The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council - 08/06/1996 AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/ARTS COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1996 6:30 P.M. CITY CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr.,Nancy Tyra-Lukens COUNCIL STAFF: Carl Jullie, City Manager; Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities COMMISSION MEMBERS: Deb Campbell Potter, Chairperson; Barbara Nordby, Vice Chairperson; Ann Birt, Rachel Hutter, Em Stark, David Steppat COMMISSION STAFF: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTIONS III. PRESENTATION OF 1995-1998 STRATEGIC PLAN A. Role.Responsibilities,Mission and Vision-Deb Campbell Potter(3 minutes) 1. Arts Commission's Role 2. Arts Commission's Responsibilities 3. Arts Commission's Mission 4. Eden Prairie Arts Vision 2000 B. Strategic Goal- Deb Campbell Potter(3 minutes) 1. Review 1996 Work Plan C. Recap on Activities and Accomplishments - Em Stark & Barb Nordby17 minutes) 1. Commission Brochure 2. Staring Lake Concert Series 3. Performing Arts Ensemble 4. DiverseCity on the Prairie/Taste on the Prairie Program 5. Art in City Center 6. Young Audience Program 7. Arts Center avemmimmingemExiiiiik-. Proposed Actual Completion Date Cost,Funding Source and Other Comments Description of Project/Task Goal Individual(s) Completion Assigned Date 1. Ensure meetings are effective and productive. Goal#1 -Create an efficient organizational Deb Campbell January 1995 September 1995 a. restructure agenda structure and process by which to conduct the Arts Potter b. Designate specific meetings for specific Commission business. Barb Nordby topics c. Schedule additional"workshops' on separate day or evening d. Develop and update annual plan 2. Develop structure for decision making process. March 1996 November 1995 a. Contact facilitator for ongoing feedback b. Explore quarterly sessions for purpose of decision process/evaluations c. If yes to b),schedule sessions d. Implement sessions 3. Develop strong subcommittee/task force Sept 1996 Ongoing Task force groups are formed as needed for structure. Commission initiatives. a. determine/identify groups needed • Performing Arts Ensemble b. identify participants • SLCS Subcommittee c. Initiate group(s) • Art-in-City Center Subcommittee d. Develop a communication methodology with • Arts Festival Subcommittee commission • Budget Subcommittee e. establish guidelines and parameters 4. Determine how to establish effective Ongoing • This has been established with the Staring Arts communication flow with other organizations and Board,and other organizations such as the Lioness projects. Club. a. Invite guests to exchange information b. Identify groups and send letter/brochure to solicit exchanges 5. Evaluate need for additional staff support 1997/98 . „. MOERMWggg,nnngi,ffiaOAMNgib.MigainiRMINNS.BMB:M.MNRMPIMSVZNMftei. i'AMVIRaWASMP,,,,,,Li'4g.,,r-aSEEP'Wtaffgt.PSIPO*Kteg!;g-.:-TP,Agiiir0.::"M'.gdniggfi::FegnnPigragi MgEgPREVIMEMiWRgtgMRglg:W4:N.NOMgPiealMgigMEVPO4g?96StltategteiiPigttitMttittiti"ItAgeiltentXr4€12Mnl"0"i"W3-W:MS-AVMO:"IMAWO-gggPba,MOWgafiggEW;MEgggfO Proposed Actual Completion Date Cost,Funding Source and Other Comments Description of Project/Task Goal Individual(s) 1 Completion Assigned Date 1. Invite Eden Prairie Arts Board to name a liaison Goal#2-Develop cooperative relationships with Em Stark May 1996 January 1996 • Basil Wissner is the representative for the Staring to attend Arts Commission meetings,especially if other arts related organizations. Arts Board and Deb Campbell Potter is the Arts Center is on meeting agenda. Commission representative. 2. Extend similar invitation to Community May 1996 Incomplete Education Department. 3. Send Commission meeting minutes that relate to May 1996 January 1995 Arts Center Board to Arts Board Liaison. . 4. Design,produce,and circulate a letter to any Nov 1996 other local arts organizations,commissions, and/or centers;this letter would seek a communications network with these other agencies. 5. Design,promote,sponsor,and host a regional Nov 1997 workshop on the theme"Communicating the Arts." Invite representatives of all arts organizations responding to#4. 6. Come up with a way to get a City Council Nov 1996 In Progress member to attend at least one Arts Commission meeting per quarter;this may involve changing our meeting day or time periodically. ........ r r. o. ..:...... .. ...r..:...:...:..:... ... .......r....... ..... ...r....r...:.:... .:.:::.::::::.�...... ::::................. r.........:::.........:..::::r...�::.:.�:?.:::.+.•:::::./.•:rlr:.:.-:::.,. , ..:...:.r. .................:.....:r:................. .....rv..r.........:. : ..ru.......:.:./.......:....:. .....:.... ..1....r..r.:......./........:.......::....::v..:.�:::::::::::::::::::::::rv::;rv:+: r.: :!! ...:.:.......:..:..:...rr....................:r..r.......J... Jr....... ..r....r...:...........n.........r.................r...::..:..:..0 ...:.r.... .. ....... : ............... r ... .../..:...rr :./.....: r..l.:..... .r:....:......................{........ .f.r........:...... ...... ......................... ....:........:...... ../.rr::.::�:::........:r::::::::.�::::....... ....f.r::::•:?.:ry.?.v:.�r••., l:.f:f..... r.......n............................ ......r.....: .r{....... ......... .r .: ... .. ..... ... .1..... ... :.:............... :../../......................................r/....r. :../.::.::n�::lv::r:Ufii}:I i%v;9:;yii:;..f..r.. ...�+f�/fii.. .r:...:..............:...:.r..r......................................:....: .. ..... .. ...fr.:..r !.. �y ...w... ...... .... .. ....... .�;... rr.::��/r.r. ....:...:.r.r.......r.............:.r........:.:.:..:...:......f/rrf.. ......./.:.:..........:.........r........r...r....... : ,�/y. .....n.. ............../.........l.r.... ..... r ...rvr.�::ry:.�.�............ r::::vr..:r::!•::•::•::::::;r.;::::r:i::iF?•:::. n.....:•: r..../........::.rr....r. ::..:..:....rf.....::..r.::fv.........:............r..��..�J,!/.:f v/.•r:. .. : .Y� .�� v.� ��.«•�. � .��.... ../:.....:... ................................................................ :. :...: :.......r........:..............:...........:....... r �................. ... �.................... ..............F.::r::::::::::.�:::.�:::.:v:;v:::::::v::::;•:.:�:•::::::•.::::::::::::::v:::v::v::v:.�:::.�:.�:::::.w::::.�::.�::::v.�::::.�:-::v:::r.. ......r.: Proposed Actual Completion Date Cost,Funding Source and Other Comments Description of Project/Task Goal Individual(s) Completion Assigned Date 1. Identify with City staff what is currently being Goal#3-Be the Information Center to identify Needs to be May 1996 • Goal temporarily on hold until the status of the done and how we can expand or improve the funding needs,funding sources,and funding reassigned due • Staring Arts Board is communicated. existing program. opportunities in the arts. to commissioner 2. Brainstorm with staff and Arts Commission for resignation. May 1996 other resources in Eden Prairie. 3. Establish a"break-even"budget on booked Ongoing performances. 4. Research other available resources 5. Receive Council approval from recommendations. 6. Act on contacting solicitations. 7. Establish a grant process. MPSOMPtroix.4001.V7tinegr/WS.Inr)- 4",WO.XenkePV inoMMENIgiNNENEMmAimaid0:::nalgraglaningiggai0407..yoikkura:.:: Proposed Actual Completion Date Cost,Funding Source and Other Comments Description of Project/Task Goal Individual(s) Completion Assigned Date 1. Identify arts needs of Eden Prairie residents. Goal#4-Determine the arts needs of Eden Prairie Beth Beutell Sept 1996 Survey redesigned June 1996 Compile current work. Compilation to be completed a. Create a groundswell of support from Eden residents,and ensure the development and offerings Dave Steppat September 1996. Prairie residents. of programs and facilities to meet these needs. 2. Establish an understanding of needs among"key" Jan 1997 Identify key organizations. organizations. a. Create strong cooperation and endorsement of actions. 3. Examine the feasibility of public/private Jan 1997 Secure more funding partnerships for support of the arts. a. Additional participation and funding from private sources. 4. Create an awareness of Eden Prairie arts 1998 Promotion and participation across area. programs throughout the area arts community. a. Strong interest from artists wanting to participate. 5. Determine arts facility needs for Eden Prairie June 1997 Projections of needs for 2000 and 20005. residents. a. An arts facility plan for 5 and 10 years. 6. Continue development of an Eden Prairie"Arts June 1997 Formal program to recruit and retain. Volunteer"program. a. Ensure an ample supply of volunteers for events. .... :. f...... : : r. » Y ...r : .....:. .. ..f. ..J•y:rr,.vY::::: +r. + .»:.:J.. :"rf:-is+t-'-v+.'+F'i ;;:f"r.i'++Y+1J'.r Ji'r 'f r'rry:'•ir-is-iY':-r : :. .... .! ..fJ�ll. i F.r .. .. r. : .J:f....fi.w:. J/:r.. /•. ...r...:.:r+J, ::.rr r r..Fl::.. .JJ::r•J...r....+..::.:.i...r........ J1 r... : : : .:..:.:.. /,J. .rr....:..J.. r.: F .. ..J..... r:. .r.F... .. ..:1 ..: .:�: rFf+ f .l ........:.r.:...r.f,.....r........r.:.+..:...:..r.r.............:.....................r.r...f..r r��..+.!./:......r../..J:1r'.,,.r.:ff!././.r..r..:..J./r..:r.rJ.r f.J 1:...J.:..1�..::.Jr J rr i f.r:...,..,:+..+�r.:..r:{f/:........r r:..Y.r t;./.../.:r.:..J....J.r::Jf1...r.......r rf.�:f.:.r..r.!�.+l.ff+i......:...rr/..f.fJ f.n:r:../l....r.r....r.,....+......1........:i..,.:..f:....I.f..r.:r.F./.:r fr..F.:a....r...r.....rrr.i.r!::�.�. :...././�./......+......:.�.F]r..�.....r.....:..r..i r..F:.:r»....r.......»...........::.................::•,,..,:........y.:.(:J r»:`...1.r........++r......i..i...:.:....:../..........�...r1i..r:...�.:...:r..:».1...1:.r..:r::....:...�'...r.J.:...././.J..:....r.F rf..�...:'.++r...r.:..J/....r...,.:.::J..J..J..J.r��.�...>.��r�J}....�'.:.�.r..F J1 ram J�:��..1f..F�`r+�....r,r_..Ft.d..+..+r........F.l..!r��J /r�+.rram..� „e,f"{r�+../ �`� �r F . . :r .: : :r J 1.. : : » . r» F ... .:1 M: : r :W • �: ! ! 0. . � i1G 4VM . �. F �J . " .r.r./rJ. : .1 .rr-.:>•..f�.r..>r:.»fr.i+Y.:».f:trr:?r-FJ:.rJ++Fr:.r:++->f.:.•.'r..�F f::•�'1rJ f.F/r �r:-.:rF-frrYI�J-..fr:•I..Yrr..�f�lr.::�-,:{+:r.;.• .t-..i::.::+irrr.•.-..r.:J.:.-:.:i:.�JFH .: ?i:?J.••..�/::-:.:-.:.???..+.:;...: i:•:-::.:r.v..Fi1 .4:�:1:ir.+Y:•.:. .::..:•...::.: rJ;.'.•.r.-.?.:.r•: . : :r:.i'/r..f:/.....'•.:1 '.. �+f..i.. ..?.-.:. Proposed Actual Completion Date Cost,Funding Source and Other Comments �. Description ofProject/Task Goal Individuals) Completion Assigned Date 1. Determine/recommend City involvement with Goal#5-Establish and monitor utilization Deb Campbell • All these tasks are on hold until the City,if it so arts proposals. requirements to be met by all arts facilities that are Potter chooses, forms a partnership with a private arts City funded. group. This goal was established to assist in 2. Participate in alternate site selection. defining structure for that relationship. 3. Develop evaluation criteria. a. Create wide-range,general criteria list ! Jan 1996 September 1995 • Completed 3.a. b. Refine to correspond to site/proposal needs • This has been prepared and would form the c. Present to commission foundation of the completion of the other related d. Revise and present to Council(incorporate tasks under this goal outside resource) e. Finalize and forward to Arts Board .::::......,:....................:. ... .•:,.....v.....:.,.....:• ......�..:...:: ...:»::»:::•r.;•:::::.::... r F ...:r: r- r�r:•J-,. J::.:»:•:r•:::::.�::::-::.... .:rr f.:�.::.:,..: . .... ........... :. ......,.+...r....+....... :........... ..: :..........r..:..,.... ...:r J f Fn. : ! FFF{ff.fff r :f:{ r:f.{ .. ............ .. + J//.r....: .........:r. ........ :.......... ............�...v.......:..v...........r.. ..... .........l.......... {{{f...:......r.F.: � ,.fr. .f. f {.. :./. f rF: J: .vl.... ....................:....,.......... !.......f.. ..+. +../.....».J.+....+ J..... , ..ri r....,...... .. �' , .:........: ri {f.....l..d.. '{� I.fv r .. .................... .: . +.....+....:..JJ..J..�,..:. ..r..:...r.....,:+..::::•: fF..::i.,:,,n: +r ...,/./...:>>-:,: � f`f { t�:r f.f: f ... .... ........r. :........r. ..{.1..,.... r:+................Wr..:...+..lJ r..» r .:. .. ..:+..... :: r. , :.✓fn�r�.v :J.:. r ��..f {/.•: f r r:f,J +. ... ..»......... ... ....r. .:.,......... ...r.......+..... .v.r.+....:...... .. » +./ r.f r ....J. .:.., .+. .... r r{n.�. f....r,rr .J ... ..+.. .. .............:....r.+..r.n..i........... ...........+...:... f....r..r:,/.r,r... ..:. ...r ....w.. ... .+...+...r.r.......+. +.�.r: ! { ::/ .f.,f :.:/-;,::-r J�•;:•:i+.!••:�::.................r......r...............r............................ ....+..+.r............f........:..+.....r..,.... +r.r...... ....+r. .. .. : .. .+..::::•.�::...r.. :-:::' .F{r.•--...1:,: r;l.. '-/r/.......r..:.ff- .r..r., . .... .................... ...................,.......r.,.......::..+......... ......r...r.............r.rl......:.r ...... .. 1... .. .. .,...:...J........ /{r� J / f{FF�., ./+. ./:{�... ..}.. {�{:r. ....... ................ .. .... .. ..... ,.....+. .r/.J.,... �. � .. ... .: � .. � .. , {�r.l.:�:.!. r� �r��/.,. •:r'.. �.. ...J f//.. vJ� ... .......+... ......r....:..........+i......:l...r{.......... � �. .h .��......::::•::..:�:::/ //.•..a.,-:-: :F/ /.:�,r.!...:,. Jf 1. {�::+{:r�r.:r: :•r::^:.:''::.:;::•:::.'•:-r::i'r.:::r�...... %:;y:::5;'t::£:;•.{+. .......................................................................r..............,.............................................. .+......r../... .. ..J.J � .��W �� t ..�il� .«RTv.�R� �[i .. : J r ......... .. .. ... ..:... �:� � .... .....r................. ........................ ...........................J.,.....rrl.. .{: ..JJ..�.f.�...... .{,{�. ./r.:�..:....r.r.............�::. ..{... r.fr...:..::::•. .... .................:�:.....:.....;:......... :•:....:...................{.....;r..........;...n::•:::::::.:r.::..::::::....r........ ....r.;.`..........,..�.� .................... ........ .. ..............:. y. .�. .v.... L.•• .. .. , FJs 1�'/..+.n .. .... - .. .. .. r Proposed Actual Completion Date Cost,Funding Source and Other Comments Desc iption of Project/Task Goal Individual(s) Completion Assigned Date 1. Create and de ign Arts Commission Goal#6-Undertake creative publicity and Barb Nordby Dec 31, 1995 Dec 19, 1995 brochures/pu.lication. promotional efforts which enhance the visibility and Rachel Hutter a.. Meet wit i task force to design brochure awareness of the arts in Eden Prairie. b. Collabo •to with City personnel in designing brochure c. Present brochure to Arts Commission for final approval d. Produce brochure e. Create distribution plan 2. Create public relations program package. April 1996 December 1995 a. Establish task force b. Create Arts in Eden Prairie logo,establish In Progress theme/slcgan c. Promote arts T-shirt contest In Progress 3. Target areas in which to promote the arts in Eden Fall 1996 Prairie. a. Explore i lea of regular column in periodicals such as Community News and Eden Prarie News b. Set up arts information area at community events 4. Publish an Eden Prairie Directory of the Arts: 1997/98 Potter/Laurie9 July 30, 1996 Joint City Council/Arts Commission Agenda August 6, 1996 IV. SPECIAL INITIATIVES -Rachel Hutter(7 minutes) A. Arts Festival B. Communication with Arts Board C. Poetry Contest D. Review/Research of Other Arts Opportunities (i.e.. ethnic dance) E. Theatre Subcommittee F. Park-in-Movies at Staring Lake Park V. Identification of Issues Requiring City Council Input - (10 minutes) A. Council/Commission Communication- Deb Campbell Potter 1. Attendance at Arts Commission Meetings by a Councilmember Semi- annually 2. Inter Commission Communication(written or verbal) B. Future of a Center for the Arts in Eden Prairie C. 1997 Proposed Budget- Dave Steppat 1. 1997 Service Budget D. Arts Commission Logo-Barb Nordby VI. CITY COUNCIL FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION VII. OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Aug6ag/Lauire96 THE ARTS COMMISSION'S ROLE • Advise the Eden Prairie City Council on matters pertaining to activities, programs and facilities of artistic significance to the City of Eden Prairie. • Implement programs of artistic significance. THE ARTS COMMISSION'S RESPONSIBILTIES • Function as an agent to receive gifts and donations to the City Council for artistic purposes according to policy. • Advise the City Council on matters pertaining to artistic affairs. • Recommend areas and/or facilities that the City might include in the City's park program that have artistic significance. • Advise the City Council on needed expansion and improvements in artistic programs in the community. • Implement programs necessary to accomplish its goals. THE ARTS COMMISSION'S MISSION Because arts are essential to the quality of life in Eden Prairie, the Arts Commission exists to enrich the City's arts culture: • By nurturing the diverse expression of the arts throughout the community. • By increasing the accessibility and affordability of the arts for every household. • By providing educational and participative opportunities which build understanding and awareness of the arts. • By harmoniously coordinating arts functions and activities to serve the needs of all residents of Eden Prairie; and • By promoting collaboration among arts organizations. EDEN PRAIRIE ARTS VISION 2000 By the year 2000, we envision that Eden Prairie will be widely known for its commitment to the arts. There is significant evidence to demonstrate how important the arts are to Eden Prairie residents. • The Staring Lake Concert Series continues to draw ever larger crowds, pressuring the schedule to continually expand. • The Arts Center has undergone its third expansion as a premier arts education and exhibit facility. • A 800 seat auditorium has been constructed to offer year-round music and theatrical offerings. • The Arts Commission orchestrates spectacularly creative public relations efforts promoting the arts in Eden Prairie, including huge street banners, an arts directory, arts publications, T-shirts, and arts buses/trolleys for efficient access to arts events. • Annually, Eden Prairie celebrates a week-long arts appreciation event. There is a wide variety of arts offerings, and residents and visitors seek out the arts happenings of most interest to them. • Every summer, Eden Prairie hosts a major arts festival arrayed around the shore of Staring Lake. Many local and national artists compete to exhibit at the festival, which draws visitors from throughout the country. • Eden Prairie has become a magnet for coffee houses, book stores, and ethnic eateries providing literary discussions, readings, acoustical musicians and vocalists, and varied artists who offer unique expression in an intimate environment. And in the Year 2000, the arts flourish in Eden Prairie. Description of Project/Task Goal Individual(s) tl(s) el(s) Assigned •id yd // >�:..,45,0 1. Ensure meetings are effective and productive. Goal#1 -Create an efficient organizational Deb Campbell by a. restructure agenda structure and process by which to conduct the Arts Potter Minattigtairtag>.•>:» b. Designate specific meetings for specific Commission business. Barb Nordby •::; <•,<;:;:>;:s;!;::.; ::;:::;;.;::;::;::; : topics .:.::.:::..... c. Schedule additional"workshops'.on separate day or evening 827 Arts d. Develop and update annual plan 834 Staring Lake Cone, 2. Develop structure for decision making process. a. Contact facilitator for ongoing feedback 835 Summer Theatre b. Explore quarterly sessions for purpose of :�•::;;.;<<?;?:-::tr f + ;�»ff decision process/evaluations �;•✓%,,:, ' c. If yes to b schedule sessions 3563 REVENUE d. Implement sessions 3861 Other Contributio 3. Develop strong subcommittee/task force structure. Eden Prairie Lioness C a. determine/identify groups needed b. identify participants `'TOT '> --''+� c. Initiate group(s) d. Develop a communication methodology with 80 -Arts- $32,800 pro] commission e. establish guidelines and parameters • Staring Lake Coi 4. Determine how to establish effective • Contractual Sew communication flow with other organizations and projects. " I Cooperate a. Invite guests to exchange information b. Identify groups and send letter/brochure to - Special A solicit exchanges Days Fes.. - New Arts 5. Evaluate need for additional staff support etc. • Staring Lake Cot • Staring Lake Col • ArtSum/Budget AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/ARTS COMMISSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1996 6:30 P.M. CITY CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr.,Nancy Tyra-Lukens COUNCIL STAFF: Carl Jullie, City Manager; Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities COMMISSION MEMBERS: Deb Campbell Potter, Chairperson; Barbara Nordby, Vice Chairperson; Ann Birt, Rachel Huffer, Em Stark, David Steppat COMMISSION STAFF: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. INTRODUCTIONS III. PRESENTATION OF 1995-1998 STRATEGIC PLAN A. Role.Responsibilities. Mission and Vision - Deb Campbell Potter (3 minutes) 1. Arts Commission's Role 2. Arts Commission's Responsibilities 3. Arts Commission's Mission 4. Eden Prairie Arts Vision 2000 B. Strategic Goal - Deb Campbell Potter(3 minutes) 1. Review 1996 Work Plan C. Recap on Activities and Accomplishments - Em Stark& Barb Nordby (7 minutes) 1. Commission Brochure 2. Staring Lake Concert Series 3. Performing Arts Ensemble 4. DiverseCity on the Prairie/Taste on the Prairie Program 5. Art in City Center 6. Young Audience Program 7. Arts Center Joint City Council/Arts Commission Agenda August 6, 1996 IV. SPECIAL I ITIATIVES -Rachel Hutter(7 minutes) A. Arts Festival B. Communication with Arts Board C. Poetry Contest D. Review/Research of Other Arts Oppornities (i.e.. ethnic dance) E. Theatre Subcommittee F. Park-in-Movies at Staring Lake Park V. Identification of Issues Requiring City Council Input-(10 minutes) A. Council/Commission Communication- Deb Campbell Potter 1. Attendance at Arts Commission Meetings by a Councilmember Semi- annually 2. Inter Commission Communication(written or verbal) B. Future of a Center for the Arts in Eden Prairie C. 1997 Proposed Budget- Dave Steppat 1. 1997 Service Budget D. Arts Commission Logo - Barb Nordby VI. CITY COUNCIL FEEDBACK AND DIRECTION VII. OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Aug6ag/Lauire96 THE ARTS COMMISSION'S ROLE • Advise the Eden Prairie City Council on matters pertaining to activities, programs and facilities of artistic significance to the City of Eden Prairie. • Implement programs of artistic significance. THE ARTS COMMISSION'S RESPONSIBILTIES • Function as an agent to receive gifts and donations to the City Council for artistic purposes according to policy. • Advise the City Council on matters pertaining to artistic affairs. • Recommend areas and/or facilities that the City might include in the City's park program that have artistic significance. • Advise the City Council on needed expansion and improvements in artistic programs in the community. • Implement programs necessary to accomplish its goals. THE ARTS COMMISSION'S MISSION Because arts are essential to the quality of life in Eden Prairie, the Arts Commission exists to enrich the City's arts culture: • By nurturing the diverse expression of the arts throughout the community. • By increasing the accessibility and affordability of the arts for every household. • By providing educational and participative opportunities which build understanding and awareness of the arts. • By harmoniously coordinating arts functions and activities to serve the needs of all residents of Eden Prairie; and • By promoting collaboration among arts organizations. EDEN PRAIRIE ARTS VISION 2000 By the year 2000, we envision that Eden Prairie will be widely known for its commitment to the arts. There is significant evidence to demonstrate how important the arts are to Eden Prairie residents. • The Staring Lake Concert Series continues to draw ever larger crowds, pressuring the schedule to continually expand. • The Arts Center has undergone its third expansion as a premier arts education and exhibit facility. • A 800 seat auditorium has been constructed to offer year-round music and theatrical offerings. • The Arts Commission orchestrates spectacularly creative public relations efforts promoting the arts in Eden Prairie, including huge street banners, an arts directory, arts publications, T-shirts, and arts buses/trolleys for efficient access to arts events. • Annually, Eden Prairie celebrates a week-long arts appreciation event. There is a wide variety of arts offerings, and residents and visitors seek out the arts happenings of most interest to them. • Every summer, Eden Prairie hosts a major arts festival arrayed around the shore of Staring Lake. Many local and national artists compete to exhibit at the festival, which draws visitors from throughout the country. • Eden Prairie has become a magnet for coffee houses, book stores, and ethnic eateries providing literary discussions, readings, acoustical musicians and vocalists, and varied artists who offer unique expression in an intimate environment. And in the Year 2000, the arts flourish in Eden Prairie. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 1997 PROPOSED BUDGET SUMMARY DIVISION 80: ARTS f%%:! /':/%�;.: ::.%' fif:r r'J'1: :'1 f/'rr%f: 'r%. :S./. ,�%'f 1.'/.'r "'/.:• riY>i ^'f.'f%:'r'r T/% J f f.' r f. i!. .F:4:1if 1'Jrr1.•>:'> .................:;j4t/•: � i r'l:r.{ Jf /,>'r.ry.J»..: J JJ 1.:.: //%'Ji' f•%. r>%;:.. f ,ir: _ .f:./. J r.1. f :JJ. J 5 t.n.. /. ,:3r J.,:V. r>. ,/.. .1. J,.,.J .1. : ,:1%J..» ,!. •.�1•,s::::J....cs::{. /.:::...»+:r sr., ..tc,:.:%.>�;-::r.•:-:. -.C. ..1:f..::..:....::........5: ..,.r,/./•f. .. 4. ... :../I,,t:v/,r.r..9t.:/•:...... ..3,.• ..:....i•:...,.::.,.:r, .../..:..,:.::: :.:a.;:..: ... i...:.G. ..�..1.... ,{:.5:.{,7•.. :%, ,r 3�fir ./�:.J./.. !, . .f /. %. ,f a:JiS1; :..1-f.-f:.f :r-r:•-:J:•F->.. :+"rf'-�••.:•:::.:::,r:,�::-.:.:f::::.::.. ..,.:. :....,..:.... .... J.,,.: /•,../. . ... :: :. f..: :,. ,r .. /: r...;;!.:: .J:1>::n::.5".i!... 1, .. >: ...f:r....JJf/.,J.r/, ./,...,.�... 1J,...+... r r+J.. J i.. , .../ :, .J. .. r..f.,. ,,. ..r: /f�: rl .. ... . ,r- . •:...r....... ......f.:...f ...., ..r.n././F..F.r. ....:. :...... r.,.,. ., ..:. ../..f :., r ...i. .. .Jr,rJ,.,..J.. .IJ... 1.r rf :J.: :.:J.1. r..r:.:,....1..:.rar: / .....,..:..r r /.. ? :./, r / f , ./ .l , .!f.1•. .r. f ... ..,.: ........:.......1•rf•?fff..J...:r::::r::r-:,:�-f,f/.-f.';!;F::•'•.;:f-::-:r::!...:... ,.l.vf: :•: .. ,......:.., r.,....................r........:.1......,.. .1 J.. .,... .:. .% f..r. ,.... .... ..J.,..: %..l...rl.1/r'..J...../..r, /.. !•-I f•:.........,.............%.....f. ..,....:..,...........................f,..,r..../:.n. ... .,.J......1+.//.i:.......J... .1 r:... r..r:J.... .r../.,..........: •:r. f l .5. . . ...... .......:.. ..:..:r.rr ......r.+..:.....:.............,..:.....:....,...... ..... .. .,:... .......:.,................././f/............... :,/.r.J::.vrr:::::::r:�/.. :.:Sf�` :.J. %:/.. :%f••:....:..:.»..:. ....r a....... 1 f.f/..................:..:..:...:..............:..,,.r..,..: r.»..,..J .....r..... .....,..,..1.........:......,....::�•:J.: .. .... �•:%;:%f :f: f•!••, r, ce: ,. .... .:.. /.rv... ....... .. ... .... ...... r... ..r...... .. ......,...,r. ..1. ::J. : .;•.' ::+{.:s5r:!-::•ir:i:-:•:•iii,:.;::::i:::ji :. .....r..... ....v...%.J..... ....:. .......:.:..,. ...../..�....o...r..,.:./.. % r.......r. ....... .. .r. :....:........ .........,r.. : :.,r./...,.. ..... ........ f>!- •::"::>•::::.c:::':i}> ::'. (..�.a�.•.�:�.c...::.;� �� .�.( #l�..f. :,,.:J r.:J•».•:-.: ��..:e!:�.,:•.�:::..:�..:,'+{� ,A�:Y�{� :....:�:•f.:.:�:� �....J...... ..r:��.:.:.t�i3Yf!�i":fs:;; �..��..�•.••� .......:...... .. .. ...........:....... +�................. ...r..:..:.r /..........:,.... ........r....r..r......................r..r..:... /. nl..: r1�.�.-.-"•..-':.�1.1!-�lJ►:: r ...»............ ....v.... : .. :. .:.:::F;mi:..... :::•.:.:. .:.•-, . .::iiS ... ' : ., .....1.....:......../..::..:M.:r r,u:...l.:r....r..... r.../.. ..vv...:....... .. ..fi:.. ..... .. v.......... ..........:............:..... ...:...»..r. ..,..:. .. ... r , :.. r v. ,.. /..J»..... ...N. �Y ..J.... .:v.......... ..r............::r.:r...: . . . r f:•n;+- �1 .J..r. ry.Sei> .�y J:{.» ..:..n:::;!,.%v%•, ..... %n; :..».::;:::::Lx:;rv:::43;•i:Jiii>y;+.:.iY:S%>;{+ii:S•iJ yy» .:. - � >i 'r.�.. - :ii ::::• .......:..:.:....r..:.,r::r.........::..::::v.../............ ..., ... .:....v...f'�r... '..:: ..:f.::vF•>�:.:v.: �ii; ::.:r1�>5Y->'? .r,!?7!bF'Jr n>f.Y'i-.: ..�:::i.Sy:;e. :...'•r::rtr•:•:.:,•:,.::.-,.:%-::;;:;,:F:-�: :.:.::i....... r:.rr. ->rr.. ..:. :J-.�.1:.:%•r:: �(� -r• ..r..r..J.fi..f..1....,..J, ..:...r.r.:./.....J.:.r..F.r./..1.......J........:.:...:....:.. ..........:.. .:..::.».:..:.. .%.%..:. .. ..:r,y;:: B�d.: '11!F..F.;..,. .. .. 827 Arts $31,922 $31,723 $4,950 $5,200 $6,900 $4,950 $4,950 834 Staring Lake Concert Series - - 22,350 22,350 22,350 22,350 22,350 835 Summer Theatre - - 5,000 5,250 5,250 5,000 5,000 ....:....rr. . ....r..r:.::..:.r....J:F. :.. ..v. : ....: ... ,J......, ... r..r.:... .r.».......................... ................:v:..:.::...:.:;... ...: •.!-3%: . .. J .::r /........ r.r..r......r...f .. ... .: .».....:.......:.../........ .................... ........ ...,. ..f-->: '.>"f•Sr :::.j:.'±y •:::N::::is•;;:.:•i••. .. ......: r......:...r....�.J......./..r..r.:..r.r.................r:.:., r.. .,. ....:........,.:.. .... ......rr:::::::r•:..:•:::.: :,•f.-..i.: :>`::i;<{'.--... :T �y(f ;aj::>::• :::. �'3�[:.'::�:ism::::"'''':''.�'`,r(i`'''�-:�U��:aii:��i,i%, :::� .ti��.... ..f. ,/ ./. 1.M.. r:f..r. � .... .�� .r. .� �.:.:::.. .. ...........:....r1.:..,.»..:,:......:......%r:r:....:.r..,.n�... ..r....../.. .,. �iy,'................... :::. ..................:.,::.:::.::: ..�..•.-.+... �>:.»:->::::.. ...�..:..: .c-: .....1..........:...:. ... ... •: ,.:...r ... f:;..... .r.r.:l:.:.:r...r:r. r.....r..:,.:..r../,.:..:r..:.::.., ,.:r...... ....:. .r.....r.::': 3563 REVENUE $11,000 $3,775 $7,000 $6,500 $6,500 $,6,500 $6,500 3861 Other Contributions $3,500 $3,500 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- Eden Prairie Lioness Club J:v:::::'SS%•> •ii1•i:»:»:::%.SY::.»:.i:{t�:{:.•:.:':�:y'tiii%':.:>:t5.:r :.:..v. ..:.:::v-»:»:::.;.::: ......,.:.'J:•:.:>.:v:::::..,. .v.:, .... ::4r:v::.v»::%.>:;.:i!:::•:ii::i::is... ...........:..:::::... :..:..i:!. ./:f.•:::!•,•.f.r.- ... .:h:+:.+i>:t:{;:v>%...... ... . . ...v. .. . .... ,... .... . ......I..:::>.. .:::ry::........ ../::....... :.J.S ..t'�✓.. :.. : .:. ..... ... ...f. ...f...::... /.f.. .. .4 :�,.rf.:J.::::.»:a::. .., ��.:a.> �.'�#s : :�aid!:5�:>.r r.rFJ>: +R��': �f%` ':f... �<a�. ��>',�. ... ..J).+� ..v..:.:. ... ..r:. ../ ..1.J.J...:..:... J. .r,.::..... .. ... .....r.... ..l.. ..'Y...f�p': .. .; ..J-::5i>s...r.:r ..1... .. ,. 1........»..r.....: :»...Jr .:.».r.:.r.. :....!».:..:.:. f ..F.../.......r..». : ..... :..,........ ....... .. .........:.....:..1.; v..... .. ....: ...r.:.........r-Yf-{.:..r»..,...»...:..»:f.-:�:».:.,.............. ... r..r.. ............................,..... 80- Arts- $32,800 proposed base budget and$34,500 proposed service budget(increased by$500-base budget/$2,200- service budget) • Staring Lake Concert Series Promotional T-Shirts(increased by $300) • Contractual Services(increased by$1,700) • Cooperative/Collaborative Arts Programs for School Students and Day Care Children Special Arts Initiatives such as an Arts Festival, Poetry Contest, Fall Performance Program, Arts Appreciation Week, Annual Schooner Days Festival Beach/Street Party, etc. - New Arts Initiatives such as expansion of the SLCS Program, Arts Center, Amphitheatre Lighting,Park-In-Movie, Coffee House Program, etc. • Staring Lake Concert Series Publicity(increased by $50) • Staring Lake Concert Series Advertising(increased by $150) • Artsum/sudgec r .5...r••a•�^W�Wt _ .. EDEN• E DD E NC • • E DD ENC ART ) ART ) PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE ARTS COMMISSION ARTS COMMISSION I y'�aN r a� Y� }✓k l ji 9. $a },),- ,,, z,r ,1 '` `vt='"�:w- "`. ii :e l-...., idw:,;r s, ::.., j i�'ta y • 1 I ` I �� Ii , t• epen , , .. . • .. .. .......,. .. ,,.. . efirl1116 .111e PRAIRIE . ar ts COfflffllSSlOfl ar Ts COMMISSION AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1996 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Patricia Pidcock, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, City Engineer Al Gray, City Planner Mike Franzen, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 16, 1996 B. COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, JULY 23, 1996 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 4 RELATING TO BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION AND ADOPTING CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.99 City Council Agenda Tuesday, August 6, 1996 Page Two C. STARING LAKE TOWNHOMES by Pulte Master Builders. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.62 acres and RM-2.5 on 15.33 acres and PUD District Review on 18.95 acres; Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 18.95 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Staring Lake Townhomes by Pulte Master Builders. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and HWY 169. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change and PUD District Review and Resolution for Site Plan Review) D. TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS by Mike Eiker. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Neighborhood Commercial District on 2 acres; Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 2 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Tom Thumb Gas Pumps by Mike Eiker. Location: Southeast corner of Dell Road and Townline Road. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) E. HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.27 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.27 acres; Adoption of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.27 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Hartford Area One Retail 1996 by Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota. Location: Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) F. RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR PRIMARY ELECTION AND GENERAL ELECTION G. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION FOR COMMUNITY CENTER DEVELOPMENTAL ICE PROGRAM H. RECOMMENDATION FOR POLICY ALLOWING NON-PROFIT GROUPS TO CHARGE FOR PARKING OR ADMISSION TO TOURNAMENTS IN PARKS I. REQUEST TO EXPAND CURRENT YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM TO INCLUDE OPEN SKATING, ETC. City Council Agenda Tuesday, August 6, 1996 Page Three J. APPROVE BID TO BEGIN ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM K. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MINNESOTA TREE THIRD ADDITION (located south of Valley View Road and west of 1-494) L. ADOPT RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 93-5311 M. ADOPT RESOLUTION FOR NO PARKING FOR DELL ROAD, I.C. 93-5311 N. AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND RESOLUTION OF ABATEMENT FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 2, MAPLE LEAF ACRES 9TH ADDITION O. APPROVE LIMITED USE PERMIT WITH MnDOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DELL ROAD THROUGH TH 212 RIGHT-OF- WAY, I.C. 93-5311 P. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GIFT OF REAL PROPERTY FROM RICHARD MILLER V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. KOPESKY ADDITION by Wayne Kopesky. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.32 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.32 acres into 13 lots. Location: West 82nd Street. (Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Continued from July 17, 1996 B. SOUTHWEST CROSSING 1996 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT by BTO Development. Request for Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 109 acres. Location: Viking Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment) City Council Agenda Tuesday, August 6, 1996 Page Four C. SOUTHWEST CROSSING GOLDEN TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTER by MEPC American Properties, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.10 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 11.10 acres, Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park on 11.10 acres, Site Plan Review on 11.10 acres. Location: Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park) D. HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY by HDMG. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.2 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.58 acres, Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres, Site Plan Review on 2.58 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.2 acres into 2 lots. Location: Rowland Road and Shady Oak Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres, Resolution for Preliminary Plat) E. RILEY CREEK RIDGE by Hustad Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77, Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 134 lots. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 1ST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 BY ADDING SECTION 9.82, RELATING TO THE EMERGENCY SECURING OF BUILDINGS AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9.99 VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS City Council Agenda Tuesday, August 6, 1996 Page Five X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Presentation of 1995 Audit 2. Set Date for Future Discussions on Toll Road Proposal 3. Update on Telecommunications Subcommittee C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & FACILITIES 1. Request from Doug and Susan Hevvaert D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,JULY 16, 1996 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Ronald Case, Patricia Pidcock, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra- Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly,City Planner Mike Franzen, City Engineer Al Gray, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL AWARD CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO WOODLAKE/BFI FOR SPRING COMMUNITY CLEAN-UP EVENT Mayor Harris and Rod Miller,Project Chairman of the Environmental Waste Commission, presented a certification of appreciation to Woodlake/BFI representative Joe Berquist for the spring community clean-up event. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Tyra-Lukens added item XI.A.1. Revised Tree Ordinance and item XI.A.2. Signs for Subdivisions. Harris added item XI.A.3. power Outages. Case added items XI.A.4. Special Recognition for Tria Mann and her helpers for the_Fourth of July Celebration, item XI.A.5. Highview Road Concern, XI.A.6. Crossing to Driskill's Supermarket for Residents of Sterling Pond,XI.A.7. Lighting for Edendale Residents Walking to Prairie Village Mall. Enger added item IV.B. GRANT EARLY GRADING PERMIT FOR CENTEX HOMES FOR MITCHELL VILLAGE PROJECT. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. II. OPEN PODIUM Perry Forster, Vice President of the Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District, thanked the Council for recommending his reappointment to the Watershed District. He distributed copies of a new map of the Riley/Purgatory Creek Watershed District. Copies of the map will be available to the public. Pidcock suggested giving copies to the Chamber of Commerce and CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 2 local hotels. Michael Rush, 16907 Hanover Lane, said he represents the Citizens Against the Toll Roads Committee and asked for time at the next meeting to make a formal presentation to the Council. Harris noted the Council will be setting a date for a formal Public Hearing on the TH 212 Toll Road proposal later in tonight's agenda. I L MINUTES A. COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY.JUNE 25. 1996 MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Minutes of the Council/Staff workshop held Tuesday, June 25, 1996, as published. Motion carried unanimously. B. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING: TRANSPORTATION & SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD MEETING HELD TUESDAY. DULY 2. 1996 MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Pidcock,to approve the Minutes of the Joint City Council/Housing Transportation & Social Services Board meeting held Tuesday, July 2, 1996, as published. Motion carried unanimously. C. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. JULY 2, 1996 Tyra-Lukens said the second sentence of the last paragraph on page 9 should be changed to read "...back on ways wetland mitigation could be done on City...." MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock, to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, July 2, 1996, as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. GRANT EARLY GRADING PERMIT FOR CENTEX HOMES FOR MITCHELL VILLAGE PROJECT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve items A and B of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. STARING LAKE TOWN : OMES by Pulte Master Builders. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density, High Density and Office to Medium Density Residential on 18.93 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural a CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 3 to RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 on 18.93 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 54.5 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 18.93 acres, Site Plan Review on 18.93 acres,Preliminary Plat of 88.5 acres into 26 lots and 2 outlots, and EAW review. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and Hwy. 169. (Resolution 96- 111 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 and PUD District Review, Resolution 96-112 for PUD Concept Review,Resolution 96-113 for Preliminary Plat, and Resolution 96-114 Finding the EAW does not Require an EIS) Continued from 6/18/96 Gary Grant, Tom Stanke, and Ron Bestyr, representing Pulte Homes, reviewed the revised project which now includes four styles of homes, three tot lots, a 75-foot conservancy strip between the NURP pond and Purgatory Creek, and a 200 foot conservancy area between the NURP pond and the development and a possible parking lot for 20-25 cars for overflow parking from the school and swimming pool. Tyra-Lukens asked how the proposed berming compares to what is currently there. Bestyr reviewed the location, heights and sight lines of the berms. Franzen said at the May 7, 1996,meeting,the City Council identified seven points for Staff and the developer to work on. He noted the plans have changed dramatically, with the biggest change being reduction in the size of the project from 88.5 to 54.5 acres. The number of units is reduced from the original 788 to 692 to 448, and there is an additional townhome product offered on walkout lots. He said Phase 2 approval for rezoning would be based on plans presented with Phase 1, and the developer would work on permanent berming and landscaping before starting construction on Phase 2. Tyra-Lukens asked if the Staff conditions included a sidewalk and trail to be constructed along Columbine Road. Franzen said there will be an eight-foot wide bituminous trail along one side and a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the other. Harris asked if Staff was also recommending the signalizing of Columbine in addition to Fountain Place. Dietz said they were not,because of the reduced amount of traffic from what was originally proposed; however, Staff would continue to monitor the traffic. Case asked if we plan to put the signal in at Fountain Place soon and then have the State reimburse us. Dietz said they are working on a cooperative agreement with MNDoT that is likely to occur in 1997; however, we could build it at the City's cost and be reimbursed by MNDoT later. Case asked if there is a possibility we would not get reimbursed, as he understood it was a sure thing. Dietz said he did not know if we have an agreement to that effect. Harris asked if we are suggesting that we need to put the signal in prior to 1997. Case thought this project should not go forward without the signalizing. Dietz said he would try to gain assurances from the State 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 4 regarding the reimbursement. Harris thought it was a separate issue whether it was needed prior to Phase 2 of the project. Dietz said Staff will look into the issue. Lambert said the Parks Commission expressed concern about maintaining a 200-foot setback from the NURP pond. He noted they have moved the tot lots into the center of the site and have added one tot lot as well as trails connecting units with the tot lots and trails along Staring Lake Parkway and Columbine. Steve Swanson, 14183 McCoy Court, said he represents a neighborhood group in the Staring Lake area. He believes the quality of the project suffers from its large size. He noted that this is not the only plan that would fit on the site per the Guide Plan. The new proposal still exceeds the maximum for the Guide Plan definition of acreage, and the new proposal is 70 units larger than would be expected based on the prior plan. He did not believe the fourth product being offered in the current plan is really an additional product. They have not provided opportunities for adult recreation. There is a very high proportion of affordable housing, and he thought the intent of the Met Council was to not concentrate affordable housing in one area. He reviewed an alternate plan that would limit development to 48.5 residential acres and would take 48 units out of the development. He wanted to get more information on the 34-acre portion of the site that is not being proposed for development, as a portion of that site is still guided high density residential. Paul Olson, 8899 Flesher Circle, referred to an article in the Sunday Minneapolis Tribune that said there is an affordable housing development in Chanhassen for 140 units with a density of three units per acre. This project is 2-1/2 times the number of units per acre over the development in Chanhassen. He thought this was a bad project to begin with. Anne Pitzer, 8820 Flesher Circle, said she visited the Spinnaker Cove development in Woodbury and thought the landscaping was atrocious. She passed around a picture of the landscaping at that project. She said the project still doesn't feel like a project she would like to live by, and she thought we are rushing it through. Suzanne Meade, representing Pulte Homes, said the landscaping at Spinnaker Cove was put in last year and did not survive the winter well. She said it has now been replaced by a greater variety and with better placement Peter Delius, 15790 Summit Drive,thought the issue is really making a zoning change from commercial/office to residential, and the question is if the area was zoned as commercial in the Guide Plan. Enger said most of Eden Prairie remains in a rural zoning until a plan is brought forth. The current Guide Plan designation goes back eight years and was partially in response to a proposed development brought forth at that time. Enger said it is not uncommon that the Guide Plan is changed, and what is being proposed tonight requires a very small change to the Guide Plan. Chester Baker, 8918 Pine Bluff Court, thought there should be more break up of the visual monotony and there should be more interior plantings. He thought the City needs to overhaul the evaluation and approval process to include a larger voice for the 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 5 community it affects. He suggested there be a referendum, mail in vote or a citizens' watch-dog group to approve projects. Michael Rush, 6907 Hanover, said he agreed with forming a watch-dog group to make sure the City grows as it should and to make sure residents receive intelligent answers to problems, have access to data, and have their requests treated with courtesy. Karen Sell, 8796 Flesher Circle, reviewed her concerns about the project and about development in Eden Prairie. She was concerned about setting a precedent for development of other neighborhoods. Larry Berger, 8780 Flesher Circle, was concerned about the demographics of Eden Prairie and was happy to hear about the watch-dog committees. Rob Cooper, a realtor in Eden Prairie, said he has clients who have bought Pulte Homes. He said there is a lack of affordable housing in Eden Prairie for buyers who make $30,000 - $40,000 per year. Karen Tadich, 14366 Starrwood, thought the number of months it takes for a good plan should not determine that we need to accept the project at this time. Marna Reilly, 8956 Garland Court, was concerned about safety of children. She did not like the idea of being motivated by fear of a lawsuit by the Douglas Corporation if the project is not approved. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried unanimously. Harris noted that the Council will make a decision on the project as it is proposed tonight. She reviewed the system within which the City Council operates and said the Council's job is to balance the best interests of those who are here with those who are to come and those who have landowner rights. Case believed 448 townhomes on 54 acres is about as good a use as we will get on this property. He was okay with the fourth model as presented tonight and with the three tot lots to alleviate the need for internal parks without losing the cash park fee. He would like to see the variation in roofing colors and would like to have the NURP pond open space area dedicated to the City. The City could then negotiate with the School District to pay for the 25 space parking lot. He wanted to have the City agree to place in the 1997 budget the signal at Fountain Place and Hwy. 169 if it was true we could be reimbursed by the State later, and have it in place when Columbine south of Anderson Lakes Parkway is completed. He said he won't vote for rezoning of Phase 2 unless it has the same number or less units. Regarding the issue of changing the process, he said we have discussed with Staff ways to educate the Council about projects coming through so that we can handle phone calls. He thought this is a much S CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 6 better project thanks to the community involvement. We need to develop the City with a range of housing available. Tyra-Lukens asked if we get tax revenue from the land if a portion is dedicated to the City. Enger said not if it was dedicated to the Public and very little or none if it were retained by the H.O.A. as an open space outlot.. Tyra-Lukens said we have agreed as a Council to try to promote a mix of housing in new developments. She was concerned about the problems expressed by the residents. She thought this is very definitely an improved plan; however, she has concerns about the number of units and the landscaping. She did not like to see the units loom over Staring Lake Park, and it is still a huge project Our request for architectural diversity has been ignored. We asked for a fourth unit and didn't get it. The response to our request for greater variation in the units was not what she had in mind. This is not scattered site affordable housing as we strategized it. She was concerned about concentrating most of our affordable housing along the Anderson Lakes Corridor because it may result in a lack of integration into the community. Harris thought the project is greatly changed from the original proposal, and it will give the City market rate affordable housing with less density than could be developed on this property. No wetland fill is needed and there is no tree loss. It meets every City ordinance for medium density residential property. The open space compares favorably with properties to the north and west, and it has a NURP pond to protect the water quality of Staring Lake. The plan has been amended to incorporate all of the concerns of the regulatory agencies and it will accommodate space for additional parking. She thought the project is acceptable and it does meet all of the eleven criteria. Pidcock thought the project has taken a turn around since it was started thanks to the work of the residents. She said this community wants its teachers and others who work here, its young people starting out and its retired people all to be able to live here. This project will give them that opportunity. The taxes from the project will bring in approximately$900,000 per year. Another important right to consider is the right of the proponent to develop the property. We can suggest changes and set standards for landscaping, exteriors and open spaces for the area but we cannot deny them the right to develop their property. However, she thought there are things the proponent can change, including the roof lines and the exteriors. Thorfinnson said he prides himself on coming here without a predisposed agenda and with an attitude of doing the best job he can. He does not make up his mind quickly and only after getting the information. He said there is no question that the process could always be improved, and more people should have been notified about the project in the beginning. We need to change that and make people feel a part of the process. We will work on that; however, he thought the process does work and has worked well for many years. He thought we should have some direction tonight on how we should handle the additional parking and the signal lights on Fountain Place. He was comfortable with some kind of office on the east side of the property, but CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 7 wanted to be sure that Phase 2 would be less than proposed or the same. He thought the City has standards for landscaping that should address the concerns expressed about the quality of the landscaping. He was comfortable with the size of the project, but thought they need to work a little more on the architectural diversity. Harris asked if the recommendations of Staff would address the concerns expressed by Councilmembers Case and Thorfinnson. Enger said they would. Harris summarized the concerns expressed by the Council: varying the roofing materials;signalization of Hwy 169 and Fountain Place;greater architectural diversity; the conservancy area near the NURP pond to be dedicated to the City; and the issue of additional parking. She was not sure how to handle the whole issue of the additional parking. Case said the additional parking was needed last year, and he suggested that Staff contact the School District to get some better determination that they will put in the money to build the additional parking. Pidcock was concerned that the parking be available to the general public and not just to the School District. Case thought that was understood, as the current parking lot at the school operates under that assumption. Enger said Staff would contact the School District immediately, and asked if the Council would expect the School District to maintain the parking area. Harris said we would. Case asked if the School District maintains the parking lot that serves the pool. Enger said they do. Tyra-Lukens said she would like to make sure proponent provides an additional ten feet of trees west of the storm water pond, per the recommendations and that a sidewalk be built on the loop roads. Franzen said we would require a five-foot wide sidewalk within the major loop road. Tyra-Lukens suggested proponent work with the Heritage Preservation Commission on street naming. The architecture and variations should be no less than discussed and hopefully much greater, and the berms and plantings should be as indicated in the packet. Buildings that need additional sound-proofing must be constructed that way. She thought we need to take care of the office and high density piece and make it all office. Enger said the Council could make a motion that the Guide Plan include that change. Case said he would like to handle the issue of the signal at Fountain Place by having Staff find out if the State will reimburse us. If they will reimburse, then the signal should be put in the 1997 budget; if they will not reimburse, then the issue should come back to the Council to determine what action to take. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adopt Resolution 96-111 approving the request by Pulte Homes for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Medium Density, High Density and Office to Medium Density Residential on 18.93 acres and to change the aggregate parcel east of Columbine to Office. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution 96-112 approving Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 54.5 acres. Motion 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 8 carried with Tyra-Lukens opposed. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adopt the 1st Reading of an Ordinance approving Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 on 18.93 acres and Planned Unit Development District Review on 18.93 acres and Site Plan Review on 18.93 acres. Motion carried with Tyra-Lukens opposed. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution 96-113 approving Preliminary Plat of 88.5 acres into 27 lots and 3 outlots (amended plan submitted 7/11/96). Motion carried with Tyra-Lukens opposed. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to adopt Resolution 96-114 Finding of the E.A.W. that no EIS will be required and to direct staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations and the following Council conditions: the roofing color should be varied; there should be greater architectural diversity;the conservancy area near the NURP pond should be dedicated to the City; proponent should work with Staff and the Heritage Preservation Commission on street names; Staff should discuss reimbursement from the State for the signal light at Hwy 169 and Fountain Place; and Staff should discuss with the School District their building the additional parking spaces as soon as possible. Motion carried with Tyra-Lukens opposed. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to grant proponent an early grading permit prior to 2nd Reading at his own risk. Motion carried unanimously. B. KOPESKY ADDITION by Wayne Kopesky. Request for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.32 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.32 acres into 13 lots. Location: West 82nd Street. (Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) Enger said proponent has requested a continuance to the August 6, 1996, meeting. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock, to continue this Public Hearing to the August 6, 1996, City Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. C. VACATION 96-06: VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN SHADY OAK INDUSTRIAL PARK FIFTH ADDITION (Resolution 96-115) Enger said a recent sale of this property brought to light the fact that easements were never vacated on this property. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution 96-115, vacating drainage and utility easements in Shady Oak CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 9 Industrial Park Fifth Addition. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote,with Case, Pidcock, Thorfinnson, Tyra- Lukens and Harris voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 1ST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 4 RELATING TO BEER. WINE AND LIOUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION AND ADOPTING CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.2.2 Enger said the proposed ordinance reflects changes in State Law and changes in line with current practices for temporary liquor licenses. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock, to adopt 1st Reading of an Ordinance amending City Code Chapter 4 relating to beer, wine and liquor licensing and regulation and adopting City Code Chapter 1 and Section 4.99. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. PETITIONS,REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS XL REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Revised Tree Ordinance Tyra-Lukens said some time ago she and Councilmember Case sat in on a group discussion about a revised tree ordinance. Because we are now looking at some development in the southwest quadrant, she would like to have that revision finalized and asked Staff for a status update. 2. Signs for Subdivisions Tyra-Lukens asked why we don't have signs about proposed subdivisions like other communities do. Enger said we have signs that we have used in the past, and we can start using them again. He said the Planning Commission will be discussing the general subject of the process of notification for public 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 10 hearings and what changes should be made to that process. He thought they could include the issue of signs in that discussion, and return to the Council with recommendations. 3. Power Outages Harris said she has received many calls complaining about the frequent power outages. Dietz said he has discussed this with NSP. Today's outage was caused by construction at Anderson Lakes Parkway and Hwy. 18. If a contractor hits a line, they have to pay for the repair; however, insurance coverage is fairly cheap, and there isn't a lot of incentive to be careful. The problem is greater in areas that have buried power lines. Dietz said we could institute some sort of penalty to contractors, but we would be the only ones that impose such a penalty. 4. Special Recognition for Tria Mann (Park& Rec�and her Staff and Dan Carlson (Police) & his Staff for the Fourth of July Celebration Case said he was very impressed with the celebration and asked Staff to communicate our appreciation to all who were involved. He asked if we might be able to give out certificates of appreciation for those who helped with the celebration. Enger said he would convey this to Staff 5. Iighview Road Concern Case said he has received calls asking that the speed limit be lowered for the curve on Highview Road. Dietz said Staff will investigate the issue. 6. Crossing to Driskill's Supermarket for Residents of Sterling Pond Case said he attended the senior issues meeting for Edendale, Sterling Ponds and Elim Shores. One of the issues that was discussed was the difficulty seniors have in crossing the highway to get to Driskill's. He asked Staff to check this out. 7. Lighting for Edendak Residents Walking to Prairie Village Mall Case said another issue brought up at the seniors' meeting was the fact that the path along the north side of the old First Bank building between Edendale and Prairie Village Mall is not lit, and seniors are very nervous about walking that path at night. He asked Staff to check this out also. Enger said Staff will contact the owners of the professional building and the owners of the shopping center about the need for lighting. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER l0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 11 C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION& FACILITIES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR_OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1. Authorization to Enter into a_Brokerage Agreement for New Liquor Store Building with United Properties Enger said Council authorized Staff to enter into an agreement with an architectural firm to develop a new liquor store building. The architect has suggested that he could work with a leasing professional early in the process. They have solicited requests from brokers that specialize in small retail/commercial in this area and have negotiated a draft agreement with United Properties to serve as the broker. He asked the Council to authorize Staff to enter into an agreement with United Properties. Tyra-Lukens asked if there are any stipulations as to the terms of the lease or the type of business that can lease the space. Enger said the terms have to be acceptable to us, and the use would have to be complimentary to a liquor store. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Pidcock, to authorize Staff to enter into a listing agreement with United Properties for lease of space in the new liquor store building. Motion carried unanimously. E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Award Contract for Water Treatment Plant Expansion.I.C. 94-5350 Dietz said we received bids a few weeks ago for the water treatment plant expansion, and Staff is recommending the award be made to Knutson Construction Company. The bid includes a one-year service agreement and an engine generator that will enable us to get reduced rates from NSP and provide a back-up system for the facility. It also includes the reroofing of the existing building which has been budgeted in previous years'budgets but had been deferred until this project. He said there will be an additional expense for the educational space, but that is a separate issue. He said they received a letter of concern from the second lowest bidder pointing out some irregularities in the way the bids were received; however, we believe the irregularities were minor, and their bid was considerably higher than Knutson's. Case said we have had a workshop about this project, as well as spending several years of study before the project was authorized. Harris thought the addition of the engine generator and the reroofing of the present facility are both very important. 1' CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 12 MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Pidcock, to award the Water Treatment Plant Expansion to Knutson Construction Company in the amount of$20,193,000,plus$11,000 for the add alternate award for one-year service and maintenance contract for the plant control system, for a total award of $20,204,000. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Set Public Meeting Date for TH 212 Toll Road Harris said the Council promised a public meeting would be held to discuss this issue once information was available on the proposed road. Dietz said it appears that the best date is July 30, 1996, and the Heritage Rooms would provide the most space. They would set up TV cameras and a P.A. system in other areas of the City Center. Thorfinnson thought it was important to clarify that this is a Public Hearing, not an Open House. Tyra-Lukens asked why she had not received any information on the project if it is available. Dietz said they have a draft copy of a lengthy agreement between MNDoT and the proponent that describes the financial arrangements. He said the agreement could go in a final form to the Commissioners in the first part of August. After the Commission signs off, there would be a thirty- day period for communities to exercise their veto power. Harris asked if there are any indications of a change in the originally-proposed track or other details. Dietz said they would build it in accordance with the EIS and there were some modifications for ramps; however, the basic project remains the same. Harris asked if that information would be available. Dietz said it could be, and asked if the Council wanted to have a presentation about the draft. Harris thought it would be useful for the Council and those who attend the hearing. Case asked if we could bullet some facts that have become erroneous and possibly summarize the EIS. Dietz asked if the Council would like Staff to do the presentation, or if they should ask the proponent to do it. Thorfinnson was not sure the proponent would be the right one to do it. Case said he was really interested in having a fact sheet available. Harris said we need enough information for the public and the Council to be aware of what, precisely, we are discussing. She liked the idea of some kind of executive summary. The Council agreed to extend the meeting to 11:15 p.m. Tyra-Lukens asked if there would be time for another Public Hearing in August after the agreement is finalized with MNDoT. Case thought we may need a workshop session with Staff as well as a second public meeting. Dietz said this Public Hearing would give an opportunity for the public to tell us ID CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 13 their concerns. We might not necessarily address those concerns that night; rather, we could have a subsequent meeting at which we could make a presentation and try to address all the issues that surface at the meeting on the 30th. Tyra-Lukens thought that would be a very productive way to do it. Thorfinnson thought people are feeling like they haven't had an opportunity to speak, and we need to let them do that rather than spending time on a presentation. Tyra-Lukens would like to have a basic fact sheet. Michael Rush was very concerned about the erroneous information that is going around about the project, and would like to have a chance to review the facts at the hearing. Harris thought we might want to print the fact sheet in the newspaper like a public notice. Dietz was concerned that a fact sheet Staff prepared might become the focus of what people are commenting on. He thought we should hear what people are concerned about, and then we could clear up erroneous data at another meeting. Rush wanted an opportunity to have dialogue at the hearing. Harris suggested Staff determine the best way to get participation and possibly arrange to have a call-in during the cablecast. Joe Brady asked if there is a possibility of a referendum on this issue. Assistant City Attorney Rosow said State Law does not provide for the opportunity of a referendum on this type of issue, and we could not spend public funds for a referendum. Brady thought it was important to have a popular vote on this and use that vote for the determination. MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Case, to set Tuesday, July 30, 1996, 7:00 PM, City Center Heritage Rooms, for the public meeting on TH 212 Toll Road. Motion carried unanimously. F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Pidcock moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 11:20 p.m. 15 l�ein -1E6 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 23, 1996 7:00 p.m. CITY CENTER COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP Heritage Room IV, 8080 Mitchell Road COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Ronald Case, Patricia Pidcock, Ross Thorfinnson, and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Finance Director John Frane, Assistant Finance Director Don Uram, Director of Assessing Steve Sinell, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, Director of Human Resources & Community Services Natalie Swaggert, Director of Inspections Kevin Schmeig, Director of Parks, Recreation & Facilities Bob Lambert, Chief of Police Jim Clark, Fire Chief Spencer Conrad, Police Communications Specialist Gary Therkelson, Accountant Sue Kotchevar, and Recording Secretary Barbara Anderson CALL TO ORDER The meeting began at 7:07 p.m. Councilmember Ron Case was excused. H. J997 PRELIMINARY BUDGET Jullie introduced the preliminary budget presentation. A. REVIEW OF MAY 26, 1996 MEETING Enger reviewed the latest revisions to the proposed 1997 Budget. He described the tax base spread and valuations of property which make up the main part of the budget. The 6% tax increase last year was accepted reluctantly but a similar increase would not be accepted this year. Staff has tried to project the expenses for the coming year based on land values and project assumptions and it is not as accurate as they would like it to be. Staff developed three scenarios for the Council to consider. B. BUDGET MODEL Enger reviewed the three proposed scenarios. Scenario 1 includes the 1997 Departmental Base Budget, Salaries and Benefits, and 4.5 new positions. This is the scenario staff is presently recommending to the Council. Scenario 2 includes all of Scenario 1, with the addition of funds for Capital Improvements. Scenario CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES Tuesday, July 23, 1996 Page 2 3 includes all those previous listed, and the addition of funds for Capital Maintenance and a 1997 Departmental Service Budget. Enger noted that funds could be moved into the Capital Maintenance fund from the Special Assessment fund which would enable the maintenance work to be accomplished. C. TAX IMPACT MATRIX Enger discussed the impacts of the three budget scenarios on the taxes of Eden Prairie residents as well as the impacts on commercial and office properties. A 5.1% increase has been approved and residents were notified. Most residential properties in Eden Prairie fall into the $100,000 to $200,000 valuation range. Sinell commented that the tax increases from commercial and apartments are recovering faster than was initially expected. He noted the valuation was still behind but was continuing to increase and the percentage of change was significant in this area. Pidcock inquired if staff had factored in the legal ramifications from appeals on taxes and Sine!!responded that he was just finishing up the appeals from last year now. It appears that the City will not lose much on appeals as the valuations from the Assessing Department have been very close to the selling prices on properties which have changed hands this past year. However, it will take time for staff to process all that information. Enger noted that 95% of the budget projections was based on tax revenues collected by the City. He noted that homesteaded properties would impact those revenues. D. BUDGET ALTERNATIVES Enger requested direction from the Council as to how staff should proceed in developing the budget. If Scenario 1 is adopted it would put the City in the black for the next five years. Staff will have time over the next 30 days to go back over line items in the proposed budget with Department heads and refine them. Tyra- Lukens inquired if the benefits for the new positions were included in the benefit figures and Swaggert responded that they were. Jullie noted that the Public Safety joint training program with Edina had not been included but they would be asking for some funds for this. Clark commented that it would probably not be asked for in 1997. Julie noted that the Council may have to find some funding for training. Pidcock asked if there could be some cost sharing by those communities that would be involved in the training and Clark responded they would explore those possibilities. Mayor Harris inquired how the Council members felt about the various scenarios presented by staff. Thorfinnson responded that he would have to support Scenario 1 with reservations, and Tyra-Lukens concurred. Enger commented that the City had recovered from a $1.6 million deficit and they have only had a 1.8% cost of living increase which gave them the ability to maintain a balanced budget. Building permit fees were raised last year but they will stay the same this year. Jullie commented that the taxation levels are going down which is the direction 2 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES Tuesday, July 23, 1996 Page 3 they want them to go. E. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS Thorfinnson requested staff to compile the full cost of hiring the new staff requested, and not just the costs of benefits and salaries. Enger commented that Eden Prairie has a large number of facilities to maintain given the size and population of the community. Eden Prairie is viewed as one of the most desirable communities to live in given this feature. Pidcock inquired if there was any means of determining which services would not be missed if they were scaled back or eliminated. Tyra-Lukens asked if there were any way of determining what the actual costs of performing services was in order to select which services might be trimmed back or deleted. Enger commented that there will be a slightly lower level of service provided to the residents across the board given the amount of the proposed budget and the endeavors of the City to keep tax increases to a minimum, but he did not believe that it would have as great an impact that way. Thorfinnson requested a list of what the City spends on services so they can determine what to cut or modify. Mayor Harris stated she was not comfortable with Scenario 1. Discussion ensued to determine the most efficient way of realizing the goal of reducing some services and still maintaining an acceptable service level at a reduced cost. Revenue income is based on the tax levy, fees, and other monies and must be balanced against the total expenses. It would appear that there is only a 3.5% spending increase over last year's budget. Thorfinnson commented that this area needed further exploration and the technology levels in the City need to be kept current to prevent an even greater expense later on to catch up. Thorfinnson inquired what justified the new positions, and Swaggert responded that there is a large cost in time and labor in hiring new police officers, and initially there were two officers requested. The testing and screening process for police officers is very extensive and time consuming and staff has found that it is usually cheaper to hire two officers at a time to keep the costs per officer down. Dietz stated that the Public Works Maintenance Worker was needed because they had promoted from within and not replaced that person, and given the length of service of most employees in his department they earned more vacation days and another worker was needed to make up the difference. The half-time clerical worker was needed for fleet data input and to keep it current. He noted that since Eden Prairie's growth was nearly complete, they would potentially be hiring two more people over the next five years to have a complete staff in his department. Additional needs would probably be contracted out. Lambert stated that the Parks and Recreation Maintenance Worker position was needed because there was more maintenance work needing to be done now and his department was also accruing more vacation time, which needed to be compensated for. The existing staff cannot keep up with the work load and are putting in a lot 3 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES Tuesday, July 23, 1996 Page 4 of overtime, which is more expensive. Park facilities are aging and need more repair. Staff reviewed the existing trail system and prepared a list of trails which needed replacement or repair. Dietz commented that major trail repair and replacement will cost about $200,000 and the new requirements bring it to over $600,000. Staff had discussed fixing the level of spending on trails and having the Park Board determine how it was going to be spent and establishing priorities. Clark stated that hiring new Police officers is expensive as they have to be brained and then become accustomed to the routine and the City and really don't become a viable asset for 6-8 months. Swaggert stated that staff was exploring the possibility that the volunteer coordinator position could be shared with another City to reduce costs and be reevaluated at the end of the year to determine how necessary the position was. Thorfinnson stated they would need to justify the expenses they are incurring to City residents. Pidcock inquired if there were any services that could be sold to raise revenues, and perhaps staff should look at that. Thorfinnson commented that perhaps there were additional fees which could be raised on January 1st that could be taken into account. Sinell stated that fees were not expected to be raised for a while, since they were raised last year, but that did not preclude the Council from raising some of them. Schmeig stated that the building permit fees are based on the Uniform Building Code fee schedule, and the City of Eden Prairie raises their fees about 9 months after the surrounding communities raise theirs, which results in few complaints from developers and residents. Mayor Harris requested staff to review the fee schedule. III. OTHER BUSINESS Mayor Harris noted that former Mayor Paul Redpath had passed away and inquired what acknowledgment the City was sending. Swaggert stated that the City was sending a large floral arrangement to the funeral on Thursday evening. IV. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. L/ OPCITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: C—Cr1 SECTION: Consent Calendar 8-6-96 warm DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Pat Solie Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR(Multi-Family& Comm.) GASFITTER Aromas Deli & Catering Bruckmueller Plumbing Craig Brands Construction, Inc. Diversified Mechanical Services Construction Concepts, Inc. Leeann Chin, Inc. HEATING & VENTILATING Steve's Roofing Service Diversified Mechanical Services PLUMBING Paul Falz Company, Inc. Rick Plumbing&Heating, Inc. City View Plumbing&Heating South Metro Plumbing& Heating, Inc. Craft Plumbers Econoplumb, Inc. SEPTIC SYSTEMS Randy L. Monson Plumbing Rick Plumbing&Heating, Inc. A-1 Rootmaster South Metro Plumbing&Heating, Inc. Rybak-Kupfer Zimco Specialties,Inc. Action/Direction: August 6, 1996 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 6, 1996 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2nd reading of an ITEM NO. Finance Ordinance amending the City Liquor Code Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve the 2nd reading of an Ordinance for amendment of the City Liquor Code relating to the issuance of temporary liquor licenses. Background: The first reading of this ordinance was given at the July 16, 1996, council meeting. The proposed amendment to the City Code is related to the issuance of temporary liquor licenses. The amendment reflects changes in the laws relating to the number of temporary liquor licenses which may be issued. At the same time the amendment proposes changing the consecutive days from three to four, which has been permitted by the law for some time. In addition, the amendment substitutes the word "any municipality" for "city" with regard to liquor catering services. This is probably more in line with present actual practice. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. -96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 4 RELATING TO BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION AND ADOPTING CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 4.31, Subd. 1 is amended to read as follows: "SECTION 4.31. TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE. Subd. 1. The Council may issue to a club, charitable, religious, or other non-profit organization in existence for at least three (3) years, or to a political committee registered under Minnesota Statutes Section 1OA.14 ( "organization") , a temporary license for the on-sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event held within the City and sponsored by the licensee. The license may 'authorize the on-sale of intoxicating liquor for not more than four (4) consecutive days and may authorize on-sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. No more than (a) , three (3) four-day, four (4) three-day, or six (6) two-day in any combination not to exceed 12 days per year temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses may be issued to any one (1) organization or for any one location, within a twelve (121 month period or (b) one (1) temporary license to any one organization for any one location within any 30-day period. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full-year on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. Temporary licenses are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except those relating to insurance required by State law and/or City Code and except those which by their nature are not applicable. Temporary licenses are not valid unless first approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety. " • -1- t?.ct 96, 60 mflr £00-d 8£S-1 080-J N09839389 AThd 9NU1 £TL06Z8ZT9 Section 2 . City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 4.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3 . This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1996, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1996. City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1996 . C:\ap5i\rap\Gp\ord\liquor_tom • s -2- ict qF 60 mtlr PeO-d 82S-1 080-d N0S21393d9 AlIbd 9Ntil £TL06Z8ZT9 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-6-96 SECTION: 2ND READING CCon I,) ITEM NO. C. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger STARING LAKE TOWNHOMES Michael Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.62 acres and RM-2.5 on 15.33 acres and PUD District Review on 18.95 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 18.95 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Zoning Ordinance 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement STARING LAKE TOWNHOMES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 29-96-PUD-12-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 Zoning District 29-96-PUD-12-96 (hereinafter "PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM- 2.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of August 6, 1996, entered into between Staring Lake Townhomes, and the City of Eden Prairie(hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. 2 Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-12-96-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 16th day of July, 1996, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 6th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: John D.Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 STARING LAKE TOWNHOMES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 29-96-PUD-12-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Anderson Lakes Parkway and HWY 169 from Rural to RM-6.5 on 3.62 acres and RM-2.5 on 15.33 acres and PUD District Review on 18.95 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A,included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Franc /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATE: July 22, 1996 RE: STARING LAKE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS • GUIDE PLAN - PHASE 1 Medium Density That part of Outlot C, RESEARCH FARM 3RD ADDITION, according to the record plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of Line A, hereinaf- ter described, and southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Outlot C; thence North 30 de- grees 55 minutes 20 seconds West along the westerly line of said Outlot C 131 .20 feet; thence continuing along said westerly line North 30 degrees 04 minutes 20 seconds West 357.60 feet; thence continuing along said westerly line North 9 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds West 106.00 feet; thence con- tinuing along said westerly line North 21 degrees 16 minutes 05 seconds West 28.53 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 77 degrees 41 minutes 26 seconds East 219.74 feet; thence North 37 degrees 03 minutes 26 seconds East 269.25 feet; thence South 54 degrees 45 minutes 19 seconds East 171 .05 feet; thence North 39 degrees 44 minutes 03 seconds East 170.97 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 04 seconds East 257.23 feet to the intersection with said Line A and there terminating. • GUIDE PLAN - FUTURE Office That part of Outlots B and C, RESEARCH FARM 3RD ADDITION, according to the record plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of Line A, hereinafter described, and westerly and northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Outlot B; thence southerly 1025 feet along the southerly extension of the east line of said Outlot B; thence deflect- ing to the right 53 degrees to said Line A and there terminating. • ZONING - PHASE 1 RM 2.5 That part of Outlot C, RESEARCH FARM 3RD ADDITION, according to the record plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southwesterly of Line A, hereinaf- ter described, and southerly of the following described line hereinafter referred to as Line B: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Outlot C; thence North 30 de- grees 55 minutes 20 seconds West along the westerly line of said Outlot C 131 .20 feet; thence continuing along said westerly line North 30 degrees 04 minutes 20 seconds West 289.29 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 60 degrees 34 minutes 24 seconds East 279.59 feet; thence North 73 degrees 40 minutes 28 seconds East 79.10 feet; thence North 60 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East 290.39 feet; thence North 78 degrees 17 minutes 21 seconds East 281 .04 feet to the intersection with said Line A and there terminating. RM 6.5 That part of Outlot C, RESEARCH FARM 3RD ADDITION, according to the record plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying westerly of Line A, hereinafter de- scribed, northwesterly of Line B, described above, and southeasterly of the follow- ing described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Outlot C; thence North 30 de- grees 55 minutes 20 seconds West along the westerly line of said Outlot C 131 .20 feet; thence continuing along said westerly line North 30 degrees 04 minutes 20 seconds West 357.60 feet; thence continuing along said westerly line North 9 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds West 106.00 feet; thence con- tinuing along said westerly line North 21 degrees 16 minutes 05 seconds West 28.53 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence North 77 degrees 41 minutes 26 seconds East 219.74 feet; thence North 37 degrees 03 minutes 26 seconds East 269.25 feet; thence South 54 degrees 45 minutes 19 seconds East 171 .05 feet; thence North 39 degrees 44 minutes 03 seconds East 170.97 feet; thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 04 seconds East 257.23 feet to the intersection with said Line A and there terminating. STARING LAKE TOWNHOMES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR STARING LAKE TOWNHOMES BY PULTE MASTER BUILDERS WHEREAS, Pulte Master Builders has applied for Site Plan approval of Staring Lake Townhomes on 18.95 acres for construction of 252 townhome units located at Anderson Lakes Parkway and HWY 169 to be zoned RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on July 16, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its March 25, 1996,April 8, 1996 and April 22, 1996, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 16, 1996, meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Pulte Master Builders for the construction of townhomes,based on plans dated July 11, 1996,between Pulte Master Builders, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Mike Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 29, 1996 SUBJECT: Staring Lake Townhouse Developers Agreement At the July 16,1996 meeting the City Council directed staff to prepare an agreement based on the following conditions. Item#1: The roofing color should be varied. There are 10 neighborhoods with a separate color package. This is required by item 4 in the Developer Agreement. Item#2: Greater architectural diversity. In addition to the color schemes,there are two different elevations for each product type. The four unit building has a hip roof and gable roof plan. Item #3: Dedicate the Nurp pond and conservancy area to the City. This is required by item 8 In the Developer Agreement. Item#4: Work with the Heritage Preservation Commission on street names. This is scheduled for a review at the August 19, 1996 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting. Item#5: Staff should discuss reimbursement from the State for the signal at Fountain Place. Staff is currently discussing with the State an accelerated schedule for the construction of the signal. No final decision has been made. Item#6: Discuss with the School District the building of additional parking spaces as soon as possible. Staff has met with Merle Gamin to discuss the construction of parking and reviewed the plan for potential parking next to the Nurp pond and on School property. The area for potential parking on the Staring Lake site will be graded with the construction of the pond. The School District is in the process of determining the cost of construction and did not indicate a time frame for implementation. to ��o•�Cary�sowaw�:8 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT STARING LAKE TOWNHOUSES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of , 19, , by Pulte Homes of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to the City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density, Medium Density, and High Density Residential and Office to Medium Density Residential on 18.95 acres and from Office/High Density Residential to Office on 6.7 acres, Planned Unit Concept Review on 54.5 acres for 448 townhome units, Planned Unit Development District Review on 18.95 acres for 252 townhome units, Zoning District Change from Rural to Rm 6.5 on 3.62 acres and from Rural to Rm 2.5 on 15.33 acres for 252 townhome units, Site Plan Review on 18.95 acres for 252 townhome units, and Preliminary Plat of 88.5 acres into 27 lots and 3 outlots for 252 townhouse units, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Zoning and Planned Unit Development,Resolution No. for Guide Plan Change,Resolution No. Preliminary Plat, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review. Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property as identified in Phase 1 in conformance with the materials revised and dated July 11,1996, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 16,1996, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. IO (f 3. PUBLIC STREETS AND UTILITIES: Developer acknowledges that the street and utility plans for the project are conceptual. Prior to the approval of a final plat, the Developer shall have prepared, by a licensed engineer, construction plans and specifications in accordance with performance standards directed by the City Engineer. The plans shall include Columbine Road between Anderson Lakes Parkway and the south boundary of the property together with the connection of Columbine Road to the Hennepin Technical College entrance road,with entrance road modifications to accommodate the revised intersection. Developer's engineer shall coordinate design and right-of-way changes with the College. Plans and specifications for public streets, sanitary sewer, watermain, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer, together with design calculations, shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to the issuance of a construction permit. All sanitary sewer and watermain shall be public except individual unit services which shall be private. All segments of storm sewer within public road right-of-ways and segments within private property which convey storm drainage from public right-of-way or other private property shall be public and constructed within public right-of-way or easements. Developer shall pay,to the City, a fee of five percent(5%)of the construction cost of public streets and utilities. Developer shall be responsible for the errors and omissions of the Developer's professional consultants and contractors. The construction of all public streets and utilities for the project shall be completed by the Developer in accordance with City Code with the supervision of the Engineer who prepared the plans and specifications. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. 4. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Developer agrees to implement the approved exterior materials and color plan, as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto, concurrent with building construction on the Property and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 5. FINAL GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading plan. Developer shall implement the approved grading and drainage plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved erosion control plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 6. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved irrigation plan concurrent with construction and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials as shown on the landscape plan as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape security equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City code. Developer agrees that the perimeter berming and landscaping shown as part of Phase 2, as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be implemented concurrent with the development of Phase 1. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved landscape plan concurrent with building construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 8. PARK DEDICATION: Developer agrees that prior to the release of the final plat, Outlot D as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto, shall be dedicated to the City for park purposes. The Developer further agrees that Outlot D shall be dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, mortgages,or encumbrances, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the RM 2.5 and Rm 6.5 Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD. A. Waiver from the minimum lot size requirement of 6500 sq. ft. in the RM 6.5 Zoning District to 5,000 sq. Ft._ B. Waiver from the minimum lot size requirement of 30,000 sq. ft. in the RM 2.5 Zoning District to 5,000 sq. ft. C. Waiver from the 75%brick and glass requirement in the RM 2.5 Zoning District to 5%. 10. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of,plans for demolition and/or removal of existing structures, septic systems, and wells on the Property, and restoration of the property to grade. Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of$1,000.00 to guarantee the implementation of the approved plan. City may reimburse itself from the $1000.00 for any cost incurred in securing implementation of the approved plan. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after the City verifies that the approved plan has been implemented without cost to the City. 11. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Said plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for said retaining walls. Upon approval by the Chief Building Official,Developer agrees to implement the approved retaining wall plan, concurrent with the grading, street, and utility construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 12. SIDEWALK AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property,Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, and obtain the Director's approval of detailed plans for sidewalks and trails to be constructed on the Property. Developer shall provide access easements, as determined by the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Director. Said sidewalks and trails shall be constructed in the following locations: A. A five foot wide concrete sidewalk to be located on the east side of Columbine Road as depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail to be located on the west side of Columbine Road as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. B. A five foot bituminous sidewalk located on the Property providing direct pedestrian access from all residential areas to the three mini parks, with a connection to Staring Lake Parkway and Columbine Road as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. Upon approval by the Director of Parks,Recreation, and Natural Resources, Developer agrees to construct,or cause to be constructed, said sidewalks and trails,concurrent with street construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 13. MINI PARKS: Prior to release of any building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit for review and approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, plans for playground equipment in each of the three mini parks which meet City standards for type of ly equipment and safety. Upon approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources, Developer agrees to implement the approved Mini Park plans, concurrent with home construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 14. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each and every sign to be located on the property, Developer, shall file an application with the City Planner for a sign permit. Said application shall include complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location,manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size,material construction, and location of any such sign, consistent with the sign plan shown on Exhibit B and in accordance with the requirements of City code, Section 11.70, Subdivision 5a. 15. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: Developer acknowledges that the City has granted Planned Unit Development Concept approval for Phase 2 as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. Rezoning from Rural to Rm 6.5 for Phase 2 will be based on,but shall not be limited to, a plan with not more than the same number of housing units,and plans with the same architecture, berming,landscaping, open space,recreational areas, sidewalks and trails as shown on the approved Planned Unit Development Plan in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 16. PRIVATE ROADS: Developer agrees that all private drives in the clubhome area, as shown Exhibit B attached hereto, shall be 30 feet wide with one side posted as a fire lane and the other side posted as parking. 