HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 07/07/1998AGENDA
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 7, 1998
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
7:30 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-
Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross
Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-
Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant
City Manager Chris Enger, Director of
Parks, Recreation & Natural
Resources Bob Lambert, Director of
Public Works Eugene Dietz, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council
Recorder Jan Nelson
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
II. OPEN PODIUM
III. MINUTES
A. CITY COUNCIl/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 16.
1998
B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1998
W. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS by Hoyt Properties. 2nd Reading of the
Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from 1-2
to Office on 3.76 acres and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review
on 3.76 acres. Location: 7765 Golden Triangle Drive (Ordinance for
PUD District Review and Zoning District Change and Resolution
for Site Plan Review)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
July 7, 1998
Page 2
C. FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING by Flying Cloud LLC. 2nd
Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from C-Hwy to
Office on 1.26 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of
Appeals and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 1.26 acres.
Location: 6608 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District
Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review)
D. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR FOREST HILLS 9TH
ADDITION
E. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR GRASSLAND
ADDITION
F. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS FOR PIONEER TRAIL
SANITARY SEWER AND WATER. I.C. 98-5458
G. RESOLUTION APPROVING EASEMENT ACQUISITION FOR
PIONEER TRAIL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER IMPROVE-
MENTS, I.C. 98-5458
H. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMIT ON
PORTIONS OF ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY AND STARING
LAKE PARKWAY, I.C. 96-5424
I. AUTHORIZING INFORMAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BRAUN INTERTEC FOR PAVEMENT
EVALUATION, I.C. 94-5351
J. APPROVE RELEASE OF LAND FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
AGREEMENT FOR OUTLOT G AND PART OF OUTLOTS I AND J,
AUTUMN WOODS 1 ST ADDITION
K. ACCEPT DONATION OF ICE RESURFACER FOR THE EDEN
PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER
L. APPROVE ADDITIONAL CONTRACT FOR TEMPORARY
DEHUMIDIFICATION OF COMMUNITY CENTER POOL DURING
POOL RENOVATION OF HVAC SYSTEM
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
July 7, 1998
Page 3
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. WYNSTONE by Jasper Development. Request for Comprehensive
Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential on 6.95 acres, Rezoning from R1-22 to R1-13.5 and RM-
6.5 on 9.01 acres, Preliminary Plat on 9.01 acres into 29 lots and Site
Plan Review on 6.95 acres. Location: 7102, 7126 & 7128 Baker Road.
(Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, Ordinance for
Rezoning, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
B. CAMP EDENWOOD by Friendship Ventures. Request for Planned
Unit Development Concept Review on 52.4 acres, Planned Unit
Development District Review with waivers on 2 acres, Zoning District
Amendment within the Public District on 2 acres and Site Plan Review
on 2 acres for construction of a new dining hall addition. Location:
6350 Indian Chief Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review and
Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District
Amendment)
C. VACATION 98-04: DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IN PART
OF BEARPATH SECOND ADDITION (Resolution)
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VIII. PETITIONS. REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. REQUEST BY FRIENDSHIP VENTURES TO REVISE LEASE
AGREEMENTFORCAMPEDENWOOD
IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
X. APPOINTMENTS
XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
1. Recommendations from Housing Maintenance Study Team
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
July 7,1998
Page 4
C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCES
D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1998
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
5:00 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans,
Ronald Case, Ross Thorfmnson, Jr., and Nancy
Tyra-Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City
Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, Director
of Human Resources, Community Information &
Services Natalie Swaggert, Chief of Police Jim
Clark, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 5: 15 p.m. She said there are four questions
that have guided the process: What have we learned? Where are we now? What are
the challenges? How do we adjust our visions? We need to adopt a Strategic
Management Plan. It is a process with multiple components that we have begun and
are now coming to the first stage of input. The Council has done a number of things to
articulate our version of the community values. We now need to measure the findings
we have against the grid of City responsibilities. The information generated in the next
step is a very major analytical step which will take us to the third step --the plan.
II. OVERVIEW OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS
A. VISION 2001/ A STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Enger played a ten minute video of Mayor Harris describing the Vision 2001
Strategic Management Process.
B. REPORT ON BOARD AND COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Thorfinnson said the video was not available for the first of the three meetings
and he felt it was a rather disappointing session. It was effective because we
learned some things and altered our presentation for the other two meetings. It
was a small group, but they were very receptive to what we talked about. They
were able to grasp the issues, asked questions and wanted to know where they
fit in the process. Boards and Commissions want to be kept up to date on the
process, and they enjoy being in the same room with other boards and
commissions in order to have a chance to talk among themselves.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
June 16, 1998
PageZ
Enger said they presented the 3D-minute Bill Morris tape at the first meeting. It
turned out to be too long so they abbreviated it for the second meeting. The
commission members seemed ready to dialogue We presented the commission
charters, and they appreciated that the commissions had been set up according to
some traditional structuring. It made sense to have commissions that
represented the needs and desires of the community. There was a need for gap
analysis that will overlay the commission charters and show the gaps between
the commissions and the expectations of the community. He said each of the
three meetings had a different Council host.
1. Participation Levels
2. Insi&:hts/Outcomes
Tyra-Lukens said Councilmember Thorfinnson already reviewed what
happened at the first meeting. They went over the allotted time even
though there were very few participants. People were interested and
excited about the direction, but they didn't get to go through any
examples. Enger noted we asked them to look at what focus areas their
commission might be involved with, to pick an issue within the focus
area, and to work through a strategic action plan for reaching the goal in
that area. He said that exercise worked better each time we met.
Case hosted the second meeting. He said the education piece was very
effective, and people on commissions have shown they don't mind
additional meetings if it isn't wasting their time. He thought we have the
potential to right some of the overlap on the boards and commissions.
Butcher-Younghans said the third meeting went very well, probably
because all of the bugs were out of it by then. Everyone knew
something, but they weren't on the same page in terms of the process.
They talked about examples of how it fits and discussed how we could
combine the commissions for some events. She could see some people
make the big leap and relate the abstract information to how it applied to
their work.
Enger said as the commission members began to understand the
information, they also saw potential conflicts. He said they were
challenged to use the Council/Management Values in their work to begin
a framework of things to include those values, and to take the tapes and
material back to the commissions and to give a presentation to the
groups.
Tyra-Lukens asked if the Arts Commission is doing a strategic plan.
Swaggert said Tria Mann is planning to incorporate that into their
planning. Thorfinnson said she came to the Council because she was
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 3
concerned about how their plan would fit in with all of this. We told her
it was okay to do it, but to keep in mind the basic concepts.
Swaggert said after we met in February we intended to gather input, but
as we went through the process, we found the commissions weren't
ready to give input back. We needed to educate them on the process in
order to make them aware that we expect them to start using the values
in their work. We also needed to make sure to lay the groundwork for
potential changes in the alignment of boards and commissions. We
wanted to encourage them in a more active involvement with the Council
on a regular basis and to bring forward the kinds of things they are
working on rather than having them wait for the Council to call on them
for a joint meeting. Swaggert said the commission members now expect
that we will complete an analysis of all the charter statements and will
look at setting up new boards or commissions or merging the current
ones. They also expect we will find a way to have them get together at
another point besides the annual banquet. We will need to determine
how we want to do that.
C. COMMUNITY FORUM -FINAL REPORT
1. Community Focus Areas and Values
2. Use and Application
Enger reviewed the consultant's final report, noting that transportation is
the over-riding issue. The focus areas could very easily be picked up
and looked at as a plan, but it is not a plan.
Swaggert said the biggest danger lies in someone seeing it who hasn't
been briefed and who assumes it is a strategic plan. They are working
with the liaisons about that, and will emphasize that this is a point of
reference for us as we go forward.
III. DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
A. IDENTIFICATION OF "STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS"
Thorfinnson said the next step is to move to the Staff to gather information that
will be used to help develop the Strategic Plan. We will compare the focus
areas and the service areas in the City to find those that don't fall neatly into the
focus areas.
Enger suggested we take some time to review the handout and make sure the
focus areas cover what our focus area needs will be in the future. The people
were present-bound in the meetings, as were Council and Staff in the beginning
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 4
of the process. The community focus areas should not completely drive the
process.
Thorfinnson said we need to keep in mind that not everything we do as City
government will fit neatly into one of the focus areas, and we need to add
everything else we do to the strategic focus areas. We need to look at the two
lists and see if there.is anything that is glaringly missing.
Harris thought many of the things in Public Works don't necessarily fit into the
focus areas, but we will continue to do them. She thought the focus areas were
areas to look at going into the future, and then we look at how the things in
Public Works support these areas. We also need to ask if there are services we
now provide that are no longer essential. She thought the community takes
services for granted.
In order to evaluate what should be maintained, Case thought we need to list out
what the essential functions are currently, along with this list of emerging needs.
We have another category of managing government. He wanted to see those
items in the list. Thorfinnson said we would like to run this together without
getting into that detail, and then see what we do day to day and where it fits.
Tyra-Lukens thought the Strategic Plan should not be just the focus areas.
Dietz thought the report synthesizes what a lay person would say. People talked
about maintaining what we have. There was a lot of stuff that was said that did
not make the cut for the report. While there is a lot of discussion on doing
more with less, we seem to have dropped the concept of doing more with less
increase. Swaggert noted Enger added that during the presentations.
Harris thought doing more with less has become a mantra throughout the
country, but it is important to remember the "do more with less increase"
concept.
Regarding the focus area comparison worksheet, Butcher-Y ounghans thought
the things on the left are categories, and some of the things on the right are
subsets of those categories.
Tyra-Lukens thought the next exercise has to be to go back to the experts and
come up with a third list of what our interpretation should be in order to
determine the strategic focus areas we will build the Strategic Plan around. We
will determine what will guide us for the next 3-20 years, but right now we are
only working with focus areas.
B. PROCESS AND TIME LINE
Swaggert said we are in the process of assessing where we are now. The
internal assessment is not done. We need to do a personnel audit as part of the
1-/
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 5
process. We expect to spend another four-five months in this process to develop
the information to work from. The next step is strategy development where we
will look at the strategic service areas.
Harris thought transportation could be held up as a model for how to begin to
think about it. Swaggert thought the internal assessment will determine who are
the players, and out of that should come how we want to align ourselves and
what resources are needed in which areas. This would include day-to-day
operations, as well as strategic issues. We will need to look at the commission's
charter and mission statements to determine what type of organizations outside
of Staff we need to support the City's business.
Enger said they talked at the Staff meeting last night about handbooks that
explain the process of strategic planning. One such handbook said
governmental agencies might have an over-all vision, but might not be able to
pare down to one mission statement because there are so many service areas in
government. We might want to write mini-mission statements in all of the
service areas. We need to finish up with the focus areas so we can go on to
develop the strategic service areas.
Thorfinnson said we need to determine the goals so we can measure the success.
What we hope to accomplish is that each of the strategic service plan could then
have a mini action plan. Swaggert noted we need to get to where we can write
quantifiable and attainable goals.
Enger said we need to get the focus areas completely identified. He thought the
HTSSB might be a good model for us because they have members from different
boards who work together on projects. We need to have a discussion that is
cross functional.
Harris said the focus has shifted internally to Staff, and the question is how do
you organize to facilitate that. Enger thought finalizing the focus areas will
suggest how we might organize groups internally to look at the issues.
Lambert expressed concern about not understanding what this is all about. He
was not sure he could see this process even getting to the answers. He could
understand that we will be a different kind of city in five years, and we need to
determine how our jobs and responsibilities will change because of the changes
in the City.
Harris said much of what the Parks Department does will continue. She could
see some cross-cutting relationship that needs Lambert's input, but it will be less
tenable to just plan for Parks and Recreation.
Dietz said there were things said in the past that indicated we are heading
towards certain things. He thought we need to streamline the process and
5'
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 6
combine some processes. He thought it might be time to start dealing with
specifics.
Thorfinnson noted we started this process two years ago in order to analyze
whether changes were needed in the boards and commissions. We don't know
what the outcome of all this will be, and we could go through the process and
decide we don't make any changes. There is no preconceived notion of what
will come out of this.
Harris said we will witness a marked shift in demographics and will need to deal
with an aging population and people's expectations for that.
Case was frustrated with the fact there is detail out there that we haven't looked
at, but he got the sense that this is the time when we are going to look at the
details. We now take the vision and goals together with what the City is doing.
He thought it doesn't always make sense now when we allocate funds, and this
will give a rationale for why we spend dollars here or there.
Harris noted this has been a long process up to now and she could see that there
would be a difference between the pragmatic and the conceptual viewpoints.
Enger thought Dietz and Lambert could go ahead and work with what will be
needed. Dietz thought they would need some kind of format for that.
Thorfinnson thought we could help by defining what our expectations are.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m.
UNAPPROVED MINUTES
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1998
CITY COUNCIL:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLLCALL
7:30 PM, CITY CENTER
Council Chamber
8080 Mitchell Road
Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans,
Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy
Tyra-Lukens
City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City
Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert,
Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City
Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan
Nelson
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmember Butcher-Younghans
was absent.
I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Jullie said item V.A. should be deleted because the official notice for the project was
determined to be invalid due to a publication error in the Eden Prairie News. It will be
rescheduled for the July 7, 1998 Council meeting.
Case asked if the neighborhood will be renotified. Jullie said they will be.
MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Agenda as
published and amended. Motion carried 4-0.
II. OPEN PODIUM
III. MINUTES
A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. JUNE 2. 1998
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to approve as published the
minutes of the City Council meeting held Tuesday, June 2, 1998. Motion
carried 4-0.
I
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 2
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-110 APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR I.C. 93-5304 EDEN PRAIRIE CROSSING FRONTAGE ROADS
C. RESOLUTION 98-111 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR RUED FIRST
ADDITION
D. RESOLUTION 98-112 APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE CSAH 39 <VALLEY VIEW ROAD) AND 1-
494 RAMP INTERSECTIONS. I.C. 97-5443
E. RESOLUTION 98-113 APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT TH 212
<FLYING CLOUD DRIVE) AND REGIONAL CENTER ROAD, I.C. 97-
5445
F. HTG OFFICE BUILDING by TGP Enterprises, L.L.C. 2nd Reading of
Ordinance 17-98 for Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on .86 acres
and Adopt Resolution 98-114 for Site Plan Review on .86 acres. Location:
9300 and 9310 Hennepin Town Road (Ordinance 17-98 for Zoning District
Change and Resolution for 98-114 Site Plan Review)
G. FULLER ROAD BUSINESS CENTER by Fuller Road Business Center
L.L.C. 2nd Reading of Ordinance 16-98-PUD-12-98 for PUD District Review
on 7.02 acres and Rezoning from I -General to 1-2 Industrial on 7.02 acres and
Adopt Resolution 98-115 for Site Plan Review on 7.02 acres. Location: 7905
Fuller Road. (Ordinance 16-98-PUD-12-98 for PUD District Review and
Rezoning and Resolution 98-115 for Site Plan Review)
H. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-116 DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO
EXERCISE THE LOCAL TRANSIT LEVY OPTION FOR TAXES
PAYABLE IN 1999
I. APPROVE AN ORDER TO HAVE THE UNSAFE CONDITION AT 7143
TICONDEROGA TRAIL REMEDIED
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case to approve items A-Ion the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4-0.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 3
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS
A. WYNSTONE by Jasper Development. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 6.95
acres, Rezoning from Rl-22 to Rl-13.5 and RM-6.5 on 9.01 acres, Preliminary
Plat on 9.01 acres into 29 lots and Site Plan Review on 6.95 acres. Location:
7102, 7126 & 7128 Baker Road. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change, Ordinance for Rezoning, and Resolution for Preliminary Plat)
Item deleted.
B. AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF UP TO
$4,000,000 REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, (CASTLE RIDGE CARE
CENTER, INC. PROJECT) SERIES 1998, AND APPROVING THE
FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
OF THE BONDS AND THE RELATED DOCUMENTS (Resolution 98-
117)
Jullie said the official notice for this Public Hearing was published in the Eden
Prairie News on May 28, 1998. The City previously issued $3,875,000 First
Mortgage Health Care Refunding Revenue Bonds (Castle Ridge Care Center,
Inc. Project), Series 1989. Castle Ridge has requested to refinance these
original bonds. In the past the City has been accommodating to these requests.
By its approval action the City does not assume any liability for repayment of
any portion of the debt incurred by this action. The City attorney's office and
the City Finance Director have reviewed this transaction and recommend
approval.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing;
and to adopt Final Resolution 98-117 relating to a Health Care's Facility
Revenue Refunding Bond for the Castle Ridge Care Center, Inc. Project, Series
1998. Motion carried 4-0.
VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens to approve the Payment of
Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a Roll Call Vote with Case, Thorrmnson,
Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye."
VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
VIII. PETITIONS, REOUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. REQUEST TO MODIFY PARK BOUNDARY AT PRAIRIE VIEW PARK
BY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 4
Jullie said we have received a request from three adjacent property owners to
modify the park boundary at Prairie View Park by having the City sell a portion
of that park property to them. The three parcels would vary from 1500 square
feet to nearly 4000 square feet. The property owners have been utilizing this
City park property as an extension of their backyard areas. A letter was sent by
Staff to inform the three property owners of a trespass issue and request that
amenities such as gardens, fences and garden sheds be removed from the park
property prior to April 1, 1998. He said the Parks, Recreation, and Natural
Resources Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of this request
at their May 18, 1998 meeting.
Tom Schmidt, 17726 South Shore Lane, representing the neighbors, reviewed
the letter sent to the City prior to the meeting. They did not realize the property
was part of the park property. They have maintained and used the section of
land as a park over the last 10-12 years. They do not think that section of land
is serving the City for any public purpose. He thought the correct action for the
City was to sell them the land, or, if that is not possible, to allow them to
maintain the use of it as it is now.
Harris asked Lambert if there are areas we maintain as natural versus
maintained parks land. Lambert said the City has over 2000 acres of park and
open space land and over half of that has been designated as natural areas. The
neighborhood has had some serious impact in Prairie View Park since the
development went in. The developer had to grade on City park land in order to
accommodate the drainage in the project, and the graded area appeared to be
part of the backyards. However, just because we don't mow a park doesn't
mean we consider it to be useless or not really a park. Areas left in a natural
condition will help to slow down some of the drainage, and shrubs, weeds and
eventually trees would grow there. He said Staff would discourage allowing
people to mow into park land because it eventually becomes like a yard, and we
would have many requests if that were allowed.
Case agreed the property involved appears to fit very nicely with the lots. In
many ways this is a unique case, but there is no way to word it that way.
Tyra-Lukens thought the next case would appear to be unique too. While it was
unfortunate the way this happened, we have to draw a line in the sand. We
spend money to buy park land, and our residents trust that we buy it to hold as
public land in perpetuity.
Harris realized that everyone has acted in good faith, and she expressed her
appreciation for the maintenance the neighbors have performed over the years.
She thought we would be establishing a precedent that would not be
maintainable over time if we agreed to their request. We need to let the
property return to its natural state.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 5
Thorfinnson asked when and if the lots change hands, what will prevent this
from happening again. Lambert said we will place carsonite markers along the
boundaries.
MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to deny the request to
modify the park boundary at Prairie View park, per the recommendation of the
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Staff Agenda
Report of June 16, 1998. Motion carried 4-0.
IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
X. APPOINTMENTS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL & WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION -
Appointment of a member to fill an unexpired term throu&:h March 31.
2001
Jullie said we need to appoint someone to fill an unexpired term on the
Environmental & Waste Management Commission.
Thorfinnson nominated Kristi Yager. Case seconded the nomination. There
were no further nominations.
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to close the nominations and
to cast a unanimous ballot for Kristi Yager to fill an unexpired term on the
Environmental & Waste Management Commission through March 31, 2001.
Motion carried 4-0.
XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL
RESOURCES
1. Proposed Petition to the Riley/Pur&:atory/Bluff Creek Watershed
District and the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District for the Creek
Corridors Basic Water Mana&:ement Project
Lambert said the City Council previously approved issuing a request for
proposals to contract for services to assist the City in developing a
management plan for the various conservation areas within the City. As
Staff drafted the RFP and developed criteria for conserving these areas,
much of it referred back to protecting the water resources within these
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 16, 1998
Page 6
corridors and complimenting the approved Watershed District plans.
City Staff discussed the possibility of a joint project between the City of
Eden Prairie, the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District and the Riley/
Purgatory /Bluff Creek Watershed District to develop the management
plan for these conservation areas as a basic water management project.
Lambert said after discussing the general goals and purpose of the
Conservation Area management plans, it became apparent to the Staff of
the Watershed District that the goals for these management plans are
consistent with the goals of the Watershed Districts in protecting the
natural resources along these cr,eek corridors. Accordingly, Staff is now
recommending City Council approval of a joint petition to the Watershed
Districts for the Creek Corridors Basic Water Management Project.
100% of the costs for developing this study project would be paid for
and funded by the Watershed District.
Lambert said it will be a two-phase project with the study as the first
phase. As a result of the study, trails may be proposed, but each project
would be voted on by the Council.
MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to submit a
joint petition to the Riley/ Purgatory/ Bluff Creek Watershed District and
the Nine-Mile Creek Watershed District for the Creek Corridors Basic
Water Management Project as per the Staff agenda report of June 16,
1998. Motion carried 4-0.
D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens, to adjourn the meeting.
Motion carried 4-0. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m.
--------------------------------
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar July 7, 1998
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Finance -Gretchen Laven Clerk's License Application List IV.A.
These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity.
CIGARETTE & TOBACCO PRODUCTS
Youssef Tadros Enterprises
dba: Garden Court Gifts
CONTRACTOR
All Systems Roofing Inc
Bloomington Htg & Ale Inc
Conrad Mech Contr Inc
Conveyor Craft Inc
General Sheet Metal Corporation
Greeninger & Associates Inc
Kolhenberger Co Inc
Marsh Heating & Ale Inc
Miller Architects & Bldrs Inc
Neu Plumbing
North American RoofSys Inc
Oakwood Builders Inc
Premier Mechanical Inc
Scherer Building Corporation
Silvernail Ent Ltd
The Maintenance Team Inc
United Operations Inc
Vogel Sheetmetal Inc
July 7, 1998 1
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-7-98
SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM NO. ISL f3
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS
Scott A. Kivv
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
• Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change from
1-2 to Office on 3.76 acres;
• Adopt the Resolution approving Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres;
• Approval of a Developer's Agreement.
Supporting Reports:
1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change
2. Resolution for Site Plan Review
3. Developer's Agreement
/
ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 18-98-PUD-13-98
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described
in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the 1-2 District and
be placed in the Office Zoning District 18-98-PUD-13-98 (hereinafter "PUD-13-98-0ffice").
Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions ofthat certain Developer's Agreement
dated as of July 7, 1998, entered into between Hoyt Propertie, Inc. and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter
"Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-13-98-0ffice,
and are hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings:
A. PUD-13-98-0ffice is not in conflict with the goals ofthe Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City.
B. PUD-13-98-0ffice designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its
own boundaries.
C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are
contained in PUD-13-98-0ffice are justified by the design of the development described therein.
D. PUD-13-98-0ffice is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing,
and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit.
Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the 1-2
Zoning District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-13-98-0ffice and the legal
descriptions ofland in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be
and are amended accordingly.
Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City
Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in
their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council ofthe City of Eden Prairie on the 2nd day of June,
1998, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting
of the City Council of said City on the 7th day of July, 1998.
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on _________________ '
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 18-98-PUD-13-98
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SumtnaO': This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 7765 Golden Triangle Drive from
1-2 to Office on 3.76 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property.
Effective Date:
ATTEST:
lsi Donald R. Uram
City Clerk
This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
IslJean L. Harris
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the ______ _
(A full copy ofthe text ofthis Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
Exhibit A
tf
ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS
Exlubit A
Legal Description:
Lot 2, Block 1, Technology Park 4th Addition
ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS
BY HOYT PROPERTIES, INC.
WHEREAS, Hoyt Properties, Inc. has applied for Site Plan approval of Ancor Communications on 3.76
acres for construction of a 3-story, 50,000 square foot office building located at 7765 Golden Triangle Drive, to
be zoned from 1-2 to the Office Zoning District by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on June 2, 1998;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its May 11, 1998,
Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its June 2, 1998,
meeting;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Ancor Communications for the construction of a
50,000 square foot building, based on plans dated May 26, 1998, between Hoyt Properties, Inc., and the City of
Eden Prairie.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 7,1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
ANCOR COMMUNICATIONS
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of July 7, 1998, by Hoyt Properties, Inc., a
Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,
a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City":
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development Concept
Amendment on 3.76 acres to the overall Technology Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District
Review and Zoning District Change from 1-2 to Office on 3.76 acres, and Site Plan Review on 3.76
acres for construction of a 50,000 square foot office building, legally described on Exhibit A (the
"Property");
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Resolution No. 98-106 for
Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment, Ordinance No. for Planned Unit
Development District Review and Zoning District Change from 1-2 to Office, Resolution No. __
for Site Plan Review, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows:
1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials
revised and dated May 26, 1998, reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 2, 1998,
and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set
forth in Exhibit C.
3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of
utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's written approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved utility plans concurrent with
building construction.
4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS:
A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading
and drainage plan contained in Exblbit B is conceptual Prior to the release of a land
alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City
Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The
final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water
detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land
alteration permit. All design calculations for stonn water quality and quantity together
with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan.
Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certify to the City that the water
quality pond confonns to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy
permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation ofthe approved
plan
Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan.
The design professional shall monitor construction for confonnance to the approved
final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall
provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in confonnance
the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy.
B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance ofa grading permit, Developer
shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an
erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all
boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration
procedures: All site grading operations shall confonn to the City's Erosion Control
Policy labeled Exlnbit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof Prior to release of
the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan.
Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed
sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and
post construction surveys for evaluation by City.
5 . PRETREATMENT PONDS: Prior to any grading permit issuance, Developer shall submit
to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's written approval of plans and design
infonnation for all stonn water quality facilities to be constructed on the Property.
Developer shall complete implementation of the approved stonn water quality facility plan
prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property.
Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the Property, Developer shall provide to
the City Engineer proof that the pond size has not diminished from the original design volume
because of sedimentation, erosion or other causes, and that the pond has been restored to its
original volume if the pond size has diminished.
6. WETLAND ALTERATION: Prior to any grading permit issuance, Developer shall submit
to the City Engineer for his review, a copy of permits obtained from the Watershed District
and U.S. Anny Corp of Engineers for the wetland alteration as depicted in Exhibit B.
7. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or
construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official, and obtain
the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified
on the grading plan in Exhibit B.
These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of
construction to be used for the retaining walls.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in
accordance with the tenns and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of
any occupancy permit for the Property.
8. GRADING IN THE WOODED AREAS ON SITE: Prior to grading within any of the
wooded areas on the Property, delineated on Exhibit B, Developer shall submit to the City
Forester and receive the City Forester's written approval of a plan depicting construction
grading limits on the Property. Prior to the issuance of any land alteration permit, Developer
shall place a construction fence on the approved construction grading limits. Developer shall
notify the City and watershed district 48 hours in advance of grading so that the construction
limit fence may be field inspected and approved by the City Engineer and City Forester.
Developer shall maintain the construction limit fence until written approval is granted by the
City to remove the fence.
9. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 1,777 diameter inches of significant
trees on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 494
diameter inches. Tree replacement required are 276 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of
any grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive
the City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 276 caliper inches.
This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a
shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also
provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide
tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to
building permit issuance.
10. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City
Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the
Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size
of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the
City Planner and receive the City Planner'S approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of
the cost of said improvements as required by City Code.
Prior to issuance of any occupancy pennit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete
implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the tenns and conditions
of Exhibit C.
11. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City
Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the
landscaped areas on the Property.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance
with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the
Property.
12. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to the City
Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical
equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes
gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air-
conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with
that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements.
Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any
occupancy permit for the Property.
If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined
by the City Planner, in his or her sole, reasonable discretion, that the constructed screening
does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and
differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall
take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the
deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the
security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures.
13. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to
the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior
materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property.
Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete
implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the
terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
14. PROOF OF PARKING SPACES: Developer and City acknowledge that the 105 proof of
parking deck spaces proposed for the Property, depicted in Exhibit B, are not required to be
constructed at this time.
At such time as the City Manager, in his or her sole, reasonable discretion, determines that
it is necessary for all or a portion of the proof of parking deck spaces to be constructed in
order to accommodate the tenant use, the City Manager shall notify the Developer in writing
of the need to construct additional proof of parking deck spaces. This notification shall
include the number, location and timetable for construction of the additional proof of parking
deck spaces. Developer shall comply with all requirements contained in the City Manager's
notification.
15. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a permit by Eden Prairie City
Code, Section 11.70, Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's
written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete
description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location, the manner of construction,
/ .')
and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material
construction, and location of any such sign, consistent with the sign plan shown on ExhIbit
B and in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Section 11.70, Subdivision Sa.
16. TRASH: Developer agrees that all trash, trash receptacles and recycling bins shall at all
times be located inside ofthe building depicted on Exlnbit B.
17. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City
Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the
Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures. Developer shall
complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy
permit for the Property.
18. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees
to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and
agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs
(including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors,
omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and
agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and
indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City.
19. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code
requirements within the Office District through the Planned Unit Development District
Review for the Property as depicted in Exhibit B and incorporates said waivers as part of
PUD ______ .......
A. Side yard setback of 14 feet.
B. Building setback of 135 feet from Nine Mile Creek.
C. Future structured parking deck setback of 97 feet from Nine Mile Creek.
D. Impervious surface of 49%.
E. Alteration (grading and landscaping) in the Shore Impact Zone.
II
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-7-98
SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM NO. JJL. t.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING
ScottKip~
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
• Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from C-Hwy to Office on 1.26
acres;
• Adopt the Resolution approving Site Plan Review on 1.26 acres~
• Approval of a Developer's Agreement.
Supporting Reports:
1. Ordinance for Zoning District Change
2. Resolution for Site Plan Review
3. Developer's Agreement
I
FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter, the "land") is legally described
in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. That action was du1y initiated proposing that the land be removed from the C-Hwy District
and be placed in the Office District.
SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the
C-Hwy District and shall be included hereafter in the Office District, and the legal descriptions of land in each
District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended
accordingly.
SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99, "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their
entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement
dated as of July 7, 1998, entered into between Flying Cloud, L.L.C. and the City of Eden Prairie, and which
Agreement are hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council ofthe City of Eden Prairie on the 5th day of May,
1998, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of
the City Council of said City on the 7th day of July, 1998.
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on ______________ '
FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND
FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Swnmaty: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 6608 Flying Cloud Drive from C-
Hwy to Office on 1.26 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property.
Effectiye Date:
ATTEST:
lsi John D. Frane
City Clerk
This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication.
Is/Jean L. Harris
Mayor
PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the _______ '
(A full copy of the text ofthis Ordinance is available from City Clerk.)
Exhibit A
3
Flying Cloud Office Building
Exhibit A
PARCEL 1:
THAT PART OF THE EASTERLY 16 RODS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 1. TOWNSHIP 116. RANGE 22. HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA.
LYING NORTH OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE
MINNESOTA STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 169. .
PARCEL 2:
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 1. TOWNSHIP 116. RANGE 22. LYING NORTH OF THE
N0RTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF MINNESOTA STATE HIGHWAY NO. 169,
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA.
AREA = 54.975 SQUARE FEET = 1.2621 ACRES
FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING
BY FLYING CLOUD, LLC
WHEREAS, Flying Cloud, LLC has applied for Site Plan approval of Flying Cloud Office Building
development on 1.26 acres for construction of a single-story, 11,000 square foot office building located at 6608
Flying Cloud Drive, to be zoned within the Office Zoning District on 1.26 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the
City Council on May 5, 1998; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 13, 1998,
Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its May 5, 1998,
meeting;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDEN PRAIRIE, that site plan approval be granted to Flying Cloud, LLC for the construction of a 11,000
square foot building, based on plans dated April 28, 1998, between Flying Cloud LLC, and the City of Eden
Prairie.
ADOPTED by the City Council on July 7,1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
•
DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT.
FLYING CLOUD OmCE BUILDING
TIllS AGREEMENT is entered into as of July 7, 1998, by Flying Cloud, LLC., a Minnesota
Limited Liability Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN
PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City":
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from C-Hwy to Office
on 1.26 acres, Site Plan Review on 1.26 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 1.26 acres into one lot for
construction of an 11,000 square foot office building, legally descnbed on Exlnbit A (the "Property");
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. for
Zoning District Change from C-Hwy to Office, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and
Resolution No. 98-85 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the
Property as follows:
1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in confonnance with the materials
revised and dated Apri128, 1998, reviewed and approved by the City Council on May 5, 1998
and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided
herein.
2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set
forth in Exlnbit C.
3. UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of
utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City
Engineer's written approval of plans for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved utility plans concurrent with
building construction and prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property.
4. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS:
A FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading
and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land
alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City
Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The
final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water
detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land
aheration permit. All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together
with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan.
Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall certifY to the City that the water
quality pond confonns to the final grading plan. Prior to issuance of any occupancy
permit for the Property, Developer shall complete implementation ofthe approved
plan
Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan.
The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved
final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall
provide a final report to the City certifying completion ofthe grading in conformance
the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy.
B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer
shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an
erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all
boundary erosion control features, temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration
procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City'S Erosion Control
Policy labeled Exlubit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of
the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan.
Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and/or proposed
sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and
post construction surveys for evaluation by City.
5. PRETREATMENT PONDS: Prior to any building permit issuance for the Property,
Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and receive the City Engineer's written approval
of plans and design information for all storm water quality facilities to be constructed on the
Property.
Developer shall complete implementation ofthe approved storm water quality facility plan
prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property.
Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the Property, Developer shall provide to
the City Engineer proof that the pond size has not diminished from the original design volume
because of sedimentation, erosion or other causes, and that the pond has been restored to its
original volume if the pond size has diminished.
6. REMOV ALI SEALING OF EXISTING WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS: Prior to
issuance by City of any permit for grading or building on the Property, Developer agrees to
submit to the Chief Building Official and to obtain the Chief Building Official's written
approval of plans for demolition and removal of existing septic systems and wells on the
Property, and restoration of the Property.
Prior to such demolition or removal, Developer shall provide to the City a deposit in the
amount of$I,OOO to guarantee that Developer completes implementation of the approved
1
plan. The city agrees to return to Developer the $1,000 deposit at such time as the Chief
Building Official has verified in writing that the Developer has completed implementation of
the approved plan.
7. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or
construction on the Property, Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Officia~ and obtain
the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified
on the grading plan in Exhibit B.
These plans shall include details with respect to the height, type of materials, and method of
construction to be used for the retaining walls.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in
accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of
any occupancy permit for the Property.
8. TREE LOSS -TREE REPLACEMENT: There are 185 caliper inches of significant trees
on the Property. Tree loss related to development on the Property is calculated at 161 caliper
inches. Tree replacement required are 186 caliper inches. Prior to the issuance of any
grading permit for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Forester and receive the
City Forester's written approval of a tree replacement plan for 186 caliper inches.
This approved plan shall include replacement trees of a 3-inch diameter minimum size for a
shade tree and a 7-foot minimum height for conifer trees. The approved plan shall also
provide that, should actual tree loss exceed that calculated herein, Developer shall provide
tree replacement on a caliper inch per caliper inch basis for such excess loss.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved tree replacement plan prior to
building permit issuance.
9. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall submit to the
City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the
Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity, type, and size
of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on ExhIbit B. Developer shall furnish to the
City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150% of
the cost of said improvements as required by City Code.
Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete
implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions
ofExlnbit C.
10. IRRIGATION PL'AN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City
Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property.
Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance
with the tenns and conditions of Exhlbit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the
Property.
11. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner,
and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment
on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas
meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air-
conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with
that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements.
Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any
occupancy permit for the Property.
If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined
by the City Planner, in his or her sole discretion, that the constructed screening does not meet
the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing,
adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take
corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the
deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the
security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures.
12. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to
the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior
materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property.
Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete
implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the
terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto.
13. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City
Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the
Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 30 feet
in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to
issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property.
14. TRASH ENCLOSURE: Developer has submitted to the City Planner, and obtained the City
Planner's written approval of a plan for the design and construction of the outside trash
enclosure for the Property. This trash enclosure shall be constructed with face brick to match
the building, and heavy duty steel gates that completely screen the interior of the enclosure.
Developer shall complete implementation of the trash enclosure plan prior to issuance of any
occupancy permit for the Property.
15. FINAL ORDER NO. 98-07: Developer has obtained approval from the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments for variances from City Code requirements within the Office District for a
25 foot front yard setback to building and parking on the Property as depicted in Exlnbit B,
attached hereto. This approval has been granted through Final Order No. 98-07, attached
hereto as Exhibit E.
Developer agrees to comply with all requirements of said Final Order No. 98-07.
Prior to any building pennit issuance for the Property, Developer agrees to provide proof to
the City Planner that Final Order No. 98-07 of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals was
filed against the Property at the Hennepin County Recorder'slRegistrar of Titles' Office.
16. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees
to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and
agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs
(including attorneys' fees), damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors,
omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and
agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and
indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City.
It
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: ) IlL, .
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Forest Hills 9th Addition
Randy Slick
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the fmal plat of Forest
Hills 9th Addition subject to the following conditions:
• Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $252.00
• Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of $160.50
• Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements
• The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement
Background:
This proposal consists of replatting Outlots B and C of Forest Hills 8th Addition. The plat
contains 2.13 acres to be divided into six single family lots and right-of-way dedication for street
purposes.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council July 18, 1995 .. Second Reading of the
Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on August
15, 1995.
RS:ssa
cc: Duane Dietrich, Taurus Properties
Randy Hedlund, Hedlund Engineering
\
. ',.
---:f-S-"-'~::;:42""~"-2"":-""-::-;"
.JEHHtFE!k ~ .. --:;1-
C{::UFT _;f-"''''''''''''''2''''2.:'W~I':''-=::''':O
~: fH
HEDI.UND
PLANNING m(;!NCERING SllRIf:)1NG
FOREST HILLS 9TH ADDITION
C.R, DOC. NO,
t6. 5l.78 7 ,-,
1'°'0 I 1 ~I 7 1 2• ~I I " 1 ~:;I I 1
2
tJ'1 I~
I 1$' 1 s
I I 1 ~
3
4
'"
tlfolMq!' OI'Id Utltlty Eo'tt'mtrlh ore
ShG ..... thUs:
Being 5 feel II' wklth ond Gdpl"inq
lo( 11n~t. unless other .. ., •• hown.
orod to t~.t fn width and adjoining
str •• , line, as shown Oft the plot.
1
1
1
1
I,.
2'
I>
~
2'
'00
.. :.:
t:: n::
:::
: ~:
~ :!:
~ ".
~
~ '" ...
n:
:.i~ ... .. :.:
100
'0 0
• Denotes Iron tnOl"lUmef'1.
~.-.-
Scale
'0
In
L
i GLEHH
mm·'E
I-
I
I
I
I
I
eo 120
!
Feet
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: ThaI TaufUs P,aperties, Inc. a Minnesota corporation, lee owner of the following described
property Situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit.
Outlots Band C, FOREST HillS 8TH ADDITION, according to the reeOl'd pial thereat
Has caused the same to be surveyed aTld plaited as FOREST HILLS 9TH AODITION and does hereby donale and dedicate 10 Ihe public for
public use forever the Courl, and easements for drainage and ulility purposes as shown on thiS plat
In wilness whereof said hums Properties, rnc., a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by ils proper officer this
__ day of .19_"
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
TAURUS PROPERTIES, INC .
Duane H Dietrich, President
~~~pf~/t~2:1~~ci_~~r~~n~~9~aS ::r~~~::!~~e:n bb~~~~f~~ ~:,I: -ro-,p-ora~idn.Of ____ ~ 19_ by. Duane H Dietrich. Preside"1 of Taurus
Notary PubliC, Ilennep'" CO\lnty, M'nnesota
My CommiSSion Expires JanUAry 31,2000
I hereby certify that I have surveyed and ptatted the property descflbed on this plat as FOREST HillS 9TH ADDITION. that thIs plat Is 8
correct representation of said survey, that all distances are cotleclly shown In feet and hundredths of a fool; thaI aU monuments have been
correctly plaeed in the ground as shown on said plat, that the outSide boundary lines are correclly deSignated on said plat; and Illal there are
no wet lands as defined 'n MS 505 02, Subdivision 1 10 be designated on said plat
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Jeffrey D. lindgren, land Surveyor
Mmnesota license Number 14376
~~~v~o::~oing sUlveyor's eertificate was acknowledged before me this __ day of _____ ,. 19_ by Jeffrey D. lindgren, land
EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOT"
Notary Public, Hennepin County, Mmnesota
My Commission Expires January 3t. 2000.
This ptal of FOREST HillS 9TH ADDITION was approved and a<:cepted by the City Council of Eden Pralfie, Minnesota at a regular mE'eting
thereof held on this __ day of , 19_ If applicable, the wrillen comments and recommendallons of the
Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the city or the pre~cribed 30 day pertod ha9
elapsed without receipt 01 such comments and reeommendations. as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505 03, Subdl\lisioll 2
CITY COUNCil OF EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA
By' ___________ Mayor By ___________ Manager
TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION. HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
I hereby certify Ihat taxes payable In 19 ___ and prior years have been paid In full for all land described on Ihis pial
Dated this __ day of 19 __
Patrick H. O'Connor. Hennepin County Auditor
SURVEY SECTION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
By ___________ Deputy
PUrsuanl to MINN. STAT. Sec. 3838.565 (19S9), this plat has been approved Ihls __ day of _____ 19_.
Gary F. Caswell, Hennepin County Surveyor
COUNTY RECORDER. HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
By_' ___________ _
~;ereb~tC~~:I~~~ the :ilhin plat of FOREST HillS 9TH ADDITION was filed for reCOfd in Ihts office this __ day of _____ ,
R. Dan Carlson, County Recorder By ___________ Oepllly
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
FOREST HILLS 9TH ADDmON
WHEREAS, the plat of Forest Hills 9th Addition has been submitted in a manner required for
platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota
Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Forest Hills 9th Addition is approved upon compliance
with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated June 25,
1998.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATIEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, Clerk
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: ::It: . E.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Grassland Addition
Randy Slick
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the fmal plat of Grassland
Addition subject to the following conditions:
• Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of $260.00
• Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for trunk utility improvements
• The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement
• Developer agrees to pay two connection fees for sanitary sewer and water at current rates
($11,670.00 each) prior to issuance of building permit
• Revision of drainage and utility easement along southwest corner of plat to the standard
five-foot width
Background:
This plat, located along Hennepin Town Road and south of Anderson Lakes Parkway, consists
of platting .86 acres into one lot for construction of a 4,260 square foot office building.
The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council May 19, 1998. Second Reading of the
Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on June
16, 1998.
RS:ssa
cc: Jim Grover, HTG Architects
John Chaffee, Clark Engineering
I
~,
\.:.
--,. -
l:,
CO>
"
"
.::."
()
':: . ..1
'c
('I
0'.1.
I~:
\)
<,-,
. .;;.
GRASSLAND ADDITION ----l' ....... ,ca., '/4 Cam., 01
Sfo(;. 24 1. III. R. 22
I'£HDW«ItHTI'/tICN.IIDR .
~~I
PI
/' __ -U,. /XTaItM 10 Sa.ilh LNJ.t (01 S£ 1/4) 01 5 ..... 24
__ ._. __ ~----~jl/-----N--•• -.-.3-'.-~-.--------I-M-·~----~--r_--_1~--r------l
'.---.:!----------------" '-/.T1 ! ""n!
~
~ -.
':;' :>
b1
~
!
!
~
t
~
\
\ . .. . ... ". .... , / / , .
'1\ /~/ 119 .",oo--___ ,r
\-_,;-_---Or~ and IItility «1$tImdIIt ------I Ii:
:§/ ! \~; ~I
8 ,i \ IO~ 'I ~ I:' ~\f:: "'g \,1
l 0 \' , ~ I w >-\1 !
, ~ -i-,-+--I~~ --)_) • ,f----~ 0 " .. Io:e. "',1. ::, ~ , , ,,'" ~ I ,. Iii ¥ I:! ~ ,\ G f' I ~ m§ ! ~ !
<; , , \-0 , : I~'" II' -. .. " e '~ ill ': ~ ',I-\I~~ §\ ! ~-; --1;-,; __ .Or __ ""ltY.o"·'''''~_'' .. l Ii! l:t:z!' ,
. -\'~ \/ // .... "' .. , ~ ~ -' \ L--~-"~ ~ <'L' //? . ,,.. J W ~ 1 ~.~\.I /' -Poinl 41$ f", North.'
i" --.'-i-------------. ~-l-:::-_,_! SEW_"s... 24
I ••• ·.3· •• " W ...... l I-'.
1\ I ~ I.
Lin, POI'Q/eI 10 South Lin. [01 S£ 1/4} of Soc. 24 It I II I &I
JO 0 ......... JO 60
I
OHIENIATION Of THIS BEARING SySTEM IS BASED ON n£
EAST It-.l£ Of SE 1/. Of SEC. 24, T. 110. R.22 WHICH
IS ASSUMEO TO HAVE A. ElEARt,a Of N 01·07' 55" W.
f! tf~ l ~ jJ ~SlxIth~1 CorlW' 01
/' S«. 24. r. 118, R. 22
/oOMIWODIMTr~ ------
o D£NOTES ~(».I ~NT
~~?!t !~~ ~!:8~r:. ry H!~~:!. ~a:!!:T!i cZ:::& ~l:!:[.!::!~ ':i'I':1 Q~:j'~ !., ~~( ••• :r ~~:~,::!:.~:;p:a!! ::. r~:' .• g:,,~{;" 01
BaAAlpla, Shot. 01 "Iaouoh. ,. wit:
~.!!:;~JI o~o~:,:, 1:,~::.:~~~b~::!T :,:,O!. 8;:: t::.~'· c!G..!!rDfH:rt.~ ,I Ol lira 4J:·i!.:' .. !~r, I!~ r~! a;!:::.::[ '!!;:., of
Slotioft •• : tbuu _ .. , leui pUI.h. 10 U,. 80111.111 II ••• , .. 4 "U Oil •• 11'6.0 •• of U' h.~: lbuu 'or'" •••
p .... III' ,. lb. I .. t lint 01 .. 14 .. oUo .. , • dl.hac. of 100 'ut: IbU.,. 'a.t 1.4' .... 1 ... t. Ib, 1011". Uat ., .... :::!!U.: ~!' :::03D1(.:3:,!:::; a!~:~::':'''!~r:!:·'b!:!:,'::l !: r:. t. 4 ::1,:::.;:" 1 g:lI!t;~ ~r.!::.r:~JI!.:!p:·'!::~···
To,aUtou wltb:
A.!!::tll ·~o!:::. l~l!::.::~~b:::! r t(:, O!. I;: f: ::.~" c!m.!! t.;!N:rt~ 1,0 ,.:a i, :'7!.t' N!~:h I!' r,! A:!~:~.~:r':!:: ... ot
a.ot~OA a.; tb.A~. w .... h4 p.rel1.1 to tb. 'oulb lID. 0' u 4 .eot OD • 41,'.lI.oe 0' .~. , .. ,: ".AU jfortb •••
p .... llel 10 tb.. I •• t lin. of .ald .. OllOD .• dlltaau 0' tOO I .. t; tla.au Ia.t •• 4 ,a ... lhl to til. 'Olltlt. 110.0' •• 1. :::!::~.: :!' t::o~of: .:3: t! :;!; Q!~:~:':'!:II !~r:!:afb::!:f I::l ! It:.:. cl t :tA:::.:f. I g~u!:; ~ AT .!!:.f:: a!.:!,:.,!::~a,.
H •• la.lI .. d tb ... m. to b •• un·.,.d a",4 .... U.d al QRAS3LA1i1) APDJTIOH .",d 40 .. b .... b' 40Gat. to Lb. pllbli. lor ,lIbah
II'. ' ....... r tb •••• .ment •••• bo.,. Il.r.oa 'or dr,'a". aad IILtllt, pllr,o •• ' 0111,.
III .ltn, ... ",r.ol •• 14 H,oll..,. Tbor.h •• oA Qrot'.r, Lt4" ba. 0 •••• 4 'b ••• pr •••• t. '0 II_ ." •• d b,. , .. pro,.r oltlo.r. tbl. ____ 4., 0' _______ , 1' __ . a, ___________ , tl. ______ _ a, __________ . II. ______ _
9UTE 0' MINNESOTA COUNTY 0' ____ _
T~. rota,OID, JD.\r~:!4";; aokD .. lld,d b.fore ~ ~bla --d., O!tlITGi';, 1'boU"D!!...-c;.!tr, Ltd., • IUDU .. L.
Corpor.tloD.
Hoter, Publlo. ___ Couol,. "r;;;;;r. W, cocml.,loD •• plr •• _________ _
In .UD .... 1Io.r.ol •• 14 Flra' H.t'oll.1 B.a.k 0' Cb ... II:. h •• oall •• d 'b ••• pr'''oh lo b •• 11".4 b, Il. p,op" 01110". tb,. ___ d., of ______ , 10 __ .
.,-----. _____ , 'l. ___ _ a, ___________ . u. _______ _
STATE 0' WINNISOU COUNfY 0' ____ _
,II. 'oulo'a, la.tr~D!,,4.~,.OIl:Do.l.d"4 1I.'or. me ~1I1' --"., 01 --,-, firiTli.d:;;r-.!rk of Cllaak.,
STATI 0' W,HNUOU.
COUNTY or KENNEP I N
. _____ .... ,01'
0.1"'. C •••• II, H.nn.pln COIiAt., Sur"'lor
, COilA', "lIdHor
DOC\InIDt NIanb.,. ________ _
s,
Nohr, 'lIbllo. ___ Coullt,. Mhl ... al • W, oCIIP:Qi .. ioQ •• ,Ir •• ______ _
NohI''' Publici. B.aa.pIA Couat,. Mlaa 11, ooaml •• JolOD '''plr •• ________ _
Cbalf
a, ________________ .
__________ , D.,lIt,
I hUb, urUl, til.' tb. ''',blll pht 0' ORASSLAND ADDITION .11 IIltd lor rocord 10 tilia 0,,10. 11101. ___ •• , 01 ________________ ,18 ___ , .t _ 0'010011: __ ....
a,
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
GRASSLAND ADDmON
WHEREAS, the plat of Grassland Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting
land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL:
A. Plat approval request for Grassland Addition is approved upon compliance with
the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated June 25,
1998.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat.
C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate
of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing
provisions.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, Clerk
3
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: j][, r
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 98-5458
Engineering Division Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids for
Alan D. Gray Pioneer Trail Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements
Recommended Action:
Approve Plans and Specifications and order advertisement for bids for Pioneer Trail Sanitary
Sewer and Water Improvements, I.C. 98-5458.
Overview:
This project will provide access to sanitary sewer and water utilities to 12 properties lying
westerly of Riley Creek and adjacent to Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1). A feasibility study for this
project was presented to Council April 7, 1998. A public hearing was held May 5, 1998 after
which the Council directed preparation of plans and specifications. This project will provide
utility service to the Settler's Ridge subdivision by Pemtom.
Fmancial Issues:
The project cost is proposed to be 100% assessed to benefiting property owners in accordance
with the feasibility study.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the City Engineer through R.C.M. has prepared plans and specifications for the
following improvements to wit:
I.C. 98-5458 -Pioneer Trail Sanitary Sewer and Water
and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDEN PRAIRIE:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file for public inspection in
the City Engineer's office, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in
the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for 3 weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids shall be received until 10:00 a.m., Thursday, July 30, 1998, at City Hall
after which time they will be publicly opened by the Deputy City Clerk and
Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 7:30
P.M., Tuesday, August 4, 1998, at the Eden Prairie City Hall, Eden Prairie. No
bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by
a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City
for 5 % (percent) of the amount of such bid.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, Clerk
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: rtf {y
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 98-5458
Engineering Division Authorize Easement Acquisition for Pioneer Trail Sanitary Sewer and Water
Alan D. Gray Improvements
Recommended Action:
Adopt resolution authorizing staff to proceed with acquisition of permanent and temporary
easements required for the construction of Pioneer Trail sanitary sewer and water improvements,
I.C. 98-5458.
Overview:
The feasibility study for this project was presented to Council April 7, 1998. A public hearing
was held May 5, 1998 at which the Council ordered preparation of plans and specifications.
Easements over several land parcels are required to construct the proposed improvements.
Easement acquisition should proceed immediately to support the tight construction schedule
necessary to deliver utilities to the Settler's Ridge subdivision.
Financial Issues:
Easement cost will be added to other project costs and assessed to benefitted properties in
accordance with the feasibility study.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISmON
OF EASEMENTS FOR
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 98-5458
WHEREAS, the Eden Prairie City Council previously approved the preparation of plans and
specifications for the utility improvements for I.C. 98-5458, Sanitary Sewer and Watermain
Improvements adjacent to Pioneer Trail in Section 30;
WHEREAS, easements are required to construct the utility improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that the City
Engineer and City Attorney are hereby authorized to acquire the necessary easements, by
negotiation or condemnation, on the following properties:
Parcel 30-116-22-23-000 1
Parcel 30-116-22-21-0007
Parcel 30-116-22-21-0010
Parcel 19-116-22-34-0008
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: .nt. #.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 96-5424
Engineering Division Authorize a School Zone Speed Limit on Portions of Anderson Lakes
Rodney W. Rue Parkway and Staring Lake Parkway
Recommended Action:
Approve resolution authorizing a school zone speed limit on portions of Anderson Lakes Parkway and
Staring Lake Parkway.
Overview:
As a result of concerns by residents and the School District, we have reviewed pedestrian safety issues
near Oak Pointe Intermediate School and are implementing some improvements. Some of these
improvements include a new crosswalk on Anderson Lakes Parkway at Garden Lane, "School Advance"
warning signs, and school zone speed limits (which are being addressed with this item).
Primary Issues:
In 1975, the Legislature changed the statutes to enable local authorities to establish speed limits in
school zones. The law prescribes that an engineering and traffic study must be done and a speed limit
established based on its findings. In addition, the law indicates that "the school speed limit shall not
be lower than 20 miles per hour and shall not be more than 15 miles per hour below the established
speed limit on an affected street or highway if the established speed limit is 40 miles per hour or
greater" .
The current traffic volume on Anderson Lakes Parkway adjacent to the school is approximately 11,000
vehicles per day with an 85th-percentile speed of approximately 43 mph. At the time when children
are going to and from school, the average hourly (two-way) traffic volumes on Anderson Lakes
Parkway (near Garden Lane) range from 650 to 975 vehicles per hour. Based on the age of the children
attending this school and the traffic volumes and vehicular speeds, a speed limit reduction from the
current 35 mph speed limit for this school zone is appropriate. It is recommended that a 30 mph school
zone speed limit (when children are present) be approved on Anderson Lakes Parkway between
Purgatory Creek and Staring Lake Parkway.
The current traffic volume on Staring Lake Parkway adjacent to the school is approximately 2,600
vehicles per day with an 85th-percentile speed of approximately 39 mph. At the time when children
are going to and from school, the average hourly (two-way) traffic volumes on Staring Lake Parkway
range from 175 to 250 vehicles per hour. Based on the age of the children attending this school and
the traffic volumes and vehicular speeds, a speed limit reduction from the current 30 mph speed limit
for this school zone is appropriate. It is recommended that a 25 mph school zone speed limit (when
children are present) be approved on Staring Lake Parkway between Purgatory Creek and Anderson
Lakes Parkway.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING A SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMIT
ON PORTIONS OF
ANDERSON LAKES PARKWAY AND STARING LAKE PARKWAY
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie Engineering Division has prepared a memorandum
summarizing the traffic conditions near Oak Pointe Intermediate School as per Minnesota State
Statute 169.14, Subd. 5a;
WHEREAS, the memorandum recommends a school zone speed limit (when children are
present) of 30 mph on Anderson Lakes Parkway from approximately Purgatory Creek to Staring
Lake Parkway; and
WHEREAS, the memorandum recommends a school zone speed limit (when children are
present) of 25 mph on Staring Lake Parkway from approximately Purgatory Creek to Anderson
Lakes Parkway.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council that a 30 mph
school zone speed limit (when children are present) on Anderson Lakes Parkway from
approximately Purgatory Creek to Staring Lake Parkway be authorized and that a 25 mph school
zone speed limit (when children are present) on Staring Lake Parkway from approximately
Purgatory Creek to Anderson Lakes Parkway be authorized and that the City staff be directed
to install the appropriate signing.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
SECTION: Consent Calendar
ITEM NO: .TIt-.J.-.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 94-5351
Engineering Division Authorize Informal Professional Services Agreement with Braun Intertec for
Rodney W. Rue Pavement Evaluation
Recommended Action:
Adopt motion authorizing an informal professional services agreement with Braun Intertec for
pavement evaluation in the amount of $40,000 and authorize the Director of Public Works to
sign the letter proposal.
