Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/04/1993 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL • TUESDAY, MAY 4, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, and Council Recorder PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PROCLAMATION FOR SENIOR AWARENESS WEEK Page 826 I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS • H. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD THURSDAY. APRIL 20, 1993 Page 827 EL CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST Page 831 B. NORMANDY CREST by Associated Investments, Inc. 2nd Page 832 Reading of an Ordinance requesting Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 3.77 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Associated Investments, Inc.; Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: South of Pioneer Trail and west of Normandy Crest. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5; and Resolution Authorizing Summary and Publication) Continued from April 20, 1993 C. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF NORMANDY Page 839 CREST (located south of Pioneer Trail and west of Normandy Crest) Continued from April 20, 1993 City Council Agenda Tuesday, May 4, 1993 • Page Two D. CDBG JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT, Resolution Page 842 Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Execute a Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie and Hennepin County for Participation in the Community Development Block Grant Program (Resolution) E. CARMODY VILLAGE by Centex Real Estate Corporation. 2nd Page 854 Reading of an Ordinance requesting PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 27.15 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Carmody Village; Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: North of Anderson Lakes Parkway at the Carmody Drive Intersection. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5; and Resolution Authorizing Summary and Publication) Continued from April 20, 1993 F. REQUEST BY MICHAEL SUTI'ON FOR A GRADING PERMIT Page 862 AT 7000 AND 7012 BAKER ROAD • G. RECEIVE 100% PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO Page 863 VILLAGE KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION. LC. 93-5325 (Resolution) H. APPOINTMENT OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FIRM FOR Page 865 CITY CENTER IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. FREEBURG/PERKINS/FELTL ADDITION by Freeburg/Perkins/ Page 866 Feltl. Request for Preliminary Plat of three acres into three lots and Zoning Code variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals: Location: Willow Creek Road (Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from April 20, 1993 B. KINGSTON RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Leland Kottke. Request Page 867 for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.76 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into 6 lots and road right-of-way. Location: South of Kingston Ridge, west of Staring Lake Parkway. (Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from April 20, 1993 City Council Agenda . Tuesday, May 4, 1993 Page Three C. BEARPATH PHASE 2 by Sienna Corporation. Request for Page 875 Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Quasi-Public on 235 acres, request for PUD Concept Review on 419 acres, PUD District Review on 419 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 122.0 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 19.1, acres, and Preliminary Plat of 419 acres into 234 single family lots and 65 multi-family lots. Location: Fact of Riley Lake, north of Pioneer Trail. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and from Rural to RM-6.5; and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from April 20, 1993 D. BLOCK BUSTER VIDEO/LIQUOR STORE by Northco Page 913 Corporation. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the Community Commercial Zoning District on 10.8 acres, preliminary plat of 10.8 acres and Site Plan Review on 10.8 acres into three lots with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of County 411 Road 4 and Highway 5. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment within the Community Commercial Zoning District and Resolution for Preliminary Plat.) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Page 960 VI. ORDINANCES AM)RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Manager 1. Set Joint Meeting Dates - Human Services Committee; Eden • Prairie School Board City Council Agenda Tuesday, May 4, 1993 Page Four C. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources 1111 D. Report of Director of Community Development E. Report of Director of Public Works 1. Review Final Water Tower Schematics 2. Resolution Awarding Contract for Traffic Signals at Mitchell Road and Technology Drive, LC. 93-5313 3. Resolution Awarding Contract for Braxton Drive Improvements, LC. 52-189 F. Report of City Attorney G. Report of Finance Director XI. OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT • i PROCLAMATION City of Eden Prairie Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, senior citizens are important members of our community; and WHEREAS, senior citizens provide valuable resources to our community; and WHEREAS, the community wishes to acknowledge the services and programs available to seniors and their families; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim May 17 through May 23, 1993 to be • "SENIOR AWARENESS WEEK" in the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 4th day of May, 1993. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed the seal of the City of Eden Prairie. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor on behalf of Councilmembers: Richard Anderson Jean Harris H. Martin Jessen • Patricia Pidcock MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Ric Rosow, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Jessen and Pidcock were absent. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. • H. MINUTES A. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD THURSDAY. APRIL 1, 1993 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the Special Council meeting of April 1, 1993, as submitted. Motion carried on a 2 - 0 - 1 vote, with Anderson abstaining. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 6. 1993 MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Tenpas, to approve the minutes of the Council meeting of April 6, 1993, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. C. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP MEETING HELD TUESDAY. APRIL 13. 1993 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the minutes of the Council/Staff Workshop meeting of April 13, 1993, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST • B. NORMANDY CREST by Associated Investments, Inc. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance requesting Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 3.77 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Associated Investments, Inc.; Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance 'Fa7 City Council Minutes 2 April 20, 1993 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: South of Pioneer Trail and west of Normandift Crest. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5; and Resolutio Authorizing Summary and Publication) (Continued to May 4, 1993) C. CARMODY VILLAGE by Centex Real Estate Corporation. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance requesting PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 27.15 acres; Approval of Developer's Agreement for Carmody Village; Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: North of Anderson Lakes Parkway at the Carmody Drive Intersection. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5; and Resolution Authorizing Summary and Publication) (Continued to May 4, 1993) D. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF NORMANDY CREST(located South of Pioneer Trail and West of CSAH 18) (Continued to May 4, 1993) E. RESOLUTIONS #93-80 and #93-81 APPROVING SOUTHWEST MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION AGREEMENTS F. RECOMMENDATION ON FEES FOR FACILITY RENTAL FOR DEAN BOWYER BASEBALL CAMP G. ARBOR DAY/MONTH PROCLAMATION H. PROCLAIMING EARTH DAY THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 1993 • I. 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 14-93 AMENDING CITY CODE. CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11.55. AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUMMARY AND PUBLICATION (Mining Operation, Land Alteration and Environmental Preservation Regulation) (Continued to May 18, 1993) J. RESOLUTION#93-82, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE'S PARTICIPATION IN THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S (MHFA) MINNESOTA CITIES PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPP) K. RELEASE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH SANDY POINTE DEVELOPMENT CORP. FOR ASSESSMENTS OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS L. RESOLUTION #93-83. AWARDING MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS CONTRACTS MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve items A., E. - H., and J. - L., and to continue items B. - D. to the May 4, 1993, meeting and item I. to the May 18, 1993, meeting. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. FREEBURG/PERKINS/FELTL ADDITION by Freeburg/Perkins/Feltl. Request for Preliminaa Plat of three acres into three lots and Zoning Code variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals: Location: Willow Creek Road (Resolution for Preliminary Plat) G'�D City Council Minutes 3 April 20, 1993 • MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to continue this item to the May 4, 1993, meeting. Motion carried unanimously. B. KINGSTON RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Leland Kottke. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1- 13.5 on 2.76 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into 6 lots and road right-of-way. Location: South of Kingston Ridge, west of Starring Lake Parkway. (Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) __ MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to continue the Public Hearing to May 4, 1993. Motion carried unanimously. C. BEARPATH PHASE 2 by Sienna Corporation. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Quasi-Public on 235 acres, request for PUD Concept Review on 419 acres, PUD District Review on 419 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 122.0 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 19.1 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 419 acres into 234 single family lots and 65 multi-family lots. Location: East of Riley Lake, north of Pioneer Trail. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and from Rural to RM-6.5;and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to continue the Public Hearing to May 4, 1993. Motion carried unanimously. 411) V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Harris, and Tenpas voting "aye." VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REQUEST BY BACHMANS INC. FOR AN EARLY GRADING PERMIT Jullie reported that this item had been withdrawn by the proponent. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES A. WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION-Recommendations for Changes in Residential Refuse Collection Tim Colliton, Chairman of the Waste Management Commission, reviewed the Commission's recommendation to divide the City into collection districts. Any licensed refuse hauler could collect trash within an individual district, but only on the weekday specified for that area. • Councilmembers discussed other issues including organizing collection of brush and a possible ordinance amendment to prevent residents from leaving trash containers on the street, other than on di')a9 City Council Minutes 4 April 20, 1993 the day of pick up. The Council commended the Commission on its work and directed Staff proceed with preparation of an ordinance based on the Commissions recommendations. IX. APPOINTMENTS X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Manager 1. Naming of New City Hall (Continued from April 6, 1993) Upon discussion, Councilmembers agreed upon the name "Eden Prairie City Center." 2. Award of Bids for Eden Prairie City Center Dan O'Brien reviewed the details of the bids received and explained the phased occupancy for the building, starting with the school, then city hall offices, and finally the Police Department. Jullie reviewed the terms of the agreement with the School District. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to award the bids for the remodeling of Eden Prairie City Center to Stahl Construction in the amount of $5,250,000. Motion carriii unanimously. C. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource 1. Recommendation from the Natural Resources Preservation Study Committee to Hire Naturalist to Study Seven Sites MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Harris, to hire Barton Aschman & Associates to perform the study of the seven sites identified by the Natural Resources Preservation Study Committee for the amount of$10,000. Motion carried unanimously. D. Report of Director of Community Development E. Report of Director of Public Works F. Report of City Attorney G. Report of Finance Director XI. OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT • MOTION TO ADJOURN: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson. Mayor Tenpas adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. 4111 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK' S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST May 4, 1993 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM. ) GAS FITTER Gerten's Farm Market, Inc. Conway Mechanical Lund Martin Construction, Inc. Metro Gas Installers Shuldhiess Construction Schwab-Vollhaber-Lubratt Corp. Single Ply Systems Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING 4110 PLUMBING Conway Mechanical Schwab-Vollhaber-Lubratt Corp. McGuire Mechanical Services, Inc. SEPTIC SYSTEMS UTILIT Y INST ALLER Elmer J. Peterson Company Eide Plumbing Company Swedlund Septic Service Stepaniak Construction Company SCAVENGER CIGARETTE Elmer J. Peterson Company MA MA D'S Swedlund Septic Service ON SALE BEER FOOD VEHICLE FOR DELIVERY Residence Inn by Marriott Novelty Vending These license have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Pat So ie Licensing NORMANDY CREST • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 12-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in AKeach District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. • SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1,entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of May 4, 1993, entered into between Associated Investments, Inc. and Argus Development, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement is hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of March, 1993, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor 41) PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on (6 (2k Description for platting: • That part cf the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Secticn 36, Exhibit "A" Township 116 Ncrth, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point cn the North line of said Northeast 1/4, 450 feet West of the Northeast comer; thence South1110 235 feet; thence West 30 feet; thence South 225 feet; thence West 120 feet: thence South 330 feet; thence West to the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence North 790 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Secticn; thence East to the point of tecinnina; except the following: That part cf the Ncrth 790 feet of the Northeast 1/4 cf the Northeast 1/4 cf Section 3E, Township 116 Ncrth, Rance 22 West of the Fifth Principal 1Mleridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. described as follows: • Eecinning at a point an the Ncrth lire cf said Northeast 1/i of the Northeast 1/4 located 450 feet West cf the Northeast corner, thence South parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1i4; a distance of 235 feet: thence West parallel with the South lire of said Ncrth 750 feet, a distance cf 30 feet; thence South parallel with the East line Cf said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance Cf 225 fee thence West parallel with South line cf said Ncrth 790 feet, a distance of 120 f et, thence South parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4, advance of ;30 feet to :he South line cf the said North 790 feet: thence West alcnc the South line of said Ncrth 750 fe•=t tc the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence Ncrth alcrc the said West line of the Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 114 a distance of 490 feet; thence East parallel with the South line cf said Ncrth 790 feet a distance of 720 feet: thence Ncrth parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 a distance of 125 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said North 790 feet a distance cf 30 feet: thence Ncrth parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 175 feet more or less to the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1,4; thence East along the North line of said Northeast 1/4 _ of the Northeast 1/4 to the point of becinning. • Description for rezoning: • That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northeast 1/4, 450 feet Wesc of the Northeast corner; thence South 235 feet; thence West 30 feet; thence South 225 feet; thence West 180 feet; thence South 330 feet; thence West to the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence North 790 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section; thence East to the point of beginning; except the following: That part of the North 790 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 116 North, Range 22 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 located 450 feet West of the Northeast corner; thence South parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; a distance of 235 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said North 790 feet, a distance of 30 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 225 feet; thence West parallel with South line of said North 790 feet, a distance of 180 feet, thence South parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4, adiscance of 330 feet to the South line of the said North 790 feet; thence West along the South line of said North 790 feet to the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence North along the said West line of the Northeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 a distance of 490 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said North 790 feet a distance of 630.00 feet; thence11111 Northwesterly to a point on the North line of said Northeast Quarter distant 335.00 feet West of the point of beginning; thence East along the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 to the point of beginning. l; NORMANDY CREST • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 12-93 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, an Ordinance was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of March, 1993; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of that Ordinance, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. • C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 4, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • NORMANDY CREST CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 12-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, IIVIINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at South of Pioneer Trail and west of Normandy Crest, from Rural to R1-13.5, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. • • • • ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Douglas B. Tenpas City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the . (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) f, S �t • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT NORMANDY CREST THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of May 4, 1993, by Associated Investments, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and Argus Development Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for a Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 3.79 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.5 acres into 8 single family lots, two outlots, and road right-of-way, all for construction of a single family residential development, all said 5.5 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, all said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property"; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. 12-93, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 411) 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated February 9, 1993, approved by the City Council on March 16, 1993, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR STREETS, UTILITIES, EROSION CONTROL: Developer agrees that, prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of, plans for streets, trails, sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Developer shall construct the utilities, as shown on Exhibit B, to the northwesterly corner of the subdivision for further extension (by others) concurrently with the project. Storm sewer utility plans shall include a detailed analysis of the complete storm • sewer and pond design emergency overflow calculations. Developer shall also obtain an easement in the name of the City for the storm sewer outfall over the adjoining property to the north. • Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 4. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT: Prior to the release of a final plat for the property, the Developer shall execute an assessment agreement for the following costs: A. Storm drainage improvements constructed by the City in the amount of$7,287.92. B. Trunk utility assessments in the amount of $15,718.50. 5. LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HOUSE CONSTRUCTION: Developer agrees to construct the house on Lot 1, Block 1 up to the 10 foot sideyard setback along the north property line to allow for buffering between the existing sidewalk and the proposed house. 6. GRADING AND LAND ALTERATION PERMITS: Prior to any construction or development on any portion of the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and to obtain the City Engineer's approval of, a land alteration permit for the Property. Said permit shall include a revised landscape plan reflecting evergreen trees along the proposed frontage road for screening purposes. Developer agrees to comply with the City's erosion control policy. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement, or cause to be implemented, such plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. NO-BUILD RESTRICTION FOR OUTLOTS A AND B: Developer, Associated Investments, Inc. acknowledges that Outlot A and Outlot B of the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, will not be developed at this time. Developer understands that Outlot A is currently shown on the Comprehensive Guide Plan as low density residential, and that any future development on Outlot A will require review and approval through the land development process. Developer further acknowledges that Outlot B is intended for use as part of the County Road #18 frontage road and will be reserved for such use. • c64ri • 8. VARIANCES GRANTED BY FINAL ORDER : Developer has obtained the following variances from the Board of Appeals with respect to requirements of the City Code, Chapter 11, Sections 11.03 and 11.50: Ordinance Proposed Frontage Variance - Lot 2, Block 1: 85' 58' Lot 3, Block 1: 85' 55' Developer agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of approval of said Final Order # a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit D, and hereby made a part hereof. • • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE El) HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF NORMANDY CREST WHEREAS, the plat of Normandy Crest has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Normandy Crest is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 15, 1993. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. • C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 4, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • Y 144 � v MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor Tenpas and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Alan D. Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Engineering Technician DATE: April 15, 1993 SUBJECT: Final Plat of Normandy Crest PROPOSAL: The Developer, Tom Robertson, has requested City Council approval of the final plat of Normandy Crest. Located south of Pioneer Trail, east of County Road 18, and along the northerly extension of Lee Drive, the plat contains 5.4 acres to be divided into eight (8) single family lots, two (2) outlots, and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Ownership of Outlot A will be retained by the Developer for a possible future commercial site. Outlot B is intended for future road purposes with the construction of County Road 18 and Pioneer Trail improvements. HISTORY: The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council March 16, 1993 per Resolution No. 93-53. • A second Reading of Ordinance No. 12-93, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1- 13.5, is scheduled for final approval May 4, 1993. The Developer's Agreement referred to within this report is scheduled for execution May 4, 1993. VARIANCES: All variance requests must be processed through the Board of Appeals. UTILITIES AND STREETS: All municipal utilities and roadways will be installed throughout this project in conformance with the Developer's Agreement and the requirements of City Code. Additional easements will be necessary to accommodate utility extensions. These easements lie between Lots 2 and 3, Lots 5 and 6, and Lots 6 and 7. Recommend that plat be revised to reflect easements prior to release of the final plat. As required in the Developer's Agreement, the Developer shall enter into an assessment agreement for storm drainage improvements in the amount of $7,287.92 and trunk sanitary sewer and watermain in the amount of $15,718.50. PARK DEDICATION: The requirements for park dedication are covered in the Developer's Agreement. • r` LJ O Final Plat of Normandy Crest • April 15, 1993 Page 2 of 2 BONDING: Bonding for all public improvements must be provided prior to release of the final plat. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the final plat of Normandy Crest subject to the requirements of this report, the Developer's Agreement, and the following: 1. Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $135 2. Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $588.28 3. Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $320 4. Revision of plat to include additional drainage and utility easements for extension of utilities 5. Execution of assessment agreement JJ:ssa cc: Tom Robertson • 4111 Paul Thorp, HTPO • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: David Lindahl, Planner DATE: April 22, 1993 SUBJECT: CDBG JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT The City's participation in the Community Development Block Program (CDBG) is assured through a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County (entitlement agency). This Agreement outlines all regulations relevant to administering the CDBG Program. The term of the current Agreement expires at the end of 1993. To continue participating in the CDBG Program the City must sign a new Joint Cooperation Agreement that will be in effect through 1996. Approving the attached Resolution will authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Joint Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City Council. S S <eqa CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs; and WHEREAS, the City and the County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order to continue to operate as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and the County be a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County and be executed effective October 1, 1993 through October 1, 1996;and that the Mayor and the City Clerk be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. • *ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of May, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST John D. Frane, City Clerk • Urban Hennepin County Contract No. A07483 1111 Community Development Block Grant Program JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT .'I AGinaui ..:.icaacie...:a d:;::>en erect Into b an between : i Gp ''r;#: ' ` ::::.. State.:o:f,;M nnesotg,.:hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY, A 240 Govs nen n ente : Minnea :oli:s.:, Minn esota i55487, and the ci.ties'�>eXectztfng i s Master.Agreement, each hereinaf~tarA re . ectivel: referred to as "COOPERA.TIING:UNIT:f":.isa d parties t s this Agreement eaclt::::bein ovaernmen:tal unis s..nf.the ::of i nnes.:..ta.,:::an:.:.:ma e:. su .t o<itin 3esot Stastutes >`:«Sec`.t ...,.:`7 ':::;9 WITNESSETH: COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that COOPERATING UNIT share i.ts authority to carry gut Ostential commun t ;>;::;develo went: and Sous .n . activities::>::with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY pgE4iii*ONii0got414ttmcommunity Development Block Grant and HOME Invest e'nt Pazr ;ersh i_p funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions. 4111 COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the e .edon.it of this Agreement that it understands that it . <:;:;.:.: May not also apply for grants -under the State CDBG Program from approprIat .ens far f :sca . years during which i:t is participating in the Urban County Program, and :. .:.....:...:..... ... • not . .art i c i :4.o..l.4vi'a iHOME >Consortium except throu > e Ur an .........................................................................................................................................................................................:,..cut . I. DEFINITIONS The definitions contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them: A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. ) . B. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not limited to 24 CFR Part 570. C. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. D. "Cooperating Unit" means any city or town in Hennepin County which has 4110 entered into a cooperation agreement which is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County which is a party to each Agreement. ?LILT . E. "Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community Development Block Grant program. F. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people. II. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities, specifically . urban renewal and publicly assisted housing and authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant and,Hp.. appropriations, for the Federal Fiscal Years i g9.4. .I.9 Rva;n:d lg ma:nd f r ; ryany o gr tern me<':generated frot the expenditure of:such fume$ III. AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement is fora period commencing on October 1, 1993, and terminating no sooner than the end of the program year covered by the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 1996, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds granted to the County for such period. Gam;':>shall iiot :::...::... Q© ING UNIT prior to the end of the Urban Co my . ualifi ate rn period than::> e A reement;s l <auto naticall be renewed t ess t s:::;Cezn aa.tie ;>::in + ititi-;::: ::<:e .the`. art ::::<:»tither COUNTY':>or;:COOPERATI G €NIT:>as`> exerc se<:the o ion.:::tv...te m -i : C. :.; .. :::: NIT:.:;fa l>::to:::>:exercise...tha:t..:.option <«it>a l `':>:....,. .,, .: ;,.;_> , .::.:::,..:...: .:.:.. .:..... :: ::.:::to :.` `:::: :;:,:`�'< U a ..Co rb z�.,...un .:: ua3. --::.:.:::. .. .��gr�ght.... ....�i.ect...to b excluded is.,.;.;.he. da.# ,s .ec f ex b .. .. ,n;;the trb Count -lificatiom No't ce f:o :.;.;; :: :.;:;;:.;;;;y ;:» Y ......:.. :... ., ire t e z est.ua f ca on pe od _, ::..:::.::.;,>..:. inco : rate>any c-,an es.:necess to meet t .e:re.uirements or.cuq erat-£on a g:-':'cements s ;: r . a . :ount :,,.: a .i.f cation:Notice a ic. b �,::a..le;��fu r :cl�a:<;-�:e an><: z� 1ai�fi et..��o:.tt�.;::5.�:.:;the:.:;Urb�..�.��.::..::.. :Q�:::.:::::::::::::.:�.::::.:::::::::::::::::::::.:. :::>:::pP.... ..... ...........- ........---............. . ..... '•.:;:.:;2.::;�� " .�.';'',."..>i� »�:::.;::<:.:.i� �;:_:.