Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/07/1993• • • AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNcn. TUFSDAY, SEPfEMBER 7,1993 COUNCllMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNcn. CHAMBER 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City AUorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Council Recorder PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL UTERACY MONTH I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OrnER ITEMS OF BUSINFSS n. OPEN PODIUM m. MINUTES A. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUFSDAY, AUGUST 17,1993 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. B. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS FOR YEAR XIX CDBG PROGRAM Pg. 1924 Pg. 1925 Pg. 1931 Pg. 1932 C. VALLEY SPORTS & TRAVEL by J. Randall Iverson. 2nd Pg. 1934 Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 0.8145 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Valley Sports & Travel. Location: South of Valley View Road, east of Prairie Center Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service) City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 7, 1993 Page Two D. MINNESOTA PLASTICS by Ryan Construction. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers on 3.17 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Park Zoning District on 3.17 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Minnesota Plastics and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan for Minnesota Plastics. Location: Valley View Road and Equitable Drive. (Ordinance for PUn District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan) E. 7901 BUILDING RENOYATION AND PARKING EXPANSION by Smith Architects. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from I-General to 1-2 on 0.17 acres. Location: 7901 Fuller Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from l-General to 1-2) F. BLUFFS EAST 14TH ADDITION by Hustad Development. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUn District Review on 10.65 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 10.65 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Bluffs East 14th Addition. Location: Bluff Road and Wild Duck Pass. (Ordinance for PUn District Review and Zoning District Change) G. FINAL PLAT APPROYAL OF BLUFFS EAST 14th ADDITION, located south of Franlo Road and north of Bluff Road B. REQUEST FOR LAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR PRAIRIE LAKES BUSINESS CENTER, located" east"'CirPrairie Center Drive and west of Anderson Lakes I. AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, for Townline Road, Hennepin County Project No. 6312, City I.C. 52-173 (Resolution) J. CHANGE ORDER NO.6 FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION K. CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER PLAZA L. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS WITHOUT PRIOR COUNCIL APPROVAL M. RECEIPT OF 100% PETITION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE THE BEARPATH SUBDIVISION (Resolution) pg •• Pg. 1946 Pg. 1949 Pg. 1957 Pg. 1958 Pg. 1962 Pg. 1964 Pg. 1965 Pg. 1966 • • • • City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 7, 1993 Page Three VI. v. PUBLIC HEARlNGSlMEETINGS A. B. C. D. E. SHADY OAK RIDGE 4TH ADDITION by Joe Ruzic. Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 2.28 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.28 acres into 4 lots. Location: Northwest corner of Rowland Road and Old Shady Oak Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Rl-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) BACHMAN'S by Bachman's Inc. Request for PUD Concept Review on 23 acres, PUD District Review with waivers on 5.8 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 5.8 acres and Preliminary Plat of 12.57 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot. Location: Northwest corner of Prairie Center Drive and Singletree Lane. (Resolution for PUD Concept; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to Commercial Regional Service; and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) BOULDER POINTE 5TH ADDITION by Robert H. Mason, Inc. Request for PUD Concept Review on 150 acres, PUD District Review on 31.21 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5 on 31.21 acres, Preliminary Plat of 31.21 acres into 30 lots and one outlot. Location: Boulder Pointe Road and Mitchell Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RI-13.5; and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VIROMED LABORA TORIFS by Opus Corporation. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 5.22 acres, PUD Concept Amendment on 5.22 acres, Rezoning from Office to Industrial on 5.22 acres, and Site Plan Review on 5.22 acres for construction of a 50,550 square foot building. Location: Opus Circle Blue east of American Family Insurance. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment; Resolution for PUD Concept; and Ordinance for Rezoning from Omce to Industrial) MODIFICATION OF DEVEWPMENT DISTRICT NO.1 (Resolution) PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution adopting proposed 1994 property tax levy, setting Truth- in-Taxation hearing date(s), and accepting a proposed 1994 budget for the General Fund and tax-supported debt obligations. Pg. 1967 Pg. 1973 Pg. 1990 ,Pg. 2007 Pg.2049 ,Pg. 2060 Pg. 2061 City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 7, 1993 Page Four vm. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Satterstrom Variance Appeal IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS" COMMITI'EES x. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OFCOUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION" NATURAL RESOURCES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY G. REPORT OF FINANCE DIRECTOR XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT • Pg. 2062 • • • • PROCLAMATION City of Eden Prairie Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, One in five Minnesotans cannot read this proclamation; and WHEREAS, 700,000 Minnesotans have not earned a high school diploma; and WHEREAS, the social and economic consequences of illiteracy are far-reaching and affect the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie School Board and South Hennepin Adult Programs in Education acknowledges the importance of adult basic education, literacy and English As A Second Language instruction; and WHEREAS, it is important to recognize participants in adult basic education programs, both students and volunteers; and WHEREAS, Eden Prairie citizens wish to join other national groups in the celebration of Literacy Month; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor of Eden Prairie, on behalf of the Eden Prairie City Council, do hereby proclaim Attest: September 1993 as LITERACY AWARENESS MONTH in the City of Eden Prairie Proclaimed this 7th day of September, 1993 • John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor .TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1993 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Harris was absent. • • I. APPROV AL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added items VII.A.,Fertilizer Ordinance; XI.A.!., Requirement for Sanitation Facilities at Construction Sites; XI.A.2., Arbitrage Refunds from IRS for Bond Sales; and XI.A.3., Request for Preservation of Prairie Grass Site. Jullie added item VI. Payment of Claims, Check #14194, Stahl Construction for $1,237,485.00; item Vm.A., Set Date for Hearing for Appeal from Decision of the Board of Appeals for Satherstrom, and XI.B.3., Agenda Packet Process and Content. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda as submitted and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. OPEN PODIUM There were no items presented during Open Podium. m. MINUTES A. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING HELD TUESDAY. AUGUST 3.1993 B . MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the joint City Council/Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission meeting of August 3, 1993, as submitted. Motion carried on a 3-0-1 vote with Jessen abstaining. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. AUGUST 3. 1993 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of August 3, 1993, with an amendment to page 3, paragraph 2, of item V.A., changing "negations" to "negotiations." Motion carried on a 3-0-1 vote with Jessen abstaining. City Council Minutes 2 August 17, 1993 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR • A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST (INCLUDES RESOLUTION #93-168. APPROVING CLASS A GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE HARTINGER FOUNDATION) B. RESOLUTION #93-169. APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CITY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CSAH 18 PROJECT (AGREEMENT PW 38-49-93) C. WEBBER ADVERTISING by Eden Trace Corporation. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Park Zoning District on 4.8 acres; Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Webber Advertising; and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan for Webber Advertising. Location: Martin Drive. (Ordinance #32-93, Zoning District Amendment and Resolution #93-170 Site Plan) D. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH T. MICHAEL CLARKE E. RESOLUTION #93-171. APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF WEST FIVE BUSINESS CENTER (located alon&: Fuller Road. South of TH 5) F. RESOLUTION #93-172. APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENV ALE INDUSTRIAL 10TH ADDITION (located north of Martin Drive and east of Mitchell Road) G. RESOLUTION #93-173. APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FAIRFIELD SOUTH 2ND (locate. at the NW Ouadrant of Pioneer Trail and Braxton Drive) H. RESOLUTION #93-174. APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FAIRFIELD WEST 2ND ADDITION (located south of proposed Scenic Hei&:hts Road and north of New Market Drivel I. RESOLUTION #93-175. AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION AMENDING THE PLAT OF FAIRFIELD SOUTH J. CHANGE ORDER NO.2. ROWLAND ROAD/OLD SHADY OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. I.C.52-067 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve items A. -J. of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. BLUFFS EAST 14TH ADDITION by Hustad Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 186 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 10.65 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 10.65 acres and Preliminary Plat of 10.65 acres into 24 lots. Location: Bluff Road and Wild Duck Pass. (Resolution for PUD Concept; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to Rl-13.5; a. Resolution for Preliminary Plat) City Council Minutes 3 August 17, 1993 • • • Beth Hustad, developer, presented the development plans. Enger reported that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the development. Council members discussed concerns related to the stormwater drainage for the area, including capacity and timing of improvements. Dietz said current capacity of the pond had been sufficient to handle recent large rain events. He added that the plan for stormwater management in this area had always included a pumping station for storm water on the final site, which was owned by the same developer, Hustad Development. Timing of the construction of the pumping station and development of the final parcel were dependent upon the timing of Hennepin County Department of Transportation with respect to improvements on County Road #18. Hustad concurred about the timing, adding that her company had every intention of putting in the storm water facility as part of the final development. Arnold Stevens, 10424 Fawns Way, expressed concern about drainage in this area with respect to the adjacent townhome structures. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to: 1) Adopt Resolution #93-176, approving the PUD Concept; 2) Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning; 3) Adopt Resolution #93-177, approving the Preliminary Plat, and 4) Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission, Staff, and Council concerns. Further, Council directed Staff to review the storm water drainage plans for the overall area prior to second reading to assure the adequacy of the system with respect to Fawns Way residents and overall system capacity for future needs and to report findings to the Council prior to second reading of the ordinance for this development. Motion carried unanimously. B. 7901 BUILDING RENOVATION AND PARKING EXPANSION by Smith Architects. Request for Zoning District Change from I-General to 1-2 on 0.17 acres and the Preliminary Plat of 9.05 acres into 2 lots. Location: 7901 Fuller Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from 1- General to 1-2 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) John Smith, architect for the developer, explained the request and presented the plans for the proposed development. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the development. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to: 1) Close the Public Hearing; City Council Minutes 4 August 17, 1993 2) Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Rezoning; • 3) Adopt Resolution #93-178, approving the Preliminary Plat; and 4) Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. C. VACATION 93-02. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PART OF LOTS 5 AND 6. BLOCK 8. WINDFIELD 3RD ADDITION There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to: 1) Close the Public Hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution #93-179 vacating the drainage and utility easements. Motion carried unanimously. D. VACATION 93-03. SNOW FENCE EASEMENTS AWNG BRYANT LAKE ROAD • There were no comments from members of the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to: 1) Close the Public Hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution #93-180, vacating the drainage and utility easements. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAWS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims with the addition of Check #14194, Stahl Construction for $1,237,485.00. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. Fertilizer Reeulations Pidcock had examples of ordinances relating to use of lawn chemicals and potential environmen~ damages from their use. She suggested that the City consider adoption of such an ordinanc~ Dawson explained that he and Council member Anderson served on an environmental cities organization which was addressing this issue as a group. City Council Minutes 5 August 17, 1993 • Council directed Staff to begin work on a draft ordinance and to work through the Waste Management and the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commissions on the matter. vm.PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS • • A. Set Date for Hearine for Anneal from Decision of the Board of Anneals for Satherstrom MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to set it for September 7th for review of the Satherstrom appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals regarding a requested variance. Motion carried unanimously. IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. 1. 1. 2. Portable Sanitation Facilities at Construction Sites Pidcock reported that she had received complaints about the sanitary conditions at construction sites. Council members concurred that the problem was not only unsanitary, but also unsightly . Staff was directed to include requirements for sanitary facilities in all developer's agreements for all non-residential developments, and for any residential development consisting of five (5), or more building sites. Arbitraee Refunds from IRS for Bond Sales Pidcock referenced Federal legislation regarding refunds potentially available to the City from arbitrage for bond sales. Staff reported that legislation had been evaluated as it might impact the City; however, it was found the City would not receive any refunds. 3. Request for Preservation of Prairie Grass Site Pidcock recommended that the City respond to the letter from Mr. Paul Moss regarding his observations and concerns about the prairie grasses on the parcel near Flying Cloud Airport. Staff said a follow up letter would be sent to Mr. Moss. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER A ward Contract for Telephone System for City Center Council members raised concerns that, with a new telephone system in place, Staff must develop and implement a procedure for employee accountability with respect to clearing their voice mail and doing so promptly to avoid the frustrations experienced in other organizations. City Council Minutes 6 August 17, 1993 MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize execution of the contract Wi. Tie Systems, Inc. per its proposal and subsequent modifications. Motion carried unanimousl 2. Set Date for Bud2et Session Workshop Council directed Staff to set August 31st at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the Budget Session Workshop. If possible, the meeting would be held at the new City Center facility. 3. Aeenda Packet Process and Content Jullie introduced Dean Barry, a communications consultant recently hired by the City. It was explained that, due to changes involved with cablecasting of the meetings, the agenda process and content would require some change. Barry would be contacting Council members directly regarding their opinions and concerns. xu. OTHER BUSINESS Xill. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson. Mayor Tenpas adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST September 7, 1993 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Arkay Construction Company Bor Son Building Corporation CBI Na..:Con, Inc.. Tony Crawford Construction John A. Da1sin and Son, Inc. G & B Constructton Gorski & Olson Construction, Inc. ~~et-Con Metro, Inc. Timberlake Construction Co., Inc . PLUMBING Lake Harriet Plumbing & ~eating Nybo-Peterson Plumbing Co., Inc. Robi 11 ard Pl umbing & :1a intenance PRIVATE KENNEL Marian L. Smetana (7722 Smetana Lane) TEMPORARY LIQUOR Association of Naval Aviation- Planes of Fame Squadron (9-25-93) These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for e licensed ctivity . • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Planning David Lindahl, Planner THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager SUBJECT: EXECUTION SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS FOR YEAR XIX CDBG PROGRAM. DATE: August 16, 1993 Recommended Action: Approve the Resolution which authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute Year XIX CDBG Sub recipient Agreements between the City and Hennepin County for the 1993/94 Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) . • Background: • Hennepin County is the entitlement agency receiving CDBG funds directly from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and is called a Grant Recipient. The County distributes these funds to the City of Eden Prairie and 42 other cities throughout the County who participate in the CDBG program. These cities are called Grant Subrecipients. Each year the City (Subrecipient) is required by HUD to execute subrecipient agreements with Hennepin County (Recipient) for each CDBG activity approved for funding by the City. The Subrecipient Agreements specify the requirements for implementing each CDBG activity. Each year these agreements must be executed for each activity approved by the City. The City Council approved the following activities for the Year XIX CDBG Program, which runs from July 1, 1993 through December 31, 1994, 1. Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program 2. Removal of Architectural Barriers 3. Child Care Subsidy (GMDCA) 4. Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) 5. Sign Language Interpreters (Adaptive Rec.) 6. CASH Homline TOTAL $80,000 $54,883 $20,559 $ 9,000 $ 2,500 $ 1,661 $168,603 • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, l\1INNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR & CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS FOR THE COMl\flJNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has executed a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County for the purpose of participating in the 1993 (Year XIX) Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is the recipient of an annual grant from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for purposes of the program and the City is a subrecipient under the program and receives a share of the grant; WHEREAS, program regulations require that the City and County execute a Subrecipient Agreement, which sets forth the specific implementation processes for activities to be undertaken with program funds. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute Subrecipient Agreements between the City and Hennepin County on behalf of the City. ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT VALLEY SPORT AND TRAVEL THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of September 7, 1993, by J. Randall Iverson, an individual, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to C-Regional Service on .82 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.93 acres into 2 lots for construction of a 5,980 square foot building, all on 2.93 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. 34-93 , Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: • • 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 6, 1993, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHffiIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 4. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property. Developer further agrees that all grading shall proceed in accordance with the City's Erosion Control Policy. 5. 6. V ALLEY VIEW ROAD ACCESS: Developer agrees to close the current access onto Valley View Road when the access to the property over the adjacent property to the west is comPleted. Developer further agrees to obtain a cross-access agreement over the adjacent property to the west which provides for access to Valley View Road, and which is in a form acceptable to the City Engineer. STORMW ATER TREATMENT: In lieu of constructing on-site stormwater treatment facilities, Developer agrees to compensate City $8,000 to pay for costs to provide treatment of stormwater at an off-site location. Prior to issuance of any building permit or release of any final plat for the property, developer shall execute an assessment agreement in the amount of $8,000 for stormwater treatment facilities to be assessed for a period of five years at an annual interest rate of7.5%. • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 34-93 VALLEY SPORTS & TRAVEL AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Commercial Regional Service District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Commercial Regional Service District, and the legal .deSCriPtions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 7, 1993, entered into between J. Randall Iverson, and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 6th day of July, 1993, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor • PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ____________ _ Exhibit "A" That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, PRAIRIE WASH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, said Hennepin County; thence on an assumed bearing of North 21 degrees 24 minutes 22 seconds West along the easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 347.80 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 68 degrees 35 minutes 38 seconds East a distance of 367.81 feet; thence northeasterly a distance of 30.93 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the .northwest, having a radius of 1205.92 feet and a central angle of 1 degree 28 minutes 10 seconds to the easterly line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 0 degrees 30 minutes 52 seconds East along the last described easterly line a distance of 469.38 feet to the southeasterly corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 16 seconds West along the southerly line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 248.36 feet to the point of beginning. • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 34-93 V ALLEY SPORTS & TRAVEL AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at South of Valley View Road, east of Prairie Center Drive, from Rural to Commercial Regional Service, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. • Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. • ATTEST: lsI John D. Frane City Clerk IslDouglas B. Tenpas Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ________ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT MINNESOTA PLASTICS THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of September 7, 1993, by Ryan Construction Company, a Minnesota Corporation, and Minnesota Plastics, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, both hereinafter jointly referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept ~ment on 15.67 acres, to the Edenvale Industrial Park 9th Addition, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers, Zoning District Amendment within the 1-2 Zoning District and Site Plan Review on 3.17 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No.35-93-PUD-1O-93, and • ResOlution ~o. 93-165, PUD Concept, Res~lution No. _-_'. Site Plan Review, Developer covenants and agrees to constructIon upon, development, and mamtenance of saId Property as follows: -. • 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 3, 1993, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHmIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto . I~\ :n \, ' 4. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Developer agrees to submit to the Senior Planner and receive the Senior Planner's approval of samples of exterio. materials to be implemented on the building on the property. Upon approval by the Senior Planner, Developer agrees to implement or cause to be implemented said exterior materials as depicted on Exhibit B, in accordance with the terms and provisions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to occupancy permit. 5. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENlNG: Developer has submitted to the City, and obtained City's approval of a plan and materials to be implemented for screening of mechanical equipment on the property. Security to guarantee said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the property, per City code requirements. 6. PUD DISTRICT WAIVERS: City hereby grants the following waivers to City code requirements within the 1-2 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the property and incorporate said waivers as part of PUD- 7. A. Allowance for base area ratio in the 1-2 District of .34, instead of .30. SIDEWALK ON ANAGRAM DRIVE: Developer is responsible for the construction of a five- foot wide concrete sidewalk along Anagram Drive as depicted on Exhibit B, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, concurrent with building construction on the site. • • • MINNESOTA PLASTICS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 35-93-PUD-I0-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND IN ONE ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the 1-2 Park District, 35-93-PUD-1O-93 (hereinafter "PUD-1O-93-1-2 Park"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 7, 1993, entered into between Minnesota Plastics, and the City of Eden .prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-1O-93-1-2 Park and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-I0-93-1-2 Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-1O-93-1-2 Park is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-1O-93-I-2 Park are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-1O-93-1-2 Park is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the 1-2 Park District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 10-93-1-2 Park District, and • the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are herebe adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 3rd day of August, 1993, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _______________ _ • • Exhibit "A" • Lot 3, Block 1, Anagram Addition • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 35-93-PUD-IO-93 MINNESOTA PLASTIC. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND IN ONE ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amending ofland located at Valley View Road and Equitable Drive in the 1-2 Park Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. I s/Douglas B. Tenpas Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ________ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 1 , .... ·"1 ~ -'I "1 , i • • • MINNESOTA PLASTICS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR MINNESOTA PLASTICS FOR RYAN CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, Ryan Construction has applied for Site Plan approval of the Minnesota Plastics on 3.17 acres for construction of a 45,600 sq. ft. building on property located at Valley View Road & Equitable Drive, to be amended within the I-2 Park Zoning District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on August 3, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 12, 1993, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its August 3, 1993, meeting; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Minnesota Plastics for construction of a 45,600 sq. ft. building, based on plans dated July 29, 1993, between Minnesota Plastics, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • 7901 Building Renovation and Parking Expansion CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 33-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the I-General District and be placed in the 1-2 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from • the I-General District and shall be included hereafter in the 1-2 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. • SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of August, 1993, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto, at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on --------------------------- <\:~ Exhibit. A LEGAL DESCRIPTION; LOT 2, BLOCK 1, WEST 5 BUSINESS CENTER, AND LOT 3, EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTH 390.98 FEET OF SAID LOT 3, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THAT PART OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3, HAVING A RECORD DIMENSION OF 398.11 FEET WHICH LIES WESTERLY OF A LINE 60.00 FEET NORTHWESTERLYOF MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2, HAVING A RECORD DIMENSION OF 426.00 FEET, BLOCK 1, EDEN PRAIRIE INDUSTRIAL PARK, PER TORRENS CASE 18820. • • • • • • 7901 Building Renovation and Parking Expansion CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 33-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 7901 Fuller Road, from 1- General to 1-2). Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. IslDouglas B. Tenpas Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ________ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Council THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Alan D. Gray, P.E., City Engineer DATE: September 3, 1993 SUBJECT: Bluffs East 14th Addition Supplemental Storm Water Pumping Plan Storm water from the proposed Bluffs East 14th Addition will drain easterly through existing storm sewers to the existing pond located between the Bluffs East 6th Addition and CSAH 18. Approximately 80 acres of the Bluffs East area drain to this kettle hole pond. Storm water entering this pond either evaporates or percolates through the sandy soils in the pond bottom. Percolation has been effective at maintaining this pond at or below its normal hign water level. A storm water pumping station is planned to supplement natural percolation through the pond bottom. The outlet for the pumping station will be storm sewer constructed by Hennepin County in the frontage road to CSAH 18. This construction is planned for 1994. It is feasible to defer construction of the pumping station until 1994 or 1995. No structures are at elevations near the normal high water elevation of the pond and flooding is not a threat. An assessment agreement is recommended between the City and Hustad Development Company, Inc. to "cement" the financial responsibility for the construction of the pumping station. ADG:ssa • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BLUFFS EAST 14TH ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of September 7, 1993, by Creek Knolls Partnership, a Minnesota Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 186 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 10.65 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RI- 13.5 on 10.65 acres and Preliminary Plat of 10.65 acres into 24 single family lots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" • NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. 36-93-PUD-1l-93, and Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 93-177, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: • 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 17, 1993, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHmIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto . 4. 5. TREE REPLACEMENT: Tree loss is calculated at 21 % or 144 inches. Tree replacement is 40 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan depicts 121 caliper inches. Since only 40 Cali~ inches are required to satisfy the tree replacement requirement for the Bluffs East 14th Addition, the remaining 81 caliper inches shall be credited towards the overall tree replacement requirement for the Bluff Country Planned Unit Development Concept. Developer is required to implement the proposed tree replacement plan concurrent with the development of individual homes within the property as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto. REAR YARD DRAINAGE PROBLEMS: Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and receive his approval thereof, of a revised grading and drainage plan to correct drainage problems along the common lot line between Bluffs East 7th Addition, and Lots 1 -12, Bluffs East 14th Addition. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, said grading and drainage improvements concurrent with site grading and street and utility construction. 6. STORM DRAINAGE -PUMPING OF WATER FROM POND TO COUNTY ROAD 18: Prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall enter into an assessment agreement for the future construction of a storm water pumping station on Outlot E, Bluffs East Sixth Addition. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to construct or cause to be construct~~ said improvements as associated with the pumping of storm water in accordance with the ter~ of Exhibit C, attached hereto, and concurrent with street and utility construction for Bluffs East 14th addition. 7 . SIDEWALKS: Prior to the issuance by the City of a grading permit for construction on the property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, and obtain the Director's approval of detailed plan for a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk to be located on Wild Duck Pass between Franlo Road and Bluff Road, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented said sidewalk, concurrent with street construction on the property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto . • • BLUFFS EAST 14TH ADDmON CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-93-PUD-11-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING TIlE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development R1-13.5 District 36-93-PUD-11-93 (hereinafter "PUD-11-93- RI-13.5"). • Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's. Agreement dated as of September 7, 1993, entered into between Bluffs East 14th Addition, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-II-93-R 1-13.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. • Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-1l-93-R1-13.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-1l-93-RI-13.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-11-93-Rl-13.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-1l-93-Rl-13.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 11-93-RI-13.5 District, and th. legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of August, 1993, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of September, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _______________ _ • • Exhibit A • Outlot B, Bluffs East 8th Addition, City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • BLUFFS EAST 14TH ADDITI0lt CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-93-PUD-11-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Bluff Road and Wild Duck Pass, from Rural to Rl-13.5, subject to the terms and conditions of a Developer's Agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. I s/Douglas B. Tenpas Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ________ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) C/ ""<'1 \ '-! ''J ' • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BLUFFS EAST 14TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Bluffs East 14th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Bluffs East 14th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated September 2, 1993. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 7, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering TechniCian~ September 2, 1993 Final Plat Report for Bluffs East 14th Addition PROPOSAL: Creek Knolls Limited Partnership and Woodale Builders are requesting City Council approval of the final plat of Bluffs East 14th Addition. Located between Franlo Road and Bluff Road, the plat contains 10.65 acres to be divided into 24 single family lots, and road right-of-way for street purposes. This proposal is a further subdivision of Outlot B, Bluffs East 8th Addition. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council August 17, 1993. Second reading of the ordinance approving rezoning of the property, and execution of the Developer's Agreement are scheduled for Council action September 7, 1993 . V ARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: Municipal sanitary sewer and municipal watermain are currently available for extension into the project. Installation of all public utilities and roadways will be done in conformance with the Developer's Agreement and the requirements of City Code. BONDING: Bonding to cover the installation of all public utilities and streets must be provided prior to release of the final plat. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Bluffs East 14th Addition subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: JJ:ssa 1. 2. 3. 4. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $478. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $4,763. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $960. Satisfaction of bonding requirements. cc: Beth Simonsted, Creek Knolls Limited Partnership Hedlund Engineering • • • • • • -MEMORANDUM- TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Eugene A. Dietz, P .E., Director of Public Works FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician & September 2, 1993 Grading Permit for Prairie Lakes Business Center Hartford Insurance Companies are requesting City Council approval of a grading permit within the Prairie Lakes Business Center, located east of Prairie Center Drive and west of Anderson Lakes. This property was developed in 1981 with the construction of municipal utilities, streets and later two large office buildings. The remainder of the property is vacant. The owners desire a land alteration permit to allow the completion of the site grading in conformance with the original development plan, and also to allow the modification and replacement of existing wetlands within the site in conformance with the current 1991 Wetland Conservation Act. Please review the attached materials for additional information. Recommend approval of the request for grading permit within the Prairie Lakes Business Center subject to issuance of a permit by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. JJ:ssa / • • • SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, SECTION SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 10 CONTRACT NO. 6312 COUNTY PROJECT NO. 6312 COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 62 LOCATION: CSAH 62 from East of Boulder Creek Drive to West of CSAH No. 60. CLASS OF WORK: Grading, drainage, bituminous surfacing, traffic signals and bridges. CONTRACTOR: Edward Kraemer and Sons, Inc. 1020 West Cliff Road Burnsville, MN 55337 Thi~ contract is amended as follows: WHEREAS: This contract provides for, among other things, the construction of bituminous bike paths along CSAH 62 within the Cities of Minnetonka and Eden Prairie, and WHEREAS: The Cities have mutually requested that an additional bike path be constructed that connects Town line Court to CSAH 4 and then proceeds northerly acros~ Bridge No. 27AOI to the Glen Lake B1vd./Wi11iams Lane intersection, and WHEREAS: The Engineer has reviewed this request, and has prepared plans and a cost estimate which are acceptable to both Cities for the accomplishment of this work, and WHEREAS: It is necessary to enter into a supplemental agreement with the contractor because of the addltional labor and equipment costs that are associated with the revised work. NOW THEREFORE IT IS MUTUALLY ~GREED AS FOLLOWS: I. The contractor shall perform the revised bike path construction as described below: a. Place suitable common borrow material for the revised Town Line Court cul-de-sac and connecting blke path grades. b. Remove the inplace topsoil backfill north of Bridge No. 27AOI and replace with suitable embankment material. c. Grade the berm section along CSAH 4 south of Town Line Court to a ten foot width rather than the six feet specified in the plans for future bike path construction. d. Construct an eight foot wide bituminous bike path from CSAH 4 to Town 1 line Court and from To~ line Court to the bike path that parallels CSAH 62. e. Construct a six foot wide bituminous bike path (measured from face of curb) along CSAH 4 from Town line Court northerly to Williams lane. 2., The above mentioned work shall be performed in accordance with current Mn/DOT Stan1ard'Specifications, the existing plans and special p~ovisions and as directed by the Engineer. 3.' The Engineer will have the locations of the work to be performed staked as necessary and shall inspect the progress of the work thereafter. 4. The work will be measured in accordance with the units of measurement as shown below in the Estimate of Cost. 5. Payment for the performance of the work shall be made at existing contract unit prices as shown in the Estimate of Cost except for the following: a. Compensation for the additional work of removing and disposing of the inplace topsoil along CSAH 4 and replacing with suitable compacted borrow material, to include all associated labor and equipment costs ~hall be paid for under ne~ Item, "Bike Path Grading, S~A. I 10", at the negotiated lump sum unit price as shown in the Estimate of Cost. b. Compensation for the additional equipment and labor necessary for the paving of the newly proposed bike path (width and alignment variation) shall be paid for under new Item, "Bike Path Paving, S.A. 110 M , at the negotiated lump sum unit price as shown in the Estimate of Cost. ~ 6. Payment for the revised work under the existing and newly negotiated unit ~ prices shall be consider~d compensation in full for all costs incidental to completing the work as specified. 7.-Contract time will not be revised except as otherwise may be provided under the contract provisions of Mn/DOT Specification 1806. 8. The contractor shall not make claim of any kind or character whatsoever for any other costs or expenses which he may have incurred or which he may hereafter incur in performing the work and furnishing the materials required by this agreement. 2 ~ ;' / • • • ESTIMATE OF COST Items Added to the Contract: Item No. 2105.523 2340.514 2340.508 Item Common Borrow (LV) Type 31 Base Course Mixture Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture Bike Path Grading SA #10 Bike Path Paving SA #10 Prime Contractor Allowance at 10% Bike Path Grading and Paving SA #10 Total Additional Cost Amount Requested Original Contract Previous Additions Total To Date Percentage Increase Cost Participation: City of Eden Prairie -25% City of Minnetonka -25% Hennepin County -50% Unit Unit Price C.Y. 2.68 TON 16.80 TON 19.85 loS. 2,000.00 loS. 1,500.00 loS. 350.00 $10,266.00 $6,461,782.82 302,958.34 6,775,007.16 4.85% 3 . Quan Amount 1,300 $3,484.00- 80 1,344.00 80 1,588.00 1 2,000.00 1 1,500.00 1 350.00 $10,266.00 , The Contractor, having signed this contract, and the County having duly approved this contract on , 1~93, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County officials having signed this contract, the parties hereto agree to be boune by the provisions herein set forth. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA UPON PROPER EXECUTION, THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE LEGALLY VALID AND ~INDING. By: ______________________ __ Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION By:~~-------------------Assistant County Attorney Date : ___________________ _ By: ~--~~~----~~~------Associate County Administrator and County Engineer RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: ~~--~--------~~~~~ Director, Department of Public Works By: ~~~~~---------------Project Engineer By: ~~~~----~---------City of Minnetonka By: ~Ci~t~y--of~E~d-en~P~r-a~ir~i~e------- EDWARD KRAEMER l SONS, INC. STATE OF MINNESOTA) } SSe COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) By ______________________ ___ ITS, _______________ _ AND, ________________ _ ITS, _______________ _ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ------------ day of __________ , 1993, by ______________________ and _______________ of __________________ on bena~f of the corporation. Notary Publ i c, _________ _ My commission expires: -------- • • • • • TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ~ August 30, 1993 Change Order No. 6 for the Community Center Addition & Change Order No. 1 for the Community Center Plaza Attached are the request sheets for Change Order No.6 for the Community Center Addition and Change Order No. 1 for the Community Center Plaza. The Community Center addition Change Order totals $15,474.50 worth of credit. The Change Order for the Community Center Plaza totals $7,469 for soil correction that was necessary to the new parking lot and road system in front of the Community Center. Both projects have been substantially complete for sometime and only have a few items left on the punch list for completion. City staff request authorization to approve both Change Orders. RAL:mdd CHANGE ORDER AlA DOCUMENT G701 Distribution to: OWNER ~ ARCHITECT cr CONTRACTOR 0 FIELD 0 OTHER 0 --------------------~. 'PROJECT: Eden Prairie C. C. Plaza/ Park CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: One (1) (name, address) 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 INITIATION DATE: August 6, 1993 TO (Contractor): r Shingobee Builders 279 Medina: St. N. ~Loretto, MN 55357 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9117.4 CONTRACT FOR: Plaza/Parking Construction CONTRACT DATE: Sept. 9, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Soil correction work per time and material as quoted in Shingobee letter dated November 27, 1992, $7,469.00 Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, induding any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract TIme. The original (Contract Sum) ~~XJm) was ., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• $ Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ The (Contract Sum) rior to this Change Order was .•.••..... $ The (Contract Sum) (~DK will be (increased)~~) by this Change Order ................••..•....•..•...•....••..•..........•.•.• $ The new (Contract Sum) (~~~~t) including this Change Order will be .. , $ The Contract TIme will be 1MXOO~t<I~ (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is 235,244.00 0.00 235,244.00 7,469.00 242,713.00 ( Authorized: Delano Erickson Arch Shingobee Builders City of E.P. CQNTRACTOR 279 Medina St. N. 9WNER 600 Executive Address Address Address Mpls, MN 55426 Loretto, MN 55357 E.P., MN 55344 • ) Days. • BY ____________________ ___ DATE AlA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRil 1978 EDITION • AlA-• ® 1978 THE AMERIC,\N INSTITUTe OF ARCHITeCTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W .• WASHINCTON, D.C. 20006 DATE G701-1978 • Distribution to: OWNER 0 ARCHITECT 0 CONTRACTOR 0 ORDER AlA DOCUMENT G707 FIELD 0 OTHER 0 PROJECT: Eden Prairie C.C. Addition (name. address) 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 TO (Contractor): ~hingObee Builders I 279 Medina St. N. CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: Six (6) INITIATION DATE: August 6, 1993 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9117 CONTRACT FOR: Construction Loretto, MN 55357 L -.J CONTRACT DATE: May 21, 1992 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: 1. Pilaster reinforcing and grout 2. Omit correction of beam forming 3. Omit correction of stained tile, 660.00 (330.00) hardware and twisted seat planks 4. ~dit for OWner supplied gas for temporary heating ( 195.00) (12,500.00) (500.00) (1,974.50) 5. Credit for routing dasher cap rail 6. Credit for retesting costs by Owner 7. Credit for dasher gate (3 acrylic panels) & tool rental for installation by Owner TOTAL Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. (635.00) ( 15 , 4 74 • 5 0 ) Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith. including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) ~~~ was ........•...•..••.....•••.. $1, 898 , 200.00 Net change by previol.:'~jy authorized Change Orders ................................... $ 162 , .16 8 • 51 The (Contract Sum) (~~~ prior to this Change Order was .....••... $2',06'0,368'.53 The (Contract Sum) (~~~ will be ~~ (decreased) (~ ( 15,474. SO ) by this Change Order ......................................................... $ The new (Contract Sum) KjOXiX~~) including this Change Order will be ... $2,044,894.03 The Contract Time will be (~~~~ (unchanged) by ( ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is Authorized: Delano Erickson Shingobee Builders City of EP ~CHITECT 7415 Wayzata Blvd f~RExecutive Dr. Address Address Loretto, MN 55357 ~ddres5 . . MN t;C1en Pra~~re, Mpls, MN 55426 • ~BY1~- DATE S -z.o-'1.3 By ______________________ __ BV ____________________ __ DATE DATE AlA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANCE ORDER • ""!ut 1'17B EDITION • AIA@t • @ 1978 THE """IERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,17J!i NEW YORK "VE., N.W .• WMHINC.TON. D.C. 2000li G701-1978 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIM:S BY FINANCE DEPARTMENT WITHOUT PRIOR COUNCIL APPROV AL BE IT RESOLVED, that the following types of claims may be paid by the City Manager, Treasurer, or Deputy Treasurer, without prior approval by the City Council: Contracted items (utilities, rents, land, easements, construction, etc.) Payroll Liabilities Postage Petty Cash Licenses and Fees Schools and conferences and related travel expenses Refunds Programmed Professional Performances Invoices which offer discounts or have interest added Payments to vendors not allowing charge accounts Tickets paid by registration fees • Employee expenses Motor vehicle registration Insurance • Amounts due to other government agencies Police "buy" money Liquor store inventory items Payments to comply with agreements which provide for a fixed time for payment ADOPTED by the City Council on September 7, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR I.C. 93-5335 EXTENSION OF SANITARY SEWER FROM THE RED ROCK INTERCEPTOR TO THE BEARPATH SUBDIVISION BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100 % of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of Hanson, Thorp, Pellinen, and Olson, Inc. 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City'S official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on September 7, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL • John D. Frane, Clerk i. • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Uram, Planner DATE: September 3, 1993 SUBJECT: Shady Oak Ridge 4th Addition The proponent, Joe Ruzic, requests a continuance of the Shady Oak Ridge 4th Addition to the September 21, 1993 City Council meeting in order to resolve the issues regarding the water line/fire hydrant location and accessory building removal timing . • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. BACHMAN'S A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVEWPMENT CONCEPT OF BACHMAN'S FOR BACHMAN'S INC. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Bachman's PUD Concept by Bachman's Inc. and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1993; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1993. 1. Bachman's Inc., being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 3, 1993. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 23, 1993. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September, Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Legal Description Bachman's Lot 1, Block 1, Eden Prairie MarketCenter 2nd Addition • • • • • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BACHMAN'S FOR BACHMAN'S, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: BACHMAN'S That the preliminary plat of Bachman's for Bachman's, Inc. dated September 3, 1993, consisting of 12.57 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of September, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk c STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Donald R. Uram, Planner Chris Enger, Director of Community Development August 20, 1993 Bachman's Floral and Garden Center Bachman's City of Eden Prairie North of Singletree Lane, East of Prairie Center Drive 1. PUD Concept Review on 23 acres. 2. PUD District Review with waivers on 5.867 acres. 3. 4. ~.~.:':" .. ...... ,:.~C;7iC:'i Preliminary plat of 12.57 acres into 2 lots and 1 outlot. Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 5.867 acres. 'N. 7'3 TH S:: • • • • • • ( starr Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 EDEN PRAIRIE MARKETCENTER c The primary goal for development of the Eden Prairie Marketcenter is to "Develop a combination of land uses which serve as a commercial service and recreational focal center for the community of Eden Prairie." A secondary goal of the Marketcenter is to establish a clear, identifiable architectural "theme" that is expressed in site work, exterior materials and building architecture. The purpose of these goals are to help the City achieve a distinctively designed, cohesively coordinated downtown. The Bachman' s Floral and Garden Center helps to achieve these goals in the following ways: 1. It begins to establish the specialty retail aspect of the Marketcenter. With this development and the Brunswick Family World facility, Staff anticipates that additional specialty retail and recreation/entertainment uses will be attracted to the area. Both projects also help to add value to the remaining property. 2. The site plan and building architecture is consistent with what is developed in the area furthering the cohesiveness of the development. The City Staff will continue to recommend that all projects developed in the area be consistent with the types of design details established by the existing buildings and the Marketcenter Design Framework Manual. GUIDE PLAN The property is guided for Regional Commercial land uses and currently zoned Rural. Adjacent parcels to the east, west and south are also guided Regional Commercial and developed with Regional Commercial land uses. The Guide Plan indicates industrial to the north which is the location of Rosemount Engineering. Bachman • s is requesting a zoning district change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service to allow for the construction of a 32,106 square foot Floral and Garden Center. PRELIMINARY PLAT/SITE PLAN 1. The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of Lot 1. Block 1, Eden Prairie Marketcenter into 2 lots and 1 outlot. Lot 1 is the proposed location of the Bachman' s facility. Outlot A is the location of the 1.1 acre NURP pond which serves this property. Lot 2, containing 5.59 acres is reserved for future development . 2 --------------------~ --~---- ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 c 2. Bachman's is proposing a 32,106 square foot floral and garden center on a 5.867 acre site at a Base Area Ratio (B.A.R.) OF 12.6%. The City Code allows 20%. Bachman's is requesting a PUD waiver to allow them to construct a 45,300 square foot outdoor sales and display area. City Code would allow a 3,210 square foot outdoor sales and display area. 3. The parking requirement for this project was calculated based upon the square footage of the building. Based on the Code requirement of 6 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of building, a total of 190 parking spaces are required. The plan depicts 200 parking spaces. The number of required parking spaces does not take into consideration the outdoor sales and display area. Because Eden Prairie's code does not specifically address parking for outdoor sales and display, the proponent has submitted parking details from other Bachman's facilities (see attached). In reviewing the data, Staff calculated parking to building ratios ranging from 5.8 spaces to 6.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area. Eden Prairie has a ratio of 6.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area. Based on overall sales area, figures ranged from 1 space per 363 square feet to 1 space per 422 square feet. The Eden Prairie facility is proposed at 1 space per 387 square feet. Both figures indicate that the • amount of parking provided in Eden Prairie is higher than most of the other Bachman's • facilities. These ratio's are also comparable to Frank's. Staff is comfortable that the parking provided will be adequate to meet the needs of the project. 4. Building and parking areas meet the minimum setback requirements for the C-Regional Service Zoning District with the exception of setback to parking along the east property line. Because of the shared access, the setback to parking does not meet the 10 foot code requirement. This typical in areas where there are shared driveways. A waiver through the PUD District Review is necessary to allow this to occur. 5. Access to this site will be from Singletree Lane and Prairie Center Drive. There is an existing median cut on Singletree Lane directly opposite Wal-Mart. A new median cut will be constructed in Prairie Center Drive which will provide full access to both the Bachman's site and the Naegele property to the west. These plans have been reviewed and the location approved by the Engineering Department. GRADING Elevations on this site range from a high point of 888 in the northwest comer of the property to a low point of 834 at the intersection of Singletree Lane and Prairie Center Drive. This site was previously graded and there are a total of 275 caliper inches of significant trees on the property . 3 • • • • ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 ( With development, 129 caliper inches will be lost requiring 80 caliper inches of replacement. The majority of the grading required for this proposal is to prepare a building pad and the outdoor sales and display area. The building pad has a floor elevation of 849 and will require minor cut and fill amounts of up to 9 feet. Retaining walls of up to 18 feet in height will be constructed along the north and east property lines to allow for the access drive from Prairie Center Drive and the construction of the outdoor sales area. The proponent will be grading and constructing the shared driveway along the east property line with this project. To ensure that access can be provided to the east from the shared driveway, a conceptual grading plan must be submitted for the adjacent property. The grading plan indicates 2 to 1 slopes along both road frontages in areas where there are planting beds. City Code allows a maximum of 3 to 1. A 2 to 1 slope is acceptable in these locations as long as the ground cover is of a variety that will hold the slope and not need to be maintained. A maximum 2.5 to 1 slope is acceptable in areas where sod is proposed to allow for mowing. Staff recommends that sod be used in all visible areas because of the prominence of this site within the "Marketcenter". UTILITIES Water and sanitary sewer services are available to this site. There is an existing 6 inch water line within Singletree Lane and an 8 inch sanitary sewer line within Prairie Center Drive. These services will be extended into the project to service the property. A 16 inch water line is proposed to be extended through the parking lot with a stub in Prairie Center Drive. This water line is part of the distribution system from the water tower. The City will pay for the cost of oversizing the line from an 8 inch to a 16 inch. Storm water runoff is proposed to be collected in a catch basin system within the project and discharged into a NURP pond located at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Singletree Lane. Construction by the City starting either this fall. ARCHITECTURE The Bachman's building is rectangular in design and measures approximately 100 feet wide and 280 feet long. The building is 19 feet in height which includes a 3 foot 8 inch parapet wall to screen mechanical equipment. If the parapet wall does not accomplish this, the City can require additional screening according to City Code . 