Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/07/1995AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7,1995 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 8:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorf"mnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra- Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM m. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. OCTOBER 17. 1995 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD ADDITION Acceptance of formal withdrawal of Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition by 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation C. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION, located West of Baker Road and South of Theresa Place D. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF AZTEC DRIVE ADDITION, located along the East Side of TH 169/212 E. AUTHORIZE MAYOR & CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE NEGOTIATIONS AND EXECUTE DOCUMENTS FOR SALE OF PROPERTY TO MEDIA PLAY F. RESOLUTION APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FOR SCHLAMPP'S WALNUT RIDGE City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 7, 1995 Page Two G. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONCURRENCE OF CSAH 18 DESIGNATION. I.C. 52-175 H. APPROVE SupPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.2 FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TO TKDA FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE WELL HOUSE AND WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION. I.C. 94-5356 and I.C. 94-5357 I. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY/PRESERVE BOULEVARD. I.C. 94-5349 J. 1ST AND 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR STREET NAME CHANGE FROM FOSSIL ROAD TO BOULDER POINTE ROAD K. 1ST AND 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR STREET NAME CHANGE FOR A PORTION OF CITY WEST PARKWAY TO OLD SHADY OAK ROAD L. RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES WITHIN PAFKO 2ND ADDITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. I.C. 96-5396 M. REOUEST BY MARSHALL'S FOR A LAND ALTERATION PERMIT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PIONEER TRAIL & COUNTY ROAD ~ V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. V ALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE U by Design I of Edina. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres and Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres for a 6,400 sq. ft. office building. Location: 9973 Valley View Road (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District) B. VACATION 95-08 Part of Drainage and Utility easements in Woodland Ponds of Eden Prairie (Resolution) C. 1995 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING (Resolution) -Continued from October 17, 1995 VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VU. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 7, 1995 Page Three vm. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. SENIOR ISSUES TASK FORCE -2nd Quarterly Report X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTSOFCOUNCaMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Family Services Collaborative Proposal C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & FACaITIES 1. Art Center Lease Agreement D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Resolution for Participation Under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XU. OTHER BUSINESS xm. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17,1995 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber, 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Ronald Case, Patricia Pidcock, Ross Thorf"mnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra- Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. All members were present. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added item XI.A.!. UPDATE ON BUS STRIKE. Jullie added Consent Calendar item IV. G. APPROVE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MEDIA PLAY FOR SALE OF DOWNTOWN PARCEL TO PROVIDE A TWO-WEEK EXTENSION OF THE PURCHASE DEADLINE. Dietz added item XI.E.l. REPORT ON HENNEPIN COUNTY SOLID WASTE FEE. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. PRESENTATION OF "AWARD OF EXCELLENCE" TO THE PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT'S ADAPTIVE RECREATION LEARNING EXCHANGE PROGRAM, "LEISURE DISCOVERIES", FROM THE MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKS ASSOCIATION Marcie Padgett, Chairperson of the Minnesota Recreation & Parks Association Awards Committee presented the "Award of Excellence" to the City's Parks, Recreation & Facilities Department in recognition of the Adaptive Recreation Learning Exchange Program, "Leisure Discoveries." Ms Padgett showed a video taken at the Leisure Discoveries days. Mayor Harris thanked Ms Padget and the Awards Committee and commended Tria Vikesland for her work that helped us get the award. II. OPEN PODIUM m. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. OCTOBER 3. 1995 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 2 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, October 3, 1995 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. RESOLUTION 95-183 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF LOOSEN ADDITION (located south of Hi&hwa.y 62 and west of Shady Oak Road) C. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.2 FOR WELL HOUSES 11 AND 12, I.C. 94-5356 D. ABRA AUTO BODY 2nd Reading of Ordinance 33-95 for Rezoning from 1-2 to Community Commercial on 1.1 acres, Adoption of Resolution 95-184 for Site Plan Review and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Abra Auto Body located northeast comer of Hwy. 169 and Aztec Drive. (Ordinance 33-95 for Rezoning from 1-2 to Community Commercial and Resolution 95-184 for Site Plan Review) E. AMOCO CAR W ASH 2nd Reading of Ordinance 34-95 for Zoning District Amendment within the C-Hwy Zoning District on 0.9 acres, Adoption of Resolution 05-185 for Site Plan Review and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Amoco Car Wash located at 8100 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance 34-95 for Zoning District Amendment and Resolution 95-185 for Site Plan Review) F. APPROVAL OF BIDS FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT COMMUNITY CENTER G. APPROVE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MEDIA PLAY FOR SALE OF DOWNTOWN PARCEL TO PROVIDE A TWO-WEEK EXTENSION OF THE PURCHASE DEADLINE MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve items A -G of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. 1995 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING (Resolution 95-186) City Manager Jullie said the official notice for this Public Hearing was published on September 28, 1995 in the Eden Prairie News, and also was mailed to all owners of record of the properties proposed to be assessed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 3 City Engineer Alan Gray reviewed the final costs for the project and the proposed assessment rates for the seven improvement contract projects to be assessed. 1. I.C. 52-067 Gray said they have received a letter from the Pavelka's stating that they object to the assessment and wish to preserve their right to appeal. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close the Public Hearing and to approve I.C. 52-067. Pidcock withdrew the motion with the consent of Tyra-Lukens. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close discussion ofI.C. 52-067 and to approve I.C. 52-067. Motion carried unanimously. 2. I.C. 93-5312 Gray said this is a complicated project that is based on an assessment agreement with the developers of Bea.rpath and Dell Estates and by 100% petition from the Big Woods parcels. He said they have received a letter from Bea.rpath requesting a continuance of this hearing. Dr. Robert Wetmore, 9054 Belvedere Drive, said he objects to the project and presented his written objection to the assessment. He said no information was given to him that a special assessment would be presented on this subdivision. Gray said the funds should have been escrowed from the closing and the developer would then make the payment. Dr. Wetmore said he did not have an escrow set aside at the time of closing. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close discussion of I.C. 93-5312. Case withdrew the motion with the consent of Thorfinnson. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to continue I.C. 93-5312 to the next Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 3. I.C. 93-5341 Gray said this project is based on a feasibility study and previous public hearings. There were no comments from the audience. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 4 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfmnson, to close discussion on I.C. 93-5341 and to approve I.C. 93-5341. Motion carried unanimously. 4. I.C. 94-5345 Gray said this project is based on an assessment agreement with Centex. Pidcock asked why this project is at 8 % rather than 7.5 % like the others. Gray said the current rate is 8 %, and 7.5 % is by prior agreement. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close discussion on I.C. 94-5345 and to approve I.C. 94-5345. Motion carried unanimously •. 5. I.C. 94-5360 Gray said this is an assessment for street improvements with an assessment for sewer and water to occur in five years. He said they are proposing a credit to the four homes that are getting a different level of service. Mark Zierden, 6622 Golden Ridge Drive, said the project looks very nice; however, he questioned why the proposed credit has changed from $3,000 at the previous Public Hearing to $2,685 tonight. Gray explained that the proposed credit would lower the assessment for sanitary sewer for these four homes. A pump system may cost more than the credit proposed, but could be purchased and installed for about $3000. Any further credit would require a reduction in the assessment for water service. The City agreed to credit the four homes because the City benefited from the design through lower costs to construct the utilities and through lower restoration costs. John Dean, 6642 Golden Ridge Drive, said he thought each of the four homes may have different costs because of where their property lies. He said he has the longest run, and he is objecting to the credit allowed because it is going against what the Council said they would cover at the previous hearing. He said he wants to have a quality system and asked if he needs to submit a letter in addition to speaking at the meeting. Gray said that the actual assessment for sewer and water would not occur for five years or until connection. and Mr. Dean would need to file at that time. Roger Windfeldt, 6621 Golden Ridge Drive, said they made a compromise to save the City money. He distributed a letter that showed the initial cost estimate was about $2500 for the pump system. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 5 Dean asked why the Dudycha house was not included in this assessment. Gray said the Dudycha's received sewer and water with the Rowland Road project and their property has been assessed to the full extent. Harris asked if we are assessing only for the streets at this time. Gray said that was true. Tyra-Lukens asked if the homeowners are responsible for the maintenance of the pumps. Gray said they are. Tyra-Lukens said she recalled the reason the City decided to go shallower was because the neighbors wanted to save the trees along the street. She thought we should review the $2685 to see if there should be an adjustment. Dietz noted that they will be excluded for sanitary sewer and water main improvements for five years unless the property owner elects to connect. Case said he would like some more information on the options and on Mr. Dean's argument regarding adjustments per the length of pipe. Thorfinnson said he thought we should be able to compromise and work with the residents on this. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close discussion on I.C. 94-5360 and to adopt I.C. 94-5360. Motion carried unanimously. 6. I.C. 94-5368 Gray said this assessment is based on a settlement agreement with Interstate Diesel. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close discussion on I.C. 94-5368 and to adopt I.C. 94-5368. Motion carried unanimously. 7. I. C. 94-5388 Gray said this is an assessment agreement between Mr. Pufahl and the City for demolition of an existing home. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close discussion on I.C. 94-5388 and to adopt I.C. 94-5388. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Supplementals Gray reviewed the proposed supplementals. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 6 There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to close discussion on the Supplementals and to approve the Supplementals as presented. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution 95-186 approving the 1995 Special Assessment Rolls as presented, with the exception of I.C. 93-5312 which will be continued to the November 7, 1995, meeting. Motion carried unanimously. B. DELL ROAD AND HIGHWAY 5 COMMERCIAL CENTER by Tandem Development and Kindercare Request for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on 4.47 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.47 acres, Preliminary Plat of 4.47 acres into 2 lots, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 4.47 acres, and Planned Unit Development District Review on 4.47 acres. Location: Dell Road and Highway 5. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial and Planned Unit Development District Review, Resolution 95-187 for Preliminary Plat and Resolution 95-188 for PUD Concept Review) Dick Putnam, representing Tandem Properties, reviewed the project and the history of development in the surrounding area. He noted that the project has been revised several times in response to neighborhood concerns and recommendations from the Planning Commission. Erik Johnson, representing RLK Associates, reviewed the landscape and screening proposed for the project. Assistant City Manager Enger said this project was reviewed at the Planning Commission meetings on July 10, August 14, September 11 and September 25, 1995. At the September 25th meeting a motion to approve the development as submitted failed on a 2-4 vote. Enger reviewed the recommendations of the Staff Report of September 22, 1995, the proceedings at the four Planning Commission meetings, and the responses by the developer to the recommendations given at the four meetings. Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities Lambert said the Parks Commission reviewed the proposal at their October 2, 1995 meeting and recommended approval on a unanimous vote, subject to the recommendations of the September 22, 1995, Staff Report, and with additional recommendations to fence all natural areas proposed for preservation prior to development, to review the sidewalk behind the building, and to line up the sidewalk on the island with the trail along Dell Road. Case asked if Staff was comfortable with the storm water runoff for the project. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 7 Gray said the area immediately downstream from the proposed project consisted of ponds excavated in wetland areas. These excavated ponds are in the rear yards of residential lots. The property owners adjacent to these ponds are likely to be concerned with their water quality. The developer has proposed the project without storm water treatment on the basis that to provide the area for treatment would be a hardship to the project. Richard Koehler, 7846 Donegal Cove, said the neighborhood wishes should be considered when dealing with a neighborhood center such as this. There is a neighborhood petition that opposes the proposal, and the neighborhood would prefer an office building in this location because the area is very residential. He said they are concerned about the tree loss, increased noise in the nearby townhomes, and the public safety issue that will result from a commercial area accessing off a residential street. Cascade Drive is not considered a commercial street and is not wide enough to accommodate the proposed traffic for the proposal, especially when cars park along Cascade next to the townhomes. He said they do not need commercial in this area, and the original PUD approval has turned out to be a mistake. Mary McKinsey, 18320 Cascade Drive, said this is a bad idea primarily because of the access problem and the fact that they do not need a commercial area here. She would like to see a revised plan with the day care facility but with no commercial development. Office use would have much less traffic and would not cause problems with activity at night. Richard Smith, 18322 Cascade Drive, said he was concerned about the impact on the environment of the trucks that will have to supply stores in a commercial development. Wade Dillon, 7932 Cimarron Lane, said Cascade is a residential street and commercial traffic should be kept off residential streets. He said a strip mall does not fit the neighborhood. Ted Allman, 18262 Cascade Drive, said the curved nature of Cascade presents a different driving pattern and exacerbates the problems caused by increased traffic. Barbara Boyle, 18322 Cascade Drive, encouraged the Council to deny the project and asked that the turnaround for their driveway be done prior to any construction on this proj ect. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Case said he agrees that the critical condition on this project is the traffic flow onto Cascade. He said he would like to continue this so the neighborhood could CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 8 have time to consider the restricted restaurant use and the developer could consider designing a building that would be convertible from office to commercial at some time in the future. Tyra-Lukens said she believed a design as neighborhood retail would be used primarily by the neighborhood and might actually decrease the traffic; however, she was not comfortable with this use if the neighborhood does not want it. She agreed that the access off the residential street is a problem. She thought we should approve the day care center and send the rest of the proposal back to the developer for revision. Thorfinnson said he thought we are dealing with problems that go back five or six years, and we ended up with a road that is going to have to support this development somehow. He asked how many units of medium to high density residential could be built on the site. Enger said it could support ten units per acre which would mean six trips per day per unit. Thorfinnson asked how that figure compares to office use. Enger said that a 20,000 square foot office building would generate 500 trips per day and the Kindercare will generate 832 trips per day. Thorfinnson said he has a problem with the appropriateness of office on this location. He also thought we should approve the day care facility; however, he thought we should have the developer come back to the Planning Commission with some other proposal that would not include office use. Harris said an office park would be considered community commercial versus neighborhood commercial. Enger said it would be hard to say whether a 20,000 - 40,000 square foot office would be appropriate for neighborhood use. Pidcock said she was disappointed there was no sign on the property that this was designated as neighborhood commercial. She was uncomfortable in prescribing office to the developer; however, if the day care center is acceptable, she was okay with that use. She also thought the second part of the project should go back to the developer, although she believed it was unfortunate that it has to go back through the system after this amount of time and effort has been put into the design. Case said he has a hard time splitting this up into two projects because he was concerned about the trees and the stormwater treatment plan. Tyra-Lukens asked how tied-in we are to the designation as neighborhood commercial. Enger said we couldn't elect to change it tonight because it has not been properly published. Harris asked if a change in the pun designation would require a return to the Metropolitan Council. Enger said that might be required if the whole site were to be changed to office but not if only half of the site is changed. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 9 Pidcock asked if the other half would be developable as office. Putnam said they haven't submitted an office plan because that would require a great deal of research. He said it was important for them to proceed with the Kindercare portion as soon as possible and designating office space on the balance of the property would probably mean that another developer would present such a proposal. Harris said she was concerned if we approve only the day care center we are subdividing at the City Council level and that would limit the development on the second parcel. She said we would still have to deal with the traffic issue on Cascade. Thorfinnson said there will be a major impact on Cascade no matter what is approved, and he thought we should approve the day care proposal with specific goals expressed for development of the rest of the property. Enger noted that the amount of traffic generated is about the same for any type of development. Tyra- Lukens said office use would not cause additional traffic on weekends and evenings nor would there be truck traffic. Thorfinnson said he was concerned that the developer has said there will most likely be someone else developing the other parcel if it is designated as office. Tyra-Lukens said that would mean we would lose the ability to keep the tree loss at the level it is now with this plan. City Attorney Ric Rosow pointed out we don't have a proposal just for the day care facility and the developer would need to resubmit a proposal for that portion of the property. Putnam said it is divided into Lot 1 and Lot 2. Rosow asked if the developer would state for the record their willingness to withdraw the western portion from consideration and keep the day care facility as proposed for Lot 2. Putnam said they would agree to do that if the entire project could not be approved. Tyra-Lukens said she would agree to divide it; however, she was concerned that the property line is east of the big stand of trees that proponent has proposed to save as part of the current plan for both parcels. She asked Gray if dividing the property will put us in jeopardy on the NURP pond issue. Gray said that if we are interested in keeping the treatment of storm water in the equation, we would need some understanding that there would be a NURP pond included in the development proposal for the commercial area. Harris questioned whether that would present a hardship to the other site. Thorfinnson asked if the setback required for the new lot line would affect the tree issue. Enger said there is a 50-foot space with the tree line between Lots 1 and 2 and we will be dealing with the preservation of those trees with development on Lot 1. Thorfinnson asked if we know the tree loss on each of the two lots. Enger said we could break it down quite easily. ~~~ ------------------------------ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 10 Case asked if we could ask the developer to place a deed restriction on Lot 1. Enger said we have the original PUD from 1990 in concept and will go forward with the eastern 1.7 acres of this project. Case said he would hate to see the trees get lost in the shuffle. A discussion followed regarding how to preserve the trees on Lot 1. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve lst Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood Commercial on Lot 2 of the proposal; to adopt Resolution 95- 187 for Preliminary Plat approval of 1.7 acres into one lot; to adopt Resolution 95-188 for PUD Concept Review on 1.7 acres; to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations, and with the following conditions for approval of Lot 2: that Lot 1 will be accountable for the storm water ponding and for preserving the trees as a buffer between the two lots, and that the remedial work on Cascade Drive be put in place prior to development. Motion carried unanimously. Case said he would like to see three or four options for Lot 1 with traffic estimates but without drawings. Thorfinnson asked if Staff could do that rather than forcing the developer to do additional work. Enger said Staff could come back to the Council with some ideas and schematic plans, at which point we could give some direction to the developer. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Case, Pidcock, Thorrmnson, Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye." VU. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS vm. PETITIONS. REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REOUEST FROM MR. CHAPIN HALL. 18554 TRISTRAM WAY. TO APPROVE VARIANCE 95-28 DENIED BY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS. Mr. Hall reviewed his request for a variance to allow a zero setback from a side and rear lot line for an accessory bUilding. He would be willing to move the shed if the City required access to utilities in the ten-foot easement area. He and one of his neighbors went through West Suburban Mediation on this matter and his neighbor has since written a letter stating that they do not have a complaint against the construction of the accessory building. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 11 Pidcock was concerned about the issue of emergency access to the utility line and the legal liability to the City if the structure is allowed to be on the easement. Hall replied that he would give permission for the City to knock over the shed in an emergency situation. Case was concerned if we deny the request and we don't actively pursue the enforcement, he could still build it at his own risk. Enger said the ordinance clearly states that accessory structures are not allowed within ten yards of the rear and the side yard lot lines. He said there has never been a variance granted for a zero-lot line structure. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals could not find an issue of hardship in this case as Mr. Hall could build it in another area of his property that would be consistent with the ordinance. Enger said the Board of Adjustments and Appeals reviewed the request on September 14, 1995, and voted 5-1 to deny the request. Thorfinnson and Harris were concerned about approving this request because we have an ordinance that deals with this situation, and the Board of Appeals discussed the issue of hardship. Tyra-Lukens said a change of ownership in the property next door might result in that neighbor not wanting Mr. Hall to come on their property to maintain the structure. She noted that the neighbor would have to plant screening on his property for the shed. Mr. Hall said it is actually a foot or so from the lot line and, if he moves it ten feet or so off the back lot line, it is more noticeable to the neighbors behind him. Case said he would like to review the options available to Mr. Hall and then take the request back through the process. Hall said he was concerned that an ordinance exists but it is not enforced across the boards. Harris said we do enforce the ordinance if it is brought to our attention, and she thought there are options available to Mr. Hall in this situation. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to uphold the decision of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals to deny the request for variance. Motion' carried unanimously. B. NEIGHBORHOOD REOUEST FOR REVIEW OF FOUR-WAY STOP AT .JACKSON DRIVE AND MEADE LANE Dietz reviewed the request presented by Ms Kathy Wagle at the October 3, 1995 Council meeting to halt installation of the four-way stop sign at the comer of Jackson Drive and Meade Lane in order to study the traffic at the intersection more closely. He said the City places stop signs based on discretionary standards, or "warrants". He said this intersection does not meet the standard of 500 vehicles in an eight hour day, but it does meet criteria similar to those in CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 12 other areas. Two collector streets come together at this intersection and there are some limited sight distances. He referred to the letter dated October 8, 1995, from Ms. Bonnie Moren, reviewing the neighborhood concerns and rationale for requesting installation of four-way stop signs at this location. Bonnie Moren, 11103 Jackson Drive, noted that, while she realized that intersection control may not take care of speeding, there is support for the stop signs from the neighborhood. Kathy Wagle, 10928 Jackson Drive, said there are also people in the area who are not in favor of the stop sign. The stop sign would not solve the traffic problem. Neighbors should just report speeders to the Police Department, and there should be occasional speed traps set up in the neighborhood. Linda Bergland, 10984 Jackson Drive, wanted the stop signs installed because the curve in the road and the location of the mailboxes makes it difficult to see kids in the street. Tyra-Lukens questioned whether a neighbor could report a speeder to the Police Department and if they would do anything about it. Dietz said they would need to know what time of day the infraction was taking place in order to have a directed patrol; however, we have 200 miles of City streets and not all police officers work traffic control. Case agreed there is a sight issue. He agreed with installing the stop signs because of concern for the safety of children. Harris concurred that there is a safety issue here, rather than just controlling speed. Tyra-Lukens noted Ms Wagle raised the issue at the last meeting that, if a stop sign is put on the comer, she would not be able to park. Wagle said they would not be able to park to the south side of the driveway. Tyra-Lukens questioned the need for a stop sign coming out of the cul-de-sac. Harris said that the road will go through at a later date. Wagle asked why we can't wait until that time. Dietz said Staff believes signs should be put up in a consistent fashion. Tyra-Lukens asked why not just put the signs on Jackson. Dietz replied removing stop signs can cause confusion. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock to place four-way stop signs at the intersection of Meade and Jackson. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to continue the meeting for 15 minutes to 11:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 13 C. REPORT ON LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT -Hal Freshly, Metropolitan Council Mr. Hal Freshly from the Metropolitan Council reviewed the Livable Communities Act that was enacted this year by the State Legislature. The objective of the Livable Communities Act is to provide affordable housing in the communities where jobs are located and to address concerns about the aging population. If cities want to apply for funds, they must pass a resolution stating that they are working towards some goals. Funds for the following year must be applied for by November 15th of the current year. Harris said the figures presented by the Planning Department show it is extremely difficult for Eden Prairie to reach the goals, so we have outlined a proposal for our participation in the Livable Communities Act in Mr. Enger's letter to Mr. Chuck Ballentine. Enger said we have very high construction costs and high real estate costs. The amount of resources that would be matched would be only about 15 % of what would be necessary to accomplish the low income multi-family goal. He would like to work with Metropolitan Council staff to find a way we are able to productively participate and not sign up for something we can't achieve. Freshly said they have worked with other communities that have increasing land values. The intent of the law is to work cooperatively with cities to meet the identified needs in the City. He suggested that the City adopt a three or five year goal to do what is possible in the direction of the goals and then renegotiate to see what the market has done. Tyra-Lukens quoted a newspaper report that Maple Grove set up reasonable goals but the Metropolitan Council said that was not enough. Freshly replied the situation there is not the same and they have very ambitious goals. Pidcock noted that we have worked hard to have the reverse commute program bring people to the jobs. IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS A. APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT/YOUTH MEMBERS TO COMMISSIONS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the slate of candidates for student/youth membership to the City's Commissions as presented in the October 17, 1995, Staff memorandum. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 17, 1995 Page 14 XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTSOFCQUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & FACILITIES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVEWPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Report on Hennepin County Solid Waste Fee Continued to next meeting. F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS xm. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 11:45 p.m. DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR 11-7-95 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: lTEMNO. Finance -Pat Solie CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST IV.A THESE LICENSES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTf·1ENT HEADS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LICENSED ACTIV1TY. CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.) Barclay Ltd. Development & Construction Gilbert Construction Co. Madsen Karter Construction, Inc. Mumetz Coffee Real Estate Diversified, Inc. Rochon Corporation PLUMBING Econo Plumb Mac Donald Plumbing Company Oak Grove Mechanical Sun Mechanical & Electrical Symington Plumbing Vesey Plumbing Company ActiOn/Direction: 11-7-95 page 1 GAS FITTER Bradley Plumbing Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. Burnsville Heating & Air Condo Cherry Plumbing & Heating Palen/Kimball Company HEATING & VENTILATING Burnsville Heating & Air Condo 3.2 BEER OFF SALE Hiawatha Marketing, Inc. CIGARETTE Hiawatha Marketing, Inc. GAMBLING Telephone Pioneers (Raffle 1-19-96) . ' EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-7-95 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. ISL 8>. DEP ARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger ANDERSON LAKES COMMERCIAL CENTER 3RD Scott Kipp ADDITION Requested Council Action: The Proponent requests that the Council take the following action: • Approval of a formal withdrawal of Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition by 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation for PUD Concept Amendment on 17 acres, PUD District Review on 12.4 acres and Preliminary Plat of l2.4 acres into 3 outlots and road right-of-way. Background: This item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on June 12, 1995 and approved at a fIrst reading of the City Council on July 11, 1995. Since that time, the proponents have decided to withdraw the request and reapply at a later date with a revised preliminary platting request only. This requested action is due to one of the property owners not wanting to participate in the platting of the property. Supporting Reports: 1. Letter ISL./3-1 August 9, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 3rd Addition 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation hereby respectfully requests the withdrawal of the request for PUD Concept Amendment, PUD District Review and Preliminary Plat. 169 Anderson Lakes is by a new application making a request for Preliminary plat of 11.3 acres. Sincerely, 169 Anderson Lakes corp~ , _ bY;;!--t. c;a Its '& L. T rsr .13. -Z- --------------~------------------ DATE: 11/07/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: / V, (Y DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Forest Hills 8th Addition Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Forest Hills 8th Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $600 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $2,995 • Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of $604 • Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public streets and utilities • The requirements of the Developer's Agreement • Revision of plat to include additional drainage and utility easements for storm sewer piping • Combining Lot 5, Block 2 and Outlot B into one lot Background: This plat contains 9.1 acres to be divided into 15 single family lots, two outlots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed August 15, 1995. JJ:ssa cc: Duane Dietrich, Taurus Properties Randy Hedlund, Hedlund Engineering / 1/ .. e.~1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Forest Hills 8th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Forest Hills 8th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated November 1, 1995. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk / v· c. z FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION ;:O~EST KNOLLS 62a 2 AIIl. SIll. MD. 225 FO •~~ __________ 1--t--~~r------:NM1t'2:~~3:~jE;62~7.:1i5:~:S~·::1.:~:-----oaDli------/j~~D1~ . 17a 03 ORA fNAGE . co ...; ~ _ --... ~ 8 z Co ':.' i5 ct tf =-14[67 \ ~ 6 r I ~g 4 lat 164. B2 L -r 01: fi L \75. 0\ -- r-N"sa'42-12'E alii! 1 . ?. -rai L 175. 01 -- r-NiiB'42-12~ I.., .., I~ - 10L JBB~~ la.DO_ ~ 1 :2\1 oil ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ FO!?£Sr HILL ROA.D ~ -I I -225.01- 50 ~ ~ '-I -... ~ :a ... ... ~ 50 tl ... ~ ~ 9 17 :3 OUTLOT A g! '" \..&Ii";~~ ,.\'5 \ Cl 2 70.22 II8S' 42' 12' E l/i; UNE. I 1188',z' 12' E 69.78 ~ U;~ -\oj ~ 2 ;j \:~-1IT,26 -, 90.00 588' 42' 12' N ' . \ .... Co \;:: ':.' , ... :tJ ~, gl 8 rz :. ,,' ~ ill ... ~I ,. 4 s '. "---!';; ft 1 I; "a~ ~ I~ ~J .. 0 -.J~ co 1::. :a -. §! L .,Igg.oL . ... - 17 Na9'OS' U'E 102.81 -, 5 0.. OUTLOT 8 274.72 Na8' U' OB' E 626. 73 n: f', .: 90 83 " ...... <'-.. C' CL r"\ l~ l.[j C' -.,. ~- ...... CC C( C' L''': r ~ , , .:r_ '--' < ... .. l'fJ 83 100 I I I GARr;;NAL GREEK ~-- I I I I I I I I \ \ I I GLEN L ----AR80::,. o '" GLEN ~.~. 1-'" I A~8ij~: I GL::;; \ \ DATE: 11107/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: /1. l). SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Aztec Drive Addition Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Aztec Drive Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $1,071 • Satisfaction of bonding for installation of public utilities • The requirements of the Developer's Agreement • Receipt of easement documents for a sanitary sewer line across Anderson Lakes Commercial Center property Background: The plat contains 2.36 acres to be divided into two lots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. Lot 1, Block 1 is the proposed site of the ABRA Auto Body to be constructed in the near future, while Lot 1, Block 2 is an additional commercial lot to be developed at a later date. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed October 17, 1995. JJ:ssa cc: Allen Stowe, Barkley Ltd Development & Construction, Inc. HTPO / /I_ 0. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF AZTEC DRIVE ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Aztec Drive Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Aztec Drive Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated , 1995. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk " ~ ~ ~ --- AZTEC DRIVE I I I I I~ IJ ANC!-:R!;"N LAI-:em '\ GGMMERCIAl. CENTER I "--.:r'J=--A~n()N ~ I L-, I I I I ANDERSON LAJo:E5 CCMIvH·:RCIAl. CENTER 514.8; -.... ~ ~ ,.--~ I -70.;;--1"-r------'-------.-I---;~~·7;-·l":I'·,..-----------l • '0.00 ~-----------I I :~---8 r------t----------.. ·--: ii-r j---------------:- 1.,.73 2 ~ I z ~: LO~ 1 0 ~8 : LOT : ; ~! 7 lihl I s ~ 1-I I '" : : ~ J: ~ON! BLotK ~ I BLOCK 2 I W I I I I '-..j Z L_____ : L ___________ .J ~ ~ 8 I 70,'''' 137.IiU 227.70 i ;;;--...... __ S 88·38'34-W " 514.86 -.. ,~ 1 i ::) :il AZTEC DRIVE '-NOT TAN"NT :il I r------------------------~ I I DRAINAGE AND UTUTY £A$OI£NT$ ARE SHOWN THUS: ,0-11- i : ______ ...1 THE BASIS OF BEARINes 15 ASSUN£D o OENOTtS IRON MONUMENT l Sed. .. ...t 50 '00 BEING to F"[£T IN 'MOTH AND ADJOINING LOT UNItS. UNLESS OTHIO':'MSE !NOte" 1U), AND 10 F"E£T IN MOn.! UNLESS OTHER'MSE INDICATED AHD AD..IOININO RIGHT-OF-WAY UNES. AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT KNOW AU MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Prine. R. No ..... , .'ng'l, fl' ownor of tho following described property Iftulted In the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: That part 01 thtI Nonh 200 t •• t of the We.1 585 f.,. of the Southwelt Quarte, o' Section 23. Township 11SNorth, Rangl 22 WI.'. Hennepin County. Minn •• otN. lying .... arty 0' th, ..... tty right of way rlftl ofTrunk Highway No. 169 .. now locat.d and "'Iblish,d. Ha. caused the aame to be IUt'Vtyed and planed .1 AZTEC DRIVE ADDITION and doe. hereby donale 10 the public for public UII forever the drive and the drainagl and utility .... ments al lhown on thl, pll', In witntn whereof IIkI Prince R. Nal.on ha. hereunto ••• hi, hand this ___ dIIy of 1t8 __ . SII:lNIn PrincoRNltson '50 ADDITION I STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ________ _ The foregoinG Instrument wa. acknowledged before me this day of o 199_ by Prine. R. Nelaon, lingle. Notary Publlc, Co';nl)'. Minn •• ota My commis.ion '.pir •• I hereby certify that I have surveyed and planed the land described on thl, plat I' AZTEC DRIVE ADDITION: that thl, pia. it • correct repr •• entaUon of .ald lurvey: that ,II distanCII ar. conlCtty shown on .lld pili in f.,t and hundredths of • toot that aU monument. hay, be,n correctly plIctd In the ground II shown on laid pia' or will be placed a. required by the local governmental unh: that the out.lde boundary line •• ,e correctl)' d.,lgnated on .ald plat: and that the,e ." no wellandS. as dtflMd In MS 505.02. Subd. 1. to be de.lgnated on aaid plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA Paul A. Thorp, Land Surveyor MlnnelOta LieeMe 13637 COUNTY OF ____ _ The fo"golng Inllr\lment was acknowtedged before me thl. ___ day of ____ _ 199 __ by Paul A. Thorp, Land Surveyor, Minnesota Lictnse No. 13637. N~i8,y;;UbIiC, ---------C;;n.y:-MinM;;.;------- My commillion expire. ________ _ EDeN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA ThIs plat of AZTEC DRIVE ADDITION hal been approved and accepted by the City Council 01 Eden Prairie, MinnelOta at a regular meeting thereol hald this ____ day of =====-,0 199 __ . If appllcabla. the wrinen comment. and recommendatlonl 01 the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engin .. r have bean received by tha City or the prescribtd 30 day period hal etap .. d without receipt of .uch commant. and recommendation •• II provtdtd by MiMtiota Statute •• Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF EOEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 8y Mayor By City Manager TAXPAYER SERVICES DMSION, HENNePIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify thai tax .. payable In t8 __ and priol' yea,. haye been paid lor the land described on !hi, plat. Dated thl, ____ day of , 199 __ • Pltrick H. o'Connor, Hlnnepln County Auditor By Ooputy SURVEY SECTION, HENNEPIN COUIITY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to Minn. Stlt. Section 3838.565 (1988), thl, pia. hi. be.n approved thl. ___ _ day of , 189 ___ , Gary F. C.swel. Hennepin County Surveyor ~'~------------- coum REOOROER, HENNEPH COUIITY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that the within plat of AZTEC DRiVe ADDITION WI. filed In this ollie. this ____ day of .188 __ .t ____ o'clock R. Dan Cartaon. County Recorder By Dlputy 1-1""'6 Hansen Thorp ~ Pellinen Olson Ine. • L ....,-. • ..--. __ --------------------------- EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 1117/95 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM: IV. £ DEP ARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community and Economic Development Media Play Status 1112/95 Chris Enger, Director Requested Council Action: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to negotiate and execute all terms and documents necessary for the sale of 5.6 acres of Eden Prairie Marketcenter within the goals established for the sale of the property by the City CounciL Background: The City Staff has been woking with Media Play to bring the sale of the Marketcenterproperty to closure and the review of the project to completion so that they may be under construction early in 1996. The Purchase Agreement has been signed for several months, but because of the difficulties Media Play has had with their Due Deligence, dates have been extended twice. Because the timing of City Council meetings has not always corresponed well with necessary extensions of the agreement, we recommend that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign a Third Amendment to the Purchase Agreement extending the dates of the agreement, and to execute all remaining documents necessary to complete the negotiation and sale of the Marketcenter property to Media Play, within the goals originally established by the City Council. Media Play has submitted their plan for review by the City, and at this time expects to be completed with the process by mid-January, 1996. rrr, £-l EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCn. AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: Engineering Division Jeffrey Johnson ITEM DESCRIPTION: SchhUnppsVVamutRidge Recommended Action: DATE: 11/07/95 ITEM NO: / II. P Approve resolution for Certificate of Correction to the Schlampps VVamut Ridge Plat IV',. f,. / CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. CERTIFICA TE OF CORRECTION SCHLAMPPS WALNUT RIDGE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie approved the Schlampps Walnut Ridge subdivision on August 15, 1995; WHEREAS, said Schlampps Walnut Ridge subdivision was recorded with the Hennepin County Recorders Office on August 25, 1995; WHEREAS, it was discovered that a mathematical error existed within the subdivision, and it is the desire of all parties concerned to correct said mathematical error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the Mayor and City Clerk are thereby authorized to sign a Land Surveyors Certificate of Correction for Schlampps Walnut Ridge. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 1//· /. t., LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Name of Plat: SCHLAMPPS WALNUT RIDGE Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505.174, Laws of Minnesota, 1957 Jeffrey D. Lindgren, the undersigned, a Registered Land Surveyor in and for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows: 1. That I prepared the plat of SCHLAMPPS WALNUT RIDGE filed on August 25, 1995 in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as Doc. No. 6467797. 2. That said plat contains errors, omissions, or defects in the following particulars, to-wit: a) Two dimensions along the east line of said plat as shown on Sheet 3 of 3 Sheets are incorrect. b) The dimension on the west line of Lot 5, Block 1, which has a bearing of S 17°57'13" W, was not shown on the plat. 3. That said plat is hereby corrected in the following particulars, to-wit: a) The dimension along the east line of the plat (1042.08) from the northeast corner of Outlot B to its intersection with the survey line in Outlot C is 1312.11 feet. The dimension (992.08) along the east line of Outlot B is 1262.17 feet. b) The dimension along said west line of Lot 5 is 87.07 feet. Dated: October 10, 1995 ~ D,~ ~ren n. License No. 14376 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA The above Certificate of Correction to the plat of SCHLAMPPS WALNUT RIDGE has been approved by the City at a regular meeting of the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota held on the day of , 19 __ . Mayor City Clerk HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA This Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this of ______ ,19 __ . By ___________________________ ____ Hennepin County Surveyor DATE: 11/07/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: / ~fi DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 52-175 Engineering Division Rodney W. Rue Concurrence with Hennepin County Designation of County State Aid Highway No. 18 on New Alignment Recommended Action: Motion to approve resolution concurring with Hennepin County's proposal to redesignate County State Aid Highway No. 18 along its new alignment. Overview: Hennepin County has requested this action from the City of Eden Prairie as part of the procedure to redesignate County State Aid Highway No. 18 on its new alignment. Financial Issues: There are no financial issues relating to this request. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. CONCURRENCE WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY DESIGNATION OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 18 ON NEW ALIGNMENT WHEREAS, Hennepin County is proceeding with construction of County State Aid Highway No. 18 (CSAH 18) along Eden Prairie's east corporate limit; WHEREAS, a new alignment is now open to traffic across the Minnesota River; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has asked the City of Eden Prairie to concur with redesignating CSAH 18 between Old Shakopee Road (Riverview Road) and the south County line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie concurs with Hennepin County's proposal to designate County State Aid Highway No. 18 on its new alignment from the south County line, on or near the east line of Section 1, Township 115, Range 22, thence northerly along the new alignment for County State Aid Highway No. 18 to the intersection with Old Shakopee Road (Riverview Road). ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 Between THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA and TOL 12, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED for ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES in connection with RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING MUNICIPAL FACILmES ADJACENT TO MITCHELL ROAD IN EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA This SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.2 made and entered into this day of , 19 __ , by and between the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, hereinafter referred to as the OWNER, and TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND -ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, a corporation with a regular place of business at 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza, 444 Cedar Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, hereinafter referred to as TKD A. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, OWNER previously engaged TKDA to provide architectural and/or engineering services in connection with Reconstruction of Existing Municipal Facilities Adjacent to Mitchell Road in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the Project, which engagement was formalized in a Professional Services Agreement dated March 16, 1993 and subsequent Supplemental Agreement No. 1 dated July 6, 1993, collectively referred to hereinafter as the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the OWNER and TKDA, for the consideration hereinafter named, agree to further amend the Agreement by and through this Supplemental Agreement No.2 as hereinafter stated. 1. EXHIBIT A -SCOPE OF WORK, SECTION II -SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA, PART I -PLANS, Item 1 -Preliminary Design Phase, add the following services which have been provided by TKDA which were not anticipated or included in the Agreement: "1. Develop preliminary designs for several well site alternatives." SA2-1 / V. ;I, 1.1/ / ," II. EXHIBIT A -SCOPE OF WORK, SECTION IT -SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA, PART I -PLANS, Item 2 -Final Design Phase, add the following services which have been provided by TKDA which were not anticipated or included in the Agreement: "1. Provide detailed design and contract documents for treated water watermain connections to the north end of the water treatment plant. m. Provide detailed design and contract documents for a well collector line at the south end of the water treatment plant. n. Prepare cost analysis of 30" watermain versus dual 24" watermains. o. Prepare construction details for watermain construction in the Mitchell Road/ Technology Drive intersection. p. Modify Well House No. 11 plans to meet architectural requirements of adjacent property owners. q. Modify Well House No. 11 site development plans to include landscape berms. r. Prepare modifications to watermain layout due to unknown conditions found during construction. " Ill. EXHIBIT A -SCOPE OF WORK, SECTION II -SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA, PART n CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, Item 2 Construction Phase - General Services, add the following services which have been provided by TKDA which were not anticipated or included in the Agreement: "1. Provide additional construction services due to additional watermain construction and contractor operations. " IV. EXHIBIT A -SCOPE OF WORK, SECTION III -COMPENSATION, the maximum Agreement amount shall be changed from $139,000 to $161,500 to compensate for all work as described in the Agreement. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Supplemental Agreement No.2 the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA By ____________________________ _ By __________________________ ___ TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Dua e T. Prew, P.E. Presl ent By·~~~~~~~~~-----­ Ronald C. Ley, P.E. Associate/Project SA2-2 1/1·/1 ( DATE: 11107/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: / JI. :r SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5349 Engineering Division Approve Change Order No.2 for Intersection Improvements at Anderson Rodney W. Rue Lakes Parkway and Preserve Boulevard Recommended Action: Motion to approve Change Order No.2 for Intersection Improvements at the Anderson Lakes Parkway and Preserve Boulevard intersection. Primary Issues: This change order involves differing site conditions relating to a large (84-inch diameter) catchbasin built over an existing storm sewer pipe on the project. The differing site conditions included a watermain conflict, a larger and deeper storm sewer pipe than what was anticipated, as well as additional excavation and dewatering necessary to set the structure. Financial Issues: This Change Order No.2 results in an increase of $2,943.05 to the construction contract. The change order and the entire project are financed with State-Aid funds. We hereby recommend approval of Change Order No.2 in the amount of $2,943.05 to Hardrives, Inc. IJ/,f. I October 17, 1995 City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road CHANGE ORDER NO.2 Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 PROJECT: Anderson Lakes Parkway and Preserve Boulevard City of Eden Prairie City Improvement Contract No. 94-5349 State Aid Project Nos. 181-102-03, 181-107-07 CONTRACTOR: HARD RIVES, INC. 9724 -10th Avenue South Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 SRF No. 0942014 WHEREAS: The existing storm sewer and watermain pipes were not in the location shown on the as-built plans; WH.EREAS: The Contractor shall be required to change installation techniques and revise proposed catch basin106; THEREFORE: In accordance with the terms of the contract and as discussed herein, you are hereby authorized and instructed to perform the work as itemized below. ~. I Change Order No. 2 Item No. Item Description .. 0506.601 Differing Site Conditions at C8106 CONTRACT SUMMARY Original Contract Amount Change Order No. 1 Change Order No.2 Revised Contract Amount ISSUED BY: {I. )hdl''b .h~ SRF CONSULTING GROUP, I . APPROVED: Alan D. Gray, P.E., City Engineer CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE APPROVED: MN/DOT OFFICE OF STATE AID METRO DIVISION -2-October 17. 1995 * * INCREASE * * Estimated Unit Price Quantity Lump Sum $2,943.05 1 /D(zs/~ DATE DATE DATE IV.£. 3 Amount $ 2,943.05 $189,573.50 $ 9,936.16 $ 2,943.05 $202,452.71 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Ordinances & Resolutions DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: DATE: 11107/95 ITEM NO: / II. J Engineering Divi . Jim Richardso Street Name Change: Fossil Road to Boulder Pointe Road Recommended Action: Recommend changing Fossil Road to Boulder Pointe Road I V, J. / CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the following street shall be renamed: FROM: Fossil Road TO: Boulder Pointe Road in Boulder Ridge Addition FIRST AND FINALLY READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ed~n. Prairie on November 7, 1995. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk I V.J. b DATE: 11107/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Ordinances & Resolutions ITEM NO: IV. K.. SECTION: DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering ~~ Street Name Change: A Portion of City West Parkway to Old Shady Oak Jim Richardso Road I I Recommended Action: Recommend changing the portion of City West Parkway west of Shady Oak Road to Old Shady Oak Road IV·t./ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the following street shall be renamed: FROM: City West Parkway TO: Old Shady Oak Road that portion of City West Parkway lying west of Shady Oak Road FIRST AND FINALLY READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on November 7, 1995. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk DATE: 11107/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: / /I, L SECTION: Petitions & Requests DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5396 Engineering Division Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution receiving 100% petition for Pafko 2nd Addition and ordering preparation of plans and specifications. Background: The owners of Pafko 2nd Addition have requested city installation of public streets and utilities within the subdivision. Site grading has commenced on this project October 31, 1995 in preparation for the installation of said streets and utilities. It is the owners desire to complete grading this fall and begin utility and street installation in the spring of 1996. Part of the owners intent with commencing grading this fall is for showing and marketing purposes over the winter. Staff recommends contracting with H. T. P. o. for the preparation of plans and specifications and also for construction inspection. I V. L. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING 100% PETITION, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR I.C. 96-5396 PAKFO 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council: 1. The owners of 100% of the real property abutting upon and to be benefitted from the proposed improvement have petitioned the City Council to construct said improvements and to assess the entire cost against their property. 2. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, and upon recommendation of the City Engineer, said improvements are hereby ordered and the City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for said improvements in accordance with City Standards and advertise for bids thereon, with the assistance of H.T.P.O. 3. Pursuant to M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 3, the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a copy of this resolution once in the official newspaper, and further a contract for construction of said improvements shall not be approved by the City Council prior to 30 days following publication of this Resolution in the City's official newspaper. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk / /I. L. Z, DATE: 11/07/95 EDEN PRAffiIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Petitions & Requests ITEM NO: /VIII! DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Land Alteration Permit for Marshall Property Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: The Marshalls have requested City Council approval of a land alteration permit to allow placement of fill material on their property located at the northwest corner of Pioneer Trail and Eden Prairie Road. Please refer to the attached letter and graphic that shows the location of fill area. The reasons for the request are as follows: • The Marshalls have an opportunity to obtain this fill at little or no cost • The upgrading of County Road 4 and the future upgrading of Pioneer Trail will impact the Marshall property and their market operations on this site. This grading will provide them with some flexibility for rearranging their market operations as a result of the county road upgradings. The Marshalls will continue to farm this area as well as the area altered. The Marshalls understand that by the City Council granting this permit request, it does not constitute any approvals for future siting of b,uildings or marketing operations. JJ:ssa cc: George Marshall /1I.tH. / The City of Eden Prairie 31 10~5 The Marshalls are requesting a "Fill Permit" for 9100 Eden Prairie Road, Eden Prairie. The permit request is for approximately 1000 yards of fill. The location of the area to be filled can be found on the map that has been attached to this request. If for any reason this permit is denied the Marshalls request in writing the reasons for refusal. Copy recieved on 1 ~ /95----------------------------- 3i :x:: E-o -0::--o Z ~ o . ,II) I I I I I , I I I I , I , , I , , I I I I I , , I I I I , I I I , I I '---, ... , . .ttl~. 0 H ." Ii •• 0,10.10 S :; . . . 'i-;. .... _~ ... ~ ~':::-i-::-_'::""'.-'::'IO·.:..:;ZI~:-.-'_. _---.:~ .. N ~ Z I' I ""~~~J-:' I. :::11 . ~t 'M . i • .oc .L£.10 N . ~ " ,-,o~t8'-.~ " ,-6~'L9t -- 3 .. tl .IL.IO S S31'v'lS3 350/~ ~'y'a3:j ~, " I I I I I I I I I , , I , , ::. .... I I ' l' : !j? I I , I. I C :...: ,. I 0: -0. I ~~.~. : (5 ~&:'i : I c'; ~o .... a::~! . : 'I ': :. ,.--- ~ U 4J .. ::J <J ~ fj -« ~ {IC \l\ ,('\, -2: \..::; y. ~ <J ~ -.J -.J ~ I @..: LJ A ~ -J l.u A f\ '2 <:( If) ~ ~ ::r: 1.1- lL a EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-7-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.A. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger V ALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1 st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres; Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this item at their October 9, 1995 meeting. The plans have been revised based on the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 6, 1995. Supporting Reports: 1. Minutes dated October 9, 1995 2. Staff Report dated October 6, 1995 3. Correspondence V. ~.-I APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION October 9, 1995 COMMISSION MEMBERS: Kenneth E. Clinton, Randy Foote, Ismail Ismail, Katherine Kardell, Douglas Sandstad, Edward Schlampp, Mary Jane Wissner STAFF MEMBERS: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Planner Elinda Bahley, Recording Secretary IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. V ALLEY PLACE OFFICE -PHASE II by Design I of Edina. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres and Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres for a 6,400 sq. ft. office building. Location: 9973 Valley View Road. I V, A.. -2- Eden Prairie Planning Commission Minutes -October 9, 1995 Robert Davis, representing Design I of Edina, reviewed his development proposal with the Planning Commission. He noted that he represents Design 1 of Edina as owner, president and architect. They currently have two offices and don't have any building to expand on at either location. The proposal is to build a building at 9973 Valley View Road, and relocate the 16 person company to Eden Prairie. They have a purchase agreement to buy that property. The existing four buildings were built in 1981 as part of a complex of five buildings. His proposal is to construct the fifth building. The proposal includes modifying the parking slightly, to include a turn- around so that you can drive in and make a loop back around and exit out. It will help the traffic flow. The building is two story with 6,400 square feet. The proposal is to be similar in character to the existing buildings. It's a heavily wooded site. There are three trees in a cluster proposed to be removed. Per the Staff's recommendation, they intend to increase the tree landscaping and add four more evergreens to screen the parking from the neighboring property. As an architect, he would like the plan to be unique and not to be in competition with the average office space. He has included many special features such as two indoor parking stalls and a fireplace in the conference room. One floor will be for his company and one floor will be available for rent. He is asking for three variances from the Board of Appeals: 1. A variance of a lot without public road frontage, which has existed since 1981. 2. Zero lot line to parking setback, which exists now for the other four buildings. 3. The percentage of exterior material for 64% wood siding. All the variance requests are consistent with the other four building sites, and are justified to maintain this consistency. 2 ".~. -3 Eden Prairie Planning Commission Minutes -October 9, 1995 Kipp reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commission. He noted that this is the last site of the 1981 approval. The building is slightly larger than the previously approved plan. However, the scale of the building fits in well with the site. The variances identified are all variances that were needed with the original property. However, because the site was not built, the variances lapsed. Staff supports the variances as consistent with the overall development. The drainage on the property, including the drainage from the roof, will be collected by the storm sewer and will result in limited off-site drainage. Tree loss is approximately 22% which is about half of what was endorsed in the original plan due to the way the property was originally designed. Staff recommends that the sewer and water line going to the building be relocated so the construction of these lines will not harm the two existing oak trees that the proponent is trying to save in the front of the building. The proponent has agreed to do that. Staff recommends that there be some additional landscaping provided in the southeast comer of the site to provide for the necessary screening of the parking. The Valley Place Office Association has reviewed this proposal and has endorsed it. Staff does recommend approval. Ismail asked what a zero lot line is. Kipp replied that the north lot line runs through the parking lot. City code requires a 10 foot setback for parking. So, the need for a variance is zero lot line instead of 10 feet. Ismail asked if there have been any changes in the zoning code since this site was approved in 1981. Kipp replied that there are probably more regulations in place today than there were in 1981, the Tree Preservation Ordinance is one example. Wissner expressed concern about where the mechanical equipment will be. Davis replied that there's a small basement space provided in the building for the equipment. There will be nothing on the roof. There will be air conditioning condensers on the ground. Sandstad commented that he likes the project. He is sure it's consistent with the architecture of the existing buildings, but more unique and distinctive than the other buildings. He supports the project. 3 Eden Prairie Planning Commission Minutes -October 9, 1995 Foote commented that the project looks nice. He appreciates the proponent saving a number of the large trees. He supports the project and the variances. Ismail asked how the proponent feels about the staff recommendations. Davis replied that he is not opposed to any of the suggestions. He noted that he was, in fact, embarrassed that he did not catch the item of moving the water line on the plan. Wissner commented that this will finish off this site nicely and she supports it. Schlampp was concerned about the street coming right up against the parking lot, using the parking lot as a cul-de-sac. In a couple of years if they have an Owners Association out there, the building use may change and traffic may increase. Therefore, do they require that the use of the parking lot be part of the covenants of this particular Owners Association. Davis replied that there would be a cross access parking easement. A copy of it has been submitted to the City. Anyone of the five businesses can use the parking lot. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Design I of Edina for Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres based on plans dated September 29, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff report dated October 6, 1995. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Design I of Edina for Site Plan review on 0.67 acres based on plans dated September 29, 1995, and subject to the recommendation of the Staff Report dated October 6, 1995. Motion carried 6-0-0. v.A,-~ STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: FEE OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Scott A. Kipp, Planner Michael D. Franzen, City Planner October 6, 1995 Valley Place Office -Phase II Design I of Edina Ltd. Valley Place Office Association 9973 Valley View Road 1. Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres. 1 V.A.-fo PK. DATA - :.~: \ .; .. _. w. II IND. ~rd 2 nd •• 1 ·~;iAHj.:~ , 10 TH ST. INO. '--_-I ?AI~ .. 7E~H:·;:)LO·.i·;' pr\.~ TM. I ST. \ 1st ~ 'Z 7 .. ' ,,~ 1: ~ ~ a: !;; .;{ , :i:: !l: • . -' 'J Z 0 I I C ~ ~ • ~ • ~ > STRiP "I~I· 7 '4\"\~ [T. II. 51 "'" Staff Report Valley Place Office -Phase II October 6, 1995 BACKGROUND This site is part of the Valley Place Office development approved by the City Council in 1981. The property was zoned Office and platted into five separate building sites on 4 acres. Four of the five buildings have been constructed at this time. The site is heavily wooded consisting of numerous oak and pine trees. The development has an Owner's Association, and uses a shared driveway and parking. SITE PLAN The proposal is to construct a 6,400 sq. ft. office building on the last remaining site. The base area ratio (BAR) will be 14%, with a floor area ratio (FAR) of 22%. City Code allows up to a 30% BAR and 50% FAR within the Office District. The 1981 approval showed a 5,050 sq. ft. office building on this site at a 17% FAR. All building setbacks are met. A total of 32 parking stalls is required based on five spaces for every 1,000 sq. ft. of bUilding. The plan provides a total of 34 spaces meeting code requirements. A cross-access and parking agreement has been established for the property. VARIANCES The following variances will be necessary for this site: 1. Lot without public road frontage (pre-existing condition). 2. Zero lot line to parking. 3. Percentage of wood as exterior building material. When this development was initially reviewed, a variance was needed for a lot without public frontage. The property was platted and developed, but the variance was never reviewed. Therefore, this pre-existing condition should be brought into conformance through the variance process. The plan depicts the construction of the parking area across an existing lot line. Since these parking stalls are proposed up to the lot line, a variance for a zero foot setback will be necessary. This variance request is consistent with the existing parking lot system and will be maintained through a cross access and parking agreement with the Owner's Association. The original Valley Place Office approval included the use of 64% redwood as an exterior material for each of the buildings. City code permits a maximum of 25% wood in the office Staff Report Valley Place Office - Phase II October 6, 1995 zoning district. Since the building for this lot was not constructed within a year of that variance, as requird, the variance became obsolete. The proposed building uses 63% redwood siding, which is consistent with the original variance approval. Since the design of the project meets the overall intent of the 1981 approval, and that the variances reflect consistency with the other building sites in the development, Staff supports the variance requests. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Grading directs parking lot run-off to the existing catch basin located in the northeast comer of the site. The majority of site runoff, including all roof drainage, will be collected by storm sewer. The Engineering Department has reviewed the storm drainage calculations, and has determined that the existing system can accommodate the proposed runoff. The tree inventory shows a total of 215 caliper inches of significant oak and pine trees on site. Tree loss is 48 caliper inches, or 22%. This tree loss is less than the 49% shown on the 1981 plan. Tree replacement is 14 caliper inches. The proposed retaining walls shall be constructed of modular masonry materials. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water connections are available to the site from services within in the existing driveway. The location of the proposed sewer and water lines to the building will need to be relocated to avoid the loss of two significant oak trees. LANDSCAPING Twenty caliper inches of landscaping is required based on the building square footage, and 14 caliper inches of tree replacement, for a total of 34 caliper inches. The landscaping plan depicts 39 caliper inches, consisting mainly of austrian pine. City Code requires screening of parking areas. Since the parking area is at an elevation higher than the surrounding properties, and is quite visible from these properties, additional evergreen trees should be placed along the southeast comer of the parking area. (See attachment). \1, A.-9 Staff Report Valley Place Office -Phase II October 6, 1995 ARCHITECTURE The two story, 6,400 sq. ft. office building will consist of redwood siding, veneer stone and glass material. This building, includes similar elements from the other buildings such as roof pitch, long spans of window and redwood siding. The Valley Place Office Association has endorsed the plan. All ground or roof-mounted mechanical equipment will require physical screening. The plans do not depict the location or type of mechanical equipment. A mechanical equipment screening plan is required prior to City Council review. The trash area is proposed to be located within the building. RECOMMENDATION Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 0.67 acres, and Site Plan Review on 0.67 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, based on this report, plans dated September 29, 1995 and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review the proponent shall: A. Revise the location of the proposed utility services to the building to save existing oak trees. B. Revise the landscaping plan to show additional evergreen trees along the southeast comer of the parking lot area to screen the parking (see attachment). C. Revise the plans to locate all proposed ground or roof mounted mechanical equipment and how this equipment will be physically screened from view. 2. Prior to 2nd Reading by the City Council, the proponent shall receive variances from the Board of Appeals for a lot without public road frontage, zero foot setback to parking, and 64% use of wood as an exterior building material. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall stake the construction limits with snow fencing within the wooded areas. Said fencing shall be installed at least 48 hours prior to grading and field inspected by the City Forester. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: v. A.. -,0 Staff Report Valley Place Office -Phase II October 6, 1995 A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscape improvements indicated on the approved plan. C. Submit building plans for review and approval by the Fire Marshal. D. Provide retaining wall plans that use modular masonry materials. E. Submit building material samples and colors for review and approval by the City Planner. F. Pay the cash park fee. O. Provide a copy of a recorded cross-access and parking agreement for the property. V, A. , -I l J .J '.L <l 2. 21 ,j ~ 1. 1 -<1 \- _ ll\ - I Z 4 cL ~ :J <l = ,-... ,~ .. -'-....g ('1'-' DATE: 11107/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: // 8 SECTION: Public Hearing DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division David Olson Vacation 95-08: Vacation of Easement in Woodland Ponds of Eden Prairie Published 10/26/95 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt the resolution vacating part of the drainage and utility easement over Lot 19, Block 4, Woodland Ponds of Eden Prairie. Overview: The property owner has requested this vacation to facilitate the construction of a swimming pool and planting area. A small part of the construction area will encroach into the existing high water storage area of the adjacent pond. This encroachment will have a negligible effect on the total storage capacity and function of the pond. Supporting Information: Vacation drawings CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF PART OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN WOODLAND PONDS OF EDEN PRAIRIE (VAC 95-08) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has a certain drainage and utility easement described therein as follows: That part of Lot 19, Block 4, Woodland Ponds of Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 19; thence South 62 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 19 a distance of 82.0 feet to the point of beginning of the property to be herein described; thence South 08 degrees 31 minutes 54 seconds West a distance of 22.12 feet; thence South 27 degrees 27 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of62.10 feet to a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 19; thence South 62 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds West along said southeasterly line a distance of 24.00 feet; thence North 36 degrees 13 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 42.72 feet; thence North 19 degrees 40 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 55.54 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 19 said point being 2.80 feet southwesterly a measured along said northwesterly line from the point of beginning; thence North 62 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds East along said northwesterly line a distance of 2.80 feet to the point of beginning. Except the northwesterly and southeasterly 5.00 feet of said Lot 19. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 7, 1995 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easement is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easement as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk TEL No. Established in 1962 Oct 6,95 11:41 No.004 P.03 1\ !W LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. INVOICE NO. ___ _ F. B. NO. _____ _ LAND SURVEYORS . REGlS1ERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Ave. No.' Minneapolis. Minnesota 55428 ~urbe!,ors €ertifitate Lo:o-r I~ r.-~~~+ -NDt?~n.A~1:' ro,.J~~ .. ~ 4i~J.1 iF'AI~/e= \ .,-, C I t.. \ 560·3093 \ \ SCALE." • ____ _ o Dtnote I Iron Monumlnt D Denote. Wood Hub Set For Excovotlon Onl, .000.0 Otnot.. ExllflnO Elevation o Denot •• PropoMd EI.vatlon ~ o.IlO'" Surface Drainage ___ Propolld Top of Block ___ Proposed OorOOt Floor ___ Propolld Lo", .. t Floor TyPi of 9ulld~ - \ EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11107/95 SECTION: Public Hearing ITEM NO: y.e, DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division 1995 Special Assessment Hearing for I.C. 93-5312 Street and Utility Improvements Alan D. Gray for Dell Road Recommended Action: Approve the assessments as proposed for I.C. 93-5312 Dell Road Street and Utility Improvements to the subdivisions of Bearpath, Dellwood Estates and the Big Woods. Background: The assessments for the above referenced project were continued from the October 17, 1995 Council meeting at the request of Bearpath. Bearpath requested additional time to review the proposed assessments for Dell Road improvements particularly related to certain costs to construct a storm sewer outfall easterly through the Dellwood Estates project from Dell Road. Since that meeting staff has provided Bearpath with additional information regarding the proposed assessments and reviewed the appropriateness of the storm sewer costs as they impact the proposed , assessments to Bearpath. Analysis: Exhibit A attached to this memo shows the preliminary plan for Bearpath in the vicinity of Dell Road. A low point in Dell Road directly east ofDNR wetland 1003W was to drain westerly into the Bearpath development into a NURP pond constructed along one of the golf course fairways behind residential units fronting on Breckenridge Lane. You will note that the original plan showed two NURP ponds in the vicinity of Breckenridge Lane to provide sufficient capacity to treat the local watershed and the drainage from Dell Road. The Development Agreement between Eden Prairie and Bearpath specifically stipulates that Bearpath will provide treatment capacity for storm water from Dell Road. In the plan that has been implemented the outfall storm sewer from the low point in Dell Road, just easterly of DNR wetland 1003W, has been extended easterly through the Dellwood subdivision to a NURP pond for treatment rather than west into the Bearpath development. This change was made to accommodate difficulties Bearpath was having in providing the NURP pond capacity, as shown in Exhibit A, at the hydraulic grade lines proposed in the preliminary plans. Bearpath is now questioning whether the cost for the outfall storm sewer, from Dell Road through the Dellwood subdivision, is appropriately part of the cost to be assessed to Bearpath and Dellwood for the road improvements. If the outfall storm sewer had been constructed as shown in Exhibit A the cost for the outfall storm sewer would be part of the Dell Road improvements assessed to the abutting properties, i.e., Bearpath and Dellwood. It is possible that the cost for the outfall storm sewer through Bearpath might have been somewhat less than the cost to construct it through Dellwood, but Bearpath was unable to accommodate the original plan. The City is still delivering the Dell Road improvements at slightly below the cost estimated in the assessment agreement with Bearpath. The proposed assessment to Bearpath is $383,138.74 for Dell Road improvements. The assessment agreement estimated the cost to be $394,630.23. The revision to the storm sewer plan has been of some benefit to Bearpath as shown on Exhibit B attached to this memo. With only the local storm drainage from the subdivision to be treated in this area, two NURP ponds as shown on Exhibit B have been combined into one pond along the golf course fairway. The number of residential units constructed along the east side of Breckenridge Lane in Block 3 have been increased from 10, as shown on the preliminary plan, to 12 as shown on the final plat, i.e., Exhibit B. It is the opinion of City staff that the outfall storm sewer costs, currently questioned by Bearpath, are an appropriate part of the proposed assessments for Dell Road improvements. The change to the storm sewer plan has been of significant value to Bearpath while the Dell Road improvements have been delivered by the City at a cost below the estimate contained in the assessment agreement. ADG:ssa V. t.1 Lw ..... . , .. - • ••• · "'.1-4 " , I I • . '. -. ."'>:f-"", .... , /''/( • 4 •• -.....--.. • ...... • "\I' ') -- 12. I.tJts Z71,57 SSS·OS04'E \ , \ ,~~ ~g MATCH LINE M (SEE SHEET II OF II ~o " ,.; SHEETS) 1_~9·~ ,-15; 1-I~ r--. 1-10 L-2~ ,-is( /:-10 -Iroc u CITY OF EDEN PRAffiIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections in the proposed assessments for the following improvements to wit: (See Exhibit A attached) NOW, mEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie: 1. Such proposed assessments are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands in the final assessment rolls, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as shown on Exhibit A. Installments shall bear interest at the rates shown on Exhibit A, except no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid on or before November 30, 1995. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 1995 until December 31, 1995. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes beginning in 1996. 4. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearings as provided for the assessments being made, upon any properties abutting on the improvements but not herein assessed for the improvement when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 5. The assessment data of Resolution No. 95-186 is herein revised in accordance with Exhibit A attached hereto. APPROVED on November 7, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk ! . 2. I.C. 93-5312 Street and Utility Improvements to Dell Road from Pioneer Trail north to North line of Bearpath Addition Project Cost: City Share: Bearpath 218 Lot Units Dellwood Estates 190 Lot Units Big Woods 23 Lot Units $ 1,682.74 Lot Units Net Assessment: $ 1,239.47 Lot Units $ 757.00 Lot Units 5 Years at 7.5 Parcel PIOn Property Owner Legal Description 19-116-22-43-0004 Bearpath Addition Ll,Bl 19-116-22-44-0007 Bearpath Addition L2,Bl 19-116-22-44-0008 Bearpath Addition L3,Bl 19-116-22-44-0009 Bearpath Addition L4,Bl 19-116-22-44-0010 Bearpath Addition LS,Bl 19-116-22-44-0011 Bearpath Addition L6,Bl 19-116-22-44-0012 Bearpath Addition L7,Bl 19-116-22-44-0013 Bearpath Addition L8,Bl 19-116-22-44-0014 Bearpath Addition L9,Bl 19-116-22-44-0015 Bearpath Addition LlO,Bl 19-116-22-44-0016 Bearpath Addition Lll,Bl 19-116-22-44-0017 Bearpath Addition Ll2,Bl 19-116-22-44-0018 Bearpath Addition Ll3,Bl 19-116-22-44-0019 Bearpath Addition Ll,B2 19-116-22-44-0020 Bearpath Addition L2,B2 19-116-22-44-0021 Bearpath Addition L3.B2 19-116-22-44-0022 Bearpath Addition L4.B2 19-116-22-44-0023 Bearpath Addition LS.B2 19-116-22-44-0024 Bearpath Addition L6,B2 -19-116-22-44-0025 Bearpath Addition L7.B2 19-116-22-44-0026 Bearpath Addition L8.B2 19-116-22-41-0002 Bearpath Addition L9.B2 19-116-22-41-0003 Bearpath Addition LlO.B2 19-116-22-41-0004 Bearpath Addition Lll.B2 19-116-22-41-0005 Bearpath Addition Ll2,B2 19-116-22-41-0006 Bearpath Addition Ll3,B2 19-116-22-41-0007 Bearpath Addition Ll4,B2 19-116-22-41-0008 Bearpath Addition Ll5,B2 19-116-22-41-0009 Bearpath Addition Ll6.B2 19-116-22-41-0010 Bearpath Addition Ll7,B2 19-116-22-41-0011 Bearpath Addition Ll8.B~ 19-116-22-41-0012 Bearpath Addition Ll,B3 /I. c.. Sr-' Deferred $Amount 2000 $ 1,290,057.22 $ 654,010.69 $ 636,046.53 1995 SAmount $Amount 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 1,682.74 ParcelPID# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount SAmount SAmount 19-116-22-41~13 Bearpath Addition U,B3 1,682.74 19-116-22-41~14 Bearpath Addition L3,B3 1,682.74 19-116-22-41~15 Bearpath Addition L4,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~016 Bearpath Addition LS,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~017 Bearpath Addition L6,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~18 Bearpath Addition L7,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~19 Bearpath Addition L8,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~20 Bearpath Addition L9,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~21 Bearpath Addition LIO,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~22 Bearpath Addition LILB3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~023 Bearpath Addition LI2,B3 1.682.74 19-116-22-41~026 Bearpath Addition LI,B6 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-41~027 Bearpath Addition L2,B6 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-41~028 Bearpath Addition L3,B6 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-41~29 Bearpath Addition L4,B6 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-44~28 Bearpath Addition LS,B6 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-44~31 Bearpath Addition Twin Unit 1.682.74 19-116-22-44~032 Bearpath Addition Twin Unit 1.682.74 19-116-22-44~029 Bearpath Addition L6,B6 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-41~30 Bearpath Addition LI,B7 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-14~004 Bearpath Addition LI.B9 Twin Unit 3.365.48 19-116-22-14~5 Bearpath Addition L2.B9 Twin Unit 3,365.48 19-116-22-14~006 Bearpath Addition L3,B9 Twin Unit 3,365.48 19-116-22-11~3 Bearpath Addition LI,BIO 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~ Bearpath Addition L2,BIO 1,682.74 19-116-22-14~7 Bearpath Addition L3,BI0 1,682.74 19-116-22-14~8 Bearpath Addition L4,BIO 1.682.74 19-116-22-11~05 Bearpath Addition LI,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~06 Bearpath Addition L2,Bli 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~07 Bearpath Addition L3,Bli 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~8 Bearpath Addition L4,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11-0009 Bearpath Addition LS,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~10 Bearpath Addition L6,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~11 Bearpath Addition L7,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~012 Bearpath Addition L8,Btl 1,682.74 19-116-22-11-0013 Bearpath Addition L9,Bll 1.682.74 19-116-22-11~14 Bearpath Addition LlO,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11~015 Bearpath Addition Lll,Bll 1,682.74 Parcel PION Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 $Amount $Amount $Amount 19-116-22-11-0016 Bearpath Addition LI2,Bll 1,682.74 19-116-22-11-0017 Bearpath Addition LI3,BIl 1,682.74 19-116-22-11-0018 Bearpath Addition LI,B12 1,682.74 19-116-22-11-0019 Bearpath Addition L2,BI2 1,682.74 19-116-22-11-0020 Bearpath Addition L3,B12 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0002 Bearpath Addition LI,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0003 Bearpath Addition L2,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0004 Bearpath Addition L3,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0005 Bearpath Addition L4,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0006 Bearpath Addition LS.B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0007 Bearpath Addition L6,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0008 Bearpath Addition L7,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0009 Bearpath Addition L8,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0010 Bearpath Addition L9,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0011 Bearpath Addition LIO,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0012 Bearpath Addition LIl,B13 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0013 Bearpath Addition LI2,BI3 1.682.74 19-116-22-12-0014 Bearpath Addition LI,B14 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0015 Bearpath Addition L2.B14 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0016 Bearpath Addition L3.B14 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0017 Bearpath Addition L4,B14 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0021 Bearpath Second Add. LI,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0022 Bearpath Second Add. L2,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0023 Bearp_ath Second Add. L3,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0024 Bearpath Second Add. L4,BI 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0025 Bearpath Second Add. LS,BI 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0026 Bearpath Second Add. L6.Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0027 Bearpath Second Add. L7,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0028 Bearpath Second Add. L8.Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0029 Bearpath Second Add. L9,Bl 1.682.74 19-116-22-12-0030 Bearpath Second Add. LIO,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0031 Bearpath Second Add. LIl,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0032 Bearpath Second Add. Ll2.Bl 1.682.74 19-116-22-12-0033 Bearpath Second Add. Ll3,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0003 Bearpath Second Add. LI.B2 ;' 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0004 Bearpath Second Add. L2,B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0005 Bearpath Second Add. L3.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0006 Bearpath Second Add. L4,B2 1,682.74 ,/ () 7 Parcel PION Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount SAmount SAmount 19-116-22-21~007 Bearpath Second Add. LS.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~008 Bearpath Second Add. L6,B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~9 Bearpath Second Add. L7.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~00S Bearpath Second Add. L8.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~006 Bearpath Second Add. L9.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~007 Bearp_ath Second Add. LIO.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~O8 . Bearpath Second Add. LIl,B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~009 Bearpath Second Add. L12.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~10 Bearpath Second Add. L13.