Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 11/05/1996 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1996 8:00 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1996 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE by Venku Corporation. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 14.84 acres, Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 14.84 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for The Hills of Eden Prairie. Location: Bryant Lake Drive between Wooddale Church and Willow Creek Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review) City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 5, 1996 Page Two C. EXTENSION OF DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT by Metro Printing, Inc. Request to extend Developer's Agreement dated March 7, 1995. (Resolution) D. APPROVAL OF FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT DESIGN FRAMEWORK MANUAL E. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN HILLS TOWNHOMES (located east of Franlo Road and south of Prairie Center Drive) F. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE 24TH ADDITION (located south of Executive Drive and east of Anagram Drive) G. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY ADDITION (`LIL RED) H. APPROVAL PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF TH 169 AND FOUNTAIN PLACE, I.C. 96-5398 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. CAMP EDENWOOD by Friendship Ventures. Request for Site Plan Review on 2 acres. Location: Indian Chief Road. Edenwood Camping and Retreat Center. (Resolution for Site Plan Review) Continued from October 1, 1996 B. EDEN BLUFFS by Baton Corporation. Request for PUD Concept Amendment on 44 acres, PUD District Review on 1.53 acres, Zoning District Amendment in RM-6.5, Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres, and Preliminary Plat for 1.53 acres. Location: Sherman Drive at County Road 1. (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 5, 1996 Page Three C. VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH EXPANSION by Victory Lutheran Church. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the Public District on 5.9 acres and Site Plan Review on 5.9 acres. Location: Eden Prairie Road at Berger Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment) D. BARTUS ADDITION by Dan Bartus. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.44 acres. Location: Baker Road at St. Andrew. (Ordinance for Rezoning) E. CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11.03, SUBD3.,C. AMENDMENT TO CHANGE AVERAGE SETBACK CALCULATION Clarify regulation pertaining to average setback. (Ordinance) F. CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11.40, SUBD. 6., AMENDMENT CHANGING MINIMUM AREA FOR PUD FROM 15 TO 5 ACRES (Ordinance) G. VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PART OF COLUMBINE ROAD IN RESEARCH FARM 2ND ADDITION VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REQUEST FROM THE SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD FOR A CANOPY AT THE SENIOR CENTER B. REQUEST FROM RESIDENTS TO ADDRESS UPCOMING EXPANSION OF COUNTY ROAD 4 BETWEEN HIGHWAY 5 & PIONEER TRAIL C. REQUEST FROM POST CONSTRUCTION REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS • A. APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS & APPEALS TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM THROUGH MARCH 31, 1999 City Council Agenda Tuesday, November 5, 1996 Page Four Xl. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & FACILITIES 1. Request from The Trails Association Regarding Trail Easement 2. Proposal for Traffic Study at Flying Cloud Fields 3. Proposed 1997 Cash Park Fees 4. Community Center Pool Report D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT 11 �j UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1996 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra- Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Julie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation &Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL All members were present. Mayor Harris recognized members of Boy Scout Troop 479 in the audience. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Pidcock added items XI.A.1. Review SACs and WACs, and XI.A.2,. Recognition of Police Department. Case added item XI.A.3. Discussion Regarding Water and Air Quality at the Community Center Pool. Jullie added item XI.B.1. October 22 Workshop. Harris added item XI.A.4. Appoint City Council Representative to Eden Prairie Crime Prevention Fund. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. nPENPOnmUM III. MINUTES A. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/ENVIRONMENTAL & WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1996 Harris said page 4, paragraph 7, should be changed to add two sentences: "Over time expensive users voluntarily lowered their costs to those of their peers without coercion. No one wants to be a high-end user." Harris also noted her name was misspelled on page 4, paragraph 5. Case said page 4, paragraph 2, should be changed to "Dietz said we do put door hangers out and try to inform the public." I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 2 MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve as published and amended the Minutes of the Joint City Council/Environmental & Waste Management Commission meeting held Tuesday, October 1, 1996. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Tyra-Lukens abstaining. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1996 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, October 1, 1996, as published. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Tyra-Lukens abstaining. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. EDEN HILLS TOWNHOMES by Zachman Development Corporation. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 44-96 for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 5.18 acres, Adoption of Resolution 96-177 for Site Plan Review on 5.18 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Eden Hills Townhomes. Location: Franlo Road, west of Eden Commons Apartments, south of Lund's Center. (Ordinance 44-96 for Zoning District Change and Resolution 96-177 for Site Plan Review) C. RESOLUTION 96-178 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF STARING LAKE - PULTE TOWNHOMES D. RF..SOLUTION 96-179 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR IMPACT MARKETING ADDITION (located at the Southwest Quadrant of Baker Road and West 62nd Street) E. APPROVAL OF LAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR 9500 DELL ROAD F. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR BIRCH ISLAND ACRES 2ND ADDITION, I.C. 96-5396 G. APPROVE INVESTMENT RETAINAGE AGREEMENT FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION CONTRACT, I.C. 94-5350 Case asked that item C be pulled for separate discussion and approval. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve items A, B, and D-G of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. Regarding item C, Case asked if it is okay that the language about the outlot states "intended to be dedicated". Dietz noted the staff memo recommends approval subject to several conditions, including receipt of a warranty deed for Outlot B. 2_ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 3 MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve item C of the Consent Calendar, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report. Motion carried 4-1 with Tyra-Lukens opposed. V. PIJBHC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. 1996 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING (Resolution 96-180) Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on September 26, 1996 in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to all property owners proposed to be assessed under each respective improvement. Staff held a meeting prior to the Council meeting for those with questions about the assessments. City Engineer Gray called attention to the revised memorandum with last minute changes to the Special Assessments. 1. LC. 93-5334 Gray said this is an assessment for sanitary sewer improvements done as part of the County Road 62 construction project. The costs are no being passed along to the developer. There were no comments from the audience. 2. LC. 96-5396 Gray said this assessment is for street and utility improvements that have been completed to Birch Island Acres 2nd Addition. There were no comments from the audience. 3. Structure Demolition at 8510 Franlo Road Gray said this was done on a Special Assessment agreement to assess the costs back to the property owner. There were no comments from the audience. 4. SUPPLEMENTALS I.C. 52-166 Trunk Exclusions and Lateral Exclusions Gray said these properties were previously assessed for streets. He noted that the grey-shaded items have been prepaid. There were no comments from the audience. 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 4 LC. 52=203 Trunk Exclusions and Lateral Exclusions Gray said these properties are in the Staring Lane neighborhood. There were no comments from the audience. I.C. 52-205 Trunk Exclusions and Lateral Exclusions Gray said these properties are in the Sunrise Circle neighborhood. There were no comments from the audience. T.C. 52-212 Trunk Exclusions and Lateral Exclusions Gray said all but 12 of the properties in the Cedar Ridge Road/Corral Lane neighborhood have been previously assessed. There were no comments from the audience. Thorfinnson asked why PID 21-1'16-22-32-0003 is $7,139.42 when the others are all$7,073.41. Tyra-Lukens noted that PID 21-116-22-23-0003 is $220.00 while the others are $520.00. Gray said PID 21-116-22-23- 0003 should be $220.00, and he will check on PID 21-116-22-32-0003. I.C. 94-5360 Trunk Exclusions and Lateral Exclusions Gray said these properties in the Golden Ridge neighborhood have now connected so they are being assessed. There were no comments from the audience. Trunk Sewer & Water Gray said these trunk sewer and water assessments are for subdivision assessments and one business property. He said we have received a letter from Physical Electronics, the owner of a large parcel part of which was sold to Opus Corporation. The portion sold to Opus Corporation is part of this assessment, and Physical Electronics has sent a letter that reserves their right to appeal. There were no comments from the audience. City &Metro SAC. Special Assessment Agreement SAC/WAC, Storm Water Treatment Special Assessment Agreement, Storm Sewer Special Assessment Agreements and Special Assessment Agreement CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 5 There were no comments from the audience. Tax Forfeiture Gray said there was a special assessment agreement with Hustad Development that reassesses the tax forfeiture amount due from the American Lutheran Church 2nd Addition. There were no comments. Weed & Tall Grass, Connections Fees Harris asked if the assessment for weed and tall grass is used by the City to cut the weeds. Gray said we do not cut on a regular basis. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adopt Resolution 96-180 ordering the 1996 Special Assessments. Motion carried unanimously. Pidcock asked if the new owners of Rogers Homestead have been notified of the assessment for Connection Fees. Gray said notice goes to property owners of record. Since Hennepin County has not assigned PID numbers, this is only sent to the underlying property. B. TIRES PLUS by Tires Plus. Request for PUD Concept Amendment Review on 15 acres, PUD District Review on 1.15 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.15 acres and Site Plan Review on 1.15 acres. Location: Eden Road and Glen Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) Continued from October 1, 1996 Jullie said the applicants for this project have withdrawn their proposal as per the attached letter of October 2, 1996. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing and to return the project plans to the proponent. Motion carried unanimously. C. REISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS FOR FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS PROTECT - PHASE I IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,900,000 (Resolution 96-181) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 6 Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on October 1, 1996 in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and in the Eden Prairie News on October 10, 1996. As per the attached staff agenda report of October 15, 1996, the proposed Resolution will allow the reissuance of bonds for Phase I of the Fountain Place Apartments Project. The amendment will include an interest rate which floats with an index and extends the maturity to December 1, 2018. In addition, the owners of the project have agreed to accept Section 8 vouchers for up to 10% of the 490 units. Pidcock asked how many Section 8 vouchers they have agreed to. Jullie said 10% of the 490 units, or 49 units. Case noted the wording says up to 10% and asked if that would allow them to not have 10%. Harris said because it is voluntary they might not be able to get 10%. Rosow said there is an agreement being drafted that states they must accept a maximum of 10%. Pidcock noted they had a meeting of the Work Force group, an outgrowth of the Reverse Commute group from Southwest Metro, and discussed the need for the City to target scattered site housing and more moderately priced housing for employees in the various business neighborhoods. A representative of Capital Apartment Properties, Inc., was available to answer any questions regarding this item and the next one. In regard to Section 8, he said it is their intent to do their best to get to the 10% number. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing; and to adopt Resolution 96-181 approving reissuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for Fountain Place Apartments Project Phase 1 in the amount of$20,900,000. Motion carried unanimously. Tyra-Lukens asked if we are to give staff direction on the issue of TEFRA hearings. Rosow said there are many projects with refinancing involved where it would be more appropriate for staff members to conduct the hearings. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to direct that TEFRA hearings for refinancing projects be convened by City staff. Motion carried unanimously. D. REISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS FOR FOUNTAIN PLACE APARTMENTS PROJECT - PHASE II IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,600,000 (Resolution 96-182) Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on October 1, 1996 in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and the Eden Prairie News on October 10, 1996. As per the attached staff agenda report of October 15, 1996, the proposed CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 7 Resolution will allow the reissuance of bonds for Phase II of the Fountain Place Apartments Project. The amendment will include an interest rate which floats with an index and extends the maturity to December 1, 2018. In addition, the owners of the project have agreed to accept Section 8 vouchers for up to 10% of the 490 units. Rosow distributed a replacement resolution with a minor change in the resolution. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to close the Public Hearing; and to adopt Resolution 96-182 approving reissuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for Fountain Place Apartments Project Phase II in the amount of$12,600,000. Motion carried unanimously. E. VACATION 96-07; VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN RESEARCH FARM 3RD ADDITION (Resolution 96-183) Jullie said this utility easement is no longer needed because the existing utilities are being relocated, per the approved plat of the Staring Lake Townhomes. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing; and to adopt Resolution 96-183 vacating the drainage and utility easements in Research Farm 3rd Addition as described. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Case, Pidcock, Thorfmnson, Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS A. APPOINTMENT OF STUDENT/YOUTH MEMBERS TO COMMISSIONS MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to reappoint John Katzung to the Heritage Preservation Commission and Cory Knudtson to the Human Rights CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 8 &Diversity Commission for one additional term each; and to appoint Eric Formico to the Environmental &Waste Management Commission, John O'Donnell to the Human Rights &Diversity Commission, Melody Hasse and Jennifer Freemyer to the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission, and Jessica Lind to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORLS_OEMLINCILAMBERS 1. Review SACs and WACs Pidcock asked staff to explain the terms SAC and WAC. Jullie said the SAC is a Service Availability Charge started by the Metropolitan Waste Commission that is paid by all new connections. The City has a similar charge levied at the time of hook-up that is set annually by the City Council. The WAC charge is tied to water usage and is based on a pre- determined number of SAC units. He said heavy water users such as restaurants and car washes can get fairly substantial connection charges. Dietz said we get funds to pay the debt we incur to build our facilities by charging the trunk assessments, the sewer and water access charges and the $12.50 fee on the water bills. Pidcock thought it was important to know the economic impact on anyone putting in a restaurant in the City and what effect it has on the business community. Harris asked if other cities have the same type of arrangement. Dietz replied they looked at other cities when the Bearpath subdivision was reviewed and found that some cities have it and some don't. Case asked if there is any evidence that these charges have caused a prospective restaurant owner to not build a restaurant. Dietz thought it has happened. The consensus was that staff should review the charges imposed on the business community, survey some of the other communities to see what they are charging, and return to the Council with a report. 2. Recognition of Police Department Pidcock thought the Police Department deserves special recognition for the work they did in the recent drug bust. Harris asked Staff to draft something for the Council to present. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 9 3. Discussion Regarding Water and Air Quality at the Community Center Pool Case received some concerns from residents about the air and water quality at the Community Center pool. He would like to know what is happening and what steps we are taking to correct the situation. Jullie said Bob Lambert sent a memo through regarding meetings we have had with the teams that use the pool. He believes the situation is under control; however, we haven't determined any funding mechanism for the changes that will have to be made next year. Case asked if the Oak Point pool has met our expectations in terms of moving some of the open swim time over there. Jullie said the team activity will stay at the Community Center pool, and we will then be able to drop the temperature in the pool area which will help the chlorine problem. Pidcock noted this is an on-going problem at the Community Center pool, and she has received a lot of complaints over the years. Case thought we may need to discuss the issues and the possible solutions at a Council meeting if we continue to have sickness and other problems occur at the Community Center Pool. Jullie said we can schedule a discussion for the next meeting or in the near future. 4. Appoint City Council Representative to Eden Prairie Crime Preventiji Fund Harris said she will not be able to continue as the Council representative to the Eden Prairie Crime Prevention Fund. She has asked Councilmember Case to serve, and he has agreed. The consensus was that Case should replace Harris as the Council representative. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. October 22 Workshop Jullie said the original workshop schedule called for a second workshop to discuss boards and commissions on October 22, 1996. Staff has determined that we are not prepared to present the recommendations needed for the second session. Thorfinnson said the primary reason is that we will not complete our joint meetings with the boards and commissions until January. 9r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 10 The consensus was to postpone the workshop until the joint meetings have been completed and staff can present recommendations. C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & FACILITIES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Award Contract for Municipal Liquor Store No. 4 (Resolution 96-184) Enger said bids were opened on Friday, October 11, for the construction of Municipal Liquor Store No. 4 at the Cub Food site. Staff recommends the contract be awarded to Hunerberg Construction, who submitted the lowest bid at $1,216,000. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution 96-184 Awarding the Contract for Municipal Liquor Store No. 4 to Hunerberg Construction in the amount of$1,216,000. Motion carried unanimously. Case said the issue of whether the City should be in the liquor store business came up at the candidate meeting. He noted that three of the current Councilmembers never had to address this issue, and he thought we should review the issue at a workshop somewhere down the line. He thought there are some side issues about selling tobacco that should be addressed. The consensus was to wait until the new City Council is in place to schedule the workshop. Harris thought it makes sense to review this periodically as questions seem to arise every two or three years.. E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Approve Amendment to Contract for Architectural Services for Parks/Public Works Maintenance Facility, I.C. 96-5417 Dietz said staff has been working with our architectural consultant to develop plans and specifications for the new Public Works/Parks Maintenance Facilities. Over the past five months, we have determined that the anticipated scope of services and preliminary cost estimate for the total project were too low. Accordingly, we find it necessary to recommend an adjustment in the Contract for Services with Kodet Architectural Group. Based on a revised construction cost of$4,100,000, the fees will be increased from $230,000 to $310,000. This contract revision commits the architect to provide at least $400,000 in alternates so as to insure the project coming in on budget, and reducing their risk of having to redraw the project. The City will save $11,250 in fees. Plans CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 15, 1996 Page 11 and specifications for this project will be presented to the Council for review and approval prior to authorization to advertise for bids. At such time, an updated budget for the financing to cover the cost of this project will be presented. Thorfinnson wanted to make sure we are not approving the project, and this amendment is just for the architectural services. Harris said that was true. Tyra-Lukens asked if the primary issue is the sale of the existing facility to MNDoT because she is getting nervous about having an empty Police building and an empty public service building. Dietz said MNDoT agreed with purchasing all the remaining right-of-way for Hwy 212 during the public hearings for Hwy 212. We are in the process of scheduling a meeting with them to talk through the issue. We have an offer on the table now, but it is for about one-half of what we think the buildings are worth. Dietz thought we have a well-stocked arsenal to present our point of view and he believes we will arrive at a reasonable price. Pidcock noted that MNDoT has spent almost $100,000,000 in acquiring the right-of-way for Hwy 212. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Professional Services Supplement with Kodet Architectural Group as per the staff agenda report of October 15, 1996. Motion carried unanimously. F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. I I r - eiPmrit,rw CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar 11-5-96 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Pat Solie Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. PLUMBING. GASFITTER Doody Mechanical Inc Doody Mechanical Inc Hendel Plumbing Symington Plumbing Podany Plumbing Southwest Plumbing HEATING & VENTILATING Triple D Heating & Air Conditioning Doody Mechanical Inc TEMPORARY LIQUOR Childrens Home Society of MN. 11-14-96 (with waiver of 30 day waiting period) Action/Direction: November 5. 1996 1 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-5-96 SECTION: 2ND READING ITEM NO. 1 L U. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 14.84 acres; • Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 14.84 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Zoning District Change 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the "land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RM-6.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RM-6.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation"and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety,by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of November 5, 1996, entered into between Venku Corporation and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 1st day of October, 1996, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of November, 1996. ATTEST: John D. Franc, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on Z THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Bryant Lake Drive between Wooddale Church and Willow Creek Road from Rural to RM-6.5 on 14.84 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A,included with this Ordinance,gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) d � x eD A CD O � 7 � LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of section 1, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly line of U.S. Highway No. 169 as described in Document No. 4638422. And That part of the South One—Half (S 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4), Section One (1), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty—two (22) West of the Fifth Principal Meridian lying North of State Highway No. 169. Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 1 -116-22; thence East along the South line of said Section 1 -116-22 a distance of 876.30 feet to the Westerly line of State Highway No. 169; thence Northeasterly along said Westerly right of way line of said State Highway No. 169 a distance of 241.63 feet; thence angle left 94 degrees 37 minutes a distance of 276.62 feet to actual point of beginning; thence angle right 53 degrees 30 minutes and parallel to the West line of said Section 1-116-22 a distance of 300.0 feet; thence angle left 90 degrees a distance of 150 feet; thence angle left 90 degrees and parallel to the West line of said Section 1 -116-22 a distance of 347.46 feet; thence angle left 107 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 157.4 feet to point of beginning. Also the following described tracts for ingress and egress: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section 1-116-22: thence East along South line of said Section 1-116-22 a distance of 876.3 feet to the Westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 169; thence Northeasterly along said right of way line a distance of 208.51 feet to actual point of beginning; thence angle left 94 degrees 37 minutes a distance of 257.18 feet; thence angle left 54 degrees 00 minutes a distance of 151.0 feet; then angle right 107 degrees 30 minutes a distance 34.6 feet; thence angle right 72 degrees 30 minutes a distance of 157.4 feet; thence angle right 54 degrees 00 minutes a distance of 276.62 feet; thence angle right 85 degrees 23 minutes a distance of 33.12 feet to point of beginning. THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE BY VENKU CORPORATION WHEREAS, Venku Corporation has applied for Site Plan approval of The Hills of Eden Prairie on 14.84 acres for construction of 38 lots located at Bryant Lake Drive between Wooddale Church and Willow Creek Road to be zoned RM-6.5 by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on October 1, 1996; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its August 12, 1996 and September 9, 1996, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its October 1, 1996, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to The Hills of Eden Prairie for the construction of 38 lots,based on plans dated September 24, 1996, between Venku Corporation, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk c DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THE HILLS OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of November 5, 1996, by Venku Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plat of 14.84 acres into 38 lots for construction of 37 townhouses, all on 14.84 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Zoning and Resolution No.96-175, Preliminary Plat, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review. Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated September 24, 1996, reviewed and approved by the City Council on October 1, 1996, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Developer acknowledges that the street and utility plans for the project are conceptual. Prior to the approval of a final plat,the Developer shall have prepared, by a licensed engineer, construction plans and specifications in accordance with performance standards directed by the City Engineer. Plans and specifications for public streets, sanitary sewer, watermain, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer,together with design calculations, shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to the issuance of a construction permit. All sanitary sewer and watermain shall be public except individual unit services which shall be private. Developer shall pay, to the City, a fee of five percent (5%) of the construction cost of public streets and utilities. Developer shall be responsible for the errors and omissions of the Developer's professional consultants and contractors. The construction of all public streets and utilities for the project shall be completed by the Developer in accordance with City Code with the supervision of the Engineer who prepared the plans and specifications. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. 4. FINAL GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 5. TREE LOSS - TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 1833 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 184 caliper inches. Tree replacement required is 24 caliper inches. Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a tree replacement plan for 24 caliper inches. Said plan shall include replacement trees of a 3 inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a seven foot minimum height for conifer trees. Upon approval by the City Forester, Developer agrees to implement or cause to be implemented the approved tree replacement plan for 24 caliper inches prior to building permit issuance. 6. CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING TREES AND WETLANDS ON THE PROPERTY: Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall submit a Conservation Easement for review and approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. The conservation easement shall include the area referred to on exhibit B. A copy of which is attached as Exhibit E. Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, Developer shall deliver and record the Conservation Easement in the Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrars Office and shall provide evidence of the recording of Conservation Easement prior to the release of the first building permit. 7. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to construct, or implement,the approved exterior materials and colors plan concurrent with building construction on the Property and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 8. FINAL ORDER NO. 96-19: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances from City Code requirements within the RM 6.5 Zoning District for construction on the Property as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said approval has been granted through Final Order #96-19, attached hereto, and made a part hereof. Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order No. 96-19. Developer agrees to file Final Order # 96-19 of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals on the Property at the Hennepin County Recorder/Registrar prior to the building permit issuance. Prior to the release of any building permit on the property, Developer agrees to provide proof of filing to the City. 9. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the wooded areas on the property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a plan depicting the construction grading limits on the property. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall place a construction fence at the limits of the proposed grading as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester. 10. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved irrigation plan concurrent with construction and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 11. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials as shown on the landscape plan as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City code. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved landscape plan concurrent with building construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 12. PRETREATMENT PONDS: Prior to final plat approval on the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's approval of plans and design information for all storm water quality facilities to be constructed; and receive City Engineer's approval of said plans. Developer shall implement the approved storm water quality facility plan concurrent with building construction. Upon completion of the housing construction and before the issuance of any certificate of occupancy,the Developer shall provide written verification to the City Engineer that the original design volume of the treatment pond has not diminished because of sedimentation/erosion and to restore original volume if sedimentation/erosion has occurred. 13. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of, plans for demolition and/or removal of existing structures, septic systems, and wells on the Property, and for restoring the Property to grade. Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of$1,000.00 to guarantee compliance with the approved plan. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after it is verified by City that Developer has completed implementation of the approved plan. 14. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining walls. 9 Upon approval by the Chief Building Official, Developer agrees to implement the approved retaining wall plan, concurrent with the grading, street, and utility construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 15. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Developer shall provide a permanent easement, as shown on Exhibit F, in favor of the City in a form and substance as approved by the Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources, prior to the release of the final plat. Said easement shall be drafted in a recordable form. Proof of recording said trail easement in the appropriate Hennepin County's Records/Registrars office shall be provided to the City prior to the release of the final plat. 16. CLEANUP OF DEBRIS FROM COUNTRYSIDE AUTO: Developer agrees that no building permit shall be issued until all tires, vehicles, auto parts and other debris from the Countryside Auto use of the Property has been removed from the Property and approved by the City Manager. !U EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 5, 1996 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. IV C. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger Metro Printing,Inc.- Extension of Developer's Scott A. Kipp Agreement Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt Resolution granting a 24 month extension to Developer's Agreement between Metro Printing, Inc. and the City of Eden Prairie. Background: Metro Printing, Inc.received City Council approval for construction of an office/manufacturing facility at 7580 Equitable Drive,more fully described in a Developer's Agreement dated March 7, 1995. A condition of the Developer's Agreement states that if the project does not proceed within 24 months of the date of approval, the Developer would not object to City Council action to revoke the approvals granted, thus restoring the property to the status prior to the project approval. The Developer has indicated that they are evaluating a timetable for construction of the project,but that it will not take place prior March 7, 1997,the end of the 24 month required in the Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution to extend Developer's Agreement 2. Letter from Metro Printing dated 10-15-96 3. Metro Printing Developer's Agreement dated March 7, 1995 I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING EXTENSION TO THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR METRO PRINTING BY METRO PRINTING, INC. WHEREAS, Metro Printing, Inc.has received City Council approval for construction of an office/manufacturing building at 7580 Equitable Drive, more fully described in a Developer's Agreement dated March 7, 1995; WHEREAS, a condition of said Developer's Agreement states that if Developer does not proceed with the project within twenty-four(24)months of the date of Agreement,Developer would not oppose City Council action to revoke the approval action, thus restoring the status of the property before the project was approved; WHEREAS,the twenty-four(24)month period ends on March 7, 1997; WHEREAS,Developer has not proceeded with Agreement at this time, and has requested approval of an extension to the Developer's Agreement for an additional twenty-four(24)month period; WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said extension request at its November 5, 1996 meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that the extension of the Developer's Agreement be granted for an additional twenty-four (24)month period, ending March 7, 1999. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 Metro Printing,Inc. 9675 Hamilton Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Fax b121941-8941 Telephone 6121941-7377 October 15, 1996 METRO City of Eden Prairie Mr. Carl Jullie, City Manager 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Metro Printing, Inc. - Extension of Approval to build @ 7580 Equitable Drive (Property I.D. 10-116-22 32 0051) This letter is a request for an extension of approval to build on our property at 7580 Equitable Drive. We received approval to build a new facility on this property in February 1995 and it is my understanding that this approval would expire in February 1997. Since we have not established a construction date at this time, I am requesting an extension of this approval. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Thomas Jungels President TJ/jav DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT METRO PRINTING THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 7, 1995, by Metro Printing, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation,hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for PUD District Amendment on 20.15 acres, PUD District Review on 7.675 acres,Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 7.675 acres,Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to I-2 Zoning District on 7.675 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.675 acres and Preliminary Plat of 20.15 acres into two lots for construction of an office/manufacturing building of approximately 45,955 square feet with expansion to 72,949 square feet, all on 20.15 acres, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota,more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" • NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No.3-95-PUD-2-95,and Resolution No. 95-18 for Preliminary Plat and Resolution No. 95-37 Site Plan Review; Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials reviewed and approved by the City Council on January 17, 1995, and dated January 12, 1995, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET,UTILITY,EROSION CONTROL,PLANS: Prior to approval by the City of any final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems, storm sewer, and erosion control for the Property. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, those improvements listed above in said plans, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with Exhibit C, attached hereto. LI 4. LAND ALTERATION PERMIT: Prior to any construction or development on the Property, Developer agrees to apply to the City, and obtain the City Council's approval of a land alteration permit for the Property. Developer agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of the City's Erosion Control Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit D. 5. SOILS REPORTS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: Prior to issuance of any permit for grading on the site,Developer shall provide the City with a detailed soils report, assessing the existing soils for stability of the proposed 2.5 to 1 slopes and,and obtain the City Engineer approval,an implementation plan for construction and restoration of the slopes. Upon approval by the City Engineer, the Developer agrees to construct or cause to be constructed said slope stabilization in accordance with the Implementation Plan 6. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to the issuance of any permit for construction of structures on the property, Developer shall submit to the Community Development Department and receive the Community Development Department's approval of samples of proposed exterior materials and colors. Upon approval by the Community Development Department, the Developer agrees to construct or cause to be constructed said exterior materials in accordance with the plans depicted as part of Exhibit B, and in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit C attached hereto. 7. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City and receive the Community Development Department's approval of a mechanical equipment screening plan developed in accordance with the City code. Upon approval by the Community Development Department, Developer agrees to construct or implement said mechanical equipment screening plan in accordance with the terms and provisions of Exhibit C attached hereto. 8. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash and recycling areas shall be screened from adjacent roadways and Purgatory Creek. 9. SIGNING: Developer has submitted a sign plan as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto. Developer agrees that the building materials for the free-standing monument shall be compatible with exterior materials and colors used on the building. 10. LIGHTING: Developer has submitted an exterior lighting plan for the property utilizing 25 foot high,downcast lighting standards. Any lighting proposed on the building shall be downcast cutoff luminars(shoebox design)to direct lighting onto the ground and not cause glare offsite. 11. TRAIL ALIGNMENT: Prior to the issuance by the City of any permit for construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks,Recreation, and Natural Resources, and obtain the Director's approval of detailed plans for the trail to be constructed on the property. Said trail shall be constructed in the following location as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto: 5 A. An eight-foot ag-lime wide trail along the north side of Purgatory Creek.. Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, Developer agrees to construct, or implement said trail concurrent with construction of utilities on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 12. PROOF OF PARKING: Developer and City acknowledge that 37 proof of parking spaces are proposed for the Property,depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and are designated for the use by Metro Printing. Said spaces are not required to be constructed at this time. However, said spaces may be required to be constructed in the future if it is determined by the City, in its sole discretion, that it is necessary. At such time as City, in its sole discretion, may determine that it is necessary for the required 37 proof of parking spaces to be constructed,the following shall occur: A. City shall notify the Developer in writing that it must construct the required 37 proof of parking spaces. B. Within six months of the receipt of written notice from the City, Developer agrees to have completed construction of the required 37 proof of parking spaces,as determined by the City, in the location as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT EXHIBIT C I. Prior to release of any building permit,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for approval two copies of a development plan(1"=100'scale) showing existing and proposed contours, proposed streets, and lot arrangements and size,minimum floor elevations on Lot 1,preliminary alignment and grades for sanitary sewer,watermain, and storm sewer, 100-year flood plain contours,ponding areas,tributary areas to catch basins, arrows showing direction of storm water flow on all lots, location of walks, trails, and any property deeded to the City. II. Developer shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer plans to the Watershed District for review and approval. Developer shall follow all rules and recommendations of said Watershed District. III. If Developer fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within twenty-four(24)months of the date hereof,Developer, for itself,its successors, and assigns, shall not oppose City Council action to revoke the PUD District Amendment on 20.15 acres,PUD District Review on 7.675 acres, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 7.675 acres, Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to I-2 on 7.675 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.675 acres and Preliminary Plat of 20.15 acres approval, thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. IV. Provisions of this Agreement shall be,binding upon and enforceable against developer when developer purchases the property, owners, their successors, and their assigns of the property herein described. V. Developer represents and warrants that they own fee title to the property free and clear of mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances,except: THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a New York corporation is the fee owner. Developer will be purchasing the Property from said owner prior to commencement of construction. With respect to any interest in all portions of the Property which Developer is required, pursuant to this Agreement,to dedicate or convey to the City(the "Dedicated Property"),Developer represents and warrants as follows: A. That Developer has not used,employed, deposited, stored,disposed of,placed or otherwise allowed to come in or on the Dedicated Property, any hazardous substance, hazardous waste, pollutant, or contaminant, including, but not limited to, those defined in or pursuant to 42 U.S.C. SS 9601, et. seq., or Minn. Stat., Sec. 115B.01, et. seq. (such substances, wastes, pollutants, and contaminants hereafter referred to as "Hazardous Substances"); B. That to the best of Developer's knowledge, Developer has not allowed any other person to use, employ, deposit, store, dispose of, place or otherwise have, in or on the Dedicated Property, any Hazardous Substances; C. That to the best of Developer's knowledge, no previous owner, operator or possessor of the Dedicated Property, nor anyone else with access to the Dedicated Property used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed, or otherwise allowed in or on the Dedicated Property any Hazardous Substances; Developer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City, its successors and assigns, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys fees and costs, resulting from or due to the release or threatened release of Hazardous Substances which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been, used,employed, deposited,stored,disposed of,placed, or otherwise located or allowed to be located, in or on the Dedicated Property by Developer, its employees, agents, contractors or representatives. VI. Developer acknowledges that Developer is familiar with the requirements of Chapter 11, Zoning, and Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations, of the City Code and other applicable City ordinances affecting the development of the property. Developer agrees to develop the property in accordance with the requirements of all applicable City Code requirements and City Ordinances. VII. Prior to release of the final plat, Developer shall pay to City fees for engineering review. VIII. City shall not issue any building permit for the construction of any building, structure, or improvement on any land required to be subdivided until all requirements listed above have been satisfactorily addressed by Developer. IX. Developer shall submit detailed watermain, fire protection, and emergency vehicle access plans to the Fire Marshall for review and approval. Developer shall follow all the recommendations of the Fire Marshall. X. Developer acknowledges that the rights of City performance of obligations of Developer contemplated in this agreement are special,unique, and of an extraordinary character, and that, in the event that Developer violates, or fails, or refuses to perform any covenant, condition, or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy at law. Developer agrees,therefore,that in the event Developer violates, fails, or refuses to perform any covenant, condition, or provision made herein, City may, at its option, institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforce performance of such covenant. No remedy conferred in this agreement is intended to be exclusive and each shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of any other remedy. XI. Any term of this Agreement that is illegal or unenforceable at law or in equity shall be deemed to be void and of no force or effect to the extent necessary to bring such term within the provision of any such applicable law or laws,and such terms as so modified and the balance of the terms of this agreement shall be enforceable. XII. Developer shall,prior to the commencement of any improvements,provide written notice to Paragon Cable, a Minnesota Limited Partnership,the franchisee under the City's Cable Communication Ordinance (80-33) of the development contemplated by this Developer's Agreement. Notice shall be sent to Paragon Cable, 801 Plymouth Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55411. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. METRO PRINTING, INC. / Y OF EDEN PRAIRIE i � -� z.- • Jean L. Harris, yor Carl J. Ju lie, anager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (2/ day of , 1995, by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. ANTE M SCHNEIDER ,z - /e �J i y ' NOTARY PUBt1C-MINNES01A No Public •�/ `�`I�.J o r - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES IAA 3' �� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /6 day of ,Tal.)4,447 , 1995,by Metro Printing, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. �,, 1ANICE M SCHNEIDER ;$ kr�Public - NOTARY PUBLIC-M I NNESOT,A MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN 31 00 v 9 OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN METRO PRINTING, INC. AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 7, 1995, by and between THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a New York corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. 3-95-PUD-2-95, changing the zoning of a 7.675 acre parcel of property owned by Owner from the C-Comm District to the I-2 District, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of March 7, 1995, by and between Metro Printing, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Metro Printing, fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose City Council action to revoke the PUD District Amendment on 20.15 acres, PUD District Review on 7.675 acres, Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 7.675 acres, Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to I-2 on 7.675 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.675 acres and Preliminary Plat of 20.15 acres approval,-thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property only if owner or any such successor assigns elects to develop the project identified in the plans submitted by Metro Printing Inc. in connection with the Developer's Agreement. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. 4. Owner is executing this supplement to the Developer's Agreement for the sole and express purposes of agreeing to the terms hereof and of consenting to the execution of said Developer's Agreement; but by doing so Owner does not assume any obligations of the Developer under said Developer's Agreement unless Owner proceeds with the development of the property. /0 • 02/16/85 12:32 FAX 812 .. 2868 DORSEY . WHITNEY _,. _. t 011 - FEB 16 '95 11:91 TO:9-3.,.,7800 FROM:CITY OF EDc.- PRAIRIE T-901 P_09 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforeSatid. EQ[JrTABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF EN PRAIRIE OF THE UNITED STATES / ..�N U CST/`z'riT of=-, � �, y� r Carl S_.1 "c i gar STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o?( day of c.,�� - , 1995. by Scan L. Harris and Carl I_ Juliic, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of en Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation,on behalf of said corporation_ JANICE M SCHNEIDER Nofrublic/�7'/(// r NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESO1A rr No Pubhc MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN 31 00 STATE ONNESOTA ) "''elea. `.44`44'""`°44`4 t F 1VII )u- COUN"ZY OF gENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Cratday of-eraliCZv74 , 1995, by THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES,a New Ymicorporation. on behalf of the corporation. �^ n Jlr Notary rUblic "OFFICIAL SEAL" • +' JANE E_ POWELL .' i NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF ILLINOIS : My Commission Expires May 4. 1995 • II 7q:TT C . JL a�-4 60d 6,E '3'el 31SCiIf1O3 ELTSLESET2+ Exhibit "A" Legal Description: Proposed Lot 1, Block 1 of Outlot A, Edenvale 9th Addition EXHIBIT D EROSION CONTROL POLICY January 1, 1993 MISSION STATEMENT At any given time, Eden Prairie has a large amount of property denuded of vegetation with land alteration in progress. Erosion may result from ongoing construction activities such as road and highway projects, industrial, commercial, residential development, and individual house construction. These activities are prone to erosion, producing sediment that can infiltrate storm sewer systems, affect water quality, clog streets and sidewalks, and cause damage to property. The City Council has recognized the need and directed City staff to devise a comprehensive erosion control policy. The benefits of these controls can be realized in improved water quality, increased safety and monetary savings in clean up efforts. The City Council has directed the following Policy to be implemented: 1. All construction projects permitted by the City of Eden Prairie which result in the temporary disturbance of vegetative or non-vegetative surfaces protecting soils from erosion require the use of Best Management Practices (BMP's) as outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's manual, Protecting Water Quality In Urban Areas, to mitigate the impact of erosion on wetland and water resources. The City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may impose special conditions to permits which stipulate erosion control procedures and/or direct the installation of erosion control features or the clean up of erosion at construction sites. Permits effected by this policy include all grading permits, building permits, and permits for the installation of utilities. 2. All erosion control systems stipulated in the permit shall be installed prior to the issuance of the permit. Supplemental erosion control systems ordered by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections shall be installed within 48 hours. 3. All erosion control systems must be maintained by the permittee in a functional condition until the completion of turf and/or structural surfaces which protect the soil from erosion. The permittee must inspect erosion control bi-weekly and immediately after each rainfall event of .5 inches or more. Needed maintenance shall be performed within 48 hours. 4. Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall be utilized at all construction sites to minimize the trackage or spillage of soil on public streets or highways. BMP's may include, but are not limited to, rock construction entrances, washing stations, frequent cleaning of streets adjacent to the construction site or limiting operations when site conditions are unmanageable. Trackage or spillage of soil on a public street or highway must be cleaned by power sweepers within the time frame stipulated in the permit special conditions or as ordered by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections. 5. If erosion breaches the perimeter of a construction site, the permittee shall immediately develop a clean up and restoration plan, obtain the right-of-entry from the adjoining property owner, and implement the clean up and restoration plan within 48 hours of obtaining the adjoining property owner's permission. In the event eroded soils enter onto or are tracked or spilled on a public street, highway, sidewalk or trail, the permittee shall remove the soil material and thoroughly sweep the street or sidewalk surface within four hours. If eroded soils enter, or entrance appears imminent, into wetlands or other water bodies, clean up and repair shall be immediate. Permittee shall provide all traffic control and flagging required to protect the traveling public during the clean up operations. Is 6. When a permittee fails to conform to any provision of this policy within the time stipulated in a written notification, the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may take the following actions: a. Withhold the scheduling of inspections and/or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. Direct the correction of the deficiency by City forces or separate contract. The issuance of a permit constitutes a right-of-entry for the City or its contractor to enter upon the. construction site for the purpose of correcting deficiencies in erosion control. All costs incurred by the City in correcting erosion control deficiencies shall be reimbursed by the permittee. All invoices for erosion control correction shall be due and payable within 30 days. Invoices not paid within 30 days shall accrue interest at a rate of 1% per month. Each charge for correction of erosion deficiencies shall be a lien upon the property to which the permit applies. Invoices more than 30 days old on September 30 or any year or on any other date as determined by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may be assessed against the property. As a condition of the permit, the owner shall waive notice of any assessment hearing to be conducted by the City, concur that the benefit to the property exceeds the amount of the proposed assessment and waive all rights by virtue of Minnesota Statute 429.081 to challenge the amount or validity of the assessment. I, We, The Undersigned, hereby accept the terms and conditions of the Erosion Control Policy dated January 1, 1993 as set forth and agree to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Applicant's Name (Please Print) Date Applicant's Signature Applicant's Title Office Phone No. Mobile No. Home No. Development Name: Lot: Block: iy EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 5, 1996 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR —��11L ITEM NO. D. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Motion to approve the Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual Background: The Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual was drafted and adopted at the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission in an effort to guide new construction and upgrades to existing buildings. The Manual will help establish cohesive design, aesthetic relationships, and to set a tone for an upgraded airport image. Since the MAC is a metropolitan agency of the state, a local unit of government may not force compliance with local zoning codes,but rather, tries to work in a cooperative manner. The Manual was first introduced at the joint meeting with the City Council on September 17, 1996. It has also been unanimously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 14, 1996 meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Memo from Scott A. Kipp dated October 11, 1996 2. Minutes from October 14, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner THROUGH: Michael D.Franzen,City Planner DATE: October 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual Flying Cloud Airport is one of six Regional Reliever airports owned and operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission(MAC). The airport was acquired by MAC in 1948,after the state created the agency to operate a system of airports within metropolitan area. The state granted MAC the authority to operate this system much the same way as a municipal corporation operates a city. The MAC has many of the same powers as a municipality, such as the authority to acquire property and levy taxes. Since the MAC is a metropolitan agency of the state, a local unit of government may not force compliance with local zoning codes, but rather, tries to work in a cooperative manner. Over 110 buildings occupy the airport property,many of which were constructed over thirty years ago. These buildings are in various levels of deterioration, and many of the older buildings may not meet current building code. In addition, some new construction has taken place recently which is beginning to set a tone for an upgraded airport image. It is with these issues in mind that the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission approved a Design Framework Manual for the airport. In cooperation with MAC,the Manual will help guide the development of future construction at Flying Cloud Airport through aesthetic exterior upgrading and cohesive design. Since property owned by MAC does not need to comply with local zoning codes,the City cannot require strict compliance with the building material standards defined in the zoning code. For example,the airport is zoned Public,requiring the use of face brick and glass for at least 75%of a building's exterior finish material. The Manual will continue to permit the use of this material,but because it is an airport environment, it will also allow the use of metal panel as an approved material if it meets established criteria. The Manual establishes parameters regarding building materials, signage, landscaping, etc.that need to be followed for new construction,or for the Z -Memoradum Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual October 11, 1996 Page 2 upgrading of existing buildings. None of the recommendations in the Manual will create a financial burden to building owners. Rather,the Manual supports many of the features that are already taking place at the airport as buildings are improved. This document will help to solidify those features. The Advisory Commission has submitted the Manual to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for their endorsement as well. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff would recommend City Council approval of the Design Framework Manual. 3 FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT DESIGN FRAMEWORK MANUAL July 1996 INTRODUCTION Flying Cloud Airport is located in south central Eden Prairie, consisting of approximately 560 acres of land. It is one of six reliever airports owned and operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC)within a 35 mile radius of the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. It is classified as a General Utility Airport by the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), and can accommodate all single engine aircraft,most twin engine, and light jet aircraft. Flying Cloud Airport offers a number of services to the public, including aircraft sales, aircraft rental,charter service, aircraft maintenance, and flight training. It also contains a World War II aircraft museum, an aircraft maintenance school, and an air traffic controller school. II. PURPOSE OF AIRPORT DESIGN FRAMEWORK The purpose of the Airport Design Framework Manual is to guide the development of future construction at Flying Cloud Airport. The Framework Manual includes guidelines for architectural standards, airport signs, site lighting, and trash handling. The goal of the guidelines is to encourage the sturdy construction and cohesive image of the facilities at Flying Cloud Airport. The design objectives of the guidelines are as follows: 1. Improve the quality of construction of the facilities. 2. Develop exterior aesthetic relationships between buildings through building materials and exterior colors. 3. Ensure that new signs are in conformance with the Eden Prairie Sign Code. 4. Contain site lighting to the airport facility and eliminate glare to neighboring buildings. 5. Increase landscaping areas to soften visual impacts of airport facilities, and increase visual interest. 6. Provide for adequate trash containment. 1 7 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 III. EXISTING INVENTORY A. Quality of Buildings and Hangars There are currently over 110 separate aircraft storage buildings at Flying Cloud Airport. The majority of these buildings were constructed over thirty years ago and are in various levels of deterioration,including: corrosion, chipped and faded paint,bent metal, cracked concrete block. Color schemes for these buildings vary from hangar to hangar, and include some colors that do not support any particular theme. Many of these older buildings may not meet current building codes as well. Some newly constructed facilities, and the upgrading of others have established a level of building improvement which should continue and be encouraged. These improvements involve the use of decorative concrete block and glass in construction, as well as warranted metal panels in earth tone colors. While there is a beginning of consistency in the types of building materials and color schemes used around the airport,there is still considerable variation in the physical appearance and age of the majority of these structures. B. Signs Existing business signs at the airport have no cohesive theme regarding materials or style. Signs range from painted sheets of plywood to internally lit pylons. Some signs are portable, some are attached to fences, while others are ground mounted. C. Landscaping Landscaping around the airport is sparse. Some improvements have been made in recent years, including the evergreen and crabapple trees installed by MAC along the northwest hangar row to help soften the view to the existing worn hangar facades. Ornamental trees and shrubs have been planted at the northeast corner of the airport as a"gateway" improvement. In addition,new evergreen and flowering shrubs have been installed as part of the recently completed Executive Aviation facility. While it is important to maintain obstruction clearance for all aircraft operations,the use of approved landscaping has helped to improve visual interest around the airport. D. Trash Handling Overall, the airport does not appear to have a trash handling problem. Many of the 2 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 existing hangar facilities do not generate any significant amount of trash to require a means for containment. Other facilities store trash within the structure,or provide an exterior trash dumpster for this purpose. IV. ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Purpose: To improve the quality of the construction of the facilities and to create aesthetic exterior relationships between buildings. New construction shall be reviewed based on the following standards: 1. All exterior building finishes shall consist of no less than 75%of the following materials: a) face brick,b)natural stone, c)decorative precast concrete,d) metal panel, e) glass, f)decorative concrete block. 2. For commercially classified buildings according to MAC,the exterior building elevation which most closely faces a public roadway shall contain no less than 25% of the following materials: a) face brick,b)natural stone, c)precast decorative concrete, d) decorative concrete block. 3. All metal panel shall consist of a minimum 20 year warranted,pre-colored,baked on finish in earth tone shades such as brown, beige, tan, grey, light blue,or dark blue. 4. All ground mounted,or roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be physically screened from all public roadways and adjacent differing land use. 5. All construction shall be in conformance with the Eden Prairie Building Code. V. SIGNS Purpose: To apply the standards and regulations from the Eden Prairie Sign Code to airport signs for commercial buildings. Future construction of commercial signs should incorporate relationships of size, type, and placement. 1. Entrance signs should be ground mounted and feature a directory of businesses 3 (0 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 and hangars in the area. These signs should use the same letter style, color,and material. 2. Commercial building signs,whether wall mounted,or pylon mounted should be professionally manufactured and be internally lit. Pylon signs shall be no taller than 25 feet. 3. Signs shall be in compliance with the Eden Prairie Sign Code. 4. Signs attached to the airport perimeter fence(other than Metropolitan Airports Commission informational signs) will not be approved. VI LANDSCAPING Purpose: To soften the visual impact of airport buildings and improve visual interest with plantings compatible with airport functions. Green areas can be improved by adding small ornamental trees and shrubs. Plantings around buildings can create visual interest and soften views to parking areas. Perimeter plantings of evergreen trees will add visual interest, and help with noise mitigation to adjacent residential or park uses. 1. As part of new construction, or a building upgrade, and where space permits, landscaping will be incorporated into the site to help soften views of parking areas. VII. SITE LIGHTING Purpose: To provide for adequate lighting for airport functions while preventing off-site glare impacts. Downcast lighting can be used to adequately light the area without spreading glare off site. It is desired that the lighting poles be of the same height and lighting intensity. Lights mounted on hangars or commercial buildings should be consistent in height, especially when hangars are in a row format. 1. All site lighting shall be of a downcast,or shielded variety to restrict off site glare. 2. Pole lighting shall not exceed 25 feet in height. 4 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 3. The type of lighting should be consistent throughout the airport property, i.e., high pressure sodium, mercury vapor, etc. VIII. ?'RASH HANDLING Purpose: To provide for a clean airport, and to maintain an aesthetically pleasing environment. Every possible attempt should be made to accommodate trash handling in the interior of the buildings. Trash storage areas should be accessible from both an interior and exterior door to facilitate proper maintenance. If it is not possible to handle trash within the building, a trash storage structure shall be constructed of building materials compatible with the architectural treatment of the principle structure. IX PLANS REQUIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION Site Plans shall include: 1. Existing and proposed structures affected by the proposed construction. 2. Existing and proposed parking areas for vehicles and aircraft. 3. Existing and proposed green areas, including aircraft tie-down areas. 4. Location of existing or proposed sewer and water systems. 5. Proposed signage, lighting,and landscaping details 6. Location of proposed trash enclosure, if trash is to be stored outside. Architectural Plans shall include: 1. Elevations of all sides of the building. 2. Floor plan including dimensions of all structures. 3. Type and color of exterior building materials. 5 Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual July 1996 4. Location of all heating, air conditioning,and ventilation systems, and the method for physical screening if visible from a public roadway. 5. Trash enclosure details, if the trash is to be stored outside. 6. Any other plans necessary for the Building Department to review the proposal for permit issuance. 6 0 DATE: 11/05/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Eden Hills Townhomes Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Eden Hills Townhomes subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$840 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$1,310 • Receipt of easement document for site line easement • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement Overview: This proposal, by Zachman Development Corporation consists of 5.18 acres to be divided into 21 townhouse units. The project is located along the east side of Franlo Road. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed October 15, 1996. JJ:ssa cc: Zachman Development Corporation Passe Engineering CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN HILLS TOWNHOMES WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Hills Towmhomes has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Eden Hills Towmhomes is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 24, 1996. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk Z N1)P TN LINE CE THE S^'U IN 1,2 CF THE SOUTUWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1,4 SEC GON 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22 N8615.18"E :�` N 88'56'18" E , 435.65 33 n 4--33.0 . - 128.00 86.37 63.39 85.71 1 I 35.31 /n t `L-3.48 1. 1-4 ,/,‘ /nut ^ N : e t ..3 !m - /r' .4P S' } , 46 ?g 9i 10 4, / 8 it I C) II n 8 de / �r.w ,, 1 9 J �,a �0 J9lZ' 7 I• rah "" ? I 4 mI 4 07 \is w 8 `CtA -j?�. g b yl I I .‘17 11 r1 n J,.ZJ S733,, c �,t'ii),5A / ��A = 6I II II 18 ,�o o 5 U U 7 7.15 7p40 0 n A51.0^$7 Ir P 12 r.. m <5 00 1, / - N86"57'18"E a a 68 03 8.W 46 N / I 181.13 VI C-8.:_ 5�� V1 ,7 I I ci I sAT 96< - nv1 1: 589.46'IVW Q 4 sJ ^4 • 7. 142.69 0 y O o ee 75. m 13 $ ;��I c_s � r a V u: ce t° no 'rytL \p, '? 589.481I,w , es" A n W ,w1. .`1 •, hry e(Yi ro N _--17.06 137.06 N .; ? fv eV V a IC u N N/tip°A O 2 _ V 14 I Q p .,o- 1, r^ 3� 1 N, ,, N89.46'11't ,al 5 �p r - , . ;^ 136.66 J co , v \' Z I r `\ r 2.7gt 7 aFb 269�4 J 15 g 3 I < \ �_ C-1 C /-5.77 „a\ di 31,E 7 t N89.46'11'E .a. 'i� ,•117.79 L..7.56 �� ��T• 95.47 ices sq n M tr. 1/ Ce I =;A' \ - 3,•• �+ R*553 Y F,1 G , 121/, .. r vt 1 I t..a ;\. q.s. `•Ac 0 N 'J 16 0o m 1 •I • \ c-24 rs 2 Js e e-1 417 Z 1 .I 33 A •.110' j655 \ 8.55- , C_22, c-21 1 �J��J. - n o I I A -• b N N O• I-o.31, tjrC $ - ,t, 21 i'" d °;`17 '•y3, 42 w G1 0 \-" P ' � In g q N \ 01 ,,., I s,,v p� a;p •5 ,J2' e7 20 q o' �18 -,*,) 0 9, 6 19 t2 _ R I ,0?:'?, gJ VI o 0 3 ?2S N Ted .9 c 4 ?'>$ ^ rn - o�, N A Q� z `. R A Al as,4 a w•o 4'f V Z I ' q SE�•45 9 • 0 '7 7d7 I n� 4 4F R 32 e4 'I 3 u I r' 0 A • D •09 re.4p N 1 \ I J I J40,74 Al \ \ I m \ V \ _ N \ I m r SFr, \\ _- - 435.84 - - N rr .: \ER � _ _ - .� _ _ 2209.1c. ., 1 P 5, R�,rIr,E 2....---......� S86.59'44"W 2644.83 5'R'T.I I lIE "F `IC,'7,I '4 DATE: 11/05/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: 32 SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Edenvale 24th Addition Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Edenvale 24th Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$642 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $775 • The requirements of the Developer's Agreement Overview: This proposal, located along Equitable and Anagram Drive, contains 20.5 acres to be divided into two outlots and one lot. Lot 1, Block 1 is the proposed site of the Reality Interactive Building. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed October 1, 1996. JJ:ssa cc: Tom Arneson, RLK Associates CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDENVALE 24TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Edenvale 24th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Edenvale 24th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 25, 1996 B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2 . , , ... EDENVALE 24TH ADDITION R.TDOC.NO 'N •:.• :". Il ,,Vi-,..- ..,' // I e • '64,,,,...""44", g :. ... V 17 :I . -F..;;;01:1,/r0.', A., •T., ... t • a TO,,,... OUTLOT A ) I,)I': 7 i... (7.) I. 1 f-:. .• ' 0 .6. • • „Al eo , .o arotar,.--•''''''-- ''.•..,, a -I BLOCK I. ''zk c-0 _---- , ',\c,.• , ;( .‘--''-- 'tt.....2:4, ..„. ,-:. LOT 1 ` ,.• A '' .. \tot •,0 Td..._ 1 ••••- . \,t• -,•••,, La, .-"Ira".1,. v 0...--T.. -• . 1.1 ‘s•.?..!.\''';':',. ,..' m.14' 4 ...am 1,400M 3,...rnsnena mn es.to men, ....:i• "..7.A 1.**...n'31.1.-... P.4*.ti,* •• -.....— ——A_int.z_._riga—-...- —.---,....._...-..--- ..i. b11. -1-IM-1)- ' ,1.'' ' ' moats.,ore a ay.as roam_ _ . •1 VFW ea-c ,.,.... .2 mbimbi• 'It annIsan1 ar...MN awn bt., .. Be '."..T.T• ,-.. / \ ... t.- - -----.. ,-1.r....-----. . :'-'i.-2----- - — .... . r Firin.13..l .te47S'' 4 :171; ' 4.1 Mol.IY'Or'IrANIN '"'"*".".IC'11;. -1r.:I1711:11::717.7:.:;:.:— r/a.b.....IM mum l•M....by.and 01 00000••LOCIOVALC 2•M AC011.1011 aml dem Munn, . Mom.so.0•01m.M IM Mblie low mblle um OMIMM end •• . MAW,Palle.rata,.Coat,NI..... . ' -'', - . FI:01 MAMIE.1.111.50TA :i !ei::m":::::::'"o:00000.le br:!pti'g.'.11.:,.;:Ort'egl::11.11:'1.1 . .‘.7'=1 r1:412:—,74 :.^1.1:1:'""X'S",c--":',?_•_-. '---• — „.."......the me.....cann.....•end resalmnaallens al the Casm.sta *I fr.0000000 ma end Me Cemly NM.,(mim(MM Men rm o....by Ms Clip or IM I Sisint r5i'lriZ:g: No CIT.Or 1301 MIME.1,11WIDOM 0 10, 10 300 11 SCALE IN FEET II. Sr- an. ea blooM/M laaaa APO MITE SAIIISMOS,ASE Sewn MAR STATE ..•tpt,O 4: f 2 COWIE Or(be 101 . vrmw l e mimmlmig. 'Iv 11..•_....,....dby M II;"— CO GAB ,,,. ..,„ II.13,E.7. 1 , ..1.,..1.1,..,,trUm. St.....•NnA,Vol, Petrick M cr.....1...9.i.c. r,,..,Nate. .r ..*.. e t, 2 rg..y......=—...SS. ......c. .,,.,.., "'"'"In21.1Sa. (.949),1114 On1 nos soon aeo......• 1 MS AS!Mama.m elm/ 02:,,r,:1:1;r14.2017701 ,7.7:r.:........ 7............,.190.0:::9r6.r e..:.jttl'irtj's, BASES.0.KAMM IS ASSINED Om Mee1 Mretrombl M.l:the.inn...one Sounder 11.,••om or..,p•Mmelmi en the 72!ret*:::C•1::::1 Ittioln.rt:Th?‘17r.t.i,:r":".:. .. fl,:r ti ir to th.•all..Ini. a mBiSS S NCH Br Is ni.Pan RE-BAR SIT eles....st.1 en IM 0IM IlE SAY WM.ST I.I.1.•••••d Ca PESOS=SAS Qat er. Noe, •0001E5 BOWS WON BOKIL.ENS .17,74:1..,...,:500..'11.6-°" . ...1:' RLK ASSOCIATES, LTD. —— 5 DATE: 11/05/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: -�V G. SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Eden Prairie Grocery Addition Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Eden Prairie Grocery Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$250 • The requirements of the Developer's Agreement Overview: This proposal is a plat of the 1.49 acre 'Lil Red store located at the southeast corner of Valley View Road and County Road 4. The purpose of the plat is to join two separate lots into one platted lot and dedication of additional right-of-way for Valley View Road and County Road 4. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed September 17, 1996. JJ:ssa cc: John Richmond, 2800 W. 44th St., Suite 202, Mpls, MN 55410 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF EDEN PRAIRIE GROCERY ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Eden Prairie Grocery Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Eden Prairie Grocery Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated October 25, 1996. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk Z I___` .. -I- ,A�r(yll-r- "v in1,, I I t A/- 1 /' F-l A / (- v rat I-_L_�.- Y Iv/t ....-1 `J V n11�1 i 11 1 ) /-THE NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC,8,T.1t6,R,22 THE NORTHEAST CORNER Road k'1n / --rr WEST OF THE SE%OF SEC.8,T./16,R,22 Road No FOUND NENN.CO.MONUMENT-, fhc mull', thence Se, 11/0.00 said('fool North zua the Itlnll,I thence Not VALLEY VIEWel to the in,- o north line I. ROAD', ON N North)1 (ABM/of I Bo ad No. or the Fast WEST Se:lian N. c 157.94 Lt7have ruled Ihr DRAINAGE ANO UTt _I v EASEMENT I GMXTRY AObI 0 50 50 —_ --- — —— li,r public use li S purprscs unh as sb tp I I I {n 0011tSv 0het: t•01rylr;tlilm bus r jI This daynr Ily J N �{ N ' tV cr V �./do d, Nc N 0 ' , O 1 W •d' ,u - N°N F I m O 4' STATE OF MINNt - `7 1z �'- r I N COUNTY OF IIFb 4 o The(im:going luso. L_) o I ��) o O ( IN w K 11- Z z br. W t �W , W '� e +�_ U O ca I N C F ^N - W N of Ilimcalha Math. �--- LLo 7 N .. Z _� no°N w+ f- ccrgxmaion, I W nt Notary Public. F. In z F W J U1 1 . U. O e ] MY Cunmlisssion N: I (_) l Fi V c r Q 1.-. w N p IA O a ° l V' / I r I • c v L___ 2 WEST —a--T------=i2a9Ap-_- s i 0.09 EAST O_ ; I a!I '--1NE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH i.__ ___ _ __._.__..__.__.__- _-_ —._ - -_ 208.00 FEET OF THE SE i ! S I I 11 T0.00 ---2! ______., 1 I ' I W S J) Z I a 1 ^fir-- I e la o O In r z i 1 I LU I 1 1 1 LLJ 90 C- I CL: N T-, -- S Y 20 p DRAINAGE ---——___ 1 I 1 � A(10 159-04 UTILIT'I 'EASEMENT , ---209.10--- • SCALE It o DENOTES t12 N1% �'Ft Y_-r_-t' MARRED BY MN:� 3 I I DATE: 11/05/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: T/ SECTION: Consent Calendar -� DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5398 Engineering Division Approve Proposal for Design Services for a Traffic Signal at Trunk Highway Rodney W. Rue 169 and Fountain Place Recommended Action: Motion to approve proposal from Westwood Professional Services, Inc., for design services for a traffic signal at the intersection of TH 169 and Fountain Place and authorize the mayor and manager to sign the proposal. Overview: In December 1995, the City Council passed a resolution requesting MnDOT to enter into a cooperative agreement for construction of a traffic signal at TH 169 and Fountain Place. We were unsuccessful in being selected as a cooperative agreement project for 1996. However, we have submitted this project again for 1997. Primary Issues: If this signal project is selected by MnDOT as a cooperative agreement project, the City is responsible for all design costs for the project. MnDOT would share only in the construction and contract administration costs. This design proposal does include some costs for preparing some supporting information that may help to justify our project, as well as the design and contract administration costs for a typical MnDOT traffic signal. This design proposal is being submitted to you now in order to get ahead of the process and actually begin to design the project prior to knowing if the project will be selected in February. There should be minimal risk in doing this, since the City is responsible for all design costs anyway. It will also provide us the opportunity to have the project ready for bids soon after MnDOT's selection process. There will be further council action necessary once appropriate construction cost splits and agreements are obtained. Financial Issues: This signal project is identified in the tax increment project list. Therefore, we are proposing to finance this design work using the Tax Increment Fund and hereby recommend approval of this design proposal from Westwood Professional Services, Inc., in the amount of$18,738. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 14180 Trunk Hwy. 5 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612-937-5150 FAX 612-937-5822 October 16, 1996 Mr. Rodney W. Rue, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 RE: I.C. 96-5398 Traffic Signals at T.H. 169 and Fountain Place Dear Rod: Westwood is pleased to present this proposal for engineering services for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of T.H. 169 and Fountain Place. In preparing this proposal, I have visited over the phone with the Mn/DOT Office of State Aid to get a clear understanding of the requirements and timeline for projects submitted under the Cooperative Agreement Process. We understand the mid-December deadline and will complete our sketch layout and justification work in sufficient time for proper review and submittal by that date. We propose to conduct the work on an hourly basis with the fee for each major task to not exceed the budget on the attached spreadsheet. We have estimated the level of involvement for Task 1.0 (Create Support Information) based on the requirements of the Cooperative Agreement Process. For Task 2.0 (Prepare Signal Plans and Specifications), we have estimated the work effort based on our two most recent signal design jobs for the Mn/DOT Metro Division. We have found that signal design with the Metro Division requires a significant amount of coordination and multiple reviews and we have included that in the proposal. Task 3.0 of the proposal (Provide Construction Administration) includes Westwood inspection led by Tom Walsh, Senior Construction Coordinator, who is Mn/DOT certified in Signal and Lighting Inspection as well as several other categories. Task 3.0 also includes a base level of signal coordination to fit the new signal into the existing timing patterns along T.H. 169 that Westwood developed in 1993. It does not include a full retiming of the corridor, but it does include the necessary field work to observe and fine tune the signal settings that are implemented. 