Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 09/16/1997 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1997 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES A. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING HELD MONDAY. AUGUST 11. 1997 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING HEARING DATE C. RELEASE OF LAND FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT FOR THOMAS AND REBECCA DORR. I.C. 95-03 D. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING "NO PARKING" FOR CSAH 4 FROM CSAH 1 TO TERREY PINE DRIVE, I.C. 52-153 City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Page Two E. APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR ADVANCE ENCUMBERMENT OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS F. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT TH212 AND FOUNTAIN PLACE INTERSECTION. I.C. 96-5398 G. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT TH212 AND FOUNTAIN PLACE, I.C. 96-5398 H. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MOUNT PLAT TWO I. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MOUNT PLAT THREE J. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR BEARPATH 6TH ADDITION K. 2ND READING OF ORDINANCES APPROVING HERITAGE SITE DESIGNATIONS FOR THE CUMMINS-PHIPPS-GRILL HOMESTEAD. LOOKOUT PARK WAYSIDE, PURGATORY CREEK BRIDGE (CREEK KNOLL ROAD). RILEY-JACQUES FARM, FREDRICK-MILLER SPRING AND SMITH-DOUGLAS- MORE HOUSE L. APPROVAL OF LIQUOR STORE - CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 M. APPROVAL OF LIQUOR STORE - CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 N. MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING aka LAKEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING AT SOUTHWEST CROSSING by Valley View L.L.C. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.57 acres and Rezoning from C-Reg to Office on 1.57 acres, Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.57 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Mountview Office Building by Valley View L.L.C. Location: Valley View Road and Prairie Center Drive (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution for Site Plan Review) City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Page Three O. PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING by Prairieview L.L.C. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 10.88 acres and Rezoning from Rural to Office on 10.88 acres, Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 10.88 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Prairieview Office Building by Prairieview L.L.C. Location: 7800 Equitable Drive (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution for Site Plan Review) P. CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM Adopt a Resolution electing to continue participation in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program (LHIA) under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. (Resolution) Q. SET CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR TUESDAY. OCTOBER 7. 1997. 6:30 PM, TO DISCUSS EMERGENCY OPERATING PLAN R. APPROVE PERMIT FOR WATERMAIN CROSSING TWIN CITIES AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY. I.C. 5440 S. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION, I.C. 94-5350 T. 1ST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSING. SECTIONS 5.30. 5.33, 5.34, 5.41, 5.42, AND 5.43 AND REPEALING SECTION 5.33. SUBD. 3.A. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. PRAIRIE LAKES CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 2 by United Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 13.07 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 13.07 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 13.07 acres and Site Plan Review on 13.07 acres. Location: Prairie Lakes Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review) B. GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES by Northco. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 60.29 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 60.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 60.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 60.29 acres and Preliminary Plat on 42.31 acres. Location: West 78th Street. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Page Four C. THE PINES - JULY 1997 by Lunski Construction and Design. Request for PUD Concept Review on 5.81 acres, PUD District Review on 5.81 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.81 acres and Preliminary Plat on 5.81 acres into 14 single family lots and one outlot. Location: County Road 18 Frontage Road and Bluff Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) D. WASHBURN McCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL by Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.51 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.51 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 7.51 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.51 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.51 acres. Location: East on Mitchell Road, east of Martin Drive. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS Xl. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. CITY AND SCHOOL FACILITY USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE CITY FACILITY USE POLICIES FOR USE BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT City Council Agenda Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Page Five D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT TliejITZ:6 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 272 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOLS OFFICIAL MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 11, 1997 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING A joint Eden Prairie City Council/Eden Prairie School Board meeting was held on the 11th day of August, 1997 at 7:05 p.m. in the Administrative Services Center board room at 8100 School Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. OPENING BUSINESS A. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Karen Norman, board chair. Superintendent Gaslin and the following board members were present: Karen Norman, Mary Endorf, Ann Yonamine, Carol Bomben, Mark Kantor, Barbara Gabbert, and David Hann. The following City Council members were present: Mayor Jean Harris, Ronald Case, Sherry Butcher-Younghans and Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. The following City Council staff members were present: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources, and Eugene Dietz, Director of Public Works. School District staff in attendance were: Cyndie Hays, High School Principal, Steve Schultz, High School Activities Director, and Roxanne Aase, Acting Recording Secretary. II. SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDUM PRESENTATION Superintendent Gaslin introduced a presentation on the September 9 special election and reviewed the history of the past referendum and what has transpired since then. Also presenting were Cyndie Hays, Eden Prairie High School's principal, Steve Schultz, high school activities director, Karl Beach, director of technology and Woody Franklin, facilities/safety director. Outlined in the presentation were the specifics of the September 9 referendum which includes two questions: 1) high school modifications, activity center addition and site improvements, and 2) technology and air quality. Mayor Harris said the district made its case in the presentation, but asked how we will simplify the information and get it to the general public. Bill Gaslin talked about the referendum committee with many members reaching out into the community as well as the printed materials that are available. He also discussed how the referendum committee will be covering key events during the "back-to- school" events such as open houses, PAC meetings, kick-off meetings, etc. He also commented on how accurately the Eden Prairie News has presented the referendum information. Mayor Harris asked what the key messages are to be conveyed. The cost savings from our decision to stay with one high school and the configuration of the rest of the district is a big one. Air quality is a key, as is the availability of space and the declining tax rate. She also asked what happens if it is voted down and the disabled needs are not met. Sherry Butcher-Younghans also asked if there were grants to accomplish the disability portion. It was explained that all grant monies have been I Official Minutes of the August 11, 1997 Joint City Council/School Board Meeting 2 used, and that the Administrative Services Center is "grandfathered" in at this point; however, if any major changes were to be made, this would have to be the first. Have we examined what the taxpayers' mood is? What are the major questions, and are we ready to answer them? It always gets down to the bottom line -- what is this going to cost? David Hann responded with the declining tax rate information, and that this is very important to convey to the voters. Bob Lambert spoke to the need for a domed turf area and talked about how this would help meet the needs of many groups. He said he hoped the referendum passes, and that it's only a matter of time before we have one. Carl 7ullie commented the continuing need for technology and possible cost savings if it could be shared. Mayor Harris stated that the technology piece could be a good selling point about preparing our youth for our growing and changing world -- which ties right in to the Eden Prairie Schools' mission statement. She stressed the need for some students to graduate with a technical skill and be prepared for school-to-work. The Docutech technology training would be a means of accomplishing that. Chris Enger talked about the recurring need for technology improvements/updates. Will we be coming back for more funds to offset those needs? David Hann responded that the hope is to build a resource in the district that could potentially generate income, and this could offset future expenditures. The question was asked how our two questions were formulated. Why was air quality listed with technology? Ann Yonamine stated that air quality is a new technology. The board discussed how the questions came to be and how strategy was employed to try to ensure that everything passes. All are needed items -- if they don't pass now, they will still need to done in the near future. Various members of the City Council expressed support for the referendum and asked what could they could do. Sherry Butcher-Younghans asked for question and answer/fact sheets and stated they are grateful to have the information as they field a lot of questions from the community. Chris Enger stated that their tax people should get together with ours so they can understand the tax picture in the same way. III. MUTUAL INTEREST AREAS Topics for future discussion include using our networks to provide information. Mayor Harris would like to discuss asset building in the community. IV. ADJOURNMENT Karen Norman, Dr. Gaslin, and board members expressed their gratitude to the City Council members for giving their time, for their support and for sharing their ideas with the district. The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully Recorded by Roxanne Aase, Acting Secretary Eden Prairie School Board 2 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Barbara Anderson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Tyra-Lukens requested the addition of an article published in the Hennepin County newsletter under Councilmember Reports. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. II. OPEN PODIUM Molly Dunning, 10112 Bluff Road, stated she sent a letter to Rod Rue regarding the traffic situation at the buss stop and their request for a stop sign, but has not had a response from him. Mayor Harris commented this was the first step in the process and requested that Ms. Dunning give the City some time to resolve this problem. Jullie concurred, and stated he believed they could have this situation analyzed and determine the most appropriate course of action to be taken within 30 days. Mayor Harris noted that there were many ways of controlling traffic other than stop signs but the City Council was receptive to any resolution which would protect the children. III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 19. 1997 Mayor Harris noted that Amanda Skinner's last name should be added to the Open Podium section of the Minutes. { CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 2 MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, Case seconded to approve the Minutes of the August 19, 1997 City Council meeting as amended. Motion carried 5-0. B. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD THURSDAY. AUGUST 21, 1997 Mayor Harris noted that the first paragraph on Page two needed to be reworked by staff as it was unclear, and on page 3, in the first full paragraph, she wanted to change it to read, " She stated she was most impressed by the efficiency with which a process was moving along from year to year and this year was the best of all." MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve the Minutes of the Special City Council meeting held Thursday, August 21, 1997 as amended. Motion carried 5-0. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR PARKS/PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING C. RESOLUTION NO. 97-161 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDER ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS FOR BIRCH ISLAND WATERMAIN, I.C. 97-5440 MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve Items A- C on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. BEST BUY CAMPUS CONCEPT PLAN - 1997 by Best Buy. Request for Planned Unit Development District Review on 3.5 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 3.5 acres, Site Plan Review on 3.5 acres and Preliminary Plat of 47.45 acres into 1 lot and road right-of-way. Location: 7575 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution No. 97-162 for Preliminary Plat) David Clark, Architect, reviewed the plans for the Best Buy Concept Plan, and noted they have added 600 employees since 1994 and thus far have expanded within the existing building. He described the site and the possible areas for expansion. He discussed the areas which will be used to satisfy the parking requirements, and noted they will not impact any wetlands with the installation of this parking. He discussed the drainage and ponding on the site and the existing wetland, noting it is isolated and the development around this wetland is CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 3 continuous. The future development will be along the north edge of the property, which is the only area where the building could be located because of existing soil conditions and existing wetlands. They met with the I-494 Commission to see if there were ways they could get employees to carpool but he did not know if they would be successful in this effort. Tyra-Lukens noted that traffic was becoming a large concern in this area and asked if they were doing anything with staggered shifts, etc. to facilitate decreasing the levels of traffic during peak periods. Clark responded that they have a voluntary type of staggered system but it is not a formalized schedule. Tyra-Lukens asked about the areas of the site which were not suitable for building and inquired if they would be suitable for parking ramps. Clark responded that they are looking at this but parking ramps are very expensive and difficult to justify. Butcher-Younghans noted she was also concerned about the extent of the parking area on the site and asked about underground parking to decrease some of the hard surface coverage on the site. Clark responded that they have agreed to use underground parking at least under the building. The Planning Commission requested they look at this as a possibility of reducing the parking area on the site. Butcher-Younghans asked if the ball fields could be repositioned to go behind the parking area which could be located where the ball fields are now located. Clark responded that they had talked to their people about this but they don't want to move the ball fields. If they leave the ball fields where they are presently located it would make a better plan for the site overall. Butcher-Younghans encouraged them to continue with their car pooling efforts with their employees to decrease traffic and parking on the site. Clark commented they are working towards this and are trying to get a transit stop at their door which will facilitate more employees using the transit system to get to work. Case requested clarification on where the wetlands were and Clark explained the location of the wetlands and how they would be impacted. Case asked how much of the wetland would be impacted by the alteration and Clark responded that it would impact five acres. They will replant the disturbed areas with natural grasses and vegetation so that the area will blend in with the existing areas. Tyra-Lukens asked about the 8.5' or 9' parking stall size and if they used smaller stalls if it would reduce the impact on the wetlands. Clark responded that City Staff has been reluctant to set a precedent by allowing the smaller stalls but they would be amendable to that, should staff concur. Case stated he was concerned that the water from the NURP pond was being released into the stream from the wetlands. Clark stated that they will hold the water in the wetlands until it is of such quality that it will not adversely impact 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 4 the stream, and only then will it be released from the wetland. Enger reviewed the staff report and noted the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on August 21, 1997 in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to 14 property owners within the affected area. On August 11, 1997, the Planning Commission reviewed this request and has recommended approval of the Phase 2 parking expansion. The overall PUD Concept Approval for expansion of the Best Buy campus will be further reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 8 meeting, and the City Council will be reviewing the plan on October 7. The proponent will be requesting early issuance of a grading permit for Phase 2 parking so construction can begin prior to the winter season. The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission did not review the Phase 2 portion of the project since it does not affect trees nor the wetland. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to closed the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harris noted that the Planning Commission has continued the Concept Plan in order to consider alternatives and the application for the rezoning was part of that request. Tyra-Lukens inquired how many parking stalls they would save if they used the smaller parking stall size and Enger responded that people do not see the lines for the parking stalls during the winter months and park where they feel comfortable. Staff has believed that if a smaller stall size is utilized there must be some type of year-round stall delineation such as that utilized at the Crosstown Athletic Club. Discussion ensued regarding the wetland area being impacted by the project and the importance of preserving the existing wetlands within the community. Harris stated she was interested in preserving the green space along Flying Cloud Drive which mitigates the swath of concrete and asphalt. Thorfinnson asked about the number of employees on the site presently and how many more would be there in the future. Clark responded that they have converted the site entirely to office usage, and they expect to have about 1,100 more employees on the site. Thorfinnson stated he was concerned about the traffic and the need for parking and encouraged the proponent to address this issue and promote some sort of traffic management plan by staggering shifts, encouraging car pooling and using transit which would decrease the need for that much parking on the site. Discussion ensued regarding ways the parking on the site could be reduced. Harris noted that we need to have a regional transportation plan, and at this CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 5 point can only encourage businesses to look at ways to reduce parking. The City Council needs to facilitate this goal and do all we can to assist the Community in achieving it. The Planning Commission has reserved the right to study this situation further. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to adopt 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District , Change from Rural to I-2 on 3.5 acres; adopt Resolution No. 97-162 for Preliminary Plat on 47.45 acres into 1 lot; and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. Pauley noted that the Concept Amendment was part of the Public Hearing process and the City Council should reconsider closing the Public Hearing. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to reopen the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing but continue the Concept Plan Review until the October 7, 1997 meeting. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to adopt 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District , Change from Rural to I-2 on 3.5 acres; adopt Resolution No. 97-162 for Preliminary Plat on 47.45 acres into 1 lot; and direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. B. VACATION 97-04: EASEMENTS IN SHADY OAK BUSINESS CENTER (Resolution No. 97-163) Jullie gave the staff report and noted staff recommended approval of the vacation. The official notice of this Public Hearing was published on August 14, 1997 in the Eden Prairie News. The owners have requested the City to vacate the underlying drainage and utility easements to enable unencumbered title to the newly platted lots. Replacement easements have been property dedicated on the new plat. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to Close the Public Hearing; and Adopt Resolution No. 97-163 vacating the drainage and utility easements described in Shady Oak Business Center. Motion carried 5-0. C. VACATION 97-06: RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR PART OF RIVERVIEW ROAD (Resolution No. 97-164) Jullie gave the staff report and noted staff recommended approval of the vacation. The official notice of this Public Hearing was published on August 14, CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 6 1997 in the Eden Prairie News. The owners of land parcels adjacent to Riverview Road have requested this vacation to provide consistent side yard set backs from the roadway. The vacation of the easement and right-of-way, combined with the dedication of replacement easements, will be consistent with existing platted lots located to the west. Case asked why this was not done at the time the roadway was constructed and Dietz responded that it came up after the development was done. It is an adjustment which is usually done after the development is completed. The Public Hearing was opened. No one present wished to speak. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case to close the Public Hearing, and adopt Resolution No. 97-164 vacating the right-of-way for part of Riverview Road and adjacent drainage and utility easements located in the plats of Bluff's West 2nd Addition and The Bluff at Riverview in Section 35. Motion carried 5-0. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case to approval the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a Roll Call Vote, with Butcher-Younghans, Case, Thorfinnson, Tyra-Lukens, and Harris voting "aye". VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING PROPOSED 1998 PROPERTY TAX LEVY. ACCEPTING PROPOSED 1998 BUDGET, AND SETTING DATE(S) FOR TRUTH-IN-TAXATION HEARING(S) Jullie noted that pursuant to the Council's direction at our Workshop on August 21, staff recommends that the Council adopt the Resolution which will certify the proposed 1998 net property tax levy to be $17,878,492; sets the "Truth-In- Taxation" Public Hearing for Wednesday, December 10, 1997; and, if necessary, to reconvene the Public Hearing on Wednesday, December 17, 1997; and accepts the proposed 1998 Budget of$24,675,990 as reviewed by the Council on August 21, 1997. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to adopt Resolution No. 97- 165 certifying the proposed 1998 property tax levy, accepting the proposed 1998 Budget, and setting Wednesday, December 10, 1997 and Wednesday, December 17, 1997 as the dates for the "Truth-In-Taxation" hearings. Motion carried 5- 0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 7 B. RESOLUTON CERTIFYING PROPOSED 1998 LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICES TAX LEVY AND SETTING DATE(S) FOR TRUTH-IN- TAXATION HEARING(S) Jullie stated staff recommends the Council adopt a Resolution which will Certify the proposed 1998 net local transit services tax levy to be $2,078,513; and sets the "Truth-In-Taxation" Public Hearing for Wednesday, December 10, 1997 and, if necessary, to reconvene the Public Hearing on Wednesday, December 17, 1997. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case to adopt Resolution No. 97-166 certifying the proposed 1998 Local Transit Services Tax Levy and setting the dates for the "Truth-In-Taxation" Public Hearings for Wednesday, December 10, 1997 and, if necessary, to reconvene the Public Hearing on Wednesday, December 17, 1997. Motion carried 5-0. VIII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REQUEST TO REMOVE BASKETBALL COURT FROM FRANLO PARK Lambert reviewed the details of this request and the recommendations from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission which reviewed this matter at its meeting on August 18, 1997. He has met with homeowners and the home was toured by the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission which listened from the deck and from the bedroom while someone pounded a basketball on the court. There was only one place to relocate the court but that was within the foul ball zone of the baseball field, and staff did not recommend this. The neighborhood was notified of this and there has been opposition to relocation of the court. The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission took action recommending repair of the backboard and relocating it to the north end of the court, and recommended giving the Director of Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources the authority to change the hours of operation within City parks. Butcher-Younghans asked if they could put some surface on the courts which would deaden the sound of the ball and Lambert responded he had never seen it done on an outdoor court. The Public Hearing was opened. Amanda Swenson, 10567 Lee Drive, stated she has been there playing and the backboard does not make noise anymore, so it has been fixed. If they make it a half-court playing area it won't be large enough to play on. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 8 Molly Dunning, 10112 Bluff Road, stated the sound of the basketball court was objectionable because of the noise when the windows were open, but she believed that the windows could be closed and this would alleviate the noise. She was aware that there was one individual who had caused a problem, but understood that had been resolved. Lambert stated the problem had been crea ted by someone who worked at night and was using the basketball court at 6:00 a.m. after he got off work. Lambert suggested that he use the Homeward Hills court at that time which had resolved the problem. Case stated he supported the Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources having the authority to change the hours of City Parks, and Mayor Harris concurred, and noted she had reservations about moving the court. Butcher- Younghans concurred, stating she would not like to see the park changed because of this, but she supported giving the Director of Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources the authority to change park hours. Discussion ensued regarding ways the basketball court could be screened from the adjacent property. Mayor Harris stated that when we turn children away from desirable pursuits they turn to less desirable ones, and she believed the court should be kept open. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to accept the recommendations from the Parks, Recreation& Natural Resources Commission to initiate a change in the City Code giving the Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources authority on changing hours of operations within City parks, with input and recommendation for approval from the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. Motion carried 5-0. IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION - Heritage Site Designations Jane Hession, Chair of the Heritage Preservation Commission recommended the City Council adopt the Ordinance designating the six sites as significant sites to be preserved within the City. A Finding of Significance Statement was prepared for each of these sites and Public Hearings for each site were conducted by the Heritage Preservation Commission. She stated that preservation of historic sites benefits the entire community. Jullie noted the Planning Commission also reviewed the Heritage site nominations and recommended approval. Butcher-Younghans inquired if there were any financial benefits to designating sites as being of historical significance and Hession responded that they have a much greater opportunity for securing grants for funding for restoration and preservation of these sites. Case commented we were fortunate to be designating properties that have no opposition. He asked what they would do if a prospective landowner had concerns about having their property designated as CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 9 a historical site and Hession responded that the designation process would not go forward if the property owner were opposed to it. The benefit of having historic buildings designated as historic sites was that a historic site alteration permit would need to be obtained before any major alterations could be made to any buildings so designated. Case inquired how permanent a historic site designation was and Hession responded that if a site is destroyed by fire or becomes a hazard, the designation could be removed. MOTION: Tyra-:Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson to approve the 1st Reading of the Ordinance approving Heritage Site Designations for the Cummins-Phipps-Grill Homestead, Lookout Park Wayside, Purgatory Creek Bridge (Creek Knoll Road), Riley-Jacques Farm, Fredrick-Miller Spring, and Smith-Douglas-More House. Motion carried 5-0. B. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION - Councilmember Nancy Tyra-Lukens Tyra-Lukens noted the Southwest Metro Transit Commission has approved the purchase of some used busses and heaters. Friday, September 5, 1997 will be the official ground breaking for the Transit Hub. X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS Tyra Lukens noted that in the Hennepin County newsletter there was a section on environmental health and a picture was included with the article. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. COMMUNITY CENTER POOL IMPROVEMENTS - HVAC SYSTEM AND POOL FILTRATION IMPROVEMENTS AND PROPOSED RATE INCREASES Lambert noted the Council is requested to authorize proceeding with advertising for bids for improvements to the heating and ventilation system and pool filtration system at the Community Center swimming pool. The estimated total costs are $360,000. Funding would come from Cash Park Fees and an increase in the rental fees for use of the CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 10 pool. He discussed the background for this request and the possibility of the School District to assist with these costs was discussed. The School District did not believe it was appropriate for them to fund improvements for a facility they did not own, but were willing to pay the going rate for use of the pool facility. Staff developed three different rates to promote people to use the pool during later hours. He reviewed the proposed rates and times during which these rates would be.in effect. Mark Davis, 2333 Terrace Drive, Wayzata, President of the Foxjets, stated they feel they pay a very high rate at present for use of the pool and any immediate increase in fees for pool usage would be an undue burden upon the swim club. Their cost structure would be prohibitive to their members and it would force them to look elsewhere for facilities. He requested that implementation of any increases be delayed until next June or the following fall, but he preferred that the rates remain the same. Discussion ensued regarding the costs for use of the School District pool versus the Community Center pool and it was apparent that the Community Center pool was more expensive. Case asked what the Oak Point pool rent was and Lambert responded that staff broke it down so they could rent the pool on a lane-by-lane basis and at the same rate for either facility. Case inquired if the increased fees would be applied toward operating costs rather than the costs of the new ventilation system and Lambert responded that it was the City Council's choice as to how they want to have the funds used. The Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission approved the project without using Cash Park Fees. Thorfinnson inquired where the money to pay for the improvements to the Community Center pool would come from and stated he did not support any proposal until that had been decided. Mayor Harris commented that until a motion had been made to make the improvements and go out for bids it was not relevant how the project would be paid for. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to proceed with advertising for bids for improvements to the Community Center swimming pool and adjustment to the rental fees for pool usage as per the Staff Agenda Report of September 2, 1997. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harris inquired where the funding would be obtained. Lambert responded that the Cash Park Fees were available and if the Council determined that was the best way to pay for the improvements, those JO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 11 funds could be replaced using an increase in usage fees rather than have those fees go back into the General Fund. Case inquired if we used Cash Park Fees to pay for the improvements to the Community Center Pool and those funds were not replaced, what would not be completed in the plans. Lambert responded that there were two major park buildings that need to be replaced but those could be set back two years and four years. He noted that the Cash Park Fees are a one-time revenue source which will diminish over time, and he did not believe it was a good idea to keep taking funds without replacing them. Discussion ensued regarding people paying equitably for services they receive from the City and subsidizing activities being done fairly between sports and activities. The question of how other cities handle this issue was raised, and Lambert commented that the City follows what other cities do. He noted that hockey rinks are the most expensive to maintain and outdoor field activities are the least expensive. Staff is trying to follow the direction of the City Council to meet operating expenses at the Community Center with usage fees. Butcher- Younghans supported taking Cash Park Fees for this and while she was loathe to take money earmarked for other things, it could be repaid. Increased rates would be a way to pay for some of the costs, which would be borne by the users of the facility. Tyra-Lukens commented it was hard enough to keep the facilities we have now in good shape and she supported using Cash Park Fees because things on the C.I.P. may never be realized. She noted the reason the improvements were being made was because the Foxjets use the facility, but there was a history of not raising fees for other groups. If the rates are raised it will prohibit some people from participating in the swim club, and the proposed increase would be a 63% increase which could make it necessary for the club to leave the community. This would eliminate the revenues now generated by the swim club. Thorfinnson stated we need a Capital Improvement Budget to take care of this type of problem and he felt they needed to address this issue. He did not support taking the funds from the Cash Park Fees but the money had to come from somewhere. Discussion ensued regarding where the funds could be obtained, perhaps from the General Fund. Case stated he was concerned about raising rates so high that kids cannot compete. He was not comfortable with replenishing it from higher user fees until he could see the larger picture and he assured this was equitable. Butcher- Younghans commented that there were things clubs could do to offset costs such as fundraisers. Thorfinnson inquired how the sideboards at the hockey rink were paid for and Lambert responded //that the funds were taken from the Cash Park li CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 12 Fees and then replenished. The fees were increased and the School District gave the City the revenue from the hockey games to repay this expenditure. Discussion ensued regarding ways to pay for this cost and the impact on the taxpayers if these costs were spread out over 10-12 years with no interest. It would be a significant impact on the taxpayers and on the general fund. Tyra-Lukens asked that the costs be evaluated between all the user fees and equitably spread out over all the sports in Eden Prairie. Lambert commented the School District felt it was fair to charge what the going rate was and the costs were about $80 per hour to operate the pool. They could not increase the rate to $80 per hour and the School District wants to be sure everyone is charged the same rates. The proposed increase goes from $35 per hour to $45 per hour. Lambert reviewed the changes and noted that it would be pro-rated as it has been in the past, and was about a 15% increase in fees. Davis commented that swimming was a very low participant sport and did not generate the same kind of involvement that other sports do. They do not make money and the cost per participant is very high. It takes more time for a swimmer to become competitive than it does for a person playing baseball or some other sport. It does not seem equitable that the Foxjets need to absorb such a high portion of the costs. They ask that the City Council consider this when making a decision. Thorfinnson commented that we can be equitable when it is something that has over-all City benefits, but when it was something that was specific to one particular organization, then the costs should be borne by that particular organization. Discussion ensued regarding the reasons for doing the renovation and if the City would be doing this if the team was not there. Other uses were discussed and the costs associated with those uses. It was suggested that the School District be charged for its fair share of the costs. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to pay for the improvements to the Community Center from the Cash Park Fees. Thorfinnson amended the motion to include that the Cash Park Fund be re-paid with increased revenues using a schedule to be determined. Thorfinnson noted he wanted to replenish the funds over an undetermined amount of time from some source. Motion on the amendment carried 5-0. Motion as amended carried 5-0. Lambert requested clarification of the direction regarding the options and Mayor Harris noted that Thorfinnson indicated the Foxjets were only one of multiple users and there were others that used the pool. Case CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 2, 1997 Page 13 requested staff review percentages that the City subsidizes other sports, and also operation and maintenance costs. Butcher-Younghans requested staff to look at clubs that do participate in the maintenance of their facilities. Case stated he would be supportive of not increasing the rates for the Foxjets until next June. D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. 13 OPCITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: -er� SECTION: Consent Calendar 9-16-97 re DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Gretchen Laven Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR(MULTI-FAMILY& COMM.) Bor-Son Building Corporation Centimark Corporation E C I Building Contractors Jensen/Tom KA Construction& Tile Inc LL Dysart Construction Inc Metro Karate Redstone Construction Company Inc Rosemount Inc Rosenquist Construction Inc PLUMBING C & M Plumbing Heating&Air Conditioning Totally Plumbing Inc UTILITY INSTALLER Pete's Water& Sewer Inc CIGARETTE Meg Manufacturing Inc/dba Garden Court Gift Shop Premium Tobacco PRIVATE KENNEL Markham/Ronald&Jana September 16, 1997 1 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: T 8 SECTION: Consent Calendar Tv DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Special Jim Richardson Assessment Rolls and Setting Hearing Date Recommended Action: Approve resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of special assessment hearing rolls and setting hearing date. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF 1997 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND SETTING HEARING DATE WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the following listed improvements and the total project cost, including expenses incurred, or to be incurred and the City's share, exclusive of that assignable to City Property, are established as shown on the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. The cost of such improvements to be specially assessed are hereby declared to be those as set forth in Exhibit A. 2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for each improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the office of the Deputy Clerk for public inspection. 3. A hearing shall be held on the 21st day of October, 1997 in the Eden Prairie City Center, 8080 Mitchell Road, at 7:30 p.m., to pass upon such proposed assessments and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessments. 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of the record of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2. EXHIBIT A 1997 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS September 16, 1997 PROJECTS Total Cost City Funds Amt to be Assessed I.C. 94-5363 Street&Utility Improvements on Sunnybrook Road 461,860.00 I.C. 96-5422 Special Assessment Agreement on retaining wall 14298 Golf View Dr 3,500.00 I.C. 96-5404 Signalization&Widening of Eden Prairie Road at High School Entr. 600,000.00 Supplementals Trunk Sewer and Water 485,845.00 I.C. 52-088 Trunk Exclusions -MRS Trunk 520.00 I.C. 52-203 Trunk Exclusions -Staring Lane/Ridge Road 520.00 I.C. 94-5360 Trunk Exclusions - Golden Ridge Drive 520.00 I.C. 52-212 Lateral Exclusions - Cedar Ridge/Corral Lane 7,073.41 I.C. 94-5360 Lateral Exclusions - Golden Ridge Drive 3,088.00 SAC/WAC 2,660.00 I.C. 52-067 Deferral Assessments/Rowland Road 3,400.00 I.C. 52-132 Deferral Assessments/Franlo Road 58,035.10 Tax Forfeiture 40,343.24 Connection Fees 113,685.29 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: LV SECTION: Consent Calendar �-V DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: S.S.A. 95-03 Engineering Division Release of Land from Special Assessment Agreement Jim Richardson Recommended Action: Approve Release of Land from Special Assessment Agreement 95-03 (Thomas and Rebecca Dorr) resulting from the property owners completing the work as outlined in said agreement. Background: This agreement was for the construction of a five-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Lot 1, Block 1, Stenehjem Addition to link two previously constructed segments together. RELEASE OF LAND This Release of Land is executed by the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and is dated as of September 16, 1997. FACTS 1. A certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments("Agreement")dated October 25, 1995, was executed by and between the City, and Thomas and Rebecca Dorr, husband and wife, which Agreement was filed as Document No. 2658009 with the Registrar of Titles on December 1, 1995. The Agreement related to the property described therein as: Lot 1, Block 1, Stenehjem Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. The improvements as stated in the Agreement have been completed by the Owners. 3. To evidence the fact that the improvements have been completed, the City is executing this Release of Land. THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereby releases the Property described above from all obligations and conditions set forth in the Agreement Regarding Special Assessments dated October 25, 1995, filed with the Registrar of Titles as Document No. 2658009 on December 1, 1995. This Release of Land shall not release or discharge the Property from the lien of any special assessments levied by the City pursuant to the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie has executed the foregoing instrument. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE A Municipal Corporation BY: BY: Jean L. Harris Carl J. Jullie Its Mayor Its City Manager 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss HENNEPIN COUNTY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: TVD SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 52-153 Engineering Division Approve No Parking Resolution for CSAH 4 from CSAH 1 to Terrey Pine Rodney W. Rue Drive Recommended Action: Approve resolution prohibiting parking on CSAH 4 from CSAH 1 to Terrey Pine Drive. Primary Issues: This is a State Aid requirement for the CSAH 4 design which does not include parking lanes. The City obligation is to provide enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking. We anticipate that we will be bringing the construction plans for this CSAH 4 project to Council for plan approval probably in October. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROHIBITING PARKING ON CSAH 4 (EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD) I.C. 52-153 WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Public Works has prepared plans for the construction of CSAH 4 between CSAH 1 and Terrey Pine Drive within the corporate boundaries of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved the layout for said improvement of CSAH 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that the City agrees to provide enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking on those portions of CSAH 4 (Hennepin County Project 9016) within its corporate limits. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO:�/ G SECTION: Consent Calendar . DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5344 Engineering Division Request for Advance Encumberment of State Aid Highway Funds Rodney W. Rue Recommended Action: Approve resolution requesting advance encumberment of State Aid Highway Funds. Primary Issues: This resolution provides us the option of advancing a portion of our 1998 State Aid construction allotment to finance the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive Project. We intend to advance these funds only if MnDOT requires payment by the end of this year. Financial Issues: This will have no impact to our 1998 construction allotment. However, there is a possibility that we will not be able to advance funds if the State Aid's fund balance is lower than the statutory limit. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADVANCE ENCUMBERMENT OF STATE AID HIGHWAY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is planning on implementing Municipal State Aid Street Projects in 1997, which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account; and WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie is prepared to proceed with the construction of said projects through the use of advance encumbrances from the general State Aid Construction Account to supplement the available funds in their State Aid Construction Account; and WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subdivision 6 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8829. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council that the Commissioner of Transportation is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Projects of the City of Eden Prairie in an amount up to $620,000 in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820.1500, Subparagraph 10b, and to authorize repayments from the following year's accruals to the Construction Account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said City. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: F SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5398 Engineering Division Award Contract for Traffic Signals at the TH 212 and Fountain Place Rodney W. Rue Intersection Recommended Action: Approve resolution awarding contract to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. for traffic signals at the TH 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) and Fountain Place intersection. Overview: The City Council, on February 18, 1997, authorized staff to proceed with this signal project as a City project to be financed entirely with City funds. On August 5, 1997, the construction plans were approved and advertisement for bids were ordered. Financial Issues: Three bids were received on September 4, 1997 (see attached summary letter) with the lowest bid from Ridgedale Electric, Inc., in the amount of $149,300.00. The bids were higher than we expected, but were competitive. Bids for signals have been rising steadily for the past couple years. However, there are three components of this signal design that likely resulted in a higher bid. They include: • MnDOT's requirement that an interconnect be included in this project that will "tie" this signal into the existing interconnect signal system along TH 212. • MnDOT's requirement that red "LED" signal indicators be used. These indicators have a high initial cost, but use considerably less power. • Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP) was included in this project. After discussions with the Police Department, we have been including EVP in all traffic signal designs since early 1997. At the time we reported the total project cost to you, we used previous estimates and probably did not have a very good "handle" of what the total project costs were going to be with these additional components. With this bid, the resultant total project cost(including construction, design, and MnDOT-supplied equipment costs) is about $183,000 rather than the $165,000 reported earlier. The consultant did have a revised estimate of $145,000 for the signal construction with the actual bid being about 3% over their estimate. The entire project is proposed to be fmanced by the Tax Increment Fund. The bids were competitive and the costs will likely not go down in the future unless the City Council is willing to wait a couple years for MnDOT to install the signal. However, we would still be responsible for half the signal costs plus all the design costs, which we have already paid. Therefore, even though the costs are higher than expected, we would recommend that we proceed with the project and award the contract to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. in the amount of$149,300.00. r CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 96-5398 - Traffic Signals at the TH 212 and Fountain Place Intersection bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC, INC. as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with Ridgedale Electric, Inc. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $149,300.00 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2- Westwood Professional Services,Inc. 14180 West Highway 5 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 September 5, 1997 Phone:612-937-5150 e p Fax:612-937-5822 Toll Free:1-888-937-5150 Email:wps@westwoodps.com Mr. Rodney W. Rue, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Award of Contract Traffic Control Signal System T.H. 212 at Fountain Place City Project No. I. C. 96-5398 Dear Mr. Rue: On September 4, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., three bids were received and opened for the above referenced project. We have reviewed the bids submitted to the City of Eden Prairie and determined that Ridgedale Electric, Inc. has submitted the lowest responsible bid. The following summary is provided: Engineer's Estimate $145,000.00 Ridgedale Electric, Inc $149,300.00 ColliSys $149,970.00 Electric Service Company, Inc. $152,750.00 The Ridgedale Electric, Inc., bid is approximately 3.0% above the Engineer's Estimate for the project. We recommend that the City award the project to Ridgedale Electric, Inc., in accordance with their proposal form. Respectfully submitted, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. a124-Ut 5- SA?,itAaek_. Allan S. Klugman, P. E. Principal Transportation Engineer 3 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: rn� SECTION: Consent Calendar . v, DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5398 Engineering Division Approve Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MnDOT for signals at TH Rodney W. Rue 212 and Fountain Place Recommended Action: Approve Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 76696 with MnDOT for traffic signals at the TH212 and Fountain Place intersection. Overview: The City Council, on February 18, 1997, authorized staff to proceed with this project as a City project to be financed entirely with City funds. Primary Issues: This agreement describes the financial and maintenance responsibilities for this signal project. The City is responsible for the construction, design, and MnDOT-supplied equipment costs, as well as our standard maintenance responsibilities. The State will be responsible for their standard signal maintenance. Financial Issues: This agreement includes an estimated cost of $15,000 for MnDOT-supplied signal equipment. This equipment cost, together with other project costs, are proposed to be financed entirely with Tax Increment Funds. If the City Council awards the contract (other Council action), we would recommend approval of Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 76696 with MnDOT for the amount of$15,000. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT FOR SIGNALS AT THE TH 212 (FLYING CLOUD DRIVE) AND FOUNTAIN PLACE INTERSECTION I.C. 96-5398 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Eden Prairie have cooperated to prepare construction plans and specifications for a traffic signal at the TH212 (Flying Cloud Drive) and Fountain Place intersection, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved said plans and specifications for the signal improvements at TH 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) and Fountain Place; and WHEREAS, a traffic control signal agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Eden Prairie has been prepared which identifies the maintenance and financial obligations of each agency for the signal improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that Traffic Control Signal Agreement.No. 76696 for S.P. 2744-53, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 76696 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE TO Install a new Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption, Interconnect and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) at Fountain Place, in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2744-53 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED City of Eden Prairie $15, 000 . 00 None Otherwise Covered THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" , and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as the "City" , WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161 .20 (1994) authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system; and WHEREAS, it is justified and considered mutually desirable to install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) at Fountain Place; and WHEREAS, the City requests and the State agrees to provide an Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption System, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System" , as a part of the new traffic control signal installation on Trunk Highway No . 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) at Fountain Place and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, it is considered in the public' s best interest for the State to provide a new cabinet and controller for said new traffic control signal . Such materials as described immediately above shall hereinafter be referred to as "State furnished materials" ; and 76696 -11- l WHEREAS, the City and State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption, interconnect and signing as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1 . The City with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall install the new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) at Fountain Place in accordance with the plan and specifications for State Project No. 2744-53 , all at no cost and expense to the State. 2 . The State will furnish to the City the State furnished materials to be installed with the City work provided in Paragraph 1 . Estimated cost for State furnished materials is $15, 000 . 00 . City' s share is 100 percent . 3 . Upon execution and approval of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, the City shall advance to the State an amount equal to its portion of the costs as specified in Paragraph 3 . The City' s costs shall be based on the estimated costs for State furnished materials . 4 . Upon compilation of the actual costs for State furnished materials, the amount of the funds advanced by the City in excess of the City' s share will be returned to the City without interest and the City agrees to pay to the State that 76696 -2- amount of its share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the City. 5 . The construction work provided for herein shall be under the direction and supervision of the City. It is agreed, however, that the State shall have the right to periodically inspect said construction work. 6 . The City shall provide an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said new traffic control signal with street lights installation shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of the City. 7 . Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 1 hereof, it shall be the City' s responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; (2) relamp the traffic control signal and street lights, except for the Red LED signal indications and the Pedestrian Don' t Walk LED indications which shall be relamped by the State for the 5 year warranty period and by the City thereafter; and (3) clean and paint the traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions . It shall be the State' s responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain the signing and interconnect and to perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 76696 -3- 8 . The EVP System provided for in Paragraph 1 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements : a) All maintenance of the EVP System shall be done by State forces . b) Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169 . 01, Subdivision 5 and 169 . 03 . The City will provide the State' s Assistant Division Engineer or his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units . c) Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the State immediately. d) In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receivers, infrared 76696 -4- 77 detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the City. e) All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation. 9 . Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the State and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker' s Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the State. The City shall not be responsible under the Worker' s Compensation Act for any employees of the State. 10 . Timing of the traffic control signal provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State . 76696 -5- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney Mayor (City Seal) By City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By Assistant Division Engineer Assistant Commissioner Dated APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION By Assistant Attorney General State of Minnesota Dated DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE By Dated 76696 -6- 9 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eden Prairie enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 212 (Flying Cloud Drive) at Fountain Place in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 76696, a copy of which was before the Council . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Eden Prairie I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Eden Prairie at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1997 , as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk (Seal) Iv DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: ly Il. SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Mount Plat Two Randy Slick Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Mount Plat Two subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$250.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$774.00 • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Receipt and recording of cross-access and maintenance agreement for common driveways and storm sewers. Background: This proposal consists of replatting Outlot A of KMSP Plaza Addition into one lot for construction of an 18,000 square foot office building on 1.57 acres. The plat is located at the southwest corner of Flying Cloud Drive and Prairie Center Drive. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council August 19, 1997. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on September 16, 1997. RS:ssa cc: Steve Michaels Lloyd Pew, Hanson, Thorpe, Pellinen, Olson CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MOUNT PLAT TWO WHEREAS, the plat of Mount Plat Two has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Mount Plat Two is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated September 2, 1997. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2 MOUNT PLAT TWO C.R. DOC. NO. KNOW AU.MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Volley View,LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company,fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin,Stott of Minnesota,to wit: Oullot A,KMSP Plato Has coated the some to be surveyed and platted as MOUNT PLAT TWO and does hereby donate and dedicote to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on this plat. In witness whereof sold Valley Vow,LLC,has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 199_ . SIGNED: VALLEY NEW.U.C. By Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ,....";.:,'1::',...) COUNTY OF , The foregoing Instrument was oNnowledged before this daa Iknited Ibball Minnesota corn of 99�by l�•�•"I r Ss6y the of ValleyView,LLC, y company,on behalf ("N 1 121p2 ..kb of said company. r / \ 6 f 5 • �••,�•,-` ryYti A9 / / 55,5 Mytoo.nmisekin expires County.Minnesota I hereby certify that I hove surveyed and plotted the kind described on this plot oe MOUNT PLAT TWO;that this plat r,l• is a correct representation of sold survey,that all distance ore correctly shown on said plot 1n feet and hundredths of r f' // o loot; that oh monuments have been correctly placed in the ground os shown said plat; that the outside N(`(, I boundary Iinea ore correctly designated on said plot; and that there are no eetlonds,as defined h MS 505.02,Subd. • Agry9/ 1 I,or public highways to be designated sob Plot `'Ix• SO (,,, "t;. I N Uoyd E.Pew•Land Surveyor / I.�;! s Minnesota License 18421 C., r! i ILI STATE OF MINNESOTA ,�}'L ,1•:✓ I :`, COUNTY OF 1'ri 6 // (-' The foregoing surveyor's199 if of by was E.Pew. ki Surveyor. a this day of L Uoyd wLandyor,uhne>oto License No.18421. S6\ryti 0 O (yT Notary Public. County,Minnesota / a L, My commission expires \ I N EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA // \ ,r I� .LOT 1 I K Ft` This plot of MOUNT PLAT TWO woe approved and accepted by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota of a regular meeting thereof held this - day of 199_ If oppncable.the written \ 1._1 �� comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Traneportotion and the County Hlghwoy Engineer hove been \ (`,.%•;r I preceived by the City or the peescrbed 30 day period hoe lapsed without receipt of such comments and � t (l_ recommendations,os provided by Minnesota Statutes,Section 505.03,Subd.2. ;n r: CITY COUNdL OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA 1�;� Z1,. \\ BLOCK 1 By Moyer �� "n'I �v \ I Q ()- By City Manager c, t\ TAXPAYER'SERMCES DIVISION,HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA '',\ ''C1 \ _ I hereby certify that loses poyabie In 19_and prior years have been paid for the land described on this plat. ,',.r `,, \ --_ • 3 Doted this day of 199_. A Patrick H.O'Connor,Hennepin County Auditor By Deputy l \ ' • p rP \ s 44Y 9'S0" ?0195.. Nn SURVEY SECTION.HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA 00 \ / \ R = 105.00 S�4y�•57, Pursuant to Minn.Statutes.Section 3638.565(1969).this plat has been approved this \ L= 81.24 doy of 199_. S v Gory F.Caswell,Hennepin County Surveyor By A // 1 n Ay_ /-\7.�'1� J 1 -� I COUNTY RECORDER,HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA Scale In feet S6\�' r r ` I hereby certify that the within plot of MOUNT PLAT TWO woe Red for record In this office this - v DRAINAGE AND UTUTY EASEMENTS ARE SNOYIN THUS: day of 199 et o'clock 0 30 60 90 • C �� •�y I R.Don Carlson.County Recorder By Deputy ‘\'''. IS o— I"— THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS ASSUMED 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT I BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT UNES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,ANO 10 FEET IN VRDTf UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING RIGHT-CF-WAY UNES.AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT 11C.9 H enSen Thorp • __E-771, Petllnen Olson Inc. DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO:-7-(, SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Final Plat Approval of Mount Plat Three Division Randy Slick Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Mount Plat Three subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$1,088.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$1,190.00 • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Receipt trail easement. Background: This proposal consists of replatting Outlot A of Edenvale 24th Addition into one lot for construction of a 56,900 square foot office building on 10.88 acres. The plat is located along Equitable Drive. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council August 19, 1997. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on September 16, 1997. RS:ssa cc: Steve Michaels Lloyd Pew, Hanson, Thorpe, Pellinen, Olson CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MOUNT PLAT THREE WHEREAS, the plat of Mount Plat Three has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Mount Plat Three is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated September 2, 1997. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2 • MOUNT PLAT THREE R.T. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. a New York corporation. Ise owner of the following described property situated In the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, I to it: \ I Outiot A.EDENVALE 24TH ADDITION, Hennepin County.Minnesota. \ \ EDEN'�ALi �_:y„CV Ti tf Has caueed the same to be wrwwd and platted as MOUNT PLAT THREE and do. nareby donate and dedicate to a TER N •A 1 r' the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on thin ilia ,_D_�'l�/I�1._._ N [� 1"�! r" 7� In an...whereof said Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United Stales, has caused these presents to be signed 1a3 9.' l 1 THREEX:Cs,Li Ti1 by Its proper officer this day of 199- / kei ?9�7�• - bryro^ N. \+1144 OOf3•l DRIVE g STATE OF MINNESOTA N87'42'34'W 325.25 COUNTY CF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 199__,by . the `Tjt` % of The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a New York corporation, on behalf of sold corporation. cs 1 N. ?�/' Notary Public County, Minnesota '.3 \N‘ b ^J'/',` 81 24 E DE 1./A: My canmhnion eopNes 0 t �1 g 1G ; rl,.Y,. N66 I — �y \\. A'.'' /2TS� / /QI 05� 1 !4!C1 1 hereby certify that I haw wrwwp and platNd the land described on this plot as MOUNT PLAT THREE; that this h 7 ���r 49.E 6? `� plot ie a correct repnsantation o7 sak wrny, toot all dktonees on corcactly Mown on sold plot in feet and ��:nTj6' fig• 1 r.ndredths of a foot; that all monuments haw been correctly placed In the areund as shown on sold plat; s.,, '�I`',, M J .1.3* • 1.1;T J�l1 that the tsids Doundaryy lines ors blic hI y designated sold plat; and that mere ors no wetlands, as / 1yJ 1;`W Ater,1 ON defined in MS 5G3.02, SuDd. 1, W public highways to De designaled rold Dl ot. PURGARORY . e 1 2 CREEK-y �, I�j ' ro / �/ ---.DRAINAGE AN0 UTIUTY EASEMENT -c.` r Uoyd E.Pew,Land Surveyor / ; �/ `j:.l', s. N Minnesota Ucense 18421 W. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF g The foregoing 10rveyors ertfReata woe cknowledged Dtore me tnie da of 1'T� Ttos \�' 199_� by Uoyd E. Pew,Land Surveyor,Minnesota Uaense No. IPA. z /^ S89'56'22'E 1059.87 o Notary Pubik, - County. Minnesota My eommisden expires rl 1� r,Tr-i, .,. ,f EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA This plat of MOUNT PLAT THREE woe approved and accepted by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota of a regular meeting thereof held this day of _ aportatlon 9ana Ne if applicable, the written comments and recommenda/kns of the Commluloner of Tyyran aailp County Highway Engineer now Deen nc.ndo by. a Cprodded D Minnessota3S atute.. SSeection 500.03 Subd. 2. receipt of such eogln.er w. neommelnsd bns, :is y 1 CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA INBy Mayor k . , . By City Manager TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION.HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA ORMNAGE AND UTEl7Y EASEMENTS ME 910F i 1RUS' I hereby certHY that loxes a prioryears N plot. Dated thin payable In 1day of and rs have b 9Q Id for the land described on this Patrick H.O'Connor.Hennepin County Auditor By Deputy SURVEY SECTION.HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA 10--I Pursuant to Minn. Statute. Section 3838.565(1969). this plot has been approved this e I Seel. In Net day el 199 Gay F. Caswell.Hennepin County Surveyor By O 100 200 303 REGISTRAR OF TITLES,HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA I hereby eertHy that the within e t of MOUNT PLAT THREE was Ned19 at n this office this 10 FEET N ADJOINING AND ADJONG LOT UNES. o'clock y�M. UNLESS OTHkRM1SE RIDICA119,AND 10 FEET N MD111 UNLESS OTHERMSE INDICATED AND MJONING DIE DANS CO DEMMES IS ASSUMED R. Dan Carlson.Registrar of Titles. By Deputy RIGHT-OF-WAY UNES AS SNOMN ON 711E PLAT O DENOTES NON MOMIMEIT Hansen Thorp Pellinen peon Inc. i 1ITT ee.....s..w......e.....ee F:\XEIS\97-084\tLAT064.0WG DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: T/T SECTION: Consent Calendar ' DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Bearpath 6th Addition Randy Slick Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Bearpath 6th Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$287.00 • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement Background: Bearpath Partnership is requesting Council approval of the next phase of the Bearpath PUD, consisting of seven single family lots and one outlot lying west of Purgatory Creek. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council October 4, 1994. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on November 1, 1994. JJ:ssa cc: John Vogelbacher, Sienna Corporation James R. Hill, Inc. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BEARPATH 6TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Bearpath 6th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Bearpath 6th Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated September 4, 1997. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2. • BEARPATH SIXTH ADDITION z R.T. DOC. NO. p IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Robert H. Enebak,married, has hereunto eel his hand this _day of A- / 9_ • SCALE IN FEET dJ / '( (�• / es Signed. Robert H.Enebak 0 100 200 300 r,) i' (` ' S.. 0,... C..) / BY Robert M Enebak 0 t /'.I h I/ `( -C3 - / STATE OF MINNESOTA / W e8 Ap •�^ / EV- t COUNTY OF • / Pg N ��E be O�i Ob7Jz. 21.37 tl (..A- C, /`•%/ The I regoi trumeol acknowledged before me this dal 0l d 8� . / Lod iti ,h. Jp f pe ti .�. D'B / e( 19_by DenH Enebak mewled. iicnnisnTii TITRE', yi• :s �4i`�':7 �'^ %//� a< 41e1tl^g55 i deR.1b.00 e( /,� .,v.!Tt O•: ba N \ f\ 1 1// S 00'38'32'E D III 16 / IV Notary Public. S b 0 -Vy 204.11 - O .4 1g0 8 A` Courtly.Minnesota ajgti ''9 : i a434.-" o:o •w .e.& gwJs„ ' Rs, , / My Commission Expires Janwry SL 2:2 S29•gR m.0 a -w fp. ik 4A 0.15 0 U T L 0 T A .°'arts I ti°' .ail e w p '1 -gal •'i T \ ,O z re 1 Dear .4. xps.11 1ec_ta�e5, t i Y.^8-I/ ,.��s. T J�e7 A- I hereby of that I have surveyed and latted the I described on this plat as BEARPATH 1 i ., _ /� / Y certify YP Proper 1 P a \f ••0 t - f 7t-l f 3l e! � ,v tl Ds R r- N I'si to •J zOJ e W J [' SIXTH ADDITION; that this plat ts a correct representation of the ur r that all distances are s °-layay:oY \ e•'t .r5 ,4rb�r. II - �_ v:I:a•7• I- I".q, '� IL ej. correctly shown an the plat In feet and hundredths of a foot; that it monuments have been I ,,'C1,0'°t°sf.a I I - I� a o I' 9 a� I' 1j,ace 'fL3 I correctly placed in the ground s shown or will be placed as required by the local governmental a;, r:a;li •nt ?. R {. $ i I Po ?DJ•) ; unit: that the outside boundaryMee arecorrectly designated the plat; end that there are nu m OUMOT By u • -M1;1° ,,, 1 t,, r II- 3 I" 4 7I q d, �.r �� D•,e t X o SI h a ag e, iW 5 5 XI 0. 3� o''p / wetlands as defined In tic 50 02 Sobel lr public highways to be designated. •a•,4540 °,; r`� "i ii3 2 x'� ° P ~I I� !«i 8 w/p °-n1 a�.b O ?/ Harold C.Peterson.Land Surveyor • \D',e yl I'^ • •$ i� IN -° ..I I F Minnesota License No.12294 ' BLOC 1 i1 ,, 7 f 1, 5.00 209.95 f ' ___1o2sZ____,I, _tt9.90 -I uo DD_._!L Flo.°° I ,," II' • Nt0a•49.E -ro.5,•' /� r 720.92 ..1.-.J�aD_D_. _i; tam/ 'y:r/f• / "- STATE OF MINNESOTA d 40'S e4i4. S 0152'33"W -�� �'. ,� $8 COUNTY OF SO 'k• 9�• /: �'yQ�ah' The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of ?y9� �tdF JFw/ p% 19_.by Harold C. Peterson.Lend Surveyor.Minnesota tisane Na 12294. H O L; % r, �, :y r. i H T fi i, . r. .. v �+ H/ea / Notary Public. County.Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31.2000 ' KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS. That Bearpath Limited Partnership.a Mlnneaola Limited Partnership. EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA fee owner.Norwest Bank Minnesota,National Association,a National Banking Amoelatlon,morlgegee,and Robert H. Enebak. married,mortgagee of the following described land situated In the County of Hennepin.State of This plat of BEARPATH SIXTH ADDITION was appeased and accepted by the City Council of Eden Yinneaole,to wit prairie.Minnesota eta regular meeting thereof,held this_ day of . I9_.If Oohed D,BEARPATH FIFTH ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County,Minnesota applicable.the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation end the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations.as provided by Minnesota Have caused the same to be surveyed end platted es BEARPATH SIXTH ADDITION.and'do hereby donate end Statutes.Section DOS 03.Subdivision 2 dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE.MINNESOTA purpose.. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Bearpath Limited Partnership.a Minnesota thrilled Partnership,has caused these BY: .Mayor presents to be signed by Its proper partner this say of .19_ •Signed: Bearpath Limited Partnership BY: Manager • By Bearpath Development Corporation.Its general partner // TAXPAYER SERVICES'DIVISION.Hennepin County.Minnesota •DENOtES 1/2 INCH a 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND BY: its President I hereby certify that taxes payable In_and prior years have been paid for land described on John Henkinson this plat.Dated this day of ..19_ • O DENOTES I/O INCH x 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND STATE OF MINNESOTA PATRICK H.O'CONNOR, Hennepin County Auditor MARKED BY REGISTRATION NO.12294. COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me thls_day of t9_. by John BY: .Deputy Henkinson,President of Beerpelh Development Corporation,a Minnesota corporation.a general partner of Bearpath Limited Partnership.a Minnesota Limited Partnership.on behalf of the Partnership. SURVEY SECTION.Hennepin County.Minnesota Pursuant to Minn.Slat Sec.313313.585(1969)this plat has been approved this _.day A t A s/n 1,5111.11 Notary Public. of ,19_. County,Minnesota I 1I� My Commission Expires January 31,2000 Cary F Caswell,Hennepin County Surveyor !