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~11 Bearpath Second Add. LI4.B2 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~012 Bearpath Second Add. LI.B3 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~13 Bearpath Second Add. L2.B3 1,682.74 19-116-22-31~OO8 Bearpath Second Add. Ll.B4 1.682.74 19-116-22-31~9 Bearpath Second Add. L2.B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-31~10 Bearpath Second Add. L3.B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-31~011 Bearpath Second Add. L4.B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-31~012 Bearpath Second Add. LS.B4 1.682.74 19-116-22-31~013 Bearpath Second Add. L6,B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-~t4 Bearpath Second Add. L7.B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~001 Bearpath Second Add. L8,B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~002 Bearpath Second Add. L9,B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~O03 Bearpath Second Add. LlO,B4 1,682.74 19-116-22-24-ooIS Bearpath Second Add. LI,BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~016 Bearpath Second Add. L2.BS 1,682.74 19;116-22-24~017 Bearpath Second Add. L3,BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~004 Bearpath Second Add. L4,BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~00S Bearpath Second Add. LS.BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~006 Bearpath Second Add. L6,BS 1.682.74 19-116-22-13-0007 Bearpath Second Add. L7,BS 1.682.74 19-116-22-13-0008 Bearpath Second Add. L8,BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13-0009 Bea!path Second Add. L9.BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~010 Bearpath Second Add. LIO.BS 1.682.74 19-116-22-13~011 Bearpath Second Add. LIl.BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13-0012 Bearpath Second Add. LI2.BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~13 Bearpath Second Add. Ll3,BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13~014 Bearpath Second Add. Ll4,BS 1,682.74 19-116-22-13-0015 Bearpath Second Add. LIS.BS 1.682.74 19-116-22-13-0016 Bearpath Second Add. LI6.BS 1.682.74 Parcel PIO# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount $Amount SAmount 19-116-22-13~17 Bearpath Second Add. Ll7.B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-13~18 Bearpath Second Add. Ll8.B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-13~19 Bearpath Second Add. Ll9.B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-13~020 Bearpath Second Add. L20.B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-13~021 Bearpath Second Add. L21.B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-13~022 Bearpath Second Add. L22.B5 1,682.74 19-116-22-42~05 Bearpath Second Add. L23.B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-42~006 Bearpath Second Add. L24,B5 1,682.74 19-116-22-42-0007 Bearpath Second Add. L25,B5 1.682.74 19-116-22-24~018 Bearpath Second Add. Ll,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-24-0019 Bearpath Second Add. L2.B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~020 Bearpath Second Add. L3,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~021 Bearpath Second Add. L4,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~22 Bearpath Second Add. LS,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-24~023 Bearpath Second Add. L6,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-24-0024 Bearpath Second Add. L7.B6 1.682.74 19-116-22-24~025 Bearpath Second Add. L8,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~010 Bearpath Second Add. L9,B6 . 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~Oll Bearpath Second Add. LlO.B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0012 Bearpath Second Add. Ul,B6 1.682.74 19-116-22-21-0013 Bearpath Second Add. Ll2,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0034 Bearpath Second Add. U3.B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0035 Bearpath Second Add. Ll4,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0036 Bearpath Second Add. LlS,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0037 Bearpath Second Add. Ll6.B6 1,682.74 - 19-116-22-12~038 Bearpath Second Add. Ll7.B6 1,682.74 19-1l6-22-12~039 Bearpath Second Add. Ll8.B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-12-0040 Bearpath Second Add. Ll9,B6 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0015 Bearpath Third Add. U,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-21-0016 Bearpath Third Add. L2.BI 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~017 Bearpath Third Add. L3.BI 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~018 Bearpath Third Add. L4.Bl 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~019 Bearpath Third Add. LS.Bl 1,682.74 '19-116-22-21-0020 Bearpath Third Add. L6,Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~21 Bearpath Third Add. L7.Bl 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~O22 Bearpath Third Add. L8.BI 1,682.74 19-116-22-21~023 Bearpath Third Add. Ll.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-21-0024 Bearpllth Third Add. L2.B2 1,682.74 //-e. CJ Parcel PION Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount SAmount SAmount 19-116-22-21~2S Bearpath Third Add. L3.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~26 Bearpath Third Add. L4.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~27 Bearpath Third Add. LS.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~28 Bearpath Third Add. L6.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-21~29 Bearpath Third Add. L7.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-21-0030 Bearpath Third Add. L~.B2 1;682.74 19-116-22-21~31 Bearpath Third Add. L9.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-43-0012 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot A 1.700.00 19-116-22-43~13 Bearpath Townhomes OutlotB 1.700.00 19-116-22-43~14 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot C 1.700.00 . 19-116-22-43-0015 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot D 1.700.00 19-116-22-43~16 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot E 1.700.00 19-116-22-43~17 Bearpath Townhomes OutlotF 1.700.00 19-116-22-43~18 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot G 1.700.00 19-116-22-43~19 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot H 1.700.00 19-116-22-43-0020 Bearpath Townhomes Outlot I 1.700.00 19-116-22-43-0010 Bearpath Townhomes LI.Bl 500.00 19-116-22-43-0011 Bearpath Townhomes L2.BI 500.00 19-116-22-14~17 Bearpath Trail Add. U.BI 1,682n4 19-116-22-14-0018 Bearpath Trail Add. L2.BI 1.682.74 19-116-22-14-0019 Bearpath Trail Add. LI.B2 3.365.48 19-116-22-14-0020 Bearpath Trail Add. L2.B2 3.365.48 19-116-22-41-0038 Bearpath Trail Add. L3.B2 3.365.48 19-116-22-41~39 Bearpath Trail Add. L4.B2 3.365.48 19-116-22-41-0040 Bearpath Trail Add. LS.B2 3.365.48 19-116-22-41-0047 Bearpath Trail Add. L6.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-41-0046 Bearpath Trail Add. L6.B2 1.682.74 19-116-22-41-0043 Breckenrid!!e Second LI.Bl 1.682.74 19-116-22-41-0044 Breckenrid!!e Second L2.Bl 1.682.74 19-116-22-41-0045 Breckenridge Second L3.Bl 1.682.16 20-116-22-23-0003 Dellwood Estates Add LI.BI 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0004 Dellwood Estates Add L2.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0005 Dellwood Estates Add L3.Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0006 Dellwood Estates Add L4.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0007 Dellwood Estates Add LS,B} 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0008 Dellwood Estates Add L6,Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0009 Dellwood Estates Add L7,Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0010 Dellwood Estates Add LS,BI 1.239.47 Parcel PID# Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount SAmount SAmount 20-116-22-23~11 Dellwood Estates Add L9.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23~12 Dellwood Estates Add LIO.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-24~63 Dellwood Estates Add LIl.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-24~64 Dellwood Estates Add LI2.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0014 Dellwood Estates Add LI4.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23~IS Dellwood Estates Add LlS.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0016 Dellwood Estates Add LI6.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0017 Dellwood Estates Add LI7.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23~19 Dellwood Estates Add LI.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0020 Dellwood Estates Add L2.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23~21 Dellwood Estates Add L3.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0022 Dellwood Estates Add L4.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0023 Dellwood Estates Add LS.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0006 Dellwood Estates Add LI.B3 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0026 Dellwood Estates Add L6.B3 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0010 Dellwood Estates Add LI.B4 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0011 Dellwood Estates Add L2.B4 1.239.47 20-116-22-32~12 Dellwood Estates Add L3.B4 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0013 Dellwood Estates Add L4.B4 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0014 Dellwood Estates Add LS.B4 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0016 Dellwood Estates Add LI.BS 1.239.47 20-116-22~32-OO17 Dellwood Estates Add L2.BS 1.239.47 20-116-22-32~18 Dellwood Estates Add L3.BS 1.239.47 20-116-22-32~19 Dellwood Estates Add L4.BS 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0021 Dellwood Estates Add LI.B6 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0022 Dellwood Estates Add L2.B6 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0024 Dellwood Estates Add LI.B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0025 Dellwood Estates Add L2.B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0026 Dellwood Estates Add L3.B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0027 Dellwood Estates Add L4.B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0028 Dellwood Estates Add LS.B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0029 . Dellwood Estates Add L6.B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0030 Dellwood Estates Add L7.B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0031 Dellwood Estates Add LS.B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0032 Dellwood Estates Add L9.B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0033 Dellwood Estates Add LIO.B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0034 Dellwood Estates Add LIl.B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-33-0008 Dellwood Estates Add L12.B7 1,239.47 1/ () • /1 Parcel PION Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 $Amount SAmount $Amount 2~116-22-33~9 Dellwood Estates Add Ll3,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33-0010 Dellwood Estates Add Ll4,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33-0011 Dellwood Estates Add Ll5,B7· 1,239.47 20-116-22-33~12 Dellwood Estates Add L16,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33-0013 Dellwood Estates Add L17,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33~14 Dellwood Estates Add L18,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33-0015 Dellwood Estates Add L19,B7 1.239.47 2~116-22-33~16 Dellwood Estates Add L20~B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-33~17 Dellwood Estates Add L21,B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-33-0018 Dellwood Estates Add L22,B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-33~19 Dellwood Estates Add L23,B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-33~20 Dellwood Estates Add L24,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33-0021 Dellwood Estates Add L25,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-33-0022 Dellwood Estates Add L26,B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0036 Dellwood Estates Add L28,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0037 Dellwood Estates Add L29,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32~38 Dellwood Estates Add L30,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32~39 Dellwood Estates Add L31,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32~40 Dellwood Estates Add L32,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32~41 Dellwood Estates Add L33,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32~42 Dellwood Estates Add L34,B7 1.239.47 2~116-22-32-0043 Dellwood Estates Add L35,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0044 Dellwood Estates Add L36,B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-32-0045 Dellwood Estates Add L37,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0047 Dellwood Estates Add L39,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0048 Dellwood Estates Add L40,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0027 Dellwood Estates Add L41,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0028 Dellwood Estates Add L42,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0029 Dellwood Estates Add L43,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0030 Dellwood Estates Add L44,B7 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0031 Dellwood Estates Add L45,B7 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0034 Dellwood Estates 2nd LI,Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0035 Dellwood Estates 2nd L2,BI 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0036 Dellwood Estates 2nd L3,Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0037 Dellwood Estates 2nd L4,BI 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0038 Dellwood Estates 2nd LS,Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0039 Dellwood Estates 2nd L6.Bl 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0040 Dellwood Estates 2nd L7.Bl 1,239.47 II'. (I. I z., Parcel PION Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount SAmount SAmount 20-116-22-23-0041 Dellwood Estates 2nd L8,Bl 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0042 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll,B2 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0043 Dellwood Estates 2nd L2,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0044 Dellwood Estates 2nd L3,B2 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0045 Dellwood Estates 2nd L4,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0046 Dellwood Estates 2nd LS,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0047 Dellwood Estates 2nd L6.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0048 Dellwood Estates 2nd L7,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0049 Dellwood Estates 2nd L8,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0050 Dellwood Estates 2nd L9,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0051 Dellwood Estates 2nd LlO,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0052 Dellwood Estates 2nd Lll,B2 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0053 Dellwood Estates 2nd LI2.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0054 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll3.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0055 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll4,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0056 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll5,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0057 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll6,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0058 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll7,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0059 DelIwood Estates 2nd LIS.B2 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0060 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll9.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0061 Dellwood Estates 2nd L20,B2 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0062 Dellwood Estates 2nd L21.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0063 Dellwood Estates 2nd L22.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0064 Dellwood Estates 2nd L23,B2 1.239.47 20.116-22-23-0065 Dellwood Estates 2nd L24.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0066 Dellwood Estates 2nd L25.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0067 Dellwood Estates 2nd L26.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0068 Dellwood Estates 2nd L27.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0069 Dellwood Estates 2nd L28.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0070 Dellwood Estates 2nd L29.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0071 Dellwood Estates 2nd L30.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0072 Dellwood Estates 2nd L31.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0073 Dellwood Estates 2nd L32.B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0074 Dellwood Estates 2nd L33,B2 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0075 Dellwood Estates 2nd Ll.B3 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0076 Dellwood Estates 2nd L2.B3 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0077 Dellwood Estates 2nd L3.B3 1.239.47 20-116-22-23-0078 Dellwood Estates 2nd LI,B4 1.239.47 ,/' n I~ Parcel PIDN Property Owner Legal Description Deferred 2000 1995 SAmount SAmount SAmount 20-116-22-23-0079 . Dellwood Estates 2nd U,B4 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0080 Dellwood Estates 2nd L3,B4 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0081 Dellwood Estates 2nd L4,B4 1,239.47 20-116-22-23-0082 Dellwood Estates 2nd LS,B4 1,239.47 20-116-22-32-0052 Dellwqod Estates 2nd Outlot A 79,326.57 20-116-22-22-0033 The Big Woods Ll,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0034 The Big Woods U,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0035 The Big Woods L3,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0036 The Big Woods L4,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0037 The Big Woods LS,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0038 The Big Woods L6,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0039 The Big Woods L7,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0040 The Big Woods L8,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0041 The Big Woods L9,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0042 The Big Woods LI0,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0043 The Big Woods LIl,Bl 757.00 20-116-22-22-0044 The Big Woods LI,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0045 The Big Woods L2,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0046 The Big Woods L3.B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0047 The Big Woods L4.B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0048 The Big Woods LS.B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0049 The Big Woods L6,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0050 The Big Woods L7,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0051 The Big Woods L8,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0052 The Big Woods L9,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0053 The Big Woods LIO,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0054 The Big Woods Lll,B2 757.00 20-116-22-22-0055 The Big Woods LI2,B2 757.00 ~ DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA NOVEMBER 7, 1995 SECTION: DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. FINANCE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI CHECKS NUMBER 35713 THRU 36208 . . Action/Direction: NOVEMBER 7, 1995 35713 35714 35715 35716 35717 35718 35719 35720 35721 35722 35723 35724 35725 35726 35727 35728 35729 35730 35731 35732 35733 35734 35735 35736 35737 35738 35739 35740 35741 35742 35743 35744 35745 35746 35747 35748 35749 35750 35751 35752 35753 35754 35755 35756 35757 35758 35759 35760 LILA KLEHR ENTERTAINMENT-STOP THE VIOLENCE PROGRAM. CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 9-29-95. CARVER COUNTY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SV PAYROLL 9-29-95. CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 9-29-95. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 9-29-95. GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 9-29-95. HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 9-29-95. HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 9-29-95. ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 9-29-95. MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 9-29-95. MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 9-29-95. MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PAYROLL 9-29-95. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PAYROLL 9-29-95. UNITED WAY PAYROLL 9-29-95. ELINDA BAHLEY SUPPLIES-COUNCIL. BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES LIQUOR STORES. CURT BJORLIN REFUND-CONDUCT FORFEIT FEE. CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL TRIPS-YOUTH RECREATION. DIAMOND T RANCH SPECIAL TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TRAINING EXPENSE-CITY HALL. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PAYROLL 9-29-95. GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE TRAINING EXPENSE-CITY HALL. CRAIG JERDE SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. LAKELAND NURSERY INC SERVICE-EDEN PRAIRIE MARKET CENTER PROJECT. MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER SPECIAL TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION. NCTRC DUES-CITY HALL. REGISTAR PROF DEVEL & CONF SERVIC TRAINING-CITY HALL. COLIN D SCHMIDT TUITION REIMBURSEMENT. KEVIN SCHMIEG REIMBURSEMENT FOR SEMINAR REGISTRATION KIM STENDER DON SWENSON JIM TORNOE U S WEST CELLULAR INC VOIV OUT CHECK BELLBOY CORPORATION DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO GRIGGS COOPER & CO INC MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO PEPSI-COLA COMPANY THE WINE COMPANY THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY CARL JULLIE MTI DISTRIBUTING CO NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A PARAGON CABLE MPLS FEE. REFUND-CONDUCT FORFEIT FEE. REIMBURSE FOR FIREARMS TRAINING SUPPLIES. REIMBURSEMENT FOR GOLF LESSON PROGRAM. SERVICE. BEER. BEER. BEER. BEER. BEER. MIX. MIX. BEER. BEER. REIMBURSEMENT-CONFERENCE EXPENSE. MUFFLER/WHEEL RIM/HOSE-FLEET SERVICES. PAYROLL 10-13-95. SERVICE. 38032936 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 1. VI 500.00 49.37 276.93 90.00 350.00 8185.50 240.46 275.08 3484.26 227.42 247.00 1251.50 510.76 157.75 79.44 819.67 200.00 263.59 639.00 125.00 41510.80 130.00 175.00 184886.10 11.55 154.00 40.00 20.00 322.41 40.00 50.00 49.53 304.50 916.19 0.00 49.00 11053.15 13116.11 24.04 5522.50 785.45 162.80 19.95 13860.50 27.50 381.77 88709.94 33.84 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35761 35762 35763 35764 35765 35766 35767 35768 35769 35770 35771 35772 35773 35774 35775 35776 35777 35778 35779 35780 35781 35782 35783 35784 35785 35786 35787 35788 35789 35790 35791 35792 35793 35794 35795 35796 35797 35798 35799 35800 35801 35802 35803 35804 35805 35806 35807 DON SCHWARTZ SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. SUBWAY YOUTH SPECIAL TRIP-YOUTH RECREATION DEPT. WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT UNI PAYROLL 10-13-95. U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. GTE SUN ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. CONRAD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC SERVICE-RINK ONE ARENA DEHUMIDFICATION- HOPKINS POSTMASTER JUDY NIEDENT CATHY NYMAN PETTY CASH AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SALLY ADAMS NORMA ANDERSON GERALD BOHN CAREER TRACK SEMINARS MS2 LAURA FIEDLER REBECCA GIN NDR ENGINEERING VOIV OUT CHECK TOM HERRMANN BRUCE HUTCHINS MARTHA KISSINGER LINDA KLOECKER SCOTT MCLAIN MEMA NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EMT CAROL REPPHUN KRISTI ROBERTS CHUCK SCHAITBERGER PAM SCHWEITZER ELAINE SMITH LOWELL THONE STEVE VERNSTRUM JIM ZAIC MRS JACK B ANDERSON ROBERT ANDERSON JAN BAILEY MAURA BOEHM CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATER PADMA DEVINENI DEBRA ERICKSON WILLIAM KARANIKOLAS LISA KEMPSTON PAT LAMBERT THIRHA NGUYEN STACEY PITZRICK VICKI TURNER COMMUNITY CENTER. POSTAGE-UTILITY BILLING DISTRICT 3. REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. PETTY CASH-CITY HALL. DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. REFUND-GYMNASTICS CLASS. REFUND-OUTDOOR CENTER RESERVATION. REIMBURSEMENT-MN CHIEFS CONFERENCE/ MILEAGE/MEALS. CONFERENCE EXPENSE-CITY HALL. REFUND-DANCE CLASS. REFUND-MAPLEWOOD YOUTH TRIP. CONFERENCE EXPENSE-UTILITIES. REIMBURSE FOR SUPPLIES-PARK MAINTENANCE. REIMBURSE-IAPMO MEETING/INSPECTIONS. REFUND-YOUTH TRIP. REFUND-YOUTH TRIP. REFUND-GOLF CLUB CLASS. TRAINING-POLICE DEPT. TRAINING-POLICE DEPT. REFUND-GOLF CLASS. REIMBURSEMENT FOR PARK SHELTER RENTAL FEE. CONFERENCE EXPENSE-MN CHIEFS CONFERENCE MILEAGE/MEALS. SERVICE-INSTRUCTIONAL-FEES PAID. REFUND-FIRST AID CLASS. DUES-INSPECTION DEPT. INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES-FEES PAID. IAPMO AND HENNEPIN CYT MEETINGS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-CONDUCT FORFEIT FEE. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SKAING LESSONS. SPECIAL EVENTS-SENIOR CENTER. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS FOR PRIYANKA. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 1402451 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 2. 527.50 51.12 700.00 2578.90 151.29 6980.00 920.60 22.50 10.32 48.44 128.00 4.35 49.00 137.34 500.00 18.00 23.00 45.00 0.00 18.59 15.00 25.00 20.00 12.00 15.00 75.00 12.00 70.00 132.46 100.00 25.00 20.00 114.00 30.10 6.00 100.00 18.00 26.00 100.00 21.00 21.00 20.00 48.00 21.00 20.00 20.00 24.00 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35808 UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS SEMINAR-UTILITIES SUPT .. 260.00 35809 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-NOV/DEC SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER. 191.14 35810 MARYLS WANTTIE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 20.00 35811 WONDER WEAVERS ENTERTAINMENT-HALLOWEEN PARTY. 85.00 35812 CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 10-13-95. 90.00 35813 CARVER COUNTY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SV PAYROLL 10-13-95. 276.93 35814 CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT PAYROLL 10-13-95. 49.37 35815 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 10-13-95. 400.00 35816 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 10-13-95. 8735.50 35817 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-13-95. 240.46 35818 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 10-13-95. 275.08 35819 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 10-13-95. 3344.26 35820 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS UNION DUES FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER -1306.00 PAYROLL 10/13/95. 35821 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-13-95. 227.42 35822 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PAYROLL 10-13-95. 1251.50 35823 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 10-13-95. 247.00 35824 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 10-13-95. 25.00 35825 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR P.E.R.A. LIFE INSURANCE FOR THE MONTH OF 237.00 NOVEMBER PAYROLL 10-13-95. 35826 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PAYROLL 10-13-95. 130.00 35827 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PAYROLL 10-13-95. 43350.94 35828 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 10-13-95. 139.75 35829 CARD SERVICES-BUSINESSCARD CONFERENCE/MEETING EXPENSE-CITY COUNCIL. 2292.72 35830 KARL HESS SERVICE-GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. 95.00 35831 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 35832 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 35833 HEATHER HOLM MILEAGE/INTERNSHIP SERVICE-ADAPTIVE 209.80 RECREATION DEPT. 35834 CHRIS KOHLBECK REFUND-SOFTBALL CONDUCT FORFEIT FEE. 25.00 35835 MUSIC MEMORIES B LEE AND SHERRY C SERVICE-ENTERTAINMENT/SENIOR CENTER. 200.00 35836 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE. 42133.37 35837 BRENT OBERT REFUND-SOFTBALL FORFEIT FEE. 25.00 35838 RANDY 0 BRIEN REFUND-SOFTBALL FORFEIT FEE. 25.00 35839 CHAD SEWICH SERVICE-SPECIAL TRIP CHAPERONE-FEES PAID. 71.25 35840 VOIV OUT CHECK . 0.00 35841 TRACY SPRANGRUD SERVICE-DANCE INSTRUCTOR-FEES PAID. 198.10 35842 UNITED PROPERTIES NOV RENT-LIQUOR STORE III. 6554.25 35843 LOIS WILDER SERVICE-MEMOIR WRITING/SENIOR CENTER. 157.50 35844 JEFF WILLIAMS REFUND-SOFTBALL CONDUCT FORFEIT FEE. 25.00 35845 FAIRS NURSERY SERVICE-RILEY LAKE PARK LANDSCAPING. 24029.60 35846 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR OCTOBER-2165.12 PAYROLL 10-13-95. 35847 HEALTHPARTNERS HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR THE MONTH OF 27183.55 NOVEMBER-PAYROLL 10-13-95. 35848 MEDICA CHOICE HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR THE MONTH OF 49905.25 NOVEMBER-PAYROLL 10-13-95. 35849 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR THE MONTH OF 2949.78 OCTOBER-PAYROLL 10-13-95. 35850 BARB WELTER REFUND-GYMNASTICS. 26.00 21915364 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 3. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35851 KELLY INN -ST CLOUD CONFERENCE EXPENSE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 356.80 PROGRAM. 35852 BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 771.31 35853 JASON-NORTHCO LP #1 NOVEMBER RENT-LIQUOR STORE I. 5197.00 35854 PAUL KOENIG REFUND-SOFTBALL CONDUCT FORFEIT FEE. 100.00 35855 JERRY LASLEY REFUND-ADULT HORSE FARM TRIP. 24.00 35856 MAGC C/O SHARI MOORE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION AND 1996 ANNUAL 125.00 MEMBERSHIP FOR MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATORS -TERRY KUCERA. 35857 JANET MUNSON REFUND-ADULT MEDETERRANEN TRIP. 350.00 35858 CATHERINE RUE REFUND-MASSAGE WORKSHOP/SENIOR CENTER. 8.00 35859 TARGET CENTER WIZARD OF OZ ON ICE TICKETS-PRESCHOOL 140.00 TRIP. 35860 IRENE TIPPIE REFUND-HIGH SCHOOL PLAY. 9.25 35861 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. 5543.42 35862 NANCY MORGAN REFUND-ICE SKATING LESSONS. 50.00 35863 U S POSTMASTER FILL POSTAGE METER-CITY HALL. 8000.00 35864 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER DUCK COSTUME/TRENCHER/GENERATOR-ADAPTIVE 188.93 REC DEPT-UTILITIES-CITY HALL UNITED WAY. 35865 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC FEATHERING VALVE/COUPLER BODY AND NOSE-577.64 UTILITIES/FLEET MAINTANCE. 35866 ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICE-FINANCE DEPT. 1092.00 35867 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS SECURITY MAINTENANCE-WATER PLANT/STORAGE 339.04 BLDG. 35868 ADVERTISING INCENTIVES CLOTHING-LIQUOR STORES. 2299.90 35869 AEC ENGINEERING FIELD INSPECTION SERVICES HYDROPILLAR. 13624.30 35870 ALLMAX PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-UTILITIES 450.00 DIVISION. 35871 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE IN MOBILE F/F PEDESTAL. 316.71 35872 AMERICAN BANK NA PAYING AGENT FEES FOR PERIOD OF 3/21/95-9/ 668.50 20/95. 