,1993 16650 STEVEN R SINELL CONFERENCE/EXPENSES/OCTOBER 93 CAR 501.40 ALLOWANCE-ASSESSING DEPT 016651 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER LETTERHEAD-SAFETY DEPT 70.29 16652 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATORIES COMPHOTOFIT LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL- 480.00 POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 16653 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC EXPENSES-CITY HALL 239.52 16654 ERIC SIT KARATE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 964.40 16655 MARLENE SMITH CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM 229.6e 16656 PETER N SMITH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 247.5C 16657 W GORDON SMITH CO PROPANE/OIL-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 30.02 16658 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION BUTANE/TAPE/WIRE CRIMPER-EQUIPMENT MAINT 58.1C 16659 SPECIALTY CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-CONSTRUCTION OF BIKE TRAIL ALONG 7863.37 COUNTY RD 4 FROM VALLEY VIEW RD TO DUCK LK TRAIL/WATER MAIN REPAIR-WEST 78TH ST & PRAIRIE CTR DR-WATER DEPT 16660 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/WATER DEPT/2 2835.2E FILING CABINETS-$501/3 CHAIRS-$740-WATER DEPT 16661 STAHL CONSTRUCTION REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 288.3C 16662 STARS RESTAURANT REFUND-OVERPAYMENT LIQUOR LICENSE 200.00 16663 STAT-MEDICAL INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 60.a 16664 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ BALLISTIC VEST OUTERSHELL-POLICE DEPT/ 207.0` GRILLE/DECK LIGHT-WATER DEPT 16665 SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION ENGINE ANALYZER UPDATE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 1127.5t 16666 TNEMEC CORPORATION INC PAINT-WATER DEPT 6666.9E 16667 TOLL COMPANY HELIUM-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 79.1: 16668 TRI-CO TREE MOVERS TREES FOR LAGOON & WELL SCREENING-WATER 3578.4( DEPT S16669 E JOHN TROMBLEY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 49.5( 16670 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN/ACETYLENE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 199.3: 16671 U S CAVALRY JACKET-PARK RANGER 59.1( 16672 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 923.9: 16673 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BADGES-POLICE DEPT 55.3E 16674 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 175.5: 16675 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 390.2' 16676 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC DRILL BITS/WASHERS/FITTINGS-EQUIPMENT - 242.0: MAINTENANCE 16677 VICTORIA REPAIR & MFG GATE-WATER DEPT 125.01 16678 TRIA VIKESLAND PUMPKINS/MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 108.4: PROGRAM 16679 WAL-MART STORES INC POLAROID CAMERA & FILM-POLICE DEPT 587.6: 16680 WATERPRO CORRUGATED PERFORATED TUBES/PVC PIPE/ 23566.3 COUPLINGS/END PLUGS/TEES/WYES-STORM DR.PINAGE PROGRAM/OIL/VALVE BOX CUSHION/ WATER METER READING INTERROGATORS & RACKS-$17850/SEALS/5/8X3/4 INCH 1000 GAL METERS/BUSHINGS/15 WATER METER REGISTERS- $1950-WATER DEPT/PAILS-SEWER DEPT 16681 RON WAY GOLF INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 92.4 16682 WICKENHAUSER EXCAVATING INC BACKHOE & OPERATOR FOR BOG REMOVAL AT 12054.3 RED ROCK LAKE 16683 VOID OUT CHECK 0.0 16684 WRIGHT LINE INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE DEPT 263.5 .16685 ZACKS INC SCOOP SHOVELS/SNOW BRUSHES/CAR WASH-WATER 279.2 DEPT 6489913 11-16-93 9. VI NOVEMBER 16,1993 16686 EARL ZENT DUES-ASSESSING DEPT 60.00 14490 VOID OUT CHECK 100.00 41016167 VOID OUT CHECK 86.15 16243 VOID OUT CHECK 18.18 16296 VOID OUT CHECK 505.79 -65012 $1729171.08 i 410 11-16-93 10. ' DATE: 812 PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL ectcrrt�rairie RESOURCES COMMISSION AGENDA r October 25, 1993- 4111 FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of PRNR *---PV- DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. f F Parks, Recreation & Petition from the Residents of Topview.Addition 1.E A Natural Resources for Park Improvements PROPOSED ACTION: City staff recommend authorization to work with the residents of Topview Addition to transfer ,. ` the playground equipment presently located adjacent to the old Family Education Center to Topview Park in 1994. Citystaff recommend denial of therequest to provide a skating rink at Topview Park, as the . City received a similar petition a number of years ago and provided the service with very tl :A‘ ' use of the rink. OVERVIEW: Attached to this memo is a petition from residents in the Topview Addition requesting the City expand additional recreational opportunities at Topview Park. The major requests are for the provision of a skating rink and construction of a playground and other recreational facilities. 1111 Thepark is under 2 acres in size and contains a basketball court and anarea where " tb open space people can play informal games at a small scale such as touch football, soccer, whifflebal,etc. The City has generally eliminated the majority of the skating rinks that are not adjacent warming houses, as very few of these rinks are used. When rinks are not lighted and skaters s don't have access to warming facilities, the use is limited to nice weather days on weekends. These become very expensive facilities to maintain for that limited use. The petition also requested a playstructure, tennis courts, volleyball court, soccer, baseball or. softball field, etc. The neighborhood park that serves this area is Willow Park, located south of this neighborhood. That park does have a baseball field and tennis courts as well as a playstructure. The City will have access to a totlot playstructure when we remove the facilities . that served the Family Education Center. Staff would recommend installing these facilities in such a fashion that they would not intrude in the limited open space area at Topview Park. Topview Park is considered a "totlot" that provides recreation for preschool and early elementary age children. A 1.9 acre park is not large enough to provide facilities such as softball, baseball and soccer fields. PR IMARY ISSUES. . The installation of the playstructure could be done with some minimal cost to the City. City staff would hesitate to recommend the construction of any additional skating rinks without either 411. adding additional staff or limiting the number of trails that are being maintained in the winter :k months. Winter maintenance is focused on flooding and maintaining rinks, snow removal from rinks parking lots, trails and building enteries and removal of diseased trees within the park 7g / /IJg3 Petition from Residents of Topview Addition 4. October 25, 1993 Page 2 system. Over the last few years, the amount of trail citizens have requested to beamed has dramatically ink while we have added no additional staff. The maintenance of the:jai! system is at the point where some of the trails do not get plowed between.snowfalls; therefore, staff is rather uncomfortable about adding •any additional •winter facilities that require re ular maintenance without explaining that maintenance of other facilities will fall further behind. BL:mdd ill ,. , Action/Direction: Lt._\Lk A----)11 , • 1 1 :, tilE • -_idienLs of L Addition_in Eden da Prairie,;;. respectfully 1 r d ue s - that the T MI Prairie Parks :r r1i-_i.i ,•a7: j0115:ir1,3Yti + 1t T _1r .4tiya i. s •facilities of o vier'F Park., 72.9) 1 y: l •..erar: Drive. -r -sing to the City _a -.pen Prairie �:.� -��• ; 1 ._. , ,:1 ...::cording, vl"L'.�:. Eden J.li a--: �• u'i b r' r. i i i 1 1' r 1 riSOt Str?e1;.:r;:�n, r,re��.i•::`,.. .: F ty�r,,, �t'� .,;: 1^ :r N w rr ±r�F;�at'1r'r i u 1 r+ 'Y'rit ::t t.f ��� �`:.- f-5t S i i .LL.• _ _ r i��. t �i:,�._. .. _t_ L'��:��� �:a�i� , •.�1 _ "-.1 1 ._ T opr♦ew Park with allother parks o T ri d and maintained a1rtai+ d by the City shows that Tot v ew Park :ik is the least developed: having only one activity/facility ► ( offer (basketball court). The land L)et rjtri : y -vvi l�: space3 as 1�. i 'n T t +•1 r r�-i t• + l.i.ti- i �:`Li.:i nut to better it.r fi J -�.:a r:f.ii2_ +11{:i !1 Ctt-lIi'_ additional Till ;i T is•O t i.l itie= for area resident.;_ and .nd otli':oT;'1r r 5. s •ec ficall F, we r .r•.yt?er_t the O1lC Ariti:Y• (i) Provision of a rink for free skating for winter recreation. are y •rijf',re. who 'id in To 7v eT:} Addition� that would make u.s There rncti'i ' dill-_,:.:II 1' ':=a•_,� �i• i•:�: ,1•• i al:•Ft.+1t•1�.iI �:_•e f. and :a J a a t from this L f..l+ •a.. 1 . The closest i.: ska«harr rink is at Forest Hills. L _ ::hcof too fair for young cni•.,i!:firer. .�cce:__, •,rit!.milt parental supervision.. _ _:l�_'f:, r :.i for � ..iL_ :ii_=+a-__1 to access _r:li°v / ;:L.l i!f_.1 A rink at vieT?F `-a.r however, i-.:fir easily . cc�'_siby�IY+ +s f as regularly utilized. . :'�� „ a G.- 1'1.?• � l: 71)1.11d.i .. _.J l�� ��.••. :•Jti'11..' as well '_:_=.tl aj 1.14,:.1... ... The number of hc�L._el:c:d_ ,r�>^ cti.1 aren and :adolescent;_ is ircreui ;Y wit. iti lar��:. :;� ?i t..u .r.v et-:. in 1r-of�le ftr?cr!erst-,io _ ^.rig -Ql : 1 'l n TAT+- esi•fie - :-.:r'e :.5-1 ._._ra l'r��._ ' _ i ,. _.a .. :5: _.v .: .t:•_._ .:.L.11`.L�lr-�{'{.t.,.ii~'1:: f_�`i r'_•��1�-. t'l:!':-_ _-_. _ 'S°•_i ja their p 1Ya of "I ,T oZT O: _ed fa i_.l_&5_ with preschool through Tit l am-=ch ooi _ _ :d 411/ (2) E ansion of playaroundlrecreational facilities for summer 0- recreation. JThis could include. any of the r .;jlor? inch l ys rttctltre tennis, volleri _ . softb:�+ Ibasei'al er read: -s t- opportunities: wo.ul ��.�: ..._.ii v .._. l;?•=ttSi'i• etc. Again, t"- {Y }'t-1'_i '+ access to 1 1 ! would �l, more 1 v•_ �t'... J�. v•1.•:i. _._�.+ � better _,i'r' - r--, f•- tPas i,:i7. ll ;( Ilse the it oca1-e:' acreage 1 `.� L _ _•i:i..I�:.J _ . iI. . 1- :--- .1 ._:r:: _ rather than maim i♦'. r is idle the :iiceoi. of the basketball i cow Piece,� Llill'_' an essentially L +li: (.with 1- r 1'•1#i Li• ar=�ai.. lr J._'. .f ground. i "', .:t•' l l.li�•_+•.r tie'-_+4, enelo :. ':.Lii - a _ .._ ,�:if•:^.i-s•= Y+ f j�T 'Ft::'.`.?.:r: +- _.i:}iV' -iy:'ii� _ul i'•.• .' ,a _.l 610C—kkfl L;277c C,),1 t' • .67-4_6(' 4 C6v 440 12. 1-f L thoil-OvJp .3 tee.4 Pitic..--T 4 crw(J ' 4. I. 1_c_is . . 0 N CHI 7 ,:7 "--47-1-.4"( 91- ) / ch � VA,,LC)/Ait v1) ;- ,/- / "A"7 741 • -c, yr 41 . U Ln ' O 2 �r.{?La/1+• DIfle.CA-L.1/44_4k_ r4";2(5tr(-1 -', i)e. i.uP19 ' flip.0, t —TI ,� ' �L� `:C7 to fVI tu,, 1 g KLe...v-e-,_ • L,1Q, . �j4 .A561114)� 7 io 'zty' GL G. 4 /, „ 730.3 /.2v;-ew 0 l--/- 1,4u) -1-c41-14...J IZLti-L...- rot, RR J /{.7-) I v,:;-! i44-cd:t-,;L. P.v • (-2 '1i . 0 Vr1/_Lv (q,".:2 cj-• _1 1,(-Q_ 1.),/t-rti • 4Aii-ito-Qt& Av-loiv). .bki , /A-750 r24c• 16 - eh, -.I- 9276-44/aLmec.7a 7Y7 G4�. 4k-a, i ag,_ Joel& 5- , ('-e-- °) 414-44-- i 46-ar, A/4"icd 51-[./ /1 of r. Z/ •) ad ei,,. ! (2 4 ://t . li ca,Iii.,2 iLo.,,,'2,i,J 62_ 7:1 9'() I 7s)--'i--L'eLJ /) •Ac, �� 0 ;r.,�, ; 7 3 7.3 47i,R. C.1 r. pr.t.,/i .4; • 1,,y(----hi—Ktfiz /Id//6/93 14amsz l; .reeo' atolidrar • 61-me Y D d ii9G-4) A 76 /q `A- 1LI 'Z , Graz RA/ C • 4-j-Gier 7c (7A a.7&0 Sed (A6a /ZY0 /6V9g 5 • UNAPPROVED MINUTES MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1993 7:00 P. M. CITY CENTER TRAINING ROOM 8080 MITCHELL ROAD COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Richard, Chair; Bruce Bowman, Richard Brown, Claire Hilgeman,Joanne Kube-Harderwijk, Diane Popovich Lynch COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: David Kracum STUDENT MEMBER: Mark Bremer COMMISSION STAFF: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources; Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape architect; Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by chair Pat Richard. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA • Brown requested to add an item under New Business - Staff Reports to Commission. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Hilgeman, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion passed 6-0. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 4. 1993 MOTION: Moved by Hilgeman, seconded by Kube-Harderwijk, to approve the minutes as written. Motion passed 6-0. IV. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition from Topview Neighborhood for Improvements to Neighborhood Totlot- Lambert reviewed the petition from the residents in the Topview neighborhood and explained that Topview Park is a 1.9 acre totlot that is designed to provide a play space for young children in the neighborhood that cannot safely use the neighborhood park. Willow park, located approximately one-half mile south of Topview mini park, is the neighborhood park designed to serve this neighborhood. A neighborhood park typically provides recreation facilities such as a ballfield, tennis courts, playground structure and, in some cases, picnic facilities. A mini park generally provides a small open space area for 6 /o/I&/95 Minutes - PRNR Commission • Monday, November 1, 1993 unorganized play and usually playground facilities. Topview Neighborhood Park has a basketball court and an open play area, but no play equipment. Lambert pointed out that the petition was for a skating rink and for playground equipment, as well as a request to consider other facilities that are typically provided in a neighborhood park. Lambert indicated that the staff could not support a request for another skating facility without reducing maintenance on some of the trail system during the winter months. He also pointed out that the use of outdoor skating rinks without warming facilities is minimal and would not recommend beginning to provide those facilities. Even though many neighborhoods petition for those facilities, City staff experience is that once they are provided they are not used. The service area for our outdoor skating rinks is a two mile radius. The skating rink that serves this neighborhood is the rink at Forest Hills School Park. Liza Ashley, a resident of the Topview neighborhood, stated that the population of her neighborhood has changed. Many families with young children have moved into this neighborhood and they would appreciate anything the City can do to upgrade Topview Park. Ms. Ashley suggested repairs to the basketball court, installing the play equipment as proposed by the City staff and perhaps a • picnic table and a garbage can. Ms. Ashley indicated that Roberts Drive is a busy road and that she feels it is unsafe for many children to cross that road on their way to Willow Park. Cross stated that the basketball court at Topview is scheduled for an asphalt overlay early next year. Lambert indicated that the playground equipment that is being removed from the old Family Center site could be installed next summer. Hilgeman noted that the City should also correct the drainage problem near the basketball court prior to installing the asphalt overlay. Cross stated that regrading is part of the project. MOTION: Moved by Hilgeman, seconded by Kube-Harderwijk, to support the staff recommendation to install the playground equipment as per the staff recommendation, and to add in the 1995 budget a higher level climber and a swing set, and to improve the basketball court and install a picnic table and garbage can in 1994. Bowman suggested that if there is money available in 1994 those improvements should be made next year, rather than waiting until 1995. Motion passed unanimously. B. Request for Optimist Club to Use Parking Lot in Round Lake Park for Christmas Tree Sales - Lambert reviewed the letter from Wayne Gilbertson, fund raising • chair, for the Optimist Club. Lambert stated that the City staff support the request from the Optimist Club to use the small parking lot immediately west of 7 DATE ` ,.. :: ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ' ,...,....