-T N WITNESS WHEREOF,said Normal.Bank Minnesota,National Association.it National Banking Association.has BY L 1"-! caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of ,19_ . Signed. Norwest Bank Minnesota REGISTRAR OF TITLES,Hennepin County.Minnesota 1_J L_1_ BY ila I hereby certify that the within plat of BEARPATH SIXTH ADDITION was flied for record in this office Ihis_dey of .19_.at_o'clock_.M. NOT TD SCALE I R Den Carlson.County Recorder 9ErNG 5 rut IN MIN AND ADJOINING LOr STATE OF MINNESOTA LNE.UNLESS SSmo trioSE 0O105550 MTN u°N,p THE COUNTY OF BY: Deputy O5090DE RIONTINDIC OF nor UDN,ES.UNLESS The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of E PLAT 19_� by the of Norwest Bank Minnesota.National Association.a National Banking Association,on behalf of the Association Notary Public, E°nnty,Mlnneaole JAMES R. HILL, INC. My Commission Expires Jenuery 3I,2000 • • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar September 16, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. 2nd Reading of Ordinances Approving Community Development Heritage Site Designations IV. K BACKGROUND: The first reading of Ordinances approving Heritage Site Designation for the Cummins-Phipps-Grill Homestead, Lookout Park Wayside, Purgatory Creek Bridge (Creek Knoll Road), Riley-Jacques Farm, Fredrick-Miller Spring, and Smith-Douglas-More House was approved on September 2, 1997. REQUESTED ACTION: Approve 2nd Reading of Ordinances approving Heritage Site Designation for the six sites. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE NUMBER 0001: THE CUMMINS-PHIPPS-GRILL HOMESTEAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The legal description and attached boundary map is hereby adopted as the official Heritage Preservation Site map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0001: The Cummins- Phipp s-Grill Homestead; SECTION 2. That all lands within the official Heritage Preservation Site Boundary Map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0001: The Cummins-Phipps-Grill Homestead be and hereby is designated a Heritage Preservation Site as provided in City Code Section 11.05; SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council ofthe City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 2- CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE NUMBER 0002: THE LOOKOUT PARK WAYSIDE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The legal description and attached boundary map is hereby adopted as the official Heritage Preservation Site map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0002: The Lookout Park Wayside; SECTION 2. That all lands within the official Heritage Preservation Site Boundary Map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0002: The Lookout Park Wayside be and hereby is designated a Heritage Preservation Site as provided in City Code Section 11.05; SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE NUMBER 0003: THE PURGATORY CREEK BRIDGE (BRIDGE L8073) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The legal description and attached boundary map is hereby adopted as the official Heritage Preservation Site map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0003: The Purgatory Creek Bridge (Bridge L8073); SECTION 2. That all lands within the official Heritage Preservation Site Boundary Map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0003: The Purgatory Creek Bridge (Bridge L8073) and hereby is designated a Heritage Preservation Site as provided in City Code Section 11.05; SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE NUMBER 0004: THE RILEY-JACQUES FARMSTEAD THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The legal description and attached boundary map is hereby adopted as the official Heritage Preservation Site map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0004: The Riley- Jacques Farmstead; SECTION 2. That all lands within the official Heritage Preservation Site Boundary Map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0004: The Riley-Jacques Homestead and hereby is designated a Heritage Preservation Site as provided in City Code Section 11.05; SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 5 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE NUMBER 0005: THE FREDRICK-MILLER SPRING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The legal description and attached boundary map is hereby adopted as the official Heritage Preservation Site map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0005: The Fredrick- Miller Spring; SECTION 2. That all lands within the official Heritage Preservation Site Boundary Map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0005: The Fredrick-Miller Spring and hereby is designated a Heritage Preservation Site as provided in City Code Section 11.05; SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1997,finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AS HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE NUMBER 0006: THE SMITH-DOUGLAS-MORE HOUSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The legal description and attached boundary map is hereby adopted as the official Heritage Preservation Site map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0006: The Smith- Douglas-More House; SECTION 2. That all lands within the official Heritage Preservation Site Boundary Map for Heritage Preservation Site Number 0006: The Smith-Douglas-More House and hereby is designated a Heritage Preservation Site as provided in City Code Section 11.05; SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of September, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/16 I SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. it Y,1- DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Facilities Management Liquor Store - Change Order#4 Barbara Cross RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of change order#4 in the amount of$28,026.00. This change order will increase the liquor store construction contract to the new total of$1,267,745.39. BACKGROUND: The original plans for the liquor store building originally showed a 2:1 slope on the north side of the building adjacent to Super 8 Hotel. Due to excessive runoff from heavy rains this summer the slopes were not workable and could not be stabilized. The addition of the modular block retaining wall not only stabilized the slopes and eliminated an ongoing maintenance problem, but it allowed the liquor store to open closer to the anticipated time. The changes are described in detail on the attached page. The construction contract is nearly completed with final paper work and the punch list items left to complete. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The money for the additional improvements will be funded with proceeds from the liquor store operations. The additional amount for this change order is still within the anticipated budget amount. i Eden Prairie Municipal Development Eden Prairie, MN tete)/ Change Order No.: 4 30 June 1997 MICHAEL) WILKUS AIA JEFFREY M.PAPP AIA Description Item No.1: DELETE 330 square foot retaining wall. ($ 3,960.00) Item No.2: 1,507 square foot retaining wall as designed and $31,712.00 issued by Landform as directed by the Client. Item No.3: ADD irrigation spray valves at redesigned retaining $ 274.00 wall. TOTAL Change Order No. 4 $28,026.00 w:\jobs\epliquor\co#4.wpd MIGUAEL J. WILKUS APCI-IITEGTS, INC. 14180 wEST 78TH STREET EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA (b12)Q4Q-0485 55344 (FAX)Q4Q-Q047. CHANGE Distribution to: ORDER OWNER ❑ ARCHITECT 0 A/A DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR 0 FIELD 0 OTHER 0 PROJECT: milrgAre,,, tclr�'� ir CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 4' (name, address) MN ,4- Mqp I INITIATION DATE: �J� 1 1 t TO (Contractor): 1 Hi cots cettf ` ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: clew 13-1o5 / P r1� �`I►` CONTRACT FOR: MuNIG1rAtL, t/146 1'Vo FV Ioo Mr t/ L11,YM l )(V'� 55441 CONTRACT DATE: la t x: 2 t Illp You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: • E /TT/GN . Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was $ 1tt'2_t 100.00q • Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ I$�&M. J t • The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was $ ` 2� '11°t 1 1 1 The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) 4e444a+gged* by this Change Order $ 0 The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be $ i Stin 14 1 • The Contract Time will be ) t (unchanged) by ) ) ( 0 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is el Jose tom Authorized: M1oJL 3.VIII, ) Ara t Imo 1-1014 t ioNs-iKtki f1GN co. (il1Y.0 SEW Mire o 2 SST) 5U1f 11I T �1 �U-M M M .�.f SUITS ice P Mrrae . 1 Address Address Address ev 1 1(< x.11 4r 553 ftvo� i.141 54*1 344' BY 1 4llir BY BY DATEA1 .2155i- DATE DATE AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA'a • © 1978 G701_,1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK yZVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9/16_/97� SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. 1V,in 1- DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Facilities Management Liquor Store - Change Order#5 Barbara Cross RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of change order#5 in the amount of$33,332.00. This change order will increase the liquor store construction contract to the new total of$1,301,077.39 BACKGROUND: The City let the contract for construction of the building before the tenant space was leased. It was not known how many tenants or what specific buildout terms each tenant would need. Money therefore, was set aside to meet the needs and conditions for tenant specific needs. Change Order#5 includes items for buildout of tenant space not contained in the original contract. Hollywood Video signed a ten year lease and occupies the 7100 square feet of rentable space. Terms of the buildout were negiotiated and are described in more detail on the attached page. The building is substantially complete with only the final paperwork and punchlist items to be completed. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Improvements will be funded with proceeds from the liquor store operations. The money set aside for buildout in the original budget more than covers the amount of the change order. Eden Prairie Municipal Development Eden Prairie, MN I jeitiyij7 Change Order No.: 5 1 July 1997 MICHAEL j WILKUS AIA JEFFPEY M,RAPP AIA Description Item No.1: ADD concrete slab at tenant space as directed $ 4,594.00 by the Client. Item No.2: ADD four(4) rooftop units at tenant space as $24,540.00 directed by the Client. Item No.3: ADD electrical service at tenant space as directed $ 5.156.00 by the Client. TOTAL Change Order No. 5 - $33,332.00 w:\jobs\epliquor\co#5.wpd, MICI-IAEL J. WILKUS ARCHITECTS, INC. 14180 WEST 78Tu STREET EDEN PRAIRIE MINNESOTA (b12)Q4Q-0Q85 55344 (F12)0 444-Q047 CHANGE Distribution to: ORDER OWNER 0 ' AIA DOCUMENT G701 ARCHITECT 0 CONTRACTOR 0 • FIELD 0 OTHER 0 • PROJECT: . eVell rgAime,�,,P� �itAt-G r .I.G bseur . CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 5(name, address) $ t1)'Wi N i 1E)I N 55 INITIATION DATE: 1 JW,Y rril TO (Contractor): EH f t oI y n4I —] ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 7 1510�5 2m A L PORI I CONTRACT FOR: Nu(j1°t, t,10. EVrore litie 100 S 1 Lgt :(A �Mil,tt"Y��'� �I J CONTRACT DATE: la ()crag I1160 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: • Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) was $ t,t2t (00,00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ f 4�� 9) • The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was $ /A'��l"'i ,M • The (Contract Sum) will be (increased)4rtieere^=r='.4enel+a+rgedt by this Change Order $ * ,� The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be $ I,4/ t 0'1')•',1 The Contract Time will be (increased)•(desreas�} r ed}by 1 - ( ?> ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is 2 11 tern . Authorized: IMF,A.WU.*AllaITE/T4 Its IliNgieterb CANSTrtienal co. rim,or Erfli rrtgrie A tTEWfo!r 13 I .iittm. 5U11n 111 �ftg4 No. SUCIv IUD 1t rre.f m49 . Address Address 1 Address gl J PLYhSo1y AN 5 �1 ��i: .�1:a y._� r :�s. �1110Pr BY BY BY V_� .I► A. DATE DATE DATE Ct—Z 97 AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AlAd • ® 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORE AVE., N.W..WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 3 G701—1978 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9-16-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR _ A ITEM NO. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.57 acres and Rezoning from C-Reg to Office on 1.57 acres; 2. Adopt the Site Plan Review on 1.57 acres; 3. Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 38-97-PUD-26-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the C-Reg District and be placed in the Office Zoning District 38-97-PUD-26-97 (hereinafter "PUD-26-97-Office"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 16, 1997, entered into between Valley View L.L.C., and the City of Eden Prairie(hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-26-97-Office, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-26-97-Office is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-26-97-Office designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-26-97-Office are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-26-97-Office is of sufficient size,composition,and arrangement that its construction,marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the C-Reg District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-26-97-Office and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. 2 Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled"General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled"Violation a Misdemeanor"are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of August, 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16th day of September, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on . MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 38-97-PUD-26-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER,AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT,AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99,WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Valley View Road and Prairie Center Drive from C-Reg to Office on 1.57 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/ John D. Frane /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) Mountview Office Building Exhibit A Legal Description: Outlot A,KMSP Plaza S MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING BY VALLEY VIEW L.L.C. WHEREAS, Valley View L.L.C. has applied for Site Plan approval of Mountview Office Building on 1.57 acres for construction of a 18,500 sq. ft. 2-story office building located at Valley View Road and Prairie Center Drive,to be zoned from C-Reg to Office District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on August 19, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 28, 1997, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its August 19, 1997, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Valley View L.L.C. for the construction of a 18,500 sq. ft. 2 story office building,based on plans dated August 12, 1997,between Valley View L.L.C., and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk U/ DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT MOUNTVIEW OFFICE BUILDING THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of September 16, 1997, by Valley View L.L.C., a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 109 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.57 acres, Zoning District Change from C-Regional to Office on 1.57 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.57 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 1.57 acres into 1 lot for construction of an 18,500 sq. ft. office building, all on 1.57 acres legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 97-154 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. 3S-91 for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from C-Regional to Office, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 97-155 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 12, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 19, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved utility plans concurrent with building construction and prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 7 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property,Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. The Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan prior to acceptance of public utilities. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to release of the grading bond. 5. CROSS ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to issuance of any building permit for the Property, the Developer shall enter into a cross access and maintenance agreement with the adjoining properties. This Agreement shall address joint vehicle access and maintenance in driveways and storm sewers. All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer or Owner. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that the cross access and maintenance agreement has been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Titles'Office. 6. PROOF OF PARKING SPACES: Developer and City acknowledge that the 6 proof of parking spaces proposed for the Property, depicted in Exhibit B, are not required to be constructed at this time. At such time as the City Manager, in his/her sole discretion, determines that it is necessary for all or a portion of the proof of parking spaces to be constructed in order to accommodate the building use, the City Manager shall notify the Developer in writing of the need to construct additional proof of parking spaces. This notification shall include the number, location and timetable for construction of the additional proof-of-parking spaces. Developer shall comply with all requirements contained in the City Manager's notification. 7. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property,Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees that the materials to be used for the retaining wall shall be modular masonry. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 8. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. No spray from irrigation heads shall obstruct public sidewalk. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 10. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Pla ner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 11. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. 9 Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in his/her sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 12. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash, trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all times be located inside of the building enclosures depicted on Exhibit B. 13. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 30 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 14. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the Office Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD -Z6-97 Waiver from the 30%maximum impervious surface permitted for the Property to 56%. 15. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, hold harmless, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorney's fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release,hold harmless, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. /0 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9-16-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. Rd, DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 10.88 acres and Rezoning from Rural to Office on 10.88 acres; 2. Adopt the Site Plan Review on 10.88 acres; 3. Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement I PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 39-97-PUD-27-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Office Zoning District 39-97-PUD-27-97 (hereinafter"PUD-27-97-Office"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of September 16, 1997,entered into between Prairieview L.L.C., and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-27-97-Office, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-27-97-Office is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-27-97-Office designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-27-97-Office are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-27-97-Office is of sufficient size,composition,and arrangement that its construction,marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-27-97-Office and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled"General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 19th day of August, 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 16th day of September, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 39-97-PUD-27-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER,AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT,AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 7800 Equitable Drive from Rural to Office on 10.88 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) y Exhibit A Prairieview Office Building Legal Description: Outlot A, Edenvale 24th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING BY PRAIRIEVIEW L.L.C. WHEREAS, Prairieview L.L.C.has applied for Site Plan approval of Prairieview Office Building on 10.88 acres for construction of a 56,899 sq. ft. 2-story office building located at 7800 Equitable Drive,to be zoned from Rural to Office District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on August 19, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 28, 1997, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its August 19, 1997, meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Prairieview L.L.C. for the construction of a 56,899 sq. ft. 2 story office building,based on plans dated August 12, 1997,between Prairieview L.L.C., and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on September 16, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Cp DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of September 16, 1997, by Prairieview L.L.C., a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 10.88 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 10.88 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 10.88 acres, Site Plan Review on 10.88 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 10.88 acres into 1 lot for construction of a 56,900 sq. ft. office building, all on 10.88 acres legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 97-156 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance No.39-97 for PUD District Review and Zoning District Cbange, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 97-157 for Preliminary Plat Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated August 12, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on August 19, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for storm sewer. Plans shall meet City requirements. Construction shall be inspected and certified by the design engineer. Record drawings are required. A permit fee of five percent of construction value shall be paid by Developer to City for the portion of public infrastructure. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved utility plans concurrent with building construction and prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 7 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. The Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan prior to acceptance of public utilities. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations, turf restoration procedures and staging plan. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan in accordance with the staging plan and supplemental directives of the City under the Erosion Control Policy. 5. PRETREATMENT PONDS: Prior to final plat approval on the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's written approval of plans and design information for all storm water quality facilities to be constructed on the Property. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved storm water quality facility plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the Property, Developer shall provide to the City Engineer proof that the pond size has not diminished from the original design volume because of sedimentation, erosion or other causes, and that the pond has been restored to its original volume if the pond size has diminished. 6. TRAIL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources and obtain the Director's written approval of detailed plans for trails to be constructed on the Property. Developer shall convey access easements for such trails in such locations as determined by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Director. Trails shall be constructed in the following locations: A. An eight-foot wide bituminous trail to be located along the easterly property line as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto. 0 B. Reconstruction of the existing 8-foot aglime trail due to the construction of the NURP pond. Trail to follow approximately the 832 elevation contour. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved plans in accordance with the terms of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 7. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type,and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Restoration of the disturbed grass slopes shall be seeded with MnDOT mixture 700. Developer agrees to permanently demarcate the location of the northerly boundary of the existing scenic conservation easement area with permanent posts. All lawn and landscaped areas shall not extend into the existing scenic conservation easement area. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 9. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees that the materials to be used shall be modular masonry. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 10. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 11. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in his/her sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 12. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 13. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash, trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all times be located inside of the building enclosures depicted on Exhibit B. 14. PROOF OF PARKING SPACES: Developer and City acknowledge that the 21 proof of parking spaces proposed for the Property, depicted in Exhibit B, are not required to be constructed at this time. At such time as the City Manager, in his/her sole discretion, determines that it is necessary for all or a portion of the proof of parking spaces to be constructed in order to accommodate the building use, the City Manager shall notify the Developer in writing of the need to construct additional proof of parking spaces. This notification shall include the number, location and timetable for construction of the additional proof-of-parking spaces. Developer shall comply with all requirements contained in the City Manager's notification. 15. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the Office District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD -a 7- 17 : Waiver from the front yard setback for parking from 35 feet to 25 feet. 16. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, hold harmless, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorney's fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release,hold harmless,defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. '/ PRAIRIEVIEW OFFICE BUILDING OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN PRAIRIEVIEW L.L.C. AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of September 16, 1997, by and between THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES,a New York corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Resolution No. 97-156 for P.U.D. Concept Review, Ordinance No. for P.U.D. District Review and Zoning District Change, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 97-157 for Preliminary Plat, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of September 16, 1997, by and between Prairieview L.L.C., a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Prairieview L.L.C.,fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the PUD Concept Review,PUD District Review and Rezoning, Site Plan Review,and Preliminary Plat identified above,thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. 4. Owner is executing this Supplement to the Developer's Agreement for the sole and express purposes of agreeing to the terms hereof and of consenting to the execution of said Developer's Agreement; but by doing so Owner does not assume any obligations of the Developer under said Developer's Agreement unless Owner proceeds with the development of the property. Owner is not obligated to develop the Property in accordance with the Developer's Agreement. In the event the Owner desires to develop the Property other than in accordance with the Developer's Agreement it must submit an application to the City in accordance with the City ordinances and regulations in effect at that time. 12_, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: September 16, 1997 SECTION: Consent DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO: -�-i/ Community Development Continue Participation in the Livable Chris Enger Communities Program David Lindahl REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt a Resolution electing to continue participation in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program (LHIA) under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. BACKGROUND: The Local Housing Incentives Account provides grant funds to affordable housing projects in cities participating in the Livable Communities program. To have access to these funds, cities each year must elect to participate in the Program. As you may recall, the recently approved Edenvale Townhome Project received a $300,000 grant through this Program. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: Resolution I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1998 WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act(Minnesota Statues Section 473.25 to 473.254)establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account,is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities;and WHEREAS,a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life-cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide;and WHEREAS,the Metropolitan Council adopted,by resolution after a public hearing,negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for each participating municipality;and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS,for calendar year 1998,a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1997,can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if:(a)the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1997; and(b)the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT City Council of the City of Eden Prairie elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 1998. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council this 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane,City Clerk dave\housing\livable.res Z DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: L' ?� F SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 97-5440 Engineering Division Permit for Watermain Crossing Twin Cities and Western Railroad Company Alan D. Gray Right-of-Way Recommended Action: Approve the permit to construct and maintain watermain crossing the Twin Cities and Western Railroad Company right-of-way on Birch Island Road. Overview: The Council has approved the plans and specifications for the construction of a segment of trunk watermain on Birch Island Road between Kurtz Lane and Edenvale Boulevard. This segment of watermain is planned for construction this fall. A permit is required from the Twin Cities and Western Railroad Company to cross their right-of-Way on Birch Island Road. The permit agreement as proposed by the railroad is typical of those used in the railroad industry for utility crossings. Financial Issues: The railroad is requiring an annual fee of$250.00. This fee would be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index. This fee will be paid annually from Trunk Utility Funds. CROSSING PERMIT NO. 438.6-960902 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the 1st day of Seotember 19 97 , by and between Twin Cities & Western Railroad Company , party of the first part, hereinafter called "Railroad", and City of Eden Prairie, 8080 Mitchell Road. Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 property of the second part, hereinafter called "Licensee". WITNESSETH: In consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained to be kept and performed by lessee, Railroad hereby leases to Lessee upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth the following described premises ("Premises") situated in the City of Eden Prairie , County of Hennepin , State of MN : Section 4 Township 116N Range 22W 1. The Railroad, for and in consideration of the payments and covenants hereinafter mentioned to be made, kept and performed by the Licensee, does hereby license and permit said Licensee to construct, install, and thereafter during the term hereof to maintain and operate under, along and across the Railroad's property in the manner and subject to the terms and conditions herein provided, a pipeline to be used only for the purpose of a domestic water pipeline not for the purpose of disposing of hazardous materials, in location or locations shown by the highlighted line upon the map attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A", and made a part hereof. 2. The said pipeline shall have an outside diameter not to exceed 28 inches. At all points where said line passes beneath the roadbed or tracks the same shall be installed and maintained at such depth that the top of said line, or any casing which may contain it, shall be not less than eight feet, measured vertically, below the base of the rails of such track and be covered by three feet of fill at ditch lines and toes of slopes. In accordance with the details as shown on the attached marked "Exhibit A":, and specifications hereto attached marked "Exhibit B", at a depth of not less than Eight (8) feet beneath the base of the rail of any railroad tracks located on said property, to be used by the Licensee exclusively for an underground domestic water pipeline subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth. 3. The Licensee shall pay the Railroad Company the sum of $250.00 ITwo Hundred Fifty & no/100) per annum, payable in advance as rental for the permission herein granted, and shall assume and pay all taxes and assessments that may be levied or assessed against the line, or against the Railroad Company's property by reason of the location of said line thereon. (e) The "base rent" for the first one (1) year period of the basic term of the agreement hereof shall be $250.00, but for each successive one (1) year period of the balance of said basic term said "base rent" shall be such sum per annum as shall be determined following a reappraisal of the leased premises at nor near the expiration of the first or any succeeding one (1) year period. The rent adjustment referred to in this paragraph shall be conducted in the following manner: The "base rent" shall hereafter be increased in each billing date of this agreement to an amount equal to the product of the "base rent" multiplied by the fraction of the "index" for the "comparison month" over the "index" for the "base month"; provided however, that in no event shall the "base rent" be less than $250.00. Z As used here in the term "base rent" shall mean $250.00. The term "index" shall mean the "all items" group of the United State City average consumer price index issued monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, or its successor. The term "comparison month" shall mean the month most recently preceding the billing date of this lease for which the "index" is available. The "base index" will be 157.4 which is the index for June 1997. The "index" will appear on the rental bill. 4. The Licensee, after first securing all necessary public authority, shall at the Licensee's sole expense install and thereafter maintain the line upon and across the Railroad Company's property and underneath any railroad tracks located thereon at the above described location, in a manner satisfactory to the Railroad Company's Director, Maintenance & Mechanical, and in strict conformity with the requirements of all laws, ordinances and orders of competent public authority now existing and future modifications thereof, so as not to endanger the safety of railroad or other operations upon said property and so as not to endanger the safety of the persons or property near or adjacent to the Railroad Company's property. 5. The Licensee shall bear the entire cost and expense incurred in connection with the construction, maintenance, renewal and removal of said line, including all cost and expense incurred by the Railroad in connection therewith for all work performed and materials used, and for supervision and inspection. All work of installation, alteration, maintenance and removal of said line within the limits of the right of way of the Railroad shall be done by the Licensee under the supervision, and to the satisfaction of the Railroad, and no work shall be done by the Licensee upon the premises of the Railroad without first notifying said Railroad of the licensee's desire so to do, provided that the Railroad may perform any work by it deemed necessary to support any of its tracks while such work is being done and any work necessary to restore the track and roadbed to their former condition, or any other work by it deemed necessary to be done upon its right of way by reason of the installation, alteration, maintenance or removal of said line, and the Licensee agrees to repay to the Railroad promptly upon the rendition of bills therefore the cost of all such work so done by it. "Cost" as used in this agreement shall mean all assignable costs, plus 10% on all labor items (including payroll taxes) to cover elements of expense not capable of exact ascertainment, and shall include charges for transportation of men and material at tariff rates store expense on material. 