Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 01/19/1993 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson,Jeandffaxiis, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the Cit vNtanager Craig Dawson, City 'Attorney Roger Paulys, 1Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of °Immunity Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, littemmation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Itor of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENTATION BY AND RECO NITION OF CIRCLE OF F.I.R.E.GROUP((Friends Pg. 64 Igniting Responsible Environments I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS • II. MINUTES • A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 15, 1992 Pg. 66 B. City Council Meeting held Tuesday.January 5. 1993 Pg. 73 III. CONSENT CALENDAR Pg. 77 A. Clerk's License List B. 2nd Reading of Ordi &,nce Amending the City Code Relating Pg. 55 to Delinquent Tax in Connection with Granting Liquor Licenses C. Resolution Assuming «•sponsibility for Terms of Permit Issued Pg. 79 by Hennepin County •gional Railroad Authority for Crossing of Corridor by Cand ood Parkway D. Resolution Authorizi . Disposal of Tax Forfeited Properties Pg. 80 E. CARMODY SUBD ION by Thomas and Grace Carmody. Pg. 86 2nd Reading of an Or«'name requesting Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on .86 acres t Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing Summary of an Ord ce and Ordering Publication of Said Summary. Location: { 8595 Mitchell Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning from Rurato R1-13.5 and Resolution Authorizing Summary and Pubh ion) City Council Agenda Tuesday, January 19, 1993 Page Two F. OAK POINT SCHOOL by Eden Prairie School District. 2nd Pg. 90 Reading of an Ordinance requesting a Zoning District Amendment in the Public Zoning District; Adoption of a Resolution, Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan for Oak Point School. Location: 13400 Staring Lake Parkway. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment; Resolution Authorizing Summary and Publication; Resolution for Site Plan Review.) G. 1501 PARTNERSHIP-BURNET OFFICE BUILDING by 1501 P9. 95 Partnership. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance requesting a Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 1.6 acres; Approval of a Developer's Agreement for 1501 Partnership Office Building; Adoption of a Resolution, Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan for 1501 Partnership Office Building. Location: Highway 5 and Terrey Pine Court. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment; Resolution Authorizing Summary and Publication;Resolution for Site Plan Review.) H. Resolution Proclaiming February 1993 as "Eden Prairie Loves Pg. 102 Its Kids" Month • I. Resolution Refinancing the Richard W. Cohen Industrial Pg• 103 Development Project in the amount of$890,000 J. 1993 Budget for Drug Forfeiture Fund and Cemetery Fund P9 108 K. Approve November 1992 General Fund Budget Status Report Pg. 109 Pg. 121 L. Set Board of Review Meeting for Thursday. April 22. 1993 at 7:30 PM; Tuesday, May 11.1993 7:30 PM to Reconvene Board of Review; and Appoint Members to the Special Board of Review IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS by Hustad Development for Rezoning Pg. 2 514 from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.69 acres and Preliminary Plat of & 123 26.26 acres into 19 lots and 1 outlot. Location: South of Riverview Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from 12/8/92 B. BEARPATH by Sienna Corporation for Rezoning from Rural to Pg•IP R1-13.5 on 38 acres and Preliminary Plat of 420 acres into 77 single family lots and 12 outlots. Location: North of County Road 1 and west of Dell Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda Tuesday, January 19, 1993 Page Three Pg. 146 Ask V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI. ORDINANCES AN RES'` UTIONS A. 1st Reading of Trap ing Ordinance Pg. 147 VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS • COMMUNICATIONS A. Hidden Pond Outi µ ?. & Trails Status Pg. 159 B. Eden Prairie 4,and st Requests Pg. 191 1. Request for (port and Participation 2. Request for ,r:rticipation of Commission Members in Pg. 194 Land and T Board VIII. REPORTS OF 4 )VIS a ' Y BOARD. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointmentsto N. ral Resources Study Committee Pg. 199 X. REPORTS OF OFFF0ERS A. Reports of Cnci l mbers B. Report of Cit*j Man, er 1. Eden Iltrairip ecommendations for South Hennepin 'P9. 201 Regionl Hu n Services Plan C. Report of Direictor i; Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource 1. Riley rake P k Pg. 202 D. Report of Director o Community Development E. Report of Dirctor ot Public Works F. Report of City,AttQ1ey G. Report of Finnce I *ector 111 XI. OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT S AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE HOUSI*TG AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1993 Immediately Following City Council Meeting HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT Chair Douglas Tenpas, Richard AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Anderson, Jean Harris, .H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock I HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT I HRA Executive Director Chris Enger, AUTHORITY STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Finance Director John D. Frane, and City Attorney Roger Pauly I. CALL TO ORDER • II. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1 f 1992 MEETING III. CONSIDERATION OF DOCNTS RELATED TO CLOSING ON PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 8100 MITC ELL ROAD IV. OTHER BUSINESS y V. ADJOURNMENT i S i UNAPPROVED MINUTES HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING • TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1992 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 7600 Executive Drive HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Chair Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF: Executive Director of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority Chris Enger, City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig W. Dawson, Finance Director John D. Frane, and City Attorney Roger Pauly I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Vice Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Tenpas was absent. II. APPROVAL OF HOUSING&REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES FROM MEETIN4 HELD TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 17. 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the minutes of the November 17, 1992, meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. III. HRA RESOLUTION NO.92-07 AMENDING CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR ELIM SHORES The developer of Elim Shores proposed an amendment to the developer's agreement requiring HRA approval prior to Council action on the amendment. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt HRA Resolution No. 92-07, amending the City developer's agreement for Elim Shores. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioners expressed concern that the income levels defined as "low" were actually "high" by some standards. Enger said this was discussed during the original project review, noting that the amendment to the agreement would grant the City greater assurance that thirteen units would be set aside for qualified "low income" residents. Commissioners also expressed concern that there were non-sectarian residency requirements for the facility and directed staff to follow up to determine compliance with this requirement. 411 Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2 December 15, 1992 ill IV. HRA RESOLUTION NO. 92-08 AWARDING SALE OF$9.760.000 LEASE REVENUE BONDS. SERIES 1992B HRA RESOLUTIO111 NO. 92-09 AWARDING SALE OF $2.355.000 TAXABLE LEASE REVENUE BONDS. SERIES 1992C Dave McGillivray, Springsted, Inc., resented the details of the proposed sale of $9,760,000 of tax exempt lease-revenue bonds and for pr.vate placement of$2,355,000 of taxable lease-revenue bonds for the property at 8100 Mitchell Road ar;d recommended award for sale of the bonds. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt HRA Resolution No. 92-08 to award the sale of$9,760,000 Lease-Revenue Bonds, Series 1992B and sale of$2,355,000 for Taxable Lease-Revenue Bonds, Series 1992C. Motion carried unanimously. VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN: Pidcoc1 a moved, seconded by Jessen, to adjourn the meeting. Vice Chairman Anderson adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m. 4111 /� Rob Kesselring //// Chemical Health Coordinator • �� Telephone: 612 937-3656 / / a t j %�� FAX. 612)937-3689 iiiEDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS December 14, 1992 Ms. Joyce Provo City Manager's Office 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Joyce: i At the September Eden Prairie Community bhemical Health Advisory Committee, Mayor Tenpas suggested that it would be appropriate for t Ie City Council to recognize the work done by a group newly formed in the community called Circle of F.4R.E. a Circle of F.I.R.E. (Friends Igniting Responsible Environments)was the result of a proposal by the EPHS student council last spring. A group of 27 student leaders, coaches and advisors was identified. The group networked,created and signed a ch 'mical free pledge and has worked on a variety of school and • community projects to promote a healthy lifestyle. One of the biggest projects is to form and facilitate small groups of student captains and leaders that meet regularly and promoting a change in norms at the high school toward harmony and health in areas such as chemical use-conflict resolution-multiculturalism- gender equality. At the January 19 City Countil meeting a group of students would make a brief presentation on what they have accomplished. After that, it would be Oreat if the City Council could present a Circle of F.I.R.E. sweatshirt to each participant. The sweatshirts were obtained through a state grant to help increase the visibility and pride of the program. Attached is a list of Circle of F.I.R.E. participants. Please call me if you have any additional questions. The 27 participants will be in attendance at the Pity Council meeting; possibly some parents will also attend. Please contact me should you need additional information. Sincerely, 206 ri e �, Rob Kesselring Chemical Health Coordinator Attachment cc Sharon Owens Arne Johnson Judy Schell • Terri Peterson ISD 272.8100 Schjol Road• Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2292 i CIRCLE OF F.I.R.E CORE GROUP MEMBERS First Last Becky Brown Jenny Carlson Aaron Clark Tracey Cronin Calista Feldman Barb Galbert Laura Held Jordon Honeck Suzie (senor Rob Kesselring Jessica Lobben Lisa Ludvig Kim McCollum Steve Olsen Terri Peterson Nancy Pudas Mike Remington Mark Ritter Mary Ann Rolloff Peter Sandness Ben Schnackenberg • Jane Sigford Suzie Sime Gina Snell Mike Tobin Linda Wallenberg Stephanie Wegehaupt 41111 December 14, 1992 UNA1 PROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL IlkiTESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1992 FOL ' WING HRA MEETING 7600xecutive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Directsor of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Publid Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Acting Mayor Anderson called the meeting tol order at 7:45 p.m. Tenpas was absent. RECOGNITION FOR RESIDENTS REGAILDING CHEMICAL SPILL IN PURGATORY CREEK Will Sandstad, Long Duong, and Jim Sanham''I l were recognized for their help in stopping the chemical spill WPurgatory Creek on November 30th. Actin;Mayor Anderson acknowledged their quick action in notifying e City, noting that it was important in keep g the spill from polluting the creek and lakes any further. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to direct Staff to prepare certificates of appreciation for Sandstad, Duong and Sanhamel for their help with the chemical spill in Purgatory Creek. Motion carried unanimously. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTI1 R ITEMS OF BUSINESS Jullie added Items X.B.2.. Lease Agre4ment with HRA for 8100 Mitchell Road; X.B.3.. Accepting Bid for County Road #4 Pedestrin Bridge; X.B.4.. 1st Reading for Liquor Licensing Requirements; X.B.5.. Adopting Re4olution No. 92-262, Designating Bank Depositories; and, X.B.6.. Report on System Committe Meeting of Metropolitan Council Regarding Proposed Expansion of Flying Cloud Airport. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Farris, to approve the agenda as presented and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List 411) B. Resolution No. 92-256. Approving I'inal Plat for Jamestown 2nd Addition (located south of TH 5 and east of Dell Road) HO City Council Minutes 2 December 15, 1992 C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance No, 45-92. Amendine Peddlers Transient_Merchants and Solicitotb Ordinance - Section 5.37 and Resolution No. 92-263. Approving Summary for Publication D. Resolution No. 92-257. Amending City Development Agreement for Elim Shores MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve items A - D of the Consent Calendar. Questions were raised regarding the licensee for Chi Chi's restaurant. Ms. Debra Page, attorney for the applicant, answered the questions regarding the applicant, noting that the licensee represented the corporation purchasing the restaurant but that the manager of the restaurant would be the same person who had managed it from its opening. Motion carried unanimously. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. CARMODY SUBDIVISION by Thomas and Grace Carmody. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on .86 acres and Preliminary Plat of.86 acres into two lots. Location: 8595 Mitchell Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from Tuesday, December 8, 1992 This hearing had been continued from the December 8, 1992 meeting. Mrs. Carmody responded concerns raised by a neighbor, Brad Moe, at the December 8th meeting. She submitted a letter win, her responses, which was placed on file with Mr. Moe's letter from the previous meeting. She noted that there was not a designated wetland on the property, and that changing the location of the driveway would mean removal of six mature trees. She also pointed out that, contrary to Mr. Moe's letter, many of the lots in the area were smaller lots than that proposed by the Carmody's. The Carmody's had spoken to several of the people who had signed the petition and reported some did not know what they had signed, or did not agree with what they had signed after reviewing the Carmody application in greater detail. Some who signed had their homes for sale. Brad Moe, 14372 Westridge Drive, explained his concern that everyone abide by the requirements set forth for development in the City. Moe believed a neighborhood meeting should have been held for this subdivision. Councilmembers discussed Mr. Moe's concerns and reviewed the Carmody proposal, concluding that no preferential treatment was afforded to anyone. Enger said the subdivision met all City requirements. He also noted that a neighborhood meeting is never a requirement but may be suggested for larger or controversial projects; however, it is the developer's choice whether to hold the neighborhood meeting. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to: 1) Close the public hearing; • 2) Approve the 1st reading of the ordinance for rezoning; 1 City Council Minutes 3 December 15, 1992 • ) Adopt Ado t the Resolution No. 92-25811Ito approve the PreliminaryPlat; and PP 4) Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. B. RESOLUTION VACATING PAT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LAKE SHORE DRIVE. VACATION NO. 92-08 The vacation of part of the right-of-Way for Lakeshore Drive was necessary to allow development in conformance with the plat for Victory Lutheran Church. Relocation of a U.S. West Communications line would be necessary prior to the ;filing of the vacation documents. Nancy Nicklay, 16011 Lake Shore Drive, asked about responsibility for maintenance of the road prior to construction. Dietz said the City ',would be responsible. MOTION: Pidcock moved, second by Jessen, to: 1) Close the public hearing; and 4110 2) Adopt the Resolution No. 92-259 to vacate right-of-way for part of Lakeshore Drive. Motion carried unanimously. C. OAK POINT SCHOOL by Eden Prairie School District. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Public Zoning District andSite Plan Review. Location: 13400 Staring Lake Parkway. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment) Steve Thompson, Cunningham Architects,presented plans for a 35,200 square foot addition to the Oak Point Intermediate School. Enger reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the addition at its November 23rd meeting. There were no comments from the audience. Staff reviewed a letter from Rick Gesiwiler regarding the noise from mechanical units on the building. Thompson explained that during summer months there were tests on faulty boiler units, which were eventually replaced. Therefore, he expected the noise would not recur. Councilmembers asked about futureccommodations for parking during school events and a pool for the school. Thompson said that there were 80 spaces over and above those needed for faculty and staff and that overload parking was usually dealt with on the streets for large events. He noted that there was a designated location for the pool near the bus loop at the front corner of the building; however, there were no plans or funds for construction of a pool at this time. 41111 MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to: 1) Close the public hearing; and ��L City Council Minutes 4 December 15, 1992 2) Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment. Motion carried unanimously. D. BURNET OFFICE BUILDING by 1501 Partnership. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 1.6 acres and Site Plan Review on 1.6 acres. Location: Highway 5 and Terrey Pine Court. Bruce Schmidt, representing 1501 Partnership, presented the development proposal. Enger reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this proposal at its November 23rd meeting. Councilmembers asked questions about the traffic study to be done for the intersection of Highway #5 and County Road #4 and how the development of this site would be included in evaluations of traffic. Staff explained that the development would be included in the study and said the Council would be updated on progress of the study. Dick Axel, owner of Axel Dental Clinic on an adjacent lot, discussed concerns regarding speeding in the parking lot, traffic circulation between the buildings, landscaping on the site including the slope to the berm, and the location and accessibility of the fire hydrant. Enger said most of these issues could be worked out with minor adjustment to the site plan and that the hydrant was already relocated. Council directed that these items be worked out prior to second reading and that Dr. Axel be informed of the changes made. 411 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to: 1) Close the public hearing; 2) Approve the 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment; and 3) Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations, and Council concerns about speed and safety; and, 4) The revised site plan be returned to Council for review prior to second reading. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Harris, Jessen, and Pidcock voting "aye." V. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VI. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS • VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES 1 City Council Minutes 5 December 15, 1992 III. APPOINTMENTS IX. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Manager 1. Approval of Enterprise Funds Budets Jullie presented the proposed 1993 Budgets for the Enterprise Funds-Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Liquor. None of the budgets proposed changes in authorized staffing levels. The Water and Sewer Budgets would retain a positive cash position, and no changes in water or sewer rates were proposed. Establishment of a Stormwater Utility was yet to be accomplished by formal Council action, and the rates to support this utility needed to,be finalized. y Councilmembers discussed fees. F4ne explained that it would be difficult to predict the timing of a fee increase until it was known hos much rainfall would occur in the Spring. Dietz explained that a testing fee of$5.21 per customer s+ould be added eventually for testing water for lead and copper required in the future. 9 III MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the Enterprise Fund budgets Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Liquor for 1993. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Lease Agreement with HRA for 800 Mitchell Road MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 92-261, accepting the Lease Agreement with the HRA for 810011itchell Road and authorizing the Mayor and Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Accepting Bid for County Road #1 Pedestrian Bridge Dietz explained the details of plans t replace the existing unsafe bridge at the intersection of County Road #4 and the TC&W Railroad badge. He said construction would be completed partially by the contractor and partially by City Staff,and would likely be done in Spring, 1993. Dietz said that when County Road #4 was reconstructed, the bridge could be relocated elsewhere in the City. a MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded, by Harris, to adopt Resolution No. 92-260, Accepting Bid for CSAH #4 Pedestrian Bridge at TC&W Railroad from Sunram Construction, Inc. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Liquor Ordinance Amendment • Jullie said that the current City Code 'did not allow liquor licenses to be issued for any property which had delinquent property taxes. He reported that the City had been approached by one such property owner requesting a change in thiscot a requirement. Jullie explained the history of this provision of the Code, noting that this was not requirement for any other type of license in the City. He '70 City Council Minutes 6 December 15, 1992 suggested that it may not be appropriate to take away a license when it would help generate revenull to pay delinquent taxes. It was noted that, eventually, the City would receive any delinquent taxes owed because of protection which existed in the State law. Councilmembers expressed concern about the added cost to the City of establishments with liquor licenses, including additional police services. They were also concerned about helping businesses in the City during difficult economic times. After further discussion, Councilmembers determined that there was more information needed about the proposed ordinance change. Staff was directed to research alternative language for the ordinance, how other cities treat such situations, and conflicts, if any, with State laws regarding liquor licensing. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to table 1st reading of an ordinance amendment for liquor licensing pending receipt of additional background information. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Bank Depositories for City Accounts Frane reported that Staff had sent a Request for Proposal to all banks in the City regarding services available for the City's accounts. It was recommended that three banks be used as depositories for the City's accounts. Jessen explained that he was a member of the Board of Directors of the Norwest Bank and would not, therefore, participate in the discussion or vote on this issue to avoid potential conflict of interest. 4110 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 92-262, approving First Bank Eden Prairie of Eden Prairie Minnesota, the First State Bank of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and Norwest Bank of Eden Prairie, Minnesota as the official depositories for the City. Motion carried on a 3-0-1 vote, with Jessen abstaining. 6. Report on System Committee Meeting of Metropolitan Council Regarding Proposed Expansion of Flying Cloud Airport Jullie reported on the meeting at the Metropolitan Council, stating that he believed the City had the Committee's very serious attention regarding the issue. He explained that the item was continued by the Committee until the two issues regarding funding sources and surface/ground water were addressed. Councilmembers discussed the next steps to continue opposition to the expansion. Jullie recommended a three-part plan including continued legal work to be handled by Pauly, continued staff research into obtaining technical assistance from an airport consultant, and hiring of a public relations firm to make the City's position as widely-known and well-expressed as possible. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to authorize City Staff to solicit a public relations firm as recommended by Staff for an amount not to exceed $10,000. Jullie said he would have recommendations to the Council within 60 days regarding a public relatio. firm. Regarding the technical assistance, Staff would report to Council at its second meeting in City Council Minutes 7 December 15, 1992 10 January regarding the scope of work and type of expertise available. Meanwhile, Pauly would continue efforts against the expansion from a legal perspective. Motion carried unanimously. X. OTHER BUSINESS A. Praise for City's Recycling Program Pidcock passed on praises she from a meeting she had attended recently where Hennepin County Commissioner Randy Johnson spoke and said that Eden Prairie had one of the most efficient and cost-effective recycling programs in Hennepin County. XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN was made by Harris, seconded by Pidcock. Anderson adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m. S UNAPPROVED MINUTES S EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 5, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Newly elected Councilmembers Pidcock and Jessen were sworn in by City Attorney, Roger Pauly. Mayor Tenpas called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. All members were present. (Anderson arrived at 7:40 p.m.) III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added Item X.A.1.. New Executive Director for League of Minnesota Cities: and Item X.A.2. Honor Bestowed on Dr. Harris. Tenpas added Item X.A.3.. Response to the Cross Burning Incident. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to approve the agenda as presented and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday, December 8. 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, December 8, 1992, as submitted. Motion carried on a 3-0-1 vote with Harris abstaining. B. Special City Council Meeting held Wednesday. December 9, 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meeting held Wednesday, December 9, 1992, as submitted. Motion carried on a 3-0-1 vote with Harris abstaining. City Council Minutes 2 January 5, 1993 C. City Council Workshop held Thursday. December 10. 1992 S MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the minutes of the City Council Workshop held Thursday, December 10, 1992, as submitted. Motion carried on a 3-0-1 vote with Harris abstaining. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Proclamation for January 11, 1993 as an Eden Prairie Day to Commemorate Martin Luther King. Jr. C. Resolution No. 93-11. Receive Petition for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements along Flying Cloud Drive south of CSAH 1 D. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Purgatory Creek Wetland Restoration, I.C. 52-273 E. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Rowland Road._I.C. 52-067 F. Resolution No. 93-1. Designating the Official City Newspaper G. Resolution No. 93-2. Authorizing City Officials to Transact Banking Business S H. Resolution No. 93-3. Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials I. Resolution No. 93-4. Designating Depositories J. Resolution No. 93-5. Authorizing the Treasurer to Invest City of Eden Prairie Funds K. Resolution No. 93-6. Regulating Fees and Charges for Business License Permits and Municipal Services L. Resolution No 93-7. Authorizing the Treasurer or Deputy Treasurer to Make Electronic Fund Transfers for City of Eden Prairie M. Set Tuesday. February 9. 1992, 6:00 PM. to Interview Candidates for Boards and Conunissions MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve items A - M of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS • MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Harris, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voting "aye." 17 LI City Council Minutes 3 January 5, 1993 (Anderson arrived at 7:40 p.m.) VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance Amending the City Code Relating to Delinquent Taxes in Connection with Granting Liquor Licenses At the last meeting, Councilmembers discussed an amendment to the City Code relating to delinquent taxes in connection with granting liquor licenses. After reviewing the practices of several other cities, it was found that many other cities provide for an alternative schedule of tax payments by liquor licensees. A draft ordinance was presented for Council review. MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the 1st Reading of the Ordinance to amend the City Code relating to delinquent taxes in connection with granting liquor licenses. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES IX. APPOINTMENTS 1111 A. Resolution No. 93-8. Designating the Official Meeting Dates. Time and Place for the City of Eden Prairie Council in 1993 and Appointing an Acting Mayor MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 93-8, designating the official meeting dates, time, and place for City of Eden Prairie Council in 1993 and appointing Richard Anderson as Acting Mayor. Motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 93-9. Designating a Director and Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for 1993 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Harris, to adopt the Resolution No. 93-9, designating Councilmember Anderson as the Director and John D. Frane, Finance Director as Alternate Director for the Suburban Rate Authority for 1993. Motion carried unanimously. C. Southwest Metro Transit Commission Appointment of 1 Councilmember to the Southwest Metro Transit Commission for a three-year term effective January 1993 MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to appoint Patricia Pidcock to the Southwest Metro Transit Commission for a three-year term effective January, 1993. Motion carried unanimously. D. Appointment of Auditors for 1992 Calendar Year • MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to appoint Fox, McCue and Company as the City Auditors for 1992. Motion carried unanimously. • City Council Minutes 4 January 5, 1993 E. Appointment of City Attorney for 1993 • MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to appoint Lang, Pauly, and Gregerson, Ltd., as City Attorney for 1993. Motion carried unanimously. F. Resolution No. 93-10. Appointment of Housing and Redevelopment Authority Members MOTION: Harris moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 93-10, appointing the City Council as the members of the Eden Prairie Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Motion carried unanimously. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councihnembers 1. Executive Director for League of Minnesota Cities Pidcock announced that Jim Miller had accepted the position of Executive Director of the League of Minnesota Cities. Miller would be leaving his post as City Manager of the City of Minnetonka to take the position effective February 8, 1993. 2. Honor for Dr. Jean Harris 1111 Pidcock announced that a Chair had been established at Virginia Commonwealth University to honor Dr. Jean Harris. Scholarships in her name were to be established in the University's School of Medicine. 3. Response to the Cross Burning Incident Tenpas commended Police and Human Resources staff members for quick response to the recent cross burning incident. Councilmembers discussed their disappointment that there were not more young people in attendance at the evening Candle Ceremony. They expressed a desire to work with the school system to make students more aware of such problems so they, too, could become champions of diversity. B. Report of City Manager 1. Set Dates for Upcoming Council Workshops The Council tentatively agreed to schedule 1993 workshop sessions for the second Tuesday of each even-numbered month to discuss such topics as: Community Survey results, City Charter/larger Council, regulatory tools for preservation of natural features, and the 1994 Budget. The location of the workshops would be announced prior to each meeting. XI. OTHER BUSINESS S XII. ADJOURNMENT rJ (0 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST 4111 January 19, 1993 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM. ) GAS FITTER Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. ARI Mechanical Services Associated Mechanical Contractors Alta Limited Dailey Homes, Inc. Associated Mechanical Contractors Dalco Roofing & Sheetmetal , Inc. Bell-Air Heating & Cooling Design 1 of Edina Ltd. Bloomington Heating & Air Conditioning Donlar Construction Co. Boedeker Plumbing & Heating L. A. Donnay Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning GSB Developments Centraire, Inc. Helle Corporation Dependable Indoor Air Quality Knutson Construction E.L.K. Mechanical , Inc. Kohlenberger Const. Egan & Sons Company Magnus , Inc. Flare Heating & Air Conditioning Moen Leuer Const. Elander Plumbing M.A. Mortenson Co. Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Northern States Power Gilbert Mechanical Contractors Petroleum Maintenance Harris Contracting Company Rutledge Const. Larson Plumbing, Inc. SCI Services , Inc. Market Mechanical , Inc. Space Control , Inc. of St. Paul Mid-City Mechanical Coro. Earl Weikle & Son, Inc. Minnegasco, Inc. Minneaota Plumbing & Heating Snell Mechanical , Inc. 4111 PLUMBING Thompson Plumbing Valley Plumbing Company All-American Mechanical , Inc. Ray N. Welter Heating Co. Alta Limited Aqua City Plumbing, Inc. Associated Mechanical Contractors HEATING & VENTILATING B & D Plumbing & Heating Boedeker Plumbing & Heating Alber's Sheet Metal Coppin Plumbing Alta Limited Egan & Sons Company Associated Mechancial Contractors Elander Plumbing B & D Plumbing & Heating Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Bloomington Heating & Air Conditioning Gilbert Mechanical Contractors Boedeker Plumbing & Heating H. I .S. Plumbing Co. Bostrom Sheet Metal Works, Inc. Harris Contracting Company Burnsville Heating & Air Conditioning Mevissen Plumbing Centraire, Inc. Larson Plumbing, Inc. Dependable Indoor Air Quality, Inc. Mid-City Mechanical Corp. E .L.K. Mechanical , Inc. Minnesota Plumbing & Heating Egan & Sons Company Pride Mechanical , Inc. Flare Heating & Air Conditioning Spiess Plumbing Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co. Tomas/Suburban Plb. & Htg. Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, Inca Thompson Plumbing Golden Valley Heating & Air Conditioning Valley Plumbing Co. Larson Plumbing, Inc. Don Weld Plumbing Market Mechanical , Inc. Minnesota Plumbing & Heating 411) SEPTIC SYSTEMS Modern Heating & Air Conditioning Snell Mechanical , Inc. Bohn Well Drilling Co. , Inc. Ray N. Welter Heating Co. CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST page two UTILITY INSTALLER CIGARETTE Thompson Plumbing Superamerica (4269-4159-4441) Tomas/Suburban Plumbing & Heating United Water & Sewer Company THEATRE PUBLIC DANCE Eden Prairie Movies IV Eden Prairie Movies V Cadillac Ranch MECHANICAL GAMES PRIVATE KENNEL Eden Prairie Movies IV Robert O'Connor (7041 Willow Creek Rd. ) Eden Prairie Movies V TYPE A FOOD REFUSE HAULERS Cub Foods Aagard Sanitation Jerry's New Market BFI Dick' s Sanitation Service TYPE B FOOD Quality Waste Control R & W Roff Off Service Blue Bell Ice Cream Randy' s Sanitation Waste Management-Savage1111 TYPE C FOOD Woodlake Sanitary Service Superamerica (4159-4269-4441) FOOD VEHICLE Blue Bell Ice Cream These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for 1.,111 licens d activity. Pat Solie Licensing CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITY FOR TERMS OF PERMIT ISSUED BY HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY FOR CROSSING OF CORRIDOR BY CANDLEWOOD PARKWAY WHEREAS, Centex Real Estate Corporation proposes to construct a street and municipal utility improvements for Candlewood Parkway across right-of-way administered by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the street and utility construction, the City will own and maintain the improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that upon acceptance of the improvements by the City, the terms of Permit Number 92-19 issued by Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority to Centex Real Estate Corporation will be assumed by the City of Eden Prairie. 411 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on January 19, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor A'l l EST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk S • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: Stuart A. Fo tanager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: January 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeited Property Attached is list 788-NC, a list of non conservation land located in Eden Prairie, which has been pronounced tax forfeit to the State of Minnesota for non payment of property taxes. As provided in Minnesota State Statute 282, the County has requested the City to either approve the parcels for public auction, approve sale to adjacent property owners, or request conveyance to the City for public use. The list includes four parcels of property which are currently tax delinquent. The full description for these parcels is as follows: • Parcel PIN Description read.s Specials 1. 06-11-22-24-0004 Wyndham Knoll, Lot 5, Block 1 $15,498.85 2. 10-116-22-21-0008 Auditors Subdivision No. 225, Lot 8 -0- 3. 10-116-22-24-0002 Auditors Subdivision No. 225, Lot 21 $46,593.24 4. 25-116-22-24-0005 Eden Prairie Acres, Lot 4 $62,978.99 RECOMMENDATION: The staff reviewed the four parcels on this list and taken a look at potential usage of any of the parcels for public purposes. The consensus of the staff is that the parcels be disposed of in the following manner: Offered for sale at public auction: Parcel No. 1 is a single family resident lot on a cul-de-sac and is a buildable lot and, therefore, should be released to public auction. Parcels No. 2 and 3 are vacant land that could be subdivided to accommodate several single family lots, since there is a road that dead-ends into the property and sewer and water are available. It should also be noted that these two lots were on a tax forfeit list several years ago, and a buyer did attempt to purchase them; however, that purchase agreement has fallen through • and that is the reason that these properties are back on the tax forfeiture list. • <go Tax Forfeited Land January 13, 1993 • Page 2 Withheld from public auction until October 1993: Parcel No. 4 is located at the corner of Bennett Place and Pioneer Trail. This parcel of land was first looked at by the City as a potential storm water holding area that would be utilized if County Road 1 and Bennett intersections were upgraded with turn lanes. However, it has been determined that that area is not needed for storm water retention and therefore it could be released to public auction. Prairie Lutheran Church has expressed an interest in purchasing the property; however, they are not able to do so by the auction which would be held in June. The staff would suggest that by holding the property off the auction until fall the likelihood exists that the church would be able to generate the funds necessary for the purchase. This would result in the pending specials being paid and this parcel of land being utilized. City staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution authorizing the disposal of these tax forfeited properties as outlined above. SAF:mdd attachments: forfeit/stu • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEITED LAND WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has received from the County of Hennepin Non Conservation List 788-NC, which lists 4 (four) properties in said municipality which have become property of the State of Minnesota for non payment of real estate taxes, (list attached), and WHEREAS, provided in Minnesota statute 282, the City Council is asked to determine the disposal of these parcels of land, and WHEREAS, the City can approve the parcels for public auction, or approve the parcels sale to adjacent owners, or request conveyance to the City for public use without monetary consideration, or request that parcels be withheld from public auction for one year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City of Eden Prairie does request that Board of Hennepin County to approve the disposal of these parcels in the following way: • 1. Parcels offered for sale at public auction: PIN 06-116-22-24-0004 with pending special assessments of$15,498.85 PIN 10-116-22-21-0008 with no pending special assessments PIN 10-116-22-24-0002 with pending special assessments of$46,593.24 2. Parcel to be withheld from Public Auction until 10/1/93: PIN 25-116-22-23-0005 with pending assessments of$62,978.99 ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19th day of January, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: • John D. Frane, Clerk SEAL 1 NON-CONSERVATION CLASSIFICATION LIST• 788-NC ' rt NEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO: PI421101 RUN DATE: 1L03/92 HEN LIST OF FORFEITED PROPERTY • PAGE 28 4) ) SC TMP Rc 99 SFX/ DATE OF • DATE OF BLDG MKT t) PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT BLK PREVIOUS 0P*ER/DESCRIPTION JUDGEMENT FORFEITURE VALUE VALVE Property Type • EDEN PRAIRIE • 06•116-22 24 0004 005 001 NEW CONCEPT HOMES INC 04/17/84 . 09/17/92 35,100 • • 6484 •MATTHEN CIR t•IYNDHAM KNOLL Land 10-116-22 21 0008 • 008 STATE LAND DEPT 04/17/84 10/29/92 31,500 0 13618 ST ANDREW DR AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 225 • Z HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN Land EX ROAD 10-116-22 24 0002 021 • STATE LAND DEPT 04/17/84 10/29/92 40,000 • 3 13618 ST ANDREW DR AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 225 Land • HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINN EX ROAD • TOTAL NUt•1BER OF ACCOUNTS BY MUNIC IJ ; A 4-25-116-22-23-0005 004 State Land Department 04/17/84 . 06/04/87 • 19,900 11083 Pioneer Trail "Eden Prairie Acres" N. Land (9) _ •• • J • • 1 . I/14/91 Heim). Co. L,.IIsT 788-74e- • PL . :,. W R¢' .. Al • /-52 4`-----5 •. ,< . . .I \ i '��"�s=i%Iw�N�H,)h`, *o,.oz (7) 03 0!o—I1(e-27-- Z4-0 04. \- ,'K�c:.::9 ./ 0•,bbfr.• (5) L.AT 5 E X l 1, „ . C¢ ) < WI WYr.)DM.W Kr16L.L� `} 5 li f . J 6 olie .-. le'.\\\ - • e (29) \\�, I S' la J E �i, - 1�'t f �y O', m �i�J` . `�:.,, to ti,. , ( 17) �, .4 fie/.(2 3 _ 1� 4 _ • - (9) IT �' ►►. .5z.' 9 > (93) ( 10) 16 + . 23 •- .55.a' ( 18) o � , 12 ( I S) to •3 7'a 8 J'��' - •.r ' /,�' ( 1 I) h ly / <'6.la (25) 7 !(68) i3+5 - m ISM / 5.•2/ x' o'" i '•4 , 0 67) +• m �` .,q0. �� ,. ( 12) it • `' �4p (24) 13 0, (79) • 5 8 " I. 2' ci 2 - 2 (23)7 �: (80) / 2 (21) °0 Y. i72/.5 176.15 I , 8 23 f fn I. 134.37 . 45, `a .a� • 5 , 11J 4 (7q);," (82)c: •• o . . Wy NnH4N >5o.a los. ,3. .7(6) CMO _L ?hex Q _ 5 , t No2TF} to,a 6' ,(83) .. L .(75) - - --.13..5. , a t 0 • t iiiqh ate4N- Co. 6 \�° F' ,, t 6b) 7 .14s 4- 78e-nle. (6) DOC to (t;4749 (' f 4(rk s �' —--�1 •Ss. _4 (37 - 0 -�- V. Y 19 .)M/ A 0• ,. • N (7) PARCELS Z 3 Doc NO 47:5427. 7' lO--t it. -22-- Z cn 000g e 10- 1I(e- ZZ- r\ .-s � • �4 000Z. _ .,--......... ... .. r' '.;•_)•• .i i..'14 ______1771-'11°:-/7' y,:! � g _ 11 o� u�. " 4 RoBERi's DR. 1�,i�, a�f 4 t 33'� / 12 I w. Ln?7 64.'- •"±_;,,, 1r25E 6 i •: ' .4c..d. A.,,b .k4� ot0 ti'o• 50 t6' \ XJ Y vJ 1, _ 1 A.T I t. ,4r ft..:. 0 I ' ,`1.; c'.\..in- 7.--,) „s:- ,t, $5\0... \,...?;-- y\ 7'r t35 . c37),c 1- ..lw,,t.ys . ,,6 ` (27) s PAILCEL 4. i 2S—ii(,—Z z-23 ' 1 • 6 !6 7 �1�a3 'lir (22) _ (23) I .�(5) 7 III Ca � �1 ( 18�y OUTLOT A 1:' 1 CARMODY SUBDIVISION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in ch District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1,entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the plans dated as of October 22, 1992, entered into between Thomas and Grace Carmody, husband and wife, and the City of Eden Prairie. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 8th day of December, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of January, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on . • �l..D Exhibit A Carmody Subdivision 1111 That part of the SW '/ of the SW 'A of Section 15, T. 116, R. 22 contained within the following described line. Beginning at the SW '/a of the SW '/a of Section 15, T. 116, R. 22, then 0° - 0' north a distance of 170.36 ft; thence easterly 89°, 44', 53"W, a distance of 241.72 ft; thence southerly 133°; 05'S at distance of 170.36 ft. thence westerly 279°, 44' 53"W a distance of 241.72 ft. to the point of the beginning. • 41111 CARMODY SUBDIVISION • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 8th day of December, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. , which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. • C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted _ in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 19, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CARMODY SUBDIVISION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoningof land located at 8595 Mitchell Road from the Rural District to R1-13.5 District, subject to the terms and conditions of plans dated October 22, 1992. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: • /s/ John D. Frane /s/Douglas B. Tenpas City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) • OAK POINT SCHOOL • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITHIN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the zoning of the land be amended within the Public Zoning District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the zoning of the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Public Zoning District, and the legal description of land in such District referred to in City OCode Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and is amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the plans dated December 9, 1992, entered into between Oak Point School, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of December, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of January, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Ten as, Mayor iskPUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the Exhibit A Legal Description: P Outlot B, Research Farm Second Addition • • (3) l OAK POINT SCHOOL 4110 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNFSOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of December, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. , which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than non-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 19, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • • OAK POINT SCHOO 40 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING LAND IN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND INTHE DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFRERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amending of land located at 13400 Staring Lake Parkway within the Public Zoning District, subject to the terms and conditions of the plans dated December 9, 1992. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Douglas B. Tenpas City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) • "t3 Oak Point School CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR OAK POINT SCHOOL FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT • WHEREAS, Eden Prairie School District has applied for Site Plan approval of Oak Point School on 23 acres for construction of a 35,194 sq. ft. building addition on property located at 13400 Staring Lake Parkway, to be amended within the Rural Zoning District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on December 15, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its November 23, 1992, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its December 15, 1992, meeting; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Eden Prairie School District for Oak Point School for construction of a 35,194 sq. ft. building addition, based on plans dated December 9, 1992, between Eden Prairie School District, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated January 19, 1993, for Oak Point School. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 19, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • 1501 PARTNERSHIP OFFICE BUILDING • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITHIN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the zoning of the land be amended within the Office Zoning District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the zoning of the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Office Zoning District, and the legal description of land in such District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and is amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1,entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire _ City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of January 19, 1993, entered into between 1501 Partnership a Corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of December, 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of January, 1993. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor AikPUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the Exhibit A • Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Mitchell Lake Estates 3rd Addition IP • 1501 PARTNERSHIP OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AND ORDERING THE PUBLICATION OF SAID SUMMARY WHEREAS, Ordinance No. was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 15th day of December, 1992; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: A. That the text of the summary of Ordinance No. , which is attached hereto, is approved, and the City Council finds that said text clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of said ordinance. B. That said text shall be published once in the Eden Prairie News in a body type no smaller than Asknon-pareil, or six-point type, as defined in Minnesota Statute, Section 331.07. C. That a printed copy of the Ordinance shall be made available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk and a copy of the entire text of the Ordinance shall be posted in the City Hall. D. That Ordinance No. shall be recorded in the ordinance book, along with proof of publication required by paragraph B herein, within 20 days after publication. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 19, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 1501 PARTNERSHIP OFFICE BUILDIN io CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING LAND IN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT,AND ADOPTING BY RE CE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amending of land located at Highway 5 and Terrey Pine Court within the Office Zoning District, subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST:/s/ John D. Frane /s/Douglas B. Tenpas City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 1501 Partnership Office Building CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, NIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR_BURNET OFFICE BUILDING FOR 1501 PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, 1501 Partnership has applied for Site Plan approval of Burnet Office Building on 1.6 acres for construction of a 13,920 square ft. two-level office building on property located at Highway 5 and Terrey Pine Court, to be amended within the Office Zoning District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on December 15, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its November 23, 1992, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its December 15, 1992, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to 1501 Partnership for 1501 Partnership Office Building for construction of a 13,920 sq. ft. two-level office building, based on plans dated December 4, 1992, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement between 1501 Partnership, a corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie, dated January 19, 1993, for 1501 Partnership. ADOPTED by the City Council on January 19, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk S -7) L DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT • 1501 PARTNERSHIP OFFICE BUILDING THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of January 19, 1993,by 1501 Partnership, a Minnesota Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District 1.6 acres and Site Plan Review on 1.6 acres for construction of a 13,920 square foot office building, all on i.6 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. and Resolution No. , Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 15, 1992, revised and dated December 4, 1992, alp attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET, UTILITY, EROSION CONTROL, PLANS: Prior to release by the City of any building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. The private street shall be designed and signed to reduce speeding problems and limit any grading encroachment onto adjacent properties. Retaining walls may be required. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. 4. EASEMENTS: Developer shall provide the City with written easement documents providing for additional drainage and utility easements over existing sanitary sewer lines within the northeast corner and east line of the property. • 00 5. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property, • Developer agrees to apply to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property. 6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING: Prior to building permit issuance Developer shall submit for review and receive the Community Development Director's approval of an irrigation plan and security equal to 150% of the cost of installation of the landscaping and screening plan. 7. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash shall be stored inside of the building as depicted on Exhibit B. 8. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, developer shall submit for review and receive the Community Development Director's approval of samples and colors of exterior materials. All materials installed shall conform to the approved samples. 9. ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS: Rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened by a parapet wall. If after installation of said rooftop mechanical equipment any portion is visible from adjoining roads and differing land uses, developer agrees to provide additional screening as determined by the Community Development Director. 10. FINAL ORDER NO. 93-01: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for a variance from the City Code in the Office Zoning District for impervious surface to 59.8%. Said approval has been granted through Final Order No. 93-01 attached hereto and made a part thereof. Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order No. 93-01. • 10 I \ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING FEBRUARY 1993 AS "EDEN PRAIRIE LOVES ITS KIDS" MONTH WHEREAS, All the children of Eden Prairie from infants, to toddlers, preschoolers, elementary, intermediate, Junior high, high school, and college students, and out-of-school youth, are deserving of recognition and support; WHEREAS, All Eden Prairie children and their families, as representatives of diverse cultures, religions, ethnicities, socioeconomic status, and abilities, are valued for their uniqueness; WHEREAS, the goal of this community is to accept collective responsibility for our children, to offer support for families, to counsel and encourage those who struggle and to guide and applaud those who achieve, and to provide safe haven for all; WHEREAS, every citizen has a duty to report any suspicions of child abuse, the selling of alcoholic beverages to minors, or the selling of drugs to our kids, by reporting those suspicions to the Eden Prairie Police Department (949-6200 ) ; • WHEREAS, loving actions and words should flow freely to children in order that they might feel confident and competent; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT' RESOLVED by the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota to hereby officially proclaim the month of February 1993 as "Eden Prairie Loves Its' Kids" month or ( "E P Loves Its Kids" month) . AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that every resident, parent, church, school, community club organization, employer, and business establishment in Eden Prairie is encouraged to take an active part in "Eden Prairie Loves Its Kids" month. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 19th day of January, 1993 . Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: 11111 John D. Frane, city clerk SEAL • IO \ RESOLUTION NO. • PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STA'luTtS, SECTIONS 469 .152 TO 469 .1651, TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON BEHALF OF RICHARD W. COHEN • BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City") , as follows: 1. Authority. The City is by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469 .152 to 469 .165, as amended (the "Act") , authorized to issue and sell its revenue bonds and refunding revenue bonds for the purpose of financing and refinancing costs of authorized projects and to enter into contracts necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted by the Act. 2 . Authorization of Project; Documents Presented. Richard W. Cohen (the "Borrower") has proposed to this Council that the City issue and sell its Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (Richard W. Cohen Project) , Series 1993, in • substantially the form set forth in the hereinafter-mentioned Indenture of Trust (the "Bonds") pursuant to the Act, and loan the proceeds thereof to the Borrower, for the purpose of refinancing costs incurred in the acquisition, construction and equipping of a commercial facility located at 9815-55 West 74th Street in the City (the "Project") , for lease by the Borrower to various commercial tenants, including Minnesota Industrial Tool Company, a Minnesota corporation. The Bonds are to be issued for the specific . authorized purpose of causing to be refunded in full the City' s outstanding City of Eden Prairie Industrial Development Revenue Note of 1981 (Richard W. Cohen Project) (the "Refunded Bond") , all as further described in the Loan Agreement and Indenture referred to below. Forms of the following documents relating to the Bonds and the Project have been submitted .to the City and are now on file in the offices of the City Clerk: (a) Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") dated as of January 1, 1993, between the City and the Borrower, whereby the City agrees to make a loan to the Borrower of the gross proceeds of sale of the Bonds and the Borrower agrees to complete the refunding and to pay or cause to be paid amounts in repayment of the loan sufficient to provide for the full and prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; and (b) Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") dated as of 411 January 1, 1993, between the City and American National Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee, pledging revenues, including those to be derived from the Letter of Credit described below 2 r' and from the Loan Agreement, as security for the Bonds, and • setting forth proposed recitals, covenants and agreements relating thereto: and (c) Letter of Credit (the "Letter of Credit") to be issued by Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association (the "Bank") to the Trustee, supporting payment, inter alia, of the principal of and interest on the Bonds (this document not to be executed by the City) ; and (d) Remarketing Agreement (the "Remarketing Agreement") dated as of January 1, 1993, between the Borrower and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Remarketing Agent, providing for the remarketing of the Bonds from time to time, as provided for in the Indenture, and as further provided therein (this document not to be executed by the City) ; and (e) Private Placement Agreement (the "Private Placement Agreement") between the City, the Borrower and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as placement agent (in such capacity, the "Placement Agent") , providing for the private placement of the Bonds by the Placement Agent, as further provided therein. 3 . Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) The Project constitutes a project authorized by and . described in the Act. (b) The Project furthers the purposes set forth in the Act in that the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by the active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental action for the purpose of preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; by increasing employment opportunities in the City; and by the more intensive development of land available in the area to provide a more adequate tax base to finance the costs, of governmental services in the municipality, county and school district where the Project is located. (c) The Project has been approved by the Department of Trade and Economic Development of the State of Minnesota (or its statutory predecessor) as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act. • (d) There is no litigation pending or, to the best of its knowledge, threatened against the City relating to the Project or to the Bonds, the Loan Agreement, the Private Placement Agreement or the Indenture, or questioning the organization, powers or authority of the City to issue the Bonds or execute such agreements. loLl (e) The execution, delivery and performance of the City's obligations under the Bonds, the Indenture and the Loan Agreement do not and will not violate any order of any court or any agency of government of which the City is aware or in any proceeding to which the City is a party, or any indenture, agreement or other instrument to which the City is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound, or be in conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute (with due notice or lapse of time or both) a default under any such indenture, agreement or other instrument. (f) It is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, under the provisions of which,the City' s interests in the Loan Agreement will be pledged to the Trustee as security for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds (except for certain rights to indemnity, repayment of advances and payment of fees and expenses) . (g) The Loan Agreement provides for payments to be made by or on behalf of the Borrower to the Trustee of such amounts as will be sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. The Loan Agreement obligates the Borrower to provide for the payment of operation and maintenance expenses, including adequate insurance, taxes and special assessments. 410 (h) Under the, provisions of the Act, and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than amounts payable pursuant to the Letter of Credit or the Loan Agreement, and moneys in the funds and accounts held by the Trustee under the Indenture which are pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon; no owners of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel the exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay any of the Bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City; and each Bond issued under the Indenture shall recite that such Bond, including interest thereon, shall not constitute or give rise to a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City. 4. Approval and Execution of Documents. The forms of Loan Agreement, Indenture, Letter of Credit, Private Placement Agreement, and Remarketing Agreement, referred to in paragraph 2, are approved. The Loan Agreement, Trust Indenture and Private Placement Agreement shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by one or more officers of the City, in substantially the form on file, but with all such changes therein, not inconsistent with the Act or other law, as may be approved by the officers • executing the same, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof, and then shall be delivered to the Trustee. The forms of Remarketing Agreement and Letter of Credit -3- now on file may be modified after the date hereof as determined to be necessary or desirable by the Bank, the Borrower, the Placement Agent and Bond Counsel. 5 . Approval . Execution and Delivery of Bonds. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue the Bonds, to be dated the date of the initial issuance and delivery thereof, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $890, 000, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, which terms are for this purpose incorporated in this resolution and made a part hereof. The Borids shall mature and bear interest as provided in the Indenture, and the initial rate of interest thereon shall not exceed 6.00°s per annum. Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, has agreed pursuant to the provisions of the Private Placement Agreement to privately place the Bonds at a purchase price equal to par, and said purchase price is hereby found to be favorable and is hereby accepted. Officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this Resolution and the other documents required by the Indenture, for authentication, registration and delivery to the original purchaser or purchasers. As provided in the Indenture, each Bond shall contain a recital that it is issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the validity and regularity of the issuance thereof. 6. Certificates, etc. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to Bond Counsel and the Placement Agent certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts appearing from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 7. Authorization. The officers of the City are authorized and directed to deliver a certified copy of this Bond Resolution to the County Auditor, together with such other information as such County Auditor may require, and obtain the certificate of the County Auditor as to entry of the Bonds on his bond register as required by the Act and Section 475.63, Minnesota Statutes. • -4- I `W STATE OF MINNESOTA ) • SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City") , do hereby certify that attached hereto is a compared, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City, and that the attached extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council held Tuesday, January 19, 1993, is a full, true and correct transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a bond refunding to be undertaken pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469 . 152 to 469 .1651, as amended, on behalf of Richard W. Cohen. • WITNESS My hand and the official seal of the City this day of , 1993 . City Clerk (Seal) MFF04092 .WP5 • 5 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl J. Jullie, City Manager FROM: Craig W. Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager ej Sara Ruth, Senior Accountant DATE: January 15, 1993 SUBJECT: 1993 Drug Forfeiture and Cemetery Fund Budgets Attached are the 1993 proposed budgets for the Drug Forfeiture and Cemetery funds. These budgets are being presented for formal approval by the City Council in accordance with recommendations by the City's auditors. These funds are special purpose ones; available revenues can not be used for other purposes. Fund balances are positive. Council action is essentially a technicality. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council approve the III 1993 budget for the Drug Forfeiture and Cemetery Funds. These budgets will be included with the final overall 1993 budget document which will be distributed in a few weeks. CWD:SR:jdp Attachment • IJ` ' PLEASANT HILL CEMETERY FUND • The Eden Prairie Parks and Recreation Department oversees the care and maintenance of the Pleasant Hill Municipal Cemetery located on Pioneer Trail. The cemetery was deeded to the City in 1988 in accordance with state law by the Pleasant Hill Cemetery Association, along with operating funds of $5,000 and a perpetual care fund of $88, 000. City cemetery operations are accounted for in the following two separate funds: CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND (Fund 19) - This non-expendable trust fund accumulates 20% of all plot sale revenue for the purpose of maintaining the cemetery after it has reached capacity. With a year-end 1991 fund balance of $114,582 this fund also accumulates about $9,000 in interest on investments revenue per year. (Fund balance at year-end 1988 was $87,668. ) CEMETERY OPERATIONS FUND (Fund 20) - This special revenue fund accounts for the current operations of the Pleasant Hills Municipal Cemetery, including burials and lawn care. The fund receives 80% of the revenue from each plot sold plus interment fees. With a year-end 1991 fund balance of $2,981 this fund also receives about $300 in interest on investments revenue per year. (Fund balance at year-end 1988 was $5,777. ) All expenditures are made out of the Cemetery Operations Fund at this time. Cemetery operations are set up to be self-supporting; • the Operations Fund may draw on interest revenue earned in the Perpetual Care Fund if necessary. • • kg , CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ' `. '' AN?!.:;.y:`:.;�� : '•���� �,.. 1993 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BUDGET 4 1993 . 1990 1991 10/31/92 1993 Mgr Actual Actual Actual Proposed Recomm REVENUES 80% of Plot Sales 320 2,120 320 Interment Fees 300 300 250 1,300 1,300 Interest On Investments 380 292 Transfer from Perpetual Care Fund 600 600 Use of Fund Balance 1,429 172 1,566 1,100 1,100 SUB TOTAL $ 2,429 $ 2,884 $ 2,136 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 EXPENDITURES Wages 755 1,344 268 1,200 1,200 Contractual Services Mowing&Burial 1,674 1,540 1,868 1,800 1,800 SSUB TOTAL $ 2,429 $ 2,884 $ 2,136 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 0 Note: Total (unaudited)fund balance for Fund 20 as of 12/31/92 was $1,180. S DRUG FORFEITURE FUND • This fund accounts for all confiscated money and property obtained through drug-related criminal arrests. A percentage of the forfeited funds collected are remitted to law enforcement agencies based on their involvement in each case. The remaining funds are earmarked for expenditure on public safety operations. A Police Forfeiture Committee, consisting of eight representatives from the Eden Prairie Police Department, is responsible for recommending possible uses of available dollars to the Police Chief and City Manager. Suggestions and requests are submitted to the Committee by other members of the Police Department. The Drug Forfeiture Fund consists of the following two separate components, which are combined for reporting and budgeting purposes: Confiscated Funds (Fund 80) - Established in 1989, this fund collects cash confiscated or received when confiscated property is sold at Hennepin County auction. A percentage is passed on to other law enforcement agencies based on their involvement in each case. The remaining funds (almost $17,000 as of December 1991) are available for expenditure on public safety operations. No expenditures other than the required remittances to other law enforcement agencies have been made against this fund. Federal Forfeiture Funds (Fund 21) - In 1988 the City received $259,000 in forfeited funds from the federal government. Expenditure of these federal dollars is limited to law enforcement operations. The Eden Prairie Police Department has spent $223, 000 from this fund on primarily capital equipment items over the past five years. A balance of $35,500 remains as of 10/31/92 . Future Expenditures - Total fund balance projected for year-end 1992 is about $50, 000. Of this amount $40, 000 is planned for a canine field and other needs of the canine unit, and $5,000 is reserved for informant/buy activities. The remaining $5,000 is available for expenditure as recommended by the Committee, possibly to include traffic enforcement equipment, weaponry, and protective devices for the patrol division. New surveillance equipment for the investigations division may also be considered. • • lug s CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE P ,..',,.< .;;.:.# 1. .MI',.MM.,',M.M•:`:•.`:?.:< tc 1993 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS BUDGET «* 'X�.' q " i , r<4..;•';<NN',N: : i. •.,rw 1993 1990 1991 10/31/92 1993 Mgr °REVENUES Actual Actual Actual Proposed Recomm - - - Confiscated funds 8,995 5,249 Use of Fund Balance 70,756 15,546 14,113 50,000 50,000 SUB TOTAL $ 79,751 $ 20,795 $ 14,113 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 EXPENDITURES Wages Supplies 1804 ' 1,168 1,991 Contractual Services Cellular Phone Svc 300 Car Rental 200 1,800 Building Repair 2,484 Capital Outlay 1993 Available for Committee expenditure recommendation 50,000 50,000 1992 Bullet proof vests 391 Kustom Signals Prolaser 4,888 Sirchie Comphotofit 480 Fax machine 3,150 Video equipment 1,968 Video transmitter 1,245 1991 (3)Portable Cellular Phones 1,197 (2)PC Express 286 Computers 2,078 L0aser]etllI Printer 1,658 OkiData Printer 339 Radio Equipment 366 Refrigerator 135 (8)911 Trunking Radios 928 Vericom VC200 Computer 734 Newtek Video Workstation 4,865 JVC Pro-Editing Recorder&Player 8,995 (less EP Crime Prey Fund share of Newtek and JVC Equipment) (6,940) 1990 Vehicle Tracking System 11,995 (2)Heat Alert Units 778 • (5)Shotgun Stocks 356 (4)XT Computers 8,534 (5)NX1000 Printers 980 (5)Tactical Lights 489 Softbody Armor 1,577 Cartop Carrier 100 . Motion Sensor 150 Window Tint Meter 695 Overhead Projector 701 (2)Computers w/40MB Harddrives - 1,988 Computer Upgrades(memory chips, 1,094 (2)Okidata Printers 690 Apogee Firearms Training System 36,500 Shotgun 1,200 Handgun 2,500 Filing Cabinet 325 Night Entry Light 316 Radar Unit 2,205 Remittance to Other Law Enforcement Agencies 2,090 3,172 Ill/ SUB TOTAL $ 79,751 $ 20,795 $ 14,113 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Excess of Revenues over(under) Expenditures $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Note: Total(unaudited) fund balance for Funds 21 and 80 as of 12/31/92 was$50,297. ioff0 S CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT For Year—to—Date Ending November 30, 1992 • • MEMORANDUM • TO: Carl Jullie, City Manager THROUGH: John Frane, Finance Director Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager FROM: Sara Ruth, Accountant DATE: 1/8/93 SUBJECT: November 1992 General Fund Budget Status Report Attached is the General Fund Budget Status report for year-to-date ending November 30, 1992 . According to this report unreserved fund balance projected for year-end 1992 is $2,689, 500. This latest projection of year-end unreserved fund balance is $454,300 higher than projections made at the beginning of the year, and $225, 000 higher than projections cited at mid-year during the 1993 budget process. Estimated General Fund fund balances at 12/31/92: (based on information thru November) Reserved for Encumbrances $ 105,900 • Reserved for Prepaid Expenses 73,700 Reserved for P.W. Storage Facility 325, 000 Reserved for Severance Obligations 243 , 000 Reserved for New City Hall 1,361,800 Reserved for Capital Facilities Prog 400, 000 Unreserved 2, 689,500 Total $ 5, 198,900 Revenues for 1992 are projected to exceed the original revenue budget by $386, 600; this includes all estimate revisions made throughout the year, including the $247, 600 Teman property assessment revenue windfall. Expenditures for 1992 are expected to come in about $112,200 under budget, with another $105,900 unspent as of 12/31/92 approved for encumbrance into 1993. The attached report includes a listing of all department-requested and City Manager-approved budget adjustments; several of these budget adjustments have been added since the last budget status report was distributed to Council. The attached report also includes the following revenue and expenditure estimate revisions, based on actual activity through h November 31, made since the mid-year budget status report: 9 P 110 Building Permit Revenue - is expected to come in at $1, 150, 000 or $150, 000 higher than originally estimated. Street Lighting Revenue - is expected to come in at $55, 000 or $15, 000 higher than originally estimated. Lawful Gambling Revenue - Budgeted in the General Fund at $32,000 for 1992 and 1993, actual revenues are coming in far short of these projections. 1992 revenue will be about $7,300 with $8,400 expected in 1993. This sharp decline from 1991 revenues of $18, 000 is due to two clubs dropping lawful gambling activity. 1991 revenue came from: Optimists, EP Hockey, Mpls Jaycees, and the Legion. The Legion and the Optimists are no longer operating lawful gambling. The Jaycees took over the Legion's bingo operation when the Cadillac Ranch opened in Spring 1992; however, the revenue amounts are down compared to the Legion's gambling levels. It should be noted that the 1993 recommended budget includes a new appropriation of $32, 000 (equal to originally estimated gambling revenue) within the Community Services Division designated for the Human Service Commission projects. Special Assessment Revenue - 1992 assessment revenue is expected to come in about $42, 000 higher than originally estimated due to prepayments collected by the City during 1992 . Liquor Fund Transfer - The transfer to the General Fund from the S Liquor Fund is expected to be about $293 ,600 or $11, 000 greater than originally estimated, according to analysis done during the Enterprise Funds 1993 Budget process. The projected amount available to transfer in 1993 is now $285,800 or $85,800 greater than the amount cited in the 1993 approved General Fund Budget. Insurance Refunds - This revenue item ($100,000) was added to the revenue budget at mid-year. Historically the City has received: $150,734 1990 w/c refund $ 51,766 1990 property/liability refund $ 70, 669 1991 w/c refund $ 92,286 1991 property/liability refund The City has been informed that it will receive a property/liability refund of $76, 000 for 1992, and a workers compensation refund of $100, 000. Total actual insurance refunds will exceed the amount budgeted for 1992 by $76,000. Fire - Calls and training pay is running far below budget due to fewer fire calls. The budget for this account has been reduced by $35, 000. Certificate Expenditures - Certificate expenditures are expected to come in under budget in the following areas: Police - $20, 000, Fire - $10, 000, and Streets - $12, 000. Some smaller projects, such as the furniture/partitions approved for the Fire Department, were • not carried out and other items were completed at a cost lower than originally anticipated. The Streets street-sign database project for $12, 000 was deleted from the Certificate budget as that department decided to do the work in-house. • Most divisions appear to be running within budget, with the exceptions below. It is expected that there will be dollars remaining in Contingency to cover these overruns if they cannot be covered by some other source. Elections - ran $4, 000 over, even with a $13,000 increase at mid- year to help cover the extra park bond and presidential primary elections. Community Center - $23, 000 has been transferred from Rec Admin/Sp Events to cover the reallocation of duties for an existing position. Community Center expenditures are still expected to run perhaps $20,000 overbudget for the year, however, due to several major repairs needed during the year including the ice rink circulation pump and freon supply, the pool boiler, and the main boiler. Adaptive Recreation and Historical Cultural division expenditures are overbudget according November reports (about $8,000 and $2, 000 respectively) , due to temporary wage expenditures. An increase in part-time pay rates set by ADA regulations is responsible for the over-spending within the Adaptive Recreation Division. Data Processing expenditures also appear to be running slightly over budget for the year. • • 11a CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR—TO—DATE ENDING: November 30, 1992 • ' REVENUES • • • 1991 1992 1992 ADOPTED 1991 11/30/91 % ADOPTED REVISED 11/30/92 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL RECEIVED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL RECEIVED GENERAL FUND: GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 10,386,400 10,139,100 5,266,664 51.94% 10,402,400 10,198,600 5,277,041 51.74% INTERGOVERNMENTL REV 208,000 245,200 213,503 87.07% 261,800 289,000 280,059 96.91% LICENSES 131,300 151,400 122,354 80.82% 130,000 130,000 97,114 74.70% BUILDING PERMITS 1,050,000 902,500 845,971 93.74% 1,000,000 1,150,000 1,106,290 96.20% OTHER PERMITS&FEES 608,000 587,000 522,750 89.05% 665,000 590,500 523,039 88.58% RECREATION FEES 786,300 747,900 685,378 91.64% 837,000 818,800 742,812 90.72% COURT FINES 250,000 181,800 166,959 91.84% 175,000 210,000 187,878 89.47% INVESTMENT EARNINGS 110,000 236,000 137,500 58.26% 150,000 200,000 183,333 91.67% TRANSFERS IN 385,000 437,400 352,916 80.68% 596,200 548,500 502,792 91.67% OTHER REVENUE 542,000 600,900 308,223 51.29% 442,000 910,600 283,988 31.19% SUB—TOTAL 14,457,000 14,229,200 8,622,218 60.60% 14,659,400 15,046,000 9,184,346 61.04% FUND BALANCE 675,000 511,700 0.00% 1,137,600 638,800 0.00% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 15,132,000 14,740,900 8,622,218 58.49% 15,797,000 15,684,800 9,184,346 58.56% EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FUND: CERTIFICATE PROCEEDS 357,500 1,900,000 1,900,000 100.00% 593,400 406,000 0.00% OTHER REVENUE 24,500 24,471 99.88% 7,000 9,650 137.86% TRANSFERS IN 12,700 0.00% 4,000 0.00% •ND BALANCE ERR 241,000 0.00% TOTAL EQUIP ACQ FUND 357,500 1,937,200 1,924,471 99.34% 593,400 658,000 9,650 1.47% GRAND TOTAL 15,489,500 16,640,900 10,522,218 67.93% 16,390,400 16,342,800 9,193,996 56.26% Notes: * Property Tax and Intergovernmental revenues are normally collected in July&December. • The bulk of Licensing activity occurs during the 4th quarter, 1991 activity reflects the opening of a new liquor establishment,1992 activity reflects one establishment closing and a partial refund of its 92 license fee. * The 1992 revised budget for Other Revenues includes$247,600 in prepaid assessments on the Teman property. * During 1991 the softball league fee dedicated for softball field improvements was collected in the general fund,then transferred to the park impvt fund at yearend. This fee is being coded directly to the park impvt fund beginning in 1992. • • 1l CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: November 30, 1992 ' ' EXPENDITURES' * • 1991 1992 1992 ADOPTED 1991 11/30/91 % ADOPTEDREVISED 11/30/92 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDEC OPERATING EXPENSES: LEGISLATIVE 84,600 84,600 72,962 8624% 86,600 87,400 83,474 95.51% ELECTIONS 11,500 15,300 7,806 51.02% 80,500 93,300 97,094 104.07% CITY MANAGER 165,200 160,000 146255 91.41% 174,300 205,300 182,117 88.71% ASSESSING DEPT 329,100 309,100 278,332 90.05% 312,200 313,300 269,886 86.14% INSP/SAFETY/FACILITIES BLDG INSPECTION 529,600 504,400 461,947 91.58% 526,900 530,600 477,810 90.05% SAFETY 51,500 51,800 44,206 8534% 58,200 59,500 50,642 85.11% FACILITIES 595,800 553,700 503,077 90.86% 612,800 643,400 542,367 8430% PARKS/RECREATION ADMIN&PARK PLAN 153,900 146,600 134,759 9192% 171,700 166,140 151,423 91.14% PARK MAINTENANCE 751,000 730,500 655,356 89.71% 804,300 815,800 700,675 85.89% REC ADMIN&SP EVENTS 164,400 175,800 161,541 91.89% 203,000 175,700 146,827 83.57% COMMUNITY CENTER 542,000 488,426 90.12% 563,600 593,100 566,481 95.51% BEACH 77,600 67,100 67,155 100.08% 68,500 67,400 60,340 89.53% ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 176,700 173,200 153,254 88.48% 178,700 178,900 153,379 85.73% RECREATION-YOUTH 208,100 195,400 184,211 9427% 215,000 229,700 216,254 94.15% RECREATION-ADULT 77,600 87,000 77,785 89.41% 81200 84,500 78,263 92.62% RECREATION-ADAPTIVE 15,200 24,200 21,716 89.74% 46,000 48,000 51,910 108.15% HIST&CUL ARTS 39,500 54,600 47,609 8720% 45,600 45,600 46,833 102.70% FINANCE 258,600 259,700 238,994 92.03% 275,100 275,100 258,556 93.99% HUMAN RESOURCES 135,200 149,200 122,762 8228% 144,300 147,700 130,957 88.66% COMMUNITY SERVICES 147,500 132,200 110,788 83.80% 149,300 150,300 118,684 78.96% PLANNING DEPT 371,600 357,000 330,555 92.59% 354,600 318,700 283,416 8893% POLICE DEPT POLICE 2,730,500 2,805,700 2,538,782 90.49% 2,887,800 2,917,500 2,572,809 fitCIVIL DEFENSE 12,800 11,900 11,235 94.41% 25,800 12,300 8,084 ANIMAL CONTROL 80,400 62,200 55,702 89.55% 78200 78,200 59,093 75.57% FIRE 446,100 407,900 346,314 84.90% 473,900 404,560 340,922 8427% PUBLIC WORKS DEPT ENGINEERING 583,800 558,200 509,955 9136% 641,400 614,700 548,575 8924% STREETS&DRAINAGE 1,118,600 1,164,700 1,098,359 9430% 1,163,400 1,175,300 1,074260 91.40% EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 584,700 557,300 491,808 8825% 583,800 572,400 481,652 84.15% STREET LIGHTING 398,000 353,700 321,237 90.82% 381,500 381,500 356,470 93.44% SOLID WASTE MANAGEMT 35,000 37,200 21,190 56.96% 31,900 31,900 23966 75.13% SHARED SERVICES GENERAL 433,800 339,600 383,852 113.03% 429,800 408,300 374,141 91.63% DATA PROCESSING 91,000 91,900 85,381 92.91% 98,500 98,500 94,442 95.88% PUBLIC INFORMATION 91,900 95,000 88,337 92.99% 70,700 69,800 57,470 8234% LEGAL COUNSEL 100,000 157,700 104,404 6620% 105,000 135,000 96,499 71.48% EMPLOYEE BENEFITS &TRAINING 1,684,400 1,630,700 1,462,903 89.71% 1,853,500 1,753,500 1,592,432 90.81% RESERVE CONTINGENCY 275,000 155,000 166,132 107.18% 157,000 99,400 68,755 69.17% TOTAL PERSONAL SVCS, COMMODITIES,AND CONTRACTED SVCS 13,010,200 13,202,100 11,995,087 90.86% 14,134,600 13,982,300 12,416,958 88.80% NOTES: Spending level should be approximately 92%at September month-end. III 111/4- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR—TO—DATE ENDING: November 30, 1992 • • • EXPENDITURES• • 1991 1992 1992 ADOPTED 1991 11/30/91 % ADOPTEDREVISED 11/30/92 % BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDEE CAPITAL OUTLAY: LEGISLATIVE 1,900 1,835 96.58% CITY MANAGER 5,700 6,000 6,016 10027% 5,700 5,700 537 9.42% ASSESSING 8,200 4,700 4,252 90.47% 700 700 426 60.86% INSPECTIONS 4,300 800 776 97.00% 3,000 11,800 237 2.01% SAFETY 3,200 1,400 1,400 0.00% FACILITIES 200 190 95.00% 13,000 13,000 1,530 11.77% ADMIN/PARKPLANN 350 0.00% 400 760 843 11092% PARKS MAINTENANCE 2,600 1,900 0.00% 6,500 6,688 102.89% PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY 302,200 292,300 89,192 30.51% 293,100 234,200 39,140 16.71% RECREATION—SP.EVENTS 500 13,900 13,954 10039% 500 500 0.00% COMMUNITY CENTER 12,200 18,500 16,752 90.55% 16,200 70,000 62,838 89.77% BEACH ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 200 250 250 100.00% 200 1,500 1,255 83.67% RECREATION—YOUTH 500 900 875 9722% 500 500 180 36.00% RECREATION—ADULT 1,400 1,600 576 36.00% 900 900 0.00% RECREATION—ADAPTIVE 450 443 98.44% HIST&CULT ARTS 250 250 100.00% 600 600 0.00% FINANCE 6,000 5,300 5,301 100.02% 889 HUMAN RESOURCES 1,800 1,818 101.00% 2,500 2,500 66 2.64% COMMUNITY SERVICES 500 200 171 85.50% PLANNING 3,000 4,000 4,002 100.05% 5,800 ERR POLICE 121,800 166,700 98,404 59.03% 852 ERR CIVIL DEFENSE 25,500 25,500 12,825 5029% 13,500 13,500 100.00% NIMAL CONTROL 19,000 18,800 18,769 99.84% IRE 51,500 38,900 26,228 67.42% 840 810 96.43% ENGINEERING 6,600 3,000 3,002 100.07% 1,400 2,200 1,149 5223% STREETS 49,000 17,900 7,370 41.17% 173,000 190,000 68,146 35.87% EQUIP MAINTENANCE 89,100 53,300 53,068 99.56% 6,000 6,000 5,983 99.72% DATA PROCESSING 4,100 4,166 101.61% 3,000 3,000 0.00% PUBLIC INFORMATION 25,000 4,500 4,500 0.00% EMPL BENEFITS&TRAINING 400 400 100.00% TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 738,000 682,000 369,050 54.11% 532,400 572,500 206,904 36.14% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 13,748,200 13,884,100 12,364,137 89.05% 14,667,000 14,554,800 12,623,862 86.73% RESERVATIONS OF FUND BALANCE: NEW CITY HALL 661,800 661,800 0.00% 700,000 700,000 . 0.00% CAPITAL FACILITIES 400,000 400,000 0.00% PW/PARKS STORAGE FACILE 175,000 175,000 0.00% SEVERANCE OBLIGATIONS 20,000 20,000 0.00% 30,000 30,000 0.00% TOTAL RESERVATIONS 856,800 856,800 0 0.00% 1,130,000 1,130,000 0 0.00% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 14,605,000 14,740,900 12,364,137 83.88% 15,797,000 15,684,800 12,623,862 80.48% 1 1;- - 11111 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: November 30, 1992 • EXPENDITURES" • 1991 1992 1992 ADOPTED 1991 11/30/91 90 ADOPTEDREVISED 11/30/92 BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDEC EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES: ELECTIONS 37,100 37,800 37,771 99.92% PARKS 117,600 121,400 94,995 7825% COMMUNITY CENTER 15,200 15,200 5,874 38.64% POLICE 60,000 8,900 8,894 9993% 133,700 210,100 183,032 87.12% FIRE 252,000 119,300 112,263 94.10% 67,500 54,900 39,895 72.67% ENGINEERING 2,900 2,900 2,238 77.17% STREETS 45,500 45$00 45,278 99.95% 164,400 173,100 174,780 10097% EQUIP MAINT 55,000 42,600 37,530 88.10% UNALLOCATED 20,600 14,250 69.17% ERR EQUIP ACQ FUND TOTAL 357,500 194,100 180,685 93.09% 593,400 658,000 576,115 87.56% GRAND TOTAL 14,962,500 14,935,000 12,544,822 84.00% 16,390,400 16,342,800 13,199,977 80.77% S • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE GENERAL FUND BUDGET STATUS REPORT FOR YEAR-TO-DATE ENDING: November 30, 1992 11110 * * FUND BALANCE * * ACTUAL FUND BALANCE as of November 30, 1992 RESERVATIONS BALANCE ACTUAL ACTUAL OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDITURE! BALANCE 11/30/92 RESERVED for Encumbrances 61,407 (61,407) 0 RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses 73,718 (73,718) 0 RESERVED for P.W.Storage Facility 325,000 325,000 RESERVED for Severance Obligations 213,000 30,000 243,000 RESERVED for New City Hall 661,800 700,000 1,361,800 RESERVED for Capital Facilities 0 400,000 400,000 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 3,372,777 9,184,346 (12,488,737) (1,130,000) (1,061,614 4,707,702 9,184,346 (12,623,862) 0 1,268,186 PROJECTED FOR YEAR-END 1992 per Originally Adopted 1992 Budget RESERVATIONS BALANCE BUDGETED BUDGETED OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDITURE! BALANCE 12/31/92 likERVED for Encumbrances 61,407 61,407 RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses 73,718 73,718 RESERVED for P.W.Storage Facility 325,000 325,000 RESERVED for Severance Obligations 213,000 30,000 243,000 RESERVED for New City Hall 661,800 700,000 1,361,800 RESERVED for Capital Facilities 0 400,000 400,000 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 3,372,777 14,659,400 (14,667,000) (1,130,000) 2,235,177 4,707,702 14,659,400 (14,667,000) 0 4,700,102 PROJECTED FOR YEAR-END 1992 per 1992 Revised Budget RESERVATIONS ******************** BALANCE BUDGETED BUDGETED OF FUND BALANCE 12/31/91 REVENUES EXPENDITURE! BALANCE 12/31/92 RESERVED for Encumbrances 61,407 44,493 105,900 RESERVED for Prepaid Expenses 73,718 73,718 RESERVED for P.W.Storage Facility 325,000 325,000 RESERVED for Severance Obligations 213,000 30,000 243,000 RESERVED for New City Hall 661,800 700,000 1,361,800 RESERVED for Capital Facilities 0 400,000 400,000 UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 3,372,777 15,046,000 (14,599,293) (1,130,000) 2,689,484 ill4,707,702 15,046,000 (14,554,800) 0 5,198,902 1ll 1992 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS ****•******************************************************************************4*******3 This report incorporates the following adjustments which have been requested and approved since adoption of the 1992 Budget in December 1991: 1. Transfer from Employee Benefits to all divisions for wage adjustments effective 1/1/92. (does not include union wage adjustments) 2. 1991 Encumbrances — items approved in the 1991 budget but unspent as of 12/31 and encumbered for expenditure in 1992: $3,500 Inspections computer equipment $18,000 Streets Roberts Drive Trail project $3,000 Equipment Maintenance plasma cutter $12,000 Parks capital outlay softball fencing $17,000 Parks capital outlay staring lake storage building $96,400 Equip Acq Fund police radio tower $2,400 Equip Acqu Fund fire batteries for portables $4,700 Parks Red Rock Lake aeration power installation $800 Engineering capital outlay — chairs $1,950 Engineering pavement/subgrade testing $180 Organized Athletics color paper $170 Youth Recreation color paper 3. Transfer $14,000 from Equip Maint equip certifs to Streets equip certifs — delete budget for 2 small pickups and add 1 4x4 truck, with revenue from the sale of the old vehicle making up the difference ($1,300). 4. Transfer ($2,100) from Contingency to Parks Capital Outlay for purchase of trailer tracks. 5. Add $61,000 to Water System Maintenance budget for purchase of 3 utility vehicles (Enterprise Funds Budget). 6. Transfer $5,000 from Contingency to Legislative for increase SW Transportation Coalition dues. 7. Add $23,000 to Parks Certifs for skid steer loader to be funded via deleted equipment repair budget in the General Fund ($4,000), deleted 4x4 truck ($15,000) and revenue from the sale of the old vehicle ($4,000 trade—in value). 8. Transfer $400 from printing to drop off center svcs within Solid Waste. 9. Add $1,400 for youth open gym program to be funded via $500 in program revenues and $900 transfer from contingency. 10. Transfer $1000 from printing to pt wages within Rec Admin community brochure program. 11. Adjust Streets Certifs budget for purchase of 2 new dump trucks rather than the 1 new purchase and 1 refurbish originally budgeted. Total increase from $90,000 to $108,100 to be financed via a trade—in value($7,000), unspent appropriation for snow plow equipment($5,700), and sale of property/auction revenue($5,400). 12. Transfer $840 from Fire training supplies to Fire capital outlay for • smoke machine budgeted incorrectly as a supply item. 13. Reinstate $500 aquatics capital outlay budget for item inadvertently omitted from the 1992 budget. 14. Transfer $1900 from Legislative recording secretaries to capital outlay for notebook computer purchase. 15. Transfer $10,000 of Streets Roberts Drive trail project carried over from 1991 to Streets CSAH Duck Lake trail project. • 16. Transfer $360 from Park Ranger supplies to capital outlay for bicycle budgeted incorrectly as a supply item. 16. Transfer $8,000 from Contingency to the Heritage Preservation Grant Fund for city match to federal grant. 17. Transfer $5,500 from Contingency to the community survey line item within the Contingency budget. 18. Transfer $49,100 from Contingency to the Community Center division for purchase of an ice resurfacer. 19. Transfer $30,000 of the amount appropriated for new bike trails within the Parks Capital Outlay division to the Staring Lake storage bldg line item within that division. Delete the remaining $30,000 new bike trails budget. 20. Increase the awards/scholarships line item within the Youth Recreation budget by$1500, via a transfer from Contingency if necessary. 21. Transfer $19,000 from the seal coat line item within the Streets division to the asphalt overlay line item within that division. 22. Various adjustments as outlined in the 1992 mid—year budget status report to the City Manager. At mid—year the originally adopted 1992 budget was closely compared to actual 1991 data and activity thru June 1992. These comparisons and any necessary adjustments were made to gain a more accurate projection of year—end General Fund fund balance. • Adjustments made after distribution of 1993 proposed budget on Sept 4, 1992: 23. Add $20,000 to the Streets division for purchase of 4 additional snow wings and increased contract snow plowing, to be financed via cost savings due to a mid—yr retirement and elimination of that vacated position. 24. Delete $5,000 of the amount appropriated for Fire office furniture. The dept has determined it can postpone (to 1994?) the furniture planned for the Chiefs office. 25. Delete $10,000 Franlo improvements budget within the Parks Capital Outlay division. This item can be put off to 1994. 26. Transfer from Employee Benefits division to the Parks, Equipment Maintenance, and Streets divisions to cover union wage settlement retroactive to 1/1/92. 27. Transfer $1,300 from the Streets division to the Facilities division for additional repairs to the Eaton building. 28. Reappropriate $1,000 from contractual service and furniture accounts within the Inspection Division to computer equipment capital outlay account within that division to cover cost overruns on computer purchases. 29. Transfer $6,500 from Park Maintenance tennis court sealcoat budget to Park Maintenance capital outlay account to cover Larkspur and Rustic Hills trails construction expenditures. 30. Transfer $2,200 from Police temporary wages to Community Services temporary wages to cover staff reassignment. \IC\ 31. Transfer $1,300 of those dollars earmarked for volleyball capital improvements in the Park Improvement Fund to a capital outlay account within the Organized Athletics Division of the General Fund to pay for league scheduler software. 32. Transfer $9,900 of those dollars earmarked for a records management study within the City Management Division to the Inspections Division for expenditure on equipment and supplies needed to convert inspections records to a new and more efficient filing system. With a Records Specialist now on staff it was determined an outside records consultant/study will not be necessary. 1992 Encumbrances — items approved in the 1992 budget but unspent as of 12/31/92 and encumbered for expenditure in 1993: 33. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $21,000 remaining in the 1992 Streets trails budget for use in completing the CSAH#4 Duck Lake Trail project. Of the three trail projects approved for 1992, two were completed (CSAH#1 Spoon Ridge & Roberts Drive Trail) and one is still in—progress (CSAH#4 Duck Lake Trail). The Roberts Drive Trail project came in significantly underbudget, while bids received on the CSAH#4 project came in higher than anticipated. 34. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $3,000 remaining in the Equipment Maintenance capital outlay budget for purchase of engine analyzer and shop maintenance system computer upgrades. 35A Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $2,400 remaining in the Planning capital outlay budget for purchase of computer networking equipment and installation services. 35B Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $3,300 remaining in the Planning capital outlay budget for purchase of a personal—computer. • 36. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $19,500 remaining in the Engineering budget for development of a water quality management plan/storm water utility. 37. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $6,700 remaining in the Streets budget for signal light painting. 38. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $10,000 remaining in the Parks capital outlay budget for Round Lake drainage work. 39. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $40,000 remaining in the Parks capital outlay budget for construction of a stage and storage structure at Staring Lake. 40. Reappropriate for expenditure in 1993 $3,200 remaining in the Parks equipment certificate budget for softball field fencing. Installation of the fencing was delayed due to school construction projects. • I %O OP City of Eden Prairie Eden ices prairie Executive Drive• Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677•Telephone (612) 937-2262 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Steve Sinell, Director of Assessing DATE: January 14, 1993 SUBJECT: Board of Review Date and Special Board of Review Appointments. BOARD OF REVIEW DATE By statute, the Board of Review must meet between April 1 and May 31 every year. The Board has 20 calendar days to complete their business. As a practical matter, we also need to be sure a meeting room is available. S The dates we can legally meet and have room availability are Thursday, April 22 at 7:30 PM for the initial meeting date, and Tuesday, May 11 at 7:30 PM for the reconvene meeting. I would like the Mayor and City Council to set these dates and times as the official meeting dates for the 1993 Board of Review. APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL BOARD OF REVIEW In 1992 the Mayor and Council appointed a Special Board of Review. The members were citizen volunteers that were active and knowledgeable in the real estate market. The City paid the members a per diem payment of $50 for each meeting attended. The Board of Review meetings went well in 1992 and the five Board members from 1992 are willing to serve as the Board of Review again this year. I would like the Mayor and City Council to appoint these five people as the Special Board of Review for 1993 : Phil Olson of Burnett Realty. He is involved in the sale of single family properties in the southwest metro area and resides at 18543 Harrogate Drive in Eden Prairie. John Nielsen of Edina Realty. He is involved in the sale of single family properties in the southwest metro area and resides at 9190 Neill Lake Road in Eden Prairie. • Recycled Paper • Board of Review Date and Special Board of Review Appointments. January 14, 1993 Page 2 Gary D. Johnson of Calhoun Commercial. He is involved in investment real estate in the twin cities and resides at 15020 Ironwood Court in Eden Prairie. Dick Sager of REMAX Results. He is involved in the sale of single family properties in the southwest metro area and resides at 6935 Edenvale Boulevard in Eden Prairie. Regan Massee of REMAX Results. He is involved in the sale of single family properties in the southwest metro area and resides at 15571 Michele Lane in Eden Prairie. memo\93bormem • • RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING 1'IiE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS FOR HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Riverview Heights for Hustad Development dated January 15, 1993, consisting of 26.26 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of January, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk S d\ 'I City Council Minutes 3 December 8, 1992 B. RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, by Hustad Development for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.0 acres and Preliminary Plat of 26.26 acres into 19 lots and 1 outlot. Location: South of Riverview Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Beth Simonstead, Hustad Development, explained the revisions to the plan compared to the plan for the same property submitted about a year ago. Enger reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval at its November 9th meeting. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval at its November 16th meeting, noting that the trail options and trail easements should continue to be explored before construction occurs. The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission intended to hold additional meetings regarding the trail. Dietz added a report on drainage issues, recommending particular design features be incorporated into the project, including: the NURP pond be moved to a higher elevation, out of the flood plain with the outfall from the pond piped to the flood plain; the open channel flow be eliminated and the storm water be piped to the pond using a 100-year design criteria; curb and gutter be added along the south side of Riverview Road approximately to the west boundary line of the Schlampp property; catch basins be added at the east end of the new curb and gutter and piping be constructed along the east property line of the development and connected to the ponding basin; the driveway be constructed with curb and gutter or with an inverted crown and catch basins added at its south end. Councilmembers recalled the problems caused by the 1987 Super Storm, which resulted in the ho on an adjacent lot falling down the bluff, the break in the Metropolitan Waste Control Commissii (MWCC) sanitary sewer interceptor, and the exposure of and spill from the Williams Bros. pipeline. Concerns were voiced regarding future breaks in either the interceptor or the pipeline and the responsibility for clean up, as well as what role, if any, the City would have in such an incident. Jullie reported that the MWCC had made an administrative determination that, environmentally, there was no longer a cause for concern about the break in the interceptor pipe. Regarding Williams Bros. Pipeline, it was reported that spot checks had been made for contamination in the area. Bob Brown, owner of the property, said that grass was beginning to grow and trees were sprouting, which were signs of recovery. Clean up necessitated by any future pipeline break would continue to be the responsibility of the Williams Bros. Pipeline company. Councilmembers discussed several concerns regarding the 30 ft.