4 ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 ( Because of the size of the structure, the architect has attempted to provide architectural relief on the front elevation. The building is designed with special brick work including circular accent brick detailing like that on the Wal-Mart and the Brunswick and greenhouse canopies over the entryways. To provide service to the building and the outdoor sales and display area, there are two trucks on the north end of the building. The northern most truck dock which services the outdoor sales and display area is not part of the building and is considered an outdoor loading dock. Outdoor loading docks are not allowed by City Code. According to the proponent, this dock cannot be enclosed because of the size of trees that are stored in the outdoor sales and display area. A waiver through the PUD is required to allow this. Primary building materials include face brick and glass on the majority of the building with scored, concrete masonry unit accent bands along the base of the building. Bachman's has agreed to match the colors of the other buildings in the area including Brunswick and the Flagship Athletic Club. Building material colors and samples will be available at the meeting. OUTDOOR SALES AND DISPLAY • The proposal by Bachman's includes a 32,106 square foot floral and garden center and a 45,300 • square foot door sales and display area. The enclosed retail portion of the Bachman's proposal is permitted within the C-Regional Service Zoning District. A waiver is required for the 45,300 square foot outdoor sales and display area because it exceeds 10% of the building floor area which the Code allows. City Code would allow 3,210 square feet of outdoor sales and display. With the exception of Frank's Nursery and Crafts, outdoor sales and display in Eden Prairie has been limited to the area surrounding Menard's. Uses with outdoor sales and display that exceed City Code that have been developed in this area include Menard's, A to Z Rental, Eden Prairie Ford and Suburban Chevrolet. In 1990, Frank's Nursery and Crafts was approved with 23,500 square feet of outdoor sales and display area along Eden Road. This approval was subject to complete screening of the outdoor sales area from Glen Lane and Eden Road. In addition, the proponent agreed to certain operating conditions as part of the Developer's Agreement (see attached). To be consistent with previous approvals, Bachman'~ is subject to the same screening and operating requirements. As a condition of approval for the waive~ granting outdoor sales and display, Bachman's shall agree as part of the Developer's Agreement to limit all outdoor sales and display to the area designated for such use. 5 • • • • ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 LANDSCAPING ( Based on the size of the building, 100 caliper inches of plant material are required for landscaping and 80 caliper inches for tree replacement. The landscape plan provides 206 caliper inches of significant plant material plus 383 shrubs of different varieties. Irrigation is provided to help ensure that the plant materials survive. The primary intent of the landscape plan is to screen the parking areas from the adjacent roadways and the outdoor sales and display area from adjacent land uses. Due to the lack of berming, screening must be accomplished by landscaping. The plan indicates that all shrub material is of a deciduous variety. This will only provide screening during the summer months. Staff recommends that the landscape plan be revised to reflect an equal split between deciduous and coniferous shrubs which will help to provide year round screening. Staff also recommends that additional planting be done on the 2 to 1 slope along the north property line to add depth to the plan and help with soil stabilization. Screening of the outdoor display area is proposed to be accomplished through the use of wood fencing supplemented by landscaping. An 8-foot high wood fence is proposed along the east property line for screening. The design should incorporate the same type of details used on the Wal-Mart fence. A waiver will be required to allow an 8-foot fence. Views from Singletree Lane will be screened by a double row of 6 foot, techny arborvitae and a wrought iron fence. LIGHTING Site lighting on the project will be combination of shoebox fixtures measuring 25 to 30 feet in height and decorative lights like those used at Brunswick Family World and Wal-Mart. The decorative lights will be used at the entrances to the project and in front of the building consistent with the Brunswick proposal. Decorative bollards will also be used in front of the building. The lighting plan shall be revised to indicate a double pole at the entrances to the project. The lighting plan indicates 1,000 watt metal halide fixtures. This wattage is higher than any in the area. Staff recommends that wattage be reduced to a maximum of 400. In addition, the decorative lights also provide some light level. The site lighting plan shall be revised to reflect the photometries of the decorative lights. This may allow the number of site lights or the wattage of the other lights to be reduced . 6 ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 SIGNING c Bachman's is proposing one building sign, a monument sign along Singletree Lane, and a pylon sign at the intersection of Prairie Center Drive and Singletree Lane. The proposed sign size information has been submitted and meets City Code requirements with the exception of size for the pylon sign. Maximum size allowed by Code for a freestanding sign is 80 square feet. The current proposal measures 126 feet. In order to meet the size requirement, Staff recommends that the gap between the two signs be closed. Additional details including color and letter style have not been submitted and are required prior to the City Council meeting. The preliminary streetscape plan for Singletree Lane indicates entrance monuments on both sides of the shared access drive. Rather than construct both a Bachman's monument sign and the entrance monument, Staff recommends that they be combined. This location will provide greater exposure for Bachman's along Singletree Lane. Staff expects that the design of all monuments will be the same and constructed out of brick. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS • As part of the TIF improvements for this area, sidewalks will be constructed along both sides of Singletree Lane. The design of the sidewalks was originally done in the design framework • manual for the Marketcenter area and will be further refined as part of a detailed design project currently underway. Like Brunswick Bachman's is required to pay the City for a 5-foot concrete sidewalk along their street frontage. This money will be used by the City for the construction of special design improvements including sidewalks, street lights, benches and trash receptacles. Internal connections are made to the building at the Prairie Center Drive access. This internal pedestrian connection along with a 10 foot pedestrian plaza in front of the building will allow for circulation within the project and ultimately connecting to the east. STAFF RECOl\1MENDA TION Staff recommends approval of a PUD Concept Review on 23 acres, PUD District Review with waivers on 5.867 acres, Preliminary plat of 12.57 acres into 2 lots and I outlot, and Zoning District Change from Rural to Commercial Regional Service on 5.867 acres based on plans dated August 12, 1993, the Staff Report dated August 20, 1993 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: a. Submit a comprehensive sign package for the project detailing colors and letter 7 • ------------------- • • • ( ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 styles. h. Revise the pylon sign to a maximum of 80 square feet. c. Relocate the monument sign to be part of the entrance monument. d. Submit building material samples and colors consistent with the immediate Marketcenter area and the Eden Prairie Marketcenter Design Framework. e. Revise the fence details to include design elements like those used at Wal-Mart. f. Provide a grading plan for the property to the east which shows how access will be provided. g. Revise the grading plan to reduce the slopes along Prairie Center Drive and Singletree Lane in areas that need to be mowed to a maximum of 2.5 to 1. h. Revise the landscape plan to reflect an equal mixture of deciduous and coniferous shrubs to help provide year round screening. The plan shall also be revised to reflect additional planting beds along the north property line for depth and slope stabilization. i. Revise the lighting plan to depict a decorative, double pole at the entrances to the project and to show the photometrics of the decorative lights. Reduce the 1,000 watt lights in the outdoor sales and display area to a maximum of 400. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall: a. Stake the grading limits with an erosion control fence. b. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. 3. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: a. b. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review and approval by the Watershed District. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer . 8 ( Staff Report Bachman's Floral and Garden Center August 20, 1993 4. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: a. Pay the cash park fee of $2,965 per acre. ( b. Pay the City the $5,000 estimated construction cost of a 5-foot concrete sidewalk, 400 feet in length in lieu of constructing the required sidewalk along the Singletree Lane frontage. This sidewalk will be constructed by the City. 5. Proponent shall agree to limit all outdoor sales and display to that area designated on the plan. Proponent shall also agree to other operating conditions such as those required for Frank's. BACHMAN.DRU • 9 • • • ( July 26, 1993 Mr. Chris Enger Eden Prairie City Center 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 .... . .. ~01 I ,y , .... fj ( " " ,. RE: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SALES AREA PER PARKING SPACE Dear Mr. Enger: Attached is a copy of the parking plan as it relates to the number of parking spaces per square foot of sales area in our Minneapolis, Rochester, Maplewood, Apple Valley, and Plymouth locations. Because of the nature of our product mix, primarily trees and shrubs, which are sold in an outdoor environment, we use a disproportionate amount of sales area per customer transaction compared to most retailers. We have found that at all of our locations, our parking facilities are very adequate. We normally experience about a 20% utilization of the space on a typical weekday and a 50% utilization on weekends. Because of the seasonality of our business, we only see full utilization of facilities on a few weekends in May, but because it is important to us to serve our customers efficiently at these times, we build our parking requirements for those periods. If you have any questions on our parking plan, please feel free to call me at 861-7645. Sincerely, Dale L. Bachman President DLB:cad Attachment BACHMAN'S SINCE 1885.6010 L YNDALE AVE. SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINN 55419. TELEPHONE 612/861-7600 BACHMAN'S, INC. SQUARE FEET OF SALES AREA PER PARKING SPACE JULY 26, 1993 LYNDALE AVENUE/mNNEAPOPS: ~ INDOOR SALES, including greenhouse 63,340 square feet ~ 388 stalls = 163 square feet sales area per parking stall GARDEN SALES, outdoors 77,510 square feet (0. \.;), I I tJ:JO TOTAL SALES AREA 140,850 square feet 7 388 stalls = 363 square feet sales area per parking stall NORTHGATE/ROCHESTER: INDOOR SALES, including greenhouse 10,000 square feet 7 64 stalls = 156 square feet sales area per parking stall GARDEN SALES, outdoors 17,000 square feet lo.4/1t{() TOTAL SALES AREA 27,000 square feet 7 64 stalls = 422 square feet sales area per parking stall WHITE BEAR AVENUE/MAPLEWOOD: INDOOR SALES, including greenhouse 34,000 square feet f 198 stalls = 171 square feet sales area per parking stall -Sl GARDEN SALES, outdoors 39,250 square feet 6.Bjltx::O ~ :';.0 C)--TOTAL SALES AREA 73,250 square feet ~ 198 stalls = 370 square feet sales area per parking stall APPLE VALLEY: INDOOR SALES, including greenhouse 34,000 square feet 7 212 stalls = 160 square feet sales area per parking stall GARDEN SALES, outdoors 53,488 square feet TOTAL SALES AREA 87,488 square feet 7 212 stalls = 412 square feet sales area per parking stall I.£;.:J /1060 • • • -!:) aC ...) • I Square Feet of Sales Area Per Parking Space July 26, 1993 Page 2 PLYMOUTH: INDOOR SALES, including greenhouse GARDEN SALES, outdoors TOTAL SALES AREA PROPOSED EDEN PRAIRIE LOCATION: INDOOR SALES, including greenhouse GARDEN SALES, outdoors TOTAL SALES AREA • 32,000 square feet 50,000 square feet 82,000 square feet • f 196 stalls = 163 square feet sales area per parking stall lool~/I~)) ~ t 196 stalls = 418 square feet sales area per parking stall 32,000 square feet t 200 stalls = 160 square feet sales area per parking stall 49,848 square feet 81,848 square feet T 200 stalls = 409 square feet sales area per parking stall (po~S 11mb ~ • l'lm 22 '90 13: 18 SECURry DEVELOPI·nIT 941 5492 ( P. ':./l 1 portion of, said seventeen (17) proof of parking spaces, a. deternlined by City, in the located as depicted in Exhibit B, attached h'ereto. 10. .Developer has submitted to city, and obtained City's approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property in the manner as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said mechanical equipment includes the gas m~:ters I electrical conc1ui t, and !.;ater meters in addition to standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee said screenIng shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, per city Code requirements. If" after completion of construction of said mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by City, in its sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not Ineet the Code reql.liremen ts to screen said equipment from public streets and differ.i.ng, adjacent land uses, then City shall notify Developer and Developer shall ta]<e corrective action to revise the mechanical equipment screening in order to meet Code requirements. . Developer ackno'Hledges tha t City will not release the security provided until any such corrective measure~ are satisfactorily completed by Developer. 11. Developer acknowledges the following operating requirements with respect to the Franks Nursery and Crafts use on the Property: A. All bulk ztorage, including, but not limited to , fertiliz~r/. dirt, sand, rock, mUlch, railroad ties, landscape timbers, bricks, patio blocks, sod, compost, fencing I hay, stra'H, manure, unpac)eed bulk items, and C:lny other such items art:' designated to be located and store~ in the IIlath house" area of the structure, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, r and at no time shall such bulk storage items be stored in any other location on the Property. B. All pallets are to be stored in the area designated for pallet storage as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and at no time 'shall pallets be s'tored in any other location on the Property I nor shall such pallets be stacJ.~ed so as to be visible above the ~rick screen wall enclosure along the west side of the Property. c. No sidewalk displays of materials, goods, supplies, equipment, or any other item associate.d with the llse shall be allm.;ed. D. outdoor storage shall remain in the area designated for outdoor storage as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. ) Developer agrees to such operating requirements as. part of the overall Planned Unit Development 2-90 approv;;\l for the Propt2rty. Developer acknowledges that any violation of any of said re~li:r;ements \v'ill cause ~r:eparable harm to thE! ci t.y of Eden. Pra~r~e and Developer spec~flcally acknowledges that City may seek to enforce said reqUirements by, temporary restraining order or • 12. 13. • • FROI'I:CITY OF EDEI'I PRAIRIE T-121 P,02 . ( ( "":! ., temporary injunction, as well as by all other remedies allowed to the city by law.. In addition, Developer agrees to pay all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, Which are incurred by the City in enforcing said conditions. City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the Commercial Regional Service District through the Planned" Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of Planned unit Development 2-90: A. Waiver from the required number of parking spaces to be provided for the uses on the Property from the required amount of 357 spaces to allow 278 spaces. B. Waiver to allow for greater than 10% outdoor storage within the Commercial-Regional-Service District to allow for the 23,250 sq. ft. of structurally screened storage as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. . . Developer and city acknowledge that Developer intends to subdivide the property into two lots in the near future, the north lot for ciatti's restaurant and retail use, the south lot for Frank's Nursery and Crafts, all as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. If, upon completion of such SUbdivision, City determines there is a violation of any term, covenant, or restriction contained herein involving only the north lot or only the south lot, city shall seek ~o enforce such term, covenant, or restriction against that particular lot, only . • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: August 31, 1993 SUBJECT: Boulder Pointe 5th Addition -Recommendation from the Planning Commission The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Boulder Pointe 5th Addition for 30 single family lots on August 12, 1993. Commissioner Schlampp noticed that only lots 3,4, and 5 were noted as requiring shoreland variances. He indicated that the drawings for Lots 1 and 2 and Lots 6 and 7 did not meet the required 120 feet of dimension at the high water mark on the lake or the required 120 foot dimension for lot width at the building line which is measured at 100 feet from the high water mark of the lake. City Staff responded that the preliminary plat as drawn did not include the land area to the high water mark of the lake. When this land area is added in, Lots 1, 2, 6, and 7 would meet the requirements. The plans in your packet clearly indicate that Lots 1 and 2 and 6 and 7 meet the requirements of the shoreland ordinance. The Board of Appeals granted approval of the shoreland variances for lots 3, 4, and 5 at the August 12th meeting. The Staff would recommend approval of the Boulder Pointe 5th Addition. .. ... ~ BOULDER POINTE 5TI1 ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING TIlE PLANNED UNIT DEVEWPMENT CONCEPT OF BOULDER POINTE 5TI1 ADDITION FOR ROBERT H. MASON, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Boulder Pointe 5th Addition PUD Concept by Robert H. Mason, Inc. and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1993; NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1993. 1. Boulder Pointe 5th Addition, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 2, 1993. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 9, 1993. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September, ATTEST: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • Exhibit A Outlot B, Boulder Pointe 2nd Addition • • BOULDER POINTE STH ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BOULDER POINTE STH ADDITION FOR ROBERT H. MASON, INC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Boulder Pointe 5th Addition for Robert H. Mason, Inc. dated September 2, 1993, consisting of 31.21 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of September, 1993 . Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • • Planning Commission Meeting Unapproved Minutes 5 August 9, 1993 B. BOULDER POINTE 5TH ADDITION by Robert H. Mason, Inc. Request for PUD Concept Review on 150 acres, PUD District Review on 31.21 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 31.21 acres, Preliminary Plat of 31.21 acres into 30 lots and one outlot. Location: Boulder Pointe Road and Mitchell Road. Sandstad stated that he didn't see the parking lot at Boulder Pointe Lake Park on the plans. Randy Travalia, representing Robert H. Mason, Inc., replied that the parking lot is on the original plan for the 1st Addition. Schlampp asked what the total number of lots is. Travalia replied that there are 30 lots. Schlampp noted that only 18 pads are shown on the plans. Travalia replied that the grading plan is accurate and that 12 lots are shown without a pad. Schlampp noted that lots 1-8 abut the high water mark, and lots 3,4 and 5 do not meet the lot width at the rear of the building line. Travalia stated that lots 3,4 and 5 do not meet the 120-foot requirement at the setback. Planning Commission Meeting 6 August 9, 1993 Franzen stated that Staff recommends approval per the recommendations in the last page of the Staff Report of • August 6, 1993. There were no comments from the audience. Sandstad stated he would like to find some way to keep the traffic to 30 MPH on Staring Lake Parkway. Kardell saw no major problems with the project. Wissner asked if there will be other builders in the project. Travalia replied that this will be the same as their other additions. MOTION 1: Kardell moved, seconded by Schlampp, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Kardell moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the city council approval of the request of Robert H. Mason, Inc. for PUD Concept Review on 150 acres based on plans dated July 29, 1993 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 6, 1993. Motion carried 6-0- o. MOTION 3: Kardell moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Robert H. Mason, Inc. for PUD District Review on 31.21 acres based on plans dated July 29, 1993 and subject to the Staff recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 6, 1993. Motion carried 6- 0-0. . MOTION 4: Kardell moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Robert H. Mason, Inc. for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 31.21 acres based on plans dated July 29, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated August 6, 1993. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 5: • Kardell moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Robert H. Mason, Inc. for Preliminary Plat of 31.21 acres into 30 lots based on plans dated July 29, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated August 6, 1993. Motion carried 6-0-0. • • • • STAFF REPORT TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Chris Enger, Director of Community Development Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner August 6, 1993 Boulder Pointe 5th Addition Robert H. Mason, Inc. Boulder Pointe Road and Mitchell Road 1. PUD Concept Review on 150 acres 2. PUD District Review on 31.21 acres 3. Rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 31.21 acres 4. Preliminary Plat of 31.21 acres into 30 lots and 1 outlot 5 . Board of Appeals variances for shoreland 1 -0 --1 ..J :,.. '1' .. -.. -I ~ lIJ "1~· :!: i:. ':.> " or f· .... &. !:D ::I .1. e~:B .. ou:lder Poin 5th TOWNHc:r~1ES • • • Staff Report Boulder Pointe' 5th Addition August 6, 1993 BACKGROUND Attachment A indicates the boundaries of the 1983 Red Rock Ranch Planned Unit Development for 525 units on 150 acres. This pun was a mixture of 118 single family homes and 407 multiple family units. In 1988 the City approved an amendment to the PUD reducing the number of units to 250 which included 88 multiple family and 162 single family. This portion of the 1983 PUD and 1988 pun was depicted for single family homes and a total of 30 lots. PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 23.86 acres at a density of 1.26 units per acre. This site is guided low density residential which would permit a density up to 2.5 units per acre. All of the lots meet the minimum square footage and dimensional requirements of the RI-13.5 Zoning District. SHORELAND ORDINANCE Red Rock Lake is a Recreational Development Water. Provisions of the shoreland ordinance apply to land within 1,000 feet of the normal ordinary high water elevation of the Lake (elevation 939.0). Lots within 150 feet of the Lake are classified as abutting lots and must meet the minimum requirements for a 20,000 square foot lot size, 120 feet of lot width at the building line, 120 feet of lot width at the high water mark and a 100 foot setback from the normal ordinary high water mark. Lots 1 -8, Block 2, abut the high water mark. These lots meet the minimum square footage requirements and are deep enough to meet the setback requirements and still provide room to build up to a 70 foot depth house. Lots 3, 4, and 5 do not meet the Lot width at the rear building line of 120 feet and Lot width along the Lake of 120 feet. The 1988 Boulder Pointe PUD was granted 3 shoreland variances regarding lot width at the high water mark and lot width at the building line. Reasons for granting the original variances (which may be applicable to this site) are: 1. The average shoreland lot size is 34,000 square feet which is larger than the 20,000 square foot minimum. 2. The 141 average foot lot width at the rear building line is larger than the 120 foot minimum. 3. The 145 foot average lake shore average per lot is greater than the 120 foot minimum . 2 Staff Report Boulder Pointe 5th Addition August 6, 1993 4. The grading limits for the project retain the existing Oak and Cottonwood trees along the edge of the lake which provides a natural screening of the homes. Based on these reasons, Staff supports the shoreland variances. GRADING AND TREE LOSS The entire site will be graded to accommodate the project as proposed with the exception of the Shoreland Lots 1-8. Approximately half of the lot would be graded in order to retain the slopes and vegetation along the lakeshore. The 1988 PUD had an overall tree loss of 33% or 2,826 inches. Tree replacement was 1241 inches. In 1990 the City amended the tree ordinance to include Cottonwoods as a significant tree. Therefore, the total amount of significant trees on the property has increased by 1300 inches to 9,866 total caliper inches. Adding the tree loss from the original PUD with the tree loss from this proposal, (138 inches) totals 2964 caliper inches at a 29% overall tree loss. Tree replacement would be 1,089 caliper inches. Since the Developer has planted 1,241 inches to • meet tree placement required for 1988 PUD, and since the recalculated tree replacement is 1,089 • inches, the Developer is not responsible for additional tree replacement on this project. UTILITIES City sewer and water is available adjacent to this site in Boulder Pointe Road. STORM WATER OUALITY Storm water runoff from the existing street system will drain towards a storm water pond on Lots 17 and 18, Block 1. Storm water runoff from this portion of the PUD drains in an easterly direction through 4 storm water ponds for discharge into McCoy Lake, east of Mitchell Road. All of the storm water ponds within the Boulder Pointe Planned Unit Development are existing ponds. SIDEW ALKS AND TRAILS The grading plan shows a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the westerly side of Boulder Pointe Road. This would be constructed concurrent with street construction. This sidewalk was a requirement of the 1988 Planned Unit Development. 3 • • • • Staff Report Boulder Pointe 5th Addition August 6, 1993 STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 23.86 acres into 30 single family lots based on plans dated July 19, 1993, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 6, 1993, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Provide detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Provide detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 2. Receive Board of Appeals approval for shoreland variances . 4 ............................................ . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . ... .. .. .. .. . .. . . .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .... .. . . . . .. . .. . . " .............. . . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . ... . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . " .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. " .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. , y of Eden Prairie ;. Offices 7600 Executive Drive. Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-2262 TOO (612) 937-8703 August 20, 1993 Bob Obermeyer Barr Engineering Company 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55437-1026 .. 'SUBJECT: Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Gu.ding and Eanh Moving Permit for Boulder Pointe 5th Additi<.,n Dear Mr. Obermeyer: • Robert H. Mason Homes requested that I write you a letter reg2..:'ding the status of the Ooulder Pointe 5th Addition projectsince this item was being scheduled for the September 1st Watershed District meeting. The proposed 30 lot subdivision was previously granted Concept approval for 30 lots as part of the Red Rock Ranch PUD in 1988. Since the land on either side of this project has been developed, and the intersections at Mitchell Road and Boulder Pointe Road are fixed, the development of this site for other than 30 single family lots seems unlikely. The Staff Report to the Planning Commission for the August 9th meeting, recommended approval. The Planning Commission recommends approval on August 9th. The project is also scheduled for review by the City Council on September 7th. I am also anticipating thaI the Council will approve the project as well. • If you need additional information or clarification, please call me at your convenience. 4~O~J Michael D. Franzen Senior Planner m: \obermeyer Recycled Paper ff, STATE OF [N]~~~©U& DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL METRO WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. RESOURCES PAUL, MN 55106 FILENO. PHONE NO. 772-7910 July 27, 1993 Mike Franzen city of Eden Prairie community Development Department 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 RE: BOULDER POINTE 2ND ADDITION, RED ROCK LAKE (27-76P), CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr Franzen: We have reviewed the site plans (received July 7, 1993) for the above-referenced project (Section 21, Tl16N, R22W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. Public Water Red Rock Lake (27-76P) is on the proposed site. Any activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation, which alters the course, current or cross-section of Red Rock Lake is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR permit. The OHW for Red Rock Lake is 840.5' (NGVD, 1929). 2. It appears that most of the stormwater is routed through settling basins, which is good. We would object to having the stormwater routed directly to Red Rock Lake. 3 . There should be some type of easement, covenant or deed restriction for the properties adjacent to the wetland areas. This would help to ensure that property owners are aware that the DNR and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers have jurisdiction over the areas and that the wetlands cannot be altered without appropriate permits. 4. The 100-year flood elevation of Red Rock Lake should appear on the plans. All the work that is done for this project must comply with applicable floodplain regulations of both the city and the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. 5. Red Rock Lake has a shore land classification of recreational development. The shoreland district extends 1000 feet from the OHW. The development must be consistent with City shore land management regulations. In particular you should note: a. The vegetation and topography should be retained in a natural state in the shore impact zone. The minimum shore impact zone is an area within 37.5' of the OHW. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • • • • Mr. Franzen July 27, 1993 Page Two b. Less than 25% of the area of each lot should be covered with impervious surface. c. The structures in the development should be screened from view from Red Rock Lake using topography, existing vegetation, color, and other means approved by the city. 6. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. 7. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. 8 • Construction activities which disturb more than five acres of land are required to apply for a stormwater permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Scott Thompson @ 296- 7203). Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, , ~k)J.~~~ Joe Richter Hydrologist cc: Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek WSD USCOE Eden Prairie File Eden Prairie Shore land File Red Rock Lake (27-76P) File Clty of Eden Prairie City Offices 7600 Sxecutive Drive. Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-2262 TOO (612) 937-8703 July 2, 1993 Randy Travalia Mason Homes 14201 Excelsior Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 SUBJECT: Boulder Pointe 5th Addition Dear Mr. Travalia: I have researched the files on Red Rock Ranch and Boulder Pointe to determine if this 31.21 acre site has zoning and preliminary plat approval. After reviewing the files and the Public Hearing Notices, I have determined that the property is currently zoned Rural, but has pun Concept approval for single family homes. If you have information that indicates the property has zoning and preliminary plat approval for 18 lots, let me know, so that your project can proceed to final plat. If rezoning and preliminary plat approval is necessary, you should apply for a PUD Concept Review on 150 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 31.21 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 31.21 acres and Preliminary Plat of 31.21 acres into 18 single family lots and one outlot. The next available Planning Commission meeting is August 9th. The first City Council meeting would be September 7th and second reading would be October 5th. The City's Development Review Committee reviewed the plans as a rezoning and preliminary plat request on July 1st. The following comments from that meeting should be incorporated into the plans: 1. There should be a 5' wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Boulder Pointe loop road. 2. Fire hydrant spacing should be no greater than 300' apart. 