Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 11/21/1995
AGENDA CITY COVNCWSTAFF WORKSHOP TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1995 COUNClLMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: I. CALL TO ORDER 6:15 PM, CITY CENTER Heritage R.oom 8080 MitcheD R.oad Mayor Jean Banis, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorf"mnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra- Luke .. City Manager CarlJuIIie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Human ResoUl'US and Community Senices Natalie Swaggert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, and Director of Public Works . Gene Dietz n. DISCUSSION ON SELECTION PROCESS FOR. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS m. OTHER BUSINESS IV. ADJOURNMENT (7:15 PM). AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21,1995 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorf"mnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra- Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM m. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 7. 1995 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER by Tandem Development and Kindercare. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.75 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.75 acres, and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Site Plan Review for Dell Road and Highway 5 Commercial Center. Location: Dell Road and Highway 5. (2nd Reading of Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial and Planned Unit Development District Review, and Resolution for Site Plan Review) C. APPROVAL OF REOUEST FROM JAMES R. BAYER. TOURNAMENT DIRECTOR OF GIRLS SOFTBALL. TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO LIGHTS OUT POLICY AND PARK HOURS ORDINANCE AT MILLER PARK AND ROUND LAKE PARK AUGUST 7-11. 1996 City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 1995 Page Two D. RECEIVE PETITION AND APPROVE REQUEST FROM LECY CONSTRUCTION TO MOVE SCENIC EASEMENT LINE ON LOT 6. BLOCK 1. BLUFFS WEST E. APPROVE HENNEPIN PARKS REQUEST TO REMOVE DEER AT BRYANT LAKE PARK F. AMENDMENT TO FEE RESOLUTION TO REVISE FEES FOR PARK SHELTER RESERVATION DURING WINTER MONTHS G. AGREEMENT TO DEMOLISH THE PALM HOUSE AT 8510 FRANW ROAD AND ASSESS COST H. APPROVE BID FOR REPLACING DASHERBOARD SYSTEM IN RINK #1 AT EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER I. APPROVAL OF REOUEST FROM SupER VALU TO SUBSTITUTE A LETTER OF CREDIT ON THEIR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND V. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS A. GLEN LAKE GOLF AND PRACTICE CENTER by Hennepin County. Request for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres. Location: Crosstown at Indian Chief Road. B. EDEN HILLS CONDOMINIUMS by Brenwood Development Corporation. Request for Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way. Location: Franlo Road, south of Prairie Center Drive. (Resolution for Guide Plan Change, Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS vn. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Vill. PETITIONS. REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REQUEST FROM EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO REVIEW POSITION STATEMENT ON THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 21, 1995 Page Three XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTSOFCOUNC~MEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & FAC~ITIES 1. Recreation' Promm Fees Policy 2. Annrove Revised Concent Plan for Entry to Puraatory Creek Recreation Area 3. Art Center Location Options D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS xm. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTFS EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1995 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 8:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Ronald Case, Patricia Pidcock, Ross Thonmnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. All members were present I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Case added item XI.A.1. County Road 1 Speed Limit. Dietz added item XI.E.1. Update on Hennepin County Proposal Re&ardin& Solid Waste Disposal. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. OPEN PODIUM ill. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. OCTOBER 17. 1995 Case said Page 11, Paragraph 2, Sentence 2, should be changed to "within ten feet of the rear and the side yard lot lines." MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, October 17, 1995, as submitted and amended. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1995 Page 2 B. ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION Acceptance of formal withdrawal of Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition by 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation C. RESOLUTION 95-189 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FOREST HILLS 8TI1 ADDITION, located West of Baker Road and South of Theresa Place D. RESOLUTION 95-190 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF AZTEC DRIVE ADDITION, located along the East Side of TH 169/212 E. AUTHORIZE MAYOR & CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS AND EXECUTE DOCUMENTS FOR SALE OF PROPERTY TO MEDIA PLAY F. RESOLUTION 95-191 APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FOR SCHLAMPP'S WALNUT RIDGE G. RESOLUTION 95-192 APPROVING CONCURRENCE OF CSAH 18 DESIGNATION. I.C. 52-175 H. APPROVE SupPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.2 FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO TKDA FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITII TIlE WELL HOUSE AND WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION, I.C. 94-5356 and I.C. 94-5357 I. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/PRESERVE BOULEVARD. I.C. 94-5349 J. 1ST AND 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE 36-95 FOR STREET NAME CHANGE FROM FOSSIL ROAD TO BOULDER POINTE ROAD K. 1ST AND 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE 37-95 FOR STREET NAME CHANGE FOR A PORTION OF CITY WEST PARKWAY TO OLD SHADY OAK ROAD L. RESOLUTION 95-193 RECEIVING 100% PETITION FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WITHIN PAFKO 2ND ADDITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. I.C. 96-5396 M. REQUEST BY MARSHALL'S FOR A LAND ALTERATION PERMIT AT TIlE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PIONEER TRAIL AND COUNTY ROAD ~ MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve items A - M of the Consent Calendar Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1995 Page 3 V. PUBLIC HEARINGSlMEETINGS A. V ALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE n by Design I of Edina. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres and Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres for a 6,400 sq. ft. office building. Location: 9973 Valley View Road (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District) Robert Davis, representing Design I, reviewed the proposal. Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the project at their October 9, 1995, meeting and recommended approval on a unanimous vote, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of October 6, 1995. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close the Public Hearing; to approve the I st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District; and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. B. VACATION 95-08 Part of Drainage and Utility easements in Woodland Ponds of Eden Prairie (Resolution 95-194) City Manager Jullie said the engineering staff is recommending approval of this request for vacating an easement. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing; to adopt Resolution 95-194 for Vacation 95-08, vacating part of drainage and utility easements in Woodland Ponds of Eden Prairie. Motion carried unanimously. C. 1995 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING (Resolution 95-195) Continued from October 17, 1995 Jullie said there is some follow-up work with a couple of assessments remaining from the October 17th meeting. City Engineer Gray asked the Council to reconsider I. C. 52-067 in order to levy the assessment and defer it without interest. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reconsider I. C. 52-067. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1995 Page 4 MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved to approve I.C. 52-067 with the understanding the assessment relating to parcel PID 02-116-22-11-0002 be approved with the interest to be deferred until the property is developed. Motion died for lack of a second. Dietz said the total assessment is $33,430.04 against the property, $18,430.04 of which will be deferred. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve I.C. 52-067 with the understanding the $18,430.04 of deferred assessments on the Helen Pavelka property will be deferred until development. Motion carried unanimously. Gray said I.C. 93-5312 was continued at the October 17 meeting. Gray noted that Dr. Robert Wetmore objected to his assessment at that meeting. Staff received documentation from U.S. Homes that indicates there is an escrow account that will cover Dr. Wetmore's assessment. Gray said the storm sewer assessment included was a concern for Bearpath. Staff believes the assessments are consistent with the development agreement and the assessment agreement with Bearpath. John Vogelbacher, Project Manager for Bearpath, requested they be treated fairly regarding how the assessments for storm sewer and Dell Road are being charged. He said they paid for the portion of storm pipe through Dell Road and for oversizing. He stated about $40,000 of the assessment is for boulevard and median seeding and restoration on Dell Road; however, only $15,000 has been paid to the contractor of the project. He objected to being assessed for costs that were not paid and noted no portion of that cost is attributable to the over sizing of the road. He said they asked staff to have the City develop a landscape plan for all of Dell Road from Highway 5 to County Road 1 and have not seen any specifications for such improvements. Gray said he thought we can work with the developers to resolve the problems regarding landscaping for Dell Road and other areas in the City. Harris asked if we have any written agreement that relates to the landscaping. Gray replied we have no understanding in the development or assessment agreements; however, there were discussions between the two staffs regarding some type of proposal where we might put some upgraded landscaping into this contract. He said it was determined such an agreement might be unfair to others and it would be difficult to explain why this development had a special agreement regarding the landscaping maintenance. Gray said they have paid only $15,000 of the landscaping costs because the work has not been very acceptable to this point. What we assess Bearpath is a function of the assessment agreement, and we will determine a theoretical cost for a 32- foot roadway based on what would ordinarily be the full construction. CITY COUNCIL MINUTFS November 7, 1995 Page 5 Dietz said we did promise to look at and develop a landscaping plan by year end for Dell Road from County Road 1 to the elevated water tank. He said we would review the plan with Bearpath and consider other things they would like. Harris asked if we would do this within the context of Gray's suggestion regarding a total plan for the City. Dietz replied it would probably be just Dell Road in order to complete it by year end. Gray said we had a well-defined corridor for the construction of Dell Road before Bearpath was developed. The developer of Bearpath needed to revise the corridor and needed an agreement with the landowner to the east, U.S. Homes, to revise the alignment of Dell Road. Gray described the agreement with U.S. Homes and Bearpath and said the storm sewer assessment is being split in accordance with the development agreement with U.S. Homes and Bearpath. Harris asked if U.S. Homes is bearing part of the cost. Gray said they are. Pidcock said a lot of other concessions were made to Bearpath. We have never been unfair to Bearpath, and to her the assessments seem very logical and fair. Vogelbacher said of the four locations of storm drainage that come off Dell Road, three come on to Bearpath and one to Dellwood. He said there is a gray area in the development agreement that indicates the cost of storm water is part of the street construction. They have improvements on the property that could be attributed to Dell Road costs. They object to the fact there were agreements made that affected the cost of the road They would like to get a credit for the public improvements that they put in that would be attributable to Dell Road. Pidcock said we allowed Bearpath to put in roads that were less than the size in similar developments in other parts of the City because they would be private roads. She was concerned about the City having to maintain them at some time in the future. Vogelbacher said he thought the landscaping issue is being dealt with. The contract price for a 72-foot roadway at $40,000 and he did not understand how it relates to a 32-foot roadway. Thorfinnson said the cost is an incremental cost for a 32-foot road. Tyra-Lukens said the original assessment agreement estimated the cost at $394,000 and the proposed assessment is $383,000. She asked what Vogelbacher saw as an appropriate adjustment. Vogelbacher said the cost of the storm sewer project attributed back to the Dell Road project was $26,000 to pay for the pipe that went from Dellwood to Dell Road. He said they paid for part of that pipe and they are asking for the same calculation on their property. Harris said there is a written agreement which deals with drainage and assessments that were agreed to by all parties. Vogelbacher said he didn't think there is anything in the developer's agreement that addresses these issues. It CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1995 Page 6 discusses building NURP ponds but not the cost of piping. Gray stated the assessment agreement specifically says the storm sewer costs are to be assessed to the properties adjoining Dell Road. He said the development agreement relies on Exhibit B which is a drawing showing the storm sewer outlets and ponds. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing; and to adopt Resolution 95-195 approving the assessments as proposed for I.C. 93- 5312, Dell Road Street and Utility Improvements to the subdivisions of Bearpath, Dellwood Estates, and Big Woods. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Harris questioned item 35733 to "Executive Director". Jullie replied this is the payment for PERA and they have requested it be made out that way. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call Yote, with Case, Pidcock, Thonmnson, Tyra-Lukens and Harris Yoting "aye." vu. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VID. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. SENIOR ISSUES TASK FORCE -2nd Quarterly Report Bette Anderson presented the 2nd Quarterly Report of the Seniors Issues Task Force (SITF). They are identifying the demographics and the needs of the senior population in 2015 -2020. They have looked at housing issues in terms of what types of housing will be needed. There will be a need for convenience centers within walking or short driving distance for residents of senior housing developments. They have concentrated on transportation issues for the frail elderly. The Housing, Transportation and Social Services Commission is planning a questionnaire survey of the community and has involved the SITF in the question preparation. Case said he was particularly impressed by the preliminary estimate that the senior age population will match or exceed the school age population by the year 2020. Harris noted that bringing parents to the area may increase the number of seniors. Pidcock asked how the Task Force is recommending the transportation for frail elderly be tackled. Anderson said new buses on Southwest Metro have lifts; however, there are some outstanding customer service issues with Southwest Metro. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1995 Page 7 Case noted there are a lot of services out there, but we need a clearing house to coordinate activities. Thorfinnson said the survey to be done by the HTSS Commission should help us move toward the point where we are determining what the needs are for human services. X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. County Road 1 Speed Limit Case said he gets calls weekly on the 50 MPH speed limit on County Road 1. He asked Gene Dietz to review the process required to change the speed limit. Dietz said staff determined that we have had speed studies in 1991, 1992 and 1994 on County Road 1, and each time they came back with 50 MPH. He said they might consider a decrease to 45 MPH, based on the lower speed limits in neighboring communities. He suggested we put together a resolution for the next meeting that would request a speed analysis and set a speed consistent with speeds outside Eden Prairie for the same roadway. Tyra-Lukens asked if the entire roadway has to have the same speed limit. Dietz said the most recent study was for the entire roadway. Tyra-Lukens suggested limiting the study to the eastern portion if that would make it more likely to get a change. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to direct staff to draft a request for a speed evaluation on County Road 1 and return to the next Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Family Services Collaborative Proposal Jullie reviewed the memo of October 7, 1995, describing the network of family support resource centers being proposed by the Family Services Collaborative (FSC) to increase access and simplify the process of linking families and children to needed support services. They are asking for a commitment of 120 hours of staff time to support Phase 1 of the study which goes through June 1, 1996. Tyra-Lukens asked if we will have a good evaluation of the services up to the point at which the evaluation proposed by the grant proposal occurs. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 7, 1995 Page 8 Thorfinnson said we had to submit the grant proposal before October 1 even though we were not at a point where every detail was defmed; however, we will be in a position to make sure we can evaluate the services by next June. He added each participating community has a resource center with a central hub. We will be able to evaluate our resource center and how the network is working. Bette Anderson stated there will be two kinds of evaluation--evaluation of customer satisfaction with the services and evaluation of the FSC resource centers' meeting the goals of the community. She said we need to have a group establish our goals. Thorfinnson said there is already a substantial amount of staff time going into SHeRPA so there will not be much of a change as far as staff commitment is concerned. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve Eden Prairie's participation in Phase I (through June of 1996) of the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative, including approval of Eden Prairie's in-kind contribution of 120 hours of Staff time for Phase I implementation. Motion carried unanimously. C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & FACILITIES 1. Art Center Lease A&reement Referring to the staff report of November 7, 1995, Jullie said we have received a letter of intent to enter into a purchase agreement for the old police department site at a price that is reasonably close to our asking price. Staff needs additional time to review the offer. Jullie asked the Council to authorize a contract with Sterling Group at a cost of $3,200 to review the offer and report back at the 2nd meeting of December with a recommendation for a counter offer and a final purchase agreement price. He said staff is continuing to work with the Staring Arts Group since the police department building will not be available. They have looked at the Riley/Jacques property and the Senior Center is available. Harris was pleased with the opportunity to sell the police station; however, she was concerned about how to maintain the momentum of the Staring Arts Group. Pidcock questioned the need to use the Sterling Group to review the offer. She thought staff has done a very good job of getting a potential buyer for the property. Enger said they see a role for a private group to assist in evaluating the proposal and to provide information in terms of the climate in the private market as well as a second check on the asking price for the property. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 7, 1995 Page 9 Harris asked if additional responsibilities would change the contract. Enger said they would try to work within the amount and would suggest that the contract amount be worded to not exceed $3,200. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to authorize staff to contract with the Sterling Group at a cost not to exceed $3,200 to review the purchase offer for the police department building. Motion carried unanimously. Pat Beckmann, representing the Staring Arts Group, said the Jacques property has some potential but it is quite restricted. It is a two story home with steep stairs and the location is off the beaten track. They would like something more centrally located. Case asked if they could use the out buildings. Beckmann said the barn is a great space but would take a tremendous amount of money to remodel for their use. Beckmann asked if it would be possible for the Staring Arts Center to purchase the Boyce house from the City without purchasing the property. Case asked if it is too late to stop the demolition of the building so we could address the idea of a temporary location for the arts group in the house. Jullie said we are under contract for the demolition which has been somewhat prolonged because of the asbestos located in the structure. Harris said she would have a concern about their using the house if there is a problem with asbestos. Harris was concerned the house has not had adequate maintenance. Case was concerned, if we can't let them have the Boyce property, we need to get serious about helping them find something else. Pidcock thought we should investigate their buying the building and see what the legal ramifications would be to the City of leasing the land to them. Harris was concerned it would remain a liability to the City and was not convinced the cost of restoration would be any cheaper for them than for the City. Harris asked staff to rigorously pursue a home for the Staring Arts Center and to come back in two weeks with options. D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEWPMENT 1. Resolution for Participation Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Enger reviewed the proposed resolution authorizing our participation in CITY COUNCIL AGENDA November 7, 1995 Page 10 the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act for calendar year 1996. The resolution is conditioned to provide us an opportunity to "opt-out" if reasonable housing goals cannot be negotiated with the Metropolitan Council. It is centered around the concept that we will not be held accountable for those things that are out of our control. Enger met with four Met Council staff members last week and asked them not to saddle us with the numerical goals. Pidcock said she understood Habitat for Humanity is looking for a piece of property and asked if there is any property available for them. Enger said they have given some thought to Habitat's request and are looking into whether Hennepin County is willing to participate in the Livable Communities by making some tax forfeiture land available. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfmnson, to adopt Resolution 95-196 approving City participation in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act for 1996. Motion carried unanimously. E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Update on Hennepin County Proposal Re&ardin& Solid Waste Disposal Dietz said Hennepin County held a Public Hearing on this matter and will begin to charge for the disposal of solid waste. It will be a separate line item on the tax bill. The fee will be $28.50 for an average $150,000 house. F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY xu. OTHER BUSINESS Xill. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 10:25 p.m. er-: DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ...-alil SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR 11-21-95 . DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: lTEMNO. Finance -Pat Solie CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST IV.A THESE LICENSES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTr·1ENT HEADS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LICENSED ACTIViTY. PLUMBING I \ Gertman Mechanical Gilpin Plumbing, Inc - . - ... . -ActiOn/Direction: I , . F ~ 11-21-95 page 1 .. ," .,",';' -:" . . ,. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-21-95 SECTION: 2ND READING ITEM NO. N B. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chr:js Enger DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL Mike Franzen CENTER Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.75 acres and PUD District Review on 1.75 acres; • Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.75 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial . 2. Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement JJL. g. -/ DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 35-95-PUD-17-95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Planned Unit Development Neighborhood Commercial 35-95-PUD-17-95 (hereinafter "PUD-17-95-Neighborhood Commercial"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of November 21, 1995, entered into between Tandem Development and Kindercare, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the tenns and conditions ofPUD-l7-95-Neighborhood Commercial, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-17-95-Neighborhood Commercial is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-l7-95-Neighborhood Commercial is designed in such a manner to fonn a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-17-95-Neighborhood Commercial are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-17-95-Neighborhood Commercial is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. .IJ[ 13. -z. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-17-95-Neighborhood Commercial and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of October, 1995, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 21 st day of November, 1995. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ---------------------------------- DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Dell Road and Highway 5 from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.75 acres; subject to the tenns and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the fun legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. IslJean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _________ ' (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) TIL 8. -L/ Exhibit A Legal Description Dell Road and Highway 5 Commercial Center Outlot A, Jamestown of Eden Prairie, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER BY TANDEM DEVELOPMENT AND KINDERCARE WHEREAS, Tandem Development and Kindercare has applied for Site Plan approval of Dell Road and Highway 5 Commercial Center on 1.75 acres for construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. Kindercare located at Dell Road and Highway 5; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its September 25, 1995, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its October 17, 1995, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Dell Road and Highway 5 Commercial Center for the construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. Kinderc are , based on plans dated November 21, 1995, between Tandem Development and Kindercare, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 21, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 1JL 6. -b DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of ,19-, by Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation and Kindercare, a Georgia Corporation, hereinafter jointly referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for a Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 1.75 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.75 acres, Preliminary Plat of 4.47 acres into 2 lots, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 1.75 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.75 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A. attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage her~inafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial and Planned Unit Development District Review and Resolution No. , Preliminary Plat, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review and Resolution . No. for Planned Unit Development Concept Review. Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated , reviewed and approved by the City Council on , and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. :nr ~. -7 4. CROSS PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's approval of cross-parking and maintenance agreement for the Property. The agreement shall address access, and maintenance of parking facilities and storm water facilities. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall record said cross-access, parking and maintenance agreement in the Hennepin County Recorders-Registrar Office and submit evidence of recording to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved exterior materials and colors plan concurrent with building construction on the Property and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. FINAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading plan for the Property. The final grading plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading plan. Developer shall implement the approved plan .prior to, or concurrent with building construction. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 7. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the wooded areas on the property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a plan depicting the construction grading limits on the property. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit, Developer shall place a construction fence at the limits of the proposed grading as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester. 8. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. 11L 6. -8 Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved irrigation plan concurrent with construction and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a fmallandscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials as shown on the landscape plan as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City code. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved landscape plan concurrent with building construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 10. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. Said mechanical equipment includes the gas meters, electrical conduit, and water meters in addition to standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, per City Code requirements. Developer shall implement the approved plan concurrent with building construction. If, after completion of construction of said mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen said equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to meet Code requirements. Developer acknowledges that City will not release the security provided until all such corrective measures are satisfactorily completed by Developer. 11. TREATMENT PONDS: Prior to final plat approval on the property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and the City Planner and receive their approval of plans and design information for all storm water quality facilities to be constructed. The approved treatment pond plan shall be constructed as shown on Exhibit B concurrent with the construction of the Kindercare on Lot 2. 12. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the Neighborhood Commercial District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD_ A. Waiver from minimum lot size requirement of 2 acres to 1.75 acres. 13. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, and obtain the Director's approval of detailed plans for sidewalks and trails to be constructed on the Property. Developer shall provide access easements, as determined by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Director. Said sidewalks and trails shall be constructed in the following locations: A. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail to be located on the north side of Cascade Drive as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, Developer agrees to construct, or cause to be constructed, said sidewalks and trails, concurrent with street construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. Bonding in accordance with City code shall be required for sidewalk construction on Cascade Drive. 14. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each and every sign to be located on the property, Developer, shall file an application with the City Planner for a sign permit. Said application shall include a complete description of the sign and a plan showing the size, location, and manner of construction, consistent with the sign plan shown on Exhibit B and in accordance with the requirements of City code, Section 11.70, Subdivision 5a. 15. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 646 inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 250 inches. Tree replacement required is 128 inches. Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a tree replacement plan for 128 inches. Said plan shall include replacement trees of a 3 inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a seven foot minimum height for conifer trees. Upon approval by the City Forester, Developer agrees to implement or cause to be implemented the tree replacement plan for 128 caliper inches prior to building permit issuance. 16. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a detailed plan for site lighting. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer shall implement the approved lighting plan concurrent with building construction. 17. TRASH ENCLOSURE: Developer has submitted to the City Planner, and obtained City Planner's approval of a plan for the design of the outside trash enclosure for the property. Said trash enclosure shall be constructed with facebrick to match the building, include a roof, and heavy duty steel gates that completely screen the interior of the enclosure. Developer shall implement the trash enclosure plan concurrent with building construction. 18. LANDSCAPING ON SOUTH SIDE OF CASCADE DRIVE: Developer agrees that the proposed conifer trees on the south side of Cascade Drive as shown on Exhibit B shall be 1JL B. -}O installed concurrent with the construction of the proposed Kindercare building. Said conifer trees are required to meet City code requirements for screening and tree replacement for Lot 1 and Lot 2. 19. DRIVEWAY TURNAROUND ON SOUTH SIDE OF CASCADE DRIVE: Developer agrees that the proposed driveway turnaround on the south side of Cascade Drive as shown on Exhibit B be constructed current with the construction of the proposed Kindercare building. Developer agrees to meet with the property owner on which the proposed driveway turnaround is to be built to verify location, size, and construction details prior to construction. Approval of the driveway turnaround by the City Planner is required prior to construction. 20. RIGHT TURN LANE ON CASCADE DRIVE: If after a review of traffic volumes expected to be generated by the future development of Lot 1, it is determined by the City Engineer that a right-turn lane on the north side of Cascade Drive is required, then Developer agrees to construct the right turn lane concurrent with the development or construction on Lot 1. TJ[ B. -I) EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM. NO. IV. C DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request from James R. Bayer, Girls Softball Recreation and Faciliti~ Association Tournament Director to Grant a Variance to Lights Out Policy Robert A. Lambert 'IjJ/' for Miller Park and Round Lake Park August 7-11, 1996 Attached to this memorandum is a letter dated October 5, 1995 from James R. Bayer, Girls Softball Association Tournament Director for the 1996 ASA-USA 18-and-Under Girls Fastpitch National Championships from August 7-11, 1996 at Miller and Round Lake Parks. Mr. Bayer is requesting the City consider granting a variance to the 10 p.m. lights out policy and City ordinance on park hours for the national tournament to be held in Eden Prairie August 7-11, 1996. The letter describes the steps the association has taken to ensure that all games will be over by 10 p.m. However, there is a slight chance some games could last several extra innings that could take a game beyond the 10 p.m. time when lights are turned off in all parks. City staff have notified residents around the southern half of Round Lake Park, where there are lighted softball fields, and around Miller Park to inform residents that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will be discussing this request at the November 6 meeting. City staff identified several concerns with the request in a letter to Mr. Bayer. Staff was concerned that if the City extends the lights out policy to 11 p.m. it is likely that there won't be the urgency to stay on schedule and stay within the 10 p.m. goal. Staff was also concerned that the City would be making this request during the first summer of full operation of the ballfields at Miller Park, when we had promised the neighbors that we would hold to the 10 p.m. lights out rule no matter what the pressure would be to extend it. Staff occasionally receive requests to extend the lights out policy and consistently turned down those requests. City staff is suggesting the Commission and Council consider this request because it is the first time a national tournament has been hosted in Eden Prairie and this is not something that would occur on a regular basis. RECOMMENDATION: City staff are recommending the Council authorize extending the time lights could be turned off to 10:30 p.m. This would not mean that lights would remain on until 10:30 p.m. on all fields, but only a field where extra inning games have caused the need for the extension. Staff is recommending this variance for several reasons: 1. The extra 30 minutes will accommodate several extra innings of any softball game that begins at 7:45 p.m. 2. If a game lasts until 10:30 when lights would go out, it is another 30 minutes before the park would be cleared. During that clear out time there is often a lot of noise, car traffic, etc. that can cause an impact on the adjacent residential neighborhood. Staff is not comfortable 1 suggesting the adjacent neighborhood to that type of noise and disruption after 11:00 p.m. on weekday evenings for any reason. 3. If umpires were instructed not to start another inning after 10 p.m. it would allow time for players, coaches, and spectators to leave the facility with the lights on until 10:30 p.m. 4. Staff believe the majority of the residents around Miller Park would understand the request for an additional half hour for this national tournament and will be more likely to put up with the additional traffic, noise, and congestion if it is only a half hour later in the evening, rather than a full hour. City staff anticipate there will be a high number of upset residents in the southwest quadrant during the week of August 7-11 due to traffic congestion. If too many lose additional sleep as well as experience some delays in getting to and from their homes, the City may have a difficult time authorizing any variances in the future. Mr. Bayer has been informed of the staff recommendation and appreciates and supports the consideration for a 30-minute variance. BL:mdd variance/Bob 2 October 5, 1995 Bob Lambert Director, Parks and Recreation City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Lambert, 1996 ASA-USA IS-and-Under Girls Fastpitch National Championships 7335 Scot Terrace, Eden Prairie, MN 55346 As you know, Bob, Eden Prairie will host the 1996 ASA • USA 18-and-Under Girls Fastpitch National Championships from August 7 to 11, 1996, at Miller and Round Lake parks. Excite- ment about this even is building across the Twin Cities and Minnesota and plans are well underway. I want to address one issue with you early in the process to see if we can't come to an agree- ment. First my request. I am requesting your office or the City Council approve an 11 p.m. lights-out variance for Tuesday, August 6, at the EPHS Football Stadium only for opening ceremonies and a player/ coach welcoming party; and Wednesday, August 7, through Saturday, August 10,1996 at Miller and Round Lake parks for game play. Here's some background that I think is helpful in explaining our reasons for making the re- quest. 1) Even with a variance, our goal is to end all games by 10 p.m. 2) Initially, games were to begin at 9 a.m. each day, with final games beginning at 8 p.m. To improve our chances of achieving our 10 p.m. goal, we have moved starting times up to 8 a.m. and, depending on scheduling variations, will start all final games by 7:45 p.m. 3) This summer at the Regional Tournament, a cruicial game went into extra innings. We had committed to turning lights out at 10 p.m. and were prepared to do so. Umpires had been told before the tournament started about the lights-out policy. Coaches were reminded at 9:45 p.m. Eden Prairie -Host of the 1996 ASA • USA 18-and-Under Girls Fastpitch National Championships that the game would be intelTUpted at the end of the next inning if no winner had been de- cided. The game ended dramatically at 9:59. And, even though your city crew member left a bank of lights on facing south, when the lights went out, we had a number of very angry people in our faces (as you can guess, most of them were from the losing team). Initially, the darkness was startling. And even though eyes adjusted within minutes to the remaining lights, the fact that we had to rush these people out was unfortunate. Obviously, we would like to avoid similar problems during the national tournament, when competitive levels will be even higher. 4) To accommodate an 11 p.m. lights-out, we will again inform all coaches and umpires at the beginning of the tournament and remind umpires before the beginning of the final games of the night. Umpires will be instructed not to start another inning after 10:30 p.m., allowing time for players, coaches and spectators to leave the facility with lights still on. 5) As tournament director, I am planning an aggressive campaign aimed at the residents adjacent to both parks. The goal of the campaign will be to inform them about the tournament and its magnitude, to involve them in tournament activities, such as inviting them to attend opening ceremonies and, perhaps, providing each household with a tournament pass and food coupons. If approved, I would also inform them about the lights-out variance. We need to put on the best tournament possible, and the latitude the lights-out variance would be extremely helpful. At the same time, we need the support of the neighbors surrounding those ballparks and we are willing to take extensive steps to help make that happen. Finally, Bob, I ask that you support this request. I am aware of the pressure you and your staff and the City Council face on occasion about these kinds of things. At the same time, I am confident that when the people affected understand the importance of this event -not just to the city, but to the young women of Eden Prairie -that they will support this brief variance. I do not intend to make this a "we versus them" issue. I believe it's a reasonable request and that reasonable people will understand and accept it. I and other members of the National Tournament Organizing Committee are more than will- ing to meet with you or go before the Park Board or City Council to explain our position, if necessary. I also want to tell you that our group appreciates very much the input and assistance we have received from Laurie Helling and Bob Lanzi, both of whom have acted as city liaisons to the National Tournament Committee. Their expertise is invaluable to us. Thank you for your consideration, Bob, and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ~\~ James R Bayer Tournament Director 853-8549 (weekdays) 942-5209 ( evenings/ weekends) EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 2 IV. PETITIONS. REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from James R. Bayer. Tournament Director to Grant a Variance to Lights Out Policy at Miller Park and Round Lake Park August 7-11, 1996 Robert Lambert reviewed the October 30, 1995 staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of the variance request to keep the lights on until 10:30 p.m. James Bayer, Tournament Director, indicated he was in agreement with the 10:30 p.m. time limit for the lights to remain on, as recommended by staff. Bowman inquired why the games could not be scheduled so they were completed by 9:30 p.m. Bayer responded they hope to be done by then but there is always the possibility that the games could run later. They are requesting the 10:30 p.m. time limit as a cushion to allow the participants and spectators time to leave the fields after the games have concluded for the evening, rather than have the lights go out immediately at the conclusion of the games and people find their way to their cars in the darkness. He noted this is a national tournament for 18 and under players, and they do anticipate that some games may run longer than 10:00 p.m. They have stipulated that they will not begin a new inning after the 10:00 p.m. time limit. Bowman commented he would like to see that the tournament run in such a manner so that the games are finished by 10:00 p.m. Hilgeman inquired if the residents were being involved in the tournament plans, and Bayer responded affirmatively, noting they will send letters inviting adjacent residents to attend the games. Staff commented that residents adjacent to Miller Park and on the south side of Round Lake Park had been notified of the proposed time change, and only two calls had been received One of the callers was in support of the tournament, but was concerned that the time change did not set a precedent, and the other caller was present at the meeting to voice her concerns. Cheryl Potter, Bay Road, was concerned about having the games stay contained within the 10:00 p. m. time frame and asked if the Commission would consider moving up the time cushion period from 9:30-10:00 p.m. Brown inquired what would happen in the event a game was tied, the time was 10:00 p.m. and they could not start another inning. Bayer responded that they would undoubtedly have some disgruntled people, but would reschedule the game for the following day. His intent was to attempt to avoid this situation occurring if at all possible. He commented that if it appeared that games were running behind schedule, they had the opportunity to move games to the next day to avoid the problem of games running over the time frames. Brown inquired why the tournament was not scheduled to begin earlier in the day, and Bayer responded -5- EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 6 MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Kracum seconded, to recommend approval of the request of Hennepin County to remove 10 deer from Bryant Regional Park, with the stipulation that the Eden Prairie Police Department be notified when sharpshooting would occur. Motion carried unanimously. D. Reguest for Pool Use from Foxjet Swim Club Lambert reviewed the request of the Foxjet Swim Club to rent the Community Center Pool on Friday, January 19, 1996 from 4:30 to 9:30 p.m. for the purpose of holding a swim meet. This will impact the open swim hours for that day, but the revenues from the swim meet exceed that projected from the open swim. Signs would be posted at the Community Center to notify the public of the cancellation or reduction of public use hours, and the monthly pool hours calendar will reflect the change in hours. Hilgeman commented she believed this was a reasonable request, but she was concerned about inconveniencing the public. Signs are not always seen by the public, and there are always people who don't know about these events who complain later. She inquired if there was some way that people who were inconvenienced could be recompensed. Laurie Helling responded that when they don't get signs up in time or notices published in the paper, they do give people free passes, etc. as compensation. However, this swim meet is far enough in advance so that they will be able to post notices and publish it in the paper. Brown inquired how many times they close the pool for swim meets, etc. and Helling responded that three to five times a year. She noted that open swim attendance varies from season to season, and there was no adequate way to predict how many swimmers would be impacted. Brown inquired if there was some other time to hold the swim meet and Lambert responded that most of the kids at the swim meet would be from Eden Prairie anyway, as it was a local swim club event. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Koenig, to recommend approval of rental of the Community Center Pool for the Foxjets to conduct a swim meet on January 19, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. v. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Glen La·ke Golf and Practice Center by Hennepin County Paul Miller, representing Williams Gill & Associates, reviewed the proposal and noted that it would be a championship quality golf course, but was designed as an executive golf course. There will be nine holes, with the first seven holes EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. JlC. D DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPfION: Petition from Lecy Construction to Move Recreation and FaCi1i~ Scenic Easement Line on Lot 6, Block 1 Bluffs West Robert A. Lambert Attached to this memorandum is a memorandum from Stuart Fox outlining the request from Lecy Construction, as well as a letter from Mark Lecy of Lecy Construction requesting the City modify the conservation easement on Lot 6, Block 1 Bluffs West 11th Addition. Also, attached to the memo is a copy of the of November 6 minutes of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission regarding this request. RECOMMENDATION: City staff concur with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation to approve the request for the modified easement vacation with the stipulation that the lot line be extended in a straight line from the house until it meets the adjacent property line, eliminating the proposed triangular portion in the southeast corner, and subject to the stipulation contained in the November 2, 1995 staff memorandum. The line recommended by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission is the solid south property line depicted in the Exhibit titled Map 2. BL:mdd Attachments: Memo from Stuart Fox Lecy.memo/Bob2 Minutes -November 6, 1995 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Letter from Lecy Construction Map #2 1 ( ( • '- Lot 6 -42,646 sq.ft. Existing scenic/conservation easement· 30,080 sq. ft. = 71% of lot Proposed scenic/conservation easement vacation· 2,700 sq. ft. Revised scenic/conservation area· 27,380 sq. ft.= 64% Map 2 ------.. ..:.-------. scale 1"= 40" EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 3 that while there was no ASA regulation requiring a particular starting time, coaches and teams usually practiced before the games, and were counting on having that time to warm up beforehand. If the games were scheduled earlier, it would encroach into that time, and he did not believe that the coaches and players would be too pleased with that. Jacobson inquired why the last game could not be started at 7:00 p.m. instead of 7:45 p.m. Bayer responded that they are changing the time frames for the games so that the final game will begin by 7:45 p.m. He explained that earlier times would require them to use more fields to play the tournament, which would require more expenses and maintenance, and it would become more intensive than proposed. Potter inquired why they did not just use more fields and finish the games sooner, and Bayer responded that this would incur additional costs for umpires and grooming of the playing fields, which would raise the costs of the tournament. Brown inquired if it would be possible to leave the lights on for a half hour after the last game ended so patrons would not have to leave the fields in the dark, and Bayer responded that was their intent in requesting the variance. Hilgeman commented that the lights would go out at 10:30 p.m. regardless of what time the game ended. Lambert commented that if the games end at 10:00 p.m. they will not shut the lights off immediately, but will allow the people to reach their cars before the lights are turned off. Fox suggested that perhaps it would be possible to turn off all the lights but one pole, to leave sufficient illumination until people have left the park. Kracum noted that this was during a time when school was not in session and he appreciated the concerns of the neighborhoods. Potter commented that the residents had concerns regarding traffic and parking and how this was going to be handled. Lambert commented that County Road 4 could be under construction at that time, but that would have to be dealt with if that occurred. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Koenig seconded, to recommend that the Council authorize extending the time lights could be turned off to 10:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. B. Petition from Lecy Construction to Move Scenic Easement Line on Lot 6. Block 1. Bluffs West 11th Mark Lecy, representing Lecy Construction reviewed their proposal and illustrated the proposed intrusion for the house into the drainage and conservation easement, and outlined the vacation of the easement they have requested. This area will allow the homeowner adequate area to move around the point intrusion into the easement, and will allow room for a yard area as well. -J- EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 4 Fox reviewed the staff report and noted staff recommended the easement be amended to allow for the construction of the proposed home. There were some issues the Commission needed to consider; one, the footprint of the house was customized to fit onto the lot in the least intrusive manner possible and preserve as many of the existing trees as possible. He noted that the majority of the understory trees would remain untouched. There was also the possibility of sliding the house sideways to bring it closer to the lot line, but that would require a variance from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Hilgeman inquired why the triangular-shaped piece of the easement located at the bottom of the lot was included in the vacation. Lecy responded that this would be used as yard space by the homeowner, since it was a flat, grassy area which would provide some activity area, and there was no mowing allowed within a conservation easement. Hilgeman inquired why the house size was not reduced to fit within the lot area and Lecy responded that it would not be approved because it did not fall into the dollar range stipulated by the restrictive covenants on the property. Most customers want spread-out ramblers with this type of view, and the proposed house was on the smaller side, and he believed was as small as they could go and still be approved by the homeowners association. Koenig inquired if there would be fill placed on the property and Lecy responded negatively, noting that extra courses of block will need to be added to place the footings below the frost level. He commented they will do everything possible to avoid encroaching into the drip line area of the oak trees. Brown inquired what the building area requirements were in the restrictive covenants for the lot, and Lecy responded that there were no square footage requirements as such. In his opinion, a smaller home would not be valued in the same range as other homes in the area. He noted that if the house was turned around on the lot it would preclude the view they are trying to save. Koenig commented she realized this was a better plan than the others, but the was concerned about the back yard syndrome, which seemed to be occurring more frequently. She appreciated that people were entitled to develop their land as they wished, but at the same time, she believed that a purchaser for the property was aware of its limitations, and should enter into the agreement with those limits in mind. If not, there would be another buyer. Hilgeman was concerned about setting a precedent if they were to approve the vacation .as proposed, and believed that the triangular part of the easement should be excluded and the lot line drawn in a straight line to the end instead of creating a lot which was even more confusing in shape. She agreed that property owners needed area to get around the house itself. Koenig agreed with Hilgeman. -if- EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 5 Lecy said staff had recommended that the property line be staked to avoid encroachment further than that proposed. Hilgeman responded that if they have to impact the easement it should be as little as possible, and she did not support the inclusion of the triangular portion that was proposed. Brown, concurred, and commented that he also felt it should be excluded. Lecy noted that the buyers had asked for more land and he had convinced them to move the easement back to where it was shown on the plan. MOTION: Koenig moved, seconded by Hilgeman, to approve the request for a modified easement vacation with the stipulation that the lot line be extended in a straight line from the house until it meets the adjacent property line, eliminating the triangular portion at the southeast corner of the easement, and subject to the stipulations contained in the November 2, 1995 staff memorandum. Motion carried unanimously. C. Hennepin Parks Request to Remove Deer at Bryant Lake Park Fox reviewed the staff report and stated staff recommended approval of the proposal. He noted that Lawrence Gillette from Hennepin County was not present. Hilgeman asked if the City was giving permission for the deer population to be reduced or if there would actually be a reduction done. Fox responded that there was a need to reduce deer in the Bryant Regional area but Hennepin County would be required to show need to reduce the deer population in the Anderson Lakes area. He noted that approximately 20-24 deer would be removed from this area of the City and 10 deer would come out of the Bryant Regional Park area. Bremer commented that there were many winter activities that went on in Bryant Regional Park and he was concerned about the safety of park visitors when deer reduction was occurring. Fox responded that the area would be posted and lanes of fire which dead-ended would be used, and firing would only be into hills to avoid the problem of stray gunfire. Koenig inquired if Hennepin County would only be removing anterless deer, and Fox responded that was their intent, whenever possible. Koenig inquired when this would occur and Fox responded that it would take place between mid- November through March 1, 1996. Jacobson inquired if an Eden Prairie Police Officer would be present when the sharpshooting was going on, and Fox responded that Hennepin County Parks would use their own rangers on the site. The person doing the shooting would be an employee of the Hennepin County Park Service. Jacobson inquired if the Police Department would be notified when the sharpshooting was occurring and Fox responded affirmatively. -5 ., EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Petition from Lecy Construction to Vacate a Recreation and Facilities Portion of a Scenic and Conservation Easement on Lot 6, Block 1 of Stuart A. FOXtttF' Bluffs West 11 th Addition Attached is a letter from Lecy Construction to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission requesting a portion of a