2- Westwood Professional Services,Inc.is en equal opportunity employer. A Mr. Rodney W.Rue,P.E. October 16, 1996 Page 2 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL Westwood is prepared to begin work on this project as soon as we receive our notice to proceed. To initiate work, we request that you sign and return one copy of this proposal, approving its terms. We shall then begin work immediately. Thank you again for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Sincerely, CONDITIONS ACCEPTED BY: WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 0,42 C Ccccill �J - .(Jl��t'1�1G.t� Allan S. Klugman, P.E. Vice President, Transportation Services Signed Title Date Signed Title Date Attachments: Current Fee Schedule S Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Scope of Services Estimate Traffic Engineering Services- I.C. 96-5398 T.H. 169 and Fountain Place Eden Prairie, Minnesota Labor Hours Principal Senior Senior Traffic Engineer Engineer Tech./Constr. Technician Specialist Total Hours Coordinator Task 1.0 Create Support Information 1.1 Gather Support Information 2 2 1.2 Prepare Sketch Layout/Base for Final Design 4 8 8 20 1.3 Prepare SJR 12 4 16 1.4 Develop Preliminary Cost Estimate 2 2 Task 2.0 Prepare Signal Plans and Specifications 2.1 Conduct Operational Review 2 2 2.2 Prepare Preliminary Plans 20 16 16 2.3 Identify Easements and Right-of-Way 2 6 2.4 Review Preliminary Layout with Mn/DOT 4 2.5 Develop Interconnect to other Adjacent Signals 4 4 2.6 Prepare Final Plans 12 4 8 2.7 Prepare Specifications 12 2.8 Prepare Cost Estimate 2 2.9 Design Coordination with Mn/DOT 8 8 Task 3.0 Provide Construction Administration 6.1 Assist in Bidding/Award Process 8 8 6.2 Review Shop Drawings 4 4 6.3 Conduct Construction Staking and Observation 12 50 62 1 _ _ 6.4 Prepare and Implement Signal Timing 8 8 6.5 Prepare Contractor Payments 6 2 8 6.6 Prepare and Submit Record Drawings 2 8 10 Total Labor Hours 116 10 78 50 6 260 Hourly Rates $91.00 $79.00 $59.00 $51.00 $40.00 Total Labor Cost Estimate for Project $10,556.00 $790.00 $4,602.00 $2,550.00 $240.00 $18,738.00 Summary of Costs by Task Task 1.0 Create Support Information $2,860.00 Task 2.0 Prepare Signal Plans and Specifications $8,896.00 Task 3.0 Provide Construction Administration $6,982.00 Total Project Cost $18,738.00 TH169Fount.xis 10/16/96 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 14180 Trunk Hwy. 5 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 612-937-5150 FAX 612-937-5822 FEE SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1996 The following is the fee schedule for all work performed under an hourly per diem agreement. Charges for Other Direct Costs, Outside Services, and facilities furnished by Westwood are computed on the basis of actual cost plus 15 percent. Classification Hourly Rate Sr. Principal 108.00 Principal 91.00 Senior Project Engineer, Planner, Traffic Engineer 79.00 Registered Surveyor, Engineer 68.00 Sr. Environmental Scientist, Project Coordinator 68.00 Senior Construction Coordinator, Senior Design Technician 59.00 Design Engineer, Surveyor, Environmental Scientist 59.00 Computer Draftsperson, Survey Coordinator, Crew Chief 51.00 Graduate Engineer, Planner/LA 49.00 Engineering Technician, Survey Technician 45.00 Instrument Person 40.00 Associate Planner/L.A 40.00 Traffic Specialist 40.00 Word Processing, Engineering Aide 35.00 Expert Witness-Court Appearance/Deposition 2 x rate • No charge for mileage within the Twin City Metro area • No charge for in-house computer or plotter time(excluding color graphic plotting) • There is a finance charge of 1.25%per month(15%annual percentage rate)applied to all charges which have become more than 30 days past due based on billing date shown on original invoice. Westwood Professional Services.Inc.Is an equal opporsuney employer. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-5-96 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS (� ITEM NO. v, (� . DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger CAMP EDENWOOD Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: • Approve the Resolution for Site Plan Review. • Direct staff to prepare the Developer's Agreement. Background: This item was continued at the October 1, 1996 City Council meeting following the finding from the State Historical Preservation Office that some of Camp Edenwood's existing buildings were found to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The Council asked that the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)review the matter and return the project to the Council with its recommendations. The HPC reviewed the project at its October 21, 1996 meeting. The recommendations of the Commission and additional information is attached. In addition, an alternative site analysis is attached to identify the pros and cons of a relocated dining hall, while preserving the existing structure. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Site Plan Review 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated September 9, 1996 3. City Council Minutes dated October 1, 1996 4. Staff Report dated September 6, 1996 5. HPC report and recommendations 6. Alternate site analysis I CAMP EDENWOOD CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR CAMP EDENWOOD BY FRIENDSHIP VENTURES WHEREAS, Friendship Ventures has applied for Site Plan approval of Camp Edenwood on 2 acres for construction of a 15,000 square foot dining hall, located at 6350 Indian Chief Road which is zoned Public; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its September 9, 1996, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its October 1, 1996 and November 5, 1996,meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Friendship Ventures for the construction of a 15,000 square foot dining hall, based on plans dated September 24, 1996, between Friendship Ventures and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 1, 1996 Page 5 D. CAMP EDENWOOD by Friendship Ventures. Request for Site Plan Review on 2 acres. Location: Indian Chief Road. (Resolution Site Plan Review) Mike Maile, Director of Development for Friendship Ventures, reviewed the proposal to build a 15,000 square foot dining hall and associated parking lot at Camp Edenwood. Enger said the project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their September 9, 1996, meeting and recommended approval on a unanimous vote, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of September 6, 1996. There was some discussion that the original camp complex at Camp Edenwood may be eligible for designation as an historic site. Because of the issue of designation as an historic site, he said Staff recommends that Friendship Venture representatives meet with staff members to discuss alternative sites and to see what course of action should be followed with the construction of the facility. The Historic Preservation Commission (H.P.C.) should have an opportunity to review the project at their October 21, 1996, meeting, and make a recommendation regarding the proposal. Lambert said the Parks Commission reviewed the project on September 16, 1996, and recommended approval on a 5-0-1 vote with Jacobson abstaining. They also discussed the issue of designation as an historic site. He said Ed Stracke, president of Friendship Ventures, said there are not a lot of alternatives on this site, and they are not interested in maintaining the building as an historic site. They have been given some deadlines from the state health commission to upgrade the facility. He thought it was a good idea for the H.P.C. the project; however, he was not sure anybody will recommend preserving the site. Harris asked what the possibility is that it will really be designated as an historic site, and what opportunities exist for alternative use of the building if it were so designated. Maile said the maintenance of the building is far beyond their financial capabilities, and the Health Department has said they must upgrade the facility in order to continue operations. He said the building has changed from its original plan, and the cost would be very high to preserve building. They don't have a common area for kids to gather indoors if it rains. Harris noted this is a community service and a community resource that serves individuals with disabilities. Maile said they have tried to minimize the tree loss in the plans and will replace the trees at 50% greater than requirements. He noted they have already received a $50,000 contribution for the project from the Eden Prairie Lions Club. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 1, 1996 Page 6 Case asked who will own the building if Edenwood puts it up. Lambert said the City will technically own the building. They have had some discussions with the staff of Friendship Ventures and would like to reevaluate the lease agreement to make sure they have an extensive long-term lease. They want to get approval of the plans and then go out to raise funds for the building. Case asked what the terms of the lease are. Lambert said it is $1.00 for 30 years, and we are five or six years into the 30-year lease. City Attorney Pauly said the property must be used for these purposes, and, if not, it reverts back to Hennepin County. Lambert said our main goal for getting the facility was to provide a place for recreational use for the handicapped. Pidcock said she was not sure what the memo we received this afternoon from the State Historical Preservation Office means. Enger said he thought we have plenty of time to review this more thoroughly before construction begins, because the memo from the state means that this does need to go to the H.P.C. and receive their recommendation. Because there is no alternative site for the building, our recommendation may be to simply document the facility. • Case thought it was important to have a buffer of a couple of weeks to allow review by the H.P.C., to allow John Gertz more time to connect, and to have more time to think about the tradeoffs of history versus the program this provides. He was concerned because this is one of the few buildings we have that qualifies for the National Registry. Harris noted the October 21st meeting of the H.P.C. falls within the timing of 2nd Reading so we could approve this tonight and have the additional input available prior to 2nd Reading. Thorfinnson then asked what we are proposing if it does qualify for historic designation and we are faced with leaving it there and building some place else or discontinuing the program. Case was not sure there isn't another alternative. Thorfinnson was also concerned about how we got through the entire process to this point if there was really an issue. Proponent has gone through the entire process and now needs to be able to raise funds. He asked how long this has been in the process. Enger said it has been about 45 days, and the identification of this as a possible historic site occurred as a result of the development review process. Lambert said Staff has determined that we are looldng at site plan review so there is no 2nd reading. We would be able to approve the plan or we could continue the hearing for two weeks. Pauly said approval will require four votes and, since it does not change the zoning district, it would not require a 2nd Reading. Case thought we will end up with the same plan; however, he wants to be able to go back and say we thoroughly researched the issue. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to continue the Public Hearing to the first meeting in November. Motion carried unanimously. y Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 C. CAMP EDENWOOD by Friendship Ventures. Request for Site Plan Review on 2 acres. Location: Indian Chief Road. Ed Stracke, president of Friendship Ventures, reviewed his development proposal with the Commission. He gave background information noting that Edenwood Center is sometimes referred to as Camp Edenwood and has been in operation since 1958. It started as a day camp and has turned into a year round camp. They are a non-profit organization. In January 1985 they took over a lease on the property that's owned by the City of Eden Prairie from Hennepin County and transferred that to Friendship Ventures. They continue as a camp and retreat center for disabled adults and children. The proposed building is a multi-purpose program center. It's purpose is to replace four structures which include an area for food preparation, dining, indoor activity area,restrooms and storage. The new dining hall will be placed in the same location as the existing dining hall. This location will minimize tree loss and site alteration. They will be using the entrance way on the existing property because there is very little impact on the existing facility in terms of tree loss, water runoff, and grading. Sandstad was concerned about the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Society and how it was initiated. Kipp indicated consultants from the Historical Society contacted his office and indicated they were doing a survey of state facilities that treated tuberculosis in the turn of the century. They flagged this structure as one of them and indicated they were going to do an evaluation of the site. Ismail asked if the expansion will increase the number of clients and who are the clients. Stracke indicated it will increase the number of clients they are able to serve on a year round basis. It will not significantly increase the number of total clients that they can serve at any one time. In the summer they serve about 50 to 60 clients and most of those are resident clients who are dropped off for a week and they care for them and provide recreation. During the non-summer months they are limited to 30 clients because they can not feed a large group of people at any one time. They have housing accommodations for 50 to 60 people but can not feed them all. Their clients are children and adults with disabilities. The Public Hearing was opened. Brice Holasek, 6602 Old Shady Oak Road, asked if one of the houses was moved from another location a few years back. Stracke indicated it was and they were not operators of the facility at that time. 13 S Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 Foote commented it's a nice area and supported the project. Sandstad said it looks great and supported the project. Kipp noted that all the comments he heard from the neighbors had been good. MOTION 1: Foote moved, seconded by Habicht, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Foote moved, seconded by Habicht,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Friendship Ventures for Site Plan Review on 2 acres based on plans dated September 6, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 6, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. 14 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: September 6, 1996 SUBJECT: Eden Wood Camping and Retreat Center APPLICANT: Friendship Ventures FEE OWNER: City of Eden Prairie LOCATION: 6350 Indian Chief Road REQUEST: Site Plan Review on 2 acres ' , . i \ . 1 ---.f i r V'. N 5 H I P 1.../ -- 3 , g, �� � . s / £fix smic '.? ACa3 / 1 , i ■ �► ■s arlii-* ftip / . ■ 1141111 �` . / 4 / . . .4 . . • • ( • , , .:......: . • 6 , ::.:::) IIijP! • v. —151:7- lir 11, 8 *IL' • x:i:; :;i:t4:;44:;1.,0; ; . , . jl'_.#0 "\*.: "I'll'. 0 iiiiG?*?' ' ,S�Vrollt . .>VA Air. Sais:1 � `'ram INKH BIRO ‘,.. le* • O APP:', : . / r ill 111114"14- STRATFDRD RD. P ' . istS. 4 SNP , _ gmi, . . Li Iii . �� \ ._ 4414,1 . . _.„...,40.. .... ,3- _i_ . - op - ... , . is 1,.., . $V PS:1.1%eicitil. : = II ma 111Pum. s • 4Itals4 _ S - • *Alp ....?.. . , Es RT5 vc°1-7s1 '. .., # dion --crimi , r, r. . . .. imp ,-,. . . i :. s k, 1.,.. 1 4,, .^-11*On, di ,.. . - . ; ..., .Pi N 10, 701 i, . tot. ‘ .34 \ NI /.nimos• r •• ! .. 41.0 } � l a p*1.1.44 4 . .. ... co V)*. .- irt A.p gpat • * • 441 5 III - AZug�k4 1 NII4**4 64 Nit i if AS i';" 111 _ \. .,--- ik, iir ,. ' •%. 1:= ,ill . / ,., * • 'WO iii4pA ' ' - ROWNDRIVE yoff ... 0 , Mil . 4 g 1 in -, , ... Mu • a gvAll ale 111°11 ''''''' • - 446' — or II •,- Yi#.> IPO vielfillIr i .1 go ?.-c *4 ,., . i.... * ;,# _ . ii 41! • t„ N s . 4* i MP .st • ♦ SA* Staff Report Eden Wood Camping and Retreat Center September 6, 1996 BACKGROUND The Guide Plan identifies this site as Public Open Space. The property is zoned Public. Surrounding land uses consist of Glen Lake Golf and Practice Center to the north(currently under construction), BFI Recycling Center and Midwest Asphalt to the east, zoned industrial, the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul Railroad and additional Hennepin County property to the south, and Birch Island Lake to the west. The site has been used as a camp for many years, including during the existence of the Glen Lake Sanitorium. Hennepin County has conveyed this property to the City. The City maintains a lease agreement with Friendship Ventures for the continued use of the property as a camp and retreat center for the developmentally challenged and other disadvantaged youth. In 1987, a moving permit was issued to move a house from the old Arteka site (Northwest Swim and Racquet)to this site near Indian Chief Road. This house is now the administrative office for the camp. SITE PLAN The total land area of the property is 52 acres. The camp is located on approximately a 2 acre portion of the property immediately adjacent to Birch Island Lake, and the railroad. The site plan depicts the construction of a new two story 15,000 sq.ft. dining hall and associated parking lot area. The existing dining hall does not meet current Department of Health requirements, and will be demolished. All building setbacks meet City code. The Public zoning district does not specify a maximum base area ratio or floor area ratio requirement. However,based on the overall site area,the building coverage will be low. The existing parking lot area is not paved. A new hard surfaced drive aisle and 40 paved parking spaces will be provide for the project. Parking requirements for this unique use is not defined by City code. In these circumstances, parking is based on the needs of the use. Since the clients of the camp are brought to the site by bus,parking has been based on staff and visitor needs, as defined by the camp administrator. GRADING/DRAINAGE Minimal alteration of the site will be necessary. A tree inventory has been provided for the 2 acre portion of the property. Based on this acreage, total significant tree loss is 14%, or 255 caliper inches. Factoring in the remaining acreage and tree cover for the property, tree loss is estimated at approximately 5%. This would require replacement of 16 caliper inches. The landscaping plan provides 24 caliper inches of tree replacement, meeting the code requirement. All storm water run-off will be directed to a storm water drainage basin proposed on the north side of the new parking area. 2 9' Staff Report Eden Wood Camping and Retreat Center September 6, 1996 UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water is currently connected to the administration building near Indian Chief Road. The existing dining hall uses a cesspool. The State Plumbing Code does not permit the use of this cesspool. In addition, the Public zoning district requires the use of municipal sewer and water. The proposal depicts the extension of municipal sewer and water to the new dining hall, meeting code SHORELAND ORDINANCE Birch Island Lake is classified as a Recreational Development Water by the DNR. The shoreland ordinance requires structures to maintain at least a 200 foot setback from this water body. The proposed dining hall will be setback approximately 300 feet from the ordinary high water level, meeting City code. In addition, the shore and bluff impact zones (considered to be one half of the structure setback) will not be impacted by this proposal. HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE All the buildings associated with the original camp are currently being evaluated by the Minnesota Historical Society(MHS) for National Register of Historic Places eligibility. According to the consultant working for MHS,the camp is associated with the Glen Lake Sanitorium(demolished) and was a care facility for children at risk of developing tuberculosis. The determination of National Register eligibility will be done through the MHS State Historic Preservation Office,possibly by mid-September. If Camp Eden Wood is found eligible,the City will need to discuss development plans with MHS. Delays in the proposed development for the camp would likely result from a determination of National Register eligibility. City Staff has requested that the MHS complete its determination of eligibility as soon as possible. ARCHITECTURE The new dining hall will be placed in the same location as the existing dining hall. This location will minimize tree loss and site alteration. The building will be 15,000 sq.ft. in size and will maintain a residential look with the use of a pitch roof, and walkout design. Building materials will consist of asphalt shingles, wood siding, and the use of at least 75% face brick and glass as required in the Public zoning district. LANDSCAPING Based on the building size, a total of 47 caliper inches of landscaping is required. The proposed 3 Id Staff Report Eden Wood Camping and Retreat Center September 6, 1996 building will be replacing the existing dining hall, thus no significant gain in building square footage is proposed for the site. In addition, the camp has planted a number of evergreen trees on the property over the last few years far exceeding the total caliper inch requirement of the landscaping code, therefore, no additional planting is recommended. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of Site Plan Review on 2 acres, based on plans dated September 6, 1996, this report, and the following: 1. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. B. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the drip line of all trees to be preserved near the grading limits of the development. Said fencing shall be field inspected by the City Forester prior to any grading. 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150%of the cost of the landscaping improvements indicated on the approved plan. B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. C. Submit building material colors and samples for review by the City Planner. D. Obtain demolition permits, cap existing wells and septic systems. g:gaskawtt4epott.\camp. 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: September 12, 1996 SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Report to the September 6, 1996 Planning Staff Report for Edenwood Camping and Retreat Center BACKGROUND: The development proposal is being brought forth by Friendship Ventures to make improvements to the Edenwood Camp and Retreat Center. The site is currently property that was conveyed to the City of Eden Prairie by Hennepin County and was formerly known as Camp Indian Chief. The City has a lease arrangement with Friendship Ventures for use of the property as a camp and retreat center for those who are developmentally challenged or disabled. The entire site is over 50 acres in size; however, the camp portion is located on a relatively small portion of the property adjacent to Indian Chief Road and the Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul Railroad tracks. NATURAL RESOURCES ISSUES Tree Loss/Landscaping The staff has visited the site to evaluate the proposed new driveway and building expansion. Based on the tree inventory that was proposed for the two-acre camp site,the staff has identified 14 trees that would be lost due to construction. The trees that would be lost include some large red oak, sugar maple, basswood, and green ash. In calculating the tree loss, the staff compared the 255 diameter inches of trees lost due to construction with the number of trees indicated on the two-acre camp site. This resulted in a 14% loss of significant trees. However, a more appropriate way of comparing it is to take a look at the entire 50 acre site, and at that point the staff calculated that the tree loss would only be 5% of the significant trees on the site. The replacement required by ordinance would be 16 caliper inches of trees and the landscaping plan that was submitted provides 24 inches of tree replacement meeting code requirements. The trees that are being put in are slightly different from the existing trees, however, they are designed to provide for some varied visual interest on the front of the building. Trees that have been selected include thornless honey locust, Colorado spruce, and Norway maple. 1 114 NURP Pond Because this site is putting in a bituminous surface for a driveway and parking areas, a NURP pond is required. However,the Engineering Department has evaluated the site for suitability of such a pond and has made recommendation that a holding pond be constructed. This pond would be adjacent to the lowest area of the site where currently all storm water collects. It is felt that because of the high porosity of the soils in this area that most of the storm water runoff generated would go into this pond for a short period of time before percolating into the ground. If at sometime in the future the bottom of the pond became sealed,the staff would recommend taking steps to install a culvert outlet to match NURP pond standards, which simply state that no water will be discharged off the site or into a wetland at a greater rate than what naturally occurs. Sidewalks/Trails There are no public trails or sidewalks associated with this project. Currently, the camp has an internal series of informal hiking and walking trails-44e for use by campers only. Wetland Protection Currently, there is a wetland on a portion of the camp; however,this site will not be impacted by any of the grading or construction work. Steps are being taken by the proponent to make sure that new sewer and water services are brought into the site to handle the fresh and waste water demands needed for the new building, as well as any future expansion on the site. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 9, 1996 meeting and was approved as per staff recommendations in the Planning Staff Report. Staff would recommend the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission approve the Camp Edenwood dining hall replacement plan as per the Planning Commission recommendations and information included in this supplemental staff report. SAF:mdd CampEden/Stu96 2 /18 Approved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission IV. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Edenwood Camping and Retreat Center Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated September 12, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a Staff Report dated September 6, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Ed Stricke, president of Friendship Ventures, reviewed his development proposal with the Commission. This plan represents a portion of the property that is owned by the City that they lease. They run programs for children and adults with disabilities. The major developments are the road coming into the main portion of the property, constructing a new year round program center,dining hall, and replacing four old structures. The plan has very little overall impact in terms of the environment. At the recommendation of staff, they changed the orientation of the building slightly to save more trees on the lake front area. The tree loss for the entire park site is about 5 percent. The access road is a paved road with parking. The lines go very well with the natural topography of the site. Currently there is runoff into a holding pond area and there is not any likelihood of overflow into the wetland area. Fox reviewed the Staff Report with the Commission. This area was given to the City of Eden Prairie by Hennepin County when they wanted to get out of the property lease business. There is a long term lease as long as the property is used as it was when it was taken over, and that was for handicapped activity for youths and adults. This particular site is a relatively small area of the entire 37 acres. Staff calculated a total of 14 trees would be lost due to construction in that area. The architect made some adjustments due to staffs recommendation of shifting the building to save the large mass of trees to the west. They did not inventory the whole area but estimate tree loss to be about 5 percent of significant trees. The trees that are being put in are slightly different from the existing trees; however,they are designed to provide for some varied visual interest on the front of the building. The NURP pond mentioned is not technically a NURP pond but a depression to collect storm water. This has been looked at by the Engineering Department and they feel it does meet the standards. However, at some time in the future if the sedimentation basin became clogged, they may want to look at some type of discharge pipe. There is no need for any sidewalks or 6 • 1IC Approved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission trails. The camp has their own internal trails and sidewalk system mainly of gravel. The public does not access this area at all. There is no grading into the wetlands and new sewer and water services must be brought into this site because there currently is a septic system. It's being brought into the site to handle the fresh and waste water demands needed for the new building, as well as any future expansion on the site. Bowman was concerned that the tree calculation was determined on the entire 37 acres versus two and a half acres. Stricke explained that there may be future development but most of the 53-acre site is not land mass. A lot of that is wetland and lake, and part of the property goes out into the middle of Birch Island Lake. They are interested in retaining as much open space as possible for tree space with vegetation. There is no interest in building buildings to cover the entire ground because they need the open space for their programs and activities. This building is replacement of an existing building and any future development would fall under that category. The new building is slightly larger than the existing one but it replaces four structures instead of one. Koenig was concerned about the Historical Preservation Society. Stricke replied at this point there has been no determination as to the historical significance of the two structures they were concerned about. At this point they're determining whether it meets minimum criteria to be considered historical. MOTION: Brown moved, seconded by Koenig, to approve recommendations as per Staff Report of September 12, 1996 for the improvements of the dining hall. Motion carried 5-0-1 with one abstention by Jacobson. B. The Hills of Eden Prairie Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated September 12, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources., and a Staff Report dated September 6, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Dave Pavelka, owner and developer, reviewed his development proposal with the Commission and gave a brief history about the land owned by his grandfather for 93 years. He explained there are three hills. One is the high hill near the entrance, one is a low hill in the center, and there's an area that's a medium size hill which they call the oak knoll. In the 93 years his 7 if 0 City of Eden Prairie T - t City Offices x.., 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Phone (612) 949-8300 • TDD (612) 949-8399 • Fax (612) 949-8390 August 30, 1996 Rolf Anderson 212 W. 36th Street Minneapolis, MN 55408 SUBJECT: Camp Edenwood Retreat Center Dear Mr. Anderson: Thank you for calling me regarding the Camp Edenwood Retreat Center. The City recently received a development proposal for the camp from Friendship Ventures which leases the property from the City. Demolition of the dining hall and several nearby buildings are being considered along with a new replacement dining hall, road, parking lot, and utilities. As I mentioned in our conversation on the 27th, the City owns the property, which is also contiguous to Birch Island Park. Friendship Ventures has a lease agreement with the City to operate a resident, day or outpost camping - recreation program for developmentally challenged children and adults within Hennepin County. I believe the camp has served in this capacity for over 30 years. It was very interesting to learn from you that prior to this recent use the camp served children at risk of tuberculosis and was affiliated with the Glen Lake Sanitorium. Unfortunately, none of the City's recent cultural resource survey's included Camp Edenwood. It is apparent that an important historic property was missed. To assist you in completing your evaluation of Camp Edenwood, you should be aware of the current development review schedule for the camp. It should go as follows: September 9th Planning Commission October 1st City Council - 1st Reading November 5th City Council -2nd Reading Considering the historical significance of the camp, the Heritage Preservation Commission should also review and comment on the proposed demolition of existing camp buildings. The Heritage Preservation Commission meets September 16th. • r2 If you find that the camp is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, then I recommend that determination be made as soon as possible. If you have any questions, or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at 949- 8454. Sincerely, i0Mr �. ohn Gertz Historic Preservation Specialist cc: Dennis Gimmestad Government Programs and Compliance Officer, Minnesota Historical Society Sherry Butcher-Younghans, HPC Chair Heritage Preservation Commission Elizabeth Thompson, Friendship Ventures 13 MEMORANDUM TO: Eden Prairie City Council FROM: Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: October 29, 1996 SUBJECT: Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendations for Glen Lake Children's Camp/Edenwood Center FINDINGS Historical Significance The Heritage Preservation Commission(HPC)reviewed the report and National Register of Historic Places eligibility recommendation for the Glen Lake Children's Camp submitted by historical consultant Rolf Anderson(attached). About two weeks ago,the State Historic Preservation Office staff in St. Paul also reviewed Mr. Anderson's report and concurred with his findings and determined that the Glen Lake Children's Camp is eligible for listing on the National Register under Criterion A. It is also the opinion of the HPC that the camp is eligible for inclusion on the National Register. Furthermore,the Camp is eligible for listing as a local Heritage Site in accordance with City Code, Ordinance No. 38-90. Specifically, under local ordinance,the Glen Lake Children's Camp meets Criteria 1 and 2 which state: 1. It has character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, State of Minnesota or the United States. 2. Its location as the site of a significant historic event. According to the City Code, Ordinance No. 38-90, it is only necessary that a Heritage Site meet one(1)or more of the eight(8) criteria listed, (Finding of Significance attached). Based on the fmdings of Mr.Anderson, concurrence of the State Historic Preservation Office, and the HPC, the Glen Lake Children's Camp clearly represents a valuable,irreplaceable historic resource. In addition, Section 11.05, Subdivision 1 states the following: 1 I14 Declaration of Public Policy and Purpose. The Council of the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter the "Council")declares as a matter of public policy that the preservation,protection,perpetuation and use of areas,places, buildings, structures, and other objects have historic, aesthetic or community interest or value, benefits the health,prosperity, education and welfare of the community. The purposes of this chapter are to: (1) Safeguard the heritage of the City by preserving sites and structures which reflect significant elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political,visual or architectural history; (2)Promote the preservation and continued use of historic sites and structures for the education and general welfare of the people of the City; and(3) Foster civic pride in the beauty and notable accomplishments of the past. Because the Glen Lake Children's Camp represents such a singularly unique historic resource, the HPC feels that this Council should consider alternatives that protect the Camp's historic features, yet will fully accommodate the current users facility and program needs. City staff has included three(3) alternative site options (attached) that could be explored further. The City Council should consider the benefits and value of protecting and preserving known historic resources before permitting their destruction,particularly since the buildings are City property. Integrity From a preservation standpoint, integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance. The seven(7) aspects of integrity are: • location • design • setting • materials • workmanship • feeling • association To be listed in the National Register of Historic Places, a property must meet National Register criteria and must have integrity. The Glen Lake Children's Camp conveys a high degree of integrity,which combined with its known historical associations leaves no doubt about its National Register eligibility. The HPC also requested the City Director of Inspections provide a structural evaluation and report on the camp buildings. This was completed October 16 (report attached). This inspection was done with the idea of converting the buildings to year round use, which is not the recommendation of the HPC. Many of the deficiencies noted in the report are maintenance issues 2 '5 and appear to be caused by negligence in performing cyclical maintenance. Despite the need for maintenance, these buildings are in fact in good condition. The Inspections Department has estimated the cost of demolition of the dining hall to be approximately $7,000. The Inspections Department has also provided estimated costs associated with various rehabilitation options of the existing dining hall. These costs reflect an intuitive analysis,and may vary based on detailed analysis. STABILIZATION OPTIONS - Leave as is future demolition cost Short-term $10,000 - $15,000 -reroof -repair siding -window repair - Long-term -repair foundation $40,000 - $60,000 -repair siding -new roof system -window replacement -replace rotted/decaying material -electrical upgrades ADAPTIVE USE OPTION - Complete renovation -all long-term items identified above Costs based on specific use -insulation of building-comparable -ADA access to new costruction costs -municipal utilities -repair/removal of fireplace -heating system -replace foundation -interior wall covering -rest rooms HPC recommendations for the Glen Lake Children's Camp, as an initial step, are establishment of a cyclical maintenance program to stabilize present conditions and prevent continued decline due 3 to deferred maintenance("short term"option). The HPC further recommends that the building be studied for additional use options as the long range goal. The buildings do not require costly historic restoration and the HPC is not recommending any. The cost estimates provided are for building rehabilitation. Funding for Rehabilitation If the City Council would direct the Heritage Preservation Commission to pursue funding for planning and rehabilitation of the camp buildings,the following sources are available to the HPC/City. • CLG (Certified Local Government) Grant Available to HPC's through the State Historic Preservation Office. Funds could be used to prepare a reuse study for the camp, including rehabilitation plans and costs. • State Grant-in-Aid State funds made available through the Minnesota Historical Society. Funds are used for preservation projects including the rehabilitation of historic buildings. Other grant sources are available, e.g.,ISTEA,however,the above mentioned options are specifically established for preservation of historic resources and the HPC has successfully secured these grants for the past five(5)years. RECOMMENDATION The Heritage Preservation Commission recommends the following for City Council consideration: (1) Preserve and Protect the Glen Lake Children's Camp. Consider alternate sites which do not include demolition of the existing dining hall and garage. With Friendship Venture's program and facility needs met in the new building,the old dining hall could serve a City recreational need. The HPC recommends considering adaptive use for the old dining hall. The Commission feels that the preservation of the existing camp buildings should not be construed to mean that the children and adults using the camp will be negatively impacted. (2) If after considering all options to the demolition of the Glen Lake Children's Camp,the Council feels destruction of the buildings is the only option,the HPC recommends the following conditions: 4 • Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit for the property, Friendship Ventures provide documentation verifying secured funds for the construction of the new building, and have applied for a building permit. • Prior to issuance of a demolition permit,the entire historic camp be documented according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Architectural and Engineering Documentation,Federal Register,pages 44730-44734. Cost estimate: $5,000.00 • Prepare a plan for the cyclical maintenance of all remaining historic structures,buildings, and objects remaining extant at Edenwood Center. BARB\JOHN\CMPEDEN.CC 5 October 9, 1996 Rolf T. Anderson 212 West 36th Street Minneapolis, MN 55408 John Gertz City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd Eden Prairie, MN Dear John: Enclosed is a brief synopsis of both the history of the Glen Lake Children's Camp and historic contexts associated with the property. Additional information about the site is in the process of being gathered. As you may know, I am an historical consultant under contract with the State Historic Preservation Office of the Minnesota Historical Society to conduct an evaluation of three sites in Minnesota associated with the treatment of tuberculosis, one of which was the Glen Lake Children's Camp. The site has been determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The camp is a rare and unique site which is unlikely to have many counterparts anywhere in the United States. I would be happy to work with the City of Eden Prairie and Friendship Ventures, which now utilizes the site, in order to find a solution that preserves the historic significance of the Glen Lake Children's Camp and also meets the needs of current user. I know the State Historic Preservation Office is also willing to offer their professional services as well. Sincerely, Rolf T. Anderson Survey Results and Evaluation Glen Lake Children ' s Camp The Glen Lake Children's Camp is located at 6350 Indian Chief Road, also known as Birch Island Road, in western Hennepin County, in the present day City of Eden Prairie. The camp is located on the grounds of Hennepin County' s Glen Lake (tuberculosis) Sanatorium which was razed in its entirely, with the exception of the Children's Camp, by the county in 1993. The camp is located south of the site of the main complex and consists of about a 12 acre site on the eastern shore of Birch Island Lake. The camp includes a Dining Hall and Recreation Building, a large Dormitory, one Garage, a Stone Monument, all from the period, and possibly an additional garage from the period. There are also four buildings from the modern era on the site, as well as a late 19th or early 20th century farmhouse which was moved to the site. The camp was constructed in 1925 and was a continuation of a camp for tuberculous children established in the summer of 1906 at West River Road and Lake Street by Mrs. George H. (Leonora Hall) Christian. Twenty-two children were registered. In 1909 this camp was transferred to Glenwood Park (Theodore Wirth) where it was operated by the Visiting Nurses Association. A site for a permanent camp was sought and Glen Lake Sanatorium was the logical location.1 The Citizen's Aid Society, a foundation established by George H. Christian in 1918, funded the construction which totaled $12, 141.90.2 The camp was built in the spring of 1925 and opened on June 12, 1925. It includes of a large L-shaped Dining Hall and Recreation Building which overlooks the lake. The frame building is covered with a medium pitch hip roof and contains a large brick fireplace. The adjacent Dormitory is a long rectangular building with one wing for boys and one for girls which are separated by central staff quarters, bath rooms, and locker rooms. The building is covered with an intersecting hip roof. Initially there was space for 60 children, 30 in each wing. But shortly after construction two isolation rooms were partitioned off in each wing which reduced the total capacity from 60 to 54. However, it appears the camp usually exceeded that number. The camp was dedicated to Mr. 1J. Arthur Myers, Invited and Conquered: HistoricAl_Sketch of Tuberculosis in Minnesota, (St. Paul: Webb Publishing Company, 1949), pp. 406-407. 