HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 04/04/1995TOUR OF HISTORICAL SOCIETY'S MUSEUM IN CITY CENTER
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1995 6:30 PM
THE CITY COUNCn. WllL TOUR THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY'S MUSEUM AT
6:30 PM.
AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COVNen.
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1995
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCn. STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
7:30 PM, CITY CENTER
CouneD Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean ~, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald
Case, Ross Thorfumson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-
Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jollie, Assistant City
Manager ~ Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert,
Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, and CouncU Recorder
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINFSS
n. OPEN PODIUM
m. MINUTF.S
A. CITY COUNCn. MEETING HElD TUFSDAY. MARCH 21. 1995
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
FOR CSAH 18, I.C. 52-175
C. RESOLUTION AWARDING STREET STRIPING. I.C. 95-5382
City Councll Agenda
Tuesday, April 4, 1995
Page Two
D. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR GOLDEN RIDGE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS AND CITY
WEST PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS. I.C. 94-5360
E. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ON VALLEY VIEW ROAD
EASTERLY OVER EDENVALE BOULEVARD
F. BRYANT POINTE TWO 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning
District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 and Approval of a
Developer's Agreement for Bryant Pointe Two by Dean Holasek.
Location: Rowland Road and Orchard Hill. (Ordinance for
Zoning District Change)
G. AUTHORIZE SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION
TO HANDLE CABLE LINE EXTENSION ISSUES
H. RESCHEDULE MAY 2 AND MAY 16. 1995 COUNCn.
MEETINGS TO MAY 9 AND MAY 23. 1995
V. PUBUC HEARINGSIMEETINGS
A. BLUFFS EAST 16TH by Hustad Development Corporation.
Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 1.69 acres, PUD
Concept Review on 210 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review on 12.88 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 12.88
acres and Preliminary Plat of 12.88 acres into 23 lots. Location:
Normandy Crest and Franlo Road. (Resolution for Comprehensive
Guide Plan Change, Resolution for PUD Concept Review,
Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to
RM-6.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from
March 21, 1995
B. BOULDER RIDGE by Dennis Lunski. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 27.1 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 27.1 acres, Zoning
District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 11.40 acres, Rezoning
From Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres and Preliminary Plat of 27.1
acres into 36 lots and 2 outlots. Location: N. of Mitchell Road,
West of Boulder Pointe. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review,
Ordinance for PUD District Review, Zoning District Change from
Rural to Rl-13.5 and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 and
Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 4, 1995
Page Three
C. SUTTON ADDITION (High Pointe 2nd Addition) by BuUtwell
Construction, Inc. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on
4.95 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 4.95 acres and
Preliminary Plat of 4.95 acres into 16 lots. Location: County Road
4 south of Senior Center. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Change, Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.S and
Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VB. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VIll. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. U.S. BENCH REQUEST FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO REVIEW
THE WCATION OF BUS BENCHES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-
OF-WAY
B. REQUEST FROM TANDEM CORPORATION TO REVIEW THE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS DENIAL OF
VARIANCE REQUFST #95-06
IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS &
COMMITTEES
X. APPOINTMENTS
A. HUMAN RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMMISSION
1. Appointment of one member to a three-year tenD to CUire
February 28, 1998
B. SENIOR ISSUES TASK FORCE
1. Appointment of a Senior Resident At-me for a tenD to
CUire October 31. 1996
2. Appointment of a Resident At-me (Social Service field) for
a tenD to expire October 31, 1996
XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
City Council Agenda
Tuesday, April 4, 1995
Page Four
C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION &
NATURAL RESOURCFS
D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVEWPMENT
E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
xu. OTHER BUSINFSS
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
•
MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1995
COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
7:30 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean Harris, Ronald Case, Patricia
Pidcock, Ross Thonmnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-
Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City
Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert,
Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City
Attorney Ric Rosow, and Council Recorder Jan
Nelson
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. All members were present.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Thorfinnson added item XI.A.2. Reverse Commute .Job Fair
n. OPEN PODIUM
m. MINUTES
A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. MARCH 7. 1995
Case asked that concerns expressed during the meeting be attributed to specific
Council members in order to clarify the minutes. The consensus was that the
minutes should be kept as brief as possible, while still identifying the unique
perspectives of the Council members.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the minutes of the
City Council meeting held Tuesday, March 7, 1995. Motion carried
unanimously.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. RESOLUTION NO. 95-46 SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR
CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP IN CABLE FRANCHISE FOR APRIL 18. 1995
C. APPROVE PROPOSAL FOR BFI TO OPERATE SPRING CLEAN-
UP/DROP OFF PROGRAM
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, March 21, 1995
Page Two
D. SET DATES FOR FUTURE COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOPS
E. PROCLAMATION FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY PROFESSIONS
WEEK. APRIL 16-22. 1995
F. PROCLAMATION FOR DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE. APRIL 23-30. 1995
G. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR WELL HOUSES NOS. 11 & 12.
I.C. 94-5356
H. RESOLUTION NO. 95-47 REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET
DESIGNATION
I. RESCHEDULE ,JULY 4. 1995 CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO .JULY 11.
1995
J. RESOLUTION NO. 95-48 ESTABLISHING NEW MUNICIPAL STATE AID
STREETS
K. RESOLUTION NO. 95-49 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENV ALE
10TH ADDITION. located at the SW quadrant of Valley View Road and
Equitable Drive
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to approve items A-K on
the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH 2ND ADDITION by Hustad Land
Company. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Church to Low
Density Residential on 5.49 acres, Zoning District Change from Public/R1-22 to
R1-13.5 on 5.49 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.79 acres into 13 lots and 3
outlots. Location: SW Comer of Bennett Place and Pioneer Trail. (Resolution
No. 95-50 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, Ordinance No. 10-95 for
Zoning District Change, Resolution No. 95-51 for Preliminary Plat)
,Beth Simenstad, representing Hustad Land Company, reviewed the proposal.
Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the project at the February 27,
1995 meeting and recommended approval on a 5-0 vote, subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report of February 24, 1995. He said that Staff
members from the Engineering and Planning Departments met with some of the
neighbors to review the project earlier this evening.
Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed
the project on March 6, 1995, and recommended approval on a 5-0 vote, per the
plan dated February 24, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Reports of February 24 and February 28, 1995.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, March 21, 1995
Page Three
Gray reviewed the concerns expressed by the neighbors during the informational
meeting preceding the Council meeting. There were concerns regarding traffic
in the area, and questions why the cul-de-sac could not connect to County Road
1 or to Purgatory Road. He noted that the County probably would not allow a
connection out to County Road 1.
Councilmembers questioned where additional connections in the area out to
County Road 1 or Franlo Road will be made, how the NURP pond overflow will
be handled, and whether any reconfiguration could be done to Lots 7, 8 and 9
because of their proximity to County Road 1. Gray said the location of
connections out of the area will probably depend on development plans for the
undeveloped parcels to the east and south of this project. Gray said there is a
storm sewer in place to carry storm drainage to the north and then to Purgatory
Creek and noted that the NURP pond will help to reduce the peaks in storm water
flow and will provide some treatment for runoff. Simenstad said they will need
to have the number of lots proposed in order to be able to proceed with the
development.
Case expressed concern about saving as many trees as possible in the area,
particularly near the NURP pond and on Outlot A. Gray said that the issue of
trees on Outlot A will be addressed at the time the additional parking lot for the
church is developed. He said the trees near the NURP pond are not considered
significant trees.
Elizabeth Cardarelle, 9912 Windsor Terrace, stated her concerns about the traffic
at the intersection of Blossom Road and Bennett Place, particularly with regard
to left turns out of the neighborhood and the school bus stop at that intersection.
She asked if a temporary traffic light or stop sign could be put in place there.
Gray said this issue was discussed at the neighborhood meeting and Staff will
contact the County to request a traffic study at that intersection to see if a signal
light is warranted.
Mike Mylin, 11180 Blossom Road, reviewed a petition from the neighborhood
opposing the proposal because of concerns regarding safety issues, additional
traffic added by the project, and destruction of the aspen grove at the comer of
Pioneer and Bennett. He asked if the NURP pond could be positioned
somewhere else as it would work better for the neighborhood that way.
Steve Andert, 9722 Purgatory Road, said he is concerned about children's safety
and the long term traffic flow. He asked if an entrance could be put through to
County Road 1 at Lot 8 and if the speed limits on County Road 1 could be
lowered. He was also concerned about the quality of the water in the NURP
pond. Gray said a larger pond has a better biology and will become a natural
setting.
Pidcock questioned whether other alternatives had been considered for the project.
Simenstad said they would be willing to look at a different proposal; however
they have worked on this since March of 1994 and had discarded a plan to put
the entrance at Purgatory Road because of the existing topography, the NURP
pond and the safety issues.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, March 21, 1995
Page Four
Mark Hutkey, 9833 Bennett Place, expressed concern about children's safety and
the size of the inlets and outlets for the NURP pond. He asked if landscaping
could be added to the pond and if there were plans to manage the pond.
Jody Anderson, 9717 Purgatory Road, said they purchased their lot at the corner
of Bennett and Purgatory because of the seclusion, and they enjoy the trees across
the road where the NURP pond will be built.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing.
Motion carried unanimously.
Council members questioned whether there is a better way to direct the traffic
flow, whether stop signs or signal lights could be used to help the traffic situation
on Bennett, and whether the neighborhood participated in the design process.
Dietz said Bennett Place was a difficult road to build and the decision was made
early in the design to not connect Blossom to County Road 1. He said the 13
homes will not add significantly to the traffic in the neighborhood. He noted that,
while there may be an opportunity for ponding on the north side of County Road
1, it is not practical to get the water from the southeast corner of the intersection
to the north side of the road. Gray said the traffic study should help determine
if stop signs or a signal light would help the traffic situation.
Simenstad said they sent a letter with the plat to the neighbors in early March
and there was some earlier contact when the connection was proposed at
Purgatory Road. Enger said the notice of the Public Hearing would have gone
out prior to the February 27th Planning Commission meeting.
Case said he would like to see some additional plantings near the church property
and some along Pioneer Trail and the NURP pond.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 10-95 for Zoning District Change; to adopt Resolution No. 95-
50 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change; to adopt Resolution No. 95-51 for
Preliminary Plat of 7.79 acres into 13 lots and 3 outlots; and to direct Staff to
prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations, to coordinate a traffic study to address the neighborhood
concerns about traffic problems, and to work with the developer to add
landscaping and trees as suggested. Motion carried unanimously.
B. DELEGARD COMMERCIAL by Curt and Duane Delegard. Request for
Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 88.5 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review on 3.66 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural
to Neighborhood Commercial on 3.66 acres, Preliminary Plat of 3.66 acres into
3 lots and Site Plan Review on 3.66 acres. Location: Dell Road and Highway
212. (Resolution No. 95-52 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance No. 11-95
for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from Rural to
Neighborhood Commercial and Resolution No. 95-53 for Preliminary Plat)
Bob Smith, representing proponent, reviewed the project.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, March 21, 1995
Page Five
Enger said the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at the February 27,
1995, meeting and voted unanimous approval, subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report of February 24, 1995. He said the project was not reviewed by
the Parks Commission.
Tyra-Lukens asked for clarification of the waiver request and if the number of
parking spots is adequate. Enger said it is a waiver for a zero lot line setback to
parking. He said this project is very small and has efficiency by sharing the
parking between the three buildings.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing; to
adopt Resolution No. 95-53 approving the Preliminary Plat; to adopt Resolution
95-52 approving the Planned Unit Development Concept; to approve 1st Reading
of Ordinance No. 11-95 for Zoning District Change from Rural to Neighborhood-
Commercial on 3.66 acres; and to direct Staff to prepare a Development
Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion
carried unanimously.
C. BLUFFS EAST 16TH by Hustad Development Corporation. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium
Density Residential on 1.69 acres, PUD Concept Review on 210 acres, Planned
Unit Development District Review on 12.88 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-
6.5 on 12.88 acres and Preliminary Plat of 12.88 acres into 23 lots. Location:
Normandy Crest and Franlo Road. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change, Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District
Review and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 and Resolution for Preliminary
Plat)
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to continue this item to
the April 4, 1995, Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
D. VACATION 95-01. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR
HAWTHORNE OF EDEN PRAIRIE 3RD ADDITION
Jullie said this has been requested to provide for lot line revisions proposed in the
replatting of these lots.
There were no comments from the audience.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public
Hearing; to adopt Resolution No. 95-54 vacating the drainage and utility
easements on Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4, Hawthorne of Eden Prairie 3rd Addition.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, March 21, 1995
Page Six
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Payment of Claims as
submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Case, Pidcock, Tbonmnson,
Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye."
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
vm. PETITIONS. REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. REOUEST FROM TANDEM CORPORATION TO REVIEW TIlE BOARD
OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS DENIAL OF VARIANCE REOUEST
#95-06
Jim Ostenson and Bob Putman, representing Tandem Corporation, presented their
request to review the Board of Adjustments and Appeals denial of their variance
request.
Enger said Staff asked the Legal Department whether the structures and sign
proposed would be considered a sign or a piece of art. Rosow said that,
according to the sign ordinance, what is being proposed here is a sign.
Pidcock said she had received several letters on the issue from residents who are
offended by putting metal trees where real trees should have been. Ostenson said
the sculptures proposed will be in an open field that was outside of the woods.
Case said he was not inclined to review the denial if this is considered a sign;
however we don't have ordinances regarding art to judge if it is art.
Referring to the similarity of this request to the Bearpath request reviewed at the
last meeting, Thorfinnson said he believes the sign is much more than the
wording; therefore we have to look at the whole wall or other structures included.
Council members questioned whether the sign would be used in advertising or in
a logo and whether the words in the sign would still require a variance. Ostenson
said this was not intended for promotional purposes. Enger said the size of the
words alone would require a variance.
Council members discussed how the sign package could be changed to fit within
the sign ordinance guidelines, including placing a sculpture on one side only.
Enger said we may want to take a look at the direction that entrance monuments
are going and see if we want to restrict their size in relation to the size of the
development itself. Ostenson said he would like to see a decision made on the
lettering so that they could get that in place and then revisit the sculptures at a
later time after further study has occurred.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to allow the proponent
to proceed with the lettering proposed and to continue the issue of the sculptures
after the Planning Commission has studied this and other entrance monuments in
the City and has returned to the Council with a recommendation.
City Council Minutes
Tuesday, March 21, 1995
Page Seven
Case said he was uncomfortable with approving the lettering since it is almost
double the size that is allowed by the sign ordinance.
Enger said he would propose that Staff run a report of all the entrance monuments
in town, where the variances are and the size of the various developments.
Pidcock withdrew the motion with the consent of Tyra-Lukens.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer the request to
Staff so that they can meet with the developer to resolve the issue of the lettering
on the sign and return with recommendations at the April 4, 1995, Council
meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to refer the issue of entrance
monuments to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendations,
and to ask Staff to prepare a history of what has been done with entrance
monuments in the City. Motion carried unanimously.
IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES
A. PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION -
Namin& of Conservation Areas
Lambert said that last fall the Council discussed naming an appropriate park or
area in the City for Dick Anderson. He said the Parks Commission at their
March 6, 1995, meeting recommended approval of naming the newly acquired
sites as conservation areas, per the recommendations of the Staff Report of
February 27, 1995.
Case said he had received some phone calls with concerns about naming this
particular property for Dick Anderson, and he would feel more comfortable
continuing this to the next meeting in order to check out the process and make
some phone calls.
After further discussion, the consensus was reached that, while the Council
concurred regarding their desire to honor Dick Anderson's role in preserving and
developing parks and trails in the City, it would be better to postpone approval
of this particular recommendation until further study could be done.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, continue this item to the April
4, 1995, Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 8 MARCH 21~ 1995
X. APPOINTMENTS
A. DISCUSSION ON ORGANIZATIONAL PROPOSALS RELATING TO HUMAN
RIGHTS AND SERVICES NEEDS
Harris reviewed the proposed reorganization of the Human Rights and Services
Commission and Committees, noting that the work load has increased as the issues being
addressed in the City have become more complex and time consuming. She said the
growth in the City has brought an increasing diversity as well as an increase in the
number of elderly residents.
Thorfinnson reviewed the proposed charters, responsibilities, and membership for the
three new groups. He noted that current members of the Human Rights & Services
Commission, the Human Rights Committee and the Human Services Committee will be
incorporated into the new structure. He said the Human Rights & Services Commission
discussed the proposed reorganization last evening, and they were very receptive to the
changes.
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to form a separate nine-member HumaI\
Rights Commission; to transition the existing Housing & Social Services Committee into
a permanent Housing, Transportation, and Social Services Board; to create a Task Force
to study the evolving needs of our senior population; and to accept the membership and
terms of appointment to the three groups as proposed. Motion carried unanimously.
Councilmember Case agreed to serve as the Council representative to the Senior Issues
TaskForce.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to refer one position on the
Human Rights and Diversity Commission, and one Senior Citizen at-large position and
one Citizen at-large position on the Senior Issues Task Force to Staff {or their
recommendations. Motion carried unanimously.
B. SHeRPA -Appointment of one member from a City advisory board/commission
through 12/31/95
MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to appoint Peg DuBord to serve
on the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Advisory Commission tbr a term
expiring December 31, 1995. Motion carried unanimously.
XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
1. Councilmember Patricia Pidcock -Icy Sidewalks
See item XI.C.1.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 9 MARCH 21, 1995
2. Reverse Commute Job Fair
Thorfinnson asked that Staff investigate what can be done to make a finn
commitment to the Reverse Commute Job Fair in April.
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCES
1. Sanding of Trails Policy (continued from February 21, 1995)
Lambert reviewed the letter to the Council from Pamela Tyner regarding her
request to sand the trails near Round Lake when icy conditions exist. He said the
Parks Commission discussed this in February and forwarded it to the Council.
After discussions with the City Attorney, Staff is recommending that a policy be
adopted regarding the removal of snow and ice from sidewalks and trails, as
outlined in the Staff Report of March 21, 1995.
Pam Tyner, 18710 Park Ridge Circle, said she was disappointed with the limited
recommendation from the Parks & Recreation staff and felt that we are letting
liability issues hamstring the City. She said she would like to see a greater
priority given to these needs in the wintertime, particularly when it is a clear and
present danger.
Councilmembers expressed concern about the extent of the financial commitment
necessary to deal with the extensive trail system in the City and the potential
hann of dumping salt on the trails.
Pidcock said she did not think this was an all or nothing proposition and that the
request involved two overpasses only that could be dealt with at a minimal
additional cost to the City. Thorfinnson said he thought we should take some
time to address some of the concerns expressed since we do not have to make a
decision tonight.
Lambert said he would recommend passing the policy as proposed and including
a line item in the 1996 budget review for salting and sanding trails for school
access and bus stops after some analysis of possible harm to the environment and
other concerns have been addressed.
MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt the new policy
dated March 21, 1995 as the amended policy for removal of snow and ice from
sidewalks and trails. Motion carried with Thorfinnson opposed.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 10 MARCH 21, 1995
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to continue the meeting to 11:15 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1. Marketcenter Urban Design Improvements Update
Brian Cluts, representing Cluts, O'Brien & Struthers, described the development
of the Marketcenter improvements. He said they plan to begin the Phase I
developments this summer and that they can combine funds from the lighting
project proposed by the Engineering Department to increase what could be done
in the street scape project. In order to handle the increased project they are asking
for a 5% increase in their fees.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to authorize an additional
amount of $28,000 to be added to the original fees of $148,000 to cover the
additional design services. Motion carried unanimously.
E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Midwest Asphalt
Jullie said the applicants have requested a further continuance of this item to the
April 18th meeting. He said they had conversations today and expect to receive
some meaningful responses to several issues soon.
Pidcock said she has received several phone calls from residents who find the
noise there to be intolerable.
Rosow said the MPCA was called back again to do some more testing.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue this item to
the April 18, 1995 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Resolution 95-Receiving Feasibility Report for Sunnybrook Road Street
and Utility Improvements, I.C. 94-5363
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adopt Resolution 95-
receiving the Feasibility Report and setting a Public Hearing for April 18, 1995
for I.C. 94-5363. Motion carried unanimously.
F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
XID. ADJOURNMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 11 MARCH 21, 1995
MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried
unanimously. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 11: 15 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DATE!
;;:....IIIII ... C·¥1I_=·,IW·,·.
SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR 4-4-95
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Finance -Pat Solie CLERK'S LICENSE APPLICATION LIST IV.A
THESE LICENSES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT HEADS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
LICENSED ACTIVITY. ,
CONTRACTOR (MULTI-FAMILY & COMM.)
J. W. Anderson & Associates
Bachmans, Inc.
E.C. I. Buil ding Contractors
J.G.M. Agency, Inc.
Tim Schmitz Construction
Sorensen Gross Construction Company
PLUMBING
Eide Plumbing Company
Fo rc i er Pl umbi ng
Lee Pl umbi ng
McGuire Mechanical Services, Inc.
Neu Pl umbi ng
Pl umb Right
Seitz Brothers, Inc:
Steinkraus Plumbing, Inc.
GAS FITTER
ARI Mechanical Services, Inc.
Contro 11 ed Air
Neu Plumbing
Seitz Brothers, Inc.
Steinkraus Plumbing
AdiODiDirection:
4-4-95 page 1
HEATING & VENTILATING
Control 1 ed Air
Steinkraus Plumbing, Inc.
Summit Home Center
Vent-A-Hood of the Twin Cities
UTILITY INSTALLER
Ii de Pl umbing Company
J.B. Diggers, Inc.
DELIVERY VEHICLE FOR FOOD
Blue Bell Ice Cream
. ~ .. . _ ..
DATE: 4/4/95
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO: IV.B
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Construction Cooperative Agreement Approval for CSAH 18
Rodney W. Rue
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve resolution approving Construction Cooperative Agreement for CSAH 18 from CSAH 1 to 1-
494.
Overview:
This Agreement identifies the County and the City'S (Eden Prairie and Bloomington) financial and maintenance
obligations for the CSAH 18 improvements.
Primary Issues:
The draft agreement included in the packet identifies our financial obligations as being approximately $223,600,
which includes primarily new watermain construction along the West Frontage Road. It also includes a $5,700
credit for our share of the temporary signal system at the existing CSAH 18/CSAH 1 intersection. All other
items we typically pay a share for (sidewalks, trails, curb and gutter, storm sewer, ponding, right-of-way,
landscaping, etc.) are being paid for by federal and matching state funds.
We have identified a couple of maintenance issues that we have asked the County to review and revise the
Agreement accordingly. The issues are as follows:
• The mainline portion of CSAH 18 includes lighting along the entire corridor. The Agreement indicates
that we are responsible for maintenance of this lighting that lies within Eden Prairie. We have indicated
to Hennepin County that the lighting maintenance should be the County's responsibility.
• There are minor issues relating to maintenance that need to be modified. These issues relate to roadways,
sidewalks, trails, drainage systems and traffic signal maintenance. Generally, each city will maintain
these facilities on their respective side of the new CSAH 18, with the exception of the west side of CSAH
18 north of the Anderson Lakes/Hennepin Parks area. In addition, the Agreement needs to more clearly
define that these facilities located within Eden Prairie as well as the portion of the West Frontage Road
which lies in Bloomington would be Eden Prairie's jurisdiction and responsibility.
At this time, it doesn't appear that a revised agreement will be available to be included in the packet. However,
Hennepin County has indicated by verbal agreement that a final executable agreement will be available by
Tuesday night. A copy of the final agreement will be available at the Council meeting on Tuesday night.
Financial Issues:
As indicated previously, the City of Eden Prairie's financial responsibility for this project is an estimated
$223,639.57 (which includes requested watermain, a small amount of sanitary sewer and a $5,709.43 credit for
the temporary signal at the CSAH 18/CSAH 1 intersection). This City share is proposed to be financed from
the Trunk Fund. Other financial obligations include the additional maintenance responsibilities, primarily related
to the new West Frontage Road (which connects CSAH 1 to Anderson Lakes Parkway). We hereby recommend
approval of-Construction Cooperative Agreement No. PW53-49-94 with the appropriate revisions made.
If, (j,/
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR
CSAH 18 BETWEEN
CSAH 1 (pIONEER TRAIL) AND 1-494
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Public Works has prepared plans for the construction
of CSAH 18 between CSAH 1 (pioneer Trail) and 1-494 as well as the reconstruction of CSAH 1
(pioneer Trail) from CSAH 18 to 1960 feet west as well as Anderson Lakes Parkway between 830 feet
west of Amsden Way and CSAH 18, within and along the corporate boundaries of the City of Eden
Prairie and the City of Bloomington;
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved said plans for the improvement of CSAH 18;
WHEREAS, a construction cooperative agreement has been prepared which identifies the maintenance
and financial obligations for the construction of said improvements; and
WHEREAS, the improvements contemplated in this project are important to the health, safety, and
welfare of the residents of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that said
Construction Cooperative Agreement No. PW 53-49-94 for State Project No. 27-618-61,27-601-22,
181-020-10, 181-107-05, and 107-424-07 (also known as County Project No. 9036) is hen:by approved
and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden
Prairie.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of
on-street parking on those portions of said Project No. 9036 within its corporate limits.
ADOPTEd by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 4, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
/tI,/J,Z
ORA F T March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
County Project No. 9036
County State Aid Highway No. 18
City of Eden Prairie
City of Bloomington
County of Hennepin
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of
______ , 1995, by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic
and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred
to as the "County", and the City of Eden Prairie, a body politic and
corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as
"Eden Prairie" and the City of Bloomington, a body politic and corporate under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Bloomington";
the two cities hereinafter referred to 'collectively as the "Cities".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The County and the Cities, along with the State of Minnesota,
have been negotiating to bring about the improvement of that portion of County
State Aid Highway (CSAH) No. 18 between 108th Street and 1494 in Bloomington
and Eden Prairie (Engineer's Stations 287+00.00 to 484+06.00) as shown on
County Engineer's plans and specifications for State Project No. 27-618-67
(a.k.a. County Project No. 9036), hereinafter referred to as the "Project",
which improvement contemplates and includes grading, drainage, concrete curb
and gutter, bituminous surfacing, reinforced concrete retaining wall, wood
noise barriers, traffic signals, signal revisions, bridges, wetland
mitigation, landscaping and other related improvements; and
WHEREAS, The Cities have expressed willingness to participate in the
construction cost of said Project and operating cost of said signals; and
WHEREAS, The above described Project lies within the corporate
-limits of the Cities; and
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN/DOT) has
heretofore prepared an Engineer's Estimate of quantities and unit prices for
the above described Project in the sum of Twenty Million Four Hundred Forty
- 1 -
/tI,13,3
(D R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
Two Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Three Dollars and Seven Cents
($20,442,523.07). A copy of said estimate (marked Exhibit "A") is attached
hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, The funding sources for the aforereferenced project are Federal
Demonstration Funds and State Fund 29 matching funds; and
WHEREAS; Included as a portion of the above mentioned State project is
the construction of water distribution system improvements for Eden Prairie
which are not eligible for Federal Demonstration Funds or State Fund 29 monies
and therefore the State will be requiring one hundred (100) percent cost
participation by the County prior to the award of the construction contract;
and
WHEREAS; The estimated cost for said Eden Prairie construction is Two
Hundred Six Thousand Ninety Dollars and No Cents ($206,090.00) as evidenced in
Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, It is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties
hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1992, Section 162.17,
Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
I
MN/DOT and the County will advertise for, receive and open bids for the
work and construction of the aforesaid Project. MN/DOT will enter into a
contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of
such bidder. The Contract will be in form and will include the plans and
specifications prepared by the County or its agents.
II
The County has entered into an Agreement with MN/DOT wherein MN/DOT has
agreed to administer the contract and inspect the construction of the contract
work contemplated herewith. The City Engineers of Eden Prairie and
Bloomington shall cooperate with MN/DOT, the County Engineer and his staff at
their request to the extent necessary, but will have no responsibility for the
- 2 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
supervision of the work. It shall be the responsibility of MN/OOT to ensure
construction in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
The Cities agree that the County and MN/OOT may make changes in the plans
or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably
necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and
completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by each City that
MN/OOT may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the
Contractor for the performance of any additional construction or construction
occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans,
within the original scope of the Project. Said changes may result in an
increase or decrease to each City's cost participation estimated herein.
III
The Cities agree to grant right of way to the County over those lands
owned by each City that are a part of the required right of way for said
Project. Said right of way shall be granted at no cost to the County.
The County or its agents will acquire all additional right of way.
permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Project. All
additional right of way, permits and/or easements are eligible for
reimbursement with federal and state funds and therefore will be obtained at
no cost to the Cities.