17. CASH PARK FEE As required by City Code, Developer shall pay cash park fees for the Property. The cash park fees for the residential portions of the Property shall be paid on a per unit basis on the date of the issuance of each residential building permit. The cash park fee for Outlot C, as shown on Exhibit B, shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat for the property. As of the date of this Developer's Agreement,the cash park fees applicable to the Property are $1200.00 per unit for the residential units, and$4500.00 per acre for Outlot C, or a total of 690,600.00. The amount to be paid by the Developer shall be increased or decreased to the extent that the City Code is amended effective on or before the date payment of cash park fees are due. I� IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. DEVELOPERS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L. Harris, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 , by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation,on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19_,by ,the of , a Minnesota , on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public It/ DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT EXHIBIT C I. Prior to release of any building permit,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for approval two copies of a development plan(1" =100' scale) showing existing and proposed contours,proposed streets, and lot arrangements and size,minimum floor elevations on each lot,preliminary alignment and grades for sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer, 100-year flood plain contours, ponding areas, tributary areas to catch basins, arrows showing direction of storm water flow on all lots, location of walks,trails, and any property deeded to the City. II. Developer shall submit detailed construction and storm sewer plans to the Watershed District for review and approval. Developer shall follow all rules and recommendations of said Watershed District. III. As required by City Code, Developer shall pay cash park fees for the Property. The cash park fees for the residential portions of the Property shall be paid on a per unit basis on the date of the issuance of each residential building permit.The cash park fee for Outlot C, as shown on Exhibit B, shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat for the property. As of the date of this Developer's Agreement,the cash park fees applicable to the Property are$1200.00 per unit for the residential units, and $4500.00 per acre for Outlot C,or a total of 690,600.00. The amount to be paid by the Developer shall be increased or decreased to the extent that the City Code is amended effective on or before the date payment of cash park fees are due. IV. If Developer fails to proceed in accordance with this Agreement within twenty-four(24)months of the date hereof, Developer, for itself, its successors, and assigns, shall not oppose rezoning of said property to Rural. V. Provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against owners, their successors, and their assigns of the property herein described. VI. Developer represents that they have fee title to the property, except: Douglas Skanse With respect to any interest in all portions of the Property which Developer is required, pursuant to this Agreement,to dedicate or convey to the City(the "Dedicated Property"), Developer represents and warrants as follows now and at the time of dedication or conveyance: A. That Developer has marketable fee title free and clear of all mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances. Developer shall provide to the City a current title insurance policy insuring such a condition of title. B. That Developer has not used, employed,deposited, stored, disposed of,placed or otherwise allowed to come in or on the Dedicated Property, any hazardous substance, hazardous waste, pollutant, or contaminant, including, but not limited to, those defined in or pursuant to 42 U.S.C. SS 9601, et. seq., or Minn. Stat., Sec. 115B.01, et. seq. (such substances,wastes,pollutants, and contaminants hereafter referred to as "Hazardous Substances"); Developer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City, its successors and assigns, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense,including reasonable attorneys fees and costs,resulting from or due to the release or threatened release of Hazardous Substances which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been,used, employed,deposited, stored,disposed of,placed, or otherwise located or allowed to be located, in or on the Dedicated Property by Developer, its employees, agents, contractors or representatives. VII. Developer acknowledges that Developer is familiar with the requirements of Chapter 11, Zoning, and Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations, of the City Code and other applicable City ordinances affecting the development of the property. Developer agrees to develop the property in accordance with the requirements of all applicable City Code requirements and City Ordinances. VIII. Prior to release of the final plat,Developer shall pay to City fees for the first three (3)years' street lighting on the public streets adjacent to the property (including installation costs,if any, as determined by electrical power provided), engineering review, and street signs. IX. City shall not issue any building permit for the construction of any building, structure,or improvement on any land required to be subdivided until all requirements listed above have been satisfactorily addressed by Developer. X. Developer shall submit detailed watermain,fire protection, and emergency vehicle access plans to the Fire Marshall for review and approval. Developer shall follow all the recommendations of the Fire Marshall. XI. Developer acknowledges that the rights of City performance of obligations of Developer contemplated in this agreement are special, unique, and of an extraordinary character, and that, in the event that Developer violates, or fails, or refuses to perform any covenant, condition, or provision made herein, City may be without an adequate remedy at law. Developer agrees,therefore,that in the event Developer violates, fails, or refuses to perform any covenant, condition,or provision made herein, City may, at its option, institute and prosecute an action to specifically enforce performance of such covenant. No remedy conferred in this agreement is intended to be exclusive and each shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy. The election of any one or more remedies shall not constitute a waiver of any other remedy. XII. Any term of this Agreement that is illegal or unenforceable at law or in equity shall be deemed to be void and of no force or effect to the extent necessary to bring such term within the provision of any such applicable law or laws, and such terms as so modified and the balance of the terms of this agreement shall be enforceable. XIII. Developer shall,prior to the commencement of any improvements,provide written notice to Paragon Cable, a Minnesota Limited Partnership,the franchisee under the City's Cable Communication Ordinance(80-33) of the development contemplated by this Developer's Agreement. Notice shall be sent to Paragon Cable, 801 Plymouth Avenue North,Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55411. XIV. Prior to building permit issuance,all fees associated with the building permit shall be paid to the Inspections Department, including; Building permit fee, plan check fee, State surcharge, metro system access charge (SAC), City SAC and City water access charge(WAC), and park dedication. Contact Metropolitan Waste Control to determine the number of SAC units. 19 OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN PULTE MASTER BUILDERS AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into as of , 19 ,by and between , a Minnesota corporation,hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. - , changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the RM 2.5 and RM 6.5 District, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. For Guide Plan Change, and Resolution No. for Planned Unit Development as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of 19_,by and between , a Minnesota , and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If , fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof,Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Guide Plan Review identified above,thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. AO IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. OWNERS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L. Harris, Mayor Carl J. Jullie,City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 , by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation,on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 19_,by ,the of , a Minnesota , on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public 2 � EROSION CONTROL POLICY January 1, 1993 EXHIBIT D MISSION STATEMENT At any given time, Eden Prairie has a large amount of property denuded of vegetation with land alteration in progress. Erosion may result from ongoing construction activities such as road and highway projects, industrial, commercial, residential development, and individual house construction. These activities are prone to erosion, producing sediment that can infiltrate storm sewer systems, affect water quality, clog streets and sidewalks, and cause damage to property. The City Council has recognized the need and directed City staff to devise a comprehensive erosion control policy. The benefits of these controls can be realized in improved water quality, increased safety and monetary savii}gs in clean up efforts. The City Council has directed the following Policy to be implemented: 1. All construction projects permitted by the City of Eden Prairie which result in the temporary disturbance of vegetative or non-vegetative surfaces protecting soils from erosion require the use of Best Management Practices(BMP's)as outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's manual, Protecting Water Quality In Urban Areas,to mitigate the impact of erosion on wetland and water resources. The City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may impose special conditions to permits which stipulate erosion control procedures and/or direct the installation of erosion control features or the clean up of erosion at construction sites. Permits effected by this policy include all grading permits, building permits, and permits for the installation of utilities. 2. All erosion control systems stipulated in the permit shall be installed prior to the issuance of the permit. Supplemental erosion control systems ordered by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections shall be installed within 48 hours. 3. All erosion control systems must be maintained by the permittee in a functional condition until the completion of turf and/or structural surfaces which protect the soil from erosion. The permittee must inspect erosion control biweekly and immediately after each rainfall event of.5 inches or more. Needed maintenance shall be performed within 48 hours. 4. Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall be utilized at all construction sites to minimize the trackage or spillage of soil on public streets or highways. BMP's may include, but are not limited to,rock construction entrances, washing stations, frequent cleaning of streets adjacent to the construction site or limiting operations when site conditions are unmanageable. Trackage or spillage of soil on a public street or highway must be cleaned by power sweepers within the time frame stipulated in the permit special conditions or as ordered by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections. 5. If erosion breaches the perimeter of a construction site,the permittee shall immediately develop a clean up and restoration plan,obtain the right-of-entry from the adjoining property owner, and implement the clean up and restoration plan within 48 hours of obtaining the adjoining property owner's permission. In the event eroded soils enter onto or are tracked or spilled on a public street,highway, sidewalk or trail,the permittee shall remove the soil material and thoroughly sweep the street or sidewalk surface within four hours. If eroded soils enter, or entrance appears imminent,into wetlands or other water bodies, clean up and repair shall be immediate. Permittee shall provide all traffic control and flagging required to protect the traveling public during the clean up operations. 22 6. When a permittee fails to conform to any provision of this policy within the time stipulated in a written notification, the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may take the following actions: a. Withhold the scheduling of inspections and/or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. Direct the correction of the deficiency by City forces or separate contract. The issuance of a permit constitutes a right-of-entry for the City or its contractor to enter upon the construction site for the purpose of correcting deficiencies in erosion control. All costs incurred by the City in correcting erosion control deficiencies shall be reimbursed by the permittee. All invoices for erosion control correction shall be due and payable within 30 days. Invoices not paid within 30 days shall accrue interest at a rate of 1%per month. Each charge for correction of erosion deficiencies shall be a lien upon the property to which the permit applies. Invoices more than 30 days old on September 30 or any year or on any other date as determined by the City Engineer or the Director of Inspections may be assessed against the property. As a condition of the permit,the owner shall waive notice of any assessment hearing to be conducted by the City, concur that the benefit to the property exceeds the amount of the proposed assessment and waive all rights by virtue of Minnesota Statute 429.081 to challenge the amount or validity of the assessment. I, We, The Undersigned,hereby accept the terms and conditions of the Erosion Control Policy dated January 1, 1993 as set forth and agree to fully comply therewith to the satisfaction of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota. Applicant's Name(Please Print) Date Applicant's Signature Applicant's Title Office Phone No. Mobile No. Home No. Development Name: Lot: Block: 23 ► h v uoudu3sOQ T OZ d wga 7d EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-6-96 SECTION: 2ND READING (Cons Cal.) ITEM NO. .VD. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS Scott Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the Neighborhood Commercial District on 2 acres; • Approval of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 2 acres; Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review I TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITHIN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the zoning of the land be amended within the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the zoning of the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the Neighborhood Zoning District, and the legal description of land in such District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and is amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1,entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be developed in accordance with plans dated June 25, 1996. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of July, 1996,and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 6th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on • 2 TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE ZONING WITHIN A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance amends the zoning of land located at the Southeast corner of Dell Road and Townline Road within the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District on 2 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 3 MEW uoITtppV pi£ual9 wpm`9 Xaolg `OZ 1O'I :uopduasaU p$a'I sdumd sgo qumq,I,umi, V 3lgmlga TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS BY MIKE EIKER, PUMP AND METER SERVICE WHEREAS,Mike Eiker, Pump and Meter Service has applied for Site Plan approval of Tom Thumb Gas Pumps on 2 acres for construction 2 more gas pumps and extending the canopy, located at the southeast corner of Dell Road and Townline Road to be zoned within the Neighborhood Commercial District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on July 2, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 10, 1996, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 2, 1996, meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Mike Eiker, Pump and Meter Service for the construction of additional gas pumps and extension of the canopy,based on plans dated June 25, 1996,between Mike Eiker,Pump and Meter Service, and the City of Eden Prairie, subject to the following: Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall provide a landscaping plan for the planting of additional landscaping near the Dell Road Townline Road intersection. The proponent shall provide bonding for this landscaping and install the landscaping concurrent with construction. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D.Frane, City Clerk EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-6-96 SECTION: 2ND READING cans eat, _ ITEM NO. 1-V E. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 Michael Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.27 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.27 acres; • Approval of a Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.27 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 28-96-PUD-11-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the "land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the Commercial Regional Service District 28-96-PUD-11-96(hereinafter "PUD-11-96-Com Reg Ser"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of August 6, 1996, entered into between Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter"Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-11-96-Corn Reg Ser, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-11-96-Com Reg Ser is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-11-96-Com Reg Ser is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-11-96-Com Reg Ser are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-11-96-Com Reg Ser is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the I-5 District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 11- 96-Com Reg Ser, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. 2. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled"General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of July, 1996, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 6th day of August, 1996. ATTEST: John D.Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 28-96-PUD-11-96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS,CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows amending of land located at Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive within the Commercial Regional Service District on 1.27 acres; subject to the tenns and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Franc /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) 11 Hartford Area One Retail 1996 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2. dock 1,`. PRAIRIE LAKES BUSINESS: PARK, according to• the recorded plat tkereof, and situate in •Hen in nepCounty, Minnesota. :?hFv"- S[.. LOT D/vSic! LEG AL E/AL DESC r Parcel 1 • That pert of Lot Z Block I, PRAIRIE LAKES BUSINESS PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Ainnesota, lying easterly and scutheestery of a line described as follows.- Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2,• thence South 73 degrees 35 minutes 39 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the north line of said Lot Z a distance of 174.46 feet- to the beginning of the line to be described thence South 08 degrees 57 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of J/7.00' feet; thence South .53 degrees 08 minutes 08 seconds West a distance of 9362 feet to an angle point in the south line of said Lot 2 and said line there terrr.►inating. .Parcel Mgt .part of Lot 2, Block ?, PRAIRIE LAKES cL.SINESS PARK, according to the ce,:oroeC plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly and nertt westery of a line and its northerly extension described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2,• thence South 73 degrees 35 i sites 39 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the north line.of said Lot 2 a distance of 774.45 feet to the :beginning of the line to be described,' thence South 08 degrees 57 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 375.00 feet; thence South 5.: degrees 08 minutes •08 seconds West a distance of 9.3.52 feet to an angle point in 'he south line-of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating_ SITE AREAS: Lot 2, Block 1 4.4299 Acres • .Qenofes iron monument found o Denotes iron monument set • HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR HARTFORD AREA ONE RETAIL 1996 BY RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF MINNESOTA WHEREAS,Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota has applied for Site Plan approval of Hartford Area One Retail 1996 on 1.27 acres for construction of a 6,000 square foot building located at Prairie Center Drive and Prairie Lakes Drive to be zoned within the Commercial Regional Service District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on July 2, 1996; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 10, 1996, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 2, 1996, meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota for the construction of a 6,000 square foot building,based on plans dated July 30, 1996, between Ryan Construction Company of Minnesota, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CO erwormemrado HARTFORD PLACE - 1996 AMENDMENT SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 6, 1996 by RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC. a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Developer's Agreement between RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC. and the City of Eden Prairie for Ryan Construction Company Hartford Place, dated November 1, 1994, (The "Developer's Agreement") for that portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof(The "Property"). NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment in the Commercial Regional Service District and Preliminary Plat Resolution 96-106, and Site Plan Review Resolution Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of the Property as follows: 1. Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated October 4, 1994, reviewed and approved by the City Council on October 4, 1994 and in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 6, 1996, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 6, 1996, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. Developer agrees to and reaffirms all of the terms and conditions and accepts the obligations of"Developer"under the Developer's Agreement, except as inconsistent with or amended by this Supplement. 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: eCJer1 SECTION: Consent Calendar August 6, 1996 prairie DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Resolution Appointing Election Judges IV. F. Background: Appointment of election judges for the primary election, September 10, 1996, and general election, November 5, 1996. Action/Direction: August 6, 1996 Page 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the following persons have agreed to serve as election or alternate judges and are appointed for the Primary Election to be held September 10, 1996, and/or the General Election to be held November 5, 1996. Curtis B.Anderson Dorothy A.Gilk Henning Mogensen Elizabeth C.Anderson Juliet A.Gleason Maxine Moran Fern T.Anderson Janice Grady Joyce M.Myhre Rita L.Anderson Gerald K.Haas Caroline B.Nelson Majorie S.Andrus Rhoda C.Haas Kathryn L.Nelson Nancy J.Autio Ann R.Hagen Marion L.Nesbitt Patricia L.Barker Cheryl A.Hansen Frances M.Neveaux Leone M.Barta June L.Hanson Kathlyn M.Nicholson Bernadine Beauvais Russell W.Hanson Karen Norman Constance B.Blad Anne R.Hawkins Philip J.Olson Cheryl M.Bridge Becky L.Heald William G.Patrek Dolores V.Brown Susan L.Hedberg James R.Rannow Doris R.Brown Carol A.Hegge Betty J. Schaitberger Richard L.Brown Gloria M.Hermann Laura A. Schechter Kathleen D. Childs Bernice M.Holasek Carole J. Sheridan Fay E. Clark Charlotte Hood Eleanor M.Taggatz Jerri L. Coller Robert A.Hovey LeaAnn Thielman Agnes M.Daluge Arlene Howden Marc L.Thielman Willard L.Daluge Dawn M.Hoy Leatrice L.Thompson Pauline B.Dickel Glen H.Isensee Nancy J. Thompson Lorraine A.Dilling Leroy C.Jedlicka Claire L. Tyra Christine A.Dodge Lois B.Jedlicka Mary A.Upton Louise Doughty Joyce H.Jorgenson Barbara A. Vanderploeg Rosalee Dwyer Richard J.Knight JoAnne M.Wilson Frances M.Dye Nancy C.Little Dortha M.Winkel Loretta Ellison Vicki A.Maddy Marie C.Wittenberg Catherine M.Field Mary Merhar Ethyl Wokasch Cheryl L.Frisvold Kathleen A.Millberg Jo Ann Wronski Virgina K.Gartner Ruth H.Mital Ann H. Yonamine Genevieve Gibson Constance L.Mogensen ADOPTED BY by the Eden Prairie City Council on this 6th day of August 1996. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 08/06/96 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO.T.G- DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Evaluation and Recommendation for Community Recreation and Facilities Center Developmental Ice Program Joel Klute BACKGROUND: The current Developmental Ice program is offered year-round with different times depending on the season. In the fall,winter and spring we offer Developmental Ice from 6:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m.and during the summer from 6:00 a.m. to 7:45 a.m. In scheduling Developmental Ice we try to divide Developmental Figure Skating from Developmental Hockey due to figure skates being lifted off the ice which could be a potential hazard. If only one rink is available, we combine them on the same ice surface,but divide the ice in half. Having them divided on two rinks has been requested by the public due to the safety of the skaters. The number of users for Developmental Ice varies considerably per season. In the fall, winter and spring we average 25-30 skaters per day with 65%of the participants utilizing Developmental Hockey and 35%for Developmental Figure Skating. In the summer our participants average 5-10 participants per day with 95% utilizing Developmental Figure Skating and 5%using Developmental Hockey. At the current rate of$2.00 for members, $4.00 for non-members and instructors free, the Community Center is looking into new cost effective ways to offer this program. SURVEY: In surveying the surrounding communities, staff have found only five other Ice Arenas offering a program similar to Developmental Ice. Below is a list of the five communities and what they offer: Bloomington: If the ice is not being used and not scheduled for an hour,they allow participants to pay$6.00 per person to use the ice. There is not a set schedule to this. Chaska: They structured their Developmental Ice program modeling the Eden Prairie Community Center. They offer to sell the ice to their figure skating club first. Then, if it does not sell, they turn it into Developmental Ice on Monday, Wednesday and Friday's from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. They charge $3.00 per participant including instructors, members and non-members. Edina: They offer 'Pros Ice' during the school year only,Monday through Friday from 8:15 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. They charge $4.00 per participant including instructors,members and non-members. Minnetonka: They offer`morning practice' during the school year only from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. They charge through the purchase of passes: 10 hour pass is $50.00 and yearly pass is $250.00. 1 St.Louis Park: They offer 'Pros Ice' for one hour per day on a month to month basis. They charge $5.00 per participant, instructors included. Other Arena's who do not offer Developmental Ice: *Apple Valley *Blake(unavailable at this time) *Burnsville (unavailable at this time) *Hopkins *Richfield *Shakopee *Wayzata RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following changes to Developmental Ice: *Try to sell the ice normally allocated for Developmental Ice. This time period of 6:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m. on weekdays could be sold to the hockey association and other users. *The unsold ice from this time of 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. could then be used for developmental ice in a new two hour block instead of the three hour block used in the past. This would pertain to both Developmental Figure and Developmental Hockey. *The Developmental Ice schedule would now be released on a month to month basis after allowing opportunity to sell the ice. Developmental Ice times would continue to be available to the public through the open skate, open hockey and developmental ice schedule. *Increasing the daily fees on Developmental Ice for all users. The member rate would increase from $2.00 to $4.00. The non-member rate would increase from $4.00 to $6.00. Instructors that use Developmental Ice would start paying the member or non-member fees. REQUEST: Staff requests approval for the restructure of Developmental Ice program to begin implementation September 1, 1996. If you need further information or would like to discuss the program,please contact me at your earliest convenience. 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8/6/96 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. 11. DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Recommendation for Policy Regarding Allowing Recreation and Facilities Non Profit Groups to Charge for Parking or Admission to Tournaments in Robert A. Lambert Parks BACKGROUND: In the past, various associations have installed temporary fencing at Round Lake Park in order to accommodate charging for admission to state tournaments. Since the development of Miller Park, both the Baseball Association and the Girl's Softball Association have charged for parking at Miller Park. This practice has caused some concerns from the Police Department due to the traffic that is backed up on Miller Parkway with unskilled people attempting to direct traffic around cars that are backed up on that public street. Several residents recently raised the question about who authorized an association to charge citizens to park in Miller Park. (These citizens were not attending the baseball tournament.) Other problems that can occur due to the practice of charging for parking in some of the parking lots at Miller Park are that other "free" parking lots fill up before the parking lots where a fee is required. For example,the boat launch parking lot at Miller Park was full during the recent baseball tournament and other parking lots that served the playground,picnic areas,etc. could easily be filled before the parking lots where a fee is charged. One alternative to charging for parking is to charge an admission fee. This is easily controlled at the "pinwheel"softball field complex because the entire complex is surrounded by a fence with limited access at the gates. This is also easy to do at the baseball field at Miller Park; however, it is more difficult to do at the three other baseball fields at Miller Park and would be almost impossible to do at the Soccer fields without constructing fences around the entire soccer field complex. RECOMMENDATION: The Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission should discuss the pros and cons of these issues with representatives from youth baseball, youth softball, youth soccer and football prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council should decide on a policy on whether or not to allow groups to charge for either parking or admissions within certain facilities. If charging is allowed there should be requirements regarding how traffic will be controlled and who will control it. There should also be some decision made on who can put up temporary fence for the purpose of controlling access within City parks and who should pay for the setup and take down of the fencing. BL:mdd Attachments: July 15, 1996 PRNRC Unapproved Minutes July 15 Letter from Dick Berg ParkFee/Bob96 1 ::. :.3 :'7.. , eclen Q / prairie '% aseball as ° ation 16526 W. 78th St., #326 , Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Date: July 15, 1996 To: Eden Prairie Parks Commission From: Dick Berg, President Eden Prairie Baseball Association Prior commitments prevent me from attending your meeting tonight so I will write a few comments on your agenda items. 1. Fee for use of lights at baseball Fields - We would have no problem paying a reasonable fee to cover electrical expenses from use of lights and or scoreboards at baseball games. These fees should be comparable to fees charged any other organization using park facilities. 2. Parking fees for tournaments - Hosting tournaments provides our players with an opportunity to play a tournament without incurring the inconvenience of traveling to Apple Valley, Forest Lake, or who knows where. We ar also very proud of our outstanding Miller Park Complex and love showing it off to residents of other communities. We also know the tremendous amount of work required to host a tournament and believe if a tournament can be a fund raiser we can use these profits to help reduce the cost of playing baseball. Hosting an invitational tournament such as the June 7-9 tournament, team entry fees are used to cover our expenses and provide us with a small profit. Team fees collected for state tournaments go to the sponsoring organization (AAU, Babe Ruth Baseball, etc..) and we have charged spectators a fee to attend the tournament. With field access to the baseball fields not conducive to a walk up type of collection we thought charging by the carload would best serve our needs. We erroneously made this decision without consulting the city or the police and maybe it was not the best way to accomplish our.goal. 2 We are willing to work with the city and or police in the future to best host a tournament without causing undue strain on the regular Miller Park Traffic. We are thankful for a premier baseball park (Miller Park) and outstanding service from the city and all of its staff. We consider this a partnership and are more than willing to do our part. THANK YOU Dick Berg President, Eden Prairie Baseball Association 3 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 MOTION: Jacobson moved,seconded by Koenig, to continue this until the next meeting and direct Staff to come back with an hourly rate. Motion carried 6-0. B. Recommendation for Policy on Allowing Non Profit Groups to Charge for Par ing or Admission to Tournaments in Parks Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated June 25, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities. Lambert commented that Staffs recommendation is not to allow groups to charge for parking and allow groups to charge admission to their events. Charging for parking in public parks raises lots of issues. Someone would collect money for admission and give out tickets or stamp hands. Ken Bomben, Eden Prairie Soccer Association, commented that the Soccer Association is only partially effected by either one of these recommendations. They don't sponsor tournaments. They do make use of the City providing services and do use a little power at the concession stands. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Wilson, to accept the City's recommendation in the memo of June 25, 1996 regarding a policy allowing non profit groups to charge for parking or admission to tournaments. Motion carried 6-0. C. Discussion About Staring Lake Trash Cans Koenig commented she walks her dog around Staring Lake and other dog owners have expressed a desire to have more trash cans for disposal of dog waste. There is no trash can by the grill near the lake. There should be trash cans everywhere there are picnic tables. Lambert noted he will check on the lake site situation because there should be one. He doesn't believe they will put more trash cans around the park for dog waste. DNR took out the trash cans from the public access because the access stays cleaner without them. People were putting in dead fish and throwing stuff near the trash cans. All the public accesses have become cleaner as a result of this. Koenig also commented about the dangers of the skaters going so fast around the park and knocking people over. Lambert suggested walking in the opposite direction of the skaters so you can see them coming. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8/6/96 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. rV k. DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request to Expand Current Youth Scholarship Recreation and Facilities Program to Include Open Skate,Etc. Robert A. Lambert Attached to this memorandum is a memo from Lyndell Frey requesting expansion of the current youth scholarship program to include open swimming,skating, and open gym. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request to expand the current scholarship program as per the attached memo. A copy of the July 15, 1996 unapproved minutes from the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission is attached. Attachments: Memo from Lyndell Frey July 15, 1996 Unapproved PRNRC Minutes Scholar/Bob96 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities DATE: July 2, 1996 SUBJECT: Request to Expand Current Youth Scholarship Program to Include Open Skating, Open Swimming, and the Open Gym Program to Families Who Currently Quality for the Youth Scholarship Program The Parks, Recreation and Facilities Department received a request for families who currently qualify for the youth scholarship program to also receive free use of the open swimming, skating, and open gym times conducted through the City. It is staffs recommendation that we allow families who currently qualify for the scholarship program to receive these "open" recreational times at no charge. Although, there will not be an additional direct cost associated with these times (paid staff already on duty), it is suggested that we monitor the use of the scholarship program for open swimming, skating and the open gym program for one year, then allow the Parks Commission and City Council to review the information to consider the program on an ongoing basis. It is recommended that families who wish to use this program fill out the standard scholarship form with each family member's name, signature and date of birth. Each time an individual would like to participate in open swimming, skating or open gym program, they would then sign in with the front desk at each location. A list of each of the current scholarship recipients will be kept updated at each of the registration sites. If approved by the Parks Commission and City Council, this expanded scholarship program would begin August 1, 1996, with the review date proposed for August 1, 1997. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. LF:mdd cc: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services Elyce Kastigar, Community Center Manager Scholar/Lyndell96 2 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 D. Discussion About Round Lake Trash Cans Around the Fishing Pier Brown commented there needs to be clean-up around the fishing pier. There are all kinds of papers,plastic cups, and other garbage. He said it may have been from the 4th of July celebration. • Lambert indicated that the park was spic and span by 10 a.m.on July 5, and he will direct staff to clean that area. (Commissioner Kracum was excused at 9:40 p.m.) VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Reports of Manager of Recreation Services I. Recommendation to Expand Youth Scholarship Program to Include Open Skating.Open Swimming,and Open Gym Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 2, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities. Lambert noted Staffs recommendation is to allow families who currently qualify for the scholarship program to receive these "open" recreational times at no charge. It was suggested that they monitor the use of the scholarship program for one year,then allow the Parks Commission and City Council to review the information to consider the program on an ongoing basis. Each time an individual would participate, they would then sign in with the front desk at each location. A list of each of the current scholarship recipients will be kept updated at each of the registration sites. Hilgeman asked how long will the recipients be eligible for this. Lambert replied for the year. Jacobson suggested issuing passes. Lambert noted that is not feasible because the kids will give the passes to other kids to use. The kids will sign and the signatures will be on file for comparison when they arrive. • MOTION: Koenig moved, seconded by Wilson, to approve the Staff recommendation of July 2, 1996 regarding request to expand 3 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 current youth scholarship program to include open skating, open swimming, and the open gym program to families who currently qualify for the youth scholarship program. Motion carried 6-0. B. Reportof Community Center Manager • 1. Request from Team Minnesota for Annual Hockey Festival Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 10, 1996, from Joel Klute, Ice Arena and Concessions Coordinator. Lambert indicated Team Minnesota is requesting cancellation of open skate times for the dates of July 19, 20 (daytime only), 21, 26, 27, and 28 for their annual hockey festival. Hilgeman asked if there have been any complaints. Lambert replied no. MOTION: Brown moved, seconded by Wilson, to approve Staffs recommendation to cancel open skating for the annual hockey tournament. Motion carried 6-0. Brown was concerned that he read an article in the newspaper that said Norwest Bank spent$10,000 for fireworks and the City matched it, and it cost the City an additional $55,000 for the 4th of July celebration. Lambert noted the City spent about $30,000 for everything including police overtime, cleanup, etc. IX. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Jacobson, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. LI EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8/6/96 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. J- DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Approve Bid to Begin Energy Management System Recreation and Facilitie Barbara Penning Cross RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends awarding a contract to Control Services for$241,235.00 to furnish and install the energy management system and lighting upgrade for the Eden Prairie City Center. BACKGROUND: The Facility Staff prepared an energy management plan for the Eden Prairie City Center. The plan identified twenty-three energy saving projects including; • Adding the entire building to the energy management system • Modifying software to allow separate zones for heat and lights within the building • Providing software for load shedding capabilities • Utilizing energy efficient lighting throughout the building • Use of energy efficient motors The N/Sponsored program is structured to implement energy conservation measures using an interest free loan to make the improvements. All costs associated with the energy management plan, including the implementation of the system, are part of the NSP program. The energy savings will pay back the loan amount eliminating any up front costs for the City. The payback time of the loan will be slightly less than four years at which time the City will realize the$62,600 per year in savings. In March,the City Council authorized staff to proceed with NSP and to advertise for bidders to complete the work. Staff worked with the consulting engineer to write specifications, draw plans and advertise for bids. Bids were opened July 2, 1996. One bid was received from Control Services in the amount of $241,235.00. Control Services was the control contractor for the building when it was remodeled in 1993 and still are the computer automation consultants for the City Center. Many energy management improvements were included in the original contract to remodel this building. Due to budget constraints, the improvements were cut. The prices for the original work are very similar to the bids the City received for this contract. Staff is confident the bid is competitive and recommends Control Services to do the work. 1 tti�y ME2, Inc. u�"° =` Consulting g '' $ ".{ t,�,-;� 4� ,e 1117 East Franklin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 M£ Phone(812)871-3388 Fax(812) 871-1748 a ry,�, h- F YE k;.4 K'N � ' t ; x4 Letter To: , > ► Barb Cross �` ' City of Eden Prairie g' * 8080 Mitchell Road A;' `;; Eden Prairie,MN • r , `' RE: Eden Prairie City Center 2,t, ..`� � _4� EMS and Lighting Upgrade ,t x { MEE Project No. 94066 ` Dear Barb:#' 14. 4 < . 'fie;' The bids were received for the EMS and lighting upgrade and came within the estimated budget of .'- ' ' ' ' $256,000.00. The single bid of$242.00 submitted by Control Services,Inc.of Roseville,MN. .L ' ^,A L Control Services,Inc.was the control contractor for the City Center remodeling in 1993 and 1994. 40< .• w*4g, They are very familiar with the building and worked closely with myself on the original report. . Many of the costs established in the report were a result of collaboration with Control Services, ;.Y '', Inc.to establish reasonable and realistic costs.. Based on the above, I fell the costs submitted were " • :, k-7- reasonable and competitive. *• e. ,1r r _ I would recommend that the bid be accepted and feel that Control Services,Inc.will do an - + 1 •h. excellent job for the City of Eden Prairie. 3x�rd r, 4-- + '�'� � Sincerely, } k W t- . '),/ it ''` 254 , P Dan Moulton 1? ; i(L� p'i doc.94066dm2 .i N1.a M 2 � tl EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING & UPGRADE BID ITEM NO. 1 PROVIDE LIGHTING/PHOTOCELL CONTROLS FOR THE CITY HALL ATRIUM LIGHTING. 1. Lump sum cost $ 4,890.00 IBID ITEM NO.Four2 Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety and No/100 Dollars PROVIDE LIGHTING AND PHOTOCELL CONTROLS FOR C.H. ROBINSON ATRIUM. • 1. Lump sum cost $ 3,270.00 Three Thousand Two Hundred Seventy and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO.3 NOT USED I BID ITEM NO.4 111 PROVIDE RELAMPING AND REBALLASTING OF EXISTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTS. 11 1. Lump Sum Cost for all work: $ 27,430.00 Twenty Seven Thousand Four Hundred Thirty and No/100 Dollars IUNIT PRICES: By Component 1. Replace lamps and ballasts for(1)type"A"fixture-24"x 48"parabolic air handling fixture with one discreet electronic 3 lamp ballast and(3)F-32,T-8 lamps: 1. $ 12.32 ea. 2. Replace lamps and ballasts for (1) Type "B" fixture - 20" x 48" parabolic 3 lamp fixture with one discreet electronic 3 lamp ballast and (3) F-32, T-8 I lamps. 3. Replace lamps and ballasts for(1) 8 foot, Slim line, 2 lamp fixture with 2• $ 12.32 ea. one discreet electronic ballast and(2)8 ft.,F-32,T-8 lamps. 4. Replace lamps and ballasts for(1)4 foot, 2 lamp wrap around with one discreet electronic ballast and(2)4 FT.,F-32,T-8 lamps. 3. $ 17.16 ea. 5. Replace lamps and ballasts for(1)4 foot, 1 lamp strip with one discreet 111 electronic ballast and(1)4 foot,F-32,T-8 lamp. 6. Replace lamps and ballasts for(1)2 lamp, 1 x 4 fixture with one discreet 4' $ 12.32, ea. electronic ballast and(2)F-32,F-8 lamps. 7. Provide one new 8 foot tandem fixture with one discreet ballast and with (4)F-32,T-8 lamps. . $ 10.56 ea. BID ITEM NO.5 6. $ 12.32 ea. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY SENSORS TO ACTIVATE HEAT PUMPS AND LIGHTS 7' $ 40.22 ea. (Avg. ) IN THE HERITAGE ROOMS. 12 3 I EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING&UPGRADE II 1. Lump sum cost 1111 - Three Thousand Six Hundred Ninety and No/100 Dollars $ 3,690_ffl BID ITEM NO.6 1111 PROVIDE CAPACITORS ON' EAST END AND WEST END ELECTRIC SERVICES. $ 5,420.00 I 1. Lump sum cost Five Thousand Four Hundred Twenty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO.7 1111 ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EMS) CONTROL OF EXISTING HEAT PUMPS NOT ALREADY ON EMS. 1. Lump Sum for 93 Heat Pumps $ 92,200.00 Ninety Two Thousand Two Hundred and No/100 Dollars 1111 UNIT PRICE: 1. EMS control of(1)existing heat pump not presently on the EMS. $ 950.00 Ea. IIIINine8 Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars Each. BID ITEM NO. III PROVIDE ENERGY EFFICIENT MOTORS ON THE EAST END CORE LOOP HEAT PUMPS. $ 3,750.00 II1. Lump sum cost Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO.9 UPROVIDE ENERGY EFFICIENT MOTOR ON THE WEST END MAKE-UP AIR UNIT. II1. Lump sum cost One Thousand Seventy and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 10 $ 1,070.00 CONTROL OF EAST FLUID COOLERS AND EAST CORE LOOP PUMPS BY THE EMS SYSTEM. 1. Lump sum cost IIISix Thousand Eighty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 11 $ 6,Q80.00 Ill PROVIDE SOFTWARE FOR LOAD SHEDDING CAPABILITY BY THE EMS. II 1. Lump sum cost Ten Thousand Nine Hundred Ten and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 12 ril • $ 10,910.00 13 II y EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING&UPGRADE PROVIDE ZONED LIGHTING AND HEAT PUMP CONTROL IN THE C.H. ROBINSON AREA. 1 1. Lump sum cost Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 13 $ 18,700.00 PROVIDE ENERGY EFFICIENT MOTORS ON THE EAST END MAKE-UP AIR 111 UNITS. 1. .Lump sum cost One Thousand Sixty Five and No/100 Dollars IBID ITEM NO. 14 $ 1,065.00 PROVIDE FOR EMS CONTROL OF EAST END MAKE-UP AIR UNITS. 1. Lump sum cost Three Thousand Three Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 15 PROVIDE EMS CONTROL OF LIGHTS IN THE DINING ROOM AND CITY ITRAINING ROOM. $ 3,350.00 1. Lump sum cost 11 BID ITEM NO.Six16 Thousand Seven Hundred Forty and No/100 Dollars PROVIDE EMS CONTROL OF TRACK LIGHTING IN EAST END LOWER LEVEL CORRIDOR $ 6,740.00 1. Lump sum cost Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 17 $ 7,780.00 PROVIDE EMS AND PHOTOCELL CONTROL OF LIGHTS IN THE CITY HALL MAIN ENTRANCE. 1. Lump sum cost 11111 BID ITEM NO. Two Thousand Three Hundred Twenty and No/100 Dollars 18 $ 2,320.00 I PROVIDE EMS CONTROL OF MISCELLANEOUS POINTS INCLUDING PUMPS, COMPRESSOR AND VALVES. 1. Lump sum cost Four Thousand Six Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO. 19 $ 4,650.00 I EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING&UPGRADE PROVIDE PROGRAMMING IN EMS FOR TIME CLOCK CONTROL WITH INDIVIDUAL SCHEDULING OF EACH HEAT PUMP. $ 13,770.00 1. Lump sum cost Thirteen Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy and No/100 Dollars 11 BID ITEM NO.20 PROVIDE PROGRAMMING OF EMS TO ALLOW INDIVIDUAL TIME 20. $ 870.00 SCHEDULING OF EACH AREA LIGHTING AND HEAT PUMP ZONE OVERRIDE IN THE CITY AREA. 1. Lump sum cost Eight Hundred Seventy and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO.21 $ 4,560.00 1111 PROVIDE PROGRAMMING TO PROVIDE SEPARATE OVERRIDE BUTTONS FOR LIGHTING AND HEAT PUMPS IN THE CITY AREA. 1. Lump sum cost Four Thousand Five Hundred Sixty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO.22 $ 18,720.00 PROVIDE NEW SOFTWARE SYSTEM IN EXISTING EMS. 1. Lump sum cost Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty and No/100 Dollars BID ITEM NO.23 1111 PROVIDE A HARD WIRED CONNECTION TO EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE WHEN MODULAR CONNECTION HAS BEEN INTERRUPTED. 23. $ 18.15 ea. Eighteen and 15/100 Dollars Each. TOTAL FOR BID ITEMS NO. 1 - 22 Two Hundred Forty One Thousand Two Hundred Thirty Five and No/100 Dollars $ 241,235.0 I I 1 • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING&UPGRADE Unit Prices: 1. Provide one hard wired connection to existing light fixture in lieu of the existing modular connection. 1111 BIDDER Control Services of Minnesota, Inc. by Paul Riihiluoma 4gnat re I itAL-6°A4-/ s Sales Engineer Address: 2021 West County Road C Roseville MN 55113-1305 I Type ofhusiness entity: Corporation (oorpor an.individual psa+Qsh+p) 2nd July dated this day of J ly , 19 96 Addenda Received: #1, dated June 25, 1996 #2, .dated June 27, 1996 111 I I I I I EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING &UPGRADE SECTION 00440(PRIVATE } SUBCONTRACT LISTING TO: QTYOF EDEN PRAIRIE hereinafter called"Owner" 1. Pursuant to bidding requirements for the Work titled: The Contract Sum proposed by the undersigned on the bid form is for the Work as shown on the Drawings,described in the Specifications,and otherwise defined in the Contract Documents. However, the undersigned proposes the following subcontractors for the Owner's consideration. Should the Owner accept any or all of the proposed subcontractors,the bidder's proposed Contract Sum will be as shown. 2. Mechanical Subcontractor Electrical Subcontractor List Other Subcontractors Energy Solutions International, Inc. PROVIDE SIGNATURE(BIDDER IDENTICAL TO THAT SHOWN ON THE BID FORM: By Paul Riihiluoma, Sales Engineer U 1111 I 0 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER EMS LIGHTING&UPGRADE SECTION 00445 SUBSTITUTIONS TO: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE hereinafter called"Owner" 1. Pursuant to bidding requirements for the Work titled: The Contract Sum proposed by the undersigned on the bid form is for the Work as shown on the Drawings,described in the Specifications,and otherwise defined in the Contract Documents. However, the undersigned proposes the following substitutions for the Owner's consideration. Should the Owner . accept any or all of the proposed substitutions,the bidder's proposed Contract Sum will be reduced by the amount shown. 2. Specified Drawing Proposed Product Number Reduction or or Spec Proposed in Contract Material: Section: Substitution: Sum: i I • 11111 11 PROVIDE SIGNATURE(BIDDER IDENTICAL TO THAT SHOWN ON THE BID FORM: g By I M 9 DATE: 08/06/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: 1V K. SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Minnesota Tree Third Addition Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Minnesota Tree Third Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$293 Background: This proposal consists of a two lot subdivision of 2.93 acres located south of Valley View Road and east of Prairie Center Drive. Lot 2 is the current site of the Valley Sports and Travel building and Lot 1 will be subject to future development. The preliminary plat was approved July 6, 1993. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed September 21, 1993. JJ:ssa cc: Walt Carpenter CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MINNESOTA TREE THIRD ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Minnesota Tree Third Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Minnesota Tree Third Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated July 24, 1996. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdivision of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2 _ 1 ci F: 2 3 . S g •••1 01 4 f w I 2 w • 4 -3 '- II I eh : .../( ; 4 I: I) Z C.h;C.'2. I• I I 0 N3C3 s:1 ... 