Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 03/18/1997 AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL. PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS & APPEALS MEETING TUESDAY,MARCH 18, 1997 6:30 PM, CITY CENTER Heritage Room II 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris,Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case,Ross Thorfinnson,Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens PLANNING COMMISSION : Kenneth E. Clinton, Randy Foote, Bill Habicht, Ismail Ismail, Katherine Kardell,Douglas Sandstad,Mary Jane Wissner and Youth/Student Representative Jessica Lind BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS & APPEALS: Corrine Dalquist, Cliff Dunham,Kathy Nelson, Matthew Hansen,Delavan Dye, Louis Giglio and William Ford CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Julie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, City Planner Michael Franzen,Zoning Administrators Jean Johnson and Steve Durham and Council Recorder Jan Nelson ROLL CALL I. INTRODUCTIONS II. IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES REQUIRING COUNCIL INPUT A. Future Land Uses for Southwest Eden Prairie B. Comprehensive Guide Plan Changes for Higher Density III. OTHER BUSINESS IV. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 1997 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES A. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1997 B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1997 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. KOPESKY ADDITION by Wayne Kopesky. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.32 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Kopesky Addition. Location: West 82nd Street. (Ordinance for Rezoning) City Council Agenda Tuesday, March 18, 1997 Page Two C. BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION by Bearpath Limited Partnership. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 2.3 acres and Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 2.3 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Bearpath 8th Addition for Bearpath Limited Partnership. Location: East of Bearpath Trail South, west of Dell Road and south of Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority. (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change) D. RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7; ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS THEREFOR E. ONKEN PROPERTY by Paul and Kris Onken. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.27 acres for one single family home and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for Onken Property. Location: 17809 West 62nd Street. (Ordinance for Rezoning) F. MHFA FIRST TIME BUYER PROGRAM (Resolution) G. APPROVE BIDS FOR STARING LAKE PLAYGROUND RENOVATION H. AMENDMENT TO FEE RESOLUTION (Resolution) I. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CSAH 4/HIGH SCHOOL ENTRANCE/ EDENWOOD DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 96-5404 (Resolution) J. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF PURGATORY CREEK ESTATES (located south of Sunnvbrook Road and west of Homeward Hills Road) K. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT, I.C. 94-5350 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. SUNNYBROOK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, ORDER IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, I.C. 94-5363 (Resolution) City Council Agenda Tuesday, March 18, 1997 Page Three B. PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER RENOVATION 1997 by Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 9.46 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.46 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the C-COM Zoning District on 9.46 acres, and Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres. Location: Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) C. PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE by Four S. Properties Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Park District on 4.96 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.96 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.21 acres into one lot. Location: County Road 4, south of Terrey Pine Court. (Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) D. CENTRON DPL by Centron DPL. Request for PUD Concept Review and PUD District Review on 5 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the 1-2 Zoning District on 5 acres and Site Plan Review on 5 acres. Location: City West Parkway. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review and Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment) E. EDENVALE CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER by CSM Corporation. Request for Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres, PUD Concept Amendment on 12.7 acres, PUD District Review on 12.7 acres , Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 2.9 acres, and from Rural to 1-2 on 9.8 acres, Site Plan Review on 12.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 12.7 acres into 3 lots. Location: South and east of Anagram Drive. (Resolution for Guide Plan Change, Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) F. CHIMNEY PINES by Laukka-Jarvis, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 1.29 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the R1-9.5 acre District on 1.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.29 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.29 acres into 8 lots. Location: Spyglass Drive, south of Riverview Road. (Resolution for PUD Amendment, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) City Council Agenda Tuesday, March 18, 1997 Page Four G. VACATION 97-01: DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN BOULDER POINTE (Resolution) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. TELECOMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE - Report X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Report on City Manager's Performance Evaluation Session B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Proposed Improvements to the Eden Prairie Community Center Pool - HVAC and Pool Disinfectant Systems 2. Proposed Policy on Priority Use of City Facilities 3. Flying Cloud Field Traffic Study Report D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT City Council Agenda Tuesday, March 18, 1997 Page Five E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Award Contract for Interior Painting of Baker Road Reservoir, I.C. 96-5419 (Resolution) 2. Award Contract for Parks/Public Works Maintenance Facility, I.C. 96-5417 (Resolution) 3. Review Proposed Surcharge for Lawn Irrigation/ Conservation F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 25, 1997 7:00 p.m. CITY CENTER JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL Heritage Room II BOARD MEETING 8080 Mitchell Road COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Councilmembers Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens SCHOOL BOARD: Chair,Karen V. Norman, Vice Chair Mary G. Endorf, Clerk Ann H. Yonamine, Treasurer Mark E. Kantor, Director Carol L. Bomben, Director David W. Hann, Director Barbara Gabbed CITY STAFF: City Manager Carl Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, City Engineer Al Gray, Assistant City Engineer Rod Rue, and Council Recorder Barbara Anderson SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFF: Superintendent Bill Gaslin, Executive Director of Business Services Merle Gamm, Director of Community Education Jeanne Zetah, Executive Director of Human Resources Mary Bollinger, Executive Assistant to Superin- tendent Cathy Wilkinson,Director of Teaching & Learning Larry Leebens, Student Support Services Director Gretchen Durkot, Director of Technology Karl Beach, Public Information Coordinator Judy Schell, Student Activities Director Steve Schultz I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. H. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Harris inquired if there were any corrections or additions to the agenda. There were none, and the agenda was approved as submitted. III. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. GUIDELINES FOR CITY/SCHOOL USE OF FACILITIES 1. Memorandum of Understanding Lambert discussed the proposed Memorandum of Understanding which is in the process of being drafted and will be forwarded to the City Council and the JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING Tuesday, February 25, 1997 Page 2 School Board for approval within the next two months. He commented many agreements between the City and the School District have been verbal in the past and it was now time to put them into writing for the purposes of clarity and to avoid confusion in the future. There are things that are being added at this time so the Memorandum is not yet completed. The Memorandum of Understanding will be reviewed by the City/School Facility Use Advisory Committee prior to being presented to the City Council and School Board for approval. 2. Fees and Charges Lambert discussed a spreadsheet which had been compiled to illustrate the various charges and fees involved in the area of facility use so that everyone would have an idea of what had been charged for each facility along with comments that staff felt were relevant. The City/School Facility Use Advisory Committee will review and evaluate this policy on a six month basis. Both the City and the School Board are charged direct costs for each other's use of facilities, as well as for use of facilities by other community groups. Zetah commented they have been considering charging the City only for programs where they have to open the building and provide staffing. They would not charge for use of facilities that are already open. There are many ramifications and adjustments that have to be made to this system to ensure a balance and still keep costs down for residents and the other users of facilities throughout the community. Discussion ensued regarding the use of the gate fees from hockey games and the way it will be dealt with in the joint powers agreement. The users of each facility would pay the majority of the operating expenses but the school still gets a reduced charge. The Community Center is getting about 60% of the operating costs back and the City is picking up the balance. To keep the community pools, such as the one in Chaska, operating at peak usage they have to keep adding new features to keep the interest level up. 3. City/School Facility Advisory Committee Lambert reviewed the committee and the purpose for which it was established. It will meet once a month for the first year or so, and thereafter perhaps three or four times each year as needed. B. OAK POINT SCHOOL PARKING EXPANSION UPDATE Bill Gaslin stated that the Oak Point School parking lot expansion will commence as soon as possible when the weather permits. They hope to have the construction completed by June. 2 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING Tuesday, February 25, 1997 Page 3 C. ACTIVITY CENTER UPDATE Bill Gaslin stated they are looking at fall before they have a design to put before the public. He asked the City staff to participate in the design phase as it must be defined and have a review to meet the statutory requirements for publication. D. COMMUNITY CENTER POOL IMPROVEMENT UPDATE Lambert stated they are behind schedule on this project and the consultant has given a preliminary report to staff, but he was not satisfied with it. It showed how they could increase the number of air changes per hour by six times but these are minimums that would be met and they need maximums as far as fresh air in the pool area is concerned. He asked to have eight air changes per hour and they will do that but he wants the City Council to understand what the costs are and what they will get for their money. He has talked to the school about sharing costs for these improvements but the costs are because of the competitive teams that use the facility so they will have to look at the rents they charge to recoup at least some of the costs of this upgrade. He did not have figures at this time but the School Board can expect there to be some increases in the fees for the pool use. They will also charge the teams that use the facility but the Foxjets already pay more than other teams in the metro area. Discussion ensued regarding program changes to facilitate pool uses and make it more feasible to reduce the amount of improvements and thereby the costs. Lambert commented that many senior citizens have dropped out of the aqua aerobics classes because the water temperatures are lowered to accommodate the competitive swimmers. Every possibility will have to be considered to resolve these conflicts. Possible uses for each facility were discussed. The Parks Commission has been dealing with a policy on facility use and what fees should be charged for residential and non-residential use and what should be given priority status. Both swim teams that use Eden Prairie facilities have about 75% of their members who live or go to school in Eden Prairie and these swimmers could be charged a residential rate. The remaining swimmers would be charged a non-resident fee which would be determined in the future. There is a great deal which has yet to be decided regarding this issue. E. POTENTIAL NEW "PARTNERSHIPS" BETWEEN CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. Environmental Education Lambert stated that staff has been reviewing the environmental education opportunities in the schools and the possibility of creating a full-time position in partnership with the school district to facilitate this type of learning which can occur in Eden Prairie. It is an opportunity to do something unique in Eden Prairie that would benefit the entire community. The possibility of using a grant from Hennepin County to have a naturalist on loan to provide educational experiences in the schools was discussed. The naturalist would 3 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING Tuesday, February 25, 1997 Page 4 be used to teach the teachers to facilitate the program with the nature trails, etc. Concern was expressed that the projects already begun would be abandoned, and it was noted that the existing program had already been picked up and expanded using the "Masterpiece" framework. It was also mentioned that the new water treatment facility could be used as a means of teaching an environmentally sound curriculum, as had been discussed earlier. The possible aspects of teaching environmental stewardship were discussed and the opportunities of doing this utilizing learning sites throughout Eden Prairie adjacent to all the schools, which would culminate in being brought together at the environmental center. 2. Data Processing Julie commented that the City has been discussing ways of sharing technology with the School District, and the District was interested in a fiber optic system to link all the schools and they have met with a contractor to discuss this possibility. IV. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS B. REPORTS OF SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS V. OTHER BUSINESS Bill Gaslin stated that strategic planning has begun and the School District has been redefining their mission statement and goals. These were based on a community survey which was done to gather baseline information from the community regarding resident's perceptions of the School District and they have put numerous groups together to develop concept maps of everything they felt were priorities for the School District. This is the most complicated map their consultants have seen but it also has more commonalities than other maps have had. The School Board has reviewed and refined this map and now they are drafting a mission statement and goals which will result in task forces being formed. They hope to write their strategic plan by next November. The plan will address the next five years but it will be reviewed annually and modified as needed. Karen Norman commented she has been involved in two collaboratives that have been done between the City and School District and she hoped that this process could be continued. Case commented he believed a list of the ways in which the City and the School District have existing partnerships, such as the Police Liaison Officers, would be helpful in determining ways in which these could be maximized to their fullest potential. Carol Bomben commented that it was an asset to have this type of cooperation occurring within the community, and she had perceived a need for a place for teens to be able to go and "hang out", and this seemed to continue to arise. Barb Gabbert commented perhaps some retail space that wasn't being used could be explored as a possible space for teens to use. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING Tuesday, February 25, 1997 Page 5 Bill Gaslin stated the cooperation between the City and School Board was wonderful and created many opportunities as well as challenges to improve the community. Mary Endorf commented they need to remember the children and families they serve and how they will make improvements and move forward. She commented diversity was important and she hoped they could work together to develop things to their greatest potential. It was noted that the small, daily relationships between the City and School District staff help the partnerships to work and keep the process moving. Mark Kantor suggested that perhaps it would be a good idea to have a representative of the City Council attend School Board meetings and a School Board member attend City Council meetings to facilitate communication between the two groups. Mayor Harris commented that as the Cityis developing the demographics have changed Y p g rapidly, and they have moved beyond the period of focusing on the development of the City to the point where they need to look at things that will keep the community vibrant and alive so the people will want to remain here to live out their lives in Eden Prairie. The City Council wants to have a community which is growing, alive and well, given the age differences within the residential population. She believed the teen center idea needed to be developed further. Dietz stated that a cooperative agreement for work on Highway 4 had been signed with Hennepin County and they were ready to let the contract. The roadway improvements should be completed by fall in time for school to begin. Case commented that student parking in the area was a good topic for a future discussion item. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 5 Thi43 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1997 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher- Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Ric Rosow, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Councilmember Thorfinnson arrived late. PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING GIRL SCOUT WEEK, MARCH 9-16, 1997 Mayor Harris read a proclamation proclaiming March 9-16, 1997, as Girl Scout Week in the City of Eden Prairie. Several Girl Scouts and their leaders were present for the proclamation. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Case added item XI.A.1. Comment about Family Fun Fest. Jullie added item IV. M. RESOLUTION CONCURRING IN THE JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFERS OF CSAH 18 AND TH 101 BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND TUE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and provided copies of an amended resolution for item IV.H. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried unanimously. H. OPEN_PS212TJTM III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1997 MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve as published the Minutes of the City Council Workshop meeting held Tuesday, February 4, 1997. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 2 B. CITY COUNCIL.MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRU RY 18,997 Case said spellings in paragraph 1, page 4, should be changed to "Rosow" and paragraph 10, page 4, should be changed to "Hagman." Tyra-Lukens said paragraph 4, page 16, should be changed as follows: "Tyra- Lukens said that concerns regarding financial accountability led to a meeting today between City representatives and Southwest Metro staff. They developed a planned reporting structure to ensure that City Council and staff are well informed about Southwest Metro activities." MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to approve as published and amended the minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, February 18, 1997. Motion carried unanimously. C. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1997 MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case, to approve as published the minutes of the City Council Workshop held Tuesday, February 18, 1997. Motion carried unanimously. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. DON PABLO RESTAURANT by DF & R Restaurants, Inc. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 6-97-PUD-3-97 for PUD District Review on 2.12 acres and Zoning District Amendment in the C-Reg-Ser Zoning District on 2.12 acres, Adoption of Resolution 97-29 for Site Plan Review on 2.12 acres and Approval of a Developer's Agreement for DF & R Restaurants, Inc. Location: North of 494, west of Prairie Center Drive, south of Viking Drive. (Ordinance 6-97-PUD-3- 97 for Zoning District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution 97-29 for Site Plan Review) C. EDEN PRAIRIE MAINTENANCE FACILITY by the City of Eden Prairie. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 7-97-PUD-4-97 for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from I-5 to I-2 on 7.6 acres and Adoption of Resolution 97-30 for Site Plan Review on 7.6 acres. Location: 15150 Technology Drive. (Ordinance 7-97-PUD-4-97 for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution 97-30 for Site Plan Review) D. CODE CHANGE (LOT WIDTH) 2nd Reading of Ordinance 8-97 amending the Residential Districts. (Ordinance 8-97) 2 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 3 E. 2ND READING OF ORDINANCE 5-97 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.49-96, SECTIONS 5.45 AND 9.14 F. RESOLUTION 97-31 APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF BOULDER POINTE 6TH ADDITION (located South of Boulder Pointe Road and North of Mitchell Road) G. RESOLUTION 97-32 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR I.C. 97-5431 1997 STREET SWEEPING H. RESOLUTION 97-33 APPROVING CONSENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER WITH THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FOR RESTORATION OR MITIGATION OF THE PARTICIPATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROPERTY I. APPROVE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ON MIGHTY DUCKS GRANT PROJECT J. APPIMEOPENING_DEJBEACHE&OhLTHEIIRSI_DAIDESILMMER VACATION K. APPROVE CONTRACTS FOR VENDING SERVICES AT THE EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER L. APPROVE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS/KLEIN-PETERSON PURCHASE Regarding item J, Case asked if we could consider using the money saved by delaying the beach openings on another project such as the Fourth of July celebration. Butcher-Younghans asked if we would put up signs at the beaches regarding swimmers going at their own risk and how we will handle the potential liability. Lambert said the beaches are closed by ordinance and no one is allowed to swim. The Park Rangers will monitor the beaches. Case asked if we know whether the County Park is open on Memorial Day. Lambert said they have not been in the past, and they are also cutting back on the number of days that beaches are guarded. Harris asked if there is a liability when the beaches are open. Rosow said he did not believe there is a liability based on the statutory protection of operation of municipal parks. M. RESOLUTION 97-34 CONCURRING IN THE JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFERS OF CSAH 18 AND TH 101 BETWEEN HENNEPIN 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 4 COUNTY AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve items A- M of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS A. 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING PROPOSALS (CDBG) (Resolution 97-35) Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 20, 1997 in the Eden Prairie News. The City's 1997 Community Development Block Grant entitlement is $189,472 and will be available beginning in July. Each year the City Council must conduct a Public Hearing and determine an allocation of the CDBG funds. As has been customary, the Housing, Transportation and Social Services Board (HTSSB) reviewed and recommended the CDBG funding allocation at its February 6 meeting. Jullie said the recommendations from HTSSB and supporting background information are included with the Staff agenda report of March 4, 1997. The recommendations are for 20% of the funding allocations ($37,467) to go to human service activities and the remaining amount of$151,905 be allocated to housing related activities. This is in accordance with guideline priorities recommended by Hennepin County. Grace Norris, representing the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association, said they are currently serving four Eden Prairie families. She thanked the Council for the funding provided. Harris noted child care is one of the most important services that can be provided to people. Jennifer Ruhland, representing the Community Action for Suburban Hennepin Homeline, reviewed the services they provide and thanked the Council for the funding. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the Public Hearing and to adopt Resolution 97-35 approving the 1997 CDBG Funding Allocations as reviewed and recommended by the Housing, Transportation and Social Services Board per the Staff agenda report of March 4, 1997. Motion carried unanimously. B. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 27, 1997 in the Eden Prairie News. The Eden Prairie Police Department CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 5 applied for and was awarded a Federal Local Law Enforcement Block Grant in the amount of$10, 332 which has already been received. The City's obligation is a match of$1,148. This grant will be used to replace outdated and worn radio equipment, all in accordance with our long term planning. A requirement prior to spending any of these funds is to conduct a Public Hearing regarding the proposed use of this block grant. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing; and to direct Staff to proceed with utilization of the Federal Law Enforcement Block Grant as per the Staff agenda report of March 4, 1997. Motion carried unanimously. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote, with Butcher-Younghans, Case, Th rfunson Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye." " VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS X. APPOINTMENTS A. HUMAN RIGHTS & DIVERSITY COMNIISSION - One appointment to Human Rights & Diversity Commission for a three-year term Jullie said an opening exists on this Commission due to the recent resignation of Vladimir Kozyrev. Butcher-Younghans nominated Vicki Pellar-Price. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to close the nominations and to cast a unanimous ballot for Vicki Pellar-Price for a three- year term on the Human Rights & Diversity Commission. Motion carried unanimously. XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. Report of Councihnember Tyra-Lukens, Council Liaison to Southwest Metro Transit CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 6 Tyra-Lukens reported they have solicited applications for Executive Director and will be interviewing within the next two weeks. At the last meeting they discussed developing policies and procedures for building reserves and investments because Southwest Metro now has an increased financial responsibility as a result of the local levy option. She said they are exploring the possibility of a circulator bus route throughout the three cities. Dial-A-Ride would then be used to connect people to the circulator routes. This would make the operations more efficient; however, it will result in Chaska and Chanhassen having a fully unfeathered status. Harris asked if we have scheduled a Council briefing on the transit hub. Tyra-Lukens thought it might be more expedient to do that when we meet with the new Executive Director, possibly in conjunction with Chaska and Chanhassen. 2. Comments on Family Fun Fest Case complimented staff on their participation in the Family Fun Fest held at Oak Point Intermediate School last weekend. He said the event was very well attended and very successful. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES 1. 4th of July Fireworks (Continued from February 18 Council meeting) Referring to the staff agenda report of March 4, 1997, Lambert said staff has developed three options for possible changes in our traditional July 4 Community Celebration, including fireworks. At this time it appears very possible to stage the evening events, including fireworks, at the Eden Prairie Center. In terms of parking and road access, this is a most superior site. If successful this year, the event could be planned to continue there in future years as an appropriate focus on our downtown area, including the renovated Eden Prairie Center after 1998. He noted they have not yet received permission from Eden Prairie Center to hold the event there. Case said he had discussed this with Councilmember Butcher-Younghans and they believe this provides future opportunities down the line that we need to begin thinking about now. He would like staff to start looking at next year and the years to come for options to using Round Lake only as CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 7 we have in the past. We need to look at some possibilities that would accommodate up to 20,000 people in the future. Butcher-Younghans had received several calls from residents wanting to have the fireworks. She thought we need to look at this as a transition year and as an opportunity to look at other possibilities. Tyra-Lukens asked whether we could reserve July 6 as a backup date in case of bad weather on July 4. Tria Mann said they have asked for either date, but they could explore the possibility of reserving both dates. Case said that while cost is not everything, it is problematic. He asked staff to explore moving some of the day-time activities that were held at Round Lake in the past to other parks in the City, and to provide activities that will be low or no cost. Lambert thought they could explore the opportunity to try out different things. Butcher-Younghans thought it is essential to get the word out to people if we are able to have the fireworks. She suggested using the newspaper and to having flyers sent out with school children. Case said that while campaigning at the 1994 Fourth of July event he noticed about one out of five participants was not from Eden Prairie. The consensus was to proceed with Option 2 in the staff memorandum to have fireworks at the Eden Prairie Center on July 4, 1997, provided the permission of Eden Prairie Center is obtained. 2. Proposed Donations from Eden Prairie Soccer Association and Eden Prairie Baseball Association for Improvements to Flying Cloud Fields Lambert said we have received donation proposals from the Eden Prairie Soccer and Baseball Associations for improvements to the Flying Cloud ballfields, as outlined in the staff report of March 4, 1997. The Soccer Association also made a request for the City to consider expansion of the property leased from Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) for the purpose of doubling the number of soccer fields at that site. The total dollar amount of donations proposed towards the irrigation, fencing, warning track and sod equals $37,400. The total project cost will be $57,400, leaving a balance of$20,000 to be covered by cash park fees. Lambert said the Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Commission reviewed the proposal last evening and recommended approval of the $20,000 expenditure for the improvements from Cash Park fees. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 4, 1997 Page 8 Tyra-Lukens asked where these improvements stand on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Lambert said we have talked about doing these things but they are not presently part of the CIP. He said MAC had several expansion plans, one of which included taking all of the fields away from us. The plan that was approved by MAC has no intention of putting hangars in that area, so staff now feels comfortable in making recommendations for the improvements. He noted staff will be coming to the Council in two weeks with the results of the traffic study for road and parking improvements in that area. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to accept the proposed donations from the Soccer Association and the Baseball Association as per the Staff agenda report of March 4, 1997, and to authorize Staff to obtain bids for the proposed improvements; and to authorize Staff to request the Metropolitan Airport Commission to consider expansion of the lease for Flying Cloud ballfields westerly to Spring Road. Motion carried unanimously. Tyra-Lukens suggested we extend a note of thanks to the Soccer and Baseball Associations for their donations. D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS A. CITY MANAGER EVALUATION (closed session) MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to move to a closed session for the purpose of completing the evaluation process. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Thorfinnson arrived at 8:40 p.m. XIII. ADTOURNMENT The Council met in closed session from 8:15 to 8:45 p.m., after which the meeting was adjourned. 0.15 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: e—°n SECTION: Consent Calendar 3/18/97 prairie DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Pat Solie Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR(MULTI-FAMILY& COMM.) GASFITTER Frana& Sons Inc Dependable Indoor Air Quality Inc Friendship Ventures Doody Mechanical Inc Gavic Construction Corp Diamond Power Mechanical Great Lakes Aircraft Inc Ferrellgas L P Grussing Roofing Inc Fredrickson Heating &A/C Hauenstein& Burmeister Inc G R Mechanical Helle Corporation H I S Plumbing Co Inc Integrated Construction Services Raymond Haeg Plumbing Inc M P Johnson Construction Inc Horwitz Inc Metal Specialties Inc J& H Gas Services Inc Midland Nursery Inc Mike Larson Plumbing Inc Retail Construction Services Inc McQuillan Bros Witcher Construction Co McGuire& Son Plumbing & Heating Mid-City Mechanical Corp PLUMBING Minnegasco Mission Mechanical Chaska Building Center Preferred Mechanical Services Inc Doody Mechanical Inc State Mechanical Inc Erickson Plumbing G R Mechanical HEATING & VENTILATING Gopher Mechanical Contractors Inc H I S Plumbing Co Inc Dependable Indoor Air Quality Inc Raymond Haeg Plumbing Inc Doody Mechanical Horwitz Inc Diamond Power Mechanical Mike Larson Plumbing Inc Erickson Plumbing LeVahn Brothers Excel Air Systems Inc McQuillan Bros Fisher-Bjork Sheetmetal Company Inc McGuire & Sons Plumbing & Heating Fredrickson Heating & A/C Mid-City Mechanical Corp G R Mechanical Mike's Plumbing Horwitz Inc South Metro Plumbing & Heating Judkins Heating & A/C South/West Metro Plumbing McQuillan Bros Southwest Plumbing McGuire & Sons Plumbing &Heating State Mechanical Inc March 18, 1997 1 erZ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: =1°r-I SECTION: Consent Calendar 3-18-97 prairies DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Pat Solie Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. HEATING & VENTILATING (continued) Preferred Mechanical Services Schwickert Company South Metro Plumbing & Heating UTILITY INSTALLER Minger Construction Inc State Mechanical Inc WATER SOFTENER Minnesota Water Treatment Inc March 18, 1997 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR -,-,f ITEM NO. 1 Y DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger KOPESKY ADDITION Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.32 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Rezoning 2. Developer's Agreement g:\fmkopesky.2 1 KOPESKY ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the "land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the R1-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of March 18, 1997, entered into between Wayne Kopesky and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of February, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 18th day of March, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ,. KOPESKY ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at West 82nd Street from Rural to R 1- 13.5 on 5.32 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) Exhibit A EXHIBIT A KOPESKY ADDITION Legal Description: ALL THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 22, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MIN-NESOTA, LYING LAST OF THE WEST 990.00 FEET y DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT KOPESKY ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 18, 1997, by Kopesky and Associates, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 5.32 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 5.32 acres into 13 single family lots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Zoning District Change, and Resolution No. 97-22 for Preliminary Plat, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS:Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated January 28, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on February 4, 1997 and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to theperformance and observance byDeveloper P g P at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Upon approval by the City Engineer,Developer agrees to implement the approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. 4. FINAL GRADING,DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. Upon completion of the housing construction and before the issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the Developer shall provide written verification to the City Engineer that the original design volume of the treatment pond to ensure that pond size has not diminished because of sedimentation/erosion and to restore original volume if sedimentation/erosion has occurred. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 5. PRETREATMENT POND: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall obtain the following special items for the stormwater treatment pond in the northwest corner of the Property: A. A permanent drainage easement over the northeast corner of the adjoining property, as shown in Exhibit B, to the City of Eden Prairie for construction and maintenance of the pond. The form of easement shall be approved by the City Engineer. B. A permit for the construction of the pond from the Corps of Engineers or a letter from the Corps of Engineers acknowledging no regulatory authority over the wetland in which the pond is constructed. C. A grading permit from the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District. 6. CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING WETLAND AREA: Developer shall execute the Conservation Easement attached as Exhibit E over the existing wetland area as depicted in Exhibit B, and shall provide evidence of the recording of the Conservation Easement in the Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrars Office prior to the release of the building permit. 7. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of, plans for demolition and/or removal of existing structures, septic systems, and wells on the Property, and restoration of the Property to grade. Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of$1,000.00 to guarantee compliance with the approved plan. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after it is verified by City that the structures, well, and/or septic system have been properly demolished or removed and that the Property has been restored to grade. 8. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT: Prior to approval of a final plat for the Property, Developer shall sign an assessment agreement for trunk utility improvements in the amount of$22,371.50. 7 KOPESKY ADDITION OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN KOPESKY AND ASSOCIATES AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 18, 1997, by and between Randy Kopesky, an Individual, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. - , changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, and Resolution No. - , for Preliminary Plat as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of March 18, 1997, by and between Kopesky and Associates, a Minnesota Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Kopesky and Associates, fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat identified above,thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. 7 KOPESKY ADDITION OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN KOPESKY AND ASSOCIATES AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into as of March 18, 1997, by and between Wayne Kopesky, an Individual, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. - , changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, and Resolution No. - , for Preliminary Plat as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of March 18, 1997, by and between Kopesky and Associates, a Minnesota Corporation, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Kopesky and Associates, fails to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Rezoning, and Preliminary Plat identified above,thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. q EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR �� ITEM NO. IV e. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 2.3 acres and Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 2.3 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Zoning Ordinance 2. Developer's Agreement I BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 9-97-PUD-5-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the "land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the RM-6.5 District and be placed in the R1-13.5 Zoning District 9-97-PUD-5-97 (hereinafter"PUD-5-97-R1-13.5"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of March 18, 1997, entered into between Bearpath Limited Partnership, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter"Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-5- 97-R1-13.5, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The CityCouncil herebymakes the followingfindin s: g A. PUD-5-97-R1-13.5 is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-5-97-R1-13.5 designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-5-97-R1-13.5 are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-5-97-R1-13.5 is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-5-97-R1-13.5 and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. 2 Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 17th day of December, 1996, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 18th day of March, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on . 3 BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 9-97-PUD-5-97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located East of Bearpath Trail South, west of Dell Road and south of Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 2.3 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a developer's agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/John D. Frane s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION Exhibit A Legal Description: Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 9, BEARPATH ADDITION,Hennepin County,MN DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 18, 1997, by Bearpath Limited Partnership, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Property described below is included in a Developer's Agreement between Bearpath Limited Partnership and City of Eden Prairie as of July 20, 1993 ("Bearpath Developer's Agreement"), and the parties desire to amend and supplement the Bearpath Developer's Agreement with respect to the Property described below; WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for PUD Concept Amendment on 2.3 acres, PUD District Review Amendment on 2.3 acres,Zoning District Change from RM-6.5 to R1-13.5 on 2.3 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.3 acres into 6 single-family lots, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota,more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 96-214 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. 9-97-PUD-5-97for PUD District Review Amendment and Zoning District Change, and Resolution No. 96-215 for Preliminary Plat, Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS:Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated December 10, 1996, reviewed and approved by the City Council on December 17, 1996, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of utilities, or for any building construction for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's approval of plans for sanitary sewer,water, interim irrigation systems and storm sewer. Upon approval by the City Engineer, Developer agrees to implement the approved utility plans prior to or concurrent with building permit issuance. 4. FINAL GRADING,DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 5. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the wooded areas on the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the City Forester's approval of a plan depicting the construction grading limits on the Property. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit,Developer shall place a construction fence at the limits of the proposed grading as shown on Exhibit B. Developer shall notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester. 6. CROSS ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Prior to release of the final plat,the Developer shall provide a cross access and maintenance agreement for the Property, approved by the City Engineer, which addresses vehicle access, maintenance of parking areas, driveways and storm sewers. All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer or owner. 7. PLANS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOME CONSTRUCTION: Prior to building permit issuance for each building unit, applicant shall submit a Certificate of Survey with the following information to the Building Department and receive written approval: A. Topography with 2 foot contour intervals for existing and proposed grades. Topography must be field verified. B. Location of structures with finished floor elevations. C. Retaining walls, type,height, and type of details. D. Location of sewer, water, gas and electric lines. E. Method of erosion control. F. Grading of each lot upon which a home or other structure is to be built shall be in accordance with the grading plan approved pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Agreement. G. No construction or grading within the conservancy easement. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size of plant materials as shown on the landscape plan as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of the cost of said improvements as required by City code. Upon approval by the City Planner, Developer agrees to implement the approved landscape plan concurrent with building construction on the Property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 9. PUB WAIVERS GRANTED: City hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the R1-13.5 Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property, as depicted in Exhibit B, and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD 5-97 : A. Lot size of 12,547 sq. ft. for lot 5. (Code requires a minimum lot size of 13,500 sq. ft.) B. Lot width less than 85 feet for lots 2, 3, 4, and 5. (Code requires a minimum of 85 feet.) C. Lots 1-6 without public road frontage. (Code requires single-family lots to have public road frontage.) D. Front yard setback of 20 feet for lot 6, and side yard setbacks totaling 20 feet on both sides for lots 4 and 5. (Code requires at least a 30 front yard setback, and side yard setbacks totaling 25 feet.) E. Zero lot line setback for driveways. (Code requires at least a 3 foot setback.) 10. REAFFIRMING CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT: Except as provided herein, the terms and conditions contained in the Bearpath Developer's Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 0 BEARPATH 8TH ADDITION OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN BEARPATH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 18, 1997 by and between R. E. C., INCORPORATED a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Resolution No. 96-214 for PUD Concept Amendment, Ordinance No.9-97-PUD-5-97for PUD District Review Amendment and Zoning District Change, and Resolution No. 96-215 for Preliminary Plat, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of March 18, 1997,by and between Bearpath Limited Partnership, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, and City("Bearpath 8th Addition Developer's Agreement"), Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Bearpath Limited Partnership fails to proceed in accordance with the Bearpath 8th Addition Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the PUD Concept Amendment, PUD District Review Amendment and Zoning District Change, and Preliminary Plat identified above,thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Bearpath 8th Addition Developer's Agreement. 4. Owner consents and agrees to the amendment and supplement of a Developer's Agreement made and entered into as of July 20, 1993 by and between Bearpath Limited Partnership and City pursuant to the terms of the Bearpath 8th Addition Developer's Agreement. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar March 18, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Resolution Relating ITEM NO. to Development District No. 1 & Tax Finance Department Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, TvO. 5, 6 & 7; Adopt Amendments to the Development Program & Tax Increment Financing Plans Background: The purpose of the proposed amendment is to authorize additional development activities to be undertaken by the City in the Development District. Specifically, Minnesota Statue 469.126 Subd. 2.(10) grants the City authority to lease all or portions of public buildings. The City's plan includes a new liquor store of about 6,000 square feet and additional lease space of about 7,100 square feet. The amendment to the TIF district is necessary to allow the City the ability to construct additional lease space to help defray the cost of the project. Therefore, the request to amend the TIF district is technical in nature. Requested Action: Approve Resolution finding that the amended Program conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. After some discussion,Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 AND 7; ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. On September 22, 1981, this Council designated under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, as amended, certain land within the City as Development District No. 1 (the "Development District") and adopted a Development Program therefor. The Development Program was subsequently amended by this Council on March 30, 1982, May 17, 1983, April 17, 1990, April 7, 1992, May 19, 1992 and September 7, 1993 (as so amended, the "Original Program"). Pursuant to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended (the "Act"), this Council has established Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 (collectively, the "Districts") within the Development District and has adopted and in some cases amended Tax Increment Financing Plans therefor(as originally adopted or, if amended, as so amended, the "Original Plans") on the dates indicated below: Tax Increment Date of Adoption Tax Increment Date of Adoption District No. or Modification District No. or Modification 1 9/22/81; modified 5 5/17/83; modified 3/20/82, 5/17/83 4/17/90, 4/7/92, 4/7/92, 5/19/92 5/19/92 and 9/7/93 and 9/7/93 2 3/20/82; modified 6 8/16/83; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/17/90, 4/7/92, 4/7/92, 5/19/92 5/19/92 and 9/7/93 and 9/7/93 3 11/16/82; modified 7 4/17/84; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/17/90, 4/7/92, 4/7/92, 5/19/92 5/19/92 and 9/7/93 and 9/7/93 4 3/15/83; modified 5/17/83, 4/17/90, 4/7/92, 5/19/92 and 9/7/93 z 1.02. It has been proposed that the City further amend its Development Program (the "Program Amendment") in order to authorize additional development activities to be undertaken by the City and private developers in the Development District and to amend the Original Plans (the "Plan Amendment") to provide for the payment of some of the administrative costs associated with the development activities authorized by the Program Amendment within the Development District. The Program Amendment has been transmitted to the planning agency of the City, which has determined that the Original Program as amended and supplemented by the Program Amendment (as so amended and supplemented, the "Program") conforms to the general plan for the development of the City. 1.03. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.126 and 469.175,the adoption of the Program Amendment and Plan Amendment is for the consideration of this Council. On February 18, 1997, this Council conducted a public hearing on the desirability of adopting the Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment. Notice of the public hearing was duly published as required by law in the Eden Prairie News, the official newspaper of the City on January 30, 1997. 1.04. Members of the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County,the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 272 and the Board of Education of Independent District No. 287 were given an opportunity to meet with the City and comment on the Plan Amendment. At least 30 days before the public hearing the City provided the county and the school district boards with information on the fiscal and economic implications of the Plan. Section 2. Adoption of Program Amendment. On the basis of the proposed Program Amendment prepared by officers of the City and the information elicited from consultation with the planning agency and at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 2.01. The Council hereby ratifies and confirms its determination that there is a need for new development in the area of the City encompassed by the Development District to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state. The Council hereby finds that the proposed development activities to be undertaken in the Development District pursuant to the Program Amendment would improve the Development District by encouraging development of property therein, thereby increasing employment and the tax base of the City and overlapping tax jurisdictions. It is in the best interests of the City to adopt the Program Amendment. 2.02. Upon review of the Program, the information elicited from the planning agency and at the public hearing, and on the basis of the findings made in Section 2.01, this Council hereby adopts the Program Amendment and orders that it be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 3. Approval of Plan Amendment. On the basis of the Plan Amendment and the information elicited at the public hearing referred to in Section 1.03, it is hereby found, determined and declared: 3.01. The Plan Amendment provides the means to finance the costs of the development activities to be undertaken in the Development District pursuant to the Program Amendment. The Original Plans, as amended and supplemented by the Plan Amendment (as so amended and supplemented, the "Plans") contain a statement of objectives for the improvement of the Development District, a statement as to the development program for the respective District and a statement of the property within the Development District which the City intends to acquire. The Plans also estimate the capital and administrative costs of the Development District, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, the sources of revenues to finance or otherwise pay public costs of the respective District, the captured net tax capacity of the respective District at completion and the duration of the District. The Plans also describe and identify the development activities to be undertaken or expected to be undertaken in each District. The Plan Amendment further contains an estimate of the impact of the proposed tax increment financing on the tax capacities of all taxing jurisdictions in which each District is located. All the captured tax capacity is necessary for the objectives of each District. 3.02. This Council hereby finds that the proposed development of the Development District to be encouraged pursuant to the Program Amendment would not, in the opinion of this Council,occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is necessary. The development activities to be undertaken in the Development District are necessary in order to permit additional development to occur within the Development District. 3.03. This Council hereby finds that the Plans conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Under the general plan for the development of the City the Districts are zoned so as to permit the uses proposed by the Program Amendment. 3.04. This Council hereby ratifies and confirms that the Plan Amendment will afford maximum opportunity,consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of each of the Districts by private enterprise. The development activities contemplated in the Program Amendment would provide an opportunity for a significant increase in employment opportunities in the City and enhance the tax base of the City. 3.05. Upon review of the Plans, the information elicited at the public hearing and on the basis of the findings in Sections 3.01 to 3.04,this Council hereby approves the Plan Amendment. Section 4. Filing. The Finance Director/Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the Program Amendment and the Plan Amendment with the Commissioner of Revenue as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2. Mayor Attest: Finance Director/Clerk LI The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the Finance Director/Clerk. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. Jam•E DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger ONKEN PROPERTY Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.27 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Rezoning 2. Developer's Agreement g:\fnonken.2 ONKEN PROPERTY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the R1-13.5 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the RI-13.5 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety,by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of March 18, 1997, entered into between Paul and Kris Onken and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 18th day of February, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 18th day of March, 1997. ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 2 ONKEN PROPERTY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 17809 West 62nd Street from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.27 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance,gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: Is/John D. Frane is/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) Exhibit A ONKEN ADDITION Exhibit A Legal Description: The West 162.25 of the East 792 feet of the North 671 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 116, Range 22. Except that part taken for County Road 62 per Document No. 6364394. if DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT 4 ONKEN ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into as of March 18, 1997,by Paul A. Onken and Kristi J. Onken, Husband and Wife, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to R1-13.5 on 2.27 acres for construction of a single family house, situated in Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and said acreage hereinafter referred to as "the Property;" NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for Zoning District Change,Developer covenants and agrees to construction upon, development, and maintenance of said Property as follows: 1. PLANS:Developer shall develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated January 6, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on February 18, 1997 and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer covenants and agrees to the performance and observance by Developer at such times and in such manner as provided therein of all of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF EXISTING WETLAND AREAS ON THE PROPERTY: Prior to issuance of a building permit, Developer shall submit Conservation Easement as depicted in Exhibit E, over the wetland areas of the Property as shown on Exhibit B, for review and approval by the Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources. Upon approval by the Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources, Developer shall deliver and record the Conservation Easement in the Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrars Office and shall provide evidence of the recording of Conservation Easement prior to the release of the building permit. 5. FINAL GRADING,DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer acknowledges that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and storm sewers. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's approval of an Erosion Control Plan for the Property. The Erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures. All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall implement the approved plan prior to, or concurrent with building construction. 6. REMOVAL/SEALING OF EXISTING WELL: Prior to issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to submit to the Chief Building Official and obtain the Chief Building Official's approval of, plans for demolition and/or removal of existing structures, septic systems, and wells on the Property. Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a certified check in the amount of$1,000.00 to guarantee compliance with the approved plan. City agrees to return said certified check to Developer after it is verified by City that the structures, well, and/or septic system have been properly demolished or removed and that the Property has been restored to grade. 7. UTILITY EASEMENTS: Prior to the release of the building permit for the Property, Developer shall convey to the City a 10 foot wide drainage and utility easement along the front perimeter of the Property, and 5 foot wide drainage and utility easements along the side and rear perimeters of the Property. 8. CONNECTION FEE: Developer agrees that this Property will be subject to a connection fee for sanitary sewer and water main in the amount of$11,330.00. This fee is due at the time of building permit. As an alternate to a lump sum payment,the Developer may petition the City to have this fee assessed to the Property over a five (5)year payment schedule. ONKEN ADDITION OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN PAUL A. ONKEN AND KRISTI J. ONKEN AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of March 18, 1997, by and between JAMES STANS, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, hereinafter referred to as "City": For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. , changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the R1-13.5 District, as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of March 18, 1997, by and between Paul A. Onken and Kristi J. Onken, and City, Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Paul A. Onken and Kristi J. Onken, fail to proceed in accordance with the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date hereof, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Rezoning identified above,thus restoring the existing status of the property before this project was approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner, its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers such Property, Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to the terms of the Developer's Agreement. 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calender March 18, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO: Community Development MHFA First Time Buyer / F Chris Enger Program ' David Lindahl REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Approve resolution authorizing the City's participation in the 1997 Minnesota Cities Participation Program (MCPP), and the execution of all related agreements. BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) is again sponsoring the MCPP to help local communities provide home ownership opportunities to first time buyers. MHFA sells bonds to provide low-interest mortgage loans for low and moderate income first time home buyers. Private mortgage lenders originate these loans. This will be the sixth year Eden Prairie's has participated in this Program. SPECIFICS: Funding Amount - $815,262 MHFA determines the funding amount using a population-based formula. Income Limits - $45,840 Set by MHFA- 80%of median income for family of four. Maximum Purchase Price - $95,000 The funds can be used to purchase new and existing homes(single family, Townhouses, Condos, or doubles). Participation Fee - $160 The City must pay a fee of $20 for every $100,000 allocated. Participating Lenders - All lenders on MHFA's participation list. Marketing - The City will again help market the program through local newspapers,the community newsletter, and various other publications. Homes Sold in 1996 - 12 $931,243 in mortgage funds were used in 1996. Time lines - March Bond sale April Program Begins September City allocation period ends, all unused funds "collapse" into a single, statewide pool. December Program Ends. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:, Resolution CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION# A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE'S PARTICIPATION IN THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S (MHFA)MINNESOTA CITIES PARTICIPATION PROGRAM(MCPP) WHEREAS,The City of Eden Prairie is eligible to participate in the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's(MHFA) Minnesota Cities Participation Program(MCPP) for the purpose of assisting first time home buyers in purchasing homes in Eden Prairie. WHEREAS,By participating in the MCPP the City will allow MHFA to access the City of Eden Prairie's local government bond authority to sell bonds on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. WHEREAS,The proceeds from MHFA's sale of mortgage revenue bonds will be used to provide below market fmancing to low and moderate income first time home buyers. WHEREAS,MHFA will incur bond issuance expenses that would have normally been incurred by cities selling their own bonds. WHEREAS, The City's total allocation is $815,262. WHEREAS, The City will submit a proposal deposit of $8,152.62, which is 1% of the total allocation and is refunded to the City when bonds are sold by MHFA. WHEREAS, A fee charged to the City by MHFA for participating in the MCPP will be $20 for every $100,000 allocated to Eden Prairie, or$160. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that the City of Eden Prairie will participate in the MHFA's Minnesota Cities Participation Program and Authorizes the City Manager to execute the MHFA Mortgage Revenue Allotment Agreement and Program Application-Commitment Agreement. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of March 1997. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3/18/917,/, SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ITEM NO. r. lT DEPARTMENT: PRNR ITEM DESCRIPTION: Approve Bids for Staring Lake Playground Bob Lambert, Director Renovation -- 1- RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend approval of the bid proposal for the Staring Lake Playground renovation submitted by Sunram Construction, Inc. Of$219,296.75. Staff further recommends the Council reject alternate bid number 1 for the aluminum decorative fence in place of the chain link fence, and accept alternate bid number 2 to furnish and install the east connection between the playground and the amphitheatre at a bid of$9,500. BID COMPARISON: The City received three bids for the Staring Lake Playground Renovation Project. Sunram Construction, Inc. Of Corcoran, MN submitted a base bid of$219,296.75 with alternate bid number one of$6,500 and alternative bid number 2 of$9,500. Lakeland Nurseries, Inc. of Willmar, MN submitted a base bid of$258,131 with alternate bid number one of$31,056 and alternative bid number 2 of$2,400. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. of Burnsville, MN submitted a base bid of$291,588.10 with a alternate bid number one of$1,824 and an alternate bid number two of$11,000. Hansen, Thorpe, Pellinen and Olson's estimate for the base bid was $205,000. City staff's estimate for the entire project, including installation of playground equipment was $275,000 based on the $205,000 base bid estimate. The large swing set, the three slides and the preschool age equipment will be reused in this project. The major climbing equipment will have to be replaced, as it does not meet the City's new safety guidelines nor the City standards regarding accessibility of playgrounds at community parks. City staff will be receiving bids for replacement of the playground structure later this year. This project is proposed to be completed by October 1, 1997. BL:mdd Council/C 1 1 BID SUMMARY Staring Lake Park Playseape Area Eden Prairie Contract No.$037 NI ngfttettr Est. i I Suitram Const. .. #2 Lakeland Nursettles #3 Global Specialty Contractors a' No. Description Est.Qty. Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost 1 Silt Fence Erosion Control 620 Lin.Ft. $2.50 $1,550.00 $2.50 $1,550.00 $1.90 $1,178.00 $5.54 $3,434.80 2 Bituminous Removal 180 Sq.Yd. $1.00 $180.00 $5.00 $900.00 $15.00 $2,700.00 $5.50 $990.00 3 Concrete Removal 280 Sq.Yd. $2.10 $588.00 $7.00 $1,960.00 $15.00 $4,200.00 $6.65 $1,862.00 4 Grading 1 Lump Sum $10,003.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $5,330.00 $5,330.00' $24,200.00 $24,200.00 5 Common Borrow(L.V.) 1200 Cu.Yd. $5.00 $6,000.00 $6.50 $7,800.00 $8.00 $9,600.00 $12.30 $14,760.00 6 Select Topsoil Borrow(L.V.) 700 Cu,Yd. $7.00 $4,900,00 $12.00 $8,400.00 $20.00 $14,000.00 $16.55 . $11,585.30 7 Modular Concrete Retaining Walls 4650 Sq.Ft. $15.00 $69,750.00 $13.50 $62,775.00 $18.00 $83,700.00 $16.65 $77,422.50 (includes geogrid,drain tile and beckfill material) _ - I ^T- __`_._ 8--t2"PVC•SDR 35 ---- 456-----Ltn Ft.- $2600- - $9;f2U0( $250ff $11,400.00- $25.00 $11,40( $22.20 $10,123.20 9 6"PVC SDR 35(Trench Drain to T 83 Lin.Ft. $10.00 $830.00 $40.00 $3,320.00 $27.00 $2,241.0D $17.20 $1,427.60 10 12"Sump Structure(at Trench Dra 3 Each $500.00 $1,500.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 $877.00 $2,631.00, $775.00 $2,325.00 w 11 6"Riser 2 Each $300.00 $600.00 $300.00 $600.00 $595.00 $1,1904110. $525.00 $1,050.00 cD co 12 12"x 4"PVC Wyes 5 Each $120.00 $600.00 $120.00 $600.00 $163.00 $815.00 $145.00 $725.00 m 13 12'x 6"PVC Wyes 3 Each $140.00 $420.00 $120.00 $360.00 $175.00 $5250. $155.00 $465.00 co N 14 Standard Manhole 4 Each $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,191,00 $4,764.00 $1,0$55.00 $4,220.00 15 Connect to Existing Mil 1 Lump Sum $250.00 $250.00 $300.00 $300.00 $689.00 $689.0) $610.00 $610.00 N.-1 16 Trench Drain 158 Lan.Ft. $65.00 $10,270.00 $45.00 $7,110.00 $56.00 $8,848.0111 $125.00 $19,750.00 i0 17 4"Drain Tile(includes geotextile, 330 Lin.Ft. $7.50 $2,475.00 $25.00 $8,250.00 $18.00 $5,1 ' 1•! $16.10 $5,313.00 and backfill material) a 18 Concrete Steps 52 Each $150.00 $7,800.00 $136.00 $7,072.00 $106.00 $5,512.11 .15.00 $11,180.00 19 Concrete Walk 2500 Sq.Ft. $2.25 $3,625.00 $4.00 $10,000.00 $4.90 $12,25 t 1► $5.50 $13,750,00 20 Concrete Payers 1960 Sq.Ft. $10.00 $19,600.00 $7.00 $13,720.00 $5.60 $10,97,.J. $6.50 $12,740.00 z • 21 Bituminous Base Type 31 115 Ton $40.00 $4,600.00 $41.75 $4,801.25 $100.00 $11, i t ):1 $45.00 $5,175.00 '-' V1 Aggregate Base CL.5,100%crushe 320 Ton $10.00 $3,200.00 $12.30 $3,936.00 $22.00 $7,t•t ►.' $12.75 $4,080.00 23 Steel pipe Railing 410 Lin.Ft. $20.00 $8,200.00 $32.75 $13,427.50 $32.00 S13,120 i t $75.00 $30,750.00 i 24 Chain Link Fence w/o railing 390 Lin.Ft. $30.00 $11,700.00 $33.00 $12,870.00 $38.00 $14,820.00 $33.50 $13,065.00 m 25 Chain Link Fence w/raiting 290 Lin.Ft. $50.00 $14,500.00 $50.50 $14,645.00 $58.00 $16,820.00 $51.00 $14,790.00 7.1 26 Temporary Construction Fence(6') 1 Lump Sum $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,040.00 $4,040.00 $3,575.00 $3,575.00 u' 27 Remove Temporary Construction Ft 1 L .� mporary Lump Sum S1,000.00 $1,000.00, $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,380.00 $1,380.00 $1,110.00 $1,110.00, a\i 28 Remove Silt Fence Ervrlorreu trol 1 LutnpSum $800.00 $300.00 $500.00 $500.0( "$922.00 $ 22.00 $1,110.00 $1,110.00 Total cod $204,558.00 To a1 Cost $219,296.75 Ty Coet $258,131.00 Total Cori $291,588.10 o' a E CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Consent Calendar March 18, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 97.1 �V H Regulating Fees and Charges for Municipal Services Background: On the 13th day of February, 1997, City Council adopted Ordinance 5-97 amending City Code Chapter 5 by amending Section 5.45 relating to licensing of commercial lawn fertilizer applicators. The addition of a fee to Fee Resolution No. 97.1 would read as follows: 2.16A Commercial Fertilizer Applicators License: 1st vehicle Annual $50.00 Each additional vehicle Annual $25.00 Supporting Documentation: Section 5.45 of the City Code relating to commercial fertilizer applicators. Requested Action: Recommend that Council approve the Resolution Amending Resolution No. 97-1 Regulating fees and Charges for Municipal Services, Section 2.16A - Commercial Fertilizer Applicators License. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 97-1,REGULATING FEES AND CHARGES FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED that Section 3.16A, Commercial Fertilizer Applicators License be added to read as follows: 2.16A Commercial Fertilizer Applicators License: 1st vehicle annual $50.00 Each additional vehicle annual $25.00 ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on this 18th day of March, 1997. Dr. Jean Harris,Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 SECTION 5.45. COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER APPLICATORS. Subd. 1. Purpose. The City has reviewed studies and existing data to determine the current and projected water quality of various lakes within its community. The data indicate that lake water quality may be maintained and improved if the City is able to reduce the amount of phosphorous containing fertilizer entering the lakes as a result of storm water runoff or other causes. The purpose of this Section and Section 9.14 is to provide regulations which will aid the City in managing and protecting its water resources which are enjoyed by its residents and other users. Subd. 2. Definitions. For the purpose of this Section, certain terms and words are defined as follows: A. "Commercial Fertilizer Applicator"is a person who is engaged in the business of applying fertilizer for hire. B. "Fertilizer" means a substance containing one or more recognized plant nutrients that is used for its plant nutrient content and designed for use or claimed to have value in promoting plant growth. Fertilizer does not include animal and vegetable manures that are not manipulated, marl, lime, limestone, and other products exempted by Rule by the Minnesota Commissioner of Agriculture. Subd. 3. License Required. It is unlawful for any person to engage in the business of Commercial Fertilizer Applicator within the City without a license from the City. Subd. 4. Exclusions. This Section does not apply to persons who apply fertilizer for normal and ordinary farming and agricultural operations. Subd. 5. License Application Procedure. Applications for a commercial fertilizer applicator license shall, in addition to containing the information required by this Chapter, include: A. Formula. A description of the formula(s)of the fertilizer(s)proposed to be applied within the City. B. Time of Application. A time schedule for application of fertilizer(s)and identification of weather conditions acceptable for fertilizer applications. C. State Licenses. A copy of all licenses required of the applicant by the State of Minnesota regarding the application of fertilizers. Subd. 6. Conditions of License. Commercial fertilizer applicator license shall be issued subject to the following conditions: A. Random Sampling. Commercial fertilizer applicators shall permit the City to sample fertilizers to be applied within the City. The cost of analyzing fertilizer samples taken from commercial fertilizer applicators shall be paid by the commercial fertilizer applicator if the sample analysis indicates that phosphorous content exceeds the levels authorized herein. B. Possession of License. A commercial fertilizer applicator license, or a copy thereof, shall be in the possession of any person employed by a commercial fertilizer applicator when making fertilizer applications within the City. C. Possession of Product Material Safety Data Sheet. A copy of Product Material Safety Data Sheet of fertilizer used shall be in the possession of a person employed by a commercial fertilizer applicator when making fertilizer applications within the City. Source: Ordinance No. 49-96 Effective Date: 12-13-96 D. Possession of Labels. A copy of the label(s), including product chemical analysis of the fertilizer(s) to be applied shall be in the possession of a person employed by a commercial fertilizer applicator when making fertilizer applications within the City. Source: Ordinance No. 5-97 Effective Date: 2-14-97 3 E. State Regulations. Licensees shall comply with the applicable provisions of Minnesota Statutes, 1994, Chapter 18C, as amended, which is adopted by reference. F. City Regulations. Licensees shall comply with all applicable provisions of the City Code, including Section 9.14. G. Notice. At least 24 hours prior to applying fertilizer that contains phosphorus, licensees must notify City of the fertilizer application,the reason for applying phosphorus(which may be only those set forth in City Code Section 9.14), and the amount of phosphorus contained in the fertilizer to be applied. Source: Ordinance No. 49-96 Effective Date: 12-13-96 (Sections 5.46 through 5.59, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) LI Ai•or //AD-�� Owner Operated GLENN MEYERS Professional Service A 1 612/561-2227 A0\ kip _ 4 It , . ' ear Mayor Harris, 4 44 I am writingtoyou regarding CityOrdinance number 49-9 g g 6 that rpanirc, all ?ir;-n.c.0 7 commercial fertilizer applicators to also be licensed in your city, I ha""e gl�l Q no reservations whatsoever at being licensed and registered in your cif_', but I dis-- agree with being required to pay a fee for that license. Qrj We are a small, owner-operated company with a customer base of a7oroximate' IlEt 400. The Minnesota fertilizer license costs us $175,00 annually. The 1 a9; Hudson. a map book lists 259 municipalities. If each city required the $75.00 fee for 2 v�'i, <-!q as your city does, the additional cost for doing business would be $i9,z= 5.00, DS ' is, we serve 49 of those municipalities and would be looking at an +ncrc.?sed Co / dcir'g business of $3,675.00. _ . _ _ in holding a fertilizer license, we are very aware of our responsi, i{,*ie r:.., ifj Cf) our fertilizers at the appropriate rates and under the appropriate cond.