Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 05/18/1998 I CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP 1999 PRELIMINARY BUDGET PROCESS TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1998 5:00 PM, CITY CENTER Heritage Room IV COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Finance Director Don Uram, Director of Assessing Steve Sinell, Director of Public Works Gene Dietz, Director of Human Resources & Community Services Natalie Swaggert, Director of Inspections Kevin Schmieg, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Chief of Police Jim Clark, Lead-Accountant Sue Kotchevar, Facilities Manager Barbara Cross, Fire Chief Spencer Conrad, and Recording Secretary ROLL CALL I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. OVERVIEW OF 1999 PROPOSED BUDGET A. JNTRODUCTION B. 1997 BUDGET TO ACTUAL RESULTS C. 1999 BUDGET STRATEGIES D. MAJOR INITIATIVES E. PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES F. BUDGET PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS G. BUDGET OUTLINE FOR SURCHARGE MONIES (ENVIRONMENTAL & WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION H. CONCLUSION III. OTHER BUSINESS IV. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP Date: May 19, 1998 Department: Item Description: Item No.: Public Works Budget Outline for Surcharge Monies I I.G. • Leslie Stovring Requested Action Review and approve the budget proposed by the Environmental and Waste Management Commission (EWMC) for the$50,000 set aside for environmental programs. Background On March 17, 1998 the City Council approved that a portion of the surcharge monies collected be used for Educational Programs, such as: • Educational seminars on landscaping or water conservation • Grant programs for environmental students at the high school or graduate level • Purchase of education-related supplies, including for the Environmental Learning Center. • Establishment of a rebate program for xeriscape landscaping and/or water-saving appliances. • Implementation of a program to contact residents with a surcharge greater than$100 for City inspections of their water system and/or distribution of water conservation related educational materials. The EWMC has established a proposed budget to fit these proposed needs. They are summarized in the following chart. Proposed Budget ITEM •DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Environmental One scholarship will be awarded to a High School student who $750 Scholarship demonstrates active participation in environmental issues in the Community or indicates strong interest in pursuing an environmentally- related career. Summer Camp Two scholarships will be awarded to grade school or middle school $500 Scholarship students to attend an environmentally-related summer camp program, such as the YMCA. Income and interest in environmental programs will be used as the basis for awarding the scholarships. Environmental A grant will be awarded to the High School River's Project for collection $1,500 Grant and analysis of data from the ponds and wetland being constructed at the Water Plant. An ongoing monitoring program for water chemistry and vegetation analysis will developed. Conservation Surcharge Budget May 19, 1998 Educational EWMC would work with a local video producer to prepare a semi- $3,500 Video professional video illustrating use of fertilizers, explanation of our watering restrictions, benefits of buffer strips and xeriscape or native • plant gardening techniques, the storm sewer system and it's connection to our water resources and sprinkler systems and how to improve their efficiency. Paragon Cable equipment will be used and volunteer speakers and assistance will be sought to reduce costs. The video will be approximately 15 minutes long and will be run on Paragon Cable and the Environmental Learning Center. The video will be made available for use by private and commercial residents. Environmental An undergraduate or graduate level student would be hired as an intern $13,500 Intern for 1998/99 to assist with environmental programs within the City. The. main focus of the 1998/99 work plan would include collection and analysis of data for the Groundwater Protection Plan. The intern could also assist with organizing environmentally-related events, such as the 1999 Environmental Fair. Appliance Monies will be used for rebating residents for purchase of water- $10,000 Rebate conserving appliances, such as toilets or washing machine, to replace Program existing appliances. The program would be structured to provide a$100 rebate to the first 100 applicants. Environmental Informational brochures relating to water conservation and leak detection $3,000 Information will be purchased for distribution to homeowners who have water bills Distribution in excess of$100. Additional brochures or other materials, such as stickers or coloring books,will be purchased to distribute at events such as the Spring Cleanup or Environmental Fair. Bill inserts will also be developed relating to environmental education such as fertilization, watering restrictions or non-point pollution sources at home. Environmental Additional equipment is required for the Environmental Learning Center $15,000 Learning to provide an audio-visual experience for visitors. Eden Prairie students Center are also creating videos for use at the Center as part of their Rivers Equipment Program. Equipment needed at this time includes 3 computers, 4 VCRs and 4 monitors capable of operating with both computers and VCRs. Environmental Software programs for use at the Environmental Learning Center will be $2,250 Software purchased or developed in conjunction with an organization like the Science Museum. The software will address topics such as recycling, storm water or landscaping alternatives. TOTAL $50,000 2 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1998 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans, Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson, Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie, Assistant City Manager Chris Enger, Director of Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS II. OPEN PODIUM III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY. MAY 5. 1998 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST • B. APPROVE ARCHITECT TO DESIGN FIRE STATION REPLACEMENT C. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE D. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MAPLE ADDITION E. APPROVE NSP SERVICE CONTRACTS FOR STREET LIGHTS ON DELL ROAD City Council Agenda Tuesday, May 19, 1998 Page Two F. APPROVE NSP SERVICE CONTRACT FOR STREET LIGHTS ON EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD - PIONEER TRAIL TO TERREY PINE DRIVE G. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT CSAH 39 (VALLEY VIEW ROAD) AND PLAZA DRIVE/TOPVIEW ROAD. I.C. 97-5447 H. ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR TEMPORARY SIGNALS AT CSAH 39 (VALLEY VIEW ROAD) AND PLAZA DRIVE/TOPVIEW ROAD. I.C. 97-5447 I. ADOPT RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT CSAH 39 (VALLEY VIEW ROAD) AND PLAZA DRIVE/TOPVIEW ROAD. I.C. 97-5447 J. APPROVE REQUEST FOR EARLY GRADING PERMIT FOR SETTLERS RIDGE K. OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT by Oppidan Inc. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 2.76 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 2.76 acres. Location: Valley View and Office Ridge Circle (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment and Resolution for Site Plan Review) L. '97 BFI REZONING - SPRINT TOWER by BFI/Sprint. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to 1-2 on 9.5 acres and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 9.5 acres. Location: 9813 Flying Cloud Drive (Ordinance for Zoning District Change and Resolution for Site Plan Review) M. GERRING CAR WASH - REZONING by Gerring Properties. 2nd Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 3.76 acres and Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 2.5 acres and Adopt the Resolution for Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres. Location: Hwy 212 and Aztec Drive (Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning and Resolution for Site Plan Review) City Council Agenda Tuesday, May 19, 1998 Page Three N. ADOPT RESOLUTION RELATING TO A HEALTH CARE FACILITIES REVENUE REFUNDING BOND FINANCING FOR CASTLE RIDGE CARE CENTER. INC., CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA (the "City") V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CHARLSON PROPERTY by Lynn Charlson. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Office on 440 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change) B. BROWN PROPERTY by David Brown. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential and Office on 11.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, east of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change) C. STANDAL PROPERTY by Carol and John Standal. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential and Office on 24.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, east of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change) D. HTG BUILDING by James R. Grover. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Office on .86 acres, Rezoning from Rural to Office on .86 acres, Site Plan Review on .86 acres and Preliminary Plat of .86 acres into one lot. Location: 9300 and 9310 Hennepin Town Road. (Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change, Ordinance for Zoning District Change and Resolution for Preliminary Plat) E. FULLER ROAD BUSINESS CENTER by Mount Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.02 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.02 acres, Rezoning from I-General to 1-2 Industrial on 7.02 acres and Site Plan Review on 7.02 acres. Location: 7905 Fuller Road. (Resolution for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning) VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS City Council Agenda Tuesday, May 19, 1998 Page Four VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. ENVIRONMENTAL & WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION - Budget Outline for Surcharge Monies X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. APPOINTMENT OF BUDGET TEAM MEMBERS B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER 1. APPROVE REVISED LIST OF COUNCIL WORKSHOPS 2. CHANGE IN TORT LIABILITY LIMITS C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS. RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT fie) UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY,MAY 5, 1998 7:30 PM, CITY CENTER Council Chamber 8080 Mitchell Road CITY COUNCIL: Mayor Jean Harris, Sherry Butcher-Younghans,Ronald Case, Ross Thorfinnson,Jr., and Nancy Tyra-Lukens CITY COUNCIL STAFF: City Manager Carl J. Jullie,Assistant City Manager Chris Enger,Director of Parks,Recreation & Natural Resources Bob Lambert, Director of Public Works Eugene Dietz, City Attorney Roger Pauly, and Council Recorder Jan Nelson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. All members were present. PROCLAMATION FOR SENIOR AWARENESS WEEK Mayor Harris read a proclamation proclaiming May 7-18 as Senior Awareness Week and presented a plaque to the Eden Prairie Senior group. I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS Case added item XI.A.2. Butcher-Younghans added item XI.A.3. Jullie said items XI.E.1. and 2. should be deleted. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve the Agenda as published and amended. Motion carried 5-0. II. OPEN PODIUM John Mallo, 14000 Forest Hills Road, said the completion of Forest Hills Road was promised but has not happened. They had a neighborhood meeting on April 9 to discuss the issue of moving a house in the area. A Planning Commission representative said Planning was going to discuss the house moving issue but he does not believe that has occurred. He presented a petition(Attachment A) from the neighborhood residents asking that the completion of Forest Hills Road be tied to the proposed Development. Harris believed there is some forward progress on the termination of the road and asked Staff to look into the issue. I CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 2 Jullie said the house moving issue would require a Public Hearing through the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Mallo noted the house to be moved was not included in the plan. Case asked if moving the house would have to be part of the plan. Jullie said there is no specific requirement that would tie the house moving concept into the approval of the development plan; however, there is a process that involves neighborhood notification and a Public Hearing procedure. A permit would be required as well. III. MINUTES A. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF WORKSHOP HELD TUESDAY.APRIL 21. 1998 Thorfinnson said sentence 1,paragraph 5,page 4 should be changed to: "Case said at a meeting of the Suburban Rate Authority..." MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans,to approve as published and amended the Minutes of the City Council/Staff Workshop held Tuesday, April 21, 1998. Motion carried 5-0. B. CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD TUESDAY.APRIL 21. 1998 Harris said the last sentence of paragraph 3,page 8, should be changed to "The City's revised and updated transportation plan was submitted for review in 1997. The City's Guide Plan is currently ..." MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson,to approve as published and amended the Minutes of the City Council Meeting held Tuesday, April 21, 1998. Motion carried 5-0. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CLERK'S LICENSE LIST B. APPROVAL OF REQUEST OF BID FOR NEW LOCKERS AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER C. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 98-75 ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES D. APPROVAL OF REQUEST FOR GOOSE ROUNDUP AT WINDSONG APARTMENT COMPLEX E. APPROVE MOTION TO NAME THE EDUCATION SPACE WITHIN THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION AREA AS "ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER" 2 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 3 F. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-76 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1998 SEALCOAT. I.C. 98-5457 G. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-77 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR UTILITY TRACTOR.I.C. 98-5460 H. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-78 RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR LINCOLN LANE PAVING.I.C. 52-196 I. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-79 RECEIVING PETITION FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON FULLER ROAD AND ORDER FEASIBILITY STUDY,I.C. 98-5461 J. ADOPT RESOLUTION 98-80 RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR FOREST HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, I.C. 98-5466 K. PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING MAY 14,1998 AS "DAVE ANDERSON DAY"IN THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to approve items A-K on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. SETTLERS RIDGE by Settlers Ridge Limited Partnership (Pemtom). Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 11.77 acres, Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 112 acres, Planned Unit Development District Review on 112 acres, Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 112 acres, Site Plan Review on 11.77 acres and Preliminary Plat on 112 acres into 227 lots and 4 outlots. Location: South of Pioneer Trail and west of Riley Creek. (Resolution 98-81 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change,Resolution 98-82 for PUD Concept Review, Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Change, and Resolution 98-83 for Preliminary Plat) Jullie said the official notice of this Public Hearing was published April 21, 1998, in the Eden Prairie News and mailed to 47 property owners. Dan Herbst,representing Pemtom, reviewed the revised project. He said they are adding two more products--cluster townhomes and upper bracket prime bluff properties. Butcher-Younghans asked if the archeological reports generated for the new land purchase were"available. Herbst said there was a complete report done on the Klein-Peterson property, and they upgraded it to include the new property. He 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 4 said there are no mounds on the Vogel property. Butcher-Younghans was concerned that there were no habitation sites found and said she would like to see the report. Herbst said there are very few mounds shown on the survey west of those on the Brown properties. He said he would get a copy of the upgraded report for Councilmember Butcher-Younghans. Harris asked what the length of the cul-de-sac on B Street is. Herbst said it is about 1700 feet. Enger said in February 1998 the City approved a plan for Settler's Ridge for the Daril Peterson Property. Pemtom is adding the Dorenkemper and Vogel property to make a larger project. The Guide Plan change is for 11.77 acres for the site along Pioneer Trail. The change is from low density residential to medium residential for 61 townhouses. The clustering of units helps preserve larger areas of trees,wetlands,bluff, and creek elsewhere on the site. Enger said the concept plan shows the subdivision of 112 acres into 227 lots at a gross density of 2.01 units per acre. The concept plan has three types of single family homes, including 39 standard R1-13.5 lots along Riley Creek and the City Park to the south, 80 standard R1-9.5 lots, and 47, R1-9.5 lots with waivers for a lots size and street frontage. There are lot size and street frontage waivers. The waivers needed for a density transfer preserve more open space on the property. There is also a cul-de-sac length waiver for Street B. Sixty feet of right-of-way is needed along Pioneer Trail. He said the Planning Commission reviewed this project at its April 13, 1998 meeting and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the project based on a revised plan to eliminate a cul-de-sac by connecting Street H to Street B. Lambert said the Parks,Recreation&Natural Resources Commission voted 7-0 to approve this project at its April 20, 1998 meeting. He said there was extensive discussion about the park dedication, the trails, and the access to the parking lot from the north. Staff has spent a good deal of time in discussions with Mr. Herbst about the park dedication. He did not wish to dedicate any of the 6.6 acres, and Staff felt the City should acquire the land even if it meant land in lieu of park fees. Staff believes it is important to try to preserve the public land up the valley to an area that would be 100 feet or so below the homes. This is an extremely important and beautiful piece of property. He said the other issue is automobile access from the north to the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area,which will not be an easy access to construct. The developer proposed a parking lot on his property with a trail system down to the park area; however,there would probably be a lot of questions about why we didn't provide a parking lot in the park if we don't build the access. Gray said Staff recommended that the right-of-way width on County Road 1 be 60 feet. They would prefer that the trail be included in the right-of-way rather than within the easement. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 5 Dwight Jellie, representing Westwood Planning,reviewed the changes made to the wetland buffer with the new project. He said they will provide 15 foot buffers with some wetland edge signs so the homeowners know where the wetlands are. Case asked if the signs would be carsonite markers. Lambert said they would. Lynette Wheelock, 9576 Crestwood Terrace, said traffic on CSAH 1 is a big issue for the residents as is the park traffic. She asked about the Williams Pipeline corridor. Jellie reviewed the plans for the turn lanes. He said Hennepin County's concerns caused the driveway to be relocated so it will be at the top of the hill in order to improve the sight lines. Jellie then pointed out the pipeline corridor on the project map, noting he believed it is a 66 foot wide easement. Ms Wheelock then asked about the development of the trail system. Lambert said we have not laid out the trail yet,but it will probably have to jump over the creek at points in order to be on flat land. It will probably be five years before we have the hearing process on that. Ms Wheelock was concerned about what effect the increase from low density to medium density on part of the project will have on the natural resources of the creek and on the traffic patterns. She thought there will need to be a signal at the intersection of Crestwood and Pioneer Trail. Perry Forster, 9505 Highview Drive,was concerned about the access into and out of the property. The speed limit on CSAH 1 is 50 mph, and there is a high potential for accidents. There are trees on both sides of the road in this area. He had seen a letter dated May 1 from the Hennepin County permit coordinator to the developer that had a concept of a left turn bay into the project. Not including the left turn lane is a major change and he would like to see details on this so that we are sure there is adequate safety without the turn lane. He would also like to have the City work with Carver and Hennepin Counties to get the speed reduced on CSAH 1. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans,to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 5-0. Case supported Parks Department's recommendation on the public access and agrees that parks need to be accessible to the public. He also supported the park trail proposal as submitted. He too would like to see the speed limit on Pioneer Trail reduced and, with all of the development coming online,would like to see us go through the proper channels to bring about a reduction in the speed limit. He said the Dornkemper home is one of four remaining log cabins left in the City, and he asked that, as a condition of project approval,proponent allow John Gertz to arrange to have it photographed before it is removed. Butcher-Younghans thought lowering the speed limit to 45 mph would be good. She also would like approval conditional upon the State Archaeologist S CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 6 authenticating the burial mounds there. Her understanding is that, once authenticated,the two lots where the burial mounds are located would be made into an outlot and not developed, and that should be a condition for approval. Harris liked the proposal because of the mixed housing on this piece of land. She thought the density transfer protects the value the City has for open space, trees, and the bluffs. She has some concern about the 1700-foot cul-de-sac because that is very long. She would like to see some additional thought given to how that could be decreased and still retain the sense of neighborhood. She asked Gray if there will be an issue of access and safety. Gray said the most concern would be about those people who return in the evening and make left turns into the development. What we have done historically is to provide a by-pass lane for traffic to get around vehicles making a left turn in, such as the ones being put on Hwy 212 at Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road. He thought the new location of the intersection is the best one the County could find along the roadway. There will be another intersection further to the west at some point. Tyra-Lukens was concerned that the entrance to the Klein-Peterson property be marked so that the people who move into the cul-de-sac there don't oppose the entrance when it is put in five years from now. Lambert said we have an option on the Klein-Peterson parcel that ends in 2000. We have applied for a grant to help with the purchase for this year;however it would behoove us to build the access at this point if we plan to buy the property. He suggested we get a right of entry from Klein-Peterson. He thought they would agree to that because if we don't buy the property, it would be an access road to a beautiful lot on their property. Tyra-Lukens asked what our plan is for clearly marking the temporary cul-de-sacs shown on the project. Gray said there are two locations at the far southeast corner for ties into the Brown property. The Brown's have indicated an interest in developing a portion of the property,but he would expect that to continue to be a dead-end even with the development of the Brown property. There is a possibility of extending that to Dell Road in the future but it would be extremely difficult to do. The important connection is the westerly connection to the Zwiers property. There is a gravel road that connects to the Moon Valley property. The second access out to Pioneer Trail is very important, and we would want to sign that very well as a future connection. Tyra-Lukens said she would be very supportive of the recommendation that Street H connect to Street B. She noted that the Planning Commission strongly recommended that a second access be provided for the original proposal, and we discussed that at length at the Council review. They have increased the size with more lots and still really have only one entrance to the development. That bothered her because we gave fairly clear instructions that proponent was to provide a second access prior to 2nd Reading. (0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 7 Thorfinnson agreed there needs to be a connection between Streets H and B. He was also concerned about giving up $218,000 in cash park fees. He was very concerned that, in the absence of a Capital Improvements Plan(CIP), we are making a decision but we don't know if it is a good decision because we don't have enough information. He is very concerned that we have no money set aside for capital improvements and maintenance. He said at some point we have to demand the information we have requested for months. He thought it is foolish to give up $218,000 in fees for this size a piece of property without a real knowledge of the true impact. Harris agreed that we need to get on with defining the CIP but we also have a timing problem with this development. Case agreed that the CIP is desperately needed; however he feels that this is one of those opportunities we can't afford to pass up. He also thought it doesn't make sense to get the second entrance if we don't connect Street H to Street B. Tyra-Lukens reviewed the list of approval conditions for the first development review from the Council Minutes of February 17th. Thorfinnson said he understands the Heritage Preservation Commission provides a list of suggested street names for developers rather than having proponents go to the HPC for suggestions. Case noted we were asking for a second entrance at the first review, and now we are faced with a larger plan without a second entrance. Tyra-Lukens and Harris agreed on the need for the second entrance. Enger suggested Staff be directed to return to the Council prior to 2nd Reading with a recommendation on how to proceed with the second entrance. Herbst said they have worked with Staff to improve the access into the development along Pioneer Trail with the turn lane mechanism and a divided median. He said they have worked hard to create individual neighborhoods within the development, and he was concerned that connecting Streets H and B would disrupt the sense of individual neighborhoods. Tyra-Lukens thought the street connection would not detract from the neighborhood concept, and a lot can be done with such things as markers to keep the sense of neighborhoods. Case thought the conditions from the February 17th meeting should be included as conditions for this project except for rewording the one that dealt with the issue of HPC and street names. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Case, to adopt Resolution 98-81 for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential on 11.77 acres; to adopt Resolution 98-82 for PUD Concept Review on 112 acres; to approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 112 acres and Rezoning from Rural to RM-6.5, R1-9.5 and R1-13.5 on 112 acres; to adopt Resolution 98-83 for Preliminary Plat on 112 acres CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 8 into 227 lots and 4 outlots; and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations with the following Council conditions: 1) a connection be provided between Street H and Street B; 2)proponent to allow Staff to do photo documentation of the log cabin on the property; 3) Lots 3 and 4 to be placed in an outlot based on the verification of the burial mounds; 4) Staff to work with proponent and return to the Council prior to 2nd Reading with a recommendation on how to proceed with the second entrance; 5)placement of carsonite markers to delineate the conservation easement area, 6)placement of the wetland area into an outlot,preferably to be deeded back to the City; 7)proponent to consult the list of suggested street names provided by the Heritage Preservation Commission when naming streets within the development; 8) sidewalks to be placed on Streets E and F. Motion carried 5-0. B. ORDER IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIONEER TRAIL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER,I.C. 98-5458 (Resolution 98-84) Jullie said the official notice for this Public Hearing was published April 23 and April 30, 1998 in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 9 affected property owners. A feasibility study has been prepared for this project. The study identified desirable watermain and sanitary sewer improvements along Pioneer Trail in Section 30. The proposed project would make sanitary sewer available to nine undeveloped parcels and water service available to 12 undeveloped land parcels. Seven of the 12 land parcels are proposed to be developed as Settler's Ridge. Gray reviewed the project, noting that the study concludes the proposed improvements are feasible and cost effective. Furthermore, the proposed improvements are necessary to provide sewer and water service to the proposed Settler's Ridge residential development. He said about 85% of the estimated $1,170,900 cost will go against the properties incorporated in Settlers Ridge. Staff used an acreage assessment rate to determine the assessments. He said they have had two meetings with property owners to explain the proposal. There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Case, to close the Public Hearing; and to adopt Resolution 98-84 ordering the improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for I.C. 98-5458, Pioneer Trail Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. Motion carried 5-0. C. FLYING CLOUD OFFICE BUILDING by Mount Properties. Request for Zoning District Change from C-Hwy to Office on 1.26 acres with variances to be reviewed by the Board of Appeals, Site Plan Review on 1.26 acres and Preliminary Plat of 1.26 acres into 1 lot. Location: 6608 Flying Cloud Drive. (Ordinance for Zoning District Change and Resolution 98-85 for Preliminary Plat) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 9 Jullie said the official notice for this Public Hearing was published April 23, 1998 in the Eden Prairie News and sent to 14 affected property owners. The proposal is for construction of a single-story, 11,000 square foot office building on 1.26 acres. A variance for front yard setback of 25 feet for both building and parking along Flying Cloud Drive is required from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. City Code requires a 35 foot setback. The Board of Adjustments &Appeals will be reviewing the variance request at its May 14, 1998 meeting. Bob Soffeld,representing Mount Properties, reviewed the proposal. Enger said the Planning Commission voted 6-0 for approval of this project at its April 13, 1998 meeting, subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report of April 10, 1998. Lambert said the Parks, Recreation&Natural Resources voted 5-0 for approval at its April 20, 1998 meeting, based on the recommendations of the Staff Reports of April 10 and April 15. • There were no comments from the audience. MOTION: Butcher-Younghans moved, seconded by Thorfinnson, to close the Public Hearing; to approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Zoning District Change from C-Hwy to Office on 1.26 acres with variances to be reviewed by the board of Adjustments&Appeals; to adopt Resolution 98-85 for Preliminary Plat of 1.26 acres into 1 lot; and to direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations. Motion carried 5-0. VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Thorfinnson,to approve the Payment of Claims as submitted. Motion carried on a roll call vote,with Butcher-Younghans, Case, Thorfinnson,Tyra-Lukens and Harris voting "aye." VII. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS VIII. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. APPROVE LAYOUT PLAN FOR CSAH 1 FROM HENNEPIN TOWN ROAD TO TH 212,I.C. 5369 (Resolution 98-86) Jullie said staff from Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie have been working on this preliminary layout in preparation for the presentation to the public and City Council. An open house was held on March 19, 1998 to present the CSAH 1 layout to the public for review and comment. Based on the questions and comments received, the City sent out a memorandum responding to those 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 10 questions/comments and made some modifications to the Preliminary Layout. He said the preliminary estimate of project costs are in the $6 million range with federal funds covering approximately$3.26 million. There was a Council Workshop on April 21, 1998 to review issues identified at the open house. A second open house was held on May 4, 198 for review of the layout modifications. Gray reviewed the layout plan,noting the roadway will be expanded to four lanes with a median to assist with entrance and egress. It will incorporate trails along both sides to provide pedestrian service to the neighbors. He said many of the concerns expressed by the neighborhoods were for safety of entrance and egress, and he thought the protected turn lanes are the best way to address those concerns. Craig Twinem, Project Design Manager for Hennepin County, said this is an important component of Hennepin County's Transportation plan. He said they will begin development of the detailed layout and construction plans upon receiving approval of the Preliminary Layout. They changed the roadway alignment around Woodridge to Homeward Hills on the north side. They added a pedestrian trail crossing and have proposed traffic signals at Homeward Hills and Franlo and, after studying the intersection at Bennett Place, added a signal at that location. Based on public input, they added retaining walls at several locations to minimize the impact to trees and the adjacent properties. Thorfinnson asked if there have been any changes since the Council reviewed the layout two weeks ago. Twinem said the east end of the project was changed to add a left turn lane into the driveway at 10065. That driveway had been realigned as part of the reconstruction of Hwy 169. Gray noted the change was made at the request of the homeowner. Butcher-Younghans asked if there had been any progress on the different types of textures for the medians. Twinem said they would like to work with City Staff on that during the detailed design. Gray said there are some areas that would be wide enough to have turf on the median; however,the City would probably have to agree to maintain it. Butcher-Younghans asked if there are any low maintenance types of plantings available instead of grass. Gray said they could investigate that. Jim Mohr, 9750 Mill Creek Drive,was concerned because all of the access points do not have turn lanes. He said there are no load limits for this roadway, and people will drive it as a four-lane road. He would like to see a three-lane design that would limit heavy traffic. He was also concerned that there are no noise abatement plans. Twinem noted there is no separate right turn lane for the Mill Creek entrance. Mr. Mohr said that is a school bus stop. /0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 11 John Pastie, 9710 Mill Creek Road, said this is a huge project through a residential area. He was concerned about safety because it is difficult to make a left turn out onto Hwy 1 now, and it will be worse once it if widened. He said they have not had reasonable answers to their concerns. Gary Johnson, 10106 Juniper Lane, said the Council needs to drive down Pioneer Trail and ask themselves how wide it will be when it is done and how close it will come to existing houses. He thought there is too little regard for those who adjoin Pioneer Trail. He asked that this be considered an historic road preservation. Steve Andert, 9722 Purgatory Road, said his property is adjacent to the road. He is concerned about the increased traffic. He is opposed to urban sprawl and he thought this project will contribute to that condition. Janet Ford, 9720 Mill Creek Road, was concerned about safety issues with the dangerous entrance and exit conditions. She didn't think the concept takes the individual neighborhoods into consideration. Laurel Bluml, 10540 W. Riverview Drive, liked the idea of some of the improvements. She said we need to clear the trails during the winter and keep vehicles off the paths. She was concerned about the safety of non-vehicular traffic and about the intersection at Woodridge Drive. That intersection has short sight lines, and there is no signal planned for that location. She said the road will cut off access to the park off Woodridge Drive, and she was concerned that children will cross the highway to get to the park. She said we need law enforcement officers to address the issue of people driving on the paths in the vicinity of Pax Christi. Wesley Ford, 9720 Mill Creek Drive, thought the highway will not make it safer in any way. There is no right turn lane to get onto Mill Creek Drive. He thought it doesn't make sense to make a road harder to drive on. Harris noted that City Staff and the County representatives have listened to all of the residents' concerns. Tyra-Lukens asked what kind of refinements will have been done the next time we see this. Twinem said we will be developing the construction plans. Tyra-Lukens asked if we will see details such as the height and width of the retaining walls. Twinem said they will work with City Staff and the property owners involved. There are a lot of retaining walls on the layout and, if there are opportunities to further minimize impacts, they will do that; however, the next step would be the detailed construction plans. Gray said we will see more detail in terms of how the roadway interfaces with the adjoining properties. The concept will be the same but with much more detail. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 12 He said each individual property owner will become more aware of what is required. Tyra-Lukens asked if we will have any more information on noise abatement. Gray said the County could provide more information,but he would expect that, compared to the noise level out there today, there are some areas where noise will increase. The noise increase should be less than 3 decibels. It would be difficult to mitigate noise on this roadway. Twinem said there will be an environmental assessment document prepared that has to be approved by the Federal Highway Administration. There is one sensitive area by Sherman Drive where the existing noise is buffered by a berm that is located on the right-of-way that will be taken out during construction. They expect the noise level in that area to increase by about 6 decibels. They will take a look at that area in right-of-way negotiations. He thought there will be a significant amount of area that will experience a decrease in noise levels. Butcher-Younghans was concerned about the Mill Creek Drive entrance. She asked if there is some way the layout could be tweaked to make it safer at that location,perhaps by synchronizing the signal lights at Homeward Hills and Bennett Place so that people could get out of Mill Creek Drive. Gray thought the median will allow vehicles to clear the west-bound traffic and then wait for east-bound traffic to clear thereby making it easier to get out than it is now. He thought we could consider putting a right-turn lane off CSAH 1 into Mill Creek if there is a high right turn volume. Scott Ludwig, 9748 Mill Creek Drive, said there are 50 kids on the school bus when it stops, and they do not put the arm out because the traffic is coming so fast there it would cause an accident. He said the roadway will cause their neighborhood to be cut off from Eden Lake and Oak Point Schools. Harris noted this is the first step in a long process, and there will be additional opportunities for public input. We are just approving the concept tonight. Doris Dixon, 9710 Mill Creek Drive, thought it should be possible to make a better roadway without ruining neighborhoods along this stretch of road. Jullie noted the property owners will be talked to individually about the impact to their property. The right-of-way limits are not definitely established at this point, and Hennepin County will negotiate with each property owner as a matter of the process. Twinem noted there will be an opportunity for public comment as part of the environmental impact process. Tyra-Lukens asked how many additional times the Council will vote on this. Jullie said they will come back with the final construction plans. He said we have heard tonight that the Mill Creek intersection is a real concern, and he would CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 13 expect Staff and the County to address that in the next phase. Tyra-Lukens said she is looking to the landscaping as a way to retain the residential feeling. She didn't think it has to end up looking like a freeway. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to adopt Resolution 98-86 approving Preliminary Layout No. 3 for the CSAH 1 (Pioneer Trail) Improvements between Hennepin Town Road and TH 212. Motion carried 5-0. IX. REPORTS OF ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS A. ARTS COMMISSION- Strategic Planning Process Tria Mann, staff liaison for the Arts Commission, said the Arts Commission has met with a Consultant to review and revise their strategic plan. They would like Council direction as they continue to work on the plan. Tyra-Lukens asked if there is a fee for the process. Mann said it is $750 for the consultant's input. Tyra-Lukens asked if it was in the budget. Mann said it was. Harris thought the Commission is to be commended for following through on the Strategic Plan. She was pleased that there was attendance at the presentation of the values and goals to gather input. Thorfinnson thought there is nothing standing in the way of their planning, and it will help us in the process of deciding where we go from here. Butcher-Younghans noted she was on the Commission that developed the Strategic Plan, and it helped them to focus and plan. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Harris thanked the Commission for the update and encouraged them to pursue their strategic planning process, keeping in mind the City's overall vision and value statements. B. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS &APPEALS Request City Council to set June 2, 1998 to Review the Board of Adjustments &Appeals decision on Appeal #98-06 by Richard Haefele(fee owner) and Jennifer Coughlin(Solid Foundations Program Director), at 7170 Bryant Lake Drive. Jullie said on April 9, 1998, the Board of Adjustments &Appeals found the City Staffs conclusions outlined in the memo dated February 13, 1998 do support a case for abandonment of the duplex non-conforming use and determined the property at 7170 Bryant Lake Drive to be a single family non-conforming use. He said it would be appropriate to set a date to review the Board's decision. l CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 14 MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans,to set June 2, 1998 as the meeting to review the Board of Adjustments &Appeals decision on Appeal#98-06 by Richard Haefele and Jennifer Coughlin. Motion carried 5-0. C. SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION (Councilmember Nancy Tyra-Lukens) Tyra-Lukens said the hub construction is going on schedule. They have a final purchase agreement for the new bus garage at the old BFI-Reuters site on Hwy 62. X. APPOINTMENTS XI. REPORTS OF OFFICERS A. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS 1. REPORT ON CITY MANAGER'S APPOINTMENT (Councilmembers Ross Thorfinnson, Jr. and Ron Case) Thorfinnson said Councilmember Case and he have met with the Human Resources Director and Chris Enger to develop a City Manager's salary and benefit package for Mr. Enger. They recommend that Chris Enger be appointed as City Manager effective August 1, 1998 following the retirement of Carl Jullie and approval of the employment agreement. His salary would be $103,100 with a benefit package commensurate with that offered City employees. Thorfinnson noted they reviewed a lot of information including information from cities of similar size and the School District. Case said they found that in some cases cities had no agreements while others had formal agreements. They thought it was very appropriate to have a Letter of Understanding with Mr. Enger. Thorfinnson thought everything was covered in the letter,but if there are other questions or concerns Councilmembers should bring them up. Case noted they do not intend to revisit the letter every year. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans,to receive the report of Councilmembers Case and Thorfinnson and to execute the Letter of Understanding regarding the employment of Chris Enger as City Manager effective August 1, 1998. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Case moved, seconded by Butcher-Younghans, to authorize the Mayor to execute the letter of understanding at this time and to officially hire Chris Enger as City Manager effective August 1, 1998. /Lf CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 15 Motion carried 5-0. 2. REPORT ON SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE Case said we have been waiting for several years to hear from Paragon Cable that they are ready to begin a system upgrade. They will start with three other cities this year and will upgrade Minnetonka and Eden Prairie in 1999. They will install fiber optic cable throughout the city. There are no plans to offer modem access. He noted the public channels will be changing but,to avoid confusion, those numbers will be announced later. 3. SILT FENCES Butcher-Younghans said the NURP pond off Bennett and Pioneer Trail still has a construction fence around it,but the construction has been finished for a while. She wondered whose responsibility it is to remove that and if there might be other similar situations in the City. Jullie said Staff will check into it. Harris asked whether we charge the developer if the City takes the fence down. Jullie said we have had some success in getting the responsible parties to clear it up when we get out and identify the locations. 4. WATER ORDINANCE Tyra-Lukens said she has heard from residents with concerns about the water ordinance. They received a letter regarding the rules on watering that gave a number to call about a neighbor watering at the wrong time. The resident said she was unable to call after hours, and the Police Department referred her to Leslie Stavring's number. She then got voice mail at that number. Tyra-Lukens asked if we have a procedure to deal with that. She is concerned that people deliberately start watering on the wrong date because they know City Hall is closed. Jullie said he would need to follow up with the Engineering Staff and get back to the Council on this problem. Thorfinnson thought we might want to develop a separate line that is for the purpose of reporting infractions with a procedure to take the names and follow up with a letter to those people who are complained about. Jullie said Staff will review this and come back with recommendations. B. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER C. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS,RECREATION & NATURAL RESOURCES f CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 5, 1998 Page 16 D. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Award Contract for Installation of Temporary Traffic Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road,I.C. 97-5447 (Resolution) (Item deleted) 2. Approve Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MnDOT for Temporary Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road,I.C. 97-5447 (Resolution) (Item Deleted) 3. Resolution 98-89 Awarding Contract for 2" Bituminous Overlays,I.C. 98-5462 Gray said the low bid for the bituminous overlay contract was received from Valley Paving for$206,400. MOTION: Tyra-Lukens moved, seconded by Thorfinnson,to approve Resolution 98-89 awarding the contract for 2" bituminous overlays, I.C. 98-5462,to Valley Paving. Motion carried 5-0. F. REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY XII. OTHER BUSINESS XIII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Thorfinnson moved, seconded by Tyra-Lukens,to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harris adjourned the meeting at 10:55 p.m. /6 er3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: adCn SECTION: Consent Calendar May 19, 1998 prairies DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance - Gretchen Laven Clerk's License Application List IV.A. These licenses have been approved by the department heads responsible for the licensed activity. CONTRACTOR TEMPORARY LIQUOR ACCREDITED PLUMBING EDEN PRAIRIE LIONS CLUB ALDO INC (June 5,6,7 - Schooner Days) CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY CLEARWATER SYSTEMS D M S PLUMBING SERVICES INC GAMBLING DIVERSIFIED CONSTRUCTION HAGE CONSTRUCTION CO EDEN PRAIRIE LIONS CLUB-Bingo HULSEY CONSTRUCTION INC (June 5,6,7 - Schooner Days) OWENS SERVICES CORP P&D MECHANICAL CONTRACTING CO PAUL FALZ CO INC RAFFLE STATEWIDE GAS SERVICES INC TOTAL AIR INC LAKE MINNETONKA LODGE#6, TRI-G SERVICE INC FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE WILLETTE BUILDING CO (Staring Lake Outdoor Center July 9th) LAWN FERTILIZER APPLICATOR ENVIROLAWN May 19, 1998 1 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5/19/98 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO. i DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Facilities Management Fire Station#1 Barbara Cross RECOMMENDATION: City staff and fire department personnel recommend approving Boarman, Kroos, Pfister, Vogel& Associates (BKPV) to design the replacement for fire station#1. Once approved, staff will negotiate a contract with them and begin the design process immediately. BACKGROUND: City staff has been working with the fire department over the past year to select a site and to determine the needs for the new station. The Methodist Church site was identified as an excellent location with close proximity to the firefighters and the City Center. This location promoted the campus alliance and sharing of resources. The building committee and City staff were very disappointed to learn that the poor soils were too expensive to dig out and replace, and the time schedule too tight for surcharging. The building committee regrouped and revaluated sites. Two additional locations on the existing City Center property were investigated trying to eliminate the need to purchase expensive property and to minimize the time needed to negiotate a land purchase and closing. A station site near the existing City Center entrance was eliminated after determining traffic and the congestion would continue to be a problem along Mitchell Road. The site the City is proceeding with is an existing parking lot in the southwestern portion of the City Center site. The property is owned by the City and because it is adjacent to the Methodist Church site, it fits all of the criteria used in the original site selection. In discussions staff has had with C.H.Robinson to extend the terms of their lease, representatives have given permission to use the lot for a fire station to provided the parking places are replaced a location closer to their front door and site access is improved. Both of these items should be easily accomplished and has been included in the architects scope of work. A building program and a request for proposal were developed based on the work done by the building committee and City staff. Six RFP's were sent to architectural firms who have had experience designing fire stations. Two firms declined to submit stating they were smaller in size and could not complete the job in the time allotted. We received four proposals from firms who were interested in the project. Representatives from the fire department and City staff interviewed the four architectural firms. I The interview panel considered the following criteria to select one architectural firm: • past experience with fire stations (this information was critical due to the tight time schedule) • design approach • team members and technical expertise • ability to work with City personnel • availability to complete job within the proposed time frame • proposed fee FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The City received 1.4 million dollars from MNDOT for the existing building. This sum is not enough to cover replacement costs. The HRA needs to issue bonds to cover the architectural fees and additional costs that exceed the amount received for right of way acquisition. We plan to begin the formal process for issuance of the required bonds for the project financing at the June 2, 1998 Council and HRA meeting 2 May 13, 1998 • Section 1. General Information A. Objective The purpose for the Request For Proposal(RFP) is to obtain written proposals for professional services to design a new fire station and a parking structure to replace and enhance parking at the City Center. The proposed site is an existing parking lot for C.H. Robinson Corporation located in the southwest portion of the Eden Prairie City Center property on Scenic Heights Road. B. Contract Administration The RFP is issued on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie by the Facilities Department. All correspondence regarding this RFP must be addressed to: Barbara Cross City of Eden Prairie Facilities Department 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (612) 949-8444 The City of Eden Prairie reserves the right to award the total proposal, to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part, and to waive any informality or technical defects if, in the City's judgement,the City's best interest will be served. C. Incurring Costs The City of Eden Prairie is not liable for any cost incurred by prospective architects prior to the signing of a contract. D. Proposals To be considered, each firm must submit a complete response to this RFP,using the format provided in Section III. The proposal must be signed in ink by an official authorized to bind the submitter to its provisions. The proposal must remain valid for at least sixty(60) days from the due date. E. Acceptance of Proposal Content The contents of this RFP and the proposal will become contractual obligations, if a contract ensues. Failure of the selected consultant to accept these obligations may result in cancellation of the award. 