�::�:�>:::: :::;�_::::;:::;:;;::<:>:::::::;::'�';�::: the:next::qu lif ication;:;o.f<the.:; suoh. an amendment tw the A: , eement shade::::::;automatica:::l:::::<te:rminatt btj'ie:=:=A. reealeni:t following:fie ex a td�Lure of all CDBG and HOME uncle allocated £�xr use 0f3'ERA ING tsd c io : Tote tt standin .;any o ar. prow ion ;a it Agree a t, this i^ee• xn terminated at:;.:tile end of t e program period during which HUD w the aws: is 1111111 de.stgtatiox of C NTY as axe Urban County under the Act. • 2 ?LIS This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT 411 and COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development, and in no event shall the Agreement be filed later than Kwageomm COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the applicant's certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title I of the BoOWing a game ;n .ty X)evelnpmetit. Act cif 19:74g. The Mexicans With oro iU iiiiWi >aiiV§§I t and zither aippi cabi :a. s IV. ACTIVITIES COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out within the terms of this Agreement certain projects involving one or more of the essential activities eligible for funding under the Act. COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds pursuant to 24 CFR §570.300 et seq. IIICOOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows: A. COOPERATING UNIT will in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule prepare and provide to COUNTY, in a prescribed form, an annual request for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives. B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b) , it is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and in a form prescribed by COUNTY. C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements stated in paragraph B. above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances a written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY. D. COOPERATING UNIT shall implement all activities funded for each annual program pursuant to this Agreement within Eighteen (18) months of the authorization by HUD to expend the basic grant amount. S 3 ?Lf (o 1. Funds for all activities not implemented within Eighteen (18) months shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement. 2. Implementation period extensions may be granted upon request in cases where the authorized activity has been initiated and/or subject of a binding contract to proceed. E. COOPERATING UNIT shall use funds provided pursuant to Section V. of this Agreement t! tale extent ptacttcable to undertake no more than Three (3) grant-funded activities administered by the COOPERATING UNIT. Each activity shall have a budget of at least Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) , or the total amount of the planning allocation of COOPERATING UNIT if less than Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) . A COOPERATING UNIT may assign less than Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) to an activity when the activity is one that is programmed by at least one other COOPERATING UNIT and administered by only one COOPERATING UNIT or' the COMM/ on behalf of the others, provided that the total activity budget is at least Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) . F. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to accomplish the community development program and housing assistance goals as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (cHAs); G. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all programs and/or activities funded 4111 in part or in full by grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing, employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall in implementing all programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount comply with all applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY. H. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from receiving CDBG funding for any activities. I. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process as established by COUNTY in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. J. COOPERATING UNIT shall comply with all of the administrative guidelines of the COUNTY now in effect or as hereafter promulgated. K. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY. • 41/1 .,:>»>;>: :°Isa ioy rrrah bi.ti g t se use of a eessive force bass nfc�rc men 4111 a genies within Its uri.sd ction a ainst an mndIv cuaIs;en a ed. in nan.::v v1ent:;c tvi1,tx`ghts,.;;demonstrat ons ::.;am i::<;:::»>:>€° :;: ...o,: ..a ... io0 'e<«:S: to<>..au4...: oc:a7::>.:::l�aws .a ai r :,:;;;;;:.;:.;�::.;:.:p.;;7.�e3� of enf rci.x�g app7,:::...: b� ::..:.: :.:;.:;::. :.;:..... �:::..:.;:.:.:: .,>:.:>:.,.;:.;;;:.; ;;;: :::�:.::::.:::.::.:. piiysical�.,y barring entance to of exit from a facility c t` t cation wh:ic a the subject of such non vi:s le t t vli tirgttt deg on rat:cros w th n.;its... ur s.dict on ............................. COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows: A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies on an annual basis all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the Act. B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of the request for funding. C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program and housing assistance goals. D. COUNTY shall upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT agree to administer local housing rehabilitation grant programs funded 'pursuant to the 411/ Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall receive Twelve percent (12%) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity. E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer for a possible fee other programs and/or activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING 1 • UNIT. F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY. V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under 1Ciril31 p. of the Act shall be allocated as follows: A. COUNTY shall retain Ten percent (10%) of the annual basic grant amount for the undertaking of eligible activities. 411, B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be apportioned by COUNTY to COOPERATING UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C of this section for the purpose of allowing the COOPERATING UNITS to make requests for the use of funds so apportioned. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding. C. Each COOPERATING UNIT will use as a target for planning purposes an amount which bears the same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between: 1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS. 2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all COOPERATING UNITS. 3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS. 4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall be counted twice. D. It is the intent of this section that said planning allocation utilize the same basic elements for allocation of funds as are set forth in 24 CFR §570.4. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data furnished by HUD. ill/ E. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request its planning allocation, or a portion thereof, the amount not requested shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement. VI. FINANCIAL MATTERS A. Reimbursement to the COOPERATING UNIT for expenditures for the implementation of activities funded under the Act shall be made upon receipt by the COUNTY of Summary of Project Disbursement form and Hennepin County Warrant Request, and supporting documentation. B. All funds received by COUNTY under the Act as reimbursement for payment to COOPERATING UNITS for expenditure of local funds for activities funded under the Act shall be deposited in the County Treasury. C. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the Act and Regulations. Such records and accounts will be in such form as to permit reports required of the County to be prepared therefrom and to permit the tracing of grant funds and program income to final expenditure. 4111 D. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree to make available all records and 4111 accounts with respect to matters covered by this Agreement at all reasonable times to their respective personnel and duly authorized federal officials. Such records shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than three years from the last receipt of program income resulting from activity implementation. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall perform all audits as may be required of the basic grant amount and resulting program income as required under the Act and Regulations. E. COOPERATING UNIT shall inform COUNTY of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds it has received and shall pay to COUNTY all program income generated except as derived from activities with an approved revolving account. When program income is generated by an activity that is only partially assisted with CDBG funds, the income shall be prorated to reflect the percentage of CDBG funds used. 1. COUNTY will retain Ten percent (10%) of all program income paid to COUNTY to defray administration expenses. 2. The remaining Ninety percent (90%) of the program income paid to COUNTY shall be credited to the grant authority of COOPERATING UNIT whose project generated the program income and shall be used for fundable and eligible CDBG activities consistent with this Agreement. 3. COOPERATING UNIT and<COUNTY-are authorized to retain program income 4111 derived from projects with an approved revolving account provided such income is used only for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements as they may apply. 4. COOPERATING UNIT shall maintain appropriate records and make reports to COUNTY as may be needed to enable COUNTY to monitor and report to HUD on the use of any program income. 5. Any program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the closeout or change in status of COOPERATING UNIT shall be paid to COUNTY. F. Should an approved activity be determined to represent an ineligible expenditure of grant funds, the COOPERATING UNIT responsible shall reimburse the COUNTY for such ineligible expense. 1. All reimbursements for ineligible expenditures shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement unless decreed otherwise by a Federal regulatory body or by final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction. 2. When it is determined by the COUNTY that grant funds have been expended on an eligible activity and through no fault of the COOPERATING UNIT the project fails or is no longer eligible, the 411/ 7/''() return of grant funds shall be reallocated in the same manner as program income in Section VI.E. of this Agreement unless decreed otherwise by a Federal regulatory body or by final determination of 111, a court of competent jurisdiction. VII. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION OR IMPROVEMENT The following provisions shall apply to real property acquired or improved in whole or in part using CDBG funds. A. COOPERATING UNIT shall promptly notify COUNTY of any modification or change in the use of real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement including disposition and comply with 24 CFR §570.505. B. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY an amount equal to the current fair market value (less any portion thereof attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds) of property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG regulations. Said reimburseme shall be provided to COUNTY itt the :tom � ;:;::;says;.:>:;ox:<::<;�.ran$fer o t e proger��r:- .....�zch rezm�xu �ue��.;:::atia�.�._g.:ior �Se required...:. ....the....condi:ti;ons ©f.:...2+.... C 'K....§570 503(b)(8)( ) <' a .> d satisfie ;Fai ; market value shall be established by a.currestt,,wr teen appraisal b .. a... :quali.fied apprai•set CO t X w ll have ."o ti: ::, requi:rinng>:>a„.second appraisal of tex review o£ the .initial ap rai sal 4110 C. Program income generated from the disposition or transfer of property prior to or subsequent to the closeout, change of status or termination of this Agreement shall be treated as stipulated in Section VI. E. of this Agreement. VIII.• METROPOLITAN CITIES An metropolitan cit executingthis A reement shall defer their entitlement Y P y g status and become part of Urban Hennepin County. INZON OF` COUNSEL The:: 3cii e . .:. a s i::: el if x `:the.,. ....nn... ...Ii....... _ ... .t .rrse. av�n ::: = -v esr '3>....: . A ee a ><>:;:hereb.. ne tha .. the:::;: :errs: and>::.rovisions of the: A regiment: are full author zed;:::under:<: .testa»>:and:::::loca :::>=:law:::>::and:...that:::>:>the::::::A reement<:. rov de ::..::. ...: . . author`: y:::<for:>':<COUNTY*i::m><::ui dertake sir>>:::>ass s:t::::in undertaki n - .es:sential:.: vmin n �t : development and �x sing as �. � :::<::;::::.>.:;:::.:: �.::., r P .f:c 11� urban renexaal. and publicly assisted.ht usi,ng. :. Assistant County Attorney 4111 J ; 1111 X. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on , 1993, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. Upon proper execution, this COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA Agreement will be legally valid and binding. By: Chairman of its County Board And: Deputy/Associate County Administrator Assistant County Attorney Attest: Date: Deputy County Auditor APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Assistant County Attorney Date: 9 6`), XI. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION 1111 COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing body having duly approved this Agreement on May 18 , 1993, and pursuant to such approval and the proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement, contract A07483 . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: Its Mayor And: Its CITY MANAGER Date: May 18, 1993 CITY MUST CHECK ONE: The City is organized pursuant to: Plan A X Plan B Charter 4111 3/26/934111 10 �5� • CARMODY VILLAGE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 13-93-PUD-2-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development RM-6.5 District 13-93-PUD-2-93 (hereinafter "PUD-2-93-RM- 6.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of May 4, 1993, entered into between Carmody Village, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter"Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD- 2-93-RM-6.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-2-93-RM-6.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-2-93-RM-6.5 is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-2-93-RM-6.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-2-93-RM-6.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 2-93-RM-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph OB, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereb. adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of March, 1993, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of May, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on . • Exhibit A • Carmody Village LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract A: • The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 116, Ronge 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that pert of scid Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying northeasterly and northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 51 minutes 00 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line of scid Southwest Quarter of the Southeast • Quarter, c distance of 1020.00 feet, to the point of beginning of the line to be cescribed: thence South 35 degrees 39 minutes 29 seconds East, a distance of 1211.52 feet; thence South 88 degrees 51 minutes G0 seconds East, a distance of 3C0.00 feet to the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and scid line there terminating. • AND Cutlet A, DEER CREEK TWO, according to the plat of record thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. • • • 411 • . •.. .: .2. . • • . . • . . . • • • . • CARMODY VILLAGE mk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 13-93-PUD-2-93 AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, an Ordinance was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of March, 1993; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of that Ordinance, which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That aprinted copyof the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection byanyperson g P during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. h 1 be recorded intheordinance book, D. That Ordinances alec alongwithproof ofpublication required �1 by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 4, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 411 ,n 1 CARMODY VILLAGE • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 13-93-PUD-2-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at North of Anderson Lakes Parkway at the Carmody Drive Intersection, from Rural to RM-6.5, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Douglas B. Tenpas City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT • CARMODY VILLAGE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of May 4, 1993, by Centex Homes, a Nevada Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, Preliminary Plat of 27.15 acres into 18 lots and 4 outlots for construction of 184 townhome units, all on 27.15 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No.13-93-PUD-2-93,Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed afi .approved by the City Council on March 16, 1993, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 4. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT AND TREE REPLACEMENT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property, which will include mitigation of tree loss for 11 caliper inches of trees, among other conditions and requirement 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN REVISIONS: Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall submit to the Senior Planner and receive the Senior Planner's approval of a revised landscape plan with additional shade and conifer trees as depicted in Exhibit D attached hereto. Upon approval of the Senior Planner, Developer agrees to construct or cause to be constructed said landscaping improvements concurrent with site construction and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C attached hereto. 6. SIDEWALKS: Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources and receive the Director's approval of plans for five-foot wide concrete sidewalks on the west side of Carmody Drive extension. Upon approval by the Senior Planner, Developer agrees to construct or cause to be constructed said sidewalk concurrent with site construction, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C attached hereto. 7. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The City hereby grants the following waivers to the City code requirements within the RM-6.5 Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the property and incorporate said waivers as part of the PUD. A. Density from 6.7 to 6.76 units per acre. B. Front yard setback from 30 to 25 feet for Lots 1, 2, 12, 13, 16, and 18. C. A private street. • • D. Street frontage less than 90 feet for a corner Lot for lots 14. E. Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 fronting on a private street. 8. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the Senior Planner and receive the Senior Planner's approval of samples of exterior materials to be implemented on the structures on the property. Upon approval of the Senior Planner, Developer shall construct or cause to be constructed said exterior materials in accordance with provisions of Exhibit C. 9. OTHER AGENCY PERMITS: Prior to the issuance by the City of any permit for construction of footings or foundation or structure on the property, Developer agrees to obtain approval from the following agencies for such development on the property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and to provide proof of such approvals to the City: A. Approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Riley Purgatory Creek District for fill within the wetland area on the property as depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto. Upon approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District, Developer agrees to complete such construction and development as approved by such agencies in accordance with the terms and conditions of such agency approval and in accordance with the • terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 10. PARK DEDICATION: Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shaill dedicate Ou. C and D to the City for park purposes in accordance with Exhibit C. 11. PARKING LOT: Developer shall grade an area for an 8 car parking lot according to plans supplied by Park, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff within Outlot C. I )eveloper agrees to grade or cause to be graded said parking lot concurrent with site construction and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C attached hereto. • • - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Alan Gray, City Engineer FROM: Jeffrey Johnson DATE: April 29, 1993 SUBJECT: Mike Sutton Grading Permit Mike Sutton is requesting City Council approval of a grading permit to prepare two separate lots for eventual house construction. The two lots Mr. Sutton owns are located south of Theresa Place and west of Baker Road. Please refer to attached plan. Each lot contains approximately 2-1/2 acres. The northerly lot is vacant at this time and the southerly lot contains an existing house and garage. The existing house and garage on the southerly lot are intended to be removed when a building permit for the new house location is applied for. Presently, access to the existing house is provided from Baker Road by a shared driveway with the adjoining property to the south through an • easement agreement. Access to the new house would continue through the present driveway location and easement agreement. Recommend approval of the request for grading permit by Mike Sutton subject to the following: • Installation of erosion control along the downhill limits of grading • Approval of a grading permit issued through the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District • Within ten days of completion of grading operations, all disturbed areas be restored with topsoil, seed, and disc anchored mulch. JJ:ssa • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR I.C. 93-3325 Village Knolls 2nd Addition Public Improvements BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City • Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of H.T.P.O. 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on May 4, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk • I Vu ._V -� 1V a' V• J . 11J 1` '+ I I\I�11 V♦ I 1 I.JI VilLlI 1 I'.f'I l It 1L I CJ1V I-. VL • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA • 100% PE'1T1'ION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: • The undersigned are all the fee owners of the real property described below and herein petition for the Eden Prairie City Council to proceed with making the following described improvements: Specify . Type General Location Sanitary Sewer Village Knolls II Watermain " Storm Sewer Street Paving Other Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the undersigned hereby waive any public hearing to be held on said improvements, and further state and agree that the total cost of said improvements shall be specially assessed against the property described below in accordance with the City's special assessment policies. We er derst that the preliminary, estimated total cost for the said improvements is 110 Street Address or other Legal Description Names and Addresses of Petitioners ' of Property to be Served (Must be owners of record) Sr�0 .y ri S` N L: �-r- • 1 � ; N -/fit (For City Use) Date Received: 1/f /?j"3 •Project No.: Council Consideration: —S-71` 1 t , Liltt MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council •THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Kevin Schmieg, Dir. of Inspections, Facilities, and Safety Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager DATE: April 29, 1993 SUBJECT: Property Management Firm for Citycenter Property The City will be both an owner-occupant and landlord at the Citycenter. Managing a property of this size is a major undertaking, in terms of both physical maintenance and business relationships. In acknowledgment of the complexity of this responsibility, a decision was made early on to engage the services of a property management firm for physical and fiscal operations of the Citycenter. Staff, with the assistance of Sterling Group, Inc. , solicited proposals and interviewed firms to provide property/facility management services. Such services as preventive maintenance, repairs and minor improvements, parking lot sweeping and snow removal, landscaping, cafeteria management, rent collection, and paying bills would be managed by the firm. The property manager would also assign its staff as needed to the building. (In the City's case, we would provide custodial services .from the Facilities division staff. ) A property management firm would also facilitate arm's-length business relationships with the other tenants in the building. Nine firms responded to the RFP, and four firms were interviewed a few weeks ago. Each of the firms was capable and provided a slightly different mix of services. The firms and their annual base management fees were as follows: Eberhardt $24,000 Accent 28, 000 CB Commercial 36,000 Welsh Properties 39, 000 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Council award a contract for facility management services to Eberhardt per its proposal. Upon satisfaction of the City Attorney of the contract, the Mayor and City Manager would be authorized to execute it. (The contract would be for 17 months beginning on August 1, 1993 . ) Eberhardt's proposal was the best one overall. The staff Eberhardt assigned to Citycenter was experienced and one which had the most promise of an effective working relationship. Eberhardt demonstrated its commitment to staffing this project creatively in order to meet the City's needs and to control costs. The firm also manages several similar-sized office projects, including the Landmark Center which is partially owned and lilloccupied by the St. Paul Port Authority. This experience of managing a government-owned and -occupied facility was unique among the management companies interviewed, and a perspective that should benefit the City. :: = c• 1 P - la WINTHROP & WINSTINE • A PAOFEOOIONAL A■OOCIArION SHERMAN WINT�cOP JON J.MOOAN;ON ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW JUUC WIOLEY SCMNELL OAVID A.KRISTAL RODERT R.WEINST.NC SANORA J.MARTIN THOMAS N.SOYO KARL A.WCOCR RICHARD A.HOC.. OARY W.SCHOKMILLCR JOSEPM C.NAUMAN JONATMAN O.ORAN ROOCA O.OOROON Toot O.IRNC5A 3200 MINNe30TA WORLD TRADE CENTER DANIEL C.BECK •ALOK VIOYARTMI STEVEN C.TOuREK SCOTT J.OONOOEKC CPIC J.NYSTROM TOMAS L.STAFVQRD STEPHEN J.SNvOCR PETER J.0LCCKCt 30 EAST SEVENTH STRCCT KRISTIN L.PCTERSON CARLA J.PEDERSEN MART KVLlER ROOCRT S.3OSKIN JOANN(L.MATZCN JAMCS W DICAIIINO DAVIO P.PCAREDN EDWARD J.DRCNTTEL SAINT PAUL,MINN ESOTA 65101 WILLIAM L.WINBON CATHERINE A.OOMINOUCS THOMAS M.HART w JE/►REY R.ANSEL EVAN D.COOOS CMRIOTOPHCR w.MAOCL DARRON C.KNUTS ON LAURIE A.KNOCKE YELCPMONE 76121 2o0'84OO THOMAS A.WALKCR SUZANNC M.SPCLLACY JOHN A.KNAPP LLOYD W.OAOOMS GINA M.CROTHC POLLEN NICMCLE D.VAIL.ANCOVRT JUUC A.WIt.LIAMSON FAX IAI$1 202 9J47 PATRICK W.WCOCR JOSCPN 3.FRICOOERC DAVID E.MORAN,.R. OETSY J.LOVSHIN CHAALCS A,OURANY Of COUNSEL OONALO J.OROwN MARK T.JOHNSON DIRECT DIAL CRAIC A.CPANDT DANICL W.HARDY (612) 290-8481 OFCOVNSE. April 30, 1993 VIA FACSIMILE #937-7411 Ms. Joyce Provo . City Manager's Office City of :,den Prairie Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 III Re: John E. and Mary Jo Feld; 7012 Willow Creek Road Dear Joyce: As you know, this firm represents John and Mary Jo Feltl. As Mary Jo Feld discussed with you in a telephone conversation this morning, the Feltls are requesting that the public hearing concerning the above-referenced property currently scheduled to be held during the May 4, 1993 City Council meeting be continued until the June 1, 1993 City Council meeting. Thank you for your help and assistance. Very truly yours, WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A. r r cileir • . as M. Hart TMH/deo/592ss • cc: John E. and Mary Jo Feld Roger Pauly, Esq. • 4 r KINGSTON RIDGE 2ND ADDITION • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF KINGSTON RIDGE 2ND ADDITION FOR LELAND KOTTKE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Kingston Ridge 2nd Addition for Leland Kottke dated April 16, 1993, consisting of 2.76 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of May, 1993. • Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 7(11 SSi0 • 3- 27-- • B. KINGSTON RIDGE 2ND ADDITION by Leland Kottke. Request for rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.76 acres and Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into 6 lots and road right-of-way. Location: South of Kingston Ridge, west of Starring Lake Parkway. r representing the ro onentpresented theplans for the 2.76acre siteto Ron Krueger, proponent be developed into 6 lots. Krueger stated that the original cul-de-sac concept would be followed. Sandstad asked how the Kottke's would obtain access to their home. Krueger replied that ail easement had existed for years. Franzen replied that Dave Olsen from the engineering department was tracking the easement through City records. Sandstad asked how wide the City's property was in this area. Franzen replied approximately 200 feet. Clish asked if any existing buildings would be removed. Krueger replied that a shed would be taken down. Schlampp stated that this site was on a knoll and the cul-de-sac was located at the high point of the knoll. Schlampp question how the water flow to the south would be affected by the loss of approximately 25% of acreage to homes and driveways. Schlampp questioned what would happen to the waterflow and if it needed to be controlled. Krueger replied that the watershed would run onto the road and drain down to Victoria. Clinton asked how erosion would be controlled in the area to the north during construction. Krueger replied that hay bails or silt fence would be installed. Franzen replied that this area had a history of erosion from the slopes. Franzen stated that the single row of hay bails was a past method to control erosion. He added that current Pollution Control Agency practices would be used. Franzen noted that this was a small project and the construction time would be short. • 2 • Schlampp stated that there were erosion problems currently in this area and the hay bails would definitely not handle the erosion problem. Kardell noted that the Staff recommendation required that a satisfactory erosion control plan be • submitted to Staff. Franzen stated that two issues needed to be clarified; the existence of an easement for access to Kottke property and Outlot A maintenance. Clinton asked if a time frame had been established for these items to be resolved. Franzen replied prior to City Council review the items should be taken care of. Rob Kay, 9172 Victoria Drive, asked what the time frame was for the project to begin. Krueger replied the project would begin in the spring of this year if approved. Kay asked if there would be grading on his property. Krueger replied that the street had been left unfinished and the proponent would need to meet with Kay to discuss grading on his property. Kay stated that he had an irrigation system installed which needed to be addressed. Franzen replied that when grading occurred on adjoining property the developers agreement would stipulate that the proponent be required to provide grading which meet with property owners approval. Clinton recommended that clarifying language be used regarding erosion control methods. He added that because of the topography in this area there was a potential for an erosion problem. Erosion control should be more than the normal methods used to insure proper control. MOTION 1: Kardell moved, seconded by Clish to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Kardell moved, seconded by Clish to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Leland Kottke for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.76 acres based on plans dated March 12, 1993, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993 with the addition that the City Engineer require the most stringent erosion control methods to preserve the slope. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3: Kardell moved, seconded by Clish to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Leland Kottke for Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres based on plans dated March 12, 1993, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993 with the addition that the City Engineer require the most stringent erosion control methods to preserve the slope. Motion carried 6-0-0. Schlampp requested that Staff return to the Planning Commission with a report on the erosion control methods to be used on this project. • 4 ( C STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission • THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning FROM: Donald R. Uram, Planner DATE: March 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Kingston Ridge 2nd Addition APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Leland Kottke LOCATION: South of Victoria Drive, West of Staring Lake Parkway REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.76 acres 2. Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into 6 single family lots and road right-of-way • 41110 o INII, , . .. ......- •;:. -: , _4., \ • 4...44'. • st1T,:•'.I10. t \ PUB ('..1 - / -(- A . • .,..4.77.1% : - -- -;••••..4, --.%.0.%,.t. .4, •••': PU ,..,.,, ,, _:, ....i..:.R.-.a. .* •-' .. ,',-•..04-1,',•-- ....-..,...... ',..:BD I., 1' ., • (.71:Z'7i. 'r:.4Z' :••:,‘ ... '4 ."4-A, - :•.•:•:•::::::. , . .. . ITi. ••fe ;•, : ,.,..4,. •,X4-4-.45:- 1 1.111.V •"-A. . •::';41.'!... a , -1nr /'..:itl.',`",,c-•* or,.41,-; fki--.N.•.' --. ,,,T,',w4-"‘.!,5-: /...-.413k& 0-41 tell f.-i•e; 4,.• •::,-.. ..,..-,› • It!' -i, ::ly - . • un- .- ''- 'Is R M-2.5 ;..:59lAr --,-ckt • - ..-,:.1--1...-.„-.,,-,,„ - *" - Illggi.. .11I '"'"tillIA11111 ...liAc0 - i ;17 -‘.,<.4s" - •t%. : -';: . -,'....!„ ,,t7.---,..,::-1,- .$•-, •••........mop ...it Emor NG g :„.., v:0.4)4. / ,•,., .4,,c•,>. . :,,,i s ' ' -* /' .' ••=.4•4r; . - •,.... V.-antaw •,;4"...r.s-.4:- .;,..'• i.,.!•'..•• .:,, ,%B. . •at ;:i..:47,;:m,4 .... 4,.. $ ,.. , _ T.", ....,......,..... ,.. ..,...,,, ,ve.......... .mgrAir . -:TVF-61- N-COM / - -4-qii•stoi. .:.:-.i.:01 :-.-' .. , • . , , Ilk • :44t 41/ 4. IPISill / 1 E@ gi fir Fri i , LA' l WAY i ' . . •.' 111. Q 11 1 I I I 9...q.A1./ • ,.. • , .... .. . . • --14._ ,, t • K.A‘41.4k- Q%:t.4';, ii`. :1: --. 4 in, - .... .. . ..... 1,;,. • r... 4.•:4-7 . :.,,..T,.....4 'If, \ :- cif': .--" -; - "' MO —. N.-' , • r . - - - _ r--- ... . i: I11 7* \,, ...V - \ N." W., ... I I ! ) 1....,". • ....i.f•'::':i:•:;1::!i::.!fr.;!. • 10,ik, . !i , 7 • -• :;!!:!:::•:i:::.1!::. 4 • tj-N„..,41-7,0.0 . ,:an •'!..*::::•::':•.::: ' -•' !_ a _ . .1 .:•i,i: 464. Tie‘4PF- ' ,< ., f T . , ' 'E,'„R.DCi• • _.,;7.--,...- :.-•-.....•ul 1 . -sr-,,' --"IN .. ... ••. -; . ,.i t-IL. • ‘-.1...,, 1 . T CI,--• .--a3A -Cr' ....,00......\ \ i-a.),5, -- - - - ,' .—..! ..,- ' -!-. , 1 e, 4 1. .. r_fc \, .-ioto 0,ii /- . -• M-2.5 . 4 lik _ '..:' ...•.. ,J, , - ...- 46PA lilt :' 4‘.....---. (- ..-4::_-14'.- -:. /414 ..YV.-mg.-.:e!'-;• - I c-,-. ..ii 00 1: Oa - </A ,•••.:. ; .._...k' ..,1 ., . iii • —,-,;:.:::::•:,!•-•-, .i. OAK POMIT :,i!!'• .!• \,s...:::',t7;:::g•F •..:„.., . if a.00 LI 0111 I '....4''''.?..*". - ,-;••.:. NYE ftwEDIAT E •• "-"%:*li,':17::: Th4- '! j,44- • „.• el 0 ‘• ,5(3-13 ..... .i.,. )- „,, __N i'' soloot.. - . x '•• wr—I-O '',..'r ' / • , •.. \ . ,...-•••• \sT=A5s: / ' <•, *cap/ c 1,.. .....),\,' i.„...I.; I.", s) \\ :. • R M-65 I) .41!111 , .,...„th:., ::,••:::• ....,4,,.....,.., ••... 7.,:p.4.n.1„ -.,....,4„:e&i„:1:: . ,,,.. .. -.-it.,...• $,I,,:..:i:i::.:1.:::.-2z-:•:.•:•. • .:- ,': ,s.•.*.÷-1,4.1.3r:i. 't .., ,:-.; .,-, ::. 7: ::. - .:..,-.71.,!.7).;,:', ::.•,1?. •:•••,44.1i- q.....: .. •:,.. •...• ;. ...!I1A ,..•• . I ' m '' V- 3t u REY.; • .! •.• 17-71.,:.:7.,.a:fo..;,i7t. •.-itili,is. .g.,,„, 4,._•.,.1: :„.m...-:f.! 1,...„... -1. •,•4 •------ •;.• fr..tf \ ::"....e.illiggi; :Ili: ,,Yii!it.iii, !•'...• '.'•:41 ••::!*.,; .;,6,... .% .4. .... ,,,, •,.:A.,•: •....,.,.. ! 1.,:i_it,1:44til'; ',...l.t. .,i:.,:l.:':;.‘• ''II:t11"1441.4-:•• •'7`,II1'....-..., . 2.',1''''.1...4t.if:4 "..2.. ki0i..i...-‘1.si.. i '..'I!,1...-:1,:i ..ii!li;,;:.!,T•:-...ti'cl,...-1•1;i•ti:.;'":!'-'''.'f't„.. :ii.- 4:1•'.1i.....''::;,.;1'...."-•:"'.,'-4...aiii., 12 ; ..... )14P4PP : 11711N-0-0.7, lv,.;s9F.,.': l'1,,:,)*,:i '•:-:::%•,.:•...-',' .' 41% •:',. ,:ii:-.,."'!ii:fti+tgl,A, :ttii,'i:k.;-1;`,.:. ::' i _,,,,. ,,, ),..: ..14...,_:-.;1 ft,..,..:,..:,:..!I , . ... • ....,i,. :•:::::!:,• •It..7.ii.,•• g 1/2:,:4•••• ri...4.• 2.... , . .. , ..A. c''... - 1.,3s.--.-111:; iZ:,11 ::.;17: i4f 14.Anitii,-.-..ti,-, •!74.7 . '-e.,T Eti!' 7r•re. 7... ; At ?4(7441PPA -- \ •,, .• 4''''':,;'.t I.41..:;i;;';'1.;.:II4 . l'iii11.;:r.e.14iii.ar .,::..311::ii..' . ‘,14.7•".4!'ili •.,41, i . .:,......„.,-.-•.:1:::t,•'.......'-•"•.:.-',:46'441'....;i:i itit' 1-•.. •-', tV,..1.4:',if, ..,:.:!•;. ;.... .:.......d.,-1.10. -..,,.$J..tr, ,...„;.3:1 ,;•••06 .:1; ,t,..)!, „pt.,,,,.,2.i.,. . 7c..;'''.:7,,::''lii:',. .4:1'41.411.,:......••,. ,..i.,4iliEji;,i,!ii.; ;.1„:-..•,q,': :11t1.. ?,!;;•• ,:ots '' 141 1 _ .... ,..:.. :::-•.:::;,...,,..,...:144......„....,,,,,,,,.4.,....,„„......, .. . ,.:,4•1• •::: :•,.. ... ,\,. .. ,sl!'-•-.1:-.•;:.;: .--,:fi..:40:-F-••••-•=i:a.,....1.-4•,„?..,-...:i,.-4.1....-4..av-,-,:,,,i77:15r-;:i:.',r,,,,,,-..-=';A-Re. ..,-•,'',..:---.,.%.::. ,:*--'..- ,,, --. :::„....:. ,-__,,:ni.:4.5..,.....„.„.„.„,„,,.,„.• ..„,..„2„:„..tif.u.::::. • t. •„,. ..,..,.! . - - •,.: ,.•;-...:,:-..,.s:-.:,..,i,e, •,-,....,- . •;.,.:-.,,,... .:,44,...,..,..„1.,::. -,...: .' .. -,:, :,.: ,, . . .. . ...ilv.:...,„-,...,:,;,..v.,,,,::....1.-0,..,• „,,.,..„..7, .:.. - ;,-.-. -- ,':,-,c....2i.,,..,-•:, ;,; „..p.:•?:.;!.7e.v.e....,,,..., ,;;....2 s• ••.- . ..1.- - v - .4.:.!... .„i.,.,16i:.„,!.....,;... . .,-, • -. :, ..r..;-:-.-,.:1,-Ai,:p2,4..:.-iE:,;?!li,:e.i,-0.i,-.,,N..i•kli.:4-,..„,•47,,. .•,j • c ss, .'"•`:.---:;lig,,..i:i.,iiiii.,,f1 :-. ;,,,i,-.,..,i*i.,.. .-( I .. -,.., -,.• . r _ . _ v k,., PUB • •.-43...kt N'----- • !.. - - • To'A ,. . ,. .,. FLYING C L aml.v.,..,.., .......,.-.........,, I OUD ,01111ti-2 PUB 0 -..„ri 10 AIR PORT PUBy Ala 1 LOCATION MAP J -H' Sc 1 i FLYING CLOUD . C C Staff Report 411 Kingston Ridge 2nd Addition March 19, 1993 BACKGROUND This site is designated on the Eden Prairie Comprehensive Guide Plan for development as a low density residential land use. The adjacent properties to the north and west are also guided for low density residential. The property to the east adjacent to Staring Lake is guided for public open space. Specific land uses in this area include large lot, single family development to the west and the Kingston Ridge Addition, zoned R1-13.5 to the north. The proponent is requesting a zoning district change from Rural to R1-13.5 and a preliminary plat of approximately 2.76 acres into 6 single family lots and road right-of-way. SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT This site will be subdivided into six single family lots and road right-of-way. Lot sizes within the subdivision range from a maximum of 27,011 square feet to a minimum of 14,165 square feet. The average lot size is 15,905 square feet. All of the lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district. When the Kingston Ridge Addition was approved, Outlot A, was subdivided and is proposed to be given to Leland Kottke, the existing homeowner, in order to provide an adequate side yard setback. Outlot A will be given to Leland Kottke with the development of this proposal. Access to this site will be provided by the extension of Victoria Drive from its current terminus along the south property line. Victoria Drive will end in a cul-de-sac on this property. The plans indicate that the driveway to the existing house is partially on the City's property to the south. The City has no record of any easement that allows this. With the development of this property, the proponent must either provide proof that an easement exists or receive an easement from the City for this to continue to occur. GRADING Elevations on the site range from a high point of 896 located in the middle of the site to a low point of 860 next to Staring Lake Parkway along the east property line. The site slopes in all directions. Approximately 6 feet of cut will be required for the construction of the extension of Victoria Drive. In order to construct Victoria Drive, off-site grading is required. The developer is required to get permission from the adjacent property owners to allow for any off-site grading to occur. All of the homes are designed as walkouts with minimal grading required for construction. Because of the sandy soils in the area, erosion control and restoration plans are critical for this project site. 2 • C C Staff Report • Kingston Ridge 2nd Addition March 19, 1993 There is an existing stand of evergreen trees located in the middle of property. With the extension of Victoria Drive, all of these trees will be removed. The City Forester has examined these trees and has stated that they were planted as a windbreak and are of marginal quality. The tree preservation was to protect significant natural site features. Because these trees were planted as a windbreak and are of marginal quality, tree replacement is not required. UTILITIES Utility service is available to this project by the extension of a 6 inch water line and an 8 inch sanitary sewer line located within Victoria Drive. These utilities will be extended to the end of Victoria Drive to serve the proposed homes. Storm water runoff will be collected within the street and discharged into an existing catch basin system located in Victoria Drive. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS There is an existing 5 foot concrete sidewalk located along the east side of Victoria Drive. With • the development of this proposal, the proposed sidewalk will be extended approximately 35 feet and terminated at the property line. A sidewalk extension into Victoria Drive is not required because it is a cul-de-sac. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the request for a rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.76 acres and preliminary plat of 2.76 acres into 6 single family lots and road right-of-way based on revised plans dated March 12, 1993 and subject to the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, proponent shall: A. Provide documentation that Outlot A, Kingston Ridge Addition has been deeded to the existing homeowner. B. Provide documentation indicating an easement for the off-site driveway to the existing home or negotiate a new easement. a Staff Report Kingston Ridge 2nd Addition • March 19, 1993 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed stormwater runoff and erosion control plans for review and approval by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed stormwater runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District at least 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Stake the construction limits with erosion control fencing. C. Submit documentation indicating permission for off-site grading on the adjacent properties. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall pay the appropriate cash park fee. 4 BEARPATH PHASE 2 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BEARPATH PHASE 2 FOR SIENNA CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Bearpath Phase 2 for Sienna Corporation dated April 16, 1993, consisting of 419 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of May, 1993. • Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 71S 1 Exhibit A • Bearpath LEGAL pESCRIPTION • • That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section together with: •?,,Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, Henn southa[ly of the following described line and its easterly and The south 14.88 acres of the east 35 acres of the west Half of westerly extensions: County, Minnesota. ?p Commencing at the northwest corner of said North Half of together with: the Northwest Quarter: thence on an assumed bearing of .!..,,. . South 1 degree 13 minutes 34 seconds West, along the west :yhe South Half of the Northeast line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, a Quarter eofn the Northeast Quarternneso distance of 488.41 feet to the point of beginning of the ftSectlon 19, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Mlnnesoc • line to be described: thence North 80 degrees 36 minutes together with: 34 seconds East, a distance of 2353.77 feet to the north :r'E`: . line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter: thence g Thv'Soucheasc Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1?, South 87 degrees 25 minutes 04 seconds Fast along said �ownshlp 116, Range 22, Hehe N r County, Minnesota. ctio?T that north line a distance of 174.03 feet to the northeast pazt;thereof lying within the ri y corner of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter and ght of wa for the Minneapolis s there terminating. t`i+cl.ouia Railway Company. together with: together with: That part of Government Lot 1 of said Section 19, lying north of All that part of North Ralf of the Southeast Quarter of Sectic the public highway running through said Lot 1. 19, Township 116. Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, descri as follows: Commencing at a point 1856 feet due North from tt Together with an easement for right of way from said public road Southeast corner of said Section 19, to the point of beginninc ;e Lake Riley over the easterly 20 feet of that part of said Lot 1 thence running due Westerly 1918 feet more or less to the east south of the road, according to the Government survey thereof. right of way line of the Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway Company; thence southwesterly along said easterly line of saic _:;ether with: right of way 740 feet more or less to the south line of the NE Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 19: thence due '. The west 45 acres of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 250 feet more or less to the westerly line of the east 23.8 ac 1'i, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Sect thence due North 1320 feet more or less to the north line of ; together with: Southeast Quarter; thence due East 2105.4 feet more or less tc Northeast corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence due South Mat part of the west 16.2 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the feet more or leas to the point of beginning, EXCEPT that part Southeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin thereof lying within the right of way for the Minneapolis and .o•inty, Minnesota, lying north of the following described line: Saint Louis Railway Company. 1eginning at the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the ;citheast Quarter of said Section 19: thence on an assumed bearing together with: of 'forth 0 degrees 26 minutes 29 seconds West, a distance of .32.67 feet along the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19. Towns Southeast Quarter to the point of beginning of the line to be Range 22. Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow : aescribed; thence South 89 degrees 50 minutes 12 seconds East, a Commencing at the southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of :1:tance of 605.22 feet, more or less, to the east line of said said Section 19; thence north along the easterly line of said west 16.2 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section a distance of 1856 feet; thence west parallel with the and said line there terminating. southerly line of said Section 19 to the east line of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway right-of-way; thence together with: southwesterly along said east line of said right of way to the north line of Government Lot 3; thence east along said north 1 ;overnment Lot 2, Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin said Government Lot 3 to the northeast corner of said lot; 'County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part thereof lying within the plat thence south along the east line of said Government Lot 3 to t of Auditor's Subdivision Number 372, said Hennepin County, and south line of said Section 19; thence east along said south li .:(CEPT that part thereof lying southerly of the following of .said Section to the point of beginning; except that part of cescribed line: Beginning at the southeast corner of the north Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section lyi li 57.5 feet of the south 280.00 feet of said Government Lot 2: south of County Road No. 1, and except that part of the west 6 thence on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 26 minutes 29 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said seconds west, a distance of 830.06 feet along the east line of Section lying south of a line drawn at a right angle to the we said Government Lot 2: thence South 71 degrees 14 minutes 30 line of said Quarter-Quarter from a point therein distant 805. seconds West, a distance of 632.36 feet; thence South 51 degrees feet north of the northerly line of County Road No. 1. 18 minutes 43 seconds West, a distance of 103.00 feet, more or less, to the shoreline of Lake Riley and there terminating. together with: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of together with: Section 19, Township 116, Range 22. Hennepin County, Minnesota That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, described as follows: That part of the west 600 feet of the Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as Southeast Quarter nofe the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, Towr follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said West Half of 116. Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of a 11 the Northeast Quarter: thence South on the quarter-quarter line a drawn at a right angle to the west line of said of the norther! ciatanev of 92 rods: thence West a distance of 35 rods: thence from a point therein distant 805.23 feet north the norther.' North a distance of 92 rods to the Section line; thence East a fin+ of County Road No. 1 and north of the center line of saic distance of 35 rods to the point of beginning, lying southerly of roan. the following described line and its easterly extension: together with: Beginning at the northwest corner of said West half of That part of the east 200 feet of Government Lot 3, Section 1 the Northeast Quarter: thence on an assumed bearing of Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin South 86 degrees 39 minutes 39 seconds East, along the the north 584 feet thereof and County, Minnesota, lying soul north line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter, a County Road 1. Yinq north of the center line distance of 966.64 feet; thence South 72 degrees 30 • • minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North 85 degrees 40 minutes 25 seconds East, a1110 distance of 65.01 feet to the east line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter and there terminating. Exhibit A Page 2 •ogther with: That part of Government Lot 3, Section 19, Township 116, Range•22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot 3: thence south to the southeast. corner of said Lot; thence west to the center line of the County' " Road; thence northerly along said center line of said road to its ; intersection with the southerly line of the right of way of thee;; ' Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad; thence northeasterly along' said right of way to the north line of said Lot 3; thence east to; beginning; EXCEPT that part in County Road No. 1; and EXCEPT that part described as follows: Commencing at a point on the south' .. line of said Government Lot 3, 210 feet west of the southeast' corner thereof; thence North 4 degrees 20 minutes West 183 feet to the center line of County Road No. 1: thence South 83 degrees 02 minutes West along said center line 199.5 feet; thence South 41 degrees 13 minutes East 211.6 feet to the south line of said Government Lot 3; thence east 72.5 feet to the place of beginning; and EXCEPT that part of the east 200 feet thereof lying south of the north 584 feet and lying north of the center line of County j Road No. 1; and EXCEPT that part beginning at the southeast corner of Government Lot 3; thence west along the south line of said Government Lot 3 a distance of 210.00 feet; thence North 4 degrees 20 minutes West a distance of 183.0 feet to the center line of County State Aid Highway No. 1, thence easterly along the center line of said County State Aid Highway No. 1 to the east line of said Government Lot 3; thence south along the east line of said • Government Lot 3 to the point of beginning. together with: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying west of the east 23.8 acres and lying east of the east line of the west 16.2 acres. (An action to determine ownership of this area is pending in district court, notice of Lis Pendens - Doc. No. 5733305.) BEARPATH PHASE 2 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF BEARPATH PHASE 2 FOR SIENNA CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Bearpath Phase 2 PUD Concept by Sienna Corporation and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 20, 1993; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: • 1. Bearpath Phase 2 bySienna Corporation, beingin Hennepin County, Minnesota, rP � P legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated April 16, 1993. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated March 19, 1993. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of May, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk U ( U BEARPATH PHASE 2 • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Bearpath Phase 2 for Sienna Corporation requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 235 acres located at East of Riley Lake, north of Pioneer Trail from Low Density Residential.to Quasi-Public. • ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th of May, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • 04 / 15 /93 06 : 17 SUE FORESTER 6125447273 p . 001 UNAPPROVED MINUTES • PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday, April 5, 1993 7 :30 p.m. , City Hall 7600 Executive Drive COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Richard, Chair; Bruce Bowman, Richard Brown, Claire Hilgeman, Joanne Kube-Harderwijk, Diane Popovich Lynch, Thomas Marcus COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Adam Harju, David Kracum COMMITTEE STAFF: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:34 p.m. by Chair, Pat Richard. ( II . APPROVAL OF AGENDA41111 No changes . III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 15, 1993 Hilgeman noted that at paragraph 1 on page 10, it should read that Suburban Chevrolet had 700 square feet of signs compared to Ford's 60 square feet. MOTION: Kube-Harderwijk moved to approve the minutes of the March 15, 1993, meeting as amended. Motion seconded by Bowman. Motion passed 6-0. IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Bearpath Rick Packer of the Sienna Corporation commented that Cross's memorandum of April 1, 1993, is essentially complete. He indicated that they had received approval for 420 units and that number has been reduced to 299 due to market and environmental conditions. The only thing the Commission members hadn't received with their packet was a concept plan for the clubhouse. Packer indicated there would be a 31 ( percent tree loss which includes the clubhouse area. H stated the original plan was for a one-story design, whit is more efficient, but they wanted the clubhouse to have ?Bo 04 / 15 /93 06 : 17 SUE FORESTER 6125447278 p . 002 Unapproved Minutes (7 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, April 5, 1993 more presence on the site and have redesigned it as a two- story, which reduces the building pad size. He indicated the only other issue left to resolve is the location of the maintenance building. It is currently anticipated that the building will be along the LRT corridor across from the park. 1 Packer indicated that hole No. 8 had been moved to the wetland to mitigate tree loss, and that there will be enough parking for the 20 or so year-round employees. In response to Brown's question regarding moving hole No. 8 to the wetland, Packer stated that there would be less tree loss by moving it, that the wetlands have basically been separated by farm roads, that none of them function the way they used to, and that it is sometimes possible to walk across the wetlands in the summer. They will be restoring a small wetland, tripling its size, and it will actually • become a type 3 or type 4 wetland and hold water. He also indicated that water discharged into the wetland would be treated. Richard noted his concern about the appearance of the maintenance shed, and indicated that he wanted to be assured that the building would not become an albatross that could be seen from the city park. Cross indicated that they would be reviewing a detailed site plan, and Packer stated that he would be coming back for finishing details. Packer noted that the building will be set on a hill, higher than the road, and will be set back with trees screening it and separating it from the tee on the 18th hole. Packer commented that they also wanted a separation between the golf course and the maintenance area, especially visually. Brown asked what assurance the city would have that the wetlands would be improved, and if it is a good deal for the City. Cross noted that degraded wetlands in another park area had been used for an NURP pond, and Packer stated that none of the wetlands to be filled in are DNR regulated. Cross indicated that all permits had been applied for and all regulations would be followed. Richard commented that there seemed to be many holes where there are no trees and he felt golf courses with more trees are more appealing. Packer indicated that there will be 1.6 million dollars worth of tree replacement on the golf • course and Cross stated that 28, 364 caliper inches of trees 2 77) I 04 / 15 /93 06 : 17 SUE FORESTER 6125447273 p . 003 ,) Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, April 5, 1993 need to be replaced. Packer noted that many holes are alongside the woods. Trees would be replaced to protect the roadside, but not along the house sides of the golf course because people who build or buy there are paying for the view of the golf course. Packer commented that there would be enough water on the course that no one is going to care about the trees. Lynch noted that there is a lot of concern about the impact on wildlife and asked what would be done in that regard because of the sculptured lawns. Packer stated that they would be leaving a 25 foot vegetated buffer along the water to discourage geese, but that other than that, there really isn't anything that can be done because geese come to landscaped areas. Cross commented that at Round Lake, there is vegetation around the lake with the exception of the beach and courts area, and that the geese come to those areas. Packer noted that it is rare to golf and not see geese. In response to Brown's comment that the proposal indicates 226 single units and 95 multiple units, Packer stated that there would be 299 total units. Hilgeman asked, with regard to the shoreland ordinance, about the reference in the March 19, 1993, memorandum from Michael Franzen to change lots 9 and 10, block 7 . Packer responded that they will move the lot lines to meet the ordinance. Cross commented that the timing of the construction of Riley Lake Road is critical to this project because in order to build the park, the existing roadway will need to be closed, and cars will need to use the realigned road. She indicated that the developers stated the road could be passable by June of 1994; at the least, rocked and ready for traffic. Hilgeman asked for clarification regarding the request to rezone Block 17-19 to R1-95. Packer indicated that it had been approved with lot waivers. Brown asked if the MPC considers yard chemicals when they figure run off, and Cross confirmed that they do go into all of that and that the EAW with this project has a whole chapter on runoff. Packer commented that fertilizers used in yards only attach to rocks and such, so the runoff is from the streets, sidewalks and crossings that the chemicals attach themselves to, and stated that runoff from all hard surface areas are put into sedimentation bases and yards 3 04 / 15 /93 06 : 17 SUE FORESTER 6125447273 p . 004 41/1 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, April 5, 1993 will have individual drains. Cross also indicated that the golf course and park will be using low phosphorous fertilizers except in spring for germination. • 410 (ft • (I 04 / 15 /93 06 : 17 SUE FORESTER 6125447273 p . 005 (I Unapproved Minutes • Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, April 5, 1993 MOTIONt Brown moved to recommend approval of the Bearpath Phase 2 project per Staff recommendations. Motion seconded by Hilgeman, and passed 6-0. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Recommendation to Hire Consultant to Evaluate Community Center Natatorium Cross explained that they had received four replies to the Request for Proposal, ranging from $2,500 to $6,000, and that they are considering recommending the Lundquist, Willmar, Potvin and Bender, Inc. bid after evaluating the cost and because Lundquist, Willmar, Potvin and Bender, Inc. has experience with Eden Prairie's system. Hilgeman commented that she thought we had a grasp of what was wrong with the system at the previous meeting and that Johnson Controls had already. sent a letter to Dave Black reviewing the options and- costs. Hilgeman asked if we were proposing to hire a company, at a cos of $10,000, to do what we have already ascertained. Cross explained that we don't know the technical aspects of the situation, that the engineer would be doing a detailed study, and that previously someone had just made a guess as to the problem based on a telephone call. Richard noted that hiring a consultant would be the way to get an exact answer to the problem. MOTION: Lynch moved to recommend authorizing a contract with Lundquist, Willmar, Potvin and Bender, Inc. Motion was seconded by Kube-Harderwijk, and passed 6-0 . Hilgeman asked what the percentage meant on the bid relating to design and construction documents and construction observation and if the study could cost more than $10,000. Cross explained that it would be a percentage of the cost of the entire project. B. Trapping Ordinance Committee Cross explained that this was an information item an 5 MEIN lk not LOMM.Sl.OV� 3-zz3 C. BEARPATH PHASE 2 by Sienna Corporation. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Quasi-Public on 235 acres, PUD Concept Review on 419.5 acres, PUD District Review on 419.5 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 112.8 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 19.8 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 on 9.2 acres and Preliminary Plat of 419 acres into 226 single family lots and 95 multi-family lots. Location: Fast of Riley Lake, north of Pioneer Trail. Rick Packer, representing the proponent, reported that the number of units had been changed to 234 single family units and 65 multiple family units. Packer questioned the reasoning to change the zoning to R1-13.5, but the proponent did not have a problem with doing so. Packer stated that 1.4 acres of wetland would be filled in. In addition the remaining wetlands would be redeveloped. Packer noted that the wetlands had been degraded over the years and the Grade 3 wetland would be revegetated. The Grade 2 wetlands would be expanded and reconnected to the Grade 3 wetlands. The wetlands would be connected so that all the wetlands would function as one wetland area. Packer stated that the lots would be a minimum of 10,500 square feet. The lots would be approximately 70 feet wide with building pads of 55'x 85'. Rather than 5 foot and 10 foot setbacks the proponent recommended 7.5 and 7.5 setbacks to guarantee a minimum of 15 feet between the homes. Packer stated that a traffic study had been conducted for the north entrance, but was labeled incorrectly. Adequate stacking distance has been provided. Schlampp asked who would maintain dead-end at Bearpath North (Street I). Packer replied that if the streets were taken over by the City the City would maintain the cul-de-sac and the drive would be maintained by the owners. A common ownership of the drive would be through • easements for the three landowners and it would not be maintained by Homeowners Association. Schlampp believed that ownership should be noted. Packer noted that the Club House was a concept approval only. The proponent was having difficulty fording an appropriate place for the maintenance building. At this time the maintenance building would be located across from Riley Park; however, the final location was still being looked at. The building in the present location would be screened from both the park and the golf course. Packer questioned the need to have a sidewalk constructed on both sides of Riley Lake Road. He added that Riley Lake Road had been redesigned so that it would not be a main collector road. Packer stated that the proponent would like to continue to work with Staff regarding conservancy easement. A grading plan had been submitted. Packer presented the concept plan for the Club House. Packer stated that the proponent had revised the plan to save the masses of trees. The tennis courts would be developed out of the tree area. The club house was proposed as a two story building. The first floor would be restaurants and kitchens and the second floor would handle all of the golf functions. Sandstad asked if a conservancy easement was recommended for the Riley Creek one site for 10 Lots 13 and 14 as an archeological site. Franzen replied that a field survey would be needed. Packer replied that all conservancy easements would be shown by meets and bounds and legal descriptions and would not show on the actual plat. Schlampp asked if the Light Rail Transit lane would be a public access and if it would b. protected by trees. Packer replied yes. Schlampp stated that holes 5, 6, 7 and 8 would fall into the LRT lane and questioned who would be liable if someone was hit by a ball. Packer replied that it would be a concern until the final plan was drafted. Packer added that there was a grade difference. Packer added that the proponent had tried to orient the tee blocks to minimize the problem. Schlampp stated that hole 8 would be wide open. Schlampp stated that some of the wetlands were actually bodies of water and questioned if they would be deeded to the City. Packer replied that the lots would be platted to within 25 feet of the wetland. Packer added that the association would maintain the 25 feet between the homes and the wetland areas. Schlampp noted that the location of the N.U.R.P. ponds were not shown on the map and questioned how the ponds would be maintained because dredging could not take place within a wetland area. Packer replied that the N.U.R.P. ponds would need to be maintained not the wetlands. Packer added that the water would actually be cleaner than what is there today with the addition of the N.U.R.P. ponds. Packer stated that no area in the golf course would drain into the wetlands. Schlampp asked what would happen when all of the wetlands were at the same level. Packer replied that all of the wetland areas were essentially at the same level now, the proponent was proposing to reconnect the wetlands. Schlampp noted that Riley Creek was navigable and no tree protection was provided for this area. Schlampp asked if a storm drainage plan would be presented for the N.U.R.P. ponds. Franzen asked what Schlampp wanted to see. Schlampp replied that the locations should be noted on the plans. Packer showed Schlampp the locations on the plans. Packer added that the proponent hall) placed them on the plan to make sure there was enough room for N.U.R.P. ponds. Sandstad asked how close the fence would be to the corridor. Packer replied that he did not know at this time; however, the proponent did not want to put a fence in the wetland areas. Wissner asked how the proponent had been able to sell lots if the exact location of the lots was not know. Packer replied that what the people were buying was a reservation for a lot and the lots were on a first come - first serve basis. Franzen reported that the main issues were R1-9.5 zoning, the entrance design, traffic,and storm drainage. Franzen stated that a consultant looked at the design for the gate entrance. Staff did not want cars backing onto Dell Road and, therefore, a proper stacking distance would need to be provided. The north entrance was more of a concern than the south entrance. Franzen stated that two lanes would make sense for the north entrance. Franzen said that R1-9.5 zoning was originally developed to provide starter homes and questioned if the Planning Commission wanted to allow large houses on small lots. Franzen noted that R1-13.5 zoning would require specific criteria. Franzen stated that the number of units was not the issue. A valid reason would be needed for a waiver. Schlampp stated that he had seen golf courses developments in Florida which had large homes on small lots. • Kardell asked for clarification on the storm drainage issue. The wetland mitigation plan shows 27 N.U.R.P. ponds. Franzen believed that the proponent followed the concept plan well. The road system remained the same as the original concept plan. The question is how does the plan meet with City ordinance requirements. Franzen stated that originally a 60" pipe had been • discussed to handle storm water. The current plan would be for most of the water to stay on the site and the drainage pipe would only be 12". The storm water drainage issue needs to be discussed further with the Engineering Department. Franzen asked Packer what the time frame was to have the gateway and drainage issues resolved. Packer replied that he would not have a problem coming back to the Planning Commission. Packer added that the conceptual entrance design showed that traffic would not back onto Dell Road. Packer believed that both the proponent and Staff had planned ahead so that a time crunch would not become a problem. Packer stated that the storm water drainage plan originally followed the Southwest Study recommendations. He added that the only other solution at this time was to redirect the water into Riley Lake. Packer stated that he wanted both the City engineer and the proponent's engineer to agree that the proposed plan will be a positive solution for both parties. Schlampp believed that the drainage plan was very vague. Packer replied that he would be willing to return to the Planning Commission with detailed plans for the N.U.R.P. ponds. Schlampp asked what would happen to the wetlands. Packer replied that wetlands would have pretreatment and a 25 feet vegetation strip to preserve edge vegetation. Sandstad asked for clarification on sidewalks and taxes. Sandstad asked if the City was requesting sidewalks from Pioneer Trail along Riley Lake Road. Franzen replied that sidewalks were designed to allow residents to get from point A to B. A bike trail would be constructed 411 by the City. East of the creek the developer would be responsible for the sidewalk and West of the creek the City would be responsible for the sidewalk. Sandstad asked how the land other than the house lots was taxed. Franzen replied that he was not sure about taxes but would talk with the City Assessor. Sandstad questioned if the homes were taxed more than the golf course property. Packer replied that he was sure that the golf course would pay some taxes. Sandstad questioned if the number of homes was reduced and the lots sizes reduced if the tax revenue would be less for the City. Franzen replied that property was taxed on location, view, trees, etc. Sandstad asked if it would be an accurate statement that lot size did not affect taxes. Franzen replied that he was not sure and needed to ask the assessor. John Bushey, 9000 Riley Lake Road, believed that the recommendation in the Staff Report to have Riley Lake Road and County Road 1 intersect at right angles was a good idea. Bushey did not believe that the intersection would meet sight line requirements when trying to turn onto Pioneer Trail. Franzen replied that the developer or the City would need to make improvements to meet the design speed for this highway. Franzen added that the County would also review an access entrance permit. Bushey asked if Scenic Heights Road would no longer extend through. Franzen replied yes. Bushey asked if the conservancy easements had been changed from the original agreement in June 1992. Franzen replied that the wetland outlots had been enlarged other areas such as along the creek and historic sites. The easements are recorded so that the owner would know what was required. • 7 I Bushey asked if there was still a plan for a bike trail along Pioneer Trail. Franzen replied that the City policy required a sidewalk on one side and an 8 foot bituminous trail on the other side for collector roads. Franzen added that the Park Department would not leave a gap in the current system. Packer stated that Pioneer Trail was a county road. • Bushey asked for clarification on pedestrian access, which had been discussed at a previous meeting. Packer replied that access for bikes and pedestrians would be through the entrance gate. Bushey asked if access would be allowed from the LRT lane crossing. Packer replied that he had not thought about it at this time; however, something could possibly be worked out for this area. Clinton questioned if a precedent for R1-9.5 zoning would be established with allowing the larger homes on the smaller lots. Clinton did not necessarily believe that the larger lots would solve the problem either. MOTION 1: Clinton moved, seconded by Clish to close the public hearing. Kardell stated that she was not willing to set a precedent for larger expensive homes on small lots. She added that the Planning Commission and City had gone to great lengths to provide affordable housing in the community. Wissner stated that she did not understand why R1-9.5 was being considered when the proponent did not have a problem with R1-13.5 zoning. Clish stated that she was comfortable with allowing P the developer and Staff to further refine thip gate entrance and storm water drainage issues. Clish believed that this project had nothing to do with affordable housing. Schlampp concurred with Clish that affordable housing was not an issue for this project. Kardell believed that the project as proposed would provide large density in a small area. Clinton stated that he was moving toward favoring R1-13.5 zoning. Franzen stated that the number of units in any project was not the issue; it was the impact of the units on the site. Franzen noted that the overall plan was low impact. Franzen added that R1-13.5 zoning would require waivers for street frontage. Sandstad stated that he was not comfortable with R1-9.5 zoning except in the townhouse area. Packer stated that the proponent would go along with R1-13.5 zoning with the necessary waivers. Packer added that the R1-9.5 zoning would provide for more maintenance free housing. Sandstad stated that R1-13.5 zoning could be influenced by tax information being requested. Franzen stated that if this is zoned R1-13.5 an average lot size should be attached to the project of 30,000 square feet and a density of .76 units per acre as a qualifier for over 400 acres an a golf course. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Clinton moved, seconded by Clish to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sienna Corporation for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Quasi-Public on 235 acres based on plans dated March 12, 1993, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3: Clinton moved, seconded by Clish to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sienna Corporation for PUD Concept Review 419.5 acres based on plans dated March 12, 1993, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 4: Clinton moved, seconded by Clish to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sienna Corporation for PUD District Review on 419.5 acres with waivers, Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 122 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 19.8 acres, based on plans dated March 12, 1993, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 5: Clinton moved, seconded by Clish to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Sienna Corporation for Preliminary Plat of 419 acres into 234 single family lots and 65 multi- family lots based on plans dated March 12, 1993, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993. Motion carried 6-0-0. • Za t _ STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: March 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Bearpath Phase II APPLICANT/ • , FEE OWNER: Sienna Corporation LOCATION: North of County Road 1, East of Riley Lake and West of Dell Road REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Quasi-Public on 235 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 419.5 acres. • 3. Planned Unit Development District Review on 419.5 acres. 4. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 112.8 acres. 5. Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 19.8 acres. 6. Rezoning form Rural to R1-9.5 on 9.2 acres. 7. Preliminary Plat of 419 into 226 single family lots and 95 multiple family lots. 1 41Ik (19a U d t .j 4 d U j Lott�i,,A{ t ���,� . ;-:L� 4.8.WILU4 s�IA, L----LI r „ O i/ 51.UI 'IR. UNO LAKE ROADr ? v (((�� / 52.COLL GR. LUT tAT 1 80 GOLB L.T. P .IIESTGATEi • 42 92JCILMER AVE. =•1 1--7 ` � 1t el L� ni'33DONEGAL COVE �--�� '1/���LANE 134,SMAJMROCK 4.7 TB•T N1 -• •• .. 1 �: 1N:, tom" � ��4,, _ M $ & --' ASC4• AO t t • *IN .II • I •. :.•...„„...--, Inillik t"`r • .4• !o < • Q —BISC:AYftF BLVD I.�r:. 132 n CLEA14 L.A.N. . i••r•'. �'�' i BELAIR LANE i T • .•I -I 2 129.DAKOTA QRCLE••••• ice l/ CENTRAL ,.. .....E ,_ . ,.. A. \-0.':? AGE 9 2 ND S T VW CAPRICE LA. OF —� C • RICE MARSH � TT.NECHAS CIR. Q 1 "' `.�+-- LAKE Future 212 oott. --= c• - .1 O • .AKESNOR ••.. R E D c ;— \ Dry. . _ `i . • j3•Z \ ROCK i . . z - 13 Z!.0t.• Y.... \.•-••4 Z • -... .._.......r.-... ...... .-""'"..2-...._-•-•......•-..._ ` O �NgRID(� 1� 12 [� �.`2C �� L A K E • I ►- �\ \�;1J411.itT Oh'. Y �P 121.L1VItVGSTCN LAO?•� 1 �� ........ 122PRESCOTT DR. • o T BEARPATH -. .�\ 1 ^��•`� '��CEDAR LA .•' t^ W �� RIDGE Q - 1 ' Q EL. A O i IRTE GERS RD. �o ,.-� Z .� ,• - LANE . ip 41 L p::.,k7, OC `�"- Park �.. ia Q+7r J .OENVEY COURT - — 117 MC GUFFY ROAD I . I Um........ 118.GATEWAY LANER ks ._ 119 DRESSEN CIRCLE ! I t W .T •:• LAKE VAL VA..EY RD i. RILEY 1 ••®OO 0 !� W • • O • • O •?car . 1127.2B.CRO1 .. ^M� I 0 ( • - 7 :i6N to O . 0 a R22* Cg 262 0 O 29128 0 • • •• W 0 O • C \ . 1 • 0 G d It .p�� \ • LAKELANL TERO 'A 71 '' b• "� I ilk � ( � J I al Y// W 1 Q tt.. , Q Cr rl►1::I a.•. Q 1 ..N.... / 7 o C C Staff Report Bearpath Phase II • March 19, 1993 BACKGROUND When the City reviewed the request for Planned Unit Development Concept and Comprehensive Guide Plan Change last summer, the "General Feasibility" of whether or not a private golf course and controlled access residential community could be an appropriate use on this site was discussed. The City recommended approval of the request for Guide Plan Change of public open space to low density residential and low density residential to medium density residential and a realignment of Dell Road and Riley Lake Road. The Planned Unit Development Process allowed the City to identify general issues and the approach for dealing with them. These issues would be addressed with subsequent rezoning and subdivision phases of the property. In January of 1993, the City approved the first phase of the Bearpath project which depicted 77 lots on 38 acres in the northeast portion of the site. This phase is being replatted due to a change in the location of the access on to Dell Road which has been moved to the north. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVISIONS The road layout, lotting pattern, and golf course follows the general concept plan approved in • August of 1992. There have been some changes in the PUD which staff believes results in a better plan for the City. The first change is the location of the entrance to the project off Dell Road which has been shifted to the North. This eliminates a crossing over the Hennepin Coui?ty Light Rail corridor, and allows for more natural vegetation to be preserved than the previous proposal. The second change is a reduction in the number of total units from 420 to 321. The approved Planned Unit Development Concept contained 260 single family units and 140 multiple family units. The current proposal is for 226 single family units and 95 multiple family units. The reduction in single family homes in the wooded portion of the site allows for more of the wooded character to be retained. The reduction in the number of units in the multiple family portion on the southern part of the property allows for less wetland encroachment. (Attachment A shows the proposed zoning for single family and multi-family.) REZONING TO R1-13.5 A preliminary plat has been submitted for the entire 419 acres. This preliminary plat amends a small portion of Phase I because of the relocation to the entrance road, and a platting of property for the balance of the area beyond Phase I. The lots that are proposed for R1-13.5 zoning are Blocks 1 - 11, and Blocks 20 - 26. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum requirements of the R1-13.5 zoning district with the exception of the requirement for frontage on a public street. With the approval of the PUD Concept, the City approved the use of a private road. As part of the Planned Unit Development District • 41IV Review process, a waiver will be required for lot frontage on a public street for all loss in this proposed subdivision. REZONING TO RM-6.5 There are two areas proposed for RM-6.5 zoning. Blocks 12, 16, and 27 are proposed for 50 twinhome units. These lots meet the dimensional and square footage requirements of the District, but would require street frontage waivers for lots on a private road. Parcel A, off of Bearpath. South cul-de-sac, is proposed for (30-45) townhomes. The use of this site for townhomes is consistent with the original PUD Concept. The developer at this time has not identified a building type, therefore, the zoning approval for this property shall be predicated upon returning to- the Planning Commission and City Council for a site plan review of the grading, drainage, erosion control, building architecture and landscaping details. REZONING TO R1-9.5 Block 17-19 along Street A, are proposed for R1-9.5 zoning. The lots within this area range from 8700 sq. ft. to approximately 13,000 sq. ft. These are proposed for homes at approximately $400,000 per unit. The price of the homes is inconsistent with the intent of the R1-9.5 zoning district which is to provide.for affordable starter housing. In recent years, because of the price of land, it has been difficult to provide for affordable starter housing between $75,000 to $125,000. Therefore, the district has been used to provide for alternative types of housing in the lower price range between $100,000 to $160,000-per unit. Examples of this would be Fairfield and Cedar Ridge. It is the Staffs recommendation that this portion of the site not be zoned for R1-9.5 housing. The Planning Commission has two choices: 1. Recommend that the area be rezoned and replatted for standard size R1-13.5 housing lots. 2. Recommend that the area be zoned R1-13.5 but consider waivers from the City code to allow for the smaller lots. If the Commission chooses the second alternative, care must be taken to identify conditions of approval that would not set a precedent for expensive homes on small lots elsewhere in the community. Reasons for considering the waivers from the R1-13.5 zoning district could be: 1. The density of the Planned Unit Development is .76 units per acre. 2. The smaller lots are located in an open area of the site that does not contain any significant trees. 3 c c 3. The minimum lot size must be 9500 square feet and the minimum street frontage must be 70 feet. The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 5 feet for one side and 10 feet for the other side. 4. The average lot size shall be no less than 11,000 square feet. 5. This small lot area is part of a 419 acre Planned Unit Development with a golf course. SHORELAND ORDINANCE There are two shoreland areas within this development proposal. The first area is any land within 1000 feet of'the highwater mark of Lake Riley. Any lots that are within 150 feet of the highwater mark of the Lake must meet the minimum shoreland lot size requirements. There are no lots within 150 feet of the highwater mark of Lake Riley. The second shoreland area is defined as 300 feet on either side of Riley Creek. Within this area, any lots within 150 feet of the center line of Riley Creek must meet the minimum requirements as follows: 1. 13,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size 2. 120 feet wide at the high water mark • 3. 120 feet wide at the building line 4. 100 foot setback 411i All of the lots within the proposed subdivision meet the minimum requirements of the shoreland ordinance except lots 9 and 10, block 7. Because of the size of the adjoining lots, it is possible to modify the preliminary plat to widen the width dimensions on lots 9 and 10. GRADING AND TREE LOSS The best way to minimize tree loss and grading on the property is to place the correct land uses in the correct location. With the exception of two golf holes, all golf holes are in the open treeless area on the site. Large single family lots between 1/2 acre to 1 acre in size are proposed for the steeply sloped wooded areas in the north portion of the property. The roads are located along the high points and combined with the use of walkout lots minimizes the site grading on the project. The tree inventory indicates a total of 91,065 caliper inches on site. Tree loss is calculated at 31% or 28,364 caliper inches. This compares favorably with the average tree loss for 60 subdivisions approved with tree replacement at 30%. Tree replacement is 11,694 inches which is shown on the tree replacement plan. 4 • C C The majority of the homes are expected to be approximately $500,000. Based upon a survey of building permits in this price range, building pads are approximately 100 feet in width and 80 feet in depth. We do not expect an 8,000 sq. ft. footprint house, however, given the configuration of these homes with garages out in front and decking in back, represents the extent of the graded area. Staff calculated tree loss in the wooded area using this pad size to determine tree loss. STORM DRAINAGE, WATER QUALITY The Engineering Department has reviewed the overall grading and drainage plan for the project and have identified the following items requiring additional work including: 1. Storm sewer connections between many of the ponds are needed. 2. Storm sewer within Dell Road and Lake Riley Road are not shown on the plans. There is no storm sewer outfall to Lake Riley. The solution to this is either a pipe from the wetland east of the 7th tee through the City Park to Lake Riley or a pipe on the southeast side of the rail line to Lake Riley. The route through the City Park might jointly solve park drainage. Regardless of the route the pipe size will be small 12-18 inches because most of the stormwater is retained on site. 3. Provide a drainage area map. 4. Develop a pipe outlot to Riley Lake. 5. The Developer should investigate the possibility of an existing drain tile system that drains the orchard south of Pioneer Trail across this site with an outfall to this project. If a drain tile system is found, provisions should be made for the continued operation of the drain tile. 6. Structure openings for homes shall be a minimum of 2 feet above any high water elevation of surrounding ponds. 7. The developer shall prepare a comprehensive erosion and sediment control plan for this project utilizing Best Management Practices as outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Manual protecting water quality in urban areas. Said plans should address the methods and procedures for protecting adjacent areas and wetlands from sediment impacts during grading operations, phasing plan for grading operation which disturbed areas are minimized and a restoration plan detailing methods used for restoring disturbed areas. yqc C UTILITIES The Engineering Department has reviewed the utility plan and is recommending the following 411 revisions: 1. Provide two 6 inch water services to Riley Lake Park. 2. An additional sanitary sewer and watermain stub should be provided to the north border of the property east of Street D cul-de-sac. 3. Provide sanitary sewer extension to the northeast border of the property at Outlot C at an elevation of approximately 869. 4. Sanitary sewer invert elevation should be revised to 870 at the south end of the project at Pioneer Trail and 868 at Dell Road in future US Homes site. STREETS The Engineering Department has reviewed the overall street plan within the proposal and is recommending the following: 1. The engineers should pursue design alternatives for Dell Road to limit wetland encroachment and potential impacts. The City, developer, DNR, and US Army Corp are jointly working on this. 2. It is anticipated that an additional 17 feet of right-of-way dedication will be required for those areas adjacent to County Road 1. 3. The intersection of Riley Lake Road and County Road 1 should be revised to intersect as nearly as possible to right angles no more than a 5 degree variation. 4. Use Eden Prairie standard design for cul-de-sacs. 5. It is understood that all crest vertical curves meet or exceed a 30 mile per hour design speed for all streets within the project. It is recommended on the major streets, Bearpath north and south that cress vertical curves for these streets be designed to a 35 mile per hour design speed for added safety margin. 6. Provide a traffic study for the entrance to this project from Dell Road showing traffic turning movements and any potential car stacking problems. A traffic study was done for the previous south entrance and the same recommendations will apply to the new north entrance. 6 C C 7. Access for existing homes located near Riley Park must be maintained throughout • the construction of Riley Lake Road. 8. A permit will be necessary from the Hennepin County for proposed grading within County Road 1 and Hennepin County Railroad Authority Right-of-Way. PARKS. TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE The Park and Recreation Staff has recently been discussing with the developer the location of the golf course maintenance building. Because of the tightness of the site plan around the club house and the desirability of preserving vegetation, alternative sites within the project have been explored for the location of the maintenance building. One of these locations is generally on the east side of Riley Park. Park and Recreation staff is concerned about the impact of the proposed maintenance building on the park. The site for the maintenance building should be large enough to provide for screening of the building from the park, and to provide the required parking necessary for maintenance vehicles. Any outdoor storage of the maintenance vehicles must be screened from adjoining roads. Lake Riley Road from Dell Road to Riley Creek must be constructed with the first phase of the project and completed prior to Spring of 1994. The City made the decision last year to delay the improvements to Lake Riley Park because of the impending improvements to Lake Riley Road. As part of Lake Riley Road construction, the developer will be required for the construction of a five-foot wideeast sidesof the road. e concrete sidewalk alongthe north and - As part of the PUD Concept approval, there were several outlots which were required to be dedicated to the City. One outlot is 40 feet wide along the western border of the project which represents a trail corridor. The other outlots are adjacent to Lake Riley on the north side of the Lake. These outlots should be dedicated concurrent with the final platting of the projects. CONSERVANCY EASEMENTS ON RILEY CREEK The steep sloped areas for all lots on Riley Creek should have a conservancy easement over the slopes at a distance starting at 30 feet in back of the houses down to the edge of the lots. ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES There are two additional access points to this project which will be used for emergency vehicle purposes. The Fire Marshal has indicated that there should be a minimum of a 20 foot wide hard surface area in order to support emergency vehicles. The design of any gates, locks, etc. should be coordinated with the Fire Department and the Police Department. 40 7 c EAW STATUS The official comment period for the EAW for outside agencies expired on February4th. Since • that time, the Staff has been meeting with various agencies to go over the comments and provide the additional information requested. The next step is for Staff to prepare a record of findings and a declaration of no significant impact for City Council. This is expected to occur at the City Council meeting of April 20th. The Planning Commission should see this at the April 12th meeting. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL FOR CLUBHOUSE A conceptual site plan has been submitted showing the proposed clubhouse, parking, tennis courts and driving range facilities. (see landscape plan). Since final detailed plans are not available for review, concept approval of the site plan for the clubhouse area should be predicated upon a site plan review by the Planning Commission and City Council. At that time the building architecture, grading and drainage, and utilities will be reviewed in more details. The site plan is detailed enough at this point to evaluate the proposed impacts on the wooded areas. The site plan does a good job of preserving significant tree masses and significant trees. Since the area where the clubhouse and facilities are located is relatively level, we would not expect significant amounts of additional trees to be removed as part of the detailed grading review. ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY _ The archeological survey submitted with the EAW in December identified by cultural resources survey that the Riley Creek One site meets the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places. The Historical Society has indicated that priorities should be given to avoiding development in the immediate area of the site and to provide appropriate controls to assure its protection in the future. Attachment B from the archeological survey indicates the location of the Riley Creek one site. This area on the preliminary plat would be Lots 13 and 14, Block 24. The grading plan indicates that no grading is proposed within the Riley Creek One site. To preserve this area, the Staff would recommend a conservancy area be established across these lots. At the time of building permit issuance the historic area should be located by survey. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN The 100 year flood plain elevation for Riley Creek is at elevation 870. The City requires a minimum of 2 feet above the 100 year flood elevation for structures. The structures along Riley Creek are at a minimum of 10 feet above the flood plain. In addition, there are high water levels established for all wetland areas within the project. Homes must be a minimum of two feet above these water areas. 8 411, c c TRAFFIC If this 419 acre site was developed at the Comprehensive Guide Plan density of 2.5 units per acre, a total of 1050 housing units would be possible. This translates into 10,500 cars per day. The current proposal for 319 units would generate 3,190 daily trips. The Dell Road Entrance study prepared by Barton Ashman & Associates recommends the following changes to the entrance design when it was located south of the rail line. The entrance has been relocated north of the rail line and the same conditions apply. 1. Provide two inbound lanes into the development. 2. Provide a minimum of 150 feet of storage between Dell Road and the entrance gate. 3. Add a southbound right turn lane on Dell Road at the entrance. 4. Provide a left turn and right turn lane for exiting traffic. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO QUASI-PUBLIC Approval of the PUD Concept required that the golf course and wetland areas would be put into a perpetual open space easement to the City. This means that this land area could not be used for any other purposes other than a golf course and wetlands. Currently, the City has a perpetual open space easement on the Olympic Hills Golf Course. All existing golf courses in the community are guided Quasi-Public. The Quasi-Public land use category would be appropriate for the golf course and wetland area on this site. CONCLUSION The preliminary plat and rezoning requests are consistent with the PUD. NURP ponds and PCA Best Management Practices are incorporated into the project to control erosion and improve water quality before discharge to wetlands, Riley Creek and Riley Lake. Traffic is less than what was projected originally in the Comprehensive Guide Plan and the traffic study has recommended minor changes in the entrance design in order for traffic to enter and exit the property with minimal congestion. There are some aspects of the project that require additional information, work, and study. These would include: storm sewer connections between ponding areas, storm sewer within Dell Road and Lake Riley Road, and a storm sewer outfall to Lake Riley. o 9 C C A policy decision identified in the Staff Report is the appropriateness of the R1-9.5 zoning for small lots with expensive homes. The developer has indicated that the intent of the small lots is for a lifestyle choice, not for housing affordability. The Commission could require the developer to subdivide this area into standard R1-13.5 lots, or consider rezoning with waivers based upon a unique set of circumstances which could not be duplicated elsewhere in the community. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff recommends the following alternative courses of action for consideration by the Planning Commission. 1. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, PUD Concept, Preliminary Plat and Rezoning as proposed, then one option would be to recommend approval of the project to the City Council based on plans dated March 19, 1993, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 19, 1993, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall: A. Revise the area proposed for R1-9.5 housing to R1-13.5 standard zoning or R1-13.5 zoning with waivers as identified in the Staff Report. B. Complete the recommended changes as identified in the drainage section in the Staff Report requiring the completion of the storm sewer outfall to Riley Lake. C. Revise the preliminary plat to show conservancy easement areas where identified in the Staff Report along Riley Creek and the Riley Creek archeological site. D. Revise the entrance road design based upon the recommendations of the traffic study. E. Revise the preliminary plat to meet the shoreland ordinance. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, erosion control, utility plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 10 C C 3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: . A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal and review fire protection requirements such as hydrant spacing every 300 feet, and emergency vehicle access design. 4. Planned Unit Development District Review Waivers are granted as follows: A. Use of a private road. B. Lots not fronting on a public street. C. Lot size waivers for Blocks 17-19. 5. The wooded areas shall be staked with a snow fence 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. This shall be inspected by City Staff prior to the issuance of a permit. 6. Rezoning to RM-6.5 (parcel A) multiple family is predicated upon the developer returning to the Planning Commission and City Council for site plan review of this area. The maximum number of units in this area shall not exceed 45 units. 46 , 7. PUD Concept approval is granted for the clubhouse area only. The developer will be required to return to the Planning Commission and City Council for a site plan review of the clubhouse area. II. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the Guide Plan Change and PUD Concept as proposed but would like to see revisions to the R1-9.5 area, the entrance design off Dell Road and completion of storm drainage plan then one option would be to continue the item to the April 12th meeting for additional review. 11 0,o ' • '' it ;� tic 1ti ,v, ..`c�+ b'� �? / .'1 t . '^•..14...1... • ul •�,`" ‘ a: . . — + i : 1 1 r ' ?: Crti 4.1,4's:;,.•r.% r • .. . :S4YGLF • • SLYGL E • • - .Er. • • RESIDEN • . . DENSIT SFD-MIN • SFD AVE •.. PHASING PLAN • • / t:::) _ _ _ R1 y3.5 i —t — 1 S/L/7„>,., . . 2\r„ _... - — fir/ — ' . � . �-f'- - 0 • .:;, - H. 5 . a_- -1 — — c` +`` ti •.K,•-,i_ _--:''-`- -.-- /.; , . • • . . .... , T - • • `PHASE —C. ~ • 1. `� \= J^' \'\ ` • ' 2. . ‘ • R1-9 /' ,rt t _ • . ., • . . , ,,,. ,„ ,.,, „ , 7 _a......:1 . / 4". ,,„ ,' NOTE: N i ! / / ; -' { j• t'�_•..'!:..-:-)-,;z.••::•:•..7;' GOLF COURSE IS •. ALL PHASE I �‘, t . -1:; - I rid ' 2 Rm 6.5 Townhouse H • 011.11° . i . : p �m �6.5 Duple • ;?%4" - lir • Proposed Zoning Attachment A ;.......: on -.. l :. e . , (:7,...-.---ii ___, -............... y Creek I Sits 1. ',. ,..4---.)-) .,% ,,, 4 / rL r ♦, ` ` yaw-• • , .., ,. I ( 1 ,........... No ,, • % ,:.\\ . .\.1.\,- . \ . • ,•-, 1 li• f. : ' : i--... /1 x i• ‘• ak-'7\1n*' ''-W- I I / 1 1 \\..........%:ji MI.7. 1\ ; NINO it 11w •efic, , I.cii - +a Ss _.�. ! 1 • I / L�L •, ' \� ' �•' y gyp•_t4r;�:w,♦�`hr�•.: \ .s ti •& ti •_-••. Ii 1 ‘\\,.:.,..t...,..:!i\ N., g e.'r'/. i w's` 1 " ,4,,1,,6,•' ` -!:'mil:~,: A .�r 1.. \ 1 1 • • 1. \ _ .; --' .P,.............,*.. .•-,I.,.•..“m.11.- ..,.—',nl,.'i°. ,0r ...:-t• / .i c4r:y7l :•_i 1 r ....::::::::.....,?........::.:: l• ::,:•.!;•..".•.,:: :?.;•:"...:::::::::....,':.'.:,::::::::::::::1::::::. 4 0,,.. /I • __ _ ___ ,s i 'OF::0_,...........y• • •,' / t , .i % C.— s• - \ • 4 r L :;a•:•.•.•/'''' fit *ci j. , .::::...F;:;••: ::;�-T.... \"\ y,. K 1 •— • -NI _.„ 1 1 1 1 4ti . i N4,shill .............:.::- ....... .........:: : ::.: : : ::.::.......: : .... ...,:;.4::i.: : : :,,:::...):-........::::-....,...............::::....,:..... -.:.:.:\.;:.:.: -....:: L.:.............................:........T.:,..............:...... ,.. .,.r.•',Pt I.V(.: 1::::.II 'i.1 .::.:.*:;•:*•:\ ••I C.'.:::•.::•::::::::;•......:...............:::e:.....: • '• '*T' :I ..::.:?..... ..•• ..::*••:::::•::•:::::•::::•::::•:.:• :::::...:*: :::.......:...... ...... :%.:...:.....: ::::::::.:..::::::.:::::.:.:•::. :::.:::\.* '.:::::::•:::•:•.•:::::: ::;.:?.::.::::.::.::.*::::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::::::•:::.:*::::-..:::4 :5.':;-........:::::::::::::.:.:7'::. •:.:.:......'..7..7.-.: .7.7......-.:::::.......::::::::::;.:..........:...............s........::.....::.....::.. ....: .....1‘.........:,*...... -......s:00 ii 1.. 1 ....,.:::.....:.:.:.:::::::::.:::::::::::::::.:....;.::..:::::::::::::::::::..::::::::.::::::i::::.:::::::::.:......::::......:.:;:::::::::::::..::::::::::_.:::::./:.: :: .:(..:.:..,:.::.: .::.: . ......::: • ::: T' t. ••••'•'•'• • •::: ....•...•.•.•-..'.... :..''''....... ... ..i%. :*:•:••:••:••::::::::.,.:. /7;':,t4..,: I:::• ... ...9....• .2.....•:::::a:.D.:]:::...a.:::::::**....::::•::.:::•1::.::::::':......::::•:M . a --.. • • •• .. m .......i.,:i...i............... -:-:.:--------. - •'''' ' T ri. : • i :I 0 c C MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission 4111t- Mayor and City Council • THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources FROM: Barbara Penning Cross, Landscape Architect— DATE: April 1, 1993 SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report to March 19, 1993 Planning Staff Report for Bearpath Phase 2 The concept plan for this project was approved last summer. In January Phase 1 was approved for single family housing in the northeast part of the site. Phase 2 is a preliminary plat of the remaining 419 acres with a small replat of the entry road for the first addition. A site plan for the club house and maintenance building will be the only remaining items for approval. Issues for the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission are: SHORELAND ORDINANCE: The proponent has agreed to change lot lines on two lots so that all the lots within the subdivision meet the Shoreland Ordinance. GRADING AND TREE LOSS: Large lots and reduction in the number of homes within the wooded portions of the site, moving the entry road and careful layout of the golf course have kept the tree loss at 31%. This loss is within the average range for subdivisions. Tree calculations were done based on an 80'x100' building pad and could be lower depending on the size and configuration of the house. STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY: This project will be graded utilizing NURP ponding and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's "Best Management Practices." The City has been working with the proponent on a joint plan to take treated storm water through the park to an outlet in Riley Lake. An alignment on the south end of the park works well for drainage and does not impact the mature oak trees. Permits from other agencies will be required and have been applied for. All regulations concerning wetlands will be followed. q oLJ i C C STREETS: • • Dell Road Dell Road will be a four lane road divided with median strips similar to Prairie Center Drive. The parkway concept was discussed several years ago to provide some relief to the broad expanse of roadway. Park, recreation and natural resources staff would encourage and support the use of low maintenance plant materials within this median to further promote the parkway concept. Riley Lake Road Timing of Riley Lake Road construction is critical to the construction of Riley Lake Park. The park has been delayed one year to allow realignment of Riley Lake Road, which was scheduled to be completed in 1993. The new alignment must be passable in order to close the park for construction and remove the existing road as planned. The work schedule for the proponent has been delayed and Riley Lake Road will not be completed in the 1993 construction year. The proponent has stated the road will passable by June 1994, at which time the park construction can start. Every step should be taken by the developer to complete this roadway for park construction to begin in June of 1994. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRAILS: • ._ Staff recommends an 8' bituminous trail be constructed by the developer concurrent with road construction along the north side of Pioneer Trail and along the east and north sides of Riley Lake Road up to the creek. This trail construction is consistent with requirements of other subdivisions. The City will continue the trail construction along Riley Lake Road to the Chanhassen border where it intersects with the westerly trail. The pad for this trail should be graded by the developer at the time of construction of the golf course. A 40' outlot is being dedicated to the City for trail purposes. The trail meanders slightly and takes advantage of golf course views where it is safe and is screened as much as possible from other land uses to the west. Berms of varying height and a wide variety of plant materials have been used to add interest. OUTLOT DEDICATION: A number of outlots will be dedicated to the City for park purposes. The outlots to be dedicated are shown on Exhibit B. Dedication of these outlots as agreed to in the concept plan approval will be done at time of final plat. MAINTENANCE BUILDING LOCATION: The Bearpath Golf Course will be locating a maintenance building on site to service the golf • 2 c C course. The maintenance building and club house will be reviewed in more detail during site plan review. The general location at this point is on the west side of the golf course opposite the park entry. The site for the maintenance building should be large enough to provide screening of the building and maintenance vehicles from the park and to provide the necessary parking required for maintenance vehicles. ANIMAL CONTROL MEASURES: The proponents of Bearpath are aware of problems with nuisance animals and are taking steps to address it. A 25 foot wide buffer beyond the ordinary high water mark of the wetlands will be maintained protecting water quality as well as wetland vegetation as specified in the concept approval. The 25 foot wide vegetation strip will discourage geese, as they like a clear-cut path to the lake to see predators and to have easy access. Staff gave the proponent a list of deer resistant plant materials for landscaping residential areas where deer are present. A homeowner's design review committee will review house plans as well as plant materials and inform homeowners of potential problems. li RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends approval of this project based on this supplemental staff report and the Planning Staff Report of March 19, 1993. BPC:mdd 3 I lir r J(o ( ( ....AL', - _ .- -- 4 -l. .;-FEr,77 f---•• 1- Z-• - 1-'‘F••.: T-..,..:=----,--,/_-_=-7 ..... -4...., .0 - - - __-1--- ----. _ ir... :1-1,..,.....,---61.--41.1s.5,4,....._:„...,_v„,,,,-r•--:.. ..,..1,--1-i._ .• • 3.......„,:k...., 1;4_ \ . .. .i.e..: ....7..., 000... r_..„ ..:... ›..„.2.. _ .,,,,,._... .„ . 41 .___. ., .,,. ,.,---: . g-.-. 0 .........._d r' ....j ;...i '"---"'" Abl, Prairie View School Park'' • .... lip gr:,.. ........ ...,AT , • ....--.,-I ,' 411 11; V 111111 _410, a\ • 1-=•.:4._,''Cil •. .,i-s.f..,,.\\`'51., --•-•ill--""--:.-7.; 1. -L*.z72, I r 4 imp . ,r..,1,. , a 157,Aim mower .. --- ).'V. r,,- • 0.- f-E-le,-:z-r- __.: /D' C`', -,e;:c-t'''. %y;-•• 1/,' , .ff ••••••••• 1 Edenvale Conservation Area"— ' .r. 'I'2•:- / - -..„, „I -......... --.--• Oltiiiii‘k•A.!f-.1.: 1‘.1.•"5:7`:„1--X.-:-- 1 ..\`'.--4 / ‘ ,. i.._:.. -,..-, 1,, ......1..... ---.... *--t 1)-- -...-„ ' ." ...,1``..": '------N' ...'... . .1.-*1'A•li._ " .: 1..\.. _e,r Conurounitfr anti Zia-Z.T.-...1\7 - 71'"V,'-'4'..“:-.:'-1.' 1'• fri 17-1 / \ ' — EdenTraie Ptut f ::........ ......' ..--1 .s ps%,-,1....., . •, 11 .--;-. ti,..._,. , . .., ...,,, . . . ilor-1:‘"::._',A-110-7...2.4: !.L.,.....'71..4 ( Round Lake Park- - i <",`C,'-'" ...-e. --,L. ,...-- `, L.,.,,,)-- ...„5.1.,:i • tt .., .‘. •• •/ .:::::;s%:,.. ...- - ---, -.',"<&>. ••'-',:i - ' ,-7 :"A.,- '._'•7'•'.7- - ....% •-+, '''' f-4,'''',-.3%.-'.: - 1 . -...--.4.6-,;(__• •• •-•:%-l.-7.:(72"7-C\ 1\., \ ss. ,--.-7,-1-q--r\_,t--"r_.4...:1 ( ..(/.• \ . \r* ____ - ,, '-.-- -----,--•--•--.=11-=..t."r7-1= 1.4-1.-.1 ,--A , Ii" ---''- .Ll' -1 .4 .4 . - --• '^- ---7 , &lri' '.:7-11=____-z-`,.. ?3? - f, -5:.;_- ;-• g. ''-7-7 -1..E.j,--1 ..at • •-,-•,-;_,.., .- ..,,-.1.-i.7.-17.)./4-‘ 2,`" •?;-- . Lf..., . ( , .... , ... -II I ' 1-'1-'`".-•-_ li• .'t-j•-•'77: :14:-..-7-_,....::741 UMW ......,..,,.,. ,.....„,„A„. L,......„j .:z . 'es _ , tz-7,-;----7 --.- I (I- N`i06.1-1-11. ... 1 —.1... ..,,..1 _ i ----.`\/ s. ' ':"---:--.- 1 ' 27..... q_.., II ii 1 I . t - -.,S.._.-., • -:!:7. ' ,.._ _L.,, . . • ..... - . . .-., '-:- •;:.AI ; r--. E".•.-it:V ';''''' '''' ___ „,•••••-v' /-••••-..",..,,•;.,_••:,..,,,,,....,..,...._/,' .,...;- / s.i. .."••••••./. .--/";.._ 4 I -..- =.•_•-rt.,---_ _41 ---.----- •* -• . 4 -4.......„. 1 - a 1 : . IAL--- .... ., . _ ,.-.....--;5 I N ‘. 1/11:. : .....K.. .[..,,/N4 >. "' '''''.....".' ''.."..."...41".11, •\.1.0 4;41' ,...,....., • _ .!. I , .. ;;;,,..../"....._......,,* ,-..-. L,,,,.. , .„....,.. ..........7._____,_,,morempmew I • -.. 1 -- ..41111. X' ' 111 • A7---11CH--1.H >./ le __.. . ---,,-. „.-i_____....,. ..0...,..„....._, . _r- ,---.-1.Pheasant Woods Park- e ......f.,...„......,.• _::A_•____• 1___.•,.,.r,..1„_,.,.„_1,,,,,... \. VI •.6'.•'\ i-‘--it5,--"- Miller Park My.s.„:..... -.1-. .-; •--,-\.,._ ,--.-.-k.-,..•,..._v...,p„i...i..i..::._:....,_....,1i,, __.. , . _.,. . , ... ,,..... _ :: ... „..._ ..,..„ A, ..... ..111•• .... ...` --- 4-2.:::.-__.-•••• , _ 'a/117'6111111HW :II ., "'A • CNN E.P.40. — 1=IL---:-..--%- iii a - 1 :,!,i1111! . , - ; II i --nZAlt-• Ili •.i,I, ' ,1 , ,1:I••17-77- . I : Hir!rvIljlitti ,1,11; V : . ......;,_-- •-,.;,.....,.:.=.__. ,. %. : 1 . .•I6.16 / . ... .-- t..7's.-<',•• ' \: ' '' • 1 I' 1 ! .,..- -6, t.:1 d j•:li 4,11.11 11 ,, 1 .tO 4111 : 1 . .%.1-\'.1V 4 6.: .;,.7----yi- ; . • "11= s' ' ' ' -1 -:. Rod Rock L31(e Park 1 ' It! '11,4 i '. ' ''. 1! ; 111elliII „I' , „ LI.'16 i ' ------" •-2 _ 14%.,,,,,,,,ini.,4,...:bi....,112.,.1.,‘ 11:. ' . . _Pione r Park' • ......s. , tik.:.__•_ — S i ,..- -,,, ---—----7-7 HI 111 : i•-•-='—', k...(-7-1 --:. . : : •1.0,11 , i r ‘, •o- . -"-- -=.---4 . ----- -.7.,--:.-,-• \ Riley Lak Paak 1,1:i II h, 1 i __ ---.--.... ' ri ii----7----f•:•----11 '..it-_.•,- -•....). \ ,--- 11 -1\11mit,ii .00.1-- _..; :',....____, -. : - ....z----7-.r.-;szl.-..,so::........, • IC 6 I V •:I.• !1 1 I 1,11 I! 1 100e , y.,...... I I' ., •' '; ' 1'- ----.--. '...... 1.4•4. :-....,:i...;.--7 4_ •-te '/'s - ' ;;;:::"--, 1 ,• :;I 777-jle :V..= ; 1 ------7-7—„ ,, j4 ---4:... .... . ,.... Staring__._.. - • Lake Park • ( \ '''''''' '. -711 ' 'Ijill,.." , ---"t3, -• .....7---,. .-__ ,, : •.- !1 I ,•. ::;:,! ,/ ILI\\ \I 11..;,...: ; ______1 _,. , •.• A• ! ..s..,.., , , _ . ---- --•"--- ,, . 11 .----#0°.- --.1. • : li.:7'•".. 1 ___.--1—;--- ' ., ----"•-• /. \., _ . . , A ,--, ,---- - , v Flying Cloud Athletic Fields ' - 1.'-L 1 . r-^\ --' -,,. f ; • ,--<.... • ; . 7 It1,1* : :-.--- 0,. . ., - ,....,..,......_„. .,---.it-:-.,„, • . ! , - .7.1.- _ J,....,.____ 1 . , , ... .44 i 1 ..:-• 7 iiii - ---- _-'— . • k t .i' ... _ N___ .,,. /."( -.....i.:,i • .,,, r- ,_ 141 ...-•i •••••.-_-....: -•:----f 1;14- • / 1I t '':-.. ,:i- • • --';',t----- - ....• . . =-<--- •''t--_ •••,..-. __, , . v • - N:----':--)Q- 1 --„,----...). r.... . A r N-., ,, : --I. . . -r.--#--_-.,:--, - --,,,,,,,,-.----, "ii .... .: .,. r .•..• . V • ----41:— / ' s,,,,..,%;...zs ., ,.s...;il, -- • / ii et:I ..... ,- _- 7' -m-r-_--z---. 11 , : --, / it . :1 - - --- -- • ,,• ••- . --4 ! (. 1 ; r----: ' , — [___7 • _ -- . •I I. - -- ,.. 1--- ',... I . i i"?-r----2 ; • 1 ,,) ( Exhibit , C C .. 4101 i 11 .la . ; r 1 fir/ 'L. ._ '1 . Nam% I • . • \L • ihr-6 \ ..-,bg\I \ 4 i .... ( _ . \ . 4."' ) . . ' - L6A4 VeC"IG051-J wi-Ill Ftaft c r . 411k Jo Exhibit B ff - MEMORANDUM - • c TO: Development Review Committee Members • FROM: Engineering Division DATE: March 9, 1993 SUBJECT: Bearpath Golf and Country Club The following are preliminary comments by the Engineering Department in reviewing plans for Bearpath Golf and Country Club provided by Sienna Corporation dated October 23, 1992, with a latest revision date of February 19, 1993. The plans reviewed consist of a preliminary plat, preliminary grading plan, preliminary utility plan, and tree preservation plan. The comments will be divided into sections consisting of streets, utilities, and grading and drainage. STREETS • Developer's engineer should pursue design alternatives for Dell Road to limit wetland encroachment and potential impacts. • • It is anticipated that an additional 17 feet of right-of-way dedication will be required for those areas adjacent to CSAH 1. Contact Hennepin County to verify. • The intersection of Riley Lake Road and CSAH 1 should be revised to intersect as nearly as possible to right angles (no more than ± 5 degree variation from 90 degrees). • Use Eden Prairie's standard design for cul-de-sac's. • It is understood that all crest vertical curves meet or exceed a 30 mph design speed for all streets within this project. It is recommended on the major streets, Bearpath North and South that crest vertical curves for these streets be designed to a 35 mph design speed for an added safety margin. • Provide traffic study for the entrance to this project from Dell Road showing traffic turning movements and any potential car stacking problems. • Access for existing homes located near Riley Park must be maintained throughout the construction of riley Lake Road. • A permit will be necessary from Hennepin County for proposed grading within CSAH 1 and Hennepin County Railroad Authority Right-of-Way. ( Bearpath Golf and Country Club • March 9, 1993 Page 2 of 2 UTILITIES • Provide two 6-inch water services to Riley Lake Park. • An additional sanitary sewer and watermain stub should be provided to the north border of the property east of the Street D cul-de-sac. • Provide a sanitary sewer extension to the northeast border of the property at Outlot C at an elevation of approximately 869. • Sanitary sewer invert elevations should be revised to 870 at the south end of the project at Pioneer Trail, and 868 at Dell Road and the future U.S. Homes site. GRADING AND DRAINAGE • The storm sewer plan as proposed is incomplete: Storm sewer connections between ponds are missing, storm sewer within Dell Road and Lake Riley Road are not shown, and storm sewer outfall to Lake Riley is not shown. • Provide drainage area map. • Develop piped outlet to Riley Lake. • The developer should investigate the possibility of an existing drain tile system that drains the orchard south of Pioneer Trail across this site with an outfall to this project. If a drain tile system is found, provisions should be made for the continued operation of drain tile. • Structure openings for proposed homes shall be two feet above any high water elevation of surrounding ponds. • Recommend that the owner develop a comprehensive erosion and sediment control plan for this project utilizing Best Management Practices (BMP) as outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's manual, Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas. Said plan should address methods and procedures for protecting adjacent areas and wetlands from sediment impacts during grading operations, phasing plan for grading operation in which disturbed areas are minimized, and a restoration plan detailing methods used for restoring disturbed areas. • Dsk:JJ:BEARPATH.CC q )C) C C 7y- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South 410 HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 PHONE: (612) 930-2500 FAX (612) 930-2513 TDD: (612) 930-2696 March 3, 1993 Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat - Bearpath Golf and Country Club CSAH 1, Northeast quadrant of Lake Riley Road Section 19/30, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 2045 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements to this segment of CSAH 1 the developer should dedicate an additional 17' along CSAH 1 making the right of way 50' from the center of CSAH 1. In the area of Outlot 0 the additional 17' of right of way should be dedicated north and south of the CSAH 1 centerline making the right of way corridor 100' wide. - The proposed location of the Dell Road north intersection with CSAH 1 meets the minimum sight distance requirements for the posted speed limit and is acceptable to Hennepin County. - The proposed intersection of the emergency vehicle road and CSAH 1, directly opposite the existing Dell Road south intersection with CSAH 1, is acceptable to Hennepin County. A system prohibiting public use of this access must be installed across this emergency access. Any future upgrading of this access will again require an approved Hennepin County entrance permit. - Because of a small knoll just east of the Riley Lake Road/CSAH 1 intersection, this intersection does not meet the minimum sight distance requirements for the posted speed limit. The developer can relocate the Lake Riley Road/CSAH 1 intersection to a safer location or regrade the small rise so the existing intersection will meet the minimum sight distance requirements. - Any new access to a county road, a revision to an existing access or a change in land use requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2548 for entrance permit forms. glil HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer q 1i t C Mr. Chris Enger March 3, 1993 Page 2410 - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway removal , drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, Thomas D. ohnson, P.E. Transport tion Planning • TDJ/LDW:lw John Bushey • 9000 Riley Lake Road Eden Prairie, MN 55347 18 April, 1993 Eden Prairie City Council do Community Development Department City Offices,Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Council Members: Because I cannot attend the upcoming Public Hearing on the Bearpath Development, I am submitting a few comments in writing. I have a few concerns at this stage of the planning process: 1) Building site locations: When the city agreed with the developer to trade the green space corridor and future public walking path along Riley Creek for a much less desireable trail along the western development boundary, Sienna stressed the open green space around the development as part of the compensation. I noticed in the latest plan that in an effort to fit in more lots, they are encroaching on that open space. See the circled areas on the attached plan. Some of these lots were not on the plan when the trail corridor was traded away. Note also that in order to provide access to these lots, non-standard cul-de-sacs are planned. I propose that the open space all along Riley Lake Road be returned to the original plan. 2) Improvements to Riley Lake Road: My understanding of the plan for the road is to have Sienna pay for improvements from Pioner Trail to the Riley Creek • crossing. These are to include a bike trail and possibly a sidewalk. The City, and I assume other property owners, are then to pay for improvements west of the creek to the city line. However, there is no schedule set for those improvements. The current gravel road is a considerable source of sediment runoff into Riley Lake both across property on the south side ofg the road and directly into Riley Creek. It also requires regular maintenence grading and additional gravel. This last quarter mile will be the only remaining gravel section of Riley Lake Road. I hope that the entire road project can be completed from Pioneer Trail to the Chanhassen border at one time. There is a lot of traffic already on Riley Lake Road, and no safe place to walk or ride with our kids. Please insure that a safe trail along the road is included during the construction phase. 3) Public Access to the development: Sienna had previously agreed to allow bicycle and pedestrian access to the roads of the development through the main gate. The most recent plan I have seen now includes some sort of gated to crossing of the LRT corridor, which would limit access. Pedestrian and bicycle access to the development streets should be maintained as agreed by Sienna. Thank you for your consideration of these items. Sincerely, S Nr .i. -----: • -Ni 44t4 ib- 1 qi CM . --,'"---. 0 .........______ , ...,. ,s..s., vosti 21.1.2... , .......e° P . . '.Ps \ .. 1' .••..'' -'- .. ...h\ 5.. 4143:44; i: 4 •-•Vt--,...,,;,, 1 _ ,...,*,-.Tyili -t,4,i, :,.....::,::P--•, __ A ,._.,_ _______. ,.;.. ‘., . .. .,... v _ .. . • .....„...... .. . :, _ „1,..,._ --- , ..--1--., ,. x.,....;.............,.. . t......„',.--r.•' 1 . • V `v-,,,,,i n•• Chre).‘ . '4. • - ) ,st.. . ,,,,,....-, _ . .„.4:7 •-r. , ...,, - -, 1-- 4. ,..r. - , - ' . ... • I. -e'.,‘,Z. 0 _....• ..., ,- I., . -..,. ... ,.,, \ , ---t....,,. .;''S..-- -.t-'''' ' I.,' .,• '`... 4-A.... 14\ ‘ . . „ \ 4 . . .._ . ........,n .----.• -,..---,. •,. . • . . , , ^ N - .4. • . i_. 14- ,...._% .on,7---s46.„..0,- . "'ifs \- --,* •it A• -is.... /- 'Z* .. • -- . • •`- s• ' : -•• - -,i - •.: 4 • , •..-• ..• !--,,s, ..Al% „Mew 'Ai*-''' ' • -. . . .7 ' s"; • g r __ , •-•-..-:.:.;,jiiiiti?• -te"'"..', . , , , - . . • ._/—'--- ------!----, I " - •'.:7'.')-"L"' le'.".-- N:""1":1!".....erft.",\•• - 's•. . .. .. 1 - _ :..,:•<,.. :: ..., . • •—t.. ., - . , . _, I ',•••,..,,,,.4 . , ,..f.t,. ,., —" -*• ',.. ' 1 '14''' ' - . \..-. '''6) - ' ,24.„,,_ vi "!kc :, '''.. ' :— ....i...:i....; 1 t( t ; h• .0,`.-— '-. - — . , .5,7 ... 4 .•'t 4.N- ' ..,, . t* / - • 'P'.14.:1. . • .' .fl$*.3.; et$811\11; I. -\1 •7 --'''.'4* • • v.. - - . .t . . --L.....:0 F . ,..,,. ..,-- . ,- ,,,,,„, 1 A , •__„,..., 1:......„,„:• -. 4,...goie..,.. -,, - 4- , , ..• !. .• ... . •,.......--4--..,-,A.:.--, • ''''7' ----1 ' \ ' ‘1 ' ; •—• i • , . - -• • -'. .-• 'NZ-‘:"•%.1. t t .. -- 1 Ei ... _ ._ .....: -- --/.v.--,-' ° .7......----,r.--- .. . . . . ii.,... ..... - ,I i. . : . , . , . - - i .,.. : ...,...,..D, ' . /./N f sf"*,, 1 •i ' t :+ .4 ' ` N ' \ \ ,, /40 ia, 1. • :•:. - r --L.... . / ' ,0", .ef :sty i ., . ,-,-, ,.. . .,,-- ,.... • . • -...„ -,- . ,/ e 4 I i-. ..)r,-.7. , . mr . \. ' " szi • , . No. - 't---- \ , , 0 ‘ *4 4 •‘'s 1144400C4.7 , II Z./ ; • i 1.k't ''' . .; t ”14 :- . \ V\ /Is / . • .1 — :'*-.'• 11 1 .i —-''''' 4:4 -' A a 7 .• - ,.7. •• ‘.1'... •.!.,..'iii i .: .,....71. ;In \ . .116.:c.... ' -:.\\N„ lko.,••41..... t.:' . 0,1 ". ' ? 1,-• '''''' • -.1 :: ...0...117_ .0-... • '.. . lot . 41‘. :11.1)"' .- 4111thlamia• - \i.. • • ; C .. ACVS144 •: • .4,... •-•"'" - Ar ' .- ' ,ce! ifii, ' '.1!"sr- -,,z. ! _•• -- . 1 '•,,. -,C, . ,,,c. ,.. •••. ii .!: 4( ., ,\,,,,.:,'-' Sti4iAl.. -'}IP-Ike...__t_______.__AL- 7'- kili ,•',*'-',-.4.* 4i; . . •••• - -,,t.a: . .;• • , '' ._......--• .,•<- . • , . 4-t-t:: it'.:( 7.:1•11111,,..:„. , ------..----• .. ' -. - '-‘'. "_ . / TS,. (*X....7 .. ,, , • . N .... . ;,.....„.r.,, : . r.. • . , .. 1.,..---..4.z....- -,....... ,1..,. • 44' .,;''' - 1414A 4171114'' ' i I. iy• • . . .,,,,,,.tei,1 4. , . "h._ • • ..,..., ,..,,,.. ,„. ,.• • • ,..0.0%.--.4 . , ,..._--Aic,..._ ._ ...-_, . i'M 4,,,,. - - 4-:•• -'4. s."- - - -, • ' * -, .•,. ,. p.. -•4... .41;411c -?.., ,'., \,_•:,.., --,-- v" r1,1,-p..,.--.7-111r:k:f • --......'` .e. ............, -:;-aii,- -; • 4-,..!.,04.,, - ;.•„..P.; 7.,"... ...........-7.< 4... .i.04 .-r-,.....--..•--.7.... ,."-• '•• • ,,, •••••,,-/ : 1* .... ' 11,401 t'• '4 . A 1 ,10:44N.16:4.,..L. .,...,.... k.;... ....j 047.„; . ......,„V-'10.:.. ,:.r. ,:zifiliip'.1../ • ..' • ...(iir . r ' 4, a ' , 2 •?•' '.3- 7.4.0411r,• Nat , 1 • • ' "le A.- . r-at; Vi k... %( i I- . _iaA . I . ., .. , r ,. ,,,,, ‘ - 411 ••A. . r- , • , t -IX t \ "41A, ' .... i !. 4 .: .0. / i 1 . „ . 1 !Wk._ -. ,-;:::,./. 1/-• • - ‘ 4: rig- - , .. . ii c - A 4: )L -- ' k . % ....... ,, z ...- A4 .... 2 7='-- c '-'• - • . I . jr0•:•-ili. ....••• - _: 1.1. I . ...._.' • . 4CoMir;.. ; A 1 A. • 7 . .. , . x ; . .....-jy, "..- ....4.". • -.----..--'...'''''''''''P.,-'... .''— •' iti; ..... ....... _ i _.... t 4. BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO/LIQUOR STORE • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO/LIQUOR STORE FOR NORTHCO CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store for Northco Corporation dated April 30, 1993, consisting of 10.8 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of May, 1993. • • Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • � J • B. BLOCK BUSTER VIDEO/LIOUOR STORE by Northco Corporation. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the Community Commercial Zoning District on 10.54 acres, Site Plan Review on 10.54 and Preliminary Plat of 10.54 acres into three lots, and road right-of-way with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Location: Northwest Quadrant of the Intersection of County Road 4 and Highway 5. Franzen reported that petitions were distributed to the Planning Commission this evening. Bruce Carlson, Manager of Prairie Village Mall, stated that Northco Corporation had owned the mall for over 10 years. The mall has struggled over the years; however, the mall is currently 90% occupied with the Minnesota Fabric store which opened today. The proposal was to construct a small building which would accommodate the Eden- Prairie Liquor Store and Blockbuster Video. Carlson stated that Blockbuster Video had 14 stores in the Twin City The building would be 10,750 square feet. Blockbuster Video would occupy 7,500 square and the Eden Prairie Liquor Store would occupy 4,200 square feet. Carlson believed that the Liquor Store would have a significant improvement in visibility with the move. Carlson stated that the City had hired an independent consultant to look at the site and the consultant had stated that this would be the best site available if the Liquor Store were to move its location. The exterior of the building would be brown brick to match the existing mall. The signage meets code. Sandstad asked about the color issue regarding signage. Carlson stated that Blockbuster Video had specific colors which they used for signage. Carlson believed that this issue could be dealt with in design. Carlson believed that parking and traffic were the main issues for residents and Staff. Carlson stated that he did not anticipate a parking problem and believed that additional traffic would be marginal and would not create a major problem. The building would be constructed to allow the traffic flow to continue as it currently does. The existing mall would not change. The existing pylon sign would be eliminated and 2 new sign would be placed 1 on County Road 4 and 1 on Highway 5. Vincent Driessen, representing Blockbuster Video, stated that Blockbuster Video was part of a national franchise chain but was locally owned and financed. This is a family video store which believes that community involvement is important. Blockbuster Video is larger than most video 7 • stores and believes strongly in customer service. Driessen stated that Blockbuster Video was anxious to become a member of the Eden Prairie business community. • Wissner asked if Blockbuster Video had not had a store here before. Driessen replied that a store was here; however, they had experienced a bad experience with a franchisee. Carlson believed that the traffic and parking issues had been addressed. Carlson added that a small variance for Base Area Ratio was required. Franzen reported that 3 issues needed to be discussed; Base Area Ratio variance, traffic, and parking. Franzen stated that traffic in this location has always been an issue. Franzen said that Staff had compared parking with similar projects and believed that with 5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet this would be adequate. Franzen stated that a question would be if there was already a traffic problem would the City want to add more businesses. Franzen noted that a Base Area Ratio variance has not been granted for commercial use. Dick Brown, 7685 Heritage Road, questioned the merit of a Base Area Ratio variance. Brown asked if traffic was limited why you wanted to build a store there. Brown believed that the building would obstruct the view at this intersection. Brown questioned Carlson's statement about a minimal impact on traffic; then where will the customers come from. Brown believed that parking was a problem and the access to the facility was terrible with only 1 entrance. Brown stated that the parking lot was currently full of water and questioned where the drainage would go and what would the mall do with the snow in the winter. Brown questioned if Waigreens had been considered in the extra traffic in the area. Brown stated that he was opposed • to any additional to the mall. Barbara Anderson, 17247 Round Lake Road, stated that she had seen businesses come and go over the years. Anderson said that the parking lot is in terrible condition. Anderson was opposed to any addition to the mall. Anderson believed that the variance would set a precedent and give this mall an unfair advantage over other facilities. David Barczak, 16368 Sheldon Avenue, questioned the area to be rezoned as shown on the map mailed out. The shaded area included part of the Church parking lot. Sandstad replied that the Church would not be affected; the shaded area extended further than necessary. Barczak stated that Wagner Way was already difficult to get in or out of. Barczak noted that there were already other video stores within walking distance. Barczak asked what height the new signs would be and if they would be visible from the existing homes. Tom Lauby, owner of the video store at Prairie Center Mall, stated that he had left a mall in Eden Prairie because outside signage was not allowed. Lauby said that he had moved to a new mall which was only 10% full. Lauby believed that any business which could locate in this location would do well. Lauby stated that if Blockbuster Video moved in he would have to close his doors. 