Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/18/1995 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUFSDAY, JULY 18, 1995 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Piidcock, Ronald Case, Ross ThorFinnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra- Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS H. OPEN PODIUM M. MINUTES IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA ENTRY REVISED SCHF.IWATIC PLAN DESIGN SERVICES C. REAFFIRMATION OF THE EDEN PRAIRIE CO , TO D. PAFKO 2ND ADDITION 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.19 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Pafko 2nd Addition by Roger and Addie Halverson located at Kurtz Lane and northwest of Twin Cities and Western Railroad. (Ordinance for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5) E. APPROVE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEITED LAND LOT 4 BLOCK 1 EDEN PRAIRIE ACRES City Council Agenda Tuesday, July 18, 1995 Page Two V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/1VIEETINGS A. FOREST H MM 8TH ADDITION by Taurus Properties. Request for rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres and Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into 19 lots. Location: West of Baker Road south of Theresa Place. (Ordinance for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) B. PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER by Semper Development. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 9.46 acres, Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres and Preliminary Plat of 9.46 into one lot and road right-of-way. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District and Preliminary Plat of 9.46 acres) C. HARTFORD PLACE- OFFICE DEPOT by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc.. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 4.43 acres, PUD District Review on 4.43 acres and Site Plan Review on 4.43 acres. Location: Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie Lakes Business Park. (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment and Ordinance for PUD District Review) D. SUPERVALU EAW REVIEW by SuperValu. Review of EAW. (Resolution) E. VACATION 95-05: VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEIVIE M OVER PART OF WINDFIELD 5TH ADDITION (Resolution) F. VACATION 95-06: VACATION OF RIGHT-OF--WAY FOR PART OF VALLEY OAK DRIVE (Resolution) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VH. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VUL PEITTIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & CObIlVIIITEES X. APPOINTNEUM A. PLANNING CONDUSSION - Appointment of a member to the Planning Commission to fill an unexpired term through 2/28/% (Continued from July 11, 1995) City Council Agenda Tuesday, July 18, 1995 Page Three B. ARTS COMIVIISSION- 2 appointments to the Arts Commission to fill unexpired terms through February 28, 1997 XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS}RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES D. REPORT OF DwECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOP`NIII�iT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Approve Engineering Agreement for Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project, I.C. 945350 F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIIL ADTOURNMII�iT DATE:. ;slop, C= COUNCM AGMNDA 1 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR 7-18-95 DEPARTNI&PT: ITE w DESCRIP' on ITEM NO_ Finance - Pat Solie CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST IV.A THESE LICENSES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT HEADS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LICENSED ACTIVITY. CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM. ) GAS FITTER Friendship Ventures Jon R. Eagle Heating & Air Cond. PLUMBING HEATING & VENTILATING JLB Plumbing, Inc. Jon R. Eagle Heating & Air Cond. SowAdA & BArna Plumbing -Brady Mechanical Services, Inc. UTILITY INSTALLER Ron-Son Contracting LiliomActiouiDirectio= 7-18-95 page -� _ EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7/18/956 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO. -9 . DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry Recreation and Facilit s Revised Schematic Plan Design Services Robert A. Lambert BACKGROUND: Since the design for the realigned intersection of Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive has been developed, engineers have informed staff that the access to the Southwest Metro transit Hub and the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area must move approximately 150' further west than the existing plan. This change to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area requires major changes to the existing plan, unless the City would be satisfied with right in/right out access to that site. City staff would not recommend limiting access to a right in/right out at that location and are recommending the City reevaluate the schematic site plan approved for that location. Barb Cross, the City Landscape Architect, was recently assigned the responsibility to manage all City buildings. Due to that increased work load, she is unable to spend the time necessary to develop new schematic plans for this site within the next six months. At this time, the Watershed District is proceeding with obtaining the necessary permits from the various governmental agencies for the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Project. If we are going to redesign that entry we should have the new configuration developed as soon as possible in order not to delay the permitting process. CONSIDERATION: Staff have asked three landscape design firms to provide quotes for the cost to provide revised schematic plans for this entry site. As a part of the planning process, staff have requested that the quotes include the cost to provide several schematic plans that would depict a mixed use on that site. The existing plan projects 100% public use of that seven acre site as a public entry to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. After recent evaluation of the 10 year budget projections, staff are concerned that this plan would be an ongoing high maintenance area that would generate very little revenue for the City. Staff believes it is prudent for the City to reevaluate the need to dedicate that much of this valuable site for public access to the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. With the Southwest Metro Transit Hub located directly across Technology Drive there will be a sufficient amount of public parking available for this trail head and staff believes it may be more prudent to consider marketing the majority of the site for private use. Staff would recommend continuing the plan to develop the water quality improvement features, the dike and trail system, and the hard edge around the pond at the entry. Staff would recommend that a revised entry plan limit the amount of area needed for public access at this point, and maximize the amount of area that could be marketed for lease or sale to private users. 1 RECOMMENDATION: Attached to this memo is a copy of the proposal from Brauer and Associates, as well as from BRW. The LSA firm ultimately decided that they should not submit a proposal as there might be a conflict of interest perceived if they are also working on the Southwest Metro site. City staff are impressed with the proposal of both BRW and Brauer and Associates, and believe either firm would do a very good job. BRW proposed providing three different concept plans and refining the final plan for a fee of 7 980. Brauer and Associates proposed to provide four schematic plans and refining the final master plan for a fee of 6 850. Staff recommend the City hire Brauer and Associates for the project as per their proposal at a fee not to exceed $6,850. BL:mdd PCRAE/B& 2 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota June 29, 1995 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROPOSAL FOR PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA ENTRY—B&A#95-01-10 This letter proposal outlines a scope of services, fee schedule, and other elements which, if approved, constitutes an Agreement between the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, herein referred to as the OWNER, and BRAUER& ASSOCIATES LTD., herein referred to as the CONSULTANT. The OWNER hereby retains the CONSULTANT to provide professional services required to complete the tasks listed below in the Scope of Services for the PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA ENTRY project located in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT. The CONSULTANTS services shall include normal planning services as follows: A. SCOPE OF SERVICES-FOR PURGATORY CREEK RECREATION AREA ENTRY 1) Task I-Focus Meeting: Allows the Brauer team the opportunity to develop a very clear understanding of the scope of the project and intended outcomes. This includes: • Meeting with city staff to finalize the scope of the project, discuss the planning process, and confirm the project schedule. • Determine the extent of the information available about the site and receive project base mapping. • Preliminary assessment of issues surrounding the project. Anticipated Task Product: A brief letter report(if necessary)confirming the scope of the project,the planning process, project schedule, and a preliminary outline of pertinent issues. 2) Task II-Program Confirmation: Develop a complete understanding of needs, facility demands, and priorities. This includes: • Meeting with city staff and, if desired, designated city representatives to review and discuss programming issues and developmental concerns. • Finalize the program for the site. Anticipated Task Product: A letter report confirming the city's program statement. 3) Task III: Site Review. Develop understanding of the opportunities and constraints afforded by the site. This includes: • Site base map setup based upon site survey information provided by the city. • Site review and analysis to familiarize ourselves with the physical aspects of the site(i.e., identifying current features, topography, vegetation, water resources, soils, and the relationship of the site to adjacent properties and land uses). The city staff will be encouraged to join the consultant in the field to review the site. • Compare the proposed site with the land area requirements for the program facilities. • Review the findings of site review with city staff. Anticipated Task Product: Field worksheet for internal use. 1 .l�U '� Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota 4) Task IV: Schematic Design Concepts: Develop up to four(4)design schematics that turn the development program into a variety of physical relationships. This includes: • Preparation of up to four(4) alternative schematics that explore various design solutions for the site. • Presentation of schematics to city staff and designated city representatives to determine the most appropriate design approach for the site. Anticipated Task Product: Color design schematics that illustrate alternative uses of the existing site. 5) Task V-Master Plan and Character Sketches: Develop the final master plan and sketches(up to two) that respond to the selected schematic design(or combination of alternative schematics). This includes: • Review and analysis of previous findings. • Preparation of a master plan and character sketches(up to two) for the site. This essentially refines the accepted design schematic(s). • Review meeting with city staff and, if desired,the designated city representatives. • Submit final package to city staff. Anticipated Task Product: Color master plan graphic and character sketches mounted for presentation purposes. B. FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The OWNER shall compensate the CONSULTANT for completion of professional services described above as follows: 1. Tasks I and V as outlined above a lump sum fee(including all direct expenses and final presentation mounting) of$6,850. C. PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT 1. Invoices will be submitted to the OWNER on a monthly basis in proportion to the work completed. 2. Payments on account of the CONSULTANTS services are due and payable upon receipt of CONSULTANTS invoice. D. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY 1. Full program coordination with one individual representing the OWNER'S interests. 2. Legal Counsel, advice, and services available to the CONSULTANT during the term of this Agreement on any or all matters related to the PROJECT such as, but not limited to,title opinions, interpretations of agreements, covenants and laws affecting the PROJECT, advice and assistance in processing applications, review and preparation of PROJECT agreement documents, participation in presentations to public agency staff and boards and general counsel on the legal implications of all substantive or procedural aspects of the PROJECT itself. (Note: Permit submittals, if required, are not included under the scope of services. These will be completed on an hourly basis at direction of the city, if required.) 2 I Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry City of Eden Prairie, Mmnesota 3. Providing project base mapping in an AutoCadd Version 12 acceptable format. Base mapping shall include all normal survey.information, including boundary, topography, utilities, site features, vegetation, and so forth as necessary for planning and construction document purposes. 4. Providing all soil/geotechnical engineering and testing services as required for site development work for the duration of the project. E. NONDISCRIM[NATION The CONSULTANT will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, physical condition or age. The CONSULTANT will take affmmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, physical condition or age. Such action shall include but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training including apprenticeship. F. CONSULTANT'S RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS 1. The CONSULTANT shall maintain time records for hourly fees, design calculations and research notes in legible form and these will be made available to the OWNER, if requested 2. The CONSULTANT reserves the right to secure and maintain statutory copyright in all published books, published or unpublished drawings of a scientific or technical character, and other works related to this PROJECT in which copyright may be claimed. The OWNER shall have full rights to reproduce works under this Agreement either in whole or in part as related to this PROJECT. One copy of each drawing shall be provided in reproducible form for use by the OWNER,but the original drawings will remain the property of the CONSULTANT. G. TERM,TERMINATION, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 1. The term of the Agreement shall be concurrent with the work authorized. The project schedule shall be determined at time of commencing work. The actual schedule will be finalized during Task I once the overall parameters and issues affecting the project timeframe become better defined. 2. Termination may be accomplished by either party at any time by written notice, and shall be effective upon payment in full for all services performed to the date of receipt of such notice. 3. The OWNER and the CONSULTANT each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party of this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. 4. Neither the OWNER nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer his interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 3 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area Entry City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota IL EXTENT OF AGREEMENT AND APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the OWNER and the CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or Agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the PROJECT. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both OWNER and CONSULTANT. IN WITNESS HEREOF the OWNER and the CONSULTANT have made and executed this Agreement,this day of . 1995. CITY OF EDEN PRAHUE BRAUER TES LTD. =Georgetson, President 4 I o Ik June 19, 1995 B R w INC. Mr. Robert Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources City Hall 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Planning Transportation Engineering Urban Design Dear Bob, Thresher Square In response to our discussion on June 8th, BRW is pleased to submit this 700 Third street So. proposal for the Park Entry Concept Design for the Purgatory Creek Minneapolis, Recreation Area. This proposal outlines our understanding of the project, the MN 55415 work program, and project staffing, time schedule, and fee schedule. 612/370-0700 Fax 612/370-1378 The Purgatory Creek Recreation Area is a significant component of the new Denver Eden Prairie Marketcenter. The proposed Park Entry occupies a key position Milwaukee in the Marketcenter area and its successful development will help to complete Milwaukee Minneapolis the overall plan as defined in the Eden Prairie Marketcenter Design Framework. Orlando Phoenix We believe that BRW is ideally suited to assist you in the preparation of the Portland Concept Design since we are a multi-disciplinary design firm with a highly San Diego creative and experienced design staff. You are already familiar with our firm Seattle from the work on the Design Framework and from other projects we have completed for the City. Our work experience on the Design Framework should be especially useful, since this has given us a good understanding of the area issues and forces and the overall goals and objectives of the City. If you have any questions, or would like further information, please can me or Bob Kost. We look forward to working with you and the City of Eden Prairie again. Sincerely, BRW, INC. 7 Arij Pakalns, AIA, AICP Bob Kost, ASLA Vice President Project Manager AP/dc i i -F-V "7 I, I UNDERSTANDING OF PROTECT ISSUESNORCES The Purgatory Creek Recreation Area is a primary open space facility for the City of Eden Prairie and especially for the Marketcenter Area. The City has been working since 1982 to improve and upgrade this area and to provide a formal entry and trailhead at the northeast comer of the park, at the intersection of Technology Drive and Prairie Center Drive. A number of major issues/forces impact the proposed park entrance area: • The plan previously prepared for the park entry area may no longer be applicable and needs to be reexamined. • A transit center for Southwest Metro is being developed north of Technology Drive. The park entry needs to be coordinated with the transit center plans. Can a plan be developed to share the parking facilities? • The Purgatory Creek Watershed District is planning a number of improvements in the recreation area including: - Two outlet structures - A dike - Dredging - Hard and soft edges around the ponds - A major trail system with a trailhead at the park entry It will be especially critical to reexamine the location and design of the hard edges in the park entry area to make sure they meet the park program requirements. • The City would like to explore a multi-use or mixed-use concept for the park entry site which could include the park facility as well as commercial retail developments, restaurants, or other complementary uses. • The City is concerned about upkeep and maintenance expenses and therefore a plan needs to be developed which either requires low maintenance or for which the maintenance responsibilities can be shared with commercial developments. • Access to the site needs to be reevaluated in light of the proposed realignment of Technology Drive. An assessment needs to be made of all the forces/issues and a Concept Plan needs to be prepared for the park entry area in order to make sure it can accommodate the program elements and to provide guidance for future improvements in the area. BRW,Inc. Park Entry Concept Design 1 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area WORK PROGRAM BRW's scope of services shall consist of providing Professional Services to the City of Eden Prairie for preparing a Concept Design for the Purgatory Creek Park Entry. The services shall include the following work tasks: PHASE 1: CONCEPT PLAN Task 1: Inventory and Review of Past Studies Meet with City staff, review past and current studies and plans, and inventory project area to identify primary site forces/issues, which need to be considered in project development. Task 2: Preparation of Basemap of Project Area Prepare a basemap of the project area to represent existing conditions as well as known planned improvements around the project area. Task 3: Identification of Development/Activity Program From the discussion with City staff and based on BRW's past experience with similar projects, identify potential developments and activities which should be incorporated in the site development program. Review proposed development program and activities with City staff. Task 4: Preparation of Draft Concept Plans 3D Prepare up to three different concept plans for the park entry area. The plans should identify major uses, circulation systems, and special features and elements. Review concept 30 plans with City staff and assist in the selection of a preferred concept plan. 30 Task 5: Refinement of Preferred Concept Plan 3D Refine the preferred concept plan as the Recommended Concept Plan for the park entry area. Review Recommended Concept Plan with City staff. Provide a colored version of the 3D Recommended Concept Plan for City use. 3D Task 6: Meetings The Concept Plan task includes four meetings with City staff. Additional meetings would be at the direction of the Client and at the rates indicated in the Fee Schedule. 3D BRW,Inc. Park Entry Concept Design 2 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area 3 �$_� PHASE 2: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Phase 2 will consist of preparation of a Design Development Plan of the entry area. Specific tasks for Phase 2 shall be established after the completion of Phase 1. PROTECT STAFFING / TIME SCHEDULE / FEE SCHEDULE PROJECT STAFFING Key members of the BRW design team for this project will include: Arijs Pakalns as the overall project coordinator; Bob Kost, who is a registered Landscape Architect and who has worked with the City of Eden Prairie before, as project manager and designer; and Gary Erickson, who is a Professional Engineer, as project engineer. Additional staff for traffic issues, graphics, and production will be utilized as required. Resumes of the key staff people are attached. TIME SCHEDULE Phase 1 of the work program will be completed within 30 days. A schedule for Phase 2 will be set up at the time Phase 2 work is authorized. FEE SCHEDULE Compensation for the services provided shall be on an hourly basis according to the hourly wages multiplied by a factor of 3.0. Additional meetings, over and above the ones identified in the Work Program, shall be $400 per meeting. PHASE 1: CONCEPT PLAN The total cost of providing professional consultant services for Phase 1, as set forth in the Work Program, shall not exceed $7,980, unless additional amounts are approved in writing by the Client. A detailed breakdown of the fees by task is included below. BRW, Inc. Park Entry Concept Design 3 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area FEE SCHEDULE BY TASK: PHASE 1: CONCEPT PLAN Task # Task Name Hours Amount Task 1 Inventory and Review of Past Studies 8 $ 600 Task 2 Preparation of Basemap 28 1,600 Task 3 Identification of Development/Activity 9 695 Task 4 Preparation of Concepts 46 2,990 Task 5 Refinement of Concepts 17 1,095 Task 8 Meetings 12 900 Subtotal 120 $7,880 Expenses $ 100 TOTAL PHASE 1: CONCEPT PLAN $7,980 i I i PHASE 2: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Fees for Phase 2: Design Development shall be established at the time Phase 2 work begins. BRW,Inc. Park Entry Concept Design 4 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area R Arij s Pakalns, AIA, AICP Senior Urban Design Associate Education Bachelor of Science in Architecture, University of Minnesota, 1968 Professional Registrations/ American Institute of Certified Planners Affiliations Minnesota Society of Architects American Institute of Architects American Planning Association Work History BRW, Inc., Project Manager (1972 to Present) The Hodne/Stageberg PARTNERS, Inc., Project Manager (1967 to 1972) Experience Mr. Pakalns is a Project Manager/Designer in the Development Group and has prime responsibility for client relations, project management, programming, project design, design development and contract document preparation for urban design and planning projects. Urban Planning and Design Mr. Pakalns has extensive experience in the planning and design of urban redevelopment and improvement projects. Major projects that he has been involved in include: 50th and France, a four-block commercial redevelopment and streetscape improvement project in Edina, Minnesota; Block 54 Redevelopment in Chaska, Minnesota; the Whitney Mill Quarter Plazas for a key redevelopment block in the heart of the Minneapolis Mills District; the Spruce Tree Development in St. Paul, Minnesota; the ILN Redevelopment Plan for Richfield, Minnesota; the Downtown Commercial Area Redevelopment Plan for Rochester, Minnesota; the Gilbert Downtown Redevelopment Plan for Gilbert, Arizona; the Calhoun Street Transit/Pedestrian Mall in Fort Wayne, Indiana; the Campus Graphics and Mall Amenities Study for Arizona State University in Tempe; and the Central Entrance Plan for the University of Minnesota-Duluth. Corridor Development and Mr. Pakalns has specialized in master planning and design of roadway corridor Design improvements and enhancements. Projects he has completed include: the Eden Prairie Marketcenter Framework Plan for Eden Prairie, Minnesota; the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study for Brooklyn Center, Minnesota; the 77th Street Improvements for a three-mile roadway segment in Richfield, Minnesota; and the West River Parkway Improvements for a two-mile segment of the Great River Road through downtown Minneapolis. Planned Developments Mr. Pakalns has been responsible for a number of large, planned development studies as well as for their implementation. A major project, in which Mr. Pakalns was involved in from concept design to final implementation, is Centennial Lakes, a 100-acre multi-use development in Edina, Minnesota. Other projects include: the Central Area Plan for Eagan, Minnesota; the Edinborough mixed-use project in Edina, Minnesota; the Energy Park Master Plan for the Port Authority of the City of St. Paul; the Corporate Headquarters Concept Plan for the Tennant Company, Plymouth, Minnesota; and the City West Development in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. 20479-6/95 J� 1 ��12 Arij s Pakalns, AIA, AICP (Continued) Transit Planning and Design Mr. Pakalns has been involved in a number of major transit and fixed-guideway transportation system and station area planning and design projects including: the Northtown Transit Hub for Anoka County, Minnesota; the University of Minnesota Busway; the North LRT Corridor in Columbus, Ohio; the Midway LRT Corridor in Ramsey/Hennepin Counties, Minnesota; the Northeast LRT Corridor in Anoka/Hennepin Counties, Minnesota; the St. Paul South LRT Corridor in Dakota/Ramsey Counties; the Hennepin County Stage I LRT System; and the University Area Transit Study for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Transit Commission. Infrastructure Design Mr. Pakalns has developed unique expertise in the design of treatments and enhancements for infrastructure components such as pedestrian bridges, roadway bridges and structures, noise mitigation screen walls, and retaining walls. Exam- ples of this work include: the special TH 77 Urban Design Treatments for the many bridges and retaining walls at the Mall of America in Bloomington, Min- nesota; the landscaped screen wall along 77th Street in Richfield, Minnesota; the custom-designed roadway and pedestrian bridges at Centennial Lakes; the access road bridge for Medicine Lake Regional Park in Hennepin County; and the pedestrian bridges for West River Parkway in Minneapolis. Visual Assessment Studies As part of overall project planning and development, Mr. Pakalns has conducted a number of visual assessment studies for roadway and fixed-guideway transportation improvement projects including: TH 14 in southeastern Minnesota; Melrose Avenue in Iowa City, Iowa; Newark-Elizabeth Rail Link in Newark, New Jersey; Newark Airport People Mover in New Jersey; the new Federal Courthouse in Minneapolis, Minnesota; TH 14/52 through Rochester, Minnesota; 79th/80th Street in Bloomington, Minnesota; and I-494 in the southern half of the Twin Cities. 20479-6195 2 R Robert M. Kost, ASLA Senior Landscape Architect Education Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, University of Illinois Professional Registrations/ ASLA, Minnesota Affiliations American and Minnesota Society of Landscape Architects American Horticulture Society Minnesota Little Brothers Friends of the Elderly, Board of Directors Work History BRW, Inc., Landscape Architect (1986 to Present) Architectural Forum, Inc., Project Manager/Site Planner (1985 to 1986) Custom One International, Project Manager/Site Planner (1983 to 1986) Robert Engstrom Associates (1980 to 1983) Experience Mr. Kost is a senior landscape architect in the Development Group and serves as a project manager and project designer for public and private sector clients. Mr. Kost's responsibilities include project management, project design, government approvals, public meetings and workshops, contract document and cost estimate preparation, and construction observation. Landscape Planning and Major landscape projects designed by Mr. Kost include the 40-acre corporate Design campus for Cray Research, Inc. in Eagan, Minnesota; Elm Creek Parkway Trail System at Elm Creek PUD, Camplin, Minnesota; and West River Parkway along the Mississippi River, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Urban Design Urban design projects managed or designed by Mr. Kost include the Block 10 Redevelopment Area of in the Historic Mills District, Minneapolis, Minnesota; 50th and France Streetscape, Edina, Minnesota; Implementation of the Public Arts Program for the New Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and the Comprehensive Streetscape Rehabilitation, Valdosta, Georgia. Master Planning Master planning and site design projects completed by Mr. Kost include the Long- Range Campus Master Plan for the North Memorial Medical Center, Robbinsdale, Minnesota; the 90-acre Country Club Commerce Center, West Des Moines, Iowa; Covington Corporate Center, Chicago, Illinois; Parkers Lake, a 225-acre multi-use PUD, Plymouth, Minnesota; Sugar Woods, a 40-acre multi-use PUD, Orono, Minnesota; and The Waters, a 400-acre multi-use business park, Eagan, Minnesota. 