3. Use the standard engineering cul-de-sac design. 4. Pad sizes for the homes, especially adjacent to Mitchell Lake, should be comparable in size to homes that have been built in the Boulder Pointe 1st Addition. Recycled Pacer • • • • • Randy Travalia July 2, 1993 Page 2 5. Provide storm sewer computations and drainage area maps for the Engineering Department to review. Additional catch basins will be needed in the streets to pick up storm sewer water. 6. All storm water runoff must be pretreated to NURP standards. 7. An MWCC permit will be needed for sewer connection. 8. The preliminary plat should be revised to show lots adjacent to Mitchell Lake and include them as part of the rezoning request. This would save you 90 days of rezoning and plat review at a later date. 9. For trees lost within the construction limits, tree replacement will be required. It appears that some of the trees adjacent to the park would be lost due to construction. You may use all of the Cottonwood trees along the lake as tree inventory which should help keep the percentage tree loss and tree replacement to a minimum. A conservancy easement will be required on the slopes adjacent to the lake to protect the trees. The City is sensitive to your concerns regarding the processing and timing of your proposal for this year's construction season. Chris Enger and myself would be happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this matter further. Sincerely yours, ~?rJ Senior Planner m:\Travalia cc: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: August 31, 1993 SUBJECT: ViroMED -Planning Commission Recommendation from August 9, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the ViroMED proposal at the August 9, 1993 meeting subject to the following plan revisions to be completed prior to City Council review: 1. Add a sidewalk. 2. Add 66 caliper inches to the landscape plan . 3. Revise mechanical equipment plan to use metal panel. 4. Revise Phase II to keep building away from the trees. The above changes have been incorporated into the plans. The Metropolitan Council has also recommended approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial. The Community Development Staff would recommend approval of the ViroMED proposal . VIROMED LABORATORIES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF VIROMED LABORATORIES FOR OPUS CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the ViroMED Laboratories PUD Concept by Opus Corporation and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on September 7, 1993; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1993. 1. ViroMED Laboratories, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 2, 1993. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 23, 1993. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September,· ATTEST: Dou~las ~ .. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • • • • Exhibit A Legal Description ViroMED Laboratories Part of the NE 114 of the NE 114 of Section 1, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota . VIROMED LABORATORIES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Opus Corporation for ViroMED Laboratories requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 5.22 acres at Opus Circle Blue east of American Family Insurance. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of September, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • ( ~'i • STAFF REPORT • TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANTI FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: • • c Planning Commission Chris Enger, Director of Community Development Michael D. Franze~, Senior Planner August 20, 1993 ViroMED Laboratories Opus Corporation Opus Circle Blue, east of American Family Insurance 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 5.22 acres. 2 . 3. 4. PUD Concept Amendment on 5.22 acres. Rezoning from Office to Industrial on 5.22 acres. Site Plan Review on 5.22 acres for construction of a 50,550 square foot building . 1 ~O\ J ~. DR. ~L .-. ~ o w ( • • • ( Staff Report ViroMED Laboratories August 20, 1993 BACKGROUND ( In 1980 the City rezoned this site from Rural to Office for the construction of a 10 story, 150,000 square foot office building. Attachment A shows the approved site plan with parking on the west and the office building in the middle of the Oak wooded hillside. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE It is responsibility of the proponent to provide compelling reasons to the City for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Office to Industrial. The proponent's narrative responds to the five questions which the Commission and City Council have previously asked proponents to answer. The impact of this Comprehensive Guide Plan change on the balance of land uses in the community, impact on surrounding land uses, and impact on City services is negligible. The City has over 200 acres guided office which could accommodate a 10 story, 150,000 square foot office building. City services are available immediately adjacent to the site. A smaller building reduces traffic generation which is better for the existing road system . The key Comprehensive Guide Plan Change question is the impact of development on site features. There are two existing wetlands, and a hill of Oak trees. The previously approved project would have impacted the site features to a greater degree. The original site plan would have removed 556 additional caliper inches of Oak trees than the current proposal. If the project had been built in 1980, no tree replacement would have been required. Tree loss on this project is 29 %. The original project had no pretreatment pond whereas a NURP pond with this proposal pretreats water before discharge into the DNR wetland to the east of the site. An Army Corps wetland in the center of the site will be filled. The original plan proposed filling of this wetland also. Mitigation will be required. SITE PLAN The site plan depicts the construction of a two-phase industrial building totaling 70,000 square feet at a base area ratio is .26. The Industrial Zoning District would permit up to a .30 base area ratio. A total of 50,550 square feet would be built with the first phase. The first phase building meets the required 50 foot front yard setback to Blue Circle Drive and Crosstown highway. The building expansion encroaches into the 50 foot setback along Crosstown Highway in the southeast corner. The plans should be revised to meet the 50 foot setback for the expansion area . 2 ( Staff Report ViroMED Laboratories August 20, 1993 ( Parking meets the required setback for the Industrial Zoning Districts. The code allows one street frontage to be a 50 foot minimum setback (Blue Circle Drive). The code would permit a lot having two street frontages to have the other setback at 25 feet (Crosstown Highway). When the second phase of the project is built, a parking deck will be needed. The parking deck is a structure which is required to meet the 50 foot setback off Blue Circle Drive and Crosstown Highway. The plan indicates compliance with this code requirement. Parking is calculated based upon the proposed use of the building which is a mix of office manufacturing and warehouse. Parking for Phase I is 146 parking spaces. Parking for Phase II is 52 parking spaces. The site plan depicts a total of 198 parking spaces. ACCESS-VACATION OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR BLUE CIRCLE DRIVE • Access to this site is off Blue Circle Drive. There is existing right-of-way for Blue Circle Drive extension into the Northern Telecom site east of ViroMED. This road has not been constructed. Access is provided by private driveway from another location on Blue Circle Drive. If the road right-of-way is vacated by the City, a utility easement will be required since there is storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water within this existing right-of-way. Since part of the right-of-way • is within the City of Minnetonka, Opus Corporation is currently· requesting a vacation of that portion of the road right-of-way. If the road right-of-way is not vacated by either City, the project will require a building setback from 50 to 7 feet along this proposed right-of-way. Opus Corporation is requesting that the Planning Commission and City Council act on the PUD Waiver for reduced building setback. The request for the reduced building setback may have merit for the following reasons: 1. The project is a less intense development of the site than the approved 150,000 square foot office building. 2. The site is being developed at a .26 base area ratio whereas the code allows a .30 ratio. 3. The project preserves 71 % of significant Oak trees on site. 4. The project provides pretreatment of stormwater. If a NURP pond was not required, the project could be redesigned to meet the required setback. 3 • • • • ( Staff Report ViroMED Laboratories August 20, 1993 GRADING-TREE LOSS ( Grading will impact the significant Oak trees on the site. There are 2,602 inches of significant Oak trees on site of. which 749 inches or 29% would be removed due to construction. The amount of tree replacement required is 292 inches which is included on the landscape plan. If the second phase building expansion is built as proposed, an additional 100 inches of trees would be lost on the property, increasing tree loss percentage to 33 %. Tree replacement required is 81 inches. The plan should be revised to shift the expansion area away from the trees. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The proposed two story building will be constructed out of face brick and glass. The Industrial Zoning District would allow materials other than brick to be used on the building. The parking deck exterior wall should be constructed of face brick to match the brick on the building. The use of brick and glass around the building gives an office appearance. This may be another reason for considering the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan to Industrial. The mechanical equipment screening plan shows the location of rooftop mechanical equipment. Two of the units are proposed to be screened by wood screen fence which is not allowed by City code. The remainder of mechanical units are proposed to be screened by site line, meaning that the units are located far enough back from the building edge and should not be visible from public roads or adjacent land uses. The mechanical equipment screening plan must be changed to use metal panel required by City code for screening purposes. The final resolution on mechanical equipment screening is a determination by City staff after the units have been built. If the units are visible, the Developer will be responsible for screening. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required based on total building square footage is 219 inches (Phase I is 158 inches and Phase II is 61 inches). The landscape plan depicts a total of 445 inches of which 292 must be reserved for tree replacement. This leaves 153 caliper inches for landscaping required based on building square footage. The landscape plan should be revised to provide an additional 66 inches. The landscape ordinance requires screening of parking areas from public roads. Parking will be screened from Blue Lake Drive and Crosstown Highway with plantings. The landscape ordinance requires the screening of loading areas from public roads. The view of the loading area from Blue Circle Drive is screened by building and plantings. The view of 4 ( Staff Report ViroMED Laboratories August 20, 1993 ( the loading area from Crosstown Highway is screened by berm in Phase I and building in Phase II. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available immediately adjacent and north of this site. UTILITIES-STORM WATER OUALITY A NURP pond will be constructed on the northwesterly side of the building to pretreat stormwater before discharge into the DNR wetland to the east of this site. The NURP pond is sized to pretreat water from the parking areas only. If the NURP pond is designed to accommodate roof drainage, tree loss would increase as the building would have to be shifted further east. In view of the fact that the existing DNR wetland is a storm water detention pond for most of the Opus Planned Unit Development, and a City desire to save significant Oak trees, pretreatment of any portion of this property would be improvement to the storm water quality within the area. WETLAND MITIGATION The wetland in the center of the site will be filled. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has determined that mitigation for approximately 1/3 acre is required. Mitigation can occur on site, within the watershed or in the county. If mitigation occurs on site it could be an enlargement of the DNR wetland or creation of another wetland. In either case, additional Oak trees would be lost. If the on site mitigation option is pursued, Staff would suggest no additional tree replacement, since the site is being developed at a lower Base Area Ratio, the site provides a NURP pond and site is a less intense development impact than the approved plan. STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE. CHEMICALS. AND HAZARDOUS AREAS IN THE BUILDING The written narrative indicates an inventory of all hazardous materials and chemicals which will be stored within the building. The information indicates that the company is subject to many state and federal licensing regulatory agencies. These agencies perform periodic inspections of the company to insure compliance. 5 • • • • • • ( ( Staff Report Virol\IE]) Laboratories August 20, 1993 SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS There is an existing bituminous trail system in this area for transportation and recreational purposes. There should be a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk connection made from this building to this trail. This sidewalk connection would also serve a secondary purpose based on the attached letter from Diane Harberts, Administrator for Southwest Metro, who has indicated that the sidewalk will provide convenience and improved access to users of public transit in the area. CONCLUSION The Staff believes there are several reasons for considering the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. These include: 1. The site is being developed less intensely than allowed by City code which allows for preservation of 71 % of significant Oak trees on site. 2. The project will pretreat the majority of storm water from this site prior to discharge into a DNR wetland. The existing DNR wetland to the east of this site is currently a storm water detention pond for the entire Opus development. Therefore, this site contributes to improvement in water quality. 3. The building as proposed would be constructed out of brick and glass and has an office appearance even though the site would be zoned Industrial. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, PUD Concept Amendment, Rezoning and Site Plan Review on 5.22 acres for ViroMED Laboratories, based on plans dated August 20, 1993, and Staff Report dated August 20, 1993, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall: A. B. C. Revise the landscape plan to provide additional 66 caliper inches. Revise the mechanical equipment screening plan to depict the use of metal panel for mechanical equipment on the building. Revise the site plan to depict a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk connection to the existing trail system on Blue Circle Drive . 6 ~o17 ( ( Staff Report ViroMED Laboratories August 20, 1993 D. Revise the site plan to shift Phase II expansion away from the trees. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. B. Submit a final landscape plan and security amount. C. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over final fire code requirements. D. Pay the required cash park fee. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall stake the proposed construction limits with the snow fence and notify the City 48 hours in advance of grading. 4. A PUD waiver is granted for building setback from 50 to 7 feet. 7 • • • • • • I I , 3 a I f .. . OPUS PLAZA "~ BUILDING OPUS Z IEDEN PIWIIlE. III .... S0T4 \", " ", - '----- Attachment • • • .. , .. • • f! -. • en o ~ x- I f I I (.Innesota Department of Transpo(",tion Metropolitan Division August 26, 1993 Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Chrb Enger: . SUBJECT: Site Plan Review ViroMED Labs Waters Edge Building 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 North of TH 62, West of TH 169 Eden Prairie, Hennepin County CS 2773 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnIDOT) has reviewed a site plan for ViroMED. We tind the site plan acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments . • MnIDOT has access control along TH 62, and no direct access will he allowed. • Appropriate measures should be taken to preserve the trees if a permit is given to allow grading on Mn/DOT right of way. Please contact Bill Warden, of our Permits office, at 582-1443 for applications and questions ahout the permit process. • Highway nmoff must not be re-routed onto neighboring property as proposed. The current drainage pattern and rate of runoff must be maintained. Computations showing the existing and proposed condition should also be submitted when applying for a Mn/OOT permit. Filling of a Type l/Type 2 Wetland (not shown on the plan) will require Corp of Engineers permit. For information on drainage contact Bonnie Peterson, Hydraulics, at 593-8505. If you have any questions regarding this review please contact me. Sincerely, , jJiuJ'./,O ~L6J:.nO-J!U..1 jut.) Cyrus Knutson -D Transportation Planner cc: Les Weigelt, Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer • • • • • • ( ( METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Cellfre. 230 East Fifth Street, Sr. Pall/. MN 55101-1634 612 291-6359 FAX 612 291-6550 TTY 612 291-0904 August 25, 1993 Mr. Michael D. Franzen City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: City of Eden Prairie Comprehensive Pian Amendment ViroMed Metropolitan Council District 4 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15646-6 Dear Mr. Franzen: The Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the city's plan amendment received by the Council on August 13, 1993. The amendment proposes to change the land use designation of 5.22 acres from office to industrial. We have determined that the proposed amendment has no potential impact upon any of the metropolitan system plans. Therefore, the city may place the amendment into effect immediately. Because the proposed amendment appears unlikely to affect policies and plans in other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide, the Council will waive further review and comment on this amendment. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the city's plan in the Council's files. This concludes the Council's review. ~~ Dottie Rietow Chair DR:vef cc: Julius C. Smith, Metropolitan Council District 4 Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff Victoria Flood. Metropolitan Council Staff * Recycled Paper ff, STA~ OF [N][N]~~©u~ DEPARTMENT OF ( NATURAL RESOURCES DNR METRO WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 ~ 0 PHONE NO. 772-7910 FI N. August 25, 1993 city of Eden Prairie community Development Department Attn: Don Uram 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OPUS II SECOND EDITION, WET~~D 27-808W, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, NE~ SECTION 1, Tl16N, R22W, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Mr. Uram: We have reviewed the land development application for the above project dated 7/19/93 and have the following comments: 1. DNR protected wetland 27-808W lies immediately to the east of the site. A DNR Protected Waters Permit will be required for any work below the Ordinary High Water Elevation of the wetland. 2. si te stormwater management plans indicate that stormwater will be discharged into DNR protected wetland 27-808W. stormwater must be pre-treated before discharge into this wetland. Discharge of untreated stormwater degrades and can eventually destroy valuable wetland habitat. 3. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, a DNR appropriations permit is required. Please be advised that it takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. 4. No DNR shoreland management or floodplain concerns were noted. 5. Erosion control measures (which may include staked haybales , diversion channels, sediment ponds, or sediment fence) should be adequately designed, installed, and maintained for site characteristics, as outlined in "Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas« Best Management Practices for Minnesota" which is available from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Wayne Anderson @ 296- 7323) or an equivalent document. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • • • • Mr. Don Uram Page Two August 25, 1993 ( ( 6. The plans indicate that the applicant has received a USCOE permit to fill a small, onsite wetland. We recommend that you contact the Nine Mile Creek watershed district to determine your compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 772-7910. Sincerely, DIVISION OF WATERS C;.j.~~ Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist cc: Joe Yanta, USCOE Bob Obermeyer, Nine Mile Creek WSD City of Eden Prairie file ( WiJDOiJOiJ August 24, 1.993 Mr. John Rutford Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth street st. Paul, MN 55101-1634 . RE: city of Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for the property located north of Highway 62 and adjacent to the Opus 2 development. Dear John: Minnetonka City staff has had the opportunity to review the minor comprehensive guide plan amendment to allow industrial use of the vacant, 5.22 acre site in the northeast corner of the City of Eden Prairie. Upon review, we have determined that the request is compatible with adjacent guiding and zoning within the City of Minnetonka. Additionally, the proposed minor amendment will not change the overall intent of the Minnetonka comprehensive plan. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 939-8200. Sincerely, ~~ Project Planner /kk cc: ~n Perry, City of Minnetonka Director of Planning vRichael Franzen, city of Eden Prairie the city offices are located at 14600 minnetonka boulevard minnetonka, minnesota 55345-1597 office: (612)-939-8200 fax: (612)-939-8244 • • • • • • ( ( MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Franzen, Senior Planner FROM: Allen M. Nelson, Fire Marshal DATE: August 20, 1993 SUBJECT: Hazardous Chemicals -ViroMED I have reviewed the list of chemicals provided by ViroMED. The type and maximum quantities they have on hand are such that they will be under the exempt amounts for the Building and Fire Codes. This means they will be able to handle their storage and use with simple storage cabinets. There may be special requirements because of the biological hazardous materials. We will need to do more analysis with experts in the field to identify what requirements, if any, are needed for this. This will be done at the time of building permit issuance . ( ( SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612) 934-7928 Fax (612) 937-7411 August 10, 1993 MEMO TO: FROM: RE: Mike Franzen, Community Development Diane Harberts, Administrator ~ J " . ViroMED Laboratories -Opus Center Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed plans for ViroMED Laboratories_ Southwest Metro Transit Commission (SMTC) recommends that the concrete sidewalk be extended and maintained year-round to Blue Circle Drive. SMTC provides this recommendation because of the convenient and improved access that the sidewalk will provide for users of public transit. In addition, the sidewalk extension would connect to the established trail. • ViroMED Laboratories is located in a priority area targeted by both SMTC and the • Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) for reverse-commute transit services. SMTC and MTC have received numerous requests from employees that work at different businesses in the Opus Center to increase the level of public bus service available. One employer, American Family Insurance is the most aggressive employer to seek additional bus service to their facility. In a survey conducted at their site, over 40 employees expressed interest in riding public transit if service were made available to their location. American Family is located next to the site proposed for the development of ViroMED Laboratories. SMTC is projecting that increase bus service will begin to American Family Insurance and other locations in Opus in the Fall 1993. In addition, SMTC is conSidering the installation of a transit stop near this propose development. As SMTC has indicated in previous correspondence, there are other priority areas within Eden Prairie that SMTC has targeted as priority transit corridors. With input from Eden Prairie city staff and the 1494 TDM Corridor, SMTC is developing a Comprehensive Transit Plan that will identify all targeted transit corridors in Eden Prairie and service as a guide to developers. The final comprehensive transit plan will be presented to the Eden Prairie Council following the review and approval of the Southwest Metro Transit Commission board. Again, thank you for the opportunity to provide input regarding the proposed development for ViroMED Laboratories. Please call me at SMTC Offices (934-7928) with your questions or comments. • • • • ~ OPUS. (4'1 PUS Corporation 800 Opus Center 9900 Bren Road East ( Mailing Address P.O. Box 150 Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343-9600 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440-0150 612-936-4444 Fax 612-936-4529 August 4, 1993 00 ~LA!I~G ~p~ ill Michael D. Franzen Senior Planner AUG 0 ~~ 1993 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 RE: VIROMED LABORATORIES -SUPPLEMENT TO PROJECf NARRATIVE Dear Mike: This letter with the accompanying revised plans constitute our response to the comments of the Development Review Committee as well as supplements our narrative for the ViroMED Laboratories project. We are responding to each of the comments as follows: 1) We understand that this project will be scheduled for the August 23rd Planning Commission meeting. Due to the scheduling objectives for this project, we request that the City Council consider the first and second readings of the rezoning on September 7th and 21st respectively. 2) Our request for change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan is based on the following: 1. What impact does the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan change have on the balance of land uses in the City? The requested change should have a minimal impact on the balance of land uses in the City. The use is very similar to office but less dense in terms of people count and traffic generation. The building will be office-looking in appearance. 2. What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan change have Oil surrounding land uses? This site is located within the Opus 2 mixed use business park. The surrounding land uses are office and industrial in character. The proposed use will be consistent with the business park environment. 3. What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan change have on the site? 40 \ !: \ KS O!' (KEITI\!: SOI.l TIO'S 1953·1993 This project has been designed in a manner which is sensitive to the existing wooded hill and adjacent DNR pond. In many ways, the proposed project will have substantially less impact than the high rise office building and parking ramp, which was approved by the City in 1980. 1992 NAIOP National Developer of the Year Opus Corporation is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies -Architects. Contractors. Developers Austin. Chicago. Dallas. Denver. Houston. Milwaukee. Minneapolis. Pensacola. Phoenix. Seattle. Tampa ( ( ~. OPUS~ M. Franzen August 4. 1993 Page 2 3) 4. What impact does the Comprehensive Guide Plan change have Oil City services such as sewer, water, storm water runoff, and roads? This project will place fewer demands on municipal services than the previously approved office building. This site is serviced by City of Minnetonka utilities subject to a mutual agreement between the cities of Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. 5. Does the requested land use proposed by the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change result in a better use of the land? As previously discussed, the proposed land use will be developed in a manner which is more sensitive to the site than alternative uses. The building architecture has been modified so that all four sides will have the appearance of an office building. The loading docks are now oriented to the west with significant berming and landscaping provided as screening. Additional windows have been added along the southerly exterior facing Eden Prairie along the Crosstown. The building now presents itself as an office building from all four perspectives. 4) The current landscaping plan currently provides for approximately 436 caliper inches of new trees in conformance with the City's landscaping and tree replacement policy. 5) We are submitting a concept for the proposed future deck parking. The exterior face of the parking deck would be constructed out of materials compatible with the proposed building. 6) Truck access for the second phase is shown as part of the conceptual expansion plan. 7) Information identifying the type of hazardous waste. chemicals, and hazardous areas within the building is attached. 8) A mechanical equipment screening plan has been provided. 9) Two handicap parking spaces have been provided near the main door to meet ADA requirements. 10) The site plan now identifies sewer and water connections to the building. 11) A drainage area map and storm sewer calculations are now provided. 12) See response to Number 5 above. Per Dave Bangasser's telephone conversation with Allen Nelson. the fire protection system will be upgraded to compensate for the lack of access in the future. • • • • • • ~ OPUS . M. Franzen August 4, 1993 Page 3 ( ( 13) The plans show the proposed vacated road right-of-way on the site plan. 14) Enclosed is a copy of the approved development agreement for the original approved site plan in 1980. It indicates that substantial grading was to occur on the wooded hillside. The ViroMED proposal has a significantly less impact on the site's natural features. In particular, this approved plan resulted in the removal of approximately 1,308 caliper inches of trees versus the currently proposed 752 caliper inches. 15) The wetland fill plan has been submitted to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for their approval. We have requested a review by the Watershed District at their August meeting. 