-ions. +;,i7 r, a) includes avoiding impervious surfaces, potential run-off situations and kno rini +--- U 2 square footage of each lawn and proper calibration of our equipment. We aigr F-•,,- f made it our practise to use low phosphorus fertilizers and t,se ,� i for or e��ar± �r�1/er � . ha+ , ,.. :,_' yellow page ads. i feel strop I that the ro lP luti very strongly problem_m of fertilizer pollution is not 9^,nn to be improved on by charging a license fee commercial for t1 nrnma e!9 9 to c mm_rciai applicators. p,.. t . r of all households hire a lawn care company. The remain►ng 80% of homeowners are ° applying their own fertilizers and should be held accountable to the sar-e regule.ti^.is ° of -0- or low phosphorus fertilizers. This requires homeowner educati )n. t The Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture has done several studies on phosphorus poi' 'Ton, ai The Lake Harriet Watershed Study has several interesting findings regardin oho,- H ohorus pollution, including that homeowners are more apt to overappiy f'rtilizerc r For example, if their yard is 8,000 square feet and the bag of fertilizer covers Q 10,000 square feet, they will still apply `� bag. in - • f� whole Also, a ma ,. sc :rce o: E phosphorus pollution is from grass clippings and leaves left lying c' 1!'`,cervious ' UQ sip-faces, such as driveways and streets. Again, I'd like to stress that i have no argument against registerir+g rev R4inrn< �L z inept. of Agriculture ''license number with your city, and I agree with the need to t�\\ reduce pollution. I do believe requiring a separate license fee for each ,:ity will 1/()1�\ : not do anything but make it more difficult for responsible lawn care corn^antes, ` such as myself, to continue to do business. i i‘,,,,N.1 \ _ Al \(( - "---**:.:i.i.,84. ,, Sincerely, 1���.�0 Li \Nhi4i � � �� Glenn Meyers 111 Si i,.� �I 1rilk._---L___ 7211 Dallas Road, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 tt in. , .,i /r ea.� , . ' ,, ��,„, -4',;;,/ ,, )���� A�/t'/( "�������� (� lv Y� �'�1���J�i� LICENSED COMMERCIAL AND NONCOMMERCIAL PESTICIDE APPLICATORS `` Numbers of applicators, by county, licensed in category E,turf and ornamental. . 0 1 . 0 11.010101 -- r�.r 1 �...r..Wm. Mill r 0 a. Li....:1>.r .a,r '"; 2 UM our 2 18 I ir.i • 1 „ 1 56 4 6 I 32 4 MO I Mew Caw VA, I 2 0 5 2 12 19 r r w. ow o.�r.. r 1 """ 19 r r. 3 2 14 6 2 1 (rip . Team Pawn P.P. am. Swim • 1140111:"" �16 12, 32. o�— u.w... 15 5 32 ,,.w„ 5 745 �� """ 320 iilw....... 1 12 8 43 '1 0 Al iiir 10 5 4 "'."' ".� 22 11111 Om Wee Varna ilml• Owl. Olftledilliii 2 47 16 16 3 69 8 6 m. .rr �... r., re.. r..r. w, FilmsM.r. 9 8 6 9 8 10 17 2 2 Data as of February 3, 1997 Total=2314 S • DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: 171 SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5404 Engineering Division Award Contract for CSAH 4/High School Entrance/Edenwood Drive Rodney W. Rue Improvements Recommended Action: Approve resolution awarding contract to Midwest Asphalt Corporation for traffic signal and roadway improvements on CSAH 4 near the Eden Prairie High School Entrance/Edenwood Drive intersection. Overview: The City Council received a 100% Petition for this project from the Eden Prairie School District and subsequently ordered the improvements and preparation of plans and specifications on March 19, 1996. The plans and specifications were approved on December 17, 1996 and the Construction Cooperative Agreement was approved on February 18, 1997. Primary Issues: We have received State Aid plan approval and are anticipating Hennepin County Board approval of the Construction Cooperative Agreement at their March 18, 1997 Board meeting. We will receive notice from Hennepin County staff on the afternoon of March 18 whether the Hennepin County Board approved the Construction Cooperative Agreement or not. If approved, we will be clear to award the contract. Financial Issues: Bids for the project were received on February 20, 1997 with five bids submitted (see attached summary sheet). The low bid of$678,920.73 is approximately 10% below the final engineer's estimate. The engineer's estimate for the project had increased to about $700,000 since the preliminary estimate was done at the time of layout approval. Furthermore, as a result of the bid and additional signal work at the intersection of CSAH 4 and Valley View Road, the City's share is now approximately $185,000. We hereby recommend award of Improvement Contract No. 96-5404 to Midwest Asphalt Corporation in the amount of$678,920.73. • CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 96-5404: CSAH 4/High School Entrance/Edenwood Drive Improvements bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by till Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with Midwest Asphalt Corporation in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of$678,920.73 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 18, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 14180 Trunk Hwy.5 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 March 11, 1997 612.937.5150 FAX 612-937-5822 Mr. Al Gray City Engineer 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 RE: C.S.A.H. 4 Reconstruction I.C. 96-5404 S.A.P. 181-020-19 Dear Mr. Gray: On Thursday, February 20, 1997 bids were received for the C.S.A.H. 4 Reconstruction. A total of five bids were received ranging from the low bid of$678,920.73 to a high of $769,672.50. The Engineer's Estimate for this work was $698,932.05. The low bidder was Midwest Asphalt Corporation of Hopkins, Minnesota. We have completed our tabulation and checking of the bid results: • Midwest Asphalt: $ 678,920.73 • Valley Paving: $ 705,588.22 • Hardrives: $ 708,023.13 • Northwest Asphalt: $ 759,140.21 • C.S. McCrossan: $ 769,672.50 • Engineer's Est.: $ 698,932.05 All bids were accompanied by the required bonds and acknowledgments and are valid proposals for the project. The plans have received all required approvals. We recommend award of the contract to the low bidder-Midwest Asphalt. Sincerely, Westwood Professional S ices,Inc. • Bruce G. Miller, P.E. Principal C:\MY DOCUMENTS\DOCUMENTS\96268-CSAH 4-V.V.RAWARD.DOC Westwood Professional Services.Inc.is an equal opportunity employer. DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: TV J" SECTION: Consent Calendar V DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Purgatory Creek Estates Jeffrey Johnson Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Purgatory Creek Estates subject to the following conditions: • Revision of street name and "Carmel Court", as it conflicts with an existing street name. • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$287.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$1,065.00 • Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$573.00 • Include drainage easements over Outlot A and lot areas below 100-year flood elevation. • Revision of plat to provide 100 feet of street frontage for Lots 1 and 7 Background: Located south of Sunnybrook Road and west of Homeward Hills Road, the plat contains 4.98 acres to be divided into seven single family lots, right-of-way dedication for street purposes and one outlot over Purgatory Creek intended to be dedicated as a gift. The preliminary plat was approved July 6, 1996 and the Developer's Agreement and Second Reading of the Rezoning was completed February 18, 1997. JJ:ssa cc: Barry and Brian Post CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF PURGATORY CREEK ESTATES WHEREAS, the plat of Purgatory Creek Estates has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Purgatory Creek Estates is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated March 11, 1997. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 18, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk Z PURGATORY CREEK ESTATES I R.T. DOC. NO. 1 = I i m C.A.IM f►PACT 1.RRIGDI Qr yp Y i ."T , -- :L MY �'�-}`--- ( --IAA-- -� 11Y r,•• -1-—• \ r -1 r 7 A\---; 1` � =+ ,� I ✓�1 -- BLOCK r/�' - v N V' 1 g = 1 �w 9 IV� e r! ° d y r B _ i - j II 7 1 I`C4' >A t r I \ .1 C� I I (� I I 1^' / O L J LI 1.. 8 i . _ (1 V , t _ JI -- --i Ix NU4 XII der ma .,{I 'Q��(J.- 4 I ' WI W I p �V [/ / 6. x51 x 0 CARMEL II COURT 1 ; '=_ __ _air _ f- i Z 1 1 I \\ 1 !,4 •/�L_trr ul��I� �� ib 1 \ / vl�Ll_{Srrvvv �• t..W Z id II�� �1 / A 1 `N(� \ T a. {'-^TA Try �` I DIJ‘ $1 1 �- i 7AIn 1 I \ 1 1 1 aft I AMr-WI-1r%AI '�• ; •1 L _I L BLOCK �1 1 L. J' 1 m ; i y� __,g___` ' I .�L�L,I I L,1.I 1 -- KM MN _ --MR-- �i /- 31 I 1 B7S.Bs If 1` N 00•0724.E I b4 m �..._ UK[OF MCI A KROER UM SUM Pi TA it 1 friSlithrY ASSURED SERINO PARS IS BASED ON 111E Z -.......`A¢ SOU1N UNE OF 15ALT O. I Ep61OED WOBEADING i ISLIMES ND..MTa1.A�YEED A9.9NED BEMNS I IB77 I ii 1 NOTE:NO YaUI T MIBO.SNOM AT MY STATUTE IM UITED LOCATION INDICA=A PLAT YONWENT I THAT NU.BE SET SI MN CIE YEM FK M TIE JL • •__ 1ECOMI G DALE OF TM PUT. 5AO NONMIENTS 9 5 SHALL SE 1/1 INCH•14 Nal NON NONWdTS NARKED NY ILLS.NO.12211. KIK A ILIT N No1R NM AMMO ME WT llik. 1INA.40 Mt SMIe1111N MIN MO AIAINRA AIOR K MY UC NO ATM 14T 30.LOWS /MGIS PPGT=MI Ili flit •DENOTES 1/2 INCH N 14 11101 NON NOOAETIT FOUND BEN04 NARK:TOP NUT OF HYDRANT N FONT OF LOTS 3 AID 4.KOOK 1 NEACON PARK JD 120110N. ELEVA1101l-1144.35 JAMS F HILL, INC. DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO:T t SECTION: Public Hearing V. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5350 Engineering Divisi, 7 Approval of Change Order No. 1 Eugene A. Dietz Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project Recommended Action: Motion to approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of$35,394 for the Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project. Background: The attachments identify the specific amounts for changes that have occurred during the past six months to the Water Plant Expansion Project. Of the total amount of changes, $27,000 is for additional soil corrections to the site. It was anticipated that additional correction work may be necessary and the contractor actually provided a unit price bid for additional correction work in the original proposal for the project. We have asked the contractor to accumulate the changes to the project and route them to Council for approval in "batches". This first change order deals primarily with initial grading on the site and items identified during the building permit process that identified changes required to meet City and State Codes. Financial Implications: Change Order No. 1 will increase the contract by 0.18%. On a project of this size and complexity, we would expect change orders in the 1% to 2% range. Additional changes to the contract are currently in progress and will be routed to the City Council at appropriate intervals. These additional costs will be part of the permanent financing plan for the Plant Expansion Project. f BLACK&VEATCH 8400 Ward Parkway, P.O.Box No. 8405, Kansas City,Missouri 64114, (913)458-2000 Eden Prairie, Minnesota B&V Project 26014.400 Water Treatment Plant Improvements B&V File G-1.0 February 21, 1997 Mr. Gene Dietz Director of Public Works City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Subject: Change Order No. 1 Dear Gene: Enclosed are four copies of Change Order No. 1 for the Water Treatment Plant Improvements project. The following is a brief description of each item included in the change order: Soil Correction Elevations. The extent of unsuitable soils resulting from the pond and wetlands that once occupied the site could only be approximated from the soil borings. Therefore, the Contract Documents included an adjustment unit price for the difference between the approximated and actual volume of unsuitable soil removed. An additional 2,250 cubic yards of unsuitable soil had to be removed below the building foundations and replaced with engineered fill . The adjustment unit price as provided in the Bid Form was $12.00 per cubic yard, resulting in a total increase of $27,000. Building Code Requirements. Several modifications were required as a result of the building code review. These modifications resulted in an increase of $10,423. a. Doors D126 and D228 shall be revised from single active leaf type to double egress type. b. Chlorine storage room construction shall be revised to conform to UBC Division H-2 occupancy by utilizing light weight concrete masonry units as specified to obtain a 2 hour fire rating and by providing rolling steel fire shutters on the windows. c. The length of handicap water closet partitions shall be revised from 5'-0" to 6'-2" in Rooms 108, 109, 122, and 123. d. The Zone 1 fire suppression system shall be extended to include the paint storage room (Room 138) . Page 2 Mr. Gene Dietz B&V Project 26014.400 February 21, 1997 Roof Drain Piping Material . Hubless cast iron pipe can serve the same function as ductile iron pipe for 8 and 10 inch roof drain piping at a lower cost. This modification results in a decrease in the Contract Price of $2,029. Items Which Do Not Change the Contract Price. Several items were modified that have no impact on the Contract Price. a. At the request of the Contractor to facilitate construction, the top elevation of the footing near columns A.5-5 and B-5 was lowered from Elev 853.00 to Elev 851.00. b. As proposed by the Contractor and accepted by the City's staff, manhole rungs will be changed from cast iron to steel reinforced plastic. c. The equipment manufacturer for the CCTV surveillance system shall be changed from Burle (as listed in the Questionnaire) to Panasonic in order to take advantage of the superior tilt and panarama/sweep features. We have evaluated the proposed changes and the cost associated with these modifications and they appear to be reasonable. Therefore, we recommend that Change Order No. 1 be submitted to the City Council for approval . If the change order is acceptable, Knutson's representative can come by your office to sign the change order for submittal to the City Council . Once fully executed, please return three signed copies. We will forward two copies to Knutson for their files and for their Surety. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, BLACK & VEATCH David J. arlson dms Enclosures cc: Ed Sorensen Jim Nelon CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 94-5350 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 A. SCOPE This Change Order No. 1 covers the following items: 1. Soil Correction Excavation An adjustment unit price (increase or decrease) to the contract was included in the bid requirements for the removal of unsuitable soils (layers of peat and loose sand) below the building foundations and replacement with engineered fill . This unit price was necessary since the extent of unsuitable soils resulting from the pond and wetlands that once occupied the site could only be approximated from the soil borings. Prior to foundation construction, additional unsuitable soil had to be removed from the foot print of the new structures to provide suitable bearing conditions. An additional 2,250 cubic yards of unsuitable soil had to be removed. The adjustment unit price as provided in the Bid Form was $12.00 per cubic yard resulting in the total increase in the project cost. Add $27.000.00 2. Revise Doors D126 and D228 to Double Egress Type Based on the requirements of the building code review, Doors D126 and D228 were revised from single active leaf type to double egress type. The current active leaf remained active in the direction shown on the drawings. The other leaf shall be active in the opposite direction. Door hardware and double egress frames shall be provided for both doors with the leaves centered in the frame and aligned at the center. Frame depth shall be 6 inches with a 2 inch minimum return. 1 `t The hardware for each door shall be as follows: Item No. Required Catalog No. Door D126 Butts 8 FBB179-626 4-1/2" X 4-1/2" Closer 2 4040-CUSH Exit Device 2 9947E0-630 Kick Plate 2 2001-10" X 32" -630 Silencers 2 GJ64 Door D228 Butts 6 FB8179-626 4-1/2" X 4-1/2" Closer 2 4040-CUSH Exit Device 2 9947E0-630 Kick Plate 2 2001-10" X 32" -630 Silencers 2 GJ64 Add $2,967.00 3. Chlorine Storage Room Modifications Based on requirements of the building code review, the chlorine storage room construction shall be revised to conform to UBC Division H-2 occupancy with the following modifications. a. The masonry walls located along column row 4 between column rows S and X and along column row S between column rows 2.2 and 4 shall be light weight concrete masonry units (as specified) with a 2 hour fire rating in accordance with the UBC. b. One and one-half hour fire rated rolling steel fire shutters for Windows W110 and W111 shall be provided in accordance with the following shutter specifications: Rolling shutters shall be Class B, 1 1/2 hour fire shutters similar to Cookson FD10-1M or Kinnear Model FM- AT.L. Fire Shutters shall be designed to remain in open position normally and to close automatically by fusing of a link attached to an automatic release mechanism. 2 S Shutters shall be mounted on the face of the wall in Room 139 with suitable access to the mechanism. Rolling steel fire shutters shall be complete with all necessary guides, hardware, anchors, mechanisms, and accessories. Shutters shall bear the Underwriters' Laboratory label . Curtain slats, hood, and bottom rails of rolling steel fire shutters shall be galvanized and shop primed. All other exposed metal parts of the shutters and accessories, except bearings, chains, and fusible linkage, shall be shop primed. Galvanizing shall comply with ASTM A526 for commercial steel sheets and ASTM A386 for assembled steel products. Galvanized surfaces shall be phosphatized before painting. Add $4,353.00 4. Water Closet Partition Modification Based on the requirements of the building code review, the handicap water closet partitions shall be revised to comply with the 1996 Minnesota State Building Code (which was issued after design of this area was complete) by increasing the length of the partitions from 5'-0" to 6'-2" in Rooms 108, 109, 122, and 123. The other water closet partitions will remain unchanged. Add $946.00 5. Extend the Fire Suppression System Based on the requirements of the building code review, the Zone 1 fire suppression system shall be extended to include the paint storage room (Room 138) . The fire suppression system classification will be "Extra Hazardous Group 1" with a sprinkler density of 0.3 gpm/sf. Add $2,157.00 3 (D 6. Footing Modification to Avoid 30" Wash Water Drain At the request of the Contractor to facilitate construction, the top elevatation of the footing near columns A.5-5 and B- 5, was lowered from Elev 853.00 to Elev 851.00. No Change 7. Manhole Rungs As proposed by the Contractor and accepted by the City's staff, manholes rungs were changed from cast iron to steel reinforced plastic. No Change 8. Roof Drain Piping Material Due to the current availability of hubless cast iron pipe and its equivalency to ductile iron pipe at a lower cost, hubless cast iron pipe shall be provided in lieu of ductile iron pipe for 8 and 10 inch roof drain piping. Deduct $2,029.00 9. CCTV Surveillance System The equipment manufacturer for the CCTV surveillance system shall be changed from Burle (as listed in the Questionnaire) to Panasonic in order to take advantage of superior tilt and panarama/sweep features. No Change B. EFFECT ON CONTRACT AMOUNT As a result of this Change Order No. 1, the contract amount will be increased by $35,394.00. C. EFFECT ON CONTRACT TIME As a result of this Change Order No. 1, the contract time shall remain unchanged. 4 D. OTHER CONTRACT PROVISIONS Except as otherwise provided herein, it is understood and agreed that all other provisions of the contract remain unchanged. The Contractor hereby waives and releases all claims, known or unknown, for costs (whether direct or indirect) , delays, impacts, escalation, subcontractor or supplier costs, or any other damages or time extensions whatsoever, which could have been claimed or associated with the work as described in Paragraph A above. E. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT AMOUNT CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDERS ADJUSTMENT Original Contract $20,204,000.00 Change Order No. 1 $ 35,394.00 Adjusted Contract Amount $20,239,394.00 F. ACCEPTANCE The change and conditions set forth in the above Change Order No. 1 are hereby accepted. This Change Order No. 1 will be effective on OWNER:City of Eden Prairie, MN CONTRACTOR: Knutson Construction Co. By: By: Dr. Jean L. Harris Title: Mayor Title: By: Carl J. Jullie Title: City Manager 5 DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: V i9 SECTION: Public Hearing r DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5363 Engineering Division Sunnybrook Road - Order Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Alan D. Gray Specifications Recommended Action: Adopt resolution ordering preparation of plans and specifications for Sunnybrook improvements designated I.C. 94-5363. Overview: The first public heariiigt for the improvement of this section of Sunnybrook Road was conducted in 1995. The project did not proceed to construction in 1995 or 1996 for lack of an easement required for storm sewer discharging to Purgatory Creek and sanitary sewer connecting to the intercepter adjacent to Purgatory Creek. A corridor is now available through the recently approved residential subdivision on the Post Construction site. Post Construction has also petitioned for their utility and street improvements to be combined with the Sunnybrook Road project. Due to the time elapsed since 1995, and to the changes in scope of the project, the feasibility study has been amended and the preliminary hearing redone. Property owners to whom assessments are proposed have received a copy of the Addendum to the Feasibility Study and a informational meeting will be conducted by City staff on March 11. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 18th day of February, 1997, fixed the • 18th day of March, 1997, as the date for public hearing on the following proposed improvements: I.C. 94-5363: Sunnybrook Road Street and Utility Improvements WHEREAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed for the making of this improvement were given ten days published notice of the Council hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice and the hearing was held and property owners heard on the 18th day of March, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: 1. Such improvement as above indicated is hereby ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this project and is hereby directed to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement with the assistance of RCM, Inc. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 18, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, Clerk 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER RENOVATION 1997 Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 9.46 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the C-COM Zoning District on 9.46 acres; • Adopt a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 9.46 acres; Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its March 10, 1997 meeting. The proposal is a "face lift" of the development and a regrading of the parking lot and frontage road for better visibility to the site. The proponent has worked with City staff,the County, and State regarding the grading of the frontage road. All parties agree with the proposal and the developer has agreed to pay for all changes associated with this regrading. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Staff Report dated March 7, 1997 3. Plans dated March 7, 1997 PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER RENOVATION 1997 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF PRESERVE VILLAGE CENTER RENOVATION 1997 FOR JERRY'S ENTERPRISES,INC. WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 PUD Concept by Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. and considered their request for approval for development (and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on March 18, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated March 7, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated March 10, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2- Exhibit A Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 Legal Description: Outlot E, GARRISON FOREST SECOND ADDITION, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,Minnesota, except the following described property: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Outlot E, thence run westerly along the southerly line thereof on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 40 minutes 54 second West for a distance of.73 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence North 0 degrees 25 minutes 47 seconds West for 395.94 feet;thence deflect left along a tangential curve having a radius of 110.00 feet, delta angle of 76 degrees 55 minutes 26 seconds, for 147.68 feet; thence North 77 degrees 21 minutes 13 seconds West for 200.22 feet;thence deflect right along a tangential curve having a radius of 140.00 feet for 180.00 feet and said line there terminating. 3 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen City Planner DATE: March 7, 1997 SUBJECT: Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 APPLICANT: Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. LOCATION: Anderson Lakes Parkway and C.S.A.H. 18 REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Concept Review on 9.46 acres 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 9.46 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment within the C-COM Zoning District on 9.46 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres. 1 4. _ , , ,_iir7 . _ . . •::.1 ,.\. . . .r.71::::.:::. ...,. i . . , I ' s.i. ' ::( ': •• : . : "• • '‘.. ..•: z ..! \ (.41 •.• N / ,••'..`t.••• , ;..`'' ••.-\ .. i a 1 . • .1• .1 :• :. - .:: -: . .c' • . . . I . . t . ::II. . • Ni 00 .c : :- cyL")•: .:.i :.- .•. •,‘: . / ......• •1 ' .. . i , it.... 4sic...r•- 9E141*(31 \ t . :•. . . • = •j :• • :5 :f) A! HY..'..% ::.. •1:. . •• - . (q;;,'-4 Er- doe .;1__, HIOOE WV •.•I .. : :::1 : ::i •."- • .: :- - • .: ::•::: '::i:•.::: . : • , _ -,- .: . • -..::•" : • -.: • : : :••• 3 •:j: :•: : pJ1 IC041 4,.4. OAK . . .• ): • ' .-•:• /. : . ' •:: : : 1: ::: .: : 1::::. -: l • .• • -0 gic:),), oFtivE ,-,-.. , : .,.: • ::::: :iH. . : : .: • : ,. :. . \.:/. .:. • •.•.• .:::•:: ••:• ... ::. • :: .• . •- :: .• . • •.• . . . . . . .... .. •. ... ...... . ,.. : :/:: : : : : :H : :::: :: :•. :. ,L. : : :: ..?.::•• ,r1111:z., t.,:. . . . .r•• ti:• .. ..:E: . . .. (.• .•. . . . . At z WI, ON Ilir V-.. c's 0 • . . . .•.-. le • . • • • • " • ..... ss, -:-::: t:•: :: 2: : :!:::: :::ii: ::::::.•, e. . I, •i . .,. .. • ..kc.,„... 4111,- !::::.: A.: : ::: • • ••:•.. H::: :\ .. •:: : :::H:-::... : ' ...;!• ' 0 1;-,„ C) . .. ci -::::: I .:.• :...1 . • : • •.: : •. . . . . . C.,\C°' .‘, - • '-`-...: 3 . : .). (.2.-.. ('._ .• S# . ._._. ;.... \ ' -, \ .i: ) 1'c'Cf4,- 91)- • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. i . , . . ..., C1RC'...E ,-3 I . 1-------,r• ,_,/ \ S -,-If ...... . -•?0 ..".1 \ 1S. VN • 1-1-!c -p 0 ,..4,0, '----r--• . . . , ill -1---‘-j-r- z ....- r1 a i . \,-1. ..... ./. • ciocLE 7.,. . .2, . ____ . R KWAY I • . . . • 1:.•,- 1 ' / • . . . r--- , \\_. .. ,,. . . I .• _, ;okss , . . . . : . . •... . . • . . •-•1-• › .. ),, \ \ Pr..' - • 0 ,-. '55., .--1 Cl . , -0 ''......:-I.I.;E ' - cc :;(7 \ iI / Az) _ . ... n1 ,. . ?, 1 :......I I-7% : -:t‘rt r---i., '7 ..- . • . =..1 • Z. 4.: \I C-72, -A . 73 A . . , • . . < . • • • • • • ' 7- \ / f , i1 ;t) ,. 74.•;'.. .., , % . . 177 R...asitil\iiiiiveed74, , LL.Ji, ' N•t _. • .. / /i ....-:;.• VP / , . - _ . , I c, 411011111 •I • , 1 1 \ ' ' 21 l I r u,s1 -t. 44f • -7 71 4# - ... .. e f•-• :,.!: e3 G. ..- 1 t / se:).. V- WAY ' , A ',.1::4..::2- 1 • I 1 i..1:-I' "-1' • 2 I.-..---F-7--.- --.--.-'- # ! <7 l• :-.4 ••• •,..„, 57....! 1 1 , .,,•r,, ! r1."-----. feg -4, 32X i 1 • 'Cr'S? 1 .-•:....;;;IT , , r-A-,-• • \Ce'%' 1........\•:-:!:i:4:_j. ,. .,.. ...,,:l /cr.: ... ,\4 SUMAC • • o -./.1 CIRCLE---, , ft. ar lip .: • ' 10 ;.:1: 31 C•J /..;::•• — 1 1 LANE AIM 0 I.Yk4 p I c CIR. \ 4.,•-• • cci . LA\') 7 • .731 , J C - r- 6 -- ...........,.... zl .! , r-f. • 1 -,ei r,. - Mg ..,- -\ Lu .'s-7.-1•4' ,,..0 .__ (:?:5> Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 Staff Report March 7, 1997 BACKGROUND This site was previously zoned Community Commercial in 1979 for the existing retail shopping center. In 1996, the City approved a mall renovation by Semper Holdings that included tearing down the north end of the building (24,000 square feet) currently occupied by Rexall Drug, Ben Franklin's and the hardware store and constructing a 13,905 square foot free-standing Walgreen's. CURRENT PROPOSAL The plan is to remodeling the interior and improve the exterior building elevations. The access into the mall changes due to highway , service road and Anderson Lakes Parkway reconstruction. The plan also includes a reconstruction of the front parking lot and new parking in the back of the building. SITE PLAN The amount of parking required is six parking spaces per 1,000 square feet or 467 spaces.The 1978 developers agreement granted a parking waiver to 5.78 spaces per 1,000 or 450 spaces. The site plan shows 443 spaces. There is room along the frontage road to construct additional 24 spaces ,if needed, to meet City Code or the existing agreement.. The project requires a building setback waiver for the northeast corner of the building from 35 to 30 feet. The waiver is due to road reconstruction. Staff supports the waiver. The project requires a parking setback waiver from 17.5 feet to 0 feet along the north side of the building. There is excess right of way . The amount of green area between the road and parking exceeds the City Code. Plantings in right of way, approved by Mndot, screens parking. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches, screening of parking, and screening of loading. The caliper inch requirement is 243 inches. The plan meets this requirement. Parking is screened with landscaping. The loading area is screened by the building and the existing fence. 2 LP Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 Staff Report March 7, 1997 ARCHITECTURE The building meets the brick and glass requirement of the City code.. The brick will match the existing face brick on the shopping center. All mechanical equipment on the roof will be screened by a metal panels. ACCESS Until Anderson Lakes Parkway is realigned, access into this site will not change from its current configuration. After the realignment, access will be a right-in only and two full driveways off of the new C.S.A.H. 18 frontage road. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The front parking lot will be regraded and lowered. This will change road alignment, road grades and storm sewer in the approved frontage road plan. This will require approval by Hennepin County. The developer will be responsible for the cost of these changes. UTILITIES There are existing utilities on the property for sanitary sewer and water connections. Additional catch basins will be installed for the collection of storm water. The City requires treatment of storm water before leaving the site. Since most of the shopping center was built prior to current NURP standards, staff suggests that a cash equivalent contribution to the storm water utility fund be required. The cash contribution is calculated based on 2% of the land cost and$1,000 per acre for impervious surface payable at time of building permit issuance. SIGNS This site is permitted to have three pylon signs provided that they are 300 feet apart. The size of the signs shall not exceed 80 square feet for one, and 36 square feet for the other two. The maximum height is 20 feet. Sign locations are shown on the plans. Tenant wall signs are permitted on the exterior elevation of the building. The sign plan shows permitted exterior wall signs for tenants with exterior walls, and interior tenants which are not allowed by City code. A 1991 variance allowed interior tenants to have exterior signs. The approved plan(including exterior and interior signs)was 14, 2'x 12' signs, with 14" letters. The new sign plan Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 Staff Report March 7, 1997 has 19 signs, 2' x 10', with 12" letters. Two of these signs are permitted exterior signs for new tenants on the north side of the building. Two other signs are new interior tenants. The 17 signs occupy the same area as the approved plan. Staff supports the new sign plan, since it is the same size as the 1991 approval and the signs are part of an architecturally defined sign band. Without an architectural separation between signs, the signs would look cluttered and detract from the buildings exterior. LIGHTING The existing parking lot lighting will be replaced with bronze, 25 foot high, downcast, cut-off luminars. PEDESTRIAN SYSTEMS With the road realignment, an 8 foot bituminous trail will be constructed on the west side of the C.S.A.H. 18 frontage road. There is a connection to the northeast corner of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends approval of the PUD Development Concept and PUD District Review,Zoning District Amendment within the C-COM Zoning District on 9.46 acres, and Site Plan Review on 9.46 acres based upon revised plans dated March 7, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated March 7, 1997 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior grading permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. 2. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Submit a final landscape plan and security to cover the cost of the landscaping for review and approval by the City. B. Submit final plans for review and approval by the Fire Marshal. 4 Preserve Village Center Renovation 1997 Staff Report March 7, 1997 C. Submit samples of exterior materials and colors for review and approval by the City. 3. Concurrent with building permit issuance,proponent shall pay a NURP pond fee based on 2% of the land cost and$1,000 per acre for impervious surface. 4. The developer is responsible for the cost of changes in road alignment,road grades and storm sewer to the approved frontage road plan. 5 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. UC. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Park District on 4.96 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 7.21 acres into one lot. Background: At the February 24, 1997 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project. Supporting Reports: Resolution for Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Minutes dated 2-24-97 Staff Report dated 2-24-97 Correspondence Plans dated March 11, 1997 PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE FOR FOUR S. PROPERTIES INC. BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Prairie Green Mini-Storage for Four S. Properties Inc. dated March 11, 1997, consisting of 7.21 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2- Exhibit A Prairie Green Mini-Storage Legal Description: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Birchwood Labs, embraced within the South one—fourth of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 116, Range 22, according to the plat thereof on file or of record In the office of the Registrar of Titles In and for said County. Lot 1, Block 1, Birchwood Labs except that part embraced within the South one—fourth of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 116, Range 22, according to the recorded plot thereof, and situate In Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 2, Block 1, Birchwood Labs, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. S Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 C. PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE by Four S. Properties Inc. Request for Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Park District on 4.96 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.96 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.21 acres into one lot. Location: County Road 4, south of Terrey Pine Court. Todd Jones, Four S Properties, said the request for the preliminary plat is simply to combine the existing two lots into one lot. He reviewed the staff report and agreed with the recommendations for approval. Ismail asked what outdoor recreation vehicles are. Jones replied they are RV's, recreation vehicles; boats, and some cars. It is open space so it's a parking area that's striped. They actually rent storage spaces. They plow the area so all of the vehicles can go in and out. Staff recommended approval according to the recommendations on page 3 and 4 of the staff report. The public hearing was opened. Ismail asked if there were any neighbor concerns. Jones replied there is one residential use to the south of the property and they have taken efforts in planting trees to make sure they would not have a view of this. Kardell commented she lives across the street from the property and shares a space there. It's a well kept up facility and is well screened. She supported the project. Habicht said he drove around County Road 4 and the recreational vehicles were well out of sight. He supported the project. MOTION 1: Kardell moved, seconded by Foote, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Kardell moved, seconded by Foote,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Four S. Properties, Inc. for Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Park District on 4.96 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.96 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.21 acres into one lot based on plans dated January 10 and 31, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the StaffReport dated February 21, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. 7 Lj STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D.Franzen, City Planner DATE: February 24, 1997 SUBJECT: PRAIRIE GREEN MINI-STORAGE EXPANSION APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Four S Properties/Birchwood Labs LOCATION: East of County Road 4, South of Terrey Pine Drive REQUEST: 1. Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Park District on 4.96 acres. 2. Preliminary Plat of 7.21 acres into one lot. 3. Site Plan Review on 4.96 acres. S ,:•••••••-•-:•:•••. ..-. ...a..-...i ........ .. ,N: I : '---t---1 LI r t— ul i i i t/ rNvAI • • -::• i:- .Z:.../:••:::::•:•:::.:: • --1V: / , F F ,:t•-er I5.V ER•:H:H:H: f•4 :.:•: H:: V:i: : .-• - , • • •••• • • • •••.• • . k , , I ,4:-.;:+. RO. 1 ::•if..0; a:.:. :•'--:::::::-:•:• • - . Hi:..,.•• ::: ":' . •::: ::::.4::,:it: " ' i. I I I--Z..?•-1 I Vigli-aATE jAThi-g,t7-", r.:H: .:'i... .'.* "...::*•':' . .. .. , . . -:•••:•:•••• • :• •••••• ,-er. .•:•: .:*;i1•:::: :: .•; l.:.•:. 1.115i:-::** _____cutati__„\ '---' i •:: ::::::.,•,:.•..:.:::::-• _ w:57iT4z 1_ --\• •::: :'::::••:- 1 ------• V.411,11615/111111111M1111.11101 .\11 ' .:,,, ...., ' Ihr No aim.. 1 ' -r f:'::Cch•7-.., I'1 1 i 1141ipm gm , O 1.1111_ li —1 • moili 4111 I r 1 S8e..pc+4 1 AVENUE rI \ mict,:.,.. _ IIIII ----,--c, 14r#Ai•:41i „A,,o h,.,-.....,,,,,-,.; I vow 11111 17•Rik;RIE i 5711 .-.;.,, , , c Yi.A.G ••r•' •.'a-C.