IV
Each City shall reimburse the County for its respective share in the
construction cost of the contract work for said Project. The total final
contract construction cost shall be apportioned as set forth in the
Preliminary Cost Participation Summary (marked Exhibit "8") attached hereto
and by this reference made a part hereof. It is further agreed that the
Engineer's Estimate referred to on Page 1 of this Agreement is an estimate of
the construction cost for the contract work on said Project and that the unit
prices set forth in the Contract with the successful bidder and the final
quantities as measured by the County or its agents shall govern in computing
the total final Contract construction cost for apportioning the cost of said
Project according to the provisions of this paragraph.
- 3 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995
V
Agreement No. ·PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
Each City shall receive credit for the existing temporary signal system
previously installed at the intersection of CSAH 18 and CSAH 1 per Agreement
No. PW 17-07-83. Said credit for the amount of Five Thousand Seven Hundred
Nine Dollars and Forty Three Cents ($5,709.43) is shown on Exhibit "8".
VI
In addition to payment of its proportionate share of the contract
construction cost, Eden Prairie also agrees to pay to the County a sum equal
to Two Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($2,650.00). It is
understood that said additional payment by Eden Prairie is its share of the
design costs incurred by the County for the water distribution system
improvements included in the Project.
In addition to the aforesaid payments by each City for its proportionate
share of the contract construction costs, each City also agrees to reimburse
the County for its respective proportionate share of the construction
engineering costs for the project. Each City's share of the construction
engineering costs shall be equal to ten (10) percent of the final amount of
its respective share of said contract construction cost.
VII
Within thirty (30) days after being invoiced by the County, each City
shall deposit with the Hennepin County Treasurer, one hundred (100) percent of
the estimated City's share in the contract construction and one hundred (lOO)
percent of the City's share in the engineering costs for said Project. Said
estimated City shares shall be based on actual contract unit prices for
estimated quantities shown in the plans.
In the event MNjDOT and the County Engineer, or his staff, determines the
need to amend the contract with a supplemental agreement or change order which
results in an increase in the contract amount, each City hereby agrees to
remit within thirty (30) days of notification by the County of said change an
amount equal to one hundred (100) percent of its respective share as
documented in the supplemental agreement or change order.
The Cities shall have the right to review any changes to the plans and
specifications as they relate to their cost participation. The respective
- 4 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
City Engineers shall approve any change orders or supplemental agreements
prepared by the County or its agents that affect their City's share of the
construction cost.
Upon the completion and acceptance of the work provided for in the
contract let by the State and the preparation by the State of a final estimate
computing and determining the amount due the Contractor performing the work,
the County shall determine and compute the total amount due the County from
each City as set forth hereunder. The County shall apply on the payment
thereof as much as may be necessary of the aforesaid funds deposited by the
respective Cities. If the amount found due from the respective cities is less
than the amount of the funds deposited, then, and in that event, the balance
of said deposited funds shall be returned to the appropriate City. If the
amount found due from each respective City exceeds said amount of funds
deposited, each City agrees to promptly pay to the County the difference
between said amount found due and said amount of funds deposited.
VIII
The County or its agents will prepare monthly progress reports as
provided in the specifications. A copy of these reports will be furnished to
the Cities upon request.
IX
All records kept by the City or the County with respect to this Project
shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto.
X
The County reserves the right not to issue any permits for a period of
five (5) years after completion of said Project for any service cuts in the
roadway surfacing of the County Highways included in this Project for any
installation of underground utilities which would be considered as new work;
service cuts shall be allowed for the maintenance and repair of any existing
underground utilities.
XI
It is agreed that each City shall, at its own expense, remove and replace
all City owned Signs that are within the construction limits of this Project.
Removal and replacement operations shall be coordinated with the construction
- 5 -
1/1, lJ. 7
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995
activities through the Project Engineer.
XII
Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
Upon completion of said Project, the County, at its expense, shall place
the necessary signs and the Cities, at their expense, shall provide the
enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on those portions of
Anderson Lakes Parkway, the West Frontage Road, CSAH 18 and CSAH 1 constructed
under this Project recognizing the concurrent jurisdiction of the Sheriff of
Hennepin County.
Any modification of the above parking restrictions shall not be made
without first obtaining a resolution from the County Board of Commissioners
permitting said modification.
XIII
It is understood and agreed that upon completion of the improvement
proposed herein, all street lighting, concrete sidewalk (except median
sidewalk), water distribution systems, sanitary sewer systems, and bituminous
walks and trails, with the exception of those located within the boundaries of
the Anderson Lakes Regional Park Preserve, included in said improvement shall
become the property of the City within which they lie and all maintenance,
restoration, repair or replacement required thereafter shall be performed by
the City of ownership at its own expense.
It is further understood and agreed that upon completion of the
improvement proposed herein, those portions of retaining and noise walls
constructed within City right of way shall become the property of the City
within which they lie and all maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement
required thereafter shall be performed by the City of ownership at its own
expense. Those portions of retaining and noise walls constructed within
County right of way will remain the property of the County and will thereafter
be maintained by it.
It is also further understood and agreed that upon completion of the
improvement proposed herein that the County at its sale cost, will maintain
only those drainage system components which exist between the outside
curblines of CSAH 18. All other drainage system components included in said
improvement, including but not limited to designated ponding areas, wet basins
- 6 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
and outlet control structures shall be maintained by the City within which
they are constructed. Maintenance costs for said outlet control structures,
wet basins and designated ponds shall be shared by the Cities and the County
according to the ratio of contributing drainage areas. It shall be the
responsibility of the appropriate City to initiate future cost sharing
agreements for maintenance of the drainage facilities.
It is also further understood and agreed that upon completion of the
improvement proposed herein, the Cities, at their sole cost, shall each
maintain those landscaping elemants installed within their respective
boundaries which lie outside County right of way and also those landscaping
elements which lie within CSAH 18 right of way on the residential side of the
noise walls.
It is further understood and agreed that upon completion of the
improvement proposed herein, that portion of Anderson Lakes Parkway
constructed within said improvement shall become the property of Eden Prairie
and all maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement required thereafter
shall be performed by Eden Prairie at its own expense.
It is further understood and agreed that upon completion of the
improvement proposed herein, those portions of Pioneer Trail, Bloomington
Ferry Road, West 78th Street and Highwood Drive constructed within said
improvement shall become the property of Bloomington and all maintenance,
restoration, repair or replacement required thereafter shall be performed by
Bloomington at its own expense.
It is also further understood and agreed that upon completion of the
improvement proposed herein that the County shall transfer jurisdiction of
those portions of the roadway known as the West Frontage Road to the Cities.
All maintenance, restoration, repair or replacement required thereafter shall
be performed by Eden Prairie. The Cities, at their discretion, may enter into
a separate agreement to provide the funding for said maintenance, restoration,
repair or replacement.
It is further understood that neither the County, its elected officials,
officers, agents and employees, either in their individual or official
capacity, shall be responsible or liable in any manner to the Cities for any
- 7 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
claim, demand, judgments, fines, penalties, expenses, actions or causes of
action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of negligent
performance of the hereinbefore described lighting, sidewalk, water
distribution systems, sanitary sewer systems, bituminous walk and trail,
retaining wall, noise wall, drainage systems and landscaping maintenance,
existence, restoration, repair or replacement by the Cities, or arising out of
the negligence of any contractor under any contract let by the Cities for the
performance of said work; and the Cities agree to defend, save and keep said
County, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from
all claims, demands, judgments, fines, penalties, expenses, actions or causes
of action and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's
fees, witness fees, and disbursements incurred in the defense thereof) arising
out of negligent performance by the Cities, its officers, agents or employees.
XIV
The County will be responsible for all monitoring and reporting as may be
r~quired by the various permitting agencies for the establishment of mitigated
wetland replacements constructed as part of this Project.
XV
Each City agrees that any Municipal license required to perform
electrical work within their respective corporate limits shall be issued to
the Contractor or the County at no cost to the Contractor or the County.
Electrical inspection fees shall not be more than those established by the
State Board of Electricity in the most recently recorded Electrical Inspection
Fee Schedule.
XVI
Eden Prairie shall install or cause the installation of an adequate three
wire, 120/240 volt, single phase, alternating current electrical power
connection to the traffic control signals and integral street lights at the
intersections of (1) CSAH 1 with the West Frontage Road and (2) the West
Frontage Road with Anderson Lakes Parkway included in the Project at their
sole cost and expense. Further, Eden Prairie shall provide the electrical
energy for the operation of said traffic control signals and integral street
lights at their sole cost and expense.
Bloomington shall install, cause the installation or perpetuate the
- 8 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
existence of an adequate three wire, 120/240 volt, single phase, alternating
current electrical power connection to the traffic control signals and
integral street lights at the intersections of (1) CSAH 18 with CSAH 1, (2)
CSAH 18 with Anderson Lakes Parkway, and (3) CSAH 18 with West 78th
Street/Highwood Drive included in the Project at their sale cost and expense.
Further, Bloomington shall provide the electrical energy for the operation of
said traffic control signals and integral street lights at their sole cost and
expense.
XVII
The Cities shall not revise by addition or deletion, nor alter or adjust
any component, part, sequence, or timing of the aforesaid traffic control
signals, however, nothing herein shall prohibit prompt, prudent action by
properly constituted authorities in situations where a part of such traffic
control signals may be directly involved in an emergency.
XVIII
Upon completion of this Project, the County shall thereafter maintain and
repair the following traffic control signals, including all components of the
Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP) system, all at the sale cost and expense
of the County:
CSAH 18 at CSAH l/Pioneer Trail
CSAH 18 at Anderson Lakes Parkway/Bloomington Ferry Road
CSAH 18 at West 78th Street/Highwood Drive
CSAH 1 at West Frontage Road
Further, the County, at its expense, shall maintain 110 volt power to the
line side of the fuse in the base of the signal poles for the integral street
lights. The City responsible for providing the electrical energy for the
signal system shall, at its expense, maintain the fuse, the luminaire and the
wire to the load side of the fuse in the base of the signal poles.
It is further agreed that upon completion of this Project, Eden Prairie
shall thereafter maintain and repair the traffic control signal system
installed at the intersection of the West Frontage Road and Anderson Lakes
Parkway, all at its sale cost and expense.
XIX
- 9 -
III,rJ,11
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
It is further agreed that each party to this Agreement shall not be
responsible or liable to the other parties or to any other person whomsoever
for any claims, demands, judgments, fines, penalties,expenses, actions, or
causes of actions of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the
negligent performance of any work or part hereof by the other as provided
herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense
any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of
whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of
its own work as provided herein.
XX
It is further agreed that any and all employees of the Cities and all
other persons engaged by the Cities in the performance of any work or services
required or provided for herein to be performed by the Cities shall not be
considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that mayor
might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Unemployment
Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while
so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence
of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any
of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the County.
Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged
by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided
for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of
the Cities, and that any and all claims that mayor might arise under the
Workers' Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of
Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims
made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part
of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to
be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the
Cities.
XXI
In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of
the Cities so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Hennepin
County Engineer or his designated representative shall manage this Agreement
on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the County and the
Cities.
-10 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
In order to coordinate the services of Eden Prairie with the activities
of the County and Bloomington so as to accomplish the purposes of this
Agreement, the Eden Prairie Director of Public Works or his designated
representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of Eden Prairie and serve
as liaison between Bloomington and the County.
In order to coordinate the services of Bloomington with the activities of
the County and Eden Prairie so as to accomplish the purposes of this
Agreement, the Bloomington Director of Public Works or his designated
representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of Bloomington and serve
as liaison between Eden Prairie and the County.
XXII
The prOV1Slons of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local
ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative
Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this
Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
-11 -
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year
first above written.
(Seal)
(Seal)
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
By: _________________________ ___
Mayor
Date : _______________________ _
And: __________________________ ___
Manager
Date : _______________________ _
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
By:~----------------------Mayor
Oate: ____________________ _
And: --------------------------Manager
Date: ________________________ _
-12 -
",
(0 R AFT) March 24, 1995 Agreement No. PW 53-49-94
CSAH 18; C.P. 9036
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ATTEST:
By : =-----:---:-:::~-:--~~---_.".....____, Deputy/Clerk of the County Board
Date: ___________ _
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
~~~~~~-~-----Assistant County Attorney
Date : ___________ _
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION:
By:
~~~~~~-~-----Assistant County Attorney
Da te : ___________ _
By: .,............,_--=--:-:---::-~~=____:_--Chair of its County Board
Date: ____________ _
And: _____ ~~--~~~--~----Associate/County Administrator
Date: ____________ _
And: _____ ~--------~~~~~
Director, Department of Public Works
and County Engineer
Date: ______________ __
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
By:=-___ ~~~~~-~~---Transportation Division Engineer
Date: ______________ __
-13 -
II
ITEM
NUMBER
2021.501
0451.602
0503.602
0503.602
0503.603
0503.603
0504.602
0504.602
0504.602
0504.602
0504.602
0504.602
0504.602
0504.603
0504.603
0504.603
0504.620 -0:::::: ..
~ , -~
~.[t
~r
..o~
,-
.0 b .~r_ -~
JOB NUMBER 950066
II0ll-PAI<TlCIPAlIIIG PORTlOII
'USC IlT IL lTY COIISTRUCTIOII
100.00% ttEIlt/EPIIi COUIITY FUNDS
Y P E COD I: 000
nEI-I
DESCI<IPTIOII -----------
NOBILIlATION
CRUSHED ROCK
8" CL EAII-OIJT ASSEfoIBL Y
8"X4" PVC I'IYE
4" PVC PIPE SEHER
8" I'VC PIPE SEilER
RElOCATE IiYURAIIT
U't'DRAIIT
8" SLEEVE
1" CORPORATIOII STOP
6" GATE VALVE AND BOX
8" GATE VALVE A/ID BOX
1" CIJRB STOP & UOX
1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE
6" I'IATER "IAIII-OllCT IROtl CL 52
8" IIATER ~IAIII-DIJCT IROtl CL 52
HATERNAIII FIl'TIIIGS
MIN N E SOT A DOT
PRELIMINARY HIGHWAY DETAIL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
S. P. 27-618-67 CSAH 18
AID NO. 684480
ESTIMATED ITEM
QUANTITY UNITS
---------
0.01 LUNP SUM
400.00 TON
1. 00 EACH
3.00 EACH
250.00 LItI FT
70.00 L III FT
1. 00 EACH
7.00 EACH
1. 00 EACH
10.00 EACH
B.OO EACH
15.00 EACH
10.00 EACH
391.00 LIN FT
136.00 L III FT
5735.00 L III FT
4865.00 POUIID
UIiIT
PRICE
600000.00
10.00
200.00
50.00
15.00
20.00
1200.00
1600.00
800.00
70.00
500.00
600.00
200.00
15.00
20~00
25.00
2.00
CATEGORY TOTAL
PAGE 110. 9
MARCH 2, 1995
AMOUIIT ------
$6,000.00
$4,000.00
$200.00
$150.00
$3,750.00
$1,400.00
$1,200.00
$11,200.00
$800.00
$700.00
$4,000.00
$9,000.00 " $2.000.00
$5.865.00
$2.720.00
$143.375.00
$9.730.00 •
$206.090.0~
-~ ,
~ -~
PRELIMINARY COST PARTICIPATION SUMMARY
Roadway
Storm Sewer
Water System Improvements
Bridges
County Supplied Signal Equipment
Subtotal
Design Engineering
10% Construction Engineering
Credit per PW 17 -07 -83
Total
CSAH 18 C.P.9036
S.P.27-618-67
MN/DOT & FHWA
$14,626,783.82
$1,406,219.00
$0.00
$4,133,430.25
~?QIQOO.OO
$20,236,433.07
Henn Co.
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
~Q.OO
$0.00
Bloomington
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
~Q~QQ
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
~~ZQ~~1~)(1 )
($5,709.43)
(1) Bloomington's credit due to be reconciled in future Agreement PW 13-07-95 for the
upcoming "clean -up" contract which will include payables by Bloomington.
Eden Prairie
$0.00
$0.00
$206,090.00
$0.00
~OO
$206,090.00
$2,650.00
$20,609.00
~~2Q9.43)
$223,639.57
Total
$14,626,783.82
$1,406,219.00
$206,090.00
$4,133,430.25
~70,000.00
$20,442,523.07
Exhibit "BII
Sheet 1 of 1
DATE: 4/4/95
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO: IV.C
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Award Contract for I.C. 95-5382 -City Street Striping
Mary Krause
Recommended Action:
Award of I.C. 95-5382, City Street Striping to Precision Pavement Marking, Inc. in the amount
of $31,199.50.
Overview:
Sealed bids were received at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 30, 1995, for the 1995 City Street
Striping. Four bids were received and are tabulated as follows:
• • • •
Precision Pavement Marking, Inc.
AAA Striping Service Company
Twin City Striping
Tri-State Striping
Financial Issues:
$31,199.50
$31,698.00
$34,251.00
$37,991.76
1995 City Street Striping budge"tamount is $27,000 under budget number 585-4440-50.
Striping of City Streets is a necessary maintenance responsibility of the City and must be
performed. The overall 1995 Public Works budget will remain within the approved totals.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement:
I.C. 95-5382 -City Street Striping
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on
the attached Summary of Bids; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to
Precision Pavement Marking, Inc.
as the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract
with Precision Pavement Marking, Inc. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the
amount of $31,199.50 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved
by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 4, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
DATE: 4/4/95
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO: N.D
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Approve Plans and Specifications for Golden Ridge Drive Improvements and
Alan Gray City West Parkway Improvements (I.C. 94-5360 & I.C. 94-5368)
Recommended Action:
Approve plans and specifications prepared by Rieke Carroll Muller, Inc. for City West Parkway
Improvements (I.C. 94-5368) and Golden Ridge Drive Improvements (I.C. 94-5360).
Overview:
Golden Ridge Drive is a residential street approximately 1300 feet in length extending south
from Rowland Road just westerly of Shady Oak Road. This residential neighborhood often (10)
homes is currently served by a bituminous surfaced street without City utilities. A public
hearing on utility and street improvements was held in June, 1994 at which time Council
approved the proposed project and ordered the preparation of plans and specifications for
construction beginning spring, 1995. The final plans have been reviewed with the property
owners at a recent neighborhood meeting. The neighborhood is anticipating construction
beginning in May.
The proposed City West Parkway improvements will complete the connection of City West
Parkway with Old Shady Oak Road. This project is the last phase of the Rowland Road/Old
Shady Oak Road improvement project authorized by Council in September, 1991.
Financial Issues:
Both projects will be constructed utilizing City funds and special assessments as outlined in the
financial plans contained in the respective feasibility studies.
/1/, 7), I
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer through Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc. has prepared plans
and specifications for the following improvements to wit:
I.C. 94-5360 (Golden Ridge Drive Improvements)
I.C. 94-5368 (City West Parkway Improvements)
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in
the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 4, 1995, at City Hall
after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City CIerlr and
Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30
P.M., Tuesday, May 9, 1995, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No
bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by
a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City
for 5 % (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 4, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATIEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, Clerk
DATE: 4/4/95
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO: IV.E
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Pedestrian Bridge at Valley Road and Southwest Regional LRT Trail
Alan Gray
Recommended Action:
Approve Plans and Specifications prepared by Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District for
Pedestrian Bridge 27A26 over Valley View Road at the Southwest Regional LRT Trail.
Overview:
Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District proposes to construct a pedestrian bridge over Valley
View Road to provide a grade-separated crossing for the Southwest Regional LRT Trail. The
LRT Trail crosses Valley View Road just easterly of Edenvale Boulevard (old Graffiti Bridge
site). A pedestrian bridge at this location will provide for a safer crossing of Valley View Road
for trail users.
Primary Issues:
There are numerous structural systems used for these types of pedestrian bridges including
laminated wood beams, pre-fabricated steel trusses, steel I-beams and pre-stressed concrete
beams. State Statutes allow for these type of bridges to be bid as design-build projects. The
agency contracting for the bridge construction provides standard details applicable to the various
structural systems available in the market place. The bid process allows for competition between
various structural systems. Final detail plans are then prepared by the successful bidder utilizing
the most competitively priced structural system.
The appearance of the bridge will vary depending on the structural system proposed by the
successful low bidder. This allows for only limited opportunity to influence the aesthetic
qualities of the bridge. Hennepin Parks proposes to work with the City of Eden Prairie in
selecting colors to be used on steel and concrete surfaces to develop the best aesthetics for the
structural system selected through the design-build process.
Financial Issues:
Construction of the pedestrian bridge will be funded entirely by the Suburban Hennepin Regional
Park District utilizing federal funds. The Park District will also own and maintain the pedestrian
bridge. The City's cost will be limited to staff time involved with plan review and construction
coordination.. .
•
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS PREPARED BY
SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 27 A26
(I.C. 94-5348)
WHEREAS, Design-Build plans for Pedestrian Bridge 27A26 and Approaches with the limits
of the City at Valley View Road and the Southwest Regional LRT Trail have been prepared and
presented t the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that said plans be
approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on April 4, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
John D. Frane, City Clerk
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-4-95
SECTION: 2ND READING
ITEM NO. nz: . .r
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger BRYANT POINTE TWO
Scott Kipp
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
• Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5;
• Approval of a Developer's Agreement
Supporting Reports:
1. Zoning Ordinance
2. Developer's Agreement
IT. f" -I
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
BRYANT POINTE TWO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPI'IONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WIDCH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District
and be placed in the RI-13.5 District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from
the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RI-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in
each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the
Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby
adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's
Agreement dated as of April 4, 1995, entered into between Dean A. Holasek, and the City of Eden Prairie,
and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of
March, 1995, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular
meeting of the City Council of said City on the 4th day of April, 1995.
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on --------------------------
./
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
BRYANT POINTE TWO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Rowland Road and Orchard Hill
from Rural to RI-13.5 on 1.15 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit
A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date:
ATTEST:
/s/ John D. Frane
City Clerk
This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
Is/Jean L. Harris
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ________ _
(A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
rr,+.-3
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Bryant Pointe Two
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2,
TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH, RANGE 22 WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIOrAN
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 2, THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 TO
THE SOUTH 114 CORNER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH, RANGE 22
WEST OF THE 5TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 55
MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 233.69 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 14
MINUTES EAST 406.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30
. SECONDS WEST 310.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 43 MINUTES EAST
175.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 28 MINUTES EAST 90.00 FEET TO
THE ACTUAL POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH 19 DEGREES 28 MINUTES EAST 215.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 64 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 235.81 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 19 DEGREES 28 MINUTES WEST 215.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64
DEGREES 03 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 235.81 FEET TO THE ACTUAL POINT
OF BEGINNING.
JT. -r. -to)
Bryant Pointe Two
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of April 4, 1995, by Dean Holasek, for
the estate of Anna A. Hoiasek, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to
RI-13.5 on 1.15 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.15 acres for construction of 2 lots and road
right-of-way, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the
Property;"
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for
Rezoning, and Resolution No. for Preliminary Plat, Developer covenants and agrees
to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows:
1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials
reviewed and approved by the City Council on March 7, 1995, and dated March
1, 1995, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and
modifications as provided herein.
2. EXHffiIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and
observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein
of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C,
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Developer agrees that sewer and water stubs
are necessary for proposed Lot 2 of this project.
Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the
Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's approval of plans for the construction of the sewer and water
connection, including plans for the restoration of Orchard Hill. Developer shall
provide a surety in an amount and form acceptable to the City Engineer to cover
said construction work and restoration in accordance with City code.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the plans
concurrent with any grading or construction on the property, and in accordance
with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
J,Y . .f. -5"
Developer also agrees that he shall be responsible for the one time charge of
$7,400.000 for the sewer and water connection fee. In addition, the developer
is in agreement that the property will be subject to a $2,462.60 Trunk sewer and
water assessment in the fall of 1995.
4. FINAL GRADING: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan
contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit
or permit for any construction for the Property, Developer shall submit and
obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan
for the Property.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, or permit for any construction on the
Property, Developer shall submit and obtain City Engineer's written approval of
an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. Erosion control plan shall include all
boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf
restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City'S
Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the plans
concurrent with the site grading in accordance with the terms and conditions of
Exhibit C, attached hereto.
5. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS:
Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property,
Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief
Building Official's approval of, plans for demolition and/or removal of existing
structures, septic systems, and wells on the Property.
Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a
certified check in the amount of $1 ,000.00 to guarantee that the structures, well,
and/or septic system have been properly demolished or removed and that the
Property has been restored to grade.
City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the demolition or
removal is completed and after it is verified by City that the structures, well,
and/or septic system have been properly demolished or removed and that the
Property has been restored to grade.
6. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or
construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building
Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of detailed plans for
the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and
method of construction to be used for said retaining walls.
rr,f ... b
Upon approval by the Chief Building Official, Developer agrees to construct, or
cause to be constructed, said retaining walls, as approved by the Chief Building
Official, concurrent with the grading, or any construction on the Property, and
in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
7. TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN: The Developer has submitted to the City and
has received the City's approval of a tree replacement plan for the Property.
Prior to any grading permit, or permit for any construction on the Property,
Developer shall furnish to the Director of Community Development and receive
the Director's approval of a tree replacement surety equal to 150 % of the cost of
said improvements as required by City code. Developer will implement, or cause
to be implemented said tree replacement plan prior to, or concurrent with building
construction, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C,
attached hereto.
8. TRAIL PREPARATION: Prior to issuance of any grading permit, or any
permit for construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director
of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department, and receive written
approval from the Director, a plan for the grading of a ten-foot wide pad within
the Rowland Road right-of-way. Said graded trail pad shall be for the provision
of an eight-foot wide bituminous trail to be installed by the City at a future date.
Concurrent with any grading, or construction on the property, Developer shall
grade the trail pad in accordance with said approved plan.
IJ[.f.-?
EROSION CONTROL POLICY January 1, 1993
MISSION STATEMENT
At any given time, Eden Prairie has a large amount of property denuded of vegetation with land alteration in
progress. Erosion may result from ongoing construction activities such as road and highway projects,
industrial, commercial, residential development, and individual house construction. These activities are prone
to erosion, producing sediment that can infiltrate storm sewer systems, affect water quality, clog streets and
sidewalks, and cause damage to property. The City Council has recognized the need and directed City staff
to devise a comprehensive erosion control policy. The benefits of these controls can be realized in improved
water quality, increased safety and monetary savings in clean up efforts. The City Council has directed the
following Policy to be implemented:
1. All construction projects permitted by the City of Eden Prairie which result in the temporary disturbance
of vegetative or non-vegetative surfaces protecting soils from erosion require the use of Best
Management Practices (BMP's) as outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's manual,
Protecting Water Quality In Urban Areas, to mitigate the impact of erosion on wetland and water
resources. The City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may impose special conditions to permits
which stipulate erosion control procedures and/or direct the installation of erosion control features or
the clean up of erosion at construction sites. Permits effected by this policy include all grading permits,
building permits, and permits for the installation of utilities.
2. All erosion control systems stipulated in the permit shall be installed prior to the issuance of the permit.
Supplemental erosion control systems ordered by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections shall
be installed within 48 hours.
3. All erosion control systems must be maintained by the permittee in a functional condition until the
completion of turf and/or structural surfaces which protect the soil from erosion. The permittee must
inspect erosion control bi-weekly and immediately after each rainfall event of .5 inches or more.
Needed maintenance shall be performed within 48 hours.
4. Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall be utilized at all construction sites to minimize the trackage
or spillage of soil on public streets or highways. BMP's may include, but are not limited to, rock
construction entrances, washing stations, frequent cleaning of streets adjacent to the construction site
or limiting operations when site conditions are unmanageable. Trackage or spillage of soil on a public
street or highway must be cleaned by power sweepers within the time frame stipulated in the permit
special conditions or as ordered by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections.
5. If erosion breaches the perimeter of a construction site, the permittee shall immediately develop a clean
up and restoration plan, obtain the right-of-entry from the adjoining property owner, and implement the
clean up and restoration plan within 48 hours of obtaining the adjoining property owner's permission.
In the event eroded soils enter onto or are tracked or spilled on a public street, highway, sidewalk or
trail, the permittee shall remove the soil material and thoroughly sweep the street or sidewalk surface
within four hours. If eroded soils enter, or entrance appears imminent, into wetlands or other water
bodies, clean up and repair shall be immediate. Permittee shall provide all traffic control and flagging
required to protect the traveling public during the clean up operations.
1[,+.-8
6. When a permittee fails to conform to any provision of this policy within the time stipulated in a written
notification, the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may take the following actions:
a. Withhold the scheduling of inspections and/or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
b. Direct the correction of the deficiency by City forces or separate contract.
The issuance of a permit constitutes a right-of-entry for the City or its contractor to enter upon the
construction site for the purpose of correcting deficiencies in erosion control.
All costs incurred by the City in correcting erosion control deficiencies shall be reimbursed by the
permittee. All invoices for erosion control correction shall be due and payable within 30 days.
Invoices not paid within 30 days shall accrue interest at a rate of 1 % per month.