20488.•6195 R Gary J. Erickson, PE Vice President Education Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Michigan Technical University Master of Business Administration, St. Thomas College, St. Paul, MN Professional Registrations/ Registered Professional Engineer, State of Minnesota, State of Florida Affiliations American Public Works Association Chi Epsilon American Society of Civil Engineers Minnesota Surveyors and Engineers Society Experience BRW, Inc. (1989 to Present; 1979 to 1985). Mr. Erickson is an officer of BRW in charge of major civil engineering projects including site development, highways and municipal engineering. Mr. Erickson maintains a hands-on involvement in design, coordination and review of projects. Mr. Erickson was a Senior Associate in BRW's Engineering Studio from 1979 to 1985. He was involved as a project engineer and project manager for the civil design of projects ranging from site development to municipal parks, streets and utilities. During this time Mr. Erickson was the primary engineer-in-charge of site development for BRW's architectural and site development projects. His experience included dealing with the unique geographic conditions and varied municipal requirements in the States of Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan and Illinois. His role also involved the evaluation and design of site access from curb cuts to freeway interchanges. Dakota County (1985 to 1989). Mr. Erickson was the Director of Physical Development. His major day-to-day involvement was the oversight of the planning, design and construction of a $60 million expansion program for County facilities. The projects included the addition of two buildings and the remodeling and doubling in size of the existing administration and courts building at the County's Government Center Campus in Hastings, MN. The project involved unique challenges of difficult terrain features, variable soil conditions, and the redevelopment of a 15-year-old site to accommodate the new facilities. A third building of 165,000 feet was constructed in another part of the County on a 12-acre site master planned for additional future expansion. Dakota County Highway Department (1977 to 1979). Mr. Erickson served as the Dakota County Highway Department Administrative Design Engineer. His responsibilities included the administration of all planning, programming and design of county highway projects, right-of-way acquisition and preparation of project documentations. Minnesota Department of Transportation (1969 to 1977). Mr. Erickson served as a Project Manager in the Oakdale District Preliminary Design Section. His major responsibilities included preliminary design and environmental impact analysis of highway projects. 20429-8185 � � 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar July 18, 1995 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Human Resources& Community Services Reaffirmation of the Eden Prairie Manifesto IV. C. Requested Action: It is recommended that the Council reaffirm the language in the Manifesto originally adopted in May 1993. Background: The Manifesto was initially drafted by the Human Rights and Services Commission. As a result of the restructuring of City Commissions this past spring,the primary responsibility for promoting the Manifesto and its principles now rests with the Human Rights and Diversity Commission. The Commission seeks Council reaffirmation of the Manifesto as it continues its out reach efforts to encourage Eden Prairie organizations to adopt the Manifesto. Supporting Material: Draft of Proposed Manifesto. Form cci-manimpd disc HRDC/njs Prologue (A Minnesota Manifesto) The Americas were rich in cultural diversity long before the arrival of the first Europeans. American cultures were reflected,by then,in more than two hundred language families,evolved through centuries of migration, intermingling,and the building and changing of traditions. In the relatively short time since the first Europeans arrived,explorers,immigrants and slaves have brought new cultures from virtually all corners of the world,each facing the inevitable challenges of preserving the old traditions,values,and identities while adapting to the new. Over the last three centuries,the United States has developed ethical and legal commitments to cultural diversity--a bold venture to guarantee individual rights in a multicultural and multiracial society,to develop a bond of unity within the richness of diversity. That venture is bold because cultural interaction and change brings tensions,and it is the challenge of our community to channel those tensions toward creative and positive results,towards unity with diversity. An Eden Prairie Manifesto That we, as representatives of Eden Prairie businesses, city government, educational and religious institutions, accept special roles and responsibilities in fostering diversity in our community. We are dedicated to upholding the rights of every individual in our community to freedom, dignity, and security regardless of religious affiliation,race, ethnic heritage, gender, age, sexual orientation,physical or mental ability, or economic status. Representing all sectors of Eden Prairie, we publicly declare our intentions: to continue the development of a multicultural community which will not tolerate acts of harassment and intolerance; to establish, communicate and encourage community standards that respect diversity; and to promote acceptance and respect for individuals in an atmosphere of caring for others. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of May 1993. REAFFIRMED by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 18th day of July 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor Date WE ARE AND WILL REMAIN INTOLERANT OF INTOLERANCE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-18-95 SECTION: 2ND READING ITEM NO. 1-Z• Q DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger PAFKO 2ND ADDITION Michael Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.19 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Rezoning 2. Developer's Agreement PAFKO 2ND ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the R1-22 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the R1-22 District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of July 18, 1995, entered into between Pafko 2nd Addition and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 20th day of June, 1995, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 18th day of July, 1995. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on Exhibit A Legal Description Pafko 2nd Addition Rezoning Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2, Pafko Addition Preliminary Plat Lot 2, Block 1 and Lot 2 and 3, Block 2, Pafko Addition PAFKO 2ND ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Kurtz Lane and northwest of Twin Cities and Western Railroad from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.19 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) IV7. 0 . y DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT PAFKO 2ND ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of July 18, 1995, by Roger and Addie Halverson, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 4.19 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.55 acres into 8 single family lots and two outlots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. , for rezoning, and Resolution No. 95-121, for Preliminary Plat, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 20, 1995, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. 4. CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY: Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall submit a Conservation Easement as depicted in Exhibit E for review and approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. The location for this Easement is shown on the approved plans (Exhibit B.) Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, Developer shall deliver and record the Conservation Easement in the Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrars Office and shall provide evidence of the recording of Conservation Easement prior to the release of the first building permit. 5. DEDICATION OF OUTLOTS: Developer agrees to dedicate Outlots A and B to the City for stormwater handling purposes free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and mortgages. The dedication of Outlot A and B to the City shall occur prior to the release of the final plat. 6. VACATION OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY: Prior to approval of Final Plat, Developer shall make application to the City Engineer for vacation of unused portion of Kurtz Lane right-of-way lying within the property. 7. FINAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer agrees to implement the final grading and drainage plan as approved by the City Engineer. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit and obtain City Engineers approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the Erosion Control Plan approved by the City Engineer and notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading so that the erosion control may be field inspected. 8. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to any grading on the property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a plan depicting the construction grading limits and the trees to be saved on the property. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit, Developer shall place a construction fence at the limits of the proposed grading and around the dripline of the trees to be saved as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected. 9. CONNECTION TO PUBLIC UTILITIES: Concurrent with utility construction on the Property, Developer agrees to provide public sanitary sewer and watermain stubs to the front property line of the existing house on Lot 3, as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer further agrees that, at such time as the existing private utilities fail for the existing house located on said Lot 3, the existing house shall be required to be connected to the public utility stubs and the existing well and septic systems shall be abandoned and sealed in accordance with City Code requirements. 10. TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 1154 inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 308 inches. Tree replacement required is 109 inches. The Developer has received the City's approval of a tree replacement plan for 109 caliper inches. Developer agrees to implement or cause to be implemented the tree replacement plan for 109 caliper inches prior to any building permit for Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 as depicted in Exhibit B. 11. SCREENING FENCE: Prior to issuance by City of any building permit for Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, as depicted in Exhibit B, Developer shall install the six foot high cedar wood screening fence along the south property line as depicted in Exhibit B. 12. FINAL ORDER NO. 95-21: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances from City Code requirements within the R1-13.5 Zoning District for lot depth of less than 150 feet adjacent to a railroad for lots 6 and 7 as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said approval has been granted through Final Order #95-21, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order No. 95-21. Developer agrees to file Final Order #95-21 of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals on the Property at Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrar's Office prior to the building permit issuance. Prior to the release of any building permit on the property, Developer agrees to provide proof of filing to the City. DATE: 07/18/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: IV.E SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Authorize Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Land, Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie Acres Eugene A. Dietz Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that City Council take the following action: 0 Adopt the resolution authorizing conveyance and disposal of tax forfeited land • Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to make application to Hennepin County for conveyance of tax forfeited land The effect of this action will allow the development of the plat for American Lutheran Church 2nd Addition as proposed. In addition, it will allow for the City and County to acquire additional right-of- way as well as the construction of a NURP pond for storm water quality and improvements to the existing areas. Overview: This property was tax forfeit in June, 1987. The property was withheld from auction at the request of the City several times while the City studied the property's use as a potential storm water ponding site. In December of 1994 Hustad Development Company proposed a 13-lot subdivision called American Lutheran Church 2nd Addition which incorporated the tax forfeit parcel into the plat as an outlot over the ponding area and approximately 8,000 square feet of the lot to be incorporated as rear yards of two proposed lots. The City Council approved the preliminary plat of this proposal in March of 1995. Staff feels that this is the best use of the property for the following reasons: • Hennepin County and the City acquire additional road right-of-way • The pond will serve a much larger drainage area than the subdivision, including a portion of Pioneer Trail • The developer will construct the pond at no cost to the City • The City will recover approximately $63,000 in special assessments against the property. The portion of the property to be incorporated into lots will be returned to the tax rolls -the goal of the State Land Department. In summary, this is a win situation for the City, County, developer and taxpayers in general and the plan conforms to the preliminary approvals previously given the developer. 14 �: i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE AND DISPOSAL OF TAX FORFEITED LAND WHEREAS, provided in Minnesota Statutes 282, the City Council is asked to determine the disposal of tax forfeited land and WHEREAS, the City can approve the parcels for public auction, or approve sale of the parcel to adjacent landowners, or request conveyance to the City for public use without monetary consideration or request that the parcel be held for auction for one year, and WHEREAS, the City desires to acquire a portion of a tax forfeit parcel for use as a regional storm water pond and request the Hennepin County Board to sell the remainder of the parcel to the adjoining property owners through a private auction, and WHEREAS, the remaining portion of the parcel to be privately auctioned, will not meet minimum zoning standards for a residential lot, thus allowing a private auction among adjoining property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eden Prairie does request the Board of Hennepin County to approve a conveyance to the City for public use without monetary consideration the following described parcel, and to approve a sale of remaining parcel, description following, to the adjoining property owners: Legal description of parcels: Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie Acres, Hennepin County Legal description of portion to be conveyed to City: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Lot 4 distant 48.20 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Lot 4 a distance of 136.04 feet; thence northeasterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4 distant 196.65 feet north of said southeast corner and there terminating. Legal description of parcel to be sold to adjoining property owners: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Eden Prairie Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Lot 4 distant 48.20 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Lot 4 a distance of 136.04 feet; thence northeasterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4 distant 196.65 feet north of said southeast corner and there terminating. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk T_ ;o rail •Weer T ��� PROPOSED 16,590 sq.R. PRELIMINARY POND 7 AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH 2ND ADDITION J \\ I III JJI I I� !� / j •� I o �w� ti� \ \\\�`` � 2 \� u Existing Zoning: Public/RI-22 t I I:! J — Proposed Zoning: RI-13.5 �6241+4fl \ II ; I _ Existing Land Use: Church/Low Density Res. --_I=---�I" _ I I 2 I i PRDPOsED Proposed Land Use: Low Density Res. __—————_ PARKING i - ti, - .. 41 - ! — Blossom Road ' ' ---- -- 1 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-18-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. \/. A . DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres; • Adopt a Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 9.1 acres into 19 lots. Background: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission on three separate occasions with a unanimous recommendation for approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat made at the July 10, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission spent several meetings discussing the transition to the surrounding existing R1-22 neighborhoods, the need for a road connection of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road, and drainage impacts on existing homes. The Planning Commission believed that a transition to the adjoining neighborhood was necessary and directed the Developer to remove two lots from the western portion of the property, to increase lot depth, and save existing vegetation. The first plan reviewed by the Planning Commission was 21 lots, with an average lot size of 13,500 sq. ft. abutting the existing R1-22 neighborhoods on the west and north sides of the property. Lot depths averaged 150 feet. No trees were proposed to be saved with the original proposal. The current plan has 19 single family lots with an average perimeter lot size of 17,500 sq. ft. Lot depths were increased to 175 feet. This allowed a portion of the lots on the western side to retain a 30 foot strip for natural vegetation. The Planning Commission further required that the existing small pine trees (if possible) be transplanted to the rear lot lines of the western lots. On the north side of the project, there are three proposed lots which match up to the same number of lots on the north side of the property. The Planning Commission felt this was an adequate transition. The Commission also required tree replacement in this location. The first road plan presented by the Developer showed a connection of Forest Hills Road to Theresa Place. The Planning Commission directed the Developer to eliminate this road connection and provide access from Baker Road only. The Planning Commission believed there were not significant traffic problems in the area that needed to be resolved by a road connection, that the existing neighborhoods on Forest Hills Road and Theresa Place have lived on dead-end roads for many years, and that the overall area is adequately served by City streets. v. A . Residents in Forest Knolls expressed concern about water in the proposed pond encroaching into their back yards. Currently, after heavy rains, water does encroach into the backyards. This is due to the elevation of the pipe which flows under Baker Road to the east. The pond has been designed to handle all of the water runoff, not only from this project, but from the surrounding areas. Water will not encroach any further into the backyards after the pond is constructed than occurs under current conditions. The Planning Commission recommended that a sidewalk connection be made between this project and the Theresa Place cul-de-sac. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 2. Staff Reports dated July 7, 1995, June 23, 1995 and June 9, 1995 3. Planning Commission Approved Minutes of June 12, 1995 and June 26, 1995 4. Correspondence �/. A. FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION FOR TAURUS PROPERTIES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Forest Hills 8th Addition for Taurus Properties dated July 13, 1995, consisting of 9.1 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of July, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk V. A, - 3 Aplorove& K..C. 14;.t,,4es CcJcunQ- 2-41 199 S B. FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION by Taurus Properties. Request for rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres and Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into 20 lots. Location: West of Baker Road south of Theresa Place. Franzen noted that at the last meeting, the Commission directed the developer to look at a revised concept plan. The new plan indicates no connection to Forest Hills Road. There is one less lot along the west property line. A sidewalk or trail connection is possible within City right-of-way and between two lots to make the connection between Forest Hills Road and Theresa Place. The Commission also asked Staff to look into any past traffic studies or traffic counts that have been done in the area. In June of last year, there were traffic counts done at 3 intersections. One was at Valley View Road and Golf View Drive, one at the intersection of Golf View Drive and Kingston Drive, and one was at Holly Road. Most of the traffic was concentrated down at Golf View Drive and Valley View Road because that's where the highest density is. Over the course of a 24 hour period, about 1400-1450 vehicles went over the meter, and about 40% of those cars would be during peak hours, at 7:00 or 8:00 in the morning. Another busy time period was between 4:30 and 6:00 in the afternoon when people are coming home from work. The traffic count for Golf View and Kingston is about 750 cars over the course of the day. Duane Dietrich, representing Taurus Properties, reviewed his project with the Planning Commission. He noted that they have removed a lot and are down to 19 units. The lots average about 16,000 square feet each. Tracy Keibler, residing at 6995 Mariann Driver. commented that the developer has worked very nicely with the residents, and has provided a good transition. She said that even though the one lot near her end is being removed, she was concerned about the fact that it's just going to be rezoned to 13.5. There are 3 lots that are even less than 13.5 that are in the 12,000 range. She is very concerned about the density issue. Evelette Biornsen, residing at 6975 Mariann Driver, expressed concern that there are two many houses in such a small area, that it's too tight. She feels that all the homes will be crammed in together. Mike Zimmer, 6923 Kingston Driver, expressed concern that road, as it connects to Golf View and Holly, has truly become a thoroughfare. He was concerned about cars speeding and running stop signs. His concerns are for the safety of the small children. Glen Bowen, 7025 Mariann Drive, was concerned that the preservation of trees is critical in providing a satisfactory transition for the new neighborhood with respect to their lot. The trees extend across a substantial portion of their lot, and it would also benefit new adjacent lots in the development. VA . - y c C LaM Steinblock, residing at 13710 Theresa Place, thanked the developer for listening to the neighborhood concerns. He is concerned about bringing traffic into an area that was never meant to receive traffic. Foote was concerned about the removal of trees according to the letter from Glenn Bowen. Dietrich replied that he will do whatever he can to save the trees. The ordinance is such that if they are significant trees, they would have to replace them. The trees that are 30 feet on the back of the Lots 1, 2, and 3 will remain. Kardell noted that for the benefit of the audience, only a conceptual plan is being reviewed this evening. The developer is required to come back with a full set of plans which will include a tree inventory. The Commission's experience is that trees are a resource. Clinton expressed concern about the connection of Forest Hills to Baker. He feels that people are creatures of habit and will continue to use Kingston to get down to Golf View. Wissner was concerned about sidewalks being put in if the cul-de-sac is removed. She is in favor of the cul-de-sac. She has no problem with the amount of homes. She also noted that the developer made an effort to revise the plan for a better transition. Dietrich commented that it doesn't make sense to put one sidewalk in one block. He said to do it right and sidewalks are needed on other roads in the area. Wissner suggested a sidewalk only if it became a major thoroughfare. Kardell suggested that the neighbors who live on Kingston and Golf View work with the Engineering Staff, and bring their concerns forward to help with the traffic problems. MOTION 1: Schlampp moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend that the project be continued until the July 10, 1995 meeting with direction that the developer provide the required information on grading, drainage, utilities, ponding, tree replacement, sidewalks, and the asphalt path from Theresa Place. Motion carried 6-0-0. v. A . - s APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION June 12, 1995 B. FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION by Taurus Properties. Request for rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres and Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into 20 lots. Location: West of Baker Road south of Theresa Place. Franzen noted that Staff has looked at this project for quite a long time. A neighborhood meeting was held in the Council Chambers on May 4th. Lot size and road connection issues were raised by the neighborhood. Staff and the developer decided to come to the Planning Commission with a concept plan first before preparing construction drawings to get direction on road connections and lot sizes. The Staff Report identifies two questions. What should the lots sizes and the density be, and should Forest Hills road connect to Baker Road. Duane Dietrichs, representing Taurus Properties, reviewed his project with the Planning Commission. He noted that they have acquired the northerly 4 parcels from three different property owners. He initially began with a plan for 23 lots, but after speaking with Staff and the Engineering Department, the number of lots was reduced to 21. The new access to Baker Road was in the same spot that the neighborhood group suggested. 3 C � Franzen reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commission. He noted that there are 6 different possible ways of looking at the road connections to go through to Baker Road. One option is to connect to Theresa Place. Staff suggests either option one or three. He suggested the commission first consider the reasons for road connections, then if these reasons apply in this situation and then to choose a road alignment. The lot sizes proposed are not the smallest or the largest as compared to the surrounding area, but staff believes that the transition is reasonable. Larry Simon, noted that he resides on the cul-de-sac. He expressed concern about the elimination of the cul-de-sac. He said that that's what brought him and his wife out to Eden Prairie. He feels that someone asking to have bigger lots for transition is not out of line. He noted that there is a traffic problem out there. There is a health club nearby, and everyone who takes their children to school would love to use that access as a short cut. Tracy and Chuck Keibler, residing at 6995 Mariann Drive, noted that the plan is much better than it was the last time they saw it. In terms of transition, they feel people get caught up in the R1-22-and the R1-13.5. They expressed concern that the 3 lots that need the variances will be quite small given the average size of the lots nearby. Joann and Tom Meyer, residing at 13695 Theresa Place, noted that they have the abutting lot on the north side of the proposed addition. They expressed concern about the lots being small compared to the large lots in the neighborhood. They are very concerned about the density issue. They would like to see only 14 or 16 homes. They are concerned about the raw area and are still unclear about what's proposed for the pond. They are concerned about the pond because they have flooding in that area. They are in agreement with the road with Theresa Place as a cul-de-sac. Franzen commented that when the developer first brought a plan in, they had a plan that showed how big the pond was going to be. It was a sized according to how much water was supposed to be in the area. Since the revised plan is a concept, the drainage plan is not complete yet so staff does not know whether or not this area is really large enough for a pond. Staff wants to make sure the pond area is large enough so the water does not go beyond its current level on the property to the north. Joann Meyer indicated that she would like to know what height the new homes will be, and if they are comparable to the homes on Theresa Place. Dietrichs noted that the homes would be of a similar height. Joann Meyer expressed concern about the sewer and water issue. She wants to know about the assessment and will they be involved with it. She would like that in writing. Franzen replied that all assessments will be against each of the lots within the subdivision. Staff can get a letter from the Engineering Department to say there 4 v. A, - 7 c � is no assessment on the Meyer's property. Joann Meyer was concerned about where the road is going to be, and would like to know, as they get closer to the time given, what the price of the homes will be. Franzen replied that this road would be 50 feet of right-of-way. The pavement will be 8 feet away from the back of the curb to where the property line would start, about 11 feet on either side of the road. Clinton noted that the Planning Commission does not address home value or price, but reviews lot size and density. Price is an issue between the property owner and the market. Loreena Reiff, noted that she is thinking about selling her property. She signed a tentative agreement. Her purchase agreement was signed saying that the lower half of her property would remain clear from any infringement as a result of this building. She was not in favor of selling her property to begin with, but was approached by the developer and decided that it might be a good thing to go along with the proposed development. There are provisions that are to be maintained with this new road, and she was concerned about what they have in mind as far as that road is concerned. Dietrichs noted that road in no way will infringe on her property. The cul-de-sac where she lives is not being extended and nothing has changed. Glenn Bowen, residing at 7025 Mariann Drive, noted that his property is on the top of the west side. He made reference to Lots 2, 3, and 4. He stated that there are conifer trees which shade his property. He would consider that a suitable transition if those trees were contained in Lots 2, 3 and 4. John Mallo, residing at 14000 Forest Hill Road, was concerned about the impact of Forest Hill of people living there. The second issue is what kinds of problems will Golf View and Holly Road have if the traffic is there. He did a petition in the neighborhood, everyone signed it and no one wanted it extended. He did a survey of cul-de-sacs, and just in the Edenvale development there are 31. He noted that a cul- de-sac is very much the rule rather than the exception. Richard Greene, residing at 13731 Theresa Place, expressed concern about whether or not sewer and water are going to come in. He also was concerned about the safety of the children in the neighborhood if the cul-de-sac does not remain. Dietrichs noted that the sewer will connect through the water and sewer that is terminated at the end of the cul-de-sac, and any damages will be fixed by the Developer. 