Overview:
Over the past three years, Braun Intertec has been developing a pavement management system
that provides us a valuable tool for maintaining our street network. As part of the initial
proposal and system setup, condition surveys (surface deterioration) and deflection testing
(structural strength) were performed on all City streets within Eden Prairie, which provided us
an evaluation of our overall pavement condition.
Primary Issues:
It is important to have our pavement condition information updated on a regular basis. Our
initial survey information is currently three years old and these services will provide updated
information on all our City streets. This will help to develop a history of our pavement
condition and allow a more accurate prediction of pavement life span.
Fmancial Issues:
The proposal indicates a cost per mile for the condition survey and optional unit costs for
deflection testing. Our intention is to have all 200+ miles of City streets evaluated for surface
condition and choose a couple miles of streets for the deflection testing. $40,000 from our State
Aid allocation has been reserved to cover the cost of this evaluation service.
Staff recommends authorization of this agreement with Braun Intertec in the amount of $40,000.
I
BRAUNSM
INTERTEC
June 23, 1998
Mr. Rod Rue
City Engineer
City of Eden Prairie
6080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
Dear Mr. Rue:
Braun Intertec Corporation
6875 Washington Avenue South
P.O. Box 39108
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439-0108
612-941-5600 Fax: 942-4844
Engineers and Scientists Serving
the Built and Natural Environments»
Re: Proposal for Pavement Evaluation Services for Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Braun Intertec is pleased to offer pavement evaluation services to the City of Eden Prairie. The
requested services are to perform a detailed Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey on at least
200 centerline-miles of selected roadways in the City of Eden Prairie (Task 1.0). This
resurvey of the network will help the City to maintain the integrity of the pavement
management system data and improve the accuracy of budget analysis projections. We are
also offering to provide project-level, nondestructive pavement deflection testing services on a
per-mile basis (Task 2.0).
Attached to this letter is a scope of services and related cost proposal. Please indicate your
estimated amount of work to be completed for both Task 1.0 and Task 2.0. The total cost of
the proposed services will depend on the mileage totals you specify. We recommend using the
section-length information of the pavement management system to determine an initial
mileage/cost estimate. Based on the final set of delivered data, we can adjust the final cost of
the project to suit the needs of the City.
If after reviewing this document, you have any questions or concerns regarding the project
setup or services detailed in this letter, please call me at 942-3051. Thank you for your
continued interest in our services. We look forward to working with you on this project.
Anthony J. Kadlec
Senior Engineer
Attachment:
Proposed Scope of Services
General Conditions
g:lwpfiles\proposaJledenprlpcindl. wp I
Client Copy
Proposed Scope of Services -City of Eden Prairie
June 23, 1998
Page - 2
Braun Intertec proposes to provide the City of Eden Prairie with the following
pavement evaluation services:
Task 1.0 Pavement Condition Survey and Data Entry
The Pavement Condition Index (PCl) data collection will cover at least 200 centerline-miles of
the Eden Prairie pavement network. A sampling surface condition survey methodology will
be used. We propose to evaluate samples at the following rates.
Length (feet) Minimum Sampling Maximum Number of
Rate (percent) 100' Long Samples
o to 500 40 2
501 to 1000 30 3
1001 to 2000 20 4
Greater than 2001 20 4 plus
At a minimum, the following pavement distress types will be collected as part of the PCI
Pavement Condition Survey:
Bituminous Pavement Distress Types
I> Alligator Cracking I> Polished Aggregate
I> Block Cracking I> Potholes
I> Cold Joint I> Ravelling
I> Corrugation I> Reflective Cracking
I> Depression I> Rutting
I> Edge Cracking I> Shoving
I> Flushing I> Skin Patching
I> Heaving I> Slippage Cracking
I> Longitudinal Cracking I> Temporary Patching
I> Pennanent Patching I> Transverse Cracking
Braun Intertec will enter all the data of the pavement condition survey, calculate the PCI and
then deliver the updated databases to the City for installation. The City will be able to run
budget scenario runs immediately after the installation of the updated databases.
Client Copy
Proposed Scope of Services -City of Eden Prairie (Cont'd)
Task 2.0 Project-Level Pavement Deflection Testing
June 23, 1998
Page - 3
Project-level, nondestructive pavement deflection testing (NDT) may proceed during the same
time frame as the surface condition survey. From the data collected, we can calculate the in-
place subgrade strength in terms of the Effective Subgrade R-value, the effective pavement
strength, in terms of the Effective Granular Equivalent (EGE) thickness, and the in-place
spring load carrying capacity in tons per axle. This information can be used to recommend
overlay thickness for either 7-ton, 9-ton or lO-ton designs. All of this information will be
loaded into the pavement management system for the City to use to determine maintenance
and rehabilitation recommendations.
The following testing options are available to the City of Eden Prairie:
Option 1: < 20 Centerline Miles; One-way Testing; 50 foot intervals
Option 2: < 20 Centerline Miles; Two-way Testing; 50 foot intervals
Option 3: > 20 Centerline Miles; One-way Testing; 50 foot intervals
Option 4: > 20 Centerline Miles; Two-way Testing; 50 foot intervals
* Please note, Braun Intertec does not recommend making project-level pavement
maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations using a testing interval of greater than 50
centerline feet.
Client Copy
Proposed Cost Estimate -City of Eden Prairie
PCl Data Services
Basis of Payment:
June 23, 1998
Page -4
Task 1.0 PCI Data Collection. PCI data will be collected and entered into ICON at a
rate of $160 per centerline mile. Based on the City's initial estimate, at least 200
centerline miles will be rated. The total cost to perfonn Task 1.0 will depend on the
total mileage to be rated, as requested by the City. Braun Intertec reserves the right to
resubmit this cost estimate in the event that less than 200 centerline miles are requested
to be surveyed.
Option Unit Cost Miles Total City
($/Centerline Miles) Requested Cost Signature
More $160
than 200
Miles
Task 2.0 Project-Level, Nondestructive Pavement Deflection Testing. The City will
select specific pavement management sections for pavement deflection testing based on
the results of the pavement condition survey of Task 1.0 and other factors to be
determined by the City. Braun Intertec will provide pavement deflection testing services
for the City of Eden Prairie under one of the four following options.
Option Unit Cost Miles Total City
($/Centerline Miles) Requested Cost Signature
Option 1 $ 1,876
Option 2 $ 2,055
Option 3 $ 1,723
Option 4 $ 1,902
After reviewing this document, please sign both copies. Keep one copy and return the other
to Braun Intertec. Receipt of this letter will serve as our authorization to proceed.
Invoices shall be submitted on a monthly basis with payment due within 30 days of invoice
date as noted on the attached General Conditions.
Authorized by: Accepted by:
Braun Intertec City of Eden Prairie
By:
Darwin Dahlgren
Director of Management Systems Date:
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Consent Calendar
ITEM NO:~, J.
SECTION:
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Engineering Division Release of Land from Special Assessment Agreement for Outlot G and Part
Jim Richardson of Outlots I and J, Autumn Woods 1st Addition
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Release of Land from Special Assessment
Agreement for Outlots G and part ofOutlots I and J, Autumn Woods 1st Addition, and authorize
the Mayor and City Manager to sign the release.
Background:
In March of 1986, the City entered into a special assessment agreement with Trumpy
Development for their share of the construction and costs associated with Improvement Contract
No. 52-126. The I.C. 52-126 project is Dell Road from Twilight Trail to Highway 5. The
agreement was recorded at Hennepin County and appears on the title of each of the outlots.
Staff has been requested that the City release this agreement. The assessments have been levied,
therefore, it is appropriate and timely to release this agreement.
I
RELEASE OF LAND
This Release of Land is executed by the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal
corporation ("City"), and is dated as of July 7, 1998.
FACTS
1. A certain Agreement Regarding Special Assessments ("Agreement") dated March
3, 1986, was executed by and between the City and Trumpy Development, Inc., which
Agreement was fIled as D~ument No. 5101250 with the Hennepin County Recorder on April
22, 1986.
2. The special assessments contemplated by the Agreement have been levied and the
time for appeal has expired.
3. To evidence the fact that the special assessments have been levied and the time
for appeal has expired, the City is executing this Release of Land.
THEREFORE, the City of Eden Prairie, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereby
releases the Property from all obligations and conditions set forth in the Agreement Regarding
Special Assessments dated March 3, 1986 filed with the Registrar of Titles as Document No.
5101250 on April 22, 1986. This Release of Land shall not release or discharge the Property
from the lien of any special assessments levied by the City pursuant to the Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Eden Prairie has executed the foregoing
instrument.
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
A Municipal Corporation
BY: -------------------------------Jean L. Harris
Its Mayor
BY: --------------~-----Carl J. Jullie
Its City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
HENNEPIN COUNTY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ___ _
1998, by Jean L. Harris and Carl J. Jullie, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Eden
Prairie, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of said
corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
#7--Release. C
RFRl01-14-88
.3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: July 7, 1998
Section: Consent Calendar
Department: PRNR Subject: Recommendation to Accept Donation of
Joel Klute, Ice Arena &
Concessions Coordinator
Ice Resurfacer .TIL. ~.
RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommend accepting the proposed donation of a new ice resurfacer for the Eden Prairie
Community Center from Mark's Amoco and Metro Mitsubishi.
BACKGROUND:
Staff recommends this request due to the following facts about the current ice resurfacer:
• The current ice resurfacer is 16 years old.
• The current life span of an ice resurfacer is 10-15 years.
• The cost of parts and labor average $3,000-$4,000 per year. These costs continue to rise
yearly.
• The current trade in value on this machine is $12,500.
The cost ofa new ice resurfacer is $52,900. Mark's Amoco and Metro Mitsubishi would each donate
$20,000 in exchange for advertisement on the side of the machine. The City of Eden Prairie will have
specifications for the size ofthe advertisement. The balance of $400.00 would be payed by the City
of Eden Prairie.
REQUEST:
City staff requests the approval of this recommendation.
cc: Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services
Lyndell Frey, Community Center Manager
Mark Namtvedt, Owner Mark's Amoco
Ted Terp, Owner Metro Mitsubishi
1
•
06/30/98 14:39 FAX 6129415722 NORSEMAN OIL 141 02
Norseman 011 Co .• Inc. DBA/MARK'S EDEN PRAIAIE AMOCO
Joel Klute, Ice Arena Coordinator
Eden Prairie Community Center
16700 Valley View Road
Eden Prairie,:MN 55346
a,oo FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344
(612) 944-1690
June 30, 1998
I have received approval and commitment from Amoco Oil in general terms
to participate in the purchase of a new ice resurfacer for the Eden Prairie
Community Ice Center. Mark's Amoco will also participate in this purchase
up to 50% of the cost of the machine in exchange for advertising space on
the machine over it's useful life, ofa minimum of 10 years, but not to
exceed 20 years. In the event of a sale of Amoco or Mark's Amoco location
we reserve the right to re-identify to the prospective buyers. We participate
as a part of our commitment to give back to the community and customers.
Thank you for the opportunity.
Sincerely •
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: July 7, 1998
Section: Consent Calendar
Department: PRNR Subject: Request for approval of additional contract for
N.L. Lyndell Frey, Community temporary dehumidification of Community Center pool
Center Manager during pool renovation ofHV AC system
REQUEST:
Staff request the City Council approve an additional contract for temporary dehumidification of the
Community Center Pool during the renovation ofthe HV AC system. Temporary Cool has provided
a cost estimate of $9,070 for the six week time period provided for this work in the contract. This
is the lowest quote provided to meet this need.
BACKGROUND:
In order for the Community Center Pool to remain open during the completion of the rescheduled HV AC
project, a temporary dehwnidification system is needed. The original construction date was April 16 -June
1st. During that time the pool was closed. However, due to a strike by one of the manufacturers of the
HV AC system, the project needed to be completed at a later date. The pool filter system project was
completed as scheduled (see memo dated 4/14 for more information.)
SBS Mechanical's price quote is for a temporary system that only displaces the air. It has no system to
cool the air. Staff's concern with this proposal is that the air could potentially be displaced into the ice
arenas. (Wet humid air is drawn to the cold dry air.)
SBS Mechanical's price Quote is $10,928.
Temp-Cool's price quote includes not only displacing air, but cooling it as well. This, hopefully, would
keep the pool air from entering the ice arenas.
Temp-Cool's price QJlote is for $ 9,070.
It is unfortunate that the City is required to pay for this temporary dehumidification system, however
without this system in place -further roof and structure problems might be incurred. Also, within the
original contract SBS cannot be held responsible for a strike by the manufacturer.
The original budgeted amount for this project was $275,000 given no unforseen complications this project
will come in substantially below that amount.
Costs to date $203,900.00 Bid award to SBS
9,070.00 Temporary dehumidification system
Erickson 1 Ellison (consulting engineers)
Staff also considered the option ofre-closing the Community Center Pool during this six week period.
1
However, the pool was shut down for six weeks in April and May, and staff is concerned about the
potential loss of Community Center members, and disruption to the youth lesson program. Staff will
contract with Temp-Cool for $9070.00 to keep the pool and facility operational during this six week period.
Enclosures (3)
CC: Bob Lambert, Director Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources
Laurie Helling, Manager of Recreation Services
leffElwell, Building Maintenance Coordinator
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Eden Prairie Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
THROUGH: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
FROM: Lyndell Frey, Community Center Manager
DATE: April 14, 1998
SUBJECT: HV AC and Pool Filtration Systems Update
The following information is a brief description and update on the two renovation projects occurring
at the Eden Prairie Community Center. The Community Center pool will be closed from April 17
through May 30 for these two projects:
1. HV AC System (Heatin~ Ventilation and Air Conditioning System)
The bid was awarded to SBS Mechanical for $203,900. The consulting engineers on the
project are Erickson Ellison and Associates. The direct contact with the company for this
project is John Williamson. The preliminary cost estimate on this project by our contractor
was in the $275,000 to $325,000 dollar range. The $203,900 does not include the
engineering fee or a deduct alternate bid for a possible second contractor bid on the air
handling unit at an additional cost of between $9,000-$12,000. The reason for the need of
a possible second contractor for the air handling unit is the original company supplying the
unit is and has been on strike since mid February. If this company (Trane Company) is not
settled by May 1 st, another company will have to build the unit with installation then taking
place in early August. For this fInal phase of the project, it is projected that the Community
Center pool will re-open. During this time in August, we do not have a competitive team
using the pool. Our engineer suggests using large fans and open doors to accommodate our
lessons, lap swim and open swim programs. During this 2 to 3 week period in August, it is
proposed that the pool will not be required to shut down. Working with Erickson Ellison and
SBS Mechanical, it was decided that May 1st will be the decision date determining whether
or not a second contractor will be needed ifTrane Company remains on strike.
2. Pool Filtration System ( scheduled for April 17-May 30th)
The bid was awarded to United States Mechanical for $54,750. The consulting engineers on
this project are Water Technology, Inc. The direct contact with the company for this project
is Steve Brown. The preliminary cost estimate on this project by our contracted engineers
was $65,000. The $54,750 does not include Water Technology's engineering fee.
There are five basic components that allow pool water to be treated efficiently to make it safe
and pleasing for swimmers and to comply with local and state health codes.
• Filtration
• Circulation Pump
• Chemical Disinfecting
• pH Control
• Controls and Monitor Systems
3
With the completion of the above two projects, the Community Center HV AC and Pool
Filtration System will be well equipped to serve the needs of the residents of Eden Prairie
for the next 10-20 years.
Also included in this report are the expanded swimming hours made available at Oak Point
and the Williston Center during the Community Center pool closure of April 17-May 30,
1998.
memos/projects
April 14, 1998
•
------_ .... .-............. £.£ .. &. ..&. V..a.M IV' V.LV"'I
/
/
U:'_l1r--nr:..~~ DI..-l\i'';'1-1LLr:.
TE.P .. COOLTM
elVlSION OF AUFap INCUSTR INC.
Facsimile Cover Sheet
To: LYNDELL FREY
Company: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
Telephone: 949-8472
Fax: 949-8492
From: STEVE ANDERSON
Company: TEMP-HEAT
Phone: 612/707 -5050
Fax: 612/707-5104
Date: 6-29-98
Pages including this
cover page: 1
Estimate Ref. #3794-98
Dear Lyndell,
The following are the equipment costs for the dehumidification of the
pool area from July 6, 1998, through August 17, 1998:
• One (1) 20-ton air conditioner with heat coils at the one-time-charge
of $4,420.00 plus tax
• One (1) Temporary electric hook-up at the one-time-charge of
$3,650.00 plus tax
• One (1) installation of ductwork through two man doors to be done at
time plus materials.~~t.", t-.~ \.-:> ~~" \~ ~ ~ "\ -Note 1: Equipment will be operational by July 6th.
Note 2: For each day the equipment is returned before August 17,
Temp-Cool will credit $130.00 plus tax.
Note 3: For each day the equipment is used beyond August 17th,
Temp-Cool will bill an additional $165.00 per day plus tax.
If you have any questions, please call. Meanwhile, I will be in touch.
Thank you.
One Rupp Plaza, 3700 West Preserve Boulevard. Burnsville. MinnEsatB 55337·7746
toll free 868·460·COOL fax 61 2-707-5104 61 2-707 -5050
19JOOl
,
I
. ~ S B S MECHANICAL, INC. ___ ~------
7160 Madison Avenue
CHANGE ORDER Minneapolis. Minnesota 55427
" (612) 544-3471
NUMBER~ ________ __
CHANGE ORDER REOUESTED BY _______ ----~ DATE: & -~~Jt&
OWNERS AND/OR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CHANGE ORDE"R REOUEST NUMBER : ___ --r.--=..;(! .. ~....::I:....:=..JIa-V..::........!lCwT~.a~1-
EQUIPMENT ••......•.
MATERIAL • • • • • • • • • •
SALES TAX. • • • • • • • • •
MATERIAL SUB TOTAL. • • . .
FIELD LABOR MAN HFiS. @ $ ___ pr/hr: ____ _
SHOP LABOR MAN HRS. @ $ pI"'/hr: ____ _
DRAFTING MAN HRS. @ $ pr/hr: _--.........-=-_
PROJ. MGR k "MAN HRS.@$ fS pr/hr: __ l,:..al ..... O..-_
tRUCKING MAN HRS @ $ pr/hr: ____ _
LABOR INSURANCE & TAXES @ . . . .
TESTING & CLEAN-UP .........•
TOOL REPLACEMENT @ . . . .
PARKING -TRAVEL TIME-Subsistence
TEMPERATURE INEFFIC~NCY •••
OVERTIME INEFFICIENCY. .
LABOR SUB-TOTAL. . . • . .
EQUIPMENT RENTAL. • . • • • .
SUBCONTRACTS -CRANE SERV!CE • •
INSULATION .•
S\Je.
SUBCONTRACTS SUB-TOTAL.
PERMITS AND FEES. . . . . . • . . . . •
INDIRLCT COSTS FOR TBIS CHANGE ORDER. • ':"
-~---
CHANGE ORDER SUB-TOTAL COSTS:
OVERHEAD ~.
SUB-TOTAL • • • • • .
MARGIN to ~.
SUB-TOTAL • • • • • • .
CREDI'IS • • • • • " •.
"",
SPECIAL INSURANCE .
BOND PREMIUM. • • . . • • • .4 I
IOTAL PRICE OF CHANGE . . •
COST IF THIS C.O. IS NOT
ACCEPTED.
This proposal may be withdraYn by us, if not
accepted within days.
TIME EXTENSION REQUIRED __ --days.
NO. OF PRINTS REQUIRED
DATE: _,_-_~_~~..q_tl--
•
APPROVED BY;
DATE: ______________ --
Wdll:80 86. E2 Nnr
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS
ITEM NO. YJ4-.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger WYNSTONE
Michael D. Franzen
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing;
2. Approve 1 st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-13.5 and RM-
6.5 on 9.01 acres;
3. Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential on 6.95 acres;
4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of9.01 acres into 29 lots; and
5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff
recommendations (and Council conditions).
Background:
This project is 24 twinhomes and 5 single family homes.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission voted 4 - 2 to recommend approval ofthe project at the June 8, 1998 meeting.
Park & Recreation Commission Recommendation:
The project was approved on a 4-1 vote.
Supporting Reports:
1. Resolutions
2. Staff Report dated April 10, 1998 and May 8, 1998
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 11, 1998 and April 13, 1998
4. Correspondence
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF WYNSTONE FOR JASPER DEVELOPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
WYNSTONE
That the preliminary plat ofWynstone for Jasper Development dated May 26, 1998, consisting of
9.01 acres into 29 lots, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall, is found to be in conformance with
the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is
herein approved.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 7th day of July, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
,
WYNSTONE
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive
Municipal Plan ("Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and
comment; and
WHEREAS, the proposal ofWynstone by Jasper Development for 24 twinhomes and 5
single family homes requires the amendment of the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council ofthe City of Eden
Prairie, Minnesota, hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council
approval as follows: 6.95 acres from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
located at 7102, 7126 & 7128 Baker Road.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 7th day of July, 1998.
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
May 8, 1998
Wynstone 1998
Jasper Homes of Waconia
Wilbur Gjersvik, Steven T. and Karen I. Lipe, William B. Bunn, Donald
Flom
East of Baker Road and north of st. Andrew Drive
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential
to Medium Density Residential on 6.59 acres.
2. PUD Concept Review on 9.01 acres.
3. PUD District Review on 9.01 acres.
4. Zoning District Change from R 1-22 to RM-6.5 on 6.59 acres and
Rl-13.5 on 2.42 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of '1.01 acres into 29 lots.
4
' .. ,
"::~ , '=-::
...
Staff Report
Wynstone
May 8, 1998
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission voted to continue discussion on this item and directed the developer to
take another look at density, improve the buffer zone, resolve off site drainage, and provide site
lines from the north, south and west.
REVISED SITE PLAN:
The site plan has two less twinhomes. There are 24 twinhomes and five single family homes. The
density ofthe twinhomes is 3.64 units per acre. The density of the Arbor Glen town homes is
3.77 units per acre.
GRADING AND TREE LOSS:
There are 548 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 334
inches.
The tree replacement required is 266 inches. The landscape plan meets this requirement. All of
these trees are located on the south and west sides of the site.
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
The landscape plan meets the caliper inch requirement based on building square footage. Most of
the caliper inch trees are in the interior ofthe project. Ifthe Commission feels that additional trees
are needed, the'81llount of available land is limited due to a storm sewer line needed to provide
proper rear yard drainage. Staff estimates that 15 more trees could be added.
DRAINAGE:
Sewer and water are available to the site. A NURP pond is shown on the plan. The offsite
drainage plan is a storm sewer pipe in County right of way which does not impact the land to the
south.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Alternative One
If the Planning Commission is believed that compelling reasons have been provided for changing
the Comprehensive Guide plan from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential,
then one option would be to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept
Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to Rl-
Staff Report
Wynstone
May 8,1998
13.5 and RM 6.5 and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated May 8, 1998, subject to the
conditions ofthe staff report dated May 8, 1998, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
3. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and
City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester
prior to grading and tree removal.
Alternative Two .
If the Planning Commission feels that compelling reasons have not been provided to change the
guide plan from low density residential to medium residential, that the plan does not provide a
transition in density, and that tree loss is high, then one option would be to recommend that the
project be continued to meet the guide plan density of 2.5 units per acre.
The staff recommends Alternative One.
7
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
April 10, 1998
Wynstone 1998
Jasper Homes of Waconia
Wilbur Gjersvik, Steven T. and Karen I. Lipe, William B. Bunn, Donald
Flom
East of Baker Road and north of St. Andrew Drive
1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential
to Medium Density Residential on 6.59 acres.
2. PUD Concept Review on 9.01 acres.
3. PUD District Review on 9.01 acres.
4. Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to RM-6.5 on 6.59 acres and
Rl-13.5 on 2.42 acres.
5. Preliminary Plat of 9.01 acres into 31 lots.
\
\ ~ 1-~"""'~"""';'-'I
"1
-i
1
:::: ;
1"1--__
C .-, ,'. " ---! ,., :,,' f.' --~-1
;:
IJ1
o
?O F(:U~
ANAGRAM
Staff Report
Wynstone
April 10, 1998
BACKGROUND:
A plan for 31 lots, 9 single family and 22 twinhomes, was denied by the Council in 1997 due to no
compelling reasons for changing the guide plan, an inadequate transition to single family areas to
the south, and road connections.
The site is currently guided low density residential for up to 2.5 units per acre. Surrounding land
is guided low density to the north, south and west. Land east of Baker Road is low density and
medium density. The site is currently zoned RI-22. Surrounding land is zoned RI-22 to the west,
RI-13.5 to the north and south, and RI-13.5 and RM 6.5 east of Baker Road.
REVISED SITE PLAN:
The site plan has 26 twinhomes and five single family homes. There is no connection to Forest
Hills Road. Candice Lane is a cuI de sac. The twinhomes have a separate entrance on Baker
Road.
The grading plan eliminates the 20 foot high retaining walls along the south property line which
leaves room conifers and shade trees.
The twinhomes are proposed as slab on grade or walkout and designed for the 55 and over
market.
All ofthe single family lots meet the lot size requirements of the RI-13.5 zoning district. All of
the twinhome lots meet the 3,000 square foot lot size requirements of the RM-6.5 district.
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE:
The Planning Commission must decide if there are compelling reasons for changing the
comprehensive plan on a portion of the property to allow 26 twinhomes at a density of3.95 units
per acre.
The proponent believes the guide plan should be changed for the following reasons:
1. The mixed use is consistent with land uses in this part of Eden Prairie.
2. The proposed townhouses are situated to have minimal impact on existing single
family homes. Tree replacement is used to create a buffer to the single family
homes to the south.
3. The proposed town homes are consistent with the City's goal of providing a
--~-----~~~~~---------------------
Staff Report
Wynstone
April 10, 1998
variety of housing.
Reasons for not changing the guide plan are as follows:
1. Arbor Glen Townhouses is the only multiple family development adjacent to the
site across Baker Road. Arbor Glen is a mixed use project. The overall density is
1.96 units per acre. Even though the guide plan graphically shows the townhouses
as multiple, since the density is less than 2.5 units per acre, the City did not require
or approve a guide plan change.
2. The density of the proposed townhouses at 3.95 units per acre is higher than Arbor
Glen Townhouses at 3.77 units per acre.
3. The density is higher than the adjoining neighborhoods.
TRANSITION:
When higher density projects are located next to lower density neighborhoods, the City code
requires a transition. Transition can be created by small increases in density at the edge of
abutting neighborhoods, berming and plantings, and increased setbacks.
The use of a private road, the Candice Lane cuI de sac, and perimeter plantings help create a
transition.
GRADING AND TREE LOSS:
There are 548 caliper inches of significant trees on the property. Tree loss is calculated at 334
inches.
The tree replacement required is 266 inches. The landscape plan meets this requirement.
UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE:
Sewer and water are available to the site. A NURP pond is shown on the plan. Drainage
easements must be acquired by the developer from the property owner to the south or increase
the size of the pond to keep runoff to pre development rates.
SIDEWALKS:
A five-foot wide sidewalk is shown on the plan. The sidewalk on Baker Road must be extended
1/
,
Staff Report
Wynstone
April 10, 1998
to the south property line.
ACCESS:
The access to Baker Road has been approved by Hennepin County.
CONCLUSION:
The current plan is better than the previous proposal for the following reasons.
1. The project provides a buffer to the single family homes to the south.
2. Candice Lane is a cuI de sac.
3. The housing is designed for the 55 and older market.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Alternative One
If the Planning Commission is believed that compelling reasons have been provided for changing
the Comprehensive Guide plan from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential,
then one option would be to recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development Concept
Review, Planned Unit Development District Review, Zoning District Change from Rl-22 to RI-
13.5 and RM 6.5 and Preliminary Plat based on plans dated April 10, 1998, subject to the
~onditions of the staff report dated April 10, 1998, and subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed stonn water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the Watershed District.
B. Submit detailed stonn water runoff, utility and erosion control plans for review by
the City Engineer.
2. Prior to Building Pennit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee.
B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements.
/~
------------------------
Staff Report
Wynstone
April 10, 1998
C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review.
D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review.
3. Prior to grading, the proponent shall notify the City Engineer, Watershed District, and
City Forester. Construction fencing must be in place and approved by the City Forester
prior to grading and tree removal.
Alternative Two
If the Planning Commission feels that compelling reasons have not been provided to change the
guide plan from low density residential to medium residential, that the plan does not provide a
transition in density, and that tree loss is high, then one option would be to recommend that the
project be continued to meet the guide plan density of2.5 units per acre.