1,-• --‘'''-......itie=1 _- ,• / ': .... -11 ."'• -- .-'V.:• •;49, I.; (.1 ,...pc. .... O \ 7 . < , \ .., ___,...-- --...-= ,... . ...,,, !i; cy 1-1 :J.; \.-- .... CC 12 I— \ • ...,,It -------:. 3 Il . \ 0 ,vlik 1. '''' _._-- „ ...., t , t 7 r• Wr -11'''' ".:: —;;',.. _I• LIJ \ ...:, ,s .., CC 0 II-• — fit • i ,..r— \ I ,..k. ,.• :I . g V \ \. 0.... ri Z Z C, CA III .../ CO )I I• MI \ \ ..,1.... ZX 7' '. , ....,IIIIIII- I \ ICI. Z \ V?, ../.. ...'.." •* I 11 ??. N \ -., , .., :. 1 tv, \ ,A -,.,..- \ :II .., .,-,- \ - 0 ,,,,"r. ..., \ 1-, ..-:.,,\ \\ ____::„. _---•,.....----: ,e 21._ ';;)''' !: :I 2 \ ...), v‘\\ ,,, ,„ i. •:1 ';;\ \ ,, • \ \ • ".....f. 4. voi 0 . 3 . -...& . DATE: 08/06/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: L SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 93-5311 Engineering Division Award Contract for DellRoad Construction Alan Gray Recommended Action: Approve resolution awarding contract to Hardrives, Inc. for I.C. 93-5311, Dell Road Construction from 3972 feet north of CSAH 1 to W.B. 212 ramp. Overview: This project will complete the construction of Dell Road between TH5 and CSAH 1. This project is now able to proceed with the acquisition by MnDOT by the "Gilk property". It is desirable to proceed with this segment of Dell Road construction in advance of Hennepin County's reconstruction of CSAH 4. This will result in Dell Road being available as a north/south connection between Trunk Highway 5 and CSAH 1 during the reconstruction of CSAH 4. Financial Issues: This project has been approved by MnDOT State Aid and will be funded with State Aid funds. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 93-5311 Dell Road from 3972 Feet North of CSAH 1 to W.B. 212 Ramp bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to HARDRIVES, INC. as the lowest bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with Hardrives, Inc. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $747,325.85 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2- • • SUMMARY OF BIDS I.C. 93-5311 DESCRIPTION: • Dell Road BIDS OPENED: July 18, 1996 CONSULTING ENGINEER: SRF Consulting Group, Inc. CHECKED BY: SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Bidder Bid Security Total Amount Hardrives, Inc. 5% $ 747,325.85 Valley Paving, Inc. 5% $ 757,958.23 Ryan Contracting, Inc. 5% $ 860,153.05 C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. 5% $1,113,713.26 The undersigned recommend award of Contract to: Hardrives, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder for this Improvement Contract. /01'4) /471Iit SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Alan D. Gray, P.E., Cityingieeer U 3 DATE: 08/06/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: / I V►. SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: rrEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 93-5311 Engineering Division Resolution Prohibiting Parking on a Segment of Dell Road Alan Gray Recommended Action: Approve resolution prohibiting parking on Dell Road between 3972 feet north of CSAH 1 and W.B. 212 ramp. Overview: This segment of Dell Road is designed for four traffic lanes with a median and no parking lanes. State Aid funds will be utilized for the construction. State Aid rules require that the City adopt a resolution prohibiting parking when parking lanes are not incorporated in the design. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROHIBITING PARKING ON DELL ROAD I.C. 93-5311 WHEREAS, the City Engineer, with the assistance of SRF, Inc., has prepared plans for the construction of Dell Road between 3972 feet north of CSAH 1 and W.B. TH212 ramp; WHEREAS, this segment of Dell Road will not include parking lanes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that parking is prohibited on Dell Road from 3972 feet north of CSAH 1 to W.B. 212 ramp. The City of Eden Prairie will provide enforcement of the parking prohibition. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2- • PR . Consulting Group , Inc . Transportation • Civil • Structural • Environmental ■ Planning • Traffic ■ Landscape Architecture • Parking SRF No. 0931797 July 22, 1996 • Mr. Alan Gray, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: DELL ROAD STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EDEN PRAIRIE I.C. 93-5311 SAP 181-113-04 Dear Mr. Gray: Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 18, 1996 for the above referenced project. The bids received for the project are shown on the attached Summary of Bids. The Engineer's Estimate for Dell Road was $740,024.50. The low bid, submitted by Hardrives, Inc. was $747,325.85. We recommend that the City Council award Improvement Contract No. 93-5311 to Hardrives, Inc. for the total amount of $747,325.85. Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1atL-�. thew D. Hansen, P.E. , Senior Engineer tt-14 ' , 1' " R. Dvorak, P.E. enior Associate JRD/MDH/smf Attachments SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447-4443 Telephone (612) 475-0010 • Fax (612) 475-2429 An Equal Opportunity Employer 3 DATE: 08/06/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: T I V SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Agreement Regarding Special Assessments and Resolution of Abatement of Special Assessments for Lot 3, Block 2, Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition Recommended Action: Adopt Special Assessment Agreement regarding Lot 3, Block 2, Maple Leaf 9th Addition, agreeing to a reassessment of $19,000 for street and utility improvements and Resolution of Abatement for Special Assessments. Overview: Lot 3, Block 2, Maple leaf Acres is located on the south side of Valley View Road three lots easterly of Dell Road. The lot faces north and fronts on Valley View Road. It is just one of three single family lots platted along the south side of Valley View Road easterly of Dell Road. The depth of the lot is limited by a wetland/storm water detention pond. Soil borings indicate a necessity for soil correction to construct an adequate foundation for a single family home in the building pad area of this lot. There are currently $54,835.30 in unpaid principal and interest from special assessments levied in 1973 and 1982. The lot is tax forfeit and is being purchased by a builder for the construction of a new single family home. Financial Issues: Upon purchase of the lot for building purposes the City may reassess the lot for utility and street improvements. The City will receive $5,000 of the purchase price paid to Hennepin County for the lot. It is proposed to reassess an additional $19,000, bringing the total amount recovered for street and utility improvements to $24,000. This amount is consistent with the amount of assessments recovered in other similar tax forfeit lots with poor soil conditions. e CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 96- WHEREAS, Owner holds an interest in property described as : Lot 3 , Block 2, Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which property is the subject of this Agreement and is hereinafter referred to as the "Property, " and WHEREAS, the Property is subject to certain tax forfeiture proceedings, and WHEREAS, Owner' s interest in the Property is as purchaser pursuant to a contract for purchase from State of Minnesota, as Trustee; Hennepin County, on behalf of the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the Property has been previously specially assessed for sewer, water and street improvements ( "Improvements" ) , which special assessments have been cancelled because of the tax forfeiture proceedings, and WHEREAS, City has reassessed the Property for the Improvements in the amounts of unpaid special assessments, and WHEREAS, the Property would have little or no economic value if it were burdened with reassessments in such amounts, and the Council deems it appropriate in order to capture a portion of the special reassessments to abate a portion of the special reassessments so as to provide incentive for return of the Property to the tax rolls and the development and utilization of the Property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: That the Council hereby approves the abatement of the special reassessments relating to sanitary sewer, water and street improvements against Lot 3 , Block 2 , Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, further identified as PID 07-116-22-21-00-38, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §375 . 192, by reducing the reassessments in accordance with the following amounts and terms : PAYABLE IN PER NUMBER ANNUM ANNUAL INTEREST YEAR AMOUNT INSTALLMENTS RATE 05623A LAT SEW AND WATER 59 1973 - 0 - -05627A SEW & WATER TRUNK 58 1973 - 0 - - - 08349A 51-325 UTIL/STR/STM 1982 19,000.00 20 8.5% 2 s IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows : N 1 . Owner consents to the levying of a reassessment against the Property for the Improvements in the following amounts payable in equal annual. installments, together with interest thereon at the rates per annum as follows : PER NUMBER ANNUM ANNUAL INTEREST YEAR AMOUNT INSTALLMENTS RATE 05623A LAT SEW AND WATER 59 1973 - 0 - - - 05627A SEW & WATER TRUNK 58 1973 - 0 - - - 08349A 51-325 UTIL/STR/STM 1982 19,000.00 20 8.5% 2 . Owner waives notice of, and the holding of, any assessment hearing for the purpose of considering and adopting, and levying the reassessment by the City Council . 3 . Owner concurs that the benefit to the Property by virtue of the Improvements which have been constructed exceeds the amount of the original assessment and reassessment against the Property. Owner waives all rights it has by virtue of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429 . 061, 429 . 081 or otherwise to challenge the amount or validity of the reassessment, or the procedures used by the City in apportioning the Original Assessment and hereby releases the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all liability related to or arising out of the imposition or levying of the reassessment . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By Jean L. Harris, Mayor By Carl J. Jullie, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 1996 by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Eden Prairie. Notary Public J AGREEMENT REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of this day of , 1996 by and between the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "City" ) , and Northwest Construction Services, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation ( "Owner" ) . A. Owner holds an interest in property described as : Lot 3 , Block 2 , Maple Leaf Acres 9th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which property is the subject of this Agreement and is hereinafter referred to as the "Property" . B. The Property is subject to certain tax forfeiture proceedings . C. Owner' s interest in the Property is as purchaser pursuant to a contract for purchase from State of Minnesota, as Trustee; Hennepin County, on behalf of the State of Minnesota. D. The Property has been previously specially assessed for sewer, water and street improvements (the "Improvements" ) in the following amounts ( "Original Assessments" ) , which are unpaid in the following amounts, and which special assessments have been or will be cancelled because of the tax forfeiture proceedings : UNPAID AMTS. YEAR TM RATE TOTAL P & I 05623A LAT SEW AND WATER 59 1973 20 6 . 6000 149 . 03 163.13 05627A SEW & WATER TRUNK 58 1973 20 6 . 6000 584 . 67 640.12 08349A 51-325 UTIL/STR/STM 1982 17 12 . 0000 19297 .15 54,032.05 E. Upon return of the property to private ownership, City proposes to reassess the Property, pursuant to M.S . §429 . 071, Subd. 4, for such improvements in amounts equal to the amounts remaining unpaid on the Original Assessments against the Property. `I NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. • By Mark Radbourne Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 1996 by Mark Radbourne, the owner of Northwest Construction Services, Inc. , a Minnesota corporation. Notary Public C:\wp51\rap\ep\spec-as-ag.nw C ADOPTED by the City Council on the day of 1996 . Jean L. Harris, Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk DATE: 08/06/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: IV,O, SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5311 Engineering Division Approve Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for Construction of Dell Road Alan Gray through TH212 Right-of-Way Recommended Action: Approve the Limited Use Permit with MnDOT for the construction of Dell Road through TH212 right-of-way. Overview: MnDOT requires the City enter into a Limited Use Permit to construct Dell Road through the TH212 right-of-way. The terms of the Limited Use Permit are consistent with MnDOT policies for these type of facilities. r SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017; 7-30-96 : 15:18 ; 61277728354 612 949 8326;4 5 • S.P. 2762 (212-260) 901 Parcel 10 City of Eden Prairie - Dell Road Dell Road - Engineers Sta. 444+00 to 465+00 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LIMITED USE PERMIT In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sec. 161.434, a Limited Use Permit is granted to the City of Eden Prairie , hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant", for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and operating a city street (Dell Road) within the State of Minnesota Department of Transportation's, hereinafter referred to as the "State" or the "Minnesota Department of Transportation", right of way as shown in green on Exhibit "A" which is attached and incorporated as a part of this permit. In addition, the following special provisions shall apply: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. The construction, maintenance, and operation of the city street will be at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2. Before construction of any kind, the plans and specifications for such construction shall be approved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, through the Division Engineer of the Metro Division. 3. No advertising devices in any form or size shall be constructed, placed or permitted to be constructed or placed upon the State's right of way. 5. No commercial activities shall be allowed on State's right of way. 6. All maintenance of the city shall be provided by the Applicant; this includes the installation and removal of regulatory signs, and the enforcement relating to the safe and proper utilization of the city street. 7. This permit is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited to public utilities which may occupy the State's right of way. 8. The Applicant will preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this permit at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 9. The Applicant shall construct the city street at the location shown on the attached Exhibit "A" subject to verification by the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Division Engineer of the Metro Division that the construction geometrics and procedures are compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the T.H. 212 highway facility. 10. The Applicant shall notify Bill Warden, Roadway Regulations Supervisor, at (612) 582-1443, seven (7) days prior to starting of its operations. Page 1 of 4 2 EL SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017: 7-30-96 : 15:18 6127772835' 612 949 8326:# 6 S.P. 2762 (212-260) 901 Parcel 10 City of Eden Prairie - Dell Road Dell Road - Engineers Sta. 444+000 to 465+00 11. The Applicant upon completion of the construction shall restore all disturbed slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and esthetics are perpetuated. The Applicant shall sod all slopes steeper than 3:1. The Applicant shall guarantee the growth of all seed or sod on all disturbed areas for a period of one year commencing on the last day of construction. 12. This permit does not release the Applicant from any liability or obligation imposed by Federal Law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agencies' relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be obtained by the Applicant. 13. Any use permitted by this permit shall remain subordinate to the right of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to use the property for any other highway or transportation purpose. This permit does not grant any interest whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or waterfowl refuge facility that would become subject to Section 4 (f) of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968. 14. This permit shall be subject to cancellation and termination by the Minnesota Department of Transportation for any other highway or transportation purpose, by giving the Applicant 60 days written notice of such action. Upon cancellation, any relocation of the city street will be performed by the Applicant at the sole expense of the Applicant. 15. The Applicant will hold harmless and indemnify the State, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees from claims for damages because of bodily injury, death, property damage, sickness, disease, or loss and expense arising from the Applicant's operations or its successors and assigns from the Applicant's use of the portion of highway right of way over which this permit is granted. 16. The Applicant will hold harmless and indemnify the State, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees from claims for damages because of bodily injury, death, property damage, sickness, disease, or loss and expense arising from any and all public use of the city street. 17. The Applicant will hold harmless and indemnify the State, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees from claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in flood damage. Page 2 of 4 SENT BY; XEROX Telecopier 7017; 7-30-96 ; 15;16 ; 61277728354 612 949 83264 2 S.P. 2762 (212=260) 901 1 Parcel 10 City of Eden Prairie - Dell Road Dell Road - Engineers Sta. 444+00 to 465+00 18. The Applicant shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any container on the State's right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the Applicant shall provide for cleanup of the spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Applicant. 19. The Applicant (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen, and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers', mechanics', or materialmen' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for, through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any amendment or supplement thereto; agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the State from all such liens and claims. 20. The Applicant shall not request or receive wetland Banking Credits for the creation of said city street upon the State's right of way. 21. The relocation and/or removal and reconstruction of the Applicant's water main or any other utilities necessary for the construction T.H. 212 located on land covered by this permit shall be at no expense to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. • Page 3 of 4 SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017; 7-30-96 : 15:16 ; 6127772835-6 612 949 8326:i: 3 • S.P. 2762 (212-260) 901 Parcel 10 City of Eden Prairie - Dell Road Dell Road - Engineers Sta. 444+00 to 465+00 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: By: Metro Division Engineer Its: Date Date APPROVED BY: By: Its: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BLDG. Date ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155 By: Director, Office of Right of Way and Surveys Date The Commissioner of Transportation • by the execution of this permit certifies that this permit is necessary in the public interest and that the use intended is for public purposes. Page 4 of 4 SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017; 7-30 96 ; 15:17 ; 6127772635-' 612 949 6326:# 4 1 1 1 i 1 ...10.1 3 ._ ••-5 46.39'97" E - 13 5.3e•.... •• .. I r . 10 ;j \ 10 N_ 1 crr • • \ I • '4 TT \\ en j r mg 1 of \°18\ 1 r : / l W.-. k . \ `:‘, , V.—,-...---‘\ ,.,, `‘,\ ,, ../ , it 61_46.39'48k tyll:feer , \ .1;.. , \ G*.54' 1 1 N. 111:331111r1°N2111k i 'mop.' -..` )..),, 's ' . :As \ - • . � r.� 106l7• �:• ee ? 4:„..,....- N6662„ ss .,`\ 1 W N1 ,, . N 50.36'11• ■ • ''�� N 0.wr le,.le KINI OUTLOT A • 19i?'15• r , 3 .1 to • `.,� to JACOIlliphaal N 27•46'00' E Imo` •-••5 16840'34" E ..- �., �� - 1332.53• .. �111000 -..—. . DATE: 08/06/96 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: .1 J p, SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Approve Subdivision and Resolution Accepting Gift of Real Property from Alan Gray Richard N. and Sharon E. Miller Recommended Action: Approve resolution accepting gift of real property from Richard N. and Sharon E. Miller. Overview: Richard N. and Sharon E. Miller wish to gift to the City of Eden Prairie two parcels of property located in Section 15. The parcels to be gifted are consistent with the parcels shown on the attached preliminary plat of Mitchell Village and designated as Outlot B and Outlot D of the proposed plat. These two parcels of property are now a part of a larger parcel which comprises the entire preliminary plat of Mitchell Village as shown on the attached exhibit. The Mitchell Village project has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. This action by Council will involve approving the subdivision of the entire property to create the parcels designated as Outlot B and Outlot D on the preliminary plat by meets and bounds descriptions which are attached and designated as Tract C and Tract D respectively. Staff recommends the approval of this subdivision in accordance with Section 12.60 Subd. 2 Minor Subdivisions. Centex Homes will be platting and developing the remainder of the property in accordance with the approved preliminary plans for Mitchell Village. As owner of the parcels designated as Outlot B and Outlot D in the preliminary plat, the City may participate in the plat so that the city-owned parcels become part of platted property more properly distinguished as road right-of-way and public open space. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GIFT PROPERTY FROM RICHARD N. AND SHARON E. MILLER WHEREAS, Richard N. and Sharon E. Miller are the owners of a parcel of land in Section 15, Township 116N, Range 22W, located at the southeast corner of Mitchell Road and Anderson Lakes Parkway; and WHEREAS, Richard N. and Sharon E. Miller desire to gift to the City of Eden Prairie two segments of their property described as Tract C and Tract D on Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that be it resolved that the City Manager is authorized to accept the gift of real property from Richard N. Miller and Sharon E. Miller and to utilize the gifted property for public utilities, public street right-of-way and public open space purposes. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 6, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 EXHIBIT A • 07/24/96 9:34 AM PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TRACT C: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15,Township 116 North,Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Hennepin County.Minnesota,described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter.thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 33 seconds East,assumed bearing,along the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter,a distance of 734.00 feet to the easterly line of ATHERTON 3RD ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof,said Hennepin County;thence North 00 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds West,along said easterly line,a distance of 44.00 feet: thence North 44 degrees 17 minutes 13 seconds East,along said easterly line,a distance of 234.93 feet: thence North 00 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West,along said easterly line, a distance of 84.45 feet:thence North 45 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West,along said easterly line,a distance of 311.00 feet; thence North 13 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds West,a distance of 233.79 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East,a distance of 56.79 feet; thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 291.00 feet; thence a distance of 102 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 316.50 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve a distance of 260.00 feet;thence on a bearing of North,a distance of 16.14 feet to the actual point of beginning: thence continuing on a bearing of North,a distance of 126.36 feet: thence on a bearing of East. a distance of 270.76 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 666.20 feet. the center of circle of said curve bears South 69 degrees 14 minutes 33 seconds West from said point; thence southerly along said curve a distance of 169.53 feet. more or less, to the south line of said North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter: thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 33 seconds East,along said south line,a distance of 81.69 feet: thence northwesterly,along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest, having a central angle of 57 degrees 46 minutes 00 seconds and a radius of 944.69 feet.for an arc distance of 952.45 feet to the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. the chord of said curve bears North 44 degrees 34 minutes 49 seconds West; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 13 seconds West,along said north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter.a distance of 876.90 feet to the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter;thence South 00 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds East,along said west line,a distance of 42.00 feet to a line 42.00 feet south and parallel with said north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 13 seconds East. a distance of 575.08 feet;thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 47 seconds East.a distance of 265.00 feet:thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 13 seconds East,a distance of 189.01 feet: thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 306.05 feet: thence easterly, along a non-tangential curve concave to the south having a central angle of 70 degrees 18 minutes 32 seconds and a radius of 59.00 feet, for an arc distance of 72.40 feet, the chord of said curve bears South 80 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East: thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, tangent to said curve,a distance of 108.59 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record. Containing 321.938.0 sq. ft. or 7.391 acres. 3 EXHIBIT B 07/24/96 9:37 AM PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TRACT D: That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 116 North. Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian,Hennepin County.Minnesota, described as follows: • Commencing at the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter,thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 33 seconds East,assumed bearing,along the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter,a distance of 734.00 feet to the easterly line of ATHERTON 3RD ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof. said Hennepin County; thence North 00 degrees 13 minutes 27 seconds West, along said easterly line,a distance of 44.00 feet: thence North 44 degrees 17 minutes 13 seconds East,along said easterly line,a distance of 234.93 feet: thence North 00 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West,along said easterly line, a distance of 84.45 feet: thence North 45 degrees 42 minutes 47 seconds West.along said easterly line, a distance of 311.00 feet: thence North 13 degrees 20 minutes 00 seconds West. a distance of 233.79 feet: thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 56.79 feet: thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 291.00 feet; thence a distance of 102 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest and having a radius of 316.50 feet: thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve a distance of 260.00 feet; thence on a bearing of North,a distance of 142.50 feet: thence on a bearing of East. a distance of 270.76 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 666.20 feet. the center of circle of said curve bears South 69 degrees 14 minutes 33 seconds West from said point: thence southerly along said curve a distance of 169.53 feet, more or less, to the south line of said North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 33 seconds East,along said south line,a distance of 81.69 feet: thence northwesterly, along a non-tangential curve concave to the southwest, having a central angle of 57 degrees 46 minutes 00 seconds and a radius of 944.69 feet, for an arc distance of 952.45 feet to the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. the chord of said curve bears North 44 degrees 34 minutes 49 seconds West;thence • North 89 degrees 48 minutes 13 seconds East,along said north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and along the north line of said North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. a distance of 550.49 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 17 degrees 55 minutes 06 seconds East,a distance of 194.70 feet; thence South 65 degrees 39 minutes 57 seconds East.a distance of 61.22 feet; thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 33 seconds East. a distance of 288.24 feet; thence North 27 degrees 32 minutes 56 seconds East. a distance of 138.78 feet: thence South 62 degrees 27 minutes 04 seconds East,a distance of 156.00 feet: thence South 27 degrees 32 minutes 56 seconds West, a distance of 242.15 feet; thence South 00 degrees 12 minutes 27 seconds East.a distance of 277.21 feet to said south line of the North One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 47 minutes 33 seconds East.along said south line of the North One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. a distance of 756.36 feet to the east line of said North One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter;thence North 00 degrees 22 minutes 07 seconds West. along said east line of the North One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. a distance of 652.00 feet to said north line of the North One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 13 seconds West, along said north line of the North One-half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. a distance of 1247.59 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements. restrictions and reservations of record. Containing 566.522.4 sq. ft. or 13.006 acres. • • •;,e tresiesoa OrolooRioael&v.v..Inc 7.4,.1 rawts Wert coop., GOPHER STATE ONE CALL r...1-000-7.1:-1,63 ,_Dn.:.6.- TR., 'S•OW;$ POTEK•AL PER.AANEmi—, S...".NAU. ,ENIRA•CE r VJAILosEml;^•) I\ / ,...' - - , - -ANDERSON LAKES PARK WAY • 1 ... _ J --- -- _ -----'-- OUTt.OT F \ ' ,-. -.....". \ \ , LC 5-6 tThA•r, °'f''"''' .-5 , r.; flT1c . .1\---\ -- .....- '--.._ A , • 1 r, ';.3 — -...... ' ''. , ,. .. \ ' -- '`----. ..-5-7A.c• o; -. -.-.. -.. ' - '-, I\-,-11-', ,‘,...1 •-" • .. ," 11 I -- •t.' i _ ._1 _- -- .r-,„„,....„ / c r . . \ .. .. ..•:, , , ..?/..,..2...4--/ . • ..,1 •. •_ ,.. .... . -J 2 al.111111 . i OUTLOT A \ ss B•41,01K.----___\.. --- 33-T7. /../ '',. / • id 5E100, c...)1 ,—i 11111.11.11;I 4 IA . • EAST STREET(PRIVATE) `- . OUTLOT D •''' IS 1Z,- /5 ,/ !i.- . '..II! , '-' tz. 1: IF: '•:' OUTLOT A - - -...-.--' i .0TV:real S.C.n..;Z .E..ERARCE ...,./<<i"( '""-:\',\ 10 -1-.17:14. re_. I Ftvei-• 7 - . . `'..,Q-'' ..•- .e, \... ....13...,.....;!frr0 I ..-.. ,,... JUN .... 4. i ...... ...... . e., tP,96 4 . ... _ . • . _.,..,• -0....E... • . •e-- ' 4. .14'‘. asummi a ...::- 4 ... - SZAAGI. ENIAAP.c.E . ‘: . .'1- '• ‘' Po , upra.A.EA,r'no., . . . ,.. ., ... .‘41P/F .. \_.,,•-•"" I ee''' •• 5'CCRC 555(5/Auo ''',1 ' '. - rOUTLOT E (I) i tr..) ....---- \V ' / I. rr., • -..._____...- • ...-•-•"-----7---,-,"' . Site Data /-Z.r.r...1.2'..... I. ?,VW/ I Totrd Site t 1 1 ...-...... Z '- . , ,..ttn ‘,...... Iota,un. • f, ,.. ,.47 • • ., ..., SITE ,NEMIllf. ''"-------n.' 5:4,1 1 w.st I 1 ...,, r East ,o,,,,u,.t, ,,,,,,t 7' Building Data I ,,;,!,.174.....,,. .0.,e: q.1; • ac to7A A.rsA7,1 Ac M.o.. re, f TYPICAL LOT 0.. ...,c......• ,i 1..5 '0:Tato o.^0, t 2G 1 .., .-.te•. mo, clouwe pevoce, ‘C.n.s"I'ao:.,enct e t Car..'refifo= "at.. , co rt , . ity.c.",:not I Cr: LOCATION MAP 1-F.; .',: '- Cf:..OESMA.CIOV M/Ilitt PARCEL/C.0. an 0CD 0.4-•) Lot Z e3 ...0,. X lat• I ?.,li . 'c -' 7,riT *7 .':::.;77:,......‘:,::...:i.:::::::4:::.7:,.':; '":::i::?::4:.' .'al i ; OEL ' ec I. 1.01 7 A oc • Development Dataoc .ot 7 I OA. . Oc :` RIA-6.5 Stdards Lot S I ....‘.'..".L:;...:::-.:c.7.:r.'-'-'177",'..7:.:7,17."..,.::::......:srt;..7...10-:,..,•-•=7-`.,-........ an t.,....,c z 3,, . K,',:c tl " ,,,,, • , Igoe A I OC Are. li r 0/./, L' [ 0....,E , iii ! : 1 CZ i • ey, . ! i Roca*.wool neee. , St ; o, 1 ...a•W, cc I r .0 ,...,,,,•;:...:::::.:7:,:::::1,7::;:.4.7::-."!":,,T,' ... ..7.:.:::":,ZZ:!:.:T......?-,.,.T.7"....... I m.o..,rcro StlOaC• . floret : --.. NOTES: iz;.-.,:. , i, ; .i - •al.AREAS LIVID ARE APPROKwAlt .a. - t ,...J......_:.',....•.'F:.. ..i......,,,,, •SLIBACKS RELAK ID PUBLIC MEV Rio,ERCHI ,,,,, ,,,,,„.Ze-a-k41... • ' U.kg •SLIDACI:MN.AnDERSOAi LAKE•ARKwA,AMO .. ..,ant el Stracl... TO I tAtICKLL ROAD.25 ft. ...,.....,,,,....„ f DA MI . Mitchell LWP.U.D. Site Plan 4n04. Westwood :::.........-.:.:,........:—.:-....-.:•.:•zlz• CENTEX HOMES Village Preliminary Plat& 5.EL i I.-................ ... i . .. no.1.../...14./........ ,1 V .., ......o............. .1 awn. V CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: Consent Calendar - added on at the meeting DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Community Releasing the 1979 Developer's IV.Q Development Agreement with Ryco Development Incorporated Requested Action: Background: Form cllAcounplagn-form.wpd Rev 12/4/95 TERMINATION OF DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT This Termination of Developer' s Agreement is made and entered into as of , 1996, by and between Ryco Development Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner, " and the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City. " That certain Developer' s Agreement between the parties hereto, dated October 2 , 1979, recorded October 10 , 1979, Document No . 4511525, in the Hennepin County Recorder' s Office, is hereby terminated and each party hereby relieves the other of any liability or obligation, past or present, arising out of the Developer' s Agreement . CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jean L. Harris, Mayor Carl J. Jullie, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1996 by Jean L . Harris and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and Manager, respectively, of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public • RYCO DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED By: Its : STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1996 by , the of Ryco Development Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 96-124 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1 . That Owner, successors and assigns shall be and hereby is relieved of all obligations of Owner arising pursuant to that certain Developer' s Agreement, dated October 2 , 1979, by and between Ryco Development Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation, referred to as Owner, and by the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation, referred to as City, filed October 10 , 1979 in the Hennepin County Recorder' s Office, Document No. 4511525 . ADOPTED by the City Council on , 1996 . Jean L. Harris, Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: John D. Frane, Clerk EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V A. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger KOPESKY ADDITION Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: • Continue the Public Hearing until the August 20, 1996 City Council meeting as stated in the attached letter from the Developer. Background: This item was continued from the July 16, 1996 City Council meeting. The proponent needed additional time to resolve a drainage issue. The proponent is currently in the process of revising the plans, but will not be able to make the August 6, 1996 City Council meeting. Therefore,the proponent has asked that this item be continued to the August 20, 1996 City Council meeting when plans will be available. Notice of this continuation has been sent to the immediate surrounding neighbors. I JUL 29 '96 13:55 HTPO INC. — FAX #(612) 829-7806 P.1/1 1 7 Hansen Thorp Steven L.Pellinen,P.E. Paul A.Thorp, L.S. Laurie A.Johnson,P.E. Uoyd E.Pew,L.S. -- P Ilinen Olson Inc. Ted W.Anderson D.Daniel Thorp, L.S, Jan Wager Anderson, L.A. Dennis B. Olmstead,L.S. P Engineers•Surveyors•Landscape Architects July 29, 1996 City of Eden Prairie,MN. 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344 Attn: City Council do Jan Schneider Subj: Kopesky Addition We are hereby requesting that the public hearing for the above project be rescheduled until August 20, 1996. Thepurpose of this delayis to address off site drainageissues at the northwest corner of the project. Respectfully, HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON INC. Paul A. Thorp, L.S. PAT/ms (612)829-0700 • 7585 Office Ridge Circle • Eden Prairie, MN 56344.3644 • FAX (612)829-7806 2 City of Eden Prairie City Offices E i E r1 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 prairie Phone (612) 949-8300 • TDD (612) 949-8399 • Fax (612) 949-8390 July 30, 1996 SUBJECT: Continuance of the Kopesky Addition at the City Council Dear Resident: The proponent of the Kopesky Addition is in the process of revising his development plans and has asked for another two week continuance before review at the City Council. The project was to be reviewed at the August 6, 1996 City Council meeting. The project will now be reviewed at the City Council meeting on August 20, 1996. Please make note of this date if you are interested in attending the meeting. Since this project has already had a public hearing notice published in the Eden Prairie News, there will not be another notification of this meeting. Should you have any questions, or want to discuss the proposal, please give me a call at 949- 8489. Sincerely, C (. X-1/1 Scott A. Kipp Senior Planner 4,s r�4 Recycled Paper 3 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.U. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger SOUTHWEST CROSSING 1996 PUD CONCEPT Michael D. Franzen AMENDMENT Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment Review on 109 acres. Background: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the July 8, 1996 meeting. Southwest Crossing was a Planned Unit Development approved in 1984 for a mixture of office, commercial and industrial uses totaling approximately 1.626 million square feet. Site 16 and 17 would be combined into one site for the 90,590 square foot MEPC building with 46,410 sq. ft. transferreded Site 12. Site 18 would be eliminated and 18,000 square feet would also be transferred to Site 12. Site 12 would be amended for a 181,274 square foot corporate headquarters. The Developer is requesting approval of a tree loss and tree replacement plan for the entire Planned Unit Development . There are 14,016 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 4965 inches or 35%. This is less than the average tree loss of 40% for commercial, office and industrial projects. Tree replacement 2,311 inches. The transfer of building square footage from Site 18 to Site 12 is a benefit to the City . The office building located close to Nine Mile Creek would be eliminated and be converted to open space as part of Lot 12. The City also benefits from a 12 acre woodland preserve. Staff Recommendations The staff recommends approval. I Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment 2. Staff Report dated July 5, 1996 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated July 8, 1996 2 SOUTHWEST CROSSING 1996 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF SOUTHWEST CROSSING 1996 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT FOR BTO DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Amendment of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Southwest Crossing 1996 Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment by BTO Development and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 6, 1996; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Southwest Crossing 1996 PUD Concept Amendment, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated July 30, 1996. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 8, 1996. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of August, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 3 • Exh;b/t A LAND DESCRIPTION FOR SOUTHWEST CROSSING P.U.D. AMENDMENT OUTLOT A, KMSP PLAZA, OUTLOT B, GOLDEN STRIP EAST, LOT 1, BLOCK 3, GOLDEN STRIP EAST, all according to the recorded plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Southwest Crossing - 1996 Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: BTO Development LOCATION: Viking Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 109 acres. S ' .... i 1 ii .--: :.::: 1 .;-:•:± ..h.• 1. ;:. 1 I -- I 1 I l .. / I : ,_is .• :, .'s • .:;:.:-. Y. i \ i ... -_ ...- tt I i ''''..:.!..: IIt 'F.!' ,Tv.•.• / 1 f 11 .. . ... . ... !!`....• ..... , Iilirir °' .. 11T Ept:;•I'iRNKC:LA-Te' 7 E C H:.';::1;..0•:ii:,.:..4..,:.:f......7....c.1:1....t.._ ...::::..::::.42 i I !.• ( % 8TH ,:,L.,::. ......:: ::.: \4',.. ,:::L:*:•:.,• ',. ,... ".-.:::., :.-:.;•i•;.. .;:-..F.:i...... 4 I r: -I -1 ....: ADD ---....•...... W 76TH S1_ Ar....DITION ,J1 ,. ..:.,. 5TH -).- .-• . \ ---......_ '' - • . re <:',.. )_ , .•: : :. •411 ;...Col F ...: \ ::::.:• :. i. .i,.,.. / cn i Vi :::::::i ::::. ....:::•::::.:•• -,,...--- C i..? E Ar - :::::::' •:• : . '''."- N ... 't \ , - .:::•:::.:.:•••••:::::. ..:::. •-- 'll" 1111111 .44 '1 \ ........ :::•.':;.I.W:..::.:. : ... __ .A011.."- -,/9' -411111 NI ::::'::• ,:;:. ..: : : - ': ,i.: ..:p rzoi r4---Ni3 ' • • • • .'::::•::.:•;.:H::: . bligre , ,_...... ,... - 4 , ST:;;: i"--, E'=.-.ST • , , A V1KIN ... z.z...............___'-•-•..,.... •-. . . I . ,= =,,..... -...morm ........... —,......------""--"*"----"-"" ..... 1 ST. 'ES1. 57 1 i \ \ CvNTF:ii Illipp 4110 ( --. :::. .. •- .:: -... :••:: ::::: ::••••:::•.*:.::•.. : : :: : .: • IIAI .:::: :::.: :: :•:,... i•:. ..... '.: ' ::::: .... . . .• . .• . • . ... . . :::: '.... :.: -:::::.:: ::::: . • :...... . . . . . . . -•:•::: : .-..•....-.............., : ..... ......: : . .. . .. : . ..... .. . : . . ........: .. . ( :g.. .::'••:...::,::... ...::::::'......::::. .., , • • • Odk ..-..::::: :::':- •::::::::.::•::::: ....•..: ••••:•::: ::.•:•:••••••;. ..: . - :.•:-..':: • :::::::'..::..•:• ' •:-....:•-. :-: ::-..- • ..r:•. ':•:•:•:: ••::•::: .: :::.• -:.: .•..:::•••:• : . .... ...•:.:: :7:.:H:••••-: .. .:. :::Z.::.::•. .•:::::::•::::::.: i :::::::::: - ::::.:: :::::. ::::::: ::::.;:.:.::: ::::: . ::::::::.•••:::::::•.•••:: :::.:::: ::::•"::::::.: .::::.: :::::......:..:....: :.•:::::::.•••••..::::::H.::.•::.:.H... .-...... :1:• • •....* . ::: ..:.......:::::...". :::: . _.,,k ..:::::. ::::::::•::::::••.:::::. .:::::.:;:. :::::.1:.::::::::: :*:: ::. .....•;: H :::::::::::::::::::::: 1 •••:..:::;:.... ..:.... ......... i :::::::: 1:::: 1..... :.:.:: P.' V :::::::•::•:::::::::.: :.*::: ::•":::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::. :::::::•:::::.: : ..:;.:: ..•:::. .:: • :;•;•• •.: ::::::::•:: :Is S •::::::::::•::- :••.:: :::::: •:::::.::::::•: :::::. ::::•:: :::::::::::::: ::.:.......:.;::::: ..........:: ..... . ::: • :: .... ..... ...................: . :•:•' . ..• . :::::...:i ::.,„0:::::42:::::_e•-••::im..•::•::.4• ::::•: •:••:::: :::::. :::::::::::::: .........:.4;:i r.. f . :: :.. ::: :. :. ..•......::...:.• 0 .• :::.4: :rw::‘,::z•-:Ft:...1::IQ: 41.:::: -•:..:: ::::.:-.::........ ::: ..... • : .: :. :: .....-. .........:...:::::: • .••" •:•.•:•:•••••• •:•••• .- :: •:••••••• .:: :•. : .:::•:•:•: • .•:. ..::: . ::• - .. .:•:::.•:•::::: . •. ...-....., ...-..:...::.....:....:....: :...-....... : : .:-.::... :.:::::•..:.:.....:.:::..:::.....::.••..•...i...:...:...:..:.1. .....:..-.......:...::..1 :.. i..•.. : . -:::::::.••...-...•...............:......:.•... z _ ....---- -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •• .• : ::.:..•.•.::- :. : . :. 4:.::....................•.,.........i ........:: ,.:......:.: :..: : . . . . • . . • . • •. .. . . . . . • . . . . •• • • • • •. • • •. . • •. . •.• . . . • : :•:::: •:: :• i LAX pc . .... . ....'.••;:••::::::::* :;:.• ..... ::-;•:•:::•: i.:::::::••:• :::::••• •••:: .:. . ....•: :::::-..:::.:-.....l...i.....: i Staff Report Southwest Crossing 1996 PUD Concept Amendment July 8, 1996 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT Southwest Crossing was a Planned Unit Development approved in 1984, amended in 1987, and amended as individual sites developed with specific site plans. The Planned Unit Development was approved for a mixture of office, commercial and industrial uses totaling approximately 1.626 million square feet. The Planned Unit Development concept amendment affects Sites 12, 16, 17, and 18. Site 12 6 story office building 116,864 square feet Site 16 2 story office building 65,000 square feet Site 17 2 story office building 72,000 square feet Site 18 1 story office building 18,000 square feet Site 16 and 17 would be combined into one site for an 90,590 square foot office showroom building (MEPC) proposal. A total of 46,410 square feet from Site 16 and 17 would be transferred to Site 12. Site 18 would be eliminated and 18,000 square feet would also be transferred to Site 12. Site 12 would be amended for a 181,274 square foot building. To accommodate the additional building square footage would require an expansion of the building footprint or adding 2 stories. Structured parking would be required. TREE PRESERVATION AND TREE REPLACEMENT The Developer is requesting approval of a tree loss and tree replacement plan for the entire Planned Unit Development. When Southwest Crossing was first reviewed by the City in 1984, it was prior to a Tree Ordinance. The woodland preserve area (12.10 acres) was approved as a trade-off for the trees that would be removed throughout the PUD. The tree ordinance requires an inventory and a calculation of tree loss. A tree inventory for all of the remaining sites within the project and tree replacement plan has been prepared. There are 14,016 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 4965 inches or 35%. This is less than the average tree loss of 40%for commercial, office and industrial projects. Tree replacement 2,311 inches. There is excess landscaping above the minimum caliper inch requirement of the City code planted on other sites which can be credited towards the tree replacement or an amount of 1,100 inches. The additional tree replacement requirement is 1,211. CONCLUSION The transfer of building square footage from Site 18 to Site 12 is a benefit to the City . The office building located close to Nine Mile Creek would be eliminated and be converted to open space as part of Lot 12. The City also benefits from the woodland preserve area which is a large hill with 6,678 inches significant trees. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment based on plans dated July 5, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996 and subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planned Unit Development Concept is amended as follows: A. Site 12 is a 181,274 square foot office building. B. Site 16 and 17 is a one-story, 90,950 square foot office showroom building. C. The 18,000 square foot building located on Site 18 will be eliminated and converted into open space. D. The woodland preserve area (12.10 acres) shall be established as a permanent conservation easement to the City. E. A tree replacement plan for 1,211 caliper inches. g:\swcross.96 1 Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 D. SOUTHWEST CROSSING 1996 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT by BTO Development. Request for Planned Unit ", Development Concept Amendment on 109 acres. Location: Viking Drive. Franzen reviewed the Staff Report with the Planning Commission. Southwest Crossing was a Planned Unit Development approved in 1984, amended in 1987, and amended as individual sites developed with specific site plans. The Planned Unit Development was approved for a mixture of office, commercial and industrial uses totaling approximately 1.626 million square feet. The Planned Unit Development concept amendment affects Sites 12, 16, 17, and 18. The developer is requesting approval of a tree loss and tree replacement plan for the entire Planned Unit Development. When Southwest Crossing was first reviewed by the City in 1984 it was prior to a Tree Ordinance. The woodland preserve area (12.10 acres) was approved as a trade-off for the trees that would be removed throughout the PUD. Staff supports this project because a building close to the creek is eliminated and converted into open space, and a 12.10 wooded hill is placed into a conservation area. The overall tree loss is 35 percent. Item E under Staff Recommendations in the Staff Report should be changed to 1,211 caliper inches instead of 1,100. Ismail asked if they measure the trees one by one. Franzen replied yes. Wissner stated she supports the project. • Foote said he likes the idea of preserving the 12 acres of woodland. He supports the project. Sandstad commented about a 46 inch white oak tree that will be saved in the 12 acres. He would like to see the City Forester consider a slightly different value for a tree that is that significant in size. Right now they treat them all the same over 12 inches and there should be some distinction. Franzen noted that this Commission will have an 9 Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 opportunity to review the comments from the Tree Committee at the next Planning Commission meeting. Foote noted that when he was on the Tree Committee they did have discussion as to preserving a tree just for heritage value. Habicht commented this is a welcomed trade-off and he supports the project. The public hearing-was opened. Fred Hedberg stated that his company leases buildings on Viking Drive. He was concerned about how this new development with transferring density to the building directly north of his building would affect the trees. He was also concerned about the amount of trips that would be generated by a building of this size. There will be many more cars accessing that site under this plan than the old plan. They are not against this project but would like to make sure the developer, the Planning Commission, and the City Council look closely at how access will be provided to that building. They would like to see primary access points not between their building but at some other point. Franzen reviewed where the primary and secondary access points are proposed. Sandstad was concerned about the billboards on the property. Franzen stated the master developer's agreement talks about the removal of those billboards. MOTION 1: Habicht moved, seconded by Ismail, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Habicht moved, seconded by Ismail, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of BTO development for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 109 acres based on plans dated July 5, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996 with the revision of item I E from 1,100 caliper inches to 1,211 caliper inches. Motion carried 6-0. 