*--.1,...,..----. � ) SECTION: Petitions & Requests . November 16 DEPARTMENT:. . ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM . Engineering Divnsn -R, Eugene A. Dietz r,� • Aho Drainage Request VIILB.. Recommended Action: On November 16, Brad and Bev Aho will request that the City take action to resolve a linage issue on their property at 12742 Gordon Drive. The issues in this request are`sirlular.in the litigation that has been going on between the Interstate Detroit Diesel and the City of-Eden Prairie. It is my interpretation that the City has no legal responsibilities in the issues that:the Aho's will bring forward, but they will presumably ask the City to re-route drainage around the perimeter of their property. It would appear that the obvious choices that you could consider. are: 1. Do nothing 2. Install improvements at the sole expense of the Aho's 3. Install improvements at the sole expense of the City . 4. Install improvements on a shared basis la • Overview: 410 The following statementsbelieveanof the drainage issues olio g I are accurate listing facts surrounding that will be presented to you: 1. The Aho's purchased the property approximately August, 1991. 4 2. The property is part of Topview Acres 3rd Addition, which was platted in July, 1963. 3. The date of street and drainage improvements in the area is not known exactly,but:are believed to be shortly after the plat in 1964 or 1965. 4. The subdivision was constructed prior to sanitary sewer and water being available And the developer installed street and storm sewer at no expense to the City. 5. The City approved the design of the project, which included a storm sewer outlet akmg , .; the west property line of the subject property, approximately 160 feet from the right-of-: way line of Gordon Drive. The discharge point was "low land" as identified on the 1963 plat. 6. The City did not request, nor did the developer grant, an easement over all of the "low . land" identified on the plat. 7. The home on this property was constructed in 1974. 8. Prior to 1991, we are not aware of any requests for service due to storm drainage in this area. 9. In addition to the storm sewer that runs along the west line of the subject property, there • is also a storm sewer that runs through the City park and discharges to the "low land". 1 110 , ,.., November 16, 1993 Item No. VIII.B.1 10. It appears that some regrading of the property owned by the City manyears_ o and that some regrading of the ro �tl��e: ; , P y g P Perty Immariatelyt o - ^ , Aho lot was regraded. It does not appear that these regrading,efface cban the that the drainage occurs in the area. _ _ 11. The area drains throe h a culvert that was installed with 1-494 near , ,. ' y �y g .--� the northwest; of the Aho property. �. 12. Barr Engineering, acting as the engineer for the Watershed I trio, a '' delineation on the property. The wetland edge appears to approximate the line original plat showing the "low land". 13. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has indicated that they are` aware of public health concerns that would be associated with runoff from this type of . We have spent a considerable amount of time dealing with the owners of this property and developed preliminary designs of methods to pipe the storm water to the culvert and - 494. The issue has always been who will pay for the improvements if they are to be dome. The one method of financing the project that I would strongly recommend against would be art area- wide assessment that would include cost being assessed against other property owners in the neighborhood. While it may be legally possible, the likelihood of sustaining assessments beense of improved value to any other property in the neighborhood would be extremely remo r Supporting Information: MIIIF Attached to this memorandum is a sizeable packet of information as follows: 1. Copy of a portion of the final plat for Topview Acres 3rd Addition shoesthe proximity of the Aho Property to 1-494 and the City park.. 2. Site plan of the property showing building location s 3. An estimate of cost dated 09/07/93 that would pipe the storm sewer around the of the property. 4. Copy of the judges order regarding the Interstate Diesel litigation that barred them from claiming a taking of the property that occurred prior to the dates that they owned. the parcel. 5. A series of 14 letters from or to -- the property owners regarding the issues. November 16, 1993 Item No: VIIIB.2 AI 6', •e. \tbi �fQl -.-•- ., �M 1, f t—* b• d"A'• fr .,.r' ,iit.?: Yr,. r, ,cr, , 1- r' 4 f i (Jiyr41. f'fr ' 1 �,. f r .ss , . ,JI ryf4' J''K G ;4 7',. {• ,1 J, ,, (, z4py '+liilrr� f - #>} --,7...•.,.-.'.1.•,-....7,.:---,1...,-,'-,.i..,._ i. +K+S rM": =w r '1"' M 1 i).* f> F f k r r. 5 - a�� ,.- 2'. .!'F{A{? a , )�igml.6� >' d 4.'T.t..t, 1 f.e , 4 7 s`C+,�, Safi > "��' ,, } 7!d ,Ps F•,.; ,J4 -is u •:. �,'.J ;,• ..7 r , s s-t•. r tV -. +!.rin 1,,.. - ., ,y,,. 'V+•• 4i14> !•••,!?TJ' 1�41.r s Ate,•"W.rx . ,,. 'r •„e i hy: j4 t;•.;.3(.1,!1•.,r" G? ! r';.,r2l.>��Fp«iI ftgit7,-, i ,, k4 t , lr f{ 1 '`ri S:'It: ,, K'• "',(Z, .: i. •,,' x 3EARIAM65 SHOWN A Q. ,, . ( rl. e rz , n' pp '' 11 NJ`:' UL *DEMOTES .IRON T ,r, � . ° SCAT. ri tom, t. F. - s LP' j VA • C tA\14.g( • Vk1G SP�1 I w W. a �� • °C.-\ 11 , , ..•....,.. N���6•��1'' \10 tt+e^k aS ,� Ease N • r\bed\n j • 6Q L/,/� �{.. -? :\,,.40 d,e.5 . s •ff.-.. • \ • 1 i .q4 AlMli? yl "•., \` H.1 "' ,tea \ -1 1: I ��loo I r l71 e i tC Q, 1 tL l DO o I st \\ `\ k : I j .off b� R:40109 .. ?�` i N $, s>4 !2 ' N. -a/ 1 1 '�.�f19 ` Q 1� 4,4 a \ V► N._.� 4 • 1 . iiiiii • • [J �64 i7�� 1� 1�I.� :_ Y �/- ;;i ic. �w.s. � +l`..Z«4/� v9 7 • z: '3r "iv..r w't ry ♦ �, ~ ` • ,i [ A.l t a ` .:. _ I } "�`;. h$ l► I Rh�liE' d. ., 9ni�4.e�M• Y '"�' 't • ♦ _ \� _ rr» 5 _ • • . '2!.. ••, ,r1 -- 'I:, 'Xs • 1 V k , • i I) •.. s.....- / S \(. -- " -- . ' N"-----0 r .1 r r t% is..14 • ,r 12744 1 1\1 • - 1, I ' i ' ((ss -• -.'-- • , ..., 30 36 4 -0' , ,)22.80 ,i ilM ..514e1.4i laj E7.8787 9 r. ........- : 1_% • _ \ ./ ' . N./4879de °--__39.2 --• -2 —,;-1- — i -1--, -- -- T , ;,,..., .. ,..,... . \ ITA -Q, I Et 8 7 Si 9 9 -0 NO -33 1. lik . (7') 'd Q\ 16 1 El. 865.09 ' \ - f , ...• C. c0 \ TVA 4 1 k• --A i•-s, o•.: ". ... ,t..ti sit ; 1.,.c 1... • - : , - / / . . • I-11 I`...• ' st,' A • • I 0 \ -.... 0N) Itral CI,-"•'''' a', ''''' -, t• N ; ; I'•' C, 3 so !- s. , , • o• " , , 03 1 0.-r- q. c0 L•- - ‘" n9 17 872.dy ,t.3, ,.. .„ L. \... -I. ca .4 .. c)Et 877:97- •--3.--i.--;,-- r A G \ - f \---..- --- --1 -----i 1 , •,-4 • . . •.... . :.• A.31 Jo I . L'''e '•i ____Lt2,, 4. • e ,' '' ‘`' /: 0' ----"--- "r - I Proposed basement floor _ .• .. , -`9.9. „ - I N. t _, f."--3 : ---'4- — elevat ion = 813.2 / , , • , . .% .,.., / 'r„ /.9 , • . t ..PZ . A. .., 1.3 ) 0 . . ..... .) . , ..... •4 t.-///' I Z 0,, ....1 . I 4, .. ,, st •. ,-.1 /i 1 1,,,. ,/ ‘‘, ‘ ,• , / . . ALTERNATE COST ESTIMATE Revised 09/07/93 Description Est Qty Unit Price Amount 18" HDPE 290 LF $ 22/LF $ 6,380 24" HDPE 245 LF $ 26/LF $ 6,370 Manhole 3 EA $ 800/EA $ 2,400 Remove 24" RCP end section, extend pipe, Lump Sum $1500/LS $ 1,500 and construct C.B. with frame and grate* Tree Removal/Restoration Lump Sum $1500/LS $ 1,500 TOTAL = $18,150 * Requires a MnDOT Permit • 410 Dsk:GD.AHO-3 LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUBURBAN PLACE BUILDING 250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE,SUITE 370 • EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344 TELEPHONE:(612)829-7355 ilk Mr FAX:(612)829.0713 MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE ROIIERT 1.LAND 4400 IDS CENTER ROC Lit A.PAULY $0 SOIJ111 Glolrfll 3TRL'GT I)AVID II.mitintil.SON• MtNNf:AYOt.13,MINNESOTA 33402 RICIIARD F.ROse)W (612)3311-0755 AIAIIK J.JOI INSON I'AX(612)349.0111 JOS1LI1l A.NIL.AN Jim IN W,LANG,CI'A REPLY TO UDEN PRAIRIE OFPICa: JUDtTII II,DUTC1I1A UARDARA M.Rt3SS MR.MII.I.I:R TODD A.SA FAX COVER SHEET 1'ODSAVIOR J1:NNIVER M,INZ •Ahl Aoilw.Ltd to Pooled I to.M.Wisconsin THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE PERSONS OR ENTITIES NAMED BELOW. IF YOU ARE NOT SUCH PERSONS OR ENTITIES, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISTRIBUTION, DISSEMINATION OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR , PLEASE IMMEDIATELY CALL US AT (612) 829-7355. • TO : Dia i • • FAX # : TIME : • L1.1-15 err . NO . : 3 DATA . AGES . (Includes -cover sheen- FROM : a 49 LANG, AULY & GREGERS LTD. 250 PRAIRIE CENTER DR E, SUITE 370 EDEN PRAIRIE , MN 55344 FAX # : (612) 829. 713 PHONE # : (612) 829-7355 MESSAGE : J�-r -e-A C.A; y T , . , f� , . • • • • PLEASE CONTACT FACSIMILE OPERATOR Susan AT (612) 829-7355. IF '. 4111 TRANSMISSION IS INCOMPLETE OR CANNOT 8L REAU, . I0 . CT I ,a. 7..7 TO STATE OF MINNESOTA • DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN l'3 r .3 22 30 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Fi�r,�• • •: OL$E TYPE: INVERSE CONDEMNATION COURT M(Trl'li--.. Interstate Companies of Court File No. 92-7006 Minnesota, Inc„ Interstate Detroit Diesel, Inc. f/k/a Interstate Diesel Products, Inc., and Vlsioncorp, Inc., ORDER Petitioners, vs. City of Eden Prairie, Respondent. • The above-captioned matter came before the undersigned Judge of District Court on the submissions of the parties regarding a procedure to attempt to resolve this matter through mediation. Bused on all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: I. During March of 1993, the parties shall negotiate with each other to see if a resolution is possible without need of mediation. 2. If the parties are unable to settle the matter by April 15, the matter will be mediated by Mr. Robert J. Sheran on that date or as soon thereafter as may fit Mr. Sheran's schedule. 11110 -1- i/-/t -93 /37 Z9 -d C T I i.i C.7 Q7 T O FJ tI^-}I� I�TI�•1 A.-1M-4-1 , 2. Petitioners' motion for partial summary judgment 411 on Respondent's eighth defense, with the exception of the prescriptive rights defense, is hereby DENIED. 3 , Respondent's motion for partial summary judgment that Petitioners are barred by the six-year statute of limitations from recovering damages for the taking of Petitioners' property, if any, by Respondent that occurred more than six years prior to the commencement of the action on April 13 , 1992 , is GRANTED. Petitioners are barred from claiming damages that occurred more than six years prior to the commencement of the action, pursuant to the six-year statute of limitations. 4 . Respondent's motion for partial summary judgment that Petitioners' are barred from recovering damages for the41, taking of their property, if any, that occurred prior to the dates Petitioners purchased the parcels of property that are the subject matter of the above-entitled action is GRANTED. Petitioners are barred from claiming damages for the taking of property that occurred prior to the dates that they owned the parcels of property. 5 . The issues of whether there was a taking of Petitioners' property, and when the alleged taking occurred, are fact questions which the Court will submit to the jury at trial. DATED: BY THE COURT: (:4.) 1, 11 ICI 67dr"4.-AJ-241 411 Harold Kalina Judge of the District Court • April 1, 1993 Mr. Gene Dietz, Director Public Works, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Dietz: As per our meeting with you this afternoon, I have enclosed the letter from Ceil Strauss of the DNR regarding her designation that our property is not DNR Wetlands. Also enclosed, are copies of the City of Eden Prairie Zoning map, which contains flood plain information, and the FIRM map containing flood plain information. You will notice that both of these maps exclude our property from the flood plain. I also reviewed our Title information and survey. As we believed, no easement appears to have been requested by nor granted to the City of Eden Prairie for the purpose of ground sewer drainage. As a result of this information, we had no way of knowing prior to purchasing and living on this property that this serious problem with ground drainage existed. • From our meeting today, it is our understanding that the City will repair the damage to our side yard by filling the eroded areas and planting grass seed and/or sod. Also, the City will investigate the cause of this overflow and erosion from the street drains on Gordon Drive. We understand that these repairs will be "on hold" until an agreement regarding a solution for the entire property is finalized. As per our telephone conversation, it is my understanding that you will contact Mr. Bob Obermeyer to request a determination of wetland vegetation and that the boundaries of this area will be marked. It is our understanding that we will incur no cost for this determination. However, it is not clear to me what jurisdiction the Watershed District has regarding our property, regardless of the type of vegetation now growing in our yard, as the maps we have clearly exclude our residence from the flood plain. I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a reference to an ordinance or guideline which discusses this. We very much appreciate your attention to this problem. Please contact us if you or your engineers discover any other alternative solutions which we can consider. By continuing to work t gether, I believe we will find a cost-effective, viable solution for c:: d. erne ly, Ir • Beverly J. Encrosures April 1, 1993 • Meeting with Mr. Gene Dietz Director of Public Works for the City of Eden Prairie Regarding: Recurring Drainage Problem and Property Damage Brad and Bev Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 944-7055 Problem #1: The street drains on Gordon Drive are unable to drain the water from the streets. This causes major flooding on our property, and has resulted in the destruction of our side yard. Solution: The drains are not adequate for containing the water, and must be enlarged.• There is also a problem with the drains clogging. Problem #2: Damage to our side yard, due to the run-off from the street. Solution: The side yard must be filled, graded back to its original level and seeded. • Problem #3: The drains from Gordon Drive and Gerard Drive, empty onto our property, allowing over 20 acres of ground-water run-off to be directed and dumped in our back yard. There is no provision for the water to drain from our property and no provision for the proper containment of this water. As a result, our back yard has been eroded and damaged, and the majority of it is unusable. There are many solutions to this problem: 1. Continue the underground pipe from the drains off Gordon and Gerard to the culvert which would direct the water into the Bryant Lake area. Fill in the damaged area of our back yard, grade level and seed with grass. 