The staff recommends Alternative One.
!)
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 11, 1998
Page 2
A. WXNSTONE, continuation, by Jasper Development. Request for Comprehensive
Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
on 6.95 acres, Rezoning from Rl-22 to Rl-13.5 and RM-6.5 on 9.01 acres,
Preliminary Plat on 9.01 acres into 3110ts and Site Plan Review on 6.95 acres.
Location: 7102, 7126 & 7128 Baker Road.
Planner Franzen introduced Jim Jasper, of Jasper Development, and asked him to
give his report to the Commission. He requested that Jasper address how the
developer has taken another look at the density, talk about the changes in the
buffer zone, and how to resolve the off-site drainage.
Larry Harris, Jasper Development's attorney, addressed the Commission with the
following report:
The developer has reduce the number of town home units from 26 to 24, this .
reduced the multi-family density from 3.95 to 3.64 units.
In terms of increasing the buffer: Landscaping and plantings have been moved to
the southeast of the development, which is the area that the screening issues were
raised. At a previous Planning Commission meeting the Planning Commission had
asked the developer to consider adding sidewalks to back of the lots. Harris told
the Commission there is a public safety issue in the fact that the grade of the area is
over 40 percent, which would make the land unsuitable for public sidewalks.
In terms ofthe stormwater drainage issue: Jasper Development has had meetings
with Hennepin County and is proposing that Jasper Development will construct a
new storm sewer line in the roadway right-of-way of Baker Road, the Hennepin
County roadway right-of-way, discharging into the low area on the north end of
St. Andrews. The issue of private easements will be resolved because the entire
line will be on Hennepin County right-of-way. This solution will also alleviate the
problem that the City currently has with a storm sewer line which is encroaching
on private property in this area.
Gene Ernst, landscape architect, gave a visual presentation of the revised
landscape plans, both in plan view and in section view.
Sandstad expressed concerns that the 6-and-8-foot-high retaining walls would -
need to have some type of safety fencing installed at their tops, along with the
planned plantings.
Planner Franzen stated staff is recommending approval according to the
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 11, 1998
Page 3
recommendations of the last two pages of the staff report.
Foote opened the floor to the public for their comments.
No public concerns were raised on the Wynstone application.
Foote asked for comments from the Commission.
Sandstad spoke in favor of the project; although, he, again, expressed his concern
for safety issues at the tops of the retaining walls. He asked the developer to
consider installing a split-rail fence in these areas.
Dorn, too, expressed his concern about the retaining wall height. He suggested
that the retaining walls be built in stages: A four foot height, then step back to
another height. This would give more eye appeal to the walls and also offer more
green space.
Alexander stated she would vote in favor of the project.
Lewis thanked the developer for addressing the density issue and the drainage
issues. She said she was in favor of the project.
Habicht agreed with Ms .. Lewis' statement and said he was in favor of the project.
Clinton gave the project his approval.
Foote stated his original concern had been tree loss and these concerns have been
addressed in the landscaping plan. He thanked the developer for addressing the
density issue and the storm sewer issues.
MOTION: Alexander moved, seconded by Clinton to close the public hearing.
Motion carried. 7 -o.
MOTION: Alexander moved, seconded by Clinton to recommend to the City
Council approval of the request by Jasper Development for a Comprehensive
Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
on 6.95 acres, Rezoning from Rl-22 to Rl-13.5 and RM-6.5 on 9.01 acres,
Preliminary Plat on 9.01 acres into 29 lots and Site Plan Review on 6.95 acres.
Location 7102, 7126 & 7128 Baker Road, based on plans dated May 5, 1998, and
subject to the recommendation of the staff report dated May 8, 1998. Motion
carried 7 -O.
PLANNING COMMIS~HON MINUTES
April 13, 1998
Page 2
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. WYNSTONE by Jasper Development. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan
Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 6.95 acres,
Rezoning fromRI-22 toRI-13.5 andRM-6.5 on 9.01 acres, Preliminary Plat on 9.01
acres into 31 lots and Site Plan Review on 6.95 acres. Location: 7102, 7126 & 7128
Baker Road.
Jim Jasper and Larry Harris gave a presentation on the project. Harris noted this
project was not approved in 1997 because the City Council determined there was no
compelling reason to change the guide Plan. The plans have been revised to reflect
the changes requested by the City and the residents of the area and are detailed in the
staff report. The landscape plan has been revised and the site has been redesigned to
meet the goal of the City to have more life cycle housing. The development will be
housing for seniors or people 55 and over and features one level housing and no
maintenance exteriors. This project will meet the goals and desires set forth by the
City of Eden Prairie in it's long range housing plans. There will be a private non-
through street for the project. There will be a good deal of landscaping and the
housing will be constructed as townhomes with only one common wall between each
unit. He described the common areas and noted there will be a Homeowners
Association for the maintenance of the property. Prices of the Units will range from
$170,000 to about $210,000 per unit.
Harris reviewed the landscape plan and the plantings around the perimeter of the site
and within the site itself. He noted the improvements they have made to this plan
from the previous plan. He noted the project has been redesigned and is being
specifically marketed to meet a specific need identified by the City, and the Planning
Commission must determine if it is appropriate for this site.
Kipp gave the staff report and noted that the total number of units has not changed
from the previous plan. However, staff recommends approval of Alternative I as
outlined in the staff report.
Foote asked about the amount of tree loss and Kipp responded that it is about 57%
and this was similar to the tree loss for the Maple Hill development where the
topography was such that it was difficult to avoid substantial tree loss in order to
develop the property. Dom asked where the tree loss would occur and Kipp
responded it would be over the entire property. Dom noted that it appeared they
would end up losing most of the trees on the property whenever it was developed.
Clinton asked if the project would have some identification as a senior housing
project. Jim Jasper responded that they would not specifically designate it as a
development for seniors, but their marketing strategy would be directed towards
people in this age group. They have found that when most of the homeowners are in
this age group it tends to discourage younger people from buying in the same
development.
I{
PLANNING COMMIS~.ON MINUTES
April 13, 1998
Page 3
The Public Hearing was opened.
Jim Brandser, 7238 Vervoort Lane, stated he was opposed to the development
because the density has not changed from the previous plan and he felt it would be
a detriment to those homes that are already in the area. He was concerned about the
drainage plan and how it would impact the property to the south. He believed the
density proposed was too high and there was no compelling reason to change the
guiding on the property. He was also concerned about increased traffic from the
development.
John Mallow, Forest Hill road, stated he agreed with Mr .. Brandser that the density
was too high, and was unchanged from the previous proposal. He was concerned
about whether the project would be sold as senior housing and that there were no
restrictive covenants on the property which would guarantee that was how these lots
would be sold. He commented the proposal was a community unto itself and he was
opposed to this because he wanted to see sidewalks connecting their neighborhood
with Forest Hills school so the children do not have to walk along Baker Road to get
to the playgrounds there. He commented he had been told that this was a private
deVelopment and the city cannot require the proponent to construct a sidewalk. He
felt this was very serious and there would be children within the new development.
These neighborhoods should be connected to allow access between them. He was
concerned about the home that is adjacent to the site being moved onto Forest Hill
Road and not being a part of this development, and he thought it should be included.
Terry Willms en, 7265 Vervoort Lane, stated he was concerned about the density
which was too high and the amount of tree loss which would occur on the site. He
would prefer to have single family homes constructed on the site. If the Guide Plan
is changed for this site it will set a precedent for further guide plan changes
throughout the City.
Scott Ringhand, 7270 Vervoort Lane, stated he felt the density was too high and he
was told it would be developed as single family housing when he purchased his home.
He was concerned about the substantial amount of tree loss and noted the view would
be buildings instead of trees as it is now. He commented it will take 40 years for the
trees to grow back the way they are now. He was concerned about how the children
in his neighborhood would be adversely impacted by this development.
Wayne Zeien, 7246 Vervoort Lane, was concerned about the landscaping plan which
was not as complete as he would like to see and he wanted to know if it would be
changed. The plan was not that much different from the earlier one. He was
concerned about the drainage and how the development would impact the drainage
flow to the south. He was concerned about how it would be marketed as being for
"empty nesters" because there were no covenants requiring that it be marketed that
way. He was also concerned about the amount of tree loss, he felt the density was
too high, and the Guiding was for single family housing and he felt it should remain
that way, and was opposed to changing it.
PLANNING COMMIS~.ON MINUTES
April 13, 1998
Page 4
M. Eshmawy, 8724 Crest Road, Bloomington, submitted a letter noting he was the
owner of the property directly south of the proposed development. He stated he was
opposed to the project because the drainage will go across his lot and ruin his
property. He asked the City of Eden Prairie to re-route the drainage from going
across his land. Kipp stated the proponent will have to work with the property owner
to resolve this issue prior to any permit approval for this project.
Marty Camp, Project Engineer, reviewed the drainage plans as they were of such
concern to the residents. He noted they plan to install a NURP pond in the central
portion of the town house development which will provide water storage and it will
be discharged from this NURP pond at the same rate as the existing runoff. This
runoff will flow into the existing storm drainage system, at the same rate as presently
exists on the site.
Ron Harris, 7262 Vervoort Lane, was concerned about the density of the project, and
noted the trees that would replace the existing trees would be much smaller in size.
He asked what size tree would be used in the landscape replacement process. He was
concerned about children playing in the cul,;,de-sac and what the impact of this
development would be on their safety. He was concerned about the traffic that would
be generated from this development.
Lyndon Moquist, 13772 Candice Lane, was concerned about the density which was
too high, and noted he built his home there because he had been assured by City
officials that the land adjacent was guided for single family residential. He thought
the value of the townhomes was too little for Eden Prairie and it would adversely
impact the adjacent property values. He was opposed to changing the zoning or the
Guide Plan to permit this development. He noted there were approximately 150-200
townhomes available in Eden Prairie now, and he did not believe they should be
building more when so many were currently available. He felt the need should revolve
around the buyer rather than the seller.
Foote asked if the proponent had a cross-section which would show the view from
the adjacent properties, and Valerie Rivers, the landscape architect for the project,
stated that the trees they intend to use for the proj ect would be ten feet tall when
planted and they were guaranteed for a year, or they would have to be replaced. They
will use 2.5-3" caliper shade trees, and it will be screened significantly more than the
previous plan. There will be the grade change to break up the view.
Sandstad commented he was concerned about how much flexibility in the design there
was as they often pass things as they are presented. He was also concerned about the
density and the buffering and the amount of screening around the proj ect, as well as
the drainage onto an adjacent property. He commented the average home valuation
in Eden Prairie was not $300,000 to $400,000, but concurred that diversity in housing
types was desired in Eden Prairie.
Foote stated he felt the project was needed but the density was rather high. If one
unit were removed it would not change the view from the west much and it would
PLANNING COMMIS~:.:ON MINUTES
April 13, 1998
Page 5
bring the density down. Even single family residential development would be visible
from the adjacent properties. He was not comfortable with the drainage plan. The
premise could work but the plan needs to be reworked.
Alexander comme~ted the City needs more senior housing but it was not specified
that this development would be senior housing. She felt the density was rather high,
and she was concerned about the drainage onto an adjacent property.
Dorn commented that the City could not specify a certain type of housing or enforce
covenants to that effect. The developer can build a project that the younger people
of Eden Prairie want to buy if he so desires. He asked about the house on top of the
hill and how much of the hill would be rem()ved. The Engineer reviewed the existing
topography on the site and noted that it flows from north to south and the existing
high point on the south part is at the 908 elevation. The foundations for the garages
will be at about the 902 elevation. They will take off about ten feet on the north and
about five feet on the southern portion of the site. Dorn inquired if the proponents
intended to secure an easement for drainage over the property to the south, and the
engineer responded that the existing storm system along Baker Road flows into catch
basins along Baker Road and St. Andrews Road. They will be required to discharge
drainage from the NURP pond at the predetermined rate of not more than goes out
now. Discussion ensued regarding the needed easement for the existing storm sewer
system as well as the proponent's drainage plan. Jasper stated that water is being
discharged onto private property without benefit of an easement and they have been
required to resolve this problem with M. Eshmawy.
Lewis commented she concurred there was a need for senior housing in the City but
was concerned about this development being used for that purpose. Sh~ was also
concerned about the drainage issue as well as the density. Kipp noted staff checked
with the City Attorney regarding the issue of requiring the developer to declare the
property as a senior housing project and had been advised that to do this would not
violate any civil right the developer has as age was not held to be a discriminating
element in the area of housing.
Sandstad commented he was not concerned about this project being purchased by
other people and he did not want to get into requiring them to sell to a particular
market. He believed that the type of housing built would determine who would buy
it. Jasper concurred with Sandstad and noted the developer of a project does things
required by the City that will appeal to a certain type of homeowner. He did not
want to have a requirement put on an approval that would limit the product to a
certain type of homeowner.
Jasper discussed the issue of the density and commented that in order to provide
affordable housing for this age group, it was necessary to construct the units at a level
that made it possible for the development to succeed. If the Planning Commission felt
the density was too great for the site then there was no point in discussing it further.
This housing was meant to allow people 55 and older that want to scale down to have
some affordable housing that is in the vicinity of where they presently reside. They
PLANNING COMMIS~J.ON MINUTES
April 13, 1998
Page 6
believe the landscaping plan is excellent and he did not know what more the City
could want,. He noted the drainage issue can be resolved, and they are willing to
consider changes.
MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Foote, to continue the Public Hearing for
30 days to allow the proponent to resolve the issues of density, to provide cross
sections of the views from adjacent properties from the south, west, and north, and
resolve the drainage issue with the property owner to the south. The issue of
pedestrian safety should be reviewed, and the proponent should consider connecting
sidewalks to Candice Lane. Motion carried 6-0.
Sandstad commented there are at least four parties involved in the drainage issue, and
it might take longer than 30 days to resolve it.
LANG, PAULY, GREGERSON & ROSOW, LTD.
ROBERT I. LANG
ROGER A. PAULY
DAVID H. GREGERSON"
RICHARD F. ROSOW+
MARK J. JOHNSON
JOSEPH A. NILAN"
TODD A. SATTLER
JENNIFER M. INZ
JAMES W. DELAPLAIN
·Also Admitted in Wisconsin
+Certified as a Real Property Specialist
by the Minnesota State Bar Association
Mr. Michael Franzen
Eden Prairie City Offices
8080 Mitchell Road
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
U.S. BANK PLACE
1600 PARK BUILDING
650 THIRD A VENUE SOUTH
MIN "NEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-4337
TELEPHONE: (612) 338-0755
FAX: (612) 349-6718
May 7, 1998
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
RE: Jasper Development Corporation of Waconia
Wynstone Addition
Dear Mr. Franzen:
EDEN PRAIRIE OFFICE
SUITE 370
250 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344
TELEPHONE: (612) 829-7355
FAX: (612) 829'()713
REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
You have forwarded to me the April 30, '1998 letter of attorney R. Lawrence Harris which
addresses the question of whether an age restriction could be placed on the residents of the
townhome portion of the Wynstone Addition (the project). You have asked that I review the
letter and render our opinion as to whether age restrictions are allowable under law .
• Mr. Harris' letter notes the specific provisions of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.
Stat. § 363.03, Subd. 2, which defmes unfair discriminatory practices. This section of the
Minnesota law makes it an unfair discriminatory practice to refuse to sell real property to any
person because of, among other things, familial status. An exemption is found under Minn. Stat.
§ 363.02, Subd. 2 for "housing for elderly persons." The Federal Fair Housing Act contains a
similar exemption for "housing for older persons."
In addition to reviewing the above, I also reviewed relevant case law, including the case
law cited in Mr. Harris' letter. I find most analogous to the instant situation the case of Lanier
v. Fairfield Communities, Inc., 776 F. Supp. 1533 (M.D. Fla. 1990). Fairfield Communities
attempted to exclude from residency in the housing project persons under the age of 18. The
restriction was challenged as a violation of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 which
prohibits discrimination in housing against families with minor children. The Act contains the
exception referred to in Mr. Harris' letter for "housing for older persons." Essentially, the
residential community in Lanier did not qualify under the exemption in the Fair Housing Act
because it did not have "significant facilities and services specifically designed to meet the
physical or social needs of older persons." 776 F. Supp. at 1537. The term "significant facilities
and services" is used in one of the exceptions provided under the Minnesota Human Rights Act
where there is occupancy by at least one person 55 years of age or older per unit. The Federal
/' I
c'
LANG, PAULY, GREGERSON & ROSOW, LTD.
Mr. Mike Franzen
May 7,1998
Page 2
Fair Housing Act has been amended since Lanier was decided. The exemption that required
significant facilities and services in order to qualify where there is occupancy by at least one
person 55 years of age or older per unit has been removed from the Act. The requirements under
federal law are now that:
1. At least 80% of the occupied units are occupied by at least
one person who is 55 years of age or older;
11. The housing community publishes and adheres to
policies and procedures that demonstrate the intent
required under this subdivision; and
111. The housing community complies with the federal
rules for verification of occupancy.
Another exemption, however, is allowed for housing that is intended for and solely occupied by
a person 62 years of age or older. This exemption under both federal and state law does not
require "significant facilities and services" be furnished.
Subsequent to Lanier, the United States Court of Appeals decided the case of Massaro v.
Mainlands Section 1 & 2 Civic Association, Inc., 3 F.3d 1472 (11th Cir. 1993). In this case the
United States and a homeowner bn~ught action against the homeowners association alleging
discrimination against families with children. The issue in this case was not whether the
association provided services and facilities, but whether it complied with the requirement of
publishing and adhering to policies and procedures that demonstrated the intent required under
the Fair Housing Act. The District Court found in favor of the Association but on appeal, the
Court of Appeals reversed finding that the Association did not properly verify the ages of
residents. Further, the court found that the Association's restrictive covenants only had a
prohibition in the declaration against children under 16 years of age and that this was not a
sufficient basis for the exemption. I point this case out to show the strict application of the
statute when an exemption is invoked.
It is my opinion that the developer of Wynstone Addition could restrict the townhome
project to senior housing under state and federal law, but only if:
1. The townhomes are provided under a federal or state program that the state
determines is specifically designed and operated to assist elderly persons;
or
LANG, PAULY, GREGERSON & ROSOW, LTD.
Mr. Mike Franzen
May 7, 1998
Page 3
2. The townhomes are intended for and solely occupied by persons 62 years
of age or older; or
3. The townhomes are intended for occupancy by at least one person 55 years
of age or older per unit and provided:
(a) significant facilities and services to meet the physical and social
needs of older persons or if that was not practicable, that the
housing is necessary to provide important housing opportunities for
older persons. (State law requirement only);
(b) that at least 80% of the units were occupied by at least one person
55 years of age or older;
(c) that there was publication of adherence to policies and procedures
demonstrating an intent by the owner to provide housing for
persons 55 years of age or older; and
(d) the housing community complies with the federal rules for
verification of occupancy. (Federal law requirement).
It is not permissible to simply limit occupancy by age by excluding minors from the
townhome project.. Based on the above, in order to avoid violating both state and federal law
prohibiting discrimination based on familial status, a significant commitment needs to be made
to provide housing for elderly persons. I do not know whether the Planning Commission
contemplated such a significant commitment when discussing the issue of whether an age
restriction could be placed on the residents of the townhome portion of the project.
If you need further information or wish to discuss this, please call.
Very truly yours,
ERSON & ROSOW, LTD.
RFRlsmk
rfrlep\franzen.505
May 7,1998
Chairman Ken Clinton
RICHARD M. FEERICK
13995 SAINT ANDREW DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55346
Planning Commission Members
City of Eden Prairie
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Dear Chairman Clinton and Planning Commission Members:
612-937-1821
Thank you for your time reviewing the Wynstone project and determining an appropriate
recommendation.
My wife and I live in the Jasper Homes St. Andrews Bluff townhouses. We are very fortunate to
live here. It fits our life style and is in a very fine neighborhood.
I was one of the developers of Arbor Glen. The townhouses and single family homes were built
at the same time. They complement one another. Both have appreciated in value.
Wynstone will be a similar type of project. The twin homes and single family homes represent
distinctive and separate neighborhoods. Both will appreciate in value. The twin homes provide
a wonderful opportunity for seniors to remain in our community and enjoy a pleasant life style.
Eden Prairie has had a tradition of reaching out to all of its residents and addressing the overall
common good. This tradition is very important to our community.
Thank you for your consideration of these thoughts . .
Sincerely,
JUN-08-98 MON 02: 44 PM NORWES'(H-;-;-L-;;:UU:-;-;:M~l N~li::::TU:-::-N:-I:~t5~~--r H-X-NU-. -b-l-~tl-j-Utl-~-U -/ --
Date: 6/8/98
To: Mike Franzen
City Planning Commission Members
From: Wayne Zeien
7246 Vervoort Lane
Eden Prairie
Re: Wynstone Development by Jasper Development
Dear Mike and Planning Commission Members:
Tonight the council will be voting on the Jasper Development's Wynstone project off of
Baker Road. I live directly south of this proposed site and will not be able to be at the
meeting tonight due to an unexpected work emergency. I would however like to make
the following points.
1. The Comprehensive Guide Plan for the city currently has this property zoned at
single family. This was one of the primary reasons that we purchased OUT home 5 years
ago. We, as did our neighbors, visited the city offices to be sure of the zoning of this
land. We would not have bought our home here had we suspected that the city would
ignore the comprehensive guide plan and rezone the property because a builder asks.
This is the main point with this development -THE PROPERTY DOES NOT NEED TO
BE REZONED FOR TIllS DEVELOPMENT -THE PROPERTY CAN BE EASILY
DEVELOPED FOR SINGLE F AMIL Y HOMES.
r. UlIU,J
2. This property had a similar project rejected a few years ago because to the need to
change the density. And also Jasper Development wanted to change the development for
the same project. but they were voted down because there was not sufficient evidence that
the zoning change was needed. Because of these two prior decisions it would contrary to
the planning commisions own record to approve rezoning this property at this time.
Although Mr. Jasper has made improvements to the plan, THE PROPERTY IS
BEING CONSIDERED FOR REZONING EVEN THOUGH IT HAS BEEN SEEN AS
NOT NECESSARY IN THE PAST!
JUN-08-98 MON 02:44 PM NORWEST BLOOMINGTON EBS FAX NO. 6128308907
3. I have many concems about the transistion from this property to my back yard.
Although the plans show a fair amount of screening. 10 foot conifers. I feel that the
height of the twin homes will still mean that these homes will be looming over my home.
4. My other concern is the property that is at the end of Vervoort Lane. The owner
ofthis property has already stated publicly that if this development is approved he will
demand that the council approve the same rezoning on his property. This is not
acceptable due the the number of small children on Vervoort Lane and the increase in
traffic.
Please, remember that the land has already been voted down twice prior for rezoning.
The design of the more dense plan does not change the fact that rezoning this property
goes against the comprehensive guide plans, and the information given to the neighbors
who have bought their homes several years ago.
P. U2/U3
Please call with any questions that you may have. I would be more than happy to discuss
this with you.
Sincerely.
()~L;--Wayne~ien
work 830-7107
home 975-0550
H** I have also attached a e-mail from my neighbor Jim Brandser who is out oftown on
business and unable to attend the meeting.
JUN-OS-9S MON 02:45 PM NORWEST BLOOMINGTON EBS
Zeien, Wayne
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
(MNIMT)
"Bo _ Brandser"@dgiLcom
613@compuserv.com; Zeien, Wayne
Jasper
Monday. June DB, 1998 1: 17PM
FAX NO. 612830890'(
(MNIMT)
1. In 1993, when considering a move to eden prairie{on Vervoort Lane).1 did
my research and the land above us was zoned single-family. This was
important to me in choosing a place to raise my family. Now it appears that
you are changing the rules by changing the density and I have seen no
compelling reason for the change other than Mr. Jasper wanting to make a
bigger profit. The multi-family does not fit existing homes nor is it '
consistent with guide plan. THIS LAND DOES NOT HAVE TO BE DEVELOP~D into
townhomes!
2. Jaspers has 5 homes that buffer the Candice Lane homes ( that are
similar homes). The townhomes that will be next to the Vervoort homes do
not provide the same conSistency nor acceptable transition.
3. Arbor Glenn was built prior to any of the homes around it. The home
owners had a choice to buy, knowing to the town homes were already built
there. Mr. Jasper's example of the Arbor Glen neighborhood. to his
project, is not a fair comparison.
4. If this project is approved. the land south of Jasper development,
will have a open door to build townhomes. This means more cars driving
through a neighborhood of many children. Why even design guideplans, to
protect our neighbor hoods, when they can be altered for any builder who
can complain and petition to have densities changed for bigger prOfits.
5. The walking path disturbs me very mUCh. The idea of strangers walking
just yards from my children, two dogs and our deck seems like an invasion
of our privacy and safety. Eden Prairie is known for is parks and walking
paths, I feel another path is not needed.
6. Council Members before you vote I ask you to put yourself in our
pOSition -Please do not approve this density change.
Page 1
P. Uj/Uj
Date: May 19,1998
Memo:
To: Mayor and City Council, and Planning Commission
From: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner
Subject: Wynstone Public Hearing
The Planning Commission first reviewed this project on April 13, 1998 and made a motion to
continue the project for 30 days. At the May 11, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended
approval. No residents were present.
After finding out that the project was approved, residents asked staff why they did not receive a
notice. After explaining the commission recommendation for continuance, many residents felt
that the City should do a better job of communication. Several residents asked me to consult with
the City attorney about a potential violation of the public hearing process.
Ric Rosow advises that the City must do more than communicate a two week or 30-day
continuance. The hearing must be continued to a date certain.
The Planning Commission vote for approval was not valid since it occurred 28 days after the first
hearing. Even though staff and the Planning Commission know that 30 days means two meetings
later, it does not satisfy the law.
Staff is republishing the project for the June 8, 1998 Planning Commission meeting and the June
16, 1998 City Council meeting.
Planning Commissioners/City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, MN. 55344
Dear City Representatives,
4/17/98
Housing for senior citizens has become a city mission overriding concerns of
current residents. The Jasper development called Wynstone at Baker Road has
become a scam. The developer has misrepresented his plans to the city and
residents of Eden Prairie. Is the commission's loyalty to a developer or the
citizens of Eden Prairie?
The meeting held April 9th at Eden Prairie Center by Jasper Development
raised many concerns; first, the intent of the development. The developer
insists there is a pressing need for senior housing and this would fulfill that
need. If intended for senior citizens, wouldn't it be appropriate to include a
covenant to allow only seniors to purchase the property? Mr. Jasper's
representative stated it would be illegal. When at the public hearing this
concern was raised again at least two commission members agreed. After
much discussion, city planners said that the City Attorney had assured the
commission it is legal. While illegal to discriminate on the basis of race,
gender, and religion, age can be used. After the commission was told, they
stated a covenant was unnecessary. Why does the commission side with the.
developer by saying that a covenant would be illegal, then when told a
covenant is legal agree with the developer again that it is unnecessary?
Another concern raised was the Flom home not being included as part of the
submitted plan. Jasper stated, "If the house is brought up to code it can put
anywhere we want it, and that can be done without any public hearing. II This
issue was raised again at the public hearing. The planning commission sent it
back to the planning department without addressing the Flom home. In the
interim I have found the planning department was unaware of Mr. Jasper's
plan. Mr. Jasper mislead attendees; moving a home into an existing
neighborhood requires a public hearing.
A third concern is safety and a closed neighborhood. This development will
have a private sidewalk encircling it, not connected with Candice Lane.
During the development of Candice Lane I requested a sidewalk connecting
Forest Hill to Theresa. Our children now go to Forest Hills School without
travelling on busy Baker Road. Children play between Candice and Forest Hills
and there are many adults contacts. Connecting communities has been
positive.
The last issue is density. Density changes will affect adjoining
neighborhoods. The public hearing addressed water run-off. The Baker Road
storm sewer built in 1985 was sized for low density housing, lower than
recommendation, with the understanding that ponds would be built. Now
owners are trying to change the density and reduce the pond sizes to
maximize their return. They are trying to put 10 pounds into a 5 pound bag.
The main concern of this· developer has always been return on investment.
Whatever can be done for the greatest return, from reducing sewer size, to
removing all the trees, to increasing density. The concern has never been the
city or community. It's time to refuse. They need to start over by developing
a plan to meet the City's plan and finish Forest Hill Road with a cul-du-sac.
People left the public hearing of April 13th feeling many issues were never
addressed. Whether it is the intent or the precedent that has been
established, the format favors the developer. He presents his plan, then
residents bring forward issues. The developer presents his plan again now
knowing concerns of the commissioners and community. The commissioners
then discuss it. Many concerns the residents present do not get addressed, i.e.
movement of the Flom house. Secondly, the developer get to react to/adjust
a second presentation based on knowing salient information. The public has
no second chance or recourse. •
Public hearings need time limits but there are changes that could greatly
enhance communication. First, each issue should be answered as it is
brought up. Secondly, residents should have the opportunity to ask questions
of the developer. It hardly encourages participation in government if issues
which have been voiced are unaddressed by the process.