411 8 `? 1 1 Carol Scott, 7691 Heritage Road, concurred with what had already been said. Scott said that currently you could see from County Road 4 to Highway 5 and believed that a building in location would create a safety problem. Scott questioned why existing empty spaces in Eder Prairie could not be used. Kevin Novotny, manager of Pizza Hut, stated that there was a lot of vacant space in Eden Prairie. Novotny believed that the Prairie Village Mall was 75% full at best. Novotny stated that the Prairie Center Mall had a lot of vacant space. Novotny believed that Blockbuster Video would do well anywhere in Eden Prairie. He stated that parking and traffic were already heavy. Novotny further believed that Walgreens would add a lot of traffic to the area. Novotny said that in the pizza delivery business you need to be able to get to your customers quickly and the intersection of County Road 4 and Highway 5 is already a problem. Novotny requested that Alternative 2 of the Staff Report be considered. Sandstad read into the record a letter from Lois Bohnsack. Jim Connelly, manager of Panorama, believed that the City should not grant Blockbuster Video anything that the City would not grant another local business. Connelly stated that he had worked under City regulations. Connelly believed that there was ample vacant space in the City already. Connelly believed that this location was the ideal retail space in Eden Prairie. Blockbuster Video does between $70,000 and $100,000 of revenue in 1 month. Connelly noted that the average sale would be $5.00 and believed that at this rate a significant amount of traffic would be created. Connelly believed that the Blockbuster Sign would be a major beacon after dark. He said that he accepted the fact the Blockbuster Video would be in Eden Prairie; it wie a question of fairness to all businesses. Connelly stated that he had been in Eden Prairie fo long time paying taxes. Carlson stated that the mall only had 2 vacant spaces at this time. Carlson said that the potholes in the parking lot were being filled. Carlson noted that Blockbuster's peak hours would be after the dinner hour. Competition occurs everywhere. Carlson stated that he had not complained to the City when Walgreens wanted to come in across the street. Lauby stated that he had seen the manhole in the parking lot of the Prairie Village Mall come up during a heavy rain. Lauby believed that the sewer system should be dealt with before further construction considered. Clinton stated that he remembered when the Walgreens store was being reviewed and the concerns raised at that time regarding traffic. Clinton questioned why the City would consider building in this location. Clinton noted that business competition was not a concern for the Planning Commission to deal with. Bauer believed that the only alternative was Alternate #3 in the Staff Report. Bauer said that he could not approve a plan which did not meet City Code. 9 • Wissner questioned if the City really wanted to have a Liquor Store with its name on it on this • prominent corner. Schlampp believed that it would be a mistake to consider a variance. Schlampp concurred that the drainage was already poor at this mall and believed that it should be taken cmre of before any additional construction approved. Schlampp believed that nothing would be sand if this facility could be located in the existing mall. Schlampp believed that this was the rrnost advantageous spot for a retail business. Schlampp believed in free enterprise but believed tlhat the variances were improper. Sandstad believed that the project was poorly designed. Sandstad was disappointed that Eden Prairie would want its name on a Liquor Store in this location. Bauer stated that he would be in favor of the proponent returning with a plan that would meet City Code and did not require variances. Bauer recommended a continuance.. MOTION: Bauer moved, seconded by Schlampp to continue the item to the April 26, 1993 meeting. Carlson asked how they could proceed to the City Council. Franzen replied that the quickest way to get to the City Council would be for the Planning Commission to deny the project if the proponent is unwilling to make changes to the plan. Sandstad stated if the Planning Commission continued the item it could not proceed to the City Council. Franzen replied that if it were continued the plan would need to come back to the Planning Commission for action. Bauer stated that if the proponent had a plan which met City Code requirements he could support it. MOTION: Bauertowithdraw them 'onfor moved, seconded by Clinton motion a continuance and to recommend denial. Motion carried 5-0-0. Reason for denial of the project are as set out in Alternative 2 of the Staff Report: Variances would set a precedent, parking, traffic and drainage are problem areas already and this would create an economic advantage. Schlampp believed that a denial was the best way to get to the City Council. Schlampp did not believe this was a dead issue. Schlampp recommended that the proponent come back with a different plan. • Lauby asked how he could find out when the plan would be reviewed by the City Council. Franzen believed that it would be reviewed at the 1st meeting in May if the proponent decided to proceed. • C C STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Community Development FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: April 9, 1993 SUBJECT: Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Northco LOCATION: NW Quadrant of the Intersection of County Road 4 and Highway 5 REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the Community Commercial Zoning District on 10.54 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 10.54 acres. • 3. Preliminary Plat of 10.54 acres into 3 lots and road right- of-way. 1 • bog...) LAI`.--0�r _r W v 2 V H ; C DUCK. •• z. ►31., ` -LAKE �� 23 N� ? 1. � .• s•.r..� .-�.: A 2 4 DORIANN 4 R• •' o 047. Els...........,...... -7--.1, '. ',...;%1 '--- tli 4), • 1:-(7 ift: y,.. t` i ea.MALLARD CT. CI :.1—)-- 130.ROSALLA LA. 11.1:111.L.r./Zd W ND PRAIRIE Ctai 8 POND CIRCLE fri.� /..:110H N�y` E Y ��E* c v 8.QUE C t nBRIOI EM►000 C ~ ►N h9, ER R0. --�-- _.... 0 -� �O '� 93EIDf • ROUND ., V .EY LACE WES7GATE LA • �.WIWAMS LA. -."%" ' CDW ESTGATE R .ULLMAN CIR. `' -• ND LAKE ROAD I :.COLLEEN CIR. - L . COLBY CT. " LUT R _ • \p' .41 WE ST GATE 1 (x. (} 1111 SIM!.KILMER AVE. ;:Lt �y� '• r __ •' agiE p ;,;� 1.. ]. .4AftEFILROCK. ' 9.7. a; O 41. n129. .7, . :.. 7 41"Iir c " - cr 2 ii 4.° .„-_. ' • • 4.....,.,..._..IM w�► Q.*1 —BISCAYNE BLVD 129.0AKOTA `"- -�� CJ i�' ' /. BELAIR LANE LAKE .. . . 0 �•• LLAC CENTRAL 8DL- MIDDLE....., ) .�� •� .. ....r• • -" . • _ CAPRICE L.A. or N , .,.... /�, ................... ....,. • • .,• _ .. .i....................... ,...: . . . TT. NECMAS CIR.ill • . .-; �` \t, - MOB LI a • �) . L` ; ...• �• RED �. CDR- C C Staff Report Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store • April 9, 1993 • BACKGROUND Following are primary questions that the Commission should think about while reading the details of the Staff Report. The answers to these questions will depend upon your interpretation and point of view. The conclusion section will suggest options for the City. 1. Should the City consider granting a base area ratio variance above the .2 allowed by City Code? 2. Can the traffic generated by the proposed commercial development be accommodated by the existing road system? 3. Is there enough parking to meet City Code? DEVELOPMENT REQUEST The development request is the construction of 10,750 square feet building in the southeast corner of the parking lot of the Prairie Village Mall. The land owned by the Mall will be subdivided into three lots. One lot for the Mall, and a separate lot for each building. The lot • lines for the Liquor Store and Video Update follow the exterior walls of the building. BASE AREA RATIO VARIANCE The base area ratio as defined by City Code is the ratio of the total base area (gross square footage of the building) to the total lot area. The base area ratio for this project based on 96,929 gross square feet on 470,328 square feet of land area is .206. (The existing Mall is 86,179 square feet and the proposed new construction is 10,750 square feet.) The maximum base area ratio permitted in the Community Commercial Zoning District is .20. The proponent is requesting a variance from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. The total land area owned by the Developer extends to the center line of Highway 5. (470,328 sq. ft.) Since the Highway is an easement and not right-of-way, this area can be used to calculate base area ratio. For comparison purposes had the easement been given as right-of-way, the net land area would be 363,167 sq. ft. The existing mall base area ratio on the gross land area would be .18 and on the net land area would be .236. With the added commercial space, the base area ratio is .206 on the gross and .267 on the net. This information is provided to give a comparison of the intensity and visual size of the commercial area outside of the easement. 2 41111 Staff Report • Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store April 9, 1993 The City has not granted base area ratio variances for shopping centers. Although variances are based on hardship, this request for variance may have merit if the impacts of increased base area ratio can be mitigated. Traffic, parking, drainage, and impact on surrounding uses are issues which would require mitigation. TRAFFIC Prior to the intersection being upgraded in 1988, this intersection operated at a level of service F. Level of Service F is a condition where a car would have to wait through more than one signal change to get through the intersection. Highway intersections are designed to operate at a level of service D (some to no delay) according to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The current intersection is level of service is between C to D. The level of service at this intersection will go to an F condition with additional development in the area. The traffic study for the Southwest Area (generally described as approximately 1,000 acres south and west of the intersection of Highway 4 and 5) indicated that when 1700 additional housing units were built in the southwest area, that the level of service at this intersection will go to an F condition. The study further recommends that to reduce traffic congestion an additional left turn is needed on northbound County Road 4 to westbound on Highway 5 and from westbound on Highway 5 to southbound on County Road 4 to alleviate the traffic congestion. These improvements may require additional road right-of-way. Although the percent of traffic increase from this proposal will be small in terms of the total traffic going through the intersection, the question for the City is should additional square footage be allowed which may contribute to a worsening of the traffic at the intersection. PARKING The City Code requirement for commercial uses is 6 spaces per 1000. When the Prairie Village Mall was approved in the early 70's, a parking variance was granted to 5.6 spaces per 1000. Other malls, such as the Prairie Village Mall and the Preserve Mall were approved at 5.5 spaces per 1000. From a practical point of view, these shopping centers tend to function well on a daily basis, with the exception of holidays. • Staff Report Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store • April 9, 1993 The Staff continues to monitor parking at commercial centers on a regular basis and has determined that although 5.5 spaces per 1000 is adequate for large shopping centers (100,000 sq. ft.) for peak parking demand. On a daily basis, not all of these parking spaces are used because they are not practical. For example, the Rainbow Food shopping center has 4.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of practical parking spaces out in front, while the remainder of the spaces are behind the building and are used primarily for employees. According to code, parking is calculated based upon the gross floor area of the building. In this case, based upon a total 96,929 square feet at 6 spaces per 1000, 581 parking spaces would be needed. If consideration is given to the original parking variance, at 5.6 spaces per 1000, a total of 539 parking spaces would be needed. There is not enough room on this site to build either amount of parking unless a parking deck is created. When the parking variance to 5.6 per 1000 was approved in 1973, it was based upon the net leasable area excluding the mall portion. Since that time, all shopping centers are strip malls. Any exterior mall under a canopy is not included in the calculation of parking. To be fair, parking should be calculated based upon the net leasable area (75,177 sq. ft.) and the new building construction (10,750). Since 5.5 parking spaces per 1000 seems to be working on the large shopping centers, total parking needed on this site would be 472 parking spaces. Of the • 472 total parking spaces, there should be 386 practical parking spaces (4.5 spaces per 1000) in front of the Mall and adjacent to the Blockbuster Video/ Liquor Store. The existing current Prairie Village Mall has 368 existing parking spaces at a parking ratio of 4.78 spaces per 1000. (Proof of parking to 5.5 per 1000 is possible with restripping and parking behind the building.) Parking has never been a problem at this shopping center because the type of uses in the center do not generate a high parking demand. The City must consider all types of uses that can go in a shopping center to get a realistic average number of parking spaces needed. The City code takes this into consideration. Should additional tenants fill vacant space in the mall, and if another use replaced the fabric store, there could be additional parking demand. The Site Plan as proposed, depicts 311 parking spaces at a ratio of 3.6 spaces per 1000 of parking. The proof of parking plan indicates a total parking possible of 458 parking spaces at a ratio of 5.33 spaces per 1000 with 391 spaces at a ratio of 4.55 spaces per 1000 out front. Since total parking is less than recommended, the City has a choice to grant a parking variance, or recommend less building square footage on the property. The parking variance may have merit based on existing parking demand. Peak parking demand or a different mix of high parking generator uses cannot be accommodated. 4 �\ C Staff Report • Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store April 9, 1993 DRAINAGE The southeast corner of the parking lot has flooding problems due to snow melt and heavy rains. All of the storm drainage from this shopping center drains in an easterly direction to a storm sewer pipe under County Road 4 which discharges into a wetland area behind Sterling Ponds. The size of the pipe under County Road 4 has a limited capacity. Although there are additional catch basins provided-in the new storm drainage plan, and a ponding area, the volume of water entering the storm sewer pipe remains relatively the same. The storm drainage plan works for a 10 year storm, but six parking spaces would have 8/10 of a foot of water as well as the drive aisles even with the proposed ponding area. During a 100 year storm an overflow to the county ditch would relieve additional water. This overflow is set at a elevation 1 foot lower than the building, so the building would not flood. The proposed ponding area can also function as a NURP pond. ARCHITECTURE The proposed building construction would be meeting the City Code requirement for a minimum of 75% base brick, glass or stone. The building color will match the existing building. Awnings • are new building should be the same color of the awnings on the main building. The architectural plans do not depict a solution for mechanical equipment screening. LANDSCAPING The landscaping requirement for this project is based upon a caliper inch requirement. The amount of caliper inches required would be 31 inches. The landscape plan does not indicate a caliper inch amount but only indicates the type of plant materials proposed. Prior to review by the City Council, the proponent shall submit a landscape plan depicting a minimum of 33 caliper inches. In addition, parking areas must be screened according to City Code. Since the existing parking lot is not effectively screened, the Staff would recommend a mixture of additional shade trees, conifers and shrub plantings along County Road 4 and Highway 5. SIGNS The proposed signs on the building meet the City Code requirement. The Blockbuster Video sign is proposed to be blue and yellow color which is not consistent with the colors which were approved with the sign variance request for signs on the main building. The Staff would recommend that the Blockbuster Video color be red and white. • 5 t, Staff Report Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store • April 9, 1993 Two freestanding pylon signs are proposed, one on Highway 5 and one on County Road 4. The maximum height of each sign cannot exceed 20'. One sign can be a maximum of 80 square feet and the other sign can be a maximum of 36 square feet. TRASH ENCLOSURE The trash enclosure study recommends a size, dimension, design, and location for trash area. If applied to this project, the trash area should be enclosed within the building with access by an overhead door. DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES The following are three different scenarios for development on this property: Alternative #1: Approve as submitted based on the following: a. Would require Board of Appeals and Adjustments Variances. • Parking from 6/1000 to 5.33/1000 • Base area ratio from .20 to .206 • Lot size variance from 5 acres to 4200 sq. ft. and 6500 sq. ft. b. Traffic increase may have a small impact on the 4/5 intersection. c. The increase in square footage is 2864 square feet above City Code for the property. Based on current use of the shopping center and with new construction, parking should be adequate. Future uses within the Mall may be limited based on parking provided. d. Would help the economic vitality of the Center. 6 • C C Staff Report • Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store April 9, 1993 Alternative #2: Deny the request as submitted based on the following: a. Variances would set a precedent. No commercial centers have been granted base area ratio variances. b. Tenant mixes change and long-term parking would be a problem. c. Contributes additional traffic to a busy intersection which will worsen in the future. d. Would create an economic advantage over other shopping centers which are limited to a .20 base area ratio. Alternative #3: Meet City Code Requirements based on the following: • a. Parking to meet City Code Requirement for 472 spaces overall and 386 spaces of practical parking in front. This would be consistent with other large shopping centers. b. Base area ratio should not exceed .20 or 7886 additional sq. ft. and provided there is adequate parking. This would be consistent with other shopping centers. c. Traffic generation would be consistent with other shopping centers which are limited to .20 base area ratio. d. The type of commercial uses should also be restricted based on traffic generation, for example, a bank, fast food restaurant, gas station or video store will generate more traffic than a liquor store, a bookstore, flower store, etc. e. Would not create an economic advantage. 7 Staff Report Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store • April 9, 1993 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff presents the following choices for the Planning Commission: If the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of the plans as submitted, then approval would be based upon a zoning district amendment within the existing community commercial zoning district, a site plan review and preliminary plat on 10.8 acres based on plans dated April 9, 1993, subject to recommendations in the Staff Report regarding architecture, signage, lighting, landscaping, trash enclosures and drainage and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to review by. the City Council, proponent shall: a. Modify the architectural plans to provide for rooftop mechanical equipment screening, and revised canopy and sign colors. b. Modify the landscape plan to meet the caliper inch requirement and screening of parking areas. c. Modify the trash enclosure area to be inside of the building. • 2. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: a. Submit detailed storm water runoff of utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. b. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review • by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: a. Meet with the Fire Marshal. b. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. II. If the Planning Commission is uncomfortable with the development request as proposed because of the variances for parking and base area ratio and traffic problems, then one option would be to recommend denial. 8 4111 C Staff Report Blockbuster Video/Liquor Store April 9, 1993 III. If the Planning Commission feels that some development is possible on this property, but should meet City Code requirements, then a third alternative would be to return the development plans to the proponent and continue the item to allow the proponent to make the following changes: a. Building square footage limited to 7886 sq. ft. or a .20 base area ratio. b. Parking to City Code at 472 spaces overall and 386 spaces out front. c. Proposed uses with low traffic generation. The Planning Staff would support Alternative III. • • 2 gill / ? .' r ,_.,_ 114� „,__ a. AY- /<2 Z/J - , • G �cf cc��4L L.: d . . ,,, ,.. -e_-->z,,,:„. 7i,L...t.,„----.:2-1-:.e.. .7 J`u-6-1--16e.-7(d ,_1,67 ,___Ite::_ ,":),c-c,r ..-c.t (-,2%e iZ.,(_ &<9-4.--x-c: - c-, ' L/,//. - /i c.'az. il 5- .. z.„-ke,(9 6_/.(-664(/--, 1' .ca /7' ,--/ ,��, C/cJ 1 )L_ 6----- .17,i(:/c(.... cice.,-2-7 ,.!i-y .:.2.--74 -6--)- -_. 7-1/-cl--/A-66-77‹,-t-- ,,___7`;` j .may'(,c�L- ,677/ (1,:e7-' /11-(--"6:--e-C-- • L,2-- G ,Vz___ i- /c� ,./('-'14..--e- 1,..,--„,___ -,--- -z-,?,-„e7,,,-e-A,, ,,,,,,,, (.... , /. , , --cze-e_ ,--,---67-z-c . ,,,Ez --1.'-- /Le('-''' .... v-. e) I Il ;' /,%' / /" 'Li,-` L „ _silk"d G l N I ( c • 6, 1.). /z , � � s 7c.n oO L . 7 70-Lss� � %__ -e7z 7/Z)A44)-m_z-j-, , � , 'L / off- - • NJ/L-z- .) - � n ��-- � � C7— GC S e� a6)e ,ct-t..a7e2,4_) ? C'6 -- . ., C c 0,.. ________ ____7f0;_____ :F) ., /i,,,f,p/L 1_ AI- _________ Tovi is c . -' -Va--`, ID \ --(t-e-%, _S- ri. --Q. _-- ------------ - 0- 93- . te-th,41 0-2"- -U ---- ---}'")-`2) -V . ______ __L_Ctsti i' - _:*.4a\-&'-3 . I.:1-1! -VI Pi: -J2/71' g-e_ 4_-_74- 4_ _.k/o-r-til. 7-1,-v., __________12_ __QUA., ..,f,e1,2, i ,--- -a, -/ 6-4 4? i,iiil _tAti,leJii ___ ___ .A.,?-4 4 .,.t. , I.—A o„uu-14-e)---,L.: __61,--/-__D 4 A _______ ________ Ct/ ., _41?call,p1,*(nn kit)-'/At UJ--t 64, ---e0-9-k.-1---): ------ - 0 '-_VAS ,/`-t;w` —it ._______________2,._T4-4 _J-t4.-4 _CLC4-11,Vttid___ '__Ap,a/Arkta .17I--17 _____ ____MN) 4-Z-LZ. r7ktirk-i- . : _T/1/11, , .4)011-°11_11, • . ______745. _.(y-AA4.14A44.L. _ ___ __0_,_ . i.),. ._____u',..4,_ ti�},._ ______ .,__ fj W__-%tt p IJ / _____ _ . (A,4 441/4 ZP _--tom- LevP/4 _____ AsitAd4,1- _.JA-_eit ii!_4_v_41___4A____ __Ip. _lz._- liiii-if,(2, re/;./vi-ii, _ .,._-_ -') ( t ' 1.-- - - P'JM __ _ / ,., . , t2 u ._-- - ------ __-- _ _____w_144i- 41,-at,cf,t __tp4'o.1/. N-e_ it, cir,,,,,,,,t6r7I-e-, t,/_ __.1, ,:,4 _4,c,itt ,, i_,, ' utitict,u.clj/vAivL. 0(4 r-k..44 (1.J ' p _____ /v44,1,1_4-,74 ___ _ _ _ :_e\_ - tic, ____ ___ _ p..- --6_,:4-5 litict, __.,&, .4./ti,t./.) _ .___-__L-__+_t_40 a-- __ __62-{,4/...-__,_Q/t-14,1_1_,A,tv-a OA- ....71-a <1.4/_14.A4,7,4_,--r---_ ' _ ceA,--gc,k,. ___ 1_-?Th_o____ ____A Ir /fer-- --- ---Artlk--4 -4-c-4--- �� C (- Mr. Mike Franzen City Planner 4111 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN. Dear Mr. Franzen, My name is James Connelly. I am Vice President of a small chain of video retail stores, d.b.a. Panorama Video. We have six stores in the western market area, our original store is still located in Eden Prairie, in the mall next to Rainbow Foods. We have operated our business in Eden Prairie for more than six years in the same location. This year we will pay over $19, 188.00 in real estate taxes on the space we rent. I trust our video competition in the Eden Prairie market area, is faced with the same tax challenges per square foot. In short, I feel Panorama pays its fair share of taxes, and has been a solid Eden Prairie citizen to boot. I was not made aware until yesterday, April 7, that the city is considering re-zoning a unit of property at the corner of Highway 5 and County Road 4, for the construction of a free standing Blockbuster Video store. Needless to say I have objections to such a proposal. Let me tell you up front, that I fully intend to compete with Blockbuster in all parts of the western metro market area. They opened a store less than 300 feet from our location in Uptown, and we have remained very successful, much to their dismay. Blockbuster petitioned the city for sign ordinance changes, so as to use their large ticket logo. The city denied their sign request, because Panorama and other Uptown retailers had been previously turned down for sign size and positioning changes. On a410 level playing field, locally owned video retailers can compete with Blockbusters out of state marketing machine. When the city makes specific concessions for Blockbuster that it won't make for its own local merchants, then the competitive game is tilted in their favor. Another point needs to be made clear. There are currently six video retailers within approximately three miles of the location in question. There is no doubt in my mind, that two of these locations will close, should Northco/Blockbuster be given the variance requested. I think we would all agree, that there is already enough vacant retail space available in Eden Prairie. I doubt that your tax base would care for more. I fully expect Blockbuster to open in Eden Prairie. Our company had the Blockbuster franchise at our Eden Prairie location until November of 1991. Blockbuster Corporate knows what I know, and that's that Eden Prairie is a great city and terrific market area. Yet, I ask that you not give Blockbuster any considerations not given to local merchants. That goes from zoning changes to signing variances. I have repeatedly asked the Welsh Corporation, owner of the Prairie Center mall on Prairie Center Drive (where we have our store) to petition the city for changes to the "street side" sign that identifies the mall location. I have been told time and again that the city of Eden Prairie would not allow a more dominate, noticeable mall/retailer signpost. I trust you will take the same position with Blockbuster. I have seen the size of their sign lettering and their pole with ticket logo. If the city approves their format, I will be the first to come to you along with my legal council, to petition a change for our store. What's good for one merchant, should be good for all. Allow me to conclude by saying that we have been a solid Eden Prairie 4111 business for many years. We have asked nothing of the city and expect to be a good neighbor. As a former city resident and current resident of Chanhassen, I ask that you flex no more for a group of out of state investors marketing an international franchise, than you would for the small business owner down the street. After all, it's not like they have a product that's not available elsewhere. Sincerely,7 1 --__ James Connelly - - Panorama Video 954 Prairie Center Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota April 9 , 1993 City Council Members City Of Eden Prairie • 7400 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Proposed Commercial Building site at Highway 5 and County Road 4 Northco-Blockbuster/Liquor Store; Dear Sir or Madam: My name is Thomas Lauby. I am President of Video Escape, located at the intersection of Highway 5 and County Road 4. This family owned video store has been at this intersection for the past eight (8) years and would like to continue to be in business for many years to come. A little background - Video Escape originally opened it ' s doors within the Prairie Village mall . It grew from a family oriented video store to a active community video store, sponsoring local sports teams and donating to social and school activities. After four (4) years located within the same mall , Video Escape requested Northco to approach the City of Eden Prairie concerning signage and positioning, two vital factors to any retail business . I was informed by Northco that the City of Eden Prairie would not approve signage for the outside of the building . At that time I was informed that the liquor store was also concerned with signage and positioning, as they made a • similar request for a free standing building within the Prairie Village Mall parking lot . It is my understanding that the City of Eden Prairie denied this request due to limited parking . Shortly thereafter, our lease was due to be renewed and we were forced to make a decision whether to stay at our present location with bad positioning and no street signage, or move to a new location with street signage and the possibility of the liquor store soon following our lead . This was an obvious decision to us . Unfortunately, three (3) years have past and the liquor store still remains within Prairie Village Mall . Recently, I became aware that the lease for the liquor store was due for renewal and the City of Eden Prairie opened bidding for a new lease location . I understand that Northco/Prairie Village Mall and L.A. Donney/Prairie Court Mall have each submitted a bid. According to my informatiqn, Northco ' s bid was not a formal bid, but a letter stating they would match L.A. Donney ' s bid . If this information is correct, Northco ' s bid is incomplete and it is my belief, as well as several other business owners, that it should not be considered a formal bid and L.A. Donney should be awarded the lease agreement . v`1(. C (- Page Two 0 It is my opinion, as well as the opinion of several Eden Prairie business owner ' s , that the L.A. Donney/Prairie Court bid would be more beneficial to the City of Eden Prairie and all retail businesses located within Eden Prairie. Reason being that locating the liquor store in a mall atmosphere would increase traffic flow to said mall and create the opportunity for additional small businesses to move into existing empty retail space, which would increase tax income for the city. I sincerely believe in and support the small business owner. Eden Prairie has always been a city where the small business owner can thrive and prosper due to loyal patronage. I hope it remains the same in years to come. Thank you for giving me the time and consideration to voice my concerns regarding this matter . Yours truly, Thomas A. Lauby Video Escape 16366 Wagner Way . .- Eden Prairie, MN 55346 41) TL/tk City of EP • � . tL)); ete.,. e k_e...t, ti s 4-r-e -,i, 4...2,,j5 L-..(i--. 01--1,:,- c - _ ilCurtit0_ 070_4l n/ 3 --- 937. 32e .__ __________. _... ___ . iv-rfv-i 62 ,, ,_(/ Iv _ „.,_ ._ __ 7. -__7/ ,t,,,,,,,o, ____ __ _., 1 1 _ .(_-1__J/3.____. __. I Cal, eaML W73.1 Ra-iil,-:_/&,/v( ______9_ ?q_ -25 - - - _____ i___fN ____ a 5-ceo WooDcRe s7-pR _ z/q& : F97s e� in5 S74 3Y Gi. 44 fi 3 7M/__l T LOOS ►C)5 /1<P —8 71 So l_lau_e3 8933 2 `31 ULLc . 93/- I D 7 -4 r\6L4/+- rZ(..",......svc...„ 1‘...a..1\5 td3c,.. .e_i_/ can ci, i.\uL: _ - 10„...S Nisz 1'S_L _ ti , -3 - 1 005_ } r\{ \--\o\rrLS t %I° Lao Lcoet 1RI-ti git, 5 V 7- o 3s ei // - - - - _^_ i767o_S vg_zf J._8° 937/3a --- _._ -77,, /1e_, _G. ,,_.2d 93 7 - , 0 Z. ' ' 4'-9-kji 0 _ keY/4-___, NO 1 Qcia.„-r_)-7:-,_-_-_, -----i--3e:;:--13 Ilk -withal 44,44- LYô �1 ; CA - Piz =tz ._&ll (-4,i/b_44.-. ��_ [rC, k b.e,f- t ' 1— CLIC(49/dr,f‘ T' ev- 5 'se y, i t/#--- --/A1/21t / - 'P/ (b) 1 . SC4-%CCL CTelb e 4,Ec/ ,,- ,- , 9- \_Qc)_ \-,.cc,,,v, ---7(3---LN i....„.. ..)::_a_3.q Q pE±7_2(.2 1_77 a , T5. -/- 6 _ _ - cyli___ ___ . - • 9)-r7 - P-1- - -y:Ns _ _ - 'Q \,• _\\.\---- ____ __,,..!..---- • -\-\ - C_S--- ‘ _ jellit_A4 W4- 5'41(Y:ed2IZZ-e 62,k2a-iled .ii A K-'-t---'\°'1_A ' \ , -- -- —iur i �'1— --� rc un l ,{Lq 1 ( ei l \f ,ew cl ?_1`--- -- ---- --" !i ( ( i 0 , 1._ gct... L.t ,-,#.1 -rf tory\ ._ 191SO Home sreaJ _(;rce_e 937- 2i3 ? i N)'‘‘(0\- R-ec,v vi.‘_ck,v1 1.'zn ei.. --2- -?i-c_c",‘.S cktil C ,•J 7c2.c-I• 9. 37-ss-3•2_ . • 1pis acy; 1--- , ! 7, #77 9 7 ft ZeiVe Ae e e74q- '1-37.-- Yr iL , _ _ . ./.:_gicaza,r1)____ _ _-7,37g TaA,vm., Cvv, 0° ,z_ei-_,,_,_,-:i_!e_ 7.: 3,z.• de;,Z./.7._. Lie.2-.45c_f_____Pe-/- 71 - ii- ,5iicio.5c/ t'.., ....