scenic and conservation easement be vacated to accommodate the construction of new home. The proposed two story home when using the setbacks from the road and side yard impacts approximately 10 feet of the scenic and conservation easement on this lot. (see map #2) The City when reviewing Bluffs West 9th Addition in 1990 looked at this entire area along Wild Heron Point and suggested a number of scenic conservation easements be used to preserve conservancy line indicated in the Purgatory Creek Study. The conservancy line indicated in the Purgatory Creek Study placed a line of conservation at the 800-foot contour in this area of the City. The developer in bringing forth this project was willing to work toward conserving some of the steep slopes, some of the woodland vegetation. They also dedicated several outlots to the City that contained Purgatory Creek and to accommodate cross trail access to other developments. The size house indicated on the original Bluffs West 9th Addition plan is very similar in size to the one that is being proposed by Lecy Construction. The only change is the angular nature of the garage entrance. PROPOSED CHANGE IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT: Staff met with Mark Lecy on the site, as well as surveyors for Hedlund Engineering in October. At that time, Mr. Lecy explained that there were covenants on these lots that made it imperative that he build a size and value home very similar to the houses already built up and down Wild Heron Point. This is the only vacant lot remaining on this subdivision. In previous evaluations of the site, it was suggested that a house of a more linear nature be placed on the lot; however, this would mean that several oak trees and a grouping of aspen at the rear of the lot would be taken down to accommodate such a building style. The proposed house corners were staked in the field. The staff in looking at them concurs that the proposed house would only impact a small part of the existing scenic conservation area. A summary of the lot as calculated by Hedlund Engineering is as follows: • Lot square footage 42,646 square feet. • Existing conservation easement area 30,080 square feet (71 % of lot area). • Area proposed to be vacated 2, 700 square feet. • Proposed revised scenic conservation area 27,380 square feet, which equals 64 % of the entire lot area. 1 -&- The staff also noticed that provisions have been made to allow for rear yard drainage to be directed toward a catch basin on the corner of Lot 5 and 6, thereby reducing or totally eliminating the amount of water that would be directed toward the steep slopes on this lot. Over the last three years staff has been called to this lot several times by potential builders to evaluate whether or not a house style would fit and whether or not they would need to petition to have the scenic and conservation easement changed. Of all the house plans reviewed by the staff, this is the least intrusive in terms of impacting the scenic and conservation line. In discussing the situation with Mr. Leey, we also discussed how much rear yard area would be necessary to keep the steep slope intact without having the property owner need it for a backyard play area. That is the reason a larger area than just 10 or 15 feet is being proposed to vacated. The rear corner of the house would match existing grades and use an area that is relatively free of major vegetation. The proposed change in the easement does leave the large oak trees in the scenic and conservation easement and the majority of the understory trees and brush untouched. RECOMMENDATION: The staff would recommend that the scenic and conservation easement for this lot be amended as proposed by Lecy Construction. In addition, staff would recommend that the builder post permanently the new scenic and conservation line, so that this does not become a problem in future years. The preference would be to use either metal stakes with the writing on a metal plaque or to use carsonite posts with a decal delineating the scenic and conservation easement line. In addition, the developer would have to pay all cost for having a public hearing to vacate this scenic and conservation easement area and the fees associated with redrawing the deeds and having them flIed at Hennepin County. SAF:mdd Lecy/Stuart 2 -1- "'rECY-CONSTRUCTION DESIGNERS & BUILDERS ----------. L 10340 Viking Drive, Suite 105, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Office: (612) 944-9499 Fax: (612) 942-1068 October 19, 1995 To: Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. Lecy Construction, Inc. proposes a two-story custom home on Lot 6 Block 1 Bluffs West 11th Addition. We are proposing an amendment of part of Scenic and Conservation Easement. See attached survey. The proposed home encroaches approximately 3-4 feet with an additional 10 feet for landscaping and yard purposes. The home is consistent in size with the other homes in the neighborhood. With a two-story design that maximizes square footage by stacking levels vrs. a spread out rambler design. A home of this size is required to meet neighborhood covenants and consistency. There will be no significant tree removal required to place this home. Three mature Oak trees in the rear yard not in the conservation area will remain vrs. a different design that would take more space in this area. Lot 6 is 42,646 square feet, approximately one acre. Approximately 31,500 square feet is in the existing Scenic and Conservation Drainage and Utility Easement, plus 11,146 square feet of the buildable area, plus standard 10 foot Drainage and Utility Easements. The proposed amended area would consist of approximately 2,700 square feet, or 6.4% of the lot surface. Special consideration has been taken by city planners and the developer for slope protection and run-off via grading and a catch basin system in rear. Lecy Construction, Inc. can assure the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission that slope protection, proper water run-off plan with erosion control, gutters, drainage to catch basin, and virtually no grading in the amended part of Scenic and Conservation Easement. Footings would extend the necessary distance into the ground so no additional backfill would be required in the southwest corner area. The patio comes out in the middle area of the basement and would require no retainage or fill work. This is, however, not in the conservation area. ~ Lecy Construction, Inc. EXHIBIT A CONSERVATION EASEMENT MODIFICATION That part of the following described property: Lot 6, Block 1, BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof. Which lies southwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 6; thence on a bearing of West 28.67 feet; thence North 5 degrees 5 minutes 19 seconds West 54.71 feet; thence North 32 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds West 139.98 feet; thence North 54 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds West 34.49 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet westerly from the northeast corner of said Lot 6, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating. Bearings are oriented to the plat of BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION. EXHIBIT A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED That part of the following described property: Lot 6, Block 1, BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the record plat thereof. Which lies southwesterly of the following described line, hereinafter referred to as Line A: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 6; thence North 25 degrees 19 minutes 00 seconds West 156.10 feet; thence northwesterly 87.33 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Lot 6 distant 173.81 feet westerly from the northeast corner of said Lot 6, as measured along said northerly line, and there terminating. And lies northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 6 distant 68.66 feet northeasterly of the most southerly corner of said Lot 6; thence on a bearing of West 28.67 feet; thence North 5 degrees 5 minutes 19 seconds West 54.71 feet; thence North 32 degrees 55 minutes 47 seconds West 139.98 feet to the point of intersection of the above described Line A and the south line of the North 10.00 feet of said Lot 6, and there terminating. Except the Southeasterly 10 feet of said Lot 6. Bearings are oriented to the plat of BLUFFS WEST 11TH ADDITION. _/0 - Bluff1s West 11 th Addition ,\ r \-r ',\ ~ \.. \ I I _~ , r,'" \ "r,r' \ \ \ \-,\~ t" \.1 \.1 \ I I ----- I /".,/"" --r' \ ,. \ ' .. ,-C" ,/ \' \.1 \ \ ~ \ '-..... / _ ~ / tEl'I)I)' 43' . / ~" " " .. v',,,,, == '89'lO' ~ ~~' " /' ~ I .n { 1it .~ \ / ,/" \ .-~ r~'" /' '" l~" ./ .' 0 ,~ ~ ./ ," \~ !jf~ /' (" ... \) r-(' ... ,-.. r. I I \ \-, -. C\.~\-I\ -.. (~ , .... ~i I,' ~ -. \ ~~\.--.. 2 r------ I -, I .. " \ , ("" \ \ . I I" 1 \..1 ~ r'" \.. gl I U'I gl I:;; :.1 I:: ~I I ---00--' _-\..\31)., 45' h.\g' 5\ \ \ ~ \ \~ ~ \ \0. ~\ \~~\ \-0,. <P \ \..- 1 - l,f!' ./ "", ••. -. ~:J/',. ------/ ./ <' \., -:-------- , r' .: lIt .... \' ~I r-:: \ .... \ '\ C \.-- north l' ~ / -( .,. (: \ I (, ~I \~ \.-.. ~ 5 48. 00 r' r' ':- -\ \ \ \" , -..1 \,1 \ (/) W I~~ 0- I .. !: c< _CI: -Q. .. c 3:W \ -;;; ffi I I / 1 / \ \ I \ \ ~0;23~ '-_ ~·l6_ J I / L _ 26;25_ / ... ,,,,,-r I~\r_ -. \ ~~\.--" -NB9' 00' ~O' W 34- -, \ -, ~\ (\ / I ~ III U ....L EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO.$, £ DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request from Suburban Hennepin Regional Recreation and F~ Park District to Sharpshoot Deer at Bryant Regional Park Stuart A. Fox Enclosed is a letter from Laurence Gillette, Wildlife Manager for Hennepin Parks. In past years, Mr. Gillette has inquired as to whether or not the park staff would be permitted to do deer reduction in Anderson Lakes Park. Prior to this year, the staff s recommendation was to hold off on any reduction of deer within their parks until the City finalized the recommendations on a citywide deer study. In 1993, the recommendations were made by the committee to the City Council to undertake a three-year reduction of deer in the City. During 1994-95 the City utilized Bryant Lake Regional Park as one of the sites where deer reduction took place. The petition from Hennepin Parks indicates that they are willing to work within the quotas that the City would have for this area of the City. The reduction would be at no cost to the City. In reviewing this petition the staff has looked at the overall plan and would like to point out the pros and cons of Hennepin Parks doing this deer reduction in conjunction with the citywide program. The pros to granting Hennepin Parks the ability to reduce deer in Bryant Lake Regional Park are as follows: • The reduction would be done at Hennepin Parks cost and reduce the City cost. • Hennepin Parks staff and their patrol officers will have direct contact with the sharpshooter and park users reducing the confusion as to why the City of Eden Prairie is utilizing county park property. • Hennepin Parks staff can better time their reduction program in conjunction with any activities that they wish to have at the park during the 1995-96 winter season. • This is consistent with their deer reduction programs in other municipalities where they have regional parks. The con side of having Hennepin Regional Parks do the reduction at Bryant Lake are as follows: • City residents may think that the deer removed at Bryant Regional Park are above and beyond those in the City's 1995-96 reduction program. This could lead to some confusion about how many deer are being reduced. • The City utilizes a police officer on site during the sharpshooting process and, therefore, any calls that come in to the Eden Prairie Public Safety Department received a prompt response as to what was going on and who was present on the site. 1 RECOMMENDATION: The staff has reviewed this proposal and spoken with Mr. Gillette regarding the number of animals that would be removed in this deer management area of the City. The total number of deer recommended for removal in northeasterly quadrant of the City would be somewhere between 20 and 24. The staff would recommend that Hennepin Parks be allowed to remove ten deer with an emphasis that antlerless deer would be the fIrst preference for the reduction program. In addition, the petition included the request related to Anderson Lakes Regional Park and the staff would recommend this issue not be addressed at this time based on the 1995 aerial counts for that area of the City. If the January 1996 aerial count does show a dramatic increase in the number of deer in this park, the staff would recommend that Mr. Gillette bring back a written request at that time. SAF:mdd deerreduct/Stuart 2 -, • HENNEPIN, SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT PARKS ~1iJ~?Jty Yr!ir~! ,October 10, 1995 ,Stu Fox 12615 County Road 9 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441-1248 Telephone (612)559-9000 TOO (612) 559-6719 FAX 559-3287 , City of Eden Prairie 7845 Mitchell-Road , Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Stu: , / .: ;' I ' Last -year Hennepin Parks -allowed Eden Prairie' to use Bryant Lake Regional Park as a', site to remove deer by sharpshooter. The park was closed to the public at the time for, renovation, and we had suspended our deer'removal program at Hyland for a year, so we had no one 'hired to shoot deer for us. ,/ V ',-,! ' \ .I , ( , --!,' \- This year is different. We plan to:resume deer removal at Hyland. I have hired Tony Vruwink to work along with our Rangers as a sharpshooter. Bryant Lake Regional Park will be open to the public this winter for a variety of activities. '/ " J -i ' Since we are prepared to shoot deer this year, we request that Hennepin Parks' staff be allowed to do the shooting at Bryant Lake Regional Park if you deem it necessary to remove deer from this section of Eden Prooe. We will abide by whatever quotas and -guidelines you set. We would like Eden Prairie to continue to inform your citizens of the program as you have done in the past. ( We may choose to do additional press releases to reach potential park Users outside the city. . , / . '/ ) . He~epin Parks may want to' remove de~r from its property surrounding Anderson Lakes, as well. ' Therefore, I request permission to shoot deer in this region if, the first aerial survey of the' winter' shows it is warranted. I 1 --/ " Thanks for your help in this matter. 'Let me know'if there is any other way we can help you with your -deer removal program. (. Sincerely, ~ , ./':" " . " , Laurence N. Gillette Wildlife Manager c Tom McDowell '/ / ' / v I ' / ( I ' , , •~--------~--~----~ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS David J. Dombrowski, Linda Marquardt, Jim Carey Marilynn Corcoran Rosemary Franzese Brigitte Kay Reuther Paul T ,,' Chair ---Vice·Chair Eden Prairie Dayton St. Anthony Plymouth Hop" St Louis Park Maple Grove An Equal Opportunity Employer Douglas F. Bryant, Superintendent and Secretary to the Board RECYCLED PAPER -Conserving our Reaourcaa Contains 50% total rocycted filer, 10% P08I-oonsumer _ EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 5 Lecy said staff had recommended that the property line be staked to avoid encroachment further than that proposed. Hilgeman responded that if they have to impact the easement it should be as little as possible, and she did not support the inclusion of the triangular portion that was proposed. Brown, concurred, and commented that he also felt it should be excluded. Lecy noted that the buyers had asked for more land and he had convinced them to move the easement back to where it was shown on the plan. MOTION: Koenig moved, seconded by Hilgeman, to approve the request for a modified easement vacation with the stipulation that the lot line be extended in a straight line from the house until it meets the adjacent property line, eliminating the triangular portion at the southeast corner of the easement, and subject to the stipulations contained in the November 2, 1995 staff memorandum. Motion carried unanimously. C. Hennepin Parks Request to Remove Deer at Bryant Lake Park Fox reviewed the staff report and stated staff recommended approval of the proposal. He noted that Lawrence Gillette from Hennepin County was not present. Hilgeman asked if the City was giving permission for the deer population to be reduced or if there would actually be a reduction done. Fox responded that there was a need to reduce deer in the Bryant Regional area but Hennepin County would be required to show need to reduce the deer population in the Anderson Lakes area. He noted that approximately 20-24 deer would be removed from this area of the City and 10 deer would come out of the Bryant Regional Park area. Bremer commented that there were many winter activities that went on in Bryant Regional Park and he was concerned about the safety of park visitors when deer reduction was occurring. Fox responded that the area would be posted and lanes of fire which dead-ended would be used, and firing would only be into hills to avoid the problem of stray gunfire. Koenig inquired if Hennepin County would only be removing anterless deer, and Fox responded that was their intent, whenever possible. Koenig inquired when this would occur and Fox responded that it would take place between mid- November through March 1, 1996. Jacobson inquired if an Eden Prairie Police Officer would be present when the sharpshooting was going on, and Fox responded that Hennepin County Parks would use their own rangers on the site. The person doing the shooting would be an employee of the Hennepin County Park Service. Jacobson inquired if the Police Department would be notified when the sharpshooting was occurring and Fox responded affirmatively. EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 6 MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Kracum seconded, to recommend approval of the request of Hennepin County to remove 10 deer from Bryant Regional Park, with the stipulation that the Eden Prairie Police Department be notified when sharpshooting would occur. Motion carried unanimously. D. Request for Pool Use from Foxjet Swim Club Lambert reviewed the request of the Foxjet Swim Club to rent the Community Center Pool on Friday, January 19, 1996 from 4:30 to 9:30 p.m. for the purpose of holding a swim meet. This will impact the open swim hours for that day, but the revenues from the swim meet exceed that projected from the open swim. Signs would be posted at the Community Center to notify the public of the cancellation or reduction of public use hours, and the monthly pool hours calendar will reflect the change in hours. Hilgeman commented she believed this was a reasonable request, but she was concerned about inconveniencing the public. Signs are not always seen by the public, and there are always people who don't know about these events who complain later. She inquired if there was some way that people who were inconvenienced could be recompensed. Laurie Helling responded that when they don't get signs up in time or notices published in the paper, they do give people free passes, etc. as compensation. However, this swim meet is far enough in advance so that they will be able to post notices and publish it in the paper. Brown inquired how many times they close the pool for swim meets, etc. and Helling responded that three to five times a year. She noted that open swim attendance varies from season to season, and there was no adequate way to predict how many swimmers would be impacted. Brown inquired if there was some other time to hold the swim meet and Lambert responded that most of the kids at the swim meet would be from Eden Prairie anyway, as it was a local swim club event. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Koenig, to recommend approval of rental of the Community Center Pool for the Foxjets to conduct .a swjm meet on January 19, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. v. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center by Hennepin County Paul Miller, representing Williams Gill & Associates, reviewed the proposal and noted that it would be a championship quality golf course, but was designed as an executive golf course. There will be nine holes, with the first seven holes EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. I \/, ~ DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Recommendation for Amendment to the 1995 Recreation and Facilities Fee Resolution Robert A. Lambert Pt- Attached to this memorandum is a memorandum from Bob Lanzi, Recreation Supervisor, recommending revisions to the park shelter reservation fees beginning December 1, 1995. This memorandum provides the rationale for the revision to the fees and was reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their November 6, 1995 meeting. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended unanimously to adopt the proposed changes in fees for this winter season. BL:mdd Attachment: FeeRes 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1995 FEE RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARK SHELTER RESERVATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie establishes fees, charges and rates on an annual basis, and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted park facility fees for reservations of certain park shelters, and WHEREAS, those fees are based on use of facilities for picnics and other gatherings during the warm weather months, and WHEREAS, reservations of these facilities during the winter months are generally limited to two to three hours by the school district or public service groups. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie establishes a winter reservation fee rate for the Staring Lake Park building and the Homeward Hills Park building as follows: FACILITY Staring Lake Park Building Homeward Hills Park Building FEE $20/hour, minimum 2 hours $10/hour, minimum 2 hours DEPOSIT $50.00 $50.00 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21 st day of November 1995. Jean Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SEAL ._,;) - MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: Bob Lanzi, Recreation Supervisor ~~ DATE: October 31, 1995 SUBJECT: Fees for Shelter Reservations During Winter Months REC01\1MENDA TION: Staff recommends the following proposed fees for park shelter reservations during the winter months effective winter season 1995-96. Staring Lake Park Building $80 flat fee (spring-fall) SIS/hour -minimum 2 hours (winter) S7.S0 for school groups Homeward Hills Building $25 -1st hour + $10lhour thereafter (spring-fall) RATIONALE: SIS/hour -minimum 2 hours (winter) S7.S0 for school groups Staring Lake Park Building No change at this time (spring-fall) S20/hour - 2 hours minimum (winter) Supervision required No change at this time (spring-fall) Sl0/hour - 2 hours minimum (winter) Supervision not required #1 • During the winter season reservations average 2-3 hours, whereas spring-fall reservations typically average 4-8 hours. #2 • During the winter season the user groups are typically school groups, Scout groups, church youth groups, etc., whereas spring-fall the user groups are usually corporate events or family gatherings. #3 • The proposed fee of $20/hour with a two hour minimum will cover the direct costs to open/close the facility, staff supervision, utilization of inner tubes, and fIreplace. Homeward Hills Park Building #1 • During the winter season reservations average 2-3 hours, whereas spring-fall reservations typically average 4-8 hours. -3- #2 • During the winter season the user groups are typically school groups, Scout groups, church youth groups, etc., whereas spring-fall the user groups are usually corporate events or family gatherings. #3 • The proposed fee of $10/hour with a two hour minimum will cover the direct costs to open/close the upper level of the building for private use (unsupervised). #4 • Provide Eden Prairie Hockey Association and other interested groups with a private on site area for team functions, etc. BACKGROUND: Staff felt that it was necessary to reassess our winter rates for park shelters to ensure that direct costs were covered and that rates were comparable in value for facilities and services rendered. BL:mdd cc: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services Lyndell Frey, Recreation Supervisor Shelter. fee/Laozi EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 10 a visual inspection of the site prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. He suggested they plan this trip for November 18, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. He was concerned about the extreme erosion on the site and when the property to the north is developed, it will have a direct impact on this property to the south. Discussion ensued regarding the debris which was deposited on the property and cleanup measures which have taken place. Lambert stated that the drainage from the property to the north will have to be controlled. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Koenig seconded, that a field trip be scheduled on November 18, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. to view the property. Motion carried unanimously. C. Revised Entry to Purgatory Creek Recreation Area George Watson reviewed the changes proposed to the entrance to Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and described the proposed amenities which would be included in this project. Formal gardens and a pavilion will be an eye-catching addition to the City. There will be only one restaurant included in the plan instead of the two originally proposed. Five acres would be sold to accommodate a restaurant and to generate revenue. Hilgeman inquired about action the Commission was requested to take and Lambert responded that the Commission should make a recommendation to the City Council. Watson noted that it was estimated it would be approximately two years before the site would be ready to sell to a developer for the restaurant. MOTION: Koenig moved, Hilgeman seconded, to recommend approval of the revised entry to Purgatory Creek Recreation Area per the November 1, 1995 letter from Brauer & Associates, Ltd. and the October 30, 1995 Staff Report. Motion carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Fees for Shelter Reservation During Winter Months Bob Lanzi reviewed the proposed fee changes for shelter use. Brown inquired if there were Senior Discount Rates implemented for the Starling Lake shelter, and Lanzi responded negatively. Lambert commented that there have never been Senior rates available, nor will there be. MOTION: Koenig moved, Kracum seconded, to recommend approval of the shelter fees as set forth in the memorandum dated October 31, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. -s-- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Approve Bid to Demolish the Palm Inspections Dept. House at 8510 Franlo Road and Assess Cost Recommendation: Authorization to demolish buildings at 8510 Franlo Road as hazardous buildings, and assess cost to property owners. This has been agreed to between property owners and mortage company. DATE: Nov. 21, 1995 ITEM NO. IV.G. AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS BUXLDINGS AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of this day of ________ ~~--, 1995, by and between the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (Deity") and Zachman Development Corporation ("zachman ll ). WHEREAS, Zachman is the owner of property situated at 8510 Franlo Road, Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 168, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, lying East of a line drawn from a point in the South line of said Tract B, distant 322 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof, to a point in the Westerly extension of the South line of Tract A in said Registered Land Survey, distant 89 feet Westerly of the Southwest corner of said Tract A, and lying Southerly of the above mentioned extension of the South line of said Tract A, except that part thereof lying Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 168 thence Southerly along the Easterly line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 168 a distance of 302.00 feet to point of beginning; thence Westerly parallel to the South line of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 168, a distance of 322.00 feet and there terminating the (" Property ., ), and WHEREAS, a house and a garage are situated on the Property, and WHKRaAS, the house is uninhabitable and is unoccupied and has continued to deteriorate since it was vacated, has at times been open to trespass. and on at least one occasion a small fire was started in it. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows; 1. The house and garage located on the Property constitute hazardous buildings or hazardous conditions because of physical damage, inadequate maintenance, dilapidation or c00-d 961-1 6cB-~ [lL06cBc19 '. abandonment. and constitute a further fire hazard or hazard to public safety or health. 2. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.151. Zachman authorizes the City to remove and raze the remains of the hazardous buildings from, and the correction of the hazardous conditions upon, the Property. 3. The costs of said removal and correction in the amount of Nine Thousand One Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($9,100.00) shall be chorged against the Property as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.21, provided, however, that the cost so assessed may be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. 4. Zachman waives all rights he hos or may have under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, including, but not limited to, rights to notice of hearing and hearing pursuont to sections 429.031 and 429.061. to any appeol pursuant to Section 429.036, and to appeal of assessments pursuant to Section 429.081. [00-d 96l-1 6c8-~ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRX2 By Carl J. Jullie Its city Manager By Jean M. Harris Its Mayor By Its __ ~~~ ______________ ------ £lL.06c8cl9 ACMOWLBDGBMBN'l'S STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ____ day of __ ~ __________ I 1995 by carl J. Jullie and Jean M. Harris, the City Manager and Mayor, respectively, of the City of Eden Prairie. Notary Public STATE OF M~J . ) SS. COUNTY OF .) '1\ !