5 c � Wissner was concerned about whether sidewalks will be put in if Forest Hill continues and goes out to Baker Road. Franzen replied that that's something that hasn't been studied yet. Foote asked if there were any instances in the City where you have a road just stopping like this. Franzen replied that the only one he could think of is Welter Way off of Sunny Brook Road. Ismail expressed concern about the past traffic studies on Kingston and Golf View Drive. Ismail stated that he feels it should be studied, if a road connection is considered. MOTION 1: Schlampp moved, seconded by Wissner, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0-0. Wissner commented that lot sizes are consistent with the overall area. She would like the sidewalk issue looked into. She asked about the City policy on cul-de-sacs vs. through streets. Franzen explained the policy is to pursue road connections and to minimize unnecessary cul-de-sacs. Necessary cul-de-sacs may be for traffic control, to save trees, topography and differences in land use. Through streets distribute traffic and provide better emergency vehicle access. Foote noted that from a planner's prospective, he would like to see the road connected. However, based on existing conditions, he could support no connection. He would like to see one lot taken out on the west side for a better transitions. Ismail indicated that he did not see compelling reasons to make Forest Hills Road connect to Baker Road. i MOTION 2: Clinton moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend a continuance, and direct the developer to prepare a plan with no connection to Baker Road, one less lot on the west side, a sidewalk connection from Forest Hills Road to Theresa Place. Motion carried 5-0-0. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Forest Hills 8th Addition APPLICANT: Duane Dietrich FEE OWNER: Duane Dietrich, Loreena Reiff, and Norman Franks LOCATION: West of Baker Road, South of Theresa Place REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into 19 lots. J y 7 \ C RC*74 R1Yc- 0 I •C < ///////// KERR71CZ / ST HILL ROA // / / 10. X ' X L ? i W "y I C: tj • C 5U J V. R . - 10 c c Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition July 7, 1995 BACKGROUND This is a continued item from the June 26, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the concept plan for 19 lots, no connection of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road, and a sidewalk between Lots 6 and 7. The Planning Commission directed the Developer to provide all of the required plan information for grading, streets, utilities, tree loss, tree replacement, storm sewers and ponding for the July loth meeting. PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 9.08 acres into 19 single family lots at a density of 2.09 units per acre. The average lot size on the project is 16,392 sq. ft. Lots 2, 7, and 9, Block 2 require lot size variances since they are smaller than 13,500 sq. ft. The variances are requested as a trade-off for providing larger and deeper lots along the west and north sides of the property for transition. Lot 9, Block 1, requires a street frontage variance from 85 feet to 76 feet. This lot could be revised to meet the street frontage requirement, however, this additional 8.6 feet would be designated as a drainage easement for the ponding area. Due to the shape and design of the pond, the Engineering Division would want more of the land designated as an outlot to the City. The staff believes that this is a reasonable street frontage request. The lot width at the building setback is 85 feet and would allow a 60 foot wide house between side yard setbacks. GRADING AND TREE LOSS There is a total of 201 inches of significant trees, as defined by City code, on the property, or 12 trees. Four trees, or 74 inches, would be lost due to construction or construction practices. Tree replacement for this project is 36 inches. This is the equivalent of twelve, 3" shade trees. The staff would suggest planting these trees along the northern lot lines of Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9. The grading plan along Lots 1, 2, and 3 has been revised to leave a 25 foot area at the top of the hill to preserve portions of the existing shade and conifer trees. Depending on the health and spacing of the conifer trees, some of the conifers proposed to be removed, could be transplanted to other areas on the property. The staff would suggest relocating them within the same general area along the western property line. UTILITIES City sewer and water can be provided by connecting to an existing sewer and water line in Theresa Place. 2 C C Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition July 7, 1995 STORM WATER PRETREATMENT The size of the watershed draining water into this site is 12 acres. The amount of storage required is 1.8 acre feet. The proposed ponding area meets this size requirement. There is an existing storm sewer pipe adjacent to the proposed pond which drains storm water across Baker Road. The elevation of that pipe is 895.8. The pond depth elevation is 890, which means there will be permanent water. The size of the ponding area must be 1.8 acre of storage above the 895.8 elevation. Water is proposed to rise to an elevation of 897.7. This means that during heavy rains, portions of Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Forest Knolls may have water in their,backyards. Water normally collects in the area proposed for the pond after heavy rains. The amount of water in backyards now should be the same after the pond constructed. SIDEWALKS The 20 foot wide drainage utility easement between Lots 6 and 7 is proposed by the Developer for a sidewalk connection to Theresa Place. The Parks and Recreation staff have evaluated the proposed sidewalk and do not recommend its construction because there are no existing sidewalks on Theresa Place or Forest Hills Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Community Development Staff would recommend approval of the project based on plans dated July 7, 1995 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 7, 1995, and based upon the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Submit a tree replacement plan for 36 inches. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3 V.A. - )z. � C Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition July 7, 1995 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Submit final plans for review by the Fire Marshal. 4. Prior to second reading by the City Council, the proponent shall apply for and receive street frontage and lot size variances from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. S. Apply for and receive an entrance permit from Hennepin County for Candice Lane. 6. Prior to the commencement of grading on the property the Developer shall install tree protection fencing around trees to be preserved by the property. The tree fencing shall be approved by the City Forester a minimum 48 hours prior to the start of grading. 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Bob Lambert, .,Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: July 13, 1995 SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report to the July 7, 1995 Community Development Staff Report for Forest Hills 8th Addition BACKGROUND: This site is 9.1 acres in size and fronts on to Baker Road in the vicinity of Theresa Place and Arbor Glen Drive. It is bordered by an older single family residential development to the north and large single family lots to the south. The proposed development would involve rezoning the property from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and the platting of 19 single family lots and one outlot. The density for this site would be approximately 2.09 units per acre with an average lot size of 16,392 square feet. This parcel of land has a total of 12 significant trees that represents a total of 201 diameter inches. The proposed grading for the site would result in the loss of four trees or 74 diameter inches of significant trees. The trees that would be lost include two cottonwoods and two pine trees. The replacement as per the City Code would be 36 diameter inches of trees. This would result in the planting of 12 three inch trees. The proposed landscape plan indicates that the developer is willing to plant a total of 23 trees. This in excess of the tree replacement calculations. The majority of the trees that are proposed for replacement are Marshall's green ash with a few Norway maple and Black Hill spruce making up the balance of trees. The landscaping plan indicates that the majority of the trees would be planted as an informal street scape. From an on site inspections and the site plans, it is indicated that there are number of small pine trees on the most westerly slope of the proposed development. Staff would recommend highly that the developer try to use these trees by moving them with a tree spade and using them either for screening along Baker Road or planting around the NURP pond in the northeasterly corner of the site. Utilization of these trees accomplishes two things, one instead of the trees being lost it provides some additional landscaping of the site, and two it is good faith gesture to the neighbors who would see these trees used rather than cut down. STORM WATER TREATMENT: The site grading for this project will incorporate the on site drainage being channeled into Outlot A in the northeasterly corner. This is the proposed site of the NURP pond that would have a V.A . i30- storage area of 1.8 acre feet. The NURP pond will drain east under Baker Road and exit into an existing storm water system. The storage of water prior to drain off will use the backyards of three lots in the Forest Knolls Subdivision, which currently collect water after heavy rains. The proposed construction of the NURP pond will not impact the drainage pattern of these lots anymore than what the current conditions represent. Outlot A would be dedicated to the City at the time of platting. SIDEWALKS/TRAILS: The staff does not feel that this street system is large enough to need a sidewalk or trail connection to Baker Road. However, there a couple of conditions that might change the need for this neighborhood to have sidewalks or trail connections. The first situation is that if Forest Hills Road were to become a through street along the southerly boundary of the property, it would make sense to incorporate a trail or sidewalk along that roadway. Number two, if Candice Lane becomes extended to the south so that it incorporates more than the 19 lots that are currently proposed, it may be necessary to expand the sidewalk network to provide safe pedestrian passage. The developer was asked by the neighbors to provide a 20 foot wide drainage/utility easement between Lots 6 and 7, block 1. This area could be used for a sidewalk connection between Candice Lane and Theresa Place. However, the staff would not recommend installation of a sidewalk connection between these two streets because of the lack of a connecting sidewalk. For a complete overview of the sidewalk/trail network in the surrounding neighborhoods, please refer to the attached map. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission July 10, 1995 and passed with unanimous vote. The staff would recommend approval of the project based on the conditions outlines in the Community Development Staff Report dated July 7, 1995 and the recommendations of this staff report. Forest.memo/Stuart A .- I�b 42 T C10141111 RIM CREEK ' • rsH N a!f r ISI b I"' RK[K SO p1' IA#.` t , .M 1'yg1/•I IiA �wr p/�,(.. ;t;'1`a -- I ,r.r ,. •,•! �I, Itl Inl .. • Inl bn aQ/VW Iln "r YIY6sp< � . y I EE6 • ql, • f (11 Inl � �. ••SS r.l r: F J , f • SIRAIFORO RD moig ...s .... _a.i �— •ii •r <» baLa_Y, f•.ir' ��.usl '�; 'qn 191 " r:�n lil sJ,#1:i,# . # � i •YI • ,� .' ��. r I•fl./ I�•�: ••;Jfl .} u'N lul Y •�ro ••li , - __-��' Yr. �r l l . w .Sp�d�/t✓.� ''{', 'r tii+ yy ' � •'.'+; I °rf,•'b'� .r r `ivl �j.lt'1 \, ±. S e I:Ir,, � + \\..� ///�♦°pt{a/; ii: N lAl - < -cif-'- ILI glnl .. . I� `;i'✓ +!.'h j - fA . ,j'Ixl. :1 i.. g• i rsi� n . �T' \ I � , �I/' rn3is — t�• 1 r 1 �li'.'r # u» F 7 ,� �'°. • 'n .ry '�' 5+1,•..,[yr'/•, I ,i S�� I T SSE-! `• w' ; '/ t•n �q t"� Jss# �a un--•�' 1 ,+ • � .i» � ,ern Iwo � .•;nr I CaS I\/ ,�'3. � � � �a!'' C 1,• i { ;.i, `a♦ s� # °," � •i 15. ! [✓iA:r t Of tin 2:� )' HOI.LY , w... er .IR T , " ii •• ulq/u .��(' .� ,'I� :: .. r' ... ' —RO. _ i.-!rr•. r' �E `#�•�� r �®� F FLLQ �I Cl • ' = I1L f )I` Lr. di,• ., t I r , ..1: tar[ ,,,, , � - .•' , ; 9 .. �� ', ` i � :,, # - ..., ,_S.._ e - ,», •g• a a GAF - S' - 40 4,. \ n. ,Ys _— j�.._—:r��-----+-� a � ,�_sr•_ •Y dl „ •,.,. , �,' ,f I , r ill J ,sy , a n li•, ROSLfI#Ri• '` s!• s I:n 4 Inr •1 r e IkCS t1 COURT.', Y 3 ,i,SECOPlD 3 ADDG!. yrll q Y i Ivt aa\�' el• , I r a' <IL•- t� .gyp f' 4� _1 # C��•' \+" x» i •' o: . a - a sa�' LS �•,-> f „� �� »I a s l.n 5 :.� • `E IN r• Inl = ,I 1 ' In dln 't;ul �o• :�i o �Mtn 2 u„»t:o tea tlroi� ` 9 A y r 1,1 lil■ ' ,,, #� Iwl r It11 1'w• �i � Irn _ r Fr nr GaF � ':1 x•. -' 'f�la - �'• In .: twl ,f MIY l• ., "y` '»• ml a;E~ tin �' e I„1 e: " �!4 .,' "., t' IHI fra irf`Y , S' r .. Irn a p9 •n[I • � . . •, , -1 on r. "•'•: I 1 s .+, Ian lin- Irw- oo Inl •�Ni . p„�blry, ,u, 4.. ,7 � r t,• ,r.•: ' q � YI" 1il 1 � » IAI fql ui�•�• R Inl •, ,1,�, ' dn,:• uir• �'r IAI IAItKT',. I,n» � r •� lilt , 1 ft:l as n b ,• ,, Itri + .. I ♦ Irrl� .^ �• T � ` Iil G • rf , rr)1 ' Iml b (n:•.. 1i Im � #' .S , ', ff, Im - a ," �rsr— Inl i 1 un' my 1°^', •Inl , nn 7.u•1 i al C ,,. ..a. [ � •• ' Q Q b sal i S ,qIR •. n E un fm, ♦ r. ,a,n q "1'C HILL RO y nn rl<m sue. ,irl }' 41nr �s� • I"' ORF' . , e F ISO TOIwl»r'Ln1 _on a I Ln b /] Irel♦r• .� .1b1 INI! N •� I,n�, ft(`;n INI Itr I r R • /. •� •. •'.b IHI. 0 r,rJ "•,1 r <<..rv- ry�CC . r ' ' .. ,. \ ,r •r.x • Inl t 1 • �IAIy• , •A„ 1 r ,� . #Sh • rf,)' 1>I a� ..•., ' I,n. ±AI sm, nn •.Ia•: SI•'1 y,•'� r In... .......•..� ; f , • x , ^ •. , " Ini�. • un o r var s. * t>rl �• �`M..•» t ®'�r}�jMM/•,� �.^s••1„1 •Inl -IYI"S ,,[ _[41` : ' •r� u ... - • ,r•1 .. Ib YV Y W� , (mr~ .r .� • a•" .f#t1� Irrr 1�• I': � •��,�f�•r .,„ : , < # y�r,,, •r,ny .. w � ,,:. Jn� ,• �� <.r t� � yv,.r,_ �°Y t.r F, Is, `Or Ain 2H •.� flan klnl ryMI� IAIi(-.r irllf+,,. .It,l l>� _ Irl1 - 4i_\ ,•.r. / [� N r � • �/�L� ( j C s• mnr. r Hrall:• l,''. r �. +....' rr , ® I•, I ��• t � r ♦_a � �+»... awl ANN—"_ �� 1#i'�;ii • ': .i�1-# ` �lin � Im 6 � ��# I '�•""{!�•f0 � C•.-Ys: Iw Ir.� le _ •s„...,, .1- ,gin ur'a[n a ,In #eta Q \ ..., b. '—�I ;,f ,9�'•' Inl"Jle•r! r• ._a'trlfl'...-_ #:': }.;�:�ie�5� +� 'F Irm.#nr.e� A:. Ir�r,..� > -"[lnrnv!-r. t`�'e n.. IN4r..,.� -�e-'--�..-... •-=$i�'"�'-' -. Irn,_`�' •i•,s �� � rm t or19# I � ''F`- A'» un "�j,°s 1 m „�''•.�6ii` : ao j' r.r' IK �t ;` , -7 s. �•i• - ' ,• _ n. y��[[ Ctl ,„3�'1' ,.r ,)1 •��'• r �-�. '��' '� t, I`i =prrr� , 11 1,1 r � / p' , '' " C ; VP� 6 I�•--yY' .: , •� I s e ww'3.is >\•.1•�r.. .1 d r ' w � �k`n •!. / •.. i Y0 � '•—'_—�'�. ;.�+�si� ;?} \,�.+•`f !� I:# Ir:, < [s/♦�� ;,•.���;1 ae^:r ♦ _...�yil q •�,r ,t♦, 7z�`.•`f�� r:- .1 '>r a �" • p1:3#•.�cl. i I ,� ,/ f "r Sf. :::� # 'Y Iy � .���P.`'�aa•'.sue 1 � In' II 't 1•H 1 P�W`�� ® I I �[ s r ��• w •�': QO y�y,,' ..,..r:, ° •-�,•••4'• ^,'.4�►> r I�.•m� �• ° '-., -1'- I I � I j x. V"r '"al'* 'VRV'�I-ram� '� •-'.r• ' tt " rn I In :n n n• ;j/. f y\lpr I y,6 'rn `• ��_� -. 1 r•e_kf`w.nt:el s�� I �4� �,lil � ' � /"'':.r »\ `»\ _ �r„ ••I�• n � 1 r �Off, 4,0 C C . STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Forest Hills 8th Addition APPLICANT: Duane Dietrich FEE OWNER: Duane Dietrich, Loreena Reiff, and Norman Franks LOCATION: West of Baker Road, South of Theresa Place REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into 19 lots. PL � a C Runt RNE sa Sao }CERR7) ST 'H 1 ROA S O. . W IU C SU ; FR;5T 5_ '-/ R - I q C Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition June 23, 1995 BACKGROUND This is a continued item from the June 12, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission directed the developer to submit a revised concept plan with no connection to Forest Hills Road, with one less lot on the west side, and with a location for a sidewalk or trail from Forest Hills Road to Theresa Place. REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN The revised development plan shows no connection to Forest Hills Road and removes one lot on the west end of the project. The total number of units in the project is 20. The lot sizes on the western edge of the project has been increased from an average of 16,000 sq. ft. to 17,630 sq. ft. A location for a sidewalk or trail would be along the south lot line of proposed Lot 1, Block 1, within City right-of-way along Lots 1 - 6, Block 1, and between Lots 6 and 7, Block 1. TRAFFIC The attached letter from Mike and Pam Zimmer on Kingston Drive is asking the Planning Commission to reconsider the decision on the Forest Hills Road connection, since it would alleviate traffic patterns they experience on Golf View and Kingston. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS If the Planning Commission is comfortable with revised plans as proposed, then a course of action would be to recommend that the project be continued until the July 10, 1995 meeting with direction that the developer provide the required information on grading, drainage, utilities, storm sewer, landscaping, tree replacement, and sidewalks. 2 C � STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: June 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Forest Hills 8th Addition APPLICANT: Duane Dietrichs FEE OWNER: Duane Dietrichs, Loreena Reiff, and Norman Franks LOCATION: West of Baker Road, South of Theresa Place REQUEST: 1. Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 on 9.1 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 9.1 acres into 20 lots. a N a � • . _ :sue �r � c Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition June 9, 1995 BACKGROUND In April, the developer submitted a complete set of plans including a preliminary plat, grading plan, tree inventory, utility plan, and storm water pretreatment plan. After the neighborhood meeting, the developer and City Staff decided it would be better to proceed to the Planning Commission in two phases. The first meeting would be for a review of the concept plan and to provide direction to the developer on density, lot size, and road connections. Based on direction by the Planning Commission, the developer would prepare the required information for a preliminary plat, grading plan, tree inventory, utility plan, and storm water pretreatment plan for review at a later time as determined by the Planning Commission. DENSITY, LOT SIZE, AND TRANSITION TO SURROUNDING EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS The map on the next page shows the proposed Forest Hills 8th Development and surrounding existing neighborhoods. The map indicates density and average lot size. The density of the proposed Forest Hills 8th Addition is 2.2 units per acre. When reviewing projects next to existing neighborhoods, the City evaluates the need for transition. Edenvale 6th Addition (1973) and Forest Hills 2nd Addition (1975) were approved with lots smaller than R1-22 (22,000 sq. ft.). A more recent example of a project approved next to an existing R1-22 neighborhood would Starview Terrace on Victoria Drive. The existing Rl- 22 lots average 1 acre in size and the abutting R1-13.5 lots average 17,335 sq. ft. When the Forest Hills 8th Addition was reviewed at a Neighborhood meeting, residents expressed concern about the degree of transition between 13,500 sq. ft. minimum lot sizes and existing R1-22 lots which range from 1/2 acre to 1 acre in size. In response to this concern, the developer revised the preliminary plat increasing the lot sizes from 13,500 sq.ft. to a 16,000 sq-ft. average for abutting lots on the west side. On the north end, the number of lots abutting (3) is the same as the plan presented at the Neighborhood meeting, but the lot sizes are different. The original plan had an abutting lot size of 20,230 sq. ft. but including more ponding in each lot. The current plan has an abutting lot size of 13,500 sq.ft. If Outlot A (pond) is included, the equivalent lot size is 24,730 sq.ft. 2 v. A . - ig C C Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition June 9, 1995 Staff believes that the current plan provides a better transition than the previous plan. It is a better transition than the Edenvale 6th Addition, next to existing R1-22 lots. To make lot sizes larger at the perimeter, lot size variances are needed for lots closer to Baker Road (Lots 2, 7, 9, Block 2.) Staff believes that the smaller lots should be considered as a trade-off for providing a better perimeter transition. ROAD CONNECTIONS When the Edenvale 6th Addition was reviewed by the City, residents to the north in the Kings Court neighborhood opposed the connection of Kingston Drive. The City Council approved the road connection so that the Golf View Drive and Kings Court neighborhoods would have a 2nd access. Forest Hills Road was required to be extended to the undeveloped property to the east with the intent to connect to Baker Road. This road connection would distribute traffic evenly in and out of the neighborhoods and provide a quicker response time for emergency vehicles. When the Forest Hills 2nd Addition was reviewed by the City, the extension of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road was studied again. The City retained the services of RCM, Consulting Engineers, and in conjunction with Carl Jullie (City Engineer at the time) analyzed possible Forest Hills Road connections to Baker Road. These are outlined in the attached 1976 memorandum. Four possible road connections were studied. Alternative A was recommended. Balancing overall city needs for a road connection versus neighborhood desires for maintaining existing cul-de-sacs is a delicate matter. Road connections raise issues about increase in traffic, potential for cut-through traffic, and traffic speed. The connection of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road will change the traffic distribution patterns. There will be more traffic on Forest Hills Road and less traffic on Kingston Drive and Golf View Drive. Cut-through traffic should be minimal for the following reasons: The Forest Hills Road connection to Baker Road is indirect. Baker Road and Valley View Road are four-lane arterial roads designed to handle through traffic, more traffic, and traffic at higher speeds than either local residential streets or local residential collector streets such as Forest Hills Road, Golf View Drive, and Kingston Drive. This in conjunction with a signalized Baker Road/Valley View Road intersection, with protected left turn lanes, and the ability to make a right turn on red, make it more desirable for through traffic to use the arterial roads than local residential streets. 3 v A . - ►c� � c Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition June 9, 1995 The speed at which cars travel on roads is due to the individual driving the car and the design speed of the road. A road, such as Baker Road, with several lanes, gentle curves, and limited access points allows people to drive faster. Local streets, because of the narrower width, stop signs, sharp curves, multiple driveways, and intersections, make it more difficult to travel at a higher speed. Forest Hills Road will not connect on a straight line to Baker Road, and includes several turns. This indirect route helps slow down the speed of cars. There are alternative ways to connect Forest Hills Road to Baker Road. These include the following: 1. Connect Forest Hills Road to Theresa Place. This was the original proposal by the developer since Forest Hills Road and Theresa Place abut the property. 2. Connect Forest Hills Road to Baker Road opposite Arbor Glen Drive. This would require the removal of the Frank's household. 3. Connect Forest Hills Road to Baker Road according to the current plan This is where existing shared driveway is between Sutton property and the Reiff property. 4. Connect Forest Hills Road to Baker Road south of the Gersvick household. 5. Connect Forest Hills Road to Baker Road at both the Sutton entrance and an entrance farther to the south. The connection to Baker Road is beneficial for the following reasons: 1. It more evenly distributes traffic from the Golf View Drive and King Forest neighborhoods. 2. It provides an additional way for emergency vehicle access with a quicker response time. The current City Council policy is to eliminate unnecessary cul-de-sacs an to connect neighborhoods. Reasons for cul-de-sacs have been to save trees and wetlands; if the natural topography is too steep; or differences in land use, such as commercial next to residential. In this situation, none of these conditions exist. 4 V. zo c � Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition June 9, 1995 The original plan to extend Forest Hills Road directly east to Baker Road is not possible. The intersection would not be offset far enough to meet Hennepin County requirements. Hennepin County's preference is to align the intersections; however, this would require the removal of the existing Franks household. Access points further north on Baker Road from Arbor Glen are acceptable because site vision distance would meet county requirements. A Forest Hills Road connection to Baker Road south of Arbor Glen is possible but the site vision distance is not as good. Alternative road connections #4 and #5 would require approval from Hennepin County. This leaves Alternatives #1 and #3 as the best alternatives. In both situations, the amount of traffic increase on Forest Hills Road will be the same. Staff is comfortable with either alternative. DRAINAGE AND STORM WATER PRETREATMENT POND City code requires that projects pretreat storm water before discharge into the storm sewer system. The purpose of the pretreatment pond is to filter out sediments and pollutants such that cleaner water is sent in to wetlands, lakes, creeks and rivers. The size of the pond is based on the amount of water that drains from this subdivision, but also water that would naturally drain this way from other properties. The pond must be designed so that water does not back up into the existing backyards of the homes on Theresa Place. The flat topography and elevation of the pipe which drains water to the east under Baker road will impact the shape and size of the pond. The pond may have to be built larger and further to the south that what is conceptually shown on the plan. UTILITIES The Forest Hills 8th Addition can be served by the extension of sewer and water from Theresa Place. The vacant land area to the south must be served by the extension of sewer and water from near the Robert's Drive and Baker Road intersection. TREE PRESERVATION The first plan submitted by the developer included a tree inventory of all trees greater than 12" in diameter for shade trees and trees greater than 8" in diameter for coniferous trees. The amount of tree loss based upon the first grading plan was calculated at 37%. A revised grading plan has not been submitted at this time. Tree loss will be reevaluated and discussed with the next Staff Report. The Staff believes that additional trees will be saved along the west property 5 � c Staff Report Forest Hills 8th Addition June 9, 1995 line because the depths of the lots have been increased. This helps preserve site character, and provide a transition between adjoining neighborhoods. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Staff present the Planning Commission with the following alternative courses of action: I. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the density, lot size, transition and road connection plan as submitted, then one option would be to recommend that the project be continued until the June 26, 1995, meeting with a review to be scheduled with the City Council on July 18, 1995. The developer would be required to provide the necessary information for preliminary plat, grading plan, landscaping plan, tree inventory, utility plan, and storm water pretreatment plan. II. If the Planning Commission is not comfortable with the densities, lot size, transition and road connection plan as proposed, then one option would be to recommend that the project be continued to the June 26, 1995, meeting for a review of the concept plan. The Staff would recommend Alternative #1. j\m\reportsWoresthi.8 6 v. A. - ZZ CAREA DENSITY AVERAGE LOT SIZE 1 - Kings Court 1.2 DU/ACRE 32,000 SQ. FT. 2 - Forest Knolls 1.4 DU/ACRE 25,000 SQ. FT. 3 - Forest Hills 8th 2.20 DU/ACRE 14,500 SQ. FT. 4- Forest Hills 2nd 2.1 DU/ACRE 16,250 SQ. FT. 5- Edenvale 6th 2.42 DU/ACRE 12,000 SQ. FT. 6- Prairie View 1.65 DU/ACRE 22,000 SQ. FT. 7-Southgate 2.3 DU/ACRE 13,600 SQ. FT. 8 - Cardinal Creek 2.00 DU/ACRE 18,000 SQ. FT. 9- Arbor Glen 1.76 DU/ACRE 20,700 SQ. FT. 10- Arbor Glen 3.0 DU/ACRE 12,000 SQ. FT. HOLLY ROAD z - M W N Q R N RIVE >:A S AN D ♦ 3 � :v II �� KERRY /< 9. INTERLA EN I COURT HI L ROADO.MELODY Aq COURT ` • GEC -TH cc it C SUN ROBER'T c 41( Q � H SCOT Densit and L . ize O p, P° �` V. A. - 3 c4 1�1 � � �i►*��+�r qir � _ • ewe ■ �■ ���iC I� die, L � � i •�, ■ Win � • m We PM r mom MIA fill 119 an- Fi 8 � No �e �I ` PM HOLLY RO MUMMMA imam MINK co 9-0,10.MELODY ftT fit Its 1 III �p � li jtl �• L0 1 , �V1111111� �� � ��'•, �/ � � �Qi9P6 < �I MIA AOURT Oka ft- mom Et m "- n is Lqwl HOLLY ROAD wit m all M co sa ! a� � ICA 11 . JULY 11, 1995 JOANN MEYER 13695 THERESA PLACE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 Dear Sirs : This letter is directed to the City of Eden Prairie concerning the upcoming meeting on July 18, 1995 for the Forest Hills 8th Addition project. I still have some questions I feel have not been addressed with an answer. They are: 1 . In writing, I would like the final draft of what is proposed for the pond area and drainage ditch along the side of the back yards of homes on Theresa Place. 