1 , F. Selection Criteria Responses to this RFP will be evaluated based upon a two-step selection process. The first step will involve an evaluation of the following factors as presented in the submitter's proposal. The evaluation will be completed by a committee composed of Eden Prairie staff and Fire Department representatives. 1. Firm's Qualifications, Past Experiences, Design Approach and Fee Proposal a. Professional Qualifications The written proposals should indicate the: • Qualifications of the firm's personnel measured by education and experience specifically those persons that would be working on the project. • Identify and provide qualifications for any consultants that would be a part of the design team for major elements of the project, i.e. structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, landscape architecture etc. • Ability of the firm to meet the timetable identified for the project. b. Past Involvement With Similar Projects The written proposal should indicate the: • Firm's experience in designing and constructing similar fire stations, parking structures and other public buildings of this scale; • Firm's experience in working with neighborhood/committee input on project design. c. Statement of Process Design Approach • The written proposal must discuss the design approach or concepts which would be pursued, for this project. Firms must consider the work statement (Section II) and facility program elements in their design approach. d. Fee Quotation Provide a fee proposal that is based on an hourly fee with a not-to-exceed amount. Submit only one copy of the fee quotation in a separate envelope clearly labeled: Firm Name, Fee Proposal for the Fire Station#1. Provide hourly charges for direct labor, the amount of overhead and any fixed fees that would be associated with the project. For evaluation and billing purposes, the firm shall allocate a percentage of the total fee to the following phases: • schematic/scoping design process • design development • construction documents • bidding phase • construction observation/contract administration 2 e. Performance and Cost Containment • Firms past performance in delivering design services and completed building on time and on budget. The selection committee will review and screen the initial submittals, and then invite selected firms to interview and present a more detailed proposal. • 2. Interview a. Interview Selected firms will be given the opportunity to discuss, in more detail, their qualifications, past experience with similar public projects and their proposed design approach. The selection committee will recommend their choice to the City Manager and will present the recommendation to the Eden Prairie City Council who will make the final consultant selection for the project. G. Sealed Proposal Receipt Five (5) copies of the proposal must arrive at the Information Desk at the Eden Prairie City Center, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 on or before 4:00 pm, Friday May 8, 1998. Oral interviews wil be held the week of May 12th. Council approval of the selected consultant is planned for May 19, 1998. Late proposals will not be considered or accepted. Section II. Work Statement. Scope of Services An existing parking lot has been identified as the best site for the relocation of our main administrative fire station. Replacing the parking displaced by the building and circulation needed to support the fire trucks will be required. Redesigning the site to provide as much at grade parking will be the first priority. Designing a parking structure to accommodate the balance of lost spaces and enhance the existing parking needs at the City Center without compromising the buildings visual integrity will be critical. The City of Eden Prairie is seeking a qualified consultant to provide services for the development of site master plan, fire station design, parking structure designs and preparation of bidding documents for building construction and site development. The City of Eden Prairie and Fire Department personnel recently completed a space planning study for the proposed station. Part of the document has been attached to this proposal. A complete document is available for review at the Information Desk in the Eden Prairie City Center. The estimated construction budget for the fire station is $2,700,000 The estimated construction budget for the parking structure is $1,600,000. This allowance does include general sitework, building services (sewer, water, electrical), consultant fees, furnishings and contingency. All plans and specifications must receive the required approvals from the City of Eden Prairie and any/all permits/reviews in accordance with the building code and regulations for buildings of this type and size. 3 • Scope of Services 1. Basic Services - Schematic Design Phase a. The Architect shall review the program furnished by the City to ascertain the • requirements of the project and shall finalize and confirm such requirements to the City. b. Based upon the program, the Architect shall prepare several preliminary schematic design studies for site and fire station and parking structure. Drawings will include site plans, floor plans, building elevation and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of project components for approval by the City. c. The Architect shall submit to the City a statement of probable construction costs based on conceptual studies and plans. d. The Architect shall participate in meetings and work sessions as may be required with City staff, committees and boards. e. The Architect shall develop a master project schedule incorporating design and construction process and the user. 2. Basic Services - Design Development Phase a. The Architect shall prepare a design(incorporating the best ideas from the approved schematic design studies) for approval by the City, the design development documents/ drawings will consist of site plans, floor plans, building elevations and sections and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the entire project as to civil, structural,mechanical and electrical systems, materials and such other essentials as may be appropriate. b. The Architect shall submit to the City an updated estimate of construction costs. c. The Architect shall participate in meetings and work sessions as may be required with City staff, committees and boards. d. The Architect shall refine construction schedule and construction phasing, mediating needs of construction with building occupants. 3. Basic Services- Construction Documents Phase a. The Architect will prepare construction drawings and specifications, setting forth in detail the requirements for construction, including the necessary bidding information, bidding forms, the conditions of the contract and the form of agreement between the City and the Contractor and other documents complete and ready for submission to bidders. 4 b. The Architect will advise the City of any adjustments to previous statements for probable construction costs. c. The Architect will assist the City in filing the required documents for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project. 4. Bidding Phase a. The Architect will prepare the advertisement for bids, issue drawings and specifications to bidders, clarify questions by addenda during the bidding period, direct bidders conference, analyze bids received, recommend contract award, and assist in preparing contract documents for contracts awarded. 5. Construction Phase - Adminstration Of The Construction Project a. The construction phase will commence with the award of the construction contract and will terminate when the final certificate for payment is issued to the City. b. The Architect, as representative of the City during the construction phase, will advise and consult with the City and all of the City's instructions to the contractor will be issued through the Architect. c. The Architect and/or consultants working on the design team will make periodic visits to the site to familiarize themselves generally with the progress and quality of the work and to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. d. Based on such observations at the site and on the Contractor's applications for payment, the Architect will determine the amount owing to the Contractor and will issue certificates for payment in such amounts, the issuance of a certificate for payment will constitute a representation by the Architect to the City, based on the Architect's observations at the site and the data comprising the application for payment, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, and to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information, and belief, the quality of the work is in accordance with the contract documents. e. The Architect will be, in the first instance, the interpreter of the requirements of the contract documents. f. The Architect will have authority to reject work which does not conform to the contract documents. g. The Architect will review and approve shop drawings, samples, and other submissions of the contractor. h. The Architect will prepare change orders. 7 5 i. The Architect will conduct inspections to determine the dates of substantial completion and final completion, will receive and review written guarantees and related documents assembled by the Contractor, and will issue a final certificate for payment. • j. The Architect shall submit one set of as built drawings to the City upon completion of the project. 6. Architect's Records, Documents and Insurance a. The Architect shall maintain time records, calculations and research notes in legible form and they will be made available to the City if requested. b. The City shall have full rights to reproduce works under this agreement either in whole or in part. The architect shall furnish owner with electronic files and one copy of each drawing in reproducible form. c. The Architect shall carry insurance to protect him from all claims under workmen's compensation acts; from claims for damages because of bodily injury including death to his employees and the public, from claims for property damage and professional liability (ocurrance form)protecting the Architect and its employees up to an amount of not less than$500,000.00. 7. Additional Services The Architect may provide, if specifically requested and authorized by the City, additional services not covered in previous paragraphs. General Comments Related to Scope of Work • The City will make available all pertinent existing data related to the project, including: maps, site surveys and drawings, access to the site during normal hours or at other times as arranged, designation of a project representative who will be the contact for all primary communications with the architect. • Close coordination with the Building and Inspections Department for code compliance. • Close coordination with the Development Review Committee Staff for a site plan review process that will include presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council at approximately the 75% plan completion stage. • Close coordination with NSP to develop an energy efficient facility and to explore NSP funded conservation programs. 6 • • The Consultant shall evaluate the feasibility and/or desirability of moving specialty equipment from the existing fire station to the new site. • The Consultant shall evaluate the feasibility and/or desirability of using • existing Energy Management System at the City Center to control building functions at fire station. • The building design shall include all interior fixtures, signage, etc., for a complete, useable structure, special attention will be given to material selections for their durability and compatibility with ongoing custodial maintenance. • The building will require a fire alarm system--to be monitored at the Eden Prairie Police Department. • The building will be designed to include cable, conduits and chaseways for future installation of electronic technology. • The telephone system shall be designed for compatibility with the City Hall system. Proposed Timetable 1. RFP Submittal Deadline May 8, 1998 at 4:00 pm 2. Interviews Week of May 12th, 1998 3. Manager recommends Consultant to City of Eden Prairie City Council. May 19, 1998 4. Consultant receives project input from City of Eden Prairie and commences design phase. May 20, 1998 5. City of Eden Prairie approves preliminary building design, site work and cost estimates and consultant commences construction document phase. June 12, 1998 6. City of Eden Prairie approves final design phase and cost estimates, consultant commences construction document phase. June 26, 1998 7. Consultant concludes construction document phase and advertisement for bids placed. July 20, 1998 8. City of Eden Prairie City Council awards bid. August 4, 1998 L1 7 9. Apparatus floor substantially complete for occupancy. November 15, 1998 10. Final completion of project. June 1, 1999 Section III. Information Required From All Proposal Submitters A. Professional Qualifications 1. State the full name and address of your organization, and, if possible, the branch office or other subordinate element that will perform, or assist in performing the work hereunder. Indicate whether it operates as an individual, partnership, or corporation; if as a corporation, include the state in which it is incorporated. If appropriate, state whether it is licensed to operate in the State of Minnesota. 2. Manpower. Include the number of executive and professional personnel by skill and qualification that will be employed in the work. Show where these personnel will be physically located during the time they are engaged in the work. Indicate which of these individuals you consider key to the successful completion of the study or project. Identify individuals by name and title who will do the work on this project. Resumes or qualifications are required for proposed project personnel. 3. State history of the firm, in terms of length of existence, etc. B. Past Involvement With Similar Projects List specific types of experience your firm has had in the following areas: 1. Design and construction of similar fire stations. 2. Design and construction of parking structures. 3. Site master plans and circulation studies with multiple users. 4. Experience in working with a team involving fire department personnel supervisors and managers in a public environment. 5. Specific examples of maintaining schedules for projects of similar complexity. 6. Firm history on project completion within budget. /6 8 C. Brief Statement of Design Approach Submit written narrative of the design concepts and approach which you may utilize for the project. Further, this narrative could be supported by sketches or graphic material that would illustrate alternative approaches which may be considered for the project, as you feel are necessary at this stage of involvement (optional). D. Authorized Negotiator/Expeditor Include: the name and phone number of person(s) in your organization authorized to negotiate/expedite the proposed contract with the City of Eden Prairie. E. Additional Information and Comments Include any other information that is believed to be pertinent but not specifically asked for elsewhere. G. Form of Agreement The Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect (MA Document B141) will be used with changes, amendments and additions described in Attachment A. One copy of the proposal must be received at the following address on or before May 8, 1998 at 4:00 pm. City of Eden Prairie Department of Facilities 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (612) 949-8444 c:barb\barb\rfpfire II 9 Architect Evaluation Summary for the replacement of Fire Station#1 May 14, 1998 1. Firm Experience with Similar Work (Were the examples of work comparable to our project?) 2. Experience of Project Manager (What experience does the proposed project manager have with similar projects? Will the person work well with the Fire Department and City Staff?) 3. Understanding of our Project. (How much did they know about the circumstances of our City? How much home work have they done on our specific project and site?) 4. Design Approach and Process. (Will they be able to dael with angry neighbors, direction from staff and the fire department, coordinate schedules, and find creative ways to keep the project moving and within the budget? 5. Technical Qualifications What disciplines will be represented? Architects Landscapre Architects Cost Engineers ElectricalEngineers Interrior Designers Mechanical Engineers Structural Engineers Specification Writers Site planners Do they have expertise in code issues, life cycle costs energy efficiency etc? 6. Project Importance. Does the job seem to be improtant to the firm? Will the enthusiam carry over to the end of the job? 7. Proposed Fee. Fee proposals will be opened after the interviews 8. Impressions/Other 1A Project Team CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE City Management Fire Department BKPV Principal In Charge David R. Kroos, AIA BKPV Project Manager Paul Mickelberg AIA BKPV TEAM MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ADMINISTRATOR Lance Duane Jon Kempf,P.E. Dave Booty,P.E. Thorpe,P.E. RaII,CSI COST ESTIMATING LANDSCAPE CIVIL TRAFFIC ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING Bill Wolters Damon Farber Schoell & Barton-Ashman Madson BOARMAN v KROOS YPFISTER v VOGEL & ASSOCIATES 13 V B. Past Involvement With Similar Projects 1. Design and construction of similar fire stations. • Following you will find project sheets which are representative of our experience with fire station design. Fire Station Project Experience Minneapolis Fire Station#27 Minneapolis Fire Station#28 New Fire Station New Fire Station Minneapolis,Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Bloomington Fire Station Chanhassen Fire Station Addition to Station#3, New Station#1 New Facility Bloomington,Minnesota Chanhassen, Minnesota ? Minnetonka Fire Station 01 Belle Plaine Fire Station New Facilities Prototype Design New Facility Minnetonka,Minnesota Belle Plaine, Minnesota Plymouth Fire Station New Prague Fire Station New Facility Main Station Remodeling Main Station Plymouth,MInnesota New Prague, Minnesota Maple Grove Fire Station Little Canada Fire Station Remodeling New Facility Main Station Maple Grove,Minnesota Little Canada, Minnesota Champlin Fire Station Richfield Public Safety Addition&Remodeling Master Plan/Study Champlin.Minnesota Richfield, Minnesota Prior Lake Fire Station Lakejohanna Fire Station New Main Fire Station New Facility Station Prior Lake, Minnesota North Oaks, Mlnnesota Fridley Fire Station Ramsey Fire Station Remodeling Study for Main Station and Satellite Fridley, Minnesota Ramsey, Minnesota Golden Valley Public Safety New Ulm Fire Station Addition and Remodeling Addition and Remodeling Golden Valley, Minnesota New Ulm,Minnesota BOARMAN "v KROOS ' PFISTER v VOGEL & ASSOCIATES 1if V Fire Station #28 Minneapolis, Minnesota l r : -0 111 " & ri i\ -p �T7T�1iv ,n °m woo.�.°.r °m°o°.�m -g i iv uT — li I — 1 I ,L; I t f,,l', ii,r i? y, i- t. _ Located at the intersection of a quiet residential street and a busy thoroughfare,this 12,500 sf structure uses several design features to blend the building into the neighbor- hood while maintaining functionality and safety. Apparatus bays face a busy street but are located away from the intersection to allow maneuvering space for the ladder truck. Living quarters wrap around the corner and are bordered by a collonaded veranda. A courtyard provides outdoor living space overlooking Upton Avenue. Pitched roof forms and brick exterior with white trim complete the neighborhood feeling to the station. A rusticated,precast concrete base anchors the building and gives it a permanent and lasting presence within the community. BOARMAN v KROOS ' PFISTER v VOGEL & ASSOCIATES V Plymouth Fire Station Plymouth, Minnesota 1 - ry t _ v,,- .ram ,E}1��,`y,kf'.�,s.c-af.�J'--, - L III" I' ''Llil.1 - - 1 ,.71,- 'I�„oliy .., C�,' y of f F 1? " rob .µS, Y _. tea' �4.-: ' l�. . - 1 L ,a.// t ::I WOMEN .....„.... 102 - ,‘„, ,_ ... - 11 1 i _ 'J......-.: / ...... ....==_.=. - Eli,. _ , UNITIMOMI OPIM —— fin{ !1/IU//1141Np'. NOMA � / u C. r. .. "°e' I wpm Ca IRR!/ �_ . s Al r1 0 MI 'I ill \IBIlL -II This 18,500 square foot facility houses operational functions including apparatus bays, communication room,breathing equipment room,and hose room,and central adminis- trative and training functions. The training room,which is also used as the community meeting room,overlooks the wetland to the southeast. One of the most important issues of the design was the desire to bring large amounts of natural light into a building that is typically a dark and enclosed environment. This was done through the extensive use of continuous glazing around the building. /t) V Prior Lake Fire Station ,; ,;--s, *' - _ Prior Lake, Minnesota - i4 ,..- • • y. v i Lei n'sk-` ♦: — Q —IL - Ste ;T ♦ _ 1 _ - t i ;K xiw v ,4 scar Is'y"._ • -t: . . _1 _ Eli ig ____ ......0 _..."..... _____._,,,„..., ___ _ . .,..........„.„.. ., ___ A . i , . ______ , : : ii.i.7: w' it: -. s4' Y 14-; i ' x '+n�i f 35`° BKPV was retained by the City of Prior Lake to complete a Comprehensive Needs Assessment for the City Hall. Police. and the Fire Department for their current 5. 10. and 15 year space projections. B.CrA-RNtAt4. F K.RQaS FFISTER IP va-GEL &: A-SSOCIATES II Eden Prairie Fire Station and Parking Ramp Basis for Compensation Fee Proposal • As a service firm, Boarman Kroos Pfister Vogel & Associates is compensated on an hourly basis for a not-to-exceed fixed fee maximum. Therefore,the designer is compensated on the basis of service invested in the project work. Hourly Rates Project Principal $97-128 Interior Designer $38-72 Project Manager $66-76 Engineering $46-88 Project Architect $42-70 Construction Administration $70 Architectural Design Services for Implementation The Architect's fee for basic services for the construction of the new Eden Prairie Fire Station is based on 7.5% of the cost of construction and the parking ramp is based on 5% of the cost of construction. This percentage fee would also apply to furniture and equipment included in the Architect's workscope. Compensation is on an hourly basis for a not-to-exceed fixed fee maximum. Workscope 1.Program Confirmation 2. Schematic Design 3. Design Development 4. Construction Documents 5. Bidding/Negotiations 6. Construction Phase Note It is our understanding that the new Fire Station construction may commence in two phases, the first of which is to complete the apparatus bays, the second phase would complete the remainder of the Fire Station and parking ramp. Additional Expenses Additional services, if requested will be billed at standard hourly rates. Reimbursable Expenses Expenses of prints, mylars, reproductions, postage and travel shall be billed at cost to the client. BOARMAN • KROOS • PFISTER • VOGEL & ASSOCIATES 12 DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TTEM NO: ly C SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Office Ridge Circle Randy Slick Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Office Ridge Circle subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$284.28 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$535.00 • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Prior to release of the fmal plat, Developer shall submit a trail easement for review and written approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Background: This plat, located at the southwest corner of Valley View Road and Office Ridge Circle, consists of replatting Outlot A(2.76 acres) of Extended Stay America into one lot for construction of an office building. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council April 7, 1998. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on May 19, 1998. RS:ssa cc: Joseph Ryan, Oppidan, Inc. Paul Thorp, HTPO, Inc. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE WHEREAS, the plat of Office Ridge Circle has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Office Ridge Circle is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated April 27, 1998. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Donald R. Uram, Clerk 2 1 t_.,, h1 � If % I II TN R.T. DOC. NO, • • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; Thel OPPldan Inc.,o Minn•aola Corpwalk••,lee owsr of lb.Iolcwing d•acrlbed V p y etual.d M aeeerlb.d In en.Ca y 1 Hen epM,State al MMn.eelo,Lo Mt. Mllot A,EXTENDED STAY AMFRICA t OTI CICLE aM lnla note sod deNcal.Ie he Public dlOrn Public use Iorvve�Nedbolno ge land uIIIIIYFwa<menta aRs Mow w hplaty n witness whereof sold REPIGan Inc.,has owned meae presents to be signed by Il �.1 iti E/j'I•'j of 199� a Proper orrkr tnh_day \;,,h,_u" • 9.✓• t,..10 .g9KYgTD' SIGNE. OPPOAN wc. Its i'1 \ .NP'SA'09 A.A•/e'Do S. v T n er' T Et G.ors• a3�g0 �. —,\ g 70 r:��)•/"�I ,�,,�,r bq0 `� j/-� STATE OF MINNESOTA I % ,/, ``�•� • SZOroA'21'E F.282 UN EpSEMEN 22,\ Z Lli couNry of `��/• &00 pND uN �� �'` A ` A 1Na loregolnq IneirNment vas acknowledged before nu.Nb say of ,, ` ST�`. ORp1NA I— '. • j 8 I.Li v c99_.by Ina VI q1 ' 3603 / 1 �r I `f OpfulaanInc.,el Minnesota CerporatIon,on banal el vela ageratlon. '96. 664° sver County.MhncwleJ,L.M.TEL IUsTd-_ NMotacrymPulbkon—,..s�, 022 ----- --,,a; Z :~- I (1-:` lLA I-- • LOT 1 :7. I h. aye as ecrOed e a 5 at !_' Tole`hereby ...dry that n talb of and y. one • n ono .Gown on CIRCLE;In to IA p o Frt al um a e that all ly one d r nlo eased In teal and �` hot the o or a leap Ihal ne monument.onto hove teen<a,on eo Places and t ground f OS shown on cla 1 �li Gnat me wtalae boundary IMa.an a ur designated an veld plat: a that mere ere no wauanaa.as gd I BLOCK `y, defined M MS 505.02.Subd. ,w public highways to be deeds/no eI said plat. v c�^` -r/ A*l:J ' j Minn<ota Licensen 13637 eyor E `-+i� ( lr .// A.1 C. \ STATE OF M NESOTA �<'` \.'� / c COUNTY OF IN Y l' e1 uc. £l• 1 / / Ti.bregeln9 EbILL eI99rll—'tbw Pouf' Thery.lend Su me In au of � ( -;.IAe - \,..---- Y rvryor,IMlmewta Lkeaae No.11B3T. •1 (�/ A( / j ` 'O �T�wi` NolaPUEIk. County.Mmnewlb • • i '�1 A `�`^ W / � My mlvelDn evp4ea ^) / c n8 �( 1 t`rt y 4�OO8ww�p�11 '� 2R" 1. / 4(r' EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA • '� '� �'4' ', OI r(' ` Tills Plot of OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE was approved end accepted by.the CNY...nett el Eew Pralrh,u ▪/J % �7 it, ,, oO L1. �J • at �>y alarm ling msrwf ntd my. Y of log _11 r Ck.ve $111 \I / 1 appllaebl.,IN Mow commm one r eommendnllwa of the Commb•lenr W iF�eP tnN^^and the N _ �- ( �rl w 11j County Highway Engineer have corgi celved by e'CityyN the „hrbed 30 dO oa...teed wheat Ill/IL' 1 col i( `` ,`. receipt of such comment*anabi endauons,o provided by le . Stet y .Swum SW.03.subs z. / \ 58813.30eE 304,99 yOAo V1 r\ `"V1,L CITY COUNCIL OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA N o .____ -— - -_- _- •\Dy\Mr f A.'1 Tw , ��r' By Mara <Y.„)% er Manager no ,, I F .x.TI_I`If II-I) CST� ' Ai•1'1.--';?;/• A ' ���t City V.-/I,-•-/ ./-\ T' /-\t V I . j\//-\ f-%• V TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION.HENNEPIN COUNTY.MINNESOTw N \ �, I 1. rtify m t teas petal:.N11.7...., e D Years have bow pola for the lava d..eb.d S.Nh plol.re poles mlv D one 99_� y POtrIck H.O'Connor.Hennepin County Audited. By D.p,rly a c .��.N — SURVEY SUR VEY SECTION.HENNEDIN COUNTY.MINNESOTA day lto Mtn Statutes.SectIon.3:313.56S 99Je65(t gfigj. w Pal .been approved m.Cory F.CaawMl,Nwnpb.Coun1Y SuT.yer By DRNNADE AND UTIUTY EASDIENTS ARE SHOWN THUS REGISTRAR OF TITLES,HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA I hereby cortlly that the within Plot of OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE woe ITea for record In this oTllce tills —� 0 THE 8/51S OF BEARINGS IS ASSUMED o'clock day efM INN at e_I J_ O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT R.Dan Carlson,Registrar el TIll.. By Deputy L -- _1 _-L SmU h Toot Y 0 30 100 130 g ri BEINO 0 FEET IN YAWN AND ADJOINING LOT UNES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING 111 Hflneen TTIOrp RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES,AS SHOWN ON THE PUT _L71 PDlllnen Olson Inc. 1 L ow„ee,e.....a..r.A w.r.w SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Final Plat Approval of Maple Addition Randy Slick Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution approving the final plat of Maple Addition subject to the following conditions: • Receipt of engineering fee in the amount of$260.00 • Receipt of street lighting fee in the amount of$856.00 • Receipt of street sign fee in the amount of$560.75 • Satisfaction of bonding requirements for the installation of public improvements • Execution of Special Assessment Agreement for trunk utility improvements • The requirements as set forth in the Developer's Agreement • Revision of street name • Revision of plat name on dedication sheet Background: This plat, located off of West Staring Lane, consists of 3.64 acres to be divided into six (6) single family lots and right-of-way dedication for street purposes. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council March 17, 1998. Second Reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and final approval of the Developer's Agreement was completed on April 21, 1998. RS:ssa cc: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MAPLE ADDITION WHEREAS, the plat of Maple Addition has been submitted in a manner required for platting land under the Eden Prairie Ordinance Code and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City of Eden Prairie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL: A. Plat approval request for Maple Addition is approved upon compliance with the recommendation of the City Engineer's report on this plat dated May 5, 1998. B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the owners and subdividers of the above named plat. C. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the foregoing provisions. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Donald R. Uram, Clerk VICINITY MAP ]'44_pJj _ 7 n �]1 TTT'1 . T 1 (Nden Prairie, MN) l NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ! QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP \ I �� 116,RANGE 22.HENNIPEN COUNTY, ... .. \ f,\ MINNESOTA `\. .'.•i:;'::,_ :;'1...,9(DEED) I \ bC't:04 ,A, 12%3,20(YEAS.) ld 3.1 78.61 • . e 1 ;. \.„ SI rr �/ O �, I I' �� , .mil r Il y / I I 1`-� • `:6,:i v. . 1 1`�' o PrOMECR THE'/i ifl ' , ,el o I.UT 5 .' S1AIE Nam.in lA. _� i h0 1 bT•pG�U o w K GG I I u,NN. N . i • .p•\ 11 ¢ O V e.1 I , -`y ry�`T•j�v � •1 ,� I j{ '1 io C• . I I ..• ,:\b \ ^ NO SCALE N I -J, .• ry0. N GRAPHIC SCALE L,e '" 1 ,7"1;, '" a0os't' .-. 3na: W ''•'P.S..W + m O - -- / __._ _._._— �. ( fl.W ,•W l , -tAA.5 I.:INCH YIN . (1K rI.ET) ,.. — n!O y' ; ' . 3J C:A ..i. 1 „�4 0. I SCALD 1 D.CH W YtiF7 ••••• •• ••• V, N�'4y:1• I II , i ♦ :. 1. _... "i`, LOT a r, .501'70'25•W 30.0(UEED) Y' ..... u 0�.. //e'yu .-' 7'1 r I . 7, \\`.TKO GJ. /r e.; / I.. 1GE,TID -I . "'6b,,-5. O DENOTES 1;'2 INCH BY la INCH 16011 PIPE ,^I ro:�Wi. ,,,08--,--o;'Al / 4 SET AND MARKED R.L.S. NO. 23300 ', a �'lf, • :. ,ln • DENOTES FOUND IRON OR MONUMENT I `J c .1yf ", ,,o, -/ (S2E, TYPE, AND R.L.S.NO. AS NOTED I a,°j • S a9, o`v y,1/rr' ON DRAWING) i r Er.,,,-,' ...-• '�.l.` �'000 0FO':' ?:,7, OB.E' Y/ N / (PLAT) DENOTES RECORDED PLAT DISTANCE I . 30 'O ::'I': / (DEED) DENOTES DEEDED DISTANCE I `/1 ' 1//-)1 1 S 531V.(,r to,I I v y//. / (YEAS.) DENOTES 41EASURED DISTANCE - ••. / / % _ /�v / / BASIS OF BEARINGS: FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARK / `` - /z O / ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS /''3 J�•�, � - / IN BASED UPON HENNIPEN COUNTY COORDINATES, /. 73'J •1-` - / 41 NORTH AMEHICAN DATUM OF 1983. •/ ?3'32' K '.a11.a / 7 N 70(DEED W • A 'a0.j39.63/(A1C• 4$,) �� IT',I. 30700.1 .0(UEED) DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: FOUND JUOiC:A_LANDMARK---- 5 �I 60 `-P.0.8. I CEFiTERLII.E OF;TANRISG'ANE___ \.L / + DOG. NO. 3050858 i rj H5 .... y W oQ. I o ,v 4, NORTHWEST CORNER OF S?ARHSTARRING,:.,NEE /n A, -1- _. I _ 1. — _. NORTHWEST FIRST ADDiT1011 (J.L.M.)- _ ' ( ;-----.• 2 If BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. / `7. AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN W10TH, UNLESS /' OTHERWISE II:DITATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES % AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. / • 3U.I 7(DEED) / LUT . / , / „ / / SHEET 2 OF 2 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 05/19/98 SECTION: Consent Calendar ITEM NO: �1/ E DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works NSP Service Agreement Eugene A. Dietz Lighting on Dell Road Requested Action: Approve motion authorizing Director of Public Works to contract with NSP to provide 24 street lights on Dell Road at an estimated cost of$80,345.00. Background/Financial Considerations: NSP has provided cost estimates for installing street lighting on two segments of Dell Road generally between Pioneer Trail and TH 5. In recent years, we have had two choices on the mechanism for contracting for these installations: • NSP owns and operates the system and the City pays $24.30 for each fixture per month plus any extraordinary installation costs(rate pays electric,maintenance and fixture cost). • NSP owns and operates the system and the City pays $8.50 per month per fixture and all initial costs for the installation of the system(rate pays for electrical and maintenance only). In new subdivisions,the developer most often pays minor installation costs because the entire subdivision is installed at one time and consequently many of our fixtures are at the $24.30 per month rate. However, on these Dell Road projects, there would be extraordinary costs for the lease rate installation. The table below shows a 20-year present worth analysis for the 24 street lights. Lease Rate Purchase Option (Group V) Initial Installation cost $43,840.00 $80,345.00 by City Present Worth - ($24.30*/mo.) (12 months) ($8.50*/mo.) (12 months) Monthly Rate (24 lights) (11.47**) _ (24 lights) (11.47**) = $80,272 $28,079 TOTAL Present Worth $124,112.00 $108,424.00 * Service rate to NSP (assumes no inflation for analysis) ** Present worth factor for 20 years at 6% interest rate As noted in the table, the present worth of the purchase option is$15,000 less. Additionally, the annual reductions in monthly billings is approximately $4,550 for the purchase option. Staff recommends authorizing the purchase option for the street lighting installation. The estimated initial cost of $80,345.00 would be paid through a debit from our settlement agreement with NSP. 01 Northern States Power Company RSIP Edina Area 5309 West 70th Street Edina, Minnesota 55439-2002 Telephone(612)829-4500 April 28, 1998 Jim Richardson City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Jim: We are pleased to provide cost estimates for 2 new street light projects on Dell Road. Both projects were estimated using 250 watt high pressure sodium rectilinear fixtures mounted on 30' fiberglass direct buried poles. The first project calls for the installation of 13 poles between Big Woods Lane and Linwood Court. Under the leasing rate option, where the capital and installation costs are built into the rate, the excess construction costs will be $21,871 and the monthly rate per unit will be $24.30. Under the Purchase Option - Group 5, whereby the capital and installation costs are paid up-front to receive a lower monthly rate, the installation costs will be $41,040 and the monthly rate per unit will be $8.50. The second project calls for the installation of 11 poles between Wexford Drive and Pioneer Trail. Under the leasing rate option the excess construction costs will be $21,969 with a monthly rate per unit of$24.30. The Purchase Option - Group 5 up- front cost is $39,305 and the monthly rate per unit will be $8.50. Per our recent discussion I am also submitting one Group 5 contract for the two projects under the assumption that is the option you may choose. If that is not the case, or if changes must be made, we can prepare new contracts. Thank you for this new business opportunity. Please contact me at 829-4504 if any questions arise. Sincerely, : �� 7-7144-e---,___ Stuart Fraser • Community Services Manager cc: Dan Maurer Z STATEMENT OF WORK REQUESTED Forth 17-7012(12.81) RISP Northern States Power Company APRIL 28 19 98 WORK REQUESTED BY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE - ATTN: JIM RICHARDSON WORK TO BE AT 8800 DELL ROAD AND 8975 DELL ROAD ADDRESS 8080 MITCHELL RD. EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONSISTING OF: INSTALLATION OF 24-250 WATT HPS RECTILINEAR CUT-OFF ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTS MOUNTED ON 30' FIBERGLASS POLES. THIS IS TO BE A PURCHASE OPTION(GROUP 5)PROJECT. CHARGE TO T PROJECT: 17-639 "THE COSTS OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE APPLIED AS A CREDIT AGAINST THE FUNDS SET ASIDE AS A SETTLEMENT OF THE 1980 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT CONTRACT ISSUE. The facilities installed or removed by the Company shall be the property of the Company and any payment by customer shall not entitle customer to any ownership interest or right therein. The undersigned hereby requests and authorizes the NORTHERN STATES COMPANY to do the work described described above, and in consideration thereof, agrees to pay EIGHTY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY FIVE& uu 9 UU ($ 80,345.00 ), in accordance with the following terms: Credit Approval Receipt of the above amount hereby acknowledged on behalf of NSP by NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Customer CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By By * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NSP Representative S. E. FRASER Division EDINA NSP Proj. No. STLGEDPBAF/751683 I LCitUF'UAY/b/94bb Const. $ Rem. $ Maint. $ Oper. $ Transf. $ Total $ 0.00 ORIGINAL-DIVISION ACCOUNTING COPY-CUSTOMER COPY-DIVISION DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: j F SECTION: Consent Calendar 7 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Works NSP Service Agreement Eugene A. Die Street Lighting on Eden Prairie Road -- Pioneer Trail to Terrey Pine Drive Recommended Action: Approve motion authorizing Director of Public Works to contract with NSP for construction of 50 street lights on Eden Prairie Road at an estimated cost of$100,900. Background/Financial Considerations: In conjunction with the Hennepin County contract to reconstruct Eden Prairie Road, NSP is burying the overhead power lines in the corridor. Currently, street lighting in the corridor is limited to a few ligh$mounted on existing power poles. Since NSP is doing extensive work in the corridor, we have asked them for an estimated cost to provide a level of lighting similar to other four-lane roadway lighting that we have in the community. The result is a very favorable price for the 50 street lights that would be constructed. The source of funding to pay for these lights would be from the NSP settlement agreement. Staff recommends approval of the motion. 1 /AV Northern States Power Company MIP Edina Area 5309 West 70th Street Edina,Minnesota 55439-2002 Telephone (612)829-4500 May 12, 1998 City of Eden Prairie ATTN: Jim Richardson 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Jim: Enclosed are three copies of the Statement of Work Requested form and three copies of the Underground Service Form for the street lighting project on County Road 4 between Pioneer Trail and Terry Pine Dr. Please sign all three copies of each form and return everything to me. I will forward to you the completed copy of these agreements once the appropriate NSP signature has been obtained. In the meantime, should you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, 7/144-e2, Stuart Fraser Community Services Manager (612) 829-4504 Enclosures STATEMENT OF WORK REQUESTED Form 17.7012(12-81) INSP Northern States Power Company MAY 12 19 98 WORK REQUESTED BY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ATTN: JIM RICHARDSON WORK TO BE AT CO. RD.4 - PIONEER TRAIL TO TERRY PINE DR. ADDRESS 8080 MITCHELL RD. EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONSISTING OF: INSTALLATION OF 50-250 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM RECTILINEAR STREET LIGHTS MOUNTED ON 30' FIBERGLASS DIRECT BURIED POLES AND INSTALLED UNDER THE GROUP 5 OPTION. CITY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRENCH RESTORATION. ** THE ACTUAL COSTS OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE APPLIED AS A CREDIT AGAINST THE FUNDS SET ASIDE AS A SETTLEMENT OF THE 1980 DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT CONTRACT ISSUE: T-PROJECT: 17-639 The facilities installed or removed by the Company shall be the property of the Company and any payment by customer shall not entitle customer to any ownership interest or right therein. The undersigned hereby requests and authorizes the NORTHERN STATES COMPANY to do the work described described above, and in consideration thereof, agrees to pay ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($ 100,900.00 ), in accordance with the following terms: *" Credit Approval Receipt of the above amount hereby acknowledged on behalf of NSP by NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Customer CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By By * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NSP Representative S. E. FRASER Division EDINA NSP Proj. No. STLGEDPFAJ/763858 Const. $ Rem. $ Maint. $ Oper. $ Transf. $ Total $ ORIGINAL-DIVISION ACCOUNTING COPY-CUSTOMER COPY-DIVISION DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: IV. G, SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 97-5447 Engineering Division Approve Construction and Operation Agreement with Hennepin County for Rodney W. Rue Temporary Traffic Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road Recommended Action: Approve resolution approving Construction and Operation Agreement for Temporary Traffic Control Signal system at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road. Overview: The City is proposing to install a temporary traffic signal system at the intersection of CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road. Hennepin County will own the system and MnDOT will operate the signal system and interconnect it with their proposed signals at the I-494 and CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) ramp intersections. Primary Issues: This agreement defines the construction, operation and maintenance responsibilities between Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie for this temporary signal system. Two other agreements are also necessary, one between MnDOT and the City of Eden Prairie and the other between MnDOT and Hennepin County. (Both agreements involving the City of Eden Prairie are on this agenda.) Ymancial Issues: The City of Eden Prairie is responsible for 100% of the construction and engineering costs associated with this temporary signal installation. Based on Hennepin County's signal priority/rating system, we will receive a credit for 75% of the construction cost of this system, as well as all the salvaged equipment once a permanent signal system is installed. This agreement contains no direct payment to Hennepin County. We hereby recommend approval of the resolution approving the Construction and Operation Agreement for Temporary Traffic Signal system at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road (Hennepin County Agreement No. PW12-49-98). The agreement is available in the Engineering Division. I CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVAL OF A CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AGREEMENT FOR A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM AT CSAH 39 (VALLEY VIEW ROAD) AND PLAZA DRIVE/TOPVIEW ROAD I.C. 97-5447 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared construction plans for the construction of a temporary traffic signal at the CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road intersection within the corporate boundaries of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS, a Construction and Operation Agreement has been prepared by Hennepin County which identifies the construction, operation and maintenance obligations for the construction of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that said Construction and Operation Agreement No. PW12-49-98 for County Project No. 9810 (City Project No. 97-5447) is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Donald R. Uram, City Clerk DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: s 1.1 SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 97-5447 Engineering Division Approve Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MnDOT for Temporary Rodney W. Rue Traffic Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road Recommended Action: Approve resolution approving Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 77494 with MnDOT for Temporary Traffic Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road Overview: The City is proposing to install a temporary traffic signal system at the intersection of CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road. Hennepin County will own the system and MnDOT will operate the signal system and interconnect it with their proposed signals at the I-494 and CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) ramp intersections. Primary Issues: This agreement defines the maintenance and financial responsibilities between MnDOT and the City of Eden Prairie based on MnDOT operating the signal. It also identifies the MnDOT- supplied materials (new cabinet and controller and some salvaged signal equipment from the Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive temporary signal system). Two other agreements are also necessary, one between Hennepin County and the City of Eden Prairie and the other between MnDOT and Hennepin County. (Both agreements involving the City of Eden Prairie are on this agenda.) Financial Issues: The City of Eden Prairie is responsible for 100% of the construction and engineering costs associated with this temporary signal installation. The City will also be responsible for purchasing a new signal cabinet and controller from MnDOT as defined in this agreement at an estimated cost of$15,000. MnDOT will be providing some salvaged signal equipment from the TH 212 Stage I project that will be used on this project with no direct payment required. We hereby recommend approval of the resolution approving the Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MnDOT for Temporary Traffic Signals at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road. The agreement is available in the Engineering Division. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. APPROVAL OF A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT FOR A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM AT CSAH 39 (VALLEY VIEW ROAD) AND PLAZA DRIVE/TOPVIEW ROAD I.C. 97-5447 WHEREAS, the City of Eden Prairie has prepared construction plans for the construction of a temporary traffic signal at the CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road intersection within the corporate boundaries of the City of Eden Prairie; WHEREAS, a Traffic Control Signal Agreement has been prepared by MnDOT which identifies the construction, operation and maintenance obligations for the construction of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie that said Traffic control Signal Agreement No. 77494 for County Project No. 9810 (City Project No. 97-5447) is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Donald R. Uram, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss HENNEPIN COUNTY ) This agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998, by Jean L. Harris and Donald R. Uram, the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Eden Prairie. Notary Public My commission expires Z DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: 11 J SECTION: Director of Public Works Y DEPARTMENT: TTEM DESCRIPTION: I.C. 97-5447 Public Works Award Contract for Temporary Traffic Signal System at CSAH 39 (Valley Eugene A. Dietz View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road Requested Action: Approve resolution awarding contract for temporary signal system at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. Overview: Hennepin County recently performed a signal analysis at this intersection. The results of that analysis indicated that this intersection met four signal warrants and had a County priority factor of 55 (County policy requires a priority factor of 30 or more before they allow a signal to be installed). Primary Issues: This signal is very important in providing access to the businesses along Plaza Drive. It will become even more important after TH 5 traffic gets relocated onto Plaza Drive and this intersection (Valley View Road and Plaza Drive) becomes the only access for Plaza Drive businesses. The schedule for that major TH 5 traffic switch onto Plaza Drive is near the end of June. Financial Issues: The bids are summarized on the attached letter from Westwood Professional Services, Inc. The low bid was received from Ridgedale Electric, Inc. in the amount of $76,000, which is approximately 9% above the engineer's estimate of $70,000. The project is proposed to be financed by the TIF fund and we will receive a 75% credit from Hennepin County once a permanent system is installed. The total project cost (including engineering and MnDOT supplied equipment) is approximately $108,000. With a bid higher than estimated, re-bidding the project would normally be an option. However, in order to remain on schedule and have this signal operational by the end of June, we would recommend awarding the contract to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. in the amount of$76,000. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improvement: LC. 97-5447 - Temporary Traffic Signal System at CSAH 39 (Valley View Road) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law. Those bids received are shown on the attached Summary of Bids; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer recommends award of Contract to RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC, INC. as the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter in a Contract with Ridgedale Electric, Inc. in the name of the City of Eden Prairie in the amount of $76,000.00 in accordance with the plans and specifications thereof approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Engineer. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Z Westwood Professional Services,Inc. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 April 30, 1998 Phone:612-937-5150 Fax:612-937-5822 Toll Free:1-888-937-5150 Email:wps©westwoodps.com Mr. Rodney W. Rue, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • RE: Award of Contract Temporary Traffic Control Signal System Valley View Road (C.S.A.H. 39) and Plaza Drive/Topview Road City Project No. I. C. 97-5447 Dear Mr. Rue: On April 30, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., four bids were received and opened for the above referenced project. We have reviewed the bids submitted to the City of Eden Prairie and determined that Ridgedale Electric, Inc. has submitted the lowest responsible bid. The following summary is provided: Engineer's Estimate $70,000.00 Ridgedale Electric, Inc $76,000.00 Egan McKay, Inc. $76,382.00 Killmer Electric Co., Inc. $76,550.00 Electrical Installation & Maintenance Co. $84,771.00 The Ridgedale Electric, Inc. bid is approximately 8.6% above the Engineer's Estimate for the project. • • We recommend that the City award the project to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. in accordance with their proposal form. Respectfully submitted, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC. I. v, 5„ NActc,„0„1&t41 Allan S. Klugman, P. E. • Principal Transportation Engineer Designing the Future Today...since 1972 3 DATE: 05/19/98 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: sv SECTION: Consent Calendar DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Division Settler's Ridge Early Grading Permit Alan Gray Recommended Action: Authorize staff to issue an early grading permit for the Settler's Ridge residential subdivision located westerly of Riley Creek and southerly of Pioneer Trail (CSAH 1). Since the project does not have Second Reading, the early grading permit is issued at "the Developer's risk". Overview: Council reviewed the Settler's Ridge subdivision at the council meeting held May 5, 1998. Pemtom Development Company had intended to request Council authorize early grading permit at that meeting. During the lengthy discussion over certain issues such as connecting a proposed cul-de-sac, the request for the early grading permit was overlooked. Currently there are several areas of active erosion in the River Bluff and Creek Bluff areas of this proposed project. These active erosion areas will be repaired as part of the overall grading project and the design of the grading and storm drainage system will prevent future erosion. Staff believes there is benefit to begin grading at an earlier date to secure these active erosion areas from further problems during summer rainfall events. An early start on grading may also increase the success of site restoration this fall by allowing for an earlier installation of top soil and seed mixtures. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR �j �( ITEM NO. J-�l• K. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 2.76 acres and Zoning District Amendment within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres; • Adopt the Resolution approving Site Plan Review on 2.76 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Zoning District Amendment 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 11-98-PUD-8-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH,AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be amended within the Office Zoning District 11-98-PUD-8-98 (hereinafter "PUD-8-98-Office") to the overall Bryant Lake Center Planned Unit Development. Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of May 19, 1998,entered into between Oppidan Inc.and the City of Eden Prairie, (hereinafter"Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-8-98-Office, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-8-98-Office is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-8-98-Office is designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-8-98-Office are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-8-98-Office is of sufficient size,composition,and arrangement that its construction,marketing, and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be,and hereby is amended within the Office District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development 8-98-Office, and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B,shall be and are amended accordingly. 2- Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled"General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled"Violation a Misdemeanor"are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1998, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of May, 1998. ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 11-98-PUD-8-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CERTAIN LAND WITHIN A ZONING DISTRICT, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows the amending of land located at Valley View and Office Ridge Circle, within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres; subject to the terms and conditions of a Developer's Agreement. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/Donald R. Uram /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) "1 EXHIBIT A Office Ridge Circle Building Legal Description: Outlot A, Extended Stay America OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT BY OPPIDAN INC. WHEREAS, Oppidan Inc. has applied for Site Plan approval of Office Ridge Circle Development on 2.76 acres for construction of a 38,600 square foot three-story office building located at Valley View and Office Ridge Circle, within the Office Zoning District on 2.76 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on April 7, 1998; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its March 9, 1998, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1998, meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Oppidan Inc. for the construction of a 38,600 square foot building,based on plans dated March 25, 1998,between Oppidan Inc., and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris,Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk • l0 • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE BUILDING THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of May 19, 1998, by Oppidan Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer," and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Developer has applied to City for Planned Unit Development District Review on 2.76 acres,Zoning District Amendment within the Office zoning district on 2.76 acres, Site Plan Review on 2.76 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 2.76 acres into one lot for construction of a 38,586 square foot office building, legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. //-re' for Planned Unit Development District Review and Zoning District Amendment within the Office zoning district,Resolution No. for Site Plan Review, and Resolution No. 98-65 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated March 25, 1998, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 7, 1998, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for streets, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved street and utility plans concurrent with building construction and prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for the property. Prior to release of the building permit,the Developer shall provide the City Engineer with a televised inspection tape and report of the sanitary sewer line adjacent to the building foundation. One year after building occupancy,the Developer shall again provide the City Engineer with a new televised tape and inspection report demonstrating the structural integrity of the same sanitary sewer line. If deformation of the sanitary sewer is observed, Developer shall repair the affected pipe areas by methods approved by the City Engineer. 4. GRADING, DRAINAGE,AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan shall include all water quality ponds, storm water detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit.All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map shall be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. The Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan prior to release of the grading bond. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features,temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to release of the grading bond. Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the existing and or proposed sedimentation pond during construction. Developer shall provide preconstruction and post construction surveys for evaluation by City. 5. CROSS ACCESS,MAINTENANCE AND USE AGREEMENT:Prior to issuance of the building permit for the Property, the Developer shall enter into a cross access and maintenance agreement with Extended Stay America, the form of which must be reviewed by the City Engineer. This Agreement shall address use and maintenance of the storm sewers and ponding areas. All of these facilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Developer or Owner. Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Property,Developer shall submit to the City Engineer proof that the cross access and maintenance agreement has been recorded in the Hennepin County Recorder's Office/Registrar of Titles' Office. 6. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property,Developer shall submit to the Chief Building Official,and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. • These plans shall include details with respect to the height,type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls, including the use of modular masonry materials. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto, prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 7. TRAIL EASEMENT: Prior to release of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall submit a trail easement for review and written approval by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources, along the north property line as depicted on Exhibit B. Prior to the release of the building permit for the Property, Developer shall submit evidence to the Director of Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources,that the approved trail easement has been filed in the Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrar of Titles' Office. 8. IRRIGATION PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance,Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 9. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance,the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity,type, and size • of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150%of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 10. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air- conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with 9 that provided for landscaping on the Property, in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner,in his or her sole discretion,that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses, then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures. 11. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 12. PROOF OF PARKING SPACES: Developer and City acknowledge that the 31 proof of parking spaces proposed for the Property, depicted in Exhibit B, are not required to be constructed at this time. At such time as the City Manager,in his or her sole discretion,determines that it is necessary for all or a portion of the proof of parking spaces to be constructed in order to accommodate the building use, the City Manager shall notify the Developer in writing of the need to construct additional proof of parking spaces. This notification shall include the number, location and timetable for construction of the additional proof-of-parking spaces. Developer shall comply with all requirements contained in the City Manager's notification. 13. SITE LIGHTING: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for site lighting on the Property. All pole lighting shall consist of downcast shoebox fixtures not to exceed 30 feet in height. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved lighting plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 14. TRASH ENCLOSURE: Developer has submitted to the City Planner,and obtained the City Planner's written approval of a plan for the design and construction of the outside trash enclosure for the Property. This trash enclosure shall be constructed with face brick to match the building, and heavy duty steel gates that completely screen the interior of the enclosure. Developer shall complete implementation of the trash enclosure plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 10 15. SIGNS: Developer agrees that for each sign which requires a permit by Eden Prairie City Code,Section 11.70,Developer shall file with the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of an application for a sign permit. The application shall include a complete description of the sign and a sketch showing the size, location,the manner of construction, and other such information as necessary to inform the City of the kind, size, material construction, and location of any such sign, consistent with the sign plan shown on Exhibit B and in accordance with the requirements of City Code, Section 11.70, Subdivision 5a. 16. PUD WAIVERS GRANTED: The city hereby grants the following waivers to City Code requirements within the Office Zoning District through the Planned Unit Development District Review for the Property and incorporates said waivers as part of PUD -$'-95' . A. Building height of 42 feet. City Code permits a maximum building height of 30 feet. 17. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (includingattorneys'fees),damages and injunctions relating to any acts,failures to act,errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants,contractors,subcontractors,suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. II • OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN OPPIDAN INC. AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into as of May 19, 1998,by and between , and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ("City"): Eden Prairie Land Company II, a Minnesota general partnership, ("Owner") For, and in consideration of,and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No. // :-9j,approving the PUD District Review and amending the zoning within the Office district for the Property owned by Owner, and Resolution No. 98-65 for Preliminary Plat as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of May 5, 1998, by and between Oppidan Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and City("Developer's Agreement"), Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Oppidan Inc.,fails to complete construction and development in accordance with the Developer's Agreement and fails to obtain an occupancy permit for all of the improvements referred to in the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date of this Owners' Supplement, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the PUD District Review, Zoning District Amendment, Site Plan Review, and Preliminary Plat identified above, thus restoring the status of the Property before the Developer's Agreement and all approvals listed above were approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers this Property,Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to all of the terms, conditions and obligations of "Developer" in the Developer's Agreement. 12, EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR L. ITEM NO. TV- DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger '97 BFI REZONING- SPRINT TOWER Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 9.5 acres; • Adopt the Resolution approving Site Plan Review on 9.5 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for Zoning District Change 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement `97 BFI REZONING- SPRINT TOWER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 12-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the I-2 District. SECTION 3. That the proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the I-2 District, and the legal descriptions of land in each District referred to in City Code Section 11.03, Subdivision 1, Subparagraph B, shall be, and are amended accordingly. SECTION 4. City Code Chapter 1,entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation"and Section 11.99,"Violation a Misdemeanor"are hereby adopted in their entirety,by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. SECTION 5. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of May 19, 1998, entered into between BFI/Sprint and the City of Eden Prairie, and which Agreement are hereby made a part hereof. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 4th day of November, 1997, finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of May, 1998. ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 2 `97 BFI REZONING-SPRINT TOWER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 12-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Summazy: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at 9813 Flying Cloud Drive from Rural to I-2 on 9.5 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/Donald R. Uram /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) Exhibit A 3 BFI REZONING - Sprint Tower Exhibit A - Legal Description PROPOSE:0 RAZONING „OA:S'CRIPTlON.- Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast One Quarter of the Southwest One Quarter, Section 27, Township 116, Range 22, Hennepin County, Minnesota, thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 57 seconds East assumed bearing along the east line of said Northeast One Quarter of the Southwest One Quarter a distance of 353.09 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 48 degrees 39 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 345.15 feet; thence South 41 degrees 20 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 640.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 39 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 655.06 feet to the Southeasterly right of way line of U.S. Trunk Highway 169-212; thence North 41 degrees 20 minutes 23 seconds East along said right of way line a distance of 640.00 feet; thence South 48 degrees 39 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 309.91 feet to the point of beginning, over the following described property: All that part of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies Southerly of the Southerly right of way line of U.S. Trunk Highway No. 169-212. All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies southeasterly of the southeasterly right of way line of U.S. Trunk Highway No. 169-212. The Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section .27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. That part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian which lies Southeasterly of the center line of U.S. Truck Highway No. 169-212 and which lies west of a line described as follows: - Commencing at a point on the South line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, 41 rods East of the Southwest corner thereof and extending North to its intersection with the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 27 of a point 17 rods East of the Northwest corner thereof. That part of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at a point In the East line of the West 5/8 of the North ? of the Southeast 1/4 distant 495 feet South from the Northeast corner thereof; thence South to the Southeast corner thereof; thence West to a point on the South ►ine thereof 41 rods East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly to an intersection with a line parallel with and 495 feet South from the North line of the Southeast 1/4 along a line which if extended would intersect the North line of the Northeast 1/4 distant 17 rods East form the Northwest corner thereof; thence East to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING from said Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian the following described tracts: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 114 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; thence North along the West line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 to its intersection with the following described line: - 4 • Commencing at a point on the West line of said Section, distant 471.1 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; running thence in a Northeasterty direction at an ongio 87 degrees 06 minutes with the said West section line for a distance of 508.2 feet; thence deflecting to the left on a 04 degree 00 minutes curve with a radius of 1432.7 feet for a distance of 561.8 feet; thence deflecting to the right along the radius of said curve produced Southeasterly for a distance of 60 feet; thence running in a Northeasterly direction along a line parallel with and distant 60 feet Southeasterly from the above mentioned 04 degrees 00 minutes curie for a distance of 210 feet; thence deflecting to the right in a Southeasterly direction along the radius of the above mentioned 04 digress 00 minutes curve for a distance of 172 feet; thence deflecting to the left at an angle of 52 degrees 10 minutes for a distance of 347 feet; thence deflecting to the right at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes for a distance of 240 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting to the right at an angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes and extending to its intersection with the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 which is the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence returning along said line to the point of its beginning; thence deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes a distance of 240 feet; thence deflecting to the left at an angle of 21 degrees 16 minutes a distance of 442.5 feet more or less, to the Southeasterly right of way Tins of U.S. Trunk Highway No. 169-212; thence Southwesterly along the right of way tine of said highway to its intersection with the West line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South along said West line to the point of actual beginning. Beginning at a point on the South lino of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22, West of the 5th Principal Floridian distant 41 rods East of the Southwest corner thereof; ;hence North 5 duress 20 minutes West a distance of 1543.56 feet to the center lire of U.S. Trunr Highway No. 169-212; thanes Scuth 41 degree: 1u feet West along the centerline of scid Highway 1568.2 f:Jet; thence South 55 ds;retie 11 minutes Eo_t 457.41 feet; thence South 64 degrees 25 minutes Ea_t 156.37 feet; thence South 61 dogrtee 54 minutes Ecut S82 feeh thence North 26 degrees 39 minutes Eaa 3495.0b feet; thence South 83 don_reee 35 minute: East 42.75 feet more or less to the point of beginning,. All that part of the South 1/2 or the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 22 described as follows: From a point on the West line of said Section 27, distant 471.1 feet North of the Southwest corner of sold South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; thence running In a Northeasterly direction al an angle of 87 degrees 06 minute with said West section line for a distance of 561.3; thence deflecting to the left on a 04 degree 00 minuutes curia with a radius of 1432.7 feat for a distance of 651.8 feet; thence deflecting to the right along the radius of said curve produced Southsa•rteriy for a distance of 60 feet; thence running In a Northeasterly direction along a line parail..l with and distant 60 feet southeasterly from the above described 0.4 degree 00 minutes curve for o distance of 210 feat; thence deflecting to the right in a Soutneazt_riy direction along the radius of the above mentioned 04 de irete CO minutes curve for 172.0 feet; thence detle Ling to the left, deflection angle of 52 degrees )0 minutes for a dieto.'1cs of 347.0 feet; thence to the right deflection angle 90 aegrees a distance of 1C4 feet to the actual pc!rt of beginning of the tract of land herby to be described; thence back along the last ds:cribsd course a aistonce of 100 feet; thcncs to the Lit deflection angle 21 degrees 1 d minutes a distance of 4-e2.5 feet, more or hits, to the Southeasterly line of the ri•;hf of way of U.S. Trunk Highway No. 169 and 212, for called as the same ors now laid out and constructed: thence North-easterly along the Southeoeterfy line of sold Trunk Highways No. 169 and 212, a distance of 176.55 feet; thence Southeasterly along a line parallel with and distant 150 feet Northeasterly from the next to the last dascrtiaed course a distance of 687.35 feet; thence Wecterty to the point of - bertinning a distance of 195.1 feat, more cr Ic;s. 6 `97 BFI REZONING- SPRINT TOWER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR`97 BFI REZONING- SPRINT TOWER BY BFI/SPRINT WHEREAS,BFI/Sprint has applied for Site Plan approval of`97 BFI Rezoning-Sprint Tower on 9.5 acres for construction of a single 80-foot-high monopole located at 9813 Flying Cloud Drive,to be zoned from Rural to I-2 on 9.5 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on November 4, 1997; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its October 27, 1997, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its November 4, 1997, meeting; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to BFI/Sprint for the construction of a monopole, based on plans dated October 24, 1997,between BFI/Sprint, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk t0 • DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT SPRINT CELLULAR TOWER THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of May 19, 1998, by Sprint PCS, a Minnesota corporation,hereinafter referred to as"Developer,"and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City:" WITNESSETH: • WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Zoning District Change from Rural to I-2 on 9.5 acres,and Site Plan Review on 9.5 acres for construction of a 80-foot high cellular tower,legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No./2-9$"for Zoning District Change, and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review. Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated October 24, 1997, reviewed and approved by the City Council on November 4, 1997, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. PRIVATE DRIVEWAY: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit proof to the City Planner that a reciprocal,joint access and maintenance agreement for a shared driveway providing access to the Property has been filed against the Property, and the property which the driveway is situated, with the Hennepin County Recorder's/Registrar of Titles' Office in a form approved in writing by the City Planner. 4. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: Developer acknowledges that the City has approved plans and rezoning of the Property only for the proposed 80-foot high cellular tower, as depicted in Exhibit B. Prior to any development or construction beyond this approval on the Property, Developer shall be required to submit detailed development plans, and all other submittals required by the Eden Prairie City Code, and obtain approval of those plans and submittals by the Planning Commission and City Council. 5. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs 7 (including attorney's fees),damages and injunctions relating to any acts, failures to act, errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection, review or approval by City. • • • OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPRINT PCS AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into as of May 19, 1998,by and between Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, ("Owner"), and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ("City"): - For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No.; -9/, changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the I-2 District,and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of May 19, 1998, by and between Sprint PCS, a Minnesota corporation, and City ("Developer's Agreement"), Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Sprint PCS,fails to complete construction and development in accordance with the Developer's Agreement and fails to obtain an occupancy permit for all of the improvements referred to in the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date of this Owners' Supplement, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Rezoning and Site Plan Review identified above, thus restoring the status of the Property before the Developer's Agreement and all approvals listed above were approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers this Property,Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to all of the terms, conditions and obligations of "Developer" in the.Developer's Agreement. 4. Owner acknowledges that the City has approved plans and rezoning of the Property only for the proposed 80-foot high cellular tower, as depicted in the Developer's Agreement. Prior to any development or construction beyond this approval on the Property, Owner shall be required to submit detailed development plans,and all other submittals required by the Eden Prairie City Code, and obtain approval of those plans and submittals by the Planning Commission and City Council. 9 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR mm ITEM NO. ° I DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger GERRING CAR WASH- REZONING Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Approve 2nd Reading of an Ordinance for PUD District Review on 3.76 acres and Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial on 2.5 acres; • Adopt the Resolution approving Site Plan Review on 3.76 acres; • Approval of a Developer's Agreement. Supporting Reports: 1. Ordinance for PUD District Review and Rezoning 2. Resolution for Site Plan Review 3. Developer's Agreement GERRING CAR WASH-REZONING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 12-98-PUD-9-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. That the land which is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter,the"land")is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2. That action was duly initiated proposing that the land be removed from the Rural District and be placed in the Community Commercial Zoning Districts 12-98-PUD-9-98 (hereinafter "PUD-9-98-C-Comrn"). Section 3. The land shall be subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Developer's Agreement dated as of May 19, 1998, entered into between Gerring Properties, and the City of Eden Prairie (hereinafter "Developer's Agreement"). The Developer's Agreement contains the terms and conditions of PUD-9-98-C-Comm, and are hereby made a part hereof. Section 4. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. PUD-9-98-C-Comm is not in conflict with the goals of the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. B. PUD-9-98-C-Comm designed in such a manner to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. C. The exceptions to the standard requirements of Chapters 11 and 12 of the City Code that are contained in PUD-9-98-C-Comm are justified by the design of the development described therein. D. PUD-9-98-C-Comm is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing,and operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any subsequent unit. Section 5. The proposal is hereby adopted and the land shall be, and hereby is removed from the Rural District and shall be included hereafter in the Planned Unit Development PUD-9-98-C-Comm and the legal descriptions of land in each district referred to in City Code Section 11.03, subdivision 1, subparagraph B, shall be and are amended accordingly. 2. Section 6. City Code Chapter 1 entitled"General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 11.99 entitled"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie on the 7th day of April, 1998, and finally read and adopted and ordered published in summary form as attached hereto at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on the 19th day of May, 1998. ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk Jean L. Harris, Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on 3 GERRING CAR WASH-REZONING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 12-98-PUD-9-98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA, REMOVING CERTAIN LAND FROM ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND PLACING IT IN ANOTHER, AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LAND IN EACH DISTRICT, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA,ORDAINS: Summary: This ordinance allows rezoning of land located at Hwy 212 and Aztec Drive from Rural to C-Comm on 3.76 acres. Exhibit A, included with this Ordinance, gives the full legal description of this property. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect upon publication. ATTEST: /s/Donald R. Uram /s/Jean L. Harris City Clerk Mayor PUBLISHED in the Eden Prairie News on the (A full copy of the text of this Ordinance is available from City Clerk.) Gerring Car Wash-Rezoning Exhibit A Legaal Descri�t, ion: • Lot 1,Block 1, Anderson Lakes Commercial Center 4th Addition GERRING CAR WASH-REZONING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR GERRING CAR WASH -REZONING BY GERRING PROPERTIES WHEREAS, Gerring Properties has applied for Site Plan approval of Gerring Car Wash-Rezoning Development on 3.76 acres for construction of a 18,225 square foot building located at Hwy 212 and Aztec Drive, to be zoned from Rural to Community Commercial Zoning District on 2.5 acres by an Ordinance adopted by the City Council on April 7, 1998; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission reviewed said application at a public hearing at its March 9, 1998, Planning Commission meeting and recommended approval of said site plans; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said application at a public hearing at its April 7, 1998, meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,that site plan approval be granted to Gerring Properties for the construction of a 18,225 square foot building,based on plans dated March 16, 1998, between Gerring Properties, and the City of Eden Prairie. ADOPTED by the City Council on May 19, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk (P DEVELOPER AGREEMENT GERRING CAR WASH THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of May 19, 1998, by Gerring Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation,hereinafter referred to as "Developer,"and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City": WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has applied to City for Rezoning from Rural to Community Commercial, Site Plan Review,PUD Concept Amendment and Preliminary Plat for construction of a 18,225 square foot building, all on 3.76 acres legally described on Exhibit A(the "Property"); NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the City adopting Ordinance No. 12-98-PUD-9- 98 for PUD District Review and Rezoning,Resolution No. 98-64 for PUD Concept Amendment, Resolution No. for Site Plan Review and Resolution No. 98-63 for Preliminary Plat, Developer agrees to construct, develop and maintain the Property as follows: 1. PLANS: Developer agrees to develop the Property in conformance with the materials revised and dated March 31, 1998, reviewed and approved by the City Council on April 7, 1998, and attached hereto as Exhibit B, subject to such changes and modifications as provided herein. 2. EXHIBIT C: Developer agrees to the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions set forth in Exhibit C. 3. STREET AND UTILITY PLANS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for the construction of streets and utilities for the Property, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer, and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of plans for streets,public sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved street and utility plans prior to building permit issuance. 4. GRADING,DRAINAGE,AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS: A. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN: Developer agrees that the grading and drainage plan contained in Exhibit B is conceptual. Prior to the release of a land alteration permit for the Property, Developer shall submit and obtain the City Engineer's written approval of a final grading and drainage plan for the Property. The final grading and drainage plan will include all water quality ponds, storm water 3 detention areas and other items required by the application for and release of a land alteration permit.All design calculations for storm water quality and quantity together with a drainage area map will be submitted with the final grading and drainage plan. Prior to release of the grading bond,Developer shall certify to the City that the water quality pond conforms to the final grading plan. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. Developer shall employ the design professional who prepared the final grading plan. The design professional shall monitor construction for conformance to the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. The design professional shall provide a final report to the City certifying completion of the grading in conformance the approved final grading plan and City erosion control policy. B. EROSION CONTROL PLAN: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall submit to the City Engineer and obtain City Engineer's written approval of an erosion control plan for the Property. The erosion control plan shall include all boundary erosion control features,temporary stockpile locations and turf restoration procedures: All site grading operations shall conform to the City's Erosion Control Policy labeled Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Prior to release of the grading bond, Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan Developer shall remove any sediment that accumulates in the proposed sedimentation pond during construction. • 5. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: Prior to building permit issuance, Developer shall submit to the City Planner, and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan depicting exterior materials and colors to be used on the buildings on the Property. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property,Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved exterior materials and colors plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto. 6. IRRIGATION PLAN: Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a plan for irrigation of the landscaped areas on the Property. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved irrigation plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Prior to building permit issuance,the Developer shall submit to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's written approval of a final landscape plan for the Property. The approved landscape plan shall be consistent with the quantity,type, and size of plant materials shown on the landscape plan on Exhibit B. Developer shall furnish to the City Planner and receive the City Planner's approval of a landscape bond equal to 150%of the cost of said improvements as required by City Code. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property, Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved landscape plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C. 8. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING: Developer shall submit to City Planner, and receive City Planner's written approval of a plan for screening of mechanical equipment on the Property. For purposes of this paragraph, "mechanical equipment" includes gas meters, electrical conduit, water meters, and standard heating, ventilating, and air- conditioning units. Security to guarantee construction of said screening shall be included with that provided for landscaping on the Property,in accordance with City Code requirements. Developer shall complete implementation of the approved plan prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. If, after completion of construction of the mechanical equipment screening, it is determined by the City Planner,in his or her sole discretion,that the constructed screening does not meet the Code requirements to screen mechanical equipment from public streets and differing, adjacent land uses,then the City Planner shall notify Developer and Developer shall take corrective action to reconstruct the mechanical equipment screening in order to cure the deficiencies identified by the City Planner. Developer agrees that City will not release the security provided until Developer completes all such corrective measures. 9. RETAINING WALLS: Prior to issuance by the City of any permit for grading or construction on the Property,Developer shall submit to the ChiefBuilding Official,and obtain the Chief Building Official's written approval of detailed plans for the retaining walls identified on the grading plan in Exhibit B. These plans shall include details with respect to the height,type of materials, and method of construction to be used for the retaining walls. Developer agrees to complete implementation of the approved retaining wall plan in accordance'with the terms and conditions of Exhibit C, attached hereto,prior to issuance of any occupancy permit for the Property. 10. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTRACTORS: Developer agrees to release, defend and indemnify City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, complaints, loss, costs (including attorneys'fees),damages and injunctions relating to any acts,failures to act,errors, omissions of Developer or Developer's.consultants,contractors,subcontractors,suppliers and agents. Developer shall not be released from its responsibilities to release, defend and indemnify because of any inspection,review or approval by City. OWNERS' SUPPLEMENT TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BETWEEN GERRING CAR WASH AND THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of May 19, 1998, by and between 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, ("Owner"), and the CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE ("City"): For, and in consideration of, and to induce City to adopt Ordinance No.12-98-PUD-9-98, changing the zoning of the Property owned by Owner from the Rural District to the Community Commercial District,and Resolution No. for Site Plan Review as more fully described in that certain Developer's Agreement entered into as of May 19, 1998, by and between 169 Anderson Lakes Corporation,a Minnesota Corporation,and City("Developer's Agreement"),Owner agrees with City as follows: 1. If Gerring Car Wash, fails to complete construction and development in accordance fails to obtain an occ upancy an c permit for all of the Agreement and p Y p with the Developer'sgr improvements referred to in the Developer's Agreement within 24 months of the date of this Owners' Supplement, Owner shall not oppose the City's reconsideration and rescission of the Rezoning, and Site Plan Review, thus restoring the status of the Property before the Developer's Agreement and all approvals listed above were approved. 2. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against Owner,its successors, and assigns of the Property. 3. If Owner transfers this Property,Owner shall obtain an agreement from the transferee requiring that such transferee agree to all of the terms, conditions and obligations of "Developer" in the Developer's Agreement. /0 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-15-98 SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. I V(I DEPARTMENT: Finance ITEM DESCRIPTION: Initial resolution relating to a Don Uram health care facilities revenue refunding bond. Financing for Castle Ridge Care Center,Inc. Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: • Adopt the initial resolution relating to a health care facilities revenue refunding bond. Background: The City previously issued$3,875,000 First Mortgage Health Care Refunding Revenue Bonds(Castle Ridge Care Center Inc. Project) Series 1989. Castle Ridge has requested to refinance these original bonds. The City has generally been accommodating to these requests. A public hearing will be held Tuesday June 16, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. to provide an opportunity for interested individuals to express their views. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution FROM GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT (#1) (THU) 5. 14' 98 1 3:50/ST. 1 3:48/NO. 4261011197 P 2 Council Member offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. INITIAL RESOLUTION RELATING TO A HEALTH CARE FACILITIES REVENUE REFUNDING BOND FINANCING FOR CASTLE RIDGE CARE CENTER, INC., CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA(the"City") WHEREAS, the City has previously issued its $3,875,000 First Mortgage Health Care Refunding Revenue Bonds (Castle Ridge Care Center, Inc. Project) Series 1989 (the "Prior Bonds"); and WHEREAS, Castle Ridge Care Center, Inc., a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation"), intends to refinance (through the refunding of the Prior Bonds) and improve its existing nursing home and assisted living facilities located at 625 Prairie Center Drive in the City (the"Project"); and WHEREAS, the Corporation represents that the economic stability of the Project will be greatly enhanced through the issuance of revenue refunding bonds by the City and therefore requests the City to declare its present intent to issue its revenue refunding bonds to provide funds to refinance and improve the Project; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to issue its revenue bonds for such purposes by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended(the"Act"); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, a,s follows: Section 1. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, to issue revenue refunding bonds of the City in an aggregate principal amount expected to not exceed $4,000,000 for the purpose of refinancing and improving the Project,subject to a public hearing to be held as described in Section 3 hereof. Section 2. The officers and employees of the City are hereby authorized to take such further action as is necessary to carry out the intent and purposes of this resolution. All details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to final approval of this Council. The revenue bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, and the bonds, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues received from a revenue agreement with the Corporation and shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City. 2 FRCM GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY 84 BENNETT (#1) (TAU) 5. 14' 98 3 3:h1/ST. 1 3:48/NO. 4261011197 P 3 Section 3. The City Council shall hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m. central time on Tuesday, June 16, 1998 at the Council Chambers in City Hall, 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, to provide an opportunity for interested individuals to express their views on the proposed issue of the bonds and the nature of the Project. The City Clerk shall cause a notice of public hearing in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A to be published in the official newspaper of the City no fewer than fourteen(14)days before the hearing. Section 4. The Corporation has agreed to pay directly or through the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development; whether or not the Project is carried to completion; and whether or not the Bonds or operative instruments are executed. Section 5. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guarantee or a firm commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Corporation. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount referred to in Section 1 hereof, should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds in an amount less than referred to in Section 1 hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreements as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. Section 6. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that the City and the Corporation shall have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, the Bonds, and of the other instruments and proceedings relating to the Bonds and that the closing of the issuance and sale of the Bonds shall have occurred by no later than December 31, 1999. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the time set forth above,or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time, this resolution shall expire and be of no further effect. Adopted: May 19, 1998. Approved: Mayor Attest: City Clerk FROM GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT (#1) (THU) 5. 14' 98 13:52/ST. 1.3:48/NO. 4261011197 P 4 The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: and the following were absent or abstained: whereupon, the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was approved and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. GP:483712 vl FROM GRAY PLANT MOOT'TMOOTY & SENNETT C#1) CTHU) 5. f4 98 f3:52/ST. 13:48/NO. 4261 01 1 1 97 P 5 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE,MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota (the "City"), will meet at 7:30 p.m. central time on Tuesday, June 16, 1998, at the Council Chambers in the City Hall at 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue its Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (hereinafter the `Bonds") under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165,as amended,in order to refinance and finance, in whole or in part, the costs of a project. The proposed financing will consist of the refunding of certain revenue bonds previously issued by the City with respect to a 60-bed long-term care facility and attached 21-unit assisted living facility located at 625 Prairie Center Drive in the City (the "Project"), and owned by Castle Ridge Care Center, Inc., a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation"), together with the financing of certain miscellaneous improvements to the Project. The estimated aggregate principal amount of the proposed issue of Bonds is $4,000,000, with $3,250,000 allocable to refunding purposes and the remainder allocable to the improvements to the Project. The Bonds shall be limited obligations of the City, and the Bonds and the interest thereon shall be payable solely from the Corporation's revenues pledged to the payment thereof. No holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City, nor shall the same constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitations. A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development for approval of the Project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection following publication of this notice at the office of the City Clerk in City Hall, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, except legal holidays. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above or may file written comments with the City Clerk which shall be considered at the public hearing. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL • City Clerk GP:483712 vl EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.A. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger CHARLSON PROPERTY Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential and Office on 440 acres; 3. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations(and Council conditions). Background: This project is a change in land use to provide compatible land uses next to existing single family homes west of Eden Prairie Road and adjacent to the airport. The land use plan shows church and low density residential adjacent to Eden Prairie Road. Office is proposed adjacent to the airport. The March 1998 traffic study by Benshoof and Associates indicates that a total of 10,946 daily trips can be allocated to the Charlson, Standal and Brown properties without requiring road improvements outside of the properties. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses,the type and intensity of development related to traffic should be based on daily trips per acre. After subtracting out the church(450 daily trips),the airport,and open space,the net 276.8 acres can share 10,496 trips or 37.91 trips per acre. The 241 acres of the Charlson property would be allocated 9,138.5 daily trips. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the April 27, 1998 meeting. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Parks and Recreation Commission Resemmendati4a4 voted 6-0 to approve the project at the May 5, 1998 meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change 2. Staff Report dated 4-24-98 and 12-5-97 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 4-27-98 and 12-8-97 4. Correspondence CHARLSON PROPERTY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan("Plan"); and, WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Charlson Property by Lynn Charlson for future residential and office uses requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: 440 acres from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Office located South of Pioneer Trail. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk 2 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: April 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Charlson Property Guide Plan Change APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Lynn Charlson LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential,Office,and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain on 440 acres. 1 3 MIIIM. ;.:1 111:if:;5 L.. :,L, . -it r---,...i-'L-d'' • .. -ic• , • ,/•---, :,, 1 r• '• 'T 4 -..- . ' . / 2.-. .... -'1'' i,,•,,, _..--•,.. i—L- --I IA I I „,• . ! I I I A VALI AD I I 12 :•I, .f.I. / ig • I : 1 `,.. ,f.ir.• ik-e_RX -: -7 -.F ...•,•,- . ' , .. r/ .6 .____.--. IS r A • 4. i.-----) , ,,,, c f) 1 . • I ., . . • .7 f: ••" ---- liz•-...----------_ • • •t• i. qg Ig 6% g •----: I ii i l• .....'''''''''::j---. ..s.. • ... '..'ll :' P Naar° r I F CLOUD • i ,C, • • V -'--'-'- pL 1 Ps, .... • °C•1110c1hOR i 0 PICO CI7 I i • L __ —'---.. • • • ... 4644 FLY1N _ CLOO A .. II. }e 0 0 - 0 , . -----•_____0 •I • I ' I 1.4 1 I 7 . 0 i I 0' 0 •I te . •• i • 1 —r_______ _ ,lr• si, \ I • • ! • • •TRACT • F 41144 At TRACT C I ------------------- 4 / tr -.....swan . .. .....mailli . _ WIC AMR "F. cc. ------------ -----------------:L'-------------------- RIVE i • . . II -----......_......................, 'NI .. -...R.-.'::•.:1.:•Y:: ••••:. . . •. . . • g t •• •... ..•.• :.'• :.:2.•::.::.'ll•...:.:. 1 11, I • • .A I -.... .. . •. \ . ".:••':.:.:::',..t.::.'1,14.f.. . N .. „...•.. ,.. . ..•.: .. . ... . . .• . •• • • • • . ... . .. . . .. CRASS . .. . . . .. .-..,••.- ••..... ..„..., . -. .. i • .• ••,.. . • . . . ' . • . I ....::•''''..''..... .:. . . ' '''' '''''' . • . ...: . .. . \ . . . . . • • • ' 5 . • .. - ' • S I ' t••'' :-..'.....5. 11 i'. -. - • . i I • • • . . .. .. . . .. . . . . • A Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 BACKGROUND A public meeting was held last December to present the guide plan change request to the Planning Commission and the neighborhood. The Planning Commission directed that the plans eliminate industrial as a land use and do further traffic analyses to make sure that road and intersection capacity will not be exceeded. DEVELOPMENT REQUEST This 440 acre site is currently guided Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The owner is proposing a land use change to a mixture of Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential, Office, and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The office designation would be a minimum of 75% office. This would allow research and development, and office showroom buildings, and would preclude bulk industrial. PLANNING ISSUES • What are the significant natural resources on the site? How does the plan preserve them? Riley Creek, Minnesota River Bluff, and wooded areas are the significant natural resources. Theplan showsthe landalongRileyCreekandtheMinnesota River Bluff aspermanent open es p space. The City's shoreland ordinance requires a 100 foot structure setback and a 50 foot shore impact zone for single family and a 150 foot structure setback and 75 foot shore impact zone for multiple family. No grading or tree removal is allowed by City code in the shore impact zone. Low density is proposed along the edge of an oak savannah woods. Units would be clustered at the top of the slopes to protect vegetation on the east side facing Riley Creek. Multiple family and office uses with larger building and parking requirements are proposed in the areas without vegetation. • What are compatible land uses next to existing residential neighborhoods? Are the proposed land uses compatible? Low density residential, church and open space are compatible land uses. The proposed land use plan shows low density residential next to existing low density residential along Eden Prairie Road south of Riley Creek. Between Valley Road and Riley Creek the proposed land use is low density residential\public open space. If the airport purchases this area, the land will be open space. 2 Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 The Grace Church has purchased approximately 50 acres opposite homes on Valley and Hilltop Road. This land would be designated church. No plans have been submitted to the City for review. The site is large enough to construct a church campus similar to Wooddale or Pax Christi. The residential densities are similar and compatible with existing neighborhoods. The church can be compatible provided the plan has large setbacks,berming,landscaping with a relocated Eden Prairie Road and upgraded Pioneer Trail. • What are compatible land uses next to the airport? Does the proposed plan show compatible land uses? Office and open space are compatible uses. The plan shows office and open space adjacent to the airport. If the airport purchases the land it will be open space. • What are the housing goals for the City? How does the proposed plan help meet housing goals? General city housing goals are to provide a variety of housing and lifestyle choices. There is a need for senior one level walkout housing. The proposed plan for low density and multiple family residential will allow for a variety of housing types and styles to be built. Cluster, one level walkout housing is appropriate on wooded and sloped sites. Units can be clustered to maximize the amount of preserved open space. Affordable attached housing can be built in the proposed multiple family areas. • What is the capacity of roads in the area? Is the proposed plan consistent with road capacity? If not,what road improvements are required? The March 1998 traffic study by Benshoof and Associates indicates that a total of 10,946 daily trips can be allocated to the Charlson, Standl and Brown properties without requiring road improvements outside of the properties. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses, the type and intensity of development related to traffic should be based on daily trips per acre. After subtracting out the church (450 daily trips), airport, and open space, the net 276.8 acres can share 10,496 trips or 37.91 trips per acre. The 241 acres of the Charlson property would be allocated 9,138.5 daily trips. • Are proposed road alignments consistent with the City's transportation plan? The proposed road alignments are in some ways consistent with the City's a Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 transportation plan and in other ways not consistent. The Charlson plan shows the southerly end of Eden Prairie Road disconnected from TH 212 and connected to CSAH 4 north of TH212. While not shown on the transportation plan, there are some positive aspects to this change. The intersection would be eliminated along TH212 which should improve the safety of this corridor. The probability that Eden Prairie Road would be used as an alternative to CSAH 4 for trips between CSAH 1 and TH212 would be significantly reduced. This is an appropriate change considering the land use adjacent to Eden Prairie Road is residential. The plan proposes a realignment of CSAH 4 through the properties to intersect with TH212 near Flying Cloud Airport. This would result in the southerly segment of existing Spring Road becoming a city street. The proposed new road alignment through the Charlson property to serve its development is appropriate. Switching the designation of CSAH 4 from Spring Road to this new road alignment is probably not appropriate considering the functional classification for CSAH 4 and travel patterns between TH212 and CSAH 1. The realignment of the intersection of CSAH 4 with CSAH 1 from its current location and a common intersection with Mitchell Road westerly to a common intersection with the north leg of CSAH 4 is consistent with the City's transportation plan and a desirable change. This provides for better continuity along CSAH 4 which is classified as an arterial roadway. This will reduce the likelihood that arterial level traffic is transferred to Mitchell Road which is a local collector. • Will the sanitary sewer and water main facility plan for the Charlson property serve other properties? A system of liftstations and force main will be necessary to provide sewer service in this area. The main elements of both the sanitary sewer and water distribution systems will follow existing corridors like Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. Ultimately, existing neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road will receive service from the same system's that serve the Charlson property. Historically, the city has considered extending sewer and water service into neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road when there is a request for service from a significant number of existing property owners in the neighborhood. Current City policy provides for the assessment of street improvement cost in the year the project is constructed,but delays the assessment for lateral sanitary sewer and water improvements for up to five years or until a property is connected. This reduces the initial impact of assessments to those properties with serviceable wells and septic systems. The placement of sanitary sewer and water in Eden Prairie Road to service the Charlson property would not result in immediate assessments to a neighborhood like Valley or Hilltop Road. It will, however, provide the opportunity for the neighborhood to consider the local improvements as an alternative to reconstructing 4 3 Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 wells and septic systems. • Are there cultural resources in the area ? There are historic buildings, structures, landscapes, and archaeology sites within or contiguous to the property. Cultural resources on the site will be reviewed in more detail by the Historic Preservation Commission. • Raquet Farmstead, 9380 Spring Road Site: HE-EPC-025 • Fredrick-Miller Spring, Spring Road(County Road 4) Site: HE-EPC-088 • Charlson Site, City owned property(55 acres) Site: HE-EPC -90 • Palmer Mounds, east end of the property Site:HE-EPC-A09 • Historic Landscape, Eden Prairie Road Site HE-EPC-079 • Archaeology Sites, 21-HE-0284 • Is there a need for a City park in the area? Does the plan provide an area for a future park? The Comprehensive Park Plan identifies a need for a 15-20 acre park in the area. Originally the Park and Recreation staff believed the most likely scenario was to locate a park on land acquired by MAC for the protection of the B Zone west of the airport. However MAC has recently indicated that a City park would not be acceptable. This means that land dedication or a combination of land dedication and cash park fees will be required. The park and recreation needs will be discussed at the Parks and Recreation Commission. • What impact will the airport have on the proposed plan? Land acquisition and airport noise zones will have an impact on the proposed plan. In January of 1996,the MAC approved a plan to acquire 280 acres. This covered all of Safety Zones A and B for the expanded airport and a hangar area south of the airport. If the airport expands as proposed, 194 acres of the Charlson property will be acquired by MAC. In August of 1997, the MAC held a public hearing to acquire the first 120 acres of this area. It includes all of the Safety Zone A and B for the existing airport, and Safety Zone A for the expanded airport,out to Eden Prairie Road. No further action has taken place to acquire the south side hangar area. If the airport does not expand, MAC still intends on acquiring property for the existing Runway Protection Zone and Safety Zone A out to Eden Prairie Road. Airport noise will be a factor in the development of the property. Any development 5 Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 will need to be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. Noise zones C and D overlay the property. For new development,single- family and multi-family with individual entrances are considered inconsistent within zone C, and conditional within zone D. Approximately half of the site shown for Church use is under zone C. Conditional uses require approval of the Met Council. The Long Term Comprehensive Plan for the airport was approved by the Met Council in 1996. In October of this year, the MAC began the EIS process. Completion of the EIS is tentatively scheduled for the spring of 1999. Construction could begin in 2000. The airport expansion proposal includes: • Extending the northerly east/west runway from 3,600 feet to 3,900 feet. • Extending the southerly east/west runway from 3,900 feet to 5,000 feet. • An additional south side hangar area. • Acquiring the acreage necessary to accommodate the proposal (MAC indicates 282 acres) In 1988 the City adopted Resolution 88-299 finding MAC's Long Term Comprehensive Plan alternative to extend the southerly east/west runway to 5,000 feet incompatible with Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Guide Plan. In 1992 the City adopted Resolution 92-124 which opposes the extension of runway 9R-27L When the Met Council approved the MUSA shift,it withheld approximately 30 acres. The 20 acres within the Charlson property is proposed for a mix of Office,Industrial, Medium Density Residential and Open Space use. This area is also part of the MAC acquisition area. This area cannot develop until the MAC acquires all necessary land for the expanded airport configuration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission believes there are compelling reasons for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan then one option would be to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Office,and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Office shall mean a minimum of 75% office use. This would allow for research and development or office showroom buildings similar to Southwest Crossing, or Edenvale Executive Park(interim City Hall) where buildings are one story brick and glass buildings. Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 The intent is to create a City West development. 2. Planned Unit Developments,Rezoning, Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plats shall meet City Code Requirements. 3. Traffic generation shall not exceed 9,138.5 daily trips. 2 I0 Memorandum • To: Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council Through: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources From: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: December 11, 1997 Subject: Supplemental Staff Report to the December 5, 1997 City Planner Report for the Charlson Property Guide Plan Change (Informational Meeting) BACKGROUND The staff has been reviewing a proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment proposed by Brett Hope and Dahigren, Shardlow, and Uban for future development of the Charlson property located west and southwest of Flying Cloud Airport. The proposal lists a number of different scenarios for realignment of roadways, as well as potential Guide Plan changes using a mixture of low density residential,medium density residential,office, and industrial, and public open space/parks/floodplain. The area is currently guided low density residential and public open space/park/floodplain. The intent is to examine the various park and natural resource issues that should be brought forward related to this proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. Park Development The City's Comprehensive Park Plan has identified the need for a neighborhood park in this area of the City. The park would need a 20 acre site, capable of supporting a number of active recreational facilities. These would include: • one regulation baseball field • two soccer fields • one tennis court and basketball court • three to four sand volleyball courts • adequate parking for 80 - 100 cars • hockey/skating facility with a park building • recreational play area The location for this neighborhood park would be preferred west of the current Spring Road. This would put the park in close proximity to the proposed trails and proposed residential neighborhoods. tl The staff is currently waiting for feedback from the Metropolitan Airports Commission as to whether or not a neighborhood park would be permitted within the "B" Zone of the proposed expansion of Flying Cloud Airport. If a neighborhood park would not be permitted in that area, the staff would evaluate other potential sites west of Spring Road for suitability as a neighborhood park site. • Bluff Preservation Currently, there are areas of this property that have slopes over 30%. City code states that no structures or accessory facilities except for stairways and landings will be placed within a bluff impact zones. One of the area where these steep slopes are present is adjacent to the existing Richard T. Anderson • Conservation Area. Within the Comprehensive Guide Plan being proposed, this area is designated as public. The other consideration to examine in this area is access to the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area in terms of utilization of future roads and/or parking areas that can serve as a trail head. Any trail access would be coordinated with the actual development as it occurs in the future. Creek Corridors Riley Creek flows through the property between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road. In this area the proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan shows public ownership. The staff would recommend that this public corridor be completed in one of two ways. The first would be to place scenic and conservation easements over the creek corridor and side slopes adjacent to the creek. This would ensure that no grading or tree removal would take place in the area immediately adjacent to the creek In addition to a scenic and conservation easement over the corridor, there would also be requirement of a trail easement to accommodate a trail along either side of the creek. At the present time it unclear which side would be preferable for location of a pedestrian trail. The second option for treating the creek corridor ownership would be to have the land platted as an outlot. This would allow the developer to gift the property to the City at some future date. In this case also, there would be a trail easement required if ownership was retained by the developer. Trails The City's Comprehensive Park and Open Space Plan indicates that any roads in this section of the City would also be desired locations for three meter(10')transportation bike/hikce trails. Most of the trails would be located along the collector roads and/or county roads. The exact location of these trails will depend on the road alignment, as well as topography adjacent to the road bed. It would be desirable to have a trail on both sides of the relocated Spring Road (County Road 4) from its connection with Eden Prairie Road southward to 212. The staff would recommend that any new road alignment for County Road 4 carry a trail on both sides of the new roadway. The proposed roadway through the area south of the airport would interconnect with 212 in the vicinity of the existing underpass. A spur trail will be necessary to connect pedestrian and biking traffic to that i2 underpass location. There is a triangular section of land that is in State ownership, which the City would need to seek easement documents from the State for connection of this spur trail. If the existing Spring Road remains as a county road, the City would have to evaluate the feasibility for placing a trail on one side of that road from the connection with the proposed through road southward to 212. Some of the ownership in this area is not part of the concept plan and, therefore, the location responsibility for building that trail will have to be determined as land develops. The trail corridor that was mentioned earlier along Riley Creek would be a vital of connecting to the single family residential area immediately west of this site. The elevation location for this proposed trail would have to be above the existing floodplain elevation so that periodic flooding does not jeopardize the trail or its users. OTHER NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES: Tree Loss Under the proposed plan there would be certain areas in which trees would be cut to make room for residential housing or grading for other sites such as the church. The impact for tree removal will be evaluated based the data that is obtained when each parcel comes in for PUD review. NURP Ponds This area would be served by several NURP ponds that would collect surface runoff and discharge it through a series of pipes into Riley Creek. The overall drainage plan will be reviewed by the Engineering Department to double check the calculations as well make recommendations for "regional" type of NURP pond system planned. The staff would recommend that the Commissioners ask any additional questions related to natural resource issues that may come to mind when this project is discussed. The current status is to explore as many possible options for development based on a number of different scenarios. It is also apparent that the Metropolitan Airports Commission expansion plans may impact this site in a variety of ways. The purpose of this discussion is to bring forward the natural resource issues so that they can be implemented at such time that development does begin to take place in this area of the City. Charlson.memo/Stuart97 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: December 5, 1997 SUBJECT: Charlson Property Guide Plan Change Public Informational Meeting APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Lynn Charlson LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road 1 It/ q J7 , d0I ram-( ¢ �o jr, ' r--j . /.. •. /\ ._.. 2 /I a LT 1 • /c:0351 T, Of I /1 y- ' '1 > iiii Y O J -,.'4\". bte48"1116 giti ill alb o 4 htukdwor,..wassix ...,,, log 1 1,440...___- . ;L....A, Aier .J it 1., ,.„ • , . O. so -\v of pR .!: �''", it :'1: , ' lD i \N( jp AO .. • s 1t1 AIM i .. *Ye -.1 r__v._ _ ._ ,k ,11114( 1J-.:-•'-" ., ,,\‘r -, 71- r:li(rM I c, u �713M�11M 1 l \\ day. a. - j� S 41 `.03i... _ c 1110° I • 0 o i o/13n iYd O WI - .' -' r i — — ' 1 ' U Adio • - i . f _ 1� a i idil0'‘4 r I M • Air _. , t. iim 1.1.----- 0 . 514, wh WORM IIIIIIIIIIIII am ---,..,40 MNII mum ..-: # r ' -''-'--- • . i; , , __ _. tli n IMP ..••• , ow; _ dr,„:,... . /,1 #°'/ .0 1 I 1 I 0 I 'M' AdA1,141171k t/ .,. a UMW mi ad) L j .______mosi &1147 , E ",, E1111.---Tlirr- / .11P • al . ,I Nis . . _,.,./.. 111 ,..., a15., , sk. All , 3 burawill pow 1 / '� M�'i,b3n / iiiimillil i k*4 ipth*orktimulilt bain104141 . , , Illismilmor I N 0313A , W Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change December 5, 1997 BACKGROUND The purpose of the public meeting is: 1. Presentation of a concept plan by Brett Hope and Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban for the future development of the Charlson property. 2. To hear comments from area residents on the proposed land use plan. 3. To identify development issues for the owner and staff to work on before returning to the Planning Commission at a future date for a public hearing. DEVELOPMENT REQUEST The property is currently guided Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The owner is proposing a land use change to a mixture of Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential, Office, Industrial, and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. PLANNING ISSUES • What are the significant natural resources on site? How does the plan preserve them? Riley Creek,Minnesota River Bluff, and wooded areas are the significant natural resources. The plan shows the land along Riley Creek and the Minnesota River Bluff as permanent open space. The City's shoreland ordinance requires a 100 foot structure setback and a"do not disturb" 50 foot shore impact zone for single family and a 150 foot structure setback and 75 foot shore impact zone for multiple family. Low density is proposed along the edge of an oak savannah woods. Units would be clustered at the top of the slopes to protect vegetation on the east side facing Riley Creek. Multiple family,office,and industrial uses with larger building and parking requirements are proposed in the areas without vegetation. • What are comptabitable land uses next to existing residential neighborhoods ? Are the proposed land uses compatible? Low density residential, church and open space can be compatible land uses. The proposed land use plan shows low density residential next to existing low density residential along Eden Prairie Road south of Riley Creek. Between Valley Road and Riley Creek the proposed land use is low density residential\public open space. If the airport purchases this area, the land will be open space. 2 '(I Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change December 5, 1997 The Grace Church has purchased approximately 50 acres opposite homes on Valley and Hilltop Road. This land would be designated church. No plans have been submitted to the City for review. The site is large enough to construct a church campus similar to Wooddale or Pax Christi. The residential densities are similar and compatible with existing neighborhoods. The church can be compatible provided the plan has large setbacks,berming, landscaping with a relocated Eden Prairie Road and upgraded Pioneer Trail. • What are compatible land uses next to the airport? Does the proposed plan show compatible land uses? Office, industrial, and open space are compatible uses. The plan shows office, industrial uses, and open space uses located adjacent to the airport. If the airport purchases the land it will be open space. • What are the housing goals for the City? How does the proposed plan help meet housing goals? General city housing goals are to provide a v xiety of housing and lifestyle choices. There is a need for senior one level walkout housing. The proposed plan for low density and multiple family residential will allow for a variety of housing types and styles to be built. Cluster,one level walkout housing is appropriate on wooded and sloped sites. Units can be clustered to maximize the amount of preserved open space. Affordable attached housing can be built in the proposed multiple family areas. • What is the capacity of roads in the area? Is the proposed plan consistent with road capacity? If not, what road improvements are required? The 1997 Transportation Plan projects a total of 25,000 daily trips for the land recently added to the MUSA Line. The proportional share of traffic allocated to this site is 7,637 trips. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses,there are several development scenarios. Scenario 4 is what the owner believes will be the mostly likely end use of the site given land purchase by the airport. All traffic forecasts are above the transportation forecasts. The City has commissioned a traffic consultant to identify the traffic impacts on roads in the area and required road improvements. • 11 Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change December 5, 1997 • Are proposed road alignments consistent with the City's transportation plan? The proposed road alignments shown on the Charlson plan are in some ways consistent with the City's transportation plan and in other ways not consistent. The Charlson plan shows the southerly end of Eden Prairie Road disconnected from TH 212 and connected to CSAH 4 north of TH212. While not shown on the transportation plan,there are some positive aspects to this change. The intersection would be eliminated along TH212 which should improve the safety of this corridor. The probability that Eden Prairie Road would be used as an alternative to CSAH 4 for trips between CSAH 1 and TH212 would be significantly reduced. This is an appropriate change considering the land use adjacent to Eden Prairie Road is residential. The Charlson plan also proposes a realignment of CSAH 4 through the Charlson property to intersect with TH212 near Flying Cloud Airport. This would result in the southerly segment of existing Spring Road becoming a city street. The proposed new road alignment through the Charlson property to serve it's development is appropriate. Switching the designation of CSAH 4 from Spring Road to this new road alignment is probably not appropriate considering the functional classification for CSAH 4 and travel patterns between TH212 and CSAH 1. The realignment of the intersection of CSAH 4 with CSAH 1 from its current location and a common intersection will Mitchell Road westerly to a common intersection with the north leg of CSAH 4 is consistent with the City's transportation plan and a desirable change. This provides for better continuity along CSAH 4 which is classified as an arterial roadway. This will reduce the likelihood that arterial level traffic is transferred to Mitchell Road which is a local collector. • Will the sanitary sewer and water main facility plan for the Charlson property serve other properties? A system of liftstations and force main will be necessary to provide sewer service in this area. The main elements of both the sanitary sewer and water distribution systems will follow existing corridors like Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. Ultimately, existing neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road will receive service from the same system's that serve the Charlson property. Historically, the city has considered extending sewer and water service into neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road when there is a request for service from a significant number of existing property owners in the neighborhood. Current City policy provides for the assessment of street improvement cost in the year the project is constructed,but delays the assessment for lateral sanitary sewer and water improvements for up to five years or until a property is connected. This reduces the initial impact of assessments to those properties with serviceable wells and septic 4 Staff Report Charison Guide Plan Change December 5, 1997 systems. The placement of sanitary sewer and water in Eden Prairie Road to service the Charison property would not result in immediate assessments to a neighborhood like Valley or Hilltop Road. It will, however, provide the opportunity for the neighborhood to consider the local improvements as an alternative to reconstructing wells and septic systems. • Are there cultural resources on site? There are historic buildings, structures, landscapes, and archaeology sites within or contiguous to the property. Cultural resources on site will be reviewed in more detail by the Historic Preservation Commission. • Raquet Farmstead, 9380 Spring Road Site: HE-EPC-025 • Fredrick-Miller Spring, Spring Road(County Road 4) Site: HE-EPC-088 • Charlson Site, City owned property(55 acres) Site: HE-EPC -90 • Palmer Mounds, east end of the property Site:HE-EPC-A09 • Historic Landscape, Eden Prairie Road Site HE-EPC-079 • Archaeology Sites, 21-HE-0284 • Is there a need for a City park in the area? Does the plan provide an area for a future park? The Comprehensive Park Plan identifies a need for a 15-20 acre park in the area. Originally the Park and Recreation staff believed the most likely scenario was to locate a park on land acquired by MAC for the protection of the B Zone west of the airport. However MAC has recently indicated that a City park would not be acceptable. This means that land dedication or a combination of land dedication and cash park fees will be required.The park and recreation needs will be discussed at the Parks and Recreation Commission. • What impact will the airport have on the proposed plan? Land acquisition and airport noise zones will have an impact on the proposed plan. In January of 1996,the MAC approved a plan to acquire 280 acres. This covered all of Safety Zones A and B for the expanded airport and a hangar area south of the airport. If the airport expands as proposed, 194 acres of the Charlson property will be acquired by MAC. In August of 1997, the MAC held a public hearing to acquire the first 120 acres of this area. It includes all of the Safety Zone A and B for the existing airport, and Safety Zone A for the expanded airport,out to Eden Prairie Road. No further action has taken place to acquire the south side hangar area. 5 '' Staff Report Charlson Guide Plan Change December 5, 1997 If the airport does not expand, MAC still intends on acquiring property for the existing Runway Protection Zone and Safety Zone A out to Eden Prairie Road. Airport noise will be a factor in the development of the property. Any development will need to be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. Noise zones C and D overlay the property. For new development,single- family and multi-family with individual entrances are considered inconsistent within zone C, and conditional within zone D. Approximately half of the site shown for Church use is under zone C. Conditional uses require approval of the Met Council. The Long Term Comprehensive Plan for the airport was approved by the Met Council in 1996. In October of this year, the MAC began the EIS process. Completion of the EIS is tentatively scheduled for the spring of 1999. Construction could begin in 2000. The airport expansion proposal includes: • Extending the northerly east/west runway from 3,600 feet to 3,900 feet. • Extending the southerly east/west runway from 3,900 feet to 5,000 feet. • An additional south side hangar area. • Acquiring the acreage necessary to accommodate the proposal (MAC indicates 282 acres) Resolution MAC's LongTerm In 1988 the City adopted88-299finding Comprehensive Plan alternative to extend the southerly east/west runway to 5,000 feet incompatible with Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Guide Plan. In 1992 the City adopted Resolution 92-124 which opposes the extension of runway 9R-27L When the Met Council approved the MUSA shift,it withheld approximately 30 acres. The 20 acres within the Charlson property is proposed for a mix of Office,Industrial, Medium Density Residential and Open Space use. This area is also part of the MAC acquisition area. This area cannot develop until the MAC acquires all necessary land for the expanded airport configuration. ACC —- __4 ,..........„: ------------"-:::-------- -------7---------- ----R/OA, i 1 ,, CHARLSON = _ J 0 I ' . o 3 4 0 1 2. i ...• ......., ea cz.a o 0 p 0 0 0 0 PRO PE IR-Th' , 0 . 3 0 ] .0 c' o 0 A 0 ea EDEN PRAIRIE , , ..• i hlINNESOTA i 41***6----,„„„,„, •41011k . _ _,. .-, - . : 3 „, , 3 D 0 cl --:: .... _Ak - . ,• -,-- . ,. 0. ... 1 L. MS Noldie VONES ilt . ii ililli " 7.,----7T7 Mt' ea IlAtip AgyOUISITION ---------_ . OP SP I: NG CLOUD -fink iiiiii Irtiltrifliii / /at 17/7"i'• - , AIRPOR PROPOSED GUIDE PLAN .! , . c likkiimilti!c: 3. ijo t =5-258 Acres = Residential 25 u/c >--,`',&10PP:- -.- ," • 26-101Acres = Residerrnal 7.0 u/a / '42;'\,,t1 :;- -; .:';:; ,..7:r. ;,,:7- _,--A., _ • 86-95 Acres IMI Office/Industrial - -- -- AIL- : t!,: 27_189 Acres Ft.-:7.,2;) Public Open Space 1 -.;•7''.?>‘:-. I:7 ,: :;Ako- 0 • \-,',-.,-_-,1,;,.":1. = ,, ,.,,,,,..,,..._;_r.;,,__;-,,27.-.2:-_,:„:'-_---,,f---_,.-7 — ' 1 I I 45-50 Acres EM Church 151..z VI 1 ; int ft Proposed Oty Rood -31/4;;;;; '4'4 '-'-/- .. ,•11 -.41•,... --;- '"I":‘*''' -' ----,-- •-,-7,--;---_ -;‘' --..- 1 . I • I ,`,-. '-`';- !; : •"^"r ;;-'.:•-',.. `. 1 1 10 Acres ---- Relocated Co Rd.4 a • , • ..-fer!--: 0 , .4,,,,L,, . ,.- -- , _:_,.._ -_; - _-,.--):- _ -,,- -•,---. i 1. I -.2.1 Shoreline Dtstrat 12-6 r))4 i . - 1 "9 . . _ , ...4....* , .-- - ..:- --: ..,,.e-- - '' - - ! , e' : 1 i • r 4. • If excess affic capocIty becomes 4-','7 , 44' ''' ' ----;;-' ,.... -. .-' '..,: s;1/2 ..-,.,:,,' , i ,2 ' • available as determined bv the CITY. -3 • ', ,.,' i , --1/4., ...,,,;;-f, :,-A---,,„-.....- ___- ,-.. V'••e`• - I ..... —:.....11 , _ 3 . ,t '1' a"-- • o • -i_11 4— ... ' ' '-a-kfil—T—REN ,,Ak:;=,krz-4-1_-77-7.7:7-7.. ,";:';_7;;;;;",. --.....,___,7,..4,-; ..4-.; .._-'- -' ,., ,,,;',.." •-41, , _,-.--- . i SHARDLOW• r 9 - ,h.v.,-,-,,_ ,..--;.-f,-..,----.-‘,...-,::::,- 7,:-..,,, '--,•,:.,:--i--- ---,-..--.._,--....--,3t...- ;AND•UBAN asensew ':\ 1.. •' '77 .......-,, -7/ ir•gio.'- :_- , , NORTH • - *.:-.-;_--,---.,:.---- -,-:7,--,;:.,--1•`--:._-:•--- :__------ 212 ' •... =. , +=............ ,, + ! L..--11 . / _____________:................L../ • ___ _ — 0' 800' 1600' • 27 Ocrober 1997 •ii" • •3 : MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY _ -- • 4r gAza.,_. ..-tVit :-/ . _..,.c. ,....n.• , .7--- MET* c0101.1CIL NOISE 1°14E5 MAC. ACQUISITION i " ERIo a f c, ri (i i a�d J o ; 0 9 a O a CHALSO r�� O o0 a POPE ---- r r� oo o t c0. 0 . , -z.:V.1,:IA!',:,,L.';W 7.2.,:.:!.S-) x _ Y ,a O EDEN PRAIRIE `V .•� -,-1 755 • �, �; s ,v; iz� ...., I MINNESOTA . ,, , � .. .., 1 � f�G-�ZS , 146,4°,0- ,--:-/-4'...„.„-; ::,,,,,,,;‘..-::::4•:.-.1, -,..iial, :,•,____7_ g i 6 gi, -.----:,_,1 j L____ E%CEvnaw I -CUING CLOUD /444_ /i; Il AIRPOR ail Iflit/ i' iu 1 1 A ' , , a- 1 4fil„ r__''',,,.;f.,•:'''''',,,..;,.'.'''T.,...,,,';': ,,.,,.'rs. \‘‘ 1:- - �` I r PROPOSED GUIDE PLAN _ __ ____i_ ---": _ 55-258Acre5 c -, ,� t e — — G Residential 25 u/c __ __1 26 101 AcresReslderM 17 O J \y± K Yi $. ,� III IIIi « �'4 �, t T- f° h7 P, .. �- n ;. z �z ��r - _�, I 0-86 Acres r 86-95 Acres Office/Industrial air O 0 +ite , a .. �i- T', ' r �7 ;7 a �'F ,"" .1 M 7 S c . ' i� ' 21-189 Acres F { * ° t e fi } .i ht t Public Open Space ,,,,,-,-- . . _' - r '' k'.,+ ,,1 r- y� r 1 t r,�: ; - 45-50 Acres b::J'. Church I ; ,,,„::.., , i{ �� t 1.,Ix� ib 'I ,S'�r _ 1 i:-.,-•,l y9^ :•• # -.:,° ' _ A Proposed City Roc, - I Iner"_ , �i^ > y erg,, , "ti�� �b�.i,:z- e �f x iH , A. 1 L _ 4 . now 1 j 10 Acres Relocated C.o 4 ft;11er 1,OP' ••••,,,,,tri,,-„, ,•,•,,,,,..,,,,••,,_„._, .„.,,.. „._•• �& USr" is Jis r Shoreline Dish�r r T:r, 4 4�' s v,,. k�y Q4 4' � '*' ,,,I 7I: * G If excess traffic capacity becomes ate. �` `�" gif # y �n"1 nik 1 , available as determined by the Chy, ❑ + a -�u+,•, z _ rtr 1tk' n a a .-': a ; • Il1u � ELi /. .„ , ,,,, 1 ❑ "p �\ S:f_ tt mac+ .,{ [• l-a 'b . 'y y'i.'. .. 1 } L--- ._ I �Q .y t E"fA 1 • ~ -.-, G '" DAHLGREN; d s f, l`F IlY :;- Y„' . 1 •e -E-,;, i --- -- �HARDLOWI �o i t-,_ 1 r-! AND•UBANI , . 0 , -,.,,I,--1.-L .,..;.;;_-7,?!i...,.;.:,,-,..:,-1 ,,,.,:;,,-,.43,;-.‘1,..li•2. -i",-,-- _----- -i 2 ‘1, •,, k 4, •11 ____________ --- t• mrimew .r.-__...._______--2_-- _,. .i\IN,__________________‘ . “,.....„...,.......... ...,:r. .::„,;;;;•.; • NO RT I r ' 800' 160 E 1 * 'h -'-,'',.�''�•yy. MINNESOTA RIVER VALLEY GUL�V KA�/ RIO n, f�1��� w��it'�a. . • 27 October 199" '4 r a .7 . q ARHEOL.ObAL ir r " 7 �'7 7%.-, .P tti''' A-4 . #n :4=:". , ,r,..1 -";. r '^t _c. t 4 _ ' e, `y,.: �^r� 3fl•.�.'Y— ,•.V,J2'•t'r�?nJfF:r3!:r'- - rC;:ry +M.�.,. - ' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April27, 1998 Page 4 B. CHARLSON PROPERTY by Lynn Charlson. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,medium Density Residential, and Office on 440 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. C. BROWN PROPERTY by David Brown. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan changes from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and office on 11.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. D. STANDAL PROPERTY by Carol and John Standal. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential, and office on 24.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail,west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. Fr n7en stated staff has requested the Planning Commission to review Items B,C,and D together as they comprise one project. He noted the proponents had requested separate review in case oiportion of the project should be denied. John Uban representing all three proponents, reviewed the project's history and described the final plan they have submitted for approval. The land is located to the south and west of Flying Cloud Airport. He discussed the existing roads and the new roadway system they are proposing. They are also proposing to connect Eden Prairie Road with Spring Lake Road and close the access onto Highway 212, which would direct the major portions of the traffic onto the new roadway which will gain access farther to the east. This roadway will also serve the airport expansion areas as well. He discussed the Guide Plan Amendments they are proposing which he hoped would be approved. The airport will be acquiring portions of this property for their expansion, and he indicated these areas on the plans. He noted they are actively pursuing acquisition at this time but no formal offers have been tendered. He discussed the proposed uses that will be in which areas of the site. They are proposing office/commercial uses adjacent to the airport. He showed a plan which would be the land use designations they believe are the most appropriate and most likely to happen. He stated they have been working with adjacent landowners to develop the best plan possible for this area which will give some flexibility and be the best way to develop this area. Clinton asked about the relocation of Spring Road and what it would be and Uban responded the road from Pioneer Trail to Highway 212 is a larger roadway to handle more of the traffic which will preserve the existing Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road as much as possible. Clinton asked about the connection between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road and if this issue had been resolved. Uban responded they have 23 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 5 two ways to make this connection and it has not yet been studied by the City to determine which way will be the best way to do this. Foote asked what type of industrial uses would be adjacent to the airport and Uban responded it will probably be corporate headquarters or office buildings on 40-plus care sites. It would not be heavy industrial uses. Dom asked what the airport would do with the land and Uban responded that they need it to have a safety zone and install some lights. There would not be a major change in the terrain from modifications they would make. The area south of the airport will be used for corporate hangars and a ponding area will also be included in this portion of the site. This level will be on the same level as the present airport, and the remaining land between this point and Highway 212 will terrace down to the lower elevation. Dom asked about where the single family housing would be located on the western portion of the site and Uban reviewed the site plan and described the landscaping in this area. Dorn asked if the airport was agreeable to the proposed alignment of the roadway through their property from the church to the south and Uban responded that they have not yet purchased this land but they have been working with them to be sure they participate in the design of this system to facilitate good planning for the City. Discussion ensued regarding the roadway elevations adjacent to the airport and the amount of clearance required for aircraft at the end of the runway. Franzen noted there were two alternatives for roadway alignments. A decision can't be made at a concept level of planning. Final road locations are done at the Rezoning stage when more detailed information is available. Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of all three projects. The density will be limited to the roadway capacity. The Public Hearing was opened. Eileen Benz,9775 Spring Road,stated her home is sandwiched between both projects and she is opposed to both. She was concerned about the roadway configurations, noise levels, lighting and other impacts from the development. She was concerned about the light industrial uses and exactly what that would be. She noted that there was concern for the impact of these uses on the new properties that were being developed, and asked that the Planning Commission give the same concern to the existing properties as the project developed. Gray described the traffic levels they anticipate on the new roadways and noted they anticipate very little change from what is there now. It is possible that they could have the primary point of ingress/egress from Highway 212. There will be an increase of traffic on Spring road because it is a County Road and it is part of the transportation system in the region. Staff anticipates that Spring Road will remain a two lane road although a significant one. It will probably stay that way for the next twenty years. Sandstad asked about the connection with Highway 212 and if they would have a stop 24 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 6 sign or signal there because that intersection is located on a hill. Gray responded that they would like to have a signal and this could result in some work being done on Highway 212 to level out that hill. He described the elevations in the area and the relationship between the new runway and the new roadway. Gray discussed the proposed connection between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road and the reasons why this should be done. They would be improving major access spacing and preserving the character of Eden Prairie Road. By making this connection it will eliminate Eden Prairie Road as a through road. There are also some opportunities to work with MAC to improve the number of access points by perhaps creating a frontage road along the airport. Hibbert Hill, 10131 Eden Prairie Road,was concerned about sewer and water coming in and if he would be assessed. Gray stated it would be coming in but he could not say what the assessment would be for his property because there were many variables included in the assessment formula. Hill was concerned about having people from the industrial area access Spring Road and Gray responded that it was a County road and from a safety standpoint it was best to have more than one connection for this new roadway. Staff anticipates that most of the traffic will use the new road and not Spring Road. Hill asked about the water rationing and commented that now they are extending the areas of service and whether that was a conflict. Gray stated the City is bringing the new water plant on line but water restrictions will be used to control peak demand times to assure an adequate water supply. Eden Prairie has a more than adequate water supply for the community. Hill inquired if he would be able to opt out of the sewer and water expansion and Gray responded that the Metropolitan Council's philosophy was that all communities should move toward the expansion of utilities. Hill stated he had not been consulted by the developers of the project and they stated they had met with the neighbors. He felt that their rights were being ignored by the proponents of the development. Gray stated this project was still at the concept level and not a finely detailed plan which means that they look at what most residents would want in the way of transportation systems. There is flexibility to determine details as the plan is developed in the future. Franzen stated that Staff held a neighborhood meeting at the Planning Commission meeting last December and the plan was not satisfactory which is why they came back to the Planning Commission with this proposal. Habicht asked what Hill thought of this plan aside from the roadway issues and Hill responded that as long as they were aware they were giving up the last part of natural land in Eden Prairie, it was a good plan. Jim Van Winkle, 10129 Eden Prairie Road,stated he did not understand how the City could make the connection from Eden Prairie Road across private land to Spring Road. He felt it was absolutely foolish to put housing at the end of a runway especially multiple family housing,because of all the difficulties they were having in Richfield with the MSP airport. Bert Noterman,owner of The Lion's Tap Restaurant, stated he also owned ten acres north of that site. He planned to have residential housing on this land. He was PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April27, 1998 Page 7 adjacent to this development site and was not contacted regarding this project. He wanted to be sure that his property was protected. He was concerned about roadway access to his property so he could develop it later on without having to damage the trees. Regarding the issue of airport expansion, he was aware that it was going to happen. He was concerned if it would create a greater hazard by closing the access onto Eden Prairie Road than if it were left open. He was concerned about access to his business and how the road reconfiguration would impact that. Dennis Davie, 9900 Spring Road, stated he felt the proponents had done a good job in planning the project but there were some things that were confusing. The roadway configuration changes were the most confusing. He discussed traffic flow patterns in the area now and stated he was concerned about the added traffic from the new development being added to it. Gray stated while there is some cut-through traffic onto Eden Prairie Road today,the majority of trips stay on Spring Road. These are details that will be worked out with the final plans. The grades will have an impact on the roadway configuration. He discussed the Highway 212 intersection with Spring Road and explained why it was a better connection than Eden Prairie Road would be. David stated he had abundant wildlife in his yard,and felt that single family homes along Eden Prairie Road should be supported. He did not agree with the medium density housing area that was being proposed. He had to get a variance to have his home and he felt the density proposed was too great a volume for this area of Eden Prairie. He was also concerned about the designated office/industrial use being proposed. Franzen stated the proposed land use designation would require the buildings be 75% office and 25%industrial,or it would be possible to have a multi-story office building on that site. He reviewed the standards for this zoning district and noted that staff wanted to preserve as many natural features as possible. John Standal stated he was one of the proponents of the development and he and his wife had a tree farm on this property for the last twenty years. They now feel it is time for a change in their lifestyle and they want to reduce their workload. He requested the Planing Commission to approve the project. Gene Gray, 9040 Sunrise Circle, stated he was opposed to the project and felt Eden Prairie did not need another industrial park or more housing. He urged the Planning Commission to deny the project and requested the City to purchase the land and dedicate it to the Audubon Society. Habicht asked if he would support this measure as a taxpayer, and Gray responded he would if the price was right. Gray stated the owners of the property were the proponents of this development but the City has also had some plans regarding how they believed this area should be developed. MAC has stipulated to the City that the land adjacent to the airport should not be residential in character. Sandstad commented he thought it was a very nice property and it would be nice to have a large budget and be able to purchase the land as suggested by Mr. Gray. However, it would be difficult to come up with the $2 Million plus in funding it would take to purchase these properties, and it was not � C� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 8 practical to deny the project on that basis. Lloyd Walin, 9978 Windsor Terrace, commented that if the property which is proposed to be developed as industrial would have traffic coming from the south it might also have traffic coming from the north as well. It was his understanding that the City Council had taken a position that the airport expansion should not take place. Foote commented that the City has opposed the expansion but the City does not have any say in it if MAC comes up with the funding to purchase the land. Sandstad stated this plan works both ways and the Planning Commission has supported the City Council position regarding the airport expansion issue. Vicky Small, 1655 Beverly Drive, stated MAC has a history of not holding up it's agreements with the City and she wanted to know if there were any legal documents that would hold them to this. Gray responded that historically the realignment of Spring Road has been part of the City's transportation plan for twenty years. In this plan it is a critical element and we need to have further discussion as to how this will be implemented. This realignment could be a 1999 project as well as the new roadway and the connection to Highway 212. This should be made a condition of approval for the developer. This would be included in the Developer's Agreement if the plan should be approved then MAC would have to honor these things if they acquire the land before the project is completed. Severin Peterson, 15900 Flying Cloud Drive, stated he lives at the northeast corner of Highway 212 and Spring Road. He has not seen the plan before tonight and his interest is in compatibility with the proposed development. He could relate to some of the concerns voiced by the neighbors and his family has a lot of history in the area. Things have changed in Eden Prairie and it will continue to change. He requested a meeting with the proponents to share his concerns. He was concerned about the impacts of the roadway changes, and safety issues were also of great importance. Loren Wattke, 16860 Flying Cloud Drive, stated he no longer uses the Eden Prairie Road access onto Highway 212 because it is too dangerous and he was glad it was going to be closed off. He has received the impression that the City has given up regarding the issue of the airport expansion and since all of southern Eden Prairie was going to be impacted by MAC,he felt it should not be taken lightly. If the airport is expanded there will be some large planes coming into Eden Prairie and he asked the City again to oppose the expansion. Alexander stated she thought the plan was good for the area but was sad to see the open area go. The homes that were going to be built in this area will be impacted by Flying Cloud airport and even if it does not expand there will be noise impacts from it on these homes. She was not sure that the plan should go ahead now or if it needed to have more refinement. Sandstad stated it was a very large project but it was a concept plan. He was opposed to the airport expansion. He supported the proposal and was comfortable with the project as proposed. Habicht concurred and noted that some of the more intense uses PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 9 on the south side were dependent on the new roadway which he wanted to know if the roadway was going to be built. Gray responded that the project should be approved with the stipulation that the roadway be there to support this type of land use. The proponents wil have to work with MnDOT to get this done prior to proceeding with the development. Franzen stated the Developers Agreement will identify the land uses,types of uses, and the roadways that will have to be built prior to implementation of the project. Habicht responded he was comfortable with the changes to the Guide Plan with this type of provision included in the Developers Agreement. Lewis stated she was comfortable with the mix of uses in concept. In this area with the proximity to the airport industrial is the best use of that land. The City will have final review and approval of what will go there. The Eden Prairie Road/Highway 212 intersection was very hazardous and she was in favor of closing it. Clinton stated he was not 100%in favor of the airport expansion and he was well aware of the noise that emanates from the airport. There will not be a significant change in the size of the planes that use the airport regardless of whether it expands or not. A concept plan is not always what is built on a given site. He supported the concept plan as proposed. Dom stated he supported the concept plan,particularly the access location change onto Highway 212. Foote stated he agreed with the other Commissioners and supported the Concept Plan. Specific details will be worked out as each phase of the project moves forward. He was opposed to the airport expansion and he has concerns about MAC wanting to expand the airport even further in the future. Franzen stated that staff would have a definition for office and multi-family residential use prior to City Council review of the project, so they will know what is expected. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION:Sandstad moved,seconded by Clinton,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Lynn Charlson for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Office on 440 acres based on Plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Dorn, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of David Brown for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and office on 11.4 acres based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. ag PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 10 MOTION: Habicht moved, seconded by Alexander, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Carol and John Standal for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Office on 24.4 acres based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. 29 Planning Commission Minutes December 8, 1997 IV. PUBLIC MEETING A. CHARLSON PROPERTY by Lynn Chari3on. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial,Office and Industrial on 440 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. Franzen explained this is an informational meeting. Due to the size of the project and the issues that are involved, it was better to proceed in a number of steps with the Planning Commission,the first being a meeting to familiarize the Planning Commission and the neighborhood with what the project is all about, and to identify things to work on for the next time it comes back to the Planning Commission. Brett Hope, representing Charlson Property, presented the history and background surrounding the Lynn Charlson Property. He noted that he and his wife run the golf course on the south end of the property and handle all the issues regarding the property. John Uban, representing Charlson Property, explained that based on the different patterns of land acquisition and what happens on the surrounding property,they should pursue a Comprehensive Plan amendment that offers some flexibility not only for the landowners to sell,but flexibility that the City can feel there are options available as this piece of property develops. This is not just an airport issue but it's really how to develop and plan for all the land around the airport itself. He reviewed an outlined map of the entire property highlighting the agricultural patterns, the steep slopes around Riley Creek, the airport, Highway 212,the contour lines,and the area which the church has purchased. He showed the adjacent land uses on another map and pointed out the area to the south has been purchased by the Parks Department. He said when the MUSA line was expanded in August,the Met Council chose to keep out 20 acres of land and that it was their theory of protecting the airport;therefore,part of their request is to include this in the MUSA line so it will be a change of about 20 acres for inclusion in the MUSA line. He reviewed another map and highlighted the natural features of the site which included the oak woods. He noted all these sites will be maintained and 2 36 Planning Commission Minutes December 8, 1997 kept within the City's guidelines. They found the rolling character supported residential development,except the area to the north,which means they have to plan for buffering and transition areas. Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road have been proposed to be connected because the intersection was an unsafe intersection. This connection with Eden Prairie Road can be either eliminated or reduced to a limited access. An archeological review was done because there were some reported mounds next to the airport but none was found. There is one spot adjacent to the park that the City purchased that does have an Indian mound but it's in a perfect place for preservation and can be incorporated very easily. They also looked at other features of the area such as reported relics of homesteads and found there was nothing of great historical significance from the State Historical Society. Many of the old trails running down to the river will be maintained for historical purposes. There are a variety of development patterns that would meet the City goals and housing policies and economic policy developments. He discussed the various traffic patterns discovered and the different land uses within the property. He presented and explained six possible land use scenarios that would work with any situation. He said number#4 appeared to be the most probable land use that will happen. Each of the scenarios give the City flexibility so they don't have to keep going back to the Met Council every time they want to do something. Sandstad commented about scenario #1 and #2. He hopes that the Flying Cloud Airport expansion does not occur so he's not presuming that option#4 will most likely occur. Habicht asked if it's fair to say the church on the north and the low density residential to the west of Riley Creek will be in all the plans. than said yes. Habicht asked if any proposed office or industrial will probably be to the east of the relocated road and adjacent to the airport. Uban replied yes. Foote asked if the airport has a timetable as to when they are supposed to make the decision on this. Uban replied they said they would have this acquired by the end of the year for the primary "A" Zone for the existing runway. Foote said the medium density,based on the traffic study, could possibly go to some more affordable detached housing situation. He asked if they have 3 3 ' Planning Commission Minutes December 8, 1997 given that any consideration. Uban replied they would try and work that out if it's something desired by the City. The public meeting was opened. Dean Edstrom, 10133 Eden Prairie Road, showed where he lives on the map and noted he served on the City Council a number of years ago. He has lived here 24 years and is very familiar with the area. He said he was shocked to discover a City road is planned dividing the property he owns. He will fight it all the way. He was not opposed to this development but was opposed to his property being divided. He was also concerned about adding traffic to Eden Prairie Road up and down Riley Creek right in front of his house because it's one of the most dangerous curves in the City. The traffic patterns down there should remain as they are or seek improvement by accentuating traffic on County Road 4. He believes it is important to maintain County Road 4 coming down the existing route otherwise it will accentuate traffic moving up Eden Prairie Road which is worse. He said they need to look at the environmental issues carefully because there are a lot of terrains, steep slopes and oak trees in there. He also suggested some gift giving on the part of the developer such as a Charlson Park. Gary Schmidt, representing the Metropolitan Airport Commission, commented there is a great concern for them that there not be any residential development near the south parcel runway. They try to keep as much traffic to the south as they can. Any residential area in that area will have significant impacts to the airport whether or not they have any acquisition. The other concern the City has expressed to them is the traffic density along Spring Road. Even if they develop the airport and have the hangar area,there was a lot of concern of the acquisition to 212 and they have to develop some type of improved access to 212. Sandstad commented after closely studying MAC's own noise contours,they don't show any to the south. Schmidt said they are looking at a State standard for noise standard. It does parcel the runway;however,there is going to be impact to the residents if there is residential development to the southwest. They are trying to keep as much traffic away from the residential development as possible. Foote asked if there was anything attached to the noise abatement plan that 4 32- Planning Commission Minutes December 8, 1997 should stop development in that area. Schmidt said no. It's just stating there will be noise there and they are trying to do something about it. It wasn't directed at this specific parcel of property. Bill Small, 16525 Beverly Drive,noted he lives right across Eden Prairie Road near the designated residential area. He expressed concern about the different traffic patterns to Eden Prairie Road. He was concerned about tree loss as a result of sewer and water which gives a nice urban feel. He noted he has attended meetings about Flying Cloud Airport expansion and stated he does not want to see that happen. They need to get a group of people together to consider acquiring that land so the airport can't get it. Foote was concerned about what control the City has over the type of industrial facilities that will develop. Franzen reviewed the different industrial developments in Eden Prairie noting the Commission can zone it industrial with restrictions of 75 percent office which is very light industrial. Ismail was concerned about how the different scenarios presented would effect future traffic studies. Gray said this is a growing metropolitan area projected to grow to around 2.5 million people in the next 25 years. These roads are going to have traffic on them no matter what happens. The Commission had a brief discussion about what direction should be given to the developer. Clinton said he would like a study done on the traffic generation if the area were zoned office or light industrial which would have people living and commuting to work in Eden Prairie. He asked if the recent traffic study done considered traffic from other communities going through Eden Prairie. Gray said in the study most recently done they did consider that. Sandstad commented the traffic issues have already been mentioned which are a big item such as the change to the south end of Eden Prairie Road which would divide the one property owner's land. Discussions need to be done concerning that and it could occur after tonight's meeting. An active park with things like walking trails would be needed here. He said he would like to see larger plans next time so they can read the elevations. He would also like to see more information on some affordable housing in the project. He liked option #3 because it shows some medium density housing. The developer should meet with the adjoining property owners to work out details. He liked the concept and is interested in seeing a lot more detail. 5 Planning Commission Minutes December 8, 1997 Wissner concurred with Sandstad. It's very early on but she would vote on option#3 as the one she likes the most at this point. Foote could not pick one scenario that he liked best because there are too many variables there. He liked the location of the church and it goes along well with the single family housing across the street. He would prefer more of an office type situation than industrial if it's guided industrial. It concerns him as to what could possibly go there if it's industrial. He believes some kind of connection is needed on the loop road. He suggested possibly relocating it on the Charlson property itself as to not effect any other land owners. He would also like to see a housing mix that is a little more diverse. They are addressing medium density residential and low density residential but he would like to see something more in the affordable single family housing incorporated into the middle area. Habicht agreed with all the comments made. It's a little early to pick a scenario but he suggested, as they move forward, that they make the assumption that the airport will not take any of this land as they look at it from a traffic related standpoint. Alexander said after looking at the aerial photograph and all the good planning that has been done, there is still going to be a lot of tree loss and probably some wetlands will have to be filled in. Her concern is trying to hold on to what they already have in Eden Prairie. They need to look at some affordable housing for low to moderate income. She was also concerned about the people living in the homes near the airport being unhappy with the noise from the airport. Franzen said they are taking this to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Historical Preservation Commission to get their input into the plan which will be incorporated into the next set of plans that come back to the Planning Commission. 6 '314 Memorandum To: Mike Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Senior Planner From: Stuart A..Fox Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: May 5, 1998 Subject: Summary of the May 5, 1998 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting The following projects were reviewed at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on May 5, 1998. The cotes and comments are as follows: • Fuller Road Business Center The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The plan was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission commented that they prefer to replace the cottonwood trees with some like trees. • Charlson, Brown and Standal Properties The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The proposed development was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The information contained in the supplemental staff report includes the specific information regarding three park issues as follows: 1. To have public/open space designation cross hatched on the salmon colored area of the proposed Guide Plan change. This was recommended earlier and was not shown on this proposed submission. 2. The area adjacent to the Standal property should be designated as public open space 150 feet from the center line of the Riley Creek. - 3. Road Connection: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the wording that was included in the supplemental staff report. In addition, they felt that an option three should also be considered when the transportation study is done for connecting Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. This option would be a right in, right out connection from Eden Prairie Road to 212. SAF:mdd Franzen.memo/Stuart98 3S M`NNES°T' Minnesota De ._,tment of Transportation 9 n ^,r �5`g Metropolitan Division °`T� Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 January 5, 1998 • Mark Ryan Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 - 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 Dear Mark Ryan: SUBJECT: Flying Cloud Airport Mn/DOT Environmental Review EAW97-028 Southwest Quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 212 & County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 1 Eden Prairie, Hennepin County C.S. 2744 The Metro Division of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Flying Cloud Airport Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for impacts to the state highway system. We apologize for the delay in responding to this submittal. We find the EAW acceptable with consideration of the following comments. • We strongly encourage the city to work with us to develop strategies for controlling direct access to TH 212. Access to an arterial such as TH 212 must be limited to a few well-spaced intersections with roads of arterial or collector classification. The local street network most safely accommodates local circulation and property access needs. An network is comp lementary to the adequate local street p ry regional highway system, and regional highways cannot substitute for it. When access points increase along a highway, accident and congestion problems are likely to follow. Control and reduction of access is critical in minimizing highway congestion and are important factors in reducing accidents on highways. It is increasingly important that we effectively manage the region's highway system. Safety and congestion problems are many, and solutions are more difficult and costly to implement after development occurs. In this, Mn/DOT would encourage the closure of at least one of the existing accesses to TH 212. One of the two northerly accesses should be able to be closed without adverse impact to the site. In addition, we also request that the future sites south of the Flying Cloud Airport bE designed with access to CSAH 4 as they develop, rather than with direct access to TH 212. We are available to discuss this issue further with the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the city, and other interested parties. An equal opportunity employer Mark Ryan January 5, 1998 page two • Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way will require an approved permit. The permit necessary will depend upon the nature of the work proposed. Questions regarding permits may be directed to Bill Warden of our Permits Unit at 582-1443. • We request the opportunity to review site plans and grading/drainage plans for any proposed developments next to TH 212, when plans have been prepared. Mn/DOT review of plans allows potential issues to be identified and considered at a comparatively early phase of the development process. Two copies of the plans may be sent to Sherry Narusiewicz, Local Government Liaison Supervisor, at the above address. Please allow thirty days for a formal response. This letter represents the transportation concerns of the Metro Division of Mn/DOT. Other environmental concerns raised by a wider Mn/DOT review may be forwarded to you under a separate letter. Please contact me at 582-1383 with any questions regarding this review. Sincerely, Lisa Christianson Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison c: Gerald Larson, Mn/DOT Environmental Coordinator Mike Louis, Mn/DOT Aeronautics Dave Zetterstrom, Hennepin County Public Works Mike Franzen, City of Eden Prairie o , Minnesota Dept ent of Transportation 1(0,1 Metropolitan Division 14"'op Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 December 6, 1996 • Scott Kipp, Senior Planner City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344-2230 Dear Scott Kipp: Subject: Charison Property . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review CPA96-046 North side of TH 169/212, East side of CR 4, West of Flying Cloud Airport Eden Prairie, Hennepin County CS 2744 • The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Charison Property Proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. We apologize for the delay in responding to this submittal. We find the proposed guide plan change acceptable with consideration of the following comments. • It is our understanding that a traffic impact analysis will need to be conducted before the guide plan may be changed. The city is already studying the traffic impacts of adding this area(and others) to the MUSA. If this area is also to be redesignated for a more traffic- intensive land use, the impacts of the land use change also should be examined. We request that the traffic impact analysis include existing, forecast, and proposed forecast traffic volumes, as well as directional distribution, and sight distance reviews at proposed access points. Without this data, it will be difficult to assess the guide plan change's effect on the highway system. Questions regarding our information needs may be directed to Mike Schadegg of our Traffic Engineering Section at 797-3126. • Because the property is adjacent to Trunk Highway (TH) 169/212, the preliminary plat must be submitted to us when it has been prepared. The plat should clearly identify the property boundary shared with the highway right-of-way. A more finalized site plan and grading/drainage plan must be submitted with the plat if they are available. Mn/DOT's plat review process allows us to identify any potential highway issues,,make recommendations to the city and the project proposer,and advise of any Mn/DOT permit requirements. Plats and other development plans may be directed to our new Local Government Liaison Supervisor, Sherry Narusiewicz, at the above address. An equal opportunity employer 3� Scott Kipp December 6, 1996 page two • Stormwater drainage patterns and rates of runoff affecting TH 169/212 right-of-way should be perpetuated. Questions regarding our drainage concerns may be directed to Brian Kelly of our Water Resources Section at 797-3055. If you have any questions about this review in general, please contact me at 582-1383. Sincerely, g4at A4414in Elizabeth Malaby Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison c: Brett & Tracy Hope Mark Filippi, Metropolitan Council -Transportation Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council - Transportation 391 j; . riennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer r . . James M. Bourcy, County Administrator • November 12, 1996 Mr. Chris Enger, Director Community Development Department City of Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Charlson Property - Guide Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Enger: We offer our comments on the above captioned matter as it pertains to our interest in the part of county highway 4 which is within the property. We are aware of, and agree with, the concept of realigning CSAH 4 as shown in the plan. By consolidating the two intersections of CSAH 1 and 4 the jog on CSAH 1 can be eliminated. We urge that consideration be given to providing sufficient right of way along CSAH 4 and to the specific realignment. Based on the City of Eden Prairie's preliminary projections of traffic, it is borderline as to whether a two-lane roadway will be adequate or whether a higher capacity road will be needed. Thus, we urge that a corridor of 90 to 100 feet be provided so that either a two-lane rural section or a four-lane urban section road can be constructed. Regarding alignment, to qualify for vital state aid funds the specific alignments will eventually need to be reviewed by our Design Section as well as by the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Office of State Aid. While the eastern most curve in CSAH 4 has been made more gentle in the proposed plan, it may well need to be made even more gentle in order to qualify for state aid. Department of Public Works 320 Washington Avenue South Recycled Paper Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8496 (612)930-2500 FAX:(612)930-2513 TDD:(612)930-2696 140 Mr. Chris Enger November 12, 1996 Page 2 As a point of information, we would like to note that budget matters will need to be addressed assuming development occurs. At present the county has not budgeted for any of the improvement contemplated in the Guide Plan Amendment. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Thomas D. Johnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:WKP:jh cc Jim Grube Bruce Polaczyk LI O C U.S. Department Airport District Office-Minneapolis of Transportation 6020-28th Avenue S,Rm 102 Federal Aviation Minneapolis,MN 55450-2706 Administration October 31, 1996 City of Eden Prairie Community Development Department 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Community Development Department : Charlson Property, Eden Prairie, Minnesota Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for the Charlson Property. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and FAA is currently preparing a Joint State and Federal environmental document for proposed expansion of the Flying Cloud Airport . The FAA is also reviewing the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) which depicts future development plans for the Airport . A cursory review of the Charlson Property "Illustrative Plan, " indicates it would conflict with proposed airport development . Land use and development controls based upon a well worked out compatible land use plan is among the most potent and affordable of the many airport compatibility strategies . This is particularly so in transitional developing areas such as the areas adjacent the Airport . The above mentioned environmental document will look at among other impacts, compatible land use. During the environmental process, including public scoping valuable inputs will be generated to assist the City in developing a sound Guild Plan that prevents the introduction of non-compatible land uses . We encourage its use in your development of the Guild Plan. Since the FAA and MAC have expended considerable effort and money supporting the airport and its proposed expansion, it would be prudent for the City to take preventative steps not uz 2 to allow non-compatible uses to be impacted by future development of the airport . Also, we support preserving an option for the MAC to purchase land for their expansion needs . We appreciate your concern for future development at the airport and your efforts in land use planning. Sincerely, Glen Orcutt Program Manager Memorandum To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Through: Bob Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources From: Stuart A. Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: April29, 1998 Subject: Supplemental StaffReport to the April 24, 1998 StaffReports by City Planner for the Proposed Guide Plan Change on the Standal Property, Brown Property, and Charlson Property BACKGROUND: The proposed Guide Plan changes for the Charlson property was reviewed at the December 15, 1997 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting. A copy of the staff report and minutes from that meeting are attached to this memo. Since that meeting,two additional properties have been added to the Guide Plan Booklet. The first is the David Brown property and the second is the Carol and John Standal property. These two properties add another 35.8 acres to the 440 acres that a Guide Plan change is being requested for. The Guide Plan Booklet outlines a number of different scenarios for road realignment, as well as the potential zoning or combination zoning for various areas. PARK DEVELOPMENT: The staff had identified a triangular a portion of the proposed Guide Plan could be used for a neighborhood park and be cross hatched to indicate residential and public space. This area has not been changed on the proposed Guide Plan schematic. This area is the only option outside the MAC property that provides suitable room for a neighborhood park to serve this area of the City. Staff has sent letters to the Metropolitan Airports Commission seeking clarification of several park issues,including acquisition and the suitability for public park and open space in areas that they may acquire. Those questions have not been fully answered. CREEK CORRIDORS: An area of the proposed Standal property abuts Riley Creek. Staff would recommend that the same creek corridor protection be designated on this portion of the Standal property as the rest of the plan shows. 44 ROAD CONNECTION: The road connection between existing Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road has two potential alignments. The value of this road connection should be carefully evaluated regarding the trade-off of the value of the environmental impact that it may represent. Careful study will needed in order to fully evaluate any proposed road connection from Spring Road to Eden Prairie Road on this southerly end. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed this proposed Guide Plan change at its April 20, 1998 meeting and approved it on a 7-0 vote. If the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission supports the information provided for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan as outlined, then approval should be based on the information included in the City Planner reports, the December 11, 1997 staff report to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, the December 15, 1997 approved minutes of the Parks,Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, and any recommendations that are added to this information at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission meeting. SAF:mdd 3Prop.memo/Stuart98 Lt5 PARKS,RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES May 6, 1998 Page 4 Stolar asked Wit was worth it to replace these trees to code requirements if there was a chance that many of them would not survive. Fox responded that these trees often become hollow because they are planted too close together but it was a judgement call regarding whether they will provide the screening level desired. Discussion ensued regarding the different types of trees that could be planted in the buffer strip. It was noted that all the trees between the homes and the subject property will be preserved. Hilgeman asked if Sofelt was willing to put in a few cottonwoods and Sofelt responded that their plan was developed by a landscape architect and staff recommendations but if the City required them to plant cottonwoods, they would consider it. MOTION: Stolar moved, seconded by Wilson,to recommend approval of the Fuller Road Business Center based on the details of the April 23, 1998 staff report by the City Planner and the additional information contained in the supplemental Staff Report dated April 28, 1998, with a preference for replacement trees similar to those presently existing on the site. Motion carried 6-0. Brown commented the Commission had required the proponent to meet the tree ordinance and he did not want to tell them what trees to plant where. Stolar commented that the plan was a diverse one, and he thanked the developer for presenting such a good plan. B. Charlson, Brown and Standal Properties Brett Hope introduced Tracy Hope and he gave an overview of the project. He described the proposed roadway configurations and the proposed guiding for each property. He noted there were park issues involving the remainder of the bluff creek corridor and a neighborhood park. These have been addressed within the plans. He offered an alternative to the location of the neighborhood park site in view of MAC acquiring land. He illustrated the alternative site theypropose and q g adjacentP P discussed the grades in the vicinity. Fox gave the staff report and noted the inclusion of Minutes from previous meetings. The City is still waiting to find out if the City can use any part of the"B" zone for a park. This plan is to allow the City to keep it's options open for the future. This is guiding only and will allow for greater flexibility for future development, but it is not something that is set permanently. He discussed the roadway connections and noted there is a good deal of controversy. No alignment design has been developed and staff recommended that a study be done to determine the best way to get the connection made between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road. He discussed the trail issues and reiterated that staff wants to keep as many options open as possible. MAC has to submit the Environmental Impact Statement within six months and this will have a large impact on this plan. Hilgeman stated the park site is only 8-9 acres in size and Fox responded it depends on how the adjacent land develops and what the uses are. Jacobson asked about the one mile radius requirement for neighborhood parks and Fox responded that there is a small park behind the Senior Center and staff has identified this area as the last neighborhood park vicinity. Discussion ensued regarding the airport expansion and the safety zone locations. Fox noted that this section of the supplemental staff report was carefully worded to reflect concern regarding the environmental impact of the proposed PARKS,RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES May 6, 1998 Page 5 Guide Plan Amendments and the roadway connections. Stolar stated he did not feel that the proposed roadway alignment was a good one and he did not have enough information to make a recommendation to the City Council on this issue. Fox stated there will be detailed plans for each site within this project as it occurs. There will be studies done regarding the roadway changes to determine the feasibility for the assessments and the impacts of the utilities that will need to be put in. Discussion ensued regarding what might be in a given area adjacent to the bluffs depending on what MAC does. MOTION: Wilson moved, seconded by Hilgeman to recommend approval of the Guide Plan Amendments based on the information included in the City Planner Reports, the December 11, 1997 staff report to the Parks, Recreation and natural Resources Commission, the December 15, 1997 approved Minutes of the Parks, Recreation and natural Resources Commission, and the Planning Commission staff report dated 4/20/98 with the option to have Eden Prairie Road connected to Highway 212 in some fashion. Motion carried 6-0. Fox stated staff will have the graphics changed prior to City Council review to make it easy for the Council to see what they were recommending. VI. OLD BUSINESS None. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Recommendation to name Staring Lake Park Playground Fox reviewed the staff report and stated that staff recommended approval of the name change. Hilgeman stated that Staring Lake was a historical site and asked if this change was being reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. She felt they should be involved in this process. Fox responded that it was just naming the playground, not changing the name of the park. Hilgeman stated the playground had been known to residents as the Staring Lake Playground and she did not see the reason to change the name of the playground. She felt it would only create confusion, and thought perhaps a commemorative plaque should be installed on the playground instead. Fox stated there are areas throughout the City where things have been given to the park system by individuals and there are plaques all over the community denoting these gifts. It still does not change the name of the particular park in which these gifts are placed. Discussion ensued regarding retaining the same name for a playground as the park in which it is located. MOTION: Wilson moved, seconded by Stolar,to recommend that the Staring Lake Park Playground be named the "Paul Redpath Playground". Motion tied 3-3. Commissioners Brown, Wilson, and Stolar voted"Aye"; Commissioners Koenig, Hilgeman, and Jacobson voted"No". Jacobson stated he voted no because he felt they would be establishing a precedent for naming all the other playgrounds if they named this one. Hilgeman stated it would only add to the confusion within L41 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.B. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger BROWN PROPERTY Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential and Office on 11.4 acres; 3. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations(and Council conditions). Background: This project is a change in land use to provide compatible land uses next to existing single family homes west of Eden Prairie Road and adjacent to the airport. The land use plan shows church and low density residential adjacent to Eden Prairie Road. Office is proposed adjacent to the airport. The March 1998 traffic study by Benshoof and Associates indicates that a total of 10,946 daily trips can be allocated to the Charlson, Standal and Brown properties without requiring road improvements outside of the properties. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses,the type and intensity of development related to traffic should be based on trips per acre. After subtracting out the church(450 daily trips),open space,and the airport the net 276.80 acres can share 10,496 daily trips(37.91 trips per acre). The Brown properties would be allocated 432 daily trips. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the April 27, 1998 meeting. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project at the May 5, 1998 meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change 2. Staff Report dated 4-24-98 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 4-27-98 4. Correspondence • BROWN PROPERTY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan("Plan"); and, WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Brown Property by David Brown for future residential and office uses requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: 11.4 acres from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential and Office located South of Pioneer Trail, east of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk 2- STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: April 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Brown Property Guide Plan Change APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: David Brown LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential, Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain, and Office on 11.4 acres. 1 ---c-- r : ''''ialnefilim' -: irr2; 1 :_,3 ,( ,. •Mi c NOS 5•( tar •,, ,ty--A.,.....N. 51 .0;13 -C, ‘ 1 — I ------ ) ' 71 ... - f 1 — IIIII k NW. •, 4r4Letz4i; . Of ity•T \•(---' ,1'...a -Th .1. -------) ,4, r MAJOR Iln ,V i '.! AO 4.• .,___,,ZI ... ) I / : A.4 -i 14/1 I /•- v I ti VALLI id(11 I , NN I/ . .( . I / .-/- ii • ' 1 .. .. ---'-__-- AL t- ---- -- T. ...........,,,,N.........,.....N.,,,....._ i c\As - .- I 1 ' ---._,....._.....„.......„._.,,•-•=r:,,,,,,,, 7.4,, : .' ? 6 . 1-----.. ____ I i Fiy . NG 'lc' ——- — —— I p il--- ft ,..- A tRPoRT .... "ki , . I I ' • \ rLT , N I I cLo ,. o __________ s i I AkiCP OR I' / TRACT 0 etRAOW/I‘j 1 I - 1 .ftrE,crf , 1 1 :4"fer. 5 1 i . • • 1 i TRACT 0 i - ..4.---'-------- --( iia . ,...,11•0 ,...,, TRACT C I -____----------\j-m n.r myin VICrc 00-----7---------------- °AMC I' ) I ---------tr.a•-„........ ,• • ::.:.:1•:::... .• \------ ': .• . • . i k I I 6 * A S S ::.,. ... i . •..' ::''.,'.':.•.: ' . •: : , I ..• •:. . 7/- I '. \ I . _..--_,....N.........N...___) . 7/ 1 ) \ i --------N, Staff Report Brown Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 DEVELOPMENT REQUEST The property is currently guided Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The owner is proposing a land use change to a mixture of Medium Density Residential, Office, and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The office designation would be a minimum of 75% office. This would allow research and development, and office showroom buildings, and would preclude bulk industrial. PLANNING ISSUES • What are the significant natural resources on the site? How does the plan preserve them? The site is relatively level with a small amount of scattered tree cover. The site is suitable for the requested uses and is compatible with proposed uses on the Standal and Charlson properties. • What are the housing goals for the City? How do the proposed plan help meet housing goals? General city housing goals are to provide a variety of housing and lifestyle choices. There is a need for senior one level walkout housing. The proposed plan for low density and multiple family residential will allow for a variety of housing types and styles to be built. Affordable attached housing can be built in the proposed multiple family areas. • What is the capacity of roads in the area? Is the proposed plan consistent with road capacity? If not,what road improvements are required? The March 1998 traffic study by Benshoof and Associates indicates that a total of 10,946 daily trips daily trips can be allocated to the Charlson, Standal and Brown property without requiring road improvements outside of the properties. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses,the type and intensity of development related to traffic should be based on trips per acre. After subtracting out the church(450 daily trips),open space,and the airport the net 276.80 acres can share 10,496 daily trips(37.91 trips per acre). The Brown property would be allocated 432 daily trips. • Are proposed road alignments consistent with the City's transportation plan? The proposed road alignments shown on the plan are in some ways consistent with 2 Staff Report Brown Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 the City's transportation plan and in other ways not consistent. The plan shows the southerly end of Eden Prairie Road disconnected from TH 212 and connected to CSAH 4 north of TH212. While not shown on the transportation plan, there are some positive aspects to this change. The intersection would be eliminated along TH212 which should improve the safety of this corridor. The probability that Eden Prairie Road would be used as an alternative to CSAH 4 for trips between CSAH 1 and TH212 would be significantly reduced. This is an appropriate change considering the land use adjacent to Eden Prairie Road is residential. The Charlson plan also proposes a realignment of CSAH 4 through the properties to intersect with TH212 near Flying Cloud Airport. This would result in the southerly segment of existing Spring Road becoming a city street. The proposed new road alignment through the Charlson property to serve its development is appropriate. Switching the designation of CSAH 4 from Spring Road to this new road alignment is probably not appropriate considering the functional classification for CSAH 4 and travel patterns between TH212 and CSAH 1. The realignment of the intersection of CSAH 4 with CSAH 1 from its current location and a common intersection with Mitchell Road westerly to a common intersection with the north leg of CSAH 4 is consistent with the City's transportation plan and a desirable change. This provides for better continuity along CSAH 4 which is classified as an arterial roadway. This will reduce the likelihood that arterial level traffic is transferred to Mitchell Road which is a local collector. • Will the sanitary sewer and water main facility plan for the Brown property serve other properties? A system of liftstations and force main will be necessary to provide sewer service in this area. The main elements of both the sanitary sewer and water distribution systems will follow existing corridors like Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. Ultimately, existing neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road will receive service from the same system's that serve the Brown property. Historically, the city has considered extending sewer and water service into neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road when there is a request for service from a significant number of existing property owners in the neighborhood. Current City policy provides for the assessment of street improvement cost in the year the project is constructed,but delays the assessment for lateral sanitary sewer and water improvements for up to five years or until a property is connected. This reduces the initial impact of assessments to those properties with serviceable wells and septic systems. The placement of sanitary sewer and water in Eden Prairie Road to service the Charlson property would not result in immediate assessments to a neighborhood like Valley or Hilltop Road. It will, however, provide the opportunity for the neighborhood to consider the local improvements as an alternative to reconstructing a Staff Report Brown Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 wells and septic systems. • Are there cultural resources in the area ? There are historic buildings, structures, landscapes, and archaeology sites within or contiguous to the property. Cultural resources on the site will be reviewed in more detail by the Historic Preservation Commission. • Raquet Farmstead, 9380 Spring Road Site: HE-EPC-025 • Fredrick-Miller Spring, Spring Road(County Road 4) Site: HE-EPC-088 • Charlson Site, City owned property(55 acres) Site: HE-EPC -90 • Palmer Mounds, east end of the property Site:HE-EPC-A09 • Historic Landscape, Eden Prairie Road Site HE-EPC-079 • Archaeology Sites, 21-HE-0284 • Is there a need for a City park in the area? Does the plan provide an area for a future park? The Comprehensive Park Plan identifies a need for a 15-20 acre park in the area. Originally the Park and Recreation staff believed the most likely scenario was to locate a park on land acquired by MAC for the protection of the B Zone west of the airport. However MAC has recently indicated that a City park would not be acceptable. This means that land dedication or a combination of land dedication and cash park fees will be required. The park and recreation needs will be discussed at the Parks and Recreation Commission. • What impact will the airport have on the proposed plan? Land acquisition and airport noise zones will have an impact on the proposed plan. In January of 1996,the MAC approved a plan to acquire 280 acres. This covered all of Safety Zones A and B for the expanded airport and a hangar area south of the airport. If the airport expands as proposed, 194 acres of the Charlson property will be acquired by MAC. In August of 1997, the MAC held a public hearing to acquire the first 120 acres of this area. It includes all of the Safety Zone A and B for the existing airport, and Safety Zone A for the expanded airport,out to Eden Prairie Road. No further action has taken place to acquire the south side hangar area. If the airport does not expand, MAC still intends on acquiring property for the existing Runway Protection Zone and Safety Zone A out to Eden Prairie Road. Airport noise will be a factor in the development of the property. Any development 4 Staff Report Brown Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 will need to be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. Noise zones C and D overlay the property. For new development,single- family and multi-family with individual entrances are considered inconsistent within zone C, and conditional within zone D. Approximately half of the site shown for Church use is under zone C. Conditional uses require approval of the Met Council. The Long Term Comprehensive Plan for the airport was approved by the Met Council in 1996. In October of this year, the MAC began the EIS process. Completion of the EIS is tentatively scheduled for the spring of 1999. Construction could begin in 2000. The airport expansion proposal includes: • Extending the northerly east/west runway from 3,600 feet to 3,900 feet. • Extending the southerly east/west runway from 3,900 feet to 5,000 feet. • An additional south side hangar area. • Acquiring the acreage necessary to accommodate the proposal (MAC indicates 282 acres) In 1988 the City adopted Resolution 88-299 finding MAC's Long Term Comprehensive Plan alternative to extend the southerly east/west runway to 5,000 feet incompatible with Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Guide Plan. In 1992 the City adopted Resolution 92-124 which opposes the extension of runway 9R-27L When the Met Council approved the MUSA shift,it withheld approximately 30 acres. The 20 acres within the Charlson property is proposed for a mix of Office,Industrial, Medium Density Residential and Open Space use. This area is also part of the MAC acquisition area. This area cannot develop until the MAC acquires all necessary land for the expanded airport configuration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission believes there are compelling reasons for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan then one option would be to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential,Office,and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain from based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Office shall mean a minimum of 75% office use. This would allow for research and development or office showroom buildings similar to Southwest Crossing, or Edenvale Executive Park(interim City Hall)where buildings are one story brick and glass buildings. 5 Staff Report Brown Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 The intent is to create a City West development. 2. Planned Unit Developments,Rezoning, Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plats shall meet City Code Requirements. 3. Traffic generation shall not exceed 432 daily trips. lz 9 Memorandum To: Mike Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Senior Planner From: Stuart A..Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: May 5, 1998 Subject: Summary of the May 5, 1998 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting The following projects were reviewed at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on May 5, 1998. The cotes and comments are as follows: • Fuller Road Business Center The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The plan was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission commented that they prefer to replace the cottonwood trees with some like trees. • Charlson, Brown and Standal Properties The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The proposed development was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The information contained in the supplemental staff report includes the specific information regarding three park issues as follows: 1. To have public/open space designation cross hatched on the salmon colored area of the proposed Guide Plan change. This was recommended earlier and was not shown on this proposed submission. 