-wide strip of land owned by the City which was located along the east boundary of the property, including: use of the strip for access ( Williams Bros. Pipeline to their pipe, both on a regular and emergency basis; the type of ownershit, the City had over the land; if the land was developed with a driveway to allow for a private access from the easterly-most lot within the plat and used by Williams Bros., whether the Williams Bros. vehicles would destroy the driveway; the need to preserve access to the Minnesota River area for the City; and the potential for a trail within the 30 ft. wide strip. III Councilmembers discussed the need for a different bonding procedure to protect from a catastrophic P problem, noting that because of soil conditions and storm water run-off issues, this property particularly susceptible to such conditions as was shown in 1987. Pauly advised that City Co provisions allowed for bonding for land alteration in a form and amount as would be determined by the Council. A risk analysis, including modeling, was suggested by Council, in order to determine necessary protective measures for this type of parcel. /oR Li City Council Minutes 4 December 8, 1992 Dick Brown, 7685 Heritage Road, Scott Haines, 10449 Huntington Drive, Lauren and Kevin Bluml, • 10549 West Riverview Drive, and Gayle Diehl, 10530 West Riverview Drive, explained their concerns regarding the development proposal, including: clarification of responsibilities in the event individual drainage plans for each lot did not work; safety of the pedestrian trail; a long-term plans for trail access to the Minnesota River; desire for the trail to stay in the location planned; and how to obtain compliance from the MWCC for completion of the landscape plan in the area damaged in 1987. Councilmembers stated that the meetings would be held by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission regarding the trail location, noting that it was the City's intention to acc&=— any other dedicated park land for the sole purpose of turning it over to the U. S. Fish and Wildli Service for park purposes along the Minnesota River. Council directed Staff to follow-up on the completion of the landscape plan agreed to by the MWCC. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to close the public hearing. 'Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the item pending further study regarding the following issues: 1) Greater detail on storm water drainage on the property for the individual lots and for the general area as described by the Director of Public Works, including that all storm sewer be designed for a minimum of a 100-year storm event; . 2) More detailed information on the 30-ft. wide strip of land with respect to the type of City ownership over the strip, alternate access available to the MWCC for access to its pipe as well as how much damage their trucks might cause to the road bed; access needed for the most easterly lot of the proposed subdivision over the strip of land; potential for a trail over the strip of land; and, 3) Recommended methods for bonding of the grading and land alteration for the property due to its soil conditions and environmental sensitivity, with recommendations for design of erosion control procedures to prevent washouts and different grading procedures for the development, including staged construction and other special needs. Councilmembers discussed the motion in detail, acknowledging that they would be setting a-precedent for a standard of treatment for such sensitive parcels in the future. Motion failed on a vote of 2-2-0, with Jessen and Tenpas voting against. Mayor Tenpas declared a recess at 9:45 p.m.; the meeting was reconvened at 10:00 p.m. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to reconsider the motion to close the public hearing on Riverview Heights. Motion carried unanimously. • The Council discussed continuing the public hearing to January, 1993. Simonstead said that the owners and developers would agree to a postponement at this time pending resolution of the three items discussed. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the public hearing for Riverview Heights to January 19, 1993, pending resolution of the issues raised at this meeting. Motion carried unanimously. I .' STAFF REPORT • TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Director of Planning FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: November 6, 1992 SUBJECT: Riverview Heights II APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Bob Brown, Jim Brown, and Wallace Hustad LOCATION: South of Riverview Road REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.69 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 26.26 acres into 19 lots and 2 outlots. 11111 1"-- --- `11 -.0-g• :...- 7.. .i.4:.• TcAtit I 1111. Val MR. °. T . . , . . 111.At'" IP '', lianas illik......46• 4104,614., . IR txw000 0•01.-- ro-- A- 4 - . log cc •;-.)4. , lb - ea • All41.1 ' •,t-.114$101111 E. • es .1 g ... ,.... ..... 01111111111111 a646 . coo, 2 ,„.. .0 4._ 4,tiii -1,4. .. ...,es..%%.. . ,,,ii... 44oLere4 'ait&ST;; ...' 4" 7 . • . I 111 I ll • • ' . Illt Ilitittax R tt*w • NI .° N.- • •- IIIIIMINIr 004* 0.'. 4-?Vili 'i:a74". ./ OAK • ' • . 7: lir RINE..zwee • iirit. ..... .., vw.41 . 0 7t ---‹ A I "1111 -r" "414 trii 4t's'S'.:"..$1,00ir.'- itit l'9/' SM. MY, 0- • . /al gilt4X.44C./.. :4• 111 I 4 . • • C - 11--- ; • '-'I% ' I kt•14 4,$:74104‘ INE gra -H . '..- . i • 14:141)-' ‘111 12;142;fe;:k.,\V•:•0 -ie : . ‘ . 1 PUP° ' .,..te," o• •-•" - ' - - • • ' II R L.. s. • aier I ,.:1 . . . -- ; . _ RD. _ - N.C.'. . Roo i....1 ?'ril-';;•"' .--.-. - •. • I . • . VALLk. . • flq• 1 0 0 I Prbe00,ect . : i . 1•Of *.... . • • ..•....•.•.•....•.•.• . --,-•:EiEj;; ;! ii:i:,.. rtifineviaKiver •"--:•-: :: ;i,,::-.... • • *:::: **IE:,.,-: . ,, ... ..,,:iiiiiii...;.:,s.::::::•:,::::::::•::R:i:F::::: • IL9 • • Staff Report Riverview Heights II November 6, 1992 BACKGROUND Approximately one year ago, the proponents requested a subdivision of 65 acres into 33 lots. The proposal was approved by the Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission. When the project was reviewed by the City Council, the surrounding neighbors submitted a petition for an EAW. The project did not meet the mandatory category of 250 units or the discretionary category of 40 units. However, the project did involve shoreland area therefore an EAW could be petitioned. The City requested that proponents prepare an EAW. City Staff, the proponents and other agencies including DNR, Army Corp, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, PCA, MWCC, and the Metropolitan Council met on two separate occasions to discuss the EAW, their comments, and ways the City and developer could address their concerns. The proponent agreed to reduce grading, provide a construction pond during initial construction, NURP ponding, and extra erosion control. The City felt that this met the concerns of the other agencies, however the Metropolitan Council did not agree and indicated that if the City did not find a significant environmental impact, that the Metropolitan Council would either take the City to court or order a Metropolitan Significance Review of this project. • The City staff, the proponent and the Mayor appeared before the Metropolitan Council Physical Development Committee to discuss the results of the EAW. After a 4 hour meeting, the Metropolitan Council did not pass favorably on the EAW. Based on this, the proponent withdrew the request. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The proponent is submitting a revised development plan for 19 lots on the top of the slope. Although the proposal ends in a cul-de-sac, there is an outlot that could be a potential location for future road access to the lower portion of the property. The development proposal on the top of the slope is similar to the original proposal. This proposal does not trigger any EAW categories. PRELIMINARY PLAT • The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 26 acres into 19 lots and two outlots at a net density of 1.73 per acre. A portion of the property is already zoned R1-22 and the lots that are less than this lot size are proposed for rezoning to R1-13.5. The density of 1.73 units per acre is a reasonably density considering the topography and the trees on the property. • 2 Staff Report411 Riverview Heights II November 6, 1992 BLUFF PROTECTION The City has the responsibility to review development in an area as significant of the Minnesota River Bluffs in a way that protects it as a natural resource, while allowing private development. The development proposal concentrates development with small lots adjacent to Riverview Road and transitions to larger lots on the middle portion on the Bluff. Grading on the Bluff will be minimized since the initial grading would be limited to the construction of the road and utility improvements. The grading limits established with the first phase indicate a minimal amount of grading and tree removal necessary for these improvements. However, with the development of a subdivision, quite often the most impact on the site is realized when the homes are built. With this project, lots are sized according to match the expectum home size. The grading plan depicts hypothetical house pads of 80 x 55 feet. Because these lots are walk-outs, the impact on the tree cover can be minimized. For each lot to be constructed within this subdivision, an individual grading permit would be required. This would allow City participation in the individual design of houses on the site. The developer would be required to place and maintain erosion control around all initial construction and be responsible for placement and maintenance of erosion control on each of the lots as needed. • TREE LOSS The first proposal showed 15,180 inches of significant trees on this site. With the installation of utilities in the roadway, a total of 516 inches would be lost, or 3.75%. In the worse case scenario based upon the building pads as proposed, a total of 1,114 inches of trees would be removed or approximately 25%. If the balance of the property develops in the future consistent with the original development plan, the amount of tree loss on the total site would be 15%. This compares quite favorably with the average tree loss of 30% for other residential subdivisions in the City. The lower percentage tree loss in this case is consistent with the sensitivity of this area. Although tree replacement would be calculated based on the worse case grading plan, the developer could be credited back as individual homes are constructed if additional trees are saved. Tree loss can be a measure of impact on the Bluff character. Net tree loss is calculated at 25%. This compares with a net tree loss on the Timber Bluffs project of 75%. • 3 Staff Report Riverview Heights II November 6, 1992 A tree replacement plan is required for a total of 370 caliper inches. The majority of trees to be replaced should be Oak. SITE GRADING Slope stabilization is extremely important on the Minnesota River Bluff. Individual grading permits will be required for each lot to assure that the minimal amount of site is being disturbed at any one time. This also helps protect erosion of the Bluff and minimize pollution of the Minnesota River. Development on these slopes will require especially engineered design footings in retaining walls because of the type of soil which is sand and also due to the steepness of the slope. It will be required that an engineer certify the structural capability of these retaining walls and footings prior to the issuance of the building permit. Many of the homes that are constructed on steep slopes have large roof areas. Rather than having the water sheet drain off of the back of the roofs down the slopes which is an erosion problem, these homes should be designed with a gutter system. This would channel the storm water runoff into a storm sewer pipe to be constructed along the back sides of the homes on the . top of the slope. This is similar to the requirement in the Bluffs West 9th Addition. SHORELAND ORDINANCE The Shoreland area is 300 feet from the Minnesota River. This site is over 500 feet from the River and therefore provisions of the Shoreland Ordinance do not apply. UTILITIES Sewer and water is available to this site. Due to the steepness of the slope and the homes located down the slope, a lift station will be required. This lift station must be sized large enough to accommodate sewerable area. Since development of the lower portion of the Bluffs is a possibility in the future, the utilities will have to take this into consideration when they are designed and built. There is no guarantee that the land lower on the slope will be developed. STORM WATER QUALITY The City of Eden Prairie is currently applying new regulations regarding storm water runoff and water quality. As part of this project, it will be required that a NURP pond be installed on the property. The practice of using a NURP pond will minimize the amount of phosphorus that could be discharged into the wetland area, flood plain, and river channel of the Minnesota River. 11111 1 i Staff Report Riverview Heights II 411 November 6, 1992 The pond is proposed in the river flood plain. This location must be confirmed to be outside the river floodway. The pond dike design must consider protection from erosion during river flood events. Storm drainage from the street drains by storm sewer pipe into a ravine. This will erode the ravine and send soil/sediment into the Minnesota River. The storm sewer pipe shall be extended to the pond. The storm sewer system and pond must be designed for 100 year storm events because of the steepness of the bluff and high potential for erosion. This is consistent with City requirements for other steep slope areas. Roof drainage can erode the slope. A roof drain and gutter system should be tied in the storm sewer system on lots with steep slopes. The existing driveway which is to provide access to lot 8, is in an eroding area. Hard surfacing this driveway will compound the problem by increasing runoff. No storm sewer is proposed in this area. A drainage solution is required or another access to this lot should be considered. ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY1111 With the preparation of an EAW an archeological survey was completed (see attached). The survey indicates the possibility of archaeologically sensitive area in sites 39 - 52 in the lower portion of the site. This portion of the site would not have been disturbed under the original proposal nor is this area to be disturbed as part of this proposal. VACATION OF ROAD RIGHT OF WAY If Red Oak Drive is vacated, lot 8 will not have access since the right of way reverts back to the adjoining owners. Either a private easement will be necessary or the road should not be vacated. Then the City must give permission to construct a driveway in City right of way. CONCLUSION This property has been subdivided and zoned R1-22 for approximately 30 years. This property can develop with septic tanks without any City further review other than building permit. The property could also develop with a private road. A public road can also be constructed within the City right-of-way to access the existing lots. Developing the property in such a manner 5 S • Staff Report Riverview Heights II November 6, 1992 would disturb more of the existing topography and trees than the current preliminary plat. The City recognizes the Minnesota River Bluff as a unique and valuable resource. Eden Prairie has always been concerned about the impact of development on natural environment and has encouraged the careful and knowledgeable development along the Bluff. The City in the approval of the Timber Bluff Subdivision approximately two years ago to the east of this site considered low density residential as an appropriate use of the Bluff because of the size of the houses and low density would allow more natural features to remain. The City also learned ways in which impacts on the Bluff can be minimized by going through the environmental review process with other agencies such as the Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, the Pollution Control Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. Their recommendations and suggestions have been incorporated to the greatest extent possible within this proposal. The request for subdivision and rezoning which allows a gradual increase in lot sizes from the top of the Bluff to the midpoint on the Bluff is consistent with City policy and the Comprehensive Plan on this site. Although the potential exists for future development of the lower portion of the Bluff, there is no guarantee that the City or other agencies would be amenable to this. Essential to the protection of the Bluff is minimizing the disruption of the tree cover which provides natural slope stabilization. It is critical during the development and construction process that careful monitoring of each individual site with the detailed grading permit and special erosion control will be required. For the steep slopes that are not proposed to be disturbed by grading, a scenic easement should be provided which will protect the natural vegetation. This is consistent with the Timber Bluffs projects and other projects along creek areas. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of the request for rezoning from R1-22 to R1- 13.5 and preliminary plat of 26.26 acres into 19 lots and 2 outlots based on plans dated November 6, 1992, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report and subject to the following conditions: 6 i Staff Report Riverview Heights II 1111 November 6, 1992 1. Prior to council review, the proponent shall: A. Modify the preliminary plat to depict conservancy easements along the steep slopes. B. Modify the utility plan to provide for a storm sewer pipe along the back of the homes adjacent to the Bluff. Extend the storm sewer pipe to the pond. Design the storm sewer system for 100 year storm. Find a drainage solution for access to lot 8. 2. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, proponent shall: following Submit plans with the f o g information: 1. A site plan with house located within the proposed pad area. 2. A grading plan based on field verified topography. 3. No additional retaining walls beyond the approved grading plan. 4. No steepening of the natural slopes. 5. Walk-out levels must meet natural grade. 6. No more than 20 foot wide construction area on the down-slope of the house. 7. Restoration and erosion control plans. 8. No construction of grading and backyard conservation easement on the steep slopes. 7 • • 1j Staff Report Riverview Heights II November 6, 1992 9. Soil test. 10. Engineer's design for footing, foundation and retaining walls. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, pay the appropriate cash park fee. 5. Prior to the City considering acceptance of land as a gift to the City for open space purposes, proponent shall provide a Level I environmental audit to determine the extent of potential pollution on-site. 6. Prior to grading on the property, proponent shall be required to stake the construction limits with snow fencing. The proponent shall notify the City and Watershed District a minimum of 48 hours in advance of grading. • • 8 '2., r • Lower Minnesota River Watershed Distric • ` ~Z- •r 151 WEST 128TH STREE BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 5532 January 14, 1993 Cyril B. BBB President Jim A. Kephart Via President Merrill M. Madsen rira.a.ry Edward A. Schiempp Asst. TwAsurer William J.Jaeger,Jr. Sae:mts y Lawrence B. Samatad Rneineer Bruoe D. Melkerson AIMrncy Mr. Gene Dietz , City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Riverview Heights, Grading and Erosion Control Plan, Riverview Road, Eden Prairie. On Wednesday, January 6, you called my office and asked that as Engineer for the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District I attend a meeting to discuss preliminary plans for the above project for the purpose of Watershed District review and comment. On Tuesday January 12, at 10: 30 AM, I met with, you, Mr. Alan Gray, Mr. • Randall IHedlund, Engineer for the Developer, the Developer and Consultants, to discuss a new plan for this project. I was given sheets 3 and 6 of the project plans. The discussion took place without any prior review of the plans on my part. Last night at the regular meeting of the Managers of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District, the Managers requested that I forward to you my preliminary comments on the preliminary project plans. The comments below are a combination of the summary of Managers discussion the M s of the �7an t i meetingand mycomments to . 12 t g at their meeting last night. I was told that the storm sewer was to be designed for a 100 year storm event. Time of duration was not specified and must be considered in the design. I pointed out that recent data from the Minnesota State Climatologist indicates that the 100 year storm has been exceeded around GO times in the past 20 years. Mr. Gray also pointed out that the 100 year event may provide for some "factor of safety" if the pipes carrying the flow are surcharged and the quantity of flow is therefore increased from the un-surcharged design. A point here is that the flows determined by the use of computer studies usually includes some reduction of runoff flow due to infiltration into the area soils. These computer models do not consider the fact that in most soils, any rainfall over 1 inch in quantity in one hour causes the soils to become saturated and the • 1 of 3 • I � Mr. Gene Deitz, City of Eden Prairie - 2 of 3 - Jan. 14, 1993 0 Re: Riverview Heights balance of the design rainfall does not infiltrate and rune off completely. Similarly, when the ground is frozen or there is an ice layer in the snow or at the ground surface, the runoff is total. These facts should be a part of the storm water design and I would like to review the criteria for the designs. A storm sewer of unknown size and slopes was to be installed on the east side of the property from Riverview Road south to a manhole shown on the plans. Also other changes in manholes and grades of the storm sewer system were to be made. no profiles were given to me for review. My final review of the plans will await the inclusion of these details. It was stated that grading that would deliver storm water to the storm sewer system would be done in two weeks. It was not clear how long the clearing, grubbing, storm sewer installation and other work would take before this final grading would be commenced. Clearing and grading these steep slopes will open them to possible erosion and deposition of sediments in the flood plain and wetlands below the project. Final plans should include a workable erosion control plan that will not be torn out at each stage of construction. Staging of the erosion control methods and grading should be a part of the plan. • The pond was, according to Mr. Hedlund, the Engineer, designed according to NURP Standards. I recommended that the pond be considered to handle ALL runoff from the development and any area thought to be developed and drained to the pond in the foreseeable future. A discussion was had with regard to the Pond and the Flood Plain and the Wetlands of the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District. I indicated that possibly a better and more efficient use of the pond height and locale might be considered by the District. I would be happy to work with you on relocation of such a pond if you desire. The present problems of Riverview Road drainage and flows down the slopes to the south of Riverview Road due to insufficient capacity of storm sewers on the north side were discussed. The consideration was to put off the decisions on these matters until some time in the future and that the storm sewer on the east side would "probably" take care of the flow which now cause erosion problems on the south side of Riverview Road at the development location and also to the east of the development. I think these decisions should be made a part of this project since this project may add runoff to this already overtaxed system. I understand from the plan that to accommodate the development much of the slopes of the area will be denuded of trees and other vegetation. Also, some slopes will have to be increased and become steeper. Both of these items are very important to the project as Mr. Gene Peitz, City of Edon Prairie - 3 of 3 - Jan. 14, 1993 • Re: Riverview Heights a whole, and impress on one the need to fully consider carefully the details of the project. I have made no final judgments as to the details of this development. The materials I have been given are preliminary and incomplete. I suggest that sufficient time be given if tho City of Eden Prairie or the Developer wishes the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District to review and comment on Riverview Heights. I have scheduled a vacation from January 19 to February 3 . Should you wish, I would be glad to meet with you and the Developer on my return and lend any assistance you require at that time. Since the next meeting of the Managers is on February 10, if the plans for Riverview Heights are completed and available on February 4 , I would be able to complete a review before the next meeting of the Managers. Yours truly, • Lawrence E. Sametad, 4)Lawrence . Engineer cc: Mayor and City Council, City of Eden Prairie Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie City Manager Managers Bruce Malkerson, Staff Attorney • BEARPATH CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BEARPATH FOR SIENNA CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Bearpath for Sienna Corporation dated January 8, 1993, consisting of 420 acres into 77 lots and 12 outlots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of January, 1993. • Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • S m J ( C STAFF REPORT S CTO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Chris Enger, Community Development Director FROM: Michael D. Franzen, Senior Planner DATE: December 11, 1992 SUBJECT: Bearpath - Phase I APPLICANT/ Sienna Corporation FEE OWNER: LOCATION: North of County Road 1, East of Riley Lake and West of Dell Road REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 38 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 420 acres into 77 single family lots and 12 outlots. • ( 3. Review of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Li dWIN0.SSEN -Ic'-' •. r-• . ly ' 1 '; �1���'' l M1iMtLL 7 4.'� SI � 1 (rQ7' t �•1, Ov u.• ', llsrr wa II 1 �� _ . r ' I:. W. 91.0 Ill CINCe.7.1....V. as - - �: a' f.• � ►1 .•:• a" "ii VIA • t 10[•?1„ . ri . .- Z.. . i .7.------ . • .p©D avwotrs IAta,40i Na � — __ f aanotart Pt • 1Ufa _ - OP IP --1_ _. -:. r - ,___. ,.,____ .gyg,, 0 �yl Ma Caw,tamer 1 r rK..i..t.O.a =Y L\• ra uitnrlW 7 Ih.O•cllut twgf • m r\.oto it • i E"-T_i:-a-�r- `�. Irc..,.. . dn. • • •• lMn ," w ..... ,01: C C 411k Staff Report Bearpath - Phase I December 11, 1992 BACKGROUND When the Planning Commission reviewed the request for PUD Concept and Comprehensive Guide Plan change, the "General Feasibility" of whether or not a private golf course and controlled access residential community could be an appropriate use of this property was discussed. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and the Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission used the Planned Unit Development process to identify general issues and the approach for dealing with them. The Planning Commission identified the following issues to be addressed with subsequent rezoning and platting phases of the property: 1. Size and number of NURP ponds for water quality analysis. 2. Phosphorus loading analysis. 3. Minimizing erosion impacts through grading the property in phases, using MPCA best management practices and seeding the property immediately after grading. 4. Reducing tree loss from 38% to 30%. 5. Sewer and water extension. 6. Minimizing wetland impacts. 7. Public road to be built to City standards. 8. Meeting the Shoreland Ordinance. 9. Meeting the Flood Plain Ordinance. 10. Sidewalks and Trails. REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - PHASE I Phase I of this project depicts 77 single family lots. The entire 420 acres is being platted into outlots based on the PUD development plan. Each of these outlots return to the Planning Commission later this year for rezoning and preliminary plat approval the number of lots in Phase I (77 lots) is consistent with the PUD. The road follows the exact alignment as depicted in the PUD. The lot sizes are similar. As part of Phase One, feasibility studies for utilities and • 2 Staff Report • Bearpath - Phase I December 11, 1992 easements will be started. The Commission will have an opportunity to review these items as subsequent phases are submitted. Tree loss, storm sewer, water quality and wetland impacts will also be reviewed as each phase is submitted. STORM WATER OUALITY ANALYSIS As part of the Storm Water Quality plan, all storm drainage generated from Dell Road and the subdivision shall be routed and treated through NURP ponds. These NURP ponds have been designed based upon the amount of water draining into them from the surrounding watershed. The computations for the size of the NURP ponds are indicated as part of the storm water quality analysis contained in the environmental assessment worksheet (EAW). The actual construction details must be submitted for review by the City Staff prior to final plat. NURP ponds and storm sewer pipes shall be installed concurrent with grading of the golf course and subdivision. A phosphorus loading analysis has been completed and is included in the EAW. The City will rely upon the Pollution Control Agency, Watershed District, Army Corp of Engineers and DNR to evaluate the effectiveness of this analysis. EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING IMPACTS C • Minimal site grading will be necessary with this phase as only the road will be graded and each lot will be developed on a custom grading basis. This means that each individual lot will require a detailed grading plan depicting existing and proposed grades and tree saving at the time of building permit. Individual erosion control will be required on each lot. The developer has indicated that MPCA Best Management Practices will be used. This is also a requirement of the City and the Watershed District. TREE LOSS The PUD Concept Plan identified a general tree loss of 38%. The first phase tree loss is 32%. This compares favorably with the average residential tree loss in the City at 30%. A Tree Replacement Plan for 1,330 caliper inches is required. The Developer has indicated that more trees will be planted than required by the City's Tree Ordinance. Some of the trees should be replaced on the lot by lot basis and at the entrance into the project. Most of the trees will likely be placed in open areas controlled by the homeowners association and the golf course. Since the golf course is expected to be reviewed by the Planning Commission within a couple of months, the Tree Replacement Plan should be submitted concurrent with the Golf Course Phase. • 3 I,.; ( • < 0 Staff Report Bearpath - Phase I December 11, 1992 SEWER AND WATER EXTENSION The Developer has been working with the Engineering Department to determine the exact location for connection to the Metro Waste Control Sewer Intercepter located to the north of the project. The sanitary sewer plan as shown is an acceptable alternative to the sanitary sewer shown in the Southwest study. The Developer will be responsible for extending sewer through the property to the adjoining parcels expected to develop once the project is constructed. Trunk sewer will be assessed for the gross acres minus the wetlands at $3150.00 per acre. A 12 inch trunk line is needed from Dell Road at the north end of the project to Dell Road at the south end. Water stubs must be extended to serve adjacent properties. The City will credit the oversizing costs to the developer. Watermain will be extended along County Road 1 to the project site. In order to provide for fire protection, the watermain should be looped through the site. In addition, hydrants should be placed at a minimum of 300 feet apart along the street frontages. MINIMIZING WETLAND IMPACTS • The PUD Concept identified a total of 1.7 acres encroachment out of 71 acres of weti _ds. Within the first phase approximately two-tenths of one acre would be filled primarily for the 11 Road construction. The other wetlands contained within Phase I will not be altered. Mivation for encroachment into the wetland along Dell Road will occur as part of the Golf Course. Developer will comply with all Watershed, DNR and Army Corps permits and regulations, instead of the 25 foot easement around the wetlands as identified in the PUD Concept.. The Developer will plat this 25 foot dimension into an outlot with a Scenic Easement to preserve natural vegetation. PUBLIC ROAD BUILT TO CITY STANDARDS The proposed private road will be built within an outlot that is 60 feet wide for the main road and 50 feet wide for the secondary roads. Within this outlot, a 28 foot wide road will be built according to City Standards with a sidewalk along one side of the road. ROADS The developer shall provide all right of way and easements for Dell Road, provide grading and wetland mitigation. Developer shall provide right of way for Riley Lake road. The developer is responsible for grading Riley Lake Road from the Creek to CSAH 1. • • 4 C C Staff Report C Bearpath - Phase I • December 11, 1992 SHORELAND ORDINANCE There is no shoreland involved in Phase I of this project. FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE There is no Flood Plain involved with Phase I of this project. - SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS There will be a sidewalk and a trail on both sides of Dell Road and Lake Riley Road. If the private road is dedicated to the City, there will be a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk built on one side of the main interior loop road. WHAT CAN THE PLANNING COMMISSION EXPECT TO REVIEW WITH SUBSEQUENT PHASES C The Planning Commission can expect to review and subsequent phases the following: • 1. The Golf Course layout design, drainage, effective on trees, Lake Riley and Riley Creek. 2. Final construction plans for the NURP ponds. 3. A tree replacement plan. 4. Location of conservation easements on wetland areas. 5. A 215 acre open space perpetual easement to the City. 6. Looping of watermains throughout the project. 7. Dedication of outlots to the City for Park Trails and Park Property. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET The City and the Developer have been working on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for approximately 6 months. The Developer and the City have been in close contact with the 5 II/ C C Staff Report Bearpath - Phase I December 11, 1992 Agencies expected to have the most comments on the project including the Army Corp of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Department of Natural Resources, the Watershed District and Metropolitan Council. All of the major issues have been identified and discussed with these agencies and the EAW has been amended several times taken into consideration their comments. The EAW official process will begin on December 20th.. The 30 day comment review period will end on January 20th. The City Council, according to State Law, may not take a final action on the project (Developer's Agreement and/or Final Plat) until all of the comments from the agencies have been submitted to the City and the City has made a declaration of no significant environmental impacts with the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff would recommend approval of Phase I of the Bearpath Residential Development including 38 acres of rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat of 420 acres into 77 single family lots and twelve outlots based on plans dated December 11, 1992 and the Staff Report dated December 11, 1992 and subject to the following conditions: 1. The project must receive a declaration of no significant impact from the City Council prior to final approval. 2. Concurrent with second phase of the project, Developers should submit a tree replacement plan. 3. No building permits will be issued for the project until Dell Road has been constructed and sewer and water is available together with a permanent hard surface on the private road system within the project. 4. The grading limits for the project must be staked with the snow fence and appropriate erosion control installed and inspected by the City 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. 5. Developer shall be required to utilize the "Centex Tree Preservation Program" to preserve trees on a lot-by-lot basis. 6. Dedicate the 40 foot wide outlot to the City on the West side of the project for future trail. 6 c C Staff Report 410 Bearpath - Phase I December 11, 1992 7. Prior to final plat approval, detailed storm water runoff, utility, grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be provided for review by the City Engineer. 8. A detailed Memorandum of Understanding shall be prepared by the Engineering Department outlining City and Developer responsibilities regarding roads and utilities on this project. • 7 • iI tssEsoz4 Cpitonnesota Department of TransportC.on Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 MIPF OF TRP- Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to 593-8533 Telephone No. December 1, 1992 Mr. Chris Enger Director of Planning City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 In Reply refer to: New TH 212 C.S. 2762 Bearpath Golf and Country Club Pioneer Trail/Lake Riley Road Eden Prairie 411) Dear Mr. Enger: We are in receipt of the above referenced plat for our review in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03 Plats and Surveys. We find this plat acceptable for development with consideration of the following comments: • Current drainage patterns and rates of runoff should be maintained. Review by the Department of Natural Resources, the Corp. of Engineers, and the Riley-Purgatory- Bluff Creek Watershed District is required. In addition, coordination should occur between the developer, the City and Mn/DOT on wetland and floodplain impacts and mitigation. • Large amounts of traffic, between 2900 and 4000 vehicles daily depending on the extent of development (ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, 1991), will be generated by this development. Some form of traffic impact analysis should be performed to determine the impacts of this newly generated traffic on the surrounding road system, particularly at the Dell Road and new TH 212 intersection. • The City and the developer should be aware that Mn/DOT will not provide any type of noise abatement for plats submitted for approval after September 1, 1992 which may impact new TH 212. This statement reflects the agreement between Mn/DOT and the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) concerning the submittal of an indirect source permit by Mn/DOT for the construction of new TH 212. I, CiJ* ( I IT MINNESOTA� l��lll!!'"' 1990 • An Equal Opportunity Employer Page 2 Mr. Chris Enger December 1, 1992 • • With the construction of new TH 212 every effort should be made by the developer and the City to closely coordinate any and all local actions regarding this development with Mn/DOT. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 593-8533. Sincerely, VRAD.41--‘ mil. SCA.ert4 William A. Sirois Senior Transportation Planner cc: Dotty Rietow, Metropolitan Council Les Weigelt, Hennepin Co. Engineer Peter Tulkiki, Hennepin Co. • • Iq3 C C DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 HENNEPIN PHONE: (612) 930-2500 _FLFAX (612) 930-2513 TDD: (612) 930-2696 November 5, 1992 Chris Enger, Planning Director City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Enger: RE: Proposed Plat - Bearpath Golf and Country Club CSAH 1, Northeast quadrant of Lake Riley Road ` .,, i > : ;= Section 19/30, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 2028 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements to this segment of CSAH 1 the developer should dedicate 4111 an additional 17' along CSAH 1 making the right of way 50' from the center of CSAH 1. In the area of Outlot 0 the additional 17' of right of way should be dedicated north and south of the CSAH 1 centerline making the right of way corridor 100' wide. - The proposed location of the Dell Road north intersection with CSAH I meets the minimum sight distance requirements for the posted speed limit and is acceptable to Hennepin County. - Because of a small knoll just east of the Riley Lake Road/CSAH 1 intersection, this intersection does not meet the minimum sight distance requirements for the posted speed limit. The developer can relocate the Lake Riley Road/CSAH 1 intersection to a safer location or regrade the small rise so the existing intersection will meet the minimum sight distance requirements. - Any new access to a county road, a revision to an existing access or a change in land use requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2548 for entrance permit forms. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway removal , drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for utility permit forms. III/ HENNEPIN COUNTY . 'LH an equal opportunity employer s C Mr. Chris Enger November 5, 19924111 Page 2 - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, Thomas D. J hnson, P.E. Transportation Planning TDJ/LDW:Iw JANUARY 19,1993 31070 NATIONAL 1031 EXCHANGE CORP INTEREST PAYMENT FOR LAND PURCHASED 5250.04 31071 JOHN & JEAN M TEMAN INTEREST PAYMENT FOR LAND PURCHASED 1325.08 Alk1072 NATIONAL 1031 EXCHANGE CORP PRINCIPAL & INTEREST LAND PURCHASE 400295.94 073 JOHN & JEAN TEMAN PRINCIPAL & INTEREST FOR LAND PURCHASE 353604.59 31074 VOID OUT CHECK 0.00 31075 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC JANUARY 93 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 4832.13 31076 WELSH COMPANIES JANUARY 93 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 6435.47 31077 WELSH COMPANIES JANUARY 93 RENT-CITY HALL 22049.46 31078 HOMART DEVELOPMENT ROOM RENTAL-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 25.00 31079 L MCI T 1992 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 23025.00 31080 MCPOA CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 25.00 31081 MCPOA DUES-POLICE DEPT 25.00 31082 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 11.98 31083 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SEALED PLATE TABS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 51.00 31084 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE PAYROLL 12-25 & 12-31-92 7024.00 31085 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 12-25-92 250.00 31086 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 12-25-92 50186.82 31086 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 12-25-92 17537.0E 31087 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 12-31-92 7448.66 31087 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 12-31-92 14554.15 31088 HENN CTY SUPPORT PAYROLL 12-25-92 280.0C 31089 HENN CTY SUPPORT PAYROLL 12-25-92 225.6S 31090 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST PAYROLL 12-25-92 2723.7E 31091 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 12-25-92 32.00 31092 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 12-25-92 50.0C 31093 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 12-25-92 25.0C 31094 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-25-92 16133.62 31094 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-25-92 19795.11 1095 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-31-92 20.0C 1095 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-31-92 20.00 31096 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-31-92 6479.6S 31096 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-31-92 7918.1E- 31097 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-25-92 238.5S 31098 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 12-25-92 164.5C 31099 JUDY KOPP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.0C 31100 RYAN KRATOCHVIL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 20.0C 31101 KATHERINE LACEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 2.0( 31102 CARVEL LEE REFUND-ADULT PROGRAMS 21.5( 31103 LAURIE RICHARDSON REFUND-SWIMMMING LESSONS 19.0( 31104 VOID OUT CHECK 0.0( 31105 KATHLEEN ZOMORODIAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.0( 31106 MN DEPT OF REVENUE DECEMBER 92 FUEL TAX 581.0( 31107 AT & T SERVICE 260.7E 31108 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 1457.9E 31109 AT & T CONSUMER PRODUCTS SERVICE 140.0' 31110 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 55.2f 31111 DELEGARD TOOL CO -EXTENSION CORDS/WRENCHES/LEVER GUN/ 1048.8, -IMPACT TOOL/PLUGS/COUPLERS/CABLE TIES/ -RAZOR BLADES/CARGO BAR/RECHARGEABLE -LIGHTS & BATTERY PACKS-STREET MAINT/ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31112 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 14803.3; 31113 AT & T SERVICE 502.2 1114 AT & T CONSUMER PRODUCTS SERVICE 165.3: 1115 JASON NORTHCO LP #1 JANUARY 93 RENT-LIQUOR STORE 5816.1 99298991 JANUARY 19,1993 31116 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 718.65 31117 MCPOA CONFERENCE-POLICE DEPT 25.00 31118 DEPART OF LABOR & INDUSTRY LICENSE-WATER DEPT 00 31119 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTION 1 00 31120 FIRE MARSHALL ASSN OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-BUILDING INSPECTIONS 200.00 31121 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL INC .CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT 145.00 31122 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN REGISTRATION-BROOMBALL LEAGUE 154.00 31123 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN REGISTRATION-VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE 176.00 31124 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY CONFERENCE-SEWER DEPT 560.00 31125 SHERRIL BERRYMAN REFUND-GYMNASTICS LESSONS 21.00 31126 SUZANNE BOOKSTEIN REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 23.00 31127 ANNE GUTTMAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 31128 SHERIE HORUNG REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 31129 M M JOHNSON REFUND-SWIMMMING LESSONS 34.00 31130 MARK WEBER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 22.00 31131 EARL ZENT REFUND-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 30.00 31132 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-CITY HALL/PARK MAINT/SR CENTER 76.07 31133 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 6878.26 31134 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY NOV 92 LEGAL SERVICE-WETLAND PERMIT 900.00 31135 RAINBOW FLOWER SHOP EXPENSES-CITY HALL 42.60 31136 TOM TESCH EXPENSES-STREET DEPT 12.2C 31137 VERTEC INC VRIA REPEATER-POLICE FORFEITURE DRUGS 1805.57 31138 AASHTO PUBLICATION-ENGINEERING DEPT 41.50 31139 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE 33529.5S 31140 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 5612.80 31141 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 11379.71 31142 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME CO MIX .00 31143 KIRSCH DISTRIBUTING CO BEER 8C 31144 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 8 .6;: 31145 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 396.91 31146 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 236.8E 31147 POGREBA DISTRIBUTING INC BEER 75.72 31148 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 18362.3C 31149 AARP 55 ALIVE/MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 152.0C 31150 NATIONAL HIGHWAY INSTITUTE CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 500.0C 31151 MN DEPTOF AGRICULTURE LICENSE RENEWAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 20.0C 31152 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY -BATTERIES/GREASE/THERMOSTAT/GASKETS/PAINT/ 3533. -FILTERS/BRUSHES/WIRE SET/STARTER/MIRRORS/ -TRANSMISSION POINTS/FLOORMATS/PLUG/HANGER/ -SWITCHES/CALIPRS/FITTINGS/BELTS/HOSES/ -FUSE HOLDERS/DISTRIBUTOR CAPS/CONNECTORS/ -HOSE ENDS/GROMMETS/GAS CAP/COUPLERS/HEAD -LAMP/ROTORS/DUCT TAPE/PVC VALVES/EXHAUST -PIPES/ANTI-FREEZE/TURN SIGNAL LIGHTS/ -BRACKET/GAUGE/SPLASH GUARD-ENGINEERING -DEPT/PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/UTILITIES DIVISION 31153 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER 2265.4i 31154 BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS REFUND-OVERPAYMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION 192.7f 31155 RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING ASSN DUES-POLICE DEPT 100.0( 31156 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 58.0( 31157 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATER APPROPRIATION FEE-FRANLO PARK 0+ 31158 MANKATO STATE UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR .0! 