2 . What is the bottom line reason that the City of Eden Prairie insists on for the reason they are allowing 19 lots in this area rather than 14-16 lots? Why does the City of Eden Prairie feel it necessary to put so many lots in this area? 3 . In writing, I would like to know the plan for sewer and water and any assessments . Would there be any assessments to surrounding existing homes? Specifically, just where the sewer and water would come from and if this is going to involve any digging between homes . 4 . Just what and how is proposed for the keeping of the older clump of trees on this property up the hill close to Forest Hills Road? Thank You, oann Meyer v. A, - 3p ��- `^ . ~ Mr. Michael D. Franzen June 23, 1995 City Planner City Planning Commission Subject: Forest Hills 8th Addition We live at 7025 Mariann Drive which abuts the west side of the proposed development. The developer of this property at the June 12, 1995 Commission meeting proposed a plan of six lots of 175 foot length extending from the west boundary of the area to be developed . Our understanding of the purpose of extending the length of these lots by 25 feet, over a previous plan , was to allow for the retention of a natural tree screen consisting of a grove of 14 tall evergreens and 6 or 7 shade trees on approximately the back 30 feet of the new lots that would abut our lot. The trees extend across a substantial portion of our lot, and as such would also benefit new adjacent lots in the development. We feel that the preservation of these trees is critical in providing a satisfactory transistion for the new neighborhood with respect to our lot, and expressed this opinion at the June 12 meeting . The suggestion was made by a Commission member at this meeting to look into removal of ^ another lot at the west end of the development. It is our veiwpoint that, regardless of whether 5 or 6 lots extend across the west side, the preservation of these trees is essential for a satisfactory transistion between the new and the old neighborhoods, and that no plan for this development should be approved unless these trees are retained . Due to a previous commitment we will be unable to attend the Monday June 26, 1995 meeting . Please advise the Planning Commission of our position on the proposed development. Thank you. Sincerely, ---------------------_--_________ , Glenn Bowen Karen Bowen �y w^ r�. N N C June 20, 1995 Planning Commission and Council Forest Hill 8th Edition City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 THE EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT We are writing this letter to express our concern about the Forest Hill 8th Addition and the roads that are being built for it. We have been residents on Kingston Drive for three years. Shortly after moving in we realized what a busy road Kingston really is. After meeting other families on Kingston and Golfview Drive who shared similar concerns, we began to research the reason why: Kingston and Golfview have become a thoroughfare connecting Baker Road to Valleyview. We learned from our research and from the June 15, EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS article that Forest Hill Road was originally supposed to connect to Baker Road. This would have alleviated many of the traffic problems we are experiencing today. It was also stated in this article that there is not a major traffic problem to solve but, as a resident of this area,we would say, yes there is a traffic problem which need addressing. These neighborhoods are now filled with families with young children and we are extremely concerned at both the volume of traffic and the high rate of speed at which many people travel. Every day we see people speed through the stop sign in front of our home without even slowing down. We are afraid for the safety of our children. Now is the perfect opportunity to make a change in this neighborhood. 1. If making the Baker Road and Forest Hill Road connection would thin the traffic on Kingston and Golfview, please reconsider it. 2. If other options are being looked at, please consider the traffic problems our neighborhood is having. We need to look at options to slow down the traffic and discourage the use of Kingston/Golfview as a shortcut to Baker Rd. or Valleyview. We Strongly urge you to help make Kingston/Golfview a safer place to live. Respectfully, 11.k4k 41yq u� Mike and Pam eer 3923 Kingston Drive (612) 949-2352 cc: Michael Franzen VA . - 3 2 TOM & JOANN MEYER 13695 THERESA PLACE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 934-5813 DATE: MAY 7, 1995 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION OF EDEN PRAIRIE FROM: JOANN MEYER RE: PROJECT PROPOSED FOR FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION LOCATION: WEST OF BAKER ROAD SOUTH OF THERESA PLACE 1. We are still concerned about the run off area, and what is proposed for this area. There seems to be one too many lots too close to this area and not enough space for run off. Also, what about the run off gulley area running between the backyards of the existing homes on Theresa Place and the new development? Just how big an area will this entail or what will it look like? 2. At what height will the new homes be? Compared to the homes on Theresa Place? 3. Whatever happened to only having 14-16 homes at the most in this proposed area? Why does the city feel it necessary to squeeze in huge homes on such small lots? Look at Cardinal Creek--the homes are way too big for the lots--so out of proportion! The city will get taxes no matter what--can't we consider the esthetics of the area and the adjoining homes value for larger lots and privacy? Yes, we all know the builder is going to make money no matter what, but can we take into consideration the lot size in this issue, and how they butt up to the existing homes . 4. Explain again all about how the sewer and water will be connected and how this involves us. Any assessments and how they will be paid, and I would like to see this in writing not just told maybe this is how it will be done. 5. Explain how the county is involved in this project and just how the road will be done and how wide it will be and how the new road will affect the drainage area. 6. Will any landscaping be done around the drainage area and if anything is going to be done could everything be put in writing so we have it on file. 7 . If any flooding occurs from the drainage area, how will this be handled by the city and could this also be put in writing. (OVER) U, A , - 33 c c Forest Hill Petition The residents of Forest Hill Road request the City Planning Department let Forest Hill Road remain a cul-du-sac. This is a long established neighborhood and people purchased here because of the cul-du-sac. There are small children here and our concern is safety. We believe Golf View is serving quite adequately as the main exit to . Since Edenvale is completely developed except for the area under consideration (Forest Hill 8th Addition), the current traffic should be stable and the current exit pattern adequate. 13830 13890 13920 13925 �- 13950 13955 /t Q11 13985 14000 14015 V. A , - .34 c � 14030 14045 14060 ` r 14075 14090 14105 14120 � 14150 \ � V, A . - -35- 6970 Mariann Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 May 15, 1995 City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Dear Mr. Franzen: I am writing to you to express my dissatisfaction over the proposed Forest Hills 8th Addition. I am concerned with this proposed development for the following reasons: 1) Reduction in the beauty/aesthetics of the neighborhood by the addition of the 21 houses onto the 9 acre property. All of the surrounding properties have much larger lots, trees and spaciousness that gives the neighborhood great curbside appeal which is very important to those of us who reside here. 2) Influx of traffic due to the large number of homes in a small area and a proposed "through" street which will increase the number of vehicles traversing the neighborhood to save time. 3) Devaluation of our property and the other surrounding properties due to the introduction of high density housing on smaller lot sizes. I recommend that if the development must be built the number of lots be reduced or the lot sizes increased to maintain congruity with the rest of neighborhood. Also that a "through" street not be added but rather have an entrance to the addition from Baker Road which is completely terminated in cul-de-sacs. This should limit traffic to the residents of the new development or their visitors. I greatly appreciate anything that you can do to maintain the aesthetic, physical and economic integrity of our neighborhood. Sincerely, Dr. Laurie E. Lynch John C. Zachman V. A . - 3h May 7 , 1995 City Of Eden Prairie City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Mn. 55344-2230 Attention: Mr Michael D. Frazen City Planner This letter is in response to our neighborhood meeting held on Thursday May 4th, at which time you asked us for something to be submitted in writing to your office . The home owners and residents of lots that abut , or are in the vicinity of , a proposed Forest Hills 8th Addition Development hereby propose that the Eden Prairie Planning Commission and all other city officials with responsibilities relating to new developments to : (1 ) Maintain current low density zoning R1-22 for the entire area in question, but in any event , to limit any rezoning request for higher density R1-13 . 5 development to the southern-most portion of area now identified as parcel 4 providing; that in the event such request is granted that (a) all of the new home lots on parcel 4 must be closely comparable, or larger, in size and length with respect to the size and (b) the orientation of all of the new home lots must not detract from, or create an undesirable appearance, with respect to the character and appearance of the existing homes which now front on Forest Hills Road, and Theresa Place. (2 ) Reject any proposed plan for development of this area which does not ; a. establish a suitable transition between the established neighborhood and the new develop- ment with regard to abutting lot sizes ; i . by providing for a maximum abutment of four new home lots with the existing lots that abut the development along the north-south boundary line at the west end of the development area and which extend across parcels 1, 2 , and 3 . ii . by providing for a maximum abutment of three new home lots with the existing lots that abut the development along the east-west boundary lime at north end of the development , (inclusive of the v, 37 C C. lot common to both the north-south and the east- west boundary lines) , and which extend across parcel 1 . iii , by further providing that the abutting portion of any new home lot with any existing lot that abuts parcels 1 , 2 , or 3 may not be less in length , (parallel to the boundary lines) , than 150 feet , may not be smaller than 1/2 acre , (regardless of the zoning classification of the development area as a whole, or of any par- cel thereof) , and that no portion of more than two such new lots may abut any portion of any such existing lot . ( 3) . Maintain the existing cul-de-sac at Theresa Place, which is intended for such purpose, and provide for access to Baker Road either through a single dead-ended road into the development off of Baker Road or off of a segment of road along the eastern-most portion of the Forest Hills road easement , at a point that is no farther west from Baker Road than 300 feet . ( 4) . Establish a sewer plan that is consistent with the best in- terests of both existing and new residents and does not ad- versely impact city plans to provide for adequate sewer flow for the remaining undeveloped land in the vicinity. a . Pertaining to storm sewer , drainage of the street will be routed to the pond. The existing lots on Theresa Place bordering development to me p nt lots 12- and 13 have concerns of existing spring snow melt and storm sewer back up at present . This concern comes from over sized feed storm pipe entering the smaller storm pipe on Baker Road which causes the backup of storm water into proposed pond area flooding development lots 12 , and 13 . ( 5) . specifically reject Mr . Deitrich' s proposed development and any subsequent proposal that similarly fails to adequately take into consideration (a) existing neighborhood density and abutting lot sizes , or (b) appropriate sewer plan. Thank you for your consideration in regard to these existing neighborhood concerns . We appreciate your willingness to work with us and our concerns and the sensitivity in which the City Council has responded to these matters at the May 4th meeting . V. A . - 3S' c c. If there are any- other questions that you might have of me, or any other neighbors please feel fee to contact me directly . Sincerely Forest Hills 8th Addition Neighbors Mr. Larry Stimac 612-934-8048 u, A, - 39 r • r P E T E R S 0 N ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. May 3, 1995 Mr. Duane Dietrich 6600 City West Parkway, Suite 225 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Forest Hills Eighth Edition PEC Project No. 95-033 Dear Mr. Dietrich: Peterson Environmental Consulting Inc. (PEC) was retained to conduct a survey for the presence of jurisdictional wetlands on a five acre parcel located in NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Sec. 10, T.116N. R.22W, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Although the entire site was reviewed particular attention was paid to a low area that abuts Baker Road. The field survey was conducted on May 3, 1995 and consisted of systematically traversing the parcel in both an east/west and north/south direction. This revealed that no jurisdictional wetlands occur within the boundaries of the parcel The parcel consists of an old field type on gentle to steep slopes. The Soil Survey of Hennepin County (USDA 1974) indicates that this parcel consists of cut and fill land. Additionally, the Hopkins, Minnesota National Wetlands Inventory quadrangle does not list any wetlands on this parcel. Following is a list of the vascular plant species observed on the low area and the wetland indicator status they have been assigned according to the National List of Plant Species that.Occur in Wetlands' North Central Region 1. 1988. The species common name is followed by the scientific name and indicator status in parentheses. Species that are not followed by an indicator status either have not been reviewed by.the technical committee or are considered representative of upland conditions. Species include yellow bristle grass (Setaria glauca, FAC), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis, FAC-), smooth brome (Bromus inermus), and Canada,goldenrod (Solidago canadensis,FACU). Within the low area random soil pits were excavated to examine the soil for texture, color and presence of redoximorphic features. The soil pits revealed a profile of 0 to 8 inches of silty clay loam with a Munsel matrix color of 10YR 3/1 followed by 11 inches of silt loam colored 10YR 3/0 and 10YR 3/1. No redoximorphic features were observed within the soil profiles indicating the area does not remain saturated long enough to produce VA. - yo c c Mr. Duane Dietrich PEC Project No. 95-033 5/3/95 Page 2 anaerobic conditions within the upper part. Primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators were absent within the soil profile and were not observed above ground. In conclusion, a field survey of the five acre parcel conducted on May 3, 1995 did not reveal the presence of jurisdictional wetlands. The lack of hydric soils and wetland hydrological indicators combined with the predominance of vascular plant species that are associated with upland situations support the conclusion that this site is an upland site. Should questions arise concerning the above determination please contact Scott Krych at 831-8565. Best regards, Peterson Environmental Consulting,Inc. 4SC -clfi Project Manager cc: Randy Hedlund, Hedlund Engineering, Inc. V14 - y City of Eden Prairie of S-A City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Nela Phone(612) 949-8300 • TDD (612) 949-8399 Fax(612) 949-8390 July 6, 1995 Dear Resident: At 7:30 p.m. on July 18, 1995, a Public Hearing is scheduled in the City Council Chambers to discuss the Forest Hills 8th Addition. This is a single family subdivision of 19 lots. The development of this property involves a City decision on the extension of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road. During the process of reviewing the proposed subdivision at the Planning Commission, it has become apparent that the decision to make this connection is of interest to a larger neighborhood than has been involved with the review of the project to date. Therefore, a Neighborhood Meeting will be held at the Eden Prairie City Center on Tuesday, July 18, 1995, in advance of the City Council meeting. The meeting will be held in the Heritage Rooms 3 and 4. The meeting will start at 6:15 p.m. and end prior to the 7:30 p.m. City Council meeting. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss traffic issues on Golf View Drive and Kingston Drive, the connection of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road, and to bring all interested parties to the same information level before traffic issues are discussed at the City Council meeting. Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works, and Alan Gray, City Engineer, will be there for presentation, questions, and answers. If you have any questions about the proposed Forest Hills subdivision, please contact Michael Franzen, City Planner, at 949-8487. If you have questions regarding the Neighborhood Meeting on traffic issues, please contact Gene Dietz, Director of Public Works, at 949-8320 or Alan Gray, City Engineer, at 949-8310. Sincerely yours, OI (J Michael D. Franzen City Planner V�4. ~ yz Recycled Paper � c City of Eden Prairie City Offices 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Phone (612) 949-8300 • TDD (612) 949-8399 Fax(612) 949-8390 April 24, 1995 SUBJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING PROPOSED FOREST HILLS 8TH ADDITION DEVELOPMENT Thursday, May 4, 1995, 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers, Eden Prairie City Center Dear Resident: Mr. Duane Dietrich is holding a neighborhood meeting at the Eden Prairie City Center to discuss the proposed Forest Hills 8th Addition. Forest Hills 8th Addition is a single family project of 21 lots on approximately nine acres. If you have questions regarding the project or would like to see a copy of the proposed plan in advance of the meeting, please stop by the Community Development Department at the City Center. Sincerely Yours, — '�LQ 4 Michael D. Franzen City Planner BARB MUM ErrERSTIRLWHAES ® VA , 43 Recycled Paper EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-18-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V- g DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER Don Uram Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1 st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 9.46 acres; • Adopt a Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 9.46 acres into one lot and road right-of-way. Background: The Preserve Village Center was constructed in 1980 and little has been done to renovate it until now. Semper Development,Ltd. is proposing to demolish a portion of the building and construct a free-standing Walgreen's building. Semper Development was the developer of the Walgreen's at Co. Rd. 4 and Hwy. 5. They are proposing a complete renovation of the shopping center and parking lots. Most of the existing tenants will remain in the building. The proponent met with all the neighbors in the area and the existing tenants who support the project. All residents who attended the Planning Commission meeting were in favor of the project. Their concerns focused on the height of the new lights, the maintenance of the fence and buffer area and traffic issues relating to Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18. A lighting study has been done that indicates no off- site glare according to City Code. The proponent has stated that the fence and buffer areas will be renovated and maintained. The traffic issues raised by the neighborhood have been previously discussed when the public hearings were held for Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18 and were not related to this specific project. Staff received two phone calls in support of the project from tenants in the Bloomington commercial area across C.S.A.H. 18. No phone calls have been received in opposition. Staff expects that a few of the residents and tenants to be at the meeting Tuesday night. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 2. Staff Reports dated June 23, 1995 3. Planning Commission Approved Minutes of June 26, 1995 4. Correspondence PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER FOR SEMPER DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Preserve Village Center for Semper Development dated July 13, 1995, consisting of 9.46 acres, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of July, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk VS, - z. Exhibit A Legal Description Hartford Place - Office Depot Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie Lakes Business Park v. B. - 3 ApproJe- Fc - M;nw,its. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS C Jun2 2(, 19 gs- A. PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER by Semper Holding, Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 9.46 acres, Site Plan review on 9.46 acres and Preliminary Plat of 9.46 acres into one lot. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18. Howard Bergerud, developer, introduced John Kohler, architect for the project who reviewed the project with the Planning Commission. He noted that the site is about 9 1/2 acres. It's unique because it's a two step process that takes into consideration, Anderson Lakes Parkway as it exists today, and the future design for Anderson Lakes Parkway with C.S.A.H. #18 upgrading. The proposal is to demolish the north end of the building, which is 24,000 square feet, and construct a 13,905 square foot free-standing Walgreens. Overall, this would reduce the square footage. The buildings and parking areas meet the minimum setbacks required in the C-COM zoning district. The design depicts 378 usable parking spaces and 40 proof-of-parking spaces. Per staff recommendation, 7 additional stalls will be placed in proof-of-parking to improve circulation. Clinton was concerned about access to the west when leaving Walgreens parking lot. Bergerud replied that you would have to utilize the frontage road. Clinton asked if the hardware store would be relocated or would it disappear completely. Bergerud replied that the hardware store would no longer be there. Wissner was concerned about where the tenants would be while the renovation is taking place. John Kohler, architect, replied that everybody is going to remain as they are, or they will be moving around a little bit. They all have exterior entrances, so those on the outside may shift around. Wissner expressed concern about the tenants continuing business while the renovation is taking place. Bergerud replied that everyone will be able to continue their business, and they are all very pleased that the renovation is taking place. Schlampp was concerned about whether actual arrangements have been made with the tenants. He was concerned about their businesses not surviving. Bergerud replied that here is a space for every tenant and there is a little extra space right now. Every tenant will have a space during the renovation. Uram commented that the City welcomes this project because the shopping center really needs to be renovated. The City is concerned about the businesses economically. This is a very good step in the right direction. Staff is recommending approval subject to the recommendations in the Staff Report. John Lunzer, residing at 9702 Clark Circle expressed concern about the lighting standards. He was also concerned about the yard and drainage area on the other side of the fence. He said it is faulty and needs repairs. It's part of the center property. v. g, - y c � Uram noted that one of the requirements for the Staff Report were to have all the utilities inspected and repaired if necessary. After analysis of the situation, if repairs are needed, it would be the responsibility of the developer. Staff will also do an analysis of the pole height to see what kind of illumination they can get, and they are proposing to have bronze, 25 foot high, downcast, cut- off luminars pointing downward. Bergerud commented that they will be taking care of all necessary repairs like a fence, or a retaining wall that needs to be put in. All of those things will be part of the renovation for the center, inside, outside and to the property itself. Royal Provost, residing at 9622 Clark Circle, expressed concern about the height of the lighting and the downcast. He was concerned about people on the back end of the property looking over the berm, and having to look at those lights. He also expressed concern about the traffic situation on Garrison Way. Foote asked if there was any other way out of that neighborhood other than Anderson Parkway. Uram replied that that's the only way out. Jane Larson, residing at 9672 Clark Circle, expressed concern about the lighting standard. Right now she gets the lights from the shopping center in her bedroom window, and there's noise from the parking lot. She would like to see the lights come down from 25 feet. Even if they are pointed down, it will still shine in her rooms and yard. She also expressed concern about the foot traffic at the property line from C.S.A.H. #18 across the vacant lot and through the easement. She suggested a fence be put in to eliminate the foot traffic. This is also a security issue and noise issue for her. She was concerned about the people that speed in that area. Dave Oliver, residing at 9661 Clark Circle, was concerned about the truck deliveries early in the morning. He suggested that Walgreens take the center and the other tenants take the ends. He feels this would eliminate the traffic problem. Bergerud indicated that Walgreens today works only with free-standing buildings. The reason they do this is because they now have drive-thru windows for people to pick up prescriptions. They need to be able to have transportation go around the building. Foote noted that he drove over there and was concerned that people have a hard time exiting. Schlampp was pleased to see the renovation take place, but was concerned about the small tenants. C Cindy McKee, owner of Snips Salons noted that she was very excited about the renovation. Many of her clients have commented about the condition of the mall. She was concerned about the lighting conditions in the back being unsafe for her employees to leave. Clinton shared the concerns about the physical condition of the mall, that it needs to be upgraded. He also agrees with the lighting conditions not being safe, and also shares the concerns with the neighbors about the lights shining in their homes. He was also concerned about the traffic getting in and to the residential area, versus getting traffic in and out of the retail. Ismail expressed concern about the lighting conditions, and suggested studies to be done around the surrounding area. Uram indicated that Staff will require the developer to do a lighting analysis. City Code requires that there be no offsite glare. Staff will do what is necessary. The traffic analysis has been done, and he just needs to find out the results. He will put a copy in the packets or write a memo for the Commission regarding the results. Kardell feels that the project is definitely needed, and very much likes the feature of the drive-thru. She does not think this project exasperates the traffic situation. This project is not adding traffic, but reducing the density on the site by about 10,000 square feet. She would like updates of the traffic studies that have been done there. Foote asked if there would be stoplights at the frontage road. Uram replied that there will be a signal there. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, seconded by Schlampp, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Wissner moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Semper Holding, Inc. for Zoning District Amendment in the Community Zoning District on 9.46 acres based on plans dated June 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995, and that a lighting study be done on the lighting for the parking lot for the shopping center. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 3: Wissner moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Semper Holding, Inc. for Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres based on plans dated June 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995, and that a lighting study be done. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 4: Wissner moved, seconded by Schlampp, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Semper Holding, Inc. for Preliminary Plat on 9.46 acres into 1 lot based on plans dated June 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995, and that a lighting study be done. Motion carried 6-0-0. V. C STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Donald R.Uram,Economic Development Manager DATE: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Preserve Village Center Renovation APPLICANT: Semper Development,Ltd. LOCATION: Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18 REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the C-COM Zoning District on 9.46 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 9.46 acres into one lot. v, • 1 • 1t' off JIM FA wm Sm .