{hfs instrument was ~nowleQged:be!pre me on the Ue~ , 1995 by CM(\n\~ A. ~(.H,.~~ I the --4~-":::;"~=---= of Zachman Development Corporat c:\wpSl\rap\ev\gravelle\sgreement v00-d 961-~ 6c8-~ ~'-\. MARGARET ZACHMAN ff~ -~~: NO-;"ARV pUBUG-MINNESOT,o. ~ MV COMMISSION EXPIRE'S 1-31-2000 £lL.06c8c19 -. CONSENT OF STAN KOCH &: SONS TRUCKING, INC .. MORTGAGEE THIS CONSENT 1S given in connection with that certain agreement entitled UAgreement For Removal of Hazardous Buildings cmd Special ASsessment II to which this Consent is attached (the "Agreement") . WHEREAS, the undersigned represents that it is the holder of the Mortgagee's interest in that certain mortgage, Document Number 26489£2 , dated OctobeI:' 19, 1995 , filed November 1, 1995 , in the office of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, in favor of the undersigned to secure One Hundred Eighty-two Thousand Nine Hundred and no/IOO Dollars ($lB2,900.00). NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby consents and agrees to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, including but not limited to the removal or razing of the remains of the hazardous buildings from, and the correction of the hazardous conditions upon, the Property, and the assessment of the costs thereof against the Property. and waives those rights it may have under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, including, but not limited to, rights to notice of hearing and hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.031 and 429.061, to any appeal pursuant to Section 429.036 and to appeal of assessments pursuant to Section 429.081. The undersigned hereby subordinates its interests in the Property to the lien of the assessment to be made against the Property. HORTGAGBB STAR ~OCB & SONS TRUC~X.G. XNC. ---.-By Its ACDIOIILBDGBMBNT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ,\ <) COUNTY OF ~ P"'-) 5S. instrument wa. of ~~~~~~~' 1995 by ~~~~~~~ ______ ~, the ~~~~~~~ __ of ~ c.\wpS1\rap\ep\gravelle\conaent -rVG3 ~00-d 95l-1 5cB-~ ~~) MARGARET ZACHMAN "'=-r1."~~Q MIINOTARY PUBlIC_'IIIINNESOC. A . ~~ . COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-31-~ [lL.05cBcl9 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21/95 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. IV. H DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Approve Bids for Replacing Dasherboard Recreation and Facilities System in Rink #1 at Eden Prairie Community Center Robert A. Lambert~ RECOMMENDATION: The City received three bids for replacing the dasherboard system in rink number 1 at the Eden Prairie Community Center. The bids are as follows: Becker Arena Products, Inc. R & R Specialties Rink Systems $105,682 $98,999 $117,500 $15,000 $8,000 $90,682 $5,000 $3,200 $93,999 $4,000 $8,000 $113,500 City staff recommend the City Council authorize entering into a contract with Becker Arena Products, Inc. with a base bid of $105,682 and a deduct of $15,000 for the trade-in of the existing dasherboard system for a net bid of $90,682. City staff will remove the existing boards. FUNDING SOURCE: Staff recommends borrowing funds from the cash park fee fund and paying off the fund with revenues generated from selling ice time at $2.50/hour higher than our normal rate over the next ten years, and . by using fees generated from profits normally assigned to the high school from their home hockey games over that same period of time. Furthermore, that any additional funds required to payoff the fund debt comes from revenues for the sale of ice at the Eden Prairie Community Center that would normally be deposited in the general fund to a maximum of $6,000/year. The School Board authorized foregoing the profit generated from home hockey games for the term of the debt of the dasherboard system earlier this year. This project would be completed during the month of May 1996. This project was originally bid in May of 1995 with only one company bidding the project with a net cost of $115,400. No other companies bid this project at that time due to a September 1 completion timeline. BL:mdd dasher/Bob2 1 ~~I. DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA , November 17, SECTION: • DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Consent Calendar IV. I. Background: These Industrial Development Revenue Bonds were issued in December 1993 in the amount of $1,000,000. The substitute letter of credit is a better credit enhancement than the one now in place. Requested Action: Approve the resolution subject to review and-approval of documents by the city attorney. ActionIDirection: 1995 Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. ____ _ RESOLUTION RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (SUPERVALU INC. PROJECT), SERIES 1993; AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT . OF DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City has previously issued its Industrial Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (SUPERVALU INC. Project), Series 1993 dated, as originally issued, as of December 30, 1993 (the Bonds), in the original principal amount of $1,000,000. The Bonds were issued on behalf of SUPERV ALU INC., a Delaware corporation (the Company) for the purpose of refunding certain bonds issued to financing the acquisition, construction and betterment of a facility in the City to be used by the Company as the Company's ex;,ecutive office building (the Facility). 1.02. The Bonds were issued under the terms of an Indenture of Trust, dated as of December I, 1993 (the Original Indenture), between the City and First Trust National Association, as trustee (the Trustee). The Company has agreed to make payments sufficient to pay the principal and purchase price of, premium, if any, and interest on, the Bonds under the terms of a Loan Agreement, dated as of December I, 1993 (the Original Loan Agreement), between the Company and the City. 1.03. The Company has requested that terms of the Original Indenture, the Original Loan Agreement and the Bonds be amended to allow the Company to provide a letter of credit to secure the payment of the Bonds. 1.04. The following documents relating to the amendment have been submitted to the City and are now, or shall be placed, on file in the office of the City Finance Director: (a) an Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust (the Indenture) to be entered into between the City and the Trustee; (b) an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (the Loan Agreement) to be entered into between the City and the Company; and (c) a Letter of Credit Reimbursement and Security Agreement (the Credit Agreement) to be entered into between the Company and Wachovia Bank of Georgia, National Association. Section 2. Approval of the Execution of Documents. 2.01. The forms of the Indenture, the Loan Agreement and the Credit Agreement referred to in Section 1.04 are hereby approved. The Indenture and the Loan Agreement, substantially in the form submitted but with such variations, insertions and additions as the City Attorney may hereafter approve, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the Mayor and the City Manager. Copies of all of the documents shall be delivered as provided therein. The Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed to execute such other documents and closing certificates as may be necessary or desirable to carry out the amendments contemplated by the Indenture and the Loan Agreement, upon review and approval thereof by the City Attorney. 2.02. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or City Manager, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed by such other officer of the City as, In the opinion of the City Attorney, is authorized to execute such documents. 2.03. The Mayor and the City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the amendments to the Original Loan Agreement and the Original Indenture, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. -2- Adopted on the 21st day of November, 1995. Mayor Attest: --,:--_________ _ Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was approved and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. -3- EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-21-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.A. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger GLEN LAKE GOLF AND PRACTICE CENTER Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 13.5 acres. Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request at their October 23, 1995 meeting according to the Staff Report dated October 20, 1995. The plans have been revised to incorporate a majority percentage of Oak and Ash trees for the deciduous plantings to blend with the existing Oak and Ash varieties that exist on the site. In addition, the outside storage bins have been removed from the proposal, rather than providing the necessary screening as recommended in the Staff Report. The Golf Course plans will be reviewed by the City of Minnetonka later this month. As a condition of site plan approval, we recommend that the proponent receive approval of the proposal from Minnetonka prior to the issuance of any grading permit or development of the property. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Site Plan Review 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated October 23, 1995 3. Staff Report dated October 20, 1995 V.A. - \ GLEN LAKE GOLF AND PRACTICE CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR GLEN LAKE GOLF AND PRACTICE CENTER BY HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, Hennepin County has applied for Site Plan approval of Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center on 13.5 acres for construction of a nine hole executive golf course located at County Road 62 and Indian Chief Road to be zoned within the Public Zoning District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its October 23, 1995, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its November 21, 1995, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center for the construction and development of a golf course, based on plans dated November 15, 1995, between Hennepin County, and the City of Eden Prairie with no grading, alteration, or development of the property taking place until the City of Minnetonka has reviewed and approved the golf course plans. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 21, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk V,A. -Z APPROVED MINUTES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION COMMISSION MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS: October 23, 1995 Kenneth E. Clinton, Randy Foote, Ismail, Katherine Kardell, Douglas Sandstad, Edward Schlampp, Mary Jane Wissner Michael D. Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Planner Barbara Anderson, City Recorder I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -ROLL CALL The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Katherine Kardell. Commissioner Sandstad arrived at the meeting at 7:15 p.m. n. APPROV AL OF AGENDA MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Wissner to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 6-0. m. APPROV AL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 9, 1995 MOTION: Schlampp moved, seconded by Wissner to approve the Minutes of the October 9, 1995 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Motion carried 5-0-1. Kardell noted she abstained as she was not present at the meeting. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. GLEN LAKE GOLF AND PRACTICE CENTER by Hennepin County. Request for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres. Location: Crosstown at Indian Chief Road. Paul Miller, representing Williams Gill & Associates, reviewed the proposal and noted that it would be a championship quality golf course, but was designed as an executive golf course. There will be nine holes, with the first seven holes located on the Minnetonka side of the site and the eighth and ninth holes located on the Eden Prairie portion of the property. There will be a practice range which will feature target ranges and fairways which will allow people to practice during inclement weather and receive feedback regarding how well they are doing. Players will pass underneath the roadway to reach the holes located on the south side of the property, and he believed these were V. A., -3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 23, 1995 Page 2 the most interesting holes topographically. There are many large oak trees on this portion of the property which will be preserved, and there is also a drainage pond on the site which will collect runoff from the parking lot area. He stated they have worked hard to achieve a plan which fits into the site and the natural features present on the property. Ismail asked what the term "executive golf course" meant and Miller responded that it was a shorter course than the championship course. The purpose in designing a shorter course was to create a golf course with all the features and amenities of the championship level course, but shorter in length to allow people of all levels to play on it and enjoy it. It was designed for those people who play for fun rather than those who play competitively. Ismail asked whether they had received approval from the City of Minnetonka or from Hennepin County, and Miller responded that those applications were in process, but they anticipated that they would be approved. Foote asked about irrigation for the property and Miller responded that they would use water from the pond on the site adjacent to hole #7, which would provide adequate water for the entire golf course. Kipp reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commission. He noted that the portion of the proposal which impacted Eden Prairie was the southern portion on which holes #8 and #9 would be constructed in addition to a maintenance building. A golf course is a permitted use in the Public Zoning District. Staff recommended approval of the site plan review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres based on plans dated October 11, 1995, the Staff Report dated October 20, 1995 and the stipulations included therein. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Wissner moved, seconded by Clinton, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hennepin County for Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres based on plans dated October 11, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 20, 1995. Motion carried 6-0-0. V.A,-Y STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Planner Michael D. Franzen, City Planner October 20, 1995 Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center Williams Gill & Associates Hennepin County County Road 62 and Indian Chief Road 1. Site Plan Review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres. V.A..-5 Staff Report Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center October 20, 1995 BACKGROUND In 1991, the State of Minnesota relinguished a lease with Hennepin County on the Oak Terrace/Glen Lake Sanitorium facility located near the intersection of County Road 4 and County Road 62 in Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. As a result, the Hennepin County Board created the Glen Lake Task Force to evaluate the development potential of this property. The task force considered housing, commercial, and a golf course as potential land uses. The task force recommended development of a public golf course. Hennepin County has agreed to construct this golf course on the 75 acre parcel that lies in both Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. The sanitoriumJacilities were demolished in 1993. Surrounding land uses to the golf course site are the County Home School located in Minnetonka, the BFI recycling facility in Eden Prairie to the east, Birch Island Lake located in Eden Prairie to the south and west, and County Road 4 and residential in Minnetonka to the west. The Eden Prairie portion of the property is guided as Hennepin County and Public Open Space. The property is zoned Public. SITE PLAN The proposal is to construct a nine hole executive golf course. Holes 8 and 9 and the golf course maintenance building are proposed on the Eden Prairie side of the property. A golf course is a permitted use in the Public Zoning District. The maintenance building and parking meet all setback requirements in this zoning district. The proposal also meets all Shoreland Code requirements. ACCESS The golf course parking lot is located in Minnetonka and will take access from the signalized intersection of County Road 62 and the frontage road. A left turn lane from east bound County Road 62 will allow safe turning movements into the parking lot. Access to the maintenance building will be from Indian Chief Road in Eden Prairie. Pedestrian access to holes 8 and 9 in Eden Prairie will be from an existing underground tunnel installed during the upgrading of County Road 62. A chain link perimeter fence will be constructed on the Eden Prairie side to control pedestrians crossing County Road 62. V.A.-b Staff Report Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center October 20, 1995 GRADING AND DRAINAGE A tree inventory of the property indicates that 350 caliper inches of significant trees will be removed. This represents a 23% tree loss. A tree replacement of 102 caliper inches is required. The drainage plan includes a NURP pond to collect parking lot runoff. No wetland or shore1and encroachment on the Eden Prairie side of the development is proposed. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water is available to the site by connection to existing services on the east side of Indian Chief Road. LANDSCAPING The landscaping plan slows a total of 145 caliper inches of plant material, meeting both the landscaping and tree replacement requirements. A mixture of Linden, Ash, Maple, and Oak deciduous trees and evergreens are proposed. Staff recommends that the landscaping plan be revised to increase the percentage of Oak and Ash trees to blend with similar significant trees on the property. The preservation of a large wooded knoll and proposed berming and planting screens parking from County Road 62 and Indian Chief Road. ARCHITECTURE The 3,500 sq. ft. maintenance building will be constructed with 85% face brick and 15% metal panel as exterior materials. City code requires the use of at least 75% face brick, glass, or stone as an exterior material in the Public Zoning District. The facility will also include an above ground concrete vaulted fuel tank and some storage bins for sand and earthen materials for golf course maintenance use. The fuel tank will be self screened by the concrete vault. However, staff recommends that the storage bin area be physically screened from County Road 62 with a 6 foot high, 2 inch thick board-on-board wood screening fence. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the site plan review within the Public Zoning District on 13.5 acres based on plans dated October 11, 1995, this report and the following: V.A. -7 Staff Report Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center October 20, 1995 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscaping plan to incorporate a majority percentage of Oak and Ash trees for the deciduous plantings to blend with the existing Oak and Ash varieties existing on site. B. Revise the landscape plan to include a 6 foot high. 2 inch thick board-on-board wood screening fence to screen the outside storage bins along the north parking area. 2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Receive approval for the golf course proposal from the City of Minnetonka. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. C. Stake the construction limits with snow fencing within the wooded areas. Said fencing shall be installed at least 48 hours prior to grading and field inspected by the City Forester. D. Install erosion control along the grading limits in accordance with City and Watershed District requirements. V. A. -g MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: November 1, 1995 SUBJECT: Supplement Staff Report to October 20, 1995 Staff Report for Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center BACKGROUND: This site is 13.5 acres of the nearly 75 acres proposed development for the golf course. The majority of the property is located in Minnetonka. However, part of the facilities; namely, two golf holes and the golf course maintenance building are located in the boundaries of the City of Eden Prairie. This proposal was the result of a task force that met to determine the outcome of the Hennepin County land on the Oak Terrace/Glen Lake Sanitorium facilities site controlled by Hennepin County. Hennepin County Parks has agreed to construct and operate this golf course. The Eden Prairie portion of the property is guided as public open space. ISSUES: Natural Resources/Tree Preservation This part of the total site has a mixture of woodlands and open space areas. The site formerly included a school building and the physical plant for heating of the Glen Lake Sanitorium and Oak Terrace Nursing Home. The area has a mixture of hardwood trees on it and the tree inventory indicates a total of 68 significant trees for a total of 1,513 diameter inches. Development of the two golf holes and maintenance shed would result in loss of eight trees with a total 350 diameter inches. The staff would like to note that the majority of the loss; namely, three of the trees are very large cottonwoods being 60, 80, and 120 inches in diameter. The remainder of trees lost to development are four ash trees with one 24-inch oak tree. Based on the Tree Preservation Ordinance, this results in a loss of 23 % of the significant trees on the site and requires 102 caliper inches of mitigation. The landscaping plan submitted by the proponent details the planting of 145 diameter inches of replacement trees, including American linden, sugar maple, ash, pin oak, and coniferous material such as Colorado spruce, Austrian and Scotch pine. The majority of the screening type landscaping is scheduled to take place around the perimeter of the maintenance facility and parking area to shield it from the adjacent golf holes number eight and nine. The plan uses a number of natural characteristics on the site; namely, brush areas and large tree masses to reduce the amount of grading and enhance the natural backdrop that will remain following creation of this golf course. Wetland Impact and Storm Water Treatment This plan utilizes a NURP pond to treat the water from the hard surface area around the maintenance garage prior to its discharge into Birch Island Lake. This pond has been reviewed by the City Engineering Department and does meet the size and runoff requirements to adequately treat this storm water. The wetlands of Birch Island Lake are delineated on the proposed plans and no grading will take place within the wetland delineation. The developer is required to follow all Purgatory Creek Watershed District regulations and submit detailed grading plan to the City Engineer prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks/Trails The staff is recommending that an eight foot wide bituminous trail be constructed along the westerly side of Indian Chief Road at the time of construction. This trail is on a proposed trail system map that will be completed at sometime in the future to carry pedestrian traffic down to Edenvale Boulevard along the westerly side of Indian Chief Road. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed at the October 23, 1995 Planning Commission meeting and was approved on a 7-0 vote. The staff would recommend that this project be approved by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission based on the October 20, 1995 Community Development Staff Report and the sidewalk trail issue included in this report. SAF:mdd Golf v. fl·l.2.. EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 6 MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Kracum seconded, to recommend approval of the request of Hennepin County to remove 10 deer from Bryant Regional Park, with the stipulation that the Eden Prairie Police Department be notified when sharpshooting would occur. Motion carried unanimously. D. Request for Pool Use from Foxjet Swim Club Lambert reviewed the request of the Foxjet Swim Club to rent the Community Center Pool on Friday, January 19, 1996 from 4:30 to 9:30 p.m. for the purpose of holding a swim meet. This will impact the open swim hours for that day, but the revenues from the swim meet exceed that projected from the open swim. Signs would be posted at the Community Center to notify the public of the cancellation or reduction of public use hours, and the monthly pool hours calendar will reflect the change in hours. Hilgeman commented she believed this was a reasonable request, but she was concerned about inconveniencing the public. Signs are not always seen by the public, and there are always people who don't know about these events who complain later. She inquired if there was some way that people who were inconvenienced could be recompensed. Laurie Helling responded that when they don't get signs up in time or notices published in the paper, they do give people free passes, etc. as compensation. However, this swim meet is far enough in advance so that they will be able to post notices and publish it in the paper. Brown inquired how many times they close the pool for swim meets, etc. and Helling responded that three to five times a year. She noted that open swim attendance varies from season to season, and there was no adequate way to predict how many swimmers would be impacted. Brown inquired if there was some other time to hold the swim meet and Lambert responded that most of the kids at the swim meet would be from Eden Prairie anyway, as it was a local swim club event. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Koenig, to recommend approval of rental of the Community Center Pool for the Foxjets to conduct a swim meet on January 19, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. v. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center by Hennepin County Paul Miller, representing Williams Gill & Associates, reviewed the proposal and noted that it would be a championship quality golf course, but was designed as an executive golf course. There will be nine holes, with the first seven holes EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 7 located on the Minnetonka side of the site and the eighth and ninth holes located on the Eden Prairie portion of the property. The course has been designed as a family-type community course, rather than for competitive golfers. The amenities include a two-story clubhouse, a parking lot, the practice range and a teaching area. Players will cross beneath County Road 62 at the bridge to reach the Eden Prairie portion of the course. The maintenance building will be located on the Eden Prairie property and will be heavily landscaped and well screened from view. Brown asked about the proximity of the golf course to the Hennepin County Home School. Miller illustrated the boundaries of the site in Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. Brown asked if the trees in that area would be affected and Miller responded that the large stand of oak trees would be preserved, and most of the trees on the site will remain untouched. Hanka inquired about the horse trails that the boys at the Home School use, and Miller responded they were all located on Home School property and not on the golf course site. Bremer inquired if the gold course was being developed by Hennepin County, and Miller responded affirmatively, but that it would be managed by the Hennepin County Park Service. Kracum commented he was excited by the proposal and was pleased to see a community and family oriented golf course come into the community. Fox reviewed the staff report and illustrated the locations of the oak and cottonwood trees which were proposed to be retained. He indicated that the total number of trees which would be lost was 8, with the loss of a total of 102 caliper inches of mitigation required. The proponent proposed to plant 145 caliper inches of replacement trees. There is no wetland impact on the Eden Prairie portion of the site, and a NURP pond is proposed to treat runoff from the hard surface areas. Staff recommended that an eight foot wide bituminous trail be constructed along the westerly side of Indian Chief Road at the time of construction. Staff recommended approval based on the October 20, 1995 Community development staff report and the sidewalk trail issue included in the November 1, 1995 staff report. Brown inquired if the entrance to the maintenance building would be from Indian Chief Road and Fox responded affirmatively. Hilgeman commented that it was an excellent plan in that it only impacted eight trees. Koenig inquired if replacement materials had been addressed, and Fox responded that it had not yet been formally incorporated but staff will be meeting with the proponents to incorporate this into the plan prior to City Council review. Bowman inquired if special consideration had been given to landmark trees on the property, as he assumed that a large cottonwood could be perceived as a EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 8 landmark tree. He inquired about the age of the cottonwood trees on the site and Fox responded that they would be about 80 years old and about at the end of their life expectancy. Miller stated that because the cottonwoods are so old, Hennepin County was more concerned about saving the oak trees, which would live for some time yet. Hilgeman commented that there will be a good deal of replacement planting done in areas such as around the maintenance shed, and she would not be opposed to the developer planting a few cottonwoods as they were indigenous to the site. MOTION: Brown moved, Hilgeman seconded, to recommend approval of the request subject to the stipulations in the October 20, 1995 Planning Commission staff report and the trail recommendation set forth in the November 1, 1995 Memorandum prepared by staff. Motion carried unanimously. Jacobson inquired when the gold course would be completed and Miller responded about July, 1997. B. Eden Hills Condominiums by Brenwood Development Corporation Arne Zachman, representing Brenwood Development Corporation, was present, but did not wish to address the Commission. Fox reviewed the staff report and discussed the proposed tree replacement, which staff believed was insufficient to meet City requirements. A meeting was scheduled with the developer to address this issue. Brown inquired if Medcom Boulevard would be extended to Franlo Road, and Fox responded that it was planned to continue through, although some fill may need to be added in the area to make this possible. Koenig inquired about the scenic easements and the area involved. Fox responded that it will be at the base of the retaining walls downhill, and there would be an easement to prevent erosion. Brown inquired about the parking on the site, and Zachman responded that there will be one underground parking stall for each unit, with extra stalls available for those residents with more than one vehicle. He commented that they have tried to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible, but there was going to be some tree loss no matter how the building was placed on the site. They endeavored to save the most significant trees on the site. Hilgeman asked about the tree replacement on the plans and Fox reviewed the landscape plan and noted that the numbers were not yet finalized, but it would give the Commission some idea of what was proposed. The plans will be revised to meet City Code requirements. V.R.