35873 AMERICAN FORESTS MEMBERSHIP FEES-FORESTRY DEPT. 45.00 35874 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC MEMBERSHIP AND PUBLICATION-UTILITIES 270.75 DIVISION. 35875 AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNESOTA PAGING SERVICE-POLICE DEPT/UTILITIES/CITY 398.45 HALL. 35876 AMERICAN RED CROSS PART FEES FOR JUNE-AUG/LIFEGUARDING 1392.79 COURSE FEE-AQUATICS. 35877 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC MEMBERSHIPS AND TRAINING SUPPLIES-601.15 UTILITIES DIVISION. 35878 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY LIGHTS HALLOWEEN PARTY 95 -YOUTH 97.07 RECREATION. 35879 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC POST DRIVER/SIGNS/PLATES/POSTS-UTILITIES-1646.62 STREET DEPT-ENGINEERING. 35880 MARTIN ANDERSON STOVE-REHAB PROGRAM. 676.56 35881 AQUA ENGINEERING INC PARTS-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 5.75 35882 ARMOR SECURITY INC LOCKS/KEYS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 42.60 35883 ARTEKA NURSERIES INC LANDSCAPE MATERIALS-UTILITIES DIVISION/ 25432.66 WELLHOUSE NO 11 IRRIGATION WORK/SOD-CITY CENTER. 7084120 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 4. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35884 ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY SHOP SUPPLIES-FLEET SERVICES. 322.31 35885 ASTLEFORD INTL INC PAN GASKET/JOINT/BALL-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 34.40 35886 DON ATKINS BALES-PARK MAINTENANCE. 25.00 35887 AUDIOVISUAL INC SERVICE REPAIRS-CITY HALL. 297.50 35888 AVR INC CEMENT-PARK MAINTENANCE/STREET DEPT. 825.49 35889 BAND S INDUSTRIES INC SPEC VEST-POLICE DEPT. 191.04 35890 B & STOOLS RACHET SCREWDRIVER/WIRE STRIPPER/CLAMPS/ 1960.17 WRENCHES/COUPLERS/SOCKETS/HAMMER/ FLASHLIGHT PROTECTOR/CORDLESS DRILL KIT/ CABLE CUTTERS/COLD CHISELS/KNIFES/TIRE IRON/SCREWDRIVERS/BATTERY CABLES/TUBING CUTTER-UTILITIES-FIRE DEPT~ATERPLANT. 35891 BACHMANS LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES-WELL NO 11. 49.19 35892 BACONS ELECTRIC CO REPAIRS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER 6248.55 TREATMENT PLANT/SEWER LIFT STATION/WATER WELL 6. 35893 BARBER ASPHALT CONTRACTING DRIVEWAY REPAIRS-UTILITIES DEPT. 700.00 35894 S H BARTLETT CO INC REPAIR KIT/POPPET ASSY-COMMUNITY CENTER. 146.67 35895 BAUER BUILT INC VALCE CORES/ACID/LAMPS/REFLECTORS/PLUGS-428.17 FLEET SERVICES. 35896 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC PAINT/LIQUID ICE/MUFFLER/ADHESIVE/EDGER 1108.22 BLADE/PAINTING-COMMUNITY CENTER ICE ARENA. 35897 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP PARTS FOR LIFT STATION-UTILITIES DIVISION. 387.42 35898 L M CIT INSURANCE CLAIM-CITY HALL. 381.08 35899 BIFFS INC SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE. 5923.34 35900 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER PLANT EXPANSION. 116868.26 35901 BILL CLARK OIL CO INC GEAR LUBE/OIL-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 951.12 35902 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON SEPT 95 KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT. 594.00 35903 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO SERVICE AND REPAIR-UTILITIES/PARK 212.66 MAINTENANCE. 35904 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON GRAPHICS-ADAPTIVE RECREATION. 84.00 35905 BOOKMASTER PUBLICATIONS/TRAINING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 43.05 35906 BOYD HOUSER CANDY & TOBACCO CO HALLOWEEN CANDY-HALLOWEEN MALL EVENT 95. 465.75 35907 BRAUER AND ASSOCIATES LTD SERVICE-PURGATORY CREEK ENTRY AREA 1750.00 PLANNING. 35908 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION SERVICE-PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. 9517.17 35909 BRO-TEX INC SHOP SUPPLIES-FLEET SERVICES. 278.43 35910 PAUL BROWN SERVICE-FOOTBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 647.50 35911 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STORM DRAINAGE DEPT. 17.77 35912 NATHAN BUCK SERVICE-SOFTBALL/VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES 665.00 PAID. 35913 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE SUBCRIPTION-CITY HALL. 67.14 35914 BETH MORLEY BURNETT SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 85.50 35915 BURTON EQUIPMENT INC CYLINDER CART-UTILITIES. 164.64 35916 CALENDARS SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT. 21.85 35917 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE-POLICE DEPT/FIRE 2729.34 DEPT. 35918 CARGILL INCORPORATED DEICING SALT-STREET MAINTENANCE. 7530.53 35919 CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY POST DRIVER-STREET MAINTENANCE. 798.75 35920 COMMERCIAL REPAIR SERVICE INC COFFEE MAKER REPAIR-UTILITIES DIVISION. 363.80 16288481 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 5. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35921 CARLSONS TREE SERVICE SERVICE-TREE REMOVAL. 150.00 35922 CASH REGISTER SERVICE AND SALES SERVICE PRINTER-COMMUNITY CENTER. 98.00 35923 CENTRAIRE INC SERVICE-FIRE STATION 1. 339.90 35924 CHANHASSEN LAWN AND SPORTS REPAIRS-WATER SYSTEM PLANT. 111.73 35925 CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS IN CORP BULLSEYE BANNER-FIRE DEPT. 146.09 35926 C02 SERVICES OCTOBER TANK RENTAL C02-COMMUNITY CENTER. 72.06 35927 COLOR OPTIC LITERATURE RACKS-SENIOR CENTER. 487.67 35928 CONCEPT MICRO IMAGING FILM/FILM DUPLICATION-CITY HALL. 72.42 35929 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC TRASH RACK-STORM DRAINAGE DEPT. 181.05 35930 COMPRESS AIR & EOUIPMENT CO NIPPLE SEAL-FIRE DEPT. 38.82 35931 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 35932 JOHN CONLEY REIMBURSE-DISPATCHER SHIRTS/CORPORATE 93.01 LANDS END CATALOG/HAND VAC-POLICE DEPT. 35933 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS ADVIL/TILTBIN/WIPES/LATEX GLOVES/SOAP/ 774.29 IBUPROFEN-UTILITIES. 35934 COPY EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 667.74 35935 CORPORATE AUTO RENTALS INC TRANSPORTATION-ADAPTIVE RECREATION. 110.66 35936 CLIFF CRACAUER MILEAGE-FLEET SERVICES. 78.96 35937 CROWN MARKING INC SUPPLIES-INSPECTIONS. 18.11 35938 CRYSTEEL DIST INC HITCHES-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 1810.50 35939 CTL COMPANY SUPPLIES=POLICE DEPT. 66.82 35940 CUB FOODS MEETING SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 175.56 35941 CULLIGAN -METRO SOFTENER TANK SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER. 36.60 35942 CUSTOM COURTS INC RESURFACE TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURTS. 14075.00 35943 CUSTOM REfRIGERATION REPAIRS-MILLER PARK. 246.25 35944 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME~ATER TREATMENT PALNT. 15111.29 35945 DALCO TISSUE/PAPER TOWEL/FLOOR SWEEPER/AIR 895.96 FRESHENER-WATER PLANT-COMMUNITY CENTER. 35946 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO LENS COVERS/SPANNER WRENCH/OLSEN CHAIN 577 .10 AND CABLE BELT LOOPS/HELMET FRONTS-FIRE DEPT. 35947 DAY-TIMERS INC SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT/FINANCE DEPT. 181.80 35948 DECORATIVE DESIGNS NOVEMBER PLANT MAINTENANCE-CITY HALL. 360.00 35949 GARY DIETHELM SERVICE-PLEASANT HILLS CEMETRY. 675.00 35950 DELEGARD TOOL CO SWITCH SEAL/HALOGEN LAMP/RECHARGEABLE LT-45.37 FLEET MAINTENANCE. 35951 EUGENE DIETZ MEETING EXPENSES-ENGINEERING DEPT. 153.00 35952 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 122.05 35953 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 15.01 35954 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER. 21.97 35955 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER/PARK AND REC DEPT/ 124.28 ADAPTIVE REC. 35956 DYNA SYSTEMS SUPPLIES~ATER TREATMENT PLANT. 808.36 35957 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY EQUIP MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL. 376.44 35958 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIV PEST CONTROL-FIRE STATION 1-3-4 AND 5. 186.40 35959 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSE-CITY HALL. 82.00 35960 EDEN PRAIRIE CRIME PREVENTION FUN REIMBURSEMENT FOR OVERPAYMENT ON TURN OFF 300.00 THE VIOLENCE AND THE COMMUNITY HAttOWEEN PARTY. 35961 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD OIL PLUG/VALVE ASSY-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 178.04 4006531 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 6. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35962 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 SPACE RENTAL FOR SQUARE DANCING/COMMUNITY 198.75 BAND/TAE KWON DO-SENIOR CENTER-YOUTH RECREATION. 35963 EDEN PRAIRIE SENIORS REIMBURSEMENT FOR CHOW MEIN DINNER. 168.93 35964 CITY OF EDINA SEPT 95 WATER TESTING~ATER DEPT. 315.00 35965 EKLUNDS TREE & BRUSH DISPOSAL SEPTEMBER 95 BRUSH DISPOSAL-FORESTRY DEPT. 600.00 35966 ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL SERVICES VIN ANALYSIS-WATER DEPT. 330.00 35967 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC BATTERY PACK/RAIN JACKET/BOOTS/OVERHALL 3607.20 RAIN/REPAIR BLOCK/LIFELINE STEEL WIRE ROPE/OXYGEN SENSOR/CALIBRATION GAS/ HYDROGEN SULFIDE-UTILITIES DIVISION. 35968 JEFF ELWELL REIMBURSE FOR CASSETTE DECK-COMMUNITY 26.61 CENTER. 35969 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-CITY HALL. 15.40 35970 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE/SODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE/SODIUM 11331.65 PHOSPHATE/FERRIC SULFATE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 35971 FEIST BLANCHARD AUTO WHSE DISC PADS-FLEET SERVICES. 182.65 35972 FERRELLGAS PROPANE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 85.48 35973 FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO GARBAGE BAGS-WATER DEPT. 104.95 35974 FISHER ENTERPRISE TOP SOIL/BEACH DIRT-PARK MAINTENANCE. 2480.39 35975 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY X-TEND-A-CLAW-WATER DEPT. 326.93 35976 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE-YOUTH RECREATION. 96.32 35977 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION POSTAGE-POLICE DEPT/COMM DEVELOPMENT. 46.50 35978 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP CONT. HEAD W/SLIDE-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 136.25 35979 WOODY FRANKLIN REIMBURSE FOR TRAINING MATERIALS-POLICE 17.85 DEPT. 35980 FRESHWATER FI1I mATroN WATER FILTERS-UTILITIES DIVISION. 44.00 35981 VOIV OUT CHECK 0.00 35982 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE-FINANCE DEPT. 667.01 35983 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC REPAIRS-COMMUNTIY CENTER. 246.40 35984 GE CAPITAL MODULAR SPACE REPAIRS TO RENTAL BLOGS-PRAIRIE VIEW PARK. 66.39 35985 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO HANGERS/PENCILS/MAGNETIC CLIP/HANGING 1442.68 FOLDERS/TAB FOLDERS/FILE FOLDERS/PAPER/ LEAD/PENSCALENDARS/STORAGE BOXS/ APPOINTMENT BOOKS/PADS/CLIPBOARD- UTILITIES DIVISION. 35986 GETTMAN COMPANY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE I. 36.00 35987 GINA MARIAS INC MEETING EXPENSE-FIRE DEPT. 180.49 35988 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS-COMMUNITY CENTER/WATER DEPT/ 1252.28 PARKS DEPT/FLEET MAINTENANCE/UTILITIES. 35989 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES COMPUTER SUPPLIES-FINANCE DEPT. 85.90 35990 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY WET PAINT TAPE/PAINT/PAINT SUPPLIES-WATER 134.70 DIVISION. 35991 GOLD COUNTRY INC JACKETS-POLICE DEPT. 405.50 35992 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION. 36.75 35993 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC PUBLICATIONS-FINANCE DEPT. 50.00 35994 W W GRAINGER INC BOLT KIT/SAFETY FAN GUARD/FAN BLADE/FAN 2023.18 MOTER/CORD/WALL BRACKET-WATER TREATMENT PLANT CASTERS-FLEET SERVICES. 2674214 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 7. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 35995 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 48.10 35996 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC REPAIRS-SEWER LIFT STATION/OUTDOOR CENTER/ 808.70 MILLER PARK. 35997 HACH COMPANY CLORINE-WATER PLANT. 188.45 35998 HALLOCK CO INC TIMERS-WATER DEPT. 728.67 35999 HANCE COMPANIES ALTERNATOR-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 105.09 36000 HANSEN THORP PEL LINEN OLSON INC SERVICE-RICE MARSH LAKE PARK. 1529.66 36001 PETER J HARMS SERVICE-BASKETBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 108.00 36002 HAYDEN MURPHY EQUIPMENT CO REPAIRS TO SCRAPER BAR AND COCO MATS-153.13 STREET DEPT. 36003 LAURIE HELLING MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 35.84 36004 LAURIE HELLING REIMBURSEMENT FOR POSTAGE-COMMUNITY 6.90 CENTER. 36005 HEAVENLY HAM MEETING EXPENSE-FIRE DEPT. 27.50 36006 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY OWNERS MAILING LABLES-COMMUNITY 270.00 DEVELOPMENT. 36007 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ROOM AND BOARD SEPT 95-POLICE DEPT. 3644.25 36008 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER WASTE MANAGEMENT FEE FOR OCTOBER 95-PARK 72.89 MAINTENANCE. 36009 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM-9900 SPRING ROAD. 2918.90 36010 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF BOOKING FEE FOR SEPTEMBER 95-POLICE DEPT. 1048.51 36011 D C HEY COMPANY INC REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES FOR 360.99 COPIER-WATER DIVISION. 36012 HESS SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS REPAIRS-UTILITY DEPT. 71.94 36013 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING REHAB PROGRAM-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 4905.06 36014 LARRY HILLARD SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 90.00 36015 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MFG FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE. 388.73 36016 HOIGAARDS CUSTOM CANVAS HOSE CARRIERS-FIRE DEPT. 395.29 36017 HONEYWELL INC MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR OCT AND NOV 95-3996.00 WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 36018 HORIZONS UNLIMITED ENTERTAINMENT-SENIOR CENTER. 36.00 36019 HOSP SUPPLY SCIENTIFIC PROD FIRST AID SUPPLIES-UTILITIES DIVISION. 436.25 36020 HYDRAULIC SERVICES INC PARTS-FLEET SERVICES. 210.15 36021 ICE SKATING INSTUTUE OF AMERICA MEMBERSHIP DUES-COMMUNTIY CENTER ICE 275.00 ARENA. 36022 INACOM CORPORATION WATER METER REPAIR~ATER DEPT. 588.01 36023 ICMA SUBCRIPTION-CITY HALL. 65.00 36024 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 117.04 36025 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 265.64 36026 INFRATECH SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 300.00 36027 INSTITUTE FOR CORPORATE AND INDUS TRAINING-UTILITIES DIVISION. 750.00 36028 JAMESTOWN AREA LABOR-MANAGEMENT C SUBCRIPTION-UTILITY DIVISION. 89.00 36029 CHRIS JESSEN SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 105.00 36030 BRENVA JERVE SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 131.25 36031 JOEL ENTERPRISES NOZZLES/WANDS/HOSES-WATER DEPT. 822.32 36032 EF JOHNSON CO RADIOS/CHARGERS/POWER SUPPLYS-POLICE DEPT. 13593.92 36033 J J KELLER & ASSOC INC TRAINING SUPPLIES-UTILITIES DIVISION 1995.91 SUBCRIPTIONS-UTILITES DIVISION. 36034 KNOX LUMBER PLYWOOD-FIRE DEPT. 141.96 36035 KOCH SULFUR PRODUCTS SULFUR-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 713.55 4253860 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 8. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 36036 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER LOCKS/WASHERS/FUNNELS/NOZZLES/CAULK/HOOKS/ 1124.93 NUTS/BOLTS/BUNGEES/PLIERS/BATTERIES/SNOW BRUSHES/FUEL/WASP KILLER/BRACKETS/DUST PAN/DRILL BITS/ANCHORS/SCREWS/SPRAYER/ ROPE/SPRINKLER/HOSE/ADAPTERS/SANDPAPER/ REDUCER/FIRTTINGS/COUPLERS/PIPES/CAN OPENER-UTILITIES. 36037 TERRY KUCERA MILEAGE-CITY HALL REIMBURSEMENT FOR 28.99 SOFTWARE. 36038 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LATEX GLOVES/DRUMS AND HOLDERS/WORK MATS/ 2720.11 BEAKERS/FUNNELS/BOTTLES/SIGN/PAILS/ ADAPTER/DRUM LIFTS/BATTERY PACK/EARPIECE WITH MIC/SPRAY SOX/BADGES/DRUM GAUGE/ FLASHLIGHT HOLDER/BUNGEE CORD~ATER TREATMENT PLANT/SAFETY DEPT. 36039 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC SPEEDOMETER/GLASS/TUBE ASY-FLEET 332.93 MAINTENANCE. 36040 LAKELAND INC SERVICE-PRAIRIE MARKET CENTER PROJECT. 123587.10 36041 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 2340.77 36042 LAKESHORE EQUIPMENT CO INC BUMPER-PARK MAINTENANCE. 24.44 36043 AAA LAMBERTS SOD-STREET MAINTENANCE. 4.26 36044 LAMETTRYS COLLISION PATCH HOLES/CLEARCOAT-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 131.20 36045 LANO EQUIPMENT INC BLADES/STARTERS/TRENCHER RENTAL-FLEET 303.38 SERVICES-STREET MAINTENANCE. 36046 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL PROJECT. 1761.46 36047 LIGHTNIN MOUNT MIXER-WATER PLANT. 9433.77 36048 LOGIS SEPT 95 SERVICE. 12033.91 36049 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT BALE CHOPPER-PARK MAINTENANCE. 340.80 36050 LOTUS DELEVOPMENT CORPORATION SUPPLIES-FINANCE DEPT. 78.49 36051 LUNDS SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT. 241.25 36052 LYONS SAFETY SLINGS-UTILITIES DIVISION. 431.21 36053 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC TOW BAR/VERSA CART 60 GAL/DIRT SHOE 2343.60 RUNNER/CLAMPS/MAIN BROOM CYLINDER/AUGER/ SHOP SUPPLIES/REPAIR CRACK FILLER-FLEET SERVICES-PARK MAINTENANCE. 36054 MAIL BOXES ETC POSTAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 64.59 36055 PAULETTE MARINI SERVICE-INSTRUCTOR SILK SCARK DYEING-39.00 SENIOR CENTER. 36056 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC SUPPLIES-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 301.24 36057 TRIA D MANN MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION. 60.76 36058 MATRX MEDICAL INC DISPOSABLE MASKS-FIRE DEPT. 26.09 36059 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC SERVICE-FLEET SERVICES. 90.00 36060 MAXI-PRINT INC LOST ANIMAL CARDS-POLICE DEPT. 53.25 36061 JANINE MCBRIDE PARKING FOR TAX COURT-ASSESSING DEPT. 42.00 36062 MCFARLANDS INC TRAP ROCK-WELL HOUSE 11. 612.00 36063 CAROLE MCMONIGAH ENTERTAINMENT-GRANT PAYMENT. 125.00 36064 MENARDS ELBOWS/COUPLINGS/STUDS/GREEN TREAT/OAK 722.68 VENEER/HINGES/SANDPAPER/BAR BURNER/BITS/ LAG SHIELD/STRIPPER/PREMIXED CONCRETE/ PAINT THINNER/LINE MARKER/PREMIXED MORTER/ ADHESIVE/TWINE/CONSTRUCTION LABOR/ SCREWDRIVERS/INSECT REPELLANT/BATTERIES- PARKS-STREETS-POLICE/11162. 15939921 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 9. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 36065 METALS JOINING LAB INC ALUMINUM TRUCK RACK/ALUMINUM BRACKET/ STEEL RINGS-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 36066 36067 36068 36069 36070 36071 36072 36073 METRO SALES INC METER BILLING/TONER-CITY HALL. METROPOLITAN AREA PROMOTIONS COMP ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS MICROGRAPHIC READER/PRINTER-CITY HALL. MIV AMERICA PLASTICS RED BRUSHING/ADAPTER/DAUBER/BALL VALVE- MIDAS BRAKE & MUFFLER MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS UTILITIES DIVISION. PIPES/MUFFLERS/CLAMPS-FLEET SERVICES. STEEL-FLEET SERVICES. ASPHALT-STREET DEPT/PARK MAINTENANCE. OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT/ 322312. VI 36074 36075 36076 36077 36078 36079 MINNEAPOLIS SPRING AND BODY BUILD AND INSTALL TAG AXEL-FLEET SERVICES. MINNCOMM PAGING PAGING SERVICE-SEWERDEPT/WATER DEPT. MINNEGASCO SERVICE. MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REALTOR DUES-ASSESSING DEPT. MINNEAPOLIS SPRING AND BODY ALIGN TAG AXLE-FLEET SERVICES. MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS BUSINESS CARDS/ACCIDENT REPORTS/PURCHASE ORDER FORMS-CITY HALL. 36080 MINNESOTA CLE PUBLICATION-POLICE DEPT. 36081 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 36082 MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPO MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR 36083 MINNESOTA CONWAY CONSTRUCTION PUBLICATION. RECHARGE FIRE EX-FIRE DEPT OPEN HOUSE RECHARGE FIRE EX-SENIOR CENTER-SAFETY DEPT. 36084 MN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1996 BUYERS CARD-LIQUOR STORES. 36085 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY CAL DEPT OF LABOR ENGINEER LICENCE RENEWAL. 36086 MN DEPT OF REVENUE FUEL LICENSE RENEWAL. 36087 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORATION CONFERENCE-STREET DEPT. 36088 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT RESTOCK PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CYLINDER 36089 36090 36091 36092 36093 PIPE ADAPTER INVENTORY~ATER PLANT. MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP-UTILITIES DIVISION. MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY STACK BINS-UTILITIES DIVISION. MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURSES. MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERA SERVICE. MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC MOVE AND REPLANT TREES AT STARING LAKE AND WELLHOUSE 11. 36094 MOORE MEDICAL CORP HOSE/CASTER FORK-PARK MAINTENANCE-FLEET SERVICES. 36095 WM MUELLER & SONS INC GRAVEL/CONCRETE SAND/SAND-STREET DEPT- UTILITIES-PARK MAINTENANCE. 36096 36097 36098 NATL INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MGMT I PUBLICATIONS-FINANCE DEPT. NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES. WE NEAL SLATE CO INSTALLED SOUND TRANMISSION IN GARDEN 36099 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIB 36100 NOTHERN 36101 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A 4748293 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 ROOM-FACILITIES. SUPPLIES FOR RESALE-COMMUNITY CENTER CONCESSIONS. COLEMAN PORTABLE GENERATOR. PAYING AGENT FEES. 10. 774.68 1579.54 109.00 5032.75 132.72 196.19 178.38 5007.28 1674.54 5698.90 73.48 6559.63 79.00 150.00 637.75 68.00 17.68 190.00 384.49 60.00 30.00 25.00 25.00 6223.74 150.00 800.00 374.85 499.08 3040.00 90.04 1200.55 33.45 658.44 3940.00 1034.98 553.79 200.00 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 36102 THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL SUBCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT. 48.00 36103 OHLIN SALES INC SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 210.87 36104 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC CABLE/CLIP/D RING/PLIERS/DRILL HAMMER/ 787.74 WRENCH/SCREWDRIVER/JUMPER CABLES/HACKSAW/ TUBING CUTTER/VISE/KEY SET-UTILITIES DIVISION. 36105 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN FACSIMILE MACHINE-FLEET SERVICES. 890.27 36106 PAPCO JANITORIAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES-FACILITIES. 16.36 36107 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER CHEST X RAY-FIRE DEPT. 59.00 36108 PARKSIDE PRINTING INC FLYERS/NEWSLETTER-SENIOR CENTER. 812.72 36109 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC WATE'RMAIN AND SEWER REPAIR-UTILITIES 4650.50 DIVISION. 36110 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY CHECK PROTECTOR BAGS/POUCHES-POLICE DEPT. 146.30 36111 J C PENNEY UNIFORM EXPENSE-POLICE DEPT. 311.08 36112 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC PHYSICAL AND PYSCO EXAMS-HUMAN RESOUCES. 85.00 36113 PHONES PLUS HEADSET-FACILITIES. 288.62 36114 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO WHEEL-FLEET SERVICES. 161.33 36115 PLANNERS BOOK SERVICE SUBCRIPTIONS-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 6.00 36116 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE 3. 234.10 36117 PLANNER PADS INC SUPPLIES-FORESTRY DEPT. 33.45 36118 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT CO SEAL KIT/VALVES-WATER SYSTEM PLANT. 642.66 36119 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC CLOTHING-FIRE DEPT/ADULT RECREATION. 827.54 36120 PRACTITIONERS PUBLISHING COMPANY PUBLICATION-FINANCE DEPT. 91.00 36121 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 167.45 36122 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY MANHOLE TAPE/MANHOLE INSPECTION PICKS/ 603.84 MANHOLE RUBBER GASKETS-WATER DEPT. 36123 KATHLEEN PORTA MILEAGE-CITY HALL. 5.04 36124 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING FILM OUTPUT-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 409.01 SUPPLIES-ASSESSING DEPT. 36125 PREMIER PAPERS SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER. 105.08 36126 PRESSWORKS SIGNS-FIRE DEPT. 319.50 36127 PRINTERS SERVICE INC ICE KNIFE SHARP-COMMUNITY CENTER. 87.00 36128 PROFESSIONAL TURF INC REPAIRS-MILLER PARK. 205.03 36129 PROFESSIONAL TURF INC REPAIRS-MILLER PARK. 140.00 36130 JOHN PRZYMUS SUPPLIES-SUMMER GOLF LESSON PROGRAM. 1750.50 36131 QUALITY BUILDING SERVICES INC WINDOW CLEANING-FACILITIES. 133.13 36132 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC START CAPACITORS/WEAR RING/GUIDE BAR/ 2932.19 CHAIN/CLEVISES/SHOP SUPPLIES-UTILITIES DIVISION/ ' . 36133 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE. 953.82 36134 RADIO SHACK BATTERIES. 35.08 36135 RAGEN COMMUNICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICES PUBLICATION-COMMUNITY 139.00 SERVICES. 36136 RAINBOW FOODS MEETING EXPENSE-RECREATION DEPT. 37.22 36137 REVERE PRIMER/PAINT~ATER TREATMENT PLANT. 620.56 36138 RICOH CORPORATION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL. 1545.18 36139 RICHFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER TRIP-SENIOR CENTER. 366.30 36140 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED TOW BAR/PINTLE HOOK-FLEET SERVICES. 257.41 36141 RINK PROMOS INC SUPPLIES-YOUTH RECREATION. 539.85 36142 RINK SYSTEMS FILTER/OIL/SERVICE-ICE ARENA COMMUNITY 419.95 CENTER. 2207468 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 11. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 36143 RITZ CAMERA FILM/FILM DEVELOPING-CITY HALL/FORESTRY 160.87 DEPT/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 36144 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION CHARGES-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 12.15 36145 ROBBINSDALE FARM GARDEN PET SUPPL DOG FOOD-POLICE DEPT. 208.00 36146 ROLLINS OIL CO FUEL-FLEET SERVICES. 6484.14 36147 RUFF CUT WEED CUTTING-FORESTRY DEPT. 60.00 36148 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO SWITXH/KEY AND CYLINDER-FLEET SERVICES. 84.66 36149 GENZ RYAN REFUND-OVERPAYMENT ON PERMITS. 18.00 36150 SANCO INC SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER/FACILITIES. 1345.41 36151 S AND B MFT< r,j INC REPAIRS-ICE ARENA COMMUNITY CENTER. 180.88 36152 VOW OUT CHECK 0.00 36153 JACK SCHEPERS MILEAGE-LIQUOR STORE III. 91.00 36154 SEARS REPAIR STARTER-PARK MAINTENANCE. 32.96 36155 VIANA SCHEFF ENTERTAINMENT-GRANT PAYMENT. 250.00 36156 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR OUTREACH SERVICE 3RD QRT 1995. 3250.00 36157 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION MENBERSHIP DUES-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. 125.00 36158 CITY OF SHOREVIEW SUPPLEMEMENTAL MLC MEMBERSHIP ASSESSMENT 500.00 FOR 1995. 36159 SIGNUM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS SUPPLIES-STREET DEPT. 210.87 36160 SIWEK LUMBER AND MILLWORK LUMBER-PARK MAINTENANCE. 51.12 36161 W GORDON SMITH CO GREASE/PARTS AND SUPPLIES-FLEET 98.40 MAINTENANCE. 36162 PETER SMITH SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL-FEES PAID. 455.00 36163 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION TOOLS-UTILITIES DIVISION/STREET DEPT/ 889.91 FLEET SERVICES. 36164 SNYDER DRUG SUPPLIES-AQUATICS DEPT/POLICE DEPT. 60.21 36165 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY PAINT-UTILITIES DIVISION. 94.32 36166 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC EMPLOYMENT ADS-ICE ARENA/SECRETARIES/PARK 477 .40 MAINTENANCE/TELECOMMUNICATIONS/HEALTH AND FITNESS. 36167 SPS COMPANIES SUPPLIES-WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. 282.44 36168 STAR TRIBUNE PAPERS FOR RESALE. 26.28 36169 THE STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO SUPPLIES-UTILITIES. 334.31 36170 SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS SUBCRIPTION-UTILITIES DIVISION. 407.75 36171 STOREFRONT YOUTH ACTION PROJECT C YOUTH COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE 3RD 1287.50 QRT JULY-SEPT 95. 36172 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION REPAIR COOLER-LIQUOR STORE I. 198.62 36173 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT. 2019.91 36174 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET WASHER FLUID RES-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 7.26 36175 SYSTECH SOFTWARE/COMPUTER SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 492.25 36176 SYSTEMS CONTROL SERVICES INC RADIO-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 676.28 36177 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/895475/895510/ 602.81 895511/895515/895521. 36178 TARGET STORES GIFT CERTIFICATES-SAFETY DEPT/FRAMES-133.14 POLICE DEPT. 36179 LEEANN THIELMAN SERVICE-ATTENDANT-FEES PAID. 200.00 36180 TIMBE~ALL LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS-PIONEER PARK PARK 217 .00 MAINTENANCE. 36181 TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE REFINISH AND INSTALL NEW TAILGATE-FLEET 472.92 MAINTENANCE. 2249877 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 12. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 VI 36182 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP FAIR LABOR STANDARDS HANDBOOK-UTILITIES 238.00 DIVISION. 36183 JEANE THORNE INC SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER. 121.10 36184 TRACY/TRIPP FUELS FUEL-FLEET SERVICES. 4501.73 36185 TRUGREEN/CHEMLAWN LAWN SERVICE-FIRE STATION I II II AND 615.26 UTILITIES. 36186 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO C02/HELIUM/NITROGEN/OXYGEN-FLEET SERVICES/ 309.92 FIRE DEPT. 36187 UNITED LABORATORIES INC SUPPLIES-WATER DEPT. 174.00 36188 USPCI HIDDEN PONDS RESERVIOR COAL SLAG BLAST 2137.26 ABRASIVE WASTE DISPOSAL AND TESTING- UTILITIES DIVISION. 36189 US TOY CO INC DUCK POND FLOATERS-UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN. 361.23 36190 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-FIRE DEPT/POLICE DEPT. 339.20 36191 MICHELLE VEITH SERVICE-INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR CENTER. 39.00 36192 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHTING SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK 1047.00 MAINTENANCE. 36193 VWR SCIENTIFIC LAB SUPPLIES~ATER TREATMENT PLANT. 134.10 36194 WACONIA MARINA AND YAUGHT CLUB IN TRAILER RENTAL-STREET SERVICES. 255.60 36195 WATERPRO CORR PERF TUBE/BUSHING/TOUCHPADS/PIPE/ 4994.16 STEEL APRON/SPEEDCRETE/PRESSURE REGULATOR/ RENTAL TAPPING MACHINE/COIL SEAL/ROD SEAL/ CPLGS/CURB BOX/VALVE BOX-UTILITIES DIVISION/732355. 36196 WATER SPECIALTY OF MN-INC CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE/LIQUID CLORINE/ 638.97 WRENCH/VALVE/COUPLING-COMMUNITY CENTER. 36197 WATER SPECIALTIES REPAIRS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 217.89 36198 WEATHER WATCH INC OCT 95 WEATER SERVICE-STREET DEPT. 195.00 36199 SANDRA F WERTS MILEAGE/FIELD TRIP EXPENSES-SENIOR CENTER. 51.85 36200 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC-MPLS COOLER-COMMUNITY CENTER. 516.53 36201 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER MEDIATION SERVICE-THIRD QUARTER 1995. 625.00 36202 WEST WELD LINER-FLEET MAINTENANCE. 42.04 36203 JOEL WESTACOTT PRODUCTION SERVICE VIDEO SERVICES-CITY COUNCIL MEETING/ 394.63 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING/INDEPENDANT EDUCATION FORUM. 36204 BRADY AND STEPHANIE WILLETTE TEMPORARY EASEMENT/PERMANENT EASEMENT-1089.62 GOLDEN RIDGE DRIVE. 36205 DAVE WILLIAMS ENTERTAINMENT-GRANT PAYMENT. 