Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 08/16/2011 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP & OPEN PODIUM TUESDAY,AUGUST 16, 2011 CITY CENTER 5:00—6:25 PM, HERITAGE ROOM II 6:30—7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Kathy Nelson, and Ron Case CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Rob Reynolds, Fire Chief George Esbensen, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Communications Manager Joyce Lorenz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Recorder Lorene McWaters Workshop-Heritage Room II I. HUMAN RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMMISSION II. LRT Open Podium - Council Chamber III. ABDIMALIK MOHAMED—FAMINE IN SOMALIA& SOMALI YOUTH ORGANIZATION IV. ADJOURNMENT Human Rights & Diversity Commission O CITY NCIL WORKSHOP AUGUST 16 , 2011 EDEN PRAIRIE 1 Human Rights & DiversityCommission . 0 _._______.....____ ___. Commissioners ....._ ..... ...._ = ___________.._ ___. ___. ___ ______._____. _______ Pam Spera — Chair ...... = ___. ..._. _...________........__ ___ _____ _...________....._., ..._._ Peter Huck - Vice-Chair _____ = ___. ...._ ___________... ___ ...... ________._____ .... ....... Linda Crawford ___________........ ___ ...... __.______...._ ..... ..._. ___________.... ___. __... Rob Rozanski __.___________ ..... ........._ ___________..... ___. ____. ________..._ ___ ...... Gayle Sanders _..,.._________.___ __. ___ ___...___ _____ _____ _....... _____ ____ PG Narayanan ____. ____ ___ _______ _____,..____ Zina Nourkadi ____ _____ Manifesto 0 ; That we, as representatives of Eden Prairie businesses, city government, educational and religious institutions, accept special roles and responsibilities in fostering diversity in our community. We are dedicated to upholding the rights of everyindividual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardess of religious affiliation, race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability, or economic status. Representing all sectors of Eden Prairie, we publicly declare our intentions: To continue the development of a multicultural community which will not tolerate acts of harassment and intolerance; To establish, communicate and encourage community standards that respect diversity; and To promote acceptance and respect for individuals in an atmosphere of caring for others. Adopted by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of May 1993. Reaffirmed by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 4th day of January 2000. 0 Presenting two items — both are related to the manifesto. � The EP Manifesto wording change The Domestic Partner Registry Why These Issues? . 0 _ ---,. To keep the Council informed about issues relevant to a flourishing and inclusive community. To keep the Manifesto a living document. I Manifest^ 0 We are dedicated to upholding the rights of every individual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardless of religious affiliation, race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability, or economic status. I Proposed Manifesto Amendment The _ _ _ ______ _____ . _ 0 _.... . = __----- -=-,- ------- Proposal: -I-- 1 Amend the Manifesto to clarify the term "religious affiliation." I Proposed Manifesto Amendment , 0 _ Rationale: The phrase "regardless of religious affiliation" may not encompass people with no religion. � Recent polls have shown that as many as 13 to 15% of the US population consider themselves non-religious or have no religious affiliation. (Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life -2007) l Proposed Manifesto Amendment _ _ _ ______ ______ . _ 0 : ......Discussion: .... . . . _ � _ � Does "regardless of religious affiliation" include non- religious people by definition or implication? Yes — by legal interpretation No — by common usage & dictionary definitions Therefore clarification is appropriate. Proposed Manifesto Amendment ..._ _ _ ______ _____ . . _ 0 : --- ------------ __---- -=--------- Minnesota Protected Class: _ __. � Does the Manifesto need to adhere to the specific language used in the Minnesota Human Rights Act? No, because the language in the Manifesto already differs. .... 0 m-.-. -. — _ Minnesota Statute EP Manifesto Race Race Color Ethnic Heritage Creed - Religion Religious Affiliation Sex Gender Marital Status - Disability Physical or Mental Ability Age Age Sexual Orientation Sexual Orientation Public Assistance Economic Status National Origin - Proposed Manifesto Amendment ..._ _ _ _____ ______ . _ 0 _ ..... _...... ........... ....... --,.... -.. i Option 1: Amend the phrase "religious affiliation" to ...... —___ _.. _. "religious or secular affiliation" or "religious or non-religious affiliation" "We are dedicated to upholding the rights of every individual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardless of religious or non-religious affiliation, race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability or economic status." Proposed Manifesto Amendment _ _ _ ____ ______ . . _ 0 ..... _...... . . _ ...... _-._ . . - 0pt10n2 : : _i __ Delete "religious affiliation" and replace it with "wor view." "We are dedicated to upholding the rights of every individual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardless of race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability, economic status or worldview." Proposed Manifesto Amendment _ _ _ _ ______ . . _ 0 . _..... . . _ _ ... ...... . . -- ----_- . _ Option 3 : . :. _ _ --- A blend of Options 1 & 2 : "We are dedicated to upholding the rights of every individual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardless of religious or secular worldview, race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability or economic status." I Proposed Manifesto Amendment , 0 _ ______ _____ _ ..... _..... Recommendation: The Commission voted to recommend Option 1, simply inserting the term "non-religious" thus amending the Manifesto sentence to read: "We are dedicated to upholding the rights of every individual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardless of religious or non-religious affiliation, race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability or economic status." Proposed Manifesto Amendment 0 - One need not agree with, embrace, or even like agnostics, atheists, freethinkers, humanists, skeptics, non-theists, non-religious, irreligious, people without religion or adherents to an unaffiliated religion in order to advocate, or at least tolerate, their inclusion in a vibrant and diverse community. Human Rights & Diversity Commission DOMESTIC PARTNER REGISTRY EDEN PRAIRIE Domestic Partner Registry 0 ________. Purpose The domestic partnership registry is to provide a means by which unmarried, committed couples who reside or work in Eden Prairie and who share a life and home together may document their relationship. Domestic Partner Registry 0 ,i- : . Definition Domestic Partner. Any two adults who meet all the following: Are not related by blood closer than permitted � under marriage laws of the state. Are not married. � Are competent to enter into a contract. Are jointly responsible to each other for the necessities of life. I Domestic Partner Registry 0 Definition - con't. .� Are committed to one another to the same extent as married persons are to each other, except for the traditional marital status and solemnities. � Do not have any other domestic partner(s). Are both at least i8 years of age. � At least one of whom resides or works in Eden � Prairie. Domestic Partner Registry 0 T Benefits Supports the mission of the Eden Prairie Manifesto � Assists people in receiving benefits such as i bereavement leave � insurance benefits � club memberships (health club — community center) family leave i homestead designation Honors all partnerships that fall outside the traditionally accepted husband-wife model. Communities with Domestic Partner Registries ______,m 0 . Community Year Registry Filing Fee # Established Registered Duluth 2009 I I[$25 27 Edina 2010 $25 9 Golden Valley 2011 $40 8 Maplewood 2011 $20 Minneapolis 1991 $20 1652 Red Wing 2011 $50 1 Richfield 2011 $30 5 Robbinsdale 2011 $20 Effective 8/15 Rochester 2010 $50 21 St. Louis Park 2011 $50 10 St. Paul 2009 $20 122 I ANNOTATED AGENDA DATE: August 12, 2011 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Rick Getschow, City Manager RE: City Council Meeting for Tuesday, August 16, 2011 TUESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2011 7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER I. ROLL CALL /CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. COLOR GUARD/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION Open Podium is an opportunity for Eden Prairie residents to address the City Council on issues related to Eden Prairie city government before each Council meeting, typically the first and third Tuesday of each month, from 6:30 to 6:55 p.m. in the Council Chamber. If you wish to speak at Open Podium,please contact the City Manager's office at 952.949.8412 by noon of the meeting date with your name,phone number and subject matter. If time permits after scheduled speakers are finished, the Mayor will open the floor to unscheduled speakers. Open Podium is not recorded or televised. If you have questions about Open Podium, please contact the City Manager's Office. IV. PROCLAMATIONS /PRESENTATIONS A. COMMENDATION - TIMOTHY TAORMINA Police Chief Rob Reynolds will present the commendation. On July 20, a group of 65 children from a church in Savage was traveling on I-494 when the driver of the bus passed out due to a medical emergency. Timothy Taormina, a chaperone, immediately responded and guided the bus to safety. B. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT PRESENTATION Cris Gears, Superintendent of Three Rivers Park District and Commissioner John Gibbs will present an overview of current Three Rivers Park District activities and the many amenities offered in and around Eden Prairie. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS MOTION: Move to approve the agenda. VI. MINUTES MOTION: Move to approve the following City Council minutes: ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16,2011 Page 2 A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,JULY 19, 2011 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,JULY 19, 2011 C. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/BUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP HELD APRIL 28, 2011 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Move approval of items A-I on the Consent Calendar. A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. METROPOLITAN CAR DEALERSHIP by Thomas Grossman Family L.P. Second Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment in the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 16.2 acres, Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres, Preliminary Plat on 16.2 acres into two lots Location: 12475 Plaza Drive (Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment, Resolution for Site Plan Review) C. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR METROPOLITAN ADDITION D. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF 2011 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS E. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION FOR MINNESOTA CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK F. ADOPT RESOLUTION REQUESTING A LIMITED-USE PERMIT FOR NON- MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL FROM TH 212 BRIDGE TO RILEY LAKE ROAD G. AUTHORIZE WINTER LRT TRAIL USE AGREEMENT WITH THREE RIVERS PARK H. AWARD CONTRACT FOR EAST STARING LANE WATERMAIN EXTENSION I. APPROVE BANEBERRY HOLLOW SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE by Marsh Cove, LLC Request for Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres and from Church to Parks and Open Space on 5.21 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16,2011 Page 3 Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres, Preliminary Plat on 11.62 acres into 16 lots and 1 outlot. Location: 17850 Duck Lake Trail. (Resolution for Guide Plan Change; Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) (Continued from July 19, 2011) Official notice of this public hearing was published in the July 7, 2011,Eden Prairie News and sent to 87 property owner. Synopsis: This is a continued item from the July 19, 2011 City Council meeting. The revised plan has 16 lots. The cul-de-sac has been moved to the north for a total length of 650 feet. The proposed park dedication area has been reduced from 5.38 to 5.12 acres. The number of waivers has been reduced from 40 to 3. Tree loss is the same. The plan provides a trail access outlot. Eleven of the 16 homes have been moved to the 30 foot front yard setback. This leaves more room in the rear yards for additions and decks. It should be required that the homes be built according to the front yard setbacks as shown on the plan. MOTION: Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.5 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space 5.12 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.62 acres, and Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.5 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 11.62 acres into 16 lots, 1 outlot, and right-of-way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and Commission recommendations and Council conditions. B. PRAIRIE RIDGE by Manley Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres, Preliminary Plat of 9.69 acres into 22 lots and 1 outlot. Location: 17555 Duck Lake Trail. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Official notice of this public hearing was published in the August 4, 2011,Eden Prairie News and sent to 91 property owner. ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16,2011 Page 4 Synopsis: This project is a 22 single family residential development. All lots meet the R1-13.5 zoning district requirements. A PUD waiver is needed to accommodate the cul-de-sac length. MOTION: Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers, and Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 9.69 acres into 22 lots, one outlot and road right-of-way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and Commission recommendations and Council conditions; and • Approve and Authorize Issuance of a Grading Permit for the Prairie Ridge project subject to release by the City Engineer upon determination that the final contract documents conform to plans stamp dated August 4, 2011, as approved by the City Council. C. GE CAPITAL ECO EXPERIENCE CENTER by GE Capital Corp. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 42 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 11.19 acres, Site Plan Review on 11.19 acres and Preliminary Plat on 11.19 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot. Location: 3 Capital Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Official notice of this public hearing was published in the August 4, 2011,Eden Prairie News and sent to 91 property owner. Synopsis: The proposed use of the property is for an Eco Experience Center. The plan includes a 6,620 square foot two story office building with a ground level garage for 12 vehicles, 6 charging stations for electric vehicles, and a .44 mile driving course for electric vehicles. For this area of the property, the 1978 approved plan included future development of 360,000 square feet in 3 buildings and 3-multi level parking decks. In 1997 GE Capital received City approval of an amendment to the 1978 plan showing the same square footage, but in a different arrangement for the building and parking. Waivers are requested for building height and exterior materials. ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16,2011 Page 5 MOTION: Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 42 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.19acres, and Zoning District Amendment in the Office District on 11.19 acres; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and Commission recommendations and Council conditions; and • Approve and Authorize Issuance of a Grading Permit for the GE Capital Eco Experience project subject to release by the City Engineer upon determination that the final contract documents conform to plans stamp dated August 1, 2011, as approved by the City Council; and • Approve and Authorize Issuance of a footing and foundation permit for the GE Capital Eco Experience Project subject to release by the Chief Building Official that the building permit conforms to plans stamp dated August 1, 2011, as approved by the City Council. D. THUNDERBIRD AVIATION by Nancy Grazzini-Olson Request for Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres. Location: 14091 Pioneer Trail. (Resolution for Site Plan Review) Official notice of this public hearing was published in the August 4, 2011, Eden Prairie News and sent to 5 property owner. Synopsis: This project is a new 7,678 sq. ft. full service aviation facility. The Metropolitan Airports Commission is also reviewing the plans. MOTION: Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres E. PARK AND RECREATION PROPOSED FEES FOR 2012 Synopsis: Staff is submitting the proposed changes to fees and charges for inclusion in the 2012 budget. On June 6, 2011 this item was reviewed and discussed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and was unanimously recommended for City Council approval. A notice of the public hearing appeared in the August 11, 2011 edition of the Eden Prairie News. These fees and charges are a part of the annual operating budget within the Parks and Recreation Department and help offset operating expenses. ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16, 2011 Page 6 Proposed changes from 2011 to 2012 include the following: Park Building/Pavilion and Room Rentals • Increases were made to room rentals and park building/pavilion rentals fees. • Meeting room rental rates were adjusted to reflect room size and layout. • Equipment rental fee option was added for the Senior Center room rentals. Programs • A non-prime time fee was created for Racquetball court rental. • A non-prime time fee was created for Play Structure use. • An administrative fee was created for non-paid overdue tree/weed ordinance violations. • Grave Markers setting and Internment fees increased based on direct contractor charges. • Community Center membership rates increased by 3%. MOTION: Move to: Approve the proposed Park and Recreation fees and charges for inclusion in the 2012 budget. IX. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS X. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS XI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS XII. APPOINTMENTS XIII. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. Recognition of Fred Haffner Fred Haffner, an Eden Prairie Fire Department"Charter Member," passed away on July 21st, 2011. During Fred's career, he served first as a firefighter and then as Captain of Squad Two. Fred retired after 18 years of dedicated service in 1985. Fred was a person of integrity and dedication to his family, his career and the role he played with the Eden Prairie Fire Department. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16,2011 Page 7 1. Donation to the Community Theater Program Synopsis: Recently, the director of the children's show"The Trial of Goldilocks"was approached by one of the children in the show. She handed an envelope to the director. Later the director opened the envelope and to her surprise the child's parents had made a generous donation to the Eden Prairie Players. Last year the same family made a donation of$500 that was used to repair and add to the theater curtains at the barn. MOTION: Move to: Accept the anonymous donation of $1,000 to be used by the Eden Prairie Players for the purchase of equipment or supplies needed to enhance the theater program. 2. Donation to Parks and Recreation for Park Amenities Synopsis: Parks and Recreation staff was recently contacted by a person who grew up in Eden Prairie and expressed an appreciation for the experiences that he and his friends were able to have in the parks and recreation programs while growing up. He wanted to express his appreciation by making a donation towards parks or programs and wanted to remain anonymous. He did not want to specify further where the money went, but asked that staff make the decision on his behalf. During the conversation he mentioned that he was a cross-country runner in high school and made extensive use of the trail system. Staff has identified the drinking fountain at the Staring Lake - west park lot as needing replacement. The recommendation is to use this money in order to fund the replacement and upgrade to a fountain that separates the people and dog drinking area and allows for filling water bottles and jugs. A similar fountain was installed near the Cummins Grill House approximately two years ago and has received a great deal of positive feedback from park visitors. MOTION: Move to: Accept the anonymous donation of $2,000 to be used to replace and upgrade the drinking fountain at the Staring Lake Park—West Parking Lot. E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1. Baker Road Lane Configuration Synopsis: On August 4, 2011, at Forest Hills Elementary, City and County personnel presented an alternative lane configuration for Baker Road between Highway 62 and St. Andrews Drive. Approximately 60 citizens attended the meeting. A review of all comments received via open house comment cards, phone and e-mail showed 13 were in favor of the change while 50 were opposed. Roughly 7 were neutral on the matter. Due to the lack of public support for this alternative, staff recommends restriping the pavement in its current configuration once the surfacing improvements have been made. ANNOTATED AGENDA August 16,2011 Page 8 F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIV. OTHER BUSINESS XV. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Move to adjourn the City Council meeting. AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,AUGUST 16, 2011 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Kathy Nelson, and Ron Case CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, City Planner Michael Franzen, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Jan Curielli I. ROLL CALL /CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER II. COLOR GUARD / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. COUNCIL FORUM INVITATION IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS A. COMMENDATION - TIMOTHY TAORMINA B. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT PRESENTATION V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS VI. MINUTES A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,JULY 19, 2011 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,JULY 19, 2011 C. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/BUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP HELD APRIL 28, 2011 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. METROPOLITAN CAR DEALERSHIP by Thomas Grossman Family L.P. Second Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment in the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 16.2 acres, Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres, Preliminary Plat on 16.2 acres into two lots Location: 12475 Plaza Drive (Ordinance for PUD District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment, Resolution for Site Plan Review) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 16, 2011 Page 2 C. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR METROPOLITAN ADDITION D. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF 2011 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS E. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION FOR MINNESOTA CRIMINAL JUSTICE DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK F. ADOPT RESOLUTION REQUESTING A LIMITED-USE PERMIT FOR NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL FROM TH 212 BRIDGE TO RILEY LAKE ROAD G. AUTHORIZE WINTER LRT TRAIL USE AGREEMENT WITH THREE RIVERS PARK H. AWARD CONTRACT FOR EAST STARING LANE WATERMAIN EXTENSION I. APPROVE BANEBERRY HOLLOW SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE by Marsh Cove, LLC (Continued from July 19, 2011) Request for Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres and from Church to Parks and Open Space on 5.21 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres, Preliminary Plat on 11.62 acres into 16 lots and 1 outlot. Location: 17850 Duck Lake Trail. (Resolution for Guide Plan Change; Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) B. PRAIRIE RIDGE by Manley Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres, Preliminary Plat of 9.69 acres into 22 lots and 1 outlot. Location: 17555 Duck Lake Trail. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) C. GE CAPITAL ECO EXPERIENCE CENTER by GE Capital Corp. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 42 acres, Planned Unit District Review with waivers and Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 11.19 acres, Site Plan Review on 11.19 acres and Preliminary Plat on 11.19 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot. Location: 3 Capital Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 16, 2011 Page 3 D. THUNDERBIRD AVIATION by Nancy Grazzini-Olson Request for Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres. Location: 14091 Pioneer Trail. (Resolution for Site Plan Review) E. PARK AND RECREATION PROPOSED FEES FOR 2012 IX. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS X. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS XI. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS XII. APPOINTMENTS XIII. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS 1. Recognition of Fred Haffner B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR 1. Donation to the Community Theater Program 2. Donation to Parks and Recreation for Park Amenities E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1. Baker Road Lane Configuration F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XIV. OTHER BUSINESS XV. ADJOURNMENT ITEM NO.: IV. A. pOLICE PxOTECT AND S UWE' T RPDE DEPNMEY I st 16 , 2011 EDEN A EDE � PRAIRIE MINNESOTA Timothy Taormina Commendation A1000 on the morning of July 20, a group of 6 children from a church in Savage was traveling west on I-44vhen the driver of the bus passed out and slumped over in his seat as a result of a medical emergency. Timothy Taormina, a chaperone with the church group, was sitting directly behind the bus driver and noticed the driver's condition. Mr. Taormina jzmped out of his seat, grabbed the steering wheel and applied the brak while guiding the bus to safety in the grassy area of a cloverleaf ramp at highways 44znd 212. Mr. Taormina and other chaperones on the bus then guided the children to safety out the bacleit of the bus . Mr. Taormina had the presence of mind to witness a dire emergency situation and react calmly and precisely in order to mitigate the situation. Had he not reacted as instinctually and quicly as he did, the bus could have easily crashed, causing a serious tragedy. Mr. Taormina's brave actions saved the lives of the passengers on the bus and the lives of the other drivers at that intersection. For his presence of mind, bravery and heroism, thereby award Timothy Taormina with the Eden Prairie Police Department's Commendation iiard. Lib IRlynolds Chief CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Proclamations & Presentations August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Jay Lotthammer, Director, Three Rivers Park District Presentation IV.B. Parks and Recreation Synopsis Cris Gears, Superintendent of Three Rivers Park District and Commissioner John Gibbs will present an overview of current Three Rivers Park District activities and the many amenities offered in and around Eden Prairie. Background Three Rivers Park District is a natural resources-based park system that manages nearly 27,000 acres of park reserves,regional parks,regional trails and special-use facilities. The Park District offers facilities for every season, including: picnicking, swimming, creative play,boating, fishing, downhill skiing, snowboarding, golf, camping and sledding; extensive trails for hiking,biking, in-line skating, horseback riding, cross-country skiing and snowshoeing, as well as program sites for nature,recreation, historic and farm education. Three Rivers Park District is an independent, special park district established by the State Legislature in 1957. As a special park district, Three Rivers Park District is charged with the responsibilities of acquisition, development and maintenance of large park reserves,regional parks and regional trails for the benefit and use of the citizens of suburban Hennepin County, Scott County,the metropolitan areas, and the State of Minnesota. The Park District works cooperatively with the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, Metropolitan Council and State Legislature as one of ten implementing agencies of the Metropolitan Regional Park System. This system of parks was established in 1974 by the Minnesota State Legislature and collectively serves more than 33 million park guests per year in the seven county metro area,providing outdoor education/recreation facilities, services and programs. The mission of Three Rivers Park District is to promote environmental stewardship through recreation and education in a natural resources-based park system. Each of the Park District's facilities is located within watersheds that flow into three rivers --the Mississippi,Minnesota and Crow. These rivers have historically been, and continue to be, significant in the lives of the region's residents. Three Rivers Park District's policy for planning and management of natural resources has distinguished it from other park and recreation agencies in Minnesota. The policy specifies that no more than 20 percent of a park reserve may be developed for active use, and that at least 80 percent of a park reserve shall be restored to and retained in a natural state. As a result,the Park District has been actively involved in the preservation and restoration of wildlife and plant species. Once rare osprey,bald eagles, sandhill cranes and trumpeter swans are now nesting in the park reserves. Woodland and prairie restorations have been accomplished using native wildflowers, shrubs and trees produced from seed collected in the park reserves. Park visitors are offered abundant opportunities to view and learn about the resources within each park. Careful routing of bike,hike and ski trails provides intimate views of woodlands,wetlands and prairie, as well as the wildlife that inhabit them. Outdoor education staff offer an array of programs that foster a better understanding of our environment. _ .,11•INE-imr&i ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Three Rivers Parks update Eden Prairie City Council , August 16, 2011 Visits to Reservervissrppi mElm Creek Park , P t ® 6\ Three Rive rs West Coon Rapids �■Crow-Hassan 5* ® Dam Regional Park �/ (Park Reserve m oito system Lake Rebecca Park Reserve 0�� m Fish LN J orth Mississippi �1 EagALakeRegi Regional Park ��• Park Regional Par w • Visits to Three �© Baker 55 Sifverwood Park Park Reserve •.E.French'•, 0 R ioraal2ark'j ! - ° 94 35�W� Rivers Parks have Noerenberjaiktrm Memorial '�, 0 Gardens Increased Gale Woods` MINNEAPOL`5 Farm �, Lake Minnetonka I10+0 35W I1 ' Regional Park 09 T B nt Lake o / �, tya substantially in h a ,_ / Glen cake Golf Re•copal Park ' / &Practice Center j ::. . _ 62 I Oa9a // Park Reserve _ recent years Hyland Lake Park Reserve ) e ---(461---rA011 -----j from 5 million ��� The Landing—, ,� Minnesota y& River Heritage Park I visits in 2005 to NORTH ® 0 LEGEND) Cleary Lake 0 HMurphy- nrehan m o re than 8 Regional Park '© PakRese Park District Properties Park Reserve — Park District Regional Trail System Regional Trail to be Developed 10 million last year State,Federal or other Regional Trails/Parks 4P• Park Entrance Bryant Lake Regional Park • Over the past 10 years, Brya nt ; Lake has shown one of the11 A. : largest increasesire �t a ��l �l in annual visits _ �_ ���; ak -. in the ark E -14 p • system • In 2001 , 138 , 100 visits were made • Last year, 421 , 600 peo p le visited Bryant Minnesota _ laik- - - 2� 4„a, 0 , ..., n River Bluffs m ) 394 n` am /51 . 494 169 w Pi LRT Regional 0V , ..4 m Trail1 - 4 L, 0__ ri• Met Council estimates r 6 m m that 295 , 700 visits ' 5 a.> • were made to the trail CARVER r I COUNTY m in 2010 0 0 • Use has increased i..-_ - substantially over the J ^v`. 'past decade ( 163 , 700 ‘7__`' 5-- , 1 visits in 2001 ) ),, _, 7.- ---r--F I Cross-country skiing at Glen Lake • More than 41 percent of the cross-country ,' _ skiers at Glen L Lake are from CROSS COUNTRY SKI TRAIL Eden Prairie 4 • Eden Prairie High School Nordic ski team trains at IP I Glen Lake Hyland - Bush -Anderson Lakes Park Reserve Smetana Ad, I pp • Regional Park 14 & ° Lake eke.� � m m°f e.aa v a e Golf ` "" �.Rd. I` w , s ° - W 0 soh L Bran Ad - Benton S >4 Reserve I {'/d�ice Cents 8 a t ese e s a � � • � �. yew 3 �.Vl t .�� �' Blvd¢s d0 At1, B2ttd t 10e, `r — 62 _i fc.oaemw, stcollaborative effort 'en°'OrBmdY y Ob rr�Bimh t.-na .I H L %: , _.a N. 411ka 'O�. w.3 ssm „ `q �I/ Swdyo s Vbw .0 Lak <r. , E Cornelia W. among Three n�%d_ -la w 70h 5 l 9 a. I 4 i m Roberta O R•: / , 1 ¢ ,@ 100 a View. Par L - •A: Blvy Dews Hill Rd. Llke Rivers, Cityof Eden �y 4 o d e �=1ina t Aid ,a. ;� ' W. LE` e I �� south Fo�' N t lnduetnsl w' 7/th SL '� N. 7BIh -t. © ' ...Drive N w7J. 7ad1n°lag 9' O �Eito St`� `, ..�.���r„_�p Bloomington See,„gas Rd. = e prfood w. c�' p � Orman�a'a ed 6 6 come y and•N"rt O Late Rock h La3.r• MBA �$� Y „ Mna' e eP Lake 4ndarean 4,4... ® a W. yaks PA eiar' Slam Qe.$ Bush ` le �wi Lake S ti e e 's Qp i w.94th m ; St. '1 a ; . a p�,a`A Flying ay Clod E O a 8 a 4 Airport x r F it, m evlanc = € ftyin0 r°� _ ¢ -\.lki• _ w.1091d SL Ak >, m HylandAush- m Anderson Lakes # YGrass 41iq Alcor 69 " Park Reserve �,°0,° n(asOtd B` oia Shakopee Rd. -�ti- --� ¢O W.110th St Anderson Lakes drawdown • Northwest and Southwest Anderson Lakes were drawn down in 2008 to kill curly- leaf pondweed • Northwest Anderson Lake is showing great success — water quality and water clarity are much improved • Southwest Anderson Lake still shows high phosphorus levels, which can lead to algae blooms Hyland play a rea • Expansion project , , :c, 1.�:'1 r F i 'µ. . '. 6.,.. is underwayat 1' y!1 P• 9 o, iF.yrj' fit to 'tr... K! fie,,r, - _: Y - 1=,-'ba f{5r�y.. .ir r L J. N..9� Hyland play area Y. ... r.- 4 4 ., •��'g r A b �.. yt'4! � SY"1 $44:-;gip" �e �"'N' • 4-,§kiii:1 1 ii 1 47 o _ ,_.__ • Play area is open EBI p during , ran y construction ; ;- _,; � � , ° L + new project is f ,,. f1sh ` 2 !I '�� '�11�i1 I' � �'4�1'��1 rl`+ ,qll I o, �• ",y expected to be „,;<,,„ y ,l,m- ,� _ . w trffffil 1. b,1 ,1 r111 s, T r r trrr�rW 1 finished by next �� ,, rrrrf „ �_ 4 �� �iq!�r 0 .:.,'{ ktrrrirrrfli'rFrrr r11 I� I 11 y .1 1 -lrrl„ sill rill) Irlill summer �i�,�s, .,E1�1 ,.' r� �r`FI.. �I ,,,,,r Mm Hyland play area expansion • When completed , play area will 111 be 75 percent qi � larger ; 1 • Addition will Or a4� i include 2 ' '" `' IIII ; large towers, 4ri4II 4iikh. 7 slides, a large net structure, and 4 climbing walls Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area plan cam us p • Three Rivers is taking a comprehensive look at HSSA campus and p �� the potential , for future improvements � °: _ T -m ar`` - ` 4ieffir • Goal is to make N = `- �� ;�, HSSA a vibrant, _- - 4 year- round -_ . -_-- --_ -� � _'= destination Dakota Rail Regional Trail • Pedestrian/ trail _ , bridges are open ` '�� `�' over Hwy. 7 and .- ‘ ��, ..., • • - County Road 92 in ' � 1 St . Bonifacius "�� kjd ' • Bridges connect ?�*NEE411 - ilV44%r;oi, Three Rivers' 13 . 5 .. f� '' . . " � miles of trail with 7 ""' -- or � .... It. ---=— = . • miles of trail Carver „,.} 1 County completed this spring Vision Plan __......- Through leadership, ThreeRivers advocacy, PARK DISTRICT innovation and action, Three Rivers is a model of a Vision Plansustainable regional I IULY2010 system of parks and LEADERSHIP • ADVOCACY • INNOVATION • ACTION trails that meets the needs of the present while ensuring that _ ____ —__ _______________ the needs of future _�� _ _,_ _ generations are „/„.. _„. _ ,____________ -___________ _ , - , - __ - well-met. ��_ ---� _� - - - �-- �, _. L Protect the region 's water and natural resources Inspire peop ! e to recreate r a . AI Alp ' ;i Sir T� �- 0.11, .K idlil i lir 0 :!4 ZV------." ----- . , , , i i \ • r , , .1.; .4 A • 41. 1 j P. • T 1 V',/,r';1 rk d A.! 1,t.r, ' , - {' r•L k ' - ' •4l •1 7 ,. .,- -4•; IP - *'-". c-•• . .4/ E•.•;:c. 1 '''' — • . •.•'., . . i ; ••••••1, •-:- •-, • • •.• . .:' -. ...' '. • -..,...,' . --V .- • • . '. . l•.-_ .l'..' ..',. . ' ' C onnect .... ., 4 i . . .. , ,... ... . . . ..• .- ;' [.• . . , . . . . , ..:..• ..IfipL .,' i . . , .‘„. people to .. s .h.-. 7 • • • . _ • , _,. . ,. e•..• . nature ...ici.v.--,..0,. ...14 ,0/41 .,.. • ..-7-... . .. • .'13P.I 4 • - ' .A.r!,... .,.., . f .::::•% .' • •4.. 0 • . • • . . -. . . ' 41. • . . S * ,- •' „, „..,-- -...;., --.+4'.-,-...:-.... L. -. . ...^-. - - -:• :• .. .. _ . • f "".‘:4-%•:,0:..'.. - • • . : . 4,,, ' , .,',..!' ,..;'N. •‘... , ,!,',' .-,,:,,* : .- • •• •- _ r ,• ,, `,•'.i.- ',414. r, • •• ..,,,.0. - 4 d , • . . . Nir "! . .. ,;',. •7 :.At . , , • if-. . •• • - •.) • 1,. • , ...•. . 111, ' \ -4.: '' i.i .,,,,,, .- • A P AINI '' .-c..--h.- . ' ,•--,, -,.._: ,,,,;,-.;,*1,-, ,,,., : Iv , . ., . . - • .. I'. ' =, -' 1 —••----*.It %,*:if -I"le .• _., -5,+•• .. . L 4,• 10.. Jor ..•__ ,. . (10.1., , ...,-;; ii4k1,.; 1.11•141 , . 14.• 11111's . . s., ..,.14.,.4'' • .•-•-• 4 - ' ''., f ' . talt . Jr ' _-__, 0, , .4, 8 .1, il• r it;..4 .41 t• ...7.,.. .,...,,,,),. ,. ..,,.a „ , ,I,.1. t 1,.... -.--,' il'' • . ; 0 114 i fli- , . ... , ,, .4. • .• ,, .3 .i.V IA 4144.'4: N , : '-efi ' • . iiik-' . • ;„ -• : • 7,44-Itt . ..1.- : ••••,.3 tr — 'ir 4 • - • YE . . 11111.1.11- I. --1112. IlMMl.".IaI . . Create vibrant mcv-.....- '41 if.t ....„, 41.r... '' "r..‘it44,.., places , -,., , -, _ ....,. . ,A , ... ....,. .„...1...i..:_ :., . . ....4 / t. . . . ... . ,„: :.... ot ,.. . __ ,. .. . . ..f- .. ,...iiii. ,„, i { .• -', 'A ,,,, '. :Pc'.' ,..,,_ .# %., ••`?.• - . - ' •r.'.- lir *" ^ • ,..> „-, i• ,..-..." *-.1,, *" . . , , , . . .;•• :(1 ...,'. ',t,1 . •4 '' ' .: . '-14 I g". .•:-'•- ' 1 ."!'":':7..r'-'-‘;. - ,.*,:f.i,'Z,.' ' ir ' ..., ,,•. ' '" '' • '.:''.• • ' - - v• ..*".-. • .. . " • ,`",,;; t..;...‘ ''- 1",.c't,..,,.,., . .4 ' - .r -, . - ..-. . - ... .--- ' . . '. 4.1- i. ' ,- i. . - . ', r:. .... . A-• ,. . _ .? 11 : ,• -, . - . •. , , ' • • : ---.- 1 P ir 4,4 1 ,--. _ 1 . ' - : +,! ' i. 1... '.,' 0, 0 t . 1 1 • ,- - ,. ' !It. .. o 1 r if,LHiv, t" ,,- -t.• At.. : 101 1 , it i . ,, .,; . . .. . ,- . ,...- --0 .. . 1. li ie. 1 4 -. , ''). / 4 Pi r - , - r-..,,,.0 :.:._ _. - r , ., - - Illit---,-- , 1 4.. (JIP/ : ii .7.• „ , _ aisi. .--, ' , o ' A ..,,,,_ . 0 2 • , milm.- , ., . • .. • .... ( • .• • . . . . ..• ' . ..- ._ 1 cr- /, . • , . • ir . .. sEA•/' . •. .. , . - - - • .• . .11.1..11"11111111111111111111.1111111111Mill1111.— Collaborate across boundaries _..........„ ... ,...1c. , . .. ... . .,, SkL;.11 t _Jr• Mill _ 1hme i '.rs4141111 / ) i- I, ia It, I sM "_ qi. :.., € ifip,i ii1 , tl: f , Y. "• 1. 31 .iir Three Rivers- Scott County Or • JointpowersJannem- a 1.4.4 . F r , : CIPir 10-1: reement to 9 di: 01 .LLB +i 7� 44 4 .+,• ■ ti ` ir collaborate on �* ': E regional park •�•_4F. 1 i ,f 1. k and trail r4011 services for Scott County residents r' Cedar Lake Farm Regional Park ThreeRivers Se4U PARK DISTRICT County o Cleary Lake o Spring Lake Regional Park Regional Park o Murphy- Hanrehan o Doyle- Kennefick Park Reserve Regional Park o The Landing - o Cedar Lake Farm Minnesota River Regional Park Heritage Park o Scott West Regional Trail Partnering to collectively operate all regional parks and trails in Scott County Are there ways we can collaborate witho u to y increase services for Eden . . Prairie residents ? s.+, -i' - . $}+.P, Si.4. -4 -...,. -. .' r. - -. " � ti ,c *a. -., 4; ' .: x r 9 w "5i: a . - - - •, - _ l� ThreeRivers PARK DISTRICT Questions and comments? ITEM NO.: VI. A. UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP & OPEN PODIUM TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2011 CITY CENTER 5:00—6:25 PM, HERITAGE ROOM II 6:30—7:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBER CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Kathy Nelson, and Ron Case CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Rob Reynolds, Fire Chief George Esbensen, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, Communications Manager Joyce Lorenz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Recorder Lorene McWaters FIRE DUTY CREW Chief Esbensen presented a PowerPoint on the proposed duty crew initiative. He said the duty crew model of staffing is designed to improve on-scene arrival time. Under this model, fire fighters would work scheduled"shifts" at each fire station. Two fire fighters would be on duty at each fire station, for a total of eight fire fighters on staff at all times. Esbensen said that shifts are generally short(from three to six hours) to allow for maximum flexibility. For larger events, a general alarm would still go out to the on-call fire fighter population. Esbensen said the switch to duty crew is estimated to result in the ability to arrive on- scene four minutes faster. Esbensen said these four minutes are crucial in containing fires and providing assistance in personal injury/medical incidents. In addition to improved response times, implementation of the duty crew would help improve recruitment and retention of fire fighters due to fewer unscheduled responses. Esbensen said a number of surrounding suburbs have converted to duty crew, including Plymouth, Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Minnetonka, Hopkins, Roseville and Eagan. All have indicated they are pleased with the results of the conversion. Esbensen said the cost of implementing the duty crew for the second half of 2012 would be about$140,000. The cost for the first full year of duty crew,proposed for 2013, would be about $260,000. Council Member Aho asked about the source of the additional costs. Esbensen said each fire fighter would be paid$10 per hour for each scheduled shift. Esbensen said there would be no change to the current fire pension program and staffing would remain at the current level. Council Member Case asked how Eden Prairie's response times compare to neighboring communities. Esbensen said it is difficult to compare response times because Eden Prairie covers a much larger geographic area than many of our neighboring communities. Mayor Tyra-Lukens asked if switching to duty crew would require remodeling of the fire stations. Esbensen no changes to the fire stations would be needed. Mayor Tyra-Lukens said it seems as if the cost benefit ratio is good. She noted that during the last election, City Council Workshop Minutes July 19, 2011 Page 2 all City Council candidates indicated they are in favor of the duty crew; however, she does not sense a surge in demand from the community. She said the question is whether or not we need the duty crew right away, or can it be pushed out a year. Nelson said she has heard from residents who say longer response times worry them. She said she wishes the City had gone to the duty crew a couple of years ago. Council Member Butcher said the return on investment would be worth it. II. OPEN PODIUM A. KARTHIK RAMANATHAN—COMMUNITY CENTER TRESPASS NOTICE Karthik Ramanathan, 18213 Warbler Lane, said he was concerned about a trespass notice he received from the Eden Prairie Community Center involving an allegation that he had made a woman uncomfortable. He said no specifics were given for the violation, and he said he did not receive his right of appeal. He presented a petition to the City Manager. B. JEFF STRATE—BIRCH ISLAND WOODS PARKING LOT Jeff Strate, 15021 Summerhill Drive, said he is leading an initiative to get the City and the Watershed District to rethink the proposed parking lot at Birch Island Woods. He said there are better ways to get people to see the woods, such as directional signs and improvements to Indian Chief Road. He was also concerned the agreement for pervious paving maintenance goes for only ten years. He also said there should be additional soil testing for contaminants. C. DOUG LIND—BIRCH ISLAND WOODS PARKING LOT Doug Lind, 15808 North Eden Drive, said a paving area in a conservation area is contradictory, and there has never been a contentious parking situation in this area. He questioned the need for the parking lot and thought it was a violation of the spirit of a conservation area. D. GERI NAPUCK—BIRCH ISLAND WOODS PARKING LOT Geri Napuck, 6447 Kurtz Lane, commented on behalf of the Friends of Birch Island Woods Board of Directors noting the City's vision for the woods has always been for safe public access for residents including handicapped access. She said the 2002 Task Force and the project consultant unanimously recommended installation of an eight stall parking lot. The issues raised in opposition to the parking lot have been addressed diligently by City staff, and the Watershed District has approved a $25,000 grant for the pervious pavement. E. MARCUS JOHNSON—BIRCH ISLAND WOODS PARKING LOT Marcus Johnson, 7017 Kingston Drive, said he was a member of the Board of Friends of the Birch Island Woods. While he agreed it would be nice to not have City Council Workshop Minutes July 19, 2011 Page 3 cars in a conservation area, many people do find their way to the conservation area by car and the parking lot provides a better and safer access to Birch Island Woods. F. JOHN JUSTEN—BIRCH ISLAND WOODS PARKING LOT John Justen, 6558 Kurtz Lane, said he recently became a member of Friends of the Birch Island Woods and he stands behind the proposed parking lot. Regarding the concerns about maintenance of the pervious pavement, he said the surface will be panels that can be easily replaced. Tyra-Lukens said the parking lot was approved by the City Council last fall, and there is no public hearing for this on the agenda tonight. III. ADJOURNMENT ITEM NO.: VI. B. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,JULY 19, 2011 7:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Ron Case, and Kathy Nelson CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Public Works Director Robert Ellis, City Engineer Rod Rue, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, City Attorney Ric Rosow and Council Recorder Jan Curielli I. ROLL CALL/CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. COLOR GUARD /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. OPEN PODIUM INVITATION IV. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS A. VETERANS MEMORIAL TASK FORCE RECOGNITION Lotthammer said the Veterans Memorial is a treasure in our City as well as a tribute to the 17-member Veterans Memorial Task Force appointed in 2006. He read the names of the Task Force members. He noted the Task Force has accomplished their goal of constructing the memorial, and there is an interest to continue the annual celebration on Memorial Day. He said the action requested tonight is to authorize staff to reserve Purgatory Creek on Memorial Day at no charge so the Task Force can conduct a ceremony on that day. The item also recognizes the accomplishments of the Task Force and provides for the care and maintenance of the memorial. The remaining funds raised by the veterans will be used to complete the installation of flags at the memorial. Additional donations received would be used to fund the care and maintenance of the memorial. He said the Communications Department will work with those who want to have an inscription at the memorial and will administer future memorial funds. Kevin Rofidal, Chair of the Veterans Memorial Committee, reviewed the Task Force activities and team efforts and thanked the City for their support. He read a list of those Eden Prairie residents who have died in service. Tyra-Lukens thanked the committee members for their work. MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Case, to recognize the members of the Veterans Memorial Task Force for their significant accomplishments; to authorize staff to create a care and maintenance fund to CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 2 account for donations and expenditures towards the ongoing maintenance of the Veterans Memorial; and to authorize staff to reserve at no cost, Purgatory Creek Park for a Memorial Day celebration. Motion carried 5-0. Tyra-Lukens introduced our new Public Works Director, Robert Ellis. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Getschow added Items VIII.G. and XIV.C.1. He noted there were revisions to Item IX.C. and D. on goldenrod paper. MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Case, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. VI. MINUTES A. COUNCIL WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY,JUNE 14, 2011 MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to approve the minutes of the City Council workshop held Tuesday, June 14, 2011, as published. Motion carried 5-0. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY,JUNE 14, 2011 MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Aho, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, June 14, 2011, as published. Motion carried 5-0. VII. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (DEED) FOR BUSINESS DEVERLOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT C. AWARD CONTRACT FOR BUILDING RESTORATION REPAIRS (CAULKING, TUCKPOINTING, SEALANTS, BLOCK& BRICK REPAIR, CONCRETE, ETC.) TO RESTORATION SYSTEMS, INC. D APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR THE VALLEY VIEW ROAD/PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE INTERSECTION SERVICES CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 3 E. APPROVE EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD (CR4) FLASHING YELLOW ARROW CONVERSION PROJECT F. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CHEROKEE TRAIL UTILITY RELOCATION PROJECT TO G.F. JEDLICKI,INC. G. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FOR UNITEDHEALTH GROUP DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve Items A-G on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22,HENNEPIN COUNTY(Resolution No. 2011-53) Getschow said official notice of this public hearing was published in the June 30, 2011,Eden Prairie News and sent to one property owner. He said this is essentially a swapping of easements. The City has no need for the roadway easement if we have the drainage easement. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Aho, to close the public hearing and to adopt Resolution No. 2011-53 vacating an easement for road purposes in the southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Motion carried 5-0. B. GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE by Marsh Cove, LLC. Request for Guide Plan change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres and from Church to Parks and Open Space on 5.21 acres, Planned Unit Development concept review on 11.62 acres, Planned Unit District review and Zoning District change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres, Preliminary Plat on 11.62 acres into 16 lots and 1 outlot. Location: 17850 Duck Lake Trail. (Resolution for Guide Plan Change; Resolution for PUD concept Review; Ordinance for PUD district Review and Zoning District Change; Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Getschow said official notice of this public hearing was published in the July 7, 2011, Eden Prairie News and sent to 87 property owners. He said this is a 16-lot, single- family residential project. The project requires a Guide Plan change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.21 acres. The project requires 40 Planned Unit Development waivers from the City code related to lot size, lot width, street frontage, setbacks, and cul-de-sac length. He said the June 10, 2011, staff report to the Planning Commission recommended that the project be continued with direction to revise the plan to conform to City Code CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 4 requirements. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project as submitted with the change in the guide plan and the 40 waivers from the City Code related to lot size, lot width, street frontage, setbacks, and cul-de-sac length. Jeff Schoenwetter, representing JMS Custom Homes design team, addressed the proposal. He said the request for variance for the PUD enables them to do some things that are not feasible under the R1-13.5 zoning. He said the Edenbrook Conservation Area to the north of the project will grow by three acres, and it dedicates 27% of the land area as an addition to Edenbrook. He said all the lots are within 10% of the R1-13.5 size. The cul-de-sac was shortened and flexibility was added to the plan design to create view corridors. The homes built will adhere to GreenPath building science. Aho asked about the intended value of the homes. Mr. Schoenwetter said they anticipate the price to be around $600,000 for the home and lot. Rick Harrison, Rick Harrison Site Design,presented a video of the site design. He said the building pads are very large because they are shaped for the lot. He reviewed the design concepts for the houses. Nelson asked if there is any point on the side yard setbacks that has less than ten feet between the house and lot line. Mr. Harrison said there is not. Nelson said she thought there were a couple of lots with 20 foot back yard setbacks. Mr. Harrison said the minimum backyard setback is 32 feet. Nelson said we have approved tight properties before and then ten years down the road we have issues. It is always a difficult situation when a house is built so close to the backyard setback and they want to add a deck or do other things with the property later. She asked about the slope on Lot 8. The project engineer said the slopes are 5 to 1 at the steepest. Nelson asked if the development will not have any street lighting. The project engineer said that was true. Nelson said she was concerned there could be dark spots if people don't change their light bulbs so she was not sure she was comfortable with not having street lights. Mr. Schoenwetter said he envisioned the Homeowners Association would have by-laws and covenants that would require photo-cell illumination. In addition they could incorporate the maintenance of those as a requirement of the Homeowners Association. Aho noted they have incorporated a lot of nice design features into the project and asked if they have always worked with 16 lots rather than a smaller number. Mr. Schoenwetter said the original plan was for 21 lots,but staff encouraged them to come forward with a plat density that resembled the ordinance. Getschow said between the Planning Commission meeting and this meeting staff did some research on some of their design features which are part of the concept called "Prefurbia." Getschow asked if this would be one of the smaller sites where they CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 5 propose some of these ideas. Mr. Harrison said they used some of the design elements from "Prefurbia,"but the site is restricted for some of those elements. Sarah Cheesman, 6782 Boyd Avenue,presented a petition from the neighborhood asking the City Council to reject the proposal with 40 waivers. She said they love the view they have now, and this development would alter the view for her and many others in the neighborhood. She said the City has zoning ordinances for a specific reason and asked the Council to deny the request because it does not fit within the existing neighborhood and does not meet City guidelines. She thought it would set a precedent for other neighborhoods. Shawn Cheesman, 6782 Boyd Avenue, presented a PowerPoint presentation showing photos of the neighborhood and reviewing the technicalities of non-conformance by this development. He was concerned that too many of the large evergreens around the property will have to be removed for this development. He said over 59 people he talked to in the neighborhood support the zoning change to be single family homes, but they want the developer to prepare a plan that meets City guidelines. Mr. Schoenwetter said they held neighborhood meetings at the church with a large turnout, yet they never heard about these concerns until coming to this meeting. He said they are dedicating nearly 30% of the site to the City, and the design is innovative and very buildable. He said they can go to a conventional grid, but that would not be the best way to develop the property. Ryan Richards, 6758 Boyd Avenue, said part of the parkland being given to the City is underwater for three months of the year and really isn't buildable. There also would be no access for people outside of the neighborhood. MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Nelson said she has questions about every lot needing a waiver. She noted the City did some different back and side yard setbacks when Hennepin Village was developed as a PUD; however, this development is a small infill piece. She was concerned about how the land slopes down at the end of the property. She liked the fact they are doing some innovative things, but 16 lots on this seems a little tight. She would like to send it back to staff and say we approve the use of the new technology but it needs some work. Butcher Wickstrom thought this Council has an appetite for seeing new plans for development. She thought there were some excellent ideas in the plan including the curving street and the pervious surfaces. She knew we have had work done in the City by Mr. Schoenwetter; however, she was worried because we have concerned neighbors. She has talked to staff and reviewed the minutes, and she has concerns about the large number of waivers requested. She was also concerned about the lack of communication when we have developments going into existing neighborhoods. She hoped that we would have greater communication going forward and would like to have staff take another look at this. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 6 Case asked what the timetable is for approval. Jeremiah replied we have until September 2 before we would have to ask them for an extension. Case said he would prefer to not vote this up or down tonight because there is a lot of good in this project. He liked the gifting of 27% as well as what he heard about the new neighborhood design. He thought our zoning rules are there to protect people that live there and to protect precedent for new development. While there may be only six variance categories, it impacts homes in 40 different ways and that is not insignificant. We have done variances in large PUD's before, but the City gained something in those. He thought 40 waivers is precedent setting, and he would like to see this design with 14 or 15 lots. We need to look at how infill projects impact the neighbors and try to get the best project for the people of Eden Prairie. He has walked the area, and it was clear several of the lots have no screening. He thought it was incumbent on the developer to make sure the people who are already there are treated well and the lots are screened. Aho said he walked the property and looked at the lots. He agreed the design features of the project are significant and beautiful; however he was uncomfortable with the amount of waivers requested for the project. He thought the design features could be retained with a lesser number of lots. He thought we should try to match the look and feel of the neighborhood in terms of lot size and space. This design feels tighter than the two streets on either side and he would like to see another plan come forward that would require few or no waivers. Tyra-Lukens thought it is a beautiful plan and she liked the way the street will look. She liked the rainwater gardens, the pavers and other features, but she had the same issues as the other Council Members about the number of variances. She would also like to see this go back for more work. Case thought if there were waivers that accomplished some of the other objectives; he thought we would be willing to look at individual situations. MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to continue the project to the August 16th City Council meeting and to urge staff to meet with the developer to see what can be done to make many fewer variances on the project while retaining the innovative ideas. Motion carried 5-0. Tyra-Lukens said she would also like to encourage more communications between the neighborhoods. C. METROPOLITAN FORD CAR DEALERSHIP by Thomas Grossman Family L.P. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres, Planned Unit District Review on and Zoning District Amendment in the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 16.2 acres, Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres, Preliminary Plat on 16.2 acres into two lots. Location: 12475 Plaza Drive. (Resolution No. 2011-54 for PUD Concept Review; Ordinance for PUB District Review and Zoning District Amendment; Resolution No. 2011-55 for Preliminary Plat) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 7 Getschow said official notice of this public hearing was published in the July 7, 2011, Eden Prairie News and sent to 16 property owners. This project deals with both the Suburban Chevrolet and Metropolitan Ford dealerships. Steve Irwin, project architect, said they were available to answer questions. Nelson asked what will be done with the current Metropolitan Ford site. Tom Grossman said he is the owner of the two dealerships but he has no idea what the current owners' plans are for the site. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to close the public hearing; to adopt Resolution No. 2011-54 for Planned Unit Development concept review on 16.2 acres; to approve 1st Reading of the ordinance for Planned Unit Development district review with waivers, and Zoning District amendment in the C- Reg-Ser District on 16.2 acres; to adopt Resolution No. 2011-55 for preliminary plat on 16.2 acres into 2 lots; to direct staff to prepare a development agreement incorporating staff and commission recommendations and Council conditions; to approve and authorize issuance of a grading permit for the Metropolitan Ford 2011 project subject to release by the City Engineer upon determination that the final contract documents conform to plans stamp dated July 12, 2011, as approved by the City Council; and to approve and authorize issuance of a footing and foundation permit for the Metropolitan Ford project subject to release by the Chief Building Official that the building permit conforms to plans stamp dated July 12, 2011, as approved by the City Council. Motion carried 5-0. D. UNITED HEALTH GROUP GUIDE PLAN CHANGE by United Health Group. Request for Guide Plan change from High Density Residential to Office on 19 acres and Neighborhood Commercial to Office on 4.5 acres and Regional Commercial to Office on 4.2 acres. Location: Hwy 62 and Shady Oak Road. (Resolution No. 2011- 56 for Guide Plan Change) Getschow said this Guide Plan change is the first step in a large project. United Health Group (UHG) is proposing a 1,497,000 square foot office complex. He noted this is the first of several meetings for this project. There are a number of components to traffic and upgrades to different areas of the City that are part of a previous developer agreement that we are updating as part of this process. Dennis Spalla, Senior Director of Development at UHG, said their request tonight is to change the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan from mixed use to all office use on the site. If the request is approved, they will return to review the entire PUD. Their long term vision is a three-phase project consisting of four buildings with two to be completed in the first phase. The office buildings will have office capacity for over 6600 workers. The Southwest Transit LRT is a key ingredient of their plan because this site is envisioned as a major employment destination. There were no comments from the audience. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 8 MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Aho, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Nelson said she wanted to make sure the LRT station does stay a part of the campus. Mr. Spalla said it will be a part of the plan but they don't know exactly what the design will be. Nelson said she wanted to be sure there are plans for people-type amenities within the project. Mr. Spalla said their buildings will have amenities within them. They have adaptive workplace standards for their buildings and will try to spread traffic out from the peak hours. There will be a convenience store near the cafeterias, and they will also have a wellness center that is like a Minute Clinic. Tyra-Lukens asked if they have talked to any of the planning staff for the LRT in order to discuss parking opportunities around the station. Mr. Spalla said he is on the Community Advisory Council for the LRT so he has talked to their staff over the past two years and is very familiar with the plan, the process, the route, and the functions and capabilities of each of the stations. They have gone through some of the planning process with consultants for the LRT to work on a designated area for the station and the parking ramp. Getschow thought the timing for the development works out well with the LRT. Jeremiah said the contract for professional services with SRF approved earlier on tonight's Consent Calendar involves SRF looking at integration of the LRT station into the UHG plans. She said staff will do the best they can to make sure there is adequate space. Case said we are extremely excited to have UHG come in and he liked the basic plan. He was impressed by the incredible respect they are showing for the environment and the wetlands. Aho welcomed the UHG group and noted this is a great project. He asked about the project timing. Mr. Spalla said they would like to accelerate the schedule and would like to be in the ground yet this year. MOTION: Butcher Wickstrom moved, seconded by Nelson, to adopt Resolution No. 2011-56 for Guide Plan change from High Density Residential to Office on 19 acres;Neighborhood Commercial to Office on 4.5 acres; and Regional Commercial to Office on 4.2 acres, and to direct staff to prepare a development agreement incorporating staff and commission recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. X. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Case, to approve the payment of claims as submitted. Motion was approved on a roll call vote,with Aho,Butcher Wickstrom, Case,Nelson, and Tyra-Lukens voting "aye." CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 9 XI. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. APPROVE 1s'READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTE 10 RELATING TO ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Getschow said in June there were several issues discussed regarding the State shutdown, and one of the discussions was about electrical inspections. Even though it looks like the shutdown may come to an end soon, staff would like to move ahead with setting up our own inspections until the State can take over the program. The ordinance is set up so that it will automatically sunset when the State takes over. Tyra-Lukens asked if we could set up the ordinance so it can go back into effect next year if there is another State shutdown. Rosow said that could be done but he would not want to draft the language for that on the spot. He said we could revisit it in a more thoughtful manner after the shutdown is over. He noted the ordinance states this will sunset at the point when the Department of Labor and Industry is funded. He thought the intent was that it be revoked once the Department of Labor and Industry is prepared to initiate electrical inspections in the City of Eden Prairie. Getschow agreed that would be our intent. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Nelson, to approve 1st reading of an ordinance amending City Code Chapter 10 relating to electrical inspections, with the wording regarding the sunset provision as stated by City Attorney Rosow. Motion carried 5- 0. B. APPROVE 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE 9-2011 AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 10 RELATING TO ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2011-57 APPROVING SUMMARY ORDINANCE Getschow noted 2nd reading would normally occur at a subsequent meeting so this action will require a unanimous vote of the Council. MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Case, to approve 2nd reading of Ordinance No. 9-2011 amending City Code Chapter 10 relating to electrical inspections and adopt Resolution No. 2011-57 approving summary ordinance. Motion carried 5-0. C. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2011-58 RECEIVING AND ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORT, RECEIVING AND APPROVING 100% PETITION, AND ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FOR TRAIL ADJACENT TO BEARPATH GOLF ND COUNTRY CLUB Getschow said both of these items are related to a development agreement with Bearpath Golf and Country Club that goes back to 1993 regarding the construction of a trail along the westerly line of Bearpath. He said we have come to an agreement with Bearpath for the trail. There is a change in the amount of the assessment for these two items on goldenrod paper. There is only one property being assessed, and CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 10 they agree with the assessment so there is no public hearing on this item. Item D is the actual levy of the assessment. Rosow pointed out there are three goldenrod items including Exhibit A which is an attachment for both resolutions. MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 2011-58 receiving and accepting the feasibility report, receiving and approving the 100%petition, ordering improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for public improvement for trail adjacent to Bearpath Golf and Country Club. Motion carried 5-0. D. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2011-59 APPROVING AND LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PROPERTY OWNED BY BEARPATH GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS IDENTIFIED IN THE RESOLUTION MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution No. 2011-59 approving and levying special assessments against property owned by Bearpath Golf and Country Club Limited Partnership as identified in the resolution. Motion carried 5-0. XII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS XIII. APPOINTMENTS XIV. REPORTS A. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS A. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1. Smith Douglas More Property Jeremiah said staff is working with the Riley Watershed District on a grant to help fund a parking lot expansion at the Smith Douglas More property using porous pavers. She said if we receive the grant, it would require matching funds from the City. Staff will suggest using the storm water utility fund to provide the matching funds. Tyra-Lukens commented it is obvious they need the additional parking. D. REPORT OF PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR E. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 19,2011 Page 11 1. Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Request for Quotes for East Staring Lane Watermain Extension City Engineer Rod Rue said this is an item that relates to the vacation of roadway easement approved earlier tonight. It is contingent upon the property owner granting us the water easement. Staff is asking the Council to approve the plans and specifications drafted in-house and to authorize a request for quotes for the work. The estimated cost is about $30,000 and would be financed with the water utility capital fund. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Aho, to approve plans and specifications and order request for quotes for I.C. 11-5796, East Staring Lane watermain extension project. Motion carried 5-0. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2011-60 Awarding Construction Contract for Valley View Road/Prairie Center Drive Intersection Improvements City Engineer Rod Rue said sealed bids were taken for this project last Thursday. The item would have been on the Consent Calendar but because of the State shutdown and some issues with testing that MnDOT would normally have done, the City Attorney advised we have language in the contract to limit our liability for claims against the State shutdown. Rosow said they added the item to give a little clarification that there will be no ramification for delay damages attributable to the shutdown. MOTION: Aho moved, seconded by Butcher Wickstrom, to adopt Resolution No. 2011-60 awarding construction contract for I.C. 10-5782 (Valley View Road/Prairie Center Drive intersection improvement project) to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Motion carried 5-0. F. REPORT OF POLICE CHIEF G. REPORT OF FIRE CHIEF H. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XV. OTHER BUSINESS XVII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Nelson moved, seconded by Case, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5- 0. Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 9:12 PM. ITEM NO.: VI. C. UNAPPROVED MINUTES JOINT CITY COUNCIL/BUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 2011 COMMUNITY CENTER 6:00 PM, CAMBRIA ROOM CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Council Members Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher Wickstrom, Ron Case and Kathy Nelson BUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION: Annette Agner, Eapen Chacko, Dan Funk, Rick King (Chair), Michael Morris, Jon Muilenburg(Vice Chair), Chris Nylander, Sue Kotchevar(Staff Liaison) CITY STAFF: City Manager Rick Getschow, Police Chief Rob Reynolds, Fire Chief George Esbensen, Public Works Director Eugene Dietz, Community Development Director Janet Jeremiah, Parks and Recreation Director Jay Lotthammer, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Recorder Jan Curielli I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Tyra-Lukens called the meeting to order at 6:10 PM. Council Member Aho was absent. Commission Member Agner was absent. II. EDUCATIONAL SESSION ON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING City Manager Getschow said tonight the Council and the Budget Advisory Commission (BAC) will receive a presentation on capital planning and capital budgeting to prepare for the joint work session next week. Terri Heaton, Senior Vice President of Springsted, Inc., said the goal for tonight's presentation is to give a general overview of capital finance and to talk about specific items that will be useful to the City of Eden Prairie as we move forward. She noted Springsted provides advice on public finance, operational finance, economic development, human resources and organizational management, and investment service. Ms Heaton reviewed capital financing principles and guidelines and said tonight's focus will be on capital maintenance areas. She said long term financial planning is needed to establish a fixed asset replacement policy and to prioritize maintenance of the existing capital assets. She said the City is currently using a"Pay-As-You-Go" (PAYGO)program to pay for capital expenditures; however, because of the increasing amount needed over the years,primarily for pavement management, the current reserves will not be sufficient to cover all of the projected expenses. She reviewed the techniques available to add revenue under the PAYGO program and explained some of the options that use a combination of PAYGO and bonding. She said a balancing act is needed to undertake capital projects at the most efficient time while having the least impact on the community from the added cost. JOINT CITY COUNCILBUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES April 28,2011 Page 2 Ms Heaton explained the basics of municipal bonds and the different types of bonds available, including General Obligation(GO)bonds, Revenue bonds, GO Revenue bonds and Annual Appropriation bonds. She said GO bonds have the lowest interest rates, and the GO Revenue bonds are often used to pay for utilities. Two types of GO bonds are used for roads and streets: GO Improvement bonds, where 20% or more of the project is specially assessed; and GO Reconstruction bonds, where less than 20% is specially assessed but which require a five-year plan to be unanimously adopted by City Council Members at a public hearing. She said the GO Improvement bonds are often used for street construction, but Eden Prairie is at the point where the GO Reconstruction bonds would be helpful. She said Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)bonds can be used for essential City facilities. Those bonds require majority approval of a five-year CIP and bonding for specific items at a public hearing. Kotchevar noted we used CIP bonds to build the last two fire stations. King asked if we currently have any General Obligation(GO) Reconstruction bonds. Kotchevar said we do not. Dietz said we haven't had to reconstruct any streets yet. Ms Heaton reviewed financing options including funding sources used by other cities to finance roads, streets and facilities. She said a special service district can be used for pockets of the community with higher levels of use. Case asked if the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) tax-exempt property fees would be something to use for churches and other tax-exempt properties. Heaton said the fees could be used for anyone who is using services such as street snow plowing but who is not paying taxes. Case asked if the School District pays rent for their use of City Hall. Kotchevar said they don't at this time, and we would have to work with them in order to start charging them. Case said he would be interested in looking into that more. Nelson asked if a neighborhood group could ask to become a special services district. Heaton said it would be necessary to get a majority to petition for the request; however, she advised being very cautious about such situations. Rosow said some development agreements have that process built in; for example, Windsor Plaza is guided to do that. Heaton said the services would have to be over and above what the rest of the community receives. Butcher Wickstrom asked if there is a funding source for green buildings or other innovative construction. Heaton said the legislature approved the ability to enter into contracts that would be based on measuring the savings obtained by the innovations. Kotchevar said we did the financing of the 20-40-15 program that way. Heaton said there are other programs or grants that can be applied for, but the funding for those is running out. Heaton said franchise fees are a surcharge on the amount of users' gas and electric bills. These are usually brought into a city to fund operations and can be dedicated to capital funding. It is also a way to collect money from tax exempt properties. She said right of way maintenance fees charged to utilities is a newer funding mechanism. Funk asked if there are other circumstances where these could be used beyond utilities. Heaton said most cities collect cable fees and use the funds to pay for cable programming. JOINT CITY COUNCILBUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES April 28,2011 Page 3 Case said he would be interested in knowing how many other cities out there use these fees, and he would want a lot more information about this if we decide to use them. He was concerned that we need a way to make it more progressive so it isn't just a flat tax. Heaton said she hasn't seen fees used for tax-exempt federal buildings, and schools are considered somewhat sacred properties. She said it would be important to figure out how to phase in any PILOT fees. She said it has been used in places where a college has located into an established community. She said there are also some new funding source options being considered by the legislature, including a local option sales tax, local payroll and income taxes, street utility fees and development impact fees. Heaton reviewed considerations regarding the City's credit rating and the importance of a high bond rating. She said Eden Prairie currently has an Aaa rating with Moody's, which is the highest possible rating. Butcher Wickstrom asked if other cities' ratings have declined because of the economy. Heaton replied there have not been many in Minnesota but there have been in other areas such as New York City, Las Vegas and Michigan. Getschow said there is a joint workshop scheduled for the Council and the BAC on Tuesday, May 3. The goal of the workshop will be to talk about which of the options should be explored as we think ahead for the next several years. Nelson said it will be a lot to get through in an hour. Getschow said we need to have a little bit of discussion on the budget at the workshop. We will need to have a much larger discussion on City-wide strategic planning. Tyra-Lukens said we need to come to the workshop on Tuesday with our calendars so we can get something nailed down. She thought we might take a Tuesday night in June since the Council has only one meeting scheduled that month. Case said he assumed there would be discussion about the expenditure side as well as discussion of the options for revenue. He was concerned that the projections show us as being completely unfunded at some point in the future. Kotchevar said the projections show the funds will be depleted in five years if we continue with the PAYGO policy. We have tried to put away one-time money,but the question is do we want a more formal strategy as we look at other sources of funding. The BAC is looking for direction from the Council about their role in this discussion. Case said we never decided how we would pay for reconstruction. Kotchevar said a lot of the reconstruction is included in the pavement management plan. Dietz said there is a 30-year plan to maintain the streets,but we don't know where the money for that is coming from. However, if we had a 5% increase per year, we would have it covered. Case noted the CIP funding mechanism was gutted over the last three to five years, so we need to figure out something as we go forward. Kotchevar said whether the Council thinks it is important to special assess citizens for reconstruction projects is a very important policy decision. Dietz said he thought the best way to fund reconstruction is through taxes, but some kind of assessment may be the only way to get it done. He said priorities will have to be made because we are coming up on the need to reconstruct some of our streets. Tyra-Lukens asked which streets need to be reconstructed. Dietz said the Hidden Ponds neighborhood is one example. Jeremiah noted the City survey showed the majority of respondents preferred funding by taxes. Case said we will want to look at what other cities do. JOINT CITY COUNCILBUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES April 28,2011 Page 4 Tyra-Lukens said on Tuesday we will talk about what things we want the BAC to look at. Nelson said we don't have a policy that says we will maintain our roads at the appropriate time, and that may be part of the long range planning. King asked what input the BAC will get from the May 3 workshop that they can use at their May 5 meeting. Tyra-Lukens said the workshop will be held before the Council meeting and staff will have to gather the materials. Case said the focus in the past two years was on ways to cut expenditures, but we should look at increasing revenue as well as cutting expenditures. He thought the focus of the BAC should be on helping find ways to look at revenue options. Tyra-Lukens thanked Ms Heaton for her presentation. III. ADJOURN Mayor Tyra-Lukens adjourned the meeting at 8:00 PM. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Christy Weigel, Clerk's License Application List VII. A. Police/ Support Unit These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. Private Kennel Binh Vuong 19074 Barrington Drive New On-Sale 3.2 Beer License(s) Licensee Name: Eden Prairie HHP II, LLC DBA: Hampton Inn 7740 Flying Cloud Drive Licensee Name: AMK Research Services LLC DBA: Inside Edge Golf 16502 West 78th Street Amendment to Liquor License 2AM Closing Permit- Renewal Kona Sushi Inc. DBA: Kona Grill - 1 - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Agenda 8/16/11 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development/Planning Metropolitan Ford 2011 VII. B. Janet Jeremiah/Regina Rojas Requested Action Move to: • Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 16.2 acres; and • Adopt Resolution for Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres; and • Approve the Development Agreement for Metropolitan Ford 2011; and Synopsis The project includes modifying the existing Suburban Chevrolet building to add a car wash and change the exterior of the front of the building. The project also includes the construction of 39,750 square foot Ford building. Background Information The 120-Day Review Period Expires on October 22, 2011. Attachments 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment 2. Summary Ordinance 3. Resolution for Site Plan Review 4. Development Agreement METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 10-2011-PUD-5-2011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA,AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT,AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT,AND,ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District 10-2011-PUD-5-2011 (hereinafter "PUD-5- 2011-C-Reg-Ser). Section 3. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-5-2011-C-Reg-Ser is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-5-2011-C-Reg-Ser is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-5-2011-C-Reg-Ser are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-5-2011-C-Reg-Ser is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 4. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement dated as of August 16, 2011, entered into between E P Limited Partnership, and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter"Development Agreement"). The Development Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-5-2011-C-Reg-Ser, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 5-2011-C-Reg-Ser, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of July, 2011, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16th day of August, 2011. ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on , 2011. EXHIBIT A PUD Legal Description — Legal Description Before Final Plat Lot 1, Block 1, Menard 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal Description After Final Plat Lot 1-2, Block 1, Metropolitan Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 10-2011-PUD-5-2011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA,AMENDING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN LAND WITHIN ONE DISTRICT,AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amendment of the zoning of land located at 12475 Plaza Drive within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on , 2011. (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 BY EP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, EP Limited Partnership, has applied for Site Plan approval of Metropolitan Ford 2011 to construct a 39,750 square foot Ford building modifying the existing Suburban Chevrolet building to add a car wash and change the exterior of the front of the building by an Ordinance approved by the City Council on July 19, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 27, 2011 meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 19, 2011 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Metropolitan Ford 2011 based on the Development Agreement between EP Limited Partnership and the City of Eden Prairie, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 16, 2011. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement")is entered into as of August 16, 2011, by E P Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," its successors and assigns, and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 16.2 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 16.2acres,Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 16.2acres,Site Plan Review on 16.2 acres,and Preliminary Plat of 16.2 acres into 2 lots, legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. for Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 16.2 acres, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and stamp dated July 19,2011,reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 19,2011, (hereinafter the "Plans") and identified on Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. CROSS ACCESS,PRIVATE UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall provide a Cross Access Easement,Private Utility and Maintenance Agreement between Lots 1 and 2.The form of the Agreement must be approved in writing by the City Engineer.This Agreement shall address joint vehicle access over and maintenance of the parking areas, driveways,private sanitary sewer,ponds,storm sewers,and underground infiltration systems.All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer or Owner. After approval by the City, Developer shall file the Cross Access Easement,Private Utility and Maintenance Agreement with the Hennepin County Recorder/Registrar of Title as appropriate immediately after the recording of the final plat and prior to recording of any document affecting the property including but not limited to any mortgage granted by the Developer or owners, their successors and/or assigns. Prior to the i ssuance of the fi rst bui I di ng permit for the Property, Developer shal I submit to the City Engineer proof that the Cross Access Easement, Private Utility and Maintenance Agreement have been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's Off i cel Regi stra of Titles' Office. 4. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR CODE VIOLATIONS: In the event of a violation of City Code relating to use of the Land construction thereon or failure to fulfill an obligation imposed upon the Developer pursuant to this Agreement,City shall give 24 hour notice of such violation in order to allow a cure of such violation, provided however, City need not issue a building or occupancy permit for construction or occupancy on the Land while such a violation is continuing,unless waived by City. The existence of a violation of City Code or the failure to perform or fulfill an obligation required by this Agreement shall be determined solely and conclusively by the City Manager of the City or a designee. 5. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer shall release,defend and indemnify City,its elected and appointed officials,employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants,contractors,subcontractors,suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. 6. OPERATING REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPLAY AND STORAGE OF VEHICLES: Developer acknowledges that all vehicles shall be parked in areas, and for the specific purposes,depicted in the Plans attached hereto. No vehicles shall be displayed or located on any raised platform, on any roof, within any plating island, or on any berm, or on any landscaped portion of the Property, or upon any street or right-of-way. The only exception shall be allowances for vehicles to be displayed adjacent to the buildings on the sidewalk plazas, as depicted on in the Plans attached hereto. Developer shall not permit on the Property any outside storage of inoperable automobiles, automobile parts, equipment, inventory or refuse. This shall not include the storage of new and used automobiles for sale to the public. 7. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance,Developer shall submit to the City Planner,and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 8. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in the Plans is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all wetland information, including wetland boundaries,wetland buffer strips and wetland buffer monument locations;all Stormwater Facilities, such as water quality ponding areas, stormwater detention areas, and stormwater infiltration systems; and any other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the Stormwater Facilities conform to the final grading plan and that the Stormwater Facilities are functioning in accordance with the approved plans. Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP). The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and SWPPP. I n addition, the design professional retai ned by the Developer to perform the monitoring of the Project shal I be responsible for al I monitoring, data entry and reporting to the Permi Track ESC web-based erosion and sediment permit tracking program utilized by the City. B. STORMWATER FACILITY CONSTRUCTION: Stormwater Facilities, including detention basins, retention basins, Stormwater Infiltration or Filtration Systems(such as rainwater gardens,vegetated swales, infiltration basins,vegetated filters, filter strips, curbless parking lot islands, parking lot islands with curb-cuts, traffic islands, tree box filters, bioretention systems or infiltration trenches) or Underground Systems(such as media filters,underground sand filters,underground vaults,sedimentation chambers,underground infiltration systems,pre-manufactured pipes, modular structures or hydrodynamic separators) shall be maintained by the Developer and or Owner during construction and for a minimum of two (2) full growing seasons after completion of the development to ensure that soil compaction, erosion, clogging, vegetation loss, channelization of flow or accumulation of sediment are not occurring, and thereafter by the Owner of the Property.A Planting Plan for the Stormwater Facilities (where appropriate) must be submitted prior to release of the first building permit for the Development Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan to monitor construction of the Stormwater Facilities for conformance to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency publication entitled"State of Minnesota Storm water Manual" dated November 2005, the approved final grading plan and the requirements listed herein. All inspections of underground systems shall be performed by personnel that have approved OSHA confined space training. All Stormwater Infiltration Systems shall be delineated with erosion control fencing prior to construction. All Stormwater Infiltration Systems shall be installed using low-impact earth moving equipment. No equipment, vehicles, supplies or other materials shall be stored or allowed in the areas designated for stormwater infiltration during construction. Pervious surfaces shall be stabilized with seed and mulch or sod and all impervious surfaces must be completed prior to final grading and planting of the Stormwater Infiltration Systems. All Stormwater Facilities shall be kept free of debris, litter, invasive plants and sediment. Sediment, debris, litter or vegetation removal in Stormwater Infiltration Systems shall be by hand or with a flat-bottomed shovel or rake during dry periods. Only enough sediment shall be removed as needed to restore hydraulic capacity, leaving as much of the vegetation in place as possible. Any damaged turf or vegetation shall be reseeded or replaced. Parking lots and drive lanes that drain to any Stormwater Facilities shall be swept at least weekly during construction and for frequently if necessary to minimize sediment accumulation within the facilities. After the two year period of Developer maintenance,the Owner of the Property shall be responsible for maintenance of the Stormwater Facilities. This shall include regular sweeping of private streets , parking lots or drive aisles; debris and litter removal; removal of noxious and invasive plants; removal of dead and diseased plants;maintenance of approved vegetation;re-mulching of void areas;replanting or reseeding areas where dead or diseased plants were removed; and removal of sediment build-up. Sediment build-up in above-ground Stormwater Infiltration or Filtration Systems shall be removed by hand. Areas above Underground Systems shall be kept free of structures that would limit access to the System for maintenance or replacement. C. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP): Prior to issuance of a land alteration permit,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Property. The SWPPP shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations, turf restoration procedures, concrete truck washout areas and any other best management practices to be utilized within the Project. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved SWPPP. 9. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. The irrigation plan shall be designed so that water is not directed on or over public trails and sidewalks. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 10. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance,the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property depicting a total of 97.3 caliper inches. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity,type,and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on the Plans. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a security in the form of a bond,cash escrow,or letter of credit,equal to 150%of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 11. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to the City Planner,and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit,water meters, and standard heating,ventilating, and air-conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If,after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening,it is determined by the City Planner,in his or her sole discretion,that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that the City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures. 12. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: Developer agrees that the Property will be operated in a manner meeting all applicable noise,vibration,dust and dirt,smoke,odor and glare laws and regulations. Developer further agrees that the facility upon the Property shall be operated so noise,vibration,dust and dirt,smoke,odor and glare do not go beyond the Property boundary lines. 13. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD . Lot 1 (M etropol i tan Ford) A. A PUD waiver for a 0-foot setback to parking from the common lot line. B. Waiver from maximum allowable outside storage and display of 6% of the base area of the building to allow for outdoor storage and display of greater than 6% of the base area of the building as depicted on the Plans Lot 2 (Suburban Chevrolet) A. A PUD waiver for a 0-foot setback to parking from the common lot line. B. Waiver from maximum allowable outside storage and display of 6% of the base area of the building to allow for outdoor storage and display of greater than 6% of the base area of the building as depicted on the Plans. 14. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED BY PUD 10-91: The following waivers granted as part of PUD 10-91 remain in full force and effect: A. Waiver from minimum setback to parking of 17.5 feet to allow a minimum setback to parking of 10 feet along Highway#5. B. Waiver from maximum height of 20 feet to 23 feet along Plaza Drive depicted as monument sign"A" and`B" on the Plans. C. Waiver from maximum height of 20 feet to 58 feet for the existing pylon sign located adjacent to I-494 depicted as monument sign"D"on the Plans. D. Waiver from maximum allowable sign square footage of 80 square feet to 252 square feet for the existing Pylon sign located adjacent to I-494 depicted as monument sign "D" on the Plans. 15. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in the Plans. These plans shall include details with respect to the height,type of materials,and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto,prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 16. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a permit by Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.70,Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location,the manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material construction,and location of any such sign,consistent with the sign plan shown on the Plans and in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Section 11.70, Subdivision 5a. 17. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 18. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash, trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all times be located inside of the building enclosures depicted on the Plans. 19. TRASH ENCLOSURE: Developer has submitted to the City Planner, and obtained the City Planner's written approval of a plan for the design and construction of the outside trash enclosure for the Property. This trash enclosure shall be constructed with face brick to match the building,include a roof,and heavy duty steel gates that completely screen the interior of the enclosure. Developer shall complete implementation of the trash enclosure plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 20. TREE LOSS - TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 399diameter inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 153 diameter inches. Tree replacement required is 78 caliper inches.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property,Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 78 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Prior to issuance of any grading permit for the Property,Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a tree replacement bond equal to 150%of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to occupancy permit issuance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. DEVELOPER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE E P Limited Partnership By By Its Nancy Tyra-Lukens Its Mayor By By _ Its Rick Getschow Its City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16th day of August 2011, by Nancy Tyra-Lukens and Rick Getschow,respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011,by , the , of E P Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of the partnership. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Eden Prairie 8080 M i tchel I Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 Legal Description Before Final Plat Lot 1, Block 1, Menard 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal Description After Final Plat Lot 1-2, Block 1, Metropolitan Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 Sheet Cl—Boundary and Topographic Survey dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C2—Preliminary Plat dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C3—Removals Plan dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C4—Tree Inventory&Preservation Plan dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C5—Civil Site Plan dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C6—Grading, Drainage &Erosion Control Plan dated 07/11/11 Sheet C7—Utility Plan dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C8—Landscape Plan dated 05/23/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet C9— Stormwater Pollution Prevention Notes and Narrative dated 07/11/11 by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sheet A0.1—Title Sheet dated 05/23/11 by Pope Associates Sheet A1.1— Site Plan dated 05/23/11 by Pope Associates Sheet A2.1—First Level Floor Plan dated 05/23/11 by Pope Associates Sheet A2.2—Mezzanine Level Floor Plan dated 05/23/11 by Pope Associates Sheet A2.3—Existing Dealership Floor Plan dated 07/11/11 by Pope Associates Sheet A3.1—Exterior Elevations dated 05/23/11 by Pope Associates Sheet A3.2—Existing Dealership Exterior Elevations dated 07/11/11 by Pope Associates Sheet OSD—Outside Storage and Display Plan dated 08/05/11 by Pope Associates EXHIBIT C DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—METROPOLITAN FORD 2011 I. Prior to release of any building permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for approval two copies of a development plan(1"=100'scale) showing existing and proposed contours,proposed streets,and lot arrangements and size,minimum floor elevations on each lot,preliminary alignment and grades for sanitary sewer,water main,and storm sewer, 100- year flood plain contours, ponding areas, tributary areas to catch basins, arrows showing direction of storm water flow on all lots,location of walks,trails,and any property deeded to the City. II. Developer shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer plans to the Watershed District for review and approval. Developer shall follow all rules and recommendations of said Watershed District. III. Developer shall pay cash park fees as to all of the Property required by City Code in effect as of the date of the issuance of each building permit for construction on the Property. IV. If Developer fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within twenty-four (24) months of the date hereof,Developer,for itself,its successors,and assigns,shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of any Rezoning, Site Plan review and/or Guide Plan review approved in connection with this Agreement, thus restoring the status of the Property before the Development Agreement and all approvals listed above were approved. V. Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Property and the Owners, their successors and assigns of the Property. VI. The Developer hereby irrevocably nominates, constitutes, and appoints and designates the City as its attorney-in-fact for the sole purpose and right to amend Exhibit A hereto to identify the legal description of the Property after platting thereof. VII. Developer represents that it has marketable fee title to the Property, except: A. Wells Fargo Bank B. Metropolitan Corporation With respect to any interest in all portions of the Property which Developer is required, pursuant to this Agreement, to dedicate or convey to the City (the "Dedicated Property"), Developer represents and warrants as follows now and at the time of dedication or conveyance: A. That Developer has marketable fee title free and clear of all mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances. Prior to final plat approval,Developer shall provide to the City a current title insurance policy insuring such a condition of title. B. That Developer has not used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed or otherwise allowed to come in or on the Dedicated Property,any hazardous substance, hazardous waste, pollutant, or contaminant, including, but not limited to, those defined in or pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 9601,et. seq.,or Minn. Stat., Sec. 115B.01,et. seq. (such substances, wastes, pollutants, and contaminants hereafter referred to as "Hazardous Substances"); C. That Developer has not allowed any other person to use, employ, deposit, store, dispose of,place or otherwise have,in or on the Property,any Hazardous Substances. D. To the best of the Developer's knowledge,no previous owner,operator or possessor of the Dedicated Property deposited,stored,disposed of,placed or otherwise allowed in or on the Dedicated Property any hazardous substances. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its successors and assigns, against any and all loss,costs,damage and expense,including reasonable attorneys fees and costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above representations or warranties and/or resulting from or due to the release or threatened release of Hazardous Substances which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been,used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed, or otherwise located or allowed to be located, in or on the Dedicated Property by Developer, its employees, agents, contractors or representatives. VIII. Developer acknowledges that Developer is familiar with the requirements of Chapter 11, Zoning,and Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations,of the City Code and other applicable City ordinances affecting the development of the Property. Developer agrees to develop the Property in accordance with the requirements of all applicable City Code requirements and City Ordinances. IX. Prior to release of the final plat,Developer shall pay to City fees for the first three(3)years' street lighting on the public streets adjacent to the Property(including installation costs, if any, as determined by electrical power provider), engineering review, and street signs. X. Developer shall submit detailed water main, fire protection, and emergency vehicle access plans to the Fire Marshal for review and approval. Developer shall follow all the recommendations of the Fire Marshal. XI. Developer acknowledges that the rights of City performance of obligations of Developer contemplated in this agreement are special, unique, and of an extraordinary character, and that, in the event that Developer violates, or fails, or refuses to perform any covenant, condition, or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy at law. Developer agrees,therefore,that in the event Developer violates,fails,or refuses to perform any covenant, condition, or provision made herein, City may, at its option, institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforce such covenant, withhold building permits or rescind or revoke any approvals granted by the City. No remedy conferred in this agreement is intended to be exclusive and each shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy. The election of anyone or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of any other remedy. XII. Developer shall,prior to the commencement of any improvements,provide written notice to Comcast of the development contemplated by this Development Agreement. Notice shall be sent to Comcast Cable, 9705 Data Park, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343. XIII. Prior to building permit issuance,all fees associated with the building permit shall be paid to the Inspections Department,including;Building permit fee,plan check fee,State surcharge, metro system access charge(SAC),City SAC and City water access charge(WAC),and park dedication. Contact Metropolitan Waste Control to determine the number of SAC units. XIV. Prior to building permit issuance, except as otherwise authorized in the approved Plans, existing structures, wells and septic systems (if present) shall be properly abandoned or removed as required by City ordinance and all permits obtained through the Inspections Department. XV. Prior to building permit issuance,provide two copies of an approved survey or site plan(1"= 200 scale)showing proposed building location and all proposed streets,with approved street names, lot arrangements and property lines. XVI. The City shall not issue any building permit for the construction of any building,structure,or improvement on the Property until all requirements listed in this Exhibit C have been satisfactorily addressed by Developer. XVII. No failure of the City to comply with any term,condition,covenant or agreement herein shall subject the City to liability for any claim for damages, costs or other financial or pecuniary charges. No execution on any claim, demand, cause of action or judgment shall be levied upon or collected from the general credit, general fund or taxing powers of the City. XVIII. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the Property, Developer shall permanently demarcate the location of the boundary of the conservation easement on each lot property line or corner with permanent four-foot tall posts. A 2 '/2 by 6 inch sign or decal reading "Scenic/Conservation Easement Boundary,City of Eden Prairie",will be affixed to the top of the post. XIX. Within 10 days of the approval of the Development Agreement,the Developer shall record the Development Agreement at the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles. The final plat shall not be released until proof of filing of the Development Agreement is submitted to the City. XX. The City is hereby granted the option, but not the obligation, to complete or cause completion in whole or part of all of the Developer's obligations under this Agreement for which a bond, letter of credit, cash deposit or other security(hereinafter referred to as the "Security")is required if the Developer defaults with respect to any term or condition in this Agreement for which Security is required and fails to cure such default(s) within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice thereof from the City;provided however if the nature of the cure is such that it is not possible to complete the cure within ten (10) days, it shall be sufficient if the Developer has initiated and is diligently pursuing such cure. The Developer acknowledges that the City does not assume any obligations or duties of the Developer with respect to any such contract agreements unless the City shall agree in writing to do so. The City may draw down on or make a claim against the Security,as appropriate,upon five (5)business days notice to the Developer,for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or if the Security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the obligations for which Security is required are not completed at least thirty(30)days prior to the expiration of the Security and if the Security has not then been renewed,replaced or otherwise extended beyond the expiration date, the City may also draw down or make a claim against the Security as appropriate. If the Security is drawn down on or a claim is made against the Security, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default(s) and to reimburse the City for all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fee, incurred by the City in enforcing this Agreement. XXI. The Developer hereby grants the City, it's agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with this Agreement. XXII. This Agreement is a contract agreement between the City and the Developer. No provision of this Agreement inures to the benefit of any third person,including the public at large,so as to constitute any such person as a third-party beneficiary of the Agreement or of any one or more of the terms hereof, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action for any person not a party hereto. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Randy L. Slick Final Plat Report of Metropolitan VII. C. Public Works/Engineering Addition Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Metropolitan Addition. Synopsis This proposal is for the plat located at 12475 Plaza Drive. The plat consists of 16.2 acres to be divided into two lots. Lot 1 is the proposed site of the 39,570 sq.ft Metropolitan Ford dealership and Lot 2 is the existing Suburban Chevrolet site which will include a 1,111 sq. ft building addition. This is a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Menards 3rd Addition. Background Information The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on July 19, 2011. Second reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement will be completed on August 16, 2011. Approval of the final plat is subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$2,235.60. • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement. • Provide a list of areas (to the nearest square foot) of all lots, outlots and road right-of- ways certified by surveyor. • Prior to release of final plat, Developer shall provide a Cross Access and Maintenance Agreement between Lots 1 and 2. • Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall record and provide proof of filing the Development Agreement at the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles. Attachments • Resolution • Drawing of final plat CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF METROPOLITAN ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Metropolitan Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: A. Plat approval request for Metropolitan Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the Final Plat Report on this plat dated August 16, 2011. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 16, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Kathleen Porta, City Clerk METROPOLITAN ADDITION R. T. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That E P limited partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: , I 60 0 60 120 180 Lot 1, Block 1, MENARD 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. i. Scale in feet Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as METROPOLITAN ADDITION and does hereby donate and w ,,�N dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility - \,Jr R=1010.00 =31V7'48" purposes as shown on this plat. `, L_548•76 ` ` -S79°04'22"E 387.36 For the purpose of splat, the northeasterly - _ _ - line of Lot 1, Block 1, MENARD 3RD ADDITION is 0 In witness whereof said E P limited partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, has caused these presents ° `„r``-` _ -- 510 12'14"E --- - - - i assumed be bear South 63 degrees 44 minutes to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 N25 46 22 E` \ - - 1780 _ - - 56 seconds East 29.02 \ E P limited partnership PK nail -, - — \ _ - - - T — - - _ - - -3 00 \ \\ 1 1 � S6Jo 0 Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron monument - - St set and marked byLicense No. 43933 2.75 / - _ - \ \ o� St B N18°00'00"W`'= ;5°23 39 _ — - - — N E 48�_1 \1-7 \ \ o. S6� • Denotes found iron monument y Tom Grossman, General Partner 29.02 -, -\7 31'0l — _ _ - _ - - - - I \\ _ / \ (unless otherwise noted) /-------, - _105.56 -� i BLOCK \\so ���� 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA / o O. - — — 1 I 1 \ ��,�\ COUNTY OF a \ \ �, \ 1 `90 j O 1 -- Drainage & \ <<`\ 9, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 r7 \ g \ I utility Easement \ ��\ ? by Tom Grossman, General Partner of E P limited partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of \ O ^ r7 I I \ -D \ `� I A, the partnership. N J II II \ \\ \\ \oDO o I \ �a 1 a -1 \ // - - \ - - �� ' z I \ \ 0, -i -i 1 o Io o \ (Signature) (Name Printed) I o\ i I \�, \ \ \ N 589 49'12"W 229.98 ' 6` NO2 00 00 E - _- o N' 1 _ 1 ° 23.28 I I� 1 <-�T \ \ � � I �\ I �' \ Notary Public, County, Minnesota '-h IW I \\ \ ��� o I v \ , — o My Commission Expires Drill hole in -`�- ; T Drainage & Utility I� I , I \ O 1 concrete / Easement N \ �' d- U \ 13.84 I _ I C3�N I Mark R. Salo do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I 60 I-_ 10.00 I� 1\ 1 I r,i am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of r- \ \ I 1 1 I \ the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all I II ?s I I I Existin Drainage 1 _,1- I \ monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water N I N89°51'19"E -- \\ I & UtilitygEasement�NH4o I ,\ boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of I Co \ 31.36 I 2 �1� I \\` A'-� this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. \\ H- —1 N I 1 <<'�„ I \\ C`�, V 1 Iw71 I A \ �;> Dated this day of , 2073 0 1� �I I \ w I l0 1 1 0-0° A 10.00 -- o 5.00 I \ `, 0 �� �- �- 0.00 I I� I - 5.00 I A � Op 10.00 -1 �- I A �= Mark R. Salo, Land Surveyor �� 10.00 -I I I - \ N Minnesota License No. 43933 ? 0 A o 1 1 / I la % V 1 1 <- �L� �� N o I I II STATE OF COUNTY OF MINNESOTA \ o_ 7 I 'o /� J I O �v 1 / i6 I U This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 , by \ O, ' Mark R. Salo, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 43933. c.H \ \\ 1 N44°59'15"w I �� ' / '�/ \ - 15.33 I I Q 1 /,�/ (S. _ / � / , I I Chided X in /4, / /,\\ \. < I concrete v , I / I/i�L I /,�"� /SI'// s ) I / I I (Signature) (Name Printed) I /NoR L--- /5k < / Sanitary Sewer Easement per-z- I Notary Public, County, Minnesota -\� // �� Doc. No. 3779102 ,'I My Commission Expires ��� / /ti� i / Ia O �� 00 00 / / I� - Location of 1 c3 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA \ \o' �/� / `\ / o I Transmission Line L \ \I' /I /\ o Easement I CO This plat of METROPOLITAN ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Eden Prairie, ' <�, / / I per Doc. No. 3552513 d, Minnesota, at a regular meetingthereof held this dayof , 20 . If �, , Drainage & Utility Easement g .\...-_-_:_-_,-Drainage I / Drainage & Utility Easement I I II applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the \ 2 ( / I la County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed \ xS \\ \ ! I without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 0 90 \ I L1 O- S77°30'07"W �� I 1 505.03, Subdivision 2. ��� 003 vv 24.98-� � V ��<_. I I o) '�� 2°.91 \ / / 4 / I (26 CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA / 7 -i \ V / v I 1 v v���� / , j A I \ I / co 1 p / d / // i A 10_0° 1 NW Bell Telephone-1 I. _, I Easement per Doc, \\ 1 By By / % / \/ I 1 I No. 3359796 v\ Mayor Manager / <` / // / ,�o ,N� V Ate 10.00 1 ��� in �_'� soo / /����� \ V�A 1 1/ (0 TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota \ / _,.\ \ oho �� \ o\\ I I co I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this \ / \ / / soo I\\ W\ I /� v plat, dated this day of , 20 \�-.\V I // \ }-523°57'16 w \�_ o , Drainage & Utility Easement l (--� >\ \ 36.22 \ \•� -'/ Jill L. Alverson, County Auditor By j, \\ \f 'I / I Drainage Easement/ -` / Deputy \I \ \ 1 \ rr, v `d, I \ A I / .R" s V I / SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota \ \\ \\ \ \ I '000 / Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this day of H7-1 \ I �/ , 20 . ,- west 1/4 corner of Sec. 1, T. 116, R. 22 -- \ I S / - found CIM \ \ I oo / �\ /a I v \ / v I / William P. Brown, County Surveyor By \ oo \`��\ , \ NI / \ 572°o1'o9"w %/ I / Vv � , �-/%'--22.43 / v A ) I S 0 0 C REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota o 6 / 00 , O O �.o /� I hereby certify that the within plat of METROPOLITAN ADDITION was filed in this office this day of 1 �7,: _ / O' O -�/ O '\Az, , 20 , at o'clock .M. I o -P4 A / ,�t\ O, 44 O���e.7�til -- Chisled X iri I A\ �� tit S9 L, 'e9 concr-te, Drainage & --. N vS O O \ - Utility Easement (0c� Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles By ° / (ICJ 00 per MENARD 3RD ADDITION 0� Deputy N89 44'34"E �� �\ �� \ >S00°0o'0o"E SOo°O0'00"E I �� N89°44'34"E \ ,, 42.25 22.04 j, i/� 1445.57 - - - - / I i C G� 997 64 77 / I/ n/ / I HN i- — \ N / \/\� x\J south 1/4 corner of -, 0 / O \ \ \ Sec. 7, T 116, R. 22 o ���) \ \ / found CIM v ^ o Westwoo R • / / 1['\ \ \ / Professional Services, Inc. Sheet 1 of 1 sheets CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Development Janet Jeremiah 2011 CDBG Subrecipient Agreements. VII. D. Housing & Human Services Molly Koivumaki Requested Council Action: Move to: Approve resolution authorizing execution of the 2011 CDBG Subrecipient Agreements between the City of Eden Prairie and the activities to be undertaken with program funds. The City is required to execute subrecipient agreements for each CDBG activity approved for funding. These agreements specify the requirements for implementing each activity. Activities approved by the City Council for 2011 include: Human Services Activity Funding Level 1 PROP (People Reaching Out to Other People) $25,000 2 Southdale YMCA $12,000 3 HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for $9,000 the Elderly) 4 Emergency Vehicle Repair $8,000 Sub Total $54,000 Housing Activities Funding Level 5 Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Loan Program $103,668 6 Affordable Housing/Land Trust $50,000 7 Fair Housing Initiative $2,333 8 Program Administration $23,333 Total $233,334 Background Eden Prairie is the recipient of an annual grant from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Program regulations require that a Subrecipient Agreement be executed by the City and subrecipients which set forth the specific implementation processes for activities to be undertaken with program funds. Attachment Resolution CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS FOR THE 2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM(CDBG) WHEREAS Eden Prairie is the recipient of an annual grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and PROP, Senior Community Services, YMCA, and Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin County, are subrecipients that receive a share of the grant; and WHEREAS,program regulations require that a Subrecipient Agreement be executed by the City and subrecipients which set forth the specific implementation processes for activities to be undertaken with program funds. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreements between the City and the subrecipients on behalf of the City. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Trya-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Rob Reynolds, Police Chief Joint Powers Agreement with Bureau of Criminal VII. E. Police Apprehension (BCA) for Minnesota Criminal Justice Data Communications Network(CJDN) Requested Action Move to: Adopt the resolution approving the joint powers agreement which will establish a relationship between the City of Eden Prairie and the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension(BCA) for access to the Minnesota Criminal Justice Data Communications Network(CJDN). Synopsis The BCA agrees to provide the City of Eden Prairie Police Department with access to the Minnesota Criminal Justice Data Communications Network(CJDN) and those systems and tools which the Eden Prairie Police Department is authorized by law to access via the CJDN for purposes outlined in Minnesota State Statute § 229C.46. Attachments Resolution Joint Powers Agreement CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ON BEHALF OF ITS CITY ATTORNEY AND POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Police Department desires to enter into Joint Powers Agreements with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to use systems and tools available over the State's criminal justice data communications network for which the City is eligible. The Joint Powers Agreements further provide the City with the ability to add, modify and delete connectivity, systems and tools over the five year life of the agreement and obligates the City to pay the costs for the network connection. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements by and between the State of Minnesota acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the City of Eden Prairie on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Police Department, are hereby approved. Copies of the Joint Powers Agreement are attached to this Resolution and made a part of it. 2. That the Chief, Rob Reynolds, or his or her successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Police Department. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City's connection to the systems and tools offered by the State. To assist the Authorized Representative with the administration of the agreement,James DeMann, Deputy Chief is appointed as the Authorized Representative's designee. 3. That the Attorney, Patrick Leach, or his or her successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Prosecuting Attorney. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City's connection to the MICAC Task Force. To assist the Authorized Representative with the administration of the agreement, Thomas F. DeVincke, Attorney is appointed as the Authorized Representative's designee. 4. That Nancy Tyra-Lukens,the Mayor for the City of Eden Prairie, and Rick Getschow,the City Manager, are authorized to sign the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on August 16,2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk DPS-M-1323 MN027201 A STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCY This agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension("BCA") and the City of Eden Prairie on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney("Agency"). Recitals Under Minn. Stat. § 471.59,the BCA and the Agency are empowered to engage in such agreements as are necessary to exercise their powers. Under Minn. Stat. § 299C.46 the BCA must provide a criminal justice data communications network to benefit criminal justice agencies in Minnesota. The Agency is authorized by law to utilize the criminal justice data communications network pursuant to the terms set out in this agreement. In addition, BCA either maintains repositories of data or has access to repositories of data that benefit criminal justice agencies in performing their duties. Agency wants to access these data in support of its criminal justice duties. The purpose of this Agreement is to create a method by which the Agency has access to those systems and tools for which it has eligibility, and to memorialize the requirements to obtain access and the limitations on the access. Agreement 1 Term of Agreement 1.1 Effective date: This Agreement is effective on the date the BCA obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subdivision 2. 1.2 Expiration date: This Agreement expires five years from the date it is effective. 2 Agreement between the Parties 2.1 General access. BCA agrees to provide Agency with access to the Minnesota Criminal Justice Data Communications Network(CJDN) and those systems and tools which the Agency is authorized by law to access via the CJDN for the purposes outlined in Minn. Stat. § 299C.46. 2.2 Methods of access. The BCA offers three(3)methods of access to its systems and tools. The methods of access are: A. Direct access occurs when individual users at the Agency use Agency's equipment to access the BCA's systems and tools. This is generally accomplished by an individual user entering a query into one of BCA's systems or tools. B. Indirect access occurs when individual users at the Agency go to another Agency to obtain data and information from BCA's systems and tools. This method of access generally results in the Agency with indirect access obtaining the needed data and infojniation in a physical format like a paper report. C. Computer-to-computer system interface occurs when Agency's computer exchanges data and information with BCA's computer systems and tools using an interface. Without limitation, interface types include: state message switch, web services, enterprise service bus and message queuing. For purposes of this Agreement,Agency employees or contractors may use any of these methods to use BCA's systems and tools as described in this Agreement. Agency will select a method of access and can change the methodology following the process in Clause 2.10. 2.3 Federal systems access.In addition, pursuant to 28 CFR§20.30-38 and Minn. Stat. §299C.58, BCA will provide Agency with access to the Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI)National Crime Information Center. i DPS-M-1323 MN027201A 2.4 Agency policies. Both the BCA and the FBI's Criminal Justice Infoimation Systems (FBI-CJIS)have policies, regulations and laws on access, use, audit, dissemination, hit confirmation, logging, quality assurance, screening(pre- employment), security,timeliness,training, use of the system,and validation. Agency has created its own policies to ensure that Agency's employees and contractors comply with all applicable requirements. Agency ensures this compliance through appropriate enforcement. These BCA and FBI-CJIS policies and regulations, as amended and updated from time to time, are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The policies are available at www.dps.state.mn.us/cjdn/. 2.5 Agency resources. To assist Agency in complying with the federal and state requirements on access to and use of the various systems and tools, information is available at https://sps.x.state.mn.us/sites/bcaservicecatalog/default.aspx. 2.6 Access granted. A. Agency is granted permission to use all current and future BCA systems and tools for which Agency is eligible. Eligibility is dependent on Agency(i) satisfying all applicable federal or state statutory requirements; (ii) complying with the terms of this Agreement; and(iii) acceptance by BCA of Agency's written request for use of a specific system or tool. B. To facilitate changes in systems and tools,Agency grants its Authorized Representative authority to make written requests for those systems and tools provided by BCA that the Agency needs to meet its criminal justice obligations and for which Agency is eligible. 2.7 Future access. On written request by Agency, BCA also may provide Agency with access to those systems or tools which may become available after the signing of this Agreement,to the extent that the access is authorized by applicable state and federal law. Agency agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement that when utilizing new systems or tools provided under this Agreement. 2.8 Limitations on access. BCA agrees that it will comply with applicable state and federal laws when making information accessible. Agency agrees that it will comply with applicable state and federal laws when accessing, entering, using, disseminating, and storing data. Each party is responsible for its own compliance with the most current applicable state and federal laws. 2.9 Supersedes prior agreements. This Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements between the BCA and the Agency regarding access to and use of systems and tools provided by BCA. 2.10 Requirement to update information. The parties agree that if there is a change to any of the information whether required by law or this Agreement,the party will send the new information to the other party in writing within 30 days of the change. This clause does not apply to changes in systems or tools provided under this Agreement. This requirement to give notice additionally applies to changes in the individual or organization serving a city as its prosecutor. Any change in performance of the prosecutorial function needs to be provided to the BCA in writing by giving notice to the Service Desk, BCA.ServiceDesk a,state.mn.us. 2.11 Transaction record. The BCA creates and maintains a transaction record for each exchange of data utilizing its systems and tools. In order to meet FBI-CJIS requirements and to perform the audits described in Clause 7, there must be a method of identifying which individual users at the Agency conducted a particular transaction. If Agency uses either direct access as described in Clause 2.2A or indirect access as described in Clause 2.2B, BCA's transaction record meets FBI-CJIS requirements. When Agency's method of access is a computer to computer interface as described in Clause 2.2C,the Agency must keep a transaction record sufficient to satisfy FBI-CJIS requirements and permit the audits described in Clause 7 to occur. 2 DPS-M-1323 MN027201A If an Agency accesses and maintains data from the Driver and Vehicle Services Division in the Minnesota Department of Public Safety,Agency must have a transaction record of all access to the data that are maintained. The transaction record must include the individual user who requested access, and the date, time and content of the request. The transaction record must also include the date,time and content of the response along with the destination to which the data were sent. The transaction record must be maintained for a minimum of six(6)years from the date" the transaction occurred and must be made available to the BCA within one (1)business day of the BCA's request. 2.12 Court information access. Certain BCA systems and tools that include access to and/or submission of Court Records may only be utilized by the Agency if the Agency completes the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, which upon execution will be incorporated into this Agreement by reference. These BCA systems and tools are identified in the written request made by Agency under Clause 2.6 above. The Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment provides important additional terms, including but not limited to privacy(see Clause 8.2, below), fees (see Clause 3 below), and transaction records or logs, that govern Agency's access to and/or submission of the Court Records delivered through the BCA systems and tools. 3 Payment The Agency currently accesses the criminal justice data communications network described in Minn. Stat. §299C.46. No charges will be assessed to the agency as a condition of this agreement. If Agency chooses to execute the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment referred to in Clause 2.12 in order to access and/or submit Court Records via BCA's systems, additional fees, if any, are addressed in that amendment. 4 Authorized Representatives The BCA's Authorized Representative is Dana Gotz,Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Minnesota Justice Information Services, 1430 Maryland Avenue, St.Paul,MN 55106, 651-793-1007, or her successor. The Agency's Authorized Representative is The Agency's Authorized Representative is Rick Getschow, City Manager, 8080 Mitchell Road,Eden Prairie, MN 55344, 952-949-8300 or his/her successor. 5 Assignment,Amendments,Waiver,and Contract Complete 5.1 Assignment. Neither party may assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement. 5.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement, except those described in Clauses 2.6 and 2.7 above must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been signed and approved by the same parties who signed and approved the original agreement, or their successors in office. 5.3 Waiver. If either party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement,that failure does not waive the provision or the right to enforce it. 5.4 Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the BCA and the Agency. No other understanding regarding this Agreement,whether written or oral,may be used to bind either party. 6 Liability Each party will be responsible for its own acts and behavior and the results thereof and shall not be responsible or liable for the other parry's actions and consequences of those actions. The Minnesota Torts Claims Act, Minn. Stat. § 3.736 and other applicable laws govern the BCA's liability. The Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466, governs the Agency's liability. 7 Audits 7.1 Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5,the Agency's books, records, documents, internal policies and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the BCA,the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. Under Minn. Stat. § 6.551,the State Auditor may examine the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of BCA. The examination shall be limited to the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices that are relevant to this Agreement. 3 DPS-M-1323 MN027201 A 7.2 Under applicable state and federal law,the Agency's records are subject to examination by the BCA to ensure compliance with laws, regulations and policies about access, use, and dissemination of data. 7.3 If Agency accesses federal databases,the Agency's records are subject to examination by the FBI and Agency will cooperate with FBI examiners and make any requested data available for review and audit. 7.4 To facilitate the audits required by state and federal law,Agency is required to have an inventory of the equipment used to access the data covered by this Agreement and the physical location of each. 8 Government Data Practices 8.1 BCA and Agency. The Agency and BCA must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data accessible under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected,received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Agency under this Agreement. The remedies of Minn. Stat. §§ 13.08 and 13.09 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Agency or the BCA. 8.2 Court Records.If Agency chooses to execute the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment referred to in Clause 2.12 in order to access and/or submit Court Records via BCA's systems,the following provisions regarding data practices also apply. The Court is not subject to Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 (see section 13.90)but is subject to the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court. All parties acknowledge and agree that Minn. Stat. § 13.03, subdivision 4(e)requires that the BCA and the Agency comply with the Rules of Public Access for those data received from Court under the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment. All parties also acknowledge and agree that the use of, access to or submission of Court Records, as that term is defined in the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, may be restricted by rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court, applicable state statute or federal law. All parties acknowledge and agree that these applicable restrictions must be followed in the appropriate circumstances. 9 Investigation of alleged violations; sanctions For purposes of this clause, "Individual User"means an employee or contractor of Agency. 9.1 Investigation. Agency and BCA agree to cooperate in the investigation and possible prosecution of suspected violations of federal law, state law, and policies and procedures referenced in this Agreement. When BCA becomes aware that a violation may have occurred,BCA will inform Agency of the suspected violation, subject to any restrictions in applicable law. When Agency becomes aware that a violation has occurred,Agency will inform BCA subject to any restrictions in applicable law. 9.2 Sanctions Involving Only BCA Systems and Tools. The following provisions apply to BCA systems and tools not covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment. 9.2.1 For BCA systems and tools that are not covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment,Agency must determine if and when an involved Individual User's access to systems or tools is to be temporarily or permanently eliminated. The decision to suspend or terminate access may be made as soon as alleged violation is discovered, after notice of an alleged violation is received, or after an investigation has occurred. Agency must report the status of the Individual User's access to BCA without delay. 9.2.2 If BCA determines that Agency has jeopardized the integrity of the systems or tools covered in this Clause 9.2, BCA may temporarily stop providing some or all the systems or tools under this Agreement until the failure is remedied to the BCA's satisfaction. If Agency's failure is continuing or repeated, Clause 11.1 does not apply and BCA may terminate this Agreement immediately. 4 DPS-M-1323 MN027201A 9.3 Sanctions Involving Only Court Data Services The following provisions apply to those systems and tools covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, if it has been signed by Agency. As part of the agreement between the Court and the BCA for the delivery of the systems and tools that are covered by the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment, BCA is required to suspend or tenminate access to or use of the systems and tools either on its own initiative or when directed by the Court. The decision to suspend or terminate access may be made as soon as an alleged violation is discovered, after notice of an alleged violation is received, or after an investigation has occurred. The decision to suspend or terminate may also be made based on a request from the Authorized Representative of Agency. The agreement further provides that only the Court has the authority to reinstate access and use. 9.3.1 Agency understands that if it has signed the Court Data Services Subscriber Amendment and if Agency's Individual Users violate the provisions of that Amendment, access and use will be suspended by BCA or Court. Agency also understands that reinstatement is only at the direction of the Court. 9.3.2 Agency further agrees that if Agency believes that one or more of its Individual Users have violated the terms of the Amendment, it will notify BCA and Court so that an investigation as described in Clause 9.1 may occur. 10 Venue Venue for all legal proceedings involving this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 11 Termination 11.1 Termination. The BCA or the Agency may terminate this Agreement at any time,with or without cause,upon 30 days' written notice to the other party's Authorized Representative. 11.2 Termination for Insufficient Funding. Either party may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written notice to the other party's authorized representative. The Agency is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However,the BCA will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available.Neither party will be assessed any penalty if the agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds.Notice of the lack of funding must be provided within a reasonable time of the affected party receiving that notice. 12 Continuing obligations The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this Agreement: 6. Liability; 7. Audits; 8. Government Data Practices; 9. Investigation of alleged violations; sanctions; and 10.Venue. (THE REMAINING PORTION OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 5 DPS-M-1323 MN027201A The parties indicate their agreement and authority to execute this Agreement by signing below. 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 3. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,BUREAU OF Individual certifies that fiends have been encumbered as required CRIMINAL APPREHENSION by Minn.Stat.§§16A.15 and 16C.05. Name: Name: (PRINTED) (PRINTED) Signed: Signed: Date: Title: (with delegated authority) CFMS Contract No.A- Date: 2. AGENCY Name: 4. COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION (PRINTED) delegated to Materials Management Division Signed: By: Title: Date: (with delegated authority) Date: Name: (PRINTED) Signed: Title: (with delegated authority) Date: • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Stuart Fox, Parks and Natural Resolution Requesting a Limited-Use Permit VII. F. Resources Manager, Parks and for Non-Motorized Recreational Trail Recreation Motion Move to: Adopt the resolution requesting a limited use permit for non-motorized trail. Synopsis The city Park and Open Space Plan has shown a transportation trail linking Riley Lake Road with Rice Marsh Lake Park for over 25 years. During the Highway 212 design process,plans to accommodate this trail corridor were included in the final design. When the Highway 212 Bridge crossing of Riley Creek was constructed a trail corridor was graded into the bank on the west side of the creek by the contractor. During the planning and prior to the highway construction there was a considerable amount of land acquired for the 212 road corridor. Because of the presence of wetlands and woodlands there is a quite a bit of road right of way on the south side of the highway adjacent to the Bearpath Development. This is the area where a portion of the proposed trail will be built on MN DOT right of way property, outside of the sound wall. As we move forward with engineering and design services for the bike trail link between Riley Lake Road and the TH 212 Bridge, city staff has been in discussions with staff at MN DOT in regards to building a trail on their right of way property. As in the past the city must enter into a Limited-Use Permit(LUP) in order to build,maintain and operate a bike trail within the highway ROW. Adopting this resolution is the first step in developing this LUP document. With passage of the resolution the Mayor and City Manager will be authorized to sign the final Limited Use Permit on behalf of the City after its preparation by MN DOT staff. It is anticipated that the Limited Use Permit will be prepared and ready for signatures by the end of September. Attachment Limited Use Permit Resolution CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIMITED-USE PERMIT FOR NON-MOTORIZED RECREATIONAL TRAIL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie is the official governing body of the City of Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to construct a non-motorized recreational trail from the TH 212 Bridge to Riley Lake Road; and WHEREAS, this non-motorized recreational trail begins within and then crosses the right of way property for Trunk Highway 212 before it enters onto City property; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation requires a limited-use permit for all non-motorized recreational trails constructed within their right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Eden Prairie do authorize the approval of a limited-use permit for the construction, maintenance and operation of a non-motorized recreational trail within the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 212. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 16, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor SEAL ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Stuart A. Fox, Parks and Permit for Winter Use of the LRT Trail VII. G. Natural Resources Manager Requested Action Move to: Authorize staff to submit a Winter Trail Activities Permit to Three Rivers Park District for the 2011-2012 winter season usage of the LRT trail. The winter activity use permit will run from November 15, 2011 to March 31, 2012. Synopsis Currently, Three Rivers Park District does not provide any maintenance of the Regional LRT trail system between November 15 and March 31 of each year. If winter use is desired it is up to the individual cities to request a permit for a specific use(s) of the trail during this "off maintenance"time period. Since the portion of the trail within the city is heavily used by residents, the City has requested and entered into a Winter Use Permit agreement for the past 10+ winters. This has enabled the public to hike/walk, snowshoe or cross-country ski on the LRT corridor trail during the winter months. The 2011 permit request seeks authorization from Three Rivers for walking, snowshoeing and cross country skiing activities. The park staff would plow the LRT for walking activities however we do not set tracks for snowshoeing or cross-country skiing. Another condition of the permit is that park staff removes the garbage from the trash receptacles along the trail during the winter months. Without the City applying and receiving a winter activities permit, the trail would be signed as closed and unavailable to the public. Attachment 2011-2012 Winter Trail Activities Permit Application THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT REGIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM 2011-2012 WINTER USE PERMIT Name of City Ebel.) PRP►IRI . City Hall Phone (452-g4o1-83OO Contact Person WIATI 13O02nit Phone ?15Z• 1441-8535 Contact Person Email Address 1VlbOL)RN6 @ ettn4AzAirzig, O2C* Maintenance Contact Person 4. E2► i Phone 9 5 Z• 94' • 8634.. Maintenance Contact Person Email Address beta/Qs-re eDexPoiveic o , Regional Trail From C/ZOSS7v41 ' � to TZi'!.E`1 72� Authorized 2011-2012 Winter Activities 10#41.?.N6) SiNfruiSi ETA/el) Cif1OSS CDeMni2Y Regional Trail From to Authorized 2011-2012 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2011-2012 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2011-2012 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2011-2012 Winter Activities Regional Trail From to Authorized 2011-2012 Winter Activities Authorization Is hereby requested from the Park District Board of Commissioners to use portions of the Regional Trail Corridor for winter use activities between November 15, 2011 and March 31, 2012, as determined by each municipality within guidelines set forth herein on District Regional Trails located within Individual City boundaries. It is understood and agreed that approval from the Park District Board of Commissioners is contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The City agrees to defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the Park District, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its respective contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by the City, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the winter use of the Regional Trail Corridor. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the City of any statutory or common law defenses, immunities, or limits on liability. The City cannot be required to pay on behalf of itself and Three Rivers Park District, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. If City maintains general liability insurance at the time this permit is issued, City shall provide the Park District with a Certificate of Insurance, naming Three Rivers Park District as an additional named insured. 2. The City agrees to schedule regular trash pick-up that is appropriate to the level of use expected on the permitted.section(s) of trail so as not to create conditions where trash containers are overflowing or offensively odorous. 3. The City also agrees to maintain the trail, Including, but not limited to, any plowing, sweeping, sanding, packing, and sign replacement, between November 15, 2011 - March 31, 2012. For ice control on aggregate trails, Cities agree to use buff colored, 3/8" clear limestone chips from Edward Kramer and Sons, Burnsville, MN. Edward Kramer and Sons is the:only aggregate pit that supplies the buff colored limestone that has been specified for"us'e"ori these trails. Paved trails can be treated with.a Corrosion Inhibited/Treated Rock Salt: (Specifications:' A mixture of Regular Road Salt, Type I,'Grade I, ASTM-D-632 - Modified per Mn/DOT Specification, blended with a Mn/DOT approved magnesium chloride-based product for anti-icing or deicing use,or.arr approved: blend.of Regular Road Salt and a magnesium chloride- based product. The magnesium chloride-based product will also contain an agricultural ,processing residue or an alternative Mn/DOT approved ,agent that will depress the effective working temperature and decrease corrosiveness' of the overall compound as well as prevent leaching of the treating solution) or other chemical treatments approved: by the Park District. The City further agrees to immediately address all safety issues on or adjacent to trails. 4. The City will provide signage at locations approved by the Park District, notifying the public of authorized winter activities within its city limits; activities may include, but are not limited to, hiking, biking, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, or walking. Winter use signs must be installed by the City at designated locations prior to November 15, 2011 and removed by the City no later than April 15, 2012. These signs are totally the responsibility of each municipality. 5. Snowmobiling is not allowed on Park District regional trails. Permitted use for snowmobiles will be limited to direct crossings only. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) does not allow snowmobiling or other motorized use within its corridors. The Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail, Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail, Cedar Lake LRT Regional Trail, and the Dakota Rail Regional Trail are located on HCRRA corridor property and permission for a snowmobile crossing of an HCRRA corridor must be obtained from the HCRRA prior to requesting permission from the Park District for a snowmobile crossing of the regional trail within the corridor. If a snowmobile crossing is permitted, cities must take steps to keep snowmobiles from damaging paved trails, bridges and other property. 6. The City agrees to enforce rules and regulations established by the municipality as part of its request for a Winter Use Permit. 7. The City agrees to repair all trail surface damage that occurs as a result of winter trail activities and/or maintenance, including, but not limited to, bituminous/concrete repair, bridge deck repair, grading or adding aggregate pursuant to guidelines established by the Park District. The City shall contact the Park District prior to the start of any surface repairs, for review of proposed repair plans and authorization to proceed. 8. The City agrees that winter trail use will be available to all persons, regardless of residence. Each City is required to submit its annual permit requests, including proposed rules and regulations, by September 16, 2011, after which the Park District may take up to 45 business days to process. Each permit request must be submitted as a result of formal City Council action, with accompanying verification, agreeing to the terms and conditions outlined by the Park District's Winter Use Permit. The Park District reserves the right to terminate a permit at any time, if the conditions set forth herein are not followed. Signed: Date: Title: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 11-5796 ITEM NO.: Rod Rue Award Contract to Parrot Contracting, Inc. VII. H. Public Works/Engineering for the East Staring Lane Watermain Extension Project Requested Action Move to: Award Contract for East Staring Lane Watermain Extension project to Parrot Contracting, Inc. in the amount of$ 29,314.45. Synopsis Quotes were received on Thursday, August 11, 2011 for the East Staring Lane Watermain Extension project. Three quotes were received and are tabulated as follows: Parrott Contracting, Inc. $29,314.45 G.F. Jedlicki, Inc. $31,377.00 Minger Construction, Inc. $44,630.30 Background Information At the July 19th City Council meeting, a roadway easement vacation was approved contingent upon the property owner granting the city a drainage and utility easement for the purpose of constructing this watermain connection/extension. The easement has been obtained and recorded with Hennepin County. This watermain connection/extension project will provide the Staring Lane neighborhood with a secondary connection, which will create a "looped" system for improved water operations. The low quote of $29,314.45 is 2% lower than the Engineer's estimate of $30,000. The project will be financed by the Water Capital Fund. We expect to complete the project by the end of September 2011. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Agenda 08/16/11 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development/Planning Baneberry Hollow - Settlement Agreement VII. I. Janet Jeremiah/Regina Herron for Grading, Drainage, and Tree Replacement Requested Action Move to: Approve the Settlement Agreement for Baneberry Hollow project. Background Information Baneberry Hollow is a 12 unit townhome project approved by the City on June 20, 2006. On August 17, 2010 the City adopted a resolution declaring Lakewest Holdings, Inc. in default of the Developers and Landscape Agreement for the Heritage Development Project. The City initiated proceeding with a claim against the bond. After the Settlement Agreement is signed Granite Re, Inc will submit a check to the City in the amount of$82,500.00. Attachment Settlement Agreement SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND GRANITE RE,INC. This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Agreement") is made by and between the City of Eden Prairie ("the City") and Granite Re, Inc. ("Granite Re") (hereinafter"the parties"): RECITALS A. Granite Re issued surety bonds for certain work by Lakewest Holdings ("the developer") at the Baneberry Hollow development in Eden Prairie ("the Project"). After default by the developer, the City filed claims under the surety bonds and filed a law suit captioned City of Eden Prairie v. Granite Re, Inc., in Hennepin County District Court, File No. 27- CV-11-2634. ("the Lawsuit") Granite Re denied liability and asserted third-party claims against its principals and indemnitors, Lakewest Holdings, LLC, Lakewest Development Company, LLC, Lakewest Realty, LLC, and Lakewest Construction, LLC, each a Minnesota limited liability company; Curtis J. Fretham, individually; and Karen Fretham, individually(hereinafter referred to collectively as "the indemnitors"). B. Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein below, the City and Granite Re desire to settle all claims alleged, or which could have been alleged, between them in the above-captioned action. C. The parties deem such settlement to be in their respective best interests based upon their investigation of the facts, advice of counsel, and analysis of the legal principles involved. The parties desire to settle in order to avoid the expense of litigation and to put to rest all claims which were alleged or which might have been alleged between them in this action. This settlement does not affect the claims between Granite Re and the indemnitors, which will be handled separately. D. The settlement of the above-described claims and disputes, including all negotiations Ieading to the settlement, the payment of consideration therefore, and the contents of this Agreement, are not intended to constitute and shall not constitute any admission or concession of any kind by the parties as to the claims and disputes between them. The parties hereby acknowledge that they wish fully and finally to compromise and settle the claims and disputes between them. COVENANTS Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: i. Payment Granite Re shall pay the City the sum of Eighty Two Thousand Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($82,500.00) by executing and delivering a check in that amount payable to the City. Such check shall be presented for payment after the City signs this Agreement and returns it to counsel for Granite Re. 2. Release of Claims In consideration of settlement of the Lawsuit, the parties hereto, on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their agents, servants, attorneys, insurers, successors, heirs and assigns, do hereby release and forever discharge, each other, each of their respective past and present officers, directors, shareholders, partners, affiliates, subconsultants, servants, accountants, attorneys, insurers, employees, subsidiaries, divisions, successors, heirs and assigns, from any and all claims, demands, obligations, lawsuits, causes of action, costs, expenses, attorney's fees and liabilities of any nature whatsoever, whether based on contract, tort, statutory or other legal or equitable theory of recovery, whether known or unknown, or any other claim for damages, past,present, or future related to the subject matter of the Lawsuit. 3. Warranty of Authority Each person who executes this Agreement does hereby represent and warrant to each other party hereto that he/she has the authority to do so, and both individually and on behalf of the party for whom executed, agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each other party from any claim that such authority did not exist. 4. Integration Clause This agreement represents and contains the entire agreement and understanding among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes any and all prior oral and written agreements and understandings. No representation, warranty, condition, understanding or agreement of any kind with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement shall be relied upon by the parties. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by an agreement signed by the parties against whom enforcement of any modification or amendment is sought. 5. Representation by Counsel In entering into this Agreement, the parties each acknowledge and represent that they have sought and obtained the legal advice of their attorneys, who are the attorneys of their own choice. They further represent that they have completely read the terms of this Agreement and that they fully understand and voluntarily accept those terms. 2 6. Counterparts This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall be deemed one and the same instrument. 7. Attorney's Fees In the event litigation is necessary to enforce a provision or provisions of this Agreement, all costs, expenses and attorney's fees shall be paid by the non-prevailing party or parties to the prevailing party or parties. The provisions of this Section 7 shall apply if the non-prevailing party has failed to cure a breach of this Agreement within fourteen (14) days after delivery of written notice thereof. 8. Severability Should any portion (word, clause, phrase, sentence, paragraph or section) of this Agreement be declared void or unenforceable, such portion shall be considered independent and severable from the remainder, the validity of which shall remain unaffected. 9. Governing Law This agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, and all obligations of the parties created hereunder are performable in whole or in part in Hennepin County, Minnesota, where venue shall lie for any action brought hereunder. 10. Disclaimer of Liability As the compromise of disputed claims, this settlement is neither an admission of liability nor a statement against the interests of any person or entity. 11. Captions The captions and titles of the various paragraphs in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and in no way define, limit, or prescribe the scope or intent of this Agreement, nor do they in any other way affect the interpretation of this Agreement. 12. Dismissal of City of Eden Prairie The parties shall execute a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice and Order, attached and incorporated herein, dismissing the City of Eden Prairie from the above-referenced cause of action on file with the Hennepin County District Court as File No. 27-CV-11-2634. 3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Dated: , 2011 By: Nancy Tyra-Lukens Its: Mayor Dated: , 2011 By: Rick Getschow Its: City Manager 4 GRANITE RE,INC. Dated; 2011 By: J yc H day Its: Assistant Secretary 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Public Hearings 08/16/2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development/Planning Grand Haven at Marsh Cove VIII. A. Janet Jeremiah/Scott A. Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.5 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space 5.12 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.62 acres, and Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.5 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 11.62 acres into 16 lots, 1 outlot, and right-of- way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and Commission recommendations and Council conditions. Synopsis This is a continued item from the July 19, 2011 City Council meeting. The revised plan has 16 lots. The cul-de-sac has been moved to the north for a total length of 650 feet. The proposed park dedication area has been reduced from 5.38 to 5.12 acres. The number of waivers has been reduced from 40 to 3. Tree loss is the same. The plan provides a trail access outlot. Eleven of the 16 homes have been moved to the 30 foot front yard setback. This leaves more room in the rear yards for additions and decks. It should be required that the homes be built according to the front yard setbacks as shown on the plan. Background Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 have a street frontage waiver. The dedication of the trail access is a tradeoff for the lot frontage waivers. The rear yards along the east side have been increased from a 39 foot minimum setback and a 57 foot average setback to a 39 foot minimum setback and a 76 foot average setback. The rear yards along the west side have been increased from a 44 foot minimum setback and a 50 foot average setback to a 49 foot minimum setback and a 67 foot average setback. City Council Agenda Grand Haven at Marsh Cove August 16, 2011 Page 2 The 120-Day Review Period Expires on September 2, 2011. The developer has submitted an extension letter to September 7, 2011. Staff recommends approval. Attachments 1. Resolution for Guide Plan Amendment 2. Resolution for PUD Concept 3. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 4. Staff Report dated June 10, 2011 5. Location Map 6. Land Use Map 7. Zoning Map 8. Aerial photo 9. Approved Planning Commission Minutes dated June 13, 2011 10. Extension of the review period letter 11. Letter to King of Glory Church 8-2-11 12. Letter from Shawn& Sarah Cheesman 13. Letter from Jeff Schoenwetter dated 8-10-11 GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan("Plan"); and WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS,the proposal of Grand Haven at Marsh Cove,by Marsh Cove, LLC is for a 16 lot single family residential development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.5 acres and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.12 acres. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE FOR MARSH COVE LLC. WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on June 13, 2011 on Grand Haven at Marsh Cove by Marsh Cove, LLC., and considered their request for approval of the PUD Concept plan and recommended approval of the request to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 16, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Grand Haven at Marsh Cove, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans stamp dated August 4, 2011. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission on June 13, 2011. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk EXHIBIT A PUD CONCEPT - Grand Haven at Marsh Cove Legal Description: Lot 17, Block 1, THE FARM 2ND SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE FOR MARSH COVE, LLC. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Grand Haven at Marsh Cove for Marsh Cove, LLC., stamp dated August 4, 2011, and consisting of 11.62 acres into 16 lots and one outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: June 10, 2011 SUBJECT: Grand Haven at Marsh Cove APPLICANT: Marsh Cove, LLC OWNER: King of Glory Lutheran Church LOCATION: 17850 Duck Lake Trail 120 DAY REVIEW: September 2, 2011 REQUEST: 1. Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.21 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres 3. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.62 acres 4. Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres 5. Preliminary Plat of 11.62 acres into 16 lots and 1 outlot Staff Report—Grand Haven at Marsh Cove June 10, 2011 Page 2 BACKGROUND The site is owned by the King of Glory Lutheran Church. The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the 11.62 acre site as a Church land use. Surrounding land uses are Park/Open Space to the north and Low Density Residential to the east, west and south. The site is zoned Public. Surrounding zoning is Public to the north, R1-13.5 single family to the east and west, and R1-22 single family to the south. GUIDE PLAN CHANGE The applicant is requesting a Guide Plan change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.21 acres. A change in land use to Low Density Residential, and Parks/Open space would be consistent with the land use patterns in the area. Leaving the site guided as Church would also be compatible. As a church, the site does have capacity for a larger building of 82,000 sq. ft., a 600 seat sanctuary, and 200 parking spaces. PRELIMINARY PLAT This preliminary plat shows 16 single-family lots, and one outlot for the pond and wetlands. Outlot A will be dedicated to the City. PURPOSE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND WAIVERS The purpose of a Planned Unit Development is to: (1) Encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land in the City; (2)Allow variety in the types of environment available to the people of the City; (3) Encourage more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled common open space through the distribution of overall density of population and intensity of land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible; and, (4) Provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 12 (relating to subdivisions) of this Code while at the same time preserving the health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare of the City and its inhabitants. Historically, planned unit development waivers have been used to result in a plan that benefits the City. In the 70's the City used PUD waivers as a means to protect environmental features such as wetlands, lakes, creeks, steep slopes, flood plain, and trees. In the 80's and 90's the City adopted a Shoreland Ordinance, Steep Slope Ordinance, Floodplain Ordinance, Tree Ordinance and Wetland Ordinance to protect these features. Staff Report—Grand Haven at Marsh Cove June 10, 2011 Page 3 In the 90's and 2000's the City used PUD waivers to create senior affordable housing, eliminate incompatible land uses, create affordable housing, and to develop the Town Center. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The project requires 40 Planned Unit Development (PUD) waivers from the City code related to lot size, lot width, street frontage, setbacks, and cul-de-sac length. The proposed PUD waivers are as follows: • Lot Size - Eight lots are less than 13,500 sq. ft. • Lot Width—Four lots are less than 85 ft. • Lot Frontage—Ten lots have frontage on the street less than 85 ft., 55 ft. on the radius of the cul-de- sac. • Front Yard Setback—Three lots have less than a 30 ft. front setback • Side Yard Setbacks — Fourteen lots have less than 10 ft side yard//total 25 ft. both combined. • Cul-de-sac Length—Exceeds 500 ft The applicant is asking for waivers is to create a different street appearance and to create views of the wetlands. The smaller street frontages combined with houses setbacks greater than the 30 foot minimum reduces the back yard space. Proposed homes along the east side are at a 39 foot minimum setback and a 57 foot average setback. In the subdivision to the east, existing homes are at a 15 foot minimum setback and a 85 foot average setback. Proposed homes along the west side are at a 44 foot minimum setback and a 50 foot average setback. In the subdivision to the west, existing homes are at a 48 foot minimum setback and a 70 foot average setback. The waivers do not result in a plan that provides a benefit to the City and creates a visual impact on existing homes to the east and west. GRADING AND TREE LOSS The tree inventory shows a total of 750 diameter inches of significant trees on the property. A total of 242 diameter inches, or 32%will be lost due to grading for road, house pads, and drainage. Tree replacement is 104 caliper inches, or 35, three caliper inch trees. The tree replacement plan meets this requirement. Staff Report—Grand Haven at Marsh Cove June 10, 2011 Page 4 DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES Drainage will be directed to the infiltration pond on the north end of the site through drainage swales and storm sewer. City sewer and water is available to the property. EDENBROOK CONSERVATION AREA There is a 200+acre city owned conservation area that abuts the proposed Grand Haven development. The area is named the Edenbrook Conservation Area(ECA) and recently several soft surface trails and boardwalk sections have been constructed to enable residents to enjoy this unique nature area. The trail/boardwalk system was constructed after a lengthy planning process, which involved 15 residents living in close proximity to the ECA. Two additional conservation areas (Riley Creek Woods and Lower Purgatory Creek) were also studied for trail development at the same time. A master plan for these three conservation areas was presented to the City Council in the fall of 2005. Each of the three areas had specific recommendations regarding trail development in phases. During the public meetings it was mentioned that most of the residents who live on the south side of the conservation area entered through the King of Glory Church property. As a result a recommendation was made to seek a public access point through the church property if or when there was an opportunity to develop a public access to connect to the trail network. This single family development provides that access opportunity. The developer has provided an outlot for a trail connection on the north end of the cul-de-sac. The developer is required to blacktop pave an eight foot wide trail from the road access location to a point where the lawn areas on either side become natural or to a point mutually agreed upon by city staff and the developer. The City will install a sign indicating that the trail is for foot traffic only—no bicycles or motorized vehicles permitted. The city will not remove snow from the trail during the winter months. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ALTERNATIVE ONE Recommend approval of the following request: 1. Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.21 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres 3. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.62 acres 4. Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres 5. Preliminary Plat of 11.62 acres into 16 lots and 1 outlot This is based on plans stamp dated June 9, 2011 the Staff Report dated June 10, 2011 and the following conditions: Staff Report-Grand Haven at Marsh Cove June 10, 2011 Page 5 1. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Pay all City sewer and water assessment and connection fees. C. Dedicate Outlot A to the City. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the grading limits in the wooded areas for trees to be preserved as part of the development. Said fencing shall be field inspected by the City Forester prior to any grading. 3. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the proponent shall: A. Submit a tree replacement bond/letter of credit for review and approval. B. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. 4. The following waivers are granted through the PUD for the project as indicated in the approved plans: Lot Size-Less than 13,500 sq. ft. for Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, Block 1; Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, Block 2. Lot Width-Less than 85 feet, 90 for corner lots for Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 2. Lot Frontage-Less than 85 feet, 55 feet on the cul-de-sac radius, for Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, Block 1; Lots 1, 6, 7, 8, Block 2. Front Setback-Less than 30 feet for Lots 1, 7, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2. Side Setback- Less than 10 ft one side/total 25 ft. both combined for Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Block 1; Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Block 2. Cul-de-sac Length-Exceeds 500 ft ALTERNATIVE TWO Recommend a continuance to the July 11, 2011 meeting with direction to revise the plan to conform to City code requirements. Staff recommends Alternative Two. Area Location Map - Grand Haven at Marsh Cove Address: 17850 Duck Lake Trail v W 66TH ST V Boyd Avenue SITE A* ---- ika _ _________ _.,_ _.„_-_- - Lorena Lane - 1011 J >y../7„.„------mvik 1 / ' ;, Duck Lake Trail /'/4,1 °Is. . 4' N / IM glill ' ..., k 1 1. Ailia- iiiiistai.. Fe= _.b % In .�-11.1■i�isi�r Guide Plan Map Grand Haven at Marsh Cove 17850 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie, MN IIL Pg1 Alit )ti � II IN/ Uli S;1 1 Ilr--. la I 111 ; t Boyd Avenue l tirIII/ ♦ • _ - w Lorena Lane a JUU_____ IIIIEII - - - - -- _ _ _ IIIior ....„ - _ 4 iii, ____ , r - - - - - sli _ .... ___ . �'* / , , . Duck Lake Trail , i *latigiliV > /lititikndialtri Wr7:117,47. 0,!-1 -2__ __ _ _ 4. N /4--------------,MEW Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre Neighborhood Commercial N Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre Community Commercial Streams Low Density/Public/Open Space - Regional Commercial Principal Arterial Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre EaTown Center —A Minor Arterial —B Minor Arterial � � I Medium DensityResidential/Office Park/Open Space DATE Approved DATE Revised 03-01-07 � P P DATE Revised 01-07-05 DATE Revised 03-01-07 Major Collector DATE Revised 11-07-05 DATE Revised 06-01-07 EDEN F High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre Public/Quasi-Public DATE Revised 02-23-06 DATE Revised 10-01-07 Minor Collector02 DATE Revised 03-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-08 11 Airport Golf Course DATE Revised 06-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-09 PRAIRIE Office � Church/Cemetary 7 Office/Industrial Open Water LIVE•WORK•DREAM V// Office/Public/Open Space Right-Of-Way """""`"°°" °""®°�""°"°" °" •"°•-°-""F_" " _ ®° - Industrial 0.25 0.125 0 I 1 Miles Zoning Map Grand Haven at Marsh Cove 17850 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie MN ir inomosil Ir.„Iwo 111 4Ithll Illippley Boyd Av 1/4 II Ptal lirA III 001,0ri p rWr AlE LI !renaLaneii ill IIIIIIIIIIIIII pirk be 111 ildi), op" • 111 a ir 0 or 0 si 11111, OPP do" rat 11111111101 Duck Lake Trail NA 1 1 r1 1 1`1 Avila 0111" IP' UM rre"'a' IIN RN NE 111116.4 Ape Rural -Regional Commercial Shoreland Management Classifications N R1-44 One Family-44,000 sf.min. I TC-C I NE I Natural Environment Waters R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. n TC-R I RD I Recreational Development WatersA IN I,' 11 R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. ji TC-MU I GD I General Development Waters(Creeks Only) R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. Industrial Park-2 Acre Min, ® 100- Year Floodplain EDEN RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A.max. En Industrial Park- 5 Acre Min. Up dated through approved Ordinances#26-2008 -RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A.max. General Industrial-5 Acre Min. Ordinance#33-2001(BFI Addition)approved,but not shown on this map edition PRAIRIE Office J Public Date:March 1,2009 Neighborhood Commercial I Golf Course mcaaemaiacapency rearearoa:omny claaanmaaon on nia:omny map,neommance LIVE•WORK•DREAM and attached legal Gescnption on file at Eden Paine Ciry Center will prevail. -Community Commercial Water -Highway Commercial Right of Way 0 0.1 0.2 -Regional Service Commercial Miles .wa,_o...m..=m._..®..g..o.,.,, ..,_..a.0... ,..,,mo, Aerial Map Grand Haven at Marsh Creek 17850 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie, MN ' _, r a rte. P . ' . i� � ? . • , ., - 1a „ _ r j t s - Ili Set r ' �} SITE1** / `A J • / \ ------1- Boyd Avenue 111 ill' ' ',..).'.' -,.,, -ipp:4 : . - . ' tr., all , . . .. i,;:., Lorena Lanelid ,� I, ... , , ,. r• IIIIII„it' _ . ,,./: .0' ' ii tr, • - cr ei , ,.L. ...,.. ' , ' . : UMW .. .4i... I -al-- Fit# 1 1 I t-- -11111ppi 0 ipik--- ,,, L'4. iijt 4.y, � ® � Duck Lake Trail 441'�— rw APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY,JUNE 13, 2011 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: Matt Fyten, John Kirk, Katie Lechelt, Jacob Lee, Jerry Pitzrick, Kevin Schultz, Jon Stoltz, Travis Wuttke STAFF MEMBERS: Michael Franzen, City Planner Rod Rue, City Engineer Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Julie Krull, Recording Secretary I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE—ROLL CALL Chair Stoltz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Pitzrick and Wuttke were absent. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION by Schultz, seconded by Lee, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 6-0. III. MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MAY 23, 2011 MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Fyten, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 4-0. Lechelt and Schultz abstained. IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS V. PUBLIC MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. GRAND HAVEN AT MARSH COVE by Marsh Cove, LLC. Location: 17850 Duck Lake Trail Request for: • Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.21 EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 13, 2011 Page 2 • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 11.62 acres • Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres • Preliminary Plat of 11.62 acres into 16 lots and 1 outlot Jeff Schoenwetter, 5250 West 74th Street, Suite 8, Edina, MN, gave the history of the project. He stated this project is north of Duck Lake Trail and south of Edenbrook. Mr. Schoenwetter pointed out the 3 acre park on the property is important to development and will be preserved. In looking at geometry of how each home is set up it is unique. He pointed out they wanted to come up with something that would create a difference and that is how the 11 acres are to be developed. Their goal is to create more of a green neighborhood. They are also giving 27% of the land for park dedication. Mr. Schoenwetter pointed out the homes that would ultimately be built would be a little bit smaller than what is stated in the plan. By setting up homes at a slight angle and a curved road, it will create view corridors. Another idea they are looking at is community lighting; which can be done by putting up 300 watts on the garage on solar cell and having them all come on in the evening at the same time. They are also creating a pathway or trail on the property, and planting more pine trees and significantly more shade trees, which will improve air quality. In regards to water, they are building a pond and will also have city water in these homes. Rick Harrison also spoke on behalf of the project. He stated the reason for the PUD is to create something special for people living in the neighborhood. Many of the lots are very deep. Because they want to create these different shapes of the lots, they have to be free of grid. The lots are not the typical rectangular shapes. This cannot be done with a standard PUD. When looking at side yards, none of these homes are parallel. He utilized the overhead projector to show visualization of the property. In looking down the street, it is a very open area and ultimately leads to the park. He showed the different views from homes in the area and the park. The intent with this plan is to be creative and efficient and stated it cannot be done without a PUD, and it is needed to put these mechanisms in place. Stoltz asked Franzen to review the staff report. Franzen said the commission has two decisions, what should the property be used for, a church or single family homes; and what plan should be approved, a conforming plan or a plan with waivers. Franzen talked about the reasons the City used for granting waivers in the past and the impact of granting the waivers on the adjoining properties. When homes are setback farther in the lot it reduces the back yard area to the homes in the subdivision to the east and west of the site. Franzen indicated the options in the staff report for approval as submitted and a continuance with direction to revise the plans to meet code. He pointed out low density is fine,but the best fit for a neighborhood is to have a conforming project. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 13, 2011 Page 3 Kirk asked what changes Franzen would look at to make it conforming. Franzen said they would go straight by the ordinance for setbacks. Lechelt asked if this project would create a stronger tax base for the City. Franzen any development of land will have an impact on the tax base, but because the project is small it would not be that much of a difference. Lechelt asked if there were any other conforming projects coming forward. Franzen stated the Rogers Development is a conforming project and is in, but not on the schedule. Mr. Schoenwetter commented they feel the design of the project would better the neighborhood. Mr. Harrison asked if they should limit the views and have a big piece of concrete at the end of the development or make it a more appealing neighborhood. He stated it's all about character. Fyten asked Franzen if this PUD request was excessive to what has been granted in the past. Franzen stated proportionately to the size of the property and number of units, the plan has a lot of waivers. Lechelt asked the project proponent if there had been any interest in the property. Mr. Schoenwetter stated several people have expressed interest and would like to reserve a spot and two are actually from the existing neighborhood. Lechelt stated this is a good project and likes the new ideas to this project. Schultz asked Franzen if he had any dialog with the City in regards to storm water run-off and infiltration. Franzen stated that the plans conceptually meet the requirements, the conditions in this staff report are related to construction drawings requiring an approval before a permit is issued. Schultz stated he feels there is a lot the project proponent could conform to in regards to City standards and would be more inclined for a continuance. Kirk asked if there was a neighborhood meeting and if so, was there any feedback. Franzen said the neighborhood meeting was held several months ago and the reaction was mixed. Schultz said he has a concern with how far the houses are sitting back and how it affects the surrounding neighbors. Lee asked if they conform to the backyard setbacks. Schoenwetter commented they do comply with the backyard setback. Lechelt asked if there were any traffic concerns with this new development. Rue said there were no traffic concerns. Stoltz opened the meeting up for public input. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 13, 2011 Page 4 Barbara Chacko, of 6722 Boyd Avenue, which is east of the project, stated the developer did a nice job with the presentation at the public meeting and the only concern she has with it, is with the views and setbacks,but feels it is a much better idea than if there was a church in the area. She said she is also happy with the wetland setback and pointed out the design is lovely, but she is also concerned with the current views she has. Stoltz asked if she was in favor of the project. Mrs. Chasko said it was a lovely plan. Mr. Chacko, of 6722 Boyd Avenue, said his concern is a general one. He asked, with this big development, 3 years down the road, are we going to lose more natural area to this land. He stated he wants to make sure it stays the way it is. Stoltz asked City Staff if they had a comment. Rue said there is a pond and buffer designed in the area. Mr. Schoenwetter pointed out again that this site is dedicating 3 acres to the City. Brian Christofis, of the design team, said there is a 40 foot buffer they will maintained and in regards to the rear yard setbacks, their intent is to preserve almost all of the boundary trees. Lechelt asked if the pond that would be created is a nurp or infiltration pond. Rue said it would be a nurp pond. Lechelt asked about storm water and what is put in place for this. Rue said they have met the standards for this but would work closer with the project proponent as the project develops. Stoltz asked Fyten what his thought were in regards to this project. Fyten said even though there are a lot of waivers, they do not seem too high and because of that, doesn't have a huge concern with it and feels it is a nice plan. Stoltz asked Franzen how long they have been talking with the project proponent. Franzen stated they have been talking with them for months. Stoltz asked if the City had more time could this become more of a conforming project. Franzen stated even if there was more time it would not change Staff's position or the project proponent's position. Lisa Rebeck, of 17724 Duck Lake Trail, said she is concerned with the stress of traffic coming into the area with all of the development and said she is not in favor of this project. Barbara Chacko asked a clarifying question; is this going to be open public space or private park space. She stated the hill has been used for sledding in the neighborhood and even though developers stated that access would be open, she is concerned about the park area. Franzen stated the park area would be City owned. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 13, 2011 Page 5 John Goergen, of 6805 Lorena Lane, said he is in favor of having this residential unit in the neighborhood. In regards to the pond, he said when he moved in 23 years ago, there was a much bigger pond in the area. If it is maintained, it would be nice. Stoltz asked if he was in favor of the project. Mr. Goergen said he was in favor of the project. Carli Richards, of 6758 Boyd Avenue, which is southwest of the property stated with this development they will have a house behind them. She stated she would feel more comfortable if this project was more conforming. She also said she does not understand placements of homes and does not want to see a home go up behind her home. Stoltz asked Franzen to talk about property values. Franzen stated property values are not a code requirement. When developing properties developers will build to what the market dictates. Stoltz asked the project proponent what the average price of homes in the area would be. Mr. Schoenwetter said Franzen is correct, market value does dictate price. Currently they would be around $400,000 - $800,000 price range. Mr. Schoenwetter thanked everyone for coming out tonight and all the help City Staff has given him. Lechelt asked the project proponent about the homes behind homes in the Boyd area; are they back to back with new homes. Mr. Harrison utilized the overhead projector to show the backyard development. Stoltz asked Kirk what his thoughts were in regards to this project. Kirk said he supports single family homes and although the waivers are there, they do not seem to be a problem and he is in favor of the project. Schultz stated he has no problem with usage of development. His main concern was how this development would integrate with the neighborhoods around them. He stated since there was not that much opposition tonight, he would rescind his continuation. Lisa Rebeck is concerned with their house being built in the 1980's and then these brand new homes are going up. Lisa Johnson, of 6806 Boyd Avenue, wanted to comment she is concerned about the setbacks and how they will affect the views of the last four homes on Boyd Avenue. MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Schultz, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 13, 2011 Page 6 MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Fyten, to recommend approval of the Guide Plan Change from Church to Low Density Residential on 6.41 acres, and from Church to Park/Open Space on 5.21, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.62 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.62 acres, Zoning District Change from Public to R1-13.5 on 6.41 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 11.62 acres based on plans stamped dated June 9, 2011 and the staff report dated June 10, 2011. Motion carried 6-0. There was a five minute break in the meeting. Commissioner Schultz left at this time. VII. PLANNERS' REPORT Franzen stated there will be three public hearings at the next Planning Commission Meeting on June 27, 2011. VIII. MEMBERS' REPORT IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Lee, seconded by Kirk, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. MS JMS Custom Homes, LLC "The sensible way to build" August 4, 2011 Michael D. Franzen City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Grand Haven at Marsh Cove 120 day review period extension Dear Mr. Franzen, I am requesting that the 120 review period for the Grand Haven at Marsh Cove be extended to September 7, 2011. Sincerely, '7/1-7 C\ Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter, CEO JMS Custom Homes, LLC 5250 West 74th Street• Suite 8 • Edina, MN 55439 • 952-949-3630 try August 2,2011 PRAIRI Ellis W. Olson ,LimE INDRk•PHA King of Glory Church 17850 Duck Lake Trail OFC 952 949 8300 FAX 952 949 8390 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 7Dd 952 949 8399 8080 Mitchell Rd Eden Prairie,MN 55344-4485 Subject: Grand Haven at Marsh Cove edenprairie.org Dear Mr. Olson: On behalf of the Eden Prairie City Council, I would like to reply to your letter of July 22, 2011. Since we have been in discussions with the developer in recent days, I wanted to wait for the best opportunity to provide a full update for you and your congregation. I want to assure you that we have been actively working with the JMS Custom Homes,LLC since we were first approached by them with their plan to develop single-family homes on the King of Glory Lutheran Church property. Early in the process,we asked the developer to hold a neighborhood meeting so that residents could see the plans in advance of the necessary public hearings. Typically, a neighborhood meeting serves a purpose of introducing the developer and the plan to the community. The expectation is that neighbors would provide input so any changes could be incorporated into the plans before the public hearing process starts. Our experience has been that some residents will comment at those meetings,but others will reserve judgment until they see the final plan and staff report at a Planning Commission and/or City Council meeting. In this case,the public hearing comments at the Planning Commission meeting on June 20 raised some concerns about views,traffic,wetland impacts,property values and setbacks to the adjoining neighborhoods. Even though the planning staff recommendation was to not grant all. of the requested waivers,the Commission voted to move the project forward to the Council. The City Council then held a subsequent public hearing on July 19. This provided another opportunity for residents to comment on the project. In this case,the City Council did not approve the waivers at the meeting and asked the developer to revise their plan and return to the next scheduled City Council meeting. Grand Haven at Marsh Cove Page 2 Since that Council meeting, city planning staff has met with the developer to find the best plan that would meet the concerns of the City Council and the neighborhood. The developer has indicated that a revised plan would be submitted for City review by the end of this week for consideration at the August 16 Council meeting. We truly appreciate receiving your feedback and hope this update is useful for you. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns that you may have. Sincerely, t. Rick Getschow City Manager cc:Eden Prairie Mayor and City Council August 9, 2011 To: Mayor Nancy Tyra-Lukens and fellow City Council Members RE: New Plot Proposal for Grand Haven at Marsh Cove We are glad to see a new plot proposal prepared by the developer that fits better with the existing neighborhoods and conforms better to city guidelines! We sat down with the City Planner's office to review the new plan on Monday,August 8 and were pleased with what we saw and heard. As representatives of 61 neighbors that authorized us to speak on their behalf,we want to provide our input on the new proposal. At the July 19th meeting, we presented our concerns and our desired outcomes. We have copied those desired outcomes below: Desired Outcomes • Allow change of use from Church to single family homes • REJECT developers plan and request a new plan be prepared that meets city guidelines. This is supported by 59 neighbors surrounding the proposed development. • Request developer to prepare a plan that fits with existing neighborhoods and allows for large back yards • Request developer to consider how evergreens can be preserved in new plan. • Allow one waiver for length of cul-de-sac to exceed city guideline of 500' We believe the following is the progress made with the new proposal: • Continued change of use from church to single family homes (R1-13.5) • Significant progress in the reduction of waivers requested from 40 to less than 5 • New plot plan allows for a curved street and moves homes closer to the street near the 30' curb setback guideline. This creates larger backyards. Lots 1,2,3 in block 1 and lots 1 and 2 in block 2 are deeper than 30'from the curb. • There are no apparent changes to the plan to try to preserve the 30 year old, 30 foot tall evergreens. • The cul-de-sac, street length, is even longer in this new plan. We accept that change. Page 1 We have the following comments and suggestions for the proposed development: 1. Councilman Case had previously identified that the new homes on lots 1 &2, block 2 had no buffer behind it like most others around the property. He asked the developer to consider adding trees to the back of that property to provide a natural barrier. The backyards of these lots backs up to the side yard of the home behind it. Thus, there is less distance between the homes. We think it is important to add these trees for two reasons a) The new plot plan has lots 1 and 2 more than 30'from the curb. This reduces the buffer from the new homes and the existing home behind it. b) All other homes on the Boyd Avenue side, block 2, have existing coniferous trees in-between the two properties. Adding trees here will make it more consistent. If the developer is willing to add these trees as a buffer, we are willing to accept the deeper home placement on these lots. If the developer is unwilling to add trees, then we will insist that the homes be placed at the standard 30' setback from the curb. 2. Lots 1, 2, 3 in block 1 are deep. We are thus willing to accept having the homes placement greater than 30'from the curb as proposed. 3. We recognize the efforts the developer has made to increase the size of the backyards to fit in better with the existing neighborhoods. We are willing to accept the variations from the 30'setback from the curb in lots 1,2,3 block 1 and lots 1,2 in block 2 if the developer is a) willing to add trees as described in item 1 above and b) able to commit that NO home will be built to exceed the front setbacks drawn in the plan. 4. While we understand the developer is compliant with the tree replacement program,we would still like the developer to consider what can be done to preserve as many of the 30 year old, 30 foot tall coniferous trees that are planned for removal. 5. If all items above are met, we are willing to accept the waivers required for front lot width as proposed in the plot plan. As we understand the plan,these are the only waivers required other than street length. Once again,we are pleased that the developer has made such significant changes to the plot plan to fit better with the existing neighborhoods. Mayor Tyra-Lukens said in the last council meeting, "I would also like to encourage more communication between the neighborhood group and the builder." We are disappointed that the developer has not reached out to us or the neighbors to discuss what changes have been made to address the concerns of the neighbors and those of the city council. We never heard a word from the developer. We have taken it upon ourselves as representatives for those 61 neighbors to educate ourselves on what changes have been made to the plan and how they meet the concerns we presented as well as those of the city council. We thought this was the easiest means to share our thoughts prior to the city council meeting on 8/16. We plan to do the same at the August City Council meeting. If you have any questions, please let us know. Shawn &Sarah Cheesman 6782 Boyd Avenue _.._._.........._.... ......_..._._._.__..—......._._.._....__..._.. Page 2 MS JMS Custom Homes, LLC "The sensible way to build" August 11, 2011 Michael D. Franzen City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Grand Haven at Marsh Cove Dear Mr. Franzen, Just wanted to follow-up on our conversation from the other day. I greatly appreciate the call and your genuine interest in getting the propct to co mpletion at Marsh Cove. Per our discussion, I have attached a few photos as an example of the possible type of screening we could use excluding rockand fence) Wis type of screening would exceed the requirements of the City. We would expect to do approximately 8 12 large blacl4ills spruce or similar pine trees (12' 15'tall)and a row of approximately 16 -24 arborvitaes ell along DuclLaIR Wail and on t he bacl€ide of lots 1 82, ®clf2) Sincerely, Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter, CEO JMS Custom Homes, LLC 5250 West 74th Street• Suite 8 • Edina, MN 55439 • 952-949-3630 I • • 1 f�E f- _le sip ' • \ fire' 11 1 - • • ^ lam•' ,.. d,. . / a. rm • 411? $4-.. 10aid t;.;{ - 4t •t• 1 1 • e ,_ •T t - ;,- • ', �` ems` w ': , 7ii • ` • _ _. - ,_ - _ `�3 _'ter` . '_ - - - - ��.• and + ,5�,• IV• II •t ♦a - ` _` -i �� �i _ mr • �i -'`• � - r \, y y .�� ` -• • I � �_ - -7:.��- r� m I n /�� jur 4. • / -. - _ _ < caw.-f. . ' - �- e •— �� ♦ ' svr ' _- - .,,1.\ +Al ' •3/4 {f . ►• �'�'��- rr :Alginate,• `. $r4• • P 11 r \' _ tr y L r,r-c01.- ^ r` 70'`�` 1• C ..1* . ` . 1 '.'1'- Afar • / '` - ... _ • ' _ �-, > .. - •,,i= • . a/`'. '+, c.-, w • '�' j `. • `• -.. .;• ', � 1 • f;�+ / 'r� - -•.,` • � • . ` � -� •� ! Sr '\ may . . t► s-7 � -.. `akilit - 4p I CV 44 all `� � . r1 ,1 . a '►. •• hp, Tv ` yT Ilk ii /r • y • t . . r+ • 1. •446 iLiopr atirsa % ili e� '♦'� ••'. ,` . _•• - dr ' - �' _ ii;. -r- 'jy�Y I I 4..._,` lit\ _ �� • �� al . �, �I '1 �4 ��Lr _ �1�"'•_ - _ - r._� -_� • • , �� •?a�� iJA e •-• J•� I / �� _ `� •t� A• ear•,.. ! -� r e • �•• •• ♦ � .r _ �• 1 V ,1;/• <.•'� - 1'lir �- v `—_ - - \� - iii... .it • •'••' ai ,• 1 --' '% / 1'•'_ fAr ^ • tar I" 3/4 - - ♦:� J1 . - -- `ram' -- t1gib i ' -•� •\.1 •-� �} - 1 y . ' • l _ _ _ _. Y - �\ 1 . r• - / c. bill 2111" 1r1', `11.‘�� � .f� ♦ • � ' • .f. (• .^ _ - \ ��� •��\, �'L., J/' - ' � � � . , f • �'- 1 J r�v .- `='r. • r _ _ t ___ `.� �_ 'I 7 -• it '' •:� ' / '�4". ' = • k. ,... ,...... VAI i. • • ' _ ro• • VitailLId • • • = �r��`/ �f7 !t : ' ; % ir- •,.`: ./� �/I dal "Ku 1 -as 40 +i/•'- . � . �/ 11 • 1 �.+. - • ?� v~ ;!'. N. Sf. r.. . a _ .•• /� - %s - =_ ' -- --- — _ kA�J'•_]C. r � - a .•* 6 .�7. • • Vic Cilif Jilt-rt. - ' - ---- •"- . ..• - Xi.," - -114C' -', ' - ' '''': ' ta. - . , ,..,01111001.- -.. Alial Alfr-• - ‘4r-irojapp 4.0!)hr, . 'IP . • ••sli 1.4 • • /le . ''. a":141111S i - • • inp . rillillril . . ,.. • 'w - I • • i •4011: • ••• tit% 44 Rit. i lige .. ... 1lk*rr. _ i ,1 ..:: 1 re., ,'•---:j:C\ - • ✓ ' _ ` i � . . sait' _ hv. f f :�1 rr • • 'sue~. • _ ` • _'". . -• `� i•' itmillti- • • y1 r •j JJ , S+- I'. ! I R'" • fil q ► f_ , _ • `I , � ;; +Y .,."• , 4 „I: . ,�, �'t 7 . j.. t *.•, - 01 ^ -,...., • 1 _, - " �= ° li -` ` v _ 'Ali�� .' , A. •111� I C. trR ir.• 1t- _ - 3 ..Q" mil 1 •= o• . •• t+./ •^' ' ' - - 1 i• - T ( - - S '.�'4 ',✓>•. - - -.7Or ° +2 iica, .� - 't . , " r .-• • � .. � 11 ,d'e -3 �',/y . ti Y-r ' /� ) . tom.° r i\ r� . a. - _,-J 11(�(, ' • • ♦ f •. Jy lA �' r ` I ^ ��,' ,� •_� .� . t _ • r \ •\ ••1 • 1 - /" .~-� ♦ 4. is ' _ _ - > - j. / . . 1 �, • _ •_ . �.a� ••/ • r� .�.i ` '1 ••r!n•. _ -a � - - � `t\ � 1 -� de r`�. - 1 � e . iZr.I� - 1 • :��.- -• : - "�► -!.. �( ` - y ». ,,, 'rr i - - _ , "-) • - f . -Oft. %' / _ _ipille rr . ♦ - ����+ ' III •t ,r • • * a .. } ��. mil►, 1 ::��� - :} '\y f fl•• - '•' _ - i - - r .' I a nP‘ Ilk__ • ~ •) \. •• - t. Lc )• .�it t. ' . 1. . .• r � R ` 1 . ->. ` r • / - �• - _ _ 1 • 1 y (� sT • fit ' -�! ` - -('�,•i /' f'. • t• s, � !- M . .y I ..Q• .� • - _ - �' s. . r . "•6 •Yl d i � ,l•�. - _� • \}I• • .•l•1 r � ' . I _ '._�• -; ,_`J[ 1 . `� /" . fitr i f 1 � ' I T'�: - -�. tis( _ + �t ' . - a� "Ir.,� ^I -. - �,. .i 'J . `� ;\' � a f-- lit re - - •t�. ; mil- . ` } � r✓ _ .j 71�_•1 _ _ •_ -_ - 1 1 lr y;, - / .•�'r. •` J y, � C I �'� J. � '-q'r• .' 'y % -- - d.r :!- . .,� .f: - . •11r, • •✓... •\ Ab - • �.t' '\ Cl - •' i. r -i - _ �' . , .•. ,'f ,�_ ,• •.. �.1 r : .1 _ _ r c.� _ _ _ .�, �l 6� ram - _ ♦r �- ' sue- /' : � Jy lr•°•• JR , * - -`'1 ♦ ;Y - _ -� ,n _ f) \ . . 1 - _ ..t 1 _ i, .- _ _' 7--i " - �'•` ="' -- . '� i /�! ' -' •' ,� t e} _ ..y Ir. le. ^ r • - ,. i _ • !C _ `\ 1 . •t a •�1 . ,t, . L'� �� 'aj�_ 1► •� f • •. �'� . I Ilk fir" I . 1. . ... C. r ,tom }. � , _ _ _ .:J�!- !' �J .• .�^1F' t � �,• fi �•�,_ ' ; �" - : r • C --- •a - ` " _ :T' .:.1'1. . '''!��� w-- - . - ( am . • ' , :- .r It /- - ^.•iPy +•1# , *.\ t. Ma, y °+'11e -Oa, s-/r= . ."' _• - - S .t . � Cr �, . . : i -7!�_. '^;Y- mot y ' _ 1 - a ^ c� . . - • _ -i } -�£ _ / 3• . , '. '�1'•�\ i,�,.-. i1I^ _ A .� :r•- . '.+ . t . ��. 1 ' ��. -c..••�� t i/ . /j. r IF • ,!,y �. i . .`. �'.. i. - - . rj .�• _ - .r • y ✓ I i -t ! , i ♦a :• sr" �,' p t : :S - , j�()�.•M1jJ:'., ."•J� !���}j Y�/,r•1�' • _ •. `r . •l{ 1 ;I ? •] . r�-. ••� t! . .•� _- 4r II 1Qi \ + .ale` L-i. ! r 1� '�•^1 •'H� Y.'"• i_ .�_ _�• `- , tI. _ 4f�� �y��./� •A• ? _-J .� 11fr �: — a_. -• J - - a' - ' - � -" �� _ ,• -- . _ i •'i -w ' } .• i �t" !+• •Q� r •. .- .\r r^, - �"•ty -41_ ��� �' 1 �s'�"4 .� ' i �[ 7 ;�• \ "!^ � . (\. A / 1 1 i 1 � t ,�. .!1 y �L� ' .� -`i. _ 1 `� i .1..�� `� _ ���' a.• '� ,- . 'A `' j! •' i - F �r * S_ :3 p . � e` < ►3 - ti- y .� { �,/ L< �•.q_ . 1 , ` I , 1\ i d X i ' 'v ? i J .,� , _ a` �— . i �ytl 1 ; L �. 1 •`3 `• /' ( i • -"1 • '.i 1 :� .Z.: -• 'i• , • • .•�+ • -. • !/ SC % - A •a ,{ 4. r r ( - .rt. / f 7 -r [ f \ 1. • ) I' / , <r % t .t I. f ./ . . r. ,r'('ri - a.- �t �� ' ‘IIZil .fir♦/��J✓ - 't � ' ' ' 1 , �• ` • . . � / 1 - 11. , - • >- • I- _ . / ` ~ 1 NitF . �^ 4r- '•'•. 1 i / %G Lt r� ..` V ' - • ✓?"h/� , ••r I �"4` , • . •- , _ A Na � i t S • i- '[ .r- _ 1 .1 • a^ r , / . I R- I• �•�\ I_ • ,, / s ( 'ijl 1 l\ • :0? i J V •!,s'1,+ - _ V• t its \ ' ` , 4 \ r �' ' 1 - ���jjj...... +� ��+ ♦ el '‘• 11 • rr1 / '� • j t '.-i' Fs,/ e " e y J �- a ^'� . _ r... _. �-�� ' - -f , 1 -ej . DIY:. •:. + r ` �-�.. •_ ti� i, +!' ; irJ .r ` ,l. - �'- 4 re - 1:- r - ' r • I/r��yj;(1.6C f 11 •�. . i. 1�ry% �. l ' . e .a ��1�!�� _ t r / , r r r s 1 \ ,.,;r .��r�},( ^v S r �• 4 ` 1 - }�. 'rti.r f S� • -i-• ! , •� a i �' • .Y l 1 'I , �( r •I• . •\!•/P - 1,• [L'C ` 1 ` '1 t ,jam iT ' J - aI l �\ •. -••j.; �� a•; ♦ 1• I.. tort. . - .� \y �11 i 4'' • •• l kilY 1 i1 ' ice - �+ A' ! '� ) _ /N tr. .• j +' . ; ! 1 rp 1 w ♦ _ 1 , t I i yy i /.< r� illt tl Y••: . + /- ' I 1l ' .� 1 �' « ��r. i. .r .• i �` J t . ` i � 1 • • 1 t4 I'y e y�p+ T •/ .,r..,••• ,."' t1t !:{ yr �.o Z '•• . ♦, r t "'_—_ 7. 1 t - n� 1r i { c J .T r' :•.� \ •tit:. . C� r 1"' ... ��q Y. _ �If , •~ �-. ; . . r'1 • f T41S . t-" ;' g '� , ;, r: +, • i► : �T- L, 1•s ' ••' or ', • s . t` ► ' ,"L ` jr" ` , r :, ' •:-•� - t�'' r f M t - - / _ a i t. • r, i ' _ ♦ • f ��✓'� _ • nt \ r. - ♦ • iI l + l 6 Jr `'a - ► rk •'s ,� )� �K' j1 ei � � • mil' lik ir •t• '� - %' .• / ) .II r` 1 _ "� !1 i 1 1t {k ,, f: - `'I - �,-! � .> ♦ � �i . T :• r/ ♦ {� , -`• , ••� l?I (+ s • 1 k I ' .� a'T • 1 ".•11G' �y 's I ' 1 i \\ ' \C Ti 7 l TT` le _/ 4 r r� • .J t +._ 'f� ''i ,• +�f1 t , , « -` - 9 S• - \ ! 1. `1 - - A ! 'r ` �` a X" i. ct '; �F _ , „ I tit, . r 111 witligl 11 4 poi ti 04 pie: a sia , ,-,•41. mg ._. .. i Ile 1 be. . . • dialtill p hi a i 6 ell r ' ij lifibefiiiialisaiiiiiitriiiih itiiIkstii, ge- iisirrgillilleglirol - ) - t .. , Ai . ... ______._ ___ ___ ,, , ., _ _ _ ___ _ . _ la r I ..... _ 1/4 Nrib ► ••• . / - / ` - - >♦.. \ All ,- .. If r11 # • - / J y�,� Iela DJ ' `.- L 1 R. _ , • 'i ` t �•w _ .wd. _ - �rI _`� .. r7 :}� •-�' t - illi 1/4 T •tr Nlikkr- ` • • _ - •1- . . ..•I ,!� .+. _ I , ,i - _ _ !I �, � �' _ -41 .�,�_ y 7• - -.- ice - � ,1 •�^•_ .'�► ++ ,.. �c� •, • riiiirA ere s f' t 1• 7 J , ..ti �^ . j1�1r! - r . • T� � - •i } ''�1 '♦J ek t� • - - r' Y • •S [ �. � 1 _41 .y -air r r -mat v+ Imo- �JI � " ' "rlli7�'V' •. `♦•• .► As i'�,r , IPS .••-- .�./ .. auk �+w 'QT'�. s _ - J '.fit - _ w \ - - ).. -�•. ♦ . y�`�,yl" l • r ' - t y J �aL • • ,f \a ` I , iR . l ��,�j _ v� J v y •a 1 '/ / ' i� _ ` 'T`1.A ! - _ • _ . _ �r ' - - �" a t . • • - - = t Q: ^,. � r -• ^ - - • - • r .►,i + 3 v • f _ .q' 4-4, a-• ere. �� •T'lw yr -t'1v•) a i •. ' - - -: . ? \11 .. / -- -- _ - " l `� / ' - - -.., 131 ••••,...- •-• er ...e- -11' ' C-ose' 'fr.; •••rrosiest##.•*...->-. ../.-' ...e ,„_. "--....... '''..-....-- _.,,,-- N • \, { � . • i i� iiiiii...._......- . - -------C±:- ,-------.......1-4:-....-Cf---_-------::::--2------1<::::„ --::.-------::::::---2-C77-;.::::----R-: ...0__::-..:-:1--:::C::..--C-"'"'••-•e.......• r- a°--o:ear-----Srir::-P-"--------._.------t- -▪ -------1 , - '=� jar-^�'/� �•= f.�/ 1• 2. --:__,.__T"•••• era,...:0":„Tre...-..r...71••":-er-"°•••-• e--; • ON:. .. 4 -„,,• e, _._ ___ _. .... rd ,„ / ::‘:-.1.41:::....1/.:1,710.i. ,..- ,,,, __ -- - -- -- - ...- __44,4,4••••r-a:por• _44.444.79 i#ra r7i . • IA r ♦. • .� • • 1 . , i /., • cA • • \ \ ils:40.: ..i „ a I,. _ ... .. „ , ...„ J.:: r... ___ •__ :I i I:"14 • di°1°1 •- • r *1 " 4 'X. • ,imil1/4._ sil. _ amminiiilb Tit • .. / � Va`rl •• ; ' ti •'' ' •pv ` � II ♦ ��' • '.•. i 41111Wiwi .`,` d •-- • 're' 'If: ..� `' dam.•, • - _f 117 kr ere .•• = . - : `4" _`., •r . 14 '• �>s. :• '�'I• • • �pys [` •fir i- •+ <. ` • r _• ~ 'f. - ,rI . � .••. •w. . !✓ -/• : ; � ♦ . �_ /// •• �A , I ''•• :• �Y `' ► l - > !_ '� .L% . . - tea, • . • . . - - f - -•rl / �* . �. I • De 197 p • \ •�- r •`,'� { i / • � f; •Y L' faA• . . . • _;,'�4 • �A w _ '�-• • �• • lic \ - • •• �-. : •'• _L{• ! • . •am' v • - � '��, •_ I' •• f1, �•y� ► .�••./,�► -�•� •. - . I b• ► r • • •ig i' \•,�.; - Ii • - �t r.1 .T��.�' • /• - ! • 1, , �' -- ' _.. Y . l'elrilit7.;:f �i^ ' /.• • � •, . 7/ ♦ .,• • It w9 �rL.... • •/_ i'"'i -.• •. - Lr _ N_ ' �i . � _ Ii �r. r ri i - - \ Ate' �.iin' y, • . • - t+•, "' et f. '•- . � . _ . . ` _ + _ T. R ,, _h.�. _ .� • •, • - 1 �' . ,, •, •'`'��}� • ..: ; tea. . � j. S' i . - w` .:.. , . 14 '/��I 1 O :J"•: /� >'• • 4 •- ' • • .A -1 .�'• ' Cr• �!a• -• 040 le •:Pi `� •ti_ • `:•, . .- - •Y � .`� f _ - I J , � ". � • �, 1r� - - ^ •,�`�*��1�•' � l^ '•f �• ` ' A' - • rI • - ' •, •'+ / l L , ;id, _ - "a.^I -••1"3 f - - rl i. 414 • • �I • r. fi ' l • �• 'I *.. 1./ R _ , -1 ! • c>�, � =�i.. ! I� . i•Y _ tl '-trr {' ` r1✓` • ` I . i{ Y f Y r �_ r_�� - % • Iles • - _ ..'� I ,/ � ..�q s '1.a.�•• + mil• ~ r - 1' '� . , 'g'�.,ir•. _ - ! � Y !Y` ^ y� _ / .� I ll - i - - •� • - - - - / • 1, 0, e / - r ♦ - - � •,' - _ - •1 _ .L: - i� _ r' _ ._ �SI_ 4 .-� ,1 ii� • 1y� ! '1- L' ,.,. .._),y ♦'I, p all _ A �( �►�. S!•. • .116. ri • .I. l - __ _ __- - _ - . - '" - ' _______;_vi I f. 4 • • • __. i2� --� +. = i ry. H R i'• �. ; , -T- ~ r it --- ,.r - / _ - r _ro : --_ -� -_�AIII __ • ln 0. �� ' . fi � , . . . • 41 : ' i 9 : / p' •1 •. I. I. � � ��� y A �_ ` , �• , r • .fin - �� �� if1 . + . 1 f . / -• . • ` ytH � V. ' � i ./ ` /, L R �' _ - ` ► Or N `1h \. • Y• �- - - �_ i'il _ J. �T-": ,y le - • ' , I '� ` • CIS • • � . 1 . ' , . ' : " + i11. I a • � , _ t \ .d + 1 • 4iIP'.�, ,r 0. _ .i L ' M' ! 1"• `�, .� /�- �� .� - _r �K <. •� � • 'Y �_ k _ . • • •1 ; ) . S, • • II y '. D I • w i rt l� • , • • r � i ((' ,1 4. i! ' 1! t • �•i f P 1 is • " �. _- _ qy i • tA1 �: •;'... _ '1a ' , , . r - y • • r 1 . r ` I ' , ^ / {L • T ` 1 I' - .A ' •1 Ir_ • ,f 1 ri . A] li• ,•� .� ► r •1 • •' + • �, 1 < • • ' , II - ]'"• �-1 I s , 1 „ fr �, 'I .. by VIj %rf R '/' �� �, j ' f� + 1 �• 4• r. y � i.� �� S,: '" � ,� o. �- 'r • i_ • YS �`f '_ 1 - 19 .n-_ . . . ► -� .• . 1 � �. IIf : R ,k ) N n A , . r• 43/4 j �I -e„�•� �� .•� 1 �t � �( 41 T `� $` 1f .: : '• }, • t ' - : F� 1 _.• • •1 : I/yj ' t; , . { • • .. ,979 , ' • ? ' )•>' z f` �� � I * 1� � -"t,• 7�/ `� --- ' � � - �. - `l1, r ' ,.� t � . , >rl v7i ye-'1 Z- -.4_ . >I -,- + f �. ,� / • 1 - y� yCr✓ :i ' E11 II ' f 1� r _ i 1 - - • . _ y..�_ _ tr . '�'F- y.1�'a -_ T f 6 `TI •'•i1•/Ilt : � ( _ I ( YI r '� :l + � 9�•• f / .l f•!' >. I = , t " . Jj ! / A ti->_ ^�"�_ • . - _ � ' - t I I II � ' ram ` . I• . § � I►II _ - /- , ` •� .0 ; > _ . ! ■ ^-�-•]Si/ ra • , f rfi1. ' ifs' l 11 i �Y •� ri., ` ��- r j 1 �• 114/,tvit..l����� 1 ' ' R „ e C• ,� ••'i 74, ( - .1 K .f + � 'T`�. {1! �� fly 1 * ! ` ' - .L- - r • •� __ - +. _+ - - s �• 11r f S ri 11 P • �. ARE : ♦ ti 11•" 4 ' 7rY? y1. - -.4R �V q �` n - � 51: , - _ _ �!'�-�� _� i `, - -- 7. ii "s• • 1 • 1, t yr/ • - omit • • • �_`�� _ f _�••• \ . f ♦ _ ^ 1 1 r '\ C I r ( ••/ - R" Y , } - + .'ba ' <,y ti .,_- is �' y - a j PIS at 1 • - 111 _-" - SIP J4 - - -". • - - 1 .., _ lid --� 1 _ - - - - _ . - , +_ ` ''-- ; �. � 'r- _ "-- ap-lift'Zv. _ - _ - - - - - -� " .�• - . } t' - i J '� ••. • +rF ' - - - •ikin �•- r ` i ` ti it • J fir-+ _ - ��•+ _ � _n : • t �•. -' •�" . r • I ',+;�� - _ f _ � - a , �� - y _ , < -.•5---- _ ✓ 7c d - _ 7J �. i _ y=/ 1•, ~•i- �- t. _ - - _ _ � '_ _ y� r �ryis. • L-� --t' i M '�• L + f� - J ~ e '- . " ._ - •`. � • l" f • i � 1l •, _ •1 ` r . Y Y -• - � S � ,. j '•��•pip - • -Y- ..4Sy^-✓�i:� - r' - � _ - )1 - "' -w • ' ✓ N. •• '` _- yy. •. _ S' ' r . ._t •- �. � a}1�M. r 'C;� /--� ;•• Atb- -� _ _ ak f• - -• - =CJq ,rY -- - ' . : - ` .a • i► - OS ' _ - I _ - J, 4' ' . 1l''.. -V mac.-- T'• Al"(� - ! 1/ T Z -�L� r. .. \• ,l •- •'-�,er. r _ .'1eS seat_ �• \/�4 _q _ � . -_`Y • - ]Ml.• � +' ..s ' rrak-•4-'_r •- -- .0 • - _ 4q It 94 _fir ..I _ - I • i.• ' I l - ` . - •/E-d • •, - /, _f - •S`�r� Q. i M's r IF - - • .• fi �4 4 -• ^ './C•. - - _ - y tcHe. •.I •Lf } �- ' _ '1. i ••0���1� .. � l • ... of . ' Y/' N . iJ `l4 f l=1''- -~ _ - Zr- i 'b. ;Y� ! _ -.. . ' ''�• r .7 - : - _ rc -a - ` l _ ,h:y-~ � ....w - A - _ - _ 924.°1 ai _ - _ .. ' -.�. �. • - :•r - _ ram. _ _ ^y.F ^� - _ r'' 14, „ l� ` •_�' _�. : "tGi .� - •. / a r �1. T A. _ cle ,y. �' -_�/- _ - _ ;+ . . - - >; ♦ l �} f" "` am ' ✓_� _ _ - _ • a ' i- .F-' a• �" - _ 7 -'�G' 1 v - ' _ r - J r 7 • ' �.{r >..` t } rr ' • y • -„ .!„r .• s ka � ,4 Y • t t' < �- aT `_ �-. ♦., - - - - • -_ti. i - ' w ` vl '..r - s '� -ally • ( " - fe+ta vats/ if 1 -C: ' f _ 'r'b� 1r .y -+ '� - Y 11 ' - '�i •►G- .1 �+- •'•• t- 1. - : '` w . tom( J ' . `p-- -ai i .r _-•✓ '"^J ' •JL •�.Y �.- J • rt* r � � �r ` _ 1 - • \ " :M•I _ ..fr i. -yam-- 1. fJ/ - L `l -L44 „4, i ' Y / ^ /Iw ; .:{. _, - - 1 { , , Via..4 .• _ ,� I - etr 'w�; <•�= "'.. - _I�' . Pr� �+'" • ,�nnet. �' - _ - r r ' - J0J+ •- .(I Y�' �' - • ' Jim.._gyp. y1 . w-- �- L 1�SI .. ' ,1 `i ' - - v rs„ A agar Pee w i trc-, ,__ us • c. O = ' `- 1r I 1 . • - - • t}-'. -• Je..♦ I. -•fi 4�. I► - /w eJ • - ►I ' - r ; 4 + •• • ••, -T'JI' - - .. - - e . • ! - _ - - - - _ _ - r• _ TY. .iT 'ice - .. _ ,r.- -�1__ - '1 A;-,4I..c..0a1. :,..•Y.• S re'i a I lr - :1 Tt'1tr-,ro-_Iti-.i•-.--, ..4o.i 4 -,-_.-(. • i .ice s �- Zv:d". = " . _ (' r.- -1 7•.. - _ _ 1 -• ,'1/ - _ - :r"" + r �y •a.•.• Jam.,. __ :: - . '• • - r - - �- ._I.- ` _ - .. - ��= . _,'`ll• ' _ .' • : .e -.,a - - • t5� _ - a v'- - .. Jam, r - - - - - : � �. , _.�'T+ ail -_ _ -fr �s. - •e. _ P. { , • // i1.. rT sr�._ .i. • rI r . _ ,t.� y. •�•� - max• --' • u - '- 3• �.' ^ - -••i%'I ;: e• - _ i ' _ _ -. _ ✓ - .-?mot '� ' l �0'. .• '� it - _ �-s�'- ` • - --� ' / . . -i- -. - _ .. ✓•' !: (• „ IFS" i - - _ _. - - d :r*r•. - - . = •!� -(/ •� .4, _v- -s rT - I ' !'J I- HP,/Ji •e`4'r _ - a• ' .i /� '-• / h - - _ - 1. - •- _ -' .JQ -./ - 'a sr z�y P , _ / - / k. - •1 .. 1 a. r‘- ram`' L - 1 _ "S4l1-.*._•, i. tle .so.• - ice_i ¢' - . _ . _ t'• Y - - - < i ' 1 - N '�4• _ - • - • 3' ^'Zt - _ �iy'••r ',fr►- _ - - - •4'r✓ + L 00 - ^I ' f `�'i i Y `1 _ -r _ ''O X►Ati.`- - rl - _-- 1 , ' I• - t ` `" r - - `I " - - -r/ i t - . _ _ ' . 1 - _" _ ` • - y - _ 1artm,ctss f- -_ 1 j ° ,.f•� _ _ - 1 ` ^•yr - - �i!- t - - J% ✓ - / - S _ - - - 1 - - ! - / - -1,4 - s ] - + �- x ` - it - - ` I.- - ,, - - - - - .- "` `C - _ _ ) i `} / - - _ _ _ , - - ^.•_ -/ f` , �` f ✓, ; •' •l t • - _ _ T ' l : _ _ j _.'�G!" =ice=trf _/ _ l♦- 4 _% ' r ) - "-"' -T - I - - '.' -".•5..,. .1 - ' ( -' -r _ .( )....r .F w --- - ) _ ?L , - c- _ ` ft_ i ^Cs`_y/`r ,^'' •' i - ` _ itJ ' , 1r '^ - _ I, %. 'I 1 _ / lr `' T _ ^ rii" \ -` _ o a - •. _ - -1. ± ��r - t"^l r , +_ . / , 7 . t�". - 1 ' / _ - r l . J 1 - • r .` . „ • J^" " - - / -may l " - •.'f J _ �` - ' ► _ . - ` aqC _r - - Q", _ .d^ r- - _-a -.- ., : e ` _ -a� , 5 . - ` . -, - l ! - '1-_.•-� _ y. +A • \f _ ter _ •�.' . - ;:.f - < _ ter.- ,:. • .1t 7 �.5 ,1' a .� 1' _ _ Jr.-. ' a - - 4 l �f �f' . ( •A[ • L l - ° . • \ _ t .^ r M i , +4 , 'r rys t� ;�• - 3. - e' ' _. f Z„ -.. � p/ ' .1 - rt' r ..\ rS _ ,, ' -p✓< "l 1 r - !+ _ 'r' Y. ' \ ' ( sa.•r`+' i l 'F. ' - IJrr :- r i r `a•rk I. •a/ ' •_ • 1/ f 1•. _s."•.•�'' / f. \ .r� V`- Tv *• l J _r.I - ( _ fit+. - .s• _Y . _ ...` \r, y •. , .. ' - '"f" • - e . As i_ ice••' i" S- - _ I S ' " ""r- ' _ / 9, / f f . .. ,ty _ _ i _ ✓k f CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Public Hearings 08/16/11 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development/Planning Prairie Ridge VIIL B. Janet Jeremiah/Scott A. Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers, and Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres; and • Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 9.69 acres into 22 lots, one outlot and road right-of-way; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and Commission recommendations and Council conditions; and • Approve and Authorize Issuance of a Grading Permit for the Prairie Ridge project subject to release by the City Engineer upon determination that the final contract documents conform to plans stamp dated August 4, 2011, as approved by the City Council. Synopsis This project is a 22 single family residential development. All lots meet the R1-13.5 zoning district requirements. A PUD waiver is needed to accommodate the cul-de-sac length. Background Information The proposed cul-de-sac is 972 feet. This exceeds the maximum 500 feet permitted by City Code. A waiver will be necessary through the PUD. The waiver is necessary since the surrounding area is developed which precludes this road from a connection to other roads in the area. The 120-Day Review Period Expires on October 22, 2011. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted 4-2-1 to recommend approval of the project at the July 11, 2010 meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution-PUD Concept 2. Resolution-Preliminary Plat 3. Staff Report-July 8, 2011 4. Location Map 5. Land Use Map 6. Zoning Map 7. Aerial photo 8. Letter to Neighbors 9. Grading Plan 80 scale 10. Grading Plan 30 scale 11. Geotechnical Evaluation Report 12. Grading Permit Letter 13. Planning Commission Minutes Approved-July 11, 2011 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF PRAIRIE RIDGE FOR MANLEY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on July 11, 2011, on Prairie Ridge by Manley Development and considered their request for approval of the PUD Concept plan and recommended approval of the request to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 16, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Prairie Ridge, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans stamp dated August 4, 2011. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission July 11, 2011. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk EXHIBIT A PUD Concept- (Prairie Ridge) Legal Description: The West 417.2 feet of that part of Government Lot 2, Section 5, Township 116, Range 22, lying South of the East-West Road, except the West 16.5 feet thereof. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE RIDGE FOR MANLEY DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Prairie Ridge for Manley Development stamp dated August 4, 2011, and consisting of 9.69 acres into 22 lots and 1 outlot and road right-of-way, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: July 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Prairie Ridge APPLICANT: Manley Development OWNER: Donald A. Rogers Trust LOCATION: 17555 Duck Lake Trail 120 DAY REVIEW: October 20, 2011 REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 9.69 acres 3. Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres 4. Preliminary Plat of 9.69 acres into 22 single family lots, and one outlot Staff Report— Prairie Ridge July 8, 2011 Page 2 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the site as Low Density Residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. Surrounding property is Low Density Residential, with Park to the south. The property is zoned R1-22. The surrounding property is R1-22, with Rural to the south. A zoning district change is proposed from R1-22 to R1-13.5. PRELIMINARY PLAT The plat shows 22 single-family lots and outlot at a density of 2.27 units per acre and lots ranging between 13,534 sq. ft. to 23,784 sq. ft. All lots meet or exceed the R1-13.5 requirements. The adjacent neighboring lots range between 20,140 sq. ft. to 25,384 sq. ft. All lots meet the required setbacks for R1-13.5 zoning. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVER The proposed cul-de-sac is 972 feet. This exceeds the maximum 500 feet permitted by City Code. A waiver will be necessary through the PUD. The waiver is necessary since the surrounding area is developed which precludes this road from a connection to other roads in the area. GRADING AND TREE LOSS There are 3,211 diameter inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss due to construction is calculated at 46%, or 1,477 diameter inches. Tree replacement is 901 diameter inches. The tree replacement plan shows 301 three-inch caliper trees meeting this requirement. DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES Drainage will include infiltration basins, infiltration swales, and storm sewer in the rear yard as indicated on the plans. City sewer and water is available to the property. TRAIL The proposed trail meets ADA standards and ties into the existing trail to the north. Outlot A to be dedicated to the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the following request: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 9.69 acres. 3. Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 9.69 acres into 22 lots and 1 outlot. Staff Report— Prairie Ridge July 8, 2011 Page 3 This is based on plans stamp dated July 6, 2011, the Staff Report dated July 8, 2011 and the following conditions: 1. Prior to release of the final plat, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Pay all City sewer and water assessment and connection fees. C. Dedicate Outlot A to the City. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the grading limits in the wooded areas for trees to be preserved as part of the development. Said fencing shall be field inspected by the City Forester prior to any grading. 3. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the proponent shall: A. Submit a tree replacement/landscaping bond, letter of credit, or escrow surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping. B. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. 4. The following waiver is granted through the PUD for the project: A. Cul-de-sac length of 972 feet. City Code maximum is 500 feet. Area Location Map - Prairie Ridge Address: 17555 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie, MN 55346 S411111 HONEY SUCKL=IN _ 'NS7TH-STR T CIR u I X ` rni INTRY IDE R C / W R7TI— BARRERRY CIR J II. �_ — — — — — — — — — — _11111" U O ------------ IIpP SITE J. I 41, iir w w om_._.__- _��.,.�.'. 0 Duck Lake ;TERLINCTER I r PFTFRRORG RD t S T � r 1111P I 1‘1° I I N 4 • I / 4_, 1 itall Its ,' p�CLKnDR=_ ,�' ►� o e atIli iikv.� _ , 7(---„it , , ______,,,,,_,) wit � V EY VI <?0 I I V'�TEY VIEW RU \ Guide Plan Map Prairie Ridge 17555 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie, MN .4111110" Et W6T &T _ 0 2.- W x \Nil HST m BAR 'R RY ill 7 r- _ 411 r ....., _ _ _ O 70 �� KLA - - _ _-it L - ___ r � _ ,... 1IiVL 46 . _ si SITE __ PA p SD'sell - ' * SU Far VI F*11.3, . i OilibiAlPilit'11114:":91-E Y ID `V SIN ' ' • UT 11116 ___ o 74i0R:tiglast --' I 1 Os • - - wel- , ,,, . ., ---\____ M A lim XIII IIIØW*aw; imm - „ _iallilIF fa I itni Vili ♦ W � / SALLA Legend N Streams n Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre Neighborhood Commercial Principal Arterial 1 Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre Community Commercial 17.7 Low Density/Public/Open Space -Regional Commercial -A Minor Arterial -B Minor Arterial DATEA i� I A Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre®Town Centerpproved 03-19-03 DATE Revised 12-06-06 O Medium Density Residential/Office l Park/Open Space —Major Collector DATE Revised 11-07-05 DATE Revised 03-01-07 DATE Revised -23-06 DATE Revised 06-01-07 E D E N DATE Revised 02-23-06 DATE Revised 10-01-07 High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre �PubliPublic/Quasi-Public 0 Ouasi-Public Minor Collect or DATE Revised 03-23-06 DATE Revised 3-01-0 8 J Airport 1-1 GolfCourse DATE Revised 06-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-09 Office -Church/Cemetary PRAIRIE V ,I Office/Industrial Open Water //II LIVE•WORK•DREAM r// Office/Public/Open Space Right-Of-Way »e, o.....�,�.o..m.�...®..�..,.a.,�.. ......®ma•_ma . ,,,o® -Industrial o.2s sin o I I Miles Zoning Map Prairie Ridge 17555 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie MN / —1--w- W6T 1 I R� 111,1* HS <N- M BR--, R RY Z p, J r ik 14114111P ♦ SITEL______________-----------------\4idlb .. Vt. Owl Air ,.. ST - I N I I TEE I g,,, I .,. 17...- AtEM, R II___ _ C ,•U ORE ..)' rfi 9 * M LA „Mt 74,11,41-."\—711 1 l'..• A....a Sit al Rural -Regional Commercial Shoreland Management Classifications N R1-44 One Family-44,000 sf.min. TC-C I NE I Natural Environment Waters R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. n TC-R I RD I Recreational Development Waters lar.. r• I,/.. 1.1 R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. al TC-MU I GD I General Development Waters(Creeks Only) R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. Industrial Park-2 Acre Min, P7Z 100- Year Floodplain EDEN RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A.max. Industrial Park- 5 Acre Min. Up dated through approved Ordinances#26-2008 -RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A.max. General Industrial-5 Acre Min. Ordinance#33-2001(BFI Addition)approved,but not shown on this map edition PRAIRIE Office J Public Date:March 1,2009 Neighborhood Commercial I Golf Course In case of discrepancy related to a zoning classitmaaon on this zoning map,the ordinance LIVE•WORK•DREAM and attached legal description on file at Eden Paine Ciry Center will prevail. E.Community Commercial Water -Highway Commercial Right of Way 0 0.1 0.2 -Regional Service Commercial Miles .wa,_o...m..=m._..®..t..o.,.,, ..,_..anot.m ,..,,mo, Aerial Map - Prairie Ridge Address: 17555 Duck Lake Trail, Eden Prairie, MN 55346 . . f111.4%.. \''''•• NM ,''sc up._ 04,, 11 4.:•••:''' ; • '1# ' Erg . -:,I,, ;,, i;t. .-'<f.4: 6.. . ., w iiii > < „.....,_,.. . •••••.•,,,., ,:.. .... ., . . ,. ...:, ,t ., .., . ,.....,.....„, .:,•,! _ ,,, . •iv,_: , , . . 1/1/4 4 TRL -mot_- YY ...._ ,It , _ _ _ __ in_ _ w • 4.: •. i, W :s, -` fix `. III z PADONS DR .� -- } 9 IiI_--,.r•4.n r' CI w m Q m l S�oN>• > EVEN — r^ } SITE STERLING TER- N } ' --; t: ?i air e,; ,-- . •c --• ,. i.:74- 41r. C. ,\�\\ ` I 125 250 500 Feet i� ' "r • ..., ‘ . " ' f�as s�R` SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAYZATA , MINNESOTA , N �y 55391 ( 952 ) 476 - 6000 FAX ( 952 ) 476 - 0104 'FRs P�P� August 1, 2011 Judy Spencer Beth Soderberg 6848 Barberry Lane 6900 Barberry Lane Eden Prairie, 55346 Eden Prairie, 55346 952.270.4922 612.388.0483 (cell) RE: Prairie Ridge Eden Prairie, Minnesota Judy& Beth — Thank you for voicing your concern about the storm water runoff into the proposed pond adjacent to your properties. I would like to take a minute to explain how storm water ponds are designed for today's developments. The City has requirements that state the storm water runoff rate in the post-development condition must be lower than the pre-development condition. In order to do this, we design storm water ponds, or holding ponds. These ponds are designed to hold the increased site runoff and then outlet the runoff at a rate equal to or less than the pre-development rate. A Storm Water Management Report has been put together comparing the pre- and post-development drainage characteristics. A copy of this report can be seen at our office. We have designed this site so that the storm water that runs towards your properties has been minimized by constructing rear yard drainage swales leading to storm sewer catch basins or ponds. All storm sewer systems within the site collect storm water and convey the runoff north towards Duck Lake Trail. Looking at your properties in particular, the storm water runoff rate has been drastically reduced when compared to the pre-development condition. There is a proposed rear yard drainage swale between Lots 4 and 7 of Block 1. This swale carries runoff to a catch basin and is carried north into the storm sewer system in Duck Lake Trail. The outflow for Pond "B" also ties into the storm sewer system leading to Duck Lake Trail. If the pond outflow were to ever become clogged, the pond would overflow to the south and into the City Park. These storm water practices result in a significant decrease in surface water runoff towards your property. Based on a 10 year rainfall event the rate and volume of runoff towards your properties after the development is completed is reduced by 75%. Braun Intertec Corporation prepared a geotechnical report (Project BL-11-02658), evaluating subsurface soil and groundwater conditions with regard to the proposed subdivision. Just west of Pond "B" a soil boring was completed (Boring ST-4). The boring shows 4' of clayey sand, followed by 12' of poorly graded sand, terminating at a depth of 915.6. The soil boring did not find any ground water. An Infiltration Test was also done within Pond "B" (DRI B). The test yielded an average infiltration rate of 24.4 in/hr, which is classified as excessively well-drained. Attached with this letter is a copy of the Braun Intertec Geotechnical Evaluation Report. If you have any questions or need any additional information please call me at(952)476-6000. Sincerely, SATHRE-BERGQUST, INC. Nathan R. Herman, P.E. i i i w � � 1 II \ N I / I i I 1 I (OWNER: FISCHN-_ ---- \\\ i(i \ 11 I 1 \\'w F /J I I C NER: AILIE / L- `� \ N zaER: MULLIN ��I \ — Jai<NI I L--wI AV N NORDEN If " \___- °~aw l §o31 J ! I \ OWNER: HIBBS °it z / :I -gym w R �;: : Y7-I BRINK l \\, 11111(fl .r7-5----------:.-.....-....:;.:.:----------.C.: - y — .lit"---; - ►dam ��•� Lam.= _ ► -osa- e �- ., I 12 61P" �_ r _ u x /�yya- w m z r r g m 91; / >�yey s ...w . �r` m - :0gxy KXY / \ c.,,,,,,,,,,, ' 1 C'''''toll''',41-•• '-7-or.v 2-', • ir, 4-F--4 ,..i, . Apo ilip . 7 'Pe'cf 2 ,, , L m¢r of .' - '' m1 A ���� . r- k? -� '1 I jj�?.''. '0 i >wOLL q 1 ..• rt#7rr ,�' _ '; *., �► 4 ' (' ''4.? 'm - 1I / Lam �F a `- �� e%';i 0 I` 4�,qr t1 j-. Il• ,.JP g X OWNER: HARK v g z I `�22 , �,- ►:�.Jr , `d ~ I -2'W "5 rm� M ') OWNER �REIDALL N l � s_ Nay �?? r, I' 11`/CV �;:� �g °m hoc O F c�°' m �' ¢o v, n"� - m 3 1.71 mm v owN I w10 o L T�. 8m FINp=iiOI' R_ Z Jw 7 -_c ,, Li o m - 1 t r � �m� r(j�/ m /js � zSco)/n9Z3y - 1 1 �� 925.71 -7 (© / I / i ,r, ,' iv ts, „ # w -, W J 1 / w A U "ti. - m F r'/ "a' 1 a . -,_ \� V/ \\r-\ \ � � ml$, rcm I 1 y��1 I ai o J 1��.3 - � f� C7 .. \ ` �l� \11 ./ I r ; / LLwor y�/r " i \� 9a._\ ' ��` `, \t /-OWNER: LOHMAI.N�\ \� I I / // --1 Fp� I I' HBOE=/9311) � \ �� I I I b h932.4 932 4 Q z \ \ 0 6.3:.. 0 L 1- 7 1 Mk 6--\*---..fl -----4) )1 1 \ I\ i • I ► � � I I \ 1\ # , 1 U sue; / , � •1 ® 1 ) / 1 / I I I I( i V r m m '\ I A, # ' 2 m ml1 \ f/i�I� �` \ ,I.,` iu I / J OWNER: UNDERWOOD 1 I l /\ p" 0HO ( 4�I� k m J.m m I -4.t iP 2 I m°J1 �f 4 ., � �� r93/e L// 1(ti I I x szzs k {{ is, \ ,;a!' \ ,,-- .�: \/ �- ' I 1 ce\ 1 \ \ pi"Q ' \ �� 1 \ ! 3s ---- w 1 9's.5 0 OWNER: SPENCER \ --922- w I \ 1 1 OI 93. fir. ° 9.9 \ o - /o - - �1 ❑ I \ \ ,a :1;65) m�i ip Iwo r11 - --_� / LL \ 32 ® \\ t ; i 11 - , 1 IT i m Lo /-•.T., i,),ip : o �(' l //— -- �\ / � \ ir / \ \I\ • \ ; '..... I 0'\ -. H3B E_(:'.9fi1 ,,o I ®c, T.,5.), I I \ \ I \\ 1 � �_'��/4. ', \ 1 • f i .• 1 �T M OWNE SOpERBERG \ /'I OWNER:`HOE�N \ I I \ �1 + z>� I I 1 / 1 I 1 J l 1 929.4 929.6\ \: �� - ow" 939.0 J of O El \ I 1 / 1 1 —I „Ail"; tr� C) »y r44 ' 0 o a m I 1 / / cb I / / X w ( C v.A�a <NI + : ii. Oa h '? / I =- I \ / /� -_. I; a I', \� 1 \ Twin N- O , / , �, it 0 93.3 ! i z } 928.4 �� / / \ 1 1 m V / m r►ti_ L-�VY ;: / I I J OWNER: ELNESS I z c / �' s3s.3 kr, "r. �� \ ° OWN JOHNS -- \ 1 idliir N m \I 2 M ` I -. cv r N-` I 1 I \ I i---932-,fXpM •4ro_� rv /` tm� FC9i -',� UW� \ -.....� ,, - 2.5 + �xyl41317 s3.7_- ��`��- - - -_ - - 1 iI II l 1 C` x /` / ` 1Le''1 ... 'Z.',r r'E,•� C •v.m9 ; . N 933.' 1 I x930.5 �I �\ `' w / if, �O a '`_s i` f y I-.; '1"') 331 ( i II /m rr _ w° o { \ 1 1 OWNER: SMITI1 l li I T z err , x . Na, \ / I II z �nj 1 ► 500 -.._ I 1 I \ In ". A � i �f+. I (93s4o�) ° 8�8 \,N o PI;P IOWNER: MAHER \ / Y — - ^� Z 1 "mow I Iliii � � rn$�wLL ` ' a� I �� J I —°m `, z. I" Y � Ir+✓ _ LL LL p � �yc�� 2;.1 - 1c7r r I � I w , 1 936_9.2:£6'- - 132JOWNER: REU S i _ \ §I 4936 \ N 1093 0 ! 437.0 1 Y \ ! / x 931.0 I H -(9370) •, '' _^ I \ I 2D I I >0 o,, 1\ �.w I I I i�, b'o I °° 111 O d.,..i ( a OWNER: COOPER OA rca e�a��2(� U w �' LL w J1 m / ` r / LL / w O u 1 - \\ o~ r- w ��l f� o ! LL� � 9-77 x 932.5 r^ �_---z£e—� \'—� ` � m I r� ‘35° r / N 1, /off/ 9377s 1:37.59) 5a7 x< -t _ w fr( -E I I � o - _ I - U ' rn m I W � /m� i _ o X o /---\ ' ____J II 1 \-,Lizi ❑ F jj "1I ____- p d °/ 8z '\ 93$ m . ,,w r „ a! ?>m �, \\ 1 OWNER: DAMS J 2 aO1 N \ ,s w OWNER: GOUL16/STAHLKE ) I I I ❑ aLL ion 3 `$, o `�9�� 1 0� > � 1 c� -I-- ;. > 1 \ I / 11 1 O o ,* 9 b7.29 s35.7 J \\ I I I 1 K N 7, v 382F% 2 L'IW)=309H -mo t' X ,2+`-ti./ \ J {n pi w._I m v~o 0. \ d� Ovaa.s'zz - (9� • ''(aaz �V/ ` I I / \ 1 I JI � mw xo `�9� (\�� c .....:J J �C96.7 � \\.. lisk 046 tin I / / ,. 6 m\ �_- \ . virs .�-\WNER: BARKER I 1 1 I / �I b4� /92� 9���L� .' _,�: SF 9p6"I �\\ `. \Ta w K 1 11 �_� J I 1 .I s, ye / \No \\ zE0 ,1 ) I J 1 f (mII �, N 4 s1 / 3 �\eF933W-- I OWNER: BOLLINGER / II I \ �9aa- JT I l\- �` 1 o t< 1 N y I I J zzs 1 J (FI s h 1 Y --- a i _� - - \ C -- -I--924- m --J., ,� /`` 4 - � ---� m_ _�934,__ 1 �- a _ s�a�gm -wrc _ 5 5 �g�g'J ( WIRE 9AGKSTOPZ p, w aQ'��n= m s -� - $ J ) I �\ WNER: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ~ z 1 a e WT -- / 8� ��1'� I is i I , ."( ›cel `�8 I N 1 J .\ --4-----Ef-- LT) ( ) 1\ \ N O \ u , , ` CO o 0 13 nO co o 0 ' ' ° _ 7 , . Mcy, O Ch N;T a 4) O )Ac0 ) / M J 2%6 0_ :cf' ) 0/W \ -R: L \ 3-RW003 \ 27 LL 11 \ ) a 11J j / / / / j '''''... . , 932.0 / , __ -,..4.,...N ,.(- _ ''''''''7\ y---§-3,--1---)/ r / i 'l,/ I / / ,O A , , %.7.4,..,•, / // ON 4;1515° ./(6 I Q 0cd > orn / 1 11l � " — \ I ITI- J Of, , CD 41' Z--- /I /I 1 , /�/� .. / III z 0.)71. LL )c..0 �oO�r4 LL ' lik / m r / A 1 9 `6.5 O 939 8\ r - . vim ► l \ \ \il il c0 /O O ' r I oi 9��� " O N — I / CV 65) 0) *' � LL � � CA _ CA � i ti u_ c; i i, ILO // coo) I l o O 1 I :� �� °i j + N O 0 i , 0) / r- 7 w I / W �� - w !1 '% m n O co i I IC(1 III I , E3 4 \ c:c-)-j I j ? 939.E OS 25.2� _ I et? o HBOE= (039.6) [ I V ► I OW\ = SO91 B_—RG Z > W �. OM CO I > CO L) J ~ '-Jo - OO O I N 1 °' } - LL LL C� 1 I m \o °� o 1— LL 1, ; 1 \ 37) I 1 I 00 _ I D 1 \ 1, ` l N I / - I � boa) , O 1 Oao I WQ > M \.n / mc� � � w 7 / 0 °) CO \ rn \ A �� / / / —� I \ / 93 1.3 0!1 928.4 A 1 i / ic-144 / m 0 / i- - g 4'; .-..'`CD M O kin / OW\ _R/ JO- \ SO\ O M M / LLU _1 0, 0 1 `\ 1 \ , I 0) I9 o • L \�,.� m� 0 w X N `��� > + / \ ^ 932,J\ l O M W \ 1 / v � cnJ x�32.5 1- w 7" (j34.033.7 �� Ivv y _ 933.5 N CI -� 1i V_\N O I 1 � ~ w I x \ jcoJ \ oM ---1 a OW\- : VA- -R M CDC 1 O � 4 ' > Z \ _6 corn \ 0 • Geotechnical Evaluation Report Proposed Duck Lake Trail Residential Development 17555 Duck Lake Trail Eden Prairie, MN Prepared for Mr. Kurt Manley 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. .0111 f LICENSED G dro, PE, PG PROFESSIONAL' resident—Principal Engineer a ENGINEER License Number: 18221 s �'. 18221 ,•'f� June 13, 2011 , F' •... ...i • Project BL-11-02658 • Braun Intertec Corporation :i.,11011 I t 9�i t 'S B RAC!N Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 952.995.2000 INTERTEC 1 1001 Hompshire Avenue S Fox: 952 995 2020 x b Minneapolis, MN 55438 Web: brounintertec.com yyt� 1110 June 13, 2011 Project BL-11-02658 IftlitA Mr. Kurt Manley a � -�F,��� 17555 Duck Lake Trail,LLC ;O 9262 Albright Court lit* -v-,00sio Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 Yg .c i4:` n -1 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation k;" o..�vti�yl ` ' ` Duck Lake Trail Residential Development � > 17555 Duck Lake Trail aM A Eden Prairie, Minnesota ;�•; Dear Mr. Manley: We have completed our geotechnical evaluation for the proposed single-family residential development ;• ..4.1 ' at 17555 Duck Lake Trail in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation was �v.��� to assist you and your design team in evaluating the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions with f ` ,i regard to site grading and foundation support for the proposed homes, streets,and underground utilities within this proposed development. Please consult the attached report for details on our field and Va laboratory test results,our recommendations and conclusions. iiktirm °;�¢�1 - Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions -, FtI about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please 55. anY call Gregg Jandro at 952.995.2270. plig ?' Awl Sincerely, .,¢,:11 ctl ire . �^e BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORA TION Y�� . A'°r t� 5 ggR. ro, PE, PG p{• Vice Pre ' ent- Principal Engineer 74\-' n` Gregory J. Bialon, PE Principal Engineer t 0104N c: Mr. Bill Coffman; Coffman Development Services week.y Mr. Robert Molstad, PE; Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. GeoRpt-Duck Lake Trail xr� i O Providing engineering and environmental solutions since I957 Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction 1 A.1. Project Description 1 A.2. Purpose 1 A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents 1 A.4. Site Conditions 1 A.S. Scope of Services 2 B. Results 3 B.1. Exploration Logs 3 B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets 3 B.1.b. Geologic Origins 3 B.2. Geologic Profile 3 B.2.a. Geologic Materials 3 B.2.b. Groundwater 4 B.3. Laboratory Test Results 4 B.4. Infiltrometer Tests 4 C. Basis for Recommendations 5 C.1. Design Details 5 C.1.a. Building Structure Loads 5 C.1.b. Pavements and Traffic Loads 5 C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes 5 C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information 6 C.2. Design and Construction Considerations 6 D. Recommendations 6 D.1. House Pad and Pavement Subgrade Preparation 6 D.1.a. Excavations 6 D.1.b. Excavation Dewatering 7 D.1.c. Selecting Excavation Backfill and Additional Required Fill 8 D.1.d. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill 8 D.2. Spread Footings 9 D.2.a. Embedment Depth 9 Subgrade Improvement 9 D.2.c. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure 10 D.2.d. Settlement 10 D.3. Basement Walls 10 D.3.a. Drainage Control 10 D.3.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill 10 D.3.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads 11 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.4. Interior Slabs 12 D.4.a. Moisture Vapor Protection 12 D.4.b. Radon 12 D.5. Exterior Slabs 12 D,6. Pavements 13 D.6.a. Subgrade Proof-Roll 13 D.6.b. Design Sections 13 D.6.c. Materials and Compaction 14 D.6.d. Subgrade Drainage 14 D.7. Utilities 14 D.7.a. Su bgrade Stabilization 14 D.7.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill 14 D.S. Construction Quality Control 15 D.8.a. Excavation Observations 15 D.8.b. Materials Testing 15 D.8.c. Pavement Subgrade Proof-Roll 15 D.8.d. Cold Weather Precautions 15 E. Procedures 16 E.1. Penetration Test Borings 16 E.2. Material Classification and Testing 16 E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification 16 E.2.b. Laboratory Testing 16 E.3. Groundwater Measurements 16 F. Qualifications 16 F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions 16 F.1.a. Material Strata 16 F.1.b. Groundwater Levels 17 F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility 17 F.2.a. Plan Review 17 F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing 17 F.3. Use of Report 17 F.4. Standard of Care 17 Appendix Boring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets, Borings ST-1 through ST-6 Descriptive Terminology Infiltrometer Test Results(2) BRAUN INTERTEC A. Introduction A.1. Project Description A residential development is planned for a parcel of land south of Duck Lake Trail at the address of 17555 Duck Lake Trail in Eden Prairie. The development will include 22 single-family house pads (in 2 blocks) along with associated roadways, underground utilities and two infiltration basins. A.2. Purpose The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation was to assist you and your design team in evaluating the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions with regard to site grading and foundation support for the proposed homes,streets, and underground utilities within this proposed development. The infiltrometer tests will aid the basin designers. A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) is also being prepared for this site and will be presented under separate cover. A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents: • Grading and drainage plan, dated May 20, 2011, prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. • Available aerial photographs showing the existing site features and structures. • A site visit with Coffman Development Services. • Geologic atlas showing the general soil types in this area. A.4. Site Conditions The site of the proposed residential development currently consists of an abandoned,single-family residential lot. The lot is about 9 1/2 acres and is located on the south side of Duck Lake Trail. The north area of the lot currently includes the entrance driveway to the site and this area is relatively thickly wooded. Apparently,the southern half of the site is less vegetated and the south boundary abuts a schoolyard playfield. BRAUN iklTIDTPr. 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 2 Site elevations range from about 940 near the current house location where a gentle mound exists. Elevations slope down to the north,to Duck Lake Trail at about elevation 922. The southern half of the site slopes gently down to elevation 930 at the south border. A low area is also found near the middle of the east property line at about elevation 926. A.S. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this project was originally submitted May 25, 2011 as a Proposal to Mr. Kurt Manley of 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC for a Geotechnical Evaluation, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 1 ESA) and a Hazardous Building Materials (HAZMAT) Inspection. We received authorization to proceed with the Geotechnical Evaluation and Phase 1 ESA from Mr. Manley on May 26, 2011. The HAZMAT survey will be performed by others. Tasks performed in accordance with our authorized scope of services for the Geotechnical Evaluation included: • Coordinating the locations of underground utilities near the soil boring locations • Performing 6 penetration test borings to nominal depths of 16 feet. • Performing laboratory tests on selected soil samples. • Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, exploration logs, summary of the soils and groundwater encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for subgrade preparation and the design of the proposed residential development. • Performing two (2) double ring infiltrometer tests in the areas of two proposed infiltration basins. The excavations to the test depth elevations were performed by others. Our scope of services for the Phase 1 ESA will be discussed in a forthcoming separate report. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 3 B. Results B.1. Exploration Logs B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings are included in the Appendix. The logs identify and describe the geologic materials that were penetrated, and present the results of penetration resistance tests performed within them and laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples retrieved from them, and groundwater measurements. Strata boundaries were inferred from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because sampling was not performed continuously,the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may also occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. B.1.b. Geologic Origins Geologic origins assigned to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report were based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2)visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance data, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. B.2. Geologic Profile B.2.a. Geologic Materials The general geologic profile at the borings generally consists of 1/2 to 1 foot of topsoil (generally clayey or silty sand with organics), overlying glacially deposited silty sand,sand with silt and sand. However, some clayey sand and sandy lean clays were also found. The notable exceptions to this are the rather thick silt deposit found below the topsoil in boring ST-1,at the southeast area of the site and about 3 to 6 feet of fill at borings 5T-1 and ST-3. The penetration resistances in the granular soils ranged from 5 to 33 blows per foot (BPF), corresponding to relative densities of loose to dense. Most values were in the 9 to 18 range. The silt had BPF values of 18 to 22, indicating medium-dense conditions. INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 4 Penetration resistances in the glacially deposited clayey soils generally ranged from 2 to 22, indicating consistencies ranging from soft to very stiff. B.2.b. Groundwater Groundwater was not observed while drilling in any of the boreholes. It is likely that the groundwater levels at this site are below the levels our soil borings extended to. However,a wet layer of clay fill was noted in boring ST-1. This was a very soft layer and it is possible water was perched on the denser, less permeable silt layer,which started at about the 6-foot depth. Depending on the time of construction, perched groundwater may be present in this area,as well as other areas where impervious layers of soil are encountered beneath more permeable layers. Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater should also be anticipated. B.3. Laboratory Test Results The moisture content of the selected soil samples was determined to generally vary from approximately 7 to 18 percent, indicating that moisture contents of the soil samples tested were generally below, but in some cases, above its probable optimum moisture content. The exception occurs in the layer of soft clay tested from the 5-foot depth in boring ST-1,which had a moisture content of 32%, which,is well over its optimum moisture content. Two soil samples, one each from borings ST-2 and ST-3 were washed through a number 200 sieve. The amounts passing the number 200 sieve were 9 and 15 percent, respectively, classifying these soil samples as poorly graded sand with silt and silty sand. B.4. Infiltrometer Tests The double-ring infiltrometer testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) D 3385;Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of Soils in Field Using Double-Ring Infiltrometers. The test was performed using potable water and Marriott tubes were used to measure the infiltration rate. The testing was performed by Braun Intertec personnel on June 3, 2011.The tests were performed at the locations of two proposed infiltration basins along the east boundary of the site. The proposed basin at the northeast corner of the site is designated DRI-A and test for the basin to be built in the southeast quadrant of the site is DRI-B. NTE RTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 5 The tests were performed at the estimated basin bottom elevations which were about 4 feet below existing grade at DR1-A and 6 feet below existing grades at DRi-B. Excavations to these depths were completed by backhoe. Visual identification, and mechanical grain-size analysis testing based on size No. 200 sieve analysis, performed on samples of the soil present at the approximate test depths indicates that DRI-A had 16.5%, which classifies this soil a clayey sand. At DRI-B,the percent of the material passing the#200 sieve was 2.6%, which classifies this soil as a poorly graded sand with gravel. The results of the infiltration testing are attached to this report. The tests indicate that the infiltration rate of the in-place soil at DRI-A was 0.1 inches per hour(in/hr)following a test duration of 2 hours. The infiltration rate at DRi-B was approximately 24.4 in/hr after the 90-minute duration of the test. C. Basis for Recommendations C.1. Design Details A residential development is proposed to be constructed on the site. Preliminary plans indicate that 22 single-family house lots along with streets and underground utilities are planned for this site. Other features that were noted on the plans include infiltration swales and basins. Also, a City Trail will extend from this development to connect to the playfields to the south. C.1.a. Building Structure Loads We have assumed that bearing wall loads associated with the proposed residential construction will • range from 3 to 4 kips (3,000 to 4,000 pounds) per linear foot (klf) and column loads, if any, will be no greater than 75 kips per column. C.1.b. Pavements and Traffic Loads We have assumed that bituminous pavements, typical of residential neighborhoods, will be subjected to normal traffic conditions over an assumed design life of 20 years. C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes Existing ground surface elevations vary from about 922 to 940 across the site. The available design plans dated May 20, 2011 show the proposed garage and basement floor grades. Based on these grades, we anticipate that fill depths will likely be less than 10 feet. Similarly,cuts of less than 10 feet are also anticipated during site grading. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 6 C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed construction to the extent it was reported to us by others. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may have been made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details,we should be notified. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations. C.2. Design and Construction Considerations The geotechnical issues influencing design of the proposed residential development appear to be related to the depth of excavation needed to attain suitable bearing soils,variations in site elevations, and the condition of the onsite soils with respect to use as engineered fill. Also,the existing structures along with underground utilities and trench backfill soils will need to be removed. Based on the results of the current borings, it appears that most of the site would only require topsoil removal and near surface subcuts of surficial soft clay and clayey sand fill soils,to attain suitable bearing soils. The topsoil encountered is not suitable for house support or to be reused as engineered fill. At the southwest site corner(boring ST-1) about 6 feet of soft fill was encountered, which will need to be subcut. In addition, at the northwest area of the site, boring ST-3 found 3 feet of old fill soils,which will need to be subcut. It also appears that much of the sandy at this site may be drier than their optimum content and may require moisture conditioning to meet the minimum density requirements. D. Recommendations In accordance with our findings, below are our recommendations for construction of the proposed residential development, including utility installation, and street construction. D.1. House Pad and Pavement Subgrade Preparation D.1.a. Excavations Once the existing site structures along with underground utility lines and utility trench backfill are removed,we recommend removing the vegetation, topsoil,and any soft to rather soft clayey soil from within the house pad and roadway areas(including oversize areas). Also, any old fill soils encountered should be subcut. Table 1 below lists the anticipated depths of excavation at the boring locations. Based on the results of our soil borings, excavation depths in the house pad areas are expected to range from approximately 1/2 to 6 feet. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 7 Table 1. Anticipated Excavation Depths for Residential Construction Anticipated Depth of Approximate Bottom Boring Surface Elevation(ft) Excavation(ft) Elevation(ft) ST-1 932.3 6* 926* ST-2 934.6 1/2 934 ST-3 936.1 3 933 ST-4 931.6 4 927 1/2 ST-5 933.6 1 932 1/2 ST-6 938** 1 936** *Note that silt soils found at ST-1 can become disturbed from excavation activities and may require deeper subcts **Note that ground surface and excavation bottom elevations were estimated at boring ST-6 since boring was offset. Excavation depths will vary between the borings. Portions of the excavations may also be deeper than indicated by the borings. Contractors should also be prepared to extend excavations in wet or fine- grained soils to remove disturbed bottom soils. To provide lateral support to replacement backfill, additional required fill and the structural loads they will support,we recommend oversizing(widening)the excavations 1 foot horizontally beyond the outer edges of the building perimeter footings, or pavement limits, for each foot the excavations extend below bottom-of-footing or pavement subgrade elevations. Prior to placing engineered fill,we recommend that the exposed granular soils be surface compacted by a minimum of 5 passes by a large, self-propelled vibratory compactor. This is to densify the near surface bearing soils and to provide a more uniform bearing surface to support any additional required engineered fill and house loads. The exception to this occurs at Boring ST-1 where silt soils will likely be found at the subcut excavation bottom. Silts can become highly disturbed by excessive vibration so any surface compaction of the exposed silts should only be performed in a non-vibratory mode. Also, subcuts in silt soils should be performed with a smooth bucket backhoe. D.1.b. Excavation Dewatering This site appears to be relatively free draining and no groundwater was encountered in the soil borings at the time of our evaluation. However,there is some potential for localized perched groundwater to be encountered in excavations, especially in relatively low elevation areas. If encountered,we recommend removing groundwater from the excavations. Sumps and pumps can be considered for excavations in low-permeability silt-and clay-rich soils. INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 8 D.1.c. Selecting Excavation Backfill and Additional Required Fill If the bottoms of the excavations remain wet, or have water seeping into them, we recommend initially backfiiling over wet or submerged excavation bottoms with at least 2 feet of coarse sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a #40 sieve,and less than 10 percent of the particles passing a #200 sieve. This material appears to be present on most of this site. If the bottom of the excavations remain dry and stable, or after the sand has been placed, on-site soils free of organic soil and debris can be considered for reuse as backfill and fill. The clay soils, however, being fine-grained, will be more difficult to compact if wet or allowed to become wet,or if spread and compacted over wet surfaces. Most of the on-site soils are sand, but some clayey soil was encountered near the surface of most of the borings. Some of the upper clayey sand soils appear to have moisture contents above its probable optimum moisture content. As a result, prospective clayey fill soils may require moisture conditioning in order to attain proper compaction. Moisture conditioning of clays can be labor and time intensive, and is only recommend during summer months (approximately June through September). Also,the moisture contents of the sand soils appear to be somewhat low of their optimum moisture content and some wetting of these soils may be needed to achieve the recommended compaction levels. D.1.d. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill We recommend spreading backfill and fill in loose lifts of approximately 8 to 12 inches. We recommend compacting backfill and fill in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 2. The relative compaction of utility trench backfill should be evaluated based on the structure below,which it is installed, and vertical proximity to that structure. Table 2. Compaction Recommendations Summary Relative Compaction, percent Moisture Content Variance from Reference (ASTM D 698—standard Proctor) Optimum,percentage points Below foundations, less than 95 -1 to+3 for clayey soils 10 feet of fill ±3 for sandy soils Below foundations,greater than -1 to+2 for clayey soils 10 feet of fill 98 ±3 for sandy soils -1 to+3 for clayey soils Below slabs 95 ±3 for sandy soils Below pavements,within 3 feet 100 -1 to+1 for clayey soils of subgrade elevations ±3 for sandy soils Below pavements, more than 3 feet 95 -1 to+3 for clayey soils below subgrade elevations ±3 for sandy soils 90 -3 to+5 for clayey soils* Below landscaped surfaces* ±5 for sandy soils *Except for wall backfill.See Section D.3.of this report. BR AU N INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 9 If fill depths exceed 10 feet,the minimum compaction requirement should be increased to 98 percent. If fill is to be placed on slopes with a gradient steeper than a 5:1 (horizontal to vertical)grade,there is potential for instability, resulting in creep of the fill mass. In these cases, we recommend "benching" or excavating into the slopes at 5-foot vertical intervals to key the fill into the slope. We recommend each bench be a minimum of 10 feet wide. D.2. Spread Footings D.2.a. Embedment Depth For frost protection,we recommend embedding perimeter footings 42 inches below the lowest exterior grade. Interior footings may be placed directly below floor slabs. We recommend embedding building footings not heated during winter construction, and other unheated footings associated with decks, porches, stoops or sidewalks 60 inches below the lowest exterior grade. Attached garages are generally considered heated structures and may be supported by footings placed a minimum of 42 inches below outside finished grade. Foundations for porches or decks should be extended at least 5 feet below finished grade. The foundations should be constructed at a minimum 21/2 x 2 1/2-foot-wide footing tied with reinforcing steel to the foundation column. If a drilled shaft is utilized,the bottom of the shaft should be belled at the bottom an additional 12 inches. Belling these shafts may not be possible in clean sand soil. However,for either foundation type,the shaft or foundation column should be wrapped by a material that will not allow frozen soils to adhere to the foundations, potentially heaving them. The use of sono- tubes for shaft foundations is usually not sufficient to act as a bond break. D.2.b. Subgrade Improvement Prior to constructing foundations, we recommend that any exposed sandy soil be surface compacted by several passes by a large, self-propelled vibratory compactor. This is to densify the bearing soils and reduce the potential for these soils to settle after house construction. If a small amount of groundwater is present within the excavation prior to placing forms or reinforcement, we recommend placing a 6-to 12-inch layer of clear rock. The dear rock will provide a stable working surface, and will allow for the flow of water to a drain tile or sump pump. BRAIN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 10 D.2.c. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure We recommend sizing spread footings to exert a net allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot(psf). This value includes a safety factor of at least 3.0 with regard to bearing capacity failure. The net allowable bearing pressure can be increased by one-third its value for occasional transient loads, but not for repetitive loads due to traffic, or for other live loads from snow or occupancy. D.2.d. Settlement We estimate that total and differential settlements among the footings will amount to less than 1 and 1/2 inch, respectively, under the reported loads. In areas where more than 10 feet of fill are placed, greater settlements could occur if a construction delay is not provided. D.3. Basement Walls The following sections address soil parameters for basement wall design. Many of the following recommendations can also be incorporated into any preliminary retaining wall design that may occur on this site. If retaining walls are planned we recommend that additional soil borings and analyses be completed. D.3.a. Drainage Control We recommend installing subdrains behind the basement walls, adjacent to the wall footings, below the slab elevation. The subdrains could consist of perforated pipes embedded in washed gravel,which in turn, is wrapped in filter fabric. Perforated pipes encased in a filter"sock"and embedded in washed gravel, however, may also be considered. Alternative drainage systems could also be used. We recommend routing the subdrains to a sump and pump capable of routing any accumulated groundwater to a storm sewer or other suitable disposal site. General waterproofing of basement walls is recommended even with the use of free-draining backfill because of the potential cost impacts related to seepage after construction is complete. D.3.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill Unless a drainage composite is placed against the backs of the exterior perimeter basement walls,we recommend that backfill placed within 2 horizontal feet of those walls consist of sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a#40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a#200 sieve. Sand meeting this gradation appears to be the prevalent soil on this site. We recommend that the balance of the backfill placed against exterior perimeter walls also consist of sand, though it is our opinion that the sand may contain up to 20 percent of the particles by weight passing a#200 sieve. BRAUN 1 NTE RTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 11 We recommend a walk behind compactor be used to compact the backfill placed within about 5 feet of the basement walls. Further away than that, a self-propelled compactor can be used. Compaction criteria for below-grade walls should be determined based on the compaction recommendations provided above in Section D.1. Exterior backfill not capped with slabs or pavement should be capped with a low-permeability soil to limit the infiltration of surface drainage into the backfill. The finished surface should also be sloped to divert water away from the walls. D.3.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads Basement wall design can be based on active earth pressure conditions if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If rotation cannot be tolerated,then design should be based on at-rest earth pressure conditions. Rotation up to 0.002 times the wall height is generally required to activate active earth pressure conditions when walls are backfilled with sand*. Rotation up to 0.02 times the wall height is required when walls are backfilled with clay. * To design for sand backfill,excavations required for wall construction should be wide enough and flat enough so that sand is present within a zone that(1)extends at least 2 horizontal feet beyond the bottom outer edges of the wall footings(the wall heel, not the stem)and then(2)rises up and away from the wall at an angle no steeper than 60 degrees from horizontal.We anticipate these geometric conditions will be met if the excavations meet OSHA requirements for the types of soils likely to be exposed in the excavation,and the wall footings are cast against wood forms rather than any portion of the excavation. Recommended equivalent fluid pressures for wall design based on active and at-rest earth pressure conditions are presented below in Table 3. Assumed wet unit backfill weights, and internal friction angles are also provided. The recommended equivalent fluid pressures in particular assume a level backfill with no surcharge—they would need to be revised for sloping backfill or other dead or live loads that are placed within a horizontal distance behind the walls that is equal to the height of the walls. Our design values also assume that the walls are drained so that water cannot accumulate behind the walls. Table 3. Recommended Below-Grade Wall Design Parameters Equivalent Fluid Equivalent Fluid Wet Unit Weight Friction Angle Pressure,Active Case Pressure,At-Rest Case Backfill Soil (pcf) (deg) (pcf) (pcf) Sand 120 32 40 55 Silty Sand 125 30 45 65 Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the retaining wall or basement wall footings, and by sliding resistance along the bottoms of the wall footings. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 12 We recommend assuming a passive pressure equal to 375 pcf for sand or silty sand with sliding coefficients equal to 0.40. These values are un-factored. D.4. Interior Slabs D.4.a. Moisture Vapor Protection If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used,we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor retarder or barrier beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice risks trapping water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or barrier is placed,we recommend consulting with floor covering manufacturers regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. D.4.b. Radon In preparation for radon mitigation systems,we recommend that slabs on grade be constructed over a layer of gas permeable material consisting of a minimum of 4 inches of either clean aggregate, or clean sand overlain with geotextile matting suitable for venting the subgrade. The clean aggregate material should consist of sound rock no larger than 2 inches and no smaller than 1/4 inch. Sand should have less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a#40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. Above the gas permeable aggregate or sand, a polyethylene sheeting (6 mil minimum)should be placed. The sheeting should be properly lapped and penetrations through the sheeting sealed. Penetrations through the slab and foundation walls should also be sealed. D.S. Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs could be underlain with a mixture of sandy and clayey soil,which are considered moderately frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, unfavorable amounts of heaving could occur. Grading to direct surface drainage away from buildings helps limit the potential for saturation and subsequent heaving to occur. Still, even limited amounts of movement can create tripping hazards. One way to help limit the potential for heaving to occur is to remove frost-susceptible soils present below the overlying slab"footprints" down to bottom-of-footing grades or to a maximum depth of 5 feet below subgrade elevation,whichever is least,and replace them with non frost- susceptible(NFS) backfill consisting of sand having less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a#200 sieve. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 13 If the banks of excavations to remove frost-susceptible soils from below exterior slabs are not sloped, abrupt transitions between frost-susceptible and NFS backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may still occur. Such transitions could exist between exterior slabs and pavements, between slabs and sidewalks, and along the slabs themselves should excavations be confined only to the building entrances. NSF backfill is also likely to be more permeable than the soils it replaces, and so can also trap infiltrating surface drainage and groundwater that can contribute to heaving at transitions. To address these issues,we recommend: ■ Sloping the banks of excavations to remove frost-susceptible soils at a 3:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter gradient. • Sloping the bottoms of the excavations to drain away from the building. • Installing perforated drainpipes along the bottom outer edges of the excavations to collect and dispose of surface drainage and groundwater that could otherwise accumulate within the backfill and contribute to heaving. One alternative for reducing frost-related heave is to place at least 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation below the slabs and extend it approximately 4 feet beyond the outer edges of the slabs. The insulation may have to be buried below a cushion of sand or gravel to protect it during construction. Another alternative is to support the slabs on frost-depth footings, and suspending the slabs at least 4 inches above the underlying subgrade soils to accommodate heaving without it affecting the slabs. D.6. Pavements D.6.a. Subgrade Proof-Roll Prior to placing aggregate base material, we recommend proof-rolling pavement subgrades to determine if the subgrade materials are loose,soft or weak, and in need of further stabilization, compaction or sub- excavation and re-compaction or replacement. D.6.b. Design Sections Laboratory tests to determine an R-value for pavement design were not included in the scope of this project. Based on our experience with similar projects in the area, however, it is our opinion that an R-value of 50 can be assumed for design purposes if the subgrade consists of poorly graded sand with silt. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 14 Based upon typical traffic loads and an R-value of 50,we recommend a bituminous pavement section that includes a minimum of 3 1/2 inches of bituminous pavement(a 1 1/2-inch surface course over a 2-inch base course)over 8 inches of aggregate base material. Alternative pavement designs will also be acceptable if they are designed for a subgrade R-value of 50. The above pavement designs are based upon a 20-year performance life. This is the amount of time before major reconstruction is anticipated. This performance life assumes maintenance,such as seal coating and crack sealing, is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather,traffic conditions and maintenance. D.6.c. Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying crushed aggregate base meeting the requirements of Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT)Specification 3138 for Class 5. We recommend that the aggregate base be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. We recommend that the bituminous pavement be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical Rice density. D.6.d. Subgrade Drainage If there are areas of the site where the subgrade soils are not conducive to vertical drainage(clayey or highly silty subgrades)we recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points and about catch basins. The drainpipes should be placed in small trenches extended at least 8 inches below the granular subbase layer(if utilized)—or aggregate base material where no subbase is present. D.7. Utilities D.7.a. Subgrade Stabilization We anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding requirements. If localized soft areas are encountered at pipe invert elevations,we recommend placing a stabilizing aggregate beneath the pipe. The depth of the aggregate bedding will vary, however,a minimum of 6 inches and a maximum of 2 feet is commonly used. This should be evaluated in the field at the time of installation. D.7.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill We recommend selecting, placing and compacting utility backfill in accordance with the recommendations provided above in Section D.1. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 15 D.B. Construction Quality Control D.8.a. Excavation Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation and spread footing, slab-on-grade and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations, and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. D.8.b. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in excavation backfill and additional required fill placed below spread footings, slab-on-grade construction, beside foundation walls, behind basement walls, behind retaining walls, and below pavements. We recommend Marshall or Rice Specific Gravity tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids, and density tests to evaluate compaction. We also recommend slump,air content and strength tests of Portland cement concrete. D.8.c. Pavement subgrade Proof-Roll We recommend that proof-rolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications, or delineate the extent of additional pavement subgrade preparation work. D.8.d. Cold Weather Precautions If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen soils should be used as fill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94. Concrete should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below footings. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 16 E. Procedures E.1. Penetration Test Borings The penetration test borings were drilled with a truck-mounted core-and-auger drill equipped with hollow-stem auger. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586. Penetration test samples were taken at 21/2-or 5-foot intervals. Actual sample intervals and corresponding depths are shown on the boring logs. E.2. Material Classification and Testing E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification The geologic materials encountered were visually and manually classified in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice D 2488. A chart explaining the classification system is attached. Samples were placed in jars or bags and returned to our facility for review and storage. E.2.b. Laboratory Testing The results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples are noted on or follow the appropriate attached exploration logs. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures. E.3. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater as the penetration test borings were advanced, and again after auger withdrawal. The boreholes were then immediately backfilled. F. Qualifications F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions F.1.a. Material Strata Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations were developed from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth, and therefore strata boundaries and thicknesses must be inferred to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions,and can be expected to vary in depth, elevation and thickness away from the exploration locations. BRAUN INTERTEC 17555 Duck Lake Trail, LLC Project BL-11-02658 June 13, 2011 Page 17 Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until additional exploration work is completed, or construction commences. If any such variations are revealed, our recommendations should be re-evaluated. Such variations could increase construction costs, and a contingency should be provided to accommodate them. F.1.b. Groundwater Levels Groundwater measurements were made under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs,and interpreted in the text of this report. It should be noted that the observation periods were relatively short, and groundwater can be expected to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility F.2.a. Plan Review This report is based on a limited amount of information,and a number of assumptions were necessary to help us develop our recommendations. It is recommended that our firm review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications,and evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations,and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs and specifications. F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing It is recommended that we be retained to perform observations and tests during construction. This will allow correlation of the subsurface conditions encountered during construction with those encountered by the borings, and provide continuity of professional responsibility. F.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written approval,we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation,analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. F.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. BRAUN NTE RTEC Appendix 1 11 2. 1 �_ n1 1 , �: 4 BRAY N 1 _ 11 INTERTEC l 11001 Hampshire Avenue So. • • ` Minneapolis,MN 55438 { •I 5 PH.(952)995-2000 FAX(952)995-2020 IBase Dwg Provided By: v • SATHRE BERGQUIINC.1 I ST IN • I I • 1 1 L I_ — -IT r `, INFIL . %W 2 Tfi I— I '� INFILTRAnoq SWALE3'r T7^ Y4 r fe 7 .. ,,,. • 2 I l , I I I I I -- II tlt 10" r �" I 2 11 1, r I I 1 4 I I 11 I r .I r 1 1 >'"` I I k; /.1._ 1 �� i l.i I 11 ' 1 4 � II __ L{ • I I i i1 1 1T '� �`1-T I I�1 1 : ___ I'I• I 6 I I 1 .i". ,"1' 1 i.�1l II I I . �1- .-I. �� -` } 1�I.1, • eF 93,.56 I�..�•-I�_ I I I I / / �„�,[ eFszSss 4 •,...1..... I • ,' • /// Ilgi �,;L WO eFsm.ssr; ; �1- ( I I �I I II aF..:�: v SDI Lo9zaea 1 I ICJ ,� • .4 ',13i� ! I� I I 7 I /" _ I 1 1 �-� 1 I 1 W0 I I • �� 11 1 "r I I I n I — „ 4 \ 11 TF94osa I eF831b8 I I I I I -I - '\ \ 1- WO I I/� ,'I 1 k BF • J TF9C+4a9�.� I �� I� .�� 1 cF 949.o I WO I TF 9 9sa r I1 1 I 1 /I 4' e9 _ Lo 9zz.es / �,�Iv GF 838o I _ �' - .� I t I L0935.66 ¢ 'L ♦ _ � .� jL�1 ---- rl I _ hI� - E 1 1 I ; Lo I �~�V I TF 91Q33 r-� E,��- �����GF837A,� I /• 'a..iB II II �O `: y \-•,✓ y�i7F 92&33 1 '"O / GF 9490I !�t"'"ii i • I I TF&/,37 '. ' , ya / �- _l I I 9ai.A. _ GFszr.o: --„..., iv . .r,s,'' . "1.4 1 �" 4 4 4111.111_4,&,_'', .1 it I 1' :.kl ft-5 7.''''' ' •.:I. '. 1 75TH AIM �� ,/®� �. --1 TF9ao.0 �rr 1 � . .�� GF99T.9 q 1 �� it - Cl- I- o i GF 959A _ • I ` t/ !,r 4 I/ T` ��..`- TF SS7.33 I `j M .:� � ,a•` II,/�Y"�I~ cF5 1 I fA834.66� T}4 f'li `1\` - �''��y�,� '/ 93O19g<, �qg 932�� ;{{• C �■ :� YO J i I �, dI.�L "� ,. y _. TF•39O I 9F 931.9a + ' �- ." � ...,a.a^p9za. > ,` I ¢ Q co p \1 a,'1O 1 1 cFsaa I 1 .s9 1 .�I 1II GFeos' fi I // GF9zss w Z 7 ¢W x o I \\ 4r r rI Trs4vaa •1 LO9atea I Ir I�� Fea1.a 1 I II -`, �, I N�sza,n. TFsesss I -1 Q F " \. ! ! !I- WO I.i i z�LHi---/ I I: LO ' ...I eF943.o' T— -Gene !}..., Tnae:�t_..., .., 1 I I ~r �r I LO x i • O¢F Y Z / �� I�- `' ` 6F993.98 J I 1 TF94as9 I r r TF9„ ,.. .WO ,'I I u' I}, La9�zi,is I I'. : W I II II BF ea2se I I 9�a.ae I I j I �Q~ r I 1 5 ° 1�1 f f 1 I i:I I�_ I. BF s9a se 1'� I I 1 0-I u•I hI-- s - - ,® F" I �0 5192 Ii C.i , Al -Y_s i I I: ri • , } } o¢oYw_ • ,` rs-- 11 1 1•1 ST e.aaz:se I 1 1 I 1' I I , C]W U d 1 s N 1J 1'6,„ . NFICTRATro r r 10 1 . 1 � I 4_ i 0 z o er J ` 1 �__ rLi_1--- 1` I , � 6F- INFIL.e ], I ! I.., It JJ I I .��� �.., ,• Nm9z9.7 z, ra�— __rJ �I— — mac} '. -. �, I�1�- Li• P` :" I 1 - 2 H ui Z __ r`C.;, HwL 631.1 1:29,3 - I' S GI]RPINNLE lsi97Q.: 127"e�-• '" r..:c,'gam•., i INF t' D 1.,:' W > g`-+ -/• �r-----� ---- - } l'" -«\ .. ` . m 1' � : Fw .,_ � r 9 CO W W W • i „. ter-7 ...�-_ -C.�.. '- / _GH•A1 LINK.FEN E • n ON Pr{OP EIiTY CIN — � � CO U I I I I c o 1 1 1 - I I I 1 \� • , 1 I • • I• 1 l" N I I I 2 , :, 33 • • • m • N rSAN s :Barberry Lane - 4 • g E, N M Project No: BL1102658 I DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF j•� Drawing No: it-J BL110265$ I STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING �_` Scale: 1^=100 cd Drawn By: JAG o e DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF Date Drawn: 6!8l11 ._I INFILTRATION TEST Checked By: GRJ m 50' 0 100' Last Modified: 6113111 o - - a Sheet FIg: SCALE: 1"=100' of 7 BRAUNSM LOG OF BORING I NTE RTEC Braun Project BL-11-02658 BORING: ST-1 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Duck Trail Residential Development 0 17555 Duck Lake Trail Eden Prairie, Minnesota -0 DRILLER: J.Chermak METHOD: 31/4"HSA,Autohammer DATE: 6/2/11 [SCALE: 1"=4' as o Elev. Depth o feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC Tests or Notes c 932.3 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487,Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) ova a SC ' CLAYEY SAND, Organic, black, moist. Benchmark: Surface a— 931.4 0.9 .4 8 \ (Topsoil) , elevations were FILL • • ••• FILL: Clayey Sand,with Gravel, brown, moist. observed using GPS 1-1;— ;•;•; — technology. y 929.3 3.0 • • •• •• 3 • o FILL ••••• FILL: Lean Clay, brown,wet. 0— ••••• — •• t°' • X 2 32 •• 0 926.3 6.0 i•i• ' ML SILT, brown, moist, medium dense. 15_ (Glacial Till) _ co a) 0— /�_ 19 19 aa) — X 22 _ I 18 918.3 14.0 SM SILTY SAND,fine-to medium-grained, brown, moist, • N _ medium dense. 916.3 16.0 (Glacial Till) X 17 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger z — in the ground. — w 3 — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 11 feet — ;' immediately after withdrawal of auger. 1 — z I — Boring then backfilled. — a 0o — — Lo N N 'i 0 % — — N J 0 a. Q n z Z_ W — — 0 K a — _ l7 z Z — 2 0 m LL _ _ O O J BL-11-02658 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-1 page 1 of 1 BRAUN' LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL-11-02658 BORING: ST-2 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Duck Trail Residential Development 0 17555 Duck Lake Trail .= Eden Prairie, Minnesota DRILLER: J.Chermak .METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Autohammer DATE: 6/2/11 L SCALE: 1"=4' GElev. Depth Description of Materials o feet feet p BPF WL MC P200 Tests or Notes 934.6 0.0 Symbol (Soil- D2488 or D2487,Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) n 934 1 0 5 SP- :.•: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT,fine-to _ ' SM ::. medium-grained, slightly Organic, black, moist. SP I (Topsoil) - SM • POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT,fine-to medium-grained, brown, moist, medium dense. _- 12 > (Glacial Outwash)• c • o- 13 9 9 928.6 6.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT,fine-to _ SM medium-grained,with Silt lenses and a trace of Gravel, _ o • brown, moist, medium dense. - (Glacial Outwash) 13 9 co 12 1 14 920.6 14.0 SP : i : POORLY GRADED SAND,fine-to medium-grained, - brown, moist, medium dense. 918.6 16.0 (Glacial Outwash) X 13 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger - in the ground. - w - Water not observed to cave-in depth of 12 feet CO immediately after withdrawal of auger. z' Boring then backfilled. - - a O _ Co w 'i O _ _ ug Z_ tJ - O a _ Z l7 Z z Z O O O BL-11-02658 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-2 page 1 of 1 BRAUN' LOG OF BORING I NTE RTEC Braun Project BL-11-02658 BORING: ST-3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Duck Trail Residential Development 0 17555 Duck Lake Trail .5 Eden Prairie, Minnesota a DRILLER: J.Chermak METHOD: 31/4"HSA,Autohammer DATE: 6/2/11 [SCALE: 1"=4' a Elev. Depth o• feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC P200 Tests or Notes • 936.1 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) X I P36 0,1 0 1 r1 BIT S ; 2 inches of Bituminous. • — FILL •;•;• FILL: Silty Sand,fine-to medium-grained, brown, — : moist, medium dense. 4••• (Glacial Outwash) — N 933.1 3.0 :':': a 5 o SM SILTY SAND,fine-to medium-grained,with Gravel, l� o— brown, moist, medium dense to loose. — (Glacial Outwash) X23 8 Q U_ - N N o X 10 15 9 (L) 927.1 9.0 SC CLAYEY SAND,with Gravel, brown,wet, stiff. (Glacial Till) — // 13 924.1 12.0 I\ CL % SANDY LEAN CLAY, brown,wet, rather stiff. (Glacial Till) _X 11 • 920.1 16.0 / X 9 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger • — in the ground. — W — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 12 feet — immediately after withdrawal of auger. Z — — Boring then backfilled. up w ••1 N _ J 8 cZ G — a O J BL-11-02658 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-3 page 1 of 1 BRAUNSM LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL-11-02658 BORING: ST-4 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Duck Trail Residential Development 0 17555 Duck Lake Trail Eden Prairie, Minnesota n DRILLER: J.Chermak METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Autohammer DATE: 6/2/11 SCALE: 1"=4' o Elev. Depth feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC Tests or Notes 931.6 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) CO SC 7 � CLAYEY SAND, Organic, black, moist. _ 930.5 1.1 � (Topsoil) SC % CLAYEY SAND, brown, moist, soft. — (Glacial Till)— _g 2 c 927.6 4.0 SP • POORLY GRADED SAND,fine-to medium-grained, with Silt lenses and Gravel, brown, moist, loose to • medium dense. X 16 9 — (Glacial Outwash) ct N— a) 0_ _Q 14 7 L1 — � 15 9 915.6 16.0 V 30 no recovery. END OF BORING. I` Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger z — in the ground. — W — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 feet — �' immediately after withdrawal of auger. ' Boring then backfilled. m — — a l7 N '-I O _ N J O ire IJ _ W — Z Z , 0 co • 0 9 BL-11-02658 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-4 page 1 of 1 BRAUNSM LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL-11-02658 BORING: ST-5 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch. Duck Trail Residential Development 0 17555 Duck Lake Trail Eden Prairie, Minnesota a DRILLER: J.Chermak METHOD: 31/4"HSA,Autohammer DATE: 612111 SCALE: 1"=4' 5 Elev. Depth o feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 933.6 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USACE EM1110-1-2908) co X 932.7 0.9 SC CLAYEY SAND, Organic, black, moist. a�- SM (Topsoil) f 8 SILTY SAND,fine-to medium-grained, brown, moist, - loose. - - (Glacial Outwash) -� 5 Q 9929.6 4.0 SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT,fine-to — SM medium grained,with Gravel, brown, moist, loose to dense. 9 - (Glacial Outwash) — 'n _ — N O w _� 12 ai_ v) - I` 33 922.6 11.0 CL % SANDY LEAN CLAY,with Gravel, brown,wet,very stiff. (Glacial Till) f — j —� 22 919.6 14.0 SP POORLY GRADED SAND,fine-to medium-grained, N — with Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) ,, 917.6 16.0 X 9 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger Z - in the ground. - w — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 12 feet - c immediately after withdrawal of auger. ' Boring then backfilled. m l7 00 m N 8 _ — a a _ _ Z l7 O m LL _ 0 O BL-11-02658 Braun Intertec Corporation ST-5 page 1 of 1 BRAUN' LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL-11-02658 BORING: ST-6 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Offset 130 feet south&25 feet east. Duck Trail Residential Development See attached sketch. 0 17555 Duck Lake Trail sg Eden Prairie, Minnesota a DRILLER: J.Chermak METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Autohammer DATE: 6/2/11 SCALE: 1"=4' m o Elev. Depth o feet feet Description of Materials BPF WL MC Tests or Notes 938.0 0.0 Symbol (Soil-ASTM D2488 or D2487, Rock-USAGE EM1110-1-2908) X 937.2 0.8 SC CLAYEY SAND, Organic, black, moist. Note: Elevation of ST-6 • — SP- • ! \ (Topsoil) F estimated from available SM • POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT,fine-to topography. • — •• medium-grained,with Gravel, brown, moist, loose to — medium dense. _� 9 Q— (Glacial Outwash) a o— • X9 7 • — m _v 27 N 929.0 9.0 SC f • CLAYEY SAND, brown,wet, soft. (Glacial Till) X �� 3 926.0 12.0 SM • SILTY SAND,fine-grained, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Till) _ 7 ,71 N X7 922.0 16.0 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 15 feet of hollow-stem auger ▪ — in the ground. — W 3 — Water not observed to cave-in depth of 10 feet — co immediately after withdrawal of auger. z' — — Boring then backfilled. — m a (o O J Z Z V _ ▪ — LL — 0 9 BL-11-02658 Braun Intertec Corporation sT-6 page 1 of 1 Double Ring Infiltrometer Test Results A Test Number: DRI#A Test Location: Infiltration Pond A INTERIEC Project Number: BL-11-02658 Date: 6/3/2011 Depth: 4 feet below grade Material: Clayey Sand (SC) - brown Time Measured Drop Infiltration Rate (minutes) (centimeters) (in/hr) 15 1.8 0.2 30 1.4 0.2 45 1.1 0.1 60 0.9 0.1 75 0.6 0.0 90 0.8 0.1 105 1.2 0.1 120 0.7 0.0 Average Infiltration Rate (in/hr) 0.1 Infiltration Rate vs. Time 10.0 1 L I _• I ! L _ ! L I , I I _ — _ — 1 '_ i _ - r —L —, t,— —.1. Et __ I . — -r r _' .„..._4,____!_! �I �_'— 9.0 --=J r_ .mil _ ;— -___�� -_'--_f--:—.L-.._._ _ JTi—.: C__;_J ...__;_—t__,_.. ..,._. -- 7.0 — t 1 r L —I —, C— __ _ t l_i._L —_� +—i__ ._t__J_...___•;_— _!_.--'—. I-- _. .____I.__-.i_ ___LJ �__ t_ - ITI L I — —! — _ � _ - CU 1-7 co __) —.L.—_ I—1-1-_—.___.J—�.—.I.- i ! ._I.._._G_J __..�-_L =r ! - --. I_,_ I r-� c_�._1 t= — — 40 —�!�t — L -! I f+—: -H-— L . £ 3.0 ___...r_,_,_;.___;_,__......„_.....,r i _, , i ! , LJ.H!__,__ s. .� _ L _";—__,r'L_ , r — . — 2.0 —I-- _ L- I — — „___ I — � CFt II _ 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time(minutes) Test performed by Braun Intertec personnel in general accordance with ASTM D 3385 Double Ring Infiltrometer Test Results BRAUNTest Number: DRI B Test Location: Infiltration Pond B I N T E RT E C Project Number: BL-11-02658 Date: 6/3/2011 Depth: 6 feet below grade Material: Poorly-graded Sand (SP)with gravel, brown Time Volume Infiltration Rate (minutes) (gallons) (in/hr) 15 3.2 26.1 30 3.1 25.3 45 3.1 25.3 60 2.7 22.1 75 2.8 22.9 90 3.0 24.5 Average Infiltration Rate (in/hr) 24.4 Infiltration Rate vs. Time 50.0 40.0 -c • 30.0 ea • cc is 20.0 4 c 10.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time(minutes) Test performed by Braun Intertec personnel in general accordance with ASTM D 3385 Manley Development, LLC July 28, 2011 Mayor and Council Members City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344-4485 Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council, If you choose to follow the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve our Prairie Ridge development,we would also like to request the City Council consider approving an early grading permit as well. We would like to start the site work as soon as possible in order to insure the completion of all the development site work this fall and to help facilitate our builder group getting started on model homes for the upcoming Parade of Homes events this fall and in the spring of 2012. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Sava/Mcwi,leey Manley Development, LLC 9262 Albright Court Inver Grove Heights,MN 55077 APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY,JULY 11,2011 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: Matt Fyten, John Kirk, Katie Lechelt, Jacob Lee, Jerry Pitzrick, Kevin Schultz, Jon Stoltz, Travis Wuttke STAFF MEMBERS: Michael Franzen, City Planner Rod Rue, City Engineer Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Julie Krull, Recording Secretary I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE—ROLL CALL Chair Stoltz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Kirk was absent. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Stoltz stated Franzen had an addition to the Planners Report, the Bear Path Trail Resolution. MOTION by Lechelt, seconded by Wuttke, to approve the amended agenda. Motion carried 7-0. III. MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 11, 2011 MOTION by Schultz, seconded by Lechelt, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. Pitzrick and Wuttke abstained. IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS V. PUBLIC MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PRAIRIE RIDGE by Manley Development. Location: 17555 Duck Lake Trail Request for: EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 2 • Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.69 acres • Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres • Preliminary Plat on 9.69 acres into 22 lots and 1 outlot Lechelt excused herself from this discussion because she worked on the project. Bill Coffman, of Coffman Development Services, is representing Manley Development on this project. He thanked Staff for working on the project with them and thanked the neighbors for their participation in their meetings. He utilized the overhead projector to show the plan for the project. He stated they are proposing to develop 22 lots on 10 acres of land and pointed out this would allow nice deep yards without the aspect of large homes. He stated there is a very nice street scape and there is a contemporary feel coming into the project. They will also be adding a trail that ties into an existing trail to the north. He stated Bob Molstad will talk about storm water. They have two storm water ponds and three infiltration swales set up. Mr. Coffman stated there will be 2 to 3 custom home builders building in this project with prices ranging from $450,000 - $650,000 for the lot and home together. He pointed out they have reasonable home sizes and prices and feels this is a good project. Chair Stoltz asked Mr. Coffman what concerns he took from the homeowners when they were making their plans. Mr. Coffman said they were not going to construct McMansions in the area; which was a concern. And also landscaping was a concern. They were planting more trees on site at their expense. He stated another concern was the added traffic at Duck Lake Trail and he would leave that up to staff to discuss. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen to review the staff report. Franzen stated staff is recommending approval according to the recommendations in the staff report. Pitzrick stated he hopes the developer is successful in selling the lots by 2013, but asked how long they will be maintained if they are not sold. Mr. Coffman stated they will be constantly maintaining the property. Wuttke asked stafff was if there was a concern about subgrade soil on the site. Rue stated he knows the soil is granular but is not concerned. Chair Stoltz opened the meeting up for public input. Ben Johnson, of 6908 Barberry Lane, and Nelson Gould of 6932 Barberry Lane came up together. Mr. Johnson gave Chair Stoltz a list of concerned residents. Mr. Johnson stated he is representing the neighbors in the area and stated his concern is that most homes in the area were built in the 60's and he would like the surrounding homes to conform more to theirs. He feels the homes would be too large for the area. He asked if they would be 2-story homes or ramblers. Mr. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 3 Coffman stated it would be a mixture of the two, and the market would dictate what they ultimately will be. Mr. Johnson stated he has a concern with the lot lines because he will have two homes ultimately in his back yard. Nelson Gould stated a lot of these homes would be much bigger than the existing homes in the area. Currently there are a lot of ramblers in the area and a lot of the new homes will be three story homes. Mr. Johnson stated changing the lot size would change the character of the neighborhood. Chair Stoltz asked if Mr. Johnson gave the list of neighbors to the project proponent. Mr. Johnson said he had not given the project proponent a copy of the list of names he gave to Chair Stoltz. Mr. Gueld said infiltration run-off is an issue with this project. Mr. Johnson stated there is concern with people parking in the cul-de-sac to use the park. Barb Soderberg, of 6900 Barberry Lane, stated she is at the bottom of the S, where they are placing the homes. It is a hill and she is at the bottom of it and is concerned with water run-off. Bob Molstad stated they are routing water around the homes into the pond. Rue stated they have reviewed their plans and are fine with the way they are proposed. Ms. Soderberg asked, when looking at the map, did Staff take into account where the elevation changes. Rue stated that was taken into account. Ms. Soderberg asked what would happen in the future if they had water issues. Rue stated they would try and work out different things with the homeowners so this would not happen. Chair Stoltz asked what would happen after a year if existing neighbors had water issues. Rue stated if it is within a year or two, the developer would be responsible. He pointed out there is plenty of new storm sewers in the area and it is not a concern. Chair Stoltz asked how long the developer would be responsible. Rue said as long as the bonds are active they are responsible. Mr. Johnson asked if the Watershed District is aware of this project. Rue stated the Watershed District is aware of this project because the project proponent has to get a permit from them. Schultz asked Rue if there were issues with water run-off due to development, does it typically happen within the first 2 years. Rue stated yes, the issues will show up quickly. Pitzrick asked what the height requirements are for the homes. Franzen stated the height restrictions are 40 feet. Pitzrick commented if you line up new lot lines with old lot lines, you end up with a bigger lot, which could result in bigger homes. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 4 Fyten asked the project proponent if the two neighborhood meetings were well attended. Mr. Coffman stated approximately 50 people attended each meeting. Chair Stoltz commented that initially the project proponent said he met with neighbors and stated everything was fine but now Mr. Johnson brings a list of 27 homeowners opposing the project and because of that he does not feel comfortable passing the project. Schultz agreed with Chair Stoltz. Curt Manley stated they were only supposed to have one meeting and they had two. He pointed out they were very accommodating to homeowners and Mr. Johnson never spoke at either of the meetings and he felt it was rude he brought up all of these issues tonight and not before. Ms. Soderberg stated she thought it was unfortunate the project proponent felt sandbagged by the homeowner,but felt he was very unprofessional. She stated we as homeowners have not had time to discuss this project. Scott Carlson, of 8150 Drexel, representing the trust in this project, stated he sat here tonight and was shocked. He is surprised this is the first time they have heard backlash in regards to this project and does not understand what more time will accomplish. He would hope the Commission would move forward with this project. Mr. Manley stated he meant not disrespect to anyone. Franzen stated in regards to the neighborhood meetings, they are for the neighbors to become familiar with the builders and to get more information about the project so when they come to a Planning Commission Meeting, they can say what they like or dislike about the project. Chair Stoltz stated he is on the Commission to represent the citizens of Eden Prairie and thinks it is a good idea to have another neighborhood meeting. Mr. Carlson said he does not know what another meeting would accomplish and does not know what else to do. Wuttke stated he is sympathetic to both sides but does not see what a third meeting would accomplish. He would like to see this project move forward. Lee asked Franzen if the project proponent and Commission could meet again before the next City Council meeting. Franzen stated that they could meet again because there are two Planning Commission meetings before the next City Council meeting. Lee stated he could go either way on this project. He could see it move forward, but if the project proponent could meet with the neighbors before the City Council meeting that would be great. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 5 Schultz said he was in favor of a continuance before,because he was a little blindsided with the way things transpired in the meeting tonight. He would like to see both sides in more of a compromise and would still like to see a continuance. Pitzrick stated he thinks what is proposed is a good, balanced project and would be in favor of it, but would also be okay with a continuance. Fyten stated he was concerned because both meetings were well attended and was surprised with the reaction to the meeting tonight. He does not know what a third meeting would reveal and would be in favor of moving forward. Stoltz stated he is in favor of a continuance and it is 3 to 3 because Lechelt cannot vote. Lee stated he is in favor of the project as it stands. Mr. Manley stated he does not mind having another meeting but pointed out it is hard to get funding for this project and he would have to have the builders come out again. He stated they gave the neighbors 30 day notices for each meeting and did everything they could. Lee addressed the homeowners in the audience and told them even though the project is approved at the Planning Commission level they can still attend the City Council meeting and object. Dave Shold, of 6941 Boyd Avenue, stated he went to the informational meetings. He said he wants to make sure both sides are heard. Schultz commented he was disappointed this information came up at the eleventh hour. He stated City Staff has done a great job on this and he knows it will get approved by the City Council, but he feels another meeting with the neighbors is not going to delay the project. He pointed out the project proponent is within the parameters of the project. Chair Stoltz said right now he does not feel he can give the City Council clear direction on this project and would like to see a continuance. Pitzrick stated he sees the meeting as a sharing of ideas and not a meeting to come up with different alternatives. Lee concurred. Pitzrick also stated he would like to see a member of City Staff attend the meeting and said at this point, he would be in favor of the project as is. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen if they could put in an amendment that they have another neighborhood meeting before the project goes to City Council. Franzen stated they could put that in as an amendment, but looking at what is on the table here, the only thing the project proponent would have to change is the zoning EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 6 district and nothing else. If they have a meeting, nothing major will get changed, only what is dictated by the Commission tonight. Mr. Manley said during the first neighborhood meeting they did not even have a development plan. In both meetings it was stressed that larger lots mean larger homes and they have brought in screening for the neighbors. He pointed out they would be in favor of a continuance, but they are concerned with the investors and how they will perceive this. MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Lee, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Lee, to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.69 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.69 acres. Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.69 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 9.69 acres into 22 lots and 1 outlot, based on plans stamped dated July 6, 2011 and the staff report dated July 8, 2011 with an amendment that another neighborhood meeting be set up by the project proponent prior to the August 16th City Council meeting. Motion carried 4-2-1. Lechelt abstained. Chair Stoltz encouraged Mr. Carlson to work with the neighbors and the neighbors to work with the project proponent to come together on this project. Schultz left the meeting. VII. PLANNERS' REPORT VIII. MEMBERS' REPORT IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Lee, seconded by Wuttke, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Public Hearings 08/16/11 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community GE Capital Eco Experience VIII. C. Development/Planning Janet Jeremiah/Regina Rojas Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 42 acres; and • Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 11.19acres, and Zoning District Amendment in the Office District on 11.19 acres; and • Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Staff and Commission recommendations and Council conditions; and • Approve and Authorize Issuance of a Grading Permit for the GE Capital Eco Experience project subject to release by the City Engineer upon determination that the final contract documents conform to plans stamp dated August 1, 2011, as approved by the City Council; and • Approve and Authorize Issuance of a footing and foundation permit for the GE Capital Eco Experience Project subject to release by the Chief Building Official that the building permit conforms to plans stamp dated August 1, 2011, as approved by the City Council. Synopsis The proposed use of the property is for an Eco Experience Center. The plan includes a 6,620 square foot two story office building with a ground level garage for 12 vehicles, 6 charging stations for electric vehicles, and a .44 mile driving course for electric vehicles. For this area of the property, the 1978 approved plan included future development of 360,000 square feet in 3 buildings and 3-multi level parking decks. In 1997 GE Capital received City approval of an amendment to the 1978 plan showing the same square footage,but in a different arrangement for the building and parking. Waivers are requested for building height and exterior materials. Background Information The planned unit development waivers are: 1. A height waiver from 30 feet to 32.5 feet. The increase in height adds architectural interest to the building. 2. An exterior materials waiver from 75%to 56% for the use of brick, glass, natural stone, cast stone, cultured stone, architectural precast or precast panel. The plan is 56%brick and glass and 44% alucobond(aluminum composite material)panel. The 120-Day Review Period Expires on October 22, 2011. Conservation Commission Recommendation GE Capital gave a presentation to the commission at their May 10, 2011 meeting. The plan incorporates the commission recommendations relating to rainwater gardens, native grasses, permeable pavers, and educational signage. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project at the July 11, 2011 meeting with direction to revise the exterior building elevations to 55% of the exterior materials required in the 75% category for office zoning. The plan has been revised to meet the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Resolution-PUD Concept 2. Resolution-Preliminary Plat 3. Staff Report-June 10, 2011 4. Location Map 5. Land Use Map 6. Zoning Map 7. Aerial photo 8. Planning Commission Approved Minutes-July 11, 2011 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF GE CAPITAL ECO EXPERIENCE CENTER FOR GEL CO CORPORATION WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on July 11, 2011, on GE Capital Eco Experience Center by Gelco Corporation and considered their request for approval of the PUD Concept plan and recommended approval of the request to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 16, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. GE Capital Eco Experience Center,being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans stamp dated August 1, 2011. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission July 11, 2011. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk EXHIBIT A PUD Concept - (GE Capital Eco Experience Center) Legal Description: Outlots A to J, inclusive; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 3; All in Gelco First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota A portion being registered land described as: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive, Block 3; Outlots H, I and J, That part of Lot 1, Block 2 and of Outlots A, B, F and G all embraced within Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1509, Gelco First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Certificate Number: 607153 Zoning Amendment Legal Description Before: Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4, Block 3 and Outlots G, H, I and J, Gelco First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Legal Description After: Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Gelco Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GE CAPITAL ECO EXPERIENCE CENTER FOR GELCO CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of GE Capital Eco Experience Center for Gelco Corporation stamp dated August 1, 2011, and consisting of 11.19 acres into 1 lot and 1 outlot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Regina Rojas, Planner II DATE: July 8, 2011 SUBJECT: GE Capital Eco Experience Center APPLICANT/ OWNER: GE Capital LOCATION: 3 Capital Drive 120 DAY REVIEW: Expires October 22, 2011 REQUEST: • Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 42 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 42 acres • Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 42 acres • Site Plan Review on 42 acres • Preliminary Plat on 42 acres Staff Report—GE Capital Eco Experience Center July 8, 2011 Page 2 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided and zoned office. Surrounding land is guided and zoned office. For this area of the property, the 1978 approved plan included future development of 360,000 square feet in 3 buildings and 3-multi level parking decks. In 1997 GE Capital received City approval of an amendment to the 1978 plan showing the same square footage, but in a different arrangement for the building and parking. SITE PLAN The proposed use of the property is for an Eco Experience Center.The plan includes a 6,620 square foot two story office building with a ground level garage for 12 vehicles, 6 charging stations for electric vehicles, and a .44 mile driving course for electric vehicles. The Base Area Ratio is .007 and the Floor Area Ratio is 0.015. City Code permits up to a 0.30 BAR and 0.50 FAR. The building meets the setback requirements. The plan meets the parking requirements. PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposed lot meets the dimensional and lot size requirements for the office zoning district. CONSERVATION COMMISSION GE Capital gave a presentation to the commission at their May 10, 2011 meeting. The following were recommendations from the commission to GE Capital to include in their proposed development plans: 1. Use permeable asphalt 2. Use permeable pavers 3. Include rainwater gardens 4. Use native grasses to reduce the need for irrigation. 5. Use rainwater barrels to capture roof drainage. 6. Include educational signage around rainwater gardens and porous pavers. 7. Contact the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for environmentally friendly 2 Staff Report—GE Capital Eco Experience Center July 8, 2011 Page 3 stormwater management techniques. The plan shows the use of rainwater gardens, native grasses, permeable pavers, and educational signage. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS 1. A height waiver from 30 feet to 32.5 feet. The increase in height adds architectural interest to the building. 2. An exterior materials waiver from 75% to 30.7%. The proposed exterior materials are as follows: • Limestone panel - 14.3% • Glass - 16.4% • Alucabond panel -44.9% • EFIS - 24.4% Limestone panel and glass are permitted material in the 75% category. Alucabond( an aluminum metal panel) and EFIS (stucco) are permitted in the 25% category. Staff recommends either of the following. • Increase the amount of glass and limestone panel to a total of 75% of the building exterior. • Any combination of materials currently permitted in the 75% category. These are brick glass, natural stone, cast stone, cultured stone, architectural precast and precast panel. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Bioinfiltration basins and porous pavers will be used to accommodate stormwater runoff. LANDSCAPING AND TREE REPLACEMENT Tree replacement required is 11 inches for this site. The landscaping requirement is 21 caliper inches. A total of 33 caliper inches is provided meeting code. 3 Staff Report—GE Capital Eco Experience Center July 8, 2011 Page 4 SIGNS There are no freestanding or building wall signs proposed. Educational signage is proposed next to the rainwater bioinfiltration basin and porous pavers near the building. SITE LIGHTING Parking lot lighting is LED downcast-cutoff fixtures on maximum 20-foot high poles. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Option 1 Staff recommends approval of the following: • Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 42 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 42 acres • Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 42 acres • Site Plan Review on 42 acres • Preliminary Plat on 42 acres This approval is based on plans dated June 30, 2011, subject to the recommendations of this Staff Report, and the following: 1. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Install erosion control at the grading limits of the property for review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. B. Submit samples of exterior building materials and colors for review. 3. The following waivers are granted through the PUD for the project: 4 Staff Report—GE Capital Eco Experience Center July 8, 2011 Page 5 A. A height waiver from 30 feet to 32.5 feet. B. An exterior materials waiver from 75%to 30.7%. Option 2 Recommend a continuance of the project to the July 25, 2011 Planning Commission meeting and direct the proponent to revise the plans as follows: A. Revise the plans to conform to the exterior building material requirements of the Office zoning district 5 Area Location Map - GE Capital Eco Experience Center Address: 3 Capital Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 I ij I Lake Smetana Golden Triangle Drive i. iViking Drive ��L `i: 494 J �� •rim` VI G DR 9 O _ _ _ _ W78THST 7grip.7(11 :I _ eA...c?. o West 78th Street \.i i \ , ` Anderson Lake NW 1 0 0 —111, ,t � � ��111110�� Kiawah Drive pr*A# FLUP -' .e ' ' — in Ai0V, Cr El \- %J .-iticS - N - IIC /* mum mots / 111 OQ IIIIIIIMO "1/1111W \r'll'T A_____ Z i II ,. , 84 1,680 ' -et :.�III . . 1W./0 .. .�� =; _ — — ,,„,,.., •.. •. ■� ■, . Anderson Lake SW Guide Plan Map GE Capital Eco Experience Center 3 Capital Drive, Eden Prairie, MN Viking Drive ilk 494 VIKING DR imiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ......._ 1111 W78THST r ...., West 78th Street lif _......41.--. cf i , Kiawah Drive o 1 Anderson , . ... , ...r;� of � _A ,,,�►,, e , e Lake 00, i4.-,,, ,E=J' "�^vPra `- La • - Guide -,,ig/ Cpri-1707 ► 000-20 1 Legend N Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre Neighborhood Commercial Streams Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre - Community Commercial Principal Arterial ��A Low Density/Public/Open Space - Regional Commercial —A Minor Arterial Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre -Town Center -B Minor Arterial DATE Approved 03-19-03 DATE Revised 12-06-06 SI Major Collector DATE Revised 01-07-05 DATE Revised 03-01-07 E D E N n Medium Density Residential/Office - Park/Open Space J DATE Revised 11-07-05 DATE Revised 06-01-07 Minor Collector DATE Revised 02-23-06 DATE Revised 10-01-07 1 High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre - Public/Quasi-Public DATE Revised 03-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-08 DATE Revised 06-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-09 WI Airport Golf Course PRAIRIE Office - Church/Cemetary V/ Office/Industrial Open Water Mnw op .MEt m_ ®�o.a„ .,N®''''7 . 1e,0® LIVE•wORK•OREAM VA Office/Public/Open Space Right-Of-Way 0.25 0.1125 0 - Industrial I I Miles Zoning Map GE Capital Eco Experience Center 3 Capital Drive, Eden Prairie MN a ri \3 ..... 1 -Smetana r,,Nt- _ I Viking Driv_i * --. o , 494 A , \ , ,,.,,, VIKING DR W nil u-s r -- i f r o (4.7 7 G� West 78th Street 4%....4111111' —....-7, 0 0 Nur' Kiawah Drive] N— y , � 4 Anderson 4" a 4 "' B S , 41 o wake 1. r• D.... • of . - n Prairie Zoni Rural -Regional Commercial Shoreland Management Classifications N R1-44 One Family-44,000 sf.min. TC-C I NE I Natural Environment Waters R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. n TC-R I RD I Recreational Development WatersA IM.. r• I,/.. 1.1 R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. al TC-MU I GD I General Development Waters(Creeks Only) R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. Industrial Park-2 Acre Min, P7Z 100- Year Floodplain EDEN RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A.max. Industrial Park- 5 Acre Min. Up dated through approved Ordinances#26-2008 -RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A.max. General Industrial-5 Acre Min. Ordinance#33-2001(BFI Addition)approved,but not shown on this map edition PRAIRIE Office J Public Date:March 1,2009 Neighborhood Commercial I Golf Course In case of discrepancy related to a zoning classitmaaon on this zoning map,the ordinance LIVE•WORK•DREAM and attached legal description on file at Eden Paine Ciry Center will prevail. E.Community Commercial Water -Highway Commercial Right of Way 0 0.15 0.3 -Regional Service Commercial .w a,_o...m..��mo..m._..®..g..o.,.,, Miles ..,_..a.0..m ..,,mo, Aerial Map - GE Captial Eco Experience Center Address: 3 Capital Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 S Tq � ri I 1 .- FgC IrM 4, II( / ake Smeta Golden Triangle Drive M x -. rit 1 Viking Drive : - 494 \\ _ ___ ___ - ? VIKING DR i - _ __ _ _________ _ T.1.‘.....".'''','" r prirml.,0 1/4wilve _ � West 78th Street Anderson Lakes ?� 010 ,..kwt '.! c _ �� �µKM , w ` i. r -.4, Kiawah Drive it ., ,,,,, , . .4,,,• it kk,\ i Ablik4,t, '*, .. ''''gr 11110 , cI } - vitti- N- ,;.- minnow- 44ritsi,„--' ,A-4-t-.-,5, - lij op Irk A , 4 I I**4' 4.... A.::,. .;1 � , �` rIlk° litiii ®4 i 1,680 Feet NI" dnBi l.7. e __ i .. 1111w IL APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY,JULY 11,2011 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: Matt Fyten, John Kirk, Katie Lechelt, Jacob Lee, Jerry Pitzrick, Kevin Schultz, Jon Stoltz, Travis Wuttke STAFF MEMBERS: Michael Franzen, City Planner Rod Rue, City Engineer Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Julie Krull, Recording Secretary I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE—ROLL CALL Chair Stoltz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Kirk was absent. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Stoltz stated Franzen had an addition to the Planners Report, the Bear Path Trail Resolution. MOTION by Lechelt, seconded by Wuttke, to approve the amended agenda. Motion carried 7-0. III. MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 11, 2011 MOTION by Schultz, seconded by Lechelt, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. Pitzrick and Wuttke abstained. IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS V. PUBLIC MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. GE CAPITAL ECO EXPERIENCE CENTER by GE Capital Corporation Location: 3 Capital Drive EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 2 Request for: • Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 42 acres • Planned Unit Development District Review on 42 acres • Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 42 acres • Site Plan Review on 42 acres • Preliminary Plat on 42 acres Deb Frodl, Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer, of GE Capital Fleet Services, stated they have refined their plans since the last time they have been here. She stated they are building a 6,620 square foot Eco Center that will have offices, a garage for vehicles, charging stations for electric vehicles and a driving course. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen to review the staff report. Franzen stated on page 3 of the staff report there are two options the Commissioners should consider. Staff recommendation is either for approval of the project as it is with the waivers or continue it to the July 25 meeting with direction to revise the exterior materials to conform to code. Franzen stated he has received two emails in regards to this project. The first email was from Donald Nelson, of 10878 Kiawah Drive. He stated the vehicles should only be allowed to drive on the track during normal business hours, 8-5, and should only be passenger vehicles. The second email was from Terry Pearson, of 10827 Leeping Deer Lane. She wanted the testing of vehicles to occur during business hours and she does not support the aluminum exterior on the building and stated it should support the A class office classification with landscaping appropriate. Charles Howley, HTPO, Civil Engineer, commented on the second email stating they will comply with the MPCA daytime standards. Paxton Waters, licensed architect for the project, stated they started this project in December and at that time they were just considering the driving course for their project. There was no building on the project so they initially decided to construct a car port. They then thought since it is Minnesota it would be best to have a garage. They started thinking of having a meeting room upstairs and a viewing area for the vehicles. They then started designing the building with the concept of a futuristic look. Since they are designing cars for the future, they thought they would like the display area as such. That is how they have gotten to where they are now. Chair Stoltz asked Mr. Waters if he agreed or disagreed with the staff report. Mr. Waters stated he disagreed with the staff recommendations in the report. Lechelt asked Mr. Waters if they are going for LEED Certification and would the building reach certification with the products they are using. Mr. Waters stated LEED Certification was not really being considered or intended. Lechelt asked if they could use glass for the garage door. Mr. Waters said the aluminum doors do have glass panels in them. Lechelt asked Franzen if that portion of glass would be EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 3 considered in the percentage. Franzen stated it would count towards the percentage. Wuttke asked the project proponent what the visual imparities would be for the residents. Mr. Waters stated the front of the building would be visible from 78th street and not the freeway. The back of the building is what the residents would see, which is just a monolithic plain wall. Pitzrick stated there are two main materials that are contributing to the material issue. They are EFIS products, which are on the back of the building, and alucabond, which is a metal product. He asked if they changed the EFIS on the back wall, would it bring them up to standards. Mr. Waters stated they would be willing to change to conform. Charles Howley stated if they changed it, it would bring them up to 55 percent. Pitzrick stated the solar panels on one side of the building are not really effective as they are more southeast than south. Mr. Waters stated they are working with an expert in the field and he thinks the placement for the solar panels is just fine. Pitzrick stated the name has been changed on the drawings to Customer Experience Center versus Eco Center Experience Center and asked if the project is changing names. Ms. Frodl stated it is still an Eco Center, even though the word customer is in the title. Chair Stoltz asked if they would run standard operation hours. Ms. Frodl stated they would be operating during standard hours. Wuttke commented permeable pavers are being used and he was glad to see that. Charles Howley said they would be used in the plaza sidewalk area and to the right of the entrance where they will be showcasing the vehicles. There are no plans right now to use them elsewhere. Lechelt asked if the project proponent has talked with the Three Rivers Park District. Charles Howley stated they have not reached out to them, but did receive a letter from them last week with a few suggestions they will take into consideration. Chair Stoltz opened the meeting up for public input. Philip Smith, of 10670 Kiawah Drive, said in looking at the location map, they are the condo association located south of the project site. He is concerned about run-off from the project and stated in looking at the map, it appears there will be a great deal of run-off coming off of the roof of the building and asked what the City would do about this. In regards to noise, even though vehicles are all electric, there still would be trucks delivering vehicles and making noise. He stated he is curious to see what the Three Rivers Park District has to say about the water run-off. Charles Howley addressed this issue by utilizing the overhead projector to show where the building was located and what the drainage plan would be and where the water run-off would ultimately be going. He pointed out EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 4 this would certainly meet all of the water shed requirements and stated the water quality should not be an issue with this project. Ms. Frodl addressed the vehicle delivery issue and stated it would happen during normal business hours and would not be that frequent. Doug Waterman, of 10698 Kiawah Drive stated that they will mainly be seeing the solar panels on the building and is concerned if they will reflect back on the residents. Mr. Waters stated they are black solar panels and will not reflect back on the residents. Lechelt stated there is no clear stone indicated around the drain tile and asked if there would be additional stone around this to help with clogging. Charles stated the geotextile was not around the pipe and it would be going around the bathtub, so to speak, and there should be no clogging. He stated the water will go through a screen and on the back side is a rip/wrap and then is goes to infiltration. Lechelt asked if there will be training to monitor the maintenance of this. Charles confirmed there would be some training on this. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen to comment on this project. Franzen stated using the alucabond is not an issue as a material in the 25% category and if the front of the building is where they will be showcasing that then they could increase the use of limestone on the other three sides and they would be conforming. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen if he thought this project should be continued to the next meeting. Franzen stated it would be up to the Commission to make that decision. Chair Stoltz asked the Commission Members their thoughts on this project. Fyten stated he is not really concerned with it and is for recommending approval. Pitzrick said he is also fine with it as long as they deal with the EFIS materials. Pitzrick also pointed out he was there today driving vehicles and they were very quiet. Schultz stated the change points are minor and he would be in favor of this project. Lechelt stated she feels the same way as long as the residents are okay with what was discussed tonight. Lee said he would was fine with the project. Wuttke stated he has no problem approving it,but wants them to work with City Staff. Mr. Waters commented that doing the one side of the building with limestone would not work because the sides have to be the same as the front of the building. He said it is easiest to do the back of the building. Lee stated he would be comfortable going with 55 percent. Wuttke stated just by doing Pitzrick's EFIS change, it would bring them down to 55 percent. MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Lee, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 5 MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Fyten, to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 42 acres, Planned unit Development District Review on 42 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 42 acres, Site Plan Review on 42 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 42 acres with the caveat they work with Staff on 55 percent, based on plans stamped dated June 30, 2011 and the staff report dated July 8, 2011. Motion carried 7-0. VIII. MEMBERS' REPORT IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Lee, seconded by Wuttke, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Public Hearings 08/16/11 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Development/Planning Thunderbird Aviation VIIL D. Janet Jeremiah, Scott A. Kipp Requested Action Move to: • Close the Public Hearing; and • Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres Synopsis This project is a new 7,678 sq. ft. full service aviation facility. The Metropolitan Airports Commission is also reviewing the plans. Background Information Parking will be "outside"the perimeter fence, with convenient access to the building. This will help continue to address security improvements relating to vehicles operating on airport property. The new facility will include sanitary sewer and water. The existing facility will continue to use the well and septic system until the new facility is completed. The 120-Day Review Period Expires on October 22, 2011. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project at the July 11, 2011 meeting. Attachments 1. Resolution-Site Plan Review 2. Staff Report 3. Location Map 4. Land Use Map 5. Zoning Map 6. Aerial photo 7. Planning Commission Minutes 8. Design Framework Manual CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THUNDERBIRD AVIATION BY NANCY GRAZZINI-OLSON WHEREAS,Nancy Grazzini-Olson, has applied for Site Plan approval of Thunderbird Aviation to construct a new aviation facility; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 11, 2011 meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its August 16, 2011 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Thunderbird Aviation, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 16, 2011. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of August, 2011. Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen Porta, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 8, 2011 SUBJECT: Thunderbird Aviation Expansion APPLICANT: Nancy Grazzini-Olson FEE OWNER: Metropolitan Airports Commission LOCATION: 14091 Pioneer Trail, (Flying Cloud Airport) 120 DAY REVIEW: October 18, 2011 REQUEST: 1. Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres Staff Report—Thunderbird Aviation Expansion July 8, 2011 Page 2 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the Flying Cloud Airport as Airport land use. The airport is zoned Public. The Metropolitan Airports Commission(MAC) is currently reviewing the plans for the new Thunderbird Aviation facility. SITE PLAN The plan shows removal of the existing Thunderbird office and the construction of a new 7,678 sq. ft. facility closer to Pioneer Trail. Base area and floor area ratios are not restricted in the Public zoning district. Front yard setback to building requires 50 feet. The plan shows 60 feet. MAC lease areas do not represent lot lines, therefore, side and rear yard setbacks do not apply. Parking for the facility will be "outside" the perimeter fence, with convenient access to the building. This will help continue to address security improvements relating to vehicles operating on airport property. A total of 32 parking spaces are shown meeting MAC's requirements. An additional 8 proof of parking spaces could be added on the west end, if necessary, to meet City code. UTILITIES/DRAINAGE Sanitary sewer and water lines have been extended to the Thunderbird site. The existing well will need to be properly abandoned. The facility will require a fire sprinkler system. As part of the airport expansion, MAC constructed storm water infiltration basins around the airport. ARCHITECTURE In September of 1996, the City Council adopted the Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual, recognizing that aircraft hangars and other facilities at the airport serve a unique function and set of design characteristics. This manual establishes parameters regarding, among other things, building materials for new development at the airport and helps to guide new construction in a cohesive aesthetic manner. The proposed facility is in conformance with the manual. The new facility will be constructed of 75% rock face veneer and glass, and 25% stucco. This meets the Design Framework. Rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed. All trash will be contained within the building. Staff Report—Thunderbird Aviation Expansion July 8, 2011 Page 3 LIGHTING All lighting will need to be downcast cutoff shoebox fixtures. SIGNS Signs are proposed for the building. However, as a condition of approval for this project, any signs to be installed on the Thunderbird Aviation site or buildings, whether ground mounted or attached to the buildings, shall be professionally manufactured, internally illuminated, and meet the Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual and City code. LANDSCAPING Landscaping is required. The MAC has implemented a significant amount of landscaping around the airport over the past two years and will continue this fall. These efforts will satisfy the requirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the following request: • Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres This is based on plans stamp dated June 22, 2011, the Staff Report dated July 8, 2011 and the following conditions: 1. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. B. Install erosion control on the property. 2. Prior to building permit issuance for the property, the proponent shall: A. Review the plans with the Fire Marshal. B. Properly abandon the well. C. Submit building materials and colors for review and approval. 3. All future signs for the site shall be internally illuminated, meet the Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual and City code. Area Location Map - Thunderbird Aviation Address: 14091 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, MN 55347 r 1 ,, Staring Lake • 4 Pioneer Trail 0 /it , _iti SITE immilligH 111111,111 oiol 1111114 ir m Flying Cloud Drive — Ill..llq Jfr,„„.. 41 i/i/- mow— *NI fl- II1 8 550 1,100 2,200 Feet \ 1 1 1 a I Grass Lake — Guide Plan Map Thunderbird Aviation 14091 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, MN iII j l.'r *EMm;1n/1 k W .:a..r .. Staring Lake 111 °Rwlll1 oA rm"----e.!Awp, is44, lF L)em,."" r 1 D:a. 111 illroA,„, 9111111 011 FOXili. c=mu� li 471n111r, / we op /Ali .......1 .y�I h�II)A •at sytk.,, Vratc 4S4 �//// 1 �p4 '�4 llllllllll .4Aleigilk- 1 A .4 r 4 IIIIII . dm .....li ..r.,... rAstitori alt*sw reillilyof Eden Pra ;•= Lan • Use G • - ��iv %; ;� Plan Map 2000-21 a Faaith Grass Lake illibM 4I, Legend N Streams n Rural Residential 0.10 Units/Acre Neighborhood Commercial Principal Arterial i Low Density Residential 0-2.5 Units/Acre Community Commercial 17.7 Low Density/Public/Open Space -Regional Commercial —A Minor Arterial —B Minor Art erial SI Medium Density residential 2.5-10 Units/Acre®Town Center DATE Approved 03-19-03 DATE Revised 12-06-06 O Medium Density Residential/Office Park/Open Space —Major Collect DATE Revised 01-07-05 DATE Revised 03-01-07 or DATE Revised 11-07-05 DATE Revised 06-01-07 E D E N DATE Revised 02-23-06 DATE Revised 10-01-07 High Density Residential 10-40 Units/Acre �Public/Quasi-Publicm Minor Collector DATE Revised 03-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-08 J Airport 1-1 Golf Course DATE Revised 06-23-06 DATE Revised 03-01-09 Office -Church/Cemetary PRAIRIE V ,I Office/Industrial Open Water /I o.z5 0.125 0 LIVE•WORK•DREAM r��Office/Public/Open Space Right-Of-Way E. ..,....,.....„....z.,�..o.,a.,�,..� ......®.aF_.a..�,�,,. , -Industrial Miles Zoning Map Thunderbird Aviation 14091 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie MN iiir SITE , 4j \ • /4) City a ' •' • rilliiit lin JRD _ —miuppg -h City of Eden Prairie Zoning :•:........„„,,..„ Rural -Regional Commercial Shoreland Management Classifications N R1-44 One Family-44,000 sf.min. TC-C I NE I Natural Environment Waters R1-22 One Family-22,000 sf min. n TC-R I RD I Recreational Development Waters ilar.. r• I,/.. 1.1 R1-13.5 One Family-13,500 sf min. al TC-MU I GD I General Development Waters(Creeks Only) R1-9.5 One Family-9,500 sf min. 1 Industrial Park-2 Acre Min, ® 100- Year Floodplain EDEN RM-6.5 Multi-Family-6.7 U.P.A.max. Industrial Park- 5 Acre Min. Up dated through approved Ordinances#26-2008 -RM-2.5 Multi-Family-17.4 U.P.A.max. General Industrial-5 Acre Min. Ordinance#33-2001(BFI Addition)approved,but not shown on this map edition PRAIRIE Office J Public Date:March 1,2009 Neighborhood Commercial I I Golf Course In case of discrepancy related to a zoning classitmaaon on this zoning map,the ordinance LIVE•WORK•DREAM and attached legal description on file at Eden Paine Ciry Center will prevail. E.Community Commercial Water -Highway Commercial Right of Way 0 0.2 0.4 -Regional Service Commercial Miles .wa,_o...m..��mo. _..m. ®..t..o.,.,, ..,_. lnot ,..,,mo, Aerial Map - Thunderbird Aviation Address: 14091 Pioneer Trail, Eden Prairie, MN 55347 !paph' ....,0*.t• . ':' -7*-74 ,i'jf ,... i Wit*****440 Staring Lake ; rif 0/gW42 ti Pioneer Trail ' 4 -f--44' 1,,,e/ ----„........„,,,,,,„,..4 s. ,, , , , .,.... — 4 4.,::: 1' { " '4 i7,4,,l'41---/ /i I / ti / r / r ' i 1 p ' ft 1 4 ' • . p ., 1 1 s f 1 SITE il�, f �i , 4 _F < 61 .- 'tee`, [r .`,, Flying Cloud Drive - 1:00,40. ., r - Aik, . ...; 1.... , , till/11111111 3T r i; x ' _�� 9 6 asrt uax `it! a m-r. 10 (:',4,� �`� eA f Ir raiF sarxr.A �j'i r-, rep c r c ..e^ , 'ems R s.. w A .. - y - of ic • ___ — N 111111141--- o..r 550 1,100 2 00 Feet ` I n I Grass Lake - < s r APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY,JULY 11,2011 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: Matt Fyten, John Kirk, Katie Lechelt, Jacob Lee, Jerry Pitzrick, Kevin Schultz, Jon Stoltz, Travis Wuttke STAFF MEMBERS: Michael Franzen, City Planner Rod Rue, City Engineer Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Julie Krull, Recording Secretary I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE—ROLL CALL Chair Stoltz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Kirk was absent. II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Stoltz stated Franzen had an addition to the Planners Report, the Bear Path Trail Resolution. MOTION by Lechelt, seconded by Wuttke, to approve the amended agenda. Motion carried 7-0. III. MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 11, 2011 MOTION by Schultz, seconded by Lechelt, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. Pitzrick and Wuttke abstained. IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS V. PUBLIC MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. THUNDERBIRD AVIATION by Nancy Grazzini-Olson. Location: 14091 Pioneer Trail. EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 2 Request for: • Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres Nancy Grazzini-Olson, owner of Thunderbird Aviation, presented the proposal to build a new facility at the airport. She stated the facility would be closer to Pioneer Trail and parking for the building would be on the outside of the perimeter fence, which would help with security. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen to review the staff report. Franzen stated staff recommendation is for approval based on page 3 of the staff report. Lee asked the project proponent if they are next to Elliott. Ms. Grazzini-Olson stated they are next to Elliott. Lee stated when driving down the road it looks very choppy, and asked if they could put the parking facility inside so all the buildings would mess together better. Ms. Grazzini-Olson stated with the new security issues, the parking lot has to be on the outside of the perimeter fence. Franzen said it is all about curb appeal. He pointed out any of the new buildings will have more block or brick on them and in regards to the landscaping, you have to limit the amount of trees that can be put up because they attract birds. Chair Stoltz commented that previously a lot of the hangers did not have sewer and water and asked if that has changed. Rue stated they are developing sewer and water in these areas now. Wuttke asked what document was drafted in 1996. Franzen stated it was the Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual. It recognized that aircraft hangers and other facilities at the airport service a unique function and set of design characteristics. The manual establishes parameters regarding building materials for new development at the airport and helps to guide new construction in a cohesive and aesthetic manner. This project is in conformance with the manual. Chair Stoltz opened the meeting up for public input. There was no input. MOTION by Pitzrick, seconded by Lee, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION by Pitzrick, seconded by Fyten, to recommend approval of Site Plan Review on 4.7 acres based on plans stamped dated June 22, 2011 and the staff report dated July 8, 2011. Motion carried 6-0. VII. PLANNERS' REPORT VIII. MEMBERS' REPORT IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2011 Page 3 X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Lee, seconded by Wuttke, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 6-0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT DESIGN FRAMEWORK MANUAL July 1996 I. INTRODUCTION Flying Cloud Airport is located in south central Eden Prairie, consisting of approximately 560 acres of land. It is one of six reliever airports owned and operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission(MAC) within a 35 mile radius of the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. It is classified as a General Utility Airport by the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), and can accommodate all single engine aircraft, most twin engine, and light jet aircraft. Flying Cloud Airport offers a number of services to the public, including aircraft sales, aircraft rental, charter service, aircraft maintenance, and flight training. It also contains a World War II aircraft museum, an aircraft maintenance school, and an air traffic controller school. II. PURPOSE OF AIRPORT DESIGN FRAMEWORK The purpose of the Airport Design Framework Manual is to guide the development of future construction at Flying Cloud Airport. The Framework Manual includes guidelines for architectural standards, airport sign, site lighting, and trash handling. The goal of the guidelines is to encourage the sturdy construction and cohesive image of the facilities at Flying Cloud Airport. The design objectives of the guidelines are as follows: 1. Improve the quality of construction of the facilities. 2. Develop exterior aesthetic relationships between buildings through building materials and exterior colors. 3. Ensure that new signs are in conformance with the Eden Prairie Sign Code. 4. Contain site lighting to the airport facility and eliminate glare to neighboring buildings. 5. Increase landscaping areas to soften visual impacts of airport facilities, and increase visual interest. 6. Provide for adequate trash containment. Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 III. EXISTING INVENTORY A. Quality of Buildings and Hangars There are currently over 110 separate aircraft storage buildings at Flying Cloud Airport. The majority of these buildings were constructed over thirty years ago and are in various levels of deterioration, including: corrosion, chipped and faded paint, bent metal, cracked concrete block. Color schemes for these buildings vary from hangar to hangar, and include some colors that do not support any particular theme. Many of these older buildings may not meet current building codes as well. Some newly constructed facilities and the upgrading of others have established a level of building improvement, which should continue and be encouraged. These improvements involve the use of decorative concrete block and glass in construction, as well as warranted metal panels in earth tone colors. While there is a beginning of consistency in the types of building materials and color schemes used around the airport, there is still considerable variation in the physical appearance and age of the majority of these structures. B. Signs Existing business signs at the airport have no cohesive theme regarding materials or style. Signs range from painted sheets of plywood to internally lit pylons. Some signs are portable; some are attached to fences, while others are ground mounted. C. Landscaping Landscaping around the airport is sparse. Some improvements have been made in recent years, including the evergreen and crabapple trees installed by MAC along the northwest hangar row to help soften the view to the existing worn hangar facades. Ornamental trees and shrubs have been planted at the northeast corner of the airport as a"gateway" improvement. In addition, new evergreen and flowering shrubs have been installed as part of the recently completed Executive Aviation facility. While it is important to maintain obstruction clearance for all aircraft operations, the use of approved landscaping has helped to improve visual interest around the airport. D. Trash Handling Overall, the airport does not appear to have a trash handling problem. Many of the Existing hangar facilities do not generate any significant amount of trash to require a means for containment. Other facilities store trash within the structure, or provide an exterior trash dumpster for this purpose. 2 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 IV. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Purpose: To improve the quality of the construction of the facilities and to create aesthetic exterior relationships between buildings. New construction shall be reviewed based on the following standards: 1. All exterior building finishes shall consist of no less than 75% of the following materials: a) face brick,b)natural stone, c) decorative precast concrete, d) metal panel, e) glass, f) decorative concrete block. 2. For commercially classified buildings according to MAC, the exterior building elevation which most closely faces a public roadway shall contain no less than 25% of the following materials: a) face brick, b) natural stone, c)precast decorative concrete, d) decorative concrete block. 3. All metal panel shall consist of a minimum 20 year warranted, pre-colored, baked on finish in earth tone shades such as brown, beige, tan, grey, light blue, or dark blue. 4. All ground mounted, or roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be physically screened from all public roadways and adjacent differing land use. 5. All construction shall be in conformance with the Eden Prairie Building Code. V. SIGNS Purpose: To apply the standards and regulations from the Eden Prairie Sign Code to airport signs for commercial buildings. Future construction of commercial signs should incorporate relationships of size, type, and placement. 1. Entrance signs should be ground mounted and feature a directory of businesses and hangars in the area. These signs should use the same letter style, color, and material. 2. Commercial building signs whether wall mounted, or pylon mounted should be professionally manufactured and be internally lit. Pylon signs shall be no taller than 25 feet. 3. Signs shall be in compliance with the Eden Prairie Sign Code. 3 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 4. Signs attached to the airport perimeter fence (other than Metropolitan Airports Commission informational signs)will not be approved. VI. LANDSCAPING Purpose: To provide for adequate lighting for airport functions while preventing off-site glare impacts. Green areas can be improved by adding small ornamental trees and shrubs. Plantings around buildings can create visual interest and soften views to parking areas. Perimeter plantings of evergreen trees will add visual interest, and help with noise mitigation to adjacent residential or park uses. 1. As part of new construction, or a building upgrade, and where space permits, landscaping will be incorporated into the site to help soften views of parking areas. VII. SITE LIGHTING Purpose: To provide for adequate lighting for airport functions while preventing off-site glare impacts. Downcast lighting can be used to adequately light the area without spreading glare of site. It is desired that the lighting poles be of the same height and lighting intensity. Lights mounted on hangars or commercial buildings should be consistent in height, especially when hangars are in a row format. 1. All site lighting shall be of a downcast or shielded variety to restrict off site glare. 2. Pole lighting shall not exceed 25 feet in height. 3. The type of lighting should be consistent throughout the airport property, i.e., high pressure sodium, mercury vapor, etc. VIII. TRASH HANDLING Purpose: To provide for a clean airport, and to maintain an aesthetically pleasing environment. Every possible attempt should be made to accommodate trash handling in the interior of the buildings. Trash storage areas should be accessible from both an interior and exterior 4 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 door to facilitate proper maintenance. If it is not possible to handle trash within the building, a trash storage structure shall be constructed of building materials compatible with the architectural treatment of the principle structure. IX. PLANS REQUIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION Site Plans shall include: 1. Existing and proposed structures affected by the proposed construction. 2. Existing and proposed parking areas for vehicles and aircraft. 3. Existing and proposed green areas, including aircraft tie-down areas. 4. Location of existing or proposed sewer and water systems. 5. Proposed signage, lighting, and landscaping details 6. Location of proposed trash enclosure, if trash is to be stored outside. Architectural Plans shall include: 1. Elevations of all sides of the building. 2. Floor plan including dimensions of all structures. 3. Type and color of exterior building materials. 4. Location of all eating, air conditioning, and ventilation systems, and the method for physical screening if visible from a public roadway. 5. Trash enclosure details, if the trash is to be stored outside. 6. Any other plan necessary for the Building Department to review the proposal for permit issuance. 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Public Hearing August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Jay Lotthammer, Director, Parks and Recreation Proposed Fees for 2012 VIII. E. Parks and Recreation Requested Action Motion to: Approve the proposed Park and Recreation fees and charges for inclusion in the 2012 budget. Synopsis Staff is submitting the proposed changes to fees and charges for inclusion in the 2012 budget. On June 6, 2011 this item was reviewed and discussed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and was unanimously recommended for City Council approval. A notice of the public hearing appeared in the August 11, 2011 edition of the Eden Prairie News. These fees and charges are a part of the annual operating budget within the Parks and Recreation Department and help offset operating expenses. Proposed changes from 2011 to 2012 include the following: Park Building/Pavilion and Room Rentals • Increases were made to room rentals and park building/pavilion rentals fees. • Meeting room rental rates were adjusted to reflect room size and layout. • Equipment rental fee option was added for the Senior Center room rentals. Programs • A non-prime time fee was created for Racquetball court rental. • A non-prime time fee was created for Play Structure use. • An administrative fee was created for non-paid overdue tree/weed ordinance violations. • Grave Markers setting and Internment fees increased based on direct contractor charges. • Community Center membership rates increased by 3%. Background Fees and charges are established for programs and services offered through the Parks and Recreation Department. Historically, the fees and charges have been approved by the City Parks and Recreation Proposed Fees for 2012 August 16, 2011 Page 2 Council towards the end of the calendar year. From a practical standpoint, this meets the requirements for submission into the next year's budget. However, in order to promote the programs and services that these fees and charges are associated with in a timely manner, staff has had to assume that these fees would be acceptable to the City Council. In order to advance the timeline for approval and allow for additional comments and suggestions, staff has adopted the following timeline: June Review proposed fees and charges with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August Submit to City Council for Approval Late Fall Include with Resolution for all City Fees and Charges January Implement Approved Fees Attachments Proposed 2012 Fee Resolution Charts F m Fsd dial 2112 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 COMMUNITY CENTER Community Center Membership Benefits 1.Includes full use of fitness facility including a complimentary equipment orientation 2.Includes group fitness classes(except specialty fitness classes such as Yoga and Pilates) 3.Includes use of racquetball courts 4.Includes free open gym,skate and swim Additional Information 1.One time administrative fee of$29.00 2.Month to month automatic debit payment required unless a payment for 12 months is rendered in full at time of purchase. Occurs on the 1st-3rd of every month. 3.10%discount for 12 month up front payment. 4.$5.00 monthly suspension fee available for up to 3 months per 12 month term. 5.$10.00 change fee for upgrades and downgrades Guidelines for Membership Types Youth Membership Defined as any child 18 years of age and younger. Adult Membership Defined as any individual ages 19 years of age and older. Dual Membership Any two adults or adult and youth residing at the same address. Dual Plus One Any two adults plus one youth or one adult and two youths residing at the same address. Household Membership Any two adults and up to four youth residing at the same Senior Defined as any individual 62 years of age and older. Extended Household See Community Center Management for membership options that include nannies,and babysitters. Senior Dual Membership Any one senior and one additional member(55 or older)residing at the same address. College Membership An adult attending school and possesses a current college ID Fim Fsd dial 2)12 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 Monthly Resident Membership Rates A resident either lives or works in Eden Prairie.Valid for 12 months from date of purchase. 10%discount on upfront purchase of 12 month membership Youth(18 and under) $ 27.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 26.00 $ 27.00 3.8% Adult(19 and over) $ 35.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 34.00 $ 35.00 2.9% Dual $ 62.50 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 60.50 $ 62.50 3.3% Dual Plus One $ 73.50 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 71.50 $ 73.50 2.8% Household $ 84.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 82.00 $ 84.00 2.4% Senior(62 and older) $ 27.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 26.00 $ 27.00 3.8% Senior Dual $ 46.75 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 45.50 $ 46.75 2.7% Monthly Non Resident Membership Rates Youth(18 and under) $ 42.25 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 41.00 $ 42.25 3.0% Adult(19 and over) $ 42.25 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 41.00 $ 42.25 3.0% Dual $ 75.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 73.00 $ 75.00 2.7% Dual Plus One $ 88.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 85.50 $ 88.00 2.9% Household $ 101.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 98.00 $ 101.00 3.1% Senior(62 and older) $ 42.25 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 41.00 $ 42.25 3.0% Senior Dual $ 75.00 Monthly rate plus applicable taxes $ 73.00 $ 75.00 2.7% College Student Short-term Memberhip Rates *Students must show college ID *Administrative Fee is waived. *Applicable taxes apply. One Month(Winter Break) $ 49.00 30 consecutive days between Nov 15-Jan 30 $ 49.00 100.0% Three Months(Summer) $ 99.00 3 consecutive months between April 15-Sept 15 $ 99.00 100.0% Four Months(Summer) $ 129.00 4 consecutive months between April 15-Sept 15 $ 129.00 100.0% Non-College Student Short-term Membership Rate One Month $ 75.00 Administrative Fee is waived. $ 75.00 100.0% Membership Administrative Fee $ 29.00 Fee to administer a new membership $ 29.00 $ 29.00 0.0% Membership Change Fee $ 10.00 Fee to make changes to an account $ 10.00 $ 10.00 0.0% Fte Fsd d i ai 2712 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 Equipment Rental ** Skates Free to Eden Prairie non profit service organization groups. Ice Skates $ 2.50 Per pair $ 2.00 $ 2.50 20.0% Dry Floor Gym rental includes:10 tables,40 chairs and 4 stanchions and two white boards Additional Chairs $ 2.00 $ 2.00 Additional Stanchion $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Additional Table $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Play Care Play Care-Parent is a Member $ 2.50 Two hours;Two hour maximum $ 2.50 $ 2.50 0.0% Play Care-Parent is a Nonmember $ 3.50 Two hours;Two hour maximum $ 3.50 $ 3.50 0.0% Punch Card-Parent is a Member $ 40.00 Punch Card-20 sessions $ 40.00 $ 40.00 0.0% Punch Card-Parent is a Non member $ 60.00 Punch Card-20 sessions $ 60.00 $ 60.00 0.0% Play Structure Under 12 months $ - Per child,per visit free free 0.0% 12 months-4 years of age $ 4.00 Per child,per visit $ 3.50 $ 4.00 14.3% 5 years to 15 years $ 5.00 Per child,per visit $ 4.50 $ 5.00 11.1% Play Structure-Non-prime Time Half price Monday-Friday after 1 p.m.and Saturday-Sunday after 4 p.m. Under 12 months $ - Per child,per visit free 12 months-4 years of age $ 2.00 Per child,per visit $ 2.00 5 years to 15 years $ 2.50 Per child,per visit $ 2.50 Tot Time/Open Gym Members $ - Child must be on a family membership free free 0.0% Non Members $ 6.00 $ 5.50 $ 6.00 9.1% Fise Fsd dial 2312 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 Daily Full Use Pass(includes open gym,open skate,open swim,group fitness,fitness,and racquetball) **Must be age 14 and up to use Fitness Center Members $ - free free 0.0% Individual Resident $ 9.00 Youth or adult $ 8.00 $ 9.00 12.5% Family Resident $ - Up to five people living at the same address $ 16.00 n/a 0.0% Individual Non Resident $ 12.00 Youth or adult $ 10.00 $ 12.00 20.0% Family Non Resident $ - Up to five people living at the same address $ 20.00 n/a 0.0% Open Skate,Swim and Gym **Resident and Non Resident-fee is for the use of open swim,open skate,and open gym Babies $ - up to 12 months free 0.0% Tots $ 4.00 12mths to 4 years (added for 2010/2011) $ 3.50 $ 4.00 14.3% Youth $ 5.00 5 years of age to 18 years of age $ 4.50 $ 5.00 11.1% Adult $ 5.50 19 years of age or older $ 5.00 $ 5.50 10.0% Family rate $ 16.50 Max 5 people living at same address $ 15.00 $ 16.50 10.0% Special Ice Rates-School District 272 Physical education classes $ 77.50 Per hour-50%of non-prime time rate $ 75.00 $ 77.50 3.3% Hockey games Prime time rate-Personnel required to run the games supplied by others. Special Pool Rates-School District 272 Physical education classes Based on prime time rate for 5,490 total square feet Lifeguard training class with EP School Phy Ed De $ - Per student($1,000 minimum)when course is conducted by $ 95.00 n/a 0.0% City staff Fee FLSd d i rn 2312 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 COMMUNITY CENTER-POLICY OF GROUP RATE&LIABILITIES Group Rentals ** Groups of 20 or greater will receive free rental skates when purchasing ice,room or birthday party package Lock-In-11 p.m.to 5:30 a.m. ** Lock-in groups will be charged an additional$1 per person for groups greater than 150. Personal costs above stated rates include one building supervisor. ** Supervision will be at the discretion of the Community Center management. This will be based on the number of people to be using the center,as well as the age and type of group. Skate Rental $ 2.50 $ 2.00 $ 2.50 25.0% Lifeguards $ 16.00 Per hour $ 16.00 $ 16.00 0.0% ** 1 to 50 participants-2 lifeguards required ** 51 to 100 participants-3 lifeguards required ** 100 plus participants-4 lifeguards required. Additional lifeguards determined by management depending on group size and ages. Pool rental $ 54.50 Per hour.Two hour minimum plus$16.00/hr per lifeguard $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% COMMUNITY CENTER ADVERTISING FEES Note:Once groups have paid for the initial multi-year agreement,they may renew the contract each year for 1 year at the pro-rated fee. Ice resurfacer $ 1,500.00 Per side per year/5 year term($2,500 for both sides) $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.0% Score board $ 1,500.00 Per side per year/5 year term $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.0% On-Ice logo $ 1,500.00 Per two 4'x4'logos per year/3 year term $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.0% Dasher board $ 950.00 Annually/3 year term $ 950.00 $ 950.00 0.0% OAK POINT POOL Pool Rental-Lifeguards ** Pool rental in addition to these fees Small slide pool rental only $ 48.00 Per hour for three lifeguards $ 47.00 $ 48.00 2.1% Requires a minimum of three lifeguards on group size and age Large pool rental only $ 32.00 Per hour for two lifeguards $ 32.00 $ 32.00 0.0% Requires a minimum of 2 lifeguards Based on non-holiday hours Rental of entire pool facility $ 80.00 Per hour for five lifeguards $ 79.00 $ 80.00 1.3% Requires a minimum of 5 lifeguards Fise Fsd dial 2112 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 OUTDOOR CENTER Rental Canoe rack spot storage $ 45.00 Per rack spot,per season $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% ORGANIZED ATHLETICS Adult League Play Non youth sport teams $ 40.00 Per game $ 40.00 $ 40.00 0.0% Ball Field Tournaments State,regional,and national tournaments $ 100.00 Per day,per field $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% Other youth and adult tournaments $ 100.00 Per day,per field $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% Additional charge when lights are used $ 15.00 Per hour $ 15.00 $ 15.00 0.0% New soccer field for tournament $ 170.00 Per field set-up $ 170.00 $ 170.00 0.0% Clinics and Camps $ 50.00 Per day,per field $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% ART CENTER Art Center Membership Benefits 1.10%off classes 2.Invitation to special events 3.10%off select supplies 4.10%off birthday parties(Art Center birthday parties only) 5.Special studio access outside of class times 6.Subscription to City News email newsletter 7.$5.00 off Walker Art Center membership 8.$5.00 off the one-time administrative fee at the Eden Prairie Community Center for new members Membership Rates A household includes two adults and up to 4 children. Additional family members can be added to the household membership for$5.00 a person Individual $ 30.00 Annual rate plus applicable taxes $ 30.00 $ 30.00 0.0% Household $ 45.00 Annual rate plus applicable taxes $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% Fise Ftsd Li i rn 2J12 %Change Service 2011 Fee Description 2011 2012 11 to 12 PLEASANT HILL CEMETERY Ground Thawing:November 1-April I Casket burial $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 0.0% Cremation burial $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% Internment Burial fees are direct cost from contractor.These could adjust mid-year due to contractor price increase. Casket Burial $ 550.00 $ 550.00 100.0% Cremation Burial $ 350.00 $ 350.00 100.0% Casket burials discontinue Vault size up to 36 inches long $ 300.00 discontinue Vault size up to 60 inches long $ 400.00 discontinue Vault size up to 96 inches long $ 500.00 Cremation burials discontinue Urn size 12 inches and under $ 300.00 discontinue Urn size over 12 inches $ 300.00 Lot Resident $ 400.00 20%perpetual care&80%maintenance $ 400.00 $ 400.00 0.0% Non-resident $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 0.0% Set Grave Markers Single $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 25.0% Double $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 20.0% COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS 20 foot by 30 foot plot Residents only $ 54.00 Senior citizen discount$12.00 $ 54.00 $ 54.00 0.0% 20 foot by 60 foot plot Residents only $ 108.00 Senior citizen discount$24.00 $ 108.00 $ 108.00 0.0% FORESTRY Administrative fee-tree/weed ordinance violations Flat charge is added to the current balance due to obtain the total certified amount $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 Group 2 Group 2 Group 2 Group 3 Group 3 Group 3 Facility Facility Information 2011 Fee 2011-1 2012-1 %Change 2011-2 2012-2 %Change 2011-3 2012-3 %Change Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 11 to 12 11 to 12 11 to 12 COMMUNITY CENTER ** Request must be submitted to the Department Coordinator or Customer Service Representative a minimum of two weeks prior to requested date.Times and dates must not conflict with an existing program or activity. City programs have priority. ** Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting room use per month. Ice Arena-Rinks 1,2&3 Spring prime time-March 1 thru June 13-3 p.m.to 11 p.m. $ 180.00 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% Monday-Friday,weekends,holiday,&non-school days; Spring non-prime time-March 1 thru June 13-before 3 p.m.i. $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $ 155.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% Monday-Friday; Summer time-June 14 thru Aug 31-6 a.m.to 11 p.m. $ 180.00 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% Fall prime time-September 1 thru September 30 -3 p.m.to 11 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% $ 180.00 $ 180.00 0.0% Monday-Friday,weekends,holiday,&non-school days; Fall non-prime time-September 1 thru September 30-before $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $ 155.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% Monday-Friday; Winter prime time-October 1 thru February 29-3 p.m.to 11 $ 195.00 $ 195.00 $ 195.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 190.00 $ 195.00 2.6% $ 190.00 $ 195.00 2.6% $ 190.00 $ 195.00 2.6% Monday-Friday,weekends,holiday,&non-school days; Winter non-prime time-October 1 thru February 29-before? $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $ 155.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% $ 155.00 $ 155.00 0.0% Monday-Friday; MEETING ROOMS All meeting rooms include AV and white boards,wi fi and customized room set up included. 2 hr minimum on all room rentals Cambria Room $ 50.00 $ 55.00 $ 65.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 45.00 $ 50.00 11.1% $ 50.00 $ 55.00 10.0% $ 65.00 $ 65.00 0.0% Dry floor-3rd rink cement floor $ 50.00 $ 60.00 $ 75.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 40.00 $ 50.00 25.0% $ 50.00 $ 60.00 20.0% $ 65.00 $ 75.00 15.4% Gymnasium(1 court) $ 30.00 $ 40.00 $ 55.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 25.00 $ 30.00 20.0% $ 35.00 $ 40.00 14.3% $ 50.00 $ 55.00 10.0% Gymnasium(Full gym) $ 50.00 $ 60.00 $ 75.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 40.00 $ 50.00 25.0% $ 50.00 $ 60.00 20.0% $ 65.00 $ 75.00 15.4% Lounge Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ 30.00 $ 40.00 $ 55.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 25.00 $ 30.00 20.0% $ 30.00 $ 40.00 33.3% $ 45.00 $ 55.00 22.2% Meeting Room 101 Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 40.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 15.00 $ 20.00 33.3% $ 20.00 $ 25.00 25.0% $ 35.00 $ 40.00 14.3% Meeting Room 201 Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ 30.00 $ 40.00 $ 55.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 30.00 $ 30.00 0.0% $ 35.00 $ 40.00 14.3% $ 50.00 $ 55.00 10.0% Meeting Room 103 and 203 Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ 10.00 $ 15.00 $ 30.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 15.00 $ 10.00 -33.3% $ 20.00 $ 15.00 -25.0% $ 35.00 $ 30.00 -14.3% Meeting Rooms 202 and combined Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $ 45.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 20.00 $ 25.00 25.0% $ 25.00 $ 30.00 20.0% $ 40.00 $ 45.00 12.5% Meeting Room 203/204 Combined Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ - $ - $ - Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 25.00 n/a -100.0% $ 30.00 n/a -100.0% $ 45.00 n/a -100.0% Meeting Room 204 Eden Prairie Athletic Associations receive one free meeting roo $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 40.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 40.00 Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 Group 2 Group 2 Group 2 Group 3 Group 3 Group 3 Facility Facility Information 2011 Fee 2011-1 2012-1 %Change 2011-2 2012-2 %Change 2011-3 2012-3 %Change Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 11 to 12 11 to 12 11 to 12 Parking Permits 2009/2010-2010/2011 full year rate-Community Center $ 350.00 $ 350.00 $ 350.00 $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.0% $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.0% $ 350.00 $ 350.00 0.0% 2009/2010-2010/2011 full year rate-Round Lake $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 0.0% $ 200.00 $ 200.00 0.0% $ 200.00 $ 200.00 0.0% Pro Rate beginning December 1-Community Center $ 175.00 $ 175.00 $ 175.00 $ 175.00 $ 175.00 0.0% $ 175.00 $ 175.00 0.0% $ 175.00 $ 175.00 0.0% Pro Rate beginning December 1-Round Lake $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% Pro Rate beginning March 1-Community Center $ 87.50 $ 87.50 $ 87.50 $ 87.50 $ 87.50 0.0% $ 87.50 $ 87.50 0.0% $ 87.50 $ 87.50 0.0% Pro Rate beginning March 1-Round Lake $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% Racquetball Free with membership(per person) $ 8.50 $ 8.50 $ 8.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 8.00 $ 8.50 6.3% $ 8.00 $ 8.50 6.3% $ 8.00 $ 8.50 6.3% Racquetball-Non-prime time 8:00am-11:00am-2:00pm-4:00-pm-Monday-Friday $ 5.50 $ 5.50 $ 5.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 5.50 $ 5.50 $ 5.50 After 2:00pm on Saturday All day Sunday Studio A Available for rental with the use of Eden Prairie fitness staff onl $ 41.50 $ 41.50 $ 41.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 40.00 $ 41.50 3.8% $ 40.00 $ 41.50 3.8% $ 40.00 $ 41.50 3.8% Studio B Available for rental with the use of Eden Prairie fitness staff onl $ 31.50 $ 31.50 $ 31.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 30.00 $ 31.50 5.0% $ 30.00 $ 31.50 5.0% $ 30.00 $ 31.50 5.0% Fitness Instructors $ 33.00 $ 33.00 $ 33.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 32.00 $ 33.00 3.1% $ 32.00 $ 33.00 3.1% $ 32.00 $ 33.00 3.1% Swimming Pool(capacity 268) Prime time-6 a.m.to 5 p.m.Monday thru Saturday/noon to` $ 65.00 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 63.00 $ 65.00 3.2% $ 63.00 $ 65.00 3.2% $ 63.00 $ 65.00 3.2% Non-prime time-5 p.m.to 9 p.m.Monday thru Sunday $ 54.50 $ 54.50 $ 54.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% Discounted rate-9 p.m.to 11 p.m.Monday thru Sunday plus c $ 49.50 $ 49.50 $ 49.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 48.00 $ 49.50 3.1% $ 48.00 $ 49.50 3.1% $ 48.00 $ 49.50 3.1% Wallyball Fees changed to$25.00 per court for 90 minutes of play. EPCC $ 28.00 $ 28.00 $ 28.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 25.00 $ 28.00 12.0% $ 25.00 $ 28.00 12.0% $ 25.00 $ 28.00 12.0% No hourly use. Group rental clean up fee(for groups with food) Rooms 101 and 203 and viewing areas $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00 per rental $ 10.00 $ 10.00 0.0% $ 10.00 $ 10.00 0.0% $ 10.00 $ 10.00 0.0% Rooms 202 and 204 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 per rental $ 15.00 $ 15.00 0.0% $ 15.00 $ 15.00 0.0% $ 15.00 $ 15.00 0.0% Rooms 201,Small group Cambria and Lounge $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 per rental $ 25.00 $ 25.00 0.0% $ 25.00 $ 25.00 0.0% $ 25.00 $ 25.00 0.0% Large Group Cambria,Gymnasium and Rink 3 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 per rental $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% Preferred catering vendor fees Resident $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Annual $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% $ 50.00 $ 50.00 0.0% Non-Resident $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 Annual $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% $ 100.00 $ 100.00 0.0% SENIOR CENTER RENTAL Senior Center Community Room/I Including kitchen-NO LOUNGE $ 40.00 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 40.00 $ 40.00 0.0% $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% Senior Center Kitchen Approx.15 people with use of appliances $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% Senior Center Community Room/KAII three rooms $ 60.00 $ 60.00 $ 60.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 60.00 100.0% $ 60.00 100.0% $ 60.00 100.0% Senior Center Lounge Lounge only $ 15.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 15.00 100.0% $ 15.00 100.0% $ 15.00 100.0% Senior Center Room 200 Approx.10-15 people $ 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 15.00 $ 15.00 0.0% $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% Senior Center Room 201 Approx.40 people theater style,25 to 30 table seating $ 30.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 25.00 $30.00 20.0% $ 30.00 $ 35.00 16.7% $ 30.00 $ 35.00 16.7% Senior Center Room 203 Approx.25 people theater style,15 to 20 table seating $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% $ 25.00 $ 25.00 0.0% $ 25.00 $ 25.00 0.0% Senior Center Room 209 Approx.10 to 15 $ 15.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 15.00 $ 15.00 0.0% $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% $ 20.00 $ 20.00 0.0% Equipment Rental $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 Group 2 Group 2 Group 2 Group 3 Group 3 Group 3 Facility Facility Information 2011 Fee 2011-1 2012-1 %Change 2011-2 2012-2 %Change 2011-3 2012-3 %Change Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 11 to 12 11 to 12 11 to 12 OAK POINT POOL ** Lifeguards must be added as follows at the rate of$16.00 an hour; small slide pool rental only-minimum 3 lifeguards, large pool rental only-minimum of 2 lifeguards,rental of entire pool facility-minimum of 5 lifeguards ** Additional lifeguards will be determined by management depending on group size and age. ** Sunday rentals require an additional$31.50 an hour maintenance fee for the rental of 6 lanes of the pool. For Sunday rental of the entire pool,an additional$55.00 an hour is required. Oak Point Pool Rental Prime time:6 a.m.-5 p.m.,Monday-Saturday;and noon-5 p.r $ 65.00 $ 65.00 $ 65.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 63.00 $ 65.00 3.2% $ 63.00 $ 65.00 3.2% $ 63.00 $ 65.00 3.2% Non-prime time:5 p.m.-9 p.m.,Monday-Sunday $ 54.50 $ 54.50 $ 54.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% $ 53.00 $ 54.50 2.8% Discount rate:9 p.m.-11 p.m.,Monday-Sunday $ 49.50 $ 49.50 $ 49.50 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 48.00 $ 49.50 3.1% $ 48.00 $ 49.50 3.1% $ 48.00 $ 49.50 3.1% PARK FACILITIES RENTAL **All groups of over 100 will be charged full day rate ** Eden Prairie School District Programs charged only direct cost for all parks during the school day. **beginning in 2010,price does not include tax. ** No private group of over 300 will be allowed to reserve facilities at any park.(Maximum number at Staring Lake Park will be 150.) ** All parks REQUIRE a$200 deposit Crestwood Park Building Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% Homeward Hills Barn 1/2 Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 125.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 110.00 $ 125.00 13.6% $ 110.00 $ 125.00 13.6% $ 110.00 $ 125.00 13.6% Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 165.00 $ 165.00 $ 165.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 150.00 $ 165.00 10.0% $ 150.00 $ 165.00 10.0% $ 150.00 $ 165.00 10.0% Miller Park Building Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% Edenvale Park Building Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% 0.0% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% Forest Hills Park Building Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% 0.0% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% Nesbitt Park Building Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% $ 85.00 $ 90.00 5.9% Purgatory Creek Recreation Area P:1/2 Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 140.00 $ 140.00 $ 140.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 135.00 $ 140.00 3.7% $ 135.00 $ 140.00 3.7% $ 135.00 $ 140.00 3.7% Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 195.00 $200.00 2.6% $ 195.00 $ 200.00 2.6% $ 195.00 $ 200.00 2.6% Riley Lake Park Pavilion 1/2 Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 140.00 $ 140.00 $ 140.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 135.00 $ 140.00 3.7% $ 135.00 $ 140.00 3.7% $ 135.00 $ 140.00 3.7% Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 195.00 $200.00 2.6% $ 195.00 $ 200.00 2.6% $ 195.00 $ 200.00 2.6% Riley-Jacques Barn Per hour-2 hour minimum $ 45.00 $ 45.00 $ 45.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% $ 45.00 $ 45.00 0.0% Round Lake Park Building 1/2 Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 115.00 $ 115.00 $ 115.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $ 155.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 150.00 $155.00 3.3% $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% Round Lake Pavilion 1/2 Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 115.00 $ 115.00 $ 115.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $ 155.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 150.00 $155.00 3.3% $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% Staring Lake Park Amphitheatre Per hour-2 hour minimum $ 55.00 $ 55.00 $ 55.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 55.00 $ 55.00 0.0% $ 55.00 $ 55.00 0.0% $ 55.00 $ 55.00 0.0% Audio Technician Sound Tech&Sound Equipment-2 hour minimum $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 35.00 $ 35.00 0.0% $ 35.00 $ 35.00 0.0% $ 35.00 $ 35.00 0.0% Staring Lake Park Building 1/2 Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 115.00 $ 115.00 $ 115.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% $ 110.00 $ 115.00 4.5% Full Day-Maximum capacity varies $ 155.00 $ 155.00 $ 155.00 Plus applicable taxes $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% $ 150.00 $ 155.00 3.3% Warming Houses-2 hour minimur Per hour-Supervision required-2 hour minimum $ 10.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 Per hour plus applicable taxes $ 10.00 $ 10.00 0.0% $ 30.00 $ 30.00 0.0% $ 30.00 $ 30.00 0.0% December 15-March 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Payment of Claims August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Sue Kotchevar, Office of the Payment of Claims City Manager/Finance Requested Action Move to: Approve the Payment of Claims as submitted (roll call vote) Synopsis Checks 210363 — 211365 Wire Transfers 4243 —4263 4248 July 20th US Bank Purchasing Card Payment Attachments City of Eden Prairie Council Check Register 8/16/2011 Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210942 1,125,225 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance Bituminous Overlay 210462 534,866 GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES INC TIF Payment Project Fund TIF Payment 4243 337,773 WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NA Bank Reserve 2007A Facility Lease-3rd Rink Bond Payment 211062 303,362 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME MCES User Fee Sewer Utility-General MCES Monthly Fee 210777 276,751 HEALTHPARTNERS Medical/Dental Premiums Health and Benefits Medical/Dental Premiums 210604 225,534 SILVERCREST PROPERTIES TIF Payment Project Fund TIF Payment 4251 202,673 CERIDIAN State Taxes Withheld Health and Benefits Taxes Withheld 210849 199,200 PRECISION SEALCOATING INC Crack Filling Street Maintenance Crack Filling 210804 196,764 LEAGUE MN CITIES INS TRUST Insurance Property Insurance Property Insurance 210762 133,673 FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING INC Other Contracted Services Sewer Capital SCADA System 210629 129,518 TE MILLER DEVELOPMENT LLC TIF Payment Project Fund TIF Payment 4249 129,374 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA Health and Benefits PERA 4247 119,841 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE Cash Over/Short General Fund Sales&Use Tax 210904 117,986 WINDSOR PLAZA LLC TIF Payment Project Fund TIF Payment 210914 116,935 XCEL ENERGY Electric Den Road Building Monthly Utility Payment 210435 109,930 DOMINIUM TIF Payment Project Fund TIF Payment 210630 101,138 TEALWOOD CARE CENTER TIF Payment Project Fund TIF Payment 210495 100,918 JOHN A DALSIN&SON INC Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital City Center Roof 211162 92,005 XCEL ENERGY Electric Public Safety Communications 210569 55,887 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LMTD PARTNERSH TIF Payment Project Fund 211031 41,190 JOHN DEERE GOVERNMENT&NATION Machinery&Equipment Park and Recreation 210909 40,699 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210799 39,949 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211011 39,770 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON Design&Engineering Engineering 210645 37,147 UNITED PROPERTIES TIF Payment Project Fund 210910 34,495 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 211263 34,300 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 211036 33,830 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Wine Domestic Prairie Village Liquor Store 211258 33,639 JOHN A DALSIN&SON INC Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital 210666 33,133 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Liquor Den Road Liquor Store 4248 32,552 US BANK July Purchasing Card Payment 210828 32,520 MOTOROLA Prepaid Expenses E-911 Program 210500 29,939 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO Wine Domestic Prairie View Liquor Store 210678 28,218 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC Operating Supplies Utility Operations-General 211051 25,899 LOGIS LOGIS IT Operating 210688 25,484 ABM JANITORIALSERVICES-NORTH C Janitor Service Utility Operations-General 211356 24,623 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Wine Domestic Den Road Liquor Store 210712 24,557 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC Improvements to Land Park Acquisition&Development 210857 24,069 QUALITY WINE&SPIRITS CO Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 4253 23,945 ING Deferred Compensation General Fund 210743 23,660 DIVERSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE Janitor Service Arts Center 4257 22,919 WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NA Interest HRA 2002A LEASE REVENUE BONDS 210432 22,437 DIVERSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE Janitor Service Arts Center 211136 22,226 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 211158 22,117 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 210915 22,065 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC Motor Fuels Fleet Operating 210886 21,879 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211213 21,091 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE Autos General Government 210803 20,418 LAVAN FLOOR COVERING Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital 211106 20,000 RES SPECIALTY PYROTECHNICS INC Other Contracted Services July 4th Celebration 210691 19,917 ADVANCED ENGINEERING&ENVIRON Design&Engineering Water Capital 210633 19,164 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Beer Den Road Liquor Store 210575 19,099 QUALITY WINE&SPIRITS CO Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store 210872 18,954 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Design&Engineering Transportation Fund 211239 18,499 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210752 17,873 ELK RIVER Autos Park and Recreation 211004 17,852 GREGERSON ROSOW JOHNSON&NILA Legal Legal Council 211157 17,786 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Liquor Prairie View Liquor Store 211349 17,771 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Deposits Escrow 211104 17,063 QUALITY WINE&SPIRITS CO Wine Domestic Prairie Village Liquor Store 211335 16,961 THORPE DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 4256 16,534 US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSN Interest 2003C Open Space Refunding Bon 211305 16,433 QUALITY WINE&SPIRITS CO Liquor Prairie View Liquor Store 4252 16,336 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Deferred Compensation General Fund 210808 16,101 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC Motor Fuels Fleet Operating 211168 15,855 PRAIRIE PARTNERS SIX LLP Building Rental Prairie Village Liquor Store 211209 15,684 DAY DISTRIBUTING Beer Den Road Liquor Store 210494 15,604 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESO Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 4255 15,447 CERIDIAN State Taxes Withheld Health and Benefits 210794 15,432 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210898 14,217 VTI Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital 211173 14,204 ACTION FLEET INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 211315 14,202 SHELTER CORPORATION TIF Payment Project Fund 211123 13,869 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAI Contract Svcs-General Bldg Public Safety Training Facilit 211257 13,061 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210740 12,932 DAY DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 210714 12,856 BONNER&BORHART LLP Legal Legal Criminal Prosecution 211030 12,389 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINNESO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210848 12,217 PRAIRIEVIEW RETAIL LLC Utilities Prairie View Liquor Store 211281 12,068 MINNESOTA DIRT WORKS INC Land Improvements Trails Referendum 210720 11,995 BRICO CONSTUCTION Other Contracted Services Rehab 210667 11,951 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER Beer Den Road Liquor Store 4261 11,735 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,INC HRA Health and Benefits 210693 11,511 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE Capital Under$10,000 FF&E-Furn,Fixtures&Equip. 210443 11,395 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS INC Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital 210880 10,800 TALEO CORPORATION Software Maintenance IT Operating 210488 10,692 HORNIG PROPERTIES TIF Payment Project Fund 211357 10,660 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 210838 10,639 PAUSTIS&SONS COMPANY Wine Imported Prairie Village Liquor Store 210566 10,585 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC Improvement Contracts CIP Trails 211297 10,136 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210567 10,000 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital 210841 9,779 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Wine Imported Prairie View Liquor Store 210952 9,681 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN Gas Water Treatment Plant 210742 9,512 DISPLAY ARTS Other Contracted Services Environmental Education 210516 9,315 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORT Life Insurance EE/ER Health and Benefits 210469 9,296 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211001 9,277 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210674 9,237 WSB&ASSOCIATES INC Improvement Contracts Improvement Projects 2006 210771 9,162 GRAYMONT Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210709 9,094 BELLBOY CORPORATION Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211064 9,043 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Seal Coating Street Maintenance 211364 8,924 ZIEGLER INC Contract Svcs-Fire/Life/Safe Public Works/Parks 210564 8,519 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Beer Prairie View Liquor Store 210426 8,373 DAY DISTRIBUTING Beer Den Road Liquor Store 210869 8,197 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- Printing Communications 210531 7,960 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Seal Coating Street Maintenance 210441 7,841 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC Equipment Repair&Maint Fire 211321 7,756 SOUTHERN WINE&SPIRITS OF MN Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211251 7,620 ICERINK SUPPLY CO Contract Svcs-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 210711 7,527 BIFFS INC Other Rentals Park Maintenance 211312 7,500 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service 211220 7,470 EHLERS&ASSOCIATES INC Other Contracted Services Project Fund 211240 7,462 GREENSIDE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint. Fire Station#1 210364 7,212 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE Disability Ins Employers Health and Benefits 211095 7,092 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Liquor Prairie View Liquor Store 211244 6,958 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 211125 6,933 SOUTHERN WINE&SPIRITS OF MN Liquor Prairie View Liquor Store 210611 6,817 SOUTHERN WINE&SPIRITS OF MN Wine Domestic Den Road Liquor Store 210663 6,762 WINE MERCHANTS INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210389 6,725 BELLBOY CORPORATION Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210680 6,647 ZIEGLER INC Building Facilities Capital 210690 6,627 ACCELERATED TECHNOLOGIES LLC Capital Under$10,000 Fitness Classes 211082 6,515 NORTHSHORE ADVISORS LLC Interest Investment Fund 211083 6,431 NORTHSTAR MUDJACKING SPECIALIS Improvement Contracts CIP Trails 210559 6,405 PAUSTIS&SONS COMPANY Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210704 6,363 AVI SYSTEMS INC Equipment Repair&Maint Communications 210868 6,194 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI Dues&Subscriptions City Council 211018 6,158 HENNEPIN SOUTH SERVICES COLLAB Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service 211108 6,000 RIGHTLINE DESIGN LLC Other Contracted Services Communications 211221 5,931 ERICKSON ENGINEERING COMPANY L Design&Engineering Engineering 210811 5,861 MAGIC BOUNCE INC Other Rentals July 4th Celebration 210877 5,742 STREICHERS Clothing&Uniforms Fire 210737 5,711 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT Machinery&Equipment Park and Recreation 211277 5,639 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 210867 5,523 SOUTHERN WINE&SPIRITS OF MN Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211283 5,387 MINNESOTA UI FUND Unemployment Compensation Organizational Services 210445 5,274 ESS BROTHERS&SONS INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer Capital 210995 5,257 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant 210736 5,216 COMPAR INC Other Assets Utility Operations-General 211184 5,067 BELLBOY CORPORATION Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 211215 5,039 DPC INDUSTRIES INC Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 211170 5,000 US POSTMASTER Postage Community Brochure 211353 4,999 WINE MERCHANTS INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210938 4,977 BELLBOY CORPORATION Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211118 4,916 SHI CORP Software IT Operating 210966 4,811 DAY DISTRIBUTING Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211329 4,699 STREICHERS Safety Supplies Fire 211298 4,646 PICHA GREENHOUSE Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 211245 4,516 HAWKINS INC Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210896 4,489 VERIZON WIRELESS Other Assets CIP-Bonds 210603 4,314 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC Design&Engineering Sewer Capital 210687 4,020 A-SCAPE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint. Den Bldg.-CAM 210876 4,000 STAR Conference Expense Facilities Staff 210550 3,849 NORTHSTAR MUDJACKING SPECIALIS Mudjacking Curbs Drainage 210873 3,847 ST CROIX ENVIRONMENTAL INC OCS-Well Field Mgmt Water Treatment Plant 210467 3,767 GRAINGER Supplies-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 211253 3,674 IND SCHOOL DIST 272 Other Contracted Services Oak Point Operations 210521 3,648 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Repair&Maint Storm Drainage 210719 3,612 BRAUER& ASSOCIATES LTD Other Contracted Services Park Acquisition&Development 211003 3,591 GREENSIDE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint. Fire Station#1 210746 3,513 DYNAMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS INC Other Assets CIP-Bonds 210782 3,507 HOHENSTEINS INC Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 211276 3,500 MICHAELSON,ELIZABETH H Operating Supplies Theatre Initiative 211229 3,464 FORTIN CONSULTING INC Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 210541 3,430 MOLCO INC Other Contracted Services Rehab 210408 3,376 CERIDIAN Ceridian IT Operating 211342 3,342 VAN PAPER COMPANY Cleaning Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210790 3,337 J A PRICE AGENCY INC Insurance Property Insurance 211294 3,317 PAUSTIS&SONS COMPANY Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210882 3,250 TEENS ALONE Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service 210481 3,244 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Board of Prisoner Police 211273 3,219 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* Office Supplies Utility Operations-General 210821 3,191 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION Repair&Maint. Supplies Storm Drainage 210745 3,161 DPC INDUSTRIES INC Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210381 3,155 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC. Waste Disposal Den Bldg.-CAM 211362 3,087 XCEL ENERGY Electric Forest Hills Park 210650 3,057 VAN PAPER COMPANY Cleaning Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 211246 3,055 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Tuition Reimbursement/School Fire 211084 3,053 NORTHWORKS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Employment Support Test Organizational Services 211302 3,030 PURCHASE POWER Postage Customer Service 210776 3,027 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Equipment Parts Water System Maintenance 210844 3,000 POSTAGE BY PHONE RESERVE ACCOU Postage Customer Service 210734 2,986 CLAREYS INC Safety Supplies Fleet Operating 210484 2,965 HINES&SONS INC Other Contracted Services Street Maintenance 211007 2,949 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 211274 2,945 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 211256 2,922 INTEREUM INC Capital Under$10,000 FF&E-Furn,Fixtures&Equip. 210751 2,918 ELECTRIC PUMP Equipment Repair&Maint Sewer Liftstation 211254 2,890 INFRARED CONSULTING SERVICES I Contract Svcs-Electrical City Hall-CAM 210906 2,857 WINE MERCHANTS INC Wine Domestic Prairie Village Liquor Store 211358 2,743 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC Seal Coating Street Maintenance 210830 2,683 NILSSON,BETH Instructor Service Ice Rink#1 211352 2,678 WINE COMPANY,THE Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210514 2,630 LEAGUE MN CITIES INS TRUST Insurance Property Insurance 210953 2,616 CERIDIAN Ceridian IT Operating 210947 2,556 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Other Contracted Services Parks Referendum Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210525 2,500 MEALS ON WHEELS Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service 211249 2,449 HOHENSTEINS INC Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 211130 2,438 STREICHERS Clothing&Uniforms Police 210386 2,390 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY Tires Fleet Operating 211234 2,301 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 210879 2,276 SURLY BREWING CO Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 210963 2,163 COSTCO Merchandise for Resale Concessions 210701 2,147 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. Machinery&Equipment Public Works 211350 2,115 WHEELER LUMBER LLC Landscape Materials/Supp Staring Lake 210536 2,112 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP Electric Riley Lake 210465 2,088 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL OCS-Leak Detection Utility Operations-General 211155 2,080 WINE MERCHANTS INC Wine Domestic Prairie View Liquor Store 210662 2,069 WINE COMPANY,THE Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210894 2,048 VALLEY RICH CO INC Equipment Repair&Maint Water System Maintenance 211346 2,032 WALL TRENDS INC Contract Svcs-General Bldg City Hall-CAM 211182 2,013 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY Tires Fleet Operating 210675 2,013 XCEL ENERGY Insurance Property Insurance 211289 2,012 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210866 2,000 SNETTING,TIM Tuition Reimbursement/School Organizational Services 210483 1,911 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC Other Rentals Water System Maintenance 210379 1,908 APRES Other Rentals July 4th Celebration 210934 1,903 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 210410 1,900 CHAD HOLDER PHOTOGRAPHY Operating Supplies Fire 210819 1,896 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* Other Rentals Customer Service 211132 1,887 SUNFLOWER MARKETING Instructor Service Tennis 4258 1,878 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,INC Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits 211319 1,863 SNEEN,NICOLE D Other Contracted Services Softball 211024 1,842 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI Union Dues Withheld General Fund 211223 1,833 ESS BROTHERS&SONS INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Storm Drainage 211019 1,777 HIRSHFIELD'S Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 210905 1,767 WINE COMPANY,THE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211265 1,750 KRAFT,MATTHEW E Other Contracted Services Theatre Initiative 210622 1,742 STREICHERS Clothing&Uniforms Police 210371 1,737 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES Repair&Maint. Supplies Storm Drainage 211310 1,736 RUTTGER'S SUGAR LAKE LODGE Conference Expense Facilities Staff 210788 1,720 INSTRUMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Equipment Repair&Maint Water Treatment Plant 210741 1,710 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Software Maintenance IT Operating 211121 1,709 SILVER STAR INDUSTRIES Machinery&Equipment Fire 210647 1,696 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC Pager&Cell Phone Public Safety Communications 210911 1,695 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC Other Assets Park Acquisition&Dev Fixed A 211147 1,647 VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS BENEFIT Dues&Subscriptions Fire 210476 1,641 HAWKINS INC Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210676 1,633 XH LLC Beer/Wine Licenses General Fund 211124 1,629 SOUTH ST PAUL STEEL SUPPLY Signs Park Maintenance 211021 1,617 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Supplies-General Bldg Garden Room Repairs 211154 1,615 WINE COMPANY,THE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210397 1,608 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Improvement Contracts Improvement Projects 2006 211142 1,604 VAN PAPER COMPANY C H Robinson-Cleaning Suppli City Hall-Direct Costs 210526 1,575 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS Special Event Fees Trips 211092 1,569 PAUSTIS&SONS COMPANY Transportation Den Road Liquor Store Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210834 1,558 NOVAK STUMP REMOVAL Other Contracted Services Tree Removal 210728 1,544 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Gas Water Treatment Plant 210874 1,535 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 210480 1,531 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI Board of Prisoner Police 211053 1,502 MAACO Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210374 1,488 AMERICAN RED CROSS Licenses,Permits,Fees Pool Lessons 210770 1,487 GRAPE BEGINNINGS Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210486 1,475 HOFF,BARRY&KOZAR,P.A. Legal Legal Council 210899 1,475 WALL TRENDS INC Contract Svcs-General Bldg Police City Center 211331 1,430 SURLY BREWING CO Beer Den Road Liquor Store 210748 1,419 ECOLAB INC Contract Svcs-Pest Control Housing and Human Svcs 210420 1,417 CORVAL CONSTRUCTORS INC Contract Svcs-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 210941 1,411 BIFFS INC Waste Disposal Park Maintenance 211169 1,405 RICHFIELD,CITY OF Autos General Government 211189 1,400 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC EMS Supplies Fire 211091 1,384 OUTDOORS AGAIN INC Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 211159 1,384 WORK CONNECTION,THE Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 211144 1,381 VINOCOPIA Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210539 1,335 MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING INC Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210912 1,332 WORK CONNECTION,THE Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 210414 1,321 CLAREYS INC Safety Supplies Senior Center Admin 211187 1,320 BLOOMINGTON,CITY OF Impound Fees Animal Control 211236 1,315 GRAINGER Operating Supplies City Hall-CAM 210721 1,309 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Repair&Maint. Supplies Storm Drainage 210684 1,308 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC Contract Svcs-Elevator Senior Center 210739 1,295 DALE GREEN COMPANY,THE Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 211194 1,283 BROCK WHITE COMPANY LLC Building Materials Staring Lake 210822 1,281 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM Misc Non-Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 211248 1,276 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC Improvement Contracts CIP Trails 211175 1,268 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 210558 1,268 PAUL'S TWO-WAY RADIO Other Contracted Services Public Safety Communications 211317 1,264 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC Design&Engineering Sewer Capital 210773 1,253 GUNDERSON,CONSTANCE L. Instructor Service Arts Center 210726 1,251 CAREER TRACK Conference Expense Water Treatment Plant 210784 1,250 HOMELINE Other Contracted Services Housing and Community Service 210471 1,245 H M CRAGG CO Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210809 1,230 M-K GRAPHICS Operating Supplies Finance 210677 1,219 YALE MECHANICAL INC Building Repair&Maint. Water Treatment Plant 210959 1,217 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP Refunds CDBG-Public Service 210713 1,214 BOLD,PAULINE Instructor Service Outdoor Center 211199 1,212 CHEMSEARCH Supplies-HVAC City Hall-CAM 210384 1,211 BATTERIES PLUS Supplies-Electrical Fire Station#3 211337 1,202 TREES BY FORREST Other Contracted Services Tree Removal 210722 1,201 BUCK,NATHAN Other Contracted Services Softball 210860 1,195 RICHFIELD,CITY OF Autos Park and Recreation 210450 1,191 FASTENAL COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210671 1,191 WORK CONNECTION,THE Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 210612 1,167 SPIRIT APPAREL&STUFF Clothing&Uniforms Riley Lake Beach 210996 1,160 GRAFIX SHOPPE Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210761 1,145 FLYING CLOUD T/S#U70 Waste Disposal Park Maintenance Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211068 1,140 MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 211287 1,133 NAGARALE,ARUN Insurance Property Insurance 210380 1,132 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211316 1,099 SHI CORP Software IT Operating 210767 1,083 GOODWAY TECHNOLOGIES CORP Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant 210979 1,080 EDEN PRAIRIE FIREFIGHTER'S REL Union Dues Withheld General Fund 211129 1,056 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Police 210405 1,047 CARDIAC SCIENCE CORPORATION EMS Supplies Fire 210792 1,042 JASPER ENGINEERING&EQUIPMENT Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant 211365 1,035 ZOELLNER,MARK Other Contracted Services Softball 211109 1,012 ROGERS,KYLE Other Contracted Services Softball 211002 1,000 GREEN MILL Awards Athletic Programs Admin 211023 1,000 INNOVATIVE GRAPHICS Clothing&Uniforms Playgrounds 210943 980 BOLD,PAULINE Instructor Service Outdoor Center 211210 978 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210725 976 CARDIOVISION Video&Photo Supplies Fitness Center 211359 966 WORK CONNECTION,THE Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 211078 966 NEUMANN,NEAL Other Contracted Services Softball 210510 961 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance 211167 959 PETTY CASH 210824 955 MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 211196 936 BUCK,NATHAN Other Contracted Services Softball 210845 929 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY Contract Svcs-Fire/Life/Safe Police City Center 210758 926 FASTSIGNS Advertising July 4th Celebration 211055 915 MAECK,TOM Other Contracted Services Community Band 211181 914 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY Operating Supplies Inspections-Administration 210685 911 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 210895 911 VAN PAPER COMPANY Cleaning Supplies Facilites Operating ISF 211032 906 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 210453 904 FIRE SAFETY USA INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fire 211128 887 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 210454 870 FIRST SUPPLY Supplies-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210754 858 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC Repair&Maint. Supplies Sewer Capital 211313 855 SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS INC Other Contracted Services Tree Removal 211278 851 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM Misc Non-Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 210785 843 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Supplies-Pool Pool Maintenance 211224 841 ETHANOL PRODUCTS LLC Treatment Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210692 840 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES Repair&Maint. Supplies Storm Drainage 211116 828 SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210527 827 MENARDS Supplies-General Bldg Senior Center 210655 817 WALDOR PUMP&EQUIPMENT CO Contract Svcs-Plumbing Fire Station#1 210502 812 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Supplies-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 211290 807 OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS Janitor Service City Hall-CAM 211000 806 GRAPE BEGINNINGS Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210949 804 CANNON RIVER WINERY Wine Domestic Prairie Village Liquor Store 210815 800 MARTIN-MCALLISTER Employment Support Test Organizational Services 211138 797 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE&SUPPLY Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 210387 795 BCA/CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING Tuition Reimbursement/School Police 210768 794 GRAINGER Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 4245 794 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE Motor Fuels Fleet Operating Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210847 794 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 211271 786 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL Supplies-HVAC City Hall-CAM 211338 763 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC Building Repair&Maint. Utility Operations-General 211334 760 TESSMAN SEED CO Chemicals Park Maintenance 210468 748 GRAND PERE WINES INC Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211272 743 MENARDS Supplies-General Bldg Riley House 211010 740 HANLINE,M J AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211299 730 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC Equipment Repair&Maint Water System Maintenance 210464 729 GODWIN,MARIE B Other Contracted Services Softball 210606 722 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR Operating Supplies Police 211177 715 AMARA WINES LLC Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210626 705 SW METRO TRANSIT Deposits Escrow 211211 700 DIETHELM,TAMMY L Other Contracted Services Pleasant Hill Cemetery 211293 700 PAUL,CYRIL Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210423 699 CWH RESEARCH INC. Employment Support Test Fire 210839 694 PETERSON BROS ROOFING AND CONS Contract Svcs-Roof Ice Arena Maintenance 211282 681 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC Contract Svcs-Elevator Senior Center 211241 677 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC Contract Svcs-Electrical Cummins Grill House 210638 676 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE&SUPPLY Misc Non-Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 4254 672 CERIDIAN Garnishment Withheld General Fund 210649 666 VALLEY PAVING INC Deposits Escrow 211233 662 GE CAPITAL Other Rentals Customer Service 210935 660 BATES,DON Other Contracted Services Community Band 211242 653 HACH COMPANY Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210417 652 CONCRETE CUTTING&CORING INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210425 652 DALE GREEN COMPANY,THE Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 210778 650 HELGESON,GLEN Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210946 649 BOYER TRUCKS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210843 646 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC Tires Fleet Operating 210582 637 REPLENEX Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211264 636 KEEPERS Clothing&Uniforms Reserves 210505 625 KIDCREATE STUDIO Instructor Service Arts Center 210585 625 RICHARD ALAN PRODUCTIONS Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210578 624 RAY,LEE Other Contracted Services Basketball 210534 610 MINNESOTA AWWA Conference Expense Water Treatment Plant 210859 610 READY WATT ELECTRIC Equipment Repair&Maint Emergency Preparedness 211360 610 WORKING FIRE TRAINING Training Supplies Fire 211275 605 MIAMA Conference Expense Facilities Staff 210614 603 SPORTS UNLIMITED Instructor Service Camps 210503 600 KAISER,DAVID S Equipment Repair&Maint Fitness Center 210637 600 TRESIDDER,JEFFREY Printing Fire 211061 600 METRO ELEVATOR INC Contract Svcs-Elevator City Hall-CAM 210625 599 SURLY BREWING CO Beer Prairie View Liquor Store 211195 594 BROWN,PAUL Other Contracted Services Volleyball 210997 592 GRAINGER Cleaning Supplies Utility Operations-General 210600 592 SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 211308 583 QWEST Telephone E-911 Program 4250 575 CERIDIAN Garnishment Withheld General Fund 210504 573 KEEPERS Clothing&Uniforms Fire 210497 569 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN Maintenance Contracts Water Treatment Plant Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210479 564 HENNEPIN COUNTY UT DEPT Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210820 561 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210634 561 TKO WINES,INC Wine Imported Prairie Village Liquor Store 210507 550 KOCHER,SUSAN Instructor Service Outdoor Center 210512 549 LANO EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210858 546 RAY,LEE Other Contracted Services Softball 210885 543 THE OASIS GROUP Employee Assistance Organizational Services 210368 541 A-SCAPE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint Fire Station#4 210780 534 HENNEPIN COUNTY UT DEPT Software Maintenance IT Operating 211163 533 XCEL ENERGY Improvement Contracts CIP Trails 210833 530 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210890 530 TWIN CITY SEED CO Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 210524 529 MCGREGOR,RANDY Other Contracted Services Softball 210991 528 FRIENDSHIP VENTURES Special Event Fees Teen Programs 211188 528 BOLD,PAULINE Instructor Service Outdoor Center 210696 528 AMERITRAK Other Contracted Services Snow&Ice Control 211191 528 BOURGET IMPORTS Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210542 527 MPX GROUP,THE Printing Assessing 210698 526 APRES Building Rental Summer Theatre 211006 525 GUNDERSON,CONSTANCE L. Instructor Service Arts Center 210766 518 GENERAL MACHINING INC. Equipment Repair&Maint Water Storage 211322 516 SPECIALTY TURF&AG INC Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 210747 513 EARL F ANDERSEN INC Signs Traffic Signs 210891 507 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Clothing&Uniforms Police 210810 505 MAACO Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 211105 504 QWEST Telephone IT Telephone 210470 500 GUNDERSON,CONSTANCE L. Instructor Service Arts Center 210523 500 MCCULLOUGH,SCOTT Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 211122 500 SOUNDS OF HOPE LTD Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210702 493 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC. Waste Disposal Public Works/Parks 210812 488 MANBECK,KEVIN Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210962 484 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Repair&Maint. Supplies Utility Operations-General 210760 484 FERRELLGAS Gas Riley House 210656 483 WASTL,GREG Other Contracted Services Softball 210980 483 EF JOHNSON Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210444 481 ESCH CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC Improvement Contracts CIP Trails 211139 481 TWIN CITY SEED CO Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 210409 479 CERTIFIED APPLIANCE RECYCLING Other Contracted Services Recycle Rebate 210865 478 SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210901 476 WHEELER LUMBER LLC Building Materials Improvement Projects 2006 211081 472 NORTH STAR PUMP SERVICE Equipment Repair&Maint Sewer Liftstation 211172 470 ACCELERATED TECHNOLOGIES LLC Operating Supplies Gymnasium(CC) 210998 468 GRAND PERE WINES INC Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store 211176 465 AL&ALMA'S SUPPER CLUB AND CH Special Event Fees Trips 211097 464 PLUS RELOCATION AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210543 464 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210861 464 RUE,RODNEY Mileage&Parking Engineering 210988 461 FASTSIGNS Operating Supplies Ice Rink#1 211038 460 KEEPERS Clothing&Uniforms Police 211087 458 OEDEKOVEN,KIMBERLY R Instructor Service Arts Center Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211280 457 MILLARD,CHRIS Travel Expense Police 211149 453 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210482 450 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Other Rentals Recycle Rebate 210673 450 WRIGHT,JOHN Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 211088 450 OKEE DOKEE BROTHERS,THE Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 211230 450 FOWLER,JULIE V Instructor Service Arts Center 210461 449 GE CAPITAL Other Rentals Customer Service 211135 448 TESSMAN SEED CO Seal Coating Street Maintenance 210769 447 GRAND PERE WINES INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210884 447 TESSMAN SEED CO Chemicals Park Maintenance 210579 443 REBS MARKETING Other Contracted Services Water Accounting 211300 441 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY Other Contracted Services Facilities Capital 210994 440 GE CAPITAL Other Rentals Customer Service 211348 437 WASTL,GREG Other Contracted Services Softball 211238 436 GRAPE BEGINNINGS Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210418 436 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT Repair&Maint-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 211307 431 QWEST Process Control Services Water Treatment Plant 211314 430 SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211192 423 BOYER TRUCKS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210705 420 BANK BEER CO Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 211309 416 RAY,LEE Other Contracted Services Softball 211228 413 FIRST SUPPLY Supplies-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210729 412 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Equipment Repair&Maint Storm Drainage 210787 410 INFRATECH Repair&Maint. Supplies Sewer System Maintenance 210628 410 TAYLOR,EMILY Instructor Service Arts Center 210802 405 LANZI,BOB Mileage&Parking Ice Rink#1 210547 404 NEHL,CHERI Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 211216 404 EARL F ANDERSEN INC Signs Traffic Signs 210916 400 CARVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. Deposits Escrow 210716 397 BOURGET IMPORTS Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store 210823 396 MINNEAPOLIS AIRPORT COMMISSION Other Rentals Park Maintenance 210984 395 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Equipment Parts Emergency Preparedness 210489 394 IN THE HEART OF THE BEAST Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210897 394 VINOCOPIA Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210398 391 BROCK WHITE COMPANY LLC Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer Capital 210439 391 ELIASON,STEVE J Other Contracted Services Softball 210749 389 EDEN PRAIRIE MALL LLC Building Rental Police 210731 380 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 210533 378 MINNESOTA ATHLETIC APPAREL Canine Supplies Police 210765 376 GE CAPITAL Other Rentals Customer Service 211099 375 PROP United Way Withheld General Fund 211185 375 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 210446 375 EXECUTIVE OCEAN Awards City Council 211193 374 BROADWAY RENTAL EQUIPMENT CO Equipment Repair&Maint Water System Maintenance 211325 372 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Customer Service 210382 370 ASSOCIATION OF MN EMERGENCY MA Dues&Subscriptions Fire 210434 370 DOMACE VINO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211079 369 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 211328 368 STINSON,STEVEN J Other Contracted Services Softball 210900 365 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC Design&Engineering Storm Drainage Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211074 365 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211098 362 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC Other Contracted Services Storm Drainage 210919 362 A-SCAPE INC Contract Svcs-Lawn Maint Fire Station#4 211343 362 VERIZON WIRELESS Pager&Cell Phone Park Maintenance 210813 360 MANDEL,MELISSA Instructor Service Arts Center 211291 357 PARK JEEP INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210406 356 CBIZ FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits 211133 356 SURLY BREWING CO Beer Prairie View Liquor Store 210836 352 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211344 351 VINOCOPIA Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 211301 350 PUCHALSKI,MARY Instructor Service Arts Center 210515 350 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Conference Expense Administration 210924 350 AFTER 5 Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 211131 350 STROHMYER,TOM Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 211151 350 WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NA Paying Agent 2005 G.O.Imp.Revolving Fund 211222 350 ERICKSON,GIZELLE Operating Supplies Theatre Initiative 211207 349 CUSTOM HOSE TECH Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211179 348 AMERICAN RED CROSS Licenses,Permits,Fees Pool Lessons 210871 346 SPS COMPANIES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 210893 346 VALLEY NAT'L GASES-LOC 93 Motor Fuels Fleet Operating 211363 345 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 211214 343 DOMACE VINO Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 211330 340 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210654 338 VTI Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210366 337 2ND WIND EXERCISE Repair&Maint. Supplies Fitness Center 210733 337 CITI-CARGO&STORAGE CO,INC Other Rentals Summer Theatre 210864 336 SGC HORIZON LLC Improvement Contracts Improvement Projects 2006 211115 336 SGC HORIZON LLC Improvement Contracts Improvement Projects 2006 210421 331 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS MIDWE Equipment Parts Storm Drainage 211347 326 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210706 324 BARNES,BELINDA A. Other Contracted Services Volleyball 210772 324 GS DIRECT Operating Supplies Engineering 210487 322 HOLMES,TOM Other Contracted Services Softball 210986 322 FALCK,TIMOTHY R Other Contracted Services Softball 211180 321 AMERIPRIDE LINEN&APPAREL SER Repair&Maint.Supplies Den Road Liquor Store 211137 321 TOUGH CUT SERVICES Other Contracted Services Tree Disease 211060 321 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 210370 320 ADAMS PEST CONTROL INC Other Contracted Services Water Treatment Plant 210576 319 QWEST Telephone IT Telephone 211080 319 NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 211134 319 TEFLER LAWN&LANDSCAPING Other Contracted Services Park Maintenance 210490 319 INFRATECH Equipment Parts Sewer System Maintenance 210951 316 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. Software Housing and Community Service 210755 315 EXTREME BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 211225 315 EXTREME BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 210392 315 BIFFS INC Other Rentals Recycle Rebate 210807 314 LEXISNEXIS Other Contracted Services Police 211197 312 CAREER TRACK Conference Expense Finance 210433 311 DNR Clothing&Uniforms Summer Theatre 210965 308 DALE GREEN COMPANY,THE Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210565 305 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 210697 305 ANDERBERG INNOVATIVE PRINT SOL Printing Police 210682 303 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS INC. Waste Disposal Utility Operations-General 211345 300 VOLK PLUMBING&HEATING Other Contracted Services Sewer Capital 210609 300 SOUNDS GREAT Other Contracted Services Recreation Admin 210835 300 NUTRITIONAL WEIGHT&WELLNESS Other Contracted Services Organizational Services 210981 299 ELIASON,STEVE J Other Contracted Services Softball 211042 299 KRAMER,TRENT C Other Contracted Services Softball 211250 299 HOLMES,TOM Other Contracted Services Softball 210989 297 FEIGENBAUM,SUSAN Instructor Service Arts Center 210738 297 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Operating Supplies Reserves 210779 296 HENNEPIN CO TAXPAYER SERVICES Software Maintenance IT Operating 210902 293 WICKSTROM,SHERRY BUTCHER Mileage&Parking City Council 210699 293 AQUA ENGINEERING INC Grounds Maintenance Utility Operations-General 210715 293 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC EMS Supplies Fire 210411 288 CHARLEY,ANGELA Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210875 285 STAPLES ADVANTAGE Office Supplies Customer Service 210817 282 MENARDS Supplies-Plumbing Riley House 210635 280 TONJES,MADDELYN Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211012 276 HART,EDMUND Other Contracted Services Softball 210493 275 JEFFERSON FIRE&SAFETY INC Protective Clothing Fire 211008 275 HALE,WILLIAM Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210457 274 FREUDENBERG,JASON A Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210695 272 AMERIPRIDE LINEN&APPAREL SER Cleaning Supplies Prairie View Liquor Store 210447 271 EXTREME BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 210532 270 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM Misc Taxable Prairie View Liquor Store 210627 270 TACKMIER,KARIE Other Contracted Services Volleyball 210694 268 AMERICAN BOTTLING COMPANY,THE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 211110 267 SARAH PIERCE PHOTOGRAPHY Other Contracted Services Communications 210615 265 SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant 211266 265 LANO EQUIPMENT INC Other Rentals Street Maintenance 210390 261 BERRETH,GRAYSON Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210492 261 JASKULKE,TARYN L Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210552 261 NOURAEE,CYRUS Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210590 261 ROSENWINKEL,RICHARD Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210607 261 SKOBOV,NIKITA Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211219 261 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC Equipment Parts Emergency Preparedness 210774 260 HACH COMPANY Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 210920 260 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING Other Contracted Services Senior Center Programs 211255 257 INFRATECH Repair&Maint. Supplies Sewer Capital 211235 255 GLEWWE DOORS INC Building Repair&Maint. Water Treatment Plant 4244 250 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,INC HRA Health and Benefits 210404 250 CAMPBELL KNUTSON,P.A. Licenses&Taxes WAFTA 210537 250 MINNETONKA FIRE DEPARTMENT Safety Supplies Fire 211267 250 LAW ENFORCMENT TARGETS INC Training Supplies Police 210850 249 PREMIUM WATERS INC Operating Supplies Fire 210982 249 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIA Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 211016 248 HENNEPIN CO TAXPAYER SERVICES Software Maintenance IT Operating 211339 246 TWIN CITY SEED CO Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 211326 244 STAR TRIBUNE MEDIA COMPANY LLC Dues&Subscriptions Fire Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210956 243 CHRISTIANSEN,JULIE AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211323 243 SPRINT Wireless Subscription IT Operating 210369 242 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 210881 240 TAYLOR,EMILY Instructor Service AC-New Adaptive 210403 235 CALDWELL,JOSEPH C Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210587 235 ROBB,ERIN Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210624 234 SUPERIOR WINE IMPORTS Wine Imported Prairie View Liquor Store 211217 232 EDEN PRAIRIE NOON ROTARY CLUB Miscellaneous Community Development Admin. 210597 231 SELL,NATALIE Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210657 231 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES IN OCS-Utility Locates Water System Maintenance 210588 229 ROBB,NICK Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211284 228 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance 211178 225 AMERICAN BOTTLING COMPANY,THE Misc Taxable Prairie View Liquor Store 210854 225 QUALITY REFRIGERATION Repair&Maint. Supplies Concessions 211090 225 ONCE UPON A STAR Instructor Service CC-Special Events&Trips 211114 221 SEELYE Equipment Repair&Maint Water Treatment Plant 210973 219 DMX MUSIC Other Contracted Services Prairie View Liquor Store 211351 219 WHITE,NICOLE Mileage&Parking Therapeutic Rec Admin 210889 218 TORKELSON,MARILYNN Refunds Storm Drainage 211141 217 UNITED WAY United Way Withheld General Fund 210623 217 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210945 217 BOURGET IMPORTS Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store 210853 216 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance 210478 216 HEFFERAN,CINDI Mileage&Parking Day Care 210870 216 SPERR,MARK Other Contracted Services Volleyball 211076 216 MUSSELL,KATELIN Other Contracted Services Volleyball 211057 214 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210538 213 MINT CONDITION DETAILING INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210642 213 TYRA-LUKENS,NANCY Mileage&Parking Records Management 210960 213 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES United Way Withheld General Fund 210652 212 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210975 211 DMX MUSIC Other Contracted Services Den Road Liquor Store 211069 210 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIAT Dues&Subscriptions Utility Operations-General 211186 210 BIFFS INC Waste Disposal Park Maintenance 210831 209 NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES Laboratory Chemicals Water Treatment Plant 211336 209 TIRE TOWN INC Other Contracted Services Ice Arena Maintenance 210437 209 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY CLUB Miscellaneous Fire 210862 208 SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVI Supplies-HVAC City Hall-CAM 210783 207 HOLMES,TOM Other Contracted Services Softball 210683 206 COMCAST Wireless Subscription IT Operating 210440 206 ELIM SHORES INC Special Event Fees Red Hat 210580 205 REESE,BETH Deposits Community Center Admin 210383 202 BALLANTINE,NOELLE Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210378 200 APOGEE RETAIL LLC Other Contracted Services Recycle Rebate 210401 200 BURTIS,ROBERT J Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 211247 200 HERRIGES,GREG Other Contracted Services Staring Lake Concert 210967 198 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVI Other Rentals Facilities Staff 211200 198 CLARK,CARA Mileage&Parking Tree Disease 211218 197 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY CLUB Dues&Subscriptions Fire 210661 196 WILLIAMS,COLIN Other Contracted Services Teen Programs Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 211020 194 HOLMES,TOM Other Contracted Services Softball 210744 193 DNR Clothing&Uniforms Theatre Initiative 211190 193 BOUNDLESS NETWORK Clothing&Uniforms Facilities Staff 211146 192 VOLAVKA,LYNDA Other Contracted Services July 4th Celebration 210598 189 SGC HORIZON LLC Legal Notices Publishing Water Capital 210431 187 DIRECTV Cable TV Community Center Admin 211205 187 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Program Trips Outdoor Center 211063 186 METROPOLITAN FORD Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210556 186 PAPCO INC Janitor Service Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210477 184 HEALY,STEPHEN Other Contracted Services Softball 211243 184 HAHN,MICHAEL J Other Contracted Services Softball 211206 183 CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC. Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210572 183 PUCHALSKI,MARY Instructor Service Arts Center 210851 180 PRINTERS SERVICE INC Contract Svcs-Ice Rink Ice Arena Maintenance 210971 179 DESIGN DESIGN Transportation Prairie View Liquor Store 211237 175 GRAND PERE WINES INC Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 4260 174 OPTUM HEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICE Other Contracted Services Health and Benefits 210750 171 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC Repair&Maint. Supplies Emergency Preparedness 211014 170 HEGGESTAD,MARK AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210475 170 HAUNG,JEELING Deposits Community Center Admin 210581 170 REMAX AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210759 169 FEIDT,ADAM M Travel Expense IT Operating 210528 164 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach 210922 162 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING Other Contracted Services Senior Center Programs 211311 161 SCHMIDT,KURT Other Contracted Services Softball 210883 161 TESSCO INC Equipment Parts Public Safety Communications 211113 160 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC Waste Disposal Fleet Operating 210583 159 RETROFIT RECYCLING INC Waste Disposal City Hall-CAM 210518 159 LIU,TINA Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210605 159 SINGH,OWEN Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210621 159 STONE,ERIC Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211096 158 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 211306 157 QUILL.COM Cleaning Supplies Utility Operations-General 210573 156 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance 210801 155 LAGERQUIST ELEVATOR INC Contract Svcs-Elevator Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 211059 154 MENARDS Grounds Maintenance Utility Operations-General 210419 152 CORBIN,ZACHARY Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210456 150 FITOAM Dues&Subscriptions Fire 210599 150 SHAH,VIJAY Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210961 150 CONANGLA,C S AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211022 150 HUYS,ANDREW J Instructor Service Outdoor Center 211028 150 JENSEN,JORDAN Improvement Contracts CIP Trails 210925 150 ALLEN,MARK AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210917 149 SPECIALTY STORE SERVICES Operating Supplies Den Road Liquor Store 210827 149 MN MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT INC Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance 210568 148 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 210672 147 WORLD WIDE CELLARS INC Transportation Den Road Liquor Store 210825 146 MINNESOTA PRINT MANAGEMENT LLC Office Supplies Customer Service 210648 146 UTING,TRAVIS Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211009 146 HALLENBECK,KATHRYN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210660 145 WHEELER,JACOB Training Supplies Fire 210596 141 SCHARBER&SONS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210929 141 AMERIPRIDE LINEN&APPAREL SER Janitor Service Prairie Village Liquor Store 210413 140 CITROWSKI,BRYAN Deposits Community Center Admin 210653 140 VINUP,HALEY Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211340 139 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211150 139 WALSH,JAMES AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210473 139 HAMES,SEAN Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210519 139 LOCATORS&SUPPLIES INC Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 210686 139 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER Operating Supplies Safety Camp 210545 138 MYHRE,NIKKI Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210805 135 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Other Contracted Services Animal Control 211270 135 MANDEL,MELISSA Instructor Service Arts Center 210522 135 MAHMUTOVIC,DZEVAD Mileage&Parking Facilities Staff 211174 134 ADAMS PEST CONTROL INC Other Contracted Services Water Treatment Plant 210913 133 WYDRA,TEEGAN Mileage&Parking Tree Disease 211045 133 LAMERS,ANDREW Mileage&Parking Tree Disease 210375 132 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINES Clothing&Uniforms Community Center Admin 211101 130 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance 210930 129 ARRIBAS,ROY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211204 128 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210636 128 TOUGH CUT SERVICES Other Contracted Services Tree Disease 211071 128 440400-NCPERS MINNESOTA PERA Health and Benefits 210520 127 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210363 126 KEMMERER,DAVID R Deposits Escrow 210632 125 TESSCO INC Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210586 125 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211077 125 NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICERS ASS Dues&Subscriptions Police 210921 122 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING Other Contracted Services Senior Center Programs 210832 120 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION Supplies-HVAC Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210517 120 LIFT BRIDGE BREWERY Beer Prairie Village Liquor Store 210616 120 SQUARE CUT Other Contracted Services Senior Center Admin 211029 120 JERUE,WILLIAM AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210987 119 FASTENAL COMPANY Building Materials Improvement Projects 2006 211333 118 TACTICAL COMMAND INDUSTRIES, Clothing&Uniforms Police 210367 118 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER Operating Supplies Fire 210584 118 RHINES,MELVIN Deposits Community Center Admin 210710 117 BERTELSON TOTAL OFFICE SOLUTIO Office Supplies Utility Operations-General 211318 116 SHRED-IT Other Contracted Services Community Center Admin 210923 114 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VETERINAR Other Contracted Services Animal Control 210549 114 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Transportation Prairie Village Liquor Store 210427 112 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211285 112 MINT CONDITION DETAILING INC Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210540 111 MOEN,ANNA Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210472 111 HALLOCK COMPANY INC Equipment Parts Water Treatment Plant 211303 109 QUALITY PROPANE Motor Fuels Ice Arena Maintenance 211361 109 WYDRA,TEEGAN Mileage&Parking Tree Disease 210407 108 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Gas Prairie View Liquor Store 210376 107 AMERIPRIDE LINEN&APPAREL SER Operating Supplies Prairie Village Liquor Store 211047 107 LEIVERMAN,STEVE&SALLY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210452 106 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210679 105 YOUNG,JEFFREY Deposits Community Center Admin 211041 104 KRAFT,MATTHEW E Other Contracted Services Theatre Initiative 210466 100 GRACE CHURCH CATERING Canine Supplies Police 210546 100 NALLAMALLI,MAURTHI Deposits Community Center Admin 210753 100 ENVIROMATIC CORP Cash Over/Short General Fund 210826 100 MINNESOTA RECREATION&PARK AS Other Contracted Services Community Center Admin 211119 100 SHRED-IT Waste Disposal City Center Operations 211269 100 MACIA Tuition Reimbursement/School Police 211332 100 T-MOBILE USA Other Contracted Services Police 211212 100 DIRECTV Cable TV Community Center Admin 210950 99 CASE,RON Mileage&Parking Administration 210608 99 SNAP-ON TOOLS Small Tools Fleet Operating 210617 99 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS NC Supplies-Security Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210983 97 EXTREME BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Prairie View Liquor Store 210644 96 UNDHEIM,NAOMI Mileage&Parking Community Center Admin 210958 94 COMCAST Dues&Subscriptions City Council 210412 94 CHOUNLAMONTRY,VONGKHAM AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 4246 93 VANCO SERVICES Miscellaneous Community Center Admin 211288 93 NORCOSTCO Clothing&Uniforms Theatre Initiative 211013 92 HEALY,STEPHEN Other Contracted Services Softball 211117 92 SHAROCKMAN,BRETT AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210385 91 BATTLE LAKE SENIOR CARD PROJEC Supply-Greeting Cards Senior Board 210948 91 BRUGGEMAN,GERALD AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210396 90 BOTTS,MATTHEW Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210878 89 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210957 89 CHRISTY,PAUL AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210903 89 WILSON,KRIS Operating Supplies Summer Skill Development 210888 88 TOM'S WINDOW CLEANING Janitor Service-General Bldg Den Bldg.-CAM 210428 88 DELEGARD TOOL CO Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211226 86 FAGNANT,SUSAN Instructor Service Outdoor Center 210972 86 DIETLIN,LEO AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210460 85 GANGOPADHYAY,SUNITA Deposits Community Center Admin 210723 85 BUSSE,HOLLY Tuition Reimbursement/School Fitness Classes 211202 84 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Office Supplies Customer Service 210554 83 OEHRIG,ODEAN Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211327 83 STEWART TITLE AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210932 82 BANBURY,TERRY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210601 82 SHAWD,MATT Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210703 81 AT&T MOBILITY Pager&Cell Phone Water System Maintenance 210631 81 TEMP,JEFFERY L Other Contracted Services Volleyball 210496 80 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO Repair&Maint. Supplies Park Maintenance 211073 79 MOTOROLA Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 211056 78 MARSH COVE LLC Deposits Escrow 211050 78 LIBERTY TIRE RECYCLING-MN Waste Disposal Fleet Operating 210646 77 UPS Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 210775 77 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENAN Cleaning Supplies Outdoor Center Facilities 210570 76 PRIORITY COURIER EXPERTS Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 4259 75 VANCO SERVICES Miscellaneous Community Center Admin 210491 75 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF A Dues&Subscriptions Fire Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210800 75 JOHNSON,MARTHA Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 211058 75 MCCORKELL,MARK AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211067 75 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT Software Maintenance IT Operating 210818 75 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 210422 74 CROWN MARKING INC Office Supplies Administration 210795 74 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO Repair&Maint. Supplies Park Maintenance 211054 74 MACKEN,DARCEY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210560 74 PETERSON,ROBERT Tuition Reimbursement/School Water Treatment Plant 210618 73 STAR TRIBUNE MEDIA COMPANY LLC Dues&Subscriptions Utility Operations-General 210763 73 G&K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL Other Rentals Park Maintenance 210399 72 BRYANT,CHRYS Deposits Community Center Admin 210730 72 CHEMSEARCH Supplies-HVAC City Hall-CAM 210544 72 MURPHY,TRACY Deposits Community Center Admin 210936 71 BECKER,KATIE Mileage&Parking Playgrounds 210416 69 CONBOY,KEVIN Landscape Materials/Supp Street Maintenance 210700 68 ARNDT,DALE Small Tools Fleet Operating 210620 68 STEVENSON,ANDREW Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 211089 68 OLSEN COMPANIES Equipment Repair&Maint Street Maintenance 211044 68 KROENING,TONY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210506 68 KINDERMUSIK WITH KIM Instructor Service CC-Arts&Drama Programs 211232 66 GARTON,EVERETT Operating Supplies Tennis 211086 66 NUCO2 INC Supplies-Pool Pool Maintenance 211005 65 GRIFFIN,HARRIET M AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210459 64 FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC Telephone Round Lake 211259 64 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES/LESCO Seal Coating Street Maintenance 210837 64 PASSPORT BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Prairie Village Liquor Store 211208 63 DAVANNI'S PIZZA Merchandise for Resale Concessions 210993 63 GARTON,EVERETT Mileage&Parking Tennis 211093 62 PHAM,JUSTIN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211127 62 SPRINT Telephone Engineering 210402 62 BUTE,SAM Deposits Community Center Admin 210641 61 TWIN CITY SEED CO Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 210393 60 BISCHOFF,CARLOTTA Deposits Community Center Admin 210395 60 BORGMAN,PAM Deposits Community Center Admin 210681 60 ZOU,LIJUAN Deposits Community Center Admin 210591 60 ROSS,MARINA AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210373 59 ALLEN,LAURA Deposits Community Center Admin 210535 59 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS Printing Police 211148 57 WALKER,MARK AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211164 57 YANG,KUN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210887 57 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance 211286 57 MORRILL,LISA Operating Supplies Inspections-Administration 210377 56 ANDERSON LAKES ANIMAL HOSPITAL Other Contracted Services Animal Control 210551 56 NORTON,NICHOLAS Other Contracted Services Teen Programs 210613 56 SPIRIT FINANCIAL CAPITAL MGMT AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210717 55 BOYER TRUCKS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210577 54 RAPID GLASS A QUALITY GLASS CO Supplies-General Bldg Park Shelters 210658 54 WEBER,ANNETTE Deposits Community Center Admin 211279 54 MIDWEST ROOFING SIDING&WINDO Cash Over/Short General Fund 210978 53 DUNCAN,JAMES AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210955 52 CHOLES,DIANA AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211075 52 MUMTAZ,MINU AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210974 52 DMX MUSIC Other Contracted Services Prairie Village Liquor Store 210976 52 DMX MUSIC Other Contracted Services Prairie Village Liquor Store 210764 51 GARTON,EVERETT Mileage&Parking Tennis 210990 51 FRANCIS,EVERETT AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210969 51 DEIGNAN,JOE&MEGAN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210365 50 SCHEDIN,JAMES C. Deposits Escrow 211152 49 WILSONS NURSERY INC Grounds Maintenance Senior Board 210756 49 FAGNANT,SUSAN Instructor Service Outdoor Center 210553 48 NUCO2 INC Supplies-Pool Pool Maintenance 210639 48 TRUSIGHT Other Contracted Services Organizational Services 211100 48 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Cleaning Supplies Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 210786 48 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC Operating Supplies Water Treatment Plant 211043 48 KRISPY KREME AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210448 46 FAGNANT,SUSAN Instructor Service Outdoor Center 210940 46 BERGLUND,LYNNEA AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210458 46 FRIEL,HEIDI Deposits Community Center Admin 210651 46 VANCE,GUY Deposits Community Center Admin 210781 46 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS Other Contracted Services Engineering 210424 45 D&D INSTRUMENTS Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210964 45 CREST,MICHAEL AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210928 45 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINES Clothing&Uniforms Day Care 210944 45 BONSALL,BRIAN&JACKIE AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211171 44 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Landscape Materials/Supp Street Maintenance 211111 43 SCHAEFER,CHARLES AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211037 42 JOHNSON,TASMAN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211046 42 LEBBEN,MICHAEL AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210842 42 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 210436 41 DURAND,MARY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211324 41 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 211026 41 J H LARSON COMPANY Supplies-Electrical City Hall-CAM 210394 40 BLOMQUIST,RENAE Deposits Community Center Admin 210415 40 COFFMAN,WILLIAM&CAROL Deposits Community Center Admin 210592 40 SANDEEN,REBEKA&JAYSON Deposits Community Center Admin 210594 40 SARLES,DONALD&KATHLEEN Deposits Community Center Admin 210939 40 BENTZ,MELBA AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210970 40 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Licenses&Taxes Park Maintenance 210985 40 FAGNANT,SUSAN Instructor Service Outdoor Center 211227 37 FASTENAL COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211203 37 CROWN MARKING INC Office Supplies Administration 210968 36 DECHERY,LAURENT AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210757 35 FASTENAL COMPANY Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210429 35 DICOSTANZO,ALFREDO Deposits Community Center Admin 210718 35 BRADSHER,SUE Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210863 35 SEELYE Equipment Repair&Maint Water Treatment Plant 211292 35 PASSPORT BEVERAGE Misc Taxable Den Road Liquor Store 211268 34 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 210391 34 BERTELSON TOTAL OFFICE SOLUTIO Office Supplies Utility Operations-General 210732 34 CHRISTENSEN,MARGE Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210789 34 IVERSON,MARGARET Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210806 34 LEVI-MCLOUDEN,GAYLE Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210816 34 MCCARTHY,BOB Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210463 34 GINA MARIAS INC Operating Supplies Reserves 211145 33 VIVAS,LEONARDO AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211107 32 REYNOLDS,RICHARD AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210977 32 DUMONCEAUX,GREGORY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210992 32 FUGLESTEN,LARRY AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211065 31 MILIO'S SANDWICHES Merchandise for Resale Concessions 210927 31 ALMANUN,SHAMIN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211072 31 MORAN,JASON&JENNIFER AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210724 31 CAMPBELL KNUTSON,P.A. Legal WAFTA 211143 30 VEZZETTI,EUGENE AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211015 30 HENDRICKS,DENISE AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210846 28 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance 211231 27 GARELICK STEEL CO INC Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 210933 27 BARON,SCOTT AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210926 26 ALLEN,WILLA AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211198 26 CERIDIAN Ceridian IT Operating 210999 26 GRANDY,JANICE AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210931 25 AT&T MOBILITY Pager&Cell Phone Park Maintenance 211039 25 KILPATRICK,JILL AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210791 25 JAFER,IMRAN Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 211201 25 COMCAST Operating Supplies Fire 210400 24 BURNETT KARLA Deposits Community Center Admin 211040 23 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC Supplies-General Bldg Fitness/Conference-Cmty Ctr 211052 21 LUND,JAMES AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210707 21 BATTERIES PLUS Small Tools Facilities Staff 211025 21 IVESTER,DAVID AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211126 20 SPALDING,JENNIFER AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210372 20 ALDRITT,JACKIE Deposits Community Center Admin 210438 20 EDLING,CYNTHIA Deposits Community Center Admin 210449 20 FALTINSON,JULILE Deposits Community Center Admin 210485 20 HOESCHEN,SHEILA Deposits Community Center Admin 210508 20 KRENIK,KAREN Deposits Community Center Admin 210509 20 KUHLMAN,BARBARA Deposits Community Center Admin 210511 20 LACERTE,YVES Deposits Community Center Admin 210513 20 LARSON,DOROTHY Deposits Community Center Admin 210529 20 MESHBESHER,MARLEE Deposits Community Center Admin 210548 20 NEUERBURG,TAMARA Deposits Community Center Admin 210557 20 PARKER,ALLAN Deposits Community Center Admin 210561 20 PHAM,TRUNG Deposits Community Center Admin 210571 20 PROCTOR,MILDRED Deposits Community Center Admin 210589 20 ROONEY,AUDREY Deposits Community Center Admin 210593 20 SANDVICK,DIANNE Deposits Community Center Admin 210595 20 SCHAAF,GEORGE Deposits Community Center Admin 210602 20 SHEN,XIAOJAN Deposits Community Center Admin 210619 20 STEELE,YVONNE Deposits Community Center Admin 210640 20 TSVETKOV,PAVLINA Deposits Community Center Admin 210659 20 WESTERGAARD,MARGIE Deposits Community Center Admin Check# Amount Vendor/Explanation Account Description Business Unit Explanation 210668 20 WOITTE,MARY Deposits Community Center Admin 210669 20 WOOD,KATHY Deposits Community Center Admin 210670 20 WOOLF,REBECCA Deposits Community Center Admin 211017 20 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Licenses&Taxes Customer Service 210430 20 DIETRICH,KATHRYN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211153 19 WINDRAM,THOMAS AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211066 19 MINN OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECH Other Contracted Services Police 211027 18 JANETKHAM,NEMAT AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211252 17 IND SCHOOL DIST 272 Other Rentals Community Band 211140 16 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Clothing&Uniforms Animal Control 210735 16 COMCAST Other Contracted Services Police 210501 15 JOHNSON,PAUL Deposits Community Center Admin 210643 15 UHLER,KATHERINE Deposits Community Center Admin 210829 14 MURRAY,CHERYL Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 211120 14 SHUCK,KARLA AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210555 13 OPHOVEN SAW SERVICE Equipment Repair&Maint Senior Center Admin 211049 12 LEWIS,GREG AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210852 12 PRIORITY COURIER EXPERTS Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 210442 11 ENGEL,JAN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211085 10 NUBSON,RICHARD AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210455 10 FISCHER,MARLENE Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210814 10 MARQUARDT,ESTHER Accounts Receivable Community Center Admin 210918 10 DEVERY,NATHAN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210954 10 CHARLES,KAREN AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 211112 10 SCHARBER&SONS Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 211070 9 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP Electric Riley Creek Woods 210451 9 FASTSIGNS Operating Supplies Fitness Center 4262 8 VANCO SERVICES Bank and Service Charges Sewer Utility-General 211048 8 LESER,CHRISTOPHER AR Utility Water Enterprise Fund 210689 6 ABSOLUTE MECHANICAL Cash Over/Short General Fund 210474 6 HANSON,SHANNON Deposits Community Center Admin 4263 6 VANCO SERVICES Bank and Service Charges Sewer Utility-General 210892 4 UPS Postage Water Metering 211341 1 UPS Postage Fire 6,982,639 Grand Total City of Eden Prairie Council Check Summary 8/16/2011 Division Amount Division General 98,954 315 Economic Development 100 City Manager 1,215 502 Park Development 101 Legislative 7,528 509 CIP Fund 102 Legal Counsel 30,772 512 CIP Trails 110 City Clerk 638 513 CIP Pavement Management 111 Customer Service 15,000 520 Parks Referendum 112 Human Resources 95 521 Trails Referendum 113 Communications 18,744 522 Improvement Projects 2006 114 Benefits&Training 9,610 526 Transportation Fund 130 Assessing 420 Total Capital Project Funds 131 Finance 1,595 132 Housing and Community Services 20,817 601 Prairie Village Liquor 133 Planning 8 602 Den Road Liquor 136 Public Safety Communications 10,155 603 Prairie View Liquor 137 Economic Development 159 605 Den Road Building 138 Community Development Admin. 236 701 Water Fund 150 Park Administration 2,916 702 Sewer Fund 151 Park Maintenance 59,307 703 Storm Drainage Fund 152 Parks Capital Outlay 360 Total Enterprise Funds 153 Organized Athletics 17,076 154 Community Center 25,422 316 WAFTA 155 Beaches 1,617 803 Escrow Fund 156 Youth Programs 16,297 809 Investment Fund 157 Special Events 33,109 Total Agency Funds 158 Senior Center 3,223 159 Recreation Administration 6,754 807 Benefits Fund 160 Therapeutic Recreation 688 811 Property Insurance 161 Oak Point Pool 4,702 812 Fleet Internal Service 162 Arts 16,044 813 IT Internal Service 163 Outdoor Center 5,039 814 Facilities Capital ISF 167 CC-Youth Programs 293 815 Facilites Operating ISF 168 Arts Center 5,943 816 Facilites City Center ISF 169 SC-Therapeutic Recreation 61 817 Facilites Comm.Center ISF 171 AC-Therapeutic Recreation 240 Total Internal Service Funds 180 Police 21,401 183 Emergency Preparedness 1,255 Report Total 184 Fire 27,954 186 Inspections 1,391 200 Engineering 27,211 201 Street Maintenance 1,294,207 202 Street Lighting 78,540 Total General Funds 1,866,996 301 CDBG 17,433 303 Cemetary Operation 714 304 Senior Board 1,293 308 E-911 33,569 312 Recycle Rebate 1,444 Total Special Revenue Funds 54,453 418 HRA 2002A Lease Revenue Bonds 17,925 421 2003A Park Bonds Refunding 6,114 423 2003C Open Space Bonds 10,420 427 2005 G.O.IMPR BONDS 350 429 G.O.Improvement Bonds 2005C 101,573 430 G.O.Improvement Bonds 2006A 121,731 431 G.O.Improvement Bonds 2006B 82,285 432 G.O.Improvement Bonds 2006C 4,994 433 2007A Facility Lease-3rd Rink 32,185 Total Debt Service Funds 377,576 Amount 1,345,121 25,323 6,155 16,303 68,654 2,556 12,068 1,342 5,477 1,482,999 263,946 375,031 250,560 1,701 212,061 466,380 38,898 1,608,577 281 18,297 6,515 25,093 655,294 205,858 213,498 52,068 197,089 63,855 102,185 77,098 1,566,945 6,982,639 City of Eden Prairie Purchasing Card Payment Report 7/20/2011 Payment Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit 12 US-4"CPLG Fitting HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance 31 US-Direct Bury Splices INVISIBLE FENCE CO OF MN Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance -1,728 US-Credit from Fraud COMP-VIEW Deposits Escrow 11 US-Picra Path by Pavillion MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 12 US-Tool Replacement MENARDS Small Tools Park Maintenance 6 US-Soccer Goals MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 43 US-Sign Holders MAVERICK MENUS Operating Supplies Prairie Village Liquor Store 43 US-Sign Holders MAVERICK MENUS Operating Supplies Den Road Liquor Store 43 US-Sign Holders MAVERICK MENUS Operating Supplies Prairie View Liquor Store 8 US-Saw Training COOPER'S COUNTRY MARKET Operating Supplies Senior Center Admin 3 US-Kitchen Supplies DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies Senior Board 28 US-Kitchen Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Senior Center Admin 664 US-Hangers-Wall Art Display WALKER DISPLAY INCORPORATED Capital Under$10,000 Senior Board 36 US-Karoke Machine RADIOSHACK Operating Supplies Senior Center Admin 37 US-Employee Awards EXECUTIVE OCEAN Employee Award Organizational Services -135 US-Credit BAKERS SQUARE Special Event Fees Senior Center Programs 18 US-Woodshop Equipment MENARDS Equipment Repair&Maint Senior Center Admin 19 US-Garden Party RAINBOW FOODS INC. Special Event Fees Senior Board 77 US-Red Hat Trip BAKERS SQUARE Special Event Fees Red Hat 10 US-Garden Party WALGREEN'S#5080 Special Event Fees Senior Board 66 US-Card Supplies OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Operating Supplies Senior Board 47 US-Garden Party CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Special Event Fees Senior Board 81 US-Staff Meeting GINA MARIAS INC Miscellaneous Senior Center Admin 38 US-Staff Meeting KOWALSKI'S MARKET Miscellaneous Senior Center Admin 38 US-Staplers-4th of July MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 85 US-Sump Vactor Truck NORTHERN TOOL&EQUIPMENT Small Tools Sewer System Maintenance 76 US-Air Rachet,truck#733 NAPA AUTO PARTS Small Tools Sewer System Maintenance 11 US-Lumber for Archery MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 63 US-Paint for Ballfields MENARDS Operating Supplies Park Maintenance 6 US-Screws for Archery HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 19 US-4"x 2" MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance -12 US-4"x 2" MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer System Maintenance 36 US-Conference MARRIOTT HOTELS Travel Expense City Council 221 US-Aeration Propeller Repair NORTH SHORE MARINA Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 160 US-Training PLT SERVICES Licenses,Permits,Taxes Park Maintenance 160 US-Training PLT SERVICES Licenses,Permits,Taxes Park Maintenance 200 US-Renewal FIREHOUSE Dues&Subscriptions Fire 122 US-Emerg.Awareness Lunch CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Operating Supplies Fire 144 US-Recruit Interviews PANERA BREAD Operating Supplies Fire 25 US-Stand By Crew ERBERT&GERBERT'S Operating Supplies Fire 70 US-Fleet Tool Repair THOMAS TOOL&SUPPLY Equipment Repair&Maint Fleet Operating 14 US-Street Supplies MENARDS Operating Supplies Street Maintenance 16 US-Street Supplies MENARDS Operating Supplies Street Maintenance -64 US-Return case BEST BUY Operating Supplies Fire 32 US-Sherburne co cheifs Assoc FEDEX Operating Supplies Fire Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit 13 US-Parking NORTHSTAR RAMP Operating Supplies Fire 400 US-ICMA Conference ICMA Conference Expense Administration 59 US-Batteries for Investigation MENARDS Operating Supplies Police 1,650 US-Forensic Software renewal SUSTEEN INC Miscellaneous IT Operating 840 US-Forensic Software ACCESSDATA CORP Miscellaneous IT Operating -8 US-Refund HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 23 US-Lk Fountain HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 15 US-Lk Fountain HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 18 US-Fountain-Purgatory HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 72 US-8Guage Bare Ground HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Improvements to Land Capital Outlay Parks 288 US-Baseline MENARDS Improvements to Land Capital Outlay Parks 26 US-Irrigation-Rainclicks MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 26 US-Irrigation-Rainclicks MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 3 US-Irrigation Repair SUPERAMERICA Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 11 US-Round Lake Building HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Repair&Maint.Supplies Park Maintenance 53 US-Dirt AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance -25 US-Jack Hammer CROWN RENTAL Other Rentals Water Treatment Plant 96 US-Jack Hammer CROWN RENTAL Other Rentals Water Treatment Plant 501 US-Sensor,Cable Press PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS INC Equipment Parts Water Enterprise Fund 375 US-Lawnmower SEARS EDEN PRAIRIE Grounds Maintenance Utility Operations-General 24 US-Hammer Drill Rental CROWN RENTAL Other Rentals Water Treatment Plant 4 US-Parking for Meeting MILL QUARTER MUNICIPAL RAMP Mileage&Parking Community Development Admin. 385 US-Tire Sealant ULTRASEAL INTERNATIONAL INC Equipment Parts Fleet Operating 331 US-Safety Cap XVD CORPORATION Office Supplies Customer Service 95 US-Membership Renewal TWIN CITIES HUMAN RESOURCES AS Conference Expense Human Resources 110 US-Accreditation Program IABC Dues&Subscriptions Communications 320 US-Accreditation Program IABC Dues&Subscriptions Communications 79 US-Fire Residents SPRINGHILL SUITES ASHBURN DULL Deposits Escrow -79 US-Refund SPRINGHILL SUITES ASHBURN DULL Deposits Escrow 65 US-Homeowner Kits OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Operating Supplies Fire 539 US-Tools MENARDS Small Tools Fire 2,227 US-May Bldg Surcharge DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Building Surcharge General Fund 852 US-May Bldg Surcharge DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Mechanical Surcharge General Fund 802 US-May Bldg Surcharge DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Plumbing Surcharge General Fund -78 US-May Bldg Surcharge DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY Other Revenue General Fund 40 US-UB Online Processing PAYPAL INC Bank and Service Charges Utility Operations-General 40 US-UB Recurring Credit Cards PAYPAL INC Bank and Service Charges Utility Operations-General 20 US-E-Permit Web Security PAYPAL INC Equipment Repair&Maint IT Operating 93 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 186 US-Label Tape HAWK LABELING SYSTEMS Operating Supplies Community Center Admin 83 US-Café Food RAINBOW FOODS INC. Merchandise for Resale Concessions 49 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 8 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 20 US-Café Food CRUMB GOURMET DELI Merchandise for Resale Concessions 13 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 27 US-Café Food CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Merchandise for Resale Concessions 12 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 408 US-Café Supplies SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO Operating Supplies Concessions 20 US-Café Food RAINBOW FOODS INC. Merchandise for Resale Concessions Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit 228 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 84 US-Tupperware for Café TARGET Merchandise for Resale Concessions 21 US-Label Tape HAWK LABELING SYSTEMS Operating Supplies Community Center Admin 41 US-Café Food WALGREEN'S#5080 Merchandise for Resale Concessions 17 US-Café Food RAINBOW FOODS INC. Merchandise for Resale Concessions 54 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 30 US-Ice SHAMROCK GROUP,INC-ACE ICE Operating Supplies July 4th Celebration 48 US-Café Food RAINBOW FOODS INC. Merchandise for Resale Concessions 66 US-Café Food WALMART COMMUNITY Merchandise for Resale Concessions 159 US-License Renewal VUE LICENSING Licenses,Permits,Taxes Economic Development 38 US-SLUC Luncheon Mtg SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Miscellaneous City Council 38 US-SLUC Luncheon Mtg SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Miscellaneous Engineering 241 US-Council Workshop Food QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL Miscellaneous City Council 20 US-Council Workshop Food KOWALSKI'S MARKET Miscellaneous City Council 15 US-Frame for Proclamation OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Office Supplies Administration 425 US-LMC Conf-Ron Case DOUBLE TREE Travel Expense City Council 38 US-SLUC Luncheon Mtg SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION Miscellaneous Administration 60 US-Sunshine-Schuster's Bro BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT Deposits Escrow 22 US-Phone Charger VERIZON WIRELESS Repair&Maint.Supplies Utility Operations-General 1 US-Propane Torch Lighter WALGREEN'S#5080 Repair&Maint.Supplies Water System Maintenance 276 US-Vidoetap Footage BEST BUY Operating Supplies Recreation Admin 33 US-Lunch,Tour Woodshops PERKINS Miscellaneous Recreation Admin 39 US-Staff Lunch PIZZA LUCE Miscellaneous Recreation Admin 25 US-Meeting JJ'S COFFEE COMPANY&WINE BAR Miscellaneous Recreation Admin 81 US-Live Well Basket WALGREEN'S#5080 Operating Supplies Recreation Admin 48 US-Live Well Basket WALGREEN'S#5080 Operating Supplies Recreation Admin 73 US-CB Trailer Supplies NORTHERN TOOL&EQUIPMENT Repair&Maint.Supplies Storm Drainage 175 US-Wood,718&Bobcat Trl SIWEK LUMBER&MILLWORK INC Repair&Maint.Supplies Storm Drainage 38 US-Signal Tools HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Equipment Repair&Maint Traffic Signals 33 US-Rental Truck SUPERAMERICA Equipment Repair&Maint Traffic Signals 10 US-Sirens SUPERAMERICA Equipment Repair&Maint Traffic Signals 11 US-Landscape AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 75 US-Sod AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 268 US-Dirt AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Asphalt Overlay Street Maintenance 21 US-Supper,Hach Class LACASITA Tuition Reimbursement/School Water Treatment Plant 38 US-Lunch,Hach class HOLIDAY INN Tuition Reimbursement/School Water Treatment Plant 95 US-Hach Class HOLIDAY INN Tuition Reimbursement/School Water Treatment Plant 42 US-Shipping,Full Year Fee GEMPLERS Postage Water Treatment Plant 243 US-Saw Mill Repairs,Injectors SEAL BOSS CORP Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer Capital 51 US-Flower Bed Maint. MENARDS Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 103 US-Flower Bed Maint. MENARDS Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 31 US-Flower Bed Maint. MENARDS Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 99 US-Hyd Domp Repair-491 FELLING TRAILERS Equipment Repair&Maint Park Maintenance 6 US-Mulch MENARDS Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 21 US-Plant Material-Senior Cente MARSHALL'S GARDENS Landscape Materials/Supp Park Maintenance 43 US-Certificates GEOGRAPHICS.COM Operating Supplies Safety Camp 179 US-Suspender Trial ATLAS LBE Clothing&Uniforms Police 280 US-Saw Mill Repairs,Injectors OPTIONS PLUS Repair&Maint.Supplies General Fund 108 US-Kennel Cover HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Canine Supplies Police Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit 210 US-Suspender Trial BACKDEFENSESYSTEMS.COM Clothing&Uniforms Police 10 US-Weed Sprayer LANO EQUIPMENT OF NORWOOD Operating Supplies Street Maintenance 149 US-Vases for Ikebanna Class SAMADHI CUSHIONS Operating Supplies Arts Center 33 US-Birthday Party Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center 454 US-Sandbags for tents KD KANOPY Operating Supplies Recreation Admin 32 US-Canvas for Summer Class MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center 6 US-Paper Plates for Camp WALGREEN'S#5080 Operating Supplies Arts Center 89 US-Blanket DELPHI Operating Supplies Arts Center 8 US-Clay for Art Camp MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center 33 US-Volunteer Software VOLGISTICS Other Contracted Services General Fund 75 US-Toner for Art Center Printe OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Operating Supplies Arts Center 20 US-Map Gas for Camp HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Arts Center 538 US-Scripts for One Acts PLAYSCRIPTS,INC Operating Supplies Theatre Initiative 44 US-Scripts for One Acts DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE INC Operating Supplies Theatre Initiative 245 US-License for One Acts DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE INC Licenses,Permits,Taxes Theatre Initiative 8 US-Art Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Arts Center 489 US-Guard Board ADOLPH KIEFER&ASSOCIATES Clothing&Uniforms Oak Point Operations 145 US-CPR Certification Supplies THE RED CROSS STORE Operating Supplies Pool Lessons 95 US-B-Day Party Supplies ORIENTAL TRADING Operating Supplies Birthday Parties 44 US-B-Day Party Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Birthday Parties 1,008 US-Bench TEAK WICKER AND MORE Capital Under$10,000 General Fund 872 US-Membership Card Supplies ID WHOLESALER Video&Photo Supplies Community Center Admin 354 US-Basketball Supplies SPORT SUPPLY GROUP Recreation Supplies Gymnasium(CC) 15 US-Block for Golden Ridge INNOVATIVE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY IN Landscape Materials/Supp Street Maintenance 23 US-Sod-Ontario Blvd AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Landscape Materials/Supp Street Maintenance 21 US-Critter Supplies PETCO Operating Supplies Outdoor Center 50 US-Outdoor Center Tools MENARDS Small Tools Outdoor Center 70 US-Program Trip RECREATION.GOV Program Trips Outdoor Center 28 US-Critter Supplies PETCO Operating Supplies Outdoor Center 193 US-Operating Supplies MILLS FLEET FARM Operating Supplies Outdoor Center 56 US-Program Trip JEFFERS PETROGLYPHS Program Trips Outdoor Center 6 US-Program Trip PIPESTONE Program Trips Outdoor Center 50 US-Program Trip SHELL OIL Program Trips Outdoor Center 104 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 104 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 104 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 104 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 110 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 104 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 104 US-Program Trip CROSSINGS BY GRANDSTAY INN&S Program Trips Outdoor Center 29 US-Camera Parts,Outdoor Cente SEARS EDEN PRAIRIE Equipment Repair&Maint Public Safety Communications 41 US-Personal Use in Error GREEN MILL Deposits Escrow 130 US-Conference PAYPAL INC Conference Expense Police 26 US-Playground Camp TARGET Operating Supplies Youth Programs Admin 708 US-Tennis Equipment MICHAEL LYNNE'S TENNIS SHOP Recreation Supplies Tennis 202 US-Tennis Equipment WALMART COMMUNITY Recreation Supplies Tennis 123 US-Ultimate Frisbee Camp GOPHER Recreation Supplies Summer Skill Development 85 US-Plyg Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Playgrounds 105 US-USTA Coaches Workshop EDINA,CITY OF Operating Supplies Tennis Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit 99 US-Playground Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies Playgrounds 112 US-Team Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 16 US-Team Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 43 US-Playground Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies Playgrounds 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 80 US-Tennis Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 104 US-Tennis Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 142 US-Tennis Equipment MICHAEL LYNNE'S TENNIS SHOP Recreation Supplies Tennis 50 US-Safety Camp Speaker Gifts TARGET Operating Supplies Safety Camp 44 US-Program Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Youth Programs Admin 4 US-Safety Camp WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Safety Camp 600 US-Tennis Equipment TENNIS WAREHOUSE Operating Supplies Tennis 13 US-Art Supplies MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Youth Programs Admin 91 US-Team Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 111 US-Team Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 111 US-Team Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 535 US-Tennis Tickets MINNESOTA TWINS Special Event Fees Special Events&Trips 121 US-Team Registration USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 51 US-Tennis Uniform Equipment TENNIS WAREHOUSE Recreation Supplies Tennis 167 US-July 4th Bingo Prizes DOLLAR TREE STORES,INC. Operating Supplies July 4th Celebration 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 19 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 27 US-Safety Camp Lunch Supplies CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE Operating Supplies Safety Camp 24 US-Tennis Membership USTA-NORTHERN SECTION Operating Supplies Tennis 151 US-Safety Camp Lunch MCDONALDS Operating Supplies Safety Camp 570 US-Safety Camp Lunch DAVANNI'S PIZZA Operating Supplies Safety Camp 26 US-Playground Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Playgrounds 13 US-Rocking @ Riley Food GINA MARIAS INC Operating Supplies Riley-Jacques Barn Amount Explanation Vendor Account Description Business Unit 23 US-Schools Out Party Supplies RAINBOW FOODS INC. Operating Supplies SC-Saturday Night Out 39 US-Rocking @ Riley Supplies RAINBOW FOODS INC. Operating Supplies Riley-Jacques Barn 38 US-Schools Out Party Supplies PARTY CITY Operating Supplies SC-Saturday Night Out 14 US-Supplies for Teen Camps TARGET Operating Supplies Therapeutic Rec Admin 376 US-Food for Staff Meeting DAVANNI'S PIZZA Operating Supplies Playgrounds 67 US-Supplies for Teen Camps SPORTS AUTHORITY Recreation Supplies Accessibility 17 US-Camp Supplies TARGET Operating Supplies New Adaptive 8 US-Camp Paddle Boating CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Special Event Fees New Adaptive 8 US-Camp Paddle Boating CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Special Event Fees New Adaptive 8 US-Camp Paddle Boating CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Special Event Fees New Adaptive 135 US-Camp Activities FRIENDSHIP VENTURES Special Event Fees New Adaptive 60 US-Camp Activities SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY CENTER Special Event Fees New Adaptive 102 US-Camp Zoo Outing MINNESOTA ZOO Special Event Fees New Adaptive 880 US-Uniforms for Staff SWIMOUTLET.COM Clothing&Uniforms Pool Operations 48 US-Lake Riley Supplies GANDER MOUNTAIN Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach -48 US-Return Hangers TARGET Operating Supplies Fitness Classes 58 US-Riley Sign Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach 120 US-Oak Point Mezzanine Chairs HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Pool Operations 150 US-Chairs for Oak Point HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Operating Supplies Oak Point Operations 269 US-Uniforms for Staff SWIMOUTLET.COM Clothing&Uniforms Oak Point Operations 23 US-B-day MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Specialty Fitness Programs 50 US-Instructor CEC Training NETA Tuition Reimbursement/School Fitness Classes 94 US-Batteries for Riley WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach 27 US-Frames for B-Day Party MICHAELS-THE ARTS&CRAFTS S Operating Supplies Birthday Parties 11 US-Lake Riley Beach Supplies WALMART COMMUNITY Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach 92 US-CPR-PR Books STAYWELL Licenses,Permits,Taxes Pool Lessons 219 US-Batteries for Studio A&B FULL SOURCE LLC Operating Supplies Fitness Classes 250 US-Monthly Licensing Fees SCW FITNESS Licenses,Permits,Taxes Fitness Classes 71 US-Lake Riley 4th Event TARGET Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach 5 US-Ice for Riley Beach SUPERAMERICA Operating Supplies Riley Lake Beach 43 US-Training Presentation Mater BEST BUY Training Supplies Police 107 US-Negotiator Equipment GALLS INC Operating Supplies Police 1,052 US-Night Vision Repair ITT NIGHT VISION Equipment Repair&Maint General Fund 80 US-Training Class ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICE Tuition Reimbursement/School Police 57 US-Team Building Lunch GINA MARIAS INC Miscellaneous IT Operating 262 US-Roto-Hammer TRADE TOOLS INC Small Tools Sewer System Maintenance 115 US-Heavy Adhesive MENARDS Repair&Maint.Supplies Sewer Capital 32,552 Report Total OFFICE OF THE FIRE CHIEF I August 16, 2011 , ; � ; Captain Fred Haffner Letter of Recognition PRAI RI E LIVE•'.NARK•DRFAAd In March of 1967, thirty men from Eden Prairie together created the Eden Prairie Fire Department and began a tradition of excellence that endures today. These men will forever be remembered as the "Charter Members" of the Eden Prairie Fire Department. The Charter Members had the vision and the inspiration to create something from nothing, to step into the relative unknown and create a commitment to generations of future Eden Prairie residents and firefighters. Fred Haffner was an Eden Prairie Fire Department Charter Member. Fred was born in Switzerland and immigrated to America in 1958. During Fred's career, he served first as a firefighter and then as Captain of Squad Two. Fred retired after 18 years of dedicated service in 1985. Fred was a person of integrity and dedication to his family, his career and the role he played with the Eden Prairie Fire Department. Sadly, Fred passed away on July 21, 2011, from heart failure. The City of Eden Prairie, its residents and the City Council owe a debt of gratitude to Fred Haffner and all of the Charter Members of the Eden Prairie Fire Department for their leadership and dedication. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Report of the Parks and Recreation Director August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Jay Lotthammer, Director, Donation to the Community Theater XIII. D.1. Parks and Recreation Program Motion: Move to: Accept the anonymous donation of$1,000 to be used by the Eden Prairie Players for the purchase of equipment or supplies needed to enhance the theater program. Synopsis Recently, the director of the children's show "The Trial of Goldilocks"was approached by one of the children in the show. She handed an envelope to the director and went on to rehearse the show. Later the director opened the envelope and to her surprise the child's parents had made a generous donation to the Eden Prairie Players. Last year the same family made a donation of $500 that was used to repair and add to the theater curtains at the barn. Attachments Copy of Check • 107:16 17-1/910 5931' • 3972792362 Date Pay to the ��� �/ n ��� / /� Order of C .; /;,w.CG� Q/ i I i �rt� r 'a. { 'i �t I; t � il�-o- �r ns��i 1F h!l ;i .� ICI I. c gq��z03: .�NeIIf r oDan IAA i� {� I - 1 ,l ,?� I ? : r5 N- h i r` /. WELLS 9 k i`n t I r to 1 1 I I'ARGO Mlnnesoh I'4 i.. �s,} m,7 . ` 'e I .t . i_� I I iN I I f , ` 1�'3 r I� 1 1,15 wofar9acom. 6. rn„ s vp s1 � 1,7`,'(;r ,41 S/ €� al , ..''';:- I ail r_- i1i c ,I , t I(�1:2�1f ram, � � +i� gyp, • � fff CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Report of the Parks and Recreation Director August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Jay Lotthammer, Director, Donation to Parks and Recreation for Park XIII. D. 2. Parks and Recreation Amenities Requested Action Move to: Accept the anonymous donation of$2,000 to be used to replace and upgrade the drinking fountain at the Staring Lake Park—West Parking Lot. Synopsis Parks and Recreation staff were recently contacted by a person who grew up in Eden Prairie and expressed an appreciation for the experiences that he and his friends were able to have in the parks and recreation programs while growing up. He wanted to express his appreciation by making a donation towards parks or programs and wanted to remain anonymous. He did not want to specify further where the money went,but asked that staff make the decision on his behalf. During the conversation he mentioned that he was a cross-country runner in high school and made extensive use of the trail system. Staff has identified the drinking fountain at the Staring Lake -west park lot as needing replacement. The recommendation is to use this money in order to fund the replacement and upgrade to a fountain that separates the people and dog drinking area and allows for filling water bottles and jugs. A similar fountain was installed near the Cummins Grill House approximately two years ago and has received a great deal of positive feedback from park visitors. Copied from e-mail -Please accept this donation of$2000.00 to be used for the enhancement of park amenities,facilities or program areas. Having grown up in Eden Prairie, I recognize the benefits that the park system and the programs that are offered have on the residents of the City of Eden Prairie. Looking back, my experiences in the parks and participation in the programs have greatly benefited me and many of the kids that I grew up with. Attachment Copy of Check 17-1/910 3796 0196096116 10 j G: Date • -rrordeoofe��Ti( 1�� !U �PAzl2 PLC= $ �000e, 1DO "C"wc ` ti�lcu� Ul •• � F �VI'LLS -Wells Farga BankN.A - - ; I'AHGO Mlnneson wellshigo.com _ _ s For PFt Q k s �+C CEATz o dJ �3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Director of Public Works August 16, 2011 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 11-5795 ITEM NO.: Robert Ellis Baker Road Lane Configuration Report XIII. E. 1. Public Works Requested Action Move to: Acknowledge Report Synopsis On August 4, 2011, at Forest Hills Elementary, City and County personnel presented an alternative lane configuration for Baker Road between Highway 62 and St. Andrews Drive. Approximately 60 citizens attended the meeting. A review of all comments received via open house comment cards,phone and e-mail showed 13 were in favor of the change while 50 were opposed. Roughly 7 were neutral on the matter. Due to the lack of public support for this alternative, staff recommends restriping the pavement in its current configuration once the surfacing improvements have been made. Background Information Baker Road between Highway 62 and St. Andrews Drive is currently striped as a four lane roadway. Hennepin County has scheduled a resurfacing project in this area. A traffic analysis demonstrated the potential to restripe this roadway for three vehicular lanes and bikeable shoulders. This resurfacing project presented an opportunity to review the existing lane configuration and make changes as desired by the public. Although staff recommends restriping the pavement in its current configuration we are acceptable to the County making future lane marking changes at Baker Road and Highway 62 to allow for a protect/permitted signal phasing operation. This would eliminate the current spilt phase timing and would reduce driver delay at the intersection Attachments • Public Comments • Traffic Study • PowerPoint Presentation Me-Rid 4to3lae(bisoi RgeI Slur y d Riii c Curets Open House Comment Sheets 1) Sue King- Leave Baker Road as is (4-lane) 2) Lisa Wood- There must be a turn lane for employees entering the back lot of F.H. near Cardinal Creek. 3) Steve Miller- Would like roadway to stay 4-lane. 4) Nancy Lenhart- Turning onto Baker Road from Sand Ridge Road; uses left lane and transitions over. (Additional comment via email) 5) Laura Phillips- Slowing down traffic is a plus, the plan would help with pedestrian and bike traffic safety. 6) Mark Engstrom- Likes the idea and that it promotes bike paths for commuters, racers, recreational adults and kids. 7) Grant Johnson- Oppose changes due to increased risk of accidents and delays at left turns, most of benefits to bike riders versus cars. 8) Sylvia Wiens- Opposes proposed plan because Baker Road is crowed enough without reducing lanes, and believes lane reduction would cause a traffic jam during rush hour. (Additional comment via phone) 9) John Aeve(?)- Opposes plan to change a roadway that works just fine the way it is. Believes am rush hour would cause road rage and frustration with reduced speed. 10) Jeff Seltult- Opposes plan to reduce Baker road to a 3-lane roadway. Access to side streets will be impacted negatively. 11) Justin Smith-Would like right hand turn lanes at Holley Road and Edenvale Road to allow traffic to flow uninterrupted by vehicles turning right, especially at peak hours. 12) Julianne Heanen- Likes overall plan and it will be good for walkers and bikers. 13) Roger Swigart- Believes reducing lane number would cause slow traffic and dangerous conditions in winter that are not present with 4-lane. Also entry from side roads would be dangerous. Baker Road Summary of Public Comments Page 2 of 6 14) Roberta& John Cvetnic- Oppose lane conversion on Baker Road, not able to exit onto Baker when Forest Hills School is in session. Have concerns about how they can move over to another lane when emergency vehicle is stopped with flashing lights. 15) Vern & Linda Faber- Oppose lane conversion, concerned about only two travel lanes. Believes that with only two travel lanes cars will not be able to avoid bikers on shoulder as much as with a 4-lane road. (Additional comment via email) 16) Carol Carraher-Pleased with plan, project will be a benefit for both drivers and pedestrians. Likes that it forces aggressive drivers to slow down or get on the freeway. Concerned about increased accidents in the winter. 17) Gordon Fraser-Health club- single lane heavy traffic- gridlock, crossing Baker then left turn(heavy traffic) Difficult. 18) Aruthur Halbardier- Overall an excellent plan. Safer access side streets turning left, safer access to school, and safer for pedestrians. 19) Pat Vagroli(?)-Does not approve of plan because there is too much traffic for a single lane in each direction. 20) Cindy Hewitt- Concerned about the number of lanes going from 4 to 3 and about police presence. Skeptical and scared about the change. 21) Ken & Jan Anderson—Approves of three lane idea but says more attention needs to be paid to the Edenvale intersection because it slopes and may be dangerous with winter conditions. 22) Lugene Peissig- Against conversion. Bikes do not belong on a major road. Too much traffic to funnel down to one lane each way. 23) Chris Takach- Disapproves of plan, during the winter the turn onto Baker from Promontory Drive, it is uphill and slippery. 24) Paul Wien- Opposed to proposed conversion. No passing would contribute to driver frustration and says there would be wasted space in implementing the bike lane. 25) Janelle Steinman- Concerns about increased traffic during school hours. Also, entrance into Cardinal Creek Road is dangerous especially in the winter. 26) Paul Cummings- Opposed to proposed conversion, does not see cost savings advantage as road is same size paved. Also, road will cause driver confusion and more accidents. 27) Richard& Ivanka Zdrahala- Opposed to proposed conversion. Concerned about turning from Cardinal Creek Road to Baker. Baker Road Summary of Public Comments Page 3 of 6 28) John Carlson- Opposed to proposed conversion. Says the conversion would create problems like left turn problems from side streets. 29) Anne Warfield-Against conversion, concerned about the center lane causing accidents. 30) Steve Badenoch- Opposed to conversion, main concern is getting onto Baker Road during peak traffic hours. 31) Roger Johnson-Approves of the conversion. 32) Amy Scott- Opposed to conversion, because of urban sprawl in Chaska, Chanhassen, etc, there will be more traffic and more lanes on Baker Road. Also concerned about getting onto Baker from side streets. 33) Howard Gilles- Opposed to conversion, it will create vehicle congestion at rush hour and in snow conditions. 34) Chris Siefferman- Opposes conversion, suggests to just re-stripe road lines, also recommends a turn lane off-set. 35) Glenn Schaufler- Opposes conversion, doesn't see reason to do the project. (Additional comment via phone) 36) Anne Prideaux- Opposes conversion, there are dangerous turns onto Baker from side streets especially from Cardinal Creek Road. (Additional comment via email) 37) Heidi Horsch- Opposes conversion, concerned about getting onto Baker from side streets especially in the winter. 38) Chris Nelson-As a biker approves on the conversion. (Additional comment via email) 39) Geraldine Beckmann- Opposes conversion. Green streets is the driver for this change. Statistics of bicycle or vehicles do not warrant a change. 40) Damon and Teri Ground- Oppose conversion. Minnesotans do not know how to use a shared turn lane and we are convinced that accidents would increase. Baker Road Summary of Public Comments Page 4 of 6 Email Comments 1) Anne Prideaux- Does not agree with the conversion. Getting on Baker Road at my side streets is already difficult, with the proposed changes it will only be worse. (Additional comment via open house comment sheet) 2) Peter and Lisa Hoeper- Would like Baker Road to remain as it is a very functional and appealing 4-lane Road. 3) Anne Warfield-Desire to keep Baker Road 4-lane. Concur with Hoeper email. 4) Brian Hansen- Concur with Hoeper email. Very concerned about safety of the new road if it were converted to 3 lanes. 5) Kaitlan Horsch- Opposes Conversion. Concerned with traffic impacts. 6) Carl Horsch- Concerned about the proposed plan to convert Baker from two lanes to one in order to accommodate a bike lane. Makes no sense to have a bike lane, for a limited length, on one of the busiest streets in Eden Prairie. 7) Louis Guertin- The reduction from four lanes to two, and the left turn lane, is a giant step in the wrong direction and is one of the most ignorant decisions I've seen in years. 8) Eric Vinson- There's a bike path running the entire length of the stretch form Valley View Rd to 62 on the east side, and a sidewalk on the west side. There is absolutely no reason that traffic lanes should be converted to allow for a bike lane. 9) Shaun Klinkhammer- Opposes project. Not enough bike users compared to vehicles. 10) Chris Nelson- Wants to confirm that Baker Road will be converted to 3-lanes with a shoulder for bike traffic. (Additional comment via open house comment sheet) 11) Nick Wollan-Would like to suggest adding a bike lane for the increased number of bicyclists riding on Baker Road. 12) Bob Phillips- This is a very welcome development. We always avoided family outings the forced us to ride or walk on the Baker Rd sidewalks. We considered it dangerous due to the lack of a buffer and the high speed of traffic. 13) Virgil Rolfsrud- Opposes project. Read project information and was unable to find any justification for it. Baker Road— Summary of Public Comments Page 5 of 6 14) Linda Faber- I know of no proposal that reduces lanes rather than increases lanes and justifies it by statistics. It can be a difficult drive in bad weather or good weather for that matter. (Additional comment via open house comment sheet). 15) Nancy Lenhart-Why are we taking the time to do this now vs.just repaving the way it is? I'm not sure why this is necessary for a few bicyclists vs. a majority of motorists and safety issues. (Additional comment via open house comment sheet). 16) Christine Stebner-What is the reason for converting Baker road from 4 lanes to 3. 17) Randy and Kathy Steen- Concerned that conversion will compromise flow of traffic, increase potential to speed, increase accidents and will drive down house value. 18) Phil Simon- Concerned how he will get in and out of his neighborhood. 19) Sandra Luker- I support what is being presented. I feel it will improve the safety of the road. 20) Kara Bancroft-Would like to support project. Despite Baker Road being a main bike access road for me, I typically avoid baker Road due to the lack of a shoulder. However, has great concern about 3-lane section continuing north of Pinnacle. 21) Pam Guttman- Concerned about lane changes. The change seems to be an unnecessary one, without an overwhelming relevant reason to do so. 22) John Zachman- The conversion from 4 to 3 lanes would create little value in facilitating left turns while dramatically increasing congestion as a result of slowdowns from the many right-turning vehicles. Phone Comments 1) Gary Stirrup- Questions why we are making conversion. After discussion understand rational for conversion but not supportive. 2) Vance Blanik-What is driving change? Traffic levels seem to warrant 4 lanes. If traffic is not being improved why change it. Stay with something that is proven. 3) Carol-After discussion was on fence about whether or not it was a good idea. Wanted to make sure that we talked to school. Baker Road— Summary of Public Comments Page 6 of 6 4) Steve Hansen-Would like to keep it 4-lanes. In peak hours 4-lanes will work better. 5) Connie Hytjan(Forest Hills Principal)- She was contacted by several parents informing her of project and expressing concern about how project will impact school traffic. She indicated that it is important that school busses are kept on schedule. 6) Lisa Toume-Had questions about project and concerns about traffic. After discussion seemed acceptable to project. 7) Weins- Concern about project. Not adamantly opposed(Additional comment via open house comment sheets) 8) Glen Schaufler-Discussed concerns and benefits of project. Indicated the he rides on sidewalk and trail and he seemed to oppose project. (Additional comment via open house comment sheet) 9) David Mesik- Concern that this is unnecessary spending. After discussion comment is to make sure we use our tax money wisely. 10) Laurie Lynch- Opposed to project. Bike trail is available for bikes and pedestrians. Need second through lane. 11) Tom Walters-Number of bikers is not an issue. 4-lane is preference but okay with whatever decision is made. 12) Tom Gray-Absolutely the most stupid thing he has ever heard. Why shut down two- lanes for bike lanes. 13) Carol Hudson(President of Cardinal Creek Homeowner's Association)- She was gathering comments from the association with mixed comments but their main concerns seemed to be expected delays on the side streets, eliminating passing opportunities on Baker Road, and concern that we are doing this to accommodate bikes and pedestrians while sacrificing vehicular traffic. 14) Al Hansen- Concerned with change. Thought the road should be widened if we want to add the center left turn lanes and that right turning vehicles will cause problems for through vehicles. t: J k. ..." ,.....) ---, aco J - -.'V O 0/�\ o 0 O C. v (\,1. V a. f Sri `� J i OJyr lei C.) � Cf) cv" 0 N lit --,......, .st,i --4 • Or�r rk., rk Yl , to i CO 0 14 W co c CO o co N y A RS Vt 1 i , O. 1 to I 7 ,cam �. Z V.--5C ...5,: i.p4 z .... . .... ....at6., ......,.., h y vl I a -� la tC o 2 -....:t;7zb.(N 64- 4 ,,,z,i �v OH ,z _ ; •V ii E i.\fl 6 W -----3 i r_ ,_.., --z , ,j 12 V ,D) --i- r C1 , ....4 c V,„, t_., 0 g ED. e- i„.01 i 4$ Q...i c r Q 4 ,§ • u) M O N .I Z ` , V O = 7 .�., �, Cl) . * b° c---- -� a2 r co 0 ~ mt''' .N sk -- E cial___) i... .. 6 ,,,, .... , . . co '.e L-Y---- . .'7; =0.L"I"I"4 .717) 4 (7)— 1 \'4j ,' 1:=3 l'z .C13 ta ,--71 ii .....,_ L.„ .., .,L,,, _ t--,, :- .......1..., ..- L, ,) 6 4 c•9 _ .. -''' -; ' --7-- ___. , .., s. s �� a� `' 0 0. � ooW 2 n 3 • '.".' \.S'-'‘. 14----- :,t13, t C . l'()'CC p\ 1 C.\_) ILI d \-1. % \V c to '''''--\ C----na-- - . o to 4 , .4. 1 ----0 .--..s 0 ..s.... ,. , 1 il'C . rz:g 0 :',:c• )-- 4 .? 74111114ii, N.) ,,_- cu CIS' E . :°°). .-- F 41- • \ , co M N g ' c 2 ,. ',,. In )\ \S‘ k -) 0 ' w 0 cs, :..-,.., . N\ ii (I V c-)-- V v---- ..zr IC ' L-,,-,C" . fiQt .,_ 13 o J r E m -� c 03 .0 ° 6 1 .i„ n 4 ?' 1 \--..4 r. • ' '''' kk :.„ tffr.„ -z . k or • t5 to n '� :.AS. . s,...,-,k13: W 0(Ls,\ �.r) 4,1 C IA :, k 13. CD _„... .,.. ,_, , , \ ‘,,,i 4 ...., a., 2. ,..:. , r(. . sJ � N g .'.''. 14 j. ld % .... , e % _ r4 A 4 N 3 RI L O ~ C CD RS 'St ? 44 w� N$ w ( \ o � 4 • '"I.! eu 'I. Yag Yrl.C ; J o ti d ,, 0-- h y. 0. 4 4 :4 %w L Z Z 4 { „, _. ._ i Nci) (Cr) k V C CO' kt (4 Idter c) c)t, 1,- — :"/"•-- 67'b N \ 1 Q0 -, i o 3 aJ in . V . 0 ---F 1 — 90 -4.--i- i; 0 M o N 0ba CJ 61 w w cn . W VD �- o CD .— MO `c K _ . .., 0 --1 >t , co -----,-) 4 ... k,\., § rcl., n -.. . , .9 j \3- O I- L co c m o -v '-2 N 4 . - v N, 1) s -' c(). CD . , , ,_,,,Q , w Ek - „.„,- ,...,,-„, „,,,, .,„ . t=,..... a/ \7'\1 \f. ''.., 4 . ., ./c , :.,,--, C ,. , r `U , � C , ,,..,- .1„ J !_____-_y c' si I I t.) ©) o co ++ C .� J = c M H V) O Cr) c30 a CO a N CZ ". 0 H- Ce 0 CO 0 C NCD z w 2 �v Z' a� a 4 z V 1, i.. ,,, , (::- , .,„ 0. 0. i4 , w �� g #1 rye , COMMENT SHEET .. ' Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion , D Open House PRAIREThursday, August 4, 2011 mi €r 14 E s ITT A 5 to 7 p.m. Name: a....„..„.., X� _ (C)__ /0- Address: ,� Phone: " 5L// — Y I Email: cce., s tr► 0 ` mac 1 , C© Y,--ti_ Comments: Gc C- (5 - 4 I— )9` oS L L:`� 4.- _11_ /--, h-e, ) A A k, I -,,, 1----e--( i---11 pi 2 1 J f c,./ 47t.,60-- del a._ vi ci 2:;- t-,0 b e._ c„ A ki C a t tA :'. . ''- ':, ,fif--) COMMENT SHEET :,-.7'', "''',1? ''" D E it '° 0 Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 UESEYA 5 to 7 p.m. Name: L-i J r Address: [5h0 2 ULa tiJaz ✓d a, EP Phone: q7 2 -1v°I- 027(0' Email: 'wood e_dP pY. nil Comments: JA , /mod i2Ap (j ljdziL - fitt 1 .c% /J &I F y. , (fol•Ltiudi l'Ate.h . J do Ad /4-1.e (i Ix( -Z1-,Le, IJ„/A./. A_ .. 9,,aff ed , ivim. 4dA,,,b_ed z ',Id. i o ai-ktit--e- ita.h-u avi „uto, lin, i-e.dc, p ziAL_As , ii(.6-0, iLaiii,o( b .0 (vaim 0 1 t/u� ,Q p),,,l,�,% m a. 4 Let utzA,Ii d 14-ac ..e-Iat A-tiki ikw11)-? - e/.1- u,(., p i A /6‘.}A_ i 4 ni f H C L'1 N cai !E/(/. O ,o. (.1 Ike_ ( `L,f l ii/d no�.C!C1 o ' .m UGC d a'ttmt baiiA tea-_ f/i e COMMENT SHEET D E s' , IA 1" Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion 1 Open House PRA1REThursday, August 4, 2011 1PESDT , 5to7p.m. Name: % e€- / / f.,i- Address: / 75. i�;q- #wfir_ 770_ i Phone: Cf - q7 "' /Lr, 7 Email: Comments: .y tr.iexyt,ti 1,--1( . 771 _5 at1ai-r-,et�/ Trz r.4%--- Li L-4,VE . L /NA" iae.1./it ...,...)-0/) i s 4___- r it i-e.95 e)F A P•i /.•✓4 ev-' WE / A/C i tac 2.714 7714 c. BC-APgF,T S Lpei/o'er. x COMMENT SHEET ito I' s i ' r.i'.�; Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EOpen House Thursday, August 4, 2011 r 5to7p.m. Name: AN 604 Lk Address: tpii? (P � ri �� Phone: q s c 2—9 ! �,_2)O/ ! y 6° Email: Comments: at l4eLeji7ac,0 ..(--'n,y1: of - Ya )6/11J OLf\O 11711A,0/17) eK, i/ 1/V 5:s 4L0 c(__ cc-4-37, (7_,-(,) 1,L, k) (`(T9-r-- pa)ii\-, a- #0 11/0-) -7v-- c61k04) te, 14, _ 04,___404, 4 r-- S -- COMMENT SHEET Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House Thursday, August 4, 2011 5 to 7 p.m. Name: i, -v'ia- `171u L L I p S Address: O7 S _ Z Phone: q52 ' 3D- 6;5 OS Email: Comments: �IJJ d 4-edi4abiii...-4 .--rit, --k_k_a_Li.,0 ,30 ?)41,2_..4,_s_c) zitfA,Le -A 4-41-0 ci .- r .o. . COMMENT SHEET -, °� Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EOpen House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 �rr N E S Ors 5 to 7 p.m. Name: /4/qgt ---- AJ6- S72o Address: B 6 ? 0 G--a_ l &--7/6 Phone: G S 2 ` l -- j /3 y Email: ,0c r , ,f ly+-? 0 _m, C 21 Comments: _ S 6 C I( fe—, 2.r CU l, a-at 'i .r ® � ��'r lac �r o M � e 4< <2T Ao / , 4' 1% e /I , 01-Y.-CV/ CO ey 0 e0 7 ce lec k ,, U (14 4-<-4' r9 f ' . atA-0 if\e Loe' � � efr _ E-( 5-0Z iviL i- 5' .- 1,1,0 c j 4 0}evt 6_,J;(7 - ,, LL1c_X-; Q re a (O1J /L. o ifyi-\ SCE (z.,cie___6/j _i(c1,- ( pil/iLP - - i'6,2f CoK , (ea % fie vu (/ ci -r_..a c'k‘e___ ai. ' (c e4 tc // COL( IC/o0/ .'Mr//s 21 __ --C r ac© �� c,' f ut,j5- 60 lScc�rrc1,2 Y ` COMMENT SHEET x °� Baker Road 4-La ne to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRARE: Thursday, August 4, 2011 Min Fi€ Or 5 to 7 p.m. Name: 6rEKI-- _I-kw Sri-, Address: t L g 0 S++-14 -4 41O2'0Ce S _ (76 Phone: c--i' c a- / s i 7 V - J Email: 0 0 i - ,.5. j G Wl li - Co tat., Comments: C9 CAS-- ck6- ��e5 due_ - ir(/tc r eG S rf5, , 0,_j' CC 1 d0 -� �e-0 S /fr. A 1 �f S 64- 6_P-71- -7 .-(),- Y yl S co-1-- cri'Q-o \if ,k E ff, ,_ 14 C f,6, nios4- Q-,-- c,40_ ,2 -k-f-5 4, ,--id -Qt 3 k�f-Su ,S c0 r s . Y Y, COMMENT SHEET E '�1 ,„"� ' ,_ Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House . 1 Thursday, August 4, 2011 RA tNfE.3GTA. 5to7p.m. Name: ` r w 1 OI Address: l S) 1-5 E E r -Plau-r .) 5 €-C. Phone: r;?52_. Qqa - 1 Email: Comments: khT CAIAVGE A(.1 yzhi/A/g -f 1 62.ke,-?0,3tE c'S circa. .� (A �b r e - 1- ism c f('4.0 .4) h it - rr 6� riapr-T r- k - -_. --PcP-Pr<36(elir) aC(4eer-"Pci7d i‘ aSet-4 ' )61 . f' -fg 7-- f cn -i- -- lam; -5 (c r ,'. z -aP� COMMENT SHEET t' h . .° i Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House P AIRIE Thursday, August 4, 2011 IEGT : 5to7p.m. ,, Name: Address: -' );17q j (q74g Phone: Email: Comments: r fit- a_,46ePtfl,- - -. e;(---c.` , be3 A) 4Thile) i,c41/— /--r;i4e7")- to-- 2.,It-7 o 9 c7- . /1 M9/ l) teuS i t?ZfrfF1C-- woad JYibv, _\,, (22„„,„_,,, „ -- L --,2'. - 7`, Ls L,im ;r v &1-Ni g- d e_071-1, '7 cvavw m u)_:-', ,is LE 2c1 s77 141 /71, , ` X/ COMMENT SHEET � �g Baker Road 4- Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EDEN Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 4.1 n RfE S DTI 5 to 7 p.m. Name: 4- Address: l f� �4-n1 / /Q 4,t Phone: ��� -��1- d187 Email: Comments: t - v„) 3 ,y, 4- > , 1,_ - COMMENT SHEET ill Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EDE Open House PRAiRE.. Thursday, August 4, 2011 TA IN Ei oTA 5 to 7 p.m. Name: JCJI , Address: 6ck,a &L v_a toD Phone: Jz. 90L Bcc--7F Email: Comments: TorziQ LAQES k 1 ?c ANITD zt' ICE uzs TL t 3 YY - 1--cos 2r) VtL vArc EoFclzcirju1/4E1.)-r LA,c +3C-7 SAC NAL LEE) -tocc-ccO r PCB Dt 1.A3P 1, COMMENT SHEET —R, n,, 04, Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House pRAIR1E Thursday, August 4, 2011 AT r rt N 6 3 nT .. 5to7p.m. Name: 1/-e' �� ,p! ic.iJe Address: g 7/�% )7:(,. .__d, e ey,, eer...z,fr , yff , �c,' , Phone: (0:77) �� �,/oq — Email: Comments: • i „ -4' ,,,r , \ F)/-xi: 2 --,&"e-', -I 1 fe 1 7'- .7i� 4 _4,4--/-1 1, -7 X ie� �� i �f-frZ e��G-iZ-" J am, J COMMENT SHEET F , w� i 1- Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion ED , Open House PRA1RE Thursday, August 4, 2011 69 15 N ESUrrk 5 to 7 p.m. Name: /aC�r c / 6. lJ YZ--r' Address: /-/ ?ci C. Pt t2. 0 7 "J 4c.._ C-ilGr�'l_ er4, Phone: <5- t•.. q.87 "- / c?-s` Email: 19,17 C., .�5 Uc. 1 01 ,-, a CO ti4 i43 r d A( 7_' Comments: */- -tz_-0e - --�� .11111 .. 51-4-.7.:1-e... • p •��---ze-,�� .._.ems C -d-Z2-e�i-vx� .�� ---2--, 11511 Ri 6.14 7- _____- e.e.-,--„e_a-,---...)., r:7-k-i-Ze2__-‹._..eg--e4.-- .. e_.e,P.____.-- -4-4/A-- --7..� 1 0 IAA pq dam! - �J -L(i `7 r 2. jo'-e--e " r19�, — "e___-. , ,z-P,P . ---)L4i-e--L- ,(-0--LU ..) -e-- ev---cfc4la — ,-----A-a-eLee-x) 22-1. '---12-"4-`r--i. CLI'l . ,,,,L,0,,,, ).aa e r r ceci_e_eaez, .„ /;,66'---P--‹-d-9 ce-tiyr-c.i ---e-:-2----f-e-e—,-) 0 yyze- �a r �, COMMENT SHEET P. '� �°- Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EDEN Open House PRIIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 AlifiNESCT ; 5 to 7 p.m. Name: ��L", V � 4,--77,J /L Address: (ram try"): Phone: 76 .937 c ,YJ/ Email: 7.ev Z2/ 7-4//c T92 C d/ / Comments: r4z rh--,e7 9 z/47/usy- 1/0: /7 N e r 7-0 EX ,et"s7- 72zs J;7>veoz.., is //t/ yzys-te-4), /(}4.- /m„- / /`1 S 7#1.1 i' E / E Ce)/Zt- y Am-k6 7--,4/7///v -s- z(_)0 S_A-rx /(1_4s, 7z-//9 /4- /vc S / e) • /. 0 .%tee /i7 /V/ r ii 5 09/r/ ze-//,',e‘.,;(/G/ yff,#&- z / 3T To i' ,E-,0 /7 ( f-f /4 � August 4, 2011 To: Randy Newton, Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie From: Vern & Linda Faber 6601 Tanager Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Re; Baker Road Lane Conversion We object to the Baker Road lane conversion for the following reasons: 1. It will NOT be three lanes, it will be TWO travel lanes. 2. If that portion of Baker Road was known to be the scene of many accidents then there should be concerns, but I am not aware that it is a problem. It appears the biggest problem with accidents on Baker Road are at Highway 62 and I do not think that this conversion involves that intersection. 3. Some bicyclists claim that sometimes a vehicle whizzes by closely. With four lanes a motorist can easily steer around them. With two lanes, the cars will still whizz by them. If the bicyclist is on the shoulder area, the motorist will most likely be closer to the bike than if there were four lanes. 4. Traveling north and turning left to Edenvale Blvd will still cause a backup. The backup could potentially be longer with single file traffic going south and the northbound vehicle will need to yield. 5. With the speed limit at 40, I have the right to expect to go 40 mph lawfully. If I approach someone from the rear who is going 30 mph I can get around them fairly easily on a four lane road by legally going 40 mph. On a two lane road at 40 mph I will be delayed by someone going 30 mph even if I have a right to go 40 mph. 6. No matter how you try to mark the turn lane, no matter how you try to educate drivers and no matter how you sell it, an open, unencumbered turn lane is confusing to drivers. They just don't know when to use it correctly. 7. Why? Just because it can be done, must it be done? t ; COMMENT SHEET i �� it 11 Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EOpen House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 MiriNgSCITA 5 to 7 p.m. / c,,,,,,-„,[4 �' Name: , / .PsLFL Address: 7 a G V t Si A- &&vL L ),4to Phone: "ls a.-`TD2 'lq s V" s53 VI) Email: au. P Cz-?Mc • l)d-- Comments: PIA Yx-E WI 1 I la- CL I'D-We-kit ttn__ Betiu -1?-Lt--b-eits motes . - ' k6-0 (rt Sia0HA__)(144) , Gt' 14 , ( Di '16, D wiLIA a c.o4A>1--ex) 4-bouRi/iiaLc . At - ULOA-6) /h OA . 1„,_-7,, "I-1412-r- iketnA, 'bat:14/ vv vv �� fe-ttAVal , r. r/ik 6Gle-S / (i()I\g--PA) atall P-fJe' GhAM_S *) WA-?,6 d- --il 01 566- o- - -- Oda/Lie- L i iv mil,G�AA o c � tik-1-----WA C1' M& /5 WPM i 7kive Yc [S 9 E ? 3r COMMENT SHEET f v, -; } d 4: ; Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EDEN Open House PRA1RE Thursday, August 4, 2011 5to7p.m. c-= 0 Name: �-� Address: Phone: j 9 � r: Email: Comments: 1z,� i5'G i. Ch - � y..E } COMMENT SHEET "i" w'h ri 1,-E Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion ,E, DOpen House PRA. RE Thursday, August 4, 2011 miriNE'BOTA 5to7p.m. Name: 412 4f77U2 /4-affiggg-{2.-- Address: 007 ,t 'Guub C g? 5- 3 6 Phone: -63 C 9 — 7 7° I Email: ?/-i-S�lzcl2 f/f Z-�C tcs4S�'p T Comments: (a� .L -� ,,, �, 1,� ---- ..,,,,, 6, ,._, , e-Alit ...7. 1---)-La, zzeri-d -- fik,,,,i, ._ ,4 g.,,, ,_ - ,,,&7 •� , ____ ,,.,/,,_, , ,,,,,e„, ,:„ _..„-__„_,,,(,....) .4/ ,,,r,„...,,,, ,,07,---,,,„4, ,,,,, xi", „..„,,,,,- ,,,,...0 ,_ , ,, ,_____ i.,,, ,,,,,. , ,, ,,y4„,/,_ ,;_16, ,,,,,,t .4,c_e—e .---- 16-4A-4--- .40-4--„de- _--m r�-T"' ire u�e.___--- A- ..e,- ....4vt_e_ , /}�� / COMMENT SHEET ` -$ �� Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRA1REThursday, August 4, 2011 Mil'iNgSGTA 5 to 7 p.m. r= Name: )11()A6r,,(1 --'( Address: �J Phone: 1qff - / / �.J�!� ` 917 ' ::ents: (iC/.e.-- -6()-(...1-14-, - ek)2-_ i-W e7--/--, 1— --/I a---d:24 . M.- ..//(---(0-- -- (- ,cam' Q / s I 19---/-e_ -` �,. �i .��J `1 , 1, r �� . Y-t°- - -7 ' COMMENT SHEET ii r ��.i. Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EOpen House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 WI t ri PI 6 fIGTA 5to7 p.m. Name: 0_,LD63 -Q ..,- \---\c' A Address: , -1 a L CCU �[5�w Phone: g73' ) 9J4 5 l n ( Email: Nme ,..k (X D - 9A m cm e Comments: CDLE-c- ---AIN‘ ) iS S )•29___.S i 1--)1 ---c\ c---e---- \ ----D Cc - e.__ , fin,:cam-._ e -csz_ ',c1,, c,___w . aim `ors � - �. °v C )-7-3\ C) Ick'N --c\--0, -.0Q___ 02-- k31-<. 'O\CA_Q4--v--. cl)A.- - _,Iv.Q___ COMMENT SHEET s r ` ' } ;'oi °°' Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion tDOpen House Thursday, August 4, 2011 Al fhrE3DT A 5 to 7 p.m. Name: c6Ar 4 j 4 AA(oQ Address: (05 -IY\CZAC.eq {]QL.C,L kAu Phone: cts2 c13 47 1 2-1 I Email: ►—JIA CPi,ti `2-1 1 0 AO L , COP( Comments: ,Qr -Le(21x3e, (9,- -2-12-- /KA;kcei d1r4P , --J6JA" t Q (`x j , 9 , (c 1 IwQ0 \-66.Arii2e_., A ,631?,A M . s \I 4.ALQ ozAz c- l►7>> G► 4, \iv\ UO-PAkt_01,;, 0 l' i I /' WriliO, 10 ii ., iLkek0A2— j9 abbte,(wAsq Ab.-0,,IA kn-a12 SAaDzi ..d i :l. 03-ritrbD .atAt2,(, S044,6)1, clAtS) UtLOO a,Odp) (44 r ��oC -�- a �e- 4 . cut() 1 ei l J � ck/vaio b :ems :4-tA-ko C4 ilk li a nis) 1&,Q111, 0 0 ak&-tkiA (i)i'je0 /nal ak:ic U Vityf ti'S 1 le, ca_)_ J I 6i) G,c) i006,-_- /111/4.1;) , - y Y `- COMMENT SHEET .* a' 11 4-1- Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRtE Thursday, August 4, 2011 M}ri R.3 T 5 to 7 p.m. Name: 144 e-,l.€..- iS-s-if Address: /3 7/ &--a.z Gv i Zcc , Phone: 94-0 g 5/9 So302~ Email: _ Comments: .4 Q gic/e s Zz Ze--/-V o - a_ iit ., Lfi -1--, X tlait-e- 06 1 . /ob 4.2.4 c4_ 4 6s-6cJ7, 7�3 l�K- -e .za-�c- di7G ,(7 . ith _ a.,„,, . 9. COMMENT SHEET r „ , 'rieiJ.. Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion [ 1 ED Open House PRAiREThursday, August 4, 2011 k e1 14 g R,GT Ar 5 to 7 p.m. Name: rArl5 lakach Address: 6536 PrCJn?oa ry D re. Phone: 95-a - 4 75 - 9 9 5 2 1 Email: a k azh E . C_ , YI�T Comments: -Ve ,arable, sec is olhe4 we, cdrn c o v-i- r-C mort. iry f A, rhC, CieiSet- of ad ore. u rrill ir•J ►" ct:9 hf`i C/ve_ oL(' c g PC4,4 :Pv -1')/) e rc is o se_cc N d l a n e * d 'tra.-P-iL c can be_ t' , rTA +urn is 3It ()p -r a. up (ni I ) +0 (Ai -ds 62. So (Al)�n � tru c---1U r it 1 we. UL e S ,z( �i ,1 ; ,15 o u r w h e v( s -L 1,y r ,j 40 J O ,'n ±r`a_-�'12 L c ) u e„..r y s l a_01 -i'H e. x k o‘ vrc. 0.. cycco ad a r 11 �i ef-'J- lane-, -Mot/ Can in Guif1e we_ 4ry G : r7 11.-,- `P 10 w O`f '1 r o,-c c C G iS ‘,._ ak so 4rue. oci 4~ u5h inour irr. es _ bide, +vrrt r,.40 10 n e. - rlc r )5 -e f e_e Lv 1) ! e, 4 rc E P L c 7la s �D y 1✓1 -441 c 0-01 er` 1 a n (AAI r )-e- w c 5e.1- up +0 See_e_cl , 1-._ E , COMMENT SHEET .4'` ,, 11 0a Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 MINNESGTA 5 to 7 p.m. Name: Ocf---i _ 66902--"L--- Address: ) 5 I5 /—e Gem Phone: 't 5 2-— c/` a s\ 1 L Email: Comments: I ( 11 —dei._ Lee, h ervE_ is mori3/2ek-eiv t chit" T/9 y i 70 F jC r EpL IS 4-wee-f11 t?A�/ TO 42I US re) l'( E P fiOrri,S /9-ALO A-e-e-1,0L-C ettertia ci O. I&j i ..)€ f3v`r p. 7z)6.454)- LEI t fd-057720917.66/ e ms- 137/0S cryf IfJCC 756 6-e- /p-1r�s� F v 7Le Pr) rr_r ef, r) Ai 1 _G -Y- -5/ 4. rev LUP 4 6- i vAv�� /IQ � � 11K L ,/v -C./1 15 A sieigA7-fizz A Cein IS Ghr use's 6y A ve-htc ihit-v, in) er osi, Di 2 -- We,7— m,i-nJ', 11 COMMENT SHEET i , a rfVr j= Baker Road. 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 ttrgirr 5to7p.m. Name: j Q1d iP.Ir}rh Address (i I -ZO1C -V1C0/73CI CA01 ;4'av - /' 'A) Phone: Email: ir)il CurI ctliao1. C Comments: 340 1 b A tcit aim) /-4l1 �n�a �u (n 5c�� �� � ern? t � rof(e_. y t 1t"efiClan- w t(l +c ?9&0\C 6 -f-q avyk5 Pitrhile5as6G1- 'r") 4' wg:Ltin.5-R b)5stv i o o61 0 -- -k. Water 5 5ck�[ c ,� �� C4rctikeP ,d`h ,Cafe r a ) Cr k �' f� 15 a,frca31 10 us C w ram' 6\110, i--s pvii 04 ctuo,ss -N-(1. 111'125 --i-o V-i-- 1 n _ - trAde a'alioroos \ hk-'1 04 "81 4 -Ai 17 mal5 - ryas b .ujor) -Ad ` -' 'o fn+ 111AiL 6b, iim,_y ,-- or)H -cC i 9 h n -1) Th7ALL un5 , 4f?-1-eik '" bS 1CP W&--) - 10 t-QJS W l ! l S 1 l I -1-6 Y10-c ,/`b olc v` f1 4-0 irol 0 0- cy43 63t.r 44/r) si e Ji.e_d: cd rec3() 6\ lA -- w f+6 (-Qi cr,s 0111 vei S car) . ii, Aa l --- -- .rc� �ay.. �olr� t 0,�S -, l us �'za COMMENT SHEET �, ,s,' „ Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRIE„ Thursday, August 4, 2011 5 to 7 p.m. Name: �i`-'-` \ L-v--\\,---.A't Address: 13 7 0 1 Cave t c Q L.--,N Phone: ( 5;2, Gj`-7C/_ �� f c Email: CO v\' l� \- Q I ,tom- 5 , a Comments: 0 CD 0 , .-e • -S a_`--' t ii)--Luo,,,._ ,D , as Co c, 1 s s� S1 ove__94.. ` r i✓( i 1 6 ac) 6 dr()) f-/- Cow ' S ;d >o Pi-‘s: -r-e.._ 6( c.-. c__ ..---P---sN's\--- >c'-4.---m 7.—o-,-,A-- C 9- 1--' e_ ? E A.N.errg -e,"-, lie L.,r\,_ c > r ,› 5 ---t-C-v-- a c...-D )--„, cz_L t ) c)-?....7 . RA-&- 1--t--5- G 0 vk ;,-e. 1.,),rotL,6 dr- A-1--e--"N- (--0'e-- jc) L - k efz) 2--( Laa....., -, 1A-y u ,4.-,/ fe-e----r �C(/`'L ( 1 0 `�-2> `` No COMMENT SHEET Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion E D Er Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 I E,S OIT 5 to 7 p.m. Name: P VC Address. oss O0 2 Phone: �?j -! Email: Comments: t/ 1.-4 WILL- f — S``, c � OSIP C'7° @-n-IP4.3(kreq„,_ w One) ! IP w t -L - ( c g cC J (),0 - � j ' : COMMENT SHEET 'e Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion DE E Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 to 7 p.m. Name: 3 1'/N C /P s'a Address: £8cj� -c/ O4P 'ci i el Cr) i-+7 Phone: 7 2— 9,32 Email: Comments: di i 9 4, 4 /eV A Gli die X. se v- the !-re Ai< 6 /ey„/ Piv AhNs /127.1v Ai cle 07e-se e Gt_ rc l ) /cA frieD gfre e s/�h�.CJ /9' 99. ,70 67,1-61 C ZI.77 /—/)( i ' 1, COMMENT SHEET lAb� _ ��s $D ' - Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion E ;, Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 /ft1 f, 3Ori 5to7p.m. Name: v " I 1 VU Address: l , -1 09 Cvt(lX 62, 1,,,944/ Phone: q5D-- - q -74 -9/ V-Iq Email: L0\ 17Ct (M 1 U5_ am Comme • , • ---al,-(Ai‘ , /(5V/ acje__ (.7 . (1)6. ' fA[f�/^J �� f I COMMENT SHEET „"„ hi`�.° Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion E Open House Thursday, August 4, 2011 al i r�r 5to7p.m. Name: CTG-NI �1a°C Address: b.81 o -C31=0~3 itj Phone: (sc:;:) c3A 1'°Sc Email: /► 6Cill)--)(1- Comments: LA kk N C,�Cet..r., ---- cD D-M") (_YP"+-ia_ bu*.+.s L) . PE, 1 it....kr-f.tc_. — C VaL.‘..) IS Do — r �y-../E).-) ' i-L tiLL l'r— 1 COMMENT SHEET L 'E :`, - r #psi Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion ,EDENOpen House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 NI I Pi NE .GT A 5 to 7 p.m. -- '-- \ Name: C\k_JV \''c T C7 i Address: -,,___' \?Da \ \(-)\1\InN Phone: ' ,,r -,--' \ � `Z\ Email: C T7?% o tt\\ - \r) _j Comments: 1- Q 7 . 1° CM k_) CV-4 0 n 4 t , .). z., -- 1,,,c_.\,.\ \ „A-, c-- \ , , Th\, ,,_§,, r r Sa . 3 � 3 ,„T , COMMENT SHEET F h ' i , -., A1p0 Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 , 5 to 7 p.m. Name: >grriy g, 6c,g--, Address: 1,356 a G 7 z-e-6 (Ut' Phone: 952- q,34 - tD6i5 Email: 46?6C6/1-0 Q . God Comments: 04 /7/& ., !/0 ! 771/-1/J , J a- bad U at? . /n ems , ,, eha, J* z,,,,i I - ... h ad C,0 7brut,-/ / 7 3 , , a- need /ve e / , �,o7f /?—, 11--„14___) --/--A,& (c»/e _di •Ig -�) )?-19air--, ID g-4 9 4 4'„ arr.,,, k„,,,,,,,,,, ,n 44,,/ and f-W . i loito:jil;,., .i_f_ Ath o rn 0/7 m Rd. NeeM29,52,wij „, ie.f ,bc l ap HD1 led ,' i cads , , , 1 IO Di.e. //aLe ,L2. fie- y . i/- h.O.O a 7,r ibaI -. M .e__, G(J,i:16., , God o7')) , ai)cl . p h_e,A.e a._e_ af.?6:6_i_ocJ- - a -2 16 4-e_ mob. Kaieci Art-Az/ S c4' L3 N,a— ,bad /�� j. ,d.- _ems 1-f A-6 1 !1 tli , COMMENT SHEET � o n� t �e� I•: ' _ . Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EOpen House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 UFINE•SET ; 5 to 7 p.m. Name: wo,,, ,d ©; // Address: 13 /7 Z ciiie.oimt L C LCz_ PI44 Ea:/r) Pp /R £. Phone: gS-D- — Q-i0-5- Email: A i i' i' __. g C„, C, _, .. . ,-/- Comments: -:511.11 4r) € r0. 0 .i 6,6 .i ' , , ,5 7 of i/Cl Y ` Th / .1,) ) / C Ve )6(ec'e3 (7i i E ,, i tf if -1- A Os li A I,* Aitie 1,:v ,:s.,t,o A) 0 .4.4)e) :7-/pit)::::, We_ dfro CF6 /w Tip Pil 5 scow ? 4 Si4 6,l iii) ftô ,4tJ ,1' --- MIS X . , y & 'cyctcz- 4/ &&$ :f / " /1,k tir 1/ 4: / -r- Ls s_5414-4 ii.evid erhVie. k5 ./._. A ce),icce To 56" triRifgr.,:r AL)TO,s 55e0_441 )&:mrcLE_ - O/ 5 COMMENT SHEET r is Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EDENOpen House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 ATIrifilSGTA 5to7p.m. Name: &'ec--(Qr00,-\ Address: (' W2JOCOC),(t.--Pik.CO Phone: 4 Email: C-V\(t S )-i2--`TQ,` /i NOC) '1 Comments: // CD RQ_ (.9--e-r_Sr)N‘‘ U•JI\ J yO•Oe-CY\Q_A-.-\r- &12"--C"Ii\-6 L \\ . 1 c c \ s LOA trA PaCry-vISN. k.04, ‘Ayes-e___ ocoL7\e_ . gc Se* \r-N 31\r)\S bf-C. 92A -‘13(° 'CC-QkLC3(r\-SZ)- Wr .S)r\- \C5\Q) ) yym 1��C ec r e& � col a 60 (s--\--(Ad. A,0 LOT su 'C p, ._ ` . -` : E. -'' COMMENT SHEET 1. 0 ` P le" Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAHUEThursday, August 4, 2011 5 to 7 p.m. Name: 4z,.. i,,,,,, / ,4 ii L-3.r< Address: 69&.5 M4e/A . v,v DR- Phone: CAS) '3 7 `' i15'6 Email: ��G'L ( g COinr,/1.5T. if/A % Comments: I ,,g4e0f) j-A4,ei c,. i'lZ Arrid ram- /4-13•14/et-leS e/ - 67.E ri-1/2-e.,44/1-41-.i ,/ r , ': ,, //"(4 c'cl- ,./9.-Lx.r- ..,4 /....,-.7.1,,1_„,11)--A.A4.- .. 5"...0,--. .4.1. '4''/X - ' 7g e't)42 e7.2...?_. )73.0.4. 2g") „/„1//let 17 ,Z,4::-/i „a:do, Af774,-( „zt t, ,../41A,,- /z,,,v_ee.„... 1 ,,z14,-- „1,/,?... 4,7 ci c,f,y7,7 4,---e. 74.7-2,6(A-?, alet.r4/- ,?‘ e.A.././7..z4Z i/es-?;--c, :,:d , „6-1.5 ..e:64) 7 --- id . -)...,----4-, 6fAie,L. R.6/. i (1,4, ,,Kkv_i3 ..7,.. ca v6___) „(„Aiii-i,6,0_6ta.„4,,z, ,,,,:z.& ,,,,,t-est,L..0' ,I '.1 • (1<7..•.A"'a-. . . d . -/,-P-0`71-17 /79w/7,- /def."; v " •7 _ , ,'-' '''' 4' COMMENT SHEET -... .- , ,...- Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion E EN Open House PRAIRIE• Thursday, August 4, 2011 5 to 7 p.m, MINNESOTA ir ir eenc-' rki Name: i A ))," ' .,., Address ire'P "ii „ 4-- ..1,, / L •1 Ili t(--"' // A, ,---J J ),,W Phone „.---1/ )° i7, . . / 11 F , .0 4 4 ' .6 .Y2 ,1".-"-i .-.,7NA: / Email: ;•j,0 4 1 i t.(4• ••,..."",•,?'6'. r ••• ".., 7 '',' "'r ' i i ••"•• ' 1-.` i ir Comments i(6 1 : i KY 1 t I i // ) ,...,-•=',.•"'"-," ' ) -. ' ., -" , A-',.-- • . ' ,- t.''' : i ''' ( '''. : , / ; i 4 ' , .‘\ '0„, , ,"I he (I'i1- , • /4• ,, - '.••••.! '' ° ,.:' ' 'L i ' t A . 5: / Cl/1 ': ( ( ''-')e ( I (/ C ' ' ( - t "'( ( '''I t 6,, ' °,._ V C, f .-' :c•••<. , , , •ir- ..,--t ,-, 1 / .. .. -.. ., i c , • , i f / ; e 1 i I iI .. 7. /4.'ik ( ,•,„., 2..1 4 ,'.2. 2 . .2 , . ,,,.. „., , , , ' ° = • ' ,,.. .' 2 • < ., - t( , ,... 7- i ,, • r i ,,-,' ((...,.-• i •.,.. / , il.). ,' -- \ / N, ..t., ,.. i- ... . e „ ---,- _ P .,..... 1 •, -: ,' tJ .I. . i ") ,zir 7 r 4 ' - 2_ ' t . 2 ' .7E , /7 / „f:e2 i;t-. 1 /A 7/ ^ ° COMMENT SHEET 3. ;j _g hi;-iv Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion E ' Open House PRAIPJE Thursday, August 4, 2011 U ri N 6v OTA 5 to 7 p.m. Name: .°' ( 7)( 1-10/2—SC(4 Address: I s o okt< / LL 07 Phone: gs07 l 3-7'- 1 7 Og- 9 Email: hm //07''�-�- C ti i nCs� /1S Comments: IUD Pid Plii til se-1 oal 0-r C YC/)&&' area if we c ii) t' / ie 7 lecij , lino Ylk 17 z. f-i ce %s kia/ e / , evti 6 v/461 /1-2 foalaks . (-e-pptirif 14,,1 iwo7i-it, 30,1: VP - d __71 ) r 1 aio .Ae p !me-6( 0649 ,6/ a-gic op/iv/7h, Y 0 ifi(/hr. (ibuil 12/.e4 ( hMd /4/ e Zoi) era) c 6 criell4o-i e : , - `= COMMENT SHEET '`I, , 4, 1 6H' l Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Open House PRAIRIEThursday, August 4, 2011 1 r .rd E OTA 5 to 7 p.m. Name: C ,5 Ni-- - Address: RS 5] '-/m 1 '` / N 0 sSj39 Phone: (0 1,4 J 8 85 Q5 Email: tik1S -77)C - , O1 , K9, f _- +DG4w cDra . Comments: f ' (e)KIN OF 1Ai1/21- K�S +- ra-\ - 1 za 'ti , COMMENT SHEET 3 , i � � aw �'� i Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion EDENOpen House PRALiff Thursday, August 4, 2011 lNF,SGTA 5to7p.m. 1 Name: Address: 6 Cf3 5 ,°, € t1 Agx) Phone: 9 7 ,7/ 6.1S Email: e(7-krnavvi J. L s eartediteK,not ' -� �� Comments: 4 Z- Tei .� �' �,= e,, ? -Skeet i / ` / Peeycke 64-/-J a ea e .izett max, avim. zee, G���.' a/ Cl 6 . ,C . .LI/".J/ -�c -- 4., j .4.-,zaJ,��� :.Z,/Le,,"�� o .- (7,,Etr,evit,11/13'1,,i re A i, ,,66 Azz") .. �. /41-1-- /-e-e-,2-ideco-Md-6 A,, c/ tAl , ,..�.____._ram 3 .. , ,,/ 11,tie.� J; ".,�,/1 I_ .- - ° - ' . Zeo" ..lr�:61.e ' , �/ € ,,CC�� , .lit-`'.6teee . ..to ../„/„Le -4 ,,g2,6„, --,,..." .----771--00-7z—,ey- :Z1 ' 4iecie- If/ a ,i),-,te x itie-R7-70 7ii,e-tot41,-.., X/121-ereLez:214/ , t ft-iiI 4,,; c4., irdi-04 —lu ii‘Of .1 digit„/,,,44.1,„=.7 _,/,)-e-tL CIS 1 ' J) U a LZ i�C.Z,c .,-) ` s e_e-x,/ 471.4-0-06 --;':,tAle-1,77t, iLef i e , , lee;--e(Ake, / th _4 i-ik _, -f's �, 3-,L-- ram[ agi2115' .i".4�,,J 2ys`''� LI ` COMMENT SHEET Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion E D E- Open House PRAIThursday, August 4, 2011 '} rriraE.5Gr 5 to 7 p.m. Name: t,61.1/44110t4 Teri Grokit Address: t 331)0 0 i s L&v Q. j e A`a.j rte- MN C �3 Y Phone: 35-a- 17 -4 3'7 3 Email: d&o yc k0c2. Co m Comments: e a p p 0 seet + corA Yew-S 0-i( 0 & ky c] /61 4 Q-Az , M 1-)1 yit2 s Gto 1(--40(A) ti U5.2 Ct VAI r)vt is cr2 a ce- MACG VI U S ut err WI atole_ jood ail uPAc?-vj- -1441-- Lorene McWaters From: LJG [Ijguertin@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:09 PM To: GRP-AllCouncil Subject: Baker Road Changes Dear Sirs, In regards to the planned changes to Baker Road described in the letter I received last week I have a few comments. I've lived on Pinnacle Drive for almost 22 years and my lot backs up to Baker Road. I don't like the noise at times but I can live with it. As I drive Baker Road every day, I agree that the road needs repaving and I hear about it from friends that come to my home and mention it's roughness. I had not seen any communications in any form from either the City of Eden Prairie or Hennepin County about proposed changes to be made until the letter I received last week. I realize Baker Road is a County Road and 1 assume any maintenance/changes are probably dictated by Hennepin County but the Eden Prairie Council must have some input to the planning process. But where was the citizen input during the planning phase? The reduction from four lanes to two, and the left turn center lane, is a giant step in the wrong direction and is one of the most ignorant decisions I've seen in years. Every "major" North/South route in Eden Prairie is currently two lanes and I believe many Eden Prairie residents have thought that hopefully, someday, they would be upgraded to four lanes. I'm referring to County Road 4, Dell Road and Highway 101. We only have one road with four lanes now and that is Baker Road and now we are going to lose that too. This is progress? Remember the many grade level interchanges that the Eden Prairie City Council insisted on having on the new Highway 169 when County Road 18 was upgraded? And the multiple millions of dollars that were spent just a few years ago to put in interchanges that should have been there originally and would have cost much less? All that just to 'slow traffic down'. When will we learn from our experiences? Back in the 1950's, Highway 100 was "THE BELTWAY" around the Twin Cities and a lot of it was a three lane design with the center lane for passing and left turns. It was considered a dangerous design and was the site of many severe accidents. We all felt thanks when the State of Minnesota FINALLY replaced it. It's probably too late to change the plans now but I know I, and every Eden Prairie resident I've talked with, think the current plan in absolutely STUPID and wish the road would just be repaved and the lanes left as they are. Louis J. Guertin 6568 Pinnacle Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Tele: 952-934-9531 2 Lorene McWaters From: Eric Vinson [eric@pursuitdrywall.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:16 PM To: GRP-AllCouncil Subject: Baker Road proposal Council members, Upon reading the article in the Eden Prairie paper regarding the proposal to reassign the lanes on Baker Rd., I was dumbfounded as to why anyone would want to do such a thing. There's a bike path running the entire length of the stretch from Valley View Rd. to 62 on the east side, and a sidewalk on the west side.There is absolutely no reason that traffic lanes should be converted to allow for a bike lane. i drive this stretch of road on a very regular basis and very rarely do I see bicycles in the roadway. Most of the bicyclists I see choose to use the bike path (which is why it's there). The very small minority of riders who choose to ride in the street are tgpically recreational bicycle enthusiasts who are accustomed to doing so. 4 would wager that I could probably sit alongside Baker road on any given day and see less than 5 bicyclists per hour and I would also wager that 95%of them would be on the bike path. Come winter, rainy days, and 90+degree days and I would bet that number shrinks to one or less. This isn't San Diego, this is MN and unfortunately our window of opportunity for outdoor recreation is relatively short.A bike lane would be used by very few and on a very limited number of days. Reducing the traffic lanes would amount to nothing more than restricting general traffic use in order to appease a very small select group of people. Which leads me to my next question; who proposed this idea?Given that there doesn't appear to be any public need (or desire) for this project, I find it a little suspect and am curious as to whether or not there's a personal agenda behind this. Unfortunately I have prior commitments for Thu evening and will be unable to attend the meeting but very interested to see where this goes. Remember, the council is elected to represent the public's interest, not decide what the public's interest should be. Regards, Eric Vinson PURSUIT DRYWALL, LLC Eric Vinson Pursuit Drywall, LLC 12771 Vina Lane Eden Prairie MN 55346 Email: ericriPTursuitdrvwall.com Web: www,pursuitdrvwall.com Phone:952-994-7568 Fax: 952-943-0726 t Lorene McWaters From: Shaun Linaya and Sam [shaunandlinaya@camcast.net] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3 22 PM To: GRP-AllCouncii Subject: City proposes converting 4 lanes to 3 on Baker Road - Very against this! Dear Eden Prairie City Council Members, I received my copy of the Eden Prairie News today and after reading the headline "City proposes converting 4 lanes to 3 on Baker Road" I had to check the date on the paper to make sure I had not received an old copy from April Fool's Day. I drive on this road between Hwy. 62 and Valley View at least 2 to 4 times each work day and several more trips on the weekends. This has to be the worst idea ever proposed in the history of ideas. believe I may have "buzzed" Mr. Nelson several times, but I believe he must be the only bike that see on this road. This is like so many other things that have passed in this city where the needs of very few people outweigh the needs of the majority. Just think about the facts in this article: 9800 vehicles travel this road each day that is roughly 1/6 of the population of Eden Prairie, you show me 9800 bicycles, heck you show me 25 that travel on this road each day. I hope to hear that you will have cancelled your meeting on Aug. 4th and offer an apology in next weeks newspaper. Thank you for your time, Shaun Klinkhammer 6234 Whispering Oaks Drive Eder Prairie, MN 55346 952-937-2388 Randy Newton From: Anne Prideaux [aprideaux@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 9:53 AM To: GRP-AllCouncil Subject: proposed Baker Road changes Dear City Council Members, I recently attended an Open House at Forest Hills Elementary school in regards to the proposed changes to Baker road. Although I totally embrace the resurfacing portion of the proposed plan, I do not agree with the changing of the driving lanes from 4 to 3 with the addition of bike lanes on the sides. Getting on Baker Road at many side streets is already so difficult and dangerous, that with the proposed changes, it will only make this process worse. There are at least three side streets that would become nearly impossible to get onto Baker Road from (Cardinal Creek Road, Holly Road and Edenvale Blvd.) not to mention the two entrances/exits to Lifetime at the corner of Hwy 62., especially during the school year. The Cardinal Creek Road area is the one that is most troubling. Not only would you have cars trying to enter onto Baker Road from Cardinal Creek but you also have cars trying to turn into the back lot of the school from both directions at the very same point on the road.There is no turn lane for the cars coming from the direction of Hwy 62 into the back lot and there is a blind spot coming around the corner to that turn, which would easily become an accident spot, since there is nowhere for the car to go if they come around the corner to find a car that has slowed down to turn. I found it very interesting that there was research done on the traffic flow during the slowest time of the year for vehicle traffic and yet no research done on the traffic flow of bicycle traffic which would have been at its highest time. (June and July) If a major change like this is done, especially around an Elementary school, I would have thought that there would and should have been research done during a school year and especially during the winter months when vehicle traffic flow is higher due to not only school traffic but health club traffic. I strongly urge you to reconsider the traffic lane changes. I do not feel that there has been enough evidence presented to even consider needing the change, let alone enough research done to justify the change. When speaking with other adults that came to the open house, I came upon three different people that were from Georgia, Alabama and Arizona that stated that in those states, the people consider the changes that you are considering to the road, suicide lanes. Please reconsider! Respectfully, Anne Prideaux i Randy Newton From: pjhoeper©hormel.com Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 10:49 AM To: GRP-AllCouncil Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion to 3 Lanes To: Eden Prairie Mayor Tyra-Lukens and Fellow City Council Members - Aho, Butcher Wickstrom, Case and Nelson: As you soon convene to continue deliberation over the proposed conversion of Baker Road from a 4 lane road to a 3 lane road with expanded bike lane/walkway, we would like to share our desire for Baker road to remain as it is, a very functional and appealing 4 lane road to those of us who live in the neighborhoods off of Baker Rd between 62 and Valley View Road. When we moved to Eden Prairie in the spring of 1998, we will always remember our initial drive heading south on Baker from 62 to arrive at our Forest Hills located home. At the time, the appealing 4 lane road was pristine smooth, perhaps just recently resurfaced at the time, the buds on the numerous trees in Forest Hills were turning green and we were pleased about our re-location choice to a new house in Eden Prairie on Candice Lane. Overall, we feel fortunate to have located to our neighborhood in what has evolved into one America's Best Cities to Live In over the years thanks to visionaries, like yourselves, for the community. Although Baker Road has taken a natural (heavy-usage) erosion beating over the 13 years that we have depended on it day-in and day-out and is obviously in need of a resurface, we question this proposed desire to convert this busy North- South Road between two heavy traveled East-West routes (62 and Valley View) into, in essence, a two lane road with turn lane to apparently appeal to bicyclist who find it inconvenient to use the wide path currently available on the east side of the road. (How many people are truly biking and or walking on Baker between December and March in any given year?) Perhaps we are selfish in that we use Baker every time we leave Candice Lane? Regardless, in the busy drive time weekday mornings and afternoons, there are moments now that we wait for an opening to turn north out of Candice Lane. What in the world will it be like when/if you turn it into a 2 lane road?What about the numerous emergency and law enforcement vehicles who we see regularly using Baker to get to where they are going fast?What about buses stopping to pick-up and let out school children?What if 1494 has an issue and vehicles are routed on Baker? Our wish and desire, as Eden Prairie/Hennepin County residents and taxpayers, would be to kindly resurface the road to its smooth 1998 condition and keep it as a very useful 4 lane road for the area residents who depend upon its vehicular daily linkage to where we all most go. Thanks for listening to our opinion and for, hopefully, making the correct decision for your fellow local residents who will ultimately be impacted by your decision in this regard in the days and weeks ahead. Sincerely, Peter and Lisa Hoeper 13748 Candice Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 ph: 952-200-4046 e-mail: pjhoeperhormel.com Notice: This communication is an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510. Its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient(s)intended by the sender of this message. This transmission and any attachments may contain proprietary, confidential, attorney-client privileged information and/or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution,reliance on, or use of any of the information contained herein is STRICTLY 1 Randy Newton From: anne@impressionmanagement.com Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 11:24 AM To: pjhoeper@hormel.com; GRP-AllCouncil Subject: Re: Proposed Baker Road Conversion to 3 Lanes We second Pete and Lisa' s sentiments. We too desire to keep it 4 lanes. Anne Warfield CSP & Outcome Thinking Strategist Impression Management Professionals 952-921-9421 888-imp-9421 Web: Impress ionManagement.com Reply message From: pjhoeper@hormel.coln To: <allcouncil@edenprairie.org> Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion to 3 Lanes Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 10:48 am To: Eden Prairie Mayor Tyra-Lukens and Fellow City Council Members- Aho, Butcher Wickstrom, Case and Nelson: As you soon convene to continue deliberation over the proposed conversion of Baker Road from a 4 lane road to a 3 lane road with expanded bike lane/walkway, we would like to share our desire for Baker road to remain as it is, a very functional and appealing 4 lane road to those of us who live in the neighborhoods off of Baker Rd between 62 and Valley View Road. When we moved to Eden Prairie in the spring of 1998, we will always remember our initial drive heading south on Baker from 62 to arrive at our Forest Hills located home. At the time, the appealing 4 lane road was pristine smooth, perhaps just recently resurfaced at the time, the buds on the numerous trees in Forest Hills were turning green and we were pleased about our re-location choice to a new house in Eden Prairie on Candice Lane. Overall, we feel fortunate to have located to our neighborhood in what has evolved into one America's Best Cities to Live In over the years thanks to visionaries, like yourselves, for the community. Although Baker Road has taken a natural (heavy-usage) erosion beating over the 13 years that we have depended on it day-in and day- out and is obviously in need of a resurface, we question this proposed desire to convert this busy North- South Road between two heavy traveled East-West routes (62 and Valley View) into, in essence, a two lane road with turn lane to apparently appeal to bicyclist who find it inconvenient to use the wide path currently available on the east side of the road. (How many people are truly biking and or walking on Baker between December and March in any given year?) Perhaps we are selfish in that we use Baker every time we leave Candice Lane? Regardless, in the busy drive time weekday mornings and afternoons, there are moments now that we wait for an opening to turn north out of Candice Lane. What in the world will it be like when/if you turn it into a 2 lane road?What about the numerous emergency and law enforcement vehicles who we see regularly using Baker to get to where they are going fast?What about buses stopping to pick-up and let out school children?What if 1494 has an issue and vehicles are routed on Baker? Our wish and desire, as Eden Prairie/Hennepin County residents and taxpayers, would be to kindly resurface the road to its smooth 1998 condition and keep it as a very useful 4 lane road for the area residents who depend upon its vehicular daily linkage to where we all most go. 1 Thanks for listening to our opinion and for, hopefully, making the correct decision for your fellow local residents who will ultimately be impacted by your decision in this regard in the days and weeks ahead. Sincerely, Peter and Lisa Hoeper 13748 Candice Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 ph: 952-200-4046 e-mail: pjhoeper(a)hormel.com Notice: This communication is an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510. Its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient(s) intended by the sender of this message. This transmission and any attachments may contain proprietary, confidential, attorney-client privileged information and/or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, reliance on, or use of any of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any matter and confirm by return email. 