2Citizen's Aid Society, "Gifts from the Citizen's Aid Society," 1936. and Mrs. Christian who had both died by that time. An inscription on a large boulder at the camp reads as follows: "Glen Lake Children's Camp - Presented by the Citizen's Aid Society and Gratefully Dedicated to the Memory of Mrs. and Mrs. George H. Christian who Maintained the First Camp in Minneapolis and Whose Hope was for the Health and Happiness of all Children. " Architects of the camp were likely to have been the firm of Sund and Dunham which designed all the buildings at Glen Lake. The camp closed for the year on September 3, 1925, after 84 days of operation. It had a total of 3,839 patient days with an average daily attendance of 45.5 children. The camp was limited to children who reacted positively to a tuberculin (Mantoux) test and whose home conditions were such as to warrant special care. The camp was built . . .in order to provide a summer in the country for children infected with the tubercle bacillus, who, in the opinion of a physician, might need a summer to help them prevent their infection from developing into active disease. "3 With this goal in mind, children were encouraged to remain at the camp all summer. The camp generally opened the first Monday after school ended and closed one week before school resumed. The children ranged from ages 4 to 14 and there appeared to be roughly 75 children enrolled in the camp each summer. Camp admission records exist for the years 1925-1934, and discharge records for the years 1927-1934.4 From 1925-34 there were a total of 742 admissions to the camp, although this appears to represent 528 different children since children could return year after year. The readmissions would retain the same admission number. These records also indicate when a child would transfer to the Children's Building at the main sanatorium, presumably having developed active tuberculosis. In 1926 the Minneapolis B.P.O. Elks Lodge No. 44 donated three swings, two slides, three turning rods, seven teeters, and one ocean wave to the camp. A plaque affixed to the Dormitory acknowledges the donation. The daily routine included typical activities for a summer camp with various recreational activities and craft projects. The children were transported to Excelsior several times a week by truck to swim (Birch Island Lake was not suitable for swimming) . A movie was shown once a week in the Sanatorium Auditorium and certain activities were arranged between the summer camp children 3Glen Lake Sanatorium, Annual Report, 1935, p. 73. 4The admission records are located at the Minnesota Historical Society within the State Archives collection for Glen Lake Sanatorium. ace and some of the children from the main Children's Building. In the early years emphasis was placed on weight gain. Each year on the 4th of July Mrs. George C. Christian (daughter-in-law of Mr. and Mrs. George H. Christian) visited the camp and presented gifts and prizes. Annual and bi-annual reports for Glen Lake Sanatorium have been located for the years 1931-1943 which provide details about the camp from year to year. The report for the years 1940-41 noted that, "Both seasons were unusually successful and contributed much to the health of the future workers of this country. " The camp continued in operation through 1950. I have concluded that the Glen Lake Children's Camp is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places due to its significance in the following areas: There were two additional children's camps in Minnesota. A summer camp opened in 1908 in Cherokee Heights, West St. Paul, where Dr. H. Longstreet Taylor was medical director. This camp survived only two or three summers when after those residing in the neighborhood held a mass meeting in opposition to the camp. In 1910 the Eva Shapiro Memorial Camp was opened at White Bear Lake. It was built and maintained by the Ramsey County anti- tuberculosis committee with the Wilder Charities furnishing maintenance for some of the children. This camp, which accommodated 33 children, was discontinued in 1913. None of these camps are known to survive and thus the Glen Lake Children's Camp may be considered the sole surviving example of a very unique and rare property type: namely, a summer camp for children infected with tuberculosis. The camp would also be considered significant for its association with the treatment of tuberculosis in general. There are few surviving facilities state-wide associated with the treatment of TB and there are virtually no surviving facilities in Hennepin County. Glen Lake Sanatorium, Hopewell (Parkview) Hospital, Thomas Hospital, and Lymanhurst School are all believed to have been demolished. And the camp is the only surviving reminder of the extensive Glen Lake Sanatorium, a huge complex of buildings that became the largest sanatorium in Minnesota. Finally, the camp is significant for its association with George H. and Leonora Hall Children, early pioneers and philanthropists in the battle against TB. From the beginning of organized tuberculosis work the Christians pioneered many tuberculosis projects. In 1903 Mrs. Christian employed and the paid the salary of the first tuberculosis nurse in Minneapolis. The death of their own child to tuberculosis in 1906 intensified their efforts. The Christians built Thomas Hospital for tuberculosis and 21 presented it to the United Lutheran Society. Mrs. Christian also convinced the City of Minneapolis to establish a tuberculosis division in the city hospital and built Hopewell Cottage and maintained it for two years before the city assumed operation. Prior to her death in 1916 Leonora Hall Christian initiated plans for the construction of the Children's Building at Glen Lake Sanatorium. The building was funded at a cost of $156,203.43 by the Citizen's Aid Society, the Christian foundation. The building was dedicated to her memory and a plaque in the entrance read as follows: The Children's Sanatorium This Building is Affectionately Dedicated to the Memory of Leonora Hall Christian In Reverent Gratitude and Recognition of her Pioneer Work in the Control and Prevention of Tuberculosis Erected by the Citizen's Aid Society -- 1922 Designed by Sund and Dunham, the building represented the high point of the design of children's facilities in Minnesota. With its rooftop terraces and balconies cascading off the south facade, it represented an outstanding example of how architectural design was used to promote the treatment of tuberculosis. The final project by the Citizen's Aid Society at Glen Lake was the construction of the Surgical and Vocational Rehabilitation Wing in 1931 at a cost of $139,000.00. The foundation was self- liquidating and roughly half its million dollar endowment was spent on TB related projects. The Glen Lake Children's Camp represents the only extant project associated with George H. and Leonora Hall Christian involving the treatment of tuberculosis. The buildings at the camp retain a high degree of integrity with only minimal alterations. The buildings remain seasonal and have never been winterized. Several newer buildings have been introduced to the site, however. In about 1993 the camp was transferred from Hennepin County to the City of Eden Prairie. In recent years the camp has been used for programs for the developmentally disabled. The current lessee would like to demolish the Dining Hall and Recreation Building and construct a year-around structure. However, I believe this would destroy the eligibility of the site because not only would one of the two major resources be destroyed but another non-contributing building in the place of the Dining Hall would begin to overpower the site and the surviving Dormitory. 9/27/96 1 1 ' b , �» ,I. 1 .. • ,:i.... - ii",,,,:i5,1' ..`:-,,t ' °' ' ; Tuberculosis children have a warm sun porch in which to play nurse. They give their dolls all the sunlight possible to keep them from contracting the disease. rli'..; :,'L ` . tot a i.... / 11 { «€ � � ' ''''‘ IC -i v_. r UIOtti -1, 4 ill IP t, t, I. 1 _ - .`4,..:*". 4' 1 I ir - 1`r; ..,.... , ,,:.... , .. . Pneumothorax being administered by Dr.Mattill and Nurse Carol Leiux. : '2 ',. -,...:. ,_: '4 '• a / , . ,„_. . • , '''*' 'Ii ,,4, ., :. I' ( 1 „ :a a .� II i i n .. .,. r -' t __ fit, r� i• - '-'.,, 1 f' .-....„ . - r- ..b.LL.1,1,1,1 r...#1 Li,!'... 4,t, c A itiol,, . Lk',4 - - - ,j � 1" 'Rr t j.,,U U li J Ir ii y .�• Rest hour at Glen Lake Camp for Children The Children's Building San Memories 41 23 ' t ' ' 1 , • , ..- , 1‘, , ,• • 1, .5 '". . . • , ) k• - t*14 e . r%4:.7 • t,7 If'gi .1 ' .i ,11 I ',,• ...06 , ,4'' 4 . . 1 .,., ,, ll - • Cf.1 ' * .4; r .t ..,-. 41.1.1%s 4• ' '0,4 , , „. . .. . 1":„ . • ' '".•4 111' '•• ' • 4•••• Ae '.-t.:414,4•• •'•A_ * . '''''• ••• ' . • • t • 1 i- • V - r . t 41 IA'.4.A. 1, \ -yr' g •., . t -,.„'• ••• ' • ' .If '•.1. . 4.,. .•! 4 ".•• - - . . . . *. 1' r. :- - • . 1 ' ..:...1-il....'-.'.•‘'.'1.:...".---'...1.14.•../,',4.s.1...':,4..., .. • . , ,. 0z.:1...,; .... ;. ,. 1„, 4 .. • ..;.. .-,,, ...• i ,, . •N - .• r 7,."'r ,,,,. -,. 1,• - • 7 -t" . ' •se \ . .•17./.. .3 , ' i .r ...iie , * . ' • , , •..4. /W. .... .• • . • .. 4. • , .1• • . • ' ...,,, .,;,.• ,., • 3, •. ..,' .• . r rt..::„. _algt.___c f_is----4.',-.. ,,, i...,.. ,... ... . , ...• . . ••••.•••.. ... •,, .• r :: • . ,.--..\•.. .,,, • - o - it- et•• . , . •• of .% . • . • .- • ...„7 • • I . ., - 6%, ,'.• •,tf .i. • „""'-. ' ,....•, •4 ' ''''C‹. ,. , f .- • •- %, ir ,%,„....,,,. -•. . ''. -.4 '• ‘ir.. .... .... . • I ',211 .'. : i• :,„, . - V.- t:'":1-Ain-Wt., -- •- r t t ' ar. • • .• • • . . ' ,t-!: .,'\ ' • • , . .1 . ,trer;ri- ,. _...- ..t. . . • • . ... 401.0 • 1. -'• r i. I.* . •. gki .1 :it°. tt.•'elr7-4.,.....e:....1..:,•'.....-.4....,:a...1._: .-anl:(efla:,"5.....,."4..,.'*.t'l„111:....',_,_...... .....-4:‘,04.,,s,..1.1..::'''...;,.1.,,,.....i'1.:,...1.1.1.'tiof::".‘.'$1,A4-4,.:..:4:',•'•'7:„..4..•)",i71.:‘:.11;1.',‘.:......401...*: . s .% •\ " 144 1 - \\ 0,-',........_____________ \ '•:. ...%-41C.Ce c4. • " . •*6 • 'Pt N•c.4,1 ' 7 , . • .% . \ . t, ....,...„IP cri .. :,.. ,.., , , ,S •., , ..n 0111,i 1 I W - . '.. •.'. ' . 4. ire.......-•"•, .,L', „71 fot „.-..,a '''',•,*•it .?. , ..4k ;..;•:".,,, •• : . 44,,..!..:, . ....4- 4.! , .-).- ..... pre; . ,,, , ,....... .:•._ .1'140 4, ‘4,1 :,:. . s p.a.ea 1441 , o/k \ , ....., .,.... • .., C.% ., ..' .• ' ‘i •r-- >.• ' , .1 ., • • "''.4.• r‘ \ \‘‘ , - - i .„,...,....- '-e "-'''Ls'..;.16- • --...-:;,-‘•-- • , -.7.-•?:- 1 •-- \ . Ai, _ ,a,44. ..... .,.. _ . .4. ''':-..,Ziel-a---:•'' N t t i .-.:' VD 1... - 'i• • ' ,•'' ;A:i_ , _,_.,‘.4frI; 0.- -'4'4---_.--:,7.7-%•,.‘,- .-7 - "` " • ii‘ko • * ... '..IC1. --• ••• --- .,Pf -.•-i .4 4' ii 4 c,._.•..... e,:r4,i1K-r.• •;IA, . .--r• - -;4*/-',:!.,.i.1i4. .. - . . - - , • '''' ::::, , ,-.,.!..,..k,. • a I ' ' 4.116'it... • 14k -'• '- • yrec ,, . • I i • „ • I\ i • .-4•A•• ',.;. • •.,• ,,.- r- - #-I-iell :--01.,‘ 'y, .. • ...0%t, 4-6,4,- ,A -T, --,741;..,v-- : 4. .. v •i , .„,...iy. ,.. _ ., . ,,. ., ir (ffritifill 4`,.. .'''. -401.,,, •/44 #.,, ..• 444•_ .4•rt!-- ' • ' . J •_. .- p+it ' •,-,........4,, -..., -,..;..z.,-:: , ., . •- • --. - ...I..., .. : . •-: iff , , .7,414,‘ , k ,• ...2p.,...,:_•..-4-. . . .• it •; t. ,.. '.. .1 L'""!s. . 4•11111(11(1111111 I •'''.41.`-4...7.f, .• . ., •8" t' , '-1- Ers . .. • "1.-1 '.. . ' 6* ' 0 1 ', .-_.-• .„.,„ „,,. r s•• a , . ... ,, „z -•- • '• '1A" • :,,r'd,,.. -.11464,1r .• :• . •, • .,4•:17.C.4;;"";i' .,:.4"....- ' ..t.: , .. ..41, ; ., Nst....,4 ,,........ " .....• ,,,...0... .. . 6 . _ , A,....,.........,:„&-:, .4. ,...V 4... v't:::..t',1,, //.. , . 7.'3,„_, e. Lao' .. ._ ./*es , . '1C ,.• ..4; 1.: 4 ,11„,r.-• . •1 '.'" /.',4%,•,.t.. ' .;;:,.. T , -..• i••• " .1-4...: 'I:' •;.'i:. 1..,,‘‘. . ' f^S ••. •I 0.•,.•r •i' •IfelP. ;. 1•41,-.i..i• .'rav_14,.., ,:., :.....„... ,..,- . .,:,.., • --- . - -.: -• • 7 Z.:-. • • ' ... -..if r •,,,,$,L,!.,1 ,„,,ofte.,r.. .-..e, 0. - - •,..,- .,..,?..,-c.;• -• .:'''•;;' • ' . r , ,. . . ti . 'S*rt,N.' -.''7.'':• t'44..v‘4ifi.4 '-•<:ml, ,,* •,.., . --e•,• . -, iffl.t.,-•':,", q,,i,11:- '., 7 • . • -v , • ..417, '1.cia.viiiii- .• . .. ._ ‘•.•i. ..1A••".-.'' .,. • ,k'' •,4 „. - '----- A • All'Allireio:, :..•• ,.' '4. • n`, 4- ? ' t ..1t,,., :LI(',-4,4-• ;', 1:,',r-•1 _ r , t • 4. , , ., -;7-,'.1P• • re, P• • • -.4 ..-4. t•r• . 0 l ..4.1 ••• • .- , ,...- •..e.i‘..tii,k44{?-,V.,•• :.',1 e, 'VII''.. ;' Lit '1••• 4 'Ai.: te.tX.•.8,.,4,•...1.•••1,.''4, .'?:•,4*4-.,..„.•..••••`A;'is.t...°...4.^.'.4 )4'',-s;4 ..•a l'-.. „iii.r'•/•F• ,. 2., . ' , • , I g• . Nc•-• ...• -4•,.... -. .4.,;•.'1,01.4'-47,,,tir:',' "• ' , •• i f , .,- .r4., ... )..-: .•. ,.• • .,,,-r-wov",- i• •f•1,','' ‘' , , . e'' .7' i'.;;.. 41. ; • ir;,,11 It?ri':'. :fi ' • . • .. . • let 7' • • ' ' ' ••''' 1#' ....i"• 'f`, 'a • .ri• •Ae`•4! ''off•4 q .,•,,,,,,;(- . e„,, I, ' -- - - -.i,, 1 ....,,, ,,i_ v; s.,•. • ')/ iir-• J. I, ;• * : i d , • 31piet,:i• " it'', ..1*'•'" 1.:41r-• rt :ike r . • . '. i IVA: '' 4, ' , • '/ i . •-1 ''i • .•%,- • ifYir 44:,.. ,.„7•,, . ,.r,..:,•'- ,-,2v-.. '• C•„,, -,_, • , •...• •'•„, ,•i,,, *1 . ...i•••,,,•• , .., .•••‘ 4 ; : . je 4,- ,*-'1, ,•, L/4.,st v I,y , , . • • gi., • .•I:' 4 ..,, , 1 . - 3 ' I••,\ 44'. i. •••I A, 4„, , : ••--.• . ,. ' , 14 ei5 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION FINDING OF SIGNIFICANCE Resource Name: Glen Lake Children' s Camp Owner: City of Eden Prairie Location: 6350 Indian Chief Road • Street: • UTM: 1 I 1 Zone Easting Northing • PIN: N/A SHPO Site Number: N/A Resource Type: Buildings (3) object (1) Architectural Style/Type: Rustic Important Dates: 1925 Representation in Existing Surveys: Yes. State Historic Preservation Office Integrity: Good This property has been evaluated as substantially meeting the criteria for nomination to the City Register of Heritage Sites (see City Code Sec. 11.05 Heritage Preservation Sites). The applicable criteria are indicated below: [9 It has character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, State of Minnesota or the United States; TiIts location as the site of a significant historic event; O It has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in pre-history or history; O It is associated with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City; O It embodies distinctive characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment; O It represents the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City; O It embodies elements or architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation; or O Its unique location or singular physical characteristics represents an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the City. Attest: / — , October 29 , 1996 HPC�� erson / / Date AS Memorandum To: John Gertz, Historical Preservation Specialist From: Kevin Schmieg, Director of Inspections /�� Date: October 18, 1996 '/ Subject: Inspection of Buildings at Camp Edenwood The inspection I performed at Camp Edenwood included the kitchen/dining building, the shed, and the bunkhouse . It is my understanding that Friendship Ventures wishes to utilize the facility year round. The following is a list of deficiencies I found with the buildings . All of the items would need to be addressed in converting the facilities to year round use and many would need to be corrected to maintain the buildings in their current state . FOUNDATION: • No perimeter footings, the structure is placed on piers and as such difficult to protect plumbing pipes from freezing. . Several of the pier footings have been subjected to frost heaving. • No positive connection could be identified between the pier footings and the building floor system. FLOOR SYSTEM: • Not level due to frost heaving of pier footings • Rim joists have rotated causing withdrawal of joist nailing. ▪ Some members of the floor system are in the early stages of decay. ROOF FRAMING: • The roof system is cabled. The roof system should be analyzed for stability. ▪ Rafters are undersized for current code requirements . There is evidence of rafter deflection. ▪ With 2x4 rafters and no ceiling joists there is no place to install insulation without a reconfiguration of the roof framing. • Roof boards show signs of water damage and some of them are in varying stages of decay. ROOFING: ▪ The rolled roofing is poorly installed and in need of replacement . 2Cv Camp Edenwood Page 2 SIDING: ▪ Many of the siding boards are cracked and in need of replacement . WINDOWS : ▪ The windows are single pane glazing, not sealed or weather proof, and showing signs of decay. DOORS : • The doors are uninsulated. FIREPLACE: Improper clearance to combustibles . RESTROOMS : ▪ None present . KITCHEN FACILITIES : • Not acceptable to the Health Department . ADA ACCESS: The building does not meet ADA guidelines . I found that the condition of the majority of the wood framing members were in surprisingly good shape . I feel, however, that should the building be insulated and enclosed without significant measures to weatherproof the structure, rapid decay would be inevitable . The reason that the framing members are in the condition they are in is because of the exposed open construction. The open construction does not contain concealed spaces to trap moisture and allows air to circulate around the members minimizing decay. It is my opinion that very significant and costly renovation would have to be conducted to convert the buildings into a year round facility. I further feel that through the renovation process much of the original building would be lost . 21 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: October 29, 1996 SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE SITES FOR CAMP EDENWOOD DINING HALL The State Historic Preservation Office has made a determination that the existing Camp Edenwood dormitory,dining hall, and an adjacent out building is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Friendship Ventures is proposing construction of a new dining hall in the same location as the existing dining hall. The new building is necessary to meet current State Health Department standards. At its October 1, 1996 meeting, the City Council continued action on the request of Friendship Ventures for construction of a new dining hall in order for the City's Heritage Preservation Commission to review and report on the historic issues. As part of this review, Staff has prepared some alternative site locations for the proposed dining hall. These alternatives are based on preserving the existing dining hall building, and other structures associated to Historic Register eligibility. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the City Council with a technical pro and con comparison of the various options to help in the decision making process. SITE 1 This site shifts the proposed building 60 feet to the northeast. The overall topography at this location is very similar to the current proposal. Benefits: Concerns: • overall building design can be maintained • overall view to lake is reduced • view of the lake is provided • buildings are relatively close • less roadway construction necessary • some additional tree loss • shorter utility lines necessary • additional tree loss is minimal • no variances required • closer proximity to dormitory ,SITE 2 This site location shifts the building the greatest distance from the lake view and on to an area of greater grade change. Benefits: Concerns: • view of the lake is provided • building redesign necessary • less roadway construction necessary • overall view to lake is reduced • shorter utility lines necessary • additional tree loss • no setback variances required • closer access to parking • greater separation of buildings SITE 3 This site location provides views to the lake consistent with the current proposal,but also into some property currently leased from the railroad. Benefits: Concerns: • view of lake is maintained • some building redesign necessary • initial site sought by Friendship Ventures • greatest tree loss • setback variances required • building onto railroad property • longer utility lines necessary • farthest proximity to dormitory Friendship Ventures has indicated that the primary concerns relating to the relocation of the proposed dining hall are as follows: 1. Two of the options will impact the amount of recreational open space that they are trying to maximize. 2. If the existing dining hall is to remain,who will be responsible for the rehabilitation and maintenance required. 3. If the existing dining hall is to remain,what are the safety and liability concerns to Camp Edenwood. 4. A relocation of the proposed dining hall could have an effect on the investment benefit from Friendship Ventures perspective. 5. A relocation of the proposed dining hall will require some level of building redesign, adding to the cost for Friendship Ventures. • G Acf? EDENWoop — AL-r RNATIVE S lire 5 1 , X 7 SNoRE1 ,44o • SE1aKK, I\ EXISTI PATH C v • Ni=Wa' Go' . W K XISTING- n FENCE \ ,-.:,/ .. ,\ `L '," - Cam' GONG. WALK Iii , 40 fol * ... -. . , �� Oks, 0 -1i. BRIDGE \ AKè\\ iI4k ? P \ \ - HALL I .... Pe it ,____:_t_g,0„,2_,..---\\\ *lit . .> ,1/0 , ,\\ , .,„ \ , V W , .N` ♦ ' . / �A yNEW BL S`•- + / `a00' DRIVE t .I y PARKING= A- / -UI 10INGSTO B- -a OVFD ,' WPeil �1 ,'. . .44.° / . r X / EXISTING 1 gOA^ /,,',/ FENCE Y / PERT+( �;'/ "( / 7 le' ) / / / - (/-I / / • /' /' 3c) 'SNoREIAN� v. S41BKK -XISTING PATH \ ,.,.,,. . '' ‘ . \ /i\ . \. `..,. NEW 4' CO , . W K •\ EXISTING- C FENCE X \ ' INt'' i - .1 . 1. oilL mr 6_, ....., \ ' NEW 6' GONG. WALK 41 \ --'r-— \ , 'c�1 IDc� i \'''' ,7 \ \ , , , V , \ i -1 ALA \ \ \ \\\ 1� DI , HA \ VIP \• -4 . \,\ / if / • �� NEW BLS`- + / IIIIII DRIVE t N` ,c PARKING A- ,� / 5UI INCS TO - �� • BE ?`10VED / -I/ LEMED I if) o,'O • / • I PPEK11 ' I . 0 _ / W / / fRIoM / i �' / E)d5TING LILgoAD ,�'' i „I, FENCE _I 06s/ II / -I it$ , , • .. • ,/ // z / ..... , , „ ,,,,, /•,./ , . z ,, ,,, , „7, • • : z ,, , /� I : IE.. i. iiii 2: 2:3,\A .,... (sieoloi/o0,,, :,. C-C412 A V'Ft1t75"-'- .. .77er'''''' ) A. .14 E}ASSWOOD / / /./. E/117SP., /,../ / /...-- //,//// ._xlisTING FDA-D-1 siGN .jf-87BASSWOOD 8''P" / / / / ( / \ \ ( ' N ., / / /,./// 1 \ \ ''''' '''' DEC I. t / / //A/ I 4,N. \ . ' It'l i C17,1i \„.s 0 ''' \` 7.--LU 4' CO \ ese-e //t/2o"OAK.Ap k /,.. .#16‘,.. ARLE gaillY *At 8"MAP 1.4111,1\ ,v" &WV ,40,# 3,0 fe 6 • . iitu,kiotk,ft is I . 'N\4011„ K it----- -,- 'N. N., `,.---1-.7%-_ -:-- N •,----,.--,..,.. ----7 \ Mir"' illeol,. . 1°,,,_ 1*..-0Et4c71.00( N. GHT ... . 0(-e - s\ • E. \V AP:4!. f "" z ±.PL 1:".r W. ' t• L 6aNza47 . '_;"---- ., ' ' \ \\ 10011, ‘"MAP i ".". .,Y • -' / W RE • • 1 il" 2 \. / " Scgt17G \ 9°R lik‘udirisIgUk AtIM ii. • ''W \ /c' \ \ • , ___ M\A\P.,-\•E‘1411111. s\ow. „ Alp Ark 16,-BAssw006----it ; \ y-y. 7, -•oases •"OAK( \/ ,/ 41111r11, s\ -1 8"B\TWO065\ \•\., \\ 1 "\M'APLEN 24 OAK , 0.1* 7"MAPLE . ___-----.\‘.21i'lvi E Wilt _411111. *6"BASSVVOOD / AilWp.-1IIW .....4 SSWOOD\ '., \ \ \ \ ‘. , •ffipap,. ..41460/at 22"MAPLE N ...— _...,:.' 1,2k (r,I-113 i I 14" APL - \ [ 1'11'111'41 44,L.'"" "--)16 fily R pTzive •N -..-4 . / 6"MAt'LE s`Ar -Th , •,,ige - Ilk ry!---,_. 4"MAPLE (2, / ,.,\ Ac ii / i / - t \ . SW,3291:15 /./ - ... ,,' //• i - \ \ \ I \ \ 2 ;t,,, oo6\". 114".MAPLL - --RiSr3,.,15... ,. ' 28"OAK \ \ \ •-. \ \ \\ \ \ \ 19.'0.'7 MOO 1: APLE ,7-;>---•,-- WO ,,O'Ai7 // ,' / //.//.•/' / // / \', \ \ \., V, \',.. '.,'' \\, \ 1 -"MAR. We,....V4916"• APLE • ,t '(,/ Ili / / / ./ / / / ,. \ ' • 1 , ' \ 1 \ wirsilliteec:AK A6"B....§ isiiP; / '-• / / / ./ / i" // / // / / 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 'COON 60P / . b / \ \ / \ \ \ \,,, \',, \\'''., •••••\-\\ \\ \\\, 4"MA •, 0 24/••• ,,PLE +/ A \ \ \ \, . 18‘,.MA'LE , • AK ": '0410/ ,/ \ \ \ \ \ \ ..A. ,) ., , // ippliA' Asswoes„/ / / i / / / / /„/ /// / / / ff i 2270A /22/ AK/ / \ \ \ \\I; \\11 \'\\ \\! \\I \ili. 411.0,A* 4, A• 6, /////// /// 11,N1 / /s4e, :2 Bp-sr /7 7// /77 / * z , 7 , /01 • / // / / //, / / _. . \ \ ) I/ / i i ill 44'XAPLE' /± 4...2"; Ve510D/ / ///' /./ ./ / / , • \ \ i i ,1 ,I 12"PA: WA% / • / , / / / / /1// / / ..v , . , / , „: 1 r / ivoxii-- ,0",,,Aw //,/ / , /, , / , ,• ,• • • i i 1 ' / i//./// ././if///717.13,/A 4.•• ,/ ///// //// // / / /7 * / ,/ ,/ ./ i , „ , „ iv// /s‘ / / / / / // i ,r/ ••I , / ; • • • 32- /, I BASSWOOD \ , BUILDING , • / - ,/ / // PIN // B-1,4IN; / / , , 4 BA-S-SWOOD iral \ 13"SE IP BTIT,* PATH 41Wit A4 ' / / / /' ,/ b • _ 4---. ----. 28 ASSWOOD SIGN -I -,rR .-i37_,.-iii-AT •..,•••iii .„Is,%••:.•••,•• , - , IST.:', .,-; V''' -_ / // ECTR , ' ,, ;ity.,,A4-1::T.-„lit-:.V; .2-;X.;..-•:7 -- L f127. / / ; i/ Ilialii,ES \ - '*,•- •„,'4.•-, •_,f. :. ,V c---.,4 --Ir '_'..:_ , '.,-,7.--..; ,:4,, „,,,1.-.=„,...y, •-•. •:, :54-4..,t-tr .,-. , / ..,,,,.•/1 /2/ \•Ap\ •:- _ , .'€.: 47.44*-Y%-4,1r7-.•.‘?i'..o.t,,..,7,1:- ;,=" . DEC //",/,' .'20"OAK /• / /,/ •\ • NEW 4' • , •, K \ \• ..Air - - On- - , f•/ ,•,/ - ' ---- E .3.,kt, ‘•41\D, % 6 OA .4,.. .1; %)111,\ \\‘\ 1; • 1VillbrA 'Illi! -1 I I 1 I 111000011- 7 I la ft -1 14 , ,. . 1. mit• GHT 1PRORIIir011k . ' ": .P:11111111111111k401 : .410.0e::::: '.,•\\‘\I%\"M•\A\P L,\\W1, 41d1 A P`.IkEw 24"04.\1 .. .,4 7"MAPBLAE SSW001‘ tA'-Il-i e' 4A1W.I FL.11 f1'-0i 11 __.------4-•---1.11--1.1..0-1,.;.0.„1.19„...0._._0-_!-_4•'".-11-4-4111w,w • S \ \ •; Y• , E , \ \ \ ., ‘• . „, Veitiari O"./k, . . , 7,...A, A ilip p/ qougli 11 ,A,z_,, .....,rAtt,ik , - ., ,, \ \ \\\, ,, ',, \ NAMAIllar 1 6 B 4_ :z. 4 •wi, ,...T.,,...- 211.016 ijllph7.-nlli- '-'qgfllbt'T.'• -• GOD ., ,., \ •2 MAPL 611r,Firisp.e, - , , , \ \ , \ / 14" APL 4141111Wa.„.40 4. 1 •ftst ' ,HALL ; _ / - i ', \ \ • \ \ ‘ • . 18"•A -w„lo ,\ \\ \ mA7 LI .00iz-lwAp -----,. tie //' /1",leikr -,, \ •• \ \ \ \ \t..0\ 1 16" Ai:4E "1r c)\ \_...\ • ‘ \ ', : \ • , „Lo . , . ,0, 16„MA-LE, ', ,0• • , • , \ 0 1007.--. - -4 ,..40011,11F ,'' . / / 24-MAPLE AO / i //2/ '' (''/ \ \ \ ' , • --- ,,, / / . / ., / / / 0 \ \ \ ! 20a• oot MS • 101. , ace' — . .. : ",,f,t1-- / ,,, ,/ •,,,. ,, ,/,• !' /7 / / z, ,,19"0A' IS*•-•' -;8"t• — , , /E,5A5.5w,X,,,6s / .,,,,, 4 MAPLE OM, /°1441.11 .„---; / / , , / ///,' .,/,„; `18'BASS. 00'MA - ' `" "I \ "' \ • ' AMP"74. P OA < - • r/er,V // / •'' ' -74KN„...-701 1t8-• AKPLE , t litAde- \ •,. • 'V OAK ,./ " : e' ,, ,//' - // /// , 6"8•• ' •fre Iii / //7" /.-•:///,'/- /1,/ /- .,, './,- ',, /, -, ey .- :ASSy00D8 /./7//// / /.• / ,, , , -J.,47 / ' • / / / / / / ' / '1 '11COT:tIDN OOD \ \ '\ \\,, \ \ ' IV ' 4"MA. ' 24 APLE 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1\47M RL •,-- , 1 \ \ \ , lidia,• 4,-,,3 -4AK Aiii,D,-27/1/2"BA///'49Dy>/"'///////://// /Aj. I 1 \ \ \ \ V7`s ,..,0 ..0 ; HI IH ! 1P1 •,0 „ 11 1 : iii .20- ! , 1 ! • ' 1• ! / / ,, ! ! 1 I 1 ! j ,i ! / .. / ; i _.• ,,/2 4•Ko -/ / ' / //// ' / / / 143.4sSwoe• / / ,/ /'// /' /' A Wd 1 ! , i ii ., 0. 4"• AP: (1) /-4- 44° 15 'A)(/ / / 71/ //// // / //' \ 1 1 I / i: / / / / / i / i/ 0 /'/ /' /// / ///. / / , •////:/ / • ! / / •,* ' . /. / ,, / ,#•• / / /1 ri //' , I/ I. l.:(/I' '' -•*.a ,i z4s/z‘t91/,' '''ssk'" /// / /// 1 / !il1 i, ' //, //•///,,, , / / Q).4),./ „/' / / /, ..05F ' 1 ;/ // '' ---414ASSW 00/S •" / ' (7) ' ' / • /1,./ / ; / , / / // .• 0;0/ / ... ,e, . ,L.'• ” EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-5-96 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. \,/, 6 , DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger EDEN BLUFFS Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: • Adopt an Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment in RM-6.5 Zoning District on 1.53 acres; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 44 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 1.53 acres; Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its October 14, 1996 meeting. The project had been continued at the September 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting so the proponent could hold a neighborhood meeting to address drainage, landscaping, and building quality issues. The neighborhood meeting was held on October 7, 1996, with the plans revised to address neighborhood concerns. The existing Townhome Association has raised concern regarding the quality of construction by the same developer. The original townhomes were constructed with a masonite product that has deteriorated. The proponent met with the Association to discuss the concerns and have offered to help put them in contact with the manufacturer of the building material. The materials to be used for the current project consist of face brick, vinyl siding and trim. The proponent is working with the Eden Bluffs Townhome Association to obtain a shared access agreement for the westerly building. This will be required prior to any building permit issuance. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Planning Commission minutes for September 9, 1996 and October 14, 1996. 4. Staff Reports dated September 6, 1996 and October 11, 1996. 5. Independent inspections reports from existing Townhome Association. 6. September 17,1996 Memo from Gene Abbott of the Inspections Department. I EDEN BLUFFS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF EDEN BLUFFS FOR BATON CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept Amendment of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Eden Bluffs by Baton Corporation and considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on November 5, 1996; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Eden Bluffs, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated October 29, 1996. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated October 14, 1996. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of November, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A Eden Bluffs Legal Description PUD Concept Amendment Eden Bluffs Bluffs East First Addition Bluffs East Second Addition Bluffs East Third Addition PUD District Review,Zoning District Amendment. Site Plan Review.Preliminary Plat Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2, Eden Bluffs 5 EDEN BLUFFS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDEN BLUFFS BY BATON CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Eden Bluffs for Baton Corporation dated October 29, 1996, consisting of 1.53 acres into 6 townhome units, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of November, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk q Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 B. EDEN BLUFFS by Baton Corporation. Request for PUD Concept Amendment on 44 acres,PUD District Review on 1.53 acres,Zoning District Amendment in the RM- 6.5 District on 1.53 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres, and Preliminary Plat for 1.53 acres. Location: Sherman Drive at County Road 1. Randy Zejdlik, developer,reviewed his development proposal with the Commission. They downsized their original plan, which was approved for 10 units, down to six units. The style of the units changed from two story tuck-under townhome to one level and walkout townhome. Each unit provides about 1,284 square feet on one level with the prices starting at around $132,000. Depending on location and amenities, the price can jump up to $170,000. There is a model in Inver Grove Heights and the colors used were beige with gray roof and white trim. They may change this project to a darker color like taupe but in the same color range as recommended in the Staff Report. Kipp reviewed the Staff Report with the Commission. Access to the westerly units will be a shared access with the existing townhome to the north. The design is more of a transitional design from a two story townhome to the residential single family design to the south. The units are walkouts on the west side and ramblers on the east side of Sherman Drive. The density of the project is approximately 3.9 units per acre, well under the maximum of 6.7 units per acre provided by City Code. One revision needs to take place prior to the City Council's review regarding the total caliper inches of landscaping. Staff recommended increasing the caliper inches based on the square footage of the building. An additional fire hydrant needs to be located. Staff recommended that the architecture be revised to include specific shingle color and trim color to blend with the townhomes to the north. Staff recommends approval with those recommendations included. Ismail was concerned about the shared access of the westerly building with the townhomes to the north of the property. Kipp explained the shared access and how it came about. The Public Hearing was opened. Victor Daurte, 9983 Old Wagon Trail, commented that the plan is incomplete. It does not include Old Wagon Trail or where the land adjoins the proposed land for development. He asked if this parcel of land was part of the previous parcel that was developed. Kipp replied that the west parcel was approved for a 6 unit building back in 1983. 6 S Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 Daurte expressed concern that when he bought his property he was told that property was not a big enough lot for the same type of structure because there wasn't enough room. His land joins this property and he would never have bought it if he knew that. Kipp replied that he has no control over what the developer's or realitors for the neighboring development told their buyers. When Staff meets with developers they sit and discuss the surrounding land use and approval. Duarte was concerned about a low priced unit developed next to a high priced unit devaluating the higher priced unit. He moved to Eden Prairie because of the open space and was concerned about buffers to divide these properties. He was also concerned about the storm water drainage and the color. He suggested a berm and trees to be used for a buffer. Kipp indicated there will not be any berm constructed along the west side but there is going to be a number of additional caliper inches of landscaping on the property. There is quite a landscaping buffer currently planted along that boundary of Old Wagon Trail. Regarding open space, there is a small wetland at the southwest corner of the property and existing trees. The storm sewer is along Sherman Drive. Sandstad explained that they use buffers, fencing,berms or significant distance when they have different land uses next to each other. He does not perceive a need to buffer townhomes from townhomes. Jerry Marx, 9961 Old Wagon Trail, agreed with the comments made by his neighbor. He was concerned about there not being a buffer because his house is lower than this development and when cars come the headlights shine in his home. It can also become a dangerous situation if the cars ever slipped over the curb. He was also concerned about a drainage problem on his property that doesn't drain. Don Longshore, 9985 Old Wagon Trail, commented he has concerns about the transition from the new development to their development. He feels strongly that some kind of buffer would be highly desirable. His home, Mr. Duarte's home and Mr. Marx's home are all to the west of the new development which will have a great impact on them. Richard Schultak, 422 West County Road D, New Brighton, noted he works for Wooddale Realty which is a subsidarary of Wooddale Builders and shares the same concerns as the previous speakers. The new project is up six to eight feet higher than Old Wagon Trail and it creates a problem with the car lights shining in. He urged the Commission to consider a buffer and was also concerned about the drainage. 