2. Provide an aesthetically appropriate, sodded ditch around our property for the water to be directed into the culvert. Fill in the damaged area of our back yard, grade level and seed with grass. 3. Build a containment area for this water in the park property, using layers of appropriate materials to allow dr inage. Fill in the damaged area of our back yard, grade level and seed with grass. ,sr€4,5.,- (-III"- • 7A-`7X r n m zn-1- ! X- C it.r<a-- f),;(; 7 !,v/✓ef`71--- v l-2, "fc l ii/g-9 3 cA./-. >1/..c, l,✓a.-7v /'-e ,ate G4.-'A- ri, 72/ 72 if) STATE OFC. Ceidtarr-- / • LkriikrirgZOTA 1 . INNESOTA I� NATURAL . RESOURCES 1990 DEPARTMENT OF N, URAL RESOUR .ES Metro Waters, 1200 WarnerPaul, 55'Rd. , St. MN �05 PHONE NO. 772-7910 MEMO. October 7 , 1991 Ms. Bev Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 RE: WETLANDS/FLOODPLAIN ON PROPERTY, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Ms. Aho: As we discussed at your property, on September 25, ' 1991, DNR protected wetland 27-814W does not extend as far as your property; therefore, any filling that you consider will not require DNR involvement. However, portions of your property do appear to be wetland of the type regulated by the U. S. Corps of Engineers. I suggested you contact Joe Yanta (220-0362) at the Corps for further information. • Regarding the floodplain, I left a copy of the Flood Insurance Rate . Map (FIRM) for the area that includes your property. That map • indicates what is considered floodplain for flood insurance . purposes. The city of Eden Prairie regulates filling and other activities in the floodplain. It is possible that the floodplain indicated on .the FIRM is not as extensive as that used by the city for floodplain regulation. There are several reasons for this: 1) the city' s regulatory floodplain was calculated for ultimate growth conditions (i.e. , more conservative) , 2) the city would be using the best available information, which may be more current than that used to develop the FIRM, and 3) the city may have more accurate maps of the topography in the area than those used to draw the flood boundaries in the FIRM. You will need to work with the city (and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District) to determine where the floodplain is on your Property and what filling/activities are allowed. ' The DNR gets involved (by submitting comments to the city) only if a landowner asks for a variance to the city' s ordinance -or conditional use permit in the floodplain. The DNR also provides oversight for the city' s administration of the floodplain ordinance. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have further questions. Sincerely, �r Cell Strauss410 Azea Hydrologist cc: Randy Slick, cit.,/ of Eden Prairie Joe Yana, USCCE Bob Obermeyer, Nine Mile Creek WSD AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER n //-/6 -93 2272 / / , ".i ,is , '�R.� � , � 1-G R', e q PUB 'ri } / 4k�. t '1 tJ r ,- -. r. i ' "° ill,..•, , � NCO + j t \, a� S., • 41-_ C•REG-SER :, ' "1le. :QFc 16. 11 - " -t C 17— Ri 1�5 :+'�: kP ?1 R 4."'�O.rJ , - A'r't+ ut.:� \\ -_._--- K' ,� , . I .... szv l' PUB f k ~ ~• .®\ ;t\� ~ l, y4: .n\\ I 1':� S• �f .� t,... rat �t ��, \ /����1w ..__J�_-._ •-t. l•�` /� • Ilk `l ,y.� • '+1 tT . l.. .j- t t. J 11. j: (� 'i•• ' . ..',i`` , 141.22.' L > r yy� • r ( ;• . '''''' / : .�. t R1 22 �r n ri - 1 • tt \� .t '' �'.1.. . * 1k14 „r+ , 115 ' .q1 �c �t 1 ..+t 00 •]]}',,' •�� I . j 1ti ,1+ _.� „ •:;� r 1. �1 =7t•lli r —_ 1 ."' ,. 1' i . r e i '� t { �, \:: {, Yr�. 1'� t '1 :::: i \''. • t ( ' ' 12 x4 IF - - •RM r,5 i ,1 �,! .. .• ,� '\\ tt'''p` '-�' x " �ry •} 1 _ :lihI./ .._. ,!Vf-5._ I1t !��+• t • I j i J i •s'/.,,o,t 1 ` A\ �.`� r''i,;f �. /``tG. ,�F tl'+ .... I-'Z :il: I,2 j i c. 'A-25 M ' ,F Y_iG + t 1 ti.�i �..,,,� {f•C� G Alibi, `` , '1 i +(11 9 1— (/i.s:• •( l••)}.••4 • f �. 7 1 ..trs S.� I Y�//.. Y 'ti 2 1...( I • ri r / ,,,,_..*.i{ ,1' _,\ wy.� •!w - �f ,). � '+ ,) `: I :l I!I • i ;. RIt�8 -' q( (� ` � � t1 ?4:1 '• �� 1 A-2.s I 'it:1! i aIf 1-if., y.,\ OFC p,,,A,,....1.4I ff 4m,i. i 12, C-REGS + ar •, �"r l i i • j t i Y" 1" eitEG SER ) rFc' EG5 • y \ j I ®API c•REG-S / 4 ` 11 r.•co�1' it _ 1 aF I e��yT t t oFe COM C-RECt.S : ':J ..▪_ y , (9 —6 '�- _ . ; . COM rc` L`et._ .�. -tea -1---r r� �"" -� Z t ��` �•��R Z t �� '� fi„� Rt • �: ' ;�► (:F'C ililiJi': -° i ... .,.‘;..,,, ).): . 1-5 j '7 ' 1, '> 1 ' — L r i �. ; } ii i , �-rya-s - �r� ,, LL,, _ .(`�.�." ±e . ..'� 0•RE6-SE' _ .L-'f'f�7l� _..._ _ _'- 1 5_ . ___ 1%...,........,e); (/ k‘,.,,,,... : a CR • •,:i"CRE4= . E ``. • i tt' i ;;1iPc 1 r . • C� • 1".- • ';' + ., ;, C4REG • i t* ;t RM 2 .._ / , C { RM-6 fr, :� C C=RE6-SER s ( , S t • • • , .,.r„., 1-`. C•RhQ-SERj Q. Q M k r a a p L't �I:x 1 k RM ,_5 r • `► G- :. � \`VF .r P !~� ri. , . am C �JV _ _ ��•{ • L . w){- ; . PI:t s ,t-1 iY`YIYYr ,w.. 'a `�•� ty� • It 1•� .� • • ' 1 / /::RIY4 2 5 1i\\\� ,1' C c ER :girull*� ,''.�a r.'a i -s iL---- I gyp' •rzr e ,.\\� _ :y T• , �'t'.� 1 L S ettli;;::: (-' ii. i'•.>'/ ^'ls_ _._ �..� tY��11A r8r. ▪ �t`*-� y B ," P'• i� 1; ij } �i' .- ?,� IE, a• { t'r •+,�• �' J f} 'r! -f t_- ?-_____ , _ E.-. 6 ice"- r i-\ <, y t„ ( .t .r �� • . �1 'N r,h1 13.:i,:, F�1 ,.. ,i rr P: 'y ".Rai13 S: \ -- - .. R1.9.-5 '"'S' J ';.1-til 't � IJJ q •S-' 1:: N. • - i-!••/ �y 1.. ���'t j: i i i' L! RM a # r bFt r,l S r . RM•2:5 ,V ', 1`1''trig e+N� _( ; R1 135 �� i + '1'--i ^s 839 •: CON 1-1F'i* S 1 .!' 1 4 WM -t ('f i i I I1r� ++��i l - RM-A 5� ilir -- _ A'.3 Ir �. 1r s J 1 1P��J..— 1 ', i' ;▪ l i_,' 7.+':r r r •' 'I f + C_ --�..•-�\) NI,•2.5 • A ( (,``. _At' _ IMPS ti .. h , . F,P. .,.,.*r ' i l�' .r•.•a /R - ,�. '`a• tRM (� j i 1: t Tz... R is 'S �' 1 I 11 1 1�1i 3 J I1 �. /� l�_• \ RM-QS t .. [ k —.-.. : �.,1 �' i+i - � ; ` t !/r`J f0 I i v = '� -r o?v ZONE A/ 0 ~ ��� (� • .. = r�..:�,• ZONE C ; 4,�: eT• \� t • r ` EDENvaLElC Po/ .\ '\ .1. `,� Ilr " \\ IN i ,K P WLANp I 79 Vs 0iANAGE ii n Ir ,______„, ,,„....,,.....,.. .4,5„ ,„ .., . ,,,„, ,, ., . 66TN'S7REE7 i \ / ST}1T�C•PO ROAD •�T b K' I�.�--7"Jv I MANCNESTER FF" T 'n:1 q / I h II LANE •. \\\\ \�_�� \9O �//11 1 • \\\\ �i/— '1 \,'I J //\\` ....ay ^. �\\\\ ,,T. �'4 r. i L \\\ II //�i OLLv ROAD �Y\ - t+ !E i': " Y K tiY ° �•L$ II((flf ' ----]i _ o a Y+nz }- ff A� gl�`A r \` BEACN i E f =SIT •� \p �,�, S\\ L f% —1,, /:„.,, •-•,,::.'.....;',::' ,::'ll;..:!::::7:- .:-...1-:::::,Z.:0,'3.0.;kk_;';?:;.'4:.. Ui Sq�P�Ei � ? I DRI\E' C�\U 1�•L K_ Zj / _� I l •¢ ZONE C • ZONE A ? 6 • • ri 1 II ' II 1. c y/ 11 II° w \'� \ �� %� \a\ Ir rl i� 11 II ii I o:l���CS a�� 1, C. •.. ,. :... : , • \ . 1 ` _ I �O,l /� ROBERTS \ !I II \\\ / \� HIbE II= \\\ ! m ZONE:'t , V POP 1 Y I� II HAVE 1 ( • WILLOW!' / 0 . ! WEN --��j( / I I, W000 li � C ' l.\ V E �� .W/'1 C, W Ill - °� ZONE C /�, ��,� vPLI_,�I , y; / /A / P \ k g0g0 KI /./_/•.i,-• .- , pot ! i,. . ., „---.---4,4 ,. ..1 . n—\,:, xui:., 1..\, it•• , 11 i��N . 1 1 \ ,• ,•, !,,,,, II / , ., /9 l „: \�O�r „....k.. �II . ... // S { _ \B:` II OPJE 1/ P`AZA `��� \l \�l� / �' . . • : . .-. t • - ROA0 II ZONE A; • \�� \\:: tt :T I� `'4 WEST .IT. STREET \ '_ - � April 2, 1993 • Mr. Gene Dietz, Director Public Works, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Dietz: Enclosed, is a copy of the agenda we discussed during our meeting with you yesterday. Although I have been discussing this issue with you and your department for the past 19 months since September of 1991, we want to be on record as having formally requested the City to look into this problem and work with us toward a viable solution. Again, prior to purchasing this property, we had no knowledge of this drainage problem, as there are no easements and this is not a Wetlands area. Only after moving in and witnessing the water, did we recognize and locate the source of this problem. When I requested that your department send an engineer to study this, he was astounded at how poorly the drainage system had been done. However, all that is in the past, and rather than look at what was done, we are only interested now in what can be done to correct this situation. As we discussed, the City of Eden Prairie has never obtained any expressed legal rights to • direct storm sewage onto our property. In addition, the City has never contained nor maintained this water. It has simply been left to erode and destroy our property by the many various courses it has fashioned over the years. The amount of water directed onto oura/ property has prevented the majority of it from being used. Not only has this water damaged our property, but it has created a dangerous health hazard as well. In the 20 months we have lived here, we have had standing water in all but three. The water does not drain off of our property, but has created its own low spots where it collects and molds. Two of our children and my husband have been tested and identified as having allergies, and two have suffered from convulsions; this constant source of irritant must be remedied. You stated during our meeting that there may be other cases in Eden Prairie that are identical or similar to ours. If there are any other cases in Eden Prairie where the City is directing and dumping this large amount of ground water onto private family-residence property in a neighborhood community that is not a DNR Wetlands area, and for which the City has not obtained an easement, please let me know these addresses. Perhaps these people have been able to identify solutions to their problem that we could use, as well. Again, we appreciate your attention to this very serious problem. The spring thaw has resulted in continued deterioration of our property. Please contact us if you or your e 'neers discover any other alternative solutions which we can consider. By continuing to (ork together, I believe we will find a cost-effective, viable solution for all concerned. Sin'ere y, I IIII' s I Bev r y J. Enclosures Prir/ ilY / 4/ // lC _ _ eda41 . April 5, 1993 • Mr. Gene Dietz, Director Public Works, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear M . Dietz: - After our discussion on April 1 regarding the drainage situation, I have consulted with an engineer and contractor who designs and constructs sewer and water drainage systems. He will be researching the cost of using a sensor-operated pump to pump the water from the swale or containment area if/when the water level reaches a specific height. Our preliminary investigation has led us to believe that your estimate of$200,000.00 for a pump was quite high - by two orders of magnitude. Clearly, we misunderstood each other and were talking about two different things. Anyway, we will continue to work with him to determine what technology offers in specific types of pumps, as well as their costs. We will also be working with him to determine the amount of water (i.e. number of gallons) that are directed onto • our property for given amounts of rainfall. Using computer compilation and actual rainfall data from the weather bureau, we should be able to convert this information to determine the average total amount of water that is directed onto our backyard in an average year. This should help us quantify the size of the problem. Once the problem has been quantified, the size of a swale or containment area necessary to contain this water, can easily be calculated. Regarding your concerns as to bringing heavy equipment into the area, there is currently no evidence that would indicate that this would be a problem. NSP hired crews with heavy equipment to trim and chip the trees last fall -- before the ground was frozen. Please note that our yard is not a swamp or muck/muddy area, except in those areas where the water has been allowed to flow and pool. Also, I have been informed that heavy equipment can easily be transported and is often used in very soft and swampy areas, via the use of various methods for support. Perhaps "heavy" equipment will not even be necessary to perform the work needed here, as mid-size back hoe/bulldozer/truck may be sufficient. We are continuing to research this problem to provide you with as much information as we can. We strongly believe that the City has an obligation and responsibility to maintain its water drainage systems, and that failing to have done so in the past, in no way justifies continued neglect. We appreciate your attention to this very serious problem. By continuing to work togeth r, I believe we will find a cost-effective, viable solution for all concerned. Sincerely, • Beverly J. Aho April 14, 1993 Mr. Gene Dietz, Director Public Works, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Dietz: As we discussed today on the telephone, the engineer from Barr has staked out the area which he may consider to be a wetland. As I said, it appears as though he chose the point at which the grass in our backyard ends; needless to say, Brad and I are disturbed by this finding. I very much appreciate your suggestion of having Barr engineering re-evaluate this finding toward the end of May, when vegetation has had an opportunity to grow. However, as I stated on the phone, the point at which "what vegetation grows where" continues to be somewhat moot, as this can and is changed every year by the residents of • every property. I find it very odd that our neighbors' yards on either side of us, whose grass extends beyond ours, is obviously not a wetlands. Also, the park, which was sod and adjoins our property on the south, is not a wetlands. It begs the question, Will putting sod throughout our yard make it not a wetlands, too? During our conversation, you alluded that because the water pipes run in the same direction as the natural flow of water, the "wetland" that may exist on our small piece of property existed before this area was developed and has not been changed with the addition of the development and storm sewer pipes. However, I would contend that the "wetland" that is currently in our backyard is due entirely to the storm sewers; futhermore, I believe that whatever the "natural"flow of water in this area might have been, it no longer exists. This "natural" flow was disrupted and changed when MNDOT constructed 494. It was disrupted and changed when NSP bulldozed through to erect the high-voltage power lines. It was disrupted and changed when the Metropolitan Sewer System was buried. It was disrupted and changed when the roads in this neighborhood were built. It was disrupted and changed when fill was brought in to create the park. It was again changed with each additional home that was built in this area, and for every tree that has been cut down. The amount of water that now occurs after every rain, which runs like a river down Gordon Drive, pooling in the street drains and dumping into our yard, did not even exist before this area was developed. The problem is, that either no one performed the proper engineering simulations, or the technology did not exist to give proper consideration to the effect that this amount of water would have on one single property, and the damage that would result because of it. In addition, no one obtained an easement for leaving the sewers as is, and no one has attempted • to maintain or control this water in any manner what-so-ever. Continued on Page 2 • Letter to Mr. Gene Dietz, April 14, Page 2 There are currently three problems which Brad and I discussed with you on April 1, and which remain independent, individual problems, and which must be addressed individually. These are again listed below: 1. Inadequate Street Drains. The current drains in Gordon Drive do not accommodate the amount of water that collects near them. As a result, there is often an overflow onto our property from the street. 