16) We have enclosed calculations indicating how much of the stoml water is being pre-treated. We have talked with Susan Roni at the Highway Department, and they have indicated that a NURP pond would not be allowed within the highway right-of-way. 17) Our proposed grading plan within the highway right-of-way is being submitted to MN DOT for their approval . Opus Corporation wishes to emphasize the attention which has been paid in this application to the total design with respect to minimizing its impact on the site, particularly when compared to the high rise office building plans approved in 1980. The ViroMED Laboratories project, upon total development, will have site coverage 13% below that permitted by City ordinance due to placing some of the development on a second story and through the use of a parking ramp in the future. The previously approved plan had substantially more impact on the existing trees with no tree replacement ordinance in effect. The proposed plan also meets NURP requirements to the greatest extent possible without further tree removal. NURP requirements were also not in effect at the time of the previously approved plan. The ViroMED Laboratories project will be a quality addition to the City of Eden Prairie. It respects the existing site to the greatest extent possible. We request your assistance in working with us to assure that the project can be implemented in a feasible manner. Sincerely, Michele Foster Director Real Estate Development MF:bb Enclosures 7. ( ( The Fire Marshal requires information which identifies the type of hazardous waste, chemicals, and hazardous areas within the building. This should be a report prepared by a Chemical Engineer. Company Operating Description Founded in 1982, ViroMed Laboratories began as a private, regional medical reference laboratory specializing in infectious disease diagnostic testing of patient specimens. Utilizing the Company's infectious disease testing expertise, ViroMed expanded its testing services to non-health care industries including the tissue bank, pharmaceutical (antiviral drug development and clinical trials), food, chemical disinfectant and medical device industries. In addition to performing testing services, ViroMed supplies tissue culture products (i.e., live cells) for hospital and medical reference laboratories throughout the U.S. and Canada. Regulatory Oversight and Standing The Company is subject to many state and federal licensing regulatory agencies (See Attachment A). These agencies' • regulations are very broad and include not only operational • requirements but requirements related to the physical attributes of the laboratory facility and the handling, storage an~ disposal of biological, nuclear and chemical hazardous materials (Due to the volume of these regulations, they are not included with this response.) These agencies perform periodic audits of the Company to insure compliance. ViroMed IS currently in good standing with all these agencies. Hazardous Materials All biological hazardous materials are properly stored in compliance with the regulations sited above. Biological hazardous materials to be disposed of are stored in marked waste containers provided by the Company's contract bio- hazardous waste disposer, BFI. BFI picks-up these containers twice a week or more often depending on volume levels. The Company produces a very small, annual amount of low- level, nuclear hazardous waste materials (3 H -Deoxythymidine 5': quantity -50mCi and 125 I -triphosphate iodinated DNA and antibodies: quantity-20mCi). This waste is properly stored • • • • ( ( in compliance with the reguhifions sited above. ViroMed has contracted with ADCO Services, Inc. to pick-up once a year this material and properly dispose of it. The Company has very small amounts of chemical hazardous materials on hand at anyone time (See Attachment B). These materials are stored in compliance with the regulations sited above including the use of a corrosive chemical cabinet and flammable cabinet. . " • v \..I VIROMED LA.TORIES, INC. Overview of state & Federal Regulatory Agencies REGULATORY AGENCY ISO SERO MyeO ellA ~ ~ ~ CAP ~ ~ ~ EPA FDA NRC ~ OPRR NCCLS ~ ~ ~ OSHA ~ ~ ~ State of IL ~ ~ ~ State of MN ~ ~ ~ State of NY ~ ~ ~ State of VA ~ ~ ~ REGULATORY AGENCY KEY: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments College of American Pathologists Environmental Protection Agency Food and Drug Administration Nuclear Regulatory Commission TB ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CUA CAP EPA FDA NRC OPRR NCClS OSHA The Office for Protection from Research Risks National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Occupational Safety and Health Administration LABORATORY ARTS MD CONT MB ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LABORATORY KEY: ISO Isolation SijRO Serology MYCO Mycology TB Tuberculosis ARTS Antiviral Research & Testing Services MD Medical Device Testing CONT Contract Services MB Molecular Biology TC Tissue Culture • -::1- TC I' rt .1 n "'-J CO ~ £ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 1- ~ • • • FAX 612 931 053i i( VIRo)IED UBS ( VIROMED LABS, IN . EXHIBIT B j: r HAzAJnous !lsscriPdon 2% ParaformaiBehyde 2 -Aminoeth1eSUlfoniC 2 -Propanol I Acetic Acid ' Acti vated Cha coal Acetone Butanol Chloroform DiaminobenZid~' ,e (DAB) Ethanol (Ethyl . cohol) Formaldehyde j Hydrochloric cid Hydrogen Per~~ide II " Liquid Descale j(AMSCO) II Isoamyl AlcOh~1 Methyl Alcoh I Monomethyl E her O-Phosphoric ~bid O-Xylene 98% I Phenol 5% and f% , Phenol trystal~ I Phenol Red Solution (0.5%) Phenol-Chloro~Jrm-Isoamyl !Alcohol Phenolphthaleid I .~; ..... ' CHEMICALS Maxjmum Qty 200 mls 200 mls 1 gal 1 pt 1 qt 1 gal 1 gal 1000 mls 25 gms 6 gals 500 mls 3 gals 500 mls 100 mls 3 gals 1 qt 100 mls 1 qt 1 pt 600 mls 200 mls 100 mls 500 mis 100 mls Potassium Dichromate :i Pyruvic Acid ~2-Ketopropiodic Acid) Reagent AICOhrll II 1 qt 100 mls 3 gal 1 gal 1000 gms Sulfuric Acid I Trichloroacetic' Acid 100 gms Tris: HCLPG Triton X-IOO i <t-octYIPhenrYPOlyethOXyethanOI) 150 mls I " j q i I I I f4J002' on Hausl ~ OPUS. July 14, 1993 Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Chris: ("PUS Corporation 800 Opus Center 9900 Bren Road East Minnetonka. Minnesota 55343·9600 612·936·4444 ( Mailing Address P.O. Box 150 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440·0150 Fax 612·936·4529 On behalf of ViroMED Laboratories, Inc., Opus Corporation is submitting a Land Development Application to permit the development of a new 50,550 square foot office/laboratory/warehouse facility on a 5.22 acre site in Opus 2. Our application includes requests for the following approvals: 1) Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from office to industrial. 2) An amendment to the existing PUD. 3) 1-2 zoning. 4) A vacation of a portion of Blue Circle Drive. 5) . A building setback variance from the north property line (in lieu of vacation requests above). 6) Dedication of a DNR ponding area. SITE. Lot 1, Block 1, Opus 2 Second Addition currently consists of 5.134 acres. In addition, there is another .09 acres of Blue Circle Drive, which makes the total site 5.22 acres. Opus Corporation requests the City to vacate the old right-of-way and replace it with a larger easement to accommodate the public utilities which are currently located in that area. The proposed right-of-way vacation and easement legal descriptions accompany this application. If this is not acceptable, Opus requests a building setback of 7 feet from the right-of-way line. The site consists of a significantly wooded hill on the eastern portion of the site with a flat, low, open area to the west. The flat, open area contains a wetland of approximately .35 acres designated by the Army Corps of Engineers. Opus Corporation has received a permit (Number 1993-03980-NW-JJY) to fill this wetland under Nationwide Pernlit #26. 40 \ t: IRS tI t' C:Rt: ITlIt: StlU Tin'S 1992 NAIOP National Oeveloper of the Year • • • 1953·1993 Opus Corporation is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies -Architects. Contractors. Developers -::z.1 _ Austin. Chicago. Dallas. Denver. Houston. Milwaukee. Minneapolis. Pensacola. Phoenix. Seattle. Tampa d. 0 ,..) t,C) • • • C. Enger July 14, 1993 Page 2 ( ( Lying to the east of this site is in an approximately four-acre pond designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. This pond currently accepts runoff from Highway 169 and the Crosstown. It is also part of the overall Opus 2 drainage system which was developed as part of the master plan for the park and approved under an Environmental Impact Statement done in the early 1970's. This development will not infringe upon the DNR pond. Opus Corporation is proposing to deed the two- acre part of the pond which is located in the city of Eden Prairie to the City. Opus Corporation is simultaneously asking the City of Minnetonka to accept title to the two-acre portion which is in its jurisdiction. Due to the numerous public purposes served by this pond as well as the multi-jurisdictional nature of its location, it seems appropriate that it be placed within public ownership. SITE HISTORY. In 1980, Opus Corporation received approval for a lO-story office building with a two-level parking ramp with 696 spaces. The proposed building was to have an east-west orientation and would have Significantly impacted the wooded hillside. These approvals were extended in 1982 for a two-year period and again in 1984. Since that time, the office market has been significantly overbuilt throughout the metropolitan area. It is highly unlikely that the type of development proposed in 1980 i.e. a high-rise speculative office building will ever be built on this site. These approvals were pem1itted to expire on December 19, 1986, when it appeared unlikely that this plan would ever be implemented. Opus Corporation has attempted to solicit interest in this site by companies who appreciate the environmental sensitivities and natural amenities of the site and Opus' and the City's desire for a high-quality project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. ViroMED Laboratories, Inc. has entered into a purchase agreement with Opus Corporation for this site in order to develop a 50,550 square foot first phase and ultimately 70,000 square foot office!laboratory/warehouse headquarters for its company. The building will consist of 11,100 square feet of office space, 28,750 square feet of manufacturing space, and 10,700 square feet of warehouse space. ViroMED Laboratories, Inc. provides diagnostic infectious disease testing in addition to performing testing services for the pharmaceutical, disinfectant, tissue bank, medical device, and food industries. ViroMED is also a leading supplier of cell culture products for hospital and medical reference laboratories through the United States and Canada. ViroMED Laboratories, Inc. currently leases space in Minnetonka witllin the Opus 2 Business Park. The new facility is being developed for their ownership. Construction will commence on the 50,550 square foot first phase building immediately upon completion of the governmental approval process and closing on the land. . The building is being designed to accommodate an approximately 20.000 square foot expansion to occur when business conditions warrant. C. Enger July 14, 1993 Page 3 ( ( Every effort is being made to design this project in a manner that balances the development with the significant natural features of the site. The building has been located to minimize the impact on the wooded hillside on the easterly portion of the site. Parking is then laid out in the open area to the west. Expansion of the building will occur to the south, again to minimize the impact on the wooded hill. In addition, the owners have committed to handle expansion parking through construction of a parking deck. The development preserves 85 trees (1,338 caliper inches) on the 5.22 acre site and an additional 29 trees (515 caliper inches) on the 2 acre pond site for a total of 114 trees (1,853 caliper inches). The development will remove approximately 29% of the total caliper inches. Full implementation of the City's landscaping and tree replacement policy would require trees consisting of 461 caliper inches. The site can feasibly accommodate 360 caliper inches which are shown on the landscaping plan. The building footprint for the first phase building covers approximately 17% of the site. A portion of the building has been located on a second level with an overall floor area ratio of 22%. The ultimate development is anticipated to have a base ratio of 26% with an overall floor area ratio of 31 %. • The architectural design reflects the owner's desire to project a high-quality corporate image of warmth • and scale. Toward this end, the style recalls images of English and French manor houses through the use of brick and cast stone. Overall, the building is divided into several smaller masses which are recombined and articulated to develop a clear sense of entry and human scale. In addition, the facility is sited to retain and enhance the natural qualities of its surroundings. The drainage. pattern for this site has been one of the most challenging issues to reconcile with the preservation of the wooded hill. Currently, drainage from the Crosstown 62 naturally drains through this site. In addition, we were informed that on-site runoff needed to be treated before it drained into the DNR pond to the east. The proposed drainage plan for this project includes a retention pond which treats the runoff for the parking area. The relatively clean roof drainage will be piped directly to the storm sewer system. This is the maximum size pond which the site can accommodate without a more significant loss of trees. While we understand that this proposal does not totally meet the City requirement for NURP ponding. We feel that it is the best balance between the hills, the woods, and water qUality. The DNR pond currently accepts runoff from the Crosstown and Opus 2 without any pretreatment. This pond is part of the overall Opus 2 drainage system which was approved and established under the Environmental Impact Statement Process in 1974. The standards for water quality have obviously changed significantly since that time. However, this single site will have only a marginal impact on water quality in the DNR pond. We feel that we have made a good faith effort to meet these objectives as well as trying to preserve the significant natural anlenities on the site. ~o32 • • • • ~. OPUS~ C. Enger July 14, 1993 Page 4 ( ( COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PUD AMENDMENT. Under the original master plan for Opus 2, the Comprehensive Guide Plan for this site was office/industrial. After Opus Corporation received approvals for the multi-story office building, it is our understanding that the City changed its Guide Plan in order to be consistent with the proposed land use. While the proposed development for ViroMED Laboratories will have the look of an office building, its use and function is most consistent with an industrial classification. Therefore, Opus is requesting that the Comprehensive Guide Plan be changed to accommodate the industrial classification as well as provide for 1-2 zoning. The proposed use will be consistent with the office and industrial character of the Opus 2 Business Park and will actually have less impact on City services than the multi- story office building which was approved in 1980. The proposed building has been designed to minimize the impacts on the surrounding natural environment. Overall, Opus Corporation feels that the proposed facility for ViroMED Laboratories presents a high- quality and sensitive solution for a site with significant constraints. We feel it balances the development with the natural environment. We request consideration of our application on the August 9 Planning Commission meeting . Sincerely, Director Real Estate Development MF/bb -, ( DEPA'RT~iNt-b3F THE ARMY ( ST. PAUL DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 180 E. KELLOGG BLVD .• ROOM 1421 ATTENTION OF Construction-Operations Regulatory (93-03980-NW-JJY) BRW, Inc. Ms. Beth Kunkel 700 Third street South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 Dear Ms. Kunkel: ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-1479 July 14, 1993 We have reviewed the information provided us about a project of OPUS Corporation to discharge 0.35 acre of fill to construct a medical research building in the OPUS II Office Park in an unnamed wetland. The project site is located in the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec. 1, T. 116N.: R. 22W., Hennepin County, Minnesota. This work is eligible for authorization by a Department of the Army nationwide permit referenced below and described in the enclosures, provided the enclosed conditions are followed. This determination covers only your project as described above. If the design, location, or purpose of the project is changed, you should contact us to make sure the work would not result in a violation of Federal law. ~ It is your responsibility to ensure that the work complies with the terms of this letter and the enclosures. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS AND APPROVALS BEFORE YOU PROCEED WITH THE WORK. If you have any questions, contact Joe Ycmta in our St. Paul office at (612) 220-0362. Enclosure(s) Sincerely, ~~a· Ch~ef, Regula ry Branch Construction-Operations Division Determination: 33 CFR 330-App. A, Nationwide permit number (26) • • • • • • ( Construction-Operations Regulatory (93-03980-NW-JJY) Enclosure B. Nationwide Permit ( .,j . ',~' 26. Headwaters and Isolated Waters Discharges. Discharges of dredged or fill material into headwaters and isolated waters provided: a. The discharge does not cause the loss of more than 10 acres of waters of the United states; b. The permittee notifies the District Engineer if the discharge would cause the loss of waters of the United states greater than one acre in accordance with the "Notification" general condition. For discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the notification must also include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands. (Also see 33 CFR 330.1(e»; and c. The discharge, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part of a single and complete project. For the purposes of this nationwide permit, the acreage of loss of waters of the United states includes the filled area plus waters of the united States that are adversely affected by flooding, excavation or drainage as a result of the project. The ten-acre and one-acre limits of NWP 26 are absolute, and cannot be increased by any mitigation plan offered by the applicant or required by the District Engineer. Subdivisions: For any real estate subdivision created or subdivided after October 5, ~984, a notification pursuant to subsection (b) of this nationwide permit is required for any discharge which would cause the aggregate total loss of waters of the United States for the entire subdivision to exceed one (1) acre. Any discharge in any real estate subdivision which would cause the aggregate total loss of waters of the United states in the subdivision to exceed ten (10) acres is not authorized by this nationwide permit; unless the District Engineer exempts a particular subdivision or parcel by making a written determination that: (1) the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects would be minimal and the property owner had, after October 5, 1984, but prior to January 21, 1992, committed substantial resources in reliance on NWP 26 with regard to a subdivision, in circumstances where it would be inequitable to frustrate his investment-backed expectations, or (2) that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects would be minimal, high quality wetlands would not be adversely affected, and there would be an overall benefit to the aquatic environment. Once the exemption is established for a subdivision, subsequent lot development by individual property owners may proceed using NWP 26. For purposes of NWP 26, the term "real estate subdivision" shall be interpreted to include circumstances where a landowner or developer divides a tract of land into smaller parcels for the purpose of selling, conveying, transferring, leasing, or developing said parcels. This would include the entire area of a residential, commercial or other real estate subdivision, including all parcels and parts thereof • (Section 404) ( ( Regional conditions: 1. Projects which would cause a loss (as described in 26.c., above) or more than three acres of waters of the U.S. are not authorized by this nationwide permit. 2. The notification requirements outlined at C. 13. below apply if the project would cuase the loss (as described in 26.c. above) or more than one-half acre of waters of the U.S. 3. This nationwide permit is not valid for any project that would cause a significant, adverse modification of more than 10,000 square feet of wetland adjacent to and within 1,000 feet of a lake or wetland that is greater than 10 acres in size, as designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources "Public Waters/Wetlands Inventory" maps. 4. This nationwide permit is not valid for any project which is located in waters, or in wetlands adjacent to and within 1,000 feet of waters, that are defined as any of the following: a. Outstanding Resource Value Waters in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7050. b. Trout streams as designated in Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Commissioner's Order 2450 Part 6262.0400 subpart 5. c. Trout lakes as designated in Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Commissioner's Order 2450 Part 6262.0400 subpart 3. , A list of the above waters is attached. 5. None of the nationwide permits are valid for regulated activities in, or in water or wetland areas which are within 1000 feet of a boundary of, a calcareous fen designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and listed in Minnesota Rule 7050. A list of these calcareous fens is attached. section 401 conditions: 1. Projects which include dredging in contaminated or polluted areas or that will disturb known contaminated sediments or polluted substances as defined and as listed by MPCA are not authorized under Section 404 by any nationwide permit unless the applicant applies for, and is granted, a project-specific Section 401 certification from MPCA. 2. Projects which involve utilization of fill or bank stabilization material which is comprised of demolition debris are not authorized by any nationwide permit unless the applicant applies for, and is granted, a project-specific Section 401 certification from MPCA. Demolition debris is defined by Minnesota Rules Chapter 7035.0300 Subp. 30 as solid waste resulting from the demolition of buildings, roads, and other man-made structures including concrete, brick, bituminous concrete, untreated wood, masonry, glass, trees, rock, and plastic building parts. • • • • • • ( ( Conditions Prescribed by Corps Regulation: .~: ... Refer to the attachments for the conditions that are applicable to all of the nationwide permits . , ( ( Co Nationwide Permit Conditions General C..onditions: The following general conditions must be followed in order for any authorization by a nationwide permit to be valid: 1. Navigation. No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. 2. Proper maintenance. Any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety. 3. Erosion and siltation controls. Appropriate erosion and siltation controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. 4. Aquatic life movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species which normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. 5. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands must be placed on mats or other measures muSt be taken to minimize soil disturbance. 6. Regional and case-by~ conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions which may have been added by the division engineer (see 33 CFR 330.4(e» and any case specific conditions added by the Corps. 7. Wild and Scenic Rivers. No activity may occur in a component of tbe National Wild and Scenic River System; or in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study riverft for possible inclusion in the system, while the river is in an official study status. Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the National Park Service and the U.s. Forest Service. 8. Tribal rights. No activity or it<; operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights an~treaty fishing and hunting rights. 9. Water quality certification. In certain states, an individual state water quality certification must be obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(c». 10. Coastal zone management. In certain states, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained or waived. (see 33 CFR 330.4(d». 11. Endangered Species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act, or which is likely to destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. Non-federal permittees shall notify the district engineer if any listed species or critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the Endangered Species Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained from the U.S. FIsh and Wildlife Service and National Marine FISheries Service. (see 33 CFR 330.4(f) 12. Historic prooerties. No activity which may affect Historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in tbe National Register of Historic Places is authorized, until the DE has complied with the provisions of 33 CFR 325, Appendix C. The prospective permittee must notify the district engineer if the authorized activity may affect any historic properties listed, determined to be eligible, or which the prospective permittee has reason to believe may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and shall not begin the activity until notified by the District Engineer that the requirements of the National Historic Pres.ervation Act have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. Information on the location and existence of historic resources can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office and the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 eFR 330.4(g)). • • • B R W INC. Planning Transportation Engineering Urban Design • Thresher Square 700 Third Street So. Minneapolis, MN55·n5 612/370-0700 Fax 61213,0-1378 Minneapolis Phoenix Denver Orlando San Diego Seattle Don..ud W. Ringrose Richard P. Wolsield Peter E. Jan'is Thomas F. Carroll Craig A .. \:nundsen Don..ud E. Hunt John B. ~!c:\.:lmara Richard D. P;l-;rim D;lie~. &([.;:r~lnn • Jeifrey L. fk!'son ~ph C. Blum C.:lry J. Erickson Jt'hn C. Ly n-:h P.lul ~. B.w ( May 7, 1993 Mr. Joe Yantci. Army Corps of Engineers 180 East Kellogg Blvd., Rm 1421 St. Paul, MN 55101-1479 ( ..... : ... M/~ '( 1 0 1993 Re: Nationwide Permit Notification for fill within an isolated wetland within the OPUS II Office Park in Eden Prairie; NE NE Sec; 1, T116N, R22W. Dear Joe: Enclosed you will find a site plan showing the limits of the isolated wetland basin that is to be filled during the construction of a medical research building. The property owner is OPUS Corporation, PO Box 150, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55440. The site is approximately five acres in size; the wetland is less than 0.5 acres. The wetland is made up of a small area of open water, that appears to have been excavated given the number of spoil piles in and around the wetland. The area around the open water is dominated by reed canary grass. A , shallow drainageway is present along the east edge of the basin which directs water away from the basin and into the larger DNR pond to the east. The ditch elevation is at 917.8. The current water level of the wetland is approximately 917.0. The high water level of the wetland is estimated to be less than elevation 918.5. The wetland was delineated on April 26, 1993, by BRW using the 1989 and 1987 federal delineation methods. The wetland edge falls within the elevations of 918.5 and 919.5. The wetland is approximately 15,500 square feet, or 0.35 acres, in size. The proposed development requires at least a 50,000 square foot building, with room for future expansion. Given the size of the site and the location of the wetland, there is no feasible way to avoid this small wetland basin and still meet the needs of the proposed development and the requirements_of the City. The City has required the developer to save the stand of oak woods that lies to the east of the small wetland. , -------. ( ( It is our understanding that the proposed filling of this small, isolated wetland basin is covered under nationwide permit number 26. The developer intends to fill this wetland basin during the 1993 construction season. I 'request, for our files, that the Corps review and verify that the proposed activity described herein is covered under the nationwide permit program. Thank you for taking the time to review this matter. Sincerely, g~uJ'd Beth Kunkel Wetland Specialist Enclosure cc: ~Michelle Foster, OPUS File # 1924AOO • • • • • • ( ( PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION DESCRIPTION That part of Blue Circle Drive as dedicated in the plat of OPUS II 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin county, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line described as commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, said OPUS II 2ND ADDITION; thence easterly along a north line of said Lot 1 a distance of 251.60 feet to a point of curvature, being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly and at a right angle a distance of 33.00 feet to the north line of said OPUS II 2ND ADDITION and said line there terminating. PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION That part of vacated Blue Circle Drive and Lot 1, Block 1, OPUS II 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the northwest of said Lot 1; thence South 85 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds East, assumed bearing, along a north line of said Lot 1 a distance of 251. 60 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence South 4 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 5.00 feet; thence northeasterly a distance of 185.90 feet along a curve radial to the last described line, concave to the north and having a radius of 448.24 feet and a central angle of 23 degrees 45 minutes 43 seconds to the most northerly line of said Lot 1; thence North 85 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds West along said most northerly line of Lot 1 and its westerly extension a distance of 180.61 feet to its intersection with a line which bears North 4 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 4 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 33.00 feet to the point of beginning . VACA 770N AND EASEMENT SKETCH FOR : ~ OPUS CORPORA TlON 1)/1//1 u/-, / /-, NORTH LINE OF OPUS " 2ND ADDITION -UG TELE ______ _ ,-. "1 /"1 /"1 / C./ (../ '? 1\ / I) L-I VU PROPOSED STREET VACATION N85°49'52"W ------ -~.,,- : ci : 0 : ,« ° I O'08"W.·~\ ------S4 00 : 0 \ : I-z -,: 0", : -J .: - '...,J: lL. Ul ' ....... : 0:::;, "':; 'i cr a. ~~: lLJ 0 ,: Z ~(-i cr_' " : o~ I i Uu 1...1 i ~ 53 . ..... : "7 m 0 : -0 :, « , : > >i '< -'0 '<: , Z ': C'\ I-'" " -: .J 0 (: ..... -J= -i I...... lL.Ul " ): r-....... 0:::;' . a. ~ ....... I '...... lLJ 0 J -f ( '\ ~_" ,. ...J -J I Ii (~ I-G ...,J: Ul 0 : lLJ-J ~I "C ~m C ~ ~O ~ _r:.... 5. A NORTH LINE OF LOT I f\ [) / / ~ v' LJ-.../ .... .., I A • T I '" n ... " c:-I <:" 1<:" o "It , A Ann"lt nUll"! /1""- L. V / , , I I , __ / (\/"\1.(/ C:J L _vvf \ o " 1 (\ L-' "U • /f ~~~~/ ",/ ,0' " s'i-~ /" _ 0 s/" '\~\..~ .. _-......... " S'\ ",)0 In 1\ / Iv/V MOST N'L Y LINE OF LOT I II (\(\,-r'[l'" r\UUIIIVI'i I SCALE: I INCH=.30 FEET PREPARED : JULY 9,199.3 ~ r'1 • • • After some discussion, Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOP~NT'DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7; ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of ~den Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. On September 22, 1981, this Council designated under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124. to 469.134, as amended, certain land within tre Cit.Y as Development District No. 1 (:.he "De"Jelopment District") and adoptea a Development Program therefor. The Development Program was subsequently amended by this Council-On March 30, 1982, May 17, 1983, April 17, 1990, Apri.l 7, 1992 and May 19,1992 (as so amended, the "Original Program"). Pursuant to the ~innesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended (the "Act"), this Council has established Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 (collectively, the "Districts") within the Dev,elopment District and has adopted and in some cases amended Tax Increment Financing Plans therefor (as originally adopted or, if amenaed, as so amended, the "Original Plans") on t.