6. The Licensee shall be responsible for determining the location and existence of any power lines, wires, conduits, sewers, piling or other obstructions to the construction of Licensee's line and shall indemnify Railroad Company for any and all liability for damage to the foregoing power lines, wires, conduits, sewers, piling or other obstructions, if any, caused by the construction or maintenance of Licensee's conduits, sewers, pilings or other obstructions. The Licensee shall also be responsible for calling Gopher One before the project commences. 7. The Licensee shall not carry on any work in connection with the installation, maintenance, repair changing or renewal of the line underneath or in close proximity to any railroad track at the above described location before giving the Director, Maintenance & Mechanical at least three days' written notice at the office located at Glencoe, Minnesota, and not until an authorized representative of the Railroad Company shall be present to supervise same. Upon bills being rendered therefore, the Licensee shall promptly reimburse the Railroad Company for all expenses incurred by it in connection with such supervision, including all labor costs for flagmen supplied by the Railroad Company to protect railroad operations, and for the entire cost of the furnishing, installation and later removal of any temporary supports for said tracks, which said Director, Maintenance & Mechanical or his authorized representative may consider necessary while such work is in progress. 8. The Licensee at the Licensee's sole expense, whenever notified to do so, shall promptly make such repairs to or changes in the line, including change in location, as said Director, Maintenance & Mechanical or his authorized representative shall for any reason consider necessary and require. The Railroad Company shall have the right, at its election, to make emergency repairs to the line, and in such event the Licensee, upon bills being rendered therefore, will promptly reimburse the Railroad Company for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. 5 9. Maintenance and use of the line upon and across the Railroad Company's property at the above described location, however long continued, shall not vest in the Licensee any rights adverse to those of the Railroad Company. 10. The Licensee shall assume all risk of damage to or destruction of the line through any cause whatsoever while located upon and across the Railroad Company's property, and shall at all times fully indemnify the Railroad Company against all liability, claims, demands, suits, judgements, costs and expenses by reason of loss or damage to property and injury to or death of persons whatsoever or whomsoever, in any manner arising from or growing out of, directly or indirectly, wholly or in part, the installation, maintenance, repair, changing, renewal, existence or removal of the line upon, across or from the Railroad Company's property at the above described location. 11. The Railroad shall have the right at any and all times to raise or lower its grade, to make such changes in its existing track or tracks, roadbeds, structures and facilities or in the present standards thereof and to construct, maintain and operate such additional road beds, tracks, structures and facilities on said right of way and over and across said line as from time to time it may elect and may do whatever is necessary to enable it to use said railroad premises for all lawful purposes; and the Licensee agrees, at Licensee's sole cost, and within ten days after written notice from the Railroad so to do, to remove said line or make such changes in, additions to or changes in the location thereof, as may in the judgement of the Railroad be necessary to conform to the changes, alterations or new construction by the Railroad. If the Licensee shall fail to do so the Railroad may, if it so elects, in addition to any other remedy which it may have, remove said line or make such changes in, additions to or changes in the location thereof as are necessary for said purposes and the licensee agrees to pay promptly upon rendition of bill the cost thereof. Provided, that the Railroad may in any event as its election do any of such work required to be done upon its right of way without notice and for all such work the Licensee like wise agrees to pay promptly upon rendition of bill the cost thereof. All the terms, conditions and stipulations herein expressed with reference to the construction, maintenance repair, renewal or removal of said line in the location above described shall apply to the same as relocated, changed or modified within the contemplation of this section. 12. As a material consideration to the Railroad for entering into this agreement, and without which the Railroad would not enter into same, the Licensee agrees to, and hereby does, release, indemnify and save harmless the Railroad, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage, expense, actions and claims for personal injuries including death, regardless of cause, suffered by any person whomsoever while upon the Railroad's premises in connection with the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, renewal or removal of said line, or for personal injuries, including death, suffered by any person whomsoever for or arising out of damage to or destruction of property of any party whomsoever, including the parties hereto, in any manner arising out of or caused or contributes to the existence, presence, construction, maintenance, condition, operations, repair, renewal, use or removal of said line. 13. The waiver by the Railroad Company of a breach by the Licensee of any provision hereof, shall be limited to the act or omission constituting such breach, and shall not constitute a continuing or permanent waiver. 14. This agreement or the permission herein granted shall not be assigned or transferred by the Licensee in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise, without the written consent of the Railroad Company. Subject thereto, this agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors, assigns and legal representatives of the respective parties. 15. The said line shall be marked not less than every 400 yards, when paralleling the railroad, with Licensee's Company markings and with correct color codes and markings at both ends of line where it traverses the Railroad. Markings shall not be closer than 12 feet to field side of rail. 16. If natural vegetation does not re-grow within 6 months of the completed line project, Licensee shall seed the affected area until the vegetation growth is satisfactory to the Railroad. "i 17. Licensee shall be responsible for clean-up and soil testing as required by the Railroad and The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and any other governing agencies or bodies. 18. The Licensee shall, at its sole cost, procure and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement, comprehensive general liability insurance, including contractual coverage insuring Licensee's obligations under this agreement, with the Railroad exclusion deleted, covering bodily injury and property damage with limits of no less than $500,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 annual aggregate. The policy shall be endorsed to name Railroad as an additional insured and to provide thirty (30) days notice to Railroad prior to termination or material modification of the policy. Lessee shall provide Railroad with a certificate of insurance annually. 19. This agreement shall continue in effect until terminated by either party upon sixty day's written notice to the other party. Any notice given by the Railroad Company hereunder shall be good if deposited in a United States Post Office, certified mail, addressed to the Licensee at the Licensee's last known address. When so terminated, the Railroad Company shall make proportionate refund to the Licensee of rental that shall have been paid in advance after deduction of any amounts payable by the Licensee hereunder. 20. The Licensee at the Licensee's sole expense, within one year from the date of service of notice of termination as above provided, shall take up and remove said line from the Railroad Company's property at the above described location and restore said property to a condition satisfactory to said Director, Maintenance & Mechanical. Failure on the part of the Licensee to do so shall constitute an abandonment of the line by the Licensee, and the Railroad Company shall have the right to remove the whole or any part of the line from said property and perform said work of restoration, and in either event the Licensee, upon a bill being rendered therefore, shall promptly reimburse the Railroad Company for all expenses incurred in connection therewith, plus fifteen percent. 21. The Railroad Company shall not be required to assume any portion of the cost of the construction of said line or future maintenance thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be duty executed as of the day and year first above written. TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY By: William F. Drusch, President Date: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: Date: By: Date: .V{ I I a -- - -- - -- ° — •� �. \ •.) ,.\. \ .. r /' ` 1.‘') .1.3 :, // \ `\\\ \�'M1 J :• . --_ W ~ \'\\\ .-. Yz V 1 \‘''',' • \ `o c qk �` \\� \ 60 40 / of °�° (a g 44 . • \ • • I:1i: W :7: i:;:k \ J W . r_• ®,,..... ,a- N a - . LI., ' Z- ;18:r..; ,:-..:1..:•: 7:.:i . '\ it ; \ ...\\-- :, :, . .. ,, •••• 400.) illa) left,; • i 4r 1 r , `t' \. `= .:.! _s2aOS'I99Z- \ i s jf \ .4. ki''‘..._,” \ -r.--% -- \..:' c c11 r Pr-_ `_fit n 0 a- m A. r • .- f t , Al 11 ^ "-of. %�' o' to •' V� ,"� ' t ,N,• ...*is • , f lk\�_� r� 1 ^ • \a `, `�� QG pNti �'`,'�!'!�. . ,:�` .'• k..' a 'ST' \' too. .Lf _ \, ,.. + , \ ' . \ t 1, j p g t .A• . - 4. � R` • d mot \ i \ fi.:.,/ d„ S. • ;, Y ff' . `ll .s.ot.z°I rA . ,Mt I., I f to /� r W APPLICATION FOR DYING PIPELINE ON TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD Date July 31 , 1997 1. At what city or village is permit desired? Eden Prairie 2. Full name and address of applicant. City of Eden Prairie. 8080 Mitchell Road. Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 3. It applicant is a corporation in what state is -t incorporated? N/A 4. Product to be handled in pipeline. Domestic water. 5. Pipe Data 16" DIP in a. outside diameter 28° casing act.:al working pressure 75 Psi b. inside diameter 2 7" g. type of joint welded c. pipe material steel h. coating no d. specifications i. method of installation lacking and grade ASTht A-53. Grade B 1 . will cathodic protection be provided? no e. wall t -ckness 0 500"thickness 6. a. Depth of pipe under ,.rack (top cf tie to bottom of casing) 10 ft. b. Angle of crossing_ 65° -- 7. :f pipe is cc be place longitudinally with track. give a. _..cation of pipe in _elation to --.._erline of nearest track. b. depth of coverage rc�_� line to too of ripe) = S. If pipe is to be placed under track, give a. location of pi;e measured from centari:.ne of nearest roadway on road centerline _. location of pipe measured from a fixed railroad fixture, such as a culvert N/A 9. If inataila:ion is to be by lacking or boring method give location of jacking and is a. depth 9 ft. and 11 ft. h. distance facing wall of pit to center _e of nearest track (measured normal) 25 ft. (min 10. Reference plans (to he forwarded with orig_.al application) a. drawing number 10417.01 b. prepared by Rieke Carroll Mu11Pr Acsnriatac rnr 11. Please provide the section 4 Tc:.nsn'p 116N Range 22W Applicant agrees that if installation requires any or all of the following work; bridging. protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flagging, engineering and/or surervision; such work is to be performed by railway employees and the cost borne by Applicant. RETURN INFOR:fA ION TO: TWIN CITIES 4 WESTERN RAILROAD ATTN: )OLLI SC){Z R 2925 12TH STREET FAST GLENCOE, mN 55336 (612) 864-7230 FAX (612) 864-7220 7 DATE: 09/16/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NOT/ SECTION: Consent Calendar J DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5350 Public Works Change Order No. 2 for Water Treatment Plant Eugene A. Dietz Requested Action: Approve Change Order No. 2 for the Water Treatment Plant Expansion project in the amount of$39,444. Background: This change order is a compilation of 23 adjustments to the contract that range from deduct - no change - increase in price. Six of the items result in no change to the contract price, four reduce contract price and the remaining thirteen increase the contract cost with a net result that increases the total project by $39,444. Attached is a summary of the changes along with the letter from Black & Veatch to the Director of Public Works that explains the reasons for these modifications. The combination of Change Order No. 1 and Change Order No. 2 increases the contract by $74,838, or 0.4% increase in contract price. The specification for this project requires substantial completion by April, 1998. However, the contractor, Knutson Construction Company, anticipates an early substantial completion in December of this year. With this time frame in mind, we would anticipate two additional changes orders for the project -- one in approximately December and a final change order somewhere near final completion in April, 1998. Financial Implications: At this time, total change orders for the project are anticipated to fall in the range of 1-2% and will be included in the overall financing package for the project. BLACK & VEATCH..P 8400 Ward Parkway, P.O. Box No. 8405, Kansas City, Missouri 64114, (913)458-2000 Eden Prairie, Minnesota B&V Project 26014.400 Water Treatment Plant Improvements B&V File G-1.0 September 5, 1997 Mr. Gene Dietz Director of Public Works City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Subject: Change Order No. 2 Dear Gene: Enclosed are four copies of Change Order No. 2 for the Water Treatment Plant Improvements project. The following is a brief description of each item included in the change order: Sanitary Sewer Yard Piping Modifications. Based on the Department of Health's requirement that no sanitary sewer manhole be installed within 50 feet of a reservoir, two manholes were deleted and the sanitary sewer piping was modified to provide the necessary separation distance. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $1,572. Sprinkler Water Containment. Based on the requirements of the building code review, a containment structure directly under the paint storage room floor was constructed to contain sprinkler water in the event that the fire suppression system is activated. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $4,070. Elimination of the Sump at the Filter Influent Vault. As requested by the plant staff, the existing vault was filled with concrete to eliminate the need for them to enter a confined space to maintain a sump pump. The sump pump and electrical circuits were also removed. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $4,119. Relocate Control Panel for LF-1. As requested by the plant staff, the control panel for Lime Feeder No. 1 was relocated from the west side to the east side of the feeder for easier access. This modification resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $1,285. z Page 2 Mr. Gene Dietz B&V Project 26014.400 September 5, 1997 Chlorine Storage Room Door. Due to the relationship between the structural beam adjacent to Door D143 and the door opening of the chlorine storage room, there was insufficient space for the rolling. steel door hood. Therefore, the rolling steel door will be replaced with a swinging hollow metal door. This modification resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $4,305. Secondary Basin No. 4 Effluent Collection Box. As requested by the plant staff, the Secondary Basin No. 4 effluent collection box was filled with self leveling lean concrete from the basin floor to the invert of the filter influent piping to prevent the deposition of solids and the potential for water quality problems. This modification resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $2,552. Locksets for Doors 0115, D117, and D225. As requested by the plant staff, doors D115, D117, and D225 will be revised from latchsets to locksets. This modification resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $224. Modifications to Public Education Spaces. As requested by the City, modifications to the public education spaces included: a. Reducing the terrazzo limits. b. Creating a coat closet. c. Deleting carpet in Rooms 102, 103, and 104. d. Installing hot/cold water, natural gas, and electrical outlets/conduit to the eight lab tables. e. Adding two floor drains. f. Adding a hose reel in Room 105. g. Adding a conduit which housed two 120V circuits for future use in the display area in Room 104. h. Adding receptacles and a spare 2 inch conduit for future computer needs in Room 104. i . Adding an emergency shower and emergency eye wash. j . Revising ductwork in Room 114 to accommodate the coat closet modifications. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $8,317. 8 Inch Water Main Offset. Upon excavation for the new storm sewer near the northeast corner of the new reservoir, it was determined that the portion of existing 8 inch water main which serves the Public Works building would have to be lowered to provide separation from the sewer piping as required by the Department of Health. This modification resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $5,514. 3 Page 3 Mr. Gene Dietz B&V Project 26014.400 September 5, 1997 Electrical Demolition and Valve Rewiring. Upon removing the existing walls on the southwest and east sides of Primary and Secondary Basin No. 4, it was determined that various electrical devices would be disconnected or removed on a time and material basis. In addition, the relocated plug valves in the existing sludge pit were rewired. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $846. Electrical Demolition. Upon removing the existing filter gallery walls at the operating floor level for expansion into the new filter gallery, it was determined that various electrical devices needed to be relocated on a time and materials basis. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $2,367. Emergency Exit Signs. Since the general public will be frequently visiting this plant, twenty-five emergency exits signs were added. These modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $8,087. Roof Drain Extensions. The City and the Contractor agreed to split the total cost of materials, tax, labor, and freight for roof drain and overflow roof drain extensions. This modifications resulted in an increase to the Contract Price of $3,835. Delete Rubber Tile Flooring. The rubber tile flooring in Rooms 105, 110, 118, 213, 215, 216, and 222 will be replaced with painted concrete and the rubber tile flooring in Rooms 225 and 226 will be replaced with a concrete sealer. These modifications resulted in a deduct to the Contract Price of $3,858. Reduce Conduit Size. The size of the conduit for the flagpole lighting circuit was reduced from 2 inch to 1 inch which resulted in a deduct to the Contract Price of $250. Deletion of 8 Inch Piping Between FW-8 & FW-9. Based on the current Department of Transportation construction drawings for TH-212, the extension of the existing 8 inch fire water supply from FW-8 to FW-9 will not be necessary. This resulted in a deduct to the Contract Price of $1,777. Outdoor J-Box. The electrical handhole located near the southwest side of the administration area with an outdoor J-box. In addition, the following modifications have no impact on the Contract Price or Time: a. In order to comply with the National Electric Code, the 120V standard receptacles in the elevator pits and passenger and freight elevator equipment rooms will be replaced by ground fault interrupter receptacles. L/ Page 4 Mr. Gene Dietz B&V Project 26014.400 September 5, 1997 b. The chlorine feeder piping was modified to permit greater flexibility. c. The phosphate metering pump discharge piping was modified so that each filter influent pipe can be fed independently by dedicated metering pumps. d. The existing fluoride system will remain unmodified. The proposed changes will not be made. e. In order to maintain uniformity among plant valves, the 1 1/2 shut off valves installed in the sludge piping at the Thickening Basin will be revised from a globe valve to a ball valve with an electric actuator. f. As proposed by the Contractor and accepted by the plant staff for uniformity with existing valves, the equipment manufacturer for the eccentric plug valves shall be changed from Milliken (as listed in the Questionnaire) to DeZurik. We have evaluated the proposed changes and the associated costs and they appear to be reasonable. Therefore, we recommend that Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $39,444.00 be submitted to the City Council for approval . If the change order is acceptable, Knutson's representative can come by your office to sign the change order for submittal to the City Council . Once fully executed, please return three signed copies. We will forward two copies to Knutson for their files and for their Surety. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, BLACK & VEATCH David J. Carlson enclosures cc: Ed Sorensen Todd Schilling 1' CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 94-5350 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 A. SCOPE This Change Order No. 2 covers the following items: 1. Sanitary Sewer Yard Piping Modifications Delete manholes SS-5 and SS-6 and realign the invert elevations of the 4 and 6 inch diameter sanitary sewer piping as indicated in RFP-1.02 dated September 24, 1996. Add $1,572.00 2. Sprinkler Water Containment Construct a containment structure directly under the paint storage room floor (Room 138)to contain sprinkler water in the event that the fire suppression system is activated. Additional reinforced concrete, collection channels, and a manhole shall be installed in accordance with RFP-2.02 dated October 18, 1996. Add $4,070.00 3. Elimination Of The Sump At The Filter Influent Vault The existing sump pump, piping, and electrical wiring located within the existing vault shall be removed and the vault filled with concrete in accordance with RFP-3.03 dated January 7, 1997. Add $4,119.00 4. Relocate Control Panel for LF-1 Relocate the control panel for the existing lime feeder (LF- 1) from the west side to the east side of the feeder for easier access. Add $1,285.00 1 5. Chlorine Storage Room Door Replace the rolling steel door with a swinging hollow metal door in accordance with RFP-6.03 dated March 4, 1997. The new swinging hollow metal door shall comply with the requirements of Section 08110 and shall include hardware which complies with Section 08700 and the hardware listed in RFP-6.03 dated March 4, 1997. The chlorine monorail swingout shall be deleted and the top elevation of the chlorine monorail shall be 871.00. The chlorine monorail support (Detail K, SH 86) shall be modified accordingly. Add $4,305.00 6. Secondary Basin No. 4 Effluent Collection Box The Secondary Basin No. 4 effluent collection box shall be filled with self leveling lean concrete in accordance with RFP-15 dated March 21, 1997. Add $2,552.00 7. Locksets for Doors D115, D117, & D225 Doors D115, D117, and D225 shall be revised from latchsets to locksets in accordance with RFP-16 dated March 21, 1997. Add $224.00 8. Modifications to Public Education Spaces Modifications shall be made to Rooms 102, 103, 104, 105,107, 108, 109, 114, and 115 in accordance with RFP-18 dated April 24, 1997 and the correction letter dated April 29, 1997. Add $8,317.00 9. 8 Inch Water Main Offset The portion of 8 inch water main which serves the Public Works building shall be rerouted in accordance with COR-6 dated April 2, 1997. Add $5,514.00 2 10. Electrical Demolition & Valve ReWiring Remove, disconnect, investigate, or repair existing electrical circuits/equipment in accordance with COR-8 dated June 18, 1997. In addition, the relocated plug valves in the existing sludge pit shall be rewired in accordance with COR-8. Add $846.00 11. Electrical Demolition Relocate existing electrical circuits/equipment located at the interface between the existing filter gallery and the new filter gallery in accordance with COR-13 dated May 6, 1997. Add $2,367.00 12. Emergency Exit Signs Install 25 emergency exit signs to indicate the direction of egress. The emergency exit signs shall be manufactured by "Lithonia Lighting" in accordance with RFP-24 dated July 8, 1997. Add 8,087.00 13. Roof Drain Extensions Extensions shall be added to the roof drains due to the thickness of the roof insulation. Add 3,835.00 14. Delete Rubber Tile Flooring Replace the rubber tile flooring in Rooms 105, 110, 118, 213, 215, 216, 222, 225, and 226 in accordance with RFP-19 dated May 21, 1997. Deduct $3,858.00 15. Reduce Conduit Size Reduce the size of the conduit for the flagpole lighting circuit from 2 inch to 1 inch. Deduct $250.00 3 AiMOMMOMER 16. Deletion of 8 Inch Piping Between FW-8 & FW-9 Delete the portion of 8 inch fire water piping between designations FW-8 and FW-9 in accordance with RFP-1.07 dated September 24, 1997. Deduct $1,777.00 17. Outdoor J-Box Replace the electrical handhole located near the southwest side of the administration area with an outdoor J-box. Deduct $1,764.00 18. Elevator Receptacles Replace the 120V standard receptacles in the elevator pits and the passenger and freight elevator equipment rooms with ground fault interrupter receptacles as specified in Section 16050 in accordance with RFP-3.01 dated January 7, 1997. No Change 19. Chlorine Feeder Flexibility Revise the chlorine feeder piping in accordance with RFP-4.01 dated March 3, 1997 to permit greater flexibility in which feeder can feed to which feed point. No Change 20. Phosphate Feed Discharge Revise the phosphate metering pump discharge piping in accordance with RFP-4.02 dated March 3, 1997 so that each filter influent pipe can be fed independently by dedicated metering pumps. No Change 4 9 21. Existing Fluoride System To Remain The existing fluoride system shall remain in service and the changes indicated in the original contract are not to be made. No Change 22. 1 1/2 Inch Shut-Off Valve Revise the 1 1/2 inch shut-off valve installed in the sludge drain piping at the Thickening Basin from a globe valve to a ball valve in accordance with RFP-6.01 dated March 4, 1997. No Change 23. Eccentric Plug Valves The equipment manufacturer for the eccentric plug valves shall be changed from Milliken to DeZurik. No Change B. EFFECT ON CONTRACT AMOUNT As a result of this Change Order No. 2, the contract amount will be increased by $39,444.00. C. EFFECT ON CONTRACT TIME As a result of this Change Order No. 2, the contract time shall remain unchanged. D. OTHER CONTRACT PROVISIONS Except as otherwise provided herein, it is understood and agreed that all other provisions of the contract remain unchanged. The Contractor hereby waives and releases all claims, known or unknown, for costs (whether direct or indirect) , delays, impacts, escalation, subcontractor or supplier costs, or any other damages or time extensions whatsoever, which could have been claimed or associated with the work as described in Paragraph A above. 5 E. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT AMOUNT CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDERS ADJUSTMENT Original Contract $20,204,000.00 Change Order No. 1 $ 35,394.00 Change Order No. 2 $ 39,444.00 Adjusted Contract Amount $20,278,838.00 F. ACCEPTANCE The change and conditions set forth in the above Change Order No. 2 are hereby accepted. This Change Order No. 2 will be effective on OWNER:City of Eden Prairie. CONTRACTOR: Knutson Minnesota Construction Company By: By: Dr. Jean L. Harris Title: Mayor Title: By: Carl J. Jullie Title: City Manager 6 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: eer1 SECTION: Consent Calendar Sept. 16, 1997 prairie DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ordinance amending Chapter 5 ITEM NO. Finance Other Business Licensing IV• Background: Sections 5.30, 5.33, 5.34, 5.41, 5.42, and 5.43 are being amended to reflect current terminology used by insurance companies in reference to liability limits. The amount of coverage required has been increased from $300,000 to $500,000 combined single limit, which in most cases is less than what most contractors carry. Section 5.43, Subd. 3, has been amended to increase the bond requirement from $2000 to $5000 for heating and ventilating contractors. Section 5.33, Subd. 3. A. is being repealed since the Subparagraph A in Subdivision 1 to which this refers was repealed in 1992. Action/Direction: Recommend approval of first reading September 16, 1997 Page 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.30, SUBD. 3, SECTION 5.33, SUBD. 3. B, SECTION 5.34, SUBD. 3, SECTION 5.41, SUBD. 4, SECTION 5.42, SUBD. 3, SECTION 5.43, SUBD. 2 AND SUBD. 3, LISTING INSURANCE AND BOND REQUIREMENTS RESPECTIVELY; REPEALING SECTION 5.33, SUBD. 3.A., LISTING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS; AND ADOPTING CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 5.99 WHICH AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAINS PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 5.30, Subd. 3, is amended as follows: Subd. 3. Insurance Required. If the application is for amusements rides, proof of liability insurance with limits of bodily injury/property damage combined single limit of $500,000.00 shall be provided. Section 2. City Code Section 5.33, Subd. 3. B, is amended as follows: Subd. 3. Insurance Required. B. To perform work defined in Subdivision 1, but limited to Subparagraph B thereunder: proof of liability insurance with limits of bodily injury/property damage combined single limit of$500,000.00 shall be provided. Section 3. City Code Section 5.34, Subd. 3, is amended as follows: Subd. 3. Insurance Required. Proof of liability insurance with limits of bodily injury/property damage combined single limit of$500,000.00 shall be provided. Section 4. City Code Section 5.41, Subd. 4, is amended as follows: Subd. 4. Liability Insurance. Proof of liability insurance with limits of bodily injury/property damage combined single limit of$500,000.00 shall be provided. Section 5. City Code Section 5.42, Subd. 3, is amended as follows: Subd. 3. Insurance Required. Proof of liability insurance with limits of bodily injury/property damage combined single limit of$500,000.00 shall be provided. 2 Section 6. City Code Section 5.43, Subd. 2, is amended as follows: Subd. 2. Insurance Required. Proof of liability insurance with limits of bodily injury/property damage combined single limit of$500,000.00 shall be provided. Section 7. City Code Section 5.43, Subd. 3, is amended as follows: Subd. 3. Bond Required. Every applicant for a heating and ventilation license shall file with his application a continuous bond in favor of the City and persons injured in the amount of $5,000.00, conditioned that the licensee, in all material and equipment by him furnished and in all work by him done and performed installing, altering, reconstructing or repairing any heating, ventilating, comfort cooling or refrigeration equipment, will strictly conform to the provisions of the City Code relating thereto. The bond shall apply to all work to be done under the license during the period from the date of issuance to the date of expiration of the license. The bond form shall be provided by the City to the applicant. Section 8. City Code Section 5.33, Subd. 3.A. is repealed. Section 9. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 5.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 10. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the day of , 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the day of , 1997. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the day of , 1997. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9-16-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.A. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger PRAIRIE LAKES CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 2 Michael D.Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing 2. Approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 13.07 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 13.07 acres; 3. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 13.07 acres; and 4. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: The site is currently guided and zoned office according to a plan approved in 1978 . The approved plan is a 80 foot tall 200,000 square foot office building. The existing building is 80 feet tall and 137,400 square feet. United Properties wants to build a second office building of 72,000 square feet. The building is 51 feet tall. The site plan shows the construction of 72,000 square foot building. The base area ratio for the proposed and existing building is .08. The City code permits up to a .30 base area ratio. The floor area ratio is .36. The City code permits up to a .50 floor area ratio. The building meets the setback requirements of the office zoning district. The building meets the 200 feet shoreland setback. The building uses the same exterior materials as the existing building. The amount of parking required is 288 spaces. The plan meets this requirement. Parking meets setbacks and the 100 foot shoreland setback. Planning Commission Recommendation At the August 25, 1997 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project subject to additional landscaping on the north side of the proposed building and along the south property line of the 1 Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution 2. Staff Report dated August 22, 1997 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 1997 PRAIRIE LAKES CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 2 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVIEW OF PRAIRIE LAKES CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 2 FOR UNITED PROPERTIES WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Prairie Lakes Corporate Center Phase 2 PUD Concept by United Properties and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 16, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Prairie Lakes Corporate Center Phase 2, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 9, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 25, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A Prairie Lakes Corporate Center Phase 2 Legal Description: Land Description: Lot 3, Block 1, Prairie Lakes Business Park, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Title in and for said County. Together with a perpetual exclusive easement benefitting said Lot 3, Block 1, Prairie Lakes Business Park, for vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress over and across the rear property described as follows, to wit: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, said Prairie Lakes Business Park, lying Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence South 08 degrees 57 minutes 47 seconds West, basis for bearings is said Prairie Lakes Business Park, 150.00 feet along the Easterly line of said Lot 2 to the point of beginning of the lines to be described; thence south 28 degrees 40 minutes 16 seconds West, 71.17 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 23 seconds West, 197.70 feet; thence south 13 degrees 13 minutes 33 seconds West, 56.56 feet; thence South 32 degrees 31 minutes 23 seconds West, 29.74 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: August 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Prairie Lakes Corporate Center Phase 2 APPLICANT: United Properties OWNER: Prairie Lakes Limited Partnership LOCATION: Prairie Lakes Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 13.07 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 13.07 acres 3. Zoning District Amendment in the Office District on 13.07 acres 4. Site Plan Review on 13.07 acres. Staff Report Prairie Lakes Office Building August 22, 1997 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided and zoned office according to a plan approved in 1978 . The approved plan is a 80 foot tall 200,000 square foot office building. The existing building is 80 feet tall and 137,400 square feet. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT United Properties wants to build a second office building of 72,000 square feet. The building is 51 feet tall. SITE PLAN,COMMERCIAL, OFFICE,AND INDUSTRIAL The site plan shows the construction of 72,000 square foot building. The base area ratio for the proposed and existing building is .08. The City code permits up to a .30 base area ratio. The floor area ratio is .36. The City code permits up to a .50 floor area ratio. The building meets the setback requirements of the office zoning district. The building meets the 200 feet shoreland setback. The amount of parking required is 288 spaces. The plan meets this requirement. Parking meets setbacks and the 100 foot shoreland setback. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The project requires a building height waiver from 30 to 51 feet. The project requires an impervious surface waiver from 30 - 60%. The building height waiver is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The building is shorter than the existing building. 2. Most of the building is screened from the lake by natural vegetation. The impervious surface waiver is reasonable since the total land within 1,000 feet of the lake meets the 30%requirement. 2 Staff Report Prairie Lakes Office Building August 22, 1997 GRADING AND TREE LOSS There are 5 maple trees (62 caliper inches) on the property. Tree loss is 62 inches. The tree replacement required is 82 caliper inches. ARCHITECTURE The buildings meet the exterior material requirements of the office zoning district for face brick and glass. The exterior materials are identical to the existing building. Mechanical equipment will be screened by penthouse. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches according to building size, tree replacement, screening of parking, and screening of loading. The amount of caliper inches required is 225 inches. The plan meets this requirement. The amount of tree replacement required is 82 inches. The landscape plan should be revised to include 82 inches of tree replacement. Parking and loading is screened by plantings. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water is available on site. Water drains to an existing treatment pond on site. CONCLUSION The Planning Commission should decide if the proposed amendment to the approved plan is acceptable. If the answer is yes,then one option would be to recommend approval of the plan as submitted. Reasons to approve the plan are: 1. The building height is shorter than the existing building. 2. The total building exposure to the lake is similar to the approve plan. 3. The building materials are the same as the existing building. 