Thank you for your attention.
John E. Mallo
14000 Forest Hill Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
937-9309 or 937-2926
Tn' r;-h.! Pbnn-incr "j:'nO'-in~f>1"
-~. -~-_' -~---~~~~-o -~-o-~---·
From: IvI. Eshma\\/v
r,;E; Drainage
Aprii10.1998
I am the owner of the property iegal1y described as iot 2 i Auditor's
<' .• 1_.j:~.: .. : "._ ,.,,...,,
,JUUUIVl,'.)lVll "'~,J.
T ~1'" ()TU"1f'O::lno' thp TqO::np'r nf>Vpj0rll"11pnt nrf}~p,...t If}(,'1ted ()n Rf-'lkf'1" ... -.... ~ ... '-"rr---................ C' ....... ':"-"' ............. r-.... --....-.w ..... ...,r ........... -.......... r .... I.,..;J--....... --c..;..~ _ ... A.,..,~ .... __ ...
Street. I stromziv beheve that if this deveiooment will be built mv iand win - -~ ~
be ruined. \Vhy? \Vell, Jasper Development is planning to build ap
e:lsement on !!'!e comer oE my lot. Furthermore, the drainage from their
houses will pour jnto mv lot. ruining: the soil on mv lot. I feel like I have no . ." --~hoice in this situation. although I own titis piece of land. There must be
something th!lt C2!1 be done to stop this drainage.
p.jso. originaHy. from reading the zoning plans for this area of Eden
I'rairie, it staks that ali houses pla:ilned fvr the 10l:s available are to be made
.:!:(;!" the needs ()f a single iun:!.ily. Not to'\,vnhouses. Furthermore, from looking
at the plans for Jasper Deveiopmentls houses, they are all drawn to
townhouses. This will depreciiit~ the value of the houses in this area,
';p('l n r11-rlO' ,~?h!1-t T rlP{'~riP tn hnilr! f'm TnV l()t
-~--~---·--o .. -~------.-------.----~-'_' -_v.
i wouid greatly appreclte you looking aU o'f this over. and considering
<ill these changes lilOie closely.
~ .
,,;1'1 rprpi,.
"-1 ............ - _ .... _ .... .), ; ___ ;
,A-/// E'I/ / (') ;r-/--·k· ----/_ '-------i --.--------------y-I--
'If 'P "h Tn !HVV V' ..... ~_& -....~ ................... -.. ..i
8724 Crest Road
T)1.·-... :<_v ... ~ .• 11. nT c:: .,-".:',
UIVVllllllt:-l.Vll, lVll 'Ii., ,J ,J~"',J
ft;l'l\ ~~SL~dT) '-_. --.1 ----.. -
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 7-7-98
SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS JL (J ITEM NO.
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Community Development
Chris Enger CAMP EDENWOOD
Scott A. Kipp
Requested Council Action:
The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action:
1. Close the Public Hearing.
Changes since the Commission Review:
Since the Planning Commission and Park Commission meetings, Friendship Ventures' Board of Directors
has made the decision not to remodel the existing dining hall or dormitory. The Board's decision is to
construct a new free standing dining hall of about 4,000 to 5,000 sq. ft. located more central to the site, and
to leave the existing dining hall as is, but continue to use it on a seasonal basis. If the City is successful with
obtaining historic restoration funding then Friendship Ventures would cooperate to the extent possible in
remodeling the structures.
This is a significant change in the proposal from the plans reviewed thus far during the public hearing process,
and will require development of new plans and a new public hearing process.
Background:
In December of 1996, the City Council approved plans by Friendship Ventures for construction of a 15,000
square foot multi-use building, including a new dining hall to meet requirements and timing of the Hennepin
County Department of Health. The proposal showed the removal of the existing dining hall structure, which
was being evaluated for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places.
Friendship Ventures later notified the City that the funds necessary to construct the facility were not
forthcoming, and would need to change their plans for a smaller building. With demolition aside, the
evaluation for National Register of Historic Places was completed and found eligible for inclusion in the
National Register in the area of health and medicine as a significant and rare example of a facility constructed
for the treatment of children infected with tuberculosis.
City staff and Friendship Ventures worked to save the existing historic structure. The City Council directed
staff to complete the National Register nomination for the property.
The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the proposal and was comfortable with the direction of the
/
project.
Concern of the cost of restoration vs. new construction was then raised by Friendship Ventures. This
prompted staff to prepare a cost estimate to restore the historic structure, as proposed in the Friendship
Ventures plan. The estimate was then compared with new construction costs provided by Friendship
Ventures.
The estimate for new construction (based on a 9,000 sq. ft. new building) was approximately $96 per square
foot. Restoration of the dining hall as proposed was approximately $101 per square foot. The difference
was not considered significant since the restoration is for approximately 3,200 sq. ft., or $15,000 additional
cost vs. new construction.
Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendation:
The commission reviewed the plans at its May 18, 1998, and June 15, 1998 meeting and voted 5-0 for a
recommendation of approval..
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The commission voted 6-0 for a recommendation of approval at its June 8, 1998 meeting, including a shift
in the building location to eliminate encroachment on to Twin Cities & Western Railroad property.
Park & Recreation Commission Recommendation:
The commission vote 7-0 for a recommendation of approval at its June 15, 1998 meeting.
Supporting Reports:
1. Letter from Friendship Ventures dated June 24, 1998
2. Staff Report dated June 5, 1998
3. Supplemental Staff Report from Park & Rec. dated June 10, 1998
4. Cost comparisons for restoration vs. new construction
5. Heritage Preservation Commission Minutes dated May 18, 1998 and June 15, 1998
6. Planning Commission Minutes dated June 8, 1998
7. Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes dated June 15, 1998
_4-98 03:15 PM FRIENDSHIP VENTURES 320 274 3238
•
June 24, 1998
MEMO
Friendship Ventures
Operating Camp Friendship and Eden Wood Center
SeTl'ing Children and Adulrj' With Disabilities for 34 Years
10509 108TH ST. NW * ANNANDALE, MINNESOTA ~~302 ~ (320) 274·837()
TO: Eden Prairie City Staff
FROM: Ed Stracke, President
RE: Eden Wood Project
P.02
For the time being, Friendship Ventures (FV) has decided to abandon all plans to remodd the existing
dining hall and dormitory. This will allow the city more time to have the Eden Wood site considered
for th~ National Historic Registry and to submit an application for historic preservation funding. If lhe
city is successful in obmining a grant for historic preservation, FV will cooperat~ to the extent possible
in remodeling these structures. In the Interim, FV will continue to use the historic structures on a
seasonal basis.
FV would still like to pursue a plan to construct an 1,800 sq. ft. maintenance/storage building and a
4,000·5,000 sq. ft. program center that woule! indude a dining are~ for approximately 100 people,
kitchen, restrooms and office space. The size and location and oth~r design features will depend on the
following:
1. What will the city allow in terms of size, location and design?
2. Will the city participate in some way with the cost of water and sewer?
3. If thl! existing road and parking area remains the same, will they need to be paved? Do all new
roads and parking areas need to be paved if tht:y are replacing existing areas used for tht! same
purpose? Since there are no ordinances that dictate the exact number of parking spaces needed,
how will the number of parking spaces be determined?
4. Could a small restroom be added to the existing dining hall? If so. would city water and sewer
need to be brought in to accoml1l0d,lle this addition.
5. To "match" the look of the historic buildings, can the extt:rior finish be something other than
brick and glass?
6. What process would we need to follow to get these revised plans approved by the city? Could
this process be shortened?
If possible, I would like to discuss these items at our meeting on Thursday, June 25. Please call if you
have questions.
I'i
~
ii.
0)
I'i
('-j
I'i
'1 r--
c--r
to
w
~
t-
Z
W
H
r:t
LL
.,.---L]<-L~h'Hj
i D.'/~
I
Pn fostA {out~",,~...
{'J ow P '''OJ f")I ~
'* o o
"'l'-.:Ii'1Nlr"~ ( .. ~fIICa"" • TIP: ~
.,.,.....,..1D~
1I_,."....,rc:IR .... ""-#
"'--..GI' ... ,.... ...... _ .... ... ,.~-~ . --,-»-..... . -
LANDSCAPE PLAN
............... --....-· ........ --~ .......... ~ ...... ---· .-----------....... ---~""'.""'J ---..................... ,--, --.. ~-..--# ........... --or •• ~~#--. --.. -'-'"--
~.~.......-...-. .. ------· ...-.. --_ ..... ... --
,
•
""" .. -.'--.... , ...
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
FEE OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
Planning Commission
Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner
June 5, 1998
Camp Edenwood
Friendship Ventures
City of Eden Prairie
6350 Indian Chief Road
1. PUD Concept Review on 52.4 acres.
2. PUD District Review on 2 acres.
3. Zoning District Amendment in the Public district on 2 acres.
4. Site Plan Review on 2 acres.
'61
CA
-.--.~ ~-m-··--~ ~ D ~ '" I I -1 ~~JL..,.L-~~ _.-.-----~ _I;..-I-.JI.-~·
!!61.'6If1tS
____________ "£!~~£!-----=1
STORII SEllER DISTRICT OOUtVAAY
SOIOQ DISTRICT OOUVAAY
WI,rl1'f"ltI"''' nr"TJHf"T fV'\'"nIAy
f.:l
t.t::
~ (:."1
.:
.,;
" R I·····
~ !O;')
~;.:,
,~:5
I£N-£I'IN cowry. IIIN-£SOTA
GEt.E1W.. SERVIC£S DEI'AAT~NT
TA>1'AYfR SfRVICfS OIVISICfj
Staff Report
Camp Edenwood
June 5,1998
BACKGROUND
This site is owned by the City of Eden Prairie and leased to Friendship Ventures for a camp and
retreat center serving children and adults with developmental disabilities. The property was once the
home of the Glen Lake Children's Camp for treating children with tuberculosis.
In December of 1996, the City Council approved plans by Friendship Ventures for construction of
a 15,000 square foot multi-use building, including a new dining hall to meet requirements and timing
of the Hennepin County Department of Health. The proposal showed the removal of the existing
dining hall structure, which was being evaluated for eligibility to the National Register of Historic
Places.
Construction of the new facility was to take place in the fall of 1997. Near the time of proposed
construction Friendship Ventures notified the City that the total funds necessary to construct the
facility were not forthcoming, and they would need to change their plans for a smaller building to be
constructed in 1998. With demolition aside, the evaluation for National Register of Historic Places
was completed and the City was notified that the Camp was eligible for inclusion in the National
Register in the area of health and medicine as a significant and rare example of a facility constructed
for the treatment of children infected with tuberculosis.
City staff and Friendship Ventures have worked together on design and site options which could save
the existing historic structure, and have the site placed on the National Register of Historic Places.
The Heritage Preservation Commission has reviewed the current proposal and is comfortable with
the direction of the project.
SITE PLAN
The current proposal is for a new 4,860 square foot single-story dining hall facility to be connected
to the existing historic structure for a total of 8,140 square feet. The existing structure will be
rehabilitated to maintain the Historic Register criteria and will be used for primarily for meeting space.
The Public zoning district does not specify a maximum base area ratio or floor area ratio requirement.
However, based on the overall site area, the building coverage is low.
Building setbacks in the Public district are 50 feet for the front, rear, and one side, with a total of 150
feet for both sides. The new construction is shown to cross on to property owned by the Twin Cities
& Western Railroad. Friendship Ventures is pursuing acquisition of a portion of the railroad property
for inclusion in the site. If this is successful, the side yard setback to the new lot line would be 10 feet
requiring a waiver through the PUD. If the acquisition is not successful the building will need to be
relocated off the railroad property as shown on the alternate plan. This would also require a side yard
setback waiver to 9 feet. In either case, the waiver may have merit since the building location is based
on maintaining the historic integrity of the existing building. Staffis comfortable with either option.
7
Staff Report
Camp Edenwood
June 5,1998
A total of 41 new paved parking spaces are proposed. Parking requirements for this unique use is
not defined by City code. In these circumstances, parking is based on the needs of the use. Since the
clients of the camp are brought to the site by bus, parking has been based on staff and visitor needs
as defined by the camp administrator. A waiver through the PUD will be necessary for a 0 foot
setback to the parking area. City Code requires 10 feet. The waiver has merit since this parking is
located on an existing gravel parking area which has been used for many years, and it will minimize
any additional tree loss.
SHORELAND ORDINANCE
Birch Island Lake is classified as a Recreational Development Water by the Shore land Code. The
code requires structures to maintain at least a 200 foot setback from the ordinary high water level of
the lake. The proposed building will be setback approximately 230 feet meeting City code. The
shore and bluff impact zones will not be impacted by this proposal.
GRADINGJDRAINAGE
Minimal alteration ofthe site will be necessary. A tree inventory has been provided for the camp
portion of the property. Significant tree loss is 12%, or 541 caliper inches. Tree replacement is 86
caliper inches. Since the landscaping plan provides 45 caliper inches of trees beyond the landscaping
requirement, these additional caliper inches can be applied toward tree replacement. Therefore, 41
caliper inches of tree replacement will be necessary to meet code requirements.
Storm water run-off from the parking area will be directed to a storm water drainage basin proposed
on the north side of the new parking area.
UTILITIES
Sanitary sewer and water is currently connected to the administration building near Indian Chief
Road. The existing dining hall uses a cesspool. The State Plumbing Code does not permit the use
of cesspools. The Public zoning district requires municipal sewer and water. The project will need
to be served by municipal sewer and water meeting City and State codes.
ARCHITECTURE
The new portion of construction will be connected to the existing historic structure. The Public
district requires the use of at least 75% face brick and glass for exterior building materials. The new
building will blend with the old using similar design features and will be constructed with a wood
exterior. This will require a waiver which has merit since it is key to maintaining the historic integrity
of the existing structure.
LANDSCAPING
Based on the new building size, a total of 15 caliper inches of landscaping is required. The plan
Staff Report
Camp Edenwood
June 5,1998
provides 60 caliper inches of trees. The additional trees will be credited toward meeting the tree
replacement requirement explained under the Grading section of this report.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Review on 52.4 acres, PUD District Review
with waivers on 2 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Public district on 2 acres, and Site
Plan Review on 2 acres, based on plans dated June 5, 1998, this report, and the following:
1. Prior to City Council Review, the proponent shall:
A. Verify that the acquisition of additional railroad right of way will occur. If the
acquisition will not occur, the plans shall be revised to shift the new construction off
of the railroad property as shown on attachment A.
B. Revise the landscaping plan to show an additional 41 caliper inches of tree
replacement.
2. Prior to grading permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Submit detailed storm water runoff, utility, and erosion control plans for review and
approval by the City Engineer and Watershed District.
B. Notify the City and Watershed District 48 hours in advance of grading.
C. Install erosion control on the property, as well as tree protection fencing at the drip
line of all trees to be preserved near the grading limits of the development. Said
fencing shall be field inspected by the City Forester prior to any grading.
3. Prior to building permit issuance, the proponent shall:
A. Provide a landscape surety equivalent to 150% of the cost of the landscaping
improvements indicated on the approved plan.
B. Submit detailed building plans to the Inspections Department and Fire Marshal for
their review and approval.
4. The following waivers are granted as part of the PUD:
A. Building side yard setback of 9 feet.
B. Parking setback of 0 feet.
C. Exterior material of wood in the Public District.
To:
Through:
From:
Date:
Subject:
BACKGROUND:
Memorandum
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission
Mayor and City /Council
Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Stuart A. FoWanager of Parks and Natural Resources
June 10, 1998
Supplemental Staff Report to the Senior Planner Report for Camp Edenwood
Dated June 5, 1998
The City of Eden Prairie leases Camp Edenwood to Friendship Ventures for use as a camp and retreat
center for children and adults with developmental disabilities.
In 1996, a proposed multi use building was reviewed by the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources
Commission and City Council. This was approved, however, no actual construction took place due
to insufficient funds to do the work, as well as an evaluation of the dining hall for historic registration.
The current plan is to add a single story dining hall to the existing historic structure. Along with the
structure, there would be a new roadway and paved parking spaces.
NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES:
Tree Loss/Mitigation
The 12 acre camp site has 4,500 diameter inches of significant trees on it. The construction of the
roadway and building expansion will affect 30 trees, totaling 541 diameter inches. This results in a
12% loss of significant trees from the camp site. The majority of the trees that will be removed are
maple, basswood, and oak.
Mitigation for the tree loss is 86 caliper inches oflandscaping material. The landscape plan that has
been submitted has 45 caliper inches of trees beyond the landscaping requirement for this site.
Therefore, an additional 41 inches of tree replacement will be necessary to meet the Tree Preservation
Ordinance requirements.
The proposed landscaping for the site includes a number of deciduous and coniferous trees. The trees
/0
that have been selected would provide screening of service areas, as well as replacing some of the
deciduous trees that will be removed with this dining hall addition.
Shoreland Ordinance
Under the Shoreland Code, Birch Island Lake is classified as recreational development waters. The
code requires a 200 foot setback from ordinary high water (OHW) of the lake. The plan shows the
building as approximately 230 feet from the OHW, thereby meeting the requirements under City
Code.
Storm Water Drainage
The proposed method for handling storm water runoff on the site is to channel it to an existing low
area and allow the overflow to run over land into a wetland area north of the existing driveway. The
City Engineering Department has evaluated this plan and will need to give final approval prior to
construction on the site.
RECOMMENDATION:
This project was reviewed at the June 8, 1998 Planning Commission meeting and was approved as
per the staff report of June 5, 1998 on a 6-0 vote. Staff would recommend approval ofthe project
based on the information contained in that planning staff report and the details in this supplemental
staff memo.
SAF:mdd
1/
~/24/1998 11:03 5123375843 MACDONALD & MACK PAGE 02
EDEN WOOD DINING HALL REHABll..ITAIION
COST ESTTh1ATE
This cost estimate was prepared by Robert Mack of MacDonald and Mack Architects, Ltd. at the
request of John Gertz of the City of Eden Prairie. It is based on a site visits on May 27 and June
17, 1998. Assistance was provided by Steve Ripsin of Sheehy Construction, Bob Saumur of
Marvin Wmdows, and Glenn Downes of Garlock-French Roofing. Additional materials used in
the preparation of the estimate include original construction documents, drawings by KMR.
Architects, and a scope of work statement also by KMR. Prices are based on the 1998
HomeTech Remodeling and Renovation Cost Estimator and the 1997 Means Repair &
Remodeling Cost Data as well as personal experience with restoration and preservation projects.
Costs are rounded to the next higher $500.
Assumptions:
• The building met code when it was constructed. The uses have not changed, and there are
no conditions which would be classified as "unsafe," so there is no legal mandate to
upgrade the structure. Existing floor loading is acceptable based on both code at the time
of construction and experience over the past seventy years.
• The building has historic designation and, therefore, the code official has some leeway in
administering the code to preserve the significant features of the building. UBC Section
3403.5.
• The existing double doors on the north side of the east wing will remain in place. The
existing portion of the facility will house two rest rooms, one for men and one for women.
The unis~ toilet in the existing design will be relocated to an area closer to the new dining
room in conjunction with rail road mandated redesign.
• The building is Type V~N (non-rated) construction, not Type V-Noncombustible as shown
on the drawings. A13 such it has a base area limit of 6,000sf. This area can be increased by
100% to a total of 12,OOOsf due to the fact that two sides are readily open to the yards.
No fire-retardant treatments are required.
• Adequate water and sewer facilities are available in the general vicinity of the building.
• Costs for the basic heating, cooling, and electrical systems are pro~rated with the addition.
• A storm cellar/mechanical space was suggested for the area below the current dining hall.
From site observations, it appears that access would be substantially easier in the area
below the proposed addition; this area would be less costly, as well, so no costs arc
included in the renovation
Eden Wood Cost Estimate-l
I :;
i24/1998 11: 03 5123375843 MACDm~ALD ,~ MACV
Work: limn
General interior demolition: Partitions, etc.
Site work: Grading for sloping walks to building entry. Concrete walks.
New entry stairs at three entries.
Foundations: Underpin/rebuild existing piers~ underpin fireplace. Underpin
and repair existing foundation at exterior of mechanical space; remove
interior portions of foundation and replace with beam and piers.
Chimneys: Repair fireplace brick liner; replace damper. Install new supports
for chimney in kitchen area; chimney will be for appearance only. Repoint
exterior of both chimneys.
Floor structure: Level existing flooring with wedges at piers. Add
supplemental members to support ceramic tile. Install new joists at existing
fuel roomlheater room. Install insulation and vapor retarder below floor
Exterior walls modifications: Install 1 W' high-R-value rigid insulation in
stud spaces; cover with 5/8" type-X gypsum board and 3/4" sheathing
boards; total lOR" value approximately 17. Remove cap from wainscot and
blow in fiberglass insulation. 2,320sf@ $8.00
Repair damaged wood at tie fods.
Remove door to mechanical space; install siding boards salvaged from area
of addition
Interior partitions: Wood studs with W' gypsum board, base and trim to
match existing. Painted finish. 11 Olf @ $65.00
Interior ceilings: Gypsum board on wood joists; moisture-resistant in rest
rooms. Painted finish. 520sf@ $5.00
Roofing: Remove existing roofing. Repair sheathing boards. Repair
ventilators. Repair lookouts. Install new rigid insulation with integral
nailing surface. Install flashing. Install fascia at roof edge. Install asphalt
shingles. S,300sf@ $6,50.
Windows: Install new custom-fabricated awning windows .. 32 each @
$550.00.
Doors: Install four new exterior doors to match original configuration: 4 @
$750. Install new interior doors: 6 @ $400.00.
Eden Wood Cost Estirnate·2
}'1 . "-)
PAGE 03
Cost
$ I,SOO
6,500
77,000
20,000.
20,500
18,500
4,000
2,500
7,500
3,000
34,500
18,000
5,500
85/24/1998 11:83 5123375843 ~11ACDOHALD & ~11ACK
Floor finishes: Ceramic tile. Labor only; tile to be donated. 2,806sf@
$9.00
Exterior finishes: Re-stain siding and overhanging eaves including surface
preparation with linseed oil. 3,SOOsf@ $1.75
Folding partitions: Includes operable partitions, overhead supporting truss,
glass infill above top of partition. (480 sf@ $35 = 16,800) + ($10,500).
Rest rooms: Install 10 plumbing fixtures, 4 per rest room plus two drinking
fountains. Ceramic tile floors and wainscot. Thankless water heater. Toilet
partitions. Grab bars. Toilet accessories.
Heating and air conditioning: Includes gas fired furnace/boiler, insulated
ducts, air conditioning, and controls. Hide ducts to maximum degree
practical. Bathroom exhaust fans.
Electrical: Remove existing lighting and wiring. Install new distribution
panel for entire building. Install new lighting and outlets. Hide wiring to
maximum degree practical.
PAt',;E 1214
25,500
6,500
27,500
24,500
18,000
12,500
T otaI Base Construction Cost 333500
Base construction contract cost: ... " $333,500 ($ 10 1.611square foot)
Contingencies @ 15% ...... ,....... 50,000
Professional fees @ 10% ..... ,...... 38,500
Total project cost . . . . . . . . . . .. $422,000 ($ 128. S8/square foot)
Eden Wood Cost Estimate-3
'4
24719'38 II. g..) 6123.':: l5ti4,j MAl....DLInALD & rvlACR PAGE 05
These costs are approximately 13.5% higher than the estimate ofIune 2, 1998. The largest area
of increase relates to the use of ceramic tile for the flooring throughout the building. Although
the tile, itself, will be donated, the cost of the labor is higher than the total cost of the previously
proposed flooring. In addition, the added weight of the ceramic tile will require additional
reinforcement of the existing floor joists. The chimney cost is higher because the chimney in the
existing kitchen will need new steel supports if the lower portion is to be removed for the new rest
rooms. Roofing costs are higher because the roofing contractors do not like to use the
insulation/nailing composite previously suggested. Window costs are higher due to changing
from in-swinging hoppers to out-swinging awnings.
In spite of being higher than previously estimated, these costs still compare favorably with costs
for a new facility. The foundation costs are somewhat higher, but this would be offset by the cost
of demolition of the existing building. The existing structural system is sound, although the floors
will need to be reinforced for the added weight of the ceramic tile; the "sbell" costs thus will be
less for rehabilitation than for new construction. Refinishing the existing exterior Siding will be
less than new siding. The specialized treatment for insulating the walls while retaining the "camp
building" feeling will be somewhat higher than for more typical finishes. Other costs, such as
roofing, windows, floor finishes, plumbing, mechanical systems, and electrical systems will be the
same for both new construction and rehabilitation.
Eden Wood Cost Estimate-4
/j
ReM
6-24.98
P1U.3J1 1>J,~nTrC7N :pw,s.: O"n
1000 G~ CCNDrTIOllS .... ___ .~ .... A---_~ __________
&,500
1001
tOO='
1101
un
1205
lJl.S
l)'13
'I.'"
'1.702
l10.
170t
1710
17n
1'"
~, .. ,
UOl
lI>an<ii~ hmit.
llQ\lg" 'S<t rd>ono.: ..
S"'6tbt~nt
TrUck ZII:1V.1;
T~. "l\Qn",
T~'fClU.<:
;f9~ 'lniler
~ll ~~C ~~_
~yill""
~ r ....
C>~:.:lt CU~~
1'l.A~1 e19~\IP
'ttn~~9 ao., ltWm4'
C&~ n: ...... l
;r~ ...... " ..
n.ooo
1.SOO
~.ooo
9,500
1.000
21,000
-:-
2,500
1,.,00 1.500
1,000 1,000
1,50Q 1..$00
3.500 3.S00
4,000 •• 000
~,JOO a,SOO
',500
1,200 t,20e
1 1
HO 250
.00 aoo
~2,500 U,SO~
1,100 ~,500 5MHo {:;, ~ J 1 S" 1
______ ._ ............... --------4-W .... ----~-~ .... ~-.... ___ w_~ _______________ ~····-··---~~ ___ -6.-..
200l. -.. -..10 '"'"'
%025 ~).t: PU~~
2HO Ut. t:t:Ht.t1 ...
lUO :.....u ..... pin'
21$0 x ... -.,J.1"".s. fJ
:nSf ~,,)<i..:a~
.000 =n:IX.
~o~aoo
LiOQ
l,~CO
~.SOQ
1
%,$00
3,$00
1.)00
....... _----------_ .....................•••••• ------------...... -----------~-.. -~---------.-.. -.--
:,;,,,0
4,:100 ". 'OC
16
1998 15:84 5123778155 I<MR
Ji'l-06-98 rUE. 10: 18 CARLSOH-LAV INt, i NO, FAX NO, 6128726846
fOOO wtlOtl " tUSUel. ___ . __ . ______ ~.w ..... -----~_.
iHO ~o<l Sieling
1501 H4l.l._l<)r; ~xiQ"
UQO ~"e. C:"'p .. Qt,.,.
?OOO ~.XOl$T PK
720' ~l.lloa
7~Ol sheetDetal
'.21 Tib'gla. Sb~le
,uo e.'Ol1o ~ hu~U
300Q pQQU, W~
&111 1I011 ~~ Price
5100 10_ tl<)eH
'~10 W~ W~dOW5
'7~O P~.1;~ .a~~.
Jceo ,.rnISlI:U
......•................. _-_.-
JlJO A.eO'A.I:!. C:.il~~.
,~OO o.r ... ~" T:n ..
nlQ Il1'ywnl
,.4Q ....... 'E'ila/C.u:pa1l
" .. " .p~ilO.eLnt a VWC
.; ~tU'l;!.t:.~r;,-I-~lU;;; l.'~~~.~" ~eP&:n
--'''J:~~:;' ·~~·t.l"'i~ lJ .. u
n,ut
l'.§fl8
" ..... 0
,,24J
12,Hf
H,'53
2',00'
t7.007
;U.2QO
no
l',UL
1
11.300
1
',GOO
l,~O"
.,'00
2j,~ll
)a,6~f
'.2S0
.!, !O,
p, 03
1·O~-98
lO;l4 ;po
21, O~1
",U4
~12,""7
Il,lOO
j..
'.000
2,$00
H.200
',4!ll
U.J"
l.