�: � ■���� � ■ .,�,�-� III! . h1I � �.M *01 ■ �' east ifs •� �, ■■fir •�• , •:- c � BACKGROUND This site was previously zoned Community Commercial in 1979 for a 78,330 square retail shopping center. The largest tenant in the center is Jerry's NewMarket occupying approximately 36,000 square feet and a number of smaller tenants. Semper's proposal is demolish the north end of the building(24,000 square feet) currently occupied by Rexall Drug,Ben Franklin's and the hardware store and construct a 13,905 square foot free-standing Walgreen's. Developing plans for the site was complicated due to the proposed realignment of Anderson Lakes Parkway in conjunction with the upgrading of C.S.A.H. 18. Because of this,the plans show both the renovation of the shopping center with the roads in their existing locations and with the roads realigned. The reconstruction of this intersection should be completed by Fall 1996. PRELIMINARY PLAT The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 9.46 acres into one lot which meets the minimum lot size requirement in the Community Commercial Zoning District of 5 acres. Due to the highway taking, the site will be reduced to 9.13 acres. The plat should be revised to reflect the new road alignment by dedicating the right-of-way. SITE PLAN The site plan depicts the construction of a one-story, 13,905 square foot free-standing Walgreen's, the renovation of the existing building facade and resurfacing the parking areas. Overall, there will be a total of 68,234 square feet remaining in the center. This is a reduction of 10,096 square feet. Based on a land area after the highway taking of 9.13 acres, a Base Area Ratio(BAR)of 17%has been calculated. The maximum BAR in the Community Commercial zoning district is 20%. The buildings and parking areas meet the minimum setbacks required in the C-COM zoning district. Walgreen's is proposing a two lane drive-thru to service pharmacy customers. Exiting the drive-thru requires that cars circle around the back of Walgreen's and drive between the two buildings. The distance between the two buildings is 32 feet with a 14 foot,one-way drive lane. Use of the drive- thru lanes is minimal. Only 10%of the pharmacy pick-ups(10-20) are made throughout the day. Parking required is calculated using a ratio of six parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on 68,234 square feet,410 parking spaces are required. The Site Plan depicts 378 usable parking spaces and 40 proof-of-parking spaces. Proof-of-parking is reasonable due to the actual amount of parking necessary for Walgreen's projected at 30 to 40 parking stalls. This number is consistent with the number of stalls provided for the Walgreen's located at Co. Rd. 4 and Hwy. 5. 2 V. c � ACCESS Until Anderson Lakes Parkway is realigned, access into this site will not change from its current configuration. After the realignment, access will be provided by a right-in only and two full driveways off of the new C.S.A.H. 18 frontage road. The center driveway accesses directly into the parking lot creating potential traffic conflicts. Staff recommends that the parking stalls in direct conflict be made proof-of-parking and an end island constructed(see attached.) Constructing an end island will reduce the number of available parking spaces by 7 to 371. GRADING AND DRAINAGE This site has been previously graded. Minor grading is necessary to prepare the site for the building pad. There is a small slope area to the rear of Jerry's that is eroding that needs to be restored with this project. The City requires pretreatment of storm water before leaving the site. Since most of the shopping center was built prior to current NURP standards, staff suggests that a cash equivalent contribution to the storm water utility fund be required. The cash contribution is calculated based on 2%of the land cost and$1,000 per acre for impervious surface payable at time of building permit issuance. UTILITIES There are existing utilities on the property for sanitary sewer and water connections. Additional catch basins will be installed for the collection of storm water at the western-most driveway. Staff recommends that the existing utilities inspected and repaired if necessary. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required for this project is based upon a caliper inch according to building square footage,and screening of parking and loading areas. The landscape plan meets City requirements. A total of six mature trees that are within the construction area will be transplanted on the south property line for screening. The proponent has indicated that they will attempt to transplant four additional trees that are proposed to be removed. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The proposed Walgreen's will be constructed out of face brick and glass. The brick will match the existing face brick on the shopping center. The same brick detailing and accent band will also be used. Colored awnings are proposed for Walgreen's and the north end of the shopping center. The remainder of the shopping center will be renovated and updated with new windows and doors, removal of wood on the sign band and replacement with stucco,consistent signing and painting and repairing. d c � All mechanical equipment on the roof will be screened by a metal panels. SIGNS This site is permitted to have two pylon signs provided that they are 300 feet apart. The size of the signs shall not exceed 80 square feet for one and 36 square feet for the other: The proposed signs meet the size requirement. Sign locations must be shown on the plans. Tenant wall signs are permitted on the exterior elevation of the building. Building elevations indicate a designated sign band. A detailed sign program should be submitted including letter size, style and colors for review. A coordinated sign program would improve the appearance of the center. City staff considers lettering, logos, and lighted awnings to be signs. Details for the awnings must be submitted for staff review. LIGHTING The existing parking lot lighting will be replaced with bronze, 25 foot high, downcast, cut-off luminars. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS With the road realignment, an 8 foot bituminous trail will be constructed on the west side of the C.S.A.H. 18 frontage road. A connection has been made from the sidewalk in front of Walgreen's to this trail. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Community Development Staff would recommend approval of the request by Semper Development, Ltd. for a Zoning District Amendment within the C-COM Zoning District on 9.46 acres, Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres and the Preliminary Plat of 9.46 acres into one lot based upon revised plans dated June 12, 1995 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Council review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the preliminary plat by indicating the dedication of right-of-way for the Anderson Lakes Parkway realignment. B. Reduce the widths of all external driveways to a maximum of 30 feet per City code. 4 V. r3, - Ii c c C. Revise the plans to reflect the code requirement for parking stalls measuring 9'by 19', with a 25'driveway. D. Construct and landscape an end island at the westernmost full driveway to eliminate any potential traffic conflicts. E. Submit a detailed tenant sign program including letter size, style and colors. 2. Prior grading permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 3. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit a final landscape plan and security to cover the cost of the landscaping for review and approval by the City. B. Submit final plans for review and approval by the Fire Marshal. C. Submit samples of exterior materials and colors for review and approval by the City. 4. Concurrent with building permit issuance, proponent shall pay a NURP pond fee based on 2%of the land cost and$1,000 per acre for impervious surface. 5. Concurrent with grading on the site, the eroding slope behind Jerry's should be restored. This restoration may require the use of a retaining wall. V. B. - Z . l_aL_J 1 SOD. 00 TING r;SOD •t• �� �� ��' E lit 1 NEW END ISLAND C t _._. 10, >1rt�sis'sf�'a1i+�s*�>•>•Iis+;l�Ia>.1 �>•aesti �' ♦4 9 �♦ � / 4� 41� i "' cos *410♦ p Israrasss:lasaaaalsts>tsatasssrssm►�s�► s'S�s�4 10 >> .rsrraarrslse:rr+rerarr+r>•r =rrrr=ssa:;.rrarr+r> VIQ, - 13 Vote, KI Rexall Drug = Ben Franklin Coast-to-Coast June 29, 1995 Lawn&Garden 7 Ski&Sport Shop Hallmark/Film Shop Highway 7& 101 Minnetonka.MN 55345 474-5266 To: Tenants of Preserve Village Center Mall As all of you are aware, the Eden Prairie' Planning Commission Preserve approved the proposed development plan submitted by Semper Rexall Drug Holdings, Inc. The plan must now go before the Eden Prairie Ben Franklin City Council. The first meeting with the City Council is Hardware Hank scheduled for Jul 18 and proposal like this must be Lawn&Garden Y any 9611 Anderson Lakes Parkway presented at two City Council meetings. Until the first meeting Eden Prairie,NIN 55344 with the City Council, we will not know when (or if) the second 941-4900 City Council hearing will take place. —e In part because of my efforts with Semper, you should be WAYZATA receiving lease proposals shortly. As I previously explained to ongamoo you, the rumors about all the tenants being evicted were not Wayzata Rexall Drug true and some of you actually contributed to these rumors with 1125 Wayzata Blvd. incorrect information being widely discussed. Colonial Square Center 473-7323 Unfortunately, I now understand from my employees that some of Plants Wayzata Hardware you are telling customers (of yours and mine) that this is a Peacock Alley "done deal" and the hardware store will be gone in a matter of tt39onialS Wayzata are weeks. I have and will continue to fulfill m obligation to you Colonial Square Y g 473-8000 as your landlord and as outlined in my previous letter. Community Rexall Drug I do expect, however, that you act responsibly during this Ben Franklin P Y P Y g 831 E. Lake St. possible transition. As explained to all of you, some type of Wayzata Bay Center renovation or remodelling will be done to The Preserve Village 473-7373473-4251 Mall. We are currently working on a good plan and making Wayzata Implement Co. progress. However, nothing has been finalized and Supplee County Road 6 & 101 Enterprises, Inc. does not have any agreement with Walgreen's Plymouth, MN 475-2554 (nor have we had any discussion with them) . If this plan does not go through the City or other matters are not finalized, I "Lobby Shop" will continue to operate my stores and we will explore other 3701 Wayzata Blvd. options for the shopping center. Prudential Bldg.—Mpls. 374-2433 I understand that your customers and employees are curious or Corporate Offices anxious about these possible changes and they are asking you 4806 Hwy. 101 So. questions. All that I am asking of you is that you give them Minnetonka, MN 55345 474-6255 complete information. Yes, there are proposed changes, but these have not been finalized and may not take place. If the changes go through, there may not be room for my hardware store. Until this happens however, I fully expect to continue to operate my stores. You all know when the first City Council meeting is, but there are several things that must be worked out before anything is final and any transition will take some time. Tenants of Preserve Village Center Mall — 2 Remember, we share many of the same customers and have succeeded over the years by working together. If you unintentionally chase away some of my customers by giving them incomplete information, you may also be chasing away some of your own business. I do not think that this is an unreasonable request. I will continue to update you with information (including key dates) as it becomes available. Sincerely, Dick Gibson DG/rdw To: Mall Shop Tentants at the Preserve Village Center As promised, I intend to provide you with as much information as possible about the proposed improvements at the Preseve Village Center. It is unfortuate that you have received information (much of it incorrect) from various sources and rumors. The City of Eden Prairie has acknowledged that they have provided the wrong information to people about this project. In the first place, there are no plans to evict any of the current mall shop tenants. As many of you know, several tenants have leases that run to the end of this year or beyond. In fact, all of the leases extend beyond August 1, 1995 (so it is impossible for anybody to "to get rid of the tenants" by August 1, 1995. ) It is our understanding that the City was responsible for this rumor and any frustration arising from this rumor should be directed to the city. The plan that was submitted of the city regarding the mall shop space was not correct. The mall shop space shown on the plan was "empty" because the plans for the mall have not been finalized. However, it has always been the plan to continue the mall shop tenants in the project. This is not only the plan, but a reality in view of the fact that many of you have leases for your space running into future years. We met today with the real estate group we are working with (Semper Development) and would like to meet with each one of you to discuss this project. This will. allow you to meet the real estate group and provide us with your imput as to the improvements to the Shopping Center. A representative of Semper, Darcy Winter, will be contacting each of you to schedule a meeting at a time convenient to you. Either myself or Rick Gibson will also be present at the meeting. As part of this meeting, we will also be presenting drawings or plans for the "mall" portion of the Shopping Center. More importatntly, we intend to discuss with you arrangements for both short term lease concerns and long term lease arrangements. I have been a landlord to some of you for many years and have always tried to treat you fairly. I think it reasonable for me to ask you to give us a chance to provide you with the correct information and allow you to participate in this process in an informed basis. As you know, there is a planning commission meeting scheduled for June 26, 1995, and I would request your cooperation in finding a time to meet with us as soon as possible. Sincerely, Dick Gibson RWG/jrg V, g. - 1(0 C HennepInCounty An Equal Opportunity Employer W4 June 14, 1995 Michael Franzen City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Proposed Plat - Preserve Village Center CSAH 18, southwest quadrant CSAH 18 and Anderson Lakes Parkway Section 24, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 2242 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Franzen: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • The proposed plat is within the construction limits of Hennepin County Project No. 9036. The developer should contact Dave Schmidt, P.E., at 930-2532 for project information and coordination. • The right of way needed for CSAH 18, as shown on the Overlay Plan dated April 26, 1995, appears adequate. If there are any questions please contact Mr. Schmidt. • All access from the plat to CSAH 18 must be via Anderson Lakes Parkway. Hennepin County will not permit any new access to CSAH 18. • All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for the appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way, disturbed during construction. Department of Public Works 320 Washington Avenue South Recycled Paper Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 (612) 930-2670 FAX:(612) 930-2513 TDD:(612) 930-2696 v. B. - 17 c �. Michael Franzen June 14,1994 Page 2 Please direct any response to Doug Mattson. Sincerely, Thomas D. J nson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ/DBM J 1. th -RileY gPur atory-Bluff Creek Watershed District Engineering Advisor:Barr Engineering Co. ... 8300 Norman Center Drive 4 nine sq, Suite 300 Minneapolis,MN 55437 832-2600 Legal Advisor: Popham,Haik,Schnobrich&Kaufman 1969 - 1994 3300 Piper Jaffray Tower 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis,MN 55402 333-4800 June 12, 1995 Mr. Chris Enger City Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 RE: Preserve Village Center Addition in Eden Prairie Dear Mr. Enger: The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley - Purgatory- Bluff Creek Watershed District have reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the District for the Preserve Village Center Addition in Eden Prairie. The following policies and criteria of the District are applicable for this project: 1. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's revised rules and regulations, a grading and land alteration permit from the District is required. A detailed grading plan showing both eidsting and proposed contours must be submitted to the District for review. 2. A detailed erosion control plan outlining procedures to control sedimentation from leaving areas altered on the site must be submitted to the District for review and approval. 3. A stormwater management plan for the project must be submitted for review and approval. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this development at an early date. If you have any questions or request additional information, please give me a call at 832-2857. Sincerely, C� ober C. Obermeyer�I � Barr Engineering Company Engineer's for the District c: Mr. Ray Haik Mr. Fritz Rahr Q:\DOCS\26716_1\YMH / I Q V. IS, ! I EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-18-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. C . DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger HARTFORD PLACE - OFFICE DEPOT Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • lst Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 4.43 acres; • Adopt a Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 4.43 acres. Background: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the Office Depot proposal at the June 26, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission approved this site development plan as an alternative to the approved plan for an office building and two restaurants. The approval was based upon the recommendations in the Staff Report. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for PUD Concept 2. Staff Report dated June 23, 1995 3. Planning Commission Approved Minutes of June 26, 1995 4. Correspondence V. C HARTFORD PLACE - OFFICE DEPOT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF HARTFORD PLACE - OFFICE DEPOT FOR RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Hartford Place - Office Depot PUD Concept by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on July 18, 1995; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Hartford Place - Office Depot, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated July 13, 1995. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated June 26, 1995. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of July, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk v. C. - Z- KKroveg PC M..r.r..Aes J,Art. Z(.1 19 9 S C. HARTFORD PLACE - OFFICE DEPOT by Ryan Construction Company. Request for Site Plan review on 4.43 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 4.43 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 4.43 acres. Location: Lot 2, Block 1, Prairie Lakes Business Park. Franzen noted that Ryan Companies is requesting the Planning Commission to approve an alternative plan for the development of Site 1, of the Hartford Place project. The approved plan was for two small restaurants and an office building. The current proposal is for a 30,000 square foot Office Depot. This is a site that has a Commercial Zoning. This is a site that can be done office, restaurant or general retail. Staff is comfortable with either use of the property. Janine Crone, of RLK, reviewed the alternative plan and the approved plan. She noted that the new plan building is taller that the one already approved, and for that reason there will be more trees on this site. There will be 187 caliber inches, and on the approved plan there was 127 caliber inches. Two 6 foot retaining walls in the back will be needed to make the grade on this site. Ryan Construction has agreed to replace the existing City sanitary sewer pipe with a 10 inch iron pipe which would be required for the extra fill. The architecture will remain the same on the outside as previously approved. Staff recommended a rooftop mechanical screening plan with a 3 foot high parapet wall. Ryan Construction's architect came up with another alternative. They proposed that a screening wall to enclose all the mechanical equipment. That wall would be 5 feet tall. The advantage of this would be that it would not be visible from Prairie Center Drive. It would establish screening and would also avoid making the building look taller than it already is, which is v C.. -3 c c about 23 feet tall. Kardell was concerned about this being less advantageous or more advantageous in the loss of existing trees. Crone replied that they have saved a few significant trees on the site. There are not that many on the site. There are a few in the middle. Wissner asked if an Office Depot was definite. Tom Palmquist, Ryan Companies, replied that it's a probable alternative to the property.Kardell commented that the issue of screening of the mechanical equipment has come up fairly often in the past. They are very sensitive to that, but if Staff is comfortable with it, she expects that it be consistent within the balance of the projects. Franzen noted that if they approve the mechanical equipment of a certain height that matches the building, he wants that same application on all other building projects. Palmquist asked if he means material or just from the overall color. Franzen replied material and color. Foote commented that the project looks good and he has no problem with it. Regarding the parapet wall, he wondered how they can do this on one and enforce it on the other ones. Franzen replied that the City ordinance requires screening from public roads and adjacent land uses. The actual solution depends upon the project and the circumstances. Wissner indicated that she supports the project. Schlampp supports the project. Kardell supports the project. She indicated that the intent is that Staff will work out the mechanical screening issue with them, and whatever is determined will be consistent on the balance of the commercial property as well. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0-0. MOTION 2: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Ryan Construction Company for Site Plan review on 4.43 acres based on plans dated June 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995, with the addition of the fact that the parapet would be on this building and in all other buildings consistent to each other. Motion carried 6-0-0. V. C. - y � c MOTION 3: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Ryan Construction Company for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 4.43 acres based on plans dated June 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995, with the addition of the fact that the parapet would be on this building and in all other buildings consistent to each other. Motion carried 6- 0-0. MOTION 4: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Ryan Construction Company for Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on 4.43 acres based on plans dated June 12, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 23, 1995, with the addition of the fact that the parapet would be on this building and in all other buildings consistent to each other. Motion carried 6-0-0. V. c . - s C � STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Planner DATE: June 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Hartford Place - Office Depot APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc. LOCATION: Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept Amendment on 4.43 acres. 2. PUD District Review on 4.43 acres. 3. Site Plan Review on 4.43 acres. 1 -a ElIRS l- 111111151 ADO � " �Ra i ItlI • Staff Report Hartford Place - Office Depot June 23, 1995 BACKGROUND In October of 1994, the City Council approved development plans for the Hartford Place project. Hartford Place consists of 7 sites with a mixture of Commercial and Residential uses. The City approved 186,000 sq. ft. of retail for Sites 1 and 2, 58 twinhomes on Site 3, 25 single family homes on Site 4, 160 townhomes on Site 5 and 6, and no plans approved for commercial on Site 7. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST Ryan Companies is proposing a change to commercial Site 1 only. The revised development plan is for an Office Depot. Ryan Companies is asking for approval of this project as an alternate plan while still maintaining an approval for the original three building plan for two restaurants and a small office building. The PUD would allow the City flexibility to approve alternative site plans. The staff is comfortable with either use of the property. SITE PLAN The approved site plan consists of 21,600 sq. ft. of commercial uses in three buildings on three lots. The current request is for one 30,000 sq. ft. building on one lot. The site plan is at a base area ratio of .16. The City code would allow a maximum base area ratio of .20. The parking requirement is based upon a ratio of 5.5 spaces per 1,000 for a total of 165 parking spaces. Parking meets City code requirements. The building meets the required minimum setbacks from all property lines. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The building architecture is consistent with the standards approved as part of the Planned Unit Development. The building is compatible with the commercial buildings on Site 2 to the south. The building meets the exterior material standard requirement of 75% face brick and glass. City code requires all rooftop mechanical equipment to be physically screened from all public roads and adjacent differing land uses. The staff would suggest extending the parapet wall by a dimension of 3 feet to screen the mechanical equipment. An architectural solution would be better than individual metal screens around each of the mechanical units. Parapet walls used for mechanical equipment screening was a requirement of the Planned Unit Development. 2 v.c. - g r c Staff Report Hartford Place - Office Depot June 23, 1995 LANDSCAPING The landscaping requirement is based upon a caliper inch requirement according to building square footage, screening of parking areas, screening of loading areas, and tree replacement. The caliper inch requirement is 187.5 inches. The landscape plan meets this requirement. The elevation of Prairie Center Drive and the proposed parking lot are the same. No berming is proposed within the front yard setback and cars will be visible. The staff would suggest providing a berm of at least three feet in height or a combination of undulating berms of three feet in height and a double row of shrubs along Prairie Center Drive. The setback to parking along Prairie Lakes Drive is not as wide and the berm cannot be constructed as high. A double row of shrubs in this location is necessary. The loading area will be screened by an extension of a wing wall of at least 12 feet in height along the eastern edge of the loading dock. Conifer and shade trees along the east property line will help screen views from the adjacent office building and from the shoreland area. The tree inventory indicates 12 inches of significant trees. The single ash tree must be replaced on an inch per inch basis. This is included on the landscape plan. TRAFFIC Although the building square footage on the property increases by 9,000 sq. ft., traffic will actually decrease because the use of the property changes. The 1994 PUD traffic study showed a total of 2,628 daily trips based upon a plan for two restaurants and a small office building. Since the use of this building is general retail, which has a lower trip generation rate than restaurant, the average daily traffic will be 1,500 trips per day. As part of the approval for the PUD for Hartford Place, a traffic signal was required to be installed by the developer concurrent with the development of the first commercial building constructed on the property. STORM WATER PRETREATMENT The approved pretreatment plan for the Hartford Place project included three NURP ponds. The amount of impervious surface area on this plan is similar to the original plan and the storm water pretreatment ponds do not have to be increased in size. 3 V.C . Staff Report Hartford Place - Office Depot June 23, 1995 SIDEWALK A sidewalk must be constructed along the east side of Prairie Lakes Drive concurrent with the development of this property. SIGNS City code will allow one 80 sq. ft., 20 ft. high pylon sign and one 36 sq. ft., 6 ft. high monument sign. . The proposed signs meet City code requirements. In addition, a PUD monument sign is shown within the City right-of-way. City code will allow one monument sign per street frontage in the development. This monument sign should be relocated to meet the 20' setback from City right-of-way. UTILITIES There is 14 feet of fill proposed over an existing utility line. Either the utility line must be relocated or structural information must be provided which indicates that the pipe can support the amount of fill. This will require approval by the City Engineer. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The Community Development Staff would recommend that the PUD amendment and site plan be approved based on plans dated June 23, 1995 and subject to the recommendations and Staff Report dated June 23, 1995 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Submit a rooftop mechanical screening plan with a 3 ft. high parapet wall. B. Submit a revised landscaping plan with berming and shrubs along street frontages. C. Submit a revised plan which relocates the entrance monument sign, meeting the 20' setback requirement. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 4 v.c. - io Staff Report Hartford Place - Office Depot June 23, 1995 B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. C. Submit plans for review by the Fire Marshal. D. Submit final exterior building elevations and exterior material samples for review. E. Submit final landscape plan and security amount for review. 5 V.C. � � "PIANT W.HWU1t / CON 1 MY 1 MOM WAINAMIX MNIa ROE I am 00 so r 1 Irc)4N 1s I PHimL _ I�.- II I ' ° ) OFFICE 1 I I 1 1 J � Isooe ar. I , 1 ► 1 1 ! ( 1 I, MIANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS • I ' I 1 ' 1 71IM Aa[A 71 la1 _ L lstmo /J70 61!1 r4 P[O OICI[S 11ldIMD I I I I Soo REST. 1 ! - 1 IAIIIYSCW arts latfs C..1 1 Rrcpmto NK URr[D RRwiO[0 to~W 1 i ! a vt•a II I Iej ' 1 .