Each charge for correction of erosion deficiencies shall be a lien upon the property to which the permit
applies. Invoices more than 30 days old on September 30 or any year or on any other date as
determined by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may be assessed against the property.
As a condition of the permit, the owner shall waive notice of any assessment hearing to be conducted
by the City, concur that the benefit to the property exceeds the amount of the proposed assessment and
waive all rights by virtue of Minnesota Statute 429.081 to challenge the amount or validity of the
assessment.
I, We, The Undersigned, hereby accept the terms and conditions of the Erosion Control Policy dated January
1, 1993 as set forth and agree to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the City of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota.
Applicant's Name (Please Print) Date
Applicant's Signature Applicant's Title
Office Phone No. Mobile No. Home No.
Development Name: Lot: Block:
IT. f. ·9
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
April 4, 1995
SECTION: Consent Calendar
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Admin.--C. Dawson Authorize SWSCC To Handle Cable Line
IV.G Extension Issues
Requested Action:
It is recommended that the Council adopt the Resolution to authorize the Southwest Suburban Cable
Commission to act on behalf of the City regarding the extension of cable lines to non-residential
buildings.
The proposed resolution is essentially a housekeeping matter to clarify the role of the Commission and the
City on these issues.
Back~ound:
From time to time, the City and the SWSCC receive requests regarding the extension of cable service
lines to potential non-residential customers. .
The cable franchise requires cable lines to be extended when the density of dwelling units reaches 40 units
per mile. Any non-residential buildings along these lines are to be served at no additional cost beyond the
normal installation fee. If the density does not exceed 40 units per mile, then the franchisee (currently
Paragon Cable) may request additional fees to serve those potential customers. The requesting potential
customer may accept the cost proposed by the franchisee, or request that the City Council intervene and
establish a cost contribution formula.
The cable franchise anticipated that the SWSCC would be the franchising body and would resolve issues
regarding this line extension policy. Indeed, it was expected that such matters would be handled by the
SWSCC administrator/staff. None of the five cities, however, have designated the Commission as the
franchising authority. Thus, the SWSCC technically does not have the power to handle such matters on
behalf of a member city without express authority to do so from that city. (Otherwise, these technicalities
could end up needing to be handled, at a City Council level.)
The proposed resolution would make it clear that the SWSCC and its staff are acting as agents of the City
on these issues.
Supporting Document:
* Proposed Resolution
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION
TO HANDLE ISSUES ARISING UNDER THE LINE EXTENSION POLICY
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota receives requests for assistance in resolving issues
regarding the cost of connection of non-dwelling buildings to cable service in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City'S cable franchise ordinance states that issues regarding the line extension policy
referenced in Article V, Section 2, must come before the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes it is appropriate for the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission to
act as its agent and negotiate such policies with cable franchisees,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the
Southwest Suburban Cable Commission is directed and authorized to review the applicable line extension
policy and engage in negotiations with cable franchisees regarding such matters of line extension policy and
the connection of non-dwelling buildings to cable service.
Adopted by the City Council on April 4, 1995
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
Attest:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-4-95
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. -s:z: A.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger BLUFFS EAST 16TH
Michael Franzen
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
• 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 12.88 acres and Planned
Unit Development District Review on 12.88 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential on 1.69 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 210 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 12.88 acres into 23 lots.
Background:
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the Bluffs East 16th project at the February
27, 1995 Planning Commission meeting.
Supporting Reports:
1. Staff Report dated February 24, 1995
2. Supplemental Staff Report dated February 28, 1995
3. Planning Commission Approved Minutes of February 27, 1995
4. Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change
5. Resolution for PUD Concept Review
6. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
7. Correspondence
-rt.:. A. -\
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
BLUFFS EAST 16TH
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and
comment; and
WHEREAS, the proposal of Bluffs East 16th by Hustad Development Corporation for
construction of 23 lots on approximately 1.69 acres, requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 1.69 acres from
Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential all located at Normandy Crest and
Franlo Road.
ADOPfED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
V.A. -2-
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
BLUFFS EAST 16TH
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT OF BLUFFS EAST 16TH
FOR HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Bluffs
East 16th PUD Concept by Hustad Development Corporation and considered their request for
approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 4, 1995;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Bluffs East 16th, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as
outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
dated March 30, 1995.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission
dated February 27, 1995.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
BLUFFS EAST 16TH
Legal Description
Exhibit A
The property legal description for the piece north of the PUD
limits is as follows: That part of the North 790 feet of the
northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of section 36, township 116
range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly and
southwesterly of the highway 169 frontage-road and east of the
east right-of-way line of Normandy Crest.
The portion of the plat that is within the Bluff country PUD
is described as; that part of outlot E, Bluf£s East 6th
Addition, lying west of the highway 169 frontage road.
Y.A. -'4
BLUFFS EAST 16TH
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF BLUFFS EAST 16TH
FOR HUSTAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Bluffs East 16th for Hustad Development Corporation dated March
30, 1995, consisting of 12.88 acres, a copy of which is on ftle at the City Hall, is found to be
in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and
amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
v.A..·5'
Minutes
Planning Commission
February 27, 1995
B. BLUFFS EAST 16TH by Hustad Development Corporation. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium
Density Residential on 1.69 acres, PUD Concept Review on 210 acres, Planned
Unit Development District Review on 12.88 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-
6.5 on 12.88 acres and Preliminary Plat of 12.88 acres into 23 lots. Location:
Normandy Crest and Franlo Road.
,
Franzen introduced Beth Simenstad, representing Hustad Corporation, who will
make a brief presentation, after which Staff will review the Staff Report.
Beth Simenstad, representing Hustad Development Corporation, reviewed her
project with the Planning Commission. She noted that tree loss is at 32 %, and
the tree replacement requirement is estimated to be 94 caliber inches. They have
agreed with the neighbors to plant 18 six foot trees along the property line which
is adjacent to. the Bluffs East 7th Addition.
Mahoney asked what the cost of the homes are. The builder replied that the price
starts at $279,000.
Franzen reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commission, directing their
attention to the five primary issues. He noted that the tree loss compares
favorably. Regarding architecture compatibility with the surrounding area, stucco
and shake shingle would be consistent with the previous PUD in the area. The
storm water quality is different from the last proposal because of some existing
7
Minutes
Planning Commission
February 27, 1995
circumstances. This is a situation where there is a large volume of water that
goes into the pond not pretreated. Faced with the requirements of what they do
with pretreatment ponds, they looked at an alternative location for this
pretreatment pond. This result in the loss of vegetation at the low portion of the
slope, or take out additional buildings to make it work. The amount of runoff
water is small. Staff recommends approval based on the recommendations of the
Staff Report as to option #1.
Sandstad referred to the 20 foot retaining wall mentioned in the Staff Report.
Franzen noted that it has changed with the shifting of the driveway a little to the
east. They were able to lower the height of the walls to 10 feet.
Schlampp asked if the pond is a wetland or a lake. Franzen replied that it's a
wetland. He noted that the DNR was out with the Engineering Staff and the
project developers last week to look at establishing a high water mark for the lake
because Staff is concerned about preserving the existing vegetation.
Schlampp expressed concern about putting in a pumping station in order to
maintain a level from the development that must accommodate runoff from
Highway 18.
Bill Kinnard, 9612 Falcon Way, expressed concern about the elimination of any
of these woods because it is going to completely devastate the natural
environment. They built on this lot because of the natural setting because the
trees created privacy and sound barrier from the highway. When they purchased
their lot, they paid a premium price because they were told nothing would be
built on these woods.
Foote asked if they purchased their house from Hustad. Kinnard replied that they
didn't.
Clinton asked if they have woods on their lot. Kinpard replied that they have a
few trees. The woods actually becomes a part of their lot visually. Their lot is
on the edge of the woods.
Roger Perkins, 9624 Falcons Way, expressed concern about the trees in front
of them being maintained, and a development being built at that site. They were
told that these two things would not happen when they purchased their home. He
8
-sr. A.. -7
Minutes
Planning Commission
February 27, 1995
also expressed concern about the amount of noise when the City continues 169.
Marion Nutter. 9648 Falcons Way, expressed concern about the tree
replacement not being the same as the original trees. This area will not leave
much for the wildlife in the area.
Douglas Preston, 9664 Falcons Way, noted that he was the first resident to
move into this development on Falcons Way and has seen all the development
take place. He expressed concern about the building of 22 homes rather than 13
as he was originally told, and that they would not go up into the woods. He said
that this is one of the most beautiful places in Eden Prairie and does not want to
see it destroyed. He is not in favor of putting up another wall because they need
to keep the environment fresh. He is also opposed to putting in new trees
because it takes long for them to grow.
Sandstad noted that the City'S 30 % general rule for tree loss is adequate enough.
This particular project meets the 30 % tree loss requirement.
Marshall Anderson, 9652 Falcons Way, noted that he shares the same concerns
that the other residents have.
Jerry Lori, 9684 Falcons Way, noted that he feels the development is fine and
that it's a great development. He expressed concern about the tree ordinance
being a crutch, and that it must include the height and density of the trees along
with the circumference.
Barbara Taft, 10437 Falcons Way, noted that she lives on the west side of the
pond and knew there were going to be townhomes built because they need the
buffers. She has lived there for five and a half years and has found that there
was drainage' into the pond, but not an outlet. As a result, a number of trees
were lost because of too much water in the pond. There was no way to get rid
of excess water without pumping. There were about 30 trees lost and she didn't
know if this was included in the 30 % tree loss. She noted that they have had
some significant tree loss already.
Schlampp noted that this is a Class 8 wetland and it naturally goes up and down
by nature. There is no way of controlling it except by a pumping station, which
Hustad is going to put in to maintain the level.
9
-sT.A.* 8
Minutes
Planning Commission
February 27, 1995
Sandstad commented that the Guide Plan Change is reasonable and has no
difficulty with it. He noted that since they have met the tree loss requirement,
it would be difficult for anyone to oppose it. He supports the project.
Foote asked if there was an'y chance that the storm sewer station would be
moved. Simenstad replied that it has been moved and indicated where on the
map.
Foote noted that he supports the project. He also noted that he does not like to
see trees cut down even though these trees are not considered significant.
Schlampp commented that he supports the project.
Clinton asked if they have considered moving the last unit, which was discussed
this evening. Simenstad replied that they did on a previous plan several years
ago, but explained why the plan would not work.
Kardell asked if there was a conservancy easement. Franzen replied that Staff
has recommended it in the Staff Report.
Sandstad suggested a visual indicator to determine where the conservancy
easement is.
Kardell noted that she has likes the plans and supports the project.
Jerry Lori noted that putting in a conservancy easement around the pond will
prevent them from using an aerator in there to keep the water blue or to get rid
of the scum.
Franzen commented that if the DNR allows them to do it, it is probably a
financial issue.
.
Paul Kober~ noted that he spoke with the DNR about aerating the pond and told
them of the concerns about the algae in the water. The DNR told him that the
presence of duckweed is a good sign. To aerate the water provides grounds for
mosquito breeding. They would not disallow it if it comes down to the issue of
applying for a permit to aerate it, but then it's a financial issue.
10
-rr.A..-9
Minutes
Planning Commission
February 27, 1995
Franzen noted that aerating affects the oxygen levels, not the water quality.
MOTION 1: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 5-0-0.
MOTION 2: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request of Hustad Development Corporation for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium
Density Residential on 1.69 acres, PUD Concept Review on 210 acres, Planned
Unit Development District Review on 12.88 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-
6.5 on 12.88 acres and Preliminary Plat of 12.88 acres into 23 lots based on
plans dated February 24, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff
Report dated February 24, 1995, and under Staff recommendation #4 add that the
conservancy easement will be visually indicated on each rear lot corner with 36
inch posts with the appropriate color. Motion carried 5-0-0.
11
-sr. A. -lD
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT!
FEE OWNER:
WCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
February 24, 1995
Bluffs East 16th
Hustad Development Corporation-Halverson
Normandy Crest and Franlo Road
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 1.69 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 210 acres.
3. Planned Unit Development District Review on 12.88 acres.
4. Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.S on 12.88
acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 12.88 acres into 22 twinhome lots.
1
-rr.A..-\\
A'lkttMetJ
A
l
"', r \
,.-t , ,
,--,"
>-
....
,., , ,
I ,
I
, , . ,
u ... _--..........
Stafr Report
Bluffs East 16th
February 24, 1995
BACKGROUND
Attachment A indicates that this site consists of two parcels owned by different individuals.
Parcel #1 is owned by Hustad Development and is part of the 1986 Bluff Country PUD. This
site is currently guided Medium Density for up to 10 units per acre. The PUD approval
restricted the density to a base of 5 units per acre with additional density possible depending
upon the architectural treatment and impact on existing trees on the property.
Parcel #2 is owned by Kate Halverson and is currently guided Low Density Residential.
There are 5 issues with this development request, including;
• A Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential for parcel #2, (1.69 acres).
• Density transition and compatibility with surrounding, existing uses.
• Impact on trees.
• Architectural compatibility with the existing PUD and surrounding area.
• Storm water qUality.
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Parcel #2 is triangular in shape and is situated between property which is guided Office on the
east side of the service road and property which is guided Low Density Residential (2 units per
acre) on the west side of Franlo Road. This site can be considered as a transitional site between
higher intensity uses along County Road 18 and lower intensity uses to the west. The density
of this site is 3.55 units per-acre. A lower density multiple family site consistent with the twin
homes already built in the neighborhood would be an appropriate use in this location.
TRANSITION AND COMPATIBILITY OF DENSITIES WITH THE SURROUNDING
AREA
The Planned Unit Development approval for Parcel #1 was for a minimum of 56 housing units.
Within this portion of this project, a total of 17 units are proposed.
-sr. A.-13
Stafr Report
Bluffs East 16th
February 24, 1995
The gross density of the project (parcels #1 and #2) including the outlot for the pond is 1.71
units per acre. The net density is 3.39 units per acre. The twinhome development off Fawns
Way (west of site) is 3.75 units per acre and.the twinhome project off Falcons Court to the south
is 3.6 units per acre. The density of this project on a net basis is consistent with the surrounding
area.
IMPACT ON THE SITE'S NATURAL FEATURES
There are a total of 694 total caliper inches of significant trees, greater than 12 inches in
diameter on site. The majority of these trees are oak, with some cottonwood. The fIrst plan
submitted for staff review was a 50 % tree loss. Based upon comments from the City staff and
the neighborhood, the Developer removed one lot and was able to reduce tree loss to 32 %. The
average tree loss for residential projects in Eden Prairie is 30 %. Tree loss approved for a
twinhome development off Fawns Way is 35 % and tree loss approved for the twinhome
development off Falcons Court to the south is 33 %. Tree loss is consistent with tree loss
approved for the area.
A 32 % tree loss represents 222 inches of trees lost due to construction or construction practices.
Tree replacement would be 94 caliper inches. The staff would recommend that the replacement
trees be located in the areas where trees are removed. This would be along the Frontage Road,
south of Building 22, and in the front yard on Parcel 2.
Residents to the south are concerned about the removal of natural vegetation due to building
construction (units 20, 21, 22) and construction of storm sewer.
Four significant trees greater than 12 inches are lost and approximately 112 acre of understory
vegetation of smaller oak trees and shrubs. Moving construction to the north would save this
vegetation, but would impact more signifIcant trees greater than 12 inches in diameter. Since
the tree ordinance is based on trees greater than 12 inches, staff would not suggest moving the
buildings. Removing additional units will save more vegetation (not required by ordinance), but
would further reduce the net density which is currently less than the surrounding area.
More of the non-significant vegetation can be retained by trying to fInd an alternative location
for storm sewer (acceptable to City Engineer).
PUD REQUIREMENTS
As part of the Planned Unit Development approval for the Bluff Country PUD, there was a
specifIc architectural style approved for the twinhome buildings. This included the general
design of the building, exterior materials, and colors. The proposed twinhomes will be
Stafr Report
Bluffs East 16th
February 24, 1995
constructed out of stucco and cedar shake shingles with a similar design to the existing twinhome
buildings in the area.
STORM WATER OUALITY
Prior to 1990, storm water could be discharged into wetland areas without pretreatment. The
storm sewer pipes on the western portion of the project were built in 1988. The future existing
storm sewer pipe which drains portions of service road is exempt from pretreatment
requirements by State Law. The City has a requirement for pretreatment of storm water. On
sites similar to this with small amounts of contributory hard surface water runoff, the City has
permitted as an alternative, an equivalent contribution to the City storm water utility fund which
can be used for maintenance of other existing pretreatment ponds or to acquire other property
for larger and more beneficial pretreatment ponds elsewhere in the community. It is possible
to construct a pond on the property, but would require the loss of additional units or disturb
trees or vegetation near the pond. Since most of the storm water entering the pond site is not
being pretreated, it is questionable how much impact a pretreatment pond would have water
qUality.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 12.8 acres into 22 twinhome lots at a gross
density of 1.71 units per acre and a net density of 3.39 units per acre. r.he RM-6.5 zoning
district would allow up to 6.7 units per acre. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum square
footage and setback requirements for the RM-6.5 zoning district. The lot sizes are consistent
with the twinhome developments to the east and south of the project.
GRADING
This site is situated on the slope on the north and east sides of an existing wetland. The use of
full walkouts helps minimize grading in the amount of encroachment towards the pond. Tree
loss is calculated at 32 % wl:tich is consistent with the surrounding area.
There are two 5 foot high retaining walls proposed to be constructed along the frontage road.
These retaining walls will require a building permit and certification by a structural engineer.
The building code will require that a fence be constructed along the top of the retaining wall
because of the proximity of the bike trail.
Erosion control during construction will be extremely important. The developer will be bound
by the requirements of the City and Watershed District for installation of hay bales and silt
fencing to protect soil from going into the wetland during erosion.
Staff Report
Bluffs East 16th
February 24, 1995
BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
Building architecture is consistent with the PUD. There are no exterior material requirements
in the RM-6.5 Zoning District.
UTILITIES
Sewer and water service is immediately available adjacent to the site.
There is an existing DNR wetland in the center portion of the property. Currently this pond has
no natural outlet. There are three inlet pipes into this area, draining approximately 80 acres of
residential and park area to the west, from County Road 18, and the service road. As part of
the project, the Developer will be required to install a storm sewer lift station which will
maintain a water level for the pond. This water level will be established by the Department of
Natural Resources. Maintaining a maximum water level will help preserve existing natural
vegetation around the pond.
FIRE CODE REOUIREMENTS
The Fire Marshal is recommending that either a turn-around be provided on the two long
driveways off the service road or that the buildings be sprinkled.
LANDSCAPING
The amount of landscaping required is based upon the tree replacement requirement of 94 inches
and the caliper inch requirement according to building square footage of 75 caliper inches. The
landscape plan meets this requirement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff presents the following alternatives to the Planning Commission:
I. If Commission believes there are compelling reasons to change the Comprehensive Guide
Plan and that density and environmental impacts are minimal and mitigated, then one
option would be to recommend approval based on the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for
review by the Watershed District.
Y.A..-\(b
Staff Report
Bluffs East 16th
February 24, 1995
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for
review by the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Permit issu~nce, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fIre code requirements.
3. Prior to Grading Permit issuance, the proponent shall be required to stake the
proposed construction limits with fencing. Fencing must be installed 48 hours
prior to grading and receive approval by the City Engineer and the City Forester
prior to the commencement of tree cutting.
4. A conservancy easement shall be required over all of the steep slopes outside of
the grading limits proposed within this project to protect slopes, existing trees,
and edge vegetation around the pond. A conservancy easement will allow no
physical alteration of the property.
5. Extend the bike trail along the east side of Franlo Road.
II. If the Planning Commission believes that compelling reasons for changing the Guide Plan
have not been provided and that density and environmental impacts are high, then one
option would be to continue the item and direct the proponent to lower site density and
preserve more vegetation.
The staff recommends Alternative one.
1L.~.-\7
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Stuart A. FOx~nager of Parks and Natural Resources
February 28, 1995
Supplement Staff Report to the February 24, 1995 Community Development Staff
Report for Bluffs East 16th
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff feels that this project has merit as it is proposed; however, there are several
considerations that the commission must weight before deciding what action they would
recommend on this project.
BACKGROUND:
This site is 12.88 acres located in the southeastern corner of Eden Prairie adjacent to Franlo
Road and the frontage road for the upgrading of County Road 18. The parcel contains land
owned by two different individuals. The largest parcel is owned by Hustad Development and
the second parcel is owned by Kate Halverson. The plan involves development of the parcel
into multi-family units. The parcel is partly an extension of the 1986 Bluff Country PUD.
Under that proposal, the site is currently guided as medium density up to 10 units per acre. As
noted in the Community Development Staff Report, there are five issues that need to be looked
at in this proposal. The staff will highlight the areas which the commissioners normally review
and give additional background above and beyond the other staff report.
ISSUES:
Tree Preservation
There is a total of 46 significant trees on this site that have diameters greater than 12". This
results in 694 total caliper inches of significant trees. Most of the trees on the site are red oak
with a scattering of cottonwood.
The first plan submitted to the staff indicated that approximately 50 % of the trees would be lost
to construction. Because of comments by the City staff and the neighborhood to the south and
west, the developer removed one lot and changed the building pad locations and was able to
reduce the tree loss to 32 % . This compares favorably with the "average loss" in residential
projects within the City of nearly 30 %. The staff would like to point out the tree loss for the
twin home development to the west off Fawns Way was 35 % and the tree loss for the twin home
development off Falcons Way to the south was 33 %. This would mean that a 32 % loss would
be consistent with the tree loss for the immediate adjacent areas.
In addition to the significant trees on this site, there is a large amount of undergrowth consisting
of honeysuckle shrubs and regeneration growth of red oak trees that range from 1" to 4" in
diameter. As a result of this regeneration growth and other vegetation, the site when viewed
. appears to have a very dense consistency of woodlands.
Residents to the south stated that they are concerned about the removal of the natural vegetation
adjacent to their homes for the construction of a building, as well as storm sewer force main.
The reality of the situation is that shifting buildings back to the north would save this buffer zone
along the existing twin homes, but would significantly increase the number of large mature trees
that would be removed from the site. Looking at the site plan, there are trade-offs to each type
of configuration and these options must be kept in mind when reviewing this project.
The staff would recommend that any vegetation outside the immediate building pads on the
downhill slope and the remaining balance of the project would be placed into a conservancy type
agreement.
Grading
The site would be graded on the slopes on the north and east sides of an existing wetland. The
project calls for the use of full basement walkouts, which would minimize the amount of
grading; however, there are a couple of issues that need to be looked at carefully with this type
of project.
The construction of retaining walls that need to be placed along the frontage road would have
to be engineered to meet City building codes.
Erosion control during the construction phase of this project will be extremely important. The
requirements of the City and Watershed District for installation of silt fence and other erosion
control measures will be necessary to protect soil from being eroded into the wetland area.
Currently, there is an erosion fence on the upper slopes of this parcel of land that is being used
for the ramp/frontage road construction for County Road 18.
WETLAND IMPACT AND STORM WATER TREATMENT:
The proponent is required to follow all Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District regulations
and they will need to submit a detailed plan to the City Engineer prior to final plat approval.
There is an existing DNR wetland in the center of the property and this pond currently has no
outlet. The current area serves approximately 80 aces of residential and parkland and as part
of the development, the proponent would be required to install a storm sewer lift station that
would establish a high water point for this storm water facility. The high water level point
-rr.A. -1'1
would be established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
In addition, the location of the force main needed to pump the water out of this basin is a subject
to be reviewed by the staff and City Council. The location for this main will determine whether
trees are removed to install it, or if it can be relocated to a different part of the project that
would have less impact on existing vegetation. Future access to the pump location will be
needed since the City will be responsible for maintenance.
SIDEWALK/BIKE TRAIL INSTALLATION:
As part of the development, the existing bike trail that is along the east side of Franlo Road
would be continued up to the corner of Normandy Crest and the County Road 18 frontage road.
The county upgrade plans include a sidewalk/trail along the west side of the frontage road,
which would run between Normandy Crest and Falcons Way/Bluff Road area to the south.
RECOMMENDATION:
This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 27, 1995 and was
approved on a 7-0 vote. The staff would recommend approval of the project as outlined in
alternative one of the City Planner's staff report.
Buffs/Stuart
Y. A. -2.0
goes into the NURP pond. Through the process of holding it, the solids
settle out of it. This particular NURP pond is no different than any other
one. The size of this pond would be as deep as 10 to 12 feet before it
falls out, and is calculated to take care of the entire site plus the adjacent
site.
Koenig asked if most of the trees are going to come out where the pond
is going in. Fox replied that the trees are scattered throughout this site.
Hilgeman questioned whether or not there has to be screening from the
NURP pond by Pioneer Trail. Fox replied that there does not have to be
screening.
Koenig expressed concern about the tree replacement calculations. Fox
noted that the amended plan is to save trees #10, #11, #12, and #7. He
was out last week and has not had a chance to recalculate it. Simonsted
commented that they are figuring on 27% tree loss, and are going to try
to save tree #7.
MOTION: Jacobson moved to accept Staff's recommendations for the
American Lutheran Church 2nd Addition. Kube-Harderwijk seconded the
motion and it passed 5-0-0.
D. Bluffs East 16th
Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated February 28, 1995, from
Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources, and a Staff
Report, dated February 24, 1995, from Michael D. Franzen, City
Planner.
Fox reviewed the project with the Commission. He noted that this project
has been looked at by the Staff and neighbors, and there have been a
number of compromises such as the building face materials. The original
tree loss calculation was 50 %, but with the recommendation by Staff to
remove one lot and to change one of the building pad locations, the tree
loss dropped down to 32 %. C
Staff noted that there is a large amount of undergrowth consisting of
honeysuckle shrubs and regeneration growth of red oak trees. As a result
of this regeneration growth and other vegetation, the site when viewed
appears to have a very dense consistency of woodlands. Residents to the
south stated that they are concerned about the removal of the natural
vegetation adjacent to their homes for the construction of a building, as
well as storm sewer force main.
Neighbors are concerned about the roadway proposed to service the pond
on this site. The Engineering Department is recommending this pond
5
-rr. A. -2.1
have an exit point, and the only way to do it is pump it up and out into
the existing storm sewer along Frontage Road. There is a lot of grading
and retaining walls and these will be reviewed by the Building
Department, and the builders must meet City standards.
Storm water treatment might be a need for a secondary NURP pond. The
decision has been made that the existing pond would indeed serve as the
NURP pond for the entire area, and there would not be a need for a new
pond.
Simonsted reviewed her development proposal with the Commission. She
noted that they have agreed with the neighbors to plant 18 12-16 foot
conifer trees along the southwest corner of the property line of this
project. They have cut their tree loss down to 32 %. The project
compares consistent with the two surrounding projects, Bluffs East 6th and
7th Addition. The architecture, the size of the building, and the materials
are similar, if not the same, as the ones in the Bluffs 7th Addition project.
Jacobson asked where the pumping station would be. Fox replied that the
pumping station would come off the south easterly corner. He noted that
the drawings that the Commission has are not the current ones. At the
Planning Commission meeting on February 13th, changes were made and
the recommendation was to put a three unit building there instead of two
twin units. As a result of this change, there is a significant amount of
trees being saved. The pumping station was put at the very south end
because the elevations are more favorable for maintenance.
Koening expressed concern about what erosion control measures will be
used on the steep slopes. Simonsted noted that the City is going to direct
them as to their requirements.
Koenig recommended using hay bales. Fox commented that the
recommendation must come from the Purgatory Creek Watershed District.
Kube-Harderwijk asked if the City or the Homeowners Association is
going to own the outlot. Simonsted replied that she believes the City will
eventually own it. The pumping will be installed and paid for by the
developer, and it is typical practice that the City maintains the pump.
Kube-Harderwijk asked if there should be any sort of conservancy
easement on this if it isn't owned by the City. Lambert replied that he
recommends that there be a conservancy easement on this outlot whether
or not the City owns it.
Brown expressed concern about the density being very high. Lambert
noted that the guide plan allows this. He said that this is not the highest
density that it would be at that point.
6
-rr. A. -2.2"
VI.
Hilgeman expressed concern about the tree replacement is not the same
as the significant trees that were taken down. Simonsted noted that they
have planted ash, sugar maple, Norway maple and pine oaks because they
have to think about the soils and what grows the best. She also noted that
what survives in these soils are sugar sand.
Hilgeman commented that since red oaks and cotton woods were growing
for a long time, the soils would be fine with it. Simonsted noted that
cotton wood has not been a tree that people typically want in their yards.
Fox noted that in all the parks they always plant a diversity of trees to
keep a healthy mix of trees for disease and insect concerns. This also
adds more color to the landscape.
MOTION: Kube-Harderwijk moved to approve the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated February 28, 1995, with a conservancy easement
on outlot A, and any other areas within the lots that are deemed savable
and reasonable, and as much erosion control as reasonable per
conservancy easement planting for it. Brown seconded the motion and it
passed 5-0-0.