~.<s EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-21-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.5. DEP ARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger EDEN HILLS CONDOMINIUMS Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 3.3 acres into I lot and road right-of-way; Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request at their October 23, 1995 meeting according to the Staff Report dated October 20, 1995. The plans have been revised providing for 351 caliper inches oflandscaping consisting of a majority use of Oak, Maple, and Basswood varieties native to the site. In addition, evergreen trees have been included to screen the drive aisle and entrance from the south, and a five foot sidewalk along the edge of the parking lot leading to the building entrance. The proposed Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential for 11 units per acre is a compatible and transitional density between Medium Density Residential projects to the south and west and commercial land use to the north. The proposal will generate less traffic than commercial land use, and will preserve a significant amount of the natural vegetation. In addition, the condominium project will provide an additional alternative type of housing in the community. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 2. Resolution for Compo Guide Plan 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated October 23, 1995 4. Staff Report dated October 20, 1995 5. Correspondence v'.S.-J EDEN HILLS CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDEN HILLS CONDOMINIUMS FOR BRENWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Eden Hills Condominiums for Brenwood Development Corporation dated November 14, 1995, consisting of 3.3 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 21st day of November, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk EDEN HILLS CONDOMINIUMS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Eden Hills Condominiums by Brenwood Development Corporation for construction of a 3 story, 36 unit condominium building on 3.3 acres, requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 3.3 acres from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential all located at Franlo Road, south of Prairie Center Drive. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 21st day of November, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk \/,B,-3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 23, 1995 Page 3 B. EDEN IllLLS CONDOMINIUMS by Brenwood Development Corporation. Request for Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM- 2.5 on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way. Location: Franlo Road, south of Prairie Center Drive. Peter Knaeble representing Brenwood Development Corporation introduced Arne Zachman of Brenwood Development, and John Harris of HKA Architects, who were also present. Knaeble reviewed the proposal and noted that they are requesting four approvals; a Guide Plan Change, a Zoning Change, a Site Plan Approval and a Preliminary Plat. They believed that the transition between their proposed project and the adjacent properties was a good one, and fit within the guidelines and met City Code requirements. He stated they propose to save extensive tracts of existing trees on the site and to place a conservation easement over a portion of them to preserve them indefinitely. He discussed the retaining walls which will be used to preserve site vegetation and trees on the south side of the property. He discussed the three items staff had requested them to provide prior to City Council review of their proposal, and noted that they will provide revised landscaping plans as requested. He stated that they will work with staff to develop plans to include the 5' sidewalk along the front edge of the parking lot, and they will submit samples of building materials for staff review. He noted that they had c9lored renderings of the building to show to the Planning Commission that evening which would illustrate how the buildings would appear when constructed. Sandstad commented that it appeared the sidewalk in the Medcom Boulevard area disappeared on the plans and Knaeble responded that their sidewalk will tie into the sidewalk when Medcom Boulevard is extended in that area. Sandstad asked about a decorative post or sign for the project and Knaeble responded that there will be a small sign. Sandstad inquired whether the parking would be adequate during holiday times, and Knaeble responded that at other similar facilities in Minnetonka and elsewhere with lower parking requirements the parking had been adequate. He noted that the City of Minnetonka requires 1.5 spaces per unit versus Eden Prairies' requirement of 2 spaces per unit. John Harris, HKA Architects, showed colored renderings of the building illustrating the appearance of the building and its appearance from different angles. He stated that all materials will be earth tones to blend in with the V.B. -y PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 23, 1995 Page 4 area and they have designed the pitch of the roof not to be intrusive into the surroundings. Wissner inquired why they proposed to use vinyl siding instead of wood and Arne Zachman responded that they were endeavoring to make the building as maintenance free as possible to reduce association fees for the residents. Harris noted that vinyl siding is only proposed to be used in the bay window areas. Wissner commented that she had noticed problems with vinyl siding in areas where long pieces were used, and Harris reiterated that they only proposed to use it in the bay window areas which would be short lengths. Schlampp commented he was concerned about the parking being inadequate for a 36 unit building with only 26 exterior spaces provided. Zachman stated that they are meeting code by prociding at least 2 spaces for every unit. There was one underground parking stall that went with each unit, and there were others that would be sold to residents. They were targeting the "empty nester" segment of the population with this development, and they usually do not have as many vehicles. Ismail inquired about the price range of the units and Zachman responded that the 2 bedroom units would probably be somewhere in the area of $123,500 and the most expensive end units would probably be in the $147,500 range. He noted that pricing had not yet been determined. Clinton commented that traffic onto Franlo Road in this area is heavy and it will be difficult to get out of the development. He inquired if the City has future plans to install a traffic light at the intersection of Franlo Road and Prairie Center Drive and Kipp responded affirmatively. Sandstad inquired if the building would contain recreational facilities such as a party room. Zachman responded that they plan to have a party room, an exercise room, a game room and there will be space available for other amenities which have not yet been decided upon. Foote inquired about the building in Minnetonka and whether that had been successful and Zachman responded that there is a good market for this type of homesite and most of the units have been sold. Foote inquired if there were other buildings of this type in Eden Prairie and Franzen responded that the last one he knew of was the Ironwood Condominium in the Preserve area. Most empty nesters live in townhouse or quad developments. \/,e,. -s- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 23, 1995 Page 5 Wissner noted that the brochure had an awning on it over the front of the building and she inquired if that would be constructed. Zachman responded that it would be and it will extend to the parking area in the front. Kipp reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into one lot and road right-of-way based on plans dated October 11, 1995, the Staff Report dated October 20, 1995 and the stipulations and recommendations contained therein. Wissner inquired how much acreage was undeveloped to the north of this site, and Kipp responded approximately 4 acres. Kardell inquired what the staff expectations were for the completion of Medcom Boulevard, and Kipp responded that it was a priority and they expected to proceed with completion as early as next year. He noted that it would be a standard 32' wide roadway. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. MOTION 1: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0-0. MOTION 2: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Brenwood Development Corporation for Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way based on plans dated October 11, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 20, 1995, and including a stipulation that the developer delineate the conservation easement area prior to City Council review. Motion carried 7-0-0. v.B.-6 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT! FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Planner Michael D. Franzen, City Planner October 20, 1995 Eden Hills Condominiums Brenwood Development Franlo Road, south of Prairie Center Drive 1. Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres. 2. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-2.5 on 3.3 acres. 3. Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into I lot and road right-of-way. V.B. -~ F~;'GSHIP ,\:>01-:-101 .. ?!.:~ t.lA~ ;..:~.; :;E:-!TC:i~ V.B.~ g LUNOS CENTER ADO E~EN i..AK· ELEM. EDEN HILLS CONDOl\-_HUMS Staff Report October 20, 1995 BACKGROUND This site is currently guided for Neighborhood Commercial land use. The property is zoned Rural. Surrounding land uses consist of a future Medcom Boulevard extension and commercial to the north, the Lund's grocery store and future high density residential to the east, and medium density to the south and west. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE There must be compelling reasons for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan. As part of this discussion, the Commission should consider the following questions: 1. Does the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan change the balance of land uses in the community? Changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan would remove 3.3 acres of commercial and add 36 units of multiple family. Since the number of multiple family units and commercial acreage is large in the community, the small amount of change will not affect the Guide Plan balance. 2. Will the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan be compatible with surrounding land uses? The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows surrounding land uses as Neighborhood Commercial to the north, high density residential to the east (17.4 units/acre), medium density residential to the south (3.0 units/acre), and medium density to the west (4.6 units/acres). The density of this project at 11.0 units per acre can be a transitional density. 3. Is there a traffic impact on the adjoining road system. The 36 unit multiple family project will generate 360 daily trips and 36 a.m. and 36 p.m. peak hour trips. Based on approximately two acres of developable area, a 17,400 sq. ft. commercial building could be built as guided Neighborhood Commercial. Commercial would generate 810 total daily trips and 85 a.m. and 85 p.m. trips. 4. How does the Comprehensive Guide Plan impact the sites natural features. If the property is developed according to Neighborhood Commercial standards, a 28,750 sq. ft. commercial building with 172 parking spaces would be possible. However, the steep slopes and oak trees on the property limits the development potential. A realistic amount of commercial development, based on 2 acres of buildable area, would be v.s. ~ 9 EDEN HILLS CONDOL _~"iIUMS Staff Report October 20, 1995 approximately 17,400 sq. ft. and 104 parking spaces. Tree loss would be approximately 40%. The site plan for the condominium project uses less than two acres of the site because there is an efficiency created by a multi-story building and underground parking. The development plan removes 30% of the existing trees on the property. The average residential tree loss is 30%. Residential saves more trees than commercial. 5. Does the development plan as proposed meet City code requirements. The following sections indicate that the plan meets City code requirements. PRELIMINARY PLAT/SITE PLAN The preliminary plat is a subdivision of 3.3 acres into one lot and road right-of-way for the future extension of Medcom Boulevard. A conservation easement is required over the southwest 1/3 of the site to protect the majority of the wooded slope. The request is to rezone the property from Rural to RM-2.5 for construction of a three story, 36 unit condominium building. The density is 11 units per acre. City code would permit up to 17.4 units per acre in the RM-2.5 Zoning District. The base area ratio is proposed at 15.5% with a floor area ratio at 46%. Code would pennit up to a 30% BAR and a 50% FAR in the RM-2.5 District. The building meets all setback requirements. Parking setbacks are 35 feet from the future Medcom Boulevard frontage and one-half of that setback, or 17.5 feet from Franlo Road. A total of 72 parking spaces are required for this development including at least one enclosed parking space for each unit. The plan shows 47 interior spaces and 25 exterior spaces for a total of 72 parking spaces meeting code requirements. Access to this site and underground parking is near the southeast comer of the property. This location meets a safe site vision distance for Franlo Road. No other access to Franlo Road is possible because of inadequate site distance. Sidewalks are proposed from the parking lot to the building and to a future sidewalk along an extended Medcom Boulevard. Staff recommends that 5 foot sidewalks be included along the front edge of the parking lot along the building to provide a safe access to the building. GRADINGIDRAINAGE The grading of the property will be limited to the building footprint, parking lot, and retaining wall construction area. Over one acre of the site will be placed in a conservation easement to protect the existing trees and steep slope. A number of significant oak trees will also be preserved in the northeast comer. \/. f:>. "\ (D EDEN HILLS CONDO!\ __ "~nUMS Staff Report October 20, 1995 The tree inventory indicates a total of 1,183 caliper inches of trees on site with 357 caliper inches proposed to be removed. This represents a 30% tree loss. The average tree loss in a residential development is 30%. A tree replacement of 143 caliper inches is required. Three four foot high retaining walls are proposed to minimize encroachment into the wooded, steep slope. These retaining walls should be masonry construction. All hard surface runoff, including roof runoff, will be collected by storm sewer. Due to steep slopes and trees, and the proposed direction of drainage, construction of an on-site NURP pond is not practical. The Engineering Department recommends a cash contribution be made to the storm water utility fund. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water is available to this site from lines in Franlo Road. The proponent will need to abandon any unused service stubs concurrent with building construction. LANDSCAPING Based on the building square footage, a total of 208 caliper inches, ranging in size between 2.5 and 5 caliper inches is required. Tree replacement is 143 caliper inches. The landscaping plan must provide a total of 351 caliper inches. The plan needs 193 additional inches of trees to meet City Code. The plan should also be revised to show the majority of trees as oak, ash, basswood and maple to be consistent with existing natural trees on site. The plan should also include a significant amount of evergreen plantings along the southeast corner of the site as shown on Attachment A for screening of the drive aisle and entrance from the south. ARCHITECTURE The 38 foot high, 3 story structure will be constructed with face brick, natural stone, and vinyl siding. City code requires the use of at least 75% face brick, natural stone, or glass as an exterior building material. The building exceeds this percentage in approved exterior materials. The use of a pitched roof and a number of gabled balcony extensions makes the building look residential. CONCLUSIONS The proposed Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential for 11 units per acre is a compatible and transitional density between Medium Density Residential projects to the south and west and commercial land use to the north. The proposal will generate less traffic than a commercial land use, and will preserve a significant amount of the natural vegetation. In addition, the condominium project will provide an additional alternative type of housing in the community . .4 V. 8. ~ I , EDEN HILLS CONDO. ..NIUMS Staff Report October 20, 1995 All technical aspects of the project have been met with the exception of the landscaping plan. This plan shall be revised prior to the City Council review. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Neighborhood Commercial to High Density Residential on 3.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to RM- 2.5 on 3.3 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.3 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 3.3 acres into one lot and road right-of-way based on plans dated October 11, 1995, this report, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscaping plan, providing for 351 caliper inches of plant material, and a majority use of oak, basswood and maple varieties. In addition, revise the landscaping plan as shown in Attachment A to provide for screening of the drive aisle and entrance from the south. B. Provide the 5 foot wide sidewalk along the front edge of the parking lot along the building to provide a safe access to the building. C. Submit samples of building materials and colors for review by the City Planner. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed stonn water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Submit conservation easement documents to the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources for his review. . 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit a recorded copy of the conservation easement to the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. B. Stake the proposed grading limits adjacent to the trees to be saved with snow fencing. Said fencing to be field inspected by the City Forester. C. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. D. Submit detailed plans for the construction of the retaining walls to the Inspections Department. Said retaining walls shall be constructed with modular masonry materials. ~ V. f>. -12.. EDEN HILLS COND&_ ~lNIUMS Staff Report October 20, 1995 4. Prior to building pennit issuance, the proponent shal1~ A. Make a cash contribution to the stonn water utility fund in lieu of a NURP pond based on 2% of the land value, plus $1,000 per acre of impervious surface. B. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping improvements indicated on the approved plan. C. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. D. Pay the cash park fee. ~ V. S. -\3 '. --....... ""-----. '"-. ----- ------'" ., ._--.. ........ ----------: .. -. --" ; i ! ---------. ~~T~Ti>©lJffi\ ~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METRO WATERS, 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106-6793 PHONE NO. 772-7910 FILE NO. October 19, 1995 Mr. Scott Kipp, Planner City of Eden Prairie Community Development Department 808 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Eden Hills Condominiums, Eden Lake (27-1011W), City of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Kipp: We have reviewed the site plans (received September 26, 1995) for Eden Hills Condominiums (Section 14, T116N, R22W) and have the following comments to offer: 1. Eden Lake (27-1011W) was not assigned a shoreland classification by the DNR and the project site does not appear to be in a shoreland district. 2. Eden Lake (27-1011 W), a Public Waters Wetland, is south of the proposed site. Any activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation of Eden Lake, which alters its course, current or cross-section, is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR permit. No OHW has been established for Eden Lake. This office should be contacted if there is any question about whether proposed activities will be within Eden Lake and arrangements can be made to determine the OHW. The wetland fringe of Eden Lake may not be under DNR Public Waters Permit jurisdiction. The project may be subject to federal and local wetland regulations. The Department may provide additional comments on the project through our review of applications submitted under these other regulatory programs. 3. It is good that stormwater will not be allowed to flow down the southwest slopes of the site to Eden Lake. However, the DNR would object if the stormwater from the site is not treated in a sedimentation pond before it flows into a DNR Public Water. If stormwater is routed directly to a streain or pond, it can cause sedimentation and water level bounces that are detrimental to wildlife values, aesthetic values, and water quality. We recommend that the impervious surface on the site be minimized as much as possible. 4. The site does not appear to be within a FEMA-designated floodplain district. V,S.-,S- AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mr. Scott Kipp, Planner October 19, 1995 Page 2 5. We wish to commend the developer for leaving the steep slopes on the site untouched. We recommend that the slopes be protected from erosion by allowing natural vegetation to grow upon them. The existing trees and landscaping will make the project site appear more natural from Eden Pond. 6. The following comments are general and apply to all proposed developments: a. Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken during the construction period. The guidelines listed in the MPCA publication Protectin2 Water Quality in Urban Areas -Best Management Practices in Minnesota or their equivalent should be followed. b. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. It typically takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. c. The comments in this letter address DNR -Division of Waters jurisdictional matters and concerns. These comments should not be construed as DNR support or lack thereof for a particular project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, k ~.)j-~~~ Joe Richter Hydrologist JRIcds c: Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Joe Yanta DNR Ecological Services, Wayne Barstad City of Eden Prairie Floodplain File City of Eden Prairie Shoreland File Eden Lake (27-10 11 W) V.5, -lb October 11, 1995 Mr. Chris Enger City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Dear Mr. Enger: Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering Co. 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55437 832-2600 Legal Advisor: Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 333-4800 The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District have reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the District for the Eden Hills Oondominiums project in Eden Prairie. The following policies and criteria of the District are applicable for this project: 1. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's revised rules and regulations, a grading and land alteration permit from the District is required. A detailed grading plan showing both existing and proposed contours must be submitted to the District for review. 2. A detailed erosion control plan outlining procedures to control sedimentation from leaving areas altered on the site must be submitted to the District for review and approval. 3. A storm water management plan for the project must be submitted for review and approval. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this development at an early date. If you have any questions or request additional information, please give me a call at 832-2857. BCOlkmh c: Ray Haik Fritz Rahr 2327053\30369-1 V,g. -l7 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and city Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: October 31, 1995 SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report for Eden Hills Condominiums BACKGROUND: This site is 3.3 acres and abuts Franlo Road 500 feet south of Prairie Center Drive. The proponent is requesting a zoning change from Rural to RM-2.5 and preliminary plat of the 3.3 acres into one lot and road right-of-way. The proposed plan is for a three-story condominium building with an adjacent parking area. The density for this project of 36 units results in 11.0 units per acre. ISSUES: Natural Resources/Tree Preservation This site is a mixed wooded area composed of open space from the former single family homes located on the two lots. The westerly woodland area includes ash, oak, and black locust trees. The most predominant feature is the scattered large bur oaks on the site that average two feet in diameter. The site has a total of 71 significant trees (over 12 inches in diameter) for a total of 1,183 diameter inches of significant trees. Development of the site as proposed would remove a total of 20 trees with a total of 357 diameter inches. This translates into a 30 % loss of significant trees on the site. Part of the tree inventory that was not included in the site are the trees along proposed Medcome Boulevard and two oak trees along Franco Road. Since the trees are located in the road right-of- way they are really not controlled by the developer. The staff in calculating tree loss did not include them in the total inventory or in the trees lost due to development. In the calculation of tree loss there are five large oak trees located adjacent to the central parking lot area, and main entrance to the building. Due to the amount of grading and compaction associated with construction these trees are counted as lost in a worse case scenario. It is hoped that specialized techniques can be used during the construction process, including exclusionary fence around the drip line of the trees, which will hopefully allow them to remain following completion of construction. 1 v. 6. \1. \ By formula of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, the tree replacement for this project is calculated at 143 caliper inches of replacement trees. In addition to the 143 caliper inches based on the zoning code the building needs an additional 208 caliper inches of landscaping. When added together this results in a total of 551 caliper inches of landscaping/tree replacement. The current plan does not show enough plant material nor does it reflect the majority cover type on the site. The plan should be revised prior to City Council approval to include trees such as oak, ash, basswood, and maple to be consistent with the existing natural conditions. To meet the landscaping and screening requirements a significant amount of evergreen tree plantings along the southeastern corner of the site need to be included in the plans. The staff is also recommending that the treed area west of the building be covered by a scenic and conservation easement to limit grading and other future activities. This easement would begin at the base of the retaining walls and go westerly to the property line. Storm Water Treatment The proposed plan does not include installation of a NURP pond. Due to the desire to save the majority of the woodlands on the undisturbed portion of the lot, as well as channeling the storm waters to minimize the impact on the retaining walls, the Engineering Department staff has recommended a cash contribution be made to the storm water utility fund. The developer is required to follow all Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District regulations and will need to submit a detailed grading plan to the Engineering Department prior to final plan approval. Sidewalks/Trails The current plan for sidewalks and trails in the vicinity of this project is attached to this report. This includes development of a sidewalk along both sides of Medcome Boulevard when that project is completed, as well as completion of the sidewalk on the east side of Franco Road linking the existing sidewalk segments. These sidewalks are not the responsibility of the developer for Eden Hills condominiums. The developer has internal sidewalk connections to Medcome Boulevard, which will allow residents to connect with the pedestrian system in this area. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their October 23, 1995 meeting. The project was approved as per the staff report recommendations dated October 20, 1995 on a 7-0 vote. The staff would recommend that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission approve the plan as proposed and further detailed in this staff report. SAF:mdd EdenHiII/Stuart 2 \J .8.11. 2- EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 8 landmark tree. He inquired about the age of the cottonwood trees on the site and Fox responded that they would be about 80 years old and about at the end of their life expectancy. Miller stated that because the cottonwoods are so old, Hennepin County was more concerned about saving the oak trees, which would live for some time yet. Hilgeman commented that there will be a good deal of replacement planting done in areas such as around the maintenance shed, and she would not be opposed to the developer planting a few cottonwoods as they were indigenous to the site. MOTION: Brown moved, Hilgeman seconded, to recommend approval of the request subject to the stipulations in the October 20, 1995 Planning Commission staff report and the trail recommendation set forth in the November 1, 1995 Memorandum prepared by staff. Motion carried unanimously. Jacobson inquired when the gold course would be completed and Miller responded about July, 1997. B. Eden Hills Condominiums by Brenwood Development Corporation Arne Zachman, representing Brenwood Development Corporation, was present, but did not wish to address the Commission. Fox reviewed the staff report and discussed the proposed tree replacement, which staff believed was insufficient to meet City requirements. A meeting was scheduled with the developer to address this issue. Brown inquired if Medcom Boulevard would be extended to Franlo Road, and Fox responded that it was planned to continue through, although some fill may need to be added in the area to make this possible. Koenig inquired about the scenic easements and the area involved. Fox responded that it will be at the base of the retaining walls downhill, and there would be an easement to prevent erosion. Brown inquired about the parking on the site, and Zachman responded that there will be one underground parking stall for each unit, with extra stalls available for those residents with more than one vehicle. He commented ~hat they have tried to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible, but there was going to be some tree loss no matter how the building was placed on the site. They endeavored to save the most significant trees on the site. Hilgeman asked about the tree replacement on the plans and Fox reviewed the landscape plan and noted that the numbers were not yet finalized, but it would give the Commission some idea of what was proposed. The plans will be revised to meet City Code requirements. v.B. \1.3 EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 9 Koenig asked abut the shrubs that the developer proposed to plant and if they included arborvitae. Fox responded that those had been replaced with other plantings which were not so inviting to the deer. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Brown seconded, to recommend approval of the Eden Hills Condominium development proposed by Brenwood Development as per the October 20, 1995 Planning Commission staff report, and Staff supplement of 10/31/95. Motion carried unanimously. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Fees Policy <continued from October 2, 1995 Lambert reviewed the proposed fees policy and noted that the concept of breaking down the programs and services into categories helped in arriving at the indirect costs which enabled staff to determine the direct costs. He believed that this recommendation was one that they could support. Bowman inquired how these fees changed from previous recommendations and Lambert responded that they will have to increase fees to get the projects to fit within the guidelines established by the Council. He noted that it may take two or three years to reach that point. Bowman inquired why the subsidy to the preschool programs was set at 15 % and Lambert responded that the City was in direct competition with other agencies for this service, but staff bel ieved it should be available. These fees could be more because there are other resources available. Hilgeman commented that the percentage for Adaptive Recreation seemed to be less than might be needed, and Lambert explained that it was combined with Integrated Recreation programs and they used the figures they were given. Brown inquired if the 20 % overhead costs were included in the percentages and Lambert responded affirmatively. Koenig inquired if efforts were planned to obtain subsidies from the public sector for these programs, and Lambert responded that was the intent. Hilgeman commented she believed it was good public relations for companies to sponsor events and programs for the City. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Brown seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed fee schedule per the Staff memo dated October 24, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. B. Option No. 1. KleinlPeterson Property Lambert reviewed the staff report and after describing the site and the erosion which is occurring, recommended that the Commission schedule a field trip for it.i .. DATE: CITY COUNCn. AGENDA NOVEMBER 21,1995 SECTION: DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. FINANCE PAYMENT Of CLAIMS VI CHECKS NUMBER 36209 THRU 36558 Action/Direction: NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36209 MINNESOTA UC FUND MN UC FUND 3RD QRT 95. 106.98 36210 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE 84555.97 WITHHOLDING PAYMENT PAYROLL 10-27-95. 36211 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT UNI PAYROLL 10-27-95. 900.00 36212 BELLBOY CORPORATION LIQUOR. 2127.00 36213 EAGLE WINE CO WINE. 1806.83 36214 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC LIQUOR. 31671.66 36215 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO LIQUOR/WINE. 56322.11 36216 PAUSTIS & SONS CO WINE. 1227.11 36217 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS LIQUOR/WINE. 29036.69 36218 PRIOR WINE CO WINE. 8059.96 36219 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO LIQUOR/WINE/4955. 16393.65 36220 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC WINE. 425.00 36221 THE WINE COMPANY WINE. 612.11 36222 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE. 1118.61 36223 CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL YOUTH TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. 143.78 36224 CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL YOUTH TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. 191.70 36225 DISCOVERY ZONE SPECIAL YOUTH TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. 127.37 36226 SKATEVILLE SPECIAL YOUTH TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. 95.85 36227 VOlv OUT CHECK 0.00 36228 SPENCER L CONRAD MN CHIEFS CONFERENCE MEETING EXPENSE/ 126.47 MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT. 36229 EUGENE DIETZ MEETING EXPENSE-ENGINEERING DEPT. 16.50 36230 BRENT GRIFFITH EMT TRAINING MATERIALS/PARKING-POLICE 45.85 DEPT. 36231 SCOTT KIPP MEETING EXPENSE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 3.00 36232 CYNTHIA J LAN ENBERG MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT. 67.20 36233 VOlv OUT CHECK 0.00 36234 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS FINAL 1995 REIMBURSEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF 43027.00 DEFERMENT. 36235 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY CAL ENGINEER LICENSE RENEWAL-DAILY BOILER 20.00 INSPECTION FOR WATER PLANT. 36236 SUPPLEES THI ENTERPRISES NOVEMBER RENT LIQUOR STORE II. 5175.93 36237 SYNOPTICS FACILITATOR FOR CHAPLAINS CONFERENCE-462.76 POLICE DEPT. 36238 MARC THIELMAN REIMBURSEMENT-TELEPHONE CHARGES. 31.24 36239 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC START CAPACITORS/SERVICE AND LABOR-SEWER 82.98 SYSTEM MAINTENANCE'. 36240 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER. 2947.64 36241 JIM ZAIC CLOTHING ALLOWANCE-INSPECTION DEPT. 60.00 36242 ROBIN ABRAHAM REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 6.00 36243 GINA BORDON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00 36244 JEFFREY BOYD REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 3.00 36245 ELLEN CRUMP REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 6.00 36246 LYNN EPPING REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00 36247 VIRGINIA ENGLEMAN REFUND-SENIOR FITNESS CLASS. 30.00 36248 CLAUDINE FASCHING REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY CLASS. 26.00 36249 ALISHA FAULSTICH REFUND-CRAZY QUILT PROJECT. 10.00 36250 KARIN HARRIS REFUND-HOLIDAY PHOTO COLLAGE CARD. 6.50 36251 CHERYL JACOBS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 36.00 28715445 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 1. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 36252 36253 36254 36255 36256 36257 36258 36259 36260 36261 36262 36263 36264 36265 36266 36267 36268 36269 36270 36271 36272 36273 36274 36275 36276 36277 36278 36279 36280 36281 36282 36283 36284 36285 36286 36287 MARY KNECHT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. MARILYN LEWIS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. ROBERT MEINKE REFUND-RETIREMENT STRATEGIES. ELIZABETH MURPHY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. LISA NEBEL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. TERRY PAETZEL REFUND-ART OF DRAWING AND PAINTING. TAUNYA SCHLIECHER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. ROBIN STEWART REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY. LINDA SUDMAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. KEIKO TAKAHASHI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. KEIKO TAKAHASHI REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY. DICK AND BETTY THORVIG REFUND-SENIOR LUNCHEON AND PLAY. KATHY WALTER REFUND-EMERGENCY WATER SAFETY. DIANE WEGSCHEID REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 10-23-95. CARVER COUNTY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SV PAYROLL 10-23-95. CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 10-23-95. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK SAVINGS BONDS PAYROLL 10-27-95. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 10-27-95. HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-23-95. HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-23-95. ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 10-23-95. MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-23-95. MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PAYROLL 10-23-95. MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 10-27-95. MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-27-95. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 10-27-95. AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING MATURE DRIVING CLASS-SENIOR CENTER. JOE APT TAL CHI CHIH INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR CENTER. BIFFS INC SEPT AND OCT 95 WASTE DISPOSAL-ADA EDEN PRAIRIE SENIORS FIRESIDE CORNER FERRELLGAS LINDA FROM FOX MCCUE & MURPHY GENUINE PARTS COMPANY PROGRAM/PARK MAINTENANCE/4375. REIMBURSEMENT FOR HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON. REFUND-MECHANICAL PERMIT. PROPANE-COMMUNITY CENTER. REFUND-ADULT TENNIS LESSONS. SERVICES-DECEMBER 31ST 1994 AUDIT. FUEL OIL AIR FILTERS/V BELTS/PWR OUTLET/ CLAMPS/PLUGS/WORK LAMP/VALVES/FITTINGS/ SPARK PLUGS/ROTOR/CLIPS/HOSE/PAINT/SEALS/ CUSHION/BULB/ARMOR ALL/HAL BULB/BALL JOINTS/CONTROLS/STARTER/CORES/ALARM/ GROMMET/BLADES/FLOOR MATS/TAIL LT/SHOP 36288 KARIN HARRIS 36289 ROBERT A HAUGEN SUPPLIES-FLEET SERVICES. REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS. REIMBURSEMENT -HANDBOXES AND BATTERIES FOR TRUCKS. 36290 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 36291 JOE KIESLING 36292 JUDY KRAUSE 6975626 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 POSTAL VERIFICATIONS-VOTER REGISTRATION/ ELECTIONS. REFUND-ESCROW FUND AND VARIANCE FEE. REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS. 2. VI 15.00 24.00 35.00 21.00 24.00 24.00 3.00 26.00 48.00 3.00 20.00 18.50 26.00 3.00 49.37 276.93 90.00 350.00 8360.50 240.46 275.08 4144.26 227.42 1251.50 247.00 25.00 41716.34 144.00 162.00 5239.98 162.55 46.75 178.28 26.00 1190.20 3745.76 26.00 130.58 197.76 936.04 26.00 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36293 MN SHAKESPEARE CO PERFORMANCE OF ROMEO AND JULIET-500.00 HISTORICAL CULTURE. 36294 BYRON MEYER INSTRUCTOR-INTERMEDIATE BRIDGE/SENIOR 134.40 CENTER. 36295 JANET MEYER INSTRUCTOR-PHOTA ALBUM WORKSHOP-SENIOR 10.00 CENTER. 36296 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CASTOR FORK/HOSE-FLEET SERVICES. 110.04 36297 KEITH NORD SPEAKER-YOUTH APPRECIATION DINNER. 500.00 36298 NORTHERN GENERATOR-STREET MAINTENANCE. 553.79 36299 ORDWAY MUSIC THEATRE DEPOSIT GROUP TICKETS-SENIOR CENTER. 276.00 36300 RICOH CORPORATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL. 626.86 36301 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 36302 JACK SCHEPERS MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE III. 91.00 36303 LISA WILDER INSTRUCTOR-MEMOIR WRITING-SENIOR CENTER. 112.50 36304 MARK AND KIM ZIERDEN EASEMENTS-GOLDEN RIDGE DRIVE. 2196.52 36305 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER/YOUTH RECREATION/ 109.93 AQUATICS. 36306 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 129.55 36307 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS-WATER PLANT/PARK MAINTENANCE/ 1122.73 FLEET SERVICES. 36308 MN COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLICATIONS-ENGINEERING DEPT. 109.00 36309 MENARDS GREEN TREAT/OAK VENEER/INSECT REPELLANT/ 254.99 GLUE/REFLECTIVE NUMBERS/BBQ TOOL SET-FIRE DEPT-FLEET SERVICES-FACILITIES. 36310 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSE. 1044.38 36311 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 10-27-95. 139.75 36312 MINNESOTA DEPT OF FINANCE APPLICATION DEPOSIT-INDUSTRIAL REVENUE 29000.00 BOND ALLOCATION. 36313 MINNESOTA DEPT OF FINANCE APPLICATION FEE-INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND 300.00 ALLOCATION. 36314 ACCENT REALTY REFUND-6365 CARLSON TR ACCOUNT 2308.57 #20321001541. 36315 BELLBOY CORPORATION BEER. 45.50 36316 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 12526.70 36317 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER. 26181.15 36318 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC BEER. 24.04 36319 LINCOLN DISTRIBUTING CO BEER. 80.00 36320 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 8037.44 36321 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX. 814.50 36322 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY MIX. 212.60 36323 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO BEER. 23.95 36324 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 20744.45 36325 LORETTA BODE REFUND-HIGHSCHOOL LUNCH AND PLAY. 18.50 36326 PATTY BOOSALIS REFUND-FIRST AID CLASS. 25.00 36327 DAVID BORDEN REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS. 26.00 36328 MARY BORNS REFUND-DANCELINE CLASS. 25.00 36329 SUSAN BYRON REFUND-FEAPFROGGERS GYMNASTICS CLASS. 14.32 36330 KATHY COSTELLO REFUND-STEP EXCERCISE CLASS. 15.00 36331 JOANNE FINNEGAN REFUND-DANCELINE CLASS. 25.00 36332 MRS GOON REFUND-JAZZ CLASS. 25.00 10849416 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 3. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36333 DAVE GOTHAM REFUND-TAE KWON DO CLASS. 29.00 36334 TERESA KOCHER REFUND-EXERCISE CLASS. 15.00 36335 PAULA VANDE LAARSCHOT REFUND-DANCELINE CLASS. 25.00 36336 ALLISON LUEDTKE REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. 21.66 36337 KRISTEN MICKECH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 36338 DORTHY MAKIE REFUND-DRIED APPLE WREATH CLASS. 5.00 36339 SUSAN MONTGOMERY REFUND-STEP EXCERCISE CLASS. 15.00 36340 STEPHANIE PETERSON REFUND-ADAPTIVE SWIMMING LESSONS. 30.00 36341 ELAYNA REINHARDT REFUND-STEP EXCERISE CLASS TRANSFER/STEP 12.00 EXCERISE DROPPED. 36342 DIANE REITZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 9.00 36343 ELAINE SMITH REFUND-CPR CLASS. 26.00 36344 ABBEY THORNE REFUND-CHASKA YOUTH TRIP. 21.00 36345 KATIE TRENT REFUND-DANCELINE CLASS. 25.00 36346 BRENDA UTING REFUND-JAZZ DANCE CLASS. 25.00 36347 JEAN VICK REFUND-HIGHSCHOOL LUNCH AND PLAY. 9.25 36348 DIANE WAGNER REFUND-DANCELINE. 25.00 36349 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING TUTION FOR 55 ALIVE/MATURE DRIVING CLASS 240.00 NOVEMBER 1 3 95. 36350 CLIFF CRACAUER REFUND-MILEAGE. 151.20 36351 MARK GUSTAD REIMBURSE FOR EM! TRAINING EXPENSES. 168.45 36352 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE PLUG CLEANOUT/CAP/LETTERS/MAILBOX/POLY 88.61 EDGING/DUCK TAPE/FASTENERS/HARDWARE/KNIFE/ BLADES/BATTERYS/RUST SPRAY-PARK MAINTENANCE/COMMUNITY CENTER/STREET DEPT. 36353 MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA TICKETS TO NUTCRACKER FANTASY DEC 16TH AT 454.00 2 PM. 36354 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE. 341.12 36355 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE. 50189.82 36356 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. 5003.95 36357 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 36358 SHEEHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CITY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT-WELL PUMPHOUSES 6478.05 11 AND 12. 36359 BROWN & CRIS INC CITY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT-MITCHELL ROAD/ 40560.73 TECHNOLOGY DR PROJECT-FINAL. 36360 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP CITY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT-CITY WEST PKWY 7127.11 GOLDEN RIDGE DR. 36361 F F JEDLICKI CITY IMPROVEMNET CONTRACT-ATHERTON 27067.32 TOWNHOMES DRAINAGE STUDY. 36362 F F JEDLICKI CITY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT-OLYMPIC HILLS 25851.88 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 36363 REHBEIN INC CITY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT-1995 LIME 202720.69 RESIDUAL REMOVAL. 36364 ACTION THREADED PRODUCTS SUPPLIES-UTILITIES DIVISION. 81.65 36365 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 201 . 19 36366 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/CITY HALL. 2616.00 36367 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY SWIMMING CERTIFICATES-COMMUNITY CENTER. 40.47 36368 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC ORANGE FLAGS-STREET DEPT. 66.56 36369 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING OCTOBER DISPOSAL OF WILDLIFE-ANIMAL 286.83 CONTROL DEPT. 37005254 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 4. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36370 MARTIN ANDERSON REHAB PROGRAM-MARTIN ANDERSON. 808.97 36371 ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY ROLLER RENTAL/FUEL/NOZZLE-STREET 573.65 MAINTENANCE-FLEET SERVICES. 36372 ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNIC AMM POLICY ADOPTION MEETING EXPENSE. 50.00 36373 DON ATKINS BALES-PARK MAINTENANCE. 25.00 36374 ASSOCIATION OF MN EMERGENCY MANAG 1996 AMEM DUES-POLICE DEPT. 20.00 36375 BACONS ELECTRIC CO REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE-WATER TREATMENT 270.00 PLANT. 36376 BARKER HAMMER ASSOC INC CHEWING GUM REMOVER/SURE PASS/PRE OIL 193. 15 BREAK/STEAM PLUS-FACILITIES. 36377 BAUER BUILT INC STOCK-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 190.12 36378 BCA TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT TRAINING EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT. 240.00 36379 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC TIRES-COMMUNTIY CENTER. 363.17 36380 BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 363.67 36381 BENIEK LAWN SERVICE SERVICE-LAWN MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE. 628.35 36382 L M CIT INSURANCE CLAIM-RONALD BURCHETT. 1112.09 36383 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO REPAIRS-FIRE DEPT. 169.61 36384 BROAlXAJAY AWARDS FISHING TROPHY-COMMUNITY CENTER. 12.27 36385 NATHAN BUCK SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL/BASKETBALL OFFICIAL. 402.50 36386 BUILVING RESTORATION CO EXTERIOR CLEANING OF BUILDING-UTILITIES 5756.00 DIVISION. 36387 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER FILTER-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 47.36 36388 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA ASSEMBLY-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 127.16 36389 CARGILL SALT DIVISION DEICING SALT-STREET MAINTENANCE. 4336.41 36390 CBI NA-CON INC CONTRACT-2.0 MMG COMPOSITE ELEVATED TANK. 67945.47 36391 CITY OF CHASKA USE OF GOLF COURSE-YOUTH RECREATION. 555.00 36392 JAKE CHRISTENSEN SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 85.00 36393 BILL CLARK OIL CO GEAR LUBE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 418.62 36394 C02 SERVICES C02-COMMUNITY CENTER. 38.08 36395 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS PLIER TOOL/GLOVES/TOOL KIT/MULTISNIP/ 307.57 FLASHLIGHT/BATTERY-SAFETY DEPT-UTILITIES. 36396 COpy EQUIPMENT INC REPAIRS-PARK MAINTENANCE. 96.52 36397 CORPORATE REPORT PUBLICATIONS-ASSESSING DEPT. 29.00 36398 CRYSTEEL DIST INC SNOW CATCHER KIT-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 19.87 36399 CTL COMPANY INC KEY CHAINES-POLICE DEPARTMENT. 66.82 36400 CUB FOODS SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 45.02 36401 CUSTOM HEADSETS INC HEADSET REPAIR-POLICE DEPT. 63.96 36402 CULLIGAN -METRO SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER. 36.60 36403 DALCO MUTIFOLD TOWELS/PAPER TOWELS/GLASS 258.43 CLEANER/SPONGES/SPRAY BOTTLE/DEOD BLOCKS/ AIR PUMP-COMMUNITY CENTER-WATER PLANT. 36404 DEM CON LANDFILL INC CONCRETE/DEMOLITION DISPOSAL-STREET DEPT/ 100.55 PARK MAINTENANCE. 36405 DEM CON LANDFILL INC CONCRETE/DEMOLITION DISPOSAL -PARK 229.50 MAINTENANCE/STRRET DEPT. 36406 DELEGARD TOOL CO RECHARGEABLE LIGHT/COMB/RACHET/CURVED 739.17 JAWS/BATTERYS/SCREW SET/DRILL BITS-FLEET SERVICES. 36407 DIESEL SERVICE COMPANY TURBO CHARGER-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 341 .46 36408 GARY DIETHELM GRAVE PREP-FERRIS BURIAL. 275.00 8734112 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 5. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36409 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS INC SAFETY INSPECTIONS-FLEET SERVICES/FIRE 2689.20 DEPT. 36410 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIV PEST ELIMINATION-COMMUNITY CENTER. 90.53 36411 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD PARTS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 290.60 36412 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 USE OF CENTRAL MIDDLE SCHOOL GYM-1076.90 BASKETBALL/FIELD TRIPS-MAPLEWOOD/EAGAN/ COMO ZOO/CIRCUS PIZZA/SKATEVILLE-YOUTH REC ADAPTIVE REC. 36413 CITY OF EDINA SEPTEMBER 95 WATER TESTING~ATER DEPT. 325.00 36414 SANDY EHRICH THROW AWAY CAMERAS-TEEN PROGRAM SNAP IT 31.90 AT THE ZOO. 36415 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC CARBON MONOXIDE/NITROGEN DIOXIDE-128.69 COMMUNITY CENTER. 36416 ENVIROMATIC CORPORATION OF AMERIC CLEAN KITCHEN HOODS GREASE EXHAUST VENT 574.25 SYSTEMS. 36417 ERIE LANDMARK CO SIGNS-HERITAGE CENTER/PARKS AND REC DEPT. 208.75 36418 FERRELLGAS PROPANE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 147.61 36419 FIRE DEPT SAFETY OFFICERS ASSOC RENACT ACTIVE MEMBERSHIP-FIRE DEPT. 75.00 36420 FIBROCOM SERVICE-POLICE DEPT. 398.99 36421 FISHER ENTERPRISE TOPSOIL-PARK MAINTENANCE. 820.05 36422 FRANKLIN QUEST CO STORAGE BINDER/REFILL-INSPECTION DEPT. 30.30 36423 LYNDELL FREY REIMBURSE FOR HALLOWEEN PARTY SUPPLIES. 14.38 36424 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE AND RESCUE REPAIR/REPLACEMENT PARTS-FIRE DEPT. 125.29 36425 G & K SERVICES UNIFORM EXPENSE-WATER DEPT/FLEET 643.76 MAINTENANCE/PARK MAINTENANCE/UTILITIES. 36426 G & K SERVICES UNIFORM EXPENSE-FLEET SERVICES/PARK 207.54 MAINTENANCE. 36427 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES SERVICE CONTRACT-FINANCE DEPT. 45.00 36428 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER. 84.08 36429 GE CAPITAL COPIER MAINTENANCE-SENIOR CENTER. 134.75 36430 GENERAL MILLS INC REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER DAMAGE DEPOSIT. 50.00 36431 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO PENCILS/HANDTRUCK/PAPER-UTILITIES. 132.98 36432 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP INSTALL FOAM-PRO AND ELECTRIC CONTROL 12640.60 VALVE-FIRE DEPT. 36433 GILLUNV ENTERPRISES CHAIN LUBE-STREET MAINTENANCE. 103.20 36434 GINA MARIAS INC MEETING EXPENSE-FIRE DEPT. 21.27 36435 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 74.53 36436 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SVC TUBE/STOCK/PAINT RIM/PUMP FLUID/SCRAP 1480.43 TIRE DISPOSAL/TIRE-FLEET SERVICE/54348. 36437 W W GRAINGER INC TIMER-FLEET MAINTENANCE/FACILITIES. 96.46 36438 HANSEN THORP PEL LINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-RICE MARSH LAKE HAWTHORNE OF EDEN 821.25 PRAIRIE 3RD ADD. 36439 PETER J HARMS SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 93.50 36440 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE OCT 25TH BUFFET DINNER-SENIOR CENTER. 580.50 36441 D C HEY COMPANY INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-INSPECTION DEPT. 28.60 36442 tARRY G HILLARD SERVICE-ATTENDANT OPEN GYM-FEES PAID. 180.00 36443 VOW OUT CHECK 0.00 36444 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF ASSESSING MEMBERSHIP DUES-ASSESSING DEPT. 45.00 36445 ISFSI MEMBERSHIP DUES-FIRE DEPT. 60.00 36446 INTERIOR DESIGN PUBLICATIONS-FACILITIES. 37.97 2458886 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 6. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36447 INTOXIMETERS INC INTOXIMETERS-POLICE DEPT. 1075.29 36448 JMA BUILDERS REPAIRS-CUMMINS GRILL. 3295.00 36449 BRENVA JERVE SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 280.00 36450 CRAIG JERDE SERVICE-HOST-FEES PAID. 360.00 36451 CHRIS JESSEN SERVICE-HOCKEY OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 75.00 36452 E F JOHNSON CO SERVICE-POLICE DEPT. 64.97 36453 J J KELLER & ASSOC INC PUBLICATIONS-UTILITIES. 334.96 36454 LISA KLOCKZIEM SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 420.00 36455 KNOX LUMBER LANDSCAPE TIMBERS RILEY LAKE-PARK 1742.35 MAINTENANCE. 36456 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 2.05 36457 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY BEAKERS/BUNGEE CORDS/GLOVES/CLOCK/ 307.57 BATTERIES/RESPIRATOR-SAFETY DEPT- UTILITIES DIVISION. 36458 LAGERQUIST CORPORATION ELEVATOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER. 228.00 36459 LAKE COUNTRY DOOR INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC EYES-FIRE 975.00 STATIONS. 36460 tAKE REGION VENDING SUPPtIES-LIQUOR STORES. 1635.40 36461 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCTS I DIRT-STREET DEPT. 70.00 36462 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD SEPTEMBER PROSECUTION SERVICES-POLICE 15720.00 DEPT/TEMAN LAND MUSICLAND GROUP/FtYING CtOUD AIRPORT/CENTRUM INC COMSTOCK AND DAVIS-CITY HALL SEPTEMBER CHARGES. 36463 LANO EQUIPMENT INC UTlt FRAME-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 79.88 36464 J H LARSON ELECTRICAt CO FLUORESCENT BULBS-FACILITIES. 652.91 36465 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL FOR OCTOBER. 624.51 36466 tUNDS MEETING EXPENSE-HISTORICAL CENTER. 155.76 36467 MAlt BOXES ECT POSTAGE EXPENSE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 64.59 36468 MASYS CORPORATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT. 1429.70 36469 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTED SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPARTMENT. 389.16 36470 MCGLYNN BAKERIES INC MEETING EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT/SENIOR CENTER/ 176.48 INSPECTION DEPT/SAFETY DEPT/PARKS DEPT. 36471 MENARDS DUCTS/GARAGE PULL/STUD FINDER/HAMMER/ 53.67 SCREWS/LABOR-PARK MAINTENANCE-FLEET SERVICES. 36472 METRO SALES INC COPIER SERVICE AND SUPPtIES-CITY HAtt. 894.60 36473 METROPOtITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER S WASTE WATER SERVICE FOR DECEMBER 1995. 163987.00 36474 MICROGRAPHIC SERVICES UNIT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 16.32 36475 MIDWEST ASPHAtT CORP ASPHAtT-STREET DEPT. 21.67 36476 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS PENS/MARKERS/TABS/PROTECTOR SHEETS/ 1044.03 PENCILS/FILES/TONER/BINDERS/ENVELOPES/ MAPTACK/CtIPS/WHITEBOARD CLEANER/PADS- CITY HALL. 36477 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 358.61 36478 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGING SERVICE-INSPECTION DEPT. 146.88 36479 MINNEAPOLIS DEPT OF HEALTH AND FA tABORATORY ANALYSES FOR SEPT AND OCT-50.80 POLICE DEPT. 36480 STATE OF MINNESOTA OPERATION AND CONNECTION CHARGES-POLICE 990.00 DEPT. 36481 MINNESOTA SUN PUBtICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES/223433. 567.40 19828956 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 7. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36482 MINUTEMAN PRESS SUPPLIES-INSPECTION DEPT. 205.81 36483 MPWA REGISTRAR 2635 CONFERENCE EXPENSE-ENGINEERING DEPT. 695.00 36484 WM MUELLER & SONS INC CONCRETE SAND-PARK MAINTENANCE/STREET 2220.04 MAINTENANCE. 36485 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES. 1662.31 36486 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 779.65 36487 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB CONCESSION SUPPLIES FOR RESALE-COMMUNITY 733.79 CENTER. 36488 NORCOSTO INC COSTUME RENTAL-OUTDOOR CENTER. 29.95 36489 NORTH STAR ICE ICE-LIQUOR STORES. 507.15 36490 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY INSTALL OWN OPERATE MAINTAIN THE OVERHEAD 343384.00 AND UNDERGROUND STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM AT PRAIRIE CENTER DR AND SINGLETREE LANE. 36491 TIM NOTHWEHR SERVICE-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM-FEES PAID. 67.50 36492 OHLIN SALES INC BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT. 408.34 36493 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN SUPPLIES-STREET DEPT. 35.63 36494 OPERATOR SERVICES CERTIFICATION MANUALS-WATER PLANT. 175.00 36495 PAPCO JANITORIAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 20.90 36496 PAPER WAREHOUSE INC SENIOR DINNER-POLICE DEPT. 39.06 36497 PARKS IDE PRINTING INC NOV/DEC 95 SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER 627.87 PRINTING. 36498 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 73.50 36499 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING ENVELOPES-SENIOR CENTER. 23.22 36500 PRECISION TURF AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZER-PARK MAINTENANCE. 