""gao
%','33 ,."c"
'.250
n.'1t
_~~._.~ •.....•. ~ •...••••••••• ~ •. _____ ._a. __ a .... ----------------.--..•.... ~ •..•••••.• ----------•••
)O,lH
1.0000 td(:t. CODI':lC1ofS
w ••••••• ····-······--_·······
l.~ZfO W.ll/~~~ Gk%~ ~QO 7QQ 1,00.
~~30S ., ... ~.~. 'O'ILit~ 3.!lQO 1,50Q
.,.0
1.0<4.34 ~L!IN-9"o '0 no
.O$:~ :r:i.nz 1tnt.a,-u.1 ~ '0 JOO
HO
lOfOl 'f9.1.1..\> 'ar"i~" :lH ••• 00 3,7H
l.04U ~l. P&rti~'~ H,'OO 2",500
1
11998 15:04 6123778155 I<~"R PAGE 06
JAL~-06-98 TUE. to~ 18 CARLSON-LAVINE , lNG, r H~I MU. b I i~ I ctJ:;J'lO
10755 tal.p~O:~ ~loe
1Q1.0 ~~ Toi16c ACC813
~&~i~tl~~ P~"b St~d~~~ RQpor~
~Q,n WOod Pi~in~ H611
6H
~
AY.'Or .. "Nt'
I • ULf
1-0""
).0,14 lOJD
"lOT)'.Z.
»/lJwr
'QO
l.n~
._----------_ ... ;-_ ..... ----------_ ........ -----------.......•••. ----------_ ..••..... ---_ ........ -H.175
nOOl 1'1~LlS4
U U Q lI'l.t.c
UloO ~iDkh.
...... ~-------~--~~~-~-------. ~--.-----... -~.-.. ~ ...... --.-.~---..... ~¥----..... -.... ------_ .... --. '
11,265
P&lJ. l
• -
j/1998 15:04 6123778156 K~,1R
,JAN-06-9a TUE' 10: 19 CARLSON-LAVINE, INC. FAX NO, 6128725845
110,111 r •• '-r
aO',t;. X3t6rial
'17.,74 .~~~~r~dtO~
'. iGO ~li=«lt
~2,SSl O~Mr
E~t~ting Plu& *~~dq~d R_pbrt
£d~~ wood ViA~ng Ball
T '.5000011
I
PAGE 07
P.05
1·0~·li'
lOIH .:..::."
.-----
r
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
May 18, 1998
Page 3
Mr. Gertz reported that though four of the HPC members were there, the meeting
was not well attended that evening which eliminated the discussion groups. It was
decided at the meeting that the videotapes would be forwarded to commissions to
view at a regularly scheduled meeting.
Commissioner Peterson-Benike added that the presentation introduced a new
approach to thinking about the City's future.
C. Douglas-More House Question:
Commissioner Case reported a conversation with Earl More's granddaughter and
the trees that were to be taken down. During the conversation, the granddaughter
cried and expressed her frustration with the vines that were cut down from their
house. Commissioner Case wondered if the Commission was aware of the removal
of the vines. Mr. Gertz acknowledged that he knew of it and had recommended
the vines be cut back. He explained that it could be very damaging to the house
-mainly in rotting the ornamental woodwork on the house it was covering.
The trees were also discussed and it was reported that Minnesota Department of
Transportation will be replacing some of the trees and landscaping.
It was also reported that nine windows in the house were broken as a result of the
recent hailstorm.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. Fredrick-Miller Spring:
Mr. Gertz reported that he and Jan Mosman had met approximately two weeks
ago to go over the drawings for the spring. Gertz then took the two comprehensive
drawings to Bob Lambert who agreed with the HPC's original motion to move the
spring Creek-side.
The Commission reviewed the comprehensive drawings and reviewed a few
questions with Gertz and Mosman about items such as: parking spots, kiosks,
benches, and curbing. The Commission commended Mosman for her work.
B. Glenn Lake Children's Camp:
Mr. Gertz made note of the report included in the packet regarding the remodeling
outline for the dining hall at the camp (also called Edenwood Dining Hall). After
reviewing the outline, Mr. Gertz had only a few concerns about the proposition-
namely the new windows. Then, in a conversation with a representative from
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
May 18, 1998
Page 4
discussion with the Commission, Mr. Gertz showed the latest completed drawings of the
camp. Additional items discussed and that he believed the Commission would be
particularly interested in include, but are not limited to the following:
> It was noted that the deck shown on the original building portion would be
eliminated.
> A basement may be built on the far end of the original building, mainly due to
foundation work and the 7 to 8-foot footings that are needed.
> It was suggested to switch the proposed concession room and unisex bathroom.
> Roofing material will be asphalt shingle.
> Doors will be restored or replaced with in-kind doors.
> Heating will be run under the floor.
> Ventilators on the roof will be retained even though they will not be functional.
> Siding will remain original.
> The addition will be distinct but seamless.
> It was requested to change the gable on the addition to a "Hip".
> The interior of the original building will retain its original appearance. A vapor
barrier will be applied.
> The new building will cross over property lines and may have two owners. It is also
a possibility that the property will be "gifted" to the city.
> The desire with landscaping is to maintain it and keep it from looking too structured.
In closing, Mr. Gertz noted that the plans will be going to the DRC this Thursday and
then to the Planning Commission June 8, 1998 for review. He requested the
Commission's input and support on the project to continue to proceed with the plans.
Lori Peterson-Benike moved, seconded by Kristin Kelly, that the Commission
recommend to go forward with the plans for the Glenn Lake Children's Camp and to
support the plan submitted by Friendship Ventures including John Gertz's comments as
discussed in the meeting with the SHPO office.
The Commission recessed at intervals during this conversation due to the thunderstorm.
C. CLG Grant:
Mr. Gertz reported that he and Pat Nunnally went to inspect the Minnesota Valley Trail
segments and found that they lacked integrity and was difficult to discern trail features.
He and Pat Nunnally decided not to pursue these sites at this time.
Jane Hession left the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
D. Riley-Jacques Farmstead:
~I
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
June 15, 1998
Page 3
Mr. Gertz also reported that he spoke with Pat Nunnally regarding National
Registration for the School. Mr. Nunnally was not sure whether it would be eligible,
but suggested to proceed with an application.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. Settler's Ridge:
Mr. Gertz reported that this property has become a very complex issuing that now
includes the involvement of several government agencies. He will be meeting with
the Minnesota Indian Affairs; Dan Herbst, the Developer; John Anfinson from the
Corps of Engineers; a representative from the State Historic Preservations Office;
and Mark Dudsic, State Archaeologist Wednesday to discuss the property further.
Mr. Gertz explained for the Commission that though 20 Indian burial mounds had
been reported on the property, only mounds 12 and 14 possess potential cultural
features. Further excavation will be done on these by the developer and have now
been properly roped off for testing. The habitation site north of the mounds has been
found to be authentic and may be mitigated.
Mr. Gertz will report back.
B. Fredrick-Miller Spring:
Mr. Gertz reported that the drawings for the new spring would be complete soon. He
distributed a brochure with pictures demonstrating how the new concrete tank will
look using a simulated wood cast.
C. Glen Lake children's Camp:
Mr. Gertz reported that Friendship Ventures was unsuccessful in obtaining the
property that the camp crosses as a gift from the railroad. Since this was denied,
Friendship Ventures had submitted an alternate plan, which has also been forwarded
to SHPO for comment.
Mr. Gertz also recapped some of the changes discussed at the last meeting such as
the hip style roof, changes to the concession stand, etc.
Mr. Gertz also reported that he is working on a National Registration for the property
but wants to time it appropriately to avoid any unnecessary obstacles.
There was also discussion regarding the motion made at the last meeting to support
Mr. Gertz's recommendation to proceed with the plans. It was identified that the
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
June 15, 1998
Page 4
motion was not legal since Kristin Kelly is not a voting member of the Commission
and a new motion was made including information discussed at this meeting.
Lori Peterson-Benike moved, seconded by James Wilson, to go forward with the
alternate plans presented June 15, 1998 for the Glen Lake Children's Camp and to
support the plan submitted by Friendship Ventures including John Gertz's comments
as discussed at the May 18, 1998 meeting with the SHPO office.
vu. NEW BUSINESS
A. Programs:
1. Eden Prairie Garden Club Flower Sale:
Commissioner Mosman reported that the Cummins-Grill House was opened
for the Garden Club participants and noted that the house is in nice condition.
She reported that the participants worked extensively on the peony garden
and added that there is much more work to be done. She reported that there
are huge numbers of plants but many will die if not properly taken care of
She requested Mr. Gertz to investigate several items for the garden including:
* Purchasing a mower for the grounds and also supply a gas can.
* Wood chips for around the peonies.
* Peony cages for the plants.
* A small amount of funds to plant blooming perennials for Sunbonnet
days in September.
In closing, Commissioner Mosman noted that the garden club would return to
the property July 21 to continue work on the garden.
B. Eden Prairie Magical History Tour II:
Mr. Gertz reported that the first History Tour was so popular that it was decided to
have another one this year. The History Tours will be July 21 and July 28. Sandy
Werts, from the Parks and Recreation department is organizing the event.
C. Sunbonnet Day:
Mr. Gertz reported that the Commission would be somewhat involved in planning
this event which is scheduled for September 20, 1998.
B. ReconstructionlRehabilitation Cost Estimates for the Riley-Jacques House and
Smith-Douglas-More House:
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 8,1998
Page 8
B. CAMP EDENWOOD by Friendship Ventures. Request for Planned Unit
Development Concept Review on 52.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District
Review with waivers on 2 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Public
District on 2 acres and Site Plan Review on 2 acres for construction of a new dining
hall addition. Location 6350 Indian Chief road.
Kipp reviewed the background of this project when a 15,000 sq. ft. building was
approved and included demolition of the existing building. Friendship Ventures could
not construct that building due to funding shortfalls and have returned to have a new
small building approved which saves the existing dining hall. The existing structure
has been found eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Kipp reviewed
the Staff Report and indicated since the report was written, Friendship Ventures has
been told by the railroad company that they will not be selling them any right of way
as shown on the plans. An alternate plan is attached which shifts the building out of
the railroad right of way. Kipp stated staff is comfortable with this shift and
recommends that the Planning Commission approve the plans to incorporate the
building shift and forward it on to the City Council.
Ed Stracke, President of Friendship Ventures, stated they were present to answer
questions. He noted they were comfortable with the staff recommendations as
proposed.
Dom asked about the waiver for the use of wood on the exterior of the addition, and
whether it would blend in with the existing building. Stracke responded that it would
be finished to match the historic structure as closely as possible. Alexander stated she
supported the project; Clinton and Foote concurred.
The Public Hearing was opened.
No one present wished to speak.
MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the Public Hearing. Motion
carried 6-0.
MOTION: Lewis moved, seconded by Clinton to recommend to the City Council
approval ofthe request of Friendship Ventures for Planed Unit Development concept
Review on 52.4 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on
2 acres, Zoning District Amendment within the Public District on 2 acres and Site
Plan Review on 2 acres based on plans dated June 5, 1998 and subject to the
recommendations of the Staff Report dated June 5, 1998. Motion carried 6-0.
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL
RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES
June 15, 1998
Page 2
deducted from an insurance claim in the event of damage or destruction to the property, and the staff
recommendation that the trail should go through the property. Brown asked about Friendship
Ventures participating in the cost of the water and sewer installation and Lambert responded that it
would not have to be paid all at one time, but could be phased in over a period of years.
Ed Stracke, Friendship Ventures, noted they disagreed with Staff's position regarding the language
issue, and they did find it offensive. They agree with the thirty year extension on the lease.
Regarding the fonnula for depreciation they wanted to be sure that any insurance payments made on
buildings they construct after the lease is approved would be recouped in the event of destruction or
loss of property, and in the event they might decide not to rebuild the money would return to
Friendship Ventures and not go to the City.
Stolar asked if this was the first instance where the City chose not to update the contract language
and Lambert responded this was an issue where the City Attorney felt that consistency should be
maintained with the originally worded document. Discussion ensued regarding the issue of the
insurance premiums and the recompense that would come out of that ifbuildings were destroyed.
Stracke stated they want to be sure that they don't pay insurance premiums on this and end up
without recompense ifbuildings were lost or damaged. Brown stated if any improvements are made
to the Senior Center building they become City property as soon as they are made. He felt that this
was a similar case and should be treated in the same manner.
Koenig asked if staff wanted them to make preserving the buildings a condition of the lease and
Lambert responded this was a separate issue but they could make a recommendation to the City
Council if they felt that strongly about it. He would prefer to see it handled separately. Koenig asked
about the trail and the issue of constructing a fence. Stracke stated they would take some steps to
protect their clients in some manner but it was not something that could be insurmountable. They
would work with staff to resolve this issue. Discussion ensued regarding the issue of the wording in
the lease agreement and some way to resolve this. Stolar commented they could make a
recommendation to the City Council that the language be changed because they would listen to both
their recommendation and that of the City Attorney and make their own decision.
MOTION:Stolar moved, seconded by Koenig, to recommend to the City Council that they approve
Sections 1, 3, 13, and 20 as per the staff recommendation and they concur with the Friendship
Ventures request that the language be changed to less offensive language. Motion carried 7-0.
v. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
A. Camp Edenwood
Fox reviewed the staff report for the expansion to Camp Edenwood and noted that staff
recommended approval of the project based on the 6/5/98 Planning Commission staff report and the
supplemental staff report.
Stracke reviewed the project and the revised plan which does not cross the railroad property line and
thus requires waivers. They have reduced the size ofthe addition and will use existing space as much
PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL
RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES
June 15, 1998
Page 3
as possible. They were concerned about the amount of tree replacement materials the City was
requiring. They are having a difficult time replacing all the trees and ask they be allowed to replace
only those trees that would have been lost with the original plan. Fox stated this plan calls for
replacement of 30 trees and the old plan called for replacement of 24 trees. Discussion ensued
regarding the numbers of trees that would be lost and their locations.
Fox reviewed the tree loss ordinance requirements and the basis for the original tree loss figures
which were based on the larger building which was originally proposed. Since this has changed, the
number of trees that will be lost and need to be replaced has been lowered to 45 caliper inches to
mitigate the 86 caliper inches which will be lost.
Fox reviewed the drainage plan and he noted that the City Engineer has recommended that a full size
NURP pond not be constructed in this area, but rather they should utilize a shallow ponding area
which presently exists on the site to slow the process of water runoff from the site.
Brown inquired if Friendship Ventures was expecting significant growth in clientele and Stracke
responded that the summer was their busiest time but there would be some growth occurring over
time. They do not anticipate expanding their programs further. Brown asked why they were putting
in such a large parking area and Lambert responded it was required by City Ordinance. Fox noted
that the final tree loss mitigation figures will be calculated after· the project has been approved by the
City Council.
Corneille commented he was not sure that the trees proposed as the replacement trees were the same
quality as those that were being lost due to the construction. Stracke stated they will be replacing
as many trees as they can without using up program space because they want the trees to be in the
same areas as they are now as much as is possible. Discussion ensued regarding paving the parking
lot and the Commission felt that it should not be paved. The numbers of parking spaces were also
discussed and the way these figures are determined. If there will be other uses on the site, staff felt
41 spaces would be adequate to accommodate the parking need.
MOTION: Wilson moved, seconded by Comeille, to recommend to the City Council approval of the
request by Friendship Ventures for Camp Edenwood based on the Planning Commission staff report
dated June 5, 1998 and the supplemental staff report dated June 10, 1998. Motion carried 7-0.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. Appointment to the Housin2. Transportation. and Human Services Board
Koenig stated she has served on this Board for the past few years and felt it would take a new
member some time to become familiar with the various agencies they dealt with. Brown suggested
perhaps she would consider continuing to serve as the representative throughout the summer and they
could revisit this item again in September to consider finding a replacement at that time. Koenig
agreed to continue to serve until the fall.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chris Enger, Assistant City Manager
DATE: July 1, 1998
SUBJECT: CAMP EDENWOOD
City staff met with Mr. Ed Stracke of Friendship Ventures on June 25, 1998 to discuss cost
comparisons for rehabilitating the existing dining hall versus new construction. Discussion
regarding costs did not take place. Instead, Mr. Stracke notified City staff that Friendship
Ventures had decided to abandon plans to remodel the dining hall and dormitory. They will
continue to use the existing buildings and would cooperate in remodeling the buildings if the City
receives grants for that purpose.
Mr. Stracke further indicated that Friendship Ventures would now like to construct a 4,000-
5,000 square foot free-standing dining hall located approximately in the center of the camp and a
1,800 square foot maintenance/storage building located near the camp entrance. He informed
City staff this was necessary because they were not able to raise funds for the larger building they
had originally planned.
Friendship Ventures proposed change is beneficial to the existing camp, e.g., less tree loss, no
impact to the historical setting, less cost for building rehabilitation (this is an assumption based on
continued seasonal use versus upgrading to year round use).
To continue forward, the Council will need to know from Friendship Ventures the following:
• Willingness to match all grants the City receives for camp rehabilitation
• Reuse plans for dining hall and donnitory
• Seasonal or year-round use
• Public use/access
In addition to these fundamental questions, the Council may also want to know if Friendship
Ventures is working with a Master Plan, or similar document to guide overall camp planning.
Such a plan would assist greatly in decisions on development, operation and preservation of the
area.
DATE: 07/07/98
EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO: .V·,: -I
SECTION: Public Hearing .
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Vacation 98-04
Engineering Division Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements in Lots 23 and 24, Block 5, Bearpath
David Olson Second Addition Published June 11, 1998
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following action:
1. Close the public hearing
2. Adopt the resolution vacating the drainage and utility easements located in Lots
23 and 24, Block 5, Bearpath Second Addition
Overview:
The property owner has requested the vacation of the underlying drainage and utility easements
within the referenced lots to enable the combination and replatting of the property. The
applicant has purchased both lots, intends to construct an addition to the existing single family
home (located on Lot 23) which will extend in to Lot 24 and replat the two lots into one. The
replat will include the dedication of replacement drainage and utility easements.
Supporting Information:
Vacation drawings
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
IN PART OF
BEARPATH SECOND ADDmON
(VAC 98-04)
WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has certain drainage and utility easements described as follows:
All drainage and utility easements as platted within Lots 23 and 24, Block 5 Bearpath Second
Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July, 7. 1998 after due notice was given to affected property
owners and published in accordance with M.S.A. 412.851;
WHEREAS, is has been determined that the said drainage and utility easements are not necessary and
have no interest to the public, therefore should be vacated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows:
1. Said drainage and utility easements as above described are hereby vacated.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare a notice of completion of proceedings in accordance with
M.S.A. 412.851.
ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on July 7, 1998.
ATIEST:
Donald R. Uram, City Clerk
Jean L. Harris, Mayor
SEAL
I
I
i
\,
d
-I
fi
1)
IS)
()1
RUED ADDITION
\ \ _. \ I
\
\..1 'p , I ~\ \ ~
1 l.,)~o " c§' I ~c.~! '-.' .9 I I J~) ,~ •
i-; \l) /.., \ I '{.... -:.~(. .~' ~/.
P. L S 83"H·J~· £-•• ___ -"'--" /' i 'I~S\:~~-~-2§4~.12~r ~;;~~~:'::':~_~r - -J
\ :or-a.~ -----
N
~ g, :---------------... ~ -----
, J,{ ~
" ~ . .J
........ \-
\
\
\
\
I
I
<...
"
\
\
\
I
I
I
" "
)
" "
1 ---BLOCK
lJ9.~e S 15.1'44'3$' r
-
--
I
J
'r-
I'.:
.( o. ~
bS
III
-.. 4. o r= is
(J
.(
_m-. ......... --_ .. ______ 4\*1. lUI flo'''' _..,.....IIIto_.."
-."'1_.
1I["""'l~ 9tG¥tf IoIIf. ,I,9WU(1I.
• I)[lUlIU'RCH .,CJRII,I(MI fOJ~O "~D WoVlI<tO
a~ UCUI$ MO. 11110.
.JIIl'7._ ....... ~-
~----~----------
CI>Il'CIT __ ... -,,-
. .,..'" ~r:: ~~~ ~~~ ~~.t:.t~.: u.."'.me. L~
.., .. _ ..... ......,-
IIF _____ -----· ..... ,
_ ......... _ .. ____ .. Ibo.--... t----.............. _"'''' ...... ,..-,.. ...... _--_ .. __ .. -
_ .. \0 ... .--_--1>00--.... --.. -.. -......
""".-
tooMot_
0ftU,~ ________ _
=~.,"tio~:t!:':1C..:::'b="-:"""''''-''"J'' ---------
1iOWi~·--.. ------
117 &aaiiOiiOOj ....m ~ -:-=
.-.. -.... 11 .. -----
=~~.t"'"'~~=-~~lOa-\.tiif."'.." of ----•• -.
"' ____ . _______ .... 100,...
IIJI ____________ • l1li_.
" .. "..-----~~";:'..rt::' to ~-,....,..,. ~;o:.~"" 11<_ . .-.. -....... --
""------.-
i
lSI
I'.:' I
I-"
\.0
\,[.
OJ
I-"
.P-
.P-
-.J
'-I
D
3: m
IS'
I ,. ,.
z
(')
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
SECTION: Consent Calendar 07/07/98
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO.
Finance Payment of Claims VI.
Checks 64058 to 64651
Action/Direction:
Approve Payment of Claims
/
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY
DIVISION
LEGISLATIVE
LEGAL COUNSEL
GENERAL SERVICES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
DATA PROCESSING
FINANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
INFORMATION
ELECTIONS
HUMAN SERV
ENGINEERING
INSPECTIONS
FACILITIES
ASSESSING
CIVIL DEFENSE
POLICE
FIRE
ANIMAL CONTROL
STREETS/TRAFFIC
PARK MAINTENANCE
PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY
STREET LIGHTING
FLEET SERVICES
ORGANIZED ATHLETICS
COMMUNITY DEV
COMMUNITY CENTER
BEACHES
HISTORICAL
YOUTH RECREATION
SPECIAL EVENTS
ADULT RECREATION
RECREATION ADMIN
ADAPTIVE REC
OAK POINT POOL
ARTS
PARK FACILITIES
PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ
EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
CITY CENTER
SW METRO TRANSIT
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE
PRAIRIEVIEW
CUB FOODS
WATER DEPT
SEWER DEPT
STORM DRAINAGE
AGENCY FUNDS
EQUIPMENT
24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
TOTAL
$5,758.60
$9,780.92
$15,234.12
$572.75
$26,235.20
$1,994.85
$697.07
$8,004.57
$4,752.00
$1,500.00
$162.83
$528.75
$13,614.03
$367.94
$50.24
$21,706.41
$2,117.06
$79.90
$20,575.32
$14,526.31
$16.04
$49,106.09
$12,388.98
$4,421. 40
$1,316.89
$32,697.83
$2,257.45
$159.75
$11,751.26
$248.95
$2,591.14
$57.66
$306.90
$2,437.95
$5,679.70
$3,237.98
$108,327.57
$5,056.44
$909.34
$35.33
$11,578.56
$86,588.00
$95,491. 45
$173,136.51
$126,934.56
$6,197.23
$6,902.79
$2,000.00
$4,915.89
$905,008.51*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64058
64059
64060
64061
64062
64063
64064
64065
64066
64067
64068
64069
64070
64071
64072
64073
64074
64075
64076
64077
64078
64082
64083
64084
64085
64086
64087
64088
64089
64090
64091
64092
64093
64094
64095
64096
64097
64098
64099
64100
64101
64102
64103
64104
64107
64108
64109
64110
64113
64114
64115
64116
64117
64118
64119
$81.00
$2,157.93
$7,962.03
$1,725.08
$30.00
$165.18
$29.00
$29.00
$116.00
$58.00
$308.84
$29.00
$18.00
$5.00
$29.00
$58.00
$29.00
$29.00
$5.00
$100.00
$2,239.76
$29.00
$15.00
$29.00
$5.00
$25.00
$5.00
$67.38
$58.00
$1,750.00
$44.73
$29.00
$89.00
$2.00
$30.00
$100.66
$66.00
$200.00
$84.00
$30.87
$5.00
$58.00
$42.00
$69,854.55
$2.00
$96.00
$1,363.20
$420.37
$100.00
$58.00
$5.00
$29.00
$30.00
$48.00
$5.00
VENDOR
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
ANDERSON, THOMAS
ARMOR SECURITY INC
BEAUCHAMP, NIKKI
BERTELSON, ANN
BLACKFORD, KATHY
COPPLE, DAVE
CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE
DEVRIES, TRICIA
DIGRE, DANIEL
DOWNEY, KEVIN
EIDE, JANE
ELLIS, KIM KIEHNA
ENFIELD, KELLI
EVANS, BETSY
FOSTER, BILL
FRATZKE, SANDRA
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
GILLIAM, CINDY
GORSKI, SUSAN
GRIZZELL, DEBORAH
HAMMER, MARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
HOST, JIM
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS*
JACOBSON, ANNE
JAL ARCHITECTS LTD
JANEX INC
JOHNSON, RITA
KOLLA, SUMA
LOWE, RACHEL
MCCULLUM, CRAIG
MCGLYNN BAKERIES
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURA
MINNIS, JEANNE
MOLZAHN, EVELYN
MONROE, LORI
MOSSER, NAJMA
MURPHY, DENISE
NIELSON, JODY
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
OSTENDORF, LISA
PATTERSON, NANCY
PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS
ROSENTRETER, JOAN
SAMUELSON, MARYA
SWANSON, CHUCK
TAYLOR, PENNY
THANNERT, MICHELLE
TOWNSEND, SUSAN
USHER, DAVID
24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
DESCRIPTION
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LESSONS/CLASSES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
FACILITIES RENTAL
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
FACILITIES RENTAL
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
FACILITIES RENTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FACILITIES RENTAL
RENTALS
LESSONS/CLASSES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
OPEN FEES
MISCELLANEOUS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
FACILITIES RENTAL
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
ELECTRIC
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
LESSONS/CLASSES
FACILITIES RENTAL
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
FACILITIES RENTAL
PROGRAM
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
GENERAL
ICE ARENA
OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE
OAK POINT LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
FIRE
POOL LESSONS
ICE ARENA
RACQUETBALL
OAK POINT LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
RACQUETBALL
ADULT PROGRAM
ICE ARENA
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
RACQUETBALL
POLICE
RACQUETBALL
FIRE
OAK POINT LESSONS
STARING LAKE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
OAK POINT OPERATIONS
POLICE
PARK MAINTENANCE
ADULT PROGRAM
ICE ARENA
POOL LESSONS
RACQUETBALL
OAK POINT LESSONS
ICE ARENA
STORMWATER LIFTSTATION
POOL LESSONS
ICE ARENA
STORM DRAINAGE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ADULT PROGRAM
OAK POINT LESSONS
RACQUETBALL
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
ICE ARENA
RACQUETBALL
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64120
64121
64122
64123
64124
64126
64127
64128
64130
64132
64133
64134
64135
64136
64137
64138
64139
64140
64141
64142
64143
64144
64145
64146
64147
64148
64149
64150
64151
64152
64153
64154
64155
64156
64157
64158
64159
64160
64161
64162
64163
64164
64165
64166
64167
64168
64169
64170
64171
64172
64174
64176
64177
64178
64179
$29.00
$8.00
$16.00
$696.60
$2,922.15
$15,674.40
$243.50
$9,510.92
$10,164.21
$2,671.18
$571.63
$90.00
$30.00
$40.00
$28.00
$20.00
$45.00
$5.00
$20.00
$8.00
$16.00
$5.00
$20.33
$44.00
$62.25
$32.00
$50.00
$300.00
$44.00
$52.00
$54.00
$76.00
$50.00
$55.78
$78.00
$5,121.65
$4,924.93
$96.25
$3,665.40
$100.00
$17.00
$8.00
$200.00
$200.00
$42.00
$52.00
$20.00
$60.83
$44.67
$1. 00
$7,489.08
$250.00
$385.00
$50.23
$137.25
VENDOR
WEBER, MARK
WELLS, EVELYNN
WELLS, MARTHA
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
VINTAGE ONE WINES INC
ANDERSON, LYDIA
ANDREWS, NANCY
BEAUCHAMP, NIKKI
BHOW, ABHA
BULLOCK, MARY
CHRISTIANSON, JULIE
DES LAURIERS, DIONE
FREEMAN, BARB
GASNER, KRIS
HALLS, CINDY
HEYMAN, JODI
KOLLA, SUMA
LAWN KING INC
MAJERUS, BARBARA
NOYES, ELLEN
PETTY CASH
QUINLAN, KIM
SAMUELSON, JEFF
SAMUELSON, MARYA
TURNER, MARCIA
VACK, JEAN
VORTE, AMANDA
WITTIG, JANINE
DAY DISTRIBUTING
MARK VII
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
BANN, STANLEY
CAMP, MARIE
FARAHNI, DAVID
GABBERTS
GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL OF GREATER
GOSHERT, ANNE
HANSEN, KATHY
HOHERTZ, JEFFREY
HUSKEY, ADAM
JOHNSON, ANNE
MCNAB, NANCY
MINNEGASCO
MINNESOTA, UNIVERSITY OF
OTTERNESS, RONALD
RAMBOW INC
RENEWAL BY ANDERSON
24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
DESCRIPTION
LESSONS/CLASSES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
WINE IMPORTED
SCHOOLS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
BUILDING PERMIT
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
PETTY CASH AND CHANGE FUND
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
BEER 6/12
BEER 6/12
MISC TAXABLE
BEER 6/12
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ROUND LAKE PAVILION
FACILITIES RENTAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
PRINTING
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
GAS
CONFERENCE
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
BUILDING PERMIT
PROGRAM
OAK POINT LESSONS
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
FITNESS CLASSES
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
YOUTH TENNIS
YOUTH ATHLETICS
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
FD 10 ORG
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
FD 10 ORG
PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
YOUTH TENNIS
AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
POOL LESSONS
ACTIVITY CAMP
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
ARTS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
PARK FACILITIES
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OAK POINT LESSONS
ICE SHOW
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
IN SERVICE TRAINING
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
RILEY LAKE-BEACH
FD 10 ORG
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64180
64181
64182
64183
64184
64185
64186
64189
64190
64191
64193
64195
64196
64197
64198
64199
64200
64202
64203
64204
64205
64206
64208
64209
64211
64212
64213
64214
64215
64216
64217
64219
64220
64221
64222
64223
64224
64225
64226
64227
64228
64229
64230
64231
64232
64233
64234
64235
64236
64237
64238
64239
64240
64241
64242
$40.00
$250.00
$110.00
$40.00
$40.00
$5.00
$465.00
$280.00
$364.41
$5,696.63
$1,348.96
$148.62
$2,426.40
$70.11
$8,119.65
$243.00
$1,807.51
$1,396.54
$1,152.65
$462.95
$64.90
$704.45
$160.84
$3,065.94
$162.00
$9,500.20
$918.00
$490.00
$100.00
$100.00
$1,204.32
$481. 64
$40.00
$100.00
$15.00
$10.00
$20.00
$48.37
$25.00
$15.00
$29.00
$415.00
$76.13
$7.01
$58.00
$42.00
$15.00
$29.00
$295.00
$49.98
$138.34
$73.58
$26.00
$58.00
$15.00
VENDOR
ROWSE, DIANE
RUSH, GREG
SCHWEITZER, PAM
SHERMAN, MICHAEL & COURTNEY
SNYDER, BRAD
STROTHER, WILLIAM
TEKIELA, STAN
VERNSTRUM, STEVE
MENARDS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
BELLBOY CORPORATION
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
DAY DISTRIBUTING
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRAND PERE WINES INC
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
MARK VII
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
SALUD AMERICA INC
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
VINTAGE ONE WINES INC
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BANK
GOOD NEWS BIG BAND
KRAEMERS HARDWARE INC
MERLINS ACE HARDWARE
STARK, EMMETT
VALLEY JAZZ BIG BAND
BARTOLETTI, SUSAN
BLOMBERG, KIM
CAMP, PHILLIP
CLYDESDALE, WENDY
DAVIES, ANNE
DERR, SALLY
GOLDAMER, JAYNE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS
GRIFFITH, BRENT
GULBERG, NANCY
GUSA, KRISTIE
KACHER, PAULINE
KIM, JEAN
KNUDSEN, MARILYN
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
MANNING, ELIZABETH
MANUFACTURING SERVICES INC
MARK OF EXCELLENCE
MOHAN, MARK
NELSON, SALLY
NOLTING, MARIE
24-JUN-1998 (08 :36)
DESCRIPTION
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
TOBACCO PRODUCTS
BEER 6/12
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
MISC TAXABLE
MISC TAXABLE
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
SMALL TOOLS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
AWARDS
TRAVEL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
CONFERENCE
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
OTHER EQUIPMENT
DEPOSITS
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
POOL SPECIAL EVENTS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
FIRE STATION #2
SEWER LIFTSTATION
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
ARTS
ARTS
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
ARTS
ARTS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OAK POINT LESSONS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
POOL LESSONS
FINANCE DEPT
POLICE
10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION
OAK POINT LESSONS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OAK POINT LESSONS
COUNCIL
POLICE
POLICE
ESCROW
OAK POINT LESSONS
POOL LESSONS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
---------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64243
64244
64245
64246
64247
64248
64249
64250
64251
64252
64253
64254
64255
64256
64257
64258
64260
64262
64263
64264
64265
64266
64267
64268
64269
64270
64271
64272
64273
64274
64275
64276
64277
64278
64279
64280
64281
64282
64283
64284
64285
64286
64287
64288
64289
64290
64291
64292
64293
64294
64295
64297
64298
64300
64301
$10.07
$1,400.00
$5.00
$92.32
$240.00
$15.00
$10.00
$284.66
$29.00
$15.00
$263.59
$45.00
$14.00
$9,696.73
$281.70
$1,808.04
$8,728.91
$70.00
$56.00
$28.00
$50.00
$4.00
$296.19
$28.00
$28.00
$40.00
$24.00
$28.00
$28.00
$44.00
$28.00
$5.00
$42.00
$28.00
$11. 00
$30.00
$93.94
$28.00
$21. 00
$21. 00
$12.00
$28.00
$5.00
$28.00
$29.00
$2,297.00
$928.30
$534.99
$27,652.15
$11,828.65
$5,639.19
$2,924.14
$3,983.55
$140.00
$160.00
VENDOR
OLSON, MARY
ORRIN THOMPSON
PARKER, DEANN
RYAN COMPANIES
S.O.T.A.