OLD BUSINESS
A. None.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Recommendation to Name Newly Acguired Conservation Sites
Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated February 27, 1995, from
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities.
Lambert noted that the City has acquired all or part of three new
conservancy sites, and the City is making new maps. Staff would
recommend naming the site acquired from the Klein family and Darril
Peterson as, the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area. All of the
features of this site were extremely precious to Dick Anderson, and this
was a project that he strongly endorsed. Staff believes that Dick
Anderson established such a continuous and consistent effort to protect
Eden Prairie's resources that naming a conservation area in his honor
would be a very good precedent.
Staff would also recommend naming the land acquired from Kathy Trost
and from Peter George in the near future, the Riley Creek Woods
Conservation Area. They would also recommend naming the 55 acres
native prairie and oak savannah site acquired from Lynn Charlson, the
Prairie Bluff Conservation. These two sites would be named after their
7
-sLA,-23
February 23, 1995
Mr. Michael D. Franzen
Senior Planer
BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Community Development Department
City Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
Dear Mr. Franzen:
Subsequent to my letter of February 9th, and our meeting at your office, Wooddale
Builders has presented our association with a secondary plan for their development of the
Bluffs East 16th addition immediately to the North of our Bluffs East 7th addition.
We as a group have no problem with the plan to build 17 of the proposed 23 units as
originally presented by Hustad and the builder. We do have a strong concern with the
destruction of approximately 61,000 square feet of nature woodland to build three two
unit townhomes on lots 18 thru 23.
,
On February 22nd, Wooddale presented a revised plan to our group (See attachment
"A"). In this plan a two-home and three-home unit would be built replacing the three
two-home units in the original plan. These units would be spaced to allow some trees and
woodland to remain, but there would still be a significant tree loss to build the three-home
unit. Wooddale has proposed a coniferous tree screen between our existing homes and
the proposed three-home units. This is unsatisfactory to the owners of these units who
paid a lot premium because these woods were to be left in their present natural state.
We propose a compromise:
1) Wooddale would build 19 units including the two-home unit shown on the
attachment. We were originally told only 13 units would'be built in the 16th
addition.
2) The planning commission would declare the present wooded area as an unbuildable
site. It is, at best, an expensive site to build on because of the 35% slope to the
rear and the necessity of building a 20 foot high retaining wall immediately in front
of the these three homes plus another retaining wall to protect the trees to be
saved North of the proposed three unit home.
Y.A..· ZL\
3) The woods would be preserved in their present state supplying much needed
oxygen to combat the substantial increase in Co, Co2, NOX and carbon
particulates that are certain to be created by a 200 to 300% increase in traffic
on the new Highway 18 later to become US Route 169.
It's not good planning to tear down 50 years of tree growth and replace it with 180 days
of home construction, especially in an area that has already been hit by a substantial tree
loss due to the very necessary construction of a new bridge and a wider, safer highway.
We hope our compromise is satisfactory to the planning commission as well as the
developers.
Very truly yours on behalf of the 25 taxpaying
owners in the Bluffs East 7th Addition.
Enc!.
-rr,A. -z5'
•
I
\
\
\
\)'
C)'
,;2'
~
lJ
en •
/
----------I~J
• 0\
• ....
C)'
• -
• -I>.. •
~
I\J . ....
lo
•
C)
.;0 \
.~
ct, \
\
t
\
~
~
\
\
\
\
~ ."
" "
" \ ' ~-~-
\
; --------;----
~--~---'-~ "
I, -rIo A. -2~ ~/'. \ \
'.JJ "J •
•
I
BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
VJ'::',ctf ~ GJ-.J1//Ve Jh.::,.:;d;;
(.\:r "";= STAre-F"oJ( W-'Nret(
/YJr/J1/~"v ft-"iT21
(i '-' r 6 r-sr.1re:-OX V'r1..; 14 '/G-\.'
/114r?sItA~ I1N./JcdJ'o/V
OuT of ?Ow
w;A, .. -2.7
9.5"7"
9S7d.-
'9S 7S
9S/2
BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
South for the Winter Loren Sewall
-....-A 11 1 J" . u:b:-t" ~ -7 ; . I .'~~ , .-" , '} . /' .~ '/ I / ,f"0(..(,.1 tV V·,, 'Uu.....-I
South for the Winter Verna Melieus
South for the Hinter Leona Nelson
, \ \
\
BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
-sl.A. -Zq
------------------
February 9, 1995
Mr. Michael D. Franzen
Senior Planner
BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Community Development Department
City Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
Dear Mr. Franzen:
We are a group of25 upscale townhouse owners living on Falcons Way in southeastern
Eden Prairie. Our homes are immediately North of Bluff Road. (See attachment "A" for
location).
Our president, Mr. Roger Perkins, has talked to you expressing our concern over
proposed future development of the Bluffs East 16th addition; an area which is
immediately North of our homes. .
Specifically, we are concerned with the wholesale destruction of a dense woods which is
the proposed site oflots 18 thru 23 (See attachment "B"). These lots are immediately
adjacent to our lots 12 thru 15 upon which homes have been built and landscaped.
The purchasers of the homes on our lots 12 thru 15 were specifically told by Wooddale
Builders that these woods would not be destroyed. In fact, they paid a premium for the
woods at the perimeter of their lots. Owners on lot 13 substantially altered the floorplan
of their house to take advantage of the wooded view and would not have done so if they
knew the trees would be destroyed.
.
Such destruction would substantially lower the resale property values of our units as well
as remove 25 trees with trunk diameters ranging from 12 to 27 inches (see attachment "c"
for tree inventory). It is our understanding that some of these trees would be replaced
with similar trees with a trunk diameter of only 3 inches. We are also concerned with the
effects of these removals on soil classified as HuE, Hubbard Sandy Loam, on an 18 to
35% slope. Substantial rains during the construction period would cause great havoc
regardless of how straw, seed, mulch or fiber blankets are used. Silt fences on sandy
hillsides are notoriously ineffective.
V.A.-30
Another concern we have with the proposed project is the exterior finishing materials.
Wooddale has told us these homes would be constructed with brick trim, stucco exteriors
and shake roofs matching the 25 homes in our section, as well as, the 25 townhomes on
Fawns Way. However, attachment "D", a photocopy of sheet number 5 of the plans show
a lower cost exterior of 4" aluminum siding with aluminum soffits and a class "B" asphalt
shingle roof I realize these plans aren't final and perhaps there's an error in this regard.
We were led to believe that Hustad wanted shake roofs throughout the Bluffs
development.
The construction of the 17 townhomes north of the pond drain line looks like a viable plan
if the homes have stucco exteriors with shake roofs as promised.
However, building the six units in question would needlessly destroy one of the few decent
groves of trees in the area. Because of the grade variant between the fronts of these six
units and the level of the frontage road above these buildings, we don't feel they will be
particularly desirable homesites.
We're talking about approximately 61,000 sq ft of woodland that doesn't need to be
destroyed for the sake of a few more homes, especially when it was promised those woods
would be left standing.
We will attend the planning meeting and hope you support our request.
JL:kk
Very truly yours,
~~ Ll:s~rer
9684 Falcons Way
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
941-2458
888-7112
~A.· 31
'.,
~~:
.. _-J
-~ -o.
f
... --. .. ~...,
-O-W:\-~ "'-.:. • .... ."" ...... '
(:--.~<.--.1 • c, ...... • ~. ' ••
....... Nt: .. " -. .,..... . ..., ...... . '10,,'" ..... , \ . \ \ -
LOCATION MAP .•..
", ",
-:sr. A. -3'L
",\
:::1:
C J
:J:
~ .. ' ,
·t6·~
,: I~
... ,:~ ~-
.. 1-\ ,
» i" :: ,~
:1f .'
" .,"' --I
;,.
t'"!.; ..
:z: o o
• (J1 -:-" Ln."
c:::o ru
~
rn
IS"
/
58.00
58.00
w 58.00 w
'-.I
'-.I 0" ru !"
."
,~~ .. ,
." .......
(J1
0
.bo
P
IV
(J1
58. 00
58.00
14
,~ r-A , -I I I ,-,-
:::' L-. " 8 l_ ,_, 1-: r
·u j~
NS9· 45' 01 n \
: 170:Jl0 ______ -, r - -I
I 1"'\ , I~
'v l!::i
I lu I
I I
I 170.00 I
I
I I.
I\.) I~
I I\.) I~
I I
I J L _1~. Q9 _____ _
---------1
I I~ 5 I 1"'\, ~
II..J I~ ......
I '-. 1 ~
I 170.00 1 ~
1 I rn
I 1 w
I I~ ~
I I\.) I'" ~ I C) ,0
1 J L _I~. Q9 _____ _
I
I
I
I
---------,
I."
'-. 1:-"
lO I~
170.00
~\ -D.
I
~\
.;:., ---
-;,..,)" -36"E£~aH c:> ----00 '51 • to, ____ \ -----\---\
\ \
!l.A.~ '33
I'll! III
;~I
III Ii 111
Illllil Ilf
1111
(!)
Z
0
-.J
::J
CD
~
Z
::J
I
(Y)
'·"1""
.. ~I II)
/JT~/r~~,,->-
" tC. I) t..
;:) ~
~ en rOo
.~-"'~. XC\! --~ 1D"It .------IDIt'I
-..--~-01 t..1t'I -e: u. m
-c+'
!tI t. OOOl
CI) +' ,"ID
CI) DlCI)C\! ,
I
e: e: CO,
II c;, ii=ch ~ OXID o ID I -, -.
I I IDC,....
OC\!
+'+'-01 It) CNO c: 10 C...-
-W-e: SCI) e: -OC
/Q 000 ··1IiiIi -C\!-.c >-. Cl.. 0l1D0-
ID
0
W
0: -<
0-
W
0:
0-
<-
en
TREE INVENTORY -BLUFFS EAST 16TH ADO. JAN. 16, 1995 :z
0 -IN OESC. REF • IN DESC. I-<:
13.1 OAK 25 12 OAK :>-a.: lJJ 24/ COTTON'ltOOD 26,/ 16 OAK ......I a:
24'/ COTTON'ltOOD 27/ ' 12 OAK lJJ a :z u "It 161 COTTON'ltOOD 26 12 COTTONWOOD 0 C,!) "It 12/ OAK 29 12 COTTONWOOD -:z l-I-(T)
22/ OAK 30 12 COTTON'ltOOD I--:z W 1t'I(T) -0 lJ.J W It'IaJ 161 OAK 31 12 COTTON'ltOOD CI ......I % 0: (T)
131 OAK 32 12 OAK CI -0.. I-Z"It en 2:1 14/ OAK 33 12 CHERRY <: ::::;, 0 ...
12/ CD ......I :I: • "It OAK 34 15 ASH :I: -lJ.J I-wo! 16/ OAK 35 IB ASH I-CJ) >-aJ -,-..
24/ OAK 36 12 OAK to :z lJ.J ..... _O:C\I -CI 0 0--13/ OAK 37 12 ASH -.-<t1D
12/ OAK 3B 14 ASH l-I-0 :s: 0: ......
0. 12.1 OAK 39 12 ASH en -<: ow w <: 0 I-Ol-ZZ 14/ OAK 40 20 ASH lJ.J :z en o-wo 16/ OAK 41 24 COTTON'ltOOO 0 :::J -::;)O:I:
12~ OAK 42 20 COTTONHOOD CJ) u :I: -enwo.
I.J.. 12 OAK 43 10 CEDAR I.J.. lJ.J 12/ OAK 44 10 CEDAR ::::;, l-ii 12~ OAK 45 24 COTTON'ltOOO ......I -0
14 OAK 46 30 COTTON'ltOOO co U') u.
121 OAK •••••••••• as •••••••••••••••••• 0
12 OAK 594 TOTAL CAL. INCH w
Ui 0: -<
00 DENOTES TREES .J 0.
/ -:1)y fJ I c,lrrUS
I-UJ 1?,e,.;>:;, /~ ViS;V!'''',) rll';'''A LOST TO GRAD ING -0:
Z~ .... 0--DRAWN CHECKED DESIGN
ctt fl.t ctt
50 0 50 100 150 SHEET NUMBER -te-Mwd , ! I
SCALE IN FEET 5
SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET
-DATE: JANUARY 23, 1995 I
DATE
1-23-95
--sr. A. -35
I
. ',~ '. ~ " ",1'.' ,".
: \ ';; .~~
-:',;;"
• ,'I',,"
" . '-\ ';.' ,' . ",
.. ~.,
City of Eden Prairie
City Offices
8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
Phone (612) 949-8300 • TDD (612) 949-8399 • Fax (612) 949-8390
February 8, 1995
Terry R. Jacobson
10435 Fawns Way
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
SUBJECT: Bluffs East 16th Addition
Dear Mr. Jacobson:
I would like to take this opportunity to provide preliminary information on the points of your
letter of February 2, 1995. A complete analysis and formulation of recommendations on the
project by the City will be done prior to the Planning Commission meeting on February 27th.
I am simply including information and responses at this time.
Point #1: Environmentallmpact
The Developer will be required to obtain permits from the Department of Natural Resources to
remove accumulation of silt in the southwest corner of the pond. In addition, the City is
requiring the Developer to install a pumping station so that the water level can be maintained
at a level to be determined by the Department of Natural Resources. This will help save
vegetation around the edge of the pond.
The City's Tree Ordinance requires that the location of trees 12" in diameter and larger be
shown on the development plan. Trees that are lost due to construction must be replaced on an
escalating scale; the higher percentage of trees removed, the higher percentage requirement for
replacement. The City calculates tree loss by including trees that are physically cut down due
to houses, streets, utility line construction, site grading, and trees that are expected to be lost
over time due to construction practices. Although we have not completed a final analysis, our
estimate for tree loss is 50 %. This is above the average for a residential subdivision. City staff
will work with the developer to reduce tree loss.
Point #2: Erosion of Property Values
Any type of development has potential for impact on values of the surrounding neighborhood.
While impact on property values is taken into consideration when projects are reviewed, it is not
by itself a reason to approve or deny a project. Developing the property consistent with the
Comprehensive Guide Plan and City code helps minimize impact on property values.
Recycled Paper y. A.-3b
Mr. Terry Jacobson
February 8, 1995
Page 2
Point #3: Unethical Developer
In 1986, Hustad Development presented a Planned Unit Development to the City covering 210
acres which included the vacant property on the east and north side of the pond. At that time,
the Developer requested a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change to Medium Density Residential
to build up to 10 units per acre on 11.19 acres, or 110 housing units. The City Council
approved the Guide Plan Change to Medium Density, but placed a density restriction of 5 units
per acre (55 units) with additional units possible, based upon the design of the buildings, the
impact on the pond and trees. The current proposal for this 11.19 piece is 1.79 units per acre
or 19 units. The net density (excluding slopes and the pond) is 3.55 units per acre. The
twinhome development off Fawns Way is 3.75 units per acre and the development off Falcons
Court is 3.6 units per acre.
There is a 1.69 acre piece of land to the north of this property which is being added to this
proposal. That property is guided Low Density Residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. Hustad
Development is requesting a change in the land use to Medium Density Residential for
twinhomes.
The current Guide Plan for both of these parcels would preclude apartment buildings and
commercial uses. The northwest corner of the intersection of County Road 1.-8 and Pioneer Trail
is guided Commercial and Medium Density housing. That property coulu be an appropriate
location for a Byerly's store, other commercial uses, or apartments.
Sincerely yours,
Michael D. Franzen
City Planner
m:\Jacobson
-X.A. -37
Terry R. Jacobson
February 2, 1995
Mike Franzen
City Of Eden Prairie
Community & Economic Development
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, IvIN. 553"44
Dear Mr. Franzen:
10435 Fawns Way Eden Prairie, MN 55347
The purpose of this correspondence is to express my concern and total disagreement with
the proposed development ofland adjacent to County #18 and south of Pioneer Trail. We
live on Fawns Way on the southwest side of the pond that is located there. There are
three reasons for my opposition: '
1. Environmental Impact -This pond serves several purposes bedsides being
attractive and a wildlife habitat. Current development has started to ruin the pond and
surrounding area by allowing a'larg'e accumidation of silt t()fill the:southweStcorner of the
pond. This in tum has contributed to the rise in the water level that has killed several
surrounding trees. According to the developer, he is having thirty dead trees removed.
Additional development on the East side will aggravate this and calls for the removal of
many mature trees that will be replaced with saplings. The proposed development will
destroy the pond and will place several homes too close to the pond and too close to
County #18.
2. Erosion of Property Values -Obviously this development will hurt all
homeowners that are on the pond and also the adjoining neighborhood. All such property
will be worth much less and as a result we would expect our tax valuations to reduce
accordingly. Eden Prairie would gain more new houses to offset the expected tax relief,
but it would be a costly to appease current homeowners. We wourd not expect to pay the
same taxes if our property values drop because we have to look at another house instead
of a pond. These new houses would be smaller and less valuable because their front steps
would be on #18; as a result the neighborhood would decline in appearance and value
and as a result, the tax basis ~O\.ild be expected to go down.· "
Y.A." 3S
Terry R. Jacobson 10435 Fawns Way Eden Prairie, MN 55347
3. Unethical Developer -Three other homeowners have publicly stated that the developer
promised that there would not be any development on the east side of the pond. His
remarks were the reason that we paid a premium to buy on the pond. He said, "the city
and other agencies would never let anyone do the damage required to build over there".
At a recent meeting to discuss the same, he-and a representative from Hustad said that the
property has always been zoned for higher density housing; in effect., if we didn't like this
proposal we might be faced with apartments rather than double homes. He also stated that
"the new Byerly's going in" might also bring other commercial development to the comer
if we did not readily accept his propos~. We are all feeling betrayed by the Hustad
development people and their selected builder. We were lied to and do not believe any
claims that are now being made about maintaining the integrity and appearance of this
area.
I do not believe that Eden Prairie would allow the land massacre that would have to occur
to allow a commercial/apartment development and its required acres of parking to occur in
such a beautiful wildlife area. If it did believe such was possible, I, for one of many,
would bring this to a higher level of contest.
Please help us to preserve some semblance of beauty and nature in this area and stop
trying to fill in the pond to pave the entire neighborhood.
Z;Y'~~Clk-
Terry R. Jacobson
cc: Barb & Gordie Taft .
John Olson
Department of Natural Resources
V.A. -39
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities
FROM: Stuart A. FOx~nager of Parks and Natural Resources
DATE: February 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Supplement Staff Report to the February 24, 1995 Community Development Staff
Report for Bluffs East 16th
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff feels that this project has merit as it is proposed; however, there are several
considerations that the commission must weight before deciding what action they would
recommend on this project.
BACKGROUND:
This site is 12.88 acres located in the southeastern corner of Eden Prairie adjacent to Franlo
Road and the frontage road for the upgrading of County Road 18. The parcel contains land
owned by two different individuals. The largest parcel is owned by Hustad Development and
the second parcel is owned by Kate Halverson. The plan involves development of the parcel
into multi-family units. The parcel is partly an extension of the 1986 Bluff Country PUD.
Under that proposal, the site is currently guided as medium density up to 10 units per acre. As
noted in the Community Development Staff Report, there are five issues that need to be looked
at in this proposal. The staff will highlight the areas which the commissioners normally review
and give additional background above and beyond the other staff report.
ISSUES:
Tree Preservation
There is a total of 46 significant trees on this site that have diameters greater than 12". This
results in 694 total caliper inches of significant trees. Most of the trees on the site are red oak
with a scattering of cottonwood.
The first plan submitted to the staff indicated that approximately 50 % of the trees would be lost
to construction. Because of comments by the City staff and the neighborhood to the south and
west, the developer removed one lot and changed the building pad locations and was able to
reduce the tree loss to 32 %. This compares favorably with the "average loss" in residential
"""
projects within the City of nearly 30 %. The staff would like to point out the tree loss for the
twin home development to the west off Fawns Way was 35 % and the tree loss for the twin home
development off Falcons Way to the south was 33 %. This would mean that a 32 % loss would
be consistent with the tree loss for the immediate adjacent areas.
In addition to the significant trees on this site, there is a large amount of undergrowth consisting
of honeysuckle shrubs and regeneration growth of red oak trees that range from 1" to 4" in
diameter. As a result of this regeneration growth and other vegetation, the site when viewed
appears to have a very dense consistency of woodlands.
Residents to the south stated that they are concerned about the removal of the natural vegetation
adjacent to their homes for the construction of a building, as well as storm sewer force main.
The reality of the situation is that shifting buildings back to the north would save this buffer zone
along the existing twin homes, but would significantly increase the number of large mature trees
that would be removed from the site. Looking at the site plan, there are trade-offs to each type
of configuration and these options must be kept in mind when reviewing this project.
The staff would recommend that any vegetation outside the immediate building pads on the
downhill slope and the remaining balance of the project would be placed into a conservancy type
agreement.
Grading
The site would be graded on the slopes on the north and east sides of an existing wetland. The
project calls for the use of full basement walkouts, which would minimize the amount of
grading; however, there are a couple of issues that need to be looked at carefully with this type
of project.
The construction of retaining walls that need to be placed along the frontage road would have
to be engineered to meet City building codes.
Erosion control during the construction phase of this project will be extremely important. The
requirements of the City and Watershed District for installation of silt fence and other erosion
control measures will be necessary to protect soil from being eroded into the wetland area.
Currently, there is an erosion fence on the upper slopes of this parcel of land that is being used
for the ramp/frontage road construction for County Road 18.
WETLAND IMPACT AND STORM WATER TREATMENT:
The proponent is required to follow all Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District regulations
and they will need to submit a detailed plan to the City Engineer prior to final plat approval.
There is an existing DNR wetland in the center of the property and this pond currently has no
outlet. The current area serves approximately 80 aces of residential and parkland and as part
of the development, the proponent would be required to install a storm sewer lift station that
would establish a high water point for this storm water facility. The high water level point
would be established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
In addition, the location of the force main needed to pump the water out of this basin is a subject
to be reviewed by the staff and City Council. The location for this main will determine whether
trees are removed to install it, or if it can be relocated to a different part of the project that
would have less impact on existing vegetation. Future access to the pump location will be
needed since the City will be responsible for maintenance.
SIDEWALK/BIKE TRAIL INSTALLATION:
As part of the development, the existing bike trail that is along the east side of Franlo Road
would be continued up to the corner of Normandy Crest and the County Road 18 frontage road.
The county upgrade plans include a sidewalk/trail along the west side of the frontage road,
which would run between Normandy Crest and Falcons Way/Bluff Road area to the south.
RECOMMENDATION:
This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 27, 1995 and was
approved on a 7-0 vote. The staff would recommend approval of the project as outlined in
alternative one of the City Planner's staff report.
Buffs/Stuart
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-4-95
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. -:sr. B
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger BOULDER RIDGE
Michael D. Franzen
R nested Council Action: eq
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
• 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres and Zoning District
Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 11.40 acres and PUD District Review on 27.1 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 27.1 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 27.1 acres into 36 lots and 2 outlots.
BACKGROUND:
The Boulder Ridge project was ftrst reviewed by the Planning Commission at the February 27, 1995 meeting.
The Planning Commission voted to continue the project and directed the developer to revise the plan to reduce
site density, save more trees, pretreat storm water, transition to surrounding single family neighborhoods,
provide a safer access, and lessen impacts on the wetland areas.
On March 13, 1995, the developer returned to the Planning Commission with a revised development plan with
three less twinhome units, and larger lot sizes on the western end of the project to be more comparable in lot
sizes to the existing Boulder Ridge neighborhood. This reduced tree loss from 58 % to 21 %. The driveway
access into the townhome project was moved to a better location on Mitchell Road. This provided better site
vision distance and a safer access. A second pretreatment pond was added. Two minor issues raised by the
Planning Commission were drainage and setbacks. The Commission recommended a continuance to the March
27th meeting.
At the March 27, 1995 meeting, the developer presented a revised plan which provides for proper pretreatment
of storm water. All twinhomes meet the required 30 foot setback to Mitchell Road. The Planning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend approval of the project.
SUPPORTING REPORTS:
1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review
2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
3. Staff Report dated March 24, 1995, March 10, 1995, February 10, 1995
4. Correspondence
5. PC Minutes dated February 13, 1995 and March 13, 1995
1T. B. -1
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
BOULDER RIDGE
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT OF BOULDER RIDGE
FOR DENNIS LUNSKI
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Boulder
Ridge PUD Concept by Dennis Lunski and considered their request for approval for
development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on April 4, 1995;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Boulder Ridge, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as
outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans
dated March 24, 1995.
3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission
dated March 27, 1995.
ADOPfED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
Y. B.-2..
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
BOULDER RIDGE
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF BOULDER RIDGE FOR DENNIS LUNSKI
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Boulder Ridge for Dennis Lunski dated March 24, 1995, consisting
of 27.1 acres, a copy of which is on ftle at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with
the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and
is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
y. B.-3
Boulder Ridge
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION"' ..... . i . . .... ,:c"i~,:.'~·~,i.;:ft"::'
THATPART OF NE:'1/4'OF, NCr,/,4 WHICH l:.I£S'SLy,Or,PHEASA.NTOA.KS',;ExeEP71rHAT'};:~'
PART DEse AS BE:G,'AT sweOR'OF NE;',f/.4' 'OF N£".,J/4,:"THN,:O;D£G40"MIN':J6,<.Sf,P':£.'J,:"
ALONG THEW"LIND THOF DIST'70.01·FT'/H 'NB9 DtG:',3g-'MIN.,'2J'$EC t:PAR;~IM'TH.F,,~,:~,·~~:t:~:
s LINE THqF.~ P(s:r. :508.4,6 "FT TH N -58'iDE,G.' 40, MIN 37.-$EC,E·Dlsr",328.~4J."t1/THN:S?i.1i>:~:~
S 47 DEGl t .. :MIN 08 :SEC E Dlsr 'j3"FT TO, ,erR UN£,:OPMITCHEl:CROqH.:;SWL~Yt~~,~;~,:;:~!~:1.;~:
ALONG SA,.ID ,'CTR,"tINEDIST250~8 FT TO,S LINE, THOF~TH' wtY"6Q3.55~,f;r;.rTo:}J.:r);?<~;;':,":'f::';
OF BEG ALSO EXCEPT ROAD, ,,', -') , , . ":': ':,r::;~~;,;::o;;\f:~~:1r~<~t~'~~i
~ ... ~ '-,; -.' :.
TOTAL, AREA 27.16 AC +/-' . .,.~ .. :-'
APPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
March 13, 1995
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. BOULDER RIDGE by Dennis Lunski. Request for Planned Unit Development
Concept Review on 27.1 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 27.1
acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 11.40 acres, Rezoning from
Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres and Preliminary Plat of27.1 acres into 38 lots and 2
, outlots. Location: N. of Mitchell Road, West of Boulder Pointe.
1
y. B."~
Perry Ryan, representing the proponent, reviewed his project changes with the
Planning Commission. He noted that through the reconfigured lots and reduced
density, they have reduced tree loss to 21 %. There are 36 lots, not 38. They have
met setback requirements with the removal of 3 units. They have added a second
pretreatment pond on the southwest comer on the front yard and hard surface
drainage on Block 3. Access into the project has been relocated between Twin Lakes
Crossing and Cumberland Road, and this has been discussed with the City Engineer.
To improve the visual relationship to the existing wetland areas, they have removed
3 twinhomes and realigned Boulder Pointe Road. They have modified the width on
the lots on the western end of the development. In doing that, they were able to
reduce the tree loss to 21 %. He noted that they did a lot size study of Boulder Pointe
and Boulder Ridge by looking at how far the rear lot lines went into the wetland.
They would rather leave the wetland outlot as large as possible.
Clinton expressed concern about the route to get to unit # I in Boulder Place with the
extension of the driveway. Ryan showed the route on the map, and noted that they
met with the Fire Marshal and it does meet with his approval.
Ismail asked for an explanation of #12 on the map. Ryan replied that #12 is the
common area around the twinhomes area.
Clinton asked if the cul-de-sac meets the Fire Marshal's requirements. Ryan
responded that it does.
Clinton questioned what the radius is. Ryan replied that the radius is at 40 feet, half
of what the minimum requirement is for the tum-around.
Uram reviewed the Staffs recommendations with the Planning Commission. He
noted that because this information is new to them, Staff needs a chance to review
the plan. However, Staffis recommending approval of the project subject to a listing
of recommendations that are listed in the Staff Report. Two things should be added
to that list of recommendations. In terms of the NURP pond next to unit #1, Staffis
concerned aboutthe setback of the pond itself. Staff would like the opportunity to
look at that closer. Regarding item G, the sight distance information in the Staff
Report, Staff wants part of the recommendation to say that prior to Council approval,
the sight distance should be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
Julia Larson. 8705 Mitchell Road. noted that they live across the road from the new
proposed project. She said that they were in Arizona at the time of the previous
meeting and were unfamiliar with what was going on until now. The triangular piece
of property that is part of the Boulder Ridge development, located east of Mitchell
Road, is adjacent to their property. She expressed concern about the maintenance of
, the property because of the weeds. She said that they were told that if the property
2
across the road from them would get sewer that it would be available to them. She
is concerned that they will not get sewer.