4. The plan meets shoreland structure and parking setbacks. 5. The plan meets water quality standards. 3 Staff Report Prairie Lakes Office Building August 22, 1997 6. Total traffic generation for existing PUD (80 acres) is less than what was planned in 1978. The existing roads were designed and built based on 1,200,000 square feet office and 200,000 square feet of commercial for the 1978 PUD. The PUD was amended in 1994, which converted office to residential. Residential uses generate less traffic. If the Planning Commission decides that the proposed amendment to the approved plan is not acceptable, then one option would be to recommend plan changes for the following reasons. 1. The proposed plan is 9,867 square feet larger than the approved plan. 2. The proposed plan has less open space than the approved plan. 3. Traffic generation on this site is higher than the approved plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Alternative One If the Planning Commission is comfortable with the plan as proposed,then one option would be to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District, and Site Plan Review, based on plans dated August 22, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated August 22, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Modify the landscape plan to add 82 caliper inches. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: 4 9 Staff Report Prairie Lakes Office Building August 22, 1997 A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 4. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 5. The following waivers from the City code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the Office Zoning District: A. Building height from 30 to 51 feet. B. Impervious surface from 30% - 60%. Alternative Two If the Planning Commission is not comfortable with the plan as proposed, then one option would be to recommend that the building size be reduced for the following reasons. 1. The proposed plan is 9,867 square feet larger than the approved plan. 2. The proposed plan has less open space than the approved plan. 3. Traffic generation on this site is higher than the approved plan. Staff recommends Alternative Two. 5 IV 4. ' I Y - Y.Y .01. 4. • \O`` I . '' \ 4 \x,'\\\ ,/,,\ .._ \I / ( \ \ \ .. _.. 1 ,,,\, \\,,,, . _ ... ,,,.. ::::, ... _,,, . vc 4 4 4 4 1 ..., ( . \ me r . ,, , , ,,,,, . .. __, „,.. ,,,_ _4 f `' A - ••. I t _ .\-1 , \\ l''' ...,11z.......0011":4;:r .,:;.,::::--7--.7 _.-----''/7 ,/,,,, —\\,\ '' ' // / I .\ ,i..„It•i.''. r �... { �'Ifo slIP;� '� `ter \ � .- \� �.� A��n � � s \l •t1r` iligi1.44: ...!:VI r� U . r.f. �_. + r e IIIIIP/-- it's:;*.e, __V:Sitrair Ii%‘ ‘'riillir.1,. .__, . ''' ".VP .YNIA ope„ c0 ..m . ..;--., ';��w'" 'k m ( -+ j .ram , : ( t'C'T ', • '.°"MakIt'.1 . * (Pt\i-1\'''" 0j:r25:4.5°' '', \ lion.11:k40. iiper. eat, ; \ I W./,-.4..ro r.::4r.1A1t*°%i.),t A,T'1.o.0w L' L. ' ,'' - y`' '-`ice /sc•a: -t` `\ i, 10t0- \N ,_ l i por 00.000011i141kt0.3,1 4 V%,,...,S..:\',- _-,?=-1S1-:1-0.71 k ' \ ��..t:-mo0friN: , -_>! ' Parking Lo r 1�.\vJ. �\ ' _al:,' 7� Retention Pond y V\ v • dV .. lib 1ti :=,, A\ rQ . i ----- . '- - - .*le - ,r T\'11\,'N s4lroiref, \, A -.7,," ,,...:".„.....t...:,1 ty• .0. . k , \ ,L.‘,..‘ N".- \\\4•14 1. -.,. 1.1 i t, r_;,,,,,, z _-.T„,..mitilifirifilatT'or 441, , 4ilk.:- =.......-------,..„---7/ 0,17.40,., . ...., � R dway Ed9g - olik•• o i. �ee.�U 40 _ �',`'fly\ �\lir. Iilt / �\ i , late �-. ' j, t7 .' -• _.< ' ,11 ./'e ) / / ,47, 4......pn...,*:.-t„:., I .• __--1--- ---- 11 ,i4,(,-i.. /-',,/ . Arek l'141*, - nit ...,:// ___-----,,,,:- , • - I s.!►� 1.--- L. 1:111 , - -- f� - \�� _ \ =i � \ `\ � \ ENO-"\ , \-----\+-' , - , \\\ ;\ al" /l ' I i ( / I ( = ----- ' � 1 50 ' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 4 B. PRAIRIE LAKES CORPORATE CENTER PHASE 2 by United Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 13.07 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review on 13.07 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 13.07 acres and Site Plan Review on 13.07 acres. Location: Prairie Lakes Drive. Brian Carey with United Properties reviewed the proposal to construct a second office building on the site and renovate the existing building. They are willing to proceed with either a 72,000 square foot building or the 62,000 square foot building recommended by staff. The 72,000 square foot building is entirely reasonable because there is a fairly small impact on the site. The traffic levels have been substantially mitigated and the property is specifically zoned and guided for this use. If the City keeps this type of development closer to the freeways there will be less impact on City roadways and into the community itself. He reviewed the landscape plan and the building design. Greg Bennet from Small, Reynolds, Stuart and Stuart Architects, described the proposed building which is a three-story building which would use the existing curb cuts to gain access. They will use natural tree lines and topography to locate the building and connect the two buildings together. He discussed the landscaping which would be done to enhance the site and screen the parking from adjacent properties. He described the building materials which they propose to use and the way they intend to connect the two buildings together and reinforce the continuity on the site. Wissner asked if it would be possible to match the existing building and Bennett responded that it would be complimentary and they will try to match it as closely as possible,but since the original building is over twenty years old,it could be difficult to get an exact match in materials. Ismail asked about the connection between the two buildings and Bennett outlined the area where they would be connected on the first level. Clinton asked what a Class A building was and Carey responded that in the 1980's the Carlson Center set the trend for what they call the Class A Development which is usually an all glass exterior with some design elements and amenities which include underground, heated parking and an on-site food service. Franzen gave the staff report and stated that staff recommended that the building size be reduced based on recent experience with similar requests in the past. These include increased tree loss. The staff recommended approval of Alternative 2 which is the smaller building. Ismail asked what would happen if the building were reduced in size and Franzen responded that the amount of site drain age would be reduced and the amount of parking required would also be less. Ismail stated he was in favor of reducing the size of the building. Sandstad discussed the traffic which would be generated from the development and noted that the surrounding freeways would be able to handle it adequately. Carey PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 5 stated the open space on the site remains very substantial and there would about 4,000 square feet of hard surface coverage which would be needed with the larger building which would not have a significant impact. The Public Hearing was opened. Tom Mingle, 10940 Kiawah Drive, asked what the current occupancy rate of the existing building was and what the sight lines for the new building would be. He could see that there was a need for more office space on the other side of the lake if the GE Capital office building was approved. Carey responded the occupancy rate has been good with very little vacancy. He inquired if they added larger trees to the landscape plan it might improve the sight lines from adjacent properties. Doug Waterman, 10698 Kiawah Drive,noted there was significant traffic on Prairie Center Drive and this needed to be taken into account when making decisions which would affect the traffic in this vicinity. Sandstad stated he was comfortable with the slightly larger building because the traffic was not an issue and the open space could be ameliorated by planting some slightly larger trees. Franzen commented that the three-story building would have a smaller building footprint and would leave more green space and the parking area would be smaller. Wissner concurred with Sandstad. Foote inquired if the 62,000 square foot building would have a larger footprint than the 72,000 square foot building. Carey responded they need to have a building footprint which is functional and they would need to make the 62,000 square foot building a two-story building with a larger footprint. Foote stated he would prefer to see the three-story building because it would be more in keeping with what is already on the site. Alexander stated she felt the three-story building was more cohesive and fit into the design elements better than the two-story building. Ismail stated he had preferred the smaller building but with what he has seen and heard regarding the impacts of the smaller building,he felt that the larger building was more in keeping with what is already there. Foote asked if there was room to do some significant planting and Franzen responded that adding more conifers to reduce the visual impact from the south and screen the building from the lake may be the best choice. Carey stated they did not have a specific number of trees in mind,but they were willing to work with staff to arrive at an appropriate number and size to provide the screening and improve the landscaping on the site. Franzen stated that staff would look at more recent office projects and if the landscape plan did not meet current ordinance requirements they would bring it up to those standards. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner to recommend approval of the request of United Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 13.07 I2j PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 5 stated the open space on the site remains very substantial and there would about 4,000 square feet of hard surface coverage which would be needed with the larger building which would not have a significant impact. The Public Hearing was opened. Tom Klingle, 10940 Kiawah Drive, asked what the current occupancy rate of the existing building was and what the sight lines for the new building would be. He could see that there was a need for more office space on the other side of the lake if the GE Capital office building was approved. Carey responded the occupancy rate has been good with very little vacancy. He inquired if they added larger trees to the landscape plan it might improve the sight lines from adjacent properties. Doug Waterman, 10698 Kiawah Drive,noted there was significant traffic on Prairie Center Drive and this needed to be taken into account when making decisions which would affect the traffic in this vicinity. Sandstad stated he was comfortable with the slightly larger building because the traffic was not an issue and the open space could be ameliorated by planting some slightly larger trees. Franzen commented that the three-story building would have a smaller building footprint and would leave more green space and the parking area would be smaller. Wissner concurred with Sandstad. Foote inquired if the 62,000 square foot building would have a larger footprint than the 72,000 square foot building. Carey responded they need to have a building footprint which is functional and they would need to make the 62,000 square foot building a two-story building with a larger footprint. Foote stated he would prefer to see the three-story building because it would be more in keeping with what is already on the site. Alexander stated she felt the three- story building was more cohesive and fit into the design elements better than the two-story building. Ismail stated he had preferred the smaller building but with what he has seen and heard regarding the impacts of the smaller building,he felt that the larger building was more in keeping with what is already there. Foote asked if there was room to do some significant planting and Franzen responded that adding more conifers to reduce the visual impact from the south and screen the building from the lake may be the best choice. Carey stated they did not have a specific number of trees in mind,but they were willing to work with staff to arrive at an appropriate number and size to provide the screening and improve the landscaping on the site. Franzen stated that staff would look at more recent office projects and if the landscape plan did not meet current ordinance requirements they would bring it up to those standards. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Sandstad moved,seconded by Wissner to recommend approval of the request of United Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 13.07 acres,PUD District Review on 13.07 acres, and Site Plan Review on 13.07 acres with Alternative 1 with the promise of additional plantings as agreed to by staff,based on plans dated August 22, 1997 and subject to the recommendations on the Staff Report dated August 22, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. iy EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9-16-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.B. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES Michael D.Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 60.29 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 60.29 acres; 3. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 60.29 acres; 4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 42.31 acres; and 5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: The site is currently guided and zoned office according to a plan approved in 1978 . That plan included future development of 360,000 square feet in 3 buildings and 3 multi level parking decks. ( See attached approved plan). Surrounding land is guided and zoned office. The plan meets the square footage limits of the approved plan but shows buildings in different locations and no parking decks. Parking decks are not proposed since the City requirements for office are 4 per 1,000 square feet. In 1978 the requirement was 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Building A, 150,000 square feet, is proposed to be constructed this fall. Building B and C are future buildings. The buildings are located farther back from Anderson Lakes than the approved plan. The buildings meet the required 200 foot shoreland setback. The building meets the setback requirements of the office zoning district. The plan meets parking requirements. Planning Commission Recommendation: At the August 25, 1997 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project subject to additional landscaping along Anderson Lakes. The plan in your packet shows the additional landscaping. p Supporting Reports: 1. Resolutions 2. Staff Report dated August 22, 1997 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 1997 4. Correspondence GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVIEW OF GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES FOR NORTHCO WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the GE Capital/GE Capital Fleet Services PUD Concept by Northco and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 16, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. GE Capital/GE Capital Fleet Services,being in Hennepin County,Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 9, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 25, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 3 Exhibit A GE Capital/GE Capital Fleet Services LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Blocks 1 , 2, and 3, Outlots A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, all in GELCO FIRST ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES FOR NORTHCO BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of GE Capital/GE Capital Fleet Services for Northco dated September 9, 1997, consisting of 42.31 acres into 3 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk S • STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: August 22, 1997 SUBJECT: GE Capital PUD APPLICANT: Northco OWNER: GE Capital LOCATION: East of Prairie Center Drive and South of West 78th Street REQUEST: 1. Planned unit Development Concept Review on 60.29 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 60.79 acres 3. Zoning District Amendment in the Office District on 60.79 acres 4. Site Plan Review on 60.79 acres 5. Preliminary Plat of 42.31 acres. V� Staff Report GE Capital PUD August 22, 1997 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided and zoned office according to a plan approved in 1978 . That plan included future development of 360,000 square feet in 3 buildings and 3 multi level parking decks. ( See attached approved plan). Surrounding land is guided and zoned office. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT The plan meets the square footage limits of the approved plan but shows buildings in different locations and no parking decks. Parking decks are not proposed since the City requirements for office are 4 per 1,000 square feet. In 1978 the requirement was 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Building A, 150,000 square feet, is proposed to be constructed this fall. Building B and C are future buildings. The buildings are located farther back from Anderson Lakes than the approved plan. The buildings meet the required 200 foot shoreland setback. The plan requires an impervious surface waiver from 30%to 34.49%. Building A requires a building height waiver from 30 to 74 feet. SITE PLAN The site plan shows the construction of 3 buildings totaling 360,000 square feet. The base area ratio for the existing and proposed buildings (652,755 s.f.) is .03. The City code permits up to a .30 base area ratio. The floor area ratio is .249. The City code permits up to a .50 floor area ratio. The building meets the setback requirements of the office zoning district. The amount of parking required is 2580 spaces. The plan meets this requirement. GRADING AND TREE LOSS There are 12,238 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. The majority of the trees are oak, ash, maple, spruce and pine. Tree loss is calculated at 22% or 2702 inches. This compares to the average tree loss of 40% for office projects. Tree replacement required is 796 caliper inches. 2 Staff Report GE Capital PUD August 22, 1997 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The project requires the following waivers in the office zoning district. 1. Building height from 30 feet to 74 feet. 2. Impervious surface increase from 30%to 34.49%. The approved plan permitted multi story buildings to a maximum of 7 stories but did not specify a height. One story is approximately 15 feet. Lifetouch is 65 feet tall. The 10400 building on the north side of 494 is 67 feet tall. The existing GE Capital building is 80 feet tall. The proposed building height is consistent with the approved plan and other buildings in the area. The approved plan met the impervious surface requirement due to multi story buildings,parking decks, and sod on the roof. The sod was removed since the roof leaked. Since future buildings and parking decks had not been built, the existing conditions did not exceed the 30% requirement. The impervious surface waiver may have merit for the following reasons. 1. Eighteen (18) acres of land adjacent to the lake was dedicated to the Hennepin Conservation District in 1978. 2. Tree loss in the developed area is low. If the trees in the Hennepin Parks District are inventoried and included in the tree loss calculation,the percentage of tree loss would be less. 3. If the approved plan had been built in 1978, there would be no treatment ponds. All of the existing and proposed hard surface areas will be treated before discharge into the lake. 4. The parking area east of the existing building could be redesigned(see alternative plan) and reduce impervious surface to 32.83%but would change the existing wooded character at the front entrance. 5. The City has previously granted impervious surface waivers on sites near lakes in situations where the strict application of the ordinance would preclude a reasonable development of the site, provided there are treatment ponds and low building coverage. The building coverage is 50%less than the code would allow. 3 9 Staff Report GE Capital PUD August 22, 1997 ARCHITECTURE The buildings meet the exterior material requirements of the office zoning district for face brick, glass, and stone. Mechanical equipment will be screened by a penthouse. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches according to building size,tree replacement, screening of parking, and screening of loading. The amount of caliper inches required is 1,125 inches. The amount of tree replacement required is 796 inches. The landscape plan shows 2,305 inches. Additional plantings are needed along the south edge of the parking lot and within the parking lot to better screen views of the parking from the lake. See attachment A. TRAFFIC Since the building square footage is the same as the approved plan there will be no increase in traffic. The traffic generation is consistent with the City's Transportation Plan which anticipated an office use of the property. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water is available in West 78th Street.. A NURP pond is shown on the plan. CONCLUSION 1. The visual appearance of the proposed plan from West 78th Street and Anderson Lakes is better than the approved plan since buildings are located farther back from the lake and deck parking is not proposed. 2. Tree loss is less than other office projects of a similar size. 3. The plan meets shoreland structure and parking setbacks. The approved plan was a 150 building setback and a 50 foot parking setback. 4. The plan meets water quality standards. The approved plan was volume control only. 4 lO Staff Report GE Capital PUD August 22, 1997 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District, Site Plan Review , and Preliminary Plat, based on plans dated August 22, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 22, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review,the proponent shall: A. Modify the landscape plan according to Attachment A. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 4. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 5. The following waivers from the City code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the office Zoning District: A. Building height from 30 to 74 feet. B. Impervious surface from 30% to 34.49% 5 /f •t'',.- , , 1,,,„-:„J' '-- ..,;.c.; „,, 4,.. ,..j.k. 1 ,-',--, ",-.11(Yi, le-t;!, ‘I'',-,044.:: ,Z,i.,-A,.:'', :••:„i, - 1 '74rA;,-7,7.*, ':,..,"'-t-,r,:,:';',7 'sW:i.', '.'',.A'L,„ 'tE I ,,/,,,, 1...,1:,,L.....,,„_%1" ; f ! I :4'.-",,a'.11! A...",1`., !-"r-, 1 ,;41i,,S1 .'401* -. . y3,) .-41nY-,„,,t.,-- :,'- '..4,7,0%/1'f'k 117-, •-f•-- -7-'i-= '''''' "..-ik ask--zE 1 1 ,e, ‘,,,,,,,,,,.....,.,..7 •-• . .:-,.-g i,nsepa,,Nv- 01$ e.r., Cie 'W.f..-- - ' . -----..2 4.- „, ',,r. 1,g-rt.,--.' 1 \ ' 174ir:5'1,.-1': —--''' 1 \d V. • , C17'' 1 I.kt -%.,'C'1'.''':- •et:,\ -II , rik •,Crij•\ 1 ',,,,,, ,jiMg ir-_-;Z-gA\c--------------- : ' ii.5-', . . ri— r----,‘.,c`i'' ''''',44,"&k ) I , ..5.- --,,--41t,'r •:(Y).i,_ AP:T.-*.e 1 ....-,. ,-----.'- -I , :,1,...k, __ tuf...a.„, ,(c.... .ry / ( /• ,,,, 'ft7,,,,N.,, N,,,, eb' • 7-. --411‘,..11 a• --h. '.'-t.'.LA LrA,..; 7 ....'',76ii5 ,_ _, 2 H , ,,72,,,i.„„),,: t ftSjg C--::;.• -''''-?''''''''''' `. 0 I il-kr'--- ,8,' '' t •.t i --•- , 02.\A-,,, —-----'' , , .,,t., t% trz e...,144. <2 Leo - . it i s ! 1 ';',-,; "3...?, ,.;Ve ' -iii-,---„,,:irtc:',,:\v q-:"'! FE ..li ra I--: 7* ' V.- -„-- ‘.- //- / ..- -,;‘5...,.a...;...,. ), ',1,,,,,t,,,,::: ... , , ,v.c- ,, / / 'N'',-' .t., C( ti:ii--6.4.5.. ,..' a , ,,...,- ‘''',', .-t,=,.:,,,g ''''./e '-- / / \'''''' / . ..'6 .--1'''''\‘ti-,•'• 1 1 r*;,4`..• - Ktr?rni 4:7/ . ',..' '/ '---* ,,...:',, „. ,;__ I , ,c-L.Vt.: 7C `, :-_ ,-,i',., (1;7;, \,\\ I-18 .p.:;-,/;. ;'/,':-L.,I: ,-,-.,'„,' ..-.: ,/ ' %,4\:!Q,.§* ' ‘•;r:tp,,,t‘ 12 CI (4,, 1 d,",,..:„,,-:.' ,•.,';.;,"',',&Y,:- ' 4,->z- yr,.-4-i-"''kxv Wir,t.P et L. Q! , 1,-4,,,744. '-',7•;,;', .-.,',//:-.‘'.,-.1.i. --0 1 = w,... o g 6,-.,-7;_ ,-,• '.,- ...y., -.-•-., -7-', ,;;,, , NK ••: . N /7 , . 1 !,ii ' : :, -.:,-,;.,f...4,,,t-, , -..4...:-4 •,,-- ''--. -,i-,,,.„." -..-1, . .,;‘,1;„ ",, ;;4, 1,,0,4 ,fr; ",•*4...;,ia 4,,,l.,,,, iit:, '..; ,-,t;',„-..%;--/;,-••., 4-.0; ,... , ,-r,/ -;-.,,,."-ri / \\ ,,,,i,,,,,-- A., vc. IE [ '':':'•//// /' 4* S,-) / /,,,-,0,-. 4,;:t ": - I / k* 2-', Si -, f• . I( II -..7", '4., •.,\ .."- e 't; LO 1 cl 1( 1-4T=LA::141'. ,,,,/7-, .:, ,/ .."' --- / ..,,A.,":0,,,,-.7e."" In! < r ,2 2 1,I/ 7( ,-,* (7.- `,n4•S'-';')%1'' / ,,/ : 4,.,;: 0• , ! f -,..z!...,,P• ',,,-- --i$---:,,,- / , ''''.-a.,,' , -fl.T. / o g '',__-/,ill , -- •';) /•./.'.IVilf I a! r; i - 7 "3 .„„/ 0 1 ' , e .f. I ,,, y !,.. ,1= , ' -- I LI _, z,/rq -.1-'' . /..K.4:2_,-, 5 _e 1 \-.:.J ii, k j,,,...„,- ":,,,11:,,,;7,, ‘' :.). „‘, ---, ,,' "4' I' s'i•kii \ \.....)1.:,..,_ %-•,-,,/// ,../12- E. r — . . •'1,,,i ' — ,,,, ' - ,sNs. - •,1 1 ___) . -, : /, .,,. •••,. s., tfq--Z,_ r.,/ /k.1 ',(.; / /- f-••-./..? '/ .4`! , '\---1'.4'"/F- ' , >`If ,•,;,/,',/,$. ''' <:( , 7-:::,, \., / 'i%•-•• /, ';',/ i i'r I i / ,.- / ,,..,..::, // _ttz('-'-' • ) ,,/ UJ 1 \-)11 I •''1*'. - .';-G.-// ,t5',4 4. / , 1 . „2,, - .ncal'• ,, , ,,.... .,,,,--7, ) '7 CC ,,2 LLI , U) 2 . 1,, -).---- - 1 ;\\• \ ...„.. \ j,, ‘, . ,. \s‘ , \\ 1 ), \.1 j .,•\ ; , , ( i igq � _ � ��'POBBBEE EMR/egNN3E AOMEWAWA:2 PATH WEST 78TH STREET fMR1HEDGE / IXErnr snr ® etEom ew,= V �o° o ' _ mo� ,0O ✓ 0ali aa `. �p ' ® p � iOYpO� MpO�pTOSO►�p p O VOo ° V:0oO onlaoVosirli�.- o a- . "A� A .�iia rd �.� ���� 1 ' Oer 0 avw � pr ,kno I oe .{ j ,['mit- I I .aa-�w. 10 HEnoE Q' aIt. ,O \ _ 00`b8♦ - � qo\ .•. •• o ♦ M.' •• aO , . Korsur\ ° O ♦ 1.• APMIALS a Archit t\ \ ••` ♦ t �� a • - : 300 FirsO I O� pO Mnneepc a a00 e12/339 \ 0_ ® • r e00l0 . O _ c fi n ° .I ••.••t FAX O12\ ' ,° \ + / � .o .��` ♦ • / p • • •\ + \ EEVIRY ,•ems• � r ° °••• �. ` :.O•J., o "^^�� GE GAP/ • \ 1 °'�,.Via' •+•'J+V�.••/ O •• in `` , •P ::• ° " TEN PRAI \ ♦ AA, k •� .'`./ Oi�•.• O ENOIY NIV v l •.QO �. ,�! •• ' ` a : ::: \ • ��' ,' PLAZA 0• \ ° •• • �av�� � a ♦ •\.°, �#' �,of a e.•Jo° soo \ o::❖••j��•• `� ,; !, '\ c��i '� 'Lo \v o° •.••• � �,te. / ;terigyp • `a t�\.9 \ ♦4. �� • O p o°ti O e• O• ' Cj \ f•••••• Es�� I� °o o,° •;• ••• Z J/ y{� J° 0>►• •i: O• •� POND D C 0 L' op fP ie �• _i••!<' G� (j LANDSCA 'b 1103**bp. .64 '''• 0. __ —- ••'.. O'l% Al --'?''2:bid 4' r . 4414 "S'� ,.E +oil.• p e �.`,.„ t.tms � Nei Fir AP o o � i4 t ��w� i � � 4j LEGEND - tt — _ rT .arm ' ' to I o �\ �. a' ttl PAISO'A lAf1RS®• O H PUO'AIMO•4.CPL.M %OD MIAMOM. .. ---y•. \ -- '"a. Q�,��(�'Or4�n \, a� • O ss CAL.es Osn r mmasMInr :;}: ...Nnr \ - /� �"__ JYk�is �,,.��-� CS„Y�o9,yPtbock Oo°O I. MILEAF UMW Comm Umoom *ado, MEMONlLLdl 1M WMMgI[OW.0edlogull• FIN OAK BUSH 11000N.mi ` ALQq PATH \�� °�k Ii�P O �� SMA•I IOVII OAK Sat Oa WY* Boren.Nosoa.mr < Oaa°a°aya MUM O EE MAPLE Ptas••a P•<•••.*M1 *** AOara•wnaa ANIMWON _ _ e01NTTEl1Ets•Ed IAt.M Hpatpua°a.•eaa•Ma°•ly -VOROONA yen el O MnEBlS COME/CVO IRON•CM_BB ^/ PAVER 410404 a MOAC HONEYSUCKE - Pk.plum FED BUD COLORADO ORBEHeP11LCE Ocokcom . loVo '"'a'"' Al y p�R P ,. oat• Mepro JM.Ex MOM 1.1Acot anm WPM RP. iL SO+ N AMNON ME TYmelons a 'Wail. (ito) Z iser s \ • Phu rp• M OEOtEE PiiiffiIA1tiB1 MTAL•op Moan NA Aapna dame•MaeThol•co. INA OMEN JUMPER /dtti . ( , \ Na. OE MOTWe•A ON-ea 'IMMowuaP M+M+R�1.O..r I \ NO WAY MAPLE Lb bdoto r• AMMO.antft I \ --. marponder TAUH101 MEAOee MI MM OLLI MOLDISNO Tana mein Tanya AM9•ClN tElMrauS•N•M••Y IGO NPIN OFEY o Erg-.s COW.PM OMB ROM \ \ TE• E Cans tuts Roo...so. FED TTaq DOOMOOO a COSMO DICOUOI ITtEE TO BE MOVED . . OEIS-Le'Ob.,BB Caf.orbea d•M MIFICMOCO . Dame OECOUOue/TEE TO MAWR \AnatnoNoreamain* Mta•na•a•ro••a O• =COMMA MAII4CM4741W °' $ DSRNO COHPEEOUS TREE roseream APPROXIMATE LDCATION OF \ - WAS MAC 010E®@RI wenn 0349 10LS TitH TO MOAN F)0SRN0vr000tA++D ---- AMA Morin 1441144ampa mmomimmi RtAMarvs.10CROvRH FL f'., 76_77- r;j1/4//.1) mA1TMR1 /\ Gheetc•a e PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 7 C. GE CAPITAL/GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES by Northco. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 60.29 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 60.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 60.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 60.29 acres and Preliminary Plat on 42.31 acres. Location: West 78th Street. Franzen reviewed the history of the site. Dennis Zilla with Northco reviewed the proposal and stated they were in agreement with the staff recommendation. However, he did question the requirement for the Park Dedication fee as he believed this was paid when GE dedicated 18% of their property along the lake. He requested clarification on this point. Ron Erickson,KKE Architects,reviewed the original plan that was approved in 1978 which had five buildings and a parking structure. Their intent is to create more of an office park consisting of separated buildings which will open up the site to the lake and they have put the parking under the buildings which will be more aesthetically pleasing. The access to the site will not change nor will the square footage or the uses but the layout will maximize the use of the area and be more pleasing and effective. He described the building materials that will be used. Sandstad inquired about the cash park fee and Franzen responded that staff did not have time to find out what exactly transpired because this issue arose late in the day but the project will be forwarded to the Parks and Recreation Commission who will decide what the requirement will be and what exactly transpired in 1978 will be clarified. Sandstad commented he would prefer to have this issue resolved prior to taking action on the project. Franzen stated that 18 acres were set aside and were controlled by the Hennepin Parks Conservation District. Zilla stated that most of the 18 acres were east of the proposed building and if it was determined that they still owe the cash park fee then they will pay it but they would like to have approval of the request as they have a tenant with some time constraints and it is imperative they move the project forward. Foote asked if Zilla was in agreement with the staff recommendation regarding modification of the landscape plan. Zilla responded they would be willing to do what they need to do to get the project completed. Franzen reviewed the staff report and outlined four reasons why the proposed plan is better than what presently exists on the site. Staff recommended approval of the request with the stipulations included in the staff report, and noted that staff will research this issue of the park dedication fee further to resolve it prior to City Council review. The Public Hearing was opened. Doug Waterman, 10698 Kiawah Drive, asked if West 78th Street would be able to /L/ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 8 handle the traffic and if there would be more light from the parking lot. Franzen responded that the property will need to have the same lighting levels as exist now, but it will be spread out more. They will be adding more traffic signals which will help with the traffic management and there is an upgrade of West 78th Street planned which will help with the traffic also. Wissner asked if they had tenants lined up for both buildings and Zilla responded that they have a tenant for Building A and there are a few possibilities for tenants in Building B but they won't begin construction until they have a firm lease. They will build the first phase of the development and the parking needed for that portion of the development. Ismail stated it was a very nice project, and inquired if a more recent soils report had been obtained as the one in the packet was 20 years old, and this information could be significant. Zilla responded they have since conducted more soil tests and compaction tests and there are some soil issues that they will have to address. They will supply the latest information to Staff. Wissner stated the project was a big improvement from the previous plan. She was concerned about the cash park fee issue and that the traffic issues were being addressed. She supported the project and liked the way it was being constructed in phases. Foote commented he supported the project and it was a good improvement. Alexander stated it was a good plan and while she was concerned about the cash park fee issue she supported the proposal. Clinton commented it was an improvement over the previous plan. He requested staff be sure about the wording regarding the cash park fee issue and to make sure the soil information was adequate. Franzen stated the buildings were sited on the plans based on the original soil report. Staff requires soil information if there is going to be a public road constructed and the Building Department required soils information when building permits are issued to ensure that the structures can be supported. Discussion ensued regarding the cash park fee and what the funds are used for and why they are required. Franzen noted that this issue will be resolved prior to City Council review, and the amount of the cash park fee required changes from year to year which is why staff does not specify an amount. MOTION: Foote moved, seconded by Ismail,to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION: Foote moved, seconded by Ismail, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request by Northco for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 60.29 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 60.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the Office Zoning District on 60.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 60.29 acres and Preliminary Plat on 42.31 acres based on plans dated August 22, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 22, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. If.i EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9-16-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.C. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger THE PINES -JULY 1997 Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing 2. Approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 5.81 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.81 acres; 3. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 5.81 acres; and 4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 5.81 acres into 14 single family lots and one outlot. 5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: This project was first reviewed in April for a 25 lot, single-family development at a density of 4.3 units per acre. The Planning Commission did not support the proposal and asked the proponent to revise the plans based on the current Low Density Residential guiding for the site. After several revisions to the proposal, a 14 lot single-family plan was reviewed meeting the recommendations of the Planning Commission, including the current guide plan, reducing tree loss to approximately 30%, and maintaining large areas of natural buffering from Bluff Road and Highway 169. Waivers are proposed for the project. The waivers may have merit since they help to create a project that is more environmentally sensitive to the site than if the all zoning codes were met. The plans have been revised based on the August 22nd staff report recommendations, including: • revised tree replacement plan. • conservation easements shown to protect the perimeter buffering areas. • meeting setbacks for the decks on lots 7, 8, and 9. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project at its August 25, 1997 meeting. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Recommendation: Due to the Labor Day holiday,the Commission did not have a meeting. The project will be reviewed at the September 15th meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolutions 2. Staff Report dated August 22, 1997 3. Planning Commission minutes dated August 25, 1997 THE PINES -JULY 1997 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVIEW OF THE PINES-JULY 1997 FOR LUNSKI CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on The Pines-July 1997 PUD Concept by Lunski Construction and Design and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 16, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Pines - July 1997, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 9, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 25, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A The Pines - July 1997 • Legal Description: That part of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 116, North, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying East of the West 600 feet and South of a line'running from a point on the West line of said SE -1/4 of the NE 1/4 distant 332 feet North from the SW corner thereof to a point. on the East line of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 distant 443.4 feet North from the' SE .corner thereof, '.. .hereby conveying all that portion SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of said• Section 36 lying East of the West 600 feet thereof and South of Town Road. LI THE PINES -JULY 1997 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE PINES-JULY 1997 FOR LUNSKI CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of The Pines - July 1997 for Lunski Construction and Design dated September 9, 1997, consisting of 5.81 acres into 14 single family lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 2 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. THE PINES -JULY 1997 by Lunski Construction and Design. Request for PUD Concept Review on 5.81 acres,PUD District Review on 5.81 acres, Zoning District change from Rural to R-1-13.5 on 5.81 acres and Preliminary Plat on 5.81 acres into 14 single family lots and one outlot. Location: County Road 18 Frontage Road and Bluff Road. Franzen reviewed the history of the plan which was initially reviewed in April. Perry Ryan,Ryan Engineering and Dennis Lunski with Lunski Construction were present. Ryan reviewed the plan which will include fourteen single family homes and several large natural areas. They have reduced the tree loss to 31% and while they are requesting some variances,they have asked for these to preserve the natural features on the site and maintain the buffered area around the development. Foote asked if the homes were 5' from the property line and Ryan responded they were all more than 5 feet. Foote asked what the distance between the housing footprints was and Ryan responded they were about 20 feet apart. Ryan discussed the roadway layout and design and noted that they have straightened it out to avoid the difficulty with sight lines. Wissner asked about waiver #2 regarding lots not fronting on a public street because there is a Homeowners Association with this development. Franzen responded that although it was technically a private street it was a technicality which is specific to the way the ordinance is written and they have debated whether to change it or not. Staff is supporting this variance because it is not a through street. Sandstad discussed the grading plan which has building footprints shown on it and noted that there were places it appeared the garages were closer together than 25 feet. Franzen responded that the building footprints should reflect the actual building sites where the structures will be located. There are areas where the buildings are located 10 feet from the property lines between the units. Ryan noted that they have 5 feet and 7 feet between the units on lots 5 and 9. Ismail commented this plan has seven waivers and Franzen noted that because the plan initially proposed 25 lots and most of those lots had waivers this would be less than half the waivers which were initially requested. Franzen stated that staff recommended approval of the plan subject to the stipulations in the staff report. The Public Hearing was opened. Marian Steefe, 9700 Falcon's Way, asked about the conservation easements and the pond. Franzen explained that these easements are to protect this land in a natural state which prevents the land owners from altering this area of the site in any way. The pond is to be a water quality pond which will collect any pollutants and the cleaner water will go into the storm sewer. The City has an easement to allow them to do any maintenance work that may be needed on the pond. Steefe asked about a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 3 berm and if the property would be planted with trees to screen the site. Franzen responded that there was no berm but the ponding requirements would be done with some effort made to screen it from the roadway. Ryan reviewed the landscape plan and discussed the tree types which would be planted. Foote asked how it would affect the tree loss if they put more area between the houses. Ryan responded it would go up considerably and they could have spread the houses out more but it would have significantly increased the number of trees lost. By moving the houses closer together they would be able to save many more trees. Foote commented that tree preservation was very important and he was willing to support the variances for that reason but he was concerned about the houses being so close together. Sandstad asked how the conservation easement would be marked and Franzen responded that the City has some stakes which will be used to mark the boundaries of the conservation easement so people will know what it is. These are special stakes which denote the boundary is there. Sandstad stated he supported the development. Wissner commented this was a single family residential development which would have a Homeowners Association, which is something people want to have, and she supported the project. Ismail inquired what the average asking price for a home would be in this development and Ryan responded it would be approximately $280,000. Alexander stated she liked the plan much better than the previous plan and she supported the project. Clinton commented he was also supportive of the project as proposed. MOTION:Wissner moved,seconded by Foote,to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 6-0. The Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Wissner moved, seconded by Foote to recommend approval of the request of Lunski Construction and Design for PUD Concept Review on 5.81 acres, PUD District Review on 5.81 acres,Zoning District change from Rural to R-1-13.5 on 5.81 acres and Preliminary Plat on 5.81 acres into 14 single family lots and one outlot based on plans dated August 15, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 22, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. f7 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: August 22, 1997 SUBJECT: The Pines APPLICANT: Lunski Construction & Design FEE OWNER: Dennis Lunski LOCATION: Southwest corner of Bluff Road and Hennepin Town Road (old County Road 18) REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 5.8 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 5.8 acres. 3. Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.8 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 5.8 acres into 14 lots and 1 outlot. 1 • , • , • . • ,ru/ -•-..,... ...„,lrt c..rcremitt/ . OR i vi• i ' ' J 0 Cl=1/ 0\C r `c-;it_._i Ar_09i I . __.....--, 1 , . I 4 -./ r- • • • • .., .• I 1z1 I ! ' j \ I •-• Lii•-.. --.: ':"'' „a •)...... 1-- CE Er )-- , Ei E ..ff--,_,4 i t I 1 : ii. ' .1'.il.:;' 1 I ; I I l • i ! 1 1:7„. i i ..-^ I I 1 . '' /' '.1 \ ' 'FIT- i•.-±., ,i 1 . • , ; .•x. ---' rRi Ail ii-7 --14, -1 'c'<c• . - ';-:.,.'t \ k \ 1! ! ! ; oi-;10 •T• I 1 1. r ' 1 t \ \ H I 1 N -0 0, u - .------- ! ,:.. CO. R0.1 It 011 •// -7-7-41 k. i /14?7•17V;i4.-PC 1 il —\A' Cf )15c2;1171: i. . . \:...::.....,.. \ „._ r: •i..! .,.:::.i ,' —ri 1:-7.'"1 - • )- .' " •r• •-• 0 1-11 44.1 la i t ' ..1 i J CO •:L.•,:; ' ,' cu C.-----/ -.1'alLU-LFFI / /1 . 'i ,/ , I • , - / •C..._ 0: ,,i;tt:• .. . .7,-1:i% T .: ,..... ., ' . s.etAA14 -1) L ‘•-,-- i.-„ <4•• z :-,/. , s.,,.. i 41 P•• --' .e- '..: . h.., .2 ..:. i . - kZ• -1\ ,-4/ ..4-7--1--.,f ...... .1, 'NA r ---i'-1, ...:• .e...sii i• V. r.7. , I I _•,'.i AL '7.1/ (A.,N .CA\ I--- ,, ,.4. .);r 42-,. -- cc r; .3 7 3 / <-- ,,1 ---N--' 7.1-1-1h ..\.1,• , C3\ r''';>-* ''.• " • ., • • 1 i -. •1 ? • ,:• 1 ,___ ____ ...\,(2,/!..._....., ...:..si.5 j IT C,.7 E:-:''...1 ;••; :, .::i:. . r 1..:•.-:..i.i 41 h VIP} I / I 1 1 I 17—.2 .-.-.-....-71---------s-M-'--"--°IC) I I RI.•.•-•:.T4.Sf.S:s.gs t: , I I 7— .../- ! / I I I . . . . • I I / I I I • i •. I \ 1•. • I . . . I I . . . . . . . •.•. •. . . . . I . .. . . , I I I I . .• . • • • . . , • •. . • . I to' 9 4 1 The Pines Staff Report August 22, 1997 BACKGROUND This project was first reviewed by the Planning Commission in April 1997 for a 25 unit single-family development at a density of 4.3 units per acre. A guide plan change to Medium Density was proposed. The Commission recommended that the proponent revise the plans for single-family based on the current low density guiding for the property with no more than 30% tree loss and which preserves large areas of tree mass for buffering to the highway and surrounding land uses. In May, a revised concept plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission which added a 4 acre parcel to the south and met the recommendations of Commission. This revised concept did not go forward because the property owner to the south withdrew from the proposal. The 5.8 acre property is guided Low Density Residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. The property is zoned Rural. Surrounding land uses consist ofBluffs East 7th Addition to the north, zoned RM-6.5 for 25 multi-family units,Creek Ridge Estates to the south, zoned Rural for 3 single-family lots,with 2,one-acre single-family lots to the west,zoned Rural. The highway 169 frontage road is located to the east. SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT The current proposal is to rezone the property from Rural to R1-13.5 and plat the property into 14 single-family lots and one outlot. The density is 2.4 units per acre,meeting the existing low density guiding for the property,and is a transitional density to the surrounding property. All units take access from the proposed private road. No unit will take direct access to Bluff Road as previously proposed. The proposal depends on the following waivers through the PUD District Review: 1. Use of a private street in a single-family zoning district. Code requires public streets in the single-family zoning district. 2. Lots without frontage on a public street for lots 5 thru 9. Code requires single-family lots to front on a public street. 3. Lot size less than 13,500 sq. ft. for lots 6 and 9. These lots are 11,400 sq. ft. and 10,400 sq. ft. respectively. Average lot size for the development is 16,800 sq. ft. 4. Lots with less than 85 feet of frontage(55 feet on a cul-de-sac)for lots 2 thru 6, and lots 9 and 10. 5. Lots with less than 85 feet average width for lots 4, 6, 9, 12 and 13. 2 10 The Pines Staff Report August 22, 1997 6. Front yard setback of 20 feet for lot 1, and 25 feet for lots 5, 6, 7, 12 thru 14. Code requires 30 feet. 7. Side yard setbacks totaling less than 10 feet on one side and 25 feet for both sides for lots 2 thru 6, 8 thru 14. The use of PUD waivers is to provide for a better environmental design for the property than a proposal meeting all City codes. The waivers proposed do result in a better design based on the following reasons: 1. Tree loss has been reduced from 45% to 31%. This is consistent with other single-family residential developments. In addition, large tree masses which border the property are saved. These areas can be protected in conservation easements. 2. Average lot size is 16,800 sq. ft. 3. All lots take access from the private road. No units will access Bluff Road as previously proposed. Lots 7,8,and 9 show decks encroaching into the 20 foot rear yard setback. These decks will need to be relocated to the side of the units, or removed from the plans. ACCESS The cul-de-sac length has been reduced from 625 feet shown in the original plan down to 500 feet meeting City code. The road width is 24 feet near the access with Bluff Road in order to save a cluster of trees,then widens to a standard public road width of 28 feet. All units now access the private road. The minimum driveway length is 25 feet as previously recommended, and in most cases exceed 30 feet. This will provide for additional guest parking. GRADING AND TREE LOSS The proposal shows preservation of large tree masses around the perimeter of the site. These areas should be placed within conservation easements as shown in Attachment A. The City Forester has determined that 521 caliper inches of significant trees will be lost, or 31%. This is consistent with the average tree loss for residential developments. Tree replacement is 216 caliper inches. The tree replacement plan needs an additional 20 caliper inches. 3 11 The Pines Staff Report August 22, 1997 UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Municipal sewer and water service is available to the property from Bluff Road. Sewer and water will be extended to the south property line for future connection to the adjacent property. The preservation of a number of trees on the site depends on a carefully designed and implemented utility plan. Services for each of the units will need to be strategically placed in areas away from existing trees. Prior to any grading permit for the property, the proponent will need to submit detailed utility plans to the City that show customized alignments to protect the existing trees. A NURP pond is proposed for the property. This pond has been designed to work around the existing significant trees. ARCHITECTURE A similar architectural design is proposed for each unit on the property. The units will look similar to the Boulder Ridge development and consist mainly of stucco and brick. CONCLUSIONS Staff supports the direction the project has taken for the following reasons: 1. The density has been reduced from 4.3 units per acre in the original plan to 2.4 units per acre consistent with the existing low density guide plan. 2. All direct access to Bluff Road has been removed which is better for safety reasons since no units back on to the road. 3. Large areas of tree massing will be preserved around the perimeter of the property. Conservation easements will be placed over these areas for protection. 4. The project provides a transitional density to the surrounding property. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers, Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated August 15, 1997, subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated August 22, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 4 12 • The Pines Staff Report August 22, 1997 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the tree replacement plan for 521 caliper inches. B. Revise the plans to show conservation easements as depicted in Attachment A. C. Relocate or remove the decks from the units on lots 7, 8, and 9. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. Said plans shall include details regarding the sewer and water service alignments to the proposed units which preserve the existing trees. B. Provide a conservation easement for recording at Hennepin County for the protection of the existing trees as depicted in Attachment A. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Provide a tree replacement surety according to code. 5. The following waivers are granted through the PUD District Review based on the August 15, 1997 plans: A. Use of a private street in a single-family zoning district. Code requires public streets in the single-family zoning district. B. Lots without frontage on a public street for lots 5 thru 9. Code requires single-family lots to front on a public street. 5 13 The Pines Staff Report August 22, 1997 C. Lot size less than 13,500 sq. ft. for lots 6 and 9. These lots are 11,400 sq. ft. and 10,400 sq. ft. respectively. D. Lots with less than 85 feet of frontage (55 feet on a cul-de-sac)for lots 2 thru 6, and lots 9 and 10. E. Lots with less than 85 feet average width for lots 4, 6, 9, 12 and 13. F. Front yard setback of 20 feet for lot 1, and 25 feet for lots 5, 6, 7, 12 thru 14. Code requires 30 feet. G. Side yard setbacks totaling less than 10 feet on one side and 25 feet for both sides for lots 2 thru 6, 8 thru 14. 6 Z 0 > BLUFFS EAST 7TH ADDITION i I ! 1 0 ,c i u- _--- _-- ; ....--7---- I ) 1 L_ — --- --- _ , --- 3.(7-A-1)-----• i I — — — — 1 ___________ ,,s,. i•--,.„ f I f ••. ..7... ' 13.htiFf --_,,„ „ -,s.-. 5rc" '''''c'' _ ,..., ,z \ _ V,e• "MI ..4 , ..,,., , ..,, - I 0 ,.... *.-- \.... . 4 1 „.3' , ,, i . /'',// 7 • I ; -- --- - ..t. 1 ''', ' •vil. .,• •i" .?‘', ,,,-. •'• 7,/g /7 A. ' . i --.•-•, ------ / •,.. j • 4 -• ----...L. •. 4,_.. 4 .*4., " .,..i I 74,.. :-. , • ' '. ''' ''''' 'c ''-'4- ?f' ' f ; ( : ' ! I, ; ..6_,F,:-, 0 -- ' e • • ,..--- P '• ' !>„ ,,, \ 1 -. , . 0 ,./N:i ‘.\.4,• .",,'',._.," ,I,H1/. i i"/..,,.1'-'". 6 , -----/ ‘. . ,-,..;..4 -->......,, ----- '. r....--- . . ., . ' / \ if/'s 1 , ,/' / 1 •- ., •- •.,., ..,.. ''%., . , .•., .. \ — .. ,. '...‘.. . : , . ,\ -'''„ IP, ' ' 7 i I/' '' ' ...", ' ! „ .70 . a , ..„......10. .1,._ ! , - ' ,/ ,, . ,1\,, \, - i —'..\ „),,-a ' Nt445 `:',I ., ‘'''\.s ' .„.1.*-----11(II ..-"'-:L'i \\ -----,-- 5,- 4 ! ,: • ,-b .-.g )‘W/Ars."‘•,,46,' ///, \\,,\ i .,! , i • v --:,_ i 1." -"AV/41// ,,, , //At'*of -2 I ". a'''-.-..1., -, -", i ! '..-,:.:__ -,.,x x_„.....A-,13,, . \ , . 7' __•_-_-.... : ' ''', K/)51'. J,Ii. . ...,...,; , -.....;-. \ _A.) - *----754 . 'i - .'../..// /KA'•./---eAlir ! 1 i',...Z I \ . : ,,,..4 1 „ '44 ''40 ,- . .,.„›.,N' / 1 , 1 •- .-` .'41.44 ' .--'''.. • ' //51'•9 ," , 14,-,',;.:6-:',ii,'. :;1,:r7 I , L. Ni , A° ‘..\.. . .'\ 4 •4:- -/ '' - '' , / / 11,''''''''''''rZi,e44/:// tl iifili ' • ' , . • '—''.:- — \ 3AS • 3 \,-1____;' / / .:>-4(,'',: :--- '', 4.4{,i'i ':1,*:;nii= , \ ',r4 'N.,„ .N.,7;1,', , e , •IC,\ ______\' — \' 6 •6 ,-, ./. ------ --- _...-----c--,...//.2,', -' :.1 Li''',. 1 , , .z,•,P !, ' .7-Az--,,..-4,..bz/,-,- / I-r, '-<--iel "7---!---77------ :-I s..-•4 am ', _-- ' '-:-.4,00 ,,- ,,„.L,-,V= , .- ,.,,- ...---,..---- /,,..,....,- !Li) ---..... ; --,,,I. . , _.,, '• , .• ... . ,-,..-tc: '75\ — • - - - . ', ___;,,,, ,: ' 'L.---: ,/,-'.. -' .! -• .. .c.-.; ,i, / . .... ."., ,....„..-; ,..„...,,,,,.....,,,,....- ,, r...,... artall...Pilli...- '''-,,----------1, '':,,' a.f"-, gr• • ,.... -.... •-•.'- - sdr---1111ftr.---_ - /./,,,/,'....„-------,,-'. ,..-...-, ,,.....-;:::-:---.-- ...--„-ei.,I.1„,r----- • • . .. , . . ., 40V='-',----------------*4--. -' ....1: 0"1. --___-:-_-_+--..----.:,./ ,'_,.....---- ,-;•!.-;,-/./.,,-,.;- .,.;,_,-.L_---_-.: . li,---_, ____ •.•_—____. _____,, k - , -_,, 41 -1.-- _::: -.----;--------------4•-A-_-'.--=. i -•- ,,,''''''''''':::-,_:-•:-='-'•2..; .' ..-.-----'',7',;7_,- I_i- ." • . .. , . . , /I O /lot r gp i NE 5 ‘0 hi SElt vAri or.) RilE 141 E NT$ /5' attar-hotig,vt A EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 9-16-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.D. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL Michael D.Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing 2. Approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 7.51 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 7.51 acres; 3. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 7.51 acres; and 4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat on 7.51 acres. 5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: The site is currently guided and zoned Community Commercial. The site plan shows an 11,727 square foot building. The plan meets the base area and floor area requirements. The building meets the setback requirements of the Community Commercial Zoning District. The amount of parking required is 70 spaces. The plan meets this requirement. Planning Commission Recommendation: At the August 25, 1997 meeting the Planning Commission vote 3-0-3 to approve the project. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolutions 2. Staff Report dated August 22, 1997 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated August 25, 1997 4. Correspondence WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVIEW OF WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL FOR WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel PUD Concept by Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on September 16, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel,being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated September 9, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated August 25, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel Legal Description: Lot 1,Block 1, Edenvale Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5 WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL FOR WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel for Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel dated September 9, 1997, consisting of 7.51 acres into 1 lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 16th day of September, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Lj STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: August 22, 1997 SUBJECT: Washburn McReavy Chapel APPLICANT: Washburn McReavey Funeral Chapel OWNER: Edenvale Investors LOCATION: East of Mitchell Road opposite Martin Drive REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.51 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.51 acres 3. Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 7.51 4. Site Plan Review on 7.51 acres 5. Preliminary Plat of 7.51 into one lot 1 / // ' / I/ 04 1 ' )\,:f..,cil.'''':il 1 A \ i (Ilv 1•••• :: .tk\ji IYA i• s;PC- r "119411pp 1 . u, , N N , / . ....... ,,..4„ 4,.. !, ,.. ... .,IL ,, .. . . s t No1, r 1...":.•4,41 , ... - i . Ak . i 1'..d '`-t-•/7c7r,,J i';!td0 r ' '.' . .witalalli .. r > It P m ... : E CF..N\iA.....1•:.? Pi :.:: ....? :-.: ; i•• • , ••-x"r';;; i.; ..7' ' ‘...t'..• , - CE NT t.:Yi y 1111K0 :) ,:.I.,1.• L:i ANAGRAM -4- DRIVE ..-.: • • ,-,,A, , C. 1111 wouie .ellilliffilli."11111.11111"."' / _.-..........,...../<...............V- \ X (1.. ; .3) z' \ I \---- ( \ ... . . ... .. . . . . IL,,,, .........„ ...,.. ......„, ogr,!E N,......:-.-- 0-• T E CNNOLO _ ' .,.'::A";;'US •. '.. 2.r....1 ;CO cz • _..• ..... • ni... .... ' 1.--.''''s------------7. 1--- . ........... ....... i 1 . -• , • - • crl# i ••.•.•...-•• , . .,. . a_1 1.N CPT Tr/ /c4 / / riC:10 — • Eill 1 0 a.,......,,t ...., .4* N , . ,...., , 0 _ II ., ' Tiparj,.7:4 . bx, .... 26 ... r---1 ' wraokN, .'. ,----, .4.\ ,s ..',(1'.... 'v-) Staff Report Washburn McReavy Chapel August 22, 1997 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided Community Commercial. Surrounding land is guided Industrial and Community Commercial. The site is currently zoned Community Commercial. Surrounding land is zoned Community Commercial and Industrial. SITE PLAN The site plan shows the construction of 11,727 square foot building on 7.51 acres at a .032 base area ratio. The City code permits up to a .20 base area ratio. The floor area ratio is .036. The City code permits up to a .50 floor area ratio. The building meets the setback requirements of the Community Commercial Zoning District. The amount of parking required is 70 spaces. The plan meets this requirement. GRADING AND TREE LOSS There are 130 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. The majority of the trees are cottonwood. Tree loss is calculated at 130 inches. Tree replacement required is 172 caliper inches. ARCHITECTURE The buildings meet the exterior material requirements of the Community Commercial Zoning District for face brick and glass. Mechanical equipment will be inside the building. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches according to building size,tree replacement, screening of parking, and screening of loading. The amount of caliper inches required is 70 inches. The plan meets this requirement. The amount of tree replacement required is 172 inches. The landscape plan has 220 inches. The plan needs 22 more inches. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water is available in Mitchell Road. A NURP pond is shown on the plan. 2 1 Staff Report Washburn McReavy Chapel August 22, 1997 SIGNS City code permits one, 20 foot high, 80 square foot pylon on one street frontage. The signs meet the required size height and setbacks. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District, Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated August 22, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated August 22, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscape plan to add 22 inches. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 4. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 8 D. WASHBURN MCREAVY FUNERAL CHAPEL by Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.51 acres, Planned Unit Development district Review on 7.51 acres,Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 7.51 acres, Site Plan Review on 7.51 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.51 acres. Location: East on Mitchell Road, east of Martin Drive. Franzen reviewed the history of the development in the area and the various uses that were proposed which did not develop except for the restaurants. He noted that the site was guided and zoned for the proposed use. Mark Folk, architect, described the architectural features that will be used on the building and noted that they have met with staff to develop the plans according to City ordinances and Code requirements. Sandstad asked about the cremation room shown on the plans and Folk responded that it was a room in which people could keep the cremains of their loved ones,but was not a crematorium. Bill McReavy explained that they own their own crematorium in Hopkins which will also serve this facility. Wissner commented that there are presently two funeral homes in Eden Prairie and she was concerned about where additional business would come from to support a third funeral home. McReavy stated that his family has been in this business for 140 years and they offer a complete range of services. They are concerned about the need for their facility also and have done a great deal of demographic research in Eden Prairie to determine that the project is moving towards something like Edina with about 400 resident deaths within the next 15 years or so. They want to be well established in Eden Prairie prior to reaching this period. Wissner inquired what they would provide that other funeral homes did not and McReavy responded that they own their own crematorium which enables them to be most competitive in this area and they would offer a choice of facilities to the Eden Prairie residents. Foote inquired why they wanted to build now if the need was not going to materialize for another 15-20 years. McReavy responded they have been serving Eden Prairie residents in their Hopkins facility and other facilities and many Eden Prairie families have gone to other funeral homes because they are closer. They want to give families in Eden Prairie a choice. Ismail asked what the death rate in Eden Prairie was now and what it was projected to be in 15 years. McReavy responded that this information is always a few years behind and the demographic research is something that is fairly accurate. Based on current information there would be about 5 to 6 deaths per 1,000 people in Eden Prairie at the present time, and this is projected to increase over the next 15 years. They have been extremely successful in Edina and have been advised by their researcher that Eden Prairie is the place they should locate next. Alexander inquired how many deaths there were in Eden Prairie in a year and McReavy responded there were about 150 deaths per year presently. Alexander stated there were two funeral homes in Eden Prairie now and Hopkins and Edina were not so far away. She did not want to put an existing funeral home out of business by permitting q PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 9 another funeral home to come into the City. McReavy stated they would also be serving Minnetonka,Bloomington,Hopkins,and other communities and they want to be well established by the time the need is there. Wissner stated there were many people who held wakes and funerals in their churches and she wondered if this was a trend that would continue. McReavy responded that every funeral must be handled by a licensed funeral home and where the wakes and funerals are held is based on the wishes of the families. Franzen gave the staff report and noted the project met the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and is a permitted use on this site. Staff recommended approval of the project. Foote inquired if there were any traffic issues with the plan and Franzen responded negatively, noting that because this building is not maximizing the site there is adequate parking available, and this is not the type of business which will impact any rush hour traffic periods. Ismail asked about Albin Chapel and when it would be open for business, and Fr n7en responded they just obtained their building permit. The Public Hearing was opened. Paul Huber, owner of Huber Funeral Home on Glory Lane, stated they built Huber Funeral Home in Eden Prairie for the future and they object to this proposal. The death rate in Eden Prairie ranges between 90-100 deaths a year and they need to have about 70 calls to break even. They are very surprised this time that a third funeral home wants to come in to Eden Prairie. He stated he was approached by Bill McReavy regarding selling his funeral home to him and when he refused,McReavy told him that they would be building a new funeral home in Eden Prairie in the near future. McReavy stated he had called Mr. Huber as a professional courtesy but he had not made any threats to Mr. Huber regarding the sale of his business. He wanted to let him know that they would be coming into the City but was not pressuring him to sell his business. Competition is healthy for business and they will be in competition with Mr. Huber with this new facility. Sandstad stated he did not share a concern about limiting the numbers of businesses in the City and as it was a permitted use and a nice project he supported the proposal. Its not the function of government to limit the numbers of a specific type of business within the community and he believed the proposal should be evaluated on its merits. Wissner commented that there were more funeral homes than are needed, but it was an appropriate use for this site and she would support the project. Foote stated it bothered him that they will probably see one of these funeral homes empty in a few years because of the example of the Lunds grocery store, and he did not support the proposal because he felt it was poor planning to permit this use. Ismail concurred, noting the City did not need a third /funeral home at this time,but perhaps it would be IV PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 25, 1997 Page 10 more appropriate in five years or more. Sandstad stated the Commission had not held the other uses to the same criteria as they were attempting to do with this project,and it was unfair to make this project meet a stricter criteria than others which had been reviewed. All the review criteria for all projects should be the same. Foote responded noting he did not feel using an office building as an analogy was fair because they were somewhat speculative in nature. He did not support office buildings which were purely speculative buildings. Clinton stated they have to approve the use based on what the ordinance requirements and guiding are for the site. He asked what alternative uses an existing funeral home could be turned into and Franzen responded that the Huber and Albin funeral homes could revert to office uses if they ceased to be used as funeral homes. He discussed the zoning and permitted uses,noting they need to take action based on this aspect. Ismail asked how far this issue could be addressed or if they have to approve a plan based on its compliance with City codes or if they can take other factors into account. Franzen responded they can continue it to have a legal opinion submitted by the City Attorney. Foote commented he felt he had to abstain from the vote because he cannot support the project and his conscience will not allow him to vote for denial. Alexander concurred with Foote and noted the City does not need to have more businesses going bankrupt and she would also abstain from the vote. Wissner stated she felt that legally there was nothing that needed to be addressed,but she would support the project in order to move it through the process. Ismail stated he would also abstain from voting. Sandstad asked the Commissioners not to abstain from voting because it was arbitrary or not defined within the parameters of the ordinances or codes. Discussion ensued regarding the legality of the application versus being able to weigh the good of a use for the City as a whole. Foote asked if the City Council had more discretion in making a decision and Franzen responded that the City Council was bound by the same rules and regulations and would have to review the project based on whether it met the criteria or not. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Wissner, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 3-0-3. Foote,Alexander and Ismail abstained. MOTION: Sandstad moved,seconded by Wissner to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Washburn McReavy Funeral Chapel for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.51 acres,Planned Unit Development district Review on 7.51 acres,Zoning District Amendment in the Community Commercial Zoning District on 7.51 acres,Site Plan Review on 7.51 acres and Preliminary Plat of 7.51 acres based on plans dated August 22, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated August 22, 1997. Motion carried 3-0-3. Foote,Alexander and Ismail abstained. II e15 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 2G2r1 SECTION: Consent Calendar 9/16/97 prairie DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Payment of Claims VI. Checks 55665 to 56225 Wire Transfers 62 to 71 Action/Direction: Approve Payment of Claims COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) DIVISION TOTAL LEGISLATIVE $70.70 GENERAL SERVICES $20,253.48 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $55,934.43 HUMAN RESOURCES $523.00 COMMUNITY SERVICE $632.40 ENGINEERING $28.29 INSPECTIONS $8.51 FACILITIES $301.18 ASSESSING $168.40 POLICE $19,274.46 FIRE $5,573.90 ANIMAL CONTROL $950.00 STREETS & TRAFFIC $201,184.72 PARK MAINTENANCE $21,257.47 STREET LIGHTING $403.37 FLEET SERVICES $22,589.12 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $24,817.74 COMMUNITY DEV $801.20 COMMUNITY CENTER $8,255.68 HISTORICAL $200.00 YOUTH RECREATION $6,346.21 SPECIAL EVENTS $2,732.55 ADULT RECREATION $1,373.82 RECREATION ADMIN $61.43 ADAPTIVE REC $62.43 OAK POINT POOL $51.00 ARTS $3,706.09 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $1,183,741.45 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $515.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $1,025.00 CITY CENTER $62.11 SW METRO TRANSIT $25.36 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $1,127.53 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $28,397.27 PRAIRIEVIEW $60,422.68 CUB FOODS $51,403.71 PRESERVE $395.12 WAr.'R DEPT $97,336.66 SEWER DEPT. $19,936.75 STORM DRAINAGE $9,038.73 AGENCY FUNDS $747.92 $1,851,736.87* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 55665 $130.80 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 55666 $61.43 HELLING, LAURIE MISCELLANEOUS RECREATION ADMIN 55667 $160.98 HOLIDAY INN LAKESIDE TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 55668 $97.53 INTERSTATE BEARING EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55669 $1,066.29 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55670 $2,800.00 LA LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT CO SPECIAL EVENTS FEES CASH PARK FEES 55671 $2,191.21 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 55673 $140.00 MN SECTION AWWA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 55674 $127.74 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 55675 $155.16 RAINBOW FOODS - CHARGES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55676 $321.68 RDO EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55677 $90.00 MEGHAN, SMITH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 55678 $8,000.00 US POSTMASTER POSTAGE GENERAL 55679 $314.95 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 55681 $477.12 WAHLS ENTERPRISES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 55682 $5.95 ABBOTT, GENE DEPOSITS ESCROW 55683 $50.00 AERIAL FACILITIES RENTAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55684 $160.00 APWA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 55685 $50.00 ARCADIA FINANCIAL LTD STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55686 $219.27 AT&T TELEPHONE GENERAL 55687 $50.00 CONNECT COMPANY STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55688 $36.00 DONNA, PAULA RFND PRIVATE SWIM LESSONS POOL LESSONS 55689 $45.00 ELLENS, CHERYL HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55690 $5.95 ENGER, CHRIS DEPOSITS ESCROW 55691 $10.00 GILROY, PATRICIA RFND SKATING LESSONS ICE ARENA 55692 $7.24 GLYER, ANGELA RFND 2 SWIM LESSONS POOL LESSONS 55693 $6.08 GORDON, WHITNEY MILEAGE AND PARKING DAY CAMP 55694 $20.00 GRIFFITH, BRENT DEPOSITS ESCROW 55695 $288.59 GROVE NURSERY CENTER LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL REFORESTATION 55696 $202.52 HARLON, STEVE. REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FIRE 55697 $10.00 HOEFT, JULIE DEPOSITS ESCROW 55698 $40.00 HUTCHINS, BRUCE DEPOSITS ESCROW • 55699 $40.00 JOHNSON, BECKI DEPOSITS ESCROW 55700 $51.00 KETTELL, PAULA RFND SKATING LESSONS ICE ARENA 55701 $20.00 KOTCHEVER, SUSAN DEPOSITS ESCROW 55702 $5.95 KRAUSE, MARY DEPOSITS ESCROW 55703 $50.00 KROCAK, BOB AMPHITHEATRE RENTAL • SPECIAL EVENTS 55704 $50.00 LIEN, DALE AMPHITHEATRE RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55705 $50.00 MCDONALDS ROUND LAKE PAVILION SPECIAL EVENTS 55706 $530.19 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ELECTRIC STORMWATER LIFTSTATION 55707 $1,147.54 MROZLA, JAMES MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE 55708 $10.00 MUNZER, JULIE DEPOSITS ESCROW 55709 $50.00 NORTH CENTRAL CONSULTING INC HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55710 $51.00 PAZ, LUZ RFND SKATING LESSONS ICE ARENA 55711 $626.86 RICOH CORPORATION RENTALS GENERAL 55712 $41.05 RITZ CAMERA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TREE DISEASE 55713 $5.95 RUE, RODNEY DEPOSITS ESCROW 55714 $233.97 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 55715 $55.00 VOSBURGH, ROBERT HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55716 $50.00 WATERTOWER STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL SPECIAL EVENTS 55717 $242.97 WESTWELD SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55718 $20.00 YARUSSO, JULIE DEPOSITS ESCROW 55719 $40.00 ZIEBOL, FRED DEPOSITS ESCROW 55720 $100.00 ANDERSON, STEVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55721 $100.00 ANITZBERGER, JIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 55722 $80.00 ARMOND, ERICK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55723 $100.00 BESSER, PATRICIA VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55724 $100.00 BOOMGAARDEN, MARK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55725 $80.00 BORTH, BRET VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55726 $100.00 BOYCE, MARY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55727 $100.00 C H ROBINSON VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55728 $100.00 CARL, DAVID VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55729 $100.00 CHESSER, EVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55730 $100.00 CRYMBLE, CHUCK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55731 $100.00 ENGMAN, CHRIS ' VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55732 $100.00 EVENSON, GORDON VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55733 $100.00 GAYTHER, MAARIE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55734 $80.00 GTI, CARLA BROWN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55735 $100.00 HAGEN SYSTEMS, INC., STEVE PET VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55736 $100.00 HALLONQUIST, KEN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55737 $100.00 HAMEL, GREG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55738 $100.00 HANSON, TONY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55739 $100.00 HINES, PETE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55740 $100.00 HOGUE, MARK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55741 $100.00 ISAACS, GARY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55742 $100.00 JOHNSON, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55743 $100.00 KELLOGG, RANDY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55744 $100.00 KENNER, SUE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55745 $100.00 KNAVER, TOM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55746 $100.00 KOTTKE, MARY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55747 $100.00 LEKANDER, DAVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55748 $100.00 MADSON, BRAD VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55749 $100.00 MALEVICH, STEVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55750 $60.00 MARSH, DAN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55751 $100.00 MIETZEL, DONI VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55752 $100.00 MILANO, DAVID VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55753 $100.00 MILLARD, CHRIS VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55754 $60.00 MOLIN, JAMES VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55755 $100.00 MONAHAN, JEFFREY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55756 $100.00 MORAIN, LORI VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55757 $100.00 MORRIS, BOB VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55758 $80.00 MOSCATELLI, REBECCA VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55759 $100.00 MULQUEENY, MIKE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55760 $100.00 NELLIS, GRANT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55761 $100.00 NIEBUHR, PAUL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55762 $100.00 NIKKEL, PAUL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55763 $100.00 O'BERT, BRENT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55764 $100.00 OLSON, GREGORY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55765 $100.00 OLSON, HEATHER VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55766 $100.00 ONDRACHEK, TAMMY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55767 $80.00 PAHL, DAN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55768 $100.00 PATNODE, BEN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55769 $100.00 PETERS, JODI VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55770 $100.00 PETSINGER, HOWIE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55771 $100.00 POWER, MIKE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55772 $100.00 PROCESS, JANET VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55773 $100.00 RAMOLA, MICHELE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55774 $80.00 RIESINGER, BOB VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55775 $100.00 RIOUX, MICHAEL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55776 $100.00 SIPPEL, DOUG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL q COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 55777 $100.00 SMITH, JOHN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55778 $100.00 SOMMERDORF, DEAN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55779 $100.00 STAMP, MIKE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55780 $100.00 STARR, BRAD VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55781 $100.00 STENDER, KIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55782 $80.00 STRAZANTI, MARC VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55783 $100.00 STREMPKE, LAREE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55784 $100.00 SUTERA, TOM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55785 $100.00 SYNSTEGAARD, DAVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55786 $100.00 TETRICK, PETE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55787 $100.00 TOON, DAVID VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55788 $100.00 TORGERSON, ERIC VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55789 $100.00 WATSON, DAVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55790 $100.00 WESTBERG, KRIS VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55791 $100.00 WHALEN, TOM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55792 $100.00 WHITAKER, TYLER VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55793 $100.00 WILLY, KIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55794 $100.00 WOLKENBROD, JAY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55795 $100.00 YAEGER, MATT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55796 $80-.00 YORK, DEBBIE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55797 $100.00 ZIMMERMANN, STUART VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55798 $100.00 ANDERSON, GREG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55799 $100.00 ANNALA, JAY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55800 $100.00 BEDUHN, TIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55801 $100.00 BLAKE, DAN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55802 $100.00 BLASCHKO, JEFF VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55803 $100.00 BREDEHOFT, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55804 $100.00 CARLIN, JIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55805 $80.00 CHECCO, DARRICK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55806 $100.00 AUGUSTINE MEDICAL/MATT CUMERFO VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55807 $80.00 COOK, BRENT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55808 $100.00 CUTSHAW, AL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55809 $100.00 DZIUK; BRENT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55810 $100.00 FRANSEN, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55811 $100.00 GILBERTSON, ERIK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55812 $100.00 HAANSTAD, JOHN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55813 $100.00 HANDLEY, BILL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55814 $100.00 HANSON, JOEL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55815 $100.00 HANSON, TATE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55816 $100.00 HARTWICK, JOE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55817 $100.00 HALLETT, TODD VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55818 $100.00 HJERPE, ADAM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55819 $100.00 HOAG, BILL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55820 $100.00 HUNTER, DON VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55821 $100.00 JOHNSON, DOUG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55822 $100.00 JOHNSON, KEVIN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55823 $100.00 KILONER, KEVIN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55824 $100.00 KING, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55825 $100.00 KNUDTSON, STEVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55826 $100.00 LEBON, CHUCK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55827 $100.00 LICN, RICHARD VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55828 $80.00 LOEHRS, LEE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55829 $100.00 MARBLE, TIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55830 $100.00 MILLER, JON VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55831 $80.00 MILLER, MIKE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBAT.T, J Prr- COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 55832 $100.00 MORAN, PATRICK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55833 $100.00 MURPHY, GREG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55834 $80.00 MYERS, MARK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55835 $100.00 MYERS, STEPHEN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55836 $100.00 NASH, KEVIN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55837 $80.00 NESSA, ROB VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55838 $100.00 OSWALD, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55839 $100.00 RICE, DEAN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55840 $100.00 ROLES, JON VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55841 $100.00 ROQUETTE, K VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55842 $100.00 SANDNESS, MIKE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55843 $80.00 SCHANSBERG, TODD VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55844 $60.00 SERGIACOMI, ROBERT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55845 $100.00 SLATTERY, BRYAN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55846 $100.00 STANFORD, LEO VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55847 $100.00 TURENNE, JOE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55848 $100.00 WARD, REED VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55849 $100.00 WILTON, JIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55850 $100.00 YEE, GREG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55851 $100.00 YOUNG, ERIC VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55852 $100.00 ALBINSON, DANIEL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55853 $180.00 ALLENSWORTH, DREW VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55854 $1,042.21 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 55855 $80.00 BADENHOP, ROGER VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55856 $24.00 BCA CJIS ID UNIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 55857 $48.00 BCA CJIS ID UNIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 55858 $250.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55859 $80.00 BENNER, LARRY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55860 $100.00 BERENGUER, DENISE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55861 $100.00 BIERBAUM, RANDY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55862 $100.00 BJORLIN, CURT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55863 $100.00 BLAIR, SHARI VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55864 $15.00 BOWERS, JACK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55865 $20.00 BURKE, BRENDA VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55866 $15.00 CAMERON, ERIC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55867 $3,349.00 CARD SERVICES-BUSINESS CARD TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 55868 $100.00 CARRANE, ANDY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55869 $100.00 CASE, KAREN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55870 $1,074.55 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55871 $6,918.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55872 $100.00 DOLPH, WARREN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55873 $100.00 DOWNEY, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55874 $19,204.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55875 $100.00 EGESDALE, DAVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55876 $25.00 EICHENLAUB, RICHARD OR PEGGY KENNEL LICENSE FD 10 ORG 55877 $137.50 ELFSTROM, JOJO OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55878 $100.00 FARLEY, TIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55879 $63.75 FAURE, ERICA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55880 $10V.00 FLORIN, PAUL VIOLATION FEES SOFTRAT.T. 55881 $86.27 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CUMMINS/GRILL 55882 $100.00 FREIERMUTH, TROY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55883 $145.36 GORDON, WHITNEY MILEAGE AND PARKING DAY CAMP 55884 $100.00 GRIFFITH, TIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTRAT.T, 55885 $90.00 RARER, ANDREW OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55886 $100.00 HEALY, STEVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL Y COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 55887 $100.00 HOLTZ, KAREN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55888 $100.00 HUTCHINS, SCOTT VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55889 $12.50 JACOBSEN, KRISTEN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55890 $30.00 JAEGER, MATT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55891 $23.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55892 $30.00 JOHNSTONE, MARJI OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55893 $15.00 KISTNER, MATT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55894 $100.00 KLINGLER, GREG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55895 $100.00 KOEPPL, JIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55896 $80.00 LEGAN, DAVE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55897 $30.00 LEWIS, JASMINE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55898 $100.00 LIEBRENZ, DAVID VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55899 $106.25 LUSIAN, WALLY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55900 $6,800.50 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55901 $13.43 MAURS, TEALINA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55902 $100.00 MCGRUDER, MARK VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55903 $100.00 MCKEEVER, ANDY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55904 $100.00 MCMONIGAL, BILL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55905 $146.25 MEYER, NICOLE MILEAGE AND PARKING DAY CAMP 55906 $517.77 MIDDELTON, BRIAN INSURANCE GENERAL 55907 $878.95 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55908 $80.00 MILANO, DAVID VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55909 $80.00 MILLER, JOHN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55910 $4,332.24 MINNEGASCO GAS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 55912 $100.00 MITCHELL, ROB VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55913 $100.00 NELSON, JOHN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55914 $1.00 NELSON, PATRICIA SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES ADULT PROGRAM 55915 $100.00 NELSON, RON VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55916 $15.00 O'BRIEN, PAT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55917 $27.95 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55918 $37.00 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 55919 $60.00 PERRILL, JAY VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55920 $100.00 PETERSON, ALLEN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55921 $74.37 PLOSZAY, ANDREA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55922 $23.95 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55923 $100.00 RATHKE, DAVID VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55924 $15.00 REESE, DONNIE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55925 $100.00 SANDSTROM, TOM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55926 $100.00 SAUER, JOHN VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55927 $159.38 SAXTON, ELLIOT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55928 $65.31 SCHIMKE, BRANDON OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55929 $70.00 SCHIMKE, DERRICK OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55930 $35.63 SCHMIDT, ELLY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55931 $739,255.00 SHEEHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN DESIGN & CONST PW STORAGE FACILITY 55932 $100.00 SMALL, BILL VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55933 $100.00 SMITH, MITCH VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55934 $80.00 STAMPER, TED VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55935 $100.00 STENDER, KIM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55936 $12,077.90 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55937 $100.00 TRECKER, TOM VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55938 $6,513.75 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 55940 $100.00 VANDERVORSTE, GREG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55941 $20.00 VOLK, JEFF VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55942 $100.00 WEBSTER, BRUCE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55943 $100.00 WINDHORST, MARIE VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 1 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 55944 $157.15 WINE COMPANY, THE BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55945 $15.00 WOOD, MATT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55946 $80.00 ZAUN, TREVOR VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55947 $100.00 ZEMKE, CRAIG VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55948 $145.00 AMERICAN RED CROSS CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 55949 $5.00 BANGASSER, MARY JO RFND YOUTH SAILING POOL LESSONS 55950 $396.46 BEAULIEU, KATHY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55951 $489.71 CAMAS-SHIELY DIVISION GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE 55952 $5.00 CAUDILL, NANCY RFND YOUTH SAILING POOL LESSONS 55953 $75.00 HAYEN, LINDA RFND BRYANT LAKE DAY CAMP DAY CAMP 55954 $14.00 IYER, LATHA RFND BRYANT LAKE SLEEPOVER DAY CAMP 55955 $5,167.00 JASON-NORTHCO L.P. #1 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 55956 $10.00 KNOEDLER, SHEILA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 55957 $70.68 LANENBERG, CYNTHIA 0 FIRE 55958 $5.00 LYNCH, MIKE RFND YOUTH SAILING POOL LESSONS 55959 $126.74 MACRAE, ROD REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55960 $320.00 MACRAE, ROD INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55961 $62.43 MANN, TRIA MILEAGE AND PARKING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 55962 $9,608.74 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSU REPAIR& MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 55963 $5.00 MCMILLAN, LORI RFND YOUTH SAILING POOL LESSONS 55964 $5.00 NELSON, KATHY RFND YOUTH SAILING POOL LESSONS 55965 $8.75 NESLETT, STACEY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55966 $1.00 ORTNER, MARIKO ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS 55967 $320.00 OTTERNESS, RONALD INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55968 $3.62 PALKERT, BART RFND 1 SWIM LESSON POOL LESSONS 55969 $89.69 PETTY CASH RECORDING DOCUMENT FEE ENGINEERING DEPT 55970 $131.27 PETTY CASH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55971 $600.00 ROSSMAN, THOMAS ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 55972 $80.00 STARR, BRAD VIOLATION FEES SOFTBALL 55973 $840.00 STUKEL, JIM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 55974 $40.00 TEKIELA, STAN INSTRUCTOR SERVICE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55975 $5.00 TSAI, ALEXANDER RFND YOUTH SAILING POOL LESSONS 55976 $44.80 WERTS, SANDY MILEAGE AND PARKING REC SUPERVISOR 55977 $136.00 BCA CJIS ID UNIT PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM HUMAN RESOURCES 55978 $70.70 BUTCHER-YOUGHANS, SHERRY MILEAGE AND PARKING COUNCIL 55979 $192.16 CEMSTONE ASPHALT OVERLAY STREET MAINTENANCE 55980 $660.00 DAHLGREEN GOLF CLUB SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 55981 $220.00 FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 55983 $380.00 GFOA CONFERENCE. IN SERVICE TRAINING 55984 $28.75 JACOBSEN, KRISTEN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55985 $285.00 MILANO, DAVID ORGANIZED ATHLETICS FEES SOFTBALL 55986 $52.50 PETERSON, ALAINA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES TEEN WORK PROGRAM 55987 $948.10 REBS MARKETING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER ACCOUNTING 55988 $70.00 TIMBER LODGE STEAK HOUSE REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES ADULT OPEN GYM 55989 $50.00 TORNO, JIM OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 55990 $168.45 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE GENERAL 55991 $2,916.56 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE GENERAL 55992 $1,000..00 WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 55993 $188.17 FREY, LYNDELL MILEAGE AND PARKING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 55994 $25.50 GARTON, RAPHAELA RFND SWIM LESSON OAK POINT LESSONS 55995 $195.00 GRAPHIC IMPRINTS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 55996 $51.00 HAYES, RUTH RFND SWIM LESSONS POOL LESSONS 55997 $131,846.00 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BUILDING CUB FOOD STORE CONSTRUCTION 55998 $395.00 IPMA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 55999 $25.50 LAMBERT, PAT RFND SWIM LESSONS POOL LESSONS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 56000 $200.00 MCGUIRE, CHARLIE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SUNBONNET DAYS 56001 $25.50 MCPHEE, BONNIE RFND SWIM LESSONS OAK POINT LESSONS 56002 $183.18 RADISSON ARROWWOOD TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 56003 $40.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPT OF COM LICENSES & TAXES POLICE 56004 $41.00 THOMAS, JOAN RFND SKATING LESSONS ICE ARENA 56005 $25.50 WAGNER, MARGARET RFND SWIM LESSONS POOL LESSONS 56006 $42.00 WURR, WENDY RFND SOCCER CAMP YOUTH ATHLETICS 56007 $19.50 ZIESKE, CAROL RFND SWIM LESSONS POOL LESSONS 56008 $617.82 FERRELLGAS MOTOR FUELS ICE ARENA 56009 $44.00 JOHNSON, CATHIE ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 56010 $1,111.48 NILSSON, BETH INSTRUCTOR SERVICE ICE ARENA 56011 $282.00 WORLDCLASS TRAVEL SCHOOLS POLICE 56012 $109.57 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 56013 $178.37 AARCEE REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 56014 $2,119.12 ABRA INC SCHOOLS FIRE 56015 $8,014.13 ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS TRAILS 56016 $1,556.12 AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS MILLER PK K32 56017 $295.47 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY COMPANY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56018 $272.50 AMERICAN MGMT ASSOC TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 56019 $912.50 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 56020 $21.57 AQUA ENGINEERING INC EQUIPMENT PARTS STORM DRAINAGE 56021 $73.14 ARENA SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 56022 $160.00 ARMA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 56023 $665.63 ASPEN REACH EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT RENTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 56024 $4,690.20 AVR INC ASPHALT OVERLAY STREET MAINTENANCE 56026 $13,716.35 B & F DISTRIBUTING MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56027 $228.82 B & S TOOLS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER METER REPAIR • 56028 $480.00 BACHMANS CREDIT DEPT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56029 $208.81 BACONS ELECTRIC COMPANY CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56030 $814.28 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56031 $1,900.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION TOBACCO PRODUCTS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56033 $30.00 BETH AND MORLEY BURNETT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 56034 $950.00 BLOOMINGTON, CITY OF KENNEL SERVICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 56035 $42.28 BMS...INTEGRATED OFFICE TECHNO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 56036 $270.00 BRANDT, LEE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 56037 $2,075.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION DESIGN & CONST STARING LK PLSTUCT K20 56038 $168.59 BROADWAY AWARDS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SR CTR OPERATIONS 56039 $2,479.00 BROWN, PAUL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 56040 $410.14 BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES CONTRACTED REPAIR& MAINT FIRE 56041 $36.00 C R GIBSON CO, THE OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 56042 $37.62 CANTON LUMBER COMPANY BUILDING MATERIALS STARING LAKE 56043 $1,372.80 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 56044 $2,722.64 CARLSON REFRIGERATION CO FURNITURE & FIXTURES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 56045 $995.71 CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 56046 $590.88 CASWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORAT TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 56047 $167.26 CEMSTONE BUILDING MATERIALS STARING LAKE 56048 $1,597.26 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56051 $28.70 CHANHASSEN LAWN AND SPORTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 56052 $250.88 CHECK EQUIPMENT & MAINTENANCE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS 56053 $159.75 CHUCKS BAGS SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 56054 $10,755.00 CLAREYS INC OTHER EQUIPMENT SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56055 $5,320.00 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC ASPHALT OVERLAY STREET MAINTENANCE 56056 $261.99 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC ASPHALT OVERLAY STREET MAINTENANCE 56057 $86.30 COPY CHECK CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 56058 $37.50 CULLIGAN WATER WATER SOFTNER OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 9 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 56059 $11,687.70 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56060 $86.27 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 56061 $205.01 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS SEWER LIFTSTATION 56062 $20.24 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56063 $283.46 DELEGARD TOOL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56064 $41,040.15 DON RIHN TRANSPORT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIME SLUDGE 56065 $3,222.00 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56066 $357.00 DUSTCOATING INC DUST COATING GRAVEL ROADS-DUST CONTROL 56067 $220.95 DYNA SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56068 $19,928.02 E F JOHNSON CO OTHER EQUIPMENT POLICE 56069 $170.70 EAGLE ENGRAVING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 56070 $284.36 EARL F ANDERSEN INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 56071 $181.06 ECOLAB INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EPCC MAINTENANCE 56072 $17.00 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 56073 $60.00 EDEN PRAIRIE NEWS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 56074 $320.00 EDINA, CITY OF CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE ' 56075 $2,220.00 EKLUNDS TREE AND BRUSH DISPOSA WASTE DISPOSAL TREE REMOVAL 56076 $1,806.88 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56077 $132.12 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56078 $1,547.82 ERICKSEN ELLISON AND ASSOCIATE DESIGN & CONST COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC 56079 $984.06 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC* REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 56080 $4,399.80 FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56081 $121.33 FERRELLGAS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 56082 $364.75 FILTRATION SYSTEMS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56083 $3,230.00 FINLEY BROS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES RILEY LAKE 56084 $424.13 FISHER SCIENTIFIC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56085 $62.50 FLAGHOUSE INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DAY CAMP 56086 $352.22 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56087 $86.27 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CUMMINS/GRILL 56088 $640.00 FREY, MARY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 56089 $149.10 FUN SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TASTE OF PRAIRIE 56090 $149.51 GAMETIME REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES RED ROCK PARK 56091 $569.60 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 56092 $45.30 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN OFFICE SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 56093 $167.35 GETTMAN COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 56094 $318.50 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56095 $5,643.00 GOPHER STATE SEALCOAT INC SEAL COATING CONTRACTED PARK MAINTENANCE 56096 $85.39 GREG LARSON SPORTS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES TOUCH FOOTBALL 56097 $394.67 GRIGGS COOPER & CO TOBACCO PRODUCTS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56098 $288.59 GROVE NURSERY CENTER LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL REFORESTATION 56099 $4,658.78 GWS INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS ARTS 56100 $120.50 HACH COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56101 $16,353.25 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON DESIGN & CONST STARING LK PLSTUCT K20 56102 $2,533.72 HARDRIVES INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS SCENIC HEIGHTS ROAD 56103 $75.00 HARMON FULL SERVICE GROUP REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 56104 $252.00 HENDERSON, JOSH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 56105 $795.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 56106 $52.14 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 56107 $2,080.00 HONEYWELL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56108 $124.25 HONIG'S WHISTLE SHOP REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES VOLLEYBALL 56109 $322.25 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS RENTALS FIRE 56110 $516.66 INDUSTRIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56111 $28.79 INLAND TRUCK PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56112 $81.04 INTERNATIONAL SUNPRINTS INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS YOUTH ATHLETICS 56113 $398.21 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT.MAINTENANCE 10 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 56114 $58.56 J CRAFT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56115 $122.91 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 56116 $204.00 JERDE, BRENDA OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 56117 $524.12 JPI CONSULTANTS DEPOSITS ESCROW 56118 $87.21 KNOX BUILDING MATERIALS BUILDING MATERIALS - ROUND LAKE 56119 $89.37 KOLL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STREET LIGHTING 56120 $228.78 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC* OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56121 $974.00 LAIDLAW ENV SVCS WASTE DISPOSAL HIDDEN PONDS RES 56122 $2,298.97 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56123 $2,343.00 LANO EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56124 $49,963.25 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS WORKMANS COMP INS BENEFITS 56125 $115.00 LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP PAYING AGENT HRA 2ND SHEET ICE 56126 $15.00 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC* DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56127 $171.40 M-C INDUSTRIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 56128 $50.85 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 56129 $153.30 MCGLYNN BAKERIES MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 56130 $180.00 MCGREGOR, RANDY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 56131 $951.79 MCNEILUS STEEL INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56132 $184.83 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 56133 $505.88 METRO SALES INCORPORATED CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 56134 $478.40 METROPOLITAN FORD CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56135 $28.76 MIDAS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56136 $334,269.19 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS VALLEY VIEW & CO RD 4 56138 $363.84 MIDWEST TELETRON INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 56139 $37,653.15 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS SUNNYBROOK RD W HOMEWARD HILLS 56140 $20.64 MINNCOMM PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 56141 $81.75 MINNEAPOLIS EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56142 $70.39 MINNESOTA CONWAY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 56143 $194.00 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT* REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56144 $227.45 MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 56145 $397.03 MIRACLE RECREATION OF MINNESOT BUILDING MATERIALS RED ROCK PARK 56146 $106.81 MOORE MEDICAL CORP SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 56147 $250.77 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 56148 $883.35 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES FIRE 56149 $32.00 NEWTEKNIQUES TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 56150 $1,541.19 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56152 $400.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT B & I PAYMENTS 56153 $49.91 OHLIN SALES MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT FIRE 56154 $127.05 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56155 $196.70 P&H WAREHOUSE SALES INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE 56156 $23.38 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 56157 $387.00 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HEALTHSYS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 56158 $2,047.20 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STORM DRAINAGE 56159 $334.30 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 56160 $267.65 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 56161 $1,711.93 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT SEWER LIFTSTATION 56162 $2,712.50 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT RENTAL STORM DRAINAGE ' 56163 $514.17 PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STREET MAINTENANCE 56164 $772.92 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER COMMUNITY SERVICES 56165 $648.16 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL EPCC MAINTENANCE 56166 $124.75 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL 56167 $601.95 RAINBOW FOODS - CHARGES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 56168 $98.14 RESPOND SYSTEMS* OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL 56169 $207.04 RICHARDS ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING ASPHALT STREET MAINTENANCE 56170 $11.20 RICHFIELD, CITY OF TRANSPORTATION ADULT PROGRAM i I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (14:29) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 56171 $54.62 RITZ CAMERA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TREE DISEASE 56172 $3,666.26 RMR SERVICES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 56173 $33.60 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56174 $298.00 RUFF-CUT SA ON LAND TREE DISEASE 56175 $2,124.00 SCHULTZ, WILBUR OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 56176 $1,035.10 SEGAL WHOLESALE INC TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 56177 $182.65 SISINNI FOOD SERVICE MISCELLANEOUS IN SERVICE TRAINING 56178 $458.03 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56179 $334.50 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 56180 $742.32 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56181 $271.42 SOUTHWEST LAWN MAINTENANCE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES mask SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56182 $100.00 SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION ADULT PROGRAM 56183 $489.10 SPORTS WORLD USA INC REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SOFTBALL 56184 $22,837.45 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TH212/SHADY OAK/FLYING CLOUD 56185 $1,983.43 ST CROIX RECREATION CO INC BUILDING MATERIALS RILEY LAKE 56186 $29.20 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 56187 $1,127.53 STONE MOUNTAIN CARPET OUTLET OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1995 REHAB 56042 56188 $854.50 STREICHERS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 56189 $43.67 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56190 $2,044.80 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56191 $117.79 SUN INDUSTRIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 56192 $70,031.65 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION DESIGN & CONST STARING LK PLSTUCT K20 56193 $125.00 SWEDLUNDS WASTE DISPOSAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 56194 $1,604.55 SYSTEM CONTROL SERVICES CONTRACTED_EQUIP REPAIR WATER WELL #11 56195 $188.42 • TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 56196 $174.66 TIERNEY BROS INC SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNS 56197 $3,000.00 TKDA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56198 $292.62 TNEMEC COMPANY INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56199 $100.36 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY EQUIPMENT RENTAL TASTE OF PRAIRIE 56200 $212.94 TOTAL REGISTER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 56201 $11.72 TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56202 $4,819.75 TRAUT WELLS CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WELL #3 56203 $605.00 TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SEWER LIFTSTATION 56204 $58.16 TRIARCO OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DAY CAMP 56205 $1,696.22 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL RICE MARSH LAKE PARK 56206 $64.50 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 56207 $457.15 TWIN CITY SEED CO BUILDING MATERIALS RED ROCK PARK 56208 $120.75 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 56209 $89.85 US CAVALRY CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 56210 $4,884.39 US FILTER/WATERPRO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 56212 $4,535.45 VALLEY RICH CO INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56213 $585.62 VESSCO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56214 $68.71 W W GRAINGER INC CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 56215 $579.89 WARNING LIGHTS OF MINNESOTA REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 56216 $386.69 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 56217 $150.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 56218 $68.37 WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CENTER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 56219 $1,500.00 WESTACOTT, JOEL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE CONCERT 56220 $3,933.44 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CSAH 1 SIGNAL 56221 $415.39 X-ERGON REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56222 $255.02 YALE INCORPORATED CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 56223 $73.22 ZACKS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES STORM DRAINAGE 56224 $90.00 ZIOLA, BRAD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 56225 $63,438.59 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS $1,851,736.87* '4 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 09-SEP-1997 (15:00) DIVISION TOTAL CITY MANAGER $5.20 HUMAN RESOURCES $1.95 FACILITIES $0.32 POLICE $30.97 PARK MAINTENANCE $23.70 FLEET SERVICES $731.18 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $340.30 COMMUNITY CENTER $3,593.73 BEACHES $125.12 YOUTH RECREATION $312.05 SPECIAL EVENTS $1.88 OAK POINT POOL $478.58 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $1,185,020.80 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $807,865.