16213.56 36501 PRINTERS SERVICE INC KNIFE SHARP-COMMUNITY CENTER. 72.50 36502 THE PROMOTION GROUP SUPPLIES-SAFETY DEPT. 73.53 36503 PRO SOURCE FITNESS ANKLE STRAPS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 28.45 36504 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC T SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS. 388.29 36505 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL FEES FOR NOVEMBER/3135983. 538.51 36506 RAINBOW FOODS MEETING EXPENSE-OUTDOOR CENTER. 57.97 36507 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED TOOL BOX-FLEET SERVICES. 545.20 36508 RITE WAY MOBILE HOME REPAIR INC BLOCK AND ANCHOR MOBILE HOME-PRAIRIE VIEW 520.00 PARK. 36509 RITZ CAMERA FILM AND FILM DEVELOPING-CITY HALL. 78.46 36510 ROGERS SERVICE REPAIRS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 62.26 36511 ROLLINS OIL CO FUEL-FLEET SERVICES. 6160.30 36512 R & R SPECIALTIES INC SPREADER CLOTH-COMMUNITY CENTER. 28.54 36513 RUFF CUT WEED CUTTING-FORESTRY DEPT. 35.00 36514 SANCO INC SCRUB N SHINE/TISSUE/PINE DSNFCNT CLNR/ 442.64 GLOVES/SQUEEGEE-FACILITIES/COMMUNITY CENTER. 36515 SEARS TOOL CHEST/TOOL SET/SERVICE STARTER-PARK 500.56 MAINTENANCE-FACILITIES. 36516 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE. 282.57 36517 SIGNUM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC SUPPLIES-FACILITIES/STREET MAINTENANCE. 370.62 36518 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING PRINTING PAY DAY EXTRA. 183.58 36519 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSE-ASSESSING/CITY HALL/ 67.37 ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE/SENIOR ISSUES. 36520 ERIC SIT SERVICE-TAE KWON DO INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. 436.80 36521 PETER N SMITH SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 175.00 37895043 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 8. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 VI 36522 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION JAW CAP/BITS/LAMP/PRY BAR/SPRING-FLEET 204.96 MAINENANCE/UTILITIES. 36523 SNELL MECHANICAL INC OCTOBER MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT-549.00 COMMUNITY CENTER. 36524 SPS COMPANIES SUPPLIES-WATER PLANT. 260.13 36525 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS BID ADVERTISING-COMMUNITY CENTER. 68.75 36526 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC LEGAL ADVERTISING FOR OCTOBER/EMPLOYMENT 585.65 ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES. 36527 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO SUPPLIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS. 56.40 36528 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ UNIFORM EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT. 111. 72 36529 STAR TRIBUNE INSERTS BULK DROP-SENIOR CENTER. 94.40 36530 STAR TRIBUNE NEWSPAPERS FOR RESALE-LIQUOR STORE III. 29.20 36531 STR SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION REPAIR COOLER-LIQUOR STORE I. 198.62 36532 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PAN ASSM/GASKET/CYLINDER-FLEET 92.52 MAINTENANCE. 36533 SUTER ELECTRONICS TV VCR REPAIR-OUTDOOR CENTER. 149.74 36534 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE PUMP HOLDING TANK-PARK MAINTENANCE3. 190.00 36535 TARPS INC TARP REPAIR-STREET DEPT. 15.64 36536 TIE SYSTEMS INC OF MN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL. 7634.50 36537 TKDA & ASSOC INC SERVICE-CITY CENTER ENTRANCE 1595.66 MODIFICATIONS. 36538 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY HALLOWEEN PARTY-SPECIAL EVENTS. 98.26 36539 TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE REPAIR DEDUCTIBLE-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 100.00 36540 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO NITROGEN/OXYGEN/ACETLYENE-FLEET SERVICES 144.60 RENTAL BALLOON FILLER-FIRE DEPT. 36541 THIRTY THREE MINUTE PHOTO FILM AND FILM DEVELOPING-POLICE DEPT/ 375.28 PARKS DEPT/SAFETY DEPT/UTILITIES/FIRE DEPT/ASSESSING DEPT. 36542 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BATTERY/PAGER GLOVE HOLDER/KEY HOLDER/ 302.96 UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT. 36543 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC STOCK SUPPLIES-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 1146.99 36544 VERIFONE PRINTER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER. 84.82 36545 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHTING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES. 161.88 36546 WARNING LITES OF MN REFLECTIVE VESTS-STREET DEPT. 216.24 36547 WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE WASTE DISPOSAL FOR OCTOBER LIQUOR STORE I. 91.96 36548 WATERPRO SUPPLIES-INSPECTION DEPT/WATER PLANT. 6342.26 36549 WBCS HERITAGE SITE FORMS AND REVISIONS. 37.00 36550 JOEL WESTACOTT VIDEO SERVICES-STARING LAKE CONCERT 134.94 SERIES/PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL MEETING/LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS. 36551 WILCOX AND WILLIAMS SNOW SHOE INVENTORY/SHOW SHOE KITS FOR 803.85 RESALE-OUTDOOR CENTER. 36552 THE WORK CONNECTION SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE. 620.48 36553 X-ERGON SUPPLIES-WATER DEPARTMENT. 409.98 36554 YALE INC REPAIRS~ATER TREATMENT PLANT. 247.50 36555 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS FREIGHT-PUBLIC WORKS. 186.99 36556 ZACKS INC CORDS/HANDLE/HAMMER/VEHICLE BRUSH/SCOOP/ 193.88 PICK AX/RATCHET STRAP/DRAIN SPADE- UTILITIES DIVISION. 36557 ZACKS INC SUPPLIES-UTILITIES. 387.76 2392452 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 9. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 36558 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 36559 ZIEGLER INC 36560 VOIV OUT CHECK 34001 VOID OUT CHECK 35899 VOID OUT CHECK 35931 VOID OUT CHECK 35955 VOID OUT CHECK 35988 VOID OUT CHECK 36024 VOID OUT CHECK 36082 VOID OUT CHECK 36094 VOID OUT CHECK 36153 VOID OUT CHECK 36100 VOID OUT CHECK 36138 VOID OUT CHECK 36154 VOID OUT CHECK -1600548 NOVEMBER 21, 1995 FIRST AID SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT/STREET DEPT/ PARK MAINTENANCE/FLEET SERVICES/COMMUNITY CENTER. REPAIRS-POLICE DEPT. 10. VI 427.54 342.54 0.00 6855.65- 5923.34- 0.00 124.28- 1252.28- 117.04- 190.00- 90.04- 91.00- 553.79- 1545.18- 32.96- $1532546.42 DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Nov. 21, 1995 SECTION: Petitions, Requests & Communications DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Administration Request from Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce to Review Position VIII.A. Statement on the Flying Cloud Airport Requested Action: The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce requests the City Council to review the Chamber's recently adopted Position Statement regarding expansion of the Flying Cloud Airport. The Chamber desires that the City become an equal partner with the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Airports Commission in the upcoming EIS process for the airport expansion. Representatives from the Chamber will be present to address this issue. Attached also are recent articles from the Eden Prairie News regarding the proposed expansion. EDEN PRAIRIE October 27, 1995 Carl Jullie City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Request to Place Position Statement on Flying Cloud Airport on November 7, 1995 Eden Prairie City Council Agenda Dear Carl, The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee has been following the process undertaken by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and City of Eden Prairie officials to resolve the issues surrounding upgrades at Flying Cloud Airport. We have reviewed the July 1995 report on the discussion process concerning Flying Cloud Airport long-term comprehensive plan and have drafted the following position statement in response to that report. (A copy is enclosed) The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors has voted to approve the position statement as presented and to forward copies to the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Eden Prairie City Council to review and approve at their November 7 meeting. We would ask to be notified as to whether or not this could be considered a meeting agenda item, and if they would prefer to have a representative from the Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce make a brief presentation on the position statement. Thank you for your consideration. President Ivl Enc!. 250 Prairie Center Drive, #300 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • Phone (612) 944-2830 EDEN PRAIRIE Chamber of Comnlerce ISSUE: EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE POsmON STATEMENT ON FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce believes that provision of safe, modem, and accessible facilities at Flying Cloud Airport is of major importance to businesses in Eden Prairie. For years, issues have existed regarding the adequacy of certain facilities at the Airport. From our standpoint, insufficient progress has been accomplished to date to resolve these issues. Our two principal concerns are: 1) Slow progress in determining needed improvements and in proceeding to implement those improvements. 2) Strained working r!!lationship between the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and the City of Eden Prairie. This difficulty has obscured items of common interest between these two agencies and has hindered the process of establishing an outcome that is satisfactory to both parties. We believe that the preceding difficulties need to be rectified and that a cooperative process needs to be initiated promptly whereby the MAC, the City of Eden Prairie, and all other interested parties work together to study potential needed improvements at the Airport, to decide which improvements should be implemented, and to establish an action plan for completion of those improvements. PosmON: The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce believes that the following two items are especially important in terms of resolving current difficulties and meeting future needs for Flying Cloud Airport: 1) In March 1995 the Metropolitan Council initiated a discussion process involving the MAC and City of Eden Prairie to address issues concerning the Flying Cloud Airport Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP). This process has been completed and resulted in a report dated July 1995 which describes the six key issues that need to be addressed. We urge the Metropolitan Council, MAC and the City of Eden Prairie to proceed on a joint partnership basis to resolve these issues in a manner that is satisfactory to all parties. 2) As a further step in implementing a partnership relationship involving the Metropolitan Council, MAC and City of Eden Prairie, we urge these agencies to establish a joint management team for completing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Flying Cloud Airport. This joint management team, which would have balanced representation from the three agencies, would be responsible for selecting a consultant to prepare the EIS and for managing the conduct of the EIS work. The Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce urges the Metropolitan Council, MAC and City of Eden Prairie to promptly follow through on the two preceding points. We intend to provide additional input soon on the issues that need to be addressed in the forthcoming EIS process. We desire ongoing participation in the study of potential improvements at Flying Cloud Airport and will provide our full resources to assist the Metropolitan Council, MAC and City of Eden Prairie in this process. Approved by the Board of Directors on October 25, 1995 250 Prairie Center Drive, #300 • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • Phone (612) 944-2830 Eclat Prairie ~~~S /a/I'I 19S MAC reaffirms Flying Cloud expansion. plan' By Mark A. Weber If you're following the: bouncing ball concerning theFJying Cloud Air- port's proposed expansion,. turn your gaze to ... the Metropolitan CounciL The Metro Council will be taking up the expansion issue again after the airport's owner -the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) -on Tuesday reaffirmed its· long-range plans for a larger airfield at Flying Cloud. The MAC wants to expand run- way and building areaSl at Flying Cloud to primarily accommodate small-jet traffic, but issues raised by citizens and Eden Prairie city officials hav:e created extra review by several agencies. . . Earlier this year the Metro Coun- cil, which must approve Flying. Cloud's expansion plans,. asked the city and MAC to meet in "mediation?' sessions to explore issues-related to building proposal. Those: sessions didn't resolve major differences. be-- tween the two -the city continues to oppose the MAC expansion plans - and MAC panels this fall have been reaffirming the agency's proposals. On Tuesday the full MAC became the latest of thosepanels to re-endorse Flying Cloud's expanded future, meaning the expan,sion:issue:returns to Metro Council purview; The MAC, which in early 1996 is expected to discuss a variety of issues related to Twin Cities-are~ reliever' airport system' that includes Flying' Cloud, also on Tuesday agreed to get new cost estimates for the land it needs. to acquire: before: Flying Cloud is expanded. But that process is not expected to delay theMettoCouncil's review.' The city will keep raising-expan- sion issues such as high cost and lia- bility; said Scott Kipp. a planner with the Community and Economic Devel- opment Department. "If anything, we've educated some of; the MAC commissioners on some of the: issues we've been raising throughout this process," Kipp said. "We'1I keep rais- ing those issues to get geople tbink-. ing~ '" ' c~:;. \ . tdt'hl ltd." iC NClJJS J Nou.lt; iq9l irport'sexpansion headed for·debate The 7-year-old proposal to :expand Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie could be voted on by Metropolitan Council members next month. By Mark A. Weber Flying Cloud Airport and Flying Cloud Landfill are separated only by Highway 169/212, but proximity isn't all they have in common. Eden Prairie city officials and resi- dents spent 8Y2 years fighting a proposal to expand the now-closed landfill. A more recent debate over expanding Flying Cloud Airport, an expansion first pro- posed in 1988, is approaching that status . in duration if not intensity. I But the decision process could speed , up in the months ahead, and members of the agency that will help decide the ex- pansion issue -the Metropolitan Coun- cil -got a firsthand look at the Eden Prairie facility last week. The regional planning agency, which . has had the expansion issue before it for II several years, is tentatively scheduled to debate and vote on the airport plan next month, starting with its Transportation I Committee on Dec. 4 and the full Metro 'Council on Dec. 21. Endorsement of the plan -calling for more hangar areas and a I, lOO-foot ex- tension of an east-west runway -could set the airport's owner, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), on its way toward preparing the required environ- mental impact statement. Chauncey Case, a transportation plan- ner for the Metro Council, said the Nov. 9 tour helped give council members more information about the airport proposal. About half of the council's members took part. Eden Prairie city staff and two city council members also attended the tour. .,,, ... , ........ , .... , . .,, .. ,.,.,"' .. I" ALAN NITCHI\ IAN (center) of Elliott A"iation, a F1ying Cloud Airport business, explains the airport's operation to local and Metro Council officials. A tour was held Nov. 9 to prepare council members for their upcoming re"iew of airport expansion plans. (Photo by Mark A. Weber) "Rather than dealing with general ideas or mythology. I thought it would be better to go out and look at it," Case said. "If you look at some of the maps, you don't really get the scale of things, the lay of the land. "It was a good way for them to get a feel for the place," MAC for, city against In the process, Metro Council members also heard two different views on whether the runway expansion should proceed. Eden Prairie city officials reit- erated their opposition to the plan, saying westward runway expansion would eat up as many as 250 acres of land the city has long counted on for residential development and property-tax revenue. "It's millions of dollars of im- pact to us," said Assistant City Man- ager Chris Enger. Merely changing Aying Cloud's long-term plan to allow expansion would also raise liability issues, the city contends, with landowners in the path of that expansion suddenly finding their development rights re- duced. Further, Enger charges that MAC has grossly underestimated land acquisition costs. "We're probably more con- vinced than ever," said Enger, "that this is not a good thing to go for- ward with." That view was countered last week by Alan Nitchman, general manager of Elliott Aviation and president of the Aying Cloud Air- port Business Association, and also by members of MAC. They said the airport's 3,900-foot, east-west run- way and its 20,OOO-pound weight restriction limit the capability of Flying Cloud to accommodate small corporate jets. As a result, airport businesses' ability to grow and Fly- ing Cloud's ability to relieve small- jet traffic at Minneapolis-St. Paul In- ternational Airport are limited. they added. "The company I work for was told 25 years ago there was going to be 5,000 feet of runway," said Nitchman, who estimated that Aying Cloud rep- resents a $32 million economic boost to airport firms and the community. "Five thousand feet," he added, "is a way to grow our business." Safety zones debated Those disparate views of airport expansion were reflected in mediation sessions held this summer between the city and MAC. While those sessions, ordered by the Metro Council, did not result in a consensus they did put more information on the table. MAC has also agreed to reap- praise the cost of land needed for its project. But it has also reaffirmed its intention to expand the airport. While Metro Council members last week gave no indications of their upcoming vote, there was informal talk of reducing the amount of land acquired for the expansion. Minnesota is unusual, according to airport officials, in that its state law requires an additional safety zone - a safety zone "B," beyond safe- ty zone ";\" -around airports. Ad- hering to that law would mean that up to I 00 acres ofland west of Eden Prairie Road would need to be ac- quired and saddled with develop- ment restrictions. Council members last week wondered if zone "B" is really needed for safety's sake, and whether it could be revised or elim- inated to make more Eden Prairie land developable and reduce MAC's expansion costs. The Metro Council's Case said the safety zone issue will be stud- ied before his staff offers recom- mendations on the airport plan, ei- ther as it relates to Aying Cloud Airport specifically or regional air- pdrts overall. "I think we have some options," he said. But Scott Kipp of the city's Community and Economic Devel- opment Department said that if the runway expansion is being planned for the sake of aircraft sake -as MAC has touted -then the addi- tional safety zone should not be casuallv discarded. "To undermine or change the purpose of those zones,': Kipp said, "certainly does not relate to safety very weI!." EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11121/95 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO. XI. Cl DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Recreation Program Fee Policy Recreation and Facilities Robert A. Lambert~ BACKGROUND: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed staff reports on existing and proposed recreation program fees at the September 18 and October 2 meetings. At the October 2 meeting there was extensive discussion regarding which programs should be subsidized and the rationale for subsidizing various programs at different levels of subsidy. There was also discussion re~arding the 20 % indirect cost that has been added to the program cost to determine subsidy levels. The Commission generally agreed with the 20 % cost as a standard to use to determine the true cost above direct costs for providing various recreation programs. The Commission requested staff to "establish categories with some recommended subsidy percentages n and to bring that recommendation back to the Commission at the next meeting. In early October, the recreation staff reviewed a very interesting article regarding other communities evaluating their mission and the types of service they bring to the community. The article referred to Stillwater, Oklahoma Parks and Recreation Board's mission and the results of a task force that studied the basic types of service the Park and Recreation Department brings to that community. The task force broke down the services to four levels: basic service, enhanced service, fee assisted service, and fee supported service. The recreation staff believe that the definition for each of these services provides a basis for major program categories and defining maximum subsidy levels within these areas of service. BASIC SERVICES: Basic services are those that every taxpayer is entitled to receive -playground programs, drop-in· recreation such as free skating and swimming beaches, as well as services for seniors and the disabled. These programs and services guarantee all residents access to basic recreation programs and facilities. Subsidies within the basic services would range from 40 % to 120 %. The programs subsidized at 120 % would be free programs, with 100 % direct costs, plus 20 % indirect costs charged to the program. ENHANCED SERVICES: Enhanced services include special events or activities Ito which the community is invited without a fee. These events promote the City, our history, and our quality of life, and do have potential for outside sponsorship or partners. Examples of these programs are the community wide festivals such as Fourth of July and Oktoberfest or the smaller events such as the Staring Lake Amphitheatre programs, Winter Wonderland program, Sunbonnet Day, etc. Maximum subsidy levels for these types of programs should be 75 % with a goal to obtain sponsorship of the entire cost of the programs. 1 FEE ASSISTED SERVICES: These services include programs that are slightly subsidized (up to 20%) such as preschool playground and some senior programs, as well as programs with mandated fee levels. These programs provide fees that offset the direct costs of supervisors, instructors, and expendable equipment, but might not cover the entire indirect cost of the program. The goal for these programs is to cover the entire cost of .the program. FEE SUPPORTED SERVICES: These services are provided at no cost to the taxpayers and in many cases show a profit. These programs include the majority of all adult and youth athletic and lesson programs, and outnumber all other programs combined. RECOMMENDATION: . Staff recommend the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission support the adoption of a policy that uses the definition and criteria of the four service levels, and establishes the following program categories and maximum subsidy levels under each service level. The Commission may wish to review an annual report on the actual subsidies of programs under this policy each year to determine if subsidy goals should be revised, programs continued or fees increased or decreased. Note that all of the subsidy maximum levels include 20% above the direct costs for indirect costs charged to the program. BASIC SERVICES -Maximum Subsidy Level 120% Program Categories Adaptive Recreation Programs Integrated Recreation Programs Summer Playground Program Swimming Beaches Outdoor Rinks Teen Work Program Youth Scholarships Arts and History Youth Open Gym Open Skate Open Swim Senior Drop-in Programs Community Band Volunteer Recognition ENHANCED SERVICES -Maximum Subsidy Level 75% 2 Maximum Subsidy 40% 120% 50% 120% 120% 120% 120% 75% 50% 50% 50% 20% 120% 120% Program Categories Community Festivals · 4th of July · Oktoberfest Special Events Promoting Family Activities · Outdoor Center Special Events · Staring Lake Concert Series · Winter Wonderland Special Events Promoting Social Activities · Easter Egg Hunt Historical Site Promotion FEE ASSISTED SERVICES -Maximum Subsidy Level 20% Program Categories Firearm Safety Defensive Driving Programs Preschool Playground Marina Operation Senior Lesson Programs Senior Trips Afterschool Program FEE SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES -No Subsidy Program Categories Adult Open Gym Adult Athletic Leagues Adult Lesson Programs Adult and Youth Trips Youth Lesson Programs* Community Center Programs (not including charge for ice or pool) Kids Korner Outdoor Center Programs Youth Day Camps* Maximum Subsidy 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 75% Maximum Subsidy 20% 20% 15% 20% 20% 20% 20% *Some youth camps and some lesson programs may be subsidized on occasion; however, the overall revenue for these programs will exceed the overall expenditure, including the 20 % administrative fee. . BL:mdd Nov21.rnemo 3 EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 9 Koenig asked abut the shrubs that the developer proposed to plant and if they included arborvitae. Fox responded that those had been replaced with other plantings which were not so inviting to the deer. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Brown seconded, to recommend approval of the Eden Hills Condominium development proposed by Brenwood Development as per the October 20, 1995 Planning Commission staff report, and Staff supplement of 10/31/95. Motion carried unanimously. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Fees Policy (continued from October 2. 1995 Lambert reviewed the proposed fees policy and noted that the concept of breaking down the programs and services into categories helped in arriving at the indirect costs which enabled staff to determine the direct costs. He believed that this recommendation was one that they could support. Bowman inquired how these fees changed from previous recommendations and Lambert responded that they will have to increase fees to get the projects to fit within the guidelines established by the Council. He noted that it may take two or three years to reach that point. Bowman inquired why the subsidy to the preschool programs was set at 15 % and Lambert responded that the City was in direct competition with other agencies for this service, but staff believed it should be available. These fees could be more because there are other resources available. Hilgeman commented that the percentage for Adaptive Recreation seemed to be less than might be needed, and Lambert explained that it was combined with Integrated Recreation programs and they used the figures they were given. Brown inquired if the 20 % overhead costs were included in the percentages and Lambert responded affirmatively. Koenig inquired if efforts were planned to obtain subsidies from the public sector for these programs, and Lambert responded that was the intent. Hilgeman commented she believed it was good public relations for companies to sponsor events and programs for the City. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Brown seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed fee schedule per the Staff memo dated October 24, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. B. Option No. 1. Klein/Peterson Property Lambert reviewed the staff report and after describing the site and the erosion which is occurring, recommended that the Commission schedule a field trip for --l(- EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21195 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO. If.~;L DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Revised Entry to Purgatory Creek Recreation Recreation and Facilities Area Robert A. Lambert ~ In October, City staff presented three concept plans provided by Brauer and Associates for revisions to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry. The Planning Commission, Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, and City Council all made similar recommendations for revisions to the plan, those recommended revisions included the following: 1. Retain the pond configuration in Concept C. 2. Develop a concept that accommodates a restaurant use on this site. 3. Develop a concept that maintains a public entry and allows for development of a public shelter fronting the pond. 4. Maintain the formal walkways and opportunity for flower beds around the pond and along public Walkways. 