-o• a Iox or a/s._� .w 1 INr AD"/ANDSCN7 aroUR wws oo)D)wtuM cAvtR \ 1 1 WK11)IIIN.S FOR OI•NAW.14 MKES AM 90"MASSsuG I p R I 1 •' 1 1 I r 127 fIOI N CAPE* - o I SDD[D M J Ir nol-S JD I. REST. 2 1 V -rr a9M M0IIIWIIDM.1 - •- / �- O[ftR 10 GRMIA NN t c- IJ SEE/ LANDSCAPE DETAIL SHEET FOR PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 `. 1 N L4 0, so loo• 150• N N FINS 1 Nar Mw.Mwl '.i w . •..r.�n M .".iR RYAN CONSTRUCTION CQIIFANy I M•w.N M.. ':Y •��. •.: rwirul DF IMIESOTA,NC, N>.) NARtFORD PLACE Asww is NIo m»to-Y)) _�alb�L_wt:l. +� i�NEUDIr,AVEw�a ErAM.IgEiN Elrt LANDSCAPE PLAN ENO PRAT .ON 3L Ism /3 • 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge Building 1500 West County Road B2 (OF Roseville,Minnesota 55113 June 20, 1995 Michael Franzen Community Development Department City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Drive Eden Prairie MN 55344-2230 Dear Michael: SUBJECT: Hartford Place - Office Depot Site Plan Review S/95-039 Prairie Center Dr and Prairie Lake Dr Eden Prairie, Hennepin County CS 2744 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has looked over the Hartford Place- Office Depot site plan. This project is not adjacent to Mn/DOT right of way and we do not anticipate serious negative impacts on the state highway system. No formal review of the project is necessary at this time. If you have any questions, please contact me at 582-1386. Sincerely, Ruth Ann Sobnosky Principal Transportation Planner v.C- An Equal Opportunity Employer EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-18-95 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. v. � DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger SUPERVALU EAW Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt a Resolution for Finding of No Significant Impact. Background: The Planning Commission reviewed the EAW and the findings of fact at the July 10, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission voted unanimously for a finding of no significant impact on the SuperValu Corporate Headquarters EAW and that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary. The Planning Commission discussed three main environmental issues, including: • Traffic • Water quality of Bryant Lake • Wetland Impacts The Planning Commission felt that the traffic impacts on Valley View Road would be mitigated by traffic signals and intersection improvements. SuperValu agreed to participate in the cost of these improvements and a travel demand management program. The Planning Commission determined that the water quality of Bryant Lake would be improved because the current parking lot is not pretreated to current standards and would be pretreated to NURP standards as the project develops. No wetland fill is proposed with this project. There is an excavation of an Army Corps regulated wetland which may require mitigation. This will not be determined until a permit is submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers. This would likely occur after the City approves a rezoning and site plan for the property. If the Army Corps determines that mitigation is necessary, then SuperValu would redesign the building and parking plans to accommodate the required mitigation. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Finding of No Significant Impact. 2. Memo dated July 7, 1995 V. D. ' I SUPERVALU EAW CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION FINDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR SUPERVALU CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ADDITION, A PRIVATE ACTION, DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie did hold a hearing on July 18, 1995 to consider SuperValu Corporation proposal of SuperValu Corporate Headquarters Addition; and, WHEREAS, said development is located on approximately 135.4 acres of land located North of Valley View Lane, between Highway 212 and I-494; and, WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the SuperValu Corporate Headquarters Addition development proposal of SuperValu Corporation, Environmental Assessment Worksheet finding of the g the project and did recommend approval of no significant impact; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of Eden Prairie reviewed the Record of Decision for the SuperValu Corporate Headquarters Addition on July 18, 1995; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, that an Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for the SuperValu Corporate Headquarters Addition proposal of SuperValu Corporation, because the project is not a major action, does not have significant environmental effects, and is not of more than local significance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Negative Declaration Notice shall be officially filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council. ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Review of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for SuperValu Corporate Headquarters Expansion BACKGROUND In December of 1994, the City Council approved a PUD Concept Plan for the SuperValu Corporate Headquarters expansion. A condition of approval of the PUD, was for SuperValu to prepare an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and submit for review and action by the City. Approval of the PUD is predicated on the results of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. In accordance with the rules of the State Environmental Quality Board, the City published the availability of the EAW in the Eden Prairie News on March 27, 1995. The comment period was open until May 6, 1995. Copies of the EAW were submitted to the appropriate agencies and also to Dan Grote of the Willow Creek Homeowners Association. The City received comments from several agencies. After the May 6, 1995 closing of the comment period, City staff and SuperValu worked on preparing answers and/or providing additional information to these agencies. Attached to this document is a summary report of the questions raised by outside agencies and responses from SuperValu and the City of Eden Prairie. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET The Environmental issues can be categorized in the following general areas: 1. Traffic impacts on 494 and 169. 2. Water Quality impacts on Bryant Lake. 3. Impacts on wetlands. TRAFFIC IMPACT Traffic impacts are regional and local. The traffic impact on 494 is a .75% increase in the total daily traffic. The traffic impact on Highway 169 is a 2.4% increase. VD. - 3 The Metropolitan Council is asking the City and SuperValu to pay for expansion improvements to 494 and Highway 212 or that the project should not be built. The staff believes that the City and individual developers cannot be held responsible for regional system improvements. The amount of traffic generated by SuperValu is a small percentage increase on the regional roads and is consistent with the traffic projections forwarded to the Metropolitan Council and the State Highway Department for the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for 494. The SuperValu site is being developed less than a .3 base area ratio which means that the actual traffic generated is lower than the EIS numbers. Traffic will increase on Valley View Road. SuperValu's trip generation of the total trips on Valley View Road represent up to 9% of the total traffic. Even without SuperValu's expansion, there are existing and forecasted congestion problems at the ramp termini with 494 and the Highway 212, Valley View Road, Bryant Lake Drive Intersection. A traffic signal at the I-494 west ramp, signal at the SuperValu east-west entrances, are needed and will help with traffic flow along Valley View Road. At the Highway 212 Intersection with Valley View Road, the right turn lane on the east approach is needed, a right-turn lane on the west approach, a double left hand turn to go west on Valley View Road from Highway 212 are needed improvements which will help ease congestion at these intersections. In addition, SuperValu should participate in a travel demand management program which uses, for example, ride sharing, preferred parking, car pools and van pools, etc. The staff would recommend that SuperValu participate in a cost-sharing basis with the City, County and State on the signalization and geometric improvements on Valley View Road and for SuperValu to prepare and follow a travel demand management program. WATER QUALITY IMPACTS ON BRYANT LAKE Affected agencies have expressed concern for the on-going effect of the proposed development and the associated storm water runoff on the water quality of Bryant Lake. The PUD Concept approved by the City provided the required pretreatment ponds as stipulated by City code. However, other agencies felt that a nutrient budget analysis was needed to analyze the increase nutrient loading from the proposed project on Bryant Lake. A nutrient budget analysis and modeling of expected water quality impacts on Bryant Lake was completed by Barr Engineering. This analysis indicates that the phosphorus export from the project site area will decrease at full development with the proposed treatment ponds as shown on the concept plan as compared to the existing condition. This is based on the fact that the current parking lot area currently discharges into the Lake with little or no pretreatment. WETLAND IMPACTS The PUD Concept plan proposed no fill in a wetland area. An excavation of a regulated army corps wetland for the construction of a pretreatment pond is proposed. The Minnesota Pollution V, D . - y Control Agency commented that the storm water retention should be considered as impact and be offset by wetland mitigation areas. The Army Corps of Engineers is the permitting agency for the construction of the NURP pond within their jurisdictional wetland boundary. If the Army Corps of Engineers does not allow this construction, then SuperValu will have to find another location on site to build the pond. Steep slopes, tree cover, building and parking area leaves little room for construction of additional ponding. It may be possible to enlarge the north and south NURP ponds. If the City desires no further increase in tree loss, then SuperValu would have to revise the parking and building plans to accommodate the pretreatment pond areas. CONCLUSION The traffic study recommends signalization and geometric improvements on Valley View Road for which SuperValu has agreed to participate in a portion of the costs with the City, State and County. These improvements should be constructed as each phase is built. This will help ease traffic congestion on Valley View Road. All water leaving hard surface areas on this site will be pretreated to NURP standards as required by City code. Water quality leaving this site will be better in the after condition since water from the existing parking lot is currently not pretreated. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the information contained in the EAW, the comments received on the EAW, the initial analysis completed and response to comments received, the Planning Commission should conclude the following: 1. The project does not have the potential for significant environmental affects. 2. The preparation of Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on this project is not required or recommended. DATE: 07/18/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: V.E SECTION: Public Hearing DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division VACATION 95-05: Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements over parts David Olson of Windfield 3rd and 5th Additions (Published 07/06/95 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt the Resolution vacating the Drainage and Utility easements on Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Windfield 5th Addition and Lot 11, Block 2, Windfield 3rd Addition Overview: The Developer of Windfield Addition has requested this vacation to enable the adjustment of lot lines and replatting through Windfield 7th Addition. Supporting Information: Vacation Drawings CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER PARTS OF WINDFIELD 3RD AND 5TH ADDITIONS (VAC 95-05) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described therein as follows: All drainage and utility easements on Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Windfield 5th Addition and Lot 11, Block 2, Windfield 3rd Addition according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 18, 1995 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 18, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION i '1 0 0 0 5 M h0 0 Z � 12 i 7 o i V Iv � 8 � � o 3 9 z I � 3 SCALE 1 INCH = 60 FEET SHADED AREA DENOTES DRAINAGE & & UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED. Y• �. 3 Fz»a�_ FjA; o F IL c� \ J / 10 010 � rn ' / 40 1 BLOCK ' 1 ,1 4'd ell tAJ w � �811•E \ /10 h Y�` y DATE: 07/18/95 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: V.F SECTION: Public Hearing DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division VACATION 95-06: Vacation of Right-of-Way for part of Valley Oak Drive David Olson (published 07/06/95) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt the Resolution vacating Right-of-Way for Valley Oak Drive over Tracts G and H, Registered Land Survey 601 Overview: The final plat of Riverview Heights 2nd Addition involves the replatting of the referenced Tracts. The City Attorney has recommended vacation of the right-of-way prior to an ownership transfer of the Tracts. Supporting Information: Vacation Drawings CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PART OF VALLEY OAK DRIVE (VAC 95-06) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain right-of-way described therein as follows: Tracts G and H, Registered Land Survey 601 recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, also known as Valley Oak Drive, located in Section 35, Township 116, Range 22W WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 18, 1995 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said right-of-way as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 18, 1995. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk R.T. DOC. N0. \ / RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS r 1 1-4)W •. �ry 2ND ADDITION Jy Po'E p.a�'Y. -3i.r•io•!}. Tr +ss•.y k T I r � `. r I :! lk 24 ,M'hYDVf,e.W ��',�(IS[.'X,l)r4r)J.n. rP'1srl/4•' SENfNJ P o� \- 3 z 1 e� ♦� ��\� ,<J'4J J = � ter)•_ .I 60 0 60 PO ISO i 3 �*1 ' N SCALE IN FEET sDs sJ 3a.f I). \\e. 5 h`CI+',y-C Jm nn a1 1 - G $� a b 5 !I •Denotes Iron ■onueent. OUTLOT A L '... .:' '1 ..ram Bear lope erC Oriented to the plat of s •`'� 6`^ / 'r \_,'; a \(� �/ D [.s b R I VERY I EM HE I GHT S. _. a ._. - W s, Ic D)e1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS v� `p.'_..._...... t''Jt$ e/i'.yt i�siri)". 'r'°!�ii�ie• ARE SHOWN THUS: / t S (Ir 1- - ,,. N i `I 1 �I i' ^I� Belnq 5 feet In wltltn en0 atll flown a - ys'' F lot Insa. pnless othorwlse shown an f0 toot In Wltlth and atllo Inlnp rlght oT wayy Ilnsf unless oMerwlse shown on this plat. 1y _ _ _ ��-x- - _ pJL - - LJL _ - J p •,,(pNa 53eI14. un IAIry Ie AY 5N1 75 4,3 i _ J33 17 NS YD1 SS/.J9 qS e01 liTyvr�Y nrr Nrr �rT :�t�)if f;l ii%I C.ii i i_U i ) Plenn7a0 Enpinoorin/ surveying .v[_ 1-4, ItI i_.I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS DATE: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 18, 1995 SECTION: DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. FINANCE DEPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI CHECKS NUMBER 32451 THRU 32870 Action/Direction: JULY 18, 1995 VI 32451 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER FIRST HALF 1995 PROPERTY TAX-RICE MARSH 2968.10 PARK/RILEY LAKE PARK. 32452 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT EXPENSES-POLICE DEPT. 63.77 32453 JASON-NORTHCO L P #1 JULY 95 RENT-LIQUOR STORE I. 5197.00 32454 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTER INC JULY 95 RENT-LIQUOR STORE II. 5029.50 32455 UNITED PROPERTIES JULY 95 RENT-LIQUOR STORE III. 6554.25 32456 RAE GAIDA REFUND-OLD LOG THEATRE TRIP-ADULT 26.00 PROGRAMS. 32457 ANIL GOWDA REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 18.00 32458 JOHN JACOBSEN REFUND-CIRCUS PIZZA & HORSEBACK RIDING 27.00 TRIP-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM. 32459 RICHARD JENSEN REFUND-JR TEAM TENNIS LEAGUE. 39.00 32460 DEBRA JOHNSON REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. 52.00 32461 JOYCE KRANTZ REFUND-CIRCUS PIZZA & HORSEBACK RIDING- 27.00 SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM. 32462 ANETTE MCCULLOUGH REFUND-INTO TO JAZZ LESSONS. 21.00 32463 PATTY MCFADDEN REFUND-TENNIS LESSONS. 30.00 32464 ERIC SIT REFUND-STANDARD FIRST AID MANUAL. 9.00 32465 JOAN STOLE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 7.66 32466 CAROL STUBBINGS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 32467 JANET TARAGOS REFUND-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM. 30.00 32468 BARB TARRAS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00 32469 JODELL THORSETT REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00 32470 LAURENS VAN DER VELDE REFUND-TEAM TENNIS TRAINING. 33.00 32471 NANCY VOTAVA REFUND-STANDARD FIRST AID MANUAL. 9.00 32472 SUSAN WOLFE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 48.00 32473 KARIN ZELLEY REFUND-CPR LESSONS. 9.60 32474 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS JULY 95 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT. 2126.10 32475 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 48.10 32476 CRAIG JERDE SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 105.00 32477 LISA MASCARENAS SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 170.00 32478 LUANN MASCARENAS SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 102.00 32479 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERA SERVICE. 432.39 32480 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSES-CITY HALL. 157.99 32481 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-STREET MAINTENANCE/FLEET 120.00 SERVICES. 32482 BARBARA BEHLKE REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 21.00 PROGRAM. 32483 SANDRA DUFFY REFUND-EXPLORE MINNESOTA-OUTDOOR CENTER 75.00 PROGRAM. 32484 KEITH ERICKSON REFUND-TWINS DAY-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAM 6.00 FOR DANNY. 32485 JEANNE FIMMEN REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 21 .00 PROGRAM. 32486 KATHY GAUER REFUND-GOLF LESSONS. 32.00 32487 TIM GLUSZAK REFUND-MENS TENNIS LEAGUE FEE. 22.00 32488 JANE GUERTIN REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 6.00 PROGRAM. 32489 BARB HAMMERSCHMIDT REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 21.00 PROGRAM. 2373046 JULY 18, 1995 1 . JULY 18, 1995 VI 32490 KRISTIN HEALEY REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 21 .00 PROGRAM. 32491 MARY HEY REFUND-IN-LINE SKATING LESSONS. 30.00 32492 SAMUEL HINES REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 21 .00 PROGRAM. 32493 CLAIRE JOING REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 20.00 PROGRAM. 32494 JENNIFER LAMPLOT REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 25.00 PROGRAM. 32495 JUDY MCCORKELL REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 12.00 PROGRAM. 32496 SUZANNE MEYERS REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 42.00 PROGRAM. 32497 HOLLY OLEARY REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM. 36.00 32498 LAURA SCHULTE REFUND-IN-LINE SKATING LESSONS. 30.00 32499 R USHER REFUND-TWINS DAY-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS 21.00 PROGRAM. 32500 VALERIE WALSH REFUND-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM. 45.00 32501 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE PAYROLL 06-23-95. 49.37 32502 CARVER COUNTY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SV PAYROLL 06-23-95. 276.93 32503 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 06-23-95 SAVINGS BONDS. 400.00 32504 GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 06-23-95. 8871.50 32505 HEALTHPARTNERS JULY 95 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM. 27786.13 32506 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 06-23-95. 240.46 32507 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 06-23-95. 275.08 32508 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 06-23-95., 3669.26 32509 MEDICA CHOICE JULY 95 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM. 50107.23 32510 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 06-23-95. 185.73 32511 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 06-23-95. 227.42 32512 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PAYROLL 06-23-95. 1251.50 32513 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 06-23-95. 247.00 32514 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 06-23-95. 25.00 32515 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 06-23-95. 41698.28 32516 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 06-23-95. 110.00 32517 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 06-23-95. 157.75 32518 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM/ 45.40 SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM. 32519 PETTY CASH CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-ROUND LAKE 363.49 CONCESSIONS. 32520 COMPUTER RENAISSANCE IDENTITY SERIAL MOUSE-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS 30.89 PROGRAM. 32521 SKILLPATH SEMINARS CONFERENCE-FINANCE DEPT. 149.00 32522 NANCY DIERAUER REFUND-GOLF LESSONS. 32.00 32523 JIM WEBER REFUND-SOCCER CAMP. 76.00 32524 MIKAEL RUDOLPH ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES- 500.00 ARTS COMMISSION. 32525 CARD SERVICES CONFERENCE-ADMINISTRATION DEPT. 334.34 32526 DELEGARD TOOL CO SCREWDRIVER SETS/AIR TANK/VISE/VARIABLE 276.79 SPEED DRILL FOR SIGNS-FLEET SERVICES/ STREET DEPT. 13768955 JULY 18, 1995 2. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32527 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER HAND DEGREASER/TOOL BOXES/PIPE/DETERGENT/ 1104.27 WATERING WAND/LOCKS/KEY/SHOWER SPRAYIVENT COVERS/CLAMPS/PAILSIPLUGS/WRENCH SETS/ SCREWDRIVERSIBATTERIES/UTILITY KNIVES/ SHOE LACES/CABLE/TRASH BAGS/FUSE PULLERS/ BRUSHES/COUPLERS/HOSE MENDERSIEYE BOLTS/ NOZZLES/SAW/PLIERS/WASHERS/WEED WACKERI TIRE REPAIRS/VALVES/TACKLE BOXIFLASHLIGHT/ NUTS & BOLTS-FIRE DEPT/FLEET SERVICES/ PARK MAINTENANCE/FACILITIES DEPT/ UTILITIES DIVISION. 32528 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE SPRAY PAINT/PRIMER/WIRE ROPE CLIPS/ 424.54 FITTINGS/PIPE/ADAPTERS/WAND HOSE ENDS/ FASTENERS/HAND TOOLSILINK CONNECTOR/RADIO CASSETTE/MOTOR OIL/BATTERIESIHINGES/ MATCHESIBRUSH/GOGGLES/PADLOCK/PAINT ROLLERS/PAINT BRUSHES/LEVEL/HAMMER/PLUGS/ TRAY LINERS/TAPE/MARKERS-PARK MAINTENANCE/ COMMUNITY CENTER. 32529 MINNEGASCO SERVICE. 4524.40 32530 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY SERVICE. 42424.27 32531 BEAVER MOUNTAIN WATER PARK TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 240.00 FEES PAID. 32532 CIRCUS PIZZA TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 158. 15 FEES PAID. 32533 GREG RUSH ENTERTAINMENT-SAFETY CAMP. 200.00 32534 VERTICAL ENDEAVORS TICKETS-TEEN WORK PROGRAM/FEES PAID. 232.00 32535 JEAN ANGELIS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 30.00 32536 NANCY CAUDILL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00 32537 LISA COOK REFUND-GOLF LESSONS. 32.00 32538 DESTINY DUBE REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING. 80.00 32539 CASEY HOOKE REFUND-RACQUETBALL LESSONS. 18.00 32540 JACKI KNUDSON REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING. 80.00 32541 JANE MARS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00 32542 LAURIE NOREN REFUND-PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROGRAM. 36.00 32543 TAMMY OROURKE REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21 .00 32544 RENEE RAHIMI REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. 12.00 32545 ROBERT SIMPSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 32546 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LTD PARTNERSHIP FIRST HALF 1995 TAX SETTLEMENT. 45563.75 32547 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 FIRST HALF 1995 TAX INCREMENT TO SCHOOL 4558.98 DISTRICT ON THE PRAIRIE VILLAGE APARTMENTS PROJECT. 32548 SLIM MANAGEMENT SERVICE FIRST HALF 1995 TAX INCREMENT FUNDS 27234.47 DISTRICT #1759. 32549 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER JUNE 95 SELF-HAULER SOLID WASTE MGMT FEE- 207.91 PARK MAINTENANCE. 32550 AMERICANA FIREWORKS DISPLAY CO FIREWORKS DISPLAY-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION. 10000.00 32551 MINNESOTA DANCE ALLIANCE ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES- 700.00 ARTS COMMISSION. 32552 TWIN CITIES BUDDHIST ASSN ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES- 500.00 ARTS COMMISSION. 13844774 JULY 18, 1995 3. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32553 MEDALIST CONCERT BAND ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES- 500.00 ARTS COMMISSION JULY 16 1995. 32554 WAYZATA WOMENS CHOIR ENTERTAINMENT-STARING LK CONCERT SERIES- 150.00 ARTS COMMISSION. 32555 VALLEYFAIR TICKETS-REIMBURSED BY CITY EMPLOYEES. 373.50 32556 BELLBOY CORPORATION BEER. 36.00 32557 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 16765.32 32558 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER. 42229.45 32559 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 15203.75 32560 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX. 1393.30 32561 PAUSTIS & SONS CO MIX. 27.95 32562 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY MIX. 564.20 32563 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO BEER. 59.85 32564 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER: 33749.30 32565 MN DEPT OF REVENUE MAY 95 SALES TAX. 1791 .10 32566 FEIST BLANCHARD CO DISC PADS/BRAKE PADS/FLASHERS-FLEET 167.05 SERVICES. 32567 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY BATTERIES/ADAPTOR/FUNNELS/FILTERS/GLOVES/ 2586.69 PAINT/SEALS/V-BELTS/PCV VALVES/FLASHERS/ COUPLERS/HEADLAMPS/ROTORS/SPARK PLUGS/U- BOLTS/SWITCHES/BULBS/BEARINGS/SANDPAPER/ ADHESIVE/DUCT TAPE/FUSE HOLDERS/HOSE CLAMPS/BATTERY CHARGER/HOSE/OXYGEN SENSOR/ TAIL LIGHT/GREASE/GREASE GUN-FLEET SERVICES/PARK MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT. 32568 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. 2550.95 32569 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A PAYROLL 07-07-95. 95123.53 32570 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT UNI PAYROLL 07-07-95. 900.00 32571 CARL ANDERSON JR REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEE. 94. 16 32572 DEB ATKINS REFUND-CLAM RIVER CANOE TRIP-OUTDOOR 20.00 CENTER PROGRAM. 32573 COLLEEN BERMAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 32574 LYNNE BUAKE REFUND-SKATING LESSONS. 29.00 32575 NANCY CAUDILL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 32576 JONELL CELLA REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 32577 LINDA CROSBY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 15.00 32578 TODD JACKSON REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEE. 73.25 32579 BELSY KNOX REFUND-BLACK ASH BASKET CLASS-OUTDOOR 6.00 CENTER PROGRAM. 32580 JANE LOTZER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 48.00 32581 KULWANT SINGH MODI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 42.00 32582 PUJA NAKRONI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 3.00 32583 MAUREEN PETERSON REFUND-LIFEGUARD TRAINING. 80.00 32584 KATHRYN SCHULTZ REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 48.00 32585 MARY WEEKS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00 32586 STEPHANIE AGNEW SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 35.40 32587 PAUL ANDERSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 3.90 32588 KATIE AHMANN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 12.00 32589 ALISHA BEYER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 15.60 32590 CHAD CARLSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 25.20 21481845 JULY 18, 1995 4. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32591 CHARLES CHERRY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 22.50 32592 DAREN CODY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 27.00 32593 KATIE CONNERS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 21.60 32594 MARIE DISONA SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 51 .00 32595 CHRISTINA ERIKSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 3.90 32596 T J ESSENSEN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 30.60 32597 DUSTIN GAYNOR SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 29.25 32598 MELISSA HAGGENMILLER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 16.90 32599 COLIN HARER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 30.60 32600 AMY HOBLIT SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 27.95 32601 KIRSTEN JOHNSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 24.60 32602 KATIE KELLEY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 57.20 32603 KRISTIN KELLY SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 27.00 32604 ERICA KUCHERA SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 11 .40 32605 JENNEY LAVIGNE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 36.00 32606 DAN LENNON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 30.60 32607 SEAN LENNON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 28.80 32608 CHRIS LEPAGE SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 3.60 32609 JAKE LINDHOLM SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 10.80 32610 ANGIE MACDONALD SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 29.40 32611 KENDRA MARTENSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 28.80 32612 SARAH MCCANN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 16.80 32613 STEVE MEENDERING SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 20. 10 32614 HEATHER MILLER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 32.40 32615 PHIL MITCHELL SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 28.80 32616 BEN NEUMANN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 16.80 32617 SARAH RING SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 29.25 32618 LAURA ROFSHUS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 12.60 32619 MICHAEL SEVERSON SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 27.95 32620 BJORN SVENDSEN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 23.40 32621 BJORN SVENDSEN SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 23.40 32622 JOHN TAGGATZ SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 19.50 32623 JOHN TRUER SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 30.60 32624 COREY YEAROUS SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 19.50 32625 BROWN & CRIS INC SERVICE-MITCHELL ROAD/TECHNOLOGY DRIVE. 