Uram noted that the property would be left natural. . This is not the type of parkland
that the City would keep maintained. This is a question for the Parks and Recreation
Commission, and they meet on Monday night before the City Council.
Ryan commented that it is not feasible to have a sewer system. He said that it's about
20 feet deep, but once they drop grade and get to the end of the line, it's too shallow.
Uram noted that this is an issue to be raised with the City Engineer and he would be
happy to investigate it.
Scott Ross, 14898 Boulder Pointe Road. noted that concerns have come up from
the neighborhood meetings and the last Planning Commission meeting. He said that
the twinhome density is a big improvement to the extent that people are not opposed
to the twinhomes. He expressed concern about the density with respect to Boulder
Point Road. He said that in order to reduce tree loss at the west end of Boulder
Ridge, they have made the lots wider, but have necessitated narrowing lots at the
eastern end. He expressed concern about $385,000 homes all having 3 car garages
and looking like soldiers in a row. It will be very tight, especially on the north side
of Boulder Pointe Road. He also expressed concern about the aesthetics of the
development.
Ryan commented that they have widened those couple of lots to try to preserve Lot
1, Block 2. They did not modify many because there was additional footages within
these lots that did not necessarily show up within that.
Clinton suggested that Mr. Ross look at the lots and homes in Boulder Ridge 2nd
because this will help him get a visual picture of how these lots will sit.
Bauer stated that he supports the project with a couple of reservations. He would
prefer that the Commission suggest that the matter be continued, but publish it for the
Council meeting in light of the NURP pond issue. He is also concerned about the
sewer and water as to whether or not there has been some misrepresentation in the
past.
Foote noted that he agrees with Bauer that it should be continued. He asked what the
pitch on the roofs are. Lunski replied that it's 8/12, and the back is 12. It's a lower
pitch which gives it more of an individual look.
r Schlampp commented that he agrees with Bauer and supports the project.
3
Wissner supports the project but expressed concern about the vision lines. She
would like that to be addressed before the City Council. She is also concerned
about the Larson's being told that they would have sewers.
Ismail noted that the project is very nice but he would like to see all the changes
documented before it's approved.
Clinton stated that he agrees with Ismail and would like to see the site plan
resubmitted. He said that he is comfortable with the new plan.
Kardell commented that the Commission likes the changes but they generally will
not approve a project until they had a chance themselves to review final plans.
She wants to see final plans and they will publish it early for the Council meeting
so that the developers will not be unduly hampered in their timing. The
Commission wants to include in the Staff recommendations for the next meeting
Dram's suggestion with respect to the setback of the NURP pond, as well as the
sight vision distance data to be included.
Schlampp noted that he would like some input from the Engineering Department.
Dram replied that he will submit a memo from Al Gray, the Engineer.
MOTION 1: Clinton moved, seconded by Bauer, to continue for 2 weeks to the
March 27th meeting, with the direction to publish it to the City Council. Motion
carried 7-0-0.
V. B. -8
r
IV.
A.
APPROVEDM~TES
EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION
February 13, 1995
PUBLIC HEARINGS
BOULDER RIDGE by Dennis Lunski. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 27.1 acres, Planned Unit Development
District Review on 27.1 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5
on 11.40 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres and Preliminary
Plat of 27.1 acres into 39 lots and 2 outlots. Location: N. of Mitchell Road,
West of Boulder Pointe.
Franzen introduced Perry Ryan, representing Dennis Lunski, who will make a
brief presentation, after which Staff will review the Staff Report.
1
Y. b. -q
Perry Ryan, Engineering Consultant, reviewed his project with the Planning
Commission using visual aids. He noted that this development consists of 25
single and 14 twinhomes, with a gross density of 1.4 units per acre. He
discussed the concerns of residents that were raised at the neighborhood
meeting which are outlined in the letter from Mr. Scott Ross, the spokesperson
for the Association. At this time they have not made any modifications and
are looking for recommendations from the Planning Commission. The main
concern from the neighbors was maintaining the integrity and similar look of
the neighborhood on Boulder Pointe. The other concern was density of the
project and specifically lot frontages. He discussed the developer's views
regarding the pros and cons of twinhomes versus single family. He said the
construction of the twinhomes was not an issue by the residents. He noted that
the Staff Report reflects a tree loss of 58 %, but their submittal to the City
calculated the tree loss at 27 % .
Sandstad asked if they had anything from the City in writing regarding
agreement with the 27 % tree loss. Ryan replied they do not.
Ryan noted that on the wetland setback issue, the difficulty is the location of
the road at the end of Boulder Pointe starting with the road at that location.
He does not believe that reducing the density on the site is necessary to meet a
30 % tree loss. He stated that he would like the Planning Commission to
follow Mr. Franzen's first recommendation in the Staff Report.
Foote expressed concern about the price of the homes. Ryan replied that the
twinhomes will start in the high 250's and in the mid 300's. The minimum
value of the single family homes will be in the high 380's.
Foote expressed concern about the homes adjacent to this project being
considerably lower in price.
Sandstad asked if there was any problem with aligning the new Boulder Pointe
Road to Cumberland as they intersect at Mitchell Road. Franzen replied that
Staff recommends that these intersections line up opposite each other.
Wissner expressed concern regarding the houses that will back up to Pheasant
Oaks, whether they will be one or two story homes. Ryan replied that the
first couple of lots coming into the development will be single family homes.
As you get to Lots #8, #9, #10, those will be walk-out homes, but they are not
sure if they will be two story or single story.
Wissner expressed concern about the first lot being 16,350 square feet, and
then it goes down to 13,500 on two lots and back up to 14,000. Ryan replied
that realistically it may not end up looking like that. He said the intent was at
2
-sl. b. -)0
fIrst to have more of a landscape buffer in there, possibly a monument, and
that's why those lots are larger.
Clinton asked if a sight alignment for the intersection of Boulder Pointe Road
and Mitchell Road was done. Franzen replied that he and Staff members went
out in a vehicle at those intersections and looked to see how far they could see
in each direction around the curves in the road. He noted that you can not see
too well looking north or south at either of those intersections based on
existing conditions. Berming and landscaping on the proposed plan also
restricts sight vision distance. The intersections do not meet current standards.
Kardell noted that the preliminary grading plan has changed and the developer
is going to submit a more detailed grading plan, and asked if Staff has seen it.
Franzen replied that he has not.
Kardell noted to the developer that the Planning Commission will not be
inclined to take action without fInal plans.
Wissner asked if there were any other developments where the Planning
Commission has gone with a 10 foot setback between buildings. Franzen
replied no.
Franzen reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commission. He noted
that this is a site where the trees are concentrated. The homes are close to the
trees in those locations and that's probably the primary reason for the high tree
loss. Staff will not support a 10 foot setback between buildings, in the twin
home area. The storm water treatment pond, between the single family homes
and the twin homes, is not large enough to handle drainage from the twinhome
area. The last performance standard that has an impact on the project would
be the location of the road and the intersections with the streets. He noted
that the Staff Report was set up as an optional report and the Staff had
suggested a second alternative for revisions in the plan to reduce trees and
wetland impacts.
Scott Ross. 14898 Boulder Pointe Road. noted that he is the third lot west of
the proposed Boulder Ridge Development. He urged the Planning Commission
to adopt the second proposal on the Staff Report. He expressed concern about
the density of the overall site. He is concerned that if twinhomes are close
together you will not be able to see between them. He strongly urges the
removal of at least one twinhome building which allows spreading of the other
twinhomes on the property, and to diminish the tree loss in that portion of the
property, and maintain better setbacks from the wetland. He expressed concern
about the integrity of the homes appearing different in the neighborhood, and
urges removing some of the single family lots.
3
-rr: 6. -1 \
Foote asked if Ross has a problem with the twin homes except for the density
issue. Ross replied that it's a good way of developing the land, but he does have
reservations about it.
Warren Paschke, 14441 Village Woods Drive, noted that his home is just north
of Lot #13, on the corner of Village Woods and Mitchell. He said his home is
a relatively small home as compared to many in the area. He expressed concerns
about the size and the height of the homes that were going on Lot #11, #12, and
#13, and the prices of the homes as compared to the neighborhood. He is
concerned about the amount of grading that's going into those particular lots, and
what kind of view he is going to have.
Franzen noted that Boulder Pointe Road is going to sit about six to eight feet
below the grade of the back of Mr. Paschke's property line. He said if he was
looking out his back, he would be looking probably into the fIrst floor of the
building.
Paschke expressed concern about which end of the development would they start
building at. Ryan replied more that likely it will be the western end of the
project.
Paschke asked if they anticipate any model homes in this development. Ryan
replied that he is not sure at this point.
Eric Steeney, 15331 Boulder Pointe Road, expressed concern about twin homes
not preserving the character of the neighborhood, and urges the other option
besides the one expressed by Mr. Ryan.
Scott Harbell, 8697 Hiawatha, stated that his lot backs up to Lot #3 and #4, and
possibly #5. He expressed concern about the density and the prices of the new
homes, and does not believe those lots are worth $80,000. He said he is
concerned about not being able to sell Lots #4 through #13, coming back and
wanting doubles to go in when he does not feel doubles fIt that whole area.
Referring to the cul-de-sac on Lot #4, he asked if the road would be roughly at
the top of the-ridge as it stands now. Ryan replied that it falls a couple of feet
below the top of that ridge.
Tim Henneby, 8781 Boulder Rise, indicated where he lives on the map, and
expressed concern about the 58 % tree loss and the over abundance of homes on
this property which does not fit the character of the neighborhood. He is
concerned about encroaching on the wetland area, and if the City is going to
lower their taxes for the loss and value of their view.
Kardell suggested keeping the twinhomes at a single story level to maintain the
view.
4
y. ~, -\2.,
Mary Rose Henneby, 8781 Boulder Rise, expressed concern about the land
across from Mitchell Road being dedicated as park land because it is a dangerous
spot for a park there.
Kardell noted that when they dedicate, it's usually part of the development. It's
not meant to be developed into a playground, but to remain in a natural condition.
Mary Rose Henneby asked if it would be possible to lower the density of the
twinhome area to move a double unit across the street to that park area. Kardell
replied that it probably would not be possible.
Dick Perrin, 8784 Boulder Rise, noted that he lives across from the Henneby's,
and concurred with Mr. Henneby's concern about the density.
David Welsh, 8797 Boulder Rise, expressed concern that the plans do not
include buffers which would screen the twinhomes from Mitchell Road. He noted
that according to the report, they are violating the site access for the driveway
which is indicative of the philosophy of trying to create more dollars on fewer
square feet.
John Smith, 14864 Boulder Pointe Road, expressed concern about the proposed
minimal view of the homes, and the high price tag of the homes. Regarding
elevation, he noted that the front exterior of the homes are acceptable, but what
they would look from behind is not.
Lisa Steeney, 15331 Boulder Pointe Road, expressed concern about the speed
limits of this development regarding the safety issue of her three children. She
is also concerned with the density issue. She does not like twinhomes and would
like to see an alternative plan.
Eric Steeney asked who has fIrst right of this property. Ryan replied that his
understanding is that Mason Homes never did have fIrst right on that property,
but they lead people to believe that they did.
Sandstad expressed concern about the tree loss. He wants to see plans that show
something in the 25 % range. He is concerned about the 30 % slope on Lots #1,
#2, and #3 on both blocks 1 and 2. He commented about the intersection issues
and feels there has to be a better way to provide access. He would like to see the
storm water issues revised, and reduced density of block 3 in the twinhorne area.
He noted that twinhomes in the area would be reasonable if the access is a little
more appropriate, and they have something similar to the typical distance between
buildings, rather than one on top of each other. He would like to see the
developer go back and work on these issues.
5
Foote noted that he concurred with all of Sandstad's concerns. He is not
comfortable with twinhomes in a single family home area, but it may work if the
density was lowered.
Schlampp expressed concern that the twinhomes are too high, and suggested
taking out at least two units.
Wissner stated that her fIrst impression of this project was a 1950's layout. She
said that she would like to see a little more creativity on the property because it's
a unique piece and there is a need to lower the density because of trees loss and
wetland impacts.
Clinton expressed concern about the development being in close proximity to
Mitchell Road, and would like some creative thought put into redesigning it. He
said the redesign could be better. He supports reduction in the density for
twinhomes, as well as the single family homes, on Lots #1 and #2 on block 1 and
2. He also expressed a strong concern about the speeding limit not being strictly
enforced in that area and the dangers of it.
Bauer stated that he is not comfortable moving on at this point because there is
no plan confIrming lower tree loss as stated by the developer. He noted that Lot
#3, block 3, is a total puzzle to him why units are so close together and yet tree
loss is 58 %. He thought the density was too high.
Kardell recommended this project be continued, and listed the issues that Sandstad
and the Planning Commission would like reviewed. They want confIrmation of
tree loss, 30 % or less. They want the builder to review the slopes and the trees
on Lot #1 and #2 on both block 1 and 2, also known as the "cliff lots." They
want the road intersection issues involving visibility of site lines worked out.
They want an appropriate storm water drainage solution, and a reduction in the
density of the twinhomes.
She noted that she personally has no problem with the twinhomes that are being
built because they are very lovely and well maintained. She would agree if the
developer indicates that they are willing to confirm that they will be single story.
She said that" she concurs with the City policy of the 65 foot setback to the
wetlands. She also shares the concerns about the homes that back up to Pheasant
Run. She would like it if they do not have three stories towering over the homes.
Sandstad stated that he can not agree to that condition on the motion because they
have single family adjacent to single family. He noted that Lots #12 and #13 are
substantially below the grade of the existing homes. He does not see any need
to change anything there. He doesn't like adding restrictions as to building color
or building height, and things of that nature.
6
V.~.-I~
Wissner stated that aesthetically it would just be overwhelming if the twinhomes
were not single story, because of the high density. Reduced density to meet
setbacks and reduced tree loss make it a better place.
Sandstad said that they don't have any policy ordinances to get involved.
Foote noted that these houses will be a lot larger than the ones in Pheasant Oaks
and would like to see them made smaller, but they don't have an ordinance to do
that.
Franzen noted that the City can't require single family zoning district to have
restrictions on the height less than allowed by code. He referred to the Hartford
project last summer where the developer agreed to single story, but it was all
voluntary on his part. The only way this can be done is if the developer agrees
to this as part of the public hearing. Otherwise it's standard two story walkout.
Foote asked if the developer is willing to do that. Ryan replied that Mr. Lunski
was unable to attend so he can not answer that.
Bauer suggested continuing this for 30 days.
Ryan noted that he strongly urges the Planning Commission to have it continued
for two weeks.
Bauer suggested continuing for 30 days, but if an item drops off at the next
meeting they can accommodate him. Franzen replied that they must know now
which date because they have to give the residents notice tonight of when this
project will be scheduled again.
MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Foote, to continue to the March 13,
1995 meeting in 30 days. Motion carried 7-0-0.
7
¥oB,-IS-
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
March 24, 1995
Boulder Ridge
Dennis Lunski
Virgil Siefert
N. of Mitchell Road, West of Boulder Pointe
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 27.1 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 27.1 acres.
3. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 11.40
acres and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of 27.1 acres into 36 lots and 2 outlots.
1
/
L
i
!
I
i"
~ . ,
F L. Y I Ii G c c. 0 U 0
¥. ES. -17
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
PLAN REVISIONS
This is a continued item from the March 13, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. The
Developer has made the following changes to the plan as recommended by the Planning
Commission:
1. A tree replacement plan for 82 caliper inches has been provided.
2. A five-foot wide concrete sidewalk is shown on the north side of Boulder Road.
3. Conservancy easements are shown on the preliminary plat around the wetland areas.
4. All buildings meet the required 30 foot front yard setback from Mitchell Road in the
twinhome area.
5. The NURP pond has been redesigned next to Unit 1 to meet NURP pond guidelines.
6. Lot lines and lot sizes have been shown in the twinhome area. The twinhome lots meet
the minimum 6,500 square feet of land area per unit.
7. The driveway entrance from Boulder Place to Mitchell Road meets acceptable site vision
distance. Berming and plantings have been moved back from the r0~d to create a clear
line of vision.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff would recommend approval of the Boulder Ridge project based on plans dated March
24, 1995 subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated February 10, 1995, March
10, 1995 and March 24, 1995 and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review
by the City Engineer.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review
by the Watershed District.
--y: ~. -I g
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over final fire code requirements.
3. Prior to release of the final plat, developer shall provide copies of a recorded
Conservation Easement to the City covering the wetland areas.
4. Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall stake the construction limits with
fencing. The City and Watershed District shall be given 48 hours notice before grading
so that the fencing for tree protection and erosion control can be inspected.
5. Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall provide the City with a security
equal to 150 % of the cost of the tree replacement for 82 caliper inches.
Jr
'IJ:.B.-19
-MEMORANDUM -
TO: Addendum to Staff Report of Boulder Ridge
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson, Senior Engineering Technician
DATE: March 24, 1995
SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Service to Larson and Bergstrom Properties
There are two feasible alternatives for providing sanitary sewer service to the Larson and Bergstrom
properties located on the east side of Mitchell Road and south of Cumberland Road. The first alternative
consists of connection to sewer within Flescher Circle and extension of sewer across existing park
property to the southeast corner of the above described properties. This alternative would involve the
construction of approximately 350 lineal feet of sanitary sewer to provide service to the southeast corner
of Bergstrom property and also require extension across Bergstrom property to serve the Larson property.
The second alternative consists of requiring the developer of Boulder Ridge Development to place an
additional manhole near Lot 13 of the townhouse area and make provisions for a sewer line to be
"jacked" under Mitchell Road and from there extended into the Larson and Bergstrom properties. This
alternative seems to be the most efficient and is the one that staff would recommend.
Staff has spoken with the developer's engineer regarding this matter and the engineer has agreed to
incorporate the additional manhole and sanitary sewer into the construction plans. The engineer is
currently in the process of preparing construction plans.
JJ:ssa
Dsk:JJ .Bergstrm.lar
-y,~. -Zc
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Engineering Division, Department of Public Works
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
•
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
March 10, 1995
Boulder Ridge
Dennis Lunski
Virgil Siefert
N. of Mitchell Road, West of Boulder Pointe
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 27.1 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 27.1 acres.
3. Zoning District Change from Rural to RI-13.5 on 11.40
acres and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of 27.1 acres into 36 lots and 2 outlots.
1
y. B. -21
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
March 10, 1995
This is a continued item from the February 13, 1995 meeting. The Planning Commission
previously recommended that the development plans be returned to the proponent for plan
reVISIons. The following is a list of commission recommended plan revisions followed by the
solution.
1. Reduce tree loss to 30%.
The plan has been revised to reduce tree loss to 21 %. Tree loss is 296 inches out of a
total of 1,442 inches on the property. This was accomplished by removing three
twinhome units out of the twinhome area and creating larger lots sizes where significant
trees exist on the single family lots nearest Boulder Pointe Phase 1.
To insure that tree loss is maintained at 21 % during and after construction, will require
that conservancy easements be drafted for each of the lots where there are significant
trees. These easements must start at a distance 10 feet off the back of each building and
extend to the end of the lots. On Lot 1, Block 2, a retaining wall must be constructed
along the western edge of the building pad to preserve trees.
2. Reduce twinhome density.
The twinhome project was previously at a density of 3.68 units per acre. The removal
of three units reduces the density to 2.84 units per acre.
3. Meet the required 25 foot setback between buildings.
Since the site plan does not show building footprints, it cannot be determined if the
project meets this requirement. With the removal of 3 units there is no reason to believe
the requirement can't be met. A plan is needed for verification.
4. Pretreat all storm water to NURP standards.
A second storm water pretreatment pond has been added to pretreat storm water from
the twinhome project area. The side slopes do not meet NURP standards.
5. Look at other ways of providing access into the project which improves site vision
distance.
Access into the project has been relocated half way in between Twin Lakes Crossing and
Cumberland Road. The City Engineer believes this location will work, but will not
-V:B.-2~
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
March 10, 1995
approve the location until site vision distance data is provided. This data will have an
impact on berm heights and tree locations.
6. Improve the visual relationship to the existing wetland areas.
Removing 3 twin homes from the project improves the visual relationship to the wetlands
on the western edge of the project. Where no existing Oak tree cover exists, a wetland
planting plan is being proposed. This would consist of indigenous material, such as
Dogwoods, Aspens and other varieties. The average single family structure setback to
the delineated wetlands is 64 feet. The average twinhome setback to wetland is 52 feet.
The 65 foot setback to wetlands is not an ordinance requirement. The intent of the
setback is to encourage developers to prepare plans which preserve vegetation and
minimize visual intrusion on a wetland area. The shifting of lot lines allows for more
of the vegetative cover to remain on these lots on either side of Boulder Pointe Road.
Where the units are closest to the wetlands, a wetland enhancement planting plan is
proposed. A 25 foot conservation easement from the high water mark is required for all
lots with wetlands. This protects edge vegetation and nesting habitats.
7. Lot sizes on the western end of the project along Boulder Pointe Road should be
comparable to Boulder Pointe Phase I.
The average lot size has increased for the fIrst 4 lots on either side of the road from
26,140 to 29,760. This is still less than the average lot size in Boulder Pointe Phase I
of 31,280 sq. ft. However, of 10 wetland lots surveyed in Boulder Pointe Phase , 49 %
is occupied by wetland. In Boulder Ridge, this amount is 39 %. The proponent could
extend lot lines further into the wetland, especially on Lots 1 -4, Block 2 and increase
lot sizes, but would prefer to dedicate more of the wetland to the City.
RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL PLAN CHANGES
Lot 1, Block 3, in the twinhome area does not meet the required 30 foot setback from the street
right-of-way. Assuming that the building will take up most of the pad area, it is questionable
whether or not there is adequate maneuvering area for a vehicle to enter from Boulder Place
private drive into the unit. The proposed pretreatment pond is very close to unit #1 and the side
slopes at 2: 1 does not meet current NURP standards. It is not possible to move unit #1 farther
away from the road right-of-way without cutting down more significant trees. All of this
suggests that the site plan is too tight. If the twinhome plan can be revised to shift buildings
around so that there is adequate room to save trees, construct a NURP pond to City standards
"3t.B.-Z3
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
March 10, 1995
and meet setbacks, then no additional unit reduction would be necessary.
The preliminary plat does not indicate lot lines for the twinhome units. Since these units are for
ownership, it can be expected that land will be subdivided. The proponent must provide a
drawing showing how a preliminary plat can meet the 6,500 sq. ft. lot size requirement for each
twinhome unit.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Community and Economic Development staff present the following alternative courses of
action to the Planning Commission:
I. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the proposed plan for 25 single
family lots and 11 twinhome lots, then one option would be to recommend approval
of the plans based on plans dated January 23, 1995 and based upon the following
conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall:
A. Submit a tree replacement plan for 82 caliper inches.
B. Modify the site plan to depict a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along
Boulder Pointe Road.
C. Revise the plan to show conservancy easements over all lots containing
significant trees beginning at a distance of 10 feet off of the rear building
extending to the rear lot lines. Conservancy easements are also required
on all lots with wetlands to a distance of 25 feet beyond the high water
mark.
D. Modify the site plan to meet the 30 foot front yard setback requirement
from Mitchell Road.
E. Redesign the NURP pond next to unit 1 to meet current NURP standards.
F. Revise the preliminary plat to depict lot lines and lot sizes in the
twinhome area.
Y.B.-ZLf
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
March 10, 1995
2. Prior to rmal plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for
review by the City Engineer.
B. Submit storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the cash park fee.
4. Prior to any construction on the property, the developer will be required to
stake all construction limits with snow fencing. The City and Watershed
District must be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of grading so
that the snow fencing and erosion control fencing may be inspected.
II. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with improvements to the plan but would
like to see the remaining items completed on a revised site plan and preliminary plat
before Council action, then one option would be to recommend a continuance of the
project.
Staff is comfortable with Alternative I.
V. B. -ZS-
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
February 10, 1995
Boulder Ridge
Dennis Lunski
Virgil Siefert
N. of Mitchell Road, West of Boulder Pointe
1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 27.1 acres.
2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 27.1 acres.
3. Zoning District Change from Rural to Rl-13.5 on 11.40
acres and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.8 acres.
4. Preliminary Plat of 27.1 acres into 39 lots and 2 outlots.
1
3£.. B.-2b
Stafr Report
Boulder Ridge
February 10, 1995
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN
The Comprehensive Guide Plan depicts this 27.1 acre site for Low Density Residential for up
to 2.5 units per gross acre or a total of 67 housing units. The gross density of the project is 1.4
units per acre. The Guide Plan Density is the maximum possible, but the actual density
permitted on a piece of property is based upon performance to City codes. Density is evaluated
based on many factors including relationship to surrounding uses (density and lot sizes),
environmental impacts (trees, wetlands, and slopes), and traffic.
This project is a Planned Unit Development with a mix of low and medium density land uses
if viewed as a Planned Unit Development than the densities could be averaged. If the combined
density is less than 2.5 units/gross acre, then it could be argued that no Guide Plan change
would be necessary.
If viewed as separate projects, than the single family area (2.19 units/acre) would be consistent
with the Guide Plan. The twinhome area (3.68 units/acre) would not be consistent with the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
The land uses issue could be debated either way, but staff believes that the interpretation of the
guide plan densities has been to consider the gross acreage as the determining factor. The
Sowles PUD was a mix of twinhomes and single family and the Gross Density was less than 2.5
units per acre. Centex Deerfield was a mixture of single family and multiple, but the gross
Density was 3.5 units per acre and a Guide Plan change was required. In areas where there are
no adjacent established neighborhoods, only the new residents are impacted by densities and
density averaging is easier to rationalize. In established neighborhoods, density averaging can
be more difficult to defend, when the Guide Plan does not depict the area as attached multiple
family housing.
DENSITY, LOT SIZE, AND TRANSITION
This piece of property is surrounded by land which is guided Low Density Residential and
developed as single family. The following chart provides a comparison between this project and
surrounding developments.
Yf3:>.-Z7
·siiBinvISIoNi ...... .
........•..•. ..... . ....•.........
Boulder Ridge
..
GROSS
DENSITY
1.4 units per acre
I·· ...
. NET DENSITY
2.56 units per acre
2.19 single family
3.68 twinhomes
Boulder Pointe -I 1.2 units per acre 1.2 units per acre
Boulder Pointe -II 1.7 units per acre 1.7 units per acre
Pheasant Oaks 1.75 units per acre 2 units per acre
.. . ... . ...
AVERAGELQTSIZE
. .. ... .. .....:"-
19,894 sq. ft.
(single family)
3,000 sq. ft.
(twinhomes)
31,280 sq. ft.
20,270 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft.
When reviewing infill projects, transition to surrounding uses is important. New projects should
be designed at comparable densities and lot sizes. If there is a difference in density and lot
sizes, then a physical-visual transition may be necessary. The density is greater than the
surrounding area.
One way to address transition would be to require that the Boulder Ridge project develop at an
"area wide" average net density of 1.63 units per acre or a total of 25 housing units. Another
way to address this transition is to look at the abutting properties and require that Boulder Ridge
be a "hybrid" of Boulder Pointe I and Pheasant Oaks. This may make more sense since Boulder
Pointe Phase II is separated from this site by a road and wetland. This may suggest that the
western portion of the site develop at a density of 1.2 units per acre with an average lot size of
31,280 square feet. Within the Boulder Ridge site, density could transition to two units per acre
and an average lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. on the eastern end to be compatible with Pheasant Oaks.
The proposed twinhome site is 3.68 units per net acre. This is a total of 14 dwelling units on
3.8 acres. While the total site is in conformance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan, the Guide
Plan does not depict a multiple family use for the property nor is multiple family zoning
immediately adjacent to the site. The nearest multiple family area is the David Carlson
townhomes, south and east of Boulder Pointe Phase II. This multiple family site was designated
in original 1983 Red Rock Ranch Planned Unit Development. In 1988 Mason Homes amended
the PUD, (although keeping the Multiple Family designation on that site), reducing the density
from about 7 to 3.65 units per acre.
It is not uncommon to have twinhomes adjacent to single family areas. The amount of density
that can occur within a twinhome area is based upon many factors including distance to the
single family homes, impacts on natural features, and compliance with setbacks and lot size
requirements. Lot size waivers, sideyard setback waivers from 25 to 10 feet, a waiver for a
private road, and a site tree loss of 58 %; suggests that the density of the twinhome project is
too high.
Y,8.-28
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
February 10, 1995
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
There are three types of environmental impacts on this project including trees, wetlands, and
slopes.