2. The area adjacent to the Standal property should be designated as public open space 150 feet from the center line of the Riley Creek. - 3. Road Connection: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the wording that was included in the supplemental staff report. In addition, they felt that an option three should also be considered when the transportation study is done for connecting Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. This option would be a right in, right out connection from Eden Prairie Road to 212. SAF:mdd Franzen.memo/Stuar,8 10 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 4 B. CHARLSON PROPERTY by Lynn Charlson. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, medium Density Residential, and Office on 440 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. C. BROWN PROPERTY by David Brown. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan changes from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and office on 11.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. D. STANDAL PROPERTY by Carol and John Standal. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential, and office on 24.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail,west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. Franzen stated staff has requested the Planning Commission to review Items B,C,and D together as they comprise one project. He noted the proponents had requested separate review in case on portion of the project should be denied. John Uban representing all three proponents, reviewed the project's history and described the final plan they have submitted for approval. The land is located to the south and west of Flying Cloud Airport. He discussed the existing roads and the new roadway system they are proposing. They are also proposing to connect Eden Prairie Road with Spring Lake Road and close the access onto Highway 212, which would direct the major portions of the traffic onto the new roadway which will gain access farther to the east. This roadway will also serve the airport expansion areas as well. He discussed the Guide Plan Amendments they are proposing which he hoped would be approved. The airport will be acquiring portions of this property for their expansion, and he indicated these areas on the plans. He noted they are actively pursuing acquisition at this time but no formal offers have been tendered. He discussed the proposed uses that will be in which areas of the site. They are proposing office/commercial uses adjacent to the airport. He showed a plan which would be the land use designations they believe are the most appropriate and most likely to happen. He stated they have been working with adjacent landowners to develop the best plan possible for this area which will give some flexibility and be the best way to develop this area. Clinton asked about the relocation of Spring Road and what it would be and Uban responded the road from Pioneer Trail to Highway 212 is a larger roadway to handle more of the traffic which will preserve the existing Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road as much as possible. Clinton asked about the connection between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road and if this issue had been resolved. Uban responded they have PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 5 two ways to make this connection and it has not yet been studied by the City to determine which way will be the best way to do this. Foote asked what type of industrial uses would be adjacent to the airport and Uban responded it will probably be corporate headquarters or office buildings on 40-plus care sites. It would not be heavy industrial uses. Dom asked what the airport would do with the land and Uban responded that they need it to have a safety zone and install some lights. There would not be a major change in the terrain from modifications they would make. The area south of the airport will be used for corporate hangars and a ponding area will also be included in this portion of the site. This level will be on the same level as the present airport, and the remaining land between this point and Highway 212 will terrace down to the lower elevation. Dorn asked about where the single family housing would be located on the western portion of the site and Uban reviewed the site plan and described the landscaping in this area. Dorn asked if the airport was agreeable to the proposed alignment of the roadway through their property from the church to the south and Uban responded that they have not yet purchased this land but they have been working with them to be sure they participate in the design of this system to facilitate good planning for the City. Discussion ensued regarding the roadway elevations adjacent to the airport and the amount of clearance required for aircraft at the end of the runway. Franzen noted there were two alternatives for roadway alignments. A decision can't be made at a concept level of planning. Final road locations are done at the Rezoning stage when more detailed information is available. Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of all three projects. The density will be limited to the roadway capacity. The Public Hearing was opened. Eileen Benz,9775 Spring Road,stated her home is sandwiched between both projects and she is opposed to both. She was concerned about the roadway configurations, noise levels, lighting and other impacts from the development. She was concerned about the light industrial uses and exactly what that would be. She noted that there was concern for the impact of these uses on the new properties that were being developed, and asked that the Planning Commission give the same concern to the existing properties as the project developed. Gray described the traffic levels they anticipate on the new roadways and noted they anticipate very little change from what is there now. It is possible that they could have the primary point of ingress/egress from Highway 212. There will be an increase of traffic on Spring road because it is a County Road and it is part of the transportation system in the region. Staff anticipates that Spring Road will remain a two lane road although a significant one. It will probably stay that way for the next twenty years. Sandstad asked about the connection with Highway 212 and if they would have a stop /� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 6 sign or signal there because that intersection is located on a hill. Gray responded that they would like to have a signal and this could result in some work being done on Highway 212 to level out that hill. He described the elevations in the area and the relationship between the new runway and the new roadway. Gray discussed the proposed connection between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road and the reasons why this should be done. They would be improving major access spacing and preserving the character of Eden Prairie Road. By making this connection it will eliminate Eden Prairie Road as a through road. There are also some opportunities to work with MAC to improve the number of access points by perhaps creating a frontage road along the airport. Hibbert Hill, 10131 Eden Prairie Road,was concerned about sewer and water coming in and if he would be assessed. Gray stated it would be coming in but he could not say what the assessment would be for his property because there were many variables included in the assessment formula. Hill was concerned about having people from the industrial area access Spring Road and Gray responded that it was a County road and from a safety standpoint it was best to have more than one connection for this new roadway. Staff anticipates that most of the traffic will use the new road and not Spring Road. Hill asked about the water rationing and commented that now they are extending the areas of service and whether that was a conflict. Gray stated the City is bringing the new water plant on line but water restrictions will be used to control peak demand times to assure an adequate water supply. Eden Prairie has a more than adequate water supply for the community. Hill inquired if he would be able to opt out of the sewer and water expansion and Gray responded that the Metropolitan Council's philosophy was that all communities should move toward the expansion of utilities. Hill stated he had not been consulted by the developers of the project and they stated they had met with the neighbors. He felt that their rights were being ignored by the proponents of the development. Gray stated this project was still at the concept level and not a finely detailed plan which means that they look at what most residents would want in the way of transportation systems. There is flexibility to determine details as the plan is developed in the future. Franzen stated that Staff held a neighborhood meeting at the Planning Commission meeting last December and the plan was not satisfactory which is why they came back to the Planning Commission with this proposal. Habicht asked what Hill thought of this plan aside from the roadway issues and Hill responded that as long as they were aware they were giving up the last part of natural land in Eden Prairie, it was a good plan. Jim Van Winkle, 10129 Eden Prairie Road,stated he did not understand how the City could make the connection from Eden Prairie Road across private land to Spring Road. He felt it was absolutely foolish to put housing at the end of a runway especially multiple family housing,because of all the difficulties they were having in Richfield with the MSP airport. Bert Noterman, owner of The Lion's Tap Restaurant, stated he also owned ten acres north of that site. He planned to have residential housing on this land. He was PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 7 adjacent to this development site and was not contacted regarding this project. He wanted to be sure that his property was protected. He was concerned about roadway access to his property so he could develop it later on without having to damage the trees. Regarding the issue of airport expansion, he was aware that it was going to happen. He was concerned if it would create a greater hazard by closing the access onto Eden Prairie Road than if it were left open. He was concerned about access to his business and how the road reconfiguration would impact that. Dennis Davie, 9900 Spring Road, stated he felt the proponents had done a good job in planning the project but there were some things that were confusing. The roadway configuration changes were the most confusing. He discussed traffic flow patterns in the area now and stated he was concerned about the added traffic from the new development being added to it. Gray stated while there is some cut-through traffic onto Eden Prairie Road today, the majority of trips stay on Spring Road. These are details that will be worked out with the final plans. The grades will have an impact on the roadway configuration. He discussed the Highway 212 intersection with Spring Road and explained why it was a better connection than Eden Prairie Road would be. David stated he had abundant wildlife in his yard,and felt that single family homes along Eden Prairie Road should be supported. He did not agree with the medium density housing area that was being proposed. He had to get a variance to have his home and he felt the density proposed was too great a volume for this area of Eden Prairie. He was also concerned about the designated office/industrial use being proposed. Franzen stated the proposed land use designation would require the buildings be 75% office and 25%industrial,or it would be possible to have a multi-story office building on that site. He reviewed the standards for this zoning district and noted that staff wanted to preserve as many natural features as possible. John Standal stated he was one of the proponents of the development and he and his wife had a tree farm on this property for the last twenty years. They now feel it is time for a change in their lifestyle and they want to reduce their workload. He requested the Planing Commission to approve the project. Gene Gray, 9040 Sunrise Circle, stated he was opposed to the project and felt Eden Prairie did not need another industrial park or more housing. He urged the Planning Commission to deny the project and requested the City to purchase the land and dedicate it to the Audubon Society. Habicht asked if he would support this measure as a taxpayer, and Gray responded he would if the price was right. Gray stated the owners of the property were the proponents of this development but the City has also had some plans regarding how they believed this area should be developed. MAC has stipulated to the City that the land adjacent to the airport should not be residential in character. Sandstad commented he thought it was a very nice property and it would be nice to have a large budget and be able to purchase the land as suggested by Mr. Gray. However, it would be difficult to come up with the $2 Million plus in funding it would take to purchase these properties, and it was not lL/ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 8 practical to deny the project on that basis. Lloyd Walin, 9978 Windsor Terrace, commented that if the property which is proposed to be developed as industrial would have traffic coming from the south it might also have traffic coming from the north as well. It was his understanding that the City Council had taken a position that the airport expansion should not take place. Foote commented that the City has opposed the expansion but the City does not have any say in it if MAC comes up with the funding to purchase the land. Sandstad stated this plan works both ways and the Planning Commission has supported the City Council position regarding the airport expansion issue. Vicky Small, 1655 Beverly Drive, stated MAC has a history of not holding up it's agreements with the City and she wanted to know if there were any legal documents that would hold them to this. Gray responded that historically the realignment of Spring Road has been part of the City's transportation plan for twenty years. In this plan it is a critical element and we need to have further discussion as to how this will be implemented. This realignment could be a 1999 project as well as the new roadway and the connection to Highway 212. This should be made a condition of approval for the developer. This would be included in the Developer's Agreement if the plan should be approved then MAC would have to honor these things if they acquire the land before the project is completed. Severin Peterson, 15900 Flying Cloud Drive, stated he lives at the northeast corner of Highway 212 and Spring Road. He has not seen the plan before tonight and his interest is in compatibility with the proposed development. He could relate to some of the concerns voiced by the neighbors and his family has a lot of history in the area. Things have changed in Eden Prairie and it will continue to change. He requested a meeting with the proponents to share his concerns. He was concerned about the impacts of the roadway changes, and safety issues were also of great importance. Loren Wattke, 16860 Flying Cloud Drive, stated he no longer uses the Eden Prairie Road access onto Highway 212 because it is too dangerous and he was glad it was going to be closed off. He has received the impression that the City has given up regarding the issue of the airport expansion and since all of southern Eden Prairie was going to be impacted by MAC,he felt it should not be taken lightly. If the airport is expanded there will be some large planes coming into Eden Prairie and he asked the City again to oppose the expansion. Alexander stated she thought the plan was good for the area but was sad to see the open area go. The homes that were going to be built in this area will be impacted by Flying Cloud airport and even if it does not expand there will be noise impacts from it on these homes. She was not sure that the plan should go ahead now or if it needed to have more refinement. Sandstad stated it was a very large project but it was a concept plan. He was opposed to the airport expansion. He supported the proposal and was comfortable with the project as proposed. Habicht concurred and noted that some of the more intense uses I!S PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April27, 1998 Page 9 on the south side were dependent on the new roadway which he wanted to know if the roadway was going to be built. Gray responded that the project should be approved with the stipulation that the roadway be there to support this type of land use. The proponents wil have to work with MnDOT to get this done prior to proceeding with the development. Franzen stated the Developers Agreement will identify the land uses, types of uses, and the roadways that will have to be built prior to implementation of the project. Habicht responded he was comfortable with the changes to the Guide Plan with this type of provision included in the Developers Agreement. Lewis stated she was comfortable with the mix of uses in concept. In this area with the proximity to the airport industrial is the best use of that land. The City will have final review and approval of what will go there. The Eden Prairie Road/Highway 212 intersection was very hazardous and she was in favor of closing it. Clinton stated he was not 100%in favor of the airport expansion and he was well aware of the noise that emanates from the airport. There will not be a significant change in the size of the planes that use the airport regardless of whether it expands or not. A concept plan is not always what is built on a given site. He supported the concept plan as proposed. Dorn stated he supported the concept plan,particularly the access location change onto Highway 212. Foote stated he agreed with the other Commissioners and supported the Concept Plan. Specific details will be worked out as each phase of the project moves forward. He was opposed to the airport expansion and he has concerns about MAC wanting to expand the airport even further in the future. Franzen stated that staff would have a definition for office and multi-family residential use prior to City Council review of the project, so they will know what is expected. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Sandstad moved,seconded by Clinton,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Lynn Charlson for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Office on 440 acres based on Plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Dorn, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of David Brown for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and office on 11.4 acres based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. Iw PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 10 MOTION: Habicht moved, seconded by Alexander, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Carol and John Standal for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Office on 24.4 acres based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. P.11111111111111111110AVIDIBROWNRisiiimiiiiiiii ` i ::: . . ..... .98O i S 0n load.0:«< :::>>:>< ':m >: January 13, 1998 Eden Prairie City Council and Planning Commission 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie,MN 55344-2230 Re: Brown Property Comprehensive Land Use Amendment Dear City Council and Planning Commission Members: I am requesting that my 11.4 acre property, located in southwest Eden Prairie close to the Flying Cloud Airport expansion area, be considered for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. I have been working closely with Brett Hope and the Charlson Property Comprehensive Plan proposal presently before you, and feel this is an appropriate time to consider how my property can join in the planning of the south Flying Cloud Airport area. I believe this will provide additional opportunities and better coordination with future Charlson development. My property is situated at the northerly portion of the City's Bluff Park and surrounded by sloping land owned by Lynn Charlson to the southeast and John Standall to the west. Overall coordination of land uses will provide a better opportunity for creative development in the future. I am proposing to include my property in flexible land use guiding in concert with potential development around an expanded airport. Both residential and office uses would be appropriate on my parcel when developed in a coordinated fashion with the Charlson property. The Charlson property guide plan proposes a residential buffer to the Brown property. The topography of the land is such that coordinated development in this area may eliminate the need for buffering while still protecting the development potential for the Standall property to the west. Since my property is the flat crown of the hill, access would be gained through the Charlson property. In the long run, we feel area development would benefit from a guide plan change that would allow the flexibility to accommodate the highest and best use for the area. At this present time, our understanding is that John Standall is contemplating a low or medium density development which can eventually be coordinated with development from the Brown and Charlson property. This flexible land use guiding will allow for the appropriate land use transitions and buffers to take place producing a beneficial land use pattern. f� Eden Prairie City Council and Planning Commission Page 2 We believe that our application for a relatively small parcel(11.4 acres) can be considered with the same background information supplied in the Charlson property submittal. All of that • information is current and pertains to the Brown property with the same general impacts and considerations. The Brown property abuts the City parkland as does the Charlson property and the property itself does not contain any cultural or historical features. The proposed land use guiding has been looked at in view of potential traffic generation which has been shown on a separate traffic calculation and land use map that includes the Charlson property to determine accumulative effects on potential traffic. The traffic numbers generated from this site project the maximum potential development where, in fact, a lesser amount may be the actual condition. Those calculations are included. We understand that City staff will look at the traffic and combination of the Charlson and Brown property land use designations and continue with the hearing process that began in December of 1997. We have also met with John Standall and are keeping him informed of our planning process. We understand that he wishes to make a separate application to the City at some future time. Should the City require additional information on my property, I would be happy to forward more data as may be required. Thank you for considering my application and I hope it can be reviewed in a timely fashion without subjecting the Charlson proposal to any delay in the review process. Sincerely, David Brown l9 EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V.C. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger STANDAL PROPERTY Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential and Office on 24.4 acres; 3. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations(and Council conditions). Background: This project is a change in land use to provide compatible land uses next to existing single family homes west of Eden Prairie Road and adjacent to the airport. The land use plan shows church and low density residential adjacent to Eden Prairie Road. Office is proposed adjacent to the airport. The March 1998 traffic study by Benshoof and Associates indicates that a total of 10,946 daily trips can be allocated to the Charlson, Standal and Brown properties without requiring road improvements outside of the properties. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses,the type and intensity of development related to traffic should be based on trips per acre. After subtracting the church(450 daily trips),open space,and the airport the net 276.8 acres can share 10,496 daily trips or 37.91 trips per acre. The Standal property would be allocated 925 daily trips. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the April 27, 1998 meeting. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 6-0 to approve the project at the May 5, 1998 meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change 2. Staff Report dated 4-24-98 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 4-27-98 4. Correspondence • STANDAL PROPERTY CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan("Plan"); and, WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of Standal Property by Carol and John Standal for future residential and office uses requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: 24.4 acres from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential and Office located South of Pioneer Trail, east of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: April 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Standal Property Guide Plan Change • APPLICANT/ FEE OWNER: Carol and John Standal LOCATION: South of Pioneer Trail, West of Eden Prairie Road REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential, Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain, and Office on 24.4 acres. 1 3 -r;Lill 1 0-- _ =1 _ {^k�jy' "� - kr� _���`_ „� j•�.:Eli �,Iyr llc 1! i �� �i a�:�-�� j � � 1 _. _ F., �I ,iD:- ,I , a _J Yr 1--T �, .,ram ' ' I I S� ` \. ° aL? \\\ 1 i I) iii I or • . //I -- '-'N..,::\N.-.• ••\\\N ---.----N) cl 4. - - r0 r// .. " -- s. --.....''''''.------,.. , ....,„pe . I-4 ,0 I i I F L T 1 N G C L O U O +-uI = I 4 1i0i T L 1 7 _ 1 . v o 0 R T • •• TRACT D rm DA t, I • o'� I ,Korozrie :.;........: , , : +. , ,..______ r". rnur e R.Lr '1/TRACr C — ___________„:4.., TLT . '•. 1 I ns.u: DRIVEillvf. Y, -- .D. �_ R,vei I I _ A k 1\---- I' \ . ' • I 6 A A S S • • c ere 1 / Staff Report Standl Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 BACKGROUND This 24.4 acre site is adjacent to Riley Creek and the City property to the south. DEVELOPMENT REQUEST The property is currently guided Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The owner is proposing a land use change to a mixture of Medium Density Residential, Office, and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain. The office designation would be a minimum of 75%office. This would allow research and development, and office showroom buildings, and would preclude bulk industrial. PLANNING ISSUES • What are the significant natural resources on the site? How does the plan preserve them? Riley Creek,Minnesota River Bluff, and wooded areas are the significant natural resources. The plan shows the land along Riley Creek and the Minnesota River Bluff as permanent open space. The City's shoreland ordinance requires a 100 foot structure setback and a"do not disturb" 50 foot shore impact zone for single family and a 150 foot structure setback and 75 foot shore impact zone for multiple family. No grading or tree removal is permitted by City code in the shore impact zone. Multiple family and office are compatible uses. Multistory buildings can be clustered and terraced at the top of the slopes to protect vegetation adjacent to Riley Creek. • What are the housing goals for the City? How does the proposed plan help meet the housing goals? General city housing goals are to provide a variety of housing and lifestyle choices. There is a need for senior one level walkout housing. The proposed plan for multiple family residential will allow for a variety of housing types and styles to be built. Cluster, one level walkout housing is appropriate on wooded and sloped sites. Units can be clustered to maximize the amount of preserved open space. Affordable attached housing can be built in the proposed multiple family areas. 2 5 Staff Report Standl Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 • What is the capacity of roads in the area? Is the proposed plan consistent with road capacity? If not, what road improvements are required? The March 1998 traffic study by Benshoof and Associates indicates that a total of 10,946 daily trips can be allocated to the Charison, Standl and Brown property without requiring road improvements outside of the properties. Since the proposed land use plan is a mixture of land uses,the type and intensity of development related to traffic should be based on trips per acre. After subtracting the church (450 daily trips), open space, and the airport the net 276.8 acres can share 10,496 daily trips or 37.91 trips per acre. The Standl property would be allocated 925 daily trips. • Are proposed road alignments consistent with the City's transportation plan? The proposed road alignments shown on the plan are in some ways consistent with the City's transportation plan and in other ways not consistent. The plan shows the southerly end of Eden Prairie Road disconnected from TH 212 and connected to CSAH 4 north of TH212. While not shown on the transportation plan, there are some positive aspects to this change. The intersection would be eliminated along TH212 which should improve the safety of this corridor. The probability that Eden Prairie Road would be used as an alternative to CSAH 4 for trips between CSAH 1 and TH212 would be significantly reduced. This is an appropriate change considering the land use adjacent to Eden Prairie Road is residential. The plan also proposes a realignment of CSAH 4 through the properties to intersect with TH212 near Flying Cloud Airport. This would result in the southerly segment of existing Spring Road becoming a city street. The proposed new road alignment through the properties to serve its development is appropriate. Switching the designation of CSAH 4 from Spring Road to this new road alignment is probably not appropriate considering the functional classification for CSAH 4 and travel patterns between TH212 and CSAH 1. The realignment of the intersection of CSAH 4 with CSAH 1 from its current location and a common intersection with Mitchell Road westerly to a common intersection with the north leg of CSAH 4 is consistent with the City's transportation plan and a desirable change. This provides for better continuity along CSAH 4 which is classified as an arterial roadway. This will reduce the likelihood that arterial level traffic is transferred to Mitchell Road which is a local collector. • Will the sanitary sewer and water main facility plan for the Standl property serve other properties? A system of liftstations and force main will be necessary to provide sewer service in (0 Staff Report Standl Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 this area. The main elements of both the sanitary sewer and water distribution systems will follow existing corridors like Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. Ultimately, existing neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road will receive service from the same system's that serve the properties. Historically, the city has considered extending sewer and water service into neighborhoods like Valley Road and Hilltop Road when there is a request for service from a significant number of existing property owners in the neighborhood. Current City policy provides for the assessment of street improvement cost in the year the project is constructed,but delays the assessment for lateral sanitary sewer and water improvements for up to five years or until a property is connected. This reduces the initial impact of assessments to those properties with serviceable wells and septic systems. The placement of sanitary sewer and water in Eden Prairie Road to service the properties would not result in immediate assessments to a neighborhood like Valley or Hilltop Road. It will, however, provide the opportunity for the neighborhood to consider the local improvements as an alternative to reconstructing wells and septic systems. • Are there cultural resources in the area ? There are historic buildings, structures, landscapes, and archaeology sites within or contiguous to the property. Cultural resources on the site will be reviewed in more detail by the Historic Preservation Commission. • Raquet Farmstead, 9380 Spring Road Site: HE-EPC-025 • Fredrick-Miller Spring, Spring Road(County Road 4) Site: HE-EPC-088 • Charlson Site, City owned property(55 acres) Site: HE-EPC -90 • Palmer Mounds, east end of the property Site:HE-EPC-A09 • Historic Landscape,Eden Prairie Road Site HE-EPC-079 • Archaeology Sites, 21-HE-0284 • Is there a need for a City park in the area? Does the plan provide an area for a future park? The Comprehensive Park Plan identifies a need for a 15-20 acre park in the area. Originally the Park and Recreation staff believed the most likely scenario was to locate a park on land acquired by MAC for the protection of the B Zone west of the airport. However MAC has recently indicated that a City park would not be acceptable. This means that land dedication or a combination of land dedication and cash park fees will be required. The park and recreation needs will be discussed at the Parks and Recreation Commission. • What impact will the airport have on the proposed plan? 4 Staff Report Standl Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 Land acquisition and airport noise zones will have an impact on the proposed plan. In January of 1996,the MAC approved a plan to acquire 280 acres. This covered all of Safety Zones A and B for the expanded airport and a hangar area south of the airport. If the airport expands as proposed, 194 acres of the Charlson property will be acquired by MAC. In August of 1997,the MAC held a public hearing to acquire the first 120 acres of this area. It includes all of the Safety Zone A and B for the existing airport, and Safety Zone A for the expanded airport,out to Eden Prairie Road. No further action has taken place to acquire the south side hangar area. If the airport does not expand, MAC still intends on acquiring property for the existing Runway Protection Zone and Safety Zone A out to Eden Prairie Road. Airport noise will be a factor in the development of the property. Any development will need to be consistent with the Metropolitan Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. Noise zones C and D overlay the property. For new development,single- family and multi-family with individual entrances are considered inconsistent within zone C, and conditional within zone D. Approximately half of the site shown for Church use is under zone C. Conditional uses require approval of the Met Council. The Long Term Comprehensive Plan for the airport was approved by the Met Council in 1996. In October of this year, the MAC began the EIS process. Completion of the EIS is tentatively scheduled for the spring of 1999. Construction could begin in 2000. The airport expansion proposal includes: • Extending the northerly east/west runway from 3,600 feet to 3,900 feet. • Extending the southerly east/west runway from 3,900 feet to 5,000 feet. • An additional south side hangar area. • Acquiring the acreage necessary to accommodate the proposal (MAC indicates 282 acres) In 1988 the City adopted Resolution 88-299 finding MAC's Long Term Comprehensive Plan alternative to extend the southerly east/west runway to 5,000 feet incompatible with Eden Prairie's Comprehensive Guide Plan. In 1992 the City adopted Resolution 92-124 which opposes the extension of runway 9R-27L When the Met Council approved the MUSA shift,it withheld approximately 30 acres. The 20 acres within the Charlson property is proposed for a mix of Office,Industrial, 5 Staff Report Standl Guide Plan Change April 24, 1998 Medium Density Residential and Open Space use. This area is also part of the MAC acquisition area. This area cannot develop until the MAC acquires all necessary land for the expanded airport configuration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission believes there are compelling reasons for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan then one option would be to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Medium Density Residential,Office,and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Office shall mean a 75%minimum office use. This would allow for research and development or office showroom buildings similar to Southwest Crossing, or Edenvale Executive Park (interim City Hall)where buildings are one story brick and glass buildings. The intent is to create a City West development. 2. Planned Unit Developments,Rezoning, Site Plan Review and Preliminary Plats shall meet City Code Requirements. 3. Traffic generation shall not exceed 925 daily trips. 6 9 Memorandum To: Mike Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Senior Planner From: Stuart A..Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: May 5, 1998 Subject: Summary of the May 5, 1998 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting The following projects were reviewed at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on May 5, 1998. The Notes and comments are as follows: • Fuller Road Business Center The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The plan was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission commented that they prefer to replace the cottonwood trees with some like trees. • Charlson, Brown and Standal Properties The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The proposed development was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The information contained in the supplemental staff report includes the specific information regarding three park issues as follows: 1. To have public/open space designation cross hatched on the salmon colored area of the proposed Guide Plan change. This was recommended earlier and was not shown on this proposed submission. 2. The area adjacent to the Standal property should be designated as public open space 150 feet from the center line of the Riley Creek. 3. Road Connection: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the wording that was included in the supplemental staff report. In addition, they felt that an option three should also be considered when the transportation study is done for connecting Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. This option would be a right in, right out connection from Eden Prairie Road to 212. SAF:mdd Frenzen.memo/Smaz[98 /t) PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 4 B. CHARLSON PROPERTY by Lynn Charlson. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,medium Density Residential, and Office on 440 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. C. BROWN PROPERTY by David Brown. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan changes from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and office on 11.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail, west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. D. STANDAL PROPERTY by Carol and John Standal. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential,Medium Density Residential, and office on 24.4 acres. Location: South of Pioneer Trail,west of Eden Prairie Road and north of Highway 169/212. Franzen stated staff has requested the Planning Commission to review Items B,C,and D together as they comprise one project. He noted the proponents had requested separate review in case on portion of the project should be denied. John Uban representing all three proponents, reviewed the project's history and described the final plan they have submitted for approval. The land is located to the south and west of Flying Cloud Airport. He discussed the existing roads and the new roadway system they are proposing. They are also proposing to connect Eden Prairie Road with Spring Lake Road and close the access onto Highway 212, which would direct the major portions of the traffic onto the new roadway which will gain access farther to the east. This roadway will also serve the airport expansion areas as well. He discussed the Guide Plan Amendments they are proposing which he hoped would be approved. The airport will be acquiring portions of this property for their expansion, and he indicated these areas on the plans. He noted they are actively pursuing acquisition at this time but no formal offers have been tendered. He discussed the proposed uses that will be in which areas of the site. They are proposing office/commercial uses adjacent to the airport. He showed a plan which would be the land use designations they believe are the most appropriate and most likely to happen. He stated they have been working with adjacent landowners to develop the best plan possible for this area which will give some flexibility and be the best way to develop this area. Clinton asked about the relocation of Spring Road and what it would be and Uban responded the road from Pioneer Trail to Highway 212 is a larger roadway to handle more of the traffic which will preserve the existing Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road as much as possible. Clinton asked about the connection between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road and if this issue had been resolved. Uban responded they have 11 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 5 two ways to make this connection and it has not yet been studied by the City to determine which way will be the best way to do this. Foote asked what type of industrial uses would be adjacent to the airport and Uban responded it will probably be corporate headquarters or office buildings on 40-plus care sites. It would not be heavy industrial uses. Dom asked what the airport would do with the land and Uban responded that they need it to have a safety zone and install some lights. There would not be a major change in the terrain from modifications they would make. The area south of the airport will be used for corporate hangars and a ponding area will also be included in this portion of the site. This level will be on the same level as the present airport, and the remaining land between this point and Highway 212 will terrace down to the lower elevation. Dom asked about where the single family housing would be located on the western portion of the site and Uban reviewed the site plan and described the landscaping in this area. Dorn asked if the airport was agreeable to the proposed alignment of the roadway through their property from the church to the south and Uban responded that they have not yet purchased this land but they have been working with them to be sure they participate in the design of this system to facilitate good planning for the City. Discussion ensued regarding the roadway elevations adjacent to the airport and the amount of clearance required for aircraft at the end of the runway. Franzen noted there were two alternatives for roadway alignments. A decision can't be made at a concept level of planning. Final road locations are done at the Rezoning stage when more detailed information is available. Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval of all three projects. The density will be limited to the roadway capacity. The Public Hearing was opened. Eileen Benz,9775 Spring Road,stated her home is sandwiched between both projects and she is opposed to both. She was concerned about the roadway configurations, noise levels, lighting and other impacts from the development. She was concerned about the light industrial uses and exactly what that would be. She noted that there was concern for the impact of these uses on the new properties that were being developed, and asked that the Planning Commission give the same concern to the existing properties as the project developed. Gray described the traffic levels they anticipate on the new roadways and noted they anticipate very little change from what is there now. It is possible that they could have the primary point of ingress/egress from Highway 212. There will be an increase of traffic on Spring road because it is a County Road and it is part of the transportation system in the region. Staff anticipates that Spring Road will remain a two lane road although a significant one. It will probably stay that way for the next twenty years. Sandstad asked about the connection with Highway 212 and if they would have a stop �2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 6 sign or signal there because that intersection is located on a hill. Gray responded that they would like to have a signal and this could result in some work being done on Highway 212 to level out that hill. He described the elevations in the area and the relationship between the new runway and the new roadway. Gray discussed the proposed connection between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road and the reasons why this should be done. They would be improving major access spacing and preserving the character of Eden Prairie Road. By making this connection it will eliminate Eden Prairie Road as a through road. There are also some opportunities to work with MAC to improve the number of access points by perhaps creating a frontage road along the airport. Hibbert Hill, 10131 Eden Prairie Road,was concerned about sewer and water coming in and if he would be assessed. Gray stated it would be coming in but he could not say what the assessment would be for his property because there were many variables included in the assessment formula. Hill was concerned about having people from the industrial area access Spring Road and Gray responded that it was a County road and from a safety standpoint it was best to have more than one connection for this new roadway. Staff anticipates that most of the traffic will use the new road and not Spring Road. Hill asked about the water rationing and commented that now they are extending the areas of service and whether that was a conflict. Gray stated the City is bringing the new water plant on line but water restrictions will be used to control peak demand times to assure an adequate water supply. Eden Prairie has a more than adequate water supply for the community. Hill inquired if he would be able to opt out of the sewer and water expansion and Gray responded that the Metropolitan Council's philosophy was that all communities should move toward the expansion of utilities. Hill stated he had not been consulted by the developers of the project and they stated they had met with the neighbors. He felt that their rights were being ignored by the proponents of the development. Gray stated this project was still at the concept level and not a finely detailed plan which means that they look at what most residents would want in the way of transportation systems. There is flexibility to determine details as the plan is developed in the future. Franzen stated that Staff held a neighborhood meeting at the Planning Commission meeting last December and the plan was not satisfactory which is why they came back to the Planning Commission with this proposal. Habicht asked what Hill thought of this plan aside from the roadway issues and Hill responded that as long as they were aware they were giving up the last part of natural land in Eden Prairie, it was a good plan. Jim Van Winkle, 10129 Eden Prairie Road, stated he did not understand how the City could make the connection from Eden Prairie Road across private land to Spring Road. He felt it was absolutely foolish to put housing at the end of a runway especially multiple family housing,because of all the difficulties they were having in Richfield with the MSP airport. Bert Noterman, owner of The Lion's Tap Restaurant, stated he also owned ten acres north of that site. He planned to have residential housing on this land. He was /3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 7 adjacent to this development site and was not contacted regarding this project. He wanted to be sure that his property was protected. He was concerned about roadway access to his property so he could develop it later on without having to damage the trees. Regarding the issue of airport expansion,he was aware that it was going to happen. He was concerned if it would create a greater hazard by closing the access onto Eden Prairie Road than if it were left open. He was concerned about access to his business and how the road reconfiguration would impact that. Dennis Davie, 9900 Spring Road, stated he felt the proponents had done a good job in planning the project but there were some things that were confusing. The roadway configuration changes were the most confusing. He discussed traffic flow patterns in the area now and stated he was concerned about the added traffic from the new development being added to it. Gray stated while there is some cut-through traffic onto Eden Prairie Road today,the majority of trips stay on Spring Road. These are details that will be worked out with the final plans. The grades will have an impact on the roadway configuration. He discussed the Highway 212 intersection with Spring Road and explained why it was a better connection than Eden Prairie Road would be. David stated he had abundant wildlife in his yard, and felt that single family homes along Eden Prairie Road should be supported. He did not agree with the medium density housing area that was being proposed. He had to get a variance to have his home and he felt the density proposed was too great a volume for this area of Eden Prairie. He was also concerned about the designated office/industrial use being proposed. Franzen stated the proposed land use designation would require the buildings be 75% office and 25%industrial,or it would be possible to have a multi-story office building on that site. He reviewed the standards for this zoning district and noted that staff wanted to preserve as many natural features as possible. John Standal stated he was one of the proponents of the development and he and his wife had a tree farm on this property for the last twenty years. They now feel it is time for a change in their lifestyle and they want to reduce their workload. He requested the Planing Commission to approve the project. Gene Gray, 9040 Sunrise Circle, stated he was opposed to the project and felt Eden Prairie did not need another industrial park or more housing. He urged the Planning Commission to deny the project and requested the City to purchase the land and dedicate it to the Audubon Society. Habicht asked if he would support this measure as a taxpayer, and Gray responded he would if the price was right. Gray stated the owners of the property were the proponents of this development but the City has also had some plans regarding how they believed this area should be developed. MAC has stipulated to the City that the land adjacent to the airport should not be residential in character. Sandstad commented he thought it was a very nice property and it would be nice to have a large budget and be able to purchase the land as suggested by Mr. Gray. However, it would be difficult to come up with the $2 Million plus in funding it would take to purchase these properties, and it was not IL' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 8 practical to deny the project on that basis. Lloyd Walin, 9978 Windsor Terrace, commented that if the property which is proposed to be developed as industrial would have traffic coming from the south it might also have traffic coming from the north as well. It was his understanding that the City Council had taken a position that the airport expansion should not take place. Foote commented that the City has opposed the expansion but the City does not have any say in it if MAC comes up with the funding to purchase the land. Sandstad stated this plan works both ways and the Planning Commission has supported the City Council position regarding the airport expansion issue. Vicky Small, 1655 Beverly Drive, stated MAC has a history of not holding up it's agreements with the City and she wanted to know if there were any legal documents that would hold them to this. Gray responded that historically the realignment of Spring Road has been part of the City's transportation plan for twenty years. In this plan it is a critical element and we need to have further discussion as to how this will be implemented. This realignment could be a 1999 project as well as the new roadway and the connection to Highway 212. This should be made a condition of approval for the developer. This would be included in the Developer's Agreement if the plan should be approved then MAC would have to honor these things if they acquire the land before the project is completed. Severin Peterson, 15900 Flying Cloud Drive, stated he lives at the northeast corner of Highway 212 and Spring Road. He has not seen the plan before tonight and his interest is in compatibility with the proposed development. He could relate to some of the concerns voiced by the neighbors and his family has a lot of history in the area. Things have changed in Eden Prairie and it will continue to change. He requested a meeting with the proponents to share his concerns. He was concerned about the impacts of the roadway changes, and safety issues were also of great importance. Loren Wattke, 16860 Flying Cloud Drive, stated he no longer uses the Eden Prairie Road access onto Highway 212 because it is too dangerous and he was glad it was going to be closed off. He has received the impression that the City has given up regarding the issue of the airport expansion and since all of southern Eden Prairie was going to be impacted by MAC,he felt it should not be taken lightly. If the airport is expanded there will be some large planes coming into Eden Prairie and he asked the City again to oppose the expansion. Alexander stated she thought the plan was good for the area but was sad to see the open area go. The homes that were going to be built in this area will be impacted by Flying Cloud airport and even if it does not expand there will be noise impacts from it on these homes. She was not sure that the plan should go ahead now or if it needed to have more refinement. Sandstad stated it was a very large project but it was a concept plan. He was opposed to the airport expansion. He supported the proposal and was comfortable with the project as proposed. Habicht concurred and noted that some of the more intense uses PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 9 on the south side were dependent on the new roadway which he wanted to know if the roadway was going to be built. Gray responded that the project should be approved with the stipulation that the roadway be there to support this type of land use. The proponents wil have to work with MnDOT to get this done prior to proceeding with the development. Franzen stated the Developers Agreement will identify the land uses, types of uses, and the roadways that will have to be built prior to implementation of the project. Habicht responded he was comfortable with the changes to the Guide Plan with this type of provision included in the Developers Agreement. Lewis stated she was comfortable with the mix of uses in concept. In this area with the proximity to the airport industrial is the best use of that land. The City will have final review and approval of what will go there. The Eden Prairie Road/Highway 212 intersection was very hazardous and she was in favor of closing it. Clinton stated he was not 100%in favor of the airport expansion and he was well aware of the noise that emanates from the airport. There will not be a significant change in the size of theplanes that use the airport regardless of whether it expands or not. A concept plan uF P eP g is not always what is built on a given site. He supported the concept plan as proposed. Dorn stated he supported the concept plan,particularly the access location change onto Highway 212. Foote stated he agreed with the other Commissioners and supported the Concept Plan. Specific details will be worked out as each phase of the project moves forward. He was opposed to the airport expansion and he has concerns about MAC wanting to expand the airport even further in the future. Franzen stated that staff would have a definition for office and multi-family residential use prior to City Council review of the project, so they will know what is expected. MOTION: Sandstad moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Sandstad moved,seconded by Clinton,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Lynn Charlson for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open Space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Office on 440 acres based on Plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Dom, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of David Brown for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and office on 11.4 acres based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. �IP PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 10 MOTION: Habicht moved, seconded by Alexander, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Carol and John Standal for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential and Public Open space/Park/Floodplain to Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Office on 24.4 acres based on plans dated April 24, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. v. D. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger HTG BUILDING Scott A. Kipp Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for Rezoning from Rural to Office on .86 acres; 3. Adopt the Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Office on .86 acres; 4. Adopt the Resolution for Preliminary Plat of.86 acres into one lot; and 5. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: The proposal is for construction of a single-story, 4,200 square foot office building on 0.86 acres. The project will require a change to the guide plan from Low Density Residential to Office. Plan revisions have taken place to shift the building and parking to the east,and to add large conifers on the back side of the site based on the staff report and Planning Commission recommendations. The trash area will be relocated within the building,and the ground mounted mechanical equipment has been shifted to the north side of the building. The lighting has not been revised as recommended in the Staff Report. This should be a condition of Council approval. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the project at the April 27, 1998 meeting based on an easterly shift of the building and parking, and additional larger conifers(see Staff Report). This gives the adjoining residential neighborhood to the west a larger buffer and more trees as a transition. Parks,Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission Recommendation: The Commission did not review this project. Board of Adjustments and Appeals Review: The shift in parking to a 17.5 foot setback from Hennepin Town Road will require a variance from the Board of Adjustments and Appeals at its June 11, 1998 meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for Comprehensive Guide Plan Change 2. Resolution for Preliminary Plat 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated April 27, 1998 4. Staff Report dated April 24, 1998 5. Correspondence. Z HTG BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Municipal Plan("Plan"); and, WHEREAS,the Plan has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment; and WHEREAS, the proposal of HTG Building by James R. Grover for a 4,200 square foot office building requires the amendment of the Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota,hereby adopts the amendment of the Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval as follows: .86 acres from Low Density Residential to Office located at 9300 and 9310 Hennepin Town Road. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk S HTG BUILDING CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HTG BUILDING FOR JAMES R. GROVER BE IT RESOLVED,by the Eden Prairie City Council as follows: That the preliminary plat of HTG Building for James R. Grover dated May 12, 1998, consisting of .86 acres into one lot, a copy of which is on file at the City Hall,is found to be in conformance with the provisions of the Eden Prairie Zoning and Platting ordinances, and amendments thereto, and is herein approved. ADOPTED by the Eden Prairie City Council on the 19th day of May, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk LI PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 2 A. HTG BUILDING by James R. Grover. Request for Comprehensive Guide Plan Changes from Low Density Residential to Office on .86 acres,Rezoning from Rural to Office on.86 acres,Site Plan Review on.86 acres and Preliminary Plat of.86 acres into one lot. Location: 9300 and 9310 Townline Avenue South. James Grover, Vice President of HTG Architects and Manager of HTG Properties showed a rendering of the proposed building and reviewed the plans for this site. He described the reception at the neighborhood meeting they held and commented it was favorable overall. There may be some noise from the HVAC equipment but they have done what they can to mitigate this. There will only be three air conditioning units outside and they will move the trash location to the inside of the building. Dorn was concerned about the proposed location of the trash and the ability of the garbage trucks to get into this area without having to back up in the traffic lanes of the parking log. Grover stated that the trucks come early in the morning before there are cars in the parking lot and should not have any problem gaining access because there will be a sidewalk to the enclosure. Clinton asked how many employees will be at this location and Grover responded there will be ten employees working on site because they meet with most of their clients off-site. Dorn was concerned if they should move into another facility and another use would move into the building if the parking would be adequate for a use such as a chiropractic office. Grover responded that their loan requires a twenty-year lease and the business would have to be absolutely phenomenal for them to grow out of this facility. Franzen stated the parking requirements for medical office and general office are the same and staff was comfortable that adequate parking will be available for any office use of the building. Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended that the proponents move the building closer to the frontage road to give more green space on the site. Staff considered doing this sufficient reason to change the guide plan. Alexander asked questions regarding the location of the parking lot and the trees that are presently located in this area. Fr.n7en described the landscaping plan changes and noted that the trees would have to be relocated. Habicht asked if the proponent was okay with the changes recommended by staff and Grover responded that they were for the most part but there were a few things they would like to work out with staff. The Public Hearing was opened. Roy Prevost,9662 Clark Circle,was concerned with the height of the lighting which might impact his property. He asked that the light source not be visible from the west. He noted that most of the houses are two-story and it would be undesirable to have to look at the lights. He asked about the sewer location and Grover described the proposed sewer location where he hoped it would be brought into the site. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 3 Mahmoud Yousefzadeh, 9652 Clark Circle, asked what would happen if the sewer came onto his land. Gray responded that the pipe would be 2-3" in diameter which is very reliable and it would be under low pressure(under 15 psi)as compared to the water pressure which is usually about 80 psi. There is very little chance of this type of pipe bursting when it is properly installed in the proposed manner which is a hole bored through the soil. Mahmoud asked if there was any way to locate the sewer so it was not adjacent to his land. Gray responded it was a very good way to provide the service and while it was not 100%guaranteed,it was the best way to accomplish this. The risks are very minor compared to the benefits. Mahmoud was concerned about the garbage truck coming at 4-5 a.m. and the noise from that. He commented there was no way to guarantee that this company will remain in business for the next twenty years and what will happen if they leave. Franzen responded that the property will be zoned for office uses and that is all that would be permitted to go into that building. Dom commented that when the subdivision these residents presently reside in was planned an easement was set aside for the sewer and this easement has been there for twenty years. Sandstad commented he believed the project was good as long as Attachment B was followed. He thought the building aesthetically pleasing and supported the project. Lewis concurred and suggested that the developer be sensitive to the lighting in the parking lot so it did not adversely impact the neighbors. Clinton stated he supported the plan with Attachment B and noted that garbage pickup could not commence until 7:00 a.m. MOTION: Clinton moved, seconded by Sandstad to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION:Clinton moved,seconded by Sandstad,to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of James R. Grover for Comprehensive Guide Plan Changes from Low Density Residential to Office on .86 acres,Rezoning from Rural to Office on .86 acres, Site Plan Review on.86 acres and Preliminary Plat of.86 acres into one lot based on plans dated march 26, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott A. Kipp, Senior Planner DATE: April 24, 1998 SUBJECT: HTG Office Building APPLICANT: James Grover OWNER: TGP Properties LOCATION: 9300 and 9310 Hennepin Town Road REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Office on 0.86 acres. 2. Zoning district change from Rural to Office on 0.86 acres. 3. Site Plan Review on 0.86 acres. 4. Preliminary Plat of 0.86 acres into one lot. Ilno. , 1 (1) •• :.: 7319 4.; ....* .. .. ...: .1• • PARK DISTRICT .. . - -• 1 . I •,. -; I . . . .. ..: - .S . 141.§ . .' O... . . ;SD •'' . . .3 . . N'•••• . ,„ , e' W Sil • --_,---------------------- .......:4:0; 2v &ES; •444 •------ 3 '- „ • •t•- . A . IA i ,.,,..7.,t2L-- ,3s...• - -171,- 20S-----;1.5t.7,4:4g-7 -7-: i:3 - • .., 7,‘• ,c4." 44i a --• . A vi. ' ..$ V : ;%)1?3•,)4 0.,, • c ..O1 ;:i I ' 1 t6•0;.i.,)'1-...-7.s‘.._.,,..:-r- r...•1 S.6 . . - s & 33. . 1 ......,..-,r.,1:-... ...._,,..- a it _ it • • ,,,,._:,,..-71,-;:). x...42 006.3 3,-• .,. , ••., ._...4:5_,.:4) .8.....41.• ••' . 7,11.4 , I6 11, 'A:: '7, ,..22 . ..' e•••• • -2 . . ,,,,t l SE 4 ,.49.111.4. 3 1 "T./ • '... .? LF • •.XL.. ..,...1 9/ .r...‘r7-00si (BM • VI 2; ... ' ". e. 03:11A744 I . 34 A .4' • •••.:52 i..: i Os '.1. .gg,•3 i r ;,) Z (7) , . :-.-• is I) . = 3 t 7 , -‘ . ,).14' •"' -" & -•i (25) 2 a - - 4 6-J,,,,L0, : . . . •J- . 11A 1)31 1 34 ' a --. r (52) .4.A 3 „ • -7::` . Fr.. ; vi ) 93:. ••••14:421171.I . - :40151). a ft.t ,,,, i .4%24 - . 0,., 2 1, s . ...;,,..”.-s• "::.; a c 6) ..' 3 o* i CI 14 -:3' v...., E ? / • L . CC .1 CO _ 4,,.. • •47 9 ;.. .. :.-• a A.NS -,.• :? ; •..r,( 2)3 .7. ,6 (54) ‘''°°:4* - Z• II) ,c, . ,.,3 -.t (35) ... .., ... ;7"... t 3 cor cz ' • cc • '$ ..-4,1> b 35. % .rs' ) . v- I • -, 11. ,. 75) .1 t631 3 .•*, (14, ' . • fli ...... ' . 1) * • a.....el....• . . (33..E... 4 cp4.4....4„.......• V ... •sti ; 3 •••sro•sq A ' ' Last •P 4/(77) ,:, ii.20)- 1 ,. „ .i, r .:• 3 ' :3,21 .. (51) „ (-; :457 ' 4 .• :4„,*•, I.% s . ...* ., - - (76) .6, 1•1 ,i, ,..;;;(31:•. ..s.33 .i. ,1:16.‘1. ; sii , • 41::: i 0 i•-•-•....\ s 0 3 ‘9) • -- - ...s.. . 1 4 • -. . 3 357` CA` 4, ' %/(.14)8 •."*. . •- , tr) I, E - -1.--(4)1 , a) (47) •\,?- -32 ;11;°A...• - : ! (27) • .3 (75) •P (741 .. - °1) ...,,7 . . . ._. , !1.- ti. . '•- it V -. ,.• 8.••‘::,*$88 I LLJ • r.- -• 4.• l'.. %.i3 +1•16i, t s:13‘6,t't ..1:, -;•- ! II . '•4 3,, i'. :13) -.... . ' > . I i. . .. 1.'i", •,.. J• • VV. ' .. %' .‘ ' -2- •0 .•1' -s.se rl 34K ..1'..i • 11' :. 1 3 t\f .e.-.. . ' •'e (n) , *, . $8 l'e001. --. ,_ •',' "r I , • el .2. 7 100111r '. '2 (62.: (7,5)- 1.• i .' r . 4...N., . . .4...,;t1•;t6•5, . 4 • 's-P-, r38t•ti 1- .... i 2. (39)14;4011.;41)17„ .r: t .••,"ss 1 4:., (72)r - Is s ,s; 31 _2 , I-. - • - .. 3 i 4 : 2 ;3,43 (2) t -J (67) !. Acii . 11•144 fr 77 1 ., ... ... .. .T. •• •• I ' . . . Z I ( •to IQ 1 35) - • 2(56). Z; .41 (71) 4.2 t 13) --?1 • 1 0 2 4 a. Z3 g 1 • - (10) r•CL . 3 t 4'41 34 ••• .4. 4(70) % ,. 33 . l 51 •'' Z (35) Z. it ....i65)2. .. .. „„ ... • t, . •:1 - i •.• . s - 4" G 3 42•• (9) . , E' - U1 'Tr I- '16 ri = .1. '-7:7671' . ,..' -1.1.6ri. # I;•-••••? vs 4 •-.. rr, ..(161):1 ..• !N.. .. . t 23 4- 4 j, ).1 0.8 , 2 4 4:61... (60) ' • (33) ...... .3, . . , • 72 - 4 33 , • z.4 .T(35) 9,. ••.. i CIR ill *. 42. )...° 88.., .4 n 0'(37) oisitot a co 114.36 . 4 3 ' 4.• $ 14 - . . „ ' • ..‘• Z44 051 (52) ej - (71) 42 1 I If.,.!?4,4 ... ,. , , 21 c is -•• 0,, • 1671• 8 3 i. ‘9, (55) ,„.• 77., '7, (15 • • . A 4 2.t z ST • ..1. ..7' (70)1. z I) '• 1 133 )14 .' .(52) . (55) . „ s„ 69), s .' ,, . :•• P.P. 1- %-. (52) ,-• .'N‘.. . g (66) ' • 3 ' its It..3 75 _ . . i. 11 .4** - %. (32) 1211.SI AO - . ..! Th. 14 + .,:k• 11 , 1- - 31 34 . vt.33.31 611- a ?I'4$ t Ibt" •(46)a(47) i .I • 27 - 12 ,-1, (65) • ' (.11) pi(42)rz(4.3) U(44) (43) .4 3 t 7 v(48) " , i fi • a • 2 4 3 ..: 4 • 3 4." - 3 (16) :)- .. ..a 29* - 47!!".•"I 3 - 2 -.4 .-* -' ,' " -IA - 'io - 4 , 44 '4 •.:77.0 1 , .• '.., . • • • " ,S9i n .• 4, ! • Ia.* .. • 141 . .!-- 1;;.• R-I-S , : ... , . r.9 , a Ma . •r.o.,,--.41,4-7-7--4S.101'1,1,0 st (X1) /5 • 0.45.- • •X_?I i st •Th 1 rt 1 s9) n$' 6t'.To -v•6I L r 1..2 (,2•„;.)4.• 6 " .•13 X 2 (83)- ; : .(20): 21) 92) . 3) 4) " (2C)r3 . 1 I 22Foi1rr ' ' 1 t '3 T 7 'III :1.4 4.• Ft )".".' mot ,0•-•••1.,•,, (33) '3k41 '15- (64) sr 37 (BRIC;a0IN LA slib.".Yri .. • (153) ... 10 044 .i .. 4• a e 3C 1.94•11'2rt . TErrir 1 02 as 2.14 .,,t %SP e,,..er,¢0 111 It it, \.,tilii, .,, __:_ff '51I 4..,‘". 4",r° %.‘:".....elE ' •X) I - *m,A.. • 4. ' 44-42 can 4 Staff Report HTG Office Building April 24, 1998 • BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan shows the site as Low Density Residential. The property is zoned Rural. Surrounding land use consists of the Preserve Village Mall to the north shown as Community Commercial,with Low Density Residential to the south, and west. New Highway 169 and Hennepin Town Road, and a noise wall are to the east. • In 1986, a 10,000 sq. ft.,two-story bank building was proposed for this site. This proposal was later withdrawn because of the concern of building size and the transition to the neighboring property. A 1989 proposal for an office use on the site, with commercial and industrial uses on the sites to the south was also withdrawn after a denial recommendation by the Planning Commission. Reasons for denial included the size of proposed buildings,an inadequate transition, and inconsistency with the exterior building material requirements. In addition, safety was a concern because the proposals showed direct access onto the two lane County Road 18 at that time. With both proposals, the Planning Commission said office uses might be acceptable if the sites develop as low intensity single- story buildings with residential character with an effective transition to the neighboring properties. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN CHANGE The proponent is requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan change from Low Density Residential to Office on 0.86 acres for development of a 4,200 sq. ft. office building. There must be compelling reasons for changing the Comprehensive Guide Plan. As part of this discussion, the Commission should consider the following questions: 1. Does the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan change the balance of land uses in the community? No. This small amount of acreage will not have an affect on the balance of land use within the City. 2. Will the change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan be compatible with surrounding land uses? The site abuts a frontage road and 15 foot high noise wall to Highway 169 to the east, as well as the Preserve Village Mall to the north. Low Density Residential land use on the site could be developed, but may be a less desirable land use due to these factors. A small office use would be compatible if an adequate transition to the existing single-family to the west takes place, and the architecture is residential in character. 2 q Staff Report HTG Office Building April 24, 1998 • A change in land use for office on this site could result in proposals for office uses on the undeveloped sites to the south. If this were to occur,usingsingle-story structures with low P g rY site coverage,providing adequate transitions to the existing neighborhood, and maintaining residential architecture,the sites could also be compatible. 3. Is there a traffic impact on the adjoining road system. No. The frontage road has the capacity to handle the traffic generated from the amount of office use proposed. 4. How does the Comprehensive Guide Plan impact the sites natural features. There are limited natural site features for the property. The site is level,and contains some significant trees around the perimeter. The two houses have been removed,but the garages remain. The proposed use preserves 74% of the existing significant trees on site. These impacts would be similar if developed as Low Density Residential. 5. Does the development plan as proposed meet City code requirements. Yes. The proposal meets City Codes. SITE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT The proposal is for construction of a single-story, 4,200 square foot office building and a preliminary plat of 0.86 acres into one lot. The base area ratio and floor area ratio is .11. The City Code permits up to a .30 base area ratio and a .50 floor area ratio in the Office district. The previous office proposals ranged between .19 and .24, and included a two-story structure for one of the proposals, and industrial use with the other. The amount of parking required is 21 spaces. The plan shows 23 spaces meeting this requirement. The setbacks for building and parking meet City Code. TRANSITION Transition to adjoining residential property can be achieved by the use of setbacks, low building coverage, landscaping, and residential design. The building meets the setbacks for the office district, has a very low site coverage and shows a 3 /() Staff Report HTG Office Building April 24, 1998 • residential design, consistent with the past Planning Commission discussions for compatibility. GRADING AND DRAINAGE There are 122 caliper inches of significant trees(10 trees)on the property. The trees are mainly white poplar and Norway spruce. Tree loss is calculated at 26%. This compares to the average tree loss of 40%for office projects, and 30% for residential projects. Tree replacement is 11 caliper inches. The tree replacement will be included in the landscaping plan. Due to the limited impervious area, a NURP pond will not be constructed, but rather a cash contribution will be made to the Storm Water Utility. Drainage will be directed via storm sewer to catch basins in Hennepin Town Road. UTILITIES Water is available in Hennepin Town Road. Sanitary sewer is proposed from Clark Circle using pressurized mains to serve the site and future uses to the south. All construction will need to take place within the existing drainage and utility easements. LANDSCAPING The amount of landscaping required is based on caliper inches according to building size and how well it provides screening of parking areas and buffering to adjacent land uses. The amount of caliper inches required based on building size and tree replacement is 24 inches. This amount of landscaping does not provide the necessary buffering to the residential land use to the west. Additional conifers of 12 feet and 14 feet should be provided as shown on attachment A. ARCHITECTURE The single-story building is 13 feet tall and has a pitched roof. The exterior material requirements of the office district are met for 75%face brick and glass. The mechanical equipment and trash area are proposed on the back side of the building. Due to the residential land use to the west, both the mechanical and trash areas should be contained within the building, or located on the north side of the building and enclosed within a face brick enclosure. Due to the neighboring residential land use, no wall pack lighting should be used on the building, no lighting on the back side of the building, and pole lighting should be limited to 20 foot downcast shoe box fixtures. 4 !1 Staff Report HTG Office Building April 24, 1998 • CONCLUSION The Staff is comfortable with the proposed plan with the addition of the landscaping as shown in attachment A. If the Planning Commission feels that a better transition is needed,the proposal can be improved by shifting the building and parking farther to the east according to attachment B. This would provide a greater distance from the single-family housing. The need for a parking setback variance to the frontage road would be required, but may have merit for transition purposes. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Alternative I If the PlanningCommission believes that Guide Plan Change is acceptable, that impacts on the g P � P surrounding area are low and can be mitigated, then one option would be to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Change from Low Density Residential to Office on 0.86 acres, Zoning District Change from Rural to Office on 0.86 acres, Site Plan Review on 0.86 acres, and Preliminary Plat of 0.86 acres into one lot based on plans dated March 26, 1998, and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998, and the following: 1. Prior to City Council review, the proponent shall: A. Revise the landscape plan according to attachment A for adequate buffering to the residential land use. B. Relocate the mechanical and trash area within the building, or on the north side of the building within a face brick enclosure. C. Revise the lighting standards to be a downcast cutoff shoebox fixture not exceeding 20 feet. No wall packs will be on the building, an no lighting will be permitted on the back side of the building. 2. Prior to Final Plat approval,the proponent shall submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer and Watershed District. 3. Prior to Grading permit issuance, the proponent shall provide the cash contribution to the Storm Water Utility in lieu of constructing a NURP pond. 5 Staff Report HTG Office Building April 24, 1998 4. Prior to Building permit issuance, the proponent shall: • A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and tree replacement bond for review. Alternative II If the Planning Commission believes that the Guide Plan Change is acceptable, but that additional setback from the residential land use to the west is necessary, then one option would be to recommend approval based on the conditions of alternative I and include the shift of the building and parking according to attachment B. Alternative III If the Planning Commission believes that the Guide Plan Change is not acceptable, that impacts on the surrounding area are high, then one option would be to recommend denial. Staff recommends Alternative I 6 I _1 .Ai ND; 4uTUH al -it_F . 0 ir i, 0 Alb:. _ _____ _ _ _ L___' _ ___1 7 04,WirfA/4-111,#1.ASAFIPPAII\ d — ter 'Al I I I PI'. A I I 1174 'IPI- '. .- '1 . A, - �Si ir'it1 .4.'4 4 III ~' �� SN AREA 1 — — x 15r,.+c A:-r,.,�:i7AF -vest -- nOnIEY.�:.LXT Ili \\��\\\ _--� fi .1,i• i; n sAr Y 0 ),..__(.. 1 • :(ISM I ?; - -- ! r� -2,.. . ) , , if 2 I. ,1-- I. %1 \ 7 .. Ii '‘,.rae r t > . :I - - _ I S P�4 x .vii ''�� Z. ; i --I�o .lA A J--.E Yq.w5 1`..;,'h^ I - I rxc- ,tih wH,TE f'cPPA • 4 — � . • ) \l — —.1 _ r � j; � 1 :OMHorJ EUDNY,"IUS r l2..'-'-,, I'. If lc tMEzILA ( i i �j I IMPE i-/AL N;,NEYJAJ�T 1 i r • i /.1 �� I AiTMJJ BLAZE MLPLE f� oa • - cx, T,,/c NOCWAY spc„cc 4010 r--- '► "':!: Exis-riNq 'T1t EC S x, T,u[-, •rnrrr FGY.AL I, ?.EVI $ED L4I'JDA?E Arr#4.tHME NT' A • ,g . NT._ („,, ,„-1,11:04,4 - A lt-1E66' ' '---- ts-- - --- • itiggis1PC - •may = An*,0.� Linirt- il — p%.•-_tom- / V .. ; ` - . A YE Z.' A L ._ L v 4 0 „1......bt .. 1 ` `r,\ , / ram 6! ' II S4 0 ZA,'• . , r 4 4 . , --- ---- _ . r i E lorit. . • 1 _—iill:k . 1: - • -I, ••7 7 A .---- - r- t I 4#0• .:• S SP (010p40.` A.: r I "ile..." ir Ill Y-G c, 14 H,T 7fL4 .1711. _ I -_OMHorJ =UO.\'r HIS• �r•I. G ' - :� S'/ '$ CON1 FER j (I � IyI) I IMPS�..atr LI NE YE ,_._ST 0,1 fp A 4, . ,..../C-, A•402 1.../4 r" 4 pc ocz- -'` i 7 ExISTIN4 TRIES C __ 411:41V. 49..... - - - - - - - .. - ) ...' ISJGR EA S a b 51?TBAcIç lc A'rrAo-s11EtJ-r 1111 .. • ,^:+_-ac .. ., Y..:sM.Tstr' ;-�.'M -- ' ;.n:`•.'a`^-..;--'•�'-^i ._-.z..9^; ; .^4 �- - _ .mac,-....- . ti -c£.`ax --:i=';.r - /15 • EDEN PRAIRIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 5-19-98 SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM NO. V. DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Community Development Chris Enger FULLER ROAD BUSINESS CENTER Michael D. Franzen Requested Council Action: The Staff recommends that the Council take the following action: 1. Close the Public Hearing; 2. Adopt the Resolution for PUD Concept Review on 7.02 acres; 3. Approve 1st Reading of the Ordinance for PUD District Review on 7.02 acres and Rezoning from I-General to I-2 Industrial on 7.02 acres; 4. Direct Staff to prepare a Development Agreement incorporating Commission and Staff recommendations (and Council conditions). Background: This is a 74,000 square foot industrial building which meets City requirements. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommendation voted unanimously to approve the project at the April 27, 1998 meeting. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation The Parks Commission recommendation voted 6-0 to approve the project at the May 5, 1998 meeting. Supporting Reports: 1. Resolution for PUD Concept Review 2. Staff Report dated 4-23-98 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 4-27-98 I FULLER ROAD BUSINESS CENTER CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT REVIEW OF FULLER ROAD BUSINESS CENTER FOR MOUNT PROPERTIES WHEREAS,the City of Eden Prairie has by virtue of City Code provided for the Planned Unit Development (PUD)Concept of certain areas located within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did conduct a public hearing on the Fuller Road Business Center PUD Concept Review by Mount Properties and considered their request for approval for development(and waivers)and recommended approval of the requests to the City Council; and, WHEREAS,the City Council did consider the request on May 19, 1998; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Eden Prairie,Minnesota, as follows: 1. Fuller Road Business Center,being in Hennepin County,Minnesota,legally described as outlined in Exhibit A, is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That the City Council does grant PUD Concept approval as outlined in the plans dated May 12, 1998. 3. That the PUD Concept meets the recommendations of the Planning Commission dated April 27, 1998. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eden Prairie this 19th day of May, 1998. Jean L. Harris, Mayor ATTEST: Donald R. Uram, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A Fuller Road Business Center LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, except that part of the North 390.98 feet of said Lot 3 (as measured at right angles to that part of the North line of said Lot 3 having a record dimension of 398.11 feet) which lies Westerly of a line 60.00 feet Northwesterly of, measured at right angles to and parallel with the Southwesterly extension of that part of the Northwesterly line of Lot 2 having a record dimension of 426.00 feet, Block 1, Eden Prairie Industrial Park (The Southeast and Southwest boundaries of which have been marked by Judicial Landmarks set by Order of the Court in Torrens Case 18820), according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County. 3 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D. Franzen, City Planner DATE: April 23, 1998 SUBJECT: Fuller Road Business Center APPLICANT: Mount Properties FEE OWNER: John Smith LOCATION: Fuller Road REQUEST: P 1. Planned Unit Development Concept Amendment on 7.02 acres. 2. Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.02 acres. 3. Rezoning from I-General to I-2 Industrial on 7.02 acres. 4. Site Plan Review on 7.02 acres. 1 • 1• I RD. API ..rftill luti P..•ti • ' r -, ' + CIRCLE ' •, ) :r•A nr-"'"---% ..., I ' I. .1 --- '--------11...._........-----DRIIE >111"1 .III A.,i---.-LL .... . li iller WESTGATE E-- 1 -:- r 11111- 1 - ---- il. I Ell 41.., WESTQATE —./ • • 1 IIIII isr -...... , •i . : 1111111M0 —1 im,H1011111 lis $ • .. OM lk S / T-- I ,10 ., • Howl ..... -1-----i P $ •Pf __,-i, 14 E 4%97. . ilkA;RI I 5711 II `-1/ E , 116-i • / 40/ WAG ...,!. .A.,;., ,...f....., ....,,. . . .... •s„,. _ b• • • :::•• ma .• . \-,,,..-. , . .„..0 ..., ... 7.• ,i,, . . . T.H , ,....1 t7—• ril ,......;.,i - . I / NM 3 ; 14 1 : - - . 1 , . I / • z / T 4t9. i •-:- 14 -31j•!•-, /7 [ , _ , #4401 2 •:•:•, , .:.:::., ..:*::::::•. ,,...-..'. :54 t>. . . . . . . •.•.•.•.•. . :::.:. :: :•:**:!:: •:•,..,:.:,....,.., I , , .::::•:::::::::•• — " ."."" , ...N.,:iiss i',.. i,401 0 111 r-1- 1 •• \ 11,4. #4 -......, --- --. 4+ • . • / " , , ..,,1/4. . ,,. • ''f•Fj• C1:1Z1 \\ ‘• / /4-9F scitooL Oil '? R ......... ...... ........... ...... .. ... . j7.77,41-4 .___ F-ARi< ./7" / lot° - 141)AP 1\ / 8061W . , ezwe. ....... ••• ........ ......... 2 cam eTzl:;\ ........ . .. Cilile13r)4.1) .'.*.'.*.'.'.'..' '..'..'.' ••••••••..:". ••".• digidilli°4( ). ' 41 * ... . ....'.*;.';001100.0...... - "• ) ......./,, 4 . • 0 Salatim.15"115M 1 .: L R X WAY MAIIIMEss ..-, ilit "Ifileinaillik I IC- J AMU in 1 .::::•:•:•:•:•.; .• . •. finhA i 1-.....%'•'. . . . . :: i.: :•:i::i::: Diti r • . • .• .• •• :: .::::::: :,••:::.:... • • .• .• •• • .•.. • ••• - • • •" • .. ..::•. )- kiL / • 4ii . ..:•::.:.:: :.• :: •: ••:::: .•:::::•::::•: t4., a ••::::::: ::::::,••.:,:„:„::. 04 . ,,,, ,,,..., c„. :„„„:„,:: .::::::• • „. --- •.•:•::•:::.:• ••::• cie 0 i::::.::::: •. 4 r RED .4. . : : :i: •.• •. SC 5 Nig iTS scE.141G er -41 • : :::•: • ..:. ...:„ 'IN 57.1 ; -wallis4 1) Ifs 1 1- 0 .: ••::•.:• ::: : :. .. :•: 1:. i.:::. Abillil , Skit ..!: • : .: . . . . . . . - Staff Report Fuller Road Business Center April 23, 1997 BACKGROUND This site is guided industrial and zoned I-General. SITE PLAN The site plan shows the construction of a one story, 74,224 square feet building at a base area ratio of.24. The industrial zoning district permits up to a.30 base area ratio. The floor area ratio is .24. The City code permits up to a .50 floor area ratio. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WAIVER: The developer is requesting a waiver from the City code for an increase in allowable office use from 50 to 80%. The reason for the 50% cap is that industrial buildings typically develop at a 30% site coverage which only leaves enough room for parking based on a 50% office use. Since the site coverage is approximately 25% there is more room available for parking. Waivers for office use above the 50% cap have been granted in most of the industrial parks. LANDSCAPING The landscaping requirement is based upon a caliper inch requirement according to building square footage and tree replacement. The caliper inch requirement is 495 inches. The landscape plan meets this requirement. Tree loss is 186 inches of cottonwood trees. The tree replacement requirement is 247 inches. The landscape plan meets this requirement. UTILITIES Sewer and water service is available in Fuller Road. A NURP pond is shown on the site plan for treatment of storm water. ARCHITECTURE The exterior building materials meet City Code. Mechanical equipment is screened parapet wall. 2 lf! Staff Report Fuller Road Business Center April 23, 1997 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff would recommend approval of the PUD Concept Review, PUD District Review, Zoning District Change from I-General to I-2 Industrial,and Site Plan Review based on plans dated April 23, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 23, 1998 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall: A. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the Watershed District. B. Submit detailed storm water runoff,utility and erosion control plans for review by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the proponent shall: A. Pay the appropriate cash park fee. B. Meet with the Fire Marshal to go over fire code requirements. C. Submit samples of exterior building materials for review. D. Submit a landscaping and screening bond for review. 3 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 1998 Page 11 E. FULLER ROAD BUSINESS CENTER by Mount Properties. Request for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.02 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.02 acres, Rezoning from I-General to I-2 on 7.02 acres and Site Plan Review on 7.02 acres. Location: 7905 Fuller road. Bob Soffelt, 10508 Bluff Road,representing Mount Properties,reviewed the project and discussed the building design and materials that will be used. He requested approval of the project. Franzen reviewed the staff report and noted staff recommended approval of the project. The Public Hearing was opened. Dan Swayver,Lincoln Lane, stated he had a safety issue with the retaining wall that goes up to 7-10 feet in height. There are children that play in the area and he felt there should be an adequate barrier put up to prevent anyone from being injured. He also requested that the wildlife area adjacent to the site be left as undisturbed as possible. He was also concerned about the screening between the subject property and the adjacent residential neighborhood. Alexander asked about the lease agreement and Soffelt responded it will be part of the lease agreement that the tenants will be responsible for leaf removal. They will provide some large trees that will be planted on top of the retaining wall which will restrict access to that area. The relocation of the Colorado Blue Spruce could be put along the property line to provide additional screening from the residential homes. Dorn stated the building was beautiful from Highway 212 but he was concerned about the view from Fuller Road. Soffelt stated the Fuller Road view of the building will be floor to ceiling glass and described the materials that will be used in the exterior construction. Swayver commented he and the developers had discussed putting in a fence to provide more buffering between the development and the residential properties if needed. MOTION: Alexander moved, seconded by Clinton, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Alexander moved, seconded by Clinton, to recommend to the City Council approval of the request of Mount Properties for Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 7.02 acres,Planned Unit Development District Review on 7.02 acres,Rezoning from I-General to I-2 Industrial on 7.02 acres and Site Plan Review on 7.02 acres based on plans dated April 15, 1998 and subject to the recommendations of the Staff Report dated April 24, 1998. Motion carried 7-0. Memorandum To: Mike Franzen, City Planner Scott Kipp, Senior Planner From: Stuart A..Fox Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: May 5, 1998 Subject: Summary of the May 5, 1998 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting The following projects were reviewed at the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission on May 5, 1998. The cotes and comments are as follows: • Fuller Road Business Center The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The plan was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission commented that they prefer to replace the cottonwood trees with some like trees. • Charlson, Brown and Standal Properties The project was approved on a 6-0 vote. The proposed development was approved as detailed in the staff reports. The information contained in the supplemental staff report includes the specific information regarding three park issues as follows: 1. To have public/open space designation cross hatched on the salmon colored area of the proposed Guide Plan change. This was recommended earlier and was not shown on this proposed submission. 2. The area adjacent to the Standal property should be designated as public open space 150 feet from the center line of the Riley Creek, 3. Road Connection: The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission recommended the wording that was included in the supplemental staff report. In addition, they felt that an option three should also be considered when the transportation study is done for connecting Spring Road and Eden Prairie Road. This option would be a right in, right out connection from Eden Prairie Road to 212. SAF:mdd Franzen.memo/Stuart98 'y7 Memorandum To: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Mayor and City Council Through: Robert A..Lambert, Director of Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources From: Stuart A. FoxGManager of Parks and Natural Resources Date: Apri128, 1998 Subject: Supplemental Staff Report to the April 23, 1998 Staff Report by the City Planner for Fuller Road Business Center BACKGROUND: The proposed development is located on the south end of Fuller Road on 7.02 acres. The site is currently zoned I-General and requesting to be zoned I-Industrial. NATURAL RESOURCE ISSUES: Tree Loss/Landscaping This site has scattered young box elder and cottonwood trees growing on it. There are 13 trees defined as significant by City Code,totaling 186 diameter inches. The tree loss on this site would be 100% , resulting in mitigation for replacement of 247 caliper inches. In addition, the development is required to have landscaping and screening based on size of the building,height of the building, and association with adjacent properties. The landscaping required to meet the Landscaping Ordinance is 495 caliper inches. The proposed landscape plan meets the requirements for both tree loss and landscaping. The proposed landscaping plan includes a variety of deciduous and coniferous material. The majority of the plant material is being used to screen the proposed building from the adjacent residential property. At the Planning Commission, the developer offered to work with the adjacent property owners to make sure that the placement of these trees would be field located to maximize the screening potential of each tree being planted. NURP Pond The storm water from this site would be collected from the roof drain system, as well as the parking J lot storm water catch basin and channeled to a NUPR pond on the northerly portion of the property. Following sedimentation the runoff from this pond would be piped to the existing storm water system in Fuller Road. Prior to construction of the NURP pond it would need to be reviewed by the City Engineering Department and Watershed District. Buffer Zone There is an existing 50 foot wide buffer zone on the westerly portion of the property. The proposed grading, as well as the installation of a fence and landscape material is being done to protect this buffer zone area. RECOMMENDATION: This project was reviewed at the April 27, 1998 Planning Commission meeting and was approved on a 7-0 vote. The staff would recommend the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission approve the project based on the details of the April 23, 1998 staff report by the City Planner and the additional information contained in this supplement staff report. SAF:mdd Fuller.memo/Stuart98 I PARKS,RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES May 6, 1998 Page 3 B. Figure Skating Club Request Joe Klute reviewed the proposal and noted that they are serving most of the Eden Prairie kids and they are requesting that the resident rate be lowered form 95%to 65%for the Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club. This will give the Eden Prairie Club more ice time and a greater priority in obtaining ice time. Hilgeman asked why 65% and Klute responded that figure was to keep it in line with the swim club and this was agreeable with Mrs.. Munson. Wilson inquired if there was adequate ice available to satisfy both the hockey club and the figure skating club and Klute responded the figure skating club will use most of it's time in the summer as the winter is their slowest time. Stolar commented the hockey association was a Priority 3 and this will make the figure skating club also a Priority 3. He was concerned that the hockey association would complain if they didn't get the ice time. Klute stated the groups work very well together and if there is a conflict they work it out. MOTION: Jacobson moved, seconded by Wilson,to recommend approval to lower the resident rate from 95%to 65% for the Figure Skating Club. Motion carried 6-0. Fox noted the ranking needed to be adjusted to stay in line with other communities and to preserve the balance throughout the City's organizations. V. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS A. Fuller Road Business Center Bob Sofelt, 10508 Bluff road, representing Mount Properties, reviewed the proposal for the Fuller Road Business Center. He stated they are in agreement with the recommendations made by staff and requested approval of the project. Fox reviewed the staff report and noted that staff recommended approval based on the recommendations listed in the staff reports. He noted there has been an offer by the developer to work with the adjacent property owners to improve buffering between their properties and to select the best locations for the trees to provide the best screening possible. Koenig asked about the other four projects that the proponents have developed in Eden Prairie and Sofelt described them and their locations. Wilson asked about the total number of caliper inches that would be on the site and if there will be 247 mitigation caliper inches and 495 caliper inches in the landscape plan. Fox responded that was what was proposed. Hilgeman asked for replacement cottonwood trees in the landscape plan because they were native to Eden Prairie. Fox stated that cottonwoods are in this area because the seeds grow well in disturbed soils and they came from windblown seeds. They are basically a lowland tree and he felt that there was an issue of maintainability and whether this type of tree was suitable in a maintained area. He noted that the roots break up curbs and driveways, and grow through lawns, etc. making them difficult to maintain. He felt there were other trees that were more suitable for these types of areas. I PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES May 6, 1998 Page 4 Stolar asked Wit was worth it to replace these trees to code requirements if there was a chance that many of them would not survive. Fox responded that these trees often become hollow because they are planted too close together but it was a judgement call regarding whether they will provide the screening level desired. Discussion ensued regarding the different types of trees that could be planted in the buffer strip. It was noted that all the trees between the homes and the subject property will be preserved. Hilgeman asked if Sofelt was willing to put in a few cottonwoods and Sofelt responded that their plan was developed by a landscape architect and staff recommendations but if the City required them to plant cottonwoods, they would consider it. MOTION: Stolar moved, seconded by Wilson,to recommend approval of the Fuller Road Business Center based on the details of the April 23, 1998 staff report by the City Planner and the additional information contained in the supplemental Staff Report dated April 28, 1998, with a preference for replacement trees similar to those presently existing on the site. Motion carried 6-0. Brown commented the Commission had required the proponent to meet the tree ordinance and he did not want to tell them what trees to plant where. Stolar commented that the plan was a diverse one, and he thanked the developer for presenting such a good plan. B. Charlson, Brown and Standal Properties Brett Hope introduced Tracy Hope and he gave an overview of the project. He described the proposed roadway configurations and the proposed guiding for each property. He noted there were park issues involving the remainder of the bluff creek corridor and a neighborhood park. These have been addressed within the plans. He offered an alternative to the location of the neighborhood park site in view of MAC acquiring adjacent land. He illustrated the alternative site they propose and discussed the grades in the vicinity. Fox gave the staff report and noted the inclusion of Minutes from previous meetings. The City is still waiting to find out if the City can use any part of the`B" zone for a park. This plan is to allow the City to keep it's options open for the future. This is guiding only and will allow for greater flexibility for future development, but it is not something that is set permanently. He discussed the roadway connections and noted there is a good deal of controversy. No alignment design has been developed and staff recommended that a study be done to determine the best way to get the connection made between Eden Prairie Road and Spring Road. He discussed the trail issues and reiterated that staff wants to keep as many options open as possible. MAC has to submit the Environmental Impact Statement within six months and this will have a large impact on this plan. Hilgeman stated the park site is only 8-9 acres in size and Fox responded it depends on how the adjacent land develops and what the uses are. Jacobson asked about the one mile radius requirement for neighborhood parks and Fox responded that there is a small park behind the Senior Center and staff has identified this area as the last neighborhood park vicinity. Discussion ensued regarding the airport expansion and the safety zone locations. Fox noted that this section of the supplemental staff report was carefully worded to reflect concern regarding the environmental impact of the proposed CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: 2der1 SECTION: Consent Calendar 05/19/98 prairie DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Finance Payment of Claims VI. Checks 62767 to 63296 Wire Transfers 132 to 142 Action/Direction: Approve Payment of Claims 1 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) DIVISION TOTAL LEGISLATIVE $575.10 GENERAL SERVICES $10,994.03 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $13,390.76 FINANCE $1,265.20 HUMAN RESOURCES $6,493.47 INFORMATION $2,171.37 HUMAN SERV $6,250.00 ENGINEERING $1,152.55 INSPECTIONS $3,295.73 FACILITIES $12,683.75 ASSESSING $933.40 CIVIL DEFENSE $4,006.14 POLICE $19,896.11 FIRE $4,116.78 PARK ADMIN $1,972.02 STREETS/TRAFFIC $16,906.24 PARK MAINTENANCE $15,468.99 PARKS CAPITAL OUTLAY $3,686.30 STREET LIGHTING $48,343.50 FLEET SERVICES $12,123.50 ORGANIZED ATHLETICS $5,157.00 COMMUNITY DEV $1,295.43 COMMUNITY CENTER $41,216.45 YOUTH RECREATION $3,271.00 ADULT RECREATION $1,268.70 RECREATION ADMIN $63.06 ADAPTIVE REC $146.93 OAK POINT POOL $344.50 ARTS $2,758.51 PARK FACILITIES $996.74 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $186,665.69 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $333.00 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $228,321.24 CITY CENTER $117,657.61 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $28,391.33 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $49,028.32 PRAIRIEVIEW $56,631.22 CUB FOODS $93,457.07 TRUST FUNDS $24,448.00 WATER DEPT $158,106.87 SEWER DEPT $5,715.34 STORM DRAINAGE $2,318.32 AGENCY FUNDS $1,500.00 EQUIPMENT $189,411.63 $1,384,228.90* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 62767 $625.00 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY SERVICES 62768 $248.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62769 $400.00 APPLEBEES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 62770 $18.79 BRUENING, CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 62771 $3,575.00 HERRICK HARDWOOD FLOORS INC BUILDING CAPITAL OUTLAY-PARK 62772 $54.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFET BIKE REGISTRATIONS FD 10 ORG 62773 $112.75 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPT POSTAGE GENERAL 62774 $158.76 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING & UNIFORMS INSPECTION-ADMIN 62775 $78.00 UNL CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVE CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 62776 $969.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62777 $2,384.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62778 $3,960.45 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62780 $618.39 WINE COMPANY, THE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62781 $728.20 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62782 $1,710.45 EAGLE WINE COMPANY TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62784 $11,437.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62785 $226.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62786 $8,524.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62788 $7,779.