125.00 36206 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SVCS INC SERVICES-PRAIRIE CENTER DR TEMP SIGNALS/ 795.00 HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC STUDY. 36207 THE WORK CONNECTION SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE. 2764.46 36208 WORKING FIRE SUBCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT. 220.00 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 09-29-95. 19754.94 22000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 10-13-95. 18407.05 55000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE SEPT SPECIAL FUEL TAX. 233.80 44000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE SEPT 95 SALES TAX. 42730.00 33000 COMMUNITY CENTER SEPT 95 JOURNAL ENTRIES. 0.00 33000 WATER METERS SEPT 95 JOURNAL ENTRIES. 0.00 11000 FIRST TRUST BOND PAYMENTS. 8740.00 11000 NORWEST BANKS BOND PAYMENTS. 181321.25 29413059 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 13. NOVEMBER 7, 1995 11000 AMERICAN BANK 19237 VOID OUT CHECK 20957 VOID OUT CHECK 20967 VOID OUT CHECK 22218 VOID OUT CHECK 23410 VOID OUT CHECK 23920 VOID OUT CHECK 25993 VOID OUT CHECK 27357 VOID OUT CHECK 28890 VOID OUT CHECK 30031 VOID OUT CHECK 33649 VOID OUT CHECK 34354 VOID OUT CHECK 35092 VOID OUT CHECK 35134 VOID OUT CHECK 35125 VOID OUT CHECK 35212 VOID OUT CHECK 35593 VOID OUT CHECK 35617 VOID OUT CHECK 35628 VOID OUT CHECK 35641 VOID OUT CHECK 35666 VOID OUT CHECK 35670 VOID OUT CHECK 35680 VOID OUT CHECK 35700 VOID OUT CHECK 35779 VOID OUT CHECK -600477 NOVEMBER 7, 1995 BOND PAYMENT. 14. VI 75925.00 12.03- 10.00- 4.00- 18.00- 23.00- 21.00- 20.00- 3.00- 19.00- 3.00- 209.80- 100.00- 12582.00- 63384.30- 487.25- 937.99- 1009.99- 58.04- 381.76- 65.41- 520.50- 46.00- 1550.42- 463.28- 0.00 $1496160.98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-7-95 SECTION: REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS IX. ·A ITEM NO. DEP ARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger 2nd Quarterly Report -Senior Issues Task Force Jean Johnson Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Receive 2nd Quarterly Report; • Forward comments/suggestions back to Task Force if necessary. Background: Task Force is researching the needs of Eden Prairie's senior population in +2015 -2020. Supporting Reports: 2nd Quarterly Report -dated November 1, 1995. IY.-A -I :MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Senior Issues Task Force DATE: November 1, 1995 SUBJECT: Second Quarterly Report of the Task Force In its charge to the Senior Issues Task Force (SITF), the City Council requested quarterly reports to the Council. This second report describes some of the work· of the Task Force thus far, and indicates what it anticipates for coming months. 1. Commission staffin& and membership: With the departure of Craig Dawson, who previously provided staff support for SITF, Jean Johnson from Community Planning has been designated staff support. The membership of the Task Force continues to include Melissa Beckmann, Dick Brown, Barbara Buehl, Marvin Cofer, Bill Jackson, Pat Nash, and Sandy Werts with Ron Case and Bette Anderson sharing the chair. 2. SITF Structure and Processes: The Task Force has chosen to divide its work at this point into two general topics: demographics and human service issues. It is anticipated that during the next few months these sub-groups will meet separately once a month and that the whole group will meet at a second meeting. The demographics group is attempting to better define the size and probable age of the senior population in the year 2020 and the infrastructure needed to serve their needs. The human services group has divided itself still further to become informed in these general areas: • Illness/Disability; • Frail Elderly Issues: independent living/access to services/opportunities; • Housing Issues; • Socialization/Personal growth; • Financial Planning/Financial Assistance. 3. Recent SITF Activity: Guest speakers since the last quarterly report include Mike Munson, planner/demographer with the Metropolitan Council, speaking primarily to the demographics issues; Sandy Miller and Peg Kamholz from Senior Outreach addressing frail elderly issues; and Adele Metha from Senior Community Services, the parent organization of Senior Outreach, speaking about the broader picture of senior issues and services. IL-A -~ Senior Issues Task Force Quarterly Report November 1, 1995 Page 2 Individuals from the Task Force have worked independently and have reported on their reading, activities and site visits. In this way, we have learned about senior housing activity in nearby communities; changing processes and priorities at Hennepin County through an interview with Wayne Takashita, head of Adult Services; and about resources available to help persons become informed about resources available to meet their needs. Visitors from the community have participated to a limited degree and shared their professional insights. 4. Impressions Thus Far: While work continues to build on the base of information gathered so far, some tentative conclusions are emerging. a. Preliminary estimates suggest that the senior age population, conservatively set at 65 +, will match or exceed the school age population by the year 2020. b. A mix of housing types and prices that include lower cost homes on a single level that include 3/4 baths -i.e. baths with a walk-in shower rather than a tub/shower, will best accommodate older citizens and let them age in place. c. Experience shows that if seniors are still in their homes at age 58, they are to stay as long as they can afford it. d. Although it would be beneficial to consider the needs of the elderly in new housing proposals that come before the Council, it may be that some seniors will prefer to buy newer housing at retirement that will require less maintenance and take advantage of newer technologies and styles. e. Neighborhood convenience centers that can be reached by walking or by short drives are desired amenities and likely to be an asset to home values in aging neighborhoods. f. The Senior Center serves as one of the main sources for senior service information currently and that function is likely to expand. Its role as a provider should be considered in the development of the Family Services Collaborative information and service network. g. The current Senior Center will be outgrown before 2020 and should be considered in the long range city facilities planning. City Staff support will need to grow in relation to the Senior facilities growth. h. Availability of transportation, especially for the frail or those with disabilities, is currently a major problem in Eden Prairie and the magnitude of the problem is likely to increase. i. As new senior complexes are built, consideration could be given to negotiating broader community use of their vans, meeting rooms, etc. R-A -3 Senior Issues Task Force Quarterly Report November 1, 1995 Page 3 5. Task Force Future Activity Plans: The SITF believes it is necessary to better determine the plans and expectations of the baby boomers who will form the bulk of the senior population in 2020. The results of the city survey conducted this summer must be known in order to properly construct the questionnaire that will meet our needs so it has been a frustration to wait for those results to be prepared. A survey and focus groups of the current senior popUlation will provide useful information, but it is felt that a targeted survey sampling the plans and expectations of the 40 to 50 year old group will help the City better anticipate future needs and demands. It is anticipated that the Task Force will prepare a list of future senior needs and a second list of what role, if any, the City should play in addressing those needs. IK-A-LJ DATE: 1117195 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Report of City Manager DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Administration Family Services Collaborative Proposal XI.B.1. Requested Council Action: Motion for approval of Eden Prairie's participation in Phase 1 (through June of 1996) of the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative, including approval of Eden Prairie's in-kind contribution of 120 hours of staff time for Phase 1 implementation. Background: South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative (FSC) began in March of 1994 as part of a state-wide effort to promote collaboration and integrated service systems. The collaborative was created through a partnership between South Hennepin families, schools, cities, public health, Hennepin County, private human service providers, funders, and other community organizations serving families and children. The South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency (SHeRPA) is the lead coordinating agency for the collaborative effort. The collaborative effort in South Hennepin began with the task of studying the needs of families and children and developing a blueprint for an integrated service system. The studying of the issues and development of a blueprint took about a year to complete. This planning process was guided by a steering committee comprised of representatives from all of the partner organizations and involved over 300 people who contributed a combined of over 1600 volunteer hours to the collaborative planning process. Financial Implications: The proposed budget for Phase 1 of the FSC is $833,200. This amount includes State and private grants in the amount of $212,500. The balance consists of in-kind services from the participating organizations. Eden Prairie's commitment of in-kind services is proposed to be 120 hours of staff time. Subsequent phases for implementation of the FSC will not be recommended for approval without having identified ongoing revenue sources to replace the State grant monies which are intended to be a resource for start-up costs and short-term funding only. South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency for Human Services Bloomington 0 Eden Prairie 0 Edina 0 Richfield To: South Hennepin City Managers and Superintendents From: Jeanne Massey, SHeRPA Date: October 26, 1995 Re: Summary of the implementation grant proposal for presentation to city councils and school boards Enclosed is a summary version of the Family Services Collaborative implementation proposal to the State of Minnesota. It is not a two page executive summary, but rather an 8 page summary of the original proposal. My goal was to provide enough information to understand the scope and nature of the project. As discussed at the Interim FSC board meeting, each city council and school district is being asked to consider the following: 1. approval of the city's or school district's participation in phase one (through June of 1996) of the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative, and 2. approval ofthe organization's inkind contributions proposed for the first phase of implementation. Also enclosed is a copy of the implementation proposal with the revised work plan if you wish to copy it for distribution in addition to the summary. Please call me if you have any questions. I am also available to attend your city councilor school board presentations to respond to questions if that would be helpful to you. 5701 Normandale Road, Room 302, Edina. MN 55424 0 Tel: (612) 922-5999 Fax: (612) 922-3081 SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION GRANT PROPOSAL TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA BACKGROUND The services systems -be it health care, human services, employment and training, corrections or welfare -are undergoing significant change and restructuring, resulting in integrated service systems. Underlying some of these changes is the reduction in public funding for services that is forcing increased responsibilities on more local levels of government -county, city and school. These trends have made collaboration between organizations and communities more important than ever. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative began in March of 1994 as part of a statewide effort to promote collaboration and integrated service systems. The Collaborative was created through a partnership between South Hennepin families, schools, cities, public health, Hennepin County, private human service providers, funders, and other community organizations serving families and children. The South Hennepin Regional Planning Ag~ncy is the lead coordinating agency for the collaborative effort. The collaborative effort in South Hennepin began with the tasks of studying the needs of families and children and developing a blueprint for an integrated service system that is: • family focused and empowering for families; • comprehensive and provides a continuum of services; • community-based; • culturally relevant; • focused on prevention and early intervention; and • built on the strengths and resources of families and communities. The studying of the issues and development of a blueprint took a little over a year to complete (from March, 1994 to June, 1995). This planning process was guided by a Steering Committee comprised of representatives from all of the partner organizations and involved over 300 people, who contributed a combined total of over 1600 volunteer hours to the collaborative planning process. SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES There are an estimated 24,300 families with children in the four South Hennepin school . districts, with a total of over 43,700 children. Teachers and other front-line staff in schools estimate that a quarter to a third (or 6,000 -8,000) of their students are dealing with family South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 1 problems and may need some kind of assistance. Most, however, are not getting needed supports. All families raising children need support; it is simply too difficult for families to rear children alone. Sometimes this support comes from a natural support network of friends, relatives, or neighbors; and sometimes it comes from more formal supports such as social services. Our families are in the process of rapid change. Lifestyle choices, work place and household structure and family norms all are undergoing transformation. There has also been a corresponding transformation in the community-and family-based social support systems and Institutions. Supports for families are fragmented and the lack of a natural support network can be harmful for parents who are isolated and overrun by a multitude of stresses. There are four fundamental problems limiting or preventing families from getting the supports they need. D First, families and providers or other people who are trying to help families often face tremendous difficulties in finding and connecting with needed services. o Second, because potential problems are more difficult to recognize in the early stages of development than in the later stages, those which could have been averted or alleviated by early intervention often go unnoticed until they escalate in seriousness. o Third, once families and children do get connected to the services they need, these services are often fragmented and inflexible and, therefore, not able to meet the needs of families and children in a holistic manner. Families must often go to several different service providers each of which attempts to treat one piece of the family's problems. While many good services are in place, fragmentation makes them less effective and efficient than they could be -this is why service collaboration is so important. o Finally, services are often provided in isolation from families' natural support network, limiting the strength of support a family might need. The inherent nature of the problems identified require solutions that address the fundamental design of the service system and that are collaborative in nature. Because services are fragmented and families receive support from more than one organization, collaboration must occur between all organizations serving families -schools, public health, county, city and community-based services. Because families live, work, go to school and socialize in more than one community, collaboration must also occur between communities. The South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative is proposing a model for improving how services are delivered. The model is called the "South Hennepin Family Support Network", which is a family-focused system for integrated service delivery in South Hennepin. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 2 INITIAL PRIORITIES OF THE SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE The startup phase of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative will focus on three priorities 1) the development of the proposed South Hennepin Family Support Network, 2) the collaborative governance model of the Family Services Collaborative and 3) the localization and integration of Hennepin County services in South Hennepin. 1) The South Hennepin Family Support Network The proposed Family Support Network for South Hennepin families and children is designed to: l. 2. 3. 4. 5. systematically identify and deal with family problems as they emerge; increase access and simplify the process of linking families and children to needed supports; integrate these supports into a continuum of care that will result in a more holistic and successful resolution of these problems; and help families strengthen their natural support networks (e.g. relatives, friends, neighbors, religious organizations); provide a mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of integrated family services. The Family Support Network will be formed as a collaborative between cities, schools, Hennepin County, and private providers serving South Hennepin. It has two main components: ~ a Resource Center Network, and ~ a provider affiliation formed by a Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU). (Refer to diagram on next page) The Resource Center Network. The Resource Center Network will be an interconnected group of up to four local Resource Centers, where families can go or call to get connected to needed supports, and which offers a coordinated approach to addressing family issues. The local Resource Centers will be responsible for 1) being the access point for a full range of information about available community and metropolitan resources, 2) simplifying access to services, 3) providing broad-based family assessment, 4) making referrals to a full range of supports within the community, not only traditional family services, and 5) initiating service coordination among family service providers and community supports when needed. The four centers will be linked and supported through a Support Hub, which provides the coordination of services that are more cost-efficient when done on a regional basis. These components include the service and clients information systems, common intake processes, training, specialty services such as crisis hotlines, evaluation design, and seeking funding. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 3 ~ lit S. ~ ~ ;:;. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1';' Dl Q t= ~ i:1 ... j' ~ ~ ~ ~ s. '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i:t ... c· ~ C) i:1 ~ ... ~ .g o il: "- ~ [ ::: a. ~ ..... '" ~ '" .j:>.. SOUTH HENNEPIN FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK Affiliation of Providers Organized Through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) The MOU is an interagency agreement in which family service providers would partiCipate. The agreement would specify guidelines and procedures for: 1. Identifying and responding to potential family problems early. 2. Taking a lead role in coordinating services for a limited number of families, including ongoing assessment, referral, and follow-up . 3. Cooperating in service teams coordinated by other organizations. 4. Forming a working partnership with the Resource Center Network for assistance with information, intake, assessment, referrals, and follow-up. .. : / \ / all \ all \ / \ / \ \ , II \ 0\ / \ I 0 , \ / ~~~--" I / \ / -, ", ,II 0' ---0 -----" : "0/ ! \ ' , " _' :' "0 I -I / ~ - ----. - - -/ : '-/ -',: --, "" 0/ ,\ \, I' 0/ -----0 --------o' """ : """"0\ 1/11 \ , ,\ / \ " I, I \ " I' I \ I \, :', I -, \ I \ " / " \ \ \ " \ -, 0\ \ ~ \ / \ ' Bloomingto' Resource '. Center / ~ ~ \\ \ Eden Prairie Resource Center Edina Resource Center Resource Center Support Hub \ \ \ Richfield Resource '. Center / I / / The Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU). A Memorandum Of Understanding will be established among the local Resource Centers and community organizations, and would be an agreement to work collaboratively to 1) systematically identify and respond to family problems early, 2) integrate services for families in need of multiple supports and 3) strengthen families' natural support systems, and 4) evaluate service effectiveness. The anticipated benefits and outcomes of the Family Support Network are the following: 1. Save farpilies and providers time in finding appropriate services and increase access to services. 2. Increase the likelihood that problems are addressed as they emerge, with the goal of reducing the long-term need for later intervention. 3. Improve the integration of services for families in need of multiple supports. 4. Reduce the number of times a family has to tell its story and the amount of time providers spend repeating similar intake processes. 5. Reduce the number of families who are unable to connect with the supports they need. 6. Strengthen family supports. 7. Increase the ability to evaluate the success of serving families. 8. Provide the ability to identify gaps in services. 9. Save costs in the service system. 10. Increase the availability and accessibility of county and other services presently not easily accessible to South Hennepin residents. 2) The Goyernance Model of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative The Family Support Network and other components of the Family Services Collaborative will require the ongoing support and leadership of the South Hennepin communities, at both the local and regional levels. The Family Services Collaborative has proposed that: One, Community Councils be established in each South Hennepin community, comprised of representatives of the schools, cities, public health service providers, human service providers, residents, customers of services, local foundations, civic and religious organizations, local businesses and other key stakeholders. The function of the Community Councils will be to bring together all of the organizations serving families and children to jointly facilitate the implementation of the Family Services Collaborative at the local level. Where possible, the Community Councils would be established through expanding existing community-based advisory and citizen groups. Each South Hennepin community will decide how its Community Council would be formed and structured. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 5 Two, a South Hennepin Family Services Council be established to support local activities and to provide a vehicle to work together. The South Hennepin Family Services Council would allow representatives of local communities to work with their counterparts in the other South Hennepin communities and with Hennepin County to determine the common priorities which can be more efficiently addressed on a regional or subregional basis. It is proposed that the Family Services Council be formed by expanding the existing joint powers agreement between the four South Hennepin cities (i.e. South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency) to include the ongoing participation of the schools and Hennepin County, rather than by creating a new entity. The anticipated benefits and outcomes of the collaborative governance structure and process include the following: 1. Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of collaborative efforts at the local and regional (South Hennepin) levels. 2. Help ensure the successful implementation of the Family Support Network and other recommendations. 3. Improve communication and build relationships across family serving institutions and COmmUllltles. 4. Develop a stronger and ongoing partnership between the South Hennepin communities and Hennepin County. 5. Provide a local decision making structure for the delivery of family services. 3) Localization and Integration of County Services in South Hennepin. A third primary area of focus of the collaborative effort during the first year of implementation is to work with Hennepin County to make its services more accessible locally and integrated with South Hennepin service providers. The proposed South Family Support Network would serve as a central vehicle for the four South Hennepin communities to work with Hennepin County and other providers in their efforts to decentralize and integrate services in South Hennepin. EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS Ongoing evaluation will be the primary means of continuously assessing the effectiveness of the Family Support Network system. Three key areas of the collaborative effort will be evaluated: 1) effectiveness and quality, 2) customer satisfaction, and 3) collaborative service delivery. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 6 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS Roles and responsibilities are outlined for the primary partner organizations of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative: the South Hennepin school districts and city governments, the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency, Hennepin County, and community-based health and human service providers. Each partner organization is asked to become a member of the Family Support Network, assisting in its development and, upon agreement among the partners, reallocate staff and/ or other existing resources to support its activities. Participation in the Memorandum Of Understanding will require reorientation of some staff hours to lead and/or participate in family support teams. . In addition to participation in the Family Support Network, each partner organization is asked to participate in and support its respective Community Council and the South Hennepin Family Services Council. IMPLEMENTATION FUNDING AND BUDGET FOR THE FIRST YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION An underlying assumption of the Family Services Collaborative model is that there will not be significant ongoing new dollars to support it or other service redesign models. Moreover, the Family Services Collaborative considers implementation grants from the State of Minnesota to be a resource for startup costs and short-term funding. Efforts to redesign how services are provided will be accomplished primarily through reallocating and pooling existing resources among partner organizations. As such, the partners of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative are committing significant resources from their existing operations for the short-and long-term success of the Collaborative. The initial resource commitments of the collaborative partners for implementation of the F~ily Services Collaborative blueprint total $645,744. (The full implementation proposal includes a breakdown of the inkind resources from the various partner organizations.) The Family Services Collaborative is requesting $187,000 from the State of Minnesota for first-year implementation to supplement the resources of the collaborative partners. The implementation funds from the State of Minnesota represent approximately a third of the total potential resources of the Collaborative during the upcoming work plan period. (Refer to attached budget.) While the initial resource contributions of the collaborative partners are significant, we also recognize the need to develop creative funding strategies to sustain the Collaborative in the long term. For this reason, the first year work plan includes the development of long-term funding strategies. South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implementation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 7 BUDGET The following is a breakdown of projected revenues and expenses for the first year work plan period. It shows the grant and inkind resources anticipated from both the State of Minnesota and the partner organizations. As stated previously, the actual resource contributions made by the partner organizations during the first year work plan period may differ from the projected contributions depending on the actual progress made in the development of the Family Support Network. PARTNER RESOURCES FSCGRANT GRANTS INKIND TOTAL REVENUES State ofMN $187,500 $187,500 School districts $117,790 $117,790 Cities $112,318 $112,318 Public Health $17,460 $17,460 SHeRPA $42,458 $42,458 Hennepin County $246,596 $246,596 Private providers $25,000 $84,122 $109,122 TOTAL INCOME $187,500 $25,000 $620,744 $833,244 EXPENSES Staff $124,800 $530,236 $655,036 Salaries $99,840 Benefitsltaxes $24,960 Contracted services $30,000 $2,950 $32,950 Employee in-state travel $864 $864 Computers, phone, fax equipment $16,100 $10,350 $26,450 Space and furniture $31,942 $31,942 Materials, supplies, copying, postage $11,386 $2,466 $13,852 Resource library $41,500 . $41,500 Other $4,350 $25,000 $1,300 $30,650 TOTAL EXPENSES $187,500 $25,000 $620,744 $833,244 INCOME -EXPENSES $0 $0 $0 $0 South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative, Summary of the Implemenation Grant Proposal Submitted 9/15/95 8 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 1117/95 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO. X/.C'I DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Arts Center Status Recreation and Facilities Robert A. Lambert ~ BACKGROUND: The Arts Center Board of Directors has indicated a strong interest in being able to lease the police building on Mitchell Road for a minimum of a one-year period, and preferably at least two years. The City has been marketing this building for sale and during the time the City was negotiating a lease agreement with the Arts Center Board of Directors, City staff learned there was an individual extremely interested in acquiring that building. Although, the Arts Board is well aware that the City is continuing negotiations with this individual, City staff have developed a lease agreement that is agreeable to the Arts Board and City staff, provided negotiations fall through with the pending buyer. The City has requested the buyer provide a letter of intent (including the price) no later than the November 7 Council meeting. As of this writing, staff have been told the letter of intent will be delivered on November 6. SUMMARY OF ARTS CENTER AGREEMENT: The agreement would guarantee the Arts Center Board use of the police building for period of at least one year and would require the City to give a 90-day notice. The City could give a 90-day notice nine months into the agreement. The Arts Board would agree that it would provide an arts program that is described in their proposal. They are also agreeing to pay $500/month for utilities. With the $500/month payment by the Arts Board, the City would be subsidizing the gas and electric utilities approximately $600-$700/month. The City is not obligated to pay for any changes to the building required by the Arts Board and the City will have to approve any alterations, additions, or improvements to the property. The Arts Board will have the right to use only the upper level of this facility during this lease period. RECOMMENDATION: The rationale for the City to provide a private Arts Board use of this public facility and to subsidize a portion of the utility cost is the same rationale the City uses to provide athletic fields for various athletic associations. The City believes private groups providing programs and services in the arts is just as important as providing youth athletic or other healthy forms of recreation for our citizens. The original intent of the "two-year trial program" was to determine the demand and needs of the citizens for various programs in the arts and to determine if a private Arts Board could provide these services and programs without a City subsidy. . 