Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council - 08/05/1997
AGENDA JOINT EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUESDAY, AUGUST 5,1997 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Young hans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Chair Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY. JULY 15. 1997 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JULY 15,1997 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. 2ND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 RELATING TO THE SALE OF ABANDONED PROPERTY City Council Agenda Tuesday, August 5, 1997 Page Two C. AWARD BID FOR PLAYGROUND PROPOSAL FOR RILEY LAKE PARK D. AWARD BID FOR PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE FOR STARING LAKE PARK E. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF UTILITY BODY FOR 1997 FORD 4X4 FORD CAB AND CHASSIS. I.C. 97-5436 F. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT TH212 AND FOUNTAIN PLACE INTERSECTION. I.C. 5398 G. RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT CSAH 61 (SHADY OAK ROAD) AND TH212 RAMPS AND AT SHADY OAK ROAD AND FLYING CLOUD DRIVE. I.C. 94-5344 H. RESOLUTION APPROVING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT SHADY OAK ROAD AND FLYING CLOUD DRIVE. I.C. 94-5344 I. RESOLUTION APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE SHADY OAK ROAD AND FLYING CLOUD DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS, I.C. 94-5344 J. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR HOPF ADDITION K. NATIONAL TIRE AND BATTERY by Sears, Roebuck and Co. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.15 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the C-Reg-Ser District on 1.15 acres, Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.15 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for National Tire and Battery for Sears. Location: Eden Road and Hwy. 212. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) City Council Agenda Tuesday,August5,1997 Page Three L. EDENVALE FAMILY HOUSING by Peter Andrea Co. and The Damone Group. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 6.3 acres and Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to RM-6.5 on 3.5 acres and to RM-2.5 on 2.8 acres, Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 6.3 acres and Approval of Developer's Agreements for Edenvale Family Housing for Peter Andrea Co. and the Damone Group. Location: Mitchell Road and Valley View Road. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review) M. BEST BUY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS EXPANSION 1997 by Best Buy Co., Inc. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 28.46 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on 1 acre; Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 28.46 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Best Buy Corporate Headquarters Expansion 1997 for Best Buy Co., Inc. Location: Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review) N. VILLAS AT MITCHELL LAKE by Hartford Capital Corporation. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 9.64 acres and Zoning District Change from R1-22 to R1-9.5 on 9.64 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Villas at Mitchell Lake for Hartford Capital Corporation. Location: Terrey Pine Drive and Highway 5. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change) O. SET JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 11.1997. 7:00 PM, SCHOOL BOARD ROOM V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. WYNSTONE by Jasper Development. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.76 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.01 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.01 acres, Zoning District Change from R1-22 to RM-6.5 on 4.76 acres and R1-13.5 on 4.25 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 9.01 acres into 31 lots. Location: Baker Road and Roberts Drive. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda TuesdaY,August5,1997 Page Four B. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR EDENVALE TOWNHOUSE PROJECT by Peter Andrea Company. Request for the Council to adopt a Resolution approving the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Edenvale Townhomes and request of HRA to adopt a Resolution adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing. Location: Southeast Corner of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road. (Resolution) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION (Councilmember Nancy Tyra-Lukens) X. APPOINTMENTS A. FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION - Appointment of a Citizen Representative to fill an unexpired term through March 31,1998 B. PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION -Appointment of 1 Representative to fill an unexpired term through March 31, 1998 XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. Presentation of 1996 Audit City Council Agenda TuesdaY,August5,1997 Page Five C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Recommendation on Consultant and Process to Develop a Management Plan for the Prairie BluffLLConservation Area 2. Update and Recommendations on Deer Management Plan D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 15, 1997 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: ROLLCALL All members were present. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 6:00 PM, HERITAGE ROOM IV 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Y ounghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorrmnson, Jr. and Nancy Tyra-Lukens Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Human Resources & Community Services Natalie Swaggert and Council Recorder Jan Nelson Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. II. UPDATE AND MODIFICATION OF CITY VISION STATEMENT Enger said the purpose of the workshop is to revisit and complete the Vision/Mission Statement. He suggested the Council review the current mission statement that was adopted in 1987 to see if it is still contemporary, and then make the necessary changes to integrate it with the value statements adopted by the Council. After reading the current mission statement, the Council reviewed a draft Vision/Mission Statement prepared by Staff. Councilmembers discussed the draft statement. Tyra-Lukens said the word "unique" is trite. Case said the phrase regarding integration should include people as well as natural beauty and physical development. Butcher-Younghans thought the phrase, "created through the integration of ... " was cumbersome, and she would like to indicate that the process is ongoing. Harris said it is important to be able to remember the mission statement. She thought the draft shows what we have been doing for the last 15 years, and it has elements of action and past activity. Enger said the word "integration" is a critical word as a recognition of what we are all about. Thorfinnson wanted to include the word "planned" as well as "created. " Harris thought we might want to include more things that contribute to the quality of life. Enger said we may need to create a vision statement that is more for where we want to go that we can use to determine what our community will be like. I CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP MEETING July 15, 1997 Page 2 Thorfmnson thought we should get the vision statement out of our five values. He was not sure the draft statement sends a message that we will drive the Strategic Management process forward from here. Tyra-Lukens was not sure the City will ever be "done." She thought we will always be redoing something once it is fully developed. Case suggested each Councilmember write their version of the draft and submit it to Staff for incorporation into a second draft statement. Councilmembers agreed with his suggestion. Enger said they will include a form for the individual revisions in the packets along with the suggestions from tonight's meeting. III. DISCUSSION OF VISION 2001 PROCESS Harris said we need to identify the 2001 focus areas. Enger suggested we have a cross section of the population take a look at the completed Vision Statement and the focus areas when we are done. He suggested we avoid having just special interest groups involved in the groups. Tyra-Lukens noted the School District planning process developed with focus areas. Swaggert reviewed the focus areas identified including economic development, environmental and open spaces, transportation, health and social services, art and culture and technological access to city services. She said there are cross-cutting issues for residents, businesses, the schools and others. Tyra-Lukens thought we should have people serve on focus groups they would not normally choose. Butcher-Younghans suggested we include members of the faith community, seniors and youth. Tyra-Lukens suggested including the health community, builders/developers, home-office residents, homeowners and renters, landowners, vested interest groups, human services deliverers and the county. Enger said Staff will put together a list based on the Council's suggestions and include that in the packet. He said it might make sense to have an October meeting for the focus group process. The School District did an educational session and then a working session. Harris thought the first session would be a brainstorming session, then, if some areas require more study, we could set up task forces. IV. OTHER BUSINESS V. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. 2 TUESDAY, JULY 15, 1997 CITY COUNCIL: CITY COUNCIL STAFF: UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorrmnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLLCALL All members were present. PRESENTATION OF THE CITY ACHIEVEMENT AWARD FOR THE EDEN PRAIRIE HOPE PROGRAM TO THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND THE HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION & SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD FROM THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Jim Miller, Executive Director of the League of Minnesota Cities, presented a City Achievement A ward in the category of housing and economic development for the Eden Prairie HOPE Project. Mayor Harris thanked Mr. Miller, the League and all those who made the program successful. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Case added item XI.A.l. Ouestions About Severe Weather Siren Alerts. Thorfinnson added item XI.A.2. Report on 1-494 Corridor Commission. Harris said City Attorney Pauly has requested a Closed Session with the Council at the close of the regular meeting to discuss matters in litigation. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve the Agenda as published. Motion carried 5-0. II. OPEN PODIUM Kim Lindquist, 9933 Balmoral Lane, said they have had their second neighborhood meeting for a development in their immediate area, and they believe the developer has made no attempt to address their concerns. They have sent letters to the Planning I CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 2 Commission and to the Council explaining the extent of their concerns about the project. Dennis Bracken, 9913 Balmoral Lane, said they are on the fringe of Hwy 169 near the new river bridge, and they hear truck traffic all night. There are noise barriers on the Bloomington side, but they have none on their side of the highway. He said the area without noise barriers will grow if the developer's plan is approved. Barb Cornell, 10050 Buckingham Drive, was concerned that the traffic issue be fully addressed as there are many small children in their neighborhood. Harris said their concerns have been duly noted by the Council and there will be opportunities for neighborhood input at each stage of the project as it goes forward. Charles Knowles, owner of a tobacco store in Hopkins, said he has applied for a license for a new store in Eden Prairie. He asked that the Council reconsider banning self- service in his store. His store will be only 15 feet wide and they don't allow anyone in the store under the age of 18. Harris noted the ordinance was enacted to inhibit youth access to tobacco, but the Council could have some discussion about it. III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING WITH EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE HELD TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1997 Harris said page 4, paragraph 2, sentence 4 should be changed to: "We don't have a formal structure at present, but ... " Butcher-Y ounghans said the spelling on page 4, paragraph 6, should be changed to "More House." MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve as published and amended the Minutes of the City Council Joint Meeting with Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce held Tuesday, July 1,1997. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Thorfinnson abstaining. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY , JULY 1, 1997 MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve as published the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, July 1, 1997. Motion carried 4-0-1, with Thorfmnson abstaining. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. ADOPT RESOLUTION 97-130 SupPORTING A HENNEPIN COUNTY APPLICATION FOR ISTEA FUNDING OF CSAH 1 BETWEEN EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD AND TH212 :t. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 3 C. ADOPT RESOLUTION 97-131 SUPPORTING A HENNEPIN COUNTY APPLICATION FOR ISTEA FUNDING OF THI0l BETWEEN CSAH 62 ANDTH5 D. CAR-X MUFFLER AND BRAKE by Cook Properties -Eden Prairie, L.L.C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 33-97 for Zoning District Change from Rural to C- Reg-Ser on .56 acres, Adopt Resolution 97-132 for Site Plan Review on 0.56 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Car-X Muffler and Brake for Brian Cook. Location: 8108 Eden Road. (Ordinance 33-97 for Zoning District Change and Resolution 97-132 for Site Plan Review) E. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.3 FOR DEN ROAD MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE F. RESOLUTION 97-133 AWARDING BID FOR ONE LIGHT RESCUE SQUAD FOR THE EDEN PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I.C. 97-5436) MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve items A-F on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGSIMEETINGS A. MUSA LINE EXPANSION Adopt Resolution 97-134 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. (Resolution 97-134 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment) Enger said the official notice of this Public Meeting was published on July 10, 1997 in the Eden Prairie News. The Council received a request from three property owners in the spring of 1997 and, after reviewing the supply and demand for land, the Council directed that the Met Council be petitioned for the change in the MUSA line. After a review of the City's updated transportation plan, the Metropolitan Council voted on June 16, 1997, to approve approximately 600 acres of the City's MUSA Line request and to continue the discussion on the remaining approximately 235 acres for 60 days. The 235 acres represents property proposed to be acquired by the Metropolitan Airports Commission outside of the current MUSA line. He noted the MUSA line expansion changes the timing of possible development of the southwest area and is not a land use plan. The current comprehensive land use plan remains in place. Enger suggested the appropriate action for the Council would be for the approval of the 835 acres, 235 of which would be contingent upon further approvals from the Met Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the resolution last evening and recommended on a unanimous vote that the request be approved and the Musa line be extended. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 4 Enger said the Council looked at general strategies for development in the southwest area at the last meeting. The City has also visited with major property owners and developers because we are at a point where we can engage in active discussions before development proposals come in. He said a key element to the success of such a process is to have the parties at the table who are able to carry out the results of the discussions. We have additional controls going forward through our current process for approval, a process that has resulted in the developed part of Eden Prairie being as it is today. We will also have to go through the process of a Feasibility Study for the public utilities in the areas. None of the property is currently zoned to a higher use than agricultural. David MacEvers, 8685 Black Maple Drive, said he was speaking on behalf of the Eden Prairie Conservation Alliance. They are trying to protect the scenic views and natural open spaces. He suggested a southwest Eden Prairie initiative be held that would include a series of workshops to discuss development in that area. Topics should include such items as the trail system and the linkage to the Minnesota River trail system, erosion control, bluff setbacks, open space preservation, and preservation of historically significant land. They would like to see a map of Eden Prairie showing the protected land. Enger noted the MUSA line proposal includes only the top of the Minnesota river bluffs, not the actual bluffs nor the base. Paul Olson, 8899 Flescher Circle, was concerned about information transmission about what is going on to people in Eden Prairie. He thought we need to address the issues of higher density now when we have an opportunity to discuss it at the front end of the development process. He would like to see what the tax revenue generation proposed by the plan would be. The populace of Eden Prairie does not respond to a development project until it is in their backyard, and he would like to see some effort made to make the general populace aware of what is going on. Harris noted we have grappled with how best to make the citizens aware of what is going on and have made use such means as the community newsletter. Olson said the most troubling issue to him was looking at the Guide Plan that shows an anticipated use of 2.5 units per acre while we are now looking at a geometric change to that number. Enger said, in round numbers, the 3000 residential units valued at $200,000 would produce $2.4 million in annual tax revenue. The value of the 1500 acres is $130 million. He noted the growth strategies presented at the last meeting were just asking for more defmite direction from the Council as to what they may be willing to entertain, specifically density transfer. The 1500 acres is gross, while the net area for development is 835 acres. They would attempt to preserve over 40% of the land as open space and would have to use density transfer in order to do that. He noted that the drawings were not plans, but rather were just suggestions. We are not suggesting that the density increase at all. if CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 5 Michael Rush, 6907 Hanover Lane, representing the Citizens for Responsible Development, thought this has implications for all of Eden Prairie. He noted they do not oppose extending the MUSA line but rather are concerned about the decision-making process. They feel that when they come forward to give their input, it is at the end of the process. They lose the ability to get good ideas into the strategic plan when they get involved on a project-by-project basis. He thought the goals presented at the last meeting were unfortunate in that one goal would have to be pursued at the expense of another. He thought we need debate on which goals to pursue in terms of priority. There are also no parameters for achievement of objectives. Rush proposed that their coalition would put together some of the people who would be helpful in the discussions and bring their names to the Council. They would like to be treated as a group of record so that they could get copies of existing materials and any materials produced going forward at no charge. They would like tonight's decision to be tabled in order to explore objectives and strategy and make sure we get it right. They would like to come back in 60 days to give a series of proposals that would provide some alternatives or ideas that have not been brought forth. Brett Hope, 14700 Flying Cloud Drive, said he is a conservationist who has worked on environmental issues in the City for several years. He was concerned that the conservation issues remain part of the focus. Dan Herbst, developer and builder, has seen the City develop some of the most superior ordinances in the seven-county area. The Comprehensive Guide Plan provides protection of the bluffs, wetlands, trees and steep slopes. He thought delays will cause developers to be denied use of their land. Delays will increase the cost of housing in the City. Norma Wuttke, 16860 Flying Cloud Drive, was concerned about recurring invasions of privacy on her property during the last few years. She did not think anyone else should decide what she should do with her property . Loren Wuttke, 16860 Flying Cloud Drive, said he owns 53 acres of land that he bought and paid taxes on to provide an opportunity to give his son an inheritance. He was concerned about over-regulation and noted the State Supreme Court made a decision regarding the property owner being able to collect if there is a diminishment of the value of his property. He was concerned that the Conservation Alliance wants to regulate someone else's land. John Standal, 9955 Spring Road, said the time has come for the property owners in the southwest area and he believes the current process will work between City Staff and the property owners. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 6 David Brown, 9801 Spring Road, has always been treated fairly and honestly by City staff and he appreciates what they have done. He has developed a lot of property in Eden Prairie and has always felt a responsibility for that development. He thought we have ordinances that will protect us. One of the great costs of housing is land cost and development costs. The longer development is delayed, the more expensive the projects become. Darrill Peterson, Flying Cloud Drive, said it would not be right to deny the property owners the rights to develop their property. Richard Voegel, 1105 Pioneer Trail, thought Staff has done a good job of protecting Eden Prairie. He would like to see the extension approved. Mike Soule, 1492 Homestead Trail, Minnetrista, said the process the City has endorsed thus far in the development of Eden Prairie has been very successful. He did not think it would be wise to delay the expansion. Rush said he wanted to make it clear to the landowners that his group does not want to stop anyone from developing their land; however, extending the MUSA line isn't free and we, as a City, are being asked to pay for the extension of the MUSA line. The fact that we have to put in the utilities is worthy of debate. He said they are not standing in opposition of personal property rights. Tyra-Lukens noted that Mr. Rush referred to the earlier group of citizens as being an example of citizen input at the end of the process; however, that group is actually at the beginning of the development process. She said the MUSA line issue is at its beginning as well. Harris said the development process in the southwest area will give an opportunity for anyone who is truly interested to be involved. She said we have a formal process that begins with the kind of guiding principles that have brought about the current development process. She would hesitate to set up additional processes beyond those we now have in place. Enger said we made a decision many years ago to accept urban services to our area. We put together a plan to respond to growth and accepted utilities. A debt was incurred for the infrastructure that was end-loaded so that early residents don't pay for all the debt. He thought the idea that current residents would subsidize the infrastructure debt in the southwest area is incorrect. Harris read aloud the proposed resolution. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to adopt Resolution 97-134 amending the Comprehensive Municipal Plan for an 835 acre MUSA Line expansion, provided however, adoption of the amendment of the plan as it related to 235 acres proposed to be acquired by the Metropolitan (p CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 7 Airports Commission is subject to Metropolitan Council approval. Motion carried 5-0. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Butcher-Younghans, Case, Thorfinnson, Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. 1ST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2 RELATING TO THE SALE OF ABANDONED PROPERTY Enger said the Police Department has requested this amendment in order to enable the City to sell abandoned property through an organization called "The City Store," reported to be an outlet for Minneapolis police property and evidence warehouse. Tyra-Lukens asked how much of this type of property we sell. Dietz said we collect up to 150-200 bikes per year and have had to store them in the maintenance facility. This is an alternative way to dispose of such property. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 2 relating to the Sale of Abandoned Property. Motion carried 5-0. VIII. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REQUEST FROM RADIATOR WAREHOUSE TO REVIEW THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS -DENIAL OF VARIANCE 97-8 (AN EXTENSION OF VARIANCE 96-9), Enger said, after several months of violation of the Ordinance prohibiting outside storage, the proponent applied for a one-year variance to allow continued use of three metal storage units. The Board of Adjustments & Appeals granted a one-year variance to allow continued use of the metal storage units in May of 1996. The proponent did not conform to the conditions of the variance, and the Board of Adjustments & Appeals denied further extension of the variance at its June 1997 meeting. The proponent is requesting review of the Board's decision. Enger said the Council has a choice as to whether to set a public meeting to hear an appeal of the variance or to uphold the Board of Appeals findings. Thorfinnson and Tyra-Lukens were in favor of supporting the Board's findings. 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 8 Butcher-Younghans asked what the outcome of denying the variance would be. Enger said the proponent would have to remove the three metal storage units. If he did not remove them, he would be in violation of the City ordinance and could receive a fine or possibly be imprisoned. Case asked how many days would proponent have to remove the three buildings if we vote to support the Board's decision. Enger said staff would be reasonable, and it could be open to Council direction. Case was concerned about the precedent issue, and he thought we need to draw the line somewhere. He would like to see a way to give him some more time. Harris agreed with supporting the Board of Appeals, but we should set a date for removal. Enger noted the Board recommended 60 days. Butcher- y ounghans said she could support that time limit. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to support the Board of Adjustments & Appeals decision denying Variance 97-8. Motion carried 5-0. IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Questions About Severe Weather Siren Alerts Case received a call from a woman in the Winfield neighborhood Sunday evening after the storm. She said the severe weather sirens were going off in Chanhassen but she did not think the sirens in Eden Prairie were going off. Case asked if the sirens are strategically located and how loud they should be. Enger said the sirens did go off in Eden Prairie. He reviewed the process used to set off the sirens. He noted that strong winds can cause a variation in the sound from the sirens. He will review the procedures with Police Chief Clark. Butcher-Y ounghans asked if the sirens go off for severe thunderstorms or just for tornadoes. Dietz said they go off when there is imminent danger for property or life. He thought we should have Police Chief Clark explain the procedures. He noted the sirens are not meant to be an indoor warning, so it would be possible not to hear them inside the home. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 9 Case asked if it is possible there are areas that are not covered. Enger said staff will check with Clark to see if there are any holes in the system. 2. Report on 1-494 Corridor Commission Thorfinnson said they made a presentation on July 6 to the last of the seven City Councils and received their approval for the new direction of the commission. They will begin the process of rewriting the Joint Powers Agreement and will bring it forward for the Council's support. They are looking at MNDoT's proposed construction along the 1-494 corridor. They are talking to the engineers of the cities involved in order to map out the plans with MNDoT to see which items should be put on the priority list. Regarding the Commission's trip to Washington, D. C., Thorfinnson said there was no formal request made for money; however they learned a lot about the process. They plan to return next year with a formal request for construction of the 1-494 expansion. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. MILLER SPRING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Lambert said the Watershed District reviewed and recommended approval of the Miller Spring improvement project with the City of Eden Prairie. They are asking for approval of the concept and the general cost estimate and also for authorization for Barr Engineering to do the final plans and specs. The City would withhold [mal approval of the project until we can look at the final design of the gazebo. The Staff has some concerns about how we will deal with water freezing inside the gazebo and how the riprap will work. Butcher-Y ounghans would like to see the plan retain as much of the natural beauty of the spot as possible. Lambert said this does not go outside the existing boundaries. Butcher-Younghans said it was difficult to tell where the boundaries are because there were no measurements. Tyra-Lukens would like to see a much less expensive version of the project. She was dismayed at the expansion in size and scale of the gazebo. She thought this is way too costly for what we are getting out of it, especially in consideration of other park projects we need. q CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 10 Case said that, during an earlier discussion on Miller Springs improvements, someone made the comment that this is one of the most visible and most used sites in the City. He wanted to verify whether we know if pollution to the water table could result in this not being usable in the near future. Lambert said there is no guarantee on an artesian well like this is. They test it weekly, but it could change at any time. Harris thought this type of construction could help prevent site contamination. Thorfmnson was not sure about the gazebo. He asked if the parking area proposed also serves the walking trails. Lambert said it does; however, there will be another access points to the Prairie Bluff Recreation Area with parking. Tyra-Lukens thought we had decided we needed to meet the needs of the community at this point to make it safe and attractive and then if we have more money in 15 years or so, we could improve it at that time. Butcher-Y ounghans thought this is an important project and she liked the idea of a gazebo to provide cover to people getting water. She would like to see something slightly smaller, and she was not sure of the riprap. A certain portion of the cost is for the parking, but she thought we might reduce the size of the gazebo. Lambert said we could not scale it down and have it provide the shelter necessary. He suggested we do the gazebo as an add-alternate. It could be added later or we might be able to get a group to pay for it. Tyra-Lukens suggested we have alternate versions of the gazebo drawn up. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to authorize Barr Engineering to proceed with plans and specifications for the Miller Spring improvement project and provide the City Council with detailed plans on the final design of the gazebo prior to going out for bid on this project and incorporating the Council's recommendations regarding the gazebo. Motion carried 5-0. 2. JULY FOURTH CELEBRATION UPDATE Lambert said they have had nothing but positive responses so far. He said it is not too soon to determine whether we want to stay in the Eden Prairie Center area or go back to Round Lake Park. We need to contract for the fireworks events and with the landowners. Case also has heard nothing but positive feedback for this year's event. Some people qualified it with the fact that they liked Round Lake Park for the all day event on the beach. He would like the Council to have an 10 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 11 early discussion about the pros and cons of alternative sites. He thought the airport should be considered as they were excited about the concept of using their land for this year's event. Butcher-Younghans thought it was a good test case. The responses she got were that this worked so well, why do something different. Thorfinnson thought there is a hidden cost for the non-profit vendors who could not raise close to the amount of money they raised in the past because of the venue. He did not want them to be forgotten. Tyra-Lukens liked Councilmember Case's idea about getting a list ofthe pros and cons of what we do with this event. She was concerned about the public safety because it could expand even more in terms of numbers. She thought it was a little easier to handle at Round Lake Park. Harris received only positive comments. She had been concerned about moving it from Round Lake Park, but her impression at the event was that people were having a very good time. She thought the band contributed to the ambiance. There was ease of access and exit because of the multiple sites of entry, so it was available to more people. Regarding the concerns about public safety, Enger's discussions with Police Chief Clark revealed the Police were very happy with the way it went this year. They handled at least twice as many people with half the effort. They are not endorsing going back to Round Lake Park. They have received a lot of complaints about Round Lake Park, and they didn't receive any negative input about this event. It was much more manageable. The business community stepped up the sponsorship because it was in the business area. He thought we can address the issue of the service organizations and find ways to help them improve their performance. Case noted there were things going on at each park. He thought there are some alternatives that may address the issues. He thought Staff needs to take the lead on developing the plan with Council input. D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. RESOLUTION 97-135 AUTHORIZING SALE OF PARKS/PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND FIRE STATION NO.1 TO MnDOT FOR TH212 RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES 1/ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 15, 1997 Page 12 Dietz said City staff have finalized the terms and conditions of sale of the City buildings, including provision to allow us use of the fire station until as late as June 1998. If we have to vacate by March 31, 1998, it will be at a time when we won't have a fire station. The fall-back plan would be to use parks and public works building. Harris asked how soon after March 31 we would be able to have the new fire station. Dietz said he can't answer that, but it probably would be mid-year at best. They have a lot of issues to decide on, including financial issues, a decision-making process to prioritize location of the site, and some negotiation to fmalize the sale of land. Until a design is underway, it is going to be a full year process at best. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution 97-135 authorizing sale of Fire Station No.1 and Parks/Public Works Maintenance Building to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for right-of-way purposes to construct Trunk Highway 212 (TH212). Motion carried 5-0. F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Pauly said the Council should reconsider the motion for item VII. A. because it was an appeal rather than a request for review. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to reconsider the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Butcher-Y ounghans withdrew the motion with the consent of Thorfinnson. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to set a date of August 19, 1997 to hear the Appeal of Variance 97-8. Motion carried 5-0. XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. At 10: 10 p.m. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting to a closed session with City Attorney Pauly to discuss matters in litigation. I~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar 8-5-97 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance -Pat Solie Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR (MULTI-F AMIL Y & COMM) Dave Berry Construction Inc Daniel Heisler Preimier General Contracting Ed Sheehy Construction PLUMBING Lee Plumbing Piperight Plumbing UTILITY INSTALLER Piperight Plumbing August 5 1997 1 GASFITTER American Burner Service Inc HEATING & VENTILATING Abatec Mechanical Inc American Burner Service Helland Heating & AlC LAWN FERTILIZER APPLICATOR Green Masters RAFFLE Homeward Bound Inc (Bearpath Golf & Country Club -9-22-97 with 30 day waiver) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar August 5, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Amending City Administration Code Chapter 2 Relating to the Sale of IV. B. Abandoned Property BACKGROUND: The 1st reading of the Ordinance was approved at the July 15 City Council meeting. The effect of the amendment is to permit the sale of abandoned property through a nonprofit organization that has a significant mission of community service. This alternative to sale at a public auction is authorized by state law. The police department has requested this amendment in order to enable the City to sell abandoned property through an organization called "The City Store," reported to be an outlet for Minneapolis police property and evidence warehouse. REQUESTED ACTION: Approve 2nd reading of the Ordinance. I .. ORDINANCE NO. ___ _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2.86, SUBD. 2. BY RELETTERING PARAGRAPH "D" TO "E" AND ADOPTING A NEW PARAGRAPH "D" AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code Section 2.86, Subd. 2 is amended by changing paragraph D to paragraph E and by adopting new paragraph D as follows: D. In lieu of the procedures set forth in paragraph C of this subdivision abandoned property may be disposed by a private sale through a nonprofit organization that has a significant mission of community service. Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the __ day of _________ -', 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the __ day of __________ --" 1997. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the_' _day of _________ ->. 1997. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: Aug. 5, 1997 Section: Consent Calendar Department: PRNR Award of Bid for Playground Proposal for Riley Item No.: 1Y C Bob Lambert, Director ~ Lake Park RECOMMENDATION: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council award the bid of installation of playground equipment at Riley Lake Community Park to the Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for a total cost of $50,000 subject to Miracle Recreation agreeing to install woodchips, rather than pea rock as the base material at the same price. On July 22, Brenda Werner, Representative from Miracle Recreation Equipment Company agreed to install 10 inches of woodchips as the base material in lieu of the pea rock specified in the proposal. City staff support the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and request the City Council award the bid to Miracle Recreation Equipment Company. BACKGROUND: At the July 21, 1997 meeting, the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission listened to presentations to playground manufacturer representatives and reviewed the five proposed plans for installation of playground equipment at Riley Lake Community Park. After a lengthy discussion on the pros and cons of the various proposals, each Commission member ranked the projects from one through five. Miracle Recreation received four first place rankings, two second place, and one third place for a low cumulative score of 11. Minnesota Wisconsin Playground Equipment Company received five second place rankings, one first place, and one third place for a cumulative score of 14. Flanagan Sales received two first place rankings and five third place rankings for a cumulative score of 17. Earl F. Anderson received a score of28 and St. Croix Recreation Company received a score of35. BL:mdd playbidIBob97 1 Memorandum To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission From: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources~ Date: July 15, 1997 Subject: Evaluation of Playground Proposals for Riley Lake Park REQUEST: City staff requests the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to review five proposals submitted for development of the playground structure at Riley Lake Community Park. This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for a final decision. BACKGROUND: The Capital Improvement Plan has proposed $50,000 for development of the playground area in Riley Lake Community Park for 1997. In the past, the City has often designed a concept plan for a playground and then requested various playground companies to bid on the concept plan. In many cases this is a frustrating process because the concept plan is based on one particular manufacturer's product and it is often difficult for other manufacturers to match the product and provide a competitive bid. City staff have reversed the process somewhat for the Riley Lake playground project. Staff have requested all playground manufacturers to bid $50,000 worth of playground equipment to be placed on the site. Staff have requested the representatives from the various playground manufacturers to use their own creativity and design expertise in developing the best playground site using their product limiting their bids to $50,000 for equipment and installation. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the Request for Proposal, as well as a summary of each of the playground manufacturers proposals. FIVE MINUTE PRESENTATIONS: Each of the playground manufacturers representatives will have five minutes to describe their proposed project. They were each required to provide a colored display or illustration of what they are proposing. After the presentations, Commission members will have an opportunity to ask questions from the various manufacturers and then will be requested to make a recommendation to the City Council on which playground company will be awarded the bid. The City Council will review the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommendation and the proposals from the various companies at their August 5th meeting. SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS: Minnesota Wisconsin Playground, Inc. Total Bid: $50,000 Structure includes: one custom Tottime playstructure, one custom Prime Time playstructure, one heavy duty galvanized swing frame with three belt swings, one accesible swing and 12" of fiber 100 ground cover. Earl F. Anderson Total Price: $50,000 Playstructure includes one custom ship play booster structure, one swing unit that includes, one four-belt swing and one full bucket swing and one molded bucket seat that is wheelchair accessible, one sea horse spring rider, one dolphin spring rider, one 18' long track ride, soft step wood fiber resilient surface 10" in depth, two areas with resilient poured in place rubber for wheelchair accessibililty, including installation and concrete pad. Flanagan Sales, Inc. Total Bid: $50,000 Product: Little Tykes Commercial Play Systems Structures One custom kid builder playstructure appropriate for ages 5-12: a kid builders swing set, including two belt swings, two tot swings and one tire swing, a kid builder ship, three spring riders and two diggers, 12" of 9" wood fiber play surface and sand as a base under the swing riders and the play area. Miracle Recreation Equipment Company Total Bid: $50,000 Structure includes one center stage kids choice play system, one overhead flyer with chain bar system, one fitness cluster system, one swing set that includes four belt seats, one 360-degree tot swing and one accessible seat, one 13' medium geodesic climber, one twin rider, two spring riders (frog and squirrel), four 6' in ground PVC coated benches, ground cover includes 12" of washed pea gravel and 105 square feet of resilient rubber surfacing. St. Croix Recreation Company, Inc. Total Bid: $49,987.85 Playground equipment includes: one accessible pirate ship, one engine room telegraph, one binocular, one compass, one steam engine, one railway carriage, one goods wagon, one workshop, one multi spring seesaw, one two-place swing set, one toddler swing, one fire truck, plus 148 cubic yards of shredded resilient material (Compan is the company that installed the equipment at Miller Park. This equipment is a duplicate of many of the facilities at Miller Park). CONSIDERATIONS: Although, all but one of the bids are $50,000, the $49,987.85 bid should be considered as a $50,000 bid. All companies were directed to provide a $50,000 bid and the most play value for that price. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission members will have an opportunity to experience fIrst hand the diffIculties in selecting playground equipment that is really an apples and oranges comparison. Commission members should think of the site, and try to determine which of the play structures would provide the most play value to the children that will be visiting RileyLake Park. Commission members should also be reminded that there are a wide variety of color selections for any of these proposals, so don't let the color of the equipment at the presentation influence your choice of manufacturer. One of the questions you may pose to the manufacturer representatives is a copy of the color selection for the various pieces of equipment. Other questions may relate to ADA accessibility, warantee, and age of children that will be appropriate for various components. BL:mdd evaipiay/Bob97 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND BID ruLEYLAKEPARKPLAYGROUND CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the Request For Proposal and Bid is to obtain site plan design concepts and bids for installation of playground structures and the site plan for the playground site at Riley Lake Park in Eden Prairie. B. ISSUING OFFICE The RFP is issued by the City of Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department. All correspondence regarding this RFP must be addressed to: City of Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612-949-8440). C. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR Following signing of the contract, all communications concerning the contract must be directed to Robert A. Lambert, at 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. D. INCURRING COSTS The City of Eden Prairie is not liable for any cost incurred by the prospective firms prior to the signing of the contract. E. PROPOSALS To be considered, each finn must submit a complete response to this RFP, using the fonnat provided in Section 3. The proposal must be signed in ink by an official authorized to bind the submitter to its provisions. The proposal must include a statement as to the period during which the proposal remains valid. This period must be a least sixty (60) days from the due date for this proposaL F . ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSAL CONTENT The contents of this proposal will become contractual obligations, if a contract ensues. Failure of the selected consultant to accept these obligations may result in cancellation of the award. G. SELECTION CruTERlA Responses to this RFP will be evaluated based on a three step selection process: t 5 1. Staff will review the firm's response to the RFP, including either a model of the proposed proj ect, a graphic artists' rendition of the proj ect or a computerized drawing of the proposed project, and determine if the proposal meets all criteria for consideration. 2. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will review the proposals that meet all of the criteria of the RFP and hear the presentation of the proposer. The Commission will then make a recommendation to the City CounciL 3. The City Council will review the proposals and the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and will award the bid. H. PROPOSAL RECEIPT Proposals must arrive at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department on or before 4:30 p.m., July 11, 1997. I. RIGHT TO REJECT BIDS The City of Eden Prairie reserves the right to award the total proposal, to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part, and to waive any informality or technical defects, in City's judgement, the best interest of the City will be served. In detennination of award, the qualification of the proposal submitter, the confonnity with the specifications of services to be supplied and delivery terms will be considered. J. COST LIABILITY The City assumes no responsibility of liability for costs incurred by the finns prior to the signing of this agreement. Total liability of the City of Eden Prairie is limited to the terms and conditions of this agreement. II. INTERVIEW Selected firms will be given the opportunity to present" in more detail, their proposal to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. The Commission will review all approved proposals and make a recommendation to the City Council. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission will interview firms and review the projects at their July 21, 1997 meeting. The City Council will award the bid at their August 5, 1997 meeting. t III. PROPOSAL A. PROPOSAL FORMAT The finn will be responsible for submitting a written proposal listing each piece of equipment and cost for that piece of equipment, as well as the cost for the base material, indicating the type of base material, the depth of the material, etc. and the installation cost for the proj ect. The proposal must also include either a graphic design, computer enhanced drawing, or model of the project being proposed. B. FEE QUOTATIONS The fee proposal of $50,000 for the project will include all costs associated with the project, including all equipment, structures, base material and installation. The site will be prepared by the City of Eden Prairie. This will include any grading necessary and installation of a drainage system. All projects are to be bid at a cost of $50,000. Each firm is requested to provide the maximum amount of play activities for that fee. C. SITE REVIEW Consultants submitting bids must visit the site and should contact Stuart Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources at 949-8445 to arrange an inspection of the site. D. POSSIBLE PLA YGROUNP THEME Riley Lake Park does include the Riley/Jacques Homestead, which is a historical fannstead. City staff have discussed the possibility of developing a playground with a farming theme or a historical theme. Riley Lake Park is adjacent to Riley Lake; therefore, a theme related to water may also be appropriate. E. PROJECT PHASING The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Staff are challenging various playground manufacturers to use their professional expertise and creativity to develop a unique playground at Riley Lake Park. It is appropriate to submit a proposal in which this $50,000 project is the first of several phases or a single phase project; however, there is no guarantee that the second phase would be awarded to the same manufacturer. F. TIMETABLE 1. Proposal Submittal Deadline -Friday, July 11, 1997,4:30 p.m. i '1 RiJeypJa/Bob97 June 17, 1997 2. Review by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission -7:00 p.m, July 21, 1997. 3. Award by the City Council-August 5, 1997. 4. Completion of installation -October 15, 1997 July 11, 1997 City of Eden Prairie Robert A. Lambert 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN. 55344-2230 I-Custom Tottime (2-5 years) Playstructure $11,500.00 I-Custom PrimeTime (5-12 years) Playstructure $25,000.00 I-Heavy Duty Galvanized Swing Frame $1,500.00 12ft FmAR 100 System 6,100.00 Installation of GT & FIBAR $5,900.00 Total for Riley Lake Park: $50,000.00 Prices above include tax and freight to Eden Prairie, MN. Signed:~ . Accepted: ========== The prices above are good through August 11, 1997. . .", Prices listed above DO NOT'include Phase 2, sand, prep, site restoration or edging. Net 20 days. Equipment will take 4-6 weeks to manufacture. l P.O. Box 27328 • Golden Valley, MN. 55427 ::;::=:::;----------Phone: (612) 546-7787 • (800) 622-5425 -----------...-" '~; lp~~~o,;;;1 FAX: (612) 546-5050 0 pnnled on recycled paper 01 It I I 12' FBAR 100 SYSTEM _I It 1- '" / '6'0' " I I \ { \ I b. \ \ "-/ """'.-.....::avl '" -I u~rvM. 1--~·A'tf"!)J:)V"'I.H' L _______________ PROPOSED BLACKTOP/CONCRETE PATH (BY OWNER) / ..... 5-I 2 PLAY AREA BORDER (BY OW>£R) '" " 2-5 PL,", Y / ,,-----_/ / "-- I \ -"" I STEPS II.H'J~ _ I " ~ ClHl'RAl Sf ATES PANl. e-n09.Jl:' - -I If'f'Sta..w.EIR TIC·TAC.-TCE . "./' f' ~ \ / r ........ """-"""'! / wtSnBK; ........ I "I AAO<"""",, I \ I W/ ......... -e. \ I / ~r \ f-..../ jJ!~ n ~~/ {I 1\ ra.,. ... w'a:! « , --"""" 16 111' ,,________ WAVE!lDE ~.-.... ~--\.tJF' \ ClAw.. TU!JE \ \ ~~r~ \} =,~= ~ , \ CRAZY BGKT' ClOVER a..waER &CloeuE II IFr.MMER ;28 '::J:!:r' '-• I AAO<IR>OE j. I I II I I _ • I I \ '1 -----"""'tET 1'-' 1 1 , / {---.;~ ---I ..,.--. I nee. ~ \ ~~~ ~f'lA"fK'IUI\/ ~'NG. FIlAR 100 SYSTEM \ \ It "-"''' / \ /' ---- -I '" ...........---__ -'" " _______ /' EXISTING PATH ~ /I. ,--.... /1~ t,......-..., ~ -,- ~ Earl F. Andersen, Inc. QUOTATION TO: ATTN: FAX: DATE: PROJECT: QUANTITY 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Areas 1 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PARKS & RECRATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 8080 MITCHELL ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 FROM: PHONE: FAX: Earl F. Andersen, Inc. 9808 James Circle Bloomington,:M:N 55431 July 11, 1997 REFERENCE: (612) 884-7300 (612) 884-5619 0711DO Rll..EY LAKE PARK PLAYGROUND PROPOSAL DUE: July 11, 1997 DESCRIPTION TERMS: PLAY EQUIPMENT BY LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC. Custom Ship Playbooster Structure With Aluminum Posts And Tenderdecks Swing Unit Seahorse Spring Rider Dolphin Spring Rider 18' Long Track Ride Softstep Wood Fiber Resilient Surface, 10" Depth, Including Fabric Resilient Poured In Place Rubber For Wheelchair Accessibility, Includes Installation And Concrete Pad Installation Of Playground Equipment And Softstep Wood Fiber Shipment approximately 4-6 weeks after receipt of order. Installation price based on prevailing wage: F.O.B. Destination Net 30 Days PRICE EACH TOTAL $30,284 1,798.00 450.00 441.00 1,579.00 Subtotal Of Play $34,552.00 Equipment $3,113.00 3,048.00 9,287.00 Sub Total $50,000.00 Tax Included Freight Included Installation * Included TOTAL $50,000.00 • DISCLAIMER FOR UNKNOWN INST ALLA TION CONDITIONS: Thefollowing discl4imo applies £!!h!. when instalJaJion is quoted. Quotation is based on the area being free of all debris sucb. as, but not limited to the following: • Concrete footing or blocks of any type • Bedrock or rocky conditions of any type • Tree stumps, trees, cans, bottles, metal or any other debris. Utilities requiring any holes to be dug by hand • If area is not accessijll a bobcat and other equip t ecessary for installation • If water exists in site area or footings after they are dug. Or any other unknown conditions not listed or visible:., \ Signed By: 9808 James Circle' Bloomington, MN 55431 • Phone: 612-884-7300 • MN Wats: 1-800-862-6026 • Fax: 612-884-5619 II "Equal Opportunity Employer" / I : o <X) •• .q-W .q-....J -:::r-<.( U~ / / ~ o Cl w a.. o -' VI " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "-" " " " A " / "-V / ........ ---""" ..; ~ OJ "' OJ a:: I J "" ./ < \ I I / -- ,/ / / SLANT ENTRANCE PANEL 115118 Yf DIAlAElER TUNNEL SUDE \ \ I L "- "- « 1152<42 / (BELOW DECK) 1112<40 --' 6 I BAlCONY DECK > / ,-..J / 115225 PUPPET P~ANL / (BELOW DECK) \ 111325 CORKSCREW / / 111354 / <48" DECK / CusrDIoI CHAIN lADDER / PUPPET PANEL / / (BELOW 7CK) / I 115222 ~LANT WINDOW / PANEL ) / I ) "" / / 6' 115221 ~ 176 BLOCK IMAGE PANEL 115253 HOLE PANEL - (BELOW DECK) 121316 COlollolUNlCAnON 11951<4 POST PILOT PANEL 111363 TAU< TU~ 115222 \ SLANT WlNDOW\ 11&158 12000/AN~L FRONT BODY WIGGLE lADDER PANEL CUSOTlol RIGHT BOW PANEL 115253 HOLE PANEL (BELOW DECK) LEFT REAR "-P BOW POST Q. 18457 IP BOW /.Sf. h-'--:::r--~ FRONT BOW POST LEFT80W PANEL 1219<48 8" RISE KICKPl}.TE (K.P.l) OlY. (6) /'--- 115221 176 BLOCK IMAGE PANEL / / / pUPPET PANEL (BELOW DECK) /'" C44480 SCALE: 111414 SLiDEwtNDER ///r-l WHEELCHAIR AI SYNTHETIC R SURFACE WITH EDGE, 64" FA[ AREA 59 ~ 7/10/97 3/16" = 1'-0" F. Andersen, Inc .. All Rights Reserved. . i 1 ] ] J 1 To: Project: F 1 a n a g a n S a e s Inc . ~!~ if QUOTATION City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Riley Lake Park Playground Date: Contact: Phone: Fax: July 11, 1997 Mr. Stuart Fox 949-8445 ] We are pleased to provide the following quotation on items supplied by Little Tikes Commercial Play Systems J ] ] I 1 I ] ] ] ] J J Item Description Unit Price' Extension 239 40 1 Custom Kid Builder playstructure(s) per drawing KBRiley, dated 7-11-97. Includes: Galvanized steel upright posts. -Ages 5 -12 Playstructure -Kid Builder swing set with 2 belt, 2 tot and 1 tire swing -Ages 2 - 5 Playstructure -Kid Builder Ship -3 Spring Riders and 2 diggers Cu Yards 12" compacted to 9" Woodfiber play surfacing Cu Yards Sand for spring rider and digger play area Installation of above equipment only. Sitework, border, sub-base, geotextile fabric, access paths etc .. are not included. *Note: Bonding costs are not included in this proposal. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: • Quotation in effect until: September 30 th 1997 • Freight based on shipment to Eden Prairie, Minnesota + Shipment can be made in 4 -6 weeks + Terms: 20 Days Net Invoice. Sub Total Tax Freight Total • Purchase Orders should be made out to Little Tikes Commercial Play Systems. Thank Youl Flanagan Sales, Inc. 2845 lIamline Avenue North • Suite 108 • Roseville • ~·tN • 551 J 3 Pl1f'1rl(l' hI'! (...~~ (\1,)'~ • 1 Qn(\ ~)Q ~:::::-• t:'l .. ·· (,,') I~~'~ 1'::1:: • f~ \f'l;" t:"ll(l\'fr--r r';, \(1T $21,117.14 $2,837.43 $10,220.88 $1,834.90 $5,186.19 $ 602.00 $8,201.46 $50,000.00 6.5% includ inciuded $50,000.00 37 I j::t I DAn: '~II.f1 ""'. fLANAGAN DRAWING .: DUJrY srru : Ill) IUJlJl6I. IY L1'O'S SALES, INC. DlUlI'M IT: u..LJOIItDON PIOOJIlCT: a4I tLUVNE AYDtUE HCIl11I lIUI11:'08 JUUrY LADrAU: IlO!ETU.l.£. t.eC Mil' ElBU l'IlAIUB, IoIItOEtOTA 1-1OO-.128-.!:fA' ..------32' 69' 58"-------~ ~ , AND PLAY -, , A.RJaA --"'" .... ----r ........ , +=-- \ / I \..--_ I \ " .... , ...... , I I \ / \ " I. __ ~:, \ /\ 1---r-r-', ---j-----I \ 1 I! 1 _\ \ / ) ~:::::.-----_\'(' .... / -:::-" "'..... -........' / /" .... '...... .,.." I " I , , ! \ / , \1 \ " \ /1 \ I L ___ _ , / , , -... -~ ..... -_ ..... I ) / , / I / ..... / -, , / ~- / -~- I'=::U~~ I 1 ...... -1 ... ·Jma. I \ , , ... .... _--, 1 _I ~I \ \ .... -.. " ...... .... -, , \ \ I 1 1 1 ~-..... , , \ AGBSl-'I'U.Y~ ~ , " .... ,-_ ... I , /'_-------E.:.::.-j -" ""'7' m._~ .. - ) \ ( T \ It ~ -.ft'.... ,....--_ ~~ ,,/.... '"'------------.... , .... ------------'" .... ,/ ........ 1ItaU... =-= " ( ~ -~-~.N) ) : I .. ---, , , /) I .. ...--... ,-.z ... -...--_'1101''''''' "-, \ \ \ -. ....,. , , ) ,,---/ , , , _J I ( \ \ ,..l..",a.-,-, , I \ \ "- ~........ ---------..... '. .-I ~I I I I I ( __ I ~~ PlAY AIU!A \ .-.... ..., ..... " I / ... , I / , --- \ I , I , \ ~ //1 ' , \ , ' , ' "--",-----------.. - - t -~ , \ • ~., I \ t ~I ,/ ',, __ ,,' "r------------- , ' AOBS' -12PLAY AIIEA-------/ lEX.lISTING AOClESSmLlE SIDlEW AlLK .'55' ......... i 6) Cf) [J) d f!l Cf) ~ U U «i! Cl ~ ~ ~ "'--:.L---'------OL-...... A--.... ~ '---' "'--' ~ ...-"'--' 0..----.< ----.----------5~v-------------, RBTAININO WALL BY OWNER -EXACT I!UIV AllON I: LOCATION 1'0 BB DI!TI!RMINBD BI!NOIBS BYOWNBR "\\ ~ ~ ~>=B~ ~ \ STEPS \ I I I I ~ "- \ \ 1 / I ( \ \ ~ /' ~ --- .;------------------------,"-~m •• _ /' "-~ / , ' ~ -'> ~ ....... ""'" \ ~sUiP~'_ - - - - - - - - -wm"""", \ .;---DOUDLBWIDB I /' SINOLII RUNG SlJl)B W/IIOOD ,/ ""''''''-i I I I I I I j BOWBDOIAlll!NOB Il----jl LAJ)DI!R. 1JtACI( RIDB SUDINOPOU! I I UUNG I OlMBBR I ( atAlNNBT I cx..n.mBR I I I I I .?:#', IUNJl.))ER pECK J / ) 'IURNINO A CHINNINO I BARS PlLAY AREA ~ ~smLB ~ I I I I / //.:.::/~ BYOWNBll ~ I I \ \ \ "- t "-'- SINOU!WIDB WAVBSLIDB WIDlHOOD (LUTER. BRIOOI! WI GUARD RAILS ---, WOODPIBER. \ HANDICAP ACCBSSmLB TRANSPI!R. STATION \ \ JNVERTBD AROI a.IMBBR ~,-f71: F1NGBR. MAZB PANEL (BIlLOW DBCK) AOI!S , -12 SION PANEL WI WHBI!L l (2) BIlLOW DIlCIC"- SEAT PANELS "- ELBOWTUNNBL SUDB \ ,--=-I r-------------- \ "/, /' ~ " /' "-/' AGES 5 -121PlLAY AREA' --- - ----.;-BORDBR BY OWNBR "-"- \ \ \ 1 I I 8 ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ u 55' I ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ , "- '\ \ INOIUIXlR \ 'IORSB I " "-I '\j 1\ ./ /' \ ./ I I I I / / /' , "- I '\ 1)1(1Ol!R \ \ \ -----' '"--' «:»:-» v -~===---~~ I I ./ /' / BORDl!1l BY OWNER / /' / / / SIUP __ .---/ WHI!I!L / SIIlPSPINDU!PANEL-ABOVE SIUP HUll. PANEL-BELOW I ) j ./ /' / CURLY CUMBBR SINOU!WIDE WAYBSLIDB WIllI HOOD , "- '\ \ \ \ '---........ INI'ERDBCK ~-rBP "- '\ \ I I SHIP SPlNDU! PANBL -ABOVE \ I /SlllPlruu.PANEl.-BFLOW \ I \ I HANDICAP A<Xl!SSIBLI!, I IOOUBU!WJDB 'rnANS1'EIl STATION I I I I I I I SUDBW/HOOD I \ \ '\ "-, SIUPHUll. PANELS SIUP SPlNDU! ./ -, PANllU ( I I WOODFIBBll I I /' / 1 /' ./ I I I I I I I I 1 / ~~\ ) \ , / \ 1 WOODFIBBR \ \ ./ __ _ _ _ _ ~AlNINGWAIl.DY /' _ WNER -BXACf / .t:LOCATIONTO BlBVATION j BY OWNBR.. BB DIn1!RMlNIlD I I I I ) I ,) "11' KIDBUJU)BR TIRESWINO KID BUJU)8R SWING WlIH 2 BBLT SEATS KID BUJU)8R SWING WlIH 2 TOT SEATS \ \ I I I ~ '\ \ , I PO$smU! ~ I I I I j '" BOW PANI!L / AGES 2 -5 ]?LAY AllmA /' /' '\ /' "" /' ........ /' --./ -- ~ TSLBTAI.DIl BORDB1l BY OWNER '\ /:1 ~ / "-/' "-/' "-'-'-- -- -----.//~~~ IEXR§1rJING ACCIE§SmJLIE SIDlEW AILK BENam! BYOWNI!R -- ~ ~ /' I I ( \ ~ \ -~ TURNING.t: anN I BARS I I \ \ \ '\ t "- '- <E A - Miracle Recreation of Minnesota, Inc. .IRACLE Park and Playground Equipment EMAIL: miracle@minn.net .-noN eQUIPMENT co. Jay Webber 2175 Brooke Lane Hastings, MN 55033 (612) 438-3630 Fax (612) 438-3939 800-677-5153 July 10, 1997 City of Eden Prairie Dave Lepper 215 East Oak Street Redwood Falls. MN 56283 (507) 637-5159 Fax (507) 637-8673 800-576-1425 Parks, Recreation and DNR 8080 Mitchell Rd Eden Prairie, N1N 55344 (612) 949-8440 To Whom It May Concern: Brenda Wenner 2175 Brooke Lane Hastings, MN 55033 (612) 438-3630 Fax (612) 438-3939 800-677-5153 Bob Klein 1303 Lincoln Lane Hastings. MN 55033 (612) 437-4525 Fax (612) 437-2616 Thank you for the opportunity to give a proposal on the New Play Area at Riley Lake Park. If there are any changes to the layout, we will at that time review the pricing. 1 -Center StagelKids' Choice Playsystem 1 -Overhead Flyer with Chinning Bar System 1 -Fitness Cluster System 1 -2-Leg, 6 Seat Swing wll-ADA seat, 1-360° Tot, and 4-Belt seats 1 -13' Medium Geodesic Climber 1 -Twin Rider 2 -Spring Riders: Frog and Squirrel 4 -6' Inground PVC Coated Benches Total Equipment Cost N1N State Taxes 6.5% Freight to Eden Prairie, N1N Total Delivered Equipment and Sales Tax Installation of all new equipment, by Otto Landscaping 12" Washed Pea Gravel delivered and spread 56 Sq. Ft. of 4' fall height and 105 Sq. Ft. of8' fall height (Speckled Poured in place) Resilient Rubber Surfacing on a concrete base installed. Total Riley Lake Park Playground Bid $ 20,470.00 $ 1,769.00 $ 3,493.00 $ 1,061.90 $ 1,008.70 $ 344.40 $ 429.80 $ 753.20 $ 29,330.00 $ 1,906.45 $ 2,250.00 $ 33,486.45 $ 6,806.73 $ 6,800.00 $ 2,906.82 $ 50,000.00 This quote will expire 60 days of date of issue. Miracle is currently delivering in 4 to 5 weeks from date of purchase. Prices are based on purchase of thee complete proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (612) 438-3630. I~ bl ~!II~ i J.l i 1', I ; / I Sheet1 St. Croix Recreation Company, Inc. 225 N. Second Street Stillwater, MN 55082 a-mail stcroixrec@msn.com website www.stcroixrec.com (612)430-1247 Fax (612)430-9231 City of Eden Prairie Attn: Bob Lambert Quote Date Contact Project 717197 Phone # 949-8440 Fax 949-8390 In compliance with your request of June 24, 1997, for a price quotation on park furnishings supplied by Kompan, we submit the following: . No. Item No. Description Unit Price 1 M3032 Accessible Pirate Ship $ 14,995.00 1 M546 Engine Room Telegraph 1 M547 Binoculars 1 M548 Compass 1 M525 Steam Engine 1 M526 Railway Carriage 1 M527 Goods Wagon 1 M765 Work Shop 1 M146 Multispring Seesaw 1 M948 2 Place Swing Set . 1 M926 Toddler Swing 1 M535 Fire Truck 148 Cubic Yards of Shredded Resilient Material $ 15.00 Discount Quotation in effect until 'S E:; PI. 15, 1997 Sub Total We quote F.O.B. Eden Prairie, MN Sales Tax Shipment can be made in 30-45 Days !! Freight Terms are net Net 30 Da~s Installation I I I I I I I Total Purchase order should be made out at St. Croix Recreation Co. Inc. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Send the order to the above address or fax, thereby authorizing shipment and acceptance of the the terms. Please include Bill To:, Ship To:, and tax exempt # if applicable. By __________________________________ ____ Johnnie Johnsen Page 1 f).O Extended 14995.00 230.00 260.00 230.00 4 195.00 4595.00 1 895.00 3,995.00 3295.00 2495.00 1 015.00 4795.00 2220.00 (7 325.00) 36,890.00 2,397.85 1,200.00 9,500.00 49,987.85 City Riley Eden Lake Prairie Pork Scale 1 "=20' " M946 \ l: Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 21,1997 with Barr Engineering and will be meeting with them again tomorrow and ask them to go back to the original plans. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Evaluation of PlaY2round Proposals for Riley Lake Park Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 15, 1997, from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources; and five playground manufacturers' proposals. Lambert explained this is a new process and would like an opinion from the Commission when it's finished. They have invited representatives from the various playground manufacturers to attend and make a five minute presentation. Mr. Lehman representing Minnesota Wisconsin Playground, Inc; reviewed his playground proposal which included a play structure for 2-5 year olds and a play structure for 5-12 year olds. David Owens, representing Earl F. Anderson, Inc, reviewed his playground proposal which included a custom ship structure, a swing unit, a seahorse spring rider, a dolphin spring ride, and an 18 inch long track ride. Bill Johnson, representing Flanagan Sales, Inc, reviewed his playground proposal which included a 5-12 year old playstructure, a 2-5 year old playstructure with a builder ship, three spring riders and two diggers. Brenda Wenner, representing Miracle Recreation of Minnesota, Inc, reviewed her playground proposal which included a center stage/kid's choice play system for ages 2-12, a frog and squirrel spring rider, and a twin rider. This proposal included 12" washed pea gravel. She noted she would check to see if wood chips would be comparable in price. Lambert noted Johnnie Johnson representing St. Croix Recreation Company was not able to attend and make a presentation. Lambert put the playground proposal on the board which included a pirate ship, the same as they did in Miller Park. The Commission had a brief discussion about what they liked and didn't like about each playground proposal. Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 21, 1997 Hasse commented she liked the Little Tykes design of a boat because there seemed to be a lot of activities for the children. Hilgeman commented she didn't like the boat designs because she wants to get away from the ship theme. She liked the treehouse idea by Miracle Recreation because it picked up on the natural surroundings, and the design by Minnesota Wisconsin because it went with the straight farm theme. Brown was concerned about what age group really plays on the playstructures. Lambert said age 2-7 is the primary age group and noted 9-12 year olds are rarely on them. They have to be a little scary and challenging for the kids to enjoy them. If it's scary for a 10, 11, or 12 year old, then it's got to be dangerous and that's not put in playgrounds anymore. The Commission added up their votes on the playground equipment. The result was Miracle Recreation of Minnesota first, next was Minnesota Wisconsin Playground, Flanagan Sales, Earl F. Anderson, and St. Croix Recreation last. The Commission agreed to award the bid to Miracle Recreation of Minnesota with the stipulation that wood chips would be used instead of pea gravel for the same price. It the price changes, the bid will be awarded to Wisconsin Playground. MOTION: Koenig moved, seconded by Jacobson, to grant Miracle Recreation of Minnesota the bid for Riley Lake Park play equipment with the condition that they use wood chips instead of pea gravel at the same price, and if there is an additional price for wood chips, the Commission recommended Minnesota Wisconsin Playground receive the bid. Motion carried 5-0. VIII. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF A. Reports of Manaa:er of Parks and Natural Resources 1. Update on Deer Manaa:ement Proa:ram Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 17, 1997, from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources. Fox highlighted what has transpired over the last three years and some of the observations staff has made in regard to it. Koenig asked if staff had any input about the deer vehicle collisions. Fox CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: Aug. 5, 1997 Section: Consent Calendar Department: PRNR~ Award Bid for Playground Structure for Staring Item 15;. O. Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Lake Park Parks & Natural Resources RECOMMENDATION: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department staff recommends awarding the contract for play equipment for Staring Lake Park to St. Croix Recreation Company for $66,862. OVERVIEW: The concept design for the playground at Staring Lake was based on a water theme, and will be a handicapped accessible playground. The play equipment specified incorporates the theme and integrates all abilities through imagination on the same piece of play equipment, not "like sensations" on different parts of the playground. Specifications were written to include the equipment, delivery costs and installation. Bids were advertszed and opened July 23, 1997. Five bids were received. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Cash park fees and ADA funds will be used to pay for the equipment. Installation will begin as soon as the new play area is ready for equipment. Completion of installation is to be done prior to October 6, 1997. SAF:mdd StarBidiStuart96 1 EVALUATION OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT -!III I'" ;:}:-"""""""""""""-~. '.' .' . ,b;"""". """"',;""",,, <""""}"'# ,." ': .. ' ......:. .:. :.' . \ 1. Spec Has all required No HC. offof Has all required Has all required Short on 5-12 requirements equipment. No main ramp. No equipment. equipment. year, no access to flat seats on ramp access to 5-12, not a good toys. HC. access main structure. No flat seats on balance. to main structure No flat seats on toys. toys. 2. Number of Access to both, Lots of decks, Good variety, Lots of Nothing unique, play events and good balance on tunnels, slides, the most unique activities and not a big variety, variety 2-5 and 5-12, climbers, nothing events but not variety. mostly decks and good variety, unique. the most events. ramps. nothing unique. '" Quality Good, not excel-No exposed Only structure Plastic Little Good quality. ". craftsmanship lent. Exposed fasteners, good. that is wood but Tykes boat Cadillac of and durability fasteners, no flat No flat seats on has been durable questionable, structures. seats on toys. toys. in past. concerned about longevity. 4. Price $60,066 $67,000 $66,862 $67,000 $66,956 5. Site fit appeal Roof tops do not OK Would blend OK OK match site. into natural setting 6. Circulation 2-5 structure Boat concept Worked with Takes full ad-Didn't use theme movement blocks 5-12 already at Miller, river theme well. vantage of river well. through site structure. didn't take theme, 5+events advantage of river crossing river, theme. good overall. 7. Accomodate Fair Fair OK Good Only 4 people on people, children 5-12 equipment. 8. Creative play Not many Boat concept Lots of Boat offers Few opportunities. and social creative options, does not translate opportunities for some creative development 3 slides. to 3-D. creative play. play, play house good for social. 9. Service ------------------------45 days after ---------------------- performance order, 1 week to installation install. deadline. 10. Warranty OK OK 12 years on 10 years on wood plastic, 1 year on moving parts 11. Safety Fair OK Concern--wood OK OK 12. Maintenance None None Wood Plastic None BigToys Client: STARING lAKE Dlt.: 07121/97 Project #: NA Representative: St. Croix Recrea~ ModeJ: Custom Seal.: 1 IS" -I' Designer: LeWIS Cox ~ L.:::=======:jICOMlDiiiMN . 2-5 Years & Accessible Structure Arch Climber Mountain Climb Crawl Tunnel Triple Slide I Tum Across Bannister Slide For Quoting Only Not for construct/on Cargo Net Chain Walk Access Steps ChalnIPlpe Climber Steering Wheel Rung Ladder Seats Clubhouse Roof Signal Station! Bubble Panel •• 8- Signal Stat/on Sky Game Spiral Slide Roof· 5-12 Year Old Structure \ \ \ \ \ \ " \\ RESILIENT AREA REQUIRED: WILL VARY Printed in U.S.A. by KOMItAN""f. ©1997 Kompan, Inc., Olympia, WA, U.S.A. 1·800·426·9788 ~ City Council City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, 1vI;N 55344 Members of the City Council: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE CITY CENTER 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PROPOSAL FORM The undersigned has examined the specifications and quoting materials on file at the City offices pertaining to the playstructure materials and installation at Staring Lake Park, Eden Prairie, Minnesota and hereby purposes to furnish the following in conformance with said specifications: Materials and Installation of: 5 -12 year old play structure 2-5 year old playstructure 1-four seat swing set 3 -spring animals 2 -Diggers City Representative Authorizing acceptance of bid and commencement of construction according to said specifications Staring.spec!BarbaraCross July 3,1997 4 $ '2..',#°.00 $ 4t z.i"L.· 0 t> , OrlZed Signa~ .Johnnie W Johnsen Name (typed) ~",peiJr Title ~ C~f'" 1?~AT1.,.J Co./rJe... Firm Name ZZS-N. ~J S-r: Phone Number +30 -/2 11 SKY GAME This high energy social-physical event incorporates gross motor development with advanced language and negotiation skills. A novel multiple track activity that children need to group problem solve and cooperate to fully benefit from its play potential. Sky Game Coordination is the founding princip~e of this activity. Designed to promote higher order problem solving and group negotiation skills, the best play is facilitated when children work together. By using the spindle, strength and coordination are developed. Turn Across (p SPIRAL SLIDE A spin on the spiral slide is a highlight to every trip to the playground. Starting from a safe height, with high sides, this slide's twists and turns bring laughter and excitement. At the end of the ride, the slide's bed way flattens out for a assuring a safe return to the ground. The spiral slide is appropriate for children ages 5 to 12. Slides 7 TRIPLE SLIDE The third bed way adds an unconventional degree of complexity to this activity. The wavy surface and rumble strips provide auditory and tactile stimulation. Molded finger maze and hand prints add an element of surprise to the cave-like refuge space beneath the slide. STRAIGHT PLASTIC SLIDE Cool-to-the touch polyethylene makes for a smooth comfortable ride on the BigToys slide. For increased safety, BigToys slides offer low and steep rather than high and long slides. The quick drop offers the same thrill of a taller slide, but at a safer fall height children and adults can trust. BANISTER BARS W. ' f7' \\. .<t. .... ! ••.• :~~ In most circumstances, children are not allowed to slide down banisters -BigToys Banister Bars provide a safe, appropriate outlet for this favorite pastime. Strength and coordination skills increase while players invent new ways to play on this playground standard. q Cargo Net An efficient climber that requires hand over hand movement. It can provide a stage for role play scenarios as well as more complex group adventures and games. As a high speed exit point, it promotes hand-eye coordination and physical strength. Children must learn to judge their span of reach to initiate the activity. Climbers Curly Climber This attractive addition to the structure provides both embark and debark possibilities. Gross motor planning, hand-eye coordination and balance are necessary for successful usage. Its aesthetic appeal is apparent as children gravitate toward its flowing shape. MOUNTAIN CLIMB Sometimes doing things the hard way can be a whole lot more fun. The Mountain Climb offers a challenging alternative to climbing the stairs up to the play structure; youngsters ready for a physical challenge use a rope and cleats to scale the structure's wall. Children will grow into the physical challenge of the Mountain Climb. 10 ARCH CLIMBER Sturdy ladder-like access -with a style reminiscent of jungle gyms of old -is offered with the Arch Climber. Solid pipe construction offers a firm hand and foothold for children as they take an alternative challenge to the top of the structure. The Arch Climber is appropriate for 5-to 12-year-olds. PIPE/CHAIN LADDER Increase your structure's options for quick access with the convenience of a Pipe/Chain Ladder. This rung ladder offers a moving, climbing challenge and a fun alternative for access to the structure. The Pipe/Chain Ladder is appropriate for children ages 5 to 12. 1/ CHAINWALK It takes a steady hand and a great sense of balance to go the distance on the BigToys Chainwalk. The layout of the event encourages friendly contests. The Chainwalk's unique design also makes it a good place for chatting and talking with plenty of bars to lean on and overhead chains to grip and hang from. I~ Accessible Steps Accessible Ramp l?y ROOFS Cozy enclosures like the BigToys Roof offer an ideal spot for a quite chat. The roofs lean-to style offers a safe, private hideaway from the rest of the playground. Optional seats underneath provide a comfortable resting place. - WOOD SEATS Wood seats are built into BigToys structures to serve as convenient resting spots between bouts of active physical play. The seats are deSigned to complement the rest of the BigToys structure and can be strategically placed throughout the design. VERTICAL ACCESS LADDER Increase your structure's options for quick access with the convenience of a Vertical Access Ladder. This sturdy rung ladder offers a climbing challenge and a fun alternative for access to the structure. PLAYSHELL DOUBLE SEAT The Playshell Double Seat is the ideal place to stretch out and relax to take a breather in the shade. Contoured curves create cozy spaces for resting and chatting. The unique design of the Playshell Double Seat is appropriate for children ages 5 to 12. · , , ( , , .~.~.~'~' •.... CRAWL TUNNEL Playmates will have to shift gears as they make a smooth transition between platforms in the Crawl Tunnel. Anything could await at the other side, but there is only one way to find out what it could be. Tunnel crawls are made of cool-to~the-touch polyethylene and offer smooth connections and molded-in handholds. 1(, • M 130 Crazy Scrambler A favorite of the car and truck crowd, this eye-catching spring is popular in situations where distressed children need to rock and comfort themselves independently while maintaining proximity to their friends. Two children can also sit together while they adventure along the road of their choice. • M 131 Crazy Plane A more difficult hand grip increases the challenge level of this spring. Back and forth the plane travels, promoting feelings of flight and speed while maintaining a sense of safety. Stimulation of the vestibular sense and the development of upper body strength are benefits of this fantasy flight. • M 132 Crazy Tractor A good multi-age item with a distinctive shape can stimulate more active role play. Its curved grip promotes strengthening of the lower arm and upper body. Cause and effect concepts are promoted while stimulating the vestibular sense. Children will enjoy the feelings of speed and movement. J1 Accessibility The BigToys Approach In general, we operate from two perspectives. One is that children's play operates across four domains: physical, emotional, social and cognitive development. We stress the importance of meeting the needs of the whole child in the playground context. Secondly, the goal of these designs is to increase the frequency and enjoyment of contact among children of all skill levels, across all the developmental domains. This requires thoughtfulness, knowledge of children's needs and a commitment to principles of integration, as well as accessibility. Several of Big Toys' Marquee Events have ample ground level playing space for children who cannot access the more challenging intermediate activities. The Send and Receive Station promotes sophisticated cognitive and language development as well as high levels of social interaction. Reading, spelling, and negotiating are all part of the group game playing that this activity stimulates. Seating and novel enclosures create space for socializing, imagination and observation. BigToys is also particularly adapted for users who have even the weakest upper body strength including those who are able to leave their wheelchairs for short periods. There are large under deck spaces at ground level, that if surfaced appropriately will allow for access and social play opportunities for all children. The Tum Across can be fully utilized by children who are not confined to wheelchairs. Those confined to chairs can engage socially or can "bump up" to the deck if desired. Only by talking and working together can the objective of moving the rider across the "abyss" be achieved. The destination stations are furnished with deck and seats that allow for participation by children who prefer to socialize and observe the action around The Triple Slide has ample opportunities for interaction among children, sensory stimulation across the rumble strips and an engaging, accessible, ground level refuge furnished with finger games. Rich social interactions between the timid and the bold are observed in this popular cove. Beyond the play opportunities offered by the play events themselves, BigToys strives to enhance the accessibility for children through the means of wheelchair accessible entrances to the structure. These additional architectural components include a Ramp, Transfer Station, and Accessible Stairs. By thoughtfully placing these components on the playground, increased access to the play events can be achieved. These structures provide access and play opportunities for children within a wide range of ability and skill levels. The key issue is the integration of play. We have designed BigToys play equipment to challenge those children with less developed skills while supporting the more confident users to engage in satisfying interactions with their less able peers, in the domains where they share interest. rz BIGTOYS Installation & Warranty Warranty· . • 12 year guarantee from the date of original shipment on wood and steel pipe r components against failure due to deterioration from fungi or insects which impairs the structural integrity of the unit. • 5 year guarantee from the date of original shipment against failure of rotationally molded components. • 2 year guarantee from the date of original shipment against defects in materials and workmanship of properly assembled equipment parts. Installation Resilient surfacing must be installed under playground equipment. Do not install playground equipment on concrete, asphalt or similar surfaces. When KOMP AN provides the installation or supervision, it is the responsibility of the purchaser to inform KOMP AN of the location of all pipes, wires, cables or other underground obstructions before installation can take place. KOMP AN will not be responsible for damage to such obstructions if not informed at least one week before installation takes place. All installation prices are quoted for normal ground conditions. KOMP AN reserves the right to renegotiate contracts if abnormal conditions are present. DATE: 08/05197 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: 1SJ, E. SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 97-5436 Engineering Division Award of Utility Body to fit City Supplied Ford F350 Cab and Chassis Mary Krause Recommended Action: Award of I.C. 97-5436, Utility Body to fit City Supplied Ford F350 Cab and Chassis to ABM Equipment and Supply Company in the amount of $33,159.84 based on the low bid indicated on their proposal form. Overview: Two bids were received and are tabulated as follows: • ABM Equipment and Supply Company $33,159.84 • Truck Utilities Manufacturing Company $33,270.60 Fmancial Issues: The budgeted amount for this piece of equipment was estimated at $47,000, which included the Cab and Chassis and Utility Box. The cab and chassis was purchased earlier in 1997 for $24,934. The low bid of this utility box brings the total package cost to $58,093.84 which is $11,093.84 over budget. However, $5,250 of this total bid price includes items such as a Whelen Strobe System, Power Inverter and Built-in Tool Box which were anticipated to be "add on's" after the unit delivery. An all hydraulic crane and air compressor system is included at an added cost of $2,000. An electric system was anticipated at time of budget preparation, but cannot be accommodated in the engine compartment due to lack of space. This system can be salvaged to a new cab and chassis at the time of replacement of the cab and chassis. The net result is a cost of approximately 12 % over budget. However, the equipment is a mainstay in the Fleet and year to date budget performance indicates that the overall budget spending will not be exceeded. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 97-5436 -Utility Body to fit City Supplied Ford F350 Cab and Chassis bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to ABM Equipment and Supply Company as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with ABM Equipment and Supply Company, in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $33,159.84 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 5, 1997. Iean L. Harris, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk DATE: 08/05197 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: 1V.r DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5398 Engineering Division Approve Construction Plans for a Traffic Signal of TH 212 and Fountain Rodney W. Rue Place Recommended Action: Approve resolution approving construction plans and specifications for a traffic signal at the TH 212 and Fountain Place intersection. Overview: After this project failed, for the past two years, to get selected as a MnDOT Cooperative Agreement project, the City Council, on February 18, 1997, authorized staff to proceed with this project as a City project that would be financed entirely with City funds. Primary Issues: We have completed the design and are requesting plan approval at this time. We are proposing to schedule a bid opening for August 28, 1997, with the contract award to be hand-delivered at the September 2, 1997 City Council meeting. At that meeting we also anticipate approval of a signal maintenance agreement with MnDOT. Fmancial Issues: The total project cost is approximately $165,000, which includes design, construction, and MnDOT-supplied signal cabinet and controller. This project is proposed to be financed entirely with Tax Increment Funds. We hereby recommend approval of the plans and specifications for Improvement Contract No. 96-5398, Traffic Signals at TH 212 and Fountain Place. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the City Engineer through Westwood Professional Services has prepared plans and specifications for the following improvements to wit: I.C. 96-5398 -Traffic Signals at TH212 and Fountain Place State Project No. 2744-53 and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on fIle for public inspection in the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., August 28, 1997, at City Hall after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30 P.M., Tuesday, September 2, 1997, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City for 5% (percent) of the amount of such bid. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk DATE: 08/05/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: 1JJ.G. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5344 Engineering Division Approve Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MnDOT and Hennepin Rodney W. Rue County for Traffic Signals at CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and TH 212 Ramps and at Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive Recommended Action: Approve resolution approving Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 76515 for traffic signals at the CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and TH 212 ramp intersections and at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection. Overview: MnDOT has prepared construction plans for the construction of traffic control signals at the CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and TH 212 ramp intersections. In addition, the City of Eden Prairie prepared construction plans for the upgrading of the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive traffic signals and intersection (roadway) improvements to be included with the MnDOT plans and bid as one project. The City Council approved both the MnDOT -designed and City- designed construction plans on June 3, 1997. Primary Issues: This project requires that three (3) agreements need to be approved by the City of Eden Prairie. This particular agreement covers the installation of new signals at the CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and TH 212 ramp intersections, remove and install a new signal at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection, and interconnect these three (3) new signals with the existing signal at the CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and City West Parkway/Bryant Lake Drive intersection. Fmancial Issues: This agreement defmes the financial and maintenance responsibilities for MnDOT, Hennepin County, and the City of Eden Prairie for these four (4) signals (3 new and 1 is·existing). The City's share for this particular agreement is estimated at $261,670.50. We propose to use State Aid funds to finance this portion of the project. We hereby recommend that the City Council approve MnDOT's Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 76515 in the estimated amount of $261,670.50. , CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ~INCOUNTY,~OTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT FOR SIGNALS AT THE CSAH 61 (SHADY OAK ROAD) AND TH 212 RAMP INTERSECTIONS AND AT THE SHADY OAK ROAD AND FLYING CLOUD DRIVE INTERSECTION I.C. 94-5344 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie have cooperated to prepare construction plans and specifications for signal and roadway improvements along CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) at the TH 212 ramp intersections, as well as signal and roadway improvements at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved said plans and specifications for the improvements of CSAH 611Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive; and WHEREAS, a traffic control signal agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County, and the City of Eden Prairie has been prepared which identifies the maintenance and fmancial obligations of each agency for the signal construction of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that Traffic control Signal Agreement No. 76515 for S.P. 2763-35 is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk GOLDEN VRLLEY TRRFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:42 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFF!C CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 76515 BETWEEN P.02 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE TO Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 212 East Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) and on Trunk Highway No. 212 West Ramps at Sbady Oak Road; Remove the existing Traffic Control Signal and Install a new Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption and Signing on Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drivej Install Interconnect on County State Aid Highway No. 61/Shady Oak Road from Flying Cloud Drive to City West Parkway -Bryant Lake Drive; and Provide Maintenance and Electrical Energy for the existing Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights and Signing on County State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) at City ~';est Park-,.,ray - Bryant Lake Drive in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesoca. s.P. 2763-35 S.A.P. 27-661-29, 181~106-02 and 181-020-20 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE County of Hennepin City of Eden Prairie $ 39,959.51 S26L 494.51 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Cov~red GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 JuI 29 '97 10:42 P.03 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State", and the county of Hennepin, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and t.he city of Eden prairie, hereinafter referred to as the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 (1994) authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the·purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system; and WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to install new traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 212 East Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) and on Trunk Highway No. 212 West Ramps at Shady Oak Road; remove the existing traffic cont.rol signal and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption and signing on Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive; and install interconnect on County State Aid Highway No. 61/Shady Oak Road from Flying Cloud Drive to City West parkway -Bryant Lake Drivei and WHEREAS, the City requests and the State agrees to the installation of Emergency Vehicle Pre~emption Systems. hereinafter referred to as the "EVP Systems", as a part of the new traffic control signal installations on Trunk Highway No. 212 76515 -1-q GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:42 P.04 East Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) , on Trunk Highway No. 212 West Ramps at Shady Oak Road and on Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth: and WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide one (1) pedestal shaft and base, a .. master controller and three (3) new cabinets and control equipment to operate said traffic control signals; and WHEREAS, the County, City and the State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the new traffic control signals with street lights, EVP Systems and signing, and the interconnect, and participate in the maintenance and operation of the existing traffic control signal with street lights and signing, as hereinafter set forth: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1_ The State shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal which shall constitute "Preliminary Engineering". The State shall also perform the construction inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth, which shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service poles or pads, shall 76515 ~2- 1) GOLDEN VRLLEY TRRFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:43 P.05 constitute the actual ·Construction Cost» and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3-The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall perform the traffic control signal and interconnect work provided for under State Project No-2763~3S and State Aid Project No.'s 27-661-29, 181-106-02 and 181-020-20 with the Construction Costs shared as follows: a) Trunk Highway No. 212 West Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) . System "A". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System and signing. Estimated Construction Cost is $130.000.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 50 percent_ County's share is 25 percent. City's share is 25 percent. b) Trunk Highway No. 212 East Ramps Shady Oak Road. System "B". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights. EVP System and signing. Estimated Construction Cost is $115,250.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 50 percent. City's share is 50 percent. c) Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive. System "C". Remove the existing traffic 76515 -3-(, GOLDEN VRLLEY TRRFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:43 P.06 control signal and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System and signing. Estimated Construction cost is $147,500.00 which includes State furnished materials. City's share is 100 percent. d) On County State Aid Highway No. 61/Shady Oak Road from Flying Cloud Drive to City west Parkway -Bryant Lake Drive. Install interconnect. Estimated Construction Cost is $13,500.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 33.34 percent. County's share is 33.33 percent. City'S share is 33.33 percent. 4. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, the County and City shall each advance to the State an amount equal to their portion of the project costs. The County's and City's total portion shall consist of the sum of the following: a) The County's and City's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices and the estimated State furnished material costs. b) Eight (8) percent of their share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 76515 -4- 1 GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:43 P.07 5. Upon completion and final acceptance of the project, the County's and City's final share shall consist of the sum of the following: a) The County's and city'S share (as specified in Paragraph 3), based on the final payment to the Contractor and the actual State furnished materials costs. b) Eight (8) percent of their final share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. The amount of the funds advanced by the County and city in excess of the county's and City's share will be returned to the County and City without interest and the County and City agrees to pay to the State that amount of their final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the county and City. 6. The City shall provide an adequate electrical ... power supply to the service pads or poles, and upon completion of said new traffic control signals with street lights installations (Systems "A", liB" and "e") and said existing traffic control signal with street lights installation (County State Aid Highway NO. 61 (Shady Oak Road) at City West Parkway -Bryant lake Drive} shall provide necessary electrical power for their operation at the cost and expense of the city. 76515 -5- GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:44 P.OS 7. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3a t 3b and 3d (Systems "A", "B" and Interconnect) hereof, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessarYi (2) relamp the new traffic control signals and street lights; and (3) clean .. and paint the new traffic control signals, cabinets and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain the signing and interconnect, and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 8. Upon completion. of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3c (System "C") hereof, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; (2) relamp ~he new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm exte~sion. It shall be the State's responsibility, to maintain the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment, repair knockdowns of the traffic control signal system, perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance, and be responsible for the timing and operation of the new traffic control signal, all on a reimbursable basis with the City. 76515 -6- GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:44 P.09 9. At the existing traffic control signal with street lights and signing on county State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) at City West Parkway -Bryant Lake Drive, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; (2) relamp the existing traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the existing traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extension. It shall be the State's responsibility, to maintain the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment, repair knockdowns of the traffic control signal system, perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance, and be responsible for the timing and operation of the existing traffic control signal, all on a reimbursable basis with the County. 10. The EVP Systems provided for in Paragraph 3 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements; a} All maintenance of the EVP Systems for Systems "A~ and "B"shall be done by State forces. b) All maintenance of the EVP System for System "C" -Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive (including timing) shall be done by State Forces on a reimbursable basis with the City. 76515 -7- 10 GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:45 P.l0 c) Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. The City will provide the State's Assistant Division Engineer or his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units. d) Malfunction of the EV? Systems shall be reported to the State immediately. e) In the event said EV? Systems or components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the city of written notice thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP Systems. Upon removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receivers, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the State. f) All timing of said EVP Systems for Systems "A" and "B" shall be determined by 76515 -8- II GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:45 P.ll the State through its commissioner of Transportation. 11. The State and the City shall enter into Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 76517-R for the intersection of Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive (System "C") covering maintenance of the traffic signal cabinet and con~rol equipment, maintenance of the EVP System, repair of knockdowns of the traffic control signal system, performance of all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance not performed by the city, and the responsibility for the timing and operation of the traffic control signal and EVP System by State Forces and the terms and conditions covering payment therefore by the City. 12. The State and the County shall enter into Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 76516-R for the intersection of County State Aid Highway No. 61 (Shady Oak Road) at City West Parkway -Bryant Lake Orive covering maintenance of the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment. repair of knockdowns of the traffic cor.trol signal system, performance of all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance not performed by the City, and the responsibility for the timing and operation of the traffic control signal by Scate Forces and the terms and conditions covering payment therefore by the County. 13. In the event the State advertises for bids for all or a portion of the work in Paragraph 3 hereof, the State shall submit to the Hennepin County engineer a certified copy of the 76515 ~9- I~ .. GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:45 P.12 low bid received and an abstract of all bids received by the State, together with the State's request for concurrence by the County in the Award of a construction contract. Award of the contract shall not be made until the County Engineer advises the state in writing of its concurrence. 14. Final plans and specifications for construction of the traffic control signal work provided in Paragraph 3 hereof shall have County approval prior to award of construction contract by the State. Said county approval shall be evidenced by signature of the County En~ineer in the designated space therefor on the original plan. 15. The construction work provided for herein shall be under the direction and supervision of the State. It is agreed, however, tbat the County shall have the right to periodically inspect the cost sharing construction work provided for in Paragraph 3 hereof. The State shall have the exclusive right to determine whether the work has been satisfactorily performed by the State's Contractor. 16. The State shall insert in any contract with the successful bidder a clause requiring the successful bidder to hold the County and City harmless and also clauses requiring the successful bidder to provide and maintain insurance, all as follows: a) The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the County and City, their 76515 -10- GOLDEN VRLLEY TRRFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:46 P.13 • officers, agents and employees from all suits, actions and claims of any character brought because of injuries or damages received or sustained by a person, persons, or property on account of the operations of the said Contractor or any subcontractor or their agents or employees, or an account of or in consequence of any neglect in safeguarding the work: or through use of unacceptable materials in constructing the work; or because of any act or omission, neglect, or misconduct of said Contractor or any subcontractor or their agents or employees, or because of any claims arising or amounts recovered from infringements of patent, trademark, or copyright; or because of any claims arising or amounts recovered under the Worker's Compensation Acti or under other law, ordinance, order to decree. b) The Contractor shall purchase and maintain insurance for and in behalf of himself and the County, as additional assured, and with a cross liability endorsement protecti~g the county from claims or damages for personal injuries, including accidental death, as well 76515 -11- J~ GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:46 P.14 as for claims for property damage which may arise out of or result from the Contractor's operations under the contract, whether such operations be by the Contractor or by any subcontractor or by anyone directly employed by any of them, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Said insurance shall protect against claims as set forth below: 1. Workers' Compensation including Employer's Liability Insurance: Bodily Injury by Accident $100,000 each accident Bodily Injury by Disease $500.000 policy limit/ $100,000 each employee Note: An all states endorsement is required if the Contractor is domiciled outside the State of Minnesota. 2. Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance: (A) Commercial General Liabil it"!: ~ Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage--Each Occurrence Limit $1,000,000 _ General Aggregate Limit Sl,OOO,OOO 76515 -12- 15 GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:46 P.15 _ products--Completed Operations Aggregate Limit. $1,000,000 _ Personal and Advertising Injury Limit $1,000,000 Coverages above shall also include: _ premises--Operations _ contractual Liability (including oral and written contracts) _ Explosion, Collapse, Underground Property Damage (XCU) (B) Automobile Liability including Hired Car and Employers Non- ownership Liability: _ Combined Bodily Injury and property Damage--Each occurrence Limit c) All cert.ificates of insurance shall provide that the insurance company shall give t.he county thirty (30) days prior written not.ice of cancellation, non-renewal of any material changes in the policy and exclude wording "endeavOr t.o" and "but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or 76515 -13~ It, ... GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:46 P.16 liability of any kind upon the company, its agents or representatives". d) The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements, and it is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to purchase and maintain additional insurance that may be • necessary in connection with this contract. e) The Contractor shall not commence work until the Contractor has obtained and filed an acceptable certificate of insurance with the county. All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of policies shall be submitted to the County upon written request. f) The County agrees to pay to the State the tot~l amount of the liability insurance coverage premium costs, describ~d herein, incurred by the State's Contractor for State Project No. 2763-35 in procuring and maintaining for the duration of the Contractor's contractual obligation to said State project. As such time, be it one or more, as the said State's Contractor furnishes the State with a certified statement of the insurance premium costs the 76515 -14- 11 •.... __ -----------------:~~~~~;7~--------~J~Ull:29 97 TEL:612 797 3181 12:05 No.009 p.04 MNDOT/GV ... Contractor has incurred on procuring the -aforesaid insurance coverage, the State will invoice the County for the total amount of the insurance premium costs set forth in said certified statement from the Contractor, and the County shall; upon receipt of said invoice, promptly make payment thereof to the State. 17. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of the County or City and any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any-and all claims made by any fourth party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of Baid employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the County or City. The State shall not be responsible under the Worker's Compensat.ion Act for any employees of the County or City. 18. All timing of the new traffic control signals (Systems "A" and "B") provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportatjon, and no changes shall be made therein excopt with the approvCJ.l of the State. 76515 -15-· ., ... ,_'." J<t GOLDEN VRLLEY TRRFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:57 P.1S COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST; By; Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM; By: Assistant County Attorney Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Assistant County Attorney Date: By: Chair of its County Eoard Dat:.~; (County Seal) And: Associate/County Administrator Date: .And: Director, Department of Public Works and county Engineer Date: By: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Transportation Division Engineer Date; CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By ----------------------------Mayor (City Seal) By -------------------------- 76515 -16- Iq city Manager GOLDEN VRLLEY TRRFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:57 P.19 STATE OF MINNESOTA D£PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL! Assistant Division Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: Assistant Attorney General State of Minnesota DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By __________________ ~ ______ - Assistant Commissioner Dated ____________________ ~ __ DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION By __ --____________________ __ Dated ______________________ __ DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE By ________________________ _ Dated ______________________ __ 76515 -17- ~O DATE: 08/05/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM No:1fJ.11 . DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5344 Engineering Division Approve Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement with MnDOT for Rodney W. Rue Traffic Signals at Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive ~-=-=-=-=-=-===-===-======== Recommended Action: Approve resolution approving Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 76517-R for maintenance responsibilities for the traffic signal at Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive. Overview: MnDOT has prepared construction plans for the construction of traffic control signals at the· CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and TH 212 ramp intersections. In addition, the City of Eden Prairie prepared construction plans for the upgrading of the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive traffic signals and intersection (roadway) improvements to be included with the MnDOT plans and bid as one project. The City Council approved both the MnDOT -designed and City- designed construction plans on June 3, 1997. Primary Issues: This project requires that three (3) agreements need to be approved by the City of Eden Prairie. This particular agreement defines the maintenance responsibilities for the upgraded traffic signal at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection. MnDOT will be providing the major maintenance for this signal on a reimbursable basis. Financial Issues: This agreement does not include any payment to MnDOT other than future reimbursable maintenance costs on an "as needed" basis. We hereby recommend that the City Council approve MnDOT's Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 76517-R for reimbursable maintenance costs. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SIGNALS AT THE SHADY OAK ROAD AND FLYING CLOUD DRIVE INTERSECTION I.C. 94-5344 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie have cooperated to prepare construction plans and specifications for signal and roadway improvements along CSAH 61 (Shady Oak: Road) at the TH 212 ramp intersections as well as signal and roadway improvements at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved said plans and specifications for the improvements on CSAH 611Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive; and WHEREAS, a traffic control signal maintenance agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Eden Prairie has been prepared which identifies the maintenance and [mancial obligations of each agency for the City-owned traffic signal at the Shady Oak: Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that Traffic Control Signal Maintenance Agreement No. 76517-R for S.P. 2763.;35, which provides for maintenance of the traffic control signal at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection by State forces on a reimbursable basis, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:58 P.21 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NO. 76517-R BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FOR Maintenance of the Traffic Control Signal by State Forces on a reimbursable basis at the intersection of Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive in Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2763-35 S.A.P. 27-661-29, 181-020-20 and 181-106-02 C.P. I.C. 94-5344 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE None AMOUNT ENCU~ffiEREO None Otherwise Covered GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:58 P.22 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the ·State", and the City of Eden Prairie, hereinafter referred to as the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.39, the Commissioner of Transportation may upon request provide technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision to any county or municipality; and WHEREAS, the City and the State did enter into Agreement No. 76515, dated __________________________________ __ to participate in, among other things, the maintenance and operation of traffic control signal on Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive within the limits of the City; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provides that the State shall maintain the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment, maintain the emergency vehicle pre-emption, rep~ir knockdowns of the traffic control signal, perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance not performed by the City, and be responsible for the timing and operation of said traffic control signal and emergency v8hicle pre-emption, all at the cost and expense of the City; and WHEREAS, said traffic control signal is an integral part of an interconnected traffic control signal system maintained by the State; and 76517-R ~1- GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:59 P.23 WHEREAS, it lS considered mutually desirable that the State shall maintain the traffic signal cabinet and control equipment, maintain the emergency vehicle pre-emption, repair knockdowns of the traffic control signal system and p~rform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance not performed by the City, for the City according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forthj NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall provide labor, material and equipment to maintain and keep in repair the traffic control signal cabinet and control equipment, the emergency vehicle pre-emption, knockdowns of the traffic control signal system and all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance not performed by the City, and shall be responsible for the timing and operation of the traffic control signal and emergency vehicle pre-emption on Shady Oak Road at Flying Cloud Drive. 2. Upon completion of work performed, the State shall submit to the City a detailed invoice in duplicate listing all labor, equipment and materials used where work on the traffic control signal was performed by State forces in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. 76517-R ~2- 5 GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:59 P.24 The City agrees to reimburse the State for services provided hereunder as follows: a) Direct labor charges shall be reimbursed at the actual hourly rates paid to State forces performing the work. b) Fringe benefits shall be reimbursed as a • percentage of direct labor charges, such percentage to be determined by the State Accounting and Finance Section at the beginning of each State fiscal year from the current cost accounting data. c) Overhead costs shall be reimbursed as a percentage of the total of direct labor charges, fringe benefits and the cost of any materials. equipment and personal expense provided, such percentage to be determined by the State Finance and Accounting Section at the beginning of each Scate fiscal year from the current cost accounting data. d) Any material used shall be reimbursed at their actual cost to the State. 3. Upon receipt of said invoice, the City shall promptly pay the State the full amount due. In the event the City fails to fulfill any monetary obligation created by this Agreement, the Commissioner of Transportation may withhold 76S17-R -3- ~ GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 10:59 P.25 payment of State Aid rooney to the City to the extent provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.38, Subdivision 6. 4. Either party may terminate the terms and conditions covering maintenance and operation for the traffic control signal covered by this agreement upon providing 30 days notice to other party. The City's termination must be • accomplished by a resolution of the City Council. The State's termination must be accomplished by a letter from Mn/DOT's Assistant Commissioner. Upon termination it shall be the City's responsibility, at its costs and expense, to maintain and keep in repair the traffic control signal. Upon termination, the timing of the traffic control signal and emergency vehicle pre-emption shall be determined by the City's Engineer. 5. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid maintenance work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. 6. This Agreement shall continue in force for a. term of one year. commencing on the date it is signed by the Assistant Commissioner of Transportation. Upon the expiration of such 76S11-R -4- 1 GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 11:00 P.26 term, this Agreement shall continue in force from year to year provided that in no event shall this Agreement be extended beyond the period for which either party may legally bind itself. 76517-R -5-o GOLDEN VALLEY TRAFFIC Fax:612-797-3152 Jul 29 '97 11:00 P.27 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE APPROVED AS TO FORM: By ________________ ~ ________ _ Mayor City Attorney (City Seal) By __________________________ _ City Manager STATE OF MINNESO~A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR~ATION By __________________________ _ Assistant Division Engineer Assistant Commissioner Dated ______ --______________ __ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: Assistant Attorney General State of Minnesota DEPARTMENT O~ ADMINISTRATION By ________________________ __ Dated ______________________ __ DEPAR~MENT OF FINANCE By ________________________ __ Dated ______________________ __ 76517-R -6- q DATE: 08/05/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: IV.I. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5344 Engineering Division Approve Cooperative Construction Agreement with MnDOT for Roadway Rodney W. Rue Construction Associated with the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive Traffic Signals Recommended Action: Approve resolution approving Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 76526 for roadway construction associated with the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive traffic signals. Overview: MnDOT has prepared construction plans for the construction of traffic control signals at the CSAH 61 (Shady Oak Road) and TH 212 ramp intersections. In addition, the City of Eden Prairie prepared construction plans for the upgrading of the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive traffic signals and intersection (roadway) improvements to be included with the MnDOT plans and bid as one project. The City Council approved both the MnDOT -designed and City- designed construction plans on June 3, 1997. Primary Issues: This project requires that three (3) agreements need to be approved by the City of Eden Prairie. This particular agreement defmes the maintenance and financial responsibilities for the roadway construction associated with the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive traffic signals and intersection improvements, which MnDOt will be constructing. Financial Issues: This agreement defines the City's share of the roadway construction costs to be estimated at $290,707.27. We propose to use State Aid funds to finance this portion of the project. We hereby recommend that the City Council approve MnDOT's Cooperative Construction Agreement 1Il0. 76526 in the estimated amount of $290,707.27. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVE COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ON SHADY OAK ROAD AND FLYING CLOUD DRIVE I.C. 94-5344 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the City of Eden Prairie have prepared final plans and specifications for signal and roadway improvements along CSAH 61 at the TH 212 ramp intersection, as well as signal and roadway improvements at the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive intersection, within the corporate limits of the City of Eden Prairie. WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has approved said plans and specifications for the improvements of CSAH 61/Shady oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive; and WHEREAS, a cooperative construction agreement has been prepared which identifies the maintenance and fInancial obligations for the roadway construction of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that said Cooperative Construction Agreement No. 76526 for S.P. 2763-35(T.H.212 =005, which provides for payment by the City to the State for the City's share of the costs of the grading, storm sewer, bituminous paving, curb and gutter, and other associated construction along and adjacent to Shady Oak Road under State Aid Project No. 181-106-01, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk DESIGN SERVICES SECTION STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Mn/DOT AGREEMENT NO. 76526 S.P. 2763-35 (T.H. 212=005) S.A.P. 181-106-01 The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, and The City of Eden Prairie Re: City cost for grading, storm sewer, bituminous paving and curb and gutter construction by the State on Shady Oak Road C.P. 94-5344 State Funds AMOUNT ENCUMBERED (None) ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE $290.707.27 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City". 76526 WHEREAS, the State is about to perform milling, bituminous overlay, turn lane and traffic signal construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to Shady Oak Road from Engineer Station 2+837.589 (Bryant Lake Drive) to Engineer Station 3+155.00 (Flying Cloud Drive) within the corporate City limits in accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special provisions designated as State Project No. 2763-35 (T.H. 212=005) and State Aid Projects No. 27-661-29, No. 181-020-20 and No. 181-106-02; and WHEREAS, at the request of the City, the State included in its contract the grading, storm sewer, bituminous paving, curb and gutter and traffic signal construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Shady Oak Road from Engineer Station 3+155 (Flying Cloud Drive) to Engineer Station 3+443 within the corporate City limits in accordance with State-approved plans, specifications and/or special provisions designated by the City as Improvement Contract No. 94-5344 and by the State as State Aid Project No. 181-106-01 and; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to pay 100 percent of the costs of construction and associated construction engineering for State Aid Project No. 181-106-01 as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, in connection with the construction to be performed under State Aid Project No. 181-106-01, the traffic signal construction to be performed at the intersection of Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive will be covered under Agreement No. 76515 between the State and the City; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20, subdivision 2 (1996) authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system. IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I -CONSTRUCTION BY THE STATE Section A. Contract Award 76526 The State shall advertise for bids and award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder for State Project No. 2763-35 (T.H. 212=005) and State Aid Projects No. 27-661-29, No. 181-020-20, No. 181-106-01 and No. 181-106-02 in accordance with State-approved plans, specifications and/or special provisions which are on file in the office of the Commissioner of Transportation at St. Paul, Minnesota, and are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. Section B. Direction and Supervision of Construction The State shall direct and supervise all construction activities performed under the construction contract, and perform all construction engineering and inspection functions in connection with the contract construction. All contract construction shall be performed in compliance with the approved plans, specifications and/or special provisions. Section C. Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc. The State shall make changes in the plans and/or contract construction, which may include the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement, and shall enter into any necessary addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements with the State's contractor which are necessary to cause the contract construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. However, the State's Metropolitan Division Engineer at Roseville or his authorized representative will inform the appropriate City official of any proposed addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements to the construction contract which will affect the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement. 76526 Section D. Satisfactory Completion of Contract The State shall perform all other acts and furictions necessary to cause the construction contract to be completed in a satisfactory manner. ARTICLE II -INSPECTION BY THE CITY The City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement shall be open to inspection by the City. If the City believes the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement has not been properly performed or that the construction is defective, the City shall inform the State Division Engineer's authorized representative in writing of those defects. Any recommendations made by the City are not binding on the State. The State shall have the exclusive right to determine whether the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement has been satisfactorily performed by the State's contractor. ARTICLE III -BASIS OF PAYMENT BY THE CITY Section A. SCHEDULE "I" A Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. The Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" includes all anticipated City cost participation construction items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this Agreement, and is based on engineer's estimated unit prices. Section B. City Cost Participation Construction With the exception of the traffic signal system and the emergency vehicle preemption system, 100 Percent shall be the City's rate of cost participation in all of the construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Shady Oak Road from Engineer Station 3+155 (Shady Oak Road) to Engineer Station 3+443 within the corporate City limits under State Aid Project No. 181-106-01. The construction includes the City's proportionate share of item costs for mobilization, field office and traffic control and includes, but is 76526 not limited to, those construction items as described and tabulated on Sheets No.2 and No.3 of the attached Preliminary SCHEDULE "I". Section C. Construction Engineering Costs The City shall pay a construction engineering charge in an amount equal to 8 percent of the total cost of the City participation construction covered under this Agreement. Section D. Addenda, Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements The City shall share in the costs of construction contract addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements which are necessary to complete the City cost participation construction covered under this Agreement. Section E. Settlements of Claims The City shall pay to the State its share of the cost of any settlements of contract claims made with the State's contractor. All liquidated damages assessed the State's contractor in connection with the construction contract shall result in a credit shared by the State and the City in the same proportion as their total construction cost share cOvered under this Agreement is to the total contract construction cost before any deduction for liquidated damages. ARTICLE IV -PAYMENT BY THE CITY Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost Share It is estimated that the City's share of the costs of the contract construction plus the 8 percent construction engineering cost share is the sum of $290,707.27 as shown in the attached Preliminary SCHEDULE "I". Upon award of the construction contract the State shall prepare a Revised SCHEDULE "I" based on construction contract unit prices. After the following conditions have been met, the City shall advance to the Commissioner of Transportation the City's total estimated J 1 construction cost share, which does not include the 8 percent construction engineering cost share, as shown in the Revised SCHEDULE "I": 76526 1. Execution and approval of this Agreement and the State's transmittal of same to the City along with a copy of the Revised SCHEDULE "I". 2. Receipt by the.City of a written request from the State for the advancement of funds. Section B. Final Payment by the City Upon completion and acceptance of the contract construction and upon computation of the final amount due the State's contractor, the State shall prepare a Final SCHEDULE "I" and submit a copy to the City. The Final SCHEDULE "I" shall be based on final quantities, and include all City cost participation construction items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this Agreement. If the final cost of the City participation covered under this Agreement exceeds the amount of funds advanced by the City, the City shall, upon receipt of a request from the State, promptly pay the difference to the State without interest. If the final cost of the City participation covered under this Agreement is less than the amount of funds advanced by the City, the State shall promptly return the balance to the City without interest. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.415 (1996), the State waives claim for any amounts less than $2.00 over the amount of City funds previously advanced to the State, and the City waives claim for the return of any amounts less than $2.00 of those funds advanced by the City. Section C. Acceptance of City's Cost and Completed Construction The computation by the State of the amount due from the City shall be final, binding and conclusive, but the State shall provide the City 76526 with the opportunity to review the computations for the City cost participation items described in this document. Prior to final acceptance of the completed construction, the City shall be allowed the opportunity to inspect the completed construction of those facilities to be owned and maintained by the City and to make recommendations to the State as to possible revisionsi however acceptance by the State of the completed contract construction shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of the contract construction. ARTICLE V -GENERAL PROVISIONS Section A. Plan Changes The City may request changes in the plans. If the State determines that the requested plan changes are necessary and/or desirable, the State will cause those plan changes to be made. Section B. Replacement of Castings The City shall furnish the State's contractor with new castings and/or parts for all inplace City-owned facilities constructed hereunder when replacements are required, without cost or expense to ,the State or the State's contractor, except for replacement of castings and/or parts broken or damaged by the State's contractor. Section C. Maintenance by the City Upon satisfactory completion of the Shady Oak Road and Flying Cloud Drive construction to be performed within the corporate City limits under the construction contract, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of the roadways and all of the facilities a part thereof, without cost or expense to the State. Upon satisfactory completion of the storm sewer facilities and City-owned facilities construction to be performed within the corporate City limits under the construction contract, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of those facilities, without cost or expense to the State. 76526 Section D. Additional Drainage Neither party to this Agreement shall drain any additional drainage into the storm sewer facilities to be constructed under the construction contract, that was not included in the drainage for which the storm sewer facilities were designed, without first obtaining permission to do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract are shown in a drainage area map, EXHIBIT "Drainage Area", which is on file in the office of the State's Division Hydraulics Unit at Golden Valley and is made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. Section E. Examination of Books, Records, Etc. As provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.06, subdivision 4 (1996), the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the State and the City relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and the City, and either the legislative auditor or the State auditor as appropriate. Section F. Claims All employees of the State and all other persons employed by the State in the performance of contract construction and/or construction engineering covered under this Agreement shall not be considered employees of the City. All claims that arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so engaged and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on contract construction and/or construction engineering covered under this Agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. All employees of the City and all other persons employed by the City in the performance of maintenance covered under this Agreement shall not be considered employees of the State. All claims that arise I 10 76526 under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees while so engaged and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the employees while so engaged on maintenance covered under this Agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the State. Section G. Agreement Approval Before this Agreement shall .become binding and effective, it shall be approved by a City Council resolution and receive approval of State and City officers as the law may provide in addition to the Commissioner of Transportation or his authorized representative. ARTICLE VI -AUTHORIZED AGENTS The State's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Patricia Schrader, Municipal/Utility Agreements .~ Engineer, or her successor. Her current address and phone number are 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, (612) 296-0969. The City's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Al Gray, City Engineer, or his successor. His current address and phone number are 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-2230, (612) 949-8300. , II 76526 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by their authorized officers. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Recommended for approval: By Mayor By ____________________________ _ Division Engineer Date Approved: By By State Design Engineer City Manager .r Date Date OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Approved as to form and execution: By ____________________________ _ By ______________________________ _ Assistant Attorney General Date PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I" - Agreeme,lt No.; 76526' City of Eden :rrriirie S.P. 2763-35 (T.II. 212=005) Preliminary: June 27, 1997 --------------------------------------------II S.AP.181-106-01 ---------- Stat.: Funds ------ II ---------------------------------------II __ Grading, stom~-='_el\'~!i..~i~~~in_~!.~_pavil1~~I!.ld curb ~~~I gu~~er cOllstruction performed ullde_,_' ______ _ State Conrract No. with ---------------------._----------------- ~ca,e~ on Shady_~~lk RO~!l~~I~~ flyJ!.~!LS'_~oud Dr~e t~.3_~ meters east of Flying Cloud Drive _______________________ II 11------------------------------------------------------II ,----- 1---- -------------------II CITY COST PARTICIPATION ------{ij Frl)m Sl~el N;~3------------" $269,173.40 -------------------------------------- ~ Construction Engineering (8%) $21,533.87 ------------------------.----._--------_._._------------ _________ Total City Cost $290,707.27 --------------------II 11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------II --_.-._-----_._-------- 1------------ ---------------II -------------------------------------------------II ------------------II 1--------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _~!.L~nou'~~~~I~~Ulce 1~~)'~1eI1{ as~~scrJ~c:.~i~:~~E(icle IV, ScctiOil A. of_tl_le_il""gc..re_e_I1_1_e'_lt ________ _ ---------------------II - 1 - ---.------_. ---.-----~. -'---'---~-. (I) 100% CITY (P) = PLAN QUANTITY 76526 ITEI\1 S.A.P.181-106-01 UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST NUl\lBER WORK ITEM (1) ---_. --.~--.--~ ._--_ .. ------._ .. ----.... _---.--'-.. --~ -_.-._-------------_._-----------.-------------------_ .. _---.----------.- ~U21.5ll1 I\\OBILIZATION LUMP SUM 0.60 20,000.00 12,000.00 ---------~-.--._-----....... ~ .. ---.. -_._._-<-_._-. __ .-----<. -_ ... -._-----_ .. _._--------_._------_._---------_._._--_._--------------_.- 2031.501 FIELD OFFICE TYPE D EACH 0.60 5,000.00 3,000.00 -.---._ .. ---------.... __ .------._. ------. ------_._-----------_ ..... __ ._._-_._---~---------.---------------------~------.--------.---.-.- ~IUI.SO~ CLEARING TREE 3.00 300.00 900.00 '.'-'-'---_ .. _-.--_. -------_._ .. __ .. ------'. ------_ .. _---_._------._---._-------------_._--------------_._-----_.-. __ . -------------'--' ----_._--- 21 (J 1.507 GRUBBING TREE 3.00 150.00 450.00 .--_ .. ---_.-_ . . --~-.--.---.-.. --.-.--.----_ ..... _. --_ ... _._-_._--_ .. _---~-.. _._----_ .. _------_._-------_._._-._-._-_.-.-----.-. __ ._----------._--------------- 21l1-1.S01 REMLWE PIPE CULVERTS 111 30.00 30.00 900.00 --_ ... _._-.---,------_. ----" ... _----_. --_._----_._. __ . ---_._. -._-----_. -------_._----------.. --_. __ .. _-------------_.----- 21 0-1.S0 I RL:--.\OVE CURB AND GUTTER III 54-1.00 6.00 3,26.:1.00 ---_. -.. _._-----.--._-.-.---... -._._.-. ------._._._.-----_. --_. ---_._---------- ~ 1U_I.501 REI\\OVE FENCE (P) 111 175.00 6.00 1,050.00 _._---. -"'-._---'-'------------_ ... _-_ ... -_. -_._-.... ----._----.. --.-------.------.-.. ------------~--.------.~---------.--.--.. .. _---_. -----._---.------.-.-~-... -. ~IU_I.S03 RHIOVE BITU1\IINOLJS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (P) III 2 996.00 2.00 1,992.00 -----.. -.----... __ .-.... _--_. __ .. --_._-_ ... _-----_. __ ._-_._-------._. __ ... _----------_._-_._---------_.---"--"'--'---'-'-'----'-.------_._---_._._--------------- 2Ill·l.503 RH\OVE CONCRETE DRIVEWA Y PAVEMENT (P) 1112 204.00 6.00 1,224.00 --.. _--._---."-_. __ . ----_ ..... -----.-----_._------... -_ .. ---._ .. ---.~---.----.------~-----.------. ------._-----* --.---_._-_._._-._-_._-_ .. _-_.---.---- ~ 1 u-l.509 RH\OVE CASTING EACH 5.00 100.00 500.00 ----------'--'--' ._._----_. __ .-.. --------_ .. -._._--_._._._------_.-.