160106.80 32626 CBI NA-CON INC SERVICE-ELEVATED WATER TANK. 58775.93 32627 HARDRIVES INC SERVICE-ANDERSON LKS PKWY & PRESERVE BLVD. 34653.63 32628 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP SERVICE-CITY WEST PKWY EXTENSION. 196602.30 32629 NODLAND CONSTRUCTION CO SERVICE-KIMBERLY LN SANITARY SEWER 36350.80 RECONSTRUCTION. 32630 VALLEY PAVING INC SERVICE-DELL ROAD. 19566. 12 32631 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER PRESSURE WASHER RENTAL-CITY HALL. 90.00 32632 A U S COMMUNICATIONS INC POOL PHONE INSTALLATION-COMMUNITY CENTER. 54.00 32633 ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICE-FINANCE DEPT. 1141 .00 32634 AIM ELECTRONICS INC POOL EXHAUST SYSTEM REPAIR-COMMUNITY 107.40 CENTER. 32635 ALL AMERICAN REC REFUND-BUILDING PERMIT FEE. 65.00 32636 MARK ALEWINE SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 304.00 32637 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE IN TACKBOARD/PENCIL DRAWER/PEDESTAL/FLIPPER 438.78 DOOR UNIT-ADMINISTRATION DEPT. 50910636 JULY 18, 1995 5. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32638 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO MATS/TOWELS-LIQUOR STORES. 152.95 32639 AMERICAN RED CROSS TEXTBOOKS/MANUALS/LIFEGUARD TRAINING-POOL 659. 12 LESSONS. 32640 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING BROCHURES-POOL SPECIAL EVENTS. 89.46 32641 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS/DELINEATOR CIRCLES/ 382.31 BATTERIES-STREET DEPT. 32642 KEN ANDERSEN TRUCKING SERVICE-DISPOSAL OF WILDLIFE-ANIMAL 229.00 CONTROL DEPT. 32643 AQUA CITY PLUMBING & HEATING TESTING OF BACK FLOW PREVENTERS-PARK 505.00 MAINTENANCE. 32644 AQUA ENGINEERING INC FITTINGS-PARK MAINTENANCE. 13.42 32645 APOLLO ELEVATOR COMPANY TRACED WIRES & CONNECTED PHONE WIRES- 132.60 COMMUNITY CENTER. 32646 ARMOR SECURITY INC INSTALLED LOCK/KEYS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 493.89 32647 AVR INC CEMENT-STREET MAINTENANCE. 477.01 32648 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY SERVICE-SUNNYBROOK RD WETLAND DELINEATION. 380.70 32649 BAUER BUILT INC BATTERIES-FLEET SERVICES. 644.72 32650 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC ACRYLIC SHEETS/PAPER LINE KIT-COMMUNITY 301 .04 CENTER. 32651 BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 1067.55 32652 BETH BEUTELL SERVICE-GUYS & DOLLS PRODUCTION-ARTS 100.00 COMMISSION. 32653 DAVID BLACK MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADMINISTRATION. 10.64 32654 LEE M BRANDT SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 140.00 32655 BROADWAY AWARDS TROPHIES-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM/POOL 234.72 LESSONS. 32656 BRW INC SERVICE-DELL ROAD CONSTRUCTION. 564.18 32657 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE. 153.76 32658 BUMPER TO BUMPER DISC PAD SET-FLEET SERVICES. 33.97 32659 BURNSVILLE HEATING REFUND-OVERPAYMENT MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE. 30.00 32660 BRC-ELECTIONS VOTE TABULATORS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT- 4410.00 ELECTIONS DEPT. 32661 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS NOISE FILTER/ANTENNA MOUNT REPLACED- 48.39 POLICE DEPT. 32662 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO KNIFE PKG/PINS/LINKS-FLEET SERVICES. 402.37 32663 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC MODEM-ENGINEERING DEPT. 234.30 32664 CENTRAIRE INC REPLACED FAN MOTORS-SENIOR CENTER/ 301.00 REPLACED EVAPORATOR MOTOR-LIQUOR STORE I. 32665 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS SPINNER-PARK MAINTENANCE. 14.70 32666 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICE-MATERIAL TESTING & INSPECTION- 2651.38 DELL ROAD CONSTRUCTION. 32667 COMPLETE BEVERAGE SERVICE EXPENSES-CHAPLAINS APPRECIATION DINNER- 83.81 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 32668 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC CEMENT CURE/FINISHING BROOM/FIBERGLASS 128.52 TAPE-STREET MAINTENANCE. 32669 COPIES NOW LAMINATE-STREET MAINTENANCE. 3.38 32670 COPY EQUIPMENT INC LEVEL RODS/NAILS-ENGINEERING DEPT. 107.83 32671 CLIFF CRACAUER MILEAGE-FLEET SERVICES. 175.28 32672 CREATIVE CRAFTS INTL CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 350.63 PROGRAM. 1570763 JULY 18, 1995 6. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32673 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO HELMET-FIRE DEPT. 115.00 32674 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SVCS INC TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY-FLEET SERVICES. 37.08 32675 DEM CON LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL-PARK MAINTENANCE. 403.00 32676 DESIGN BY NORVELL INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 62.57 32677 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-POLICE DEFT/AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 391.94 PROGRAM/SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM/TEEN WORK PROGRAM/KIDS KORNER PROGRAM/ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION/ WATER DEFT/EXPENSES-POLICE DEFT/AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM/SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM/TEEN WORK PROGRAM/KIDS KORNER PROGRAM/ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION/WATER DEPT. 32678 DRISKILLS NEWMARKET EXPENSES-FIRE DEPT. 81 .40 32679 THE DROZOAL COMPANY SERVICE-WORKSHOP SESSION-CITY COUNCIL/ 1000.00 CITY STAFF. 32680 JANET DUBOIS SERVICE-CAMP NATCH DIRECTOR-OUTDOOR 800.00 CENTER PROGRAM. 32681 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY MAY 95 COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-CITY 381.09 HALL. 32682 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIV JUNE 95 PEST CONTROL SERVICE-FACILITIES 186.32 DEPT. 32683 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD CARBURETOR REPLACED/WHEEL ALIGNMENT/ 2143.73 OVERHAUL GEAR/SHAFT ASSEMBLY/SEAL KIT/ MIRROR ASSEMBLIES/BRAKE PADS/HEADLIGHT SWITCH/GASKET/SENSOR ASSEMBLY/SOCKET ASSEMBLY/TRANSMISSION FILTERS/VALVE ASSEMBLIES/TUBE ASSEMBLIES/DOOR GASKET/ COOLER ASSEMBLY/BOLTS-FLEET SERVICES. 32684 E P GIRLS INTL SOCCER COMPLIMENTARY CONCESSION COUPONS-4TH OF 60.00 JULY CELEBRATION. 32685 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY COMPLIMENTARY CONCESSION COUPONS-4TH OF 114.50 JULY CELEBRATION. 32686 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 ROOM RENTAL-ADULT PROGRAMS/ART & MUSIC 398.85 PROGRAMS/BUS SERVICE-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM. 32687 E P UNITED METHODIST CHURCH COMPLIMENTARY CONCESSION COUPONS-4TH OF 69.00 JULY CELEBRATION. 32688 EDINA S W PLUMBING FAUCET MOUNT & INSTALLATION-FIRE STATION/ 310.00 COMPRESSOR COOLING LINE REPAIR-PUBLIC WORKS BLDG. 32689 SANDRA EHRICH DECORATIONS-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION/ 98. 14 MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM. 32690 JEFF ELWELL MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER MAINTENANCE. 35.00 32691 CLARK ERICKSON SERVICE-BASKETWEAVING INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR 50.00 CENTER PROGRAM. 32692 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-CITY HALL. 46.91 32693 FERRELLGAS PROPANE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 120.63 690516 JULY 18, 1995 7. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32694 FIBROCOM SERVICE-911 CONNECTION BETWEEN CITY HALL 398.99 & TRANSMITTER SITE-POLICE DEPT. 32695 FIRST FLORAL HALLMARK EXPENSES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 53.25 32696 FISHER ENTERPRISE BLACK DIRT-RILEY LK PARK IMPROVEMENTS. 149.10 32697 FLAGHOUSE INC CRAFT SUPPLIES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 532.80 PROGRAM. 32698 FLOYD SECURITY 3RD QTR 95 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 152.30 AGREEMENT-LIQUOR STORE III. 32699 LYNDELL FREY MILEAGE-YOUTH RECREATION PROGRAM 299.27 SUPERVISOR/EXPENSES-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM/BUS SERVICE-AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PROGRAM. 32700 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS/MATS/TOWELS/MOPS & MOP HEADS- 1155. 14 STREET MAINTENANCE/FLEET SERVICES/PARK MAINTENANCE/UTILITIES DIVISION. 32701 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORMS-FACILITIES DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER/ 2438.31 PARK MAINTENANCE. 32702 GARDEN DESIGN SUBSCRIPTION-PARK PLANNING DEPT. 39.95 32703 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC OIL SWEEP LINE REPAIR/INSTALLED FREON 1756.89 LEAK DETECTOR FOR COMPRESSOR ROOM- COMMUNITY CENTER. 32704 GETTMAN COMPANY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE I. 90.80 32705 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD SPRING WATER-LIQUOR STORE II. 7. 19 32706 GONYEA LAND COMPANY REFUND-PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEE. 10.00 32707 W W GRAINGER INC VOLT TESTER/TIME DELAY FUSES/COMMERCIAL 395.23 MOTOR/FUSES/BATTERIES/GLOVES-COMMUNITY CENTER/STREET DEFT/FLEET SERVICES. 32708 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC INSTALLED FIELD LIGHT TIMERS/INSTALLED 567.47 ELECTRIC CABINET WORK LIGHT/INSTALLED DUPLEX OUTLETS-ROUND LAKE PARK SOFTBALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS/FUSE HOLDER-COMMUNITY CENTER. 32709 GW INTERNATIONAL INSECT REPELLANT SPRAY-ORGANIZED 64.92 ATHLETICS PROGRAM. 32710 HARMON GLASS COMPANY WINDSHIELD & INSTALLATION-FLEET SERVICES. 424.17 32711 GAYLE D HELGESON SERVICE-INTERNSHIP FOR ADAPTIVE 200.00 RECREATION PROGRAM. 32712 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF MAY 95 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT. 897.52 32713 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY OWNERS MAILING LABELS-COMMUNITY 418.75 DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 32714 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER MAY 95 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING SETTLEMENT. 7163.38 32715 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER RECOVERED HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN 849.84 FUNDS. 32716 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER MAY 95 BOARD OF PRISONERS-POLICE DEPT. 1870.84 32717 D C HEY COMPANY INC COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT. 47.25 32718 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MFG FIELD MARKING PAINT-PARK MAINTENANCE. 777.46 32719 HODGES BADGE COMPANY INC AWARD BADGES-POOL LESSONS. 175.85 32720 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC PRINTING-JULY/AUGUST COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER- 4358.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT. 32721 HRFOCUS SUBSCRIPTION-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 127.50 2542217 JULY 18, 1995 8. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32722 HUEBSCH LINE & UNIFORM RENTAL MATS-CITY HALL. 161.02 32723 INACOM CORPORATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT. 323.07 32724 INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE CONFERENCE-CITY STAFF. 1500.00 32725 J & A HANDY-CRAFTS INC TOYS & GAMES-AFTERNOON ADVENTURE PROGRAM. 294.99 32726 CHRIS JESSEN SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 218.75 32727 REBECCA JOHNSON MILEAGE-FINANCE DEPT. 41 . 16 32728 JUSTUS LUMBER CO SILICONE/DECK FLASH/PAINT BRUSHES/VENEER/ 163.24 OAK LUMBER-WATER DEPT. 32729 AMELIA KACHER SERVICE-CAMP NATCH INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR 80.00 CENTER PROGRAM. 32730 PAULINE KACHER SERVICE-CHOREOGRAPHER FOR GUYS & DOLLS 450.00 PRODUCTION-ARTS COMMISSION. 32731 KENNETH COMPANIES INC MAY/JUNE MOWING SERVICE-PLEASANT HILLS 600.00 CEMENTERY. 32732 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC RADIO REPAIR-POLICE DEPT. 263.03 32733 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 2094.94 32734 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES INC ALTERNATOR/REGULATOR-FLEET SERVICES. 354.42 32735 CYNTHIA J LANENBERG MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT. 88.62 32736 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD APRIL 95 LEGAL SERVICE. 8848.05 32737 LANGFORD TOOL & DRILL HEAD PINS-ENGINEERING DEPT. 101 .89 32738 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL CO FLUORESCENT LAMP SLEEVE-CITY HALL. 9.46 32739 C E LASALLE & ASSOCIATES APPRAISAL SERVICES-RUUD PROPERTY. 200.00 32740 FRANK LAVALLE SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 319.50 32741 L M C I T FIRST QTR 95 WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 54203.50 32742 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES SUBSCRIPTION-PARK MAINTENANCE. 18.00 32743 LOGIS JUNE 95 SERVICE. 11575.55 32744 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC BALL VALVES/FUEL SHUT OFF SOLENOID-FLEET 285.23 SERVICES. 32745 ROD MACRAE SUPPLIES-OUTDOOR CENTER PROGRAMS. 85.63 32746 J MARCEL ENTERPRISES UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT. 123.45 32747 MARINE RESCUE PRODUCTS INC MEGAPHONES-POOL SPECIAL EVENTS PROGRAM. 340.95 32748 MARTIN-MCALLISTER EVALUATION SERVICE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 306.00 32749 MASYS CORPORATION AUGUST COMPUTER HARDWARE & SOFTWARE 1429.70 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT. 32750 CAROLE MCMONIGAL SERVICE-PIANIST-AFTER 5 GRANT. 100.00 32751 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS MANTORVILLE TOUR-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID. 260.00 32752 ELLEN MEIER SERVICE-MUSIC DIRECTOR FOR GUYS & DOLLS 400.00 PRODUCTION-ARTS COMMISSION. 32753 MENARDS PLYWOOD/MIRROR/CARPENTERS APRON/PIPE/ 281.70 ELBOWS/COUPLERS/END CAPS/PLASTIC OWL/ LINES/TABLE UMBRELLA/ROPE/TARPS-COMMUNITY CENTER/UTILITIES DIVISION/STREET MAINTENANCE/FACILITIES DEPT. 32754 METRO EROSION INC SILT FENCE INSTALLATION-CITY WEST PARKWAY 700.00 IMPROVEMENTS. 32755 METRO SALES INC COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS/INK/FAX 2182. 11 PAPER-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT. 32756 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REIMBURSEMENT OF RALF LOAN FOR RAY N 1609905.75 WELTER PROPERTY. 32757 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER S JUNE 95 SAC CHARGES. 65637.00 176394671 JULY 18, 1995 9. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32758 MIDAS BRAKE & MUFFLER EXHAUST PIPES/MUFFLER/TAIL PIPES/EXHAUST 194. 16 HARDWARE/HANGERS/CLAMPS-FLEET SERVICES. 32759 MIDWEST AQUA CARE WEED CUTTING-ROUND LAKE/STARING LAKE. 1500.00 32760 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP GRAVEL/PATCHING ASPHALT-STREET 8774.49 MAINTENANCE/STORM DRAINAGE PROGRAM. 32761 MIDWEST BANK NOTE COMPANY GENERAL OBLIGATION BUILDING & IMPROVEMENT 980.00 REFUNDING BONDS. 32762 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT. 2111.77 32763 MIDWEST MACHINERY INC ENGINE PARTS/BUSHINGS/SEALS/BEARINGS/OIL 799.95 FILTER/GASKET KIT/THERMOSTAT/SCREWS10- RINGS-FLEET SERVICES. 32764 MPLS AREA ASSN OF REALTORS PUBLICATIONS-ASSESSING DEPT. 151 .23 32765 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS PRINTING INVOICES-ENGINEERING DEPT/ 767.35 BUSINESS CARDS-CITY HALL. 32766 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY FIRE EXTINQUISHER RECHARGING/0-RINGS/ 465.80 BRASS VALVES/WALL BRACKET-FIRE DEPT. 32767 MN FOUNDATION FOR BETTER INTERPRETER SERVICES-LIFEGUARD TRAINING. 222.00 32768 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE INC SHRUBS-PARK MAINTENANCE. 438.78 32769 MOODYS INVESTMENT SERVICE INVESTMENT SERVICE-FINANCE DEPT. 5000.00 32770 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO TUBE/RING-FLEET SERVICES. 48.45 32771 WM MUELLER & SONS INC GRAVEL-STREET MAINTENANCE. 191 .04 32772 MUNICILITE CO CONNECTORS-FLEET SERVICES. 14.31 32773 ANN MYHRE SERVICE-CAMP NATCH INSTRUCTOR-OUTDOOR 120.00 CENTER PROGRAM. 32774 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSN DUES-PARK & RECREATION DEPT. 430.00 32775 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 493.83 32776 NEENAH FOUNDRY CO FRAME/GRATES/GRATE STOP-ENGINEERING DEPT. 166.72 32777 G NEIL COMPANIES COPIER PAPER-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION. 243.02 32778 CHRIS NELMS SERVICE-IN-LINE SKATING INSTRUCTOR/FEES 348.00 PAID. 32779 NETWORK BUSINESS SUPPLIES INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE I. 65.94 32780 BETH NILSSON SERVICE-SKATING DIRECTOR/FEES PAID. 1830.53 32781 NORTH COUNTRY PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 85.20 32782 NORTH STAR ICE SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 2275.20 32783 NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES MAINTENANCE FEE-FINANCE DEPT. 11 .25 32784 OCHS BRICK & TILE CO CLAY-PARK MAINTENANCE. 95.85 32785 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMPUTER REPAIR-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 225.00 32786 HARRY ORTLOFF SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 280.00 32787 OWENS SERVICES CORPORATION TEST KIT/TESTER PEN-COMMUNITY CENTER. 130.92 32788 PARAGON CABLE MPLS CABLE SERVICE-CITY HALL. 33.44 32789 PARAGON CABLE CABLE INSTALLATION AT CITY CENTER/POLICE 3079.44 STATION. 32790 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER HEPATITIS B VACCINE-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 180.20 32791 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-SKATING RINKS. 152.25 32792 DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING INC SERVICE-STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT FOR 6380.00 WELTERS PURGATORY CK. 32793 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC DRIVERS TRAINING SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT. 975.00 32794 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INC POSITION PROFILE REVISED-HUMAN RESOURCES 75.00 DEPT. 32795 CONNIE L PETERS MILEAGE-COMMUNITY CENTER ADMINISTRATION. 16.80 3935292 JULY 18, 1995 10. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32796 PINK COMPANIES CHAIRS-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT/HUMAN 1449.77 RESOURCES DEFT/COMMUNITY CENTER. 32797 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 684.45 32798 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC T-SHIRTS-YOUTH RECREATION PROGRAMS/ROUND 4491 .60 LAKE MARINA. 32799 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC CONTACT KITS/AIR HANDLER REPAIRS/ 3314.07 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR-WATER DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER. 32800 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING-JULY/AUGUST SENIOR NEWSLETTER- 478.50 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM. 32801 PRO SOURCE FITNESS CHAIN/LIN/BEARINGS/SLEEVES/SPRINGS- 68.50 COMMUNITY CENTER. 32802 THE PROMOTION GROUP CAPS WITH CITY LOGO-SAFETY INCENTIVE 1188.29 PROGRAM. 32803 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC REPLACED DIAL-FIRE DEPT. 127.93 32804 PUMP & METERS SERVICE INC SIDE SEAL CAP-FLEET SERVICES. 26.63 32805 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 226.55 32806 RADIO SHACK INFRA PHOTO ALARM-LIQUOR STORE III. 74.54 32807 LEE RAY SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 682.50 32808 THE RETAIL MARKETING GROUP ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 50.00 32809 RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY CRACKFILL-STREET MAINTENANCE. 189. 14 32810 CITY OF RICHFIELD TRAINING EXPENSES-ADAPTIVE RECREATION 57.96 PROGRAM. 32811 CITY OF RICHFIELD TICKETS-ADULT PROGRAMS/FEES PAID. 330.00 32812 RICOH CORPORATION JULY 95 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-CITY HALL. 626.86 32813 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC SERVICE-WATER TOWER/OLD CITY WEST PKWY 14667. 15 RECONSTRUCTION/GOLDEN RIDGE RD CONSTRUCTION/TECHNOLOGY DR SEWER & WATER/ SUNNYBROOK ROAD DESIGN. 32814 ROAD HOME CHURCH COMPLIMENTARY CONCESSION COUPONS-4TH OF 6.00 JULY CELEBRATION. 32815 RUFF-CUT WEED CUTTING SERVICE-FORESTRY DEPT. 70.00 32816 RYANS RUBBER STAMPS RUBBER STAMPS-POLICE DEPT. 128.87 32817 RITZ CAMERA FILM/FILM PROCESSING-HUMAN. RESOURCES DEPT/ 33.91 COMMUNITY SERVICES. 82818 SA-AG INC SAND FOR PLAYSTRUCTURE-MILLER PARK 319.64 IMPROVEMENTS. 32819 ST CROIX RECREATION CO TABLE/CHAIRS/RECEPTACLE/ASH URN-CITY HALL. 1039.44 32820 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS INC TOYS/GAMES& CRAFT SUPPLIES-SOCIAL 1224.78 PROGRAMS/BANNERS/PENNANTS-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION. 32821 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT. 638.53 32822 DIANA SCHEFF SERVICE-ENTERTAINMENT-AFTER 5 GRANT. 200.00 32823 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1ST QTR 95 SENIOR OUTREACH SERVICES. 3250.00 32824 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC TRAINING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 446.25 32825 SIGNUM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC VINYL FOR DECALS-STREET DEPT. 165.08 32826 THE SKETCH PAD TYPESETTING COVERS & TABS/PRINTING COVERS- 396.78 FINANCE DEPT. 32827 M LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS & SUBSCRIPTION-UTILITIES DIVISION. 87.00 32828 PETER N SMITH SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 153.00 3689372 JULY 18, 1995 11 . JULY 18, 1995 VI 32829 W GORDON SMITH CO OIL/ANTIFREEZE-FLEET SERVICES. 666. 17 32830 SMITH & WESSON GUN REPAIR-POLICE DEPT. 44.59 32831 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION BUSH DRIVER SET-FLEET SERVICES. 95.69 32832 SNELL MECHANICAL INC AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM REPAIR-COMMUNITY 290.26 CENTER. 32833 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS SURVEYING EQUIPMENT RENTAL-ENGINEERING 74.55 DEPT. 32834 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC WALK IN COOLER HIGH PRESSURE CONTROL 127.50 REPAIR-LIQUOR STORE I. 32835 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY PAINT-STORM DRAINAGE PROGRAM/SEWER DEPT. 155.54 32836 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI SERVICE-TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP PROCESS 1250.00 BETWEEN TIME WARNER INC & HOUSTON INDUSTRIES. 32837 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISH INC ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 874.00 32838 SPORTS WORLD USA VOLLEYBALLS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM. 105.00 32839 EMMETT STARK SERVICE-GUYS & DOLLS PRODUCTION-ARTS 750.00 COMMISSION. 32840 STAR TRIBUNE EARLY SUNDAY PAPERS FOR RESALE-LIQUOR 16.06 STORE III. 32841 STEWART LUMBER CO TREATED TIMBERS-PARK MAINTENANCE. 59.28 32842 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ GRENADES/BARRICADE PROJECTILES/AMMUNITION- 5684.57 POLICE DEPT/GRILLE GUARDS-FLEET SERVICES. 32843 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC SERVICE-PRESERVE BLVD & ANDERSON LKS PKWY. 10473.05 32844 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FRONT BRAKE ROTORS/MOTOR KIT/TRANSMISSION 2020.19 REPLACEMENT-FLEET SERVICES. 32845 SUMMER HILL TREE FARM TREES-W 82ND ST/DELL ROAD. 600.00 32846 JIM STUKEL SERVICE-BOUNDARY WATER CANOE TRIP GUIDE- 805.00 SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM. 32847 SUN CONTROL OF MINNESOTA ;INC FURNISHED & INSTALLED WINDOW SHADES- 346.00 LIQUOR STORE III. 32848 SUPER JUMP SUPER JUMP RENTAL-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION. 319.50 32849 TIE SYSTEMS INC-MN ACTIVATED PHONE LINE-CITY HALL. 64.50 32850 JEANS THORNE INC SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER. 363.30 32851 U S CAVALRY UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT. 26.00 32852 ULTRA RIBBONS INC CASH REGISTER RIBBONS-LIQUOR STORE III. 98. 12 32853 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC KEY RINGS/DRILL BITS/NUTS & WASHERS-SIGN 304.06 DEPT. 32854 BRENDA UTING SHIPPING CHARGES FOR THEATER BOOKS-ARTS 23.06 COMMISSION. 32855 TRIA D VIKESLAND MILEAGE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM. 73.39 32856 WARNING LITES OF MN HAT WARNING LITES-STREET MAINTENANCE. 17.04 32857 WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE JULY 95 WASTE DISPOSAL-LIQUOR STORE I. 96.56 32858 WATER SPECIALTY OF MN-INC BLEED VALVES-COMMUNITY CENTER. 93.61 32859 WATERPRO FIRE HYDRANT OPERATING RODS-WATER DEPT/ 727.50 MASONRY SAWBLADES-STREET MAINTENANCE. 32860 JOEL WESTACOTT PRODUCTION SVCS VIDEO SERVICE-CITY COUNCIL/SOUND 197.25 TECHNICIAN-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION. 32861 PAUL WELIN SERVICE-SOFTBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 210.00 32862 MARIANNE WELLS DESIGN SERVICE-CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AD-HUMAN 80.00 RESOURCES DEPT. 2713134 JULY 18, 1995 12. JULY 18, 1995 VI 32863 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC-MPLS TIP TAP UNIT-COMMUNITY CENTER. 192.53 32864 WICKENHAUSER EXCAVATING INC BLACK DIRT/WOOD CHIPS/INSTALLED TILE- 8844.20 FACILITIES DEPT. 32865 DAVID WILLIAMS ENTERTAINMENT-AFTER 5 GRANT. 100.00 32866 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE INC WASTE DISPOSAL-EDEN PRAIRIE CLEAN-UP DAY. 5095.38 32867 WORDPERFECT MAGAZINES SUBSCRIPTION-POLICE DEPT. 79.95 32868 THE WORK CONNECTION SERVICE-PARK MAINTENANCE. 3218.74 32869 ZIEGLER INC GASKETS/NOZZLES/BATTERIES/CORE CHARGES/ 1245.28 HYDRAULIC HOSE/COUPLINGS/SLEEVES/PULLER GRIP-FLEET SERVICES. 32870 COLLEEN ZWACH SERVICE-TEEN WORK PROGRAM. 50.00 32299 VOID OUT CHECK 16.03- 32338 VOID OUT CHECK 272.00- 1853805 $2957690.26 1 JULY 18, 1995 13. DATE: 07/18/95 EDEN PRAIR E CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: XI.E.1 SECTION: Director of Public Works DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works Agreement for Engineering Services for Water Treatment Plant Expansion Eugene A. Dietz (I.C. #94-5350) ILL— I Requested Action: Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Engineering Agreement with Black& Veatch for final design services, construction and resident engineering for the Water Treatment Plant Expansion. Authorize Mayor and City Manager to execute document. Overview: As stated in the agreement, the scope of the work contemplates the services necessary to complete a 10 MGD plant expansion, including the building, process facilities, instrumentation, and site improvements (including landscaping, fencing, irrigation, and access roads) to the perimeter of the property. More specifically, the agreement provides the following: • All engineering and architectural services for the project, including local sub-consultants for architectural, site development and geotechnical services. Additionally, a consultant with expertise in designing public education displays. • The contract will provide a deduct alternative to delete incorporation of the southerly portion of the street maintenance facility in case the MnDOT has not completed acquisitions at time of contract letting. • Provisions to continue to the "partnering" process are included in the agreement. This will include an involvement process with staff and regulatory agencies as well as with the Environmental and Waste Management Commission during the design phase, which would culminate in a joint Planning Commission/Environment and Waste Management Commission/Council Meeting at final document stage and continue with the contractor during construction. • Similar to past water treatment plant projects, a resident engineer from the Black & Veatch firm will be on-site during the anticipated 25-month construction period. • Part of the design process will include an analysis of providing complete auxiliary standby power to operate the water treatment plant. If the cost benefit analysis results in a recommendation to install standby power, those design services would require a contract amendment. In addition to the agreement itself, reference is also made to the water treatment plant expansion conceptual design report dated April 18, 1995. This document is the result of the workshop process that occurred simultaneously with the Water Supply Plan. X 1. L�-• /. Financial Considerations: a. Attached is a side-by-side comparison of the 1985 expansion project and the current projepl, The design amendment provides maximum billing amounts as follows: Final Design $1,925,000 Construction Phase Services $ 740,000 Resident Engineering during Construction $ 400,000 x` Maximum Billing Amount $3,065,000 These amounts represent fees that will not be exceeded without an amendment to the scope of services for the project. We will be paying actual time spent for the project based on individual salary times a multiplier of 2.85 for design and construction phase services and salary times a multiplier of 2.3 for resident engineering services during construction. The following chart compares the two projects in terms of percentage of construction cost. 1985 Fees (')12) 1995 Fees (') Predesign Studies 1.14% 0.59% Final Design 9.04% 8.79% Construction Phase 1.61% 3.64% Services Resident Engineering 3.42% 2.00% Total 15.2% 15.25% Expressed as a percent of construction cost. rn Adjusted for inflation The fees represented in this contract amendment are the largest we have ever had and probably the largest we will ever have for any single project in Eden Prairie. Staff has spent a significant amount of time reviewing these fees and believe that they are an accurate representation of the level of effort necessary to complete a project as complex and as large as the one we are about to begin. As a bench mark, we did contact the Metropolitan Council Waste Services Division to investigate fees for projects of this magnitude. For complex waste water treatment projects, which are very comparable to water treatment plant projects, we found that final design fees between 8 and 10 percent are typical. The proposed fee for our project for final design is 8.79 percent. You will note that there is somewhat of a reversal in fees for construction phase services and resident engineering services between the two projects. In the past ten years, more of the burden has been shifted to the office staff for construction phase service during the contract period and less for resident engineering. The primary explanation is that the current situation in the construction industry is of tight bidding and low profit margins. The result is more claims for extra costs, additional requests for information and a much more complex process of submittals and re-submittals for approval of details of equipment and construction techniques. In the final analysis, Black&Veatch was selected as the engineer based on qualifications, M, fee is not low, but is competitive and we have a premier national firm hel in to a p p help in guide through this project. If we have a premier contractor when we award for this project, 1 would' anticipate that we will not reach the maximum billing amount -- especially in the at�a§of construction phase services and resident engineering. However, if the low bid is a com but only adequate contractor (such as our last plant expansion) the maximum billing amounts`'will likely be reached, but we will have the best available talent to reach our goal: a high plant expansion, built on time and in budget. The source of revenue for these fees as well as the construction cost for this expansion come from the water utility enterprise fund. X1. . /. 