SCHULTZ, HERBERT
SHEEHAN, THERESA
SHEEHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN
SNYDER, ROXANNE
TRITZ, LORI
TWIN CITY VACUUM
VEGA, PAULA
WILSON, JOHN
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
BANGASSER, PATTI
BILSE, MELINDA
BOYLE, STEPHANIE
CHEESMAN, SARAH
GAIDA, RAE
GIBRALTAR TITLE
GRODNICK, COLE
HALLS, CINDY
HAYEN, LINDA
HEMPHILL, KATHY
JACOBS, NANCY
KRAMP, KERRY
LARABEE, ELAINE
LEENAY, STEVE
LUSKIN, BARBARA
MCLEAN, DAVID
MENZHUBER, ROBYN
MIELKE, BETTY
MILLER, LAURIE
PELTIER, TIMOTHY
RIEDER, LUANN
ROBLE, LINDA
SCHWITZER, LARIE
SPENCE, FRAN
STONEFIELD, SUSAN
TANGHE, MARY
WEEGMANN, STACEY
WILLIAMS, LANA
RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPA
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
CIRCUS PIZZA
DENI SOVA , ALEKSANDRA
24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
DESCRIPTION
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CASH OVER/ SHORT
LESSONS/CLASSES
DEPOSITS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
DEPOSITS
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
CLEANING SUPPLIES
LESSONS/CLASSES
RESERVE EQUIPMENT
TRANSPORTATION
MISC TAXABLE
DISCOUNTS
TRANSPORTATION
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SPECIAL COMMUNITY EVENTS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
DISABILITY IN EMPLOYERS
BEER 6/12
WINE DOMESTIC
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
WINE DOMESTIC
DISCOUNTS
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
LESSONS/CLASSES
PROGRAM
10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION
FD 10 ORG
POOL LESSONS
ESCROW
POLICE
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
ESCROW
OAK POINT LESSONS
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
FIRE STATION #3
ICE ARENA
POLICE
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
AFTERNOON ADVENTURE
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
WATER DEPT
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
YOUTH TENNIS
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
YOUTH TENNIS
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SUMMER SAFETY CAMP
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
YOUTH TENNIS
YOUTH TENNIS
DAY CAMP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
ADULT PROGRAM
FD 10 ORG
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
POOL LESSONS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64302
64303
64304
64305
64306
64307
64308
64309
64310
64311
64312
64313
64314
64316
64317
64318
64319
64321
64322
64323
64324
64325
64326
64327
64328
64329
64330
64331
64332
64333
64335
64336
64337
64338
64339
64340
64341
64342
64343
64344
64345
64346
64347
64348
64349
64350
64351
64352
64354
64355
64356
64357
64359
64360
64361
$350.00
$40.20
$36.00
$29.00
$22.37
$97.13
$507.88
$1,000.00
$1,540.00
$443.10
$6,502.06
$157.15
$286.02
$162.61
$7,895.65
$639.82
$1,773.12
$2,631.35
$6,001. 60
$179.50
$1,797.86
$352.18
$2,417.93
$278.65
$563.46
$33.17
$763.74
$3,763.50
$102.50
$15,575.56
$6,012.58
$2,366.37
$2,054.00
$2,715.16
$5,607.67
$4,458.63
$11,227.96
$70.05
$45.00
$2,081. 04
$385.53
$3,668.60
$701. 84
$5,965.80
$373.66
$2,027.85
$14,466.49
$3,135.12
$3,889.10
$186.10
$83.10
$6,357.65
$363.11
$1,895.05
$1,371.25
VENDOR
DIAMOND T RANCH
FEINBERG, CAROLYN
GREEN, CHERYL
JOHNSON, SHARON
LENZ, NANCY
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
RAINBOW FOODS -CHARGES
TEMPORARY HEROS
DAY DISTRIBUTING
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
MARK VII
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
WINE COMPANY, THE
BELLBOY CORPORATION
DAY DISTRIBUTING
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRAND PERE WINES INC
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
MARK VII
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
24-JUN-1998 (08 :36)
DESCRIPTION
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
LESSONS/CLASSES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
BEER 6/12
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
BEER 6/12
MISC TAXABLE
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
BEER 6/12
DISCOUNTS
MISC NON-TAXABLE
BEER 6/12
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
MISC TAXABLE
WINE IMPORTED
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
BEER 6/12
BEER 6/12
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO DISCOUNTS
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
MARK VII
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
BELLBOY CORPORATION
DAY DISTRIBUTING
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
MARK VII
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
PEPSI COLA COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
WORLD CLASS WINES INC
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
BEER 6/12
MISC TAXABLE
TOBACCO PRODUCTS
TRANSPORTATION
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
BEER 6/12
TOBACCO PRODUCTS
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
MISC TAXABLE
MISC TAXABLE
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
7
PROGRAM
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
ICE ARENA
POOL LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
OAK POINT LESSONS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
ARTS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE V~W LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE JILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64362
64363
64364
64365
64366
64368
64369
64370
64371
64372
64373
64374
64376
64377
64378
64380
64381
64382
64383
64384
64385
64386
64387
64388
64389
64390
64391
64392
64393
64394
64395
64396
64397
64398
64399
64400
64401
64402
64403
64404
64405
64406
64407
64408
64409
64410
64411
64412
64413
64414
64415
64416
64417
64418
64419
$1,432.40
$2,701. 85
$202.05
$1,355.86
$2,147.55
$2,700.40
$868.30
$2,420.45
$4,925.41
$262.00
$9,147.55
$4,942.92
$662.60
$1,548.45
$4,334.51
$16.90
$42.83
$276.37
$214.12
$811.49
$29.00
$58.00
$328.20
$350.00
$48.00
$6.00
$300.00
$600.00
$16.00
$225.00
$28.00
$70.00
$911.83
$28.00
$28.00
$28.00
$500.00
$28.00
$10.00
$678.60
$33.00
$200.45
$150.00
$321. 09
$56.00
$16.25
$39.71
$765.60
$14.94
$200.00
$28.00
$40.00
$200.00
$33.00
$218.76
VENDOR
DAY DISTRIBUTING
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM
PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
EAGLE WINE COMPANY
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO
PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO
ABEL, KRISTIN
ANDERSON, GWEN
AT&T
CARLTON CO HUMAN SERVICES CTR
CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
CHATLEAIN, JULIE
CHRISTIANS, ANGELA
CRAWFORD, ANN
DUHRKOPF, CLARK
ERICSON, CYNTHIA
FLESNER-CZECH, DENELLE
FRETHEM, CRAIG
24-JUN-1998 (08: 36)
DESCRIPTION
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
MISC TAXABLE
DISCOUNTS
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
BEER 6/12
TRANSPORTATION
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
TRANSPORTATION
DISCOUNTS
MILEAGE AND PARKING
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
TELEPHONE
GARNISHMENT WITHHELD
GARNISHMENT WITHHELD
SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES
LESSONS/CLASSES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
FRETHEM, DEB OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
GFOA TRAINING SUPPLIES
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS AWARDS
HEDEMARK-HASS, SUSAN
HEMKEN, TIM
HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND
HUDERLE, BETH
JACOBS, NANCY
JORDAN, LAURA
KACHER, PAULINE
KNECHT, MARY
KRAUSERT, SHEILA
LANZI, BOB
LEU, KAREN
MCGLYNN BAKERIES
MEIER, ELLEN
MENARDS
MUELLER, GAIL
PAPER WAREHOUSE
PILGRIM, BECKY
PRO-CUT FLOORING
RAINBOW FOODS -CHARGES
RATEIKE, MARILYN JANE
ROMMEL, LINDA
SELVOG, TAMARA
SEVERSON, JON
THOMPSON, MARGARET
US POSTMASTER -HOPKINS
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
GARNISHMENT WITHHELD
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
MILEAGE AND PARKING
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
LESSONS/CLASSES
POSTAGE
PROGRAM
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
GENERAL
FD 10 ORG
FD 10 ORG
ADULT PROGRAM
OAK POINT LESSONS
SUMMER THEATRE
SUMMER THEATRE
ARTS CAMP
FITNESS CLASSES
SUMMER THEATRE
SUMMER THEATRE
FINANCE DEPT
FINANCE DEPT
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
FD 10 ORG
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER THEATRE
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
POOL LESSONS
ATHLETIC COORDINATOR
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SUMMER THEATRE
FIRE STATION #2
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
POOL OPERATIONS
1996 REHABILITATION
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SUMMER THEATRE
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
SUMMER THEATRE
POOL LESSONS
ADULT PROGRAM
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64420
64421
64422
64423
64424
64425
64426
64427
64428
64429
64430
64431
64434
64435
64436
64437
64438
64439
64440
64441
64442
64443
64444
64445
64446
64447
64448
64449
64450
64451
64452
64453
64454
64455
64456
64457
64458
64459
64460
64461
64462
64463
64464
64465
64466
64467
64468
64469
64470
64471
64472
64473
64474
64475
64476
$8,000.00
$2,935.84
$100.00
$17.00
$50.00
$42.83
$300.00
$40.00
$680.00
$25.51
$40.00
$29,315.42
$29.00
$55.00
$406.60
$23.00
$126.63
$2,383.25
$438.98
$205.45
$998.44
$251. 05
$1,080.00
$439.76
$254.54
$405.64
$606.75
$40.75
$113.88
$1,477.97
$240.00
$2,474.89
$49.11
$18,487.70
$1,840.00
$259.00
$185.64
$200.00
$957.00
$79.00
$75.00
$86.27
$310.00
$4,924.06
$237.50
$738.71
$671.48
$130.00
$4,605.22
$21.12
$1,125.00
$319.44
$3,237.76
$9,810.26
$480.00
VENDOR
US POSTMASTER
US POSTMASTER
WELLS, DANIEL
ADIE PEGGY
BERRYMAN, NANCY
BOSECK, LAURIE
DISBROW, DEDE
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY BANK
ERICKSON, RICHARD
MENARDS
MEYER, DEBBIE
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
SARHAD, ROHINI
STERN, NANCIE
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
ACTIVE RUBBER STAMP
ALL AMERICAN AQUATICS
ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY
AQUA CITY PLUMBING AND HEATING
AQUA ENGINEERING INC
AQUA LOGIC INC
ASPEN REACH EQUIPMENT COMPANY
AVR INC
BACONS ELECTRIC COMPANY
BAN-KOE SYSTEMS INC
BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY
BCA/TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC
BILCO COMPANY, THE
BLACK & VEATCH
BOLLIG & SONS INC
BRION, ED
BRO-TEX INC
BROWN, PAUL
BUCK, NATHAN
BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS
CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT
CASCADE CONSULTING ASSOCIATES
CEMSTONE
CHAD NESTOR ILLUSTRATION & DES
CHANHASSEN LAWN AND SPORTS
CLEAN SWEEP INC
CODE ADMINISTRATION & INSPECTI
COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOC
CORNER MARKING CO
CORNERSTONE
CORPORATE GRAPHICS COMMERCIAL
CRS CONSULTING & ENGINEERING I
CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY
D J'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC
24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
POSTAGE
POSTAGE
DESCRIPTION
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
FACILITIES RENTAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
ELECTRIC
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
TELEPHONE
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PRINTING
CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CHEMICALS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
SCHOOLS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
ADVERTISING
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SWEEPING
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
PRINTING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PRINTING
COMPUTERS
CHEMICALS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
GENERAL
GENERAL
PROGRAM
SUMMER THEATRE
POOL LESSONS
AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
ICE ARENA
ARTS
ARTS
PARK MAINTENANCE
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
STORMWATER LIFTSTATION
OAK POINT LESSONS
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
GENERAL
STREET MAINTENANCE
POLICE
ROUND LAKE-BEACH
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
POLICE
POOL LESSONS
WATER WELL #6
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
POOL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
STORM DRAINAGE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE
ICE ARENA
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION
WATER WELL #7
SOFTBALL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PARK FACILITIES
SOFTBALL
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
POLICE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
INSPECTION-ADMIN
STORM DRAINAGE
JULY 4TH CELEBRATION
TREE REMOVAL
STREET MAINTENANCE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
COMMUNITY SERVICES
POLICE
COMMUNITY SERVICES
ASSESSING-ADMIN
POLICE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64477
64478
64479
64480
64481
64482
64483
64484
64485
64486
64487
64488
64489
64490
64491
64492
64493
64494
64495
64496
64497
64498
64499
64500
64501
64502
64503
64504
64505
64506
64507
64508
64509
64510
64511
64512
64513
64514
64515
64516
64517
64518
64519
64520
64521
64522
64523
64524
64525
64526
64527
64528
64529
64530
64531
$325.44
$675.15
$3,681.94
$124.12
$2,485.75
$351.00
$225.00
$4,752.00
$277.25
$107.28
$1,303.20
$581. 49
$11. 85
$53.25
$64.88
$359.97
$8,175.00
$315.66
$68.61
$290.45
$1,123.63
$176.00
$550.91
$406.16
$76.36
$220.00
$2,205.51
$1,007.44
$136.65
$1,942.84
$18.50
$3,087.60
$136.11
$872.50
$888.00
$172.62
$40.00
$2,080.00
$74.55
$61. 85
$279.25
$18.24
$5,785.73
$335.48
$447.84
$60.00
$3,827.30
$1,022.93
$258.97
$228.10
$2,710.92
$534.73
$890.00
$10,982.16
$337.50
VENDOR
DALCO
DELEGARD TOOL CO
DPC INDUSTRIES INC
EARL F ANDERSEN INC
24-JUN-1998 (08 :36)
DESCRIPTION
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT PARTS
CHEMICALS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
EDEN PRAIRIE SCHOOL DISTRICT N PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA, CITY OF CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING
EKLUNDS TREE AND BRUSH DISPOSA WASTE DISPOSAL
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN
ELLEFSON, EUGENE
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC
EPA
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC*
EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEMS INC
FASTSIGNS
FERRELLGAS
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
FMT -FACILITY MANAGEMENT TECH
FORCE AMERICA
G & K SERVICES DIRECT PURCHASE
G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL
GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN
GENERAL MACHINING INC
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN
GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
GN NETCOM/UNEX INC
GOLD COUNTRY INC SIGNATURE CON
GRAYBOW COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPT
GTE DIRECTORIES
GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO INC
GUTERILLY, TJ
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HENNEPIN COUNTY I/T DEPT
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
HIGLEY, STEVE
HIRSHFIELDS
HONEYWELL INC
HONEYWELL INC
ICEMAN/C02 SERVICES, THE
IDEA ART INC
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS*
IMAGE SHOPPE
INTERNATIONAL SUNPRINTS INC
J H LARSON ELECTRICAL COMPANY
J J KELLER & ASSOCIATES INC
J W PEPPER OF MINNEAPOLIS
JANEX INC
KOCH SULFER PRODUCTS
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
LAKE COUNTRY DOOR
LAKE REGION VENDING
LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES
LAND OF LAKES TILE CO
LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW
LANZI, LONNA
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
SAFETY SUPPLIES
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
POSTAGE
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
MOTOR FUELS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
COMPUTERS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
COMPUTERS
REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES
ADVERTISING
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
CHEMICALS
RENTALS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
CHEMICALS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
LEGAL SERVICE
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
TRAINING SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CHEMICALS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS
TOBACCO PRODUCTS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
LEGAL SERVICE
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
PROGRAM
EPCC MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CAPITAL OUTLAY-PARK
HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC
WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE
TREE REMOVAL
ELECTION
SOFTBALL
STORM DRAINAGE
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
STORM DRAINAGE
GENERAL
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
ICE ARENA
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
ICE ARENA
STREET LIGHTING
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
FITNESS CENTER
GENERAL
POLICE
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
POOL LESSONS
PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1
FLYING CLOUD ATHLETIC FIELDS
SOFTBALL
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
POLICE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SOFTBALL
POLICE-CITY CENTER
SENIOR CENTER
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
POOL MAINTENANCE
REC SUPERVISOR
POLICE
LEGAL COUSEL
AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
PARK MAINTENANCE
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
ART & MUSIC
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
POLICE
MARKETCENTER RESERVOIR
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POOL MAINTENANCE
TEMAN PROPERTY
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64532
64533
64534
64535
64536
64537
64538
64539
64540
64541
64542
64543
64544
64545
64546
64547
64548
64549
64550
64551
64552
64553
64554
64555
64556
64557
64559
64560
64561
64562
64563
64564
64565
64566
64567
64568
64569
64570
64571
64572
64573
64574
64575
64576
64577
64578
64579
64580
64581
64582
64583
64584
64585
64586
64587
$488.00
$465.50
$34,795.96
$15.00
$78.44
$831. 00
$272 .16
$1,463.47
$852.11
$540.00
$852.00
$21,949.37
$61. 57
$411.75
$1,550.00
$700.69
$72.87
$440.00
$80.00
$19,084.00
$5,831.74
$132.59
$765.09
$798.46
$370.63
$1,064.56
$5,410.11
$100.00
$266.00
$370.63
$347.60
$153.49
$3,199.00
$510.00
$574.82
$38.29
$10,414.37
$159.75
$80.00
$252.48
$1,218.00
$1,493.65
$2,173.82
$106.00
$180.00
$369.08
$63.08
$304.50
$25,047.28
$110.95
$268.80
$280.00
$155.80
$63.05
$53,803.50
VENDOR
LASER LABS INC
LAVALLE, FRANK
LOGIS
M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
MARINE RESCUE PRODUCTS INC
MATEJCEKS
MCGOWAN, CATHERINE
MCSB INC
MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
METALS JOINING LAB CO INC
METRO LAWN SPRINKLERS
METROPOLITAN FORD
MIDWEST CONTAINER SYSTEMS
MIDWEST WINDOW & SIDING
MINN BLUE DIGITAL
MINNCOMM PAGING
MINNCOR INDUSTRIES
MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
MUNICILITE
NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE
NORTH STAR ICE
NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY IN
OBERLE, KAREN TOLLISON
ON BELAY OUTDOOR ADVENTURES
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS
OXFORD CAPITAL ILLINOIS LLC
P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC
PANELCRAFT
PLEHAL BLACKTOPPING INC
PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY
PRAIRIE LAWN AND GARDEN
PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING
PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL INC
PRINTERS SERVICE INC
QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC
R HOLMES CONCRETE INC
RAMBOW INC
RDO EQUIPMENT CO
REAL GEM
REIN, SCOTT
RESPOND SYSTEMS
RIA GROUP
RITZ CAMERA
RMR SERVICES INC
ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC
ROBICHONS THE IN-LINE SKATE SC
S/K WELL & PUMP INSPECTIONS
SALLY DISTRIBUTORS
SANCO CLEANING SUPPLIES
SBS MECHANICAL INC
24-JUN-1998 (08 :36)
DESCRIPTION
OTHER EQUIPMENT
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
LOGIS SERVICE
MISC TAXABLE
EQUIPMENT PARTS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
COMPUTERS
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
PARK EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT PARTS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
COMMUNICATIONS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING
MISCELLANEOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
PRINTING
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING
MISC TAXABLE
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
CONTRACTED COMM MAINT
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CONTRACTED BLDG REPAIRS
LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES
CONTRACTED STRIPING
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
WASTE DISPOSAL
BUILDING
CLOTHING & UNIFORMS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
AWARDS
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
SAFETY SUPPLIES
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT PARTS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
BUILDING
II
POLICE
SOFTBALL
PROGRAM
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ROUND LAKE-BEACH
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
POLICE
ADULT PROGRAM
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FLYING CLOUD FIELDS K15
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS
1996 REHABILITATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
WATER UTILITY-GENERAL
EPCC MAINTENANCE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE
GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES
INSPECTION-ADMIN
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
VOLLEYBALL
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
POLICE
SR CTR OPERATIONS
PARK MAINTENANCE
1996 REHABILITATION
STARING LAKE
SENIOR CENTER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TRAFFIC SIGNS
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
ICE ARENA
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CC CAPITAL OUTLAY
OAK POINT OPERATIONS
STORM DRAINAGE
IN SERVICE TRAINING
SOFTBALL
EQUIPMENT ~INTENANCE
WATER UTILITY-GENERAL
TREE DISEASE
WATER METER REPAIR
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
PRESCHOOL EVENTS
WATER WELL #1
POOL SPECIAL EVENTS
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT
64588
64589
64590
64591
64592
64593
64594
64595
64596
64597
64598
64599
64600
64601
64602
64603
64604
64605
64606
64607
64608
64609
64610
64611
64612
64613
64614
64615
64616
64617
64618
64619
64620
64621
64622
64623
64624
64625
64626
64627
64628
64629
64630
64632
64633
64634
64635
64636
64637
64638
64639
64640
64641
64642
64643
$106.49
$1,595.90
$505.40
$692.40
$79.73
$488.90
$360.88
$3,205.82
$1,051. 75
$219.20
$394.05
$1,139.50
$1,268.14
$407.38
$13.14
$841. 53
$1,650.75
$10.91
$992.96
$10,780.70
$15,123.00
$164.01
$3,300.00
$207.68
$138.88
$286.93
$281.43
$7,216.60
$1,299.30
$317.31
$191.17
$601.48
$47.93
$17.97
$831.31
$760.75
$180.00
$2,420.00
$833.19
$316.93
$203.50
$64.00
$1,582.96
$190.00
$70.00
$26.00
$120.00
$44.00
$123.33
$208.00
$44.00
$114.04
$47.00
$40.00
$23.00
VENDOR
SEARS
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO
SIT, ERIC
SJF
SNAP-ON TOOLS
SNELL MECHANICAL INC
SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING-
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING-
SPORTS WORLD USA INC
SPORTSDESK, INC
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
STANDARD REGISTER
STAR TRIBUNE
STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC
STREICHERS
SUBURBAN PROPANE
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I
SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS
SYSTECH SERVICES
TOWN AND COUNTRY DODGE
TREES INC
TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN MTKA
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC
US FILTER/WATERPRO
VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC
VOSS LIGHTING
VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS
W W GRAINGER INC
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO
WALMART STORES INC
WATER SPECIALITY OF MN INC
WATSON CO INC, THE
WESTACOTT, JOEL
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
WM MUELLER AND SONS INC
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZOELLNER, MARK
AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
BEAVER MOUNTAIN
BORSCH, MICHELLE
BRIDENSTINE, LORI
CIRCUS PIZZA
GRASSO, JUDITH
KOFFRON, BEVERLY
MANNING, JODY
MCCARTAN, PEGGY
MEYER, NICOLE
OLSON, COURTNEY
PERSZYK, JOHN
PETTY CASH
24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
DESCRIPTION
MISC FIRE EQUIPMENT
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
INSTRUCTOR SERVICE
OTHER EQUIPMENT
SMALL TOOLS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
CABLE TV
LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING
REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
MISC NON-TAXABLE
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER EQUIPMENT
MOTOR FUELS
TIRES
OTHER EQUIPMENT
COMPUTERS
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
RESERVE EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT PARTS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHEMICALS
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT PARTS
EQUIPMENT PARTS
FURNITURE & FIXTURES
REPAIR & MAl NT SUPPLIES
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
GRAVEL
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
TELEPHONE
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
LESSONS/CLASSES
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
FAMILY RESIDENT MEMBERSHIP
LESSONS/CLASSES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL
SPECIAL EVENTS FEES
ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG
OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES
/$\
PROGRAM
FIRE
EPCC MAINTENANCE
SPRING SKILL DEVELOP
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
TRAFFIC SIGNS
EPCC MAINTENANCE
PARK MAINTENANCE
COMMUNITY SERVICES
GENERAL
HUMAN RESOURCES
SOFTBALL
TREE DISEASE
TH212/SHADY OAK/FLYING CLOUD
FINANCE DEPT
PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3
STREET LIGHTING
POLICE
WATER UTILITY-GENERAL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EDEN PRAIRIE REALFLOW
POLICE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
REFORESTATION
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
POLICE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
EPCC MAINTENANCE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM
POOL MAINTENANCE
CONCESSIONS
PARK FACILITIES
POLICE STATION
STORM DRAINAGE
RILEY LAKE-BEACH
SOFTBALL
SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM
SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL
TEEN WORK PROGRAM
SUMMER SKILL DEvELOP
POOL LESSONS
TEEN WORK PROGRAM
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN
POOL LESSONS
PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND
AFTERNOON PLAYGROUND
SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS
SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP
POOL SPECIAL EVENTS
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 24-JUN-1998 (08:36)
CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
64644 $36.51 POWERS, BETH HOPE LOAN RECEIVABLE hope auto repair
64645 $138.45 RAINBOW FOODS -CHARGES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ARTS
64646 $4,934.39 RICHFIELD, CITY OF OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
64647 $156.75 SINELL, STEVE TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING
64648 $122.35 SWENSON, DON TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE
64649 $343.37 THIES, DOUG TRAVEL FIRE
64650 $29.00 TOMLINSON, TERRI LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS
64651 $60.00 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING
$905,008.51*
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: July 7, 1998
Section: Petitions and Requests
Department: PRNR Subject: Friendship Ventures Request to Revise
JlIIL it. Robert A. Lambert, Director Lease Agreement for Camp Edenwood
ofPRNR
REQUEST:
Attached to this memorandum is a request from Edward Stracke, President & CEO of Friendship
Ventures, to make several revisions to the existing lease agreement between the City of Eden Prairie
and Friendship Ventures for Camp Edenwood.