% 11111 to Vi!..i..;A:.;E '..' 4 • • .::'... q‘o‘::-.' 'S •• • ".".• • ••• . -IH-' - , . hi;••LIED s*:,/ ' ..0.Pi:O.:..--,...... ..• .:;:-:.:•' •• a '—'7"---' .,••••,- ? ,, ;!:.. .: , •sr, -..., n-rii:: El.:4•._ : f - \ :..:, ..:.:::: ::•:•:::: : ::•:•.-..•. . . . . . .. cjI • c; 0 O !4.•„:"..:41;,:,, ......,•:•• .-::::::::::::.:::::: :i:::i:i:H: :: :: < pINE RIVs; Cl" 16 I. :::::::H: :•'' :.::::•::::: ::::'• :H:H::: ::::. /7 [ •:H:H:::.: • • . . . . '' '•:-:•:•: :•:•:••••••• :::::. r 1 ' 1 S1.4.-- ta1694..1 Uhl , . . ••::::.::::::::;::: ::::::: ::: ::Ipat A -.• .. .Z. .:: ::::14.....0 or.:.. iii A.P .::.:::;:ii::.:•: •:::::::::i:Mi 7,:',1'..;ii-:-..:-.':::_,3 46: ..:.:.:...... i IF I:::.: :...: It-• a* . # - 3F *-----" :'''. '.'.. •:::::: : '.`i-..'•ii". BAr' — !....Af.-!5; ,Aii„, 4,16 .4'. ::•:::::: - • " " • - _ •...•.•.• •:::::::::::::• -44,r*, 1 .004 ..,741 ... ...... .. ............. , „, ,„„„•,„,, ,...-.•:„,„„:.:..e. • • ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ..:.:.:. v:.. ....:... , ...,„:,..)7z, :Am . , . 4 N p it A I * IA .....•... ...•.•. •:•:•:% 111116',;4116. •:•:•:•:• Ar.ii.:+:'7 .0. lillpi.:: •:i.::i:• r:: :: •:: ]: iii.:. ‘-...-.t* q72;•-• 1 •!.;.1.:.i :: ;::.: :.i i-;i •,•-••••6•-i‘ )ca. .: Loci ),,v_,:l..., 1 ii , .: i :e.:. :4i .:::...,.::.-..*::. :.•:::::.: ' l" •' Q.)-7 2 i3:3,eI / ,...,,„Rie\___ i•:::.:i::::::::::::•::: ::.*:,.. \ , frAiRi< • ..• .:: ::.: ::.::.::::.:::•:•:•: i •••... :::::::::::::::•• --IL ..... ,.• ... 4ffa:Fir.:,. / - a:con A,.;:..), •••• •••• :.........- CIM •.•.•.•. . . ,..._:0 N% illit::::::::::: .•••••••••• _...-, ' :•:S• ;— r . - . 7 c:Ik PARK wAY / I mtLLER _ . PARX viA7 ./ i /, 1:•:.111.111111:::-::ta , Z . . . • •._• . . • • •..-.- -_-1 . . . . .• • .•.•.• .•.•.•,... . :jC:4 :..:.• .:-.:;::-...:. 0 4L- - • • • - • • • • • . • • • • .• • • • . . , . ,•.. . :::.;::.::: :, "::*. Er • ilr/e42 :•:.•:•:•:•. •:•:•:•:•::. 4 3RI'tp. R,7D On- 1//.4. • Staff Report Prairie Green Mini-Storage February 24, 1997 BACKGROUND This property is guided Industrial. The property is currently zoned I-2 Park Industrial. SITE PLAN The site plan shows an expansion to the existing mini-storage facility. There are four buildings totaling 79,680 sq. ft.. The base area ratio is .29. The floor area ratio is .40. The City Code allows a .3 base area ratio and a .5 floor area ratio. The buildings meet the required setbacks to property lines. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Approximately one acre of land is future development at the intersection of County Road 4 and Terrey Pine Drive. There are no plans for development at this time. This property is guided and zoned IndustriaL An expansion of the mini-storage,assembly,manufacturing, office and warehouse are permitted uses. A site plan review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council is required before this portion of the property can develop. ACCESS The expansion area shares the existing access with the mini-storage facility to the south. Access is also possible to Terrey Pine Drive. Hennepin County needs additional right of way for County Road 4 reconstruction and a bikeway. The project is expected to start this fall and will take approximately two years to complete. ARCHITECTURE The building is proposed to be constructed of rock face block and metal panel meeting the requirements of the Industrial Zoning District. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available to the property. Storm water runoff will drain into a water quality pond in the northeast corner of the property. LANDSCAPING 2 Staff Report Prairie Green Mini-Storage February 24, 1997 The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches per square foot of building, tree replacement, screening of parking areas, screening of loading areas, and transition to adjoining properties. The landscape plan provides the required 239 caliper inches. There are 101 inches of significant trees on the property. A total of 78 inches would be lost due to construction. Tree replacement is 104 inches. The landscape plan shows 104 inches. Parking and loading areas are screened from County Road 4 by Building B and a change in grade. See site line section A-A on sheet A-3.1. There are existing residential land uses west of County Road 4 and south of the property. Site section line A-A shows that the building and landscaping screens the loading areas from existing residential west of County Road 4. Site line B-B shows the relationship between the existing single family home to the south and the proposed outdoor storage of recreational vehicles. The change in grade,retaining wall, and trees screens views. VARIANCE FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES In the southeast corner of the property outdoor storage for 16 recreational vehicles is proposed. Outdoor storage of recreational vehicles requires a variance to be reviewed and approved by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Reasons to consider the outdoor storage of recreational vehicles are as follows: 1. The amount of outdoor storage is small. 2. The outdoor storage area is not visible from the adjoining home to the south. 3. The outdoor storage is not visible from County Road 4. RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Park District on 4.96 acres, Site Plan Review on 4.96 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 7.21 acres into one lot based on plans dated February 21, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 24, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 3. • Staff Report Prairie Green Mini-Storage February 24, 1997 1. Prior to final plat approval,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3. Prior to grading,the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and City Forester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. The proponent shall apply for and receive approval of a variance for outdoor storage of recreational vehicles from the Board of Appeals and Adjustments: prairie.gr 4 9 Hennepin Count An Equal Opportunity Employer ) uncs NI. Bourcy, County Administrator February 12, 1997 Mr. Mike ranzen, Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: PROPOSED SITE PLAN REVIEW - PRAIRIE GREEN STORAGE CSAH 4 Section 17, Township 116, Range 22 Hennepin County Review No. 2381 Review and Recommendations Dear Mike: Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require county review of proposed plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plan and make the following comments: • The developer should dedicate enough additional right of way to accommodate the relocated path and the reconstruction of CSAH 4 to a four lane divided road with bikeway as proposed under county project no. 9016. For detail questions please contact Craig Twinem, Design Engineer at 930-2536. • All access must be via the existing mini-storage driveway and/or Terry Pine Drive. No other access will be permitted. • All proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to access drainage and utility construction, trail development and landscaping. Contact our Permits Section at 930-2550 for the appropriate permit forms. • The developer must restore all areas, within the county right of way, disturbed during construction. Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at 930-2548. As a matter of procedure, we request that the City Clerk inform us of the City Council 's action on the right of way and access provisions. S�e�,J Thomas D. J son, P.E. cc: Pete Tulkki Transports ion Planning Engineer Dave Swenson TDJ/DKZ/jh Department of Public Works Craig Twinem 320 Washington Avenue South Recycled Paper Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8496 (612)930-2500 FAX:(612)930-2513 TDD:(612)930-2696 10 3. IT. I \ , 77i3.::. s�i I TIMBER LAKE DR. NORTN 1 'fii' j • _` �� :I: ' I, (,---t-1- --.----141: !:IMP 7800 / ' 25 50 100 :b at ' /` \ \ "l I • -� 1� m +ZiY'v SCALE w�e �- - l („_. gat � 1 ti.; 1 - ji:l ,•,� ' �� J r� 't -: I •: t 1 I I � `- Sa.,„ - • W it - - Cr 1 SAWCUT tl I i) � - � I 7924 ma V�,y{` iri ¢ II 9 0 J .� I� Zlji7820 ��.!'� -_ CON,....„ %).STRUCTION LIMITS I 0r, 'r m.... ,_o„, - � , .- 7.0 ....f•�� .—��` --"- ___ :____.. ....„,,,..,,, _ .__,:____ . ,, ,_ .„..,,,_,,,„ .......____ ---___________ , r -- ......o dl' 1(Si IA O'==,e-��..� ���� x 135+00 `` � cn is• � .r- _T _ i'' i �_ ��//// '�� :' 133+0o elr.'sAwcuT I D ,/ ////� �'!////VV � _- -= --" ,c a� alr. sAwcruT 'i el- 16345 ,, _—'���11// � „ // -.dam- - _ _ -- -I _ ' r+�_ BIT. SAWCUT fj� CONSTRUKTION 1M1T5 r __ - -' F-/"• ```I n 7921 MY ,tro. 4,:.$,*.; , . „, , .......„.„.. ....,,_.. ._ ._ ... ....,,_;._,.....;,...._.:44,, ;` 'EMOVAL PLAN \ H .....___.,._ n \ �= +�I u,', 'LAN CONSTRUCTION I 0 TIMBER LAKE DR. NORTH _ W I .1 1 \ , i �' I 9+00,MATCH EXISTING I W ` I +50,END WALL 812 I MATCH E%ISTING F-- _ 8612 CkC - - CONCRETE CdcG I ___ -/ONSTRUCTN LIMITS I____ Ill +00,BEGIN WALL#12 1 _ _ -��---`//.._�� , n I -- 1:1 � ; ////////_��/��/�//!/r�-__� �1 C.S.A.H. .4�33t91 END SP 27-604-12 iff> — _ _ +40 --- _7- �` D Mil8624 CkG� _ - -'/I//- ~—_:�- MATCH EXISTING QJ ir�,.___ i'�////��/_/���-�}I- CONCRETE C&G _ I IJL%%//�����Ls +65,END 3.5 CONC.WALK O NOTES IQI I 10'TRANSITION FROM 8624 TO +50,ENO WALL 1111 I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 8612,PAID AS 8624 : II)5' TRANSITION FROM 8624 TO D612,PAID AS 8624 T i I ©ALL MEDIAN STATIONS ARE BASED ON NORTH BOUND ALIGNMENTS. S.P. N0. 27-604-12 CERTIFIED BY Pg0FE54p•AL KRONUR REC.NO. DATE I HENN. CO., MINN. C,S,A.H, NO. 4 PROJ. NO, EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. 0. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger CENTRON DPL Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Zoning District on 5 acres and PUD District Review on 5 acres with a waiver to allow 75%office use; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 5 acres. Background: At the February 24, 1997 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project with a waiver to allow 75% office use on land that is zoned industrial. The Planning Commission supported the waiver since there was enough parking and the project is designed to office standards. The staff report recommendation is based on a 55%office use, since that was the initial request of Centron. At the meeting Centron amended the waiver request to 75%office. Supporting Reports: Resolution for PUD Concept Planning Commission Minutes dated 2-24-97 Staff Report dated 2-19-97 Plans dated 3-11-97 CENTRON DPL CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OF CENTRON DPL FOR CENTRON DPL WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Centron DPL PUD Concept by Centron DPL and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on March 18, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Centron DPL,being in Hennepin County,Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A,is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated March 11, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated February 24, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk Exhibit A Centron DPL Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, City West Acres, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota 3 . Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 B. CENTRON DPL by Centron DPL. Request for PUD Concept Review and PUD District Review on 5 acres,Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Zoning District on 5 acres and Site Plan Review on 5 acres. Location: City West Parkway. Tom Wassmolen,representing Centron DPL, said they completed the first phase last June and the company is ready to expand. Two years ago they received approval for the second phase but some things have changed a bit. He reviewed the changes made from the original plan including additional parking and the hidden loading dock area. He noted they have more office than warehouse,more than a 50-50 split. The way the parking is laid out, it can accommodate up to 75 percent office. Clinton asked what Centron does. Wassmolen replied they refurbish computers and distribute components as well. Flemming said staff is in favor of the recommendation for approval of the project because it does meet the requirements for parking according to the 75 percent office. However, the staff report will have to be amended to show that the PUD waiver needs an office percentage increase from 50 percent to 75 percent instead of 55 percent shown on the last page under staff recommendations. Foote asked if they have granted waivers in the past from Industrial Office Zoning District to office. Flemming said the City granted waivers to MEPC and Reality Interactive. Habicht asked what the difference in parking is between new office and the industrial. Franzen said 237 spaces would be the requirement for 3/4 office and 1/4 warehouse, and it would be 160 spaces if it were 50-50. The plan is for 244 spaces. The public hearing was opened. Kardell was happy with the enclosed loading area and the parking. She supported the project. Sandstad also liked the enclosed loading area. He supported the project. Foote had no concerns and believes any time you put in an office use versus an industrial use it's a plus. He supported the project. Franzen commented the original 1981 PUD for the site was a four-story 130,000 square foot office building. Since the building is smaller, even with more office, traffic is less than the approved plan. 5 -"1 Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 Ismail liked the plan and supported the project. MOTION 1: Sandstad moved, seconded by Habicht, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Sandstad moved, seconded by Habicht, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Centron DPL for PUD Concept Review and PUD District Review on 5 acres,Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Zoning District on 5 acres and Site Plan Review on 5 acres based on plans dated February 21, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the StaffReport dated February 21, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. 6 J STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Krista R. Flemming,Planning Intern THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen,City Planner DATE: February 19, 1997 SUBJECT: Centron DPL Company,Phase II APPLICANT: Ryan Companies US,Inc. FEE OWNER: Rycent,LLC LOCATION: 6455 City West Parkway; Lot 1,Block 1 City West Acres REQUEST: 1. PUD Concept Review on 5.2 acres 2. PUD District Review on 5.2 acres 3. Zoning District Amendment on 5.2 acres 4. Site Plan Review on 5.2 acres 1 ` r J I iLi�f W. 152 IN0 St) i - y — II- .L.c;...::sNi.....i...N ig voe..!. AME}2fCAN Ft4Mii.7 •\\.... , 2 ri g •.7 1 a i , i '1:C ca mitt 40p, '••,.:)),i4-•:' 110 2/4•7; 4- /...0 0 \ ' Kr,... ..:,,, , x n; o CI ./1/ / . \ ..: \ . \ 7 , .:::::-;:•::, ,/,-;,1.;.-,=:..:3--- ..„,1---------------\....e. i ., ,...-.... . •&.e2,,,,.,.</o_k-\\ ) ) (, ,,,// I/ 1 ..:,.. ,,,, , ,,\,...,:-.,. „,-,- \) i ...... , v.,:: . ., „....c. ,:„._:„., ,w ./.,...„.. 1,::,: 1 , ..._ m . „,—,-_. .- d.,; ,.„,, g c.i 5 \441 \ ..._ i 4. :: 11111 ,:,•-•4j),...." I 1 kelk . 1 ////1 / / //c---.1-(7:. '9°41-.) c•-t... N --7 -�1 \ . r /���rlr l ,w ....„,,,-, , .....r.... : :. illr ,k, 411,/. _ . A.,, I :„.„,_ _., , \ , _ (2,-, .,. , Mho I /% /'�,. 1 ,...,.. . . Sy4Q 'ti�':: Y �/ �► 1 I \ I fE.) 1 i /if/ . . . .. . .... : . : . ./..:. .z., ... 2 L ) 1Q-ti $C t I __ii ri--•—i 274 W. 70 i► .. s _ _ t T` V 272 1j �i j_.____ .•*-. :::: ;.::: . Or .y!• em:.1 . • L_ i.:pit. FIR:,' Ait, r-,..,..:, . ..:_,.....„--.7 _ - _ •::•:.:::•: :: . .. . . : ::. •. • ,. .•.• • . .•. • . - • " " ••••• .• • ••_. •• • • • . ... • •. .•. . DATA ;3 ..... r,:t•-. ro ...•. m v; 0 h Staff Report Centron DPL Company, Phase II February 19, 1997 LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required for this project is based upon a caliper inch requirement and screening of parking and loading areas. The expansion area requires 66 caliper inches. The landscape plan provides 71.5 caliper inches. The parking is screened from City West Parkway. The expansion completes the required screening of the loading area from City West Parkway and adjacent land uses. LIGHTING Lighting will match existing 30' high downcast (shoebox) fixtures consistent with City West standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review,Zoning District Amendment in the I-2 Zoning District, Site Plan Review, based on plans dated February 19, 1997, and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated February 19, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. B. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. C. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 2. The following waivers from city code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the 1-2 Zoning district: A. Office percentage increase from 50%to 55%. 3. Staff Report Centron DPL Company,Phase II February 19, 1997 BACKGROUND This 5.2 acre site is part of a Planned Unit Development approved in 1985. In 1994,the Centron site was approved for a 60,000 sq. ft.building to be constructed in two phases,40,000 for phase one and 20,000 for phase two. Phase I was completed in 1995. Phase II could have been built without further Planning Commission and City Council review if the percentage of office use was less than 50%. The site is currently zoned I-2. SITE PLAN The site plan shows a 60,728 sq. ft.building. The existing building is 39,731 sq. ft. and the expansion is 20,977 sq. ft. Although the building is larger than the approved plan, the project meets coverage, setbacks,and parking requirements of the I-2 Park zoning district. The building use is 55% office and 45% warehouse. The I-2 zoning district allows a maximum of 50%office. The developer is requesting a planned unit development waiver. This waiver is suitable to the site since it is guided office and the existing building is built to office standards. Staff supports the office percentage waiver. GRADING The site was graded in 1994 with the construction of Phase I. Minimal grading is necessary for the building expansion. There are no significant trees that will be lost due to construction. ARCHITECTURE When Centron was approved in 1994, the City required the building to meet Office District exterior material requirements for 75%face brick and glass. The building expansion meets this requirement. UTILITIES/DRAINAGE Sewer and water service exist in City West Parkway. A NURP pond is located on the northwest portion of the site. 2 9 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. E DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger EDENVALE CROSSINGS BUSINESS CENTER Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 2.9 acres and from Rural to I-2 on 9.8 acres and PUD District Review on 12.7 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Concept Amendment on 12.7 acres. • Adoption of a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 12.7 acres into 3 lots. Background: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its February 24, 1997 meeting. The project includes a request to change the Guide Plan from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres. This request is consistent with the guide plan changes approved for the Metro Printing development(1995), Sampsons Studio building(1995), and Reality Interactive(1996). The following reasons support this request: 1. The proposal is a mixture of mostly office with some industrial, consistent with the current mix of office/warehouse uses in the PUD. 2. The proposed office building along Valley View Road provides a transition to the multi-family residential to the north. 3. All buildings will be constructed to meet office building material standards consisting of 75%face brick and glass. In addition, waivers for parking setback,and 75% office use for building C is requested through the PUD. These requests are consistent with the Edenvale Executive Center,and Reality Interactive buildings within the PUD. The waiver requests are reasonable since they provide for cross access and better circulation,more efficient use of the land, and the parking will remain completely screened from the actual highway which is over 200 feet away. The building will also be designed to office standards. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinances and Resolutions 2. Staff Report dated February 21, 1997 3. Planning Commission minutes dated February 24, 1997 4. Plans dated March 11, 1997 I EDENVALE CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan("Plan"); and, WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Edenvale Crossing Business Center by CSM Corporation for construction of one office building and two industrial buildings requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby proposes the amendment of the Plan as follows: 9.8 acres from Office to Industrial all located south and east of Anagram Drive . ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 EDENVALE CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AMENDMENT OF EDENVALE CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER FOR CSM CORPORATION WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Amendment of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Edenvale Crossing Business Center by CSM Corporation and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on March 18, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Edenvale Crossing Business Center, being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept Amendment approval as outlined in the plans dated March 11, 1997. 3. That the PUD Concept Amendment meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated February 24, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk S Edenvale Crossing Business Center Exhibit A Legal Description Preliminary Plat • Outlot C, EDENVALE 9TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, . Minnesota,except that part of said Outlot C which Ties Southerly of LINE 1,described below: LINE 1:Beginning at.the North Quarter corner.of Section 15, Township 116 North, Range 22 West thence run Southerly along the.North,and South Quarter line of stud Section 15 on an assumed azimuth,of 179 degrees 30.•Ininutes 22 seconds for 114. 15 feet; thence on an azimuth of 69 degrees 33 minutes.10 seconds, 430:21 feet thence on an azimuth of 71 degrees 55 minutes 14 seconds; 32.1.34 feet; thence on an azimuth of 24 degrees 40 minutes 37 seconds, 97.78 feet; thence on an azimuth of 334 degrees 33.minutes 46 seconds, 95.65 feet; thence on an azimuth of 45 degrees 07 minutes 37 seconds, 241.38 feet; thence on an azimuth of 52 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds, 241.87 feet;thence on an azimuth of 78 degrees 20 minutes 47 seconds, 82.67 feet; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 01 minutes 30 seconds,150-feet and there terminating. and The Northeasterly 193.00 feet of Outlot B,EDE1N'VALE 9TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,Hennepin County,Minnesota. Zoning Change from Rural to Office That part of Outlot C, EDENVALE 9TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,Minnesota, lying North of a line and'its.Westerly extension drawn from a point on the East.line of said Outlet C distant 285,81 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof to a point on the Westerly line of said Outlot C distant 205.51 feet,Southeasterly of the Northwesterly corner thereof, and said line there terminating. • Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial Zoning Change from Rural to I-2 • That part of Outlot C, EDENVALE 9TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,Minnesota,.except.that part of said•Outlot C which lies Southerly.of LINE 1 described below: • LLNE 1: Beginning at the North Quarter corner.of Section 15,Township 116 North, Range 22 West thence run Southerly along the North'and South Quarter line of said Section 15 on an assumed azimuth of 179 degrees 30 minutes 22 seconds for 114. 15 feet;thence on an azimuth of 69 degrees 33 minutes 10 secbnds. 430.21 feet; thence.on an azimuth of 71 degrees.55 minutes 14 seconds, 321.84 feet;thence on an azimuth of 24 degrees 40 minutes 37 seconds, 97.78.feet: thence on an azimuth of 334 degrees 33.minutes 46 seconds,.95.65 feet;thence on an azimuth of 45 degrees 07 minutes 37 seconds. 241.38 feet;.thence on aii azimuth of 52 degrees 49 minutes 58 seconds, 241.87 feet; thence on an azimuth of 78 degrees 20 minutes 47 seconds. 82.67 feet; thence on an azimuth of 124 degrees 01 minutes 30 seconds,150 feet and there terminating. EXCEPT that part lying North of.a.line and.its Westerly extension drawn from a point on the East line of 'said Outlot C distant 285.81 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof to a point on the Westerly line of said Outlot C distant 205.51 feet Southeasterly of the Northwesterly corner thereof, and said line there terminating. and The Northeasterly 193.00 feet of Outlot B,EDENVALE 9TH ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof.Hennepin County,Minnesota. ' EDEN P VALE CROSSINGandPla BUSINESS CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF EDENVALE CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER FOR CSM CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Edenvale Crossing Business Center for CSM Corporation dated March 11, 1997, consisting of 12.7 acres into 3 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the , amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk S STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner THROUGH: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: February 21, 1997 SUBJECT: Edenvale Crossings Business Center APPLICANT: CSM Corporation FEE OWNER: Equitable Life Assurance Society LOCATION: South and east of Equitable/Anagram Drive, south of Valley View Road REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 12.7 acres. 3. Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 12.7 acres. 4. Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 2.9 acres, and from Rural to I-2 on 9.8 acres 5. Site Plan Review on 12.7 acres. 6. Preliminary Plat of 12.7 acres into 3 lots. - Hill "1 ' 1 --&.1 c:...:.....- _ •Ss4t t..L. 1 ,o4. ,, 4#1,--";-" ,,,,.... / mirlia s___ )/ ' ' Jr 5 0 .., .717 1111 v >1eiEl TRAI ' a a. ' • m ---1..5---lc- \ \ ., IsrJ w v .• ., ,,. , • J--,_ a.•.- <4 — 4 ask . 71' lm Nprf- iu �, III i i .!...COT l c---- lira L, c‹:i. /4 <y NE / ' ....,-. ,....-\ •,. ...:•,..1._ •90 '‘-\\ \\\ -„- • •C. lit`, .:' x IYL:UR f_ a�f(� G.' DRIVE ANAGRAM ``' P'A Z A 111..."" ..>11c1/.. .0/ ..aiwgIIIIIIIII II • I ': . 1414-'1/4 Y FyT� °�wE. 414 , N. i L1in „ • .<`is ., :."-'e--'tee • \ , a = \\A\ _CI Edenvale Crossings Business Center Staff Report February 21, 1997 BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan identifies the property for Office land use. The property is currently zoned Rural. The site is part of the 100 acre Edenvale 9th Planned Unit Development, approved by the City in 1982 for office and industrial land uses. Surrounding land uses consist of Anagram Corporation,Minnesota Plastics, and Reality Interactive(not built),zoned I-2, to the west, Norwest Bank and Allstate, zoned commercial and office, respectively, to the east, with RM-6.5 across Valley View Road to the north, and highway 5 to the south. GUIDE PLAN CHANGE/PUD CONCEPT AMENDMENT The original PUD showed industrial land uses on the interior portion of the Equitable Drive/Anagram Drive loop road, with office land uses on the outer perimeter. The request is to change the Guide Plan from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres of the 12.7 acre site, and to amend the PUD to allow for development of one office building, and two industrial buildings. This request is consistent with the guide plan changes approved for the Metro Printing development(1995), Sampsons Studio building(1995), and Reality Interactive(1996). The following are reasons to consider the guide plan change: 1. The proposal is a mixture of mostly office with some industrial, consistent with the current mix of office/warehouse uses in the PUD. 2. The proposed office building along Valley View Road provides a transition to the multi- family residential to the north. 3. All buildings will be constructed to meet office building material standards consisting of 75% face brick and glass. SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT The request is to plat the property into three lots,and rezone 2.9 acres from Rural to Office, and 9.8 acres from Rural to I-2, for construction of 130,000 sq. ft. in three buildings. Lot 1,Building A This 2.9 acre site will remain guided office as a transitional use to the residential property across Valley View Road. A one-story 16,200 sq. ft.building is proposed. The Base Area Ratio, and Floor Area Ratio is 13%. City code permits up to a 30% BAR and a 50% FAR in the Office Zoning District. The building meets the 50 foot setback from Valley View Road as required by the PUD, and exceeds the 35 foot building setback required by code. Parking meets required setbacks. A total of 81 parking spaces is required by code. The plan shows 85 spaces. 2 Edenvale Crossings Business Center Staff Report February 21, 1997 Lot 2, Building B This 6.7 acre site is proposed to be zoned I-2. A one-story 83,300 sq. ft. building is proposed. The Base Area Ratio, and Floor Area Ratio is 27%. City code permits up to a 30% BAR and a 50% FAR in the I-2 Zoning District. The building meets the required setbacks for the I-2 District. This lot has two frontages with Anagram Drive and Highway 5. Parking is setback 25 feet from Anagram Drive, which meets code. Two parking setback waivers are requested through the PUD: 1. Front yard setback from Highway 5 right of way from the required 50 feet to 28 feet. 2. Side yard setback from the required 10 feet to zero feet. The waivers are reasonable since they provide for cross access and better circulation,more efficient use of the land, and the parking will remain completely screened from the actual highway which is over 200 feet away. A total of 236 parking spaces is required by code base on one-third office, manufacturing, and warehouse use. The plan shows 240 spaces. Lot 3, Building C This 3.1 acre site is proposed to be zoned I-2. A one-story 30,500 sq. ft. building is proposed. The Base Area Ratio, and Floor Area Ratio is 24%. City code permits up to a 30% BAR and a 50% FAR in the I-2 Zoning District. The building meets the setbacks for the I-2 District. The site needs the same parking setback waivers as lot 2. Mitigating reasons are the same. The lot has two frontages. Parking meets the required 25 foot setback from Anagram Drive. However, a small amount of parking is 35 feet from the Highway 5 right of way rather than the required 50 feet. A waiver from 50%to 75%office use is requested. This request is consistent with the Edenvale Executive Center, and Reality Interactive buildings within the PUD. The building will be 75 % face brick and glass. The waiver request is reasonable since the building is designed to office standards. A total of 118 parking spaces is required by code base on 75%office and 25% warehouse use. The plan shows 118 spaces. UTILITIES/DRAINAGE Sanitary sewer and water is available to all sites with connection to existing lines in Equitable/Anagram Drive. The plan provides for the required NURP pond. a 9 Edenvale Crossings Business Center Staff Report February 21, 1997 ARCHITECTURE All three buildings are single-story and will be constructed to meet the office zoning district standard with at least 75% face brick and glass. The office building is 16 feet in height. The two industrial buildings are 32 feet(building B), and 21 feet(building C). Code permits office buildings up to 30 feet high, and industrial buildings up to 40 feet high. All rooftop mechanical equipment are screened with three foot high parapet walls. Colors for the building materials shall be consistent with other buildings within the PUD. All loading doors for building's B and C should match the color of the buildings. Proposed site lighting is 25 foot pole mounted downcast fixtures. For consistency with the PUD, all pole lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height. Lighting intensity should not exceed one-half foot candle at the property line. All trash areas shall be inside the buildings. Monument signs are proposed along Anagram Drive for each building,meeting code requirements. LANDSCAPING/SCREENING The tree inventory shows 22 significant trees totaling 363 caliper inches. Eleven trees will be lost as part of the proposal totaling 215 caliper inches, or 59%. The tree loss is the result of limited development area available on lot 1 by the location of the NSP transmission lines, the required NURP pond construction, and the need to provide a level building sites. Tree replacement is 169 caliper inches. A total of 812 caliper inches of landscaping is required for this project. The plan provides 1,025 caliper inches, including the tree replacement, meeting code requirements. Code also requires screening of all parking and loading areas. Berming and plant material provide the necessary screening along Equitable/Anagram Drive. A six foot high wood screening wall with decorative rock face block columns and landscaping is proposed along the back sides of building's B and C to screen all loading areas from Highway 5 and Prairie Center Drive. Site sections show screening of the overhead doors. No signs shall be permitted on the wood screening walls. A three-tiered, 32 foot high retaining wall is proposed along the existing knoll at the southeast corner of the site. This wall is needed to maintain the knoll for screening of the Edenvale PUD from the T.H. 5/Prairie Center Drive intersection. MnDOT owns the property encompassing the knoll, and will be lowering the height of the knoll approximately 13 feet as part of constructing the new T.H. 212/Prairie Center Drive interchange in 1998. The knoll will still provide the necessary screening of the parking and majority of building B after the interchange construction. Two smaller sections of retaining wall are proposed on the back side of building C. These walls will be buffered with evergreen trees. All walls will be constructed of modular masonry material. Irrigation of the landscaping is proposed. 4 16 Edenvale Crossings Business Center Staff Report February 21, 1997 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff would recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres,Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 12.7 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 12.7 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to office on 2.9 acres and from Rural to I-2 on 9.8 acres, Site Plan Review on 12.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 12.7 acres into 3 lots,based on plans dated February 21, 1997,this report, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall revise the lighting plan to be consistent with the lighting within the overall PUD, including the use of 20 foot downcast cutoff fixtures. 2. Prior to final plat approval,the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff,utility, and erosion control plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3. Prior to grading permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Stake the grading limits with erosion control fence. B. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading. C. Submit detailed plans for the construction of the retaining walls to the Inspections Department. Said retaining walls shall be constructed with modular masonry materials. 4. Prior to building permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping improvements and mechanical equipment screening. B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for their review and approval. C. Submit exterior building material samples and colors for review, including colors for the loading doors to match the building color for maximum blending. 5. The following waivers are granted as part of the PUD: A. 75% office use within the I-2 Zoning District for building C. Code maximum is 50%. B. Front yard parking setback from Highway 5 frontage to 25 feet, and 35 feet for 5 it Edenvale Crossings Business Center li Staff Report February 21, 1997 buildings B and C, respectively, together with a zero lot line parking setback between the two lots, as shown in the plans. Code requires a 50 foot front yard setback and a 10 foot side yard setback. � tt 1� Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 D. EDENVALE CROSSING BUSINESS CENTER by CSM Corporation. Request for Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres, PUD Concept Amendment on 12.7 acres, PUD District Review on 12.7 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 2.9 acres, and from Rural to I-2 on 9.8 acres, Site Plan Review on 12.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 12.7 acres into 3 lots. Location: South and east of Anagram drive. John Dietrich, representing CSM Corporation, reviewed the development proposal including the site plan, landscaping plan and building elevations. They agree with the staff report's recommendations. He noted the buildings will be staggered because the road drops 30 feet in elevation from the high point of the driveway of building C. The building amount will remain 100 percent office. All the buildings are structured so they are in excess of the 75 percent glass and brick. Sandstad asked to see the east elevation for the building in the loading area because he was concerned about how effectively they could buffer those uses. Dietrich showed the building elevations and explained the buffering. Foote asked where the NSP transmission line was. Dietrich showed him on the map. Ismail asked what type of industrial use would be in the buildings. Dietrich replied the industrial element would be more of a warehouse type facility. It is not a manufacturing element but it would involve some use of trucks and a loading facility. Staff recommended approval according to the recommendations of the last pages of the staff report. The public hearing was opened. Ismail liked what he saw and supported the project. MOTION 1: Foote moved, seconded by Ismail,to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Foote moved, seconded by Ismail, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of CSM Corporation for Guide Plan Change from Office to Industrial on 9.8 acres, PUD Concept Amendment on 12.7 acres, PUD District Review on 12.7 acres,Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 2.9 acres,and from Rural to I-2 on 9.8 acres, Site Plan Review on 12.7 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 12.7 acres into 3 lots based on plans dated February 21, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 21, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. 