--- 3co-r iki.A./-0 Jaz 0 Li_____(\Ac_c_tak_lann,..e 1-/L-/ -536 7 Iz•ii „ . . , ! fat\, - „\\_. 0..::)( C.', A,..v.u..k '"-- ,----\ 6 11'.,. 44e ---el - ?0/ _.. ;.,,, AV .,. _,,_I / - 1,_ 1, I i 5 % id it ( '-' / I 3 -±cv.1---..../A,___ __a_\..,e. --/_1/2--- c 4A,L 1X04(1 , 6-41C01,1)J4 /6S-VC (ttegeAl Way 939-00.60 /7 C Li Cr— 1 t / _ . - --_-__!il.. t --i::/d°4p.) /4eF( 41.4 Dr___ iF6 ?-07 73 . t_o_ - 1J-iltq /‘_s--7( f_g__JekeY/4/. ..__,L. _ ? 3 7-2-7c/_ _____. / 1. GA- Afae--4\ C-A E.8 e'r%,t_ Xel.i 1.i C. fi-- 2-2-. --1_4_, _/____c_- __, dA,4ce___,M4f.dAt, 7177 /1 - 0(1; ---• 93 K—Ocz/ 3_ • 3,-\) q o-- cA,1/41. Um 9 LI, boLg' / /' ). -7_--?7. • _ cy' -a--_ _-__/z 93-7- 1--34/..s L Ali is 4 ,I1t-h0/V 71-6 7 / if/n / .Y?, ee., pop.le / J ica//o . . i:p.776op 3/ccJbus Urty, 77-e... hudio-)b si )(e Cv(`// ' aCCCisr 7 f_i_A nn aJ (G'ee ro o) Re 41/0__ /0 /7-y remd nk _po rosal_ 1 ___Ai__ UAm __ ASS _______________IA - ---_____-- - ;-3 ______ .. UA/Aa 0.-- - .-_-__RAP: _-_R __bilk_ 2c024 c. L M i-t q-Z2q _ Cm___._1• ' • �� Joi4LiL c(37-) 9 ----- cat., _.—c 3.- - 1.5 0,-,i_t i: 0 Ci qq-0-5-6ro- T .L1. cu 613 • 310_1._l���k,ti - _C, . .S-OIL--[ `z,C AS ` al7 Th-6 44=Ctii-e-' k,,2-7 0-7/0 ,.•0 cJ e S«,__-gi((5__r_h- 3C,k - y70 7- �, ,_ rnlint' 95Q/ CAe • 1/1/53/y -- - i-fick - --)66 ,-; .i_e q5 -71'7o do&l-4 -_- 937-29 -" . _I d 6(iss 62 Ae/iid_t _J.))) . . q,V- ,07/__4,_ ,2. fzeie /7vo ei i c-h- _Cc�c 22zul , _ 93V-Y/y ..j..:::--)::::;--_ ---- ,,,f4-1:--, 2.",:r‹..)_s--- A_4, /, q37-o7a-<' 5' • 14f.__ l-'-1-- -'-. J 7 cv ,I V,,,, ,_ S, et u�� C< 1- (/ .1_,S ,I.A44/ 7[, 5'3 r-Orjr? ID ci, W 70 i s --- ' f______6_,, 0 Y g 0 9 . LZ_ett,eui-Lba.e .-- ifo_e62_01_-4-_ _/.ad,r2-__67,2_,./rili --g v__-_ _0_,_,g/ j,,,,L,, a f�0_q8O_uuys-f, epi_gi 93 7-a 7/ __ fa �2 e 67 / -5 � 7_-�6o �.1. 4_ :.1 - / 6 6 `/___/4 . 4//cX rr�-t Cf. 93 if - 3 /i `!'� i '1 _ - • 93 ?-4 — - -�•- _.__ - -D _.. ---- ___ _- -�-e% 937 -/9 ��CG 2 T _ GtlGt.._ /7 c7/ _S. S1,oi-e /1.., 4) zf _ —_TgV - 3 3 . a /46 iS 4 1f/oD1 --/D Sf p Liz, &I i / )i176 c-r Ntk' n // a CCro ss /( lfiie- i/v Gvh,C/t 4, a/ccL&i jt • !Me toll zac. Qui/f • /)LFaJ lk/,o of i' A fl ii proposal. Su trapr-r fit,t14A. m 1 rp7a. 7Th • itlAirIE _ - - Ab SS _- ----- PhcmE -- _ • i:1--c:P.-y S ry it'/--i Co l 5-7 �c(r c a't r 4. )?of z. ' (` / 9/ 1: ('/'ff S-- Li-ersr,l cif 7 y E) `i.,' a - l 4 5 v, '. ) ) v '.:LAB n 4-Q. t hi o n _. _ __75 4- /1` -/A it.< 3 7 -J3 b. 6-Y-,-Ae$,. .4a-eel /C,376 ctii4G7,36e e<>6.w q3-7-__00 a_c2 /ilay & d/o a SD C,AAo Ccu eilah Ci,an h4s.@^ 9S 7_ 6 D-: Jeli ain ee_ 6 705 l6.81 - 934(772.5 i! h. ,,.1i. - -- . _ ___ _ _ __ 11/1-?Aq.r_4("&cr, ,, 6S(-(0 4-,/, 7?_ L.„i 5'3 V-6232_ _ __ __ , :::;A-4:'/ Z; _ ______ __ i-z-Z'e,)_ . _ g.3 7-„:5-...-.7 ..5-- 7 - 0 . 55A _ 11)-c 1-\'(\ Cf: ______930q4c _______--_----1 L ---------- —I q i_7 0= - - __ 4 L! �_'j ) I+40_ ..___ _ _ __. _761__ _,-3 _1_6-) a_r_s2__L--pck 93 7-0 (3_71-fx412-A ____7(,00_ •me___11.2-Avivt,e._______________ _(3- 3:___zz..?- 3 57._______ 2/ / - a32o waripi ukuj, _ _93q-IMCO __ _ ?I Ca4 t, e titt� -20(5. l' 11.687 /t,,(74.,(/ (id. _ 9N-43 r2- 141 Q "-f--OW-4- r' 440G 5 ia-\) u,c/vt , ---------------. j, n.rLf, - it�titsr rvv�� f l�.�1v_ lac c tit —qb`l"w z5-d----c,J_ _Axi _7-- -_-4,g,, d .______________ _92f7-_.59_,- ____. _ _ ________ ,. . -wry Wcoyvi& 15-70j. g( r leiiipr, _____ 3'-'1-Liqs 4_ _ .__ _ __ ___y_loir 1...ym-,_ isgo vi, laic W DM - 4949-_1,1__-_-.1:1Q___ - - -----...._ed 4c c na1 /�36 L�Q� ,, -?37_l Ste_ -- ,?- - z ---- ?S=- % cam- -- sY?- 2 683 - �► val\S --ti 1,{5 ._. .vr A.tr «anti A,..- _ - ,- i,,-t /--,el/GlIC—/ C I L''.... EficLI,Liji:ej, ?-1,beb --ID L bud"- 4.(C/C.I,(- --Ae ,17, tze_: (see /;z?) . • • H ,l'w3-6 /62-9; 6i/.. . 71.1 h at/ 1%) - /Awn t yq • ./. /ticezc_ 7(/&(6/.c_ __ ._..6 7.0 5-.6()_ /.6t -,i•A‘,7_ ___ _PJK .z1 ..________. a . /;2-e. -7;-- _Z-:-..:. /37-ft/c) _ __ ___ _ :_. ._._. i_ \ „ ___________---1---_ 22 -> 75:--e Rase t .P . - • ' 6/66 triots ccuvikti2Lc;t,„ (4 43 7-5;q9 7230 7"Topi'k4o(2fi 7/.., 9--5'y /,5zf 4-L_ /67.5) uue,"- &4-7-- 1.6? -. cf,i-1-0 J g/e,‘(- (MR vlikig_LieLC-.. liffeoe 7691 /kureLy,ei i At84_04,0bdiu ( 31 ( 5, 4 ; t1c1ps4 04- , • ci2q ---7? , - .1_50-LezzeiLiud ,3 ---VY3 1 La -- lq.LliLt-1/4-, W315 tsucii\c { v„eL,i 613-7 3(.3S _r_d,d, ..,v--,47,-- I ,.. _W__-_i__ ,14_ove4.01". 9 fc-96 31_ _ -- •-/1171calek &C4/ 7\a2e 40.24____ 9 37- 04.-S / - _; , 1)0"k _±_ Tg1:0614 il.... .. •f_r-xf. 160 E,71 1(1c / (3.7\ ___ 93--)_aG 9 1 . r - _ - 5__t3+__jk ,__C Wry LA • 410 - co 0 4-7 .. q)0 - - ---- • 1 C3\oc,(;v,S•F v" Q-a c_i !/ 6 .• I-f-. ?( k c t L. c�-c (n� -r-v\i S Pro pc, a i- 5�C M G p$ ,�,— �s in Pt_S�_ .`/ 11 Na rn-e__ • •i '' . 72O0 � - �,L- - q34^ / 73o E, -- 2� .. -79.Fa-�s a/L 4/ i. gCgb ),q,�c a;y ,�c,,D , Y1 -...? 3 7- . - - . ... - - / 7,77 ,,H0 d Gr 13Y- 3q ._ . ! T14 . _ rUlZt i G//(`��- nil. g7��33 _ r 'Joi a,Sah t // 7/( No - //lcreJ7` Cf SY 93 Y-SO3 li , N( c_ (S-N::(7--ay-1 z (: -6 -x-'- ,004zL. ci-sk q-z__ .._____. ____ ii / ,(AaiZci gddliAz. S' a2 (7SyP51,;4/el kr ' r's . 73 .-- 7752-7 ✓ V i .r. :c -- -- - Cci. 70 Cep a, et 93 -os S • ---------- I. . j844 d. - ZDO'_7-7517/tiyve -,e*'. 93 e/--0,39. -- -- --- 11 Nit , 4 / 3qi. Ofz,44,50,..71KX...__________ ____ _q _ aAtte,__ ----- --------ii -e44/164,-;14-L-, 4-1,te' ...__._/.7. .6o6d,teim_c_e_p_______._____93q.- 0173 _7)__ 041 _&, d,a41___________.:23.2 _,Pa,, ,,._,St._______._.______53 Y__--.1 V_// , _ -.1,(11._311_0Theic-f t'_.r______ Eo_ I y oylr____CI____________ 93-3::::_g_ I-) s__ 0 [ (c(oaD ./\) eA_C-,c) V 131 SZ(?( -__--_ „ -l_6 330 _ �l -_ __.-•� 3 _-- Y.g14- ._______ 1 \k-- ,7,_kart_d-k 17?..\\ 4,".Yr6 15 cio, tiJeg . ( c . J___ _ _ 6151 -ci* IDc(,---1 / e_165o Mn0,,.. p� ;ie -- — 9 37 • //o� '16_. cu P 3 °A.e. _ 93y-g4,9 • • 7777:5 -*S c /-- -'----i--;1:0--% 7/7' 5 itV/0 /7"4— e.,../ ..:, C-1/— GI j '4144// cd s s. tI, _ C 74-€...4- -.0.1_ 1.111 1 if" G+ bl- Z?vs,/.. v.;,40 - .e.,,,..// h, - . , . , ?....,,..//. p/,‘,6.,_._ kilf C.,5 61 AA 14)5 0 1'0/CA SC1• 6;e2— "Pt ars , IC 1.t-- :,-, 1 . uit_ 4.PPAESS 24,,on . , Iv , IfilFitt. N cto 60,edivep60-L_ -7"&a.:'? g,(..„..._ .-3 c(- 6 G _ _ 11(/)(JZ efa(4-74Apk, . __500_ 61/4. 6*._-; _ _• -_-__________--1' l _k 12_ uo_: .-.Tr. I cm-(-0313 . Int" 6(. 12,Q, keny-' ii a_7_41-3_01A/c-i6004 137- S_ \--\0,-zew,..-k- ----,-\- AA - Do , - /C 33 ce- EP 7- 1 • --1A . ..--! 15-3471 )i-alitw die EP g3-7-J9 ef'S- / (LP,o,s32_/./mi(V__Da.ay 20-2 ----- .!_krts- C-.J<t— i 1-7 2_,Y:b.___,,v._._“ jk 3 1 .c. 09 oi-54_—zYS7 9_Y9 o c.,,,, ._ LIT' idifaL1cL _____Sio.4i_e_..d_ect._Ei2 eqq -z0a7V ‘ .17- acie_____*ekcai_azo PT_A0_ di,e1k, 472._7.7_____ k210mazzy- eidc, /elk g•vii A 4/44)- ot . 1.. 47- 0/362 5Gli eA.cl 4.--vje4 licdv_kri 0 71i -c-v f;LI-- 000S" 1 '314017141 7() 4 e 6e. ,4 F37- 11,411.nii:e. -0-zi %15.1,),t4,/ILL 934-o/3.2, ! law^a /cao g#0.__ aj pi'h 61 vd e Nag , f:4&._"1..V.,--.Jr• 7:,,p,i -thiR 7023 C Ll etlkt Ecri'I _g_3A.-- 3,-5 7 3___ q3ce-0 (4 __ ___ \i9litAkoAt‘lco(A.ISki. iggl 0 Rfky. I.ACQ_210( c??1 -- 2-q- • ‘-Ptiee : zeip"71; -n-Z-l( i''s* ;61:-/t :,' .:ci iicC V 4°L -Lce//o_S("t tg.,;j2:-: •-::Gir--/- . 1G 44.-,„ _.•,.., : 4/AME.7- XDPez: __71(6A)E 1 -CS wjaik--- -- _14 (/ / " iitt Gz Si . h/4 1,6 ...it------;; L: _ _ -- ,e0- 9(k.Cce. - 7--- 3 97 2•--- 5_52_9- 9_3 - .932- ,..? 1._7/ 3 7 - _____y/ 1-.0aiz,b__ Leil — 905--7-7... ,,„ _,.C16 • Pil Vu4-k-PA 9 35- 1-/a7-(to ' ._ i_Jeeil 1 q3‘7- - 05-7-t _.i ' _ _47_1_g_ttill q Li? -h573 - . --- 3(f-- yri-- _ttcl , q37-6311, ____ --- lid A -1- //7-1 0 ---------, — 4110_. _____ — 1 — j',1) . . •- e --. -----' - . • Vis is c - AA-bai A -/ty azi-,V= JI90 7i-xe. /a-044521 40 4_ Doclthliki/ Uthiw aceArd,. P4e 1/Ae_01 01- ?remt, 0(114,e__inc.i6 akked26 ,107f_-_-___760_ ____11,4 _koi.__-.626.41- lit. .( 74(01.4, L , ____e L.alk-u_:4 1+ ---• ---- e'y----- - -- ----i - -___ i . P _II -DAtAbtst+Ylo m.r, . LP 52v _ _ FIP - Na_rf.e_ ProtAre_s 5. IN('11-\. ... -It 77.4e/e c-fv.,-,7-?-c- 7 LA,.1,&•-p ,314—Y,5:51.? I cr n i'ckol; L 1 1 1 122LA-Acis4- e kit.24f: /,0 S 9-C I g Zi 3 CI?aek-b-ke_C.k__ 111.41 SO, SI-13e-E. Ccele• l>),„., qtt__33 q,e 2/4,:el" 5375"cio C-A. I q/ .e..,1- 4 col LA5a,__45teer2 1 / .62(112 (k-5--c' ?--.01. I 0\ Z 7 ciJ tli;c6AA 1-, it/teq; mot t,..,_(,7t2. - 4 t-- C.;t 1 3 I -c 1c3 LIM-6-Jac --2` `(() tilli:L2f- CA-Cit\_____Lk 33I-4" as(4) 74.___/31, VL / • :I AV (7-r 1(.09 5 i4- -S . lid,-- V WAAJO-(-J 14 377 -/-4/071,4 De... q.1- - 644Z / 4'i:: . • ..1/„ ,4,,, , s . • .., ni--Funn_ingri I/8-0 Pczglig4v_i_z2 . 9 -.L__/25/ , ..,. . , _ ..;:fb-'_ P.,1 • / graL..../s, , of„c,A irtio--26 /q • _ i 71)1 • _.1., , ifre . el T ig? .46amee_'--- I tik ___ _____*;_/ ‘ ,,, 6tak C ii nae-, 2).T7 /gct, ii 9 . . 1,i7c)4. m,4111.5 p. I k:,,t, -( 4-- . '- 1 e.,‘ e_ tx e 1 p til;I°I to4mo. AppeEss _ p)-(0,t) .- -1-- 41110________L: 6?f 411,6 g P. 931.--/6, O _ I de/7-41ile_ckeviii(-. 7 me'ci E,p___ ty-0203,3 . 6 (131_91S2-1___ 2 V -,-/ LP ;,t. a/ 0 r 37_21 j5;67 . •-/37- 4 ,3.3 .-? p _i3gWtrlew E-i. g3e7-- .364-7 • fil- j 90, ilrli3O___e_r_______P c/-c=2462_ 9_.J/ __. LIS (_OLA_40 ---7 140 6 77 co-t dizro jq Tif.c( I .9 J 17--osio s--- 47,/ (3,-id 4,-k. s. 91 Li-4,3,---b 1U%- --tL. li7 I d 0 T , v)* it_r4 i 6 D.t•il M 1/6P (-rA(A,L. • CI 3 7 (..k V; 1-- r .7(0_2I.c,12a. 4.4e-r-1-- LI -• • liaola 0 vacc_o _____Q2451OyiricAad 5-) . clifil:313_ ILISthiLSh n [ 1 lU-140 Sb hDliciin Cha\AJ (00)ArryCau BVDH C0W-k- aku b>22ef-I 04,-,...) IN\1\cc. IS 6 n il,,4-4irt. N . Y\k_cm-O le.._ , " Lniciditmo-jA, 744(1 PetrAcA_Vi 5T1-12:15-- q00 (k k i r\- 01 '.-7 67.-/g/r /---- --, - ld y I We ,r 4 P-/7 - ori9 k,-__ 0 • _ L obi, ifr...Ati. 15 8 85 ct Rd 14) Umtr,w4 955.- QZ-ia -5,-(r (1kAvv_A-i\cW_6\ CO3); teI5,L (0 3;722 II -/-4:--9- --- , _ 4-4150 tor' i4v,„ L.) gig - „IT': • - ----- - • • g, w) ac4jo-y\Jwj\ -oi (LF---(035, _ Ticid (3/L 75( ect PFlic 41(64 -f- P4 D-7 ?351----/3gc) 111- 0 i(cnr7cr q±Li5ekin 'iters nc)-- _t_a___/1(at_4•w -67. ould .p 41t5 -Z° r •/„ W77;Ax C.P. V0N rzlsz___ 06ecA._ 7X3 9 - Gss • • • SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC. • GERALD M. SUNDE, Consulting Engineer 9001 East Bloomington Frwy. • Bloomington, MN 55420 • (612)881-3344 April 7, 1993 Mr. Bruce Carlson _ NORTHCO CORPORATION 1201 Marquette Avenue, Suite 110 Minneapolis, MN 55403-2461 Re: Prairie Village Mall - Blockbuster Video/Eden Prairie Liquor Dear Mr. Carlson: One purpose of this letter is to request that Northco Corporation fill out and submit the enclosed Minnesota Department of Transportation Application for Drainage Permit. The permit has been filled out in entirety and simply requires the applicants signature. Please sign • this permit application and forward same as stated with the enclosed Hydrologic Computations. An informational sheet regarding MnDOTs requirements for the project is also enclosed. The second purpose for this letter is to inform you of the drainage system being proposed for the above said development. Please refer to the enclosed letter to Kathy Anderson, KKE Architects dated April 5, 1993 for background information regarding this issue. There are several items which I would like to bring to your attention regarding the proposed grading and drainage plan. First, due to the discharge rate control requirements it will be necessary to pond stormwater temporarily on the site during precipitation events. The areas affected by this stormwater storage are the areas behind the proposed building and the catchbasin areas to the west and east of the proposed building. The drainage system is designed to store a minimum 10 year event with overflow in all areas occurring at an 887.5 elevation. The proposed building floor elevation is 888.8. Ponding will occur to the 887.5 elevation resulting in up to 0.6' deep standing water impacting up to 6 stalls and up to 1.1' deep standing water immediately adjacent to the catchbasins in the drive isles. It is very important that the overflow elevations are installed properly during construction and that this is field verified. The overflow locations should also be kept free of landscape materials or other obstructions during the life of the project. • r r Page 2 Mr. Bruce Carlson • April 7, 1993 With a drainage system such as this it is increasingly important that the system be well maintained to keep the system operating efficiently with a minimum of impact to the operations. Storm sewer catchbasins, manholes and grates should be kept clean and free of leaves and debris. Please feel free to call and discuss the situation with us if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC. Rick Schuller, EIT enclosures cc: Kathy Anderson, KKE Dave Olson, City of E.P. • Mike Franzen, City of E.P. Bob Obermeier, Watershed District • "E G 1 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner Chris Enger, Director of Planning SUBJECT: Changes Which Should Be Made to the Current Ordinance on Trash Enclosures to Screen Trash Areas More Effectively DATE: April 23, 1991 RECOMMENDATIONS In order to provide for better screening of trash areas, the current City code could be amended to include: 1. Site planning standards for screening of trash and recyclable materials; 2. Trash enclosure size, design and location standards. Site Plan Standards for Screening of Trash and Recyclable Materials 1. For single use commercial buildings, all trash and recyclable materials should be located within the building. (See Example 1) An alternate would be to locate trash and recyclable materials within a completely enclosed accessory structure close to service doors. This approach would require the trash area to be located within a garage with access by overhead door. (See Example 2) 2. For medium and small shopping centers up to 50,000 square feet, trash and recyclable materials should be located within the building consolidated at the ends of the building with an interior access to the enclosures. (See Example 4) 3. For large shopping centers in excess of 50,000 square feet which could be designed with more than one building, all trash and recyclable materials should be located within a screened service court. This would be similar to the loading area at the City offices. An alternate would be a combination of#2 for the small tenants and #1 for the large tenants. (See Example 3) • ,ALC) Trash Enclosure Memo 2 May 15, 1991 • Trash Enclosure Size, Design and Location Standards 1. For general commercial uses, the amount of space required would be based on a ratio of one square foot of enclosure for every 38 square feet of building. 2. For restaurants: 144 square feet must be designated for trash, and 144 square feet for recycling. 3. The location of the trash enclosure must have easy access and sufficient maneuvering room for trash hauling vehicles. There should be a minimum of 16' wide drive aisle with sufficient maneuvering to accommodate up to a 34' length vehicle. 4. For trash and recycling areas located inside of the main building, the interior walls should be masonry construction or poured concrete. The interior area must be sprinkled, heated, ventilated and provided with a floor drain. Access to trash enclosures should have doors with locks approved by the Police department. 5. Accessory structure trash and recycling enclosures must be constructed of exterior 4110 materials required by code for the main building and have a roof. The building should be designed to be architecturally integral with the main building. Structures should be located within the rear yards and meet setbacks to property lines. 6. Recycling materials should be stored in a separate enclosure next to the trash enclosure. This makes pickup convenient for the haulers and helps keep cost down. If these enclosures are located too far apart, it requires more time to pick up materials and these increased labor costs are passed on to the tenants. 7. For long commercial strip centers, enclosures should be located at both ends and in the middle to make access easier for tenants. This will help minimize trash/recycled materials being stored outside a tenants rear exit. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE CURRENT ORDINANCE ON TRASH ENCLOSURES? Free-standing dumpsters and containers are now allowed as proper treatment for storage of trash. The current practice of administration of the ordinance is to require that the dumpsters and containers be screened within an outside enclosure, within a building, or behind a screen wall. The City has relied upon the commercial developers to determine the space, design and location of the enclosure. After reviewing trash enclosures at twelve commercial centers and six restaurants, staff has observed that providing a screened area does not guarantee that the dumpsters and recycling materials will be stored within the enclosure. • Idumpster p Yer overhead door recycling vi.wi.,,iiriemwziirarmr. dumpster 414.1`81 , Ell/ ' recycling tenant `� _ 7w t J ()/ tens i t ,.d��,lT7U1P111�ii_l. rtt�u�«ter, Accessory 1 Trash Inside 2 Building • Screen Wall cnLarkOng Internal Service Corridor I , dumpster r____1 0 c0o recycling dumpster overhead door / /171///1/# -r--- 1 -,,.....r D tenant 1,L... '''--.1 i. Loa I oE5� recycling __ _ ill Screened Infernal 3 Service Court 4 t _ Access Trash Area Dumpster Chesnut Place .414a**) Trash & rea On Lakes Cento z Trash Are rueK ezezz ® Dumps • Trash Area LocatIons Trash Enclosure Memo 3 • May 15, 1991 To understand why trash is being stored outside of enclosures, staff consulted with commercial developers, architects, other communities and trash haulers. The main reasons for trash being stored outside of enclosures are: 1. Space: Trash areas are too small and older commercial areas did not plan - for recycling. 2. Location: Trash enclosures are located in areas that are difficult to access, and it is more convenient to leave the dumpster outside of the enclosure. 3. Design: Trash enclosure designs do not accommodate trash vehicles - gate openings are too small, and it is hard for trucks to maneuver close to the dumpsters. 4. Management: Commercial projects with adequate space, good location and design can still have trash stored outside of enclosures due to inadequate • pickup or tenants piling trash outside of the enclosure. TRASH ENCLOSURE CRITERIA Staff consulted with architects, commercial developers and trash haulers to determine what standards would help ensure that trash would be properly stored within enclosures. Following is a discussion of standards for space, location and design. Space It is important that trash enclosures be sized according to the volume of refuse expected by providing room for recycling containers, general refuse and trash compactors. According to commercial developers, tenant needs vary so much in commercial centers that it is difficult to precisely pre-estimate the amount of trash area needed. The size of the trash area proposed is often based on the developers best guess of future needs based on past experience. This can lead to problems in the future if tenants have a greater demand. • Trash Enclosure Memo 4 111) May 15, 1991 Trash haulers, recycling companies and architects generally agree that 144 square feet of trash storage is needed for every 20,000 square feet of general retailing. If provisions for recycling are included, the size of the space should be doubled to 288 square feet in order to provide for separate ninety gallon containers for corrugated paper, glass, tin and plastic. This would be a ratio of one square foot of enclosure required for every 69 square feet of building (1:69) for trash storage. For trash and recycling, the ratio would be one square foot of storage for every 38 square feet of building (1:38). Staff has reviewed twelve shopping centers within Eden Prairie, and only four provide space according to this standard. For restaurants, the minimum amount necessary for trash is 144 square feet. With recycling, the space should be doubled to 288 square feet. Staff has reviewed six restaurants, and only one provides space according to this standard. Location Access to dumpsters must be easy for trash haulers. BFI and Aagard Sanitation have indicated that a 16' wide access drive is needed for vehicles up to 34' in length which would allow for 40 rollout, front or rear end loading of dumpsters. Each of the twelve centers surveyed provide access drives between 24-34' in width. The difficulty is that many of the trash enclosures are located perpendicular to the access drive which makes maneuvering difficult or possible. (See Figure 1). In this situation, a dumpster must be rolled out of the enclosure into the drive aisle. This extra step for trash removal often causes trash haulers to leave the dumpster in a more convenient location. This occurs at Anderson Lakes Center and Chestnut Place. BFI, Aagard, and Waste Management have indicated that trash haulers require a 9' minimum gate opening with 10' being desirable. In several of the shopping centers, the gate opening is 8'. This means that the trash vehicle cannot maneuver close enough to the dumpster. The dumpster must be rolled out of the enclosure. Design The length and depth of the trash enclosure space is important. A long and narrow enclosure requires dumpsters to be stacked behind each other which results in additional work in maneuvering for the trash hauler. In these situations, many times, one of the dumpsters is left outside of the enclosure. Long and narrow trash enclosures are found at Tower Square, Anderson Lakes Center, Lund Center and Crossroads. The enclosure should be designed wide Trash Enclosure Memo 5 • May 15, 1991 enough to stack dumpsters side by side. For example, if 200 square feet is necessary for trash enclosures, the trash area should be 20' wide and 10' deep. Snow removal is a problem for tenants and trash haulers. If snow is not effectively removed in a timely manner or not removed at all, it is difficult for the trash haulers to gain access. Trash haulers have suggested that a roof over the enclosure would eliminate the snow problem. A roof would eliminate water in containers which makes containers heavier and more difficult to empty for the trash haulers. Management Management can overcome inadequacies in terms of space, design and location. An example would be Shady Oak Center where the trash enclosures are located within the building towards the rear. It is inconveniently located for tenants and trash haulers; however, adequate space is provided. Staff visited this site on several occasions, and with one exception, all dumpsters were located within the enclosure. On the other hand, adequate space, good design, and good location can be destroyed by poor management. An example of this would be Ciatti's restaurant. Poor • management results in a problem which is an enforcement problem for the City which can be continuous and time consuming. COMPARISON OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO TRASH ENCLOSURE CRITERIA Staff analyzed six restaurants and twelve retail shopping centers to see how they compare with the trash enclosure criteria for space, location, design and management. Following is a list of observations according to trash enclosure criteria. Space 33% of the shopping centers provide the recommended amount of space for storage of trash and recycling. These are: Lund Center, Tower Square, Shady Oak Center and Anderson Lakes Center. 17% of the restaurants provide the recommended amount of space for storage of trash and recycling. Location 17% of the shopping centers have trash and recycled material located in areas which are easily accessible by trash haulers. These are: PDQ and Lund Center. 0, +nay Fi / , Trash Enclosure Memo 6 41) May 15, 1991 Design 17% of the shopping centers have good trash enclosure design. These include: Lund Center and PDQ. 83% of the trash enclosures at shopping centers are poorly designed. Gate openings are too narrow for a trash vehicle to access a dumpster. Trash enclosures are Iong and narrow which requires dumpster to be stacked behind each other instead of side by side. Management 50% of the shopping centers have a trash problem. An additional 17% of the shopping centers have a potential trash problem. 17% of the restaurants have a trash problem. An additional 33% of the restauran*7. ave a potential trash problem. HOW WILL THESE GUTDELINES WORK WITH EXISTING CENTERS? • 66% of the existing commercial centers, and 83% of the existing restaurants do not meet the space requirements. Many sites are built at the code minimum, and commercial centers and restaurants have little room to expand. It may be necessary for the City to consider setback or parking variances to encourage people to recycle and screen trash and recycling areas. HOW MUCH DO TRASH ENCLOSURES COST? An enclosure area for trash and recycling inside a building would cost approximately S55 per square foot. An accessory structure would cost approximately $25 per square foot. The cost of a trash enclosure area for a typical commercial building represents approximately 'A% of the total cost of the building. If additional trash enclosure area is added (according to recommendations), the cost would increase to 3/4% of the total building cost. The average cost increase to construct additional enclosure area to meet the standard is 25%. SUMMARY Trash areas can be better screened by implementing any of the four site plan standards listed in the beginning of the report. These include locating trash inside the building, accessory garages, screened service courts and internal access. • Trash Enclosure Memo • May 15, 19917 Trash enclosure size, design and location standards should also be adopted. These standards will provide enough room for trash and recycling in areas convenient for tenants and easily accessible for trash haulers. Tables 1 and 2 on the following pages provide a comparison of restaurants and shopping centers to trash enclosure criteria. c:trashmem • • • TABLE ONE - SHOPPING CENTER SITE ANALYSIS SPACE REQUIRED BLDG TRASH (S.F.) .. . IS SHOPPING SIZE AREA :.. TRASH A CENTER (S.F.) PROPOSED TRASH RECYCLING SPACE LOCATION DESIGN MGMT COMMENTS PROBLEM ANDERSON 21,500 325 155 312 MEETS POOR POOR POOR This is an example of adequate space but poor design, location YES LAKES and management. Two of the seven dumpsters are located in the CENTER planned area behind a screen wall. The rest are immediately adjacent to tenant rear exits. There are six different trash contractors, meaning management has left trash removal responsibility to the tenant. CHESTNUT 8,160 100 59 119 LOW- POOR POOR POOR When dumpsters are located inside the building, this project is YES PLACE MEETS clean; however, the trash area proposed is reduced somewhat by joint use as a mechanical room. Inside enclosures are located at the ends of the building. Trash haulers cannot directly access dumpster. All dumpsters are located in the parking lot. CROSSROADS 27,700 360 200 401 LOW- POOR POOR GOOD This is a situation where management compensates for poor NO MEETS location and design. The center is not fully leased, and problems may occur in the future. LARIAT 22,000 160 160 318 LOW- POOR POOR POOR This is an example where there is not enough interior room for YES CENTER MEETS recycling. As a result, trash and recycling containers are stored outside. The center is seeking a variance to build an accessory structure for trash and recycling. LUND CENTER 15,000 250 109 399 LOW- GOOD GOOD GOOD This is the best example of trash enclosure with good size, NO MEETS location and design. PDQ 10,000 120 69 138 LOW- GOOD GOOD GOOD Trash enclosure is in rear yard and not visible from adjoining NO MEETS streets. PRAIRIE 63,000 320 456 913 LOW POOR POOR GOOD This is an example of good management compensating for inadequate NO VIEW CENTER space, poor location and poor design. Dumpsters are located inside the building with access by overhead door. PRAIRIE 40,000 400 289 579 LOW- GOOD GOOD GOOD This is an example of dumpsters located behind a building. YES VILLAGE MEETS Adjoining residential areas are screened by berming. Good MALL maneuvering for trash vehicles. PRESERVE 40,000 450 289 579 LOW- GOOD GOOD GOOD This is an example where building and berming not only screen YES MALL MEETS dumpster but the entire loading area as well. Dumpsters conveniently located near tenant rear doors. 1 SHADY OAK 18,000 300 130 260 MEETS POOR POOR GOOD Good management compensates for poor design and poor location. NO CENTER Dumpsters are located inside of building with access by overhead door. Overhead doors are located on the sides and not visible from the front of the building. TOM THUMB 15,000 150 109 218 LOW- POOR POOR POOR One dumpster is located in an accessory structure behind the NO MEETS building and another dumpster outside. This dumpster is supposed to be inside the building with access by overhead door. TOWER 60,794 1000 440 880 MEETS POOR POOR GOOD This is an example of adequate size but poor design and location. NO SQUARE The center is only partially leased, so problems may not be ) apparent until later. Trash enclosures are visible from Prai • Center Drive. • 41111 • :.TABLE 2 - RESTAURANT SITE ANALYSIS BLDG. SIZE TRASH AREA SPACE REQUIRED (S.F.) PROPOSED IS NAME (S F ) SPACE LOCATION DESIGN .MGMT COMMENTS TRASH A TRASH ::: RECYCLING PRQBLFM ARBY'S 3400 100 144 288 LOU GOOD GOOD 000D, Trash is stored inside building NO with access by overhead door. BURGER KING 4000 120 144 288 LOU GOOD GOOD GOOD Trash is stored within an NO accessory structure. Bread racks, milk cases frequently stored outside of structure. CHI CHI'S 7400 120 144 288 LOU G000 GOOD G00D Trash is located inside of NO building with access by overhead door. Trash vehicle can back directly to overhead door. CIATTI'S 7000 180 144 288 LOU-MEETS GOOD GOOD POOR Trash area is an accessory YES structure. Trash overflows enclosure. Trash and recycling stored outside. L -- HARDEES 4000 200 144 288 LOU-MEETS GOOD POOR GOOD Trash is located within an NO accessory structure. Gate ' openings too small. MCDONALD'S 4500 324 144 288 MEETS GOOD POOR GOOD Trash is stored inside in NO accessory building with access by swinging door. Wide maneuvering area for trash vehicle. Gate opening too I narrow. MAY 4,1993 10741 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 11.98 10742 BRIAN BLANCH CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT 175.00 10743 ,ARP/55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 136.00 0744 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER CONFERENCE LODGING-POLICE DEPT 469.01 745 MN ASSOC FOR CRIME VICTIMS CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 100.00 746 MINNESOTA COMMERCE DEPT NOTARY COMMISSION FEE-COMMUNITY 40.00 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 10747 JEANNES TRAVEL INC CONFERENCE AIRFARE-FIRE DEPT 243.00 10748 ORDWAY MUSIC THEATRE TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 232.75 10749 PETTY CASH-COMMUNITY CENTER POSTAGE-SUMMER PROGRAM BROCHURE 10.60 10750 THANE HAWKINS POLAR CHEVROLET 1 TON 4X4 VEHICLE-SEWER DEPT 14579.00 10751 MN SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE CONFERENCE-FORESTRY DEPT 140.00 10752 CITY OF RICHFIELD MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION 18.50 10753 JUSTIN CHESNEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 14.00 10754 JORDAN CUSHING REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING 77.00 10755 PAUL DIEDRICH REFUND-FUN STATION/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 14.00 10756 GORDON FRAYNE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 9.00 10757 JANET FUCHS REFUND-ADULT TENNIS LESSONS 21.00 10758 BARBARA GILBERT REFUND-DRAWING & PAINTING CLASS 20.00 10759 ALICE GOULET REFUND-GLITZY SWEATSHIRTS CLASS 6.50 10760 KAREN HENNING REFUND-FUN STATION/CIRCUS PIZZA TRIP 14.00 10761 MARY JAEGER REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS 21.00 10762 TRACY JOHNSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 12.00 10763 MAGDALEN MILLER REFUND-GLITZY SWEATSHIRTS CLASS 6.50 10764 PAT MINGEE REFUND-ADULT GOLF LESSONS 42.00 10765 MERRY JO MITCHELL REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS 24.00 10766 PHIL MYERS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.00 10767 DIXIE QUINN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.00 10768 BETTY PEDERSON REFUND-GLITZY SWEATSHIRTS CLASS 6.50 769 KEN PRITCHETT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.00 70 KAREN SCHIEMO REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 15.00 771 JENNIFER SEMOTUK REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS 42.00 10772 WANDA STANS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 36.00 10773 ELAINE WILLIAMS REFUND-DRAWING & PAINTING CLASS 20.00 10774 CITY OF RICHFIELD DUPLICATE PLATES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6.00 10775 AT&T SERVICE 58.36 10776 AT&T CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIV SERVICE 175.04 10777 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE 99.76 10778 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 22358.45 10779 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 75.00 10780 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS 105 PAGERS-$25799/90 CASES-$1089/105 42916.36 CHARGERS-$9421/BATTERIES/105 REEDS-$3675- POLICE DEPT 10781 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT/COMMUNITY 40.00 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 10782 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 10783 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 50.00 10784 MN PARK SUPERINTENDENTS ASSN MEETING EXPENSE-PARK MAINTENANCE 20.00 10785 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR POSTAGE METER-CITY HALL 8000.00 10786 JIM ENNIS CABINETS CHECKOUT COUNTERS/BOTTLE RACK-LIQUOR STORE 2957.00 10787 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 2428.38 10788 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 12656.98 10789 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR & WINE 29131.53 10790 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 319.00 10791 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR & WINE 11618.93 41Ik951213 9 MAY 4,1993 10792 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 2810.51 10793 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR & WINE 6404 10794 THE WINE COMPANY WINE 9 10795 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE 76. 