RECOMMENDATION:
I have requested the City Attorney to review the request from Friendship Ventures and have attached
a copy of Mr. Pauly'S comments concerning Friendship Ventures request.
City staff concur with Mr. Pauly's comments and have the following recommendations regarding the
various requested amendments:
Article II -Although the City agrees that the terminology for the existing purchase agreement is
outdated and may be offensive to people with disabilities, the language should be retained to be
consistent with the transfer of the property from Hennepin County to the City of Eden Prairie. That
transfer agreement provides restrictions on the use of property that is consistent with the language
of the lease agreement to Friendship Ventures.
Article III -City staff understand the rationale for the request from Friendship Ventures, especially
in light of the fact that they intend to make substantial investments relating to improvements to the
property. It would be difficult for Friendship Ventures to obtain grants and donations with less than
a 30 year lease; therefore, staff would recommend extending the lease agreement to 2028 and
retaining the language in the lease that allows the City and Friendship Ventures to reevaluate the use
of the property at that time. The restrictions on the use ofthe property from Hennepin County will
be retained forever; therefore, unless the mission of Friendship Ventures changes significantly over
the next 30 years there should not be a problem with extending the lease in the year 2028.
Article VI -City staff concur with the City Attorney's concerns that Friendship Ventures not sublease
the use of this camp for groups that are not consistent with the restrictions on the use ofthe property.
This does not mean that other organizations such as the Lions Club, a church or another profit group
could not use the property on a short term single use basis, or for example, as a meeting place when
the camp is not in use to provide programs and services with people with disabilities. We would
I
I
support the requested amended version, which would require Friendship Ventures to obtain written
consent from the City to sublease the camp for any purpose other than activities incidental to the
purpose of the Lessee.
Article XIII -Staff concur with the City Attorney's recommendation that if the City were to accept
the proposed amendment there should be added a formula where the depreciated value of the
property can be determined at the time of the occurrence of the damage or destruction. It should also
be made clear that the intent is that any money received by the Lessee would be from the insurance
proceeds only and not from other funds of the City.
Article XX -Mr. Stracke is proposing to exclude this article from the lease agreement. City staff
recommend the Council deny this request. That section of trail is a critical east/west connection
between County Road 4 and Edenvale Boulevard through a City park. Staff are certain that with
proper design, and the cooperation of Friendship Ventures, this trail can be constructed without
causing undue conflict between the public and Friendship Ventures clients.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:
The City has had extensive discussions with staff from Friendship Ventures regarding the City's desire
to preserve the historically significant buildings on this site. The Council may wish to consider
whether or not preserving these buildings should be a condition of the lease, provided that condition
does not cause undue hardship or extensive additional cost to provide the programs and services
which the camp is operating.
The Council may also wish to consider revising the cost of the lease to include an annual amount that
would allow Friendship Ventures to pay the water and sewer connection over a 15 year period.
BL:mdd
cc: Scott Kipp
Carl Jullie
Chris Enger
Ed Stracke
FriendshipIBob98
2
May 8, 1998
Friendship Ventures
Operating Camp Friendship and Eden Wood Center
10509 108TH ST. NW • ANNANDALE. MINNESOTA 55302
(320) 274-8376 • FAX (320) 274-3238
Mayor Dr. Jean L. Harris and Members of the City Council
City of Eden Prairie
8080 Mitchell Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230
RE: Amendments to Lease between the City of Eden Prairie and Friendship Ventures
Friendship Ventures has estimated that within the next five years, our agency will be investing
more than a $1,000,000 in new construction and building improvements at the Eden Wood
Center. Weare requesting that the current lease between the City of Eden Prairie and
Friendship Ventures be amended as follows:
Page 1, paragraph 3 and Article II:
Current language ... program for mentally retarded and developmentally delayed children
and adults within Hennepin County and other disadvantaged residents of
Hennepin County.
Amended version ... program for children and adults with disabilities and other
disadvantaged residents.
Rationale: The terminology is outdated and offensive to people with disabilities.
Article Ill:
Current language · .. terminating on the 31st day of December, 2014.
Amended version ... terminating on the 31st day of December, 2097.
Rationale: Considering the significant investment being made by Friendship Ventures, we
need a guarantee that this investment be available to provide services for children
and adults with disabilities beyond the 16 years remaining on the lease.
Article VI:
Current language
Amended version
· .. Lessee shall not sublet the whole or any part of the premises or assign
all or any part of its present interest in this Lease without first obtaining
the written consent of the Lessor to any such sublease or assignment.
· .. Lessee shall not sublet the whole or any part of the premises or assign
all or any part of its present interest in this Lease without first obtaining
the written consent of the Lessor to any such sublease or assignment,
e.x,cept for activities incidental to the purpose of the Lessee.
Serving children and adults with developmental disabilities since 1964
.3
page two
Article VI (continued): ,
Rationale: Providing education and awareness to the general public about people with
disabilities and providing fInancial assistance to clients and their families are
important aspects of the mission and purpose of Friendship Ventures; to help
achieve these goals, Friendship Ventures makes its facilities available to churches,
service organizations, community groups and other nonprofit groups in addition
to providing direct care services.
Correct typo on Article XI .. .it currently reads Article "VI".
Article XIII, (b):
Current language
Amended version
In the event Lessee elects not to repair or rebuild any such building or
improvement in accordance with paragraph VII hereof, all of such
proceeds shall remain the sole property of Lessor.
In the event Lessee elects not to repair or rebuild any such building or
improvement in accordance with paragraph VII hereof, the Lessee shall
receive the depreciated value of the property. Any and all remaining
proceeds shall be awarded sole property 0/ Lessor.
Rationale: Friendship Ventures should receive reasonable compensation for any significant
investment made towards the improvement of this facility.
Article XX:
Current language Lessor reserves the right and Lessee specifically agrees to permit, the
construction of a trail over the northerly part of the premises consisting of
approximately a 20 foot wide corridor more particularly described in
Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made part hereof
Amended version Exclude entire article from the lease.
Rationale: Friendship Ventures goes to great lengths to protect clients from being placed in
vulnerable situations; a public trail extending onto the Eden Wood property would
place extremely vulnerable people in situations that would be difficult for
Friendship Ventures to control.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me.
S~rel~, 9 (' 7-" /J ~~ ~L.>2-
Edward J. Stracke
President & CEO
g:\fIles\ew-city
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: June 30, 1998
SECTION: Reports of Council Members
DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO:
Building & Community Recommendations from Housing
Development Maintenance Study Team 11A. /.
Kevin· Schmieg
David Lindahl
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Adopt recommendations of the Housing Maintenance Study Team:
• Form a short term citizen task force to advise the City Council on whether it should adopt a "Time-
of-Sale" Truth in Housing Inspection Ordinance. The Committee would include about eight citizens,
four randomly selected Vision 2001 participants, and four others from existing Boards or
Commissions (yet to be determined). It also could appoint a real estate professional.
• Direct staff (Inspections Dept.) to prepare and process through the Council a property maintenance
code to help correct primarily exterior building issues on a complaint basis only.
• Direct staff (Inspections/Community Development/Communications) to prepare educational
materials regarding housing maintenance tips, general maintenance schedules, and rehabilitation
resources and distribute to residents.
• Direct staff (Zoning) to continue to evaluate whether a general nuisance code is necessary above
and beyond the City's current zoning code.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council instructed staff to examine the general condition of the City's housing stock to
determine if a housing maintenance code or other special City initiative is necessary to help main~in
the safety, appearance, and general condition of ownership housing units in Eden Prairie. A teartity
staff and Councilmember Tyra.Lukens was organized to look into this issue and report back to the
Council. They found after a series of meetings that although the City's housing stock is relatively new
and in good condition, the number of housing maintenance issues will increase as properties age. To
effectively address a growing number of housing maintenance complaints, additional tools will be
needed by the City. The team supported a comprehensive program that would combine educational
efforts with adoption and enforcement of a housing maintenance code. A housing maintenance code
would allow the City to deal with a variety of maintenance issues, including rotted siding and windows,
lack of paint, and other similar issues. They also evaluated a variety of "time of sale" ordinances used
by a number of other communities, which require inspections before homes can be sold. Since this type
of ordinance would impact many residents (about 750 existing homes sold each year), it would be
appropriate to form a citizen task force to look into this further.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
June 19 memo to City Council
Housing inspection ordinance options
I
To:
From:
Date:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
David Lindahl, HRA Manager
Kevin Schmieg, Building Official
June 19, 1998
Subject: Update on Housing Maintenance Study
At the suggestion of Councilmember Tyra Lukens, the City Council instructed staff to examine
the general condition of the City's housing stock to determine if a housing maintenance code or
other special City initiative is necessary to help maintain the safety, appearance, and general
condition of ownership housing units in Eden Prairie. The purpose of this memo is to inform the
Council of the progress made so far.
The following group has been involved in two meetings held June 2 and June 17:
Nancy Tyra Lukens
Kevin Schmieg
Chris Enger
Dan Carlson
Jean Johnson
David Lindahl
Steve Sinell
Dave Boswell
City Council
Facilitator
Management
Police
Zoning
Housing Programs
Assessor
Appraiser
Do we have a maintenance problem with ownership housing?
According to a table distributed by Steve Sinell, about 69% of all the ownership housing in E. P.
is in excellent or good condition. About 30% is in average condition, which usually means that it
needs paint or minor cosmetic work. Only .8% was in fair condition, and 12 units were
considered substandard.
What type of calls do we usually get about maintenance issues and how are they
currently addressed?
Calls on Homes:
Real Problems
Lack of Paint (exterior)
Rotted Wood (Fascia/Soffit)
Subjective or
Perceived problems
Paint Color
Siding Style/Color
How Are They
Currently Addressed?
• No Code -repairs requested
• Referred to City Rehab Program
• No Code-repairs requested
• Referred to Rehab Program
Real Problems
Rotted/Bad Siding
Rotted/Old Doors
Broken Windows
Rotted Decks
Bad Roof
Old Accessory Buildings
Abandoned Buildings
Calls on PropertyNards:
Real Problems
Fences
Garbage
Old CarslTrucks
Old Accessory Buildings
Long Grass
Subjective or
Perceived problems
Window Style
Roof Style/Color
Color/Style
Subjective or
Perceived problems
Fence Color/Style
How Are They
Currently Addressed?
• No Code-repair requested
• Referred to Rehab Program
• No Code-repairs requested
• Referred to Rehab Program
• Code if safety issue
• Bldg. Code
• Bldg. Code
• Code if a nuisance
• Bldg. Code
How Are They
Currently Addressed?
• No Code-repair requested
• Code, Community Development
• Code, Police
• Code if a nuisance
• Code, Parks
Is a "time of sale" housing inspection ordinance needed?
Although the City's housing stock is relatively new and in good condition, the number of housing
maintenance issues will increase as properties age. It appeared from a "Bell Curve" example
that Kevin gave that it may behoove the City to consider adopting a comprehensive housing
maintenance and property nuisance program while its housing stock is still in good condition.
Two basic approaches to addressing this issue were discussed:
Non-RegulatorvNoluntarv
Education:
Voluntary:
• provide information to home owners about resources available for home
repairs.
• provide home maintenance or repair tips and general maintenance timetables,
i.e., life of roofs, water heaters, furnaces, siding, paint, etc.
• request that home owners repair homes when necessary.
Regulatory (codes & ordinances)
The City could also be more proactive in helping address housing maintenance issues by
adopting additional codes. The following list of cities have "time of sale" housing inspection
ordinances (see attachment).
Hopkins
Crystal
Bloomington
New Hope
Richfield
Minneapolis
S1. Louis Park
Osseo
Hopkins: Building official Tom Anderson said that they have made significant progress over the
last four years in successfully dealing with nuisance and housing maintenance issues. He said
that communities should have as many tools as possible to address these problems. A
comprehensive approach that he advocated includes the following:
1. Adoption of the International Property Maintenance Code.
2. Adoption of a General Nuisance Code.
3. Adopt a Time of Sale Housing Disclosure Ordinance (see attachment) -Hopkins has
about 250 sales each year. About 40% or 100 homes have hazards that require correction
by the seller. An inspection from a certified evaluator is required by the seller before each
sale.
4. Deal with complaints promptly and write orders to assure compliance if necessary.
5. Keep a computer database to track all complaints through completion.
New Hope
Inspector Scott Dornfelt indicated that New Hope's Dwelling and Maintenance Ordinance, which
was adopted in 1977, has been very effective. Their code required inspections on all residential
property before every sale. Unlike Hopkins, New Hope conducts all the inspections, which can
take from ~ to 1 hour per inspection. The City charges $85 per inspection case, which includes
the initial inspection and any follow up. All items need to be fixed before a sale closes, or the
buyer can agree to make corrections within 60 days after closing. See the attached summary of
inspection ordinances for more information.
What are the next steps?
There seemed to be a consensus that the City should have as many tools as possible to deal
with housing maintenance issues. There is not a need for a general nuisance ordinance at this
time since the City's zoning code effectively addresses most property nuisance complaints. The
following tasks will be completed by the next meeting in July:
• Kevin, Jean, and Dave will evaluate various "time of sale" ordinances to see which might
apply best to Eden Prairie, and how much it will cost the City to administer.
• Kevin will further examine the International Property Maintenance Code to determine if it
should be adopted by the City.
• Dan will check the Police database to see what information could be shared with other
departments as part of a large "citywide" database.
• Jean will check with the Computer Software Application Committee to see if one database
for tracking housing maintenance and nuisance issues can be developed for all
departments.
• Jean will contact the Minneapolis Board of Realtors for input about the various "time of sale"
ordinances currently used by other communities and find out what approach they endorse, if
any.
• Nancy will explore with Mayor Harris how any changes to our code could be processed with
the public. A few ideas included running it through existing commissions, solicit feedback
from residents through the next citywide survey, assemble a special task force from existing
commissions, or from residents.
houslng'Genera1\maintain.98
1998 Yearbook
II)
city of
bloomington
National. State and Local Laws and Regulations • 19
Time of Sale Housing Inspection Ordinances
Bloomington -The Time-or-Sale Housing Inspection Prog~am: The program provides
potential purchasers with information about the condition of a dwelling and requires the correction
of immediate hazards. An inspection and a report are required for:all houses offered for sale. All
single family. two family, and multiple family dwellings, including condominiums, townhouses
and mobile homes are included. The property must be inspected and a report form completed prior
to offering the property for sale. The Housing Evaluation Report must be available for review by
potential purchasers at all times when the property is offered for sale. The seller can choose either a licensed independent
contractor or the City's Building and Inspection Division staff. All inspectors are required to be licensed by the city of
Bloomington. The city maintains a list of all licensed inspectors. Only those items which pose an immediate hazard to the
occupants of the structure are required to be repaired. Other deficiencies are noted in the Housing Evaluation Report, but
do not require correction. When hazardous items are identified by the inspector, the City of Bloomington follows up to
determine whether the hazardous condition has been corrected. Hazardous conditions must be corrected and approved by
the city before the dwelling is occupied. If the dwelling is already occupied, corrective action shall be taken by the owner
or agent of the owner. For more information. call City of Bloomington Building and Inspection Division. 948-8930.
Crystal -Mandatory Code Compliance: The City of Crystal requires an inspection of
all dwelling units at time of sale by the city housing inspector. "Dwelling Unit" is defined as a
single or two family property. a duplex, a condominium, or a townhouse. It is unlawful in Crystal
for an owner to convey a dwelling without providing the buyer a certificate of compliance or a
disclosure statement at time of sale.
The certificate of compliance issued by the Crystal housing inspector indicates that the
property has been inspected and any conditions found in violation of city code have been noted. The owner is responsible
for the corrections required by the compliance order.
As an alternative procedure. the owner may provide the prospective buyer at the date of execution of any document
conveying the property, a written disclosure statement stating the conditions in the property that. if not corrected. will
constitute a major structural defect or an immediate health and safety hazard. In this instance. the buyer is presumed to have
purchased the property with notice of this condition and is responsible for the corrective actions required by the ordinance.
Call 531-1000 for more information.
~ Hopkins -Truth in Housing Disclosure: Hopkins has a time of sale housing inspection
~ .. -~ ordinance requiring a truth in housing disclosure report to be completed by an independent truth ~~ in housing evaluator. The ordinance requires inspection of all one to four unit dwellings including
condominiums and townhouses. The Truth in Housing Disclosure Report must be available for
CITY OF HOPKINS review whenever the property is offered for sale.
The ordinance does include a section titled, Mandatory Correction of Hazardous Items. Items
listed in this section must be corrected if noted on the disclosure report. These hazardous items are related to gas piping,
water heaters, furnaces, gas fired appliances, free standing space heaters, venting systems, ungrounded electrical fixtures,
and rooms being used as bedrooms without proper egress.
By including this section, the Hopkins ordinance combines truth in housing disclosure for most items with code
compliance and mandatory repairs for life threatening items. For information, call 935-8474.
Minneapolis -Truth in Housing Disclosure: The purpose of the Minneapolis Truth in Housing
Ordinance is to inform the buyer and seller of a home, prior to the time of sale, of any major
structural defects or hazards to the health and safety of the occupants. This is a disclosure
ordinance and not code enforcement.
The ordinance requires that the seller of single and two family dwellings and townhouses in
the City of Minneapolis provides either a Truth in Housing Disclosure Report or a certificate of
Code Compliance to the purchaser of the home prior to time of signing a purchase agreement. Condominiums and sales
of new units are exempt. The truth in housing report must be prepared by a certified truth in housing evaluator, generaIIy
hired by the se11er. The ordinance requires that the completed truth in housing evaluation, the certificate of ~ode
compliance, or the orders resulting from a code compliance inspection be available for inspection at the premises ataH tImes
when the dwelling is being offered for sale. The fee for the truth in housing inspection is negotiated between the seIler and
the evaluator. A new disclosure report, certificate, or orders resulting from a Certificate of Code Compliance inspection
shall be required for each change of ownership at time of sale. For more information, call the inspections department at
673-2031. Or call the automated information number, 673-2489, and ask for option 16.
20' National, State and Local Laws and Regulations 1998 Yearboc
New Hope. Dwelling and Maintenance Ordinance: The New Hope Dwelling and Maintenance
Ordinance requires code compliance inspections on AIl residential property prior to every sale, or
at change of name conveyance (as with repo's, etc). Application is made and inspection fee paid
by the seIler or seIler's agent. Any orders issued are to be completed within 60 days or before
closing, whichever comes first. The City inspector is caIled back for final inspection when all
corrections are made, and the Certificate of Compliance is then issued.
A prospective buyer may purchase the property "as-is" by signing an acknowledgment of work ordered (document
provided by the City) agreeing that work shaH be completed within 60 days after closing. Upon receiving this acknowledg-
ment, the seller receives the Certificate of Compliance, so the sale may proceed.
For more information, call 531-5124.
Osseo· Truth in Housing: Effective January 1, 1998, the city of Osseo requires a Truth in Housing
Disclosure Report at the time of sale for all single family, two family, and three and four family
dwellings including condominiums and townhouses.
No owner or agent for the owner may seIl residential properties in Osseo without providing
to the buyer prior to the time of sale a Truth in Housing Disclosure Report issued within one year
of the time of sale. The report shall be made available for inspection at the property at all times when the property is being
offered for sale.
The ordinance requires that items noted as hazardous by the housing inspector on the report must be repaired by the
owner prior to occupancy by the buyer. The buyer may elect to make the required repairs with the written consent of the city.
CaIl Osseo for more information, 425-2624. t10r/ 17~1) .....
•
Richfield· Mandatory Code Compliance: Richfield requires that all single family homes and
two family homes obtain a Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance and be inspected by
Richfield city inspectors at the time of sale.
A city inspector will conduct an inspection of the property. Appointments will be made with
owners in advance so that closing dates are not affected.
If violations exist at the time of inspection, a notice will be given to the owner indicating the areas that are to be corrected
and the timeframe in which this is to be accomplished. A follow-up inspection will be conducted and a Certificate of Housing
Maintenance Compliance will be issued if the violations have been corrected.
A prospective owner shall not occupy the structure prior to the issuance of the certificate except in extraordinary or
exceptional circumstances.
During the period of one year following its issuance, a certificate may be accepted by the city in satisfaction of the
requirements without the need for a second inspection unless alterations and remodeling have occurred which would warrant
reinspection and provided that the seller is the one who is named on the certificate ..
An application must be completed whenever a single family home or two family home is to be sold. This application
is to be completed and mailed back to the city with the appropriate license fees as soon as the closing date has been set. For
more information contact the Inspections division at 861-9882.
A(fh CITYOF
ST. LOUIS
PARK
St. Louis Park -Mandatory Code Compliance: This ordinance applies to all single and two
family units, townhouses and condominiums. The present occupant or owner must make applica-
tion for .the certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance. The initial housing inspection must
be completed before a seller can accept a purchase agreement.
When a home is being sold: Either the homeowner or owner's agent comes to city hall and pays
the application fee and is given a list of licensed private housing inspectors. The owner hires a licensed private housing
inspector to conduct the initial code compliance inspection. (You must use one of the people on the city's list of licensed
private inspectors.) The owner pays the private inspector whatever fee they agreed upon. If the inspector finds no housing
code violations, the owner is given a Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance and receives a partial refund of the
city's application fee. If the housing inspector finds any code violations, work orders are issued. After the owner makes the
necessary repairs or corrections, the city housing inspector does a follow-up inspection to verify that all repairs have been
completed and meet city code. Once corrections are made, a Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance is issued.
A house must comply wi th the codes that were in effect at the time the home was constructed. Corrections must be made
if the deficiency was a violation of the code when the home was built or if the deficiency poses a safety hazard. Life-safety
hazards must be corrected, even if the deficiency was not a code requirement when the home was constructed. Many items,
such as ceiling heights, floor area and window size, are exempt from the code if they are considered "built-in deficiencies"
and do not present a safety hazard.
If the structure complies with the housing code, the city manager wiIl issue a certificate to the present owner or
occupant. This certificate is then filed with the city. The prospective buyer shall not take occupancy of the dwelling before
the certificate has been filed with the city. The Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance is valid for one year from
the date of issuance. For more information call 924-2588.
Housing Inspection Ordinances
(three basic options)
Option 1
Truth in Housing Disclosure
(least demanding)
The purpose of this type of ordinance is to inform prospective home buyers of any major
defects or hazards with a property before it is purchased. Home sellers are not required to
correct defects, but must have an inspection and disclosure report available to prospective
buyers and the city.
Cities with this type of ordinance include:
Minneapolis (City Council now considering upgrading to option 1)
Osseo
Option 2
Truth in Housing Disclosure & Compliance
(moderately demanding)
Like option 1, this type of ordinance requires that an inspection is conducted by a qualified
evaluator (city/private inspector) and that the inspection report be available to prospective
buyers and the city. However, unlike it option 1, it also requires correction of any
hazardous items by the sellers, including: gas piping, water heaters, furnaces, gas fired
appliances, free standing space heaters, venting systems underground fixtures, bedroom
egress.
Cities with this type of ordinance include:
Bloomington
Hopkins
New Hope (can sell "as is" if buyer agrees)
Option 3
Mandatory Code Compliance
(most demanding)
This ordinance requires an inspection, disclosure, and correction of any/all code violations.
Sellers must obtain a Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance before they can sell
their house.
Cities with this general type of ordinance:
St. Louis Park
Richfield
Crystal
11
lVIINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
August 4, 1997
Mr. John Gertz
Eden Prairie Center
8080 Mitchell Road
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
Dear Mr. Gertz:
RE: Glen Lake Children's Camp Site Inspection, July 24, 1997
Charles Nelson and I thank you for making the arrangements for our inspection of the above
property. Our inspection reveals that the site contains three buildings (Dining HalllRecreation
Building, Dormitory, and garage) and one stone monument which date to the historic period.
Five modem buildings are also located on the camp site.
The two principal historic buildings retain good historic physical integrity, both on the interior
and exterior, although it was apparent that the current occupants of the camp are in the process of
replacing some of the historic doors with off-the-shelf doors. We also noticed that were previous
attempts to modify a couple windows (one each in the dorm and dining hall). This replacement
activity which is happening incrementally does have a cumulative effect and eventually will
seriously affect the historic physical appearance of these buildings. Since these two buildings
were intended for summer use, they are inherently fragile and the removal of even minor
elements will alter the physical qualities that identify them as a summer camp facility.
The landscape integrity of the site is fair to good, but its setting and feeling has been
compromised by the construction of the four modem buildings. It is not known if the paths
leading down to the lake are from the historic or modem era. The grounds behind the buildings
retain a sense of openness and the mature vegetation helps to convey a camp-like setting. We
were not able to discern if any landscape features from the historic era remain such as trails,
paths, or designed recreational or play areas, and it is not known at this time if historic landscape
plans exist.
After our inspection, a review of the historical documentation followed. It is the opinion of the
State Historic Preservation Office that the Glen Lake Children's Camp appears eligible for
nomination to the National Register of Historic Places under National Register Criterion A in the
area of health and medicine as a significant and rare example of a facility constructed for the
treatment of children infected with tuberculosis.
However, we must reiterate that the camp by virtue of its being a seasonal facility is inherently
fragile. The buildings were constructed not only to let the weather in, but to allow recuperating
children to enjoy the benefits of spending the summer at the lake. While the camp site has been
compromised by the construction of new buildings and the historic buildings affected by the
installation of new doors, neither alteration, at present, is sufficient to disqualify the camp for
consideration for nomination to the National Register. However, if the buildings continue to be
altered, if either of the historic buildings are removed, or if new construction is sited in such a
way that the relationship of the two buildings to each other, to the lake shore, or to the open
playground area is obscured or compromised, the camp will no longer retain the qualities which
this office had determined renders it eligible for the National Register.
Our site inspection did reveal that it appears possible to modify the buildings on the interior for
year-round use, and the inspection revealed that it may be possible to construct a new building
on the perimeter of the camp, perhaps to the side and behind the Dining Hall. The proposal to
construct a new road on a fonner railroad bed \vould not introduce another modern element
directly into the camp site.
This office would be happy to work with you on the rehabilitation of the camp buildings, and
discuss how the Glen Lake Children's Camp can continue to serve persons with special needs.
Sincerely,
,-/--; --,<.;.av-~-kofL-
Susan Roth
National Register Historian
State Historic Preservation Office