---_._. -_._--------_.-.. _--_. .--.--.. ~-._._----------_._------ 21l1..j .509 RH\OVE PIPE :\I'RON EACII 4.00 150.00 600.00 ----_ .. _ ... ----_.------.~-._... -----. _._ .. ---.---_.-.----... _ ... _--------_ .. _--_¥_---_._--------_.---------_. --_.-_._-----_ .. _----._ ... _--._--_ .. -_._---,-------_._--_. ~ 1 U·l.513 SA WING BITUMINOUS PAVElvtENT III 1,194.00 8.00 9,552.00 -._--------_ .. _---_._------_.------_._----_._------_._ .. --~----.. ---------_._----- ~ 10_1 . .523 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE C EACII 9.00 16.00 144.00 --_. ----------------------_._-. __ . ---._----_. ----. __ ... --------_ .... _. ------_._----_. __ ._----------_._-_._---------------------------_. __ ._ .. _. --_._-----_.-------------_._-. --_._-- 21 0-1.523 SALV.-\GE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACII 2.00 200.00 400.00 _. -_ ... ----_. -.-._--_ ... ------------._-.. ----_. -',. __ .---' --.---.-.-' .. -.. --------.. -.--~--.. ----------~------_.--_ .. _-.. _-.-------. ---~ _._._._._--------_ . . __ . ~ I u-U23 SALVAGE IIYDRANT EACII 2.00 400.00 800.00 ------._ .. _---_.--------_._-_. -----'-'-_ .... ---._._._ ... _---.. ---_ .... -_. ---------_._-------_. __ ._._-------------_. ----_ .. _-_._--_.-_.-----.---~------------------_.--------- 2105 . .501 CO",\l\\ON EXCAVATION (P) III 3 4,726.00 3.90 18,431.40 --.-._--_.--------_._---.------.. _. __ ._-.... _-------------.-------_._----------------------_._---------------- -~ 210S.507 SUBGRADE EXCA VATION III 3 600.00 3.90 2,340.00 " ---~-.. -.-~-: ~-.---_._--,_ .. _--_._--_ .. _--------... _ .. ---'"-_. -----_._--------_.-------------------------_ .. _--_._-._-_.--._---------_. --------_. ------ _ltb.)_1 GRANULAR BORROW (CV) III 3 500.00 8.00 4,000.00 ._------------_._---._--------------.. ---------.---.---.--~ ~~ 11.503 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 1113 1,650.00 21.00 34,650.00 ------------------------_._--_.-------------------~---.-. -- ~n 1.503 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING (CV) Cl.ASS I III 3 10.00 25.00 250.00 -------------._--------_._--_._----_ .• ------_._. ----_._----_ ... _-_. ---_._------------------. 2232 . .50 I l\IILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1112 1,040.00 0.50 520.00 ._------------_._---------------_. __ .. .._------- 2~3 1..50 I 13ITUi."lINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE 10.00 50.00 500.00 -----------._-----------_._--- 23_10 . .508 TYPE -17 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 985.00 30.00 29,550.00 --.-.~---._--------_._----------- ~3_10.510 TYPE -17 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 495.00 29.00 14,355.00 -.-.--~--.--.----_._---_.-----_._----_._---_._._----------.----._----------------- 23_10 . .512 TYPE 47 LEVELING COURSE MIXTURE 10.00 50.00 500.00 ---.----------------_._---.... _-_ .. _-------_._--------_. -_.------_. ----------------_. 23_10.51-1 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE t 1,09.5.00 25.00 27,375.00 ---_._----.-------_. __ ._---.--.... .-------_.----._-----_.--_._--------- ~3_10.518 TYPE -17 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR DRIVEWAYS 69.00 60.00 4,140.00 -_._._----------------------_._---------- 0331.603 CRACK REPAIR SPECIAL I III 100.00 8.00 800.00 --------------.- 23.57.50~ I31TUI\IINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT L 5,325.00 0.20 1,065.00 ----.-----_._----------_._ .. _----._------------- ~.501.51.5 375mll1 RC PIPE APRON EACH 2.00 600.00 1,200.00 --_ ... _-_. __ . --_._.--------_._ .. _-_._.----_ ... _ ... _._-----_. -------_._----------------_ .. __ ._--._-------- ~5L13 . .5-11 37511111\ RC PIPE SEWER nESIGN 3006 CLASS III m IOS.00 75.00 8,100.00 _.----_._-_ .. ------_. __ .----_ .. _-------_. --... --._._.--. -_ .. _.------_._._._--_ ...... '-._--' --_._--------.-------_._-----------_.---- 050_1.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACII 2.00 200.00 400.00 --._-------------_ .. ----------. -------.. -. __ ._-... -----_. __ .... ---_.----_. __ ._--_._--_._--------_._--------_ .... _-_. -.---.~-----._-------_.--- 0.50-1.602 ADJUST HYDRANT EACII 1.00 400.00 400.00 ---._.-.---.-----_._-_ .. _--_ .. _.---'-'-"-... _ .. ,-._-. '-'. __ .---_._. .. _ ... -----_.-._----------------_._-_._-_._-_ . . _--_ .. _----_.-".-_._ ... _ ... _._-_ .. _------------_ .. ---- 0)Ll_l.60~ INSTALL GATE VALVE AND BOX EACII 2.00 100.00 200.00 ---_ .. -_. -----_._---_._-.. _------_._--.. _ .. -. _. --_._-_._---_._-_._"-. ._-----_._-------.------------- 050-1.602 INSTALL IIYDRANT EACII 2.00 500.00 1,000.00 i -2 - II ITEM NUJ\1BER S.A.P.181-106-01 WORK ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE 76526 COST (1) t= 050~.6~-=-~ -=-~T2Q~1I1~~.:yrl~~.-0-,~~N-D.~~T IRON CL/2 __ ~n -=~=~= __ ~-9.00 ___ ~~.OO 900.00 II Q?_~~:62~ __ .~VATEIZJ"~~~ F1rnNGS kg ___ J..§.OO 10.00 ____ 160.00 2506.502 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCT DESIGN SPECIAL EACH 8.00 1,500.00 12,000.00 ,-----_ ... _----_._ .. _. __ ._._-------_. __ ._----_. --_._. --.----. _.~.:'~§J~~ ... _Cf~.~TI.~_g .. t\S~Ei\~!~~~. ____ . ____ .. ___ . ____ . EACH __ ... __ 5_.00 ___ . 300.00_ 1,500.00 II 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 2.00 200.00 400.00 1---···_---... --------... -.. -.. --.----.------. --.--------.... ---.-.-.. -.--.--------. ------- 2511.507 GROUTED RIPRAP 1113 2.20 100.00 220.00 --~ -----------------".-------_ .. ----------------------_._---------_.. -_._------_._------------_._------_.-- ~?~ !.::')~_I_.__..S'0!'!~Rr~~~~_~I.~~ .. ~\!'!D_ <:J.~rr!'gR.~!~~g~!~624~ __ .. _________ .2.0}~~Q ______ ~6.00_ 23,426.00 2...:)~ L:~O_~__.~.??!nl11_S'.C2.l'_J.s;.I~!::TgQI.(~~~~V~~~!~_~y E!V~ EN:!:...______ 1112 _____ ._._ . _____ ~12:00 50.00 10,650.00 255-1.509 GUIDE POST, TYPE 13 EACIl 2.00 20.00 40.00 ---------~ -----.. _-----------. -----._---------------_._---------------------- 2557.501 WIRE FENCE DESIGN 60-9322 III 180.00 25.00 4,500.00 -25ti~lj3-7--iN~~ . .\Ll_:_sic;N-TYPE·C-··---···------EACII --00--.9 .00 . 20.00· 180.00 .-05~3~665---·-1;I(AFI~iC-coN;I-..I~·C:)i=_--------·----LUMPSUM-----0.60 10,000.00 6,000.00 II 1----·-_··_----... ----.--.... -.~-..... --.. -. ------.---.-.----------. -----------. 056.1.602~ __ ~c'0/I~i\!.l:}rl' i\~~~f\G~.(q}l[~'Q.~I~C?X~_ .. ~ __ .. _~__________ EACII. ___ . ____ .. J~22. __ . ___ 100.00 1,000.00 056-1.602 PA VEi'-IENT i\IESSAGE (l.EFT ARROW) EPOXY EACH 11.00 100.00 1,100.00 ----.. ---.-.. -.. ----.--.---.-.. ---.-.--.-... -.---.-.-~ .. ---... ---.-----... ----.-.---_. II _~2.~~~ti.~~ _~.~~g--.!~~~~.~:I~.S.?~gE (l~gL~~~~mOW)EPOXY ~ACII_. ___ . __ i.~.Q. _______ I.QO.OO . 400.00 05b-l.60~ PAVHIENT MESSAGE (RIGIIT/TIlRU ARROW) EPOXY EACH 6.00 100.00 600.00 --.-.. --.-.-.-.-.-~---.... -.. ----.-.---.----.-... -----------------.------. II 056-1.603 100111111 SOLID LINE WIllTE-EPOXY m 540.00· 2.00 1,080.00 ~~~~116f~ --f~~~~:~~~EjX~N~~~f~~lr~:~:~~~y--· :~~ .---=--==~3~f~~ .----!:~~. ~~~:~~ -.. --.--.-------. --.-------------.---.-. ---II 056-1.603 60011\111 SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPOXY III 135.00 5.00 675.00 ------------_. .--~---------. 056-1.603 100111111 DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPOXY m 940.00 2.00 1,880.00 'I ~?JI~_~!.....!2~lTc-l·i~~~~ --===~~=-_. ___ . ___ . ___ .~----EACI I. 10.00 6.00 60.00 II 2573.502 SILT FENCE ilEA VY DUTY 111 360.00 9.00 3,240.00 ::;-:--;:-::----.. ----~~---.. -.:;-----.-.----.-.-.... ------... ---..... ----.---------------. -. II _)7:\.)01 SI:l:DIN(J ha 0.10 )00.00 50.00 1--·_····_· ----.----.-... ---..... --.... -.--.--.-.-.-----.. -.. -.. .-----.-----------._- _~~.7~~~~_~. __ ?~~g~~!:~.I~~.~~::..ig~~ __ . __ ~ ______ .. _. __ .. __ .___ ~~ ____ . __ ~2Q.. 10.00 80.00 ~575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN 1112 3,800.00 3.00 11,400.00 ~----~-----------------.---_ .. _._---------------- 2575.511 MULCII i\IATERIAL TYPE I t 0.50 200.00 100.00 -.---.---.-.. ~--.---.-.. -... ---.-.... ---.. ----... -.-.---~-... -------------.-. -----------.----II 2575.519 DISK ANCIIORING ha 0.10 100.00 10.00 11--·----.-----.-------~------------------. . _.257~:~~~ __ C2~_Il\_1~R!=_I_A_L_F~~_~~~AI~X.SIS_IO_-2_0~~~. ____ .______ kg ____ .~. ____ .. __ 2_3_0.:0_0 ______ 2_.00_. 460.00 II ---·----·I--·~··--·-··--------·-----·-·· 1 ____ . __ =~~J-.-.==-==-=I--TOT~~ .. ___ : $269,173.40 II _______________ • ____ . __ ._ ...... ___ . ________ . _______ . ___ . -______ ._._._ .... ____ • ___ ._ ...... _ .. _ --_ .. _-----_._----------. __ ._--_____ .1 __ -_--._.- (I) 100% CITY ... _ .• _______ ......:c..:..-_______ .-~ ____ . $269-:1·73"40··1==.=.~=:1.-_. -·----11 1----···--··--1-. ----.-.... -.. --.-I· -I'" II -3 - DATE: 08/05/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: -rtf. J, SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Hopf Addition Randy Slick Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the fmal plat of Hopf Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $250 • Completion of Vacation of·underlying drainage and utility easements Background: This plat consis~of a combination of Lots 12 and 13, Block 5 of Bearpath Second Addition. This proposal falls under the guideline for a "simple subdivision" defmed within the City Code. JJ:ssa cc: Keith Waters and Associates, Inc. lloyd Pew, H.T.P.O. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF HOPF ADDmON WHEREAS, the plat of Hopf Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Hopf Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated July 28, 1997. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATIEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk ~~------~--------~~------------------~·I ci z cj o Q 0:: cj z o -I--C C < LL a. o :I: I III Z J I ~ I!! I ~ I I ~ B 1 ; ~ iii II I .. Jl I I j t !s ! , ; • I!! 0 ~ 0 I g!l~ ~.. ~ o,~ SEI'" 00 is ! liD! . , osl ..1 __ --~ ~h --r--l ~i~ Ii f iOlg~ ! :;~~f 0'-~o , I iin EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-5-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR rV.t<· ITEM NO. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger NATIONAL TIRE AND BATTERY Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.15 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the C-Reg-Ser District on 1.15 acres; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.15 acres; 3. Approval ofa Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement I NATIONAL TIRE AND BATTERY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 36-97-PUD-2S-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District 36-97-PUD-25-97 (hereinafter "PUD-25-97-C-Reg-Ser"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions ofthat certain Developer's Agreement dated as of August 5, 1997, entered into between Sears, Roebuck and Co., and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions ofPUD-25-97 -C-Reg-Ser, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-25-97-C-Reg-Ser is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-25-97-C-Reg-Ser is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-25-97 -C-Reg-Ser are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-25-97-C-Reg-Ser is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is amended within the RI-9.5 District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 25-97-C-Reg-Ser, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 1st day of July, 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of August, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _______________ _ NATIONAL TIRE AND BATTERY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 36-97-PUD-2S-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows the amending of land located at Eden Road and Hwy. 212, within the C-Reg-Ser District on 1.15 acres; subject to the tenns and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effectiye Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. IslJean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _______ ' (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) EXHIBIT A National Tire & Battery Legal Description: PUD Concept Amendment Lot 1, Block 2, Eden Glen~ Lot I, Block 1, Eden Glen 2nd Addition~ Lot 1 and 2, Block I, Eden Glen 4th Addition~ Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Brody Addition~ Lot 1, Block 1, Montgomery Addition; all located in Hennepin County MN PUD District Review, Zoning District Amendment, Site Plan Review Lot 1, Block 2, Eden Glen~ Hennepin County, MN NATIONAL TIRE AND BATTERY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR NATIONAL TIRE AND BATTERY BY SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. WHEREAS, Sears, Roebuck and Co. has applied for Site Plan approval of National Tire and Battery on 1.15 acres for construction of a 10,000 square foot building located at Eden Road and Hwy. 212, to be zoned within the C-Reg-Ser District on 1.15 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on July 1, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 9, 1997, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 1, 1997, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to National Tire and Battery, for the construction of a 10,000 square foot building, based on plans dated June 24, 1997, between Sears, Roebuck and Co., and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT NATIONAL TIRE & BATTERY THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of August 5, 1997, by Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 15 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.15 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the C-Reg-Ser District on 1.15 acres, and Site Plan Review on 1.15 acres, for construction of a 10,000 square foot building legally described on Exhibit A (the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe City adopting Resolution No. 97-126 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. 'PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated June 24, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 1, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved utility plans concurrent with building construction and prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final 7 grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 5. NURP POND: Developer acknowledges City's requirement that a NURP facility for the treatment of storm water be created and maintained on the Property. Developer has represented to City that construction of such a pond on the Property is not feasible. As a result, Developer has volunteered to make a payment to City in an amount equal to 2% of the land value, or purchase price of the Property plus $1,000 per acre of impervious surface, based on the approved plan, which Developer and City agree is an amount sufficient to substantially offset the additional impact on the City'S storm water facilities caused by the absence of a NURP pond on the Property. Developer waives any and all rights to object to the nature or amount of this voluntary payment and agrees to defend and indemnifY City for any claims made by any party that the nature or amount of the payment is invalid for any reason. Developer acknowledges that this payment is in lieu of a NURP facility only and that Developer and the Property may still be assessed or charged other amounts for construction and maintenance of storm water facilities, including but not limited to amounts for the storm water utility fund and special assessments relating to the Property. 6. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the ~~~~~~~~~~oo~~~~~~~~~ of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 7. IRRlGA nON PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 8. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer has submitted to City Planner, and has received City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in hislher sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 11. TRASH ENCLOSURE: Developer has submitted to the City Planner, and obtained the City Planner's written approval of a plan for the design and construction of the outside trash enclosure for the Property, as depicted in Exlubit B. This trash enclosure shall be constructed with face brick to match the building, include a roof, and heavy duty steel gates that completely screen the interior of the enclosure. Developer shall complete implementation of the trash enclosure plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 12. OUTSIDE STORAGE: Developer shall not permit on the Property any outside storage of inoperable automobiles, automobile parts, batteries, tires, equipment, inventory or refuse. q 13. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, hold hannless, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorney's fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, hold hannless, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. 10 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-5-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. jjl,L. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger EDENVALE FAMILY HOUSING Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 6.3 acres and Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to RM-6.5 on 3.5 acres and to RM-2.5 on 2.8 acres; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 6.3 acres; 3. Approval of Developer's Agreements for Peter Andrea Company and The Damone Group Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreements I EDENVALE FAMILY HOUSING ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 35-97-PUD-24-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Community Commercial District and be placed in the RM-6.5 District and RM-2.5 Zoning District 35-97 -PUD-24-97 (hereinafter "PUD-24-97-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions ofthat certain Developer's Agreements dated as of August 5, 1997, entered into between Peter Andrea Company and The Damone Group, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreements"). The Developer's Agreements contain the terms and conditions of PUD-24-97-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-24-97-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-24-97-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-24-97-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-24-97-RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Community Commercial District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-24-97-RM- 6.5 and RM-2.5 and the legal descriptions ofland in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision I, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 23rd day of June, 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of August, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ________________ ' EDENVALE FAMILY HOUSING AL TERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 35-97-PUD-24-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CO NT AIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summruy: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Mitchell Road and Valley View Road from Community Commercial to RM-6.5 on 3.5 acres and to RM-2.5 on 2.8 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effectiye Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. IslJean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ______ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) Guide Plan Zoning Site Plan Review DEANOVIK PARCEL That part of Lot 1, Block 2, EDENV ALE 4TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 450.13 feet southeasterly of the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, as measured along said northeasterly line; thence southwesterly to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 440.76 feet southeasterly of the most westerly corner of said Lot 1, as measured along said southwesterly line, and there terminating. and lying northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 52 degrees 05 minutes 11 seconds west along the northwesterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 349.43 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South 34 degrees 21 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 40.71 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 139.40 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 424.71 feet and a central angle of 18 degrees 48 minutes 19 seconds; thence southeasterly a distance of 119.57 feet along a reverse curve, concave to the southwest having a radius of 216.73 feet and a central angle of 31 degrees 36 minutes 40 seconds; thence South 21 degrees 33 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of 2.68 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 106.44 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 15l.24 feet and a central angle of 40 degrees 19 minutes 23 seconds; thence South 39 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 46.68 feet and said line there terminating. Legal Description -PU.o -"P1~t Lot one, Block one, Edenvale 4th Addition EDENV ALE FAMILY HOUSING ALTERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR EDENV ALE FAMILY HOUSING BY PETER ANDREA COMPANY AND THE DAMONE GROUP WHEREAS, Peter Andrea Company and The Damone Group has applied for Site Plan approval of Edenvale Family Housing on 6.3 acres for construction of 32 rental multi-family housing units and a 52 unit assisted living building located at Mitchell Road and Valley View Road, to be zoned RM-6.5 on 3.3 acres and zoned RM-2.5 on 2.8 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on July 1, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 23, 1997, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July I, 1997, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Edenvale Family Housing, for the construction of 32 rental multi-family housing units and a 52 unit assisted living building, based on plans dated July 1, 1997, between Peter Andrea Company, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT EDENVALE FAMILY HOUSING THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 5, 1997, by the Peter Andrea Company a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Medium Density Residential on 3.5 acres and from Office to High Density Residential Density Residential on 2.8 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 6.3 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 6.3 acres, Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to RM-6.5 on 3.5 acres and RM-2.5 on 2.8 acres, Site Plan Review on 6.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of 6.3 acres into 2 lots situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No.35-97-PUD-24- 97 for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change, Resolution No. 97- 125 for Preliminary Plat, Resolution No. Site Plan Review, Resolution No. 97-123 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and Resolution No. 97-124, PUD Concept Review. Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials submitted by Developer and revised and dated July 1, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 1, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREETS AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Developer shall complete the implementation ofthe approved plan prior to building permit issuance. 1 4. FINAL GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, stonn water detention areas and stonn sewers. All design calculations for stonn water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond confonns to the final grading plan prior to acceptance to public utilities. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Pennit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall confonn to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 5. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 6. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building pennit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the tenns and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. RET AINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of a building pennit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in ExhibitB. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 9. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner, in hislher sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a permit by Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.70, Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location, manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material construction, and location of any such sign. consistent with the sign plan shown on Exhibit B and in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Section 11.70, Subdivision Sa. q 11. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 220 caliper inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 220 caliper inches. Tree replacement required is 146 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 146 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3 inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7 foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to building permit issuance. 12. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 13. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the RM-6.5 District and RM-2.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD -24-97. A. Waiver from the front yard setback to parking in the RM 6.5 district from 30 to 20 feet. B. Waiver from the maximum density in the RM-6.5 district from 6.7 units per acre to 9.36 units per acre. 14. CROSS ACCESS, USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall enter into a cross access, use , and maintenance agreement,between Peter Andrea Company, a Minnesota Corporation and The Damone Group, LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, the form of which must be approved in writing by the City Engineer. This Agreement shall address joint vehicle access, and maintenance of parking, driveways ponds and storm sewers. All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer or Owner. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that the cross access and maintenance agreement has been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Titles' Office. 10 15. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, hold hannless, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorney's fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, hold hannless, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. II OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETER ANDREA COMPANY AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 5,1997 by and between C. H. Robinson Company, a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. 35-97, changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Community Commercial District to the RM-6.5 and RM-2.5 Districts, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review and Resolution No. 97-123, for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change and Resolution No.97-125 for Preliminary Plat as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of August 5, 1997, by and between Peter Andrea Company, Minnesota Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If THE PETER ANDREA COMPANY, fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat as identified above, thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. I~ DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT AL TERNATIVE LIVING SERVICES TIllS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 5. 1997, by The Damone Group, LLC, a Michigan Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Developer. to and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE. a municipal corporation. hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Medium Density Residential on 3.5 acres and from Office to High Density Residential Density Residential on 2.8 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 6.3 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 6.3 acres. Zoning District Change from Community Commercial to RM-<>.5 on 3.5 acres and RM~2.5 on 2.8 acres. Site Plan Review on 6.3 acres and Preliminary Plat of6.3 acres into 2 lots situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota. more fully described in E<s:hibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property~" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development Di::ltrict Review and Zoning District Change, Resolution No. for PreliminaJ)' Plat, Resolution No. Site Plan Review, Resolution No. O:mlprehensive Guide Plan Change and Resolution No. PUD Concept Review. Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development. and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials submitted by Developer and revised and dated July I, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 1. 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the perfonnance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the tenns. covenants. agreements. and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREETS AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any pennit for the construction of for the Property. Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and stonn sewer. Developer shall complete the implementation of the approved plan prior to building permit issuance. 13 4. FINAL GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan. for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, stann water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond confonns to the final grading plan prior to acceptance to public utilities. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 5. IRRIGA nON PLAN: Prior to building pennit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for iIrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the tenns and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property. 6. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building pennit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to he used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7. RET AlNING WALLS: Prior to issuance by City of a building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official. and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls indicated on the grading plan in ExhibitS. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. attached hereto. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building pennit issuance. Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance VIlith the tenns and conditions of Exhibit C. 9. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph. "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters. electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening. it is detennined by the City Planner, in his/her sole discretio~ that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a penni! by Eden Prairie City Code, Section 11.70, Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location, manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material constructio~ and location of any such sign. consistent with the sign plan shown on Exhibit B and in accordance with the requirements of City Code. Section 11.70, Subdivision Sa. It] 11. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 220 caliper inches of significant trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 220 caliper inches. Tree replacement required is 146 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit for the Property. Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 146 caliper inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3 inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7 foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herem, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to building pe:rmit issuance. 12. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 20 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved. lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property. 13. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the RM-6.5 District and RM-2.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD,~ __ A. Waiver from the front yard setback to parking in the RM 6.5 district from 30 to 20 feet. B. Waiver from the maximum density in the RM-2.5 district from 17.4 units per acre to 18.63 units per acre. 14. CROSS ACCESS, USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to building pennit issuance. Developer shall enter into a cross access, use , and maintenance agreement.between Peter Andrea Company, a Minnesota Corporation and The Damone Group. LLe, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, the form of which must be approved in writing by the City Engineer. This Agreement shall address joint vehicle access, and maintenance of parking. driveways ponds and stonn sewers. All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the beveloper or Owner. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that the cross access and maintenance agreement has been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's OfficelRegistrar of Titles' Office. 15. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees It, 15. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, hold hannless, defend and indemnity City. its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims. demands, lawsuits. complaints, loss, costs (including attorney's fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants. contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, hold harmless, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. 17 OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DAAIONE GROUP, LLC, A MICHIGAN CORPORATION AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE TIllS AGREEMENT~ made and entered into as of August 5. 1997 by and between C. H.Robinson Company~ a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. _-_, changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the District to the ____ _ District, and Resolution No. __ for Site Plan Review and Resolution No. , and Resolution No. for Preliminary Plat as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of_ ' by and between ., a Minnesota Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If THE DAMONE GROUP, LLC, A MlCIDGAN CORPORATION., fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Planned Unit Development,Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat as identified above I thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. IZ Memorandum To: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources From: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: June 30, 1997 Subject: Tree Loss at Edenvale Family Housing Tree Loss: The tree loss for the proposed project of Edenvale Family Housing is 100%. The project is divided into two lots, one for multi family housing and the other for an assistant care living center. On Lot 1, which is the site of the assistant living building, the tree loss is 100%. The breakdown of tree loss on this site is: • Eight cottonwood trees, three basswood trees and one hackberry, for a total of 12 trees and 170 inches of significant trees removed. The tree species found on this site include elm, basswood, cottonwood, box elder, and hackberry. There is a large amount of underbrush and small trees in three tree mass areas of this lot. On Lot 2, the tree loss is also 100%. The breakdown of trees removed is: • Four cottonwood trees, three trees which are 12" in diameter and one tree which is 14" in diameter. The total diameter inch for the removal of the four trees is 50 diameter inches. Additional trees on this site include box elder, basswood, cottonwoods, and elms. Replacement: Since the tree loss is 100%, the developer is required to mitigate at a rate greater than the original loss. • On Lot 1, the mitigation is 226 inches of trees. • On Lot 2, the mitigation is 67 diameter inches. Besides mitigating the tree loss, the developer is also required to put in trees, by ordinance, for landscaping and screening of parking lots and adjacent areas. The total amount of landscaping required is 218 diameter inches. The developer is proposing to put in a total of 529 inches of replacement, which is 18 caliper inches greater than that required by ordinance for landscaping and tree replacement. In past developments where the tree loss is 100% it has been suggested by staff that developers plant additional trees above the required amount by City Code. This is suggested to give the site a "wooded" character and lessen the visual impact of losing all the significant trees on the site. SAF:mdd EdenFam.memo Approved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 7, 1997 v. the court. Hilgeman suggested putting the basketball court behind the baseball diamond in front of the pond. Lambert said that's a foul ball range area and would not put any kind of recreational facility there. Jacobson suggesting putting the basketball court in the parking lot like Eden Lake School. Lambert said it's a possibility but it makes him nervous because there is drive through traffic and you would have to assume that everyone is paying attention. He noted between the softball field and the soccer field there is a knoll between the two drainage areas and suggested maybe a half court there. He said less than five percent of the games are full court so this may work. Koenig empathized with the McNees about the situation because they can not wipe out the sound. She asked what the cost would be for a half court. Lambert replied it would be approximately $15,000 for half court no matter where the location is. MOTION: Wilson moved, seconded by Koenig, to postpone action until the August 18 meeting so the Commission can have an opportunity to go out and visit the site and the neighbors can be notified of a public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. Lambert noted before the meeting staff will do a little survey work to see if they can move the basketball court north of the parking lot. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Edenvale Family HousinK Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 3, 1997, from Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a staff report dated June 20, 1997, from Michael Franzen, City Planner. Jim Deanovic, developer, reviewed the development proposal with the Commission and noted this is a very unusual and difficult site. He showed where they were going to do two cul-de-sacs but decided not to maintain the significant amount of natural trees in the comer and also along Mitchell Road. There are rows of trees they would like to maintain. They would like to keep as many of the trees as possible. F ox reviewed the staff report with the Commission. The tree loss is 100 3 ao Approved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 7, 1997 percent and mitigation for that is actually greater than the loss based on the formula for the tree ordinance adding 70 percent loss for 100 percent replacement. One site had 170 diameter inches removed and that was 12 trees which included eight cottonwoods, three basswoods and one hackberry. The second site had 50 diameter inches removed which were four cottonwood trees. The mitigation for Lot 1 is 226 inches of trees and Lot 2 is 67 diameter inches. They are also required to put in screening based on the number of units as well as to adequately screen the parking lot. As a result, the developer is putting is 529 diameter caliper inches of landscaping which is 18 caliper inches greater than required. There is a significant amount of trees that do not show up on the tree plan in terms of significance. There are a lot of smaller trees along Mitchell Road and one of the things mentioned at the City Council meeting was to try to maintain that buffer strip along Mitchell Road as a visual buffer and try to utilize some of the materials that are there. The NURP pond is located in the southwestern comer of the project to handle all of the storm water drainage from the site. The sizing of the pond is determined by the Engineering review of that particular pond as well as by the Watershed District. There is an internal trail system to handle pedestrian traffic. Staff recommended the developer to upgrade that trail system from 4' wide to an 8' wide bituminous trail to handle two way traffic. In addition, outlets from that system should be extended to Valley View Road so that pedestrian and bicycle traffic is able to enter onto the Valley View Road trail without having to travel along the interior drive. Staff also recommended that the sidewalk/trail in front of the assisted care facility be extended out to Mitchell Road to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic. This project was reviewed at the June 23 Planning Commission meeting and went to the City Council on July 1. The reason for that is because the first Tuesday of the month was a City Council meeting rather than a Parks Commission meeting. Koenig was concerned about the landscape plan including dogwoods because of deer damage. This is right next to the conservation area and there are deer down there. Fox said this is the shrub form of dogwoods. Koenig asked if the developer would consider putting in cottonwoods since 4 Approved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 7, 1997 VI. that's what's being removed. Deanovic said when he did the Crown Oaks project the City requested them to use the pin oaks, most of which died, and all he wants is something that's going to live and look good. Koenig asked about cottonwoods near the NURP pond. Fox explained cottonwoods belong in open spaces where they will not impact homes or structures and this would not be a good idea. They are messy and have shallow root systems. Koenig commented she understands why there is 100 percent tree loss for both of these buildings. It's going to have a big impact for residents, not just the loss of significant trees but the tree mass as well. She asked the developer if he would be willing to put in that retaining wall to try to save something on Mitchell Road. Deanovic replied they would like to make those grades work. You're looking at the cost of land and trying to make affordable housing work. He would not commit to another $10,000 for a retaining wall. He would commit to absolutely trying to make those grades work and trying not to put more fill in. Fox was comfortable with no retaining wall because box elders are very tolerant of certain activity with an exclusionary fence. Brown was concerned about the cost of these homes. Deanovic said they are trying to provide a real nice healthy environment for people of 50 percent median income in Eden Prairie. He noted there is a great need for this type of housing in Eden Prairie. MOTION: Wilson moved, seconded by Kracum, to approve staffs recommendation for the Edenvale Family Housing project as submitted. Motion carried 7-0. (Hilgeman was excused at 8:00 p.m.) OLD BUSINESS A. None VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Update on the Bi" Woods Meetin" This item was continued until the next meeting because Hilgeman had to leave. B. Update on the LRT Trail 5 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-5-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. t:v. tfJ. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger BEST BUY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS Scott Kipp EXPANSION 1997 Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 28.46 acres and Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 Park on 1 acre; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 28.46 acres; 3. Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement I BEST BUY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS EXPANSION 1997 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 34-97-PUD-23-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CO NT AIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject ofthis Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the 1-2 Park Zoning District 34-97-PUD-23-97 (hereinafter "PUD-23-97-1-2 Park"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions ofthat certain Developer's Agreement dated as of August 5, 1997, entered into between Best Buy Co., Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-23-97-1-2 Park, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-23-97-1-2 Park is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-23-97-1-2 Park designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-23-97-1-2 Park are justified by the design ofthe development described therein. D. PUD-23-97-1-2 Park is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-23-97-1-2 Park and the legal descriptions ofland in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. 2 Section 6. City Code Chapter I entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting ofthe City Council ofthe City of Eden Prairie on the 1st day of July, 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of August, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _________________ ' BEST BUY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS EXPANSION 1997 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 34-97-PUD-23-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summruy: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Flying Cloud Drive from Rural to 1-2 Park on 1 acre. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance. gives the full legal description ofthis property. Effectiye Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. IslJean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ______ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) EXHIBIT A Best Buy Parking Expansion 1997 Legal Description: PUD Concept Amendment, PUD District Review, Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot A, All in LEE DATA, according to the recorded plat thereof. / That part of West 70th Street as dedicated on the recorded plat of LEE DATA and now to be vacated which lies easterly of the easterly right of way line of U.S. Highway No. 212 and lying westerly of a line drawn southerly at a right angle to the northerly line of said plat from a point on said northerly line distant 160.00 feet westerly from the northeast corner of said plat. Rezoning from Rural to 1-2 That part of Outlot A, LEE DATA, according to the recorded plat thereof which lies northerly of that particular northerly line of said OUtlot A having a record bearing of North 88 degrees 39 minutes 38 seconds East and its westerly extension. '5 BEST BUY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS EXPANSION 1997 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR BEST BUY CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS EXPANSION 1997 BY BEST BUY CO., INC. WHEREAS, Best Buy Co., Inc. has applied for Site Plan approval of Best Buy Corporate Headquarters Expansion 1997 on 28.46 acres for construction of additional parking located at 7075 Flying Cloud Drive, by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on July 1, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 9, 1997, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its July 1, 1997, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Best Buy Corporate Headquarters Expansion 1997, for the construction of additional parking, based on plans dated June 6, 1997, between Best Buy Co., Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on August 5, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BEST BUY PARKING EXPANSION 1997 THIS SUPPLEMENT TO AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 5,1997 by BEST BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN .PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 28.46 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 28.46 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 1 acre, Site Plan Review on 28.46 acres, and Preliminary Plat of28.46 acres into 1 lot, all situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and; WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Developer's Agreement between Best Buy Company, Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie for Best Buy Corporate Headquarters Expansion, dated December 6, I 994(hereinafter the "Developer's Agreement) for that portion of the Property legally descnbed in Exlubit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and depicted as the "Amended Area" in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 97-127 for Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Change, Resolution No. ._ for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 97-128 for Preliminary Plat, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of the Amended Area as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Amended Area of the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated October 12, 1994, reviewed and approved by the City Council on November 15, 1994, and in conformance with the materials revised and dated April 9, 1996, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 16, 1996, and in conformance with the materials revised and dated June 6, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on July 1, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exlubit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All 1 design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. The final grading and drainage plan shall convey all storm water from new pavement surfaces to storm water treatment ponds of sufficient capacity. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan concurrent with parking lot construction for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to grading permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to release of the landscape bond for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 5. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan concurrent with parking lot construction in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exlnbit C, attached hereto. 6. REAFFIRMING CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT: Developer reaffirms all of the terms, conditions and obligations of "Developer" under the Developer's Agreement dated December 6, 1994, the Supplement to Developer's Agreement dated May 7, 1996, except as inconsistent with or amended by this Supplement, wherein such instance, this Supplement shall control. q EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-5-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1VN. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger VILLAS AT MITCHELL LAKE Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Approve 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 9.64 acres and Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-9.5 on 9.64 acre; 2. Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change 2. Developer's Agreement I ----------------,-------------------------------- VILLAS AT MITCHELL LAKE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 32-97-PUD-22-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section I. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the RI-22 District and be placed in the RI-9.5 Zoning District 32-97-PUD-22-97 (hereinafter "PUD-22-97-RI-9.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of August 5, 1997, entered into between Jasper Development Corporation of Waconia, Minnesota, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-22-97-RI-9.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-22-97-RI-9.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-22-97-RI-9.5 designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-22-97 -R 1-9.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-22-97-RI-9.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the RI-22 and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-22-97-RI-9.5 and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. 2 Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of June, 1997, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 5th day of August, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _______________ _ CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 32-97-PUD-22-97 VILLAS AT MITCHELL LAKE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summa.ry: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Terrey Pine Drive and Highway 5 from Rl-22 to Rl-9.5 on 9.64 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: ATTEST: lsi John D. Frane City Clerk This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. IslJean L. Harris Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ______ _ (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, and that part of Government Lot 1, Section 17, all in Township 116 North, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as beginning at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 1, Section 17, distant 1712.00 feet west of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 1, Section 17; thence north at right angles to said north line a distance of 177.75 feet to the southerly right of way line of State Trunk Highway No.5 as described in Final Certificate Document No. 5842275; thence west along said southerly right of way line to the west line of said Government Lot 1, Section 8; thence south along said west line to the shore of Mitchell Lake, said line passing through a judicial landmark set 62.34 feet south of the meander corner on the west line of said Lot 1; thence southeasterly along said shore to its intersection with a line drawn south at rights angles to the north line of said Government Lot 1, Section 17, from the point of beginning; said line passing through a judicial landmark set 409.42 feet south of the point of beginning; thence north to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. WJC 273195.01 DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT VILLAS AT MITCHELL LAKE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 5, 1997 by Jasper Development Corporation of Waconia, Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RI-9.5 and Preliminary Plat of 9.64 acres into 24 lots and one outlot, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, for the construction of 24 single family homes, on 9.64 acres, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Planned Unit Development and Zoning and Resolution No. for Preliminary Plat. Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials submitted by Developer and revised and dated June 17, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 17, 1997, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Developer agrees to enter into a connection charge agreement for the property with respect to the above referenced improvements in form and substance attached as Exhibit G to this Agreement. Developer shall complete the implementation of the approved utility plans prior to occupancy permit issuance. 4. FINAL GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for stonn water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall confonn to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property. 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building pennit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant m ... erials as shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner'S approval of a landscape performance bond, or other quarantee acceptable to the City, equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, and in accordance with the tenns and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Developer has submitted to the City Planner, and has received the City Planner's written approval of a plan for exterior building materials and colors for the Property as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. If these materials and colors are changed, the Developer shall, prior to building permit issuance, submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's approval of a plan depicting the exterior materials and colors to be used for the Property. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 7 7. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 2,646 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 461 caliper inches. Tree replacement required is 110 caliper inches. Prior to the release of the final plat, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 110 diameter inches. This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3 inch diameter minimum size for a shade tree and a 7 foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss. Upon written approval by the City Forester, Developer agrees to implement the approved tree replacement plan prior to prior to occupancy permit issuance. 8. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: To the extent depicted in Exhibit B, City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the Rl-9.5 District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property, and incorporates said waivers as part ofPUD ____ _ A. Lot size less than 9,500 square feet. B. Lot width less than 70 feet 9. CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY: Prior to the release of the first building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit evidence to the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, that the approved Conservation Easement, attached as Exhibits E and F, for the area delineated on Exhibit B, attached hereto, has been filed in the Hennepin County Recorder'slRegistrar of Titles' Office. OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN JASPER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WACONIA AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of August 5,1997, by and between D.H.M. Eames Trust and Emma A. Eames Trust, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. _-_, changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the RI-22 District to the RI-9.5 District, and Resolution No. , for Preliminary Plat, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of August 5,1997 by and between, JASPER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WACONIA, a Minnesota Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If, JASPER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WACONIA fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat, as identified above, thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. q EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-5-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS iA· ITEM NO. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger WYNSTONE Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.76 acres; 3. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 9.01 acres; 4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 9.01 acres into 31 lots; 5. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 9.01 acres and Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RM-6.5 on 4.76 acres and RI-13.5 on 4.25 acres; 6. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: Wynstone is a mixed use residential project on the west side of Baker Road north of St. Andrew Drive. The plan is 31 units, 22 twinhomes and 9 single family homes. The density of the single family homes is 2.12 units per acre. The density ofthe twinhomes is 4.62 units per acre. The overall density is 3.44 units per acre. Issues: 1. Are there compelling reasons for changing the guide plan from low density residential to medium density residential? 2. What density is appropriate for this site? 3. Is the amount of tree loss acceptable? 4. Should Forest Hills Road be connected to Candice Lane? J Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning voted 3-1-2 to recommend denial of the project because no compelling reason was demonstrated to change the guide plan. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation: The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 3-2 to recommend denial of the proposal due to the high tree loss. Supporting Reports: Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change Resolution for PUD Concept Review Resolution for Preliminary Plat Staff Report dated July 11, 1997 Correspondence Council Minutes dated August 1, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes dated July 14, 1997 1 WYNSTONE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal ofWynstone by Jasper Development for construction of22 unit townhomes and 9 single family lots requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: 4.76 acres from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential at Baker Road and Roberts Drive. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of August, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. WYNSTONE A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF WYNSTONE FOR JASPER DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Wynstone PUD Concept by Jasper Development and considered their request for approval for development and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the request on August 5, 1997; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Wynstone, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated July 29, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated July 14, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 5th day of August, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A Wynstone Legal Description LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 225, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the record plot thereof that lies westerly of Baker Road, and that part of Lo t 35, of said AUDI TOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 225 tho t lies west of Baker Road and east of the plat of FOREST KNOLLS SECOND ADDITION, according to the record pia t thereo f. 5 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OFWYNSTONE FOR JASPER DEVELOPMENT BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: WYNSTONE That the preliminary plat ofWynstone for Jasper Development dated July 28, 1997, consisting of 9.01 acres into 31 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 5th day of August, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk ST AFF REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: Planning Commission Michael D. Franzen. City Planner July 11, 1997 Wynstone Jasper Homes of Waconia Wilbur Gjersvik, Steven T. and Karen 1. Lipe, William B. Bunn, Donald Flom East of Baker Road and north of St. Andrew Drive 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.76 acres. 2. PUD Concept Review on 9.01 acres. 3. PUD DistriCl Review on 9.01 acres. 4. Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to RlY1-6.5 on 4.76 acres and R 1-13.5 on 4.25 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 9.01 acres into 31 lots. 1 j ~ I ~ ;,'; -~ 'tlO 31\/1/))3)(3 "I, C. P: fI1 r. ~~ CJ f. :r. fl1 ;-., :u -~ ,'. ;: I~C < :.t' ,·1 :r-.... I' ---:;t.-L- >lliVci ).'.,' r.',: ~---- .. , -,' ., . ".;:'" " ... ;:\: <r, .. '.>: .. "\) T :l; :~.' Pi Pi ',,' .... :'!; -. j"; if· ;:i"'~ ~ ----:::.~~!:-.?.?) ~]"~~" \: ~ -------~"~.-. "-~ -~~ :x: o r r -< :I:l o le- O ~~~ / Staff Report Wynstone July 11, 1997 BACKGROUND The site is currently guided low density residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. Surrounding land is guided low density to the north, south and west. Land east of Baker Road is low density and medium density. The site is currently zoned Rl-22. Surrounding land is zoned Rl-22 to the west, Rl-13.5 to the north and south, and Rl-13.5 and RM 6.5 east of Baker Road. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE The Planning Commission must decide if there are compelling reasons for changing the comprehensive plan on a portion of the property to allow 22 twinhomes at a density of 4.62 units per acre. The proponent believes the guide plan should be changed for the following reasons: 1. The mixed use is consistent with land uses in this part of Eden Prairie. 2. The proposed townhouses are situated to have minimal impact on existing single family homes. 3. The proposed townhomes respond to the City's goal of providing a variety of housing. Reasons for not changing the guide plan are as follows: 1. Although, in general, there is mixed use and multiple family in the area, Arbor Glen Townhouses is the only multiple family development adjacent to the site across Baker Road. 2. Arbor Glen is a mixed use project. The overall density is 1.96 units per acre. Even though the guide plan graphically shows the townhouses as multiple, since the density is less than 2.5 units per acre, the City did not require or approve a guide plan change. 3. The density of the proposed townhouses at 4.62 units per acre is higher than Arbor Glen Townhouses at 3.77 units per acre. 4. Although the mixed use provides a variety of housing, which is consistent with City housing goals, and responds to market conditions, the density is higher than the adjoining neighborhoods. q Staff Report Wynstone July 11, 1997 SITE PLAN RESIDENTIAL The site plan shows the subdivision of 9.01 acres into 31 lots at a gross density of 3.44 units per acre. The density ofthe single family area is 2.12 units per acre. The density ofthe twinhomes is 4.62 units per acre. All of the single family lots meet the lot size requirements of the Rl-13.5 zoning district. None of the twinhome lots meet the 3,000 square foot lot size requirements of the RM-6.5 district. The proposed lots are 2,965 square feet. This is a Planned Unit Development waiver. The lot lines could be adjusted to add 35 square feet to meet the minimum lot size requirement and no waiver would be necessary. TRANSITION When higher density projects are located next to lower density neighborhoods, the City requires a transition. Transition can be created by small increases in density at the edge of abutting neighborhoods, berming and plantings, and increased setbacks. The plan with single family homes on the north and west is the correct land use next to existing single family neighborhoods. The increase in density is .24 units per acre from the north and .58 units per acre from the west. The proposed twin homes are adjacent to existing single family homes to the southwest and future single family to the south. The increase in density is 2.04 units per acre. The twin homes sit on a hill, with retaining walls in the back yards, leaving no room for bermings and plantings to offset the increase in density. GRADING AND TREE LOSS There are 548 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. The majority of the trees are pine and spruce. Tree loss is calculated at 57% or 236 inches. This compares to the average tree loss of 30% for residential projects. Tree replacement required is 178 inches. The landscape plan meets this requirement. UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE Sewer and water is available to the site. A NURP pond is shown on the plan. Drainage easements must be acquired by the developer from the property owner to the south. 10 Staff Report Wynstone July 11, 1997 SIDEWALKS A five foot wide sidewalk is shown on the plan on the interior street. The sidewalk on Baker Road must be extended to the south property line. ACCESS The access to Baker Road has been approved by Hennepin County. Forest Hills Road is proposed to be extended with this project. The staff recommends the road connection for emergency vehicle access and to distribute traffic more evenly. The Planning Commission previously recommend against the road connection when Forest Hills 8th Addition was proposed. The City Council initially voted to extend the road, but later changed the decision to wait until the land area to the south was ready to develop and re-evaluate traffic and road connections at that time. If the road is not connected, Forest Hills 8th and Wynstone will have two ways in an out of the area. The homes to the west can use Golf View Drive to Valley View Road or Golf View Drive and Kingston Drive to Holly Road and to Baker Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff presents the Planning Commission with the following alternatives. Alternative One If the Planning Commission is believes that compelling reasons have been provided for changing the Comprehensive Guide plan from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, then one option would be to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Change from RI-22 to Rl- 13.5 and RM 6.5 and Preliminary Plat on plans dated July 11, 1997, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. /I Staff Report Wynstone July 11, 1997 2. Prior to Building Pennit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. The following waivers from the City code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the Rm 6.5 Zoning District: A. Waiver for lot size less than 3,000 square feet per unit. Alternative Two If the Planning Commission feels that compelling reasons have not been provided to change the guide plan from low density residential to medium residential, that the plan does not provide a transition in density, that tree loss is high, and the lot size waiver does not result in a better design then if the waivers were not granted then one option would be to recommend that the project be continued to allow adequate time to revise plans as follows. 1. Reduce the overall density to less than 2.5 units per acre. 2. Reduce tree loss to 30%. Alternative Three This is alternative one with no road connection. Alternative Four This is alternative two with no road connection. The staff recommends Alternative Two. J~ <33 \/ -:-; , /\\ / \ //1 " ....... : .....• : ... ;; -·1 1·: ... fi: .. 4.... y~ ~~~ " C-CO / / I RM-2.5 -:::\ C1\ \l' ~ / \ /; .... \~ ~\~ /z l,-I I Ji-- ~ ~--1f» --I )~: ri': -,. -.. ~ ~ 8ENSHOOF & ASSOC. INC. TEL No. ~ ., 612 832 9564 Jul 17,95 14:52 P.02 fo.eA II, JI~ BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 730' OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDI~, MN 55439/ (612) 832-9858 I FAX (612) 632-S564 July 17, 1995 REFER TO FILE; 95-40 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Alan Gray ~ A ~ James A. BenShOO~d Edward F. Terhaar £: f< RE: Traffic Forecasts for Forest Hill Road Area PURPOSE This memorandum is to provide the results of traffic forecasts for Forest Hill Road and the surrounding streets with and without the extension of Forest Hills Road to Baker Road. Under both scenarios, it is anticipated that 15 single family dwelling units will be built immediately west of Baker Road in the vicinity of the possible Forest Hill Road connection location. EXISTING TRAl!'FIC VOLUMES Existing daily traffic volumes were obtajned from City staff and are as follows: 640 on Tanager Lane south of Edenvale Blvd., 710 on Holly Road west of Rosemary Road, 750 on Kingston Drive south of Crown Drive, and 1550 on Golf View Drive north of Valley View Road_ The existing daily volume on Forest Hill Road was estimated at 210 based on the number of existing dwelling units. FOREST HILL ROAD EXTE.J.'lDElJ TO BAKER ROAD If Forest Hill Road is extended to Baker Road, the connection is expected to occur north of Arbor Glenn and will result in a "T" intersection. All of the planned 15 dwelling units would have direct access to Forest Hill Road. A connection with Theresa Place to the north is not proposed in the current development plan. The forecasting process involved dividing the area into smaller sub-areas based on their proximity and access to Forest Hills Road. Directional distribution percentlges were developed for each sub-area based on expected travel patterns. These percentages were applied to the calculated number of trips generated by each sub-area based on information provided by the City showing the number of residential lots in the area. The resultant daily traffic volumes are shown in Figure 1. FOREST Hll..L ROAD NOT EXTENDED TO BAKER ROAD If Forest Hill Road is not extended to Baker Road, access to the planned 15 dwelling units will be solely to Baker Road. Therefore, all of the traffic generated by these dwelling units will be added to Baker Road, resulting in no change to existing traffic volumes on the surrounding roads. /1., Hennepi!lpo~yQ,!:ln ty Mike Franzen City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Proposed Plat -Wynstone CSAH 60 Section 10, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Plat No. 2415 Review and Recommendations Dear Mr. Franzen: June 27, 1997 Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require county review of proposed plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: • The 50 foot right of way from the centerline of CSAH 60 plus the typical 10 foot easement are acceptable to Hennepin County. • The proposed street entrance, Candice Lane, is acceptable subject to the appropriate site grading for sight distance as shown on the attached plan. Hennepin County strongly encourages that an access easement be created, possibly across Outlot A's easterly area to provide future access to the existing residence and any other future redevelopment of Lot 3, Block 1. Creating this opportunity for alternate access to Lot 3 could result in a reduction of individual driveways onto CSAH 60 thereby enhancing its safety and efficiency. • All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for the appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within the county right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548. As a matter of procedure, we request that the City Clerk inform us of the City Council's action on the right of way and access provisions. Sincerely, ~~~dJAA_1_ Thomas D. ~~;:-P.~ Transportation Planning Engineer TDJjDKZjjh Department oCPubUc Works 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8496 (612)930-2500 FAX:(612)930-2513 TDD:(612)930-2696 11 cc: Pete Tulkki Dave Swenson BENSHOOF & RSSOC. INC. /-TEL No. 612 832 9564 Jul 17,95 14:53 ) J Mr. Alan Gray -2-July 17, 1995 FOREST HILL ROAD EXTENDED TO BAKER ROAD WITH A CONNECTION 1.'0 THERESA PLACE If Theresa Place was extended south to Forest Hill Road, the resultant traffic volumes would be very similar to the forecasted volumes with Forest Hill Road extended, as shown in Figure 1, except that approximately 50 vehicles per day would be added to Theresa Place north of Forest Hill Road and subtracted from Forest Hill Road west of Baker Road. The Theresa Place connection would provide an opportunity for the Porest Hill neighborhood to travel to and from the school on Holly Road without using Baker Road. 11) P.03 BEN..sHOOF, & RSSOC. INC. TEL No. 612 832 956~ Jul 17,95 14:53 P.04 LEGEND .J HOLLY RD. a: o ~ <!l .2 750/510 ~ NAl650 1-----' I"-~ I , FORESTHILL RD. wi N t NOT TO SCALE ~ EXISTING DAILY VOLUME AND VOLUME WITHOUT FOREST HILL RD. EXTENDED I I DAILY VOLUME WIni FOREST HILL RD. EXTENDED nJXX CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE (X) BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. V TRAJlSP<lRTATIOH EIiGINEElI$ AltO PLANNERa fOREST HILL RD. TRAFFIC FORECASTS EXISTING AND FORECASTED DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES .,-.... \ I""" \ 5-23-1997 8:23AM FRC'H OTTO ASSOCIATES_ 682 3522 P.1 KjOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY --~ ---Providing .5Qund, Balan~~d, Compreh~nsi~ Natural R!Sourct Solutions May 14, 1997 Mr. Marty Campion Otto Associates 9 West Division Street Buffalo, MN 55313 Re: Site Assessment for Wetlands on Jasper Property in Eden Prairie Within the NW1I4 Section lO, Tl16N, R22W Dear Mr. Campion; ~------------~, As you requested and at the authorization of Mr. Jasper, I have evaluated the above described parcel for the presence and extent of wetlands. The site evaluated is as shown on the site plan and topographic map that you provided. Prior to visiting the parcel, I reviewed available soils and National Wetlands Inventory (NWl) maps,. The NWI Inap ~QWS no wetlands on or adjacent to the ·propert)r. . . " .' . . . The Hennepin County soil survey shows the site with exclusively upland soils. These include Salida coarse sandy lo~ Burnsville sandy loam, and Kennebec silt loam. According to information provided in the SU1Vey and the Hydric Soils of the United States, these soils are not considered hydric and are not typically associated with wetlands. My site visit also revealed an absence of wetlands. The majority of the par eel was gradually and steeply sloped upland dominated by weedy tree and herbaceous species, including box elder, Chinese elm, brome grass, Canada goldenrod. A flat ridge on the southern half had 2 homes and smaller associated buildings. Vegetation in this area \VaS mowed lawn. Most of depressional area located in the northeast portion was maintained as lawn or infrequently mowed grasses, including upland species such as bluegrass and brome grass. The eastern-most extent of this depression included a small area of small trees and shrubs. This area was dominated by Chinese elm, honeysuckle, and red-osier dogwood. Herbaceous vegetation was dominated by Canada goldenrod, bluegrass, and dandelion. No wetland plant co~rnunity was present. Soils within the area had a black A-horizon (lOVR.2I1) to 12 inches, then a very dark brovm {1'OYR2/2) a-horizon. No hydric indicators were observed. Soils were dry within the 20 inch sample zones and did not indicate wetland conditions. 4ri$.~;~!;. .,..': ...... ~~.'r ·~~~lf·:~~ 4767 Richmond Road. Mound., Minn ... "t~ 55364 . Phone; 612-472-4875 . Fax: 612-472-1040 ?.o 5-23-1997 8:24AM FRQ~ OTTO ASSOCIATES_ 682 3522 Again, the NWI map and Soil Survey indicate no wetlands on the property. During observations made on the property on May 14, 1997» no wetland plant communities, hydric soils or indications of wetland hydrology were observed. If you have any questions, please contact me at the indicated number. Sincerely. KJOUIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY. INC P.2 Mike Franzen Planning Commission & Members City Of Eden Prairie July 14, 1997 7262 Vervoort Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55346 612-949-9365 Subject: Jasper Development-Project Wynstone To whom it may concern: We are unable to attend tonight's meeting and would like express our opinion in writing. We are against changing the development from low to medium density. We bulit our house at 7262 Vervoort Lane in 1989. We choose that location because of the dead end and very little traffic. Our children are two of the seven children in the neighborhood all under the age of five. We hope to keep development to a minimum due to increased traffic. Furthermore, we are also concerned about home. We have invested alot into it and the property as well has our neighbors. for more investment into our home in the the value of our have maintained ( We have plans near future.) Please note again our opinion is a vote of NO to the Wynstone Project changing the density. Thank you. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Harris 8 July 1997 Dear Members of the Planning Commission, We are writing to express our extreme displeasure of hearing that the City of Eden Prairie is one again reviving the issue of building Forest Hills Road to connect with Candice Lane. As new residents to Candice Lane, but six year resident homeowners in Eden Prairie, this is very disappointing news to us as well as the rest of our "Candice neighbors". We have some experience on this topic. Our prior residence in Eden Prairie was two houses from Highway 101 on Kristie Lane. As that entire area matured over the past six years, Kristie Lane became a major neighborhood outlet to and inlet from Highway 101. The traffic that went by our house constantly grew more numerous, louder and much faster. When the opportunity arose to buy our lot and build our home on Candice Lane, we felt, at last, we would live in a quiet and safe neighborhood for a very long time. If this road is allowed to connect, we will have accomplished nothing. We will have lost. We have built a more expensive home, but once again, with the likelihood of having hundreds of vehicles passing by daily to get to and from their homes in another neighborhood. We have spoken with our neighbors on Theresa Place, and understand that a couple of years ago this very same action was being planned. It was turned down. Forest Hills Road was never completed to Candice Lane. We'd like to think the residents on Theresa Place were the deciding factor then. We want to think the residents on Candice Lane will be the deciding factor now. Please, for our peace of mind and our substantial financial investment, do not allow this road to be completed. Respectfully, ~"~~~ Brian and Lugene Peissig 13712 Candice Larle Eden Prairie, MN 55346-3059 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 1, 1995 Page 5 VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Case, Thorimnson, Tyra-Lukens, Pidcock, and Harris voting "aye". VIT. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS vm. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. REOUEST FROM RESIDENTS OF THE EDENV ALE SUBDIVISION FOR COUNCIL TO OVERTURN DECISION ON FOREST HILL ROAD EXTENSION Jullie noted that this item was placed on the agenda at the request of the residents of the Edenvale Subdivision, who intended to submit a petition in support of their request not to extend Forest Hill Road. Steve Steele, 13985 Forest Hill Road, stated that many of the neighbors were present at the meeting in support of the request for the Council to allow Forest Hill Road to be a cul-de-sac. Marcia Kershaw, 14030 Forest Hill Road, stated that there are 17 homes on Forest Hill Road, with nineteen children living there between the ages of two and eighteen. She stated that five children are under the age of six. Many children play in the street, as there has been very little traffic on Forest Hill Road, and it has been safe. However, there are a number of steep driveways in the neighborhood, and in winter the cars slide down into the street so more traffic on Forest Hill Road would be a danger to everyone. If the roadway is connected, it will create another steep driveway at the end of Forest Hill Road. She requested the Council to keep Forest Hill Road as a cul-de-sac. Steve Steele described the traffic volume and believed the City should seek to provide another outlet for the Forest Hills area instead of making the connection. After talking to the residents in the area, he believed that the driving patterns of the residents would not change significantly, regarding the routes they presently take. He noted that Kingston would be open in the same way as it is today, and would be used by the residents in the Edenvale area but that would create some traffic hazards and safety issues are more of a concern. 24 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 1, 1995 Page 6 Mike Coash, l3980 Forest Hills Road, stated that the dead end had existed for the past 24 years and there have not been problems because the area is developed. He noted that the road serves the development but with the connection it will bring their neighborhood into connection with other homes and traffic. He was also concerned about the impact the connection could have on decreasing the property values in the neighborhood He noted that many children play in the street and if the road is connected it will be impossible for that to continue. He stated that many people in the neighborhood had purchased homes because it was a quiet neighborhood on a cul-de-sac, and homes had been marketed that way by realtors. He requested the Council to reconsider their decision. John Malio, 14000 Forest Hill Road, thanked City Staff for their help and assistance in the process. He submitted a petition to the City Council requesting that Forest Hill Road remain as a cul-de-sac because the residents of this neighborhood believe the connection would only add traffic and the new development should exit directly onto Baker Road. He commented that they had attempted to contact as many residents in the area as was possible, and in areas directly connected to Edenvale or in close proximity to Forest Hills. They obtained approximately 98 % support from those residents. He stated he believed that the gain to the community was not in proportion to the problems the connection would cause the residents. With no further presentation coming from the petitioners, Harris turned the discussion to the Council. Case believed that the residents needed to understand that the Forest Hills 8th Addition roadway connection could not be made until the City obtained the right-of-way to make that connection. He noted that many of the roadways in the city need to be connected to avoid a gridlock situation and provide for improved traffic patterns in the City. He believed neighborhoods needed to be involved in the process of development from beginning to completion, and should not always expect the outcome of City decisions to go their way. He believed a list of criteria should be developed for demonstrating the need for roadways to be connected throughout the City. Tyra-Lukens commended the neighbors for their presentation. She particularly liked their idea to clarify which roadways were intended to be connected, and noted that the connection was proposed to enhance emergency vehicle access, and not just provide for neighborhood traffic. She noted she was also concerned about how property was advertised as being on a cul-de-sac when in fact it was not intended to remain that way. Her major concern was the safety CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 1, 1995 Page 7 issues which had been raised by the residents. She believed the road could be left as a dead-end for the present, but the City should reserve the right to connect the road if it was deemed necessary in the future. Pidcock commented that she was very concerned about the safety issues involved with the steep driveways, and noted she had requested that signs be placed on streets which were intended to become through streets in the future, although that had not been done. She believed this situation was somewhat unique because it has been a dead-end for over 25 years, and she thought it could remain as a dead-end without adversely impacting the City. Thorfinnson stated he supported the motion as the roadway could be put through at some point in the future. He strongly advocated evaluating other proposed through-streets within the City and determining which were to be connected. He supported putting signs up to inform residents that those streets were proposed to be connected to other roadways in the future. He requested staff to provide Council with that information as soon as possible. MOTION: Case moved. seconded by Tyra-Lukens, that the City will obtain the right-of-way and will work with the residents and property owners to the south to develop a plan so that when the property to the south is developed the Council can determine at that time, whether the roadway connection is to be made. Motion carried unanimously. IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES A. SENIOR ISSUES TASK FORCE -Presentation of First Quarterly Report Jullie introduced Bette Anderson, Chair of the Senior Issues Task Force. Ms. Anderson introduced Dick Brown, Melissa Beckman, and Marvin Cofer, who were also present. Marvin Cofer stated they have an active group; they are enjoying the job and the proactive role the City is taking in anticipation of its changing demographics. They have a civic and personal interest in the group. Ms. Anderson presented the report. The Task Force studied the demographics for the community and the senior population has remained at about three percent and has kept up with the population growth, per the 1990 Census. She noted that this figure will only increase as time passes, and the population continues to age. The Task For~e believed that lower-priced housing in Eden Prairie will be a part of encouraging people to move in. Seniors are not a homogenous group now, and will probably never be. She noted there appears to be great variety and range in the types of people who fall into this category. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 1997 Page 3 C. WYNSTONE by Jasper Development. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.76 acres, PUD Concept Review on 9.01 acres, PUD District Review on 9.01 acres, Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RM-6.5 on 4.76 acres and RI-13.5 on 4.25 acres, and Preliminary Plat of9.01 acres into 31 lots. Location: Baker Road and Roberts Drive. Franzen noted that staff had notified residents within 500 feet of the property and received a call from John Mallow that this project would affect many more residents than those within that notification area due to the Forest Hills Road connection. Staff sent out notices to those residents who also would be impacted by this roadway connection. Jim Jasper, Jasper Development, reviewed the project for nine single family and twenty-two twin homes. The Guide Plan indicates that this land should be single family residential, but times are changing and the Guide Plan can be modified based on changes in housing needs within a community. There will be an increase of 65% in need for town homes because of the aging population and these people will need a place to live within the same community. He discussed transition between the single family and multi-family zoning and they have attempted to create a buffer by using single family lots and Baker Road, with the exception of the land to the south, which is vacant at this time. This will be developed in some way in the future, but there have been soil problems which have delayed this process. Jasper described the town homes and the style and architecture which was proposed. The price range will vary from $140,000 to $180,00 with others in between. The single family homes will be between $180,000 and $200,000 in price, depending on the location. He noted that a fair number of the trees on the site have been planted in the last 25-30 years. The tree loss numbers appear to be significant, but if only indigenous trees are considered, the number of significant trees that will be lost is only about 20%. This area is not considered to be an extensive wildlife habitat, and there are no wetlands that would be lost. He described the topography on the site and noted that a great deal of grading will be needed to construct a through roadway on the site. There will be a Homeowner's Association that will be responsible for the maintenance of the site, and there will be two retention ponds located on the property. There will be a two-tiered retaining wall on the south side of the development which will be fully landscaped. They propose to extend Forest Hill Road to Bake Road to facilitate traffic flow within the development. Jasper discussed the single family lots exceed the minimum square footage requirements. He commented that town homes represent a desirable alterative to single family homes for some homeowners, and it is not appropriate to zone the less desirable land for multi-family and keep the best land for the single family homes. Clinton inquired how many neighborhood meetings the developer had held and Jasper responded they had held one, which approximately 45 residents attended. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 1997 Page 4 Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted that the City has approved several large multi-family projects in Eden Prairie over the last several years for people who want to move out of a large home into a smaller one. These projects were in areas already planned for higher densities. He discussed the density issue and how it relates to other developments in the area. He noted the staff recommended Alternative II in the staff report, which would reduce the density and amount of tree loss and connect the roadway to distribute traffic more evenly throughout the area. Foote asked about the land to the south and how it would be accessed. Franzen responded that it would not access Baker Road. It would be an extension of the existing cul-de-sac. Ismail commented that because of the proximity of his home to the site and the presence of many friends and neighbors, he would abstain from voting or commenting on this proj ect. The Public Hearing was opened. John Mallow, 14000 Forest Hills Road, stated that about two years ago they came before the Planning Commission regarding the roadway connection issue and the Planning Commission had assured the residents that it would not be connected. The City Council had overturned this decision and then the Council reversed that decision based on more information presented by the residents, although they opted to keep the right-of-way in case the need was shown that the roadway should be connected in the future. The grade on the existing roadway is very steep and there are many curves, which make winter navigation hazardous and difficult. It has been a dead-end street for 20 years and to connect it now would disrupt the entire neighborhood. He noted a petition had been submitted in opposition to the roadway being connected. Jim Brandser, 7238 Vervoort Lane, stated his back yard backs up to this development on the south side, and all that land is not vacant, as represented by the proponent. The project does not fit in with the character of the existing development. He believed the retaining wall was too high, and would damage his property values. Terry Willms en, 7265 Vervoort Lane, stated he was opposed to the project as proposed. He purchased his home 5 months ago and had been told the vacant land was zoned for single family residential. He was opposed to the density of the project, and believed it was too high. There is wildlife in this area, and development would destroy habitat. The buffer zone was inadequate and he did not believe the project fit in with the character of the existing neighborhood. Dick Feerick, 7365 Howard Lane, stated he worked with Jasper on the St. Andrew's Bluffs development and the quality of his developments was exemplary. This project has the potential to be a similar development. There is a need for housing of this kind for people who wish to live independently but do not want the burden of yard work and maintaining a single family home. He requested that the Planning Commission approve the project. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 1997 Page 5 Mike Dietrich, 13736 Candice Lane, expressed concern about extending Forest Hills Lane because of the children in the neighborhood, and the traffic dangers such a connection would present. He commented he owns a home and has three vacant lots on Candice Lane yet to be developed, and he believed the project would adversely affect his property values. Jim Carroll, 13720 Jennifer Court, stated he purchased a single family home because he enjoys puttering in his yard, and he is over 55 which doesn't mean he has to live in a town home. He suggested the buffer on the south side be changed to single family to provide more buffering between the existing single family homes and the multi-family homes proposed. Scott Ringhand, 7270 Vervoort Lane, stated he concurred with comments made by his neighbors and was opposed to the density of the project. He believed the land should be developed with single family housing to be consistent with the existing neighborhood. He was also opposed to connecting the roadway. Wayne Zeien, 7246 Vervoort Lane, stated his property abuts the south border of the project. He was concerned about the impact of the project and believed the density was too high. The buffering was inadequate on the south side of the project. The retaining wall was a good idea but the slope was too steep. The tree loss was too high, even when the junk trees were excluded. The developer had withdrawn a prior plan for the land on the south side because of density issues. Duane Dietrich, 12400 Whitewater Drive, stated he represented the property owner who owns the property to the north of the project site. He concurred with the residents that spot zoning to put town homes in this location was not good. The cost ofland was so high that if the density is not approved the land will not develop. He read a letter which they sent to the neighborhood residents which elucidated their objections to the connection of Forest Hills Road to Bake Road. Foote inquired what the prices for the homes in the development were and Dietrich responded the average price was about $260,000 to $300,000. The land costs averaged out to be about $60,000 per lot. Discussion ensued regarding density versus land costs, which can determine end product costs. Tom Schrimm, 7151 Prairieview Drive, stated he did not object to having town homes but he felt the density was too high. They would like to keep the hill and do not want to see the roadway connected. Lyndon Moquist, 13722 Candice Lane, stated Forest Hills Road should not be connected. He believed overall values should be considered, and expressed concern the density was too high. He believed single family should be continued and the town homes should not be built in this location. He believed land value should not be the determining factor in density decisions. He discussed housing costs in Eden Prairie and surrounding communities. He expressed concern regarding the amount of tree loss and was concerned about the screening and buffering of the project. zq PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 1997 Page 6 Damon and Teri Ground, 13700 Candice Lane, stated they were opposed to the project because the density was too high, and they were opposed to the roadway being connected. They were also opposed to the construction of town homes in this location and as this development would be an extension of Candice Lane, they believed the single family homes should be extended. Marsha Kershaw, 14030 Forest Hills Road, stated she did not want to see the roadway connected because there were many small children in the neighborhood. The roadway was very dangerous now and to make this road a through street would only make it more dangerous. She described the grades and the potential hazards of increasing traffic on the street. Deb Ranglin, 1375 Jennifer Court, stated she was opposed to the development, and did not want to look at townhomes. She stated she works out of her home and her view would be impeded by the townhomes. She did not believe town homes would fit into the character of the neighborhood. Wilbur Gersuick, 7102 Baker Road, stated he has lived there for thirty-seven years and he was in support of this project. He believed the proponent would do an excellent job with the development and because this development will be located in his back yard, he has no objection to it at all. Wissner inquired if the Arbor Glen townhomes were built first or the single family and Franzen responded the townhomes were constructed first. Alexander commented that not everyone in Eden Prairie could afford $300,000 to $400,000 homes and if the proposed townhomes were attractively built there was no reason why they could not be accommodated. There are some across the street which were there before the single family homes were built. Foote commented that Jasper built quality homes, and thought single family homes would fit in better with the existing neighborhood. He was concerned about the density. He commented he was also concerned that the neighborhood residents thought $250,000 single family homes were not "upscale" enough for this area of Eden Prairie. He would like to see Forest Hills Road connected but this was a unique roadway because of the grades and it would be dangerous to make it a through street. He requested that the right-of-way be preserved in case it were needed in the future. Habicht commented that there has been a standard established that to deviate from the Guide Plan there must be compelling reasons and he has not heard a compelling reason why the Commission should do that. The density was too high, and he believed the roadway connection issue should be discussed. Wissner stated that she was concerned about the density of the project, rather than the pricing of the units, and she also had not heard a compelling reason why the Guide Plan should be modified. She suggested the proponent come back before the Commission with a reason to change the density. She believed the roadway 30 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 1997 Page 7 connection issue was a moot point at this time. Jasper stated that not everyone in Eden Prairie was rich and they were trying to provide homes at a reasonable cost. The new residents on Candice Lane appeared to be setting the tone for what went on in this neighborhood as most of the surrounding homes are much lower in price. MOTION: Foote moved, seconded by Habicht to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0-1. Ismail abstained. Clinton stated he had not seen a compelling reason to change the Guide Plan. He requested the developer to come back to the Commission with a plan that fit the density. The tree loss was too high, and transition between the development and the neighborhood was a problem. He asked if the proponent would resubmit a plan if the Commission continued the request. Jasper asked the Commission to vote on the merits of the submitted project, and noted that economics were a compelling reason for the proposed density of the project. MOTION: Habicht moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend to the City Council denial ofWynstone by Jasper Development for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 4.76 acres, PUD Concept Review on 9.01 acres, PUD District Review on 9.01 acres, Zoning District Change from RI-22 to RM-6.5 on 4.76 acres and RI-13.5 on 4.25 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 9.01 acres into 31 lots because no compelling reason was demonstrated to change the Guide Plan. Motion carried 3-1-2. Alexander voted no, Ismail and Wissner abstained. To: Through: From: Date: Subject: BACKGROUND: Memorandum Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Stuart A. Fox~fnager of Parks and Natural Resources July 17, 1997 Supplemental Staff Report to the July 11, 1997 Planning Staff Report of Wynstone This project is located along Baker Road and north of Saint Andrews Drive. The project is 9.01 acres in size and the developer is asking for a Guide Plan change from low density residential to medium density residential. NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES Tree Loss This project which involves some single family homes on large lots is impacted by tree issues. Currently, there are 39 trees defined as significant under the ordinance. Many of the trees that are on the site were planted evergreens and Siberian elm, which have grown up as wilding trees around several of the houses and out buildings. In addition, there is a variety of trees such as apple, cottonwood, maple, and hackberry. The tree loss on the site would involve 23 ofthe 39 significant trees and 312 diameter inches of the significant trees. This results in a net tree loss of 57%. Due to the mass grading on the site, the majority of trees, significant and non significant, will be removed to implement the proposed grade changes. The majority of the trees that will be remaining after the proposed grading are in the backyard of the existing house on the northeast comer of the site. Mitigation for the tree loss of 312 diameter inches would require the developer to plant 236 caliper inches of replacement trees. The landscape plan that was submitted to comply with the tree replacement and screening requirements for the project meets City Code. However, the landscape plan is very limited in the selection of trees. It designates two types of deciduous trees, Norway maple and sugar maple and one type of conifer, Black Hills spruce. The crabapples that are listed are considered orruirnentals and do not court towards the mitigation for tree loss; however, they do meet the landscaping screening requirements. The Black Hills spruce are being used as a screen buffer along the northerly three twin units and along the Baker Road. Staff feels that a more diverse landscape, including other varieties of trees would certainly help the landscape plan. NURP Pond The developers has proposed a NURP pond in the south central portion of the project. This pond would have to be reviewed by the City Engineering Department to check for size correctness and also outflow rates. Overflow from the NURP pond will go southward and exit onto the lot south of the property. Easement for discharge of water will be necessary in order to have this pond discharge as shown. Sidewalks and Trails The developers is proposing to place' a five foot concrete sidewalk along the westerly and southerly portions of Candice Lane. This sidewalk would match the existing sidewalk north of the Forest Hill Road extension. In addition, there is an existing five foot concrete sidewalk along the westerly side of Baker Road (County Road 60). Staff is requesting that the five foot sidewalk be continued southward to the southerly end of the proposed Wynstone development. This sidewalk will be installed in the County's right-of-way and the developer would be responsible for installation as per Hennepin County design criteria. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed at the July 14, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. The project was not approved as presented on a vote of four against, one for, and two abstentions. The major concern that was discussed by the Planning Commission was the density issue for the multi-family portion of the development. The developer has requested that the project be placed on the August 5, 1997 City Council meeting and staff would appreciate any comments related to this project that can be forwarded to the Council for that meeting. SAF:mdd Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 21,1997 v. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Wynstone Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated July 17, 1997 from Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; and a staffreport dated July 11, 1997 from Michael D. Franzen, City Planner. Jim Jasper, developer, reviewed the development proposal with the Commission including the site plan and landscaping plan. The proposal is for nine single family lots with minimum lot size of 13,500 square feet and the balance of the property on the south and east butts into 22 twinhome sites. The twinhome project is intended primarily to answer the response to the need for housing for 55 and older people. The homes will sell in the price range of approximately $140,000 to 177,000. He reviewed the concerns of the tree loss and gave background information about the piece of property and how they perceive this property. He explained that over time some of the people planted apple trees and nearly all of the trees on the tree inventory were clustered around the houses that are there now. Most of those trees in their estimation are too large to successfully move. Therefore, they took the most pessimistic view point of what the tree loss would be and calculated that into what the tree loss is expected to be. This is one of the reasons the tree loss is so high. They are also faced with the dilemma of how to connect the road system, meet the City standards of grade, and make this all work out. There are some mature trees around the house in the middle that look suspicious in terms of their health and the quality of the trees being lost is not necessarily high. The tree replacement plan will nearly double the caliper inches that will be planted on the property compared to what is there now. Two retaining walls are proposed along the southerly border similar to what was proposed at St. Andrew's Bluff on the other side of the road. The plan is to construct a wall and soften it with plantings along the wall so as they mature they won't end up with a solid mass wall. There has been such an increasing change in the market in terms of housing that it's appropriate that a community like Eden Prairie look at sites, other than those they currently have guided under their plan, as to the appropriateness for housing like this. Fox reviewed the staff report with the Commission. There were 39 trees found 2 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 21,1997 significant under the ordinance on this site. In addition, there are 38 Elms on the site which were not considered significant because of the designation of the ordinance. Of the significant trees on the site, most of them are what is called, household or normal landscaping trees. Since this is an older neighborhood, a number of trees were planted. However, staff was directed by the City Council, when a similar project came in over on Franlo Road, to consider all trees as, per ordinance, as significant and that's the reason the staff report does reflect that. 23 of the trees would be lost on the site primarily because of the extensive grading that needs to go in to make the road path, as well as the utilities, and that's a tree loss of 57 percent. Basically, 16 of the 39 trees would be saved. In the landscaping plan, the developer is required to mitigate 236 inches of trees. However, they have a plan that represents about 363 inches. Staff did have some concerns about the limited usage of trees that are basically three varieties selected; sugar maples, Norway maples, and Black Hills spruce. The replacement is 4: 1 so every tree being lost will be mitigated with four replacement trees. A NURP pond is proposed in the south central portion of the project. This pond would have to be reviewed by the City Engineering Department to check for size correctness and also outflow rates. Overflow from the NURP pond will go southward and exit onto the lot south of the property. Easement for discharge of water will be necessary in order to have this pond discharge as shown. There is an existing five foot concrete sidewalk along the westerly side of Baker Road. Staff requested that the five foot sidewalk be continued southward to the southerly end of the proposed Wynstone development. This sidewalk will be installed in the County's right-of-way and the developer would be responsible for installation, as per, Hennepin County design criteria. This project was reviewed at the July 14, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. It was not approved 4-1-2. Mike Franzen's concerns seem to be about the density issue with the multi-family and the units per acre that were proposed. Jim Branzer, Eden Prairie resident, indicated where he lives on the map. He noted he was not against the development because it's positive for the City, but he was uncomfortable with high density. Before he bought his home he was told it would be low density. There is a big drainage ditch on the side of his house and he was concerned if this project would be draining towards his house. He was also not looking forward to looking at a cement wall in the back. Everyone in his area have small children and are concerned about the increase of cars in the area. 3 35 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 21, 1997 Scott Rankman, E-den Prairie resident, commented looking out his windows to the north all they see are trees and was concerned about the tree loss. He was also concerned about the trees blocking their view of Baker Road and the wildlife in the area. He was opposed to the guide plan change from low to high. Prior to buying his house he checked out the zoning and now it's being changed. Jasper commented that these residents are going to be primarily impacted by four buildings that back up to the southerly boundary line. The mass of those buildings is really not much greater than it would be for two-story homes with three car garages. Furthermore, these twinhomes are proposed to be further from the property line that it would have to be for single family homes. Regarding the drainage, they are not permitted to drain on somebody else's property without an easement and the Engineering Department will require that they address that issue. The reason for the concrete wall is they are durable and require no maintenance. They have texture and color and are not a plain concrete wall. He stressed that they intend to soften the wall with landscaping as much as possible. Koenig asked about the health of the existing trees. Fox said there are some that are damaged just like any typical yard tree. He didn't see anything major that would discount any ofthe trees that were counted on the inventory. Koenig asked if the developer would be willing to increase the number of varieties in the replacement plan as suggested by staff. Jasper said they would be willing to consider variety and would like some direction from staff as to what they think appropriate variety is. Koenig asked that the developer come back and show the Commission what his plan is. Fox replied if the Commission wants to make a recommendation they can certainly carry that recommendation forward to the City Council on August 5, 1997. Hilgeman commented she was happy with the 4: 1 requirement. She was not happy with the density change and the transition on the southern side. This is no different than the Planning Commission approving previously what was 100 percent tree loss on in fill lots. It's hard to deny it when the replacement plan looks really good. Koenig noted the 100 percent tree loss was a commercial/industrial site where tree loss is generally higher than it is at residential. Brown was concerned whether the two large homes on the north edge of the property are about the same size as the homes that exist on the expensive addition on top. Jasper did not know and noted that question came up at the public hearing of the Planning Commission. The neighbors in that development seem to be concerned 4 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday, July 21, 1997 about the value of their neighborhood if these homes do not continue in the price range of $265,000 to $330,000. If you look at the surrounding neighborhoods, the expensive homes are the exception. He said they feel they are doing what was character of the neighborhood. They intend to customize all those homes and it will be simply what the market demands. Koenig referred to the Hennepin County sidewalk and asked if they can require the developer to put that in when it's actually on Hennepin County property. Fox said yes and briefly explained the process. Brown asked if this plan could be redesigned and still be financially feasible to come out with less density, less excavation, less runoff and more replacement. Jasper said it's not economically feasible at a lower density than what's been proposed. MOTION: Hilgeman moved, seconded by Jacobson, to approve the Wynstone Development with the requirement that the developer will meet with staff to come up with definite plans that include more diversity and make every attempt to reduce tree loss. Koenig said since this was turned down by the Planning Commission she would have appreciated the developer taking the recommendation a little more serious before they got to the Parks Commission to come up with a better landscape plan. Brown was uncomfortable with the motion because he thought the whole plan could be redesigned where there is not 57 percent tree loss. The motion failed on a 2-3 vote with the no votes by Brown, Corneille, and Koenig. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Miller SprinK Improvement Project Staffreferred the Commission to a memo dated July 10, 1997, from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. Lambert explained the City Council did approve proceeding with some design and gave Barr Engineering direction. It turned out they did not like the design with all the rip rap nor did they like the size and scale of the gazebo. He noted the Heritage Preservation Commission did not like the plan either. He has had some discussion 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: August 5, 1997 SECTION: Public Hearing HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) SECTION: Regular Meeting DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO: v.B~ Community Development Tax Increment Financing for Chris Enger Edenvale Townhouse Project David Lindahl REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt a Resolution approving the Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 for Edenvale Townhomes. REQUESTED BRA ACTION: Adopt a Resolution adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Qualified Housing) District No. 14 BACKGROUND: Developers of the 32 unit Edenvale Townhouse project at the southeast comer of Mitchell Road and Valley View Road have requested Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to help provide rents affordable to lower income families. The development will qualifY toward meeting the City's 1997 Livable Communities rental housing goals. The income limits and proposed rents are as follows: Income Proposed Proposed Comparable Famil~ Siz~ Limit (~Q%) B~drQQJm Rents R~nts in E,P, (TQwnhQYS~S) One $20,050 1 $536 $900 -$1,000 Two $22,900 2 $645 $1,000 -$1,200 Three $25,800 3 $745 $1,200 -$1,400 Four $28,650 4 $831 Five $30,950 Six $33,250 The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Tax Increment Plan for the Edenvale project July 14, 1997, and unanimously approved the zoning for the development June 23, 1997. The City Council gave first reading approval of the rezoning July 15, 1997. Springsted Incorporated, the City's financial advisors, have evaluated the proposal and determined that but for the use of TIF to help finance the development, it would not otherwise occur. Beginning in 1999 the City will collect full taxes from the development and return 90% of them back each year for thirteen years. The total TIF expected to be contributed to the development over this time has a present value of$233,825, and will be repaid to the City in twenty-five years. I Using TIF to finance low income and elderly housing is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and has been used to finance Sterling Ponds and Elim Shores elderly housing projects, and the Columbine Townhouse project. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: Memo dated July 25, 1997. Resolution approving Tax Increment Plan for City Council Resolution adopting the Tax Increment Plan for HRA Tax Increment Plan for the Edenvale project MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority THROUGH: Chris Enger, Community Development Director FROM: David Lindahl, HRA Manager DATE: July 25, 1997 SUBJECT: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan for the Edenvale Townhouse Project The proposed Edenvale Townhouse project will provide 32 townhouse units for low-income families and will be credited toward meeting the City'S Livable Communities Act obligations for 1997. The developer has requested Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the City to help finance the project in order to help offset high land costs and reduce rents. Springsted Incorporated, the City's financial advisor, has evaluated the proposal and determined that without public assistance the project would not be financially feasible. The project is proposed to be financed using a combination of public financing tools including: Low Income Housing Tax Credits -Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Low Income Housing Incentives Account -Metro Council Family Housing Fund -MPLS Non Profit Public Housing (5 units) -MPLS Public Housing Agency Tax Increment Financing -City Eden Prairie CDBG -HUD/City of Eden Prairie $1,800,000 $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 538,000 $ 233,825 $ 187.524 $3,259,349 The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Tax Increment Plan for the Edenvale project July 14, 1997, and unanimously approved the zoning for the development June 23, 1997. First reading approval ofthe rezoning was granted by the City Council July 15, 1997. State Statute requires the City Council and HRA to review and approve the enclosed TIF Plan. The City Council, who is also the HRA, can simultaneously open a public hearing as a Council and call a meeting as an HRA to review and act on the TIF Plans. Tax Increment FinancinK Plan The total TIF requested by the developer is $233,825. If the Plan is approved by the Council, the City will provide TIF benefits annually on a "pay as you go" basis, provided the project generates enough taxes. Future tax revenue generated from the project will be used to help finance the development. Each year for thirteen years the City will collect full taxes from the project's owners and return a portion back to them. The need for TIF is outlined on pages three and four of the Plan. This infonnation was supported by the City's financial advisor after conducting a complete financial analysis the project. At least 80% of the value of improvements made to the project with TIF funds must be for low and moderate income persons. The project clearly qualifies as a Housing District since 100% of the units will be affordable to persons with incomes at or below 50% of the median income for the Metro Area, and when adjusted for family size are as follows: Family Size One Two Three Four Five Six TIF Repayment: Income Limit (50%) $20,050 $22,900 $25,800 $28,650 $30,950 $33,250 Proposed Bedrooms 1 2 3 4 Proposed Rents $536 $645 $745 $831 Comparable Rents in E.P. (Townhouses) $900 -1,000 $1,000 -1,200 $1,200 -1,400 The developer has agreed to repay the City for the TIF they receive, with repayment occurring in 25 years (2022), or when the project sells, whichever happens first. Repayment will be secured through a second mortgage. The repayment terms are similar to that used for the Columbine project approved in 1996. All TIF funds returned to the City will be available to renovate the project if necessary, or will be returned to all other taxing jurisdictions (school, county, etc.). The City has used TIF financing in the past to help finance the following three housing projects: Sterling Ponds Elderly Apartments (56 units) $1,500,000 in TIF Elim Shores Elderly Apartment (61 units) about $800,000 in TIF Columbine Townhomes (32 units) about $375,000 in TIF CDBG Repayment: The City will also have a separate repayment agreement for a $187,524 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) loan that will be used to help write down land costs for the project. The developer has agreed to repay the CDBO loan with interest (5%) beginning in 2000. The loan will be completely repaid by 2013 with total principal and interest repayment of$313,405. The City has been banking CDBG funds for the two years for the purpose of helping provide affordable rental housing. The Council approved the use of these CDBG funds for this purpose at public hearings held in 1996 and 1997. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan: The City's Comprehensive Plan includes a variety of goals related to affordable housing and the use of City financing tools to accomplish these goals. Specific goals from the Comprehensive Plan that relate to the Edenvale proposal, goals reaffirmed by the Planning Commission and City Council in 4 1994, are as follows: Lower Development Costs of Low Income and Elderly Development by Reducing Fees and Offer Support of Development Costs with CDBG Funds, Tax Increment Financing, and Other Possible Means. Use Full Authority of the City's Housing and Redevelopment Authority to Support Development of Low Income and Elderly Housing Projects. Utilize PUD Approach to Evaluate Specific Projects. Encourage Low Income and Elderly Housing Developments Throughout Eden Prairie and Provide Quality Services Required by Residents. 5 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE PROJECT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.5 IN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE AND THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (QUALIFIED HOUSING) DISTRICT NO. 14 BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. On December 17. 1996, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Authority") pursuant to Mirmesota Statutes Section 469.001 to 469.047. as amended, approved Redevelopment Project No.5 and a Redevelopment Plan relating thereto, and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing ("Redevelopment District"), District No. 13 (the "Tax Increment Plan"). 2. It has been further proposed that the Authority approve the creation of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 and approve and adopt the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 3. The Authority has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared with respect thereto the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 14, defining more precisely the property to be included, the public cost to be incurred and other matters relating thereto. 4. The Authority has performed all actions required by law to be perfonned prior to the approval and adoption of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan. 5. The Authority hereby detennines that it is necessary and in the best interest of the City and the Authority at this time to create proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 and to approve and adopt the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto. 6. Adoption. The Tax Increment Financing Plan is hereby adopted subject to approval by the City Council as provided in Section 8 based on the findings in Section 7. 7. Findings. The Authority hereby makes the following findings: a. The tax increment financing district to be established pursuant to the Tax Increment Plan (the "District"). based on the information in the Tax Increment Plan and representations of the developer, consists of a project intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defined in Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1937, as amended, or similar federal legislation and the regulations promulgated thereunder. As evidence thereof, the developer represents that the project qualifies for the low-income housing tax credit under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The project to be constructed in the District consists only of housing for individuals or families of low or moderate income, and no commercial or other uses are contemplated therein. Therefore, the District qualifies as a "housing district" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision 11. The income limitations of Section 469.1761 of the Act are applicable to tenants in the project, because the District is not located in a targeted area as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 462C.02, Subdivision 9, Clause (e). b. The proposed development, in the opinion of the Authority, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary since private developers could not economically develop the project without the proposed subsidy. 8. Transmittal. The Authority does hereby transmit the Project Plan and the Tax Increment Plan to the Eden Prairie City Council for approval after the same has been considered by the Council subsequent to a public hearing to be held in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 469. 9. Additional AODrovals. It is contemplated the public financial contribution contemplated in the Tax Increment Financing Plan, including but not limited to, tax. increment financing and Community Development Block Grant funds, will be secured by way of a mortgage on the property in the District. It is further contemplated that the developer will obtain construction andlor permanent financing and that it will be necessary for the security granted to the City andlor Authority to be subordinated to that of the developer's lender. The approval hereby given to the Tax Increment Financing Plan includes approval and the execution by the appropriate officers of the Authority of such additional documents necessary to acquire a secured interest in the property and to subordinate such interest, including a contingent assignment of any agreements regarding tax increment financing between the developer and the City andlor Authority, to the lien of the developer's construction and/or permanent financing. The Chair and Executive Director are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish certified copies of all proceedings and records of the Authority relating to this transaction and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating thereto as such facts appear on the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the Authority as to the truth of all statements contained therein. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes the approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the Authority's counsel and the officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said officials are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the 1 Authority. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the Authority herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. 10. Filing. Following approval by the City Council, the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file the Project Plan and the Tax Increment Plan with the Commissioner of Revenue as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.175, Subdivision 2. Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, this 5th day of August, 1997. Chair Attest: ________ -___ -- Secretary CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. __ A RESOLUTION RELATING TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.5 AND CREATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 14 AND APPROVING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATED THERETO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. On December 17, 1996, the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.001 to 469.047, as amended, approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002, Subdivision 16, designated as the Project Plan (the "Project Plan") for redevelopment Project No.5 (the "Project Area") and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002, Subdivision 14 (the "Redevelopment Project"). 1.02. Pursuant to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended (the "Act"), this Council established Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 and adopted a Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor (the "Original Plan") on December 17, 1996. Pursuant to the Act, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "Authority") has adopted a tax. increment fmancing plan for the proposed Tax Increment Financing (tlQualified Housing"), District No. 14 (the "Financing Plan"), which is now before this Council for approval. The Financing Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Project Plan and is the proposed method for financing certain public redevelopment costs of certain of the redevelopment activities to be undertaken pursuant to the Project Plan. The proposed tax increment financing (" Qualified Housing"), District No. 14 (the "District"), comprises one tax parcel within the redevelopment project as described in the financing plan. 1.03. Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Hellllepin County and of the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 272 have been given an opportunity to meet with the City and comment on the Financing Plan. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.175. Subdivision 3, this Council on August 5~ 1997, conducted a public hearing on the desirability of approving the Financing Plan. Notice of the public hearing was duly published as required by law in the Eden Prairie News, the official newspaper of the City, on July 24, 1997. The City has [not] received written comments on the Financing Plan from the county and the school district after providing the county and the school district boards with information on the fiscal and economic implications of the Financing Plan not less than 30 days before the date of the public hearing. 1.04. In addition to the notice and opportunity described in Section 1.03, as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.175, Subdivision 2a, the City, not less than 30 days before the publication of the notice of public hearing referred to in Section 1.03 delivered written notice to the members of the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County who represents the District. The notice contained a general description of the boundaries of the District, the proposed development activities to be undertaken therein, an offer by representatives of the City to meet and discuss the proposed District with the county com.missioner and a solicitation of the commissioner's comments with respect to the District. Section 2. A'pproval of Financing Plan. On the basis of the Financing Plan and the information elicited at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 2.01. The financing Plan provides the means to finance certain public redevelopment costs of the Redevelopment Project, including the redevelopment activities described in the Project Plan which benefit the District. The Financing Plan contains a statement of objectives for the improvement of the Redevelopment Project, a statement as to the development program for the District and a statement of the property within the Redevelopment Project which the City intends to acquire. The Financing Plan also estimates the public redevelopment costs of the Redevelopment Project, the amoWlt of bonded indebtedness to be incurred (not to exceed $355,000.00)! the sources of revenues to finance or otherwise pay public costs of the District, the most recent net tax capacity of taxable real property within the District, the captured net tax capacity of the District at completion and the duration of the District. The Financing Plan also describes and identifies the development activities to be undertaken or expected to be undertaken in the District. The Financing Plan further contains alternative estimates of the impact of the proposed tax increment financing on the net tax capacities of all taxing jurisdictions in which the District is located. All the captured tax capacity is necessary for the objectives of the District. 2.02. This Council hereby finds that the District is a geographic area within a "project" as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision 8, and is a proper tax increment financing district within the meaning of Section 469.174, Subdivision 9. This Council further finds, based on the infonnation in the Financing Plan and representations of the developer, that the District consists of a project intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defmed in Chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended; Title V of the Housing Act of 1937, as amended, or similar federal legislation and the regulations promulgated thereunder. As evidence thereof, the developer represents that the project qualifies for the low-income housing tax credit under Section 42 of the Internal Review Code of 1986, as amended. The project to be constructed in the District consists only of housing for individual or families of low or moderate income, and no commercial or other uses are contemplated therein. Therefore, the District qualifies as a "housing district" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision 11. The income limitations of Section 469.1761 of the Act are applicable to tenants in the project, because the District is not located in a targeted area as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 462C.02, Subdivision 9, Clause (e). 10 2.03. This Council hereby fmds that the private redevelopment proposed to be encouraged in the Redevelopment Project pursuant to the Project Plan would not, in the opinion of this Council, occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Without tax increment financing of the costs of the redevelopment activities generally described by the Project Plan which increases the financial feasibility of the proposed redevelopment, private investment would not develop the District within the reasonably foreseeable future. The studies and analyses supporting this finding are identified in the Financing Plan. 2.04. This Council hereby finds that the Financing Plan confoxms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The development is compatible with the City's zoning ordinances and other related regulations and encourages efficient use of existing infrastrocture as set forth in the City's Land Use Plan. 2.05. This Council hereby finds that the Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the District by private entetprise. The redevelopment activities contemplated in the Project Plan would help to retard blight in the Redevelopment Project and provide an increase in low and moderate income housing opportunities in the City and enhance the tax base of the City. 2.06. As required by Section 49.176, Subdivision 4d, it is expected that all of the tax increment to be derived from the District will be used to finance costs of the low and moderate income housing project, including the costs of public improvements directly related thereto and allocable administration expenses of the Redevelopment Project. 2.07. Upon review of the Financing Plan, the information elicited at the public hearing and on the basis of the findings in Sections 2.01 to 2.06, this Council hereby approves the Financing Plan and the establishment of the District as a tax increment financing district in the City, to be denominated "Tax Increment Financing (Qualified Housing) District No. 14. Section 3. Additional Approvals. It is contemplated the public financial contribution contemplated in the Tax Increment Financing Plan, including but not limited to, tax increment financing and Community Development Block Grant funds, will be secured by way of a mortgage on the property in the District. It is further contemplated that the developer will obtain construction and/or permanent financing and that it will be necessary for the security granted to the City and/or Authority to be subordinated to that of the developer's lender. The approval hereby given to the Tax Increment Financing Plan includes approval and the execution by the appropriate officers of the City of such additional documents necessary to acquire a secured interest in the property and to subordinate such interest, including a contingent assignment of any agreements regarding tax increment financing between the developer and the City andlor Authority, to the lien of the developer's construction andlor permanent financing. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to this transaction and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating thereto as such facts appear on the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes the approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the City's counsel and the officials authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and said officials are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the tenns hereof. Passed by the City Council this 5th day of August} 1997. Dr. Jean Harris, Mayor Attest~ ____________________________ _ John D. Frane, City Finance Director/Clerk ,~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar 8/5/97 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO . Finance . Payment of Claims VI. Checks 54055 to 54716 Action/Direction: Approve Payment of Claims I COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) DIVISION TOTAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NiA LEGISLATIVE LEGAL COUNSEL GENERAL~SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DATA PROCESSING CITY MANAGER FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMUNITY SERVICE SOCIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS FACILITIES ASSESSING CIVIL DEFENSE POLICE FIRE ANIMAL CONTROL PARK ADMIN STREETS & TRAFFIC PARK MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING FLEET SERVICES ORGANIZED ATHLETICS COMMUNITY DEV COMMUNITY CENTER BEACHES HISTORICAL YOUTH RECREATION SPECIAL EVENTS ADULT RECREATION RECREATION ADMIN ADAPTIVE REC OAK POINT POOL ARTS PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CITY CENTER SW METRO TRANSIT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS PRAIRIE VILLAGE PRAIRIEVIEW CUB FOODS PRESERVE TRUST FUNDS WATER DEPT SEWER DEPT STORM DRAINAGE AGENCY FUNDS EQUIPMENT $35,998.17 $308.83 -$50.00 $7,342.00 $5,842.13 $70,104.52 $1,202.73 $9,698.11 $3,156.97 $10,500.19 $11,625.50 $79.28 $104.42 $10,108.21 $6.16 $254.24 $31,918.30 $254,332.86 $1,309.51 $106.40 $48,731.97 $28,023.83 $46,745.81 $39,485.85 $7,785.61 $478.35 $24,980.71 $104.57 $97.20 $15,068.22 $8,675.89 $2,148.33 $566.92 $378.30 $548.30 $3,084.39 $272,031.68 $503,883.75 $144,320.31 $3,492.13 $22.82 $2,611. 27 $113,790.62 $172,390'.23 $205,558.92 $12,799.61 $113,472.65 $145,625.93 $348,398.41 $2,905.84 $186,010.15 $147,668.02 $3,055,835.12* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 54055 54056 54057 54058 54059 54060 54061 54062 54063 54064 54065 54066 54068 54069 54070 54071 54072 54073 54074 54075 54076 54077 54078 54083 54085 54086 54087 54088 54089 54090 54091 54092 54093 54094 54095 54096 54099 54100 54101 54102 54103 54104 54105 54107 54108 54109 54113 54114 54115 54116 54117 54118 54120 54121 54123 $39,344.71 $332.50 $68.26 $2,694.65 $180.56 $32.50 $485.64 $50.00 $130.00 $27.28 $545.60 $16,291.43 $3,097.32 $4,478.50 $92.90 $15.12 $29.99 $24.67 $1,846.75 $1,000.00 $66,218.07 $250.00 $1,483.30 $366.48 $105.00 $58.20 $1,365.67 $50.00 $229.86 $29.00 $27.00 $72.00 $14,043.50 $20.00 $2,196.07 $27,887.70 $1,896.98 $32.00 $37.40 $29.00 $5.00 $39.98 $36,965.22 $5.00 $5.00 $14,295.56 $1,311.15 $20.00 $500.00 $29.00 $29.00 $1,660.77 $22.37 $1,778.01 $325.35 VENDOR GRIGGS COOPER & CO BEAVER MOUNTAIN CAMAS-SHIELY DIVISION CAPITOL COMMUNlCATI·ONS CIRCUS PIZZA EDHOLM, SUE HOME DEPOT, THE INGRAHAM, ED INSTITUE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT MICHAEL W JACQUES MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATI NORTHERN STATES POWER CO OFFICE DEPOT PARROTT CONTRACTING INC PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN JERRY PRODOEHL RITZ CAMERA US WEST COMMUNICATIONS WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT PRAIRIE VILLAGE LMTD PARTNERSH GREG RUSH GENUINE PARTS COMPANY PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS GASOLINE ALLEY PIZZA HUT BELLBOY CORPORATION BI PERFORMANCE SERVICES BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE JILL CLEVELAND CUTLER, KRISTIN DAHLEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY DAY DISTRIBUTING DECKER, JODI EAGLE WINE COMPANY EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY GRIGGS COOPER & CO HELEN GUNTHER HANSEN, RON HARSTAD, BETH HENNING, LAURIE JC PENNEY JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO KINGHORN, KATHY KROHN, SHIRLEY 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) DESCRIPTION MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE SPECIAL EVENTS FEES GRAVEL CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ROUND LAKE PAVILION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ROUND LAKE PAVILION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS MILEAGE AND PARKING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ELECTRIC OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POSTAGE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS VIDEO SUPPLIES TELEPHONE CREDIT UNION INTEREST SUBSIDY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EQUIPMENT PARTS VIDEO SUPPLIES SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS FEES MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE FACILITIES RENTAL CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND SKATING LESSONS BEER 6/12 BEER 6/12 RFND SWIM LESSONS MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE BEER 6/12 MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE LESSONS/CLASSES ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER RFND SWIM LESSONS RNFD STARGAZING CLOTHING & UNIFORMS MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE RFND STARGAZING RFND STARGAZING MARK VII BEER 6/12 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE MINNESOTA PRIMA MN MINE ALLIANCE NELSON, JON PAM NOLAN NORTH STAR ICE OLSON, HEATHER PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY PEPSI COLA COMPANY DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND SWIM LESSONS MISC TAXABLE RFND SWIM LESSONS BEER CASES MISC TAXABLE PROGRAM PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS STREET MAINTENANCE HIDDEN PONDS RES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS SPECIAL EVENTS 1995 REHAB 56042 SPECIAL EVENTS FINANCE DEPT PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 ADULT PROGRAM SEWER LIFTSTATION GENERAL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES FIRE FD 10 ORG TIF PV & ELIM SUMMER SAFETY CAMP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM FIRE STATION #1 POOL LESSONS ICE ARENA PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 POOL LESSONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 POOL LESSONS WATER DEPT POOL LESSONS OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POLICE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 HUMAN RESOURCES STARING LAKE CONCERT POOL LESSONS OAK POINT LESSONS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 OAK POINT LESSONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-~997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM ------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 54~24 54~25 54~26 54~28 54~29 54130 54~3~ 54~33 54~34 5U35 54136 54~37 54~38 54~39 54~40 54~4~ 54142 54~43 54~44 54~45 54~46 54~47 54~48 54~49 54~50 5U5~ 54~52 54~53 5U54 54~57 54~58 54~59 54~60 54~6~ 54~62 54~63 54~64 54~65 54~67 54~68 54~69 54~70 54~71 54~72 54~ 73 54~74 54~75 54~76 54~77 54~78 54~79 54~80 54~8~ 54~82 54~83 $~5.25 $~94.80 $23,602.08 $23.00 $6,391.79 $7.87 $~2,52~.9~ $350.00 $~8.50 $3.62 $32.00 $29.00 $87.00 $~8.49 $300.00 $35,928.85 $~45.00 $5.00 $22.37 $274.74 $262.64 $50.00 $50.00 $2~1.50 $359,275.50 $50.00 $50.00 $~O.OO $~,~38.