The City Planner and the City Forester have calculated tree loss at 58 % of the total significant
diameter inches of trees on site. There are a total of 1,138 inches of significant trees. Tree loss
is calculated at 660 inches. Tree replacement would be 509 inches. Tree loss is calculated
based on the trees that are physically cut down due to construction and the trees that have the
potential for damage due to construction practices such as proximity to foundations and streets
and the amount of earth work underneath the canopy of the tree.
The average tree loss for residential subdivisions is 30 %. One of the ways in which the tree loss
can be reduced is to lower the density in the twinhome area and create larger lots on the western
end on the single family portion of the project.
Since the enactment of the 1990 Wetlands Act, the City staff has suggested that homes be set
back at a distance of 65 feet from the high water mark of the wetlands. The first 25 feet from
the high water mark would be designated along with the wetland as a Conservation Easement.
This 25 foot dimension would be left in its natural form and would serve as potential for wildlife
habitat and also to filter out dirt and fertilizers.
All of the proposed lots within this subdivision can provide a 25 foot natural area from the high
water mark. Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 and Lots 1 -8, Block
3 would not meet the 65 foot setback dimension. The purpose of a 65 foot setback to the
wetland area is needed to preserve vegetation (significant trees) and as a visual separation from
the wetland.
There are some existing lots in Boulder Pointe -Phase I which do not meet this recommended
setback, however, these were built before the state wetland regulations.
The three wetland areas on this site make it difficult to meet the 65 foot requirement in all cases.
The average setback to wetland areas is approximately 150 feet when Wetland C is factored into
the equation. However, the use of density transfer to fulfill the requirements of the Shoreland
Ordinance for no lots in Outlot B (Wetland C) places more of the units closer to wetland type
A and wetland type B. The average setback is 40 feet.
The relationship to the wetland areas A and B can be improved by reducing tree loss,
eliminating the waivers from City code for setback and private road and by matching densities
and lot sizes to adjacent properties.
-srFS.-2..9
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
February 10, 1995
Lots 1,2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 1 -3, Block 2 have steep slopes (30%) and significant tree
cover on portions of the lots. There is minimal setback to the high water mark of the wetlands
based upon the pad depths proposed. Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2 will require a customized
grading plan. We had previously asked the proponent to provide this information, because it
appears that each of these homes will be set at an elevation approximately 6 to 10 feet lower
than Boulder Pointe Road and would require double basements to traverse the 42 foot grade
change and not f1l1 in the wetlands. This would be similar to some of the lots in the Boulder
Pointe Phase 1. The Building Department has indicated that developing on steep slopes will
require soil tests, soil compaction tests, and engineered footings and retaining walls.
SHORELAND ORDINANCE
McCoy Lake is classified as a natural environmental water. Any lot abutting or within 150 feet
of the high water mark must meet a 40,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size, a 120 foot lot width, and
a 150 foot setback. Most of Outlot B on the southeast side of Mitchell Road is either McCoy
Lake or wetland which leaves a very small sliver of land on a steep slope with trees. It is not
possible to construct a unit on this site of the road without a Shoreland variance. Joe Richter
of the Department of Natural Resources has indicated to City staff that they would support the
project provided there was no development on Outlot B.
TRAFFIC
The amount of traffic expected to be generated from this project is based upon the
Comprehensive Guide Plan at a density of 2.5 units per acre for a total of 67 units. This would
generate approximately 670 total daily trips and 67 trips during the peak hour. The current
proposal is for a total of 39 units which would generate 390 trips during the day, and 39 trips
during the peak hour. Since the actual density is less than the Comprehensive Guide Plan
density, no additional road improvements would be necessary to handle the amount of traffic.
Due to the change in eleva~on and curve on Mitchell Road, site vision distance does not meet
standards at both road intersections. For a 30 mile-an-hour road speed, a person must be able
to see approximately 500 feet to the left and right when approaching Mitchell Road from the
twinhome project or Boulder Pointe Road. No berming or landscaping can be placed between
the Boulder Place private road and Mitchell Road. This would also be true for the intersection
of Boulder Pointe Road and Cumberland Road. The proponent should provide the site line
information and indicate specifically where plant materials mayor may not be placed.
YB.-30
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
February 10, 1995
STORM WATER OUALITY
A storm water pretreatment pond is designated between the twinhome and single family areas.
This is sized to accommodate only the drainage from Boulder Pointe Road. The drainage from
Boulder Place private road must be directed towards the pretreatment pond or a second pond
constructed before discharge from this site. The drainage plan must be modified accordingly.
Rear yard drainage requires improvements for Lots 4 -13, Block 4. A storm sewer catch basin
is required to pick up the additional drainage and should be directed towards Boulder Pointe
Road.
SIDEWALKS
A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be required along Boulder Pointe Road to connect up to
the existing sidewalk in Boulder Pointe -Phase I.
RI-13.5 ZONING DISTRICT
The single family homes are proposed for R1-13.5 zoning. All of the lots meet this minimum
lot size requirement.
RM-6.5 ZONING DISTRICT
The twinhome project requires the following waivers:
1. Waiver from the minimum 6,500 sq. ft. lot size requirement for all 14 lots.
2. Waiver for a private road.
3. Waiver from 25 foot sideyard setback requirement between buildings to 10 feet.
Waivers can be granted if the developer can demonstrate that developing the site with waivers
is a better design than strict adherence to City code. Staff believes that the waivers do not result
in a better design.
CONCLUSION
The staff believes that a mix use development of single family and twinhomes can be an
acceptable use of the property. Wetlands limit the amount of developable area and concentrates
1TB ... 31
Stafr Report
Boulder Ridge
February 10, 1995
development so the net density is higher than the adjoining neighborhoods. Tree loss is
calculated at 58 %. Many of the proposed buildings are located closer to the wetland areas than
what the staff would recommend. Waivers from the City code are required for lot size, setbacks
and a private road in the twinhome area. All of these points suggest that the density of the
project may be higher than what the site can support on a performance basis consistent with City
codes and policies. If the Commission concurs with the staff analysis, then one option would
be to suggest a modified plan with a reduction in density.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Community and Economic Development staff presented the following alternative courses
of action to the Planning Commission:
I. If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the proposed development plan for
25 single family lots and 14 twinhome lots, then one option would be to recommend
approval based on plans dated January 23, 1995 and based on the following
conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review the proponent shall:
A. Submit a tree replacement plan for 509 inches.
B. Modify the plan to depict a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along Boulder
Pointe Road.
C. Conservancy easements would be required over all wetland areas and to
a distance of 25 feet above the high water mark.
D. Provide a modified storm water quality plan that pretreats the storm water
runoff from Boulder Place Road.
2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for
the City Engineer.
B. Submit storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans by the
Watershed District.
1.
Y . .B,-3z'
Staff Report
Boulder Ridge
February 10, 1995
3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the cash park fee.
4. Planned Unit Development Waivers are granted for sideyard setback from 25 feet
to 5 feet in the RM-6.5 Zoning District, waiver from the minimum lot size
requirement from 6,500 sq. ft. to 3,000 sq. ft. and waiver for a private road.
II. If the Planning Commission believes that impacts of this development on the
surrounding area, trees and wetlands, are high and that there are no compelling
reasons for the PUD waivers in the twinhome area, one option would be to
recommend that the project be continued with direction to reduce density to provide
a better transition, reduce tree loss, improve storm water quality, and lessen wetland
impacts.
III. If the Planning Commission believes that the impacts of the proposal on the
surrounding uses, trees, and wetland are high and that there are no compelling
reasons for the PUD waivers in the twinhome area, then one option would be to
recommend denial of the project based on the following criteria:
1. The project does not meet City code requirements for lots fronting on a public
street, sideyard setback of 25 feet in the RM-6.5 Zoning District, and the
minimum lot size of 6,500 sq. ft. in the RM-6.5 Zoning District.
2. The twinhome area is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
3. Densities and lot sizes are not comparable with the surrounding areas.
4. High tree loss.
5. Wetland impacts.
Y. f,.-33
February 7, 1995
Scott Ross
14898 Boulder Pointe Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347-2407
Mr. Michael Franzen and the
Eden Prairie Planning Commission
City Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-2230
Re: Proposed Boulder Ridge Development
Dear Mr. Franzen and Members of the Planning Commission:
On February 2nd, residents of the neighborhood surrounding the proposed Boulder Ridge
development met with the developer, Dennis Lunski, and his project engineer, Perry Ryan.
Mr. Lunski and Mr. Ryan articulated their plans for constructing 25 single family homes
and 14 "twinhomes" on that site north and east of Mitchell Road between Mitchell's
intersections with Cumberland and Victoria. The site is bordered on the north by the
Pheasant Oaks development.
I write this letter to summarize the concerns expressed in that meeting and to suggest
possibilities which may make the development better for all concerned. While the Boulder
Pointe Homeowner's Association has asked me to act as a spokesperson, I do so with the
caveat that each neighbor holds his or her own view which may differ from that expressed
here.
Consistency and Density
Many neighbors voiced concern over the density of the development and its inconsistency
with the surrounding neighborhood. As proposed, Boulder Pointe Road will extend from
Cumberland west to the present Boulder Pointe Road termination at the east end of
Boulder Pointe 1. Mr. Lunski's single family homes would line Boulder Pointe Road with
13 lots on the north side of the street and 12 lots on the south. Those lots nearest Boulder
Pointe I (those on the west side of Boulder Ridge) appear consistent in size with those of
Boulder Pointe 1. As one proceeds east on Boulder Pointe Road, however, the lots
become much smaller. Residents of both Boulder Pointe and Pheasant Oaks commented
that this will create sharply different characters of the street from larger and more sp~cious
Y6.-34
Letter to Eden Prairie Planning Commission
Re: Proposed Boulder Ridge Development
Page 2
on the west to smaller and more crowded on the east. In terms of composite average
density, Boulder Pointe I has 1.2 units per acre and the surrounding neighborhood has
1.75 units per acre. By contrast, Boulder Ridge has 2.5 units per acre. (Note: This
includes the twinhomes.) Lots proposed for Boulder Ridge are about 20,000 square feet,
on average, but are much smaller on the east end of the street. By contrast, Boulder
Pointe lots average 34,000 square feet.
To develop Boulder Ridge in such sharp contrast to the surrounding neighborhood creates
a number of problems. First, such development on steep slopes necessitates tree loss and
erosion which could be mitigated by wider lots where lots border the wetland. Second,
the proposed density upsets the settled expectations of neighbors. Residents bought
understanding that the CarlsonIBoulder Pointe Townhomes already existed or would be
built. Residents did not understand that multiple unit housing would go up on the
proposed Boulder Ridge site because the current city plans do not call for such multiple
family development. Even though Mr. Lunski claims that he uses the twinhomes to
minimize tree loss, this does not solve the land use transition to high density.
Many neighbors voiced other concerns about development of "twinhomes" in the
southeast section of the property between the wetlands and Mitchell Road. Mr. Lunski
argued persuasively that by keeping the development to single story units, the panorama
enjoyed by surrounding homes and by cars passing on Mitchell would be preserved better
than if someone built two story homes on that land. While this made sense to many in
attendance, many still believe that Mr. Lunski plans to build too many twinbomes. Maybe
people would be able to see over the proposed twinhomes, but no one could see between
them. People believed that there are too many twinbomes crowded too close together.
Overall, the density of the development represented the most prevalent concern for
neighbors. Underlying this concern, however, are other consequential problems, the
impact of which is not entirely clear at this stage. Higher density necessitates greater tree
loss. The more houses along Boulder Pointe Road and the more twinhome units, the
more trees tumble. Mr. Franzen quoted a neighbor who called this land an "oak tree
savanna." While the site does not have that many trees relative to some other parcels,
virtually every tree there deserves careful preservation efforts. The City should also pay
particular attention to development at the west end of Boulder Pointe Road to maintain
the relatively high tree population there. As these sites are especially steep, losing lots of
trees there may lead to erosion or require excessive retaining wall construction (which
creates both esthetic and environmental complications).
Density of the twinbome development not only sacrifices trees but encroaches on the
wetland. In order to preserve the wetland, it is important to keep the twinhomes back
away from the wetland. While the City follows a policy requiring side yard setbacks of 65
feet from wetlands, the present siting of the twinhomes does not meet that standard.
Obviously, the City should meet the 65 foot policy minimum setbacks and consider '
"]l." B, -3S-
Letter to Eden Prairie Planning Commission
Re: Proposed Boulder Ridge Development
Page 3
reasonable ways to increase even these minimum distances in order to preserve the
wetland.
Traffic Safety
Neighbors also expressed concern over traffic safety. This problem appears in two forms,
visibility at intersections and traffic speed.
Mitchell Road is a 30 mile per hour street without any driveways in that section which
runs through the proposed Boulder Ridge development. Coming from the north, Mitchell
runs virtually straight north/south, as one proceeds south by the site, the road bends to the
west. Even though this is a 30 mile per hour zone, traffic often moves faster. The
combination of this curve and the brisk traffic speed means that left turns onto Mitchell
out of the twinhome driveway and off of Boulder Pointe Road may be tricky if there is any
obstruction to view. Site lines are likely shortened by the road curvature and reaction
times shortened by traffic speed. Special attention should be paid to the visibility to the
north from Boulder Pointe Road and to the east from the twinhome drive. This means
that any berms, shrubbery, signage or monuments planned for these intersections should
be very carefully planned and evaluated.
Boulder Pointe Road presently houses families with lots of small children. Residents are
concerned that the proposed extension of Boulder Pointe Road through the Boulder Ridge
development offers no means to control traffic speed. Since this will be the main route for
the neighborhood to access roads heading into MinneapolisiSt. Paul, people are concerned
that lots of traffic, even conscientious neighborhood residents, will drive too fast for child
safety. While neighbors failed to state any universally acclaimed proposals for keeping
Boulder Pointe Road speeds in check, some measures should be considered by the
Planning Commission.
Summary
Mr. Lunski claims that he wants to develop Boulder Ridge to be a very nice
neighborhood. No one doubts his sincerity on that issue. Neighbors do believe, however,
that Mr. Lunski wants to develop to a density which will harm some of the very features
which make the land so attractive. If developed as currently proposed, there are simply
too many houses and twinhomes to maintain consistency with the surrounding
neighborhood and to preserve soil, tree and wetland resources. Paring down the number
of single family homes and twinhome units will increase the attractiveness of the area to
home buyers while saving very special natural features of the land. Finally, careful traffic
planning is needed to alleviate potential problems with dangerous intersections and unsafe
traffic speeds.
Letter to Eden Prairie Planning Commission
Re: Proposed Boulder Ridge Development
Page 4
Thank you for your consideration. If you would like to call me to discuss this matter
further, please do not hesitate to call me at home (975.9755) or at work (936.5573).
Scott Ross
cc: Eden Prairie City Council
Boulder Pointe Homeowners' Association
Dennis Lunski
Perry Ryan
Y.B.-37
From: GARY KNUTSON To: Chris Enger/EP Devel. Date: 1125195 Time: 12:28:51
Gary L. Knutson
14824 LANGDON PLACE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN. 55347
612-949-8789
Wednesday, January 25, 1995
Chris Enger -Director
Community Development Dept.
Eden Prairie, MN
CC: Micheal Franzen -Senior Planner
Mayor Jean Harris
City Council Members -
Fax -949-8390 Nancy Tyra Lukens
Patricia Pidcock
Ron Case
Re: Boulder Ridge Proposal
This is a follow-up to my letter of January 11 to you and those copied above. My letter was an
inquiry into the many issues that the proposed Boulder Ridge development has raised. There is
little question that the lack of reference we, as Boulder Pointe residents, have for Mr. Lunski's
commitment for quality work, has compounded our concerns. However, in reviewing the proposed
plan, there is an obvious disregard for the surrounding developments and for the land it's self. As
always; what is said, is tempered by what is done.
It was my expectation that I would receive a reply to my correspondence to you, of Jan. 11. If
nothing other than an acknowledgment of receipt. We as a group of existing residents have
legitimate concerns and questions. We are dependent on you and your people to do what is best
for Eden Prairie's existing developments. A selling session, or so called Neighborhood Meeting, by
the developer on Feb. 2 will not answer our questions. I was particularly concerned that City of
Eden Prairie stationery and postage were used to advertise the supposed neighborhood meeting. I
would expect that the developer will reimburse the City. This is a private project!!!
Again, here are my concerns and questions:
1. Doubling the population density that is adjacent to the proposed
development. The plan crams in as many dwellings as possible, apparently
without concern for existing developments. How can this be acceptable?
2. The plan appears to call for walkouts near the top of the ridge, overlooking the
small lake or pond. The existing topography of this land makes this nearly
impossible. The plan is to reduce the elevations? What affect does that have on
the lake? And how will the integrity of the lake be guaranteed during and after
construction. How does this change in elevation affect existing foliage,
particu1arly the wetlands on the backside of the ridge.
3. Has an environmental impact plan been filed? Will there be a net loss of
wetlands? Will there be any removal of primary stand Hardwoods?
4. Are there proposed restrictions and covenants? What are they?
5. What are the suggestions to insure traffic control and safety?
6. Is there a list of existing customers/purchasers of houses built by the proposed
Y6. -38
Page 1 of 2
From: GARY KNUTSON To: Chris Enger/EP Devel. Dale: 1125/95 lime: 12.29.54
builders? The list should include all building permits issued for projects within
Eden Prairie. Has anyone checked on the financial reliability and previous
history of the proposed builders and the developer?
These are only a representative sample of my concerns and questions. Are there answers to
any of them? Please let me know what has or has not been done with each by your
department. I would appreciate your response prior to the Feb. 2 meeting.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Gary L. Knutson
1fb. -39
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director Parks, Recreation and Facilities
FROM: Stuart A. FO~nager of Parks and Natural Resources
DATE: March 16, 1995
SUBJECT: Supplemental Report to the February 10, 1995 and March 10, 1995 Community
Development Staff Report for Boulder Ridge
BACKGROUND:
The fee owner for this parcel of property is Virgil Siefert and the developer of the project is
Dennis Lunski. The site is 27.1 acres in size and is currently zoned low density residential.
The proposed plan shows this parcel of land being split into two parcels, one of 11.4 acres for
single family homes on RI-13.5 lots and an additional 3.8 acres of property being developed into
multiple family houses at RM-6.5. In addition, there are two outlots of 4 and 5.5 acres in size,
which include the wetlands on the site.
ISSUES:
Tree Preservation -Since the original proposal over a month ago, the tree loss has been
reduced from a 58 % loss down to the current loss of 21 %. This has been accomplished by
removing three twinhome units from the multiple family area and increasing the lot sizes on the
westerly end of the single family home row to accommodate more area for building pad sites.
In addition, the staff has recommended that conservancy easements be drafted for several lots
where there are significant trees. These easements would start a distance of 10 feet off the back
of each unit and extend to the end of the lots. This would ensure that large trees would be
protected following the initial development of both single family and multiple family homes.
Wetland Inpacts and Strom Water Treatment:
The proponent is required to follow all Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District regulations
and submit a detailed plan to the City Engineer before final plan approval. The proposed site
has two NURP ponds; however, one of the storm water treatment ponds does not have side
slopes that meet current standards. This treatment pond is the one adjacent to the twinhomes
and the staff would recommend that this be reconfigured or redesigned prior to approval of the
final plat.
,
In addition to the storm water issues the impact on wetlands would result in dedication of Outlots
A and B to the City of Eden Prairie. These lots currently are defined as public wetlands and,
therefore, would be unbuildable. One additional note is that Outlot A is part of the chain of
lakes project and contains a pipe that takes water from Red Rock Lake and forwards it into
McCoy Lake.
SIDEWALK AND TRAIL ISSUES:
The project has one public road and one private street. The staff recommends that the sidewalk
existing on the north side of Boulder Point Road be extended easterly to Mitchell Road. In
addition, the staff recommends that the existing eight foot bituminous trail along Mitchell Road
be protected and/or restored during the construction phase of this project.
No sidewalk or trail connection is recommended for the private street serving the twinhomes.
RECOMMENDATION:
This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their March 13, 1995 meeting and
was approved based on the staff recommendation alternative "I." The staff would also
recommend the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission approve this project based
on those staff recommendations as detailed in the March 1 0, 1995 Staff Report from Michael
D. Franzen, City Planner.
1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall:
A. Submit a tree replacement plan for 82 caliper inches.
B. Modify the site plan to depict a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Boulder
Pointe Road.
C. Revise the plan to show conservancy easements over all lots containing significant
trees beginning at a distance of 10 feet off of the rear building extending to the
rear lot lines. Conservancy easements are also required on all lots with wetlands
to a distance of 25 feet beyond the high water mark.
D. Modify the site plan to meet the 30-foot front yard setback requirement from
Mitchell Road.
E. Redesign the NURP pond next to unit 1 to meet current NURP standards.
F. Revise the preliminary plat to depict lot lines and lot sizes in the twinhome area.
2. Prior to f"mal plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review
by the City Engineer.
,
B. Submit storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the
Watershed District.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the cash park fee.
4. Prior to any construction on the property, the developer will be required to stake
all construction limits with snow fencing. The City and Watershed District must be
notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of grading so that the snow fencing and
erosion control fencing may be inspected.
BRidge/Stuart
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 4-4-95
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. T.e.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger SUTTON ADDITION
Michael D. Franzen
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
• lst Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 4.95 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential on 4.95 acres;
• Adopt a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 4.95 acres into 16 lots.
BACKGROUND:
This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at the March 27, 1995 meeting. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from
Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Rezoning from RM-6.5, Preliminary Plat for
16 twinhome units.
SUPPORTING REPORTS:
1. Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan
2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat
3. Staff Report dated March 10, 1995
4. Correspondence
5. Planning Commission Minutes dated March 13, 1995
-rr: c. -,
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
SUTTON ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and
comment; and
WHEREAS, the proposal of Sutton Addition by Builtwell Construction for construction
of 16 lots on approximately 4.95 acres, requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 4.95 acres from
Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential all located at County Road 4 south of
Senior Center.
ADOPrED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
v. c... -2...
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
SUTTON ADDITION
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF SUTTON ADDITION FOR BUILTWELL CONSTRUCTION
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
That the preliminary plat of Sutton Addition for Builtwell Construction dated March 27, 1995,
consisting of 4.95 acres, a copy of which is on ftle at the City Hall, is found to be in
conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and
amendments thereto, and is herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 4th day of April, 1995.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
John D. Frane, City Clerk
-Yc..-3
Approved fJ\if\,.,.Je.S
E:;. P. PIA ....... : "j Cc",,,,,,'~~i 0 "-
flbl'~ \"3J 1995
B. HIGH POINTE 2ND ADDITION by Builtwell Construction, Inc. Request for
Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium
Density Residential on 4.98 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 4.98 acres
and Preliminary Plat of 4.9 acres into 16 lots. Location: Northwest Quadrant
of the Intersection of Pioneer Trail and County Road 4, south of the Senior
Center.
Dick Krier, planner, reviewed his project with the Planning Commission. He
noted that they have made some changes so there is no need for any variances.
There was a neighborhood meeting on March 1st and they have made several
changes from the Staff's original comments.
These are twinhomes in the $225,000 to $275,000 range. They are all on 6,500
square foot lots with double garages. The site provides transition from single
family homes of Cedar Ridge and transition to the Senior Center just to the north.
People who will buy these homes are empty nesters and there is attraction to the
Senior Center. He noted that they reviewed the Staff Report and concur with the
recommendations, but they are unsure of the sidewalks.
4
Y. c.. -LJ
Uram noted that the sidewalk issue will be addressed at the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
Ismail expressed concern about the construction vehicles using the same entrance as
the Senior Center. Krier replied that the construction vehicles will not use that
access. Ismail expressed concern about the elevations. Krier responded that it's
slightly higher and he showed him on the map the different elevations.
Uram noted that this type of project has become fairly typical in Eden Prairie.
Wissner commented that over the last few years they have seen a lot of twinhome
developments in this price range, and she is beginning to feel a little discomfort that
these are being built. She is concerned for the future that they are not overbuilding
in a certain price range making it impossible for the empty nesters 20 years from now
to afford this.
Kardell noted that she is very uncomfortable with this, but she understands the
economics of it.
Foote said that he applauds Wissner for raising this issue because he has thought this
way for a long time.
Uram stated these projects are built based upon supply and demand and the City is
not in a position to dictate the price of these units. The project as it is presented does
meet the ordinances and policies of the City of Eden Prairie according to the Staff
Report.
Wissner said that she made this statement because she wants it on the record, so that
10 years down the line they will know that the Commission was concerned and the
City knows their concerned. She commented that it's a lovely townhome complex.
She likes the design and it looks great.
Bauer noted that he's ready to support the project.
Bob Fafinski. 8796 Cottonwood Lane, noted that he is the adjacent land owner. He
said the project looks fme but his concern is erosion problem caused by runoff along
the back of his property.
Krier commented that they are proposing a dry NURP pond and he showed him on
the map where it will be located. He said that it is used to hold the water for a short
period of time. Fafinski asked if there's a pond back in the woods area behind the
,park. Krier replied that it's way over on the other side of the park.
5
-v. c.. -S-
Uram noted that they are still working on the drainage with the City Engineer, and
they should be able to resolve any problems.
Jeff Churns, 9099 Gould Road, noted that he lives about 200 feet from the property
and he didn't know anything about the neighborhood meeting. He expressed concern
about the mention of a temporary cul-de-sac because that would be for quite a few
years. He said that having a black and white stripped sign would not be appealing
for the neighborhood. He also expressed concern that some of the trees have Dutch
Elm disease and sees a need for them to be dealt with and replaced. He also wanted
to state that he hoped approving a temporary cul-de-sac that any development on the
property would automatically be approved.
Krier apologized to Chums for not being notified, but they sent notices to the same
addresses listed as the City uses to give notices out. He commented that one of the
requirements of Staff was to provide a private road to the property for access, and
provide an easement to the Marshalls on that private road to get access. He said the
temporary sign will look very similar to a regular street sign.
Ismail asked about the sign for the project on the south side. Krier replied that it is
4 feet by 6 feet wide.
Clinton noted that each project must be reviewed and approved on it's own merit, and
they are not rubber stamped. He said that he supports the project.
Ismail commented that he thinks it's a very nice plan and he supports it.
Kardell noted that she supports the plan.
Foote noted that he is frustrated with the high-priced single family homes being built.
MOTION 1: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 2: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Builtwell Construction, Inc. for Comprehensive Guide
Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.98
acres based on plans dated March la, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated March 10, 1995. Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 3: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Builtwell Construction, Inc. for Rezoning from Rural to
, RM-6.5 on 4.98 acres based on plans dated March 10, 1995, and subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 10, 1995. Motion carried 7-0-0.
MOTION 4: Bauer moved, seconded by Clinton, to recommend to the City Council
approval of the request of Builtwell Construction, Inc. for Preliminary Plat on 4.9
acres based on plans dated March 10, 1995, and subject to the recommendations of
the Staff Report dated March 10, 1995. .
:rr: c.. -<0
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
March 10, 1995
High Pointe 2nd Addition
Builtwell Construction, Inc.
Nancy Nicklay --representing the Estate of Harry A. Rogers
Northwest Quadrant of the Intersection of Pioneer Trail and
County Road 4, south of the Senior Center
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.98 acres.
2. Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5 on 4.98 acres.
3. Preliminary Plat of 4.9 acres into 16 lots.
1
Y.c.. -7
.. lO
10 If .. ..
CIl.·· .... " •
• 01..' ... ,
Stafr Report
High Pointe 2nd Addition
March 10, 1995
BACKGROUND
This site is guided Low Density Residential for up to 2.5 units per acre or a total of 12 housing
units. The site is currently zoned Rural. The Senior Center occupies the property to the north
and single family homes occupy the property to the west at a net density of 2.3 units per acre.
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE
Since this is a small site, the decision to change the Comprehensive Guide Plan is not a question
of the Comprehensive Guide Plan balance. It is more a question of whether or not the density
as proposed is acceptable in this location given the existing surrounding land uses.
It is not uncommon to find twinhomes adjacent to single family in Eden Prairie. In most of the
cases, the transition between twinhomes and existing single family homes occurs across the rear
lot line. This makes sense because of a separation in traffic, distance between buildings, and
the opportunity to use plant materials and/or berming for screening.
Twinhomes typically develop at a density range of 3.5 to 4 units per acre. The density of this
proposal is 3.2 units per acre on the gross and 3.88 units per acre on the net. The density of
the single family project to the west is 2 units per acre on the gross and 2.3 units per acre on
the net.