3 Eden Prairie,Minnesota June 13,190 Water Treatment Facility Expansion-Engineering Services Cost Summary 1985 Current Project Project Eng'l�een t~tes Design Services Fees $424,000 $1,925,000 Supplemental Design Services $185,000 Services Not Included in 1985 Site Surveys ($31,000 Geotechnical Investigation ($21,000 Consumer Education Design ($60,000 Evaluations of Facilities for Unplanned Improvements ($25,000 Design Services-Total for Comparison Purposes $609,0001 $1,788,0001 Predesign Studies(Water Supply Plan Not Included) $77,000 $120,000 Construction Phase Services $108,0001 $740,000 Resident Engineering $230,0001 $400,000 Subtotal $1,024,000 $3.048,000 Add Salary Inflation Per ASCE 1985-1995 39% $399,3601 - Subtotal $1,423,360i $3,048,0001 1 Add Payroll(Overhead)Inflation 9.6% 1 $136,6431 - Total Fee $1,560,003I1 $3,048,000 I Construction Costs Master Plan Opinion of Project Cost $9,500,000 i Less Distribution System Improvements not Authorized to B&V ($680,000i Subtotal Project Cost $8,820,000 Less Engineering,Legal,and Administration Budget ($802,000) Subtotal-Construction Cost $8,018,0001 t Add Inflation 1985-1995 28% $2,245,0401 Total-Construction Cost $10,263,0401 $20,000,000 ! Pee Vs:<:U: rtiCtion'Cost I, f t Fee/Construction 15.201 15.241 07i12i95 10:08 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0. 105 P003 AMENDMENT NO. I TO THE AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES This document serves as an amendment to the AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES, with an effective date of July 5, 1994, between the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Owner) and Black & Veatch (Engineer) for services associated with the design of a water treatment plant expansion for the Owner. The work covered by this Amendment No. 1 will consist of the Final Design, Construction Phase Services, and Resident Engineering During Construction for the facilities described in the Water Treatment Plant Expansion Conceptual Design Report dated April 1995 and is intended to complete the final ultimate plant expansion at the existing plant site. The work contemplates the services necessary to complete the building, process facilities, instrumentation, and site improvements, including landscaping, fencing, irrigation, and access roads to the perimeter streets and east property line located south of the proposed TH-212 ramp and will anticipate/accommodate the proposed TH-212 improvements as indicated in the agency coordination activity with MnDOT specified in task item 1 .8.1. The proposed chemical corridor to be located on the third floor of the building expansion will be deleted. An enclosed unloading area will be provided for the existing chemical unloading area to facilitate receipt of deliveries from flat bed type and utility vehicles. Architectural treatment will be provided to accommodate these changes as necessary. I . FINAL DESIGN SERVICES A. Meetings 1 . Arrange for and participate in informal meetings with Owner throughout the design phase to review progress and exchange ideas and information. One meeting per month, for a total of twelve meetings, is anticipated. 2. Meet with the City Building Inspection Department officials, Fire Marshall, and other City entities with b,ilding review responsibilities during the initial portion of design and at various design milestones to determine specif c code requirements and obtain concurrence regarding code issues. 3. Attend one meeting to discuss the documents with the Minnesota Department of Health (MOH) officia';. i B. Agency Coordination W3SED011295 Al-1 0?i12i95 10:08 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P004 1. Communicate with the Minnesota Department of Health (MOH) , Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) , Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) , and other Federal , State, and local agencies and reach an understanding on design objectives and performance requirements. 2. Communicate with the Owner's Utilities, Streets, Building, Engineering, and Fire Departments and reach an understanding on design objectives and requirements. 3. Submit a design memorandum outlining the proposed facilities to the MDH for their concurrence on applicable facility design criteria. 4. Coordinate with Northern States Power (NSP) regarding energy conservation issues for the plant and gather information to evaluate costs versus benefits of an engine generator for standby power supply. 5. Provide up to six sets of photographs of existing public education exhibits representative of those proposed to be included in this project. C. Public Information Program I. Assist Owner with a project presentation to the general public. One public meeting is anticipated. 2. Prepare colored architectural elevations of the exterior views of the plant facilities, site plans, and other information for Owner to utilize at public meetings to assist in explaining the scope of the project, architectural features, and color options. Two color schemes are anticipated. D. Surveying Services 1 . Engage the services of Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson to perform field design surveys for use in the preparation of construction drawings and specifications. Surveys will determine site topography, contours, and insofar as possible, existing utility locations. 2. Engage the services of Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson to prepare legal descriptions for the Owner' s use in obtaining an access easement for the portion of the main plant access road (including property within 10 feet of the back of curb) located on MTS property and for the purchase of any remaining property located west of the access easement. Al-2 w3SE0071295 07i12i95 10:08 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N8.105 P005 - E. Geotechnical Services 1. Engage the services of a geotechnical consultant to perform exploratory work and laboratory and field testing and to provide professional guidance in tests to be made at test locations based on preliminary drawings and designs, and professional interpretations of exploratory and test data. F. Architectural , Site Development, and Public Education Display Services 1. Engage the services of Tushie Montgomery Associates to assist in the development of the facility architectural treatment and layouts, public education facilities, and landscaping and identify building code requirements. TM1 will also participate in agency and public information activities, as requested. 2. Engage the services of Hansen Thorp Pellinen Olson to assist in the development of the site grading, access road alignments, and storm drainage system. 3. Engage the services of a consultant with expertise in designing public educational displays to assist in the development of the public education facilities- G. Construction Contract Documents 1. Prepare detailed drawings and specifications for the proposed construction work and for the materials and equipment required. The documents shall be prepared for selection of a private construction contractor on a competitive bid basis using the Engineer's standard formatting for technical specifications and drawings. The Owner's standard contract requirements will be incorporated into Engineer's standard front end contract documents. 2. Prepare one contract for performance of all construction work, including equipment procurement. 3. A schedule of values from the contractor will be required by the contract documents to identify construction costs related to the proposed Highway 212 construction project. 4. Work associated with remodeling of the existing maintenance shop and wash bay for use by the Utilities Section shall be included in the contract documents as a deductive alternative. 5_ Prepare an opinion of probable construction cost for the proposed work covered by the contract documents. W3sEo071295 Al-3 X/ - 1. 07i12i95 10:09 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P006 6. After the Owner has reviewed the completed contract documents, make any appropriate modifications and submit one set of revised contract documents to MDH for review and one set to Owner for record. 7. After receipt of MDH review comments and Owner's comments on final documents, revise if necessary. 8. Assist Owner in presenting the project to the Planning Commission, City Council , and the Environment and Waste Management Commission (I joint meeting anticipated) . H. Permits Acquisition 1. Provide in the construction contract documents a list of the permits which must be obtained by the construction contractor. 2. Provide assistance to Owner in obtaining the applicable permits from Federal , State, and local agencies: Assistance will include: a. Preparation of applications, exhibits, drawings and specifications as necessary for Owner's execution and submittal . b. Furnishing additional information about the project design. C. Communicating with agencies as necessary. I . Preaward Services 1. Coordinate bid letting date, time, and place with Owner, and prepare final Invitation to Bid. 2. Assist and advise Owner in placing the advertisements of the Invitation to Bid. 3. Identify potential contractors and suppliers, and distribute copies of Invitation to Bid. Maintain a record of prospective bidders and suppliers to whom contract documents have been issued. 4. Provide a sufficient number of sets of construction contract documents for bidding purposes, and distribute the contract documents to prospective bidders. 5. Distribute plan holders' list to recipients of contract documents prior to bid opening. w3SE0071295 Al-4 0?i12i95 10:09 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P00? 6. Receive deposits for construction contract documents. Process refunds to unsuccessful bidders. To reduce reproduction and mailing expenses, Engineer shall retain any portion of the deposit which is not refundable. 7. Conduct a pre-bid conference to: a. Instruct prospective bidders and suppliers as to the types of information required by the contract documents and the format in which bids should be presented. b. Review the contract documents. C. Receive requests for interpretations which will be issued by addendum. 8. Interpret construction contract documents. Prepare and issue addenda to the construction contract documents when required. 9. Assist Owner during bid opening. Answer questions during bid opening, make preliminary tabulation of bids, and review questionnaires and bids for completeness. 10. Review and evaluate the qualifications of the apparent successful bidder and the proposed major or specialty subcontractors. The review and evaluation will include such factors as work completed, financial resources, technical experience, and responses from references. 11. Prepare and distribute formal bid tabulation sheets, evaluate bids, and make written recommendations to Owner concerning contract award. 12. Review the Contractor's insurance certificates and forward the certificates to the Owner for acceptance by the Owner's legal counsel . Engineer's review of the insurance certificates is only for the purpose of determining if the Contractor maintains the general types and amounts of insurance required by the contract documents, and is not a legal review to determine if the Contractor's insurance coverage complies with all applicable requirements. 13. Prepare and distribute conforming copies of the construction contract documents. These services will include reviewing of contractor's bonds and insurance, furnishing the contractor unsigned construction contract documents, and transmitting the construction contract documents to Owner for signature and distribution. 14. Distribute 15 sets of the construction contract documents to the successful bidder. W35ED071295 A 1-5 - 07i12i95 10:09 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG � +6129498390 N0.105 P008 J. Miscellaneous Services 1. Provide an implementation schedule and preliminary recommendation regarding potential locations in the distribution system and type (ground or elevated storage) for the addition of a one million gallon storage reservoir. 2. Evaluate distribution system water quality data collected by Owner and incorporate any necessary modifications to the existing treatment process, such as chemical dosage and feed control , into the design of the facility improvements. i A 1-6 w3SE0071295 II. CONSTRUCTION AND RESIDENT ENGINEERING DURING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES A. Construction Phase Services Engineer will perform certain project administration services during the construction phase of the project. It is anticipated that the construction period until final completion will be 25 months. By performing these services, Engineer shall not have authority or responsibility to supervise, direct, or control the Contractor's work or the Contractor's means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction. Engineer shall not have authority or responsibility for safety precautions and programs incident to the Contractor' s work or for any failure of the Con- tractor to comply with laws, regulations, rules, ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to the Contractor furnishing and performing the work. Specific services to be performed by Engineer are as follows: I. At a date and time selected by Owner and at a facility provided by Owner, conduct a preconstruction conference. Engineer shall prepare an agenda for the conference. The preconstruction conference will include a discussion of the Contractor's tentative schedules, procedures for transmittal and review of the Contractor's submittals, processing payment applications, critical work sequencing, change orders, record documents, and the Contractor' s responsibilities for safety and first aid. 2. At dates and times selected by Owner and at a facility provided by Owner, conduct an initial and periodic partnering workshops by providing an experienced facilitator. 3. Review and comment on the Contractor' s initial and updated construction schedule and advise Owner as to acceptability. 4. Review the Contractor's initial and updated schedule of estimated monthly payments and advise Owner as to acceptability. S. Make periodic visits to the construction site to observe progress of the work, and consult with Owner and the Contractor concerning problems and/or progress of the work. One visit per month is anticipated. b. Review drawings and other data submitted by the Contractor as required by the construction contract documents. Engineer's review shall be for general conformity to the construction contract documents and shall not relieve the Contractor of any of his contractual responsibilities. Such reviews shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or W3SED071245 Al-7 r,r,r, r r r •n.i ��nr24,ra T racn T n i A Jract^oc � Ort'lQ__M__ 07/12/95 10:10 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P010 procedures of construction, or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. 7. Prepare a catalogued set of shop drawings and other data submitted by Contractor and deliver to Owner at the conclusion of the project. 8. Receive and review guarantees, bonds, and certificates of inspection, and tests and approvals which are to be assembled by the Contractor in accordance with the construction contract documents, and transmit them to Owner as a package with shop drawings and 0&M manuals. 9_ Interpret construction contract documents when requested by Owner or the Contractor. 10. Review and process the Contractor' s monthly payment requests, and forward to Owner if appropriate. Engineer's review shall be for the purpose of making a full independent mathematical check of the Contractor's payment request. Engineer is also responsible for verifying the quantities of work which are the basis of the payment requests. 11. Provide documentation and administer the processing of change orders, including applications for extension of construction time. Evaluate the cost and scheduling aspects of all change orders and, where necessary, negotiate with the Contractor to obtain a fair price for the work. Said negotiation shall be subject to the approval of Owner. Review claims, disputes, and other questions relating to the project and render a decision in an effort to equitably resolve disagreements prior to arbitration or litigation. 12. Analyze data from performance testing of equipment by the Contractor or supplier when the construction contract documents require the equipment to be tested after installation. Submit conclusions to Owner. 13. Collect and organize three sets of operation and maintenance data provided by Contractor. Each set will be placed in separate binders and provided with a table of contents, and submitted to Owner. 14. Upon substantial completion, inspect the construction work and prepare a punch-list of the items to be completed or corrected before final completion of the project. Submit results of the inspection to Owner and the Contractor. 15. Upon completion or correction of the items of work on the punch-list, conduct a final inspection to determine if the work is completed. Provide written recommendations W3SED071295 Al-8 9 $ concerning final payment to Owner, including a list of items, if any, to be completed prior to making such payment. lb. Upon completion of the project, revise the construction contract drawings to conform to the construction records. Submit one copy of wash-off mylar reproducibles to the Owner within 150 days after final completion of construction. B. Resident Engineering During Construction Engineer will furnish one full-time Resident Project Representative for a period not to exceed the period defined in the contract documents by the date for the project to be complete and ready for final payment. The Owner shall consider the recommended Resident and notify the Engineer of it' s decision to accept the recommendation. At the Owner's option, representatives of Owner may elect to travel to the site where the Resident is currently working to review construction records, project history, and other pertinent information and interview the Resident and representatives of the Owner for that project. The Resident Project Representative will observe the Contractor' s work and perform the services listed below. The Resident Project Representative shall not have responsibility for the superin- tendence of construction site conditions, safety, safe practices or unsafe practices or conditions, operation, equipment, or personnel other than employees of the Engineer. This service will in no way relieve the Contractor of complete supervision and inspection of the work or the Contractor's obligation for complete compliance with the drawings and specifications. The Contractor shall have sole responsibility for safety and for maintaining safe practices and avoiding unsafe practices or conditions. Specific services performed by the Resident Project Representative are as follows: 1 . Site Observations and Liaison with Owner and Contractor a. Conduct onsite observations of the general progress of the work to assist Engineer in determining if the work is proceeding in accordance with the construction contract documents. b. Serve as Engineer' s liaison with Contractor, working principally through Contractor's superintendent, and assist Engineer in providing interpretation of the construction contract documents. Transmit Engineer's clarifications and interpretations of the construction contract documents to Contractor. c_ Assist Engineer in serving as Owner's liaison with Contractor when Contractor's operations affect Owner's onsite operation. W3SED07I7.95 Al-9 AtA� Ast •nN X�. �• /. /3 7700VOTOGAIt�dr� O'1/12i95 10:10 BLACK-UEATCH W BLDG 4 +612949e390 NO.105 P012 "4 d. As requested by Engineer, assist in obtaining from Owner additional details or information when required at the jobsite for proper execution of the work. e. Report to Engineer, giving opinions and suggestions based on the Resident Project Representative's observations regarding defects or deficiencies in the Contractor's work and relating to compliance with drawings, specifications, and design concepts. f. Advise Engineer and Contractor or its superintendent immediately of the commencement of any work requiring a shop drawing or sample submission if the submission has not been accepted by Engineer. g. Monitor changes of apparent integrity of the site (such as differing subsurface and physical conditions, existing structures, and site-related utilities when such utilities are exposed) resulting from construction-related activities. h. Observe pertinent site conditions when Contractor maintains that differing subsurface and physical conditions have been encountered, and document actual site conditions. Review and analysis of Contractor claims for differing subsurface and physical conditions are supplemental services. i . Establish and furnish Contractor with necessary baselines and control points which will be used as datum for the work. Actual construction staking will be done by the Contractor. j. Visually inspect materials, equipment, and supplies delivered to the worksite. Inform Owner and Contractor when materials, equipment, and supplies do not conform to the construction contract documents. k. Coordinate onsite materials testing services during construction. Copies of testing results will be forwarded to Owner for review and information. 1 . Observe field tests of equipment, structures, and piping, and review the resulting reports, commenting to Engineer, as appropriate. 2. Meetings, Reports, and Document Review, and Maintenance a. Attend the preconstruction conference, and assist Engineer in explaining administrative procedures which will be followed during construction. w35ED07I295 Al-10 A � 07/12/95 10:10 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0. 105 P013 b. Schedule and attend monthly progress meetings, and other meetings with Owner and the Contractor when necessary, to review and discuss construction procedures and progress scheduling, engineering management procedures, and other matters concerning the project. C. Submit to Engineer with a copy to Owner weekly construction progress reports containing a summary of the Contractor's progress, general condition of the work, problems, and resolutions or proposed resolutions to problems. d. Review the progress schedule, schedule of shop drawings submissions, and schedule of values prepared by the Contractor and consult with Engineer concerning their acceptability. e. Report to Engineer regarding work which is known to be defective, or which fails any required inspections, tests, or approvals, or has been damaged prior to final payment; and advise Engineer whether the work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for observation, or requires special testing, inspection, or approval . f. Review applications for payment with Contractor for compliance with the established procedure for their submission, and forward them with recommendations to Engineer, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of values, work completed, and materials and equipment delivered at the site, but not incorporated into the work. g. Record date of receipt of samples. Receive samples which are furnished at the site by the Contractor, and notify Engineer of their availability for examination. h. During course of the work, verify that specified certificates, operation and maintenance manuals, and other data required to be assembled and furnished by the Contractor are applicable to the items actually installed; and deliver this material to Engineer for his review and forwarding to Owner prior to final acceptance of the work. i . Maintain a marked set of drawings and specifications at the jobsite based on data provided by the Contractor. This information will be combined with information from the record documents maintained by the Contractor, and a master set of documents conforming to construction records will be produced. w3SED071295 A1-11 X!. 6. 1. !S 07i12i95 10:10 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P014 j. Review certificates of inspections , tests, and related approvals submitted by the Contractor as required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders, or the Contract Documents (but only to determine that their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the construction contract documents). This service is limited to a review of items submitted by the Contractor and does not extend to a determination of whether the Contractor has complied with all legal requirements. k. Maintain the following documents at the jobsite. M. Correspondence files. (2). Reports of jobsite conferences, meetings, and discussions among the Engineer, Owner, and Contractor. (3)_ Submittals of shop drawings and samples. (4). Reproductions of original construction contract documents. {5). Addenda. (6) . Change orders. (7) . Field orders. (8}. Additional drawings issued subsequent to execution of the construction contract documents. Progress reports. (10) . Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all contractors, subcontractors, and major suppliers of materials and equipment. 1 . Maintain a daily diary or log book of events at the jobsite, including the following information: (1) . Days the Contractor worked on the jobsite. (2) . Contractor and subcontractor personnel on jobsite. (3). Construction equipment on the jobsite. (4) . Observed delays and causes. (5). Weather conditions. Al-12 N3SE0071295 ;t 07i12i95 10: 11 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P015 {6). Data relative to claims of extras or deductions. (7). Daily activities. ($). Observations pertaining to the progress of the work. (9). Materials received on jobsite. The diary or log book shall remain the property of the Engineer. 3. Assistance in Certification of Substantial Completion (a) . Before Engineer issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion, submit to Contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction. (b) . Assist Engineer in conducting final inspection in the company of Owner and Contractor, and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected. (c). Verify that all items on the final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to Engineer concerning acceptance. a Al-13 k35ED071295 07/12/95 10:11 BLACK-UEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P016 III. SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES A. Any work requested by Owner that is not included in one of the items listed in any other phase will be classified as Supplemental Services. B. Supplemental Services shall include, but are not limited to: 1. Owner requested, non-regulatory agency driven revisions to designs , drawings, and specifications previously approved by the Owner. 2. The addition of an engine generator to provide emergency power and to reduce electrical power rates will be evaluated as part of final design. Engineering services associated with inclusion of an engine generator into final design are classified as Supplemental Services. 3. Additional appearances at public hearings or before special boards. 4. Special consultants or independent professional associates requested or authorized by Owner. 5. Assistance with bid protests and rebidding which are not related to design issues. 6. Preparation for litigation, arbitration, or other legal or administrative proceedings; and appearances in court or at arbitration sessions, in connection with bid protests, change orders, or construction incidents. 7. Provision of laboratory and field testing, in addition to any listed in the Scope of Services, required during design and during construction, and of any special reports or studies on materials and equipment requested by Owner. 8. Preparation of environmental assessments or environmental impact statements. 9. Provision of a cultural resources or archaeological study on the construction site or archaeological consultations regarding artifacts that may be uncovered during construction. 10. Conducting pilot plant studies and tests. 11. Where field conditions differ from the conditions indicated in previously prepared construction documents or geotechnical investigations, additional design services not currently contemplated. W3SED071295 A 1-14 M 07/12/95 10:11 BLACK-VEATCH W BLDG 4 +6129498390 N0.105 P017 12. Support services for additional work in connection with public information. 13. Assistance to Owner on financially related transactions for the project. 14. Configuration of computer system software. 15. Changes in the general scope, extent, design, or character of the project, including, but not limited to: a. Changes in size or complexity. b. The Owner' s schedule, design, or character of construction. C. Method of financing. d. Revision of studies , reports, designs, or construction contract documents when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, or orders enacted subsequent to the preparation or completion of such studies, reports, designs, or construction contract documents or are due to any other causes beyond Engineer's control . e. Supplemental engineering work required to meet the requirements of regulatory agencies that become effective subsequent to the execution date of this Amendment No. 1. W35ED071295 A 1-15 /41. A IV. COMPENSATION Owner agrees to pay Engineer, in accordance with the provisions of Attachment B of the Agreement, for final Design Services, Construction Phase Services, and Resident Engineering During Construction as described in Sections I and II of this Amendment No. 1. , except the multiplier for Resident Engineering shall be reduced from 2.4 to 2.3. The estimated individual fees and maximum billing amount are as follows: Final Design $1 ,925,000 Construction Phase Services $740,000 Resident Engineering During Construction $400,000 Maximum Billing Amount $3,065,000 The maximum billing amount shall not be exceeded without an amendment to this Scope of Services and a corresponding, agreed- upon adjustment to the maximum billing limit. Payment for Supplemental Services as described in Section III of this Amendment No. 1 and reimbursable expenses shall be made in accordance with the applicable provisions of Attachment B of the Agreement. City of Eden Prairie, MN Black & Veatch Owner Engineer By 8y tJ� V�v Dr. Jean L. Harris Dam a W. McCarth y Title Mayor Title Partner Date Date By Carl J. Jullie Title City Manager Date W3SED011295 A 1-16