7 (P Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 Joann Hazuka, 10647 Sherman Drive, noted she lives in the Eden Bluffs complex and expressed concern about the developer because they have learned he cuts corners. Eden Bluffs is a 13 year old property and they are being hit hard with assessments for items that have deteriorated well before their life expectancy. They have put on a new roof in the last year and siding will have to be done next year. She handed out copies of a document from an insurance company who hired an inspector to take a look at the roofs. The document was dated April 4, 1994 and indicated the wind damage to the shingles is the result of improper and inappropriate securement at the time of their initial installation. The shingles continue to be very vulnerable to wind damage and additional, partial, or complete dislodging can be expected during periods of even moderate winds. Isolated repairs to the current damaged areas cannot be expected to minimize the potential for additional wind damage or to minimize the potential for leakage from the other deficiencies noted above. The inspector's conclusion was the shingles were improperly secured when installed. The flashing sleeve fasteners were exposed and unsealed. The flanges were typically unsealed. There are leakage and condensation risks that exist. They were assessed over $1,200 last year for the roofing and they are looking at about $5,000 per unit for siding. She was also concerned about the access driveway because Baton Corporation never mentioned it to them. After speaking with neighbors along the south side there was a concern about flooding as a result of this development. It's too late for them to seek legal compensation for substandard work. Her concern is for the future neighbors and quality structures in the neighborhood and their values. Jim Miller, 10000 Kearny Lane, expressed concern about the kind of grading between the new building and his lot. It's a runoff ravine at a low level. He has watched his neighbor float around in there with a canoe. He was also concerned about the drainage. He expressed concern about single family homes adjacent to townhomes. He has a lot of privacy and was concerned about the distance of this new project to his home and the impact on the value his home. Kipp indicated the existing wetland elevation is approximately 832 and Mr. Miller's home is probably about the 838 range. The proposed townhouse is at 860. It's a higher elevation on the north side of that pond and it would be a walkout design. Miller asked if there is going to be a ravine or draining between his property and the new one. Kipp replied the Engineering Department is looking at the draining issues. Ron Szmergalski, 10648 Jackson Drive, noted he was the man with the kids and the canoe and showed where he lives on the map. He expressed concern about the 8 3 Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 grading and the height. He was concerned about having additional water runoff on his property as a result of raising the level of land to build these townhomes. He noted that his garden is at the bottom of his site and it's three foot tall in the back. He had to raise it two years ago because it kept getting flooded out in the Spring. He was also concerned about the number of trees and how the site would be developed because there is a significant number of large trees and tall in height directly between his house and the existing townhouses. He questioned what the lot line distance is from the two projects. Kipp indicated it's approximately 150 to 200 feet. Eric Isom, 10876 Dashmond Drive, was concerned that the developer's plans did not give a full flavor of the project, that it was incomplete. He strongly feels the background of the developer should be checked out. He expressed concern about the grading in the rear of the property where the units are shown because there is a very steep slope down into the wetland area. He was also concerned about the additional runoff from the roofs going into the backyards and the erosion that will occur on the steep slope. He questioned the impact they're going to have on the wetland. He wanted to know what the fate was of the existing trees in the area behind the townhomes because they serve as an excellent transition from the higher density townhomes to the single family homes. Removal of those trees will significantly deteriorate that area for both the townhomes and the single family homes. He was also concerned about the distance between the single family homes and the two unit townhouse complex because it's only about 30 to 40 feet range. He asked how in depth of a look did the Engineering Department review the drainage issue. Kipp indicated the Planning Staff, Engineering Staff, and Park Staff review these plans. They will continue to review the drainage and will make sure it works properly prior to building permits. Isom was concerned that the drainage issue is not beingreviewed in depth because g p he spoke to a Randy Slick in the Engineering Department and he was not aware of this project. He would like to see the 100 year flood level in effect as part of the drainage review. He asked that the trees remain in the area. It's time for corporations to make a commitment in some way saying they will leave those trees there so the property values don't decrease and they do have a transition zone. Lynn Gonzo, 10647 Sherwood Drive, expressed concern about the drainage problems because you can not see the seriousness of the problem by looking at a map. She has very strong concerns about the developer and there has been no communication with him. The proposed units are an extension of their own units and yet they have had no communication from the developer. The driveway issue has not yet been addressed which is a concern of hers. She was concerned about whether the new homeowners 9 Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 will be told their neighbors had to deal with assessments due to premature rotting of the property, and will they have to ensue those assessments or be exempt from it. She commented that there would have been more residents present but they were told through the City that this project is a done deal and felt attending the Planning Commission was a waste of their time. Ismail was very uncomfortable about the statement that the project is a done deal because he takes his job very seriously. He asked for the name of the City employee who stated this. Gonzo said she was told this by someone else which makes her a third party so she was hesitant in giving a name. Isom stated he got the same impression that it was a done deal. Kathryn Mullis, 10770 Jackson Drive, commented when she received notice of the meeting she made phone calls and her neighbors to the right and left made phone calls. They were told that the project had been approved and the meeting is for sort of making decisions on some planning aspects. Clinton stated this is not a rubber stamp commission. They do change projects based on their merit for development. They have to deal with the laws of this City and projects are approved according to the law. Most of the commissioners do get a chance to look at the sites in question. They don't have all the facts and that's the reason for the public hearing to get input from the residents. If the information they get changes the picture, they will not approve a project. Kipp indicated he has been working for the City for 13 years and he has never said to anyone that any project is a done deal. This project was originally reviewed in 1983, approved for 10 units on these two lots. He indicated to residents that this proposal is an amendment to that project and the purpose of this meeting is to submit the project before the Commission for change of plans from the original PUD, and that public comment is also taken in at that meeting. A person he spoke to used the phrase, "it's a done deal". Kipp said no, that they are amending the approved proposal. Szmergalski questioned why nothing has been done since this was approved 13 years ago. Clinton commented he can think of three projects that have been approved but no ground breaking has taken place. Zejdlik commented that the project was not a good project economically and that's why they decided not to go forward. Miller asked who they should talk to about the economic impacts of this project. 10 9 Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 Sandstad directed him to the City Council. Kipp indicated that he will make sure the Building Department takes a close look at any complaints received from the original construction. Foote commented he does not believe this project will lower the value of the single family homes. However, this project has a lot of problems and he was not comfortable supporting it. He was concerned about the drainage and no transition from the two unit building to the single family home on the southeast. He was very concerned that there was no neighborhood meetings. There must be a neighborhood meeting with discussion of the project. Ismail concurred with Foote's statements. He asked Staff to have the building inspector look at the history of the developer and would like a copy of his report for the Commission. He would not support the project until all the issues are addressed. Habicht commented the change from 10 units to six units is a step in the right direction. The project should be continued to the next meeting for a greater detail on landscaping and drainage plan. He's not convinced the project requires buffers but it requires more detail. Sandstad stated the plan needs work. He was concerned about the lack of a public meeting with the adjacent owners who will share the driveway. Wissner said she was not comfortable with the plan at all. She would like to see more detail on the specifics and stressed the quality control issue about the project. These people suffered very bad and she wants to make sure it doesn't happen again. Clinton commented the developer should come back with at least having a neighborhood meeting. There should be more details to the plan that would describe landscaping,transition of the various properties, drainage plan and an overall grading plan in general. He also asked that the Building Department or Engineering Department give them a better comfort over the quality of the building and that data should be included in their packets. Zejdhk stated that the grading problem seems to come from the Wooddale people. He noted his site is a lot higher and has already been approved for 10 units so it's not their problem Wooddale didn't know that. He said that people have been taking stabs at them and making accusations. They have a Parade twinhome and everyone is welcome to go visit it in Inver Grove Heights to see their quality of work. He commented that the problems people were having has to do with masonite. They did 11 /v Planning Commission Monday, September 9, 1996 not install the shingles but hired contractors to do that. He would like an engineer to look at that to see if it's probably the quality of the shingle itself. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, Foote seconded, to continue the Public Hearing for 30 days to the October 14, 1996 meeting. Motion carried 6-0. 12 �' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, October 14, 1996 Page 2 B. EDEN BLUFFS by Baton Corporation. Request for PUD Amendment on 44 acres, PUD District Review on 1.53 acres,Zoning District Amendment in RM-6.5 District on 1.53 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres, and Preliminary Plat for 1.53 acres. Location: Sherman Drive at County Road 1. Kipp commented the proponent met with the Eden Bluffs Association and held a neighborhood meeting to address the concerns raised by the neighborhood residents at the Planning Commission meeting of September 9, 1996. In addition, the plans were revised based on the Staff Report and neighborhood input. Jan Zedlik, Baton Corporation, stated they met with the Eden Bluffs Homeowners Association and answered questions. They held a neighborhood meeting and had been asked to put boulders at the end of one of the driveways. They met with their landscape architect and had endeavored to incorporate this feature into their plans. City Engineer Al Gray met with them to address the drainage concerns. She noted they were submitting their original proposal with additions requested by the neighborhood residents. Kipp reviewed the staff report and the landscape plan has been revised per the stipulations in the staff report. They are in the process of obtaining a cross access easement and this needs to be finalized prior to building permit issuance. These plans will be required to conform to the 1992 Uniform Building Code. Sandstad inquired if staff had looked at the existing townhomes or just reviewed the records. Kipp responded that they looked at their records and the inspection reports but had not inspected the buildings themselves. Sandstad inquired if staff had drawn any conclusions regarding what might be the cause of the deterioration, and if not, requested that staff look into this issue. The Public Hearing was opened. Jerry Marx, 10961 Old Wagon Trail, stated he flew over the area and took pictures of the site. He felt that the buffering should be increased as it was presently inadequate. He passed pictures he had taken from the air around to the Planning Commissioners. Richard Schultek, 422 West County Road D,New Brighton, stated he worked for Wooddale Realty, and was selling townhomes that were located to the west of the subject property. He believed the landscaping plans should be available for residents to view. Zedlik responded that the renderings they have, do not reflect the addition of the boulders, but she illustrated where they would be located on the site plan. Erik Isum, 10676 Jackson Drive, inquired about the manhole and when it was installed. Gray responded that the old pipe going into the manhole was blocked off and there were only two pipes going out which is what should be there. There will be limited drainage into the wetland. /a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, October 14, 1996 Page 3 Foote inquired why the evergreens along the border were of different heights and Kipp responded that it was done this way to present a more natural effect. Foote inquired how close to the property line unit 2 was and Kipp responded that a 10 foot setback was allowed in this zoning district. The garage was located about 18 feet from the property line and there was a 10 foot grading and drainage easement in this area also. The location of the existing house is 10 feet from the property line so there will be 20 feet between them. Sandstad stated he believed sufficient improvements had been made to the plans so that he could move the project forward. Ismail stated he was disappointed in the memo from the Building Inspector as it did not really address their questions. He concurred that the project should be moved forward. Wissner stated she wished to be sure no one representing the Townhome Homeowners Association was present, and no one spoke up. She believed the project was acceptable with the additional landscaping and stated she would support it. Foote stated he would like to see more room between the townhomes and single family but the proposed plan was a compromise and he supported the project. Clinton commented most of the issues had been resolved and he was supportive of the present plan as proposed. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote,to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend approval of Eden Bluffs by Baton Corporation for PUD Amendment on 44 acres,PUD District Review on 1.53 acres,Zoning District Amendment in RM-6.5 District on 1.53 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres, and Preliminary Plat for 1.53 acres based on plans dated September 19, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 11, 1996. Motion carried 5-0. IS STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: October 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Eden Bluffs APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Baton Corporation LOCATION: Sherman Drive at County Road No. 1 REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 44 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.53 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment on 1.53 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat on 1.53 acres. 1 'll N. I._ - --- - - --- - - -- .1 Zigilarli -------7:77-1.--. - -°V-D1- 71.1 - f Iiir• UR i,F ■ 4*S°F :.'42. — rcr. ./al•p Oill /81. lifi<- 1010114W it ii: 41 w.11.11Y ,-, ROAD `.a �. P.;"' t OE 4... A i �♦/i '-• ili V+44tibi, Will m . C OWL' SUt14 . eIrt. ivy 4. 10 .41' (...i..,i .. mar 4 arm '' ...I VW ,.' O f illP ., , ga# .` O , .1, - Ai LY�p1 . IR. v `% ` .' ii,47°)k) deill LORD OUR' 4•. !L1 NI ,.. .:_.-.4 44R .DRi V CO. RD. � I ' a �''•::. rAVVIII ! q ROAD in 4/00 , x � 4% , ,I, ifi " ,:r r,,,,,:. . WM , `Egli hil�j ip C %:itfDGE DR. Ii ; .. • v � "(' c�I mi INIMM nisi///II'i!j* .n;-• 7-1-5 grei -- + iivo ni BALSA;k1 • ' m m P4 Ri T •..ti; l .. 7 ' ;• 7i. .!ill. 71i I ;\.:17,4';•'... - - ' --. • A ill 0pr Ell ea At-- LAN£ '�.:���� T-f , I I I•� � • • ._ • \4 " •DR• jL w.STr?A JI :x5o11111"11111 itts- • �`h4:S,IL'S �Et _immitesr ._ := is .� A \- 5-`441MIffitt ' 2I ' .L GRAN Ohl R� - -- cr li• 1. Q111111 VIIINNP' lik'Nidilik iI 01. @6„s � tii �, 4r LEE l*frP, 11%, .1: 1 A. ..-1° .,••II wl, ♦�� pgR.S`h 0 24 ib Rill , wiipir 41t ° -1.G Nif . ar2 :-;‘ 44:14 .° 41. F S irAe ....4). 3 1 ilu CRE legg NMI co i 41LLS 3=q coct- . A , ........, M"� 1 • lla DRY i i 'I' 4 -... • :? `v • :. /� 41 ROAD. i �tr z < /tits z 11111 > 10 ��. J ate:.° - Staff Report Eden Bluffs October 11, 1996 BACKGROUND This project was continued at the September 9, 1996 Planning Commission meeting in order for the proponent to address issues raised by the Commission and neighborhood regarding overall site drainage, landscaping, and past building construction concerns. Since that meeting,the following actions have taken place: 1. Baton Corporation met with the Eden Bluffs Townhomes Association to address the proposal and existing townhome concerns. 2. Baton Corporation held a neighborhood meeting at the City Center to address revised plans based on concerns identified at the Planning Commission. The Senior Planner and City Engineer were also present to answer questions. 3. The Inspections Department reviewed its files regarding the construction of the original Eden Bluff Townhomes development. A memo is provided with this Staff Report. 4. The proponent has submitted revised plans for Planning Commission review. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The plans have been revised to show off-site topography, existing storm sewer systems, and neighboring home elevations. The overall drainage to the existing wetland in the southeast corner of the property is minimal since the completion of a storm water pond within the westerly neighboring development in 1995. The majority of the surrounding drainage is directed to this off-site pond. Only a minimal increase in impervious surface is proposed with the current project. LANDSCAPING Additional trees have been added to the proposal in response to the Staff Report and neighboring concerns. The Code requires a total of 58 caliper inches of plant material. The revised plan provides 70 caliper inches. Conifer trees ranging between 6' and 10'tall have been added along the easterly and westerly boundaries of the site to provide buffering to the adjoining land uses. Conifers and landscape boulders have been provided at the end of the dive aisle for the westerly building, in response to a neighboring concern. 2 JL0 Staff Report Eden Bluffs October 11, 1996 The revised plans also show the location of the existing tree line near the existing wetland. In order to provide greater protection for this wetland and tree line, a Conservation Easement is proposed. SHARED ACCESS The westerly building will share a private drive with the existing townhome Association to the north. The access has not changed from the original 1983 approval, and was constructed during the original site development. The proponent is working with the existing Association to establish the shared use and maintenance agreement, which will need to be finalized prior to any building permit issuance. EXISTING BUILDINGS AND PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE Included in this Staff Report is a memo from the Inspections department addressing its review of the building file for the existing townhomes to the north. The Commission requested this review based on building code compliance and quality of construction concerns raised by the owners of the townhomes. The proponent has revised the architectural plans to specifically identify the types and colors of building materials to be used for the new units, including the use of white trim and garage doors for continuity with the existing townhomes, as recommended in the Staff Report. Face brick, vinyl siding are the primary materials to be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Amendment 44 acres, PUD District Review on 1.53 acres,Zoning District Amendment on 1.53 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 1.53 acres based on plans revised and dated October 11, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Reports dated September 6, 1996, and October 11, 1996, including the following: 1. Prior to the final plat approval,the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed district. 3 Staff Report Eden Bluffs October 11, 1996 2. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review B. Submit landscaping surety equivalent to 150 % of the cost of the landscaping improvements indicated on the approved plan. C. Submit plans to the Fire Marshall for his approval. D. Submit a cross-access and maintenance agreement for the common driveway. E. Provide a cash contribution to the Storm Water Utility in lieu N.U.R.P. pond construction. F. Submit a recorded conservation easement document for the protection of the existing wetland and trees located in the southeast corner of the property. 3. The following waivers from city code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District Review in RM 6.5 Zoning Districts: A. Waiver from minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet to 2,940 square feet for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, and 3,430 square feet for Lots 1 and 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2. 4 /1 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Krista R. Flemming,Planning Intern THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: September 6, 1996 SUBJECT: Eden Bluffs APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Baton Corporation LOCATION: Sherman Drive at County Road No. 1 REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 44 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.53 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment on 1.53 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat on 1.53 acres. '9 1114r# AWE Mil fl . �pQ S°F r W•Y I 11,tWAh # m,e1 •. r!:� = NI is -- dlinik #f/ ' ROAD Rif -. ' :,-.... 0* , egg", It, 4.• 4111.0- `. 0120,4 plc 1 . � z , LA N' •1- � aP W a R OUdR. :...] 444& T. Ihill I,-.-" A , R i DRiV_ CO. RD. I J '' . ilk i ,- �''•albr ail i .r �,i�611 B ROAD '� ,Q/ a - X s ihit . :: t• ,, OG i .� . BUCXINGNAkI� •R .. r .......... NW' 0 sislOtamossatta --c ARM g1OGE OR. ,` -A,,-i_� • BL. , OSSa� _ c,. 'BALSAM piR .� IMIalkt1.1•7•7 "' j Z 11116 A W t---\ . wir44.; m m I F 4 JUNIPER 2 Qvdi r • Tli I ••:' iihr„ 4.- P liliI LANE •�et,3• T'f ( I• •OR. � ,� . ,ierXSa .-1• 574 iite Ail 7•\�,. JI t .L I � 1 GRAM:1-1 I �. �■ '`� I• wi'e,e.\Agial w , I TT ��1 ��,r, il* 4,/ LEb� DRIVE �, .�l,�e® , TRA l 44,, _ 1 ifiS" h%1:1?"' p_,50L`ND-4410 -wir mit# li® M 4 O . ®7 J itt cc sisr.F., /,Dt, CC (311111,1 q y ? M5� lb r- c- �tL_5 ,� �' T ' 7 I I x.cct '7°‘7 A -.. .z _..1 •,-71 - i ' ' �Q, 3cc ' �tr • 1 ;t 4.1 , Staff Report Eden Bluffs September 6, 1996 BACKGROUND The site is part of the 1983 Bluffs East Planned Unit Development consisting of 90 single family homes and 40 town homes. The subject property is located within the town home portion of the PUD and is presently a vacant land area. This site is currently guided and zoned for Multiple- Family Residential. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REVIEW/SITE PLAN The proposal is to construct 6 town home units on the 1.53 acre site, consisting of one duplex and one four-plex building. There are four units at 3430 sq. ft. each and two units at 2940 sq. ft. each. The PUD approved plan was for a total of 10 units on the site consisting of one four-plex building and one six-plex building. Density of the project is 3.92 units per acre. City Code would permit up to 6.7 units per acre in the RM-6.5 District. These lots are less than 6,500 sq. ft. required by code as were the ones previously approved through the PUD,therefore waivers from the city code will be required. Since the platting of the lots in this manner is typical for a property Association where open space is in shared ownership, and the overall land area per unit exceeds 13,000 sq. ft., these waivers have merit and have been approved by the City for other town home projects. The base area ratio is 17% and the floor area ratio is 28%. Code allows up to a 20%BAR and 40% FAR in the RM-6.5 District. Both of the buildings meet the required setbacks. The site plan includes the required total of 12 parking spaces. Access to the westerly building will be shared with the town homes to the north of the subject property. A cross access and maintenance agreement will be required for this shared driveway. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The grading of the property will not impact the existing wetland or vegetation located in the southwest corner of the property. The Engineering Department has determined that the small amount of additional runoff created by this project does not warrant construction of a N.U.R.P. pond. However, a cash contribution to the Storm Water Utility is requested in lieu of the pond based on $1000.00 per acre of impervious surface plus 2% of the land value. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available from Sherman Drive. It is necessary to locate an additional fire hydrant near the four-plex building on either side of the driveway. 2I • Staff Report Eden Bluffs September 6, 1996 ARCHITECTURE The approved Planned Unit Development architecture was for the use of similar colors and building materials. The architecture of this development is quite similar to the adjacent town homes. The duplex is 6860 sq. ft. and the four-plex is 12,740 sq. ft. The design is a walkout or rambler with garages in the front. The proposed development provides a transition from the existing multiple family to single family units. The staff recommends that the building color scheme include black shingles, white trim and garage doors, and brown face brick to coordinate surrounding buildings for this transition. LANDSCAPING Based on City Code, a total of 58 caliper inches of plant material is required. The landscaping plan depicts a total of 25 caliper inches. Prior to City Council Review,the plan will need to be revised, including the size spread requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Amendment 44 acres,PUD District Review on 1.53 acres, Zoning District Amendment on 1.53 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.53 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 1.53 acres based on plans dated August 19, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated September 6, 1996,which are as follows: 1. Prior to the City Council Review,the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscape plan depicting a total of 58 caliper inches of plant material, including size spread requirements. B. Locate an additional fire hydrant on the west lot on either side of the driveway. C. Revise the architecture to include black roof shingles, white trim and garage door, and brown face brick for transitional purposes. 2. Prior to the final plat approval,the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed district. 22 Staff Report Eden Bluffs September 6, 1996 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review B. Submit landscaping surety equivalent to 150 %of the cost of the landscaping improvements indicated on the approved plan. C. Submit plans to the Fire Marshall for his approval. 4. Submit a cross-access and maintenance agreement for the common driveway. 5. Provide a cash contribution to the Storm Water Utility in lieu N.U.R.P. pond construction. 6. The following waivers from city code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District Review in RM 6.5 Zoning Districts: A. Waiver from minimum lot size of 6500 square feet to 2940 square feet for lots 2 and 3, block 1, and 3430 square feet for lots 1 and 4,block 1; lots 2 and 3, block 2. 23 • FROM : MULTIVENTURE PROPERTIES INC. P1-GE NO. : 612 927 6164 Sep. 08 1996 06:49PM P2 .. 'APRroB-s4' tPale`S ter- • ` . ..��. •� it) •. • It?• ,'J'.i01 DM�d antra%Mrster.a...Ab4 33422 - 11.4 t 14.s3.4•r ►r..41:•4.4.0sas •:: fff W«tetwr.ewasr.f,.tsr.2q *uw..r-. wt tile• Pe.414.4444 Yax 4167144141 •Noll<ISPE , i �t1�rAee.,t,�t+ra(..vMle r ris......ft J••r•Mr....r+.ri......w Ae/etude.r gem . • • • >? 1.1144ra!! Eden Illufh•Hosneowaors Association. Z1ATSt April 4, 1994 •'f Sherman Drive. Eden Prairie. ACV wry w vn 0,4no41411. •�. gas Mn/ae.PIM) OI r1.AMet �wr_•.� West 78th Street. Suite 220 � h '�"0" rr�= Elden Prairie.MN 5S344 t 7 fir` t Lr._ . :Atter Orcg Revering �./�iL4«.�w S es , 1'4 443i-1_ _. {r. ... SAX Se 'Roam. 'AL•uM a.U.. 3— • On aid, 3t1,r1994,we conducted an evaluation of the shingled roots on tho above project. The purpose •of dvalitutoa was to determine the nature and extent of any wind damage. the must at the damage. and:nialta reoranmendatiens for appropriate remedial action. of the roof areas was visually • Wmiaed and photOgraphs wens taken, some Pf which have been included as a part of this report. The `:.4cttehdd-roof tketeh was provided for reference. •.BsLit9 d inforaiatiott was provided by represesttetives of Wright Bros. Rod:ding. Based on the back- ':ground inhorsmation and'out observations,wind damage to the shingles has occurred on at least four previous ooesslaus. We are not aware of any leakage as a result of the wind damage of the shingles. • • • 194SLRVATIIIMN$ • '1liY+ao-tsb•.asphalt text shingles at. present throughout all of these sloped roof areas. Roof penattatlotta latitde.ohlmnsys:and plumbing vents with Integral flashing &ltxv..s (photos #1.4). :Wind:dau�pge to•the shingles, reediting•in cracking of the shingle tabs autd/or partial.or complete,shingle: .:l e.has occurred,on each of the seven tawnhomo butdinga (photos #2-7). Observation of the shingles :l lttailatlan. as both damaged and ur4atnagsd areas. revealed the shingles were improperly secured .•initially...The:+Maples used for securemcnt were Improperly positioned. installed at various angles. and were under alto Cverdi'fven (photos #8.10). Where the staples wars unclerdriven. In many instance..they • pisveatetd'tlic shingle tabs from sealing co the underlying shingles. Some oracking of the shingles has also •• . ge utrrd(photo *11). • Matt'at the QaMhinit sleeves for the roof penetrations were secured. in part;with fasteners which wars left exposed and unsealed (pbeto 012). 'rho flanges themselves were also typically unsealed.which provides . an avenue for potential water entry. It was noted that there are no ridge vents and the valley and wall itasltin&were unsealed to the un4crtsyaaent or shingles. There is. therefore, an Increased potential for leakage as these locations and. due to the absence of ridge vents, for eond.nswsioa in the attic spaces. • 4.• • Al a w%* l/.ens.•••tisae...,dee e.+s*etel eV.e.We..eft.rtrer_are sHanttllee as n.eenoehtezt.t*rowdy to sere*anti.. .when. aue...iarr.w 4 rtr...ry w...town•*y...tsm.nse.,uone..sw et*twee=arm s r.y.rarp tar r.pw+a. • r▪3r. • •%. ram. .•j • . f • .reel . AM 0 144l0 ProteeIon to donna.ova Ktrle and Ot.Ysal.+e.all tveena et.eetteee.I el W..ee ee.teet eroo..b.. U.M.e red w.w.,rt toenrteerew r..swewy to MADAM any atawttsnnt.eertCSvsrons.r..►awe Woo of rrgrntoll•w nv014. • . •• ............� Vet /IYM.......�� ..... -�. ..• SEP 8 '96 18:47 612 927 6164 PAGE.002 2g Sep. 203 1996 06:50pm P3 NO : 927 6164 ' FRal : tti-T I. .UEtf.11-I. PROPERTIES INC. P....Tf,I .5: 612., ,.... ".......„_ ..J..... i'mrAmOW M4 StirntPli-08.694 .WED 0849 ItiSPEC INC. FM NO. 5488889 P.0248' .,,,,,-•..: . -.1.14••-• . . . INC..........., .,--.......: ::,:,.:... •,... ,/:::,.. .,..:..,... .. .p...•.•. .43.::: :-',......,,....da,.....,..... . . :.... W14940351,434 *iiiiI5:4;1994 ff • . . ,_. .: .:-... ... • Pte:P.FAPY4Y19%. .. ‘44.V1.-ti41 .'•::".•''.*:::••st.:• ." • .......y!. .-::•%:0'::--,: P.,:v.ii...., ...A!!..1,-,,, ;.: .. ....''f.'ilisiC10141CralgIONS --A:•::::;:;.,.... .... ....., . g.i:';',...:;;;•e-i,...,;;.;...;.4:1'..*::.;',......f. .... • . ......':-. A.4*1.*•*2.7,1•01)441rvations, the wind damage to the shingles l the result of improper and inappropriate ..4.;41!,004:0iPalteitt..the time of their initial installation. The shingles continua to ba very vulnerable to wind . .. :44040:4dditional partial, or complete, dislodging can be expected during periods of even moderate .:....: :.04440......4illituil•ropttirs to the current damaged areas eanncs be expected to minimiza the potential for • '. ...*.•.Tidditginalwitui darnage or to minimize the potential for leakage from the other deBelencies noted above. 00011Z2MJSEI . , . . It;.,,,.,.....,,,:„.... .c.,... . . ..xii, .. ....7The.;fietti notes and other miscellaneous intonnation will be retained in OUT Mc& Should you have any ::: :::'::fictieftlooartigarding this report, please feel free to contact our office. vh..-4-,,,ii..oi•!:.-i ..?:-.-: -.....•• N-4-i-t .. .:.... • ... .: . #64ity•.•:. •i.-• ,' a- eg./.24412=1. -. • --••••••'::,' -.,•:v:r.'. - 0•Betker • • ).-4-1• . (....1,;.•;;A.:44: -- • • • r 4.'1:`61344r• • ' ..-i;-.: ' • ,r0'''• • • r. • oft-..• • .1.•••••:... . :.i.y.z ... ... ...,;:fy..e.:,. • .r:::'•ei•!••.',; gil„;•...... • . . • •• . . ..•*". • , • .., •;',.tig..,'; • ...1.....• • .". .,,-.. . • tr..: ' •-•.. . '4'*:* :. •• . 4,1-•• ..A. . 1-• ..!... •• • •••,( 4. . :iir• .:,.. .. 411.• • . • :',..0...• • ..• .. . • _ Ai a*Mg"Maga,*deft.he ixtee And adstivss.di moms sot suIrsises as 1%.aiwilder441 prow*ei amnia aftt ay woo" e"ibiblarigen 4 Pqmosiomy a publish sny erametteilL ortsturbwts to swum tram sr nsiarsisva OW rs00‘11. • SEP 8 '96 18:48 6/2 927 6164 PAGE.003 25 FROM : MULTIVENTURE PROPERTIES INC. PHONE NO. : 612 927 6164 Sep. 08 1996 06:50PM P4 . . 17 1% p.. J•. WL.L 44J•YJJ ja.?•.rW,iwit• S.a. L(....S 1 .V.L. 1.6I.1J&C T.L fU.J.i ,ri7 •• f•• .•. `_-- • yam,•' 1111:51 III: • r • Ii , . -41 III; 1 N .......-- .,. . pie- z • . ...,.. . . .... .. . ....11 411. a i'•t `;:` :.,•• '• i, ry �y j?' '`!Mid@.• 2! --;s .14_40 ..e...i-. �:Cis -• • t' t ; ...: • -. ...• : .... .. . II., .t . ti 4.4... -- 4 • •< 1.. .f..' . 4 " ' "'I• ' . 11:4g4 lit ''...'I- 0 tek. ‘ ' Cr III .1 . 44410..e.,.i1,. . . . 1,4.14.. F,,,,.‘... ,,_: . Ati...t.t. • •• :1.411144. . • „. . • .". .. . ..1 . _it .../.. . AT • •`•� ;,.;• • r . !e SEP 8 '96 18:49 612 927 6164 PAGE.004 26 FROM : MULTIVENTURE PROPERTIES INC. PHONE NO. : 612 927 6164 Sep. 08 1996 06:51PM PS 0 AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY AUTO-OWNERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY auto-Owners HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Life Home Car Business PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY 7Ii6AbR0da+rt ® PO DOX 54356 • XT. PAUL, UN 551N • (612) 777-0117 April 9, 1994 Eden Bluffs Homeowners Assoc. 10693 Sherman Dr. Eden Priarie, MN 55344 ATTENTION: Jeff Patterson RE: Our Insured : Eden Bluffs Homeowners Assoc. Our Claim No 18-2273-94 Date of Loss 3-7-94 Dear Mr. Jeff Patterson: Enclosed is a copy of the roof evaluation report from Inspec, Inc. You will note that the inspector concludes multiple problems exist with regard to the original installation of the roofing. Auto Owners agrees to patch the roof areas that were damaged in the windstorm of 3-7-94. A single deductible of $500.00 is applicable on behalf of the Association. Please forward a repair statement from Wright Brothers Roofers at your earliest convenience so that we can issue payment. • Please also provide the name address and phone number of the contractor who built the Eden Bluffs Complex. We believe we have a right of subrogation against the roofer who improperly installed the roof. If you have any questions in this regard, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Rva. 1 AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY • Nancy Haertel, Adjuster Extension 267 • NH:mh . : cc:file Enclosure: Inspec, Inc. report • SEP 8 '96 18:49 612 927 6164 PA(E.005 2'7 FROM : M.lt_T I VENTURE PROPERTIES INC. PI-ME NO. : 612 927 6164 Sep. 08 1996 06:51PM P6 t-.._ Auto-Owners Insurance Company Agency Ray Smith Insurance Agency, Inc. Home-Owners Insurance Company Owners Insurance Company _ Property-Owners Insurance Company No.06701 Date 4-20-94 Date of Survey Policy # 93-242-583-00 Please complete&return by 5-20-94 Insured's Name Eden Bluffs Eomeowners Association, Inc. Attn: Sue Mullana 10697 Sherman Dr Address Eden Prairie MN 55347-4449 Dear Policyholder, A survey of.your property, insured under the above policy, was made by our field representative on, the date indicated above. The recommendations shown below need your prompt attention. This was a survey only, for the purpose.of aiding us in determining the condition of the property in order to'determine eligibility, proper classification:and. rating of this risk. This survey was not made for any purposes other than those set forth above. We urge you to take whatever action may be necessary to prevent losses, improve and enforce all safety procedures and eliminate any hazardous conditions. Please return this form after you have completed the action required by the recommendations listed. We request that this be done by the date indicated above. A self-addressed, stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Thank you. • Lesley Keenan White Bear Lake Underwriting Department No. RE: 10688 Sherman Dr., Eden Prairie, MN 55347-4448 Date Completed • 1. - Shingles were improperly secured when installed. • 2. Flashing sleeve fasteners are- exposed and unsealed. • 3. Flanges are typically unsealed. 4. Leakage and condensation risks exist. • • • • • t4009(10.90)• " • SEP 8 '96 18:50 ^r T++^a+ �+� nnnv 612 927 6164 PAGE.006 27 CONSTRUCTION CC& I CONSULTING& INSPECTIONS,LTD. August 19, 1996 Ross Peterson Multiventure Properties 4010 West 65th Street, Suite 209 Edina, Mn 55435 Re: Eden Bluff Association Eden Prairie, Mn Dear Ross: As you requested, on 8/16/96 I visited Eden Bluff to take a quick look at the condition of the siding. As you know, I generally charge a fee for this evaluation service, but in this case I have provided the evaluation as a courtesy to you as a long time client. My intention in an evaluation of hardboard siding is to determine if it can be repaired (sealed, partially replaced, primed, painted) or if it is time to prepare for new siding. I currently am inspecting repair work at a 28 unit, 10 year old complex in Minnetonka (Creeks Bend condos) that has hardboard siding. It was decided that one more paint cycle on one building and two more paint cycles on three buildings would be feasible. In the case of Eden Bluff, I do not believe the siding can be "saved" at this point. The condition of the siding and wood trim is beyond that point. As you can see by the enclosed map with ratings, all sides of all buildings are rated 6 or above; most in the 7 to 9 range (1 = very good; PO = very bad). The problems that I viewed are widespread and include the following: 1. The wood trim and fascias are peeling paint in most areas with primary exposure to the sun. It is unclear whether these boards were primed (originally) or not. They certainly were not back sealed. It will be impossible to now paint and not get peeling from "new" areas. Some of the wood is also damaged. • 2. Wax bleeding and resin bleeding is apparent on many buildings, some very seriously. This shows up as dark splotches or streaks. These areas would have to be washed (TSP), primed, and painted to stop the bleeding. Pentagon Towers,Box 36184 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55435 (612)944-7137 FAX(612)944-7018 2 2 3. Growth and buckling are evident on all buildings. Some areas are in a full failure situation with the siding deteriorated. Growth is a softening and thickening of the hardboard along edges, bottoms, and at nails. This is a sure sign of failure. Once growth begins, more water is absorbed and buckling begins. Buckling is bulging between nails. This is widespread. 4. The caulk is of poor quality in many areas (hard; cheap latex). It is splitting and has left openings throughout. There is no chance of having a successful repair, caulk, prep, paint experience at this complex. It would cost the equivalent of the residing of a 6 plex (or more) to paint at this point. I would suggest residing at the earliest time that the association members can afford it. If I can be of professional assistance in specs, bidding, contracts, inspection of residing, please let me know. We are managing 8 to 10 residing projects for associations at any given time. It would cost approximately $110 - $125 per unit for complete professional services from beginning to end. I'll send references if you wish -- and a full proposal as well if your board wants it. In the meanwhile, enclosed are some informative materials. Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, tiarl owL.41// ' 17;G. Russo, Ph.D. dent - CC&I, Ltd. • .,, , EIGHT_ pE )--\-y )- [iAis \OLU\1E 14 • Nl'\lliEIt I I \I t.i s I• I'M(' Hardl)oai'd Headaches: liiotihei• 1.J0000l by Ted Cushman • A. class-action la\e,uir by blasting wood chip, apart ,••.,i;,rtt.,:•rt.61.i .,, • a, ainst rnanuf:lcturers of with a steam-pressure vessel, y.,, ,i 7' ii,m,air...-lte•;lrr If hardboard Is gill in it, early or,rin.lin, the chips hcrveen ' - iiics. rnnil.urdl: tn,tterutis ,� _• ,•tl Its ,t• -\t r`tt ,iilt� stages (Eight-f ennv .\'i u'<, giant steel plates. Ina hard- -Ai t•!u kw. ,n,t/Ilan tine(. 3/96). rlaintltf, claim that I,o:lyd },lint, the fillers :Ire "" „f,�,:nI.. .r. 1,-.1 al lass. the rnatt:rl:Ii has inherent fornretl into ho:lrtls untIrr ; limitnrntns as ,idi, , while high heat anti pre,alre. 4 manufacturers respond In 'wet•proces" h• ardboard that most problem, ,tens manufacture, a slurry of wet ;, from faulty :n,rallarn,n or pulp is pressed :Intl heated to /� maintenance. ,.Inee:e out water and steam, / On closer -irutlne, both It rinine :I dense hoard. Under • - sides may turn out to have these cond(tlons• naturally Ie,ltltllate point, While ,,/furring wood II,nuss create �„ \t- . 1 1 .a-r hardboard is ,`Irtltularl\' vul- a ,troll., I ut.i I its to tIher,. 3= .� t1er:lhlC R, moisture.Ilft', kidders Jt counting for most ut the - "'+ - ..., or homeowne!-, tan in:1kt' .Idhe,lt c h„nil nl the I llll,hrd _ - matter, hotter -- ,,r w„r,c. rr.kluct. ['ruiersturulin,L /lardbuurd. in •'tlr\'-prod',,•' h• arjhoard !" - - I-iarunoart .1 l is made ,II WO,, nlanutat.turrll,, IIr rather I \�'• __ pulp: titers, Hindle, of tlhers, than water moves the fibers II. , . — and fiber fragments pr,,duced r,tntitllticl un fulu,e 12 Y _ . • .. M i I t •- -(� •— �. `P �`� '` `t f a Cellulose Insulation M"laket• y ( Ate.j • t,. ( �,t t�,''.I• ' f , ''= .. Y,4 Guarantees Low F net'°v Costs s 3 . , r r ,t i';r "• 4::._,;.M • •.,+, ,tom}:r, F,Ill: of iellulose insulanon h„nleow•net, mill„nw ltit• ;I ati / . I • ha\'e It Ill,.,tr1,ued that the ,lu.u;ultec.I lure,\ hill h,r tt - ?l � 7 In:uenal is n >uherior /hour its vr.Its In rely house: hIIIII ,i,;, ,I. .. i.'; .'�;�' i r' fy�q for energy-efficient holies. to energy—efficient specifics- `r ,,. They cite its relatively high lions and Insufate,l \etch the err • ! �1• a4r I\-value, resistance tour conlpan\''s "I\ l'ro" tellulo,e. . - "c ' nu,venlent, and low in,tall:I• It a tu,t tine, spend, more on ". - fibs '`. ' t Y 't ! lion cost as qualities that heating !lilt/ Looting than 1( ' +‘' �te•:;Ad `' tontrihute to;tffnrdahle ever the gu,lranteed amount, r f,I „., ,\' ,:It till_S ifl't'll�t„Ill' I,n,illl,e, It, t. bi +• t may¢ ;(ix •"A� �r Unen-'tone Industnr,, :I slake up the tltifetenct•. a t t t 'rI ''�'� major cellulost manulartur Insulant+n h\ !Nell. ,.I i L i 1 l� dt •..� i , -I, • •s . 11 `N.',,i o.a et, is now taking these court•, w'on I ensure energy ' 1 } '4 claims :t step further: under rertl,rnlance. To quality for CreenStone Industries,guarantees lo+v energy hills fire energ i-rated I, new "I�uycr's C hoii c"' the guarantee, the home homes insulrru•d with its "R-Pro“cellulose. pt. ,r[\nt, Greentitone offer- tunnlurt•,I t.rr !mgt. II I 4i19•0 1 / ' It'a Iti-Oti Ly/ t46, 17990 t ,-,Ltrj ------.. —icrl • 12C \ tr. ...::.........: •••••.-:::: -4. :::.p.., 7:•:•:::::: .1;11! 'iiir ez }a) •cr tr) i-- 17690 1 ] E •E . 8 .,-............,... in Q) i•rr'.; rz' (.1, Ti• 0 ItIL " S1790 1.14'w (I) 2 CL 7 , 1 L1790 t • °3 (4--- c 4— .c K-\ D -t- ----)c,-- r-- 0- CO 7:- •,.... r- E —_,„ Cl_ '•:-..: ti.) a L8901 L- h1190 1 -C3 4-) i " '-o D 10901 TO :: ::. 1_1_1 LW 68901 r _ .t_ , 16901 \W` £690 1: 490 1 8 re901 (, , ..it90 1 , S690 1 (1 a L6901 - . . , . :2_,•..,Li.:0-,•;:- ....•::-..... , el q-,- - &.2. Hardboard Headaches. �:: •.- __,_ .: . continued from page 9 --____._._._ - into place in the press, and ' synthetic chemicals— usu- ally heat-curing phenolic . . F.- -:.1 ": adhesives —provide most of - • '44 - _ the adhesive bond in the �C ' i board. . _ . i Dry-process and wet- ,;'. , process manufacturers each • claim advantages for their techniques, but the products i Edge swelling and dimpling around nails are common have much in common. Both ,, ' '--- - . ,i hardboard complaints(above left). Sometimes,severe processes create a dense, eas :,::�� .