1 City staff continue to strongly support the concept of a private Arts Board providing these services; however, if the City is able to sell the police building at or near the list price for the building) staff believe the City would be wise to take the offer. If the offer is not close to the asking price staff would recommend the City not actively pursue the sale of the building for next two-year period and enter into a lease agreement with the Arts Board for use of that facility. Staff have also recommended the Arts Board investigate a possible use of space at the Eden Prairie Center and review the Riley-Jacques Homestead site as a possible interim Arts Center. Mr .. Pauly will be in attendance at the November 7 meeting to answer any questions Councilmembers may have regarding the proposed lease agreement and Mr. Jullie will be prepared to make a recommendation to the City Council based on the letter of intent that will arrive November 6. BL:mdd ACStatus/Bob2 2 ----------------------------------------------- ARTS CENTER AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of the day of ___ ~ ____ , 1995, by and between the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), and Staring Art Center, Inc., a Minnesota non-profit corporation (hereinafter " Staring" ) . RECITALS: A. Staring is a Minnesota non-profit corporation and is a non-profit organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes §471.16. B. The purposes of Staring set forth in its Articles of Incorporation include the initiating and promoting of educational experiences in the arts, through productions and distribution of information in the literary, visual, and performing art fields, but not limited to these art fields, for the betterment of the community of Eden Prairie and its environs. C. Staring desires to operate a recreational program involving the arts as described herein in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein ("Arts Program") . D. City desires to cooperate with Staring, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §471.16, in Staring's operation of the Arts Program in accordance with the terms and conditions contained herein. 1. PREMISES 1.1 City leases and rents to Staring and Staring rents and takes from City for and during the lease term provided herein the land located at 7900 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and further described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, together with the improvements on the land, formerly occupied by City's police department (the "building"), and the parking facilities associated therewith, all of which is hereafter known as the "real property," provided however, there is excluded from and reserved by City that part of the real property described in Section 1.2(a) hereof, and the use of a part thereof during the times described in Section 1.2(b), all of which, with the exception of that part, and the use of a part during the times described, is excepted and reserved, is hereafter referred to as the "Leased Premises." 1.2 Exceptions and Reservations. (a) City excepts from and reserves to itself the lower level of the building in which is contained the City's 911 radio system, the radio tower and all other communications equipment, wherever located on or in the real property, together with the right of access thereto at all times whether by or through the Leased Premises or otherwise. (b) (Use of space by PROP from November 27 through December 27, 1995 to be added.) 1.3 Inspection -Condition of Premises. Staring acknowledges that it has inspected the Leased Premises and is familiar with its condition including, but not limited to, the accumulation of moisture condensate in or into a portion of the building from time to time. Staring further acknowledges that it takes the Leased Premises in an "as is" condition and that City has no obligation to replace, repair or rebuild any portion thereof, except as specifically provided herein. 1.4 Use of Premises. Staring shall use and occupy the Leased Premises solely for the Arts Program. No other use is authorized without the prior written consent of City. 1.4(a) Parking Areas. Staring shall not use the parking areas for overnight storage of automobiles or other vehicles, nor permit its employees or invitees to do so without permission of City. 1.4(b) No Unlawful Uses. Staring will not use, occupy or permit the Leased Premises or any part thereof to be used or occupied for any unlawful or illegal business, use or purpose, nor for any business, use or purpose deemed by City to be extra- hazardous, nor in such manner as to constitute a nuisance of any kind, nor for any purpose or in any way in violation of any present or future laws, rules, requirements, orders, directions, ordinances or regulations of the United States of America, or the State, county or city government, or other municipal, governmental or lawful authority whatsoever, including, but not limited to those relating to safety, and shall indemnify and hold City harmless from the consequences of any such violation. If Staring receives any notice of any such violation, applicable to the Leased Premises, it shall give prompt notice thereof to City. 1.4(c) Hazardous Uses. Staring will not conduct or permit to be conducted any activity or place any equipment in or about the Leased Premises, which will in any way increase the rate of fire insurance or other insurance on the building; and if any increase in the rate of fire insurance or other insurance is stated by any insurance company or by the applicable Insurance Rating Bureau to be due to activity or equipment of Staring in or about -'-/-- the Leased Premises, such statement shall be conclusive evidence that such increase in such rate is due to such activity or equipment. In such event, City shall have the option, exercisable in its sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement or to require Staring to pay to City the increase in the rate of such insurance attributable to such activity or equipment of Staring and Staring shall pay such amount to City upon demand therefor. 1.4{d) No Hazardous Substances or Materials. Staring shall not bring or place or cause to be brought or placed in or upon the Leased Premises any hazardous substances and shall conduct on the Leased Premises no activity that would cause or contribute to (i) the Leased Premises becoming a treatment, storage or disposal facility within the meaning of, or otherwise bring the Leased Premises within the ambit of, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), 42 u. S.C. §6901 et .2.§.g., or any similar state law or local ordinance, (ii) a release or threatened release of toxic or hazardous wastes or substances, pollutants or contaminants, from the Leased Premises within the meaning of, or otherwise bring the Leased Premises within the ambit of, CERCLA, or any similar state law or local ordinance, or (iii ) the discharge of pollutants or effluents into any water source or system, or the discharge into the air of any emissions, that would require a permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et .2.§.g., or the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et .2.§.g., or any similar state law or local ordinance. 1.4{e) Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (i) "Environmental Law" means any federal, state, county, municipal, local or other statute, law, ordinance or regulation which may relate to or deal with human health or the environment. (ii) "Hazardous Substances" means asbestos, ureaformaldehyde, polychlorinated byphenyls (" PCBs") , nuclear fuel or material, chemical waste, radioactive material, explosives, known carcinogens, petroleum products and byproducts and other dangerous, toxic or hazardous pollutants, contaminants, chemicals, materials or substances listed or identified in, or regulated by, any Environmental Law. With respect to the Property, Hazardous Substances also means any pollutants, contaminants, chemicals, materials or substances listed, identified in or regulated by any -s- Environmental Law as may be from time to time amended. 1.4 (f) Landlord's Rules and Regulations. Staring, its officers, employees, agents and invitees, shall observe and comply with all reasonable rules and regulations governing the building and the parking facilities as may be determined from time to time in writing by City for the general safety, comfort and convenience of Staring, City and the general public. Any failure to observe any such rule or regulation shall constitute failure to perform a term of this Agreement and, consequently, a breach of this Agreement. 2 • LEASE TERM Subject to City's right to terminate as hereinafter provided the lease term shall commence November 1, 1995, and end on December 31, 1997 (the "Lease Term"). 3. CONSIDERATION FOR USE AND OCCUPANCY OF LEASED PREMISES The consideration for the use and occupancy of the Leased Premises by Staring shall consist of the promises and the performance of the obligations by Staring as provided herein. 4. STARING'S ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS 4.1 Arts Program. Staring shall operate and provide for public use the Arts Program, described in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4.2 Utilities. Staring shall be responsible for securing and paying for all garbage and waste removal, custodial services and supplies, telephone and alarm systems, used or generated in or from the Leased Premises, as well as gas and electric utilities and maintenance as provided herein. 5. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS 5.1 City shall maintain the grounds and parking area situated on the premises, including the removal of snow from the parking areas, the cutting of grass and maintenance of shrubs on the exterior berm to the extent of and at the present level and quality of maintenance. 5.2 City shall also provide water and sewer services to the Leased Premises and shall provide such maintenance and repair of the Leased Premises as provided herein. 6. GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES Staring shall pay to City for gas and electric utilities furnished to the building the sum of Five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($500.00) on or before the 10th day of November, 1995 and a like amount on or before the 10th day of each month thereafter during the term hereof. 7. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS 7.1 City's Obligations. Except as damage or inj ury to the Leased Premises has been caused by Staring, and except the leakage of water into a portion of the building, whether through the roof or otherwise, City shall maintain and repair the roof and exterior, including replacement of exterior glass, of the building and shall repair or replace the heating, ventilating and cooling ("HVAC") systems in the event that the cost of repair of the HVAC system(s) shall exceed $500.00. 7.2 Staring'S Obligations. Staring, all at Staring's own cost and expense, shall keep the Leased Premises, including the HVAC systems, in a neat, clean and sanitary condition, and in as good order and repair as of the time Staring took possession of the same, except as to (a) reasonable wear and tear, (b) damage from fire or other casualty for which insurance proceeds are available to City, and (c) the extent City is obligated to repair the building. All damage or injury to the Leased Premises and to its fixtures, appurtenances and equipment, if not covered by fire and extended coverage insurance, caused by (i) Staring moving property in or out of the Leased Premises, however caused, or (ii) by installation or removal of furniture, fixtures or other property, however caused, or (iii) fire, explosion, short circuits, flow or leakage of water, stearn, gas, sewage or odors or by frost or by bursting or leaking of pipes or plumbing works, or other cause if due to negligence or willful conduct of Staring, its servants, employees, agent, visitors, or licensees, shall be repaired, restored or replaced promptly by Staring at-is sole cost and expense to the satisfaction of City. All aforesaid repairs, restorations, and replacements shall be in quality and class equal to the original work or installations and shall be done in a good and worker-like manner. If Staring fails to promptly make such repairs, restorations or replacements, the same may be made by City at the expense of Staring. If City makes such repairs, City will not be responsible to Staring for any loss or damage that may accrue to Staring's property or business by reason of making the repairs and all sums so spent and expenses incurred by City, less any insurance proceeds received by City, shall be paid to City by Staring within ten (10) days after delivery of a bill or statement therefor. -1- 8. ALTERATIONS BY STARING. 8.1 Consent Required. Staring will not make any alterations, additions or improvements to the Leased Premises without first obtaining the prior written consent of City as to the character of such alterations, additions or improvements and the manner of doing the work, which consent may be withheld. If any alteration, decoration, addition or improvement is made without the prior written consent of City, City may correct or remove the same and Staring shall be liable for any and all expenses incurred by City in the performance of this work. Staring shall obtain, at its own cost, all necessary permits and licenses. City consents to the alterations, additions and improvements by Staring at Staring's cost and expense described in Exhibit C attached hereto. 8.2 Quality of Work. Staring agrees that all work shall be done in a good and workmanlike manner, in conformance with all municipal and other government codes and that the structural integrity of the building shall not be impaired. 8.3 Restoration to Original Condition/Ownership. All alterations, decorations, additions, improvements and all fixtures and equipment attached to, or built into, the Leased Premises, whether by City at its own expense or at the expense of .Staring, or by Staring, shall remain as City's property and shall be surrendered with the Leased Premises as a part thereof, and shall not be removed by Staring at the end of the Lease Term or upon earlier termination of the Lease Term, unless otherwise agreed. However, if before termination or within fifteen (15) days after, City so directs by written notice, Staring shall promptly remove the aforesaid alterations, additions, and improvements made by Staring, which shall be designated in such notice, and Staring shall repair any damage caused by removal. Staring shall, however, remain the owner of any trade fixture installed by Staring and shall have the right to remove such trade fixture at the termination or expiration of the Lease Term, so long as Staring is not then in default and the Leased Premises are restored to the original condition. 8.4 Signs. Upon the written prior approval of City, Staring may, at its own risk and expense, place signs identifying itself and the arts program next to or on any doors opening directly into the Leased Premises, so long as all such signs conform with the City's building standards and criteria and with all applicable zoning laws. Staring agrees to maintain its signs in good repair, to remove its signs at the end of or upon prior termination of the Lease Term to repair any damage caused by such removal, and to hold City harmless from any loss, cost or damages resulting from the erection, existence, maintenance or removal of Staring's signs. City reserves the right to remove all unapproved signs at the expense of Staring. -Cj- 9 • INDEMNIFICATION 9.1 Staring to Indemnify. Staring shall hold City harmless from and indemnify City against any and all liability, damage, loss and expense arising or resulting from the acts or omissions of, or caused by, Staring or Staring'S employees, servants, agents, guests, assigns, visitors or invitees in, upon or about the Leased Premises, including all common areas or arising out of or related to the use and occupancy of the Leased Premises or the business or activities conducted with respect thereto, including injuries to persons and property. 9.2 Liens. Staring will not commit or suffer any act or neglect whereby the Leased Premises or any part of the Real Property will become subject to any attachment, judgement, lien, charge or encumbrance whatsoever, and will indemnify and hold City harmless from all loss, cost and expense with respect to such encumbrance. If Staring shall fail to discharge any such lien within ten (10) days after notice from City, City may, at its option, discharge the same and treat the cost thereof, plus interest thereon at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum, as additional rent payable upon demand by City. 10. STARING'S INSURANCE 10.1 General Liability Insurance. Staring shall provide and keep in effect during the Lease Term liability insurance protection for personal injury and property damage claims in amounts of not less than $1,000,000.00 per person and $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. Staring shall have City named as an additional insured on its liability policies. 10.2 Contents. Staring shall obtain and keep in effect during the term of this Agreement the broadest coverage form of insurance reasonably available against loss through casualty, theft or otherwise of its property. 10.3 -Worker's Compensation. Staring shall provide worker's compensation coverage. 10.4 General Provisions. Each policy of insurance required by Staring shall provide that it shall not be cancelled or not renewed without 30 days prior written notice thereof to City. Within ten (10) days of the effective date hereof Staring shall provide to City evidence that there are in effect policies of insurance providing the coverages specified herein. 11. SUBROGATION WAIVER Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, City and Staring hereby release each other from any and all liability or responsibility to the other or anyone claiming -9- through or under them by way of subrogation or otherwise for any loss or damage to person or property where and to the extent such loss or damage is insured against under any insurance policy, even if such loss or damage shall have been caused by the fault or negligence of the other party, or anyone for whom such party may be responsible. City and Staring each agree that its insurance policies will include such a clause or endorsement so long as the same shall be available without cost. In the event such a provision is not available without cost, the released party shall pay the cost thereof to the releasing party. 12. CITY'S RIGHT OF ENTRY 12.1 For Inspection. City and City's agents and representatives shall have the right to enter into or upon the Leased Premises, or any part thereof at all reasonable hours upon reasonable notice for the purpose of examining the same. 12.2 For Repairs. City and City's agents shall have the right to enter the Leased Premises at all times upon reasonable notice, except in emergencies, and then without notice, to make such alterations, improvements, repairs or additions to pipes, ducts and conduits or other machinery or equipment of City, or make such other alterations, improvements, repairs or additions as City may deem necessary or desirable, and to take all material into and upon the Leased Premises as may be required for any such purposes without the same constituting an eviction of Staring in whole or in part. 12.3 To Show. It is City's intention to offer the Leased Premises for sale. Therefore, City shall have the right to enter the Leased Premises at all times upon reasonable notice to show the Leased Premises including, but not limited to, the interior of the Leased Premises to such person or persons and at such times as City deems necessary or desirable. 13. ASSIGNMENT -SUBLETTING Staring shall not assign this Agreement or any of its rights hereunder or sublet the Leased Premises in whole or in part without the prior written consent of City. 14. LOSS OR DAMAGE In the event of any loss or damage to the Leased Premises or any part thereof, regardless of the degree of damage, City shall have the absolute right in its discretion to determine whether or not it will repair, restore or replace the Leased Premises to the condition which existed prior to the damage or destruction or to any lesser extent or degree. Provided however, City shall within 30 days that City first becomes aware of such damage or destruction, notify Staring in writing that it elects not to repair -iO - the Leased Premises. In such event, Staring may terminate the Lease Term by written notice to City of its election to do so within 10 days after the giving of the notice by City to Staring that City will not repair the Leased Premises. Thereupon Staring shall vacate the Leased Premises and surrender the same to City on or before 30 days after giving of such notice. 15. CONDEMNATION If all or any portion of the Leased Premises is taken or condemned by any authority having the power of eminent domain, this Agreement shall immediately cease and terminate. In such event all compensation awarded for the taking including both the fee and the lease hold estate shall belong to and be the property of City and Staring hereby assigns all of its rights and interest (except as to relocation benefits) in any such amount to City. Any separate award made to Staring for relocation benefits pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §117.52 shall be Tenant's sole property. 16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS Staring is an independent contractor and nothing herein contained shall be construed to create the relationship of employer and employee, co-partnership, joint venture or principal and agent, between City and Staring. Staring shall at all times be free to exercise initiative, judgment and discretion as to how to best perform and provide its services and obligations hereunder. Staring acknowledges that none of its employees, agents or volunteers are entitled to receive any of the benefits received by City employees and are not eligible for worker'S or unemployment compensation benefits available to City employees. City shall not be responsible for or obligated to pay any charges, expenses or costs incurred by Staring in performance of any of Staring's obligations hereunder or arising out of Staring's operation of the Arts Program. 17. CITY'S RIGHT TO SELL LEASED PREMISES AND TERMINATION 17.1 City shall at all times during the term hereof have the unrestricted absolute right to sell the real property, including the Leased Premises at such time and upon such terms and conditions as City in its sole discretion may determine. In the event City enters into a sale agreement for sale of the real property, City may terminate this Agreement and the Lease Term at any time upon notice in writing to Staring that this Agreement shall terminate 90 days after the giving of such notice, provided however, such notice may not be given by City until nine (9) months after commencement of the Lease Term. 17.2 In the event City terminates the Lease Term pursuant to Section 17.1 hereof City shall make available for the remainder of the Lease Term to Staring a substitute facility as -1/ - City may determine upon such terms and conditions as are mutually agreeable to the parties. 18. DEFAULT Should Staring breach any of the terms of this Agreement, City shall give Staring written notice of such breach and Staring shall cure the same within thirty (30) days from the date of such notice. In the event Staring shall fail to do so, City may terminate this Agreement upon written notice. In such event Staring shall vacate the Leased Premises within 30 days after the giving of such notice. 19. TERMINATION 19.1 Expiration of Term. Unless otherwise renewed, extended or terminated, this Agreement and the Lease Term shall terminate on December 31, 1997. 19.2 Condition of Premises. On the last day of the Lease Term or on the sooner termination thereof, Staring shall peaceably surrender the Leased Premises broom-clean and in as good condition and repair as is required of it pursuant to Section 7.2 hereof. 19.3 Removal of Tenant's Property. If Staring shall vacate or surrender the Leased Premises without removing all of Staring's personal property and fixtures as agreed, City may, in City's sole discretion, elect to treat such property as having been abandoned by Staring and, in such event, Staring hereby authorizes City to dispose of such property without advance notice to Staring. Upon demand, Staring shall reimburse City for all such costs of disposal. 20. NOTIFICATION 20.1 Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given by any party upon the other is given in accordance with this Agreement if it is directed to Staring by delivering it personally to ; or if it is directed to City, by delivering it personally to an officer of City; or if mailed in a sealed wrapper by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid; or if transmitted by facsimile, copy followed by mailed notice as above required; or if deposited cost paid with a nationally re60gnized, reputable overnight courier, properly addressed as follows: If to Staring: -/~- If to City: City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attn: Carl Jullie Notices shall be deemed effective on the earlier of the date of receipt or the date of deposit as aforesaid; provided, however, that if notice is given by deposit, that the time for response to any notice by the other party shall commence to run one business day after any such deposit. Any party may change its address for the service of notice by giving written notice of such change to the other party, in any manner above specified, ten (10) days prior to the effective date of such change. 21. SURVIVAL OF OBLIGATIONS 21.1 Upon termination of this Agreement or the Lease Term the following obligations of Staring under this Agreement shall survive: 21.1(a) Payment of the amounts of costs incurred for all utilities and services described in Sections 4.2 and 6 hereof. 21.1(b) Obligations incurred to the date of cessation of occupancy of the Leased Premises by Staring pursuant to Section 7.2. 21.1(0) Obligations pursuant to Sections 8.3,8.4, 9.1, 9.2, 11, 19.2, 19.3, and 20. 21.1 (d) Any liability for which Staring is liable prior to cessation of occupancy or for which it could become liable pursuant to Section 1.4(d). 22. DAMAGE DEPOSIT Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Staring shall deposit with City the sum of $ or equivalent security in the form of a surety bond, irrevocable letter of credit or other security acceptable to City to secure the performance by Staring of its obligations pursuant to Sections 4.2, 6, 7.2, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, and 9.2 of this Agreement. Any equivalent security shall be in such form and contain such terms as are acceptable by City. 23. OPTION TO EXTEND TERM City shall give consideration (but not be bound) to extending this Agreement and the Lease Term for an additional term of years upon notice to City by Staring of its desire to do so on or before 90 days, but not more than 180 days, prior to -/3- December 31, 1997. In doing so, City may take into account the achievement of Staring of the goals and expectations of the Arts Program, the City's ability to provide facilities and funds to do so, and other matters deemed relevant by City's Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the dates indicated below. Dated: _____________ , 1995 Dated: _____________ , 1995 C:\wp51\rap\ep\arts\agreement STARING ART CENTER, INC. By Its CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By Jean Harris Its Mayor By Carl J. Jullie Its Manager Taxpayer I.D. #: 41-0855460 -/<1-- EXHIBIT B Arts Program The following outline is submitted as a suggest program plan. The focus of programming will be on the Staring Arts Board's interpretation of meeting the needs of the citizens in Eden Prairie, and will be talent and opportunity driven. The Staring Arts Board will determine what programs will occur, depending on financial support and other budget considerations. A. The Exhibition Program 1. The primary exhibition space will exhibit a variety of visual art shows depending on availability, with quality being foremost selection criteria. a. Media to include, but not limited to, oil painting, watercolor painting, drawing, sculpture, mixed media, photography, folk art, design, print making. b. A maximum of twelve (12) shows will be exhibited each year, a minimum of six (6). c. Solo shows, group exhibits and instructional shows will be offered depending on availability, funding and quality. Exhibits will be both sponsored and produced by the Art Center. B. The Performing Arts Program 1. Space limitations will determine kinds of performing arts events. 2. Programs for adults may include, but are not limited to, poetry and book readings, film or video productions, piano recitals, visual artist's talks. 3. Programs for children and adults may limited to, creative story telling, small vocal or instrumental demonstrations. include, but are not creative dramatics, groups, painting C. The Educational Program 1. Art classes for children and adults. Quality Time could be a title given to classes for a child and a parent, where the two can work as a team, or individually, to share the experience of making art. If these Quality Time classes are successful, other events and projects are possible. Bus trips to the Children's Theater, or other special events appealing to adults and children could be tried. -l5:"- 2. Programs just for children. a. Classes will be offered at three different levels: lower elementary, middle school age, and high school. Courses will be designed depending on the talent, expertise, and availability of qualified teachers. b. A special project for youth-at-risk will be explored. 3. Adult classes. Adult classes will offer a variety of offerings. Courses will be designed depending on the talent, expertise, and availability of qualified teachers. 