When there are changes in densities, the City typically requires a transition. The greater the
degree in density difference, the greater the degree of transition required. In this case, the
difference in density on a net basis is approximately 1.5 units per acre. Transitions required for
similar situations in Eden Prairie have been a minimum separation between buildings of 100 feet,
and plantings and/or berming along the common property line. In this situation, there is a 100
foot setback between structures and landscaping proposed along the common property line. The
use of single story twinhomes with a walkout height of 34 feet helps with the transition. These
units are shorter than the 2 story walkout single family homes on the west side of the project
which are about 50 feet at the walkout elevation.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The preliminary plat depicts the subdivision of 4.98 acres into 16 twinhome lots at a density of
3.2 units per gross acre. Lot size variances are required for each of the twinhome units. Lot
size variances in the twinhome projects are typical.
The project meets the required 25 foot separation between buildings and adequate parking is
provided to meet City code.
Ye... -9
Staff Report
High Pointe 2nd Addition
March 10, 1995
IMPACT ON THE MARSHALL PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
City staff and the developers met with the landowners to the south approximately two weeks ago
to present the current development plans and to understand the concerns before proceeding with
the preparation of final drawings for commission review. The property owners to the south are
impacted by the decisions made by the Planning Commission and City Council regarding land
use and access. Approval of this site for twinhomes with a private road will set the stage for
continuation of a private road and additional twinhomes on the property to the south. The
property owners to the south are comfortable with the twinhome project provided that a cross-
access easement be provided for use of the private road and that the storm water drainage system
be large enough to accommodate the future drainage from the property.
GRADING
This site is relatively level and contains no significant trees. The property will be graded to
provide positive drainage away from each of the units and directed towards a pretreatment pond
in the northwest corner of the property.
BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
The RM-6.5 Zoning District does not have an exterior materials requirement.
LANDSCAPING
The amount of landscaping required is based upon the total gross building square footage,
including garages, and transition to the single family areas to the west. The caliper inch
requirement would be 202 inches. To create a better transition between the twinhomes and the
single family homes, staff would suggest relocating 10 trees to the west property line.
STORM WATER RUNOFF
Storm water runoff flows in a northwesterly direction through a pretreatment pond. Water from
the pretreatment pond drains by overland swale through a City park to a pond on the northwest
side of the Senior Center. This water eventually flows into Red Rock Lake. There are existing
drainage problems in the City Park property around the tennis courts. Water from the
pretreatment pond will flow through this area and make this condition worse. The City and the
developer are studying ways in which the storm water can be handled differently to eliminate
this situation.
Y.c.. -10
Stafr Report
High Pointe 2nd Addition
March 10, 1995
SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
The Parks and Recreation staff is recommending that a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk be
constructed along the private road into City Park property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Community Development staff presents the following alternative courses of action for
Commission consideration.
I. If the Planning Commission believes that compelling reasons have been provided
for change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential and that the impacts on the surrounding land uses are
low and are mitigated, then one option would be to recommend approval of the
plans as submitted based on the following conditions:
1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall:
A. Modify the landscape plan to relocate 10 trees to the western
boundary line.
B. Modify the site plan to show a sidewalk.
2. Prior to final plat approval, proponent shall submit detailed storm water
runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer.
3. Prior to final plat approval, developer shall submit detailed storm water
runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed
District.
4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Provide a final landscape plan and security amount for review and
approval by the City staff.
-sr.~.-1\
Stafr Report
High Pointe 2nd Addition
March 10, 1995
5. The proponent shall apply for and receive approval of variances for lot
size less than 6,500 square feet in the RM-6.5 Zoning District.
II. If the Planning Commission feels that compelling reasons have not been provided
for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan and that the impacts on the
surrounding land uses are high and have not been mitigated, then one option
would be to return the plans to the proponent and direct revisions to the plan to
either change the land use, lower the density, or provide a better visual transition.
The Community Development staff would recommend Alternative I.
March 2, 1995
Mr. Chris Enger
City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
Dear Mr. Enger:
Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering Co.
8300 Norman Center Drive
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55437
832-2600
Legal Advisor: Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman
3300 Piper Jaffray Tower
222 South Ninth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
333-4800
The engineering advisors to the Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek
Watershed District have reviewed the preliminary plans as submitted to the District for the High
Point 2nd Addition in Eden Prairie. The following policies and criteria of the District are
applicable for this project:
1. In accordance with Section E(2) of the District's revised rules and regulations, a
grading and land alteration permit from the District is required. A detailed grading
plan showing both existing and proposed contours must be submitted to the District for
review.
2. A detailed erosion control plan outlining procedures to control sedimentation from
leaving areas altered on the site must be submitted to the District for review and
approval.
3. A stormwater management plan for the project must be submitted for review and
approval. Stormwater from the site must be directed into a water quality basin, design
to meet N.U.R.P. criteria prior to reaching Protected Waters and/or wetland areas.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this development at an early date. If you
have any questions or request additional information, please give me a call at 832-2857.
Sincerely,
~--
'.~,
ert . Obel1lleyer
Barr Engineering Company
Engineer's for the District
RCO/mst
c: Ray Haik
Fritz Rahr
88\2327053\23489_1 7.c... -13
HennePJD County
Mike Franzen, Senior Planner
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
RE: Proposed Plat -High Point Second Addition
CSAH 4, west side approximately 330 feet north of CSAH 1
Section 20, Township 116, Range 22
Hennepin County Plat No. 2216
Review and Recommendations
Dear Mr. Franzen:
March 2, 1995
Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County
review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat
and make the following comments:
• The proposed plat is within the construction limits of Hennepin County
project No. 9016. This project is scheduled for construction in 1996.
The project design engineer is Dave Schmidt, P.E. Mr. Schmidt can be
reached at 930-2532 and should be contacted for project information and
project coordination.
• The proposed plat identifies CSAH 4 as a Collector street. This does
not agree with Hennepin County's functional classification of CSAH 4.
Hennepin County classifies CSAH 4 as a Minor Arterial. The developer
should design and develop the plat consistent with the minor arterial
classification of CSAH 4 .
• The developer should dedicate the right of way needed for Project 9016
that abuts the proposed plat. The developer should contact Mr. Schmidt
to coordinate the right of way with the proposed plat.
• The location of the proposed City street (Sutton Drive), located
approximately at the north limits of the proposed plat, is acceptable.
The Sutton Drive access can not be constructed until CSAH 4 is
reconstructed. It's our understanding the proposed development will use
the existing Senior Center drive until the new reconstructed CSAH 4
Sutton Drive intersection is completed. Following construction of this
intersection, access for the Senior Center will be via Sutton Drive and
the existing Senior Center access to CSAH 4 will be removed.
Department of Public Works
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468
(612) 930-2670 FAX:(612) 930-2513 TDD:(612) 930-2696
Vc...-lti
Recycled Paper
Mike Franzen
March 2, 1995
Page 2
• All access from the plat to CSAH 4 must be via the proposed City street
system. Hennepin County will not permit any driveway access to CSAH 4.
• Development plans show a proposed NURP pond in the plat's southeast
corner with overflow from the pond flowing east onto CSAH 4 right of way
then south along CSAH 4 approximately 260 feet to an existing cross
culvert. This proposed drainage plan may not be acceptable and must be
reviewed in detail by the County to insure compatibility with the CSAH 4
project. The developer should submit a detailed drainage plan, with
proposed run off rates, for further review.
• All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved
Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes,
but is not limited to access drainage and utility construction, trail
development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for
the appropriate permit forms.
• The developer must restore all areas, within County right of way,
disturbed during construction.
Please direct any response to Doug Mattson.
Sincerely,
Thomas D. ohnson, P.E.
Transportation Planning Engineer
TDJ/DBM
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities
FROM: Stuart A. FO~ger of Parks and Natural Resources
DATE: March 16, 1995
SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report to the March 10, 1995 Community Development Staff
Report for High Point Second Addition AKA Sutton Addition
RECOMMENDATION:
The Parks, Recreation and Facilities staff recommends approval of this project based on the
March 10, 1995 Community Development Staff Report and this supplemental memorandum.
BACKGROUND:
This site is 4.9 acres in size and is owned by Nancy Nicklay, representing the Estate of Harry
A. Rogers. The development applicant is Buildwell Construction, Inc. and they are requesting
platting of the 4.9 acres into 16 lots, which would be used for multiple development twinhomes.
ISSUES:
Tree Preservation
This site has no significant trees on it, because it is former farm field. There are some small
elms and boxelders in the northwest corner of the site; however, these do not qualify for
mitigation under the City's ordinance for tree preservation.
The proposed development is multiple family and the grounds would be managed by an
association. The proponent has included a rather substantial landscaping plan to thoroughly
landscape the entire site. The landscape plan includes the use of deciduous and coniferous
materials, including sugar maple, juneberry, bur oak, Scotch pine, and American basswood.
This plan does meet the landscape screening requirements for multiple family units.
Storm Water Treatment
The proponent is required to follow all Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District regulations
and submit a detailed plan to the Engineering Department prior to final plat approval. The
storm water runoff from this site is proposed to be channeled into a NURP pond in the northwest
"
corner of the site. This pond is being proposed to handle the storm water runoff from this site,
as well as the undeveloped property to the south. The overflow would go north into the City
park and eventually be channeled into the storm water holding pond on the Pioneer Park
property. There is no designation as to whether or not this NURP pond would be enclosed in
an outlot, however, the City does have access to clean out and maintenance of the outflow
structure via the City park on the northerly boundary.
The City staff is currently working on a plan to minimize the impact that the outflow of this
NURP pond would have on park property.
SIDEWALK AND TRAIL ISSUES:
The proponent has requested use of temporary access to their site via the entrance road into the
Senior Center, directly north of their proposed roadway. This project would not have a public
road access point until the upgrading of County Road 4 in the summer of 1996. At the time of
upgrade, the developer would construct the public street known as Sutton Drive. This public
roadway would be configured in such a manner that the public would access to the front and rear
of the Senior Center from a public street. In addition, a sidewalk would be constructed along
the northerly side of the street to accommodate pedestrian traffic crossing Eden Prairie Road
from the east side in the Pioneer Ridge Second Addition development and from the trail along
County Road 4.
The existing 8' bituminous trail along the easterly side of this proposed project would be subject
to the upgrade plans for Eden Prairie Road and would be reconstructed following upgrade by
the County.
No sidewalk or trail connection is proposed for private interior street.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission approved this project as per the Staff Report dated March 10,1995
at its March 13, 1995 meeting. The staff would recommend that the Parks, Recreation and
Natural Resources Commission also approve this project based on the Community Development
Staff Report and this supplemental report.
Sutton/Stuart
DATE: I
e~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .. ~liI~ APRIL 4, 1995 SECTION:
DEP ARTME.'IT: ITEM DESClUPTION: ITEM: NO.
FINANCE VEPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VI
CHECKS NUMBER 29585 THRU 29926
Action/Direction:
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29585 CITY OF RICHFIELD MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION & EXCISE TAX.
29586 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO MARCH 95 DISABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUM.
29587 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29588 CARVER COUNTY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SV PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29589 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PAYROLL 03-03-95 SAVINGS BONDS.
29590 GREAT~EST LIFE & ANNUITY PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29591 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29592 HENN CTY SUPPORT & COLLECTION SVC PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29593 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29594 MN DEPT OF REVENUE PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29595 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29596 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29597 MN TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNION PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29598 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA APRIL 95 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM.
29599 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29600 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-PERA PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29601 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO MARCH 95 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM.
29602 UNITED WAY PAYROLL 03-03-95.
29603 U S WEST COMM SERVICES INC SERVICE-POLICE DEPT.
29604 US WEST CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE-WATER DEPT.
29605 MFEA CONFERENCE-ADAPTIVE RECREATION DEPT.
29606 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC CONFERENCE-STREET MAINTENANCE.
29601 PROTEX INTL CORP COUNTERFEIT DETECTOR PENS-POLICE DEPT.
29608 SUPERIOR FORD INC 1/2 TON PICKUP-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
29609 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID.
29610 JIM RICHARDSON PICTURE FRAMING-CITY HALL.
29611 JEANETTE GUNDERSON REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS.
29612 PATRICK FINNEGAN REFUND-FISHING LESSONS.
29613 MARCIA KOLH REFUND-TAE KWON DO CLASSES.
29614 MICHELLE ROHAN REFUND-MEMBERSHIP FEE.
29615 RICHARD ZAWACKI REFUND-FISHING LESSONS.
29616 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-VALUATION NOTICES-ASSESSING DEPT.
29617 USPCA REGION 12 SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT.
29618 MN CRIME PREVENTION ASSN SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT.
29619 CALIBER PRESS SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT.
29620 BROOKLYN PK TACTICAL OFF ASSN SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT.
29621 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE.
29622 KELI CHANEY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS.
29623 LISA SIELING REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS.
29624 JIM & JACKIE TORNOE REFUND-EAGLE VICWING TRIP-OUTDOOR CENTER
PROGRAM.
29625 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT UNI PAYROLL 03-17-95.
29626 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A PAYROLL 03-19-95.
29627 CIRCUS PIZZA TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/
FEES PAID.
29628 BRUNSWICK LANES TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/
FEES PAID.
29629 CHASKA COMMUNITY CENTER TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/
FEES PAID.
29630 CIRCUS PIZZA TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/
FEES PAID.
19613602
APRIL 4, 1995 1 •
840.94
2146.46
49.37
276.93
400.00
8118.50
240.46
298.00
3639.42
227.42
167.00
1086.50
25.00
237.00
40992.60
8643.93
2952.78
157.75
130.00
357.85
65.00
150.00
105.50
12519.00
248.00
135.00
18.00
10.00
29.00
121.23
5.00
5167.04
135.00
100.00
179.00
40.00
18979.53
12.00
6.00
30.00
700.00
85605.92
258.80
111.44
158.85
258.80
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29631 SPORTS SPREE PARK TICKETS-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 405.00
FEES PAID.
29632 SUBWAY SANDWICHES EXPENSES-SPECIAL TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/ 85.00
FEES PAID.
29633 TARGET CENTER TICKETS-DISNEY ON ICE-ADULT PROGRAM/FEES 726.00
PAID.
29634 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT. 818.12
29635 BELLBOY CORPORATION MIX. 104.30
29636 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 9612.15
29637 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO BEER. 15375.75
29638 LEHMANN FARMS MIX. 144.00
29639 MARK VII DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 10237.90
29640 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO MIX. 553.58
29641 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY MIX. 343.34
29642 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY BEER. 19209.90
29643 U S POSTMASTER POSTAGE-POSTAGE METER-CITY HALL. 8000.00
29644 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSION SIGNATURE FILING 25.00
FEE-POLICE DEPT.
29645 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO SERVICE. 10946.42
29646 NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA CONFERENCE-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 15.00
29647 DELL ORA COLEMAN FINAL PAYMENT-CRESTWOOD PARK LAND 38425.00
ACQUISITION.
29648-RITZ CAMERA FILM/FILM PROCESSING-PARK MAINTENANCE/ 34.12
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
29649 GREENTREE GRAPHIC PRODUCTS SIGNS-FIRE DEPT. 188.25
29650 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT. 189.00
29651 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICE CONFERENCE-SAFETY DEPT. 159.00
29652 STACY LAWIN SERVICE-SKATING RINK ATTENDANT/FEES PAID. 149.45
29653 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. 354.05
29654 KRAEMERS HOME CENTER PULLEYS/CLIPS/NOZZLES/HOSE ADAPTERS/PLUGS/ 941.57
GASKETS/DUCT TAPE/DOOR LATCH/PAINT/DRILL
BITS/SUET/MICE POISON/BIRD SEED/PLUNGER/
FUNNELS/BLADES/SPACKLE/SCRSWS/NUTS &
BOLTS/WASHERS/SCREWDRIVERS/WRENCHES/FUSE
PULLER/PLIERS SET/ANTIFREEZE/BATTERIES/
BULBS/FITTINGS/VALVES/BUCKET/CLAMPS/
CONCRETE PATCH/SCRAPER-FIRE DEPT/STREET
DEPT/EQUIPMENT MAINT/OUTDOOR CENTER/CITY
CENTER/SENIOR CENTER/UTILITIES DIVISION.
29655 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE. 5560.96
29656 THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA CONFERENCE-RECREATION ADMINISTRATION DEPT. 310.04
29657 YOUNG AUDIENCES OF MINNESOTA ENTERTAINMENT-HISTORICAL & CULTURAL 250.00
COMMISSION.
29658 MINNCOMM PAGING FEBRUARY & MARCH PAGER SERVICE-BLDG 162.36
INSPECTIONS DEPT/UTILITIES DIVISION.
29659 LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE-FIRE DEPT. 249.00
29660 WATERPRO COMMERCIAL METER UPGRADE/REGISTERS-WATER 6173.00
DEPT.
29661 JASON-NORTHCO L P #1 APRIL 95 RENT-LIQUOR STORE I. 5197.00
29662 RAMADA INN SCHOOL LODGING-POLICE DEPT. 53.90
13499816
APRIL 4, 1995 2.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29663 BRENT DUPONT SCHOOL ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT. 50.00
29664 DENNIS PAULSON SCHOOL ADVANCE-POLICE DEPT. 50.00
29665 PETTY CASH EXPENSES-CITY HALL/SENIOR CENTER/STREET 58.72
DEPT/UTILITIES ,DIVISION.
29666 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING DEFENSIVE DRIVING INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID. 224.00
29667 MINNESOTA UC FUND 4TH QTR 94 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION. 106.78
29668 NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION-ADMINISTRATION DEPT. 28.62
29669 GTE DIRECTORIES ADVERTISING-LIQUOR STORES. 48.10
29670 BARBARA ANN WINTER RETURN OF CONFISCATED PROPERTY-POLICE 99.94
FORFEITURE-DRUGS.
29671 MICHELE HASTINGS REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00
29672 JANET JANISZEIWSKI REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00
29673 JAN LUKER REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 9.00
29674 JOANNE MANLOVE REFUND-SPRING SALAD LUNCHEON-SENIOR 8.00
PROGRAMS.
29675 VANITA SHAH REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 15.00
29676 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING CO CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY 280.75
CENTER.
29677 SQUARE CUT PARTIAL PAYMENT-CUSTOM BUILT CABINETS-750.00
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29678 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION MEETING EXPENSES-CITY COUNCIL/ 247.39
ADMINISTRATION DEPT.
2967"9-SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MEETING EXPENSES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT. 905.90
29680 SAHI L AGRIWJAL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00
29681 LAURIE CAMPBELL REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 21.00
29682 SHARON LENDT REFUND-STANDARD FIRST AID LESSONS. 25.00
29683 COLEEN MEIDINGER REFUND-AQUA AEROBICS LESSONS. 24.00
29684 MIKE MORIARITY REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 24.00
29685 JOY SHEEHAN REFUND-SWIMMING LESSONS. 3.00
29686 A U S COMMUNICATIONS INC INSTALLATION OF PHONE IN ELEVATOR ROOM/ 2167.88
POOL AREA & COURTESY PHONE-COMMUNITY
CENTER.
29687 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER LOG SPLITTER RENTAL-PARK MAINTENANCE. 182.41
29688 ABBOTT OFFICE SYSTEMS WALL UNIT ORGANIZER~ATER DEPT. 341.72
29689 ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICE-FINANCE DEPT. 1120.00
29690 AFFIRMED MEDICAL SERVICES INC FIRST AID SUPPLIES-CITY HALL. 61.70
29691 AIRLIFT DOORS INC RESET LIMITS ON ZAMBONI ROOM ROLLING 44.00
-I STEEL DOOR-COMMUNITY CENTER.
29692 RAY ALLEN MFG CO INC AGITATION MUZZLE/PET CANTEEN/SIGNS/ 1541.16
TRAINING SUIT-$1295/TRACKING HARNESS-
CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT.
29693 AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNESOTA 1ST QUARTER 95 PAGER SERVICE-FACILITIES 175L40
DEPT/POLICE DEPT/HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT/
FIRE DEPT/STREET MAINTENANCE/PARK
MAINTENANCE.
29694 AMERICAN RED CROSS VIDEOS/BABY UPGRADE KIT/TEXTBOOKS/WATER 500.16
SAFETY & CPR/FIRST AID PARTICIPANT FEES-
POOL LESSONS.
29695 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC PUBLICATIONS~ATER DEPT. 64.20
29696 EARL F ANDERSEN & ASSOC INC PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT & INSTALLATION-13714.00
PIONEER PARK.
2454283
APRIL 4, 1995 3.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29697 ANIMAL INN BOARDING KENNEL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 29.82
29698 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING-CITYS SHARE OF ARLE CONTACTS/ 239.63
SPRING 95-ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM.
29699 APOLLO ELEVATOR COMPANY ELEVATOR REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER. 78.00
29700 JOE APT SERVICE-TAL CHI INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR 180.00
PROGRAMS/FEES PAID.
29701 ARMOR SECURITY INC 2ND QTR 95 SECURITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-165.18
OUTDOOR CENTER.
29702 APCO INC DUES-POLICE DEPT. 62.00
29703 B & STOOLS PLIERS/SCREWDRIVERS/WIRE STRIPPERS/ 310.29
BATTERY/SIDE CUTTERS/EXTRACTOR SET-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/WATER DEPT.
29704 BACONS ELECTRIC CO REPAIR LIMIT SWITCH ON HIGH SERVICE PUMP 21084.00
CHECK VALVE/WATER PLANT LIGHTING RETROFIT-
UTILITIES DIVISION.
29705 THE BAG MAN CAMOFLAUGE BAG-POLICE DEPT. 159.75
29706 S H BARTLETT CO INC REPAIR KITS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 216.48
29707 BEACON BALLFIELDS BASE ANCHORS/STAKES/PITCHER PLATES/HOME 2854.68
PLATES-STARING LAKE PARK.
29708 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC EDGER BLADE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 53.58
29709 BELLBOY CORPORATION SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 778.84
29710 PATRICIA BESSER SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 595.00
2971 r BEST COPIERS OF MINNESOTA COPIER-STREET DEPT. 1552.18
29712 BLACK & VEATCH SERVICE-WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION. 10661.62
29713 BLEVINS CONCESSION SUPPLY COMPANY CONCESSION STAND SUPPLIES-COMMUNITY 1393.95
CENTER.
29714 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON FEBRUARY 95 KENNEL COSTS-ANIMAL CONTROL 253.00
DEPT.
29715 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE CO REPLACED LOCK SET.-WATER DEPT/PUBLIC WORKS 565.47
BLDG.
29716 PAUL BROWN SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 561.00
29717 NATHAN BUCK SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 229.50
29718 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT. 113.66
29719 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM PROGRAMMING REPAIR/UNDER HELMET 10992.33
HEADSETS/CABLES/INTERFACE MODULES/DUAL
CONTROL ADAPTERS & INSTALLATION-FIRE DEPT/
APRIL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-POLICE DEPT.
29720 CARGILL SALT DIVISION DEICING SALT-SNOW & ICE CONTROL-STREET 1688.73
DEPT.
29721 JIM CARLSON LEASING CO VEHICLE LEASING-POLICE DEPT. 4920.00
29722 CEDAR COMPUTER CENTER INC COMPUTER/SOFTWARE/MONITOR/AUTO SWITCH BOX/ 4447.45
CABLES-$2700-ENGINEERING DEPT/LASERJET
PRINTER/TRAY-$1734-POLICE FORFEITURE-
DRUGS.
29723 CENTRAIRE INC REPLACED HEATING UNIT FILTERS AND 2684.80
PERFORMED MAINTENANCE ON HEATING UNITS-
FACILITIES DEPT/LIQUOR STORES
29724 CHANHASSEN LAWN & SPORTS SAW CHAIN-PARK MAINTENANCE. 31.95
29725 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS GLOVES/HEADSET/-WATER DEPT/BACK SUPPORTS-196.69
SAFETY DEPT.
6709958
APRIL 4, 1995 4.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29726 CONTECH CONST PRODUCTS INC CULVERTS-STORM DRAINAGE DEPT. 162.31
29727 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIP INC SAFETY CABINET FOR FLMMABLE LIQUIDS-431.79
POLICE DEPT.
29728 COpy EQUIPMENT INC OFFICE SUPPLIES-ENGINEERING DEPT. 38.34
29729 CRYSTEEL DIST INC STORAGE BOX/BULKHEAD-EQUIPMENT 389.79
MAINTENANCE.
29730 HARLEY CURRIER MEETING EXPENSES-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT. 28.02
29731 CURTAIN CALL COSTUMES ICE SHOW COSTUMES-COMMUNITY CENTER. 2576.10
29732 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC SCREWDRIVERS/WASHERS/SEALS-EQUIPMENT 295.07
MAINTENANCE.
29733 CUTLER MAGNER COMPANY QUICKLIME-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 6596.11
29734 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT/WATER 112.83
TREATMENT PLANT.
29735 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO HELMETS/FACESHIELDS-FIRE DEPT. 603.00
29736 DANYS TAILOR UNIFORM TAILORING-POLICE DEPT. 16.40
29737 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SVCS INC CORROSION PREVENTIVE/RUSTPOOFING-170.40
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29738 DEFENSIVE TRAINING PRODUCTIONS TRAINING SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 140.50
29739 JAMES G DEMANN SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT. 35.00
29740 GARY DIETHELM SERVICE-GRAVE PREPARATION-PLEASANT HILLS 180.00
CEMETERY.
29741 DYNA SYSTEMS NEEDLE VALVES~ATER DEPT. 62.64
2974Z EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY JANUARY/FEBRUARY COPIER MAINTENANCE 477.92
AGREEMENT-CITY HALL.
29743 THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC SUBSCRIPTION-WATER DEPT. 24.02
29744 E P APPLIANCE SERVICE TIMER KNOB/INLET HOSES-SEWER DEPT. 22.21
29745 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSES-MARCH CHAMBER LUNCHEON-97.00
CITY HALL.
29746 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DIST 272 BUS SERVICE-ACCESSIBLITY PROGRAM/SPECIAL 205.27
TRIPS & EVENTS PROGRAM/CHILD CARE SERVICE-
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT.
29747 CITY OF EDINA FEBRUARY 95 WATER TESTS~ATER DEPT. 170.00
29748 ELECTRIC MECHANICAL SVCS VIBRATION METER~ATER DEPT. 266.25
29749 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC NITROGEN DIOXIDE & CARBON MONOXIDE 487.62
DETECTOR TUBES/CALIBRATION GAS LITER
CYLINDER-SEWER DEPT.
29750 REBECCA ENGER SERVICE-COMPUTER INSTRUCTOR/FEES PAID. 15.00
29751 ENGINEERING NEWS-RECORD SUBSCRIPTION-ENGINEERING DEPT. 69.00
29752 RON ESS SERVICE-HOCKEY OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 150.00
29753 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE-CITY HALL. 14.77
29754 FEED RITE CONTROLS INC CHLORINE~ATER TREATMENT PLANT. 1687.10
29755 FIBRCOM INSTALLATION OF 911 CENTER CONNECTION 42156.96
BETWEEN CITY CENTER & TRANSMITTER SITE-
POLICE DEPT.
29756 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES-POLICE DEPT. 325.23
29757 GE CAPITAL COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT-SENIOR CENTER. 134.75
29758 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO OFFICE SUPPLIES~ATER DEPT. 727.67
29759 GETTMAN COMPANY SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORE I. 59.55
29760 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC COMPRESSOR RECLAIMED REFRIGERANT REPLACED/ 295.12
VALVED OFF & TAGGED COMPRESSOR VALVES &
ELECTRICAL CONTROLS-COMMUNITY CENTER.
5922374
APRIL 4, 1995 5.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29761 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY PUMP RENTAL-STREET MAINTENANCE. 63.90
29762 W W GOETSCH ASSOC INC O-RINGS/GASKETS/RETAINING RINGS/COUPLING 677 .24
SLEEVES/LANTERN RINGS/SHIMS~ATER DEPT.
29763 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SVC TIRES/TUBES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 3517.67
29764 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC SERVICE-UTILITIES DIVISION. 14.00
29765 W W GRAINGER INC GRAB BAR/DELINEATOR POST/WARNING FLAGS-249.00
COMMUNITY CENTER/GRAVITY CONVEYOR-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29766 MARVIN GREENSTEIN APPRAISAL SERVICE-PHILIP HILL LAND 405.66
ACQUISITION.
29767 HARMON CONTRACT GLAZING INC REPLACED VESTIBULE DOORS BACKER PLATES-122.41
COMMUNITY CENTER.
29768 JOHN W HARRIGAN APPRAISAL SERVICE-PHILIP HILL LAND 205.96
ACQUISITION.
29769 HELICOPTER FLIGHT INC SERVICE-DEER SURVEY-FORESTRY DEPT. 656.54
29770 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROPERTY OWNERS MAILING LABELS-COMMUNITY 207.50
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
29771 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS FILING FEES-ENGINEERING DEPT. 277 .00
29772 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF FEBRUARY 95 BOOKING FEE-POLICE DEPT. 1522.42
29773 D C HEY COMPANY INC COPIER REPAIR~ATER DEPT/COPIER 153.64
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-FIRE DEPT.