10 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert,Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: July 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Supplement Staff Report to the City Planner Report of July 5, 1996 for Southwest Crossing- 1996 Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment BACKGROUND: This PUD amendment is to realign some of the lots; namely, sites 12, 16, 17 and 18 of the original Southwest Crossing PUD. The desire is to combine 16 and 17 into one site and to eliminate site 18 and transfer part of that site into site 12. Site 12 would be changed to allow a larger building pad due to the expanded square foot of the site as proposed in this amendment. NATURAL RESOURCES ISSUES: Tree Preservation/Loss The original Golden Strip PUD followed by the Southwest Crossing development was first reviewed by the City in 1984. This was prior to the Tree Preservation Policy or Ordinance. Because of the wooded nature of this site, however, it was pointed out that a particular area of the site should be preserved from the onset of initial development. This woodland preserve area was defined as an area 12.1 acres in size and was approved as a condition the trees would be cut on other areas of the proposed PUD. The developer is now proposing to amend the original PUD and in doing so is providing the City with more detailed information related to the trees remaining on this site. This information is reported to the Commission in the brown booklet entitled Southwest Crossing PUD Tree Removal and Tree Replacement Plan. In reviewing the data enclosed, the staff feels that it is accurate and, therefore, is comfortable with the projection that there be a 35%tree loss on the proposed amended PUD. Based on this projected loss, a total of 2,311 caliper inches of landscaping would be needed as a minimum to mitigate the tree loss. As with any commercial development,there may be additional landscaping screening requirements for code compliance when screening loading dock areas, parking areas, etc. Sidewalk and Trail Issue: When this project was originally proposed, a public trail was constructed from Golden Triangle Drive to meet with an existing trail along Smetana Lake by Vantage Corporation. The City does not have a document authorizing public access or usage of this trail. The staff recommends that the appropriate document be developed to either give ownership of the trail to the City or that there be a trail use and maintenance easement thereby allowing the public to freely use the existing trail. Woodland Preservation/Conservation The issue of the remaining woodland preserve area can be addressed in one of two ways. Tthis area can be set aside under a scenic and conservation easement, which would protect all of the existing trees or it can be designated as an outlot and the land gifted to the City by the developer so that the property is under City ownership. Both of these options have been discussed with the developer and they will be checking with their legal department to determine which option they feel is best for their purposes. The staff is comfortable with both options since scenic and conservation easements would be filed on the lots and thereby alert any future buyer that there is an area set aside for preservation of the tree mass. RECOMMENDATION: The staff feels that this project does make some significant improvements to the original Southwest Crossing PUD. The project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its July 8, 1996 meeting and was approved on a 6-0 vote. Staff would recommend approval of this Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 25 acres as outlined in the staff recommendations of the July 5, 1996 and the contents of this supplemental staff report. AmendSW/Stuart96 I9-% Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 Lambert commented that it's better planning to do a Planned Unit Development showing everything because this way everyone is aware of what's going to happen in the future. Brown also noted he would like to see a landscaping plan. MOTION: Brown moved, seconded by Wilson,to recommend approval of the first phase excluding phase two until the Parks Commission is able to review the landscaping plan and tree inventory. Motion carried 6-0. B. Southwest Crossing 1996 PUD Concept Amendment Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 11, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Miles Lindberg, BRW Company, gave an overview of the request for concept amendment. He commented this is a two part plan. One part deals with tree loss and tree replacement on several remaining undeveloped parcels within the Southwest Crossing PUD. The other request deals with a couple of density transfers that are being proposed to make the PUD configurations consistent with the latest plans the developer has. The reason for the request is that when the PUD was initially planned and approved there was not a landscape and tree replacement ordinance in place. This request attempts to look at this in a comprehensive way across the whole PUD. With the approval of the plan that's proposed,the developer and landowner will have a degree of certainty in terms of representing what could be done with each of those remaining parcels in terms of tree removal, and also a commitment needed to be made on each of those parks in terms of tree replacement. The other part of this plan deals with the density transfer that attempts to make the PUD consistent with specific plans. Another important part of that request relates to the tree loss. Tree replacement is part of the plan for preservation of existing trees. The plan is for an original six acre wooded land preserve or conservation area on the hillside west of Golden Triangle Drive to be expanded to about 12 acres in size. This is a commitment as to one of the most significant and natural features that were part of this PUD. They have provided the City with more detailed information related to the trees remaining on this site which is included in the brown booklet entitled, "Southwest Crossing PUD Tree Removal and Tree Replacement Plan". The 1s Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 projection is that there will be 35%tree loss on the proposed amended PUD. Using that percentage and formula in the ordinance, they determined the amount of replacement plantings that would be required. They also provided schematic level plans that illustrated how and where those replacements would occur within the PUD. These plans are all included in the brown booklet. Lambert noted this PUD amendment is to realign some of the lots; namely, Sites 12, 16, 17 and 18 of the original Southwest Crossing PUD. The desire is to combine 16 and 17 into one site and to eliminate Site 18 and transfer part of that site into Site 12. Site 12 would be changed to allow a larger building pad due to the expanded square foot of the site as proposed in this amendment. He also noted that the developer did build a trail through the site and there is no easement over that trail. Staff recommended that the appropriate document be developed to either give ownership of the trail to the City or that there be a trail use and maintenance easement, thereby, allowing the public to freely use the existing trail. Hilgeman was concerned about what type of trees would be included in the replacement plan. Lindberg noted the replacement would include a mixture of hardwood trees and conifers which fits the criteria of the ordinance. Jacobson asked what was going to happen to Site 15. Lindberg replied that Site 15 will actually be part of Site 16 and 17. Hilgeman asked if this concept amendment means they are losing quite a few square feet. Lindberg said the total square footage of the building area comes very close to what they had before. Brown asked if Site 15, 16, and 17 will be a one-story building. Lindberg replied yes. Koenig was concerned if there was any possibility of saving anything in that site. Lindberg noted that part of the reason for the 100 percent tree loss is because there's a fair amount of grade change that needs to be taken care of. It's not buildable in its present condition in terms of grade. MOTION: Wilson moved, seconded by Jacobson, for approval of the Planning Staff Report of July 5, 1996, and the Supplemental Staff Report of July 11, 1996, with the contingency on the dedication of the trail at the time of the final plat. Motion carried 6-0. ly EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.C. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger SOUTHWEST CROSSING GOLDEN TRIANGLE Michael Franzen BUSINESS CENTER Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 11.10 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 Park on 11.10 acres; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 11.10 acres; Background: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the July 8,1996 meeting. This site is currently guided Office and zoned Rural. This site was designated for two office buildings, totaling 137,000 square feet of building as part of the 1984 and 1987 Southwest Crossing Planned Unit Development.This project requires an amendment to the approved PUD to allow a change in land use from Office to Industrial and a transfer of development potential of 46,410 square feet from this site to Site 12. The site plan shows the construction of a one-story, 90,590 square foot building. The developer is requesting a waiver from 50 to 35 feet along Golden Triangle Drive. This is the same setback waiver that was granted for the Southwest Crossing industrial buildings to the west of this site along Viking Drive.The developer is also requesting a waiver through the PUD District Review to allow up to 75% Office. This waiver is similar to the percentage of Office waiver granted to Southwest Crossing for the industrial sites to the west. When the PUD was approved, a trade off for 100%tree loss on this property was the preservation of a 12.10 acre wooded hill on the west side of Golden Triangle Drive. The hill will be protected by conservation easement or by dedication to the city. The overall tree loss for the planned unit development is 35%. This is less than the 40%average tree loss for office, commercial, and industrial projects. Staff recommendation The staff recommends approval. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution PUD Concept Review 2. Staff Report dated July 5, 1996 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated July 8, 1996 2 SOUTHWEST CROSSING GOLDEN TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF SOUTHWEST CROSSING GOLDEN TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTER FOR MEPC AMERICAN PROPERTIES,INC. WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center by MEPC American Properties, Inc. and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 6, 1996; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated July 30, 1996. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 8, 1996. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of August, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center Legal Description Lot 1, Block 1, Golden Strip East q STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: MEPC American Properties,Inc. LOCATION: Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.10 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 11.10 acres. 3. Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park on 11.10 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 11.10 acres. 5 • •••• . / -:. .)ss. .-...'.... -. A7r.: ..• . ..... -;..... . /: 111011.;44‘ raitill IIEp,..42.Neti...rg.3 Tr:CH:.';:7+;...0'..1%. -.4 t; ...:••::....- - iitTE47.;:-INOI • IP II ILIILL 114 _ •:::•:• ::•:•:• •••' :-•,- ': .2.:::-.....:".• j.1' • :.: : • :-:: ......;* 7TH sr: -, A.,-,,, 51-r1 ADDITIN ...'•..:: - : : •::: :::: • -: :::::-.-:..: - . .. • -.. . • : • : • r: : ::. '.,., t',4:1 . .- ' ...v..::' .. : . ..,..7..);:i...::: N. 1: i V !lift 44 .r. i4 44, II ii A( II .'i 1.1 .....: 71 :.:..)....:1.1 11.- . .‘..):T la 11.17-7; £ A.- - -; .......':.' , \-. Qi- -.. ..;.>- 1?§ 6 •:. • 0 ,;... z II x kill1.1111w i , -11 ;.:• .:: ! n. Ei-"'.5 T 1'ill'- .. , :-....,,...:, , -,,, . „ . ... E:'-'i '.--71:",P . 101,4G DRIVE • NO Olvr \,,....„. --"------•-- ---- -----------7--At 4y-i 3 r4 )i -5 ______ sl. ............„.....-_________,„lir ....,............0....... ,. ST. L--- cAaRiC4 17 / . -r-'• Ttrt i.......N ,, 1 N s, 1 \. • ( ., ::.: ::•.::: :: :•-:: .... : • ••• •:•: :•:.• •:•: :-:•: •34-..,...-: - : • • : .:::: ::: it 0 ' : . . . ••-.•• . . . . . . . . . : ..: ... lir . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • . . . . . . . . ... .... .. . ....... . .... . ... . • • ... • . ._. .. . :::,: ••• • . : . : .•:• ••.... .• •: :• •• :• • • ...•: :•:•: . •..: •:•:•: : . .• . . . . . . . . . . . . :::: .::::::: • . .......:•:.:•:.:. 0. ..:,. :•::..• ::.:::::,.. ...... : : : :. . .... ...:• :• : . . . ::: „..- •:•. ::::: :•:•:::. :::.::::: ::::::.....: ..-„,...:::.:i: :i: 7 - -.....: :...i:-..::. ..:-::::: :::: :::::: :::::..::.:: : : ..:::'::. :.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :-*-::— :::-:---: • :---:-.. :::::.: ::-::::.:.:::::.;:. .:::::::..i......:::: :::.:: ::::::::..... ....: :::::::::.: ••• ••::::::::J.::;:.... ..-2.:..::::: * .::::::::::::::.::::::: .: : r.He....:.::.::.:::::::::::..* :.-ii:.--:::::.:.:::.:_ *- I. *.• :::::: ::.:::::::::::: :::: ::.::::.:.:.: :::::::::.::..:'::*: '::.:: :::::.-.•:::::.:: :•. ':::::::.: .::' i::.::::::.: ::::.::.::.:". :--- . ... * • •:-A:. :*:0::4! ...)?-...:4:4•:#:::::::::: •::::::::::::::::::.. it:Ir....ki:.-.::i-.::i::::.::::.::::::: . :-, . : :• ::•::• :::••••: :•: ::: :..:::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::• :• •: -:.,-.•:• •:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•: e • •: .:• •:•: .....::::;.::•.-....:•:......:-.....•.::.:-:.:.::•:.:".:...:....-.....• ....-: :•.:• •. -.:::- •:::-...:.::.:::::":.:..:.:.:..:.:..:::.. ,-,7 . .. ..: 7 ..- : . :::::::.::::.::::::::.:•:::: ::-: :: -:.: :: .::. -:: .. -.-.-.-.....-. - - .-. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \Ni .. . . . . . . . .. • . - - • • • - - - • • - - - • - • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ... ' . "IT.' ' • .....:.... ..:-:. .....:.. ..::::....-.-... . , , . . . . . . . . . .•. . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..j > 4-4Es . : : ::.. :::..: :::. : : -- ...::::4--:.: ::-...:: :":-. ::: •:.:7::: •:.7 :•-•":::ii.i :i:i-:i:E:i ,:.• - ,. : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • :-. ... .H ...: . . - . . : :-:-. ..:.:.- .-.•" -.:.:.- ,:. .:: :: :::::_..::::::.::::::: .,,:-_.f Staff Report Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center July 5, 1996 BACKGROUND This site is currently guided Office and zoned Rural. This site was designated for two office buildings,totaling 137,000 square feet of building as part of the 1984 and 1987 Southwest Crossing Planned Unit Development. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT This project requires an amendment to the approved PUD to allow a change in land use from Office to Industrial and a transfer of development potential of 46,410 square feet from this site to Site 12. SITE PLAN The site plan shows the construction of a one-story, 90,590 square foot building on 11.10 acres of land at a base area ratio of.18. The Industrial Zoning District would allow up to a .3 base area ratio for a one-story building. The building meets the required 50 foot structure setback from Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive. The building meets the required sideyard setback requirement of 25 feet. The required setback to parking is 50 feet along one street frontage and 25 feet along the second street frontage. As part of the PUD District Review, the developer is requesting a waiver from 50 to 35 feet along Golden Triangle Drive. This is the same setback waiver that was granted for the Southwest Crossing industrial buildings to the west of this site along Viking Drive. The developer is also requesting a waiver through the PUD District Review to allow up to 75% Office. This waiver is similar to the percentage of Office waiver granted to Southwest Crossing for the industrial sites to the west. The waiver should be granted for a higher percentage of Office if the following conditions are met: 1. Parking must meet the requirements for 75%Office and 25% warehouse. This would be a total of 351 spaces. A total of 351 spaces are shown on the site plan. 2. Since this is Industrial Zoning in an Office guided area, the building must meet the requirements of the Office Zoning District for 75% face brick and glass. This project meets this requirement. 3. The loading area should not be visible from any public roads. The loading area is screened by the building. Staff Report Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center July 5, 1996 4. Landscaping requirements should be consistent with Office requirements. The landscape plan meets Office landscaping requirements. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE The proposed one-story building will be constructed out of 75% face brick and glass, meeting the requirements of the Office Zoning District. The building has an office appearance around the sides of the building which are visible from public roads. Mechanical equipment is proposed to be screened by a three foot high parapet wall. GRADING AND SIGNIFICANT TREES The 1984 and 1987 PUD for the property showed two buildings totaling 137,000 square feet. That plan with parking would require that the entire site be graded and all 1,869 inches of significant trees would be lost. When the PUD was approved, a trade off for the tree loss on this property was the preservation of 12.10 acres of a wooded hill on the south side of Golden Triangle Drive. Although tree loss is 100%on the property, the overall tree loss for the entire 109 acre PUD, is 35%. (Refer to documents in the Staff Report for Southwest Crossing - 1996 PUD Amendment.) A 20 foot high retaining wall is proposed along the north property line of which part of the construction is within the NSP power easement. Approval is required by NSP prior to construction. The retaining wall is proposed to be constructed out of segmental rock which is consistent with City requirements for masonry construction for Office, Industrial and Commercial sites. SHORELAND ORDINANCE This site is within 300 feet of the center line of Nine Mile Creek and provisions of the Shoreland Ordinance regarding lot size, lot width,building setback apply for industrial buildings. This project exceeds the five acre minimum lot size requirement, exceeds the 150 foot lot width at the building line, exceeds the minimum width at the ordinary high water mark of 150 feet, and exceeds 150 foot setback from the high water mark. The building is approximately 300 feet from the center line of the creek. STORM WATER TREATMENT A treatment pond is proposed to be constructed along Golden Triangle Drive. Staff Report Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center July 5, 1996 UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available in Golden Triangle Drive. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based upon a caliper inch requirement according to building square footage, tree replacement, and screening of parking and loading areas. The caliper inch requirement is 263 inches. Tree replacement is required based upon the overall tree replacement plan as stated in the Southwest Crossing PUD tree removal and tree replacement plan dated May 24, 1996. Since the landscape plan shows 634 inches, 361caliper inches can be credited towards tree replacement. Since the site sits lower than Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive,the site will have to rely upon plant materials for screening. The amount of landscaping shown on the perimeter of the property meets the City's requirement for screening of parking. The loading area area is screened by the building. LIGHTING The type of lighting for the project must be consistent with the lighting approved for other projects within the Southwest Crossing PUD. This would be Type B as shown on the lighting legend on sheet A-3 of the development plans. Any wall lighting on the building or within the loading area must be a downcast design so that light is directed down on the property rather than straight out from the building. SIGNS The proposed monument sign meets the City code requirement for an 80 square foot maximum sign and a height of 8 feet. The monument sign must be located a minimum of 20 feet back from Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive and should not interfere with the site vision distance triangle. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT Site 16 and 17 were designated for two- 2 story office buildings totaling 130,000 square feet. The current proposal is an 85,000 square foot 1 story office showroom building. The 52,000 square feet 9 Staff Report Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center July 5, 1996 of development potential would be transferred to Site 12. TREE LOSS/TREE REPLACEMENT The existing trees totaling 1,869 inches are centrally located on the property. The approved concept plan for the property with 130,000 square feet of office would have removed 100%of the vegetation. When the 1.6 million square foot planned unit development was approved on this 109 acre total area site, the 100% tree loss on this property was a trade-off for preservation of approximately 12 acres of a wooded hill on the west side of Golden Triangle Drive. With the enactment of the Tree Ordinance in 1990, the developers or owners of properties are required to inventory trees. Even though this site has 100% tree loss, with the current proposal, the overall tree loss with the planned unit development is 35%. This is less than the City average for Office, Industrial and Commercial projects of 40%. The PUD Amendment project (Southwest Crossing 1996) has a complete inventory of all trees within the PUD and a tree replacement plan. A total of 263 inches of tree replacement would be planted on the MEPC site. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review,Rezoning from Rural to1-2 Park, and Site Plan Review based on plans dated July 5, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, and subject to the following conditions: • 1. Prior to final plat approval,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion..control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. 10 Staff Report Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center July 5, 1996 D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3. Prior to grading,the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. The following waivers from city code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the Industrial Zoning District: a. A percentage of Office from 50%to 75%. b. Front yard setback from 50 feet to 35 feet. g:\swcross.gtb I� TickA.l;rt� Coo-tri5siC►'•, Mondwy Julj 8, 1996 C. SOUTHWEST CROSSING GOLDEN TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTER by MEPC American Properties, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.10 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 11.10 acres, Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 Park on 11.10 acres, and Site Plan Review on 11.10 acres. Location: Golden Triangle Drive and Viking Drive. Franzen commented this project and the next one on the agenda are related.. This site back in 1984 and 1987 was designated for two office`buildings, 137,000 square feet in total. With this project of 90,000 square feet, they are transferring density to another site within the PUD to make a larger corporate facility. Dan Gelson, regional vice president of MEPC, gave a brief background about his company and reviewed the development proposal with the Planning Commission. He Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 noted they are in the process of buying from BTO, the land which is on the plans, and plan to develop a high tech building there. They built a similar building to it in Golden Valley. They could have 50 to 75 percent office with storage in back. They could go higher and take the entire dock area and put more parking back there to meet all parking requirements. Ismail asked what high tech building means. Gelson replied it's an office service type product. There is an office in front and a warehouse in the back. In many cases it's very little warehouse with just some storage. Edward Fan, architect, reviewed the building plans including the elevations. It's a multi-tenant building with 75 percent brick and glass on the entire building to meet requirements. The NURP pond is on the north side of the property which will accommodate the storm drainage runoff treatment which is in the creek area. The colors of the building are pastel and the brick is green tinted. Trash will be inside the dock and screened from the road. Franzen commented Staffs recommends approval according to the recommendations on the last two pages of the Staff Report. Habicht was concerned about the reduction in the parking setback and asked if it was necessary to get all the parking spaces in. Franzen replied based upon current use of the property with the loading area in the back, that setback waiver would be necessary. Foote expressed concern about the 100 percent tree loss. Franzen stated they are averaging the tree loss over the entire 109 acre proposal much in the same way they do with residential projects with multiple phases. Ismail was concerned about the 35 percent tree loss and the 100 percent tree loss. Franzen explained how they arrived at both figures. He noted they didn't have a tree ordinance back in 1984. They looked at what Staff thought was the best to preserve which was the 50 foot high hill with only thousands of caliber inches of significant trees. This PUD has already dedicated a land area along Smetana Lake and Nine Mile Creek. It's either a dedication of the hill to the City or put a conservancy easement over the hill so it's never touched. MOTION 1: Foote moved, seconded by Wissner, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Foote moved, seconded by Wissner,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of MEPC American Properties, Inc. request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 11.10 acres, Planned Unit development District Review on 11.10 acres, Rezoning from Rural to I-2 Park on 11.10 acres, and Site Plan Review on 11.10 acres based on plans dated July 5, 1996, and subject to the �� recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities spf FROM: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: July 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Supplement Staff Report to the July 5, 1996 City Planner Report for Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center BACKGROUND: This development is proposed in the area of Golden Triangle Drive and north of Viking Drive. Currently, a billboard sits on the site and it is a wooded knoll. This site is currently guided for office development; however, it is zoned Rural. The project does require an amendment to approve the PUD since the land use is going to change from office to industrial. In addition,there will be transferring of a potential 4,600 square feet of development from this area to site 12 of the Southwest Crossing PUD. NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES: Tree Loss-Landscaping The current site has approximately 100 mature trees on it,totaling 1,869 diameter inches. This is a 100% loss of trees on the property; however, this issue is addressed in the overall Southwest Crossing - 1996 PUD Amendment, which shows that for the entire 109-acre PUD the tree loss is only 35%. The tradeoff that the City made in 1984 and 1987 for development in this area was that a 12.1 acre wooded hill would be set aside to mitigate the tree loss on the remaining PUD area. In addition, to mitigating a portion of the tree loss, the developer is also required to plant landscaping material as required by ordinance according to building square footage, and landscape screening requirements for parking and loading dock areas. This site requires 263 caliper inches of landscaping material;however, the landscape plan which has been supplied by the developer show 634 caliper inches of tree replacement. This yields a credit of 361 caliper inches toward the overall tree replacement on the entire PUD. /y NURP Pond An NURP pond is proposed to be constructed along Golden Triangle Drive north of the proposed building. This pond would be subject to review by the City Engineering Department for proper sizing and adequate storm handling capabilities. The discharge water from this pond would be channeled into Nine-Mile Creek on the northerly edge of the property. Sidewalk/Trails Currently,there is an existing five foot wide sidewalk on the east side of Golden Triangle Drive and an eight foot wide bituminous trail on the west side. Staff would recommend this sidewalk not be disturbed during the grading or landscaping process. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its July 8, 1996 meeting and received a 6-0 vote of approval. Staff would recommend approval of the project as detailed in the staff report of July 5, 1996 and the content of this supplemental staff report. GoldenTra/Stuart96 '-J Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 C. Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 11, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Edward Farr, architect, representing MEPC, reviewed the development proposal with the Commission. The proposal is for a 90,000 square foot single story office warehouse. They are providing a NURP pond on the property which acts as the storm water buffer to the Nine Mile Creek watershed area. He showed the building elevation which showed the design character of the building, and gave an overview of the landscaping plan. The building will be constructed of blonde buff colored brick with green select glass for the windows. Mechanical equipment will be completely screened on the roof via a rooftop screening integrated with the architecture of the building. Hilgeman was concerned about what trees were included in the replacement plan. Farr indicated they will match as closely as possible the trees that are being taken out. They will try to save as many trees as possible. Hilgeman asked if there were any plantings around the NURP pond. Farr replied there are plantings all around the NUR? pond. They are planting on every square inch of sod they have. Brown expressed concern about where access will be for the trucks driving in and out of the property. Farr explained there are three driveways and explained them on the map. Brown was concerned about the berm located behind this building and the Vikings'Headquarters building. Farr indicated the berm is on their property and there will be landscaping with retaining walls that would be seen from the height of the cabs of the trucks. Koenig asked how much parking there will be. Farr replied 351 parking stalls. They are attempting to have parking for 75 percent office occupancy and 25 percent storage occupancy. The 351 parking stalls support the total 100 percent manufacturing occupancy. They meet all the ordinances. MOTION: Kracum moved, seconded by Wilson, to approve the Southwest Crossing Golden Triangle Business Center proposal as per Planning Staff Report recommendations of July 5, 1996, and the Supplemental Staff Report I(o Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 of July 11, 1996. That the developer is interested in looking at preserving some trees, if possible, with the noted comment that the developer has indicated that they would attempt to preserve as many trees as possible during the development of the site. The Commission is approving this on the "good faith" effort noted by the speaker. Motion carried 6-0. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Request from Doug and Susan Heyvaert Regarding Outdoor Riding Arena. Staff referred the Commission to memos dated July 9, 1996, and May 22, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities; and a letter dated May 22, 1996, from Doug and Susan Heyvaert. Doug Heyvaert, 9002 Riley Lake Road, indicated they were at a horse show on Sunday. They showed a video tape of the show depicting what the arena looks like, how people park around the arena, what the ground looks like, etc. Hilgeman asked what the cost would be for the existing arena to be moved to the Riley Creek property. Lambert replied it would be man hours unless they have to replace some of the material. Heyvaert noted he received a quote of $1,500 for grading that has to be done. He estimates $3,000 for material. Koenig asked if the sand would be a one time thing. Heyvaert replied every couple of years you may need to bring another truck load in and it would cost about $200 to $300 each time. Hilgeman asked what the vote was from the Heritage Preservation Committee. Heyvaert noted they ultimately voted to approve on the land use for a riding arena. Brown expressed concern about the horses being tied up to the trailer with no one around. He was concerned about children and adults coming up to pet them and getting hurt. He was very concerned about having a horse arena in a public park. He supports the riding arena but would like an alternative plan for the horses when they are tied up like corralling them together. Heyvaert noted that Minnetonka has never had a problem and they have 12 shows a year. Hilgeman suggested giving it a chance and see what happens. 1(p� EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO, V-0. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY Michael Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 2.58 acres and Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 5.2 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 5.2 acres into 2 lots. Background: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the July 8, 1996 meeting. This site is part of the 1992 Galarneau/Shady Oak Business Center. The 18.4 acre Planned Unit Development included 52,400 square feet of Office, 11,600 square feet of Commercial, and 4,000 square feet of Restaurant. This portion of the pud was approved for three-two story office buildings totaling 36,400 sq. ft. HDMG is proposing a 15,221 square feet one-story building office building on a site which is currently zoned office. This would leave room for a future 10,000 sq. ft. Office building on the undeveloped piece to the west along Old Shady Oak Road. The following items from the planned unit development must be completed with this project. A. Implementation of the required 180 inches of tree replacement . B. Construction of a sidewalk along the east side of Old Shady Oak Road. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution PUD Concept Review 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Staff Report dated July 5, 1996 4. Planning Commission Minutes dated July 8, 1996 2 HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY FOR HDMG WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the HDMG Corporate Facility PUD Concept by HDMG and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers)and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 6, 1996; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. HDMG Corporate Facility, being in Hennepin County,Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated July 30, 1996. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 8, 1996. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of August, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A HDMG Corporate Facility Legal Description Lot 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1. Lot 1, 2, & 3, Block 2 and Outlot A, Shady Oak Business Center. Lf HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY BY HDMG BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of HDMG Corporate Facility for HDMG dated July 30, 1996, consisting of 5.2 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 6th day of August, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 5, 1996 SUBJECT: HDMG Corporate Facility APPLICANT: Jamie Heuton/HDMG/Marbles FEE OWNER: Gordon Galarneau LOCATION: Rowland Road and Shady Oak Road REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.2 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.58 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 2.58 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 5.2 acres into 2 lots. tP vu 2 NO | ~ / ILI -� Staff Report HDMG Corporate Facility July 5, 1996 BACKGROUND This site is part of the 1992 Galameau/Shady Oak Business Center. The 18.4 acre Planned Unit Development included 52,400 square feet of Office, 11,600 square feet of Commercial, and 4,000 square feet of Restaurant. This portion of the Planning Unit Development is currently guided Office and zoned Office for three - two story buildings, totaling 36,400 square feet. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT HDMG is proposing a 15,221 square feet one-story building. The proposed lot size, the amount of parking required, and a change from a two-story to a one-story building site leaves enough room for a future 10,000 square foot building on the remaining portion of the south end of the PUD. The PUD amendment would be a reduction in square footage from 36,400 square feet to 25,221 square feet. SITE PLAN The site plan shows the construction of a one-story 15,221 square foot building at a base area ratio of.135. The Office zoning district permits up to a .30 base area ratio. A total of 75 parking spaces are required. The site plan shows 61 actual parking spaces and 14 proof of parking spaces. The building meets the required 35 foot setback from Shady Oak Road and Rowland Road. Parking meets the required 35 foot setback from Shady Oak Road and 17.5 foot setback from Rowland Road. LANDSCAPING The landscaping requirement is based upon a caliper inch requirement according to building square footage,tree replacement from the approved PUD, and screening of parking areas. The caliper inch requirement is 48 inches. The tree replacement requirement is 440 inches to be planted throughout the 18.4 acre Planned Unit Development. This site should provide 180 inches. Prior to Council review,the developer shall revise the landscaping plan to include 180 inches of tree replacement. Staff Report HDMG Corporate Facility July 5, 1996 GRADING AND EXISTING TREES This site was previously graded as part of the original grading plan approved with the Planned Unit Development. There will be a slight modification to the approved grading plan to accommodate the site plan as proposed,but it will not affect the existing significant trees that are located on the knoll on the north end of the building. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available in Rowland Road. As part of the original master storm drainage plan, a NURP pond is to be constructed on the adjoining property to the south. This treatment pond must be constructed concurrent with this phase. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS There should be a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk connection from the building to the existing bituminous trail along Rowland Road. A requirement of the approved Planned Unit Development was a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of Old Shady Oak Road. This sidewalk is to be completed concurrent with the construction of this building. ARCHITECTURE The approved Planned Unit Development architecture was the use of similar colors , similar building materials and a pitched roof. The pitched roof was for screening views of mechanical equipment from the homes on Cherokee Trail at a elevation higher than this property, for a residential character since the property was adjacent to residential property, and since the daycare and SuperAmerica also have pitched roofs. This proposed building is a one-story with a flat roof. An atrium is used to bring light into the building and to block views of mechanical equipment from a higher elevation. Reasons to consider a change in architecture on this site could be: 1. The building is at a considerable distance from the residential homes. 2. The site is located on Shady Oak Road opposite flat roof buildings across the highway. Staff Report HDMG Corporate Facility July 5, 1996 3. The reduced square footage of the PUD provides more green space. 4. The landscape plan with tree replacement helps screen the building. The proposed building meets the 75% face brick and glass requirement of the Office Zoning District. LIGHTING Any proposed lighting on the property must be a down-cast shoebox design with a maximum height of 20 feet. SIGNS The proposed monument sign is not designed at this time. The City code will allow a 50 square foot 8 foot high monument sign provided it meets a 20 foot setback requirement from both Shady Oak Road and Rowland Road. Since the proposed sign is located near an intersection, it is important that the monument sign be located to not block sight vision distance at the corner. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Review on 5.2 acres, PUD District Review on 2.58 acres, Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres, Site Plan Review on 2.58 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 5.2 acres into 2 lots based on plans dated July 5, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall submit a tree replacement plan for 180 inches. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. /0 Staff Report HDMG Corporate Facility July 5, 1996 B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 4. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 5. Implementation of the required tree replacement concurrent with development on this site. 6. Construction of a sidewalk along the east side of Old Shady Oak Road. 7. Construction of a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk connection between the building and the sidewalk along Rowland Road. 8. Enter into a cross-access and maintenance agreement for use of the common driveway between this site and the proposed site to the south. 9. The Planned Unit Development Concept plan is amended to include a 15,221 square foot building on this site and a 10,000 square foot building on the property to the west. g:\hdmgcotp.fac I I Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 B. HDMG CORPORATE FACILITY by HDMG. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.2 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.58 acres,Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres, Site Plan Review on 2.58 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.2 acres into 2 lots. Location: Rowland Road and Shady Oak Road. Franzen commented this is the third time looking at this property. The site was approved for a two-story office building with a pitched roof for screening of mechanical equipment and to create a residential look since the property is near residential areas. The residential look was a desire expressed by the neighborhood originally when the guide plan was changed from Medium Density Residential to Office. This is a flat roof building with mechanical units screened by an atrium. Jamie Heuton, HDMG, gave a brief background about his company. He noted that they have been in Eden Prairie for eight years and would like to stay here. They are also looking at the possibility of building an entire facility. Mark Fineman, architect, reviewed the development proposal with the Planning Commission. He believes they have achieved all the goals that were imposed on them on the original PUD. He reviewed how the site is being utilized and what the building will look like. He showed sketches indicating three images with different colors. There is a need to not fulfill all the parking stalls that might by required. The need for this particular business is to have 30 to 40 parking stalls relative to the 75 that are required. There will be screening of all mechanical equipment which would sit on the flat top roof. It's a large atrium which provides three sides of screening. They believe it's a more handsome look than the pitched roof. They are living up to the standard of percentage of glass and brick and are exceeding those numbers by a margin. Ismail commented he is very comfortable with the project because of the literature /2 Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 included in the packet. Wissner asked if all the neighbors were comfortable with this project. Heuton commented he did extensive canvassing in the area to talk with all the neighbors and address their concerns. Wissner commented it looks like something that's needed in Eden Prairie and is a nice start to that piece of property. She supported the proposal. Franzen noted Staff recommends approval according to the recommendations on page 4 and 5 of the Staff Report. The construction of the sidewalk on the east side of Old Shady Oak Road is part of the developer's agreement for the 18.4 acres. A condition in the agreement talked about the timing of that sidewalk would be concurrent with the construction of the first building. Habicht asked how big the extended wildlife area. Franzen indicated it's about half the site, about 9 acres and that the City owns it. MOTION 1: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of HDMG for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.2 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.58 acres, Zoning District Amendment on 2.58 acres, Site Plan Review on 2.58 acres and Preliminary Plat of 5.2 acres based on plans dated July 5, 1996, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996. Motion carried 6-0. )3 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: A .,%,+ b, 1944, SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS rr ITEM NO. V L. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger RILEY CREEK RIDGE Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 65 acres and PUD District Review on 65 acres; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 65 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 65 acres into 134 lots Background: The Planning Commission first reviewed this project at the June 22,1996 meeting. The Planning Commission was not comfortable with the proposed 142 unit plan because of the large number of waivers for lot size and street frontage. The Planning Commission voted to continue the project until July 8, 1996. At the July 8, 1996 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to approve a plan with 134 units with no waivers from the city code. The Planning Commission recommended that the connections to Valley and Hilltop Road not be made until the roads are upgraded. At the July 8,1996 meeting there were 18 questions raised by area residents regarding public hearing notification, density, parks, trails, airport, roads, utilities, traffic , and assessments. Answers to these questions are part of attached memos from Michael Franzen and Alan Gray. Supporting Reports: I 1. Resolution for Planned Unit Development Concept Review 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Staff Report dated July5, 1996 and June 21,1996 4. Planning Commission Minutes dated June 24, 1996 and July 8,1996. 5. Memo from Michael Franzen dated July 16,1996 "Questions From Area Residents" 6. Memo from Alan Gray dated July 29,1996 7. Memo from Michael Franzen dated July 29, 1996 8. Correspondence 2 RILEY CREEK RIDGE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF RILEY CREEK RIDGE FOR HUSTAD LAND COMPANY WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Riley Creek Ridge PUD Concept by Hustad Land Company and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on August 6, 1996; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Riley Creek Ridge, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated July 30, 1996. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 8, 1996. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 6th day of August, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A Riley Creek Ridge Legal Description I 1 That part of Ithe Wept Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 20,Township 116, Range 212 lying southerly of the southerly line of County Road No.1 and west of the west lin of the plat of "EDEN HEIGHTS", EXCEPT tip' e Westl 107.00 feet of said West Half lying north of a line drawn at 'right arhgles to the West line of said West Half from a point on said westl line didtant 1406.00 feet north of the southwest corner of said West Half) II That part of the Norkl�Halfo_the Nor_theast_.QuartPr -oSectiora- 29;r�oyuaskii{a—. 116, Range 212 lying west of the west line of Eden Prairie Road and northerly of the centeggline of 'Riley Creek. RILEY CREEK RIDGE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RILEY CREEK RIDGE FOR HUSTAD LAND COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Riley Creek Ridge for Hustad Land Company dated July 30, 1996, consisting of 62.77 acres into 134 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 6th day of August, 1996. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission - FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Riley Creek Ridge APPLICANT Hustad Land Company FEE OWNER: Hustad Land Company, Dean and Teresa Sundmark, William Schiebler, Doug and Juanita Swanson, Glenn and Phyliss Peterson, Eugene Swanson, Steve and Darla Yerkes, LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail,West of Eden Prairie Road REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres and Rezoning from Rural to R 1-9.5 and R 1-13.5 on 62.77 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 134 lots. CD 1 mmial / .3 o . uce±,3 • ',. 7,7 ::.:: :i .. •::::::: .1i 'SOL:7A CSVst'. > il 401. 4. mos RAGIIRs Rc, m IOW° ab CI . 1 . ."o4.m f-Qul ogIyNM.IN_ c ji -C44A::RS"' MNTrI A,' . •Rzz \z il CORRAL D — — ! —, - 1.. 1 fac 1-8 ix- . . .. • +0t, A • iala, • - , • • • 1 ICkt TA 1.: — _t- •. ., •.:' .1 : 4 4 4 4 ? .. F" :: ?I• it IHILLTOP RD 0 0 ii- a:.4 7- rd . ,....— , .1. ........s' [' ... ct ' "' VALLEY RD. '''-'• El I-.., .• ... • IS 1 .j -.. , la 4 c;- zo 21 rt 20 0 U - 0 4 4 _ Iv r. ... . ' 4 . 4 4 • .,- 4 . . ' . -/10 1 -"A Ctwie siLLS SOLI II Sal 'CC% *Nit A Cr% /........\_____._._ :s......,.,......4„,/,.,t7ii.........1z Lu . a _ . A - 74. N.. L. %It Staff Report C Riley Creek Ridge July 5, 1996 BACKGROUND This is a continued item from the June 24, 1996 meeting. The Planning Commission directed the developer to revise the Planned Unit Development plan to eliminate all waivers for street frontage and lot size. The Planning Commission also asked staff to provide additional information on park and open space, MAC ordinance#51, and development alternatives for the land south of Valley Road. REVISED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN The revised plan has no waivers for street frontage, lot size and shoreland lot width. The total number of lots is 134. There are 76 R1 9.5 lots and 58 R1-13.5 lots. Phase one has 33 R1-9.5 lots at a density of 2.92 units per acre. The R1-9.5 zoning district allows up to 3.5 units per acre. PARK AND OPEN SPACE The Park and Recreation staffhas indicated that a 10-15 acre neighborhood park should be provided south of Pioneer Trail between Cedar Forest and Spring Road. The park land would be obtained by dedication. The area currently targeted for the park is between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road. MAC ORDINANCE #51 There are no local ordinances which prohibit the expansion of the airport as long as any proposal is in conformance with federal, state, and Metropolitan Council requirements. MAC is an agency created by the State of Minnesota. It has the ability to adopt rules,regulations and ordinances after a public hearing. In 1978 MAC adopted Ordinance # 51 which restricts jet aircraft greater than 20,000 pounds maximum take-off weight from using Flying Cloud Airport. As part of its plans for the expansion of the airport,MAC is proposing in increase the weight limitation for jet aircraft from 20,000 pounds to 30, 000 pounds. DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR LAND SOUTH OF VALLEY ROAD The developer has prepared three alternative layouts for the land south of Valley Road. Staff is comfortable with any of the alternatives. There may also be other ways to develop the land. The Riley Creek Ridge plan does not preclude an orderly and efficient development of adjoining land. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77 acres,Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 134 lots based on plans dated July 5, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated June 21, and July 5, 1996 and subject to the following conditions: 8 Staff Report C Riley Creek Ridge July 5, 1996 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall: A. Provide a tree replacement plan for 1633 inches. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3.. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements... C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. E. Submit an architectural diversity plan for Phase I. 4. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 9 L r M Air. �e f 1 ■ I. `o ! ;i --11N.PiRli :.* . / '"" *4 , , co , ,. 4,, ,... ..‘,.. ,. rm, , ... , a, ' 1C4rp4i' I f-----I 1 ::.:::;:„.... w ••••:••• Tiff iff4 itt4 _ 4 CL. CZ g -•.' ` C ,IE ; `yasawns . ‘ :LU Od tliG'YYOtl I 13N31I1N • ,,ro, i- --------- , to c F- -....:;:::•••::::':....:::::'.:.•:.:.:.•:..:•....:':....:.::,::............ .. ,,t. j W i 1r O dig" / �--,- �42 1 -A . LZ CO �' N CV j I , ri, 1 .,-„vi. "%., N .19) [ 1 Co .31 Atli, . ,,,,. 1 . .,. ! ,.. /...: , ..... . x , . iN3G3 • , , ' a . _ i sr- Ah• lit /, I...,. k 4 14' / " • 01 4/0.47 al / .., .,.. di .I.: AP- - _ 4 I ...KZ_ .1(111: ( StAs larlia , Itt'zfrA 1■w11tt :i ilItj . 0 . ul / Z• . 1130_ � 2 t I 1 .� r , ,�9yw371. c,. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission • FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: June 21, 1996 SUBJECT: Riley Creek Ridge APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Hustad Land Company, Dean and Teresa Sundmark, William Schiebler, Doug and Juanita Swanson, Glenn and Phyliss Peterson ,Eugene Swanson, Steve and Darla Yerkes, LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres and Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77 acres. 3. Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 138 lots. 11 ..,, • 21--, •__: 4NAIII- (--11 . _3 111111.4 110 so".stc 166 o u)-- 111111 111 '41111 :AI:. • RAsipisi ROcilD --- 1.1 cj IMILIIII 1, iti Qum .,I 0JVII .24.I.1.I/T iH 81 Pi1i1 i1i1111 RI11I7 1rO. ?1,0.,1 11Cs CDlA"Re8l;4 44 6 4. :oz'• •.K.'2 H•it..IL- -L-..,-T-..E-.•,c0-(O aSXeiwZ-P' 5*r_!k...;:.51••-•,1•1—•E•...4,z 14 im!—t.31oa-i ... .. ..i.:. CORRAL gt " 4 , -0 -•s E R) - ) i- 21 VAL Y _RD . 6 = . N o zo z, a - al r , r......„.....„...........,.. ..........N. 44141 4 /.' _. rl 211 let ........ 4 4 •:*- ,_. .. a.... - Ill ce --- I• /---............ , ........... ..----- t- IA CED&Ft MILLS GOLF II $as VIN • C•IE• <4‘ • Z W I . ../ L...Avj ... 14 sell- 1 . a Staff Report Riley Creek Ridge June 21, 1996 BACKGROUND This site is currently guided Low Density Residential for the proposed single family lots and open space for Outlot B which is land adjacent to Riley Creek. The Comprehensive Guide Plan, as designated Low Density Residential, would allow up to 2.5 units per acre for a total of 142 units. DEVELOPMENT REQUEST The Developer is requesting approval for 138 single family homes on 62.77 acres of land at a density of 2.20 units per gross acre. The net density outside of the open space area would be 2.43 units per acre. The Planned Unit Development is a mixture of 80 lots proposed for R1-9.5 zoning and 58 lots proposed for R1-13.5 zoning. A total of 39 lots in the R1-9.5 District will require a waiver for street frontage less than 70 feet. A total of 14 lots in the R1-9.5 Zoning District would require a waiver from the minimum lot size requirement of 9,500 square feet. The Developer is requesting waivers from city code so that home cost could start at $180,000 per unit. Currently, the average new sale price of a single family home in Eden Prairie is $311,000. A mixture ofR1 9.5 single family lots, with lot size waivers, standard R1 9.5 single family lots, and R1-13.5 lots is similar to the 1988 Fairfield Planned Unit Development by Centex Homes. That Planned Unit Development approved in 1988 was 367 units at a density of 2.5 units per acre. That project contained 105 standard 13,500 square foot lots, 108 standard R1-9.5 lots, and 154 R1-9.5 lots with waivers for lot size and street frontage with the smallest lot being 8,000 square feet. The waivers from the City code for lot size and street frontage were requested by Centex Homes for an alternative life style and for housing cost In 1988 home prices started at $150,000.00. LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT The Developer's first proposal was 130 standard single family lots at a density of 2.07 units per acre. After initial discussions with City staff about providing housing under$115,000 per unit, the Developer revised the plans to include 40 multiple family units. Due to the narrow, unusual shape of the property, and the existing older neighborhoods, it was not possible to incorporate the multiple family units without creating transitional problems on the adjoining older neighborhoods and proposed single family lots in the subdivision. Staff then asked the developer to look at a single family development similar to Fairfield with a range of smaller lots with waivers, standard R1-9.5 lots and 13.5 lots so that some lower cost single family housing could be provided. PROJECT PHASING �3 • Staff Report C C Riley Creek Ridge June 21, 1996 This project contains a Phase I with 35 single family homes proposed for the R1-9.5 Zoning District. This land area represents the limits to which the property can be served by gravity sewer from a sewer line in Pioneer Trail. The second phase of the project will require a public improvement to extend a gravity sewer line from Mitchell Road and County Road 1 down Pioneer Trail to Eden Prairie Road to a lift station by Riley Creek. ROADS This project provides a road connection to Pioneer Trail, Hilltop Road, Valley Road, Cedar Forest Drive,and Eden Prairie Road. Road connection are needed to distribute traffic more evenly within the project and the surrounding areas. The proposed road connections to Eden Prairie Road are at locations where site vision distance is inadequate. Construction of Phase 2 would be contingent upon an improvement project to Eden Prairie Road that would improve site vision distance. The 60 foot right of way roads proposed to be constructed in Phase II should be final platted as part of Phase I. A total of 60 feet of right of way should be dedicated along Pioneer Trail. TRAFFIC The amount of traffic expected to be generated by this project would be 350 trips per day for Phase I and a total of 1,380 trips for Phase I and Phase II. The amount of traffic is consistent with the traffic expected to be generated based upon the Comprehensive Guide Plan densities. Most of the traffic within this subdivision at full development will travel north to Pioneer Trail. SHORELAND ORDINANCE The shoreland area is defined as 300 feet from the center line of Riley Creek. Provisions of the Shoreland Ordinance for lot size, lot width, and building setbacks apply if the lots are within 100 feet of the center line of the creek. Lot 2, 3, 4, and 5 Block 4 are considered abutting lots and must meet the minimum lot size requirement of 13,500 square feet, 120 feet at the rear building line, and a 100 foot setback. Lot 2 and 4 do not meet the minimum 120 foot requirement. The building setback on Lot 3, meets the 100 foot minimum setback requirement from the creek, however, the building pad depth is only 40 feet. Since the lot is wide, there is the opportunity to build a house wider than the 65 feet proposed, up to a total of 105 feet. The 100 foot setback also applies to 3 season porches and decks. Lot lines can easily be shifted to meet the 120 foot lot width. AIRPORT"B"ZONE Staff Report Riley Creek Ridge June 21, 1996 A total of 61 lots are impacted by the proposed Airport"B"Zone. These are Blocks 2, 3, and 4. As part of the long-range plan for the airport, MAC has indicated they would purchase this area if the airport is expanded. STORM WATER TREATMENT Since this project is being constructed in two phases, there is temporary storm treatment pond for Phase I and a permanent treatment pond based upon ultimate development of the property located adjacent to Purgatory Creek. The treatment pond in Phase II will pick up water from approximately 20 acres of land in the Hilltop-Valley Road area. The construction of the pond adjacent to Purgatory Creek must be at least 50 feet from the center line of the creek. This area is defined by City code as the shore impact zone. As part of the final plat for phase one, the developer shall provide an easement or outlot over the proposed ponding area. The final plat must also include a 40 foot wide outlot for access to the pond. TREE LOSS There are a total of 4527 caliper inches of significant trees which are a mixture of hackberry, ash, maple, cedar, pine, cottonwood and oak. A total of 2362 caliper inches of trees (52%)would be lost due to construction or construction practices. Tree replacement for Phase I and Phase II would be 1633 inches. In Phase I,there is a total of 274 caliper inches of significant trees. Sixty-four inches, or 23%would be lost due to construction. Tree replacement is 19.5 inches. The average tree loss for residential subdivisions is 30%. A reason for higher tree loss is is the loss of 1368 inches of significant Norway Pines that were planted by the owner as a shelter belt. The city forester has reviewed this area and determined that the close spacing of the pine trees and the overgrowth of shade trees,limits the long-term health of the trees. It is possible that some of these trees be transplanted on the property Due to a desire to save the existing home and provide public road access, the road must be located within shelterbelt. Steeper slopes to the south of this house preclude access from the proposed internal road which parallels the creek. ASSSESSMENTS FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITIES The Developer will be responsible for paying all costs of the road and utilities within the project. The • Staff Report Riley Creek Ridge June 21, 1996 Developer will be assessed for a share of the cost of upgrading Eden Prairie Road, the extension of sewer from Mitchell Road; and the construction of the lift station. Sewer and water can be extented to the Hilltop Road and Valley View Road area when an improvement project is made to extend sewer down Eden Prairie Road. Property ownwers would be assessed for subtiunk cost of Eden Prairie Road. If sewer is extended on Hilltop Road and Valley View Road, these properties would be assessed for lateral sewer. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS A five foot wide concrete sidewalk and an eight foot wide bituminous trail is required to be built along either side of the main residential collector streets (60 foot r.o.w.) in phase one and two. WILLIAMS PIPELINE Williams Brothers Pipeline affects some of the lots in Phase Two. The State Pipeline Ordinance does not allow homes in the easement. The Fire Marshal recommends that the pipe must be located in the easement and that new homes be located a minimum of 25 feet from the pipe or easement , whichever is greater. The plan shows no homes in the easement. HISTORIC LANDSCAPE PROPERTY A July 1994 report titled " Historic Landscape and Archeological Surveys In The City Of Eden Prairie" identifies the Eden Prairie Road Corridor(HE-EPC-079) as a historic landscape associated with transportation. This road corridor will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF THE HILLTOP AND VALLEY ROAD AREA The land to the noth and east of the site has the potential to redevelop when sewer and water are extended into the area with reconstruction of Valley and Hilltop Roads. The existing parcels north of Hilltop Road,because of home placement and ownership will require an east west road in the rear yards extended from Eden Prairie Road. Some of the lots between Hilltop and Valley Road are large enough to subdivide further, without new road construction. Lots south of Valley Road are large enough to sudivide further with a loop road if lots are consolidated, or cul de sacs like the Kopesky Addition on 82nd Street. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1(0 Staff Report C Riley Creek Ridge June 21, 1996 The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77 acres,Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 138 lots based on plans dated June 21, 1996 and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated June 21, 1996 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall: A. Provide a tree replacement plan for 1633 inches. B. Revise the preliminary plat to meet Shoreland lot width. 2.. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3.. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 4. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forrester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forrester prior to grading and tree removal. 5. The following waivers from city code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the R1-9.5 Zoning district: A. Lot Size waiver from 9500 square feet as shown on the preliminary plat. B. Street Frontage Waiver from 70 feet as shown on the preliminary plat. APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION July 8, 1996 • IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. RILEY CREEK RIDGE by Hustad Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres,Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 134 lots. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road. Beth Simenstad, representing Hustad Land Company, reviewed the revisions made to this project since the last meeting with the Planning Commission. There are now no requests for waivers or variances on the R1-13.5 Zoning District or the R1-9.5 Zoning District. As part of the revision,there are now 134 single family lots instead C Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 of 138,with 76 lots in the R1-9.5 Zoning District and 58 lots in the R1-13.5 Zoning District. The average lot size is over 15,000 square feet and the density is 2.13 units per acre. She reviewed the three alternative plans shown on the monitor. Foote asked what the expected starting price of the homes will be. Simenstad replied probably $200,000 to $225,000. Franzen noted that Staff recommends approval with the standard conditions on page 3 of the Staff Report. Staff was also comfortable with any of the three alternative plans discussed. They were looking at lot sizes and density similar in the surrounding area. The Parks and Recreation Department are planning for a 10-15 acre neighborhood park between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road. This will be obtained through dedication when land area around the airport develops in the near future. There are no local laws prohibiting airport expansion. MAC ordinance #51 is restriction on the aircraft as a 20,000 pound maximum take-off weight from the airport. MAC was asking for a proposed increase to weight limitation from 20,000 to 30,000 pounds. The City Council has gone on record that they are not in favor of increasing the weight restriction at the airport. Foote commented that if MAC purchased Zone B they wouldn't be able to develop on that land. He asked how the layout would look if that happened because he's concerned about the small remnant. Franzen said that in this case this remnant piece could develop on its own,or with property to the west. Ismail expressed concern about the safety issues for the snow removal or fire trucks on the cul-de-sac. Franzen indicated that cul-de-sacs are not a problem if they are short, and that's why the City has a maximum length on cul-de-sacs of 500 feet. Wissner asked how long the original cul-de-sac was. Sandstad replied it was about 700 feet. Clinton commented that ordinance #51 is the maximum take-off weight of 20,000 pounds. There is a proposal that the Airport Commission was looking at to increase the length of the runway. He asked if that was to deal with 20,000 pounds or 30,000 pounds. Franzen indicated it's for the 30,000 pounds. The public hearing was opened. 19 C C Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 Ken Grover, 16050 Hilltop Road, was concerned about Hilltop and Valley Road if this project proceeds. Simenstad responded that eventually they would be improved. This is a through street at the request of the City. Grover was concerned that he was not notified of any meetings regarding this project until today when some neighbors told him about it. Franzen explained the process of notification of residents,and noted that notices go out to residents within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property. Grover stated that he's not necessarily 500 feet away but this project effects him very much. Grover stated he was against the proposal because it would more than triple his taxes. He has his own septic and does not want sewer and water if the road improvements take place. If he is forced to get sewer and water, he does not feel he should have to pay for it. Foote asked if the residents are required to hook up to City water and sewer when the road improvements take place. Franzen noted not in all cases. The City usually builds utilities with a petition from the neighbors. There are no plans to extend sewer/water on Valley or Hilltop with this project. Byron Schmidt, 16071 Hilltop Road, stated that he was against this project and was not notified of any meetings either. He was concerned that he bought his home on a dead end street and it will now change. He asked if this development could rely upon just access off Pioneer Trail alone rather than having any access point going into any existing neighborhoods. Franzen explained the importance of having different ways of getting in and out of the property noting that there are seven different ways in and out. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation that the connection to Hilltop and Valley Road not happen until residents decide they want to pave the streets and put in sewer and water. Unless there is a petition from the property owners in the area, the City is not going to extend the sewer and water. Cynthia Jeppeson Dzimian, 16000 Hilltop Road, commented she was not notified of any meetings. She expressed concern about Hilltop Road itself as an access to this community because of the additional traffic it will generate. She was also concerned about the dangers because of the grade of the road and the way it merges on to Eden Prairie Road. She asked if there would be additional traffic controls at the intersection. Franzen replied Eden Prairie Road will be improved and showed what would happen on the map. Paul Dzimian, 16000 Hilltop Road, was concerned about what would happen to the new development if the runway protection zone goes into effect concerning Zone B. 26 C C Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 Lance Stover, 12112 Hilltop Road, commented he and his wife were not notified of any meetings. He asked for the reason why Hilltop and Valley Road were elected to make the connection to the development. Simenstad indicated they initially had cul- de-sacs. It was the Engineering Department that requested through streets. Franzen explained why the City wants to make the connections. Sandstad commented he would like to see connections for more than one way in and out of a neighborhood and there is also a concern for nonexisting fire hydrants. There are also public health issues related to why the City may insist on sewer and water to be put in such as contamination of water. Septics are more prone to fail than piped water and is very expensive when it breaks down. There are advantages to having a street that's paved and connected, but he also understands the concerns of the residents. Stover stated there has to be some compromise. It's been a happy neighborhood and largely because people enjoy living on a dead end street, and because there's less traffic and safer for children. Wissner was concerned about what the "founding fathers" had originally planned for Hilltop and Valley Road. Franzen replied the expectation has always been to connect. Susan Howe, 16301 Hilltop Road,was concerned about if the park would be located in the Zone A area. She was also concerned that they may end up with both the airport expansion and this development. Franzen replied the Parks Department has looked at the area currently outside of the zones which shows up on the last page of the Staff Report. It would be north of Zone A which would be closer to Hilltop and Valley Road. For certain, the first 35 lots of this project outside of the airport zone will definitely be there. The current plan purchase is by MAC and nothing would be built. It is unlikely that it would be both airport expansion and housing. Howe commented she heard MAC is not giving fair prices so the people are not happy about selling out to them. Franzen stated there is always a difference between what someone is willing to pay for versus what someone is willing to sell for. They may go before an independent board who would determine what the value of the land should be. Clinton stated that whatever issues MAC has with landowners on trying to purchase land is not an issue for the Planning Commission. Mr. Howe, 16301 Hilltop, was concerned about what type of pond will be near Riley Creek and if there will be a park trail to the north of Riley Creek trail. Simenstad 21 C- C Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 replied this will be a NURP pond. When they develop the first phase,they are going to do a temporary NURP pond that would be relocated in the second phase. When they finish the first phase and continue the second phase,they will do the permanent NURP pond. Franzen was uncertain about a trail along the creek. Lisa Diemento, 16100 Hilltop Road, asked who would be paying for the expansion of Hilltop and Valley Road. Franzen replied the residents will pay for the improvements that are out in front of their house. If there were some overwhelming heath reason or if the septic tanks were failing,then the City may go in and order it be done. The City generally waits until the neighborhood is ready to do improvements. Diemento was concerned that a piece of her property would have to be given up for expansion of the road and they are not compensated for that. Franzen responded that the City has a subdivision drawing in the office which shows there is a right of way dimension for Valley Road of 60 feet wide. If they improve the street, it would be within that right of way, not on private property. Diemento asked for a time frame. Simenstad replied it most likely will begin in the Spring if everything goes right. Diemento was concerned about the asking price of the homes. Simenstad said it will be single family homes starting at$225,000. Diemento asked if sewer and water were brought in and you are one of the residents who didn't want it,do you have five years to hook up to it. Franzen commented he was not sure and directed her to call the office and he would find out. Mike Clark, 16290, concurred with other residents about the safety issues if the cul- de-sacs are made into through streets. Bill Schiebler, 16749 Pioneer Trail, was concerned that many residents were not notified because they are further than 500 feet away. Clinton stated that the policy of who gets notified should be in question, not that the City Staff did not do its job. Scott Mace, 16150 Valley Road, commented that he also was not notified but is not within 500 feet. He suggested that this policy be changed because 500 feet is a little short and he is very much effected by this project. The policy should at least be within site distance of a proposed project. Mace was concerned about who would have the control to vote on road improvements with sewer and water. He also would like more assurance regarding the different issues. Clinton responded it would only be the individuals on the road that have control. Franzen noted that the City Council will make the final decision on all road connections. The City Council will take the 22 C C Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 Planning Commission and Staff recommendations into account, as well as the input from the residents. Mace asked if the residents would be assessed when the main sewer and water line is run down Eden Prairie Road. Franzen replied there should not be any assessments for main sewer and water. John Hale, 16205 Valley Lane,noted this is the future site of his home and he was not notified of this development. He was concerned about when he builds his home in the future should he bother putting in a well and septic system. Franzen stated that the only time frame they have is two to three years before the improvement project could take place as mentioned by Al Gray at the last meeting. Hale was concerned that the density was too high and wanted to know how that decision was made. He was also concerned about the quality of the homes in this development. Clinton explained that the zoning district of the subdivision determined how they arrived at the density. Hustad is the land owner and not the builder. They will sell the land to a developer who will have to build the homes according to code but not the materials. The Planning Commission can not control that. Pam Olsen, 9480 Dell Road, suggested having Hilltop Road set up like the road by Victory Church where it is closed off but is a through street for emergency vehicles. This way the residents could still have their dead end street and be opened if needed. Franzen stated he would ask for the City Engineer to make the recommendation on that. Ken Grover commented that it's an escape cost for the City to do what they want if they order in sewer and water because of health and safety issues. He said the City Council should take the residents'recommendation sincerely because they are the ones that have to pay for it. He also asked that all the residents more than 500 feet away be notified of any future meetings concerning this project. Ismail expressed concern that lots 1,2, and 3 are too close to the creek. Simenstad stated that they did it according to all the zoning requirements. Sandstad commented he supports the project and that there is some uniqueness to the character of Hilltop and Valley Road as they exist in their rural form of roadway. There may be some reasonable way to do both projects and not make those two roads look the same without sacrificing a lot. The Planning Commission does not deal with the airport issue at all but reassured the homeowners he will do everything he can to prevent the expansion. He believes the 1970's commitment to not expand the airport 2� C c Planning Commission Monday, July 8, 1996 any further should be enforced. Foote stated he supports the project and wants the roadway connections. He does not want to see this area end up with dead end streets. He believes there should be two entrances and exits to any development. Wissner said she supports the project as it stands with the recommendation about Hilltop and Valley'Road being on hold until the neighbors are ready. Habicht commented it's a good project which meets City requirements. It's important to have a concept of flow through the communities. The decision about the upgrading of those roads and the sewer and water is ultimately going to be as a result of neighborhood petitions. He supported the project. Ismail noted that he's not comfortable with the project because there are a lot of issues that need to be addressed. He was concerned about the density issue and the residents beyond the 500 feet boundary. He was comfortable regarding Phase 1 but not Phase 2. Clinton stated that he supports the project as it stands. He suggested recommending a motion to the City Council that they amend their policy for notification of residents within 500 feet. MOTION 1: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner,to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Sandstad moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hustad Land Company for Planned Unit development Concept review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres, Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77 acres,Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 134 lots based on plans dated July 5, 1996,and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, and add item 1B to the Staff Report recommendations that connected roadway improvements up to the easterly boundary where they would adjoin existing Hilltop and Valley Road could be made without the same improvements continued all the way to County Road 4. A discussion continued regarding the motion and no one would second it. Sandstad withdrew his motion. MOTION 3: Habicht moved, seconded by Wissner, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Hustad Land Company for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres,Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R 1-13.5 on 62.77 acres, Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 134 lots based on plans dated July 5, 1996,and subject to the recommendations of the Staff report dated July 5, 1996, with the addition to the Staff Report that there be no connection with Hilltop or Valley Road until such time as those roads are upgraded with pavement and paths in whatever form and that plans take into account the unique nature of the area. Motion carried 5-1 with the nay vote by Ismail. 2q • C . C Planning Commission Monday, June 24, 1996 B. RILEY CREEK RIDGE by Hustad Land Company. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept review on 62.77 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 62.77 acres,Rezoning from Rural to R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 62.77 acres, Preliminary Plat of 62.77 acres into 138 lots. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road. Beth Simenstad, representing the developer, reviewed her development proposal with the Commission. This project is a combination of seven separate property owners that have come together and there will be 138 single family lots. It has two phases but are only concerned with the first phase at this point. Phase one has 35 proposed lots. 2S C c Planning Commission Monday, June 24, 1996 She reviewed the request for frontage waivers in order to provide some kind of variety within a project that is all single family. They are attempting to provide smaller lots in order to allow homes to start in the $180,000 to $200,000 range. Tree loss is 52%overall,but would be less than 30%if it were not for the loss of a shelterbelt planted years ago by the owner. She addressed the concerns of the residents regarding storm water runoff and current drainage problems along the hilltop. She indicated that installing a storm system in this project would alleviate some of those issues. Franzen reviewed the Staff Report with the Commission. The key issue for the Planning Commission was if there was a benefit to the City by granting the waivers for smaller lots and street frontages. The proposal is similar to Fairfield(1988)by Centex Homes with a mixture of small and large lots. In 1988 the small lots were used so that homes could start at $150,000. The homes will start at$180,000 in this project. Part of this site is in the Airport B Zone. MAC has indicated they will purchase the property after the EIS is completed and if the airport is expanded. The approval of this project may prompt MAC to consider purchasing the B Zone now. The B Zone does not legally exist but is part of a Joint Zoning Board which has not been established. The Joint Zoning Board requires City involvement. The City told MAC it would not participate and MAC has not pushed the issue. He reviewed the two phase drainage plan. There is a temporary pond south of phase one which would capture storm water runoff from that phase until the balance of the property is developed. The Parks and Recreation Department recommended a five foot wide concrete sidewalk and an eight foot wide bituminous trail to be built along either side of the main residential collector streets in phase one and two. Staff recommended road connections because they are needed to distribute traffic more evenly within the project and the surrounding areas including emergency vehicles. Staff recommends approval subject to the recommendations in the Staff Report. 2l0 ( Planning Commission Monday, June 24, 1996 Kardell referred to the HPC's recommendation and was concerned about the timing. Franzen explained the historic issue indicating that prior to the City Council the HPC would make a recommendation about Eden Prairie Road. Kardell asked if there has been any discussion with the proponent about an easement on the open space to protect the back of those lots that back up to the creek. Franzen indicated there would be a conservation easement on lots with trees. Kardell was concerned about whether or not the City will require them to have an architectural diversity of homes like they did in the Fairfield project. Franzen indicated this will be required. Wissner asked if the developer had considered doing "cottage homes" or a single level home between $140,000 and $160,000 for "empty nesters". Simenstad commented they looked at a product that was available in Maple Grove. Wissner stated that when she saw how small the lots were she believed it would be a good place for"cottage homes" so they would have a diversity of ages in the development. She does not believe the homes will sell at$180,000 there was no justifications for the waiver, and there are not enough homes of a lower cost to be a benefit to the City. Foote opened the public hearing. Dave Rasmussen, 16275 Valley View Road,urged the Planning Commission to send the plan back to the developer to retain the character of the neighborhood. They purchased their home because of the rural character and are opposed to the removal of the cul-de-sacs. He was concerned about the safety of children and the increase in crime without cul-de-sacs. He believes the safety of the children outweighs the convenience for emergency vehicles. Bill Bearman,9630 Eden Prairie Road, expressed concern about the grading plan effects on Eden Prairie Road because of the site lines. He noted that the guide plan allows up to 2.5 acres per unit but that doesn't mean they have to max out the number of units per acre. He was also concerned about the plan during construction to protect Riley Creek. Bob Becker, 16597 Kenning Road,noted he would be the recipient of all the headlights that come out on Pioneer Trail. He expressed concern about the 2-1 C C Planning Commission Monday, June 24, 1996 increase in traffic and about the number of exits and entrances. He suggested creating a right turn lane on the north side of Pioneer Trail. He commented that this project being built along the airport line is misleading. Bill Schiebler, 16749 Pioneer Trail, noted he bought five acres of land included in the phase one development part of this plan and complimented everyone he has worked with. He believes he has the longest standing building permit on record for the City of Eden Prairie. He was concerned that he may possibly effect every person sitting in the room. He's not privy.to the number of ordinances or the date that it was enacted, but it was his understanding that in the late 1970's an ordinance was enacted by Eden Prairie prohibiting expansion northwest of the airplane strip at Eden Prairie Airport. This would then effect this development. He described the road to the west of the end of the runway noting that it needs a tremendous amount of fill. He was concerned about the draining conditions. He asked if Staff could find out the name and date of the ordinance,and how it's going to effect everyone. It is his understanding that if they are going to expand and supersede the ordinance existing,they would have to have public referendum to be able to establish this. His concern is that no one has been notified about any of this. Franzen commented the ordinance is number 51 of the weight restriction ordinance. Staff will check this out further. Susan Howe, 16380 Valley View Road,expressed concern about the increase demand and the open space in the park with all these people. She was concerned that this development does not include any park within for children to play. She referred to the report from the Minnesota Land Trust involving the cost of community services. They did a study and determined that the cost of services for developing all this land is greater than the amount of property tax revenue that will come in. She was concerned that this would put a greater tax burden on the City. She would rather see the airport expansion go through and have the traffic overhead than all this additional traffic from the project and pay $20,000 on top of that. Three years ago she put in a brand new well and septic system and was concerned that it may have to be removed. George Lundin, 16403 Valley Road, noted he owns three and half acres adjoining this property that Hustad is trying to develop. He would rather not Z8 C c Planning Commission Monday, June 24, 1996 see the development take place. He would like to see a plan that would include the large landowners so they don't have much impact from this development. He was concerned that his taxes are going to be so high that he will not be able to afford to live there. Robert Danielson, 16333 Valley Road,noted the development being proposed is at the back part of his property. He expressed concern that after this project is approved, Hustad Land Company does not go away and he will remain with his property without access from the back and no way to develop it. He would like to see some way to incorporate his property into the current phase of development. A resident residing at 16481 Hilltop Road, was concerned that this development is being considered in phases instead of all at once. Susan Clark, 16501 Hilltop, was concerned about the increase in traffic because her street is more narrow than the average street. She was also concerned about the dangers on the street. There was concern about added cost to the residents if the sidewalk has to be widened. The sewer, the widening of the road, and the increased traffic is not a benefit for her. Foote recapped the concerns as stated by the residents. Speed issues and traffic issues are always a problem not only with this development. He would like to see the ordinance concerning the airport expansion if one exists. Franzen commented regarding the airport expansion,he will have to research this item and get back to the Planning Commission. He explained how they develop adjacent to creeks and lakes has changed in the last five or six years. He discussed the reason for two phases instead of one for developing this site indicating it has to do with the way the property is served by sewer. Staff did not receive a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Department about open space on the property. He reviewed the sidewalk,trail and road system to be put in on the property. He also discussed the ways to improve the storm drainage system. He explained what would happen if the road connections took place and the impacts on the neighborhood versus cul-de- sacs. Staff will ask for barricades during construction. Gray reviewed the street connections proposed and commented he predicts seeing in the long term, a much different balance of traffic at the intersection of County Road 1 and 4 in the morning and evening rush hour as Eden Prairie develops. They will see the intersection upgraded to four lanes. The City can • 29 c Planning Commission Monday, June 24, 1996 live with cul-de-sacs but some back connections are important in terms of emergency vehicles and squad cars especially during rush hour. Staff sat down with public safety people and they favor road connections which will help the squad cars. Habicht expressed concern about connecting to Hilltop Road and Valley Road. The through roads would not go through on Valley Road or Hilltop Road until the improvements were made to those roads. Al Gray, City Engineer concurred. Gray noted they have not made a final decision to the extent of the gravel road. Gray added that making a physical connection to Valley Road and Hilltop Road could be made when those roads are upgraded. Habicht was also concerned that the accesses were too close together at 200 to 250 feet. Gray explained ifs a workable separation for the most part and explained why. Kardell commented the preservation of the creek area and open space is largely a positive. She is not an advocate of a city full of cul-de-sacs. The many street connections proposed is positive in theory and provides a better distribution of the traffic throughout the neighborhood. The improvement in the area overall regarding the storm drainage issues seems to be positive. She is not in favor of approving waivers on lots for homes that today are being told will sell for $180,000 to $200,000 when reality says they will wind up costing$225,000. She mentioned she drove to Hilltop Road and Valley Road and was concerned that those roads are not terribly conducive to traffic. Habicht was concerned about the gravel road and believes it's pliable to get the housing prices down without waivers. He would rather not set a precedent regarding waivers. He was concerned about the proximity to parks from this development. Franzen noted where the future parks and trails are located according to the Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Plan. Ismail commented he is not comfortable with the project and concurred with Kardell's summary. He was uncomfortable with the density. He believes the project is being rushed a little bit and recommends a continuance. Wissner noted she is not comfortable with the waiver issue and would like it reexamined. Franzen stated that the question is should the lot on the south side of Valley Road be combined and included as part of the application in the application for the zoning and platted property. He does not believe the City can require the developer to include adjacent property in the subdivision. Staff can certainly have the developer and City Staff look at multiple ways in which the lots off Valley Road could be developed with or without the property. Foote commented he is in favor of road connections and no variances. MOTION: Kardell moved, seconded by Habicht, to continue for two weeks to the July 8th meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 3C) MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Jullie, Chris Enger, Al Gray, Gene Dietz, Bob Lambert FROM: Mike Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 16, 1996 SUBJECT: Riley Creek Ridge - Questions raised by residents at the the July 8, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting that should be answered in a Staff Report to the City Council for August 6, 1996. Item#1: Notices should be sent out beyond the 500 foot range because the connection of Valley and Hilltop Road affects all residents on these streets. Item#2: Will Eden Prairie Road be upgraded prior to any improvements on Hilltop and Valley Road? Item#3: How much will traffic increase on Hilltop and Valley Road if the roads are connected? Item#4: Will there be sidewalks on Hilltop and Valley Road if the road is upgraded? Item#5: Will there be a City trail along Riley Creek? Item#6: What is the City's policy for sewer hookup? Do residents have up to 5 years to connect to sewer and water? Item#7: How is density determined? Item#8: Can Hilltop and Valley Roads be emergency vehicle access only like the road next to Victory Church on County Road 4? Item#9: Can the City force an improvement project on Valley and Hilltop Road? Item#10: Are residents required to hook-up to City sewer and water when road improvements take place? Item#11: Why does this project need seven access points? Can this project work if there is only an access to Pioneer Trail, Cedar Forest Road and Eden Prairie Road? 31 Item#12: Will residents be accessed for road improvements to Eden Prairie Road, especially main sewer and water? Item#13: If Hilltop and Valley Roads are improved, will there be additional traffic controls at the intersections? Item#14: Where will a future neighborhood City Park be in this area? Item#15: If Valley and Hilltop roads are upgraded in the future, will additional right-of-way be required from adjoining homeowners? Item#16: Who has control to vote on road improvements with sewer and water? Item#17: When will Eden Prairie Road be upgraded and when would sewer and water be available to Hilltop and Valley Road? Item#18: Is it possible that both the airport expansion and the development of the 2nd Phase for single family homes can occur? g:\memos'iley.crk 32- - MEMORANDUM - TO: Mike Franzen, City Planner FROM: Alan Gray, City Engineer DATE: July 29, 1996 SUBJECT: Riley Creek Ridge - Mike Franzen Memo of July 16, 1996 The purpose of this memo is to provide some helpful information in responding to questions raised by citizens at the July 8, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting regarding the above referenced project. The questions were outlined in a memo by Mike Franzen dated July 16, 1996. For clarity and reference purposes this memo will respond to the item or question numbers as they are listed in the July 16, 1996 memo. Ouestion No. 2: WILL EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD BE UPGRADED PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON HILL TOP AND VALLEY ROAD? It is unlikely that improvements to Hill Top Road and Valley Road would proceed improvements to Eden Prairie Road. There is currently very poor sight distance at the intersection of Hill Top Road and Eden Prairie Road. Eden Prairie Road should be reconstructed to improve sight distances along the alignment and Hill Top should be realigned slightly at its intersection with Eden Prairie Road to provide a 90° intersection. Item No. 3: HOw MUCH WILL TRAFFIC INCREASE ON HILL TOP AND VALLEY ROAD IF THE ROADS ARE CONNECTED? As proposed, the Riley Creek Ridge subdivision would have street segments connecting to the west end of Hill Top Road and Valley Road. It is proposed, however, that these street connections will not be opened until such time that Hill Top Road and Valley Road are improved with improvements at their intersections with Eden Prairie Road. We estimate that if the entire Riley Creek Ridge subdivision is constructed as proposed that approximately 200 vehicles per day may use Hill Top Road and an additional 200 vehicle per day may utilize Valley Road. Ouestion No. 4: WILL THERE BE SIDEWALKS ON HILL TOP AND VALLEY ROAD IF THE ROAD IS UPGRADED? Sidewalks would be included with street improvements on Valley Road and Hill Top Road if they are requested by the neighborhoods. Question No. 6: WHAT IS THE CITY'S POLICY FOR SEWER HOOKUPS? At this time the City does not require a single family residence to connect to sanitary sewer or water as long as their existing on-site systems are functioning. There is not a specific time frame in which a home must connect to sanitary sewer or water after these facilities are initially constructed in an existing neighborhood. Connection to sanitary sewer would be required if the septic and drain field system fail. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Division, Department of Public Works Ouestion No. 8: CAN HILL TOP AND VALLEY ROAD BE EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESSED ONLY LIKE THE ROAD NEXT TO VICTORY CHURCH ON EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD? Emergency vehicle assess only facilities would not be practical for these connections. The connection between Riley Creek Ridge subdivision and the existing Hill Top Road and Valley Road neighborhoods should be planned as full street connections, but not implemented until improvements are made on Hill Top Road and Valley Road, or there should be no street connections at all. Question No. 9: CAN THE CITY FORCE AN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON VALLEY ROAD AND HILL ToP RoAD? Current City policy is to study improvements to neighborhoods such as Hill Top Road and Valley Road based upon a request from a significant number of property owners to consider improvements. While the City may have authority under State Statutes to initiate projects, it is the policy of the City to proceed based on petitions from affected property owners. Question No. 10: ARE RESIDENTS REQUIRED TO HOOKUP TO THE CITY SEWER AND WATER WHEN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TAKE PLACE? Connection to public utilities is not required as long as the on-site systems serving the property are operable. Question No. 11: WHY DOES THIS PROJECT NEED SEVEN ACCESS POINTS? COULD THIS PROJECT WORK IF THERE IS ONLY AN ACCESS TO PIONEER TRAIL, CEDAR FOREST ROAD AND EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD? The Riley Creek Ridge subdivision could function adequately without connections to Hill Top and Valley Road. Hill Top Road and Valley Road are currently long dead end streets. They were not designed, however, to terminate as cul-de-sacs but rather to connect to roads that would be developed in the properties lying to the west of the existing neighborhood. While the subdivision pattern is different, the road connections proposed are consistent with the original design of the Eden Heights neighborhood. Question No. 12: WILL RESIDENTS BE ASSESSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD AND MAINLINE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER TO SERVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD? Collector roads such as Eden Prairie Road and subtrunk facilities such as large lift stations or larger sanitary sewer which serve significant areas are usually assessed on a lot unit basis. If Riley Creek Ridge is approved the City will request an assessment agreement with the development for these future costs. A portion of such costs may be assigned in the future to the Eden Heights neighborhood based on the lot units within the neighborhood. In accordance with City Assessment Policy, however, existing lot units served by on-site utilities and classified as homesteads are not assessed beyond a maximum amount as determined by Council. Currently that amount is $15,000 per lot unit for lateral utility and street improvements plus $520 for trunks. Question No. 13: IF HILL TOP AND VALLEY ROADS ARE IMPROVED WILL THERE BE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTIONS? Today Hill Top Road and Valley Road stop and yield to traffic on Eden Prairie Road. At this time we anticipate the same traffic control would be appropriate in the future even considering some additional traffic from Riley Creek Ridge neighborhood. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Division, Department of Public Works 3u Question No. 16: WHO HAS CONTROL TO VOTE ON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WITH SEWER AND WATER? The City Council makes these decisions with inputs from the neighborhood. The process ordinarily begins with a petition from property owners requesting the City study improvements. After a study is complete with cost estimates and assessments a public hearing is held to obtain input from all property owners. The Council then decides based on input from all property owners. Question No. 17: WHEN WILL EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD BE UPGRADED AND WHEN WILL SEWER AND WATER BE AVAILABLE TO HILL TOP AND VALLEY ROADS? Schedule for upgrading Eden Prairie Road has not been determined at this point. These improvements, however, would be necessary prior to the development of Phase II of the proposed Riley Creek Ridge subdivision. It is anticipated that the most efficient way to serve the Hill Top and Valley Road neighborhoods with sanitary sewer would be to drain westerly into the Riley Creek Ridge subdivision. Decisions regarding an expansion of the current MUSA Line as well as airport expansion plans may have impacts on these schedules. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Engineering Division, Department of Public Works 35� MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Mike Franzen, City Planner DATE: July 29, 1996 SUBJECT: Riley Creek Ridge-Answers to questions raised by residents at the July 8, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting . Item#1: Notices should be sent out beyond the 500 foot range because the connection of Valley and Hilltop Road affects all residents on these streets. The public hearing notice for the City Council meeting was expanded to include all residents living on Valley and Hilltop Road. Item #5: Will there be a City trail along Riley Creek? The Park and Recreation staff have indicated that the Parks Plan shows a location for a future trail along Riley Creek. This will likely be an aglime trail. Item#7: How is density determined? Density is determined by dividing the total number of units by the gross acreage of the property. Item #14: Where will a future neighborhood City Park be in this area? The Park and Recreation staff has indicated that a 10 -15 acre neighborhood park should be provided south of Pioneer Trail between Cedar Forest and Spring Road. The park land would be obtained by dedication. The area currently targeted for the park is between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road Item#18: Is it possible that both the airport expansion and the development of the 2nd Phase for single family homes can occur? Yes it is possible for airport expansion and the development of the second phase of Riley Creek Ridge. The following are potential scenarios. 1. MAC acquires all of Zone B with no residential development or a restricted density of 1 unit per 3 acres. 2. MAC does not acquire Zone B and extends runway. MnDot does not enforce safety zone regulations. Property develops according to the Phase two plan. 36 3. MAC extends runway. MnDot requires B Zone density restrictions of 1 unit per 3 acres. While MAC has indicated publicly they will purchase the`B Zone"as part of the expansion of the airport, the question remains as to when this purchase will take place, and if funding for the acquisition is available. MAC is about to begin the EIS process for the airport expansion. This environmental document should address the specifics regarding the Safety Zoning requirements, and any associated impact. Currently, state law provides for the creation of a Joint Zoning Board between MAC and the adjoining communities of any of its airports. It is through this Board that density of development within the Safety Zones is regulated. State law allows MAC to establish the zoning on its own if the adjacent community does not wish to participate. Since Eden Prairie has a Met Council adopted land use plan providing for permitted density,it does not want to participate on a Board which would place additional density controls on property owners. This could be viewed as a taking of property without compensation. MAC indicates it will not create a Zoning Board without Eden Prairie's involvement. This is the reason MAC has indicated total acquisition. g:\memos\riley.crk 3� A Petition We the undersigned residents of Valley Road in Eden Prairie submit the following petition to the City of Eden Prairie's Planning Commission and City Council regarding the planed rezoning and development by Hustad Land Development Company of the Riley Creek Ridge project. In this petition we ask the City of Eden Prairie not to approve the development plan to be submitted on June 24, 1996 to the Planning Commission without a change to the proposed street configuration for Valley Road. Currently Valley Road ends in a cul-de-sac extending Westward from Eden Prairie Road for a distance of approx. 1500'. This configuration is preferred by the residents for two reasons: 1). It minimizes the risk of injury due to collisions with motor vehicles due to the lack of any thru traffic. This is an especially strong concern for parents of small children. 2). National statistics show that dead-end streets have a lower incidence of the kinds of crimes perpetrated by non-residents. The crimes of greatest concern to Valley Road residents are burglary and child-abduction. In it's current configuration residents are able to recognize vehicles that do not"belong"in the neighborhood and will frequently investigate the presence and activities of suspicious vehicles. The increased traffic generated by the thru-street configuration suggested by City staff will essentially defeat our neighborhood watch program and make us more vulnerable to criminal activity. While we acknowledge that a few low-frequency city maintenance activities like snow plowing could be more conveniently conducted on a thru street, we feel that the compromise to the safety of our neighborhood that a thru street represents more than justifies the retention of the current configuration. Wally Hustad, representing the developer, indicated in informal discussions that he is not opposed to the existing Valley Road terminating in a cul-de-sac and can easily accommodate the change in his development proposal. We the petitioners ask that the City of Eden Prairie direct that such change be made before granting it's approval of the development plan. 6/21/96 C C Resident Name Signature Valley Rd.Address Date De"'e s kA-sseti [ Co 2.7S 6-21-qt '‘_,,(1,-( 4,(j) LA.e>/k)A0.4,r) / o/ /�/196 e / rn . _/- Z-d /6'-30/ �/7,6 p� a D00 Its t9.q G a 1 -% 1 j'aivv-L JeADA. • .,f-,-.,.� 1 b t et c( z,21-96 \fia/k4:4 ti\a^?) .41A%-e.-.‘ lb/01 •b—Qi-V , iehze:-. _ /'.4_ _4:.0,. j/crz 4- '-* 1 - -A-, .6k,,7,2,1 A,44..A-1-ktt-t-ii- jk-.iczss' EZ, i' erc) 6--.' 'V? 1 -b4(\), . R . ‘/< StL_ eia---- 1<_-Q;,r,9 Is;,?_co G-27--70 Z ck 2-6- c sores q � 16 C d-23/q— , ri ' rn- 0,,,,,/,vsd.___7,-,-.. .,, 16 335 C.47,AG 4/atiemQ. %t i-/D Li7 o1r;7 c , .. /is �16 , /-,? -/`( 'e yr ce- ,Cc/.1()(/; _2 /G C 7.23-?-0 4)4 /ca.,,, ,,/,v,,,,,,„c„ . LC 4 15-6 6'-a 3-7 Q�� 16TzO 6 -z3-, . , gsitte/- /63.5-0 6 -23 — (4", G. Aide-va..._ 1100-1 G- ibr-kD ELSEav t Co l op G it 3-1C: -tA �P 1 3A -14 ✓ /1 9-4. 74-4-2 te.#4.�,,� ?-zl-e,,} / 3 267 •-Z3--POR-3.=••-+-L 4 ,,,,,,:ck \,(Lvq). (, ---2_ 9(, -rk.iv,co q jcoe_vk EL: -774.03,x--...-1 te74: /64-so 2_3 3,k„..% , - EZ- --Lki,X._ ( 1>FcAK._ - I Aic_ tcoRc_-) ?-, ..1-u,q_1(c 4.-YhAr j Or;a-ems I&C-41 l Z 51JGrnc % 39 o1uLf Z9 19gCo N\ik{.Of Cc)v N U f_ K. , 60/0 ,K,Ds Tic) 114a- R1DC�C 1-itov . EvEtvWvv4 wARE PcD3P1\51-- OWT\)" ,S 'T1- : 15 u..3 &K��Ir`11 US VP oviZ Ro+ K)b To Ru-ol\/ oD �`T� T6-}& DEVe Lc)PK R.ND T1-115 ��Dl l lOfv e . UGI uvc) u t,D 16y•E- ova AW\mo c2 AND -ThE upvNca k) c - TAPpc Gov � -\N KtiSS�L 1cso2co \tc_ zsa 1/0 MEMORANDUM TO: Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Bob Lambert,Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities FROM: Stuart A. Fognager of Parks and Natural Resources DATE: July 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Supplemental Staff Reports to the June 21 and July 5, 1996 City Planner Staff Reports for Riley Creek Ridge BACKGROUND: The area that the development request is for is currently guided low density residential. The developer is requesting approval of 134 lots. Seventy-six of these are R1-9.5 lots and the remaining 58 are R1-13.5 lots. Because of the size of the site, as well as some considerations regarding sewer and water connections,the developer would only be able to construct initially 35 single family homes in the most northerly section that would be R 1-9.5 in lot size. NATURAL RESOURCES ISSUES: Tree Loss On the preliminary plan, the developer has indicated a total of 40 areas which contain significant sized trees. Because of the unique characteristic of the plantings adjacent to a couple of the existing homes, this site is not a "typical woodland." One of the homes has a rather large shelter belt planting which includes in excess of 250 Norway pines. The other home includes some old hedge row plantings of trees that parallel old pasture fence. These trees include a mixture of black cherry, small elm, and red cedar. The staff, in order to calculate the tree loss on this project, had to make some assumptions and basically has come up with a worse case scenario for tree loss on the entire site. The staff has estimated that there is a total of 4,527 diameter inches of significant trees. The trees on the site are a mixture of hardwoods and conifers, including the following: hackberry, green ash, red maple, bur oak, silver maple, black cherry, cottonwood,Norway pine, white spruce, and red cedar. The staff has visited the site several times and reviewed the project with the developer in the field at one meeting. The overview of the site is that it is pasture land and mixed with trees that have grown up along old fence rows. In order to make a determination of the number of significant trees on the site, the staff had to average out some of the fence row or shelter belt planting sizes. Field evaluation of these trees indicated that most of them were planted on a four-foot center and were planted primarily as a wind break to the house located along Eden Prairie Road. Currently, a number of these trees are showing signs of stress from being planted too close together. They also are being shaded by deciduous trees such as silver maple which have outgrown the pines. Without a consulting foresters recommendation, the staff has taken the position of counting most of these trees as lost in determining the overall tree loss on the site. With the total of 4,527 diameter inches of significant trees,it is estimated that 2,362 diameter inches would be lost due to construction. This represents a 52% loss of trees due to development. Mitigation for this amount of tree loss would be 1, 633 caliper inches. In the phase one portion of the project,there is a total of 274 diameter inches of significant trees. These trees include silver maple,green ash, red cedar, hackberry, and Colorado spruce. Sixty-four diameter inches of trees would be lost to construction or 23% of the significant diameter inches of trees. Mitigation for this loss would be 19.5 caliper inches of reforestation trees. The average loss for residential subdivisions has been approximately 30%. However, the estimation of this project is again based on a worse case scenario and the developer has agreed to mitigate the tree loss with 1,633 caliper inches of tree replacement should the entire site be developed. The problem with estimating currently is that part of the project is located in the airport "B zone" and its future regarding development is unclear at this time. If the airport expands, the B zone would be an area where housing would be prohibited and the airport would purchase the land to keep it free of residential housing. If this were to occur, the amount of tree loss would be decreased significantly because the shelter belt plantings would not be disturbed. If the airport expansion were not to occur and full development of the site was to take place, the staff would recommend a further evaluation of the shelter belt plantings to ascertain the best cultural practices in order to maintain their health. This basically would require thinning of some of the trees in order to make adequate space for the remaining trees to grow. NURP Pond Phase one of this project has a temporary NURP pond which would take care of storm water drainage from the initial 35 single family homes. It would be constructed according to the Engineering Department recommendations and would discharge water at a rate not greater than what commonly occurs on this site from normal rainfall. Phase two of the development includes a large NURP pond in the floodplain of Riley Creek to serve the entire 62 acre site, plus additional runoff that would come from Hilltop and Valley Roads. This NURP pond would be built according to City Engineering Department standards and would include a 40-foot wide access point for maintenance purposes. LI 2. Sidewalks and Trails The staff has met with the developer and indicated a desire to have both trails and sidewalks on the north/south and east/west collector streets within this development. The actual installation of these would be concurrent with development and the desire is to tie it into existing roadways such as Eden Prairie Road and the older residential neighborhood to the west of this proposed project. In addition, in the City's Comprehensive Park Plan, there is an indication of a creek valley trail which would follow Riley Creek in the vicinity of this project. However,because of the floodplain and other factors,the trail may have to exit the valley bottom to the east of this proposed project and become a trail paralleling the creek along the collector streets. Outlot Dedication • At the time phase two is implemented,the staff would recommend that Outlot B be dedicated to the City. This would enable the City to service the NURP pond without trespassing. In addition, dedication of Outlot B would further ensure that no development would take place in the floodplain of Riley Creek. Landscaping Currently, a landscape plan has not been submitted with Phase one or Phase two. The staff would recommend that a full tree replacement plan for 1,633 caliper inches of trees be submitted prior to review by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed twice by the Planning Commission,the first time on June 14, the second time on July 8. The result of this review was that all requests for lot variances have been removed and that the initial request for 138 lots was reduced to 134. The project was approved based 5-1 upon the recommendations of the staff report dated June 21, 1996 and July 5, 1996 by the City Planner. Staff would recommend approval of this project based on the content of those staff reports and the notations made in this supplemental staff report. RileyCreek/Stuart96 u3 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 A. Riley Creek Ridge Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 11, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner; and a Staff Report dated June 21, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Beth Simenstad,Hustad Land Company,reviewed her development proposal with the Commission. She noted the proposal is for 134 single family homes. The density is 2.13 units per acre. The price of the homes are estimated to be $200,000 and up. Most of the site is old pasture land mixed with trees. There are currently six existing homes on the property with one having a large shelter belt planting located on the north side of the homes. This shelter belt includes a lot of Norway pines which were planted by the previous owner. It has been assumed that the planting of the trees were planted as a wind break for the home on the north side. There are several trees within the shelter belt that are significantly stressed. The conclusion is they were planted so close together and the pines are being crowded out by silver maples that are overgrowing the pine trees. There is a total of 4,527 diameter inches of trees on the site. With Staffs worst case scenario because there was no tree inventory,tree loss is estimated to be at 52 percent and 2,362 diameter inches lost during development. Tree replacement is 1,633 caliper inches. Phase one has a total of 274 diameter inches of significant trees with tree loss of 23 percent. Mitigation for this loss would be 19.5 caliper inches of reforestation trees. There is a NURP pond temporarily located outside of the first phase. Phase two of the development includes a NURP pond in the floodplain of Riley Creek to serve the entire 62 acre site, plus additional runoff that would come from Hilltop and Valley Roads. The developer is comfortable with Staffs recommendation regarding trails and sidewalks on the north/south and east/west collector streets within this development. There is no landscape plan at this time but the developer will have a complete landscape plan before they meet with the City Council. Lambert reviewed the tree loss and shelter belt issues noting that Staff had to make assumptions because the developer did not provide a tree inventory. L Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 The tree loss could come down significantly if there was a tree inventory with recommendations from a forester. There is some thought that the area where the majority of trees are going to be lost will never be developed. It's located in the proposed B zone for the airport expansion. The Metropolitan Airport Commission indicated at this point if they get their expansion they intend to buy the B zone. There is no affirmation of that yet, and the Commission should review this plan as if it will be developed. Staff recommended to have both trails and sidewalks on the north/south and east/west collector streets within this development. The actual installation for these would be concurrent with street construction, and the desire is to tie it into existing roadways such as Eden Prairie Road and the older residential neighborhood to the west of this proposed project. In addition, in the City's Comprehensive Park Plan, there is an indication of a creek valley trail which would follow Riley Creek in the vicinity of this project. However,because of the proximity of rear lots to the creek, the trail may have to exit the valley bottom to the east of this proposed project and become a trail paralleling the creek along the collector streets. The trail is proposed on the south side of the creek. Staff also recommended that Outlot B be dedicated to the City or covered by a scenic easement. Dedication of Outlot B would further ensure that no development would take place in the floodplain of Riley Creek. Staff recommended approval based on the memo and the Staff Report. Wilson asked whether the developer considered any other alternative locations for the NURP pond because he was concerned about the grading into the creek. Simenstad replied that it was the best location they have found for the NURP pond. Jacobson asked if there was any rule that grading could not be done closer than 300 feet to the creek or river. Lambert replied there is no rule that says you can't grade within 300 feet of the creek. He explained that there is a Shoreland Management Ordinance and Staff has recommended no variances for the this project. Brown inquired how they arrived at the amount of replaced caliber inches. Lambert noted it was according to the formula that they use. It's a formula based on percentage of tree loss. LIS Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 Hilgeman was concerned about how wide the shelter belt of trees are including the conifers. Simenstad replied it's about 75 feet wide and 400 to 500 feet in length. Hilgeman commented that the tree loss is too high and was concerned that the developer did not provide a tree inventory. She suggested looking at other ways to reduce the tree loss. Koenig asked for a percentage of what trees may be transplanted. The owner of the home near the shelter belt noted there are about 300 new young trees. Simenstad stated they will transplant as many as possible. Koenig asked if they are able to transplant some trees, would they be included in the tree replacement or would that be separate. Lambert replied that they would count as tree replacement if the trees met specifications for replacement trees. Hilgeman commented she was uncomfortable approving a project where they have nothing in writing of exactly what the tree loss may be. She was also concerned that there was no landscaping plan and can not approve this without one. She was also uncomfortable approving part of a plan that might not even exist. She has a hard time approving any plan on a "good faith" basis. She noted there are a lot of things the developer can do on the shelter belt to preserve a great deal of the trees and really reduce the tree loss. Kracum indicated he would like some information in terms of how a shelter belt stacks up as a natural resource forest. He concurred with Hilgeman's comments and said that a landscape plan would be very helpful. He needs to know more about what a shelter belt is. Koenig expressed concern that the developer may dedicate 15 acres for open space but the planning report says to pay appropriate cash park fees. Lambert stated that the City is not requiring the dedication and does not accept undevelopable land in lieu of park dedication. Koenig was concerned about the NURP pond being located in the floodplain area. Lambert stated that the NURP pond has to be where all the water from the site can drain into. Water runs downhill and this would end up in the creek. They have to put it into the floodplain to capture all the water and treat it before it gets in the creek. Staff does not encourage a NURP pond in the floodplain if there is another way to do it. Brown expressed concern about being asked to approve both phases. L/6 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission . Monday, July 15, 1996 Lambert commented that it's better planning to do a Planned Unit Development showing everything because this way everyone is aware of what's going to happen in the future. Brown also noted he would like to see a landscaping plan. MOTION: Brown moved,seconded by Wilson,to recommend approval of the first phase excluding phase two until the Parks Commission is able to review the landscaping plan and tree inventory. Motion carried 6-0. B. Southwest Crossing 1996 PTJD_Concept Amendment Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 11, 1996, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a Staff Report dated July 5, 1996, from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Miles Lindberg, BRW Company, gave an overview of the request for concept amendment. He commented this is a two part plan. One part deals with tree loss and tree replacement on several remaining undeveloped parcels within the Southwest Crossing PUD. The other request deals with a couple of density transfers that are being proposed to make the PUD configurations consistent with the latest plans the developer has. The reason for the request is that when the PUD was initially planned and approved there was not a landscape and tree replacement ordinance in place. This request attempts to look at this in a comprehensive way across the whole PUD. With the approval of the plan that's proposed,the developer and landowner will have a degree of certainty in terms of representing what could be done with each of those remaining parcels in terms of tree removal, and also a commitment needed to be made on each of those parks in terms of tree replacement. The other part of this plan deals with the density transfer that attempts to make the PUD consistent with specific plans. Another important part of that request relates to the tree loss. Tree replacement is part of the plan for preservation of existing trees. The plan is for an original six acre wooded land preserve or conservation area on the hillside west of Golden Triangle Drive to be expanded to about 12 acres in size. This is a commitment as to one of the most significant and natural features that were part of this PUD. • They have provided the City with more detailed information related to the trees remaining on this site which is included in the brown booklet entitled, "Southwest Crossing PUD Tree Removal and Tree Replacement Plan". The 5 OPadan CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: prairie 8-06-96 SECTION: Payment of Claims DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Payment of Claims VI Checks No. 43848 thru 44509 Action/Direction: Approve payment of claims. COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM DIVISION TOTAL N/A $15.20 CONTINGENCY $6,633.50 GENERAL SERVICES $11,903.77 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS & TRAINING $4,892.45 DATA PROCESSING $90.00 FINANCE $18,415.06 HUMAN RESOURCES $2,524.32 COMMUNITY SERVICES $11,507.11 HOUSING TRNS & SOCIAL SERVICES $8,675.00 ENGINEERING $363.14 INSPECTIONS $1,831.82 FACILITIES $15,163.87 ASSESSING $958.09 CIVIL DEFENSE $191.92 POLICE DEPT $27,786.75 FIRE DEPT $5,597.31 ANIMAL CONTROL $1,720.00 PARK & REC ADMINISTRATION $34.74 STREET DEPT $101,482.26 PARKS $25,223.00 STREET LIGHTING $45,388.01 EQUIP MAINT $29,313.59 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $6,959.59 PLANNING $576.54 COMMUNITY CENTER $80,018.15 BEACHES $411.42 YOUTH RECREATION $17,027.89 SPECIAL EVENTS $2,443.86 ADULT RECREATION $2,228.92 RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $1,669.54 ADAPTIVE RECREATION $180.55 OAK POINT POOL $2,132.38 ARTS $3,966.27 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $172,817.37 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $125,848.05 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $286,836.66 CITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS $7,456.46 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $23,621.76 LIQUOR STORES $74,842.66 LS PRAIRIEVIEW #3 $70,823.73 LS PRESERVE #2 $25,446.64 TRUST FUNDS $97,594.19 WATER DEPT $253,705.31 SEWER DEPT $11,236.33 STORM DRAINAGE $15,905.68 AGENCY FUNDS $23,392.81 EQUIPMENT REVOLVING FD $71,370.91 $1,698,224.58* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 43848 $90.00 AMUSEMENT CITY SPECIAL EVENTS FEES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 43849 $340.80 BEAVER MOUNTAIN CHEMICALS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43850 $202.35 CIRCUS PIZZA CHEMICALS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43851 $5,093.40 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N INTEREST SUBSIDY TIF PV & ELIM 43852 $29,442.47 ELIM MANAGEMENT SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TIF PV & ELIM 43853 $30.00 FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES OPER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FINANCE DEPT 43854 $1,222.39 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 43855 $660.00 M.I.A.M.A. CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 43856 $185.00 MINNESOTA CLE SCHOOLS POLICE 43857 $1,120.00 MN TACTICAL OFFICER ASSOC SCHOOLS POLICE 43858 $137,560.29 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY ELECTRIC SEWER LIFTSTATION 43860 $1,434.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT UTILITY DEBT FUND 43861 $398.00 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS 43862 $317.97 SPS COMPANIES EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER SYSTEM MAINT 43863 $59,647.32 THIES & TALLE MANAGEMENT INC TIF TRANSFER FD 10 ORG 43864 $3,684.52 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SEWER LIFTSTATION 43866 $287.00 USTA C/O PAT COLBERT CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS/PARKS 43867 $115,953.18 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 43868 $950.00 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 43869 $14,726.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43870 $36,610.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43871 $10,896.10 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43872 $1,963.37 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43873 $641.35 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43874 $23.95 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43875 $19.60 THE WINE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43876 $38,022.90 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43877 $160.00 AL KRUEGAR LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43878 $26.00 ANN BRAU LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 43879 $96.00 BETTY JO HAGGERTY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 43880 $4.50 BETTY SCHAITBERGER SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43881 $135.00 CAROL DAVIS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 43882 $32.00 CAROLYN SHAUGHNESSY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43883 $18.00 CINDY WANG LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43884 $38.00 DEANN PARKER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 43885 $28.00 DEB TESKE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43886 $14.50 DEBBIE HERBST LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43887 $62.00 DEBBIE SELISKI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43888 $16.00 DELORES & ALVIN KRAUSE SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43889 $64.00 DIANE WELTER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43890 $4.50 ETHEL HOFFHINES SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43891 $74.00 HELEN GUNTHER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 43892 $91.00 HENRY HAVERSTOCK ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43893 $3.00 IOLIA JUHNKE SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43894 $86.00 JANE GUERTIN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ACTIVITY CAMP 43895 $45.00 JANE KRUSE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 43896 $31.28 JOAN AKIN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43897 $50.00 JOHN ZALESKAS CITY BUILDING RENTAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 43898 $25.80 JUDY BAURASSA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 43899 $6.60 JULIE TEATERS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43900 $8.00 KAMARA JOHNSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD KIDS KORNER 43901 $62.00 KIMBERLY FISCHER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43902 $86.00 KRISTIE SPALDING ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG DAY CAMP 43903 $45.00 LISA MOORE YOUTH RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 43904 $148.00 LORI GLADSTONE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG DAY CAMP 43 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 43905 $42.00 MARCIA NELSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ARTS CAMP 43906 $56.00 MARLYS BAGAASON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43907 $8.00 MARY DEE HICKS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43908 $35.18 MARY LEE GREENSPAN LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 43909 $130.00 MARY O'TOOLE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43910 $45.00 MARY REMAKEL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 43911 $36.00 MAUREEN FISCHER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43912 $39.00 MAUREEN MAGNUSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 43913 $23.00 MELANIE TEEMS LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43914 $24.50 MICHAEL & THERESA OCONNELL LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43915 $56.00 NANCY MERICKEL LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43916 $148.00 NANCY TARAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 43917 $8.00 NANETTE KEMPSKI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43918 $24.00 NAOMI MEYER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 43919 $66.00 NORMA WUTTKE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 43920 $56.00 PADMA DEVINENI LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43921 $16.00 PAM COPELAND ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43922 $17.00 PAM DODDS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 43923 $33.60 PAMELA VAN EYCK LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 43924 $24.50 PATRICIA HANSON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43925 $4.50 PATRICIA WALSH DOG REGISTRATION FD 10 ORG 43926 $45.00 PATSY ANDERSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 43927 $8.00 PATTY NEWLIN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43928 $28.00 PATTY PETERSON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43929 $86.00 REBECCA GIN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD DAY CAMP 43930 $28.00 RENEE MCMUNN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43931 $54.00 RENEE SANDQUIST ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43932 $53.14 ROBIN STEWART LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 43933 $8.00 RUSSELL PAYNE SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43934 $8.00 SAM LEVINE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43935 $6.00 SANDY DUFFY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 43936 $27.00 SANDY ELFSTROM ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43937 $3.50 SHARI TRITCH LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43938 $119.00 SHARON POEHLMANN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD DAY CAMP 43939 $32.00 SHERIE BERGER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43940 $30.00 SHERRY & WILLIAM BIXBY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 43941 $100.00 STACEY KERNS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ARTS CAMP 43942 $8.00 STEPHANIE CZERNIECKI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43943 $28.00 STEVEN SATHER LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43944 $18.00 SUE MCELVEEN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43945 $3.50 SUSAN BERG LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43946 $50.00 SUSAN CANDLAND ROUND LAKE PARK BLDG SPECIAL EVENTS 43947 $8.00 SUSAN NELSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43948 $27.00 SYLVIA KASK ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43949 $42.00 TERRI WALLER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ARTS CAMP 43950 $8.00 THERESA HARTSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43951 $24.50 THERESE O'CONNELL LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43952 $21.50 TIM PATTERSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43953 $85.00 TIMOTHY PELTIER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 43954 $28.00 TRESSA HUTCHINSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43955 $27.00 TRICIA DEVRIES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 43956 $30.00 TRISH BYERKERK ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 43957 $103.50 VALERIE GOSERUD LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 43958 $10.50 VERONICA THOMSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43959 $8.00 VICKIE SOCHA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS y COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 43960 $56.00 VICKIE WHITELEY LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 43961 $8.00 VICTORIA NIPPER SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43962 $26.00 VIJAY KRISHNA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 43963 $18.00 WALT LUSIAN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43964 $7.00 WENDY JOHNSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 43965 $48.95 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 43966 $300.00 ANDREW LACASSE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 43967 $1,008.69 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE FURNITURE & FIXTURES SR CTR OPERATIONS 43968 $20.00 BOY SCOUT TROOP 597 OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 43969 $79.61 BRUNSWICK BOWLING LANES SPECIAL EVENTS FEES AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 43970 $14.00 CARVER HEATING MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 43971 $2,056.48 DRISKILLS NEW MARKET MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 43974 $5.50 EDEN PRAIRIE LIONS CLUB OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 43975 $180.00 EDEN PRAIRIE ROTARY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 43976 $2,111.82 G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 43977 $25.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 43978 $8.00 HOKANSON PLUMBING BLDG SURCHARGES PLUMBING SURCHARGE 43979 $3,199.00 HONEYWELL INC CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT SENIOR CENTER 43980 $5,184.00 JASON-NORTHCO L.P. #1 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 43981 $500.00 MINNESOTA SHAKESPEARE COMPANY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 43982 $450.98 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 43983 $30.80 SUE BENNETT SYSTEM ACCESS-WATER WATER DEPT 43984 $205.00 TIMBER LODGE STEAK HOUSE AWARDS SOFTBALL 43985 $612.50 TOM SCHMITZ AWARDS IN SERVICE TRAINING 43986 $5,133.30 VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 43987 $200.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 43988 $152.26 ABBOT OFFICE SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 43989 $1,596.24 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE SEWER UTILITY-GEN 43990 $60.00 ALYSSA VOLLMAR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 43991 $79.00 CAREERTRACK SEMINAR CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 43992 $42.00 CITY OF RICHFIELD OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINT 43993 $120.00 CLAIRE HILGEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 43994 $60.00 DAVID HINRICHS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 43995 $224.00 EAGLE CREEK STABLES SPECIAL EVENTS FEES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 43996 $30.00 EDEN PRAIRIE BASEBALL ASSOC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 43997 $60.00 FRANK SCHRIBER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 43998 $34.65 GLS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POOL LESSONS 43999 $100.00 JEAN L HARRIS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 44000 $60.00 JENNIFER ORTH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 44001 $708.00 JIM STUKEL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44002 $455.13 JIM TORNUE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 44003 $60.00 JODI REEB MYERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 44004 $320.00 MN GFOA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 44005 $1,185.44 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIBUTING MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 44006 $52.50 RICHARDSON NATURE CENTER CHEMICALS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44007 $60.00 SARAH NEUNSINGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 44008 $472.00 SKILLPATH SEMINARS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 44009 $139.00 TODD TOMCZIK WAGES CONTRACTED FIRE 44010 $247.00 USTA C/O PAT COLBERT SPECIAL EVENTS FEES YOUTH TENNIS 44011 $556.05 VALLEYFAIR SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44012 $128.30 ANOKA CO GOVT CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44013 $662.81 CARVER CO CHILD SUPPORT UNIT GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44014 $300.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 44015 $8,370.50 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 44016 $545.55 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG S COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44017 $4,444.22 I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUCT-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 44018 $1,335.00 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44019 $332.00 MINN STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 44020 $227.42 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44021 $1,912.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 44022 $35.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 44023 $51,159.76 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44024 $50.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS PERA WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44025 $189.00 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 44026 $23.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44027 $12,934.65 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44028 $16,902.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44029 $117.24 GRIGGS COOPER & CO BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44030 $14,950.05 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44031 $469.20 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 44032 $165.20 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 44033 $8,631.60 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44034 $74.31 BADGE A MINIT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SENIOR AWARENESS N16 44035 $1,123.58 BAILEY NURSERIES INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL MILLER PARK 44036 $500.00 BALLET WORKS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 44037 $6.37 BARB NORDLEY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ARTS 44038 $40.00 BIG BOBS REPIR SHOP & SONS INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS ESCROW 44039 $49.50 CHRIS ENGER USE OF PERSONAL AUTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 44040 $1,500.00 CITY OF ST PAUL SCHOOLS POLICE 44041 $350.00 DEE J TRAUDT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 44042 $85.00 ELAINE PARKER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 44043 $40.00 EMMETT J STARK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 44044 $22,500.00 FINEST FOOD SERVICE DEPOSITS ESCROW 44045 $54.00 FIRE CHIEF DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 44046 $124,414.05 FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC SALES-WATER METERS 2ND SHEET ICE DEBT 44047 $3,944.89 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44048 $17.48 KEITH MOOREHOUSE TELEPHONE COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 44049 $2,053.89 KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 44050 $666.10 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44053 $46.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSES & TAXES WATER UTILITY-GEN 44054 $19.45 NATALIE SWAGGERT CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 44055 $153.76 NEBCO EVANS DISTRIBUTING MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 44056 $285.00 NFPA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 44057 $40.00 PAUL CARLSON LICENSES & TAXES WATER UTILITY-GEN 44058 $2,087.00 POOL CONSTRUCTION INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 44059 $733.69 PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 44060 $300.00 PROP HOPE LOAN RECEIVABLE HOPE LOAN PROGRAM 44061 $400.00 RAGAMALA MUSIC & DANCE THEATRE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 44062 $10.00 RAMSEY FOUNDATION/CME CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 44063 $562.00 REGENCY TOWNHOMES PLUMBING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 44064 $20,000.00 RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WT IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS US FISH GRANT 44065 $130.01 RITZ CAMERA PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 44066 $200.00 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44067 $342.59 SHERI L MOONEN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JUNIOR AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 44068 $379.64 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 44069 $336.00 SPECIAL OPS TRAINING CORP SCHOOLS POLICE 44070 $69.00 THE NATIVITY-HAUMC SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 44071 $540.40 TRACY SPANGRUD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 44072 $1,679.04 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 44073 $95.00 WOODDALE BLDERS SYSTEM ACCESS-WATER FD 10 ORG / COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44074 $185.16 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE INSPECTION-ADM 44075 $40.80 AISLINN GROEN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 44076 $75.00 FEDEX POSTAGE GENERAL 44077 $60.00 GRETCHEN PICK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARTS CAMP 44078 $369.96 HILLARY DEPARDE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 44079 $195.23 JEAN L HARRIS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 44080 $62.00 JOSEPH BERRY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD SKI TRIPS/WINTER CAMP 44081 $118.16 LYNDELL F FREY USE OF PERSONAL AUTO PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 44082 $228.00 MARY FREY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 44083 $185.00 MINNESOTA CLE SCHOOLS POLICE 44084 $101,995.67 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 44085 $150.00 NWTA JR TEAM TENNIS TOURNEY SPECIAL EVENTS FEES YOUTH TENNIS 44086 $63.37 STEPHANIE CHADWICK OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 44087 $390.15 VALLEYFAIR SPECIAL EVENTS FEES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 44088 $750.00 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 44089 $112.00 AMY LENDT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG DAY CAMP 44090 $28.00 ANN ANDERSON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44091 $80.00 ANN SCHUSTER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44092 $48.00 BARBARA FREEMAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 44093 $24.00 BECKY LARSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44094 $42.00 CANDYCE MAIRS LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44095 $24.00 CATHY POTTEBAUM ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44096 $56.00 CHRISTIE MILLER LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44097 $28.00 CINDY HORGAN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44098 $25.00 CLAUDIA TORNQUIST LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44099 $56.00 CYNTHIA CHRISTENSEN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44100 $24.00 CYNTHIA ZIPF ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44101 $48.00 DEAN TRUITT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44102 $17.00 DEBBI STOCCO ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH TENNIS 44103 $48.00 DEBBIE BRADLEY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 44104 $24.00 DEBBI LARSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44105 $45.00 DEBBY BRADLEY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 44106 $49.00 DEBRA LUECK LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44107 $24.00 DELLA HAYDEN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44108 $84.00 DENISE MURPHY LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44109 $106.00 DENNI LESTER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44110 $91.00 DOLORES KUPKA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44111 $24.00 DONNA SCHULTZ ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44112 $105.00 ELLEN CRUMP LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44113 $112.00 ERIN SANFORD LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44114 $33.00 ESTER JONES SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 44115 $56.00 G NAKRANI LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44116 $23.72 GAIL MUELLER LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 44117 $158.00 GERALYNN BLUHM ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG DAY CAMP 44118 $33.00 GLADYS SIMENSON SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 44119 $4.00 HELEN MCCARTY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44120 $3.50 HUONG HUOT LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44121 $31.13 JACK NORQUAL C/C FACILITIES RENTAL ICE ARENA 44122 $48.00 JACQUELINE MILLER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 44123 $24.00 JANE BURNETT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD YOUTH ATHLETICS 44124 $24.00 JAYNE STUBBINS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44125 $128.00 JEAN KAPSNER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44126 $56.00 JONI GRIESS LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44127 $45.00 JUDY BAURASSA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 44128 $48.00 JUDY GELLING ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44129 $28.00 JUDY SCHROEDER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44130 $56.00 JULI DURDA LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44131 $24.00 JULIE HALLAUER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD YOUTH ATHLETICS 44132 $55.66 JULIE TEATERS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44133 $240.00 KAREN JAMISON C/C FACILITIES RENTAL ICE ARENA 44134 $24.50 KAREN SERRA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44135 $24.00 KAROL 0 LEARY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44136 $70.80 KATHLEEN KIENTZLE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON ADVENTURE 44137 $6.00 KATHRYN MANZKE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44138 $50.00 KATHRYN NELSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44139 $24.00 KATHY KELLY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44140 $24.00 KEN DODGE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44141 $225.00 KEVIN TESTER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44142 $24.00 KIMBERLY MILLER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44143 $16.00 LAURA BEAUCHAMP ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 44144 $48.00 LAURA RODEKUHR ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44145 $40.00 LAURIE HORN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44146 $32.00 LAVERNE ANDERSON SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 44147 $6.00 LEO BULGER LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44148 $52.00 LESLIE BECKER LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 44149 $24.00 LINDA LARSEN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44150 $75.00 LISA PAPPO LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44151 $28.00 LORI EVENSTAD LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44152 $24.00 LYN BERGLUND ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD YOUTH ATHLETICS 44153 $15.85 LYNETTE GUST ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 44154 $24.50 MARGRET WELCH LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44155 $90.00 MARIE BRAU YOUTH RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 44156 $24.00 MARY ANNE IVERSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44157 $24.00 MARY BARE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44158 $28.00 MARY BETH JOHNSON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44159 $7.00 MARY BETH SCHULKE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44160 $28.00 MARY DURAND LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44161 $56.00 MARY HART LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44162 $45.00 MARY JANE HEINEN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 44163 $24.00 MARY NEUMAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44164 $28.00 MEERA PRANAY LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44165 $86.00 NANCY BERRYMAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG ACTIVITY CAMP 44166 $28.00 PAM CLARK LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44167 $28.00 PAT GULBRANDSEN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44168 $9.00 PAULA MCGOUGH LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44169 $24.00 PEG DITTY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD YOUTH ATHLETICS 44170 $71.00 PEGGY INGBER ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 44171 $56.00 PHILIP ROSE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44172 $78.00 ROBERT PRINCE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD ARTS CAMP 44173 $24.00 SARA ROSOL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROD YOUTH ATHLETICS 44174 $24.00 SARA WETZIG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44175 $24.00 SHERLY OTTERSON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44176 $11.00 SHIGEKO OKUTANI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 44177 $24.00 STACY MONAHAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44178 $46.00 STEVE LEENAY LESSONS/CLASSES RILEY LAKE-BEACH 44179 $48.00 SUE ELDRIDGE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 44180 $44.00 SUE ZALESKAS LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44181 $51.00 SUSAN KOZLOWSKI LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44182 $6.00 TAMARA WILDE LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 44183 $56.00 TERRI TOMLINSON LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS V COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44184 $74.00 THERESE LLASEY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 44185 $56.00 THERESE O'CONNELL LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 44186 $26.00 VIET NGUYEN LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 44187 $24.00 WAYNE THAEMERT ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG YOUTH ATHLETICS 44188 $2,597.65 CITY OF RICHFIELD OTHER EQUIPMENT STREET MAINT 44189 $81.60 JIM ZAIC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS INSPECTION-ADM 44190 $240.00 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG MISC BUSINESS PERMIT 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 44191 $106,967.92 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC SEWER LIFTSTATION 44194 $143.13 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER EQUIPMENT RENTAL MILLER PARK 44195 $258.00 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINT 44196 $338.12 AARCEE FURNITURE & FIXTURES OAK POINT OPERATIONS 44197 $31,300.00 ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES INC OTHER EQUIPMENT CC CAPITAL OUTLAY 44198 $290.97 ADVANCED ERGONOMICS FURNITURE & FIXTURES ASSESSING-ADM 44199 $76.25 ALPINE LANDSCAPING BUILDING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 44200 $3,558.30 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING I PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER STORAGE-BAKER RD 44201 $17,362.62 AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MILLER PK K32 44202 $218.08 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44203 $1,382.99 AMERICAN RED CROSS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES POOL LESSONS 44204 $599.60 AMERIDATA INC STATION IMPROVEMENTS COMMUNITY SERVICES 44205 $783.75 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 44206 $4,757.30 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING STARING LAKE CONCERT 44207 $126.74 APRES REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES VOLLEYBALL 44208 $395.62 AQUA ENGINEERING INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS FIRE STATION #3 44209 $15.95 ARLYCE LINDSOE MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44210 $1,592.18 ASPEN REACH EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44211 $538.00 AT&T GLOBAL INFORMATION SOLUTI REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 44212 $157.05 AUTO ELECTRIC SERVICE OF BLOOM EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44213 $731.82 AVR INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 44214 $364.56 B & S TOOLS EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44215 $328.45 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44216 $1,249.24 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44217 $250.37 BEACON BALLFIELDS-DIV LODESTAR OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 44218 $211.94 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 44219 $522.29 BELLBOY CORPORATION MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 44220 $649.65 BENIEK LAWN SERVICE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINT 44221 $6,769.73 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC DEPOSITS ESCROW 44222 $92.25 BENTEC ENGINEERING CORP CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SEWER LIFTSTATION 44223 $1,068.97 BIFFS INC WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINT 44224 $100,164.29 BLACK & VEATCH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 44225 $10.00 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 44226 $426.05 BLUE BELL ICE CREAM MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS 44227 $826.94 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAFKO 2ND ADDITION 44228 $202.00 BRENDA JERDE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44229 $25.00 BRENDA UTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44230 $109.79 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44231 $48.35 BROADWAY AWARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POOL SPECIAL EVENTS 44232 $377.01 BROCK WHITE CO LLC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 44233 $866.60 BRW INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DELL ROAD 44234 $150.50 BURNSVILLE HEATING MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 44235 $435.72 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 44236 $20,899.56 CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT AUTOS P/R REVOLVING FD 44237 $410.03 CARSONITE INTL CORP OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL MILLER PARK 44238 $294.72 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44239 $1,682.42 CENTRAIRE INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS SENIOR CENTER 44240 $335.03 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 9 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44241 $6.38 CHERYL CROWLEY MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44242 $290.00 CHRIS JESSEN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44243 $4,673.14 CIC SYSTEMS OFFICE EQUIPMENT WESTGATE PK K41 44244 $1,720.