4. General class information. a. Classes offered will depend on teachers, and on when proper equipment are available. availability of facilities and b. Class tuition will be competitive with other organizations in the City, and other art centers in the area. c. Class length will depend on the age of the students, and materials-topic of class. d. A special fund will be established to provide scholarships for needy students, regardless of age. It is possible some educational programs will be free, if funded through special grants. -/6 - EXHIBIT C Alterations 1. Put in a security system, especially around the gallery areas, and hook up the sound system, and intercom system. 2. Rework the present atrium, former office area, into gallery area. This will be the main "public" area and will run the length of the south side. It will include the main gallery, the gift shop, a children's gallery and room, and two spaces for public lectures, luncheons, and minor gallery space. a. Move the doorway into the former copy room, to the north wall, so it opens to the hallway. Sheet rock the entire west wall, covering up the existing doorway. (Special note: this is the only spot where concrete block walls are to be altered, and this wall is not an essential support wall.) b. Remove the yellow fluorescent lights in all gallery areas and replace with incandescent spot lights. (The lights attached to the north wall could remain, if the light shade was painted white.) c. Remove the fire extinguisher on the north wall, and move it to the reception room. Sheet rock the entire wall from the door to the reception room down to the door leading to the education wing. This will completely cover the door to the dispatch office, making it only accessible through the reception room. Change the large window in the dispatch office to a one-way viewing window, looking from the office out to the lobby, or hang blinds. d. Sheet rock the entire south wall covering the center three doors that lead to the small offices running along the south side. The sheet rock should extend up to the glass. e. In the room on the southeast corner, sheet rock over the concrete wall on north side, and over the wall on the west side which divided off the former copy room. On the west wall dividing up the offices, install double french doors. f. Cover all windows with white translucent shades, which filter ultra violet. g. Completely remove or cut a larger center opening in the walls dividing offices 1 and 2, 2 and 3. Put a lockable glass door on the right side of the wall dividing offices -/7- 3 and 4. Completely remove or cut a large center opening in the wall dividing offices 4 and 5. h. In the room on the southwest corner, completely remove the wall dividing the two rooms, sheet rock the east wall of the enlarged room. Remove the second entrance. 1. Put lock on door leading to education wing. j . Remove carpet from one of the smallest rooms in the staff area and cut it as necessary to "patch" carpet in public exhibition area. 3. Improvements to the education wing. This area runs from the men's locker room down the west side to the former evidence room. It contains the men's and women's locker rooms, a carpeted classroom with projector room, a kitchen-dining room, a darkroom, a non-carpeted classroom, and a coat room across the hall. a. It is essential that a new lock be installed at the rear entrance so this wing can be utilized with other parts of the building are not open, and a key can be checked out to teachers. It would be most desirable that a more inviting, glass door replace the present door. b. Install a large utility sink and counter in the darkroom. 4. Remove the glass from the lobby -reception desk. It appears the bullet proof glass is screwed in, and it would be impossible to remove the screws and slip the glass out. This would leave a nice counter, that opens up the space and makes it more inviting. . 5. Remove Eden Prairie lettering from front of building and replace with Staring Art Center. Erect a monument near curb with name. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-1-95 SECTION: REPORT FROM DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY ITEM NO. DEVELOPMENT xl-()-I DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger Resolution electing to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program in 1996. Requested Council Action: Adopt Resolution approving City participation in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program in 1996. Background: Cities electing to participate in the 1996 Livable Communities Program must submit an approved resolution to the Metropolitan Council by November 15, 1995. Cities have until December 14, 1995 to negotiate an agreement on housing goals to be met in 1996. City staff will continue to meet with Metro Council staff to negotiations housing goals. The City is urging the Metro Council to measure our efforts in meeting affordable housing goals on participation in available housing programs and on efforts in seeking available funding resources. We have explained that local market forces and available resources make the preliminary benchmarks created by the Metro Council staff unrealistic. After receiving similar feedback from many other cities, the Metro Council staff recognize that market forces strongly effect the degree to which cities can provide affordable housing. This is according to a letter recently submitted to the City Council from Craig Rapp, Community Development Director of the Metro Council. Several important points are cited in his letter, including: The marketplace dictates to a large extent how development occurs and that financial resources dedicated for affordable housing are scarce. Cities participating in Livable Communities will not be penalized if resources do not materialize. Staff added several whereas statements to the enclosed "model" resolution provided by the Metro Council that incorporate points from the Craig Rapp letter. Under the provisions stated in the resolution, the City Council could elect to participate in Livable Communities for 1996. If the City is unsuccessful in negotiating goals by December 14 that we feel are realistic and obtainable, the City can choose to opt out of the program at that time. Attachment: Letter from Craig Rapp dated October 23, 1995. Letter from City to Metro Council staff dated October 19,1995. X'I-D-l CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. ___ _ RESOLUTION ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1996 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (1995 Minnesota Laws Chapter 255) established a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund to address housing and development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund is intended to provide funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities to help meet housing related goals, and must participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year, and must agree to housing goals by December 14, 1995 that are realistic according to local market conditions and the availability of resources; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council must adopt by resolution negotiated affordable and life- cycle housing goals for each municipality by January 15, 1996, and by June 30, 1996, each municipality must provide to the Metropolitan Council the actions it plans to take to meet agreed upon housing goals; and WHEREAS, the City agrees to make every effort possible, within funding and market limitations, to create more affordable housing opportunities in Eden Prairie; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has closely evaluated the preliminary benchmarks suggested by the Metro Council and found them to be unrealistic when compared to local market conditions and available resources; and WHEREAS, the City has submitted a detailed proposal for achieving all affordable units possible with resources available and within local market conditions; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has assured the City of Eden Prairie through a communication dated October 23, 1995 from the Director of Community Development, that "Eden Prairie will be held accountable only for those things that you control" and that goal setting will be done that is "market-based", reflects funding realities and recognizes the abilities of local units of government to create an environment in which affordable and life cycle housing can occur; and WHEREAS, the City will not be penalized by the Metropolitan Councilor the State Legislature if limited progress is achieved in creating more affordable housing in Eden Prairie due to market constraints and lack funding available resources; and WHEREAS, If the City and Metropolitan Council are unable to agree to specific housing goals by December 14, 1995, the City will opt not to participate in the 1996 Metropolitan Communities Program. X \-D-2- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Eden Prairie hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during calendar year 1996 according to the provisions stating in this Resolution. __ Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk XI-O-:> Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future October 23, 1995 Dear Local Official: Now. that our ~ivable Communities implementation program is fully underway, I thought it would be important to prOVIde y?? Wlth an update, and reaflinn the Metropolitan Council's commitment to the Metropolitan Livable CommumtIes Act. Our.~t implementation step has been negotiating affordable and life-cycle housing goals. As the Co~'s ~ has mdica~ to you, we believe we have a framework for goal-setting that is market based, reflects fundin~ rea1ioes, and recogmzes the abilities oflocal units of government to create an environment in which affordable and life cycle housing can OCCUr. ?uring our negotiations, however, we have heard local officials express great concern about their limited ability to influence production of affordable and life cycle housing. We understand this concern. We also understand that the marketpla~ ~ continue to play the primary role in determining how development~. In additio~ ~ also know that limited resources are available to help you meet your goals, therefore, you will not be penalized if resources do not materialize. As .we m?~e forward together in this process, it is important that you clearly understand our expectations. We belie~e CItIes should be accountable for their zoning and approval processes, and for pursuing availabl~ affordab~e housmg resources. Therefore, we will expect you to examine zoning and approval processes to determme what, if any, .changes could b made to help create an environment for developing affordable and life cycle housing. Once that ~s completed, we would expect you to develop an action plan that states your willingness to pursue available funding oPPOrtunities. We. un~d that it takes time to build trust between partners. We also appreciate the fact that the law requires a rapId decxsion-making process. We value and need your cooperation and feedback. In. summary, we are entering into our discussions with high hopes and good faith intentions. We want you to know that Y01l! community will be held accountable only for those things that you control. We understand that the market and available resources will continue to determine whether your goals are actually accomplished. We look forward to working together with you on this exciting and important effort. Sincerely, CV CraigR Rapp Director, Community Development Division CRR/k-p cc: ~urt Johnson, Chair, Metropolitan Council Jun Sole~ Regional Administrator, Metropolitan Council MetropolItan Council Members 230 East Fifth Street st. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 IDO/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780 An Equal opportuntty Emplo!Jer X\-D-Y City of Eden Prairie City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Phone (612) 949-8300 • TOO (612) 949-8399 • Fax (612) 949-8390 October 19, 1995 Mr. Chuck Ballentine Director of Office of Local Assistance 230 East Fifth Street Metropolitan Council st. Paul, MN. 55101 Dear Chuck: . This letter is a proposal outlining how the City of Eden Prairie could participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. The City has been presented with a draft housing agreement prepared by Metropolitan Council staff that contains specific housing goals and benchmarks for the City to achieve over the next fifteen years. The Metro Council has adopted a process by which the housing agreements are developed through negotiations with local communities. These negotiations are based in part on the understanding that the ability of the City to achieve certain housing goals depends on local market conditions, and the availability of financial resources. Our analysis of the draft housing goals was done in this context. We have suggested an option to measuring community performance in Livable Communities based less on meeting specific numerical goals, and more on the level of effort demonstrated by communities in meeting regional goals through participation and involvement in various housing programs and activities. Cities choosing to participate in the 1996 Livable Communities Act must agree to do so by submitting a signed resolution to the Metro Council by November 15, 1995. Our goal is to meet this deadline and participate in the program in 1996. However, if a prerequisite to participation involves reaching agreement with the Metro Council on housing goals before this deadline, than we must be certain the goals are reasonable, realistic, and obtainable. Housing Principles: Eden Prairie supports all six principles listed in the draft housing goals agreement. These principles are consistent with goals and policies found in the City'S Comprehensive Plan which include: . Encourage a Variety of Housing Types and Costs for Different Living and Working Environments Through Innovative Architecture and Land Use Mixes. Attempt to Provide lower Cost, Non-Subsidized Housing Through Construction of Multiple Family Units and Manufactured Housing. Utilize PUD Approach to Evaluate Specific Projects. . ReCYCled Paper X\-o-S- Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 2 Encourage Low Income Family and Elderly Housing Developments Throughout Eden Prairie and Provide Quality Services Required by Residents. Use the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority to Support Development of Low Income and Elderly Housing Projects. Prepare Annual Housing Unit Estimates and Forecasts to Determine Level of Infrastructure Needed to Accommodate Future Growth, and To Monitor Housing Development Compared with Stated Goals in Comprehensive Plan. Use Housing Revenue Bonds to Assist in Developing Low Income and Elderly Housing Projects. Investigate the Possibility of Mobile Home Parks and Manufactured Housing. Apply for and Participate in Housing Demonstration Projects. Consider the use of Innovative Housing Techniques to Facilitate Affordable Housing - Developments. Draft Housing Goals: The Council has created benchmark indicators for cities to use in developing housing goals to be achieved over the next fifteen years. The benchmarks cover areas of housing affordability for both ownership and rental housing, life-cycle housing, and housing density. Listed next to the benchmarks are indicators of where cities are today in terms of meeting the various housing benchmarks. These numbers are listed below and followed by analysis and comment as to the feasibility of the City achieving the benchmarks. Affordability Current Housing Type Threshold Index Ownership Housing $115,000 42% Metro Benchmark 64-69% The benchmarks for Eden Prairie, which are based on averages of similar suburbs, do not consider market conditions unique to this area and the limitations of resources available at the local, regional, state, and federal levels. For example, values of homes now affordable under $115,000 are likely to rise above expected increases in the affordability threshold. This situation is exacerbated in Eden Prairie by a strong and healthy housing market that has experienced 5 % annual increases in home values over the last ten years. This has occurred in spite of a reduction in the lot size minimum 14 years ago from 13,500 to 9,500 square feet, a 25 % increase in allowable density. The Market has driven price. This has been affected by the supply of land that has been dramatically effected in the last five years by MUS A constraints and wetland legislation. Also, with land costs among the highest in the metro area, local developers and builders continue to maintain that single family detached housing, whatever the lot sIze, cannot be built for less than $115,000 without considerable public investment. Financing tools and public resources for ownership housing are limited. Most public resources are targeted toward low cost rental X\-()-h Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 3 .....r I housing developments, which suggests a greater level of need for affordable rental vs. ownership housing throughout the region. Forecasting the percentage of affordable ownership housing expected in the City by 2010 based on anticipated market conditions will help decide if the Metro Council benchmarks are achievable. It also will help establish housing goals that are reasonable and attainable by 2010. Table 1 below shows the expected percentage of ownership units in Eden Prairie from the years 1995 to 2010 based on the following assumptions: The affordability threshold starts at $115,000 in 1995 and increases $1,000 per year to $130,000 by 2010. This assumption is based on the median household income for the metro area increases 1 % per year over fifteen years. Council staff indicated that local - HUn officials expect small increases in household income over the next fifteen-years as "Baby Boomers" retire to fixed incomes, and with fewer dual-income households based on a growing trend of married woman leaving the work force to stay home with family. If this is true, the 1 % annual increase in median income assumption may be optimistic. All units with values less that $115,000 in 1995 will have values increase 1.5 % per year to 2010. Seventy-five (75 %) percent of the total housing units forecasted between 1995 and 2010 (7,000) are expected to be ownership units (5,250), creating 350 new ownership units annually. Thirty percent (30 %) of all new ownership units will have values less than the affordability threshold (l05 units/year). Single family "attached" units are the only new housing products being developed with values below $115,000. Table 1 Total Units Percent Percent Owned Affordability w/Values or Units w/Values or Year Units Threshold <Threshold Total > Threshold Total 1995 13.500 $115.000 4.440 33% 9.060 67% 1996 13.850 $116.000 4,430 32% 6,421 68% 1997 14.200 $117.000 4.343 31 % 9.858 69% . 1998 14.550 $118.000 4.253 29% 10.298 71% Xl -0-7 Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 4 Total Owned Year Units 1999 14,900 2000 15,250 2001 15,600 2002 .. 15,950 2003 16,300 2004 16,650 2005 17,000 2006 17,350 2007 17,700 2008 18,050 2009 18,400 2010 18,750 Units Afrordability w/Values Threshold <Threshold $119,000 4,162 $120,000 4,060 $121,000 3,964 $122,000 3,877 $123,000 3,790 $124,000 3,719 $125,000 3,640 $126.000 3,563 $127,000 3,478 $128.000 3,386 $129,000 3,329 $130,000 3,258 Percent Percent of Units w/Values of Total > Tbresbold Total 28% 10,739 72% 27% 11,191 73% 25% 11,637 75% 24% 12,074 76% 23% 12,511 77% 22% 12,932 78% 21% 13,361 79% 21% 13.788 79% 20% 14.223 80% 19% 14,665 81% 18% 15.072 82% 17% 15,493 83% The forecasts in Table 1 show that by 2010 only 17% of Eden Prairie's ownership units will be affordable under an assumed threshold of $130,000. This indicates that because of market forces achieving a goal of 64% affordable ownership housing by 2010, as suggested in the draft agreement, is impossible. In fact, this analysis shows that even if 30 % of all the new ownership housing developed between now and 2010 is affordable, the total percentage of affordable ownership housing will drop from 33 % to 17 %. The City will continue to promote the development of single family attached housing that is affordable under the proposed thresholds. The City will also entertain any subdivision design or lot configurations that facilitate affordable single family detached housing. But, with land costs in 1995 starting at $50,000 per acre and reaching as high as $80,000 for residential development, it is unlikely the suggested benchmarks could ever be met. Most resources available for housing are aimed at rental housing projects. We suggest that most, if not all, of the Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities funds (ALHOA), and the Local Housing Incentives Account funds (LHIA) available through Livable Communities be targeted toward rental housing in Eden Prairie. The City's estimated ALOHA contribution for Xt-D-S --------------------- - Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 5 for 1997 is $127,958. The need for affordable rental housing is evident by long waiting lists at Section 8 sites, and by the number of households spending more than 30 % of their gross income toward rent. It is reasonable to expect the private market, with encouragement from the City, to continue to generate about 30 % of all new ownership housing starts as affordable units. . . Goals for Ownership Housing: Goals for affordable ownership housing would be for the City to continue to participate in supportive programs such as the MHF A first time buyer program, be flexible in allowing higher densities or creative subdivision designs if it helps facilitate affordability, and continue to encourage the development of affordable single family attached housing product (townhouses, condos, and twin homes). Without additional resources available to help offset a continued ...- decrease in the percentage of affordable ownership units in Eden Prairie, we cannot agree to a goal above what can be realistically obtained. If the Council requires a numerical goal, we would agree to try to maintain 20 % of the total ownership units as affordable in the year 2010. This is based on the analysis shown in Table 1. We are open to using other assumptions in the analysis. For example, if we assume median household incomes increase by more than 1 % per year, the percentage of affordable housing by 2010 would increase. Housing Type Affordability Index Benchmark Rental $638/month 11 % 32-35% The rental housing situation in Eden Prairie is very similar to that of ownership housing, where strong market conditions combined with newer housing projects have created above average rents. The suggested benchmark for affordable rental units is not realistic for Eden Prairie. This number is based on averages of other communities in the metro area with very different market conditions and older housing. Table 2 below forecasts the percentage of aff~rdable rental units expected to develop in the City by the year 2010 under the following assumptions: Rental housing will account for 25 % of all new housing built between 1995 and 2010 (1,750 units/year). Twenty percent of all new rental units will be affordable (23 units/year). This represents a policy aimed at avoiding concentrating too many low-income units at one site .. It also matches the resources available through Livable Communities to help subsidize these units. Rents increase by 2 % each year. Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 6 Table 2 Total Rental Year Units 1995 5,220 1996 5,337 1997 5,454 1998 5,571 1999 5,688 2000 5,805 2001 5,922 2002 6,039 2003 6,156 2004 6,273 2005 6,390 2006 6,507 2007 6,624 2008 6,741 2009 6,858 2010 6,975 AtTordability Threshold $765 $780 $796 $812 $828 $845 $862 $879 $896 $914 $933 $951 $970 $990 $1,009 $1,030 Unit Percent Percent wlValues of Units w/Values of <Threshold Total > Threshold Total 574 . 11% 4,646 67% 597 11% 4,740 68% 620 11% 4,834 69% 643 12% 4,928 71% 666 12% 5,022 72% 689 12% 5,116 73% 712 12% 5,210 75% 735 12% 5,304 76% 758 12% 5,398 n% 781 12% 5,492 78% 804 13% 5,586 79% 827 13% 5,680 79% 850 13% 5,n4 80% 873 13% 5,868 81% 896 13% 5,962 82% 919 13% 6,056 83% Table 2 show affordable units representing 20 % of all new rental units, which is consistent with local policies aimed at limiting the number of low-income units per site. Twenty percent of all new rental units represent twenty-three units per year, or 345 units over fifteen years. Even under these assumptions, only 13 % of the City'S rental housing will be affordable to persons with incomes below 50% of the metro median by 2010. X \-0 -10 Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 7 The cost of providing twenty-three units per year is estimated to be $287,500, based on a per unit subsidy of $12,500. An annual subsidy of $287,500 is about what the City intends to invest in this effort based on an estimated Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities fund (ALHOA) contribution of $127,000, and a match from the Metro Council through the Local Housing Incentive Account (LHIA). This is not including $400,000 in Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds the City may invest in a thirty-two-unit low-income project scheduled for completion in 1996. We understand that this $400,000 can be credited toward meeting our future ALOHA contributions. We estimate that it would cost the City $24,223,200, or $1,614,880 annually to meet the Metro Council benchmark of 32 % affordable rental units by 2010. To meet this benchmark, 1,938 affordable units would have to be built over the next fifteen years. Section 8 Vouchers could be .. used in existing projects and would account for some future affordable units. However, there is no indication that Eden Prairie will ever receive more than fifteen Section 8 Vouchers through the Metro HRA, and if they are issued, it will be through a special preference policy. The City is supportive of tenant-based Section 8 housing, but high rents and low vacancies create market barriers that limit the usability of Section 8 Vouchers in Eden Prairie. Rental Housing Goals: As suggested previously for ownership housing, rental housing goals should be based on the level of effort the City shows in promoting affordable rental housing, not numerical targets. The City intends on dedicating most of its resources toward rental housing initiatives aimed at helping very-low income families achieve self-sufficiency, and at providing housing affordable to persons with lower paying jobs in Eden Prairie. If a numerical goal is required by the Council, findings from the analysis in Table 2 suggest that the City could only expect 13 % of its total rental stock to be affordable by 2010. Life-Cycle Housing Non-SF Detached Owner/renter mix INDEX 42% 71129% BENCHMARK 35-38% 70-75/25-30 % 42% 71129% The City expects to maintain the current proportions of life-cycle housing, which is above regional averages and well within benchmarks for owner/renter mix. It is estimated in Table 2 that 25 % of all future housing will be rental housing. Table 1 estimates that 20 % of all new ownership housing is non single-family detached. As you can see from the current mix, a variety of housing has developed in Eden Prairie over the last thirty years, including rental, single family detached, and single family attached housing. The City has planned for housing diversity through its Comprehensive Plan, PUD developments, and flexiple and creative zoning. Housing Density INDEX BENCHMARK /<\-0-1\ Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 8 SF Detached Multiple Family 1.9/acre 9/acre 1.9-2.3/acre lO-11/acre 2/acre lO/acre Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code allow housing densities as high as fifty units per acre. The apartment market in Eden Prairie has provided three story wood-frame developments with gross densities in the 10-15 units/acre range. The City has encouraged developers to consider building mid to high-rise apartment or condominium developments, ie, Point of France in Edina, on sites within our Downtown area. Because of the high cost of constructing mid and high-rise buildings, the lack of market, and lender discomfort with these products in the suburbs, we have yet to see a proposal. The density benchmarks for single family should include detached, and attached, single family .- housing in the calculations. This would increase the densities for both single family and multiple family designations in Eden Prairie above the benchmarks. Single family "attached" housing, represents about 20 % of the total housing stock in Eden Prairie, with average densities in excess of 5 units/acre. High density rental housing (> 10 units/acre) represents another 25 % of our housing stock. It is not clear how the Metro Council calculated density, whether its gross or net density. Not including wetlands in density calculations creates an average density for single family detached developments above 3 units/acre in Eden Prairie. One Housing Agreement: As discussed at a meeting held at the City offices on September 21 between City and Metro Council staff, participation in Livable Communities eliminates the need for two separate housing agreements as was originally considered. The City is prepared to do what it can to make progress toward meeting agreed upon goals through this initiative. We expect the same standards and expectations applied to all other participating communities will be applied to Eden Prairie. Conclusion: It is imperative to the success of Livable Communities that the Metro Council appreciate the extreme variations in market conditions effecting communities throughout the metropolitan region. Factors such as location, physical amenities, desirability, land availability, land costs, and general perception and appeal of a community, all effect housing costs. The high cost of housing in Eden Prairie is not controlled by the City, and is not a result of City imposed zoning barriers. It is instead a result of the desire of people from allover the region, state, and country, to reside here. The City cannot control demand from upper-income people for large expensive homes .. We also cannot control rising land prices, which are at!ributable mainly to a dwindling land supply resulting from Metro Council imposed MUS A restrictions. What we can do, however, is demonstrate responsibility toward meeting regional housing initiatives by recognizing local market realities, and develop accordingly housing goals and strategies that are X'l-O-IG Chuck Ballentine October 19, 1995 Page 9 realistic and obtainable. We are concerned about agreefng to unattainable housing goals that can later be used by anti suburban opportunists to provoke the legislature into considering legislation that places most of the burden for curing the region's housing problems on the backs of a few developing suburbs. Which further perpetuates the "us against them" rift that now seems to be developing between the northern and southern suburbs. The market analysis outlined in this letter illustrate market conditions in Eden Prairie, and the goals presented are reasonable and realistic. Please contact me at your earliest convenience with a response to this letter. Meeting the November 15 deadline will be challenging, but if we can get reasonably close to agreement within the next three weeks, it may be possible. .... Chris Enger Community and Economic Development Director cc Carl Jullie, City Manager Jean Harris, Mayor XI-O-J:S