2. Damage to our side yard. As a result of Problem 1, our side yard has been eroded and severely damaged. The entire side yard, from the street to the drain opening in the back, has sunken and eroded. Note: It is our understanding that the City has agreed to fill/grade/seed-sod this area. However, this work has been put "on-hold"until Problems 1 and 3 are investigated and a complete solution has been determined. 3. Control/maintenance of the water leaving the pipes in our yard. There is currently no control of the water leaving the pipes from the street drains. As a result of the current location of where the pipe from Gordon Drive ends, the vast majority of our backyard has become unuseable, as the water has created a variety of courses which it has fashioned over the years. As Brad and I discussed with you on April 1. a possible solution to Problem 3 would be to fill our back yard. We then discussed the possibility of the City extending the current pipe to the end of this hypothetically filled area. However, without knowing if or how much of our yard can be filled, it is impossible to predetermine if this would solve Problem 3. Perhaps, if enough of our property could be filled, simply extending the current pipe to the back of it would solve everything. However, simply adding an additional 10 or 20 feet to the current pipe, without the creation of a swale and/or containment area, would not be adequate. Clearly, more discussion is needed regarding this proposed solution. In any case, in the event that filling is not a possibility, we would still need to investigate what other alternatives exist to solving Problem 3. Brad and I would appreciate the City of Eden Prairie continuing its role by proposing alternative solutions. As we have stated on prior occasions, simply leaving our backyard as is. is not acceptable. We must work toward a solution. It is my understanding that we will wait until the end of May, to receive a final word regarding the wetlands/fill/mitigation issue- Until then, Brad and I will continue to investigate what other alternatives might be appropriate, and would ask that the City do the same. Brad and I appreciate your attention ro this very serious problem. By continuing to work t, gether, we will fi • A,cost-effective solution. Sin erel / \ (I / 7 • ( 61,L° April 15, 1993 • • Mr. Gene Dietz, Director Public Works, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Dietz: Upon further investigation of the area marked by Barr engineering considered to be "wetlands", it is interesting to note that only the area which has been sunken, eroded and deteriorated by the water flowing out of the pipe outlets from Gordon Drive and underneath the park, has been marked. While it is true that the ending of the grass in the backyard is one boundary, this is because the outlet of the pipe from Gordon Drive does not currently extend beyond our grass, but has rather destroyed whatever grass used to be on the side of the yard, and then has made a series of riverbed- formations into our back yard. [We had planned to increase the grassy area of our back yard, but any attempts to do so under the current conditions would result in its immediate destruction from the force and amount of the water leaving the pipes. Until the water problem is resolved, therefore, we are unable to do anything with our backyard.] It should be noted that a portion of the back of our property (bordering the highway) has not been marked as wetland, as this area has been spared much of the deterioration and erosion from the gallons of water directed onto our property each year. • It is obvious, that the same type of damage which has occurred on the side of our yard (including grade destruction, erosion and sunken ground) from the amount of water which flows over our property because of the inadequacy of the street drains, is but a fraction of the damage that has resulted from the gallons of water which have been collected and dumped directly into our back yard. It is becoming quite clear that regardless of the designation placed onto our property by Barr engineering, the City of Eden Prairie is responsible for the damage in our back yard caused by this water, and some amount of filling to repair the damaged area (i.e. refill the "riverbeds", fill in the sunken spots, repair the erosion) is essential. May will mark the twentieth month of our discovery and subsequent combating of this problem. You can imagine our frustration at facing another spring thaw and losing another precious year of not being able to enjoy or plan for our property because of the magnitude and frequency of this problem. Our only consolation is the belief that this will be the last year that this problem will exist. It should be noted that the size of this lot played a very important role in our decision to purchase this home. As a home-school teacher for our children, I needed a large area for recreational and learning activities. Also, due to our children's and Brad's allergies, we were careful to choose an area that was not adjacent to a pond or swamp_ as close proximity to these have caused reactions. We will look forwa to meeting with you in fay to determine whatever corrective action will be ecessary to r solve this roblem. Thank you :or your attention to this very important matter. Si cerel 4111/ B erly J. A o VS_ fr ,/-/ q • eil5 .. City of Eden Prairie O;ty Offices Ede 40Executive Drive •• Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 •• Telephone (612) 937 2262 . ., • , •.. • . • : . - pram ji May 3, 1993 Ms. Beverly J. Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dear Ms. Aho: I am in receipt of your letters dated April 1, 2, 5, 14 and 15, 1993. During phone conversations, I had promised a written response to these letters. However, I now believe that it would be more appropriate to wait until the wetland delineation by Barr Engineering has been completed. The results of that • investigation will certainly be required in order to respond to several of the issues you raised in your letters as well as a realistic evaluation of any alternatives for the problem. Our most recent conversation with Barr Engineering is that a person is scheduled to revisit the site during the week of May 17. After that work task has been completed, I intend to formally respond to your letters. 1 Sincere! , 1 •44dir- Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. Director of Public Works EAD:ssa Dsk.GD.AHO • .. �Ii / 9 //// — 3 Recycled Paper May 6, 1993 • Mr. Gene Dietz, Director Public Works, City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Dietz: I am in receipt of your letter of May 3 to my wife, in which you stated: "I am in receipt of your letters dated April 1, 2, 5, 14 and 15, 1993. During phone conversations, I had promised a written response to these letters. However, I now believe that it would be more appropriate to wait until the wetland delineation by Barr Engineering has been completed." I find your inaction and breach of promise to respond to these five letters, many of which contained very specific requests for information, very disturbing. My wife and I have spent numerous hours trying to research this situation and document our concerns to you. We have asked you for very specific information which would help lead us to and research various alternative solutions. I find absolutely no excuse for not responding to any of the issues raised in any of our letters, either directly or indirectly by another member of your department. In addition to questions raised regarding the wetland delineation and possible actions, there are issues needing response which have nothing to do with the delineation of wetlands. During our • meeting with you, it was my understanding that you believed one of the problems blocking action on the City's part to fix the problem the City has created in our back yard, was because "other residents in the city have the same problem" and that somehow correcting the mistake made in our yard would force the City to fix the other areas as well. First, I certainly would agree that if the City has made the same mistakes in other people's yards as it has in ours, that it is obliged to correct the problem. However, when we directly asked you for the names and addresses of other residents in the City whose problem is the same as ours, you did not respond. In our letter of April 2, we again asked for this information. Again, no response. This attitude seemed to permeate through our meeting with you as well. It seemed as though every suggestion we made during our meeting, was met with an almost instantaneous reason why it wouldn't work. It was as if you did not want to work with us to correct this problem, as if you did not want to invest any manpower or money toward our situation or finding a solution. For example, at our suggestion of a pump, you immediately stated that the cost would be prohibitive, costing approximately $200,000. Further investigation has led us to believe that this estimate was off by two orders of magnitude. When we suggested a containment area(s) of some type that could utilize evaporation for elimination, you immediately stated that"evaporation could never keep up with the amount of rainfall." Perhaps you are an extremely talented engineer, able to make these calculations and formulate these predictions instantaneously. I am an engineer, too, Mr. Dietz, and only after spending time researching various materials (with which the containment area could be lined), calculating the amount of average rainfall, and generating a software program to calculate various shapes and sizes of a containment area(s), (since evaporation is a function of surface area- per sq ft per degree), was I able to prove that this is a viable solution. Also, at our suggestion that the City must work with us to alleviate the problem it has created, you raised the aforementioned objection that this practice was actually "common" in Eden Prairie and that since there are others with the same problem, you felt no obligation to fix it. _ //-/6- 9 3 4 o Page 2, Letter to Mr. Gene Dietz, May 6 0 We did not visit you on a whim, Mr. Dietz. My time is far too valuable for that, as I know is yours. My family has suffered with this problem for nearly two years, and we have discussed and researched it (at our expense) with a variety of talented, skilled engineers. I deserved a better"ear" during this meeting. I deserved some time allocated to this problem by the City, and my wife and I certainly deserved to have a response to each of our letters. I want to know the names and addresses of the other residents in Eden Prairie, who live in neighborhood community in a non-DNR wetlands area, whose property is currently being used by the City to direct and dump acres of run-off, and for which the City has not obtained an easement. If further investigation has led to the conclusion that there are no other residents in a situation like ours, then I would like you to state this as well. Also, during our meeting, you stated that a safety grate of some fashion (I believe you said it was a rod) had been placed at the end of the pipe outlet in our yard. We stated that we did not believe this was the case. Again, you were "sure" we were wrong. Well, Mr. Dietz, I invite you to look at the pipe outlet in our back yard. Eighteen months after our initial complaint, it is still exposed and open. This is a breach of safety code regulations. We were not able to discern if the pipe outlet from the park is grated, since it was under water at the time. Perhaps your department would like to recheck it, as well. Lastly, I find your conclusion to your letter of May 3, very unsettling. It_is almost as if you are planning to take no action. You stated that "after that work task has been completed, I intend to 410 formally respond to your letters." I would have assumed that after this work (by BARR) has been completed, you would want to set up some meeting times, in which we and your engineering staff can go over the results and discuss the best course of action. In fact, in my wife's last letter (April 15), she stated that "we will look forward to meeting with you in May to determine whatever corrective action will be necessary to resolve this problem." Again, you totally ignored her recommendation. Have you already planned to not meet with us, or am I misreading your intent of this letter? If you are not willing nor able to work with us to resolve (fix, correct, improve) this issue, please let me know immediately. We deserve to know where we stand. If we need to go on to the next level of authority, we certainly want to begin that process immediately. There has already been too much time lost, and too much damage to let this go on into the summer. I feel that for the past eighteen months, we have been very patient, courteous, cooperative and willing to work with the City to resolve this issue. I would very much appreciate a response to the questions raised in this letter as soon as possible. As these questions have nothing to do with the delineation of our yard by BARR Engineering, I see no reason why we should have to wait two weeks for a response. Also, I am formally requesting to meet with you as soon as BARR has completed their study, the week of May 17, to discuss whatever corrective action will be necessary. I would suggest that we meet at our residence, so we can evaluate alternatives and actually walk over the property. Please include your earliest convenient meeting time in your response. Thank you. Sincerely, adford S. h 12742 Gordo Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 612/944-7055 -`2/ id c / / • City of Eden Prairie ecIrr City Offices pram, 7600 Executive Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612)937-2262 Office of the Mayor Douglas B. Tenpas June 4, 1993 Bradford S. & Beverly J. Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Aho: Thank you for your letter of June 2, 1993 . I, or a member of the City staff, will respond to your concerns as soon as possible. Letters I receive from residents of Eden Prairie help me keep a better pulse on what is happening in our -City. In a community which has been growing as rapidly as ours, it is difficult to help solve problems until we know they exist. That is why letters, such as yours, are so important. Please do not hesitate to contact me or the City staff in the future if you have other concerns. Sincerely, Douglas B. Tenpas Mayor of Eden Prairie DBT:jdp 3 .211 / 02-e) Recycled Racef • • June 2, 1993 The Honorable Mayor Douglas Tenpas Eden Prairie, Minnesota Dear Mr. Mayor: As new residents of Eden Prairie, it is with regret that our first correspondence with you has been forced by a matter which we feel requires your personal attention. We have a severe problem with the disposal of storm sewage currently directed onto our property, which is not controlled, maintained, nor contained in any manner. It is simply left to meander through our yard, stagnate, be absorbed into the ground or evaporate. In September of 1991, after living in this home for one month, we recognized the existence and severity of the storm sewage problem with the autumn rains. Until that time, we had no knowledge of the existence of this sewage problem, as Eden Prairie never obtained an easement. We located the sources of the problem to at least two storm sewage pipes coming from street drains, one which opens onto our property, and the other which opens onto the adjacent (park) property, but is directed into our yard. We immediately contacted Gene Dietz, the Director of Public Works, to alert him of this situation. We were naive in believing that once • notified,-he would be willing and interested in working with us toward a cost effective, viable solution. However, we are disheartened to inform you that after 21 months of researching and formulating probable resolutions, Mr. Dietz has told us that he has no intention of correcting this situation. We feel we must now solicit your intervention into this matter. Our complaint stems from two main factors. First, is the tremendous volume of water being directed to and concentrated on our property. From City maps, it is estimated that our property is being used to store the runoff from between 12 to 20 acres of the surrounding neighborhood area. Erosion and deterioration of our yard is substantial. The use of our property is severely limited, unpredictable and altered on an almost daily basis. (The fort the children built on dry ground yesterday, has its base underwater today, etc.) The changes in this water, which ranges from none to various pockets of varying levels, pose a real threat of injury. (A pool of water which did not exist yesterday, is deep enough to drown a child today.) Our property borders a City park, and the number of children playing in our yard is not limited to our own. Secondly, and most important, due to this tremendous volume of water, the concentration of contaminants in our yard is greater than would normally occur. We have a grave concern that this creates a very real health risk for our three children and their playmates. The Minnesota Department of Health has visited our property and has indicated that the types of contaminants found in storm sewage and on our property most likely include, but are not limited to, petroleum products, heavy metals, asphalt, fertilizing agents, weed killing-controlling agents, and others. They also confirmed our fears that chemicals existing "normally" in concentrations • of parts per billion, could easily be concentrated to levels of parts per million, or even parts per hundred-thousand on our property, due to the amount of storm sewage over the years. From the discoloration of the surface water on our property at the time of the visit, there was /0413 , - 3 2 concern as to the growth of bacteria and algae existing in the stagnant water. Mosquito breeding, allergic reactions and other problems are increased by this type of varying water. • An additional complication to this situation, is that our son suffers from Tourette Syndrome, a genetic, neurological disorder. Prior to moving to Eden Prairie, we had no knowledge, nor indication, that our son suffered from this. After moving here, the symptoms became apparent, and so began a 15-month medical process to determine the cause of Austin's problems. Unfortunately, much of the progress and prognosis of Tourette Syndrome is yet unknown. While some victims have relatively minor symptoms, others suffer from life-debilitating ones. We have been informed that exposure to certain chemicals causes adverse affects in victims of Tourette Syndrome. - Although Austin was born with this disease, he displayed no symptoms prior to moving here; we are concerned that exposure to the multitude of toxins in the soil and standing water on our property may be causing an adverse reaction in his case. Furthermore, whereas a "normal" child can withstand concentrations of certain chemicals (although long-range affects of these are still unknown), it is clear that children suffering from neurological disorders are more readily adversely affected. Based on the opinions of those in the MN Dept. of Health and Pollution Control Agency, we believe that if the water is diverted from our property, (for which we have had an engineer and developer recommend a feasible, cost-effective solution), and have the contaminated area buried and planted with a ground-cover, that the affects of these toxins will be greatly diminished or completely removed. • We presented this to Gene Dietz, but he was unwilling to consider this proposal. He stated that since Eden Prairie had been dumping this sewage onto this property for a number of years, they now have a "right" to continue to do so. Although we understand some of the legal grounds involving adverse possession, it appears to us that it was never the intent of this law to enable the abuse of another's property. Clearly, the nuisance law and others have been written to counter-act such affects. We also believe that simply because someone has done something "wrong" for a long time, it does not make it "right" to continue to do so. In plain language, we feel it is "wrong" to dump contaminated sewage onto an individual's property, or to cause the erosion and destruction of another's property. To do so under the di"sclosure of an easement, when there are no other alternatives, no objections, and no ill effects, is one thing. To continue to do so when no legal easement was obtained, under repeated objections, when cost-effective solutions are available, and a health risk is involved, is to us, seemingly negligent. Perhaps when this storm sewer system was initially designed, the engineers did not have the knowledge or tools necessary to design a better system. Or perhaps other developments changed the way the original system was to work. For example, we know that when the City built the park that borders our south, that property was filled, thereby decreasing the area for this storm sewage to our property, alone. In any event, it is now 1993, and we no longer need to be limited by the technologies and practices of earlier years. We now have the capability of resolving these issues, for all future generations. Mr. Mayor, as shown in the enclosed drawing, we are proposing that the City simply extend the pipe that now ends and empties in the middle of our property line, to the back of our • property. We also propose that the City dig a ditch on the border of our property and I-494, 3 • between the outlet of this extended pipe and the existing culvert which goes under I-494 into the wetlands area east of the highway. In doing so, the City could also ensure that the sewage emptying from the pipe underneath the park, is directed into this ditch as well. The dirt removed to make this ditch could possibly be used to bury the contaminated soils on our property, eliminating the need for, and expense of, hauling the dirt away. We have been told that if the water level becomes high enough, the water will flow into the culvert and be discharged in the wetlands. However, during times of lower rainfall, the water would be contained in this ditch. By keeping the water off of our backyard, the pollutants would not pose a threat to our children, nor would our property sustain damage. The solution to this problem is so simple, that we were astounded at the unwillingness of Mr. Dietz to consider it. Rather, he agreed to extend the pipe an additional 50 or so feet, if and only if we first incur the expense of filling a small portion of our property and create a wetlands area in the back, where once again the sewage would be allowed to collect, concentrate and stagnate. We explained that this would not solve the problem but only move it to another area of our property, and that our financial situation makes it unfeasible in any event. He then suggested that we move. He ended our last meeting on May 28, with a photo- copy of a portion of a litigation case brought against Eden Prairie, for an unknown reason by an unknown party, in which he stated Eden Prairie had prevailed. Whether this was an attempt to intimidate us against pursuing this matter further, or was simply his justification for doing nothing, is unclear to us. Our only desire has been to find the most cost-effective, viable solution to the problem with the storm sewage on our property. We believed that working with the City was the way to 411111 achieve this, and not through the court system. However, we have been informed by the State Attorney General's Office of several case law situations like ours, which have been judged in favor of the individual property owner. As a single family, we feel overwhelmed and insignificant compared to an entire City the size of Eden Prairie. Unfortunately, this problem can only be corrected by action on the part of the City. As parents, and particularly as parents of a disabled child, we are bound to do whatever is necessary to ensure each of them the best possible quality of life. Mr. Mayor, the cost of correcting this situation is minor; the risk to our children of not correcting it, is substantial. We would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss this situation in greater detail. We invite you to our home, where we can personally show you the affects of this storm sewage, discuss the enclosed solution and other facets of this situation, and any suggestions you may have. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sin rely, st Bradford S. and Beverly J. Aho 12742 Gordon Drive, Eden Prairie 55346 612/944-7055 IIEnclosure r.C -__I- '11----%_ rr...C.:; 12) /„..—.....e..—.1Npl_,...% . ' ]B 11 FIELD & NOWAK [0..1-? -1 c://, AI —-.......) SURVEYORS P . DESCRIPTION: / \ �— • 7415 WAYZATA BLVD. fit 1A MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA � Lot II , Block I , �` Wig VII* , Topview Acres 3rd .to \,.." .- -..." -1 Addition. SURVEY FOR : Wal -Don :uilders �-' ,� 112744 , -.s I /. - -- M a • ;,,�y�E/. B74.79 /. BSB.S9 $'c.'/e :/ °SO p E1. 8 7 9 J 9 `' �i 322.84 • � �—' Li.6 1 N \ 1 .mil Qc o "�' I rEl. 875199 ,43 °`� CIS Q a 16 E/. 865 09 �Z 28 �.- , �; o �, 1 V I \o, 1 %, ! .....1 uA rrk \ �: q U.C\ :N • ♦ i.� . . i d \ CO O 'o °' ..F.1 6 \� m L- '-' I A. w O1�J O ` c \ -4i c. O E/. 877.92 fie; `o— —r E� 866.29 d to \ r -� -� 38.9 ; _ -- - " • O �� {�1 `� 1 tea_ I % ��• C�v(.� L' Ca fr Proposed basement f Ioor , ,�; ; ,, '-�.;.,�,� eIevation = 813.= ,; � �- �2 -�•_ Z. --1 a 'Pz .v _ _ \ /. 8se z; We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of rvey of he boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this Isth day of March , 1974 . E G A N' , FIELD & N 0 W A K, INC. ; !- 811 y ) !1 — n ,. . . . ) ryeor, . ,4. I 1 v o a 9 � h • Fi � � n. 1�55 Rnnl p n 999 City of Eden Prairie EPECJErT: ry Offices _ primirim 00 Executive Drive• Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 •Telephone (612) 937-2262 TDD (612) 937-8703 June 4, 1993 Brad and Beverly Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Aho: The purpose of this letter is to provide a written response to your letters of April 1, 2, 5, 14, 15, and May 6, as well as summarize the City's position on the drainage issues on your property as discussed at our meeting on May 28, 1993. To summarize first, my position is that a condition exists on your property that was created with the full knowledge of all the parties involved in approximately 1963. The storm sewers from the Topview Acres Subdivision were directed to what was shown on the plat as "low land". My opinion is that these low lying areas were always wetlands and that the storm sewers were constructed to the • edge of these areas for discharge. The ability to encroach upon these wetland areas has always been rather flexible until recently, when both the federal and state governments have imposed much stricter regulation on these types of lands. Your home was constructed in 1974 and the original owner did not choose to develop much of the lot into turfed area. We have now been advised by Barr Engineering that much of the area east of your lawn is in fact designated as a wetland and the current regulations would require mitigation in order to do any filling. As we noted at our meeting, there is an area of higher ground near the I-494 right-of-way that is not classified as wetlands according to the Barr delineation. I believe that the regulations would permit that high ground (estimated to be 5,000 to 10,000 square feet) to be utilized as a mitigation site for filling the wetland near your home. If you would choose to pursue this as a potential solution, the following criteria would apply: • Until January 1, 1994, wetland mitigation can be performed at a 1:1 ratio. After January 1, it is my belief that the mitigation ratio would be 2:1. • The cost of moving the earth and additional fill to create a larger back yard as well as the restoration of the wetland area would not be shared by the City of Eden Prairie. • If, however, you choose to pursue this mitigation project, the City of Eden Prairie would pay the cost to extend the culvert along your side lot line to the edge of the proposed fill placement. • City staff would prepare the documentation, drawings/sketches and do the permit application • work with the Watershed District to allow this work to proceed. n Recycled Paper .� if-/i-?3 ,;� o`-7 Mr. and Mrs. Brad Aho June 4, 1993 Page2of4 If you choose to pursue this mitigation effort further, you should know that there is always a slight possibility that some hidden factor could surface that would cause some difficulty. However, I am not aware of any issues that would preclude this type of project. In chronological order, I will attempt to respond to some of the issues that were raised in each of your letters and tie it back to the proposal listed above. Much of the response to these letters have been discussed, but as I promised, a written response for the record is appropriate. April 1. 1993 letter: Your information is correct, your property is not in the flood plain nor is it a DNR regulated wetland. However, the DNR letter that you attached does indicate that it is rely to be a wetland of the type regulated by the Corps of Engineers. You are also correct that an easement does not exist over this wetland area. I gave you a copy of an order regarding an inverse condemnation case that the City has pending with Interstate Diesel. This gives some discussion regarding statute of limitations and who is entitled to be compensated for damages if a taking occurs. As we discussed, it is the City's position that the decision that was made 30 years ago to design the drainage system for this subdivision was adequate and that we believe we have developed rights to maintain the system as constructed. There is some erosion near the end of the pipe and if the decision is not to pursue the mitigation effort, the City will be responsible for adding material, regrading and seeding that area near the end of the pipe. The bare spots adjacent to your home do not appear to be erosion issues,but rather I discussed with you the idea of you adding shady mixture 40 grass seed to these spots. The fact that there is some erosion near the end of the pipe that has had no care for a 30-year time frame is not terribly surprising and it is my opinion that no additional work in the street would be cost effective. Finally, Bob Obermeyer at Barr Engineering could probably give you the best listing of statute references to their authority to review wetland intrusions and mitigation. Attachment to April 1. 