5. Maintain the strong pedestrian connection to the Southwest Metro parking lot. 6. Provide the spaces for accommodating public art. The revised concept retains all of these recommendations, as well as a plan that will allow the City to subdivide and sell approximately five acres of the seven-acre site sometime in the future. The Council indicated that they were not anxious to sell this property and would be inclined to hold the property until the site is developed and the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area is completed. At that time, they would want to control the user of the site and, therefore, would more than likely market the site for limited uses such as a restaurant or other acceptable use that would complement the entry and meet a public need. Attached to this memo is a reduced scale site plan. Mr. George Watson of Brauer and Associates will be in attendance at the November 6 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, the November 13 Planning Commission meeting and the November 21 Council meeting to answer questions Commission and Council members may have on the revised site plan. RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommend the Commissions and Council approve the revised site plan and that the Council authorizes forwarding this revised site plan to the Watershed District Board of Directors and request their approval of the revised site plan. Upon approved by the Watershed District Board of Directors, the site plan will be incorporated in the permit process to determine mitigation required for this total project. BL:mdd Nov21.memo -/- LAND USE PLANNING AND DESIGN BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD Noverrber 1, 1995 Bob I...arrtJert, Director of Community Services Gty of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitdlell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Re: Purgatory Creek Recreation Area -Enhance Concept Study Brauer and ~ates, Ltd. #95-26 Bob, The enclosed reduced master plan of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area -Entrance Concept Study represents the corrbination of our preliminary Concepts A and·C, and other corrments gathered from our presentations to the Park Board, Planning Commission and Gty Council meetings. The significant elements of Concept A represented in the /Vaster Plan include the use of public art throughout the entry area as visual cues and points of interest for both pedestrians and occupants of vehicles as they pass by the site. From Concept C we have included the formality of the walkWclys and gardens, the private restaurant landuse and the same size and shape formal pond. Unlike Concept C, the /\laster Plan includes a single restaurant of approxirrately 4,600 square feet. The size of the restaurant was detennined by the amount of space available for on-site parking. The single building placed on the south side of the buildable portion of the site, opens the park entry to full view at the intersection of T ed1nology and Prairie Center Drive. The building location also allowed us to include a srrall parking lot for park users. The connection to the transit facility continues to be fonned by landscaping. pedestrian paving and site furnishings and visual focal points. Sincerely, Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry Study Brauer and Associates, Ltd. Gty of Eden Prairie, Minnesota 1 Project #95-26 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Tel (612) 832-9475 Fax (612) 832-9542 -:J- ~ area Section A-A' Scale: 1"-10' \, \ CommerClet Development !sAC -'- Foun,ain"\ Ornamental Railing Casad/ns W3,eriall--l r Wa'e, Foun,,'n -L- ........... _t_oIrfrl_',... ;',::;:':'.:;::': %.. Cot)'. "-t t..r~_ " M1 ""' ~Public walk is directly connected to the nature trail -'. '\''\ ':\ ~ o 50 100 150 ~ SCALE IN FEET Restaurant Pond 1ubliC fubllcIPriYllet Outdoo, Dinlns Walk Buffer' f,\ ~ ~ d II ~ I l • 1r ~ ! Jl~ ]~u ~ ---r t":"-n • • .. Section 6-6' III ~ Scale: 1"-10' .!! .! ... ... • >-.. --." . t~ ... ~;; a. ./ .Ii:: Q. c: ••• . " " cH LU )0,.0 Co.. t ~ 0 "'c: •• >.,. ~-; ~ 11.1&1 0 D \, View 'A' Lookins SouIh T award. Pond , -. ~ I ------------ EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION November 6, 1995 Page 10 a visual inspection of the site prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. He suggested they plan this trip for November 18, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. He was concerned about the extreme erosion on the site and when the property to the north is developed, it will have a direct impact on this property to the south. Discussion ensued regarding the debris which was deposited on the property and cleanup measures which have taken place. Lambert stated that the drainage from the property to the north will have to be controlled. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, Koenig seconded, that a field trip be scheduled on November 18, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. to view the property. Motion carried unanimously. C. Revised Entry to Purgatory Creek Recreation Area George Watson reviewed the changes proposed to the entrance to Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and described the proposed amenities which would be included in this project. Formal gardens and a pavilion will be an eye-catching addition to the City. There will be only one restaurant included in the plan instead of the two originally proposed. Five acres would be sold to accommodate a restaurant and to generate revenue. Hilgeman inquired about action the Commission was requested to take and Lambert responded that the Commission should make a recommendation to the City Council. Watson noted that it was estimated it would be approximately two years before the site would be ready to sell to a developer for the restaurant. MOTION: Koenig moved, Hilgeman seconded, to recommend approval of the revised entry to Purgatory Creek Recreation Area per the November 1, 1995 letter from Brauer & Associates, Ltd. and the October 30, 1995 Staff Report. Motion carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Fees for Shelter Reservation During Winter Months Bob Lanzi reviewed the proposed fee changes for shelter use. Brown inquired if there were Senior Discount Rates implemented for the Starling Lake shelter, and Lanzi responded negatively. Lambert commented that there have never been Senior rates available, nor will there be. ' MOTION: Koenig moved, Kracum seconded, to recommend approval of the shelter fees as set forth in the memorandum dated October 31, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/21195 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO • .AI,e.3 DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Center for the Arts Location Options Recreation and Facilities Robert A. Lambert~ At the November 7 meeting, the City Council directed staff to get creative and provide some recommendations on a location for the Arts Center by the November 21 Council meeting. The following list includes the options regarding a variety of sites and opportunities within the City of Eden Prairie: RILEY JACQUES HOMESTEAD: Although, the Riley Jacques Homestead is "off the beaten path" and would require some renovation of the interior to provide appropriate spaces for display, classes, etc., the facility is owned by the City and would be a site that could be a temporary site for the Arts Board to initiate their programs and presence in the City. Any improvements proposed by the Arts Board would have to be reviewed by the HPC, and would only make sense if the final use of this site is going to be a heritage education program site, so the investment in that facility serves the final purpose of the building or buildings. It should be noted that ADA requirements on historic sites are somewhat more flexible than on other City facilities and water and sewer are located within 300 feet of the Riley Jacques house within Riley Lake Park. This concept will be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission at their November 20 meeting to obtain their reaction to the concept. Staff will share the Commission's reaction with the Council at the November 21 Council meeting. TEMAN PROPERTY: The City owns the Ternan house on Eden Road adjacent to the water tower in Eden Prairie's "downtown." This acre and half site may be an idea1location for a permanent Arts Center and the Ternan horne was constructed to be able to be easily adapted to an office use. Mr. Ternan and his family are still residing at the site and Mr. Ternan does have the right to remove the house from the site when the City gives him notice to abandon the property; therefore, there may be some cost to the Arts Board to acquire the house if this is determined to be an acceptable facility and location. AVAILABLE INDUSTRIAL SITES: Attached to this memo is a memo from Barb Cross, Manager of Facilities, providing is a list of industrial building sites that are available in Eden Prairie, with a range on the cost per square foot for leasing these facilities. 1 Perhaps the best option for the Arts Board is to simply lease office/warehouse space within one of the more centrally located industrial parks. Several of these properties are highly visible from well . travelled streets and would provide easy access with sufficient parking, adequate security, and may meet their needs with little or no site improvements depending on the existing interior space. Staff would recommend that the Board investigate some of these sites to determine actual costs to lease and maintain 2,000 to 3,000 square feet of office/warehouse space. EDEN PRAIRIE CENTER: City staff had very preliminary discussions with representatives from Homart regarding future improvements to the shopping center. One possible consideration would be to develop a Center for the Arts within the shopping center. If this is an acceptable option, staff can continue to pursue this possibility and determine what options are available along that line, as well as lease costs, etc. COMMUNITY SURVEY: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the portion of the community survey that referred to citizen interest regarding and Arts Center. The Council will note approximately 46 % of the residents questioned indicated that they would very likely or somewhat likely..jr,utilize the services of an Arts Center. Of those that would likely utilize a facility, approximately 75 % would attend classes or prograq and over 90 % would attend gallery showings, etc. Seventy-six percent of the residents questioned believed the center should be operated by a private group and not be a service subsidized by the City. Staff need to have some guidelines from the Council as to the amount the City is willing to subsidize the initial development of an Art Center, as well as the annual operating cost, in order to provide more detailed options. BL:mdd ArtOptionlBob2 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Lambert, Director Parks, Recreation & Facilities Department FROM: Barbara Cro~ ./ Manager of Facihties DATE: November 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Staring Lake Art Center Location During our discussion last week I suggested that the Staring Lake Art Center lease office/warehouse space or retail space as an option for their space requirements. I think this is a practical solution for the City and for the Art Center for the following reasons: 1. There will be no up-front capital improvement cost to improve a facility for a program use which is still formulating and untested. 2. Leasing space is a flexible arrangement. Space needs may far exceed what their projections are now, or use and demand may be limited and space needs will not be as great as predicted. 3. Office/warehouse and retail space would be available immediately and would meet the requirements of an art center. • Flexible open spaces with tall ceilings • Adequate ventilation and power for specialized classes • Loading dock and delivery areas • Convenient parking I have investigated some leasing possibilities. Attached are copies from an updated leasing guide showing locations, type of space, space available, rental rates and contacts. I have starred listings where the 3 -4,000 square foot requirements are possibilities. Lease rates for warehouse space is approximately $4 per square foot. Lease rates for office area is approximately $8 per square foot. Retail spaces have also been identified and although slightly more expensive, the image and visibility may be more in keeping with the Art Center goal. BC:pb artctrec -3 - MAIIlD Building lIam. , ..Y.t..BuII1 I. Yr.RcoIIJI. 'h Sq Fl AyaUable Q:~; l~~~:~::~~~~~;;i~~~~~)A::;:~:~~~:~~;~i~~~~i~;~ fnHI.u.Gt ", AddwI.. ~.·"~,;i~~li~~t~~;~~~I}~~~~bl.~ ~~~. ~~f, ~:~:I; ~~c~ l¥I!J.·,t ~ .. ,.> 21C-2 Heitman Centre/Chanhassen lks I 0 3.75 14' Michael Smith Heitman MN Mgml. Inc 1351 Park Road 19831 0 OS 7.25 Chanhassen 50,868 0 14' 6121338-82771939-9789 21C-2 Heitman Centre/Chanhassen Lks II 6,090 3.75 14' Michael Smith Heitman MN Mgml. Inc. 1270 Park Road 19861 6.090 7.25 OS Chanhassen 56,777 6,090 12' 6121338-82771939-9789 210-2 Aeration Industries 77,854 4.00 Kit Richardson Griffin Real Estate Co. 4100 Peavey Road 19881 77,854 8.00 Brad Schafer OW Chaska 77,854 77,854 18' 6121893-6800 210-2 Chaska Business Center 0 4.00 David Kordonowy OW 331 82nd Avenue NE 0 8.00 Joe Smith Steiner Development Inc. Chaska 69,500 0 6121473-5650 210-1 Rlchllnd Metal Building 4.00 14' Sen Merriman 4155 Peavey Road 19941 8.00 8MB Realty Investment OW Chaska 50,000 12' 6121942-0740 21C-4 6968 Shady Oak Road 0 3 18 Tom Lelich 6968 Shady Oak Road 0 CB Commercial OW 6.5 Eden Prairie 60,000 0 18 6121924-4600 21C-4 Bryant Lake Business Center 1,11,111 4.50 16' Bill Ritter 11403-14 Valley View Road 19851 8.50 Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies OS Eden Prairie 171,632 14' 6121897-7700 -+ 21C-3 Carlson Parkway Business Center 6,794 375 18' Jay Mutschler 6520 Edenvale Boulevard 19881 7.00 J.G.M. Agency Inc. OW Eden Prairie 53,291' 18' 6121884-8088 21C-4 City West Business Center 4.25 14' Jim leary 19841 CB Commercial OS 6541 City West Parkway 8.50 Tom lelich Eden Prairie 50,000 12' 6121924-4600 21B-4 City West Business Cenler II 5,950 4.25 14' Becky Cederstrom 6647 Shady Oak Road 19841 5,950 8.5 The Ac'cent Companies OS Eden Prairie 90,837 5,950 12' 6121943-7000 21C-3 City West Business Park (Bldg. B) 4.25 14' Tom lelich 6577 City West Parkway 19841 CB Commercial OS 85 12' Eden Prairie 83,189 6121924-4600 21C-4 Creekedge Business Center 10,256 450 Scott Frederiksen I 7255 Flying Cloud Drive 19861 10,256 9 16 Welsh Companies OS Eden Prairie 76,756 5,925 14 6121897-7739 "'i' 21C-4 CROWN PLASTICS 30.138 3.75 Scott Frederiksen 9837 691h Slreel Wesl 19801 30,138 7.75 20' Welsh Companies OW Eden Prairie 60,000 0 18' 6121897-7739 21C-3 Department 56 0 Peggy Schalz 9901 74th Slreol Wesl 0 First Industrial Realty Trusl. Inc. Eden Prairie 150,000 0 6121943-2700 ~ 21C-4 East Eden I 6.688 3.75 Joe Smith 7400 Washington Avenue 19741 6,688 7.50 18' David Kordonowy Steiner Development Inc. OW Eden Prairie 71,830 3,100 8' 6121473-5650 21C-3 Ea.l Eden II 0 3.75 Joe Smith 7472 Washington Ave. S. 19741 0 7.50 8' Steiner Development Inc. Eden Prairie 71,730 0 18' 6121861-2729 '*-21B-4 Eden Park Business Center 4,579 Scott Frederiksen 7630-7674 Washington Avenue S. 1980 I 4,579 14'-18' Welsh Companies OW Eden Prairie 73,836 3,834 14'-18' 6121897-7739 21C-3 Eden Pointe 4.50 John Thompson 7400 Flying Cloud Drive 19871 16' Madison/Marquette OS 9.00 Chuck Howard Eden Prairie 32,127 14' 6121481-8070 21B-4 Eden Square 700 3.50 Todd McGinley 6820-6848 Washington Avenue S. 19791 16' Wetsh Companies OS 7.50 Eden Pralo" 40,000 12' 6121897-7700 :~ 21C-4 Edenvale Executive Center -Bldg. A 3,697 4.50 Todd McKinley 7600-7690 Executive Drive 19881 3,697 9.00 16' Welsh Companies OS Eden Prairie 172,000 3,697 14' 6121897-7700 21C-2 Edenvale Executive Center Bldg_ B 4,579 4.00 7652 Executive Drive 0 8.00 Welsh Companies Eden Prairie 111,245 0 14' 6121897-7734 21C-3 Edenvale I 4 16' Mark Koisrud 6550-6572 Edenvale Boulevard 19881 8.00 Rick Ducharme Towle Real Estate Company OS Eden Prairie 39,925 16' 6121347-9373 -* 21C-3 Edenvale II 3,770 4.00 16' Mark Kolsrud 6585-6595 Edenvale Boulevard 19891 3,770 8.00 Rk:k Ducharme Towle Real Estale Company OS Eden Prairie 59,249 3,770 16' 6121347-9373 21B-4 Edenwoods Business Center I & III 1985-11 42,000 4.50 12' Joe Smith OS 10200-10250 Valley View Road l67,000 42,000 8.75 David Kordonowy Steiner Developmenllnc. Eden Prairie 20,000 8.75 12' 6121473-5650 21C-4 Flying Cloud Business Center 0 3.5 14' Scoll Frederiksen OS 6811 Flying Cloud Drive 0 6.5 Welsh Companies Eden Prairie 34,500 0 14' 6121897-7739 Page 56 Minnesota Real Estate Journal -Leasing 9uide November 1995 1995 I ... ,.V\lV 149,850 7,000 18 21,640 4.00 18' Michael Smith Heitman MN Mgmt. Inc. . 19851 21,640 8.00 6121338-82771939-97~9 301,228 21,640 14' 0 4.50 16' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 1985 I 0 9 6121897-7739 75,000 0 14' 63,000 4.50 21' G.T.Morl< Towle Real Estate Company 19861 63,000 9.50 612/347-9352 63,000 63,000 9.50 18' 6,622 450 16' Rebecca Cederstrom The Ac'cent Companies 1987 , 4,622 8.50 6121896-1101 45,675 2,000 6.50 14' 0 3.50 22' Fred Hedberg Welsh Companies 0 5.50 20' 6121897-7700 30,000 0 0 3.5 18' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 19801 0 7 6121897-7739 35,000 0 18' 0 3.50 14' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 19841 0 1.50 5121897-7739 40,628 0 12' Perkin Elmer 25,200 Jon Yanla KOLL 6509 Flying Cloud Drive 9.00 14 6121943-7000 Eden Prairie 212,000 6.00 , 21C-3 Physical Electronics 25,200 12' Craig Patterson KOLL 6509 Flying Cloud Drive 19851 25,200 9.00 Jon Yanla OS 205,000 8' Jason Meyer 6121943-7000 lIj Eden Prairie 6.00 2IC-4 Plows Building G.T, Mork Towfe Real Estate Company j 198011988 24' RW 5775 Shady Oak Rd 55,000 24' 6121347-9352 Eden Prairie Pondvlew Business Center 18,000 16' SooU Frederiksen Welsh Companies 7011 Shady Oak Road 1985 I 18,000 6121897-7739 Eden Prairie 32,222 14' Prairie Square North 1,834 3.25 19' Peg9Y Schatz First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc, 10175 Crosstown Circle 19781 1,834 6.35 6121943-2700 Eden Prairie 31,900 0 17' Pralrlevlew Business Center 0 3.50 16' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 9910-9950 14th Sireel Wesl 1982 I 0 7.5 6121897-7739 Eden Prairie 63,905 0 14' Rietz Building 0 3.25 21' Jerry Driessen CB Commercial 6970-1000 Shady Oak Road 1981 I 0 6.50 5121924-4600 Eden Prairie 60,110 0 19' Shady Oak Building (UPS) 0 3.75 20' Tom lelich CB CommerCial 9955 69th Sireel West 1979 I 0 7.75 Jim leary 6121924-4500 Eden Prairie 60,000 0 18' Shady Oak IndUstrial 0 3.5 22' Fred Hedberg Welsh Companies Shady Oak Road 1981 I 0 7.5 6121897-1700 Eden Prairie 139,190 0 20' Shady Oak IndUstrial II 0 8' Paul Bickford Welsh Companies 6801-6813 Shady Oak Road 1981 I 0 612/897-1732 Eden Prairie 104,243 0 Shady View 11 0 3.00 16' Jon Yanla KOLL 1100-7148 Shady Oak Road 19831 0 6.00 6121943-1000 Eden Prairie 122,000 0 14' Southwelt Crosllng Tech Center I & IV I 4,832 4.5 14' Fred Hedberg Welsh Companies 10100-0340 Viking Drive 1986 4,832 9.5 12' 6121891-1700 Eden Prairie 107,505 4,832 Tech V & VI 12,742 Peggy Schatz First Industrial Really Trust, Inc. 7615~7625 Golden Triangle Orive 5,804 6121943-2700 Eden Prairie 125,945 5,804 Technology Park I & 11 0 4.00 16' Jon Vania KOLL 9500-9700 161h Sireet wa., 19851 0 8.00 Craig Pallerson 6121943-7000 Eden Prairie 182,551 0 14' Technology Park IV 0 4.00 16' Peggy Schatz First Indus.rial Realty Trust. Inc. 10120 78th Street Welt 19811 0 8.00 6121943-2700 EdenPJ_ 58,844 0 14' ~';i¥=:l~~;~:~;~;,;~~i~t~;~~f~,~;~~;~.~;J ~~~::I~:G~: ,,?g:J~~ :::;~:~}¥~~¥{it~.~i;i~~~~J;\\r.4ii~t~~~t'~;;,~~>~~R_ii~:~i,l- 21B-4 Technology Park VIII 19901 0 4.25 14' Peggy Schatz First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 7600-7644 Golden Triangle Drive 0 8.50 OS Eden Prairie 88,014 14' 6121943-2700 21C-4 Valley Oaks Business Center 0 16' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 7115-7173 Shady Oak Road 19831 0 Fred Hedberg OS Eden Prairie 77,797 14' 6121897-7739 2/C-4 Valley Square North 19801 2.400 3.50 16' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 7202-7240 Washington Avenue 2,400 7.50 OS Eden Prairie 31,800 2,400 14' 612/897-7739 2/C-4 Valley View Business Center I 1979-ij 0 3.50 13' Bill Wardwell United Properties OW 9701-9727 Valley View Road D.32,500 0 7.00 Eden Prairie 13' 612/831-1000 2/B-4 Valley View Business Center II 6,450 3.50 15' Bill Wardwell United Properties 9801-9827 Valley View Road 19801 7.00 OW 13' 6121831-1000 Eden PralrM! 35,000 4.50 2/C-4 Washington Square NorthlSouth 19741 3.75 18' Jon Yanta KOll 7500 -7588 Washington Avenue S. 7.75 Craig Patterson OW Eden Prairie 80,000 16' 6121943-7000 2/C-3 West Five Business Center 19891 7,200 16' lauri lundquist William F. Smith Co. 7887 Fuller Road 3,600 OS Eden Prairie 37,000 1,800 14' 6121929-8825 21C-3 Westach Business Center 12,314 4.50 16' Jon Yanta KOll 15151-5155 Technology Drive 19861 8.75 OS Eden Prairie 54,000 14' 6121943-7000 21B-3 Westwood Business Park 0 4.00 18' Ron Manning The Ac'cent Companies 6200 Bury Drive 19891 0 8.00 OS Eden Prairie 52,000 0 18' 6121896-1101 21B-4 Westwood II 0 5.00 Rex Rice Rice Associates OS 6201 Bury Drive 0 9.00 Susan Bill Eden Prairie 50,020 0 6121937-8977 2IB-4 Westwood III 2,646 5.00 Rex Rice Rice Associates OS 6255 Bury Drive 2,646 9.00 Susan 8i11 Eden Prairie 51,901 2,646 6121937-8977 21B-4 Westwood IV Business Center 4.50 18' Peter Mark CB Commercial 6321-6325 Bury Drive 1988 I 8.75 OS Eden Prairie 73,122 16' 612/924-4600 21C-4 5221 Edina Industrial Blvd. 0 400 16 Mark Sims United Properties , 5221 Edina Induslrial Blvd. I 0 8.00 Edina 38,196 14 6121831-1000 ~ 121B -5 5250 Building 19731 903 4.00 12 Russ Crawford Zeller Really OW 5250 74th Street West 7.00 Edina 64,000 0 12 612/844-2519 2/C-4 7375 Bush Lake Road 42,000 16 Mark Sims United Properties 7375 Bush lake Road Edina 42,000 14 6121831-1000 2/C-4 7385-7399 Bush Lake Road 0 325 16' Pamela lohman Copperwood Investments OW 7385-7399 Bush Lake Road 0 6.50 Edina 30,600 0 16' 6121593-2730 2/C-4 7400 Bush Lake Road 0 3.50 20' John Ungerman The Ackerberg Group 7400 Bush lake Road 1970 I 0 3.5 BW Edina 103,828 0 20' 6121924-6423 2/C-4 7625 Cahill Road 0 3.50 21' Scoll Frederiksen Welsh Companies 7625 Cahill Road 1969 I 1986 0 OW 7.50 Edina 32,449 19' 6121897-7735 21C-4 Braemar Cecilia 6,275 5.50 12'-16' Matt Carpenter Carpenter land Company 5583-5599 78th Street Wesl 19841 7.50 Edina 32,222 12'-14' 6121944-7596 21B-4 Braemarll 2,333 3.35 18' Peggy Sch.atz Firsllndustrial Realty Trusl, Inc. 6955-6973 Washington Avenue S. 19721 2,333 635 OW Edina 30,552 2,333 18' 612194]-2700 2/B-4 Braemarlll 0 350 18' Peggy Schatz First Industrial Realty Trusl, Inc. 6925·6953 Washington Avenue S. 19721 0 6.35 OW Edina 39,670 0 18' 6121943-2700 2IB-4 Business Incentives Building 11,410 3.50 16' Scott Moe United Properttes 7601-7625 Bush lake Road I 11,410 7.50 Mark Sims OS Edina 52,000 14' 6121891-1000 21C-4 Calslar Building 19801 0 3.50 18' Scott Frederiksen Welsh Companies 7401 Cahill Road 0 650 OW Edina 45,800 0 18' 6121897-7737 21C-4 Creekside Court I & It 12,000 4.00 16' Paul Bickford Welsh Companies 5221 73rd Street West 19791 12,000 800 Fred Hedberg OW Edina 82,640 14' 6121897-7700 2IC-5 Creekvlew Buslnes. Center 0 6.50 14' Fred Hedberg Welsh Companies 710t-7t 17 Ohms La", 1981 I 0 OS 6.50 Edina 42,672 0 81218~7:7!1!O, •• _._--------------------------------------------.----------- I ~ MMJI1 Center Name Ylm.t.IMIl fp.Il<m1..O~~ ~ ~ AglUlJ<Y. kiln 2/E-5 N 2/E-5 N 21C-3 N ~ ~C-3 AlI!!wL G.l.A I21a..J.Qp.!!r...E.!m... .fb.!mg .Qll ~ Asking !:!Igbl!.ow Burnside Plaza 1978 97.4% Frank's Nursery, Vescio's, Steve Dombrovski Sunlide Realty Services, Inc. 14304 Burnhaven Drive 98,671 $2.79 Circus Pizza, Northwesl Fabrics Burnsville 2,600 1$10.00 612/333-3962 Burnsville Crossings 1989 84.7% Lyndale Garden Clr, T. C. Thomas Palmquisl Sunlide Realty Services, Inc. 1-35E & Counly Road 42 75,095 $4.95 Pels, Narwesl Financial, CiaUi's Burnsville 11,480 $12.00 1$9.00 612/333-3962 Burnsville Marketplace 1991 100.0% F&M Dislrib., Marshalls, Toys Dan Ross Ross Company, Inc. Cly Rd 42 & Aldrich Avenue 260,140 $5.09 'R' Us, Kids 'R' Us, Barnes & Shelly Muelken Burnsville 0 Noble, Office Max, Circuil Cily 612/639-0821 Byerly's Burnsville Centre 1988 97.8% Byerly's, Snyder Drug Thomas Palmquist Ryan Companies Portland Avenue S. & Counly Road 42 74,516 $5.68 Burnsville 1,674 $16.00 1$16.00 612/337-3382 Cobblestone Court 1980 99.6% T.J. Maxx, Old Counlry Buffel, Tim Bloom CB Commercial 14150 Nicollel Avenue Soulh 100,000 $4.15 Sun Valley Walerbeds Burnsville 450 $10.00 I $7.50 612/924-4600 DiamondHead Mall 1974 74.0% School Dislriel 191, Counlry Russ McGinly Griffin Companies 200 W. Burnsville Pkwy, 134,528 $2.92 Siore, Bloomquisl Hardware, Burnsville 35,000 $5.00 I $3.87 Heartleaf 612/896-3787 Valley Ridge 1977 38.7% Kraus-Anderson Insurance, Barbara VanAuken Kraus-Anderson Realty W Burnsville Parkway & Highway 5 88,595 $2.11 Hagen Antique Furnilure. Tire Burnsville 54,289 Plus University 612/332-1241 Market Square 1992 100.0% Festival Foods, Ace Hardware, Vernelle Claylon Lolus Realty Wesl 781h Slreel & Markel Blvd. 88,000 $4.48 Cenler Drug Brad Johnson Chanhassen 0 612/934-4538 For more information about the above properties please refer to our Property Tracking Service, For more information call 612-885-0815, Brickyard Shopping Center 1986 100.0% Snyder Drug, Bumper 10 Bumper Bruce Lundgren Securily Development Co. 800 Yellow Brick Road 48,000 $3.94 Aulo Parts Chaska 0 1$12.00 612/941-0660 Lund. Center 1988 100.0% Lund's Russ McGinly Grim" Companies Prairie Center Drive 57,800 $6.36 Eden Prairie 0 $14.001 612/896-3787 Menard Plaza -Eden Prairie 1984 100.0% Menards Pal Flynn Menard Inc. 1-494 & Hwy 5 93,060 $3.18 Eden Prairie 0 $9.00 1$7,00 715/876-2224 Prairie Village Mall 1976 95.9% Minnesola Fabrics, Snyder Tomlmmen Northco Corporalion Hwy 5 & Counly Rd. 4 75,736 $4.95 Drug, Driskell New Markel Kim Vazquez Eden Prairie 3,075 1$9.00 612/332-2212 Pralrlevlew Shopping Center 1986 100.0% Rainbow Foods, Snyder Bros. Terese Reiling Welsh Companies 928-970 Prairie Cenler Drive 114,852 $5.96 Drug, SI. Paul Book & Stal., Eden Prairie 0 $14,001 $14.00 Bakers Square 612/897-7755 Preserve Village 1980 100.0% Jerry's New Markel, Supplee's Wendy Madsen Ryan Companies 9611-9613 Anderson Lake Parkway 78,330 7-Hi Eden Prairie 0 612/336-9778 Shady Oak Center 1986 100.0% Pepper's Grill, Tuesday Jennifer Hebble Welsh Companies 6399 -6411 Cily Wesl Parkway 57,408 $4.93 Morning. Mama D's Eden Prairie 0 $9.001 Prinl Ovalion 612/829-3408 Tower Square 1989 93.8% Firsl Nalional Bank Wayzala, Russ McGinly Griffin Companies 582 Prairie Cenler Drive 62,681 $6.46 Pannekoeken, Shinders, Eden Prairie 3,900 1$14.00 McDonalds, Paper Warehouse 612/896-3787 Brandon Square 1970s 85.6% Scandia Inleriors, P.S. Plus Paul Bozonie Tyco}1 Companies, Inc. 70th Sireel & F ranee Avenue Soulh 48,213 $5.39 Sizes, CG Rein Galleries Edina 6,957 1$15.50 612/379-7000 Centennial Lakes Plaza 1990 100.0% F&M, Kids 'R' Us, Office Max, Sieve Dombrovski Sunlide Really Services, Inc. 7501 France Avenue Soulh 197,012 $6.51 Compuler City Edina 0 Supercenler,McDonalds 612/333-3962 Edina Properties 1942 99.1% Clancy's, Lund's, Talbot's, John Breilinger Uniled PropertieslJackson 50th & France Avenue 131,393 $8.00 Dana's Scoll-Relail Edina 1,185 612/591·5018 Galleria 1973 96.2% GAbbert's Fumilurp., nam .. s & Marlys Cnnter Badlln O"bhert & Beck 'tIt!4n "'_11_-1_ ~ ... CO ... h-.l11 l.l .... ~_ 1"'_ ..... -.. 135. 1.36. 612-929-6166 DECISION RESOURCES 187 PiS OCT 113 '95 IF • INADEQUATE,· ASK: 134. Why do you feel that way? (N=74) DON'T KNOW, lOt; DON'T LISTEN, ~ 14%; DON'T COMMUNICATE PLANS, 32%; NEED INFO~TION, OVERBUILT, 8t. How much of a priority do you think local efforts to protect the area environment should be the most important above every- thing, a high priority, a moderate priority, a low priority, or no priority at all? In general, do you think the City is doing too much, too little, or about the right amount in protect- ing the environment? MOST IMPORTANT .•.•..•. 10t HIGH •••••••••••••••••• sst - MODERATE •••••......... 31t LOW •••••••••••••••••••• 3% NO PRIORITY ....•...•••• O% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED •.•.• 1% TOO MUCH ••••••••••••••• 8% TOO LITTLE ••.......••. 1S% ABOUT RIGHT AMOUNT .... 72t DON'T KNOW/RBFUSED ..... 6% Let's talk about future land use in Eden Prairie. I would like to read you a short list of types of developments. For each one, please tell me if you feel the city has enough, too many, or too little .... ENO MNY LTL DKR 131. Quality dining restaurants? 44% 3% ® 1.% 1.38. Whole family entertainment offerings? gifS 3% 33% 4% 1.39. Retail shopping? 8t 21% 1% 140. Low and moderate ipcome ~ housing? 6% 38t 13% 141. Upper income housing? 41% 3t <rlb 1.42. Senior citizen housing? d& 1t 34% 143. Parks and open space? 9% 15% 1% 144. Businesses offering youth C!ID activities and services? 3% 28% 22% The City is considering support for the development of a Center for the Arts by a non-prOfit group, including" the possibility of allowing it to operate in a city-owned property. The facility could house an art gallery, offer classes, host cultural events, "and possibly contain an art gift shop. 145. How likely would you or members of your househOld be to use the ser- vices offered by a Center for the Arts --very likely, somewhat likely I not too likely, or not "at all likely? VERY LIKELY ........... 19% SOMEWHAT LIKELy ......•• 21% NOT TOO LIKELY .•...•.. 29% NOT AT ALL LlKELY ..... 23t DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 2t \.y IF "VERY LIKELY" OR "SOMEWHAT LIKELY," ASK: 14 -r- 612-929-6166 DECISION RESOURCES lUi '20 C02 I would like to read you a short list of services that may be available in the Center for the Arts. Por each one, please tell me if you or members of your household would be likely to use it. (N=18S) 146. Art Gift Shop? 147. Studio Art Classes, in such areas as painting, sculpture, or photography? 148. Art Gallery, to view art displays and exhibits? 149. Events, such as recitals and poetry readings? YES C§) CliV @) 49% NO 24% 21% 8% ® DKR It 1% 1% 1t The City Council supports the concept for a Center for the Arts. However, it has not yet determined if it is appropriate to pro- vide any subsidy. As a stated policy .... 150. Should the Center for the Arts be PRIVATE OPERATION ..... 74% -. - considered a private operation, or COMMUNITY SERVICE .•... 19% a community service which could be DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 7% subsidized by the City? .. '---------------Turning to parks and recreational opportunities .... 151. In general, how well informed are you about the Eden Prairie park system and facilities. Would you say you are very well informed, somewhat informed, not too well informed, or not at all informed? 152. How would you rate park and re- creational facilities in Eden Prairie --excellent, good, only fair, or poor? IF RATlNG IS GIVEN, ASK: VERY WELL INPORMED .... 2a% SOMEWHAT INFORMED ••••• 61% - NOT TOO WELL INFORMED.17t NOT AT ALL INFORMED .... 2% DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 1% EXCELLENT .••...•...... 43t GOOD •.......•.....••.. 52% ONLY FAIR............ .. 3 % POOR .•..•.......••..... at DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 2% 153.. Why do you feel that way? (N=393) ~T KNOW, 4%; LOTS TO DO, 33%; WELL ~INTAlNED, l' GOOD TRAILS, 2%; COULD IMPROVE. 3%; HEARSAY, ; NEED M:>RE PARKS, 5%; CONVENIENT, 2t. The Eden Prairie Park System is composed of smaller neighborhood parks designed to serve residents within a one-half mile radius, and larger community parks containing ballfields, picniC· areas, beaches, and other offerings. Other community facilities include the Outdoor Center, the Community Center with an ice arena and swimming pool, and Flying,Cloud ballfields, swimming beaches, and 15 -9-