~e dates indicated'below: Tax Increment Date of Adoption District No. or Modification 1 9/22/81; modified 3/20/82, 5/17/83, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 2 2/20/82; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 3 11/16/82; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 4 3/15/83; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 Tax Increment District No. 5 6 7 Date of Adoption or Modification 5/17/83; modified 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and .5/19/92 8/16/83; ~odified 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 4/17/84; ~odified 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 1.02. It has been proposed that the City further amend its Development Program (the "Program Amendment") in order • to enlarge the geographical area of the Development District and to amend the Original Plans (the "Plan Amendment") to provide for the payment of some of the capital and administrative costs to be incurred ,by the City in undertaking the development activities authorized by the Program Amendment within the enlarged' Development District. The Program Amendment has been transmitted to the planning agency of the City, which has deLermined that the Original Program as amended and supplemented by the Program Amendment (as so amended and supplemented, the "Program") conforms to the general plan for the development of the City. 1.03. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.126 and 469.175, the adoption of the Program Amendment and Plan Amendment is for the consideration of this Council. 'On September 7, 1993, this Council conducted a public hearing on the desirahility of adopting the Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment. Notice of the public hearing was duly published as required by law in the ~n Prairie News, the official newspaper of the City on , 1993. 1.04. Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 272 and the Board of Education of Independent District No. 287 were given an opportunity to meet with the City and C0mment on the Plan Amendment. At least 30 days before the public hearing the City provided the county and the school district boards with information on the fiscal and economic implications of the Plan Amendment. Section 2. Adoption of Program Amendment. On the basis of the proposed Program Amendment prepared by officers of the City and the information elicited from consultation with the planning agency and at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 2.01. The Council hereby ratifies and confirms its determination that there is a need for new development in the area of the City encompassed by the enlarged Development District to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the st3te. The Council hereby finds that the proposed development activities to be undertaken in the Development District as enlarged pursuant to the Program Amendment would improve the Development District by encouraging private development of property therein, thereby increasing employment and the tax base of the City and overlapping tax jurisdictions. It is in the best interests of the City to adopt the Program Amendment . • • • • • 2.02. Upon review of the Program, the information elicited from the planning agency and at the public hearing, and on the basis of the findings made in Section 2.01, this Council hereby adopts the Program Amendment and orders that it be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. SectIon '3. Approval of Plan Amendment. On the basis of the Plan Amendment and the information elicited at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 3.01. The Plan Amendment provides the means to finance the costs of the development activities to be undertaken in the enlarged Development District pursuant to the Program Amendment. The Original Plans, as amended and supplemented by the Plan Amendment (as so amended and supplemented, the "Plans") contain a statement of objectives for the improvement of the Development District, a statement as to the development program for the respective District and a statement of the property within the Development District which the City intends to acquire. The Plans also estimate the capital and administrative costs of the Development District, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, the sources of revenues to finance or otherwise pay public costs of the respective District, the captured net tax capacity of the respective District at completion and the duration of the District. The Plans also describe and identify the development activities to be undertaken or expected to be undertaken in each District. The Plan Amendment further contains an estimate of the impact of the proposed tax increment financing on the net tax capacities of all taxing jurisdictions in which each District is located. All the captured tax capacity is necessary for the objectives of each District. 3.02. This Council hereby finds that the proposed development of the enlarged Development District to be encouraged pursuant to the Program Amendment would not, in the opinion of this Council, occur solely through private investment wit~in the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is necessary. The development activities to be undertaken in the enlarged Development District are necessary in order to permit additional development to occur within the Development District. 3.03. This Council hereby finds that the Plans conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Under the general plan for tLe development of ~he City the Districts are zoned so as to permit the uses proposed by the Program Amendment . 3.04. This council hereby ratifies and confirms that the Plan Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of each of the Districts by private enterprise. The development activities contemplated in the Program Amendment would provide an opportunity for a significant increase in employment opportunities in the City and enhance the tax base of the City. 3.05. Upon review of the Plans, the information elicited at the public hearing 'and on the basis of the findings in Sections 3.01 to 3.04, this Council hereby approves the Plan Amendment. Section 4. Filinq. The Finance Director/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment with the Commissioner of Revenue as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2. Mayor Attest: Finance Director/Clerk • • • • • • 1993 AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 and 1993 AJ~NDMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7 September 7, 1993 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA I. INTRODUCTION The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota • (the "City") has determined that there is a need for the development of an area of the City designated as Development District No.1 (the "Development District"), and has adopted a development program therefor, dated September 22,' 1981' and subsequently amended on March 30, 1982, May 17, 1983, April 17, 1990~ April 7, 1992 and May 19, 1992 (as so amended, the "Original Program"), for development of the Development District. It is now necessary to amend the Original Program to increase the geographical area of the Development District. The actions to be taken by the City pursuant to this 1993 Amendment to Development Program (the "Program Amendment") are necessary to secure the development of the property included in the Development District at this time and in a manner which will best meet the needs of the City. In order to finance the capital and administration costs to be incurred by the City in connection with the Development District, the City adopted, and in certain c,ses nodified, on the dates indicated below tax increment financing plans (as so modified, the "Original Plans") for the following Tax Increment Districts (collectively, the "Districts"): Tax Increment Date of Adoption Dis+.:rict No. or Modification 1 9/22/a1; modified 3/20/82, 5/17/83, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 2 3/20/82; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 3 11/16/82; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/~2 and 5/19/92 4 3/15/83; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 Tax Increment District No. 5 6 7 Date of Adoption or Modification 5/17/83; modified 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 8/16/83; modified 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 4/17/84; modified 4/17/90, 4/7/92 and 5/19/92 It is now necessary to amend the Original Plans by the following Plan Amendment to authorize the expenditure of tax increment revenues, on hand or to be collected, in the enlarged Development District. The Plan Amendment will not authorize the incurrence of additional bonded indebtedness or change the boundaries or the legal durat~on of any of the Districts. • • • • • The Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment are adopted by the City Council of the City pursuant to the Development District Act, now codified at Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, as amended, and the Tax Increment Financing Act, now codified at Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended. ',. II. 1993 AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 A. Geographical Area of the pevelopment pistrict. The geographical area of Development District No.1 is hereby amended to include all of the property described on Exhibit I-A attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. Environmental Controls. It is presently anticipated that the Development Activities proposed in the Development District as enlarged by this Program Amendment will not present major environmental problems. All municipal actions, public improvemeats a.ld private development will be carried out ~_n a manner that will comply with applicable environmental standards. C. Estimated Cost of 1992-2 Project. The estimated costs associated with the 1992-2 Project are not changed by this Program Amendment, and remain at $17,200,000, including acquisition, relocation, demolition and site clearance costs, public improvement costs, the cost of professional services for planning, design, engineering and appraisals, contingencies, and administration costs calculated at 5%. It is anticipated that the elements of the costs of the 1992-2 Project may decrease or increase, but that the total costs will not exceed the amount shown above. D. Effect of Program Amendment. Except as amended and supplemented by this Program Amendment, the Original Program remains in full force and effect and its provisions apply to ~he provisions of this Program Amendment, except to the extent amended or supplemented hereby . -2- III. PLAN AMENDMENTS ~ A. Use of Tax Increment Reyenues in the Enlarged Deyelopment District. The estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992-2 Project will include Capital and Administrative Costs incurred in the Development District as enlarged by the Program Amendment. Tax increment revenues will be expended in payment of such Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992-2 Project. B. Estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992-2 Project. The estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the 1992-2 Project will not be greater than the estimated Capital and Administrative Costs set forth in the Original Plans. C. Payment of Capital and Administratiye Costs. 1. In General. 1'.11 Capital and Administrative COSl:.S of the 1992-2 Project will be paid from Tax Increment derived from the Districts. The City reserves the right to levy special assessments to finance in whole or in part the costs of the 1992-2 Project. 2. Bonded Indebtedness To Be Incurred. No indebtedness evidenced by Tax Increment Bond~ will be incurred in connection with the 1992-2 Project. The City reserves the right to issue Special Assessment Bonds to pay, if necessary, costs of the 1992-2 Project. D. Fiscal and Economic Implications of Plan Amendment. The Plan Amendment has no fiscal and economic implication apart from those specified in the Original Plans since the Capital and Administrative Costs will not be greater than those set forth in the Original Plans. E. Effect of Plan Amendment. Except as amended and supplemented by this Plan Amendment, each of the Original Plans remains in full force and effect and its provisions apply to the respec~ive provisions of this Plan Amendment, except to the extent amended or supplemented hereby. -3- ~ ~ • • • This Program Amendment and this Plan Amendment were adopted by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota on the 7th day of September, 1993. Mayor Attest: City Clerk -4- "EXHIBIT I-A Legal Description of Geographic Boundaries of Development District No. 1 Beginning at the Northeast comer of Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, thence South along the East line of said Section to the North shoreline of Anderson Lake. Thence Westerly and Northerly along said shoreline to the Southerly extension of the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, thence North along said West line to a point 250' South of Southerly right-of-way line of W. 78th Street, thence West 250' parallel to said right-of-way line, thence South 86° 49' 48" West 92.80', thence South 34 ° 07' 30" West 420', thence South 07° 07' 30" West 153.45', thence South 46° 55' 30" East 141.63', thence South 4r 08' 55" East 255.74', thence South 49° 07' 10" West 190.03', thence North 59° 20' 19" West 105.2,°" thence North 48° 54' 36" West 180.96', thence North 55° 42' 32" West 123.12', thence North 52° 19' 01" West 82.04', thence North 53° 01' 35" West 228.14', thence South 74':' 31' 07" West 254.75', thence South 22° 46' 26" West 162.32' ,thence Nurth 72° 08' 25" West 217.16', thence North 36° 42' 04" West 267.15', thence North 0° 52' 30" West 37.24', thence South 87° 00' 36" West 487.65', thence North 72° 32' 50" West 257.53', thence North 60° 43' 31" West 418.89', thence North 29° 11' 58" West 387.18', thence North 0° 32' 55" West 31.64', to the South right-of-way line West 78th Street, thence West along said Southerly right-of-way line to its intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of Schooner Boulevard, thence Southerly along said Easterly right-of-way line to its intersection with the Northerly property line of Tract H, R.L.S. 1509, thence South 73° 35' 39" East 306.39', thence South 87° 02' 16" East 855.00', thence South 10° 06' 21" East 539.18', thence South 21 ° 30' 05" East 105.40', thence South 51 ° 20' 25" East 115.26', thence South 82° 23' 01" East 173.53', thence North 74 ° 53' 11" East 141.91', thence South 84 ° 48' 20" East 143.59', thence North 75° 39' 52" East 92.89', thence South 48° 20' 18" East 169.99', thence South 02° 51' 45" East 140.17', thence South 11 ° 18' 36" East 152.97', thence South 26° 33' 54" East 321.99', thence South 19° 37' 04" East 321.67', thence South 33° 01' 26" East 214.68', thence South 59° 21' 52" East 239.42', thence South 03° 50' 14" West 164.37', thence South 06° 40' 48" West 223.52', thence South 31 ° 59' 47" West 84.49', thence South 15° 49' 21" West 123.10', thence South 24 ° 30' 20" West 40.24', thence South 35° 08' 12" West 58.01', thence South 09° 10' 30" West 90.60', thence South 21 ° 10' 30" West 63.40', thence South 30° 09' 23" East 168.17', thence North 70° 38' 37" West 104.00', the'1c~ South 79° 58' 37" West 271.74', thence North 61 ° 54' 45" West 66.59', thence North 36° 57' 26" East 180.00', thence North U~O 24' 34" West 189.04', thence North 79° 20' 34" West 187.36', thence North 08° 54' 34" West 300.40', thence North 28° 07' 00" West 205.38', thence North 4~0 34' 34" West 213.73', thence North 72° 48' 34" West 261.91', thence North 65° 49' 34" West 350.63', thence on a curve 275.04' chord bearing South 49° 17' 56" West, having a radius of 796.57' and a central angle cf 19° 47', thence North 87° 10' 34" West 649.98', thence South 1° 31' 26" East 102.77', thence North 82° 22' 32" West 250.23', thence North 89° 38' 39" West 1035.40' to the Easterly right-of-way line of Preserve Boulevard, thence Northerly along said Easterly right- of-way to its intersection with the South right-of-way line of Schooner Boulevard, thence North 1 ° 15' 55" East 110.76' along said South right-of-way, thence Westerly along said Southerly right-of-way line to its intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of Franlo Road, thence Southerly along Easterly right-of-way line of Franlo Road 800' +1-, thence West to West line I-A-l • • • • • • of the Southeast Quarter of the Soutneast Quarter of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22, thence South along said West line to its intersection with the South line of Section 14, Township 116, Range 22, thence West along said South line to the Southeast comer of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, thence North along the East section line of Section 15 to the South line of Outlot A Fountain Place Apartments, thence Westerly along said South line of Outlot A .to the West line of Fountain Place Apartments, thence South along said West line to the South line of Section 15, thence West along South section line to the East line of Outlot A Eden Place Apartments, thence Southwesterly along said East line to intersection with the Northerly right-of-. way line of Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence across Anderson Lakes Parkway to a point of intersection (said point of intersection is the North line of Block 1 Research Farm 3rd Addition and the Southerly right-of-way line of Anderson Lakes Parkway), thence Southwesterly along the Northerly line of Block 1 to the Westerly line of said Block 1, thence Southerly along West line to Northerly right-of-way line of Staring Lake Parkway, thence Southeasterly to a point on the South line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22 507.62' East of the Westerly corner of Outlot C Research Farm 3rd Addition, thence continuing Southeasterly along West line of Outlot C to the most Southwestern comer of Outlot C, said Southwesterly comer being 890' East of West line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, thence South parallel with said West line to the South line of said Seetion 22, thence Easterly along said South line to the Westerly right-of- way line of Highway 169, thence Southerly and Westerly along said Westerly right-of-way line to a point 737.21' South of the said Southerly section line, thence West parallel with said Southerly section line 160', thence North 83° 11' 30" West 932.45', thence South 6° 78' 30" West 690' to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, thence Northwesterly to its intersection with a point on the South shore of Staring Lake approximately 500' West of the West line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, thence Easterly and Northerly along the shore of Staring Lake to the South line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, thence East along said South line to a point 270' West of the Southeast comer of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22, thence Northerly to centerline of Staring Lake Parkway, thence Easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Southerly extension of the West line of Outlot A Research Farm 3rd Addition, thence Northerly along said West line of Outlot A to the Southerly right-of-way line of Anderson Lakes Parkway, thence Northeasterly at right angles with the centerline to the West line of Outlot A Eden Place Apartments, thence Northerly and Westerly along said West line to the North line of Section 22, thence Westerly along said North iine to the West line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, thence North along said West line to the North right-of-way line of Chestnut Drive, thence Easterly along the Northerly right-of-way line to the West line of Outlot F Wind song Two Plat, thence Easterly, Nortterly and Westerly along said Westerly line !o the South line of Outlot E, thence Westerly alcng said South line to the West line of Southwest Quarter of Section 15, thence South along sa:d West line to the North line of the Parkway Apartments Plat, thence Westerly along said ~orth line to the Westerly right-of-way line of Anderson Likes Parkway, thence Northerly and Westerly along said Westerly right-of- way line to Mitchell Road, thence westerly along the southerly right-of-way line of Scenic Heights Road to the Southwest comer of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, thence North along West Line of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 to the North right-of-way line of State Highway 5, thence East along North right-of- way line of State Highway #5 to its intersection with a line bearing South 10° West from a point 1206.7' East along North line of Section 15 from the Northwest comer of said Section 15, thence Northeast on last described line to the North line of Section 15, Township 116, Range 22, thence East along said North line to the West line of Tract A, R.L.S. #1354, thence North along said West line to the Northwest comer of said Tract A, thence Northwesterly along I-A-2 Southwesterly line of Lot 1, Block 2,'Edenvale 4th Addition to the Southerly and Easterly right- of-way line of Mitchell Road, thence continuing along said Southwesterly boundary line extended to the Northwesterly right-of-way line of Mitchell Road, thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right-of-way line to its intersection with the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, thence North along said West line to its intersection , with the Northerly right-of-way line of Valley View Road, thence North and Easterly along said Northerly right-of-way line to a point, 14.5' West of the East line of the said Southeast Quarter measured at right angles to said East line, thence South parallel with said East line to a point 597.6' North of South line of Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence East at right angles 14.5' to East line of said Southeast Quarter, thence South 597.6' to the Southeast comer of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence East along said North line to its intersection with the East line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter Section 11, Township 116, Range 22, thence' North along said East line to its intersection with the Southwesterly right-of-way line of u.S. Highway #494, thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly right-of-way line to its intersection with the North line of said Section 11, thence East along said North line to its intersection with the Westerly shoreline of Bryant Lake, thence South and East along said shoreline to Point B; Point B is described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 11, thence W ~st along South line . of said Quarter 525', thence deflecting to the Right 71 0 to its intersection with the South shoreline of Bryant Lake, said intersection being called Point B; thence Svutheast.!rly from Point B to a point on the South line of the said Northeast Quarter, 525' We~t of the Southeast comer of said Northeast Quarter, thence East along said South line to the said Southeast comer, thence South along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116, Range 22, to the Southwest comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence East along the South line ,of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to its intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of u.S. Highway #169-212, thence Southerly along said right-of-way line to the Northerly right-of-way line of Valley View Road, thence Easterly and Northerly along said Northerly right-of-way line to its intersection with the Westerly right-of-way line of Washington Avenue, thence South along said Westerly right-of- way extended to its intersection with the Southerly right-of-way line of Valley View Road, thence Westerly and Southerly along the Southerly right-of-way line of said Valley View Road to its intersection with the \Vest line of the East 30 Acres of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, thence Southerly along said line 826.84', thence Westerly at right angles 522', thence Northerly at right angles to last described line to its intersection with the Southerly right-of-way line of Valley View Road, thence Southerly and Westerly along said Southerly right-of-way line to its intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of Schooner Boulevard, thence Southerly along said Easterly right-of-way line to the most Northwesterly comer of Outlot E, Golden Strip Plat, thence Southerly and Easterly along Northerly boundary line of said Outlot E to its intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway #494, thence Easterly along said Northerly right-of-way line to its intersection with a line which is parallel to the East line of Section 13, Township 116, Range 22, and 920.70' Westerly of said East line, thence North on last described line to its intersection with the North line of said Section 13, thence East on said North line to beginning. I-A-3 • • • SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14195 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 14196 MINNESOTA CLE SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 185.00 • 14197 MINNESOTA UC FUND 2ND QTR 93 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 3384.58 14198 HN DEPT OF REVENUE JULY 93 FUEL TAX 332.00 14199 EPHS MARCHING BAND ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-100.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14200 CHILDS PLAY THEATRE ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-840.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14201 EVERGREEN COMMUNITY CHURCH ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-200.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14202 RON MERCHANT ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-500.00 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14203 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 7.99 14204 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-COHHUNITY SERVICES DEPT/PARK 90.55 HAINT/ENGINEERING DEPT/SENIOR CTR/ ADAPTIVE RECREATION/COHMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/ WATER DEPT 14205 PETTY CASH-COHHUNITY CENTER EXPENSES-COHHUNITY CENTER 19.06 14206 PETTY CASH CHANGE FUND-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 50.88 14207 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 208.00 14208 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 156.03 14209 AT&T SERVICE 231.47 14210 AT&T SERVICE 621.22 14211 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 147.25 14212 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 30604.52 14213 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 546.59 14214 C BANN y REFUND-SPRINGBOARD DIVING LESSONS 5.70 14215 JOY BREKKE REFUND-GOLD FOILED SHIRTS CLASS 6.00 • 14216 WENDY CHRETIEN REFUND-SA!LING LESSONS 9.00 14217 JOAN ENGSTROM REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 ~ 14218 KATHI EVENSON REFUND-BEFORE & AFTER CARE CLASS 10.00 14219 FRASER COHHUNITY SERVICES REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RENTAL 101.18 14220 LAURIE GEBBIE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 40.00 14221 TIM HAMILTON REFUND-HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL 48.58 14222 ETHEL HOFFHINES REFUND-STATE FAIR TRIP 6.00 14223 CATHLEEN KING REFUND-SLEEPOVER FOR SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP 9.00 14224 PAT KNOBLAUCH REFUND-SUMMER SPORTS CAMP 46.40 14225 JOYCE LINDNER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 14226 ';OLENE WKANEN REFUND-TAGS EXERCISE CLASS 27.00 14227 TERESA LUND REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 13.00 14228 MARGARET MCARTHUR REFUND-PHOTO MANAGING CLASS 5.00 14229 MARITA MCVEIGH REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP & SLEEPOVER 64.00 14230 SUE MEYERS REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP 55.00 14231 BOB NEARY REFUND-SPRINGBOARD DIVING CLASS "5.70 14232 S NORD REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.24 14233 DEBBIE OLSON REFUND-A~JLT GOLF LESSONS 40.0C 14234 KRIS SCHAITBERGER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 23.0C 14235 SANDRA STI ER REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 13.0C 14236 LEN WOOD & ASSOCIATES BOOK-ADMINISTRATION DEff 36.4£ 14237 THE INNOVATION GROUPS PUBLICATION-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 7.9f. 14238 MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION TOUCH F~BALL STATE TEAM REGISTRATION 86.0C 14239 U S WEST OOHMUNICATIONS SEi\VICE 1217. H 14240 HENNEPIN COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT FOR 1993 CDBG WARRANT 25. 7~ 14241 HENNEPIN COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT-OVERPAYMENT CDBG WARR~T 28.2f • 14242 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT REFUND-PLAN DEPOSIT 25.0( 4023650 ~/"'\ " . '~ , \.,,_ .... .1 :") .,j -C/' SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14243 SCO'IT STRAMPE PAYMENT FOR TEMPORARY EASEMENT 250.00 14244 RESEARCH OFFICE 1992 SALARY SURVEY-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1° DE PI' 14245 THE WAVE F()()L TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS/FEES PAID 1 . 0 14246 DEM CON LANDFILL INC JULY 93 WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINTIPARK 115.50 MAINT 14247 . SCHMIDT READY MIX INC , CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE 396.94 14248 SPECIALTY CONTRACTiNG INC SERVICE-WATER MAIN LEAK REPAIR-8805 1272.00 BASSWOOD COURT 14249 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-FALL COMMUNITY BROCHURE 4291. 73 14250 UPS POSTAGE-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 12.92 14251 BALLOON BOW K~S BALLOONS-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION 84.98 14252 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS SERVICE-REMODEL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER 32555.23 14253 DALCO SHELFIPLATFORM TRUCKIRECEPTACLES-619.36 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION/PAPER TOWELS-WATER DEPT 14254 TIE SYSTEMS INC MN CITY CENTER PHONE SYSTEM DOWN PAYMENT 11521.00 14255 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 232.00 14256 HOPKINS POSTM~STER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 908.01 14257 HAPPY FACES ENTERTAINMENT CO FACEPAINTING-CITY EMPLOYEE PICNIC-HUMAN 67.50 RESOURCES DEPT 14258 GREG RUSH ENTERTAINMENT-CITY EMPLOYEE PICNI~-rIUMAN 100.00 RESOURCES DEPT 14259 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-SEPTEMBER & OCTOBER SENIOR 158.60 NEWSLE'ITER 1426C CONSUL RESTAURANT CORP REFUND-CASH DEPOSIT PROVIDED TO SATISFY 3875.00 WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC WATER MAIN 8.