1993 letter: Problems one and two as stated in your summary talks about the drainage from the street. As we discussed, I was able to find in the project file a note that indicates the storm sewer was designed for a ten-year frequency rainfall. That is still the standard for the City of Eden Prairie and it is to be expected that higher intensity rainstorms would exceed the capacity of the storm drains. My observation is that most of the erosion has happened near the end of the pipe and depending on your reaction to the proposed mitigation issue, we can work on that erosion problem separately or in concert with the enlargement of your yard into the wetland area. The third problem that you note is the concept of the storm drains emptying into the wetland on your property. That issue is addressed above and it is my opinion that the most practical and feasible solution to the problem is outlined in a filling and mitigation effort. The pipe that discharges along your side lot line is at an elevation of 855.9, while the culvert under I-494 is at 855.5. This differential in elevation would not lend itself to a drainage swale or an enclosed pipe without additional fill. That solution, of course, is impractical due to the wetland regulations that we have discussed. I believe that "drying up" the area would also be a form of wetland intrusion that would not be permitted without appropriate mitigation -- such as using a sensor driven pump to keep the area dry. As we have discussed, surface water is one of the ingredients that make this low land a wetland. To take one of the ingredients away would still result in the loss of a wetland area, which 41) would require mitigation. Mr. and Mrs. Brad Aho June 4, 1993 • Page3of4 • April 2. 1993 letter: It is not the opinion of the Public Works Department or any of our staff that the drainage system was poorly designed. We do agree that projects coming through the review process currently would result in easements over the wetland area both for drainage purposes and for wetland protection. However, the practices that occurred in 1963 appear to be reasonable,were agreed upon by all parties at the time, and we believe that the City has developed rights to maintain the system as it exists. I would not concur that this wetland area constitutes a dangerous health hazard, but I can understand that those conditions may not be compatible with the health needs of your family. It is almost a certainty that some wetland will exist on your property even after a mitigation effort might be pursued as described above. This issue appears to be beyond the control of the City of Eden Prairie. Finally, I do not believe that it would be a productive use of staff time to do a file search and field search to locate other situations similar to the one that exists on your property. While I am always concerned about precedent setting maintenance on private property, in the final analysis, the decision not to participate in a property reconfiguration for an issue that has existed for 30 years is the only practical solution for the City take. The research would not influence the final decision. April 5. 1993 letter: This letter deals with a pumping station alternative and the ability to perform work on the property. It is my opinion that a pumping station is not a viable alternative to the issues at hand. I frankly don't recall the discussion on April 1 well enough to know where the $200,000 • figure came from. However, this might have been a reference to the cost to construct and maintain a sanitary sewer lift station (which would be similar). A sanitary sewer lift station costs approximately $65,000 or $70,000 to construct and the present worth value of maintenance for the life of the station is estimated at approximately $75,000. This would put it in the order of magnitude as we might have discussed. The issue of a swale is discussed above and I would concur that technology does exist to take equipment into these types of areas. April 14. 1993 letter: Since this letter, Barr Engineering has had an opportunity to re-evaluate the limits of the wetland and it appears that very little (if any) change was made in their staked limits. By a copy of the 1963 plat that I gave you, it is my contention that the area under consideration was in fact always a wetland and that the primary thing that has changed in the last 30 years is the desire on the part of federal and state agencies to "save" these types of areas. I would not argue the merit of that position, but it is a primary factor in dealing with this issue. Other elements of this letter are addressed above. April 15. 1993 letter: As we discussed on May 28, I don't believe that the water has caused your property to sink. I would assume that there is some amount of sediment that has found its way to the area over the past 30 years, but when the project was designed, no particular work was done in the low land. In fact, it appears that the design proposed to bring the storm drains to the edge of the low land for discharge. I very much doubt that any grading was done in that area at all. In all probability there has been some changes over the past 30 years, but for the most part the topography probably remains much like it was when the project was created. The fact that the ground is low compared to surrounding property and has undulations in it that cause intermittent storage of water combined with the soil type is what creates the wetland effect -- during certain times of the year //-/I-9 3 • .• r • y_ yw >. , r • Mr. and Mrs. Brad Aho June 4, 1993 Page 4 of 4 • water stands at or slightly above ground level and with the given soil types allows certain vegetation to grow. This information is explained much more thoroughly and with more clarity in the brochure that I sent you on May 6, 1993. May 6. 1993 letter: Most of the issues raised in this letter tend to reiterate some of the previously stated concerns along with the frustration you feel regarding the problem. However, when the final decision whether or not to pursue the wetland filling and resulting mitigation is made or if we only come in to repair the erosion at the end of the pipe, we can in fact put a metal rod through the pipe to perform the work that I promised and thought had been accomplished. In summary, the City's position is stated at the beginning of this letter. While I realize that this isn't the solution that you had hoped for, I do believe that you are fortunate to have the ability to do wetland mitigation within your property which makes a solution possible -- if not fully desirable on the part of everyone involved. At our last meeting, I think that we both agree that we understand each others perspective on the issue, but the solution is fairly expensive and does not provide for a full elimination of the wetland on your property. If you do wish to pursue the filling and mitigation project, we will do our best to help you through the process, which I do believe would be beneficial to your property. If you choose not to pursue that course of action,we will schedule the repair work around the end of the culvert as soon as we can, but it will likely be toward the end of July before it can be completed. • Let me know of your decision. S • ind G Eugene A. Dietz, P.E. Director of Public Works EAD:ssa cc: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager Dsk.GD.AHO-2 • //—/6-93 4 30 • June 7, 1993 Mayor Douglas Tenpas Eden Prairie, Minnesota Dear Mr. Mayor: Thank you for your prompt notice of receipt of our letter of June 2, 1993. We are looking forward to working with you to find a cost-effective, viable solution to the storm sewer discharge problem in our backyard. We also received a response from Gene Dietz today, dated June 4, in which you were copied. As stated in our earlier letter to you, and as we informed Mr. Dietz during our discussions with him, we are unsatisfied with and disappointed in the "solution" offered in his letter. We feel we must also respond to and document several points found in Mr. Dietz's letter, as well as situations encountered during the 21 month process of dealing with this problem. We have hesitated to do this in the past, as we have not wanted to divert any time or energy away from finding an appropriate solution. However, the misinformation we have received from Mr. Dietz during our brief residence in Eden Prairie, and his failure to fully disclose information, • have exacerbated this situation. We certainly hope this was the action of a single individual, and not representative of the City of Eden Prairie. In retrospect, it is clear that Mr. Dietz has not been interested in working with us to find a cost effective, viable solution from the onset; our letter documenting these items in their entirety will be forthcoming. Our main concern remains in finding an appropriate solution to this problem. As Mr. Dietz's letter of June 4 testifies, he has continued to neglect and disregard our concerns when he states that "the most practical and feasible solution to the problem is outlined in a filling and mitigation effort." During our numerous conversations with him, and throughout our correspondence, we stated that we cannot incur any cost associated with filling this property as part of a solution to this problem. As a single-income family, it is simply beyond our means. In our letter of April 14, we expressly requested that he consider alternative solutions which did not require filling, as those we had previously recommended. Clearly,Mr. Dietz knew in advance that his "solution" was neither practical nor feasible. It is very disturbing to note that, of all the suggestions and recommendations we discussed during our months of seeking a resolution, the only "solution" recommended in his letter, was the one which could not be implemented for financial reasons. Most importantly, as stated in our June 2 letter to you, his "solution" does not solve the problem at all, but merely moves it from one portion of our property onto another. While Mr. Dietz's suggestion is neither practical nor feasible, it is the most complex. BARR Engineering informed us today that the only time the Conservation Act is in effect, and for • which mitigation is required, are in cases of"draining wetlands and/or filling wetlands." I specifically asked Mr. Bob Obermeyer of BARR Engineering if re-routing the storm sewers to discharge in an area different from our property would involve "wetland mitigation" and/or the ._ a - _. — w. Citds jeu3w^F ;Y"ta sr. •r Conservation Act. His response was a clear "no"; the process required to have the pipe • extended and a ditch built to connect the outlet of the pipe to the inlet of the culvert (as described in our June 2 letter to you), did not involve wetlands nor mitigation issues, since they did not involve filling and/or draining wetlands. Mr. Dietz's opinion that using a pipe with a ditch or swale "would also be a form of wetland intrusion that would not be permitted without appropriate mitigation" appears to be unfounded and untrue. While he may be free to express his "opinion", as Director of Public Works and a Professional Engineer it should have been one based on the facts of the Minnesota Statute with which he needs to comply. Mr. Dietz's statement that the "differential in elevation would not lend itself to a drainage swale or an enclosed pipe without additional fill. . .[and is therefore] impractical due to the wetland regulations" is also untrue. As discussed with a developer, this elevation can be accomplished by raising the level of the current pipe on the side of our property(which is not a wetlands issue),to achieve the slope necessary for the pipe to be extended to our back property line. Also, a portion of our property which is adjacent to I-494, (borders I-494) has been designated by BARR as not being wetlands. Any filling required in this area, would not involve mitigation nor wetlands issues. We have had a developer estimate the cost of implementing this recommendation. In order for the pipe extension/ditch construction solution to be implemented, accurate elevations need to • be taken. If the side-yard pipe outlet is currently too low, it can be lifted on our front or side property (again, not a wetlands issue). Then, an extension can be added to the pipe to reach to • our property boundary on I-494. A ditch or swale can be dug to direct and contain the water between the pipe outlet and the culvert intake. This ditch can contain appropriate measures to allow for sedimentation and other pollution control/water quality issues. Lastly, another ditch can be dug from the pipe outlet on the park, or its pipe can also be extended, into this ditch as well. The total cost of this has been estimated to be less than $6,000. The prevention of future contamination and deterioration of the soil on our property by the above stated method will be acceptable to us and very much appreciated. Please note that this would offer a cost effective, permanent solution to this problem. We would like to discuss this with you next week, as your schedule allows. We would appreciate notification of an appointment time at your earliest convenience. Thank you again for your consideration. Since y, 9 Bradford S. and Beverly J. Aho 12742 Gordon Drive, Eden Prairie 55346 612/944-7055 June 8, 1993 2 • Mr. Gene Dietz, Director tiu L,7-P7 Public Works, City of Eden Prairie i r•t 10 �JR3 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 + 1T'', 0C • Dear Mr. Dietz: p.,_,`a ?5A• RIF • This letter is to inform you of our decision to your letter of June 4, as you requested. As we discussed with you on numerous occasions, your recommendation of a filling and mitigation effort is neither practical nor feasible for us. First, as we discussed during our meeting on May 28, our le financial situation prevents us from implementing this plan. Secondly, as we also discussed, this would not solve the problem, but merely move it from one portion of our property onto another. None of the problems we discussed, including the quantity and quality of water issues together with their associated health risks, deterioration (erosion) of property and street debris problems are resolved by your recommendation. We willcontinue to work toward a cost effective solution, through other channels. Since ely, v Bradford S. and Beverly J. Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 612/944-7055 cc: Mr. Douglas Tenpas, Mayor I //—/6 3 1�71.- 3 3 ; , x � � . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency yr lawimioviimisor . June 16, 1993 Ms. Bev Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Ms. Aho: Re: Storm Water Runoff-Complaint * . This is in response tJ your request that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) investigate some problems related to storm water runoff on your property. ' As you are aware, the MPCA does not normally have regulatory authority or programs regulating most residential storm water discharges. We currently issue permits only for discharges that have been given a high priority for our permit programs, including industrial dischargers, and storm water from the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Unless a source of pollutants with clear potential to impact waters of the state can be documented, there is very little likelihood that the MPCA would take a regulatory position with' regard to this property. However, we do have some comments with regard to your particular storm water runoff issues. At your request, I inspected the drainage patterns and problems related to your property on June 8, 1993. You indicated that your property abuts the right-of- way for Interstate 494 and that a city park borders your property. Drainage from houses, streets, as well as the park property and adjoining residential areas, drains via culverts and surface water runoff to what you indicated was essentially your back yard. Drainage from your yard leaves the property via a Minnesota Department of Transportation culvert which discharges under Interstate 494 to the East; in the vicinity of Bryant Lake. Drainage from these areas creates a wetland habitat in your yard which has been delineated by the Watershed District. My observation of the wetland area indicates that there are large trees that serve as a sound and visual barrier from the interstate. The wetland has been degraded by surface water runoff discharges from culverts which contain large amounts of sand, tree branches and other debris, which is deposited in the wetland area. The wetland, therefore, serves some functions from both pollution control and aesthetics. However, you object that these public functions are • served on your property. 411/ 3 ,8 3V • at least 10percent paper recycled Printed on recycled paper containingP Pbyconsumers. Y P PY \520 Lafayette Rd.;St.Paul,MN 55155-4194:(612)296-6300;Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester • Eaual Opportunity Employer•Printed on Recycled Paper 410 • Ms. Bev Aho Page 2 June 16, 1993 • Your primary concern about the wetland on your property related to potential health impacts that may be caused by concentration of pollutants coming from the area that delivers storm water runoff to the site. I observed the neighborhood to see if there would be any unusual or excessive sources of pollutants, and it was my observation that the contributing area consisted of normal residential development and that this site would be consistent with other residential discharge throughout the metropolitan area. Although there are contaminants contained in all storm water runoff, I am not aware of any adverse health - effects that are associated with normal residential areas. Reports have been prepared by the Hennepin County Conservation District (Draft), the Metropolitan . Council and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) . ,The city of Minneapolis and 'the Minneapolis Park Board have also coordinated studies which are related to this issue but I have not received the data for residential areas ,at this time. I have enclosed a summary of a study for the WDNR which analyzed storm water runoff from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. These reports indicate that there are potentially toxic materials in storm water runoff, but it does not provide any information indicating that these levels of contamination could potentially 411/ affect human health. You indicated that you have already contacted the Minnesota Department of Health regarding human health concerns and we both currently await the response of that agency. The area in question has always been a natural drainage area, and storm water from the vicinity has probably always drained through this property. However, the discharge has been affected by the installation of houses and roads which increase the impervious surface in the watershed, resulting in increased peak flows and total volume of runoff to the site. The runoff from the site has also been affected by the creation of Interstate 494, which separated the natural runoff of this site from Bryant Lake. You indicated that you would like to see a trench and pipe system installed at the rear of your property to more efficiently transport water to the Minnesota Department of Transportation culvert. It is your opinion that this would more effectively drain the area and prevent excessive flooding of the wetland area. There are a number of factors related to the feasibility 'of this proposal that I am not prepared to address. The effectiveness of trying to put a ditch at the back of your-property would depend on the elevations of the ditch, the Minnesota Department of Transportation culvert elevation and capacity, the elevation of your property, flow rates and other factors. If a ditch and pipe is installed, the responsibility for maintenance should be clearly defined. The city and/or the Minnesota Department of Transportation may be the appropriate agencies to maintain_ this system, and therefore, some kind of purchase or access should be provided. We suggest that the feasibility of this option be studied carefully 411/ prior' to implementing this proposal. 41111 • Hs. Bev Aho Page 3 June 16, 1993 • Your proposed option of installing a pipe to the back of the property and trenching a ditch to the Minnesota Department of Transportation culvert is a matter that we feel should be determined by you, the city, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. However, the wetland clearly serves some public functions for settling of solids and containing debris. If the trench solution is implemented, we would suggest that water quality benefits be maximized by measures such as the use of rock filter dikes or other measures that would be installed to collect sediment and debris prior to discharge to the Bryant Lake area. Another option that was discussed was the creation of a small sediment trap pond with a spreader device for overflow. This option was less acceptable to you since it would continue to allow water to go to your property. This would not solve problems with water volume or wet soil conditions, but it could provide an area where sediment and debris could be trapped and removed. We recommend that if a pond is created, it be placed on park land, or that an access be obtained so that the pond could be properly maintained., We sincerely hope that an agreeable solution can be reached by all parties. Our primary concern would be to support the Health Department on human health issues and secondarily, we are concerned that the area does serve some water quality functions. It is our hope that these water quality functions could be maintained or enhanced no matter what solution is decided upon. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (612) 296-9268. Users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf call (612) 297-5353. Sincerely, ouis L. F ynn Nonpoint Source Section Water Quality Division LLF:mbo • cc: The Honorable Douglas Tenpas, Mayor, City of Eden Prairie Larry Myers, Minnesota Department of Public Health Bob Obermeyer, Barr Engineering 4111 77. /67 ;} //`A - 93 • Table 1. Description of drainage areas for Wisconsin urban runoff monitoring sites. Site Type Area, % % % % % Traffic Site acres Res. Comm. Parks Perv. Conn. Volume, Imperv. car/day Woodcenter Pipe 44.9 20 80 0 19 73 8100 (413631) (1). Hastings Pipe 32.8 100 0 0 48 30 250 (413632) Noyes Cr. (2) Cr. 1341 48 8 27 65 28 2865 (413011) Underwood Cr. Cr. 12831 57 8 21 72 7 NA (413007) Monroe St. Pipe 238 87 3. 10 - 66 26 2006 (133332) 1) STORET numbers. 2) Channelized tributary with baseflows less than 1 cubic foot per second. NA = data not available PECEVED MAR 1 9 1991 M. P C. A. Water Quality Div. • �� ,� 7 • Table 2. Most frequently detected pollutants in Wisconsin urban runoff samples - pollutants observed above detection levels in at at least 10 percent of the samples. (1) 111, Percent Metals Polycyclic Aromatic Pesticides Occurence and Hydrocarbons; Inorcranics Phthalates & PCBs 75-100 *Zinc(100) Benzo(A) Pyrene(98) Diazinon(82) - . *Nickel (98) *Lead(98) . *Copper(98) *Chromium(98) *Arsenic(81) 50-74 *Antimony(51) 2 ,4-D(67) Atrazine(59) Dicamba(56) Alachlor(52) 20-49 *Cadmium(43) *Bis (2-ethyl Malathion(49) • Mercury(34) hexal) Phthala:e(48) Methoxychlor(44) Silver(31) *Fluorarithene(31) IJDT(36) • Pyrene(23) DDE(33) .. DDD(28) *Chlordane(29) *Lindane(29) Metolachlor(26) Cyanazine(22) 10-19 *Cyanide(12) *Phenanthrene(19) Heptachlor 410 - Benzo(GHI) - epoxide(15) Perylene(12) • Heptachlor(15) *Chrysene(12) Aldrin(15) PCBs (17) Mirex(13) Toxaphene(13) Endrin(13) *Endosulfan(13) Dieldrin(13) PCNs(13) Perthane(13) 2, 4-DP(15) Prometone(13) 1) Measurable amounts of suspended solids, BOD, COD, Total Phosphorus, Soluble Phosphorus, Chloride, Nitrate plus Nitrite, and Fecal Coliform have also been observed at all the sites (REF- Menomonee and NUPP) . * Pollutants observed in stormwater from other cities monitored by NURP (REF) . ( ) = percent occurence. 410 _/6,-?3 // /3 3 y • • Table 3. Summary of event mean concentrations (EMCs) for metals and inorganic pollutants observed in at least 10 percent of the samples 4111 collected at Wisconsin urban runoff sites. Pollutant Woodcenter Monroe Noyes Underwood Hastings Number Samples Above Detection Levels (1) Zinc 19 14 9 13 9 Nickel 18 14 9 13 9 . Lead 19 13 . 9 13 - 9. Copper 19 13 9 13 9 Chromium 19 14 9 _ 13 9 Arsenic ' 17 10 8 12 8 Antimony 16 7 3 8 3 Cadmium 12 7 3 6 3 Mercury 9 6 3 4 3 Silver 18 1 0 1 1 Cyanide 5 1 1 1 1 Range of EMCs, ug/l (2) Zinc 120-1500 60-490 50-450 60-670 50-450 Nickel 3-52 3-43 4-25 3-36 4-25 Lead 13-570 3-160 12-150 12-340 12-150 Copper 4-210 5-55 3-99 12-140 . 3-99 Chromium 2-90 2-75 3-28 4-60 3-28 Arsenic 1-5 1-3 • 1-2 1-3 1-2 Antimony 1-4 1-2 1-2 1-3 1-2- Cadmium 1-7 1-2 1-2 1-9 1-2 Mercury 0.1-0.5 0.1-0.2 0.1-0. 01 0. 1-1.4 0.1-0.1 • Silver 1-52 1-1 <1-<1 4-4 4-4 Cyanide 20-90 10-10 20-20 20-20 20-20 Median of EMCs, u.7/1 Zinc 318 162 109 117 , 57 0 Nickel 10 9 8 8 3 Lead 112 26 28 32 13 Copper 45 14 18 24 8 . Chromium 17 9 7 10 3 Arsenic 1 1 <1 - 1 <1 Antimony 2 <1 <1 1 <1 Cadmium 1 <1 <1 1 <1 Mercury 0. 1 <0. 1 <0. 1 <0. 1 <0. 1 Silver 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 Cyanide 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 90th Percentile for EMCs , ua/1 (3) Zinc 864 443 312 295 139 - Nickel 31 29 19 18 7 Lead 438 186 95 115 33 Copper 165 42 78 52 16 Chromium 58 48 23 27 9 Arsenic 3 2 id 2 id Antimony 3 id id 2 id Cadmium 5 id id 5 id Mercury 0.3 id id id id Silver 35 id id ' id id Cyanide 50 id id id id 1) Total number of samples for Woodcenter, Monroe St. , Noyes Cr. , Underwood Cr. , and Hastings is 19, 14 , 9, 13 , and 9 respectively. 2) Range is from the value at or above the detection level to the maximum value. The minimum reported value for all the contituents is 1 ug/l, expect for zinc, mercury and cyanide (10, 0.1 and 10 ug/1 respectively) . 0 3) 'id equals insufficient data to determine 90th percentile. _ _/6,1 3 .7 _ /3 (n • Table 4 . Summary of event mean concentrations for organic . _ pollutants observed in at least 10 percent of the Wisconsin urban runoff samples. Pollutant # Samples Minimum Range, Median, 90th lip Above Reported ug/1 ug/1 Percent, Detection Values, (2) ug/1 (3) (1) uQ/1 Pesticides Perthane 7 0.100 1.0-1. 0 <1.0 id PCNs 7 0.100 1.0-1. 0 <0.10 . id Dieldrin 7 0.010 0.10-0.10 <0.010 id . Endosulfan 7 0.010 0.10-0. 10 <0.010 id Endrin 7 0.010 0.10-0. 10 <0.010 id Toxaphene 7 1.000 10.0-10.0 <1.0 id Mirex 7 0.010 0.10-0. 10 <0. 01 id Prometone 7 0.100 0.10-0.50 0.01 0.10 2,4-DP 8 0.010 0.05-1. 20 0. 006 0.20 Aldrin 8 0. 010 0.01-0.10 <0.01 id Heptachlor 8 0. 010 0.01-0. 10 <0.01 id Heptachl.orepox. 8 0.010 0.01-0. 10 <0. 01 id Cyanazine 12 0.100 0.10-1. 10 0.020 0.29 Metolacb.lor 14 0.100 0.10-0.70 0.05 0.29 ' Lindane _ 15 0.010 0.01-0.10 <0.010 id Chlordane 15 0.100 0.10-1. 0 0.03 0.47 DDD 15 0. 010 0.01-0. 10 0.003 0.05 DDE 17 0. 010 0.01-0. 10 0.003 0.05 6DT 19 0.010 0.01-0. 10 0. 006 0.06 Methoxychlor 23 0.010 0.01-0. 50 0.008 0.12 Malathion 26 0. 010 0.01-1. 1 0.005 0. 07 411 Alachlor 28 0. 100 0.10-2.9 0.090 0.90 Dicamba 31 0.010 0.03-0. 50 0.060 0.24 Atrazine 32 0. 100 0. 10-6.5 0.090 0.80 2,4-D 37 0. 010 0.1)-8 .5 0.70 4 .0 Diazinon 44 0.010 0.01-2.2 0.03 0.20 Polvcvclic Arcmatic Hydrocarbons Benzo(GHI) - Perylene 6 10. 00 10-30 2. 0 11 Chrysene 6 10.00 11-150 0.2 11 Phenanthrene 10 5. 00 5-250 0.2 9 Pyrene 12 5.00 8-190 1.3 19 Flouranthene 16 5.00 5-270 0.04 5 Benzo(A)Pyrene 53 0.10 0.10-45 1.20 8 Phthalate Bis(2-ethyl- hexal)Phthalate 25 5.00 5-150 4 30 PCBs PCBs- . 9 0. 100 0.10-10 . 0. 02 0. 61 1) Total number of samples for each pollutant ranged from 52 to 54. 2) Range is from minimum value above or at the detection level to maximum value. 3) id equals insufficient data to determine the 90th percentile. 411 • ri/ /,3 go . //-/Z'9 3 . Table 5. Summary of event mean concentrations (EMCs) for selected pollutants monitored at Woodcenter and Hastings from 1980 to 1932 0 and at the Wisconsin urban runoff sites between 1988 and 1990. Pollutant Woodcenter Monroe Noyes Underwood }fasting Total Number of Samples Susp.Solids (1) 83 76 NA(4) NA 60 Total P (2) 67 65 NA NA 48 Soluble .P (2) 62 56 NA NA 47 NO3+NO2 (2) 25 51 NA NA 33 COD (2) 57 63 NA NA 36 5 Day BOD (2) 51 NA NA NA 32 Chloride (2) 67 65 NA NA 48 Hardness (3) 12 16 7 10 12 Fecal Coli. (3) 12 11 4 8 9 Susp.Solids(3) 16 12 7 10 7 Rance of EMCs, me/1 (counts/100m1 x 101 Susp.Solids 21-1230 21-1660 NA NA 2-394 Total P . 09-.82 .16-1.70 NA NA . 10-.88 Soluble P . 019-.18 .03-1.22 NA NA .05-.41 NO3+NO2 . 18-2.80 .21-1.34 NA NA .20-1.28 COD 26-250 21-370 NA NA 16-160 5 Day BOD 5-34 NA , NA NA - 2-31 Chloride 1-2500 .8-3100 NA NA 1-240 Hardness 14-35 17-41 67-95 48-200 - 19-37 Fecal Coli. 60-5000 30-9600 180-3300 400-3600 110-6700 Susp.Solids 46-1230 62-1660 58-436 31-1670 23-260 Median of EMCs, mail (counts/100m1) Susp.Solids 161 165 NA NA 43 0 Total P 0.26 0.46 NA NA _ 0. 22 Soluble P 0.04 0. 13 NA NA 0. 11 NO3+NO2 0. 60 0.47 NA NA 0. 63 COD 85 76 NA NA 32 5 Day BOD 13 NA NA NA 6 Chloride 16 11 NA NA 8 Hardness 27 20 85 114 24 Fecal Coli. 4200 6400 5700 10300 8800 Susp.Solids 157 394 17£ 186 51 90th Percentile for EMCs, mg/1 (counts/100mi1 . Susp.Solids 494 697 NA NA 134 Total P 0.54 1.01 NA NA 0.40 Soluble P 0.08 0.36 NA NA 0.22 NO3+NO2 1.22 0.89 NA NA 1. 09 COD . 172 159 NA NA 60 5 Day BOD 27 NA NA NA 15 Chloride .95 130 NA NA 68 Hardness - 40 32 100 225 32 Fecal Coli. • 34200 72700 51400 40900 70400 Susp.So1ids 565 1872 585 1030 137 1) Values for Woodcenter and Hastings pooled from 1980-82 Milw. NURP and 1990 data, and Monroe St values are from 1988-1990 data. 2) Woodcenter and Hastings values from 1980-82 Milw. NURP data, and Monroe St. values are from 1988-90 data. 3) Values are from 1990. data at Wisconsin urban runoff sites. 40 4) NA = data not available. Table 6. Probability, %, of metal, inorganic pollutant, and bacteria event mean concentrations (counts/100m1) exceeding water411 quality criteria at Wisconsin urban runoff sites. (1) Pollutant Woodcenter Monroe Noyes Underwood Hastina Acute Toxicity Criteria - Warm Water Soortfish . Zinc 97 89 25 20 45 Lead 73 40 2 0 4 Copper 93 78 32 22 45 Silver 90 0 0 0 0 Cyanide 2 0 0 0 0 Groundwater Enforcement Standard Lead • 78 33 29 32 4 Chromium 18 10 3 4 0 Cadmium . 