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 44245 $305.00 CITY OF EDINA CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE 44246 $950.83 CLEAN SWEEP INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINT 44247 $1,240.00 CLT FLOOR COVERING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 44248 $1,183.56 CLUTS 0 BRIEN STROTHER ARCHITE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 44249 $15.00 COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 44250 $119.51 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS TRAINING SUPPLIES SAFETY 44251 $150.00 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL IN SERVICE TRAINING 44252 $252.98 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT TRAINING SUPPLIES SAFETY 44253 $4,500.00 CORNERSTONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 44254 $284.61 CORPORATE AUTO RENTALS INC TRANSPORTATION TEEN WORK PROGRAM 44255 $16.84 CROWN MARKING INC OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 44256 $3,085.33 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44257 $269.89 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 44258 $404.30 CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44259 $18,267.40 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44260 $156.80 D C HEY COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSPECTION-ADM 44261 $200.46 DALCO CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44262 $306.00 DAN DESAULNIERS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44263 $81.49 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO TRAINING SUPPLIES FIRE 44264 $207.68 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44265 $1,277.00 DECORTEC INCORPORATED REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 44266 $404.56 DELEGARD TOOL CO SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44267 $27.00 DEM CON LANDFILL INC WASTE DISPOSAL STREET MAINT 44268 $24,275.00 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44269 $990.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CONTRACTED COMM MAINT POLICE 44270 $1,788.00 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44271 $644.36 DYNA SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44272 $4,385.14 E F JOHNSON CO POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE 44273 $180.00 E-Z-GO TEXTRON EQUIPMENT RENTAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 44274 $1,002.34 EARL F ANDERSON SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNALING 44275 $1,020.78 EASTMAN KODAK CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 44276 $181.06 ECOLAB INC CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT EPCC MAINTENANCE 44277 $77.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44278 $58.25 EDEN PRAIRIE FLORIST OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 44279 $261.15 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44280 $2,500.00 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING TRANSP & SOCIAL SERV 44281 $212.50 EDINA S W PLUMBING CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS/PARKS 44282 $18,000.00 EIDE HELMEKE PLLP AUDIT & FINANCIAL FINANCE DEPT 44283 $525.00 EKLUNDS TREE AND BRUSH DISPOSA WASTE DISPOSAL TREE REMOVAL 44284 $511.02 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT PARTS STORM DRAINAGE 44285 $65.19 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 44286 $16.40 ELYCE KASTIGAR MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44287 $866.95 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC EQUIP TESTING & CERTIFICATION FIRE 44288 $323.94 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CIVIL DEFENSE 44289 $6,175.00 EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING TRANSP & SOCIAL SERV 44290 $103.31 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44291 $270.00 EUGEN R ELLEFSON OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44292 $64.34 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL 44293 $950.00 F F JEDLICKI INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STORM DRAINAGE 44294 $84.38 FAUVER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44295 $3,380.00 FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT IU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44296 $154.07 FERRELLGAS MOTOR FUELS ICE ARENA 44297 $398.99 FIBRCOM COMMUNICATIONS POLICE 44298 $602.25 FINLEY BROS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RILEY LAKE 44299 $44.20 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 44300 $1,080.00 FRANK LAVALLE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44301 $170.87 G & K SERVICES DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING & UNIFORMS STREET MAINT 44302 $90.00 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT INFORMATION SYSTEM 44303 $42.34 GARRETT SMELTZER USE OF PERSONAL AUTO EPCC MAINTENANCE 44304 $5,750.45 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 44305 $702.00 GARY ISAACS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44306 $91.00 GETTMAN COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44307 $200.00 GLEN LITFIN TRANSFER & EXCAVAT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44308 $138.06 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES TRAINING SUPPLIES SAFETY 44309 $14.50 GOLD COUNTRY INC SIGNATURE CON CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 44310 $2,372.39 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINT 44311 $276.50 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44312 $353.20 GRAFIX SHOPPE NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44313 $824.20 GROVE NURSERY CENTER LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL RILEY LAKE 44314 $284.93 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MILLER PARK 44315 $117.20 HACH COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44316 $71.38 HANCE COMPANIES NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44317 $5,666.58 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RIVERVIEW RD 44318 $100.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFI OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ASSESSING-ADM 44319 $81.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE ENGINEERING DEPT 44320 $1,035.36 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 44321 $2,345.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 44322 $268.75 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 44323 $179.74 HENNEPIN COUNTY WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINT 44324 $1,998.00 HONEYWELL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44325 $3,931.08 HORIZONGRAPHICS PRINTING COMMUNITY SERVICES 44326 $59.00 IKI INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 44327 $269.73 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44328 $18.31 INTERSTATE BEARING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44329 $211.07 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44330 $31,579.25 J CRAFT INC AUTOS P/W REVOLVING FUND 44331 $49.52 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44332 $2,826.73 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 44333 $528.89 JC PENNEY CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 44334 $2,722.81 JEANE THORNE INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 44335 $42.56 JEFF ELWELL USE OF PERSONAL AUTO EPCC MAINTENANCE 44336 $25.00 JEFF TOWEY SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS ADAPTIVE RECREATION 44337 $7.71 JING CHAN MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44338 $780.50 JOEL ENTERPRISES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44339 $291.38 JOEL WESTACOTT WAGES PART TIME COMMUNITY SERVICES 44340 $398.00 JOHN MICHELAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44341 $75.00 KAROL ROCKLER INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44342 $50.00 KELLY NELSON INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44343 $90.00 KEN JOHNSON INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44344 $16.55 KIM KLITZKE MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44345 $1,023.95 KNOX BUILDING MATERIALS BUILDING MATERIALS EDENVALE PARK 44346 $4,016.88 KODET ARCHITECTURAL GRP LTD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PW STORAGE FACILITY 44347 $69.68 KOSS BUILDING MATERIALS MILLER PARK 44348 $115.31 KRIS KROWECH SCHOOLS SAFETY 44349 $116.29 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44350 $2,469.30 LAKE REGION VENDING MISC TAXABLE PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 II COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44351 $20.25 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44352 $115.04 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44353 $187.32 LAND OF LAKES TITLE CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44354 $9,463.75 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TEMAN PROPERTY 44355 $54.04 LAURIE HELLING USE OF PERSONAL AUTO RECREATION ADMIN 44356 $10,291.72 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS INSURANCE STORM DRAINAGE 44357 $1,144.00 LEE RAY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44358 $179.29 LESCO INC CHEMICALS STREET MAINT 44359 $539.22 LIQUID CARBONIC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44360 $16.50 MARKS HWY 5 AMOCO MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44361 $441.98 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 44362 $100.00 MEDICINE LAKE LINES TRANSPORTATION ADULT PROGRAM 44363 $506.43 MENARDS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT FIRE STATION #3 44365 $140.00 METRO RESOURCES UNLIMITED OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINT 44366 $4,401.82 METRO SALES INCORPORATED CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 44367 $201.33 MID AMERICA PLACTICS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44368 $381.55 MIDAS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44369 $291.48 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44370 $3,981.14 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION GRAVEL STREET MAINT 44371 $647.40 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 44372 $649.50 MIDWEST COCA COLA BTLG CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 44373 $225.00 MIDWEST FIRE PROTECTION INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS EATON BLDG 44374 $10.00 MINN DEPT OF TRANSPORATION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 44375 $138.00 MINN REAL ESTATE JOURNAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL IN SERVICE TRAINING 44376 $54.46 MINNCOMM PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WATER UTILITY-GEN 44377 $223.12 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ENGINEERING DEPT 44378 $1,019.76 MINNESOTA BUSINESS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 44379 $70.91 MINNESOTA CONWAY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 44380 $46.00 MINNESOTA COUNTIES INS TRUST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 44381 $17.87 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY CHEMICALS STREET MAINT 44382 $1,461.18 MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING INSPECTION-ADM 44383 $206.60 MMC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 44384 $11.18 MN TROPHIES & GIFTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 44385 $398.38 MONTGOMERY KONE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44386 $700.64 MOORE MEDICAL CORP SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 44387 $12,057.07 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO AUTOS P/R REVOLVING FD 44388 $191.50 MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44389 $960.00 NATHAN D BUCK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44390 $293.55 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 44391 $2,196.63 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44392 $63.88 NORTHERN NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44393 $185.00 NRPA PUBLICATIONS CENTER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 44394 $9.84 NU CHAN MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44395 $76.68 OHLIN SALES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 44396 $17.10 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44397 $110.00 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR GENERAL 44398 $3,266.38 PALM BROTHERS OFFICE EQUIPMENT EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 44399 $150.00 PAM SCHWEITZER INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 44400 $64.71 PAPER WAREHOUSE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 44401 $22.16 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV FIRE 44402 $865.50 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HEALTHSYS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 44403 $4,470.25 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT SEWER SYSTEM MAINT 44404 $193.20 PEPSI COLA COMPANY BEER 6/12 SKATING RINKS 44405 $144.00 PETER SMITH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 44406 $269.06 PH WAREHOUSE SALES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT I2 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44407 $520.30 PINK COMPANIES OFFICE EQUIPMENT GENERAL BLDG FACILITIES 44408 $681.76 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 44409 $69.63 PLYMOUTH SUPPLY COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ROUND LAKE 44410 $195.00 PORTICO COMPUTERS II INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 44411 $504.25 PORTOLITE PRODUCTS NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44412 $4,793.78 POWERTEX SPORTSWEAR INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 44413 $418.16 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44414 $188.50 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINT 44415 $159.27 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 44416 $90.63 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 44417 $718.36 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC OFFICE EQUIPMENT POLICE 44418 $147.80 PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING CONTRACTED STRIPING TRAFFIC SIGNALING 44419 $45.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 44420 $105.44 PRO SOURCE FITNESS POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE FORFEITURE-DRUGS 44421 $6,516.98 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SEWER LIFTSTATION 44422 $780.91 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL FIRE STATION #1 44423 $54.24 RADIO SHACK CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 44424 $200.01 RAINBOW FOODS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL REC SUPERVISOR 44425 $188.59 RAPIT PRINTING PRINTING COMMUNITY SERVICES 44426 $319.48 REBS MARKETING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER ACCTG 44427 $90,487.50 REHBEIN INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIME SLUDGE 44428 $798.75 RESCUE ONE INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 44429 $306.98 RESPOND SYSTEMS NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44430 $474.46 RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS FURNITURE & FIXTURES OAK POINT LESSONS 44431 $91.70 RICCAR HTG & AC MECHANICAL PERMIT FD 10 ORG 44432 $303.53 RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING ASPHALT STREET MAINT 44433 $626.86 RICOH CORPORATION CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 44434 $11,581.63 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FLYING CLOUD SANITARY SEWER 44435 $786.24 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44436 $10,752.89 RINK SYSTEMS INC OTHER EQUIPMENT CC CAPITAL OUTLAY 44437 $325.89 ROAD RESCUE INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44438 $27.10 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44439 $219.92 SAFETY-KLEEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL PARK MAINT 44440 $8,619.65 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL JULY 4TH CELEBRATION 44441 $94.26 SARA JEN NEWBERRY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 44442 $1,188.67 SCHMIDT READY MIX INC SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT STREET MAINT 44443 $39.18 SEATING & ATHLETIC FACILITY EN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44444 $242.85 SHIELY COMPANY GRAVEL STORM DRAINAGE 44445 $554.50 SIGN-tific OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RESERVE 44446 $928.30 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44447 $484.35 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44448 $153.71 SNYDER DRUG OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 44449 $116.10 SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMM USA INC LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD 44450 $6,000.00 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI CONTINGENCY RESERVE 44451 $92.25 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 44452 $1,968.55 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING ADVERTISING COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 44453 $75.49 SPS COMPANIES BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44454 $5,138.57 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD 44455 $3,553.97 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44458 $185.00 STAIRMASTER SPORTS/MEDICAL PRO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FITNESS CENTER 44459 $24.82 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 44460 $96.20 STAR TRIBUNE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 44461 $397.31 STREICHERS SOFTBODY ARMOR POLICE 44462 $222.82 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44463 $11.85 SUPERIOR STITCH CLOTHING & UNIFORMS WATER UTILITY-GEN 0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, JUL 30, 1996, 1:18 PM CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 44464 $267.30 TAB PRODUCTS CO OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 44465 $17.00 TANA DIETZLER MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44466 $88.30 TARGET OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OAK POINT SPECIAL EVENTS 44467 $9.00 TERESA MCCOY MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44468 $1,142.56 TERRA INTERNATIONAL INC MEETING EXPENSES IN SERVICE TRAINING 44469 $63.79 THE COLOR CENTER BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER WELL #9 44470 $153.36 THE DALE GREEN COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 44471 $1,068.67 THE PROMOTION GROUP SAFETY SUPPLIES SAFETY 44472 $303.12 THE STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44473 $412.61 THE W GORDAN SMITH COMPANY MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44474 $7,559.33 THE WORK CONNECTION OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINT 44475 $2,231.18 THERMA-STOR PRODUCTS OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44476 $304.00 TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 44477 $4,575.00 TKDA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44478 $380.40 TNEMEC COMPANY INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44479 $282.90 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINT 44480 $35.45 TOTAL REGISTER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 44481 $41.17 TRIARCO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ARTS CAMP 44482 $5,681.78 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO AUTOS P/R REVOLVING FD 44483 $363.91 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA CITY CENTER GROUNDS MNTC SENIOR CENTER 44484 $200.00 TWIN CITY AREA LABOR MGMT COUN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 44485 $139.52 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 44486 $187.79 UNIFORMS UNILIMITED NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44487 $29.87 UNITED PROPERTIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 44488 $678.65 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINT 44489 $113.96 USAQUATICS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 44490 $589.00 VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44491 $596.59 VESSCO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44492 $366.66 VOSS LIGHTING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 44493 $500.55 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44494 $512.33 W W GRAINGER INC PATCHING ASPHALT EPCC MAINTENANCE 44495 $106.75 WARNING LIGHTS OF MINNESOTA EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 44496 $105.81 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 44497 $310.12 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 44498 $8,428.10 WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 44500 $150.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 44501 $164.50 WENZEL HEATING & AIR CONDITION CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 44502 $77.96 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINT 44503 $378.57 WESTWELD SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINT 44504 $14,809.01 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VALLEY VIEW & CO RD 4 44505 $846.00 WILBUR W SCHULTZ OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 44506 $101.07 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC PATCHING ASPHALT STREET MAINT 44507 $3,207.65 WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE,INC. OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES RECYCLE REBATE 44508 $641.38 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES SPECIAL EVENTS $1,698,224.58* 1y CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: Ordinances & Resolutions DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Amendment to City ITEM NO. Inspections Code Chapter 9 by adding Section 9.72 fl Emergency Securing of Buildings Y1L- Background: The Legislature Has Amended The Law Relating to The Securing of Vacant, Unoccupied or Hazardous Buildings. The New Section Authorizes The City to Provide by Ordinance For The Emergency Securing of a Building That Presents an Immediate Danger to The Health And Safety of Persons in The Community. ACTION: Approve the 1st Reading of an Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 9 by Adding Section 9.72 Emergency Securing of Buildings. 0 6128290713 LANG PAULY GREGERSON F-191 T-566 P-001/001 JUL 29 '96 14:45 A � 4440 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. -96 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 9 BY ADDING SECTION 9 .72 THERETO RELATING TO THE EMERGENCY SECURING OF BUILDINGS, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 9 .99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Chapter 9 is amended by adding Section 9 .72 thereto as follows : "Section 9.72 EMERGENCY SECURING OF BUILDINGS. Subd. 1. 'Secure' may include, but is not limited to, installing locks, repairing windows and doors, boarding windows and doors, posting 'no-trespassing' signs, installing exterior lighting or motion-detecting lights, fencing' the property, installing a monitored alarm or other security system. Subd. 2. Upon a determination by the City's building official that a building presents an immediate danger to the health and safety of persons in the City such that the emergency securing of the building is appropriate to eliminate or reduce the immediate danger the City may secure the building as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 1994, Section 463.251, Subd. 4 and this Section. " • Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 9 . 99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the _ day of , 1996, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1996. City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of 1996. C:\wp51\tap\ep\ord\emergency EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 6, 1996 SECTION: REPORTS OF OFFICERS/ CITY MANAGER ITEM NO.A$I DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Admin- Carl Jullie Finance-John Frane 1995 Financial Reports Don Uram Requested Council Action: • Staff recommends that the City Council accept the 1995 Financial Reports. Background: Minnesota Statutes require that by June 30 of each year, the City prepare a financial report for activities of the previous year. This accounting report was forwarded to the State by the deadline. Preparation of the report is largely the work of the Finance Department. The report is prepared with review by the independent auditing firm of Eide Helmeke PLLP. A representative of the auditing firm will make a presentation of the significant findings from compilation of the financial report. In general,the City's financial conditions and practices are sound. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: August 6, 1996 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Human Res., Comm.Info. & Services - T. Kucera Update on Telecommunications 3 Police - G. Therkelsen Committee Requested Action: Request the City Council to direct staff to draft a Zoning Ordinance for construction of wireless telecommunications. Background: At the request of the City Council, a committee comprised of two City Council representatives, the City Attorney, City Manager and City staff met to plan for wireless telecommunication technology and the location of the distribution devices that accompany these technologies. The committee agreed that the most important item right now is to draft a zoning ordinance and have it approved by the Council as to where wireless communications providers can locate their distribution equipment. The committee will continue to meet monthly or as needed to identify processes for telecommunication issues such as: D the jurisdiction of right-of-ways; D a possible temporary moratorium on tower construction, and an inventory of possible sites for wireless telecommunications distribution systems. Iv.council\agenda a-pcs896.wpd\bmm r EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: n SECTION: Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilties ITEM NOA -.L-1 DEPARTMENT: Parks, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Request from Doug and Susan Heyvaert Recreation and Facilities Robert A. Lambert / , Attached to this memorandum is a May 22, 1996 letter from Doug and Susan Heyvaert requesting whether or not the City is interested in meeting with them to discuss a donation to the City to build an outdoor equestrian arena in Riley Lake Park. This issue was reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission at their June 17 and July 15 meetings, and by the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their June 17 and July 15 meetings. Also, attached to this memorandum is a June 10 memorandum from the Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities providing additional background information and questions that should be reviewed prior to making a decision on this request. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: The Heritage Preservation Commission recommended approval on a unanimous vote to allow an outdoor riding arena as a use on the Riley/Jacques historic site located within Riley Lake Community Park. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission continued the item from their June 17 meeting to the July 15 meeting in order to allow all Commission members to visit the site prior to making a recommendation. At the July 15 meeting Hilgeman made the following motion: MOTION: Recommendation to direct City staff to relocate the existing outdoor riding arena from the Spring Road location to the Riley/Jacques homestead site within Riley Lake Park in 1997. The City to assume the cost for grading the site,purchasing and placing the sand base for the arena and relocating the fence around the arena. City staff to meet with the Eden Prairie Horsemen Club to develop an agreement whereby the Horsemen will be responsible for ongoing maintenance for the arena. The estimated materials cost is $3,000. Motion was seconded by Wilson. DISCUSSION: Commissioner Brown and Koenig expressed concern about dedicating a significant portion of the historic site to such a small special interest group and had concerns for the liability the City would assume by allowing horses in a park. Brown expressed a concern that young people that are visiting the park for other purposes would wander over to the riding arena and walk up to horses that may be tied to trailers and unattended. Horses can spook very easily and could step on or kick a person that is not aware of how to approach a horse. Other Commission members indicated that although the number of people who own horses is relatively small within the community, a lot of people in the community would enjoy watching horse shows or people using the riding arena for exercising horses, etc. It is important to keep a wide variety of activities available within the park system even though a relatively small number of people may participate in those activities. 1 • The motion failed on a 3-3 vote. Commissioners Brown, Koening and Kracum voting no, Hilgeman, Jacobson, and Wilson voting in favor. All of the Commission members agreed that the City should not accept the Heyvaerts offer to pay for relocating the riding arena. If the arena is relocated to the Riley/Jacques site, the City should pay for the arena and not give the Heyvaerts any special rights or access to the facility. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Lambert noted that the City was unable to keep people on horseback on the equestrian trail within Staring Lake Park and he has the same concern on the ability to keep people on horseback within the designated areas for horses within Riley Lake Park. If people on horseback begin to ride across balifields,through the swimming area,on a bicycle trail, etc.within Riley Lake Park he will recommend eliminating the riding arena from that community park. Staff recommends the City Council consider relocating the riding arena from the Spring Road site to the Riley Lake site during the summer of 1997. Staff concurs with commissioners from the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resource Commission that the City is accepting a liability risk by allowing a riding arena within a park;however,the City accepts many liability risks by allowing activities such as the Staring Lake sliding hill, an archery range,baseball fields,hockey rinks, swimming beaches, etc. within City parks. It is important to provide a wide variety of activities within the park system as long as those activities are relatively safe and do not infringe on other park uses or cause damage to the park system. The Eden Prairie Horsemen have been a very good organization to work with and have lived up to all of their commitments for maintenance of the existing riding arena. Due to the small number of people that would utilize the facility, staff believes it is appropriate to ask the Eden Prairie Horsemen to continue with their commitment for regular maintenance of the riding arena. Staff would recommend an agreement with the Horsemen similar to the agreement the City has with the operation of the riding arena at the Spring Road location. BL:mdd Arena memo 2 1?raposad 'i 1 \ e Vaina Ar i `�`�� i / V I I'I 11 / 1,1 )11 1 ' 1 \ \ / . 1 1,1 • ke \ , I I \\ i q . lig 1 0..,%0 ° \ o o q \ C m ' C I ' co— \ 10 k p \ °° iE 1 I \ I \ , , \ e Al \ 1 1 I 1 ',,\\.\\ 11:MhI d J110 '(0, gi, \ 1 L Illir , , O O I��Id T O ------) O O 2° ° i 1 12 O� / o O %j o i o co \\\\\ \�GO4;',' o ° .Z' / / /\/ • o / /, - o 0000 /j/j I ////' j. I /S , %/, / /\i o 7 .. . . ,' ,F o 1 /, /O /r e le 1 Lin abq y b4a... / 0000 ° /, r j te K...... 1 I , ° . ,,, /, i i 00, , , II ° 1I1 ' \ , r MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Heritage Preservation Commission FROM: Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities44.— DATE: June 10, 1996 SUBJECT: May 22 Letter from Doug and Susan Heyvaert Regarding Outdoor Riding Arena Attached to this memorandum is a May 22 letter from Doug and Susan Heyvaert requesting whether or not the City is interested in meeting with them to discuss a donation to the City to build an outdoor equestrian arena in Riley Lake Park. This issue is scheduled to be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission at their June 17 meeting and by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission at their June 17 meeting. BACKGROUND: The City leases approximately five acres of property from the Metropolitan Airports Commission adjacent to Spring Road for the purpose of providing an outdoor riding arena. The Eden Prairie Horsemen, a local horse owner's club, requested the City to provide this recreation facility several years ago. The City leased the property from the Metropolitan Airports Commission and graded the site and installed a gravel parking lot. Members of the riding club actually constructed the riding arena. It was understood by the City that this would be a temporary use of this property until the airport completed its master plan and determined whether or not there would be any airport expansion and what the final land uses would be around the airport. The airport expansion has been approved by the Metropolitan Council and final approval of the proposed runway extension and other expansion at the airport is temporarily delayed pending an EIS on this project. The City still anticipates this riding arena will have to be moved within the next few years. Although, there is no commitment to relocate the riding arena within the park system, the staff did evaluate alternative • locations for a riding arena several years ago. One of those alternatives was the site immediately north of the Riley/Jacques homestead buildings within Riley Lake Community Park. A riding arena has been depicted on the concept plan in order to ensure maintaining a large level site to possibly accommodate a riding arena in the future. A riding arena is only one of several uses that could be made of that part of the site; however,the final land use will be determined by the City Council after recommendations from the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: The letter from Mr. and Mrs. Heyvaert does raise some questions that should be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission: 4 1. Would the riding arena be a compatible use with the planned heritage preservation program? 2. Would the riding arena be a compatible use within the community park? 3. If a riding arena was developed at that location could horses be confined to the parking lot and that riding arena, or would there be problems with people riding horses throughout the park? (The City had to close the equestrian trail around Staring Lake because people riding horses would not stay on the designated trail.) 4. If the riding arena is approved but later the City determines that horses are causing damage to the remaining part of the park and determines to eliminate the arena, what would the commitment be to the Heyvaerts? 5. How long a commitment would the Heyvaerts need to have in order to donate funds for construction of an outdoor riding arena? 6. What other commitments would the Heyvaerts be requesting regarding access to the facility, maintenance of the facility, etc. for this donation? 7. Is there a large enough parking lot to accommodate horse trailers, etc. necessary for a horse show or other planned activities with a riding arena'? 8. The City currently provides little or no maintenance to the riding arena. With it located within a community park, adjacent to the historic site, would there be additional maintenance requirements and expectations? 9. The number of people that own horses within the community will continue to be reduced as the City is developed. Are there a sufficient number of horse owners now or in the future to make a long-term commitment for a riding arena within Riley Lake Community Park? City staff have provided a copy of this memorandum to the Heyvaerts, the Heritage Preservation Commission, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Eden Prairie Horsemen Club, and request a recommendation from the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission before forwarding it to the City Council for their consideration of this request. BL:mdd Arena/Bob96 • Bob Lambert May 22, 1996 Director, Parks, Recreation and Facilities City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Lambert, My husband, Doug, and I are currently evaluating the option to build a 4-stall barn and outdoor arena on our property at 9002 Riley Lake Road. We are looking to build by fall of this year for a May 1, 1997 occupation. Since there is very little level ground on which to build an arena, we are limited to one particular site which has many sugar maple trees. Obviously, to make the arena, many trees will have to be removed. From past Lake Riley Association meetings, we have seen where a horse arena has been penciled in on the plans for Lake Riley Park, near the historic home and barn. This location is only a block from our entrance off of Riley Lake Road. It dawned on us that we might spend a large sum of money on our arena only to have the City build one down the road in a few years. We would like to know if the Historic Preservation Commission and the Park Commission would be interested in meeting with us to discuss a large sum donation to build the arena by the end of this year (for use in spring of 1997). We assume that the Spring Lake Road arena will have to moved in the near future due to possible airport expansions and various other plans for that area. This would be a low cost option for the City of Eden Prairie to do what will probably have to be done down the road anyway. The site is already fairly level and would require little earth moving. The primary work would be in hauling in the proper mix for footing and putting up a railing. Many activities could be held there which would compliment the historic home and barn such as horse shows, roping demonstrations, clinics on equine related subjects, etc.. We would prefer spending our money on an arena in the park versus cutting our trees down to make room for one here, at our home. Please give us a call as soon as possible to let us know if we can talk about this option. We are currently waiting on our quotations to return from a couple builders. When these come back, we will have a better idea of the monies involved. Best regards, Doug and Susan Heyvaert cc: Historic Preservation Commission Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 of July 11, 1996. That the developer is interested in looking at preserving some trees, if possible, with the noted comment that the developer has indicated that they would attempt to preserve as many trees as possible during the development of the site. The Commission is approving this on the "good faith" effort noted by the speaker. Motion carried 6-0. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Request from Doug and Susan Heyyaert Regarding Outdoor Riding Arena. Staff referred the Commission to memos dated July 9, 1996, and May 22, 1996,from Robert A. Lambert,Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities; and a letter dated May 22, 1996, from Doug and Susan Heyvaert. Doug Heyvaert, 9002 Riley Lake Road, indicated they were at a horse show on Sunday. They showed a video tape of the show depicting what the arena looks like, how people park around the arena, what the ground looks like, etc. Hilgeman asked what the cost would be for the existing arena to be moved to the Riley Creek property. Lambert replied it would be man hours unless they have to replace some of the material. Heyvaert noted he received a quote of$1,500 for grading that has to be done. He estimates $3,000 for material. Koenig asked if the sand would be a one time thing. Heyvaert replied every couple of years you may need to bring another truck load in and it would cost about$200 to $300 each time. Hilgeman asked what the vote was from the Heritage Preservation Committee. Heyvaert noted they ultimately voted to approve on the land use for a riding arena. Brown expressed concern about the horses being tied up to the trailer with no one around. He was concerned about children and adults coming up to pet them and getting hurt. He was very concerned about having a horse arena in a public park. He supports the riding arena but would like an alternative plan for the horses when they are tied up like corralling them together. Heyvaert noted that Minnetonka has never had a problem and they have 12 shows a year. Hilgeman suggested giving it a chance and see what happens. 3 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 Wilson commented that these horses are not wild. Even if it's their first show, they have had significant training. Lambert commented there would be many more problems if the horses were tied together because they are more likely to kick other horses than they are people. They would be taking a chance just like they do with baseball games in the park and playground equipment. The Horsemen's Club is the only group required to have insurance. They are insured and have named the City as an additional insured which helps with the City's liability. Koenig was concerned because this is a very narrow segment of the population that will use this. There are many other things the City can do in the park. She was also concerned about the safety issues of having a riding arena in a city park. Heyvaert noted that this location has electricity and hot water which is why this site is better. He commented that many people will enjoy just watching the shows. They don't have to participate just like when you go to a baseball game. They will watch and enjoy the show without participating. Hilgeman commented she was not comfortable accepting this donation from the Heyvaerts even though it was very generous of them to offer. It would be better for the city to use the volunteer man hours and relocate the existing boards, and have the Horsemen's Club pay for the upkeep for grading of the site, painting of the fencing and whatever else is included in the upkeep. They need a written agreement of who takes care of what. Lambert suggested that the Horsemen's Club meet with the City Staff and come up with a plan that's acceptable to them. Koenig commented that keeping the horses within the arena and not having them out on the trails is an issue that needs to be taken very seriously. Lambert indicated that horses are not allowed in City parks or on City trails unless it's a designated area. Staff will have to get signage up saying no horses on the trails or on parkland. He noted he will go to the City Council to eliminate the arena if they have horse users that can't follow the rules. Hilgeman suggested a donation from the Horsemen's Club. Lambert noted that they have given substantial donations in the past whenever asked. Hilgeman asked for a time frame from the City when this could be done. Lambert said tentatively for the Summer of 1997. Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Monday, July 15, 1996 MOTION: Jacobson moved, seconded by Wilson, to establish a riding arena at Riley Lake Park and this will be carried out by moving the existing arena sometime in the Summer of 1997, and the City is paying for the grading,the sand, and moving it, and the Horsemen's Club and Staff should meet to discuss a plan for the upkeep of the future new riding arena. Motion tied 3-3 with nay votes by Brown, Koenig, and Kracum. Brown, Koening and Kracum were concerned about liability and the small number of people the facility would actually serve. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Recommendation for Policy on Chargingfor Electricity Use in Parks. Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated June 25, 1996, from Robert A. Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation and Facilities. Lambert indicated that over the years the City has never charged for electricity in the park. They now have more and more people plugging in for electricity. The only users they have allowed in the park were public service groups or Eden Prairie businesses or citizens. There is not a consistent policy for charging for electrical use and the question is just now being raised regarding whether or not associations should be charged extra for tournaments that require the use of lights. Staffs recommendation was for $10 per day for 15-amp service charge as well as a charge of an additional $25 per day per field for those fields that require lighting as a part of the tournament. This is strictly for the tournaments they are doing as fund raisers. This is a minimal fee compared to other communities listed in the memo. Staff believes this will cover the City's cost because they are not looking to make money. Notices were sent out to the presidents of the various athletic teams. The response from Dick Berg, president of the Baseball Association, was they have no problem paying a reasonable fee for the use of electricity. Jacobson commented that the Boy Scouts are at the park for only two hours during a concert and$5 an hour is too high. Lambert replied that generally people use it for three to four hours or longer so it's reasonable. Discussion ensued regarding what a fair rate would be to charge the groups. Hilgeman asked if$5 an hour would way more than cover the City's cost. Lambert replied it would. 1 Dear Mayor Harris, and Council members Ron Case, Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Patricia Pidcock, and Ross Thorfinnson, I would like to express my support for the proposed outdoor horse riding arena at Riley Lake Park. As the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously agrees, I feel the draw of horse activities to the arena will provide diversity to the park system, enable children and adults to enjoy horses in various activities, and will complement the Historic Preservation's intent to utilize that land in a manner consistent with a historic site, namely the Riley- Jacques Homestead. Additional personal comments: k& s c /� = o/Ct rLuroL hod s . bte- a A_e_, .,-c) ±4,Qii✓cam � _ -- pry /z . 6k . ��2 7(j. -� - a / use__ r l __A//1. _ . Respectively, Name: J --tea C SaX,_ (Q _ 1 Address: J . 123 ocQ .e- CD( C Q_ 53`-Co Dear Mayor Harris, and Council members Ron Case, Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Patricia Pidcock, and Ross Thorfinnson, I would like to express my support for the proposed outdoor horse riding arena at Riley Lake Park. As the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously agrees, I feel the draw of horse activities to the arena will provide diversity to the park system, enable children and adults to enjoy horses in various activities, and will complement the Historic Preservation's intent to utilize that land in a manner consistent with a historic site, namely the Riley- Jacques Homestead. Additional personal comments: _1(g. A-Zeilf-e4`7zAgdZ-adfri-L-d -fr-7/20 5/16114.a .it-11_zs-61/ 64 -2"i2ilded -eA-J._ ‘oexe4,444..A &--2c1 (46,e/t_ __LLA-s2221.e_ " 74,1,ixe ,p/4".6, je, ezli- Respectively, Name: Address: A Dear Mayor Harris, and Council members Ron Case, Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Patricia Pidcock, and Ross Thorfinnson, I would like to express my support for the proposed outdoor horse riding arena at Riley Lake Park. As the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously agrees, I feel the draw of horse activities to the arena will provide diversity to the park system, enable children and adults to enjoy horses in various activities, and will complement the Historic Preservation's intent to utilize that land in a manner consistent with a historic site, namely the Riley- Jacques Homestead. Additional personal comments: Respectively, Name: N1 4✓\mn (s c, lc; Address: _ . `lZ> `' a ��« _ (G im t 5 s 1/ Dear Mayor Harris, and Council members Ron Case, Nancy Tyra-Lukens, Patricia Pidcock, and Ross Thorfinnson, I would like to express my support for the proposed outdoor horse riding arena at Riley Lake Park. As the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously agrees, I feel the draw of horse activities to the arena will provide diversity to the park system, enable children and adults to enjoy horses in various activities, and will complement the Historic Preservation's intent to utilize that land in a manner consistent with a historic site, namely the Riley- Jacques Homestead. Additional personal comments: / G 9 --r SSG'47_ Ziz( — V /64;2-701- e ivel , P Y. Name: ___ _ Address: �V 73a2 .s i1/