8 l&' %IP "' Or, Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division op Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 March 3, 1997 Michael Franzen City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Michael Franzen: SUBJECT: Edenvale Crossing Business Center Preliminary Plat Review P97-006 North Side of Trunk Highway (TH) 5, East of Equitable Drive Eden Prairie, Hennepin County CS 2701 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Edenvale Crossing Business Center preliminary plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subd. 2, Plats. We find the plat acceptable for further development with consideration of the following comments. • The plat adequately identifies Mn/DOT right of way. However, details concerning the course, distance and bearing should be rectified. Please contact Elliott Ruhland of our Right of Way Section at 582-1279 for further clarification. In addition, the right of way on the southerly end of the site is subject to change per City approval. A large hill exists on the southerly portion of this property. We will not alter the hillside without City approval. Please contact Dave Torfin of our Surveys Section at 797-3113 with any questions. • Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way will require an approved Mn/DOT permit. The permit required depends upon the nature of the proposed work. Bill Warden of our Permits Section may be contacted at 582-1443 for further information regarding the permit process. Please contact me at 582-1654 with any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, Scott Peters Senior Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison c: Pete Tulkki, Hennepin County Surveys Section An equal opportunity employer �` EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3-18-97 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. F DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger CHIMNEY PINES Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • 1st Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 1.29 acres and Zoning District Amendment 'in the R1-9.5 sues district on 1.29 acres; • Approve a Resolution for PUD Amendment Review on 1.29 acres; • Approve a Resolution for Preliminary Plat of 1.29 acres into 8 lots. Background: At the February 24, 1997 meeting,the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project. One resident spoke regarding screening and landscaping along the east property line. The developer indicated that landscaping will be installed according to the approved plan this spring. Supporting Reports: Resolution for PUD Amendment Resolution for Preliminary Plat Planning Commission Minutes dated 12-9-96 and 2-24-97 Staff Report dated February 21, 1997 Plans dated March 11, 1997 I CHIMNEY PINES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT REVIEW OF CHIMNEY PINES FOR LAUKKA-JARVIS,INC. WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Amendment Review of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Chimney Pines PUD Amendment by Laukka-Jarvis, Inc. and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers) and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on March 18, 1997; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Chimney Pines,being in Hennepin County, Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Amendment Review approval as outlined in the plans dated March 11, 1997. 3. That the PUD Amendment Review meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated February 24, 1997. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A Chimney Pines Legal Description: Lots 14 - 19, Block 1 of the Bluff at Riverview. 3 CHIMNEY PINES CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CHIMNEY PINES FOR LAUKKA-JARVIS,INC. BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of Chimney Pines for Laukka-Jarvis,Inc. dated March 11, 1997, consisting of 1.29 acres into 8 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 18th day of March, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: John D. Frane, City Clerk y Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CHIMNEY PINES by Laukka-Jarvis, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 1.29 acres,Planned Unit Development Review on 1.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the RI-9.5 acre district on 1.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.29 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.29 acres into 8 lots. Location: Spyglass Drive, south of Riverview Road. Peter Jarvis, Laukka-Jarvis, Inc, reviewed the development proposal with the Commission. He gave background information surrounding this proposal and explained the mistake that was made. The request is to take a lot with one house and make it consistent with the overall development plan. This is a replat of the homestead which is identical of what was approved a year and a half ago. The plan is to subdivide 1.29 acres into eight lots. The existing house would be removed and replaced with three new homes. The total square footage of the three houses is less than the square footage on the existing house. The original plan was for vinyl siding but the new plan is to do stucco for the nine elevations for the three plans they have. Staff recommended approval according to the recommendations on the last page of the staff report. The public hearing was opened. Laura Blummel, 10540 West Riverview Drive,noted she lives half a block down the block from this property and was not concerned about the removal of the old home. She was happy to hear the developer admit to the mistake they made. The five foot wide setbacks amount to 10 feet between houses and this is a deviation from anything else on the site. This will look like a fence of houses. She was concerned about saving the bluffs. There was also concern about the landscaping plan because all she has seen is destruction of the trees. They put trees along the houses that back on that development along the west end of West Riverview Drive. There are a few trees that were planted there. It seems there are a lot more plantings that occurred within the development and the north side along the Riverview Road edge. She was also concerned about the Jack Pine trees that remain up on the southeast edge under the power lines. She wanted to know what the plan for those trees will be. There also needs to be a visual buffer for the neighbors to the east because they see all the construction going on. There was also concern about a traffic control at Concord heading eastbound because when you're coming down the street it's difficult to see the traffic coming towards you. The intersection needs to be equalized stop traffic at both directions otherwise there will be an accident. 2 5 Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 Franzen commented the Planning Commission asked for a traffic study. There was a recommendation for a stop sign at Concord and it is the responsibility of the City to install it. He said he would look into it tomorrow. Jarvis stated when Erickson Construction made the connection near the site, there were five trees planted on the perimeter of the chain linked fence surrounding that area. They were destroyed. He signed a change order on July 19, 1996 which covered the replacement of those five conifer trees. All five of those trees were replaced and he knows for a fact that at least one of those trees are no longer up straight. It's horizontal for whatever reason, but any trees that do not survive the warming period,horizontal or turned over, will be replaced. With respect to the east side of the project,there are a number of plantings planned for that area. They have not been planted yet because the construction has not been done yet. After curb and gutter goes in,late spring or summer,there are approximately 18 to 20 trees that will be planted on the east end to screen the residents that are further to the east. This is on the plan and bonded as part of the approved landscaping plan on file with the City. The landscaping plan reflects 989 caliber inches to be planted which is 229 inches in excess of what the ordinance requires. In addition,based on the original grading plan of 171 inches that were going to be taken out, that was reduced to 109 inches as a result of them field staking the area. Laura Blummel passed around to the Commissioners photographs depicting all the trees near where the interceptor was. Jarvis noted all the trees in the photographs will remain. None of them are required to stay because none of them meet the minimum. It's a clump of conifers. Those that were removed were removed to provide for the turn around which is totally underneath the easement. The original design was changed by the Engineering Department because they wanted a complete circle instead of a T-shape turn around. When the roadway is complete, there are an additional 18 trees to be planted around the turn around in addition to what's remaining. Foote commented it's a better looking plan with the house removed than it would be with keeping the house there. He supported the project. Ismail said it's a very nice plan and supported the project. Kardell stated the project is doing exactly what she anticipated it would do, saving the lower portion of the property and remaining undisturbed, and transferring density to the top. She supported the project. 3 (P Eden Prairie Planning Commission February 24, 1997 Habicht commented he was in favor of the amendment especially to the extent it's centrally limited to the removal of the existing house. However, it's nice to get an update on the entire project. MOTION 1: Kardell moved, seconded by Foote, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION 2: Kardell moved, seconded by Foote, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Laukka-Jarvis, Inc. for PUD Amendment Review on 1.29 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the R1-9.5 acre district on 1.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.29 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.29 acres into 8 lots based upon plans dated February 10, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated February 21, 1997, and the amendment to 75 percent. Motion carried 6-0. 4 Eden Prairie Planning Commission December 9, 1996 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CHIMNEY PINES by Laukka-Jarvis, Inc. Request for Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 1.29 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.29 acres, Zoning District Amendment in the R1-9.5 Zoning District on 1.29 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.29 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.29 acres into 8 lots. Location: Spyglass Drive, south of Riverview Road. Franzen explained the developer has withdrawn the project at this time. Additional archaeological survey is needed for two burial mounds south of the existing house. Staff recommends the Commission close the public hearing and return the development plans to the proponent without prejudice. MOTION 1: Ismail moved, seconded by Foote,to close the public hearing and return the development plans to the proponent without prejudice. Motion carried 6-0. 2 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen,City Planner DATE: February 21, 1997 SUBJECT: Chimney Pines APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Laukka Jarvis LOCATION: Spyglass Drive, south of Riverview Road REQUEST: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment Review on 1.29 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 1.29 acres. 3. Zoning District Amendment in the R1-9.5 District on 1.29 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 1.29 acres. 5. Preliminary Plat of 1.29 acres into 8 lots. 1 i'. 1 L I j i \ vusesz 4..i 6'2 i ---___1.__________ _\:.•::.: . . - - • rt. \ ,:„.•.*., . i 1 1 7/74%-te,.girk 6Th 0 . _4,4 2:fr A, ,..411P-41111P - la 1 Vir-Vii* co n 1A0 II . " v , ID .. .' •:.A.x ':::.:4 i'i 1:: _1 Ailbr,_: _ ,.. A 7-doe . sri ,..7.71 L__, igfr. wi r im pi pi = 11111011 4114111=111' "- s um= - . .. ... a -/ spi( .... .. ... . ., • ,.. - •2 *41ifiEM Dm 11 Ain, . -`-, co.Ro., i lb I 44'41 02/4 *nu i L' 1111111Pgia . .. ma Ea* ,_ - Nora 1.1 ofir c, ,.. ezza Immo am maw , 1 !i't-e '. '-'0 40 ,- : • i; -..%.• as .; via r _ awls I ..... -3 Nip Ap Rum! t .ilii,„,„ 4,,,,,, \ 111111 or--fp. 4 raviall.11 1 44:-- .f Ammo 1., e E.: \ \ '4.Iiiir ari 14 RivimuLV ii 0" will r - cr-i''' \/..... ..., ,4.1 i°1 1 ft -Ldtera .. far‘4117-•••ACIPI.liftft..-- P".6 1 '81-05 • • M 41 -t : •:.. • ':.1 t.,a:. —I . di V:CT : it. ..w.-L a ,(F .#. E-751. .4...6, 110 cm, A .. "Th It 1 - - A 5:_tv.s.r5iN,, -.so« i , -4, :.- dis ',--- R4$& * - efirr,1111Arm — - M ;,', ' ' • - / . * \N? 411144v up „. pAbi.- 4 ,..„,, Ai ipe• , , . i• . f - r l% 40oo ... I, imiL Av A‘ VI k 4‘4\441 • 1171 ,141 to. 0- 4°11°P.410;7111hNhi midi 2021, Mr/WM ,....• ....1,•+' 4P40 10.11"7, \ • 'wool) i ...,.0 AV. _ S. ''N• „,.... .004GLE IV#;% - . . vill 1114,Z14,044, 4.14e dhal .. I \ „AO.. 1.:, 0* •.e.0 1111 47 '" - ma - -: . 4. 7 Ilb --A )ft Eth --L , 1111111110 f. 14114r • --' 1 z;of- , Lift 42", -4,, ',.• vt.,)-• . . ccu, eihtil all e‘,7 .7 4 iiiimpr / /I'VE)? Li \ I I rn IMINIME if iik : * BA lill vier , 1 j111111111ft warm* : 'A WI Al IV 411pj I 1 11-•:. 4 .011/ :- a' . 11111M10/16111111110 2 - - - X I-- an MO l'-'. o - 1 M514 , ' 1 7 3 414 : __ ,,wpatr.. 1ta II ...-_.• . ..% .. alifieS.. ,.--- :....,•.-:: :-:-...:- ,;i:• ''‘ 61 - R. -_. :: . • TIE •• - - - L. . ......„, (,...,, .:.,......- ., , ......, ..::: : •:-•. ::::::.. •.:...:,:,. .. , .., .., .le ..i!.:'- ..... EsTrri3 - •:...... - -::::- ' •:--': -.. • •::::.:;i::::•::::,......—.. •.:—.::::: :;:::.... I :Ii:. . .::.•::•:: :. :::i:ii-:... ••.::•::: :•/.7.i:*•,:. •••:•:::::::.:.:: • ••••:•:•.•:::.::::.::i::::,... .•:::::::::::—. .::::: :::: ,:k::::::..-. t " ' ..;:iii:i::.••. :i.:• —::::::::: : :i:••„:--..............:.:.:.::::::::•• . :i. ••••!•!-• -:: :::::.:::::::Jeiti:i:::::- • .•-‹-::-::::•:::::::::,.,.•:•-•• •::•::: /0 .,-..•: :, . Staff Report Chimney Pines February 21, 1997 BACKGROUND This 1.29 acre site is part of the Laukka Jarvis Planned Unit Development approved in 1995. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL The plan is to subdivide 1.29 acres into eight lots. The existing house would be removed and replaced with 3 new homes. The lot lines on five existing lots to the east would be adjusted slightly. The three new homes would be constructed consistent with the architectural theme for the approved Planned Unit Development. TREES There are 220 inches of significant trees on the Laseski site. A total of 122 inches would be lost due to construction or construction practices. The developer has provided an updated tree inventory for the entire property which shows tree savings beyond the approved plan. The City Forester has reviewed this information and determined that the additional tree savings offsets the tree loss on the Laseski site. No additional tree replacement is required. BURIAL MOUNDS The 1995 archaeological survey indicated the potential for burial mounds to the south of the existing home. These are mounds five and six of burial site 21-HE-22. The attached letter from the State Archaeologist indicates that development is cleared to proceed on the Laseski site.. Any ground-disturbing activity may result in accidental recovery of human remains.Native American burials can exist here, but are not evident. If human remains are uncovered, all construction and excavation must stop. Local law enforcement and the State Archaeologist must be notified. TRAFFIC Traffic will increase by traffic by 4%. This would be 15 total trips during the day and 1.5 trips during the A.M. and P. M. peak hour. 2 II Staff Report Chimney Pines February 21, 1997 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS The following waivers from city code are required in the R1-9.5 Zoning district. These waivers are consistent with the approved Planned Unit Development and are a tradeoff for land dedicated along the bluff. A. Front yard setback to 25 feet. B. Sideyard setback to 5 feet. C. Minimum lot size to less than 9500 square feet as shown on the preliminary plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Amendment in the R1-9.5 Zoning District, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review based on plans dated February 21, 1997 and subject to the recommendations of the staff report dated February 24, 1997, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval,the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to Building Permit issuance,the proponent shall: A. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. B. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. C. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3 I2 Staff Report Chimney Pines February 21,1997 District, and 'n the proponent shall notifythe CityEngineer, Watershed s , 3. Prior to grading, p p City Forester. Construction fencing to protect existing trees must be in place and approved by the City Forester prior to grading and tree removal. 4. The following waivers from city code are granted as part of the Planned Unit Development District review in the R1-9.5 Zoning district: A. Front yard setback to 25 feet. B. Sideyard setback to 5 feet. C. Minimum lot size to less than 9500 square feet as shown on the preliminary plat. g\jan\mike\reports\thimney.pns 4 DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: V G- SECTION: Public Hearing DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Vacation 97-01 Engineering Division Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements within Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, David Olson Boulder Pointe Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action: Adopt the resolution vacating the drainage and utility easements within Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Boulder Pointe. Overview: The property owner has requested the vacation of the underlying drainage and utility easements within the referenced lots to enable the combination and replatting of the property. The applicant has purchased both lots, intends to construct a single family home and replat the two lots into one. The replat will include the dedication of replacement drainage and utility easements. Supporting Information: Vacation drawings i CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. • VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN BOULDER POINTE WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements All drainage and utility easements on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Boulder Pointe, according to the plat thereof recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 18, 1997 after due notice was given to affected property owners and published in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851; WHEREAS, is has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and have no interest in the public, therefore, should be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: 1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 18, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk 2 • . V. . . . • • ..- •- , . Sio . .,....=6--••1.7 1.0.1."2.1 .; . . il..„,. Is. ; S \ 1 !ill I' *••• A31 i 11 ... •••• — Fla 11 • .r. -- 27..6 -,, . sp - . ••• 2 ), i, ,.......4c., 1 8. ... •' :111. I § I 1 ' kt Pg'' _ _I 1„ "•.v e tee t•,• ' 'tel et . .• t ,..2! . ......---• •-I til P! re I,i, ....-3 t • ''a, --..„,"'' g Ili 1;5\'''• .._ i l' _.e• - c"--;".; 'eet.. . ,\ ...-:-......... „, 2 it . ••••''':5 I .. III il ,, .,I. •, ...?• ..01:;.;r- . N II 2!. z \ 04 II )42 a ii. % p 0 j \ :__......::::..........\ GX • " p‘ ...., on )' 11 i iiiii ;II • le- 04 -'•''.- ..... 0:6, - (........ s \ MI 111 . 4 , __-I •,,,..\ ' , d i \ .-. t \ „s \, ,,....;,.....Vot";..i-...- \' • • 1 I .- — ' - •••0••''' \ I. ..., ,• \ \...- - 4;.1,... \ ' -‘, .---4 ,, i • , co ,ki,\ . 0 I I I: . , , s •••?.....„:, -,,ej;0. 7"‘to I ' . .4 4' in , 1 z" -. Li I •!1 ' r----------- - -a.74; : 14....41..,11, -11/1, \lge$6°...'°* Z....1 L.,.........../ 1 -'.." ........ L-L.4).....li se 1 .n • --... --.•.,. i A.. 3 -..., c.,. 1 0 . ,• -— reran. .- y v • ( 4 , 1 a .. --.... ,. ....... . ,,, :::.-_-_- __:-.:.1^fi'r.'r:',7-7‘c .••••...4. '•:.‘\ ‘ --- • ,.. • . -7 • '." ..„ . „ , , / ',,* ? i \‘',‘,; .c. -,\ .., • ,, ,,, 14 .0 k v... w.. ....., UJ L,x , %. , r.:••. \ \ , zz l'i 1 i on \\ ...-4, • , i s< `....., - ‘ Al .1 0— \ . Z 1 ' • 4..,.....4... I 11 '. / / 's-S'''s 8 „ tk. ,' / , .., 0 I' , - CI. 1 ,' "." : .i.:1,... s••,.... it4.1' 1 , . /1 C° / , ilepii.... . i•41.-1 4/ i id? II 1 i .... :,.'• J.,: Q ,' Cr 1 X r- , i-ir•-::::•-t. „LA. ..‘.....-- --1 if 4 , ---'tN.4,, ,-.•. i UJ 1 •3- ! , ...-1 CI .:•, • ,I a) 71S ....*-'7../' ! ! 1... II! . I ,.. L..... ;„q. !La:. ._ ..e .1-;--1-:.--4. n I - .z r-..?;,;:::-..,,_.1 74,. ,,z1 -....4•4r,„,,,b, k jo I ../....., --::::-1' _..it ••/ch. ''1,0,,,..,-,...,„ I ' 0 I Q 3 III wa.....-.> ",/,'4 ., .....s'.1 _......it •1.. ' ',...."414;r* ..s./ I 88/ CO t :3.• I r•-• I -, ,d,.. IR:. v '1 - ...„,...,...*:,,, al, B ':.,.;... ,'.'I•: 1 f ' .---- -'.•....,.,.- 1 1 I --a 'Zie.1 . 'A 'i •o.a., L---- -'1.1 f i .., _ 7, : I III . , , -- ,_g -,.. --,-/ • 7/__ _ - _45..... - - ; : WM"eu .... 4 MVP VON. • • • 3 . ......M. T I\ \' �` \ \ \\ f \ r I . .1.V \ 1---I fr Benchmark-Hydrant I \ \\` ' ) I S89'19'24"E \\��`J / / \\ \y Dss3 5 0406 25.03 / r ^\ \ \ `, Rs140 2 / / \ / ....: \ 'rt °09 10, 46 -\\ \\ - / ,+cIi 8 4 fi L\ j\ " \ V, en \ o / c. ac o ? A \ 0 LOT 1 it." I 4. u A\ ' r \ e & 1 ' 3 7 � O to o n ��� I . + 1 N 1- .C.. 1 dIBLOCK1 Y Nls-i \ 1 W \ 1 .....ii ( I N a1 � - \ \ . a � � Tu CA 0 „) \ . ' Nu CI Boo R) IHt o \ � i- , 4 Z cRepiciA cc 401-5 I. t 4\ i \ \ e c I E 2 )o(. l ,. -+ o —2 J ) \ i c ' N V 3001c.)e�- ©1� {-e —_, \\ _\ IJ � U 110.89 � j Y Is h t 140.00 r �J N89°19'24 W I / il ji I)(/4ry EnecJen CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: prairie SECTION: Payment of Claims 3-18-97 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Payment of Claims VI Checks No. 50523 thru 50705 Wire Transfers WT000006 thru WT000021 Action/Direction: Approve payment of claims. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12-MAR-1997 (17:58) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 50523 $642.35 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER EQUIPMENT RENTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 50524 $42.00 AAHPERD OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50525 $1,445.46 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EPCC MAINTENANCE 50526 $5,848.25 AEC ENGINEERING DESIGN & CONST HIDDEN PONDS TOWER 50527 $165.00 AMERICAN MGMT ASSOC 'DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 50528 $17,833.43 AMERIDATA INC COMPUTERS ENGINEERING DEPT 50529 $43.96 AMY LECLAIRE CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 50530 $511.20 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY PRINTING ARTS 50531 $49.00 ANDERSON LAKES ANIMAL HOSPITAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 50532 $81.42 B DALTON BOOKSTORE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 50533 $27.21 B&S INDUSTRIES INC POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE 50534 $300.00 BARBARA GUSE, P.T. SCHOOLS SAFETY 50535 $173.65 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50536 $50.00 BETH AND MORLEY BURNETT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 50537 $435.79 BILL'S GUN SHOP OTHER EQUIPMENT POLICE 50538 $1,343.35 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE BUILDING EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 50539 $116.32 BODY DRENCH SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 50540 $198.00 BRENDA JERDE OFFICIATING VOLLEYBALL 50541 $80.00 BRIAN BAKER GYM SUPERVISOR ADULT OPEN GYM 50542 $236.76 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 50543 $127.49 BURNSVILLE SANITARY CO WASTE DISPOSAL STREET MAINTENANCE 50544 $475.00 CADCAM ENGINEERING SYSTEMS COMPUTERS ENGINEERING DEPT 50545 $3,662.55 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 50546 $715.00 CARLSON COUNSELING AND CONSULT EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE BENEFITS 50547 $46.34 CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50548 $48.00 CENTER FOR WATERSHED PROTECTIO SUBSCRIPTION-LESLIE STOVRING IN SERVICE TRAINING 50549 $3,998.33 CENTRAIRE INC CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS FIRE STATION #5 50550 $1,009.41 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50551 $54.58 CHANHASSEN LAWN AND SPORTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 50552 $612.00 CHRISTOPHER SODERSTROM OFFICIATING BASKETBALL 50553 $60.00 CIGAR INSIDER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 50554 $15.00 COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 50555 $64.21 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS TRAINING SUPPLIES SAFETY 50556 $145.26 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 50557 $29.00 CORPORATE REPORT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 50558 $46.09 CREATIVE CRAFTS INTERNATIONAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 50559 $237.84 CSM CORPORATION DEPOSITS ESCROW 50560 $37.50 CULLIGAN WATER WATER SOFTNER OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 50561 $76.25 CYCLES SOFTWARE BUILDING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 50562 $98.61 D C HEY COMPANY CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 50563 $162.00 DANIEL KAPKE OFFICIATING BASKETBALL 50564 $139.30 DANKA OFFICE IMAGING CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 50565 $150.00 DATACARD CORPORATION CITY BUILDING RENTAL CITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS 50566 $10,200.00 DKH EXCAVATING INC BUILDING EDENBROOK PK K09 50567 $30.00 DON ATKINS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 50568 $460.00 DOOR POWER INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1993 REHAB 54044 50569 $409.28 E F JOHNSON CO COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 50570 $966.77 EARL F ANDERSON SIGNS TRAFFIC SIGNALING 50571 $503.10 EDEN PRAIRIE CHAMBER OF COMMER REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES SOFTBALL 50572 $44.35 EDEN PRAIRIE FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50573 $115.00 EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N BLDG RENTAL ART & MUSIC 50574 $43.20 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE GENERAL 50575 $799.90 FERRELLGAS MOTOR FUELS ICE ARENA 50576 $3,047.50 FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSN PAYING AGENT HRA 2ND SHEET ICE 50577 $151.00 FIRSTAR TRUST COMPANY PAYING AGENT B & PAYMENTS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12-MAR-1997 (17:58) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 50578 $312.10 FISCHER AGGREGATES INC SAND SNOW & ICE CONTROL 50579 $1,264.40 G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 50580 $85.46 GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS LICENSES & TAXES HUMAN RESOURCES 50581 $61.34 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES FITNESS CENTER 50582 $496.92 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER 'CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50583 $166.38 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES HOMEWARD HILLS PARK 50584 $14,675.77 HARDRIVES INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS PRESERVE BLVD/ANDERSON LKS 50585 $936.25 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 50586 $470.00 HONEYWELL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 50587 $2,111.39 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50588 $718.08 J&R RADIATOR CORP REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50589 $4.00 JANECKY PLUMBING PLUMBING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 50590 $2,146.68 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE STATION #2 50591 $567.00 JEFFREY MONAHAN OFFICIATING BASKETBALL 50592 $187.00 JENNIFER BROWN GAME OFFICIAL BASKETBALL 50593 $22.07 JERRY PRODOEHL MSSA MEETING IN SERVICE TRAINING 50594 $270.00 JOAN STRASBURG OFFICIATING BASKETBALL 50595 $184.50 JOE APT INSTRUCTION FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 50596 $234.00 JOHN LYNCH OFFICIATING BASKETBALL 50597 $168.00 JOSH HENDERSON OFFICIATING ADULT OPEN GYM 50598 $75.00 KATHLEEN WARREN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 50599 $51.63 KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL WARDEN PROJECT 50600 $22.28 KNOX BUILDING MATERIALS BUILDING MATERIALS STREET MAINTENANCE 50601 $144.59 L-Z TRUCK EQUIPMENT CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50602 $1,843.33 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS PRESERVE LIQUOR #2 50603 $614.72 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50604 $1,101.60 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE TEMAN PROPERTY 50605 $75.00 LEAANN'S SEWING PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE 50606 $45,672.50 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS WORKERS COMP QTRLY INSTALLMENT BENEFITS 50607 $222.82 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGH 1997 DUES IN SERVICE TRAINING 50608 $424.21 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50609 $60.00 LOES OIL COMPANY WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50610 $67.50 LOIS N WILDER INSTRUCTOR FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 50611 $359.14 LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY BUILDING MATERIALS STREET MAINTENANCE 50612 $824.31 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50613 $432.00 MARY FREY GAME OFFICIAL VOLLEYBALL 50614 $1,429.70 MASYS CORPORATION CONTRACTED COMM MAINT POLICE 50615 $1,159.53 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 50616 $595.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 50617 $1,224.08 MENARDS BUILDING MATERIALS STREET MAINTENANCE 50620 $7,793.76 METRO SYSTEMS OFFICE EQUIPMENT GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 50621 $16.39 MIDLAND EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50622 $282.90 MIDWEST COCA COLA BTLG CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 50623 $41.00 MIDWEST TELETRON INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 50624 $15.00 MIKE POWERS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 50625 $481.50 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT PATCHING ASPHALT STREET MAINTENANCE 50626 $34,386.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH MISCELLANEOUS WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE 50627 $3,500.00 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND INC PARK EQUIPMENT PHEASANT WOODS K05 50628 $211.09 MINUTEMAN PRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES INSPECTION-ADMIN 50629 $28.63 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOC OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 50630 $150.00 MPELRA - R CHMIELEWSKI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 50631 $1,385.50 MR ROOTER PLUMBING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1993 REHAB 54044 50632 $42.50 NATE LINDHOLM OFFICIATING BASKETBALL 50633 $1,150.00 NATHAN D BUCK OFFICIATING VOLLEYBALL 50634 $259.95 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12-MAR-1997 (17:58) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 50635 $171.09 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 50636 $400.00 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. PAYING AGENT B & I PAYMENTS 50637 $3,957.25 ORRIN THOMPSON BUILDING PERMIT FD 10 ORG 50638 $270.00 PARK AUTO UPHOLSTERY CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50639 $39.00 PAULETTE MARINI INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 50640 $36.93 PENNWELL PUBLISHING CO TRAINING SUPPLIES FIRE 50641 $226.85 PHOTOS INC PHOTO SUPPLIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 50642 $188.51 PITNEY BOWES INC RENTALS GENERAL 50643 $1,025.00 PLYMOUTH PLUMBING UTILITY HAND BILLS FD 10 ORG 50644 $27.30 POOL CONSTRUCTION INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES POOL MAINTENANCE 50645 $81.72 POWER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50646 $2,395.74 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS FIRE STATION #3 50647 $155.00' PRINTERS SERVICE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 50648 $517.31 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL FIRE STATION #1 50649 $194.39 RAINBOW FOODS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 50650 $16.00 RAY N WELTER CASH OVER/SHORT FD 10 ORG 50651 $270.70 REBS MARKETING POSTAGE WATER ACCOUNTING 50652 $167.15 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 50653 $626.86 RICOH CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 50654 $370.75 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50655 $10.00 RMAA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 50656 $31.36 ROBERT OLSON INVESTIGATION TRAVEL POLICE 50657 $75.00 ROBERT REYNOLDS SCHOOLS POLICE 50658 $174.00 ROGERS SERVICE CO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50659 $1,356.91 ROLLINS OIL CO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50660 $144.00 RON SCHWARTZ OFFICIATING VOLLEYBALL 50661 $21,265.00 RUSHING COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTIO BUILDING EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 50662 $234.03 SAFETY-KLEEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL PARK MAINTENANCE 50663 $86.90 SALLY DISTRIBUTORS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SOCIAL 50664 $216.00 SAM MOSMAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SKATING RINKS 50665 $79.87 SBSI INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 50666 $3,765.45 SERCO LABORATIES OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 50667 $31.92 SHERRY BUTCHER-YOUNGHANS MILEAGE AND PARKING CITY MANAGER 50668 $1,780.35 SIGNSOURCE FURNITURE & FIXTURES SR CTR OPERATIONS 50669 $369.70 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50670 $2,169.85 SNELL MECHANICAL INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 50671 $18.11 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 50672 $75.00 SOUTHWEST FIRE LEAGUE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE 50673 $6.00 SPORTS WORLD USA INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50674 $1,625.95 ST PAUL BOOK & STATIONERY OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 50675 $2,938.79 STANDARD REGISTER OFFICE EQUIPMENT FINANCE DEPT 50676 $1.46 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 50677 $10.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSES & TAXES FIRE STATION #3 50678 $25.56 STEVE HANLON OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 50679 $648.03 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50680 $675.87 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50681 $1,767.57 SUPERIOR FORD CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50682 $125.00 SWEDLUNDS WASTE DISPOSAL OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 50683 $25.38 TARPS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 50684 $867.00 THE BREHM GROUP INC LMCACCIDENT COVERAGE-COUNCIL BENEFITS 50685 $310.01 THE WATSON CO INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 50686 $940.20 TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 50687 $306.00 TOM HOLMES OFFICIATING FEES VOLLEYBALL 50688 $3.95 TRANS UNION CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 50689 $200.00 TWIN CITY AREA LABOR MGMT COUN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 4 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12-MAR-1997 (17:58) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 50690 $34.95 TWIN CITY TIRE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50691 $210.34 TWIN CITY VACUUM CLEANING SUPPLIES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 50692 $315.24 UNIFORMS UNILIMITED CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 50693 $715.00 UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE BENEFITS 50694 $113.73 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50695 $2,677.12 US FILTER/WATERPRO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 50696 $42.49 VICKI PELLAR PRICE PHOTO SUPPLIES REC SUPERVISOR 50697 $42.73 VOSS LIGHTING OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE 50698 $519.43 W E NEAL SLATE CO ORDER#1841 SR CTR OPERATIONS 50699 $69.15 W W GRAINGER INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES VAR PARK SHELTERS 50700 $78.00 WALMART STORES INC CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 50701 $113.61 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 50702 $911.46 WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC CHEMICALS POOL MAINTENANCE 50703 $799.00 WELCH VILLAGE 5TH/6TH GRADE PROGRAMS SKI TRIPS/WINTER CAMP 50704 $39.28 WESTWELD ORDER #82347 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50705 $119.60 WEYERHAEUSER WASTE DISPOSAL EPCC MAINTENANCE $249,926.43* 000006 1097 .00 MN Dept of Rev Equip Maint Motor Fuels 000007 64988 .00 MN Dept of Rev Sales Tax 000008 1227777 . 75 Knutson Const Water Plant Exp Improvement Contracts 000009 702375 .00 Norwest Bank Principal/Int Bond Payments 000010 544370 .00 Firstar Principal/Int Bond Payments 000011 952636 .25 First Trust Principal/Int Bond Payments 000012 31272 .66 Nat ' l City Bank Principal/Int Bond Payments SubTotal 3524516 .66 000013 89033 .01 Norwest Banks Fed WH Withholding 000014 48868 . 18 Norwest Banks FICA-Employee Withholding 000015 48868 . 18 Norwest Banks FICA-Employer Withholding 000016 37615 .01 MN Dept of Rev State WH Withholding 000017 846 .20 MN Dept of Rev Equip Maint Motor Fuels 000018 36811 .00 MN Dept of Rev Sales Tax 000019 1142799 . 96 Knutson Const Water Plant Exp Improvement Contracts 000020 3494791 . 30 Norwest Bank Principal/Int Bond Payments 000021 68096 .84 First Trust Principal/Int Bond Payments Subtotal 4967729 .68 Total $ 8742172 .77 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Reports of Advisory Boards and Commissions March 18, 1997 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.: Community Information & Services - T. Kucera Report from Police - G. Therkelsen Telecommunications Task Force Requested Action: Request the City Council to refer draft Ordinance to the Planning Commission for review at its March 24 meeting. Background: As requested by the City Council at its August 6, 1996 meeting, staff has drafted a Zoning Ordinance for construction of wireless telecommunications. After meeting with industry representatives and researching other cities ordinances, the Telecommunications Task Force has finalized draft amendments to the City Code relating to Telecommunications Towers and Antennae. The Task Force is prepared to have the amendments reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council pending any revisions or suggestions. The Council public hearing is scheduled for April 1, 1997. Attachments March 10, 1997 draft Ordinance Council info\agenda a-397nQ.wpd\bmm DRAFT 3-10-97 Following are proposed amendments to Eden Prairie City Code relating to telecommunication towers and antennae: Section 1. City Code Section 11 . 03 , Subd. 6 . B. is amended as follows: B. Exceptions . The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to the issuance of a building permit for (a) a building or structure to be built or constructed on land in conformity with a Site Plan approved prior to February 21, 1989 , but not more than two years prior to issuance of the building permit by the City Council in connection with the rezoning or platting of the land, or (b) the building or alteration of an antennae or tower. The Director of Planning may determine that an alteration or enlargement of a building or structure is minor and does not require conformance with an approved Site Plan and Architectural Design or an amendment thereof, provided however, if the Director shall not make such a determination an owner of the land on which the building or structure intended to be altered or enlarged is situated may request the Council to make such determination. Section 2 . City Code Section 11 . 02 is amended by renumbering paragraphs 4 through 9 inclusive, as 5 through 10 inclusive; 10 through 41 inclusive, as 12 through 43 inclusive; 42 through 54 inclusive, as 45 through 57 inclusive; and, 55 through 63 inclusive, as 59 through 67 inclusive, and by adding new paragraphs 4, 11, 44 and 58 as follows : 4 . "Antenna" - Any structure or device used for the purpose of collecting or transmitting electromagnetic waves, including but not limited to directional antennas, such as panels, microwave dishes, and satellite dishes, and omni-directional antennae, such as whip antennae. 11 . "Commercial Wireless Telecommunication Services" - Licensed commercial wireless telecommunication services including cellular, personal communication services (PCS) , specialized mobilized radio (SMR) , enhanced specialized mobilized radio (ESMR) , paging, and similar services that are marketed to the general public. -1- 2- 44 . "Public Utility Structure" - A structure or pole supporting wires for communication or transmission of data or electricity. 