10796 STACY LIBSOCK REFUND-ADULT SWIMMING LESSONS 20.00 10797 CARLSON SYSTEMS CORPORATION LADDERS/STEP LADDERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 537.70 10798 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 32.00 10799 EDINA S W PLUMBING INSTALLED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE-HOMEWARD 165.50 HILLS PARK 10800 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING FORMS-POLICE DEPT/FLYER-SPECIAL EVENTS 969.20 PROGRAM 10801 BARKER & HERBERT ANALYTICAL SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 330.00 10802 HOMETOWN INN SCHOOL LODGING-FIRE DEPT 67.22 10803 OPTIMIST CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE OPTIMIST SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT-SPECIAL 4200.00 EVENTS & TRIPS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 10804 K G MENS STORE JACKETS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 233.94 10805 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL SAFETY TRAINING SCHOOL-SAFETY DEPT 320.00 10806 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP MIX 72.30 10807 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 8574.80 10808 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER & MIX 12461.60 10809 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 90.05 10810 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER & MIX 9596.22 10811 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIC 565.85 10812 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 169.70 10813 POGREBA DISTRIBUTING INC BEER 358.40 10814 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER & MIX 17066.60 10815 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE - 1397.90 10816 CITY OF RICHFIELD TAX EXEMPT PLATES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 21111 10817 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-MAY/JUNE SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER 15310, 10818 LORI PRICE REFUND-ADULT GOLF LESSONS 37.00 10819 PEGGY TRAGER REFUND-ADULT SWIMMING LESSONS 23.00 10820 LAURA WISNESKI REFUND-WATERCOLOR WORKSHOP 17.00 10821 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 774.44 10822 WATERPRO 96 5/8X3/4 100 GAL METERS-$4986/96 6624.00 COPPERHORNS-WATER DEPT 10823 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH APPLICATION FEE FOR PERMIT FOR WATER MAIN 150.00 IMPROVEMENTS 10824 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY APPLICATION FEE FOR PERMIT FOR SANITARY 240.00 SEWER EXTENSION-COUNTY RD 18 10825 OHLIN SALES INC CHARGER-POLICE DEPT 26_88 10826 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 52.75 10827 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 04-16-93 SAVINGS BONDS 450.00 10828 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 04-16-93 71651.11 10829 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 04-16-93 7680.00 10830 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 04-16-93 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 225.69 10831 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 04-16-93 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 280.00 10832 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 04-16-93 2918.46 10833 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 04-16-93 32.00 10834 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG APRIL 93 UNION DUES 1270.00 10835 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN INC MAY 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 18350.30 10836 MEDICA CHOICE MAY 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 44773.85 10837 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 04-16-93 298.00 108:38 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 04-16-93 5 10839 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 04-16-93 2 10840 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 04-02-93 & 04-16-93 1200. 0 22394633 MAY 4,1993 Il841 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA MAY 93 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 237.00 42 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 04-16-93 120.00 843 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 04-16-93 36553.77 10844 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 314.04 10845 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 190.33 10846 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR & MIX 5078.43 10847 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR & WINE 6912.24 10848 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO LIQUOR & WINE 8688.65 10849 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 564.40 10850 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR & WINE 2573.72 10851 NORCOSTCO PRISONER COSTUME RENTAL-POLICE DEPT 29.95 10852 RESOURCES & COUNSELING FOR THE AR CONFERENCE-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 21.00 10853 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER NOTARY COMMISSION SIGNATURE FEE-COMMUNITY 25.00 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 10854 NORWEST BANK HOPKINS PAYROLLS 12-11-92 & 12-25-92 1200.00 10855 JOHN K TEMAN AND JEAN M TEMAN INTEREST PAYMENT DUE FOR LAND PURCHASED 1788.01 10856 MOLLY KOIVUMAKI CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT 50.00 10857 JULIE MEINZER CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT 75.00 10858 JOYCE CONLEY CONFERENCE ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT 50.00 10859 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 16279.09 10860 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 265.00 10861 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER COSTUME RENTAL-SOCIAL PROGRAMS/TABLE ROLL 99.08 RENTAL-ICE SHOW-COMMUNITY CENTER 10862 ABBOTT PAINT & CARPET CO PAINT-WATER DEPT 238.99 10863 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC PRINTER CARTRIDGES-POLICE DEPT 411.63 10864 AIRLIFT DOORS INC DOOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 78.00 illip65 AIM ELECTRONICS INC DAKTRONICS HOCKEY SCOREBOARD NAME PANEL & 639.35 SPONSOR LOGOS-COMMUNITY CENTER Illiff866 AIRSIGNAL INC PAGER SERVICE-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/ 114.61 POLICE DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER 10867 AMERICAN AMUSEMENT ARCADES TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 282.23 FEES PAID 10868 AMERICAN RED CROSS LIFEGUARD TRAINING/TEXTBOOKS-POOL LESSONS 185.72 10869 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC CORNER PIECE/SNAPS-WATER DEPT 11.68 10870 AMERICAN PRO LINE MARKER-PARK MAINTENANCE 170.62 10871 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY COLORED COPY PAPER-CITY HALL 351.12 10872 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC BATTERIES/TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS-STREET 397.49 DEPT 10873 ANDON INC BALLOONS-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 27.59 10874 ANIMAL & BOARDING KENNEL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 27.69 10875 ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY NOZZLE/MOTOR VIBRATION REPAIRED-EQUIPMENT 3979.49 MAINTENANCE 10876 ATLAS FOUNDATION CO LOG SKIDDER RENTAL-FORESTRY DEPT 1700.00 10877 B & S INDUSTRIES INC BARRICADE TAPE-FIRE DEPT 141.38 10878 B & S TOOLS CABLE CUTTERS/SCREW STARTER-FIRE DEPT/ 317.96 WATER DEPT 10879 MICHAEL BARONE EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 27.75 10880 BARRY & SEWALL IND SUPPLY CO INC RUST PROTECTION-WATER DEPT 246.35 10881 S H BARTLETT COMPANY INC VALVE SEAT/STOP ASSEMBLY-COMMUNITY CENTER 45.63 10882 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC EDGER HANDLE/FLOAT SWITCH/COIL-ICE ARENA 239.25 10883 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MARCH 93 ANIMAL IMPOUND FEES-ANIMAL 398.00 CONTROL DEPT 084 BLUMBERG COMMUNICATIONS INC CABLE-POLICE DEPT 46.51 85 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE 808.05 10886 BUCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC APRIL 93 WASTE DISPOSAL-LIQUOR STORE 84.99 9208679 `:",J1b MAY 4,1993 10887 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 210.00 10888 C & S PRINTING PRINTING FLYERS/POSTERS-ICE SHOW-COMMUNITY 152. CENTER 10889 CABINETS BY CHOICE WAINSCOT-CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD 222. 10890 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS BELT CLIPS/BATTERY COVERS/ANTENNAS/CABLES/ 1005.48 PEDESTALS/HOLE SAW BLADES/HEAD SET REPAIR- POLICE DEPT 10891 CARD SERVICES CONFERENCE EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT/ 60.00 CITY COUNCIL 10892 CARTRIDGECARE INC PRINTER CARTRIDGES-CITY HALL 83.07 10893 CBA LTD CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING SERVICES-E P CITY 8800.00 CENTER 10894 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC CABLE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT/PRINTER- 611.40 POLICE DEPT/TONER-COMMUNITY CENTER 10895 CENTRAIRE INC THERMOSTAT REPAIR-POLICE BLDG/HOSE TOWER 287.00 HEATER EXCHANGER & FLUE CLEANED-FIRE STATION/RESET FIRE EYE & CLEANED FLAME SAFEGUARD RELAYS-EATON BLDG 10896 CHANHASSEN BOWL & LOUNGE SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/FEES PAID 80.00 10897 CHECKWRITER SYSTEMS CHECK ENDORSER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 434.90 COMMUNITY CENTER 10898 CITY ENGINEERS ASSN OF MN DUES-ENGINEERING DEPT 40.00 10899 CITY SIGNS REFLECTIVE STRIPS-EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER 765.85 DEPT 10900 JAMES G CLARK APRIL 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 200.00 10901 CLASSIC POOLS PLUS INC CHEMICALS-POOL MAINTENANCE 202.35 10902 CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS-COMMUNITY CENTER 113.20 10903 COLE PUBLICATIONS DIRECTORY SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 38 10904 COLORPROOF PRINTING PRINTING-PARK BROCHURES-PARK PLANNING DEPT 9 10905 A COMMERCIAL CLEANING CO CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORES 511. 0 10906 COMPUTERWARE DATA PRODUCTS INC COMPUTER PAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER 70.86 10907 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS LEATHER GLOVES-SAFETY DEPT 53.36 10908 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC SEALCOATING-STREET MAINTENANCE 5325.00 10909 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC LEATHER PALM GLOVES-SAFETY DEPT 31.56 10910 COPIES NOW PRINTING FLYERS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 53.25 10911 COPY EQUIPMENT INC SCALES/PROTRACTOR-PARK MAINTENANCE 29.05 10912 COTTINGTON MARTI INC MARCH 93 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT 2775.00 EXPANSION 10913 CLIFF CRACAUER SCHOOL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 150.75 10914 CROWN MARKING INC NAMEPLATE-CITY HALL/BADGES-LIQUOR STORES 83.71 10915 CRYSTEEL DIST INC LIGHT BAR MOUNTING KITS-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ 1747.45 SPINNER AUGER SANDER-STREET MAINTENANCE 10916 CULLIGAN - METRO SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 33.40 10917 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 223.25 10918 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC DRILL BITS/SCREWS/SILICONE/WASHERS/HAND 556.94 CLEANER/TAPER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 10919 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 5117.18 10920 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 307.47 10921 DECATHLON ATHLETIC CLUB MEETING EXPENSES-I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 928.50 10922 DESKTOP VIDEO WORLD SUBSCRIPTION-POLICE DEPT 15.97 10923 LARRY A DOIG SCHOOL EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 33.28 10924 DYNA SYSTEMS NUTS & BOLTS/WASHERS-WATER DEPT 386.83 10925 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 640 10926 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD SWITCHES/CLIPS/CONTROLS/PLUGS/MOULDING/ 84 VALVE/SHIELDS-EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER DEPT 3309702 e MAY 4.1993 10927 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 2ND QTR 93 FAMILY CENTER PLUS PROGRAM- 2973.98 $2500-COMMUNITY SVCS DEPT/BUS SERVICE- SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAMS 28 CITY OF EDINA MARCH 93 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 240.00 10929 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 250.00 10930 JOHN EDSTRUM FLY FISHING INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR CENTER 50.00 PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 10931 ELIM SHORES BOWLS/SPOONS/NAPINS/CUPS/COFFEE/ICE CREAM- 23.75 SENIOR PROGRAMS 10932 M ELLIOTTS DELI LUNCHEON EXPENSES-SENIOR PROGRAMS 190.10 10933 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC RAIN JACKETS/OVERSHOE BOOTS/HYDROGEN 394.72 SULFIDE SENSOR-UTILITIES DIVISION 10934 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE PUMP TESTING FIRE TRUCKS-FIRE DEPT 339.04 10935 EMMYCO COMPANIES INC INSTALLATION OF FILING EQUIPMENT-BLDG 250.00 INSPECTIONS DEPT 10936 EMPRO CORPORATION TIP & GUARD/NEEDLE/TUBES/SEAT-POLICE BLDG 185.60 10937 CHRIS ENGER APRIL 93 CAR ALLOWANCE/EXPENSES-COMMUNITY 211.50 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 10938 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 67.84 10939 ESI COMMUNICATIONS INC MODEM INSTALLATION/JACK/CABLE-POLICE DEPT 132.29 10940 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 189.00 10941 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-ASSESSING DEPT/ENGINEERING DEPT/ 36.27 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 10942 FINLEY BROS ENTERPRISES HOG RINGS/ALUMINUM TIES-PARK MAINTENANCE 50.00 10943 FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 49.00 10944 FLEET MECHANICAL SERVICES SANDBLAST & REFINISH ROLLER-EQUIPMENT 370.53 MAINTENANCE .45 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT 61.09 46 SUE FORSTER MINUTES-PARK RECREATION & NATURAL 75.00 RESOURCES COMMISSION 10947 JOHN FRANE APRIL 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-FINANCE DEPT 200.00 10948 FREDERICK-SHERRY OFFICE SUPPLY CO CHAIR-LIQUOR STORE 168.27 10949 GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC LIABILITY INSURANCE 117.28 10950 LISA GANNON VIDEO CASSETTE/ASTROTURF MATTING-SPRING 187.40 SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 10951 GENERAL LABEL INC ASSET TAG LABELS-POLICE DEPT 382.73 10952 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY TRAY LINER/BRUSH/MASKING TAPE/PAINT-WATER 53.22 DEPT 10953 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SVC TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1412.80 10954 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC MARCH 93 SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 112.50 10955 GRAFIX SHOPPE SQUAD CAR GRAPHIC DESIGN-POLICE DEPT 150.00 10956 W W GRAINGER INC LUMBERJACK SAFETY VESTS-SAFETY DEPT/KNEE 705.93 PADS-FACILITIES DEPT/SAFETY GLASSES/ HAMMER DRILL-EQUIPMENT MAINT/MOTOR- COMMUNITY CENTER 10957 GTE DIRECTORIES SVC CORP ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 217.00 10958 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 30.00 10959 HARMON CONTRACT DOOR CLOSER-COMMUNITY CENTER 165.00 10960 TIFFANY HAUSER MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORES 13.50 10961 HAZELDEN COUNTER ACT SETS-COUNTER ACT PROGRAM- 927.42 POLICE DEPT 10962 HEAVENLY HAM EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 27.50 10963 PAT HECKER COMPUTER CLASS INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR PROGRAMS/ 78.00 FEES PAID 64 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-RECREATION ADMINSTRATION 100.25 1118851 96 ) MAY 4,1993 10965 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEES-COMMUNITY DEVELPMENT DEPT 717.50 10966 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FEBRUARY 93 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 2297 10967 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 60 10968 HERITAGE PRINT CENTER ENVELOPES-WATER DEPT 131. 10969 STEVEN HIGLEY VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS 549.13 COORDINATOR/FEES PAID 10970 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUPPLY FLOOR FINISH/APPLICATOR REFILL PAD/GRIT 498.69 SCREEN-COMMUNITY CENTER 10971 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT/HOUSING 129.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 10972 HOFFERS INC FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 6615.04 10973 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC CONTACT KIT/DISCONNECT & RECONNECT WIRING 434.89 FOR MOTOR INSTALLATION-COMMUNITY CENTER 10974 TODD HOLZEMER SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER-ADAPTIVE 101.25 RECREATION PROGRAM/FEES PAID 10975 HONEYWELL INC APRIL 93 INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 1200.00 WATER DEPT 10976 ICMA DUES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 388.88 10977 INSTY-PRINTS PRINTING FORMS/BUSINESS CARDS-POLICE DEPT 256.40 10978 ISFSI DUES-FIRE DEPT 60.00 10979 INTERSTATE BEARING SEALS/SILICONE-WATER DEPT 348.10 10980 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC GENERATOR INSPECTION-CIVIL DEFENSE DEPT 208.00 10981 GARY ISAACS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL & OFFICIALS 510.00 COORDINATOR/FEES PAID 10982 J CRAFT INC STABLIZER ARMS FOR DUMP TRUCK BOX-STREET 634.99 DEPT 10983 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 90.19 10984 JAA FABRICATED UREATHENE STRIP-PARK MAINTENANCE 8 0 10985 JASON-NORTHCO L P #1 ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORE 9 10986 E F JOHNSON CO PORTABLE RADIOS/BATTERIES & CHARGERS/BELT 2732.43 LOOPS/CASES/SWIVELS/MOBIL MOUNT CHARGER- FACILITIES DEPT/WATER DEPT 10987 JEFFREY JOHNSON SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEPT 183.80 10988 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY GLOVES-FACILITIES DEPT 36.13 10989 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR DOOR REPAIR-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 59.72 10990 LAKE REGION MUTUAL AID ASSN DUES-FIRE DEPT 10.00 10991 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 2016.32 10992 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC TURBO CHARGER/PULLEY/BRACKET/MANIFOLD 1072.49 BRACKET-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 10993 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD JANUARY 93 LEGAL SERVICE=$11256/MARCH 93 20756.17 PROSECUTION SERVICE-$9499-POLICE DEPT 10994 ROBERT LANZI MILEAGE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM 278.00 10995 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & MARCH 93 LEGAL SERVICE-WETLAND PERMIT 380.00 ISSUES 10996 LAS SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT REAR COMPARTMENT FOR RESCUE TRUCK/CONSOLE 1192.27 CABINET FOR FIRE INSPECTIONS VAN- EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 10997 LMHRC DUES-CITY COUNCIL 167.07 10998 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC MARCH 93 SERVICE-$78-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL 5705.69 MARCH 93 SERVICE-$5627-FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT EXPANSION 10999 BILL LEMPESIS MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE 157.50 11000 ROBERT LAMBERT MARCH & APRIL 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-PARK & 40iiii RECREATION DEPT 11001 DAVID LINDAHL EXPENSES-I-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 8. 0 4510104 L1'( OE MAY 4,1993 11002 LESS GAUSS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT 96.00 * 003 LIQUID CARBONIC LIQUID CARBON DIOXIDE-WATER DEPT 379.75 04 LYMAN LUMBER CO TIMBERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 332.64 005 MALTESE ENTERPRISES INC PUBLICATION-FIRE DEPT 39.95 11006 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS TYPESETTING FLYER-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 343.45 11007 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN/HELIUM-FIRE DEPT 80.29 11008 MENARDS DOWELS/EYE BOLTS/CONDUIT/TARPS/GARBAGE 237.17 BAGS/CEMENT/RUST PROTECTION/TAPE MEASURE/ STUDS/PLYWOOD-ENGINEERING DEPT/STREET MAINT/PARK MAINT/COMMUNITY CENTER 11009 CRAIG MERRIMAN GOLF CLUBS REGRIPPED-SUMMER SKILL 72.00 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 11010 METRO FIRE REFLECTIVE LETTERS/'PRIM-FIRE DEPT 40.42 11011 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO BOX ARMS FOR TUBING/STEEL PLATE-STREET 127.10 DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 11012 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP ASPHALT-STREET MAINTENANCE 71.18 11013 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/SENIOR CENTER/ 834.89 ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 11014 MIDWEST RHINO LININGS BEDLINER FOR 4X4-WATER DEPT 399.00 11015 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO MINIGARDS/CALIBRATION KIT-FIRE DEPT 4632.76 11016 MINILAB SUPPLY STORE ID PICTURE FILM-FIRE DEPT 19.95 11017 MINNCOMM PAGING APRIL 93 PAGER SERVICE-WATER DEPT 15.44 11018 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 712.66 11019 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY AXES/PICKHEADS/AXE HANDLES/BULBS/BACK 1075.87 PACKS/FIRE EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING-FIRE DEPT 11020 MN FESTIVALS & EVENTS ASSN DUES-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION* 25.00 41111021 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC COOLING WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT-WATER DEPT 1230.00 3 22 THE MINNESOTA YELLOW PAGE ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY CENTER 98.00 1023 MODERN OFFICE DESK-COMMUNITY CENTER 479.22 11024 THOMAS H MONTGOMERY CONFERENCE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 748.33 11025 MOORE MEDICAL CORP 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 260.22 11026 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO BRUSHES/BLADES-PARK MAINTENANCE 254.45 11027 MUNITECH INC WATER METERS FLOW TESTED & REPAIRED-WATER 2810.53 DEPT 11028 NATL FIRE SERVICE SUPPORT PUBLICATIONS-FIRE DEPT 168.35 11029 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-COMMUNITY CENTER 65.83 11030 NEMER FIEGER & ASSOC INC ADVERTISING-CITY HALL 671.00 11031 NORTHERN ADVANCED PRODUCTS INC MILFOIL BUOYS/WEIGHTS/CLIPS-PARK MAINT 260.00 11032 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 1ST QUARTER 93 SERVICE 42.68 11033 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY INC SERVICE-TELEVISED PIPELINE-SEWER DEPT 580.00 11034 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC ALUMINUM SADDLE BOX-WATER DEPT 394.05 11035 ORKIN PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL-FIRE STATIONS 95.85 11036 PACE INC INORGANIC ANALYSIS SERVICE-WATER DEPT 138.00 11037 PAPER WAREHOUSE POSTER BOARD/CUT OUTS/SNOWFLAKES/CREPE- 22.31 SOCIAL PROGRAMS 11038 PARAGON CABLE MPLS APRIL 93 SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 3.30 11039 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY CENTER ARM REST-WATER DEPT 100.00 11040 JERRY PARNHAM HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 168.00 11041 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC HYDRAULIC MOTOR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 150.22 11042 J W PEPPER OF MPLS SHEET MUSIC-ART & MUSIC PROGRAM 111.63 11043 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 28.00 11044 DEREK PETERSON SCHOOL EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 175.17 111,45 PETERSON PONTIAC-GMC REPLACED FRONT PROPELLAR SHAFT & FRONT 100.00 BRAKE PADS FOR VAN-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1869066 r- ut, : f MAY 4,1993 11046 PLYMOUTH SUPPLY COMPANY PADLOCKS-PARK MAINTENANCE 295.54 11047 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REPLACED FIXTURE SOCKETS & VENTED FIXTURE- 370.00 FIRE STATION/REPLACED ICE COMPRESSOR WIRING & CONTACTS/REPAIRED RESTROOM1111 DRYERS/REPLACED CIRCUIT BREAKER-COMMUNITY CENTER 11048 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY GRAPPLER LID EXTRACTORS/T-HANDLED PROBE- 315.24 SEWER DEPT 11049 PRAIRIE FEST DONATION-COMM(.U`tITY SERVICES DEPT 2500.00 11050 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN CHAIN SAW RECOIL REPAIRED/OIL-STREET 85.93 MAINT/ALTERNATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ CHAIN SAW CHAIN SHARPENED-FIRE DEPT 11051 PRESERVE REXALL DRUG OUTLET CONNECTORS/MOP/CLEANING SUPPLIES- 17.23 LIQUOR STORE 11052 PRINTERS SERVICE INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 108.00 11053 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC AIR COMPRESSOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINT 193.40 11054 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-WATER DEPT 282.75 11055 RAINBOW FOODS EXPENSES-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 6.14 11056 REACH EQUIPMENT LIFTGATE INSTALLED/FOLD-AWAY BUMPER-PARKS 1772.23 DEPT 11057 JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 940.00 11058 RESCUE MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT 35.85 11059 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC SERVICE-STARING LN & SUNRISE CIRCLE 19265.83 STREET & UTILITY DESIGN/FLYING CLOUD DR SANITARY SEWER & WATER EXTENSION/BRIDGE ABUTMENTS/TRUNK WATERMAIN/WATER TOWN/ TECHNOLOGY DR 11060 RITZ CAMERA FILM/BATTERIES/FILM PROCESSING_POLICE 74.32 DEPT/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 11061 ROAD RESCUE INC 1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT-FIRE DEPT 18 11062 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS COMPANY TERMINALS-SEWER DEPT 348. 4 11063 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC TOYS & GAMES-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 697.48 11064 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/ 674.67 COMMUNITY CENTER 11065 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 107.28 11066 SEELYE PLASTIC INC ACRYLIC SHEETS-WATER DEPT 259.37 11067 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1ST QUARTER 93 SENIOR OUTREACH SERVICES- 1750.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 11068 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY LABELS/SIGNS-WATER DEPT 34.39 11069 ST FRANCIS REGIONAL MEDICAL ( 1'R SERVICE-1ST RESPONDER REFRESHER CLASS- 855.00 FIRE DEPT 11070 SHIELY COMPANY GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE 120.34 11071 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO TIME CARD RECORDER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 618.00 11072 STEVEN R SINELL APRIL 93 CAR ALLOWANCE/EXPENSES-ASSESSING 207.50 DEPT 11073 SKATEVILLE SKATING TRIP-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 130.00 PROGRAM/FEES PAID 11074 THE SKETCH PAD PRINTING FORMS-FINANCE DEPT 39.40 11075 SMITH & WESSON SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 350.00 11076 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC STORAGE BOX-POLICE DEPT 4.25 11077 SNAP ON TOOLS CORPORATION PUNCH/WIRE CRIMP/SOCKET/GREASE GUNS- 158.05 STREET MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER DEPT 11078 SOFTWARE ETC COMPUTER SOFTWARE-COMMUNITY CENTER 53.24 11079 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-CITY STREET STRIPING/ 366 FIRE HYDRANT PAINTING/WATER TREATMENT PLANT MATERIALS 3322013 11080 SOUTHDALE YMCA 1ST QTR 93 SERVICE-YOUTH OUTREACH PROGRAM 2770.00 11081 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-CITY HALL 913.65 11082 SPECIALTY CONTRACTING INC WATERMAIN REPAIR-WATER DEPT 2750.00 1083 SPS COMPANIES BALL VALVES/BUSHINGS/RODS/FITTINGS-WATER 177.62 DEPT 084 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/WATER DEPT 878.92 11085 THE STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO AIR FRESHENER/GRAPHITE/LUBRICANT- 983.32 UTILITIES DIVISION 11086 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ BALLISTIC VESTS/OUTERSHELLS/GUN RACK 5172.44 MOUNTS/CORNER STROBE KITS/BUMPER MOUNTS/ SPEAKER ASSEMBLIES/IGNITION SECURITY SYSTEMS/MAP LIAGHTS/GRILL GUARD/ROCKER SWITCH/FLASHER/GRILLE LIGHT-POLICE DEPT/ EQUIPMENT MAINT/WATER DEPT 11087 NATALIE SWAGGERT APRIL 93 CAR ALLOWANCE-HUMAN RESOURCES 200.00 DEPT 11088 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE 160.00 11089 SYSTEMS CONTROL SERVICES INC CONTROL REPAIR-WATER DEPT 175.70 11090 TANK RE-NU OF MN GAS TANK REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 91.00 11091 TARGET STORES BINOCULARS-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 63.89 11092 THE TAUNTON PRESS SUBSCRIPTION-PARK PLANNING 26.00 11093 TENNANT COMPANY RUBBER SEALS/STARTER/COUPLING/TENNANT 1139.56 MACHINE REPAIR-PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 11094 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC VINLY LETTERING/INSERTS/TAPE/RIBBON- 316.29 POLICE DEPT/PARK PLANNING DEPT 11095 TOTAL REGISTER SYS CASH REGISTER & TAPE-LIQUOR STORE 13203.76 11096 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC CRAFT SUPPLIES-SPRING SKILL DEVELOPMENT 21.33 PROGRAM 11097 TROUT AIR TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS-PROGRAM/ 124.95 FEES PAID 98 VOID CUT CHECK 0.00 099 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN/GOGGLES/ACETYLENE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 99.83 11100 DON URAM SCHOOL-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 1000.00 11101 THE U S CONFERENCE OF MAYORS PUBLICATION-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 15.00 11102 U S MARKETING RESOURCES REVERSE DIRECTORIES-CITY HALL 269.00 11103 VESSCO INC GASKETS/INJECTOR BODY/DIAPHRAGMS/PINS- 476.18 WATER DEPT 11104 VF INDUSTRIAL FINISHING SANDBLASTING TRAILERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 258.13 11105 TRIA D VIKESLAND SCHOOL-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 504.28 11106 VISION ENERGY PROPANE CYLINDERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 403.48 11107 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHT BULBS/SEALED BEAMS-COMMUNITY CENTER 189.48 11108 JIM WAGNER HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 84.00 11109 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO SUBMERSIBLE PUMP REPAIR-WATER DEPT 1089.99 11110 KATIE WALKER SERVICE-1-494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 1266.00 11111 WATER SPECIALTY OF MN INC CHEMICALS-POOL OPERATIONS-COMMUNITY CENTER 210.93 11112 WATERPRO FITTINGS/METERS/GENERATORS/MEASURING 757.59 CHAMBERS-WATER DEPT 11113 WELCH VILLAGE SKI AREA TICKETS-SKI TRIP PROGRAM/FEES PAID 866.00 11114 SANDRA F WERTS EXPENSES-SENIOR PROGRAMS 18.52 11115 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER 1ST QTR 93 SERVICE-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 437.50 11116 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC TIP TAP UNIT-COMMUNITY CENTER 112.29 11117 THE WINE SPECTATOR SUBSCRIPTION-LIQUOR STORE 40.00 11118 WOLFF-FORDING & CO SHIPPING CHARGES-COMMUNITY CENTER 14.75 11119 WP BINDERS MAGAZINE BINDERS-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 23.90 110730528 MAY 4,1993 11120 WRIGHTLINE LABELS/FOLDERS-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT 178.57 11121 YOUNG AUDIENCES OF MINNESOTA ENTERTAINMENT-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM 200. 0 11122 ZACKS INC SWING CHAIN/RAKES-PARK MAINTENANCE 30 11123 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID RESCUE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POOL 42 LESSONS/ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM/ COMMUNITY CENTER/UTILITIES DIVISION 11124 ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC RUST PROOFING-WATER DEPT 133.14 11125 ZIEGLER INC SEALS/RINGS/PLUGS/WASHERS/SEPARATOR 174.28 REPLACED-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 11126 BRAD ZIOLA SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 32.00 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENTS 200660.17 11000 NORWEST BANK MN N A BOND PAYMENTS 788412.50 11000 FIRST TRUST BANK BOND PAYMENTS 72253.38 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 04-02-93 14749.13 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 04-02-93 6226.00 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 04-16-93 14567.01 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 04-16-93 6406.00 44000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE MARCH 93 SALES TAX 30249.84 10313 VOID OUT CHECK 72.38- 10573 VOID OUT CHECK 537.70- 10604 VOID OUT CHECK 30.00- 10609 VOID OUT CHECK 164.50- 10689 vOID OUT CHECK 979.85- 113318409 $1777331.98 1993 MAY COUNCIL PACKETS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE