Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 12/05/1995
AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1995 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thonmnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra- Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM m. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 21. 1995 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 21. 1995 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. RESOLUTION AWARDING IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT FOR 1996 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS. I.C. 96-5395 C. RESOLUTION REQUESTING MnDOT TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT TH 169 AND FOUNTAIN PLACE City Council Agenda Tuesday, December 5, 1995 Page Two D. V ALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II by Design I of Edina. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan Review for Valley Place Office -Phase II and Approval of a Supplemental Developer's Agreement for Design I of Edina. Location: 9973 Valley View Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) E. RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF $1.450.000.00 IN MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVEWPMENT BONDS FOR CHALLENGE PRINTING (ROBERT LOTHENBACH PROJECT) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. VACATION 95-09: VACATE EASEMENTS OVER PART OF WT 6. BWCK 1. BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION (Resolution) B. ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION by 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation. Request for Preliminary Plat of 11.3 acres into 2 outlots and road right-of-way. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and Aztec Drive. (Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Vll. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VID. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 1. HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION AND SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD - Update on Hope Pro&ram 2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION -Herita&e Site Reco&nition Pro&ram x. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER City Council Agenda Tuesday, December 5, 1995 Page Three C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & FACILITIES 1. Recommendation re&ardin& Outdoor Recreation Grant and Status of Kline/Peterson Parcel No.1 Option D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Land Use Alternatives for Dell Road. Hi&hwya S. and Cascade Drive E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XU. OTHER BUSINESS xm. ADJOURNMENT £tem rrrA UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP TUESDAY,NOVEMrnER21,1~5 COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: I. CALL TO ORDER 6:15 P.M. CITY CENTER Heritage Room IV 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Ron Case, Nancy Tyra-Lukens, and Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Human Resources and Community Services Natalie Swaggert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities Bob Lambert, City Engineer Al Gray, and City Recorder Barbara Anderson Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Councilmember Tyra-Lukens was excused. ll. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Thorfinnson stated he had volunteered to work with staff to improve the procedures for appointing members to City Boards and Commissions. To gain an understanding of the issue, focus groups were held, comprised of staff liaisons and chairs of the established boards and commissions. A wide range of issues were discussed. As a result of these discussions, suggestions were made to improve the appointment process, operations of, and communications between boards and commissions. A three phase process was outlined. Phase 1 included a goal to establish Charter Summaries for each board and commission to outline the board or commission's function and responsibilities. The descriptions will be available to anyone who wants to apply for a board or commission. Another goal was to draft a Board and Commission Informational Brochure. A first draft of the brochure was distributed. Thorfinnson discussed the Application Form and proposed insert which would contain questions specific to a board or commission's needs. He discussed the time line for the process of selecting candidates and the steps which could be implemented to make this a timely and efficient process. This process would commence in mid-January, and be completed with candidate interviews and selections by mid-February. Candidates would be notified of their appointments by late-February, and orientation and training would be held in March. He noted that commencement of terms would be changed to April 1st, which would require a change in the City Code. The Awards Banquet will continue to be held in April, and new board and commission members will be introduced at that time. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP November 21, 1995 Page 2 Phase 2 dealt with communication between the Council and the boards and commissions and several suggestions were made to facilitate this communication. One suggestion was to have a Councilmember assigned to each board and commission to act as a liaison between that body and the Council. This would not mean that the Councilmember would have to attend every meeting of that board or commission, but rather become familiar with the members and be available for discussion of issues and concerns that the board would like to discuss with the Council. A monthly report providing timely information from each group was proposed. The report would be sent to each board and commission in addition to the Council. Another suggestion was to utilize the Report from Boards and Commissions section of the Council Agenda as an opportunity for members of a board or commission to discuss a specific issue with the Council and obtain their direction in a timely manner. Harris concurred with the suggestion to use the section of the agenda to obtain immediate feedback from the Council on specific issues concerning the various boards and commissions, and stated that general issues should be dealt with in workshops. She believed that if Councilmembers were assigned to act as liaisons between boards and commissions they should remain part of the audience and not be seated with the board or commission. Case commented he believed people should be limited to applying to two commissions at a time. He believed that the joint meetings should be held to facilitate the boards, commissions and Councilmembers working with each other. Pidcock stated she was concerned about applications becoming too restrictive and precluding the average citizen from applying or being appointed if the City Council becomes too stringent in their requirements for professional skills. Phase 3 dealt with restructuring boards and commissions to maximize effectiveness, and the flow of information to ensure appropriate recommendations are forwarded to the City Council. It was suggested that perhaps the Planning Commission should be composed of members from other boards and commissions to better facilitate communication. That would require those members to attend two additional meetings, which could become burdensome. Council directed staff to continue the process and report back to them in the future. IV. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1995 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Ronald Case, Patricia Pidcock, Ross Thorfmnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM. Tyra-Lukens was absent. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Jullie deleted item IV. D. RECEIVE PETITION AND APPROVE REOUEST FROM LECY CONSTRUCTION TO MOVE SCENIC EASEMENT LINE ON WT 6, BLOCK 1, BLUFFS WEST and added item VII. A. RESOLUTION 95-202 REOUESTING SPEED STUDy FOR CSAH 1 (PIONEER TRAIL) FROM CSAH 18 TO THE WEST CORPORATE LIMIT. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. ll. OPEN PODIUM ill. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995 MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, November 7, 1995 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 2 B. DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER by Tandem Development and Kindercare. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.75 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.75 acres, and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan Review for Dell Road and Highway 5 Commercial Center. Location: Dell Road and Highway 5. (2nd Reading of Ordinance 37-95-PUD- 17-95 for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial and Planned Unit Development District Review, and Resolution 95-197 for Site Plan Review) C. APPROVAL OF REOUEST FROM JAMES R. BAYER, TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR OF GIRLS SOFTBALL, TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO LIGHTS OUT POLICY AND PARK HOURS ORDINANCE AT MILLER PARK AND ROUND LAKE PARK AUGUST 7-11. 1996 D. RECEIVE PETITION AND APPROVE REQUEST FROM LECY CONSTRUCTION TO MOVE SCENIC EASEMENT LINE ON LOT 6, BLOCK 1. BLUFFS WEST (Item deleted) E. APPROVE HENNEPIN PARKS REQUEST TO REMOVE DEER AT BRYANT LAKE PARK F. AMENDMENT TO FEE RESOLUTION TO REVISE FEES FOR PARK SHELTER RESERVATION DURING WINTER MONTHS G. AGREEMENT TO DEMOLISH THE PALM HOUSE AT 8510 FRANLO ROAD AND ASSESS COST H. APPROVE BID FOR REPLACING DASHERBOARD SYSTEM IN RINK #1 AT EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER I. APPROVE REOUEST FROM SUPER V ALU TO SUBSTITUTE A LETTER OF CREDIT ON THEIR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND (Resolution 95-198) Regarding item B, Case asked if the neighborhood concerns regarding the left tum lane on Dell Road into Cascade have been addressed. Gray said conversation with the City of Chanhassen indicates that the southbound lanes of Dell Road will be completed this summer as part of development there. He added the right tum lane on Cascade will be completed when the westerly portion of the site is developed; however, the improvements and addition to the driveway on the residential unit to the south will be completed now. Case asked if the City would consider the Dell Road improvements if for some reason Chanhassen does not complete them this summer. Gray responded they are looking at some modifications to the median that would make the lane shift for southbound traffic much simpler. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 3 Regarding item E, Harris asked why only antlerless deer will be removed. Lambert said removing does will provide better population control. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve items A-C and E-I of the Consent Calendar with item D deleted. Motion carried unanimously. v. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS A. GLEN LAKE GOLF AND PRACTICE CENTER by Hennepin County. Request for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres. Location: Crosstown at Indian Chief Road. (Resolution 95-199 for Site Plan Review) Paul Miller, representing Williams Gill & Associates, reviewed the project. This project involves the construction of a nine-hole executive golf course and a driving range/practice area on 13.5 acres, located at County Road 62 and Indian Chief Road. Pidcock asked what the greens fees will be. Miller said they have not been established yet, but probably will be in the $8 -$15 range. Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their October 23, 1995 meeting, and recommended approval on a unanimous vote subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of October 20. He said the proposal will be reviewed by the City of Minnetonka later this month; therefore, the proponent would not be able to start any construction until the City of Minnetonka also approves the project. Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed the proposal at their November 6, 1995 meeting, and recommended approval per the October 20 Staff Report and the Supplemental Staff Report of November 1. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing; and adopt Resolution 95-199 granting Site Plan Approval for the Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center proposal by Hennepin County. Motion carried unanimously. B. EDEN HILLS CONDOMINIUMS by Brenwood Development Corporation. Request for Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into 110t and road right-of-way. Location: Fran10 Road, south of Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution 95-200 for Guide Plan Change, Ordinance for Zoning District CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 4 Change from Rural to RM-2.5 and Resolution 95-201 for Preliminary Plat) Jim Zachman, 8644 Zachman Circle, was present to answer questions. This proposal involves the construction of a three-story 36-unit condominium building on 3.3 acres, located on Franlo Road just south of Prairie Center Drive. Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their October 23, 1995 meeting, and recommended approval on a 7-0 vote subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of October 20. Lambert said the Parks Commission reviewed the proposal at their November 6, 1995 meeting, and recommended approval on a unanimous vote subject to the recommendations of the October 20 Staff Report and October 31 Supplemental Staff Report. Case asked when the house on the property will be removed. City Attorney Pauly said it was approved on tonight's Agenda and removal is scheduled for next week. Case thanked Zachman for his help with the City's historical groups and noted they still have a few items they would like to salvage from the property. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing; adopt Resolution 95-200 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres; approve the 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5; adopt Resolution 95-201 for Preliminary Plat Approval on 3.3 acres into one lot and road right-of-way; and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Case, Pidcock, Thorfmnson and Harris voting "aye." VB. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION 95-202 REOUESTING SPEED STUDY FOR CSAH 1 (PIONEER TRAIL) FROM CSAH 18 TO THE WEST CORPORATE LIMIT In response to the Council's request, Jullie said staff reviewed the speed issue on County Road 1 and prepared a resolution requesting the speed study. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 5 Pidcock asked who pays for the study. Jullie said this is a standard process and Hennepin County will pay. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to approve Resolution 95-202 requesting a speed study for CSAH 1 (Pioneer Trail) from CSAH 18 to the West Corporate Limit. Case said the Council also discussed what we would do if the study came back with the same old story as previous requests. Gray suggested that we ask for an opportunity to review the analysis with MNDoT staff to encourage them to consider sight distances and other factors. Case added he has received a lot of calls on this issue. There seem to be two main issues --safety and congestion. He asked if we have control over the light at County Road 1 and 4 as that seems to be involved in the congestion issue. Gray said the County has checked the traffic demands at that location different times of the day. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. VID. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REOUEST FROM EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Bill Hom, Chairman of the Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce, and George Bentley, Chairman of the Chamber's Transportation Committee, reviewed the Position Statement recently adopted by the Chamber regarding expansion of the Flying Cloud Airport. Bentley said the Chamber believes the best results can be achieved through cooperation between the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the City. Harris thanked the Chamber of Commerce for their interest and for their position statement, noting that the airport expansion has consumed an inordinate amount of Staff time and there are still issues that need resolution prior to the expansion of the airport. She said there has been progress made in the last five months with the Metropolitan Council and MAC in identifying issues. They are now beginning to address those issues. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to receive the report of the Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce. Case asked if we envision a time when we would do more than just receive their report. Harris said we might want to review the report with Staff. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 6 IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & FACILITIES 1. Recreation Proaram Fees Policy Lambert said the Parks Commission and Staff have been reviewing program fees, determining which programs should be subsidized, establishing a rationale for subsidizing various programs at different levels of subsidy, and reviewing the level of indirect cost used to determine the true costs of the programs. After extensive discussion, the Parks Commission asked staff to establish categories with some recommended subsidy percentages and to return to the Commission with those recommendations. After reviewing the proposed fees and categories of programs and services, the Commission recommended approval of the fee policy on a unanimous vote. Lambert reviewed the fee policy and the four levels of services recommended, as presented in the staff report of November 21, 1995. He said they would like to operate under the new policy for a year or two, and then review it to see if we are in line with what other communities charge. Pidcock asked if there is an average dollar figure on subsidies. Lambert said it varies widely depending on the program and might be $5.00 for one program and $70.00 for another. Case said it was good to see this type of budgeting process and to see some of the indirect costs being considered. He asked if they have sought advice from the Arts Commission and the Heritage Preservation Commission. Lambert replied they have talked with the staff liaisons. He noted that these are goals and guidelines. Some of the programs may take a year or two to reach the goal because we have to be very careful about how we increase fees and will need to monitor the reaction of the users. Case said it might be nice to see some hard figures on this and to have some backup a year or so from now to show actual dollars. Lambert said he would provide a breakdown in the F.Y.I. packet. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 7 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the policy for maximum subsidy levels for recreation programs, per the recommendations of the staff report of November 21, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Approve Revised Concept Plan for EntD' to Puaatm:y Creek Recreation Area Lambert said the changes requested from the three original concept plans have been consolidated into a fmal plan for the entry to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. Both the Planning Commission and the Parks Commission have reviewed the revised concept plan and have recommended approval. Lambert noted that approving this plan approves only the configuration of the pond, trail system and landscaping, and does not approve the restaurant or the land use. George Watson, representing Brauer & Associates, reviewed the concept plan. He said the restaurant will be sized to meet the parking available on the site. We need to work with the property to the south for access to the facility. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the revised Site Plan for the entry portion of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area, and to authorize the forwarding of the plan to the Watershed District Board of Directors for their approval and incorporation in the permit process for determining mitigation requirements. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Art Center Location Options Lambert reviewed the staff report of November 21, 1995, that described the various options for locating the Arts Center. He said there have been some preliminary discussions with Homart regarding future improvements to Eden Prairie Center. He also reviewed the findings of the community survey that referred to citizen interest regarding an Arts Center. Harris said she understood one of the options is no longer available. Lambert said the Riley Jacques property is probably not an acceptable option. Harris asked if staff has had dialogue with the Staring Arts group. Lambert said they have not. Harris said we are very interested in finding at least a temporary space for the group. She said there are missing pieces, including costs for using some of the spaces proposed in the staff report. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1995 Page 8 Case said he has a sense of scatteredness about this issue and suggested that we initiate a task force to focus on the short-term option for locating the Art Center, and to begin the process of finding a long-term location. This would enable us to get all the parties together and start the process moving. Pidcock and Thorfinnson agreed with Case's suggestion. Thorfinnson said he was concerned the task force would assume the task without clear direction or vision of the parameters on how to accomplish their goal. A discussion followed regarding how the task force would proceed with their study of the options and the composition of the task force. Anne Florenzano, 9470 Lakeland Terrace, said the Staring Arts group has been pursuing as many options as they could find. They have talked with Homart about open spaces at Eden Prairie Center, and consider that to be a very viable short-term possibility. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to initiate a task force composed of Council members Case and Thorfinnson, two members of the Staring Arts Board, one or two staff members, and a representative from the Arts Commission to study the short term options for an Art Center and to return to the Council with a recommendation in 60 days. Motion carried unanimously. Pidcock said she would like to add that the task force discussions include subsidy information when compared to other activities in the City. D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEWPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XID. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. DATE: CITY COUNcn.. AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR 12-5-95· DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance -Pat Solie CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST IV.A THESE LICENSES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT HEADS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LICENSED ACTIViTY. PLUMBING P & D Mechanical Contracting Co. Lake Harriet Plumbing & Heating ActioDiDiredion: 12-5-95 page 1 .. :; .' .... ;, 4:'" . , .. --.. ' DATE: 12/05195 EDEN PRA1RIE CITY COUNCn. AGENDA ITEM NO: IV.B SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5395 Engineering Division Maintenance Materials and Water Treatment Chemicals Mary Krause Overview: Bids were received on November 30, 1995 for the 1996 supply of Street Maintenance Materials and Water Treatment Chemicals. Several of the maintenance material items require a cost analysis of time, labor and equipment for hauling the material from the supplier. These cost comparisons are currently being done by the Engineering Division. The summary of bids and recommendation of awards will be hand-carried to the December 5, 1995 Council meeting and presented by the Director of Public Works. Recommendation: Accept the recommendation of the Director of Public Works and award bids. / jI, 1J. / DATE: 12/05/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: , tI·C SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C.96-5398 Engineering Division Resolution Requesting MnDOT to Enter into a Cooperative Agreement for Rodney W. Rue Construction of Traffic Signal at TH169 and Fountain Place Recommended Action: Motion to approve resolution requesting MnDOT to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for construction of traffic signals at TH169 and Fountain Place. Overview: In 1992, the City of Eden Prairie requested a traffic signal warrant study for the intersection of TH169 and Fountain Place. The results of the study indicated that three (3) signal warrants were met. At that time, MnDOT did not feel that the signal construction should be programmed . into their two-year budget and it currently is still not programmed. In addition to the volume warrants that exist at this intersection, there is currently a safety issue with left turning vehicles stacking up in the median of TH169 and creating confusion for the motorists. Primary Issues: This request, if approved by MnDOT, would begin the cooperative agreement process with further action necessary in the future. This process allows cities or counties to become the contracting agency on certain projects in order to accelerate the schedule from what MnDOT's able to provide. The contracting agency does have to pay for all preliminary engineering costs, with MnDOT sharing in the construction and contract administration costs. Fmancial Issues: This proposed signal project was one of the signal locations identified in the Tax Increment Project List. Therefore, we are recommending that the City proceed with this request and are proposing that the City's share of the project costs (estimated at $82,000), which includes construction, design and contract administration costs, be financed by the Tax Increment Fund. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING MNDOT TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT TH169 AND FOUNTAIN PLACE WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie requested a traffic signal warrant study at the intersection of TH169 and Fountain Place in 1992; WHEREAS, the signal warrant study indicated that three signal warrants were met at that time; WHEREAS, unsafe left tum maneuvers are occurring on a frequent basis; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie desires to have the traffic signals installed on a faster schedule than MnDOT is able to provide. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City hereby requests inclusion into MnDOT's Cooperative Agreement Program for the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of TH169 and Fountain Place. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 5, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 12-5-95 SECTION: 2ND READING ITEM NO. za: 0-. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger V ALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II Scott Kipp Recommended Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres; • Approve a Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres, • Approval of a Supplemental Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Supplemental Developer's Agreement ZJl."" . II. -/ VALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITmN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the zoning of the land be amended within the Office Zoning District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the zoning of the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Office Zoning District, and the legal description of land in such District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and is amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be developed in accordance with plans revised and dated November 3, 1995. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of November, 1995, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of December, 1995. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on -------------------------- nrD.. -Z VALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITmN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance amends the zoning of land located at 9973 Valley View Road within the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acre; subject to the tenns and conditions of a supplemental developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: lsI John D. Frane City Clerk PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the IslJean L. Harris Mayor -------------------- (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) IIL D.-3 Valley Place Office -Phase II Legal Description Lot 4, Block 1, Valley Place EXHIBIT A 7J£ P ,-'I VALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR VALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II BY DESIGN I OF EDINA WHEREAS, Design I of Edina have applied for Site Plan approval of Valley Place Office -Phase II on 0.67 acres for construction of a 6,400 sq. ft. office building located at 9973 Valley View Road; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its October 9, 1995, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its November 7, 1995, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Design I of Edina for the construction of an office building, based on plans revised and dated November 3, 1995, between Design I of Edina, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on December 5, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Valley Place Offices -Phase II SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of December 5, 1995, by DESIGN I OF EDINA a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Developer's Agreement between GSJ Development and the City of Eden Prairie for Valley Place Offices, dated May 14, 1981 and addendum one, dated April 5, 1983, (hereinafter the "Developer's Agreement) for that portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and depicted as the "Amended Area" in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof; WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Amendment within the Office District on 0.67 acres, and Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres for construction of a 6,400 square foot office building, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as the "Amended Area"; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. , Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of the Amended Area as follows: 1. "Developer shall develop the Amended Area of the Property in conformance with the materials dated March 5, 1981 and October 13, 1982, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 7, 1981 and November 2, 1982 respectively, and in conformance with the materials revised and dated November 3, 1995, reviewed and approved by the City Council on November 7, 1995, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the' terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the approved utility plans prior to building permit issuance. 4. CROSS PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's approval of a cross-parking and maintenance agreement for the Property. The agreement shall address access, and maintenance of parking facilities and storm water facilities. Developer shall record said cross-access parking and maintenance agreement in the Hennepin County Recorders-Registrar Office and submit evidence of recording to the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's approval of exterior material samples and colors to be used on the building on the Property. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to construct, or implement, the approved exterior materials and colors plan concurrent with building construction on the Property and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. FINAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading plan for the Property. The final grading plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading plan. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 7. FINAL ORDER NO. 95-35: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances from City Code requirements within the Office District for lot without road frontage, parking setback from a side lot line, and use of exterior materials on the Property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached II a. -7 hereto. Said approval has been granted through Final Order #95-35, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order No. 95-35. Developer agrees to file Final Order #95-35 of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals on the Property at the Hennepin County RecorderlRegistrar prior to the building permit issuance. Prior to the release of any building permit on the property, Developer agrees to provide proof of filing to the City. 8. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the wooded areas on the property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a plan depicting the construction grading limits on the property. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit, Developer shall place a construction fence at the limits of the proposed grading as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester. 9. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. Said mechanical equipment includes the gas meters, electrical conduit, and water meters in addition to standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, per City Code requirements. Developer shall implement the approved plan concurrent with building construction. If, after completion of construction of said mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in its sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen said equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to meet Code requirements. Developer acknowledges that City will not release the security provided until all such corrective measures are satisfactorily completed by Developer. 10. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining walls. Upon approval by the Chief Building Official, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, said retaining walls, as approved by the Chief Building Official, concurrent with the grading and utility construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 11. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: Developer agrees to all terms and conditions and accepts the obligations of "Developer" under the Developer's Agreement, except as inconsistent with or amended by this Supplement. .a:·O, -9 VARIANCE #95-35 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS FINAL ORDER RE: Petition of Design 1 of Edina. Ltd. ADDRESS: 9973 Valley View Road OTHERDESCRllTION: ~N~/A~ ______________________________________ ___ VARIANCE REQUEST: (1) To permit a lot without frontage on a public road (pre-existing condition), City Code requires all lots to have frontage on a public road. (2) to permit parking 0' from a side lot line. City Code requires a 10' side yard setback. (3) to permit exterior building material of 63 % redwood siding. City Code requires 75 % brick. glass or stone and not more than 25 % wood. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the me therein does hereby find and order as follows: 1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have been met. (Yes __ X __ No ____ ). 2. There are circumstances unique to the property under consideration, and granting such variances does not violate the spirit and intent of the City's Zoning and Platting Code. 3. Variance Request #95-35 is herein Granted ____ =X _____ , Denied 4. Conditions to the granting X ,denial N/A, of said variance are as follows: Recommendations of the Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 6, 1995. 5. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to the applicant by the City Clerk. 6. This order shall be effective November 9, 1995 ; however, this variance shall lapse and be of no effect unless the erection or alternatives permitted shall occur within one (1) year of the effective date unless said period of time is extended pursuant to the appropriate procedures prior to the expiration of one year from the effective date hereof. 7. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council review. BOARD N/A = Not Applicable DATED: __ ~N~o~v~e~m~b~e~r~~~~~ ______ _ BARBIJEANIBOAIF09535 [j[ f) .. -/0 DEPARTMENT: Finance CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM DESCRIPTION: Final approval of $1,450,000 I. D. R. Bonds for Challenge Printing (Robert Lothenbach) DATE: November 29, 1995 ITEM NO. IV.1. This bond was given preliminary approval at the October 3, 1995, council meeting in the amount of $3,000,000. It was contemplated at that time that the bonds would come out of the State's 1996 allocation. There are some funds available from the 1995 allocation. They will be coming to us in 1996 for the remaining amount. Action Requested: Approve the resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of$1,450,000 variable rate demand industrial development revenue bonds, series 1995. RESOLUTION NO. 95 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,450,000 VARIABLE RATE DEMAND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1995 (ROBERT LOTHENBACH PROJECT) TO FINANCE A PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Issuer"), as follows: 1. The Issuer has received a proposal from the Robert Lothenbach (the "Company") that the Issuer undertake to finance a certain Proj ect as herein described, and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1651 (the "Act"), through issuance by the Issuer of its $1,450,000 Variable Rate Demand Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 (Robert Lothenbach Project) (the "Bonds"). 2. It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 1995, between the Issuer and the Company (the "Loan Agreement"), the Issuer loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to finance the acquisition and construction of an approximately 48,160 sq. ft. addition to the existing manufacturing facility located at 7500 Golden Triangle Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Proj ect" ) which is leased by the Company to Challenge Printing, Inc. The basic payments to be made by the Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed that the Issuer assign its rights to the basic payments and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to First Trust National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee") as security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of December 1, 1995 (the "Indenture"). Payment of the Bonds is initially secured by an irrevocable Letter of Credit to be issued by Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association in favor of the Trustee in an amount equal to the principal amount of the Bonds plus a certain amount of interest thereon. The Bonds are intended to be privately placed with accredited investors by Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association (the "Placement Agent") in accordance with a Bond Placement Agreement dated as of closing among the Issuer, the Company and the Placement Agent (the "Placement Agreement") and pursuant to a Private Placement Memorandum dated as of the date of closing (the "Memorandum"). 3. Pursuant to the preliminary approval of the Issuer, forms of the following documents have been submitted to the Issuer for approval: 736772.2 (a) The Loan Agreement, (b) The Indenture, and (c) Placement Agreement. The use of the Memorandum is hereby approved, but the Issuer takes no responsibility for any of the information contained therein. 736772.2 4. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) it is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the Issuer upon the terms set forth in the Indenture; (b) the basic payments under the Loan Agreement are fixed to produce revenue sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan Agreement and Indenture also provide that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project Premises and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement and Indenture; and (c) under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.155, and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds and the interest thereon and any penalty, charge or premium, or any amounts payable thereunder, however designated, due thereunder are payable by the Issuer solely from the revenues and proceeds derived from the Loan Agreement, do not constitute a debt of the Issuer within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, are not payable from or a charge upon any funds of the Issuer other than the revenues and proceeds pledged by the Issuer to the payment thereof, and do not give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Issuer nor of any of its officers, agents, or employees, and no holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the Issuer to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or any penalty, charge or premium or any amounts payable thereunder, however designated, due thereunder, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the Issuer, and the Bonds and the interest thereon and any penalty, charge or premium, or any amounts payable thereunder, however designated, do not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Issuer and the agreement of the Issuer to perform or cause the performance of the covenants and other provisions therein referred to shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues or other funds 2 furnished for such purpose in accordance with the Loan Agreement, sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof. The provisions of this paragraph shall, for purposes of the Bonds, be controlling and shall be given full force and effect, anything else to the contrary in the Bonds notwithstanding. 5. Subject to the final approval of Issuer's counsel the forms of the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Placement Agreement and exhibits thereto are approved substantially in the form submitted. The Loan Agreement, Indenture and Placement Agreement are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the Issuer by the Mayor and the City Manager. Any other documents and certificates necessary to the transaction described above shall be executed and delivered by the appropriate Issuer officials. Copies of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein described shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in the Loan Agreement, Indenture and Placement Agreement. 6. The Issuer shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture. The offer of the Placement Agent to place the Bonds for sale to accredited investors at par plus accrued interest to the date of delivery at the interest rate or rates specified in the Indenture as of the date of issuance of the Bonds at a rate not to exceed 10% per annum is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and delivery to the Placement Agent. 7. The Mayor and City Manager and other members of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Placement Agent certified copies of all proceedings and records of the Issuer relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the Issuer as to the truth of all statements contained therein. 8. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by Issuer's counsel and the officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said officials are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the Issuer. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the Issuer herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence 736772.2 3 of the Mayor or City Manager, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed by the acting Mayor or designee of the City Manager, respectively. Adopted: December 5, 1995 Mayor Attest ________________________ __ Clerk (SEAL) 736772.2 4 DATE: 12/05/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: /I. fi SECTION: Public Hearing DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Vacation 95-09: Vacation of Easements over part of Lot 6, Block 1, Bluffs David Olson West 11th Addition Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt the resolution vacating part of the drainage and utility easement and part of the conservation/scenic easement over Lot 6, Block 1, Bluffs West 11th Addition. Overview: The property owner requests vacation of these easements to accommodate construction of a home upon this lot. City Engineering and Park staffs have determined a minimal impact to the conservation area will result from this vacation. Supporting Information: See attached v~cation drawing. II. It. 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF PART OF DRAINAGE, UTILITY AND CONSERVATION EASEMENTS OVER PART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1 BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION 01AC 95-09) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie have certain drainage, utility and conservation/scenic easements described therein as follows: See Exhibits A and B WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on December 5, 1995 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage, utility and conservation/scenic easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage, utility and conservation/scenic easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on December 5, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk JI.~, z.. I EXHIBIT A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED That part of the following described property: Lot 6, Block 1, BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDmON, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof. Which lies southwesterly of the following described line, hereinafter referred to as Line A: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence North 25 degrees 19 minutes 00 seconds West 156.10 feet; thence northwesterly 87.33 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet westerly from the northeast comer of said Lot 6, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating. And lies northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence North 32 degrees 30 minutes 42 seconds West 203.96 feet to the point of intersection of the above described Line A and the south line of the North 10.00 feet of said Lot 6, and there terminating. Except the Southeasterly 10 feet of said Lot 6. Bearings are oriented to the plat of Bluffs West 11th Addition. V.A,) I I EXHIBIT B CONSERVATION/SCENIC EASEMENT TO BE VACATED That part of the following described property: Lot 6, Block 1, BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDmON, Hennepin County Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof. Which lies southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most southerly corner of Lot 5, Block 1, Bluffs West 11th Addition; thence North 50 degrees 12 minutes 00 seconds East 48.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 25 degrees 19 minutes 00 seconds West 209.56 feet; thence northwesterly to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet west of the northeast comer thereof, as measured along said line, and there terminating. And lies northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 6; thence North 32 degrees 30 minutes 42 seconds West 203.96 feet; thence North 54 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds West 34.49 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet westerly from the northeast comer of said Lot 6, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating. Bearings are oriented to the plat of Bluffs West 11th Addition. This amends the easement described in Document Number 6029726 recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. V.,4. 'I I + --... ~---- / / EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. JJL. D DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Petition from Lecy Construction to Move Recreation and Facili~ Scenic Easement Line on Lot 6, Block 1 Bluffs West Robert A. Lambert Attached to this memorandum is a memorandum from Stuart Fox outlining the request from Lecy Construction, as well as a letter from Mark Lecy of Lecy Construction requesting the City modify the conservation easement on Lot 6, Block 1 Bluffs West 11th Addition. Also, attached to the memo is a copy of the of November 6 minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission regarding this request. RECOl\IMENDATION: City staff concur with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation to approve the request for the modified easement vacation with the stipulation that the lot line be extended in a straight line from the house until it meets the adjacent property line, eliminating the proposed triangular portion in the southeast corner, and subject to the stipulation contained in the November 2, 1995 staff memorandum. The line recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission is the solid south property line depicted in the Exhibit titled Map 2. BL:mdd Attachments: Memo from Stuart Fox Leey.mcmo/Bob2 Minutes -November 6, 1995 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Letter from Lecy Construction Map #2 • " 42 646 sq.ft. ~ti~9 -sceni.;cons~~::.~n71% of lot easement -30,080 ticn iclconserva ft Proposed seen lion -2,700 sq. • It _ 64% easement vaca tion area _ 27,380 SQ. ._ iclconserva Revised scen / V. jJ. 7 Map 2 --- .. I 4, EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 3 that while there was no ASA regulation requiring a particular starting time, coaches and teams usually practiced before the games, and were counting on having that time to warm up beforehand. If the games were scheduled earlier, it would encroach into that time, and he did not believe that the coaches and players would be too pleased with that. Jacobson inquired why the last game could not be started at 7:00 p.m. instead of 7:45 p.m. Bayer responded that they are changing the time frames for the games so that the final game will begin by 7:45 p.m. He explained that earlier times would require them to use more fields to play the tournament, which would require more expenses and maintenance, and it would become more intensive than proposed. Potter inquired why they did not just use more fields and finish the games sooner, and Bayer responded that this would incur additional costs for umpires and grooming of the playing fields, which would raise the costs of the tournament. Brown inquired if it would be possible to leave the lights on for a half hour after the last game ended so patrons would not have to leave the fields in the dark, and Bayer responded that was their intent in requesting the variance. Hilgeman commented that the lights would go out at 10:30 p.m. regardless of what time the game ended. Lambert commented that if the games end at 10:00 p.m. they will not shut the lights off immediately, but will allow the people to reach their cars before the lights are turned off. Fox suggested that perhaps it would be possible to turn off all the lights but one pole, to leave sufficient illumination until people have left the park. Kracum noted that this was during a time when school was not in session and he appreciated the concerns of the neighborhoods. Potter commented that the residents had concerns regarding traffic and parking and how this was going to be handled. Lambert commented that County Road 4 could be under construction at that time, but that would have to be dealt with if that occurred. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Koenig seconded, to recommend that the Council authorize extending the time lights could be turned off to 10:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. B. Petition from Lecv Construction to Move Scenic Easement Line on Lot 6, Block 1, Bluffs West 11th Mark Lecy, representing Lecy Construction reviewed their proposal and illustrated the proposed intrusion for the house into the drainage and conservation easement, and outlined the vacation of the easement they have requested. This area will allow the homeowner adequate area to move around the point intrusion into the easement, and will allow room for a yard area as well. l EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 4 Fox reviewed the staff report and noted staff recommended the easement be amended to allow for the construction of the proposed home. There were some issues the Commission needed to consider; one, the footprint of the house was customized to fit onto the lot in the least intrusive manner possible and preserve as many of the existing trees as possible. He noted that the majority of the understory trees would remain untouched. There was also the possibility of sliding the house sideways to bring it closer to the lot line, but that would require a variance from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Hilgeman inquired why the triangular-shaped piece of the easement located at the bottom of the lot was included in the vacation. Lecy responded that this would be used as yard space by the homeowner, since it was a flat, grassy area which would provide some activity area, and there was no mowing allowed within a conservation easement. Hilgeman inquired why the house size was not reduced to fit within the lot area and Lecy responded that it would not be approved because it did not fall into the dollar range stipulated by the restrictive covenants on the property. Most customers want spread-out ramblers with this type of view, and the proposed house was on the smaller side, and he believed was as small as they could go and still be approved by the homeowners association. Koenig inquired if there would be fill placed on the property and Lecy responded negatively, noting that extra courses of block will need to be added to place the footings below the frost level. He commented they will do everything possible to avoid encroaching into the drip line area of the oak trees. Brown inquired what the building area requirements were in the restrictive covenants for the lot, and Lecy responded that there were no square footage requirements as such. In his opinion, a smaller home would not be valued in the same range as other homes in the area. He noted that if the house was turned around on the lot it would preclude the view they are trying to save. Koenig commented she realized this was a better plan than the others, but the was concerned about the back yard syndrome, which seemed to be occurring more frequently. She appreciated that people were entitled to develop their land as they wished, but at the same time, she believed that a purchaser for the property was aware of its limitations, and should enter into the agreement with those limits in mind. If not, there would be another buyer. Hilgeman was concerned about setting a precedent if they were to approve the vacation.as proposed, and believed that the triangular part of the easement should be excluded and the lot line drawn in a straight line to the end instead of creating a lot which was even more confusing in shape. She agreed that property owners needed area to get around the house itself. Koenig agreed with Hilgeman. V,)i· 1 EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMM:ISSION November 6, 1995 Page 5 Lecy said staff had recommended that the property line be staked to avoid encroachment further than that proposed. Hilgeman responded that if they have to impact the easement it should be as little as possible, and she did not support the inclusion of the triangular portion that was proposed. Brown, concurred, and commented that he also felt it should be excluded. Lecy noted that the buyers had asked for more land and he had convinced them to move the easement back to where it was shown on the plan. MOTION: Koenig moved, seconded by Hilgeman, to approve the request for a modified easement vacation with the stipulation that the lot line be extended in a straight line from the house until it meets the adjacent property line, eliminating the triangular portion at the southeast corner of the easement, and subject to the stipulations contained in the November 2, 1995 staff memorandum. Motion carried unanimously. C. Hennepin Parks Regu ~t to Remove Deer at Bryant Lake Park Fox reviewed the staff report and stated staff recommended approval of the proposal. He noted that Lawrence Gillette from Hennepin County was not present. Hilgeman asked if the City was giving permission for the deer population to be reduced or if there would actually be a reduction done. Fox responded that there was a need to reduce deer in the Bryant Regional area but Hennepin County would be required to show need to reduce the deer population in the Anderson Lakes area. He noted that approximately 20-24 deer would be removed from this area of the City and 10 deer would come out of the Bryant Regional Park area. Bremer commented that there were many winter activities that went on in Bryant Regional Park and he was concerned about the safety of park visitors when deer reduction was occurring. Fox responded that the area would be posted and lanes of fire which dead-ended would be used, and firing would only be into hills to avoid the problem of stray gunfire. Koenig inquired if Hennepin County would only be removing anterless deer, and Fox responded that was their intent, whenever possible. Koenig inquired when this would occur and Fox responded that it would take place between mid- November through March 1, 1996. Jacobson inquired if an Eden Prairie Police Officer would be present when the sharpshooting was going on, and Fox responded that Hennepin County Parks would use their own rangers on the site. The person doing the shooting would be an employee of the Hennepin County Park Service. Jacobson inquired if the Police Department would be notified when the sharpshooting was occurring and Fox responded affirmatively. II EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~ DATE: 11/21195 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPI'ION: Petition from Lecy Construction to Vacate a Recreation and Facilities Portion of a Scenic and Conservation Easement on Lot 6, Block 1 of Stuart A. FOXC?r1F Bluffs West 11th Addition Attached is a letter from Lecy Construction to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission requesting a portion of a scenic and conservation easement be vacated to accommodate the construction of new home. The proposed two story home when using the setbacks from the road and side yard impacts approximately 10 feet of the scenic and conservation easement on this lot. (see map #2) The City when reviewing Bluffs West 9th Addition in 1990 looked at this entire area along Wild Heron Point and suggested a number of scenic conservation easements be used to preserve conservancy line indicated in the Purgatory Creek Study. The conservancy line indicated in the Purgatory Creek Study placed a line of conservation at the 800-foot contour in this area of the City. The developer in bringing forth this project was willing to work toward conserving some of the steep slopes, some of the woodland vegetation. They also dedicated several outlots to the City that contained Purgatory Creek and to accommodate cross trail access to other developments. The size house indicated on the original Bluffs West 9th Addition plan is very similar in size to the one that is being proposed by Lecy Construction. The only change is the angular nature of the garage entrance. PROPOSED CHANGE IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT: Staff met with Mark Lecy on the site, as well as surveyors for Hedlund Engineering in October. At that time, Mr. Lecy explained that there were covenants on these lots that made it imperative that he build a size and value home very similar to the houses already built up and down Wild Heron Point. This is the only vacant lot remaining on this subdivision. In previous evaluations of the site, it was suggested that a house of a more linear nature be placed on the lot; however, this would mean that several oak trees and a grouping of aspen at the rear of the lot would be taken down to accommodate such a building style. The proposed house corners were staked in the field. The staff in looking at them concurs that the proposed house would only impact a small part of the existing scenic conservation area. A summary of the lot as calculated by Hedlund Engineering is as follows: • Lot square footage 42,646 square feet. • Existing conservation easement area 30,080 square feet (71 % of lot area). • Area proposed to be vacated 2, 700 square feet. • Proposed revised scenic conservation area 27,380 square feet, which equals 64 % of the entire lot area. 1 V.A, II The staff also noticed that provisions have been made to allow for rear yard drainage to be directed toward a catch basin on the corner of Lot 5 and 6, thereby reducing or totally eliminating the amount of water that would be directed toward the steep slopes on this lot. Over the last three years staff has been called to this lot several times by potential builders to evaluate whether or not a house style would fit and whether or not they would need to petition to have the scenic and conservation easement changed. Of all the house plans reviewed by the staff, this is the least intrusive in terms of impacting the scenic and conservation line. In discussing the situation with Mr. Lecy, we also discussed how much rear yard area would be necessary to keep the steep slope intact without having the property owner need it for a backyard play area. That is the reason a larger area than just 10 or 15 feet is being proposed to vacated. The rear corner of the house would match existing grades and use an area that is relatively free of major vegetation. The proposed change in the easement does leave the large oak trees in the scenic and conservation easement and the majority of the un(: erstory trees and brush untouched. RECOl\iMENDATION: The staff would recommend that the scenic and conservation easement for this lot be amended as proposed by Lecy Construction. In addition, staff would recommend that the builder post permanently the new scenic and conservation line, so that this does not become a problem in future years. The preference would be to use either metal stakes with the writing on a metal plaque or to use carsonite posts with a decal delineating the scenic and conservation easement line. In addition, the developer would have to pay all cost for having a public hearing to vacate this scenic and conservation easement area and the fees associated with redrawing the deeds and having them fIled at Hennepin County. SAF:mdd Lecy/Sluan 2 ~rECV-CONSTRUCTION DESIGNERS & BUILDERS ----------. L 10340 Viking Drive, Suite 105, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Office: (612) 944-9499 Fax: (612) 942·1068 October 19,1995 To: Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. Lecy Construction, Inc. proposes a two-story custom home on Lot 6 Block 1 Bluffs West 11th Addition. We are proposing an amendment of part of Scenic and Conservation Easement. See attached survey. The proposed home encroaches approximately 3-4 feet with an additional 10 feet for landscaping and yard purposes. The home is consistent in size with the other homes in the neighborhood. With a two-story design that maximizes square footage by stacking levels vrs. a spread out rambler design. A home of this size is required to meet neighborhood covenants and consistency. There will be no significant tree removal required to place this home. Three mature Oak trees in the rear yard not in the conservation area will remain vrs. a different design that would take more space in this area. Lot 6 is 42,646 square feet, approximately one acre. Approximately 31,500 square feet is in the existing Scenic and Conservation Drainage and Utility Easement, plus 11,146 square feet of the buildable area, plus standard 10 foot Drainage and Utility Easements. The proposed amended area would consist of approximately 2,700 square feet, or 6.4% of the lot surface. Special consideration has been taken by city planners and the developer for slope protection and run-off via grading and a catch basin system in rear. Lecy Construction, Inc. can assure the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission that slope protection, proper water run-off plan with erosion control, gutters, drainage to catch basin, and virtually no grading in the amended part of Scenic and Conservation Easement. Footings would extend the necessary distance into the ground so no additional backfill would be required in the southwest comer are 3. The patio comes out in the middle area of the basement and would require no retainage or fill work. This is, however, not in the conservation area. ~ Lecy Construction, Inc. EXHIBIT A CONSERVATION EASEMENT MODIFICATION That part of the following described property: Lot 6, Block 1, BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof. Which lies southwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a paint on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence on a bearing of West 28.67 feet; thence North 5 degrees 5 minutes 19 seconds West 54.71 feet; thence North 32 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds West 139.98 feet; thence North 54 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds West 34.49 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet westerly from the northeast comer of said Lot 6, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating. Bearings are oriented to the plat of BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION. EXHIBIT A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED That part of the following described property: Lot 6, Block 1, BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof. Which lies southwesterly of the following described line, hereinafter referred to as Line A: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence North 25 degrees 19 minutes 00 seconds West 156.10 feet; thence northwesterly 87.33 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet westerly from the northeast comer of said Lot 6, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating. And lies northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly comer of said Lot 6; thence on a bearing of West 28.67 feet; thence North 5 degrees 5 minutes 19 seconds West 54.71 feet; thence North 32 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds West 139.98 feet to the point of intersection of the above described Line A and the south line of the North 10.00 feet of said Lot 6, and there terminating. Except the Southeasterly 10 feet of said Lot 6. o Bearings are oriented to the plat of BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION. c o ~ .--0 -0 <: .c ..-,.- ,.- ..- (J) Q) $ en 5:: :J -CD -'7 --I_- I -- I I \ ---'- ,~ I I_- I , \ ... '..J I~ ... I r--I S3U~Y 31HIYHd N303 JO au\\ lS3M --- \ -c:> I,'" ,--;..C: Ie ,-) Ln ,.;~ -\ \~~ ',).) \~~ .... "", ... "" \ 00 ·001 L-----<:> Map 1 ( \ ) \"Y \. ": .. , "" .. \ ..) "6.} EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 12-5-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. \/,6 Jr-------------------~,_------------------~----- DEP ARTMENT: Community Development Chris Enger Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 11.3 acres Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this item at their November 13, 1995 meeting. The plat involves the dedication on road right-of-way for Aztec Drive and the platting of two outlots. The plat has been revised based on the conditions ofthe Staff Report. This is considered a housekeeping item. You will recall that a previous plat by the same name was withdrawn at the City Council on November 7, 1995. That plat could not be approved due to one of the property owners unwillingness to proceed. The revised plat does not involve this property owner. Supporting Reports: 1. Staff Report dated November 9, 1995 2. Planning Commission Unapproved Minutes of November 13, 1995 3. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 4. Correspondence v.B,-I ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION FOR 169 ANDERSON LAKES CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition for 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation dated November 29, 1995, consisting of 11.3 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of December, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk \/. B.· :z.. UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1995 7 p.m., City Center Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: Kenneth E. Clinton, Randy Foote, Ismail Ismail, Katherine Kardell, Douglas Sandstad, Edward Schlampp, Mary Jane Wissner STAFF MEMBERS: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Planner Kathleen O'Connor, R~corder I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE --ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Chair Katherine Kardell. Staff member, Michael Franzen was absent. I I . APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Wissner to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 7-0. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 23, 1995 MOTION: Sands tad moved, seconded by Foote to approve the Minutes of the October 23, 1995 meeting as submitted. Motion carried 7-0. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION by 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation. Request for Preliminary Plat of 11.3 acres into 2 out lots and road right-of-way. Location: Anderson Lakes parkway and Aztec Drive. Kipp reviewed the background of the proposal noting that the developer will be dedicating Aztec Drive right-of-way to the City. He also stated Abra Auto Body obtained a sanitary sewer easement along a portion of the south lot line of proposed outlot A, and that this easement should be reflected on the preliminary plat prior to City Council review. MOTION: hearing. Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to close the public Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to recommended to the City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat of 11.3 acres into two outlots and road right-of-way subject to plans dated September 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated November 9, 1995. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the plat to include the sanitary sewer easement that was obtained by the neighboring property owner to the south. Motion carried 7-0. V. MEMBERS' REPORTS None. VI. CONTINUING BUSINESS None. VII. NEW BUSINESS 1 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: " ---.... -' , " \ I \ . , \ \ , , , , , , ( c Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Planner November 9, 1995 Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation Anderson Lakes Parkway and Aztec Drive Preliminary Plat of 11.3 acres into 2 Outlots and road right-of-way. ... _ . ...:::: __ ._ .. _J . . ,. ;:.. : .. : .... 1 V. B. ~ ~ ( Staff Report Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition November 9, 1995 BACKGROUND c In Iune of this year, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of a plat of the same name for 12.4 acres into 3 Outlots and road right-of-way. The purpose of the plat was to dedicate the Aztec Drive right-of-way to the City, and to resolve a title/ownership issue between land owners by platting the property into separate outlots of record. Since that time, one of the property owners has decided not to participate in the platting of the property. Therefore, that platting request was withdrawn and a revised plat submitted for review and approval. The property is currently guided Neighborhood Commercial and zoned Rural, and is part of the Anderson Lakes Commercial Center PUD approved in 1984 for retail and restaurant uses. The PUD was amended in 1984 and 1986 and rezoned to Neighborhood Commercial for a day care . and gas station, respectively. The PUD is located at the southeast comer of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Highway 169. Surrounding uses consist of residential RI-13.5 zoning to the east, a future Abra Auto Body to the south, office guided property to the west, with commercial uses to the north. Aztec Drive, which traverses the property, was constructed in 1988. PRELIMINARY PLAT The platting does not include rezoning for the property, or approving any development plans. The request is to subdivide the 11.3 acres into 2 Outlots and road right-of-way. The portion of the property which is no longer a part of the subdivision is an exception to the plat, and can be platted at a future date. The developer will be dedicating Aztec Drive right-of-way to the City. The road is currently located in an outlot under private ownership. The PUD for this property anticipates future Neighborhood Commercial land uses, and the outlot sizes of 3.76 acres and 6.47 acres are consistent with previous PUD approvals, therefore variances for lot size less than 10 acres within the Rural zoning district are not required. Last month, the City Council approved the Abra Auto Body project, located to the south of this property. As part of that approval, Abra Auto Body obtained a sanitary sewer easement along a portion of the south lot line of proposed outlot A. Prior to Council review, this easement will need to be shown on the plat. V. 8,-S- ( Staff Report Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition November 9, 1995 RECOMMENDATIONS ( Staff would recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of 11.3 acres into 2 Outlots and road right-of-way subject to plans dated September 12, 1995, this report, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the plat to include the sanitary sewer easement that was obtained by the neighboring property owner to the south. 3 \/.6. -to C.nnesota Department of TranspoC"don Metropolitan Division September 25, 1995 Michael Franzen Community Development City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie MN 55344 Dear Michael Franzen: Waters Edge Building ISoo West County Road B2 Roseville, Minnesota SS 113 SUBJECT: Anderson Lakes Commercial Center Third Addition Preliminary Plat Review P/95-082 Southeast quadrant of TH 169 & Anderson Lakes Parkway Eden Prairie, Hennepin County CS 2744 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Anderson Lakes Commercial Center Third Addition preliminary plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subd. 2, Plats. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments. Many of these comments are a reiteration of our previous review of this plat, letter dated June 7, 1995. • Direct access from the site to Trunk Highway (TH) 169 will not be allowed. All access to TH 169, from the platted lots as well as the unplatted area north of Outlot B, must be by way of Aztec Drive or Anderson ·Lakes Parkway. • Tne site currently drains away from Ivln/DOT right of way.· if this condition should change, a Mn/DOT drainage permit will be required. Questions regarding Mn/DOT's drainage concerns may be directed to Brian Kelly of our Hydraulics Section at 797-3055. • The plat document appears to be consistent with our records of Mn/DOT right of way. However, the document should show and clearly label the centerline of TH 169, and dimension the distance from the centerline to the property boundary. Please forward a copy of the corrected document to Jeff Hoffstrom of our Surveys Section (797-3108); correspondence may be sent to 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley 55422. • Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way will require an approved Mn/DOT permit. The permit necessary depends on the nature of the proposed work. Bill Warden, of our permits section, may be contacted at 582-1443 for information regarding the permit process. An Equal Opportunity Employer V. 5, -7 ~ .' . ~ ",. .. Michael Franzen September 25, 1995 page two ( c If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at 582-1386. Sincerely, ~t4~ Ruth Ann Sobnosky Principal Transportation Planner cc: Pete Tulkki, Hennepin County Surveys Technician RAS:em ( ( ~~T~T~©L1~ ~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO WATERS, 1200 Warner Road, st. Paul, MN 55106 PHONE NO. 772-7910 FILENO. September 14, 1995 Mr. Scott Kipp, Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition, section 23, Township 116N, Range 22W, City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Kipp: We have reviewed the site plans (received September 12, 1995) for the above-referenced project (Section 23, Tll6N, R22W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. The site does not appear to be within a shoreland or floodplain district. 2. There are noDNR protected waters on the site. 3. It appears there are wetlands on the site that are not under DNR Public Waters Permit jurisdiction. You should be aware that your project may be subject to federal and local wetland regulations. The Department may provide additional comments on your project through our review of applications submitted under these other regulatory programs. 4. The following comments are general and apply to all proposed developments: a. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The Minnesota Construction site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook (Board of Water & Soil Resources and Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts) guidelines, or their equivalent, should be followed. b. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. You are advised that it typically takes AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER \/. ~. ~ 9 ( Mr. scott Kipp September 14, 1995 Page 2 approximately application. 60 days ( to process the permit c. The comments in this letter address DNR -Division of waters jurisdictional -matters and concerns. These comments should not be construed as DNR support ot lack thereof for a particular project. d. If construction activities disturb more than five acres of land, the contractor must apply for a stormwater permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Scott Thompson at 296-7203). Thank you for the opportuni ty to comment. Please contact Area Hydrologist Ceil strauss, Intern Jim Hafner or me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, ~~~-I~~ Jo'e Richter Hydrologist JR/JH/cds c: Hennepin Conservation District Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District \/.8. -/0 e~ DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~~t VECEMBER 5, 1995 SECTION: DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEl\1 NO. fINANCE PAYMENT Of" CLAIMS VI CHECKS NUMBER 36561 THRU 36944 ." . . Action/Direction: DECEMBER 5, 1995 36561 36562 36563 36564 36565 36566 36567 36568 36569 36570 36571 36572 36573 36574 36575 36576 36577 36578 36579 36580 36581 36582 36583 36584 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WITHHOLDING PAYMENT PAYROLL 11-10-95. WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT UNI PAYROLL 11-10-95. FAIRS NURSERY LANDSCAPE-RILEY LAKE PARK. GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE REGISTRATION 1995 COMPUTER SYMPOSIUM - CONFERENCE EXPENSE. CARVER COUNTY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SV PAYROLL 11-10-95. CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 11-10-95. CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 11-10-95. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK SAVINGS BOND 11-10-95. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 11-10-95. HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 11-10-95. HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 11-10-95. ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 11-10-95. INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS UNION DUES FOR NOVEMBER-PAYROLL 10-27-95. MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 11-10-95. MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 11-10-95. MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PAYROLL 11-10-95. MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 11-10-95. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PERA PERA LIFE INSURANCE PAYROLL 11-10-95. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PERA PAYROLL 11-10-95. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PERA PAYROLL 11-10/-95. UNITED WAY PAYROLL 11-10-95. ALLIED FIRESIDE REFUND-MECHANICAL PERMIT. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE. L M CIT 2ED QUARTERLY INSTALLMENT-WORKERS IV 36585 36586 36587 36588 36589 36590 36591 36592 BRUNSWICK EDEN PRAIRIE LANES CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER BARBARA COOK COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY PLAN. SPECIAL TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. VOIV OUT CHECK EGAN MECHANICAL ELANDER MECHANICAL DUANE HARRISON ROBERT A HAUGEN 36593 KARL HESS 36594 JULIE HOEFT 36595 36596 36597 36598 36599 36600 36601 HOKANSON PLUMBING KAMI KISSNER BOB LAMBERT BOB LAMBERT LECC DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SHERI L MOON EN 36602 MRPA 36603 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 36604 VOIV OUT CHECK 20319591 DECEMBER 5, 1995 SPECIAL TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. MEETING EXPENSE. REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT. REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT. REFUND-EMf TRAINING. REIMBURSE FOR TOOLS PURCHASED FOR FIRE DEPT. SERVICE-GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EPAA APPRECIATION DINNER. REFUND-PLUMBING PERMIT. SERVICE-GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. REIMBURSE-ROTARY DUES AND OFFICE SUPPLIES. REIMBURSE-MEETING EXPENSE. TRAINING EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT. FIREARM SAFETY FEES COLLECTED. REIMBURSEMENT FOR YOUTH RECREATION ACTIVITIES. MEETING EXPENSE-SENIOR CENTER. SERVICE. 1. 81837.56 700.00 4960.00 420.00 276.93 49.37 90.00 400.00 8435.50 240.46 275.08 4144.26 1306.00 227.42 247.00 1251.50 25.00 237.00 41542.15 17.50 139.75 13.50 10.65 54203.50 321 .. 58 173 .. 72 16 .. 50 0 .. 00 15 .. 50 150 .. 65 40.00 248.97 225.00 6.39 150.65 75.00 153.88 25.00 '10.00 125.00 270.98 25.00 111. 96 0.00 DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36605 JEAN HARRIS ADVANCE-NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 200.00 CONFERENCE. 36606 CARL JULLIE REIBURSEMENT FOR ROTARY CLUB DUES/MEALS/ 164.00 PARKING-CITY HALL. 36607 CARL J JULLIE ADVANCE-NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 200.00 CONFERENCE. 36608 PATRICIA PIDCOCK ADVANCE-NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 200.00 CONFERENCE. 36609 QUALITY HOTEL CONFERENCE EXPENSE-CITY COUNCIL. 409.35 36610 ROSS THORFINNSON JR ADVANCE-NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 200.00 CONFERENCE. 36611 WINDHAM METRO CENTER ROOM RESERVATIONS FOR JEAN HARRIS -590 .. 70 ARRIVAL 11/27/95 DEPARTURE 12/3/95. 36612 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING DISTRICT #1. 1124 .. 20 36613 THE RAMADA HOTEL CONFERENCE EXPENSE-CITY COUNCIL. 457.92 36614 BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 741.12 36615 BEST SEAMLESS GUTTERS REHAB WORK -MARTIN ANDERSON. 458.00 36616 THOMAS BROOKS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 30.00 36617 THOMAS BROOKS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. 40.00 36618 CENTRAIRE INC REPAIRS-LIQUOR STORE III. 243.19 36619 JEFF ELWELL REIMBURSE FOR BOILER LICENSE RENEWAL-15.00 COMMUNITY CENTER. 36620 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC MESSANGER SERVICE-CITY HALL. 79.19 36621 KARIN HARRIS REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. 10.28 36622 ITS A KEEPER EMPLOYEE AWARDS-HUMAN RESOURCES. 417.21 36623 JOAN MATHIEU REIMBURSEMENT OF OUTDOOR CENTER FEE -$10. 55.00 00 PROCESSING FEE. 36624 SCOTT MEULEBROECK SERVICE-CHAPERONE YOUTH RECREATION-FEES 70.00 PAID. 36625 MODEL STONE CO RENTAL BLANKETS/DIAMOND BLADE-STREET 306.21 MAINTENANCE. 36626 PARAGON CABLE MPLS CABLE SERVICE-FIRE STATION #3. 12.29 36627 TIM PELTIER REIMBURSE FOR TOOLS PURCHASED FOR FIRE 67.82 DEPT. 36628 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT. 90.67 36629 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSE-CITY HALL. 580.15 36630 GARRETT SMELTZER REIMBURSE MILEAGE EXPENSE-COMMUNITY 20.72 CENTER. 36631 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES. 114.80 36632 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC OCTOBER LEGAL ADVERTISING-CITY HALL. 470.85 36633 TOM SCHMITZ KNOT BOARDS-FIRE STATIONS. 150.00 36634 CHAD SEWICH SERVICE-YOUTH CHAPERONE-FEES PAID. 98.00 36635 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 36636 KATHY TEKEL LA SERVICE-INSTRUCTOR OUTDOOR CENTER-FEES 240.00 PAID. 36637 STAN TEKIELA SERVICE-INSTRUCTOR OUTDOOR CENTER-FEES 160.00 PAID. 36638 STAN TEKEILA SUPPLIES OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS/ 59.33 MEMBERSHIP CORNELL FEEDERWATCH. 36639 U S WEST CELLULAR INC SERVICE. 666.67 874267 DECEMBER 5, 1995 2. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36640 VALLEY VIEW H 0 ASSOCIATES REFUND-RENTAL FEE REVISED SPACE BLDG 30.00 PERMIT #2297. 36641 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO DISABILITY INSURANCE FOR NOVEMBER. 2164.82 36642 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO LIFE INSURANCE FOR NOVEMBER PAYROLL 11-10-2962.48 95. 36643 JAKE CHRISTIANSEN SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 42.50 36644 PETER J HARMES SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 42.50 36645 JOHN HENDERSON SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 110.50 36646 LARRY HILLARD SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL/ATTENDANT/ 165.00 OPEN GYM-FEES PAID. 36647 JOHN CARTER HOLMES SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-406.50 FEES PAID. 36648 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE. 30371.57 36649 SQUARE CUT PHOTO IMAGING BOOKING STATION-POLICE DEPT. 836" 14 36650 AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNESOTA PAGING SERVICE-ASSESSING/UTILITIES/HUMAN 2062 .. 98 RESOURCES/PUBLIC WORKS/FIRE DEPT/PARKS REC FACILITIES/HUMAN RESOURCES/POLICE DEPT. 36651 L M CIT RISK INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR DEC 95 JAN 96 1663 .. 25 FEB 96. 36652 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SENIOR CENTER HORMEL TRIP-FEES PAID. 403.00 36653 MINNESOTA ASSOC COMMUNITY THEATRE DUES-MINNESOTA ASSOC COMMUNITY THEATRE 30.00 FOR PERFORMING ARTS. 36654 NRPA NATIONAL AQUATICS OFFICE TRAINING MATERIALS-AQUATICS COMMUNITY 18.95 CENTER. 36655 PRISM HOLIDAYS GROUP TRIP TO SICILY-FEES PAID. 2450.00 36656 JERRY PRODOEHL REIMBURSE FOR MN ST SUPERINTENDENT ASSOC 17.00 NOV 14 BUSINESS MEETING. 36657 DAN OTTEN MILEAGE-INSPECTION DEPT. 10.36 36658 MARC THIELMAN REIMBURSEMENT-OFFICE SUPPLIES. 53.25 36659 TWIN CITY AREA LABOR MGMT COUNCIL TRAINING FOR NEW MEMBERS. 120.00 36660 KEVIN WHITE REIMBURSE TRAINING MATERIALS/PARKING 47.30 POLICE DEPT. 36661 BELLBOY CORPORATION BEER. 153.00 36662 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 9223.90 36663 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER. 17283.10 36664 LINCOLN DISTRIBUTING CO BEER. 224.00 36665 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 16522.44 36666 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO BEER/MIX. 1420.25 36667 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY MIX. 349.60 36668 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 21857.10 36669 VOW OUT CHECK 0.00 36670 DOUGLAS ANDREWS SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 876.00 36671 JOHN BENIK SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 712.00 36672 GERALD BOHN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1724.00 36673 JAY BOHLEN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 870.00 36674 LANCE BRACE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1436.00 36675 RAYMOND F CARLSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1422~. 00 36676 SPENCER L CONRAD SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 3188.00 36677 GENE DAHLKE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1380.00 12264949 DECEMBER 5, 1995 3. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36678 TROY DANIELSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 696.00 36679 RICHARV VEATON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2138.00 36680 JOSEPH R DOHENY SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 762.00 36681 LARRV DOIG SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2080.00 36682 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 36683 PATRICIA ENFIELD SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 888.00 36684 GEORGE ESBENSEN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1636.00 36685 CHARLES FERN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 804.00 36686 CHUCK GOBLE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1320.00 36687 GARY GOULV SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 136.00 36688 ROBERT L GREENINGER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1130.00 36689 ROBERT GRANT SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1446.00 36690 GREG GUNDERSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 828.00 36691 RICK HAMMERSCHMIDT SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1692.00 36692 VOIV OUT CHECK SERVICE-FIRE & RES CUR CALLS. 0.00 36693 STEVEN HANLON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 548.00 36694 SCOTT HANLON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1458.00 36695 ROBERT HAUGEN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1440.00 36696 DUANE HARRISON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1152.00 36697 JOHN HOBBS SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1878.00 36698 JAIMS GLENN JOHNSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1182.00 36699 SCOTT JOHNSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1242.00 36700 RANDY KIVI SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 124.00 36701 KENNETH W KOCH SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1536.00 36702 STEVE KOERING SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 960.00 36703 CHRISTOPHER KORWES SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 92.00 36704 MICHAEL LADEN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1962.00 36705 TONY LIDDELL SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 228.00 36706 REGAN MASSEE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 576.00 36707 MARK MASTAIN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 140.00 36708 GARY MEYER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2074.00 36709 BRIAN MCGRAW SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1050.00 36710 THOMAS MONTGOMERY SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2566.00 36711 JAMES MROZLA SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1734.00 36712 SCOTT OBERLANDER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1156.00 36713 JAY 0 CONNELL SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 348.00 36714 KATHLEEN 0 CONNER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1260.00 36715 KEITH OLSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1074.00 36716 GEORGE OSWALV SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 128.00 36717 DONALD OVERBEY SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2016.00 36718 GARY RADTKE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1020.00 36719 JAMES PELTIER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2286.00 36720 TIMOTHY PELTIER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2454.00 36721 MICHAEL PERSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 224.00 36722 DEREK PETERSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1774.00 36723 MICHAEL POWERS SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 120.00 36724 SCOTT REINHARDT SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 40.00 36725 JEFFREY RICHARDS SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 336.00 36726 JOHN REIGERT SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1628.00 36727 JOHN ROCHFORD SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 996.00 5435800 DECEMBER 5, 1995 4. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36728 MICHAEL ROGERS SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2164.00 36729 TIM SATHER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2460.00 36730 CHARLES SCHAITBERGER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 3418.00 36731 KURT W SCHENDEL SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 876.00 36732 ROGER SCHMIDTKE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 894.00 36733 THOMAS SCHMITZ SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1492.00 36734 LEE SCHNEIDER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1422.00 36735 SCOTT SCHRAM SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1408.00 36736 CHARLES E SIEBERT SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1312.00 36737 TODD SKATRUD SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1504.00 36738 JOHN SKRANKA SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1002.00 36739 KIP SPRINGER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 768.00 36740 MARK SNETTING SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 912.00 36741 SCOTT G SUNQUIST SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1126.00 36742 SCOTT TAYLOR SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1356.00 36743 MARC THIELMAN SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1048.00 36744 DOUG THIES SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1714.00 36745 TODD TOMCZIK SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1456.00 36746 RODNEY UTING SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1248.00 36747 MARK VANDERBERGHE SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 2584.00 36748 FRANK WEBER SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1218.00 36749 THOMAS WILSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 1462.00 36750 VOW OUT CHECK 0.00 36751 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SERVICE-MATURE DRIVING CLASS-FEES PAID. 240.00 36752 APPLEBEES NEIGHBORHOOD GRILL AND GIFT CERTIFICATES FOR Q-TIP AWARDS. 100.00 36753 AUTO-SOUND-ENTRONIX REPAIR DASH-SPEEDOMETER. 100.70 36754 SGT LOREN A EVENRUD SERVICE-TRAINING CLASS-FIRE DEPT. 300.00 36755 KERRY FIERKE SERVICE-SPECIAL EVENTS-FEES PAID. 71.75 36756 ALAN HANSON SERVICE-FIRE & RESCUE CALLS. 954.00 36757 JASON-NORTHCO L P #1 DECEMBER RENT-LIQUOR STORE I. 5197.00 36758 KAMI KISSNER SERVICE-SPECIAL EVENTS-FEES PAID. 66.50 36759 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH. 69.00 36760 MERVYNS CALIFORNIA GIFT CERTIFICATE / Q-TIP AWARD. 50.00 36761 TRACY SPANGRUD SERVICE-DANCE INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. 235.90 36762 TELLUS CONSULTANTS INC HISTORIC PRESERVATION HANDBOOK PRODUCTION. 929.48 36763 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. 5804.11 36764 APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AT 14350 PIONEER 667.50 TRAIL ABANDONED HOUSE. 36765 AFFIRMED MEDICAL SERVICES INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 125 .. 85 36766 AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNESOTA NOVEMBER PAGING SERVICE FOR POLICE DEPT/ 70.29 FIRE DEPT. 36767 THE APPRAISAL JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS-ASSESSING DEPT. 95 .. 00 36768 ASLA MEMBERSHIP 1996 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE 126 .. 50 ARCHITECTS MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL. 36769 ASSOCIATED WELL DRILLERS INC PUMP REMOVAL AT BOYCE HOUSE-PIONEER TRAIL. 148 .. 25 36770 ASTLEFORD INTL INC BELT-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 53 .. 25 36771 AUDIO VISUAL WHOLESALERS PROJECTOR MOUNT/CABLE/CONNECTORS-FIRE 1674.95 DEPT. 36772 A U S COMMUNICATIONS INC WIRING FOR BOOKING SYSTEM-POLICE DEPT. 370.33 36773 AVR INC CONCRETE-STREET DEPT. 239.44 5053380 DECEMBER 5, 1995 5. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36774 BAUER BUILT INC BATTERIES-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 319.39 36775 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC SPREADER TOWEL FOR ICE ARENA-COMMUNITY 39.60 CENTER. 36776 BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 405.95 36777 BFI TIRE RECYCLERS OF MN INC TRAILER AND CAGE RENTAL-FLEET SERVICES. 345 .. 00 36778 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON OCTOBER KENNAL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT. 333.00 36779 B&K ELECTRIC MARTIN ANDERSON-REHAB PROGRAM. 909,,00 36780 BREDAHL PLUMBING REIMBURSEMENT FOR OVERPAYMENT ON PLUMBING 10 .. 00 PERMIT. 36781 B & STOOLS STEERING PULLEY PULLER INSTALLER/LONG 485.64 PUNCHES/RADIATOR ADAPTER-FLEET MAINTENANCE/FIRE DEPT. 36782 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO DOOR CLOSER-FACILITIES. 105.44 36783 BRAUER AND ASSOCIATES LTD SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK ENTRY ARES 1000.00 PLANNING. 36784 BROADWAY AWARDS APPR PLAQUE SPECIAL EVENTS/YOUTH 358.22 RECREATION DEPT. 36785 B CLEAN SERVICES FURNITURE CLEANING-FIRE STATION I AND II. 581.48 36786 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION SERVICE-PHEASANT WOODS PARK GEOTECHNICAL 3125.00 EVALUATION. 36787 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS UNTERMINATED CABLE-FIRE DEPT. 73.49 36788 CARGILL SALT DIVISION DEICING SALT-STREET MAINTENANCE. 4577.40 36789 FRANCIS CARR SERVICE-DIVERSITY TRAINING CONSULTANT. 200.00 36790 CARLSON COUSELING & CONSULTATION COUNSELING SERVICES-EMPLOYEE BENIFITS. 2590.00 36791 CENTRAIRE INC REPAIR FURNACE-FAMILY CENTER. 60.00 36792 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS SAWBAR/BAR COVER-PARK MAINT TREE REMOVAL. 312.35 36793 CHUCKS BAGS EM! BAG-FIRE DEPT. 53.25 36794 COMMERCIAL WINDOW COVERINGS MINI BLIND-POLICE DEPT. 115.55 36795 JOHN CONLEY CLOTHING FOR DEER REDUCTION PROGRAM. 253.60 36796 CONVEYORS INCORPORATED PLOW BELTING-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 375.15 36797 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER SHOCKS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 69.71 36798 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS PAGER REPAIR/RADIO REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 2557.69 CONTRACT-POLICE DEPT. 36799 C&H DISTRIBUTORS INCORPORATED STRETCH WRAP-FACILITIES. 94.81 36800 CIGAR AFICIONADO GIFT SUBSCRIPTIO 1996 SUBCRIPTION-LIQUOR STORE III. 16.95 36801 C02 SERVICES NOVEMBER C02 TANK RENTAL-COMMUNITY CENTER. 35.00 36802 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY SUPPLIES-SAFETY DEPT. 66.15 36803 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE COMMUNITY SERVICE EXPENSE. 2000.00 36804 CORPORATE AUTO RENTALS INC VAN RENTAL-ADAPTIVE REC. 52.19 36805 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC HAIR PIN CLEVIS/SEAL BUTT/CONNECTORS-175.91 FLEET MAINTENANCE. 36806 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO RATCHET KIT/FACESHIELD/MOUNTING HARDWARE-90.00 FIRE DEPT. 36807 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO STRAP/BUCKLE ASSEM/HARNESS/COIL/SPRING/ 384.04 GAUGE/VALVE/DIAPHRAGM ASSEM/SENSOR-FIRE DEPT. 36808 GARY DIETHELM INTERNMENT FEE-SCHMIT. 180.00 36809 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-YOUTH RECREATION. 29.07 36810 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 81.83 36811 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER. 85.33 2254719 DECEMBER 5, 1995 6. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36812 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY SEPT 95 USAGE BILLING-CITY HALL. 362.30 36813 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NOVEMBER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LUNCHEON. 77 .00 36814 EDEN PRAIRIE FLORIST ARRANGEMENT-FRED ZIEBOL. 42.28 36815 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD PARTS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 338.t2 36816 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 USE OF GYMS FOR TAE KWON DO CLASSES/ 372.00 SQUARE DANCING/FLOOR HOCKEY-ADAPTIVE REC/ SENIOR CENTER/YOUTH REC. 36817 CHRIS ENGER PARKING EXPENSE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 12.50 36818 FAUVER SANDER AND AUGER MOTOR-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 274.40 36819 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION POSTAGE EXPENSE-CITY HALL. 25.00 36820 FERRELLGAS PROPANE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 79.85 36821 FITNESS WHOLESALE FITNESS PROGRAM DYNA BANDS FOR FITNESS 64.00 CLASSES. 36822 FLOYD SECURITY SECURITY-GRILL HOUSE. 80.94 36823 FRANKLIN QUEST CO SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 176.79 36824 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE-YOUTH RECREATION. 118.16 36825 FUNK-HANECY DISTRIBUTORS INC REPAIRS IN CARPETING-CITY CENTER. 321.00 36826 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC REPAIR TO REFRIGERATION SYSTEM-COMMUNITY 664.40 CENTER. 36827 GE CAPITAL COPIER-COMMUNITY CENTER. 134.75 36828 GE CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE CUSTOM MOBILE OFFICE-PRAIRIE VIEW PARK. 22848.83 36829 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO BINDERS/INDEX CARDS/FORMS/PENCIL 225.98 SHARPENER/TOWLETTES/MISC SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT/BINDERS/INDEX CARDS/FORMS/PENCIL SHARPENER/TOWLETTES/MISC SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 36830 GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS GREEN PLANT-EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION. 26.25 36831 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE. 39.32 36832 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SVC TIRES-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 690.35 36833 GREEN ESPEL TRAINING-POLICE DEPT. 1400.00 36834 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 2760.48 36835 JIM HATCH SALES CO POLY WAFERS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 347.96 36836 HAWK DIRECT SALES INC LABEL SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE. 209.25 36837 HARMON GLASS COMPANY GLASS REPLACEMENT-PARK MAINTENANCE/FLEET 0.00 SERVICE. 36838 HARRIS COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 10.18 36839 HEAVENLY HAM MEETING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 27.50 36840 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE 1996 MEMBERSHIP DUES-POLICE DEPT. 200.00 36841 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER COUNTY PROJECT 7419 ON CSAH 62. 106197.00 36842 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY OWNERS LISTS-COMMUNITY 771.25 DEVELOPMENT. 36843 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ROOM AND BOARD-POLICE DEPT. 962.00 36844 D C HEY COMPANY INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIREDEPT/ 90 .. 96 INSPECTIONS. 36845 HILAN CORPORATION CARRIAGE BOLTS/SLEEVE NUTS-PARK 22 .. 49 MAINTENANCE. 36846 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 95 COMMUNITY NEWS 3497.,49 LETTER PRINTING. 36847 IACP NET CUSTOMER SERVICE SOFTWARE IACP NET FOR WINDOWS-POLICE DEPT. 25.00 36848 IACP NET LOGIN SERVICES 1996 IACP NET RENEWAL FEE-POLICE DEPT. 800.00 14429578 DECEMBER 5, 1995 7. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36849 IFCI PUBLICATIONS-INSPECTION DEPT. 95.00 36850 THE INNOVATION GROUPS PUBLICATIONS-CITY HALL. 59.90 36851 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS MEMBERSHIP INTERNATIONAL FACILITY MGMT 150.00 ASSOC-FACILITIES. 36852 TOM HOLMES SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 262 . .50 36853 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMY FOR PUBLIC MGMT WORKSHOP SESSIONS-4777.50 TRAINING CITY HALL. 36854 BRENDA JERDE SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 72.00 36855 CRAIG JERDE SERVICE-HOST-FEES PAID. 175.00 36856 IT A KEEPER SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCES. 238.83 36857 PAM KLOOS SUPPLIES-KIDS CORNER/YOUTH RECREATION. 28.18 36858 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD OCT 95 LEGAL SERVICE-PROSECUTION POLICE 19353.92 DEPT $10323.27. 36859 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR DOOR REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT I/AMBULANCE GARAGE 133.90 TECHNOLOGY DR. 36860 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO LIGHTING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES. 889.50 36861 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC FILTERS-FLEET SERVICES. 247.25 36862 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 1642.06 36863 LANDS END CORPORATE SALES UNIFORM EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT. 95.00 36864 LANO EQUIPMENT INC SNOW PLOW FRAME-PARK MAINTENANCE. 292.88 36865 LEAANNS SEWING CUSTOM DECORATING CANVAS FACE MASK BAGS-FIRE DEPT. 290.00 36866 L M CIT 3RD INSTALLMENT SELF INSURED WORKERS 54203.50 COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 36867 MARTIN-MCALLISTER CONSULTING SERVICES-CITY HALL. 750.00 36868 ANN MABBOTT DIVERSITY TRAINING CONSULTANT. 300.00 36869 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT. 188.51 36870 R S MEARS CO INC PUBLICATIONS-FACILITIES. 274.58 36871 MENARDS DEER HUNTING SIGNS/HAMMER/BATTERIES/BEVEL/ 263.41 SQUARE/BITS/LATCH/KEYS/LOCKS/LIGHTS/ CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS/CONCRETE/CEDAR- PARK MAINTENANCE-FLEET SERVICES-UTILITIES. 36872 METRO FIRE INC SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 415.35 36873 MID-AMERICA POWER DRIVES COUPLERS/PISTON PUMP W SPLINE SHAFT-FLEET 1273.34 MAINTENANCE. 36874 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGING SERVICE-INSPECTIONS DEPT. 73.44 36875 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/CITY HALL. 299.86 36876 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP ASPHALT-STREET MAINTENANCE. 149.23 36877 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 1091.79 36878 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION 1996 MEMBERSHIP DUES-POLICE DEPT. 145 .. 00 36879 MINNESOTA CONWAY RECHARGE FIRE EXT-FIRE DEPT. 87 .. 99 36880 MN EMPLOYEE RECREATION AND SERVIC 1996 ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIP DUES. 200 .. 00 36881 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES. 300 .. 00 36882 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT WOOD LOK NUTS-PARK MAINTENANCE. 16. 11 36883 MUNICILITE CO LIGHTS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 428.96 36884 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES. 109.74 36885 NELSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SIREN REPAIR-CIVIL DEFENSE. 354.20 36886 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERIES-FIRE DEPT. 419.70 36887 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC LINKS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 41.75 36888 JOHN A OTT FACILILATION TRAINING. 300.00 36889 PAPER DIRECT INC SUPPLIES-REC DEPT. 138.60 9062848 DECEMBER 5, 1995 8. DECEMBER 5, 1995 IV 36890 PHOTOS INC PRINTING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 151.76 36891 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 690.85 36892 PITNEY BOWES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-POLICE DEPT. 200.00 36893 POWER PRODUCTIONS AEROBICS MUSIC/TAPES FOR CLASSES-69.35 COMMUNITY CENTER. 36894 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC SHIRTS-ADULT RECREATION DEPT. 342.84 36895 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REMOVE SURGE PROTECTION FROM OLD PUBLIC 1847.97 SAFETY AND REINSTALL IN CITY CENTER/ INSTALL DUPLEX RECEPTACLE IN CEILING AT FIRE STATION I/FURNISH AND INSTALL FIXTURE IN POOL AREA. 36896 THE PROMOTION GROUP UNIFORM EXPENSE-SAFETY DEPT. 115.25 36897 RADIO SHACK CALC BATTERY-POLICE DEPT. 12 .. 72 36898 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 36899 LEE RAY SERVICE-SOFTBALL/BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES 367 .. 50 PAID. 36900 REAL JUSTICE PUBLICATIONS-POLICE DEPT. 33 .. 00 36901 SCOTT REIN SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 1680.00 36902 RICOH CORPORATION EQUIPMENT USAGE-CITY HALL. 626 .. 86 36903 RICHFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER SPECIAL EVENT-SENIOR CENTER-FEES PAID. 523 .. 75 36904 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED SNOW PLOW CUTTING EDGE-FLEET SERVICES. 254,,38 36905 RINK SYSTEMS INC REPAIR FREON LEAK-RINK I-COMMUNITY CENTER. 1285,,31 36906 RITZ CAMERA FILM AND PHOTO DEVELOPMENT. 80.,33 36907 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 182.,81 36908 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC HALLOWEEN PARTY SUPPLIES-YOUTH RECREATION. 68.53 36909 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES/SNO MELT-FACILITIES. 693 .. 52 36910 WILBUR W SCHULTZ SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL/SOFTBALL OFFICIAL-FEES 3766.50 PAID/4310. 36911 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC PUBLICATIONS-LIQUOR STORE. 30.01 36912 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSE-CITY COUNCIL/ 715.16 COMMUNICATIONS/CITY HALL/FIRE DEPT/SENIOR ISSUES. 36913 PETER SMITH SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 126.00 36914 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIRS TO POOL AIR HANDLER-COMMUNITY 147.25 CENTER. 36915 SOURCECOM TRAINING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES. 198.49 36916 SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNING 3RD QRT PAYMENT TO SUPPORT FAMILY 4336.25 SERVICES COLLABORATIVE. 36917 SOUTHWEST LAWN MAINTENANCE INC STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE WESTON BAY ROAD. 1516.50 36918 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT AD-HUMAN RESOURCES. 29.40 36919 THE SPECTACLE SHOPPE INC SAFETY EYEWEAR-FIRE DEPT. 188.00 36920 STAR TRIBUNE SUNDAY PAPERS FOR RESALE-LIQUOR STORE III. 21.90 36921 STERLING GROUP REAL ESTATE SERVICES FOR POTENTIAL SALE 3200.00 OF 7900 MITCHELL RD. 36922 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT/DOME-FLEET SERVICES. 1015.40 36923 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET TENSIONER/BELT-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 81.48 36924 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE PUMPED HOLDING TANK-OUTDOOR CENTER. 95.00 36925 TCALMC CONFERENCE EXPENSE. 285.00 36926 THERMOGAS CO OF CHASKA SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER. 380.00 36927 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC SUPPLIES-FACILITIES. 123.42 2548249 DECEMBER 5, 1995 9. DECEMBER 5, 1995 36928 TONKA CYCLE AND SKI 36929 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN-MTKA 36930 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 36931 US POSTAL SERVICE 36932 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC 36933 URBAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INC 36934 WATER SPECIALTY OF MN-INC 36935 WBCS 36936 WEATHER WATCH INC 36937 SANDRA F WERTS 36938 JOEL WESTACOTT 36939 WEST WELD 36940 WILCOX AND WILLIAMS 36941 THE WORK CONNECTION 36942 WORK AND FAMILY CONNECTION 36943 SANDY WORM 36944 ZIEGLER INC 22000 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 22000 MN VEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 55000 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 44000 MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 11000 NORWEST BANK 35435 VOID OUT CHECK 35452 VOID OUT CHECK 36292 VOID OUT CHECK 36399 VOID OUT CHECK 36404 VOID OUT CHECK 36526 VOID OUT CHECK 36531 VOID OUT CHECK 36556 VOID OUT CHECK 36692 VOID OUT CHECK 8951573 DECEMBER 5, 1995 REPAIR PARTS-COMMUNITY CENTER. FERTILIZATION-SENIOR CENTER/FIRE STATION 5. UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT/INSPECTIONS/FIRE DEPT. BULK MAIL RENEWAL FEE FOR 1996. STOCK-FLEET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE. NOV/DEC 95 DEER REDUCTION PROGRAM. IV CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE/CHLORINE NEUTRALIZER/ LIQUID CLORINE/TEST TABLETS-COMMUNITY CENTER. HERITAGE SITE PLAQUE. WEATHER SERVICE FOR DEC-STREET MAINTENANCE. MILEAGE/CONFERENCE EXPENSE-SENIOR CENTER. VIDEO SERVICES-PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL MEETING/LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS. WIRE/WHEELS/STRIKER/GLOVES/LENSES/ ELECTRODE-FLEET MAINTENANCE. BINDINGS-OUTDOOR CENTER. SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE. SUBCRIPTION-CITY HALL. COVER HAY-STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE. SERVICE CONTRACT FOR GENERATOR-POLICE DEPT. PAYROLL 10-27-95. PAYROLL 11-10-95. OCT SPECIAL FUEL TAX. OCTOBER 95 SALES TAX. BOND PAYMENTS. 10. 45.62 171.25 716.44 170.00 254.67 3640.00 789.74 17.50 150.00 77 .40 315.00 331 .. 31 185,,65 1362,.84 245 .. 00 410 .. 