31159 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER COAT RACK RENTAL-MARTIN LUTHER KING EVENT 96.5 9792251 JANUARY 19,1993 31160 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO SERVICE-1992 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATING 6044.63 31161 BROWN & CRIS INC SERVICE-EDEN HILLS 3227.61 162 IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS INC SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD/DELL ROAD 81763.09 1163 MAX JOHNSON TRUCKING SERVICE-1992 LIME SLUDGE REMOVAL & DISPOSAL 87735.43 31164 RICHARD KNUTSON INC SERVICE-GEORGE MORAN DRIVE 52106.07 31165 RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC INC -SERVICE-INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL 35618.65 SYSTEM-HWY 169/212 & LEONA RD 31166 WIDMER INC SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK WETLAND RESTORATION 8304.03 31167 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER ROTO HAMMER & BIT RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 95.34 31168 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO VHS SLEEVES-POLICE DEPT 25.77 31169 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO -UNIFORMS-FACILITIES DEPT/STREET MAINT/ 2501.66 -PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CTR/ -UTILITIES DIV/TOWEL & MATS-LIQUOR STORES 31170 AMERI-STAR LIGHTING LAMPS-STREET LIGHTING-STREET DEPT 360.00 31171 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC NAME PLATES/BRACKETS/SIGNS-STREET DEPT 2231.23 31172 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING WASTE DISPOSAL-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT 26.63 31173 DON ANDERSON JR HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 62.50 31174 ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL ASSN SERVICE-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER 67.50 31175 ARMOR SECURITY INC -LOCK REPAIR/INSTALLED LATCH GUARD/REPLACE 2406.32 PANIC BAR/INSTALLED NEW SECURITY SYSTEM 31176 ASPEN CARPET CLEANING SERVICE-CARPET CLEANING-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 350.00 31177 AUDIO ELECTRONICS INC INTERCOM REPAIR-POLICE BLDG 230.40 31178 AUDIO VISUAL WHOLESALERS -SLIDE PROJECTOR/ZOOM LENS-HISTORICAL 611.33 INTERPRETATION PROCRAI'i 31179 BACONS ELEUT IC CO -FURNISHED & INSTALLED HOUR METERS-WATER 847.95 TREATMENT PLANT 31180 PATRICIA BARKER EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 45.62 31181 S H BARLETT COMPANY INC -REPAIR KITS/ESCUTCHEONS/SCREWS-COMMUNITY 262.92 CENTER 1182 BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE INC -ROTOR/BATTERIES/WINDSHIELD SOLVENT/WIRE/ 802.23 -SNOW BRUSH/ANTI-FREEZE/BRAKE CLEANER/ BRAKE FLUID-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31183 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC -ICE RESURFACER-$49059/RENTAL SKATES 49429.4E -REPAIRED/SUCTION CUPS/COMPRESSOR OIL/ PROTECTIVE NET-COMMUNITY CENTER 31184 BIFFS INC DECEMBER 92 WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINT 98.2E 31185 DAVID BLACK MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER 15.00 31186 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 316.21 31187 BLUMBERG COMMUNICATIONS INC -APOGEE FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS UPGRADE- 4781.2i POLICE DEPT 31188 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC & MFG CO MOTOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 2802.0E 31189 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING INC SERVICE-INDIAN ROAD BRIDGE 5677.0C 31190 MAXINE BRUECK CONFERENCE-FINANCE DEPT 91.5C 31191 BRW INC SERVICE-VALLEY VIEW ROAD/DELL ROAD 18057.2E 31192 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET MAINT 365.2Z: 31193 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIOS/RADIO SYSTEM REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 1391.3( 31194 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 2181.6f 31195 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC -DECEMBER 92 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE-HUMAN 255.0( RESOURCES DEPT 31196 CENTRAIRE INC -DUCTWORK/INSTALLED HEAT PUMP/PIPING/GLYCO 10018.2, -FOR PIPING-POLICE BLDG/THERMOCOUPLER -REPLACED-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG/LINKAGE -CONNECTORS REPLACED-TECHNOLOGY DR BLDG/ 1111 EXISTING EQUIPMENT CHECKED-CPT BLDG 38120636 JANUARY 19,1993 31197 CITY OF CHANHASSEN -1992 CITYS SHARE OF BOLAND CONSULTANTS FOR 2306.40 SOUTHWEST COALITION 31198 BRUCE CLABO SCHOOL-WATER DEPT 20 31199 CLASSIC POOLS PLUS INC CHEMICALS-POOL OPERATIONS-COMMUNITY CENTER 96 31200 CLEAN SWEEP INC PARK LOT STRIPING-COMMUNITY CENTER 568.08 31201 DWIGHT CLEMENT SCHOOL-UTILITIES DIVISION 150.75 31202 CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SER INC -PURGE KIT/BEARING/BRAKE LINING/HOSES/ 283.34 FITTINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31203 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS SERVICE-REMODELING CPT BLDG FOR CIVIC CTR 43685.68 31204 CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS-POOL MAINTENANCE/COMMUNITY CENTER 110.50 31205 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS BASEMENT REMODELING-POLICE BUILDING 8570.00 31206 COPIES NOW -PRINTING FLYERS/FORMS-HUMAN RESOURCES 221.77 DEPT/ENGINEERING DEPT/POLICE DEPT 31207 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT 152.28 31208 JEFFREY CORDES MILEAGE-FORESTRY DEPT 16.25 31209 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC -LINE MARKER W/HAND SPRAYER & HOSE-PARK 1517.62 MAINTENANCE 31210 DALCO -CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/ 242.81 COMMUNITY CENTER 31211 DATASTREAM SYSTEMS INC -SIDEARM/MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE SUPPORT- 1010.00 FACILITIES DEPT 31212 DAY-TIMERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER 22.18 31213 DE-SIGNER SIGNS-STREET DEPT 97.98 31214 EUGENE DIETZ DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 200.00 31215 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY OCTOBER 92 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL 929.52 31216 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPT BOAT JACK/EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 304.60 31217 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISION -DECEMBER 92 PEST CONTROL SERVICES-FIRE 111.82 STATIONS 31218 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD CIRCUIT-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 32 31219 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 -CITYS SHARE DIVERSITY & DISCRIMINATION 1 5i -TOWN MTG-$1073/WASTE DISPOSAL-SENIOR CENTER 31220 EDEN PRAIRIE TIRE & AUTO SVC TUBE/TIRE REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43.9E 31221 EDENBLOOM FLORAL EXPENSES-LIQUOR STORE 63.9( 31222 EDINA S W PLUMBING -INSTALLED LAUNDRY TUB & STAND PIPE-FIRE 300.0( STATION 31223 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 125.0( 31224 EGGHEAD SOFTWARE LOTUS SOFTWARE-FIRE DEPT 357.82 31225 ENVIRO-CON HAY BALES-DRAINAGE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 106.5( 31226 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 46.52 31227 ESI COMMUNICATIONS INC COMMUNICATION LINES REPAIRED-POLICE DEPT 624.0( 31228 TIMOTHY J ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 25.0( 31229 C 0 FIELD COMPANY SERVICE-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER 9975.0( 31230 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME CO SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 108.0( 31231 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE-PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 53.2f 31232 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE -1ST AID RESCUE EQUIPMENT/HOSE REEL RACKS- 3183.4E $2987-FIRE DEPT 31233 G & K SERVICES -TOWELS-PARK MAINT/COVERALLS & TOWELS- 696.1E WATER DEPT 31234 CHARLES A GOBLE EMERGENCY TECHNICIAN BAGS-FIRE DEPT 106.5E 31235 W W GRAINGER INC -STEPLADDER/HUMIDIGUIDE/BATTERIES- 232.8: FACILITIES DEPT 31236 GRAY LINE MPLS/ST PAUL BUS SERVICE-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID 570.0E 31237 GRAYBOW DANIELS CO TIP TAP UNIT-COMMUNITY CENTER Allk7i 31238 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC -RELOCATED PARKING LOT LIGHT POLE- 5 .3: -COMMUNITY CENTER/EXHAUST FAN REPAIR- 8455672 4 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31239 MICHAEL W HAMILTON BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 90.00 31240 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-MILLER PARK/RIVERVIEW RD/BRAXTON 25738.78 DR/CREEK KNOLLS/MEADE LANE 41111241 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FILING FEES-PLANNING DEPT 288.75 1242 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 10422090420 2124.80 31243 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF NOVEMBER 92 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT 241.11 31244 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER NOVEMBER 92 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 2726.83 31245 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 607.85 31246 STEVE HIGLEY VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 288.00 31247 HOLMSTEN ICE RINKS INC COMPRESSOR MOTOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER 438.40 31248 LAURA HUBERTY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 16.00 31249 IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS INC SERVICE-MILLER PARK 77377.50 31250 INACOMP COMPUTER CENTERS LASER PRINTER REPAIR-POLICE DEPT 340.06 31251 GARY ISAACS OFFICIALS COORDINATOR/FEES PAID 160.00 31252 LYNNETTE ISAACS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 24.00 31253 J & R RADIATOR CORP RADIATOR REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 68.00 31254 JOHNSON CONTROLS FILTERS-COMMUNITY CENTER 162.00 31255 E F JOHNSON CO -RADIO COMMUNICATION CONSOLE MODIFICATION- 3681.57 POLICE DEPT 31256 ELYCE KASTIGAR MILEAGE-AQUATIC & FITNESS PROGRAMS 30.00 31257 KEEPEM ALIVE INC CPR TRAINING-SAFETY DEPT 1350.00 31258 KLEVE HTG & AIR CONDITIONING INC -INSTALLED SUPPLY & RELIEF VENT/EXHAUST 772.0C FAN-POLICE BUILDING 31259 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR DOOR REPAIR-POLICE BUILDING 226.55 31260 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 292.84 31261 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC LEVER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 80.20 31262 LAMETT YS COLLISION -REPAIR & PAINT BLAZER & SEDAN-EQUIPMENT 1394.45 MAINTENANCE 31263 CINDY LANENBERG MILEAGE/SCHOOL-FIRE DEPT 122.42 11111264 LANO EQUIPMENT INC -ELEMENT/OIL/MOTOR FAN REPP.IR-EQUIPMENT 50.35 MAINTENANCE 31265 ALLEN R LARSON ANTENNA/ADAPTER-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 19.81 31266 BECKY LESKE MILEAGE-SKATING RINKS 34.6C 31267 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC REPAIR & PAINT VEHICLE-EQUIPMENT MAINT 686.6C 31268 LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SOFTWARE UPGRADE-PLANNING DEPT 126.7Z 31269 LYMAN LUMBER CO LUMBER-PARK MAINTENANCE 37.3E 31270 MAPCO GAS PRODUCTS INC PROPANE CYLINDERS-OUTDOOR CENTER 383.0; 31271 MARTIN-MCALLISTER STRESS TESTS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 300.0( 31272 MASYS CORPORATION -SOFTWARE INSTALLATION & TRAINING-POLICE 5633.5C DEPT 31273 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE-POLICE DEPT 51.1: 31274 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-COMMUNITY CENTER 11.8r 31275 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT - 20.9E 31276 AHMAD MCGOWAN BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 24.0C 31277 MCNEILUS STEEL INC CHANNELS/FLANGE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 293.9: 31278 JULIE MEINZER SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT 911.9i 31279 MENARDS -UNDERCOURSE/CLAMPS/SPREADER/ICE MELT/ 216.8E -OUTLET CONVERTER/SCREWDRIVER BITS/MASON -BITS/ROPE/TAPE MEASURE/FIBERGLASS/BLADES/ -PLIERS/MALLET/DRILL BIT SET-STREET MAINT/ PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/COMMUNITY CTR 31280 METRO SALES INC DEVELOPER/SILICONE OIL-COMMUNITY CENTER 158.1: 31281 METRO SYSTEMS -TASKLIGHT/TACKBOARD/OVERDESK CABINET/3 2004.3, FILE CABINETS-POLICE DEPT 411112960732 31282 METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL -HOT WATER HEATER & INSTALLATION-COMMUNITY 3280.00 CENTER 31283 MID-CO SECURITY SYSTEMS INC REPLACED MONITORS-POLICE DEPT 219.03 31284 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO STEEL PLATE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 22.04 31285 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ 11073 SENIOR CENTER 31286 MIDWEST TELETRON INC HEADSET-CITY HALL 95.50 31287 HERMAN MILLER INC KEYBOARD TRAY-ASSESSING DEPT 90.95 31288 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 279.85 31289 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT 358.75 31290 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY RAMP/CHROME END CAPS-FIRE DEPT 72.64 31291 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADS-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 199.50 31292 MINNESOTA WANNER CO -RATCHET WHEEL/LOCKING ASSEMBLY/SPRING/ 509.70 REWIND HOSE REEL-POLICE BUILDING 31293 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING-MEMBERSHIP CARDS-COMMUNITY CENTER 259.41 31294 MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE BOND SERVICE-CPT ACQUISITION 13000.00 31295 WM MUELLER & SONS INC SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 1366.00 31296 MUNICILITE CO FLASH TUBES/SPOT LIGHTS-EQUIPMENT MAINT 374.29 31297 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE POLAROID FILM-ASSESSING DEPT 360.50 31298 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-SKATING RINKS 67.94 , 31299 JAN NELSON MINUTES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SERVICES COMMISSION 100.00 31300 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRIC SERVICE-CITYS SHARE ENGINEERING STUDY OF 5946.73 31301 NORTH CONTRY PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL-COMMUNITY CENTER BIRCH LK PK 85.20 31302 NORTH STAR ICE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 518.58 31303 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC DIP STICK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6.20 31304 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT 488.86 31305 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC CABLE/CLIPS-PARK MAINTENANCE 40.68 31306 PAPER WAREHOUSE -ROLLS OF TABLE COVER/CANDLES/NAPKINS/ 97.44 PLATES/CUPS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/FIRE DEPT 31307 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY SEAT CUSHION REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4110C 31308 PEAK STAFFING MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 5C 31309 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC FLOW CONTROL VALVE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .7 31310 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADMINISTRATION 30.7E 31311 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC -REPAIRED HALLWAY LIGHTS/INSTALLED FIXTURE- 1295.2E- -FIRE STATIONS/REPAIRED EXTERIOR LIGHTS- -EATON BLDG/INSTALLED FIXTURES-TECHNOLOGY DR BLDG/DRYER RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER 31312 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 2 LAWN MOWERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 730.5z 31313 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING -ENVELOPES-ASSESSING DEPT/FLYER & 697.8E NEWSLETTER-SENIOR CENTER 31314 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE 9524.9C 31315 THE PROMOTION GROUP BASEBALL JACKETS-SAFETY INCENTIVE PROGRAM 126.8C 31316 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC -TELEPHONE REPAIR-FIRE STATION/PUBLIC WORK 160.00 BUILDING 31317 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC -INSTALLED FILTERS & HOUSING ON UNLEADED 99.9: DISPENSERS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31318 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC DECEMBER 92 WASTE DISPOSAL 0.0C 31319 QUIK-KUF INC HAND CUFFS-POLICE DEPT 134.9C 31320 R & R SPECIALTIES INC -ANALYZED ZAMBONI EXHAUST/BLADES SHARPENED/ 178.8C ROTORS-COMMUNITY CENTER 31321 RAINBOW FOODS EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 82.8: 31322 TED C REIN HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 40.0( 31323 RITZ CAMERA FILM-PLANNING DEPT 23.4- 31324 KRIS ROEGLIN AFTERSCHOOL CONNECTION INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAI 91.0( 4301579 JANUARY 19.1993 31325 ROGERS SERVICE -ALTERNATORS/ALTERNATORS REPAIRED/STARTER 454.43 REPAIRED-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 41111326 ROOF SPEC INC -SERVICE-INFRARED MOISTURE SURVEY-CPT BLDG 1680.00 ACQUISITION 31327 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC BALLOON WEIGHTS-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 31.95 31328 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES/SNOW MELT-FACILITIES 1136.93 DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER 31329 SUSAN SCOTT BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 51.00 31330 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY MARKERS/EXIT SIGNS-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG 117.71 31331 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC -SERVICE-COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION- 18.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31332 SHINGOBEE BUILDERS INC -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER 2ND ICE SHEET/ 155615.75 COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT 31333 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO MOTOR-COMMUNITY CENTER 28.61 31334 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC LUMBER-STUDS-STREET LIGHTING DEPT 170.40 31335 RANDY L SLICK SCHOOL-ENGINEERING DEPT 262.60 31336 W GORDON SMITH CO GAS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 7.78 31337 SOFTWARE ETC -WORDPERFECT SOFTWARE-ADMINISTRATION DEFT/ 1537.85 -PARK & RECREATION DEPT/BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/PLANNING DEPT 31338 SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT BUS SERVICE-SENIOR PROGRAMS 24.00 31339 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES 198.00 31340 SPACE CONSTRUCTION INC REPLACED EXTERIOR DOOR-POLICE GARAGE 440.00 31341 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/WATER DEPT 526.0Z 31342 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -PINS/SEALS/RETAINERS/BUSHINGS/SPRINGS/ 569.2C -PULSATOR/PUMP/FILTER/MANIFOLD/VALVE/ -STUDS/SWITCH/MASTER CYLINDER/WEATHER STRIPPING-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Iiit343 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 240.00 14,4 TARGET STORES -FILM-POLICE DEPT/TABLE TENNIS PADDLES/ 272.7i -RACQUETBALL RACQUETS & BALLS-COMMUNITY CENTER 31345 KATHERINE TEKIELA -AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR/CRAFT 539.5C INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 31346 TOLL COMPANY GLOVES/HELIUM-PARK MAINTENANCE 77.0+ 31347 RON TOSKEY BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 51.0C 31348 TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE BLADES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56.2z 31349 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC CRAFT SUPPLIES-ACTIVITY CAMP PROGRAM 16.1: 31350 TWIN CITY FLORIST SUPPLY INC RIBBON-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 36.0C 31351 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO ACETYLENE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31.2z 31352 U S WEST COMMUNICATION SERVICES INSTALLED NEW LINE-POLICE DEPT 372.3E 31353 UNITED LABORATORIES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 506.& 31354 TRIA D VIKESLAND MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 48.6C 31355 VIKING LABORATORIES INC CHEMICALS-POOL MAINT-COMMUNITY CENTER 340.4E 31356 VOSS LIGHTING -LIGHT BULBS-FACILITIES DEPT/STREET 587.5� LIGHTING-STREET DEPT 31357 W S A INC PYREX SHEETS/TEMPERED GLASS-PARK MAINT 203.8( 31358 WATERPRO -102 100 GAL 5/8X3/4 METERS-$5202/2 1000 9188.9: -GAL METERS-$266/4 1 1/2 1000 GAL METERS- -$1268/100 COPPERHORNS-$1800/GASKETS/ GENERATORS-WATER DEPT 31359 WEST WELD WIRE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 274.7( 31360 WINTZ COMPANIES COPY PAPER-COMMUNITY CENTER 37.5( 101361 WARREN WOLF DIAGONAL CUTTER-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 25.0i 362 YOUNG AUDIENCES OF MINNESOTA -AFRICAN-AMERICAN STORYTELLING EVENT- 200.O( HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMISSION 17597589 31363 TRACEY ZACHMAN MILEAGE-ELECTIONS DEPT/FINANCE DEPT 13.25 31364 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 1ST AID SUPPLIES-PARK MAINT/COMMUNITY CTR 106.86 31365 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER -CORE DRILLING MACHINE & BIT RENTAL-PAR 73.78 MAINTENANCE 31366 AIRSIGNAL INC -JANUARY 93 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/FIRE 41 DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER 31367 ASCAP ENTERTAINMENT LICENSE FEE-COMMUNITY CENTER 412.50 31368 ARMOR SECURITY INC -1ST QTR 93 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 165.18 AGREEMENT-OUTDOOR CENTER 31369 ASSN OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITI 1993 DUES-CITY COUNCIL 5889.00 31370 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY MEETING EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 66.00 31371 THE BINDERY INC CALENDARS-POLICE DEPT 115.02 31372 BRC ELECTIONS-MIDWEST CO -ELECTION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 4410.00 ELECTIONS DEPT 31373 DECORATIVE DESIGNS JANUARY 93 SERVICE-CITY HALL 50.30 31374 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY AIR TANK LICENSE-FIRE STATION 10.00 31375 GOAL/QPC BOOK-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 29.95 31376 MICHAEL W HAMILTON BROOMBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 128.00 31377 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-GOLF VIEW SIDEWALK 48.87 31378 INTL ASSN OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PLAN DUES-POLICE DEPT 40.00 31379 KNOWLEDGE CIRCLE INC SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 135.00 31380 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 239.80 31381 DAVID LINDAHL PRINTER ADAPTER-PLANNING DEPT 4.95 31382 MASYS CORPORATION -JANUARY 93 COMPUTER HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 1476.70 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 31383 JEAN MATTIACCI VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 64.00 31384 MEMA TREASURER DUES-POLICE DEPT 50.00 31385 MENARDS -KEY SET/DOOR STOP KICKDOWNS/SUCTION CUPS/ 27.71 LAG SHIELD/ROPES-COMMUNITY CENTER 31386 MIDWEST TELETRON INC HEADSET REPAIR-CITY HALL 00 31387 DUANE MIELKE HAY BALES-PARK MAINTENANCE 00 31388 MN CHAPTER: OF IAPMO DUES-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 70.00 31389 PARAGON CABLE MPLS JANUARY 93 SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 3.29 31390 PC WORLD SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 19.97 31391 SELA ROOFING REPLACE ROOF-HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 8620.00 31392 STANDARD REGISTER -ENDORSER & ENCODER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 666.00 FINANCE DEPT 31393 TOMAS HARDY PIANO TUNING PIANO TUNING-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT 50.00 31394 VICOM INC -JANUARY 93 WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 7.00 COMMUNITY CENTER 31395 TRIA D VIKESLAND MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM 26.4E 31396 ZONING BULLETIN BIWEEKLY SUBSCRIPTION-PLANNING DEPT 79.81 30694 VOID OUT CHECK 289.17 30792 VOID OUT CHECK 337.00 30847 VOID OUT CHECK 7325.3t 30923 VOID OUT CHECK 1620.0C 30993 VOID OUT CHECK 42.4C 31038 VOID OUT CHECK 10.6C 31054 VOID OUT CHECK 1800.0( 1214331 $1917417.8: I G 1992 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 288608.14 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 23654.62 15 LIQUOR STORE - P V M 17106.41 17 LIQUOR STORE - PRESERVE 10045.11 18 LIQUOR STORE - PRAIRIEVIE 19443.32 21 POLICE FORFEITURE 25.38 22 STATE AID CONST 53193.64 28 COMMUNITY BLDG FUND 59092.68 37 C/C 2ND SHEET ICE 155615.75 39 92 PARK REF IMP 98507.00 60 IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 3227.61 62 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 109019.05 73 WATER FUND 107583.61 77 SEWER FUND 518.11 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 161.73 90 TAX INCREMENT CONSTRUCTIO 43202.68 $989004.84 1993 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 4100 GENERAL 141080.35 15 LIQUOR STORE - P V M 5841.23 17 LIQUOR STORE - PRESERVE 4832.13 18 LIQUOR STORE - PRAIRIEVIEW 6675.27 73 WATER FUND 19.56 77 SEWER FUND 723.40 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 145.38 87 CDGB FUND 8620.00 90 TAX INCREMENT CONST 760475.65 $92841297 • • MEMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: November 12, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposed Trapping Ordinance The issue of trapping and use of leg hold traps within the City was discussed last January and February by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Following those discussions, it was decided that a subcommittee be formed to review the State's trapping law and review alternatives that may be considered in the drafting of an ordinance for the City of Eden Prairie. Starting in March persons interested in serving on the subcommittee were invited to do so with commissioners Lynch and Bowman serving as co-chairs for the meetings. The staff solicited information from surrounding communities and combined that with the information from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)Conservation Officer and presented the information to the subcommittee members. Usingthis information, the subcommittee went to workon draftingsome guidelines that could o be used for inclusion in a trapping ordinance. This list of recommendations and suggestions was given to the City Attorney's office and an ordinance was drafted by the attorney's staff. The subcommittee reviewed four revisions of the proposed trapping ordinance and the final draft was reviewed on October 21, 1992. RECOMMENDATION: The subcommittee recommended passage of the ordinance regulating the trapping of animals within the City of Eden Prairie. Attached for the commission's information is an addendum to the proposed trapping ordinance that was signed by two members of the trapping subcommittee. SAF:mdd trap/stu S iU�J ADDENDUM TO PROPOSED TRAPPING ORDINANCE, 10/21/92 • In response to an article in an Eden Prairie newspaper about a cat that was caught in a leghold trap and because of their concern over possible injury to children and non-target animals,the Eden Prairie City Council requested that the Parks, Recreation,and Natural Resources Commission review Eden Prairie's current trapping ordinance. The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission empowered a committee to study this issue. While this committee has taken many positive steps, its proposed ordinance has left the trapping situation in Eden Prairie essentially unchanged; i.e., recreational trapping is still allowed. The ordinance simply adds a requirement to obtain a permit before trapping and restricts the allowable areas for trapping to the locations where trapping is currently occurring. The Eden Prairie City Council's initial concern remains a distinct possibility —that a child, pet, protected bird of prey, or other non-target animal will be severely injured by a leghold trap. The proposed regulation does not address the leghold trap's fundamental drawback, its inherent non-selectivity. The argument heard over and over again by this committee from trapping proponents was a concern for a possible loss of Eden Prairie residents' livelihood if recreational trapping were banned. However,in a records search conducted at the Hennepin County Government Center, no trapping license was issued to an Eden Prairie resident for the 1991/1992 trapping season. The committee's pro-trapping representative, an Eden Prairie resident, even stated that his own trapping was a "hobby." The committee itself was unanimous in agreeing that the proposed ordinance will have to be reevaluated in a few years due to the expansion of residential areas within the city and the acquisition of additional land by the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. The committee also agreed that the restriction of trapping will eventually give way to a ban on trapping,simply because trapping is no longer practicable in a suburban area. We recommend that the City of Eden Prairie save itself the implementation and maintenance costs associated with a permit program and the additional costs for reevaluating the program periodically, and instead proceed directly to instituting a ban on recreational leghold trapping. We also encourage • the city to deal with human vs. animal conflicts in a humane manner on a case-by-case basis,using the many non-lethal alternatives available. We urge that Eden Prairie join other metropolitan communities such as Bloomington and Edina in banning the leghold trap outright. Note that areas that have banned the leghold trap have not shown an increase in nuisance complaints. The city of Bloomington has banned trapping (except for the use of humane box traps) since 1969. In a March 16, 1979 letter to the Mayor of Burnsville, the Bloomington Animal Warden, Kenneth Brachmann, stated: "We have found that our major complaints of damage and annoyance are of squirrels and racoons, but this has not increased in all the years that we have banned steel-jaw traps." CCM e.,"17- -17\ ." Charlotte Cozzetto Linda Hatfield Eden Prairie resident Trapping committee member Trapping committee member Issues Coordinator, FATE member Friends of Animals and Their Environment (FATE) • 1 LJ • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 BY ADDING SECTION 9.12, A PROVISION REGULATING THE TRAPPING OF ANIMALS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The Eden Prairie City Code shall be amended by adding thereto a Section 9.12 which reads as follows: SECTION 9.12. TRAPPING OF ANIMALS. Subd. 1. Policy. This Section reflects the City's policy of managing wildlife while maintaining the natural habitat of the area. This policy includes the City's desire to mitigate the exposure of people and domestic animals to traps. Public education concerning the various species living in the area and their habits is the preferred method of minimizing any conflict between humans and wildlife. The city recognizes, however, that even with a knowledgeable and sensitive citizenry, circumstances arise where trapping becomes a necessary method of control. • Subd. 2. Definitions. A. "Trap" means any mechanical device, snare, artificial light, net, bird line, vehicle or contrivance used to trap, catch, snare, kill or otherwise restrain the free movement of any animal, wildlife or bird. B. "Trapping" means setting, laying, or otherwise using a trap to catch, snare, kill or otherwise restrain the free movement of animals, wildlife or birds. Subd. 3. Permit Required. It is unlawful for any person to engage in the practice of trapping without first having obtained a permit therefor from the City Police Department. A. Application for a City trapping permit shall take place pursuant to the requirements contained in Section 5.02 of this Code and shall be submitted to the City Police Department. Additionally, applicants shall submit proof of a current license for trapping from the Department of Natural Resources and of a passing score on the test administered by the Minnesota Trappers Association. Subd. 4. Permitted Area. Trapping by City permit shall be conducted only in the following areas: Ilk 10,1 • C A. Rural land of five acres or more, located south of County Road 1 (Pioneer Trail). with owner's permission. B. Trapping by permit is prohibited either upon or within 100 feet of the boundaries of any city park or organized recreational area. Subd. 5. Permitted Traps. Trapping on defined permitted land is restricted to the use of padded leg hold spring traps. Trapping in water in defined permitted areas is restricted to the use of conibear and drowning set padded leg hold traps. All permitted traps shall be maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications. Subd. 6. Sales. The sale of any unpadded leg hold, spring or snare trap in the City is prohibited. Any person engaged in the selling of traps within the city shall post a copy of this Section at the location where the business license is displayed. �. Subd. 7. Release of Animals. Animals may be released from captivity only with the express permission of the owner of the property upon which any release shall take place. Subd. 8. Exceptions. This section shall not apply to: A. Quick-kill trapping if the traps are designed to kill rats, mice, gophers or moles. B. Persons using cage-type live traps for trapping animals causing damage to property. C. Employees or duly authorized representatives of the city, county, state or federal government acting within the course and scope of their employment. D. Falconers licensed by the Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. E. Persons using a net for trapping and relocating Canadian geese under a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 5.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. 2 • 150 FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 41111 day of , 1992, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said Council on the day of , 1992. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1992. tas'ep\epcode'ci tycode • • 3 15 • 4110 January 7, 1993 Mayor Doug Tenpas City Of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Mayor Tenpas: In response to an article in an Eden Prairie newspaper about a cat that was caught in a leghold trap and because of their concern over possible injury to children and non-target animals, the Eden Prairie City Council requested that the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission review Eden Prairie's current trapping ordinance. The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission empowered a committee to study this issue, and the committee has recently produced a proposed trapping ordinance. As members of the trapping committee,we feel that the committee has taken many positive steps. However, we also feel that the proposed ordinance has left the trapping situation in Eden Prairie essentially unchanged; i.e., recreational trapping is still allowed. The ordinance simply adds a requirement to obtain a permit before trapping and restricts the allowable areas for trapping to the locations where trapping is currently occurring. The Eden Prairie City Council's initial concern remains a distinct possibility —that a child, pet, protected bird of prey, or other non-target animal will be severely injured by a leghold trap. The proposed regulation does not address the leghold trap's fundamental drawback, its inherent non-selectivity. The argument heard over and over again by the committee from trapping proponents was a concern for a possible loss of Eden Prairie residents' livelihood if recreational trapping were banned. However, in a records search conducted at the Hennepin County Government Center, no trapping license was issued to an Eden Prairie resident for the 1991/1992 trapping season. The committee's pro-trapping representative,an Eden Prairie resident, even stated that his own trapping was a "hobby." The committee itself was unanimous in agreeing that the proposed ordinance will have to be reevaluated in a few years due to the expansion of residential areas within the city and the acquisition of additional land by the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge. The committee also agreed that the restriction of trapping will eventually give way to a ban on trapping, simply because trapping is no longer practicable in a suburban area. We recommend that the City of Eden Prairie save itself the implementation and maintenance costs associated with a permit program and the additional costs for reevaluating the program periodically, and instead proceed directly to instituting a ban on Continued from page 1 • recreational leghold trapping. (This ban would not in any way limit the power of the Animal Control department to deal with "nuisance" animals.) We also encourage the city to deal with human vs. animal conflicts in a humane manner on a case-by-case basis, using the many non-lethal alternatives available. We urge that Eden Prairie join other metropolitan communities such as Bloomington and Edina in banning the leghold trap outright. Note that areas that have banned the leghold trap have not shown an increase in nuisance complaints. The city of Bloomington has banned trapping (except forthe use of humane box traps) since 1969. In a March 16, 1979 letter to the Mayor of Burnsville, the Bloomington Animal Warden, Kenneth Brachmann, stated: "We have found that our major complaints of damage and annoyance are of squirrels and racoons, but this has not increased in all the years that we have banned steel-jaw traps." V< Charlotte Cozzetto Linda Hatfield Trapping committee member Trapping committee member • • ,Nt '4-gtil -,?.-----s4.‘. 40 I OPPOSE THE USE OF THE LEG-HOLD TRAP IN EDEN PRAT` I Name Address a, .. .44:441/51 _..e 'r -. 11e6,)..A.476t/Litt/ ) ..7 `71f ' / .4.C. _ 7i-74 ,__r 4,4/,..c.4.-- - irc:(-7 bileArfk------ 74, G/ / ` tki_ _ ..... ,,,„, / i„:1-cz-/-r,<---g - c (1'c' ci4 --- -, ' -. 1. — • ' ( i ,l1) /ice;/ , -et444 t, �c ' i ,„r i'''' ''' ../i/ ji.„14.7,,,e, q) q) !__Jc .17;122‘,..L' ,,a-,,,,,-e. CI,P / s 7.- ' Xi& ,74_,/.4Jd-le-- / 5/(IP— I/,/#' 7" --ir_-)2, --1. ,t ,� ec ET t-L.1-- -is c- A-,-Q, ii Lk G k l k • 0CK:1 4A, t_k tirAc:'Y -f6a \I; it . 42.4S �r t�.P i^/1, � 1 A) ),( 13/) 1 --I 575 \► ', 11 ca c 0 r : i P - L2, -' ) .1 C) t\ , .JJ tcy/14, \H 'k) F-DU'tici. p C_J.)00_A5c)c cL-_' ? i tec, /1).tfod--ci ici<45_C‘ ;11/-SfP ld‘L.; i ' , ,, • 1 '�� it � i �k��(�� t', If Lac . //i - /kr �l/�I'1 Q- , / Pt? J 4. - �� `_ F,{ R `J.4• i III, 1 I 1 JO. I OPPOSE THE USE OF THE LEG-HOLD TRAP IN EDEN PRAIRIE Name Address ' — ?‘i..,,,,..-",CZ.L.-- `114/IV 33 ThG'Le• L'L r- i t( a- 14' 46N1 �� c C c ' 4/l / 3 3L3 C6k-li�V . - ,/ J ,,, I !:�_1.✓-1---- 1 L! _ ,� I ram.:_ :�,.) c- ( i / -''"?),_.F----y—L._ i'11 ,____ 11-0,"3-1 (,)..Z-cii,e ; rt.,-c /L- . p (.1. �1,.. i,„ P-i 1.;,-x4--. 141, 9 v 'a',; J�-- (�- AA - P • . r ,J1 ^ 'il + \N F - C�f 1 [ Y, I ; 1 IC c__ 1 ;\{�c�J Dr 1> J i . 4://,,,i,-- izd-ccj eq...f&/ i /(1...:---;c---C. /a -., ` ��` +\ ^1 - :s �t",�-\,. \I .,A., �;� .Y l4 I` Cs '. N..'-\\,.•:,� -,_.y ^,-„. . . s LA V''----,/ _.- /1------- ‘"/ . / /-717. el tA j Ck.T I-,c. (.2.-C ? E.P 4� ��t%( Jam(.CcLc 5; .r(a ''��i.:- u? F. l% • • 1 /i l_. - ^ J �/t'�1 / I�'j.1-2< --./!� // (---t-a- '72 ./ 2 1 r ,`\, . (, l )' './%//71/% y• c'/J/' t? a G.:c ic, "7-C. / /------r ,..- -' -' ' ,.::%;;17:?ST ., ,,c_.'c.-6 X-61 ' ,_ S i C) AiL'< • 72‹.-e-i' ---7 - ) 1 C"-L. A _r/- __..._,. aq t::\.H. 147,\P 0 . , MAIL, ?Th7Ls iii_f/ -717,7,.. AA_ . . .. . ::,-,,,,,-*.-: 1 -,.,, — 4.-_-' ,-::::-_-L--;,, . - _ , , ,- _) , .. _. _ ,r ' ,13 -- _ -� tipI/ • X 1*- :- " V. ?:t- ''A- ;0' I OPPOSE THE USE OF THE LEG-HOLD TRAP IN EDEN PRAI• r Name Address .`, -71'7/1 ( Jo f c fine '6,i(cg HC )a7'h1A Atic Go J . i , `r0� „ sk J 0 ( I1 ii x r(4 , kr've 1.1�,. tektif7kto Xzi -t_7 , 4-. :Tak,,e4..(_Tiq. /5 /V 7 nkk&C - . ,,_,., r � � EV.,17,Z , , � /,;1 , - 1 • - ri-,SIC H-7 a__ , -P j )U I� 0S t( V^ XJ 553' 6)�v��� ?til,-- A, L-- 1 ( LeuF.? v? _/ 'r7,,,tern j ,F` A/ -74 .0 ;-_, • •. , ;, -4w t �' ,575-3 9tal_ qt, ' gui 0 6 1-k amf0-(\, , 5 p S s'3 7 - f. " ' e /z,,-.</\ yOC � �./(1i , Ey1 • 5-j 4/7 ::. , F - /7)-7-27 , -,...---) , .... e _fi , L. c-.. ...-., •-viiiiy -r2/1, -- , d&-/,-.9L-) rl A. ( u. , (17 I�/L to �; '(1: �L 1 19'3 -4-+.w�r-1`J, CJ.` J ��4- }yr x ___ _:../h,v . , ,,7 ,, ,--.- ., ,,, ,Fe ‘) 2a,..,.._ /,,, L., c_f-7- - ,... .------..c.,%. ,6 -c <e.,-,c)-...7 --;(‘-.-..„__....t4,._. 4..e. „F., ,./ x ' 1-4''(.. �...)- .. r� 4/e �/� .COY_, A4 - ,. . _ ,- -.:.v _ S4:.ram C�uG�f ���r- �w.. ice ., -� ' •..�. ' ..r.,,, - -4 'IT ,,:tv . _ ,,.... ,3? .:, - : �., • 1+ I OPPOSE THE USE OF THE LEG-HOLD TRAP IN EDEN PRAIRIE Name Address :• .-ijkle, d. / 4(7 r...)/0 4.,,142.,%--6c41,_ (j..1-,c . -77d .e,;, , it: r /1 -() / L.,4',P)c— , //720 F3e5" /<zi. .*-1_ F'_/ 144 .r.,,i. /1,0,/-.:47)-21 ',.2 3 e/ W rr a in-hc( ((r P 44,1 , �/", ..,:,u/ :�,3{ 1 e,'l,-,C, - E.,‘) • --2.-a-. ---.1 -E t.2._d-,-'' 8Z/.5' 7'eZ-z-Cr ci,Lct- ,L I __7)- ,liv-i--1/,`Qii/ip-7,4_ Olio 1,1--:. r f) g )1 )i a tt., F. o II}J`i,n Pun 1+31L ,(1 P. No\r\e C) t-. cy, nor. ,I.-2(-) :1Y1 rk cql e ( • :.;;-. . ,. T ;0► I OPPOSE THE USE OF THE LEG-HOLD TRAP IN EDEN PRA! Name Address .• 3ty /;-60 42-17k' 2 /7 4ae-�:7I..,,: C.�- _ 4;;' /dff-- , --,-WW -,-/- tda/ del (l.: 4.6. F-e /",n_a 4tit_.. ._ r.z_ez7 4 L .L) -7 c_ ,1a71 )7 P/// l . E- f e..„..__71 e 4..e...f..„ ..,_ - -) ---/ fti :ic z, ei/ n," r_:._.-i? • . iitilli :N S. y . I lye •• " • MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission City Council Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: January 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Hidden Ponds Trails BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a November 9th letter from Bob Lambert to Hidden Ponds homeowners, a November 12th memorandum to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission regarding the Hidden Ponds Outlot A Subdivision request and a November 25th survey sent to 252 property owners in Hidden Ponds 1st and 2nd subdivisions. Also attached is a copy of the November 16th Parks Commission meeting at which many members of the Hidden Ponds 1st and 2nd Addition discussed their support or opposition to the trails system in those two subdivisions. At that meeting, Lambert suggested that the city survey all of the residents in both subdivisions to determine support and opposition to the trail system or to help make a decision on the future of those trails. RESULTS OF SURVEY: A copy of the survey for both subdivisions is attached with the total responses noted under each question. The following is a summary of the responses from the Hidden Ponds 1st Addition: 1. The first question asked for the respondent to fill in the address of their lot in order to note on the large exhibit map, the location of those individuals who supported and opposed the trail. Many people pointed out that the decisions for Hidden Ponds One may not necessarily be the right decisions for Hidden Ponds Two. Fifty-nine of the seventy- eight lots (76%) responded in Hidden Ponds 1st Addition, while ninety-two of the one hundred and eighty lots (51%) responded in the 2nd Addition. 2. Staff recommendation is to remove all of the existing asphalt trails that have deteriorated 1111 to a dangerous condition. There are significant stretches of the trail system that remain in fairly decent condition and may best be repaired and maintained with a simple overlay; Hidden Ponds Trails January 8, 1993 • however other portions of the trail system will have to be removed and possibly replaced with a soft surface trail material if the trail is in low wet lands. Thirty-seven of the fifty- nine (63%) respondents supported replacing trails whenever possible. Twenty-two opposed. 3. Staff estimated that the "approximate" cost to replace a trail would be $30,000. If this were assessed over a ten year period, the cost per household would be about$19 for the first year, $17.50 for the second etc. Thirty-five respondents (59%1 indicated they would be willing to be assessed for trail improvements. Twenty-two indicated they would oppose an assessment for trails. 4. The respondents were split nearly evenly regarding the city taking ownership of the outlots in Hidden Ponds 1st and 2nd Addition. Twenty-nine were in favor of city ownership. twenty-eight opposed. 5. The neighborhood was generally strongly opposed to the construction of sidewalks along South Shore Lane, Parkview Lane and Ticonderoga Trail in lieu of these trails. Eight (14%) supported the sidewalks. forty-nine opposed those sidewalks. Only two of the individuals whose lots would be affected by a sidewalk were in favor of sidewalks, while many of those lots that would be affected by sidewalks were "absolutely opposed" to sidewalks. 6. Twenty-four of those responding had their lots back up on the outlot, while thirty-five did not. Twenty-three of those whose lots backed up on the outlot would be willing to continue maintaining the adjacent outlot. Analysis of survey based on location of respondents: When reviewing the addresses of respondents that supported and opposed the trail system in Hidden Ponds 1st Addition, it becomes very apparent that the residents north of South Shore Lane believe the trail should be removed, while residents south of South Shore Lane believe the trail should be maintained if at all possible. Four of the five properties that backed up along the trail north of South Shore Lane opposed replacing the trail. The other property lot owner did not respond. While only two of the twenty-one lot owners backing up on the trail south of South Shore Lane opposed the trail. The following is a summary of the responses from Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition: 1. Ninety-two of the one hundred and eighty property owners in Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition responded to the survey. Fifty (54%) of the property owners supported replacing the trails. while forty-one opposed. 2 411 I(o • Hidden Ponds Trails January 8, 1993 2. Forty-nine (53%) of the property owners would agree to an assessment to replace the trails, while forty-one would oppose any assessment. 3. Sixty-eight (74%) of the property owners were in favor of the city taking ownership. while eighteen opposed city ownership of the outlots. 4. Nineteen (21%) property owners supported sidewalks along South Shore Lane. Parkview Lane or Ticonderoga. while sixty-six (72%) opposed sidewalks. 5. Sixteen of the respondents' lots backed up to the outlot and thirteen of those indicated they would agree to continue maintaining the outlot. Analysis of surveys based on location of respondents: When reviewing the location of those property owners that supported or opposed the trail in Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition, there are actually twenty-three property owners that have a trail running directly behind their lot. Of those twenty-three property owners eight property owners oppose replacing the trail, nine property owners were in favor of maintaining the trails six property owners did not respond. As the survey indicated, the majority (54%) of property • owners in 2nd Addition do want to keep the trails intact and the distribution of those supporting and opposing the trail is fairly well distributed. RECOMMENDATION - HIDDEN PONDS 1st ADDITION: Outlot A Trail: Due to the opposition of the residents north of South Shore Lane, the elevation of the land and the narrow strip of land (6' between the water and the back of the lots) in Outlot A, City staff would recommend that the trail north of South Shore Lane be removed and that area of Outlot A be re-seeded. Staff would recommend investigating the feasibility of realigning the trail along the west side of the pond, in order to make the connection to Duck Lake Trail. This may or may not be feasible based on the elevation of the land, type of soils and the width of the property between rear lot lines and the pond. If residents in the neighborhood strongly believe there is a need for a trail connection between Duck Lake Trail and the trail south of South Shore Lane, the city could also investigate the possibility of a sidewalk along South Shore Lane from Duck Lake Trail to Outlot B on the south side of South Shore Lane. At this time staff would not recommend any connection. Outlot B Trail: Staff would recommend inspecting the condition of the trail south of South Shore Lane to Valley S 3 /6l Hidden Ponds Trails January 8, 1993 • View Road to determine the best method for repairing the trail. Options include patching and seal coating, covering the existing trail with an asphalt overlay, or removing the trail and replacing it with recycled asphalt. Hidden Ponds Outlot A & B Ownership: After extensive research regarding the ongoing problems caused by the unclear ownership of Hidden Ponds Outlots A and B, it appears as though the defunct corporation of Ecklund and Swedlund still owns these two outlots. The members of that corporation include Len Swedlund, A. H. Michals, and Bruce Bren. It is the opinion of City staff that the only way alleviate these ongoing questions of title, liability for trail maintenance, etc. is for the City to acquire these outlots as part of the park and open space system. The City has three options or avenues to obtain title to Outlots A and B of Hidden Ponds 1st Addition. The first option recommended is to attempt to acquire a Quit Claim Deed from Swedlund, Bren and Michals. The second option, if option 1 is not feasible for some reason, is to condemn the property, and the final option is option is to complete the repairs to the walkway, due to their dangerous condition, assess the cost of the repairs to the outlot and allow it to go tax forfeit. If the City Council wishes to assess the cost of these trail improvements and repairs to the benefiting properties (all lots within Hidden Ponds 1st Addition), the Council must first obtain ownership of the outlots prior to proceeding with the improvements and the assessment process. • RECOMMENDATION - HIDDEN PONDS 2nd ADDITION: Outlot A Trail: City staff would recommend a close inspection of the entire trail within Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition in the Spring of 1993 to determine the best method to repair that trail. Again, the method may be either to patch and seal coat, place an asphalt overlay over the entire trail, or remove all or parts of the trail and replace as an asphalt trail or a soft surface trail of recycled asphalt. Hidden Ponds Second Addition Outlot A & B Ownership: Although Outlots A and B of Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition are clearly owned by the Homeowner's Association, that association ceased to operate approximately eight years ago, and according to property owners in the 2nd addition, it is unlikely to ever operate as a viable association. City staff believe that the most effective way to eliminate the questions and concerns regarding liability, trail maintenance, etc. in Hidden Ponds Outlot A, as well as any liability concerns property owners may have on Hidden Ponds Outlot B, is for the City to acquire the property as part of the park system. 4 • • Hidden Ponds Trails January 8, 1993 If the City Council is inclined to acquire this property for park and open space purposes there are three methods of acquisition for these outlots. The first method, which is the preferred method, is to contact the last known board members of the association and request that they attempt to get 66% of the property owners in Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition to sign a consent form authorizing transfer of ownership of these two outlots to the City for park and open space purposes. The second option would be to condemn the property. The third option would be to complete the improvements on the trails and assess the improvements to the outlots and allow them to go tax forfeit. The easiest and least costly method of acquisition would be simply to have two-thirds of the property owners agree to transfer title to the City. FUTURE MAINTENANCE Staff would not recommend the city begin any regular lawn or trail maintenance within these outlots until they are clearly city owned outlots. The city may wish to contract for mowing portions of the outlot for weed control where they are not maintained by adjacent property owners. The cost for weed control would be assessed to the outlots until they become City property. ASSESSMENT OPTION • The City Council may wish to consider assessing any trail improvements to the various subdivisions, as neither of these subdivisions paid park fees because of the understanding that they would maintain these outlots and trails. City staff would recommend that if the City Council chooses to assess these trail repairs to the outlots, that only the initial repairs be assessed and that the city would then consider these outlots and trails as part of the city park and trail system and would incorporate future maintenance under the general fund budget. BL:ds 11111 5 • I • MEMORANDUM TO: Hidden Ponds Homeowners FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: November 25, 1992 SUBJECT: Survey Regarding Hidden Ponds Trails The following survey will assist the members of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Council in deciding how the City can best help resolve the issue on the future of the trails in Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition. REQUEST FOR ADDRESS: We have requested that each resident fill in their address on this survey in order to determine the concerns of individuals in different parts of the two subdivisions. Hopefully, this information will help accommodate the wishes and desires of individuals in various parts of the two subdivisions. MAINTENACE ISSUES: When property owners adjacent to these side yard and rear yard paths maintain the lawn areas adjacent to these paths, the maintenance of the common area is similar to maintenance of the private lawns. If the expectation of property owners is for the City to mow the outlots, those outlots may not be mowed as often as people may wish. If the City does in fact take over the ownership, maintenance and liability of these outlots, it is unlikely the City would remove snow during the winter, as our existing policy is only to remove snow from major pedestrian routes and those trails that provide direct access to school bus loading areas or to the schools. SURVEY DEADLINE AND MEETING NOTICE: Please fill out this survey and mail it prior to December 4, 1992. the results of the survey will be tabulated and this issue will be brought before the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission again on Monday, January 4, 1993. This will be your only notice of that meeting., • • Hidden Ponds II - 92 HIDDEN PONDS TRAIL SURVEY 1. Please fill in the address of your lot 2. The City staff recommendation will be to remove the existing asphalt from the trails due to its dangerous condition. Are you in favor of replacing the trails? Yes ® No 3. The cost to replace those trails using recycled asphalt would be approximately $30,000. If this were assessed over a 10 year period, the cost per household would be about $19 for the first year, $17.50 for the second year, etc. Would you be willing to accept this assessment in order to replace the trails? ® Yes 11 No 4. Do you support the City taking ownership of the outlots in Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition? 41/ ® Yes © No 5. Would you support sidewalks along South Shore Lane, Park View Lane and Ticonderoga Trail in lieu of these trails? Yes No 6. Does your lot back up on the outlot ? El Yes ® No If you answered yes to question number 6, would you be willing to continue mowing the outlot adjacent to your lot? El Yes 0 No ...:.......:.. {{yf,,�,�,,ii ,::...:.iiY.:A::.i:::::::..::::::v:ii:•y}iii•.:�::::.::::::.::::iii:!!.}:hi4ii:{:.�.:�:.:::::::• `%3:?>::i -!:it ::::i:3:.::::.is i;i:::;:<:::•.:::;:::}:::::•..:;:ii::::::::::vi::::::::j:;:i:::::::j::::::::j::::::::j::j v::::i:::::`i:::::::::}'}: RNRb v .. ne ..Minn f6 S Hidden Ponds I - 59 HIDDEN PONDS TRAIL SURVEY 1. Please fill in the address of your lot 2. The City staff recommendation will be to remove the existing asphalt from the trails due to its dangerous condition. Are you in favor of replacing the trails? 0 Yes © No 3. The cost to replace those trails using recycled asphalt would be approximately $30,000. If this were assessed over a 10 year period, the cost per household would be about $19 for the first year, $17.50 for the second year, etc. Would you be willing to accept this assessment in order to replace the trails? © Yes El No 4. Do you support the City taking ownership of the outlots in Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition? © Yes ® No 5. Would you support sidewalks along South Shore Lane, Park View Lane and Ticonderoga Trail in lieu of these trails? ID Yes [3 No 6. Does your lot back up on the outlot ? © Yes ® No If you answered yes to question number 6, would you be willing to continue mowing the outlot adjacent to your lot? © Yes © No P ..................................... :>:>::;;::<:»:»>:>::<:>::>::>::>::::>::::>::;>::»::;:.;::.;:.;;:>:.::<.::::: ;;:.;:.::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.; v • • 01 / 14 /93 12 : 08 SUE FORESTER 6125447278 p . 001 UNAPPROVED MINUTES PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Monday, January 4, 1993 7 :30 p.m. , City Hall 7600 Executive Drive COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Richard, Chair; Bruce Bowman, Claire Hilgeman, Joanne Kube- Harderwijk, David Kracum, Diane Popovich Lynch, Del Vanderploeg COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Adam Harju, Thomas Marcus COMMITTEE STAFF: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks I. ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7 :35 p.m. by Chair, Pat Richard. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA . • Lambert added the following: NEW BUSINESS: Request from Hennepin Parks to consider deer control program for winter at Anderson Lakes Park. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Lynch noted one correction at last paragraph on page 3, incorrect spelling of Bowman. MOTION: Kube-Harderwijk moved to approve minutes with correction. Lynch seconded. Motion passed 7-0. IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Hidden Ponds Trails (con't from November 16, 1992 ) . Lambert indicated he had handed out information for review - November 25, and December 29, 1992, memorandums and Hidden Ponds Trail Survey results for Hidden Ponds I and Hidden Ponds II. He revie wed d an d summarized the resul ts of those surveys and presented staff recommendations. Vanderploeg asked if $30,000 was reasonable to replace and • repair the trails. Lambert responded that he thought it was reasonable, but may be off either way, as he had not 01 / 14 /93 12 : 08 SUE FORESTER 6125447273 p . 