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62790 $415.20 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62791 $2,659.73 PRIOR WINE COMPANY TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62792 $3,900.57 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO DISCOUNTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62794 $292.08 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 62795 $5.00 AMES, BEVERLY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62796 $7.75 CHEN, FU-GIN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62797 $100.00 COLE, KIMBERLY ROSE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE SHOW 62798 $19.00 DUNSMORE, WES LICENSES & TAXES PARK MAINTENANCE 62799 $37.00 ENGER, CHRIS TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 62800 $29,504.00 ERICKSON CHEVROLET PONTIAC INC AUTOS GENERAL GOVT 62801 $48.00 ERICSON, CYNTHIA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62802 $10.00 HAGGERTY, BETTY JO ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62803 $5.00 HEILING, SHARON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62804 $5,233.00 JASON-NORTHCO L.P. #1 REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62805 $55.85 KUCERA, TERRY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 62806 $26.39 MEYER, NICOLE SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 62807 $26.00 MUSTON, RUBECCA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62808 $80.06 NIELSON, RANDY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE SHOW 62809 $31,099.94 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC STORMWATER LIFTSTATION 62812 $26.00 OFTELIE, SUSAN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62813 $55.00 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH AND CHANGE FUND FD 10 ORG 62814 $29.00 ROSS, CHUCK LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62815 $20.00 RUDIN, TERRY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62816 $28.00 SCHURLE, LOUISE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62817 $201.00 SPORTS WORLD USA INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE ARENA 62818 $25.00 TRIVEDI, ANU ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62819 $225.42 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62820 $5,613.40 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 62821 $25.00 ZETTEL, BARBARA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62822 $3,264.15 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62823 $6,562.20 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62824 $214.41 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62825 $137.15 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62826 $4,720.57 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62827 $804.01 PRIOR WINE COMPANY TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62828 $66.50 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 l3 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 62829 $3,945.35 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62830 $555.00 APCO INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 62831 $500.00 ARNESON, GERALD HOPE LOAN RECEIVABLE HOPE LOAN PROGRAM 62832 $1,200.00 ARP, ROBERT A IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS $259586.07 20YRS 8.5W 62833 $310.85 MENARDS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 62834 $523.47 MINNESOTA VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRIC STORMWATER LIFTSTATION 62835 $44.85 MOREHOUSE, KEITH MILEAGE AND PARKING EPCC MAINTENANCE 62836 $836.85 RIESGAF, ROBERT ACCTS REC-CUSTOMER WATER DEPT 62837 $314.95 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL 62838 $532.95 BELLBOY CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62839 $2,644.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62840 $1,350.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62841 $218.00 GRAND PERE WINES INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62842 $6,855.02 GRIGGS COOPER & CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62843 $6,122.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62844 $2,061.20 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62845 $381.00 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62846 $2,734.61 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62848 $282.93 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62849 $1,814.75 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62850 $885.41 VINIFERA MINNESOTA WINE IMPORTED PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62851 $430.70 APPLIANCE OUTLET CENTER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 1996 REHABILITATION 62852 $1,118.25 ATLAS FOUNDATION CO EQUIPMENT RENTAL TREE REMOVAL 62853 $14.54 BARLI, ROBERT MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 62854 $55.95 CALIBRE PRESS INC TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 62855 $214.12 CARLTON CO HUMAN SERVICES CTR GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 62856 $562.86 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 62857 $1,478.48 GCO CARPET OUTLET OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 1996 REHABILITATION 62858 $905.46 HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT AND GARNISHMENT WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 62859 $23.08 HOEFT, JULIE MILEAGE AND PARKING AQUATICS & FITNESS SUPERV 62860 $89.05 LANENBERG, CYNTHIA MILEAGE AND PARKING FIRE 62861 $75.00 LECC CONFERENCE POLICE 62862 $72.14 METRO SALES INCORPORATED* OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 62863 $1,106.52 MINNESOTA, STATE OF TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 62864 $175.00 PARTNERS IN TRAINING CONSULTAN SCHOOLS POLICE 62865 $91.68 PETTY CASH CASH OVER/SHORT FINANCE DEPT 62867 $11,828.40 RICHFIELD, CITY OF AUTOS STORM DRAINAGE 62868 $141,611.00 SUPERIOR FORD AUTOS P/S REVOLVING FD 62869 $52.00 THOMPSON, MARY BETH LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 62870 $35.10 ABEL, KRISTIN MILEAGE AND PARKING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 62871 $36.00 AKHTAR, MOIZ LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 62872 $58.00 BETTS, LINETTE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62873 $18.75 BLUHM, GERALYN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62874 $200.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 62875 $17.00 GALLAGHER, SHERYL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62876 $28.00 GARDNER, KEN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62877 $7,218.85 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 62878 $54.00 HANSON, PENNY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 62879 $26,398.53 HEALTHPARTNERS COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 62880 $30.00 HEBELER, MARTY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62881 $48.00 HOWG, VI LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 62882 $5,688.86 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 62883 $1,422.00 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATI UNION DUES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 62884 $28.00 JORISSEN, TOM ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62885 $30.00 KEENAN, BRENDAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP LI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 62886 $29.00 KERBER, KRISTEN LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 62887 $684.16 KINKOS INC PRINTING PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 62888 $28.00 LASLEY, CHRISTINE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62889 $7.50 LASLEY, MARLYN SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62890 $21.75 LIEDTKE, LAURA LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62891 $7.50 LUNDGREN, AUDREY SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62892 $75.00 MAAO CONFERENCES ATTN P KNUTSO CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 62893 $30.00 MARZA, JOSE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62894 $9,262.74 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSU REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62895 $68,521.25 MEDICA CHOICE COBRA COSTS/REV BENEFITS 62896 $4,127.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 62897 $1,205.00 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 62898 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 62899 $58.00 MORGAN, SHARON LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62900 $74.04 MUNSON, BOB OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE SHOW 62901 $26.00 NOVAK, JOAN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62902 $26.00 OLSON, JOAN LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62903 $18.25 PARR, DOUG LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62904 $7.75 PARR, JEANEATTE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62905 $51,130.94 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT EMPLOYERS PERA FD 10 ORG 62906 $285.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PERA LIFE INSURANCE FD 10 ORG 62907 $35.00 RAUD, LINDA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 62908 $28.00 RENNEKE, NANCY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62909 $26.00 SCHMIDT, ANNE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62910 $27.00 SMITH, JULIE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62911 $75.00 SUFFICIENT SYSTEMS INC CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 62912 $30.00 THUL, JEANETTE LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 62913 $21.25 TOUMEY, JANE LESSONS/CLASSES OAK POINT LESSONS 62914 $192.70 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 62915 $46.00 VAASSEN, ROSETTA SCHOOLS FITNESS CLASSES 62916 $69.72 WERTS, SANDY MILEAGE AND PARKING REC SUPERVISOR 62917 $67.85 WILSON, TAMARA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 62918 $4,613.97 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62920 $194.75 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62921 $2,619.71 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY DISCOUNTS PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62923 $5,781.73 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62924 $152.00 AARP 55 ALIVE MATURE DRIVING SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62925 $42.00 ADAMS, SALLY LESSONS/CLASSES ICE ARENA 62926 $441.84 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE FURNITURE & FIXTURES INSPECTION-ADMIN 62927 $444.98 BINGHAM, SALLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 1996 REHABILITATION 62928 $165.43 CORDES, JEFFREY MILEAGE AND PARKING TREE DISEASE 62929 $68.71 CROWN MARKING INC OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 62930 $36.67 DAVIDSON, CRAIG ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 62931 $52.33 KRESS, CARLA MILEAGE AND PARKING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 62932 $36.63 KUNG, WAN-CHONG LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 62933 $24.00 PROP OTHER REVENUE FD 10 ORG 62934 $602.65 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING COMPAN BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62935 $707.61 EAGLE WINE COMPANY TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62936 $4,866.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62937 $572.47 GRAPE BEGINNINGS TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62938 $11,017.90 GRIGGS COOPER & CO TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 62939 $3,090.41 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62941 $141.80 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY DISCOUNTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62942 $3,545.78 PRIOR WINE COMPANY TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62944 $7,082.15 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO DISCOUNTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 62946 $244.05 WINE COMPANY, THE DISCOUNTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62947 $10.00 ANDERSON, LOUELLA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62948 $10.00 BERKLAND, ELDON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62949 $25.00 BLEAK, CLARA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62950 $750.00 CHRISTENSON, ROBERT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ARTS 62951 $10.00 CHURCHILL, MARK ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62952 $25.00 DEWEY, DON ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62953 $500.00 EDEN PRAIRIE HOCKEY ASSOCIATIO FACILITIES RENTAL ICE ARENA 62954 $160.00 GE CAPITAL FLEET SERVICES FACILITIES RENTAL OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62955 $84.46 GLENROSE FLORAL AND GIFT SHOPS EMPLOYEE AWARD HUMAN RESOURCES 62956 $10.00 GRIZZELL, DEBORAH ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62957 $10.00 HOHERTZ, RICHARD ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62958 $20.00 JANZEN, ROBIN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62959 $6.50 LUNDGREN, AUDREY SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62960 $20.00 MOSMAN, JAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62961 $25.00 O'HARA, JAMES ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62962 $10.00 POLYCARPOU, ANDREAS ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62963 $213.68 RICHARDSON, JIM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 62964 $180.00 S & W PLASTICS/JIM MUNSELL STARING LAKE BUILDING RENTAL PARK FACILITIES 62965 $7.50 SUDBECK, MACRINA SR CITIZENS/ADULT PROG FEES SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM 62966 $20.00 WALLACE, JANE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62967 $20.00 YOSHITANI, LAURA ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG OUTDOOR CTR PROGRAM 62968 $105.00 MAGC TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 62969 $262.04 OPTIMIST CLUB OF EDEN PRAIRIE SPECIAL EVENTS FEES SPECIAL EVENTS/TRIPS 62970 $3,103.70 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62971 $5,309.80 GRIGGS COOPER & CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62972 $2,064.01 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO TRANSPORTATION PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62973 $6,249.73 MARK VII BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62974 $86.50 PAUSTIS & SONS COMPANY DISCOUNTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62975 $2,773.97 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC WINE DOMESTIC PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62978 $176.99 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO DISCOUNTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62979 $4,701.70 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 62980 $476.14 WORLD CLASS WINES INC DISCOUNTS PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 62981 $1,145.41 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 62982 $20.00 AWMA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 62983 $48.00 BCA CJIS ID UNIT PHYSICAL & PSYCO EXAM HUMAN RESOURCES 62984 $17.75 CUB FOODS EDEN PRAIRIE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 62985 $536.75 GE CAPITAL RENTALS GENERAL 62986 $1,984.94 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 62991 $1,036.25 HELLING, LAURIE SCHOOLS IN SERVICE TRAINING 62992 $8.99 HUTTER, MICHAEL MISCELLANEOUS RECREATION ADMIN 62993 $50.00 IAAI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 62994 $66.15 JOHNSON, BRUCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BENEFITS 62995 $15,690.52 MINNEGASCO GAS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 62997 $20.00 MRPA CONFERENCE IN SERVICE TRAINING 62998 $450.00 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS IN SERVICE TRAINING 62999 $24.68 PETTY CASH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND 63000 $21.00 SHIREK, SANDRA LESSONS/CLASSES POOL LESSONS 63001 $47.08 STOVRING, LESLIE MILEAGE AND PARKING ENGINEERING DEPT 63002 $275.00 TWIN CITY AREA LABOR MGMT COUN TRAVEL IN SERVICE TRAINING 63003 $1,360.70 BELLBOY CORPORATION TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 63005 $1,449.95 DAY DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63006 $1,183.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63007 $100.67 GRAND PERE WINES INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63008 $103.98 GRAPE BEGINNINGS TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 63009 $134.40 JORDAN BEVERAGE INC BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 63010 $109.95 MARK VII BEER 6/12 LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63011 $257.95 MIDWEST COCA COLA BOTTLING COM MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63012 $205.90 PEPSI COLA COMPANY MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE CONCESSIONS 63013 $246.99 QUALITY WINE & SPIRTS CO DISCOUNTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63014 $914.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING BEER 6/12 PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 63015 $97.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC TRANSPORTATION LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63016 $731.01 WORLD CLASS WINES INC DISCOUNTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63017 $46.50 AMOCO OIL COMPANY MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63018 $60.00 ANDERSON, JAN ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 63019 $12.00 CADWALLADER, BLAKE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63020 $824.34 CHANHASSEN BUMPER TO BUMPER EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63022 $91,017.45 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER LICENSES & TAXES DOUGT•AR/MORE HOUSE 63023 $12.00 JOHNSON, DEB ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63024 $120.00 LUNDBERG, TED ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SUMMER SKILL DEVELOP 63025 $12.00 MELLSTROM, DAVID ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63026 $28.00 MITCHELL, VICKI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63027 $12.00 MJOEN, MICHAEL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63028 $60.00 MORENO, PAUL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63029 $30.00 MYERS, TERRIE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63030 $472.10 PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS PHOTO SUPPLIES COMMUNITY SERVICES 63033 $12.00 RAY, WENDY ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63034 $12.00 SCHAFFER, MARJORIE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63035 $12.00 SEIDENSTRICKER, MARIANNE ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63036 $26.00 SEIFERT, PATRICIA & VIRGIL ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63037 $12.00 TOMLINSON, TERRI ADULT/YOUTH/OUTDOOR CTR PROG SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63038 $14.24 W W GRAINGER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1 63039 $979.80 20TH CENTURY PLASTICS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL INSPECTION-ADMIN 63040 $74.56 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 63041 $1,093.92 ACHIEVEMENT CENTER, THE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL STREET MAINTENANCE 63042 $112.74 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT FIRE STATION #2 63043 $487.50 ALAN SHILEPSKY CONSULTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63044 $39.95 ALEX AUDIO & VIDEO SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL FIRE 63045 $2,532.82 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE FURNITURE & FIXTURES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 63046 $1,102.80 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATI TRAINING SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63047 $339.19 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 63048 $323.00 AQUA CITY PLUMBING AND HEATING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 63049 $12.70 AQUA ENGINEERING INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 63050 $662.41 AUDIOVISUAL INC VIDEO SUPPLIES COMMUNITY SERVICES 63051 $693.85 B & S TOOLS SMALL TOOLS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63052 $700.00 BABCOCK, LTD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB SITE 63053 $268.21 BAUER BUILT TIRE AND BATTERY TIRES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63054 $898.80 BEACON BALLFIELDS-DIV LODESTAR OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 63055 $150.96 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 63056 $309.00 BETH AND MORLEY BURNETT REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 63057 $185.00 BINGHAM, SALLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 1996 REHABILITATION 63058 $452.27 BLOOMINGTON LOCK AND SAFE* EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63059 $1,972.02 BORDNER AERIALS OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARKS-PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 63060 $893.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING FLYING CLOUD SANITARY SEWER 63061 $338.67 BROADWAY AWARDS AWARDS RACQUETBALL 63062 $29.91 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 63063 $72.14 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC GRAVEL STREET MAINTENANCE 63064 $904.00 BUCK, NATHAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63065 $308.35 BUSINESS & INSTITUTIONAL FURNI STATION IMPROVEMENTS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63066 $162.70 BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS INC SAFETY SUPPLIES SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 1 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 63067 $24,100.00 CAIRNS & BROTHER INC FIRE PORTABLE EQUIP FIRE FIGHTERS 63068 $25.00 CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 63069 $395.00 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STREET MAINTENANCE 63070 $100.27 CATCO CLUTCH & TRANSMISSION SE CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63071 $390.00 CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT RESEARCH OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 63072 $135.00 CENTRES GROUP LTD POSTAGE GENERAL 63073 $69.00 CITY BUSINESS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63074 $74.32 COLOR CENTER, THE BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63075 $15.00 COMPUTER CHEQUE OF MINNESOTA I OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63076 $301.68 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS TRAINING SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 63077 $42.40 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS COMPANY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63078 $84.14 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 63079 $2,340.09 COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOC OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL 63080 $81.17 COPY EQUIPMENT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 63081 $39.40 CULLIGAN WATER WATER SOFTNER OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 63082 $9,805.74 CUTLER-MAGNER COMPANY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63083 $591.77 D J'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNS 63084 $105.44 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL STREET MAINTENANCE 63085 $1,120.59 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE 63086 $692.94 DARTNELL CORPORATION, THE TRAINING SUPPLIES SEWER UTILITY-GENERAL 63087 $40.00 DC VENDING OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63088 $33.29 DELEGARD TOOL CO SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63089 $34,846.89 DON RIHN TRANSPORT OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES LIME SLUDGE 63090 $3,828.02 DPC INDUSTRIES INC CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63091 $250.00 DUKES SALES & SERVICE INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63092 $838.77 DYNA SYSTEMS REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63093 $1,881.28 EARL F ANDERSEN INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAY-PARK 63094 $21.30 EDEN PRAIRIE CLEANERS-REGAL CL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 63095 $290.00 EDINA, CITY OF CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER SYSTEM SAMPLE 63096 $165.00 EKLUNDS TREE AND BRUSH DISPOSA WASTE DISPOSAL TREE REMOVAL 63097 $1,544.11 ELEC-TROL INC EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63098 $529.20 ELECTRIC SYSTEMS OF ANOKA CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CIVIL DEFENSE 63099 $25.34 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY INC PROTECTIVE CLOTHING WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63100 $190.80 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT FIRE 63101 $2,698.00 ERICKSEN ELLISON AND ASSOCIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC 63102 $153.36 FASTSIGNS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POLICE 63103 $259.90 FERRELLGAS MOTOR FUELS ICE ARENA 63104 $398.99 FIBRCOM COMMUNICATIONS POLICE 63105 $17,700.00 FINLEY BROS INC PARK EQUIPMENT FLYING CLOUD FIELDS K15 63106 $125.99 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 63107 $645.31 FOR PAINTS SAKE OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL 1996 REHABILITATION 63108 $479.66 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TREE DISEASE 63109 $349.97 G & K SERVICES DIRECT PURCHASE CLOTHING & UNIFORMS GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 63110 $459.84 G & K SERVICES-MPLS INDUSTRIAL CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63111 $45.00 GALAXY COMPUTER SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT ASSESSING-ADMIN 63112 $195.84 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG IN REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES ICE ARENA 63113 $250.00 GASBOY INTERNATIONAL INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63114 $70.00 GATES, KATHY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 63115 $5,570.49 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPAN OFFICE SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63116 $161.80 GETTMAN COMPANY MISC TAXABLE LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63117 $114.81 GLIDDEN COMPANY BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63118 $78.75 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63119 $1,417.44 GRAFIX SHOPPE NEW CAR EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63120 $921.01 GREATER MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPT REC EQUIP & SUPPLIES POOL LESSONS 63121 $285.00 GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN WASTE DISPOSAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 63122 $96.06 HALDEMANN HOMME INC PRINTING ASSESSING-ADMIN 63123 $80.00 HAMILTON, MICHAEL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63124 $51.76 HANCE COMPANIES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63125 $3,087.60 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63126 $299.00 HENDERSON, JOSH OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADULT OPEN GYM 63127 $712.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S ACCO BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 63128 $635.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 63129 $4,999.47 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER R&B BOARD OF PRISONERS SVC POLICE 63130 $269.13 HENNEPIN COUNTY WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE 63131 $349.21 HERC U LIFT EQUIPMENT RENTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 63132 $666.00 HIGLEY, STEVE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63133 $849.50 HOLMES, JOHN CARTER OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63134 $253.00 HOLMES, TOM OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63135 $2,080.00 HONEYWELL INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63136 $605.92 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS* OFFICE EQUIP MAINT WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63137 $275.00 INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63138 $261.51 J&R RADIATOR CORP CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63139 $65.00 JACK D ELMQUIST LAW OFFICES LEGAL SERVICE MARKETCENTER STREETSCAPE 63140 $1,111.97 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC COMPUTERS ENGINEERING DEPT 63141 $1,075.59 JANEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES EPCC MAINTENANCE 63142 $346.12 JB LAWN LANDSCAPING & SNOWPLOW OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES CEMETERY OPERATION 63143 $848.47 JIM HATCH SALES CO SAFETY SUPPLIES SEWER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63144 $29.51 KENDALL/HUNT PUBLISHING COMPAN OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PROGRAM SUPERVISOR 63145 $345.48 KNOX BUILDING MATERIALS BLDG REPAIR & MAINT STARING LAKE 63146 $929.69 KOCH SULFER PRODUCTS CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63147 $43.87 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63148 $98.80 LAGERQUIST CORP CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63149 $3,260.97 LAKE REGION VENDING TOBACCO PRODUCTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63150 $14.42 LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63151 $173.95 LAND'S END CORPORATE SALES CLOTHING & UNIFORMS POLICE 63152 $928.55 LANG PAULY GREGERSON AND ROSOW LEGAL SERVICE TEMAN PROPERTY 63153 $319.50 LANO EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT RENTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 63154 $620.00 LEONARD J KOEHNEN & ASSOC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 63155 $95.00 LERN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNITY BROCHURE 63156 $38.34 LESCO INC CHEMICALS STREET MAINTENANCE 63157 $1,158.72 LINE X EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63158 $501.20 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63159 $101.10 LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY BUILDING MATERIALS OUTDOOR CENTER-STARING LAKE 63160 $15.00 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC MISC TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 63161 $49.50 MAGELSSEN, MUFF CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SR CTR OPERATIONS 63162 $346.42 MAIL BOXES ETC POSTAGE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63163 $307.47 MARS CO MACHINERY EQUIPMENT WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63164 $1,840.32 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO CONTRACTED BLDG MAINT EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 63165 $553.00 MARSHALL & SWIFT OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ASSESSING-ADMIN 63166 $1,429.70 MASYS CORPORATION CONTRACTED COMM MAINT POLICE 63167 $1,056.48 MAXI-PRINT INC PRINTING POLICE 63168 $154.00 MCGREGOR, RANDY OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63169 $250.00 MEALS ON WHEELS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 63170 $275.00 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS SPECIAL EVENTS FEES ADULT PROGRAM 63171 $143.50 METRO EROSION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT STORM DRAINAGE 63172 $40.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES 1996 REHABILITATION 63173 $580.31 METROPOLITAN FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63174 $1,362.01 MID AMERICA PLASTICS INC BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63175 $276.20 MIDAS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63176 $6,115.76 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION WASTE BLACKTOP/CONCRETE STREET MAINTENANCE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 63177 $72.87 MINNCOMM PAGING COMMUNICATIONS WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63178 $23.30 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS PRINTING POLICE 63179 $80.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63180 $46.00 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH LICENSES & TAXES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63181 $958.50 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMENT* EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63182 $26,054.61 MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOD SERVICE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES EP CITY CTR OPERATING COSTS 63184 $1,426.40 MITY-LITE INC OTHER EQUIPMENT SENIOR CENTER 63185 $116.48 MOORE MEDICAL CORP SAFETY SUPPLIES FIRE 63186 $9,956.97 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO MACHINERY EQUIPMENT P/R REVOLVING FD 63187 $26.00 MUSIC THEATRE INTERNATIONAL OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER THEATRE 63188 $4,900.53 NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 63189 $1,935.40 NELSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CIVIL DEFENSE 63190 $37.00 NEUMANN, NEAL OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63191 $232.00 NORLAB INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63192 $734.13 NORTH STAR ICE MISC TAXABLE PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 63193 $241.42 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63194 $723.55 OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS SOFTWARE ARTS 63195 $323.76 OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENTS INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE 63196 $54.07 PAPER DIRECT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL RECREATION ADMIN 63197 $23.38 PARAGON CABLE CABLE TV COMMUNITY SERVICES 63198 $666.00 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HEALTHSYS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 63199 $1,640.50 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63200 $102.21 PETSMART CANINE SUPPLIES POLICE 63201 $206.94 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING RIVERVIEW HGTS 63202 $1,134.86 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL INC LANDSCAPE MTLS & AG SUPPL PARK MAINTENANCE 63203 $285.00 PRESS EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE 63204 $1,175.19 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED EQUIP REPAIR SEWER LIFTSTATION 63205 $641.72 QUALITY WASTE CONTROL INC WASTE DISPOSAL EPCC MAINTENANCE 63206 $51.20 QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER POSTAGE GENERAL 63207 $156.85 R S MEANS COMPANY INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL GENERAL BUILDING FACILITIES 63208 $13.83 RADIO SHACK CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT POLICE 63209 $105.00 RAINBOW RACING SYSTEM INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL POOL SPECIAL EVENTS 63210 $1,147.50 RAY, LEE OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SOFTBALL 63211 $198.51 RC IDENTIFICATIONS INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 63212 $1,191.25 RDO EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63213 $575.10 REAL GEM AWARDS COUNCIL 63214 $593.47 RESPOND SYSTEMS SAFETY SUPPLIES STREET MAINTENANCE 63215 $3,314.28 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATE DESIGN & CONST Birch Island Watermain Design 63216 $228.90 RITZ CAMERA OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TREE DISEASE 63217 $83.15 ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63218 $335.90 ROGERS SERVICE CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63219 $255.00 ROOT 0 MATIC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES RILEY LAKE 63220 $75.65 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63221 $12.89 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC CLEANING SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63222 $1,114.48 SEELYE PLASTICS INC BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63223 $4,125.00 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 63224 $756.45 SERCO LABORATORIES CONST TESTING-SOIL BORING WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63225 $595.00 SIT, ERIC INSTRUCTOR SERVICE SPRING SKILL DEVELOP 63226 $509.91 SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63227 $787.17 SOUTHWEST CONTRACTORS SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 63228 $1,154.11 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING GENERAL 63229 $492.80 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN PUBLISHING- EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING HUMAN RESOURCES 63230 $212.56 SPS COMPANIES EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63231 $17,507.00 STAIRMASTER SPORTS/MEDICAL PRO OTHER EQUIPMENT CC CAPITAL OUTLAY 63232 $13.14 STAR TRIBUNE MISC NON-TAXABLE PRAIRE VIEW LIQUOR #3 I0 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 63233 $39.36 STEMPF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES I EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63234 $12.25 STEVE LUCAS PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO SUPPLIES POLICE 63235 $146.97 STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 63236 $1,875.00 STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING, TRANS, & SOC SVC 63237 $201.29 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC BLDG REPAIR & MAINT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63238 $315.00 STRASBURG, JOAN OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES ADULT OPEN GYM 63239 $6,118.38 STREICHERS TRAINING SUPPLIES POLICE 63240 $31.57 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT GENERAL 63241 $207.71 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET GEO EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63242 $12.59 SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63243 $367.16 SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO SERVICE I EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63244 $140.00 SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63245 $26.61 TARGET OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL SUMMER SAFETY CAMP 63246 $2,168.16 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORPO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES SEWER LIFTSTATION 63247 $200.00 TIE COMMUNICATIONS INC TELEPHONE GENERAL 63248 $1,163.68 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC BUILDING MATERIALS RILEY LAKE 63249 $24,448.00 TOM DIETHELM BUILDERS BUILDING HISTORICAL CULTURE 63250 $2.70 TRANS UNION CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE 63251 $134,000.86 TRANSPORTATION, COMMISSIONER 0 IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS TH212/PCD Interchange Stage 1 63252 $34,681.16 TRAUT WELLS CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT WATER WELL #7 63253 $91.61 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 63254 $574.57 TWIN CITY SEED CO IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS TRAILS 63255 $1,251.74 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING & UNIFORMS FIRE 63256 $22,230.00 UNITED STATE MECHANICAL INC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS COMMUNITY CENTER FILTRATION 63257 $146.55 UNLIMITED SUPPLIES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63258 $1,062.40 URBAN COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ICE SHOW 63259 $333.00 US BANK PAYING AGENT PRINCIPAL & INTEREST 63260 $11,853.85 US FILTER/WATERPRO EQUIPMENT PARTS WATER METER REPAIR 63261 $290.00 US POSTMASTER - HOPKINS POSTAGE WATER UTILITY-GENERAL 63262 $1,453.76 US PREMISE NETWORKING SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIR & MAINT CIVIL DEFENSE 63263 $1,908.52 VIDEOTRONIX INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES COMMUNITY CENTER ADMIN 63264 $472.12 VWR SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63265 $817.12 W W GRAINGER INC OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63266 $5,149.91 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO MACHINERY EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63267 $106.52 WASTE MANAGEMENT - BLAINE WASTE DISPOSAL PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 63268 $42.94 WAYTEK INC OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE 63269 $150.00 WEATHER WATCH INC OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES SNOW & ICE CONTROL 63270 $445.05 WESTWELD EQUIPMENT PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 63271 $549.40 WM MUELLER AND SONS INC PATCHING ASPHALT STREET MAINTENANCE 63272 $999.79 X-ERGON REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT PLANT 63273 $432.00 ZAHN, GERALD OTHER CONTRACTED SERVICES VOLLEYBALL 63274 $100.00 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MPLS BOND DEDUCTION FD 10 ORG 63275 $244.00 FEDEX POSTAGE GENERAL 63276 $7,248.85 GREAT WEST LIFE AND ANNUITY DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 63277 $5,628.86 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 63278 $4,222.50 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 63279 $520.00 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG LICENSES & TAXES WATER WELL #6 63280 $1,205.00 MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYS DEFERRED COMP FD 10 ORG 63281 $40.00 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS CREDIT UNI CREDIT UNION FD 10 ORG 63282 $68,583.00 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRIC STORMWATER LIFTSTATION 63284 $213.00 PRECISION TUNE HOPE LOAN RECEIVABLE hope auto repair 63285 $20.00 PROPSON, BRIAN VIOLATION FEES BASKETBALL 63286 $51,536.77 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT EMPLOYERS PERA FD 10 ORG 63287 $110.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS EMPLOYERS PERA FD 10 ORG 63288 $192.70 UNITED WAY UNITED WAY WITHHELD FD 10 ORG b I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:43) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 63289 $7,044.96 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SEWER LIFTSTATION 63291 $35.00 DOMINOS OPERATING SUPPLIES-GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION 63292 $6,235.54 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO WINE DOMESTIC LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS 63295 $3,080.84 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRTS INC TRANSPORTATION PRAIRIE VILLAGE LIQUOR #1 63296 $208.05 WINE COMPANY, THE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR STORE CUB FOODS $1,384,228.90* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 13-MAY-1998 (09:52) DIVISION TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES $2.00 DATA PROCESSING -$184.73 HUMAN RESOURCES $22.83 FACILITIES $32.13 POLICE $7.46 FIRE $51.68 STREETS/TRAFFIC $44.75 PARK MAINTENANCE $95.49 FLEET SERVICES $680.38 COMMUNITY CENTER $1,807.52 BEACHES $3.54 YOUTH RECREATION $227.71 SPECIAL EVENTS $9.42 OAK POINT POOL $302.94 ARTS $5.33 PARK FACILITIES $162.02 PUBLIC IMPROV PROJ $137,164.33 DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $2,887.50 EMPLOYEE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS $255,986.76 CITY CENTER $35.97 PRAIRIE VILLAGE $8,690.07 PRAIRIEVIEW $10,313.19 CUB FOODS $17,684.89 WATER DEPT $2,126.57 SEWER DEPT $3.61 $438,163.36* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13-MAY-1998 (09:52) CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION PROGRAM 135 $105,526.85 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A FEDERAL TAXES W/H FD 10 ORG 136 $54,281.34 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYEES SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG 137 $54,281.34 NORWEST BANKS MINNESOTA N A EMPLOYERS SS & MEDICARE FD 10 ORG 138 $41,896.89 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE STATE TAXES WITHHELD FD 10 ORG 139 $398.80 MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE MOTOR FUELS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 140 $42,226.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENU SALES TAX PAYABLE FD 10 ORG 141 $136,664.64 KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS 10 MGD WATER PLANT EXPANSION 142 $2,887.50 NORWEST BANK MN N.A. INTEREST B & I PAYMENTS $438,163.36* ILj CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Date: Section: Boards &Commissions -Environmental&Waste Management May 19, 1998 Commission Department: Item Description: Item No.: Public Works Budget Outline for Surcharge Monies Leslie Stovring Requested Action Review and approve the budget proposed by the Environmental and Waste Management Commission (EWMC) for the$50,000 set aside for environmental programs. Background On March 17, 1998 the City Council approved that a portion of the surcharge monies collected be used for Educational Programs, such as: • Educational seminars on landscaping or water conservation • Grant programs for environmental students at the high school or graduate level • Purchase of education-related supplies,including for the Environmental Learning Center. • Establishment of a rebate program for xeriscape landscaping and/or water-saving appliances. • Implementation of a program to contact residents with a surcharge greater than$100 for City inspections of their water system and/or distribution of water conservation related educational materials. The EWMC has established a proposed budget to fit these proposed needs. They are summarized in the following chart. Proposed Budget ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Environmental One scholarship will be awarded to a High School student who $750 Scholarship demonstrates active participation in environmental issues in the Community or indicates strong interest in pursuing an environmentally- related career. Summer Camp Two scholarships will be awarded to grade school or middle school $500 Scholarship students to attend an environmentally-related summer camp program, such as the YMCA. Income and interest in environmental programs will be used as the basis for awarding the scholarships. Environmental A grant will be awarded to the High School River's Project for collection $1,500 Grant and analysis of data from the ponds and wetland being constructed at the Water Plant. An ongoing monitoring program for water chemistry and vegetation analysis will developed. Conservation Surcharge Budget May 19, 1998 Educational EWMC would work with a local video producer to prepare a semi- $3,500 Video professional video illustrating use of fertilizers, explanation of our watering restrictions, benefits of buffer strips and xeriscape or native plant gardening techniques, the storm sewer system and it's connection to our water resources and sprinkler systems and how to improve their efficiency. Paragon Cable equipment will be used and volunteer speakers and assistance will be sought to reduce costs. The video will be approximately 15 minutes long and will be run on Paragon Cable and the Environmental Learning Center. The video will be made available for use by private and commercial residents. Environmental An undergraduate or graduate level student would be hired as an intern $13,500 Intern for 1998/99 to assist with environmental programs within the City. The main focus of the 1998/99 work plan would include collection and analysis of data for the Groundwater Protection Plan. The intern could also assist with organizing environmentally-related events, such as the 1999 Environmental Fair. Appliance Monies will be used for rebating residents for purchase of water- $10,000 Rebate conserving appliances, such as toilets or washing machine, to replace Program existing appliances. The program would be structured to provide a$100 rebate to the first 100 applicants. Environmental Informational brochures relating to water conservation and leak detection $3,000 Information will be purchased for distribution to homeowners who have water bills Distribution in excess of$100. Additional brochures or other materials, such as stickers or coloring books,will be purchased to distribute at events such as the Spring Cleanup or Environmental Fair. Bill inserts will also be developed relating to environmental education such as fertilization, watering restrictions or non-point pollution sources at home. Environmental Additional equipment is required for the Environmental Learning Center $15,000 Learning to provide an audio-visual experience for visitors. Eden Prairie students Center are also creating videos for use at the Center as part of their Rivers Equipment Program. Equipment needed at this time includes 3 computers, 4 VCRs and 4 monitors capable of operating with both computers and VCRs. Environmental Software programs for use at the Environmental Learning Center will be $2,250 Software purchased or developed in conjunction with an organization like the Science Museum. The software will address topics such as recycling, storm water or landscaping alternatives. TOTAL $50,000 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SECTION: Report of City Manager 5/19/98 DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Administration Revised Council Workshop List XI.B.1 Requested Action: Motion to approve the Revised Council Workshop list dated May 19, 1998. Background Information: Each time a change in made in the Council Workshop list it is necessary to approve the list with revisions. Form c\hr\council\agn-form.wpd Rev 12/4/95 SCHEDULED 1998 TOPICS/DATES FOR WORKSHOPS FOR COUNCILMEMBERS (Revised May 19, 1998) Date Topic Time April 28 (cancelled) Council Workshop/ 7:00 - 9:00 PM Transition Issues May 5 Water Plant Tour 6:00 - 7:15 PM (Food at 5:30 PM at the Water Plant) May 19 Council Workshop/Preliminary 5:00 - 6:30 PM 1999 Budget Discussion June 2 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM June 16 Council WorkshopNision 5:00 - 6:30 PM 2001 Update July 7 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM July 21 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM August 4 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM August 18 Council Workshop/2nd Budget 5:00 - 6:30 PM Discussion September 1 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM September 15 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM October 6 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM October 20 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM November 3 Election Day - No Workshop Council meeting to begin at 8 PM November 17 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM - 2 - December 1 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM December 15 Council Workshop 5:00 - 6:30 PM Note: Dinner at 6:30 PM in Garden Room for all meetings starting at 5:00 PM CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: May 19, 1998 SECTION: Report of City Manager DEPARTMENT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: ITEM NO. Administration Change in Tort Liability Limits XIB2 Requested Action: Motion to waive the per-claimant limit of$300,000 and increase said limit to $750,000 per claimant and $750,000 per occurrence as related to the City's statutory tort liability. Background Information: The City participates in the League of Minnesota Cities Insured Trust (LMCIT) for our general liability coverage. As per the attached letter from Mr. Lane, the LMCIT is requesting the City to determine if it desires to waive the per-claimant limit of$300,000 per person, thus increasing same to $750,000 which is the new statutory limit per occurrence (up from $600,000). The additional premium cost would be $4,414. For an additional premium of$12,590, the City could choose to further waive these limits up to $2.75 million which would include our excess liability coverage. Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney, is recommending that we only waive up to the $750,000 maximum at the additional cost of$4,414. CJ:mdd Tort/Joyce/Kdrive Form c\hr\council\an-form.wpd Rev 12/4/95 FIA J.A. PRICE AGENCY, INC. 7100 SHADY OAK ROAD, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 • 612-944-8790 • FAX 612-944-0097 May 12, 1998 City of Eden Prairie City Council RE: Statutory Municipal Tort Liability Currently the city carries $600,000 basic limits of liability and an excess additional limit of$2,000,000. Under Minnesota statutes and based on how the current coverages are written, the maximum payable under tort liability would be $600,000. The league has chosen to waive the $200,000 limitation under the current basic policy automatically. The excess policy does have the statutory limitation in effect. This limitation would not apply to claims brought under federal statues, however. Effective January 1, 1998, the limits are now$300,000 per claimant and $750,000 per occurrence. Because of these changes, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust is requesting city councils decide whether they want to follow the above limits or waive the per claimant limit of$300,000 which would change it to $750,000 per claimant and $750,000 per occurrence. The additional premium cost for this waiver would be $ 4,414.00 . The city would also have to waive these limitations on the excess liability policy. The additional cost would be $ 12,590 . Since the city has received substantial dividends back each year, the actual net additional cost might be around 35%lower. The 1997 dividend was 57% and in 1996 was 48%. See attachments. Sincerely Yours, J.A. PRICE AGENCY, INC. Skip Lane c/c: Carl Jultio, Wayne Estenson Roger Pauly "BUSINESS AND PERSONAL INSURANCE SPECIALISTS" An example of how these statues work would be the incident which happened in St. Paul several years ago. A City of St. Paul street crew cut a gas line causing an explosion which caused severe damage and injuries. The City of St. Paul was only responsible for $200,000 per claimant and a total of$600,000 for the total loss. A lot of people went uncompensated for their losses. CITY OF EDEN PRAITMCZTY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY DATE NAB OF SPEAKER ADDRESS 5/ me q I 7-e -5k qs-6‘-- (-1(q &u..,0,,e__- )).-e,— _ _ --e)-(Ay _ 5 ç 4-7_ -- At' (/ q' -'e(.2 biN 5 S 17io A 'e e___ (51b--- NP,„.,--„,_ 1-6(i) '''''''''P-Ha' /--(4' . 5-* Sre6/e,4 a i7---" q 7 a a(eo - f 0A /ems Ct,ti N'c '" i - �t-v�=*- C ,_�c '-'4;.-- L-6,,,,_ exu,,,t 103to u. ,,,A( Riv,i(v.z.,, , bv- . 575 (,3e91 ;\( Forc 9 7,),o AM Lce 4 D r 5/ Sco Lu4k,i qz7 1 / l; t \ (ce �c Dp. ,--6/._r-' Do _1 S ��`Xo Ng--7 0 1 `/ 2eEQ__ _ _k__ ` C:\CITYCOUN\SIGNIN.WPD