- ' deterioration follows:A Baltimore-area home ily machined board with • ;�" - inspector was able to poke his finger through rotting consistent dimensions that hardboard siding(above). Installation details can contribute to problems:The hardboard shown at left holds paint well. For purpos-es industryintperformance was placed in direct contact with a roof surface, of contrary to manufacturer instructions. standards, hardboard is hard- board— both types are cov- ered by the same American Hardboard Association (AHA) and American another wood pulp product. solved by water, neither the ble to water intrusion, National Standards Institute But U.S. Forest Products lignin bonds in wet-process through capillary action (ANSI) standards. scientist Charlie Carll says hardboard nor the phenolic when the material is in Attractive to water. chat such a comparison is bonds in dry-process hard- direct contact with water, Because hardboard is made extreme and inaccurate. board are water-soluble. and through the electromag- with wood pulp, some critics While the bonds holding Like natural wood, howev- netic attraction of lignin and have likened it to paper, paper together can be dis- er, all hardboard is vulnera- cellulose molecules, which . �_ , _ . _ pulls water vapor into t e unsig t y appearance around prefinished product). Paint widely ignored. On job sites, material anytime humidity is nails and at joints. And should be reapplied every Bosonctto frequently sees high. unlike wood, which may three years. the instructions"laying in In general, hardboard swells swell but then shrink again, Humidity alone will cause the mud with people stepping more than wood.Since hard- some of hardboard's swelling hardboard to swell. If you're in on them." hoard is denser than wood, is often permanent. an unusually rainy or humid Bosonctto says he often with smaller voids in the Careful installation. climate,you might want to sees hardboard stored in the structure, water intruding Despite hardboard's weakness- look for another material. open on the ground (sec into hardboard quickly runs es,some builders have used it Follow the directions. photo, page 9). "If it rains, out of space and begins to successfully. To re p-thc Har oar •n installed it's a disaster," he says. swell the material. advantage of ardboard's low by unskilled labor. ems Homeowner mainte- Hardboard also swells - mince: Bosonetto's conclu- more than wood in the long sion after years of inspecting dimension. in the manufac- , . "If it has started to decay, new and existing homes is turing process, the fiber ma ,•' �� that although hardboard is laid down randomly, w'' 7 \,, its too late to paint. experiences widespread prob- many fibers running acro-:t v, , - Icros, it can perform well the width of the board (in'' ..`r _ M when cared for properly. "If contrast to wood, where - ust pay attention frequentl 1 when the every three years, you clean almost all the fibers run par- to details. If you uac it where m to isn't handled right. all the mildew off and paint allel to the grain).So thick- it receives a lot of runoff or Every bundle of hardboard it and make sure it is covered ness swelling of fibers makes splashback,or if you put it in siding ships with several sets completely, it will last."The the boards longer. If the contact with the ground or a of instructions that give problem is that most people boards are pinned at the ends roof,you're asking for trouble. details about storage and wait until the damage has - -say, nailed to studs—the Hardboard must be kept handling,correct nailing, started before they act,says length swelling can cause the dry in storage and during and gapping of joints,observes Bosonctto. "lf it has started boards to buckle. installation, and should be Atlanta construction inspector to decay, painting does noth- In addition to buckling, painted immediately when 39 John Bosonctto.The problem ing but seal in the moisture. swellinn can create an installed (better yet, use a is that these directions arc It's too late."0 Memorandum To: Scott Kipp, Community Development From:. Gene Abbott, Assistant Building Official Inspections Department Date: September 17, 1996 Subject: Planning Commission requests regarding the Eden Bluffs Townhomes Development Apparently, the residents of the current townhome project have raised some issues on the quality of workmanship by the Builder. After review of the independent inspections reports and our records I will respond to the issues raised at the Planning Commission meeting. We keep a file in our office of complaint letters from consumers regarding the quality of workmanship from building contractors. As of the date of this letter we do not have any such complaint letters on file for Baton Corporation. These housing units were constructed in 1984, the 1982 Uniform Building Code was in effect at that time. Hardboard siding was an approved material for covering exterior walls and was required to conform to UBC standard No. 25-26. The building contractor was responsible for complying with the State Code as well as manufacturers requirements for installation. Likewise, shingles were to comply with UBC Standard No. 32-3 and be fastened according to manufacturers instructions. Building owners may wish to seek legal advice if there were code violations with respect to installation. All new construction in the city is to conform to the 1994 Uniform Building Code with state amendments. The city will continue to conduct the required inspections as outlined in the Building code. 3Lj EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-5-96 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.e DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH EXPANSION Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: • Adopt an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 5.9 acres. Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its October 14, 1996 meeting. No neighborhood issues were raised at the meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Planning Commission Minutes dated October 14, 1996 2. Staff Report dated October 11, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, October 14, 1996 Page 8 D. VICTORY LUTHERAN CHURCH EXPANSION by Victory Lutheran Church. Request for Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 5.9 acres and Site Plan Review on 5.9 acres. Location: Eden Prairie Road at Berger Drive. Kipp reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of the request. Orlando Narc, representing the church, showed building renderings and additional photographs of the existing building. Wissner inquired about the roof on the addition and Narc responded that it will have just enough pitch to provide drainage. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. Foote commented he supported the project. MOTION: Wissner moved, Ismail seconded, to close the Public Hearing and recommend approval of the Victory Lutheran Church expansion for Zoning District Amendment within the Public Zoning District on 5.9 acres and Site Plan Review on 5.9 acres based on plans dated October 11, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 11, 1996. Motion carried 5-0. 2- STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: October 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Victory Lutheran Church Addition APPLICANT: Victory Lutheran Church LOCATION: 16200 Berger Drive REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment within the Public zoning district on 5.97 acres. 2. Site Plan Review on 5.97 acres. 1 3 �11111� /;41 �■■I /It ,Ar., - ops- .:.- 1 •::,:::,:::•:• 41 ,1s :::•:::::•:•:::::• :t....,,,:.:,....•.....•.. /40i 014, . . LABS . /Aitik A AAti ? Ira 6:: Nv. • ALZ.Nre Cli a L s-. )7 / ( > " PR Wit Mr :' -' llIllIllHillIllIlli ' a. �' , Si C Moo l O l s t L2.-4 'xi% g i__ LE / 101 ZA'' -='. g-1:' ,-,§ f-ARK ./ 1/ j,._:.fzr / ./ AL. ...8.0•41. ill }� l .gyp :� Sc c f • a . .a nnallitat. *gal, :: ::: ::::::::::::•: • : "" k tgialfillrip a � : `y ::::::: :i:::.:.:. = %414111"4,,,i4 ��v � ReIL � j litri a .-� PIO • ( a,„ al .... , 4et, ._ k . .::.ii ::„..;:i :.-:-:: ::4::;:4*: .:i::.w::v::: :::: :: :i ::ziciAtcl,t, •: .:: :.: : :: :: ii:: ;i;i::...:. iii....:; :.:: ; ::?.f ::•. - 5THs .W "ell ••• . •••• ." •••. .: ::::::: •:::: :•::::•:•::•:•:••••• '-' ' ' • ' - 111."g" -.:.. .:.;:::::.... .•;;;;i.:**:::411::iii:. :.*: . :.::: :::*: Mr .4elps• • mit4.- .-... IT. It-111111113 utAVik;; ::Ai .::: :•INEF:.:.:::A lb Ala D.F.: Fp, } !1 � a4Li ay - REir •_ ■ t11101::: Appo �, K ' Ile .: Illa JAI :.•:: ::.. ..: ::::••. 4'). .. . 4pi, .0.101441P,W;) -. MI = rem :: :•:•::::::::•:•:: • :.:*:" :: i `i'. FAIRFIELD Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church Addition October 11, 1996 BACKGROUND The Victory Lutheran Church was approved by the City Council in 1993 for a 9,200 sq. ft. facility. The approved plans also identified a future expansion area to the east. As a condition of approval, the Church was required to return to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval of any future expansion proposal. Surrounding land uses consist of R1-22 residential to the north, east, and south, with County Road 4 abutting the property to the west. SITE PLAN The proposal is to construct a 4,000 sq. ft. single-story addition on the east side of the existing church, with a future second-story expansion potential. The original approval showed a two-story addition for the future expansion area with a similar building footprint. With the addition,the total building square footage is 13,236 sq. ft. The code does not restrict site coverage in the Public district. However, with the addition,the building footprint covers only 3%of the 5.97 acre site. The addition meets all structure setbacks. Church parking requires one stall for every three seats in the largest worship area. The existing parking lot meets this code. The addition is to accommodate more Sunday School classrooms and multi-purpose space. The use of this space will not occur at the same time as the peak use of the church worship space,therefore no additional parking spaces will be required. GRADING AND DRAINAGE No tree loss or significant grading will occur on the property since the original grading provided for the expansion area. A section of retaining wall will be constructed on the south side of the addition. This wall will consist of modular masonry construction. The existing NURP pond to the east of the addition was designed to accommodate the future expansion area, therefore no modification is necessary. LANDSCAPING Landscaping has been added for this proposal meeting City Code. The original landscape plan provided the required screening of the parking area. 2 Staff Report Victory Lutheran Church Addition October 11, 1996 ARCHITECTURE The single-story addition will be constructed in a similar architectural style with similar materials. At least 75% of the structure will be face brick and glass, which meets City Code. The flat roof design is to accommodate a future second-story expansion. No rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed. All mechanical equipment will be placed within the building. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Amendment within the Public district, and Site Plan Review based on plans dated September 19, 1996, this report, and the following: 1. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall submit detailed storm water run-off, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11-5-96 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. 0 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger BARTUS ADDITION Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: • Adopt an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.44 acres; Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its October 14, 1996 meeting. No neighborhood opposition has been received regarding the proposal. The proponent has revised the plans according to the Staff Report recommendations. Supporting Reports: 1. Planning Commission Minutes dated October 14, 1996 2. Staff Report dated October 11, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, October 14, 1996 Page 9 E. BARTUS ADDITION by Dan Bartus. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on .44 acres. Location: Baker Road at St. Andrew. Kipp reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recommended approval of the request and noted the proponent agreed with the stipulations recommended in the staff report. Dan Bartus requested approval of the proposal and stated he will dedicate the easement as required in the staff report. Kipp noted that staff had received calls regarding this proposal but no one objected once they were told it would be a single family home. Ismail commented there would be no entrance from Baker Road but noted that the lowest elevation of the home was close to the street elevation. Bartus stated that there would be a four foot retaining wall on the property. Kipp stated this was not a floodplain issue and there was an existing outlet going to the east and if there were a flood event there was a curb overflow one foot below the elevation of the proposed house, which would provide for drainage on the site. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. Ismail commented he liked and supported the plan. MOTION: Ismail moved, Foote seconded, to close the Public Hearing and recommend approval for Bartus Addition by Dan Bartus for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on .44 acres based on plans dated October 11, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated October 11, 1996. Motion carried 5-0. Z STAI'1 REPORT TO: Planning Commission THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: October 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Bartus Addition APPLICANT: Daniel Bartus FEE OWNER: John Lassen LOCATION: Southwest corner of Baker Road and St. Andrew Drive REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 0.44 acres. 1 3 r.ktigITIVINs-sN',-. y _-_-- --------- _ --- illitiDiit:riAl_VAL — _ --- PAR !tali 4111Allik 't12111111111111ki) a AOPPP \ .:ND *. I \ delir11111111 -,..-M101111. 111.111111 I..L IrIV' • ger . 4 Nwita, I l* 41 -1" 44PAW #* ' . 100° ICs 7411111 ; fumici D81 116.< fle & .0. 0 um a -6,6 at wo oi ..,) . , io le, 11111 Vii:ouRT g ) 0 4016 ...., p AsTLE LA C • 1,t 1 a MO 4.-k 9 ill '-, S- l'. 0 \ 1,) " Ai MN ' ' . MARIAN b ii ! 7 if '----'\ Irr 110 4011111 ' . c)-6i ..AVI-C. IIIIII iss mil . . ..... .. r,, .... se :::j 6 - .VE• 0•• 'Ill I • 111111111/41111.4841111111 rg. r,i zi ill 0., 1 •"• • iii , id 1011 .:0 I Itir; j IN. 01 i•f:' ..4-• ‘114 ..,-.. giPliraigg MOM -s, al' Min mall TO ' 3Allm 3.3X-i. isifiriP-. gyp .,.- -- 21 El - rill Rai ik , 414)1* MI 111P 21 - 0 t: •-• —1 "-- .. ,." •P ...; ,,,-• -3, 0 ok ... -.... . .,. s.: .po,• 6.,Ne X.4 ..g r A Vc1 Ao,.i;:;vt,v,-------- \_..._ •- rP7 11111111:7...i.::..4.':............‘.:,........4111...:::......:..::.::......-....i..:......-....-..: '•'. 4 .4,4\ ..:.:::......arrip 4)4 .. .. ......... . , ,.. r...:,\.. ,....,,......,...1. .,./. ..„... , -PIt, H RD. . ..... .................................. .. .. ... .............-.-.-.-."-- ____, ,44eior _v w it 446..mtat .-..:.:•:-:::-: :•:--:-.-:•:-:-:••::::::IIIIMI D'1 •,- . 41111,0 111 -51) ai .._... . ............ 6s 2 ilii -:: :: : •: : Y.: . & PP c m ...-.-:.• 1-. -- .•-- -..... • . •• 11411 al 0 ''.-.:.. • „„,44 t.,„:4 -0 4 Ak. W •• -4 ; PIPE BLVD --, • ' 4004 4.41 al r, VIP I rc\-1 il TFRRACE, n> A 7111F,,..) , ..,„ . .,.....j, „ . , t4fty Staff Report Bartus Addition October 11, 1996 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan identifies this site for Low Density Residential land use. The property is currently zoned Rural. Surrounding land uses consist of the Southgate single family development to the north, zoned R1-13.5, Baker Road to the east and south, and an existing single family home to the west, zoned Rural. The site received fill about ten years ago in preparation for a house pad. Some scattered non-significant vegetation exists on the site. SITE PLAN The proposal is to rezone the property and construct one single family home. All setbacks are met for the R1-13.5 zoning district. Access to the property will be from St. Andrew Drive. No direct access to Baker Road will be permitted. Since the property is part of a recorded Hennepin County survey of a portion of Auditor's Subdivision 225,replatting of the property will not be required. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Some grading will take place for the proposed walkout design. This includes construction of a four foot retaining wall on the back side of the structure. A small wetland exists in the northeast corner of the site. This wetland will not be impacted by the proposed grading. Currently,the rear portion of the property is used to direct storm water to a wetland on the east side of Baker Road. As part of the review of this project,the proponent shall provide a drainage easement along the rear 25 feet of the property which parallels Baker Road. This easement will protect the existing drainage pattern. The proposed house will have the lowest floor elevation at 864 feet. An overland storm water overflow elevation of 862.94 feet exists along Baker Road. The City requires a minimum separation of one foot. The plan meets this requirement. UTILITIES City sewer and water is available to the site with connection to lines in St. Andrew Drive. 2 S Staff Report Bartus Addition October 11, 1996 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Change from Rural to R 1-13.5 on 0.44 acres, based on plans dated October 11, 1996, this staff report and the following: 1. Prior to grading permit issuance,the proponent shall provide a drainage easement along the rear 25 feet of the property which parallels Baker Road. 3 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/5/96 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS E ITEM NO. v,DE ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger Chapter 11 Amendment to Change Average Setback Jean Johnson Calculation Requested Council Action: First Reading of Ordinance Background: Existing language in the code has been modified so the average front setback will be calculated with the principle structure on either side of a lot. Planning Commission recommended approval of the code change at their October 14, 1996 meeting. Supporting Reports: Memo dated October 2, 1996 Planning Commission minutes of October 14, 1996 Ordinance MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Krista R. Flemming, Planning Intern THROUGH: Jean Johnson and Steve Durham,Zoning Administrators SUBJECT: Chapter 11, Section 11.03, Subd. 3 Special Requirements -Letter C., pg. 11-9 "Average Setback" DATE: October 2, 1996 Existing Code: C. Where 40%or more of a block is developed, the required setback shall be equal to or greater than the average existing setback. (Legal block used) Proposed Change: C. Where 40%or more of a block is developed, the required setback shall be equal to or greater than the average of the principle structure on either side. Background Since 1984, an average of 2 variances per year have been applied for. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments interpretation of the code and decision on theses variances is that the setback relates to adjoining lots, not to the average of the block. City Staff has not experienced a situation where the average block setback produced a functional and aesthetic setback. The average of a block (sample attached) can require a new home setback of 90-110 feet. A setback of this distance requires expensive long driveway and utility costs,and places the new home in the backyards of existing homes. Other Cities City Staff contacted 5 different cities and found that none of these cities used an average setback similar to our code. The cities of Minnetonka, Apple Valley, Burnsville, and Bloomington use a standard minimum setback in each residential zone which is not dependant on the developed area. Edina uses existing principal structures on adjacent properties to create an average minimum setback for the developing project after 25%of the subdivision has been developed. Recommendation Staff suggests that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the code change to the City Council. barb\jean\memos\setback.pc 2 Proposed Setback Code Change The following figure is an example showing the present and proposed code specification. The present code states that if a legal block is 40% or more developed, then the setbacks of the vacant lots shall be portray an average of the developed lots. The proposed code change is to calculate the required setback by averaging the adjacent principle structures instead of using the entire legal block. Pioneer Trail 110' 100' 1 20' 100' 45' ........... •-•—• ........... NER L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 [' LOCK 1 L6 L7 LB-Vacant L9 Ll 0 ............. Nqi 30' 30' 35' 30' Hilltop Road L1 -L10 average front setback = 60' so OR • L7 & L9 average front setback = 33' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11.03 ENTITLED AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. City Code Chapter 11, Sec. 11.03, Subd. 3, C., Shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: C. Where 40% or more of a block is developed, the required setback shall be equal to or greater than the average of the principle structures on either side. SECTION 2. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1996, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1996. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the • -aahy.ad 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, October 14, 1996 Page 9 Commission was that this meeting would not be held. VIII. PLANNERS' REPORTS A. Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual Kipp reviewed the purpose of the manual and its intent which was to create a framework for cohesive design at the Flying Cloud Airport which would provide more uniformity whenever a hangar was constructed or rebuilt. Sandstad inquired if there was any leverage in the manual that could be used to coerce people to follow these guidelines when they did not want to. Kipp responded that if MAC backed the guidelines it would give them more leverage but it will bring some uniformity to the airport if implemented because building permits are required. Compliance with the manual is 100% voluntary but major building proposals will still involve the City review process. Ismail inquired who had building code jurisdiction at the airport and Kipp responded that the City did based on Uniform Building Code. The manual was intended as a recommendation only. Foote inquired if buildings at Flying Cloud had to go through the City and Kipp responded that they had to obtain building permits from the City which will require inspections to be done. Sandstad commented that buildings at Flying Cloud did not have to abide by the Uniform Building Code unless it was a public building because Flying Cloud Airport is federal property. Kipp commented that MAC continues to monitor noise levels at Flying Cloud Airport and the noise abatement signs are in place requesting pilots to use the southern departure route if possible. He noted that the numbers were encouraging. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend approval of the Flying Cloud Airport Design Framework Manual dated July, 1996 and noted that this action in no way reflects the City's position regarding the expansion of the runways. / Motion carried 5-0. V B. Average Setback Code Change Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted that this reflects the actions of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Staff recommended approval of this change. MOTION: Foote moved, seconded by Wissner, to recommend approval of the Average Setback Code change. Motion carried 5-0. C. PUD Minimum Area Code Change Franzen reviewed the staff report and described the benefits of the changes to the City. He noted that developers will have to meet the intent of the Subdivision 4 S EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/5/96 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. K DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger Chapter 11 Amendment Changing Minimum Area for Jean Johnson PUD from 15 to 5 acres Requested Council Action: First Reading of Ordinance Background: In 1982, when the City adopted PUD regulations, the standard was a 15 acre minimum and development applications were for large tracts of land. Today, cities have a 5 acre minimum or no minimum, and development applications will be for smaller tract of land. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the code change at their October 14, 1996 meeting. Supporting Reports: Memo dated October 8, 1996 Planning Commission minutes of October 14, 1996 Ordinance I MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jean Johnson,Zoning Administrator Steve Durham, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subd. 6. Minimum Area DATE: October 8, 1996 Existing Code: Subd. 6. Minimum Area. A PUD Concept must include an area of at least 15 acres. Proposed Change: Subd. 6. Minimum Area. A PUD Concept and Planned Unit Development District must include an area of at least 5 acres. Background The City's PUD Regulations were adopted in 1982 along with the codification of the City Code. In the early 1980's land development applications were typified by areas of 15-100 acres in size. For the last 16 years a 15 acre minimum size for a PUD was functional. The City will see only a few large tract developments in the future. Other developments will be small tracts in the Rural area and in-fill development. Other Cities Other cities have down sized or eliminated a minimum acreage for PUD's, i.e., Bloomington and Burnsville have no minimum and Minnetonka has a 5 acre minimum. It will be important for City Commission and Council to ensure applications meet or exceed the PUD purpose as contained in Subd. 4. Subd.4 Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to: (1) Encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land in the City; (2)Allow variety in the types of environment available to the people of the City; (3)Encourage more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled common open space through the distribution of overall density of population and intensity if land use where such arrangement is desirable and feasible; and, (4)Provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the provisions of this Chapter and Chapter 12 (relating to subdivisions)of this Code while at the same time preserving the health, safety, order, convenience,prosperity, and general welfare of the City and its inhabitants. If the Purpose of a PUD is not emphasized, PUD applications will be a vehicle for variances without the City getting a creative product, a protected environment, and meaningful open space. Small sites, 5+ acres, will be able to benefit from the PUD process whether the project is residential or office/commercial/industrial. For residential(townhouse)projects, the PUD will facilitate the platting of lots around the base of units without the need of applying for variances. For office/commercial/industrial, a mixed-use plan can be developed that places buildings on a site while preserving more trees than would be preserved if each building had to be a lot of a given size with standard setbacks. Another benefit of the 5 acre PUD will be a more streamline development process, cutting 3-6 weeks off review time, if variances through the Board of Adjustments and Appeals is not needed. This proposed code change does not mean that all developments, 5 acres or more, will be reviewed through a PUD process,but those that need the flexibility and meet the PUD purpose will have the PUD process available. Recommendation Staff recommends the PUD minimum be changed from 15 acres to 5 acres. Please consider this change and forward a recommendation on to the Council. barb\jean\memos\cdchnge.pud CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 11, SECTION 11.40 ENTITLED "PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONCEPT" AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. City Code Chapter 11, Sec. 11.40, Subd. 6 Shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: Subd.6. MINIMUM AREA. A PUD Concept and Planned Unit Development District must include an area of at least 5 acres. SECTION 2. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety,by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1996, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1996. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Monday, October 14, 1996 Page 9 C. PUD Minimum Area Code Change Franzen reviewed the staff report and described the benefits of the changes to the City. He noted that developers will have to meet the intent of the Subdivision 4 section in order to qualify as a PUD. The Planning Commission would have to make the determination regarding whether a project would qualify for PUD status under this subsection. Foote inquired why 5 acres was the area proposed. Franzen responded projects less than 5 acres are too small to offer something in return to the City . The City has approved zoning related variances on most projects less than 15 acres, and a reduced area would eliminate additional review by staff and the Board of Appeals. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote,to recommend approval of the code change to reduce the minimum size of a PUD from 15 to 5 acres. Motion carried 5-0. IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Ismail moved, seconded by Foote, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. DATE: 11/05/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: VG, SECTION: Public Hearing DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Vacation 96-09 Engineering Division Vacation of Right-of-Way for Part of Columbine Road in Research Farm 2nd David Olson Addition Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt the resolution vacating right-of-way for part of the Columbine Road extension in Research Farm 2nd Addition. The right-of-way is located south of Anderson Lakes Parkway in the area presently being developed as Staring Lake Townhomes. Overview: The Columbine Road alignment, as platted in Staring Lake curves southwesterly from Anderson Lakes Parkway and will not follow the alignment previously platted in Research Farm 2nd Addition. The property owners have requested the vacation to avoid property title concerns when the ownership transfer of Outlot C, Staring Lake, is completed. Supporting Information: • Easement vacation application • Vacation Drawing CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PART OF COLUMBINE ROAD IN RESEARCH FARM 2ND ADDITION (VAC 96-09) WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie have certain right-of-way described therein as follows: That part of the Public Street(Columbine Road Extension) as dedicated in the plat of Research Farm 2nd Addition, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of Outlot C, Staring Lake, according to the record plat thereof; thence southerly 148.22 feet along the west line of said Outlot C having a radius of 952.73 feet and a central angle of 8 degrees 54 minutes 49 seconds to the east line of said Public Street and the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence southerly 11.78 feet along the southerly extension of said west line having a central angle of 0 degrees 42 minutes 31 seconds to a point of compound curvature; thence southerly 120.71 feet along a 533.58 foot radius curve having a central angle to 12 degrees 57 minutes 41 seconds to the intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 35 feet easterly from the centerline of Columbine Road as dedicated in said plat of Staring Lake; thence southerly 80.27 feet along said parallel line having a radius of 946.73 feet and a central angle of 4 degrees 51 minutes 29 seconds to the south line of said Public Street and there terminating. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 5, 1996 after due notice was published and posted as required by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that the said right-of-way is not necessary and has no interest to the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said right-of-way as above described is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on November 5, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk Z FILE q'6 -0? CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 MITCHELLROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 ATTN: Sharon Sullivan-Alvord Please complete the first half of this form. PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASEMENT VACATION APPLICATION PLEASE CHECK: TORRENS x ABSTRACT FEE OF $200.00 DATE: 10/1/96 RECEIPT: 1. I hereby petition the Council of Eden Prairie to vacate the following: Right-of-Way y Utility Easement Drainage Easement Other (Describe) Legal description, PIN# and location of area proposed to be vacated: SFF ATTACHFD Attach copies of scaled drawings showing in full detail proposed vacation. Name PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA Address 1355 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD #300 Street MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 City, State & Zip Code Telephone Number: (h1 2) 452-5200 ***************************************************************************** 2. Approval Granted: Minnegasco: Acceptable Opposed Conditional Describe U.S. West: Acceptable Opposed Conditional Describe Northern States Power Company: Acceptable Opposed Conditional Describe Paragon Cable: Acceptable Opposed Conditional Describe 3. Publication Date of Eden Prairie News: /o//7 ciee 4. Notification to Adjacent Properties: /6/ 9 91 5. Public Hearing Date: ///_s/ 96, 6. Resolution Number: 7. Council Action: 8. Notice of Completion: 9. Recording Number and Date: 9 f oUTL-C`T C. _ - - w (It \ \ _ `.1"� ` �� v 2 N en M CO ti 0 141. ei- 4 ,oyk c.C). ,v)r, p.; It'i4 i7i,,,. 1 N cV / r - 7 \00 \ p=20' 00 ' 05" R=946. 73 330. 50 SOP ,, ,. „ '1 -.. f'; 16. 01 til E —► Z r \CA' COLUMBINE �B�N i ' R=911;73\_. ..� „ 1 i E , ,_ \ to a , p,9 , '50. .�-- Og - r� 7 • 2 3 • 44�- 5. °° 05 N.5�8•i' 0' 2 % " • 49i" 2$ „ _ 76 .73 L=574 .75 00 6 p' L g52• // 50 i •1$ 0 �37.33 38 R 65 +\ 4 's �► � i 2'g2•23 3 D 6 7 3 L�429.0 \ 66 9g 5�W 1 d-09'31 ' 16 O �J �2 �\ � ' 30 500 ' 22„ R a7 • 136. 00 -�06 h5 R_876 73 �1 . • `%'' ,2$�02 S22' 31 1B W 5 \ co 145. ' �1� 21 i)�' D „E 36. 00 rn 69 5• � ,+ p"1 i 36. 00 32. 00 32. 00 \ 3 Icm \ W �� O -4- 0 0 \ No 04 N o o- \ o / g \ ,4 ,GE �d ooA'& . 86 00 LO N m \ ;,acOo \ N30' 42' 14"E ° s / 66 �P •.,�o' 33' 00 • w 130. 00 6 42' 0 4 3 2 1 Z 0 o F o v- ���°, o� eg 00 ' �� 36. 00 32. 00 32. 00 36. 00 \ si- o co o 0 s r r3 '�� ,Z Ej' ��. S22' 31' 1 g W \ c ^ 34 L. C J) � r �oo es 2 00 3 136. 00 �� \` \ co '' ° 00 A /Yl .�L •^• p �• . �.n �O fin% N :!1 �r TT \ 130. 00 X - w\ \� _"^) 00 `3 0 .cl,CO. OV Iy \, '�/ N30 42' 14"6 Z ID >,t SI• '' r rp LSO \ o p r- , 9 � \ Nw \ 1 ni \ / o•� r10 130 32.00 4 \ w \ O ,L.0 N , ). ,cc\ 1/- s �� O 2 00 6 OO �1 N� 0) a, o0 0'' 6. 25�1 5 '130 ��: 00 � No+o 0o O 36,DO �0 1 \ -�,��� \ \ �� o0 3 s 24 201 I4254 ° 4 o p0 92 g 136• 00 \ �s ,�`� O n o.6• .,n 5 ^ 3 \7 _n 0 VPCITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: prairie SECTION: Payment of Claims 11-05-96 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Payment of Claims VI Checks No. 046708 thru 047178 Action/Direction: Approve payment of claims. COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM DIVISION TOTAL N/A $235.50 LEGAL COUNSEL $17,019.06 GENERAL SERVICES $22,012.33 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $2,388.71 DATA PROCESSING $13,591.81 CITY MANAGER $96.41 FINANCE $209.76 HUMAN RESOURCES $2,192.93 COMMUNITY INFORMATION $6,833.35 ELECTIONS $562.48 ENGINEERING $213.25 INSPECTIONS $262.87 FACILITIES $1,899.37 ASSESSING $170.05 CIVIL DEFENSE $66.40 POLICE $23,034.10 FIRE $271,312.33 ANIMAL CONTROL $155.00 PARK ADMIN $32.50 STREETS & TRAFFIC $38,672.97 PARK MAINTENANCE $65,210.96 STREET LIGHTING $1,455.77 FLEET SERVICES $17,190.20 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $4,381.62 COMMUNITY DEVELOP $479.75 COMMUNITY CENTER $31,036.64 BEACHES $279.10 HISTORICAL $418.03 YOUTH RECREATION $3,460.96 SPECIAL EVENTS $1,462.55 ADULT RECREATION $4,137.65 RECREATION ADMIN $32.33 ADAPTIVE REC $245.00 • OAK POINT POOL $357.97 ARTS $507.75 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $1,268,392.16 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $78,416.25 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $223,338.04 CITY CENTER $16.92 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $8,179.38 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $77,271.95 PRAIRIEVIEW $133,616.85 PRESERVE $40,311.77 WATER DEPT $34,446.20 SEWER DEPT $2,602.15 STORM DRAINAGE $1,609.30 AGENCY FUNDS $11,246.73 EQUIPMENT $12,411.11 $2,423,476.27* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 46709 $240.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46710 $52.00 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC AD DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 46711 $10.60 B DALTON BOOKSTORE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CITY MANAGER 46712 $30.00 BROOKLYN CTR POLICE DEPT SCHOOLS POLICE 46713 $244.66 DONALD URAM CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 46714 $39.66 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL 46715 $45.00 HDR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE WATER UTILITY-GEN 46716 $5,184.00 JASON-NORTHCO L.P. #1 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46717 $15.75 JOHN SAMS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ASSESSING-ADM 46718 $30.00 KAROL ROCKLER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46719 $50.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH SCHOOLS WATER UTILITY-GEN 46720 $45.00 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BIKE REGISTRATIONS FD 10 ORG 46721 $492.37 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ELECTRIC BEARPATH LIFT STATION 46722 $300.00 MPLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE SCHOOLS POLICE 46723 $20.00 PRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF MN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION 46724 $1,000.00 REAL ESTATE EQUITIES HOPE LOAN RECEIVABLE HOPE LOAN PROGRAM 46725 $250.31 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 46726 $55.25 SSPC PUBLICATIONS SALES TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GEN 46727 $136.02 STEVE SINELL MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 46728 $174.66 SUE KOTCHEVAR CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 46729 $5,412.49 SUPPLEES 7 HI ENTERPRISES INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 46730 $40.00 UNIVERSITY OF MN-REGISTRAR,PDC CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 46731 $129.00 UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS CONFERENCE WATER UTILITY-GEN 46732 $36.00 WILS C/O SARA ACKMANN MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 46734 $49.00 AMY JO BINNING LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46735 $40.00 ARDIS & ROBERT MCCARTHY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46736 $20.00 BARB LUSKIN SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS HERITAGE PRESERVATION 46737 $28.00 BARBARA & DAVID STEEN SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 46738 $42.00 BECKY BEIERSDORF LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46739 $161.64 BILL LEMPESIS USE OF PERSONAL AUTO PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 46740 $72.00 CARRIE LAW LESSONS/CLASSES FITNESS CLASSES 46741 $7.50 CHAU HOANG LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46742 $6,293.00 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1994 REHAB 55041 46743 $11.00 DAVID JOHNSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46744 $76.16 DEBORAH CROWLEY LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46745 $14.07 EDEN PRAIRIE SENIORS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FALL SKILL DEVELOP 46746 $80.00 EMILY WAGNER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG KIDS KORNER 46747 $7.50 ERIC CHRISTIANSEN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46748 $20.00 GAIL DAVIS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ADAPTIVE RECREATION 46749 $85.66 GORDON POSHKOFF LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46750 $28.00 HELGA EGERTSON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46751 $5.00 HOLLY RAKOCY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46752 $295.60 JESCO INC DEPOSITS ESCROW 46753 $7.00 JOAN BENSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46754 $28.00 JUDY SCHAFER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46755 $81.00 KEN HANUS LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46756 $18.67 LAURA LIEDTKE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG FALL SKILL DEVELOP 46757 $638.89 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS INSURANCE GENERAL 46758 $225.00 LILA KLEHR OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOCIAL 46759 $3.50 LINDA HUMPHREY LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46760 $62.50 LYNETTE GUST LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46761 $12.00 LYNN RAU LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46762 $4.00 MICHAEL BURNSTEIN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46763 $34.50 MICHELE ELLINGSON LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46764 $20.00 MICHELLE VEITH SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS ADAPTIVE RECREATION COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 46765 $146.50 MID AMERICA FESTIVALS DEPOSITS ESCROW 46766 $28.00 NARCIZA RIDER LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46767 $26.00 PADMA DEVINENI LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46768 $14.00 ROBERT HABSON-EMERSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 46769 $14.00 SHARON FLYNN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46770 $15.00 SUE ZALESKAS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 46771 $24.50 SUSAN HUPP LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46772 $4.00 THOMAS ANDERSON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46773 $8.00 TRACY MERCHANT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG FALL SKILL DEVELOP 46774 $3.50 WENDY BRUCKS LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46775 $282.40 WOODDALE BLDERS DEPOSITS ESCROW 46777 $128.30 ANOKA CO GOVT CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46778 $713.58 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46779 $250.