002 • completed any engineering estimates. Vanderploeg asked about the different compositions of trail surfaces due to the problems with water. Lambert indicated that asphalt would always be used on paths between homes. Richard asked for clarification of what recycled asphalt is. Lambert explained how recycled asphalt is created and said that it creates a surface that is harder and less expensive than ag lime and will not crack like asphalt does. Jim Sweezy from the First Addition indicated that he thought the Second Addition was more in favor of the plan. He said the homeowner's association hasn't worked and that if the City won't take care of the trails, the homeowners couldn't keep control of it. Hilgeman raised a question regarding South Shore Lane. Jim Sweezy indicated that with the plan, one of the houses on South Shore Lane would have a path on three sides of the house. He said he favored using gravel and moving the trails more toward the pond. Keri Miklag, 7054 Ticonderoga, asked who would have to pay for taxes and the legal expense and said she didn't think anything should be done until the legal aspects are settled. City Forester Stuart Fox answered questions regarding the tax. Jerry Thimsen of 7040 Parkview Lane, said a lawyer told him that if the $17 tax assessment for the trails • wasn't paid, the homeowner could lose his property. A resident commented that those who chose not to join the homeowner's association shouldn't have the right to vote on the matter. Maureen Brady, 18126 Valley View Road, who is not a member of the homeowner's association, feels she is subject to the covenants and rules the same as everyone else. Discussion continued regarding the covenants for Hidden Parks' homeowner's association and the legal ramifications of assessments to the property. Richard suggested bringing the discussion back to whether the trails are wanted and how. Bob Pauli, 7160 Parkview Lane, recommended that they proceed with the results of the survey. A resident at 7129 Ticonderoga Trail commented that if trails are torn out in one area, they might as well be torn out in all areas. Maureen Brady commented that if Outlot A goes, Outlot B should go also. Loren Fagen on Tartan Curve commented on the drainage problem. Lambert indicated that the drainage problem is a constant battle with the people in the neighborhoods. The 2 l t 01 / 14 /93 12 : 08 SUE FORESTER 6125447278 p . 003 City is trying to make adjustments to lower the ponds. The ponds should be lower, but people put boards in which keep the ponds at flood elevation. Then the City goes out and cleans out the boards when the pond floods. In response to a question on the width of the trails, Lambert indicated that, while the standard width of city trails is 8 feet, the current trails in Hidden Ponds are 6 feet and would be maintained at 6 feet. Responding to another comment regarding the condition of the trails, Lambert said some problems are caused by high water and some are the result of poor workmanship when the trails were first put in. Lambert indicated that the cost of asphalt trails would be more expensive than $30,000 and that the City won't be able to commit to maintaining the trails if people keep plugging up the ponds. The treasurer for Hidden Ponds Homeowner's Association said he thought the majority agree Eden Prairie has a nice trail system. He feels they need a place for kids to play and would like to see trails maintained. Regarding the outlots, he wants the City to take over liability and insurance for those trails.• Tom Tucker, 7178 Ticonderoga Trail, wondered how the City would let the taxes go delinquent. Lambert explained what happens when taxes go delinquent. Keri Miklag indicated she felt ag lime trails would be a mistake. Jack Erin, 7101 Ticonderoga, felt hard asphalt would be better. Richard indicated that at the first meeting on this topic, most felt the trails shouldn't be there; that they are too close to the homes. The survey shows the opposite sentiment. However, he feels at this meeting most people don't want the trails and his recommendation would be to tear up the trails and not waste any more time and money. Vanderploeg commented that the Staff has prepared things to do to the trails once there is a legal right to do something. Lambert indicated that the City has a right to go in right now due to the safety issue even though there are some obvious questions on legal matters. The City will ultimately have to review the matter and won't suggest a program if it has the chance of causing a tax problem for all lots. The legal issues will dictate whatever happens. • 3 r �� 01 / 14 /93 12 : 08 SUE FORESTER 6125447278 p . 004 Bowman asked what it would cost to just remove the unsafe • sections of the trails. Lambert estimated $5,000 or less. Bowman suggested doing what is necessary to make the trails safe, which would buy the City some time to pursue additional endeavors. Vanderploeg said he wouldn't support a Bandaid approach. Hilgeman indicated that the trail north of South Shore Lane has started to be torn up. Richard said he felt the trail should be taken out and not replaced. Hilgeman indicated that she's not confident that section spoils the entire trail and that the Staff's recommendation makes sense. A resident on Green Ridge Road in Hidden Parks Second Addition asked if Hidden Parks I is separate from the Hidden Parks II issue. Richard responded that the two separate issues are not Hidden Ponds I and Hidden Ponds II, but the section of trail between South Shore Lane and Duck Lake Trail is one issue and the rest of the trail is the second issue. Stuart Fox indicated that the City has a drainage utility easement on Outlots A and B and has a right to enter onto these lots for maintenance. MOTION: Hilgeman moved to recommend, subject to the City • Attorney's answers to various legal questions, the following: 1) in Outlot A, First Addition, that the trail north of South Shore Lane be removed and that area of Outlot A be reseeded; 2) in Outlot B, First Addition, that the trails be made safe and resurfaced where appropriate; 3) for the Second Addition, to repair trails where necessary per Staff recommendations of 12/29/92; 4 ) assessments would be made subject to the City Attorney's decision on legal matters; 5) Staff to determine the best surface to use, either asphalt or recycled asphalt, to maximize use of the trail. Motion was seconded by Kube-Harderwijk. Motion passed 7-0. 4 • !�� IV. PETITIONS , REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS • • A. Request from Hidden Ponds Homeowners to Subdivide Outlot A Hidden Ponds Refer to memo dated November 12, 1992, from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, newspaper article on the Hidden Ponds trail debate, ten resident letters to the City Council or Lambert, letter dated August 4, 1992 , from Roger Pauly, City Attorney to Lambert, letter dated October 9, 1992 , to Hidden Ponds Homeowners from Lambert, and newspaper article regarding use of lawn chemicals. Richard gave a review of the situation, requesting that discussion be limited to one hour, stating that, if need be, the commission would later revisit the Hidden Ponds issue. Lambert .. reviewed the staff reports on the proposal , asking that all understand that the discussion regarded private trails on private property, and that the City had gotten petition to subdivide the 1st Addition early this year from four property owners. He stated that the two main issues for discussion were: (1) Are we going to allow the trails to disappear or keep them, and ( 2) Are these trails safe? He stated that his recommendation would be removal of the asphalt and replacement, if replaced, with recycled asphalt or ag lime. He then referred to a map, pointing out the Hidden Pond I and Hidden Pond II Additions, land that was private land, city-owned land, trail systems and sidewalk. Lambert went over his staff report to the commission, saying that there were some other issues to be considered. For one, at least a portion of the trail in Hidden Pond Outlot A ran across a significant part of private property lots and that the water level was a -big concern in terms of safety. He pointed out that the soil in the outlets was of poor quality and therefore asphalt was a poor choice for use in trails, that recycled asphalt or ag lime would be better. He also pointed out that today staff wouldn't recommend the type of trail system that exists, today staff would probably recommend a sidewalk system instead. He asked if one question wasn't, should the sidewalk system be extended to Duck Lake Trail , and mentioned the Park View Lane, South Shore Lane and Valley View Road sidewalk additions . S Mom. yr UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 3 Lambert pointed out that the lot owners may not agree to be assessed, and asked if the City should consider paying for the assessment. He felt that most people already assume that the trails belong to the city, and felt one option would be to mark private property corners and allow people to walk on the turf within the outlots. Lambert also suggested that perhaps a survey shcuid be sent out to all 258 homes involved, asking that if the trail system was to be retained, would the homeowners be • willing to pay for them or if they would want a sidewalk system instead. Lambert clarified that at this meeting, staff was not going to try to prove who owned the outlots, and that the ownership was not clear, stating that 1976 memos showed cloudy ownership of property. He called on Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources, to share information on lot ownership in chronological order, and added that Roger Paul , City Attorney, would then add legal input. Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources , gave a brief synopsis in chronological order of what took place: • Hidden Ponds Subdivision was approved in December 1972 . • December of 1973 , Articles of Incorporation for a Hidden Ponds Homeowners Association were filed with the State of Minnesota. • April/May of 1975, Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition was approved. • September of 1975, letter from the City of Eden Prairie to Len Swedlund of Ecklund Swedlund, questioning the establishment of the Homeowners Association. • Also September of 1975, Len Swedlund applied to HUD for federally guaranteed assistance. • December of 1975, there was a reply from HUD requesting copies of the Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association. • February of 1976 , there was a letter from the City of Eden Prairie to HUD regarding formation of the Homeowners Association, saying it was filed in 1973 . • UNAPPROVED MINUTES • . EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 4 • Also in February of 1976 , . there was a letter from A. H. Michals, attorney for Ecklund Swedlund, requesting clarification on the organization of the Association. • March of 1976, there was a letter from the residents of the Hidden Pond 1st Addition to the City of Eden Prairie wanting again to discuss Association property. • May of 1976 , the City received deeds to several Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition outlots from Ecklund Swedlund. • June of 1976 , Restated Articles of Incorporation were filed, creating the Hidden Ponds Homeowners Association of Eden Prairie- (three word difference)- filed for the 2nd Addition and creating bylaws and covenants for the 2nd Addition. • November of 1976 , there was a letter from A. H. Michals, attorney for Ecklund Swedlund, stating that the neighbors of Hidden Ponds, because they were in limbo, should be included with the 2nd • Addition in the Homeowners Association. • July of 1977 ,. there was Certification of Title was registered giving Outlots A and B of Hidden Ponds to the Hidden Ponds Homeowners Association. Stu Fox summed it up by saying that in the mid 70's , there are questions about whether a Homeowners Association was filed for the Hidden Ponds 1st Addition, and that that document wasn't recorded on the deeds. The 2nd Addition was filed, as well as bylaws and covenants. Lambert said that a number of attorneys have looked at the situation and haven't been able to straighten it out, but that, though he may later regret it, he was willing to step in the middle of it and hopefully help finally resolve it. Roger Pauly, City Attorney, emphasized that he saw Torrens Certificate of Title for Outlots A and B on Hidden Ponds showing direct evidence of ownership of the lots and that they showed ownership by Hidden Ponds Homeowners Association, formed in 1973 . He said he had seen no evidence of the Association of Eden Prairie. He asked the assembly of homeowners if any of them were aware of the Hidden Pond 1st Addition Association or if • their titles referred to a Hidden Ponds 1st Addition. 117 . UNAPPROVED MINUTES• EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 5 One resident said that their title did, indeed, show covenants with a Homeowners Association of Eden Prairie; others said that their lots did not have covenants and the conclusion was that there seemed to be a 60/40 split among homes. One resident, asked if the City was going to pay for a title opinion. Richard, Chair, then asked residents to come to the podium to state their opinions. Jerry Thimsen of 7040 Park View Lane, said that he was one of the original four homeowners and that, as last resort, they had asked the City to subdivide Outlot A of Hidden Ponds. He said that he felt that Lambert had covered most areas of concern to him but pointed out that if bike paths/trails were put in Hidden Ponds Outlot A, in many cases the area between trail and water was less than 6' . He also said that invasion of privacy was . another concern, pointing out that there was only 28' from the trail to the back of one neighbor's home. Robert Cole of 7160 Park View Lane in the 1st Addition of Hidden Ponds , said that when some of the residents received Lambert's October 9th letter, they devised a survey, canvassing 67 of the 76 homeowners. The survey included three questions: (1) Are you for or against the Association? (2) What do you think should happen with the trails/paths? and ( 3) Where do you see the City of Eden Prairie fitting in with the trails? Cole said that opinions were diverse and it was hard to come to any conclusion. Of the 67 , 15 or 22% were for an Association with 28 or 19% against, and the remaining approx. 50% having no opinion. On the trail question, 73% of respondents were for retaining the trails , 16% against, with the balance having no opinion. On the City's involvement, 41% wanted the City of Eden Prairie to have ownership to the trails, with 59% having no opinion. Cole said that personally, he was for the trails , viewing them as an amenity, was for City ownership of the trails, and would be willing to pay a nominal share of the costs, though there might be extenuating circumstances. • • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 6 Richard asked Cole if he was surprised that 73% of the people wanted to retain the trails, and Cole said he was not. Richard also asked Cole if he felt that the City should do a survey and Cole answered yes. Gunnar Madson of 7115 Ticonderoga Trail said that he felt the trails were a nuisance, hazard, and involved loss of homeowner privacy. He said that if the trail was expanded, it would be only 15-20' away from his wall. He said that he found the traffic on the trails to be noisy and felt that the trails invited problems to the homeowners. Also, as for the Outlots , he said that if there was 3' of snow in winter and the trail was covered, people walked right through homeowner lots. Debbie Noterman of 7103 Park View Lane, said that although she wasn't an original owner, she had lived there for 12 years. Her feeling was that when they bought their home, the trail was there, as was the case 4110 for many of the other residents, and as such, the residents should not now be complaining about the existence of the trails. She said that she felt the City of Eden Prairie probably should pick up the tab for the costs but that she would be willing to pay part. She did point out, however, that 60% of trail use was by nonresidents . Richard asked if her home backed up to the trail and Noterman said that it did not. Stan Noterman, Debbie's husband, also of 7103 Park View Lane, pointed out that though he did not know if there was a normal standard for trails, this issue ' was particularly unique because the trails were in existence before the City began building trails. Luther Nelson of 7130 Park View Lane said that he was an _ original homeowner and had lived there for 18 years. He said that Outlot B, just north of Valley View, was owned by the Eden Prairie Homeowners Association and that on his certificate was Ecklund Swedlund's, now bankrupt, address. He said that he thought it was never followed through that homeowners go back later and add Homeowner Association membership on Titles, and it was probably a 0 legal question. He read from his certificate that there was to be no evaluation or taxes on the trails; that looking at the original plat approval , the trails were to 1 4 . UNAPPROVED MINUTES • • EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 7 be public; and that the Homeowners Association was to own the land and the City was to have an easement across the land for the trails but that no easement was listed on his certificate. Nelson said that personally he considered the trails an amenity but felt that the trails should be maintained by the City. He felt that the trails should be 8' wide but where curvy, 5' would be adequate. Nelson then asked who owned the ponds, pointing out that since both Outlots were part of the drainage system, if there was a problem with the drainage system, who was to be responsible. Lambert answered that the City did have drainage and utility easement on those lots and the the City also had the right to transfer over those outlets to service the ponds. Stu Fox commented that when property is designated as "common ground" , the taxation value is placed against the other properties within the subdivision. Bruce Andersen of 19200 Valley View Road said that he was one of the original owners but that his property was not on the trails. His concern was that if the trails became private, it would keep kids from the ponds. He also viewed the trails as an amenity, wanted the City of Eden Prairie to take over and revamp the trails, and wanted the City to do a survey of homeowners of both Hidden Pond 1st Addition and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition. John Peifer of 7020 Park View Lane said that he was one of the four homeowners who had requested subdivision of Outlot A Hidden Pond. He said that he had asked if there was a homeowners association and had been told no, that the original association went bankrupt. Peifer said that his concern was that in the spring he had seen the paths underwater for 3-4 days in a row and that, as a result, his lot got walked on by path users. He stated that it was his home that was only 28' away from the trails and that people sometimes walked as close as 15' to his home. He said that he wanted kids using the trails to be supervised and that he felt the trail was on his land. UNAPPROVED MINUTES • EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 8 Allyn Forsman of 18180 South Shore Lane West said that his back corner was 30' from the pond though is property was not on the trail . He said that he was concerned about the trails from a wetland aspect, that the ponds were home to geese, egrets, ducks and muskrat and that he wanted it protected. He pointed out that someone had thrown chunks of broken asphalt from the trail onto the ice and that upon thawing in spring, the asphalt would end up polluting the pond. He said he did not want any paths or trails but wanted the areas preserved as natural and wetlands. Forsman also felt that he was paying approximately $50 a month in taxation for his view of the ponds. He said he had bought his house from Ecklund Swedlund and that his title showed no covenants , just right of way with the neighbors (the Thimsens) for storm sewer. He also said that he wanted to challenge the neighborhood survey aforementioned, saying that he hadn't understood it when he answered it. • Terrie Thimsen of 7040 Park View, who bought their home in 1982, passed out photos showing flooded trails; her feeling was that the flooded trails were unsafe for her children. Thimsen also said that if the trail was owned by the City, it would be public and make her backyard also too public. She said that she felt that when they first moved there, the trails were used primarily by neighbors, but that at present the residents no longer knew the people using the trails , that they were strangers. Thimsen also brought up that the rehabilitation home being opened at Dell Road and Valley View included sex offenders and, as this was close to the trails , those residents might use the trails, in her opinion making the trails unsafe. Bob Pemberton of 18020 South Shore Lane West, who purchased his home in April of 1976 , said that he felt there had been a common interest in the trails . He said that he felt he was paying taxes on them, but failed to see where privacy was an issue as the trails were there first. He said that he himself wanted to keep the trails and would be willing to pay for their upkeep. Scott Harri of 19090 Deerfield Trail said that he was a • resident of the 2nd Addition, having bought his home in 1980. He said that he and his two children, aged 7 and UNAPPROVED MINUTES • EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 9 10, enjoyed the trails. He said he sympathized with the homeowners as to the degradation of the trails, and felt that the homeowners should be more proactive in maintaining the trails. He said that because the trails were there first, the trails were seen as public even if they actually were on private property. He then asked if the City had any right under "adverse possession" to take over the trails. Roger Paul , City Attorney, answered no, that because the land is Torrens property, the City could not get possession. Harri then said he would be willing personally to pay some assessment. He said that the City should try hard to extend the trail system but that he knew they had lost all referendums proposing that. Richard, Chair, interrupted by asking that the record shown that the City did have one success, passing one ill referendum extending the trails one year ago. Harri then said that regarding the flooding of the trails, perhaps there might be an engineering solution that would raise the trails. He added that narrowing the trails might answer part of the problem of proximity of homes to trails. He then asked if the City had any data on safety records re assaults, with or without trails. Lambert answered that in asking for police reports, data showed that there was no difference, whether there was sidewalk, trails, or nothing, as to number of crimes committed. Richard then thanked the assembly, encouraging all to stay for the rest of the meeting. He said that his recommendation would probably be for the City to get a survey done. He then invited discussion among the commission members. Vanderploeg said that he thought that the first priority would be to get ownership of the lots . Lambert said that if the trails were considered hazardous , the city could removed them without owning. He recommended assessing the cost of their removal . He UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 10 added that the best way to get ownership would be through tax forfeiture. Lambert said that a survey done by the City should include at least three questions: ( 1) Are you for or against the trails, (2) Would you be willing to pay an assessment, example, $15/year for x number of years? and (3) Which Addition are you a resident of? He said that each location needed to be looked at and standards today compared with before, saying that at present sidewalk or pedestrian walks are 5' wide. Discussion between Richard and Lambert as to the timetable of further commission discussion of the issue ensued. Lambert felt that the surveys would have to wait until after Thanksgiving, and that residents would be notified as to when the survey results would be discussed. At that time , he would make his recommendations. He said that the City Council probably • would not hear the issue until February. Richard asked for other questions or comments from the commissioners. Bowman asked about the legal situation since the outlets were owned by somebody, but trails shared. He asked if , since the trails were there for so long, there was something like squatters' rights that, uncontested for so long a period, the trails could go back to ownership by the Outlots. Pauly, City Attorney, pointed out that since the property was under the Torrens registered system nothing could be done under "adverse use. " Lambert pointed out that he could not imagine ever, by today's standard, recommending that a trail be on someone's private property. He said that he had a real concern, but that there must be some compromises since the trails couldn't be changed today to meet today's standard. Richard asked for other comments or a motion. • UNAPPROVED MINUTES • • EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 11 MOTION: Lynch moved that the Parks Commission recommend that staff prepare a survey to the property owners of Hidden Pond #1 and Hidden Pond #2 which designates the homeowners preference for or against the trails and that the survey clearly distinguish between those people who are located in Outlot A as well as Outlot B so that the results would be definitive enough for the Commission to make a decision based upon the results of that survey. Hilgeman seconded the motion. Discussion included a question by Kracum asking if clarification was needed since 60% of the trail users were nonresidents. Lambert answered no, that the trails would be used by anyone whether or not there was a gate put up for residents only and whether or not the trails were publicly or privately owned. The motion passed 7-0. Richard, again thanked the attending residents and • homeowners , pointing out that the Commission is appointed by the City Council , that the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council who then act for, or against their recommendations. He said that it sounded like their recommendation was going to be made to the City Council sometime in January/February, after survey results were in, and that residents would be notified of the meeting and at that meeting the Commission's recommendations to the Council would be discussed. He invited all to come and be involved, saying that he, himself, was surprised by the number of people who have this trail in back of their homes, yet wanted to keep the trail in place. B. Request from Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. for Reduced Hourly Ice Time Rate for "Summer Hockey Festival" Refer to memo dated November 10 , 1992 , from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks , Recreation and Natural Resources , and two letters dated September 6 , 1992 , and October 29 , 1992 , from John Wedemeyer, General Manager of Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. • ,4 • • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, REC. & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM. 11/16/92 12 Dave Black, Eden Prairie Community Center Operations Manager, introduced John Wedemeyer and Ed Williams of Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. and invited Wedemeyer to the podium. John Wedemeyer stated that Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. wants to use the Eden Prairie Community Center in the summer of 1993 to host two weeks of practice and games. He said that in 1991-92 , the games took place in Burnsville and Edina; in 1993 , he expected 70-80 teams to participate. He said that the organization was a nonprofit organization, with limited revenue, and thus required a discounted rate for ice time. Dave Black, Eden Prairie Community Center Operations Manager, stated the staff proposal. He said that the main question was, "What should summer ice cost?" He said that at best at present, they were only breaking even at meeting operating costs. • With the proposal of Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. , the buying of 150-200 ice hours would turn a break even situation into one of a profit of $7 ,000 .00 or more. Also, he pointed out that with a discounted summer ice policy and by hosting someone like Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. , this could be used as a selling point to others. Lambert said that the main issue was that the City of Eden Prairie hadn't discounted prices before for summer ice. He said that he had asked Black to do a survey comparing costs with other local arenas. He called attention to the last page of Black's analysis projecting 1993 summer ice revenue and said that it was important to both to be able to cover costs and be competitive with other arenas. Lambert asked for a policy, especially for the Eden Prairie resident's sake. At present, 90% of ice time is usually from Eden Prairie residents. MOTION: Richard made a motion to go with the staff recommendation and discount schedules of the November 10 , 1992 memo, adopting option #2 for a one-year trial period, with the condition that Commission get an update and that Dave Wedemeyer give a brief synopsis after the 1993 "Summer Hockey Festival" ; Wedemeyer agreed. Kube- Harderwijk seconded the motion and it passed 7-0. • I if MEMORANDUM • TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource/41-0' DATE: November 12, 1992 SUBJECT: Hidden Ponds Outlot A Subdivision Request and Hidden Ponds Bike Path BACKGROUND: Attached to this memo is some background and correspondence with individuals regarding the request to subdivide Outlot A of Hidden Ponds, and address the issue of removing or replacing the poorly maintained trails in outlots in Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition. As you know, I have sent out letters to 258 property owners in Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition inviting them to the November 16th meeting in order to provide a public forum for discussing the fate of the privately owned trail system in these two subdivisions. I must remind commission members that these are privately owned outlots and privately owned trails, and the only reason the City is involved is: 1. The four property owners that have obtained a quit claim deed from Lynn Swedlund have • requested the City to approve a subdivision of Outlot A, which would, in fact, eliminate a trail that was approved as a condition of the Hidden Ponds subdivision. 2. The Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources considers the condition of the trails in both Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition a public safety issue that has not been addressed for many years and believe the City Council should proceed with taking action to remove those trails unless the property owners in these two subdivisions agree to remove the trails or repair the trails. ISSUES: There are several issues of concern that will be raised by citizens at this meeting. The first issue will be the ownership of Outlot A of Hidden Ponds. Four property owners claim to have ownership via a quit claim deed from Lynn Swedlund, while other property owners claim that Lynn Swedlund does have total control of Outlot A and, therefore, the quit claim deed should not be recognized for the purpose of granting a subdivision. The City Attorney has advised City staff that City ordinance requires any individual or individuals petitioning for a subdivision to provide a title opinion indicating that all individuals with interest in the property have petitioned for the subdivision. The issue of ownership of this outlot will be determined by City Attorney review of a title opinion provided by the petitioners. 4111111 • • The second issue will be to determine the future of the trails within Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition outlots. I believe the commission will hear many arguments on both sides of the issue of whether or not to eliminate the trails completely, or to replace the trails. The commission can expect that the issues may be completely different between Hidden Ponds and Hidden Ponds 2nd Addition. Other issues to consider are as follows: 1. At least a portion of the trail within Outlot A of Hidden Ponds runs across a significant part of private property lots. It is questionable whether or not there is room to move the trail onto the outlot in this location as there is very little room between the rear lot line and the pond edge itself. 2. The soils in the majority of these outlots are very poor soils for trail construction. If the decision is to replace the existing trails, strong consideration should be made to replacing these trails with an aglime surface rather than asphalt, as asphalt will continue to crack during the freeze/thaw cycle each year. 3. The majority of the property owners supporting the trails are not the property owners that live adjacent to the trails. 4. If the Hidden Ponds subdivisions were being proposed today, the City staff would not recommend trails through backyards due to the invasion of privacy and extreme close proximity to rear lot lines. Staff would, in fact, be recommending sidewalks on one side • of the streets through these neighborhoods to provide for safe pedestrian movement. 5. Many of the property owners who support leaving the trail system in place are not willing to be assessed for removal and replacement of the trails. 6. If many of the users of the trail system are from beyond these neighborhoods (which is likely), these trails are, in fact, part of the overall City wide trail system and should be incorporated into the City wide trail system, either through a sidewalk system or through replacing these trails. 7. One option may be to eliminate the trails, but to mark private property corners with unobtrusive boundary markers; thus allowing neighbors within the subdivisions to continue to walk on the sodded areas of the outlots. RECOMMENDATION: City staff do not believe it will be possible to have all of the individuals attending this meeting come to a consensus at this time. Staff would recommend having the City send out a questionnaire to each of the 258 households requesting that they indicate whether or not they want the trails to remain in place or to be removed, and if they wish them to be remain in place if they are willing to accept an assessment for installation and maintenance. 11 2 Hidden Ponds Outlot A Subdivision Request November 12, 1992 Once the survey has been returned, City staff would forward the results of the survey to the commission at the December 21st meeting to determine what percent of the citizens want to retain the trails, perhaps what percent would prefer sidewalks, and who would be willing to pay for either. With this information, the commission could better make a recommendation to the City Council on what should be done to provide pedestrian and bicycle access through these neighborhoods. One final option might be to simply remove the existing trails, as they are a public safety hazard, and assess the trail removal cost to each of the outlots. Then it will be a matter of a decision on the part of the homeowners in each subdivision as to whether or not they want to form an active Homeowner's Association and collect dues to pay the assessment and to install and maintain a trail system as a part of their Homeowner's Association. If the assessments are not paid the property will go tax forfeit and could be acquired by the City of Eden Prairie for park purposes at which time it would then be the City's decision on whether or not to provide trails in those outlots. BL:mdd 41 ..hood' s fre lu v�e tk.. o k w¢..f lake. "I Wvva 4 sae. m2ii+d vi 066fa.4-..,.:� tr,,uw,�41.�.Y 1 t� e tl. 4 ^a°�c"° outlota/bob • 3 • /ICI gp . City of Eden Prairie EdEn Crlffices xecutive Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677•Telephone (612) 937-2262 October 9, 1992 SUBJECT: Hidden Ponds Trails Dear Hidden Ponds Homeowner: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will reconsider a recommendation to allow subdivision of Outlot A of Hidden Ponds 1st Addition at their November 16th meeting. The subdivision request is directly related to the issue of deciding on the future of the private trail system serving the Hidden Ponds neighborhood. You are invited to attend.the Commission meeting to provide neighborhood input regarding the need for the Hidden Ponds trail system. BACKGROUND: As you may or may not know, earlier this year four property owners in the Hidden Ponds First Addition requested the City of Eden Prairie either repair and maintain the path behind their home or agree to allow them to remove the trail. They were very concerned about the poor condition of the trail and the possibility that someone may be seriously injured on the trail. City staff informed those homeowners that the City did not own Outlot A and had no legal require- ments for maintaining the trail. Outlot A is owned by Ecklund and Swedlund, a company that went bankrupt approximately 15 years ago. In September the four property owners obtained a quit claim deed for the 35 feet of the outlot behind their four homes from Mr. Swedlund. Although the four property owners technically own the 35 additional feet behind their property within Outlot A, they are unable to subdivide that property without City approval, which would allow them to file the deeds with the County. The property owners have requested the City Council approve the subdivision of Outlot A, and the property owners have begun removing the trail on "their" property. As soon as the property owners put up barriers and began removing the trail, other property owners in the neighborhood called to complain to the City, and were upset to find that the City would allow removal of the path without a public notice to the adjacent property owners. City staff have delayed Council hearing of the subdivision request until area residents have an opportunity to voice their concerns. A number of years ago, residents in the Hidden Ponds Second Addition had also requested the City consider taking over the trails. At that time, the City Council decided not to take over those trails unless the Homeowner's Association agreed to upgrade the trails to City standards prior to the City accepting the trails. The residents in the second addition were unable to get • a majority of the residents in their subdivision to agree to pay for upgrading the trails. • Recycled Paper • Page 2 • At this time, it probably makes sense to review the status of all of the trails within Hidden Ponds First and Second Additions, as the City would anticipate other property owners may also petition to have trails behind their homes removed, while some people in the neighborhood may object to losing that trail system. City staff believe that the existing trail conditions are dangerous due to the large cracks and holes in the walkway and support removing or replacing the existing trail; but staff question the feasibility of maintaining an asphalt trail on the peat soils next to the pond. City staff believe there are several options to consider; however, the options may differ between the first and second addition because the outlot in the second addition is owned by the Homeowner's Association; whereas, the outlots in the first addition are owned by Ecklund and Swedlund. OPTIONS: The first option could be to allow the residents in Hidden Ponds First and Second Addition to remove the hard surface trail and simply leave the outlots in a "quasi public" condition. This would allow residents to walk in the outlot, but may cause problems if boundaries are not clearly marked, and if adjacent owners don't mow the grass in the outlot people would tend to walk in their yards. Furthermore, some people may choose to remove the trail, others may decide to let it remain in place. The second option would be for the City to remove the entire trail system, which would require • a "right of entry" on the property for that purpose. The third option would be to request the City to take over the entire trail system and to upgrade the trails either to aglime (soft surface) or an 8' asphalt trail similar to the other City trails. Replacing the entire trail system within Hidden Ponds First and Second with an 8' asphalt trail would cost approximately $50,000. If this were approved as an assessment project, the cost would be approximately $200 per household. If this were assessed over a ten year period, the increase in property taxes would be approximately $36 the first year, $34 the second year, etc. It would be very difficult to add that project to the capital improvement program paid out of the general fund, as the Council is seeking cuts from that program at this time. The cost to use either recycled asphalt or aglime would be closer to $30,000, with a cost of about $19 for the first year. This option would require that the City acquire ownership of the outlots. The fourth option would be to simply allow other residents in Hidden Ponds First to proceed with attempting to obtain a quit claim deed to extend their lots into the outlot and pay for removal of the trail themselves. While this is legally feasible in the First Addition, it would more difficult in the Second Addition simply because it is very difficult, if not impossible, for the Homeowners's Association to "sell the land." The only feasible option in Hidden Ponds Second Addition may be to have the City condemn the property from the Homeowner's Association, in order to take title to the property and proceed with either removing the trail or upgrading the trail. • /D • Page 3 • CONCERNS: The City is concerned about the liability of simply allowing these private trails to continue to deteriorate. There is potential for a serious fall by someone on a bicycle, or twisted ankle, etc. due to the large holes in the trail. The trail should either be removed or rebuilt and maintained. Some property owners have indicated a concern over the environmental impact of having a hard surface trail located adjacent to a protected wetland. City staff have reviewed the laws and have determined that existing trails can be installed or repaired, even though they may be adjacent to a protected wetland. PUBLIC MEETING: The City is inviting all residents from Hidden Ponds First and Second Addition to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting, which will be held at the Eden Prairie City Hall November 16, 1992, at 7:30 p.m. to obtain neighborhood input on what should be done with the Hidden Ponds trail system. That recommendation will then be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at their November 17th meeting, with a recommendation from City staff based on the input received at the November 16th meeting. Residents are also invited to the November 17th meeting at the City Council. Both meetings begin at 7:30 p.m. and are held in the Council Chambers at the City Hall. • City staff have heard from people on both sides of this issue; some strongly in favor of keeping PgY P g the trails in place and some strongly in favor of removing the trails. If you are unable to attend the November 16th meeting, but would like to provide your input, please feel free to write a letter that can be entered into the record. Many people have recognized that this is a serious issue that must eventually be resolved, as the trails become more deteriorated each year. I look forward to meeting with you on November 16th, and discussing a solution that will best serve the residents of the Hidden Ponds neighborhood. Sincerely, CITY OF ED ► ' • RIE 014"*" Robert A. Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources RAL:mdd hiddenp/bob City of Eden Prairie City Offices 7600 Executive Drive • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-3677 • Telephone (612) 937-2262 pram January 11, 1993 Gunnar M. Madsen 7115 Ticonderoga Trail Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55346 Dear Mr. Madsen: In response to your letter of January 10, 1993, I wish to inform you that as a matter of policy we do not send out unapproved minutes from meetings. The minutes of the January 4 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting will not be approved until the next meeting, which will be held February 1, 1993. In a telephone conversation today, you requested that I send you a copy of the results of the survey of Hidden Ponds I and Hidden Ponds II. A copy of those results is enclosed. In your telephone conversation today and your letter of January 10th, you make it very clear that you are strongly opposed to continued use of the segment of trail between your home and the Smith's. You stated that you and the Smith's should be the only ones that have the say on this segment of trail because you are most affected. All of the people in your neighborhood who use that trail to access the trail behind your home are also affected. As you indicate in your January 10th letter " it is a constant parade" of tricycles, wagons and families with children that are using that path. This leads me to believe that the path is needed by the neighborhood and that a survey on that particular segment would not be any different than the survey on the overall survey of the trail system in Hidden Ponds II. The purpose of the survey was to provide residents in Hidden Ponds to voice an opinion on the need for this trail system. These are private trails on private property and the City is merely trying to help resolve a neighborhood problem. Obviously, there are people on both sides of this issue and there is no way to satisfy everyone. It is my opinion that the majority of the property owners wish to keep the trail system in tact and, therefore, I am recommending the City Council do what it can to assist the neighborhood to that end. The only location where I am recommending the trails be removed is a short portion of the trail system in Hidden Ponds 1st Addition where a good portion of the trail is on private property and the remaining quasi public property does not have sufficient width to safely install a trail. • Recycled Paper ,/ • Gunnar M. Madsen January 11, 1993 Page 2 The City Council will be reviewing the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation on this issue at their January 19th meeting. You are certainly welcome to attend that meeting and voice your opinion of this issue. Sincerely, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Robert A. Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources RAL:mdd • • �Lv Gunnar M. Madsen • 7115 Ticonderoga Trail Eden Prairie, Mn. 55346 Tel. 0612-934-0032 Jan. 10, 1993 Mr. Bob Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear Mr. Lambert: Due to other commitments I missed the last meeting regarding Hidden Ponds Trail. I have requested minutes from that meeting but have not yet received them. It has however now come to my attention through newspaper reports and other sources that a recommendation to close certain parts while repairing and main- taining other parts of the trail will be recommended to the City Council on January 19th. Now to my point. The trail segment (a relative short one) coming from Ticonderoga Trail going between the Smith' s and our • own property is only 33 and 28 ft. respectively from our houses (bedroom sides) . Needless to say this gives us no or very little privacy. There is no respect for our property by and large of the users of this trail. The trail curves around the pond ana the bicycle and foot traffic always take the shortcut across our lawn creating a constant aggrevation the say the least. The noise, litter and traffic is quite heavy at times (haid . rubbez tires from tricycles, wagons, families with children) . It is .a constant parade. If any segment of the trail should be closed it is this one. We want you to strongly recommend this to the City Council at the Jan. 19th 1993 meeting. There would still be access to the trail from three other points. Sincerely, 7fr471$16 Gunnar M . Madsen Ed Smith Kari L. Madsen • Judy Smith 190 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ;4-c_ DATE: January 12, 1993 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Land Trust Request for Support and Participation In the attached December 21, 1992 letter, the Eden Prairie Land Trust is requesting the City Council's support in participating in the following: 1. fund raising efforts 2. public relations 3. outreach 4. legal assistance • The Land Trust reviewed this request with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their December 21st meeting. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommend support of the request as per the December 21st staff memo, which recommended supporting the Land Trust in these efforts as long as it is clear that the City is not taking a "lead role" in anyone of the four areas. There is a large difference between providing support and participation and providing the lead role in areas such as fund raising, public relations, outreach or legal assistance. Any contact with the City attorney would have to be through a City staff person. If the request for legal assistance was to be a lengthy project, it would have to be approved by the City Council. City staff concurs that in order for the Land Trust to be truly effective in its major goal, citizens as well the business community must be aware that the City is supportive of the Eden Prairie Land Trust and its goals to protect the natural resources of Eden Prairie. The Eden Prairie Land Trust has appeared before the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, the Planning Commission and the Heritage Preservation Commission requesting support as per their December 21st letter. All three commissions recommend that the City Council commit to supporting the Eden Prairie Land Trust in the area of their fund raising efforts, public relations, outreach and legal assistance. Any requests for expenditures in this support effort must be approved by the City Council. BL:mdd • land/bob i k w hi t: -\ A • t- ittArt. December 21, 1992 Eden Prairie Park,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Dear Commissioner: The Eden Prairie Land Trust was pleased to see the results of the 1992 Community Survey, which indicated strong support for not developing land that could be maintained for scenic and preservation purposes in the Riley Creek Valley,heavily wooded areas in the south- west of the city, and in the bluffs along the Minnesota River. The Eden Prairie Land Trust supports the Citizens Natural Resource Inventory Committee 0 process that will inventory natural areas and recommend the designation of areas to pre- serve,protect or purchase.We know that any public funding of these designated areas will require a community-wide support effort and would like the already organized and recog- nized Eden Prairie Land Trust to be the lead organization. Specifically,we are asking for the City's support and participation in the following: 1. Fundraising efforts.To raise funds from individuals and groups through donations, memberships and specialized campaigns, such as "Adopt a Tree;" to hire a professional fundraiser to develop a strategy; to monitor activities of the fundraiser; to identify and develop sources of metropolitan,state and federal government funds; and apply for grants. 