4 0 0 7 0 Silver 6 0 0 0 0 Chloride (2) ,.3 7 NA (3) NA 0 Fecal Coliform 100 100 100 100 100 Groundwater Preventive Action Limits Lead 100 83 96 94 86 Chromium 89 68 68 75 25 Cadmium 55 40 25 31 7410 Silver 32 0 0 0 0 Cyanide 4 0 0 0 0 Chloride (2) 10 * 12 NA NA 6 NO3-+-NO2 (2) 4 0 NA NA 0 Fecal Coliform 100 100 100 100 100 Effluent Limits (WPDES Permits) Susp. Solids 89 80 93 85 52 Total P 2 11 NA NA 3 BOD 8 NA NA NA 2 Surface Water Bacteria Guidelines Fecal Coliform 98 90 98 98 98 1) Pollutants from Table 2 not listed if no exceedences occured and/or no criteria were available. 2) Data for Woodcenter and Hastings was collected between 1980 and 1982 (REF) . 3) NA equals data not available. III // t. .--1 .7 • Table 7. Probability, %, of organic pollutant event mean concentrations exceeding water qualtiy criteria at Wisconsin 4. urban runoff sites. (1) Pollutant Surface Water Criteria Groundwater Criteria Acute Tox. Human Preventive Enforce. Criteria- Cancer Action Standards Warm Water Criteria Limits Sportfish Herbicides Atrazine NA (2) NA 20 0 Alachlor NA NA 60 19 Cyanazine NA NA 3 0 Insecticides DDT NA 93 NA NA Chlordane 15 0 NA NA Lindane (3) 0 0 (4) , 27 ; 15 Heptachlor (3) 0 15 NA NA Aldrin (3) 0 100 NA NA Toxaphene (3) 100 100 NA NA Endrin (3) 0 13 13 0 Malathion (5) 1 NA NA. NA • D?azin_on (6) 1 NA NA NA } PCBs PCBs NA 100 NA NA Polvcvclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Fluoranthene NA 8 (4) NA NA Benzo(A) Pyrene NA 96 NA NA Pyrene NA 82 NA NA Phenanthrene NA 60 NA NA Benzo(GHI) Perylene NA 98 NA NA Chrysene NA 60 NA NA 1) Pollutants from Table 2 not listed if no exeedences occured and/or no water quality criteria were available. 2) NA = no water quality criteria available. j -3) Percent based on ratio of observed exceedences to total number of samples. 4) Probability of exceedence based on Human Threshold Criteria. 5) Criteria not available, but EC50 48 hour acute toxicity level reported for Daphnia Magna is 1.0 ug/1 (REF) . 6) Criteria not available, but average EC50 48 hour acute toxicity level reported for Simocephalus Serrulatus is 1. 6 ug/l. III ,g , r) y3 • Table 8. Bioassay hits for Wisconsin urban runoff sites. (1) Site Date Mortality, % Test Organism at 24 hours Monroe St. 10/06/89 90 Ceriodaphnia dubia Noyes Cr. 03/10/90 95 Ceriodaphnia -dubia Woodcenter 06/15/90 100 Ceriodaphnia dubia Woodcenter 06/19/90 100 Ceriodaphnia dubia 75 Daphnia magna 1) Acute. bioassay test were completed for 51 composite runoff samples. The test organisms included Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia magna, and Fathead Minnows. • • • l/-/1 9 Table 9. Problem pollutants in Wisconsin runoff - event mean concentrations above detection in at least 10% of the samples and 1110 a water quality criteria was exceeded for at least one sample. Metals Polycyclic Pesticides Bacteria PCBs and Aromatic Inorganics Hydrocarbons ,Both Surface Water and Groundwater Ouality Criteria Exceeded Lead Endrin Fecal Silver S Coliform Cyanide Only Surface Water Quality Criteria Exceeded Zinc Benzo(A)Pyrene DDT PCBs Copper Fluoranthene Chlordane Pyrene Heptachlor Phenanthrene Aldrin Benzo(A) Perylene Toxaphene Chrysene Malathion • Dazincn • • Only Groundwater Quality Criteria Exceeded Chromium Lindane Cadmium Alachl,r NO3+NO2 Cyanazine I • Chloride Atraziae Only Effluent Limits (WPDES Per,nits) Exceeded Total P Susp. Sol. ` BOD • //-/4 -93 • Table 10. Trends in event mean concentrations (EMCs) from early 1980s to 1990 at Hasting and Woodcenter urban runoff sites - comparison of Milwaukee NURP and Wisconsin urban runoff results. Pollutant Woodcenter Hastings 1980-1982 1990 1980-1982 1990 • • Range of EMCs. ug/1 (1) Lead 160-2400 13-570 25-500 5-48 Zinc 10-1560 120-1500 10-1000 20-170 Copper NA 4-210 NA 5-55 Susp. Solids 21-764 46-1230 2-394 58-436 Median of EMCs, ugh]. (1) Lead 450 112 50 13 • Zinc 300 - 318 70 57 Copper 46 45 NA 8 • Susp. Solids 160 157 41 51 1) Suspended Solids in mg/l. • • , • /// j.5 '116 • Table 11. Summary of Total Phosphorus and Suspended Solids event • mean concentrations (EMCs) for two agricultural sites and a urban site in Wisconsin. • Pollutant Urban Agricultural (1) Monroe St Brewery Cr. Garfoot Cr. • Total Number of Samples Susp. Solids 76 ' 18 16 Total P 65 15 14 Rance of EMCs, ma/1 Susp. Solids 21-1660 47-1136 107-869 - . Total P • 0.16-1.70 0.51-2.29 0.71-1.52 Median of EMCs , ma/1 Susp. Solids 165 263 355 Total P 0.46 1.25 , 1.08 1) Agricultural sites are near the urban site and were monitored in 1984 and 1985 (REF) . • . • //-/t-93 1f /3 7 • • Table 6. Water quality criteria used to identify problem 411. pollutants at Wisconsin urban runoff sites. Surface Water Quality Criteria Acute Toxicity Criteria-Warm Water Sportfish: Maximum daily concentration not to be exceeded more than 'once every three years. Acute toxicity levels associated with 96hour LC 50 data. Source: Wisconsin Administrative Code; Chapter NR105. Human Threshold Criteria - Non-public Water Supply (Warm Water Sportfish Communities) : Maximum concentration to protect humans. from adversed effects of ingestion of aquatic organisms. Source: Wisconsin Administrative Code; Chapter NR105. Human Cancer Criteria - Non-public Water Supply (Warm Water Sportfish Communities) : Maximum concentration neded to protect human from risk of cancer from ingestion of aquatic organisms. Source: Wisconsin Administrative Code; Chapter 105. • Effluent Limits - WPDES Permits: All sewage treatment plants required to meet average weekly suspended solids concentration of 45 mg/1. A performance standard. Source: Wisconsin Adminstrative Code; Chapter NR 210 Total Phosphorus must not exceed 1 ppm for sewage treatment • plants discharging to the Great Lakes Basin. The standard is water quality based. 411 Source: Wisconsin Administrative Code; Chapter NR 102 . Groundwater Criteria Preventive Action Limit: WI Administrative Code; Chapter NR140 Enforcement Standard: WI Administrative Code; Chapter NR140. Bacteria Guidelines: Administrative Code; Chapter NR102 - i .' /// //-/6 -9 3 . , ,• • , • • • • • • ATRAZINE 7 • 6 • 5 • .• 1:7) • Z 4 • 0 •P. Z 3 LAJ • . . 0 2- 1- 0 .• CI IR' 0tyik0 • V4 0°1/- ER*1°°t) t1W -• 04° C 4/7 --.1411 3 , • 7. • • . . , . ..•••• •( • • • • • FECAL COLIFORM 100000 0 80000r a 1 -= i 0 60000- • ! t I •La S . CL 40000- 0 • •••••••heary 20000- E.' R t4 00D wiota0 iv4000.--CW t4CiftS-C '. IAP•511 S' 14 N t3140C • • • • , /3. • • �� .rq a �. , �� .. ,r• :- a tv *.", ex• µ- • • • • • • DIAZiNON ? ; 7 2.5 0 • 2— 1.5— Z O .- a . V 1— Z O G U 0.5— e ■ 1 0 0 Op_C� R"` Op_CK oES_CR` AS�N VJO 1.410t4�NpERWO r10 16 tt • •• • y _g/77-- " S� • •• • • • BENZO A PYRENE (LOW LEVEL) 50 0 40- r I � Y 30- Z Q • Z U 20- Z 0 U 0 10- 0 WOOD_C t110NUN� WpOD_CR, tAWES'CR� HASZIN - . c • • • 3 /// �Z- /-1 • • ZINC I I • • -0'" 1600 0 1400- 1200- • • •••• ••• Cr) 1000 0 • 800- 0 600- 0 4100- o 200- 0 u. ( • s-mkG5 14t, ' V40°°- -ock110 1401ES-CW Utta-1114° , • • , 13 r 3 3 F. • a; . . ......_ 1 , ID..6._.• Y._........rr. .Y. _' •Yf QD i • • ♦ .-.r. ............... ,. ._—__„. . ......_., ?^ O ., • til I I r ! I - h J ..._a.... „.a.._._.........._..... ...........s.l._..•_...... ..._.....__... 1�..._..s...w._... ._... O 1 1CO V I i I i- I.... ,, D N • . N V • • • alI J E L7 . O O r L ' . O C. • — c 1. • _.. .. _.__. _____`j_. o . U • O C. et Co o0 O 0 Co O O O O O •O r- O e- e- lw OOL/luno3 • . ... . . { -••••••• . ..•‘..„, , . MONROE STREET ADIENtION POND 1987-1988 • ' . 1 ---...... EAST MANHOLE cr, . . ... - SUSPENDED SOLIDS .... ~ _it. . 10000 , . 4 . . i .•.-.4. '•"' 4 i. 'ea, '• r-- •..i_. . .,..._,, .„. .,_, .. .. .. , • 1 k ' • 1.-.....--.....-..•-• .....----..-1 t . t, •d" i, • 1 ' t .,,.. I 1 1000 I I •Y• f=, 1 I _. g I . t 1 r- ' , , , . • , . .. , . i , 1- , i _ .... .. _, ? 1 1 . 1 I I I I 4 ,•••/ 0 1 I 4/11....*#.....'...°.1.'4......'''''.........'i • l• 1\ 100 I I , i L_ I <cc 1 4 I t . i ! ; •-- ..1 i 1-- e. . z MPDS - PERMIT REQUIREMENT . 45 mg/L ...____ _i1 I " I u..1 (..) . z • 1 .____ _ _i i • ! • : , i I I 1 i • 1 i I t .............................t . 6••06t 1 I . i 1 i I I I ' 1 . • 1 I 1 1 I 1 I . 1 1 I 1 il 1 I , I ' I 1 5 10 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 75 80 90 95 99, CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY ... . , . , ... ... - . . . , ......., ., . , . ATRANEZI (P39630) 0„..._ .. -,...„ • . . •, io . . 1 ENFORCEMENT STANDARD = 3 5 µg/L • • •;••• , . ,.. . . •. . • ...J._ I I • 1 . . . , I I 1 I li II I-1 i i ' 1 1 . - _ _ _ .._.. ....=.11= __........_......1 17 -J - --I I . . . —I . Cr) . .. , -'. t•••4 . I k I i • -, PREVENTIVE ACTION LIMIT = 0.35 µg/L 1 ... J I • P 1 1 : : I , : 11 i 1 . < . v 1 ' , CC I ti ill isi I /7271 I 1 1 1 1 , , (_) • Z I 1 . (...A 0 (-) 0.1 il _ • 1 . 1 1 I it 1 i I, I t . _ I , . i 1 i , . . , t ., 1 1 . 'Lll jilt 1'1. 11111 III • . i , 0.01 - I 1 5 10 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 75 80 90 95 99 CUMU VE PROBABILITY • • ' , „ ... ...... . . • . 0 :. .. -...„, . . . .: 1 •1 00 BENZO A PYRENE, LOW LEVEL (P34247) „ . ., ,. . ,.i.. . ........gl . ; •:••':•:-"-!;14 17 fr,3 foseZ . . . ; . 1 1----- _ • . I-- ——1 ----i• • - • , - • 1 0 •4°-la 1---' — 1---- ' . .. . .. -J .M. , . • Z F al 'e. . 0 , R cc< • 1 . . , i_ ......,_,_ . . fiff--1 1-- . .,._ ! ..., 0 o , , .• . . ,..., . ,.,. , . ,.._, , . .... • . . ,.... . . , _ HUMAN CANCER ,---. 0.1 gg/L • . ' - • f 7.,:..r .". 0.1 . 1 .. . . :--- • . :'. • J. . . . 001 -............ 1 5 • ' -- !•;;Itil . . :..:....,.... ..,:,..;.,,,,,:.: 10 20 25 30 40 50 .GO 70 75 80 90 95 99 - • : ':: !':04.--g . . • CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY .,. . • . . . . . . , . '. , - --•:;i1'. . . _ WOOD CENTER . ZINC, TOTAL RECOVERABLE (P01092) } . 10000 { . -w .,,, STANDARD = 5000 µg/L I 1I INdH .•. 111......... .......11111 111:........UUb N ENFORCEMENT ,,. ...i, _ y I t I , I , ' ,..,:.:1- r I 4 1 I . PREVENTIVE ACTION LIMIT = 2500 µg/L J j{ # I ji • o I # 0 II I i..,..\ cc 4 ,,,, z I I , U i z o • o 1 I S . • . j I f I 1 (/` 100 t_ 1 ! ` ... ACUTE TOXICITY CRITERIA - WARM WATER SPORT FISH = 64 µg/L « f _ 1.----, 4 . .. , .,). .e I s. I 4 10 1 5 10 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 75 80 90 95 99 CUMULATIVE PROBABILITY • •e • • • • CI ...... CT) • • • ors, 4 • • co • Nit) _j CC • CD U-I o CL".1 Z ‘111 0 1.• Lo 0 CD O.— I: II a a' L'3 •0 8 a F.: 0 0 RD , •ci" < • CO to 2 Cs1 cs, _J 0.) .• -J • U.! LL LL 1.1.1 • • 1/6I-1-1 .N01.011:11N33NOD • • /// //_/1 • . • • . . --e —... C) In--1--• ..........., .......... ... 0') • • '10 i..--e -e--e------ .., • •: • 1 a co •••••••• 1 • r•-• __1 .------4—------.... 2 a. c, ,...r .. , (r) ri a co cy) 0 ., co ......„ .... _..., 0 c„ z 1 e ilk 4. a CC . Own Famo : (./) I I i I ... > 0 < . E.---.. a 0 :11: ...I 1 I I 0 CO1 TIf i ..a..............-.............................-.•••• ...i.....•••••-...........I.T i 1 ....._ ...... ....... i r4 I I ... i I Cs.1 M 0 0 1 N —I ! I I E —_._-1 c) ...— ce) 1 11 I I I i I — 2 1 , .._i I- ............e.....•••••• Z . ............... .......... r- ..................-........... -___________......., •••• LLJ D . .._, LPL LLJ ; I ; I . 0 0 N r-• 0 e- • .r.' 1/6W 1N011V1:11.N33N00 • • ) • 11-11 - 9 3 ;. . , i . • . SOURCE IDENTIFICATION 400 pb y = 3.4907 + 1.1649e-2x RA2 = 0.972 • Zn y = 60.737 + 2.9498e-2x RA2 = 0.906 Cu y = 6.3499 + 4.1292e-3x RA2 = 0.999 300 - ' • o LEAD O • ZINC COPPER H 200 - T . z W _ U • Z Q U • Y ! 100 s o i i i ' i , i 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 TRAFFIC. VOLUME Y • L . • , f/ iL 9 t f fa: Tt� = µ' % Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • w October 13, 1993 Hs. Beverly J. Aho 12742 Gordon Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 . RE: Storm Water and Sediment Monitoring Concerns Dear Ms. Aho: This is in response to your call to Mr. Wayne Anderson of the Nonpoint Source • Section of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Your call was to follow up on discussion with Mr. Lou Flynn of my staff, which he documented in a letter dated June 16, 1993. As a result of your calls, Mr. Anderson and his staff have contacted a number of people and discussed this issue in depth to assure that our decisions are appropriate. With regard to the stormwater discharge to your yard., we had hoped that an agreeable solution could be reached between you, the city,, and the watershed district. - Although the MPCA would support any reasonable options, we do not have the authority or the funding to require or to construct trenches, pipes, or ponding areas for this project. With regard to your concerns about potential public health issues, the County Health Department through its agreements with the Minnesota Department of Health, is the primary agency responsible for public health issues. $e__ contacted Mr. Larry Myers of the Hennepin County Public jleal_rh Department, and lie indicated that there is no evidence of public health concern related to your property. He further indicated that he did not know of any monitoring or procedures that would verify whether there were or were not public health issues. In order to verify Mr. Myers' conclusions, we have talked to a toxicologist on our staff regarding the situation on your property. Our staff toxicoligist has worked extensively with environmentally contaminated sites and has addressed human health risks from contaminants in the environment. Her response was similar to that of Mr. Myers. She indicated that she was not aware of any public health concerns that would be associated with this type of runoff., In addition, it was her opinion that any study attempting to verify whether there were public health concerns from this runoff would require an extensive effort. Furthermore, there would be no guarantee of success in finding a relationship between the potential pollutants and public health concerns, even if an extensive study would be conducted. We have concluded that the Department of Health, through the Hennepin County Health Department, must take the lead regarding issues related to public health• and that no further studies are appropriate at this time. Telephone Device for Deaf (TDD): (612) 297-5353 Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10% paper recycled by consumers 520 Lafayette Rd.;St.Paul,MN 55155-4194;(612)296-6300; Regional Offices: Duluth•Brainerd•Detroit Lakes•Marshall•Rochester I 6 r 9 3 Equal Opportunity Employer•Printed on Recycled Paper I1G . - 7i October 13, 1993 • Ms. Beverly J•. Aho Page 2 If you have site specific information that would indicate that your property has a unique urban runoff situation, we feel it would be appropriate to bring it to the Hennepin County Health Department or the State Health Department for their consideration. If you wish to discuss our decision, please feel free to contact Mr. Wayne Anderson, of my staff, at (612) 296-7323. Sincerely, 'A<P,t11\ : 0JALGA.-- Su Kathy Svan , Manager Nonpoint Source Section Water Quality Division KS:ls - cc: Mr. Larry Myers, Hennepin County Health Department Mayor Douglas Tenpas, City of Eden Prairie 4111 it 2222: . 49 A) Gar 9 W r k • Iv / /