58 . "Tower" - Any (a) ground or roof mounted pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof, taller than 15 feet, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, and masts, on which is mounted an antenna, meteorological device, or similar apparatus above grade, or (b) ground or roof mounted antennae taller than fifteen feet (15' ) . Section 3 . City Code Section 11 . 10, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph G. as follows : G. Antennae and Towers, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . Section 4. City Code Section 11 . 11, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph F. as follows : F. Antennae and Towers , in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . Section 5 . City Code Section 11 . 15, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph D. as follows : D. Antennae and Towers, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . Section 6. City Code Section 11 .20, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph D. as follows : D. Antennae and Towers , in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11. 06 . Section 7. City Code Section 11 .25, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph E. as follows : E. Antennae and Towers, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . Section 8. City Code Section 11 . 30, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph G. as follows : G. Antennae and Towers, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . Section 9 . City Code Section 11 . 35, Subd. 2 is amended by adding paragraph F. as follows : F. Antennae and Towers, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . -2- 3 Section 10. City Code Chapter 11 is amended by adding Section 11 . 06 as follows : "Section 11 . 06 . Towers and Antennae, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section 11 . 06 . Subd. 1. Purpose. In order to accommodate the communication needs of residents and business while protecting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community, the Council finds that these regulations are necessary in order to: A. facilitate the provision of commercial wireless telecommunications services to the residents and businesses of the City; B. minimize adverse visual effects of towers through careful design and siting standards; C. avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from tower failure through structural standards and setback requirements; and, D. maximize the use of existing and approved towers and buildings to accommodate new commercial wireless telecommunication antennae in order to •reduce the number of towers needed to serve the community. Subd. 2 . Prohibition. No tower or antenna shall be erected, constructed, maintained. altered or used unless in compliance with this section. Subd. 3 . Towers in Rural and Residential Zoning Districts . Towers shall be allowed in the Rural and Residential Zoning Districts only as follows : A. Towers for amateur radio communication and conforming to all applicable provisions of this Code shall be allowed only in the rear and side yards of rural and residential zoned lots . B. Towers for Commercial Wireless Telecommunications Services and conforming to all applicable provisions of this Code shall be allowed only in the following residentially-zoned locations : 1 . parks, when compatible with the nature of the park; 2 . schools; and -3 - 3 . public streets and rights-of-way when attached to, or part of a public utility structure. Subd. 4 . Height. A. The height of a tower shall be determined by measuring the vertical distance from the point of contact with the ground of the tower or the structure to which it is attached (if attached) to the highest point of the tower, including all antennae and other attachments . B. In all zoning districts the maximum height of a tower, except those which are public utility structures located within a Public Street or right-of-way, shall not exceed one foot for each four feet the tower is set back from a Rural or Residential Zoning District up to a maximum height of 150 feet . C. In all zoning districts, the maximum height of a tower, except those which are public utility structures located within a Public Street or right-of-way, shall not exceed one foot for each two feet the tower is set back from the nearest lot line up to a maximum height of 150 feet. D. No tower, except those which are public utility structures, located within a Public Street or right-of- way, shall be in excess of a height equal to the distance from the base of the tower to the nearest overhead electrical power line which serves more than one dwelling or place of business . E. No antennae shall extend more than 20 feet above the highest point of a public utility structure. Subd. 5 . Setbacks and Location. Towers shall conform with each of the following minimum requirements : A. Towers, except those which are public utility structures, located within a Public Street or right-of-way, shall meet the setbacks of the underlying zoning district, except industrial zoning districts where towers may encroach into the rear setback area, provided that the rear property line abuts another industrially zoned property and the tower does not encroach upon any easements . B . Towers, except those which are public utility structures, located within a Public Street or right-of-way, shall not be located between a principal structure and a public street, with the following exceptions : -4- 1 . In industrial zoning districts, towers may be placed within a side yard abutting an internal street. 2 . On sites adjacent to public streets on all sides, towers may be placed within a side yard abutting a street. C. Towers which are public utility structures located in a Public Street or right-of-way need not be set back from a street or right-of-way line. D. A tower' s setback may be reduced or its location in relation to a public street varied, at the sole discretion of the City Council, to allow the integration of a tower into an existing or proposed structure such as a church steeple, light standard, power line support device or similar structure. Integration may include replication of the existing or proposed structure by a new structure provided the new structure is substantially similar in design and color to the exiting or proposed structure and extends no more than 20 feet above the highest point of the existing or proposed structure. Subd. 6. Exceptions . The provisions of Subds . 4 and 5 shall not apply to the following: 1 . Water towers and poles supporting emergency warning devices to which are attached antennae. 2 . Church sanctuaries, steeples and bell towers to which are attached antennae. 3 . In accordance with the preemption ruling PRB1 of the Federal Communications Commission, towers for amateur radio communication that comply with other provisions of City Code Chapter 11 relating to towers . Subd. 7 . Co-Location Requirements . All commercial wireless telecommunication towers erected, constructed, or located within the City shall comply with the following requirements : A. A proposal for a new commercial wireless telecommunication services tower shall not be approved unless the City Manager or his designee finds that the telecommunications equipment intended to be attached to the proposed tower cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower, public utility structure, or building within one mile (one-half mile for towers under 120 feet in height, one quarter mile for towers under 80 feet in height) of the proposed tower due to one or more of the -5- following reasons : 1 . The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved tower, public utility structure or building, as documented at applicant' s expense by a qualified and licensed professional engineer, and if owned by applicant the existing or approved tower, public utility structure or building, cannot be reinforced, modified, or replaced to accommodate planned or equivalent equipment at a reasonable cost. 2 . The planned equipment would cause interference materially impacting the usability of the existing or planned equipment at the tower, public utility structure or building as documented at applicant' s expense by a qualified and licensed professional engineer and the interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost. 3 . Existing or approved towers, public utility structures and buildings within the search radius cannot accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary to function reasonably as documented at applicant' s expense by a qualified and licensed professional engineer. 4 . Other unforeseen reasons that make it infeasible to locate the planned telecommunications equipment upon an existing or approved tower, public utility structure or building. B. Any proposed commercial wireless telecommunication services tower, except public utility structures, shall be designed, structurally, electrically, and in all respects, to accommodate both the applicant' s antennae and comparable antennae for at least two additional users if the tower is over 100 feet in height or for at least one additional user if the tower is over 60 feet in height. Towers must be designed to allow for future rearrangement of antennae upon the tower and to accept antennae mounted at varying heights . Subd. 8 . Tower and Antenna Design Requirements . Proposed or modified towers and antennae shall meet the following design requirements : A. Towers and antennae shall be designed to blend into the surrounding environment to the maximum extent possible through the use of color and camouflaging architectural treatment, except in instances where the color is dictated by federal or state authorities such as the -6- Federal Aviation Administration. B. Commercial wireless telecommunication service towers, except those which are public utility structures, shall be of a monopole design unless the City Manager or his designee determines that an alternative design would better blend in to the surrounding environment. C. Towers shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower and then only at such time or times required. When incorporated into the approved design of the tower, light fixtures used to illuminate ball fields, parking lots, or similar areas may be attached to the tower. D. Metal towers shall be constructed of, or treated with, corrosive resistant material . Wood poles shall be impregnated with rot resistant substances . E. No antenna or tower shall have affixed or attached to it in any way, except during time of repair or installation, any lights, reflectors, flashers, or other illuminating device, except as required by the Federal Aviation Agency or the Federal Communications Commission, nor shall any tower have constructed thereon, or attached thereto, in any way, any platform, catwalk, crow' s next, or like structure, except during periods of construction or repair. F. The face of an antennae having one face shall not exceed 30 square feet. No face of an antennae having more than one face shall exceed 24 square feet per face. Subd. 9 . Interference with Public Safety Telecommunications . No new or existing Commercial Wireless Telecommunications Services shall interfere with public safety telecommunications . Before the introduction of new service or changes in existing service, Commercial Wireless Telecommunications Services providers shall notify the City at least ten (10) calendar days in advance of such changes and allow the City to monitor interference levels during the testing process . All applicants for new Commercial Wireless Telecommunications Services shall submit with the application evidence of compliance with all rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission with respect the to new Commercial Wireless Telecommunications Services . Subd. 10 . Required Approval . A tower may not be constructed or increased in size or capacity without the approval of the City Manager or his designee. In the event an application for a tower -7- is disapproved by the City Manager or his designee, the City Manager or his designee shall state the decision, together with the reasons therefor in writing. A notice of, and the written decision shall be given to the applicant by mail at the address stated in the application or such other address as applicant directs by written request to City prior to the giving of such notice. Within thirty (30) days applicant may appeal the decision of the City Manager or his designee to the City' s Board of Adjustments and Appeals in accordance with City Code Section 2 . 11 . Subd. 11. Application. An applicant for a permit for the construction of a tower shall make a written application to the City. The application shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1 . Name, address, telephone and fax numbers of applicant. 2 . Location of proposed tower, including the legal description. 3 . The locations of all existing towers within one mile of the location of the proposed tower, together with the distances between the existing towers and the proposed tower. 4 . Description of the tower, including its height, size of base, configuration, design, number of antennae to be attached to the tower, potential for additional antennae, color and camouflage treatment and lighting, if any, and materials out of which the tower will be constructed. 5 . A certificate in such form as approved by the City Manager or his designee that (a) the applicant' s commercial wireless telecommunications services equipment cannot be accommodated on an existing tower in accordance with Subd. 7 .A. hereof, (b) the applicant' s proposed commercial wireless telecommunications services tower meets the requirements of Subd. 7 .B. hereof, and (c) the commercial wireless telecommunication services to be accommodated on the proposed tower will not interfere with public safety telecommunications, and which includes a technical evaluation of existing and proposed transmissions indicating all potential interference problems . The certificate shall be by a duly licensed engineer, registered in Minnesota. 6 . The application shall be accompanied by payment of such fees as provided by City Council resolution. Fees shall include reimbursement to City of its costs, including those incurred for consulting and technical advice relating to the proposed tower. rfr\ep\telecomm\antenn2.tow _8- q EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3/18/97 ta SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources ITEM NO. AC DEPARTMENT: PRNR ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposed Improvements to the Eden Prairie Bob Lambert, Director Av Community Center Pool-HVAC and Pool Disinfectant Systems RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommend the City Council authorize preparation of plans and specifications to correct the deficiencies in the existing heating and ventilation system and the pool mechanical systems. The plans and specifications should be drafted to include the replacement of the heating and ventilation system in the swimming pool, as per the recommendations of Erickson, Ellison and Associates as described on page two of their March 7 report, and improvements to the swimming pool mechanical systems as per option two of the Water Technology, Inc. Report with an add alternate as described in option three of the Water Technology report. The estimated cost for the basic improvements recommended by staff is approximately $65,000 for the pool mechanical system improvements and an additional $300,000 for the heating and ventilation system replacement. PROPOSED FUNDING OF IMPROVEMENTS: City staff recommend the use of cash park fees for funding this improvement and for the City to reimburse the cash park fee budget through the general fund as soon as possible. Staff further recommends increasing the pool rental fees to the School District and to the swim clubs to assist the City in paying for this improvement. City staff recommend discussing the issue of sharing the cost for this improvement with the School District at the Joint Facility Use Advisory Committee. Perhaps that committee can recommend a fair way to share the costs for this project. The rationale for increasing the rental fees is supported by the following facts: 1. The total estimated cost for improving the air and water quality in the swimming pool could exceed$400,000. 2. The only users who require this improved air quality for use of the pool are the competitive swimmers. 3. The competitive swimmers account for over 90% of the pool rental revenue. The remaining rental income comes from the School District for physical education classes. 1 4. The estimated operating costf for the Community Center pool is approximately $165,000/year. If prime time use is considered from 2:30 p.m. until 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. on Saturday and from 1:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. on Sunday,there are 53 Y2 hours of prime time per week for pool rental during the school year. If prime use is from 8:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and 1:00 until 9:00 on Sunday during the summer months,there is approximately 1,000 hours of prime time available during the summer months, and approximately 1,930 hours available during the school year. During the school year, the City uses the hours from 8:30 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. on Saturdays, and from 1:00 until 5:00 p.m. on Sundays for swim lessons and open swim. It uses the hours from 8:00 a.m.until 5:00, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.until 3:00 on Saturdays, and 1:00 until 5:00 p.m. on Sundays for a combination of open swim and lesson programs during the summer months. This amounts to a total of approximately 324 hours during the school year and 780 during the summer months, for a total of approximately 1,100 hours out of the 2,930 hours of prime time use. If the operating cost$ for the pool is approximately $165,000, the actual cost to meet operating expenses is approximately $56.30/hour. Anything less than that amount is a subsidized rental for use of the pool. Any fee above that could be used for helping pay off the $400,000 borrowed from the park fund for this project. IMPACT ON THE CASH PARK FEES FUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the revised Capital Improvement Program that indicates spending approximately $375,000 in the Community Center in 1997 and possibly an additional $100,000 in 1998. The CIP anticipates the City funding the replacement of the heating and ventilation system and option two in the mechanical system in 1997, and adding the ozone system in 1998. (The Council may decide to go with the ozone system in 1997, if favorable bids are received.) In order to accommodate these expenditures, staff recommend delay of replacement of the Preserve Park shelter from 1997 until 1999 and delay of the construction of the park shelters in Miller Park. The revised CIP also anticipates the transfer from the general fund to the cash park fee fund of approximately $100,000/year over the next five years beginning 1998 in order to accommodate date anticipated expenditures and development of the park system. REASONS TO CONSIDER ADDING OZONE: Since the Community Center staff lowered the water temperature from 83 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit,there have been a significant number of older people who have dropped their membership or have quit using the facility. There has also been a drop in the number of people signing up for swim lessons because of the colder water. If the ozone treatment were added the amount of chlorine used could be reduced significantly, and staff would feel confident in being able to maintain safe combined chlorine readings at the 83 degree Fahrenheit water temperature. BL:mdd HAVC.memo/Bob97 2 I I I I EDEN PRAIRIE 1 1 COMMUNITY I „. _ . , . I . r ... _,_ . ,,.. irt_ . I 16700 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 I I POOL & HVAC SYSTEM EVALUATION I ' : T WTI PROJECT # 97001 .0 y.� c�� March 1031997 „a"� ,+nwa,v mn I z n aa— Water Technology, Inc. P.O. Box 614 W9684 Beaver-land Pkwy I Beaver Dam, WI 53916 (414) 887-7375 I (414) 887-7999 FAX S COMWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. Aquatic Designers And Engineers March 10,1997 Mr. Robert Lambert Director Parks and Recreation City of Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota • Dear Mr. Lambert, Please accept this report outlining some of the deficiencies in the existing heating and ventilating system within the Community Center Natatorium and the pool mechanical systems. The purpose of this report was to : • Identify deficiencies in the existing systems. • Make recommendations to improve the air quality within pool area. • Provide solutions that may improve the pool water quality, including ozone treatment. • Provide estimates of probable construction cost for the proposed solutions. • Water Technology, Inc. and Ericksen Ellison and Associates, Inc. have provided this information for both the HVAC system and the pool treatment systems. If there are any questions or comments both firms are at your service, Chuck Neuman with (WTI) and Bruce Johnson with (EEA). II 1, 111 Sincerely, WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. 6Z,Lez,o 91,/,,A)..eearws-%-• Charles M. Neuman President U BEAVER DAM, WI .• CEDAR RAPIDS,.IA • ATLANTA,GA LONG BEACH,,CA P.O.Box 614 • W9684 Beaverland Parkway • Beaver Dam,Wisconsin 53916 Phone 414-887-7375 • fax 414-887-7999 4 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER POOL TREATMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION MARCH 10, 1997 $ On February 20,1997 Chuck Neuman and Tom Pomerville of Water Technology, Inc. performed a survey of the existing swimming pool treatment system. At that time, we observed the pool mechanical systems in operation and reviewed the original construction documents along with selected shop drawings. After that site visit and thorough interviews with maintenance personnel, users and operating staff, we arrived at a determination of condition and proposed solutions. Additionally at that meeting a discussion was held with staff, Ericksen Ellison and Associates, Inc. and Water Technology, Inc. regarding the existing HVAC system, and some of the proposed solutions. EXISTING CONDITIONS There are five basic components that allow pool water to be treated efficiently to make it safe and pleasing for swimmers and to comply with local and state health codes. FILTRATION The filtration system removes particulate matter from the water. The existing system is high rate sand. The system is an original steel vessel that is showing signs of deterioration due to rust from the outside. The system appears to be operating; however, valves and face piping leading to the filter may need some replacement maintenance in the foreseeable future. Valves of this type should be replaced rather than repaired. The sand is probably due for replacement also. CIRCULATION PUMP The main circulation pump supplies water taken from the bottom and top of the pool and runs it through the filter for removal of matter. It is important that this piece of equipment is operating properly to provide adequate flow rates and to insure circulation throughout the pool and provide the proper turnover per state code. If there is improper flow the result is poor water quality sooner or later. If the bather load is heavy, it will be sooner. EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER POOL TREATMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION WTI PROJECT#97001.0 1 onto TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5 I CHEMICAL DISINFECTING The current system is a liquid sodium hypochlorite. It is delivered to the pool system via a positive displacement pump through plastic lines originating in the chlorine room. The location of your chlorine tanks is the furthest we have seen, and from past experience, will eventually cause problems either by clogging or leaking. In general, these systems are quite common; however, may not be the best for all applications due to the problems of difficult pH control and the introduction of solids into the pool water. The greater the need for chlorine the more solids that are deposited into the pool water. Many of these systems are being replaced with solid chlorine systems which require less storage space, introduce less solids into the pool, and have a more stable pH requiring less adjustment and less cost. IpH CONTROL Currently pH control is accomplished by use of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This is an excellent method; however, it should be matched with the correct and complimentary chlorine system that is also suited to your city water supply. CONTROLS AND MONITOR SYSTEMS The system in place at this facility is rather basic and the original equipment. a The chlorine and pH adjustment are controlled by an old model Chemtrol unit. It senses the chlorine level in the water and signals the chlorine pump on and off. The same situation occurs with the pH control. There are much more accurate systems available today that also have remote reporting capabilities by phone and computer. The flowmeter senses water flow through the pipes and reads on a scale printed on the side of the device, this type of unit is the pitot tube variety. They are relatively inexpensive and for the most part troublesome and inaccurate. In order to maintain proper circulation flow it is important the flowmeter is working properly. OTHER OBSERVATIONS We observed piping in need of repair both within the surge tank and leading to the pump suction. This piping is not subject to immediate failure but is in need of replacement to prevent any unscheduled downtime. The hair and lint primary strainer, prior to the pump, is old and most likely exceeded it's serviceability. It is part of the pump assembly and should be I EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER POOL TREATMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION WTI PROJECT#97001.0 2 WATER 'j Is TECHNOLOGY, INC. replaced with the pump. It would be our recommendation to investigate the possibility of using a 1750 rpm pump and an updated fiberglass strainer assembly that would provide longer cycles and greater serviceability. RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF PROBABLE COSTS The goal of this entire exercise is to improve air and water quality in the Natatorium and provide a safe and pleasant environment in and out of the water. In this particular situation, it is our opinion, that air quality seriously effects the water quality. This is not an uncommon occurrence due to the fact that gases escape from the pool surface while the chlorine is working, if not, they can hover at the water surface causing odors, respiratory problems, and ultimately be reabsorbed into the water causing a never ending cycle. It is imperative that the air system is improved in this facility, based upon that statement, and assuming that the air quality will be brought to the proper levels. WTI has the following recommendations for pool improvements from minimum to a full ozone treatment system. OPTION 1 - MINIMUM RECOMMENDATIONS: Assuming the HVAC system will be repaired, we will propose the very minimum modifications in the pool systems. These changes will result in a limited extension of life but; moreover, will result in lower maintenance time required. • Change liquid chlorine system to calcium hypo tablet dry feeders. • Change Chemtrol chemical unit to a Stranco system 4 model • Perform minimum plumbing changes in mechanical space • Add new Signet flowmeter with wall mount readout Estimated Cost of Option 1 $20,000 OPTION 2 - IN ADDITION TO PERFORMING THE ABOVE LISTED CHANGES, WE FURTHER RECOMMEND: Changing the filters and pump system. The advantage of doing this would be to take the opportunity to increase the frequency of water turnover. The existing turnover is approximately 6 hour, the proposed rate would be 5 hours. We have calculated the velocities in the existing pool perimeter and suction piping, and it could accommodate the additional flow. By changing the flow this would require increased size for the filters. The filters we would recommend are fiberglass vinylester, which are extremely durable and ozone resistant (which may be important in the future). EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER POOL TREATMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION WTI PROJECT#97001.0 3 T CHNOLOGY, INC. The pump system proposed is a 1750 rpm model, epoxy coated with a new hair and lint strainer. The changes proposed in Option 1 and Option 2 would provide increased performance and a long term extension of service. Estimated Cost of Option 2, also Includes Option 1 $65,000.00 OPTION 3 - PRE-FILTRATION OZONATION: 111 In addition to those improvements in Option 1 and Option 2 the maximum benefit in water treatment and disinfecting would be to add a prefiltration ozone system. The advantages are many along with the benefits to the water and the air quality in the facility. The ozone is injected prior to filtration and held in a contact vessel for a predetermined time, during which all organisms are destroyed and particles are coagulated. The water then flows into the filter which removes the contaminants and particles along with the ozone. Because high levels of ozone 1111 enter the filter it is necessary that the filter be constructed of ozone resistant materials. 111 All of the treatment takes place in the vessels and filters, ozone is never allowed to return into the pool. The proposed system would use small amounts of chlorine in the pool as a residual. If the ozone system was chosen it would be added at a future date and all of the work in Option 1 and Option 2 were completed, the ozone system could be added quite easily if it was pre-planned. There may be some additional cost in Option 2 to accomplish this. Estimated Cost Option 3, in Addition to Option 2 $73,000.00 to $110,000.00 U U EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER POOL TREATMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION WTI PROJECT#97001.0 4 WATER TECHNOLOGY, INC. • .. II. ..,-, k . ,. ill , Ozone Treatment Systems f firr. . . _ µ G }y II - , , _,..--.-.. ::::,:‘,„ . . ! ,,,friitori:). --c....„,,/,.., 7,-,..,N.i 'il l ;1 Pf, A'�iY OA , ...Cri ► !i° YY i it' i , The integration of ozone N.:. y g j tos: ti ;11;i: ' ®. i's _ systems into the overall water - _ ii treatment at aquatic facilities •i,mit: i ._ is gaining acceptance in North - ,'1� ® . < � America. Water Technology, , !� T } Inc. was among the first U.S. .,, - �-.- "� 3 J ! I i- St companies to champion this_. application, designing and ' Aimplementing ozone systems _ •" - pt_ .- Iiii for pool and spa water treat- ment. Right:Manometers,part ="`" 0 ,� !fit �+ •• The advantages of ozone in- i of the ozone injection ' t r.111 •'s clude rapid oxidation,strong disin- process. Inset:Full Flow fection and enhanced floccula- Ozonation,Side Stream - ` -f- tion,resulting in clearer and cleaner Injection with Filter 1111 Freeboard Contacting. - �, water for the bather. _ NO* • Ozone is the most powerful oxidant available for water treat- ment. It will oxidize both organic Dosage 11 and inorganic substances more Ozone is beneficial even at low impurities.Ozone dosage and con rapidly and thoroughly than concentrations. Higher applied tact time are the two most impor- chemicals. dosages achieve outstanding tant criteria when evaluating an II •Microbiological contaminants, water quality, but may require installation. such as bacteria,viruses,spores additional space for equipment Dissolved ozone must be de- and algae are inactivated—or and larger initial capital expen- stroyed before the treated water is killed — up to 100 times faster ditures. returned to the pool.The same rule with ozone than with chlorine. The major difference between holds for offgas prior to venting to •The reaction of ozone with systems is the portion of the recir- the atmosphere. II water-borne substances results culatedwaterthatcomesincon- The proper design of an ozona- in microflocculation—the lump- tact with the dissolved ozone. tion system requires knowledge of II ing together of tiny suspended Full Ozonation implies treatment the treatment process, ozone particles. The result is more effi of all recirculated water, usually chemistry, materials and the spe- cient removal in the filter. prior to filtration. cial components employed. This Slip Stream Systems, often re- ensuressafe,reliable operation and • w such undesirable ferred to as side stream ozonation full bather satisfaction. substances suchaschloramines, systems, expose only a fraction Whether the choice is a full ozo- The disinfection provided byII of the filter flow to ozone. In both nation system in compliance with ozone allows pools to operate with lower levels of residual sani- processes the ozone gas is dis the strictest ozone code—the Ger- solved into the water through a man DIN standard—or aslipstream tizers. venturi injector. system,Water Technology has the II • ozonation does not produce experience and know-how, to some of the hazardous by-prod- Design Criteria achieve optimal results from con- ucts, such as THMs, commonly The dissolved ozone needs suf- cept to completion. 1 associated with chlorination. ficientcontacttime to react with q CONSULTING ENGINEERS ERICKSEN ELLISON N and Associates Inc. 2635 UNIVERSITY AVE W • SUITE 200 • ST.PAUL,MN 55114-1500 TEL 612.641.0311 FAX 612.641.0029 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY POOL HVAC SYSTEM SURVEY EVALUATION REPORT EEA PROJECT NO. 4218 MARCH 7, 1997 Purpose The purpose of the survey was to gather data and operating information to facilitate a technical analysis of the existing pool heating and ventilating system. Survey Findings The existing air handling system was designed to provide a total circulation air flow rate of 16,700 cubic feet per minute (CFM). This flow rate corresponds to 4.3 air changes per hour. The design intent for introduction of outdoor air was difficult to determine from the design documents available. When the system was new, we believe it had the capability to introduce approximately 25% outdoor air or about 4,000 cfm. The heating and ventilating system is in poor condition. It has experienced many repairs and will continue to require repair at an increasing rate. The performance of the system is not up to original specifications and decreased capacities were measured. Inconsistent flow rates were measured at the same control settings which indicate the control system is in poor condition. Comparison to Current Design Standards Design standards for pool room ventilation have changed since the design of the facility. Current Minnesota Code embraces the recommendations of the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). These standards recommend a circulation rate of 6 to 8 air changes per hour or 30,000 cfm for the pool room to achieve 8 air changes. - Outdoor air introduction is recommended to be 5,000 cfm as a minimum. System Performance Related to Indoor Air Quality The lack of sufficient total air circulation rate and insufficient introduction of outdoor air results in poor indoor air quality. /0 rum Eden Prairie Community Pool EEA Project No. 4218 March 7, 1997 Page 2 Low air flow in the pool room does not properly flush the airborne chemical contaminants from the layer of air above the water surface. Low outdoor introduction does not clean the pool room air of the airborne pollutants. Recommendations We recommend the existing heating and ventilating system be replaced with a new system which will: • Provide 8 full air changes per hour, total recirculation rate amounting to 30,000 cfm. • Provide 11/2 times the recommended minimum amount of outdoor air amounting to 7,500 cfm. The new system would include: • Air handling unit with heating coil and air filters to provide total recirculation rate of 30,000 cfm. • Ventilation air supply unit with heat recovery heat exchanger and direct fired heating section to provide minimum outdoor air rate of 7,500 cfm. This unit will include supply and exhaust fans. • Additional supply and return distribution ductwork to supplement the existing duct system in the pool room. An alternative would be to rebuild the existing system. However, the system performance would fall short of the recommended ventilation and outdoor air rates by 40 to 45 percent and would not improve the indoor air quality. Cost Estimate An estimate of probable cost to install the new recommended system would be in the $275,000 to $325,000 range. An estimate of probable cost to rebuild the existing heating and ventilation system would be in the $75,000 to $100,000 range. Operating Cost Increase An estimate of increase in operating cost to provide the greater ventilation rate is approximately $4,500 per year. EETA s: I Eden Prairie Community Pool EEA Project No. 4218 March 7, 1997 Page 3 Other Issues • The existing HVAC systems serving the first floor and meeting rooms A and B appear to have capacity with minimal revisions to accommodate limited expansion of the lobby and locker rooms and the development of a fitness room. 12 ,E MEMORANDUM TO: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission FROM: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks,Recreation& Facilities DATE: March 11, 1997 SUBJECT: Updated Ten Year Capital Improvement Program 1996-2005 BACKGROUND: City staff is presently in the process of evaluating five and ten-year projections for the City budget. In order to assist this process, staff have provided a Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program for acquisition and development of the park system that projects an acquisition and development schedule that would anticipate some use of general funds. These items may be funded within the next ten years depending on park dedication fees (staff have projected $500,000 a year), the City's ability to obtain grants for some of the proposed acquisition and development projects, and the ability to pass a referendum proposed in 2001. These figures are merely estimates of costs. They are not based on plans or specifications. The final costs could vary significantly based on the program approved by the City Council. ACQUISITIONS: Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area- $1,719,000 The City purchased the Klein/Peterson property, a total of 68.76 acres, at $18,000/acre for a price of$1,237,620.60. This property was purchased on a contract for deed with $500,000 down in 1995 and the balance paid over a five-year period with the final payment being made in February of the year 2000. The City has applied for a $150,000 grant to acquire option parcel number one, a 15.68 acre parcel that the Klein/Peterson property owners have agreed to sell at $18,500/acre in 1996, for a total of$290,080. City staff recommends acquisition of this site over a two-year period of 1997 and 1998 using cash park fees and the State grant. The plan does anticipate acquiring the 30.28 acre parcel under Option#2 for$22,000/acre in the year 2000 for a total of$666,358. The year 2000 is the last year of the option on that property. The plan anticipates obtaining a $200,000 grant in the year 2000 and acquiring the parcel over a two year period. Cedar Forest Park-(land in lieu of park fees) The City anticipates acquiring 10 to 15 acres for a neighborhood park to serve the Cedar Forest/Hilltop neighborhood. The City has evaluated several sites south and east of the Hilltop and Cedar Forest neighborhoods. Staffhave also had discussions with representatives of Lynn Charlson regarding the possibility of acquiring land east of Eden Prairie Road for a neighborhood park to serve that section of the community. Due to the large land holdings of Mr. Charlson, the City may consider acquiring land in lieu of park fees for approximately 100 acres of development in that neighborhood. Staff anticipates development decisions on this area by 1998. 