2 Randy Newton From: Hansen, Brian [BHansen@sjm.com] Sent: Monday,August 08, 2011 2:51 PM To: GRP-AllCouncil Cc: pjhoeper@hormel.com Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion to 3 Lanes To: Eden Prairie Mayor Tyra-Lukens and Council Members- Aho, Butcher Wickstrom, Case and Nelson: My name is Brian Hansen and my wife Debbie and I live at 13717 Jennifer Court where we have lived for 12 years. We want to echo Pete Hoeper's comments below. In addition, we have 2 drivers in our family under the age of 21 and are very concerned about the safety of the new road if it were converted to 3 lanes. Before any decision is made to convert Baker, we would like to see the data supporting the assumption that 3 lanes are safer than 4. Regards, Brian Brian Hansen VP, Finance&Supply Chain Cardiovascular Division St.Jude Medical 177 East County Road B St.Paul, MN 55117 USA Tel+1 651 756 2075 Fax+1 877 693 8095 Mobile+1 612 889 2344 bhansensim.com sim.com From: pjhoeper@hormel.com [mailto:pjhoeper@hormel.com] Sent: Monday,August 08, 2011 10:49 AM To: allcouncil@edenprairie.org Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion to 3 Lanes To: Eden Prairie Mayor Tyra-Lukens and Fellow City Council Members - Aho, Butcher Wickstrom, Case and Nelson: As you soon convene to continue deliberation over the proposed conversion of Baker Road from a 4 lane road to a 3 lane road with expanded bike lane/walkway, we would like to share our desire for Baker road to remain as it is, a very functional and appealing 4 lane road to those of us who live in the neighborhoods off of Baker Rd between 62 and Valley View Road. When we moved to Eden Prairie in the spring of 1998, we will always remember our initial drive heading south on Baker from 62 to arrive at our Forest Hills located home. At the time, the appealing 4 lane road was pristine smooth, perhaps just recently resurfaced at the time, the buds on the numerous trees in Forest Hills were turning green and we were pleased about our re-location choice to a new house in Eden Prairie on Candice Lane. Overall, we feel fortunate to have located to our neighborhood in what has evolved into one America's Best Cities to Live In over the years thanks to visionaries, like yourselves, for the community. Although Baker Road has taken a natural (heavy-usage) erosion beating over the 13 years that we have depended on it 1 day-in and day-out and is obviously in need of a resurface, we question this proposed desire to convert this busy North- South Road between two heavy traveled East-West routes (62 and Valley View) into, in essence, a two lane road with turn lane to apparently appeal to bicyclist who find it inconvenient to use the wide path currently available on the east side of the road. (How many people are truly biking and or walking on Baker between December and March in any given year?) Perhaps we are selfish in that we use Baker every time we leave Candice Lane? Regardless, in the busy drive time weekday mornings and afternoons, there are moments now that we wait for an opening to turn north out of Candice Lane. What in the world will it be like when/if you turn it into a 2 lane road?What about the numerous emergency and law enforcement vehicles who we see regularly using Baker to get to where they are going fast?What about buses stopping to pick-up and let out school children?What if 1494 has an issue and vehicles are routed on Baker? Our wish and desire, as Eden Prairie/Hennepin County residents and taxpayers, would be to kindly resurface the road to its smooth 1998 condition and keep it as a very useful 4 lane road for the area residents who depend upon its vehicular daily linkage to where we all most go. Thanks for listening to our opinion and for, hopefully, making the correct decision for your fellow local residents who will ultimately be impacted by your decision in this regard in the days and weeks ahead. Sincerely, Peter and Lisa Hoeper 13748 Candice Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 ph: 952-200-4046 e-mail: pjhoeper@hormel.com Notice: This communication is an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510. Its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient(s) intended by the sender of this message. This transmission and any attachments may contain proprietary, confidential, attorney-client privileged information and/or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, distribution,reliance on,or use of any of the information contained herein is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any matter and confiiiui by return email. This communication, including any attachments, may contain infoiivation that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not a named addressee, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read,print, retain a copy of or disseminate any portion of this communication without the consent of the sender and that doing so may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender via return e-mail and delete it from your system. 2 Randy Newton From: Kaitlin Horsch [khorsch@nd.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:48 PM To: GRP-AIICouncil Subject: Baker Road Resurfacing Dear City Council Members, I am a resident of the Cardinal Creek neighborhood off of Baker road. I recently heard of the plan to not only resurface the road but to convert it into a 3 lane road with bike paths on both sides. As someone who enters and exits my neighborhood during rush hours I can say from personal experience that there are many times that I have to wait a considerable amount of time before I am able to make my turn. I can only imagine that this wait time would be amplified if the traffic was funneled into only 1 lane. On top of that,this is a section of roadway that feeds into Forest Hills Elementary and is the main entrance and exit for the majority of the school buses that service this school. I can't even begin to imagine the headache that would be caused when all of those buses, with their wide turning radii, attempt to exit the school onto a 1 lane road. When snow is added to this uphill exit the headache turns into a migraine. I understand that a study was undertaken to determine the effect of the proposed 3-lane conversion, but as it was done in June and July it did not take into account the addition of the school traffic and increased activity at the Lifetime fitness at the end of the road, during the rest of the year. If such a major conversion were to take place, it would be more logical to do the study over a longer time period, especially a period that involves heavier traffic patterns before a conclusion was drawn. In addition, I question the extent of current bike traffic that justifies this plan being enacted. As I said,I travel this road daily and see only infrequent bike traffic. And is a mile and half of bike trail, with no other connection to bike trails, really reasonable? My understanding is that this plan is being brought to the August 16th meeting for discussion. I would hope as my representatives that before any such plan is considered, you would support a more detailed review on whether or not this conversion would be rational for year-round traffic patterns, not just June and July traffic patterns. Thanks for your time, Kaitlin Horsch 1 Randy Newton From: CARL.HORSCH@usbank.com Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 9:51 AM To: GRP-AllCouncil Subject: Bike Lane on Baker To whom it may concern, I am a resident of Eden Prairie and live along Baker road. I am very concerned about the proposed plan to convert Baker from two lanes to one in order to accommodate a bike lane. I makes no sense to me to have a bike lane, for a limited length, on one of the busiest streets in Eden Prairie. Is there a demand for it? Even the Lifetime facility rarely uses Baker for their Bike club because it doesn't get you to the biking paths. This change would not help that, since you would need to put the bike lanes north of 62, not south, on Baker to get to the biking trails. I believe that the change would have a serious negative effect on traffic flow in and out of the neighborhood and would present problems for the busses and teachers coming and going from Forest Hills. Please consider this my strong opposition to having a bike lane installed on Baker. CarC`tiV. 3-Cors c h, Jr. Vice President-Wealth Management Advisor THE rMfiparE CLIENT RESERVE of U.S.Bank 800 Nicollet Mall BC-MN-H16D Mpls.,MN 55402 O 612-303-4625 C 612-247-0271 F 612-303-5111 Toll Free 1-800-723-3535 Carl.Horsch@USBANK.com. cwhorsch@netsca_pe.net privateclientreserve.usbank.com U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 1 oc3 Randy Newton From: Chris Nelson [christopher.ady.nelson@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 3:34 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Re: Baker Road Thanks again for the information! Christopher A Nelson (612) 508-8593 Linkedln: http://linkd.in/bJnFDg facebook: http://bit.ly/a1 JHOh On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Randy Newton<RNewton@edenprairie.org>wrote: Thanks Chris— To briefly answer your questions the proposed plan is to convert Baker Rd to a 3-lane road as you describe. We will have graphics on the website that show this in more detail. Please note that this is our current proposal for the roadway, however a final determination on whether or not to proceed with the conversion will not occur until after Open House and the public has had a opportunity to comment on the plan. In regards to timing, Hennepin County has the mill and overlay of Baker Road scheduled for early September. They have indicated that the mill and overlay will take approximately 8 days to complete and I imagine the striping will take another day or two. Randy Randy Newton, PE, PTOE Assistant City Engineer I Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 952 949-8339 mewton@edenprairie.org i Z- 3 From: Chris Nelson [mailto:christopher.ady.nelson@mail.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 20,201 1 2:47 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Re:Baker Road Hi Randy, Thank you for the update! 5:00 works great, I can stop in on my way home from work. My main interests are: Confirm that Baker will be converted to 3 lanes (1 north, 1 south and shared left-turn lane) with a shoulder for bike traffic. The timing of the project (start date, duration, etc). I am certain I will want to plan a different route during the project. Thanks again, Chris Christopher A Nelson (612) 508-8593 Linkedln: http://linkd.in/bJnFDg facebook: http://bit.ly/a1 JHOh On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Randy Newton <RNewton@edenprairie.org>wrote: Chris— Thanks for the email and sorry for the delay in responding. The Open House is actually from 5 to 7 on August 4h. We should have the webpage for the project up by the end of day. if you have any comments on the project or any feedback you would like to provide please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks- 2 Randyc' ® 3 l3 Randy Newton, PE,PTOE Assistant City Engineer I Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 949-8339 rnewton@edenprairie.org From: Chris Nelson [mailto:christopher.ady.nelson@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,July 13,2011 9:42 AM To:Randy Newton Subject: Baker Road Hello Randy, I understand that there will be an informational Open House meeting on August 4th at 7:00 pm at Forest Hills Elementary School. I am very interested in attending this open house, I use Baker Road every day on my bike- commute. Please confirm that details for this open house. Thank you! Chris Christopher A Nelson (612) 508-8593 Linkedln: http://linkd.in/bJnFDg facebook: http://bit.ly/a1JHOh 3 CI° Randy Newton From: Nick Wollan [nicholas.wollan@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:31 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion Hi Randy, I received the notice about the conversion of Baker Road from a 4-lane to 3 lane. I will be unable to make it to the meeting on August 4th. I would like to make a suggestion to be discussed at the meeting. I have seen an increase number of bicyclist riding on the shoulders of Baker Road, since the addition of Free Wheel Bike in Eden Prairie and Life Time Fitness. The safety of these Bicyclists is very important and I would like to suggest adding a Bike Lane for these riders. It can be very dangerous for bikers to ride so close to fast moving cars. Also, Bicyclist can't ride on sidewalks due to pedestrians walking their dogs or all the runner from Life Time Fitness using the sidewalks. I hope my concerns are discussed at the meeting and Eden Prairie can help with the safety of its residents. Also, will there be right turn lanes for drivers turning into their neighborhoods? Thank you, Nick Wollan 952.456.2810 i Randy Newton From: Bob Phillips [rmphillips123@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:11 PM To: Randy Newton Cc: 'Laura Phillips'; hudsommn@comcast.net Subject: Proposed Baker Rd. Conversion Hello Randy, I just read the Notice announcing the open house to discuss/review the proposed re-striping of Baker Rd. This is a very welcome development. My wife and I raised our two children in Cardinal Creek and we always did our best to avoid any family outings that would have forced us to walk or ride on the Baker Road sidewalks. We considered it too dangerous due to the lack of a buffer zone and the high speed of the traffic. Seems like this project will go a long way toward ameliorating these concerns for everyone in the area. I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of the homeowners in Cardinal Creek and the other affected neighborhoods feel the same way. What can we do to ensure the success of this project? Is a show of force needed at the open house to demonstrate how much the local communities care about this? I'm confident that the Cardinal Creek community can be mobilized to show its support. Please let us know. Regards, Bob Phillips 6967 Sand Ridge Rd. 9529499788 1 01) Randy Newton From: Virgil Rolfsrud [vrolfsrud@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:00 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker 2 lane road Mr. Newton, Thank you for providing the notice of an open house for this project. I am greatly dismayed at this surprising change to sole arterial access out of our neighborhood. I read the information available on your project and was unable to find any justification for it. The consultants only commented on most issues as not having a great detrimental effect on traffic. But those are not positive reasons to proceed. Because there is no rationale provided we are left scratching our heads as to why this bad idea has been hatched. I have had to conclude that there has been some kind of pressure placed on the city by bikers, as they are the only special interest favored by the plan. However, this action would be totally out of proportion with the constituency that they represent. Furthermore, we have already expended more than adequate resources for their recreational pursuits. There is a sidewalk to take walkers on one side and on the other side a wide bike path with newly improved ramps at intersections to make their ride smooth. Furthermore, they are currently able to use the main road as they choose, even though they inconvenience drivers who must look out for them. Why would we have paid for nice new concrete ramps for them if we were going to give away a third of the road to them with the new striping plan? The condition of the road has been quite poor of late. It is a heavily travelled route that naturally causes wear and tear. But now you want all of that wear and tear concentrated on two lanes instead of four? Seriously? This road will be torn apart in no time now. I doubt you could find even a tiny minority of road users who would agree with your vision for these major artery. Maybe a few confused ones who go"rah, rah"for everything they are told to support. But certainly not any serious thinkers! None of the neighbors I have spoken to have any positive thoughts about this bad idea. Please get back to a sensible plan for four lanes. We certainly are overdue a new overlay of pavement. But we have not put up with the poor conditions on this road only to be further inconvenienced by a doubling of congestion and the nuisance of travelling behind the slowest, most confused drivers. Sincerely, Virgil Rolfsrud 13200 Cardinal Creek Rd Eden Prairie, MN 1 61) Randy Newton From: LBFab@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:55 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion Immediately after reading the proposed changes to Baker Road, I thought of the Seinfeld episode where Kramer changes a four lane road to a two way road to make it a "comfort cruise" for the drivers. The episode received a lot of laughs. I read the statistics that are quoted concerning the number of vehicles driving the road per day which would seem to indicate this idea is "good." I did not see any numbers indicating what it is like in snow, sleet, heavy rain, or with a driver ahead of you that brakes around every curve. This is going backwards, not forward. I know of no proposal that reduces lanes rather then increases lane and justifies it by statistics. I drive the road every work day and have done so for 11 years. It can be a difficult drive in bad weather or good weather for that matter. That is life, not statistics. Obviously, I do not think this is a good idea, it is like you want to do something to the road, so this is it. Not all learning comes from books, life plays a great role in it. Obviously, I hope this does not good through. Linda Faber 6601 Tanager Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55402 Ibfab@aol.corn i Randy Newton From: Nancy Lenhart[nlenhart@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:14 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: RE: Proposed Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Hello Mr. Newton, Question Re: Proposed Baker Road Conversion... What are the financial savings for doing this? I have not seen this addressed in any of the reports. Given budget concerns and all the time and energy spent already with studies, staff time, etc., so far all I have seen are dollars spent on something that was not needed. Why are we taking the time to do this now vs. just repaving the way it was? Also...it seems that the decision has already been made as the August 4th is an Open House and not a time for input in the planning process. I live in the Cardinal Creek Neighborhood and it would have been nice to have been given the opportunity for input much earlier in the process. This is a major safety concern entering Baker Road from my neighborhood streets. I rely on the second lane to turn left in to as there is always traffic in the other lane. And during school and winter weather, it is critical that there are two lanes in both directions unless you are going to allow us to turn into the turning lane and not be ticketed. I do not want another reason to be ticketed for raising funds. We have a bike path from 62 to Highway 5 and 212 a half mile away. I'm not sure why this is necessary for a few bicyclists vs. a majority of motorists and safety issues. Again...I question why this project was taken on now when there are budgetary issues with local and county governments. Do we have too much money that we have to find projects to do? I am a concerned Cardinal Creek Neighborhood resident that plans to attend the Open House in hopes that it will be an opportunity to discuss and not just look at plans that are already in place for implementation. Nancy Lenhart 1 Randy Newton From: cstebner@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 1:34 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Baker Road lane conversion Hi Randy, It turns out I will not be able to attend the Open House tonight but I was just wondering if you could tell me what the reason is for converting Baker Road from 4 lanes to 3. Thank you very much! Christine Stebner i GD Randy Newton 1 O"S From: randy steen [rsteen300@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:09 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: RE: Proposed Baker Road Conversion Randy, Thank you for your update. I disagree! As a citizen that lives off Baker Road, I use it everyday and find this change to be something that will drive down my house value as the road change will effect the sale of my home. Randy Steen From: RNewton@edenprairie.orq To: rsteen300@hotmail.com Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:13:40 -0500 Subject: RE: Proposed Baker Road Conversion Mr. and Ms.Steen— As noted previously I will add your feedback to our list of comments. Also, I would like to take this opportunity to respond to your concerns about speed and increase in accidents. First, 3-lane roadways are actually shown to have a safer accident record than 4-lane roadways. The primary reason for this is because 3-lane roadways provide dedicated left turn lanes which are not provided with 4-lane roadways. As a result we would not expect any increase in accidents with this conversion. Secondly,we also would not expect an increase in speeding. Since through traffic will be placed in a single lane this will eliminate passing opportunities. Although this inability to pass slower moving vehicles may be a frustration to some drivers it will it will also provide a measure of speed control as it will not provide the opportunity for more aggressive drivers to zig-zag through traffic and will limit their opportunities to speed. Thank you again for your feedback. Randy Randy Newton, PE, PTOE Assistant City Engineer ( Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 949-8339 rnewton@edenprairie.org From: randy steen [mailto:rsteen300@hotmail.coml Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 4:11 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: RE: Proposed Baker Road Conversion 1 c\__c_\) Dear Mr Newton, 2 C� (` 3 Thank you for the update and traffic patterns during peak times are the main cause for concern. The potential to `speed is another concern as well as the increase of accidents. We remain opposed to the change to the 3 lanes. Randy and Kathy Steen From: RNewton@edenprairie.orq To: rsteen300@hotmail.com Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:57:28 -0500 Subject: RE: Proposed Baker Road Conversion Ms. Steen— Thank you for your feedback, I will add it to our list of comments. In your email you note that this conversion will compromise the flow of traffic. Please note that given the current and projected traffic volumes on Baker Road we do not expect any noticeable travel time differences for vehicular traffic with the proposed conversion. In other words vehicular traffic will not be negatively affected by this project. The traffic volumes on Baker Road are well within the range that a 3-lane roadway can effectively operate. If you would like to see additional information on the project including the traffic report please visit the project page on the City website: http://www.edenprairie.org/vCurrent/stage/article.asp?r=8633 Feel free to contact me at 952 949-8339 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this further. Randy Randy Newton, PE, PTOE Assistant City Engineer I Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 949-8339 rnewton@edenprairie.org From: randy steen [mailto:rsteen300@hotmail.coml � Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:45 AM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion Dear Randy: In response to the proposed Baker Road conversion from four-lanes to three-lanes, my husband and I would like to voice our opposition to this proposal. It would compromise the flow of traffic for us as residents of Arbor Glen. Baker Road is heavily traveled, so it would be difficult for us to turn left(south) with only one line to accommodate this. We are unable to attend the meeting because of our work schedules. Please accept this as our input to this proposal. Thank you, 2 Kathy Steen 7153 Arbor Glen Drive CC Eden Prairie, MN 55346 3 oc Randy Newton From: Phil Simon [aloharep@gmail.com] Sent: Friday,August 05, 2011 9:40 AM To: Randy Newton Subject: Re: Proposed Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Mr.Newton, Based on what I've heard about your "Open House", the decision to change Baker Road was made before the meeting. If that is the case, your July 29, 2011 response to me is a lie. When you do this work please tell me how anyone will be able to get into or out of our neighborhood. There is only one way to get to Pinnacle and that is from Baker Road. Are you suggesting that everyone living here move out of their homes while this work is done? Aside from that I am more convinced that this project is a bad idea. Sincerely, Phil Simon Sent from my iPad On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Randy Newton<RNewton@edenprairie.org>wrote: Mr. Simon— Thank you for your feedback, I will add it to our list of comments. We are proposing the conversion of Baker Road to a 3-lane roadway, however a final decision on whether or not to proceed with the project will not occur until after Open House. Based on the comments in your email it appears that you are concerned that this conversion will negatively affect access to your home. Please note that given the current and projected traffic volumes on Baker Road we do not expect any noticeable travel time differences for vehicular traffic with the proposed conversion. The traffic volumes on Baker Road are well within the range that a 3-lane roadway can effectively operate. If you would like to see additional information on the project including the traffic report please visit the project page on the City website: http://www.edenprairie.org/vCurrent/stage/article.asp?r=8633 1 3 Feel free to contact me at 952 949-8339 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this further. Randy Randy Newton, PE, PTOE Assistant City Engineer I Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 949-8339 rnewton@edenprairie.org From: Phil Simon [mailto:aloharep(&gmail.com1 Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 2:26 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Dear Mr.Newton, We received your letter about this proposed conversion to Baker Road. I will not be able to attend because I'll be out of town on a business trip. Based on the timing explained in your letter I can only assume that the decision has been made and that your meeting has been scheduled only to attempt to calm some angry residents. Baker Road is our only way in and out of our neighborhood. Please add my name to those that think the conversion is a bad idea. 2 6) -3 (7.c 3 Sincerely, Phil Simon 13305 Holasek Lane Eden Prairie,MN 55346 3 Randy Newton From: Sandra Luker[sluker@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,August 05, 2011 4:54 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Baker Road I am writing in support of the proposed changes to Baker Road. I support what is being presented. I feel that it will improve the safety of the road. I know of two accidents that could have been prevented had these plans been in place. Sandy Luker 13498 Woodmere Circle Eden Prairie, MN 55346 1 Randy Newton From: Kara Bancroft[karabancroft@hotmail.corn] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 12:57 AM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Road Conversion-Yeah and Concerns Dear Randy, I was unable to attend the open house this week, but have checked out the information on the city's website and would like to express my support of this project. As a recreational bike rider, bike commuter, and runner who lives just off Baker Road, I am extremely excited about this project! Despite Baker Road being a main bike access road for me, I typically avoid Baker Road due to the lack of a shoulder. I am so excited to hear about the possible conversion. I agree with the study that the vast majority of Baker Road is built to a much higher carrying capacity than necessary. However, I have some great concerns about the three lane section continuing north past Pinnacle Drive. I enter Baker Road on work mornings by turning left out of St. Johns Drive onto Baker Road. Especially when I bike, but even when I drive, things can be a little sketchy in the mornings due to heavy traffic coming quickly up and around a curve from the south on Baker Road, heavy traffic coming into Lifetime Fitness from 62/Baker, and a frequently backed up right turn lane (from Baker Road to 62 E). Despite the dedicated lane for driving onto 62 E, most people wait until the traffic light changes to enter 62 E (highly frustrating, but true), creating a right turn lane that can often back up past the entrance to Lifetime Fitness. I am highly concerned that with just one lane, carrying the same number of cars as the two lanes carried through this section (roughly 670/hr northbound and about 400 cars/hr southbound in AM peak hour) it may be difficult for me and the residents of the 123 other homes in St. John's Woods to make a left turn onto Baker Road from St. John's Drive during rush hour. Please keep in mind that this is the only exit for our development. My concern increases further when I think of winter driving conditions and the limited visibility we have due to the snowpiles that flank St. John's Drive's intersection with Baker Road. There is just so much going on in this several block section of Baker Road and so much more traffic and turning than in all other parts of the proposed conversion, I would strongly advise maintaining the four lane structure and moving the transition zone back to near Pinnacle Drive. Thank you in advance for taking the time to consider my concerns. I would be happy to talk with you further about these concerns if you have any questions. If you are not the contact person for this project, or if my comments would be better addressed to someone else, please let me know. Thank you, Kara Bancroft 6309 St. John's Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 (952)294-0940 1 CO" 102 Randy Newton From: pamguttman@gmail.com on behalf of Pam Guttman [pam@pgoptions.com] Sent: Tuesday,August 09, 2011 10:25 AM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Randy, My husband and I were unable to attend last week's meeting due to prior commitments. Here are our comments. We welcome the repaving as it definitely needs to be done. It's the lane changes we're concerned about. We are frustrated by the plan to change the road to this new configuration. Having lived in the Cardinal Creek neighborhood for 16 years,we've seen the traffic increase significantly over the years, although still below the capacitiy your data suggests the road can accomodate. With Baker Road being our only outlet to leave home, the change seems to be an unneccesary one, without an overwhelming relevant reason to do so. Why fix something that isn't broken? We are very aware of the need to improve bike and pedestrian safety all over. My husband is an avid biker, riding well over 3000 miles annually. He utilizes the city and county trails and has commented about lack of driver awareness when it comes to bikers. But it's not those drivers on Baker Road he's commenting on. It's usually in an intersection where a driver is turning and doesn't look for others around. It's not on the 3 mile stretch between Valley View and Cty Rd 62. Our concerns with your changes are many. While your study says the average speed limit is 43 mph,we fear the reduction to one lane in each direction will affect this dynamic. I don't anticipate drivers slowing down with this change. My guess is the speed will maintain, making it more difficult for accessing Baker Road without a lane for us to turn on to as we're exiting Sand Ridge Road or Cardinal Creek Road. I know trying to access Baker Road at peak traffic times is challenging due to the hills and curves of Baker Road. Visibility is then impaired with the addition of snow during nine months of the year or long vegetation the other times of the year. Additionally, reducing the lanes will in essence, remove a right turn lane for anyone turning off Baker Road on to any of the side streets along this 3 mile stretch. This includes access to Forest Hills Elementary. Drivers constantly move to another lane to accomodate traffic both turning from Baker to a residential street or entering from one of the residential streets. We would lose this with your plan. I understand you'll have left turn lanes, but removing these lanes would also back up traffic, especially during rush hour and school hours as people are moving along Baker Road. Are there any plans to wait and possibly create a temporary scenario replicating this change when school starts in September? How about using cones and monitoring traffic flow for a month from 6am until 8pm? This would account for rush hour traffic, before school, lunch hour, after school, afternoon rush hour and also evening activity traffic. Has consideration been given to changing the speed limit regardless of lane configuration? I know reducing the speed limit with fewer lanes could also create similar traffic issues to those going west on their way to EPHS or home during rush hour on Valley View Road near Cty Rd 4. i G -C Since there are no pedestrian crossings along this three mile stretch, how about creating boulevards with trees, rain gardens and grading it to either encourage or discourage pedestrian and bicycle crossing? Unfortunately crossing Baker Road is a very difficult action to complete and this is done many times outside of the tunnel or at the Valley View or 62 intersections. I am sure you're looking for'green' dollars to help with any of these costs. In my opinion, creating a wider bike path isn't green enough for a city like Eden Prairie that prides itself on progressive thinking and action. In talking with my daughter who is currently working for Walsh Construction as a Civil Engineer, she had lots of great ideas how to improve this stretch of road while maintaining traffic flow. I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your plan and hope you'll take my comments into consideration when making a decision on narrowing the road. Thank you. Pam Guttman 612.308.8430 www.pgoptions.com www.nutrametrix.com 2 110 Randy Newton From: John.Zachman@sungard.com Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:59 PM To: Randy Newton Subject: Proposed Baker Rd Conversion Randy, My name is John Zachman and my home is located just south of Forrest Hills Elementary School. I frequently travel the stretch of Baker Road being considered for 3-lane conversion and would like to offer my thoughts and concerns based on my experience. What I find in the morning and evenings is that there is a consistent and fairly heavy volume of local traffic to and from the various neighborhoods to the east and west all along Baker.Traffic moving on Baker makes good use of both lanes to negotiate the congestion created by vehicles turning both left and right all along that stretch.The conversion from 4 to 3 lanes would create little value in facilitating left turns while dramatically increasing congestion as a result of slow- downs from the many right-turning vehicles. Though I 'd imagine 3 lanes would create more space for bikes, my own experience is that bike traffic is extremely light compared to commuter vehicles. I estimate that I see bikes less than once a week during the summer — and sometimes, I'm the one on the bike! I would prefer to see the occasional bike on the existing path or else given a wide berth on the shoulder rather than confound traffic flow year around. If you're taking input from residents affected by the proposed change, I would like to register my strong opposition to converting Baker Road to a 3-lane roadway. I believe the current 4-lane configuration if far superior. Very Best Regards, John Zachman 6970 Mariann Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 952.934.5543 952.221.2246 (cell) 1 NERS N❑ ESIGNERS Consulting Group,Inc. SRF No. 0117478 MEMORANDUM TO: Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. Assistant City Engineer/Traffic Engineer City of Eden Prairie FROM: Marie Cote, P.E., Principal Matthew Pacyna, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: July 20, 2011 SUBJECT: Baker Road Four-Lane to Three-Lane Conversion Study INTRODUCTION As requested, SRF Consulting Group has completed a review of the potential Baker Road (CSAH 60) four-lane to three-lane conversion in the City of Eden Prairie (see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objective of this study is to evaluate the existing Baker Road corridor from a traffic, pedestrian, bicycle, and safety perspective and determine the feasibility and impacts of restriping the corridor to a three-lane section. The following sections summarize the results of this study. DATA COLLECTION To determine the impact of a potential conversion, the existing roadway conditions were evaluated to establish a baseline for comparison. Based on this approach, the existing roadway geometry, traffic volumes, vehicular speeds, and crash history were collected. Each of the data collection components is summarized below. Geometric Characteristics Currently, Baker Road is a four-lane undivided roadway from CSAH 62 to St. Andrews Drive. The project corridor is approximately one and one-half mile in length. All intersections along the corridor have side-street stop control, with the exception of the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection, which is signalized. No dedicated turn lanes exist within the study area. There are 18 full-access intersections and driveways along the entire project corridor. The width of Baker Road is 52 feet from face-of-curb to face-of-curb. There are four travel lanes that are 12 feet each, resulting in a total of 48 feet of bituminous roadway(two feet curbs on each side). www.srfco ns ulting.corn One Carlson Parkway North,Suite 150 I Minneapolis,MN 55447-4443 1763.475.0010 Fax:763.475.2429 An Equal Opportunity Employer - - 1 y,- •r' ® r j l rc r w .i• /O Jt� ' T tom:, max•T D�� 1 1VIP , L' 4 - R Nil,if 1 . -. .. --7.%(.111k,--,4-v .1, r; - ' ii. - lt..i if„•,..„..4 .„..„ . .,. . 1-,i,"" ,,... ., .',' .,' ,-...., • .... . ... . ...,----..` .rt ' _.__. .. ., . . , :,...• Q, .1.,s, . .. ,„,,-,?.7,,-. „ -,,,-0) .r.. , . —. • •-•ty ,' , .- . , .s,.. ,. ....2.,A._:. 1 ' - is 4; —, L y • W 62nd Street • ' , rt • ya ",4 • .� — K . .• , it _ -� 3 �� .., `'� r� i sr? II .,� - , °Ed.envale Boulevard • -1, ,, Holly Road _ Project �_ J _ i` Location ,a9a, r • _t M - A . . . • 4ci• . ,~rc • S +vim -.',...!...I. ,y , -• ♦ Y Z -La M1~„ J" . Y.„' * ♦ ,�ir • • �e Roberts Drivel , :,/ • • _ ! • ` '! 1. 4 - T./ a. 1 �. e s �. . - --ems.. • _ - _ r • il • Oter ',, Jl,, . 4.. 1 ea..j;� ."�•' " • `�-"�• i. -...* ; t • l_ -if r _\\\ • ' • ._- Iro, • • �ki- � C�t f' P # ,, . J 54 -U '� 212a j • . ' Tt 1 '©- �� %^ i,. - o- r. it P1 i Project Location Consulting Group,Inc. Baker Road Four-Lane to Three-Lane Conversion Study Figure 1 City of Eden Prairie 117478 July 2011 Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 3 Baker Road includes two pedestrian facilities directly adjacent to the corridor. An eight-foot multi-purpose trail is located along the entire east side of the corridor. From Roberts Drive to CSAH 62, there is a five-foot sidewalk parallel to the west side of Baker Road. These facilities provide pedestrian and bicycle access to various destinations along the Baker Road corridor, including Forest Hills Elementary School. The existing cross section of the Baker Road corridor is shown in Figure 2. Existing West =..P a 1 ._ East ~ I 5' 12' t 12' 12' 12' 8' t Walk Thru Lane Thru Lane Thru Lane Thru Lane Trail FJ2' Roadway Width T 100' ROW(Varies) Figure 2 Traffic Volumes Existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movements were collected at the following key intersections: • Baker Road and CSAH 62 • Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard • Baker Road and Holly Road • Baker Road and Roberts Drive These intersections represent the busiest roadways within the study area. Therefore, the other intersections within the study area can be expected to operate similar or better than the key intersections identified. It should be noted that the Baker Road and Valley View Road intersection was not included in the analysis since no changes are proposed. The a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts were collected by City of Eden Prairie staff during late May/early June 2011 at all of the key intersections, with the exception of the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection. The a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts at the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection were completed by Alliant Engineering on March 2, 2010. Average daily traffic volumes were also collected along Baker Road by City of Eden Prairie staff at the following two locations along the corridor: • Between Edenvale Boulevard and Promontory Drive • Between Arbor Glen Drive and Roberts Drive Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 4 Based on the two date collection locations, the average daily traffic volume along the corridor is approximately 9,800 vehicles per day (vpd). The average daily traffic volumes were used to determine the existing corridor capacity (see Existing Corridor Capacity section). The hourly volume profile for Baker Road shown in Figure 3 indicates there are two distinct peak hours of traffic along the corridor. The a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the corridor occur at approximately 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,respectively. Existing Baker Road Hourly Volume 600 $08- AY S 2110 100 12 AM 2AM 4AM 6AM 8AM 10AM 12PM 2PM 4PM 6PM 1PM 10PM 12AM TImo of Day]Flours] Figure 3 Vehicular Speeds As part of the average daily traffic volume collection process, vehicular speed data was also collected. The posted speed limit along the corridor is 40 miles per hour. Figure 4 shows the existing speed profile along the Baker Road corridor, including the average and 85th percentile speeds along the corridor. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at which 85 percent of the vehicles along the roadway travel at or below, which is commonly used to establish the posted speed limit of a roadway. The 85th percentile speed of the corridor is 43 miles per hour. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 5 Existing Baker Road Speed Profile 1900 SOtn Percentile 5•`i,c.ccii• 39 mph , 1200 5000 n 0 V 800 y i .5G00 8 E x 400 200- 0-20 21-25 26-0 31-33 34-36 37-39 4042 A3-45 46-48 49-51 52-54 55-60 61-70 71* $per ImPhl Figure 4 Crash History A crash analysis was performed throughout the project limits for the study period of January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2010. The crash data was received from the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT). Supplemental crash data was received from Hennepin County from year 2004 through year 2008, as well as recent emergency response call information from the City of Eden Prairie for years 2010 and 2011. This supplemental information was cross- referenced with the data provided in the MnCMAT to verify the accuracy of the crash data. Table 1 summarizes the reported crashes that occurred at the key intersections and the entire corridor (from south of CSAH 62 to north of Valley View Road). Table 1 also shows the calculated intersection and segment crash rates and typical crash rates for intersections or segments with similar characteristics. The typical crash rates published from the Minnesota Department of Transportation were used for comparison purposes (MnDOT Green Sheets). Table 1 Crash Rate Summary Intersection/Segment Crashes Calculated Typical Critical Crash Rate Crash Rate* Crash Rate Baker Road and CSAH 62 18 0.80 0.6 0.89 Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard 8 0.65 0.2 0.45 Baker Road and Holly Road 3 0.26 0.2 0.46 Baker Road and Roberts Drive 2 0.18 0.2 0.46 Entire Project Corridor(All Crashes) 24 1.36 5.1 6.71 * Typical crash rates published by MnDOT. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 6 Results of the crash rate comparison indicate that all key intersections, with the exception of the Baker Road and Roberts Drive intersection have a crash rate higher than average for intersections with similar characteristics. However, a higher than average crash rate does not necessarily indicate a significant crash problem. Therefore, the critical crash rates were calculated to determine the statistical significance of the above average crash rates. If the calculated crash rate is below the critical crash rate, crashes that occurred are typically due to the random nature of crashes and not a geometric design or traffic control issue. As shown in Table 1, all calculated crash rates for the key intersections, with the exception of the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection are lower than the critical crash rates. The Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection has a crash rate higher than the critical crash rate. Of the eight crashes that occurred at this intersection, all involved driver distraction or failure to yield right-of-way. Based on field observations, there is adequate sight distance provided at the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection. Therefore, this indicates there does not appear to be a design deficiency at the intersection. From an overall corridor perspective, the calculated crash rate is well below the average crash rate for roadways with similar characteristics. PROPOSED CONVERSION As noted earlier, the existing Baker Road corridor (from CSAH 62 to St. Andrews Drive) is a four-lane undivided roadway. This corridor, maintained by Hennepin County, is scheduled for a mill and overlay in late September/early October. As part of this project, the City of Eden Prairie is proposing to restripe the newly paved roadway as a three-lane roadway (two-lane roadway with a center left-turn lane). A detailed concept of the proposed striping plan is shown in the Appendix. The center left-turn lane will vary between dedicated left-turn lanes and a shared center two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL). The only section of the Baker Road corridor that will have the shared center TWLTL is from Roberts Drive to Holly Road. The proposed typical cross section of the Baker Road corridor is shown in Figure 5. Existing West 4 _ 4 4„.) East d� ?t I;J 5' 6' 12' 12' 12' 6' 8' I Walk' Shoulder Thru Lane Center Thru Lane Shoulder Trail Left-Turn Lane 52' Roadway Width 100' ROW(Varies) Figure 5 Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 7 Depending on the final limits of the proposed conversion, the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection may or may not be impacted. No impacts are expected at the Baker Road and Valley View Road intersection. The first concept striping will match into the existing roadway striping at the north and south project limits. An additional concept was developed that carries the restriping north of CSAH 62 into the City of Minnetonka. Details of the additional concept are discussed later in the memorandum. Therefore, to determine the impacts of the proposed conversion, a detailed operations and capacity analysis was completed. The following information summarizes the impacts of the potential conversion. PROPOSED CONVERSION - EXISTING CONDITIONS Daily Volume According to traffic counts collected by the City of Eden Prairie, the existing average daily traffic volume along the Baker Road corridor is approximately 9,800 vpd. Table 2 provides a method to evaluate roadway capacity. For each facility type, the typical planning-level ADT capacity ranges are listed. These volume ranges are based upon guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual and professional engineering judgment. A range is used since the maximum capacity of any roadway design is a theoretic measure that can be affected by its functional classification, traffic peaking, access spacing, speed, and other roadway characteristics. Furthermore, to define a facility's "daily capacity", it is recommended that the top of each facility type's volume range be used. This allows for capacity improvements that can be achieved by roadway performance enhancements. Table 2 Planning-Level Roadway Capacities by Facility Type Facility Type Daily Capacity Ranges (AADT) Two-lane undivided urban 8,000 - 10,000 _ Two-lane undivided rural 14,000 - 15,000 [Three-lane urban(two-lane divided with turn lanes) 14,000 - 17,000 Four-lane undivided urban 18,000 -22,000 Five-lane urban(four-lane divided with turn lanes) 28,000- 32,000 Four-lane divided rural 35,000 - 38,000 *Derived from the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Comparing the existing average daily traffic volume (9,800 vpd) along the corridor and the data presented in Table 2, the existing four-lane undivided roadway provides sufficient capacity to accommodate current traffic volumes. Furthermore, if the Baker Road corridor is converted to a three-lane roadway, which has a planning level roadway capacity of approximately 17,000 vpd, there will continue to be sufficient capacity to accommodate the existing traffic volumes. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 8 Intersection Operations Comparison To establish a baseline of the key intersection operations, an a.m. and p.m. peak hour intersection capacity analysis was completed. This analysis was used to compare the operational impacts of the existing four-lane undivided roadway versus the potential three-lane roadway configuration. The operations analysis was conducted using a combination of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Synchro/SimTraffic software (version 7). The existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes shown in Figure 6 were used for the operations analysis. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates how well an intersection is operating. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. In the Twin Cities metropolitan area, overall intersection LOS A through D is generally considered acceptable by drivers. For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the minor approach. Traffic operations at unsignalized intersections with side-street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support those volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches in most cases. Results of the existing operations analysis shown in Table 3 indicate that all key intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing traffic control. All side-street delays are considered acceptable and do not require mitigation. With the existing three-lane geometric layout, all key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing traffic control. Side-street delays will increase at the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection, while all other intersections will remain relatively similar. It should be noted that the increase in side-street delay is considered acceptable and does not require mitigation. Therefore, from an operations perspective, the potential three-lane conversion of Baker Road will continue to provide adequate intersection capacity under existing peak hour conditions and does not require additional intersection improvements. Table 3 Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Comparison Level of Service Results Peak Hour Level-of-Service and Delays(1) Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M.Peak Hour 4-Lane 3-Lane 4-Lane _ 3-Lane _ Baker Road and CSAH 62 D (35 sec) D (36 sec) D (45 sec) D(45 sec) Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard* A/C(21 sec) A/E(38 sec) A/C (21 sec) A/D(28 sec) Baker Road and Holly Road* A/C(16 sec) A/B (14 sec) A/B (14 sec) A/B (13 sec) Baker Road and Roberts Drive * A/B (14 sec) A/B (13 sec) A/C (16 sec) A/B (14 sec) * Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. (1) For signalized intersections,the delay represents the overall intersection delay;at unsignalized intersections,the delay represents the worst side-street approach delay. „ilk. \ ;.:,.': :- \ F M X - / los,, 258(106)co � 455(1428) _-.... 1 ti-) _ s ~I 209(454) • 7, . i 4 TH 62 \ r.N I— • ' (51) 51 co N li(6,800) --� co LO N (111) 59 to - Edenvale Blvd t 11 m o • 7 s '` (55) 61 I s r T •w treet 0 I _{ r t / L - I f r a LC-3[ri - �•”- �`' .r A.. + r 111 .a spLr - a Fk tt t fi, J� ..tt 1� I i J Y L _ r I I {y{'4 I .-.. 4- .;� C f i '�s r 4 -CO-'CO i . .d'''7I Si M N k. Ile. ,a Boulevard (2,800) y -- > .=:"� Holly Rd. ♦ F-6e.c\ \e ' �t O. y Ate (27)50 ? F' 6$. � o f e.3 . (42)41 • 1 k ..f or , 9,920 s r . N I-folly Road-- - " -A 494 1 - ' `; co ,. , ' I 43(32) . __ " ' 2 ` .. • f' l ` t ,k- • . - Roberts Dr. + - 0 - F y. Co NCO y. . - . ,-A.. 9,880 •, • Ps rG i � j W I �'_ �` o'er. • �, �,• LEGEND --- - , LL 1 XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes _ 4 f LL (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes r '' 'f t�f+ C ' -` CO 19 - Signalized Intersection r• " ' -C' ',` ,,�/ ♦ '+ ` ' 0 - Side-Street Stop Control Intersection ... \ -' ry X,XXX - Average Daily Traffic Volume ` "� f i'" , (Data collected by City Staff during June 2011) I ' ,c r (X,XXX) - Average Daily Traffic Volume r i "--`" 1f - (Data from MnDOT 2009 Flow Map) w . y I ,, , •.r>:_ _J i gall ti 1 Existing Conditions Consulting Group,Inc. Baker Road Four-Lane to Three-Lane Conversion Study Figure 6 City of Eden Prairie 117478 July 2011 Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 10 Since side-street operations and delays at the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection will be most impacted by the four-lane to three-lane conversion, additional details of the specific impacts to Edenvale Boulevard include: • The LOS and delays shown in Table 3 represent the worst 15-minute period during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and were developed using the HCM o These delays are not expected to occur for the entire a.m. and p.m. peak hours o The HCM provides an independent (i.e. does not take into account the impacts of adjacent intersections) analysis of the intersection operations • The average peak hour delays were developed using the SimTraffic software which takes into account the interaction between adjacent intersections, including traffic signal impacts o On average, eastbound vehicles along Edenvale Boulevard will experience an increase of approximately five seconds during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours due to the proposed conversion(from approximately 15 seconds to approximately 20 seconds) • During off peak periods, minimal impact to side-street delays along Edenvale Boulevard are expected Based on discussion with City staff, there are concerns regarding the Baker Road and Holly Road intersection operations during the morning and afternoon Forest Hills Elementary School peak periods. Therefore an additional review of the existing morning and afternoon school peak periods was completed, including the impacts of the four-lane to three-lane conversion. The following information summarizes the Holly Road/school impacts: • The school hours of operation are from 8:40 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., with the majority of parent/bus drop-offs occurring between 8:15 a.m. and 8:40 a.m. • The morning peak hour of the school, which represents the worst-case for the Baker Road and Holly Road intersection coincides with the a.m. peak hour along Baker Road • Observations indicate heavy delays and queuing during the peak 15-minute morning drop-off period along Holly Road, however after school begins, the delays and queues quickly dissipate • The afternoon peak period for pick-ups at the school is from 2:45 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. • Observations during the afternoon peak period indicate less delays and queues than the morning peak period o This is likely due to the afternoon peak period being outside of the p.m. peak hour along Baker Road • The conversion of Baker Road from a four-lane to three-lane roadway will have minimal impact to the Holly Road intersection operations o Side-street delays along Holly Road during the morning and afternoon school peak periods will remain relatively similar Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 11 Arterial Travel Time/Speed Comparison To provide an understanding of the travel time and speed impacts associated with modifying Baker Road from a four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway, an arterial analysis was completed. This analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic to provide a comparison between the two roadway configurations. The travel time and average arterial speeds for the four-lane and three-lane roadway sections are shown in Table 4. It should be noted that travel time runs and arterial speeds were calculated for Baker Road from south of St. Andrews Drive to north of CSAH 62. The results take into account the estimated intersection delays, as well as the travel time between intersections. Table 4 Existing Arterial Travel Time and Speed Comparison Travel Time Arterial Direction A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour _ 4-Lane 3-Lane 4-Lane 3-Lane Northbound Baker Road 225 sec 231 sec 192 sec 199 sec _ Southbound Baker Road 232 sec 235 sec 231 sec 238 sec M• m • i Arterial Speed Arterial Direction A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 4-Lane 3-Lane 4-Lane _ 3-Lane _ Northbound Baker Road 28 mph 27 mph 32 mph _ 31 mph Southbound Baker Road 28 mph 27 mph 28 mph 27 mph Results of the travel and arterial speed comparison indicate that the conversion to a three-lane roadway will have minimal impact to corridor travel times and average speeds. On average, existing corridor travel times will increase by approximately five seconds. Average arterial speeds will decrease by approximately one mile per hour. In addition to the Synchro/SimTraffic analysis, before and after studies of four-lane to three-lane conversions for other communities in the Metropolitan area has resulted in a slight reduction of vehicle speeds. With only one through lane in each direction, motorists do not have a second lane to move around a slower moving vehicle, thus slightly decreasing the average speeds. TRAFFIC FORECASTS To determine if the proposed conversion will be able to accommodate anticipated area growth, year 2030 traffic forecasts were developed. The year 2030 forecasts were developed by applying an annual growth rate of one-half percent growth per year to the existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour and daily traffic volumes. The growth percentage was determined by comparing the existing and future year 2030 average daily traffic volumes along Baker Road shown in the City of Eden Prairie Transportation Plan. Year 2030 a.m. and p.m. peak hour and daily traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. ' .a V ' ~500(1570) ,.,,.. } 1-t.E. r { ' 1, ~230(500) , _ ,I- o / f 755i071 60 60 I� O o , (530)1580 o o n �%- . . y *� o v ... _ (125) 65Z °° .- `n fix%; - '1F J K N �� l3t!'ll ' �9 Edenvale Blvd. . d a.7 f ..�p Y.f`.` (85)170 j ? VV'67rt�Street i` t CO . (75) 70 4)I _ w� i__-'-r `` I -�.. 4 c`Do ,• �' �� T die. .311 i �1r� ' d { a K O ,Ti - �wlY i ,+: _ - fib _t' `' ry I i ., i ., .. F6. ^'¢r>0 _ Amy' '+�7�.11. / rr: _ �k~ ! c� , 4: ' o • O fe. /, is"a r, n tiilio N �a\e. Boulevard 3,100 _ �: 1. ,W • deg` '. '` - 41i'R Holly Rd. 9 � via A � 0. ..• . '..7• _ a . _ ..._,,..t,......, .: .... :it t .... , a i ,i (50)45 I t' iJy-- -T,'+t 10,900ks .r*,t •► ri!'e' 1,-E/Fr' R' ..1- lr, - *r' r 4 P '`,..-1. !` p 1 ` IRq. • 'I P " ' ► 'r - Holly-toad - 7c, ,, ' 49-4 ' ' _ ' X la r CON 45(45) ^ .t. i 1g / '. r 14 50(35) 4,. , it, Roberts Dr. •` , - , - cu o 10,900 2". P- ,t i ^1yf ,.. .. �. 1,500 ; , :, 1 sae , . E 1-, ;` SAP `-" ;I-, -' 2 o co �:• +`dirt.. •-+~0.011.4' yv i i'� �� `a.:'• �e a - �;i _ 1 1 LEGEND / - XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes �•° a ""F + (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes F ..� ` err . ` ` -,li 9 - Signalized Intersection i �. .' ' Q - Side-Street Stop Control Intersection , r f + �,_ g - X,XXX - 2030 Average Daily Traffic Volume ,,. K. r Y x I y" _ —. ittig Year 2030 Conditions Consulting Group,lnc. Baker Road Four-Lane to Three-Lane Conversion Study Figure 7 City of Eden Prairie 117478 July 2011 Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 13 PROPOSED CONVERSION - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Daily Volume Based on the year 2030 traffic forecast provided in the City of Eden Prairie Transportation Plan, the Baker Road corridor is expected to have an average daily traffic volume of 10,900 vpd. Comparing the future year 2030 average daily traffic volume (10,900 vpd) along the corridor and the data presented in Table 2, the existing four-lane undivided roadway will provide sufficient capacity to accommodate future year 2030 traffic volumes. Furthermore, if the Baker Road corridor is converted to a three-lane roadway, which has a planning level roadway capacity of approximately 17,000 vehicles per day, there will continue to be sufficient capacity to accommodate year 2030 traffic volumes. Intersection Operations Comparison This analysis was used to compare the operational impacts of the existing four-lane undivided roadway and the potential three-lane roadway configuration under year 2030 conditions. Results of the year 2030 operations analysis shown in Table 5 indicate that all key intersections will operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing traffic control and the four-lane undivided roadway section. All side-street delays are considered acceptable and do not require mitigation. Table 5 Year 2030 Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Comparison Level of Service Results Peak Hour Level-of-Service and Delays(1) Intersection A.M. Peak Hour _ P.M.Peak Hour 4-Lane 3-Lane 4-Lane 3-Lane Baker Road and CSAH 62 D (51 sec) D (50 sec) D (52 sec) D (52 sec) Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard* A/D(28 sec) B/F (66 sec) A/D (27 sec)_ A/E(38 sec) Baker Road and Holly Road* A/C(19 sec) A/C(15 sec) A/C (16 sec) A/B (14 sec) Baker Road and Roberts Drive * A/C (15 sec) A/B (14 sec) A/C (17 sec) A/C (15 sec) * Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control. The overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. (1) For signalized intersections,the delay represents the overall intersection delay;at unsignalized intersections,the delay represents the worst side-street approach delay. With the three-lane roadway section for year 2030, all key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with existing traffic control. Side-street delays will increase at the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection, while all other intersections will remain relatively similar. It should be noted that the increase in side-street delay is considered acceptable and does not require mitigation. However, this intersection should continue to be monitored to determine if operational problems begin to develop in the future. Therefore, from an operations perspective, the potential three-lane conversion of Baker Road will provide adequate intersection capacity under year 2030 peak hour conditions and does not require additional intersection improvements. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 14 Similar to the existing conditions, the year 2030 side-street operations and delays at the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection will be most impacted by the four-lane to three-lane conversion. Therefore, additional details of the specific year 2030 impacts to Edenvale Boulevard include: • The LOS and delays shown in Table 5 represent the worst 15-minute period during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and were developed using the HCM o These delays are not expected to occur for the entire a.m. and p.m. peak hours o The HCM provides an independent (i.e. does not take into account the impacts of adjacent intersections) analysis of the intersection operations • The average peak hour delays were developed using the SimTraffic software which takes into account the interaction between adjacent intersections, including traffic signal impacts o On average, eastbound vehicles along Edenvale Boulevard will experience an increase of approximately five seconds during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours due to the proposed conversion(from approximately 20 seconds to approximately 25 seconds) • During off peak periods, minimal impact to side-street delays along Edenvale Boulevard are expected • If future unforeseen growth along the Baker Road corridor occurs and side-street delays at Edenvale Boulevard become unacceptable, potential mitigation includes installation of a traffic signal, roundabout, or other roadway modifications o Regardless of whether the Baker Road corridor is a four-lane or three-lane roadway, mitigation may be necessary in the future at the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection o The three-lane roadway does slightly increase the possibility of the need for mitigation Arterial Travel Time/Speed Comparison To provide an understanding of the year 2030 travel time and speed impacts associated with modifying Baker Road from a four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway, an arterial analysis was completed. The year 2030 travel time and average arterial speeds for the four-lane and three-lane roadway sections are shown in Table 6. It should be noted that travel time runs and arterial speeds were calculated for Baker Road from south of St. Andrews Drive to north of CSAH 62. The results take into account the estimated intersection delays, as well as the travel time between intersections. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 15 Table 6 Year 2030 Arterial Travel Time and Speed Comparison Travel Time Arterial Direction A.M. Peak Hour P.M.Peak Hour 4-Lane 3-Lane 4-Lane 3-Lane Northbound Baker Road 280 sec 290 sec 195 sec 205 sec Southbound Baker Road 235 sec 240 sec 235 sec 240 sec Arterial Speed Arterial Direction A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 4-Lane 3-Lane 4-Lane 3-Lane Northbound Baker Road 22 mph 22 mph 32 mph 31 mph Southbound Baker Road I 28 mph 27 mph 28 mph 27 mph Results of the travel and arterial speed comparison indicate that the conversion to a three-lane roadway will have minimal impact to corridor travel times and average speeds. On average, existing corridor travel times will increase by approximately five to ten seconds under year 2030 conditions. Average arterial speeds will decrease by approximately one mile per hour. Pros and Cons Based on the capacity, operations, travel time, and speed analysis, the following pros and cons were developed to help identify the impacts of a potential conversion from a four-lane undivided roadway to a three-lane roadway: Pros • The planning-level capacity of a three-lane roadway section is approximately 17,000 vpd, which can accommodate the existing and future average daily traffic volumes of 9,800 vpd and 10,900 vpd, respectively • Existing and future year 2030 overall peak hour intersection operations, with the exception of the Baker Road and Edenvale Boulevard intersection, are maintained and any increase in side-street delay is considered minimal and does not require mitigation • The increase in overall corridor travel time and the reduction in average travel speeds will be minimal • Provides a more complete street (i.e. a better use of the space for all modes of transportation) • The shoulder area will act as an on-road bicycle facility • Provides a buffer between vehicles and pedestrians/bicyclists • Improved vehicular and pedestrian safety through: o Shorter crossing distance (less travel lanes to cross) o Can utilize the shoulder as an on-street bike lane o Provides dedicated left-turn lanes, minimizing conflicts between through and left- turning vehicles Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 16 Cons • Increased side-street delays at Edenvale Boulevard o May require mitigation • Loss of passing opportunities • Potential driver confusion with center left-turn lane • Unused space is potential sand/debris collector ALTERNATIVE TRANSITION As mentioned earlier, an additional concept was developed that extends the restriping to the north of CSAH 62 into the City of Minnetonka. A detailed concept of the alternative striping plan is shown in the Appendix. The goal of the additional concept is to provide more efficient and flexible signal timing operations by changing the signal timing from split phasing to protective-permissive left-turn phasing. The following sections summarize the proposed concept and impacts associated with the conversion. It should be noted that the focus of the additional analysis is on the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection. Geometric Impacts The goal of the additional concept from a geometric perspective is to modify the lane designations from a shared left/through lane and a through lane to a dedicated left-turn lane and a through lane (for the northbound and southbound directions). This will allow for the left-turn lanes to be aligned across from one another, creating an opportunity to change the signal phasing to protective-permissive from the existing split phasing. To properly align the left-turn lanes and through lanes, a median (striped or raised) should be considered. The raised median would provide a better delineation of travel lanes, especially during winter conditions when the striping can be covered by snow/ice. However, a striped median (with a cross hatch) pattern can serve a similar function and provides additional flexibility for truck turning movements. An additional change to the existing roadway configuration will be a single lane leaving the intersection. However, north of CSAH 62, the striping will quickly (with approximately 350 feet) taper back into the existing roadway. Details of the impacts of these changes are discussed in the Operational Impacts section of this memorandum. Signal Timing Changes Currently, the northbound and southbound approaches of the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection operate with split phasing. Split phasing in this location generally provides adequate signal timing operations during peak hour operations. However, it often does not operate as well during off-peak periods. Installation of split phasing is typically avoided, if possible. Therefore, the additional alternative was developed to determine if a protective-permissive left-turn phasing would be more appropriate. Therefore, a detailed operations analysis was completed to determine the impacts of the protective-permissive left-turn phasing. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 17 Peak Hour Operational Impacts This analysis was used to compare the operational impacts of the existing split phasing signal timing to the potential protective-permissive left-turn signal timing under year 2030 conditions. The year 2030 conditions (a.m. and p.m. peak hours) were reviewed, since they represent the worst-case scenario along the corridor. Results of the year 2030 operations comparison shown in Table 7 indicate that the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection will operate better under the protective-permissive left-turn phasing alternative during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In general, the northbound and southbound approaches will improve, incurring less delay. Furthermore, queuing under both scenarios will remain relatively similar. Table 7 Year 2030 Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Comparison Level of Service Results Peak Hour Level-of-Service and Delays A.M. Peak Hour P.M.Peak Hour Baker Road and CSAH 62 PROT- PROT- SPLIT PEA SPLIT PERM Overall Intersection D(50 sec) D (45 sec) D (52 sec) D(49 sec) _ Northbound(Eden Prairie) D(42 sec) _ C(25 sec) D (37 sec) C (27 sec) Southbound(Minnetonka) E(68 sec) E(67 sec) E(59 sec) D(54 sec) 95th Percentile Queuing Baker Road and CSAH 62 A.M. Peak Hour P.M.Peak Hour PROT- PROT- SPLIT PERM SPLIT PERM Northbound(Eden Prairie) 270 feet 280 feet 220 feet 220 feet Southbound(Minnetonka) 235 feet 225 feet 350 feet 340 feet Off Peak Operation Impacts This analysis was used to compare the operational impacts of the existing split phasing signal timing to the potential protective-permissive left-turn signal timing during the existing off-peak hours. The existing off-peak hours reviewed were from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. and from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Existing turning movement counts collected by Alliant Engineering in March 2010 were used for this analysis. Results of the existing off peak operations comparison shown in Table 8 indicate that the Baker Road and CSAH 62 intersection will operate better under the protective-permissive left-turn phasing alternative during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In general, the northbound and southbound approaches will improve, incurring less delay. Furthermore, queuing under both scenarios will improve or remain relatively similar. Randy Newton, P.E., P.T.O.E. July 20, 2011 City of Eden Prairie Page 18 Table 8 Existing Off-Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Comparison Level of Service Results Peak Hour Level-of-Service and Delays 6 A.M.to 7 A.M. 12 P.M.to 1 P.M. Baker Road and CSAH 62 SPLIT PROT- SPLIT PROT- PERM PERM Overall Intersection C(23 sec) B (17 sec) C (23 sec) C(21 sec) Northbound Approach C(28 sec) C (21 sec) C (24 sec) C(22 sec) Southbound Approach E(69 sec) D (51 sec) C (34 sec) C(34 sec) 95th Percentile Queuing Baker Road and CSAH 62 6 A.M.to 7 A.M. 12 P.M.to 1 P.M. PROT- PROT- SPLIT PERM SPLIT PERM Northbound(Eden Prairie) 90 feet 85 feet 120 feet 120 feet Southbound(Minnetonka) 110 feet 80 feet 120 feet 115 feet Pros and Cons To better quantify the impacts of the additional transition alternative, the following pros and cons list of the additional alternative was developed: Pros • Protective-permissive left-turn phasing provides more signal timing flexibility than split phased signal timing • During the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under year 2030 conditions, the overall intersection operations improve by approximately three to five seconds of delay per vehicle when protective-permissive left-turn phasing is used o The northbound and southbound approach operations, including queue lengths will be maintained or improved • During the off peak hours reviewed under existing conditions, the overall intersection operations improve by approximately two to six seconds of delay per vehicle when protective-permissive left-turn phasing is used o The northbound and southbound approach operations, including queue lengths will be maintained or improved Cons • Additional implementation costs • Perception of lane reduction/less capacity H:\Proj ects\7478\TS\Report\110720_7478_Final_BakerRoadConversionTraffic Study.doc APPENDIX Baker Road MN 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Candidate _ , Preliminary Concept Review 1 MI SRF PLANNERS N ❑ £SIGNER S CunsuIUng Group,Inc. Project (Overlay) Limits - .. ./A 7 • North Termini — CSAH 62 Or South Termini — St Andrews Drive .- . 'i $ Frinn Pr.i i S • Potential Expansion Opportunities — CSAH 60 and CSAH 62 5 11 Intersection , .:::,, 1 — CSAH 60 north of CSAH 62 4qa �. : ,..„,, ...„„„..4-' 0-- i Ili ''''' Ar \ ,, ,, qENGINEERS I PLANNERS I ❑ ESIGNERS Historical Volumes • Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Volumes — Year 1999 — 11 ,000 vehicles per day — Year 2009 — 9,800 vehicles per day — Year 2030 (Projected) — 10,900 vehicles per day Facility Type Daily Capacity Ranges (AADT) * OP Two-lane undivided urban 8,000 - 10,000 ilk Two-lane undivided rural 14,000 - 15,000 ree- ane ur an wo- ane divided with turn lanes) Four-lane undivided urban 18,000 - 22,000 Five-lane urban (four-lane divided with turn lanes) 28,000 - 32,000 Four-lane divided rural 35,000 - 38,000 qENGINEERS I PLANNERS I ❑ ESIGNERS Typical Section • Existing —111 Existing q West 0 _ ' - f 9 East L 5' 11 12' t 12' 12' 1 12' t • 8' i Walk Thru Lane Thru Lane Thin Lane Thru Lane Trail 52' Roadway Width _ 100' ROW(Varies) • Potential Reconfiguration Existing 1 West M•- .■ i East • 5' i 6' 12' 12' 12' 6' 1 IL 8' Walk Shoulder Thru Lane Center Thru Lane shoulder Trail Left-Turn Lane 52' Roadway Width _ 100' ROW(Varies) •il ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I ❑ ESIGNERS Pros and Cons Specific to the Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion ii Pros • Complete Street - Better Use of Space for All Modes of Transportation • Provides On-Road Bike Facility • Provides a Buffer between Vehicles and Pedestrians/Bicyclists • Traffic Calming (Speed Reduction) and Uniform Flow • Improved Vehicular and Pedestrian Safety • Timing is Right — Fresh Surface for Striping • Low Cost Implementation qENGINEERS I PLANNERS I ❑ ESIGNERS Pros and Cons Specific to the Baker Road 4-Lane to 3-Lane Conversion Cons • Potential Increase in Side-Street/Driveway Delays • Loss of Passing Opportunities • Potential Driver Confusion with Center Left-Turn Lane • Unused Space is Potential Sand/Debris Collector •� ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I ❑ ESIGNERS Schedule • Conceptual Review of Corridor (June) • Plan Refinement and Traffic Analysis (June/July) • Mailed Notices (July) • Open House (August) • City Council Meeting (August) • Implementation (September) •� ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I ❑ ESIGNERS August 11,2011 To: Eden Prairie City Council : From: Joanne Slavin, 8698 Grier L. .en Prairie,MN 55344 LABv in a i, nil.CdU Re: Baker Road.project Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the Baker Road project. I have lived in Eden Prairie since 1986 and work at the University of Minnesota. I make good use of SW transit,my car,and my bike for getting to my job at the University. Additionally,I ride my bicycle for recreation and have ridden on most of the roads in Eden Prairie. There are some wonderful bike trails—I particularly appreciate the new tunnel access to Staring Lake from Sunnybrook Drive. Although the bike trails are great,there is an urgent need to provide a north/south route for commuting cyclists in Eden Prairie. To get to the SW trail to ride to Hopkins,Baker Road is one of my only alternatives. I currently ride on the sidewalk as I have found many unfriendly motorists in Eden Prairie. I often continue to ride on Baker Road into Minnetonka and find that the road configuration there,one lane in each direction with a bike lane,works great for both cyclists and motorists. It appears that when motorists have 2 lanes of traffic in each direction,they tend to drive too fast. Everyone is in a hurry to get to a freeway,but they need to be more concerned with pedestrians and cyclists. Please let me know if I can provide additional support for the conversion of Baker Road to a bike-friendly configuration. As a nutritionist,I support all community efforts to improve the public health of our community. Encouraging residents to ride their bikes will make us a greener community—and might assist in efforts to fight the obesity epidemic. We may be the number one community in Money Magazine(2010),but our bike commuting routes need to elevate to that high standard. cc. Eden Prairie City Engineer Rod Rue