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $263,548.91 CITY CENTER $204.36 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $13,065.13 PRAIRIEVIEW $19,343.51 CUB FOODS $9,579.93 PRESERVE -$680.23 WATER DEPT $10,477.76 $2,314,070.15* is COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 09-SEP-1997 (15:00) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 62 $102,958.34 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 63 $58,373.41 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYEES SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG 64 $58,373.41 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYERS SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG 65 $43,843.19 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENU STATE TAXES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 66 $458.00 MN DEPT OF REVENUE MOTOR YUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 67 $57,178.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENU SALES TAX PAYABLE FD 10 ORG 68 $1,185,020.80 KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 69 $521,957.50 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. INTEREST B & I PAYMENTS 70 $154,167.50 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY INTEREST B & I PAYMENTS 71 $131,740.00 FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC INTEREST 92 PARK B & I $2,314,070.15* • lL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: Sept. 9, 1997 Section: Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department: PRNRJA" City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee Item No.: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recommended Changes to the City Facility Use Recreation Services Policies for Use by the School District RECOMMENDATION: The City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee recommends the following changes to the City facility use policies for facilities used by the School District. City staff supports the recommendations outlined in this memorandum and request that the proposed changes go into effect January 1, 1998. Facility Use • The School District would not be charged a facility rental fee with the exception of the Community Center facilities (i.e., ice arenas, pool and racquetball courts). • The School District would be charged direct staffing costs (i.e., warming house attendant, park attendant, etc.). • The School District would not be charged for use of City audio visual equipment, if requested equipment is available on site (i.e., Heritage Rooms, Senior Center, Community Center, etc.). • The School District would be charged for use of City audio visual equipment when using the Garden Room. Fees and Charges Refer to the attachment titled Proposed Fees and Charges for 1998 for further details. Additional information is provided regarding the projected fees and charges for 1998. (attachments) Non Duplication of Programs The committee discussed the issue of duplication of programs offered by the Recreation Division and the Community Education Department. It was concluded that certain programs may be considered both recreational and educational(arts, drama, music, dance, family programs, preschool programs, and fitness&health). It was agreed by the committee that these "gray areas" would remain as such, with the following recommendations: • Reconfirm which organization offers which program areas and provide further definition of"gray areas", if possible. 1 • If we agreed to continue offering similar programs in some areas, then make sure that they are offered: 1. at different times and/or weeks within the quarter, 2. target different age groups, and 3. in our own facilities. • Agree to bring up new program ideas that might be in the "gray areas" with the other organization's coordinator(s) before making final commitments to teachers and talk it through until both parties are satisfied with the agreement. BACKGROUND: In 1996,the City Council requested staff to evaluate the fees that the City charges the School District for use of facilities and vice versa,to determine if we are spending administrative time charging each other for facilities that in turn raises the cost to use those facilities by residents. The City staff and School District staff met on several occasions to review fees and charges and to compare Eden Prairie policy with other school districts and cities. As a result of the discussions between the City and the School District staff regarding use of facilities, as well as continuing to attempt to eliminate duplication of services, the School District staff and City staff proposed guidelines for City/School use of facilities. (attachment) A joint Facilities Advisory Committee consisting of community representatives and staff was established on October 30, 1996 to review operational guidelines and policies, review semi annual financial charges, and address other questions that would be of mutual concern. The committee has met a total of seven times to discuss issues such as facility use policies, fees and charges, and non duplication of programs. Please refer to attachment titled 1996-1997 Accomplishments for further details on the committee's activities. At the last City and School Facility Advisory Committee meeting, the following motion was made: MOTION: Steppat moved, seconded by Gaines, to recommend to the City Council and the School Board the changes in the fee schedule as proposed. Motion carries 5-0. At the School Board meeting scheduled for September 10, 1997, Jeanne Zetah, Director of Community Education Services, will present the proposed changes in Facility Use Policies recommended by the committee for use by the City of Eden Prairie. (attachment) RATIONALE: The largest source of revenue from the School District to the City of Eden Prairie is for rental of facilities at the Eden Prairie Community Center. The Community Center was constructed after the passage of a bond referendum in 1979. During the promotion of this bond referendum, the City 2 2 Council committed to the residents that the goal of the facility would always be to meet operating costs, and that the City would charge all users, including the School District, for use of the facility in order to keep the tax subsidy for operating this facility as low as possible. The City will only be charging the School District for use of other facilities if there are direct costs to the City involved. For example, if the School District wishes to use a park shelter and the City contracts with individuals for opening and closing the park shelter, the School District is only charged whatever that contract cost is to the City. The School District has developed fees for use of various facilities over the years. These fees are reviewed by the Community Education Council and approved by the School Board. The School Board's main attempt is also to cover the cost to operate the various facilities that are used by citizens. CLOSING COMMENTS: The Eden Prairie School District and the City of Eden Prairie have had a long history of cooperation and an excellent working relationship. The guidelines for City/School use of facilities and the City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee have helped ensure continuation of this great working relationship. LH:mdd Attachments: Proposed Fees and Charges for 1998 Guidelines for City/School Use of Facilities 1996-1997 Accomplishments of the City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee Memorandum to the Eden Prairie School Board from Jeanne Zetah, Director of Community Education Services,Dated September 4, 1997 RE: Proposed Changes in Facility Use Policies Projected Fees and Charges for 1998 (City Facilities Used by the School District) Projected Fees and Charges for 1998 (School District Facilities Used by the City) c: Jeanne Zetah, Director of Community Education Services Steve Schultz, High School Activities Director Barb Cross, Facilities Manager Sept9.memo/Laurie 1997 3 Memorandum To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Through: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources From: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services Date: September 9, 1997 Subject: City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee Recommended Changes to the City Facility Use Polices for Use by the School District RECOMMENDATION: The City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee recommends the following changes to the City facility use policies for facilities used by the School District. City staff supports the recommendations outlined in this memorandum and request that the proposed changes go into effect January 1, 1998. Facility Use • The School District would not be charged a facility rental fee with the exception of the Community Center facilities (i.e., ice arenas, pool and racquetball courts). • The School District would be charged direct staffing costs (i.e., warming house attendant, park attendant, etc.). • The School District would not be charged for use of City audio visual equipment, if requested equipment is available on site (i.e., Heritage Rooms, Senior Center, Community Center, etc.). • The School District would be charged for use of City audio visual equipment when using the Garden Room. Fees and Charges Refer to the attachment titled Proposed Fees and Charges for 1998 for further details. Additional information is provided regarding the projected fees and charges for 1998. (attachments) Non Duplication of Programs The committee discussed the issue of duplication of programs offered by the Recreation Division and the Community Education Department. It was concluded that certain programs may be considered 1 both recreational and educational(arts, drama, music, dance, family programs, preschool programs, and fitness&health). It was agreed by the committee that these "gray areas" would remain as such, with the following recommendations: • Reconfirm which organization offers which program areas and provide further definition of"gray areas", if possible. • If we agreed to continue offering similar programs in some areas, then make sure that they are offered: 1. at different times and/or weeks within the quarter, 2. target different age groups, and 3. in our own facilities. • Agree to bring up new program ideas that might be in the "gray areas" with the other organization's coordinator(s) before making final commitments to teachers and talk it through until both parties are satisfied with the agreement. BACKGROUND: In 1996,the City Council requested staff to evaluate the fees that the City charges the School District for use of facilities and vice versa,to determine if we are spending administrative time charging each other for facilities that in turn raises the cost to use those facilities by residents. The City staff and School District staff met on several occasions to review fees and charges and to compare Eden Prairie policy with other school districts and cities. As a result of the discussions between the City and the School District staff regarding use of facilities, as well as continuing to attempt to eliminate duplication of services, the School District staff and City staff proposed guidelines for City/School use of facilities. (attachment) A joint Facilities Advisory Committee consisting of community representatives and staff was established on October 30, 1996 to review operational guidelines and policies, review semi annual financial charges, and address other questions that would be of mutual concern. The committee has met a total of seven times to discuss issues such as facility use policies, fees and charges, and non duplication of programs. Please refer to attachment titled 1996-1997 Accomplishments for further details on the committee's activities. At the last City and School Facility Advisory Committee meeting, the following motion was made: MOTION: Steppat moved, seconded by Gaines, to recommend to the City Council and the School Board the changes in the fee schedule as proposed. Motion carries 5-0. At the School Board meeting scheduled for September 10, 1997, Jeanne Zetah, Director of Community Education Services, will present the proposed changes in Facility Use Policies recommended by the committee for use by the City of Eden Prairie. (attachment) 2 S RATIONALE: The largest source of revenue from the School District to the City of Eden Prairie is for rental of facilities at the Eden Prairie Community Center. The Community Center was constructed after the passage of a bond referendum in 1979. During the promotion of this bond referendum, the City Council committed to the residents that the goal of the facility would always be to meet operating costs, and that the City would charge all users, including the School District, for use of the facility in order to keep the tax subsidy for operating this facility as low as possible. The City will only be charging the School District for use of other facilities if there are direct costs to the City involved. For example, if the School District wishes to use a park shelter and the City contracts with individuals for opening and closing the park shelter, the School District is only charged whatever that contract cost is to the City. The School District has developed fees for use of various facilities over the years. These fees are reviewed by the Community Education Council and approved by the School Board. The School Board's main attempt is also to cover the cost to operate the various facilities that are used by citizens. CLOSING COMMENTS: The Eden Prairie School District and the City of Eden Prairie have had a long history of cooperation and an excellent working relationship. The guidelines for City/School use of facilities and the City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee have helped ensure continuation of this great working relationship. LH:mdd Attachments: Proposed Fees and Charges for 1998 Guidelines for City/School Use of Facilities 1996-1997 Accomplishments of the City and School Facility Use Advisory Committee Memorandum to the Eden Prairie School Board from Jeanne Zetah, Director of Community Education Services,Dated September 4, 1997 RE: Proposed Changes in Facility Use Policies Projected Fees and Charges for 1998 (City Facilities Used by the School District) Projected Fees and Charges for 1998 (School District Facilities Used by the City) c: Jeanne Zetah, Director of Community Education Services Steve Schultz, High School Activities Director Barb Cross, Facilities Manager S ept9.memo/Lau ri e 19 97 3 CITY AND SCHOOL FACILITY USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1998 CITY FACILITIES USED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT Community Center Facflityg:;:inspipygotiFttgmeProposed Fee for Comments 1998 Ice Arenas $117.50/hour $130/hour (prime time) • A$12.50/hour increase for prime time. (prime time) $95/hour(non prime time) $47.50/hour (High School Phy Ed) Pool $35/hour $50/hour • Fee charged for whole pool. • A$15/hour increase in the pool rental rate. Racquetball Courts $10/hour/court $10/hour/court • No change in fee recommended. Other City Facilities Facility Current Peeiiia!irt0PosactOttOMANNIMinintiliNg1PROIM1998 EBBIESEItgl Outdoor Center $25 flat fee plus$20/hour $30 flat fee • Currently, the $20/hour facility rental is applied towards the$25 flat fee for staffing. • The$20/hour fee would be eliminated. • The flat fee would be increased by$5/hour. Staring Lake Sliding Hill $10/hour $10/hour • No change in fee recommended. Forest Hills&Prairie View -0- -0- • No fee charged. Warming Houses Staring Lake Park Shelter, $65/half day $30 flat fee • Pay direct staffing costs only. Round Lake Park Building, $120/full day • Fee decreased by$35-$90/use. Homeward Hills Park Building, Miller Park Shelter Round Lake Park Pavilion $65/half day -0- • Staffing not required. $120/full day • Fee eliminated completely. City Center Heritage -0- -0- • There is a setup charge of$35 for a quarter Rooms space,$50 for half ofthe space,and$100 for the whole Heritage Room,if special setup is required. • No change in fee recommended. Round Lake Park & -0- -0- • No fee charged Holasek Tennis Courts Staring Lake Amphitheatre $50/hour -0- • The$50/hour fee would be eliminated. • Staffing not required. • If use of sound system is required, a $20/hour fee will be required. 98fees/Laurie97 GUIDELINES FOR CITY/SCHOOL USE OF FACILITIES 1. Philosophical Position The Eden Prairie School District and the City of Eden Prairie generally represent the same constituencies and, as a result, each governmental unit promotes the use of their respective facilities by the community in order to maximize the use of public-owned facilities. 2. Concept for Intergovernmental Cooperation It shall be the general philosophy and concept of the Eden Prairie School District and the City of Eden Prairie to provide the facilities of each governmental unit at no charge to each other when the functions are for the usage of the Eden Prairie community residents except that when: a. the school district uses the ice facilities and swimming facilities at the Community Center for educational purposes, the school district will continue to pay the city for these functions as outlined in mutually accepted agreements. b. the City of Eden Prairie and the Eden Prairie School District have joint power agreements wherein the joint power agreements will prevail. c. Direct operating expenses, such as staffing costs, are incurred by either governmental unit,the costs shall be passed on to the user. Community groups and governmental usages shall be treated identically by the respective policies of each governmental unit. 3. Financial A financial summary of facility usage charges shall be prepared semiannually on June 30 and December 31 by each governmental unit. 4. Non-Duplication of Services Each governmental unit shall work cooperatively to eliminate duplication of services and programming. The City of Eden Prairie shall provide recreationally-oriented programs, and the school district shall provide educationally-oriented programs. 5. Joint Facilities Advisory Committee A joint facilities advisory committee consisting of community representatives and staff shall be established to review operational guidelines and policies, review semiannual financial charges, and address other questions that would be of mutual concern. It is suggested to have approximately six to eight citizen members plus one staff member each from the city and school district as ex-officio members. GuideFacBob96 September 5, 1996 1996-1997 ACCOMPLISHMENTS CITY AND SCHOOL FACILITY USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE rAsi( TIME LINE STATUS REPORT • Form Advisory Committee October. 30, &November 20, 1997 Task Accomplished • Establish Mission/Purpose • Identify Issues of Concern • Develop a Committee Work Plan Review the Facility Use Policies and January 15,March 19,April 16 and June • The committee reviewed both the City Charges for the City& School District 18, 1997 and School District Facility Use Policies and Charges for 1996. • The committee provided feedback back to the School District regarding the 800 Series Policies on Facility Use,and the proposed changes to the City relative to the new guidelines. • The committee reviewed the proposed changes to the City Facility Use Policies and Charges regarding School District use of City facilities. Discuss Community Pool Issues and January 15 and March 19, 1997 • The committee was informed about the Concerns air quality and water quality issues identified at the Community Center pool,possible solutions to the situation and estimated costs. Funding options were discussed. • The Joint Powers Agreement Between the School District and the City Regarding Oak Point Pool was discussed. • The committee discussed maximizing the use of both community pools. Memorandum of Understanding March 19 and April 16, 1997 The committee reviewed and invited input to the draft of the Memorandum of Understanding about City and School District property. Addition of New Facilities March 19 and June 18, 1997 The committee provided feedback to proposed School District facilities such as the Performing Arts Center and the Activities Center. Non Duplication of Programs March 16, 1997 The committee provided feedback on the staff recommendation to resolve non duplication of programs between the City and the School District. Senior Center June 18, 1997 The committee will discuss fees and charges to the School District for the use of City facilities,and the development of a Facility Use Policy for the Senior Center. TASK ktVS .•••••-•-•-••••••-•.•—••••••••••.•••••••••••-••••••••••••••.••••••••-- ..... Review Charges for Facility Use June 18, 1997 The committee will determine the process and time line for review of the 1997-98 charges for facilities. Recommend to the City Council and the August 20, 1997 Recommendation scheduled to be presented School Board the changes in the fee to the School Board on September 10, 1997 schedule as proposed. and the City Council September 16, 1997. Discuss School District referendum August 20, 1997 Task accomplished scheduled for September 9, 1997. AccomplisblLaurie97 • September 9, 1997 10 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 4, 1997 TO: School Board FROM: Jeanne Zetah RE: Proposed Changes in Facility Use Policies The City School Use of Facilities Advisory Committee recommends the following changes in School Policies for Use by the City of Eden Prairie: 1. Rental rates will not be charged - except for computer rooms for which all groups pay. 2. Adult programs will be charged a portion of the costs for building supervisors during regular duty hours. (For the 1997-98 school year the rate of 50% will be used. After tracking single and multiple uses, this rate may be adjusted annually.) If the city has multiple activities in the building at the same time, the staffing will be charged once. 3. Youth programs will not be charged rent or building supervisor costs during regular duty hours. 4. Regular duty hours for most groups will remain as 6-10 p.m. Monday through Friday (on days when school is held) and 8-5 Saturday during the school year. We will riot charge the city at a higher rate if hours extend to 10:30 on weeknights or if they start at 7:45 a.m. on Saturdays. Summer day hours are 7:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m. on weekdays and evening hours of 6-10 p.m. are restricted to one building each night. Workshop days, winter and spring breaks, etc. are non-school days, therefore non- regular duty hours/days. 5. The costs for building supervisors on Sundays and non-school weekdays will be at regular rates. We will monitor the number of times that another paying group overlaps with city Sunday usage and consider a reduction to the Sunday charges at the end of the year. If other district staff such as custodians or food service cooks are required for special events, the rates for those staff will be according to published rates. Air conditioning will be charged in the summer. 6. To cut confusion and duplication, city programs which are similar to district programs will not be scheduled in district sites. (Ex: city programs in watercolor painting or dance will not be scheduled in a school.) The advisory committee will help to clarify the boundaries between who offers what. •These new rates will go into effect starting January 1, 1998. l I PROJECTED FEES&CHARGES FOR 1998 CITY FACILITIES USED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT , „..5. e:uwt;gMr..ra ; VP400'.. .PR'fPWWV Mg,.... SW.044.7%,,, . um ., ,,,,semilimmi.4.06,i,4:Poditekte„,:ftz:i0**2, ,.:A i .:01gVOK?r,1/2,1" ..? ,:iimink,,,,,,,,,..,_L.VM iy,,,...t•Mig...,Oitikiiiiiii§ilS VkittileftteAttm ops.ifiggikifigriiiiiimaiiiiiittfotosin04,v10',/"47,-i . • -,......•••••-•-•••-• --•:, ,.0,AggibLimav,,,,,,tytholiia NE:42trier*CP N.:Prvmiiii::m..:::,:,Ww;i0 iAig.ro''''IdlittominCa"...YU:Ire,,-'.....,5:7'...,..0.00w,' Meagengnagn MPNAMEM::PYON.501Mgr# .4..., ..p,,,,o4it....,.44of W'''wle iiii0 M‘Oingtg0-4,c,00,E t*Pi.4._.,i,.,..47vo g*".:4.0:e.m.4,,000.1,04;<*QAmmaA4.,,x,%,".,...' 911NUMORMNPMNsii.pkgnigi.:!; gg g..rtgiiiiiiitoilw litOgfikthAmt inimmmoTt MI*MOWNVKif*.41 SINigimmur---. k:0::::FiunOityngY::::E7 jvftlivg7ityiNiral::::::::01:00:roggamik..07m] .:giigiii:m x;:::::;:cs'84/->G-iiir"s 61:05;,•07!!!!!!!!:: , "MORMONS lagettnKti:g•Me•Ren 0- .;•-••••, f"..-507.40witirgig • Girl s Varsity sales. rime time ice Ice Arenas; Hockey Girl's Varsity MaglaggrW4.ff • The School District receives.iiwqm Varsity Games)gate VialiOtarr11#140 199 • receipts from 1996. 8 Cost willa and vdar yjlidelpi l.elnpdil aanyg5fill-ddiscount ticket timesc oautntth on n the Communitynonprime Center in Standard Size Rink Practices& Games)gate and Olympic Size Games at prime receipts from 1996. $24,690(Boy's&Girl's 111111.11111 . ratein i99 1998 Girl anorri He ibgehgiSninciihoog AlPpril 1 time rate $24 690(Boy s& PracticesPhy Ed(broomball)which would be$47.50/hour , ' Rink prVaarsctiityce)JV Hockey ow.:Ag.:::EmigainigIN • Girl's Hockey Girl's Varsity)JV 4,410:11MORAtila & Hockey Practice Rink#1&#2=$115/hour prime time 10-6110iiiiikiVia•igiN • 1997 rate beginning January 1: Rink#1&#2=$117.50/hour prime time Games .tadoelgt:45EILN:iga 1998 proposed rate beginning January 1: lififteagaliiag;•ii:,: ip: • 111 Rink 1111111111,11: $ 9 #1&5/h06r no#62 13 prime time imo prime e time,and laCtgir:Ok:MniME,' MIEMNISMINEEM • Cheerleaders S575 S575 ,, ,,tienfeeib Professional Wg.;;,:im•iiA:iigioi:04::::bii:iimiiiii: Line Practices , at prime time MBIONMINEMBWE rate $6,905 ;$006.1Mompniaig:, • Phy Ed; S6905 ••••••••„.....•,...............„......„..........„.„...... Broomball :ig.WiNegnoijoii.iiiii•,ii Melganignmaimid Nimmommigmamb :( ••': .'owiV :sxmiliiiiizommi.,* .:1::i.:.041Milalfttgi:i:Nlt :..R....MAMMOOMilgWOMIgit N/A for swim No fee S40(Track) itia;;:;::•k.x.1-;.j,,;1111111!..f70,111 • Te Scho District ol Edprograismgivwe a which chpowoolurlednbtael sra4t3etscunturoini9fo9r8the High 4f 4100(y044.;f0WPW* h School Phy l>,..,"..""" Community Center • High School $40(Track) teams or P.E. charged for $168 P.E. :MI'•%MiKAlegkai • $50/hour for the whole pool 1998. Pool Boy's&Girl's S168(P.E.) Swim Team& $7,160(LGT) agaRSORtgiAA P Diving Teams $5,389(Girls) 10/hr lifeguard for cano,eaufs0erat :57318609((GLGirTls)) group where no marina EPHS P.E. $5,558(Boys) ;10;74:1; ;;;:ii • The ool rental rate has been$35/hour for the whole pool since 1989. • High School $5,558(Boys) lifeguard is on $4,556(Syncro) Swim Team 4'7,,..:.•,:. ..,--„."-zow...,,m,,,,,p,m,.. k,f. ::.: -*Motal% Synchronized $4,556(Syncro) duty 0; .Ali k.e151044 V;f:alliAlogastio • High School ...04:::(4::•WOM.i:--,Wii* Phy Ed taggf:%014:40NSA•n• ',Olet0g.*850000A Program Ug IN 0,00150A; • High School f....(rv.4.r5'144 AA Track&Cross tottot*SKOAW . Country • • • . . • • is/i f ,..:,:,..::,.. /.:............,... ..:.:........ ...,. a ,,�,�,y E3tFte ibC' +a � � a Ttt_.... .;,,�ra "` >�a". ..>:._<....,...................,. . ..._,...,.. .:.. . ....,......... .�`eS.(`�t �.... <bees,. ltt.. t'' , : .. h eii .... �'�%„ //. %<. :�'�s,,,,.�I/ �/... �,:�:,./:i �,�/•,I„r.;ay c. ;�`.... . IIse_:........ .�. a �' , .ac ,. .. e n �:> oiHlftts►e�#3�.. €quit ,....,,,...: :. ,:,..:....,,,..;,.,..,. ..... �:../.:;.�,,.....<, „...,.,,.:....:.::...: .::: ...<. is �.'�„ .......... :.......f.. ....,.... ..i.............::,...:,. ... �:.:.. ..... , :�.i,;.�..;,v;,.:�.;;i�;::S;SY.::Y',YyGI.,�:�::%i: :.1":`:�/l!i '.%l. .... .. �. ..........,,r.. ............//.. ,....,,..is ,! ,.,, ..!,.;..,:;..,,.,....:,, fig.;,... ,>f., ,..., .,.�.i.l,.f.a..:.:::...., ../... f Community Center • Phy Ed Classes $3,420 -0- -0- $3,420 z:>= 3,21 >{ • $10/hour/court :50Racquetball Courts r{: :< ; Outdoor Center • Miscellaneous $160 0- 0- $160 //' % £ '_'>u' • Currently,the School District is charged the same fee as other City programs and '( >Ise at .0eaeh"£%3 group&i.e.,Athletic Associations. meetings ""``$`>`">°'`' • Currently,the$20/hour facility rental is applied towards the S25 flat fee `.?< for staffmg. iy %' :":€:ii>«is;1 • In 1998,the School District will be charged a flat fee of$30 to open %' andclose the facility. f di ty. :0.�"{:.:::.>::<.>: .:<:.; • Other City groups,i.e.,Athletic Associations are required to provide a i::'S:h:;G.F.; ;.;wf:;' $50 deposit No depositrequired aired b Y the School District. P StaringLake Sliding - - School District currently charged the same fee as other City• School District0 0 The stn isurren 1 h 0 -0 �>1£ ti'li'` Y Hill Parties i`` i ti . . ""`<`'':> is group&i.e. Athletic Associations. 1996 sliding hill :2< ift'V;<<>:; • In 1998,the School District will be charged$10/hour. canceled due to • OtherCi tygrou s i.e.,Athletic Associations are required to provide a poor weather. $50 deposit. No deposit required by the School District. Forest Hills& • School District - - -0- • Wa "n house keys are given to the school staff for free use of the trtct -0 0 0 rmr Prairie View Parties warming houses December-March. WarmingHouses <3 Lake Staring L ke ParkSchoolsamefee as rut District 0The School District is currentlycharged the other City tot 65/half0 $65$ gday Shelter,Round Lake Parties $120/full day (I uset;at S3 each)l; ; groups,i.e.Athletic Associations,which is S65/half day or S 120i full Park Buildin , da . g Y Homeward Hillsflat 1998 the School District willbe charged a fee of 30 too en f�> In h 1 $ '> Park Building, . and close the facility. g, 7 ar.7 Miller Park Shelter :;</'<:'S{> H3:o:: are required to provide a ,;t...�...�� Other City groups,i.e.,Athletic Associations =lF` $50 deposit. No depositrequired bythe School District. O< ;;' P Po Round Lake Park • School District $65/half day0- 0- 0- r`i>>>'>%<%:>f' <« �%'. • The School District is currentlychar ed the same fee as other City g <'z% " 0 Pavilion Parties $120/full day �<>f��<, �1;��;;�f ��� groups,i.e.,Athletic Associations,which is$65/half day or$120/full /l. :f!%/,.:!v day . %-<f<1:itr-'„«>////'/ '`,' • Other Cityu s,i.e.,Athletic Associations are required to provide a ::' gro P 4 yf`�>t >:•.i $50 deposit. No deposit is required by the School District. %/ %/4 tariE irai� • The Round Lake Park pavilion will be available to the School District in 'ss<'''r r : s vl,. 1998 at no charge(staffing not required). . ..i:i.:i.• :,.i...,' ai,:I..,,iii..'.:'. 3 :. . .:.....:::.. :.. .i: ..i,.::f.'.iisi....::.,:,i v. .. ...4.,.... ............... ........ .»,.....� .:....:.......,. «.,..,...:.:.,....rn..,:..::,::.a.,:».::,............:.f....,....:.:�.....,...»::::»::...,.:::.......,....:.:,.:::: .�..�»:» .i:%'n:f:':....;ii.:q:{,:.sp.,ii.� ..................... s. tar . .I�.... ... �rs.G ta# . 3a.. ... .. . er..or...:. fltal.Feea.aC:lta 1:* t rl. i:s ...�.,9..f.. .... ......i.... .. ......... .. .... .ii ':.. A.,�.::,; ':'.:,/,<:ii:.:�:.: :;.i:i:s<ciii n:::•iii;::'r Il".:......:... .�+ ,,.,, .,,., f ....tit x,:.. ,..,.,,:,,,. ,: e� 9s,�..:,: '-: +►���/. '�.�>'ii.: F'.r .iQ MONSMISigegift . . ............ ...............Iteltt�l....,....................... .t y.:... .....................:....... ....,.......,...:..................................... ....... aci)€ .fit ...;/,.,. �/.:<:.>:.,,:,:.:.: CityCenter Herita •e • Miscellaneous "`•'s`: is no charge tothe w v ere is a e g llaneous $450 0 $7.50 $457.50 <„ l .,(£.;.,,, ttat;'s ' There g use h room;ho a er,'th setup charg of Rooms Programs and AV %<%`%` "'; ` <>:€ '`> $35 fora quart of the Heritage Room,a seta charge of$50 for half the gr ,,, ..:,i:/:,:.i rii:;<,.ii9 gP Meetings equipment) " %a 'fy € '>'?'<f<:: •Herita a Room and$100 setupcharge for the whole Heritage Room if s3 a '�18000.a<'.<'.> ;i y'' g g »ii>i"(::; special setup is required This is the same fee charged to other City i.e. Athletic Associations. groups, , 0- 0- 0- eitinIetitigialk Round Lake Park& • Varsity 0- Holasek Tennis Practices and ikati Courts GaS es m • Hi h School >;f''sr PhY Ed StaringLake - entl thefacility Park School District 0- 0 0- 0- :<:'>: • Curr f ctlt rental fee to the School District for this facility.is r-s r• tY Amphitheatre Parties <:t,. <;;; $50/hour. use of the sounds stem is re uired a fee willu'MIptio • If t $20/hour be tred. Y 9 v..:ii . ......,..: ..:: :.::..::....»»::::::::. s:<.:;.i>•i::ii;:sso:aii;r.:%:o<:a:�s.i: :ii ii'oiiiii: ;r;.::f:. t"sRAF')IITt?TRi,:.:: ,. 66 ? ':.::.:.:-il.....::,:;.�:..::,,..,i,:.:$�3#1"- $66275. 0 .:,:,i:,: ,;:i:i;ii'i;'�S�x43� �, ..::.::.:::::x>;�i:9,;::»::£:s:<'?:;;[::>tss::;:::i:::::::::f �::i:::::><�><:>: :;.::.s::.;:..::::::.::....:::.:i.�::;::i:.;:.i:;.;::<as>::�; t1s� t1''�isti�ct'�rsth�.,:. .: i�E r>l✓c i� City96.useiLaurie97 September 2,1997 PROJECTED FEES&CHARGES FOR 1998 SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES USED BY THE CITY . _;,,,:,;.*,,,xi.:i::•::::,:::%i',. ..720,,,,,,,i,,,,' •:MaNigira0MOOKM011:1MgaiMeiViiinVONEVAtet: AWeiteitittilUnglkiiiiatiat#10:tiathileWeltiimogqiiiidliWOM 416044411ite:MA.-. ://4040iW; ' ItAriiiidatitiatirAg m;,::,m."".....7 .":-/Ati% engle§iiiNtiONKWOIKgegNOS*004.01904 PhAlgfmi!i,;:ASgkql(_rtgagiWrt,::;,::--affgVig0*tfVPCNFVPFIMI:*r:,*P'ArW#O/rr*3r,470jgMP;j4 / co gingtmenogensoltpxokiessw.26.4”.0fise ,04",, AioiAreimottoxamagiV0W00111014***11 gg**.4.*k.,o-A,44.7.-Offop)'/ #MON:v;.-yidg4 m,m, ,.,,mmg,,:maa:1,:,:,,m,.51,mgmm,.,,Emow.avgoompowsotk...a410400@scarthipiNviogiigagigo.mogatfigiN igortiffivaSt*44;:koArfitned,y/araggi . 'AA* ........w vox High School Auxiliary • Safety Camp -0- -0- -0- -0- go,M agog's:A.,. ii!.]:t.A • Currently,the City pays$12/hour for this facility. Gym* iigagA00.0,4.fl iiii400ifitti Central Middle School •Sports,Fun&Fitness $24 -0- -0- $24 610944E4•:;i •Currently,the City is charged$12/hour(large gym;north Gymnasium • Open Gym $1,902 -0- -0- $1,902 Wilini.4:iltakett andtsouth)and$6/hour(small gym;west). • Volleyball $2,818 -0- -0- $2,818 :1211,11111 • Basketball $2,130 -0- -0- $2,130 HISOltigr •Wheelchair Basketball $162 -0- -0- $162 ineffNi24§00 - - :.'i'illililiV:l:lilla:..::.•,••,-,:,-,•,•••,••„.••,•,,,•-:•,-,i„.•:.7:7- Central Middle School • Volleyball $426 -0- -0- $426 ::;:nigMlgtAMM. • Currently,the City is charged$3/hour for this facility. Locker Rooms • Basketball $312 -0- -0- $312 MMO:momie, iV ,:,i* ,,r,iir.: Central Middle School •Tae Kwon Do $1,414 -0- -0- $1 iniiiiiiiiiiii ,414 ::Niqn:•:$$44ifflg::•..' • Currently,the City is charged$10/hour for use of this tile floor Multi Purpose Room •Swing Dance $200 -0- -0- $200 gi:NAMIKkinef space. •Adult Theatre $15 -0- -0- $15 iloilgidlOgge • Adult Theatre:3 hours @$5/hour. Oak Point Intermediate •Wheelchair Basketball $126 -0- -0- $126 inosAh#01, • Currently,the City is charged$6/hour(gym A or B)for this School Gym • Volleyball $1,816 -0- -0- $1,816 0.0,,104. facility. • Youth/Adult Open Gym Program $1,475 $980 -0- $2,455 :gi:NOVENNV • Youth/Adult Open Gym:Staffing is charged for this program • Staring Lake Concert Series* ::::::]•go:*.:*ia::i:mi!::::m.ii•i: because it is held Sundays. . ..-":i°" ".'•.'t!:!=!!!!:1=l:.: Oak Point Intermediate •Tae Kwon Do $40 -0- -0- $40 Oi•kibiitgitlOW•ll •mo Currently,the City is charged$5/hour for this facility. in:i*:.:.•:i:ii:::::g :f. ....., School Multi Purpose •Community Band $557 -0- $7 $564 Mgthf.09iipiiffie (Negotiated down from$10/hour.) (..„) \Room •Adult Theatre $30 -0- -0- $30 m mi:i.:0:::W iminimiimmi 0 • The same rate is charged for Tae Kwon Do at Oak Point and 12211111 Education Center,but$10/hour at CMS. 1, ge:Midiaggl • Adult theatre used Room 105(3 hours @$10/hour). =::::IT:n!.ZI:!„-'c''.. s:iiiiiiiig,,,,v-.-** Eden Lake Elementary • Volleyball $1,171 -0- -0- $1 o ,171 liwomf*, •Cunently,the City is charged$9/hour(three courts)or School Gym* • Preschool Program -0- -0- -0- -0- Ingpsolig $3/hour/court for this facility. lfi.a4:VSNMIP.:.K.A Cedar Ridge Elementary • Day Camp -0- -0- -0- -0- miamiAU.i.-POE • Currently,the City is charged$9/hour(three courts)or$3/hour School Gym* • Summer Playground Program -0- -0- -0- -0- 111 ,1!.g.!,4 for this facility. • Preschool Playgrounds -0- -0- -0- -0- ing,'"iiittA34:4 • Volleyball $75 -0- -0- $75 1111010 . ...-,v---... .6. ...2 Cedar Ridge Elementary • Day Camp -0- -0- -0- -0- wmigg.fmgp5:0.; •Currently,the City is charged$3/hour for this facility. School Large Classroom* • . • . • • • • •. • r :. r, ..: .. .,,.,.. .,... a� _: ,... ;�ek� e�.. '..;� ed eir iIi e ;�' tad�" . <.'i.; r <��: J. % ..,... ..... ........ .. 1, .. ..... ... ... . . ......... ..:..u.....1..............., ... .::�...�.:: pp� ,.. ,.J ,, .rJ ram,.. ..•. ,....,..... ., ,.. •.J . .. :,.,.J. r .../. 1. ......J ... .. ... ,.... »/ .....f.J.............. ... az 4. Y ':51i, ..:.s., r,,,r: '.ffs": .......................... .... .. ....... ... ..J,.4.J .1'.... ...,.n....... .. ..... .:. ..... A :.Y:; �Jffi Y�v w'f6f^.:1s91+: . ......... .....:... � �.. . ,.. fit.... 1'. - . .., ...... .,:.r ....... .r,. ..:.:.......:.. . ...J,. .....,...� . .....,:../... .... .............. ssu�ss .%>"c��;' ...: ,::..;:f✓i.�:::';::r:;;L'.:.:::rl��r;:�l,�.ri,..iia<�ii�^:.,,��u�i...:,.:�'';':,i: S�9>'., r ...t.:....,.<.......tt.L.,rL,.....,/.,!.l, ...t,.L.:.,./t r.//..>...,L.:...L,J.,.... ,...... ,z R s .rr:::.:::::, ...,::::::.gip;ii'.;'::::::::,.. ..v:: ...�.. :....,..:: r ...... .. . ..... ..... n... . .......: :... n : ...,r ., .,. .., .....r .....,•��.%S.�. ..,... ...... ....... .. .. .. .. ...:.N::i iif-:ifi:. .. : .+ :r. .+ Prairie View Elementary • Afternoon Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- 'y-W -A1„y;; : • Currently,the City is charged$6/hour(two courts)for this School Gym* • Preschool Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- f %` F"%3`i> facility. werpielifiWERifia Prairie View Elementary • Afternoon Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- i/„lf`y;? `!;?/`` •Currently,the City is charged$3/hour for this facility. School Large Classroom* • Preschool Playground -0- -0- -0- 0- 'sr' 7'; Forest Hills Elementary •Wheelchair Basketball $120 -0- -0- $120 ''<' . �'�s��`$� s..:.: Currently the City is charged$6/hour(two courts)for this School Gym* • Afternoon Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- %i:'!4? '<i i facility. • Preschool Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- 0.00.0.M.Oggift %' Forest Hills Elementary • Afternoon Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- e l: ,t ::: :.i f • Currently,the City is charged$3/hour for this facility. School Large Classroom* • Preschool Playground -0- -0- -0- -0- ;0i0,,:; Administration Building • Sports Camp -0- -0- -0- -0- ganiiVAOgn • Currently,the City is charged$3/hour for this facility. Gym* • Adult Theatre $27 $40 -0- $67 i' '%j • Supervisor on isor call:4 hours $10/hour. • Sports,Fun&Fitness $18 -0- -0- $18 <>.-,.r.r. °�% Education Center Multi Tae Kwon Do $30 -0- -0- $30 a>rie.:, `,1:::t'-;:r • Currently,the City is charged$5/hour for this facility plus air Purpose Room "</;'` conditioningcosts of approximately$3.50/hour during the . PPro imi summer. .:.J ..... ........e .... : .... ,...,. r J :..... ,:. '.�'. ..:.t., 'fit.. ...+�,. ... :';...:.:: tong o..lo:A7iG.:' ' Ogl' "iti om 'SkLTvb..ii ......._ (The School District hasn't charged the City for rainy day use by the preschool program,playground program,day camp,etc.) Cs'AC=Air Conditioning cost in the summer. *=rain backup only Schoo196.use/Laurie97 July 29,1997