00 595.,00 17703.88 17302.55 300.40 36346.00 9625.00 42.00- 26.00- 26.00- 66.82- 100.55- 585.65- 198.62- 193.88- 548.00- $811949.54 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: December 5, 1995 SECTION: Reports of Advisory Boards and Commissions Housing, Transportation, Social Services Board (HTSSB) DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO: Community Development Update on HOPE Program Chris Enger I£ -I David Lindahl REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: No action requested. BACKGROUND: A single mother participating in the ~en Prairie HOPE Program and her volunteer-mentor family will share some of their experiences with the City Council. Mary Keating also will be present to give a brief update on the number of participants matched with volunteer families as well as progress made by participating families toward achieving self-sufficiency. Mary Keating is coordinating the volunteer matching component of the Program and provides case management oversight to all the participating families. Members of the Housing, Transportation, and Social Services Board (HTSSB) will be present to answer questions. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: Please review attachment for a summary of the HOPE Program. IX. -lev Eden Prairie Housing • Opportunities • Partnerships • Employment (HOPE) Program What is HOPE? • HOPE is a housing and family support program aimed at promoting economic self-sufficiency through education, job training, and family support. • Requires participation in a five-year effort (contract) to achieve self-sufficiency. Families must enroll, or be enrolled, in one of the following self-sufficiency programs: Success Through Reaching Individual Development & Employment (STRIDE) Job Training Partnership Act Program (JTPA) Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP) • Families already enrolled in one of the self-sufficiency programs can subtract the time spent in a program from the five-year FSS contract. • Families successfully completing six months in one of the three self-sufficiency programs will be issued a Section 8 housing voucher. Families can keep the Section 8 Voucher provided they follow- through with their FSS Contract obligations and they remain income eligible. • Participating families must meet with a volunteer support (mentor) family from Eden Prairie once a month. Who is HOPE For? • Families (2-5 person households) residing at Prairie Meadows or Briarhill Apartment developments that are eligible for either STRIDE, JTPA, or MFIP, or that are currently enrolled in one of these programs. Fifteen families will be assisted through the HOPE Program. • • • Why HOPE? More low-income rental housing is needed in Eden Prairie, evident by long waiting lists at existing Section 8 housing developments (3-7 years). HOPE provides housing on a scattered basis while opening-up more Section 8 project-based housing for families on waiting lists. Vouchers allow families to integrate into market-rate housing of their choice. Most importantly, HOPE links housing with a family self-sufficiency effort, with the overall goal of providing families opportunities to move off housing assistance entirely. Where is HOPE Housing Located? HOPE families can live in any market-rate rental property in Eden Prairie that has vacancies, and that accept Section 8 Vouchers. HOPE participants, like any others seeking rental housing, must have good rental histories and references to qualify to live in market-rental housing. When Does HOPE begin? HOPE officially began May 10, 1995 with a lottery to determine participation of fifteen families. a -I b HOPE Partnerships HOPE is a cooperative effort between the City of Eden Prairie, the Metropolitan Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority (Metro HRA), Hennepin Technical College of Richfield, and Family to Family Ties. Each partner plays a specific role in delivering the HOPE Program which are as follows: City of Eden Prairie (David Lindahl, HRA Manager -Housing, Transportation, and Social Services Board • Overall Program Coordination. • On-going Program Evaluation. • Program Marketing and Outreach. • Develop Eden Prairie Employment-Opportunity Database. • Meet with Other Partners as Needed to Communicate Progress or Issues Metro HRA (Kathy Kline, Metro HRA Operations Supervisor) • Issue Section 8 Vouchers. • Administer Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Contracts -monitor progress. • Maintain Client Escrow Accounts. • Meet with Other Partners as Needed to Communicate Progress or Issues. • • • • • • • • • • • Hennepin County Technical College -Richfield (Ann Henrich, Welfare to Work Coordinator) Administer STRIDE & JTPA Programs. Provide Case Management Services. Help Clients Develop Individual Training & Service Plan (part of FSS contract). Work with City in Coordinating Employment Database. Monitor FSS progress. Meet with Other Partners as Needed to Communicate Progress or Issues. Family to Family Ties (Mary Keating, Family Support Coordination) Seek, Evaluate, and Train Volunteers to Provide Family Support Services. Provide Case Management to partipating families. Coordinate Overall Family Support Effort. Match Volunteer Families with HOPE Families. Moderate Issues that May Occur Between Families. Meet with Other Partners as Needed to Communicate Progress or Issues. 1Z -/C; HOPE Self-Sufficiency Programs (HTC Richfield) • STRIDE (Success Through Reaching Individual Development and Employment), is a program to assist eligible families receiving AFDC to become self-sufficient through obtaining employment and, if necessary, training. Eligibility requirements are for persons receiving AFDC who fit into one of these • • categories: Person who received AFDC for any 36 or the past 60 months (3 of the past 5 years). Person age 18 through 23 years on AFDC who has not completed high school or a G.E.D. Person who is 23 years or under, on AFDC with little or no work experience. Person whose youngest child is within 2 years of being ineligible for AFDC (age 16 or older). STRIDE services include: Job search assistance Transportation assistance Childcare Career planning Skills refresher Sources for tuition funding JTPA (Jobs Training Partnership Act) is career counseling, training, and placement program for unemployed or underemployed families. Eligibility is determined by family size and income. JTPA provides the following services: Career counseling/testing Occupational skills training Job search workshops Job placement assistance MFIP (Minnesota Family Investment Program) is a demonstration program that has computer selected families at random and will operate through 1999. MFIP replaces and combines four programs into one: AFDC (Aid For Dependent Children) FGA (Family General Assistance) Food Stamps STRIDE (employment and training) Some families already selected can be in MFIP only, or in a combination of STRIDE and MFIP programs. II -I d.. HOPE FSS Contract & Housing Vouchers (Metro HRA) What is FSS? • The Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) component of HOPE links housing assistan~e .(vouchers) with supportive services. The theme of FSS is to empower people to take control of then hves and become independent, productive members of their communities. What is the Benefit of FSS? • The main benefit of participation in FSS is Opportunity. Opportunity to move out of Section 8 "Projects" and into market rental units of your choice with a Section 8 Voucher. Opportunity to become independent of all forms of public assistance. Opportunity to stabilize family, further education, and develop, pursue, and accomplish realistic career plan. Opportunity to receive support services (daycare, transportation, etc.) that help you lead to " economic self-sufficiency." Opportunity to earn a savings account provided and funded by the Metro HRA. How Does FSS. Work? • Families must complete and sign an FSS Contract of Participation. The FSS Contracts include an Individual Training and Service Plan outlining how FSS will be achieved. The Plan must include: goals developed by the family in consultation with their STRIDE or JTPA case worker, a description of services to be provided to meet those goals, and a plan to meet with a support family as required by HOPE Program. What are the Terms of the FSS Contract? • Families must maintain a contract for the term of the FSS Program (5 years). Families who violate their contracts could lose their Voucher and the funds accrued in their escrow account. • Vouchers will be issued to families that successfully complete six months of their FSS contract. STRIDE and JTPA case workers will monitor progress in meeting FSS obligations and report back to the E.P. Housing and Social Services Committee. The Committee determines if a family is meeting its FSS obligations and if a Voucher should be issued. Families not receiving Vouchers after six months will be reevaluated in another six months. If at this time a family is still not meeting their goals and obligations, their contract will be terminated. Once a Voucher is issued the same monitoring arrangement will occur periodically to insure that families are fulfilling their obligations. How Does the Savings Account Work? • The savings is called an "Escrow Account" under the FSS Contract. The amount saved is based upon increases in earned income over five years -not increases in public assistance or welfare. Withdrawals from the account may be made only upon successful completion of the Contract. This includes termination of any public assistance (including AFDC, General Assistance, SSI, or similar programs). If approved by the Metro HRA, participants may be allowed to make an interim withdrawal consistant with their self-sufficiency plan. HOPE Family and Community Support (Mentoring) (Family to Family Ties) What is Family and Community Support? • Family and Community Support is a key component to the HOPE Program. It involves matching volunteer families with families participating in the HOPE Program for the purpose of providing friendship, encouragement, and overall support in their efforts to achieve self-sufficiency. Volunteer families will be available for the following activities: Monthly joint family fun activities such as, community park and recreation events, visiting the zoo, fishing, shopping, museum visits, picnics, board games at home, etc. Regular phone contact as expression of support to the participating families. Available for emotional support, affirmation, and creative problem solving during difficult periods, within limitations of volunteer's time and ability. Provide assistance in gaining information about and accessing community resources. Encouraging and assisting the participating family in advocating for their own needs. Assist the participating family in connecting with informal resources the volunteer may have to offer or have information about. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 12/5/95 SECTION: Commissions and Boards ITEMNO.~ ~. DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Heritage Site Recognition Program Recreation and Facilit~ Robert A. Lambert RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommend the City Council approve the establishment of the Heritage Site Recognition Program and adopt the marker designed for that purpose. Staff further recommends the City authorize funding of $2,556.45 for the purchase of 25 cast bronze markers and 25 site markers. Staff would recommend the Heritage Preservation Commission determine if any of the local service organizations are willing to fund this program through a one time expenditure of $2,550, and require the property owners to pay for the markers. This would ensure that the fund would remain intact and always be available for additional markers and would only be a one time expenditure for the service organization. PROCESS: The City recently completed a three-year cultural resources survey that evaluated sites throughout the City of Eden Prairie. Although, some property owners did not allow the consultants on their property , the majority of the sites in Eden Prairie have been reviewed City consultants through this survey. Telus Consultants completed the survey two years and Bear Creek Archaeology completed the survey in its third year. This survey identified over 200 sites that have some significance, although, less than half would meet the criteria to be designated as a heritage preservation site. The process for heritage site designation is as follows: 1. An application may be ftlled out by the property owner or by another individual for someones property. If the application for designation if ftlled out by someone other than the property owner, the property owner must be notified that his/her property is being considered for heritage site designation. The property owner must support the request prior to the next step. 2. The second step is for the application to be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission to determine if it is a significant site based on criteria listed on the application. The main criteria will be the information provided by the City Cultural Resources Survey. If the site has not been included in the Cultural Resources Survey, it would have to be surveyed by a qualified consultant to determine if it meets the criteria. If the HPC determines the site is significant it then forwards a recommendation to the City Council. 3. The final step in the process is for the City Council to review the application and the recommendation by the HPC, and take action to approve the site designation. Once the site is designated by the City Council the property owner has the right to choose the type of marker to be displayed at that site. The property owner would be responsible for purchasing the site marker and installing the marker on his/her property. BL:mdd 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: John Gertz, Preservation Specialist DATE: November 30, 1995 SUBJECT: Heritage Site Recognition Program BACKGROUND: One of the goals of the Heritage Preservation Commission for 1995 is to begin a landmark recognition program for heritage sites. Planning for this program started last spring and was recently completed with the fabrication of two site markers, both prototypes. One marker, intended for homes is made of cast bronze, the other, intended for roadside, park, and open space use is made of metal and is in color. Both share a common floral design selected by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The design itself was created by Pam Borgman, an Eden Prairie resident and artist who donated her time and talent to the project. The flower on the marker is the moccasin flower or stemless lady-slipper. The moccasin flower was once a common site in Eden Prairie's woodland areas, but now rare. Many of the City'S early residents remember it and identify the moccasin flower with the not too distant past. Also, the flower is generally recognizable to the public because it is related to the state flower, the showy lady-slipper. Most important of all is that as a simple icon, the design will work to identify any site within Eden Prairie. For example, it would be suitable to mark significant open space, a home, or even Native American archaeology sites where a more typical wagon wheel icon would be inappropriate. The commission spent considerable time in its selections of colors and materials. Cast bronze was chosen for homes because it is less obtrusive, rich in appearance, and surprisingly cost effective. Full color metal was chosen for roadside markers because they are more visible, less prone to vandalism, and easily installed. The City colors, blue and green, are used for the border, lettering and flower leaves, and the flower itself is a rose-purple. The program is intended to recognize significant buildings and places within Eden Prairie. Participation in the program is voluntary and carries no restrictions on the owner. The process to become a landmark is simple. Buildings, structures, and sites may be nominated for recognition by the owner or by another person or agency through an application process (see sample application). Nominations not supported by the owner will be withdrawn. 1 A landmark can be a residential or commercial building, structure, site, or an area which reflects elements of Eden Prairie's cultural, social, economic, political, or architectural history. The Heritage Preservation Commission will administer the Heritage Site Recognition Program. Once the commission determines that a site meets the criteria for recognition as a landmark the application would be forwarded to the City Council for official designation. It should be pointed out that this process is for recognition and is not the same as a City Council Resolution that establishes a designated heritage site. Any City designated site would of course be eligible for landmark recognition. Through recognition of Eden Prairie's landmarks the community can experience and celebrate the City's past. Through preservation these landmarks can be enjoyed by current residents and visitors as well as future generations. Site Marker Costs: Cast Bronze 7"xlO" With a 15 % preservation organization discount Quantities of 25 or more $43.00 each Total $1,075.00 Metal 12"x17" Quantities of 25 or more $59.25 each Total $1,481.25 Total Cast Bronze and Metal $2,556.25 REQUEST: The commission is requesting that the City Council approve to establish the Heritage Site Recognition Program and adopt the marker designed for that purpose. The commission and staff recommend the following options to fund the program: 1. The City Council approve to fund the program with the purchase of 50 (25 cast bronze, 25 metal) site markers. Cost: $2,556.25 2. The City purchase markers as above to take advantage of the quantity discount, then sell the markers at cost to property owners. 3. The City Council approve a cost-match program sharing half the cost with the property owner. 4. Direct the Heritage Preservation Commission to seek a grant or service organization donation to fund the program. 