~5 $2,808.~7 $114,402.30 $~05.00 $455.57 $~69.20 $~4.2~ $60.00 $857.00 $~53.76 $664.07 $67.H $5,881.46 $348.3~ $5,~67.00 $55.00 $642.00 $~85.00 $2,980.50 $35.00 $82.00 $46,390.~8 $HO.OO $3,~43.82 $~89.60 $200.00 $7,220.50 PETTY CASH PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC PHO, KAY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PUROHIT, NANDA QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO RATTLETRAP RECORDINGS CITY OF RICHFIELD RIEDER, LUANN ROTS CHAFER , LINDA SCHMIDTKE, CATHY SEVERSON, SUZANNE SNYDER DRUG SPEBSQSA INC THORPE DISTRIBUTING TERRI TOMLINSON URKE, BRENDA WELT IN , TINA THE WINE COMPANY WORLD CLASS WINES INC ARCADIA FINANCIAL LTD BENAFIT STRATEGIES INC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC GE CAPITAL KAMPEN, ROBIN MCDONALDS MERLINS ACE HARDWARE MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER MTI DISTRIBUTING CO PETERS, GERRY SANITARY SUPPLY INC JACK SCHEPERS AIRTOUCH CELLULAR BCA/TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE CLIFF CRACAUER HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND HENNEPIN COUNTY I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUCT-457 J H LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY JASON-NORTHCO L.P. #~ MCPA MINN STATE RETIREMENT SYS MINNESOTA CLE MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI JAMES MORROW PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS SOUTHWEST LAWN MAINTENANCE INC UNITED WAY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES BEER 6/~2 MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE RFND SWIM LESSONS WINE IMPORTED RFND SWIM LESSONS MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RFND SWIM CLASS RFND WATER SAFETY AIDE RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND SWIM LESSONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES BEER 6/~2 RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND STARGAZING RFND SWIM LESSONS WINE IMPORTED WINE IMPORTED HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL ROUND LAKE PAVILION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTEREST STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL HOMEWARD HILLS BLDG RENTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL BLDG SURCHARGES MACHINERY EQUIPMENT RFND ICE TIME BUILDING MILEAGE AND PARKING OTHER EQUIPMENT SCHOOLS GARNISHMENT WITHHELD MILEAGE AND PARKING GARNISHMENT WITHHELD WASTE DISPOSAL DEFERRED COMP REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SCHOOLS DEFERRED COMP SCHOOLS DEFERRED COMP CREDIT UNION SCHOOLS PERA WITHHELD PERA WITHHELD CITY CENTER GROUNDS MNTC UNITED WAY WITHHELD BOND DEDUCTION DEFERRED COMP EPCC MAINTENANCE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #~ PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #~ POOL LESSONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #~ OAK POINT LESSONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #~ STARING LAKE CONCERT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POOL LESSONS POOL LESSONS POOL LESSONS POOL LESSONS ROUND LAKE-BEACH STARING LAKE CONCERT PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #~ POOL LESSONS OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POOL LESSONS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 SPECIAL EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS HUMAN RESOURCES CITY CENTER DEBT FD SPECIAL EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING SURCHARGE P/R REVOLVING FD ICE ARENA CC CAPITAL OUTLAY PRAlRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 RECREATION ADMIN POLICE FD ~O ORG EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FD ~O ORG PARK MAINTENANCE FD ~O ORG EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #~ POLICE FD 10 ORG POLICE FD ~O ORG FD ~O ORG POLICE FD ~O ORG FD 10 ORG EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS FD ~O ORG FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5418.4 54185 54186 54187 54188 54189 54190 54191 54192 54193 54194 54195 54196 54197 54199 54200 54201 54203 54204 54205 54206 54207 54208 54209 54210 54211 54212 54213 54214 54216 54217 54219 54220 54221 54222 54223 54224 54225 54227 54228 54229 54230 54231 54232 54233 54234 54235 54236 54237 54238 54239 54240 54241 54242 54243 $256.00 $208.00 $26.00 $18.12 $160.00 $323.88 $26.00 $239.15 $22.38 $58.00 $47.86 $29.00 $44.74 $193.49 $26.00 $41.51 $531.09 $237.33 $29.00 $3,362.73 $54.70 $48.00 $170.00 $91.00 $840.00 $564.00 $287.43 $10.00 $1,324.30 $4,368.13 $751.17 $6,369.00 $24.92 $8.00 $95,931.00 $2,525.50 $14,295.00 $5,119.00 $25.00 $20.00 $724.80 $156.00 $21.00 $42.00 $42.00 $29.84 $5.00 $9,356.13 $1,173.02 $42.00 $618.00 $31,550.78 $33.00 $23.00 $27.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING BCA CJIS ID UNIT ANNE BYRNE NANCY CHAMBLIN COSTIGAN, ANDREW CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE DIERAUER, NANCY LYNDELL F FREY JAN GLENN HILLIGOSS, MARIE JULIE HOEFT JOHNSON, VICKY KLUKAS, ANN BILL LEMPESIS JOAN LIND ROD MACRAE MCGLYNN BAKERIES MENARDS MICHELLETTE, BRIDGET MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER PAPER WAREHOUSE SAWYER, DEON SHIPP, ROGER STANLEY, LESTER JIM STUKEL VALLEYFAIR VANDENBERGHE, MARK CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE AIRTOUCH CELLULAR BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY LILLEJORD, DEL METROPOLITIAN COUNCIL WASTEWAT MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER NORWEST BANK MN N. A. NSP PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ROBICHONS THE IN-LINE SKATE SC ANDERSON, MARK BARBER, BLANCHE BYRNE, BARBARA COX, LEAH DACUT, MEG DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICES EAGLE WINE COMPANY FOSS, JON GEISER, SUSAN GRAPE BEGINNINGS GRIGGS COOPER & CO HERRMANN, RUTH ILANGARATNE, CHRIS PEGGY INGBER SPECIAL EVENTS FEES PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND LIFEGUARD TRAINING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RFND SWIM LESSONS MILEAGE AND PARKING RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND SWIM LESSONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RFND SWIM LESSONS RFND SWIM LESSONS MILEAGE AND PARKING RFND SWIM LESSONS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES TRAVEL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RFND SWIM LESSONS BLDG SURCHARGES EMPLOYEE AWARD SPECIAL EVENTS FEES RFND ADULT RIVER TRIP RNFD COMMUNITY FIRST AID SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS FEES MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT GARNISHMENT WITHHELD TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES RFND DEFENSIVE DRIVING SYSTEM ACCESS-SEWER BLDG SURCHARGES INTEREST OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES RL MARINA CHG PETTY CASH INSTRUCTOR SERVICE RFND BRYANT LAKE CAMP RFND YOUTH TENNIS RFND SOCCER CAMP RFND SOCCER CAMP RFND AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL BEER CASES DEPOSITS RFND YOUTH SOCCER WINE DOMESTIC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE RFND AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND RFND SPORTS FUN & FITNESS RFND SAFETY CAMP SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM HUMAN RESOURCES POOL LESSONS OAK POINT LESSONS POOL LESSONS FIRE POOL LESSONS PROGRAM SUPERVISOR POOL LESSONS POOL LESSONS POOL SPECIAL EVENTS POOL LESSONS POOL LESSONS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 POOL LESSONS OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM HUMAN RESOURCES TRAFFIC SIGNS OAK POINT LESSONS BUILDING SURCHARGE HUMAN RESOURCES TEEN WORK PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POOL LESSONS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS TEEN WORK PROGRAM FIRE FD 10 ORG SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL PAVEMENT MGMT PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM SEWER DEPT BUILDING SURCHARGE CERTIF FUND PAYMENTS 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP DAY CAMP YOUTH TENNIS YOUTH ATHLETICS YOUTH ATHLETICS AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS ESCROW YOUTH ATHLETICS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND ADAPTIVE RECREATION SUMMER SAFETY CAMP COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 5424.4 54245 54246 54247 54248 54249 54250 54254 54255 54256 54257 54258 54259 54260 5426~ 54262 54263 54264 54265 54266 54267 54268 54269 54270 54271 54272 54273 54274 54275 54276 54277 54278 54279 54280 5428~ 54282 54283 54284 54285 54286 54287 54288 54289 54290 5429~ 54292 54293 54294 54295 54296 54297 54298 54299 54300 5430~ $40.00 $33,696.80 $48.00 $113.58 $30.00 $45.47 $75,491.24 $765.72 $320.00 $2,653.64 $6~.02 $52.00 $25,209.69 $3,~83.97 $~6, 061.4~ $27.40 $148.00 $37.00 $37.00 $78.00 $1,939.73 $4,159.59 $15.00 $15.63 $21. 88 $44.20 $8.75 $29.00 $160.00 $56.25 $45.00 $23.25 $26.00 $~5.00 $20.00 $85.00 $47.00 $52.50 $33.75 $49.00 $26.25 $25.00 $41. 25 $25.00 $483.10 $85.00 $525.00 $26.25 $36.00 $39.38 $20.56 $15.00 $28.13 $30.00 $45.00 VENDOR JABER, TAUT JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO KRASS, MARILYN LETO, LISA MATTSON, TERRI MCALLISTER, DEBRA NORTHERN STATES POWER CO OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CO INC RONALD G OTTERNESS PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY PEIXOTO, LINDA PHILLIPI, JOHN PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC PRIOR WINE COMPANY QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO PETER RIBOTTO SCHNEIDER, BARBARA VANDELAARSCHOT, PAULA WACKER, AMY WEHRS, BOBBI THE WINE COMPANY WORLD CLASS WINES INC GARY ALEXANDER ANDERSON, KRIS BENSON, ASHLEY LUCAS BEYER BORMAN, NIKKI BYRO, PATRICIA DAWN CARDARELLE CARLETON, ANDREW CHANEN, MICHAEL CORNER MARKING CO THOMAS CRAMPTON CRAWFORD, LORI DEGONDA, PAUL SANDY DUFFY DUVALL, EMILY ELFSTROM, JOJO MATTHEW FRANK GALDA, LINDSEY GERHARDT, MICHAEL GRAY, AARON HAHN, DREW HARER, ANDREW JEAN L HARRIS HARSTAD, BRYAN GLEN HELGESON GEOFF HOLTGREWE HORSCH, CARL JACOBSEN, KRISTEN JACOBSON, CHRIS JAEGER, MATT JOHNSTONE, MARJI ADAM JUSTIC KIMITCH, MIYEKO 29-JUL-~997 (08:02) DESCRIPTION RFND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE RFND AFTERNOON ADVENTURE MILEAGE AND PARKING RFND SAFETY CAMP RFND AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND ELECTRIC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSTRUCTOR SERVICE BEER CASES RFND GYMNASTICS RFND BEAVER MOUNTAIN MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE WINE IMPORTED MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE TRAVEL RFND ACTIVITY CAMP RFND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND RFND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND RFND ARTS CAMP BEER CASES WINE IMPORTED RFND YOUTH SNOKELING WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS RFND SWIM LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS OFFICE SUPPLIES WAGES NO BENEFITS RFND YOUTH SNORKELING RFND CANOEING KETTLE RIVER RFND ADULT RIVER TRIP RFND BASICS OF SAILING WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS TRAVEL RFND ADULT RIVER TRIP OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WAGES NO BENEFITS RFND PRIVATE SWIM LESSONS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS PROGRAM PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS AFTERNOON ADVENTURE ADAPTIVE RECREATION SUMMER SAFETY CAMP AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND STORMWATER LIFTSTATION PARK MAINTENANCE TEEN WORK PROGRAM LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS FINANCE DEPT ACTIVITY CAMP PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND ARTS CAMP LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS POOL LESSONS TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM OAK POINT LESSONS ACCESSIBILITY TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM POLICE TEEN WORK PROGRAM POOL LESSONS OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM POOL LESSONS TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM ACTIVITY CAMP TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM IN SERVICE TRAINING OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM STARING LAKE CONCERT TEEN WORK PROGRAM POOL LESSONS TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION 54302 54303 54304 54305 54306 54307 54308 54309 54310 54311 54312 54313 54314 54315 54316 54317 54318 54319 54320 54321 54322 54323 54324 54325 54326 54327 54328 54329 54330 54331 54332 54333 54334 54335 54336 54337 54338 54339 54340 54341 54342 54343 54344 54345 54346 54347 54348 54349 54350 54351 54352 54353 54354 54355 54356 $7.50 $17.00 $18.50 $37.50 $56.25 $22.37 $775.00 $52.50 $108.60 $35.00 $23.13 $626.86 $450.00 $17.50 $24.38 $30.63 $17.50 $250.00 $11.50 $39.38 $24.06 $46.19 $30.00 $23.44 $20,222.22 $192.52 $16.00 $2,392.63 $867.00 $194.62 $262.19 $8.50 $250,000.00 $91. 70 $200.00 $17.00 $7,772.67 $22.97 $664.07 $5,496.46 $1,403.00 $27.00 $249.21 $30.00 $717.00 $3,234.93 $7,785.46 $35.00 $100.00 $195.00 $80.00 $139.88 KOTTKE, JASMINE KROHN, SHIRLEY LEDIN, KARl LUS IAN , WALLY MEAD, BRENT MURPHY, KATHY BETH NILSSON O'BRIEN, PAT PETSMART PLOSZAY, ANDREA REESE, COREY RICOH CORPORATION ROBERT LINDAHL REALTY INC ROTS CHAFER , LAURA SALENGER, SETH SCHIMKE, DERRICK SCHMIDT, ELLY SIMONET, LORETTA SIPPRELL, STEPHANIE STEINKOPF, BRENT SVENDSEN, BRITT WALLER, MATT WOOD, MATT ZENT, ERIC ASPEN REACH EQUIPMENT COMPANY AT&T BOYINGTON, ROBERT CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE JOHN CONLEY CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS DRISKILLS NEW MARKET EDEN PRAIRIE VOLUNTEER FIRE RE CHRIS ENGER FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY HANSON, BECKI HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT TRUCT-457 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI ADELE KRANTZ BOB LAMBERT TAMMY LOFRANO MINN STATE RETIREMENT SYS MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI MOON VALLEY RANGE NWTA JR TEAM TENNIS TOURNEY NWTA JR TEAM TENNIS TOURNEY OTTERNESS, RON WAGES NO BENEFITS RFND YOUTH SAILING RFND SKATE LESSONS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS RFND SWIM LESSONS INSTRUCTOR SERVICE WAGES NO BENEFITS CANINE SUPPLIES WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS RENTALS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES RFND SWIM LESSONS WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS MILEAGE AND PARKING WAGES NO BENEFITS WAGES NO BENEFITS AUTOS TELEPHONE RFND 55 ALIVE DISABILITY IN EMPLOYERS GARNISHMENT WITHHELD SCHOOLS TRAINING SUPPLIES MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PENSION PLANS OFFICE SUPPLIES BOND DEDUCTION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL DEFERRED COMP OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GARNISHMENT WITHHELD DEFERRED COMP UNION DUES WITHHELD RFND BACHMANS COMO CONSERVE TRAVEL SCHOOLS DEFERRED COMP DEFERRED COMP BLDG SURCHARGES CREDIT UNION RENTALS REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL $4,074.15 PRUDENTIAL INS CO OF AMERlCA-C LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYERS $52,353.34 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA WITHHELD $285.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT LIFE INSURANCE W/H 1 PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM POOL LESSONS ICE ARENA TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM OAK POINT LESSONS ICE ARENA TEEN WORK PROGRAM POLICE TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM GENERAL STARING LAKE CONCERT TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM STARING LAKE CONCERT POOL LESSONS TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM HUMAN RESOURCES TEEN WORK PROGRAM TEEN WORK PROGRAM P/R REVOLVING FD GENERAL SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG POLICE HUMAN RESOURCES CONCESSIONS FIRE IN SERVICE TRAINING FD 10 ORG FINANCE DEPT FD 10 ORG SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG ADULT PROGRAM IN SERVICE TRAINING FITNESS CLASSES FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG BUILDING SURCHARGE FD 10 ORG POLICE YOUTH TENNIS YOUTH TENNIS TEEN WORK PROGRAM FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG FD 10 ORG COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 54357 54358 54359 54360 54361 54362 54363 54364 54365 54366 54367 54368 54369 54370 54371 54372 54373 54374 54375 54376 54377 54378 54379 54380 54381 54382 54383 54384 54385 54386 54387 54388 54389 54390 54391 54392 54393 54394 54395 54396 54397 54398 54400 54401 54402 54403 54404 54405 54406 54407 54408 54409 54410 54411 54412 $26.00 $19.80 $75.00 $l3,017.50 $159.60 $168,730.15 $110.00 $10,883.32 $24.00 $52.00 $120.00 $3,779.55 $17,099.98 $198.00 $34,439.65 $170.00 $26.00 $152.00 $78.00 $25.00 $18,175.67 $21.00 $82.50 $42.00 $577.05 $23.00 $7,913.02 $26.00 $107.16 $454.11 $289.10 $91.38 $59.94 $86.00 $54.00 $42.00 $582.94 $100.00 $59.98 $52.00 $23.00 $225.00 $1,141.61 $3,194.25 $88.00 $145.00 $32.00 $75.00 $16.38 $78.00 $36.67 $26.00 $200.00 $32.00 $129,238.25 VENDOR CITY OF RICHFIELD SCHULER, JENN PAM SCHWEITZER TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO UNITED WAY MAUN & SIMON PLC MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER BCA CJIS ID UNIT BROWN, PATRICIA CARDINAL CREEK DAHLEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY DAY DISTRIBUTING DEM CON LANDFILL INC EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY ROBERT HANSON-EMERSON KARSH, JANE KLOECKNER, LINDA JOAN LIND LYRIC THEATRE MARK VII JODY MEYER MEYER, NICOLE 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) DESCRIPTION AUTOS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSTRUCTOR SERVICE MACHINERY EQUIPMENT UNITED WAY WITHHELD PIPER STARKEY LAB STATE BERTH FEE MAY BLDG SURCHARGES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RFND ADULT GOLF STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL BEER 6/12 BEER 6/12 LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL BEER 6/12 RFND ACTIVITY CAMP RFND MINIATURE GOLF RFND ACTIVITY CAMP RFND BRYANT LAKE CAMP SPECIAL EVENTS FEES BEER 6/12 RFND MINIATURE GOLF OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MEYERS, LINDA RFND SOCCER FUN CAMP MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER NEMER, JULIE OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CO INC OPM INFO SYSTEMS, BRAD STARR PEPSI COLA COMPANY PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PIZZA HUT DEBBIE PLAGER REBS MARKETING S & W PLASTICS/BRENT DZIVK JAMES C SCHEDIN SEO, ROBERT STATE TREASURER STATE OF MN STENSGAARD, STEVE US POSTMASTER US WEST COMMUNICATIONS WENDORFF, BARB ARMSTRONG, NANCY BERTELSON, ANN CODY, ELAINE CROWN MARKING INC DAVIS, MARY DECHERY, LAURIE DENNY, BRIDGET JANET DUBOIS DYLLA, ROBIN FIRST TRUST NATL ASSOC LICENSES & TAXES BLDG SURCHARGES RFND MINIATURE GOLF EQUIPMENT PARTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT MISC TAXABLE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SPECIAL EVENTS FEES RFND YOUTH SOCCER FUN CAMP OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL CLOTHING & UNIFORMS RFND MINIATURE GOLF LICENSES & TAXES AWARDS POSTAGE TELEPHONE RFND ACTIVITY CAMP RFND ACTIVITY CAMP RFND JR GOLF RFND ARTS CAMP OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RFND SPORTS CAMP RFND TENNIS RFND MINIATURE GOLF INSTRUCTOR SERVICE RFND JUNIOR GOLF PRINCIPAL PROGRAM P/R REVOLVING FD ARTS CAMP OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM P/W REVOLVING FUND FD 10 ORG ESCROW ESCROW BUILDING SURCHARGE FINANCE DEPT SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP SPECIAL EVENTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 RILEY LAKE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 ACTIVITY CAMP SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS ACTIVITY CAMP DAY CAMP ADULT PROGRAM PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS YOUTH ATHLETICS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 WATER UTILITY-GENERAL BUILDING SURCHARGE SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 ADAPTIVE RECREATION SUMMER SAFETY CAMP AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND TEEN WORK PROGRAM YOUTH ATHLETICS WATER ACCOUNTING SPECIAL EVENTS POLICE SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL HORSESHOES WATER ACCOUNTING SEWER LIFTSTATION ACTIVITY CAMP ACTIVITY CAMP SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP ARTS CAMP PARK MAINTENANCE SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP HRA 2ND SHEET ICE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT 54413 54414 54416 54417 54418 54419 54420 54421 54422 54423 54424 54425 54426 54427 54428 54429 54430 54431 54432 54433 54435 54436 54437 54438 54439 54440 54441 54442 54443 54444 54445 54446 54447 54448 54449 54451 54452 54453 54454 54455 54456 54457 54458 54459 54460 54461 54462 54463 54464 54466 54467 54468 54472 54473 54474 $31. 50 $1,055.99 $26.00 $78.00 $26.95 $24.00 $100.00 $30.00 $42.00 $104.00 $194.45 $74.00 $50.00 $495.00 $26.00 $42.00 $20.00 $90.00 $78.00 $86.00 $21,112.20 $52.00 $21.00 $124.00 $800.00 $88.00 $607.08 $23.95 $125.00 $186.54 $2,065.95 $997.03 $720.00 $126.22 $210.82 $275.00 $251.76 $859.94 $316.92 $67.00 $14,170.00 $172.58 $2,732.48 $69.07 $5,127.63 $1,314.16 $206.24 $1,530.72 $3,209.28 $670.95 $285.00 $7,022.78 $143.90 $50,690.73 $652.07 VENDOR LYNDELL F FREY G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL JANE GUERTIN HECKMANN, BETH HELLING, TERRI HOCH, MARY LEE PREETI JAIN JOHNSON, SUSAN KEMPSTON, LISA KNOEDLER, SHEILA BOB LAMBERT MARTENS, LESLIE MOHN, ASTRID NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES PERKINS, JUDY DIXIE QUINN SCHULTZ, KATHRYN PAM SCHWEITZER CINDY SMITH SULLIVAN, JACKIE THORPE DISTRIBUTING ROSETTI VAASSEN WALTERS, SANDRA SETH WEBSTER WEST SUBURBAN COLUMBUS CREDIT KATHY WIRBISKY A TO Z RENTAL CENTER AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT AAHPERD ACTION THREADED PRODUCTS ADVERTISING INCENTIVES AEC ENGINEERING ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY COMPANY AMERICAN PAGING OF MN AMERICAN PLUMBING ANDON 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) DESCRIPTION TRANSPORTATION CLOTHING & UNIFORMS RFND MINIATURE GOLF RFND MINIATURE GOLF OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RFND TENNIS LESSONS RFND ACTIVITY CAMP RFND MINIATURE GOLF RFND YOUTH SOCCER FUN CAMP RFND JR GOLF WEEK LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL RFND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND RFND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND CONFERENCE RFND MINIATURE GOLF RFND SOCCER FUN CAMP RFND YOUTH TENNIS INSTRUCTOR SERVICE RFND BRYANT LAKE DAY CAMP RFND ACTIVITY CAMP BEER 6/12 RFND MINIATURE GOLF RFND MINIATURE GOLF MILEAGE AND PARKING CREDIT UNION RFND ACTIVITY CAMP EQUIPMENT RENTAL LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS DESIGN & CONST SOFTWARE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL APRES EQUIPMENT RENTAL AQUA ENGINEERING INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR ARBOURS GARDEN & FLORAL CENTER REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ARTHUR ANDERSON LLP ASPEN REACH EQUIPMENT COMPANY AVR INC B & STOOLS B&S INDUSTRIES INC BAILEY NURSERIES INC BAKERS RIBS BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY BELLBOY CORPORATION BENIEK LAWN SERVICE BFI TIRE RECYCLERS OF MN INC BIFFS INC BIG BOBS REPIR SHOP & SONS INC BLACK & VEATCH BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE DEPOSITS EQUIPMENT PARTS ASPHALT OVERLAY SMALL TOOLS POLICE EQUIPMENT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL TRAVEL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT TOBACCO PRODUCTS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WASTE DISPOSAL WASTE DISPOSAL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS OTHER EQUIPMENT PROGRAM SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS WATER TREATMENT PLANT SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS POOL SPECIAL EVENTS YOUTH TENNIS ACTIVITY CAMP SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS YOUTH ATHLETICS SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP PARK MAINTENANCE PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND IN SERVICE TRAINING SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS YOUTH ATHLETICS YOUTH TENNIS OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM DAY CAMP SPORTS/SPECIAL CAMPS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS TREE DISEASE FD 10 ORG ACTIVITY CAMP PARK MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE IN SERVICE TRAINING WATER TREATMENT PLANT PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 HIDDEN PONDS TOWER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PRAlRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 CITY MANAGER 1995 REHAB 56042 JULY 4TH CELEBRATION JULY 4TH CELEBRATION STARING LAKE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ESCROW EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE REFORESTATION WATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PARK MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE POLICE 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 54475 54476 54477 54478 54479 54480 54481 54482 54483 54484 54485 54486 54487 54488 54489 54490 54491 54492 54493 54494 54495 54496 54497 54498 54499 54500 54501 54502 54503 54504 54505 54506 54507 54508 54509 54511 54512 54513 54514 54515 54516 54517 54518 54519 54520 54521 54522 54523 54524 54525 54526 54527 54528 54529 54530 $257.81 $4,029.50 $13,732.49 $57.00 $655.00 $3,180.53 $717.50 $2,209.43 $1,000.00 $2,380.00 $380.00 $85.47 $2,260.00 $49.20 $313.00 $2,785.87 $15.00 $82.92 $111.79 $106.40 $76.36 $550.00 $1,647.17 $165.94 $4,500.00 $30.28 $18,259.31 $47.95 $573.95 $12,800.00 $325.00 $1,334.70 $625.21 $3,222.00 $436.56 $212.17 $166.74 $3,618.26 $14,405.58 $8,820.00 $32,666.75 $283.83 $5,226.00 $17,490.49 $198.00 $44.32 $798.75 $2,506.50 $18.00 $17.85 $1,552.00 $398.99 $100.00 $209.25 $75.00 BOYLE, KOREE BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION BROCK WHITE CO LLC BROWN'S ICE CREAM CO C-D PRODUCTS INC CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CARLSON COUNSELING AND CONSULT CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT CHAD NESTOR ILLUSTRATION & DES CITY OF BLOOMINGTON CITY OF EDINA CLAREYS INC CLOSED CIRCUIT SPECIALISTS INC CMI REFRIGERATION-PARTS COLLINS ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS INC COLUMBINE TOWNHOME LP COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I CONANT CONTROLS INC CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS COMPANY CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC CONTRACT HARDWARE CO INC COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOC COPY EQUIPMENT INC CORNERSTONE CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CY'S UNIFORMS DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEROMA, HERB DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DPC INDUSTRIES INC DRISKILLS NEW MARKET DYNA SYSTEMS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING SEAL COATING CONTRACTED MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE ADVERTISING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES KENNEL SERVICE CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PERMANENT TRANSFER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRINTING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL CHEMICALS CLOTHING & UNIFORMS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LICENSES & TAXES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CHEMICALS POLICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EARL F ANDERSON SIGNS EDEN PRAIRIE FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N BLDG RENTAL EIDE HELMEKE PLLP ELIM MANAGEMENT SERVICE ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC ERICKSEN ELLISON AND ASSOCIATE ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC EUGEN R ELLEFSON EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC EXPRESSO MIDWEST INC FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICE FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES OPER FEDEX FEED-RITE CONTROLS INC FIBRCOM FINANCIAL SERVICES, MOES FIRST MICRO GROUP INC FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY AUDIT & FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES DESIGN & CONST REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES POSTAGE FURNITURE & FIXTURES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POSTAGE CHEMICALS COMMUNICATIONS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT BOND ISSUE COSTS 10 SUMMER SAFETY CAMP WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE STREET MAINTENANCE ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS JULY 4TH CELEBRATION POLICE BENEFITS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARKS & REC MONTH ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS CONCESSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNALS COLUMBINE RD TIF PROJECT PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL POLICE PARKS-PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT STORM DRAINAGE RACQUETBALL FINANCE DEPT PARK MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES POLICE WATER TREATMENT PLANT POLICE FIRE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL SUMMER SAFETY CAMP AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND WATER TREATMENT PLANT POLICE WATER TREATMENT PLANT TRAFFIC SIGNS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUMMER THEATRE FINANCE DEPT TIF PV & ELIM WATER TREATMENT PLANT PARKS & REC MONTH STORM DRAINAGE SOFTBALL RECREATION ADMIN POLICE HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC FINANCE DEPT GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT POLICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FIRE B & I PAYMENTS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT $347.90 $9.00 $33.02 $447.09 $45.00 $660.82 $286.23 $842.30 $42.23 $82.82 $200.00 $681. 00 $1,638.13 $206.50 $353.20 $12.36 VENDOR FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY FRANKLIN COVEY G & K SERVICES DIRECT PURCHASE GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN GETTMAN COMPANY 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) DESCRIPTION OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CLOTHING & UNIFORMS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC TAXABLE GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS EMPLOYEE AWARD GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES GOAR, TERRY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES GOLD COUNTRY INC SIGNATURE CON CLOTHING & UNIFORMS GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC GRAFIX SHOPPE GRAND VIEW LODGE TIRES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES NEW CAR EQUIPMENT SCHOOLS 5453J. 54532 54533 54534 54535 54536 54537 54538 54539 54540 54541 54542 54543 54544 54545 54546 54547 54548 54549 54550 54551 54552 54553 54554 54555 54556 54557 54558 54559 54560 54561 54562 54563 54564 54565 54566 54567 54568 54569 54570 54571 54572 54573 54574 54575 54576 54577 54578 54579 54580 54581 54582 54583 54584 54585 $353.37 GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPT REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES $288.59 $125.92 $44.45 $955.00 $253.50 $102.00 $422.50 $1,780.00 $77.17 $616.73 $898.60 $1,765.47 $4,724.00 $720.24 $1,000.00 $177,230.16 $416.66 $198.27 $1,115.95 $1,422.84 $80.00 $100.00 $128.15 $867.00 $791.25 $261.15 $2,470.40 $129.34 $83.58 $1,150.00 $10,183.56 $355.91 $413.35 $3.80 $2,545.72 $260.43 $7,206.93 $10,973.73 GROVE NURSERY CENTER GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC HACH COMPANY HARMON AUTOGLASS HAWK LABELING SYSTEMS HCMC HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER HENNEPIN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY HIRSHFIELDS PAINT MANUFACTURIN HOME DEPOT, THE HORIZONGRAPHICS HUFFMAN, JIM HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS INC HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC INTERNATIONAL SUNPRINTS INC INTOXIMETERS INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE IPMA J & A HANDY-CRAFTS INC J A PRICE AGENCY INC JAMES BISSONETT & ASSOC INC JIM HATCH SALES CO KD KANOPY KELLY INN KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING KENNETH COMPANIES INC KODET ARCHITECTURAL GRP LTD KOENIG EQUIPMENT LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC LAGERQUIST CORP LAKE REGION VENDING LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES LAMETTRYS COLLISION LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT PARTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC WASTE DISPOSAL WASTE DISPOSAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRINTING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL AWARDS OTHER EQUIPMENT TRAVEL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSURANCE PRINTING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OTHER EQUIPMENT SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES DESIGN & CONST CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT TRAINING SUPPLIES CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR TOBACCO PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT LEGAL SERVICE Ii PROGRAM WATER TREATMENT PLANT PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 PARK MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE INFORMATION SYSTEM ICE ARENA WATER UTILITY-GENERAL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS HUMAN RESOURCES FITNESS CENTER ICE ARENA STREET MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE POOL LESSONS REFORESTATION TRAFFIC SIGNALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE BENEFITS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICE PARK MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE 1995 REHAB 56042 COMMUNITY SERVICES STORM DRAINAGE IN SERVICE TRAINING CUB FOOD STORE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL POLICE IN SERVICE TRAINING IN SERVICE TRAINING ACTIVITY CAMP PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 IN SERVICE TRAINING WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE SPECIAL EVENTS POLICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT PARK MAINTENANCE PW STORAGE FACILITY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES WATER TREATMENT PLANT PRAlRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 54586 54587 54588 54589 54590 54591 54592 54593 54594 54595 54596 54597 54598 54599 54600 54601 54602 54603 54604 54605 54606 54607 54608 54609 54610 54611 54612 54613 54614 54615 54616 54617 54618 54619 54620 54621 54622 54624 54625 54626 54627 54628 54629 54630 54631 54632 54633 54634 54635 54636 54637 54638 54639 54640 54641 $288.00 $1,155.00 $170.00 $413.54 $289.06 $73,642.97 $22.50 $15,884.50 $1,353.16 $1,429.70 $495.76 $32.93 $250.00 $750.00 $454.00 $167.04 $360.00 $227,393.00 $50.00 $643.47 $18,446.59 $643.85 $173.50 $45.46 $182.69 $792.15 $17.82 $60.00 $845.20 $300.85 $793.34 $1,022.29 $1,737.94 $554.00 $204.00 $154.00 $1,325.19 $985.02 $1,000.00 $420.00 $182.33 $498.46 $38.00 $1,181.63 $730.59 $588.87 $12.25 $51.50 $95.85 $300.01 $759.13 $409.80 $100.82 $1,414.56 $16.80 LEE BRANT LEE RAY LEONARD J KOEHNEN & ASSOC LESCO INC LEUER, MOEN LOGIS M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC MACDONALD PLUMBING CO MAGIC GLO MASYS CORPORATION MAXI-PRINT INC MCNEILUS STEEL INC MEALS ON WHEELS OF EDEN PRAIRI MEDICINE LAKE TOURS MEDTOX METRO SALES INCORPORATED METROPOLITAN AREA PROMOTIONS C METROPOLITIAN COUNCIL WASTEWAT MEYER, NICOLE MIDLAND EQUIPMENT COMPANY MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE CO MINNCOMM PAGING MINNESOTA CONWAY MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY MN ASSOC. OF SOIL & WATER CONS MOORE MEDICAL CORP MTI DISTRIBUTING CO MUNITECH INC NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE NCR CORPORATION NELSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS NORD, DOUG NORTH STAR ICE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CHEMICALS DEPOSITS LOGIS SERVICE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS BUILDING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONTRACTED COMM MAINT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS FEES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTING WASTE DISPOSAL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EQUIPMENT PARTS ASPHALT OVERLAY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT PARTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SAFETY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT OTHER EQUIPMENT EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES MISC TAXABLE NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT NRPA PUBLICATIONS CENTER OHLIN SALES OLSON CHAIN & CABLE CO INC ON BELAY OUTDOOR ADVENTURES OPM INFO SYSTEMS, BRAD STARR OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENTS INC PAPER DIRECT INC PARAGON CABLE PEPSI COLA COMPANY PHOTOS INC PIZZA HUT PORTOLITE PRODUCTS PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES OTHER EQUIPMENT INSTRUCTOR SERVICE COMPUTERS MOWING OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CABLE TV MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT PARTS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS WASTE DISPOSAL POSTAGE 12- SOFTBALL SOFTBALL POLICE PARK MAINTENANCE ESCROW WATER UTILITY-GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 CC CAPITAL OUTLAY TEEN WORK PROGRAM POLICE ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC ADULT PROGRAM HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL COMMUNITY SERVICES SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL ARTS CAMP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE CONCESSIONS EPCC MAINTENANCE SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT PLANT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE STORM DRAINAGE FIRE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE WATER METER REPAIR STREET MAINTENANCE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN CIVIL DEFENSE VOLLEYBALL LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE B & I PAYMENTS IN SERVICE TRAINING POLICE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM CITY MANAGER STREET MAINTENANCE YOUTH TENNIS COMMUNITY SERVICES ROUND LAKE CONCESSIONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUMMER SAFETY CAMP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EPCC MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EPCC MAINTENANCE GENERAL COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 54642 54643 54644 54645 54646 54647 54648 54649 54650 54651 54652 54653 54654 54655 54656 54657 54658 54659 54660 54661 54662 54663 54664 54665 54666 54667 54668 54669 54670 54671 54672 54673 54674 54675 54676 54677 54678 54679 54681 54682 54683 54684 54685 54686 54687 54688 54689 54690 54691 54692 54693 54694 54695 54696 54697 $36.76 $198.68 $40.82 $88.34 $175.00 $1,920.00 R AND R SPECIALITIES INC RAINBOW FOODS ROO EQUIPMENT CO RESPOND SYSTEMS RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS RETROFIT RECYCLING INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES TRAINING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WASTE DISPOSAL $17,563.57 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATE DESIGN & CONST $298.81 $12.40 $139.95 $990.00 $131.25 $106.47 $100.00 $191.17 RITZ CAMERA ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC ROGERS SERVICE CO ROY, BEN RUDE, MATT S & S WORLDWIDE S/K WELL & PUMP INSPECTIONS SALLY DISTRIBUTORS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EQUIPMENT PARTS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL $40.00 SCRANTON GILLETTE COMMUNlCATIO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $500.00 $76.80 $31.39 $1,142.50 $500.00 $743.85 $218.82 $565.00 $742.76 $1,957.01 $126.00 $49.31 $909.13 $49.64 $52.00 $50.00 $2,912.46 $1,250.62 $1,022.40 $19.07 $125.00 $3,276.18 $290.71 $119.17 $44.73 $7,036.76 $456.25 $815.00 $1,257.47 $54.64 $18,726.96 $56.32 $3.90 $107.45 $87.43 $124.80 $5,368.92 $731. 50 $15,975.00 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES INC SHARPS AWAY SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO SIERRA DIGITAL SINGLETON INTERNATIONAL SISINNI FOOD SERVICE SNAP-ON TOOLS SOFTDESK INC SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING SOVEREIGN, DAVE SPS COMPANIES ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY STAR TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE STATE OF MN -DEPT OF LABOR & STREICHERS SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I SUPERIOR PRODUCTS MFG CO SWEDLUNDS SYSTEM CONTROL SERVICES CORP TARGET THE BATTERY STORE INC THE W GORDAN SMITH COMPANY THE WORK CONNECTION TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TIM KOEPKE TNEMEC COMPANY INC TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY TOTAL REGISTER TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE TRANS UNION CORPORATION TRI TECH DISPENSING TRIARCO TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO UNIFORMS UNILIMITED UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC UNITED PROPERTIES BROKERAGE CO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS TRAINING SUPPLIES BUILDING MATERIALS COMPUTERS SCHOOLS MISCELLANEOUS SMALL TOOLS SOFTWARE REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ADVERTISING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC NON-TAXABLE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LICENSES & TAXES TRAINING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT PARTS TIRES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WASTE DISPOSAL CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES MOTOR FUELS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL OFFICE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES I~ ICE ARENA POOL OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OAK POINT OPERATIONS PW STORAGE FACILITY SW UTILITY STUDY PHASE II ENGINEERING DEPT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SOFTBALL AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND ACTIVITY CAMP WATER WELL #9 JULY 4TH CELEBRATION WATER UTILITY-GENERAL WATER METER REPAIR HUMAN RESOURCES RED ROCK PARK SPECIAL EVENTS POLICE IN SERVICE TRAINING PARK MAINTENANCE STORM DRAINAGE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE JULY 4TH CELEBRATION SOFTBALL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 FIRE WATER TREATMENT PLANT POLICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE WATER TREATMENT PLANT SUMMER SAFETY CAMP POLICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN FIRE WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE JULY 4TH CELEBRATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE CONCESSIONS ARTS CAMP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE BENEFITS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29-JUL-1997 (08:02) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 54698 $U6.64 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNS 54699 $60,864.88 US FILTER/WATERPRO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 54700 $5,386.24 VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 54701 $1,704.99 VESSCO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 54702 $181. 35 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 54703 $346.13 W E NEAL SLATE CO BUILDING MATERIALS ROUND LAKE 54704 $757.U W W GRAINGER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 54705 $292.00 WARNING LIGHTS OF MINNESOTA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 54706 $113.61 WASTE MANAGEMENT -SAVAGE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 54707 $709.75 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 54708 $150.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 54709 $646.58 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 54710 $395.00 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT TRAFFIC SIGNALS 54711 $1,565.63 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC GRAVEL WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 54712 $79.95 WORDPERFECT MAGAZINE CONTRACTED COMM MAINT POLICE 54713 $684.60 X-ERGON REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 54714 $3,343.32 YALE INCORPORATED CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 54715 $330.80 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND 54716 $300.12 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $3,055,835.12* EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 8-5-97 SECTION: APPOINTMENTS ITEM NO. xfl DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development APPOINTMENT TO FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT Chris Enger ADVISORY COMMISSION Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: Appoint a resident representative to the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission to complete an unexpired term which ends May 31, 1998. Background: Due to a transfer to Denver Colorado, Mr. Carlo Amato has resigned from the Flying Cloud Airport Advisory Commission. He was a resident representative to the Commission. Supporting Documents: 1. Resignation letter dated July 4, 1997 Carl 1. Jullie City Manager City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Dear Mr. Jullie: 7/4/97 As I hinted to Scott Kipp in May, the Amato family is planning to transfer to Denver on 7/29/97. Therefore, and with deep regret, I will resign my commission in the Hying Ooud Airport Advisory Commission effective on that date. During my short tenure, we have faced some very important issues relative to the expansion of the Airport. The many challenges relative to these issues have made a difficult job enjoyable. I am familiar with the problems associated with the replacement of resigning members, but I am sure enough citizens will step forward to volunteer for the appointment. I wish only the best to the Commission and I hope their work will be exactly what the Eden Prairie citizens have come to expect from them. Sincerely, Carlo B. Amato 13600 Carmody Dr. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Appointments August 5, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Appointment of 1 Represesntative to the x.8 Administration Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission BACKGROUND: David Kracum has moved out of Eden Prairie leaving a vacancy on the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission. REOUESTED ACTION: Appointment of 1 Representative to fill an unexpired term through March 31, 1998. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-30-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. XI B 1 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Admin -Carl Jullie Finance -Don Dram 1996 Financial Reports Requested Council Action: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the 1996 Financial Reports. Background: Minnesota statutes require that by June 30 of each year, the City prepare a financial report for activities of the previous year. This accounting report was forwarded to the State by that deadline. Preparation of the report is largely the work of the Finance Department. The report is prepared with review by the independent aUditing firm of Eide Helmeke PLLP. A representative of the auditing firm will make a presentation of the significant findings from the compilation of the financial report. In general, the City's fmancial conditions and practices are sound. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: Aug.S, 1997 Section: Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department: PRNR Recommendation on Consultant and Process to Item No.: Robert A. Lambe~or Develop a Management Plan for the Prairie Bluff -xl CI Conservation Area .;.--- RECOMM:ENDATION: City staff recommend that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the City Council approve the following process for developing a management plan for the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area: 1. Hire Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. to complete an inventory of the site and develop a management plan that would include a burn plan, interpretive trail plan, buffer plan and access control plan. 2. Form a committee of citizens interested in actively working on restoring the site, review the naturalist's recommendations and assist the City staff in various phases of management of the site, i.e., assisting in controlled burns, collecting seeds for reseeding prairies, organizing a park watch, leading interpretive trips, removing prickly ash, red cedar, etc. 3. Establish a budget and time line for completing the development of the site and initiating the management plan. BACKGROUND: The City has maintained a commitment to conserve its natural resources by preserving lakeshore, creek valleys, and bluff land. The Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan, updated in 1988, provided a framework for both active and passive recreation within the park system and included substantial parcels within conservation areas. In 1993, the City commissioned a natural resources survey that evaluated and ranked additional areas for acquisition by the City. A bond issue was passed by voters in 1994 that provided funding for acquisition of the Charlson property, now known as the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area, and the Riley Creek Woods. City staff desire assistance in establishing public policy related to management of the conservation areas. Staff have selected the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area as the fIrst site in which to develop a management plan. Management plans for other conservation areas will be developed over the next few years. The main purpose of the management plan is to determine how to preserve and enhance the natural resources that make this site valuable to the community. 1 ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED: The management plan should address the following issues: 1. How can the City best deal with invasive plants such as leafy spurge, prickly ash, and red cedar trees, as well as the need for regular burning? 2. How should public access be controlled? 3. Where should trails be allowed? Where should they not be allowed? How should they be constructed to cause the least damage to the slopes? 4. To what extent should edge definition be accomplished, both as the parcel currently exits, as well as with proposed new development on adjacent edges? 5. How can the parcel's fragile and sensitive qualities be maintained, if additional uses are allowed? 6. To what extent should actual facilities be constructed to accommodate natural resource interpretation, trail functions, scenic overlooks and other passive uses? 7. To what extent should the interpretive signage address the historical significance of the site? PROPOSED PROCESS TO DEVELOP MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRAIRIE BLUFF CONSERVATION AREA: City staff are recommending a process that includes involvement of a consulting naturalist and a limited group of citizens that would assist staff in developing a management plan for that site. Staff believes it is important that interested citizens become aware of how a management plan is developed for conservation areas, especially in conservation areas such as the Prairie Bluff site where there will be ongoing labor intensive management practices. It would be beneficial to involve citizens for several reasons: 1. Citizens have the opportunity to learn about management practices and how to preserve those resources. 2. Citizens have the opportunity to actually participate in those management practices such as collecting seeds for transplanting and over seeding prairie grasses and assisting in controlled burns. Both practices require many people to be successful. Other labor intensive tasks include removal of prickly ash and red cedar, invasive plat species that degrade the native prairie and oak savannah. 3. Involvement of citizens gives them an opportunity to take "ownership" of the various parcels, which will also help in the future when the City will need many people watching these large 2 parcels to reduce uses that may cause damage such as mountain bikes, motorized vehicles, unauthorized fIre, etc. City staff are recommending the City Council authorize appointment of an ad hoc committee to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission to work with a consulting naturalist and City staff on developing a management plan. Staff would then look to these committee members to form a nucleus of volunteers for the ongoing management tasks that will be necessary to successfully preserve and restore this site. Staff would suggest an article in the Eden Prairie News to invite residents to contact the Department of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources for volunteering to work on this committee. CONSULTANT PROPOSALS: City staff advertised for proposals from consulting naturalists to obtain quotations for development of a management plan for the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area. A copy of the Request for Proposal is attached to this memorandum. The City received four proposals with fees proposed as follows: • Peterson Environmental Consulting • Ingraham and Voss • Bonestoo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates • SRF Consulting Group $11,430 $11,460 $14,000 $25,233 Staff interviewed Peterson Environmental Consulting and Bonestoo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates based upon their competitive fees and the extensive background staff from both fIrms had doing similar projects. Staff are recommending Peterson Environmental Consulting at a fee not to exceed $11,430. Peterson Environmental is also in the process of completing the Wetland Inventory and the Storm Water Drainage Study for the City. They will have all the base maps for the City and will use G.P.S. to locate all of the significant pant communities and install that data in the base data for this site which will be monitored on a regular basis to determine improvement of the site. A summary of the proposal is attached to this memorandum. FUNDING SOURCE: The City Council authorized $20,000 for contracting park planning services in the 1997 budget. Staff recommend use of those budgeted funds for this project. BL:mdd Process2IBob97 3 6' REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT OF A MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRAIRIE BLUFF CONSERVATION AREA SECTION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. -OBJECTIVE The purpose of the Request for Proposal (RFP) is to obtain quotations for the development of a management plan of a 55 acre parcel of property owned by the City of Eden Prairie on . the Minnesota River Bluffs. This parcel of property contains approximately 11 acres of oak savannah and the remaining acreage is native prairie grasses. The City wishes to adopt a management plan that would ensure protection of the rare species of plant communities on this site. . The management plan should not only address the best methods for controlling alien weed species, etc. but also determine how the public will be able to utilize the site without destroying the resource. B. ISSUING OFFICE The RFP is issued by the City of Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department. All correspondence regarding this RFP must be addressed to: City of Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612-949-8440). C. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR Following signing of the contract, all communications concerning the contract must be directed to Robert A. Lambert, at 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. D. INCURRING COSTS The City of Eden Prairie is not liable for any cost incurred by the prospective ftrms prior to the signing of the contract. E. PROPOSALS To be considered, each firm must submit a complete response to this RFP, using the format provided in Section 3. The proposal must be signed in ink by an official authorized to bind the submitter to its provisions. The proposal must include a statement as to the period during which the proposal remains valid. This period must be a least sixty (60) days from the due date for this proposal. F. ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSAL CONTENT The contents of this proposal will become contractual obligations, if a contract ensues. Failure of the selected consultant to accept these obligations may result in cancellation of the award. G. SELECTION CRITERIA 1. Qualifications 2. Fee Proposal 3. Interview H. SEALED PROPOSAL RECEIPT Proposals must arrive at the Parks. Recreation and Natural Resources Department on or before 4:30 p.m., July 11, 1997. I. DISCLOSURE All information in the submitter's proposal, except the analysis. is subject to disclosure under the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 13 "Minnesota Government Data Practices Act." 1. RIGHT TO REJECT BIDS The City of Eden Prairie reserves the right to award the total proposal, to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part, and to waive any informality or technical defects, in City's judgement. the best jnterest of the City will be served. In determination of award. the qualification of the proposal submitter. the conformity with the specifications of services to be supplied and delivery terms will be considered. Selected individuals or firms will be given the opportunity to discuss. in more detail. their qualifications. past experience with similar public projects and their proposed time frame to accomplish the task. K. COST LIABILITY The City assumes no responsibility of liability for costs incurred by the firms prior to the signing of this agreement. Total liability of the City of Eden Prairie is limited to the terms and conditions of this agreement. SECTION II. WORK STATEMENT A. SUMMARYREPO'RT The consultant will be responsible for preparing a summary inventory of the site utilizing existing data already gathered on the site plus additional data gathered from an onsite inspection. B. FINAL REPORT The final report will include the following: 1. OVERVIEW A. Description of the Site B. Preservation Value C. Management Philosophy 2. GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS A. Management Resources B. Surveillance and Enforcement 3. STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES A. Access B. Parking C. Fencing and Gates D. Signing 4. MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL FEATURES A. Plant Community Management B. Natural Features, Surveying and Monitoring 5. ADJACENT LANDS 6. EFFECTS OF MANAGEMENT ON SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES 7. MANAGEMENT COSTS AND IMPLEMENTATION C. PROPOSED TIMETABLE 1. Proposal Submittal Deadline -Friday, July 11, 1997,4:30 p.m. 2. Interviews -Week of July 21, 1997. 3. Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources recommends consultant to Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission August 4, 1997 and to City Council-August 5, 1997. 4. Consultant receives project input from City staff and commences inventory analysis after contract approval -Week of August 11, 1997. 5. Consultant concludes reports and submits to the City of Eden Prairie -October 17, 1997. 6. Consultant reviews report with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission November 3, 1997 and with the City Council November 4, 1997. D. GENERAL COMMENTS RELATED TO SCOPE OF WORK 1. Public Meetin~s -The consultant will attend at least two meetings of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and one meeting of the City Council. These meetings will be at the request of the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources and at the beginning and at the end of the project, or may be at the end of the project with one additional meeting several months after the consultant has completed his project. When this information is combined with additional criteria used to evaluate these sites. Information review meetings with City staff will be ongoing for the duration of the project. Other meetings with various commissions or committees may be necessary, and the proposal should show the cost per hour of these meetings. SECTION III. INFORMATION REQUESTED FROM ALL PROPOSAL SUBMITTERS A. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 1. State the full name and address of the individual that will perform the work hereunder. 2. Manpower -Include the number of executive and professional personnel by skill and qualification that will be employed in the work. Show where these personnel will be physically located during the time they are engaged in the work. Indicate which of these individuals you consider key to the successful completion of the study or project. Identify individuals by name and title who will do the work on this project. Resumes or qualifications are required for proposed project personnel. 3. State history of the firm, in terms of length of existence, etc. B. PAST INVOLVEMENT WITH PROJECTS List specific types of experiences your firm has had in developing management plans for scientific natural areas, conservation areas, parks, or smaller projects C. FEE QUOTATION Cite your firm's not to exceed fee for this project, as well as your hourly fee for any services not included in this project. List the types of services not included by your not to exceed fee. Provide a statement indicating your ability to meet the proposed timetable. D. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATOR Include the name and phone number of the individual in your organization authorized to negotiate the proposed contract with the City of Eden Prairie. " E. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMENTS Include any other infonnation that is believed to be pertinent not specifically asked for elsewhere in this RFP. F. DEADLINE FOR SURMITTAL OF PROPOSAL One copy of the proposal must be received at the following address on or before 4:30 p.m., C.S.T., Friday, July 11, 1997. City of Eden Prairie Attn: Robert A. Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources .8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612-949-8440 Manage.rfplBob97 June 23, 1997 , 1 I -\ ' PETERSON E.-~VIRONMENTAL CQ,'~SULTING, INC. July 10, 1997 City of Eden Prairie Attn: Mr. Robert Lambert Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Subject: Proposal for the Development of a Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area PEC Proposal No. 80-264 Dear Mr. Lambert: Thank you for the oppotunity to submit this proposal for the development of a management plan for the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area for the City of Eden Prairie. We have read and will comply with all terms stated in the Request for Proposals. This proposal remains valid for 60 days from the date of submission. We very much look forward to the opportunity to discuss the proposal with you and with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions or if you need additional copies. Best regards, Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. ~ ROIlaidP:Pete so~ ........ President Enclosures: Proposal --One (1) Copy q ; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I EDEN PRAIRIE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PRAIRIE BLUFF CONSERVATION AREA PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE PETERSON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. A. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FIRM NAME AND ADDRESS: Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. (PEC) 1355 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 100 Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 COMPANY DESCRIPTION PEC is a Minnesota corporation, formed on September 23, 1992 and qualifies as a small business. PEC currently consists of seven full time, two part time, and six seasonal staff members with expertise in soils science, hydrology, geology, botany, wildlife biology, and environmental regulation. The firm specializes in: • • • • • Special biological studies (e.g. vegetation management plans, lake management studies, bird-aircraft hazard analysis) Threatened and endangered species surveys and Biological Assessments Comprehensive wetland-related services including delineation, inventories, permitting, mitigation design, ordinance development, hydrologic and soils studies, functions and values analysis, and management plans. Environmental review documents such as Environmental Impact Statements, Environmental Assessments, and Environmental Assessment Worksheets Expert witness services in natural resource related litigation 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTELE • Cities of Blaine, Ed~n Prairie, Eveleth, Fridley, Minneapolis, Mounds View, Owatonna, Plymouth, Shorewood, Virginia, and Woodbury • Metropolitan Airports Commission • Hennepin and Scott Counties • Numerous commercial, industrial and residential developers PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATIONAL CHART PROJECT TEAM WITH INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE PEC's Eden Prairie project team is outlined briefly below with a full resume' of each individual in the firm provided in the following section. Ronald P. Peterson, J.D., President of PEC, is a wildlife biologist and an attorney with over 16 years of professional experience varying from wetland work to wildlife habitat management. While a District Wildlife Biologist for the Kansas Fish and Game Commission, Mr. Peterson managed a 12,OOO-acre public wildlife area and was City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 2 1/ I I I I I ~ I • I ~ I responsible for planning and implementing prescribed burning operations on approximately 1,000 acres of restored tallgrass prairie. He has also prepared wildlife habitat and vegetation management plans for private lands in seven counties. Mr. Peterson will oversee project administration and will provide overall review and guidance on plan development. . Dr. James L. Arndt, Ph.D., Vice President of PEC, is a soil scientist with over 16 years of professional experience. Dr. Arndt provides a very broad range of services with PEC, including Geographic Information System (GIS) applications, field studies of wetland hydrology and hydric soils, threatened and endangered species, and other special wildlife, plant, and soil related studies. Dr. Arndt will provide technical guidance and oversee GPS and GIS applications. Recent projects include: Bill Bleckwenn,RL.A. is a registered landscape architect with over 9 years of professional experience including park planning and design, site planning, threatened and endangered species surveys, habitat assessment and restoration, and interpretive trail layout. Mr. Bleckwenn will manage the project with Ms. Desotelle, coordinate the field survey, provide expertise on plant community management methods, and develop the park schematic layout including parking, trails, etc. Crosby Farm Park Interpretive Trail -City of Saint Paul -Developed layout and interpretive facilities for trail, and management guidelines for wet meadow and floodplain forest habitats . Coon Rapids Dam Regional Trail (Phase 1)-Anoka County Parks -Project planner and landscape architect routing trail through steep erodible slopes, hardwood and floodplain forest, maintaining shallow grades to provide access and '. meet ADA requirements. Anoka County Trail Master Plan -Anoka County Parks -Project planner routing Coon Rapids Dam Regional Trail (Phase 2) through the cities of Fridley and Coon Rapids. Developed master plan document and drawings, and coordinated public meetings. Jason Husveth is a landscape architect-in-training with experience in native floristic surveys, wetland evaluation and delineation, biological monitoring of wetland systems, land use analysis, and the establishment and monitoring of long-term research plots. He has taught field identification of horticultural and native landscape plants and developed sustainable development guidelines of National Parks and gateway communities. Mr. Husveth will perform the field survey with Mr. Bleckwenn and establish sampling protocol methods. Scott A. Krych is a biologist and Certified Wetland Scientist with over 6 years of wetland delineation and inventory experience. Mr. Krych has extensive experience with . City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 3 • I~ surveys for threatened, endangered, and special concern species with particular emphasis on ornithological surveys. He has also conducted a survey in an oak -savanna community in association with a wetland pennit application adjacent to the site. Mr. Krych will be conduct plant and animal species surveys and habitat identification. Diane Desotelle, P.E. -Ms. Desotelle has over ten years experience managing a wide variety of projects in the field of water resources. They include water resource management planning, lake management plans, water resource education, hydrologiclhydrogeologic investigations and remediation, wetland inventories and administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. She was the Water Resources Coordinator for the City of Chanhassen from 1993 to 1995. Her experience managing the Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan in Chanhassen and the Wetland Inventory in Eden Prairie demonstrates her experience working with task forces and commissions on the local government level. Ms. Desotelle will manage the project with Mr. Bleckwenn, coordinate the public process and assist with the development of the management plan. Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan -City of Chanhassen - Coordination of the entire project including public process, plarming, project management, education, and writing of plan. The plan is based on ecosystem management philosophy; this involves the integration of scientific knowledge and human values toward the general goal of protecting the health of the ecosystem for generations to come. Darlene Dignen -Ms. Dignen is PEC's graphics and computer software technician. She is preparing the wetland inventory database on Microsoft Access and digitizing the City's wetlands over the 1994 USGS digital orthophotoquads (DOQs) on Arc View. This softWare is compatible with the City's recently acquired AutoCAD 14.0. Ms. Dignen will digitize the plant communities and provide the graphics for the project. Resume's Resume's of all project team members are attached as Appendix A. B. PAST INVOLVEMENT WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS Native Plant Community Evaluation for Natural Gas Pipeline Rights-of-Way in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota -Client Confidential. -Surveys of potential endangered and threatened plant and animal species along a natural gas pipeline rights-of-way in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, and North Dakota. Prairie, wetland, and hardwood forest habitats have been reviewed for the presence of protected species, and potential habitat areas for these species. Native prairie remnants are being evaluated for City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 4 ecological integrity, floristic diversity and presence/absence of threatened or endangered plant species. EPA Calcareous Fen Guidance Document -United States Environmental Protection Agency -Preparation of an informational document and management guide for calcareous fens in northeastern South Dakota for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (on-going project awarded as a competitive grant). Includes the evaluation of landform morphology, geochemistry, soils and vegetation of calcareous fens in Duell County South Dakota. . Dual Track Airport Planning Process -Metropolitan Airports Commission -PEe has been retained by the Metropolitan Airports Commission to. prepare the wetland, threatened and endangered species, biotic communities and bird-aircraft hazard elements of all environmental review documents for the Dual Track Airport Planning Study. This project involves environmental impact analysis relating to the above listed issues for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and potential airport sites within the Dakota County airport search area identified by the Minnesota Legislature. Delineation and Floristic Investigation of a Calcareous Fen and a Tall Grass Prairie Remnant -Natural Resource Group, Inc. -Delineated and conducted a floristic characterization of a calcareous fen and a tall grass prairie remnant along a pipeline right- of-way in Kendall County, Illinois. Evaluation of Known and Proposed Calcareous Fens in the Vicinity of the Burr Well Field -Lincoln Pipestone Rural Water District (LPRW) -Evaluated the landform morphology, geochemistry, soils and vegetation of the Sioux Nation fen and the proposed Livermore, Cleveland and Fairchild fens in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota. Prepared recommendations for additional research as well as a preliminary management plan outline. Comprehensive Wetland Inventory and Management Plan -City of Eden Prairie - PEC is in the process of completing the wetland inventory and wetland management plan for the City of Eden Prairie. PEC is working with Montgomery Watson, water resource engineers, to assess the City's functions and values, identify restoration potentials. and protect and preserve wetlands through watershed management. Comprehensive Wetland Inventory and Ordinance Development -City of Plymouth - PEC developed the City of Plymouth's wetland inventory and functions and values analysis. The inventory provided the basis for a new city wetland protection ordinance. City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 5 lif C. FEE QUOTATION Task Task Peterson Desotelle Bleckwenn Husveth Technicall No. Description Arndt Krych Clerical 1 Broad 8 8 Inventory 2 Releve . 16 24 Methodology 3 2 Task Force 16 12 Mtgs & Prep 4 Draft Plan 3 5 10 15 8 5 Final Plan 2 5 10 4 6 1 Commission 4 4 and 1 City Council Mtg Total 9 26 60 47 12 hours Cost $945 $2,210 $4,800 $2,585 $540 Total $11,430 Each invoice will be accompanied by a project summary indicating amount billed to date, tasks remaining to be completed, estimated cost of tasks to be completed and projected timeline. D. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATOR The authorized negotiator of the project contract will be Mr. Ronald Peterson, President ofPEC. E. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMENTS PROJECT APPROACH PEC's approach to the development of a management plan for the Prairie Bluff site will respond to information obtained during the site survey 'and from public input received from a task force, City staff and the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. A schematic plan will be designed after a thorough site review and public input process are completed. This approach provides an opportunity to incorporate site- City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 6 Ii) Expenses ($) 25 25 50 100 100 50 350 $350 specific concerns into the plan that will optimally manage a particular species, community, or the entire site. The City can prioritize site concerns as it desires and the management plan will reflect these goals. PEC will also provide assistance in establishing these priorities, as requested by the City. Specific tasks are as follows: Preparation for Site Survey PEC will review existing information on the site including the report titled Natural Community Survey that was prepared for the City of Eden Prairie in May 1993 by Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. in association with Lee Frelich. PEC has also coordinated with Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program staff who have reviewed the site in the past. A base map of the site will be prepared using the 1994 USGS digital orthophoto quadrangle maps (DOQs). This map will be compatible with AutoCAD 14.0 and AutoCAD MAP, the City'S preferred GIS software. Site Survey A general survey of the site will be conducted during August 1997. The site will be reviewed for plant community types and plant species. Particular attention will be given to the following: • Threatened, endangered, or special concern species as listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; • Invasive non-native species locations and densities; and • Location of areas that best represent each plant community type. Habitat assessment information will be entered into a GIS format that will enable sensitive species locations, invasive species locations, and community boundaries to be documented and used as a database to compare with future data retrieved from site monitoring activities. This will be done for each of the community types present: oak. savanna, mesic prairie, and xeric prairie. Locational information and plant community boundaries will be delineated using Global Positioning System (GPS) units for subsequent overlay on the DOQ base map and entry into the city's GIS. Input from the task force will be used to establish areas for more detailed inventory work. These areas will be sampled using the releve' technique used by the Department of Natural Resources as it conducts popUlation studies. This method is set forth in detail in The Releve' Method of Vegetation Sampling (J.C. Almendinger and E.C. Grimm. 1987. Workshop/Conference for Biology Laboratory Education. University of Minnesota). The releve' technique is recommended since the information will provide a baseline to assess future changes in species composition within the plot locations. The initial plot City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 7 If, I \ survey would be conducted during August or September 1997 upon receIvmg authorization from the City. The comers of these areas can be permanently marked at City direction to assist in plot surveys as part of a future monitoring program. Task Force Meetings Management of a public park with native plant communities must consider issues such as; (1) vehicular, pedestrian, and handicapped access, (2) programmed uses such as interpretive facilities, (3) buffering; maintenance and management practices, and (4) habitat protection. Local citizen input and support of a plan is key to the success of a management plan. PEC proposes to develop a management plan based on City staff and a citizens' task force input on the issues they are concerned with .. The development of a specific task force will be left to the discretion of City staff; however, the task force or commission should be representative of the variety of issues and concerns associated with the park. Two task force meetings are proposed as follows: Education and Exchange of Ideas -The first task force meeting will start out with an educational component the history and current status of the site as it relates to flora, fauna, non-native species impacts, and public use. Following this background, PEC will include a session where the task force produces a list of goals for the site. This will give PEC the opportunity to consider the needs, concerns, and ideas of the citizens. These goals will then be used to begin drafting a management plan to fit those needs. Priorities and Implementation -The second task force meeting will include recommendations of management methods that would best suit the goals for the area. The task force or commission will be asked to evaluate the methods and goals and prioritize their importance through consensus building. After this meeting, PEC will final the draft of the management plan for review by necessary groups. Final Plan After staff and task force comments on the draft plan are returned to PEC, a final report will be prepared using the outline provided in the request for proposal or as modified by the previous meetings. The report will contain a site-specific plan that provides for; (1) mechanical, chemical and/or fire management for desirable species and communities, (2) eradication methods for infestations of non-native species and noxious weeds (e.g. leafy spurge, common buckthorn, Tatarian honeysuckle), (3) compatible public uses within the context of potentially sensitive habitats, and (4) clear signage and access to the site. Maps of the site with survey infonnation and overall site plan will be prepared on the 1994 USGS orthophoto quadrangle maps. The information will be compatible with AutoCAD 14.0 and AutoCAD MAP. PEC will follow-up with attendance at one Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting and one City Council meeting for discussion and/or approval of the final plan. City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 8 '1 PROJECT SCHEDULE Notice to Proceed August 11, 1997 Inventory Summary (existing data and data collection) August 11 to September 10, 1997 Prepare and Attend 2 Task Force Meetings Before September 30, 1997 Draft Report October 7, 1997 Final Report October 20, 1997 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission November 3, 1997 Report Review City Council Report Review ovember 4, 1997 PEC agrees to the tenns and conditions set forth in this proposal for the preparation of a . management plan for the Prairie Bluff Conservation Area. The tenns and conditions of this proposal will remain valid for a period of sixty days from July 11, 1997. Peterson Environmental Consulting, Inc. ~.~ Ronald P. Peterson President g:lproposaIl1997/80-264/proposl.doc City of Eden Prairie --Management Plan for Prairie Bluff Conservation Area Page 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: Aug. 5, 1997 Section: Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department: PRNR #' Update and Recommedations on Deer Management Item No.: Stuart A. Fox, Manager Program XC2-Parks & Natural Resources BACKGROUND: After nine months of study in 1993 and 1994, the City's Deer Study Committee made a recommendation to the City Council regarding several aspects of deer management within the City. One part of the deer management plan was to reduce the number of deer in the City to a density of approximately 25 deer per square mile of habitat. When the Deer Study Committee was meeting, the City aerial census indicated that there were 600 deer in the City. The aerial census was confined to creek corridors and large woodland tracts and undeveloped farm areas throughout the City. The reduction method chosen by the City Council was to utilize a baited site with a sharp shooter. The City hired a contractor for each of the three management years. The emphasizes of the management program was to reduce the nwnber of animals found in highly concentrated numbers in specific areas and not totally eliminate the deer from the City in any given area. The number of animals taken were as follows: • 1994-95 season -125 • 1995-96 season -100 • 1996-97 season -160 The attached chart shows the various areas of the City that were defined and gives the specific deer density nwnbers associated with those areas. In addition, the City has continued·to accumulate other information such as the annual aerial helicopter census, as well as keeping track of deer vehicle collisions. PROGRAM WEATHER OBSERVATIONS During the past three years of the deer management program we have had a wide variety of weather conditions. The 1994-95 season was marked by a winter of very little snow. This resulted in a difficult time in drawing animals into given baiting sites. During the 1995-96 season we had a relatively normal winter with snow depths and somewhat cold winter conditions. In the 1996-97 management season we had extremely deep snow conditions with little or no frost. Because of the wide variety of winters that we have had, we have had mixed success in reduction of deer in certain areas of the City. Currently, we still have high concentrations of deer in zone one, zone two, zone eight, and zone nine. The Minnesota River bottoms, zone ten, is counted simply to get an idea ofthe " holding area" for Purgatory Creek, zone nine. I The reduction of deer with usage of a sharp shooter has been very successful in terms of making sure that first the program is conducted in a safe manner; and, secondly that any animals shot are done so in a humane way. In the three years operation, a police officer has always been at or very near the shooting site to provide another set of eyes and ears for all safety purposes. In addition, a signage system was developed to post any nearby trails or areas which people may utilize for recreational activities. ADJACENT DEER POPULATIONS The City has been in contact with adjacent communities to monitor how many deer they are removing in their programs and what their aerial census counts indicate. It is apparent that deer are moving across City boundaries into Minnetonka, Edina and Bloomington and vice versa. Due to highway construction along the Crosstown, numerous animals were moving through the Purgatory Creek corridor in that northerly area of the City. Other concentrations of deer have developed along the upper Purgatory Creek corridor in the area of Timber Woods and the lower Purgatory Creek from Staring Lake down to the Minnesota River. It is apparent that deer frequently move throughout this entire corridor depending on snow conditions. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is currently undertaking a tracking program to radio track white tail deer in Bloomington. They have notified us that several of these radio collared deer have been located in Eden Prairie and they will continue to monitor the deer for a minimum oftwo years. It is hoped that this type of program in an urban area will help better model the range and interaction of urban deer, which appears to be slightly different from rural animal populations. DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: The deer reduction program concentrated on the reduction of the female deer population in the City. This was done by only taking animals at the bait sites that were anterless. Occasionally, a buck with a broken leg or other physical problems would show up at the site and only after very close scrutiny were those animals taken. The difficultly in reducing the number of animals in certain areas is primarily due to the following reasons: • Artificial feeding occurring in and around the bait site area. • Difficulties in finding safe shooting locations. • Finding out the manner in which the deer move through the area. Whether they get to the bait site in the evening hours or morning hours. • Contamination of the shoot site which discourages deer from coming into the area. • The wind direction. The primary wind direction sometimes made it difficult to utilize certain shooting sites because the animals were able hear or sense humans present at the site. The staff is continuing to monitor calls related to deer damage and find that most individuals who call have major concerns regarding two items, artificial feedings and the excessive number of deer feeding on landscaping, flowers, or garden vegetables in their yard. The staff believes that at least a couple 2 more years of reduction will be necessary to stabilize the deer population at desired rates throughout the City. Because of the commitment that the City has made towards preservation of open space and development oflarge community park areas, the staff has emphasized that the primary goal of the reduction program is to make sure that people will still see white tail deer. The management goal is to balance the nwnber of deer with the habitat. This will reduce the number of vehicle/deer collisions and severe browse damage to private property. RECOMMENDATIONS: Over the past three years, The City has reduced the number of deer in the City through the deer management program. However, the staff feels that these numbers are still too high in several locations of the City. A condition ofthe Deer Study Committee recommendation was to not reduce any given area by more than 25% of the total animals in that area. The staff would like to modifY that primarily because removal of 25% still enables the population to reproduce at a level that could exceed the reduction proposed for that particular area. Another concern that has surfaced is that of artificial feeding. It is apparent from information received both from citizens and the wildlife biologist doing the aerial count that feeding deer plays a role in the locations in which deer over winter in the City. The controversy surrounding banning feeding is one that has been debated by several communities and is one that is difficult to enforce since it must be done on a complaint basis. The staff feels that publicizing the reasons that feeding of deer can result in increased populations and increased damage certainly should be discussed. Several of the surrounding communities have indicated that they are continuing their deer management programs in an effort to reduce the overall nwnber of deer in the community and balance the number of animals with the amount of habitat available. The staff would recommend that the City Council approve funding of the Deer Managment Program for the 1997-98 season, as well as the 1998-99 season. The guidelines under which the program would be operated would be the same as adopted in the 1994 Deer Community Study Report, which includes: • Program would continue with the baiting and sharp shooting method for reduction. • A police officer be utilized as the safety person at each ofthe sites. • The reduction focus primarily on anterless deer. Male animals are taken only if they are injured or not displaying a antler rack of six points or greater. • The City continue with the annual aerial deer census. • The police continue to compile information pertaining to deer vehicle collisions within the City • The areas of the City that currently allow bow and shotgun slug hunting encourage maximum reduction under the DNR Metro License Program. The staff feels that continuation of the Deer Mangement Program will accomplish the goals that were originally set by the Deer Study Committee. Goals include that: • The deer population would be reduced in the safest most humane way. • The program would be done in the safest manner to safeguard the citizens of Eden Prairie. • The white tail deer will still be present in the City. SAF:mdd -deermanlStu96 3 Zone Zone Name IP Edenbrook Conservation Area IS Wyndham. Rustic Hills, Tree Fann ddensity/Stuart96 April 4, 1997 1994 -1997 DEER DENSITY .41 .40 34 83 42 102 60 43 36 88 City of Eden Prairie Community Development Department To whom it may concern: As residents of Prairie View Drive we are not now and never have been opposed to prudent land development in the city of Eden Prairie. The overall planned development of our city should be the envy of the whole metro area. We are, however, strongly opposed to the development concept called Wynstone by Jasper development corporation. This proposed development is surrounded on three sides by single family homes on low density residential sites, To change the comprehensive guide plan at this point to a medium density would have a detrimental effect on existing developments. Our understanding of the comprehensive guide plan is that it is a long range plan that has been developed to protect the quality of life in the city and to protect the best interests of the residents. This proposed change, in our opinion and the opinion of the majority of the neighbors we have talked to, does not represent our best interest or our wishes. The Jasper development corporation indicated in a previous hearing that they could not make a profit by developing this land as single family homes on low density sites, A well planned, attractive single family development just to the North of the proposed Wynstone went in just the last year. Are we to assume that the developer of this site developed it at a loss? I don't think so. I would suspect that Jasper development is not looking at profit and loss, bit rather at amount of profit. Weare asking only that the city stay with the goals of the long range guide plan to protect the quality of existing neighborhoods and to represent the wishes and concerns of the areas residents. MR. and Mrs. Terry L Fields 7141 Prairie View Drive Eden Prairie, Mn. 55346 August 5, 1997 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota Dear Madam Mayor and Council, Due to a schedule conflict I cannot attend the meeting of August 5, 1997 but I would like to express the feelings of Taurus Properties and Homes by Registry towards the Jasper Homes proposal for the property to the South of Forest Hills 8th Addition---which Plat was developed by Taurus and Registry. 1. We are not opposed to Townhomes in and of themselves. We do object to a very modest priced Townhome project next to our homes. If Jasper Homes were to come in under a PUD with a higher value project we probably would not object. 2. Taurus has tried several times to purchase these 3 prop- erties. They are priced so high that single family detach- ed just doesn't work. We wanted to propose Townhomes for the ared so as to effect a higher density, and therefor a much lower per lot cost, but were told, by Planning, that there was no way they could support that concept in that area and that the City policy generally did not look favorably on what would generally be considered spot zon- ing. We then backed off from any proposal. We feel that if Townhome zoning was not available to us it should not be available to others. 3. We realize that talk of values is not politically exped- ient----however, maintenance of property values is very important to those people already in the neighborhood. 4. We recommend that this proposal be denied and that the Developer be encouraged to come back with a single family detached layout that is more compatible with the density of the existing neighborhood. Perhaps the current owners of the subject properties will get more realistic in their sales price in order to make this possible. 5. Last, but not least, we are opposed to an extension of Forest Hills Road into our property. We still have 9 lots in Forest Hills 8th Addition so we do have more than pass- ing interest in this proposal not coming to fruition.Taurus Homes by Registry, Inc. 12400 Whitewater Dr. Suite 175, Minnetonka, MN. 55343 935-8811 Fax 935-2111 MN. BL#7725