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 46780 $8,170.50 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46781 $545.55 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46782 $4,417.12 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUCT-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46783 $332.00 MINN STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46784 $227.42 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46785 $1,932.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46786 $35.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 46787 $43,896.02 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46788 $25.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46789 $182.00 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46791 $80.36 CYNTHIA LANENBERG USE OF PERSONAL AUTO FIRE 46792 $10,967.30 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 46793 $20,522.16 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46794 $58.00 HOHENSTEINS INC BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46795 $8,774.92 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46796 $922.60 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46797 $534.00 MIDWEST EXPO 96 CONFERENCE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46798 $436.20 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46799 $88.95 THE WINE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46800 $21,841.60 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 46802 $37.00 ANNETTE KUCERA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG KIDS KORNER 46803 $100.00 APPLIED COOKING TECH., JOE MOS VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 46804 $23.90 BARB JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1994 REHAB 55041 46805 $200.00 BUCA AWARDS TOUCH FOOTBALL 46806 $303.53 CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 46807 $15.50 DAVE BUSWELL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ASSESSING-ADM 46808 $741.24 DIAMOND T RANCH SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 46809 $492.03 EDEN PRAIRIE SENIORS MEETING EXPENSES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46810 $250,000.00 EDEN PRAIRIE VOLUNTEER FIRE RE PENSION PLANS FIRE 46811 $376.90 FRANKLIN QUEST OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE ARENA 46812 $5.00 FSI INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL CITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS 46813 $6,596.62 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LICENSES & TAXES PARK MAINT 46814 $42.83 JAMIE FERRISS LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46815 $152.44 JC PENNEY CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 46816 $15.00 JEFFREY RICHARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 46817 $13.50 KAY HENDRICKSON SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46818 $3,200.00 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE LEGAL COUSEL 46819 $975.00 LANO EQUIPMENT INC ORGANIZED ATHLETICS FEES STORM DRAINAGE 46821 $91.00 LISA POLZIN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46822 $13.50 LOIS CAMPBELL SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46823 $5.00 RICHARD AKERLUND ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 46824 $65.76 SHERI L MOONEN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 46826 $75.00 SUE ECK-MAAHS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46827 $28.00 SUSAN KAZMAR ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 46828 $155.29 TARGET FURNITURE & FIXTURES OAK POINT OPERATIONS 46829 $300.00 THE U S CONFERENCE OF MAYORS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 46830 $100.00 TIMBER LODGE STEAK HOUSE AWARDS BOCCE 46832 $641.74 AMERICANA INN CONFERENCE FIRE 46833 $40.00 ARDEN AANESTAD INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46834 $137.06 CIRCUS PIZZA SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 46835 $12.50 CONNIE HAHN LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46836 $11.52 DAVID LINDAHL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1994 REHAB 55041 46837 $28.00 DEBORAH HANSEN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46838 $148.73 DISCOVERY ZONE CHEMICALS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 46839 $109.20 JACK SCHEPERS USE OF PERSONAL AUTO PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 46840 $45.00 JANET DUBOIS INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46841 $42.32 JIM ZAIC MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 46842 $28.00 JOAN CLARK LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46843 $150.00 KELLY NELSON INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46844 $23.00 LAVERNE ANDERSON SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46845 $24.50 LESLIE BULL LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 46846 $16.00 LYNETTE BRANDT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG FALL SKILL DEVELOP 46847 $200.00 PATRICIA & VIRGIL SEIFERT SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 46848 $69.36 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT POSTAGE GENERAL 46849 $54.09 PETTY CASH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ELECTION 46850 $200.00 RONALD G OTTERNESS INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46851 $75.00 SAMUEL FRENCH INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER THEATRE 46852 $3.50 SHEILA FRANK LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46853 $16.00 SHERRI BURKETT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG FALL SKILL DEVELOP 46854 $47.00 SUE BENNETT LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 46855 $8,000.00 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE GENERAL 46856 $3,686.36 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SEWER LIFTSTATION 46858 $641.74 AMERICANA INN CONFERENCE - FIRE 46859 $40.00 ARDEN AANESTAD INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 46861 $400.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46862 $6,734.63 EAGLE WINE COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46863 $22,283.01 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46864 $28,547.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46866 $2,995.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46867 $18,379.67 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46869 $6,662.33 PRIOR WINE COMPANY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46870 $8,116.91 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46872 $1,124.01 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46874 $713.58 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46875 $300.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 46876 $8,170.50 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46877 $545.55 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46878 $4,356.36 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUCT-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46879 $1,306.00 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46880 $332.00 MINN STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46881 $227.42 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46882 $1,932.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 46883 $35.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 46884 $96,183.24 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 46885 $43,452.93 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46886 $282.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE W/H FD 10 ORG COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 46887 $182.00 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 46890 $121.69 HENNEPIN COUNTY WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINT 46891 $150.00 JAMES G. CLARK CONFERENCE POLICE 46892 $59.33 JOHN CONLEY POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE 46893 $250.00 LANA FRIEDRICH ORGANIZED ATHLETICS FEES VOLLEYBALL 46894 $207.00 MARY FREY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 46895 $20.16 MICHAEL W JACQUES USE OF PERSONAL AUTO PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 46896 $30.00 RICHARD C GREEN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ARTS 46897 $16.65 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 46898 $13.61 SANDY WERTS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 46899 $217.96 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 46907 $24.50 SUSAN HUPP LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 46908 $950.00 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 46910 $1,209.89 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE SEWER UTILITY-GEN 46911 $121.72 CLIFF CRACAUER USE OF PERSONAL AUTO EQUIPMENT MAINT 46912 $25.00 DEBBIE TOWEY SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS ADAPTIVE RECREATION 46913 $44,161.27 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC SEWER LIFTSTATION 46916 $2,792.07 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE COMMUNITY SERVICES 46918 $4,854.92 CITY OF RICHFIELD AUTOS P/W REVOLVING FUND 46919 $1,236.25 FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSN PAYING AGENT 2ND SHEET ICE DEBT 46920 $7,255.00 FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC INTEREST IMPV DEBT FUND 46921 $69,125.00 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY INTEREST 89 RECREATION REF 46922 $1,090,906.86 KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 46923 $190.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 46925 $120.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46926 $10,649.48 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46927 $23,001.80 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46928 $15,938.95 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46929 $862.05 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46930 $417.40 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46931 $21,970.05 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46932 $223.59 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46934 $176.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 46935 $100.00 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 46936 $310.00 TARGET CENTER SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 46937 $405.25 THE GUTHRIE THEATER SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 46939 $75.00 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 46941 $132.23 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES VOLLEYBALL 46942 $160.00 A.R.M.A. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 46943 $76.00 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 46944 $10,065.00 AERIAL PAINTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT TCD INVENTORY 46945 $35.00 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CIVIL DEFENSE 46946 $237.32 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46947 $3.00 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 46948 $180.00 AMY LIBMAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 46949 $336.65 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 46950 $479.00 ANDYS PICKUP PALACE NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 46951 $259.55 APPLIED LOCKSMITHING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 46952 $87.50 AQUA ENGINEERING INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINT 46953 $7,688.00 ARTHUR ANDERSON LLP DEPOSITS ESCROW 46954 $7,556.19 ASPEN REACH EQUIPMENT COMPANY AUTOS P/R REVOLVING FD 46955 $73.49 AURORA PICTURES INC SCHOOLS SAFETY 46956 $149.11 B & S TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINT 46957 $93.53 BAN-KOE SYSTEMS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 46958 $9.58 BARBARA STRUWE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 46959 $822.26 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 46960 $1,017.67 BELLBOY CORPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46962 $649.65 BENIEK LAWN SERVICE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINT 1 46963 $9,063.64 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC DESIGN & CONST E.P. TRANSPORTATION PLAN 46964 $76.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ELECTION 46965 $7,131.35 BETH NILSSON INSTRUCTOR SERVICE ICE ARENA 46966 $4,286.04 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINT 46968 $34.30 BILL OLSON LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL PARK MAINT 46969 $39,337.00 BLACK & VEATCH DESIGN & CONST 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 46970 $651.23 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 46971 $16,236.24 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION DESIGN & CONST PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM 46972 $490.43 BRO-TEX INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 46973 $436.22 BRW INC DESIGN & CONST DELL ROAD 46974 $1,916.01 CAMAS-SHIELY DIVISION GRAVEL STREET MAINT 46975 $12,887.15 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS OTHER EQUIPMENT FIRE 46976 $486.55 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 46977 $702.87 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 46978 $261.90 CHAPIN CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN I LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING CUB FOOD STORE CONSTRUCTION 46979 $602.00 CHRIS JESSEN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADULT HOCKEY 46980 $155.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 46981 $62.43 CLARK BOARDMAN CALLAGHAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS STORM DRAINAGE 46982 $12,857.00 CLEAN SWEEP INC ASPHALT OVERLAY STREET MAINT 46983 $760.50 CLUTS 0 BRIEN STROTHER ARCHITE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 46984 $169.00 CO 2 SERVICES CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 46985 $494.34 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 46986 $15.00 COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 46987 $846.55 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER UTILITY-GEN 46968 $298.20 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 46989 $202.86 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT TRAINING SUPPLIES SAFETY 46990 $26.50 COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOC PRINTING POLICE 46991 $32.90 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 46992 - $82.04 CRESCENT ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET LIGHTING 46993 $260.84 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 46994 $584.02 D C HEY COMPANY OFFICE EQUIP MAINT WATER UTILITY-GEN 46995 $5,077.00 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL IN BUILDING CC CAPITAL OUTLAY 46996 $118.72 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 46997 $1,535.75 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 46998 $225.38 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 46999 $726.01 DELEGARD TOOL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47000 $18.00 DEM CON LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINT 47001 $60.00 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PREPAID EXPENSES LIQUOR STORE #3 47002 $430.85 DIESEL SERVICE COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47003 $1,554.00 DONLANE SPORTSWEAR CLOTHING & UNIFORMS COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47004 $495.76 DONS SOD SERVICE LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL ROUND LAKE 47005 $475.08 EARL F ANDERSON SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNALING 47006 $362.47 EASTMAN KODAK CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 47007 $90.53 ECOLAB INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EPCC MAINTENANCE 47008 $17.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 47009 $357.76 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47010 $20.00 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47011 $198.25 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N CITY CENTER GROUNDS MNTC TEEN WORK PROGRAM 47012 $1,092.50 EDINA S W PLUMBING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 47013 $1,110.00 EKLUNDS TREE AND BRUSH DISPOSA WASTE DISPOSAL TREE REMOVAL 47014 $44.41 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALING 47015 $233.20 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 47016 $2,812.23 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC DEPOSITS ESCROW 47017 $398.99 FIBRCOM COMMUNICATIONS POLICE 47018 $8,475.00 FINLEY BROS INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR MILLER PARK 47019 $9.00 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 47020 $45.05 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 47021 $900.00 FOCUSED TRAINING SYSTEMS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 47022 $50.00 FRANK LAVALLE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 47023 $79.88 FUN SERVICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 47024 $885.17 G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47025 $45.00 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 47026 $2,044.83 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 47027 $20.51 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE 47028 $436.74 GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPA CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 47029 $2,560.42 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY SMALL TOOLS TCD INVENTORY 47030 $110.90 GILLUND ENTERPRISES LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINT 47031 $177.29 GINA MARIAS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 47032 $84.46 GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 47033 $214.09 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47034 $206.05 GROVE NURSERY CENTER LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL MILLER PARK 47035 $4,500.20 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON DESIGN & CONST COLUMBINE ROAD 47036 $479.56 HARMON AUTOGLASS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47037 $13.00 HAWK LABELING SYSTEMS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47038 $79.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE ENGINEERING DEPT 47039 $401.25 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 47040 $2,818.40 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE SCHOOLS FIRE 47041 $898.60 HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURIN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47042 $3,635.41 HORIZONGRAPHICS PRINTING COMMUNITY SERVICES 47043 $67.50 IMPULSE SALES & DISTRIBUTION MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 47044 $318.44 INLAND TRUCK PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47045 $89.30 J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC SCHOOLS SAFETY 47046 $130.63 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 47047 $200.20 JEFFREY CORDES USE OF PERSONAL AUTO TREE DISEASE 47048 $867.00 JOHN MICHELAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 47049 $850.96 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC PRINTING RECYCLE REBATE 47050 $12,016.07 KODET ARCHITECTURAL GRP LTD DESIGN & CONST PW STORAGE FACILITY 47051 $164.57 KOSS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ROUND LAKE 47052 $74.20 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47053 $900.00 KUNDE CO INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 47054 $98.35 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC SCHOOLS SAFETY 47055 $2,763.58 LAKE REGION VENDING MISC TAXABLE PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 47056 $37,090.00 LAKELAND INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS MARKETCENTER STREETSCAPE 47057 $3,413.16 LAMETTRYS COLLISION CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47058 $25,764.06 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 47059 $124.88 LANO EQUIPMENT INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINT 47060 $144.00 LARAE SCHWINEFUS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 47061 $385.00 LEE BRANT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 47062 $446.00 LEE RAY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 47063 $15,242.34 LOGIS LOGIS SERVICE WATER UTILITY-GEN 47064 $202.50 LOIS NEREIM WILDER INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 47065 $126.20 LUSIAN ELECTRIC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 47066 $237.57 LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY BUILDING MATERIALS ROUND LAKE 47067 $1,429.70 MASYS CORPORATION CONTRACTED COMM MAINT POLICE 47068 $413.00 MEDICINE LAKE LINES TRANSPORTATION ADULT PROGRAM 47069 $606.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 47070 $2,318.16 MENARDS CLEANING SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 47072 $104.01 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 47073 $40.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 47074 $51.70 METRO RESOURCES UNLIMITED OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINT 47075 $177.84 METRO SALES INCORPORATED OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47076 $246.00 METROPOLITIAN MECHANICAL CONTR REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 47077 $41,082.47 MICHAEL J WILKUS ARCHITECTS IN DESIGN & CONST CUB FOOD STORE CONSTRUCTION 47078 $210.00 MICROBILT CORPORATION CONTRACTED COMM MAINT POLICE 47079 $96.79 MID AMERICA POWER DRIVES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47080 $142.04 MIDAS EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47081 $31,088.53 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION ASPHALT OVERLAY SEWER LIFTSTATION 47083 $658.98 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ELECTION 47084 $589.51 MINNESOTA CONWAY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 47085 $92.00 MINNESOTA COUNTIES INS TRUST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 47086 $271.58 MINNESOTA VALLEY WHOLESALE LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL REFORESTATION 47087 $140.15 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING INSPECTION-ADM 47088 $326.80 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47089 $189.66 MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47090 $645.06 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 47091 $488.93 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIBUTING MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 47092 $1,309.29 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 47093 $12.77 NORTHERN EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47094 $800.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT 92 STATE AID DEBT 47095 $295.10 OFFICE MAX OFFICE SUPPLIES STREET MAINT 47096 $287.72 OHLIN SALES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 47097 $334.35 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CO INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET LIGHTING 47098 $628.35 OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENTS INC MOWING STREET MAINT 47099 $32.33 PAPER DIRECT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RECREATION ADMIN 47100 $48.47 PAPER WAREHOUSE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUNBONNET DAYS 47101 $465.00 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HEALTHSYS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 47102 $516.89 PARKSIDE PRINTING INC PRINTING SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 47103 $39.00 PAULETTE MARINI INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 47104 $10.00 PEPPER OF MINNEAPOLIS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ART & MUSIC 47105 $197.65 PEPSI COLA COMPANY BEER 6/12 SKATING RINKS 47106 $390.00 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC SCHOOLS POLICE 47107 $50.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS INTL PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM HUMAN RESOURCES 47108 $249.23 PH WAREHOUSE SALES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47109 $1,335.65 PINK COMPANIES OTHER EQUIPMENT CC CAPITAL OUTLAY 47110 $816.65 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 47111 $32.50 PLANNER PADS OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK/REC ADMIN 47112 $1,258.00 PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MILLER PARK 47113 $124.61 PORTICO COMPUTERS II INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47114 $502.45 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC AWARDS BASKETBALL 47115 $111.90 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 47116 $66.98 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47117 $$94.23 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING SUNBONNET DAYS 47118 $8,602.01 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL INC CHEMICALS PARK MAINT 47119 $75.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 47120 $14.38 PRO SOURCE FITNESS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FITNESS CENTER 47121 $80.00 PSQ BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS IN CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 47122 $3,409.68 PULTE HOMES SYSTEM ACCESS-SEWER BLDG SURCHARGE 47123 $23.96 RC IDENTIFICATIONS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 47124 $412.58 RESPOND SYSTEMS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47125 $269.79 RICHARD SCHUTROP HOMES BUILDING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 47126 $10.00 RICHFIELD PLUMBING PLUMBING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 47127 $626.86 RICOH CORPORATION CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, OCT 30, 1996, 3:27 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 47128 $4,129.21 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2MG ELEVATED TANK 47129 $70.63 RITZ CAMERA EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 47130 $285.00 RUFF-CUT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES DEER CONSULTANT 47131 $148.57 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SOCIAL 47132 $30.00 SANDY WORM OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 47133 $290.24 SHAKOPEE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47134 $39.41 SIGNUM GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNALING 47135 $402.75 SKYWAY TENT RENTAL INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL STARING LAKE CONCERT 47136 $299.50 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 47137 $91.03 SNYDER DRUG OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47138 $115.02 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 47139 $24.81 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS PARK MAINT 47140 $6,661.97 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI CABLE TV GENERAL 47141 $912.76 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING GENERAL 47142 $108.00 SPORTS WORLD USA INC REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES VOLLEYBALL 47143 $12,633.12 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC DESIGN & CONST SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD 47144 $4,195.25 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY OFFICE SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 47148 $1,319.64 STANDARD SPRING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47149 $42.34 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 47150 $2,273.49 STREICHERS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 47151 $23.49 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47152 $366.02 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 47153 $25.00 SUPREME COURT CONTINUING EDUCA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 47154 $105.44 THE DALE GREEN COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 47155 $63.55 THE PROMOTION GROUP SAFETY SUPPLIES SAFETY 47156 $2.00 THE TORO COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47157 $716.12 THE W GORDAN SMITH COMPANY LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINT 47158 $1,595.52 THE WORK CONNECTION OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINT 47159 $15.80 THERMOGAS COMPANY MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47160 $150.15 THOMPSON PLBG SYSTEM ACCESS-WATER FD 10 ORG 47161 $178.70 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 47162 $509.97 TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 47163 $50.00 TRANS UNION CORP OF MPLS/ST PA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 47164 $2,756.43 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY CHEMICALS RICE MARSH LAKE PARK 47165 $137.77 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINT 47166 $78.65 U S TOY CO/CONSTRUCTIVE PLAYTH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPECIAL EVENTS 47167 $1,194.65 UNIFORMS UNILIMITED CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 47168 $129.27 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47169 $255.27 W W GRAINGER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47170 $540.35 WARNING LIGHTS OF MINNESOTA SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNALING 47171 $105.81 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 47172 $475.14 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 47173 $2,578.51 WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE WATER METER RDG 47174 $150.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 47175 $415.48 WESTWELD SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINT 47176 $795.00 WILBUR W SCHULTZ OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 47177 $93.62 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 47178 $1,938.81 ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL TASTE OF PRAIRIE $2,423,476.27* EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 10/29/96 ITEM N¢ SECTION: Petitions and Requests —lily DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Recreation and Facilities; Funding Request for Senior Center Canopy Sandy Werts The Senior Center Advisory Board discussed the merits of having a covered walkway into the building at the rear entry. This is the entry that receives the most use as it opens directly into the largest meeting space. At their October 2, 1996 meeting, the Advisory Board passed unanimously the following motion: The Senior Center Advisory Board requests the City Council authorize funding for the construction of a canopy for the rear entry to the Senior Center. One cost estimate has been received from Hoigaard's for $8,769.00 to construct a 8' x 4' x 42' canvas canopy at the rear entrance. This canopy would extend from the door to the parking lot. The quote includes supplies and installation, but does not include lighting. A canvas canopy has an 8 - 10 year life expectancy with an approximate $4,500 replacement cost. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: November 5, 1996 SECTION: Petitions, Requests and Communications DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request from ITEM NO. Engineering Residents to Address Upcoming VIII. B. Expansion of County Road 4 Between Highway 5 & Pioneer Trail Requested Action: Recommend that this petition be referred to Staff and that Staff report back to the Council following the November 7 neighborhood meeting. Background Information: Our Engineering Staff, together with Hennepin County Public Works, has set up an open house meeting with the residents of this neighborhood in order to address questions that have surfaced regarding the upcoming expansion of County Road 4 between Highway 5 & Pioneer Trail. Notices have already been sent for this meeting which is scheduled for Thursday, November 7, beginning at 5:30 p.m. with a formal presentation at 7:00 p.m.. At this meeting Hennepin County officials will be prepared to address any changes in the constuction plans, which have given rise to concerns on the part of residents abutting the project construction limits. Hennepin County plans to award a contract for this project early next spring. Prior to advertising for bids the County will need to have City Council approval of the final plans and specifications. That action is anticipated for January or February of next year. Fonn aulcouncil\agn-form.wpd Rev 12/4/95 ` . F ffe, Ms . Joyce Provo City Manager's Office Eden Prairie City Center Eden Prairie, Mn October 17 , 1996 This letter is sent as a request for time to be allocated during the next 1 City Council meeting on November 5 , 1996, to address the upcoming expansion of County Road 4 between Highway 5 and Pioneer Trail . Several residents , have received requests from the County to purchase permanent easements from them in conjunction with the expansion. As recently as two weeks ago, we were of t)e opinion that this expansion would - not affect our property lines . There seems to be a major communication breakdown between County & City governments and your constituents . As this may severely impact property values and lifestyles along this corridor, we would like to present what we have learned .to the Council in hopes of getting some answers . We have been told that proposals will be given to property owners in early December and that we have 30 days in which to respond. Time is of the essence. Your prompt consideration will be greatly appreciated! ! ! Concerned Eden Prairie Residents : f6 3t � dir4V _ � 3�' f',�,.� 93 7-/5-�� . %�! 8 mho , _, - �sz5 �, /3i 87;4 en-H-o-n&oDd 141 I3�69L" CAif_C L.I/ so� ()ZL5 G-Tonz..do0 J LA/ 4 H9.D1&� C Q/L—rrEt /eas-37 vJeA . , L ci37-Y/laa- )\\ClJucs... �-,c-"\e. I(o/7G KNO1((ekk i � 37-.5(02,5 C'I'Lo - ps') Pm Cu/-It%�--y_occ` .( Lh. `�3 -6' 5 49i6,,,t/ :` -<� �73�6-,-17C,1 --,i,,,1 ( k 7-odr. Lt.726 Ca(th haAl;ir ON S/ '4 -- r_(/7 (.e,,Z, /// /, 1 e-tZ �Ls 7C�� , � '�Ck czc 1.l1 /U i Li. '(\o' 1 L:,',(,,,,'.1:1„,,,/-4-44-'1.-41P, L. : f--(1"-1/' 76-;/LIS---61155((e7.5- I (//a7 `' r t / a • • Ms . Joyce Provo City Manager's Office Eden Prairie City Center Eden Prairie, Mn October 17 , 1996 This letter is sent as a request for time to be allocated during the next City Council meeting on November 5 , 1996, to address the upcoming expansion of County Road 4 between Highway 5 and Pioneer Trail . Several residents, have received requests from the County to purchase permanent easements from them in conjunction with the expansion. As.. recently as two weeks ago, we were of the opinion that this expansion would not affect our property lines . There seems to be a major communication breakdown between County & City governments and your constituents . As this may severely impact property values and lifestyles along this corridor, we would like to present what we have learned to the Council in hopes of getting some answers . Issue and concerns attached. We have been told that proposals will be given to property owners in early December and that we have 30 days in which to respond. Time is of the essence. Your prompt consideration will be greatly appreciated! ! ! Concerned Eden \Prairie Residents : C 'tea 4 1.-"+"". S p7 , Ct7.0`"'l`J e..r- 1-Dv-i v-c 1CT l— 4+ -1 .. \Tr t(02Mn e tnd►ew ooci PkW ci - oa , , w¢;5 Endir Irc;i I - 9O -`iS'7 $ 41.e.A55 a f i(,Zc13 Cr ndlt c we f((k)"l q-i'1 69� LAarz-i eniditp4 vc,j2ty $�L(c' End;c of1 Trot t L °137-51 gS' AAA L, ✓ ( .-CA. 13 C nS(co t E / 3 V O 7 d7 ;72. \_arti 6_41 __w,\ PA& Cr /4 z1 ,fir. 93 72//9S a6(9 �f( O 7-o.381/ 5 8 cat le44Pgel93 Y- ys s7 80/1,0A . ?-krigon 1(0,06cce,yr--A . 7 5 7 1 cf Qcv.ox t.J -G,r ,R. Rci . 131 F -211 Ms . Joyce Provo City Manager's Office Eden Prairie City Center Eden Prairie, Mn October 17 , 1996 This letter is sent as a request for time to be allocated during the next City Council meeting on November 5 , 1996, to address the upcoming expansion of County Road 4 between Highway 5 and Pioneer Trail . Several residents , have received requests from the County to purchase permanent easements from them in conjunction with the expansion. As recently as two weeks ago, we were of the opinion that this expansion would not affect our property lines . There seems to be a major communication breakdown between County & City governments and your constituents . As this may severely impact property values and lifestyles along this corridor, we would like to present what we have learned to the Council in hopes of getting some answers . We have been told that proposals will be given to property owners in early December and that we have 30 days in which to respond. Time is of the essence. Your prompt consideration will be greatly appreciated! ! ! Conc rne�„ ' E en Prairie Residents : kice �i---) �. - 76 Z7 Z a .B/,/ Drr✓Q t/ Ms. Joyce Provo City Manager's Office Eden Prairie City Center Eden Prairie, Mn October 17 , 1996 This letter is sent as a request for time to be allocated during the next City Council meeting on November 5 , 1996, to address the upcoming expansion of County Road 4 between Highway 5 and Pioneer Trail . Several residents, have received requests from the County to purchase permanent easements from them in conjunction with the expansion. As recently as two weeks ago, we were of the opinion that this expansion would not affect our property lines . There seems to be a major communication breakdown between County & City governments and your constituents . As this may severely impact property values and lifestyles along this corridor, we would like to present what we have learned to the Council in hopes of getting some answers . Issue and concerns attached. We have been told that proposals will be given to property owners in early December and that we have 30 days in which to respond. Time is of the essence. Your prompt consideration will be greatly appreciated! ! ! Concerned E n Prairie Residents: , � �� / C� Atzititizt 7/zek , Y9 93 � ISSUES AND CONCERNS 1 . What has changed from the original proposal to now require the purchase of substantial permanent highway easements from the bordering landowners . As recently as October 2nd, the City stated that most properties would not be affected and the berm and landscaping on the west side would remain substantially intact . 2 . The original proposal called for a more pronounced drop in the grade of the road than is now planned. 3 . Now that the road will come substantially closer to the property lines on both sides , we feel this warrants a reduced speed limit as children will be playing 10 feet from the road. 4. The closer proximity to the road will create a greater noise level for homeowners directly on the road as well as those in at least 500 feet from the road. This could be appeased with the installation of a sound barrier/fence and a reduction in maximum load limit to eliminate the large trucks which account for that noise. 5. The city's comprehensive trail plan allows for trails on both the east and west side of County Road 4, however, as most of us who live on the road can attest to, the current trail is very rarely used as it is . On a sunny summer day, you may be able to count 10-12 individuals on that path between Pioneer Trail and Scenic Heights Road. Elimination of one of these paths would reduce the money taxpayers will have to spend to acquire the easements and money needed to install and upkeep that path. 6 . What 's going to happen to the telephone poles currently on the road? 7 . What restrictions will be placed on any County road signs? 8 . Where will stop signs and/or street lights be placed? 9. How will you as our elected officials assure that we are indeed made whole after all is finalized and to assure that our properties continue to possess the same physical attributes and quality of landscaping that they currently have. 10 . Much thought has been given to assure that motorists using this road will have a safer road to drive. We feel that this has been done at the expense of the safety of those living on the road. This is a residential area south of Scenic Heights . Please address how you will assure the safety of those residents along both sides of the road. s — a - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mayor and City Councilmembers THROUGH: Eugene A. Dietz, Director of Public Works FROM: Rodney W. Rue, Assistant City Engineer GO DATE: November 1, 1996 SUBJECT: CSAH 4 Improvements (from Terrey Pine Drive to CSAH 1) We have been asked to provide you a sequence of events that have occurred over the past few years while attempting to get CSAH 4(between Terrey Pine Drive and CSAH 1) improved. The following is a brief chronology from project conception to the current scheduling: • On September 26, 1988, a letter was sent to Hennepin County requesting that CSAH 4 be included in their Capital Improvement Project List as soon as possible. • On April 24, 1989, another letter was sent to Hennepin County requesting that CSAH 4 improvements be placed in the County's Capital Improvement Project List within the next two or three years. • On May 17, 1989, we received a letter from Hennepin County suggesting that the CSAH 4 improvements be delayed in order to be built concurrently or incorporated with the Trunk Highway 212 improvements. As a result, Hennepin County agreed to construct a southbound bypass lane on CSAH 4 at Scenic Heights Road, to widen CSAH 1 at the CSAH 4 intersection and install a temporary traffic signal, and to widen CSAH 4 from Terrey Pine Drive to Timber Lakes Drive. • On April 21, 1993, a meeting was held to present the initial layout to the City for the CSAH 4 improvements from Terrey Pine Drive to CSAH 1. During the meeting, numerous comments were provided and a lot of discussion took place regarding trees, wetlands, utilities, typical section, etc. This initial layout included a four-lane divided roadway throughout the entire section with numerous right turn lanes and trails on both sides of the road. This layout did create some serious impacts to adjacent property owners. Over the next several months, additional meetings were held, review comments were provided,layout modifications were made(including eliminating many right turn lanes and the center median between Scenic Heights Road and Cedar Ridge Road), and discussions occurred with some property owners. • On July 9, 1993, Hennepin County submitted an application for Surface Transportation Program Funding for these CSAH 4 improvements. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Division, Department of Public Works Memorandum to City Council CSAH 4 Improvements (from Terrey Pine Drive to CSAH 1) November 1, 1996 Page 2 of 2 • On March 17, 1994, an informational meeting was held to discuss the proposed layout plan(with approximately 70 people in attendance). Many questions and concerns were brought up at the Open House and Informational meeting. Following that meeting, a memo was sent to all residents explaining Hennepin County and/or City of Eden Prairie responses or solution to the many questions and concerns that were raised. In addition, the memo notified the residents about the scheduled date for City Council consideration of the preliminary layout approval. A copy of this memo was also sent to the City Council members for informational purposes. • On April 19, 1994, the City Council approved (by Resolution No. 94-59)the preliminary layout plan for these CSAH 4 improvements. The approved layout was consistent with the layout presented at the neighborhood meeting. Since the layout was approved, Hennepin County has been working on the necessary Federal documentation and construction plans. The construction plans are consistent with the Council approved layout with a few minor exceptions. • On October 24, 1996, Eden Prairie received "draft" final construction plans for these improvements. We immediately set up an informational meeting/open house for November 7, 1996 to present the "draft" plans for property owner input and comment. Within the next couple months,Hennepin County will be requesting City Council approval of the final construction plans and construction cooperative agreement. At this time, a scheduled date for those approvals has not been set. RWR:ssa Disk:RR:CSAH4-IM.PRO • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Division, Department of Public Works el CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Petitions, Requests and Communications November 5, 1996 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Engineering REQUEST FROM POST CONSTRUCTION VIII. C. REGARDING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Requested Action: It is recommended that the Council take no action on this request at the present time, and that this matter be referred back to Staff for inclusion on a future Council agenda following the proposed neighborhood meeting. Background Information: Post Construction has received Preliminary Plat Approval and First Reading for their proposed seven lot development along Sunnybrook Road. We have been discussing with them the various options for constructing the required public improvements for both Sunnybrook Road and their property as well. Post is wanting the City's approval at this time for them to be able to construct all of the improvements on their property plus those on Sunnybrook Road which would also abut their property. They believe that it may be possible that their costs will be lower with this plan rather than lumping all of the work together under a City assessment project with Sunnybrook Road. They would need a private cost participation agreement with two other property owners to make their plan feasible. At this time we are not aware that they have secured such commitments. We believe that the best process for all the property owners involved in this neighborhood is to put all the street and utility work together as one City Improvement Contract. A new Feasibility Report would be prepared and a Public Hearing process conducted. Post Construction has no experience with Public Works contracts which makes us hesitant to allow them to proceed on their own. Also, allowing Post to do only a portion of the total project will apparently increase the cost for the other residents to the west along Sunnybrook Road. It was our understanding with Post Construction that a neighborhood meeting would be held in the near future to see if we could arrive at a plan acceptable to most, if not all of the residents, including Post Construction. City Council review and action would be more appropriately scheduled to occur following this neighborhood meeting. I TEL No . 6129960785 Oct 27 ,96 22 :54 P .01 &7)-V1 C Post Construction, Inc. Designers and Builders of Fine Custom Homes October 28,1996 Carl Jul& City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,Minnesota 55344 RE: Request to be added to the November 5,1996 agenda Dear Carl, Post Construction, Inc. desires to be on thc 11/5/96 City Council agenda to receive approval to construct Sunnybrook Road further to the west. Specifically,Post desires to develop Sunnybrook Road from the existing Sunnybrook Woods development (Kroiss) to the west boarder of the Post/Jackson property. As discussed,the reason we are requesting to complete the additional work along Sunnybrook Road is due to the fact that the City has imposed additional costs to Post for extra sewer depth,nurp pond size,mitigation credits,and engineering costs. Since thc 7/2/96 preliminary plat approval, Post has been advised by the City that the nurp pond must he increased from 6,500 square feet to 9,300 square feet (43% increase) most of which is required by the City to drain/filter non Post land. This pond size increase further requires enlarged storm pipes. Additionally, the sanitary sewer depth increased from a 1995 city proposal of 10-12 feet to 23+ fret and Post Construction has Incurred additional engineering costs. These additional requirements would impose thousands of dollars in unanticipated costs to Post. Farther, Post has incurred significant costs associated with this development being delayed. Post cannot allow this development to be delayed any longer-and I need your help to ensure this_proem is expedited. Lastly, as we discussed, you will arrange for a neighborhood meeting (no later than next week) where we will advise the neighbors specifically why Post is requesting relief for these extra Costs and possibly ask the neighbors (or thc City) to pay for these extras- otherwise this project may not be feasible fur Post to develop. Sincerely, Rfx Barry Post Post Construction,Inc. Attachment CC: John Brian Post 8911 York Circle • Bloomington,MN 55431 R Phone(612)895-6197/Fax(612)941-7980 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/96 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities ITEM NOEe DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Landscaping Request from The Trails Association Recreation and Facilities, Board Stuart A. Fox E1C Attached to this memo is a request from The Trails Association Board of Directors to transfer ownership of a bituminous trail within The Trails Association property to the City in exchange for some landscaping along Anderson Lakes Parkway. The Board of Directors has been discussing the issue of trail maintenance and liability with the City for a couple of years and this issue was forwarded to the City Council last September for consideration. Currently,.the City has a trail which dead ends in the middle of The Trails property, ending on one of their private driveways. From that point north, the trail belongs to the Association and it is the maintenance and liability of this trail section that has become an issue. Staff has evaluated the trail surfacing and the location and feels that a trail use and maintenance easement can be worked out to cover this section of trail. Offer by the Trails Association Board The Trails Association Board has proposed that the City provide for 45 spruce trees in return for a trail easement over this trail section. Staff has visited the site and reviewed the proposed landscape plan prepared by Bachman's Nursery. The staff would offer some of the following observations regarding the plan: • Trees selected are four foot Colorado Spruce trees which will grow well in most conditions; however, the staff has some concern about their placement in the shade of over-story deciduous trees. The City can purchase these trees directly from a wholesale nursery supplier at a cost of approximately $35/tree or $1,500-$1,600 total cost. • Staff would recommend that The Trails Association reconsider the proposed plant material since much of it would be in the shade of larger deciduous trees. Potential shade tolerant trees that could be planted in lieu of the Colorado Spruce are: Techny Arborvitae or Balsam Fir. • Staff feels that either of these trees would provide the desired effect of screening the townhouses from Anderson Lakes Parkway traffic. RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that if the agreement is to exchange plant material for a trail easement through this townhouse association, the planting work could be done for approximately $1,500 as opposed to the $7,500-$8,500 estimate that The Trails has submitted along with the request. If acceptable to the City Council, staff would purchase the plant material and utilize the Sentence to Serve (STS) staff to plant and mulch the trees. This work could be done in late April or early May of 1997. If acceptable to the City Councci, staff would work with the Directors of the Trails Association to better define the landscape plan and have the area checked for underground utilities prior to any actual planting. SAF:mdd • Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 Hilgeman noted on page 3, the last paragraph, change the second sentence to . . . She was opposed to asphalt trails in the Edenbrook Conservation Area. MOTION: Jacobson moved, seconded by Bowman, to approve the Minutes of the September 16, 1996 Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission as amended. Motion carried 7-0. IV. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Request from the Trails Association Regarding Trail Easements Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated October 16, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; a letter dated September 24, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources; an invoice dated March 22, 1996, from Bachman's Nursery; and a letter dated September 19, 1996, from Jerry Quinn, Director of the Trails Association. Lambert indicated for many years the Trails Association assumed this property was a city owned trail and they never maintained it or improved it. After researching the situation, it was learned that it was supposed to be given to the City for dedication by the developer but he never did that. It's their trail. Some of the property owners wish to have it removed and others were adamant in favoring keeping the trail because they use it. Staff brought this to the City Council about a year and half ago and they were in favor of doing whatever it took to keep that trail. The Trails Association has made a decision to transfer the ownership of the trail to the City under the condition that the City would do some landscaping on their property to better screen their property from Anderson Lakes Parkway. They had plans drawn up through Bachman's Nursery which indicate a cost of about$8,700 for 45 spruce trees. The City Forester looked at the soils and the shade there and recommended Arborvitae or Balsam Fir for better screening and survival. The City can purchase these trees directly from a wholesale nursery at a cost of$35/tree or $1,500-$1,600 total cost. Staff recommended doing this because this is a critical trail link. Koenig was concerned about the condition of the trail. Lambert indicated there are some sections that are pretty bad. This is a six-foot trail which staff 2 2. Unapproved Minutes Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 would recommend widening to an eight-foot trail next year to be consistent with the public trail system. It was estimated to cost between $3,000 and $3,500 if staff does it. Hilgeman asked if that would be paid for through cash park fees for 1997. Lambert stated it would. Hilgeman commented the total cost for landscaping and widening the trail would be about$5,000. She asked if that money is being taken away from something else that has been on the books for a long time. Lambert stated they do not have that defined a list. The 10-year CIP list is only a guideline. Brown was concerned that there be safeguards to prevent developers from not keeping their word on dedications in the future. Hilgeman expressed concern about misleading the neighbors about when the actual screening and widening of the trail will take place. Lambert noted this will go on to the City Council and if approved staff would plant the trees next year, and they may or may not get the trail improved in 1997. Bowman referred to the letter from Jerry Quinn and questioned whether there is anything that would be deemed unsafe. Lambert said they have talked about some changes to be made when they upgrade the trail and believe signage would do a lot toward warning people that there's a fairly steep hill. Staff would make some minor modification and run the trail out a little further to alleviate the problem at the bottom of the hill. Koenig was concerned about who would be responsible for taking care of the landscaping,the City or the Homeowner's Association. Lambert replied the City will buy and plant the trees,but it's up to the homeowners to water and maintain them. Koenig asked if the City would be responsible for replacement if the trees don't survive. Lambert said they have not worked out details of the agreement at this point. MOTION: Bowman moved, seconded by Brown,to approve this proposal per staffs recommendation of the memo dated October 16, 1996. Motion carried 7-0. B. Proposal for Traffic Study at Flying Cloud Fields Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated October 16, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities; and a letter 3 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/5/96 SECTION: Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO. XCCZ DEPARTMENT: Director ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposal to Complete Traffic and Parking Plan for of Parks, Recreation and Flying Cloud Fields Facilities, Bob Lambert k BACKGROUND: The City has used a portion of Flying Cloud Airport for community ballfields since the 1960's. A major expansion and a formal lease arrangement were made between the City and the Metropolitan Airports Commission in 1979. The lease agreement allows the Metropolitan Airports Commission to terminate the lease with a 90-day notice. Due to this provision in the lease and the fact that the Metropolitan Airport Commission had not approved a long-term development plan for the airport, the City had limited the type of development and improvements at Flying Cloud Fields. During the review process for the long-term development of the airport, several alternative plans considered eliminating a significant portion of the Flying Cloud ballfields. The plan that is being proposed and has preliminary approval from the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Council does not impact the Flying Cloud ballfields. The plan for the Flying Cloud ballfields, as originally developed by City staff, depicted eight softball or baseball fields and seven full size soccer fields. The Soccer Association is the main user of these soccer fields and provides in-house soccer programs to age groups as young as five years old. The Soccer Association prefers to keep all of its soccer programs at one location in order to provide convenience to the families who have more than one child involved in the soccer program. In order to accommodate the ever growing soccer program, the Soccer Association has requested the City to subdivide the original seven regulation soccer fields to smaller soccer fields to accommodate the younger participants and growing number of players. During the last two years, the City has striped that complex to accommodate 25 soccer fields in the summer months and 27 in the fall. The City's standard ratio of parking spaces per field is 35 parking spaces for soccer/football fields and 30 cars for baseball/softball fields. This would require 240 cars for the eight softball/baseball fields and 875 cars for the 25 soccer fields. There are only 420 car parking spaces at Flying Cloud Fields and those spaces are measured on gravel parking lots that cannot be striped for parking. This makes the existing parking lots only approximately 80% efficient. The overflow parking occurs on the outfield of the youth softball/baseball fields, which ruins that area of the fields for fall football. The traffic into Flying Cloud Fields occurs during the peak rush hour, and staff is convinced the only reason there hasn't been a serious accident at that intersection is because the traffic is so restricted it has slowed traffic to stop and go for nearly a half mile on each side of the intersection. Departing traffic usually occurs right at dark and has been assisted by a police officer during the majority of the evenings. 1 I Now that the City does have a more firm commitment from the Airports Commission that the City will have a longer term use of this property, City staff believes it is prudent to evaluate the traffic patterns into and out of Flying Cloud ballfields to determine if the City can make any significant improvements to this site in terms of ease of access, as well as safety. Staff also recommends considering paving and striping the parking lots and access roads to improve the use of the existing facilities, and to evaluate whether or not the City can expand the boundaries of the Flying Cloud ballfields to add additional parking. Staff would also recommend investigating the cost to irrigate the entire site in 1997. RECOMMENDATION: Attached to this memorandum is a proposal from Benshoof and Associates, Inc. to complete a traffic and parking study for Flying Cloud ballfields. Staff are requesting the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Council to authorize this study, and for the staff to obtain quotes on irrigating the remaining portion of the site that is not irrigated at this time. The City will always need these ballfields to accommodate youth baseball, softball, soccer and football in Eden Prairie, and believe the sooner additional parking is provided, and ingress and egress are improved, the sooner we will alleviate a lot of frustration from Eden Prairie residents. BL:mdd FlyingCl/Bob96 2 2 Unapproved Minutes Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 would recommend widening to an eight-foot trail next year to be consistent with the public trail system. It was estimated to cost between $3,000 and $3,500 if staff does it. Hilgeman asked if that would be paid for through cash park fees for 1997. Lambert stated it would. Hilgeman commented the total cost for landscaping and widening the trail would be about$5,000. She asked if that money is being taken away from something else that has been on the books for a long time. Lambert stated they do not have that defined a list. The 10-year CIP list is only a guideline. Brown was concerned that there be safeguards to prevent developers from not keeping their word on dedications in the future. Hilgeman expressed concern about misleading the neighbors about when the actual screening and widening of the trail will take place. Lambert noted this will go on to the City Council and if approved staff would plant the trees next year, and they may or may not get the trail improved in 1997. Bowman referred to the letter from Jeny Quinn and questioned whether there is anything that would be deemed unsafe. Lambert said they have talked about some changes to be made when they upgrade the trail and believe signage would do a lot toward warning people that there's a fairly steep hill. Staff would make some minor modification and run the trail out a little further to alleviate the problem at the bottom of the hill. Koenig was concerned about who would be responsible for taking care of the landscaping,the City or the Homeowner's Association. Lambert replied the City will buy and plant the trees,but it's up to the homeowners to water and maintain them. Koenig asked if the City would be responsible for replacement if the trees don't survive. Lambert said they have not worked out details of the agreement at this point. MOTION: Bowman moved, seconded by Brown,to approve this proposal per staffs recommendation of the memo dated October 16, 1996. Motion carried 7-0. B. Proposal for Traffic Study at Flying Cloud Fields Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated October 16, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities; and a letter 3 Unapproved Minutes Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 dates October 15, 1996, from Benshoof and Associates, Inc., Transportation Engineers and Planners. Lambert indicated this is a recommendation to hire Benshoof&Associates to do a traffic and parking study for Flying Cloud ballfields. Over the years Flying Cloud ballfields were developed on a piece meal basis without any long term plan because of the short term 90 days termination notice. After going through the process and seeing the 20-year plan being supported,the recommendation is that it's worth the City's effort and money to make some investment in doing some kind of study at this time. It was also recommended to make a further investment in some more long term improvements such as paving the parking lot and parking area, and irrigating the fields. The first thing should be the traffic study to evaluate what is the best solution to ingress and egress for that site. There is little risk on the City's part at this time to invest in improvements in that facility because it's going to be there for the long term. The traffic study would be money well spent because the City may spend a significant amount of money over the next few years making improvements to the facility that is heavily used. Bowman agreed with the recommendation but questioned whether the City has expertise for doing such a traffic study. Lambert replied that we may have the expertise but we don't have the time. The City engineering Department generally hires RCM or Benshoof to do traffic studies. The City does have engineers that could do it if they had the time, but hey don't have the computer programs and models nor the staff to dedicate to traffic studies. Benshoof is he engineering company that's doing the traffic study for the City required for the MUSA line expansion. Brown asked if other engineering companies were asked to bid on this. Lambert repled no and explained Benshoof has all the numbers in their computer system on the entire southwest part of the City. It would be a lot cheaper for them to do this than have some other company go out and regenerate all those numbers. Jacobson expressed concern about the number of parking spaces needed that were mentioned in the memo. He wants to make sure Benshoof gets accurate information. Lambert replied the statistics in the memo are the standards that have been adopted by the City Council for development of soccer fields, 4 y Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 football fields and base ballfields. The City's standard ratio of parking spaces per field is 35 parking spaces for soccer/football fields and 30 cars for baseball/softball fields. Staff has not given them any numbers yet because they have not hired them yet. Koening asked where the money for the traffic study comes from. Lambert noted it will come out of the general fund. Ken Bomben, 9260 Talus Circle, President of the Eden Prairie Soccer Association, commented they use Flying Cloud Fields in the spring for eight weeks and the fall for eight weeks. They use quarter size and half size fields for their program. The figure of 35 parking spaces per field is for a full size field. His estimate of what they need for the quarter size field is 20 parking spaces per field and for the half size field 25 to 30 parking spaces. They need an approximate total of 510 parking spaces and he explained how they arrived at those figures. The Soccer Association would be very interested in meeting with Benshoof and Associates. The Soccer Association also supports the paving and striping of the parking lots. They would like to keep the program all in one place and if the City can expand the boundaries they support it. The Soccer Association planned last summer to this commission with the recommendation of taking the east side down and putting irrigation in. They were concerned about the size of their program over using the fields. The Soccer Association has been planning for sometime now to find a way to help the City with those fields. Lambert noted they will talk to each of the association president's on uses and their projections as well. If the Soccer Association requires 510 parking spaces and softball requires 240 and baseball 30, the total would be 780 spaces. Kracum asked if they stagger the starting times. Bomben replied they typically run two programs each night and do stagger their starting times in the programs. There is communication between the associations and some years are better than others. MOTION: Kracum moved, seconded by Wilson, to recommend approval of the contract proposed to authorize Benshoof and Associates to come forward with a traffic and parking plan for Flying Cloud Fields as per staff's recommendation of October 16, 1996. Motion carried 6-0-1 with one abstention by Commissioner Brown. 5 S EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/5/96n SECTION: Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO. S-; DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Recreation and Facilities Commission Recommendation Regrading 1997 Cash Park Fees Robert A. Lambert, Director V. Attached to this memorandum is a recommendation from staff regarding proposed cash park fees for 1997, as well as a metropolitan area survey of other communities fees. The Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission reviewed this recommendation at their October 21 meeting and agreed that the staff recommendation was too conservative based on the actual land value of undeveloped property outside of the MUSA line. Commission members recommended unanimously for the Council to increase the residential fees to $1,400/unit. The Commission made this recommendation based on what they believe to be a more realistic cost of undeveloped land at $35,000/acre, rather than $30,000/acre suggested by staff. BL:mdd. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Carl Jullie, City Manager FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilitieseg..► DATE: October 15, 1996 SUBJECT: Proposed Cash Park Fees for 1997 Attached to this memorandum is a survey of park dedication fees from a number of metropolitan communities listing their 1996 fees. The City has the right to take 10%of land in lieu of park fees or to charge the developer 10% of the raw land value for the purpose of developing the park and recreation facilities necessary to serve the residents within the development. Raw land values outside the MUSA line in Eden Prairie have increased by approximately 10% in 1996, according to City assessing staff. The existing fee of$1,200/unit is based on land valued at $30,000/acre. (Low density residential land at 2Y2 units/acre equals $1,200 times 2.5 = $3,000, which is 10% of$30,000/acre.) A 10% increase would be a $120 increase/unit. RECOMMENDATION: City staff believes that the $30,000/acre average cost for undeveloped land in Eden Prairie is extremely conservative. Staff recommends a 10% increase in park dedication fees for residential development from $1,200/unit to $1,320/unit on January 1, 1997. The City's fee for commercial/industrial/office development is $4,500/acre, which is far less than 10%of the fair market value;however, it is one of the higher flat fees that is being charged to date. Staff recommends no increase in the commercial/office/industrial development park fee for 1997. BL:mdd Parkfee/memoBob96 2 Unapproved Minutes Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. None VI. OLD BUSINESS None VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Proposed Cash Park Fees Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated October 15, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities. Lambert indicated each year they are requested to do evaluations of the increased value of the undeveloped land in Eden Prairie. The City assessing staff indicated undeveloped land beyond the MUSA line has increased a minimum of 10%in value from last year to this year. This represents a 10%increase on residential park fees. Staff not only looked at just increase in value of the undeveloped land but also what other cities are charging for cash park fees as well. They recognize Eden Prairie as having one of the most expensive land values in the metro area and, therefore, expect the fees to be at the top or near the top. Lambert reviewed the survey chart attached with the memo. Staff is not recommending any increase in commercial, office, or industrial because their flat fees are one of the highest at this time. There is also no indication of any significant increase in new land values for commercial, office, or industrial compared to the undeveloped residential land outside the MUSA line. If this is approved by the Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council to be adopted on January 1, 1997. Bowman asked how long they have been at this fee schedule. Lambert replied one year. Staff increased it significantly last year. They went from $945 to $1,200 for residential because they had not really kept up with the market. Bowman questioned why the 10% increase should not reflect the commercial property also when Eden Prairie's property values are one of the highest in the metro area. Lambert explained they don't want to price developers out of Eden Prairie. Brown commented the Commission recognized the $30,000 an acre to be very 6 3 Unapproved Minutes Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, October 21, 1996 conservative and believes $40,000 an acre to be more accurate, therefore, he suggested they go with at least $35,000 an acre. He indicated the Commission is in the process to decide that right now. If the Commission wishes to recommend higher,that's their right. As a staff person,he gave a conservative recommendation. Bowman recommended they don't increase at all, that their rates should be a flat percentage of the market value and that they assign a market value each year. This would send the message that the City is not increasing the rates but that property values are going up. The rates stay the same. Brown commented a flat percentage does not include high and low density. He recommended that the City Council consider$35,000 to $40,000 an acre. He noted that the developers are only going to pass the increase onto the buyers. He doesn't believe it's fair to figure on a percentage when they know it's a very conservative value. Hilgeman noted affordable housing is a big issue. They would really be pricing the people out of Eden Prairie, not the developers. This has been a big concern of the community that the developer is going to pass this cost on down to the homeowner. This would be adding about$500 per house. Koening commented she understands Brown's point but she looks at this from an affordable housing point of view that the cost is going to be passed on to the buyer. Bowman noted the Commission should look at this annually and prepare people that this will be moved every year. Motions: Bowman moved, seconded by Brown, to approve this per staff s recommendation with the change that the Commission believes that the average cost for undeveloped land in Eden Prairie to be closer to $35,000 per acre, rather than $30,000 per acre,which will translate into about $1,4000 per unit instead of$1,320 per unit which is a 16.7% increase. Motion carried 7-0. VII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Report of Director of Parks. Recreation and Facilities 1. Set Process and Meeting Dates for Edenbook Conservation Area Trail System Staff referred to the Commission memo dated October 14, 1996, from Robert 7 PARK DEDICATION FEES TOTALS 1996 TYPE OF UNIT OR DEVELOPMENT *CITY Single Family Duplex Townhouse/Quad Multi Family Mobile Home Commercial Industrial per Unit per Unit per Unit per Unit Unit Develop. Develop. (acre) (acre) Plymouth $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $4,050.00 $4,050.00 Eden Prairie 1,200.00 1,200.00. 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 Chanhassen 1,100.00 1,100.00 900.00 900.00 1,100.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 Woodbury 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 800.00 350.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 Cottage 1,000.00 750.00 750.00 750.00 1,000.00 4%of Fair 4%of Fair Grove • Market Val. Market Val. Lakeville 900.00 900.00 900.00 900.00 900.00 5%of Fair 5%of Fair Market Val. Market Val. Maple 845.00 845.00 845.00 845.00 NA 3,600.00 2,775.00 Grove Brooklyn 800.00 800.00 600.00 600.00 NA 2,900.00 1,800.00 Park _ Maplewood 765.00 607.50 607.50 2.7 person x 562.50 9%of Fair 9%of Fair rate x#units Market Val. Market Val. New 750.00 650.00 500.00 350.00 500.00 NA NA Brighton Little 625.00 625.00 NA 312.50 NA 5%of Fair 5% of Fair Canada _ Market Val. Market Val. Blaine 620.00 530.00 460.00 390.00 475.00 1,860.00 1,630.00 Oakdale 600.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 NA 1,800.00 1,800.00 Roseville 500.00 400.00 400.00 350.00 NA 4%of Fair 4%of Fair Market Val. Market Val. Crystal 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 Coon 384.00 326.00 286.00 238.00 291.00 1,152.00 1,152.00 Rapids _ Mounds 100.00 150.00 150.00 NA 3-4 200.00 10%of Fair 10%of Fair View - 4-5 250.00 Market Val. Market Val. Arden Hills 10%of Fair 10%of Fair SEE FORMULA BELOW Market Val. Market Val. Shoreview 10%of Fair 10%of Fair SEE FORMULA BELOW Market Val. Market Val. _ Lino Lakes 200.-1,000. SF of SEE FORMULA BELOW _ Proposed Building Golden Valley UP TO 10% OF RAW LAND VALUE FOR ALL CATERGS. *Rank order based on Single Family Unit rate. 6 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 11/5/96 SECTION: Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities ITEM NO.X esir DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Center Pool Update Recreation and Facilities Robert A. Lambert, Director' BACKGROUND: At the October 15 meeting,the City Council requested staff to provide a more detailed report on the status of the Community Center swimming pool and the issues that are being raised by parents of competitive swimmers regarding air quality in the pool. The air quality in the Community Center pool is another example of"penny wise and pound foolish." In 1979, when the City Council approved the design of the Community Center,the committee that made the recommendation to the City Council decided first, that a referendum would have to be less than three million dollars to be successful, and second, that the Community Center should have an ice arena with seating for 1,200,an L shaped swimming pool that had eight lanes at 25 yards and six lanes at 25 meters with a diving well and seating for 100,three racquetball courts, a fitness center,two meeting rooms, etc. When architects were asked to review this program and budget, four of the five architectural firms told the City that the budget was unrealistic. The City hired the one architectural firm that indicated they could build the building that met the budget and included all of the requests with a few minor modifications. The major reduction from the original plan was to reduce the size of the lobby and to reduce the locker rooms in half from what was originally recommended. As we all know,the facility was built for 2.9 million dollars; however,the City has had to replace all of the exterior walls around the building, add dehumidification to the ice arena, and we have had problems with an air handling system that only met minimum requirements in the swimming pool. The swimming pool air handling system seemed to be "adequate" in the early years of the pool; however, as the number of competitive swimmers on the Foxjet Team and High School Swim Teams have increased,they have experienced problems with air quality. The first serious concerns were raised four to five years ago, and in 1993, the City contracted with LWPB to study the HVAC system and disinfectant system for the swimming pool. The Work Statement in the Request for Proposal was as follows: 1. Perform a technical analysis of the existing HVAC system for the natatorium and disinfectant system for the natatorium. A. Technical analyses of the HVAC system to include measuring the amount of air turnover in the natatorium compared to the desired amount (State Code and/or desired industry standard). B. Determine what improvements to the existing HVAC system would be required to maintain humidity between 40 and 45 percent in the natatorium. C. Evaluate the optimum condition for the balance of air between the natatorium and other portions of the Community Center and how to reach that condition. 1 D. Evaluate the disinfectant system to determine what improvements to the system or the operating policies would be required to maintain a combined chlorine level of.5 parts per million or below on a regular basis. 2. Provide cost estimates for any improvements necessary to the HVAC system and for any improvements necessary for the disinfectant system. 3. Submit a fmal report and be prepared to discuss the report with members of the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their regular meeting, as well as at the City Council at their regular meeting. 4. The final report must provide information on the existing conditions, the problems, the proposed changes, and the reasons why the changes will correct the problem. The fmal report regarding recommendations for the HVAC system and disinfectant system should also include other considerations important to making a final decision such as an estimated increase in the annual operating costs, any methods of improvements that should be considered that would reduce long term operating costs(heat reclaim systems, etc.). 5. If a decision is made to proceed with detailed plans, what would the fees be for a second phase that would include preparation of detailed plans, specifications, and bidding documents? If a decision is made to proceed with construction, what would the fees be for the third phase of services that would include bidding, contract administration, and on site observation of the work as it progresses? Attached to this memo is a June 3, 1993-report from Bob Lambert to the Mayor and City Council and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission regarding the results of the HVAC system and disinfectant system study. The cost for the recommended options ranged from $136,000 to $287,000, and would increase the operating costs a minimum of$3,685 per year to a maximum of$36,730 per year. No money had been budgeted for any of these proposed improvements. The report indicated that the Community Center did meet all state code requirements regarding air handling and pool disinfectant systems;however, it also pointed out the HVAC system was poorly designed and did not meet the current engineer"standards" regarding air change per hour, and that there may be a more effective disinfectant system that would cause less problems with high chlorine content in the air. The engineer believed that the most important changes the City could make to affect any breathing problems would be to revise the existing duct work to eliminate the short circuiting of air for supply to return and replace the existing motors in the system with high energy efficient motors. This option would increase the cool air change to 4.74 air changes per hour, which would exceed the minimum standard if a glass wall were constructed between the spectator space and swimming pool "although the wall would then technically allow the pool to meet a recommended standard,it would not increase the air changes of 4.7 per hour in the pool" and therefore, it is questioned by staff. The problems are not caused by spectators,but by large numbers of swimmers during practice sessions. Recognizing that there was not any money budgeted for any of the options, staff asked the Council to consider making the "most important changes"recommended by the engineer and then to decide on whether or not the wall was needed in the future, and to wait until some of the other alternative systems such as Ozone had a better track record before making a recommendation to invest in a change to the disinfectant system. 2 The changes to the air handling system seemed to address the problems for a couple of years, however, in the fall of 1996 City staff received numerous complaints from the High School Girls Swim Team regarding breathing problems. CONSIDERATIONS: While the existing air handling system may meet "minimum code standards"it obviously it is not sufficient to provide the amount of fresh air needed for the large competitive swim teams that are using the swimming pool at this time. Staff believe the two major improvements required to accommodate the problems that are experienced by competitive swimmers would be to provide more fresh air in the pool and to change the disinfectant system to an Ozone system. A swimming pool consultant capable of analyzing the entire swimming pool operation from pool design, to mechanical system design and maintenance practices may suggest improvements beyond those two major considerations. The swimming pool accommodates all uses other than competitive swimmers without any complaints from users. City staff is following all State Health Department operating recommendations that are available with the existing system to make that pool as safe as possible; however, if the City is unable to maintain a healthy atmosphere for competitive swimmers, both the high school coaches and the Foxjets coaches should take immediate action to move their swim practices to the Oak Point pool. Although, the Oak Point pool was not designed to accommodate swim meets, etc., it is a 25 yard, six lane pool that could accommodate swim team practices until any recommended changes are made at the Community Center. Staff recognizes that the six lane pool could not accommodate the large numbers of swimmers on the High School Girls Team or the Foxjets Swim Team without major changes in how they use the pool, however, safety should be the first consideration. If the recommended changes to the Community Center pool are in an amount that cannot be funded by the City and perhaps the School District without a referendum,the City should consider not allowing competitive swimming in that pool until it is considered a safe atmosphere for that use by the coaches and swimmers. RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the Council authorize staff to meet with the School District staff to determine if they are willing to jointly develop a Request for Proposal from pool consultants to review the air quality issues at the swimming pool to ensure that both the School District staff and City staff are satisfied with the questions being asked and with the consultant giving the answers to what should be done to address these issues. The pool consultant should be requested to provide a report that explains what is causing the problem, what options are available for solving the problem, and the estimated cost for the options. The 1993 report provides a great deal of information and should assist the pool consultant in an analysis. Once the staff have the solutions and the cost estimates, the City and the School District should discuss all funding options available and then decide how recommended improvements can be funded. BL:mdd 3