~ 14261 ALL AMERICAN BO'ITLING CORP MIX ~ 14262 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 14263 EAST S I DE BEVERAGE CO BEER 14446.15 14264 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 9600.32 14265 MIrn~ST COCA COLA BO'ITLING CO MIX 507.32 14266 PEPS I COLA COMPANY MIX 107.15 14267 POGREBA DISTRIBUTING INC BEER 267.35 14268 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 21327.40 14269 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 1981.33 14270 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO UNIFORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER/MATS-LIQUOR 165.81 STORES 14271 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE 99.76 14272 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 11.98 14273 JASON-NORTHCO L P #1 SEPTEMBER 93 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 5721.17 14274 WELSH COMPANIES SEPTEMBER 93 REN~-~ITY HALL 26596.2€ 14275 WELSH COMPANIES SEPI'EHBER 93 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 6396.14 14276 AMERICAN FO~ESTS CONFERENCE-FORES~Y DEPT 220.0C 14277 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 17680.0C 14278 RAMSEY FOUNDATION/CME CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT/BLDG iNSPECTIONS/ 21.0C POLICE DEPT 14279 HOLIDAY INN CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPI' 48.3E 14280 MARGARET ~NRO CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPI' 70.0C 14281 JOHN K TEMAN & JEAN M TEMAN INTEREST PAYMENT DUE FOR LAND PURCHASED 1875.0C 14282 MICHAEL RUDOLPH ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LY CONCERT SERIES-500.0C HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14283 PATRICK OLAUGHLIN ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-.O( HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 17346345 :;; 0 C'?U \"'~~ 'r· SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14284 DICK REES ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES-450.00 • HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14285 LOTUS BOOKS BOOKS-FINANCE DEPT 82.85 14286 FAEGRE & BENSON CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 30.00 14287 ASIAN GANG INVESTIGATORS ASSN CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 50.00 14288 ASSN FOR COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE-I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 395.00 ·14289 LINDA AUGER REFUND-SUHME~ ACTJVITY CAMP 55.00 14290 PATRICIA BAUMER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.25 14291 JENNA BOOTH REFUND-JUNIOR GOLF LESSONS 28.00 14292 LYNN CARLON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 40.00 14293 LEAH COX REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 40.00 14294 ELECTRO-SENSORS REFUND-STARING LK PARK BUILDING RENTAL 69.88 14295 SUSAN GATTO REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 40.00 14296 RANDY HARTSHORN REFUND-BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE TRIP 336.00 14297 JENNIFER HARVEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00 14298 REID HERREID REFUND-ACT!VITY CAMP 55.00 14299 KURT KNOFF REFUND-STARING LK PK BUILDING RENTAL 50.00 14300 KENDRA HCMI LLAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 23.00 14301 EILEEN MEREDITH REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RENTAL 49;55 :4302 JULIE MUSECH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 14303 STEVEN SALEMO REFUND-BEFORE & AFTER CARE FOR ACTIVITY 14.00 CAM2 14304 TERRY TALBERT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 33.00 14305 MARLENE VOLENEC REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 40.00 14306 VALERIE WALSH REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP 55.00 14307 ROMA WEBER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 14308 GALE WHITE REFUND-SUMMER ACTIVITY CAMP 165.00 • 14309 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REIMBURSEMENT OF LOAN-MILLER PROPERTY 101241.40 14310 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY TAXES-7835 EDEN COURT 1050.00 ~ 14311 FiRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 08-20-93 83579.13 14312 PRUDENTIAL CO OF AMERICA AUGUST 93 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 3403.34 14313 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO AUGUST 93 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM 1962.97 14314 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER CONFERENCE-FINANCE DEPT 290.00 14315 SIGNATURE BEEF & GRILL MEETING EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 76.36 14316 MINNESOTA SECTION AWWA CONFERENCE-WATER DEPT 280.00 14317 PETTY CASH-E P COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 30.00 14318 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC CO-OP SERVICE 63.10 14319 DONALD OLSON POSTAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 24.76 14320 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 08-20-93 450.00 14321 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 08-20-93 7457.00 14322 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 08-20-93 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 280.00 14323 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 08-20-93 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 225.69 14324 IQ1A RETIREMENT TRUS':'-157 PAYROLL 08-20-93 3576.46 14325 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 08-20-93 32.00 14326 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC SEPTEMBER 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 20091.70 14327 MEDICA CHOICE SEPTEMBER 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 46449.90 14328 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 08-20-93 298.00 14;)29 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 08-20-93 50.00 14330 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 08-20-93 25.00 14331 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA SEPTEMBER 93 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 237.00 14332 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 08-20-93 116.60 14333 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 08-20-93 37207.17 14334 UNITED WW PAYROLL 08-20-93 206.00 • 14335 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE 22170.11 14336 RIVERPORT INN CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPT 212.18 33325840 ?O (~O ~ \.- SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14337 FRANK POWELL DAMAGE REPAIR DUE TO SNOW PLOWING-STREET 17 MAINT 14338 APOLLO COMMUNICATIONS PARTIAL BILLING-COMMUNITY EDUCATION VOICE! 70_ . 0 DATA CABLING SYSTEM-E P CITY CENTER 14339 EAGLE WINE CO LIQUOR & WINE 959.83 14340 GRIGGS. COOPER & 00 INC LIQUOR 24262.64 14341 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 00 LIQUOR & WINE 33905.19 14342 PAUSTIS & SONS 00 WINE 219.80 14343 ED PHILLIPS & SONS 00 LIQUOR & WINE 18348.13 14344 PRIOR WINE 00 WINE 4650.27 14345 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR & WINE 18570.29 14346 SONJA ANDERSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 35.75 14347 MIKE AULIZIA SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 63.53 14348 MICHAEL BATILE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 89.38 14349 . REED BERGMANN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 19.80 14350 MATI BEYER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 87.73 14351 BRENDT BLY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 44.28 14352 KELSEY BUELL SERVIC~-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 63.80 14353 CHRISTOPHER BURKAUSKAS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 74.53 14354 DIANE FARMER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 169.20 :. 14355 JOEY FARMER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 70.68 14356 NICK FRANDLE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 35.40 14357 CHRIS GAGNER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 84.15 14358 JAMES GEKAS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 39.60 14359 KYLER GlIi10RE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 74.40 14360 RAY GRIFFITHS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 39.60 14361 BRIAN GRUIDL SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM ~O 14362 STEPHEN HELLER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM .2~ iS$lv 14363 LISA HENRY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM -.' .. ' 14364 KYLIE HOWK SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 37.50 14365 FORREST KELLEY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 30.53 14366 TIM KERBER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 45.38 14367 CHRIS KUHIi1AN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 32.45 14368 CHRIS KUIPERS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 45.00 14369 ALAN LAVENDER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 161.70 14370 JAYMI LEE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 61.05 14371 HEATHER MATISON SERVICE-TEEN WvRK PROGRAM 117.52 14372 CHUCK MOULDER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 36.0C 14373 JACK MOULDER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 44.0C 14374 CHARLIE NEITZEL SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 86.90 14375 STEPHEN RINGQUIST SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 39.8e 14376 MARIE ROGERS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 84.1C 14377 PHIL ROONEY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 67.9:: 14378 MATI SCHERER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 32.7C 14379 ZACH SCHNEIDER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 54.9C 14380 KRISTIN SCHWECKE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 23.1C 14381 JON SWANSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 30.5~ 14382 JOHN TAGGATZ SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 68.4£ 14383 KEVIN THOMAS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 64.9C 14384 JENNY THOMAS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 69.0( 14385 RYAN VOLKER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 83.7( 14386 ANDY WILSON SERVTCE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 41.1( 14387 PAUL WILLIAMS-WUSSOW SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM t~ 14388 AUTUMN WILLIAMS-WUSSOW SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 2' !.4389 NIOOLE WYMAN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM .7( 11075921 d ," U L, (j rw SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14390 ANDY WHITE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 50.33 • 14391 PETER WESTBERG SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 43.73 14392 CHAD WALLEBECK SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 93.90 14393 RYAN WAINWRIGHT SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM 90.90 14394 ABRA AUTO BODY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14395 JOHN ADAMS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14396 DREW ALLENSWORTH REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14397 ANTHONY ALTIERI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14398 GREG ANDERSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14399 JIM ANDERSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14400 LYNN E ANDERSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14401 ROBERT ANDERSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14402 TODD G ANDERSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14403 LINDA ARP REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14404 MARCEL BACH REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 50.00 14405 JOANNE BAER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14406 BARBARA BAGLIEN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 50.00 14407 BRUCE BAILEY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14408 SHARON BARLI REFUND-fOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14409 PATRICK BARNDS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14410 TOM BAPTL REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEF 100.00 14411 JCHN BEAUDETTE 'REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14412 KRIS BENGTSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14413 LARRY BENNB:R REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14414 RAi~DY BIERBAUM REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14415 DAN BINS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 200.00 14416 CURT BJORLIN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 • 14417 PETE BJORLIN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14418 KEVIN BLAKE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 ~ 14419 JIM BODICK REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITI FEE 100.00 14420 MARK BOOMGAARDEN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14421 BRET BORTH .REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14422 HARLAN D BOSSEN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14423 CHUCK BOURN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14424 MARY BOYCE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14425 OOUG BROWN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14426 SHERRY BRUNING REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14427 CHUCK BULSON . REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14428 KEN CARLSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14429 RI CK CARLSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILliY FEE 100.00 14430 THOMAS R CHRISTY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14431 GARY CLIFFORD REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14432 ENRIGUE M CRESPO REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE .~ 100.00 14433 JOHN CVETNIC REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14434 RANDY DALIl1AN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14435 BRIAN DANIELSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.0C 14436 EARL DAUGHERTY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0C 14437 BECKY DEAN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIG~BILITY FEE 100.0( 14438 MATI DETERDING REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0C 14439 DOMINIC DEVAAN REFU~D-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0( 14440 BRAD DICKMANN 'REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0C 14441 BRIAN OOTEN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75. (I( 14442 LARRY OOVER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0( • 14443 BILL DRURY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.0( 14444 BRENT DUPONT REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100. Of 5:0386 .......... ""-. " r-, \ ~ .... ,.,I . :;:;:--./ ~-. SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14445 BOB EARLY 14446 STEVE ELFSTROM 14447 BRAD ERRE'IT 14448 LAWRENCE J FOOTE 14449 STEFANI FOSS 14450 PAUL FLORIN 14451 ROB. FRANCIS 14452 SCOTT FRANSEN 14453 DAVID FREER 14454 HAARIE GAYTHER 14455 G E CAPITAL 14456 G E CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES 14457 TOM GESELLE 14458 ART GLICK 14459 KATHY GRAHBSCH 14460 DAN GROEN 14461 LANCE GROENEVELD 14462 JASON GRUND :4463 THOMAS R GUNDERSON 14464 JOHN HAANSTAD 14465 KEN HALLONQUIST 11466 JIM HAMLIN 14467 TONY HANSON 14468 SCOTT C HARRINGTON 14469 RICHARD E HATCHER 14470 DAVID HIBBISON 14471 WILLIAM HOAG 14472 PAUL HOFFER 14473 HARK H HOGUE 14474 GARY HOLUM 14475 PAUL HOWArtD 14476 DON HUNTER 14477 SCOTT HUTCHINS 14478 BOB JACKSON 14479 JIM JACKSON 14480 JERRY M JENSEN 14481 KEVIN JOHNSON 14482 HARK JOHNSON 14483 SCOTT JOHNSON 14484 TODD R JOHNSON 14485 RANDY KELLOGG 14486 TODD KIMHES 14487 THOMAS KNAUER 14488 SANDRA KOESTER 14489 GREG KORTUEM 14490 TIM KOST 14491 TONY KRICK 14492 LADONNfi KRUMHOLZ 14493 HEATHER KUTCHES 14494 HATT LAMMERS 14495 LYLE LANG 14496 DAVID D LARSON 14497 RANDY LARSON 14498 DAVE LEKANDER 14499 MIKE LIEN 505000 REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE -REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE hEFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUt:D-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE '\'" .~ '.*f'~'''''' \ 100.00 ~O ro~ 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 25.00 100.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 I ~~ .00 100.00 100.00 100.0C 100.0C -lOO.OC 75.0C 100.OC 75.0C 100.0C 100.OC 100.0C 100.0C 75.0C 100.0C 100.0C 100.0C 100.OC 100.0C 100.0C 75.0( 100.0( 100.0( 100.01 eg, SEPTEMBER 7.1993 • 14500 DANA LINCOLN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14501 LEE LOEHRS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14502 WILLIAM M LORNTSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14503 BRIAN LOUHI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14504 DAVE LYONS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14505 JAY MARTIN, REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14506 BREIT MCMAHON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14507 CATHY MEYER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14508 BOB MEYERS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14509 DAVID R MILANO REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14510 DAVID R MILANO REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14511 ELSIE IRENE MILLER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14512 MIKE MILLER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14513 FINLEY MONTGOMERY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14514 BETH MUNDY REFUND-SOFTBALL iLIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14515 DAN I EL T MURPHY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14516 MARK MYERS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14517 .JOHN NAGEL REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14518 JOHN M NASH REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14519 ROB NESSA REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14520 JENNIr'ER NEtJMANN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FIE 75.00 14521 AL NIEDERHAUS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14522 GARY NIKOLAI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14523 DEB NOLL REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14524 RANDY OBRIEN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14525 JEFF ODELL REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 ~. 14526 PAT OLSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14527 STEVE OLSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 175.00 14528 GREG OTIO REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 50.00 14529 TOM OWENS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14530 DOUG PAGITI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14531 PAX CHRISTI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14532 JODI A PETERS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14533 CINDY PETERSON REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14534 BETH PHILLIPPE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14535 MIKE POWER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14536 DAVID REACH REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14537 MICHAEL RIGGLE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14538 JAMES E RILEY REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14539 JAY RODBERG REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14540 KEVIN ROQUETIE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 145~1 TOM ROSKE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14542 RANDY RYSKI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14543 DARRYL SANFORD REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14544 MIKE SAUER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14545 JIM SCOTI REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEr 100.0C 1.4546 DAN SEELER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.00 14547 REID C SELLGREN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 50.00 14548 ANN SENN REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14549 PATRICK SIEBENALER REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.00 14550 RO~IN SMITH REFUND-SO~LL ELIGIBILITY FEE 75.0C 14551 PHILLIP SOLTVEDT REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.OC • 14552 RICHARD SPEAR RE~)ND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.0C 14553 JEFF STEFANOV REFUND-SOFTBALL EL1G1B1L11\: FEE lOO.OC 14554 ELI SA STRAKA REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE 100.OC 515000 " " \ _'0 '.:·o~~ :.,~. SEPTEMBER 7.1993 14555 14556 14557 14558 14559 14560 14061 14562 14563 14564 14565 14566 14567 14568 14569 14570 14571 14572 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 14581 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 LAREE STREHPKE STEVEN J STROMSNESS JIM STRONER BRIAN SUIl1AN TOt1 SUTERA RODGER SWANSON CURT TAHBORNINO JOHN G TANNER DAVE TERRY TERRY L THELEHANN DALE THOt1AS CRAIG D THOMPSON MIKE TIEDEN LIZ TRACY TOt1 TRECKER DEAN D TROM JULIE TWEDT DUANE ULRICH HARK VANDENBUSSCHE GREG VANDERVORSTE RICHARD WALLNER GREG WALSH JIM WALZ REED WARD BRUCE D WEBSTER DARYL WEISPFENNING RICH WESTERBERG JUSTIN WHILEY SUE WILKINSON BOB WINTERS SHERRY WINTERS MIKE WYA'IT MIKE YAGER ERIC YOUNG CRAIG ZEMKE ABBOTT OFFICE SYST~MS ABBOTT PAINT & CARPET CO ASH EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC ADVANCED CHIMNEY TECHNOLOGY 14594 ADVERTISING INCENTIVES 14595 AIRSIGNAL INC 14596 RAY ALLEN MFG CO INC 14597 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO 14598 AMERICAN EXCEuSIOR CO 14599 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSN 14600 AMERICAN RED CROSS REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUN~·SOFTBALL E~IGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE REFUND-SOFTBALL ELIGIBILITY FEE TV MOUNTING SYSTEH/VCR BRACKET-WATER DEPT PAINT ROLLERS-WATER DEPT DOOh SHOCKIBATJL PIN-PARK MAINTENANCE CHIMNEY CLEANING/FURNACE & CHIMNEY CAPS & SCREEN-CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM SWEATSHIRTS/SHIRTS/EHBROIDERY-LIQUOR STORES PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/STREET MAINT COHPETITOR BITE SLEEVE-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT SWEEPER RENTAL-STREET MAINTENANCE :ROSION CONTROL MATS/STtlPLES/POWER STOPS- PARK MAINTENANCE DUES-FINANCE DEPT TEXTBOOKSIHANUALSIRESUE MANIKIN RENTAL- POOL LESSONS/POOL OPERATION 14601 14602 14603 14604 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARC DUES-PARK PLANNING DEPT AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN DUES-WATER DEPT AMEX TIRE CO USED TIRES REMOVAL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC BUCKLE CARBON/STAINLESS STEEL BANDINGI BRACKETS/SIGNS-STREET DEPT/PARK MAINT/ 2003386 100.00 l~g 1.0 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 ~~g .0 100.00 10V.OO 100.00 100.00 200.00 238.17 190.68 75.42 139.25 2986.90 1397.76 172.56 4-i27.50 226.53 175.00 374.18 253.00 3502.00 Wo 1 1 HYDRANT SYMBOLS-WATER DEPT 14605 ANDERSONS GARDEN SPRUCE TREE-STREET MAINTENANCE 25.55 14606 ANDROC PRODUCTS INC • WEED KILLING COMPOUND-PARK MAINTENANCE 221. 70 • 14607 ANIMAL & BOARDING KENNEL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 27.69 14608 AQUA ENGINEERING INC VALVE TOPS/SOLENOIDSIWIRE CONNECTORS-3764.38 POLICE BLDG/LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLATION-$3631-TO BE REIMBURSED BY E P GARDEN CLUB 14609 PAT ARENIJI' PHOTO MGMT INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAlD , 10.00 14610 ARMOR SECURITY INC LOCK REPAIRIREKEYED MASTER CYLINDER-FIRE 104.00 STATIONIEATON BLDG 14611 B & STOOLS DIAGONAL CUTTERSIPRY BARIWRENCHES/PLIERS/ 416.10 SCREWDRIVERSIHAMMER-UTILITIES DIVISION 14612 CHANNING L BETE CO INC PUBLICATIONS-PET PROTECTION PROGRAM-389.00 ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 14613 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER PLAN UPDATE 4416.01 14614 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSALrPARK MAINTENANCE 267.30 14615 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LK PK/ 1780.84 COMMUNITY CENTER 14616 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON JULY 93 KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 563.00 14617 BOlSON CONSTRUCTION REFUND-BUILDING PERM1T DEPOSIT 100.00 14618 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LK EACH 85.05 CO~lCE:;SIONS 146.L.9 LEE BRANDT SOFTBALL OFFiCIAL/FEES PAID 284.00 14620 BRYAN J BRA V ARD SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 33.00 14621 BRO-TEX INC TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 162.30 14622 BROAOOAY AWARDS TROPHIES/PLAQUES/ENGRAVING-ORGANIZED 154.16 ATHLE~ICS PROGRAM 14623 MAXINE BRUECK MILEAGE/EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 156.06 ~. 14624 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINT~NANCE 279.82 14625 BSN SPORTS VOLLEYBALL NETS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS DEPT 319.00 14626 NATHAN BUCK SOFTBALL/FOOTBALL & VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/ 1130.25 FEES PAID 14627 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 180.00 14628 WES BYRON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 33.00 14629 CALCTYPE OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIP2 DEPT 315.00 14630 CAMPBELL ENTERPRISES FETCH POLE-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 94.63 14631 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-4142.84 POLICE DEPTIREMOVAL OF SURPLUS VHF EQUIPMENT FROM FIRE VEHICLES/CRIMPEPS/ TEFLON CABLE WITH CRIMPERS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 14632 CAPITOL SALES CO INC VHS TAPES-FIRE DEPT 53.77 14633 CBI NA-CON REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT DEPOSIT 200.00 14634 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC 5 COMPUTERS & MONITORS/CABLES/SOFTW~~E-10470.66 FINANCE DEPT 14635 CENTRAIRE INC INSTALLED DRYER VENTING-FIRE STATION/ 1926.18 CHANGED COMPRESSOR AIR FILTERS/PRESSL~E WASHED COOLING TOWER & CONDENSING UNIT/ CLEANED DRAIN SUMP/COOLING TOWER CH~ICAL TREATMENT-POLICE BLDG/PUBLIC WORK3 E~/ FAMILTY CENTER/INSTALLED EXHAUST FAN BIRD SCREEN COVER-FIRF STATION 14636 CHILDS PLAY THEATRE CO ARTS CAMP DI]ECTOR/FEES PAID 2000.00 14637 CLASSIC POOLS PLUS INC CHEMICALS-COHMUNITY CTR POOL MAINTENANCE 273.14 • 3437843 SE?I'EMEER 7. 1993 14638 JAMES CLARK AUGUST 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 200.00 14639 CLEAN SWEEP INC MAIN BROOMS/SIDE BRUSHES-PARK MAINT/ 1218.52 PARKING LOT STRIPING-COMMUNITY CENTER .6 14640 CO2 SERVICES CARBON DIOXIDE & CYLINDER RENTAL-POOL MAINTENANCE 14641 A COMMERCIAL CLEANING CO INC CARPET CLEANING SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE 170.40 14642 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT CO COMPRESSOR PANEL LEAKS REPAIRED-FIRE DEPT 47.00 14643 CONNEY 'SAFETYPRODUCTS REPLACEMENT LENSES/EYEGLASS STRAPS/EAR 870.15 PLUGSIDUST MASKS/~~EAR CLEANERIBACK , SUPPORT-UTILITIES DIVISION/SAFETY DEPT 14644 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC RAIN JACKET-SEWER DEPT 40.16 14645 BARBARA COOK EXPENSESIMILEAGE-ASSESSING DEPT 32.37 14646 COPIES NOW COLOR MAPS-MARKETCENTER SITE 146.97 14647 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 67.95 14648 JEFFREY CORDES MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 243.75 14649 CLIFF CRACAUER MILEAGE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 119.50 14650 CRYSTEEL DIST INC DUMP MASTER BODY/SPECIAL HYDRAULICSIBOX 16960.34 WINDOWIUNDERCOATINGITANK/SIDE HANDLES/ LADDER-STREET DEPT 14651 CULLIGAN -METRO AUGUST & SEPTEMBER SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 33.40 14652 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC SILICONE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 76.55 14653 CURmIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC ELECTRODE HOLDER/LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 301.49 14654 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WLTER DEPT 8526.62 14655 DALeO CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/FLOOR 3273.23 SCRUBBER-$2982-COMHUNITY CENTER 14656 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO CONCRETE ABRASION BLADE/DIP ABRASIVE SAW 149.10 BLADE-SEWER DEPT 14657 CRAIG W DAWSON EXPENSESIMILEAGE-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 33.00 14658 DECORATIVE DESIGNS SEPTEMBER SERVICE-CITY HALL ~ 14659 DOMINIC DEVAAN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 2 .og ~ 14660 EUGENE DIETZ JULY CAR ALLOWANCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 14661 DONS SOD SERVICE SOC-ROUND LAKE PARK 2727.00 14662 DPC INDUSTRIES INC FERRIC SULFATE/SODIUM POLYPHOSPHATE-WATER 6838.52 DEPT 14663 WES DUNSMORE EXPENSES FOR TREE TRUST CREW-PARK & 124.78 RECREATION DEPT 14664 DYNA SYSTEMS HOSE CLAMPS/CONDUCTIVE PEN/CHISELSINUTS & 436.26 BOLTS-WATER DEPT 14665 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSES-CITY COUNCILi 32.00 ADMINISTRATION DEPT 14666 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT RINGS/SHAFTSIBEARINGS/CLUTCHESIDRAIN 244.56 PLUGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14~1)7 E P PHOTO FILM/FILM PROCESSING-FIRE DEPT 59.21 14668 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 BUS SERVICE-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS/RooM 605.13 RENTAL-PERFORMING ARTS PROGRAM 14669 EDEN PRAIRIE TIRE & AUTO SVC WHEEL ALIGNMENTS-EQUIPMEN7 MAINT/WATER 104.85 DEPT 14670 CITY OF EDINA JULY WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 270.0C 14671 EDINA S W PLUMBING WASHER & DRYER HOOK-UP & PARTS-FIRE DEPT 1317.7E 14672 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 125.0C 14673 EDUCATIONAL SPORTS PROGRAM INC YOUTH SOCCER CAMP DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 3164.0C 14674 EKLUNDS TREE & BRUSH DISPOSAL JULY 93 BRUSH DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1155.0C 14675 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT RINGS-SEWER r~PT 377.3E 14676 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC EAR PLUGS-PARK MAINTINITROGEN & CARBON 202.61 MONOXIDE DETEcriION TUBES-COMMUNITY CENTER • 4976410 3!PTEMBER 7.1993 14677 CHRIS ENGER • AUGUST 93 CfI.R ALLOWANCE-COMMUNITY 200.00 • DEVELOPMENT DEPT 14678 ENVIRO-CON HAY BALES-SEWER DEPT 20.00 14679 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSALrPARK MAINTENANCE 503.22 14680 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC WATER VALVE ADJUSTMENT RINGS-SEWER DEPT 468.60 14681 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 29.28 14682. FAIRVIEW BLOOD TESTS7POLICE DEPT 69.11 14683 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC FILTERS-WATER DEPT . 