2 It is difficult to estimate the number of sites that could be recognized. Over 200 properties have been identified in recent cultural resources surveys. About 40-45 % might be considered for landmark recognition, most of them homes. Several sites are City owned so there would be a direct cost to the City for marking its own properties. CONCLUSION: Several members of the Heritage Preservation Commission will be available at the City Council meeting to answer any questions. Prototypes of the site markers, or plaques, will be on display. Also, the Commission recently reviewed and evaluated 11 properties, finding them significant. As required by City Ordinance 38-90, the Commission has prepared a Finding of Significance Statement for each property. The Finding of Significance Statement is the initial notification to the City Council from the Heritage Preservation Commission that a property has been evaluated, found significant, and may be recommended for designation. Lastly, the commission recently completed a grant project that resulted in the publication of a handbook. The book will be sold for $5 per copy to recover the cost of printing or provide for future printing. The handbook is intended as a reference tool, a study of how historic preservation works, and a guide to stewardship of the City's cultural resources. Nov15.memo 3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HERITAGE SITE PLAQUE APPUCATION FORM The Heritage Site Plaque program recognizes Eden Prairie's historically significant sites. To be eligible your home or property must meet all the criteria listed below. Help us put Eden Prairie's historical sites on the map. Actual size 10 "x 7'~ cast bronze. Plaque is on display at City Center. ••• LANDMARK YOUR HOME ••• Please check all applicable criteria. D Property has been included in the City's Cultural Resources Survey. D Property is unique; a visual landmark. D Property represents an important event, style, or character. ApplicantbUonnation Name ________________________________________ __ Address ______________________________ _ Telephone _________________________________ _ Property Description __ ----' ____________________________ _ For more information, please contact IlERrrAGE PREsERVATION COMMISSION 8080 MITCHEll ROAD • EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 • 949-8300 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 12/5/95 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO.::l[ C.I DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Recommendation Regarding Outdoor Recreation and Facilities Recreation Grant and Status of Klein/Peterson Parcel No.1 Option Robert A. Lambert ~ BACKGROUND: The City of Eden Prairie has an option agreement with the Klein family and Darril Peterson regarding two parcels of property located east of the 68-acre parcel the City is presently acquiring from the Kleins and Darril Peterson. The parcel titled Option No.1 is the 15.8 acre easterly most parcel, while the parcel titled Option No. 2 is the 30-acre parcel immediately east of the 68 acres the City is acquiring and west of Option Parcel No.1. The option for both parcels runs through the year 2000 and allows the City to acquire either parcel at $18,000/acre through 1995 with the cost per acre rising $1,000/acre each year during the five-year term of the option. The City obtained a $50,000 Outdoor Recreation Grant from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for acquisition of Option Parcel No.1. The grant requires the City to complete acquisition of the parcel by December 31, 1997. The grant application requests the City agree to the terms of the grant by December 8, 1995. City staff have expressed some concern with the acquisition of Option Parcel No. 1 due to the debris that has been placed in the northeastern ravine on that site and the erosion that is occurring in that ravine. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission toured the site on Saturday, November 18, 1995 to ensure they were aware of the condition of the property prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. One of the Commission members suggested requesting the property owners consider reducing the cost of Parcel No. 1 by the approximate one acre area of the ravine and to utilize the money saved to assist in restoring the ravine. Members of the Klein family and Darril Peterson agreed to that condition if the property were acquired at this time. RECOMMENDATION: At the November 20 meeting the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission discussed the pros and cons of acquiring Option Parcel No.1 at this time. Commission members noted the $50,000 grant versus the $284,000 cost and also weighed the number of requests the City was receiving for improvements to the park system and the number of expensive projects proposed by the Five-Year CIP over the next two to three years. The Commission was uncomfortable taking nearly all the cash park fees generated this year for the acquisition of this parcel when there are so many other projects necessary to keep the existing park system in good condition. The Commission ultimately recommended unanimously that the City Council return the grant to the State of Minnesota and delay the consideration 1 for acquisition of this parcel until a later time when some of the more immediate projects have been achieved. Commission members all strongly believe that the citizens of Eden Prairie should have an opportunity to vote on the acquisition of these parcels prior to when the option expires. Staff concur with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation and recommend delaying the acquisition of this parcel at this time. BL:mdd RecGrantlBob2 2 EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 21, 1995 Page 2 VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Option No.1 Klein/Peterson Property Lambert stated that he met with City Attorney Roger Pauly to discuss the potential liability for the City if the KleinlPeterson property were purchased because of the potential for further erosion on the property and Pauly believed that the City would not be liable because it was not something that the City or the present property owners have caused. Brown inquired if the City filled in the top with concrete and planted grass and trees, etc. if that would create a liability. Lambert responded that those would be measures to correct the erosion problem, not exacerbate it, and the City would not be liable in this instance, either. He discussed the tour taken by the Commission on November 18th and the suggestion that was made that the property except for the one acre containing the erosion could be purchased. With the $18,000 in funds which would have been spent to purchase that acre, corrective measures could be taken to correct the erosion problems. The City would plant vegetation to help correct the erosion problems and preserve the natural appearance of the ravine. Hilgeman commented that knowing the City was not liable for the erosion problems made the purchase more attractive and reasonable, particularly if the $18,000 was used to mitigate further erosion. Kracum commented he was concerned about public reaction to the purchase of additional bluff land, particularly when the property was so heavily eroded, as the referendum had been passed with the idea of preservation, not restoration. Jacobson inquired if the $50,000 grant funds were still available, and Lambert responded they were available until the end of the year. Jacobson commented that the $230,000 net cost to the City was slightly over two-thirds of the budget for this year, and he was not comfortable spending that much of their funding on this property. Kracum commented that a disclaimer should be placed on the property so that any purchases of land located above this area would be notified that there had been erosion on the property in the past so they would not be uninformed about this situation, but would know about it from the beginning. Hilgeman inquired if the two options were contingent upon each other, and Lambert responded negatively. He noted that it would be easier to -3- EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 21, 1995 Page 3 purchase Option #2 if Option #1 had been exercised, but there was no funding in the 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan for Option #2 so another referendum would be needed. He commented there were other needs in other parks in the City that needed to be considered as well. Many of these upgrades will cost $100,000 or more to accomplish. Hilgeman commented if the Commission decided not to exercise Option #1 they can wait five years and then put it on a referendum and let the citizens decide whether they want to acquire the land or not. She believed that the City should finish other projects before undertaking new ones. She was unsure whether additional bluff land was what the citizens of Eden Prairie wanted to acquire at this time. She was hearing that the citizens want more park amenities, more skating rink space, etc. She believed the City was overextended at this time and preferred to wait and see what the financial picture was in five years. Jacobson felt that the purchase should be postponed and the option could be exercised at a later time when the purchase would be more feasible. Brown commented he also heard citizens express concern regarding the need for more park amenities and he did not want to tell them they would have to wait five years until those things could be accomplished. He concurred with Jacobson that the purchase should be deferred until a later time. MOTION: Moved by Hilgeman, seconded by Koenig, to recommend to the City Council not to exercise Option #1 on the KleinlPeterson property at this time. Motion carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. None. VIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Jacobson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. -L/- EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 12-5-95 SECTION: REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ITEM NO. DEP ARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Possible Land Use Alternatives for Property at the Chris Enger Intersection of Cascade Drive, Dell Road, and Michael D. Franzen Highway 5 Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Recommend Alternative 2 -Office Retail or Alternative 3 -30,000 sq. ft. Office Building as a land use for the property at Cascade Drive and Dell Road. Background: The attached Staff Report analyzes 7 different land use alternatives for the property including retail, residential, and office. The staff recommends Alternative 2 -Office Retail or Alternative 3 -30,000 sq. ft. Office Building. Staff sent out notices to surrounding residents that the City Council will be discussing the land use alternatives. Supporting Reports: 1. Memorandum to Mayor and City Council 2. Letter to Residents MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner THROUGH: Chris Enger, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 30, 1995 SUBJECT: Possible Land Use Alternatives for Property at the Intersection of Cascade Drive, Dell Road, and Highway 5 Staff has prepared seven possible land use plans for the property. Two plans are commercial, three plans are office, and two plans are housing. The chart below compares the different alternatives: . : . .. PLAN DAILY .. :: . TREE· .. BLDG. CODE . BLDG. : DENSITY CODE· APPROX • . ... TRAFFIC toss HEIGHT . .SIZE .: •.. . LAND VALUE .. 1 1300 31% 20-28 ft. 30 ft. 15,000 .14 bar . 20 bar S6.00/sq. ft . 2 759 31% 20-28 ft. 30 ft. 15,000 .14 bar . 20 bar S6.00/sq. ft . 3 620 to 750 31% 30 ft. 30 ft. 30,000 .25 bar . 30 bar S5.00/sq. ft . 4 252 31% 45 ft. 45 ft. 55,000 10 units! acre 10 Sl-3.oo/sq. ft. units/acre 5 336 31 % 45 ft. 45 ft. 55,000 17.4 units! acre 17.4 SI-3.oo sq. ft. units/acre 6 1446 40% 30 ft. 30 ft. 58,800 .30 bar . 30 bar S5.00/sq. ft . .50 far .50 far 7 450 31 % 20-28 ft. 30 ft. 17,700 .15 bar . 30 bar S3.50/sq. ft . ALTERNATIVE 1-RETAIL This is similar to the developer's proposal. The square footage has been reduced by approximately 2,000 sq. ft. in order to provide room for a treatment pond. Buildings are one- story and small. This proposal has the 2nd highest traffic generation. ALTERNATIVE 2 -RETAIL/OFFICE This land use plan eliminates the 5,000 sq. ft. restaurant and substitutes a 5,000 sq. ft. office closer to Cascade Drive. This proposal has the same amount of retail as Alternative 1. Buildings are one-story and small. Traffic generation is 40% less than Alternative 1. 1 ALTERNATIVE 3 -TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING This proposal is a building of approximately the same size as a 12 unit Rottlund Townhouse. It is built within the same footprint area as the restaurant and retail. Traffic generation is 50% less the retail Alternative 1, but similar to retail Alternative 2. ALTERNATIVE 4 -36 UNIT CONDOMINIUM HOUSING This building is the same size as the 36 unit condominium building recently approved by the City Council on Franlo Road. Traffic would be 80% less than the retail and 33% trips less than the office proposal. More open space would be retained on the property since less parking is required. ALTERNATIVE 5 -48 UNIT LOW INCOME RENTAL HOUSING . This proposal could be built within the same footprint area as the 36 unit condominium building because the individual units would be smaller in size. The site plan is the same. Traffic generation would be 25% more than the 36 unit project, but 75% trips less than the retail and 44% less than the office proposal. ALTERNATIVE 6 -58,800 SO. FT. 3-STORY OFFICE BUILDING This proposal represents the maximum capacity of the site to support office under current office zoning requirements. Deck parking is necessary to meet the parking requirements. Tree loss would be higher because of a larger building footprint. Traffic generation is the highest of all alternatives. The building would be slightly larger than the two housing proposals. ALTERNATIVE 7 -17,700 SO. FT. -SINGLE STORY OFFICE This is the alternative proposed by the neighborhood. Traffic generation is low, and buildings are small and short. This plan is 50% of the building size allowed by City code. Due to the small amount of office in the plan, the value of the land is also lower. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Property rights of the owner, maximum development potential allowed by City code, impacts on surrounding land uses, and neighborhood desires must be taken into consideration when evaluating different alternatives. After evaluating these alternatives, staff believes that either Alternative 2 -Retail Office or Alternative 3 -Two-Story Office Building would be the better land uses for the property for the following reasons: • Since the City's Comprehensive Plan has denoted this area as Commercial, the value of the project to the developer needs to be taken into consideration. Either alternative, would give the developer a reasonable use of the property as allowed under the 2 Comprehensive Plan and as the developer had relied upon in the approved PUD. • Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 are plans which are not developed to the maximum allowed by City code. Alternative 2 is 70% of the code maximum. Alternative 3 is 50% of what is allowed for the base area ratio and 56% of what is allowed for total building square footage. • Alternative 2 and 3 represent a change in land use. The change in land use and less building square footage than allowed by City code results in less traffic impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. • The alternatives selected by staff represent a middle ground between the low intensity, low traffic desires of the neighborhood and the high intensity development and higher traffic generation which would occur if the property developed according to the code maximums. 3 8110 Blue Circle Dr. $\lito '100 WinDctoAka, Kilo. 55343 (012) a~-O$1~ Fax: (f512) a:SS-U63 o 1 ~ I. ~ I, ~ l; ~ ~: II " " I, 1\ ~ : l:j :: i I' 1 .' . ,I I' ~ 11 ~ :: ~ :: \I I. " II 6110 Blue Circle Dr. SUite 1100 Winn~to.Dk., 'Ka. 56343 (012) 8~-O$1~ Fax: (612) 933-11$:l o 2. -, '¥~~---:----_____ .. --41 _ .... -........ --......... -._ ... ---.... -----------.. -... -- ''l'.'/' /'" r -.. -..--.. -.. ------... --'if / /' _-----.-r-..:...... .. --.. ....-..-.. --;t-----or----- ,/ / ---------- /I, / 'il / f! ; / ,! t ' fr : ,/ .~ I / !; l(" :: ' .1 I ,I •. II I' II II " . J' II /, I. II I: I ~~~ ~I _L'·~ __ j:~--~~i=:---::~rt----It, I' -... -.."'" - 8110 Blue Circle Dr. $\lito 1100 WinnetoDka, lU:I.. $6S6S (012) a~-0072 Fax: (C512) 933-1163 3. o --..... -.. --~ _____ .. --. _ ... _ .... ___ ...--' __ .. _w---.----.-. .. ~ ___ -... --- '. -K--" 'l:Y~/ /.'1/ /' /7/ / 'I I / I, I t. : / I! i .. /' rr: F' '! 1 / ... J ~ :: :(' :: I I. t. : ~ :; ,I • . ' II ,. I. iI _---or - 8110 Blue Circle Dr. ~it.e 1100 Wi.nn~tonk., ~. 56343 (CH2) 9a:s-O$7~ Pax: (512) 9~-11~ 4. o 3t. cJtJlT ootJtbril~l\Jt-1 ttO()6I~ -,~-- '):t~/ ----_ .. ----_ ... ~---..... -.-.. ------.-----.. _----_ .. -~_ ........ --_. ---... -.. ------.... -.. -.. --r-.---P~.-... __::;f_-------- /.'1/ /' III '/ " // I, I.: / /! i ,/' .1 • I' • . ~ ~ /' :; l(" t: ~ ,I I " t, I: :i " , " II ,. I. II --~ - (SilO Blue Circle Dr. ~it.o '100 WinnetoDka. 'MA. 56343 (012) 9~-OQ1~ Fu: (612) 9e3-UI$:l. 5. o . ' . ..--. ----_.----_ ...... -_ ... _-_ ... -... ---... -----------_ .. -~-- ~.~--.-~.-~-- .~ ~,$o'~ ~.It " .'/ .. ""/ ,// ,r -.. ---.. -.. ---.. -... ~==:r-.-.-.,;:;-.. -.. "'"";I-----r----- ~. , / . 1/ / . -----" / ./ 'I I I I / t~ : / ,! I • ,,' / t", I '!l / ., J .. :: '(' I' • III .. I. II I' II 1/ . ~ ., J' It II ·f I· " .. '. iI :: ~d~~.~ ~, o -"' ... -- 8110 Blue Circle Dr. SUit.o '100 Wnn«tollka, 'Kll.. $5343 (612) 9~-O$1~ Fax: (CU2) 9=-116:1 58. eoo ~. F. 0 ff'llE.. .3 ~ro~--( ~-----. -.. -... -... -~.== ~-.----~--~-- .'", ;,~~,$."''''J "v/' ,/ I, / J/ / /l/ // '/ .' I, I / I, ~ / " ' "I /' II • t:. J ::; ./' :; !(' ,1 I ,1 t. II l' II I' . ~ " '0 It II I , .. , .. " II __ OI-J - tH to Blue Circle Dr. S\lit.o 1100 Winn<&tooka, 'W.Il.. 55343 (~1~) s~-o~m~ Fax: (612) 9::s:3-11o:l 7. o City of Eden Prairie City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Phone (612) 949-8300 • TDD (612) 949-8399 • Fax (612) 949-8390 November 30, 1995 SUBJECT: City Council Discussion of Land Use Alternatives for Dell and Highway 5 Dear Resident: The City Council will be discussing possible land use alternatives for the property located at the intersection of Cascade Drive, Dell Road and Highway 5 at the December 5th City Council meeting. If you have questions, or would like to review plans in advance of the meeting, please contact me at 949-8487. Michael D. Franzen City Planner Recycled Paper Administration City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, Mn. Dear Sir, 8933 Hilloway Rd. Eden Prairie, Mn. 55347 Dec. 1, 1995 I am unable to attend the City of Eden Prairie tax meeting on Dec. 06, 1995, due to my job. However, I would like to advise you of why I think my property taxes at 8933 Hilloway Rd. are not fair. As you may, or may not know, Hilloway Rd. is a private ~treet. Therefor~ the City of Eden Prairie spends NO MONEY on any of the following: 1. Street cleaning. 2. Snow plowing. 3. Pothole repair. 4. Oiling of the blacktop. 5. Repaving cost of Hilloway Rd. I do not think my taxes from the Citymof Eden ~rairie reflect the above street reductions and ask you to consider a correction to my property taxes. Thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely, I~ Michael D. Lubratovich