2. Public relations. To access the local and metropolitan print,radio, and television media; to develop press releases and other public relations materials; to organize media events and educate both adults and children concerning the historic and ecological value of the natural areas. - 3. Outreach. To establish ongoing relationships with key federal,state and local officials; to identify, contact and secure support of advocacy organizations and seek their expertise in the areas of fundraising,legislative,legal,public relations, technical research and member- ship support. • Betty Z. McMahon Chair Phone/fax 612-934-9094 Page 2 Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission i 4. Legal.To assist in the development of legal conservation option; to identify existing options and to prepare legal documentation, as needed. We are requesting the City's public support of these joint efforts, staffing assistance and participation by city officials. Sincerely yours, Betty McMahon Chair,Eden Prairie Land Trust • • l G'? • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources — DATE: January 12, 1993 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Land Trust Request to Appoint Commission Members Their Board of Directors REQUEST: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a December 21st letter from Betty McMahon, Chair of the Eden Prairie Land Trust requesting the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to designate a representative to be on the Land Trust Board of Directors for a two year term. A similar letter was forwarded to the Planning Commission and the Heritage Preservation Commission. III CONSIDERATIONS: There was some discussion at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission as to why the staff believe the City Council needed to approve such appointment. Staff indicated that commission members are appointed by the City Council in the role of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission as defined by City Code. Any other responsibilities of the commission members as representative of the commission and the City of Eden Prairie would have to be approved by the City Council. There was additional discussion at the Planning Commission regarding the possible future conflicts of interest with a commission member reviewing a proposal on property that the Land Trust may wish to see preserved. The City attorney expressed some concern over Council appointment of commission members to serve on this board of directors as there may be some inference the Eden Prairie Land Trust is directly associated with the City and, therefore, the City may assume some liability from actions of this board of directors. The City attorney also noted that any commission member that serves on the Board of Directors of the Eden Prairie Land Trust would be unable to take part in the discussion or vote on any development proposal of land that the Eden Prairie Land Trust has designated as a priority for 40 acquisition or preservation. Eden Prairie Lane Trust Request • January 12, 1993 Page 2 OPTIONS: The City Council may decide to either allow commission members to serve on the board, but not in the capacity of representing the City commissions. If this is the Council wish, the City Council should not confirm any appointments of commission members to the board of directors. City Council may decide that it is in the best interests of the City to have commission members serve on the Eden Prairie Land Trust Board of Directors representing the City. In this case the City Council should approve these appointments. The following individuals have volunteered to serve on the Board of Directors representing these various commissions: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission: Claire Hilgeman Heritage Preservation Commission: Bonnie Peterson Planning Commission: The Panning Commission will designate a representative to serve as a board member when all 7 members of the commission are present and able to discuss this appointment. BL:mdd • boardmem/bob • • 1 ` J 410 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks , Recreation and Natural Resources FROM: John Gertz, Historical Interpreterl0i5 DATE: January 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Land Trust Requests On January 11th, two representatives of the Eden Prairie Land Trust met with the Heritage Preservation Commission to inform Commission Members about the Land Trust's recently adopted mission statement, to ask for support of its efforts, and seek a commission member to serve on the Land Trust's Board of Directors. 4111 It was acknowledged by those present at the meeting that a common mission exists for the Land Trust and Heritage Preservation Commission, i .e. , the preservation of resources indigenous, or unique to the City's physical and cultural landscapes. There was agreement that these resources often occur together, inextricably bound. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission agreed to support the efforts of the Eden Prairie Land Trust. Regarding the 9 9 request to have a member er of the Commission participate on the Eden Prairie Land Trust Board of Directors, the Commission nominated Bonnie Peterson. It was noted at the meeting by staff that this action would require City Council approval . 4111 vE 11P- _ . ,,,,:f,,, ,,., .:_,,,,i ; AviIiiik,{1 tki. IIIII ,.:<,._ tip: 3'-r December 21, 1992 Eden Prairie Parks,Recreation and natural Resources Commission 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie,Mn 55344 Dear Commissioners: The Eden Prairie Land Trust has obtained temporary nonprofit status under the Minne- sota River Valley Audubon Chapter (MRVAC).We are nearing completion of our application to the Internal Revenue Service to establish our own nonprofit tax status. Our mission statement is as follows: • The Eden Prairie Land Trust(EPLT)is a nonprofit land preservation organization committed to saving threatened natural areas within Eden Prairie that are of ecologic, scientific and historic value and to ensuring their preservation and protection for the enjoyment and education of future generations. The activities the EPLT include the following: 1. Purchase or accept donations of land or of conservation easements for land preserva- tion. Lands accepted would be of ecologic, scientific,agricultural, cultural, educational or historic value that would be preserved for the good of the public and future genera- tions. 2. Fundraising to secure private funding to purchase or assist in the purchase of threat- ened lands that meet the criteria expressed in (1). 3. Advise landowners on how to preserve their land,manage lands for conservation or help negotiate conservation transactions. Betty Z. McMahon • Chair,Eden Prairie Land Trust Phone/fax 612-934-9094 1cfl Page 2 Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission 11) 4. Work cooperatively with local government to research open space needs and priori- ties and develop conservbancy plans,regulations and ordinances. 5. Educate both adults and children concerning the historic and ecological value of the natural areas and promote conservation and preservation of these areas. 6. Work cooperatively with other nonprofit organizations concerned with education and the conservation of natural areas. The Eden Prairie Land Trust would like the Eden Prairie Parks,Recreation and Natu- ral Resources Commission to designate a representative to be on its Board of Direc- tors. The appointment would be for a period of two years. A copy of the draft bylaws is available. Sincerely yours, Betty McMahon • Chair,Eden Prairie Land Trust • • H c • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources -AL_ DATE: January 12, 1993 SUBJECT: Appointments to the Natural Resources Study Committee At the December 8th meeting, the City Council reviewed a proposed process for developing a Natural Resource Inventory and Evaluating Remaining Unique Natural Areas in Eden Prairie. The process called for evaluation of identified sites and participation of a citizens committee to develop criteria and rank priorities for acquisition or protection. The study process would take until early or mid-summer to complete. Lambert recommended that the study committee be made up of two representatives from the Planning Commission, two from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, two from the Heritage Preservation Commission, two from the Eden Prairie Land Trust, plus several residents. With the use of aerial photos, staff prepared an inventory of the remaining undeveloped unique natural areas in Eden Prairie focusing on Southwest Eden Prairie and the Minnesota River bluffs. Approximately 1000 acres of land was designated to be included in the study. Approximately 70 parcels were identified for review and included land around Rice Marsh Lake, the Mitchell Lake "Big Woods," the wooded land along Riley Creek and the land along the Minnesota River bluffs from Chanhassen to Bloomington. In the letter to the property owners, staff indicated that the propose of the report was to clarify the status of the property for commission members, councilmembers and property owners. Hopefully, this report will eliminate last minutes delays to study these types of issues when property owners decide to sell or develop any of their property in the future. City staff also asked each of the property owners if they wished to be considered for appointment as a member of the study committee. One property owner responded that he would like to be considered. His name and address is Peter K. George, 8741 Sandro Road, Bloomington, Minnesota. Other volunteers for this committee include the following: S • 119 Appointments to Natural Resources Committee January 12, 1993 • Page 2 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission representatives: 1. David Kracum 2. Bruce Bowman 3. Pat Richard (alternate) Planning Commission representatives: 1. Doug Sandstad 2. Mary Jane Weisner Heritage Preservation Commission representatives: 1. Art Weeks 2. Bonnie Peterson Eden Prairie Land Trust Representatives: 1. Howard Kaerwer 411 2. Scott Wallace Diane Lynch (alternate) Betty McMahon (alternate) Volunteers from the community that wish to be considered for appointment to this committee include the following: 1. Bob Hallett 2. Chuck Ruebling 3. Glen Olson 4. Vickie Koenig City staff would recommend Council appointment of all individuals that have volunteered to serve on this important committee. Staff will provide the Council with minutes of the committee meetings throughout the process. appoint/bob • avv MEMORANDUM • TO: Mayor and Councilmembers THROUGH: H. Martin Jessen, City Council Representative South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency FROM: Natalie Swaggert, Liaison South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency DATE: January 15, 1993 SUBJECT: Eden Prairie Recommendations To South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Members of the Human Rights and Services Commission in conjunction with the Human Services Committee have identified the following priority issues for inclusion in the 1993 - 1994 South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency (SHeRPA) Work Plan. 111111 • Access to medical care, health services, mental health services and legal aid services for low income, disabled, teens and other individuals; • Alternatives to serving the needs of children in crisis; • Affordable child care; • Success By Six/Head Start program. Action Required: Please review these recommendations. If you have additional priorities that you feel should be included please let me know. • 201 • MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH : Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources DATE: December 16, 1992 SUBJECT: Riley Lake Park BACKGROUND: In 1989, the City of Eden Prairie received a LAWCON grant for acquisition and development of Riley Lake Park. The acquisition was for the 24 acres eventually acquired from Elaine Jacques in 1991. The development was for expanding the swimming beach and moving the boat launch further away from the swimming beach to the north. The new boat launch moved to the north was to be a temporary location until the City acquired the four small parcels on the southern side of the park. At that time, the boat launch would be moved to the southern end 411 of the park, in order to move all of the boat launching traffic out of the middle of the active park area. As soon as the property was acquired in 1991, the City began realigning a portion of Riley Lake Road in order to accommodate moving the boat launch further to the north. This construction project was approximately 50% complete when the Halloween snow storm hit in the fall of 1991 and delayed finishing that project. In December of 1991, the City Council approved a park bond referendum for March 17, 1992, and decided that Riley Lake Park improvements should be included on this referendum. Staff depicted development of the park in two phases. The first phase developed only the existing land owned by the City, and would move the boat launch further north away from the beach. The second and final phase would occur once Riley Lake Road was realigned around the perimeter of the park and the four remaining parcels were acquired. During the design process for Riley Lake Park representatives from the Bearpath Subdivision proposed realigning Riley Lake Road, and making a land swap with the City that would expand the lake frontage of the Riley Lake Park, and also expand the net acreage in Riley Lake Park. As the City proceeded through the design process for Riley Lake Park, it became apparent that the realignment of Riley Lake Road, as well as the elevation of the road must be established before the City can proceed with final design specifications for this park. Furthermore, with the realignment of Riley Lake Road, it is apparent that the City should go to the final phase plan for Riley Lake Park that depicts the elimination of the road through the park and moving the vC 0e2 . boat launch to the southern boundary of the park. The interim design depicting the boat launch to the north of the beach causes heavy boat traffic through the middle of the park between the beach and the picnic areas, as well as between the beach and other shoreline activities such as fishing, etc. further to the north. RECOMMENDATION: The City staff recommend delaying the design and construction schedule for Riley Lake Park until the Bearpath development has confirmed a realignment of Riley Lake Road and has committed to the design for the road and the date the road will be opened. City staff assume that the realignment of Riley Lake Road will occur in late 1993 and, therefore, recommend delaying the construction of Riley Lake Park until the realigned Riley Lake Road is opened, which will allow the City to complete the final design of of the park. Furthermore, staff recommends that the City begin the negotiations for the acquisition of the four remaining parcels on the southern end of the park in order to relocate the boat launch in that location. City staff would recommend acquiring the parcels at the southern end of the lake with the use of cash park fees. Staff requests authorization to obtain appraisals on each of those sites at this time, if the intent is acquiring those parcels prior to the end of 1993, and beginning development of Riley Lake Park in the spring of 1994. Staff would intend to completely close the park during the construction of Riley Lake Park during the summer of 1994. RAL:mdd delay/7 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 5, 1993 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson,Jean Harris,H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITE14S OF BUSINESS IL MINUTES • A. City Council Meeting held Tuesday. December 8. 1992 Page 1 B. Special City Council Meeting held Wednesday. December 9. Page 10 1992 C. City Council Workshop held Thursday, December 10, 1992 Page 14 III. CONSENT CALENDAR Page 16 A. Clerk's License List B. Resolution Proclaiming January 17, 1993 as an Eden Prairie Page 18 Day to Commemorate Martin Luther King, Jr. C. Receive Petition for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Page 19 Improvements along Flying Cloud Drive south of CSAH 1 D. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Purgatory Creek Wetland Page 20 Restoration. I.C. 52-273 E. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Rowland Road. I.C. 52-067 Page 21 • F. Resolution Designating the Official City Newspaper Page 24 City Council Agenda Tuesday, January 5, 1993 Page Two G. Resolution Authorizing City Officials to Transact Banking Page 25 Business H. Resolution Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public . Page 26 Officials I. Resolution Designating Depositories Page 27 J. Resolution Authorizing the Treasurer to Invest City of Eden Page 28 Prairie Funds K. Resolution Regulating Fees and Charges for Business License Page 29. Permits and Municipal Services L. Resolution Authorizing the Treasurer or Deputy Treasurer to Page 53 Make Electronic Fund Transfers for City of Eden Prairie M. Set Tuesday. February 9. 1992. 6:00 PM. to Interview Candidates for Boards and Commissions IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 4) VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 1st Reading of Ordinance Amending the City Code Relating to Page 55 Delinquent Taxes in Connection wth..Granting Liquor Licenses VII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMI ES IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Resolution Designating the Official Meeting Dates. Time and Page 58 Place for the City of Eden Prairie Council in 1993 and Appointing an Acting Mayor B. Resolution Designating a Director and Alternate Director of the Page 59 Suburban Rate Authority for 1993 C. Southwest Metro Transit Commission Appointment of 1 A Councilmember to the Southwest Metro Transit Commission for a three-year term effective January 1993 City Council Agenda Tuesday, January 5, 1993 Page Three D. Appointment of Auditors for 1992 Calendar Year Page 60 E. Appointment of City Attorney for 1993 X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers B. Report of City Manager 1. Set Dates for Upcoming Council Workshops C. Report of Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resource D. Report of Director of Community Development E. Report of Director of Public Works F. Report of City Attorney G. Report of Finance Director • XI. OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT • UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1992 7:30 PM, CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Finance Director John D. Frane, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Robert Lambert, and Director of Public Works Gene Dietz PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added Item X.A.1.. Endorsement for Metropolitan Council Seat for District 13: and Item X.A.2.. Loose Gravel on Streets and Trails. Jessen added Item X.A.3.. Community Survey and Item X.A.4., Council Information/Study Request Progress Report; Tenpas added Item X.A.5., National League of Cities Conference. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the agenda as printed and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 17. 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the.minutes of the November 17, 1992, Council meeting with the following correction: The first sentence of Item X.A.1., should be amended to read, "Pidcock noted the letter she had sent to Councilmembers about the new consumer protection law regarding cable television, adding that Councilmembers, Staff, and residents should be informed about the new law." Motion carried unanimously. III. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Clerk's License List B. Approval of Lease Agreement for 7600 Executive Drive C. BORUCKI ADDITION by James and Pauline Borucki. Approval of Developer's Agreement for Borucki Addition. Location: 6517 Rowland Road. D. SUBURBAN CHEVROLET byMetropolitan Corporation. n - p 2 d Reading of Ordinance No. 44-92- PUD-9-92, PUD District Review on 16.2 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 16.2 acres; Adoption of Resolution No. 92-248, Authorizing Summary of an Ordinance City Council Minutes 2 December 8, 1992 and Ordering Publication of Said Summary; and Adoption of Resolution No. 92-249, Approving SO Plan for Suburban Chevrolet. Location: Southeast corner of Valley View Road and Plaza Drive. E. Resolution No. 92-250. Providing for Additional Letter of Credit Security on The Park at City West Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds F. Request from Team Minnesota Hockey, Inc. for Reduced Hourly Rate for Ice Time G. Policy on Pool Water Temperature at Community Center (Moved to Item X.C.3.) H. Resolution No. 92-251. Approving Final Plat Approval of RJH Addition (Walgreens Site) located at the S.W. Quadrant of Terrey Pine Drive and CSAH 4 I. Resolution No. 92-252. Approving Final Plat of Cascade Townhouses (located at the S.E. Quadrant of Dell Road and Cascade Drive) J. Resolution No. 92-253. Approving_Final Plat of Borucki Addition (located north of Rowland Road and east of Fallbrook Road K. Release of Land from Special Assessment Agreement between the City and Coffman Development (Country Glen) L. Approve Change Order No. 1 for Traffic Signals at Prairie Center Drive and Singletree La. (I.C. 52-245) M. Resolution No. 92-254. Supporting Light Rail Transit/Interim Regional Recreation Trail Corridor N. 1st Reading of Ordinance No. 45-92 Amending Peddlers. Transient Merchants and Solicitors Ordinance - Section 5.37 O. Change Order No. 4 for Eden Prairie Community Center Addition (Move to Item X.C.4.) MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve items A. -F. and H. - N. of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. CARMODY SUBDIVISION, by Thomas and Grace Carmody. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on .86 acres and Preliminary Plat of .86 acres into two lots. Location: 8595 Mitchell Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Enger reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal at its November 9th meeting by a unanimous vote. There were no comments from members of the audience. el City Council Minutes 3 December 8, 1992 411 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to: 1) Close the public hearing; 2) Approve the 1st reading of the ordinance for rezoning; 3) Adopt the Resolution approving the preliminary plat; and, 4) Direct Staff to prepare a Developer's Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. (NOTE: After the hearing was closed and the vote cast on this item, Council was asked to reopen the hearing to listen to the concerns of citizens who were not in attendance during the public hearing portion of the issue.) MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to reconsider motion approving the Carmody Subdivision. Motion carried on a 3-1-0 vote, with Pidcock voting against. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock to reopen the public hearing for the Carmody Subdivision. Motion carried unanimously. Brad Moe, 14372 West Ridge Drive, explained that the hearing notice stated that the hearing would be held at 8:00 p.m.; therefore, he and others were not in attendance at the time this item was acted upon by the Council. Moe presented a list of concerns about the proposed project, including density, drainage, lot size, home size, the work proposed on his property, and other construction, screening, and exterior materials issues which were addressed in a letter to the Council and on file in City Hall. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the public hearing to December 15, 1992, to allow all parties to be present during the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. B. RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, by Hustad Development for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.69 acres and Preliminary Plat of 26.26 acres into 19 lots and 1 outlot. Location: South of Riverview Road. (Ordinance for Rezoning and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Beth Simonstead, Hustad Development, explained the revisions to the plan compared to the plan for the same property submitted about a year ago. Enger reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval at its November 9th meeting. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended approval at its November 16th meeting, noting that the trail options and trail easements should continue to be explored before construction occurs. The Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission intended to hold additional meetings regarding the trail. Dietz added a report on drainage issues, recommending particular design features be incorporated into the project, including: the NURP pond be moved to a higher elevation, out of the flood plain with City Council Minutes 4 December 8, 1992 the outfall from the pond piped to the flood plain; the open channel flow be eliminated and the storr. water be piped to the pond using a 100-year design criteria; curb and gutter be added along the south side of Riverview Road approximately to the west boundary line of the Schlampp property; catch basins be added at the east end of the new curb and gutter and piping be constructed along the east property line of the development and connected to the ponding basin; the driveway be constructed with curb and gutter or with an inverted crown and catch basins added at its south end. Councilmembers recalled the problems caused by the 1987 Super Storm, which resulted in the house on an adjacent lot falling down the bluff, the break in the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) sanitary sewer interceptor, and the exposure of and spill from the Williams Bros. pipeline. Concerns were voiced regarding future breaks in either the interceptor or the pipeline and the responsibility for clean up, as well as what role, if any, the City would have in such an incident. Jullie reported that the MWCC had made an administrative determination that, environmentally, there was no longer a cause for concern about the break in the interceptor pipe. Regarding Williams Bros. Pipeline, it was reported that spot checks had been made for contamination in the area. Bob Brown, owner of the property, said that grass was beginning to grow and trees were sprouting, which were signs of recovery. Clean up necessitated by any future pipeline break would continue to be the responsibility of the Williams Bros. Pipeline company. Councilmembers discussed several concerns regarding the 30 ft.-wide strip of land owned by the City which was located along the east boundary of the property, including: use of the strip for access Williams Bros. Pipeline to their pipe, both on a regular and emergency basis; the type of ownersh the City had over the land; if the land was developed with a driveway to allow for a private access from the easterly-most lot within the plat and used by Williams Bros., whether the Williams Bros. vehicles would destroy the driveway; the need to preserve access to the Minnesota River area for the City; and the potential for a trail within the 30 ft. wide strip. Councilmembers discussed the need for a different bonding procedure to protect from a catastrophic problem, noting that because of soil conditions and storm water run-off issues, this property was particularly susceptible to such conditions as was shown in 1987. Pauly advised that City Code provisions allowed for bonding for land alteration in a form and amount as would be determined by the Council. A risk analysis, including modeling, was suggested by Council, in order to determine necessary protective measures for this type of parcel. Dick Brown, 7685 Heritage Road, Scott Haines, 10449 Huntington Drive, Lauren and Kevin Bluml, 10549 West Riverview Drive, and Gayle Diehl, 10530 West Riverview Drive, explained their concerns regarding the development proposal, including: clarification of responsibilities in the event individual drainage plans for each lot did not work; safety of the pedestrian trail; a long-term plans for trail access to the Minnesota River; desire for the trail to stay in the location planned; and how to obtain compliance from the MWCC for completion of the landscape plan in the area damaged in 1987. Councilmembers stated that the meetings would be held by the Parks, Recreation, and Natur Resources Commission regarding the trail location, noting that it was the City's intention to ac any other dedicated park land for the sole purpose of turning it over to the U. S. Fish and Wildli Service for park purposes along the Minnesota River. Council directed Staff to follow-up on the completion of the landscape plan agreed to by the MWCC. q City Council Minutes 5 December 8, 1992 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the item pending further study regarding the following issues: 1) Greater detail on storm water drainage on the property for the individual lots and for the general area as described by the Director of Public Works, including that all storm sewer be designed for a minimum of a 100-year storm event; 2) More detailed information on the 30-ft. wide strip of land with respect to the type of City ownership over the strip, alternate access available to the MWCC for access to its pipe as well as how much damage their trucks might cause to the road bed; access needed for the most easterly lot of the proposed subdivision over the strip of land; potential for a trail over the strip of land; and, 3) Recommended methods for bonding of the grading and land alteration for the property due to its soil conditions and environmental sensitivity, with recommendations for design of erosion control procedures to prevent washouts and different grading procedures for the development, including staged construction and other special needs. Councilmembers discussed the motion in detail, acknowledging that they would be setting a precedent for a standard of treatment for such sensitive parcels in the future. Motion failed on a vote of 2-2-0, with Jessen and Tenpas voting against. Mayor Tenpas declared a recess at 9:45 p.m.; the meeting was reconvened at 10:00 p.m. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to reconsider the motion to close the public hearing on Riverview Heights. Motion carried unanimously. The Council discussed continuing the public hearing to January, 1993. Simonstead said that the owners and developers would agree to a postponement at this time pending resolution of the three items discussed. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue the public hearing for Riverview Heights to January 19, 1993, pending resolution of the issues raised at this meeting. Motion carried unanimously. V. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to approve the Payment of Claims as presented. PP Y Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Anderson, Jessen, Pidcock, and Tenpas voting "aye." City Council Minutes 6 December 8, 1992 • VI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 2nd Reading of Ordinance Amending Peddlers Transient Merchants and Solicitors Ordinance- Section 5.37 and Resolution Authorizing Summary for Publication MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Anderson, to continue this item to the December 15, 1992, meeting. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from Daniel Dehnerico to be Granted a Peddlers License in the City of Eden Prairie Jullie reported that the Police Department Staff had discovered information which they believed to be grounds for not approving the license request of Mr. Delmerico. Daniel Delmerico refuted some of the information in the report. Council directed Staff to work with Mr. Delmerico toward resolution of the issues and to return to the next meeting with any new findings. VIII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES IX. APPOINTMENTS A. Appointment of Student/Youth Member to the Parks. Recreation and Natural Resources Commission MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to appoint Tom Marcus as a Student/Youth Member to the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. Motion carried unanimously. X. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. Reports of Councilmembers 1. Endorsement for Metropolitan Council Seat for District 13 MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt Resolution No. 92-254, endorsing Ed Schlampp for appointment to the Metropolitan Council Seat for District 13. Motion carried on a 3-1-0 vote with Tenpas voting against. 2. Loose Gravel on Streets and Trails Pidcock reported that she had received a letter from a young man names Jordan Coleman regardin injuries sustained by his sister from sliding on loose gravel. She added that she had received oth complaints as well. Councilmembers discussed the loose gravel complaints on streets and trai and directed Staff to follow up and report back to the Council about controlling the problems. City Council Minutes 7 December 8, 1992 • 3. Community Survey Jessen made note of the report of the preliminary results of the recent Community Survey and recommended a Council Study Session on the results when they were finalized. 4. Council Information/Study Request Progress Report Regarding the report, Jessen said he believed it was a useful tool for keeping track of the status of various items and asked that it be updated and provided to Councilmembers on a monthly basis. He suggested several additions, including: the MWCC landscape plan discussed during the Riverview Heights proposal and recommendations from the auditor. Other Councilmembers concurred that regular review was important. 5. National League of Cities Conference Tenpas reported on the National League of Cities conference held in New Orleans. He said he was impressed with the individual workshops, including "right-sizing" of government, the role of government in education, gangs in suburban areas, and, in general, found the conference to be enlightening. Pidcock concurred that the workshops were informative and insightful. She had attended a 110 workshop on creating downtown open spaces, which was particularly helpful with respect to Eden Prairie's own plans for its downtown. Pidcock noted that the speaker recommended looking at 15- 20 proposals before making a choice, not the usual 5-6 proposals. Both agreed that the conference served as an excellent resource, and that it had provided a renewed focus and purpose for them as City Council members. B. Report of City Manager C. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation & Natural Resource 1. Policy on Pool Water Temperature at Community Center (Moved to Item X.C.3.) Regarding chlorine problems in the pool, Lambert reported that the water in the pool was tested by the City, the county and the University of Minnesota. Results showed that the air circulation in the pool was not as good as it could be in that chlorine was being inhaled by some of the swimmers because it tended to stay at the surface of the water. Correction would cost $80,000. Lambert said staff would investigate further and report back to the Council with potential options for mitigation. Lambert noted that the major complaint was regarding water temperature. Competitive swimmers wanted cooler water, recreational swimmers wanted warmer water. He said the temperature of the water did not affect the amount of bacteria in the water. Council authorized Lambert to develop and administer a policy on the temperature of the water based on his research and expertise. City Council Minutes 8 December 8, 1992 2. Change Order No. 4 for Eden Prairie Community Center Addition (Move to Item X.C.4.). Council discussed the overall status of the project. MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve Change Order#4 for the Community Center. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Proposal from Mrs. H. R. Fowler. 13015 Riverview Road Mrs. H. R. Fowler, 13015 Riverview Road, presented a proposal for the City to acquire her property consisting of several buildings on 20 acres. Both the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission recommended that the City Council reject the proposal in its present form. The Cultural Commission listed some preliminary findings and had questions about the compatibility of the property to meet objectives of the City. Councilmembers concurred that the property was an important one to the community and although the current proposal may not be acceptable, they wanted to keep the lines of communication open to continue negotiations with her. Jessen and Pidcock volunteered to work with Mrs. Fowler. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Jessen, to extend the meeting to 11:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Process for Natural Resource Inventory Per Council direction, staff had begun review of ways to inventory the natural resources in the southwestern part of Eden Prairie and the Minnesota River Bluffs. Lambert reviewed a process which had been successful in Maplewood and had adapted it to Eden Prairie's needs. The process called for evaluation of the sites and participation of a residents committee to develop evaluation criteria and rank priorities for acquisition or protection. This study process would take until early Summer to complete. Councilmembers had questions regarding whether recommendations for development would be one of the results of the study; whether the watershed district would be part of the committee; how the sites would be graded, or ranked; whether a review of City ordinances and policies would also be part of the process; and how citizens would be chosen for the committee. Lambert said that there would be recommendations for development from the committee for each parcel. He noted that he had contacted the watershed district, but had not yet received a response as to their participation in the process. Lambert explained that the sites would be graded, or ranked, in a manner similar to the way the Big Woods north of Mitchell Lake was graded, based on flora and fauna quality. He agreed that the review of the ordinances and policies was an important and integr part of the entire process and that it would be part of the committee and Staff responsibilities review these documents thoroughly. City Council Minutes 9 December 8, 1992 • Lambert said that the members, other than representatives from various City commissions, would be citizens who had volunteered for such activities. He said he would try to follow the suggestion made that non-advocates be encouraged to be part of the citizen committee. Lambert asked that the citizen representatives be appointed in January, 1993, to aid in expediting the process. Councilmembers directed that City Staff, including the City Attorney, and perhaps the watershed district, plan workshops soon to begin work on the process. MOTION: Anderson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the process and authorize preparation of a Request for Proposal for inventory of the City's natural resources as proposed by Staff. Motion carried unanimously. XI. OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Jessen, to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Tenpas adjourned the meeting at 11:45 p.m. • • 0 t • UNAPPROVED MINUTES SPECIAL EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9 , 1992 7 : 30 PM, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER, 7600 Executive Drive COUNCILMEMBERS : Mayor Douglas Tenpas , Richard Anderson, Jean Harris , H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, Finance Director John Frane, Director of Assessing Steve Sinell , Accountant Sara Ruth and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL - Councilmember Harris was absent due to illness . I . 1993 FINAL TAX LEVY AND GENERAL FUND BUDGET HEARING Mayor Tenpas said Staff would present a review of the proposed budget highlights and then the meeting would be opened to the audience for comments or questions . City Manager Jullie noted that several written comments had been received and that those comments would be attached to the Minutes of this meeting. Jullie then presented several overheads that summarized the 1993 proposed budget and the status of the local economy. He said the proposed net tax levy for 1993 is an increase of $150 ,000 , or 1 . 24% over 1992 . He said, because of the state legislature' s transition to new formulas , there is a shift in the tax burden from commercial/industrial and higher-value homesteads to low- and moderate-priced residences . He also noted that there have been significant reductions in values of commercial/industrial properties due to a weakened real estate market . At the request of Mayor Tenpas , Jullie and Director of Assessing Sinell explained the previous state tax structure and how that changed. Eric ( refused to give last name and address) noted that his taxes are going up 25% but wages aren' t going up at all , and he . wanted to know where the money for the increase will come from. Tenpas said that , because the City has been growing, the requirements for services has increased but the City has been /0 City Council Meeting 2 December 9 , 1992 able to hold down the budget increases to a minimum. Pidcock noted that the City receives less than one-fifth of the total tax revenue. Bill Dobbins , 17433 Evener Way, said salaries are going down but his taxes have increased up to 50% in the two years he has lived here. He said the fastest growing industry in Minnesota is government and people are dissatisfied with that . Tenpas said the City has tried to deal with the problem of how to plan for long-range capital improvements required to accommodate expansion while keeping taxes from increasing proportionally. Pidcock said it was important that taxpayers keep talking to state legislators who make the formulas that affect cities . Jessen said he thought it was important for everyone to understand that the total spending for the City is down in 1993; however, because of a loss in other revenue sources , we have to collect a little more on the tax base in order to maintain services . Greg Olson, 7373 Ann Court , asked about the state's revision in the three-tier policy and if that would change again. Tenpas said, while there are no more changes that we know of , the state will raise taxes if there is a revenue shortfall . Jessen said that last year a revenue shortfall caused the state to charge cities a sales tax, something that has never occurred4111 before. Lee Kottke , 14674 Staring Lake Parkway, said that his assessed value went up 60% and he was very frustrated by this . He said he will have to sell either part or all of his property, neither of which he wants to do . He said he wanted to object to the use of realtors rather than elected officials on the Board of Review this year . Pidcock said development in a neighborhood often causes problems for people who have lived there for a long time and who are on fixed incomes . Dick Brown, 7685 Heritage Road, said he wanted to compliment the Council for doing a good job. He said he gets more for his tax dollar here than he did in the four other states in which he lived. He asked if some of the costs for the last park bond referendum are included in the City' s budget for this year. Jullie said there are some costs included. John Jacobsen, 7146 Emerald Lane, said he has been a resident since the spring of 1991 and asked if there is a set frequency for revaluation of property. Pidcock said it is every four years by state law. Jacobsen said he had seen real estate flyers for houses in his neighborhood that were comparable to his home but with taxes $800-$1000 less . Tenpas suggested that Mr. Jacobsen make an appointment with the Assessing Department to discuss his valuation . /I City Council Meeting 3 December 9 , 1992 Ted Begron, no address stated, said he is protesting his taxes and that , as a salesman, he knows about working harder for less money. He said he would like to see what spending cuts in Eden Prairie would do. Tenpas said we have, in fact , decreased spending because we aren' t keeping pace with the growth that has occurred in the City. Bob Gorski , 8958 Knollwood Drive, said he thought we need to establish an atmosphere of capping expenditures . He said he also thought that a concrete sidewalk would have been adequate at the Community Center rather than the expensive brick paving that was done there. He said he also thought it is important to communicate what is happening in the City. Tenpas noted that the Council meetings will be televised on cable TV when the City offices are moved to the C. P .T. building. Kevin Johnson, no address stated, said he would like the date of printing put on the tax statements . Tenpas said we could make that recommendation to the county . Robert Michaelson, 11742 Mt . Curve Road, asked for a clarification of the reservation of fund balances decrease for 1993 . Tenpas said we had in effect created a savings account to provide for future capital improvements last year and we are not adding to it this year. Michaelson asked what the decrease in transportation improvements was . Finance Director Frane said the 1992 amount included the City' s share of improvements for Hwy. 5 . Mike Hodges , 12575 Crowfoot Court , said he was protesting his tax increase, especially because of the long term effect such increases might have on the sale of homes in Eden Prairie. Shari Nornes, 13550 Essex Court , asked about the process used to set the budget . Tenpas said the City department heads formulate their budgets based on policies and standards , then the City Manager reviews the figures and brings a recommendation to the Council . He said we made a decision to hold the line this year, so several cuts were made to the original budget recommendations . Jessen said we look through the operations and functions of each of the departments to determine the right level of services based on such things as the community attitude surveys . Nornes said she would prefer to have Eden Prairie be a leader in quality improvements while holding down costs rather than just being comparable to other cities . Tenpas said that his goal is to have Eden Prairie be the best managed and best planned suburb and to have all the major capital expenditures taken care of by the time the City is fully developed. Nornes asked if we have process improvements in place to reduce our overall administrative costs . Jullie explained some of the efforts in total quality management , including staff training City Council Meeting 4 December 9, 1992 and quality teams , and described some of the positive results S that have come about from those efforts . Nornes asked what the average merit budget is for this year. Swaggert said the union contract is 2 . 5% and it is 3% for non- union employees . Gene Heier, 9816 Crestwood Terrace, asked if there is a better way to let people know what their tax increases would be before they have to vote on a referendum. Pidcock said she thought we did the best estimate we could with the information available at the time of the park bond referendum. Heier said he thought it should be possible to project these things before they occur. Tenpas said he thought we can improve on our communication regarding any future referendum but we sometimes have trouble getting feed back from the community. LeRoy Heitz , 9281 E. Staring Lane, said he thought the City should concentrate on public safety, health and welfare and forget about such things as recreation and liquor stores that actually compete against private enterprise. He said he strongly supported term limitations . II . ESTABLISH DATE TO RECONVENE HEARING ( IF NECESSARY) A reconvene was not necessary. 5 III . ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION CERTIFYING 1993 TAX LEV LEW AND APPROVING GENERAL FUND BUDGET MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No . 92-255 , Certifying the 1992 Tax Levy, Collectible in 1993 , and Adopting the 1993 General Fund Budget . Motion carried 4-0 . IV. ADJOURNMENT • MOTION: Jessen moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adjourn the meeting at 9 : 30 PM. Motion carried 4-0 . • f3 MINUTES • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AIRPORT WORKSHOP SESSION THURSDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1992 7:30 PM CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBER 7600 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Douglas Tenpas, Richard Anderson, Jean Harris, H. Martin Jessen, and Patricia Pidcock CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant to the City Manager Craig Dawson, City Attorney Roger Pauly, Director of Community Development Chris Enger, Planner Scott Kipp, and Planner Jean Johnson ROLL CALL: All members present except Councilmember Harris. Also present were three members of the Zero Expansion at Flying Cloud group. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as submitted. II. CITY STAFF/CITY ATTORNEY UPDATES • A. Metropolitan Council systems Committee Review of MAC Long-Term Comprehensive Master Plan Kipp reviewed and summarized the December 2, 1992 Metropolitan Council staff report prepared for the Systems Committee meeting of December 8. There were several issues and interpretations with which the City would disagree. Enger believed that the staff presentation at the Systems Committee meeting more forcefully stated reasons to support the proposed expansion. The staff claimed: 1) Air traffic levels at Flying Cloud were beyond the airport's capacity 2) Improvements for instrument operations were needed as IFR operations are available only at MSP, Holman Field (St. Paul) , Airlake, and Flying Cloud 3) Land use compatibility - there was no joint airport zoning board, and the City's comprehensive plan did not conform with requirements for the airport Tenpas stressed that Metropolitan Councilmembers need perspectives and information in addition to its staff's. Anderson cautioned that the Met Council believed southwest communities complained too much about hosting regional facilities. He noted that Met Council now stated one reason for expansion was to handle larger aircraft diverted from MSP; the MAC has never admitted this motive. Airport Workshop Session Minutes December 10, 1992 Page two 1111 B. Latest Information RE: Airport Issues and Review Process Pauly discussed several important legal issues related to the case. State legislation adopted in 1977, 1980, and 1983 would preclude the MAC and Met Council from proceeding on this proposal. A State Supreme Court case from 1982 involving the City of Faribault determined that airport zoning is a taking of property requiring compensation; neither the Met Council nor the MAC has indicated they would accept this liability. He commented further on what he believed were the strongest points in the City's position. Pauly believed the City needed to show early that it was serious in its opposition to the expansion, but not against the presence of the airport. III. DISCUSSION OF STRATEGY AND RESOURCES There was general discussion about the types of assistance the City would need in its case. The Council agreed that financial commitments at this time should be limited, and allow time for information needs and strategy to develop. Councilmembers assented to an action plan made by Jessen: 1) Councilmembers would contact Met Council members by December 15� and other persons as appropriate • - Staff and City Attorney would prepare brief information points 2) Be prepared to interview technical consultants by January 19 More information will need to be developed about air traffic trends than construction and flight requirements initially 3) Hire public information assistance soon 4) Contemplate retention of a legislative lobbyist by early February Anderson requested staff to report on strategy development at the December 15 Council meeting. Tenpas agreed with a member of the Zero Expansion group that we need to dispel NIMBY perceptions, and stress that we like our airport. IV. OTHER BUSINESS None. V. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9: 14 p.m. CWD:bmm 0 - CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST January 5, 1993 CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM. ) GAS FITTER Carson Pirie Scott Affordable Heating & Air Conditioning Cirks Construction Air Corporation, Inc. Diversified Construction DelMar Furnace Exchange, Inc. The Fendler Company Economy Gas Installers, Inc. G. L. Contracting, Inc. Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning Heco Construction Northern Air Corp. KMSP-TV Owens Services Corp. • Karkela Construction Penn Plumbing Kraus-Anderson Construction Michael J. Peterson Plumbing Northern Sun Builders Richfield Plumbing Co. Opus Corporation Southside Heating & Air Conditioning Prairie Entertainment Assoc. Standard Heating & Air Conditioning Sears Roebuck & Company Superior Contractors, Inc. Space Construction Thermex Corporation Larry Vensel Const. Yale, Inc. Watson-Forsberg Company • PLUMBING HEATING & VENTILATING Affordable Heating & Air Conditioning Crosstown Plumbing, Inc. Air Corporation, Inc. Franke Plumbing DelMar Furnace Exchange, Inc. Joyce Plumbing, Inc. General Sheet Metal Corp. Neu Plumbing Judkins Heating & Air Conditioning Penn Plumbing Kleve Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Michael J. Peterson Plumbing North Country Aire Richfield Plumbing Co. O'Brien Sheet Metal , Inc. Solberg Plumbing Owens Services Corp. Voson Plumbing, Inc. R & S Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Ries Heating & Sheet Metal SEPTIC SYSTEMS Southside Heating & Air Conditioning South-Town Refrigeration, Inc. Tom Hennes & Sons Standard Heating & Air Conditioning Sullivan 's Utility Services Surperior Contractors, Inc. Thermex Corporation SCAVENGER Tin Man, Inc. Yale, Inc. Sullivan' s Utility Services COMMERCIAL KENNEL MECHANICAL GAMES Kingdale Kennels American Amusement Arcades FOOD VEHICLE PUBLIC DANCE • Half Time Restaurant Snack Attack. Delivery Service, Inc. /LP 1111 CLERK' S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST page two TYPE A FOOD CIGARETTE Driskill 's Super Valu American Amusement Arcades Lunds, Inc. Brooks Superette # 51 Rainbow Foods Driskill ' s Super Valu Rainbow Foods Shinders Book Store TYPE B FOOD Target Store Wal-Mart Store • Shinders Book Store Target Store Wal-Mart Store 3.2 BEER OFF SALE Brooks Superette # 51 TYPE C FOOD Brooks Superette # 51 PDQ Food Store Tom Thumb Stores #269 & 275 4111 These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Pat Solie Licensing • Proclamation 1111 RESOLUTION NO. Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration "A Sharing of Our Ethnic Diversity" January 17, 1993 WHEREAS: The City of Eden Prairie and the Eden Prairie School District join in recognizing Martin Luther King, Jr. with a celebration to be held on Sun- day, January 17, 1993; and WHEREAS: Eden Prairie recognizes that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. had a dream and dedicated his life to helping freedom exist for all people; and WHEREAS: the designation of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day serves as a reminder of his dream, his commitment to human rights, and his nonviolent philosophy; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eden Prairie hereby pro- . claims January 17, 1993, as a day to commemorate Martin Luther King, Jr and asks all residents to continue their commitment and concern for equal rights for all persons, to dedicate themselves to helping those who do not yet share in that freedom, and to join in the celebration planned by the Human Rights and Services Commission to commemorate Dr. King's dream. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: 40 John D. Frane, City Clerk /? CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY REPORT WHEREAS, a petition has been received and it is proposed to make the following improvements: I.C. 52-204, (Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements on Flying Cloud Drive South of CSAH #1) and assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements, pursuant to M.S.A. 429.011 to 429.111. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: That the proposed improvements be referred to the City Engineer for study with the assistance of R.C.M. and that a feasibility report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the scope, cost assessment and feasibility of the proposed improvements. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on January 5, 1993. • Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor SEAL ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 0) CHANGE ORDER #1 • Date: December 23, 1992 City Improvement Contract #: 52-273 Project Name: Purgatory Creek Wetland Restoration Contractor: Widmer, Inc. Engineer: City of Eden Prairie Nature of Changes: 1. Additional grading necessary to fulfill requirements of EPA work order. Grading completed after the contractor had moved off site originally requiring contract to move back on site. Adjustment to Contract Price: 1. Add labor, equipment charges, mobilization $ 4,342.00 Summary of Contract Changes: Contract Amount Prior to Change Order #1: $ 45,767.00 Net Increase Resulting from Change Order #1: $ 4,342.00 Current Contract Amount Including Change Order #1: $ 50,109.00 THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE APPROVED: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • By Date THE ABOVE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTED: WIDMER, INC. By • Date 20 Dsk:Est.Pay:52-273.001 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 November 25, 1992 • PROJECT: Rowland Road and Old Shady Oak Road Improvements City Project No. 52-067 S.A.P. 181-118-01 RCM Project No. 841026.05 TO: S.M. Hentges & Sons Construction Co. You are hereby directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract. NATURE OF CHANGE TO CONTRACT 1. ADD items 1-17 and Delete items 26-42 storm sewer pipe and appurtenances as listed below and as shown on the enclosed Drawings. 2. Items 18 and 19 are added due to a revision in the street pavement section'caused by a higher moisture content of the subgrade soils than what was anticipated. 3. Item 20 was added to save 3 significant trees. 4. Items 21 and 22 were added due to relocation of the sanitary sewer jacking pit to maintain continual access into the adjacent office park. 5. Item 23 was added and Item 42 was deleted due to uncertainty of the type development that will occur on the Ruzik Property and whether a 4-inch or 6-inch sewer service would be required. 6. Items 24 and 25 were added per City requirement to provide larger water services to the 2 lots located between Station 34+00 and Station 36+00. Due to the distance the homes are from the watermain, 1'k - inch water services are necessary to maintain adequate water pressure to the homes. 7. Item 26 was added and Items 43, 44, and 45 were deducted to improve erosion control on the steep slopes. 8. Items 27 and 28 was added and Item 46 was deducted due to change in subgrade condition of the road caused by the wet and cool weather encounter during construction. ADJUSTMENTS TO CONTRACT QUANTITIES AND COSTS ADD the following quantities and costs to the contract: For 1 above: 1 12" RC Pipe Apron w/ Trash Guard 1 EA @ $275.00 $275.00 2 18" RC Pipe Apron w/Trash Guard 2 EA @ $550.00 1100.00 3 24" RC Pipe Apron w/ Trash Guard 1 EA @ $750.00 750.00 4 30" RC Pipe Apron w/ Trash Guard 1 EA @ $950.00 950.00 5 12" RC Pipe Sewer CL V • 597 LF @ $ $15.00 8,955.00 1 n 6 15" RC Pipe Sewer CL V 190 LF @ $ $16.50 3,135.00 0 • 7 18" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 116 LF @$18.20 2,111.20 8 24" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 38 LF @$24.00 912.00 • 9 30" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 18 LF @ $37.00 666.00 10 Random Riprap, CL III 225.6 CY @ $35.00 7,896.00 11 24" Corrugated Smooth Wall PVC Pipe 580 LF @ $25.00 14,500.00 12 Construct Manhole, Design S-1 5 EA @$1,100.00 5,500.00 13 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-5, 4' Diameter 3 EA @ $900.00 2,700.00 14 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-6 4 EA @ $650.00 2,600.00 15 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-7 4 EA @ $2,300.00 9,200.00 16 Unclassified Excavation (P) 7200 CY @$2.25 16,200.00 17 18" RCP Construction Joint 1 EA @ $500.00 500.00 18 Aggregate Base, CL 5 (100% Crushed • Quarry Rock) 5,066 TON @ $6.73 34,094.18 19 Geotextile Fabric 4,380 TON @ $1.20 5,256.00 20 Diamond Block Retaining Wall 730 SF @ $13.00 9,490.00 21 Replace 12 Bushes and 2 Ash Trees w/Edging and Wood Chips at East Side of Shady Oak Road Sewer Crossing 1 LS @ $1,269.12 1,269.12 22 Replace Sprinkler System at East Side of • Shady Oak Road Sewer Crossing 1 LS @ $1,540.00 1,540.00 23 Cut in 8"x 6" Wyes at Ruzik Property 4 EA @ $500.00 2,000.00 24 1 1/4" Copper Service 46 LF @ $15.00 690.00 25 1 1/4" Service Connection (incl. saddle, corp., curb stop box installation) 2 EA @ $200.00 400.00 26 Wood Fiber Blanket 10,000 SY @ $1.20 12,000.00 27 Class 5 Aggregate 8,250 TONS @ $6.73 55,522.50 28 Geotextile Fabric 4,380 SY @$1.20 5.256.00 TOTAL ADDITION $205.468.00 DEDUCT the following quantities and costs to the contract: For 1 above: 26 15" RC Pipe Apron 2 EA @ $300.00 $600.00 27 36" RC Pipe Apron w/ Trash Guard 1 EA @ $1,150.00 1,150.00 28 12" RC Pipe Sewer CL V 390 LF @ $15.00 5,850.00 29 15" RC Pipe Sewer CL V 584 LF @ $16.50 9,636.00 30 21" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 248 LF @ $21.50 5,332.00 0 31 21" RC Pipe Sewer CL IV ' 472 LF @ $21.50 10,148.00 2 / . 32 24" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 109 LF @ $24.00 2,616.00 • 33 27" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 313 LF @ $30.00 9,390.00 34 36" RC Pipe Sewer CL III 20 LF @ $46.00 920.00 • 35 Random Riprap, CL III 20 CY @ $35.00 700.00 36 Construct Manhole, Design S-1, 4' Diameter 4 EA @ $1,100.00 4,400.00 37 Construct Manhole, Design S-1, 5' Diameter 1 EA @$1,400.00 1,400.00 38 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-5, 4' Diameter 6 EA @ $900.00 5,400.00 39 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-5, 5' Diameter 3 EA @ $1,300.00 3,900.00 40 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-6 3 EA @ $650.00 1,950.00 1 41 Construct Catchbasin, Design S-7 2 EA @ $2,300.00 4,600.00 42 8" x 4" Wye 4 EA @ $125.00 500.00 r 43 Disc Anchoring 1.92 ACRES @$55.00 105.60 44 Mulch 3.84 TONS @$150.00 576.00 45 Polypropylene Plastic Netting 10,000 SY @ $0.50 5,000.00 46 Modified Common Borrow 29,427 TONS @ $2.75 80.924.25 TOTAL DEDUCT $155.097.85 Contract Amount $1,197,809.80 • Increase Resulting from This Change Order $50.370.15 Total Contract Value Including This Change Order $1.248.179.95 The Above Changes are Approved: 1 i RCM S CI T S, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By A mip By Date The Above Changes are Accepted: S.M.. HENTGES ON C NSTRUCTION CO. Da a (-t._ 3 1111 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL CITY NEWSPAPER BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota that the Eden Prairie News be designated as the official City newspaper for the year 1993. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of January, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: • SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY OFFICIALS TO TRANSACT BANKING BUSINESS BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Eden Prairie, be and they hereby are, authorized to act for the City in the transaction of any banking business with the official depositories (hereinafter referred to as the banks), such authority including authority on behalf of or in the name of the City from time to time and until written notice to the bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said account, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. The bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any check against such account which is signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable 4110 to the order of. or deposited to the credit of. any officer or officers of the City including the signer or signers of the check. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Acting Mayor be authorized to sign checks as an alternate for the Mayor, the Deputy Treasurer be authorized to sign checks as an alternate for the treasurer. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of January 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane. City Clerk • 411 '�5 4111 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS BE IT RESOLVED, that the use of facsimile signatures by the following persons: Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor and John D. Frane, Treasurer or Carl J. Jullie, City Manager on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers or other orders on public funds deposited hereby is approved, and that each of said named persons may authorize the depository bank to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn, as fully 411/ as though it bore his manually written signature, and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall be affixed without his authority. ADOPTED by the City Council on this 5th day of January 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor • ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES BE IT RESOLVED, that the First Bank Eden Prairie of Eden Prairie, Norwest Bank of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and the First State Bank of Eden Praire, Minnesota, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, Minnesota. The City Treasurer shall maintain adequate collateral for funds in the depository. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of January, 1993. • 4111 Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • 410 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93- • A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER TO INVEST CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED. by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, that the City Treasurer is authorized to invest City of Eden Prairie funds with any bank, or other financial institution authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota in Certificates of Deposit, U.S. Government Notes and Bills, obligations of the state of Minnesota or any of its subdivisions, Federal Government Agency Bonds and Notes, Savings Accounts and Repurchase Agreements and any other security authorized by law. The City Treasurer shall maintain adequate collateral for funds deposited. ADOPTED by the City Council on this 5th day of January, 1993. s Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk DATE: JANUARY 5, 1993 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOHN FRANE SUBJECT: 1993 FEE RESOLUTION All proposed changes in our Fee Resolution are summarized as follows: 2.22 EXCAVATION OF STREETS (Section 6.07) Annual fee was $10.00 and the new fee is $12.00. 2.3 SIGNS (Section 11.70) Old Fee New Fee Up to 33 sq ft in size $12.00 $40.00 33 sq ft - 60 sq ft in size $15.00 $50.00 61 sq ft - 100 sq ft in size $18.00 $60.00 411/ Each additional 100 sq ft or portion thereof not exceeding 300 sq ft additional per year $ 2.00 $ 4.00 Each additional 100 sq ft or portion thereof not over a total of 400 sq ft additional $ 2.50 $ 5.00 2.34 Development Fees Added development deposit agreement for Planned Unit Developments, Planned Unit Development amendments, rezoning, platting, site plan review, guide plan changes and environmental assessment worksheets. The deposit amount is based on acreage. 2.39 SYSTEM ACCESS CHARGES Sanitary sewer was $300 per R.E.C. plus $130 $600 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office - plus $130 $900 each Metro SAC for commercial - plus $130 The new fees are $325 per R.E.C. plus $135 $650 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office - plus $135 $975 each Metro SAC for commercial - plus $135 Water was $565 per R.E.C. $1130 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office $1695 each Metro SAC for commercial. The new fees are $590 per R.E.C. $1180 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office $1770 each Metro SAC for commercial. The following are all new fees added to the resolution. 2.42 FIRE HYDRANT USE/METER FOR CONSTRUCTION AND IRRIGATION 4111 A. Permit fee $25.00 B. Fire hydrant damage deposit $200 (applied to the final water bill) C. 3" meter deposit $400 (refundable) D. All other meter deposits $100 (refundable) 2.43 WATER FLOW TEST FOR 5/8" METERS $25 When consumption is challenged by a customer & the meter is accurate 2.44 WATER SERVICE TURN ON/OFF $25 After the initial turn on, any non- emergency on/off request by a commerical lending institution, government agency (HUD), or private property management service 2.45 NEW CONSTRUCTION COLIFORM BACTERIA RESAMPLING T&M Based on actual laboratory costs, employee time, and utility truck rental rates. The costs are above and beyond the initial sampling costs and is directed at projects that have multiple failures. 2.46 NEW CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL REINSPECTIONS 4111 T&M Directed at projects that require multiple visits to complete initial inspection. Same criteria as coliform resampling. 3.31 CHARGES FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT VACATION FEE The application fee per each transaction was $100.00 and is now $200.00. 3.5 ZONING AMENEMENT AND ZONING APPEAL (Appealing to Building Code Board of Appeals)Residents: Residential was $75.00 and is now $125.00. All other variances requests were $125.00 and are now $300.00. Plus a $150.00 development deposit agreement is required. 3.8 COMMUNITY CENTER A. Ice Arena prime time rental was $95.00/hr and is now $100.00/hr for the standard size rink and $105.00/hr for the olympic size rink. Ice Arena non prime time rental was $47.50/hr between 3 a.m. and 2 p.m. on days when school was in session. The new rates are $50.00/hr for the standard size rink and $52.50/hr for the olympic size rink. The non pr. time hours have been changed to 6 a.m. and 2 p.m. School District Education Classes, School District Hockey Team practice, Hockey Association of Eden Prairie, Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club, School District 272, MN North Star Hockey Club, Men's Hockey League and other Community Groups are charged the same rates as above. Summer ice time rental rates (May 15 - September 15) have been added. Hockey games were $95.00/hr and are now $100.00/hr. Special ice time for School District 272 Physical Educational Classes scheduled September - May 7:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. was $23.75/hr and is now $25.00/hr. D. Fitness Center individual use fee was $2.00 and is now $2.50. E. Meeting Rooms added $10.00/hr for olympic ice arena. H. Daily use fees for the fitness center was $2.00 per day and is now $2.50. M. Outdoor Center & Homeward Hills Park Shelter Rental Fees: Our policy no longer requires a staff supervisor to be on duty at all times when the Center is in use. 3.9 PARK FACILITY FEES has been changed to read the following: Reservations are limited to Eden Prairie residents. Eden Prairie residents S that work in a firm or attend a church outside the City limits may reserve the facility for their company picnic, church picnics, etc. Ball field fees was $25.00 per field per day. The resolution now reads: Ballfield reservations are limited to Eden Prairie non-profit public service groups for weekend tournaments at no charge. Groups will be provided with hand drags, rakes and liners with a $100.00 deposit. The fields will be dragged at the start of each day; however, if the group requests the City to drag the fields after each game, the cost will be $25.00 per field per day for that service. 3.16 USE OF CITY SOUND SYSTEM has been added to the resolution: A. Security deposit $100.00 B. City,personnel transport to location, set up $ 40.00 and take down C. Operation of sound system by city staff $ 20.00/hr D. Self contained sound system $ 50.00/day 4111 2t CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA4111 RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION REGULATING FEES AND CHARGES FOR BUSINESS LICENSES PERMITS AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie resolves as follows: INDEX SECTION 1 FEES, CHARGES AND RATES AUTHORIZED AND DEFINED SECTION 2 FEES, RATES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 3 OTHER FEES, RATES AND CHARGES SECTION 1. FEES, CHARGES AND RATES AUTHORIZED AND DEFINED The fees, charges and rates imposed for the purposes set forth in this Resolution for licenses, permits and municipal services shall, after adoption hereof, be in the amounts set forth in the following sections. SECTION 2. . FEES, RATES AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO CITY CODE 411/ The following fees, rates and charges required to be fixed and determined by Resolution of the City Council pursuant to the City Code and for other licenses, permits and municipal services are hereby fixed, determined and adopted as hereinafter set forth. Business Licenses: 2.1 CIGARETTES (Section 5.35) Annual $ 12.00 2.2 CONTRACTORS (Section 5.33) Annual One & two family $ 15.00 Multi-family & commercial $ 25.00 2.3 DANCE HALLS (Section 5.31 & 5.32) Annual Public Shows or Dances $400.00 if live musicians are employed. $100.00 where music is provided exclusively by electrical or mechanical devices(s). • Incidental Shows or Dances $300.00 if live musicians are employed. $ 50.00 where music is provided exclusively by electrical or mechanical device(s). 1111 e--1 �.fi a $ 25.00 when live musicians are employed and when the applicant is a religious, charitable or other non-profit 1110 organization and the permit is for a special event or limited period; when music is to be provided exclusively by electrical or mechanical means for such non-profit organization, the fee shall be $10.00. No fee is required for dances conducted by the Park and Recreation Department, any agency of the Eden Prairie School District, or the Eden Prairie Foundation. 2.4 DOGS (Section 9.07) License: Male Annual $4.00 Female Annual $4.00 License fee is proratable by quarters. Impounding fees: $ 25.00 - 1st offense/year $ 50.00 - 2nd offense/year $100.00 - 3rd offense/year Boarding fee: $ 8.00 per day Euthanasia fee: $ 15.00 2.5 DOG KENNELS (Section 5.60) Annual Commercial $ 50.00 4111 Private $ 25.00* *Includes three individual dog licenses and tags. An additional $4.00 for each dog over three dogs. 2.6 DRIVE-IN THEATERS (Section 5.31) Annual $300.00 Theaters Annual $200.00 2.7 FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS (Section 5.38) A. Restaurants, stores, supermarkets, manufacturing and processing plants, etc. $225.00 Supplementary areas: bar, kitchen, meat market, bakery, grocery store, other. each $ 15.00 B. Bottled soft drinks and packaged products sold in prepackaged form each $ 40.00 supplementary area $ 10.00 C. Other food establishments not in "A" each $175.00 supplementary area Itinerant food establishment first day $ 50.00 each additional day $ 10.00 1111 Temporary food license $ 35.00 Retail candy shop - when operated in connection with another licensed food establishment $ 10.00 1111 Retail candy outlet $ 55.00 Readily perishable food vehicle including bakery food vehicle additional $ 30.00 Vending machines for food or beverage each $ 15.00 Catering food vehicle $100.00 2.8 GAMBLING (see Ordinance No. 44-89) Annual Fee $ 0.00 Temporary Fee $ 0.00 2.9 GAS FITTERS Annual Class A $ 15.00 2.10 GRAVEL MINING (Section 11.55) Application Annual Performance fee license bond Land alteration incidental mining (0 to 25,000 c.y. ) 4111 total plan volume $ 200.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,000.00 Borrow pit, with 25,000 - 75,000 c.y. annual plan volume $ 2,000.00 $ 300.00 $10,000.00 Borrow pit, with more than 75,000 c.y. annual volume $ 2,500.00 $750.00 $10,000.00 2.11 HEATING & VENTILATING Annual $ 15.00 2.12 LIQUOR (Chapter 4) Non-intoxicating malt liquors Annual Application fee $100.00 On-Sale $ 50.00 Off-Sale $ 10.00 Liquor On-sale Annual $ 7500.00 Investigation fee $ 500.00* Liquor On-sale - fraternal Clubs - Annual $ 100.00 Investigation fee $ 500.00* non-fraternal Clubs - Annual - 50% of annual on-sale fee 4110 Investigation fee $ 500.00* Liquor On-sale - wine Annual $ 2000.00 4111 Application fee $ 250.00 Sunday Liquor Annual $ 200.00 Employee License Annual $ 10.00 *An investigation fee not to exceed $500 shall be charged an applicant by the City if the investigation is conducted within the State, or the actual cost not to exceed $10,000 if the investigation is required outside the State, shall be charged an applicant by the City. 2.13 MECHANICAL AMUSEMENT DEVICES & AMUSEMENT CENTERS (Section 5.30) For each of the first three machines/devices ("A") $ 25.00 Juke boxes, kids rides, etc. per machine ("B" & "C") $ 25.00 2.14 PEDDLERS (Section 5.37) Annual-evidence of State License $ 5.00 2.15 PLUMBING LICENSES No fee - State Bond/Insurance required 2.16 PUBLIC SERVICES Refuse & garbage collectors (Section 5.36) Annual 1st vehicle $ 30.00 Each additional vehicle $ 15.00 4111 Scavengers (Section 5.34) Annual $ 10.00 2.17 WATER SOFTENING & FILTERING No fee - State License required 2.18 WELLS No fee - State License required 2.19 BUILDING PERMITS (Section 10.06) Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to $500.00 $15.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $15.00 first $500.00 plus $2.00 each additional $100.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $45.00 first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 each additional $1,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $252.00 first $25,000.00 plus $6.50 each additional $1,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $414.50 first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 $4.50 each additional $1,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $639.50 first $100,000.00 plus $3.50 4110 each additional $1,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2039.50 first $500,000.00 plus $3.00 each additional $1,000.00 4111 $1,000,001.00 & up $3539.50 first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 each additional $1,000.00 PLAN CHECKING FEES: Plan checking fee shall be 65% of the building permit fee. 2.20 DEMOLISHING OR RAZING BUILDINGS (Section 10.05) $ 25.00 2.21 EXCAVATION & GRADING (Chapter 70, U.B.C. 1986 & City Engineer's approval) Plan Checking Fees Fee 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $22.50 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $30.00 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $30.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $15.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction therof. 100.001 to 200,000 cubic yards $165.00 for the first 100,000 cubic 4111 yards, plus $9.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 200,001 cubic yards or more $255.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards, plus $4.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Other Inspections and Fees Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approve plans: (minimum charge = one half hour) - $30.00 per hour. Grading Permit Fees 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $22.50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic 4111 yards plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 100,001 or more $562.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Other Inspections and Fees Inspections outside of normal business hours $30.00 per hour* (minimum charge = 2 hours) Reinspection fee assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) $30.00 each Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated (minimum charge = one-half hour) $30.00 per hour*. Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions to approved plans (minimum charge - one-half hour) $30.00 per hour* *or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and 411/ fringe benefits of the employees involved. 2.22 EXCAVATION OF STREETS (Section6.07) $ 12.00 2.23 FIRE PREVENTION PERMITS (Section 9.05) Storage & handling of flammable liquids $ 25.00 Storage & handling of corrosive liquids $ 25.00 Dry cleaning establishments $ 25.00 Hazardous chemicals $ 25.00 Resurfacing & refinishing $ 25.00 Installation of LP tanks $ 25.00 • Installation of flammable & combustible liquid tanks $ 25.00 per tank Tents $ 25.00 Grease vapor removal system cleaning (per cleaning) $ 45.00 Fireworks $ 25.00+ (+ = standby firefighters at persent hourly rate) Explosives, storage or handling $ 25.00 Burning permits, limit 2 days per week $ 50.00 per week Fire alarm system (10.06) - based on valuation - see 2.19 ._.__...__..._.._.._ _ 2.24 HEATING & VENTILATING (Chapter 10) A fee for the issuance of a permit for work and for making inspections 411/ pursuant to applicable ordinances shall be as set forth in the sections which follow, except as provided in the State Building Code. A. Job Valuation 0 to $1,000 2% ( .02) of job value - minimum of $10 $1,001 to $10,000 $20 for the first $1,000 plus $1.50 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $10,000. $10,001 to $50,000 $155.00 for the first $10,000 plus $12.50 for each additional $1000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000. $50,001 and up $655.00 for the first $50,000 plus $10.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof. B. Gas Piping Each Opening $3.00 C. Reinspection Fee $30.00 D. Double Fee - all work started without a permit 4111 2.24 HUNTING Landowner free Resident $ 5.00 Non-resident $ 10.00 2.26 INCINERATORS (Section 9.05) 2.27 MOVING A BUILDING (Section 10.05) $1,000 deposit each from the owners of the building and building mover. Moving a building $250.00 Moving a garage only $ 50.00 2.28 PLUMBING (Chapter 10) Fixtures - each $ 6.00 Rough-in fixtures $ 6.00 Setting fixtures on previous $ 6.00 Electric water heater $ 6.00 New ground run for existing building $ 6.00 Sump and receiving tank $ 6.00 Water treating device (softener) $ 10.004111 f. Washer openings $ 2.00 Sillcocks $ 2.00 4111 For extending water lines $ 6.00 Sewage disposal (individual) $ 50.00 Municipal sewer per 100 feet $ 10.00 Municipal water per 100 feet $ 10.00 Meter inspection and sealing $ 15.00 Inside change over - sewer, water or both $ 10.00 For each openings on gas $ 3.00 Storm sewer & sub soil drains per 100 feet $ 10.00 Gas stove $ 6.00 Bar-b-que $ 6.00 Incinertor $ 6.00 Minumum permit fee $ 10.00 Other Inspections and Fees Reinspection fee $ 30.00 each Double fee - all work started without a permit 2.29 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (Section 9.05) 1 - 5 heads $30.00 5 - 25 heads $30.00 first 5 heads plus $17.00 each additional 10 heads or fraction thereof. 4111 26 - 50 heads $64.00 first 25 heads plus $11.00 each additional 10 heads or fraction thereof 51 - 200 heads $97.00 first 50 heads plus $ 7.50 each additional 10 heads or fraction thereof. 201 and up $209.50 first 200 heads plus $ 5.00 each additional 10 heads or fraction thereof. Relocate sprinkler heads, piping or appliances - fees are the same as described above for new installations. Standpipes $25.00 first standpipe plus $ 5.00 each additional standpipe Fire Pump $45.00 S u 2.30 SIGNS (Section 11.70) Up to 33 square feet in size $40.00 4111 33 square feet through 60 square feet in size $50.00 61 square feet to 100 square feet in size $60.00 Each additional 100 square feet or portion thereof not exceeding 300 square feet additional - per year $ 4.00 Each additional 100 square feet or portion thereof over a total of 400 square feet additional $ 5.00 Fees shall not be pro-rated for a period of time less than shown. The surfaces of double or multi-faced signs shall be combined for the purpose of determining the amount of the fee. 2.31 SEPTIC SYSTEM PUMPING (Section 10.02) $ 5.00 2.32 WATER SOFTENING AND FILTERING (Chapter 10) $ 5.00 2.33 WELLS (Section 10.04) $15.00 Development Fees A Development Deposit Agreement is required for Planned Unit Developments, Planned Unit Development amendments, rezoning, platting, site plan review, guide plan changes and environmental assessment worksheets. The deposit amount is based on the following: 0 to 40 acres - $1,000 41 to 80 acres - $1,500 4111 81 + acres , $2,000 Additional funds may be required if the balance in the deposit account is inadequate to pay for all of the fees and costs incurred by the City. 2.34 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D. ) (Section 11.40) $500 minimum + $5/acre • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT $500 minimum + $5/acre - 2.35 ZONING (Section 11.77) Residential 0-10 units - $300 + $5/unit 11 or more - $400 + $5/unit Commercial, Industrial, Office, Public 0-3 acres - $300 + $25/acre 3.1 or more acres - $400 + $25/acre 2.36 PLATTING (Section 12.04) 4110 Residential 0-10 units - $300 + $5/unit 11 or more - $400 + $5/unit Commercial, Industrial, Office, Public 0-3 acres - $300 + $25/acre 3.1 or more acres - $400 + $25/acre SITE PLAN REVIEW Multi-family 0-10 units - $300 min + $5/unit 11 or more units - $400 min + $5/unit Commercial, Industrial, Office, Public 0-3 acres - $300 + $25/acre 3 or more acres - $400 + $25/acre 2.37 CASH PARK FEES (Section 12.40) Single family unit $ 840.00 All other residential $ 840.00 per unit Office, commercial, industrial $2965.00/acre 2.38 SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE PERMITS (11.50) Temporary structure in public waters $ 50.00 Change in structure in public waters $ 50.00 4110 Multiple dock or dock in excess of 75' $ 50.00 Utility charges (Section 3.02) 2.39 SYSTEM ACCESS CHARGES A. For Metropolitan sanitary sewer: as established by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. B. For sanitary sewer - $325 per R.E.C. plus $135.00 $650 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office - plus $135.00 $975 each Metro SAC for commercial - plus $135 For water - $590 per R.E.C. $1180 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office. $1770 each Metro SAC for commercial. 2.40 USER CHARGES A. Sanitary sewer - $1.90 per 1,000 gallons subject to minimum of 4,000 gallons per quarter per R.E.G. B. Water - $.95 per 1,000 gallons subject to a minimum of 4,000 gallons per quarter per R.E.C. 4110 C. The minimum monthly use charge for uses other than residential shall be the same as 1 R.E.C. l D. A residential equivalent connection (R.E.C. ) is one dwelling unit. E. In addition to the charges in A. , B. , C. , and D. each R.E.C. will be billed: $6.25 fixed charge for water and $6.25 fixed 1111 charge for sewer per quarter. F. Unmetered residential sewer only use charges are $20.65 per quarter per R.E.C. plus a $6.25 fixed charge. G. Penalty for billed charges: 1% per month on account not paid within 30 days of billing. H. Administration fee: A $10.00 flat charge is added to the current balance due to obtain the total certified amount. 2.41 WATER/SEWER CONNECTION FEE (Section 3.07) A. In addition to applicable charges listed above, a connection fee of $7400 per single unit is applicable if the property has not participated in the cost of the utilities by other methods. 2.42 FIRE HYDRANT USE/METER FOR CONSTRUCTION AND IRRIGATION A. Permit fee $25.00 B. Fire hydrant damage deposit $200 (applied to the final water bill) C. 3" meter deposit $400 (refundable) D. All other meter deposits $100 (refundable) 4110 2.43 WATER FLOW TEST FOR 5/8" METERS $25 When consumption is challenged by a customer & th emeter is accurate 2.44 WATER SERVICE TURN ON/OFF $25 After the initial turn on, any non- emergency on/off request by a commercial lending institution, government agency (HUD), or private property management service 2.45 NEW CONSTRUCTION COLIFORM BACTERIA RESAMPLING T&M Based on actual laboratory costs, employee time, and utility truck rental rates. These costs are above and beyond the initial sampling costs and is directed at projects that have multiple failures. 2.46 NEW CONSTRUCTION MECHANICAL REINSPECTIONS T&M Directed at projects that require multiple visits to complete initial inspection. Same criteria as 4110 coliform resampling. • SECTION 3. OTHER FEES. RATES AND CHARGES 4110 3.1 GUIDE PLAN CHANGE $500 minimum + $5/acre 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (E.A.W. ) $300 minimum + $5/acre 3.3 ENGINEERING SERVICES TO LAND DEVELOPERS For consultations, utility and street plans and specifications, general and final inspection of improvements and special assessment division (collected at time of final plat): Residential Per unit $40.00/unit (minimum $250.00) Commercial, Industrial, Office and Public Per acre $100.00 per acre (minimum $250.00) Plus cost of review by special consultants necessary as determined by the City Manager. Deposit required. Administrative Land Division $50.00 3.31 CHARGES FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT VACATION FEE Application fee per each transaction for vacating the City"s interest in real property, including right-of-way and easements (for consultation. review, notice mailing, publication of notice, and recording). $200.00 3.4 APPEAL TO BUILDING AND ZONING APPEALS $ 20.00 3.5 ZONING AMENDMENT AND ZONING APPEAL (Appealing to Building Code Board of Appeals) • Zoning amendment $200.00 Variances: Residential (includes residential zoned properties for new construction, building additions, decks, new construction, porches, garages, accessory structures, and variances from all chapters of the City Code. ) $125.00 Other (includes variances associated with properties zoned office, industrial, commerical. Variances associated with platting of property and new construction within the plot. ) $300.00 1110 Plus cost of review by City Staff and/or special consultants necessary as determined by the City Manager. A $150.00 development deposit agreement • ff2 is required. 3.6 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 4111 $10.00 per parcel. No charge for Eden Prairie residents on searches of their homesteaded property. 3.7 MAPS AND PRINTING $ .50 per square foot for miscellaneous printing. $3.00 each for small size (2' x 3' or less) City maps. $5.00 each for large size City maps. $12.50/acre for Mark Hurd Co. topography maps previously purchased by the city, except $5.00/sheet if topo map puchased by other than City and with original purchaser's permission. New order through Mark Hurd Co. - their original charge plus $.50/acre. Duplicating costs: $.50 for the first 5 pages of any file and $.25 for each additional page, plus postage, if any. $75 annual charge for City Council Minutes (pro-rated) $50 annual charge for Planning Commission minutes (pro-rated) 3.8 COMMUNITY CENTER A. Ice Arena Rental - prime-time = (with applicable tax) *Standard size rink = $100.00/hr *0lympic size rink = $105.00/hr 4111 Non prime-time = (with applicable tax)(6 a.m. to 2 p.m. on days when school is in session) *Standard size rink = $50.00/hr *0lympic size rink = $52.50/hr Summer ice time rental rates (May 15 - September 15) Hours Rented Discount Actual Cost 1 hr - 20 hrs $ 5.00/hr $100.00/hr 21 hrs - 50 hrs $10.00/hr $ 95.00/hr 51 hrs - 99 hrs $15.00/hr $ 90.00/hr 100 hrs and more $20.00/hr $ 85.00/hr Hockey games = $100.00/hour (personnel required to run the games supplied by others - school keeps 50% of the gate minus ice time and personnel costs. ) Special Ice: For School District 272 Physical Educational Classes scheduled September - May 7:00 am - 2:00 pm will be charged as follows: $25.00/hr For overnight group rentals, when renting the entire Community Center, ice will be charged as follows: $50.00/hr plus tax (when applicable) Individual open skating fees 17 years and under = $1.00 18 years and older = $2.00 Family skate = $4.00/family Recommended open skating times: Monday, Wednesday, & Friday from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. ; Friday nights from 8 - 11 p.m. ; Saturdays from 1 - 4 p.m. and 8 - 11 p.m. ; and Sunday afternoons (family skate) from 1 - 4 p.m. B. Swimming Pool POOL RETANL RATES: Based on $35.00/hr for 5490 total square feet Cost Per Total Section Area Partition Cost 8 lanes/25 yds 75' x 60' $3.35 per lane $26.80 4500 sq ft Diving Well 22' x 45' N/A $ 8.20 6 lanes/25meters 82'x 45' $3.65 per lane $21.90 990 sq ft Shallow Wing 30' x 60' N/A $13.10 Whole Pool 5490 sq ft see above $35.00 410 Swim meets: $50.00/hr SPECIAL POOL RATES: For Eden Prairie School District Physical Education Classes) Based on $30.00/hr for 5490 total sq ft Cost Per Total Section Area Partition Cost 8 lanes/25 yds 75' x 60' $2.95 per lane $23.60 4500 sq ft Diving Well 22' x 45' N/A $ 6.40 6 lanes/25 meters 82' x 45' $3.25 per lane $19.50 Shallow Wing 30' x 60' N/A $10.50 Whole Pool 5490 sq ft see above $30.00 Individual open swimming fees: Free with membership 19 and older = $2.00 5 - 18 years = $1.00 Tots 4 years and under = $.50 (accompanied by an adult) Recommended open swimming times: Open family and adult swim- ° fining times would be spaced throughout the day Monday throught Friday. Longer sessions would be available on Saturdays and Sundays. Hours would range from 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 hours Monday through Thursday. Friday, Saturday and Sunday would range from 1 1/2 - 4 hours to accommodate family recreational swimming. 4111 C. Racquetball Courts Regular racquetball court rental: $12.00/hr per court Overnight group rental: $12.00/hr per court / $10.00/hr per court if all 3 courts rented. Individual use/members = free Residents $4.00/hr/court Non residents $5.00/hr/court D. Fitness Center Rental = $35.00/hour Individual use = $2.50 Members = free E. Meeting Rooms Eden Prairie non-profit public service groups have priority & free use. Only private profit-oriented groups will be charged for use of meeting rooms. Room B = $10.00 per hour - first floor Room C = $15.00 per hour - second floor 4111 Upper Lobby Area = $10.00 per hour Meeting room = $10.00 per hour - Olympic Ice Arena F. Lockers There is no charge for lockers, but members/guests must provide own locks. G. Membership Fees All memberships will be for twelve months from the date of purchase. Resident Memberships Youth = $ 65.00/year Adult = $125.00/year Family = $175.00/year Sr Citizens = $62.50/year (62 & older) Non-resident Memberships Youth = $100.00/year Adult = $175.00/year Family = $250.00/year Sr Citizens = $87.50/year (62 & older) `1 "f Residents or works in Eden Prairie - can purchase youth, adult or or family membership. 4110 Non-resident can purchase a. an adult membership at non-resident rate. b. youth and family memberships at the non-resident rate Corporate membership - to be eligible for a corporate membership, a company must be located in Eden Prairie. Fee for corporate membership is $500.00/year, in which they would receive five adult memberships, or a fee of $100.00/person for an adult membership in which five is a minimum number that must be a member to get the corporate membership rate. H. Daily Use Fees Ice Arena - open skating 19 and over = $2.00 18 and under = $1.00 Family skate = $4.00 per family Members = free Swimming Pool - open swim 19 and over = $2.00 5 - 18 years = $1.00 4 and under (accompanied by paying adult) = $.50 4110 Members = free Fitness Center $2.50 per day Members = free Racquetball Courts Live or work in Eden Prairie (proof required) _ $4.00 per person per hour. Non-resident = $5.00/person per hour Member = free Maximum court fee = $12.00/hour Wallyball fee = $12.00/hour/court I. Policy of Group Rates and Liabilities Supervision will be at the discretion of the Center Management. This will be based on the number of people to be using the Center as well as the age and type of group. Necessary life guards, building supervisor(s) and people to operate specialized equipment will be provided. Pool - $35.00 per hr used plus sales tax (when applicable). Rate includes 1 lifeguard for up to 25 swimmers. Additional lifeguards must be added as follows at 4110 $7.50 per hour. 26-50 swimmers - 2nd lifeguard required u"7 51-75 swimmers - 3rd lifeguard required • 76 and over - 4th lifeguard required Ice Arena - $50/hr if they rent for more than 2 hours_ and 1110 their program falls within the lock-in time frame, midnight - 5:30 a.m. Racquetball/ Wallyball Courts - $12/hour/court $10/hour when renting all 3 courts Meeting Room C - $5/hour when renting other parts of building $15/hour when renting meeting room only Other Fee Charges: VCR & TV cabinet $10.00/night Racquetball rackets $ 2.00/racket/night Ping Pong tables $ 5.00/table/night Board games $ 5.00/game/night Ice skates $ 1.00/pair/night (young sizes only) Fees are based on use of the Center from 12:00 a.m. to 5 a.m. on a lock-in basis. An insurance policy for liability is also required. The maximum number is a group of 600. Liability limits are $500,000 - bodily injury; $100,000 - property damage; and and $500,000 - personal injury. J. Senior Citizen Discount: 4110 Senior citizens must be 62 or older to receive the following discounts at the Eden Prairie Community Center: *50% off the cost of an adult membership *50% off the cost of all individual Community Center recreation programs offered by the City of Eden Prairie to include: lessons, classes, open swim, open skate, racquetball, fitness center, & table tennis. *Senior Citizens are not required to have a membership at the Community Center in order to receive the 50% discount on Community Center recreation programs K. Boat Rental Rates & Marina Operations Hourly Boat Deposit Rate Max Capacity Minimum Age Canoes $5.00 $3.00 3 12 yrs Row Boats $5.00 $3.00 3 12 yrs Paddle Boats $5.00 $4.00 2 or 4 12 yrs Sail Boats $5.00 $6.00 2 16 yrs 4111 L. Definition of Outdoor Center use Groups: 410 1. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE programs to include youth, adult, senior citizen, adaptive recreation, leisure programs, government or commission meetings. 2. SCHOOL DISTRICT programs to include K-12 activities, Community Education, student co-curricular, parent groups, environmental education. 3. COMMUNITY PROGRAMS to include community service organizations, fraternal associations, churches, athletic and youth associations, neighborhood associations, families and individual citizens, business and corporate groups. The rental user must live or work in Eden Prairie. 4. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS limited to membership or professional development associations whose primary purpose is to promote, nurture, and service the recreation profession. The purpose of the use must be of benefit to the Eden Prairie Recreation program and must be endorsed by an Eden Prairie Recreation Staff person who will participate in the meeting. M. Outdoor Center & Homeward Hills Park Shelter Rental Fees: These fees are not true "rental" but reflect the actual cost of staff supervision for the time of the meeting. 4111 1. CITY PROGRAMS No Fee 2. SCHOOL PROGRAMS $5.00/Hour (no deposit) 3. COMMUNITY GROUPS/ FAMILY GATHERINGS $25/first hour (minimum fee) plus $10/additional hours thereafter, ($50 deposit required) 4. PROFESSIONAL GROUPS $20/hour ($50 deposit) Staff person required to be in attendance N. Outdoor Center Rental Policies: 1. The Outdoor Center shall be available for rental when not programmed for S.L.O.C. activities. Generally, this will be Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Selected weekdays and evenings may be available upon request. Hours available shall be 7 A.M. to 10 P.M. 2. Priority use to be given to the user groups defined beginning with CITY programs and continuing through PROFESSIONAL. 3. Youth groups (under age 18) shall provide one adult chaperone per 10 participants. 3.9 PARK FACILITY FEES Reservations are limited to Eden Prairie residents. Eden Prairie resident' that work in a firm or attend a church outside the City limits may reserve the facility for their company picnics, church picnics, etc. Facility Fee Deposit Indoors Outdoors Round Lake Park Bldg $ 75.00 $ 50.00 60 150 Round Lake Park Pavilion $ 75.00 $ 50.00 75 150 Staring Lake Park Bldg $ 75.00 $ 50.00 60 150 Fireplace Wood $ 10.00 12 logs Pig Roast (exterior electric) $ 10.00 Dunk Tanks (approval required) $ 10.00. Picnic Kit $ 15.00 Outdoor Hockey Rink 9 - 10 P.M. (Sunday - Thursday) $15/hour Staring Lake Park Bldg (Monday - Thursday) $15.00/hr December 15 - February 20 Outdoor Center & Homeward Hills 1. Rental Hours - Saturday & Sunday 6:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. , remainder of days during the week are available. School & City programs have priority during the week. 2. Alcohol - beer & wine are allowed only. No beer kegs allowed inside building. 3. Reservations - They may be made by calling the Eden Prairie Community Center at 937-8727. Only one reservation at a time is allowed. 4111 4. Total Number of Users - October - March 50 April - September 75 No private group of over 300 will be allowed to reserve facilities at any park. (Maximum number at Staring Lake Park will be 150. ) Ballfield reservations are limited to Eden Prairie non-profit public service groups for weekend tournaments at no charge. Groups will be provided with hand drags, rakes and liners with a $100 deposit. The fields will be dragged at the start of each day; however, if the group requests the City to drag the fields after each game, the cost will be $25 per field per day for that service. State Tournament, Regional and National Tournaments would be offered at no cost to the association; however, each association would be limited to one "free" State, Regional or National Tournament per year. 3.10 PLEASANT HILLS CEMETERY FEES Lot Fee - $400 - Resident 80% Perpetual Care & 20% Maintenance $600 - Non-resident Internment Fee - $200 April 15 - November 15 $250 November 15 April 15 $ 50 Cremation Burial Set Grave Markers - $ 50 - Single $100 - Double 4111 3.11 ASSESSING FEES Abatement fee = $5.00 per parcel per year. Copy of Appraisal/Field Card = $2.00 3.12 CITY CODE City Code - bound copy = $25.00 City Code - Chapter 11 = $ 4.00 City Code - Chapter 12 = $ 3.00 3.13 TAX EXEMPT FINANCING CHARGES $800 application fee per each transaction 1/8 of 1% on the unpaid principal balance at the end of each 12 month period This charge is effective for all new projects receiving council authorization on or after March 1, 1991 for the issuance of revenue obligations and for all existing projects which require council authorization on or after March 1, 1991 relating to any aspect of the financing. This resolution has no effect on projects currently responsible for a fee pursuant to resolution nuMber 85-135 and its subsequent reauthorizations. 4110 3.14 FALSE ALARM FEE Each user is allowed three false alarms per calendar year without penalty. A fee of $50.00 is charged for each false alarm in excess of three; $100.00 for each false alarm in excess of 10; and $150.00 for each false alarm in excess of 15 false alarms per calendar year. 3.15 POLICE DEPT FEES Accident Reports/Police Reports - residents free Accident Reports/Police Reports - non residents & mail $3.00 first 2 then $ .50 each Bicycle License $ 10.00 Fingerprinting $10.00 1-3 cards $ 5.00 each addt"l car Video Tape Copies $25.00 each *Duplicating costs: $ .50 for the first 5 pages of any file and '$ .25 for each additional page, plus postage, if any. 4111 *Special request (computer reports) $50.00 minimum Public name list (request report required) $20.00 plus postage 3.16 USE OF CITY SOUND SYSTEM 4111 A. Security deposit $100.00 B. City personnel transport to location, set up $ 40.00 and take down C. Operation of sound system by city staff $ 20.00/hr D. Self contained sound system $ 50.00/day Fees not stated in this Resolution may be set by the City Manager. All Resolutions of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, relating to fees heretofore adopted are hereby repealed. ADOPTED, by the City Council of Eden Prairie this day of 1993. S Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1111 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 93- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TREASURER OR DEPUTY TREASURER TO MAKE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS FOR CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, County of Hennepin, that the City Treasurer of Deputy Treasurer is authorized to make electronic fund transfers with any bank, or other financial institution authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, for investments of excess cash, payment of bond principal, bond interest and a fiscal agent services charges, monthly sales tax, and state payroll withholdings and other banking transactions deemed appropriate by the treasurer. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this day of 1993. 4111 Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 410 DECEMBER 31,1992 30595 CUB FOODS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 79.91 30596 COPIES NOW EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 29.29 30597 DPC INDUSTRIES INC FLUORIDE-WATER DEPT 1405.00 41,98 GME CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION 4098.28 99 SHERWIN WILLIAMS -PAINT/BRUSHES/BRUSH ROLLER CLEANER/POLE- 151.18 WATER DEPT 30600 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE 34104.93 30601 CARL JULLIE EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 130.25 30602 ELIM MANAGEMENT SERVICE RELEASE OF ELIM SHORES TAX INCREMENT FUNDS 39345.80 30603 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LTD PARTNERSHIP -RELEASE OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS TAX 126645.00 INCREMENT FUND 30604 MAINLINE TRAVEL CONFERENCE AIRFARE-PARK MAINTENANCE 221.00 30605 COOKIES BY DEB EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL 11.98 30606 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION LOANS 2038.82 30607 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REIMBURSEMENT OF NET RENT-7835 EDEN COURT 9464.87 30608 ARCHITECTS PROFESSIONAL ASSN SERVICE-STARING LAKE AMPHITHEATER 270.00 30609 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE -STAIN/PADLOCK/CHAIN/HINGES/OUTLET/PAINT 230.33 -ROLLERS/HOOKS/KEYS/KEY RINGS/BATTERIES/ -PLIERS/HEATER/NUTS & BOLTS/WASHERS/RUST -REMOVER/DUCT TAPE/STREET DEPT/PARK MAINT/ COMMUNITY CENTER 30610 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER -ANCHORSBOLTS/PLUGS/PAINT/PAINT ROLLERS/ 946.34 -TRAY & LINER/SPRAYER/LAMP TIMER/GASKETS/ -VALVES/WEATHER SEALER/EXTENSION CORDS/ -BLADESBATTERIES/PIPE WRENCH/HOOKS/TAPE/ -LINT TRAPS/GLOVES/BIRD FEEDERS/BULBS/ -BRACKETS/CHAIN/COUPLERSBIRD SEED/BOOT -MAT/LIGHTS/COFFEE MAKER/PLIERS/TEA KETTLE/ 4111 -FORKS/SHOVELS/LADDERS/DRILL SET/SANDPAPER/ -SCREWDRIVERS/HINGES/MOTOR TUNE-UP/MAGNET -FITTINGS-FACILITIES DEPT/FIRE DEPT/PARK -MAINT/COMMUNITY CTR/SENIOR CTR/UTILITIES DIVISION :30611 STATE OF MINNESOTA 1992 MINNESOTA STATUTES-POLICE DEPT 175.72 30612 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE BOOK-ASSESSING DEPT 202.00 30613 ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATIONS INC -HAPPENINGS BOOKS-REIMBURSED BY CITY 380.00 EMPLOYEES 30614 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC -APPLICATION FEE FOR EMISSIONS TESTS- 250.00 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30615 JENNIFER ANDIS REFUND-YOUTH SKI TRIP 14.00 30616 ROBIN BURNS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 30617 LAURIE CHURCHILL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 30618 ERIC CROSBY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 11.00 30619 KARL DEAN REFUND-GYMNASTICS LESSONS 21.00 30620 MARY KENNEDY REFUND-YOUTH SKI TRIP 14.00 30621 LEWIS & BETTY KINNE REFUND-SENIOR HOLIDAY LUNCHEON 17.00 30622 ELIZABETH MORAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 19.00 30623 MARGARET MCARTHUR REFUND-PHOTO MANAGING CLASS 5.00 30624 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC -FINAL PAYMENT FOR DESIGN OF TH5 FROM 35597.74 CSAH 4 TO CSAH 17 30625 MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY COLLEGE CONFERENCE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 40.00 30626 PROJECT ADVENTURE INC TRAINING VIDEOS & BOOKS-FIRE DEPT 195.14 30627 U S POSTMASTER DOG LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS-CITY HALL 375.00 30628 FINANCIAL MASTERPLAN INC COMPUTER SOFTWARE-ASSESSING DEPT 403.00 029 FIRST BANK EDEN PRAIRIE PAYROLL 12-8-92 & 12-11-92 71079.46 32800604 1 DECEMBER 31,1992 30630 EAGLE WINE CO WINE 53' 78 30631 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR 54 30632 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR 126 . 