29774 HOFFERS INC TUBE MIRROR-COMMUNITY CENTER. 109.75
29775 HONEYWELL PROTECTION SERVICES REPAIRED BROKEN WIRE-SENIOR CENTER. 60.00
29776 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC PRINTING-COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER-COMMUNITY 3332.18
SERVICES DEPT.
29777 ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMERICA SHOW ENDORSEMENT FEE-COMMUNITY CENTER. 15.00
29778 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC FLUORESCENT LIGHT BULBS-WATER DEPT. 141.29
29779 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC ELEMENTS/FILTER KITS-EQUIPMENT 733.55
MAINTENANCE.
29780 BRENDA JERDE SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 153.00
29781 JOEL ENTERPRISES HOSES-WATER DEPT. 28.12
29782 E F JOHNSON CO PORTABLE RADIO BATTERIES-POLICE DEPT/ 20927.84
MODIFICATION OF FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO MEET
ADA REQUIREMENTS-COMMUNITY CENTER.
29783 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES SHAFT BEARING/SLEEVE & SEAL~ATER DEPT. 46.38
29784 KANDIYOHI BOTTLED WATER CO SPRING WATER/COOLER RENTAL-LIQUOR STORE 19.17
III.
29785 J J KELLER & ASSOC INC SUBSCRIPTION~ATER DEPT. 62.36
29786 JJ KELLER & ASSOC INC OSHA COMPLIANCE MANUAL SUBSCRIPTION~ATER 218.01
DEPT.
29787 PAM KLOOS SUPPLIES-KIDS KORNER PROGRAM. 15.80
29788 KNOX LUMBER LUMBER/TREATED TIMBERS-PARK MAINTENANCE. 542.84
29789 JILL KUYAVA SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 136.00
29790 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY BOTTLES~ATER DEPT. 33.43
29791 LAKE REGION VENDING SUPPLIES-LIQUOR STORES. 1650.08
29792 LAKESIDE FUSEE CORP FUSEES-POLICE DEPT. 874.52
29793 LANG PAULY & GREGERSON LTD FEBRUARY 95 PROSECUTION SERVICE-POLICE 7984.30
DEPT.
29794 ALLEN R LARSON SCHOOL-POLICE DEPT. 193.32
29795 GREG LARSON SPORTS INC GAME RACKETS-RACQUETBALL COURT-COMMUNITY 141.58
CENTER/THROW & SUCTION SET-AFTERNOON
PLAYGROUND PROGRAM.
4549146
APRIL 4, 1995 6.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29796 C E LASALLE & ASSOCIATES APPRAISAL SERVICE-PHILIP HILL LAND 3650.00
ACQUISTION.
29797 LEANNS SEWING/CUSTOM DECORAT FIRE GEAR REPAIR-FIRE DEPT. 22.00
29798 L LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES INC FEBRUARY 95 SERVICE-FLYING CLOUD LANDFILL. 5983.35
29799 KEN LEWIS APPRAISERS INC APPRAISAL SERVICE-PHILIP HILL LAND 600.00
ACQUISITION.
29800 LITTfiE FALLS MACHINE INC PLOW BUSHINGS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 178.47
29801 LOGIS JANUARY 95 SERVICE. 39227.70
29802 STEVE LUCAS PHOTOGRAPHY PRINTS-CITY COUNCIL. 76.68
29803 LUNDQUIST WILLMAR POTVIN & BENDER CONSULTING SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER 1542.00
NATATORIUM.
29804 LUSIAN ELECTRIC COOLER REPAIR-LIQUOR STORE I. 615.91
29805 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC HOSE ASSEMBLY/SHEAR PINS/CONTROL KNOB/ 3489.23
HOPPER TILT CYLINDER & PARTS/SWEEPER
PARTS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29806 PAULETTE MARINI SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR/FEES 78.00
PAID.
29807 MASTER CRAFT LABELS INC JUNIOR BADGES-POLICE DEPT. 292.88
29808 MASUEN COMPANY BASKET STRETCHER-WATER DEPT. 292.70
29809 MATTS AUTO SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICE-POLICE DEPT .. 55.00
29810 MCQUIRE MECHANICAL SVCS REFUND-OVERPAYMENT PLUMBING PERMIT. 39.00
29811 MEMINDEX OFFICE SUPPLIES~ATER DEPT. 81.05
29812 MENARDS CABINET HARDWARE/LUMBER/SUPPORT CLIPS & 731.76
STRIPS/OUTLET CONNECTION/MEGARACKS/TOGGLE
BOLTS/PLASTE~ALL ANCHORS/MOTAR MIX/
SCREWS/SHOWER CURTAIN RINGS/HOSES/HINGES/
STUDS/SUCTION CUPS/STAPLES/GLOVES/TREATED
TIMBERS/CEDAR SIDING.
29813 METRO SYSTEMS FILE COMPRESSORS-FINANCE DEPT. 639.00
29814 SHERI MEULEBROECK EXPENSES-AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM. 28.56
29815 JANET MEYER SERVICE-PHOTO MGMT WORKSHOP INSTRUCTOR/ 15.00
FEES PAID.
29816 MICROBILT PRINTER PHONE~ATER DEPT. 63.90
29817 MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC PRESSURE WASHER PARTS-FIRE DEPT. 149.51
29818 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP WASTE DISPOSAL~ATER DEP. 15.61
29819 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT. 1776.03
29820 HERMAN MILLER INC UTILITY TRAY/TASK LIGHTS-ENGINEERING DEPT. 119.10
29821 MINNEAPOLIS EQUIPMENT CO FUEL COCK-SEWER DEPT. 18.13
29822 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS BUSINESS CARDS/FORMS-CITY HALL/COMMUNITY 493.30
CENTER.
29823 MN CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY ION DETECTOR BATTERY BACKUP-FIRE DEPT. 27.80
29824 MINNESOTA. SUN PUBLICATIONS EMPLOYMENT ADS-PARKS DEPT/PUBLIC WORKS 225.75
DEPT.
29825 MN VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC LAB RABIES EXAM-ANIMAL CONTROL DEPT. 15.00
29826 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING-RECEIPTS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 99.74
29827 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC GLASS DISPLAY DOORS WITH LIGHTS & FLAT 8973.10
SHELVES-LIQUOR STORE I.
29828 MTS NORTHWEST SOUND INC FURNISHED & INSTALLED OUTDOOR CAMERA DOME 1911.00
ENCLOSURE-POLICE DEPT.
29829 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO POLY BRUSH-PARK MAINTENANCE. 220.78
7174704
APRIL 4, 1995 7.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29830 WM MUELLER & SONS INC SAND & GRAVEL-STREET DEPT/PARK DEPT/WATER 995.06
DEPT.
29831 MUNITECH INC TESTING OF COMPOUND METER~ATER DEPT. 95.00
29832 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE IN EMPLOYMENT ADS-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 2346.94
29833 NEWSWEEK EDUCATIONAL SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 28.62
29834 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS INC PLASTIC FUEL TANK-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 27.68
29835 NORTHLAND BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS FAX PAPER/INK FILM-CITY HALL. 233.65
29836 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN TYPEWRITER PRINT WHEEL-ENGINEERING DEPT/ 78.78
COMPUTER SOFTWARE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29837 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC LEATHER BELT/NYLON TIES~ATER DEPT. 33.24
29838 PARKS IDE PRINTING INC PRINTING-SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER-SENIOR 619.48
PROGRAMS.
29839 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC WATERMAIN REPAIRS-WATER DEPT. 3387.50
29840 PHONES PLUS HEADSET/CONVERSION KITS/HEADSETS REPAIRED-323.85
SAFETY DEPT.
29841 PNEUMATIC CONTROLS INC SERVICE-TEMPERATURE CONTROLS-COMMUNITY 4778.34
CENTER.
29842 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC T-SHIRTS-ORGANIZED ATHLETICS PROGRAM. 389.89
29843 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY INC REWIRED A/V RACKS RECEPTACLES/REPLACED 2159.36
EMERGENCY LIGHTING/RECONNECTED CLOCK WIRE
CORDS/REPAIRED FIXTURES/REFED DUPLEX
RECEPTACLE/INSTALLED EMERGENCY POWER TO
HERITAGE ROOMS-FACILITIES DEPT/POLICE
DEPT/COMMUNITY CENTER.
29844 PRINTERS SERVICE INC ZAMBONI BLADES SHARPENED-COMMUNITY CENTER. 130.50
29845 JERRY PROOOEHL MEETING EXPENSES-STREET MAINTENANCE. 33.81
29846 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ASSOCIATES SUBSCRIPTION-FIRE DEPT. 48.00
29847 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC COIL CHAIN/SHACKLES/INSTALLED CHAINS ON 420.89
LIFT & PHASE GENERATOR-SEWER DEPT.
29848 QUALITY WASTE C9NTROL INC MARCH 95 WASTE DISPOSAL-WATER TREATMENT 300.39
PLANT/LIQUOR STORE II.
29849 R & R SPECIALTIES INC IMPELLERS/PULLEY/BUSHING KIT/COIL/ 387.07
DISTRIBUTOR-COMMUNITY CENTER.
29850 RADIO SHACK PHONES/AMPLIFIER/CABLES/ADAPTERS~ATER 118.54
DEPT/POLICE DEPT.
29851 RC IDENTIFICATIONS INC POUCHES-PARK PLANNING DEPT. 39.94
29852 CITY OF RICHFIELD CITYS SHARE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE-1166.25
ADAPTIVE RECREATION DEPT.
29853 RICOH CORPORATION APRIL 95 COPIER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-626.86
CITY HALL.
29854 RIEKE-CARROLL-MULLER ASSOC INC SERVICE~ATER TOWER/CITY WEST PKWY CONST 20894.64
SVC/GOLDEN RIDGE ROAD DESIGN/MAPING/
TECHNOLOGY DR SEWER & WATER.
29855 ROLLINS OIL CO OCTANE FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 6209.39
29856 ROOT-O-MATIC SEWER SERVICE SEWER SERVICE-FIRE STATION. 67.50
29857 S & B MFG CO INC ZAMBONI REPAIR/SPARK PLUGS-COMMUNITY 101.18
CENTER.
29858 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC 3 CHAIRS-POLICE DEPT. 1377.88
29859 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY CO OFFICE SUPPLIES-KIDS KORNER PROGRAM/ 75.30
COMMUNITY CENTER.
4749553
APRIL 4, 1995 8.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29860 SANCO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES-FACILITIES DEPT. 689.16
29861 SCHARBER & SONS INC 6X4 GATOR UTILITY VEHICLE/POWER LIFT KIT/ 6472.01
FRONT BUMPER/BEDLINER-SEWER DEPT.
29862 CHUCK SCHAITBERGER MILEAGE-FIRE DEPT .. 53.20
29863 KEVIN SCHMIEG CODE BOOKS-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT. 30.00
29864 CAROL SCHOENHERR FITNESS TAPES-FITNESS CLASSES. 38.40
29865 RON SCHWARTZ SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 212.50
29866 SEARS SAWS/SAW BLADES/BLADE QUIDES-SENIOR 112.34
CENTER.
29867 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY CAUTION SIGNS-WATER DEPT. 216.75
29868 SHAKOPEE VALLEY PRINTING PRINTING-PARK & RECREATION DEPT PROGRAM 5508.72
BROCHURE.
29869 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS INC UNIFORM SWEATER-POLICE DEPT. 41.42
29870 SIGNUM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC REFLECTIVE ROLLS FOR SIGNS/DECALS-83.07
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29871 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO RIBBONS-COMMUNITY CENTER. 110.03
29872 THE SKETCH PAD RETIREMENT PARTY INVITATIONS-511.20
ADMINISTRATION DEPT.
29873 PHILLIP C SMITH APPRAISAL SERVICE-PHILIP HILL LAND 413.94
ACQUISITION.
29874 PETER N SMITH SERVICE-VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL/FEES PAID. 155.50
29875 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION OIL/COUPLERS/RIM TOOL/AIR HAMMERS/ 2196.67
SCREWDRIVERS/LIGHT TORCH/ADAPTER/
SANDPAPER/ENGINE ANALYZER SCANNER-$1940-
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-WATER DEPT.
29876 SNELL MECHANICAL INC POOL AIR HANDLER REPAIR-COMMUNITY CENTER. 147.25
29877 SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT BUS SERVICE-ADULT PROGRAMS. 150.00
29878 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSI 2ND QTR 95 OPERATING BUDGET-CITY HALL. 2739.55
29879 SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS IN FEDERAL & NATIONAL TRAINING GUIDES-903.75
UTILITIES DIVISION.
29880 SQUARE CUT RELOCATED CABINETS-POLICE DEPT. 180.00
29881 STANDARD SPRING COMPANY AUX SINGLE LEAF-EQUIPMENT MAINT. 28.01
29882 STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION-CITY HALL/POLICE DEPT. 171.60
29883 STAR TRIBUNE EARLY SUNDAY PAPERS FOR RESALE-LIQUOR 52.56
STORE III.
29884 STREICHERS PROFESSIONAL POLICE EQ MAGAZINE CLAMP-POLICE DEPT. 132.91
29885 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH INC SERVICE-DELL ROAD/SHORES OF MITCHELL LAKE/ 19405.97
DELL ROAD SOUTH/SCENIC HTS RD/DELL RD TH
212 TO 82ND ST/PRESERVE BLVD & ANDERSON
LKS PKWY.
29886 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FRONT BRAKE ROTORS/MUFFLER/TAIL PIPE/ 266.68
HANGER/BELT UNIT/HOSE-EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE.
29887 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO BEVERAGE 3 DOOR SLIDE MERCHANDISER-LIQUOR 2339.38
STORE II.
29888 SWEDLUND SEPTIC SERVICE SEWER SERVICE-OUTDOOR CENTER. 190.00
29889 TANK RE-NU OF MINNESOTA FUEL TANK REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 269.25
29890 TECHNIQUIE SUBSCRIPTION-HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. 24.95
29891 TOM TESCH SAFETY EYE WEAR-STREET MAINTENANCE. 36.16
29892 THERMOGAS CO OF CHASKA PROPANE CYLINDERS-OUTDOOR CENTER. 236.00
4411893
APRIL 4, 1995 9.
APRIL 4, 1995 VI
29893 LOWELL THONE MEETING EXPENSES-BLDG INSPECTIONS DEPT. 15.00
29894 TIE SYSTEMS INC-MN INSTALLED PROGRAM FOR DICTAPHONE 3192.18
EQUIPMENT-POLICE DEPT/ACTIVATED JACKS IN
HISTORICAL MUSEUM-CITY HALL.
29895 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC LABELING TAPE-POLICE DEPT. 122.79
29896 TKDA & ASSOC INC SERVICE-RECONSTRUCTION OF MUNICIPAL 12489.53
FACILITIES ADJACENT TO MITCHELL RD/LEAK
LOCATING-WATER DEPT.
29897 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 300 AMP HOLDER/SOAPSTONE HOLDER/WELDING 41.94
GLOVES-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
29898 TNEMEC CORPORATION INC PAINT-WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 2049.90
29899 TONKA CYCLE REPLACED GEARS-FITNESS CENTER. 25.92
29900 TOTAL REGISTER SYS CASH REGISTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT-1625.00
LIQUOR STORE I.
29901 TOTAL SERVICE COMPANY STORM WINDOWS/CASEMENT WINDOWS & 1795.50
INSTALLATION-HOUSING REHABILITATION
PROGRAM.
29902 TRACY/TRIPP FUELS DIESEL FUEL-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 5106.80
29903 TRAUT WELLS HIGH SERVICE PUMP REPAIR/PACKING BOX/SET 12079.61
& WIRE MOTOR & HOOK-UP/CLEAN & PAINT/
DISCONNECT PUMP/REBUILT BOXES/PULLED HEAD
NUTS/SET UP PUMP TO WASTE~ATER DEPT.
29904 TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL INC SEALING FLANGES/DISPHRAGMS-SEWER DEPT. 140.58
29905 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS INC INSTALLED ACOUSTICAL WALL PANELS IN 911 209.50
ROOM-POLICE DEPT.
29906 TWIN CITY VACUUM VACUUM CLEANER REPAIR/BAGS-FACILITIES 213.40
DEPT.
29907 U S TENNIS ASSN DUES-YOUTH RECREATION PROGRAMS. 25.00
29908 U S WEST COMM SERVICES INC TRANSMITTER REPAIR/RELOCATION OF 911 21650.59
COMMUNICATION CENTER-POLICE DEPT.
29909 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS-POLICE DEPT/MARIHUANA TEST KITS-955.34
POLICE DEPT.
29910 U S P C A DUES-POLICE DEPT. 30.00
29911 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC DRILL BITS-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. 95.06
29912 URBAN WILDLIFE MGMr INC MARCH 95 DEER REMOVAL SERVICE-FORESTRY 3250.00
DEPT.
29913 VESSCO INC NUTS & BOLTS/SCREWS/CAPS/SCRAPERS/PLATE 584.45
BACKING~ATER DEPT.
29914 TRIA VIKESLAND REIMBURSMENT-4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION. 20.00
29915 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHT BULBS-COMMUNITY CENTER/FACILITIES 537.81
DEPT.
29916 WATER SPECIALTY OF MN-INC LIQUID CHLORINE/CHLORINE NEUTRALIZER/ 779.28
INLET FLAPS-COMMUNITY CENTER.
29917 WATERPRO TOUCH PAD UPGRADES/SPLICING CONNECTOR 2323.47
TOOL/REPAIR CLAMPS/METER ROD SEAL/HYDRANT
MARKERS/TOUCHGUN/ANTENNA/UTILITY
INSULATION/GATE VALVES/SLEEVES/RUBBER
GASKETS/NUTS & BOLTS/CURB BOX COVERS/
SPANNER WRENCHES/RUBBER GASKETS-WATER
DEPT.
6935865
APRIL 4, 1995 10.
APRIL 4, 1995
29918 JOEL WESTACOTT PRODUCTION SVCS
29919 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
29920 WEYERHAEUSER
29921 LOIS N WILDER
29922 WINGS CONNECTION
29923 WOLFF FORDING & CO
29924 X-ERGON
29925 ZACKS INC
29926 ZIEGLER INC
11000 AMERICAN BANK
22000 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
22000 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
22000 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
44000 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE
55000 AMERICANA BANK
28940 VOID OUT CHECK
29486 VOID OUT CHECK
110258110
APRIL 4, 1995
VI
VIDEO SERVICE-COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT.
FUEL ISLAND REPAIR-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE.
RECYCLING SERVICE-COMMUNITY CENTER.
SERVICE-MEMOIR WRITING INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR
PROGRAMS/FEES PAID.
SERVICE-EXERCISE INSTRUCTOR-SENIOR
PROGRAMS/FEES PAID.
ICE SHOW COSTUMES-COMMUNITY CENTER.
CUTOFF WHEELS~ATER DEPT.
RAKES/SCOOPS/HANDLES/VEHICLE BRUSHES/
SCRAPERS-SEWER DEPT.
DRAINED & REPLACED ENGINE ANTIFREEZE/
REPLACED THERMOSTATS/GASKETS/SEALS/
BATTERY CABLES~ATER DEPT.
BOND PAYMENTS.
PAYROLL 02-17-95.
PAYROLL 03-03-95.
PAYROLL 03-17-95.
FEBRUARY 95 SALES TAX.
PETER GEORGE LAND ACQUISITION.
11.
52.50
76.29
5.00
67.50
238.00
149.06
274.97
250.26
1025.23
418381.25
16862.38
16947.77
17226.71
30103.00
601232.66
180.00-
131.48-
$1862793.04
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Petitions, Request and Communications 3-28-95
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Community Development, Placement of US Bus
Chris Enger, Benches in Public Right-OIlL, A.
Michael Franzen, of-Way.
Steve Durham
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
The City Council is requested to take action on the following:
1. Hear US Bench petition to keep bus benches in Public Right-of-way.
2. Take action to direct US Bench to remove bus benches based on City Code.
OVERVIEW:
-In December of 1994 Southwest Metro contacted the City requesting the removal of a bus bench and
sign on a bus bench located at the northwest comer of Anderson Lakes Parkway and Center Way. The
Community Development Division contacted the bus bench owner, US Bench Corp. and requested
removal of the bench from the public right-of-way. Since the initial concern 5 other benches were
identified in the City.
-City Code Chapter 6, Section 6.06 , Subd. 1 entitled "Obstructions in Streets" does not permit any
person to place, deposit, display or offer for sale any fence, poles, lines, goods, or other obstructions
upon, over, across or under any street or other public property without first having obtained a written
permit from the Council etc ...
In additions Subd. 4, of the same section, entitled "Signs and Other Structures" states it is a
misdemeanor for any person to place or maintain a sign advertisement, or other structure in any street
without first having obtained a written permit from the Council except as otherwise permitted by the
City Code.
-US Bench requested a meeting with the City staff and Southwest Metro which occurred on January
10, 1995. At that time US Bench requested permission to keep the benches in their locations until they
could present their case to the City Council. Permission was granted.
-Since the January 10, 1995 meeting staff has canvassed the community and identified 5 locations of
US bus benches with signs in the public right-of-way. One bench is located on private property at the
Eden Prairie Center Park and Ride location.
-21\1 . A. - \
ISSUES:
1. Location of benches in Public Right-of-way. Placement of the bench in the right-of-way is
incongruent with the City Code. No formal permission has been granted by the City Council.
Southwest Metro does not support the US Bench locations in the public right-of-way or at the
designated bus stops for reasons of insurance/liability issues, maintenance issues, and concerns
with advertisement on the benches which may be associated to Southwest Metro.
2. Signs. City code does not permit signs in the public right-of-way. Specifically in Chapter 11,
Section 11.70, Subd. 3, entitled "General Provisions Applicable to All Districts", it states
"sitting facility signs noting the transit operator or service shall be permitted only at transit
stops." The code does not provide a provision for private advertising.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the City Code benches and signs are not permitted in the Public Right-of Way without
permission from the City Council. Permits or a review process for the existing benches has not formally
taken place. Therefore, based on City Code and Southwest Metro's position removal of the benches
would be appropriate.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
• Information submitted by Southwest Metro dated March 27, 1995.
• Information submitted by US Bench Corporation.
• Location Map of benches.
Action/Direction: Direct US Bench to remove all bus benches within City Public right-of-
way. Clarify for US Bench that if benches are located on private property only signs related
to the transit provider are permitted.
barb\steve\usbcc. sd
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Carl J. Jullie, City Manager
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Kate Garwood, Policy & Administration
Diane R. Harberts, Executive Director
SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION
March 27, 1995
BENCHES IN RIGHT-OF-WAY --U. S. BENCH
Several weeks ago, Southwest Metro initiated a zoning complaint against U.S. Bench. The
essence of the complaint was that U. S. Bench had placed five (5) benches in the right-of-way. (A
sixth bench was located on private property within the parking lot of Eden Prairie Center.) After
discussing this with Steve Durham, Zoning Administrator, he informed us of several City Code
provisions supporting our complaint.
In addition to concerns about Code compliance, there are several other concerns these.benches
raise for Southwest Metro. These are:
1. Our policy is that NO advertising be allowed on any of our facilities or buses. We
do not even advertise our own services on our facilities or buses. It is clear that the
benches exist, at least in part, for the purpose of advertising.
2. We received complaints from businesses from two points of view:
We (Southwest Metro) did not allow all businesses a chance to advertise on "our"
benches, and, therefore, were treating some businesses unfairly.
We (Southwest Metro) were allowing the use of "public resources" by private
businesses for advertising purposes. As it is, U. S. Bench is the only party making
a profit from using the public right-of-way.
Businesses are our customers, too. It is important to us that all our customers feel they are
treated in a fair and consistent manner.
3. Related to the two points above, Southwest Metro does not want to become a
sign administrator. In the future, if the Commission believes it would be beneficial to
advertise on our buses and other facilities, staff would recommend that we utilize the
revenues in the same manner as the Metro Council Transit Operations--that is, the revenue
generated from the signs could be used to support operating expenses or reduce fares.
Currently, we do not have the staff time, nor the auditing system necessary to do this.
4. Liability is an issue. Although U. S. Bench has a policy protecting Southwest Metro, we
do not believe it is an adequate amount when compared to recent court decisions for such
cases. We are concerned about the range of possible lawsuits from soiled clothing caused
by a wet or dirty bench, to an injury resulting from the location of the bench.
\llll.A.-3
Carl Jullie
March 27, 1995
Page 2
5. Handicapped access "around" the benches is difficult. The bench placement was not
done in consideration of wheel chairs or lifts which may be needed by some of our riders.
Depending on where the benches are located, access on and off the bus can be challenging
for anyone who is disabled.
6. Several of the benches are not located at transit stops. We have received calls asking
why we do not stop at the locations where a couple of the benches have been placed, for
instance at the two benches located along U. S. Highway 169 where the speed limit is 55
mph. These benches are placed in locations where we do not, and would not, stop because
of the danger it would cause to passengers. At no time have we been consulted about the
location of any of the benches.
7. Maintenance is an issue. We have a contract with a service provider to maintain our
park and ride lots and to keep the bus stop areas clear of debris and snow as needed
Working around benches is difficult, which is one reason we do not have them.
As you can see, this is a complicated issue for us. Because of all the issues, we support the City
Code provisions and request the removal of all these benches.
\llJJ \ A. -Lf
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
IDENTIFIED US BENCH LOCATIONS
Eden Prairie Center (private property).
Anderson Lakes Parkway and Center Way
West 78th Street and Prairie Center Drive
Valley View Road and Highway #169.
Flying Cloud Drive (in front of Wendy's.)
Flying Cloud Drive and Hennepin County VoTech.
'l/ILA.-5'
---i~
tJ
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Petitions, Request and Communications 03-28-95
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Community Development Variance request #95-06
Chris Enger Sign size
VI'I-. B. Michael Franzen
Steve Durham
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
The City Council is requested by Tandem properties to continue the review of Variance Request #95-06
to an unspecified future date.
OVERVIEW:
The City Council Reviewed Variance Request #95-06 at its March 21, 1995 meeting. The Council made
the following action:
1. Review the script portion of the sign request at the April 4, 1995 City Council meeting.
2. Have the Planning Commission review and make a recommendation of the
statuary/symbol/logo portion of the variance request which would return to the City
Council at an undefined date.
STATUS:
A letter from Tandem Properties today request the City Council to postpone the Council review of
variance request #95-06 to an unspecified date.
In a phone conversation with Jim Ostensen on March 28, 1995 it was discussed that the script portion
of the sign "The Big Woods, A Historic Forest" would be designed to meet the City Code requirements
of 32 sq. ft.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
• Letter from Tandem Properties dated March 28, 1995.
ActionlDirection: The City Council continue the requested review of variance request #95-
06. The Council may want to include a time frame to which the applicant must have a
redesigned plan.
VIII. 8.-1
TANDEM James L. Ostenson
PRO PER TIE S ____ ...,--__ --'-_________________ Ri_
o
Ch_3I'_d_A_: Pu_tn_am_
BROKERS.PLANNERS.VEVELOPERS
Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail
DATE: March 28, 1995
FROM:
Eden' Prairie City Council
. Jim Ostenson, Tandem propertiesf
TO:
RE: The Big Woods Variance Request No. 95-06 .
Sinc~the last city council meeting, we have been ~ the proces~ofrevising our yariance requ~st.
At this time, we have. not completed our revisions· . and would request that the city' council .
contmue this· item to an unspecified future date. ..'
Thank. you very much for your kind" consideration of this. request ..
-,' ~
.,' j .•
:",
2765 Casco Point Road. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 .~ Office & Fax (612) 471-0573 .
7808CreekridgeCircle. Suite 310 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55439· Office (612) 941":7805 • Fax (612) 941-7853
, 2111.S.-2....
':. ,-
DATE:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
April 4, 1995
SECTION:
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Administration
Natalie Swaggert Appointments X.A.1 &
Craig Dawson B.1&2
Requested Action:
It is recommended that the Council appoint individuals from the following lists to serve on the respective
advisory groups.
Human Rights & Diversity Commission
(1) 3-year term
Deborah Young
Willie Carlton
Senior Issues Task Force
Term: April 1995 through October 1996
(1) Senior at-large
Marvin Cofer
Carlo Amato (unavailable until June, 1995)
(1) Resident at-large (social services field)
Background:
Barbara Buehl
Pam Reinstatler
At the February 16 meeting, the City Council interviewed the candidates identified above for potential
appointment to the Human Rights & Services Commission. Appointments were postponed pending
restructuring of the Human Rights & Services Commission and its supporting Committees. On March 21 the
new advisory Boards and Commission structure was approved. City Council made the necessary appointments
of existing Commission/Committee members and asked staff to prepare a candidate list for the remaining
positions. The individuals noted have been contacted and have indicated their willingness to serve.
Fonn cca-appt
NJS:bmm