284.98 14684 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES TENNIS NETS/ALUMINUM TIES/STRAPS-PARK 630.00 MAINTENANCE 14685 FIRESIDE CORNER REFUND-OVERPAYMENT MECHANICAL PERMIT 30.00 14686 FLAGHOUSE INC DUFFLE BAGS/FLYING SAUCERS-PRESCHOOL 66.99 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 14687 FLOYD SECURITY 4TH QTR SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 23.03 AGREEMENT-CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEADIPASS CARD-LIQUOR S~ORE 14688 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 182.75 14689 FOUR SEASONS BUILDERS SERVICE-REMOVED ROOF & INSTALLED CEDAR 3040.00 SHINGLES/ALUMINUM GUTTERS & DOWN SPOUTS- HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM ::"4690 JOHN FRANE AUGUST 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-FINANCE DEPT 200.00 14691 FREEWAY DODGE REPLAC2D TRANSMISSION MOUNT-EQUIPMENT MAINT 140.70 14692 LYNDELL FREY EXPENSES-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 25.00 14693 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE WOOD PIKE POLE HANDLES-FIRE DEPT 221.35 14694 FULFILL PLUS COMPUTER DISC MASTERS-FINANCE DEPT 39.08 14695 G T LAWN SERVICE JULY LAWN MOWING SERVICE-PARK MAINT/ 1165.00 PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY • 14696 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG CO IN RINK DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 1331.54 14697 KATE GARWOOD EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 42.54 ~~ 14698 GATEWAY 2000 COMPUTER/MONITOR-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT 2650.00 14699 TEE GLIDDEN COMPANY PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 77 .32 14700 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SVC TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1831.59 14701 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC JULY 93 SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 168.75 14702 W W GRAINGER INC PUSH & PULL PLATES-POLICE BLDG 41.26 14703 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE 26.67 14704 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 75.10 14705 MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES REFUND-HOUSE MOVING DEPOSIT 1000.00 14706 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-MILLER PARK 6984.25 14707 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGEIEXPENSES-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 89.92 COMMISSIONIRECREATION ADMINISTRATION 14708 HEDBERG AGGREGATES TRAP ROCK-FACILITIES DEPT 188.81 14709 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF JULY 93 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 380.98 14710 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR~R FILING FEE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.DEPT 295.00 14711 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER REPAYMENT OF HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN 2540.67 FROM THOMAS MCGOVERN :4712 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS JULY FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPTIHOUSING 258.50 REHABILITATION PROGRAM :471:3 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 200.00 :4714 D C HEY COMPANY INC COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-BUILDING 26.00 INSPECTIONS DEPT 14715 HIRSCHFIELDS PAINT MFG FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 591.08 : 14716 TODD HOLZEMER SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER-CDBG FUNDS 112.50 :4717 HONEYWELL INC AUGUST 93 INDUSTRIAL MNTC AGREEMENT-WATER 1200.00 • DEPT :4718 HONEYWELL INC MOTOR-WATER DEPT 338.71 2785028 d /~)., . i [',r)" .. _", ...... ",,~ ......... J ~ 3EPTEHBER 7.1993 14719 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES . SECURITY SYSTEM MNTC AGREEMENTS-SENIOR 571.75 CENTER/LIQUOR STORE .: 14720 HUTTON CHEMICAL TRUCH WASH DETERGENT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14721 INLAND TRUCK PARTS CO U-JOINT KITSITUBINGIYOKES-EQUIPMENT MAINT 14722 INSTY-PRINTS BUSINESS & BIRTHDAY CARDS-POLICE DEPT 232.59 14723 INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTION CTR TONER-RECREATION ADHINISTRAlTON 303.97 14724 BRUCE ISAACS SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 33.00 14725 BRENDA JERDE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 240.00 14726 CHRIS JESSEN SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 82.50 14727 JET-BLACK SEALOOATING & REPAIR DRIVEWAY REPAIR-WATER DEPT 137.00 14728 JOHNSON/ANDERSON INC ENVELOPES-CITY HALL 72.86 14729 JUSTUS LUMBER CO PAINT REMOVERIPAINT BRUSHES/STEEL PADS & 199.22 WOOL-HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION PROGRAM 14730 KAYE CORPORATION SPOOL OF WEED TRIMMER STRING-PARK MAINT 25.55 14731 KNOWLEDGE CIRCLE INC SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 135.00 14732 JILL KIJYAVA VCLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 96.00 14733 L 0 F T CLASSICS T-SHIRTS/POLO SHIRTSITANK TOPS-AFTERNOON 4105.70 PLAYGROUND PROGRAMIYOUTH ATHLETICS/ ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM 2.4734 ~~ SAFETY SUPPLY SAFETY GLASS DISPENSER/PUBLICATIONS-117.84 UTILITIES DIVISION/SAFETY DEPT 1473S LAKE COUNTRY DOOR GARAGE DOOR INSTALLAT:ON-FACILITIES DEPT 1792.77 14736 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1806.67 14737 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC ELEMENTS/FRONT END ALIGNMENTSITURN SIGNAL G06.09 REPAIRITEMERATURE GAUGE BRACKET REPLACED/ ODOMETER REPAIR/SPEEDOMETERIHOOD ROD REPAIR-WATER DEPTIEQUIPMENT MAINT 2.4738 LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS CENTER SOD/GRASS SEED-STREET MAINTENANCE _2 14739 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD JUNE & JULY PROSECUTION SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 15 9 X»< 14740 ROBERT LANZI MILEAGE-ATHLETICS SUPERVISOR 2 .39 "-,' 14741 FRANK LAVALLE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 99.00 14742 L M CIT 2ND QTR WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUM 56491.50 14743 LEES LAWN CARE SERVICE-MOWING CENTER MEDIANS-STREET MAINT 532.50 14744 LIONS TAP GIFT CERTIFICATES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 115.00 PROGRAM 14745 LITURGICAL PUBLICATIONS INC ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 252.00 14746 LUNDS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 34.58 14747 MAACO AUTO PAINTING & BODYWORKS C REPAIR & REFINISH 2 VEHICLhS-EQUIPME~T 1043.08 MAINTENANCE 14748 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC SOCKET BOLTSIDIRT SHOE RUNNERS/GUTTER 1024.71 BROOMS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14749 GEORGE MARSHALL SERVICE-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY 50.00 14750 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 16.03 14751 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-CITY HALLIPOLICE DEPTIPRESCHOOL 79.58 PLAYGROUND/SENIOR CENTER 14752 MCGLYNN BAKER I ES INC EXPENSES-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND/POOL LESSONS 20.24 14753 MEDICINE LAKE LINES BU3 SERVICE-ADULT PROGR\MS 160.00 14754 MENARDS LOCKING STRAPS/STUDS/KEY BLANKS/PADLOCK/ 1530.77 GREEN TREATED LUMBER/GARBAGE CANS/FELT/ FERTILIZER/ADHESIVEITEFLON TAPE/PVC ELBOW/ WATERPROOFING/COUPLING-WATER DEPT/POLICE DEFT/FIRE DEPT/STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/ COMMUNITY CENTER 14755 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM JULY 93 SAC CHARGES 83.0 14756 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM SEPTEMBER 93 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 149 0 32130872 ',.'.~;'" ~. ), . .: oJ;) L- S~PTEMBER 7.1993 14757 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP ASPHALTIMILLING ON VALLEY VIEW RD-STREET 11678.02 • MAINTIROUND LK PK/PARK MAINT 14758 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALLIPOLICE DEPT 499.49 14759 MILWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 666.95 14760 MILWEST MACHINERY INC STARTERIWHEEL TYPE LOADER/SHACKLES/HOOKS/ 86778.28 LUBRICANT SYSTEMIMETAL PLATE-EQUIPMENT MAINT/STREET DEPT 14761 MINNCOMM PAGING AUGUST 93 PAGER SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 44.46 14762 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 20.00 14763 MINNEAPOLIS SPRING & BODY LOAD LEVELOR AIR KIT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1059.83 14764 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 683.50 14765 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY FIRE EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING/BOOTS/PUMP 1305.56 CAN/SWITCH ASSEMBLY/ADAPTERS/AXE BLADE/ HOLDERS/PIKE POLE BRACKETS/CROWBAR HOLDER/ STORAGE CABINET-FIRE DEPT/wATER DEPT 14766 MN DEPT OF FINANCE DEPOSIT FOR PARTICIPATION IN MHFA MN 10989.90 CITIES PARTICIPATION PROGRAM 14767 MN DEPT OF FINANCE PROCESSING FEE FOR PARTICIPATION IN MHFA 200.00 HCUSING PROGrAM 14768 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER JULY 93 BUILDING SURCHARGES 7614.31 14769 MINNESOTA WANNER CO SPRAY PISTOL WITH FILTER-SEWER DE~ 19.23 14770 MINT CONDITION DETAILING REMOVAL OF TI\CK OIL FROM VEHICLES-STREET 196.50 MAINTENANCE 14771 MINUTEMAN PRESS LABELS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 392.47 14772 tiTI DISTRIBUTING CO TAR SPRINGIBFAKE CABLE/KNOBILATCH-145.54 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14773 RICHARD L MUELLER PHD COMPUTER SOFTWARE SERVICE-FIRE DEPT 81.00 ~. 14774 wt1 MUELLER & SONS INC BLACKTOP/SAND-STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT 109772.84 14775 MUNICILITE CO POWER SUPPLY/STROBE HEAD-EQUIPMENT MAINT 299.65 14776 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN DUES-FIRE DEPT 285.00 ........ ~ 14777 JAN NELSON MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 100.00 14778 NEMER FIEGER & ASSOC INC ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 677.00 14779 WILLIAM T NEWELL SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 602.25 14780 BETH NILSSON SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 1017.28 14781 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS INC RUBBER GRIPINOZZLE-SEWER DEPT 41.51 14782 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO CITYS SHARE OF FALL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 294.03 PROGRAM 14783 SCOTT OMMEN MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 158.00 14784 ORKIN EXTERMINATING co INC AUGUST 93 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-FIRE STATIO 95.85 14785 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY LUMBAR SUPPORT INSTALLED-POLICE DEPT/ 174.00 CARPET PAD-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14786 PAP~RDIRECT INC CERTIFICATE RIBBONIEMBOSSED SEALS-SPORTS 177.30 CAMP/ACTIVITY CAMPITEEN WORK PROGRAM 14787 PCWORLD SUBSCRIPTION-LIQUOR STORE 19.97 14788 J C PENNEY UNIFORM PANTS-POLICE DEPT 61.49 14789 PEPSI COLA COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-SKATING RINKS 338.90 14790 STACY PETERSON PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 227.50 14791 PITNEY BOWES INC POSTAGE METER & MOISTENER MNTC AGREEMENT-229.00 POLICE DEPT 100.00 I 14792 PRAIRIE ADULT CARE SERVICE-SENIOR AWARE WEEK 14793 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC INSTALLED FUSES/vOLT CAPACITOR-WATER DEPTi 505.50 , REPLACED TRANSFORMER-POLICE BLDG ! 14794 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN BELTIWEED TRIMMER LINE & REPAIRIPULLEY/ 310.95 • PIPEIMOWERS REPAIREDIWHEELSIBLADE-WATER DEPT/STREET MAINTIPARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/FACILITIES DEPT 23786306 dO CtJO VV\. ::'4795 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING-REPORT FORMS-POLICE DEPT/ ,986.14 PROGRAMS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 14796 PRESERVE REXALL DRUG EXPENSES-LIQUOR STORE 3.08 14797 JERRY PROOOEHL MEETING EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE 26.~ 14798 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER SERVICES REPLACED SERIAL & VGA CARD/COMPUTER PARTS/ RELOADED SOFTWARE/GRAPHICS PRINTER CARD- POLICE DEPT 14799 THE PROMOTION GROUP WRISTBANDS-SPORTS CAMP 201.46 14800 PROTooL STEP LADDER-POLICE DEPT 39.85 14801 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL SERVI'CE-FAC1LI'I'IES DEPT/ 1553.52 COMMUNITY CENTER/LIQUOR STOREIWATER DEPT 14802 LEE RAY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 495.00 14803 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC SERVICE-CSAH #4 BRIDGE ABUTMENTS 60.70 14804 STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS LINE DANCE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 240.00 14805 S&S ARTS & CRAFTS GLUE-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 38.57 14806 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION CARBURETOR CLEANERITOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTI 252.67 PARK MAINTENANCE 14807 SAGAMORE PUBLISHING INC PUBLICATIONS-RECREATION ADHINISTRATION 47.56 14808 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 220.97 14809 PHIL SCHARMANN CARPET CLEANING SERVICE-LIQUOR STORE 160.00 14810 •• T ACK SCHAUBERT SERVICE-SEWER LINE CLEANED-SEWER DEPT 45.00 14811 COLIN D SCHMIDT EXPENSES/MILEAGE-ASSESSING DEPT 99.68 14812 KEVIN SCHMIEG JUTX CAR ALLOWANCE-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT 200.00 :'4813 SCHWANS SAL1<;S CONCESSIOl~ STAND SUPPLIES-TEEJ WORK PROGRAM 283.50 14814 OON SCHWARTZ SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 577.50 14815 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS JIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 68.98 14816 SEARS VACUUM FILTERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 34.06 14817 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC POrD SHIRTS-POLICE DEPT 37.90 14818 W E NEAL SLATE CO BULLETIN BOARD-STREET MAINTENANCE 146.97 14819 SMEAL FIRE EQUIPMENT CO INC FLASHLIGHTS/GLOVES-FIRE DEPT 61 1 14820 KARY SMITH SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 1 0 ~ 14821 PETER N SMITH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 5 . 0 ~.~ 14822 TIMOTHY SMITH REFUND-PARK DEDICATION FEE 840.00 14823 SNAP ON TOOLS CORPORATION HAMMER/CHUCK-WATER DEPT 59.37 14824 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC TYLENOL/SHOE POLISHIBUG SPRAY-POLICE DEPT 52.14 14825 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC TYLENOL/GLUE STICKS/DYE/MASKING TAPE/ 154.22 PITCHER/FILM/FILM PROCESSING-POLICE DEPT/ COMMUNITY CENTER 14826 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CUT OFF BLADES FOR ASPHALT-PARK MAINT 71.89 14827 SOUTHWEPT SUBURBAN CABLE COHMISSI REFUND-DUPLICATE PAYMENT ON CABLE 23.95 COMMISSION EXPENSES 14828 SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT CO WASH BAY REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN:E 187.35 14829 MARY F SPILLES VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 320.00 14830 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/CITY HALL/FIRE 558.60 DEPT 14831 STAHL CONSTRUCTION CO SERVCIE-REMODELING E P CITY CENTER 30713.00 14832 BOY SCOUT TROOP 347 REFRESHMENTS-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM 91.50 14833 DAN STENSON SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 635.25 1·:834 STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION INC 2ND QTR 93 YOUTH COUNSELING & REFERRAL 2758.25 SERVICES-COMMUNITY SVCS DEPT 14835 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ DASHLIGHTS/SIREN SWITCH SYSTEM-SEWER DEPT! 480.42 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 14836 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC SERVICE-E P HIGH SCHOOL CIRCULATION STUDY 2905.70 14837 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHOR I Tl' 2ND HALF ASSESSMENT-CITY COUNCIL 1500.00 5113007 • • ~. • SE~EMBER 7.1993 14838 NATALIE SWAGGERT 14839 SWEDLUNDS 14840 SYSTEMS CONTROL SERVICES INC 14841 TEAM MINNESOTA HOCKEY INC 14842 TELLUS CONSULTANTS INC 14843 TENNANT COMPANY 14844 OOUG THIES 14845 TOLL COMPANY 14846 REBECCA TRIMBLE 14847 TWIN CITY VACUUM 14848 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 14849 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 14850 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 14851 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 14852 USAQUATI SS 14853 VlCOM INC 14854 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS 14855 VISION ENERGY 14856 VOLUNTEER FIREMANS BENEFIT ASSN 14857 DAVE WAGNER 14858 PAT WALKER 14859 WATERPRO 14860 WBCS 14861 TODD G WEISE 14862 DIRK WELLS 14863 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 14864 JOEL WESTACOTT 14865 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC 14866 LOIS WILDER 14867 WRIGHT LINE INC 14868 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 14869 ZIEGLER INC 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 11000 NORWEST BANK 2::000 tiN DEPT OF REVENUE 22000 tiN DEPT OF REVENUE 22000 tiN DEPT OF REVENUE 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 26277186 • AUGUST CAR ALLOWANCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT JULY WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER REMOVED & REPLACED ARC CONTACT/RADIO REPAIR-WATER DEPT CONCESSIONS STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTE SERVICE-CITY WIDE HISTORIC & ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY SHAKER TIMER/FILTER/SIDE DOOR SKIRTS- PARK MAINTENANCE SPEAKER WIRE-FIRE DEPT HELIUM-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM DEPOSIT FOR MATERIALS-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM SAFETY SWITCH-FIRE STATION UNIFORM-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT UNIFORMS/GUN HOLSTER-POLICE DEPT SLIDE RENTAL-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS WORK GLOVES/CONNECTORSIBATTERY CLAMPS/ TERMINALSINUTS & BOLTSIPIPE COUPLINGS/ FITTINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VINYL COVERED STAINLESS STEEL CABLE- WMMUNITY CENTER ~ WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CTR BARRIER TAPE-PARK MAINTENANCE PROPANE CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER DUES-FIRE DEPT REMOVAL OF TACK OIL FROM VEHICLE-STREET MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID CHEMICALS-PARK MAINT/PVC PIPE GASKETS/ SPEErsRETE/SILT FENCE/STORM SEWER INSTALLATION/5/8X3/4 100 GAL METERS/ COPPERHORNSIVALVE SEATIHYDRANT HOSE GATE VALVEIRISERSIHETER SEALSIREMOTE READERS- WATER DEPT TYPESETTING FLYERS & BROCHURES-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION/FALL COMMUNITY BROCHURE/ SENIOR NEWSLETTERIHISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION SOFTBAL~ OFFICIAL/FEES PAID SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 2ND QUARTER SERVICE-COMMUNITY SVCS DEPT SERVICE-SOUND TECHNICIAN-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION RELIEF VALVE/DISC-COMMUNITY CENTER MEMOIR WRITING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID LABELS/FOLDERS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DE~f 1ST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/STREET MAINT GASKETIRINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BOND PAYMENTS BOND PAYMENTS PAYROLL 07-23-93 PAYROLL 08-06-93 PAYROLL 08-20-93 PAYROLL 08-06-93 ~ 'U,-, , ,( '; ,' .. " { 0· .... • :..;.;- 200.00 320.00 306.64 592.70 12000.00 210.d2 17.03 15.98 760.00 27.22 73.00 288.09 8.52 693.60 399.92 8.75 14.80 476.02 316.00 151. 73 239.25 6288.48 944.00 198.00 66.00 437.50 750.00 33.80 112.50 93.42 135.37 36.57 175425.00 2413.38 17543.39 17854.47 16757.71 6563.00 o SEPTEMBER 7.1993 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION 44000 HN DEPT OF REVENUE 12479 VOID OUT CHECK 13596 VOID OUT CHECK 13938 VOID OUT CHECK 13949 VOID OUT CHECK 13977 VOID OUT CHECK 13991 VOlD OUT CHECK 14135 VOID OUT CHECK 3185700 PAYROLL 08-20-93 JULY & JUNE 93 SALES TAX 6656.46 629_5 ~O- 1 .25- 165.81- 84.98- 36098.59- 621.44- 396.94- . $1709978.80 • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. ~A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY'S PROPOSED 1994 THE DATE(S) FOR THE "TRUTH-IN-TAXATION" PUBLIC PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 1994 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES, SETTING HEARING, AND ACCEPTING A ~ ~ WHEREAS, the city Council of the City of Eden Prairie has reviewed the City Manager's recommended 1994 budget and tax levies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has decided to accept these recommendations at this time, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the city Council: 1) Establishes the following proposed taxes on real and personal property within the City of Eden Prairie for the 1994 Budget: Net Levy on Tax Capacity Levy on Market Value Total NET LEVY $12,512,121 312,000 $12,824,121 The proposed total net levy may not be exceeded when the City Council sets the final tax levy for 1994. 2) Sets the following dates for the "Truth-In-Taxation" public hearings on the proposed 1994 tax levy and budget: Public Hearing: Tuesday, November 30, 1993 7:30 PM, Council Chamber Eden Prairie city Center 8080 Mitchell Road Reconvened Public Hearing (if necessary): Thursday, December 9, 1993 Same time and location If the public hearing is completed and closed on November 30, the Council will consider action on the 1994 final tax levy and budget at its regularly-scheduled meeting on December 7, 1993. 3) Accepts the 1994 proposed levy and budget submitted August 20, 1993, at this time. Adopted by the City Council September 7, 1993 Attest: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor John D. Frane, City Clerk • • • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development FROM: Jean Johnson, Zoning Administrator DATE: September 2, 1993 SUBJECT: Satterstrom Appeal of Board's Denial of Variance #93-34 Request Allow a garage addition at a 20.5 foot front yard setback (Code requires a 30 foot minimum front yard setback). Board's Review Board members did visit the site prior to their meeting. The following points were discussed at the Board's meeting: • A hardship has not been demonstrated. • Reasonable use of the property exists. • It has not been demonstrated that a storage shed could not be constructed in the side or rear yard. • A 10 foot addition toward the street will alter the character of the neighborhood and cannot be screened. • Expansion to the garage exists behind the right stall and around the frreplace; or to the right of the entire garage to a 5 foot minimum setback to the side yard. • The proposed addition will limit parking on the driveway and place it on the cul- de-sac. Staff Review The August 6, 1993 Staff Report raised the following alternatives: • a storage shed could be constructed in the side or backyard. • limit garage addition to 6 or 8 feet. The Staff Report did mention that the request may be in keeping with the neighborhood, since Prairie East does have some homes at 20 foot setbacks at comer lots, but a drive of the cul-de- sac will assist members in determining if this request fits into the neighborhood character. ~IRECTORS OF BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Directors of Board of Appeals: July 3, 1093 Our request to the Board is to grant a variance to the building set back code. We live in LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PRAIRIE EAST 2nd ADDITION, 9818 SQUIRE LANE. The home is at the very end of the culdesac. Our request is to add ten (10') feet on too the front of our garage. The addition is to make room for storage of lawn equipment. snow removal equipment, and childrens bicycles (5) . ','1,. and other miscellaneous out-door items. We have three ',children. The current garage has 20'x 9.5' stalls that are smaller then normal, or newer garages being built today, which are 24 x 10' to 12'. Currently we have 192 square feet as compaired too 288 square feet of new construction, per stall. We have elim~nated the possibility of a storage shed in our back yard. The back yards in this area were a swamp prior to development of this housing project. Our back yard, as the other yards in the area, are prone to flooding every spring, and when we receive 1.5" of rain this is a catch basin for all the run-off in the area, which makes it unusable. To this point in time we have had to leave one vehicle out in the driveway, which is not only unsightly to the neighborhood but we are more prone to vandalism and car theft. "; ," 't, "".",1' ' • ~ • r 'i'.'·' • .' -~' :',-: .. ". ;'," ";'':' " -' 1" • '" . ~. ! . • This change in the front entry would also harmonize our house with the surrounding homes. The city code in this case is a hardship, and we respectfully request yOU grant us this small variance. " "I,' Respectfully Yours, " .' ; .,' '/ 'Jim Satterstrom .' i "i,' J' " "',.", . : I • ~ : '! ,.,' .. I·~.'i~···.' . I .. ~, ' ~'.~~,.~~~.:.I' , " ,J ~.,; .. -l, 'j-'2" ,t···~.·"t . ,>':':~:':f,' /. ·;~;:~:~:.:lP " 7 I ,'''I~ 1_ r I I • II 0 • ~ ~ .... .... -..., :. . , .... (') ~ ~ I:) '! :" .... ~ 0 ..., rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~~-¥..:.:..~.~ . "~~~-::--- o / : <.' '..,.. ................ -7 ~ ~ '''. ~~-)-. 0',.. '",:, 1..';',,:::_ . " • . .. August 12, 1993 Vasaly asked why this needed to be done now. Is anything wrong with the facility? Touche said it was too small and the business was growing. They have leased three other hangars. Vasaly asked why there was a 10' setback. Touche said it exists now and they are not changing it. Johnson said that code states a minimum width for driving lane and stalls. wilkus closed the public hearing. MOTION: Dye moved that the Board approve Variance 93-33 subject to the recommendations of Staff Report, contingent upon city Council approval, and that it be communicated to M.A.C. that no future variance requests are to be submitted for commercial businesses (site plan, review process) until MAC submits for city approval utility plans and construction schedule for the airport area of the building faces the runway. • Anderson suggested an amendment that the proponent comply with staff recommendations and work with staff to maximize screening to parking area and part of the • exterior of the building. Dye accepted the amendment. Anderson seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. E. Request #93-34 by James M. Satterstrom of 9818 Squire Lane to permit a garage addition on the front of the existing garage creating a 20.5' front yard setback. City Code requires a 30' front yard setback. James Satterstrom came forwa+d to present the request. He said they would like a variance on the setback for a garage addition. He has a three stall garage now and wants to bring it out towards the front. He understands the setback situation but his property is at the end of the cuI de sac and adding on to the garage will not be very noticeable. The home was built with 20 x 9.5 stalls (small). There is not enough storage space on the property. They had considered a storage barn for the back yard, but it is a run off area and floods. He would like to go all the way across the front and bring the garage out 10'. The entry way would then be more in line with other homes in the area, with the front door set back. Johnson said that this area is part of the Prairie East • Development that allows 20' setback for corner lots, but not ----Board of Adjustments and Appeals 7 • • • cuI de sacs. The proponent wants to construct in the front area as he ~as a large drainage swale in the back yard. The size of the addition could be reduced or the stalls could be staggered. There have been no letters in opposition or support. Vasaly asked if the neighbors were in support of the request. Had he suggested the plans suggested by the city or the staggering of the stalls? Satterstrom answered that the-neighbors are not at all opposed to it. staggering the stalls would cost about $2,500 more. Vasaly asked how the proponent had determined how far out he wanted to build the addition. Wilkus stated he had visited the area and believes the addition toward the cUl-de-sac will not be in keeping with the neighborhood character. Other members agreed. satterstrom answered that the stalls would be about half again as large (20' to 30'). Anderson said she did not understand the hardship although she does understand the need. Codes are for uniformity. Requests from others have been turned down . satterstrom said he had contacted the Crime Prevention Specialists and vandalism may be a problem if the vehicles cannot be inside. The neighborhood starts to look unattractive when vehicles sit outside. Vehicle thefts in Eden Prairie rose 36% in 1992. There is a passageway from cuI de sac to cuI de sac for children in the neighborhood. The temptation for theft and vandalism is there. Anderson said she would have a hard time voting for this request. The proponent already has a three car garage. Many others have only a one car garage. The proponent feels that the hardship is that the City had constructed the neighborhood in such a way that he is unable too have a storage shed in the back yard and he wants to make the area attractive to neighbors. Dye asked if there was adequate space in the back for the storage shed to be built (on the west side as you look at the home) . satterstrom said that there was a 12' elevation drop in that area and also in another area. Vasaly had questions regarding the back yard and drainage area . satterstrom said the drainage area in the back yard goes the entire length and the yard fills up when it rains. The water ----Board of Adjustments and Appeals 8 August 12, 1993 has come up as far as their deck posts in the past. Vasaly asked if an engineer's opinion had been requested on construction of a structure there. Satterstrom said that one can be constructed there, but the accessibility would not be good after rains. Wilkus closed the public hearing. wilkus said he would have a hard time approving this request based upon past history. He said that a three car garage should be adequate and it has not been demonstrated that a storage building cannot be located elsewhere. MOTION: Vasaly moved that the Board deny Variance 93-34 on the grounds that there is no hardship. Dye seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Motion denied. Wilkus told the proponent that he could appeal the decision to the Council. F. Request #93-35 by Penelope Needham of 8685 Westwind Circle to permit a screen porch addition at the rear of the home creating a 10' rear yard setback. City Code requires a 20' rear yard setback. Penelope Needham came forward to present the variance request. She displayed photos of the area of the back yard and front of the house. The home is in The Preserve. She would like a screened porch off the patio door. There is a 10' grass pathway that separates the back yards. She had marked on the photos where the porch would be positioned. The porch would be 12' x 14'. It was made to fit with the house plan. The variance is needed for one corner. There is lots of open space. The Preserve Review Association Design Committee has approved it. The neighbors approve of it also. Care was taken to maintain the original style. The hardship would be that if this were located somewhere else, it would not fit in as well. Johnson said that the porch could be slid farther to the north, but it would need to be connected to a walkway. There will still be a visual difference and there will be screening. The Preserve Association reviewed and approved the structure. No opposition was received from neighbors. Dye noted that if the walkway was included, the setback would be adequate. Vasaly said that this is actually 20 from the lot line, as there is a 10' "cushion". Anderson asked if the variance could be reduced. ----Board of Adjustments and Appeals 9 • • • E. • • • Staff Report Aug. 6, 1993 Request #93-34 by James M. Satterstrom of 9818 Squire Lane to permit a earaee addition on the front of the existine earaee creatine a 20.5' front yard setback. City Code requires a 30' front yard setback. Background The property under variance request consideration is located in the Prairie East 2nd subdivision which was platted in the mid 1970's. As part of the development agreement, setbacks on comer lots allowed a 20' front yard setback on one street frontage if a lot had two street frontages. The home was constructed on a cul-de-sac in 1977. The home has a 3 car attached garage with a 30.5' front yard setback. Request The applicant requests to place a to' garage addition in front of the existing garage. The purpose is for extra storage. This would require a 20.5 front yard setback from the front property line. Alternatives The first alternative would be to construct or place a utility building in the side or rear yard. The applicant has investigated this option and has determined it not acceptable due to a drainage swale which carries neighborhood storm water. A second alternative which might mitigate the visual impact of a garage setback 20.5' from the front lot line would be to permit a two car garage addition of to' on the front, the third stall could be back at a 22.5 setback (an eight foot addition). This is a common architectural method for homes with three car garage stalls. A third alternative would be to limit the garage addition to 6 or 8 feet (24.5 or 22.5 setback). Conclusion The variance request may be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood base on the 20' minimum front yard setbacks on comer lots. A drive of this cul-de-sac area will assist the Board members in determining if the proposed addition will fit well in this cul- de-sac layout of homes and garages. The Board may choose to: 1) 2) 3) Approve as submitted. Approve with amendments. Deny variance request. BARB\JEANIBOAI9334JJ • • • AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIIJHUMAN RIGHTS COMMITtEE TUESDAY, SEYfEMBER 21, 1993 COUNCILMEMBERS: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITI'EE MEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITfEE 6:00 PM, CITY HAIL COUNCIL CHAMBDl 7600 Executive Drive Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean 1IarrU, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock David Grant, Keith J. HalIeland, Dacia Henderson, William. N. Jackson, Judy Schuck, Linda Senes, William R. Tyler, and Julie Savoie Wmgert City Manager Carl JuDie, and AssWant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson STAFF: Director of Human Resources & Community Services Natalie Swaggert I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER ll. UPDATE ON EDEN PRAIRIE MANIFESTO m. APPOINT REPRESENTATIVE TO NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABll.JTY IV. RECOGNITION OF CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BY LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMlTTEF.S A. nnd Annual State Conference Presentation B. Additional Recomition v. FUTURE DIRECTIONS & ACTIVITIFS VI. ADJOURNMENT l • • •