2 30633 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE 164.20 30634 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO WINE 7185.70 30635 PRIOR WINE CO WINE 1624.89 30636 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR 3798.28 30637 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT 703.58 30638 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC INSTALLED BALLAST KIT & BULB-FIRE STATION 322.26 30639 MENARDS -SECURITY CABLE/PADLOCK/EXTENSION CORDS/ 215.88 -HAMMERS/HOOKS/DOORBELL/TRANSFORMER/ • -VACUUM CLEANER-POLICE DEPT/STREET MAINT/ LIQUOR STORE/PARK MAINT 30640 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSN CONFERENCE-PARK & RECREATION DEPT 1319.00 30641 SPECIALTY CONTRACTING INC WATERMAIN REPAIR-WATER DEPT 1631.50 30642 TRIA D VIKESLAND -OFFICE SUPPLIES/MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE 86.23 RECREATION PROGRAM 30643 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LICENSE-ROUND LAKE PARK CONCESSION STAND 144.00 30644 TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD CO -RAILROAD CROSSING PERMIT FEES-COUNTY RD 4 950.00 TRAIL BRIDGE 30645 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 11.92 30646 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 6232.35 30647 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 95.97 30648 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING 513.57 30649 PATRICIA BARKER EXPENSES-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON 210.54 30650 PATRICIA BARKER EXPENSES-HOLIDAY LUNCHEON 221.54 30651 LOGIS POSTAGE-HOMESTEAD APPLICATION CARDS 26411k7 30652 HOPKINS POSTMASTER POSTAGE-SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER impr 30653 STATE OF MINNESOTA BIKE REGISTRATIONS 81.00 30654 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUYERS CARDS-LIQUOR STORES 60.00 30655 MINNEGASCO SERVICE 29808.40 30656 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE 20184.16 30657 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-11-92 130.25 30658 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 12-11-92 & PAYROLL 12-08-92 42178.78 30659 ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORP MIX 76.75 30660 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 8910.00 30661 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER 15322.25 30662 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME CO MIX 30.00 30663 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 15417.19 30664 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX 836.86 30665 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MIX 579.28 30666 POGREBA DISTRIBUTING INC BEER 546.90 30667 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER 16265.80 30668 JULIE ABRAHAM REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 30669 MINNESOTA COMMERCE DEPARTMENT NOTARY COMMISSION APPLICATION-FINANCE DEPT 40.00 30670 MARK STILLMAN ENTERTAINMENT-SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 75.00 30671 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CONFERENCE-SENIOR CENTER 20.00 30672 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE -AGRICULTURAL LIMING MATERIAL LICENSE- 150.00 WATER DEPT 30673 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSE RENEWAL-WATER DEPT 5.00 30674 SPIRIT COACHES INC. -DEPOSIT-BUS SERVICE FOR ADULT & FAMILY 200.00 SKI TRIP 30675 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 12-11-92 30676 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 12-11-92 30677 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 12-11-92 164.50 19808726 h r�'/ DECEMBER 31.1992 30678 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 12-11-92 SAVINGS BONDS 300.00 30679 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE CO PAYROLL 12-11-92 6609.00 O0680 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 12-11-92 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 280.00 D 681 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SER PAYROLL 12-11-92 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTION 225.69 0682 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 12-11-92 2773.76 30683 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PAYROLL 12-11-92 32.00 30684 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG DECEMBER 92 UNION DUES 1270.00 30685 AT&T SERVICE 72.75 30686 AT&T CREDIT CORPORATION SERVICE 99.76 30687 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE 304.99 30688 STAN BANN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 6.00 30689 MARY BOYCE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 30690 KATHRYN PELTO REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 30691 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER NOVEMBER 92 BUILDING SURCHARGES 4039.56 30692 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM NOVEMBER 92 SAC CHARGES 31878.00 30693 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 41.23 30694 BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS REFUND-OVERPAYMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION 289.17 30695 JAMIE DILLON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS 17.00 30696 PENNY TAYLOR REFUND-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 30.00 30697 ARNOLD THOMPSON REFUND-SKATING LESSONS 47.00 30698 JULIE TOSKEY REFUND-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM 15.00 30699 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-ENGINEERING DEPT 345.00 30700 JAMES G CLARK DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE 200.00 30701 CHRIS ENGER DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE 200.00 30702 JOHN FRANE DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE 200.00 30703 ALAN D GRAY OCTOBER/NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 92 EXPENSES 618.90 30704 ROBERT LAMBERT -OCTOBER & DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE & 527.50 EXPENSES Alip705 KEVIN SCHMIEG NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE 400.00 706 STEVE SINELL DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE & EXPENSES 214.50 30707 NATALIE SWAGGERT DECEMBER 92 CAR ALLOWANCE & EXPENSES 205.80 30708 MN DEPT OF REVENUE WATER SERVICE QTRLY CONNECTION FEE 16538.00 30709 EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE RELIEF ASSOC -CITYS PORTION OF EDEN PRAIRIE VOLUNTEER 376066.00 FIRE RELIEF PENSION 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 11-27-92 13927.64 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 12-8-92 1247.14 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 12-11-92 13590.02 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 11-27-92 5283.00 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 12-11-92 5435.00 33000 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 12-30-92 5516.00 44000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE NOVEMBER 92 SALES TAX 33650.89 29748 VOID OUT CHECK 44.40 30047. VOID OUT CHECK 20.00 30052 VOID OUT CHECK 1496.33 30087 VOID OUT CHECK 4098.28 30195 VOID OUT CHECK 74.80 30201 VOID OUT CHECK 146.11 30305 VOID OUT CHECK 59.00 30399 VOID OUT CHECK 704.78 30437 VOID OUT CHECK 274.9E 30492 VOID OUT CHECK 216.21 30504 VOID OUT CHECK 1139.00 30554 VOID OUT CHECK 1634.7C 30580 VOID OUT CHECK 19.95 411,580 VOID OUT CHECK 64.98 51253681 DECEMBER 31.1992 30649 VOID OUT CHECK 210.54- 29822 VOID OUT CHECK 15.00- 30710- VOID OUT CHECKS 411100 -22554 $1038404.57 a • DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS S 10 GENERAL 265047.70 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 47.58 15 LIQUOR STORE - P V M 38827.80 17 LIQUOR STORE - PRESERVE 27124.79 18 LIQUOR STORE - PRAIRIEVIE 54255.93 22 STATE AID CONST 35597.74 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 39.27 73 WATER FUND 30659.68 77 SEWER FUND 32656.18 79 ROAD ACQUISTION LOAN FUND 11503.69 81 TRUST & ESCROW FUND 587.41 82 FIRE RELIEF FUND 376066.00 92 TIF ELIM SHORES/PV APTS 165990.80 $1038404.57 4110 4111 6qD JANUARY 5.1993 30714 MEDCENTERS HEALTH PLAN JANUARY 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 18479.05 30715 MEDICA CHOICE JANUARY 93 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM 43382.30 30716 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA JANUARY 93 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 0 30717 DOREEN ALDRICH 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT uO 30718 ORRIN ALT 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30719 ROBERT BARLI 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30720 ANNETTE BEACH 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 325.00 30721 DAVID BECKER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30722 JEFFREY BERG 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30723 V JAMES BERGSTROM 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30724 BILL BLAKE 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30725 BRIAN BLANCH 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30726 MICHAEL BOSACKER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30727 LANCE BRACE 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30728 LES BRIDGER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30729 THOMAS BROWN 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30730 SHAWN CAMPBELL 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30731 DAN CARLSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30732 DON CHOUINARD 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30733 JAMES CLARK 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30734 JOHN CONLEY 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30735 JOYCE CONLEY 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30736 DEAN CORDER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30737 JAMES DEMANN 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30738 KYLE DUCHSCHERE 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30739 BRENT DUPONT 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30740 JAMES FRANZEN 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30741 LYNN GARRY 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT iiii° 30742 KATHLEEN HEBERT 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 0 30743 JAMES KLINE 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT . 0 30744 MOLLY KOIVUMAKI 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 375.00 30745 ALLEN LARSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30746 JAMES LINDGREN 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30747 TRACY LUKE 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30748 JAMES MATSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30749 JULIE MEINZER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 375.00 30750 BRADLEY MILES 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30751 CHRISTOPHER MILLARD 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30752 SANDRA MITCHELL 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 325.00 30753 JAMES MORROW 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30754 MARGARET MUNRO 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30755 CURTIS OBERLANDER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30756 ROBERT OLSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30757 DENNIS PAULSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30758 ROBERT REYNOLDS 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30759 ANDREW ROHDE 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30760 PAULINE SAGER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 375.00 30761 TINA SAUGESTAD 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 375.00 30762 JAMES SCHLOSSMACHER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.00 30763 JOHN SORENSEN 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.0C 30764 PATRICIA SULLIVAN 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 375.0C 30765 DONALD SWENSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.0( 30766 RANDALL THOMPSON 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 500.0C 30767 PETER VOSBEEK 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT OC 30768 GREGORY WEBER 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT qv( 8678535 .-, , n + t JANUARY 5.1993 30769 WILLIAM WYFFELS 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-PoLICE DEPT 58c �30770 JULIE YARUSSO 1993 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE-POLICE DEPT 32.F 30771 A AARONS REFUND-MECHANICAL PERMIT IC 30772 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER -TABLE RENTAL/PIANO DOLLY RENTAL-FIRE DES; 60. PARK MAINT 30773 ABBOTT PAINT & CARPET CO PAINT ROLLERS-WATER DEPT 76. 30774 THE ABERDEEN GROUP SUBSCRIPTION-STREET DEPT 15.C,;_ 30775 KEN AHRENS REIMBURSEMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE CLEANING 92.Oi 30776 AIRSIGNAL INC -DECEMBER 92 PAGER SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/ 432.41 FIRE NiTy 30777 AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOC INC SUBSCRIPTION ASSE SINGNTER DEPT 144.00 30778 AMERICAN FORESTS SUBSCRIPTION-FORESTRY DEPT 45.00 30779 AMERICAN RED CROSS RESCUE MANIKIN RENTAL-POOL LESSONS 157.09 30780 AMERON POLE PRODUCTS DIVISION STREET LIGHTS-STREET DEPT 2679.54 30781 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY COPY PAPER-CITY HALL 553.99 30782 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC -SIGNS/POSTS/STRAPS/BUCKLES-STREET DEPT/ 1874.05 30783 ANDERSONS GARDEN PARK MAINTENANCE EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 36.95 30784 PAT ARENT PHOTO MGMT INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR CTR/FEES PAID 26.00 30785 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS INC FASTENERS-PARK MAINTENANCE 50.00 30786 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INFORMATION CT PUBLICATION-PLANNING DEPT 4.00 30787 ATHLETIC TECHNOLOGIES -LEAGUE SCHEDULER COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1254.57 -PROGRAM/MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAMS 30788 B & S TOOLS -KEY/BRAKE SPRING TOOL/CHISELS/MIRRORS/ 606.95 -SPRING RELEASE/DRILL BITS/MICROMETER/HOLE -SAW/DRILLBATTERIES/VISE GRIP/PLIERS/ SCREWDRIVER-STREET DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION 41,0789 BACONS ELECTRIC CO WELL REPAIR-WATER DEPT 262.20 30790 WBCS -SERVICE-TYPESETTING WINTER SENIOR CENTER 20.00 NEWSLETTER 30791 MICHAEL BARONE EXPENSES/MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 29.47 30792 BAUER BUILT TIRE & SVC -TIRE REPAIR/WHEEL ALIGNMENTS-EQUIPMENT 337.00 MAINTENANCE 30793 ANNETTE BEACH MILEAGE-POLICE DEPT 5.00 30794 DENISE BECK SERVICE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION INSTRUCTOR 30.00 30795 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC -FLOODING HOSE/HYDRAULIC MOTOR/DASHER 528.68 BOARD CLEANER-COMMUNITY CENTER 30796 BELL ATLANTIC TRICON LEASING CORP -JANUARY 93 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-POLICE 35 8.68 DEPT 30797 BRIAN BENIK SERVICE-SANTA VISIT TO CO 30798 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-LEONA ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNALNITY CENTER 70.00 30799 STEVE BERGREFUND-OVERPAYMENT1299.64 30800 BEST COPIERS OF EAGAN INC COPIER REPAR -CITYUHALL TILITY BILLING 751.76 51.76 30801 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 537.35 30802 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON -NOVEMBER 92 KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL 245.00 DEPT 30803 BLUMBERG COMMUNICATIONS INC -EDITING CONTROLLER/CONTROL CABLE-POLICE 3512.78 DEPT 30804 BOYD OIL DISTRIBUTING HYDRAULIC OIL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 667.70 30805 LANCE BRACE TRAINING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 20.6Z 30806 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING INC -SERVICE-2MG ELEVATED TANK/SANITARY SEWER 41749.35 1111 -EXTENSION TO MILLER PARK/MILLER PARK/ -MITCHELL RD RETAINING WALL/ROWLAND RD/DELL -RD/BRAXTON DR/CREEK KNOLLS CUL-DE-SACS/ BLUFFS EAST 12TH ADDITION 5947131 30807 BRUCE 7-33EN HOMES REFUND-PARK FEE 840.00 30808 BRO-TEX INC PAPER TOWELS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 246.47 30809 BROWN & CRIS INC -HAULED RIP RAP TO BOTTOM JF RAVINE- 490.00 PURGATORY ""EEK TRAIT_; 3081E TOM BROWN REFUND-OVERPAYnEivT UTILITY BILLING 74 30811 BRW INC SERVICE-VAL,LEY VIEW RD/DELL ROAD 318 6.80 30812 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC SAND-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 446.63 30813 BSN SPORTS SOCCER CONES-ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY CENTER 125.40 30814 TOM BUCHNER -SERVICE-GUIDANCE FOR QUALITY EXECUTIVE & 6000.00 -STEERING COMMITTEES & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT TEAMS 308 .E 3UCKINGHAM DISPOSAL INC -DECEMBER 92 WAS'77 nT 7nSAJ 7,Q 17,12- -T=-- 144.99 mAil ','LIQTJC ` STORES 30816 BUSINESS MACHINES SALES & SVC TYPEWRITER REPAIR-POLITE DEPT 103.67 30817 -TOL COMMUNICATIONS -RADIO REPAIRS/FUSES/FAN/EARPHONE JACK/ 637.91 -SPEAKER GRILL CLOTH/LCD DISPLAY-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT 30818 CARGILL SALT DIVISION SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET DEPT 5123.54 30819 CARLSON & CARLSON ASSOC -NOVEMBER 92 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE-HUMAN 445.00 RESOURCES DEPT 30820 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO INC REPLACED COOLER FAN MOTORS-LIQUOR STORES 217.27 30821 CARTRIDGECARE INC PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES-CITY HALL 83.07 30822 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC -TONER/LASERJET PRINTERS-HUMAN RESOURCES 3541.29 DEPT/BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT 30823 AARON CLARK BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 96.00 30824 CLASSIC POOLS PLUS INC LEAF RAKE-COMMUNITY CENTER 23.54 30825 CLEAN SWEEP INC TENNANT BROOMS-PARK MAINTENANCE 827.89 30826 CLUTS OBRIEN STROTHER ARCHITECTS SERVICE-REMODELING CPT BLDG FOR CIVIC CTR 63672.46 30827 CO2 SERVICES CHEMICALS-POOL MAINTENANCE-COMMUNITY CTR 4628 30828 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION -SERVICE-MATERIAL TESTING & INSPECTION- 96 DELL ROAD 30829 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS -GLOVES/SAFETY CUTTER/CLEANING SUPPLIES- 255.95 WATER DEPT 30830 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC CO OVERLOAD RELAY BLOCK-SEWER DEPT 171.90 30831 COPY EQUIPMENT INC -OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT/STREET 187.14 DEPT/PARK PLANNING 30832 CORNER HOUSE -1993 SERVICE FOR CHILDREN REPORTING 2270.00 SEXUAL ABUSE-POLICE DEPT 30833 CORPORATE RISK MANAGERS INC JANUARY 93 INSURANCE CONSULTANT 700.00 30834 R M COTTON CO SEAL KIT-WATER DEPT 119.02 30835 CLIFF CRACAUER MILEAGE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 86.00 30836 CROWN MARKING INC DESK SIGN-COMMISSION MEMBER 17.98 30837 CRYSTEEL DIST INC TRUCK SPOOL ROLL TARP-STREET DEPT 877.25 30838 CUB FOODS EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT 90.56 30839 CULLIGAN - METRO SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER 33.40 30840 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC -DRILL BITS/SILICONE/NUTS & SCREWS-PARK 398.96 MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30841 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER DEPT 6573.49 30842 J H DAHLIIEIER ENGR INC -SERVICE-PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE-PURGATORY CREEK 211.90 TRAILS 30843 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 144.52 30844 DECISION RESOURCES LTD SERVICE-RESIDENTIAL SURVEY 6580.00 30845 DELTA INDUSTRIES MFG INC FIRE HOSE TESTER-FIRE DEPT 2650.67 30846 DEM CON LANDFILL INC NOVEMBER 92 WASTE DISPOSAL-STREET MAINT 52.5C 13709915 4111 JANUARY 5.1993 30847 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 7325.: *0848 DUKART GARAGE DOOR SERVICE -TRANSMITTERS/RECEIVERS/TRANSFORMERS/ 606.0 -INSTALLED RADIO CONTROLS-STREET DEPT/ UTILITIES DIVISION 30849 WES DUNSMORE EXPENSES-PARK MAINTENANCE 41.7, 30850 DYNA SYSTEMS NUTS & BOLTS/LOCKS-WATER DEPT 391.9, 30851 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS INC ART PACKAGES-COMMUNITY BROCHURE 309.4, 30852 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -EXPENSES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT/HUMAN 79.0( RESOURCES DEPT 30853 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD -VALVE/BELT/TUBE ASSEMBLY/SHAFT/LEVER- 197.a EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30854 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 -EXPENSES-UNITED WAY FUND RAISER/BUS 567.9E -SERVICE-SPECIAL TRIPS PROGRAM & SENIOR -PROGRAMS/ROOM RENTAL-ADULT PROGRAMS! COPIES-SENIOR CENTER 30855 CITY OF EDINA NOVEMBER 92 WATER TESTS-WATER DEPT 250.00 30856 DEB EDLUND MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION 125.0C 30857 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS MANHOLE RINGS-SEWER DEPT 164.3S 30858 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC -PAINT DUST MISTER/GLOVES/OXYGEN SENSOR- 254.11 UTILITIES DIVISION 30859 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT INC PUMPER TRUCK REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 155.82 30860 ENVIROSCIENCE -SERVICE-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT- 1775.00 PROPOSED CITY HALL SITE 30861 EPR INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE 31.01 30862 DELANO ERICKSON ARCHITECTS -SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION/ 5385.00 -COMMUNITY CENTER PLAZA & PARKING PROJECT/ HIGH SCHOOL LOCKER ROOMS 4,0863 RON ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 165.00 0864 TIMOTHY J ESS HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 270.00 30865 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-CITY HALL/S W METRO TRANSIT- 110.52 30866 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE-WATER DEPT 890.02 30867 FESTIVE DISPLAYS CHRISTMAS WINDOW PAINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER 30.0C 30868 FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO GARBAGE BAGS-WATER DEPT 106.4E 30869 FITNESS WHOLESALE -EXERCISE BANDS-FITNESS CLASSES-COMMUNITY 41.1' CENTER 30870 FLAGHOUSE INC -GAMES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND/SAFETY CAMP/ 211.E ACTIVITY CAMP 30871 FLAGSHIP ATHLETIC CLUB MEETING EXPENSES-FINANCE DEPT 39.4 30872 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME CO SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 264.0( 30873 FLEET MECHANICAL SERVICES -REPAIR & REFINISH TRUCK BOX/TRACTOR- 2170.42 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30874 MILT FLOYD SQUARE DANCE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 205.00 30875 FLOYD SECURITY -SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 460.5 CUMMINS GRILL HOMESTEAD/LIQUOR STORES 30876 SAMUEL FRENCH INC CATALOGUE SET-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM 5.6E 30877 FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE WRENCH SETS WITH BRACKETS-FIRE DEPT 283.5E 30878 KATE GARWOOD CASSETTE TAPES-ADMINISTRATION DEPT 12.7E 30879 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP -FIRE TRUCK FRONT CAB DOOR REPAIRED/ 1113.41 TAILBOARD & CORNER ASSEMBLY REPAIRED-FIRE 30880 GENZ-RYAN PLBG & HTG REFUND-HEATING PERMIT 92.9E 30881 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY -PAINT ROLLERS/TRAYS/BRUSHES/SCRAPERS/ 539.5E TRAY & LINERS-WATER DEPT 4,882 GNERER WELDING INC -CUTTING EDGE/PUNCH & COUNTER SINK-PARK 113.11 MAINTENANCE 30883 CHARLES A GOBLE EMERGENY TECHNICIAN BAGS-FIRE DEPT 106.5C 2489104 JANUARY 5,1993 30884 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC NOVEMBER 92 SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION 30885 W W GRAINGER INC PIPE WRENCHES-STREET DEPT .5 30886 GRINNELL CORPORATION PIPE CLAMPS-WATER DEPT .21 30887 HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 175.1( 30888 THE HALE COMPANIES INC FUEL CARDS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 164.5E 30889 HANCE HARDWARE -VACUUM BAGS/DUCT TAPE/PAINT ROLLERS! 125.12 BRUSHES/TRAY LINERS/PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE 30890 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC -SERVICE-CSAH 18 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS/ 21048.8E -SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION FROM LIFT STATION -TO MILLER PK/BLUFFS W 9TH ADDITION/CEDAR -RIDGE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION/RIVERVIEW RD/ -BRAXTON DR/CREEK KNOLLS/BLUFFS E 11TH ADDITION/MEADE LANE 30891 HARMON GLASS COMPANY -WINDSHIELD/WINDSHIELD REPAIR/SAFETY SHEET- 456.0E PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30892 HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS DUES-POLICE DEPT 40.00 30893 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEE-ENGINEERING DEPT 69.0C 30894 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OCTOBER 92 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT 2406.1E 30895 HENNEPIN PARKS NATURALIST PROGRAM/SPECIAL TRIPS/FEES PAID 18.0( 30896 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE -LUNCHES-SENIOR PARTY/E P ATHLETIC ASSN 1748.2f DINNER-SPECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM 30897 D C HEY COMPANY INC -COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS-FIRE DEPT/ 239.9C STREET MAINT 30898 HODGES BADGE COMPANY INC AWARDS-POOL LESSONS 138.6S 30899 HOFFERS INC PAINT/MINERAL SPIRITS-PARK MAINTENANCE 55.71 30900 CARTER HOLMES BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 416.0C 30901 TODD HOLZMER -SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER-ADAPTIVE .0C RECREATION PROGRAM 30902 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC -NOVEMBER & DECEMBER 92 COMMUNITY 38 8.2E NEWSLETTER 30903 HSB RELIABILITY TECHNOLOGIES ORACLE LICENSE/UPGRADES-WATER DEPT 3030.2E 30904 ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMERICA DUES-COMMUNITY CENTER 257.5C 30905 IMPULSE CONCEPTS INC -HOCKEY CLOCK REPLACEMENT SCREEN-COMMUNITY 42.6C CENTER 30906 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC FLUORESCENT LIGHTS-WATER DEPT 143.2E 30907 INLAND TRUCK PARTS CO -THREADED RODS/NUTS & WASHERS-EQUIPMENT 30.5S1 MAINTENANCE 30908 INTL ASSN OF ASSESSING OFFICERS SUBSCRIPTION-ASSESSING DEPT 35.0C 30909 GARY ISAACS OFFICIALS COORDINATOR/FEES PAID 130.0C 30910 LYNETTE ISAACS VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 48.0C 30911 BRENDA JERDE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 128.0( 30912 JOHNSON/ANDERSON INC ENVELOPES-COMMUNITY CENTER 212.61 30913 JEAN JOHNSON MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT 11.0C 30914 SCOTT A KIPP EXPENSE/MILEAGE-PLANNING DEPT 5.3E 30915 JEFFREY KOVASH VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 72.0C 30916 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY -WIPERS/MASK RESPIRATORS/GLOVE LINERS/KNEE 385.32 PADS-WATER DEPT 30917 LAGERQUIST CORPORATION -FREIGHT ELEVATOR PRESSURE RELIEF TEST- 260.0C WATER DEPT 30918 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 1506.4S 30919 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC -SWITCHES/ARM REST/REFLECTORS/WINTER FRONT/ 321.02 -REGULATOR/HANDLE/CYLINDER-EQUIPMENT MAINT/ SEWER DEPT 30920 JOHN LANDERS SERVICE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION INSTRUCTOR 0.72 30921 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD -NOVEMBER 92 PROSECUTION SERVICE-$8083/ 79875.6; -AIRPORT ZONING-$443/JUNE 92 LEGAL FEES- 11780839 1) i -$14266/JULY-$16852/AUGUST-$12271/SEFT- $15220/OCTOBER-$12738 30922 BOB LANZI MILEAGE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM 140.75 30923 LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & -NOVEMBER 92 LEGAL SERVICE-WETLAND PERMIT 1620.00 ISSUES 924 L MCI T LIABILITY INSURANCE 46342.00 4111)925 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC -NOVEMBER 92 LEGAL SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD 1382.32 LANDFILL 30926 LESMANN ENTERPRISES INC -REPAIR & REFINISH CHEV BLAZER/ 2 PICKUPS- 1919.29 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30927 KEN LEWIS & ASSOCIATES APPRAISAL SERVICE-RILEY CREEK ACQUISITION 500.00 30928 LOGIS NOVEMBER 92 SERVICE 8956.96 30929 LUNDS EXPENSES-UNITED FIRE FIGHTERS MTG-FIRE DEPT 462.84 30930 LYMAN LUMBER CO STUDS FOR SIGNS-STREET DEPT 14.65 30931 JIM MANFRED HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 545.00 30932 MARQUETTE CAMERA REPAIR CAMERA PART-POLICE DEPT 32.00 30933 ROBERT MASON HOMES REFUND-PARK FEE 840.00 30934 MASS ARMY NAVY STORE UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 183.89 30935 MASYS CORPORATION -COMPUTER & SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1476.70 AGREEMENTS-POLICE DEPT 30936 JOHN MATTIACCI VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 64.00 30937 MBA DESKTOP PUBLISHING PLUS -TYPESETTING-STARING LK OUTDOOR CENTER 212.90 WINTER PROGRAMS 30938 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC -EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/SENIOR 97.08 CENTER/WATER DEPT 30939 AHMAD MCGOWAN BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 126.00 30940 MCGRAW HILL INC BOOK-PLANNING DEPT 40.45 30941 MCNEILUS STEEL INC -COUPLINGS/FITTING-PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT 416.87 MAINTENANCE 30942 MEDICAL OXYGEN & EQUIP CO OXYGEN-FIRE DEPT 58.65 41,943 JULIE MEINZER CONFERENCE EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT 20.25 944 MENARDS -KEYS/CARRIAGE BOLTS/ROPE/LUMBER/ELBOWS/ 1010.22 -VENTHOOD/CORDS/HINGES/BRUSHES/SCREWS/ -PAINT/BOLTS/WASHERS/TREATED TIMBERS/ -FIBERGLASS/CHIMNEY BRUSH/BIFOLD DOORS/ -HEATER-POLICE DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/LIQUOR -STORE/PURGATORY CREEK TRAILS/HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM 30945 METROPOLITAN AREA MGMT ASSN DUES-CITY COUNCIL 15.00 30946 METRO SALES INC COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT 1684.00 30947 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMM JANUARY 93 SEWER SERVICE 149813.00 30948 KAREN MICHAEL EXPENSES/MILEAGE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 103.64 30949 MIDAS BRAKE & MUFFLER PIPES/MUFFLER/CLAMPS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 144.39 30950 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO STEEL PLATE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 54.68 30951 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 489.89 30952 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS -OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ 691.02 SENIOR CENTER/COMMUNITY CENTER 30953 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 260.25 30954 MIDWEST TELETRON INC SWITCHBOARD EAR PADS-CITY HALL 5.00 30955 MINNCOMM PAGING -DECEMBER 92 PAGER SERVICE-STREET MAINT/ 38.8E WATER DEPT 30956 MPLS AREA ASSN OF REALTORS SUBSCRIPTION-ASSSESSING DEPT 140.4i 30957 MN ASSN OF ASSESSING OFFICERS DUES-ASSESSING DEPT 450.00 30958 MINNEAPOLIS- HEALTH DEPARTMENT LABORATORY TESTS-POLICE DEPT 67.6C •22042064 i JANUARY 5,1993 30959 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES 632.85 30960 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY -TILES/RAMPS/CHROME REDUCERS/CAPS/GAUGES- ill52 FIRE DEPT 30961 MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN DUES-PARK MAINTENANCE 7700 30962 MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADS-SKATING RINKS 80.75 30963 MISCO COMPUTER GLARE SHIELDS-CITY HALL 85.67 30964 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO TRANSFORMER-WATER DEPT 29.00 30965 MON-RAY WINDOWS INC -SERVICE-WINDOW INSTALLATION-HOUSING 919.50 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 30966 MOTOROLA INC RADIO REPAIR-FIRE DEPT 218.71 30967 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO -CLEANED AIR FILTER/REPLACED FUEL FILTERS/ 1004.68 -DECK BELTS/PACKED REAR WHEEL BEARINGS/ -CLEANED BATTERIES/CHECKED WHEEL HUBS/ TIRES & BRAKES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 30968 RICHARD L MUELLER PH D COMPUTER SOFTWARE SERVICE-FIRE DEPT 50.00 30969 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT 148.99 30970 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT 104.34 30971 NCR CORPORATION -CASH REGISTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 268.78 COMMUNITY CENTER 30972 JAN NELSON -MINUTES-HUMAN RIGHTS & SVCS COMMISSION/ 225.00 CITY COUNCIL 30973 BETH NILSSON SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID 24.50 30974 NORTHERN HYDRUALICS INC HITCH PINS-SEWER DEPT 44.40 30975 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS FACSIMILE PAPER-CITY HALL 217.12 30976 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO -CITYS SHARE OF WINTER BROCHURE-ADAPTIVE 265.29 RECREATION PROGRAM 30977 OFFICE PRODUCTS OF MN INC -KEYBOARD RENTAL-CITY HALL/CALCULATOR- 253.24 LIQUOR STORE 30978 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT/FIRE DEPT .50 30979 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC -TURNBUCKLES/GLOVES/WRENCHES/DIE HEADS- 622.81 PARK MAINT/UTILITIES DIVISION 30980 OPTIMIST CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE CHRISTMAS TREE-COMMUNITY CENTER 22.50 30981 PATRICK & CO DOG & PET LICENSE TAGS-CITY HALL 302.49 30982 PEAK STAFFING INC -MINUTES-PLANNING COMMISSION/HISTORICAL & 203.70 CULTURAL COMMISSION 30983 PEDERSON SELLS EQUIPMENT CO INC COUPLINGS/BOLTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 399.67 30984 J C PENNEY UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT 150.75 30985 PERFORMANCE DIMENSIONS PUB BOOK/VIDEO-POLICE DEPT 52.90 30986 PITNEY BOWES INC -POSTAGE METER RENTAL-CITY HALL/POSTAGE 340.17 METER SOFTGUARD RENTAL-POLICE DEPT 30987 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC POOL HEATER CONTROL REPAIR-COMMUNITY CTR 146.85 30988 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING TREE TRIMMING DOOR HANGERS-STREET DEPT 84.19 30989 PRAIRIE VIEW FRAMING CO PHOTO-FIRE DEPT 66.31 30990 PRESTO CLEANING SYSTEMS CARPET CLEANING-LIQUOR STORE 200.0C 30991 JERRY PRODOEHL MEETING EXPENSES-STREET DEPT 8.5C 30992 R & R SPECIALTIES INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER 63.2C 30993 RAINBOW FLOWER SHOP EXPENSES-CITY HALL 42.4C 30994 RAND MCNALLY COMMERICAL MAP-POLICE DEPT 181.0C 30995 REACH EQUIPMENT SWITCH-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 130.0z 30996 AAGE REFFSGAARD -STATE PLUMBING LICENSE-BLDG INSPECTIONS 45.0C DEPT 30997 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MN CASH REGISTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-LIQUOR 1104.6.c 30998 CITY OF RICHFIELD -SERVICE-POND STUDY-DAY CAMP PROGRAM/ OC ACTIVITY CAMP PROGRAM 30999 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC -SERVICE-BRIDGE ABUTMENTS DESIGN/WATERMAIN 166 .Cr -IMPROVEMENTS/STARING LN & SUNRISE CIRCLE/ 2699608 r hl\ ROWLAND RD/INDIAN RD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 31000 RITZ CAMERA FILM-BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPT 70.23 31001 KRISTINE ROEGLIN EXPENSES-AFTERSCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 2.56 31002 ROLLINS OIL CO GAS/DIESEL FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 11501.62 .003 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS COMPANY TUBING/SOLDER/FITTINGS-WATER DEPT 285.82 004 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO SOLENOID VALVE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 172.16 31005 SAFETY SHORT PRODUCTION INC VIDEO CASSETTES-UTILITIES DIVISION 370.30 31006 SA-AG INC SAND-PARK MAINTENANCE 356.46 31007 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC TOYS & GAMES-SOCIAL PROGRAMS 30.73 31008 JOHN SAMS EXPENSES-ASSESSING DEPT 12.50 31009 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER 66.24 31010 DAVE SCHNEIDER BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 64.00 31011 WILBUR W SCHULTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 16.00 31012 RON SCHWARTZ VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 448.00 31013 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS DIVISION LAB SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 35.21 31014 SEARS TAPE MEASURES/SOCKET SET-PARK MAINTENANCE 85.10 31015 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC -SERVICE-COMPUTER CONSULTATION-EQUIPMENT 18.00 MAINTENANCE 31016 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC -POLO SHIRTS/RUBBY SHIRTS/SWEATSHIRTS-FIRE 1278.75 DEPT/POLICE DEPT 31017 ERIC SIT KARATE INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID 193.20 31018 SKIL CORPORATION BRUSH/SWITCH-PARK MAINTENANCE 28.90 31019 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC BATTERIES-SENIOR PROGRAMS 5.30 31020 SNYDER DRUG STORES INC BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT 9.55 31021 KEVIN SOHL REFUND-OVERPAYMENT UTILITY BILLING 45.61 31022 SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT BUS SERVICE-ADULT PROGRAMS 111.00 31023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMM 1993 OPERATING BUDGET 5775.76 31024 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC LEGAL PUBLICATIONS-CITY HALL 337.18 31025 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-SKATING RINKS 89.60 31026 THE SPECTACLE SHOPPE INC PRESCRIPTION PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR-FIRE DEPT 85.00 4,027 SPORTS WORLD USA SWEATSHIRTS-LIQUOR STORES 576.00 028 SPS COMPANIES FAUCET STEMS-PARK MAINTENANCE 47.71 31029 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS INC -CHAIR-FIRE DEPT/OFFICE SUPPLIES-UTILITIES 836.18 DIVISION 31030 STANDARD HEATING -HUMIDIFIER INSTALLATION-HOUSING 309.00 REHABILITATION PROGRAM 31031 STANDARD SPRING CO -REAR SPRINGS/NUTS & BOLTS/PINS/FRONT 1405.10 -SPRINGS/WHEEL ALIGNMENTS/BALANCED FRONT TIRES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31032 STERLING GROUP INC SERVICE-CPT BLDG ACQUISITION 9675.00 31033 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC SERVICE-DELL RD/GEORGE MORAN DRIVE 18715.87 31034 SULLIVANS SERVICES INC SERVICE-STORM DRAIN VACUUMED-SEWER DEPT 101.99 31035 SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS SERVICE-ROWLAND ROAD 221.75 31036 SWINGS REC DRIVING RANGE RENTAL-GOLF LESSONS 942.50 31037 KATHY TEKIELA EXPENSES-FALL SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 39.62 31038 TOM TESCH EXPENSES-STREET DEPT 10.60 31039 JEANE THORNE INC MINUTES-PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION 369.00 31040 GUY THOSPENSON VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 64.00 31041 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-PARK PLANNING DEPT 511.05 31042 KEVIN TIMM BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID 384.00 31043 TNEMEC COMPANY INC PAINT-WATER DEPT 607.34 31044 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS INC CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM 278.91 31045 TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD SERVICE-DELL ROAD 36117.87 31046 TWIN CITY .GARAGE DOOR CO DOOR REPAIR-WATER DEPT 162.12 4287039 JANUARY 5.1993 31047 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO -OXYGEN/ACETYLENE/CARBON DIOXIDE-EQUIPMENT 216.36 MAINTENANCE/COMMUNITY CENTER 31048 TWIN CITY TESTING -SERVICE-SOIL & BITUMINUS TESTING/ 541/00 -ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MIXTURE TESTING-VALLEY VIEW ROAD 31049 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT 609.09 31050 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MAPS-POLICE DEPT 13.59 31051 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC -GLOVES/BUSHINGS/PIPE REDUCERS/NUTS & 294.69 BOLTS-PARK MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 31052 BRENDA UTING MILEAGE-SENIOR CENTER 16.73 31053 JIM VAN HORN REFUND-HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT 300.00 31054 VERTEC INC VRIA REPEATER-POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 1800.00 31055 VICOM INC WIRE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-COMMUNITY CTR 275.85 31056 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHT BULBS-PARK MAINT/LIQUOR STORE 111.70 31057 VWR SCIENTIFIC INC LAB SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT 210.00 31058 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP CO WASHERS-SEWER DEPT 46.01 31059 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION-FINANCE DEPT 139.00 31060 WALTERS SWIM SUPPLIES INC HANDLOCK FLOATS-POOL LESSONS 55.45 31061 WATERPRO REPAIR COUPLINGS-SEWER DEPT 230.68 31062 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN SERVICE-PRAIRIE CENTER DR TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2098.00 31063 THE WINE SPECTATOR SUBSCRIPTION-LIQUOR STORE 40.00 31064 WAYNE WOODFORD REFUND-MECHANICAL GAME LICENSE 25.00 31065 X-ERGON CLEANING SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT 128.60 31066 ZACKS INC -CHAIN/HOOK/INDUSTRIAL CLEANER/SPRAYERS/ 874.58 -SPRAY BOTTLES/TOWELS/FUNNELS/SHOVELS- STREET MAINT/EQUIPMENT MAINT 31067 JIM ZAIC -STATE MASTER PLUMBING LICENSE-BUILDING iiii00 INSPECTIONS DEPT 31068 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -1ST AID SUPPLIES-STREET MAINT/SKATING 1,34 RINKS/WATER DEPT 31069 ZIEGLER INC -GENERATOR INSPECTIONS/CALIBRATION OF 754.08 EMERGENCY ENGINES-WATER DEPT 11000 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND PAYMENTS 154447.13 11000 NORWEST BANK BOND PAYMENTS 663533.00 11000 NATIONAL CITY BANK BOND PAYMENTS 66604.80 89879168 $1665134.03 • 410 6L1I7'J 4111 DISTRIBUTION BY FUNDS 10 GENERAL 307163.59 11 CERTIFICATE OF INDEBT 7332.57 15 LIQUOR STORE - P V M 3143.12 17 LIQUOR STORE - PRESERVE 1411.79 18 LIQUOR STORE - PRAIRIEVIE 1004.27 21 POLICE FORFEITURE 1800.00 22 STATE AID CONST 6140.91 25 TRANSIT SYSTEM 91.55 28 COMMUNITY BLDG FUND 82679.96 30 CASH PARK FEES 1680.00 31 PARK ACQUIST & DEVELOP 1514.36 33 UTILITY BOND FUND 12509.74 37 C/C 2ND SHEET ICE 4965.00 39 92 PARK REF IMP 1426.25 44 UTILITY DEBT FUND 773437.80 45 UTILITY DEBT FUND ARB 121.00 47 89 RECREATION REFUNDING 241.13 53 IMPROVEMENT DEBT FUND 110785.00 60 IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 2235.66 62 IMPROVEMENT CONST FD 147232.07 73 WATER FUND 25841.72 77 SEWER FUND 153160.33 • TRUST & ESCROW FUND 1320.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOP GRANT 1896.07 90 TAX INCREMENT CONSTRUCTIO 15950.14 $1665134.03 4111 ,_ 7 t • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. -93 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.05, SUBD. 5, OF THE CITY CODE WHICH RELATES TO DELINQUENT TAXES AND CHARGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE GRANTING OF BEER, WINE, AND LIQUOR LICENSES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 . City Code Section 4 .05, Subd. 5, is hereby amended to read as follows: "SECTION 4 .05. STANDARDS. Subd . 5. Delinquent Taxes and Charges . No license under this Chapter shall be granted for operation on any premises upon which taxes, assessments, or installments thereof are owed by the applicant and are delinquent and unpaid, except those delinquent and unpaid taxes, assessments, or installments thereof ( a) which are the subject of an agreement between the taxpayer and the Hennepin County Treasurer that _provides for the payment of the delinquent and unpaid taxes, assessments, or installments, together with any penalty and interest thereon in twelve ( 12) equal monthly payments commencing on or before the date the license is granted , and further provides that any unpaid amount, together with any additional penalty and interest will be paid on or before the date of the payment of the last installment, and (b) the licensee shall have entered into an agreement with the City that in the event the taxpayer has not complied with the terms of the agreement with the Hennepin County Treasurer, such noncompliance shall be sufficient grounds to suspend or revoke the license. For the purpose of this Section, "applicant" includes persons and related persons owning, directly or indirectly, . ( 1) at least a fifty percent (50%) beneficial interest in the proposed licensee or in an entity owning such interest in the proposed licensee or in the entity making the application and (2) at least an undivided one- half interest in the premises proposed to be licensed or SS ZO 'd £1L06Z8ZT9 NOSN3O3NO A 1ndd ONO, 173: 0T 113M Z6-0£-03a at least a fifty percent (50%) beneficial interest in the4110 entity owning such premises. Section 2 . City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 4 . 99, entitled "violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3 . This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 199 , and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1993. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of S 1993 . • S —7 20 'd 2 T L06Z8Z T 9 NOSN30321J ' A1(ltld 9Nti1 t z: 0 i aam Z6-02-331I • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL MEETING DATES, TIME AND PLACE FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COUNCIL IN 1993 AND APPOINTING AN ACTING MAYOR BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that they meet on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:30 P.M. in the Eden Prairie City Hall Council Chambers, 7600 Executive Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Roberts Rules of Order will prevail. BE IT RESOLVED, that is hereby appointed to be the acting Mayor in the absence of the Mayor. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day 4110 of January, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 411/ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93- The City Council of the City of Eden Prairie hereby designates as the Director and as the Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for 1993. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on this 5th day of January, 1993. Douglas B. Tenpas, Mayor ATTEST: 4111 SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk • 4111 III! RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Minnesota, as follows: is hereby designated to serve as a director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and is hereby designated to service as alternate director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1992 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEP IN CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Eden Prairie hereby certify that the attached and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of Eden Prairie at its- meeting on January 5, 1993, as the same is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of such council for said date, on 4111 file and of record in my office. Dated this day of , 1993. John D. Frane, City Clerk (SEAL) City of Eden Prairie FOX, McCUE& COMPANY, P.A. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE 41111 EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344 FAX(612)944-8496 JOHN E.FOX,C.PA. EDEN PRAIRIE WILLIAM M.McCUE.C.P.A. (612)944-6166 JOHN J.BRAND,C.P.A. BELLE PIAINE DAN C.KIND,C.PA, December 17, 1992 (612)445-6693 Mr. John Frane Finance Director City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Frane: We are pleased to submit this proposal to serve as the independent auditors for the City of Eden Prairie for the 1992 calendar year. Our role as auditors not only includes the performance of sufficient audit pro- cedures with regard to the City's financial statements in order to render an opinion thereon, but also requires additional reporting with respect to your internal control structure and compliance with laws and regulations as they may pertain to the financial statements and your federal financial assistance programs. The scope of the audit has been significantly affected in recent years as a result of changes in accounting and disclosure rules promulgated by our accounting profession and federal oversight agencies - changes that are expected to benefit persons , such as yourself, who need to be appropriately informed of the financial position and operations of the City. The Single Audit Act of 1984 (federal legislation) requires recipients of federal grant funds to coordinate their annual audit with an audit of its federal financial assistance programs if $100,000 or more of federal funds are received annually. Although the City normally receives less than $100,000 annually from the federal monies received indirectly through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Interior and Department of Housing and Urban Development , a single audit will be necessary as a result of a subrecipient agreement with Hennepin County in connection with the CDBG program. As a result of performing the City of Eden Prairie audit since 1978, our firm's personnel are experienced with the City's operational characteristics, and possess appropriate levels of knowledge with respect to governmental entities. We also possess the knowledge of the City's operations and the professional training and audit experience to review and revise our engagement approach to obtain a more efficient and effective audit process. Due to the involvement by your finance department staff in the report document, we would assist in the production of a "client submitted" format as opposed to 1111 our firm's bound cover. -2- Based on a preliminary estimate of hours required to complete the financial and compliance procedures and reports, we expect our charges to range from $26,000 - $28,000. As part of the audit engagement we would be available for any meetings that you, Carl Jullie, or the City Council might desire. We would also be available to meet with the City Council at the completion of the audit to review the audited financial statements, the evaluation of internal control structure, and our financial comments letter which highlights trends and important issues in the various funds. Primary fieldwork is expected to be performed in April or May, with delivery of the completed reports by June 15, 1992. Interim audit procedures (such as compliance testing and evaluation of the internal control structure) will be arranged in early January to ensure timeliness of the audit report issuance in June. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to continue serving as the independent auditor for the City of Eden Prairie. If you have any questions or desire further information, please contact us. We will be happy to discuss the nature of the engagement and the degree of our qualifications. Sincerely, ohn Brand4111 CC: Carl Jullie City Manager FOX, McCUE & COMPANY, P.A. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE • EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 55344 FAX(612)944-8496 JOHN E.FOX,C.P.A. EDEN PRAIRIE WILLIAM M.McCUE,C.P.A. (612)944-6166 JOHN J.BRAND,C.PA. BELLE PLAINE DAN C.KIND,C.PA. (612)445-6693 December 17, 1992 John Frane, Finance Director City of Eden Prairie 7600 Executive Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Frane: This letter is to confirm our understanding of the terms and objectives of our audit engagement and the nature and limitations of the services we will provide. Our engagement will be designed to perform the following services: 1. We will audit the general purpose financial statements of the City of Eden Prairie as of December 31, 1992, and for the year then ended, in accordance . with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. We will perform an audit of such general purpose financial statements, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole, and, accordingly, we will express such an opinion on them. The audit will be made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining, individual fund and individual account group financial statements will be presented for purposes of additional analysis but are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements. Such information will be subjected to audit procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose financial statements sufficient for us to express assurance on that information in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. We reserve the right to mark certain schedules and statistical information "unaudited" in the case where sufficient audit procedures have not been performed. 2. As a part of the audit, we will perform a study and evaluation of the City's internal accounting control systems and applicable internal administrative controls over federal financial assistance programs as required by govern- ment auditing standards and OMB Circular A-128. This study and evaluation is more limited than would be necessary to express an opinion on the inter- nal control systems of your internal control structure and administrative controls over federal financial assistance programs. 1110 C0 U1 -2- 3. We will report on the City's compliance with respect to laws and regulations which may have a material effect on the City's financial statements and regulations governing federal financial assistance programs as required by generally accepted government auditing standards and OMB Circular A-128 with negative assurance on transactions and records not tested. 4. We will report on the City's compliance with applicable State of Minnesota Statutes as outlined in the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government, with negative assurance on transactions and records not tested. 5. We will provide commentary and recommendations concerning 1992 financial highlights and issues as we consider appropriate. It is important that you understand that our engagement is not primarily or specifically designed, and cannot be relied upon, to disclose defalcations and other similar irregularities by City employees or others. If reproduction or publication of financial statements prepared by us is intended (or any portion thereof) , it is our policy that any masters or printers proofs be submitted to us for review if our firm's name will be mentioned. As we have discussed, our charges for services will be based upon our proposal dated December 3, 1992. As a result of conditions not now foreseen, we reserve the right to increase our fee but only after consultation with you. Invoices for our services will generally be issued on a monthly basis and are due and payable ten days after receipt. We will be pleased to discuss this letter with you at any time and to explain 4110 the reasons for any items. If the terms and services outlined herein are accept- able to you and in agreement with your understanding, please sign this letter in the space provided and return it to us to acknowledge receipt. Sincer Joy n J. B and The terms and services outlined in the foregoing letter are acceptable to me and in agreement with my understanding. Date John Frane Date Carl Jullie cc: Carl Jullie, City Manager