1 Smetana Lake Park- (land in lieu of cash park fees) The City of Eden Prairie and the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District have entered into an agreement titled the Smetana Lake Improvement Project, which would stabilize the water level of Smetana Lake through the development of an outlet control structure. The project would also anticipate constructing a trail around Smetana Lake and, at one time, anticipated acquisition of land owned by Frank Smetana, Sr. on the north shore of Smetana Lake. Developer's have discussed a possible request to change the Guide Plan from office and industrial to a multi family designation on the north shore of Smetana Lake. If a multi family development is approved, staff would recommend acquiring a sufficient amount of land to provide a park to serve this area, as there is no park or any other recreation facilities to serve a proposed multi family development within the area bounded by 494 and Highway 212. Staff recommends delaying any decisions on acquisition of land for park purposes in this area until a final decision is made on land use north of Smetana Lake. Land dedication in lieu of park fees may be the most feasible alternative for providing a park in this location. Staff anticipates development of this area by 1997. Riley Creek Linear Park- $100,000 Staff have projected a $100,000 expenditure in 1999 for land along Riley Creek. Staff believe it is prudent to anticipate some expenditure for land along the creek, as there are several parcels that will have to be acquired by the City to complete a trail from County Road 1 to the Riley Creek Woods. The majority of that property should be acquired through dedication when adjacent land is developed; however,there are a couple of small parcels that are owned by single family homes that will have to be acquired to develop a trail along the creek. Staff anticipates that when the Peterson property is developed there will be a demand for a trail along Riley Creek both to the north to connect to Riley Lake Park and to the east to connect to Riley Creek Woods. PARK DEVELOPMENT: Community Center- $2,965,000 Ninety thousand dollars is budgeted to replace the dasher board system in rink one at the Community Center in 1996. The park fund should be reimbursed from the general fund over the next five years for this maintenance expenditure, as well as the dehumidifcation expenditures of$69,000 in 1995. The Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the City find some funding method to improve the locker rooms. The Council authorized an architect's study and proposal to expand the locker rooms and approved the locker room expansion and front entry expansion plan, but did not authorize funding at this time. Staff indicated that there will be demand for expansion of locker facilities, improvements to the entry, and construction of a gymnasium at the Community Center in the near future. Hopefully,the City planning team will work with the bond counsel and devise a future projection on when it will be feasible to have another park bond issue without raising the levy rate, or the City may consider selling a portion of the entry at the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area and use those funds for this addition. The estimated cost for expansion of the entry and of the locker rooms is$900,000. Construction of two gymnasiums would add an additional 1.5 million dollars. 2 1L' • The heating and ventilation system for the swimming pool was under designed with the original building. As competitive swim teams grow larger, the inability of the heating and ventilatins system to provide a sufficient amount of fresh air has become more evident. City staff is recomemnding a replacement and upgrading of the hearing and ventilation system for the swimmign pool in 1997 at a cost of$375,000, and installation of an ozone system in 1998 at an estimated cost of$100,000. Round Lake Park- $350,000 Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted for lighting the baseball field in 1998. The City has only six regulation size baseball fields and one of those (the field at CMS) will be lost in the near future. The City does not have any additional fields projected;therefore, the only method to meet the demand for regulation size baseball fields will be to light some of the facilities already owned. The City will not be able to light the field at Flying Cloud ballfields and it would be very difficult to light the field at Franlo due to the proximity of residential homes to that field. The ballfield at Miller Park is already lighted;therefore, the next most likely field to be lighted is the City owned field at Round Lake Park. This field is located in the center of the park relatively far away from adjacent homes but would still face opposition from neighbors. Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1997 for replacement of the playground structure in Round Lake Park with an accessible facility. Due to the proximity of the sand beach and the high volume of use, this facility is relatively worn out and will have to either be replaced or removed within the next two years. An additional$50,000 was designated in ADA funding for making this facility accessible. This project will be completed in early 1997. The trail around Round Lake should be widened to 12 feet to accommodate two-way bicycle, roller blade and pedestrian traffic. The project is proposed for 2002 at a cost estimate of$200,000. Staring Lake Park- $625,000 Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1997 for renovation of the playground facilities. This estimate would include bringing the structure up to today's safety guidelines, accommodating ADA access to portions of the facilities,replacing the rock walls with conventional concrete retaining walls, and installing a drainage system to eliminate erosion problems. Twenty-five thousand is budgeted in 1996 to move the archery range to the Flying Cloud Riding Arena site and to replace it with an eight-court horseshoe court. (The horseshoe league will move to this facility in 1997.) The trail around the lake will have to be widened to accommodate bicycle, roller blade and pedestrian traffic. A cost estimate of$450,000 is projected for 2003. Riley Lake Park- $275,000 In 1992 the City passed a referendum that included $500,000 for improvements to Riley Lake Community Park. Development of this park was delayed until 1994 to coordinate road construction with the Bear Path Development. Park construction began in June of 1994 and will be completed in 3 /c 1996 with the installation of four volleyball courts and the final landscape material; however, construction of playground equipment is not scheduled until 1997 and a park shelter is not budgeted until 1998. Two hundred thousand dollars is budgeted in 1998 for construction of a seasonal park shelter that will accommodate groups of up to 100 and will be available for park reservation use. Miller Park- $1,210,000 A 1992 bond referendum included$3,800,000 for improvements to Miller Park. Two hundred and thirty thousand dollars (the balance of the 1992 referendum funds) is scheduled for completion of Miller Park in 1996 and includes developing a park shelter that will accommodate a summer playground program, winter warming house program and small group picnic reservations. The funds will also be used for developing a parking lot, a skating rink and a hockey rink. Two hundred thirty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1998 for construction of a picnic pavilion in the wooded area, large enough to accommodate groups of 200 for picnic reservations, etc. on a May through mid October seasonal use. This budget would have to be increased if the Council decides to have a year round facility. Two hundred fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in the year 2001 for construction of a softball complex building(restrooms, concession, and storage facility). Two hundred fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 2002 for a soccer/football facility building (concession,restrooms, storage facility). Two hundred fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in the year 2003 for a baseball building/seating area. This facility is projected to be a covered seating area similar to the old style baseball park with concession, restrooms, and storage facility constructed under the seating area. Purgatory Creek Recreation Area- $1,820,000 A $20,000 grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the outlet control structure will be utilized in 1996 and $500,000 is budgeted in 1997, $1,000,000 in 1998, and $250,000 in 1999 for the City's matching portion of the Purgatory Creek Recreation Area. This $4,000,000 project is projected to begin in 1997. The Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District will fund approximately 3.2 million dollars of this $4,000,000 project. The 1.8 million dollars is budgeted under the tax increment financing program. Birch Island Park- $150,000 One hundred fifty-thousand dollars is budgeted in 1999 to construct a seasonal park shelter to accommodate small groups, to provide playground equipment to serve the neighborhood, and to improve the parking lot to a hard surface. rr /4 Ij Preserve Park- $250,000 Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1999 for construction of a park shelter and grading a free skating rink to accommodate the revised park and renovating the playstructure. The existing park shelter is falling apart and the use of the pond as a skating rink results in extremely poor quality ice and shortened season to due to the springs in that pond. The playstructure is ranked as one of the most dangerous is the system. Prairie View Park- $200,000 Two hundred thousand dollars is budgeted in 2000 for replacing the park shelter that was destroyed by fire in 1995. The City purchased a portable shelter for the interim. Pheasant Woods Park - $50,000 Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1996 for replacing the playground equipment, repairing the backstop, park benches, etc. Edenbrook Conservation Area - $155,000 Fifty five-thousand dollars is budgeted in 1999 for construction of a small parking lot access and trail head for the conservation area. The trail will be a turf trail with some woodchip sections in low areas. The estimated cost for the trail construction is $100,000. Rice Marsh Lake Park- $110,000 Ten thousand dollars is budgeted in 1996 for finish grading, seeding, and landscaping. Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1997 for installation of a backstop and playground structure. Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1998 for construction of the tennis courts, basketball court, and final landscaping of this park. Miller Spring- $15,000 Fifteen thousand dollars is budgeted in 1997 for renovation of Miller Spring, which would include upgrading the parking lot and improving the design of the pedestrian access to the spring, as well as providing a flower garden and landscaping automatically watered by the spring. This location is also the trail head location the Charison prairie. This project is long overdue; however, the staff has delayed the project due to concerns about affecting Miller Spring with any major changes to the piping system, etc. Cedar Forest Park- $250,000 Fifty thousand dollars was budgeted in Cedar Forest Park for the year 2000 for initial grading and seeding of that park. Two hundred thousand dollars is budgeted over the next two years for park development. 5 Crestwood Park- $375,000 Twenty five-thousand dollars was budgeted in 1997 for grading and seeding Crestwood Park. Fifty thousand dollars is also budgeted for 1998 for installation of the backstop and playstructure. Fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1999 for construction of the tennis courts, basketball court, and parking lot. Two hundred fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 2000 for construction of the warming house and hockey rink. Topview Park- $10,000 Ten thousand dollars is budgeted for preschool age play equipment at Topview Park. Forest Hills Park- $200,000 Two hundred thousand dollars is budgeted in 2001 for replacement of the park shelter/warming house. Smetana Lake Park- $100,000 One hundred thousand dollars is budgeted in 1997 for the City's match for the Smetana Lake Improvement Project. Additional funding may be necessary for park development depending on what type of development is approved and the type of park facilities that will be needed to serve that development. Flying Cloud Ballfields - $190,000 Twenty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1997 for the City's match on a $57,000 irrigation and fencing project to complete irrigating the soccer fields, softball fields, and baseball fields at Flying Cloud Fields. The Soccer Association has committed to provide $17,000 toward this project and the Baseball Association has committed to providing $20,000 toward this project. Twenty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1998 for placement of fill and relocating the airport security fence in order to accommodate the proposed new road system and parking areas around the perimeter of the Flying Cloud Field Complex. One hundred and fifty thousand dollars is budgeted in 1999 for installing the new road system and parking lot around the perimeter of Flying Cloud Ballfields. This should accommodate the grading and placement of Class V in this area. If the new road system and parking lot is to be paved, the general fund would have to provide some additional support for this project, or some other source of funding. 6 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL CONSTRUCTION PARK AND OPEN SPACE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION Rice Marsh Lake Trail- $160,000 Construction of a trail from Rice Marsh Lake Neighborhood Park to existing trail on the north side of the lake is estimated to cost$10,000. The trail around the east and south side of the lake will be connected to the trail along the west wide of Bearpath Golf Course when the City receives a trail easement or title to the property necessary to make the connections. This trail will eventually go under Highway 212. The estimated cost is$150,000, and the estimated timetable will depend on the development of Highway 212. • Lower Purgatory Creek Valley Trail - $300,000 The trail along Purgatory Creek from County Road 1 south to Riverview Road will require a minimum of five bridges crossing Purgatory Creek. This pedestrian trail may first be developed as a turf trail with some woodchip sections,but may eventually be developed as an aglime trail similar to the trail in the lower portions of Nine-Mile Creek in Bloomington. This trail section should be initiated when the final portions of trail easement or land ownership is required. The estimated fist phase cost is $300,000. Hidden Ponds - $25,000 The trail within the outlot of Hidden Ponds first should be replaced in 1997 with an eight-foot wide aglime or recycled asphalt trail. For several years, residents have complained about the narrow conditions of the tail over the underpass along Anderson Lakes Parkway. The underpass should be lengthened to widen the trail. Estimated cost $30,000. CONSIDERATIONS: The cost estimates (guess estimates) are not based on specific plans or with developed specifications; therefore, Commission and Council members should expect that actual costs of estimates obtained after drafting plans or more detailed programs are developed may vary considerably from these estimates. The City receives petitions from neighborhoods, special interest groups, etc. each year that may change priorities; therefore, this CIP is reviewed and revised on an annual basis. The value of the CIP is to provide the Commission and Council with a "general view" of the revenue and expenditures over the next five-years in order to help make decisions regarding projects that will occur over the next six months. BL:mdd CIPMemoBob 7 '9 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3/1$L27 SECTION: Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources ITEM NOK 2- DEPARTMENT: PRN/R, ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposed Policy on Priority Use of CityFacilities Bob Lambert,Director DRAFT POLICY: The following draft policy establishing guidelines for priority use of public facilities is based on a similar policy established by the City of St. Louis Park several years ago, and from input received at a meeting of Eden Prairie Athletic Association representatives on January 13, 1997. PURPOSE AND INTENT: The purpose of this policy which establishes guidelines for the priority use of parks and facilities in the City of Eden Prairie is to provide for health, safety and welfare of the public. It is the intent of this policy to grant priority use for exclusive or ongoing use of municipal park property to those organizations which operate programs under the same general guidelines which govern public programs operated by the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Department. REQUIREMENTS OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT RECEIVE FREE OR PRIORITY USAGE RATES FOR LEAGUE USE OF PARK FACILITIES: Organizations which request special permits to offer ongoing programs on municipal property without paying a usage fee,or at priority usage rates, are required to comply with the following guidelines: 1. Organizations must be Eden Prairie,non profit,public service groups. "Eden Prairie" is defined as located or based in Eden Prairie. "Non profit" means a not for profit organization as defined by state statutes. "Public service group" is defined as a group organized to provide a public service to the entire community, or all individuals in the community within the age group being served. 2. Organizations are to deposit a copy of all bylaws or documents which govern their operation at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Department, so that those documents may be available for public review. 3. Organizations are to make all information concerning the governance of their programs available to participants upon request. 4. Meetings of the organization's governing body, except those which deal with personnel issues or litigation, are to be publicized in advance and open to participation to all program participants. 1 5. The election of the organization's governing body is to be a process which is open to all program participants. 6. Head coaches working in youth sport organizations are to be trained and/or certified through a program deemed appropriate by the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Department. This training will address values, safety and liability. 7. Organizations are to be adequately prepared for dealing with participants that have special economic, physical or social needs. 8. Organizations are not to discriminate against program participants or applicants in any manner. REQUIREMENTS OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE PERMITS TO HOLD TOURNAMENTS ON MUNICIPAL PARK PROPERTY: 1. Organizations must be Eden Prairie,non profit public service groups. "Eden Prairie" is defined as located or based in Eden Prairie. "Non profit" means a not for profit organization as defined by state state statutes. "Public service group" is defined as a group organized to provide a public service to the entire community, or all individuals in the community within the age group being served. REQUIREMENTS OF TEAMS NOT AFFILIATED WITH AN EDEN PRAIRIE NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION REQUESTING RESERVATION OF FIELD USAGE: 1. Team must be composed of a minimum of 50%Eden Prairie residents. 2. Field reservations will be limited to their home games only,or their team practices with a maximum of one time per week. 3. Fees will be based on direct costs to the City. 4. Permit required. REQUIREMENTS OF GROUPS FOR SINGLE USE REQUESTS: (i.e.,Eden Prairie Cub Scout Groups, Eden Prairie Church Groups,Eden Prairie Neighborhood Groups,Eden Prairie Businesses) 1. Fifty percent of the participants must either live or work in Eden Prairie. 2. Fees will be based on direct costs to the City. 3. Permit required. 2 2. PRIORITIES: Organizations that meet the above stated guidelines that are requesting special permits for single use or to offer ongoing programs on municipal property will be granted the opportunity based on the following use schedule, and within the adopted standards for number of uses per team. Priority I: City Programs(Examples: summer recreation programs, lesson programs,open swim, special events open to the entire community.) Priority II: School District 272 Programs(Examples: curriculum programs, interscholastic team practices,games, tournaments, etc.) Priority III: Youth teams (18 and under) that are members of non profit organizations that have the following guaranteed in their bylaws: • 95%Eden Prairie residents. (Eden Prairie residents are defined as individuals who live in Eden Prairie or who go to school in Eden Prairie. Any non residents who don't attend Eden Prairie schools will pay a non resident fee to be established by the City Council.) • Association or club is a non profit organization as defined by state statute. • The Association or Club must file a financial statement with the City each year that will be made public upon request. This statement must indicate revenue,expenditures and fund balances. • Association is open to all Eden Prairie residents and must offer equal opportunities for participation. • All board meetings are open to the public with parents of participants able to vote on board members. • The organization must have an open process for parents to discuss concems or recommend changes to the organization. • Teams are playing during the designated"primary season." • Priority III teams when scheduling tournaments will be charged a fee based on applicable tournament fee. Priority IV: Eden Prairie non profit public service groups who use the facilities to raise money for the benefit of the entire community. Applicable tournament fees apply. Priority V: Businesses and neighborhood groups located in Eden Prairie during the designated primary season. Applicable tournament/league fees and guidelines will apply. Priority VI: Non profit youth teams or organizations that have 75% or more Eden Prairie residents during the designated primary season. Applicable tournament fees and guidelines apply. Priority VII: Non profit adult teams or organizations that have 75% or more Eden Prairie residents during the designated primary season. Eden Prairie adult "residents" must either live or work in Eden Prairie. Applicable tournament fees apply. Priority VIII: Private schools and churches located in Eden Prairie during the designed primary season. Applicable tournament,league fees and guidelines will apply. 3 Priority IX: Priority III teams during a secondary season. A fee for a secondary season will be charged based on costs to the City. Applicable tournament fees apply. Priority X: All other Eden Prairie teams on a first come, first serve basis after higher priority teams have had an opportunity to schedule each season. All teams must be composed of at least 50% Eden Prairie residents and requests must be made by an Eden Prairie resident. Eden Prairie adult "residents"must either live or work in Eden Prairie. Applicable fees and guidelines will apply. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES: • Fees will be subject to change each year depending on actual cost to provide the services requested. Associations will be notified of fee changes approximately six months in advance of any change. • The City will establish dates each year by which teams must commit requests for field reservation use in order to utilize their priority status. After that date fields or facilities will be reserved on a first come, first served basis. City will only authorize reservations with one field coordinator per organization. • If teams or organizations are at the same priority level,then the team or organization that serves the highest number of Eden Prairie residents will receive the higher priority status in terms of field,pool,rink and court reservations. • Only Eden Prairie non profit public service groups or Eden Prairie youth organizations that are non profit can reserve facilities for tournaments, clinics, or other uses where a fee will be charged to teams,individuals, etc. • No more than one major tournament or special event will be scheduled at any one time. • Any organization which fails to provide for and follow the guidelines set forth above, or provides false information on a permit application,is subject to revocation of its permit at the discretion of the Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources. • No organization would be allowed to sublease City facilities without City approval. The City would not authorize subleasing for profit,or for programs that compete with City programs. STANDARDS: STANDARDS FOR USE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES .::.. .:..::.: .isifrhogrreas ..:...:..:....gave!Ted Grade : :;jin has T a :, brad.,>;::: Baseball Fields& May 1 to July 30 12&over—4 per week 8&over—3 per week Softball Fields 11 &under—3 per week 8&under—2 per week Soccer Fields May 1 to July 30 under 12&over—3 per week under 10&over-3 per week under 10&under—2 per week under 9 and under—2 per week Football Fields Aug 15 to Oct 30 7th grade&over—4 per week 6th grade&under—3 per week Basketball Courts Nov 1 to Mar 15 7th grade&over-4 per week 6th grade&over—3 per week 6th grade&under—3 per week 5th grade&under—2 per week 4 q Clses t'er ee Volleyball Courts Sept 10 to Nov 15 7th grade&over-4 per week 6th grade&over—3 per week 6th grade&under-3 per week 5th grade&under—2 per week Wrestling Room Nov 1 to Mar 30 K-8th grade-4 per week Outdoor Rinks Dec 15-Feb 15 all ages-3 per week all ages- 1 per week Definitions Uses Per Week—defined as the number of times a team plays each week. If the team is practicing, it may require a field by itself. If the team is playing an out of town team, it will require a field by itself. If it is playing another Eden Prairie team, it will only require a "half use" for each team. Teams under 10 will generally only require a 1%2 hour time period. Teams over 10 may require 2 hours or more to play a game. These standards represent the maximum uses per week that the City would allocate any club or association provided facilities were available to accommodate their request. BL:mdd . Policy.memoBob97 5 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday,March 3, 1997 Development Department; a staff report dated February 7, 1997, from Scott Kipp, Senior Planner; Minutes dated September 30, 1996, from Kodet Architectural Group; a letter dated February 6, 1997, from Wallace Hilgren, Westech Business Center; and a memo dated February 6, 1997, from Eugene Dietz, Director of Public Works. (Commissioner Kracum was excused at 9:00 p.m.) Fox said this project has already gone before the Planning Commission and the City Council. There are no natural resource issues for the Commission to review. Staff feels the Commission should be informed about this facility since it will be housing the park maintenance staff. He reviewed the development proposal including the site plan, building elevations, and the landscaping plan. Hilgeman was concerned about Mr. Hilgren's concern about the City proposing to add a metal building addition, and asked why the City is using metal. Lambert replied it meets City Code and it does have less metal than the school bus garage. Koenig commented about spending $22,000 on landscaping. Fox indicated there will be retaining walls that are going to be expensive and it's included in the landscaping cost. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Review Proposed Revisions to Policy on Public Use of City Facilities Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated February 7, 1997, from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources. Lambert reviewed the changes to the draft policy as stated in the memo. He noted under administrative procedures, he added... pool, rink, and court reservations. Staff will be adding other things as they go along. He also recommended adding the statement.. that there shall be no subleasing of reserved facilities without City approval and the City would not allow subleasing for profit or for programs that compete with City programs. The example given was if the swim club buys up all the pool time then subleases it to somebody that wanted to run swimming lessons. Tom Bierman suggested staff include a couple of examples of what Priority I City programs are. He commented about fees being established by the City Council and recommended including under administrative notes when those I 1 Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday,March 3, 1997 fees will be established. Lambert said if the City is going to recommend an increase in fees for any athletic association, they do that during their discussions of planning the budget. Staff will be planning the 1998 budget starting next month. If there is a recommendation to increase fees, they will ask the City Council to adopt it in June or July and it will go into effect in January. Bierman said a Priority III rule is you must file a financial statement. It should be clarified to say once a year. He was concerned about Priority V because he felt all of the criteria required in Priority III were extremely important and if groups weren't following them all they should be at the bottom of the priority list.. Lambert concurred with Bierman. After discussion concerning Priority V, the Commission could not find a purpose for it and agreed to omit it. Bierman was concerned that Priority VI has priority above everything else that has requirements that it be at least 75 percent Eden Prairie residents. He believed Priority VI belonged at the bottom. He said it's a lot higher than it should be. Lambert explained that the neighborhood groups are 100 percent Eden Prairie residents and businesses are located in Eden Prairie. He recommended moving private schools and churches down to Priority X and leaving businesses and neighborhood groups at Priority VI. Ken Bomben, Eden Prairie Soccer Association, referred to the February 5, 1997 draft policy, page 2, item 5. He was concerned because he thought there was additional language not included. Lambert said they discussed adding to it but didn't agree with it. Voting should be open to all program participants' parents, giving all the information on all of the candidates, to everybody, and let everybody vote. There could be restrictions or requirements on who is eligible to run for office. Discussion continued about combining Priority IX and Priority X, and the appropriate wording to show 95 percent Eden Prairie residents would have priority over 75 percent Eden Prairie residents. MOTION: Brown moved, seconded by Koenig, to accept staffs recommendations for modification to the policy of priority use of facilities with the changes suggested this evening. Motion carried 6-0. B. Request Approval to Advertise for Bids on Mighty Duck Grant Proposal Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated February 18, 1997, from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities; and a letter dated /* TiOn March 17, 1997 To the Mayor and Eden Prairie City Council Members City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: Over the past several months, Bob Lambert and the Parks and Rec Commission have worked very hard to develop a policy on "Priority Use of Facilities"for approval and use by the City. In general, the policy addresses and meets the needs of most youth sports programs in Eden Prairie. However, the overall policy tries to deal with every youth program in the same manner. While this approach may seem equitable on the surface, it fails to address the specific differences between swim programs and other youth organizations such as baseball, hockey or soccer. The policy that has been forwarded to the City Council for approval places the Foxjet Swim Club at a Priority XI level. This is the lowest priority level stated in the policy as proposed. Under the current policy, a 10 person swim group could be formed with all Eden Prairie residents and receive Priority Ill status (95% residency requirement). If this group rented pool time at the Eden Prairie Community Center from 6:00pm to 7:00pm five days per week, it would effectively make it very difficult for the Foxjet program, serving 163 Eden Prairie residents, to serve our membership and survive. In order to avoid this situation and serve the best needs of the Community and our Swim Team, the Eden Prairie Foxjet Swim Club requests that the City grant a variance to the 95% residency requirement proposed for Priority III teams. We believe that this is a reasonable request for the following reasons: A. The Foxjet Swim Cub has been part of the Eden Prairie community for the past 15 years. The Club has always maintained a high percentage of Eden Prairie resident members on our team_ The Club has been and always will be open to all Eden Prairie residents. The Foxjet Swim Club is a family-based Eden Prairie organization that provides a team swimming experience for beginning to experienced swimmers, age 5 to college. The Foxjets promote swimming and the values of athletics such as physical fitness, fun, perseverance, goal setting and discipline. The main goal of C. The Foxjet Swim Club currently pays the City of Eden Prairie over $20,000.00 per year in pool rental fees, which help offset the costs of running and maintaining the current pool facilities. Foxjets have helped the City utilize and pay for their pool facilities for the past 15 years. D. Passing the current 95% residency provision without considering the special circumstances involved in running a swim program may not serve the best interests of the community at large. As stated above, the situation could arise where a team of 10 Eden Prairie resident swimmers (100% residency) would qualify under the current policy as the higher priority team, even though the Foxjet team serves over 160 Eden Prairie residents. We cannot imagine how this would serve the best interests of the community, both in terms of generating pool rental income, or serving the swimming needs of the largest number of Eden Prairie residents. We respectfully request, that the City Council adjust the proposed policy for swim clubs as follows: A. Reduce the Priority Ill residency percentage requirement for swim clubs to 70%. This would reduce the membership adjustments necessary for our Club to achieve residency compliance at the Priority III level. At this percentage level, we would still need to increase our Eden Prairie membership by 21 or decrease our non-resident membership by approximately 8 swimmers. We feel this range of membership adjustment would be achievable over a reasonable time period. The original recommendation by Robert Lambert to the Park & Rec Commission asked the Commission to consider reducing the residency requirement to 75% for swim clubs. While this level is much more reasonable than the 95% requirement, it would still be very difficult for the Foxjets to achieve. The Foxjet Swim Club currently has 163 Eden Prairie resident members out of a total team enrollment of 242. This represents a 67.3% residency percentage. In order for us to achieve a 75% residency ratio, we would have to either: 1.) increase our Eden Prairie membership by 74 members, or 2.) decrease our non-resident team members by approximately 20, which would decrease our team size by that number. Asking members to leave, would not only damage our team, but would result in a loss of revenue of approximately $12,000 to $15,000 annually. Attempting to increase our team size by 74 resident members to achieve the 75% level is, at least in the short-term, unlikely. We already actively recruit members from the Eden Prairie schools. The base group of children interested in competitive swimming is small, when compared to other youth sports such as baseball, football, hockey and soccer. If you take into account the total number of Eden Prairie resident children who currently swim competitively (non-high school) in the State of Minnesota, the Foxjet Swim Club already has 90 to 95% of those children on our team. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 3/4/97 SECTION: Director of Parks, Recreatin and Facilities ITEM NO DEPARTMENT: PRNR ITEM DESCRIPTION: Flying Cloud Fields Traffic Study 'Robert A. Lambert, Director REQUEST: City staff request authorization to proceed with obtaining the additional information necessary to determine if it is feasible to proceed with the improvements recommended by the Benshoof Traffic Study. Staff would have to obtain a survey of the site,prepare and complete a grading plan in order to determine the costs for construction of the road and parking system proposed. Once this is completed, staff would then have to forward the recommendation to the Metropolitan Airports Commission to determine if they would approve expansion of the boundaries and the improvements suggested. BACKGROUND: In November of 1996, the City Council approved contracting with Benshoof and Associates for a traffic study to determine what improvements should be considered to address the safety issues caused by traffic at the entry and exit points at Flying Cloud Fields, as well as the traffic conflicts between pedestrians and automobiles within the complex. Now that the City does have a more firm commitment from the Airports Commission, that the City will have a longer term use of this property, City staff believe it is prudent to determine if the City can make any significant improvements to this site in terms of ease of access, as well as safety. The City will require the use of these ballfields to accommodate youth baseball, softball, soccer and football for the foreseeable future, and believe the sooner additional parking and safe entry and exit road systems are provided, the sooner we will alleviate a lot of frustration from Eden Prairie residents. BL:mdd FCFTS/Bob97 1 IRFBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500/EDINA, MN 55439/(612) 832-9858/FAX (612) 832-9564 February 17, 1997 REFER TO FILE: 96-81 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Lambert, CI of Eden Prairie / FROM: James A. Bensho and Peter A. Hultgren AQ7i' RE: Recommended Traffic and Parking Concept Plan for Flying Cloud Fields PURPOSE This memorandum presents our recommended concept plan for effectively meeting the traffic and parking needs at Flying Cloud Fields. A determination of the parking supply appropriate for current park activities has been made in this study and incorporated into the recommended concept plan. The capacity of the park's road system to accommodate the traffic associated with these activities has also been examined in this study. Lastly, the level of park activities which can be effectively accommodated at Flying Cloud Fields is reviewed. BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Flying Cloud Fields consists of property owned by the Metropolitan Airports Commission that is used by the City of Eden Prairie for youth athletic fields. The property is located just west of Flying Cloud Airport on CSAH 1. It is about 38 acres in size. There presently are seven softball diamonds, one full-size baseball diamond, and open field space in the park which can be divided into as many as 21 youth soccer fields. A one-way gravel circulation drive connects the park entrance at the west end of the park with the park exit at the east end of the park. Vehicle parking is accommodated along this drive. Additional parking is located in two gravel parking lots which extend south from the circulation drive, one at the west end, and a larger one at the center of the park. The total parking supply accommodates about 420 vehicles. A concession stand is located in the middle of the park along the south side of the circulation drive. Park activity peaks on weeknights during the spring and summer when up to 240 youth participate in baseball or softball activities on the eight diamonds and up to 396 youth 2 4 Mr. Bob Lambert -2- February 17, 1997 participate in soccer activities, according to athletic association estimates. Due to the park's close proximity to the airport, restrictions on lighting limit park activity to daylight hours so that the vast majority of participants arrive at about 6:00 p.m. and depart before sunset at about 8:00 p.m. Several problems associated with parking and traffic operations have come to the attention of City staff members. They have noticed that the current parking supply of about 420 vehicles is not sufficient to meet the current vehicle demand at Flying Cloud Fields. The gravel lots lack striping for parking, making the resulting parking patterns inefficient and hazardous. Traffic congestion occurs on CSAH 1 when motorists are arriving at the fields. Also, significant congestion occurs in the parking lots and at the exit to CSAH 1 during the exiting period. Staff members also have safety concerns about vehicle and pedestrian conflicts in the park. Benshoof& Associates staff observed park operations on a weeknight in October. Some traffic congestion was observed near 6:00 p.m. as vehicles arrived for the start of park activities. The single entrance lane limited the rate at which vehicles could be handled. Most vehicles arrived by 6:15 p.m. At 7:00 p.m. vehicles began leaving the park as activities finished at dark. The vehicles generally formed two lanes of exiting traffic, frequently failing to stop at the intersection. Stopped vehicles experienced lengthy delays at County Road 1 due to congestion. A significant portion of the exiting traffic violated the one-way circulation on the site by exiting at the park's entrance on the west end. The entire park was clear of vehicles by about 7:30 p.m. REVIEW OF PARKING AND TRAFFIC PARAMETERS Parking Parameters We reviewed the parking supply at several other cities' recreational fields and also reviewed industry guidelines for large parks serving organized athletic activities. The conclusion drawn from this review was that Flying Cloud Fields is used more intensely than other parks, largely due to the smaller field dimensions used in youth soccer and the resulting higher concentration of fields. The demand for parking is dependent upon the number of participants and spectators, and the mariner in which they arrive at the park. Some participants are dropped-off at the start of activities and picked-up at the end of activities. Some participants arrive in car pools with two or more participants arriving per vehicle. Many participants arrive at an occupancy rate of one participant per vehicle. Those participants not arriving by vehicle either walk or bike, but they are not believed to constitute a significant number. In addition to the arrivals of participants, there also are the arrivals of spectators. Most spectators arrive in the same vehicles as the participants, but some arrive in separate vehicles. 3 , Mr. Bob Lambert -3- February 17, 1997 As previously stated, park activity peaks with a total of about 636 youth participating in baseball, softball, and soccer. Based upon athletic association estimates of participants and how they arrive at the park, our best estimate of the parking demand at Flying Cloud Fields is 550 to 650 vehicles. A vehicle survey, expected to be taken at the park this coming season, will narrow this range and determine the specific vehicle parking demand. Traffic Parameters Multiple years of experience addressing traffic needs for the former Met Center in Bloomington have led us to conclude that there are two key factors which impact how effectively large event traffic is discharged from a site. Fundamentally, these are the number of traffic lanes and the number of routes available for traffic dispersion. Research indicates that a parking lot exit typically has a vehicle discharge rate of 800 vehicles per hour per lane.' The desired time required to clear the parking lot then becomes the determining factor in calculating the number of exit lanes required. Park users and the City of Eden Prairie will need to determine what is an acceptable clearing time. Our initial suggestion is that this time not be greater than twenty minutes. For the purpose of developing a recommended concept plan for the park, we have decided to provide four exit lanes, which will permit the clearance of 600 vehicles (expected peak demand) in less than fifteen minutes. RECOMMENDED CONCEPT PLAN The purpose of the concept plan set forth in this memorandum is to provide a basic framework for fulfilling the current needs of the park with regard to traffic and parking operations, realizing that further refinement will be necessary based upon the anticipated traffic survey this season, subsequent site engineering studies, and review of surrounding property uses and issues. Presented is a concept plan to guide the design process, with important features that should be incorporated in any subsequent final design to enable effective traffic and parking operations. Our recommended concept plan is shown in Figure 1. The plan features two access points. The east access point is located opposite Staring Lake Parkway where the present park exit is located. This access has been widened to accommodate a single entrance lane, one shared left turn and through exit lane, and one right turn exit lane. The west access point is located opposite LaRivier Court, about 200 feet west of the existing park entrance. This access also has one entrance lane, one shared left turn and through exit lane, and one right turn exit lane. Providing four exit lanes will allow all vehicles to clear from the park in less than 15 minutes. Two access points will disperse the inbound and outbound traffic movements so that they will not be concentrated on one drive as they are currently. This will help to relieve the congestion currently experienced. Right turns out of the park are expected to be the predominant exit movement, thus the provision of ' "The Analytical Approach to Entry/Exit Design,"Mary S. Smith,May-June, 1988,Parking Professional, 47-56. 4 y .�:::.,:.,�i:T...k.•.S::.:...'.!.......,,:.s.....::.�.•.5.,..;.`:......:............:•...::............�♦...:../....•....,`.+...,J?..::r.',.:..:...\.\...?....?>`a::.:...E.::..0:...:..\�.':...„..;.;.?....:i::/.........:.."'..:.:;+':.:.'..`.:.'.•.:....,...+.C`,v.:..�.;.:.•.......n}:....,:..:..iy:,{..:'.`...n;......::....vn.'.....J...,...E: .n::a:........;:....:.'.T.�..,.....:..i T....�,..:.♦.•..........v.,•....:.....�....:........:`::..:...)'...'.:.�.'...{.,....:...•:......�Y...`:...,.Y.p4......•'...!..:.`.:?;..;'......:t:�:�;''.::.�?.:.......:....;:..:...:...:::....,':.:;.....:i:...::.................:i.,::..:.:...:w.i�.....:!,.........r.�:...2...:...:..:..t.,}:..?,r:...:.':o:.i,:.:..„.{•2.....:.,..,,.'.2...,::..•.:........:...:.,...,..`'•:`)......:.a,........'...............f......::$;.....:.:.....Y`...:,.::.)::..:..:.,:..o.i.,\...`)::..:....:::....•...'n,.1......:.?+,,.::........}..t...:...........:)t...:.........,.:..b.',....::.,.•..n:...,n.........:S.a..::...y..,:.....:...::.�;....::,:4:.:.,...::.•,\Y...v.•a�....:,.:.•}:..a.v..:.':...::....).....v.......:..?.;♦,.�:.........t?...u.:v.::.a......:.....,n.t:E............¢..:.•••...«:.),L:.:r.;....:v...4.........•.:v„}........:.....:..:':..........:..;.•....4:,.v.`...n,:..........:.:\:;..:::.:...................:..?.•.:...:.:.i.�a...;...,:k``..•...f:..�.,..:...'a...:.:..\,...\.....-....:..T...:..4.u::..,:..:..:....:...;...:.....�.....:.:::.:......y,.:...t.:....v.n..:....v?,r;................J....:.....:%..•....,.:..r.....:..:......u{<v:...:.:...........):.......f...?.T.:.....,.:..:......:......:.::...:...,...:.:.:.:....� .a...i,.:...L:...;.y�:......:r.:..:........>:n•....}...:....vva v...:..�.:)............•,s,.:.:::{....,.....;...::....:..:......:..::..•:..•i....:.:.......•.:•'..::v.:.::'.......t...:;...::.n:...:•.rk:.:..:4•a......:....:.::..:......a.:..:....:.K.......:.:::..:...:n..........,.:.v..\v,,.:`.,•�...,\>.:<...n.:,\,.....:�v.?.:n.i.:;:.a{v.'.a.•t.:..?.....:.v.......;v...:.:.:...:'.``,K:.;.{._;..r:,,•:.:..(..;:'v...`..:):r...:.::s}nf/.�.Y.....;:....:..+i..f...r.::?v....:.:...::"♦Y..........n..)...:..:...::..::..,':......:,.r::s:I.....:•ti.!...•..:C.:.u...::.i,.a.:.:\:.:::.n.....:•Y,....v...:;r,)`.^...v:i,n.:..•,..i.,..?n.iYT...f•o.'......::.;.,:...�a...•..::..::..,'::).....:...:,...:\.''..:na.:..:;.s..•...:...♦. .::.u.:`K.?..:..:.::\..`.J•a.''•..•....nC...:..:....`S..; .•..':v,.. }:.:.v.:.?...::.:..:.:....:....a.::A,..:.•...:ia::.....�i."..;:.rn ....%+\�.:•.�..:a.♦...T.kR%L,.,.br y:;..v...;.a.,>LY,`.,..a....$ky:}v....A,:.•.f .:..,.:.}:;..:.S.:..'::::...1h?.i.i::..'....`Yv.r.{:.Y...:Y:;,'..::.:....::.:...,;.''..:.,,Y.:''..::::'.'..t.?�•...:.n..:::...:..•....2.:..::.Y.Jv:}!: •...:4:....:a.':•::..:.••.:.:.•)iv..:...:...:.::...,•.:....::v:C,...:.v...:.::..;:.s::.^a..:....:,C..:r�.i,v.'r:.-..:.:.'...,.:::Si...:i.:.'..?'..:?-v:.:..,%:.•.:'.' ::::..::..::1•...a<•.�„a...:.v.n.:...::.nv:a{..:...4•`.:?Ir:T;.:::,,v.'}•::......>.:3. :..:i.aJ.yv..Y:.iT.r.$;:.;:.`i:.:,'}.<v:.i...:3:'}a..r�•':hvY?.::tn:..?::'.}!:.t t.::.'.:..:�.�..;'.,::io;1.:.v;::..a;..kh.::::v..:.'v y:.,:t;..:.�,:.v:%•`:..::...:::):::}...i:....:.:i.:.r:4::f...:.ft`.c.::{`.v:;::{�H:'.:.;::n..;`.:..::..i.;.:v.•..%;::..''.:c.�?xYn\,.v•t:.'.'::,:;..:?: .::,...:..:i.':`:,:W.:.•i.S::a:"}:;.iv';:..::fv:u•.,:K.:.i�.,::f.)..i?•::.:;:f.v ;ii:`v:..`�.Y;.i :..?..\'v::;..ya:.i2i:.:.:.a:...'.v.;�:.�.a'k..::'y..in 3;k:`..'...i:+'•-4'aK.:!:..:fT v..::C:s..�^::...4;`.::.:�•}x..+:�i':`{:.�:'.:-,:;.?:':.:•:..r'::?'..xs:�`: ::•.....}Y.a.r,..'St'C,Y.:..:<",'.:�.:':.•;;:•:'Y:Y;.•. ..:•...:.,:•.•..r.1:}??,.. ,.1..r':;.:dt.:../.:.•:..:..v..:...:..;..l.: �':,-`:}t.:)i::!}:;�...•.::r,M .?n \� :t�'::•Y : :?n 1•.2Cr ` >c. � �A ) � !` i v.:t : ..":,v..:?/.: 4' }/.a • vr::. :.�..L ., : . x :ti ::En '':. : $ ., ri. � jy'{ :. ) :` 1. s. 1. 44 :v . ;Yp ?ka ?:.t , G: % fi � ��"1) , . . '.. v ..v ::. `: . . } . na _ k , � � . �?0 ..<`s:? YiG ,, . . Ta n ♦. . .::.: n :Y ;vT ti � uSi ? r9r. 1 G4 ... .. . . :. . ... . . ..kk, . ..T . . . ...:a v •:.:^yn�•,4 1� � :� !� � v/1 ,?b 0/ :+l Y.!f"« .-:-, ♦...... ' . . :. ....\ .. . .. n . . . .. .. ♦ r„•.°, , y/! I�J�f:0,. 7 �.} r/�.::n:tJ� $ : :::. .l.."Ji :{::$?L:: E' :'L n. \a:: &.`. Y. C�\N..t a . � 4 ) . v. !rY i I ➢ � Ch ! , ,.%ir'• ,:/,Cvi;-?} : : wk( � ?£2•}y � ./ %':Z `\♦%� ;: }c^^<E,'}t4?nC � ' . ' K ;Ka k .?CY. YnAa�. . :KE `f,\fSkb„ w:.a�`iR: yE; :TCT? >: wY. :n. A}'•.,-S '�/ue,i ;'� %rl i//fa.:.,faS6'�^ :{r:.Qii-Gck4tt• .�v , ,... m.v•YT..,. {. a.0 :Y ,:: n/{rv.YiRH A!�v . ?3f,k}� 2?a .7•$ .' $,�L^FC; ) •'_: {�n ,Yf :� c r : ^J:r.;:.n , (.:,Y:.v : . .:.:.\:.+':..•�vS :a�.•�o�!m � s a a 3*�'� «Y`,}a xK•. ^\ A :<5?:i, c .g� JT {. .`..\, Sv� :av ? � ..X �J �< �� Y. :v .t.:: . J::wa, .: .. F ;.n, ;4 ,`J. .ze:a{E,i:6:,aJ. i>\ W4u�:: i.,:1:: :.c.: K: i:` .:1 .: ;14. � 2 :.\�.i.i:\u ,':ii «.,a'�' , 2r *.si..'06iizw. p f,:i:y._4i \°J k.:z �:,z,:4\. �,;+i ` ::Gx` \ a ` ::mie: � 'h �,b..?Tt„ �♦.: �3 Si{'CY/� %;, ... kg l` {ha:a. «- . n<;:kv{ \'} :}.:' T {ad:: ��k:26T A /} `-'.!?.7'� f�{k, tG ..v: •f iv } \ Y„ �u.::'... :i4' !t? : ' . . 1 ,..r.•^. �:a�f♦\{�:)``�Y }\:.C; . .. \ L:: i: \v+.{ " •, a . 0.?X � •iaH c fi a ,�•t\.� fZ n^y:r �n. `�, s '.vr•0n J .:Kf '!'4+ -.?T .2, :t Y:T :!'�: : 43a:�,c Jr/ JK� \1v «,:b l 1 AK,L�y', P£hY? ` ?k$.{i; � f '3 $:i,'/ f /1a cdc�n Yf :• ii"\Y�♦: T\: .vh` `ii .L., : : -«tb� n �rW/f.': \i�>i} •r: :4`:'....•.i { +?k: li. tiH/ / r : v3vTn3 CYj Y�,5is:. :. :,tC:•� ?' a` n"�.Y ")e•� `j /0/rti {/,: .�} 4:.$ Tk•';,; a fr./vx:•.: :: / ''ti� 3z •% ! ' MC: % : / ? r, .er•f-yY '�t v�; ;;�$ : i , .X \ Y� 1 { K }? \Y rv/ �vn k?(t!: ; 4f • - �: . 3 :�1/amJ/� _d6 • • • k_s r3::Y i: ! : . ci:` ..r f 3J?:i '{rr r yk, Y i �?,�Y; i k{ fa i }%� a{4 % _ Jf :. ✓ , ,S,l'am7..< a' :.�i.. �� . ; L\ ,Tv.. .!,�+l ,iwt. . .tt� i \ r�7• :.�r G.� :ma -'�rfrd � `n'.• ,"Y,•H/t� .J a}• ' .Jx a::C.. .4..-:,}.h 4.... ?`. , . .:: C�Y fn �` .: a a ; fZ +C..-...� .:,:u7{...?Y •� ),`p,£ :Y: . r .• ` v Ti. } .`JY .\1.i i ' .^:.,iRlvein :},pQi.T:{ CS v\ :Yt ,. 1sy :hn.:. � ,. :':1%,,.L:'. 4}.;:,% 5.� � i. <;tititw: v. k"."^ <::.:,�Y ` :,` ? : ' fiY��w_. . - .i?K./f S: -?2KtE0; 3vM ii .�{3ix Yrv `:{ { .J, " £ f rvw$ £ ' `'? 4-4W,IR :5::n> 'Q t?S8iLFSY :::•!tir:.i, :....w<} an. x::..v 3r a�)` 2r /.r ,:Y tb ' :K \ h'f}:i aY. �5 v�ihl. l,A�:Y: : ; . .. } ::Ti.z;5 ;i\`-`.y•:;�;` xaHn.1� n -S.. --d:?, n::-x.c,a ... ..: 4: ( vyn?,r C. : iv. w - ` �w �% %h : �� �'h )Yxta••t8t} <•1,:.: i.v?^ ll:Iv x : t tr -aK l;}i! � f.: �:i . . x.::2 rc.J?c:anv , fL2;.,J, ..G x yiv' Y ; �; ri/�% :1:..'/� : ?r,%;riri :}1%. ,}n .♦S :.: c-. �, :k:f!k)t n h y 4d4.•3 i�..'#r/ i :}�h rf, %a:rA\ K\C'LC,h :t v yf1 4" .var ` Yha.t.m: .) t :i•„. Wh � ^ A. 2a r.% frru;,. . / : ;# ,BSuVaY.`,:. v 1 ''L,�,<�/ '::.e.f C4x hhK}4:...: . «y :�.i,,R .r, ::,,,w� .'v 1,:�' :r -..' y/• .c�,:.Y' , 1... .i } '.,r. i;fi : /n a �•: . •.ia{!La♦{ •r4 /lY : / - • 5. . �Y:a:: : Jt:. n� �} YY h�:.,. ..3 . t !4- , ) ;.` f} f r ,. rrr3 `Yr{>..`,.,i T �u:•: :,tr \Y:/:fr.2?�:k:...ftY:,..). _. .-.I..... :::: fit:. �: `:f ✓ v.:,: ci } k�.:>:i:ci• ,i•S „Y%.r xt... .f,\,.kc...,a., an �r3 'Ha x!0krtY: ;:%.rfi,. ...: x.\. T. ,, ,.„.. :r :; : ({%: ; . ii`.�.v:st `?:;., a - } ;M-Tv/,. Jv.�,T,i:.4n,?\" f,:rit? ;:\..\\?• .ay .,+.Y:`!: r/}/.•..•\ . .:.:,v•, a ,,' rrrn44r.a :. :.i:.•::.c4 .::.:::}.?: C ia,>` ; . aT. \::}??}2 ` .J{v. £ :.: �., v, : ,: T.•.v.E :.�,,. ..vW •,v.T / , •rr 2: Jv.. A•� � ik •A:..S. •):')i: fi:'♦SCl};.}:i:.:i,,,..,};04.,lf4:'k 'i {F '?Y �}fn ,. rn\ , •.:... ,. } Y? . Y ,:}n.+.l.TS\« ••a :k :.4'.!r,S.Y.. .•{na/ .).? :::Y:}::i::::.;:i:::: vE:,,v?:if::f:;:?::: ,b! %<�:J1 .xt �P k L :r 3 :i-ti'� f.. : , \ .♦,: • :;,♦., v.a.v.:v v:,:,:..\.L L,.L \ (4a. ,� :: �: , :: i :'k' `F k, .Af(y..,.,: t.¢{ `t.u::?:.;Z "- vh!L •2;K2K,;f}?.?.<i: :u.0: \,:,a:.,a .;•:: hkx.', .YoS .. ,.v ;; ',..• 7.cii�.a )x:S .l :; .} s .:a.:.:,:•vr., ,a.k .r'f,yr Yf!r4 04\vn . . '�a,«•,, T1 trCvWJ : 4 : d„ H %:.::N3:? ::; �li . .: a .::n, .alA a,v:.... ..�.:. A :, v./x v «\ \a. \ '''<:',v v««u ,. {K. u...,:v .ppv,r, -t:4nn.n..« .1?...---g- v:.... lL.v.:�:?.T: t Y Ja, . n.iv .::�\: : y� - r .5�:: {-;: :y , iana.' ' ,v,,va 2:,,v .v\nr:/ ,)\L ,vn va:<,\\.,:v.♦)Y.,':x i. v,:,, a.V'lr.:n. r.}), .n., ..{\v-. , ,t... n;•f n! .„.k'v}., a:.rfYYA -f%.,':;a}f ,g4\7 :LiX }P .,t T4O! ..$ 1�« .„ l :-.,a:,, . ..v', \,..0'.,.,.;.av,.:n.>,.,t:,...� J.x: ..X, ✓'".. gf. skC5�'�(( t::•-:Raerbh f. :^ r.: '5....ra f4r�r:x/ : w � � ; _yn{\.rr:: r�.,., r/3< .:,;�),}:.T }}r,f?..,�a.:f.;:?:;,.%xr1a.t.,.r.a :..} . .�,.,.:v}Cl w nv<,:v5(a:. v...u. . .a:r,J,:•x+,:;.::::•1,,.::iT .7.::: , /4•r!."}f%@1�:• � 2i a \ ffl1 , , .Ji.x.n.::✓ ,f`tti(,•. :�(y f ,.; n rv.,:. .\.T,.,}.\::.,/Z,:.vi,{,n v :r,.) ,r �<:Lr\,...C;;n}a•,.n\.,:, :...x. '.Yfk..% / ! �L} gt':;,: Cjc;:.t:''v ny.'N.. ,n iC •; �v-.,�-4':;::m� ,- ,'-?":`, J...: F ?::i ::,...\.af,\' -' .: K: rn>1...,,.,., '\}:,nn :.}.;,y':l''',., .nhv. y. %, Dark.t i,:::a!nvv:. s,n:v.-.;:',Tvv fk$ 'a<:v, ,..0 aA?' : t: :tig., ..,•,, .y � ::-.; { i' . ., ,. . , :r v,,::: , i`.,...:�v .:« L;:,:.ah v:C ° r:..'' ,h .�T£ \•v:vv.�vr a`nr v,;a .;.,-. :. -.,,,, {v,,r:��� � : 1N6 i3: - r ,+•:ii::L, }' : :, «:, .,.:a, uv: ::.A: , :n4n{ ,z;,: : , : :�2; a�'f ';Y` :}::.:;: . .Y i2,. ijr tr4 W^::t - . Sf�ly?iJ Y. N) : ,,}',:.v \,.. u: aaa. . . ,.... .). ., .. .. . `Y } x ck ,i'.:i :>^::a i + .FkK+c}i 7./;N xf:" ♦{42: : . : • c - it./ ) L/!! <.. , ,:: .. ,n\ .•. .a:. , \:}Y..:::T?{. ,T::�.:<•:. :,4\}:'2):f v♦{1 } 4b , .,ti!a2?`:::x J ;:-:f ;iji: *>, Yna�4.\,444ri rr!�v '}:�, : y�,i,:i:7,r ,., ., . , .,:. . ;•.•. .., :..,T f4•. ?.�v...v • a. , ..:, ?:, � : , ,:,}. `: A ::,;vas+i:..T•.,:::a,�,.?aYi;iv:<.f:.. •84.� vrT: 0.< :: ::„.,.. .• .,.,: . .. . vn.) ., . u : : . .. , k.• • .‘,...'.,',I.:: Tv«::v . x»::?4;,.•T:: Eri.,n ♦ �a{, u�:v\:/-4:::Y) •Yw:Ay: S.T .•:iv:.J'-:iii?w < vPi '/. }av .::T. :, :..:. . .:. . ; v.,). ?::c.,. .:.:;J ,CLv \:Y\ i•J,::C.a.}Tt}ra �£.C::,v...n`} Y, ! Y•YE::?:i'k;;..ii::j{ ; ; .?, .%:: ',�.... . .. : ,. ,, . .:, •• a; }.a ....?... \.)L\•.):f,,v:n;',-..vv.::,:.Yn:, :.T.. SCALE♦ . . {::?2•:t: - :•;y>:.}:aT,{,:?5C, % T :/�, ; i v .:; . �E;.... ....r v:.vv•?:?:\' O '�YPQ0E �?bEez , o..:'/:�...:T..-.:..' . . .... ?Yk.'�#?j� S 34.:::i??y :< a. :> ; .. • • • • • % • % • % ...,:.i.:,,," \ • • • • • • • NM • MEI MM. ... CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE FIGURE 1 TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR TRANSPORTATIONi? ENGINEERSANDPLANNERS CONCEPT PLAN Mr. Bob Lambert -5- February 17, 1997 exclusive right turn exit lanes. Aligning the west access point across from LaRivier Court will reduce the number of intersections along CSAH 1. The sight distance available at this location is adequate for this fourth leg. The recommended concept plan includes three parking lots which provide about 600 total parking spaces, sufficient to meet the peak expected demand for current park activities. The three parking lots and the circulation drives connecting the lots have been placed on the park perimeter. Locating the parking lots on the perimeter allows park users to park their vehicles in close proximity to park activities taking place throughout the park grounds. It also eliminates the interior circulation that currently exists in the park, thus reducing conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. Furthermore, this plan also reduces the current practice of parking along the circulation drives, reducing the potential for vehicular conflicts. Two-way traffic circulation allows motorists to choose a preferred entry and exit point, helping to relieve congestion at the peak times of arrival and departure. It also allows drivers to get from one point in the park to another without having to get back on CSAH 1. All parking lots and circulation drives should be paved and striped accordingly. Pedestrian paths are included in this plan. These paths are shown constructed over the existing internal circulation drives. These paths will direct park users from the parking lots to the activities in which they are participating. The paths are shown intersecting near the concession stand,,where pedestrian safety has been greatly enhanced by eliminating vehicular circulation. The final layout details of the parking lots and circulation drives are subject to further cost and feasibility studies. Earthmoving at the west end, fill on the east end, and acquisition of land in the southwest corner would be necessary to construct this concept plan. It is important to indicate that the recommended concept plan is intended to adequately accommodate the current level of activity at Flying Cloud Fields. The plan does not provide additional traffic or parking capacity to accommodate any significant increase in the number of persons using the fields at the same time. RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Currentlythe postedspeed limiton 1 is45 mph west of LaRivier Court and 50 p s CSAH p mph east of LaRivier Court. Consequently, eastbound vehicles are accelerating as they pass the park. This is not a desirable condition from a traffic safety point of view. We recommend that the City pursue changing the speed limit east of LaRivier Court to 45 mph for consistency and safety purposes. We recommend that the traffic volumes at the east park access intersection be monitored periodically, keeping in mind the possibility of future traffic signal control. In the meantime, police officer control should continue to be provided at this intersection during times when such control is needed. Unapproved Minutes Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Monday,March 3, 1997 Fox explained they removed the trash cans last fall and has directed staff to get the trash cans back there. B. Flying Cloud Fields Traffic Study Report Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated February 18, 1997, from Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources; and a memo dated February 17, 1997, from Benshoof and Associates, Inc. Lambert explained the City Council authorized staff to hire Benshoof and Associates to conduct a traffic study to determine what improvements should be considered to address the safety issues caused by traffic at the entry and exit points at Flying Cloud Fields, as well as the traffic conflicts between pedestrians and automobiles within the community. The traffic isn't going to get any less and the traffic on County Road 1 is going to increase now that they are probably going to have use of that land in the future. Benshoof and Associates have provided a concept plan but there is no cost estimate on this project yet. The Commission was asked to authorize staff to go to MAC to ask if they will allow the City to expand the boundaries to the south and a little to the west to add parking. This would provide parking for 600 cars with two exit lanes at each point so the 600 cars can exit in 13 minutes. Staff anticipates a traffic signal at Staring Lake Parkway in the future, but may or may not get enough warrant to do that. If MAC agrees, the staff needs authorization to spend money to survey the work to determine what the costs would be. Ken Bomben, Eden Prairie Soccer Association, commented he supports staffs recommendation for this site. He commented about the plan to reevaluate flow patterns during the spring season. He pointed out that if the east side is taken down, they will not be at full capacity when they do that plan. MOTION: Koenig moved, seconded by Brown, to recommend approval of the Flying Cloud Fields traffic study according to the staffs memo of February 18, 1997. Motion carried 6-0. C. Recommendation to Open Beaches on the First Day of Summer Vacation Staff referred the Commission to a memo dated February 15, 1997, from Julie Hoeft, Aquatic and Fitness Coordinator. 31 DATE: 03/18/97 ED .N PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NONE .3 SECTION: Director of Public Works DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: • Public Works Water Rate Surcharge for Lawn Irrigation/Conservation Eugene A. Dietz Requested Action: Consider establishment of a water surcharge rate to promote water conservation in Eden Prairie. Background: In 1994, Eden Prairie began the process of developing our water utility system for ultimate needs. As the first step in that process, the Water Supply Plan was prepared to address customer demand, emergency contingency plans and conservation. In a workshop session with the City Council, a consensus was formed that conservation would be addressed primarily through education and a public awareness program. As a direct result of that process, the design of the Water Treatment Plant features a public education space. The building is currently under construction and the design of the interior details is underway through a partnering process with the Eden Prairie School District, the Environmental and Waste Management Commission and City staff. During the workshop session and in subsequent conversations with the City Council, a great deal of discussion focused on the fact that water demand often quadruples between winter and summer due primarily to lawn irrigation. It was agreed that we would pursue a mechanism to put a surcharge on the portion of the water demand attributable to lawn irrigation. During the past year, the Environmental and Waste Management Commission and City staff have worked toward a plan to implement a surcharge based on the following criteria: • Equitable application to all residential customers • Commercial and industrial customers would need to be dealt with independently from residential customers • The method of calculating the surcharge must be understandable • The surcharge mechanism would not be viewed as a revenue generator, but rather a mechanism to focus attention on water conservation and environmental stewardship • Computation of the surcharge should be based on an individual customer's use rather than a broad flat rate approach. The summary of this analysis is attached as the following four pages. I will review this in detail with the City Council at the March 18, 1997 meeting, but in order to begin your review, the following information will be helpful: • Three potential rate structures as shown for two different years. • Two years were selected out of data available for 1990-1996 in order to evaluate the impact to customers for higher and I. •,ver demand years. I Water Rate Surcharge for Lawn Irrigation/Conservation March 18, 1997 Council Meeting Page 2 • The principal of the surcharge is based on individual customer usage of water during the winter quarter. Each scenario allows a certain percentage use over winter quarter at standard rates, thereafter, all additional use being surcharged at$.50 or$1.00 per 1,000 gallons. As an example, 50%/$1.00 means that a customer that uses 20,000 gallons of water during the winter quarter would be allowed to use 30,000 gallons of water during a summer quarter before the surcharge rate of $1.00 per 1,000 gallons would be triggered. Only the amount of usage beyond 30,000 gallons would be charged the extra $1.00 per 1,000. • Average winter use for the two years that were analyzed ranged between 17,000 and 17,500 gallons per customer. For purposes of computing the surcharge, the customers actual winter quarter use or the City-wide average is used to establish the base rate, whichever number is greater. This step is provided to recognize many people are gone during the winter or may consist of one or two people, but still have lawns and gardens similar to a family of six. • The summary shows the average cost and maximum cost for customers based on each of the scenario for the two years shown. Additionally, six ranges of total surcharge cost are shown with the percentage of our customers impacted in each range. The summary tends to show that for the two years that were analyzed, at least 90% of all customers would fall in the ranges of$50.00 or less. Commission Recommendation: Environmental and Waste Management Commission recommends implementation of the 50%/$1.00 strategy. The Commission believe that this surcharge mechanism provided the best compromise between the number of customers impacted and creating enough of a cost to make the surcharge noticeable. Finally, the Commission recommends that the plan be implemented for the 1997 lawn irrigation season. Since Logis, our billing provider, will need to do some programming in order to implement this process, a timely decision by the City Council will be necessary. Water Conservation Evaluation Summary Information 1992/93 1994/95 30%40.50 50%/$1.00 75%/$1.00 30%40.50 50%41.00 75%41.00 Average Winter Water Use * 17.37 17.47 Total Cost $54,340.18 $83,461.61 $60,611.45 $39,792.86 $60,485.19 $43,736.31 Average Cost per customer $9.06 $13.92 $10.11 $6.64 $10.09 $7.29 Maximum Cost per customer $85.59 $159.97 $145.96 $98.25 $181.50 $162.75 Total # of Customers ** 5996 5996 % of customers with$0 cost 29.9% 45.9% 55.5% 40.4% 52.4% 65.4% % of customers with costs between $0 to $25 54.5% 30.1% 26.8% 48.8% 30.0% 21.6% % of customers with costs between $25 to $50 13.1% 14.0% 10.6% 9.7% 11.0% 8.4% % of customers with costs between $50 to $75 2.4% 6.4% 4.8% 1.1% 4.5% 3.3% % of customers with costs between$75 to $100 0.1% 2.4% 1.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.9% w % of customers with costs greater than $100 0.0% 1.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4% * in 1,000's of gallons ** for comparative purposes,the same customer base for 1992 was used in 1994 Water Conservation Evaluation Summary Information 1222/22 1224/95 Avg.Water Use• Avg.Cost Maximum Coat N sal0 Cost %s✓S0 Cost Avg.Water Use Avg.Cost Maximum Cost I H40 Cost %„✓$0 Cost District 1 (2.888 customers) (May/Aug,/Nov./Feb.) 30%/S0.S0 Winter Q,arterAvera;4 1661 17.87 -Spring 20.51 $0.52 $28.20 S1,509.95 2289 79% 15.68 S0.06 S19.10 S184.29 2842 98% -Summer 31.04 S4.44 $38.20 $12,820.59 1160 40% 30.14 S3.60 S37.88 S10,400.35 1482 51% -Fall 23.77 $1.64 S35.65 S4,750.46 1875 65% 19.77 $0.62 $32.38 $1,781.93 2496 86% -Winter 16.64 $0.14 $32.70 S403.90 2750 95% 17.08 S0.09 S18.88 S271.20 2809 97% -TOTALS 22.99 $6.75 $64.91 $19,484.90 966 33% 20.67 $4.38 $65.27 $12,637.77 1411 49% -50%/S1.0o -Spring 20.51 $0.51 S53.09 $1,467.39 2639 91% 15.68 $0.08 S33.00 S233.56 2861 99% -Summer 31.04 $6.81 $73.09 S19,664.57 1521 53% 30.14 $5.41 S72.19 S15,618.33 1807 63% -Fall 23.77 $2.20 S67.50 $6,343.96 2243 78% 19.77 $0.79 S6I.19 $2,285.67 2650 92% -Winter 16.64 S0.16 S62.09 S459.92 2823 98% 17.08 S0.11 $34.19 S331.56 2854 99% -TOTALS 22.99 $9.67 $123.17 $27,935.84 1373 48% 20.67 $6.40 $123.38 $18,469.12 1744 60% 75%/S1.00 -Spring 20.51 S0.25 S48.93 S724.51 2788 97% 15.68 $0.05 $27.72 S 130.06 2877 100% -Summer 31.04 S4.88 S68.93 S14,092.27 1922 67% 30.14 S3.78 $67.72 S10,912.68 2145 74% -Fall 23.77 S1.38 $62.75 S3,996.10 2518 87% 19.77 S0.48 $56.72 $1,383.06 2752 95% -Winter 16.64 S0.09 S57.93 S267.84 2861 99% 17.08 $0.07 S29.72 S194.26 2867 99% -TOTALS 22.99 $6.61 $114.87 $19,080.72 1820 63% 20.67 $4.37 $114.45 $12,620.05 2097 73% *in 1,000's of gallons "for comparative purposes,the same customer base for 1992 was used in 1994 Water Conservation Evaluation Summary Information 1222/93 _ 1994/9a Avg.Water Use* Avg.Cost Maximum Cost /rdMO Cost %»✓S0 Cost Avg.Water Use Avg.Cost Maximum Cost /ui$0 Cost %m10 Cost District 2 (1.109 customers) (June/Sept./Dec./Marl JO%/$0.50 Winter Quarter Average 18.67 18.41 -Spring 34.22 S4.83 $34.86 $5,356.21 475 43% 24.78 S1.41 $28.53 51,558.35 782 71% -Summer 29.40 S3.46 $36.36 $3,837.47 686 62% 32.95 54.88 $37.53 $5,412.10 545 49% -Fall 23.04 $1.19 S33.65 51,316.74 881 79% 17.33 $0.23 $21.53 $253.76 1045 94% -Winter 18.00 $0.10 $14.85 S106.87 1073 97% 18.39 $0.14 $27.20 $151.25 1065 96% -TOTALS 26.17 $9.57 $85.59 $10,617.29 400 36% 23.36 $6.65 $52.60 $7,375.46 444 40% SO%/$L00 -Spring 34.22 $7.39 S65.99 $8,193.99 601 54% 24.78 51.77 $53.38 $1,967.87 907 82% -Summer 29.40 $5.45 $68.99 $6,045.78 790 71% 32.95 S7.82 $71.38 $8,671.02 658 59% -Fall 23.04 $1.62 $63.50 $1,801.75 957 86% 17.33 $0.29 539.38 S318.55 1079 97% -Winter 18.00 $0.10 $23.50 $108.93 1098 99% 18.39 $0.17 $50.00 $189.91 1093 99% -TOTALS 26.17 $14.56 $159.97 $16,150.45 543 49% 23.36 $10.05 $95.76 $11,147.35 585 53% R 75%/$1.00 `✓ ` -Spring 34.22 $5.18 S61.32 $5,749.03 711 64% 24.78 $0.99 S48.77 51,101.25 993 90% -Summer 29.40 $4.07 $64.32 $4,511.37 861 78% 32.95 S5.96 566.77 S6,605.25 766 69% -Fall 23.04 $0.99 558.75 S1,094.38 1099 99% 17.33 $0.17 S34.77 $191.99 1093 99% -Winter 18.00 $0.05 S15.75 $57.96 1102 99% 18.39 $0.13 $44.50 $138.92 1101 99% -TOTALS 26.17 $10.29 $145.96 $11,412.75 661 60% 23.36 $7.25 $86.55 $8,037.41 716 65% *in 1,000's of gallons **for comparative purposes,the same customer base for 1992 was used in 1994 Water Conservation Evaluation Summary Information 1222/93 12246d Avg.Water Use• Avg.Cost Maximum Cost N m'$0 Cost %»✓S0 Cost Avg.Water Use _ Avg.Cost Maximum Cost N na0 Cost %nr$0 Cost District 3 (1.999 customers) (July/Oct/Jan./Anril 30%/S0.50 WinterQuarterAverage 17.74 16.38 _ -Spring 40.27 S7.94 S37.47 S15,877.10 551 28% 33.18 _ S5.45 S37.86 S10,895.58 701 35% -Summer 30.13 S3.84 S37.47 S7,679.71 1132 57% 28.99 S3.91 S38.36 S7,806.72 1036 52% -Fall 17.54 S0.16 S22.97 S323.70 1920 96% 18.68 S0.36 S33.45 S716.07 1785 89% -Winter 19.54 S0.28 S33.97 S557.41 1807 90% 17.46 S0.18 S18.80 S361.26 1862 93% -TOTALS 26.87 $12.23 $74.37 $24,237.99 420 21% 24.58 $9.89 $98.25 $19,779.63 561 28% 50%/S1.00 -Spring 40.27 S13.06 S71.39 S26,115.00 702 35% 33.18 S8.63 S72.43 S17,256.29 943 47% -Summer 30.13 S6.11 S71.39 S12,219.36 1338 67% 28.99 S6.20 S73.43 $12,397.77 1260 63% -Fall 17.54 50.21 S42.39 S412.26 1957 98% 18.68 S0.43 S63.50 S857.55 1910 96% -Winter 19.54 S0.31 $64.39 S628.70 1929 96% 17.46 S0.18 S34.00 S357.11 1939 97% [� -TOTALS 26.87 $19.70 $136.16 $39,375.32 582 29% 24.58 $15.44 $181.50 $30,868.72 810 41% v 75%/S1.00 -Spring 40.27 S10.09 S66.95 S20,167.99 951 48% 33.18 S6.48 S68.34 S12,954.48 1212 61% -Summer 30.13 S4.66 S66.95 S9,314.89 1516 76% 28.99 S4.70 S69.34 S9,387.76 1449 72% -Fall 17.54 S0.13 S37.95 S253.55 1976 99% 18.68 S0.27 S59.25 S548.86 1956 98% -Winter 19.54 S0.19 S59.95 S381.55 1963 98% 17.46 S0.09 S29.50 SI87.75 1978 99% -TOTALS 26.87 $15.07 $122.85 $30,117.98 849 42% 24.58 $11.55 $162.75 $23,078.85 1105 55% "in 1,000's of gallons St for comparative purposes,the same customer base for 1992 was used in 1994 DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Director of Public Works DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Award Contract Public Works Baker Road Tank Painting - I.C. 96-5419 Eugene A. Dietz Requested Action: Adopt resolution awarding contract for painting the interior of the Baker Road Ground Storage Tank to DeLoughery Painting in the amount of$99,500.00. Background: Approximately four years ago, the exterior of the Baker Road tank was repainted. DeLoughery Painting has submitted the low bid to sandblast and repaint the interior of the tank, which is scheduled to occur this fall. Although there was some initial concern that the next two bids exceeded the DeLoughery proposal by more than 50%, the firm is comfortable with their bid and expects to proceed with the project. American Engineering and Testing, Inc. and City staff recommend award of the project to DeLoughery Painting. Financial: This project is proposed as a capital project and would be paid from the Trunk Fund/Capital account. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: I.C. 96-5419 - Baker Road Ground Storage Tank Painting bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works recommends award of Contract to DeLOUGHERY PAINTING as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with DeLoughery Painting in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $99,500.00 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on March 18, 1997. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL John D. Frane, City Clerk DATE: 03/18/97 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Director of Public Works DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5417 Public Works Award Contract Parks/Public Works Maintenance Building Eugene A. Dietz Requested Action: Adopt motion to award the contract for the Parks/Public Works Maintenance Facility to Sheehy Construction Company in the amount of $3,619,900.00 (accept all alternates except Number 2 and Number 8) and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the contract documents. This award and execution of contract documents shall be subject to confirmation of the MnDOT settlement for acquisition of the current maintenance facility. Background: We received nine (9) bids for this project, all of which were very competitive and under the architect's estimated cost for the work to be performed. The attachments indicate that Sheehy Construction Company has asked to withdraw their bid because of an error in the amount of $53,000.00. After consulting with the City Attorney, the attached response was prepared indicating that the conditions for withdrawal of the bid are not satisfied. Our joint recommendation is to therefore award the contract to Sheehy Construction Company. Financial Implications: Also attached is a side-by-side comparison of the budget that was presented to the City Council on April 18 compared to a revised budget that includes bid results. This analysis essentially shows that project revenues and costs are approximately balanced. Since this project is primarily a remodeling project, it is likely that some change orders will be necessary during the course of construction. Staff is recommending that any additional costs would be paid for through a contribution from the Trunk Utility Capital Fund. Finally, as noted in the recommendation, award of the contract would be subject to confirmation of the settlement as proposed by MnDOT. Although we have agreement with the District Office of MnDOT, the executed paperwork has not been received. 1996 - 2008CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM MEN ACQUISITION - - Riobucd7.Anderson Conservation Area 31.530.708 8350,000 $206,000 8345.000 $332,900 $l7\,l00 $402,50O $333�0O Cedar Forest Park land in lieu * Smetana Lake Park land bulieu * Riley Creek Linear Park 100,000 50,00 50,000 PARK DEVELOPMENT Community Center S2.965.000 $00/300 375,100 100,000 $2,400100 Round Lake Park 300,000 50.000 50'000 200.000 ' Staring Lake Park 750,800 25,000 275,000 450.000 Riley Lake Park 275.000 75.000 200.000 _ Miller Park 1.210.000 230.000 230.000 250.000 250.000 250.000 Purgatory Creek Recreation Area **1.820.000 20.000 **500.000 **1.000.000 **250.008 Birch Island Park 150,000 150,000 - Preserve Park 250.000 250,000 | Prairie View Park 200.000 200.000 - ' Timber Creek Conservation Area 30.000 30.800 _ Pheasant Woods Park 50.00 0�0 Edcobrook Conservation Area 155.000 55,000 100,000 EdcuvuJr Conservation Area 110,000 110.000 \ BicbucdT.Anderson Conservation Area 175'000 100,000 75,000 Bice Marsh Lake Park 110l00 10,000 50.000 50,000 Miller Spring 15.000 l5.0OO � . ' Cedar Forest Park 250,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 Crestwood Park 375,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 ToyvicwPurk 10,000 10.000 Forest Hills Park 200,000 200'000 ' Smetana Lake Park 100.000 100,000 Flying Cloud BuUfinldo 100.000 20.000 20,000 150.000 TRAIII, CONSTRUCTION - Rice Marsh Lake 100.000 15.000 S175,000 Lower Purgatory Creek 300,000 300,000 Hidden Ponds 25,000 25.000 ---------------------------------�----_---__-----------'---------------------_---------------------'--------------------------------'°------_--_.-__-__-____'~^_-________ �~~ GRAND TOTAL SlO.Ul5,700 S2,170.00 $681.800 31730,000 S1,932,900 S1.326,100 3942.500 B,263.200 B710.000 S380.000 S525,000 S475,000 [IP/8ob March 11, 1997 1996-2005 ESTIMATED REVENUE FOR PARK CAPITAL ]IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Fund Balance Beginning wfYear $1,177,360 $1,326,360 $986,360 $768,460 $387,360 $324.860 $131,660 $56,660 $241,660 $161'660 Cash Park Fees Fund 30 450,000 500,000 5OO.0OO 50O,U00 500.0OO 5O0.0O0 50O�00 450J�� 400,000 400.000 ^ SoftballNolleyball Fees'Improvements 30,000 30,000 35p00 35,000 35.000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Bond Referendum Fund 3A) 230,000 'O' '0' '0' 'O' 'O' -0' -0-. '0' 'V' (lgV24.5odDioofo«dovnbpnocnt) - Bond Referendum(Fund 105) '0' '0' 'O- -O' '0' 2,400.800 '0' -O' '0' '0' (2OO\ 2.4odUkxn for Community Center) Tax Increment Fiuuuuc 50,000 500,000 1,000.000 250.000 '0' '0' 'O' '0' '0' '0' Fnderal&c8tme Park&;Recreation Grants 20,080 200,000 'O' 'U' 200.000 '0' -0- '0- '0' '0' CD0G '0' '0' 'O' 'O' '0' 'O' -0' -0- '0' 'O' " GeucruiFnud/ADA* '0' 130,000 30.000 ]O,OOO 30,000 35.000 '0' -0' 'O' '0' Otbcr(doomiuns.mcj '0' -O' 'O' '0' '0' '0' '0' 'O' '0' -U' lotememAcunual'Fuod3l 50,000 50,000 50.000 30,000 15,000 'O- '0' -0- 10,000' 5.000 General Fund(capital outlay,etoj '0' '0' 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 'W' '0' 'O' $2,007,360 $2,716,360 $2,701,360 $1,713'460 $1,267,368 $3.394,860 $766,666 $541.,660 $686,000 D601.660 $681,000 $1,730,000 $1,932'000 $1,326,100 $942,500 $3,263,200 $710,000 $308,000 $525,000 $475.000 *Refund this fund from the general fund for maintenance and repair projects atthe Community Center(dehumidification uf rink#1 -$60,000 inl995.replacements ofdushedmmds Rink#l '$95,000 inl996) EmdRenvBo6 ' Muzubll, 1997 � ^ /